Avery Architectural and Fine Arts Library Gift of Seymour B. Durst Old York Library Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/historyofwestcheOOscha PIT STORY OF WESTCHESTEE COUNTY, NEW YORK, INCLUDING MORRISANIA, KINGS BRIDGE, AND WEST FARMS, WHICH HAVE BEEN ANNEXED TO NEW YORK CITY. BY J. THOMAS SCHARF, A. M., LL. D. Author " Ilislory of Mnri/lanil," "Chronicles of Baltimore," " Histor}/ of Baltimore City and Cuunti/," " Hi story of St. Louis Citii fiiiil Count;/," "History of the City of Philniklphia, Pa.," etc., etc. Corresponilinq Member of the Historical Societies of New York, Penmylmnia, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Virc/inia, Georgia, South Carolina, Historic anil GcneO' logical Society of New Enijlanl, Philosphical Society of Ohio, etc., etc. ASSISTED BY A STAFF OF CAREFULLY SELECTED EXPERTS IN EVERY DEPARTMENT. IN TWO VOLUMES, ILLUSTRATED. VOL. I. L. E. PHILADELPHIA: PRESTON & 1886. CO. Copyright, 1886, By L. E. Prkston & Co. All Rights Jieserved. PRESS OP JAS. B. nODGEKS PRINTING COMPANY, PHILADELPHIA. PREFACE. In presenting this "History of Westchester County" to the i)ublic, the Editor believes, uo apology is necessary. It is a new and trustworthy history of the county, founded upon the best authorities, and the most authentic documents and authoritative records. In no sense of the word is it built up out of, or repeated from, any previous one on the same subject, or any of its branches. The plan of the work is to a large extent novel — the grouping of so many representative writei-s, to tell so interesting a storj' as that of the origin, career and significance of Westchester County, has no parallel in the history of any other county in the United States. To present the principal historical phases of the several towns, and the county's life and development, together with the traces of previous occupation and the natural history of the county, the various chapters were assigned to writers, most of them well known in their respective spheres, and some of them of national reputation, who, from study and association, were in a measure identified with their subjects. Their treatment of these topics is such that what they have written may be taken as the best comprehensive expression of existing knowledge, put together with that authority which comes from special study. In the diversity of authors there will, of course, be variety of opinions, and it hsis not been thought ill-judged, considering the different points of view assumed by the various writers, that the same events should be interpreted sometimes in varj'ing, and perhaps opposite, ways. The chapters may thus make good the poet's description, — "Distinct as the billows, yet one as the sea," — and may not be the Avorse for each offering a reflection, according to its turn to the light, without marring the unity of the general expanse. The Editor has endeavored to prevent any unnecessary repetitions, and to provide against serious omissions of what might naturally be expected in a history of its kind. In more than one instance he has been constrained by his deference to local authority upon strictly local subjects, and by yielding to the testimony of experts in matters which they alone are supposed to know thoroughly, to hold back his own judgment in regard to certain subjects, and permit the local writer and the expert to tell the whole story their own way. The result has sometimes been clash, confusion and contradiction ; for there is nothing about which local authorities and experts differ so much among themselves as those particular events and things in regard to which they collectively consider it the height of presumption for "outsiders" to disagree with them. Where the subject happened to be one of moment and importance, the author has cut the Gordian knot and stated things to suit himself ; but in indifferent or trivial concerns he has simply stood aside and let each writer give his own version. Some space has been given to biographical sketches of leading and representative men, living and dead, who have borne an active part in the various enterprises of life, and who have become vi PREFACE. closely identified with the history of the county. The achievements of the living must not be forgotten, nor must the memories of those who have passed away be allowed to perish. It is the imperative duty of the historian to chronicle the public and private efforts to advance the great interests of society. Their deeds are to be recorded for the benefit of those who follow them, — they, in fact, form part of the history of their communities, and their successful lives add to the glory of the county. The Editor would be unjust to himself and the county whose history he has compiled, if he did not acknowledge, with feelings of profound gratitude, the cordial aid extended to him and his undertaking by the respective Avriters and by the people of Westchester County. They have given him the fullest encouragement throughout, and have helped him materially in elaborating and perfecting the work. Important and valuable assistance and information have been received from the following persons, to whom also particular recognition is due : — James Wood; Franklin Crouch, Rev. David Cole, D.D., Rev. John A. Todd, Thomas C. Cornell, Joseph Barrett, Frederick Whittaker and Josiah S. Mitchell. The scope and method of this history of Westchester County, is best understood by the table of contents, and the names of the Avriters annexed. It is sufficient to demonstrate the broad taste and judiciousness of selection on the part of the Editor. Without their indispensable aid and invaluable stores of material on the history of this interesting county, which they have been diligently collecting for years past, it would have been impossible to present this history in the satisfactory shape it now assumes. To the publishers of this history, the Editor on behalf of himself and his collaborators, must gratefully pay the meed, thrice deserved, of most hearty and effective co-operation with him and them throughout the undertaking. They have most liberally met every desire of the writers in respect of letter-press and engravings of portraits, views, maps and other illustrations ; they have spared no expense or effort to make the mechanical execution of the volumes equal to the sub- ject, and to the Editor's ambition, and they have helped him in every difficulty and sought to remove every obstruction from his path while the work was in progress. To the subscribers of the work, who, by consenting to take it unseen on the Editor's own recommendation and the strengtli of his and the publisher's reputation, have secured its successful completion and publication, the Editor renders his most grateful thanks, with the earnest hope that nothing in the volumes and nothing omitted from them may cause them to regret their confidence and their liberality. J. THOMAS SCHARF. Baltimore, July 6, 1886. CONTENTS OF VOLUME I. CHAPTER I. Paoe. Topography, Boundaries and Ge- OLO(iY, 1-9 Bv J. Thomas Scharf, A. M., LUD. CHAPTER II. The Indians of Westchester County, 9-20 By James Wood. CHAPTER III. The Discovery and Settlement of Westchester County, 20-31 By James Wood. CHAPTER IV. The Origin and History of Manors IN New York, and in the County of Westchester, 31-160 a Parts : 1. The Indian Owners of New Nethorland ami of Westchester. 2. How tlie Indian Title vested successively in the Dutch West India Company, the British Crown, and the Independent State of New York. 3. The Dutch in New Nethcrland. 4. The Colonization by the West India Company. 5. The Nature of the Dutch System of Government and Law, established in New Netherland, and of the Patroonships. 6. The Patroonsliip of Oolen-Douck. 7. The Capture of New Nethcrland from the Dutch, and the Creation of the Knglish ' Province of New York." 8. The English .System in the Province of New York under the Duke of York as Lord Proprietor. "J. The Manors in New York, what they were not, and what they were. 10. The Franchises, Privileges, and Incidents, of Manors in the Province of New York, and in the County of West- chester, and the Parishes in the latter. 11. The Churih of Enj;land I'arochial Organization in West- chester County, and its Relations to tlie Manors. 12. The Manors and the County in their Mutual Kclations, and the Origin and Formation of the latter. 13. The Manor of Cortlandt, its Origin, Special Franchises, Division, First Lord and his Family, Particular Histoi-y, and Topography, 14. The Manor of S< ars say, from the said Narragansett Bay on the east to the south eea on the west part ; with the islands thereto ac^oining, etc.^' That most comprehensive grant not only covei'ed the disputed territory, but took in the greater part of the Dutch claim on the Hudson. King Charles granted to his brother, the Duke of York and Albany, on the 24th of ^larch, 16()4, all of New Netherland from the Delaware to Cape Cod. This grant embraced Connecticut east of the Connecticut River — with some variations of the boundaries — and also the whole of Long Island, " together with all the river called Hudson River, and the lands from the west side of Connecticut River to the east side of Delaware Bay." By the charter and patent issued within less than two years of each other, nearly all of New York was THE DIFFERENT BOUNOAKY LINES BETWEEN CON- NECTICUT AND NEW YORK.^ granted to Connecticut, and most of Connecticut given to New Y^ork. On the 18th of September, 1664, Colonel Richard Nicolls, the representative of the Duke of York, received the surrender of the city of New Amsterdam, and the whole of the New Nether- lands accepted the situation of an English colony by the 12th of October following Notwithstanding the charter of Connecticut was older than the patent to the Duke of York, no little alarm was taken when it was known that their boun- darie.s had been disregarded by the King in his ])atent to his brother. Delegates were dispatched by the authorities of Connecticut to the Governor of New 'This map is copied by permission from Rev. Charles W. Buird's " History of Rye," p. 105. - 4 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. York for the purpose of cougratulation and settle- ment of the boundary line. These delegates and the commissioners appointed by the Governor of New York met on the 28th of October, 1664, and came to the understanding that the boundary limit between the two claimants should be fixed at a distance of twenty miles east of the Hudson River, and ninning parallel with that river northward from Long Island Sound. This agreement was not signed, and a few weeks later it was ordered and declared, — " That .ye Creeke or ryvcr called Momoronock wti" is reported to be about thirteen myles to ye east of West Cliester, and a lyne drawne from ye east point or Syde where ye fresh water falls into ye salt, at high water niarke, north northwest to ye line of ye Massachusetts he ye westerne hounds of ye said Colony of Connecticut."' The line thus established i>roved fruitful of civil strife, which will find its ftiller detail when the event- ful story of Rye comes to be written. The Connecti- cut officials induced Nicolls to believe that Mamaro- neck was twenty miles east of the Hudson. Nicolls trusted them and hence arose the trouble, the real distance of Mamaroueck from the Hudson being only about ten miles, instead of twenty. The intention was that this line, twenty miles east of the Hudson, should continue at that distance until it struck the boundary line of Massachusetts ; but being given a " North Northwest " direction, it intersected the Hud- son River at West Point, and cut off a large part of New York west of that river. On the 24th of Novem- ber, 1688, negotiations were again undertaken to fix the boundary line, and articles were concluded be- tween Governor Dougan and Council of New York, and the Governor and delegates of Connecticut, that the line should run as originally intended, twenty miles east of the Hudson River. But upon it becom- ing evident that such a line would deprive Connecti- cut of several towns which she had planted, it became necessary to vary the line in parts so that these towns should remain in Connecticut; hence the zig-zag boundary line at the southern end between the two States ; and as an ofiFset for the territory thus given to Connecticut, an ' equivalent tract" was taken from Connecticut at the northern part of the line, and "The Oblong," of 61,440 acres, or a tract of laud two miles in width and fifty in length, was given to New York from Ridgefield to the Massachusetts line. The boundary thus agreed upon began at the mouth of Byram River at a j^oint thirty miles from New York, and following that stream as far as the head of tide-water, or about a mile and a half from the Sound, to a certain " wading-place," where the common road crossed the stream at a rock known and described as " The Great Stone at the Wading- Place." From that stone the line was to run northwest till itshould reach apoint eight miles from the Sound; thencealine run- ning eastward parallel to the general course of the Sound, and twelve miles in length was fixed upon. 1 Boundaries of State of New York, vol. i. p. 25. From its termination another line, eight miles in length, was to be run in a north-northwest direction, and from the end of that line the boundary was to extend north to the Massachusetts line, with the ■'equivalent tract " included. The boundary line thus agreed upon remained as such for many years, recognized but not legally es- tablished by the concurrent action of both States. The Legislature of Connecticut, on the 8th of May, 1684, formally approved the agreement and appointed a surve} or to lay oft' the line. In October following. Governor Dongan's officers met the surveyor of Con- necticut at Stamford, and the amount of land con- ceded to Connecticut was ascertained, but their sur- vey terminated with the line drawn parallel to the Sound as far as a point twenty miles from the river. Beyond this they simply indicated what they sup- posed would be the extent of "The Oblong" to be laid out {IS an "equivalent tract." This condition of the Isoundary dispute remained unchanged, when, on the 29th of March, 1700, King William III. approved and confirmed the agreement of 1683 and 1684, wliereby Rye and Bedford were in- cluded in New York. The boundary dispute contin- ued unsettled, and in October, 1718, commissioners appointed by the two governments met at Rye, but tailed to agree upon a method of procedure — the New York commissioners refusing to go on with the sur- vey because those of Connecticut were not empower- ed to bind their government to any line that might be settled upon. In 1719, though Connecticut ap- pointed new commissioners with larger powers, they were still without power to agree upon a final and conclusive settlement. " A probationary act" by New York followed, providing for the appointment of a new commission by each colony, and requiring the New York commission to run all the lines in accord- ance with the agreement and survey of 1683 and 1684, and this duty was required to be performed, though no commission from Connecticut should be appointed. This act was conditional on the royal approbation. This proposition was not responded to by Connecti- cut until October, 1723, when a commission with full powers was appointed, and the tw^o commissions met at Rye in April, 1725. Their work began at " the great stone at the wading-place," and extended to the "Duke's trees," at the northwest angle of the town of Greenwich, where three white oaks had been marked in 1684, as the termination of the survey of that year. Here want of funds suspended the work, which was not resumed until 1731, when the survey was com- pleted to the Massachusetts line ; the " equivalent tract" or " oblong " was measured and set off to New York, and the line designated by monuments along its course. This survey was ratified as to the oblong by both governments, and remained unquestioned until May, 1855, when Connecticut opened thesubject again, because " ranges of marked trees had long since disap- peared. Many of the heaps ofstones originally erected TOPOGRAPHY. 5 had been scattered. Traditions were found inconsistent and contradictory, varying the line in places to a con- siderable extent. Along the whole distance the great- est uncertainty existed, and a distrust and want of confidence in all the supposed lines, ratherthan a dis- position to contend for any. Resident* near the bor- der refrained from voting in either State ; while offi- cers of justice and collectors of revenue from both hesitated to exercise their authority up to any clearly- defined limit. These circumstances were taken ad- vantage of by those who desired to evade the pay- ment of taxes or the severity of the law." To this statement of facts New York responded by the appointment, in January, 1856, of Mr. C. W. Wentz, of Albany, an engineer of established reputa- tion, to survey, ascertain and mark the boundary line. No difficulty intervened from the initial point at the " wading stone," to the Ridgefield angle, but from thence to the Massachusetts line a radical dift'er- ence interposed between the commissions. The representatives of Connecticut contended for a straight line between the two extreme points, fifty- three miles apart, because the old monuments and marks upon the line were generally removed, and the original line could not be traced with any cer- tainty by reference t6 them. On the other hand, the commissioners of New York considered their author- ity limited to " ascertaining " the boundary as origi- nally defined ; no agreement was reached, and in August, 1859, each State appointed new commis- I sioners ; but at their conference at Port Chester, on 13th September, of that year, the same difference of views confronted the commission, and the conference resulted in no practical work. On the 3d of April, 1860, New York passed an act empow-ering the com- mission formerly appointed to survey and mark with suitable monuments the "line between the two States as fixed by the survey of 1731." Under this author- ity the New York commission fixed and marked the boundary line between the two States, placing monu- ments along the line at intervals of one mile from the Massachusetts line to the mouth of Byram River. The work was completed in the autumn of 1860. Still unsettled, the question came up by Connec- ticut threatening to contest her claims, and in 1878 and 1879 both States appointed commissioners to es- tablish the boundaries. An agreement was made, December 5, 1879, whereby the western boundary of Connecticut was fixed as the ex parte line survey- ed by New York in 1860, which was the old line of 1731. Connecticut, therefore, gave up her claim to the twenty-six hundred acres in dispute, between the straight line and the line of 1731 as reached, in ex- change for her southern boundary extended into the sound. That agreement was ratified by the Legis- ! latures of both States and confirmed by Congress dur- ing the session of 1880-81. Topography.— The topographical features of the county present much that is strikingly beauti- ful in scenery, as well as useful in agriculture and manufactures. The surface is broken by ranges of hills running in a direction generally parallel to the Hudson River, and separated by valleys. Of the two general ranges, one borders close upon the Hudson, and the other along the I Connecticut boundary line ; besides these, many minor ridges and hills diversify the surface, and give to the watei'-courses a general direction north and south. The heights of the hills range between two hundred and one thousand feet. The continuous valleys, extending north and south have been availed of by the railroads which intersect the county, while other roads in every direction have made the means of inter-communication easy and convenient. These features give to the roads running north and south a generally level character,wliile those extending across the country east and west are a constant succession of ascents and descents. Occasionally abrupt and rocky hills break the surface, and present obstacles to travel, sometimes inconvenient, but nowhere insur- mountable. The eastern bank of the Hudson River affords a landscape of surpassing beauty, varying with undulat- ing hills and gentle slopes, where countless numbers of villas, cottages, palaces of wealth, clustering villages, and busy towns attest the residence' of wealth and taste. Into the Hudson flow all the streams of the county whose water-shed trends to the westward. The hills along the eastern bank of the Hudson rise from three hundred and fifty feet near Hastings to one thousand two hundred and twenty-eight feet atAnthony's Nose promontory, in the northwest corner of the county. The valley of the Bronx River, in the middle section of the county, shows a depression of surface extending from near the centre of the county southward to the Sound. Still farther to the east the Mamaroneck River, empt3Mng into the Sound, as well as the Blind Brook Creek, show a succession of hills and valleys throughout the southern and east- ern sections of the county. In the northern part of the county the Croton River and its tributaries, flowing in a southwesterly direction to the Hudson River, at Tappan Bay, mark another valley depression which extends oyer a large portion of the Northern part of the county. These depressions have in several places created small lakes, of which Croton Lake is entirely artificial. Byram Lake, in Bedford and North Castle, Rye Pond in Harrison (covers two hundred and ten acres), Cross Lake and North and Solith Ponds, in Poundridge, Waccabuck Lake (covei-s two hutidred and twelve acres), in Lewisboro', Peach Lake, in North Salem, Mohegau and Mohansic Lakes, in York- town, and smaller bodies of fresh water in other local- ities indicate a formation of surface rolling and broken in character, and picturesque and beautiful in land- scape. The largest body of water in the county is Croton Lake, artificially formed by the Croton Dam, 6 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. five miles from the mouth of the Croton River, for supplying the city of New York with water. The Croton River, rising in Dutchess County, flows through Putnam County, and entering Westchester directly and through its tributaries drains Somers and part of Yorktown by the Muscoot branch, North Salem, by the Titicus River, Lewisboro', Pound- ridge and a part of Bedford by the Cross River, and portions of Bedford and New Castle by the Kisco River, and flowing southwesterly, enters the Hudson River at Tappan Bay. The Peekskill Creek, in the northwest corner of the county, flows among the many hills that stud that section and finds its outlet in the Hudson near Peekskill. Furnace Brook, in Cort- landt, is another small tributary of the Hudson. Pocantico River, rising in New Castle, forms the dividing line between Ossining and Mount Pleasant, and through Sleepy Hollow, finds its outlet in the Hudson at Tarrytown. Neperhan, or Saw-Mill River, rises in New Castle, and flowing through Mount Pleasant, Greenburgh and Yonkers, discharges its waters into the Hudson at the city of Yonkers. Tibbitts' Brook, a small stream in Yonkers, empties into the Spuyten Duyvil Creek. The streams which find their outlet in the Sound are: The Bronx River, which rises in the hills of Mount Pleasant, and North Castle, and flow- ing southerly, drains a large portion of the southern -middle section of the county. The West- chester Creek, a tidal stream, drains a small pari of the southern end of the county and empties into Westchester Bay, an estuary of the Sound. Hutchin- son River, rising in Scarsdale, flows southward into Eastchester Bay, on the Sound. Mamaroneck River^ rising near White Plains and Harrison, flows into Mamaroneck Harbor, on the Sound. Byram River and Blind Brook are streams which also discharge their waters into the Sound, the former at Port Ches- ter, after draining portions of Bedford, North Castle and Rye, and the latter at Milton, after draining por- tions of Harrison and Rye. The Maharness, rising in North Castle, and Stamford Mill River, rising in Poundridge, flow into Connecticut and thence to the Sound. The southern or Sound shore of the county is in- dented with bays and estuaries, of which Westchester or Pelham Bay and Mamaroneck Harbor are the largest. Peninsulas stretch out into the Sound, of which Throgg's Neck, Pelham's Neck, Davenport's Neck and DeLancey's Neck are the most important. Islands are ntimerous along the shore of the Sound. The largest are City, Hunter's, David's, Huckleberry and Manaessing Islands. The railroads that traverse the county are : The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad,which extends along the eastern bank of the Hudson River through the whole length of the county, entering it at Spuyten Duyvil, and leaving it at Anthony's Nose, at the corner of Putnam. At Spuyten Duyvil Creek the main line connects along the north bank to Harlem River Bridge, with the Grand Central Depot, at Forty-second Street. Riverdale Station, the first station in the present Westchester County, pre- sents a beautiful prospect of Yonkers on the north, the Palisades across the river, with the Ramapo range of hills in the distance. Yonkers, Hastings-on-the- Hudson, Dobbs Ferry, Abbotsford, Irvington, Tarry- town, Sing Sing, Croton, Crugers, Verplanck and Peekskill, are the principal stations along the line of this road. The New York and Harlem River Railroad extends through the central portion of the county, through Morrisania, West Farms, Eastchester, Scarsdale, White Plains, Mount Pleasant, New Castle, Bed- ford, Lewisboro and North Salem. Mount Vernon, White Plains, Pleasantville, Mt. Kisco, Katonah, and Croton Falls, are the principal villages along its line. At William's Bridge, the New York and New Haven Railroad branches and runs through Eastchester, Pel- ham, New Rochelle, Mamaroneck, Harrison and Rye. The New York City and Northern Railroad enters the county in Kingsbridge, and diverging there from the Hudson River Road, passes through Van Cort- landt. South Yonkers, and North Yonkers, up the Neperan Valley through Odells, Ashford, Elmsford or Hall's Corners, and leaves the valley at East Tarry- town ; thence by Tarrytown, North Tarrytown, Tarry- town Heights, Whitson, Merritt's Corners, Croton Lake South, Croton Lake North, Yorktown, Ama- vvalk. West Somers, Baldwin Place, Lake Mahopac, Carmel, Tilly Foster's, and terminates at Brewster, where connection is made, via Danbury, with the New England system. Geology.' — The rocks which compose New York Island, and underlie the adjacent country on the north and east, are chiefly gneiss and mica-schist, with heavy, intercalated beds of coarse-grained, dolo- mitic marble and thinner layers of serpentine.' These are all distinctly stratified, and, according to Prof. Dana, have once been sedimentary beds deposit- 1 The accompanying geological map of Westchester County was prepared by the officers of the United States Geological Survey, at Washington, D. C, from data prepared by Professor Dana, and presents the latest conclusions of that school of geologists who agree with Prof. Dana as to the Lower Silurian age of the West- chester County rocks. The geological portion ol' this cliapter was written at the office of the Geological Survey, at Washington, and eubniitted to Prof. McGee, the chief geologist of the survey, and he has approved it as correct and as full as the present information about the section of country will admit. Prof. McGee says that very little is known of the geological age of Westchester County, and that even that little is not accepted by all geologists. Prof. Newberry, differing with Prof. Dana and the United States Survey, holds that the county belongs to the Lau- rentian age, while the other side place the county region on the Upper Silurian age. We have given the views of both, and followed with the map. We have used Prof. James D. Dana's account of the limestone beds as the most importiint feature and value which geology points out for the county. Of course we had to abridge as much a.s possible in or- der to keep within the limits of our work. '- Prof. I. S. Newberry, in Popular Sci«Ht« Monlhly, for October, 1878. 73"45 73°30' 401 45' 73 •45 ' 73 '30' Geoloi>ir Map of VV^est Chester Coimty, N.Y. MILES .Ale/^morpftif . Jfv^fsan Jfivcrtha/'es ''''') _ . . . . . ^e/umor/tkic, TrmtoH f a?ctJr/ 'ju.s limc.vtontJsffL Afnlamorphtc^lhisJeCTi/ ■•.■a7iJ-ilrrne r<>n-il/i ttwortetttftl scktutA-. C/roTyra. s/u/e _ . /i-f.-Zicun- GEOLOGY. 7 ed horizontally — sandstones, shales and limestones — but now, upheaved and set on edge, are by nietamor- phism converted into compact crystalline strata, with the obliteration of all fossils— if fossils they contain- ed. The age of these rocks has not yet been accu- rately determined, although they have been supposed to be Lower Silurian, and a continuation of those which contain the marble beds of Western Massa- chusetts and Vermont. There are some reasons, however, why they should be regarded as still older. That they do not form the southern prolongation oi the marble belt of Vermont is indicated by the facts that both the marble beds and the rocks associated with them are so unlike in the two localities that they can hardly be parts of the same formation. In Vermont the marbles occur in what is essentially a single belt, are fine-grained, unusually banded and mottled, are nearly pure carbonates of lime, and the rocks immediately associated with them are gray siliceous limestones, quartzites and slates. In West- chester County and on New York Island, on the contrary, the niarbles are very coarsely crystalline dolomites (double carbonates of lime and magnesia), which occur in, a number of parallel belts, are gener- ally of uniform white or whitish color, and have no rocks associated with them that can represent the quartzites and argillites of Vermont. On the east bank of the Hudson, at and above New \''ork, wc have : 1st. A belt of crystalline rocks form- ing apparently a continuous series to and beyond the Connecticut line; 2d. Strata set nearly vertical, once forming high hills or mountains, now worn down by long exposure to a more rolling surface ; od. The series composed chiefly of gneiss and crystalline schists, with heavy beds of dolomite marble and thinner bands of serpentine; and 4th. Contain- ing in its western portion, where it adjoins the New Jersey iron-belt — with which it is inseparably connected — important beds of magnetic iron-ore, while apatite is one of the most common dissemina- ted minerals. For these and other reasons Mr. New- berry regards the New York rocks as belonging to the Laureutian age. On the other hand. Prof. James D. Dana ' holds that Westchester County is comprised within t\u Green Mountain region, that it borders the southern side of the Putnam County Archa'an, as Dutchess County does the northern, and resembles in its ordei that part of the Green Mountain region which now makes Western Connecticut. The topographical features of the county owe much to the lime-stont bolts, which, by their easy erosion, have determined the courses of river valleys, and the lines of marshes along such valleys, as well as located many of tlu lakes. The beds of this soft rock stand nearly verti- cal, thus favoring the excavation of deep channels. > PH|ier oil the Geolugical Relations of the Liue-atooe Belts of West- cUester County, N. Y., American Joitntalof Ixience. The valleys are sometimes abrupt on both sides, but usually have one side high, precipitous and rocky, and the other gently sloping ; and this is largely due, in connection with the erosion, to the pitch or dip of the beds. But the i)itch of the beds may not have been the only cause of the form of the valleys. Prof. Dana holds that the throw of the waters against the right bank of a stream (the western if flowing south, or the northern if flowing west), in consequence of the earth's rotation, may have had its effects, and may possibly account for the cases in which the western side is the steep one, notwithstanding a vertical or even a high eastern pitch. The lime-stone belts of the county are divided by Prof. Dana into: 1st, the Southern section of the county, from New York Island to White Plains ; 2d, The 3Iiddle section, from White Plains to Croton Lake ; and 3d, the Northern section, north of the Croton Lake. The southern section is composed of three areas or belts which, commencing in New York Island, extend for two or three miles into Westchester County. The tirst of these areas, the Trcmont, extends from Ford- ham southward to Harlem River, and thence into New York Island. It reaches the Harlem River by two lines — a western at Mott-Haven and an east- em at the mouth of Morris Hill Brook, west of Brooke Avenue. The second belt of the southern section, that of "the Clove" follows Cromwell's Creek, north of Central (or McComb's Dam) Bridge and the brook emptying into it. The most southern outcroj) occurs about a mile north of the Bridge; it again out- crops near the " Club House." This belt probably continues southward into New York Island. The third area of the southern section is a prominent feature of the north end of New York Island, from which it extends three miles northward into West- chester County along Tippitt's Brook. The Harlem River makes a deep cut through it at Kingsbridge; and where the abutments of High Bridge rest, disaj)- pearing there, outcrops at points in Tipj)itt's Valley as far as nearly three miles from Kingsbridge. Just above the point of junction of the Harlem and New Haven Railroads ledges of lime-stone are visi- ble, and were cut into in grading the railroad tracks. The areas of serpentine, with some calcareous ma- terial, ajjpear at New Rochelle and Rye. At Yonkers the lime-stone area follows the course of a north and south bend on Saw-Mill Creek, with a width of at least one hundred feet. There are indications of a more eastern belt along the Saw-Mill River Valley just north of the city. On Gnissy Sprain Brook a small area exists with a width to the south of live iiundred yards. On the IJronx River a lime-stone belt begins near Bronx ville, and taj)ers out to the south, while to the north, and for the most of its course, it is divided into two parts, separated by a band of mica-sihist and gneiss. The Hastings belt occurs along the Hudson to the north of Y(mkers. 8 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. In the middle section of the county, in the Saw-Mill River Valley, a large lime-stone area commences about two and a half miles north of Ashford, and widening at East Tarrytown, continues northward to a near junction with the Pleasantville area. This last- mentioned area is also broad and sinuous in its course, terminating just north of Chappaqua Depot. The Sing Sing belt commences south of the depot on the Hudson and extends north-northeast nearly to the boundary of the town of Ossining ; it also branches eastward up a small valley towards the Camp Woods. Half a mile east of the village of Croton occurs a small area without distinguishable features, and south of the Croton River a narrow area extends from near " Quaker Bridge " to the forcation of the river at Huntersville. At Merritt's Corner, and on the east border of Croton Lake, as well as near Bedford Station, small areas of lime-stone are indicated. East of the Pleasantville belt, on the border of New York and THE COBBLING-STONE, IN SOMERS. Connecticut, lies a lime-stone area, which extends along the course of Byram River to its source in Byram Lake. To the northeast of Byram Lake, following a valley along the head-waters of Mianus River, as well as another along that of Stone Hill River, the outcroppings of lime-stone indicate an area which completes the list of areas in the middle section of the county. The areas of the northern section of the county to some extent tend toward the east and west in trend and in the strike of the beds. The large eastern area of the northeast extends into Connecticut ; that at Cruger's Station lies mostly to the south and east of the station. At Verplanck's Point, and up Sprout Brook Valley or Canopus Hollow, extends an area nearly five miles in length. Prof. Dana regards Westchester County as topo- graphically a southern portion of the Green Moun- tain elevation ; that the grade of metamorphism fol- lows the same rule as to the north — that is, it is of greatest intensity to the eastward and to the south- ward. It is in accordance with this that the least degrees of metamorphism are found in the lime-stone and associated schists of the vicinity of Peekskill, in the northwest corner, while along the central and eastern portions of the county, and in the western, also, south of the Croton, the crystallization is com- monly very coarse; that the lime-stones have the same kind of associated rocks — that is, of mica-schists and gneisses — as the eastern and more metamorphic por- tions of the region in Connecticut ; that the lime-stones have a like paucity in disseminated minerals and simi- lar occurring species with those of Connecticut ; and that the ordinary normal trend of the rocks — north 10° east to north 20° east — is very nearly the average trend of the beds of lime-stone and associated rocks in the Green Mountain system. Prof. Dana's conclusions are that : " The lime-stone of Westchester County and New York Island and the conformably associated metamorphic rocks are probably of Lower Silurian age." The soils of the county are made up of the abrasions and disintegration of the gneiss, feldspar and lime-stone rocks, with considerable districts largely composed of sand and more limited areas of clay. As a whole, the soil may be called a light loam. It is generally favorable to the growth of cereals. The valleys have the addition of vegetable matter and are very productive of the rich natural grasses which abound here. The hillsides have suffered I'rom washing by heavy rains, but yield abundant crops to good cultivation. About the hill-tops and along the .summits of the ridges the rocks generally crop out, so that these localities are mostly left to be covered with forest growths, adding greatly to the beauty of the scenery. In many places in the county there are peat swam2>s, where ancient lakes have been tilled with the accumulation of vegetable matter and the growth of sphagnum moss. Tliis peat, when pressed and dried, makes excellent fuel. The great differences in elevation and exposure, together with the variety of soils, cause a remarkably large flora. In round numbers, about twelve hundred flowering plants and fifty varieties of ferns have been found here. The surface of the county has been much affected by glacial action and drift deposits. Croton Point, on the Hudson, and other places in the county show evi- dences of glacial moraines. Deep stria* and lighter scratches still remain upon many exposed rock sur- fiices and others have been smoothly polished. Im- mense numbers of boulders are scattered over the surface. The most of these are of granite, brought from Massachusetts and New Hampshire. Some are of conglomerate from across the Hudson River and others have great numbers of shell fossils. THE INDIANS. 9 A remarkable boulder is found in Soiners. It stands on the hill directly northeast of Muscoot Mountain in the southwestern part of Somers, and from its top can be seen the blue hills of Long Island across the sound, the northern elevations of Dutchess County and the distant lands of Connecticut. To the west it overlooks Yorktown and Cortlandt. One side of this curious rock has the appearance of an Indian's face. It is an immense mass of red granite, said to be the only specimen in the county, and is perched upon three lime-stone points, two feet or more above the surface of the ground, and four hundred feet above the Muscoot Valley. It was doubtless brought here by a glacier or droi)ped from an iceberg, which is mentioned in the old deeds as the " Cobbling Stone." CHAPTER II. THE INDIANS OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. BY JAMES WOOD, A.M. President of the Westchester County Historical Society. The 13th day of September, 1G09, marked the point of division between the pre-historic and the historic periods of the district of country now known as Westchester County. On that day Henry Hudson, the intrepid English navigator, anchored his vessel, the "Half-Moon," in the newly-discovered river, near the site of the present city of Yonkers. The dawn of the following day disclosed the residents of the village of Nappeckamak gathered upon the eastern shore, and viewing with wonder, but with a kindly interest, the strange revelation before them. We now know much, although far too little, of what has since transpired here ; but we know almost nothing of the events of the untold centuries that preceded that day. The European discoverers of North America found the continent peopled with millions of human beings, of types analogous to those of the Old World, and with characteristics almost equally varied. In stature they covered a wide range, from the dwarf-like deni- zens of the far north to the vigorous inhabitants of other sections, whose height averaged, in the men, fully six feet. In activity and courage they excited the admiration of their discoverers. Their color was unique, and was imagined to resemble that of copper ; but further investigation showed that this color varied greatly. Some of the natives were found to be nearly as dark as negroes, while in other sections they were almost as light as Caucasians. They spoke many hundred different languages, which showed striking analogies in their grammatical construction, with equally striking disparity in their vocabulary. The goal sought by these discoverers was India, and, im- agining that they had found its outlying provinces, they called the inhabitants of the new land Indians. It would be the merest conjecture to attempt to state how long man had occupied the American con- tinent. Apart from the length of time required for producing new languages, or even dialects, and from all ethnological considerations, there are facts con- nected with his existence here that indicate a period of almost incalculable anti(iuity. Of the animals found in the New World, none were identical with those known in the Old, and in the vegetable king- dom the same rule held almost as absolutely. Maize and tobacco were cultivated in every portion of the country where the climate suited their requirements, while cotton was grown in a section necessarily more limited in area. We may reasonably suppose that man existed here for a long time before he discovered the litness of maize for food, and for a much longer period before he began its cultivation; and then it must have required centuries to introduce it to gen- eral cultivation over nearly a hundred degrees of lati- tude in the two continents. It is well known that plants change their character very slowly; but maize, tobacco and cotton had so long been subjected to the transforming influences of cultivation as to have lost all resemblance to their original forms, so that they could no longer be identified with the wild species. The force of this consideration is heightened when we remember that, in this transformation, these plants became entirely dependent upon cultivation for their existence. In some portions of the continent the great an- tiquity of man is proven by the remains of his struct- ures still existing ; but as none of these were found in this section, the subject need not be considered here. Closely connected with the question of the time of man's existence here is that of his origin. How came he here? The question has received much con- sideration. The attempts to designate particular nations as the original peoplers of the American con- tinent, whether they were the Lost Tribes of Israel the Phwnicians or the Chinese, have so utterly failed to convince inquirers, that they have been generally abandoned. The autochthonic theory, the theory of indigenous origin, has had many strong arguments produced in its favor. Some of its advocates suppose that the Creator placed an original pair of human beings here, as Holy Scripture teaches that He did in the Eastern Hemisphere. But these arguments come short of conviction. The advocates of the theory of development that would find the ancestor of man in the monkey, have abandoned all idea of 10 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the change having taken place here, as the American continent has furnished no species of the apes, nor the remains of any such species from which man could have been developed. They all admit that narrow-nosed apes could alone have been the ancestors of man, and no such apes — no catarrhine simiadce — have existed here. When we look at the conditions on either side of the continent, we cannot suppose that it was at all impossible for men, at any indefinitely remote period, to have found their way hither. The climatic changes of past periods, at some time, may have made the route by Behring's Straits entirely practicable. The route by the Aleutian Islands is not difficult now to canoe navigators. The Pacific currents frequently cast the wrecks of Japanese vessels upon our north- western shores. The islands of the South Pacific afforded a probable way of communication, and it is believed that many have disappeared, comparatively recently, beneath the surface. On the Atlantic side the difficulties were by no means insurmountable, even if we ignore "the lost Atlantis." The trade- winds and equatorial currents carried Cabral and his Portuguese fleet, bound around the Cape of Good Hope, to the American shores, and led to the acci- dental discovery of Brazil. On his second voyage Columbus found, in a house on the island of Gauda- loupe, the stern-post of an European vessel. In various periods of the past the same forces may have brought men to these shores. It is probable that America was peopled from va- rious sources, and at widely separated periods. These must have been very remote to afford time for the production of the conditions found existing here. The aborigines of Westchester County belonged to the great family of Indians called the Algonquin Len- ape. Their connection with the Mound-Builders of the Mississippi Valley, with the Aztecs of Mexico, or with the builders of the wonderful structures found in Central America, if any ever existed, must have been extremely remote. Their traditions re- ferred in a very vague way to long journeys from the northwest, and great suflTering from cold on their way hither, and of contests with a people who occupied the country before them. Of their own history they were lamentably ignorant. Their computation of time by moons and revolving cycles led all investiga- tions into inextricable confusion. Any event beyond an individual's recollection floated vaguely in the boundless past. No records of any kind were made. For these reasons the Europeans were able to obtain from this people very little information of them- selves or their fathers. They existed here for unnumbered centuries, and then passed away, leav- ing behind them no sign to mark their occupa- tion of the country, save a few simple imple- ments of stone, and no structure of any kind memo- rializes their power or attests their strengih or skill. We are thus singularly destitute of nearly all means for acquiring accurate knowledge of this people's history. The Algonquin tribes occupied nearly the whole Atlantic seaboard, and their language necessarily was widely diffused. It has been found more fertile in dialects than any other aboriginal speech. It was strangely agglutinative, and gave expression to thought by stringing words together into an extended compound. It was the mother-tongue of those who greeted Raleigh's colonists on the Roanoke, of those who boarded the " Half-Moon " on the Hudson, and of those who welcomed and fed the Pilgrims at Plym- outh. It was heard from the land of the Esquimo to the Savannah River and from the Bay of Gaspe to the Mississippi. It is not necessary to investigate the national divisions of the Algonquins further than to .state that the Mohegans occupied the country along the left bank of the Hudson River, called Mahi- cannittuk, and eastward to the Connecticut, and from Long Island Sound northward to the mouth of the Mohawk, and perhaps to Lake Champlain. Their country was called Laaphawachking. North and west of the Mohegans were the powerful and warlike Iroquois, their immediate neighbors being the Hori- cans and Mohawks. Across the Hudson, below Cats- kill, were tribes belonging to the Delaware nation, and east of the Connecticut were the Pequots. Long Is- land was occupied by Mohegan tribes. It has been stated that at the time of discovery the Mohegans were under military subjection to the Iroquois, and were compelled to pay an annual tribute to them. This is not substantiated by investigation, for we find no reference to it in any of the treaties made by these tribes with the whites, nor was such a thing ever al- luded to in all the protracted negotiations between them. The subdivisions of the tribes were very numerous. They had advantages for local government and the pres- ervation of order. The form of government was very simple. Each local tribe had its ruler, called the sachem. He was also their representative in the general councils, which were composed of the representatives of the smaller tribes of the nation. They were presided over by the national grand sachem, who occupied the position of a sovereign. These councils assembled only in cases requiring concerted action, as in a gen- eral war. In all other matters the local tribes were independent, and declared war for themselves, or made peace without consulting their brother tribes. The national obligation was imperative, and treason to the decisions of a council was punished with death. Each nation had its emblem, or totem, which served the purpose of the flag of a civilized nation. These were used in times of war, and were drawn upon trees and rocks to indicate that the tribes had taken up the hatchet and had gone upon the war- path. The Mohegan totem was a wolf, and in de- claring war the animal was represented with its dex- THE INDIANS. 11 ter paw raised in a tlireatening manner. The name Mohegan meant " Enchanted Wolf." Their military forces had regular forms of orgainization and disci- pline. The companies from the local tribes had their commanders, who were selected for their prow- ess and achievements in arms. The united forces were commanded by chiefs who had obtained military distinction, and these stood in rank according to their services and their reputation for bravery, pru- dence, cunning and good fortune. There was but little need for civil government, as their chief possessions were held in common, and where personal property existed, the owner's rights were recognized. It is probable that these local tribes were communi- ties of blood relations, who readily recognized the patriarchal authority of their sachem and who held their lands in common. Doubtless, they closely re- sembled the clans and septs of Gi'eat Britain and Ireland, without the land being held either by tanistry or gavel-kind. The sachems received their support by the free contributions of the community. The ownership of land depended upon conceded original occupation or upon conquest. If obtained by con- quest, all original rights became vested in the con- querors, and if it was re-conquered, these returned to the original owner. They had but little idea of title to land. They valued only its occupation and use. The game that filled the forests and the fish that swarmed in the waters gave a value that they well appreciated, and they also prized their cultivable tracts. There is much uncertainty regarding the sub- divisions of the tribes in any given district, and if the question of their location were left to the state- ments and maps of the early European settlers, it well might be abandoned as hopeless. Fortunately, the title-deeds given to the settlers supply considerable in- formation, which, though not })erfect, enables us to locate the sub-tribes with tolerable accuracy. Yet the boundaries of such tracts as were sold by the aborigines were designated with much uncertainty by the Indian names of rivers, brooks and rivulets, hills, ponds and meadows, which are sometimes diffi- cult to locate. Treaties made between the settlers and the Indians assist us in the undertaking. The island upon which the city of New York has been built was occupied by the Manhattans. Their territory also extended along the Mahicanituk, or Hudson River, northward to the Neperhan, or Saw- Mill River, and eastward to the Aquehung, or Bronx River. Between the Neperhan and the Pocantico were the Weckquaesgeeks. The Sint Sinks occupied the land between the Pocantico and the Kitchawan, or Croton River. North of the Croton were the Kitchawancs, whose lands extended to Anthony's Nose and the Highlands, and eastward across the northern portion of Westchester County. East of the Manhattans, occupying the territory along the Sound, were the Siwanoys, who also occupied the southwestern i)ortion of Connecticut. North of the Siwanoys were the Tankitekes, occupying the central and ea.stern portions of the county. The western end of Long Island was occupied by the Canarsees. The Rockaways, Merricks, Marsapequas, Matinecocks, Corchangs, Manhassets, Secatogues, Patchogues, Shinnecocks and Montauks extended eastward, in the order named. West of the Hudson were the Navesinks, Raritans, Hackinsacks, Tappans and Haverstraws. Above the Highlands, upon the eastern side of the river, were the Nochpeens and the Wappitigers. Eastward, in Connecticut, was the large chieftaincy of the Sequins. That the Indians of Westchester were very numerous is proven by the fact that over fifteen hun- dred warriors were at one time in arms against the whites, and also by the number of their large villages. These villages were located where there were special advantages for fishing, or where a light and easily- worked soil was favorable for cultivation. The Manhattans had three villages upon Manhattan Island. Their largest village in this county was Nappeckamak, which occupied the site of the present city of Yonkers. At the southern end of the original township of Yonkers, overlooking the Hudson River (Mahicanituk) and Spuyten Duyvil Creek (Papirini- men,) they had a fortress which they called Nipinichsen. The Weckquaesgeeks had their principal village at the mouth of Wysquaqua, where the village of Dobb's Ferry now stands. It was called by the tribal name. Until recently its site was designated by extensive shell-beds. They had another village at the mouth of the Pocantico, on the site now occupied by Tarrytown. This village was called Alipconck. They had another village by the Neperhan, west of White Plains. The Sint Sinks had a village called Ossing-Sing, where "The Kill" empties into the Hudson at Sing Sing. They had a smaller village at the moulii of the Kitchawan or Croton River. The Kitchawancs had a large village upon Van Cortlandt's Neck, connecting Croton Point with the mainland. They had here the strongest fortress of any in the county. Like Nipinichsen, it was a heav- ily-palisaded stockade. They had another village upon Verplanck's Point and a larger one called Sack- hoes, where Peekskill now stands. The Siwanoys were a numerous tribe. They had a village upon Pelham Neck, ill the present town of Pelham ; another on Davenport's Neck, in New Rochelle ; and their largest settlement upon the shores of Rye Pond, in the present town of Harrison. Here was a very extensive burial-ground. There was also a settlement near Rye Beach. They had another village in the southern part of the town of West- chester, near Bear Swamp. They had an imjiortant castle upon what is still known as Castle Hill, west of Westchester Creek. 12 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. The Taukitekes had a village by Wampus Lake, in the town of North Castle, where the Sachem Wampus resided. They also had a village near Pleasantville, in the town of Mount Pleasant. There was a settle- ment by the Mehanas River, near the present village of Bedford. There was also a village where the Cross River (Peppensghek) unites with the Croton or Kitchawan, near the present site of Katonali. Here are still visible the remains of extensive stone fish- weirs, in the bed of the Croton River, that were built by the Indians. Besides the villages named, there were doubtless many more of whose existence no account has come down to us. That the Indians occupied this section in great numbers is rendered jirobable by the character of the country and its surroundings. The whole county is remarkably well watered and its soil produced an abundance of rich natural grasses. These conditions caused an abundance of game. The lands bordering the Beaver Dam River in Bedford were called "the deer's delight." The numerous lakes and streams throughout the county were well stocked with fish. These were taken with lines and nets, the cordage of which was made of twisted fibres of the dogbane and the sinews of the deer. Hooks were fashioned of the sharpened bones of fishes and birds. Weirs, fish- traps and spears were also employed. Deer and other game were taken by other means besides hunting with the bow and arrow. The English settlers found in good preservation, in the town of Poundridge, an extensive trap which they called a jjound, and from which the township had its name. It was situated at the south end of the ridge, not far from the present village, and inclosed the spring of water which still flows there. It was built of logs held together by what the English called saddle-stones, was twelve or fourteen feet high, and inclosed an acre or more of ground. From its narrow entrance there extended palisaded wings in each direction, so as to cross the valley and run up the adjacent hillsides. The valleys from the south and southwest come together here by the subsidence of the intervening ridges. The Indians in considerable numbers would start in the early morn- ing many miles away, and would " beat the bush " with hideous yells, working in the direction of the trap, while parties ran along the ridges on the right and left to prevent lateral escapes, and thus they drove before them the game of every description until they came to the wings of the trap, which led everything into the inclosure. Then the entrance was closed and all secured. In this way great numbers of deer and other game were taken. Important as were the food supplies obtained from the forests and streams, they were greatly increased by those from the surrounding waters. The Hudson River and the Sound make the situation of the county a remarkable one. These waters teemed with fish, which furnished the attraction to the villagers living upon their shores. In seasons of abundance, like the running of the shad in the spring-time, quantities of fish were dried and smoked, and thus preserved for future use. Shell-fish were extensively used. Along the Sound the numerous shell-heaps attested the In- dians' appreciation of the oyster. These shell-heaps resemble those of European countries, which, with the " kitchen-middens," have received so much attention from archaeologists. So extensive were these shell-heaps upon City Island, now forming part of the township of Pelham, that they gave to the surrounding waters the name of "the great bay of the island of shells." Similar heaps were found upon Berrian's Neck, in the township of Yonkers, and at the various village sites along the Hudson. The largest of these were upon Croton Point, where considerable areas are still cov- ered with them to the depth of two or three feet. This beautiful projection of land was called Senas- qua, one of the softest of Indian names, and in the adjacent waters of Tappan and Haverstraw Bays great quantities of oysters are still found and are taken elsewhere for increased growth. Befor.e the country was settled by the whites and the forests were cleared away, a much greater percentage of the rain-fall evaporated I'rom the surface of the land and less flowed away in the streams. On this account, the water of the Hudson was much more salt than now, and more favorable to the oyster's development. To overlook and protect the important oyster-beds of this wide portion of the river, the fort upon Van Cort- landt's neck was erected. It is an interesting fact that where these shells have remained undisturbed they are nearly all found whole, showing that the Indians opened the oysters without breaking them. It was probably accomplished by exposure to the sun. None of them have been exposed to flre. A remark- able number and variety of stone implements have been found here, and here a place of burial has been recently discovered. But the aboriginal inhabitants of Westchester did not depend alone upon the food derived from the chase and taken from the waters. They cultivated the land much more extensively than is generally supposed. The European navigators of the Hudson were impressed by the extent of the fields of maize. Suitable lands along the Sound were similarly used, and throughout the interior the early white settlers found their difiiculties greatly lessened by the extent of the lands already cleared and prepared for their immediate use. The Indian's success in the cultivation of land wa« remarkable, when we consider the disadvantages under which he labored. It must be remembered that he had taught no animal to assist him in his labor. He had no flock or herd, nor any kind of poul- try. His dog was a worthless creature, resembling a cross between the fox and the w-olf, and was only the lazy sharer of his cabin or the playmate of his chil- dren, and was not trained to usefulness in the chase. He had no iron nor any other metal, except rare spec- THE INDIANS. 13 imens of native copper, brought from the shores ot Lake Superior and worn as ornaments, or, perhaps, fashioned into liighly-prized spear-lieads. In the present " iron age," when every recjuired tool is ready- fashioned to our hand, it is difficult for us to imagine such a situation. How could he work the soil? How attack a tree ? How obtain an implement of any de- scription ? In his various operations he had three agents — stone, wood and fire. He sometimes employed the first in the cultivation of his crops, but more often his only implement was a poor hoe made from the shell of the clam or the shoulder-blade of the deer. On this account he worked no soils but those that were light and easily stirred. Unfortunately, such were quickly exhausted, and then foiled to yield abundant returns for his labor. His only means of restoring fertility was in the use of fish as a manure, jrenhaden were his chief reliance for this purpose, and on this account the corn-fields were most exten- sive near the shores. His most important crop was maize, and upon this he relied, very largely, for his subsistence in winter. It was roasted while young, and when ma- tured and dry was ground into meal by stone pestles and mortars, and when this was moistened with water and baked upon heated stones.the product was called nook- hik," from which have come " nocake and " hoe-cake." The grain was preserved after harvest by being buried in the dryest places under a thatch of coarse grass and boughs. Next in importance to maize was the sieva bean. It was extensively raised and boiled alone or with the green-corn. The latter dish was called " succotash." The boiling was accomplished in bowls of steatite, or in vessels of rude pottery. In addition to these, pumpkins were grown. These were readily baked before the fire. Wild fruits and nuts, in their seasons, also contributed to his support and enjoyment. Tobacco was also grown here, but we cannot learn how exten- sively. With their requirements for food thus met, the Indians here were not destitute of the means of comfortable clothing. The country abounded with fur-bearing animals. Beavers were very numerous. The names of Beaver Meadows, scattered throughout the county, and that of Beaver Dam River, in the upper portion, attest this. Van der Donck, the pa- tron of Yonkers, wrote, in 1656, that eighty thousand of these were annually killed in this quarter of the country. In November, 1624, among the cargo of the first laden vessel from New to Old Amsterdam were 7246 beaver-skins, 675 skins of otters, 48 of mink, 36 wild-cat and various other sorts. In Wassenares' " His- tory of the New Netherlands," it is narrated : " The tribes are in the habit of clothing themselves with ot- ter-skins, the fur inside, the smooth side without ; which, however, they paint so beautifully that at a dis- tance it resembles lace. When they bring their com- modities to the tradci-s, and find they are desirous to buy them, they make so little matter of it that they rip up the skins they are clothed with and sell them also, returning naked to their homes. They use the beaver-skins mostly for the sleeves and the otter for the rest of the clothes." Their most elegant gar- ments were mantles made of feathers, overlapping each other, as upon the birds themselves. Sometimes these were artistic productions of real beauty. They made leggins and moccasins of deer-skins. The men always went bare-headed, and, in the summer, wore nothing beside a short garment about the loins, called, by the white settlers, " Indian breeches." The women dressed their glossy hair in a thick, heavy plait. Their dress usually consisted of two garments, — a leather shirt and a skirt of the same material fast- ened around the waist, with a belt and reaching below the knees. From these various considerations, we can Foil I MOKTAR AX I) PESTLE^ il near Croton River, in Yorktown. Tlio pestle is 18 inches long. understand how a large population could exist in comparative comfort in this section. The Indian houses were made by planting poles in the ground and binding them together at the top. These were covered with bark or thatched with reeds and rushes, so as to be impervious to rain. Their beds were made of evergreen boughs, covered with skins and furs. Their furniture was extremely sim- ple. Besides the before-mentioned pots for cooking, they had wooden bowls for holding their food and wooden spoons for handling it. Mats made of rushes sometimes covered the floors of their huts. They had buckets ingeniously made of birch-bark, so as to be water-tight, and baskets of various sizes, made of ' The iDdian specimens illnstratiiig this chapter are from the iulcrest- ing and valuable private collection of Mr. James Wood, of Mt. Kisco, Westchester County. 14 HISTORY OF AVESTCHESTER COUNTY. splints, rushes or grass. Their villages were com- posed of houses closely huddled together about a central .sj)ace, which was used for the transaction of public business, for ceremonies and amusements. Besides the manufactures already named there were others that attested the Indian's skill. He made boats of two kinds. One consisted of a light, wooden frame, covered with birch-bark, skillfully and tastefully fast- ened at the seams; this boat was peculiarly valuable on long journeys, as its lightness allowed it to be easily carried from the waters of one stream to those of another. The other boat was a much heavier affair, fashioned from the trunk of a tree. The wood was charred by heated stones and then scraped away with stone gouges. These boats were sometimes thirty or more feet in length, and were capable of carrying a considerable number of passengers. In some of the sales of land to the white settlers along the Sound the Indians reserved " the white-wood trees, suitable for making canoes of." PAETLY DRILLED PIECE OF STE.\TITE.' In nothing was the Indian's skill more strikingly shown than in his manufacture of implements of stone. These were mortars and pestles, axes, hatchets, adzes, gouges, chisels, cutting tools, skinning tools, perforators, arrow and spear-heads, scrapers, mauls, hammer-stones, sinkers, pendants, pierced tablets, jiolishers, pipes and ceremonial stones. Specimens of all these have been found in Westchester County. The mortars were usually bowl-like depressions worn into some rock beside the village site, where the wo- men could conveniently resort to grind the corn. Sometimes they were made in portable stones. The pestles were from two to three inches in diameter and from six to twenty inches in length, and gener- ally of fine sandstone, greenstone or hornblende. Axes were made of varieties of greenstone, syenite, 1 With black flint drill foiind in hole. These epeciniena were found at Crofoii I'uitit, and Mr. J;imes Wood says they are uniiiiie. HOEKBLEXDE AXE. Found in Bedford. granite, porphyry and sandstone. They may be de- scribed as wedges, encircled by a groove near the heavy end. They varied in weight from half a pound to six or eight pounds. The groove was made for securely fastening the handle. This was bound with pieces of raw hide, or sometimes a young tree was cleft while yet grow- ing, and the axe, being inserted, was left in the proper position until the growth had closely formed about it. Adzes, gouges and chisels were made of tough greenstone and hornblende, and were used in the manufacture of their canoes. The cut- ting tools were leaf-shaped implements made of flint or jasper, finely chipped to an edge, which com- bined in its cutting the principles of the saw and the knife. There were also flakes of obsidian that had sharp cutting edges. Skinning tools, or celts, were wedge-shaped imple- ments made of many kinds of stone, worked to a fine edge at one end, and gener- ally polished. Perforators were delicately wrought of flint or jasper. Scrapers, were small implements of flint used in -dressing skins. Arrow and spear- heads form the best known class of Indian implements, and have been found here in great numbers. They were made of flint, jasper, chert, hornstone, quartz and a variety of other stones. The spear-heads were from two to eight and ten inches in length, while the arrow-points were smaller and light- er, and many speci- mens of each were beautifully wrought. Some were worked by blows and some by dropping water upon the heated stone. Oc- casionally throughout the county quantities of flint chips are found on some Indian village site, where the ancient arrow- maker had his workshop. Mauls and hammer-stones were made of several varieties of tough stones. The former were grooved for hafting, and the latter were POLISHED FLESHER. FLESHER WITH HANDLE. THE INDIANS. 15 circular or elliptical, two and a half inches in diameter, or three in greatest length, and an inch in thickness, with slight depressions worked at the middle of the sides for the thumb and finger. Thev usually show GROOVED HAMMER, With castle. POLISHED AXE. evidences of wear at the circumference or ends. Large numbers of these have been found along the Hudson. Sinkers were used in weighting the nets, and were simple flat stones, notched at the opposite edges. HOE OF GREY FLINT, BY 5\ INCHES. Pendants were pear-shaped, pointed at one end and grooved near the other. Pierced tablets were used in twisting the bow-strings or worn as ornaments. Some remarkable specimens of these, notched as if kept as FLIXT KNIFE, 8 by 3J4 inches. FLINT KNIFE, S'/i by 3 inches. records, have been found here. Pipes have not been found in great numbers, but some of the speci- mens are very interesting. They are made of green- stone, steatite and sometimes were fashioned of clay. They represent birds, or the heads of birds, turtles and various animals, the beaver more frequently than others. Ceremonial stones were the most finely wrought of all the Indian's stone-work. They were carried as evidences of rank, or to excite a supersti- tious reverence. They were wrought from serpentine PIERCED RECORD TABLET.' CEREMONIAL STONE OF GREEN. or a fine and beautiful striped slate, and were drilled so that they could be carried upon a rod or handle. This striped slate, so far as is known, was nowhere found nearer than Canada. The few specimens of obsidian found here must have come from the Rocky Mountain region. Three or four spear-heads, ham- mered from native copper, that have been found here must have been brought from the shoi'es of Lake Su- perior, while the flints and jaspers, from which so many arrow-heads w'ere made, must have been brought a considerable distance. These facts prove that the Mohegans carried on commerce of exchange with other tribes, and thus obtained articles that liad been brought from very remote localities. Holes were drilled through stones for ornament or use by a drill ot flint, or a reed with water and sand. These were worked by a bow-string. The bow was an important article of the Indian's outfit, and was his chief weapon in war and in the chase. It was skillfully foshioned from ash or hickory-wood, and was strung with the sinews of the deer. Another important article of manufacture was wampum, which was their me- dium of exchange, or money. It was made from the shell of the quoliog, or hard-shell clam. It was cylindrical in form, a quarter of an inch long, and in diameter less than a pipe-stem, drilled lengthwise, so as to be strung upon a thread. The beads of a white color rated at half the value of the black or violet, made from the portion where the contracting muscle of the clam is attached to the shell. They were used for ornament as well as for coin, and ten thousand or more were sometimes wrought into the belt of some 1 Six by two inches, found in Bedford. GROOVED HAMMER. 16 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. great chieftain. The district about Byram Lake was called Cohemong, which meant the place where wam- pum is made. There have been but few unbroken specimens of Indian pottery found in Westchester County, but BIRD AND TORTOISE PIPE. Found in New Castle. ducks' head pipe. Found in Bedford. numerous fragments, some of considerable size, are in existence. These are all quite rude, although some show attempts at ornamentation. On Croton Point, where the clay was favorable for this manufacture, a trench has been discovered containing numerous fragments of earthen vessels, along with charcoal, indicating that here may have been a simple kiln for burning pottery. In the manufacture of all these various articles, some of which required a great amount of labor, be- BLACK FLIXT KNIFE. sides the time necessarily taken in hunting and fish- ing and in the cultivation of their crops, our Indians must have been pretty fully occupied, and we can scarcely believe them to have spent so much time in idleness as is generally supposed. In their domestic relations the Mohegans were not depraved. The lover courted his chosen maiden with presents of ornaments, and won the favor of her par- ents with gifts of wampum. The consent of the sachem was obtained to their marriage, and he usu- ally joined their hands together and they went away as man and wife. The man had but one wife, unless he was a sachem or occupied an exceptionally high position. The marriage tie was respected, and unfaith- fulness was looked upon as a crime. In cases of sepa- ration the wife was given her share of the goods and departed, being then at liberty to marry again. The Mohegans were never charged with licen- tiousness, as were Indians elsewhere. The women were described as modest and coy in their behavior, and they indignantly repelled all improper advances made by the whites. There is no account of any insulting treat- ment having been offered to female white captives. Children were kindly treated, but knew little of pa- rental restraint. The girls were early taught quiet submission to the labors of their position, and the boys were encouraged to independence, and trained to be- come skillful in the chase and in war. If anv deformed children were born, they must have FLINT SKIN SCRAPER. FLINT PEE FORATOR. died in infancy, for the European visitors stated that none were cross-eyed, blind, crippled, lame or hunch- backed ; and that all were well-fashioned, strong in constitution of body, well-proportioned and without blemish. They were kind in their treatment of the sick. They had learned the medicinal virtues of many herbs and of a few other simples. They bound HAND-MADE AND FINCiER-MARKED VESSEL OF POT T E up wounds with mollifying preparations of leaves. They treated fevers by opening the pores of the skin with a vapor bath ; but their chief reliance in many diseases was upon supernatural cures. Their medi- cine-man, or pow-wow, excited their superstitious susceptibilities and worked upon their imaginations, using, with great solemnity, the ceremonial stones al- ready described to assist in his work. Their reliance upon faith-cures was complete. O R N A M i: X T A L 1 ' TT FRY. Found in Pethani in Indian grave. It is not known that there were formal ceremonies for burying the dead. The bodies were usually in- terred in a sitting posture, facing the southwest. With the dead were buried their arms, ornaments, useful utensils, wampum and parched corn for food. Of the religious belief of the Mohegans we have very little testimony, and even such as we have can- not be considered reliable. In the compass of human 1 This is of doubtful origin ; found deeply buried in a sjiring near the Indian path "Succabonk," in Bedford. THE INDIANS. 17 thought there are no ideas requiring so clear an ex- pression to be correctly understood as those pertain- ing to religion. The Indian endeavored to express these in a language imperfectly understood by the whites, and naturally the hearers interpreted these expressions according to their own predilections. It is not strange, therefore, that very little has come to us that can be implicitly accepted. But all our wit- nesses unite upon this important point, — thea-e was no kind of idolatry practiced among the aborigines here. They believed in one all-wise, all-powerful and beneficent Being, whom they called the Cireat Spirit, and to whom they offered prayer. They also believed in an evil spirit. The former they knew under the name Cantantowit. and the latter under that of Hob- bamocko. The former had sent them their corn and beans. A crow first brought a grain of corn in one ear and a bean in the other, from their heaven, which they called the happy hunting-grounds, located in the far southwest. Their highest conceptions of a place of blessings were associated with the southwest, because the wind from that quarter is soft and balmy and an indicator of fair weather. The dead were buried with their faces toward the abode of the blessed. They believed in rewards and punishments here- after, and they held that after death the souls of the good went to the home of Cantantowit, far away in the good southwest. There they were delivered from every sorrow and preserved from all suflering. The pleasures they there enjoyed were similar in charac- ter with those they had known here, but their perfec- tion was more complete and their abundance exhaust- leas. The wicked knocked also at the same door, but were denied admittance, and, being turned away^ they wandered forever in a state of horror and rest- less discontent. It is extremely difficult to form a correct estimate of the Indian's character before that character be- came changed by contact with the Europeans. His- tory teaches us how quickly an inferior race becomes impressed by the traits of a stronger people coming among them. Unfortunately, that which is evil is much more quickly imitated than the noble and good. Before the European became sufficiently ac- quainted with the Indian to be capable of judging of his character, that character had been changed by contact with the observer himself, so that he saw, in part, the reflection of himself in the subject before him. At best, there was presented only a dissolving view that was transformed before the observer's gaze. The Indian was immediately called a drunkard, and yet he had no beverage whatever that could intoxi- cate, and no drug that answered any similar purpose. The first Indian who felt the influence of alcohol found it in the cabin of the " Half-Moon." So, also, with other vices. True, the Indian was a barbarian. He showed no evidence of having been in any way better or more civilized in the seventeenth century than he may have been in the tenth or fifth. With him, might made right. He imposed upon his wo- men and made them his slaves. He had no intellec- tual exercise, and possessed not even the rudest cul- ture. He was selfish, took pride in the lowest cun- ning and had no idea of honor, and, of cour.xe, no word for expressing it. And yet, bad as he was, on the one hand, he should not be held responsible for the European vices that wore engrafted upon him, nor upon the other, should he be judged by standards resulting from centuries of a foreign civilization, or held responsible for the violation of laws of which he had no knowledge. With the coming of the white man came the fatal sorrows of the Indian. All his world was overthrown. New vices came to his character and new dangers surrounded his home. The one fixed, unchanging and unchangeable factor in his existence, upon which he could imjilicitly rely, was the land ; and now this was snatched from him by devices of which he was totally ignorant. The term "title" con- veyed no meaning to his understanding. Acting under the laws of his fathers, and doing only what he had always been taught was right, he found him- self accused of gross wrongs under another set of laws of which he had never heard, and whose claim to equity he could not understand. Under the pretense of right, he found himself most grievously wronged, and we cannot wonder that, between such opposite rules of action, the collision of princijjles quickly re- sulted in collisions of arms. The contest was inevit- able, and, whether it was carried on under the name of war or in the more quiet forms of peace, it was a contest of races, a contest of civilization against bar- barism, and the result was inevitable, — the Indian disappeared from the land. When the " Half-Moon " lay at anchor off the vil- lage of Nappeckamak, the Indians soon overcame the terror that naturally accompanied so strange aii apparition, and, putting off in their canoes, went on board in large numbers. Their curiosity knew no bounds, and was only restrained by their dread of the supernatural powers the strangers might possess. By Hudson's own statement, he himself first violated faith with them. He detained two of their number (*n the vessel, and, although they soon jumped overboard and swam to the shore, his act was nevertheless an outrage upon the universal rules of hospitality. He recorded that, when they reached the shore, they called to him "in scorn." Hudson ascended the river to Albany, holding communication with the In- dians along the way ; and so kind was their disposi- tion toward him, that he wrote of them as " the lov- ing people." On his return he came through the Highlands on the 1st of October, and anchored below the village of Sackhoes, on whose site Peekskill has been built. Here " the people of the mountains " came on board and greatly wondered at the ship and weapons, the color of the men and their dress. De- 18 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. scending the river, Hudson found that the Indians at Yonkers were prepared to resent his treatment. The young men whom he had attempted to kidnap came out with their friends in canoes and discharged their arrows at the " Half-Moon," "in recompense whereof six muskets replied and killed two or three of them." The Indians renewed the attack from a point of land (perhaps preceding the vessel to Fort Washington), but "a falcon shot killed two of them and the rest fled into the woods ; yet they manned off another canoe with nine or ten men," through which a falcon shot was sent, killing one of its occupants. Three or four more were killed by the sailors' muskets, and the " Half-Moon " " hurried down into the bay clear of all danger." Hudson returned to Holland, and reported his discoveries to his employers, the Dutch East India Company. During the following ten or twelve years many voyages were made to the shores of the Hud- son and the Sound for purposes of trade with the Indians, for their furs and to explore the country. In 1621 the Dutch West India Company was incor- porated. Two years afterward it formed trading-sta- tions at New Amsterdam and at Fort Orange, and considerable settlements were made on the sites of the future cities of New York and Albany. In 1626 Manhattan Island was sold by the Indians. In 1639 the first sale of land in Westchester County was made. It included the northern shore of Spuyten Duy vil Creek. Other sales were made by the Indians to the Dutch until, on the 8th day of August, 1699, the Sachems Sackima, Corachpa, Wechrequa, Monrechro and sundry other Indians gave a general deed confirming numerous smaller sales made to Stephanus Van Cortlandt and others, and conveying the lands that were afterward known as Cortlandt's Manor. In the mean time the Indians were beset on the eastern side of the county as well as the western. The English settlers in Connecticut gradually pushed westward, and coveted the lands of our eastern bor- der. On the 1st of July, 1640, Ponus, sagamore of Toquains, and Wascussue, sagamore of Shippan, sold to Nathan Turner, who acted for the people of New Haven, the tract known to the Indians as Rippo- wams, and which included the greater portion of what is now Fairfield County, in Connecticut, and a con- siderable area of the adjoining lands of Westchester. On the 11th of August, 165.5, Ponus and Onox, his eldest son, confirmed this sale to the inhabitants of Stamford. Subsidiary to this great sale, numerous others were made, — some of lands included in the above, and others of lands adjacent thereto, like the one made to Thomas Pell, of Fairfield, Conn., in 1654, and to Edward Jessup and John Richardson, in 1663, of tracts adjoining those sold to the Dutch in the southern part of the county. By these sales the Indians disposed of the entire area of West- chester County, except a few insignificant reserva- tions and the right to plant corn upon certain por- tions for a term of years. Many of these deeds over- lapped each other, so that some of the land was sold two or three times. This was done without any dis- honest intent on the part of the Indians. They never underatood, when giving these deeds, what they meant. As has been already said, they had no comprehension of what we call the title to land. They u'nderstood the right of occupation and use, and nothing more. The written deed had no special force in their eyes. Its phrases were incomprehen- sible. By their law the ownership ceased when the premises were deserted. If the land was not at once occupied, they could sell it again to others. If they drove the new purchasers away by force, they thereby regained ownership. Therefore, in many cases, they insisted, the settlers thought dishonestly, that their original rights remained vested in themselves, and the purchaser was compelled to repeat his purchase for the purpose of obtaining a quit-claim. It is not necessary here to specify the considera- tions named in the several deeds, as this matter was the work of the settlers, and will be more fully con- sidered in their connection. They consisted of a few hoes, hatchets, knives, kettles, articles of clothing, rum and "divers other goods." These seem very insignificant to us; but, in justice to the settlers, it must be remembered that values were very different then from what they are now. But the Indian's position is easily understood. He had no correct ideas of value. This coat would make him a king; this knife would be the pride of his life; these trin- kets delighted his eyes, or, if a worthier reason influ- enced him, he remembered how the squaws had toiled in cultivating the corn with a miserable clam- shell, and he rejoiced at the thought of Iheir labor being lightened by the iron hoe that was offered him. By simply placing his mark upon this meaningless paper, all these were secured. At best he but made a virtue of necessity, and was happy to secure these coveted trinkets, the nominal price for giving a nom- inal consent for the white man to occupy the land. When Henry Hudson sailed away from the river he had discovered, its shores re-echoed with the war- cries of a people whose confidence he had abused and whose kindred he had slain. The hostility he had awakened was not mitigated by subsequent events, and when, afterward, the traders came, mutual sus- picion and distrust were not long in bringing the clash of arms. So soon as the Dutch had made a settlement, their cattle were allowed to run at large for pasturage, and "frequently came into the corn of the Indians, which was unfenced on all sides, com- mitting great damage there. This led to complaints on their part, and finally to revenge on the cattle, without sparing even the horses." In 1626 a Weck- qujesgeek Indian, from the vicinity of Tarrytown, while on his way to Fort Amsterdam to exchange his furs, was robbed and killed by men in the em- THE INDIANS. 19 ploy of Peter Minuit, the first Dutch Director. The Weckqujesgeek was accompanied by his nephew, who was a boy, and another Indian. The Dutch were not aware of this outrage till long afterward. The boy, true to the principles of his race, treasured a revenge which he believed it to be his duty to exact in manhood. He waited no longer than to reach a warrior's age of seventeen, wheu he took some beaver- skins to barter, and, stopping at the house of a Dutchman, lie killed him while examining the goods. Having thus secured the blood atonement required for the death of a relative, he returned to his home. Governor Kieft demanded the surrender of the of- fender; but the Weckqua^sgeeks refused to give him up. There was great excitement in New Amsterdam. Expeditions to exterminate the Indians were organ- ized ; but they accomplished nothing. Finally, a treaty was concluded between the Dutch and the In- dians, the former agreeing to some matters required by the latter, on condition that the murderer should be surrendered. But the treaty was never fulfilled by either party. It was a very difficult matter to have an Indian arrested whose actions had been in strict accordance with the laws and customs of his race. Against the advice of the chief men of Man- hattan, Governor Kieft had sent a company of eighty men against the Weckqutesgeeks in March, 1642, and although they did little damage, the Indians were greatly incensed thereby. Various causes of irritation had brought the Dutch and Indians into violent collision west, of the Hudson, and finally those Indians made common cause with the Weck- qua-sgeeks, and the Dutch were swept from West- chester, and compelled to take refuge in Fort Amsterdam. " From swamps and thickets the mys- terious enemy made his sudden onset. The farmer was murdered in the open field; women and children, granted their lives, were swept off" into long captiv- ity; houses and boweiies, hay-stacks and grain, cattle and crops were all destroyed." The Indians were now satisfied, and on the 22d of April, 1643, they made a treaty of peace, in which it was declared that '"all injuries committed by the said natives against the Netherlanders, or by the Xetherlanders against said natives, shall be forgiven and forgotten forever, reciprocally promising one the other to cause no trouble the one to the other." But, in September of that year, war again broke out, beginning with the capture, by the Indians, of two boats descending the river from Fort Orange, and again the Dutch settlers were all driven into Fort Amsterdam. The Weck- quaisgeeks attacked the residence of Anne Hutchin- son, who had been driven out of New England by the Puritans, and had settled within the present bounds of Pelham, and killed her, her daughter and her son- in-law, and carried her young granddaughter into cap- tivity. She remained with the Indians four years, and was then sent to her friends. She had forgotten her native tongue, and was unwilling to leave the Indians. Throgniorton's settlement, on Throg's Neck, was also attacked and its buildings burned, while the peo- ple escaped in their boats. The position of the Dutch was perilous in the extreme, and had the In- dians known their power the whites would have been swept away. Governor Kieft now solicited aid from New England, offering a large sum for men and arms and proposing that New Netherland should be mort- gaged to secure the i)ayment of the money. They received the aid, however, of only a few English vol- unteers. Two companies, one of sixty-five and one of seventy-five men, were soon organized, and the work of retaliation commenced. Quantities of corn were captured upon Staten and Long Islands and an expedition sailed to Greenwich, in Connecticut, and marched through our eastern borders, but accom- plished nothing beyond the burning of two forsaken castles and some corn. From these ex])editions prisoners were taken to Fort Amsterdam, where they were treated with shocking cruelty, as is recorded in the " Breeden Raedt." A more formidable expedi- tion was then organized. Hearing that a large num- ber of Indians were assembled at their village on the Mehanas, near the present village of Bedford, the force was taken in sailing-vessels to Greenwich and then marched through the snow to their destination, which was reached about midnight. The village consisted of three rows of houses ranged in streets, each eighty paces long. The village was surrounded, the surprised Indians were shot down as soon as they appeared and the houses were set on fire. The in- mates preferred to perish in the flames rather than to fall by their enemy's weapons. In this merciless manner five hundred human beings were butchered. Other statements carry the number to seven hundred. The militarj' power of the Indians was now broken and thereafter warlike operations ceased. On the 30th of the following August, 1645, a general treaty of peace was concluded between the Dutch and the Indians of the Lower Hudson, and signed by their respective chiefs — Aepjen, the grand sachem of the Mohegans, representing his people. This treaty was an equitable agreement and was carefully respected. Thus was ended a war which had been carried on for over five years and in which, it was said, over sixteen hundred Indians perished. The Dutch recorded: " Our fields lie fallow and waste, our dwellings and other buildings are burnt, not a handful can be planted or sown this fall on all the abandoned j)lace8. All this through a foolish hankering after war, for it is known to all right-thinking men here that these In- dians have lived as lambs among us until a few years ago, injuring no one and affording every assistance to our nation." There are traditions of the slaughter of large num- bers of Indians at other points in the county, but they are believed to be unfounded. Mount Misery, near the Sound, hiis long been said to have derived its name from the slaughter of Indians there by the 20 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Huguenots of New Eochelle. There is no record of such an engagement, and the story is altogether im- probable. The Indians of Westchester took no jxirt in the Esopus wars of the succeeding years farther up the Hudson, nor did they engage in the French and In- dian Wars which rolled so frightfully along the bor- ders of Massachusetts and Connecticut, nor in other wars that followed elsewhere. The last appearance of Mohegan Indians under arms in Westchester County was during the Revolu- tionary War, when a company under their chief, Nimham, joined Washington's forces. On the 31s;t of August, 1778, they took part in the engage- ment at Tibbet's Brook, on the Van Cortlandt's es- tate, in Yonkers. They fought bravely and over forty of their number were killed. When Nimham saw that they were surrounded by the British horse, he called to his followers to fly, exclaiming, " I am old and will die here." Ridden down by Colonel Siracoe, he wounded that officer, and was on the point of pulling him from his horse, when he was shot by Simcoe's orderly. After their great loss, in 1645, the Indians felt that they must inevitably seek other homes. Year by year the increasing tide of settlers was incompatible with Indian occupation, and, although considerable numbers continued for a long time to remain upon the lands they had sold to the whites, they gradually wasted away, many of them moving among their friends farther north, and making Stockbridge, in Massachusetts, the headquarters of the tribe, and fi- nally the remnant that remained was removed thence to the State of Michigan. Their exit from Westchester County was very gradual, for they " loved to linger where they loved so well." At a few points they re- mained for a long time in considerable numbers, and Indian Hill, in Yorktown, became memorable as the last spot in Westchester County inhabited by a band of aborigines. Yet individual families remained still longer elsewhere. The Indians vanished from Westchester as noise- lessly as the morning mists disappear before the ad- vancing day, inclosed valleys and hidden nooks re- taining remnants after the great body had gone. They left behind them so few material evidences of their existence here that we find them only by accident or by careful search. But many of the names applied by them to mountains, streams and localities have been fortunately retained by the white settlers and their descendants, and in their associations and ap- propriateness add an interesting variety to our local nomenclature. CHAPTER III. THE DISCOVERY AND SETTLEilEXT OF ■WESTCHES- TER COUNTY. BY JAMES WOOD, A.M. President of the Westchester County Historical Society. Europeans first came to the section of coun- try now known as Westchester County in the vain endeavor to find an easy sea-way to India and Cathay that received so much of the attention of maritime nations in the fifteenth, sixteenth and seven- teenth centuries. The wealth of those far-distant lands had for many ages been borne by slow caravans across the wear}^ stretches of Central and Southern Asia, and had built prosperous cities wherever their rich spices and costly fabrics and precious jewels had found a trading-place. These visible realities had been supplemented by extravagant fables of the riches of the East, until the minds of navigators were inflamed with an eager desire to reach these inexhaustible treasures and bring them quickly home in their ships of the sea, instead of upon the "ships of the desert," as they had so slowly come before. This desire led to great events. It developed naviga- tion into a science. It took the Portuguese around the southern extremity of Africa, to which they gave its auspicious name, because it furnished a good hope of reaching India by sea. It brought Columbus across the Atlantic to discover a new world. It brought great and intrepid navigators to explore the coast of North America from Greenland to the Gulf of Mexico, and, finally,.in 1609, it brought Henry Hudson into the river that bears his name, and re- vealed our beautiful hills and fertile valleys to the gaze of civilized men. Europeans were very slow to reap a profit, in any intelligent manner, from the discovery of America. Spain first sought to gain some advantage to herself, and, in the blindest way, filled her coffers with treasure and destroyed the peoples who produced the wealth. Caring only for immediate gain, she de- spoiled the Incas and overthrew the institutions of the Aztecs, and everywhere turned prosperity into ruin. Later, she made a settlement in Florida, whose monuments still remain. The daring fishermen of France sought the shores of Newfoundland in the pursuit of their vocation, and were followed into the St. Lawrence by the flag and arms of their country, where they so tenaciously remained. England waited for the reign of Elizabeth for the enterprise that developed her greatness in every direction and planted colonies in North Carolina and Virginia, and later, showed her energy and colonizing power in the planting of New England. It was reserved for the people of the youngest nation in Europe to occupy the territory between the Euglish settlements which Hudson had first discovered, and here to trade in equity with the aborigines, and to form a set- THE DISCOVERY AND .SETTLEMENT. 21 tlement of sturdy ami intelligent people whose descendants and institutions still remain. In making their settlements, Spaniards, Frenchmen and Eng- lishmen made lofty professions of their desires to convert the heathen to the Christian faith, and, with the utmost inconsistency, they employed the musket and the sword to accomplish their purposes. The Dutch professed only a desire for trade with the In- dians, with the same propriety that the most Chris- tian nations to-day seek to extend their commerce, and hy treating them with a reasonable show of justice, they found no severe difficulties in their enterprise, while they put to shame the hollow i)re- tensions of their ambitious neighbors. The long and harassing war by which the Nether- land provinces achieved their independence of the j Si)anish crown had been one of the most remarkable in the world's history. The wealth and power of Spain were considered almost boundless. The revolt- ing )jrovinces were small in area and in population. The ' contest seemed most unequal, but the same energy, per- sistence and skill that had wrested their fertile land irom the sea defeated the armies of Spain and wore out the endurance of her sovereigns, until, on the 9th of April, 1609, the protracted struggle ended and the independence of the Netherlands was practi- cally acknowledged. During all the contest the Dutch had shown their superiority upon the ocean. Their vessels carried on a profitable commerce in every sea and jiushed into that rich trade with the ! East which had been especially denied them by j Spain. To carry on this important trade the East i India Company had been incorporated in 1602. | Profitable as were their voyages around the Cape of Good Hope, they yet dreamed there might be a shorter route for their vessels, and one in which they would be less exposed to attack. The long-cherished possi- bility of a northwest passage to the Indian seas was still entertained. Opportunely, an English navigator, Henry Hudson, who had made two voyages to this ever disappointing field of discovery, offered his ser- vices. The ofiier was accepted, and a yacht of eighty tons burden, the Half-Moon, was equipped for a voyage, manned by a mixed crew of Dutch and Eng- lish sailors, numbering twenty, and sailed from Am- sterdam on the 4th of April, 1609, five days before the truce with Spain was signed. Striking the American coast at Nova Scotia, Hudson skirted the shores of Maine and Cape Cod and next reached the mouth of Chesapeake Bay, and, turning northward, passed the coast of Maryland and entered Delaware Bay. Again standing northward, on the 2d of September he sighted the highlands of Navesinck, " a very good land to fall in with and a pleasant land to see," and on the following day he rounded Sandy Hook and entered the lower bay. Hudson spent ten days in exploring the adjacent waters. Then, proceeding up the majestic river that opened before him, on the 13th the Half-Moon was anchored opposite the site of the i)resent city of Yonkers. The voyage was continued as far as the river was found navigable, when Hudson returned, having considerable inter- course with the Indians by the way, until, as he passed our shores and re-entered New York Bay, his men wantonly killed nine of their number. Just one month from the day Hudson arrived inside Sandy Hook the Half-Moon sailed out again to the ocean. On the 7th of November they reached Dart- month, in Devonshire, England, and there the Half- Moon wintered, Hudson sending a report of his discoveries to his employers in Holland. England, becoming jealous of the advantages that might accrue to her maritime rival by these discoveries, prevented Hudson from returning to Holland, and his connec- tion with the East India Company ended. He never revisited the river that makes his name immortal, but under English patronage he continued the vain search for a sea-way to India and lost his life in Hud- son's Bay in 1611. The company abandoned all effort to discover a northwest passage, and made no CAPTAIN HEXRY HUDSON. attempt to utilize the discoveries that had thus been made. The Half-Moon, surviving her famous com- mander, was subsequently sent upon a voyage to the East Indies, and was wrecked in 1615 on the island of Mauritius. Although the East India Company gave no further attention to the region their enterprise had discovered, it was impossible for the active Hollanders not to make an effort to gain some advantage from it. The fur trade had already become an important interest with the Dutch. During the war with Spain they had opened and developed a profitable interchange ot commodities with the countries of the Baltic, and they had become the chief distributors of Russian furs to the countries of Europe. Naturally, they soon turned their attention to the prosecution of the fur trade with the Indians of the Hudson River, where beaver, otter and other valuable fur-bearing animals were abundant. Merchants fitted out vessels and sent them across the ocean under such skillful commanders as the for- mer mate of the Half-Moon and Captains Chris- HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. tiaensen, Block, De Witt and May. Further explora- tions of the coast were made, as well as valuable car- goes obtained. Depots for the collection of furs, and a friendly and advantageous intercourse with the In- dians, were established. Captain Block's vessel, the "Tiger," was accidentally burned in Xew York Bay, in 1613, and, without aid from Holland, the intrepid commander and his crew built the first vessel, the ' Restless," ever launched upon American waters. To shelter them, while engaged in the work, the first houses were erected upon Manhattan Island. During the winter the Indians supplied them " with food and all kinds of necessaries." In the " Restless " Block sailed boldly through the rushing currents of the East River, naming its most dangerous portion " Hell Gate," after a similar situa. tion in a branch of the Scheldt, near Hulst, in Zea- land, called " Hellegat." He explored our shore of Long Island Sound, and continued eastward to Cape Cod. The importance of these enterprises increased so that the States-General passed ordinances regulat. ing the trade, and, in 1614, granted a charter to the traders, in which the country was first called " New Netherland." The merchants to whom the charter was granted were not united as a corporation, but were merely participants in a limited monopoly, which they enjoyed in common. They had no powers of government, as they did not contemplate any perma- nent colonization. Their charter expired by its own limitation on the 1st of January, 1618. By that time trading ports had been established on Manhattan Island and upon Castle Island, near Albany, and doubtless considerable trading had been done with the Indians of Westchester County, but no attempt at settlement had yet been made. There was now much uncertainty as to the best course to pursue in relation to this new territory, whose importance to the traders was daily increasing. Various propositions were con- sidered and dismissed, until, in 1621, the West India Company was organized, and received a charter of al- most unlimited powers of government, while it was required to "advance the peopling of this fruitful and unsettled part, and do all that the service of those countries and the profit and increase of trade shall re- quire." The internal organization of the company proved a tedious matter, and it was not until June, 1623, that the plans were perfected and the articles of government were approved by the States-General. Then active preparations were made for the increase of the trade with the Indians and for making a per- manent settlement upon the yet unoccupied lands. Circumstances at home had ])rovided excellejit emi- grants to undertake the hardships of a settlement in the New World. The protracted struggle with Spain had aroused strong religious animosities. The con- test had been largely limited by religious sentiment. Spain was closely attached to the Catholic Church, and so were the southern Netherland provinces of Na- mur and Hainault, Luxemburg and Limburg, which had refused to join Holland and Zealand in forming the United Netherlands. The northern provinces, which had gained their independence, were strongly Protestant. The Protestants of these Belgic provinces were compelled to leave their homes and seek a resi- dence elswhere. Where should they go? Many es- tablished themselves in England and enriched that country with their profitable industries. Opportune- ly, the West India Company invited settlers to New Netherland. Considerable numbers embraced the offer, and thus the Walloons became the first perma- nent residents upon the shores of the Hudson, and the first tillers of the soil. They spoke the French lan- guage, and were chiefly united with the Hollanders in their common hatred of the Spanish rule. They came here to establish homes for themselves and their children, while the Dutch were chiefly interested in the profits of the fur trade. It thus occurred that the first New Netherland settlement was in its character more Walloon than Dutch. The refugees from the southern provinces, with a number of Huguenots from France, at first desired to join one of the English settlements in America, and made overtures to this end, but these were not favor- ably received. When the West India Company gladly accepted them as emigrants to their domain, speedy jjre- parations were made for their departure, and in March, 1623, the new ship "New Netherland," under Captain May, sailed from the Texel with a company of thirty families on board. They reached their destination early in the month of May, in good time to plant such crops as would supply them with necessary food. The few huts erected by Block, ten years before, afforded them shelter. Having the interest of the fur trade more in view than the welfare of the colonists, the members of the company were, unfortunately, dis- persed, some going to the South, or Delaware River, and others to Castle Island, near Albany, where Fort Nassau was soon afterward built. May had been ap- pointed Director. The settlers who went to the South River soon returned. Other Walloons came from Holland. In December, 1625, Peter Minuit, himself a Walloon, was appointed Director-General, and Manhattan Island and the adjacent lands soon con- tained an energetic colony of about three hundred souls. It is probable that the settlers soon tilled the lands upon the northern shores of the Harlem River, as well as the upper portions of Manhattan Island. In the year 1628, Jonas Michaelius, a clergyman of the Re- formed Church, came to New Amsterdam and held religious services in both the Dutch and French lan- guages. He wrote of the settlers and their church at- tendance : — " Some of them live far away and could not come on account of the heavy rains and storms." This, doubtless, referred to those who lived along the Harlem, as well as those from across the East River. Unfortunately, no records of the colony, for the first fifteen years after its establishment, have been pre- THE DISCOVERY AND SETTLEMENT. 23 served, so that we are forced to draw inferences from sucli collateral statements. Minuit showed energy and vigor in his administra- tion. To assist him, a council was appointed, with legislative and judicial powers. There was also u secretary of the province and a sheriff. It was soon seen that the rights of the Indians must be respected, as being superior to any European right of discovery and occupation. Minuit, therefore, very justly opened negotiations with them for the purchase of Manhattan Island, and they relinquished their claims thereto " for the value of sixty guilders," which was equivalent to about twenty-four dollars of our money In the light of subsequent events this sum seems most absurdly insignificant, but, under the circumstances, the amount was reasonable and the transaction honor- able. The West India Company wisely encouraged emigration. They brought over horses, cattle and poultry for the use of the settlers. Their farms, called " boweries," showed prosperity. An English observer wrote that the emigrants, "though they be not many, are well chosen, and known to be useful and serviceable, and they (the company) second them with seasonable and fit supplies, cherishing them as carefully as their own families." But the enter- prise drew heavily upon the company's treasury, and they soon began to devise means by which private parties might be induced to aid emigration on their own account. At length, for this purpose, it was concluded to endeavor to plant in America a modified feudalism. The feudal system had not flourished in Holland. The free spirit and intelligence of its peo- ple were adverse to it. True, the land was mainly in the hands of great owners, but those who occupied them paid a rental, instead of military service, and regarded the owner merely as a landlord, and not as a master. With the increase of wealth from trade and manufactures, the rich merchants were unable at home to satisfy their desires for landed estates, and hence it was proposed to offer them lands in New Netherland. On June 7, 1629, the West India Company issued its " Charter of Privileges and Ex- emptions," by which any member of the company who should purchase land of the Indians, and found a colony of fifty persons over fifteen years of age, should have a grant of sixteen miles along one bank or eight miles on each bank of any navigable river, and as far inland as the situation would permit. They received the title of Patroon, and were the lords of the people, as well as of the land. The Patroon's authority over his manor was similar to that of a baron in the Mid- dle Ages. He could engage in every trade except that in furs, which was reserved for the conipany ex- clusively. The Patroons were required to make prompt provision for the support of a mmister and a schoolmaster. This creation of a second monopoly, within that of the company itself, proved most unfortunate. The wealthy directors took immediate advantage of the company's action before the other share-holders could avail themselves of its privilege, and at once the most desirable territory was seized by a few. Disagree- ments and dissensions speedily followed. Intelligent emigrants were afraid to place themselves under the control of such grasping masters. Instead of encour- aging the settlement of the country, it greatly re- tarded it, and probably deferred for fifty years the considerable peopling of Westchester County along the Harlem and Hudson Rivers. Manhattan Island was reserved for the company. The first purchase of Indian lands north of Harlem River was made by the West India Company in 1G39. Its bounds were poorly defined. White settlers speedily occupied portions of this tract. They made another purchase of land to the east of this tract in 1640. Herr Broux made a purchase along the river that bears his name in the following year. The next purchase was made in 1646 by Adriaeu Von der Donck, who had been educated at the University of Leyden, and had been admitted to prac- tice in the Supreme Court of Holland. He was the first lawyer who came to New Netherland. He at once received a patent from the company, his lands extending for sixteen miles along the Hudson norrh of Manhattan Island, and eastward to the Bronx River. It was called Donck's Colony, and its pro- prietor, invested with all the rights and privileges contained in the charter of 1629, became a member of the order of Patroons. In 1650 a contract was made by the West India Company, with Van der Donck and others, for the transportation of two hundred persons to New Netherland. Yonkers soon became a place of considerable trade with the Indians, and vessels were here loaded for old Amsterdam. Disputes between the company and the Patroons now became frequent and bitter. Van der Donck, from his legal skill, was prominent in these, and, in 1652, he repaired to Amsterdam to personally ap- pear before the college of the company. It was soon found that the privileges conferred upon the Patroons had been too liberally bestowed. Good Peter Minuit was recalled in 1631 on the charge of hav- ing been too easy with the newly- created nobility. He was succeeded by Van Tvviller, and he, in turn, by Wil- liam Kieft. During Kieft's administration an Indian war, re- sulting from the murder of an Indian, as is related in the previous chapter, befel New Netherland, and drove the white settlers from Westchester County and threatened the complete destruction of the col- ony. Kieft's administration proved unfortunate for the company. It was considered that he had unneces- sarily brought on the disastrous war with the Indians, and he had done nothing to remedy the ditficulties with the Patroons. The financial affairs of the colony ' were also unsatisfactory. Very serious were the dis- 24 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. oussions in the college of the company as to the cor- rection of the existing evils. Finally new regulations were adopted, and Peter Stuyvesant was appointed Director-General. It was hoped that he would also prove a " Eedresser-General." He came to Xew Xeth- erland in 1646 and assumed the reins of the govern- ment as the successor of Kieft. Stuyvesant's administration was an energetic one on the part of the Director-General, but he was beset with difficulties on every hand. He was anxious to insist on the Dutch claim to all the territory from the Connecticut to the Delaware Rivers, which the English settlers were as emphatic in denying. The English pushed their settlements almost to the Har- lem River. On Long Island they claimed entire independence of New Netherland. Stuyvesant had PETEK ST U Y \-ES A N J . further troubles with the Indians up the Hudson. The internal affairs of his government were very jar- ring. Jealousies and disputes were frequent. He was stern in his assertion of authority, but that au- thority was but poorly respected. To add to his difficultie-', lie was very insufficiently supported by the college of the company in Amsterdam. The un- fortunate organization of the companj' became more and more apparent. New Netherland was a financial burden. When, therefore, in 1664, in utter disregard of the rights and authority of the Dutch, the King of England gave to his brother, the Duke of York and Albany, the territory between the Connecticut and Delaware Rivers, and Richard Nichols, as lieuten- ant-governor, with a fleet of four ships and four hundred men, appeared before New Amsterdam, the colony was ripe for a change, and, despite the earnest i^rotests of Stuyvesant, quietly surrendered, and the Dutch authority ceased. It was restored, for a short period only, in 1673. Although the English now ruled, and New Netherland became New York, the Dutch inhabitants and Dutch institutions remained, and the English were careful to respect the rights and privileges that had existed under their government. The grants made to the Patroons were not interfered with. Adriaen Van der Donck died in 1655, leaving to his wife the colony of Yonkers. She subsequently married Hugh O'Neal e. In 1666, Governor Nichols granted a patent to Hugh O'Neale and Mary, his wife, confirm- ing the rights of Van der Donck. There were a number of subsequent transfers of the title to these lands, until they became vested in Frederick Phil- ipse, and a royal charter confirming the same was I granted in 1693. Frederick Philipse was from East Friesland, in Holland, and had emigrated to New I Amsterdam at an early day, becoming a successful merchant there. He purchased land of the Indians north of Y^onkers in 1681, 1682 and 1684, including the jjresent township of Greenburgh. In 1680 and 1684 he purchased portions of the township of Mount Pleasant, and in 1685 he purchased the lauds of the present township of Ossining. Thus the great tract of the Philipse manor was brought into an individual ownership. North of the Croton River the Indians sold lands to a number of parties at various dates. The titles to the most of these lands were afterward secured by Stephanus Van Cortlandt, and were confirmed to him by royal charter in 1697. The Van Courtlandt manor, containing eighty-three thousand acres of land, was thus established, and was held by feudal tenure, requiring an annual payment to the crown.' Under the fostering care of the Philipse and Van Courtlandt families, the settlement of the lands along the Hudson rapidly progressed. English families mingled with the Dutch to a considerable extent, but the Holland emigrants greatly, outnumbered them, so that, in the people and their habits, customs and character, the settlements along the Hudson were active with the occupations and reflected the quiet scenes of the homes that had been left behind the dykes that inclosed the mouths of the Rhine and shut out the Nortli Sea. The Dutch settlers in Westchester County brought hither many of the best qualities that contribute to good citizenship. They were an industrious race, and the situation of their country at home had com- pelled them to keep their native industry in constant exercise. Their frugality equaled their industry. No one lived beyond his means, and each year some- thing was added to the accumulated capital. The individual was self-reliant, and yet knew the advan- 1 Tlie regulations of tlie manoi-s and tlieir history will be given in a siibseiiuent chapter, prepared by Edward F. de Lancey. THE DISCOVERY AND SETTLEMENT. 25 tages of concerted action for the common good. Their honesty was proverbial. They were thor- oughly imbued with the democratic spirit that, with the freedom of the individual, respected fully both the natural and the acquired rights of others. They valued education. In Holland their free-school system was the best in Europe. Women occupied an exceptionally honorable position, both in society and in the management of afiairs, so that they ably assisted in the business of the family in training their children to usefulness and in contributing to the welfare of the community. The Dutch were stead- fast in their religious faith, and had a high regard for morality. Such a people lay solid foundations for their social and political institutions, and they stamped most wholesome and enduring impressions upon the settle- ments of Westchester County. The English SETTLEJtEXX. — The introduction of the Reformation into England by Henry VHI. was more nominal than real, and left to succeeding reigns the settlement of many of the great questions in- volved. The reign of Elizabeth saw the storm steadily gathering, while that of James I. was a time of con- tinual turmoil and strife. The chief disputes were among the Protestants themselves, and mainly con- cerned the extent to which the changes should go. The people abandoned themselves to the considera- tion of questions of civil and religious liberty. Dis- senters returning from the Continent threw their ad- vanced ideas into the arena of public discussion. During the Commonwealth the spirit of controversy seemed to possess all classes. Questions of religion divided the time with state affairs in the discussions of Parliament. This spirit separated the English people into hostile camps and produced a numerous brood of religious sects. One of the most important results of all this tur- moil was the banishment from England, in the early part of the seventeenth century, of a ship-load of yeomen. Among the Dissenters, those taking the most ex- treme positions were called Puritans, because of their efforts to purify the Protestant Church. Compelled to leave their homes, a little company of these sought refuge in Holland. There they remained for twelve years, secure in religious liberty, but dissatisfied with their situation. At one time they looked toward emigrating to New Netherland, and at another to Virginia, but, finally, arrangements were completed for a more northern location, and, in 1620, they crossed the Atlantic and commenced the Massachu- setts settlement. Their trials and sufferings in the new home were varied and severe. The settlement grew, however, and it was not long before the spirit of adventure and the desire for better lands led some of them to look for homes in other sections. The In- dians had told them of the fertile soil along the Con- necticut River, and, in 1633, a few of their number 3 came hither. Lord Say and Seal, Lord Brook and others obtained a patent from the British crown for this region, and, in 1636, under their authority, John Winthrop, son of the Governor of Massachusetts, brought a well-equipped company, who formed settle- ments along the river. In 1637 a fresh colony from England arrived in Boston. It was under the general charge of Theophilus Eaton, with John Davenport, a clergyman of some note from London, as their spiritual adviser. They were a company of wealth and respectability. Remaining but a short time at Boston, they came to Connecticut and securely planted the New Haven colony in the spring of 1638. The land had been purchased from the Indians in the preceding autumn. So soon as they were com- fortably established they desired to enlarge their borders, and on the 1st of July, 1640, Nathan Turner, on behalf of the people of New Haven, pur- chased of the Indians the tract known as Rippowams, extending westward along the Sound and sixteen miles inland. It included a portion of Westchester County. A settlement was soon made at Stamford and another at Greenwich. On November 14, 1654, Thomas Pell, of Fairfield, Conn., purchased of the Indians the lauds lying immediately east of those Occupied by the Dutch, and which were afterward included in Pelham manor. The Dutch were greatly disturbed thereby. Tliirt}' years later the Indians conveyed a portion of these lands to the iniiabitants of Westchester. In 1660, 1661 and 1662, John Budd, Peter Disbrow, John Coe and Thomas Stedwell made purchases from the Indians of lands along the Sound, west of Greenwich, included in the southeastern portion of Westchester County. In 1661, John Rich- bell, of the island of Barbadoes, West Indies, pur- chased of the Indians a tract lying between the lands purchased by Pell and those just mentioned, and ex- tending a long distance inland. His title to this was confirmed by lettera patent issued by Governor Love- lace in 1668. In 1696 the widow of John Richbell conveyed these lands to Colonel Caleb Heathcote, who also made additional purchases of the Indians. All these were confirmed by a royal patent in 1701, creating the lordship and manor of Scarsdale, which included the present towns of Mamaroneck and Scars- dale and portions of White Plains, North Castle and New Castle. We thus see that all the lands of the county bor- dering upon Long Island Sound had come into the hands of the English proprietors, regardless of the claims of the Dutch West India Company, under their purchase from the Indians in 1640. These purchases were followed by the coming of English settlers, nearly all of whom were from Con- necticut. But they iiad been preceded by others who had here sought a refuge from religious intolerance and persecution. Anne Hutchinson, with her hus- band, William, and their children, had come to Boston 26 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTEE COUNTY. in 1634. She was the daughter of the Kev. Francis Marbury, of Lincolnshire, England. By her mother, she was connected with the family of the poet Dryden. Her religious views did not harmonize with those of the Puritans, and she was driven out of the colony. She first went to Rhode Island, but afterward sought peace and security near the Dutch settlement in New Netherland. She settled with her family upon Pelham Neck in 1642. Soon afterward John Throckmorton and thirty-five families, who found the intolerance of the Puritans unendurable, asked permission of the Dutch authorities to settle near them. Their request was granted, and they lo- cated upon what is now known as Throg's Neck, in the town of Westchester. The Dutch called this section Vredeland — the land of peace. In the disastrous Indian war, that threatened the destruction of the Dutch settlement and so alarmed Governor Kieft, the Indians murdered Mrs. Hutchinson and her family, except a young granddaughter, who was carried into captivity, but was afterward restored. They also at- tacked Throckmorton's settlement, destroyed the buildings and cattle and compelled the people to tlee to their boats for .safety. The English settlements along the Sound steadily grew and soon assumed considerable importance. Locations were chosen at the heads of the numerous bays putting in from the Sound, where water com- munication was available and where the surrounding lands could be easily reached. The old " Westchester Path " had long been used by the Indians and fur- nished the whites with the best inland communica- tion. The fields that the Indians had cultivated were already cleared for the whites, and enabled them at once to raise the necessary food for their support. Gradually the settlers pushed inland and made additional purchases from the Indians. In 1683 the inhabitants of Rye bought lands about White Plains. Their claims to these were disputed by John Richbell; but Rye settlers went upon them and considered White Plains a portion of their ter- ritory. While the southeastern portions of Westchester County were being peopled from Connecticut, the more northern portions also received similar atten- tion. The people of Stamford followed the Indian trail leading inland, and came to the attractive lands at the bend of the Mianus River, near the present village of Bedford, where the Indians had a village and cultivated their fields of maize, pumpkins and sieva beans. They purchased of the Indians, in 1655, lands about Bedford in addition to those pur- chased by Nathan Turner, in 1640, and, subsequently, other minor purchases were made. In 1680 the tract known as the Hop Ground was bought, and John Cross, going up from Stamford to inspect it, described the river that has since borne his name. In the spring of 1681 twenty-four Stamford men and their families moved to these lands, and the village of Bedford was begun. Poundridge and Salem were settled from the same source. While the growth of these settlements was not rapid, it was steady and healthful. The people grad- ually became rooted to the soil. After wandering so far, they were content to remain in the quiet enjoy- ment of their new homes. Nearly all those who set- tled in the eastern portion of the county were Dis- senters, who afterwards became Presbyterians when that order of church government was established. They considered themselves a part of the colony of Connecticut and their location within the Connecti- cut jurisdiction. The boundary between the two colonies was not then established, and when New York attempted to enforce its claim to this section, the people of Rye, White Plains and Bedford stoutly protested. They long sent delegates to the Connec- ticut Assembly and were an integral portion of that people. Continued controversies with the Dutch and with the English authorities of New. York had led them to entertain no friendly feeling toward that col- ony, and when at length they were compelled to sub- mit to its authority they felt sorely aggrieved. They were an intelligent, sturdy, enterprising and pious people, with the true Puritan sternness of morals and devotion to duty. Wherever they located, the church and the school-house were immediately erected. England never sent across the Atlantic bet- ter material for planting her colonies and extending her civilization. Beside the Puritans, who came fi-om Connecticut, another English element came into Westchester County after the transfer of New York to the Eng- lish, in 1664. The Governors sent over by the Duke of York were accompanied by numerous officers and retainers, who were no sooner established in their new positions than they began to look about them for lands for themselves and their families. Naturally, Westchester County offered an inviting field for their purpose and many of them settled there. They were nearly all Episcopalians, and through their influence many of the Protestant Episcopal Churches upon Manhattan Island and in this county were established. They were compelled to purchase lands from those who had obtained titles before them. The Philipse and Yan Cortlandt manors occupied the territory along the Hudson and across the northern portion of the county, north of the Croton River, and the New Eng- land purchases covered all the lands along the Sound and up the Connecticut border. But the idea was somehow started among the New York oflScials that there was still some unoccupied and unclaimed terri- tory in the central portion of the county. This was hastily sought for by numerous parties, and land grants and patents were obtained far in excess of the available lands, and which overlapped each other in a manner that makes it impossible now to map them. The most of these centred about the present town of North Castle. THE DISCOVERY AND SETTLEMENT. 27 The Huguenot Settlement. — Simultaneously with Luther's work in Germany thereformed ideas were widely spread in France. They were born on French soil, but were greatly strengthened by the progress of the Reformation in Germany, and grew rapidly un- der the active influences of Geneva. French Prot- estants were not long in drawing into two classes, — the Lutherans and the Huguenots. Their numbers increased so rapidly that, in the reign of Henry II., they entertained hopes of becoming the dominant political party, aided, as they were, by the fact that several members of the royal family and numerous high oflicials were united with them. Their greatest strength was with the u])per classes. lu 1569 it was recorded that one-thirtieth of the common folk and one-third of the nobles were Huguenots. The union of political ambition and religious faith was unfor- tunate, but unavoidable in that age. The more nearly even the balance of power, the more eager were the rivalries and the more bitter the animosities. Now the Protestants were persecuted and then they were encouraged. In 1572 the King's sister became the wife of Henry of Nararre, who was the Huguenot leader. The lead- ing Protestants were invited to Paris to the nuptials, where, on the night of St. Bartholomew, a general massacre of the Protestants was begun, instigated by Catharine de Medici, the Queen mother. The Hu- guenots stoutly defended themselves throughout France, although great numbers were slain. The tide of their fortunes constantly ebbed and flowed. In 1598, Henry IV. issued the famous Edict of Nantes, which was helpful to both Catholics and Protestants, reproducing the more favorable and tolerant of for- mer edicts. Under Louis XIII. their rights were again attacked, which led to an unlucky league with England, and resulted in the siege and capitulation of their city of Rochelle. Then their treatment was again tolerant, and they loyally fought for Louis XIV., which that sovereign illy repaid by the revo- cation of the Edict of Nantes, in 1685. Before this crowning injustice great numbers had escaped from their inhospitable country. Over one million of the best and thriftiest citizens of the land now sought refuge elsewhere, and more than one-half of the commercial and manufacturing industries of the kingdom were crushed, resulting in stagnation and dis- tress on every hand. Thus France at once suffered for her cruelty and wrong. The Huguenots scattered throughout the world, blessing every country they visited by the addition of their intelligence, refinement, virtue and industry. Great numbers went to England, causing silk manu- facture and other important industries to flourish there; others went to Ireland, making her linen and poplin manufactures the most important in the world; some went to Switzerland and some to Germany, and many crossed the Atlantic to seek peaceful homes and assured liberty in the New World. Their trials and sufferings and heroic steadfastness, with the blessings they carried to many lands, make the story of the Huguenots one of the saddest and, at the same time, one of the brightest known to his- tory. Of those who crossed the Atlantic, many settled in South Carolina, and gave to that colony and State much of their prominence. A few settled in Virginia and a few in Delaware and Pennsylvania, and more in Maryland. A considerable number went to Massa- chusetts ; an important settlement was made by them in Ulster County, N. Y., and a goodly number came to Westchester County. As has already been stated, the purchase of lands from the Indians by Thomas Pell, of Fairfield, Conn., was confirmed to him by Governor Nichols, in 1666. In 1669, Thomas Pell devised the manor of Pelham to his nephew, John Pell, and this was con- firmed by Governor Dougan in 1687. At this time a remarkable man had attained ])rominence in the city of New York, — Jacob Leisler — who was a native of Germany. He came to America in 1660 as a private soldier in the service of the Dutch West India Com- pany. Leaving the army, he engaged in the Indian trade, with great success, and acquired a considerable fortune. Under Dougan's administration, in 1683, he was appointed one of the commissioners of the Admi- ralty Court, and, when Dougan was succeeded by Lieutenant-Governor Nicholson, Leisler, as captain of the militia, intimidated Nicholson so that he left the province and went to England. A committee of safety appointed Leisler "Com- mander-in-Chief of the Province," and when, in De- cember, 1689, a communication was received from the English crown, addressed "to such as, for the time being, takes care for preserving the peace and admin- istering the laws in his majesty's province of New York," Leisler construed it as an appointment of him- self as the King's Lieutenant-Governor. He assumed the dignity and authority of this position, and when, in the spring, Slaughter arrived with a commission as Governor, Leisler questioned his identity and refused him recognition. He was arrested and imprisoned, tried for treason, and most unjustly condemned, and was executed on the 17th of May, 1691. On the 20th of September, while Leisler was exer- cising the full power of a Governor in all civil and mrlitary matters, John Pell, lord of the manor of Pel- ham, conveyed to him for the consideration of six- teen hundred and seventy-five pounds and five shillings sterling, "all that tract of land lying and being within said manor of Pelham, containing six thousand acres of land, and also one hundred acres of land more, which the said John Pell and Rachel, his wife, do freely give and grant for the French church erected, or to be erected," etc. This tract con- stitutes the present township of New Rochelle. Leisler had shown in New York great interest in the Protestant religion, and to him a company of 28 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Huguenots, who had been eight years in England, made application to secure for them a location in the province of New York. Their attention had been at- tracted to this locality in previous years. Individual Huguenots had purchased several parcels of land here in 1686 and succeeding years, when their set- tlement began. Leisler's purchase was made for the Huguenots. In the following year he conveyed these lands to them, when his connection with the settle- ment ceased. Some of the Huguenots came here by way of the West Indies, but the greater portion came from Eng- land. The main company landed at what is known as Bonnefoy's Point, in Echo Bay, adjoining Daven- port's Neck. Numbers continued to arrive until the year 1700. Their new home was named in honor of that from which many of them had been driven, — the city of La Rochelle, in France. Bound together by the memories of bitter suffer- ings, endured in common by their religious interests and by warm friendships, and separated from their neighbors by a different language, the Huguenots long remained a compact body in New Rochelle. In after- years numbers settled in the northern portions of the county, where many of their names are still found. The influence of the Huguenots upon the people of Westchester County has been important. Their earnest religious faith, their sterling integrity, their energy of character and their intelligence, refinement and courtesy have left most valuable impressions that still remain. The Quaker Settlement. — The Society of Friends, called Quakers, was the outcome of the religious awakening that followed the Reformation in England. The changes from the Roman Catholic Church were variously graduated by different Pro- testant believers. The Quakers carried the princi- ples of the Reformation to their logical conclusion. Claiming the complete spirituality of the gospel dis- ' pensation, they denied all outward rites and cere- monies, and insisted that the types' of the Jewish ritual were fulfilled and ended in Christ. They acknowledged no order of priesthood but the uni- versal priesthood of believers. They held that Christ as the head of His church chose and commissioned whom He would to preach His gospel, and that no human ordination was of any avail ; and they taught the doctrine of the immediate and perceptible in- fluence of the Holy Spirit upon the individual soul of man. These positions were so radical that many good people thought them dangerously wild, and, as a consequence, the Quakers were almost everywhere persecuted. George Fox, the founder of the sect, was born in Leicestershire, England, in 1G24. After he began to preach, in 1647, his life was little more than a journey from one prison to another. But this attracted the public attention, so that great numbers flocked to hear | him when opportunity offered. His converts came from ' nearly every rank of society, and the kingdom seemed to swarm with them. Quakers first came to America in 1656. They at- tempted to settle in Massachusetts. The story of their persecutions there is well known. Remembering the age and the temper of the times, we must judge these persecutions leniently. From the Puritan standpoint, the Quaker had no right to go there. The Puritans had come to Massachusetts to establish a religious, not a civil, commonwealth. Only members of their church were eligible to citizenship. The Quakers claimed that, as Englishmen, they had a legal right to visit and to live wherever the English flag pro- claimed English j urisdiction. This claim rested upon the clause in the Massachusetts charter which ex- pressly guaranteed " all liberties and immunities of free and natural subjects of the realm to all English- men 'which shall go to and inhabit' Massachusetts, or which shall happen to be born there, or on the seas in going thither or returning from thence." The re- sult of the contest was one of those sad episodes in history over which, in this age, it is better to throw the mantle of charity, with devout thankfulness that our lot is cast in better times. The persecutions of the Quakers in Massachusetts turned the stream that continued to cross the Atlantic, and led to their settlement in Westchester County. That settlement was almost entirely made by the way of Long Island. Very naturally, the Quakers looked to the Dutch for religious toleration. The Puritans themselves had gone to Holland to find religious lib- erty when they had been compelled to flee from Eng- land. Many others besides Friends came to Long Island from Massachusetts to escape the religious re- straint there. The first of these, who afterward be- came connected with Friends, was Lady Deborah Moody. She settled at Lynn, in Massachusetts, iu 1640, and received a grant of four hundred acres of land. Governor Winthrop thus speaks of her in his journal : " In 1643, Lady Moody was in the colony of Massachusetts, a wise and anciently religious woman, and being taken with the error of denying baptism to infants, was dealt withal by many of the elders and others, and admonished by the church of Salem, whereof she was a member, but persisting still, and to avoid further trouble, etc., she removed to the Dutch, against the advice of her friends." On the 19th of December, 1645, Governor Kieft, of New Amsterdam, issued a general patent for the town of Gravesend, Long Island, to Lady Deborah Moody, Sir Henry Moody, her son, George Baxter and James Hubbard, their heirs and successors, " to have and enjoy free lib- erty of conscience, according to the customs and man- ners of Holland, without molestation." Gravesend was planted entirely by English settlers from Massa- chusetts, and, unlike the "five Dutch towns," which constituted the rest of Kings County, the records, which are still well preserved, were kept from the com- mencement of the settlement in the English language. THE DISCOVERY AND SETTLEMENT. 29 Friends came to Gravesend in considerable numbers in 1657. Many of the inhabitants embraced their doctrines, and their first religious meeting on Long Island was established there. It was recorded that " meetings were held at the house of Lady Moody, who managed all things with such prudence and ob- servance of time and place as to give no offense to any person of another religion ; so she and her people re- mained free from molestation." Flushing was similarly settled by refugees from Massachusetts. They were careful to have inserted in their charter, granted by Governor Kieft on the 10th of October, 1645, a clause permitting them " to have and enjoy the liberty of conscience according to the manner and custom of Holland, withtmt molesta- tion from any magistrate- or any ecclesiastical minis- ter that may pretend jurisdiction over them." In 1657 Friends came to Flushing with several able preachers among their number. Many of the other inhabitants attended their meetings. Governor Stuy- vesant had failed in his efforts to induce the people to accept and support a minister whom he had sent there, and he soon commenced a persecution of the Quakers only second to that so much better known in Massachusetts. In the official instructions given by the directors of the Dutch West India Company, the official oath required '" the maintenance of the Re- formed Religion in conformity to the word and the decrees of the Synod of Dordrecht, and not to tolerate in public any other sect." In this the Governor had an excuse for his treat- ment of the Quakers. Some were imprisoned for a long time. Some were severely flogged, and a prom- inent member was sent to Holland to be tried before the company's college. He was at once released by the college and returned to his home, while a severe reprimand wassenttoStuyvesant. An ordinanceof the New Amsterdam Council, enacted in 1662, provided severe penalties for holding public meetings for wor- iilton's Hist. N. Y., 27. vided between themselves this western world. These principles formed the basis of a conventional inter- national law wliich has been always observed in America. They define with precision, to whom the Indians could dispose of their rights to dominion and to the soil, and to whom they could not. They have been laid down by Chancellor Kent and Chief Justice Marshall in the highest courts of this State and the United States.'^ These decisions are so admirably treated by Moul- ton, in that most valuable fragment of his " History of New York " Mvhich is all that his early and la- mented death has left to us, that his statement a little abridged will be almost all that is necessary to say on this subject here. " Upon the discovery of this continent the great na- tions of Europe, eager to appropriate as much of it as possible and conceiving that the character and re- ligion of its inhabitants afforded an apology for con- sidering them as a people, over whom the superior DAVID PIETERSEN DE VRIES. genius of Europe might claim an ascendancy, adopted, as by a common consent, this principle, — " First, that discovery gave title to the government, by whose subjects, or under whose authority it was made, against all other European governments, which title might be consummated by possession. Hence if the country be discovered and possessed by emigrants of an existing acknowledged government, the pos- session is deemed taken for the Nation, and title must be derived from the sovereign in whom the power to dispose of vacant territories is vested by law. '^Secondly, Eesulting from this principle was that of the sole right of the discoverer to acquire the soil from the Natives, and establish settlements, either by pur- chase or by conquest. Hence also the exclusive right cannot exist in government and at the same time in private individuals ; and hence also, — "Thirdly, The Natives were recognized as rightful occupants, but their power to dispose of the soil at their own will to whomsoever they pleased, was 2In Goodell v. Jackson, 20 Johnson, G93, and JoIidsod i: Graham's Lessee v. Mcintosh, 8th Wheaton, 543. 'P. 301, Ac. 36 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. denied by the original fundamental principle, that discovery gave exclusive title to those who made it. " Fourthly, The ultimate dominion was asserted, and, as a consequence, a power to grant the soil while yet in the possession of the Natives. Hence, such do- minion was incompatible with an absolute and com- plete title in the Indians. Consequently thej' had no right to sell to any other than the government of the first discoverer, nor to private citizens without the sanction of that government. Hence the Indians were to be considered mere occupants, to be protected indeed while in peace in the possession of their lands, but with an incapacitj' of transferring the absolute title to others. " Fifthly, The United States have acceded to those principles which were the foundation of European title to property in America. The Declaration of In- dependence gave us possession, and the recognition of Independence by Great Britain gave title to all the lands within the boundary lines described in the treaty that closed onr revolutionary war, subject only to the Indian right of occupancy, and we thus be- came possessed of all the right Great Britain had, or which before the separation the provinces possessed, but no more. Hence the exclusive power to extin- guish tliat right, was vested in that government whicli might constitutionally exercise it. Therefore each State before the Union in 1789, and each State since, (within its circumscribed territorial jurisdic- tion) possessed, and possesses, by its government the exclusive right to purchase from the Indians. ""Sixthly, That the allodial property in the territory of this State, or that which has become exclusively vested in the United States, is solely in the govern- ments respectively, and that no foreign grant or title can be recognized by the Courts of Justice of this State, or of the United States. "Spain though deriving a grant from the Pope, was compelled to rest her title on discovery ; Portugal to the Brazils ; France to Canada, Acadia, and Louis- iana ; Holland to the discoveries of Henry Hudson. England, though she wrested the Dutch possessions on the ground of pre-eminent right, asserted it on the same principle, tracing her right to the discover}' of the Cabots, though they merely sailed along the coast of America, and extending her claim from 34° to 48° of north latitude. This principle of ultimate domain, founded on discovery is recognized in the wars, nego- tiations, and treaties of the European nations claiming territory in America. Such were the con- tests of France and Spain as to the territory on the north coast of the Gulf of Mexico ; between France and Great Britain from their nearly contemporaneous settlements, till the treaty of Paris in 1763, when France ceded and guaranteed to Great Britain, Nova Scotia or Acadia, Canada and their dependencies. The cessions and reti-ocessions of the European powers in America were all made while the greater portion of the territories so ceded and retroceded were in the possession of the Indians. This was also the case when the right of ultimate dominion was asserted by actual settlement. The charter to Sir Humphrey Gilbert, renewed in that to Sir Walter Ealeigh ; the charters of James I. successively vacated, surrendered, annulled, or renewed, to the North and South Vir- ginia Companies, until that to the Duke of Lenox and others in 1620 ; were all granted while the coun- try was in the occupation of the Indians. " Under the last mentioned patent, viz. to the Plym- outh Company, New England has, in a great meas- ure, been settled. They conveyed to Henry Rosewell and others in 1627, the territory of Massachusetts, who, in 1628, obtained a charter of incorporation. Having granted a great part of New England, the Company made partition of the residue in 1635, and surrendered their charter to the Crown. A Patent was granted to Ferdinando Gorges for Maine, which was allotted to him in the division of property. New Hampshire was granted to John Mason. Before the surrender by the Dutch of their colony, now New York, in 1664, the King of England had granted to the Duke of York, the country of New England, and as far as the Delaware Bay. The Duke subsequently transferred New Jersey to Lord Berkeley and Sir George Carteret. And yet, during these events, a great proportion of the country was in possession of the Indians. In 1663 the Crown granted to Lord Clarendon and others the country lying between the 36th degree of North latitude and the River St. Mary's ; in 1666 the proprietors obtained a new char- ter granting to them that province in the King's do- minions in North America from the Atlantic to the South Sea. Thus our whole country, the soil as well as the right of dominion, was granted while occupied by the Indians. However extravagant the pretension may appear, of converting the discovery of an inhab- ited country into conquest, if the principle has been asserted in the first instance, and afterwards juain- tained ; if a country has been acquired and held under it ; if the jjroperty of the great mass of the community originates in it, it becomes the law of the land and cannot be questioned The law of conquest, founded in force, but limited by that humanity or policy which incorjiorates the conquered with the victorious, spares all wanton oppression, and protects title to property, whether the vanquished became in- corporated, or were governed as a distinct society, was incapable of application to the aborigines of this country. The tribes of Indians were fierce savages, whose occupation was war, and whose subsistence was chiefly from the forest. To leave them in pos- session of their country, was to leave the country a wilderness ; to govern them as a distinct people was impossible, because they were as brave and high spirited as they were fierce, and were ready to repel by arms every attempt on their independence. To mix with them was impossible. The Europeans were then compelled either to abandon the country, and all THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 37 claim to their discovery, remain exposed to perpetual hazard of massacre, or enforce their claim by the sword. Wars, in which the whites were not always the aggressoi-s, ensued. European policy, numbers, and skill, prevailed. As the white j)opulation ad- vanced, that of the Indians necessarily receded. The country in the neighbourhood of agriculturalists be- came unfit for them. The game fled into thicker and more unbroken forests, and the Indians followed. The soil to which the CVown originally claimed title, being no longer occupied, was parceled out according to the will of the sovereign power, and taken posses- sion of by those claiming under it. Hence the abso- lute title and exclusive right of extinguishing that of the Indians having been vested in, and exercised by, the government cannot exist at the same time in pri- vate individuals, and was incompatible with an abso- lute and complete title in the Indians. The British government, which was then ours, and wliose rights passed to the United States by, and at, the peace of 1783, asserted, and maintained, a title to all the lands occupied by the Indians in the British colonies in America, and the exclusive right of extinguishing their title by occupancy. These claims were carried to the line of the Mississippi by the terms of the treaty of 1783. Our title to a vast portion of the lands we hold originates in them. The United States therefore maintain the principle which has been received as the foundation of all European title in America." By the treaty of peace, in 1783, Great Britain relin- quished all claim not only to the government, but to the soil, and territorial rights, of the thirteen Colonies as claimed by the American negotiators of that treaty, the boundaries of which collectively were fixed by its second article. And by that treaty all the powers of that government and its right to the soil passed to the Thirteen States, not as a single Sovereignty, but as thirteen Independent Sovereignties. But neither the Declaration of Independence, nor the Treaty, could give us more than we possessed by virtue of the for- mer, or to which Great Britain was before entitled. New York, four years before the Articles of Con- federation were adopted and became operative (which did not occur till March, 1781), adopted a constitu- tion, at Kingston, on the 20th day of April, 1777; by the 37th Article of which (since reincorporated in all the subsequent State Constitutions), contracts for lands with the Indians in this State are made void unless sanctioned by the Legislature, and such pur- chases are declared to be a penal offense by a subse- quent act of the Legislature ; the object being the protection of the Indians in the possession of their lands. During her whole existence as a British Colony, a period of one hundred and nineteen years, New York was a Royal Government, a Province indepen- dent in all respects except her allegiance to the British sovereign, whose representative was the Royal Governor for the time being. As such representative the Governor granted by patent all the lands which were granted in the Province, except those previously granted by, the prior Dutch government, the i)Osses- sion of which by their owners was duly confirmed by the Articles of Capitulation under which the Dutch surrender of New Netherland was made in 1664. By the thirty-sixth article of the first State Consti- tution of 1777, all tliese crown grants under, through, and by Provincial Governors, prior to October 14, 1775, were declared to be valid and ineontestible, and were thereby confirmed. And this declaration and confirmation have been continued and adopted in all the succeeding constitutions of New York to the present time. Conscejuently a grant from the British Crown is tlie highest source of title in this State, and one which is irrefragable, and incapable of being affected adversely in any way by any legislative, or other, act of the State government, or any decision of any Court of this Stale, or of the United States. 3. The Dutch in Xeto Netherland. A brief statement of the dealings of the Dutch with their newly discovered country, before its colon- ization was actually begun, is necessary to a right understanding of the principles upon which that colonization was undertaken, and of the system of government, and laws, which that great nation estab- lished, in New Netherland. And here let it be noted, that this name was New Netherland, not New Netherlands, as so often, and so wrongly, printed, written, and spoken. "Niew Ned- erlandt" was the term in Dutch. Adding a final "s" to the English translation, and calling it New Netherlands, is simply a pure New England vulgar- ism, and an utterly erroneous translation of the true name. The Netherlands, in the plural, was the correct name in English of the United Provinces, from the fact that they consisted of seven Provinces, while Niew Netherlandt was but a single Province, not- withstanding its great extent, and hence was always spoken of, and written of, by the Dutcii in the singu- lar number. The announcement of Hudson's great discovery did not produce rapid results. The extraordinary success of the East India Company at that time and the enormous dividends it declared drew the general attention to the eastern, and not to the western world. A single vessel in 1610, the year after the return of the Half Moon, made a successful trading voyage to the "River of the Mountains," returning to Holland with a valuable cargo of peltries. Two Dutch navigators, Hendrick Christiaensen, or Cor- stiaensen, and Adrian Block, chartering a vessel commanded by Captain Ryser, next made a voyage to the new region. In the early part of 1613, Hendrick Corstiaensen, in the "Fortune," and Block, in the 38 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Tiger, sailed again to the Manhattans, and ex- plored the adjacent coasts and waters. Other vessels also visited the hay and river, and all returned with profitable cargoes of furs. No trouble was expe- rienced with the natives, who were ready and willing to exchange their skins for the novel and attractive goods of Europe. Block's vessel, the "Tiger," was accidentally burned in the Bay of New York in the autumn of 1613, and he therefore built another during the succeeding win- ter,^ — the first ever constructed by white men in the waters of New York. It was a small yacht of only sixteen to.as burden (English measure), which, with strange appropriateness, he named " the Onnist " — the Restless. In this yacht, in the summer of 1614, Block sailed through Hellgate and explored Long Island Sound and the adjacent coast as far east as Cape Cod, discovering the Housatonic, and Connecticut rivers Narraganset Bay, and the island that still bears his name. He then first ascertained that Long Island was an island. The Connecticut river he ascended to a little above the present city of Hartford. He was the first European who sailed through the Sound, and the first white man who beheld the southern and eastern shores of Westchester County. Corstiaensen finally determined to remain at Man- hattan to extend the Indian trade. Turning over his own ship to Block, who left him the Onrust, the latter returned to Holland. Corstiaensen built two fortified trading-stations, one on an island below Albany, the other at the south end of ]\Ianhattan Island, and visited and traded with the Indians of all the neighboring tribes. Three other vessels, the Little Fox, the Nightingale and the Fortune, under Captains John de Witt, Rhys Volkertssen and Cornelis Jacobsen May, respectively, visited the "River of the Mountains," exploring and trading with the natives, and those of the regions adjacent. This trade, thus begun, was so profitable that it induced these navigators, and the owners of their ships, to apply to the States-General of the United Provinces for a grant of the sole privilege of trading with the new and pleasant land beyond the ocean. They presented a memorial to this effect, accompanied by the first map ever made of the region of New Netherland — a "Carte Figuratif," as they styled it — to the States-General in the autumn of 1614. The application met their approval, and on the 11th of October, in the same year, that sovereign body made a grant to the petitioners of the privilege sought, to run for the term of three years, from the 1st of Jan- uary, 1615. This grant is in the following words, and in it appears for the first time, as the name of the new region, the term " New Netherland." " The States-General of the United Netherlands to all to whom these presents shall come, Greeting. 1 1. Col. Hist. N. T., 12. I. O'Callaghan's Hist, of New Nether- land, 47. Whereas Gerrit Jacobz Witssen, antient Burgomaster of the City of Amsterdam, Jonas Witssen, Simon Morrissen, owners of the ship named the Little Fox, whereof Jan de Witt has been skipper; Hans Hon- gers, Paulus Pelgrom, Lambrecht van Tweenhuysen, owners of two ships named the Tiger and the For- tune, whereof Adriaen Block and Henrick Corstiaen- sen were skippers; Arnolt van Lybergen, Wessel Schenck, Hans Claessen and Barent Sweettsen, own- ers of the ship named the Nightingale, whereof Thys Volckertsen was skipper; Merchants of the aforesaid City of Amsterdam, and Pieter Clementzen Brouwer, Jan Clementzen Kies, and Cornelis Volck- ertssen. Merchants of the City of Hoorn, owners of the ship named the Fortuyn, wherof Cornelis Jacobssen May was skipper ; all now associated in one company, have respectfully represented to us, that they, the petitioners, after great expenses and damages by loss of ships and other dangers, had, during the present year discovered and found, with the above-named five ships, certain New Lauds situ- ate in America, between New France and Virginia, the seaooasts whereof lie between forty and fortyfive degrees of Latitude, and now called New Netherland : And whereas We did, in the month of March last, for the promotion and increase of commerce, cause to be published a certain General Consent and Charter, setting forth, that whosoever should thereafter dis- cover new havens, lands, places or passages, might frequent, or cause to be frequented, for four voyages, such newly discovered and found, places, passages, havens, or lands, to the exclusion of all others from visiting or frequenting the same from the United Netherlands, until the said first discoverers and find- ers shall, themselves, have completed the said four voyages, or caused the same to be done within the time prescribed for that purpose, under the penalties expressed in the said Octroy, &c., they request that we should accord to them due Act of the aforesaid Octroy in the usual form : " Which being considered, We therefore in Our As- sembly having heard the pertinent Report of the Pe- titioners, relative to the discoveries and findings of the said new Countries between the above-named limits and degrees, and also of their adventures, have consented and granted, and by these presents do con- sent and grant, to the said Petitioners now united into one company, that they shall be privileged exclusively to frequent, or cause to be visited, the above newly dis- covered lands, situate in America between New France and Virginia, whereof the seacoasts lie between the for- tieth and fortyfifth degrees of Latitude, now named New Netherland, as can be^een by a Figurative Map hereun- to annexed, and that for four voyages within the term of three years, commencing the first of January, sixteen hundred and fifteen next ensuing, or sooner, without it being permitted to any other person from the United Netherlands, to sail to, navigate, or frequent the said newly discovered lands, havens, or places, either di- THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 39 rectly or indirectly, within the said three years, on pain of confiscation of the vessel and Cargo where- with infraction hereof shall be attempted, and a fine of Fifty thousand Netherland Ducats for the benefit of the said discoverers or finders ; provided, neverthe- less, that by these presents We do not intend to prejudice or diminish any of our former grants or charters; And it is Our intention, that if any disputes or differences arise from these our concessions they shall be decided by ourselves. " We therefore expressly command all Governors, Justices, Officers, Magistrates, and inhabitants, of the aforesaid United Countries, that they allow the said company peaceably and quietly to enjoy the whole benefit of this Our grant and consent, ceasing all con- tradictions and obstacles to the contrary. For such we have found to appertain to the public service. Given under our seal, paraph and signature of Our Secretary, at the Hague the xith of October, 1614."' This exclusive charter expired by its terms on the first of January, 1818, and the company of merchants to whom it had been granted, — " the United New Netherland Company '' — as they styled themselves, applied for its renewal. This the States-General re- fused, having in contemplation to charter a great military and commercial company for the West Indies similar to the great organization of that nature then existing for the East Indies. The object in view in both was the same, namely, to establish a power, which could, at the same time, maintain profitable foreign trade, and carry on military and naval enter- prises against Spain, thus in both ways crippling their hereditary enemy. In the summer of 1618, Hendrick Eelkens and his partners, by special per- mission of the States-General, sent their ship, the " Scheldt " to the Manhattans for a single trading voyage. In 1619 Captain Cornelis Jacobsen May, who had made the voyage, a few years before in com- mand of the "Fortune," sailed again in the ship " Glad Tidings." and explored the Bays of the Del- aware, and the Chesapeake. Returning in 1620, he and his owners applied to the States-General for a special charter in their favor, and Eelkens and his partners put in an opposing petition claiming such special charter for themselves on the ground of prior discovery. The States-General tried to compel these parties to settle their differences, and unite their interests, and appointed a committee upon the sub- ject. This committee sat for several months endeav- oring, after hearing both sides, to effect this object ; but finding it impossible, they so reported, and the States General refused to give either party the wished for prize. In less than seven months after this rejection, " the long pending question of a grand armed commercial organization was finally settled; and an ample charter, (bearing date the third day of June 1621) gave the AVest India Company almost unlimited powers to colonize, govern, and defend New Netherland." In the year 1619 Captain Thomas Dermer, a naviga- tor in the employment of Sir Ferdinando Gorges, one of the leading corporators of the " Council of Plym- outh " (as the Company chartered by James I. in 1606, was styled) who terms him " a brave stout gen- tleman," was sent in command of a ship of two hundred tons on a voyage to Monhegan, an island on the Coast of Maine some distance east of the Mouth of the Kennebec. One object of this voyage was to obtain a cargo of fish, another was to return to his home Squanto, one of the twenty-seven Massachu- setts Indians kidnapped, carried to Malaga in Spain, and sold as slaves, late in 1614, by Hunt, the master of one of the three vessels of Captain John Smith, which that famous explorer left behind him to com- plete her cargo on his departure from New England in July, 1614.' By the good efforts of some benevolent monks of Malaga many of the kidnapped Indians were rescued from slavery, and eventually found their way back to America. One of these was Squanto, who on reaching London, was sent by Mr. Slaney, merchant and treasurer of the Newfoundland Company to that island. There Dermer met him, on touching at the island on his way to England on a previous voyage, and carried him back to that country, as the easiest way of returning him to New England. On this, his next voyage he carried Squanto along with him. On arriving at IVIonhegan, and leaving his vessel there to obtain her cargo of fish, he took the ship's pin- nace, an open, undecked boat, of only five tons, and with Squanto and two or three sailors departed for the home of his Indian friend. The unhappy sav- ages so wickedly kidnapped by Hunt were natives of Patuxet on the coast of Massachusetts Bay and its neighborhood, Squanto himself having been born at that place. Dermer left Monhegan on the 19th day of May, 1619, and in his letter to the Rev. Samuel Purchas, (which the latter published in the fourth volume of his " Pilgrimage," in 162.5,) says, " I passed along the coast where I found some ancient plantations, not long since populous, now utterly void; in other places a remnant remains, but not free from sickness. Their disease is the plague, for we might perceive the sores of some that had escaped who described the spots of such as usually die, (evi- dently the small-pox). When I arrived at my savage's native country, finding all dead, I travelled a long days journey westward to a place called Nummastaguyt (a place fifteen miles west from Pa- tuxet) where finding inhabitants, I despatched a messenger a days journey farther west to Pocanaoket which bordereth on the sea, (now Bristol, Rhode Island); whence came to see me two kings, attended II. Col. Hist. Y. u. » I. Brod. 97. 1 3 K. T. Hist. Soc. Coll., 2d .*HTie9. Vol. I. .W. I. Brodhead, 97. 40 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. with a guard of fifty men, who being well satisfied with what my savage and I discoursed unto them — be- ing desirous of novelty— gave me content in whatever I demanded, where I found that former relations were true. " Here I redeemed a Frenchman, and afterwards, another at Mastachusit, who three years since escaped shipwreck at the north-east of Cape Cod." Patuxet was the very place where on the 21st of December, 1620, eighteen months later, the Pilgrims from Leyden landed from the Mayflower, and which Captain John Smith six years before had called " Plymouth," a name which will ever be famous in New England history. Strange are the historic facts, that slaves were its first export, and those slaves Indians, that its first foreign visitors, after its dis- covery by Smith, were Frenchmen, the two redeemed by Dermer, who was the first to point out its advantages for a town, and that the coming there of the Pilgrims afterward was the merest accident of an accident, they having sailed for New Netherland. Dermer reached Monhegan on his return, on the 23d of June, 1619, and after despatching his ship back to England, prepared to sail on a voyage to Virginia in his pinnace. " I put," he says, " most of my provisions aboard the Sampson of Captain Ward, ready bound for Virginia from whence he came, taking no more into the pinnace than I thought might serve our turns, determining with God's help to search the coast along, and at Virginia to supply ourselves for a second discovery if the first failed." He then sailed along the coast to Virginia arriving there on the 8th of September, 1619. Squanto terribly disappointed at finding all his 2:)eople dead, remained with Dermer, till he touched on this second pinnace voyage, at Sawah-quatooke (an Indian town in the present township of Brewster on Cape Cod) " where," in Dermer's words, " he desired to stay with some of our savage friends." Subsequently Squanto, from the knowledge of English he had picked up> became of great assistance to the Pilgrims as an in- terpreter and his later career is well known. Dermer stopped at Martha's Vineyard, and thence as he says, shaped his voyage " as the coast led me till I came to the most westerly part where the coast began to fall away southerly. (This was the eastern entrance of Long Island Sound.) In my way I dis- covered land about thirty leagues in length hereto- fore taken for main, where I feared I had been em- bayed, but by the help of an Indian I got to sea again, through many crooked and straight passages. I let pass many accidents in this journey occasioned by treachery, where we were twice compelled to go together by the ears ; once the savages had great advantage of us in a strait, not above a bow-shot, [wide], and where a great multitude of Indians let fly at us from the bank ; but it pleased God to make us victors. Near unto this we found a most danger- ous cataract amongst small, rocky islands, occasioned by two unequal tides, the one ebbing and flowing two hours before the other." This was Hellgate, and the place were the Indians " let fly" at them was in the neighborhood of Throg's Point. Such was the voy- age of the first Englishman who ever sailed through Long Island Sound, and the first who ever beheld the southern and eastern shores of Westchester County. This was five years after the Dutch skipper Block had sailed through the same Sound from the Man- hattans, and ten years after Hudson's discovery of " the Great River of the Mountains." Very singular it is, that fights with the Indians, both, on the Hud- son, and on the Sound, and at points nearly opposite each other, were the beginning of civilization in Westchester County ; and that the first was with the Dutch and the second with the English, the two races of whites, which, in succession, ruled that county, and the Province and State of New York.' Dermer spent the succeeding winter (1619-20) in Virginia, went back to New England the next sum- mer, again visited Plymouth in June, and described its advantages for a town settlement in his letter of the 30th of that month, went again to Virginia, and there died. On this return voyage from Virginia, Dermer, in the words of the " Brief Relation " of the Plymouth Company's proceedings from 1607 to 1622, "met with certain Hollanders, who had a trade in Hudson's river some years before that time, with whom he had a conference about the state of that coast, and their proceedings with those people, whose answer gave him good content." This visit of Dermer to " certain Hollanders " was the first visit of an Englishman to Manhattan Island, and he was the first man of that race who trod its soil. Hudson never landed on the island, and they who first did so, and those whom Dermer found there, were Dutchmen. This voyage, however, was the basis of one of the most famous myths of American and New York history. Twenty-nine years after Dermer's visit, in the year 1648, there appeared in England a ])amplilet, under the nom de plume of " Beauchamp Plantagenet, Esq.," entitled, " A Description of the Province of New Albion," in which it is stated, that Capt. Samuel Argall, on his return to Virginia from Acadia in 1613, "landed at Manhatas Isle, in Hud- son's river, where they found four houses built, and a pretended Dutch Governor under the West India Company of Amsterdam," and that he (Argall) forced the Dutch to submit themselves to the King of Eng- land and to the government of Virginia.^ This story, often and often repeated, is not sup- ported by any official document of the English, Virginia, or Dutch governments yet discovered to this day, and is believed by modern scholars to have been ^ This letter of Dermer reprinted from Purchas with a learned preface, is in I. N. Y. Hist. Soc. CoU. 2d Series, 343. Also in 2GMass. Hist. Coll., p. 63. 2 I. N. Y. Hist. Soc. Coll., 2d Series, 335. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 41 based by " Plantageiiet " on Deimer's account of his voyages, somewhat dressed up. In 1613 the Dutch West India Coni[»any had not only not been incorpo- rated, but it was not I'ornied till 1621. That eminent American historical scholar, the late Hon. Henry C. Murphy of Brooklyn, a great lawyer, a practiced statesman, in the Dutch language profoundly skilled, and who had been minister to Holland, after a thorough investigation of this story of Argyll's visit, placed in a note to his translation of Van dor Donck's "Vertoogh," or "Representation," of New Nether- land, published in 1849, the following emphatic opinion, — " This story is a pure fiction, unsustained by any good authority — though some writers have heaped up citations on the subject — and as fully sus- ceptible of disproof as any statement of that character at that early period can be." ' It is clear that from Hudson's Discovery to the chartering of the West India Company the Dutch considered New Netherland as a colony for commer- cial purposes only, and maintained it simply for the profits of the fur trade with the Indians. Its true colonization, as a land to be settled by their own people, for its agricultural and other resources, and as a possible market for the productions of Holland, was gradually forced upon them by their experience of its constantly increasing value, and pleasant, and pro- ductive, climate and soil. The first step in this direction was the chartering of the West India Company by the States General of the United Netherlands on the third of June 1621. Such an organization as an armed military trading com- pany to Africa and Virginia, was suggested by William Usselinx, a merchant of Antwerp, in 16uG, as a means of aiding the Government in the war with Spain, then raging. Some preliminary measures were taken, but before any practicable ones could be adopted, the truce of 1609 was agreed upon for the term of twelve years, and the scheme fell to the ground. The charter of 1621 was not put into immediate operation, but was held for further consideration and discussion, during the next two years. Finally the interests of all parties were harmonized, certain amplifications and amendments were fully agreed upon, and were embodied in an "ordinance" of the States-General, which pas-^ed the seals on the 21st of June 1623, containing twelve "Articles," and which closes in these words: — " We having examined and considered the aforesaid articles, and being desirous to promote unity and con- cord between the directors and principal adventurers, and the advancement of the West India Company, have with the advice of the Prince of Orange,-' thought fit to agree to, and approve of, and do hereby agree 1 II. N. Y. Hist. Soc. Coll., 2d Series, 326 ; see also I. Brodhead, 51, and note E., p. I'A. - Prince Maurice. 4 to, and approve thereof, and direct that the same shall be punctually attended to and observed, by the direc- tors, members, and every person concerned therein, in the same manner as if they wore inserted in the charter; because we find them proper for the service of the West India Company." ' While these modifications were being considered the States-General authorized many special voyages to New Netherland, each under a special license, which also contained a proviso obliging the j)arties in interest to return with their ships by the first of July 1622. This was to avoid any interference with the West India Company, or any anticipation of the commencement of their business.* The Charter of the Dutch West India Company was modeled after that of the Great Dutch East India Company, and like it was intended to promote trade, colonization, and the breaking down by armed fleets of the power and pride of the kingdom of Spain. Both were armed commercial monopolies with most extensive powers and enormous capital. Both were established on the basis of the public law of Holland, which was simply the " Roman Law," with slight modifications. And both were supported by the assistance and strength of the Government of the United Provinces. The West India Company's Charter consists of a preamble and forty-five articles, together with the preamble and twelve articles of the final agreement of the 21st of June 1623 above-mentioned. The central power of this vast association, as O'Callaghan states, " was divided, for the more efficient exercise of its functions, among five branches or chambers, established in the dilferent cities of the Netherlands, the managers of which were styled ' Lords Direct- ors.' Of these, that of Amsterdam was the principal, and to this was intrusted the management of the affairs of New Netherland. The general supervision and government of the Company, were, however, lodged in a board, or Assembly of Nineteen delegates [briefly termed the Assembly of XIX.] ; eight (changed to nine in 1629) of whom were from the Chamber at Amsterdam ; four from Zealand ; two from Maeze ; and one from each of the chambers of Friesland and Groeningen (forming the North Department). The nineteenth was ajjpointed [as their own representa- tive] by their High Mightinesses, the States General of the United Provinces." Apart from the exclusive trade of the coast of Africa, from the tropic of Cancer to the Cape of Good Hope, and of the coast of America, from the Straits of Magellan to the extreme North [Terra Nova or Newfoundland], this Company was authorized to Ibrm alliances with the chiefs of the Indian tribes, and obligated to advance the settlement of their posses- sions, encourage population, and do everything that s I. O'Call., Appendix " B," 408. * I. Col. Uist. N. Y., 22-27. 42 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. might promote the interests of those fertile countries and increase trade. To protect its commerce and dependencies, the Company was empowered to erect forts and fortifica- tions; to administer justice and preserve order; main- tain police, and exercise the government generally of its transmarine affairs ; declare war and make peace, with the consent of the States-General ; and, with their approbation, appoint a Governor or Director- General, and all other officers, civil, military, judicial, and executive, who were bound to swear allegiance to their High Mightinesses, as well as to the Company itself. The Director-General and his Council were invested with all powers judicial, legislative, and executive, subject, some supposed, to appeal to Holland; but the will of the Company, expressed in their instructions, or declared in their marine or military ordinances, was to be the law of New Netherland, excepting in cases not especially provided for, when the Roman Law, the imperial statutes of Charles V., the edicts, resolutions, and customs of Patria — Fatherland — were to be received as the paramount rule of action.' " The States General engaged, among other things, to secure to the Company freedom of navigation and traffic, within the prescribed limits, and to assist them with a million of guilders, equal to nearly half a million of dollars; and in case peace should be dis- turbed, with sixteen vessels of war and four yachts, fully armed and equipped; the i'ornier to be at least of three hundred, and the latter of eighty, tons bur- then ; but these vessels were to be maintained at the expense of the Company, which was to furnish, un- conditionally, sixteen ships and fourteen yachts, of like tonnage, for the defence of trade and purposes of war, which, with all merchant vessels, were to be commanded by an admiral appointed and instructed by their High Mightinesses." ^ Such were the great and extensive powers under which New York was colonized. And such was the basis of the legal system under which civil rule and civil law was first established within its borders; and under which it flourished and was governed, till the close of the Dutch dominion, a period of more than half a century. 4. The Colonhntion by the West India Company. In the same year, 1623, the West India Company began the colonization of New Netherland, which was then erected into a Province, by the States- General and invested with the armorial bearings of a Count ;^ the shield being, argent, a pale sable charged with three crosses saltire, argent, paleways; the crest a Beaver coucliant proper.* 1 I. O'Call. Hist., 89. 2 lb , 91. s I. Brod., 148 ; I. O'Call., 99. * These arms, in IGjl, ajipeur on the first seal of tlio Province, which To the Chamber of Amsterdam was committed its direction and management. That body despatched the first expedition in March, 1623, under Cornelis Jacobsen May — from whom the northern cape at the mouth of the Delaware is named — as the first Direc- tor-General of New Netherland. It consisted of the ship "New Netherland" of 266 tons burthen, with a cargo of supplies and tools, and thirty families of colonists, who were Protestant Walloons. These Wal- loons were the inhabitants of the frontier between France, and Flanders, from the river Scheldt to the river Lys, their language was the old French, and their religion the Reformed Faith of the Huguenots. Associated with this expedition, as the captain of the ship, was Adrian Joris, who had made several prior voyages to the coast of America, although he is some- times erroneously styled "Director."" After a two months' voyage by way of the Canaries and the West Indies May and his colonists arrived in the baj' of New York. He divided the Walloons into several parties, sending some to Albanj', some to the Del- aware, some to Hartford, some to Staten Island, some to Long Island — where the name of the Wallabout bay still denotes the place of their settlement — and retained others on the island of Manhattan. Thus began the real colonization of New Netherland, a region out of whicii was to be formed four of the Middle States and one of the New England States of the American Union. The first colonists of this region spoke no English, and knew no English law, and they were brought here by the nation which first discovered and occupied the land,' a nation likewise ignorant of English law and of the English tongue. The Roman law, with a few Batavian customs engrafted upon it, was the first legal system established in the entire region, and it not only governed the foundation of European rule and civilization in New Netherland, but maintained their continuous existence there, for half a century ; and even then only yielded to another tongue and another legal system by the force of arms. May administered the aflfiiirs of the new colony about a year, and was succeeded by William Verhulst as second Director-General, whose administration likewise continued only a year, when he resigned and returned to Holland. It was marked however by the arrival and introduction of the first wheeled vehicles and first domestic animals into this State. Peter Evertsen Hulst, a merchant, and a director of the Amsterdam Chamber, despatched to "The Man- hadoes " three ships of 280 tons each, at his own expense and risk, in April 1625, with supplies, tools. in those days was also the seal of "New Amsterdam," Burmounted by a mantle having in its centre the letters G. W. C, the initials of " Geoctroyeedo AVest Indische Comp\gnie," the Dutch appellation of the West India Company. —III. Doc. Hist, 396. 6 Wassenaer, III. Doc. Hist., 4.3. 6 I. Brod., 156. " Cabot, whose voyage along the coast of North America was the basis of the English claim to New Netherland, never landed upon nor took possession of any part of it for the King of England. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 43 aiul wagons, and one hundred and tliree head of uaimals, consisting of" stallions, mares, bulls, cows, swine and sheep ; " each beast," says Wassenaer, in his account of the voyage, " had its own separate stall," arranged on a flooring of sand three feet deep, which was laid upon a deck specially constructed in the vessel, beneath which were stowed 300 tuns (casks) of water. Only two beasts died at sea. The rest on arriving were landed on "Noten," now Governor's, Island, then covered by a dense forest of nut trees, so thick that the pasturage was insufficient, and two days later all the animals were transferred to Man- hattan Island where they throve well. These ships also brought six more families of Walloons, and a few single people, forty-five persons in all.' To Verhiilst succeeded, as third Director-General, Peter Minuit, of Wesel, in Westphalia, who was of French Huguenot origin. He sailed from the Texel on the ninth of January, 1626, in the ship Sea-Mew, and reached " the Mauhadoes " on the fourth of the succeeding May. The .second and third articles of the Charter of the West India Company conferred upon it the power of appointing the Directors-General, and other officers, of all colonies it might establish. The Amsterdam Ciiamber, to which had been committed the care of New Netherland, under these powers proceeded to organize the first civil government in the new Prov- ince. The grant in the West India Company's charter is very extensive. The operative words are, " and also build any forts and fortifications there, to appoint and discharge governors, people for war, and officers of justice, and other public officers, for the preservation of the ])laces, keeping good order, police, and justice, and in like manner for the promoting of trade; and again others in their place to put, as they, from the situation of their affairs shall see fit." By virtue of these powers, and of the vote of the Company placing New Netherland under its sole control and management, the Amsterdam Chamber of the Company appointed Peter Minuit Director- (teneral, and the following persons as his council, viz., Peter Bylvelt, Jacob Elbertsen Wissinck, Jan Jansen Brouwer, Symon Dirksen Pos and Reynert Harmensen. To these were added Isaac de Rasieres as Provincial Secretary, and Jan Lami)o as "Schout- Fiscaal," {pronounced as if spelled ^' Skowt"), who was an executive officer, combining the powers of a sheriff and an attorney-general. These formed the first organized civil government in what is now this State of New York — and collectively were styled " The Director-General and Council of New Netherland." The Schout-Fiscaal was entitled to sit with the Coun- cil but had no vote. The Secretary was the officer next in importance to the Director, and was also '■ Opper-koopman," or book-keeper and treasurer. • This Council had supreme executive and legislative I III. Doc. Hist. N. Y., 41^3. authority in the colony. It was also the sole tribunal for the trial of all civil and criminal cases, and all prosecutions before it were instituted and conducted by the Schout-Fiscaal. In taking informations, he was bound to note as well those points which made for the prisoner as well as those against him, as the Roman law provides, and after trial to see that the sentence was lawfully executed. He was also chief custom-house officer and had power to inspect vessels and their cargoes, sign their papers, and confiscate all goods introduced in violation of the Company's regu- lations. This most responsible of all the offices in the new government was held during Director Minuit's entire administration by the above-named Jan Lampo who was a native of Cantelberg. It should be stated also, that when the Schout-Fiscaal acted as prosecut- ing officer he retired from the bench. It will be seen that this Council acted in a twof'old capacity, as an Executive Council, and as a Court of Justice. When, later, inferior tribunals were established, its members were not amenable to them. On extraordinary occasions it was usual to adjoin some of the principal inhabitants, or Public Servants, pro hac vice, to the Council by its own vote, who then had an equal voice in the decision of the matter in question.'' Such was the nature of the body by which execu- tive, legislative, and judicial authority was exercised, not only on Manhattan Island, and in the Caunty of Westchester, but in all parts of New Netherland. The new government began vigorously. The Governor and Council first laid out and commenced the erection of a regular fortification on the extreme southern point of Manhattan Island. The engineer was Krijn Frederickje, and it was begun in 1626, was not finished in July 1627, as de Rasieres tells us, but was probably completed at the end of 1627. Its pred- ecessor, though called a fort, was simply a stock- aded trading house. This, however, was a regular work of four bastions, entirely fiiced with stone.' Isaac de Rasieres, the writer of the letter mentioned, arrived in the ship " Arms of Amsterdam " on July 27th, 1623. He was a HugU3not WaKoan,an agent of Blommaert an Am->terdam merchant, and a mem- ber of the West India Company, to whom his letter is addressed. He was made by Minuit Provincial Secretary, and as such, opened a correspondence with Gov. Bradford of Plymouth, for a friendly trade, visited that celebrated place, as a New Netherland envoy in 1627, and has left us an account of it in this letter, discovered at the Hague in 1846, and first printed in II. N. Y. Hist. Soc. Coll., 2 Series, 339. On the 23d of September, 1626. this shij), the " Arms of Amsterdam," sailed again on her return voyage to Holland, with a very vakiable cargo of furs. s I. O'Call., 101 ; X. Xetliorlnuil Register, 2. 3 Wiisseiiner, III. Poc. Hist. N. Y., 47 ; Hrcxlhead's Early Colonization of N. Xetherlui.d, II. K. Y. Hist. Coll., 2d Scries, [i]). 3C3-3G5. 44 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. She also carried out the official account of the most important event that had yet happened in New Netherland, the result of a treaty held by Director Minuit and his Council with the natives of Man- hattan, the first ever held by the Dutch with the Indians in America. This event was the purchase of the Island of Manhattan by the West India Com- pany, which is the foundation of title to all the real estate on the Island of New York, and by which the city holds all the land that it still possesses at this day, south of the Harlem River. She had a compara- tively rapid passage, reaching Amsterdam on the fourth of November following, a little over six weeks. The very next day, the delegate of the States- General in the "Assembly of the XIX.," then in session, advised that august body of the arrival, and the news, by letter. Unfortunately Minuit's official despatch has not been preserved, but tlje letter of Pieter Schagen, the States-General's representative, is still in the Royal Archives at the Hague, and proves the fact. It is, in full, as follows; — "High and Mighty Lords : — Yesterday arrived here the ship ' the Arms of Amsterdam,' which sailed from New Netherland out of the River Mauritius,^ on the 23d of September. They report that our people are in good heart and live in peace there ; the Women have also borne some children there. They have purchased the Island Manhattes from the Indians for the value of 60 guilders; 'tis 11,000 morgens in size.- They had all their grain sown by the middle of May, and reaped by the middle of August. They send thence samples of summer grain ; such as wheat, rye, barley, oats, buckwheat, canary seed, beans, aud flax. The cargo of said ship is ; — 7,246 Beaver skins. 178J Otter skins. 675 Otter skins. 48 Minck skins. 36 Wild cat skins. 33 Minckes. 34 Rat skins. Considerable oak timber and hickory. Herewith, High and Mighty Lords, be recom- mended to the mercy of the Almighty. In Amsterdam, the 5th of November A. D. 1626. Your High Mightinesses obedient, P. Schagen." It is endorsed, " Received 7th November, 1626." This action of Director-General Minuit and the Council of New Netherland marku the beginning of the policy of the Dutch nation in its treatment of the Indians of America in the matter of their lands, and also its Christian character. This policy and all the dealings with the natives pursuant to it was based on 1 The Dutch so named the Hudson after Maurice, the then Prince of Orange. - A morgen, or Dutch acre, was two English acres ; " CO guilaers " was 24 dullais of our money. the principle, that the Indians were the lawful pro- prietors of their native land by original right of occu- pancy, and that it could only be alienated by their own act, and not taken from them by right of coti- quest, or by rapine. Of no other of the nations of Europe which colonized America, except the Dutch, can it be truly said that this wise and Chiistian principle always governed them in their dealings with the Indians. Much has been written about AVilliam Penn as being the first to purchase their lands by treating with them. But Director Minuit on the banks of the Hudson preceded him in this honor- able and Christian treatment of the Indians by more than half a century. And the same policy and treat- ment was ever continued during the whole period of the Dutch possession of the Province of New Nether- land. At the date of the purchase the Indian population of Manhattan Island is said by some writers to have been 200, men, women, and children, and by none has it been put at more than 300. The numbers of the Dutch, we know, were only 270.' So that the population on each side could not have been far from equal. A fact that speaks well for those early Dutch people, for from the discovery up to 1626 their pos- session of the island was only by the suflerance of the Indians, and during that whole time there was never a contest or a quarrel between them and the savages. The price paid for the Island was a fair one, for the time, age, and place, for it was nothing but a little wild island on a coast almost unknown, of a continent entirely unknown. It was but one of hundreds and hundreds of small islands lying all along the Western shores of the Atlantic Ocean, with nothing to show it had any value at all except the prior occupation of one end of it as a trading post by the Dutch. And many of those same little islands in as out-of- the-way places, may be purchased to-day for a price almost as low. De Laet in his history of the West India Com- pany gives a table of the annual exports and imports from, and into. New Netherland, from 1624 to 1635, from which it appears, that in 1626, the year of the purchase, but two ships came to, and went from. New Amsterdam, and that the value of the imports (sup- plies and goods) was 20,384 guilders, about 8,500 dol- lars, and that of the exports (furs and timber) were 45,050 guilders, about 14,000 dollars.* It was simply as a station to collect furs from the Indians that Manhattan Island then had any value whatever. Such was the beginning of that "Prov- ince of New Netherland" in the year 1623, which 262 years later, in 1885, is the State and City of New York, the former with 5,000,000 of inhabitants, the latter with 1,250,000 people. And the island that was 3 Wassenaer, III. Doc. Hist. N. T., 47. ^De Lact, ]. X. Y. Uist. Coll., -Jd ouviis, 385. I. O'Call., 104. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 45 tlicn bought for 24 dollars, now has a value so high up in the millions of dollars, that the mind with difficulty can take it in ; while the city built upon it, is the third in importance, size, and wealth in the civilized world, and the chiefest in the western hemisphere. The Walloons had moved in the matter of leaving Holland for America in the year 1621, two years be- fore the thirty families came out under Director May as mentioned above. They applied to Sir Dudley Carleton, British Ambassador at the Hague, to know, whether the King of England, James the First, would permit them "to settle in Virginia," in accordance with a petition setting forth the terms and conditions under which they desired to undertake the enterprise. This Petition of fifty-six heads of families, Walloon, and French, all of the Reformed Religion was pre- sented to, and left, with Carleton, who sent it to Eng- 1 md, enclosed in a letter of his own favoring its object, dated the 19tli of July. 1621. Accompanying the petition was a written covenant in these words ; — "We promise his Lordship the ambassador of the most serene king of Great Britain, that we will go to settle in Virginia, a part of his Majesty's dominions, at the earliest time practicable, and this under the conditions set forth in the articles we have communi- cated to his said lordship the ambassador, and not otherwise." This paper bore the signatures of all the petitioners, attached in the form of a round-robin the centre of which was the above covenant; and it showed, be- sides the names of the signers, their occupations, and the number of the children of each. Among the names are those well known in New Amsterdam from that day to this, as De Forest, De La Montagne, Lam- bert, Le Roy, Du Puy, and others, as good, honest, upright people. The Lords in Council referred the application to the Virginia Company, who received it very coldly, suggested a few modifications and de- clined any assistance, in money or in transportation. This ended the matter with the English, and these "Walloons as well as French," afterwards made ar- rangements with the West India Company to go to New Netherland, which were carried out under May in 1623 as mentioned before. This petition to the British King contained seven articles specifying in detail, the conditions and terms under which, these first colonists desired to enter upon the work of colonization, and is therefore of the great- est value as acquainting us, beyond cavil, with the views and ideas of those who actually did begin that work in what is now the City and State of New York.' In this document appears the very earliest mention of the land tenure which the first colonists of New York desired and asked for. It was that with which they were familiar, and which they fully understood, iThi3 petition is given at length, with an engravingof the " round nibin" ami its signatures, in tlie valuable "History of the HuRuennt Euiigratiun," by the Rev. Dr. C. W. Baird, vol. I. p. 158, just published. and under which they had always lived, and was based on fealty, homage, and manorial rights, as fixed by the Roman law, with which alone they were ac- quainted, and which under the West India Company was established as the law of New Netherland, and governed it till its conquest by the English in 1664. The articles of this " petition" numbers five and six, are in these words (The whole is in French, and this is the translation) : "VI. Whether he (His Britannic Majesty) would "grant them a township or territory, in a radius of " eight English miles, or say, sixteen miles in diameter, "which they might improve as fields, meadows, vine- " yards, and for other uses; which territory whether "conjointly or severally, they would hold from his "Majesty upon fealty and homage; no others being "allowed to dwell within the bounds of the said "lands, unless they shall have taken letters of citi- "zeuship; in which territory they would reserve to "themselves inferior manorial rights; and whether it " might be permitted to those of their number who "are entitled to maintain the rank of noblemen, to " declare themselves such. " VII. Whether they would be permitted in the "said lands to hunt all game whether furred or " feathered, to fish in the sea and the rivers, to cut "heavy timber, as well for ship building as for com- " merce, at their own will ; in a word, whether they "could make use of all things either above or beneath "the ground, at their own pleasure and will, the royal "rights reserved; and whether they could dispose of " all things in trade with such persons as may be per- "raitted them. "Which provisions would extend only to said "families and those belonging to them, without ad- " mitting those who might come afterwards to the said "territory to avail themselves of the same, except so " far as they might of their own power, grant this to " them, and not beyond, unless his said Majesty should "make a new grant to them." Such were the clear, undeniable wishes and desires, expressed in their own words, by those men who began the actual settlement of the region now known as New York, and which they did carry out, a little modified, by the Dutch system and rule. The West India Company by its charter was bound to take measures for the increase of the population of its new Province, and the development of its agri- cultural resources. It found this a difficult duty to perform, mainly in consequence of two causes. The first was, the extreme profit of the fur trade which absorbed the general attention. The second was, that the farmers and laborers of Holland knew that they could do well enough at home. This fact is thus state Under the Roman Dutch law. longing to the company, provided they take the oath - and pay to the Company ibr bringing over the jjcople as mentioned in the first article; and for freight of the goods five per cent, ready money, to be reckoned on the prime cost of the goods here; in which is, however, not to be included such creatures and other implements, as are necessary for the cultivation and improvement of the lands, which the Comi)any are to carry over without any reward if there is room in their ships. But the Patroons shall at their own expense, provide and make places' for them, together with every thing necessary for the support of the crea- tures. "XI. In case it should not suit the Company to send any ships, or in those going there should be no room ; then the said Patroons, after having communi- cated their intentions, and after having obtained con- sent from the Comi)any in writing, may send their own ships or vessels thither; jirovided that in going or coming they go not out of their ordinary course ; giv- ing security to the Company for the same, and taking on board an assistant, to be victualled by the Patroons, and paid his monthly wages by the Company ; on pain, for doing the contrary, of forfeiting all the right and property they have obtained to the colonic. "XII. Inasmuch as it is intended to people the island of the Manhattes first, all fruits and wares that are produced on the lands situate on the North River, and lying thereabout, shall, for the present, be brought there before they may be sent elsewhere; excepting such as are from their nature unnecessary there, or such as cannot, without great loss to the owner there- of, be brought there ; in which case the owners shall be obliged to give timely notice in writing of the dif- ficulty attending the same, to the Company here, or the Commander and Council there, that the same may be remedied as the necessities thereof shall be found to require. " XIII. All the Patroons of colonies in New Nether- land, and of colonies on the Island of Manhattes, shall be at liberty to sail and traffic all along the coast from Florida to Terra Neuf,* provided that they do again return, with all such goods as they shall get in trade, to the Island of Manhattes, and pay five per cent, for recognition to the Company, in order, if pos- sible, that after the necessary inventory of the goods shipped be taken, the same may be sent hither. And if should so happen, that they could not return, by contrary streams or otherwise, they shall, in such case, not be permitted to bring such goods to any other place but to these dominions, in order that under the inspection of the directors of the place where they may arrive, they may be unladen, an in- ventory thereof made, and the aforesaid recognition 2 0f aUeginncc to the Company, and to the States General. 8 Stalls, or other accuinmudutions. , 'Neu'fuuudluud. 48 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of five per cent, paid to the company here, on pain, if they do the contrary, of the forfeiture of the goods so trafficked for, or the real vahie thereof. " XIV. In case the ships of the Patroons, in going to, or coming from, or sailing on, the coast from Florida to Terra Neuf, and no further without our grant, should overpower any of the prizes of the enemy, they shall be obliged to bring, or cause to be brought such prize to the college (chamber) of the place, from whence they sailed out, in order to be rewarded by them ; the company shall keep the one-third part thereof, and the remaining two-thirds shall belong to them in consideration of the cost and risk they have been at, all according to the orders of the company. " XV. It shall also be free for the aforesaid Pa- troon^t to traffic and trade all along the coast of New Netherland and places circumjacent, with such goods as are consumed tliere, and receive in return for them, all sorts of merchandise that may be had there, except beavers, otters, minks, and all sorts of peltry, Aviiich trade the company reserve to themselves. But the same shall be permitted at such places where the company have no factories,' conditioned that such traders shall be obliged to bring all the peltry they can procure to the island of Manhattes, in case it may be, at any rate, practicable, and there deliver to the director, to be by him shipped hither with the ships and goods ; or, if they should come hither, without going there, then to give notice thereof to the Com- pany, that a proper account thereof may be taken, in order that ihey may pay to the Company one guilder fur each merchantable beaver and otter skin ; the property, risk and all other charges, remaining on account of the Patroons or owners. "XVI. All coarse wares that the colonists of the Patroons there shall consume, such as pitch, tar, wood-ashes, wood, grain, fish, salt, hearthstone, and such like things, shall be brought over in the com- pany's ships, at the rate of eighteen guilders ($7.20) per last; four thousand weight to be accounted a last, and the company's ship's crew shall be obliged to wheel and bring the salt on board, whereof ten lasts make a hundred. And in case of the want of ships, or room in the ships, they may order it over at their own cost, in ships of their own, and enjoy in these dominions such liberties and benefits as the company have granted; but in either case they shall be obliged to pay over and above the recognition five per cent.) eighteen guilders per each hundred of salt that is car- ried over in the company's ships. " XVII. For all wares which are not mentioned in the foregoing article, and which are not carried by the last, there shall be paid one dollar per each hundred pounds weight ; and for wines, brandies, verjuice, and vinegar, there shall be paid eighteen guilders per cask. " XVIII. The Company promises the colonists of the Patroons, that they shall be free from customs, taxes, excise, imposts or any other contributions, for the S2)ace of ten years; and after the expiration of the said ten years at the highest, such customs as the goods are taxable with here for the present. "XIX. They will not take from the service of the Patroons any of their colonists, either man or woman, son or daughter, man-servant or maid-servant ; and though any of them should desire the same, they will not receive them, nor permit them to leave their Pa- troons, and enter into the service of another, unless on consent obtained from their Patroons in writing; and this for and during so many years as they are bound to their Patroons; after the expiration whereof, it shall be in the power of the Patroons to send hither all such colonists as will not continue in their ser- vice, and until then shall not enjoy their liberty. And all such colonists as shall leave the service of their Patroons, and enter into the service of another, or shall, contrary to his contract, leave his service ; we promise to do everything in our power to appre- hend and deliver the same into the hands of his Pa- troon, or attorney, that he may be proceeded against, according to the customs of the country as occasion may require. "XX. From all judgments given by the cour's of the Patroons for upwards of fifty guilders ($20), there maybe an appeal to the Company's Commander and Council in New Netherland. " XXI. In regard to such ]irivate persons as on their own account, or others in the service of their masiers here (not enjoying the same privileges as the Pa- troons), shall be inclined to go thither and settle; they shall with the approbation of the Director and Council there, be at liberty to take up as much land, and take possession thereof, as they shall be able properly to improve, and shall enjoy the same in full property either for themselves or masters. " XXII. They shall have free liberty, of hunting and fow'ing, as well by water as by land, generally, and in public and private woods and rivers, about their colonies,^ according to the orders of the Director and Council. " XXIII. Whosoever whether colonists of Patroons, or free persons for themselves, or other particulars for their masters, shall discover any shores, bays, or other fit places for erecting fisheries, or the making of salt ponds, they may take possession thereof and begin to work on them in their own absolute property, to the exclusion of all others. I Trading stations. 2 Plantatious. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 49 And it is consented to tlint the Patroons of Colo- nists may send ships along the coast of New Nciher- land, on the cod fishery, and witii the fish they catch 10 trade to Italy, or other neutral countries, paying in such cases to the Company for recognition six guilders (82.40) per last; and if they should come with their lading hither, they shall be at liberty to proceed to Italy, though they shall not, under pretext of this consent, or from the company, carry any goods there, on pain of arbitrary punishment; and it remaining in the breast of the company to put a supercargo on board each ship, as in the eleventh article. " XXIV. In case any of the colonists should, by his industry and diligence, discover any minerals, ])reci(ius stones, crj'stals, marbles, or such like, or any pearl fishery, the same shall be the property of the Patroon or Patroons of such colonie ; giving and or- dering the discoverer such premium as the Patroon shall beforehand have stipulated with such colonist by contract. And the Patroons shall be exempt fr m all recognition to the company for the term of eight years, and pay only for freight, to bring them over, two i)er cent., and after the aforesaid eight years, for recognition and freight, the one-eighth part of what the same may be worth. "XXV. The company will take all the colonists, as well free as those in service under their protection, and the same against all outlandish and inlandish wars and powers, with the forces they have there, as much as lies in their power, defend. " XXVI. Whoever shall settle any colonie out of the limit of Manhattes Island, shall be obliged to satisfy the Indians for the land they shall settle upon, and may extend or enlarge the limits of their colonie.s, if they settle a proportionate number of Colonists thereon. " XXVII. The Patroons and colonists shall in par- ticular and in the speediest manner, endeavor to find out ways and means whereby they may support a min- ister and school-master, that thus the service of God, and zeal for religion may not grow cool, and be ne- glected among them ; and that they do, for the first, procure a comforter of the sick there. " XXVIII. The colonies that shall happen to lie on the respective rivers, or islands (that is to say, each river or island lor itself), shall be at liberty to appoint a deputy, who shall give information to the Comman- der and Council of that Western quarter, of all things relating to his colonie, and who are to further matters relating thereto, of which deputies there shall be one altered or changed every two years; and all colonies shall be obliged, at least once in every twelve months, to make exact report of their colonie, and lands there- about, to the commander and council there, in order to be transmitted hither. " XXIX. The colonists shall not be permitted to make any woollen, linen, or cotton cloth, nor weave any other stuffs there, on pain of being banished, and as perjurers to be arbitrarily punished. "XXX. The company will use their endeavours to supply the colonists with as many blacks as they con- veniently can, on the conditions hereafter to be made; in such manner, however that they shall not be bound to do it for a longer time than they shall think proper- " XXXI. The company promises to finish the fort on the island of the Manhattes, and to put it in a pos- ture of defence without delay." It will be noted that under the first article of this Plan, or charter, of Freedoms and Exemptions, the privilege of becoming Patroons, with all their rights, powers, and exemptions, hereditary and otherwise wr.s confined solely to the members, that is the stock- holders, of the West India Company. Other persons however, could, with the permission of the Director ard Council of New Netherland, take up as much land as they could improve, "and enjoy the same in full property either for themselves or others," but without any of the advantages and privileges con- ferred upon the Patroons. These were styled Free Colonists. Under these clauses the colonizing of the territory of New Netherland began. While the charter was in process of discussion and formation in the Assembly of the XIX., which it will be recollected was composed of directors chosen from the several chambers of the West India Company, certain directors of the Amsterdam Chamber, which had been specially charged with the care and super- vision of New Netherland, as soon as it became certain that the charter would be approved by the Company and ratified by the States-General, sent out to agents to purchase for them, the Indian title to certain lands in different parts of New Netherland, so that they might be ready to constitute themselves Patroons under the charter, as soon as it should finally pass and go into cfl'ect. The first of these were Samuel Godyn and Samuel Blommaert, whose agents, sent out some time pre- viously, on June 1st, 1729, a few days before the passing of the charter, bought for them of the Delaware Indians, the lands on the southwest side of Delaware Bay from Cape Henlopen thirty-two miles northwardly in length, and two miles inland in width. As these were Dutch miles, the tract was 128 English miles long and eight miles broad. After the passage of the charter and on the 19th of June, 1729, Godyn notified the Chamber of Am- sterdam that he had sent out agents to purchase lands, and declared "that he now in quality of 'Patroon' has undertaken to occupy the Bay of the South River, on the conditions (the charter) concluded in the last Assembly of the XIX., as he hath likewise advised the Director Pieter Minuit, and charged him to register the same there."' > I. O CiUl., Appendix S, p. 479. 50 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Minuit iu due time with his Council executed and passed the grant, or "transport" as the Dutch termed the instrument, and sent it to Godyn in Holland. In 1841 Mr. J. Romeyn Brodhead found the original document in the West India House at the Hague, brought it back to New York, and it is now deposited in the State Library at Albany. It bears date the 15th of July 1630, and bears the sig- natures of Pieter Minuit and his Council, — the only signatures of those officials known to be iu existence, and is the first title given by civilized men to lands in the present State of Delaware, and the first in New Netherland under the charter of Freedoms and Ex- emptions of 1629. Its date is two years before Lord Baltimore's charter of Maryland from Charles the First, and fifty-two years prior to William Penn's charter of Pennsylvania from Charles II. The name Godyn and Blommaert gave to their "Colonie" was " Zwanandael ;" in English, "Swansdale." The fol- lowing is a translation of this first conveyance for any part of New Netherland. TRANSPORT. The DireHor and Couicil of New Xithirland to Samu'l Godi/n and Samvl Blommae I. Col. Uist. N. Y., 94. » I. Col. Uist., 107. they, therefore, with the approbation of their High Mightinesses, hereby make known to all and every the inhabitants of this Slate, or its allies and friends, who may be disposed to take up and cultivate lands there, and to make use for that purpose of the harbors of these countries, that they may henceforth convey thither in the company's ships, such cattle merchan- dise and property as they shall deem advisable ; and receive the returns, they, or their agents may obtain therefor in those parts ; on condition that all the goods shall first be brought to the Company's store, so as to be put on shipboard all at once, in the best manner, on payment of the following duties and freights ; and the Directors will take care that they shall be sent thither by the safest conveyance ; — On all merchandises going thither, there shall be paid to the company here [an export dxfij) a duty of ten per cent, in money, proportionably to their value ; and on those coming thence hither [an import duty) fifteen per cent, there, in kind or money, at the choice of the Company or its Agent; eighty-five remaining for the owner. And if any one happen to commit an error, in the valuation of his goods, the Company shall be at liberty to take such goods, paying one- sixth more than they are entered at ; but all concealed and smuggled goods, either in this country or that, which may be discovered to have been brought on board the Company's ships, by secret plans or other cunning contrivances, shall be immediately forfeited and confiscated to the profit of the said Company, without any right of action accruing thereby." And after specifying rules for freight charges, it continues thus ; — "And whereas it is the Company's intention to cause those countries to be peopled and brought into cultivation more and more, the Director and Council there, shall be instructed to accommodate every one according to his condition and means, with as much land as he can properly cultivate, either by himself or with his family. Which land thus conceded to any person in the name of the Company, shall re- main the property of him, his heirs, or assigns, pro- vided he shall pay to the Company after it hiis been pastured or cultivated four years, the lawful tenths of all fruit, grain, seed tobacco, cotton, and such like, as well as of the increase of all sorts of cattle; of which property a proper deed shall be given, on con- dition thut hi3 truly undertakes the cultivation or pasture thereof. Failing therein, he shall incur, in addition to the loss of such land, such penalties and fines as shall be mutually agreed on at the time of the grant. To which penalties and fines his suc- cessors and assigns shall be also bound. And in order to obviate all confusion and losses, which have formerly arisen therefrom, and are hereafter to be expected in a still graver degree, no one shall hence- forward be allowed to possess or hold any lands or houses in those parts, that have not previously come through the hands of the Company. 54 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. The Company, subject to the High and Mighty Lords States-General, shall take care that the places and countries there shall be maintained in peace and quietness, in proper police and justice, under its ministers or their deputies, conformably to the regu- lations and instructions thereupon already established and issued, or to be hereafter enacted and given, upon a knowledge and experience of affairs. All those who will be inclined to go thither, to inhabit the country or to trade, shall severally declare under their signatures, that they will voluntarily sub- mit to these regulations, and to the orders of the Company, and shall allow all questions and differ- ences there arising, to be decided by the ordinary courts of justice, which shall be established in that country, and freely suffer there the execution of the sentences and verdicts, without any further opposi- tion. And shall ])ay for passage and board in the state-room, one guilder, in the cabin twelve stuivers, and between decks, eight stuivers, per diem." ' The effect of thus throwing open to the world the trade of New Netherland, was to increase at once its population, and the development of the agricultural capacity of the country. Capital was attracted, colonists came over from Holland, and Patroonships and individual grants of lands were freely taken up. Englishmen and their families driven from New England by Puritan persecution, — a persecution un- ])aralleled in North America save by that inflicted by ihe Spaniards in Mexico, fled to the Dutch pro- vince, became subjects of the New Netherland gov- ernment, and as grantees of its lands took the oaihs of allegiance to the West India Company and to the States-General of Holland. The old disputes between the Company and the Patroons as to their respective rights, though modi- fied, still continued. At last in January, 1G40, the matter was taken up by the States-General, the Assembly of the Nineteen, and the Patroons, with a determination to come to a final settlement of the whole subject. Debates, discussions, and negotiations, were actively continued till July of the s;ime year, with the result, that an entirely new charter of " Freedoms and Exemptions" was framed which met the assent of all parties. This was reported to the States-General on the 19th of July, 1640, duly en- acted, and went into immediate operation. The first charter of " Freedoms and Exemptions of 1629," and this new charter of 1640, together, are the foundation of civilized government as originally established, in New York, and successfully maintained there during the entire period of its possession by the Dutch nation. Before describing the system of government, civil and ecclesiastical law, and land tenures, thus founded and set in operation, it is necessary to a right under- standing of the subject to set forth at length, in its U. Col. Hist., 113. own words, the new charter of 1640, so that there can be no misunderstanding of these most important instrumeats as to what they do, or do )iot, contain. It is entitled ; — " Freedoms and Exemptions granted and accorded by the Directors of the General Incorporated West India Company at the Assembly of the XIX., with the approbation of the High and Mighty Lords States General of the free United Netherlands, to all Patroons, Masters, or Private persons who will plant any Colonies or introduce cattle in New Netherland. Exhibited 19th July, 1640. "All good inhabitants of the Netherlands and all others inclined to plant any Colonies in New Nether- land shall be at liberty to send tjiree or four persons in the Company's ships going thither, to examine the circumstances there, on condition that they swear to the articles, as well as the officers and seamen, as far as they relate to them, and pay for board and passage out and home, to wit, those who eat in the master's cabin, fifteen stivers per day, and those who go and eat in the orlop, shall have their board and passage gratis, and in case of an attack, offensive or defensive, they shall be obliged to lend a hand with the others, on condition of receiving, should any of the enemy's ships be overcome, their share of the booty pro rata, each according to his quality, to wit — the Colonists eating out of the Cabin shall be rated with the sea- men, and those eating in the cabin with the Com- pany's servants who board there and have the lowest rate of pay. " In the selection of lands, those who shall have first notified and presented themselves to the Com- pany, whether Patroons or private Colonists, shall be preferred to others who may follow. " In case any one be deceived in selecting ground, or should the place by him chosen afterwards not please him, he will, upon previous representation to the Governor and Council then be at liberty to select another situation. " For Patroons and Feudatories of New Nether- land, shall be acknowledged all such as shall ship hence, and plant there a Colonic of fifty souls, above fifteen years of age, withm the space of three years after having made a declaration and given notice thereof to some Chamber of the Company here or to the Governor there ; namely, one-third part within the year, and so forth, from year to year, until the number be completed ; on pain of losing, through notorious neglect, the obtained Freedoms and cattle. But they shall be warned that the Company reserves the Island Manhattes to itself. "All Patroons and Feudatories shall, on requesting it, be granted Venia Tesfandi, or the power to dispose of, or bequeath, his fief by Will. "For Masters or Colonists, shall be acknowledged, those who will remove to New Netherland with five The origin and history of the manors. 55 S )ul9 above fifteen years; to all such, our Governor tlu-re shall grant in property one hundred niorgena, Ilhineland measure, of. land, contiguous one to the other, wherever they please to select. " And the Patroons, of theni.selves or by their agents, at the places where they will plant their Colonies, shall have the privilege to extend the latter one mile (consisting of, or estimated at, 1600 Rhine- land perches) along the coast, bay, or a navigable river, and two contiguous miles landward in; it being well understood, that no two Patroonships shall be selected on both sides of a river or bay, right opposite to each other; and that the Company retains to itself the property of the lauds lying between the limits of the Colonies, to dispose thereof hereafter according to its pleasure; and that the Patroons and Colonists shall be obliged togive each other an outlet and issue, {iiijttewfeghen ende uxjitewatertn) at the nearest place and at the smallest expense; and in case of disagree- ment, it shall be settled in the presence and by the decision of the Governor for the time being. "The Patroons shall forever possess all the lands situate within their limits, together with the produce, superficies, minerals, rivers and fountains thereof, | uith high, low and middle jurisdiction, hunting, fish- ing, fowling and milling, the lands remaining allodial, but the jurisdiction as of a perpetual hereditary fief, devolvable by death as well to females as to males, and fealty and homage for which is to be rendered to the Company, on each of such occasions, with a pair of iron gauntlets, redeemable by twenty guilders within a year and six weeks, at the Assembly of the XIX., liere, or before the Governor there ; with this under- standing, that in case of division of said fief or juris- diction, be it high, middle or low, the parts shall be and remain of the same nature as was originally con- ferred on the w-hole, and fealty and homage must be rendered for each part thereof by a pair of iron gauntlets, redeemable by twenty guilders, as afore- said. "And should any Patroon, in course of time, hap- pen to prosper in his Colonic to such a degree as to be able to found one or more towns, he shall have authority to appoint officers and magistrates there, and make use of the title of his Colonie, according to the pleasure and the quality of the persons, all saving tlje Company's regalia. " And should it happen that the dwelling places of private Colonists become so numerous as to be ac- counted towns, villages or cities, the Company shall give orders respecting the subaltern government, magistrates and ministers of justice, who shall be nominated by the said towns and villages in a triple number of the best qualified, from which a choice i and selection is to be made by the Governor and Council ; and those shall determine all questions and suits within their district. " The Patroons who will send Colonies thither, shall furnish them with due instruction agreeably to the mode of government both in police and justice establi-ihed, or to be established, by the Assembly of the XIX., which they shall first exhibit to the Direc- tors of the respective Chambers, and have approved by the Assembly of the XIX. " The Patroons and Colonists shall have the privi- lege of sending their people and property there in the Company's ships, on condition of swearing alle- giance, and paying to the Company for the convey- ance of the people, as in the first article, and for freight of the goods requisite for their bouwery, five per cent, on the cost of the goods here, without, how- ever, including herein the cattle, on the freight of which the Company shall be liberal. " But in case it should come to pass that the Com- pany have no ships to dispatch, or that there be no room in the sailing vessels, in such a case the Patroons and Colonists can, upon previously communicating their determination to, and obtaining the consent of the Company in WTiting, send their own ships thither, provided, in going and returning, they shall not leave the ordinary track laid down, and take a supercargo, whose board shall be at the expense of the Patroons I or Colonists, and whose wages shall be paid by the Company; on pain, in case of contravention, of forfeiting their ship and goods to, and for the behalf of, the Company, it remaining optional with the Patroons, during the term of the current grant, and no longer, to convey over their cattle, wares and people in the Company's ships, in their own or in chartered vessels. " And, whereas, it is the Company's intention first to settle the Island of the Manhattes, it shall pro- visionally be the staple of all produce and wares accruing on the North river and the country there- about, before they can be sent further, except those which by nature itself are useless there, or cannot be brought there except with great loss to the owners, in which case the latter shall be bound to give timely notice of such inconvenience to the Company here, or to the Governor and Council there, that it be pro- vided for, according as the circumstances shall be found to require. "All Patroons, Colonists and inhabitants there, as well as the stockholders in the Company here, shall be privileged to sail and trade to the entire coast, from Florida to Newfoundland, on the following con- ditions : — " First, that all goods which will be sent hence for sale there, whether freighted by the Company, or by Colonists, or the stockholders themselves, must be brought into the Company's stores for inspection and payment of the proper duties, to wit: ten per cent, i on the cash cost of the article here, besides convoy- freight and average, an agreement being made for the freights of what may be sent in the CoTupany's ships; and bulk will not be allowed to be broken any where except at the Manhattes, or such place as the Com- pany here may order, so as to be at liberty, after 56 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. proper inspection of tlieir loading and the entry thereof, to depart to whatever place they think proper. "And on the other wares which will be sent thence hither, shall be paid here, over and above the convoy duty granted by the State to the Company, five per cent., according to the valuation to be made here, on such penalty as aforesaid ; but an agreement must be made with the Governor and Council there, for the freight of any of the goods that are being sent from there in the Company's ships, as aforesaid ; and on all beavers, otters and other j^eltries, which will be sent from there here, shall be paid to the Governor and Council there, ten per cent., all in kind, and due receipt for the payment thereof, .shall be brought along, on pain of confiscation of all the furs which will be found not to have paid any thing for the be- hoof of the Company, and with that to be exempt from further duty. " And in case said private ships, in going or com- ing, or in ranging along the coast from Florida to Newfoundland, happen to capture any prizes, they shall, in like manner be obliged to bring the same, or to cause the same to be brought, to the Governor and Council in New Netherland, or to the Chamber whence they respectively sailed, to be rewarded by them, and the third part thereof shall be retained for the Company, before deducting his Highness' and the State's portion, the two other third parts for them- selves, in return for their incurred expenses and risk, all in pursuance of the Company's order. " In like manner they shall not be at liberty to de- part thence with their goods obtained in barter, with- out first returning to the said place, to enter their goods there and to obtain proper clearance, signed by the Governor and Council, and they shall be bound to return to this country, with their ships and yachts, to the place they sailed from, in order to discharge all their freight into the Company's stores, according to the register and clearance to be brought from thence, on pain of forfeiting their ship and goods for the Company's behoof, should they go aind break bulk elsewhere, or have any unregistered goods on board. " The Company promises, during the continuance of the present charter and no longer, not to burden the Patroons and Colonists in that country, either with customs, toll, excise, imposts or any other con- tributions, and after the expiration hereof, at farthest, with no greater duty than is imposed on goods in this country. " The Company shall not take from the service of Patroons or Colonists, their man servants or maid servants, even though some person should solicit it; nor receive them, much less suffer them to go from their master's service to that of another, during the term of such years as they are bound for; and if any man servant or maid servant run away, or take his freedom contrary to contract, the Company shall, according to its means, cause such to be delivered into the hands of their masters, to be proceeded against according to the circumstances of the case. "From all definitive judgments pronounced by the Courts of the Patroons or Colonists, for an amount exceeding one hundred guilders, or from such as en- tail infamy, also from all sentences pronounced in matters criminal, on ordinary prosecution, conform- able to the custom of this country, an appeal shall lie to the Governor and Council of the Company in New Netherland. "All Patroons, Colonists and inhabitants are al- lowed free hunting and fishing, both by land and by water, generally in public woods and rivers in the extent of their lands, according to the order to be made thereupon by the Governor and Council; and the Patroons exclusively within the limits of their Colonies, with the clear understanding that the Governor and Council shall not be excluded there- from. " All Patroons, inhabitants or Colonists, are also allowed to send ships along the coast of New Nether- land and the countries circumjacent thereunto, to fish for Cod, &c., and to proceed with the catch straight to Italy or other neutral countries, on condition of paying to the Company for duty, in such case, six guilders per last, and on coming here with their freight, it shall be allowable and sufl^cient to pay the Company the custom dues alone, without conveying, under pretence of this consent, any other goods else- where, on pain of arbitrary punishment, it remaining at the pleasure of the Company to put a supercargo on board each ship, on such conditions and terms as hereinbefore set forth. " If any Patroons, inhabitants or Colonists happen by their industry, diligence or otherwise to discover any minerals, precious stones, crystals, marbles, pearl- fisheries or such like within the limits of their lands, all such Patroons and Colonists shall give one-fifth part of the nett proceeds to the Company, which for this purpose shall have the power to appoint one or more inspectors, at the charge of said mines and pearlfisheries; but any one finding such without their limits, the same shall belong to the Company on pay- ing the discoverer such premium as the merits of the case shall demand. "The Company shall take all Colonists,' whether free or bound to service, under their protection, de- fend them as far as lies in their power with the force which it has there, against all domestic and foreign wars and violence, on condition that the Patroons and Colonists shall, in such case, put themselves in a suit- able state of defence for which purpose each male emigrant shall be obliged to provide himself, at his own expense, with a gun or musket of the Company's regular calibre, or a cutlass and side arms. "And no other Religion shall be publicly admitted in New Netherland except the Reformed, as it is at present preached and practiced by public authority THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 57 in the United Netherlands ; and for this purpose the Company shall provide and maintain good and suit- able preachers, schoolmasters and comforters of the sick. " The particular Colonies which hai)pen to lie on the respective rivers, bays or islands shall have the privilege (to wit, each river or island for itself) of designating a deputy who shall give the Governor and Council of that country information respecting his Colonic, and f)romote its interests with the Coun- cil: one of which deputies shall be changed every two years, and all the Colonies shall be obliged to communicate to the Governor and Council there a pertinent report, at least every twelve months, of their condition and of the lands in their vicinity. "The Company shall exert itself to provide the Patroons and Colonists, on their order, with as many Blacks as possible, without however being further or longer obligated thereto than shall be agreeable. "The Company reserves unto itself all large and small tythes, all waifs, the right of mintage, laying out highways, erecting forts, making war and peace, togetiier with all wildernesses, founding of cities, towns and churches, retaining the su])reme authority, sovereignty and supremacy, the interpretation of all obscurity which may arise out of this Grant, with such understanding, however, that nothing herein contained shall alter or diminish what has been granted heretofore to the Patroons in regard to high, middle and low jurisdiction. " The Company shall, accordingly, appoint and keep there a Governor, competent Councillors, OflScers and other Ministers of Justice for the pn - tection of the good and the punishment of the wicked ; which Governor and Councillors, who are now, or may be hereafter, appointed by the Company, shall take cognizance, in the first instance, of matters appertaining to the freedom, supremacy, domain, finances and rights of the General West India Com- pany; of complaints which any one (whether stranger, neighbor or inhabitant of the aforesaid country) may make in case of privilege, innovation, dissuetude, customs, usages, laws or pedigrees ; de- clare the same corrupt or abolish them as bad, if circumstances so demand ; of the cases of minor children, widows, orphans and other unfortunate per- sons, regarding whom complaint shall first be made to the Council holding prerogative jurij^diction in order to obtain justice there; of all contracts or obligations; of matters pertaining to possession of benefices, fiefs, cases of lesje majestatis, of religion and all criminal matters and excesses prescribed and unchallenged, and all persons by prevention may receive acquittance from matters there complained of; and generally take cognizance of, and administer law and justice in, all cases appertaining to the suprem- acy of the Company." Owing to the difficulties which arose at the close of Kieft's administration, and continued duriug the 5 earlier years of that of Stuyvesant, between the Commonalty of New Nethcrland and the West India Company as represented by those Directors, growing out of the restrictions upon trade and traders estab- lished by the Company and strictly enforced by their officers, the States-Guiicral, after the delegates. Van der Donck, Couwenhoveu and Bout, wlio were sent by the Commonalty to Holland, had explained the mat- ters in question, enacted on the 24th of May 1(550, a third Charter of " Freedoms and Exemptions," which modified somewhat the clauses of that of 10-40 re- lating to trade, and the administration of justice in some minor points.' It did not however vary in the least the principles of the former Charters, or the system of settlement and Colonization by them fixed and established in relation to land and its tenure. It is therefore unnecessary to refer to it more par- ticularly in this connexion. These three were tlie only charters of " Freedoms and Exemptions," in force in New Netherlaud during the entire Dutch domination. 5 The Nature of the Dutch Systems of Governmfnt and Law established in New Netherlands and of the Patroonships there. To comprehend the system of government, laws, and religion, established in New Netherlaud, through the West India Company, by the Dutch republic un- der these Charters of Freedoms and Exemptions, a brief account of that of the '' Fatherland," or " Pa- tria," as that republic was called in its province in America, must be given. The form of government of the Seven United Prov- inces was republican, the law was the Koman law, and the church was the established Reformed Cimrch of Holland in accordance with the Synod of Dort. All were transplanted to New Netherland, and there existed and flourished until its capture by the lingiish in 1(5(54. Nine years later when the Dutch re-con- quered it, all were re-introduced, a Dutch Governor re-appointed, and New Netherland replaced in its original position, except as to the names of its three largest towns which were changed. New York, as the English had called it, was rc-named "New Orange," Albany was re-named " Willemstadt," and Kingston " Swanenburgh," instead of New Amsterdam, Bevcrs- wyck, and Wiltwyck, their original a))i)cllations. The Province of Holland the largest of the seven United Provinces formed at an early period a por- tion of the Kingdom of the West Franks, and about the year 922 was conferred by Charles the Simi)le upon Count Dirk, who thus became the first "Count of Holland." In 92.) Charles ceded it to Henry the Fowler, King of the East Franks, with the rest of the Kingdom of Lotharingia, the Count of Holland still being its own local sovereign. The succe.'sive Counts 1 1. Cul. Uist., 4Ul. 58 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of Holland ruled over their little province, to which in the course of time they added the adjoining prov- ince of Zeeland, for four hundred year^ of unbroken male descent when their race died out, and the Count- ship passed into the hands of the Counts of Hainault. From them it devolved upon the Dukes of Bavaria, the last representative of which house was dispos- sessed by Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy, who held the rest of the Netherlands under his rule. By the marriage of his daughter, Mary of Burgundy, with the Archduke Maximilian of Austria, the entire Netherlands passed from the House of Burgundy to the Imperial House of Austria. In 1496, Philip the Fair married Joanna, daughter of Ferdinand and Isabella of Castile and Arragon, and the Netherlands, through this marriage came under the dominion of the Kings of Spain. Philip the Fair was succeeded by his only son, the Emperor Charles the Fifth, who was born in the Netherlands, and ruled the country as a part of his empire till 1555, when he abdicated in fa- vor of his son Philip II. By Philip II. as King of Spain, through savage persecutions and ferocious wars, were the people of the Netherlands driven into a rebellion and war of Independence, which after an heroic struggle of forty years continuance, Avas suc- cessfully terminated by the famous twelve years truce of 1609.> One of the strange results of this truce, was the voyage of Hudson in search of a western pas.sage to Cathay, and his momentous discovery of the Bay of New York and the magnificent river which has im- mortalized his name. Another remarkable result, was the establishment in the same year of the Bank of Amsterdam, which so long ruled the exchanges of Europe, and through which, the financial transactions of the first merchants and Patroous of New Nether- land were subsequently carried on. During the whole period iu which these different Princes, Kings, and Emperors, possessed the Nether- lands, they ruled the provinces of Holland and Zee- land, which together comprised about five-eighths of the area of the "United Provinces," not in their royal capacities, but as " Counts of Holland." These two Provinces with, Friesland, Groningen, Utrecht, Guelderland, and Overyssel, comprising the other three-eighths of the Netherlands, formed the " Seven United Provinces" of the Republic, which founded Christian government and Christian civilization in New York. What was the nature and constitution of this Repub- lic? A Republic which not only established its own independent existence as one of the nations of Eu- rope, but humbled forever the pride and power of Spain then one of the greatest of those nations. A Republic which founded in the New World a system of government, the principles of which to-day form 1 Maasilorp's Introduction to his translation of Grotius" treatise on I)iitcU Jurisprudence, p. iv. the [basis, upon which rests the constitution of that greater Republic which under the name of the United States of America dominates the Western Hemi- sphere. The Republic of the Netherlands was a small coun- try, in area but a trifle larger than Wales, but its population of about two millions in 1609, of Teutonic origin, was dense, reliant, and self-supporting. Each of the seven provinces into which it was divided con- tained a number of cities and large towns, each gov- erned by a Board of Managers styled a ' Vroedschap.' These Boards of Managers were self-electing close cor- porations, the members of which were appointed for life from the general body of the citizens. Whenever vacancies occurred these Boards either filled them by a direct election of new members, or by making a double or triple nomination of names, and submitting them to the Stadtholder, or Governor, of the prov- ince, who selected one to fill the vacancy. This Stadtholder was, originally, the representative of the Count, or the Sovereign, but at the period of which we are treating, he was elected by a body called the " States-Provincial" of each Province, which con- sisted of deputies elected by the Boards of Managers and Nobles of the Province. These " States Provin- cial" managed all the affairs of each Province for it- self, the Provinces in their domestic concerns being entirely independent of each other. They were the representative assemblies of the numerous Munici- palities and Nobles of which each Province was com- posed. The "States Provincial" had also conferred upon them, another, and most important, power, one which then existed in no other part of the civilized world. For neither in the Swiss republic, nor in the Italian republics of the middle ages, did a precisely similar power exist. This was the election of envoys to the Supreme Legislature of the republic, — the States General. The members of this body so elected were not representatives in the usual sense of that term but envoys from their respective Provinces to the Su- preme Parliament of the nation, in which each Prov- ince, though it could have as many envoys as it pleased, had but one vote. These envoys were bound by in- structions in writing from their constituents the " States Provincial," whom they were obliged to con- sult in all doubtful or new matters before acting upon them. Neither war nor peace could be made, nor troops nor money raised, without a unanimous vote of the whole seven Provinces by their envoys in the States-General. The title of this Supreme Council of Parliament of the Republic, was " The High and Mighty Lords the States -General." It received am- bassadors, appointed its own to other nations, and conducted, wholly, the foreign relations of the repub- lic. Each Province, by one of its deputies or envoys presided in turn for a week. Its Greffier, or Clerk read all papers, put all questions to vote, and an- nounced the result. Its sessions were held at the Hague, in a very handsome oblong apartment in the THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 59 Binneiihof, the old palace which formed a part of the ancient chateau of the Counts of Holland, which re- mains to this day.' In these Independent " States Provincial," their representative envoys, and theStates-Creneral in which they sat, we see the origin of the Independent Sover- eign states of the Federal Constitution of 1787, the Senators who represent those Sovereign States, and that great body, the Senate of the United States of America, in which they sit. So ancient and honor- able is that system and doctrine of State right;', upon the continued preservation of which in their integrity depends the existence of the American Union. The source of power in the " States Provincial " of Holland was in the constituencies of the deputies to them who were the Municipal Councils of the towns and cities, and the College of Nobles, by which the deputies were elected. To them was each deputy responsible, and under their instructions alone he acted. Holland was an aggregate of independent towns and cities each administering its own taxation, finances, and domestic affairs, and making its own ordinances. Its inhabitants were not on an equality. To entitle a man to every municipal franchise, he must have ac- quired the greater or lesser burger-right — hiu yer recht" — either by inheriting it, by marriage, or by purchase. In the latter case a larger sum was re- ()uired for the great burger right and a smaller sum for the lesser. In either case, however, the amount was not very large. Only a year's previous residence was necessary for any foreigner to obtain it. The privileges it conferred were, freedom of trade, exemp- tion from tolls, special privileges and preferences in the conduct of lawsuits, and an exclusive eligibility of election to municipal office. The |)rivileges of the two classes of burghers varied only in degree. The city and town governments consisted of a Board of Burgomasters and Schepens, and a Schout, that is a Board of magistrates and aldermen, and a sheriff who was also a prosecuting officer. These Burgom;istei-s and Schepens, provided for the l>ublic safety, attended to police matters, called out the military when needed, assessed all taxes, and ad- ministered all financial, and civic matters. They were elected either by the general body of the citizens possessing a small property (jualification, or by the '• Vroedschapen,'' or Boards of Managers mentioned before, who were themselves elected by the general body of qualified citizens, the custom varying in dif- ferent towns and Provinces. Such was the form of political liberty which con- stituted the great strength of the Dutch Republic, by which it conquered its own independence of Spain, and which it carried to, and established in, ' Maaetlorp's intruductiun to liis translatiuD of Grotius, vi. I. Brod. Hist. N. Y., 454. New York.'^ It is well summed up by Brodhead in these words, " The self-relying burghers governed the towns; the representatives, of the towns, and of the rural nobility, governed the several Provinces, and the several States of the respective Provinces claimed supreme jurisdiction within their own pre- cincts." The system of the Dutch Republic was a thorough system of town government, expanded to meet the needs of a national governmental organi- zation. It was also a strikingly conservative as well as effective form of government, and after the termina- tion of the twelve years truce with Spain in l(j21,it enabled the Netherlands to carry on that brilliant series of hostilities against Spain which, in 1G48, re- sulted in her final acknowledgment of the United Pro- vinces as an Independent Nation.' Subsequently to that event the Republic enlarged and increased the machinery of her government — developing it further upon the same principles to meet the enlarged sphere of action upon which she had entered, but this ic is unnecessary to describe here. There was in this system of government one princi- ple which must be particularly noticed, one which has had but scant mention from American historians, and yet upon it rests the system of colonization begun by the Dutch in New Netherland, and that is the rights, powers, privileges, and position of the nobles of the Netherlands in the government of their native land. The Dutch people of the United Provinces at the date of Hudson's discovery of New Netherland, and during the period of its settlement and possession by that Republic consisted, by their own law, of two classes, "Nobles" and "Commoners." The Com- moners were subdivided into "Gentlemen by birth," and "Common people." Thus practically making three classes of Dutch citizens. They are thus described, and the definition of each given, by the most famous of the great lawyers of Holland ;— * "From descent comes the distinction whereby some are born Noble and some Commoners. Noble by birth are those sprung from a father whose* ancestors have, from times of old, been ac. knowledged as noble, or who was himself ennobled by the sovereign. For some families have held their rank for a period so far distant, and so fully acknowledged, that no proof is necessary. Other families have been en- nobled from services, or favors subsequently bestowed. Commoners were formerly of two classes, such as Gentlemen by birth and the common people. ^Firet learned in Hollaml by the Euiilish self exiled Bruwniati it was carried by tlieni to Plymoutli their new home across the Alhiiitic, and was thus tlie origin of the town and township system estal>li:ilied in New Kn^land. 3 1. Sir Wm. Temple's Works, 6S, 70, 12C, 127, 131, l:!!>-142. * Grotins, cli. XIV. ; also note IX. to Benson's Memoir, II. N. Y. Hist. Coll., 2d series, p. 138. 60 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. It seems formerly that Gentlemen by birth were those who from generation to generation were de- scended from free and honorable persons. These, being favoured by different Counts [of Holland], and especially by Count Floris, who was disliked by the nobles (which gave rise to a conspiracy against him and ultimately to his death), had a right to wear arms publicly, as a token of descent, to ride with a spur, and be exempt from taxes. At present [1620, in which yearGrotius wrote] all these matters, together with others, having become general by practice, the only distinction is, that those who are gentlemen born are selected as judges of the Bailiff's Court, in the place of vassals [or tenants], and were consequently exempt from serving in the office of schepens, or civic magistrates." The Seven United Provinces were composed of the patroonships of nobles, cities, and towns, the two latter possessing municipal privileges, or rather, privileges as municipalities, similar to those possessed as individuals by the nobles. Both originated in the ancient Teutonic system of military tenures modified by the Roman law and the spirit of commercial enter- prise. There were then in the United Provinces,' no small independent farms; isolated houses scattered through the country did not exist. The people dwelt in the towns and cities, and only the nobles on large estates in the country with great buildings, strong- holds, and sometimes churches, to accommodate themselves and their numerous retainers whom they were bound to protect. In the single province of Holland alone, the largest of the seven provinces of the republic, there existed, and had existed for more than a century prior to the Discovery of New Nether- land, three hundred of these Patroonships, or fiefs as they were called,' to the mutual advantage of their owners and their tenants or vassals, as the then flourishing and powerful condition of the Dutch re- public fully proves. There was no clashing of interests between the nobles, the commoners, and the municipalities. Each held their rights and privileges from the same sover- eign authority. The latter were in fact incorporated nobles, so to speak. The people of the towns, 'as the military features of the feudal system gradually weakened, demanded and obtained of the Sovereign authority. Count, King, or Emperor, the same rights and privileges as a body, which the nobles possessed individually. The Sovereign, as Lord Paramount, granted these as they were desired, for he was per- fectly willing that the people of the towns should commute for specific annual sums the military and other feudal services to which he was entitled, just as the nobles did. The people, however, in the Dutch provinces, always claimed and demanded the right to fix the amount of these annual sums them- selves. This was always granted, and they ever held II. O'Call. 1302. tenaciously to this right of taxing themselves. In this manner town corporations and city corporations originated, in the Netherlands, and as such were in full vigor, with a happy, flourishing, and united population, not only when New Netherland was dis- covered, but for a very long period preceding that event. The magistrates of these municipalities, chosen by the people themselves, were the means by which they were united with the Sovereign power, and through which the latter communicated with the people of the municipalities themselves, just as the nobles were the point of union and communication between the same Sovereign power and their own vas- sals or tenants. The nobles formed a distinct House or College in each province, and sent deputies to the States of the Province, and the States-General, and also to the three Councils, of State, Accounts, and Admiralty. In the Council of State their deputy was the President, and in the States-General his was the first vote^ cast. "The Dutch Nobility" says the English author of the "Description of Holland" in 1743, seem to observe a medium between the loftiness of those of the same rank in some countries, and the meanness of others. The Italian Nobility do not scruple to trade: The French are nicer: yet they make no difficulty to marry a tradesman's daughter, if she be rich, and thereby capable of repairing a shattered Estate. The British Nobility do not differ from the French in this respect. The Germans abhor trade; and perhaps in effect of the general barbarous constitution of their country, Tyrant and Slave, disdain to mingle their blood with that of base plebeians, though their brethren of nature."' It was this combined and harmonious system of mingled municipalism and aristocracy, which gave ; the United Netherlands their great power and made them such a strong, conservative, and successful j nation. It was a system they had tried, and under which they had lived, for more than two centuries, which all classes approved, and with which they were fully satisfied and thoroughly familiar. Hence it was, that when tlie West India Company undertook to colonize New Netherland, they Aturally adopted for that new po.ssession the same system which they knew had always worked well in the old, which they had always been accustomed to, and which was in entire consonance with the views, habits, manners, • and customs, of the people of the Bataviau re- I public. It was not this system in New Netherland, but the ways and means of putting it into operation and carry- ing it out, which produced the delays, disputes, and changes, that began soon after the enactment of the charter of Freedoms and Exemptions of 1629, and only 2 " Description of Holland," p. 7C. This work, by an Englishman, resi- dent from infancy in Holland, was published in 1743, and is a full, fair and eood account of that countiy. 3 Ibid. ,79. I THE OKIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 61 ended with the adoption of the revised and amended charter of Freedoms and Exemptions of 1640. It is needful to consider only the most salient features of these instruments, for a simple reading of documents themselves, as above given in lull, will afford the best possible idea of the nature of the sys- tem of colonization, of w'hich they were the foun- dation, and upon which rests that civilization, which, increasing and improving in the course of years, and modified, not abrogated, by a subsequent change of dominion and rulers, now constitutes the pride and glory of the great Empire State of New York. They were drawn in accordance with the views and spirit of the age in which they had their birth, and should, and must, be judged in the light of that age if we wi)uld wish to form a lair and true opinion of them and the system they established. No more un- just, yet more common error, exists, than to make the views and spirit of this, our own age, the standard by which to judge the views, spiril, and actions of every age that has gone before it, and to praise or condemn, accordingly. Judged by the lights of the seventeenth century these charters of Dutch Colonization were extremely free and liberal, far more so than those of any other nation at that time. It must be remembered, too, that, they were the work of an armed commercial organization, of the nature of those then existing, intent upon its own interests, as well as those of the nation to which it belonged ; an organization equally well adapted to triumph in the pursuits of peace, or conquer in those of war. Essentially monopolies, as w-ere all the colonizing and commercial companies of that era in England, and in all the other European nations, the charter of Freedoms and Exemptions of 1629 confined its benefits and privileges to the members of the Dutch West Indian Company by which it was granted. This was changed by that of 1640 which threw them open to, "All good inhabitants of the Netherlands and all others inclined to plant any colonies in New, Netherland." The former acknowledged, and granted the rights, powers, and privileges, of Patroons, as they then existed in the United Provinces of the Netherlands, to those who would plant a "colonie," (that is estab- lish a plantation) of fifty souls above fifteen years of age, within four years in New Netherland, after noti- fying the proper authorities of their intention so to do. The latter reduced the time to three years, and by it all New Netherland was thrown open to the establishment of Patroonships, except the Island of Manhattan, which the Company reserved to itself. All Patroons under the first charter (Art V.) were permitted, after settling upon a location, to extend the limits of their "colonies," or plantations, four miles Dutch, {equal tn sixteen English) along the shore on one side of a navigable river, or two miles {eight English) on each side of the same, at their option. This was restricted by the second charter, to one Dutch mile along a navagable river, or two miles landward. The latter also provided for a class of colonists, not Patroons, in these words "For Masters or Colonists, shall be acknowledged, those who will remove to New Netherland with five souls above fifteen years; to all such, our Governor there shall grant in property one hundred morgens, (two hundred English acres) Rhine- land measure, of land, contiguous one to the other, wherever they please to select." Thus were provided for New Netherland colonists of the two upper classes then dwelling in the Republic of the United Provinces, nobles and commoners of the first class, as before described. Both of these classes, brought out the third, the common people, the boers, who were the men and women, whom they settled upon their "colonies" and farms. All the colonists, whether the Patroons, or of the Masters of farms, "Free Colonists," as they were styled in the charter of 1640, were freed from customs, taxes, excise, imposts, or any other contributions for the space of ten years." ^ The special powers, rights and privileges of Patroons are set forth in articles VI, VII, VIII, and IX, of the charter of 1629, and as revised, and slightly altered, are thus stated in the charter of 1640 ;— "The Patroons shall forever possess all the lands situate within their limits, together with the produce, superficies, minerals, rivers, and fountains thereof, with high, low, and middle jurisdiction, hunting, fishing, fowling, and milling, the lands remaining allodial, but the jurisdiction as of a perpetual hereditary fief, devolvable by death as well as to females as to males, and, fealty and homage for which is to be rendered to the Company, on each of such occasions, with a pair of iron gauntlets, redeemable by twenty guilders within a year and six weeks at the Assembly of the XIX here, or before the Governor there; with this understanding, that in case of divi- sion of said fief or jurisdiction, be it high, middle, or low, the parts shall be, and remain, of the same nature as was originally conferred upon the whole, and fealty and homage must be rendered for each part thereof by a pair of iron gauntlets, redeemable by twenty guilders as aforesaid. And should any Patroon, in course of time, happen to prosper in his colonie to such a degree as to be able to found one or more towns, he shall have authority to appoint officers and magistrates there, and make use of his Colonie, according to the pleasure and the quality of the persons, all saving the Company's regalia.^ And should it happen that the dwelling places ot private Colonists become so numerous as to be ac- 1 Charter of l''2n, art. XVIII. -Rigbts of Sovereignty. 62 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. counted towns, villages, or cities, the Company shall give orders respecting the subaltern government, magistrates, and ministers of justice, who shall be nominated by the said towns and villages in a triple number of the best qualified, from which a choice and selection is to be made by the Governor and Council ; and those shall determine all questions and suits within their district. The Patroons who will send colonies thither, shall furnish them with due instruction agreeably to the mode of government, both in police and justice,' established, or to be established by the Assembly of the XIX, which they shall fir.«t exhibit to the Directors of the respective chambers, and have approved by the Assembly of the XIX." The possession of the land, with everything, in, upon, or produced by it, as well as all matters of every kind, within the bounds of the patroonship, was first granted. Then follow the powers, rights, and privileges, the first of which was the high, middle, and low jurisdiction within the patroonship; a power necessarily appertaining to the ownership of the land, as requisite to the orderly government of the patroonship, the due protection of the tenants in their rights, and the determination of all contro- versies between themselves, or between themselves and the Patroon, or his agents, as well as the trial and punishment of criminal ofi'enses. "High juris- diction" means the power of capital punishment. Under the charter of 1629 (Art. XX), a right of appeal from all judgments of these courts, of fifty guilders (S20), and upwards, lay to the Governor and Council in New Netherland. By that of 1G40, the limit was increased to 100 guilders (§40), and the right extended to all cases of criminal sentences, and judgments entailing infamy upon any person. Thus the rights of all people were thoroughly protected. Next are enumerated the sole rights of hunting, fishing, fowling, and milling. These explain them- selves, except the last, — milling. This means, not the actual grinding, or manufacturing, but the right to erect, or control the erection of, all mills within the Patroonship. For every Patroon was to build a mill, or mills, for the use and benefit of the tenants or vassals, these terms being sinijilN' synonymous, of the Patroonship. These mills could, either be run by the Patroon or his agent, or rented by him to any one who w ished to run them, at a fixed rent or toll. But the Patroon was in all cases bound to provide the mills and appurtenances themselves. The Tenure by which the lands, rights, powers, privileges, and jurisdictions of the Patroons of New Netherland were held, is thus stated in the sixth article of the charter of 1629, '" to be holden from the Company as a perpetual inheritance, without it ever devolving again to the Company, and in caseitshouM devolve, to be redeemed and repossessed with twenty guilders per colonie to be paid to this Company, at the Chamber here {Holland), or to their commander there {New Netherland) within a year and six weeks after the same occurs, each at the Chamber where he originally sailed from." This continued without change till 1640, when the revised charter of that year, stated the same tenure more fully, in these words, "the lands remaining allodial, but the juris- diction as of a perpetual hereditary fief, devolvable by death as well to females as to males, and fealty and homage for which is to be rendered to the Company, on each of such occasions with a pair of iron gaunt- lets, redeemable by twenty guilders within a year and six weeks, at the Assembly of the XIX here {in Amstfrdam), or before the Governor there {in New Amsterdam); with this understanding, that in case of division of said fief or jurisdiction, be it high, middle, or low, the parts shall be and remain of the same nature as was originally conferred on the whole, and fealty and homage must be rendered for each part thereof by a pair of iron gauntlets, redeemable by twenty guilders as aforesaid." The Dutch words translated in the above quotation "a i)erpelual hereditary fief," and in the sixth article of the charter of 1629 "a perpetual inheritance," mean more than these English renderings, and ex- press a technicality of the Dutch law which the latter does not convey. It is this. A feud, or fief, (these terms are synonymous) is thus defined in the Dutch law, "an hereditary indivisible use over the immove- able property of another, with a mutual obligation of protection on the one side, and a duty of homage and service on the other." ^ Such a fief, under the law, "was not divisible, except by charter and passed only per capita, or by stipulation in cases of intestacy, to the eldest male amongst the lawful children, or fur- ther descendants, of the last possessor; to males sprung from males, the nearest degree taking prece- dence of one more remote."^ These, the old fiefs of the Fatherland, were termed "recta fenda,'' right fiefs, and were the fiefs referred to in both the New Nether- land charters of "Freedoms and Exemptions" and the above translations of them. As they were indivisible and passed of right to the eldest male representative of the last possessor, and did not depend upon the intestacy of a son, they were termed "undying" fiefs, as opposed to fiefs where the succession might be changed by stipulation at the time of the inves- titure, or afterwards, which last were also hereditary. These "old fiefs" were not transplanted to New Netherland by the charters of Freedoms and Exemp- tions, but the new fiefs created by virtue of those charters had merely the same rights of jurisdiction, hunting, fishing, fowling, and milling, as the old un- 1 This means "political and judicial," the original being badly trans- l.ited. See Art. X, in the charter of 1629, where the language, " is aa well in the political as the judicial government." s Herbert's Orotius, £30, ? I. sjbid. THE OKIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 63 dying ones. In all other respects they were entirely different. The jurisdiction of the Patroons and their feignorial rights were held "as" of these undying fiefs, that is in the same manner as jurisdiction and seignorial rights were held under them. But the land itself, together with the produce, superficies, minerals, rivers and fountains thereof, was held by a very different tenure. That tenure was allodial, which means, not feudal, independent of a lord paramount. "The lands remaining allodial but the jurisdiction as of a perpetual (undying) hereditary fief" is the lan- guage of the charter of 1640. Then follows this radical change from the old fiefs, " devolvable by death as well to females as males," to women as well as to men, is the literal translation of the original words. Thus in New Netherland the right of suc- cession was extended to at least double the number of persons, that it was under the old fiefs of the Father- land. Annexed to this right, was the provision that upon each person succeeding to the inheritance of the Patroonship, fealty and homage were "to be rendered on each of such occasions to the Company with a pair of iron gauntlets, redeemable by twenty guilders within a year and six months, at the Assembly of the XIX. here [Amsterdam), or before the Governor there {New Amsterdam)." This was simply a method adopted for the acknowledgment by the Patroons of the ])olitical supremacy of the West India Company, as the ultimate and paramount government and source of title in New Netherland ; a method bor- rowed from the old feudal manner in which the tenant, or vassal, acknowledged the holding of his lands from a lord paramount, who was in his turn thereby obliged to protect him, and which was called tenure by knight-service. Nothing of the latter ever existed in New Netherland. Except this political acknowledgment of the West India Company to be what we now call "the State," the Patroonships were held as hereditary allodial lauds, which the Patroons could divide in parts and sell in fee at their pleasure; but what they did not sell in fee, descended to the next heir, whether man or woman, unless devised by will otherwise. This power of devising by will was earnestly desired and contended for by the Patroons. The seventh article of the charter of 1629 says, "There shall likewise be granted to all Patroons who shall desire the same, venia tcstandi, or liberty to dispose of their aforesaid heritage by testament." " All Patroons and feudatories {/undatories were the holders of any part of the fief) shall, on requesting it, be granted " Venia Testandi, or the power to dispose of, or bequeath his fief by Will," is the language of that of 1640. This power alone, as it insured at some time or other the dividing up of all large fipfs, was sufficient to prevent the New Netherland fiefs from ever becoming dangerous, or the source of a great, continued, and oppressive aristocracy. The "feudal system" of Europe, as such, never existed in New Netherland. That system however is the basis of the land titles of every civilized country of Europe at this hour, as it was at the discovery of the New World; and, as derived from the various countries of Europe which colonized America, is now the basis of those of the various States of the American Republic. The system of tenure intro- duced into New York by the Dutch, was divested of all burdensome attributes — the nova feuda, the new fiefs, by which all the land was there held were purely allodial, with full right in the Patroons to sell in fee in whole or in part, and to devise it in whole or in part by will, free of all charges and incum- brances, except the mere political acknowledgment of the West India Company as the ultimate paramount source of all title, the State. It was the most liberal land system, introduced upon the American Con- tinent; far more so than the English system as intro- duced into the English Colonies, and the full feudal system, introduced into the American Colonies of France, Spain, and Portugal. It certainly did not "scatter" in New Netherland "the seeds of servitude- slavery, and aristocracy."' There were no "serfs" in the feudal sense, either in the Dutch republic or its colony of New Netherland. Slavery was, and had been, the universal, acknowledged, source of labor, the result of conquest originally, for centuries be- fore, and at that time — the 17th century- — all over the world. And equally in all countries of civilization was the division of society into classes of diverse grades, and the existence of an aristocracy, the only one known, established, and existing; and every State and government then in being was based upon it. How futile then is the idea, that to these New Netherland charters of Freedoms and Exemptions is owing the introducing of all these institutions into what is now the State of New York. Had neither of these charters ever existed the "seeds" of all three of these institutions would have found their way thither because they were simply the universal in- stitutions of the highest human civilization at that era. The reason why it was possible for the liberal fiefs of New Netherland to be created, was the nature of the investiture required to establish the Patroons in their rights, the seizin or delivery of possession to them established by the charters. This in the old fiefs, and under the feudal system, in Europe gen- erally, was by an act of the lord upon receiving the oath of fealty and the homage of the tenant or vassal, at w^hich time the latter also presented the lord with a fine, that is, a gift of some small article or thing as a token of his fidelity. In the New Netherland fiefs by virtue of the charters this whole matter was changed. The delivery of the grant of the fief by the Governor and Council itself was the livery of seizin, or investiture, of the possession in the Patroon. > Moulton iu his Hiat. of N. Y., 3S7-8. 64 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. And at that time the latter took the oath of alle- giance which was the " fealty," to the Company, and did his " homage," which was simply by holding up his hands in the presence of some other tenant, o^ the Company or Patroon, verbally acknowledging the Company as the ultimate possessor of the land, or as we should say, the State, requesting the Governor to invest him with the possession, and at the same time, presenting to him the pair of iron gauntlets (the hand armor of a coat of mail), or twenty guilders in money. They were thus under the Dutch law nova feuda, new fiefs, as distinguished from the old fiefs described before; and the Company as the ultimate possessor of the land by its Governor's grant could, and did) make the new investiture that has been described. If a Patroon divided his patroonship, the same jurisdic- tion attached to each part, and the same kind of in- vestiture, had to be made for each part, as was pro- vided for the whole patroonship in the origiilal grant. The numerous provisioiis of these charters relating to the trade, and other commercial privileges, granted to the Patroons do not require to be here considered. Neither do a few other provisions of a general nature. The twenty-sixth article of the charter of 1629 as has been mentioned, provided that every one who "shall settle any colonic out of the limits of Manhat- ten Island, shall be obliged to satisfy the Indians for the land they shall settle upon," thus absolutely ])rotecting the natives in the possession of their territories. The twenty-ninth article, in accordance with the political economy of Europe at that day, which taught that colonies should be kept as markets for the ])roduttions of the mother countiics, ])rohibited all manufactures in New Netherland on pain of banish- ment. The thirtieth article of that of 1629, provided " that the company will use their endeavours to supply the colonists with as many blacks as they con- veniently can, on the conditions hereafter to be made ; in such manner, however, that they shall not be bound to do it for a longer time than they shall think proper." The charter of 1640, says, "The company shall exert itself to provide the patroons aud colonists, on their order, with as many blacks as possible, without however being further or longer obligated thereto than shall be agreeable." These pro- visions were simply to furnish the cheapest labor then known, and were in accordance with the manner and methods of colonizing at that day, and the views of that era, as to labor. It was a similar provision to those put in contracts in our day and generation, for build- ing railroads, canals, mines, and other enterprises, by syndicates and construction companies, and corpora- tions, by which, so many hundreds, or thousands, of laborers, black, yellow, or white, are to be furnished at such a price for such wages. Were slavery not now abolished everywhere except in the Spanish Colonies, these contracts now would call for slaves as the cheapest kind of labor. But one other subject of these charters remains to be considered, and that is the religion they estab- lished in New Netherland. All the charters were approved and enacted as laws by the West India Company, and the States-General ; the sovereign power of the Seven Provinces of the United Netherlands. The twenty-seveuth article of the charter of 1629 is in these words, — " The Patroons and Colonists shall in particular and in the speediest manner, endeavour to find out ways and means whereby they may sup- port a minister and school-master, that thus the service of God and Zeal for religion may not grow cool, and be neglected among them ; and that they do for the first, procure a comforter of the sick there." The charter of 1640 speaks much more strongly and directly : — " And no other Religion shall be publicly admitted in New Netherland except the Reformed, as it is at present preached and practiced in the United Netherlands ; and for this purpose the company shall provide and maintain good and suitable preachers, school-masters and comforters of the sick." By these provisions of the two charters was the Reformed Church of the Netherlands, the national established church of the Dutch Republic, made the established church of New Netherland. And as such it remained until the seizure of the province by the English in 1664. It was re-established at the recapture by the Dutch, nine years later, and only ceased as " the Establishment" |on the surrender of the province to Sir Edmund Andros, for the King of England, pursuant to the treaty of Westminister, on the tenth of Novem- ber 1674. On this occasion the Dutch Governor, Colve, sent certain "articles " to Andros to which he required answers before surrendering, " for the satis- faction of the Dutch Government and for the greater tranquillity, of the good People of this Province." These related mainly to the settlement of debts, the validity of judgments during the Dutch administra- tion, the maintenance of the titles of the owners ot landed property to its possession, and the position of the established church. Andros directed Mathias Nicolls, the former secretary under the English, to confer in person with Colve on these subjects. Nicolls satisfied Colve that Andros would give satisfactory answers as soon as he assumed the government, and this assurance was fully carried out. The article relating to the Church is in these words : — " that the inhabitants of the Dutch nation may be allowed to retain their customary Church privileges in Divine Service and Church discipline." * This was granted, and with the Province of New Netherland fell for- ever the " Establishment " of the Dutch Church. But from that day to this, that great and ven- erable Church has continued in the enjoyment of its creed, privileges, and property, as fully and as freely 1 II Brod., 170. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. G5 as it did, while having the power of the Province Government at its back to enforce its support and prohibit all doctrines it did not approve. And how strong this i)Ower wiis, its dealings with the Lutherans, and with the Quakers in Governor Stuy vesaut's time, fully attest. At the beginning the maintenance of the Church though undertaken by the West India Company, was, under the charter of 1629, devolved by it upon the Patroons and Free Colonists ; but under that of 1640, and during the entire Dutch dominion afterward, it was placed upon the Province Goverument, as the representative, or rather agent, of the West India Company, without however relieving the Patroons and Colonists from their obligations in regard to it. If they were in default, the Company itself was to maintain " the Established Church " through its Provincial Government from its own revenues. Be- fore the charter of 1629 the Company undertook the support of the church. This appears from a letter of the Eev. Jonas Michaelius, the first clergyman of the Dutch Church in New Nether- land to a brother clergyman at Amsterdam, the Rev. Adrianus Smoutius, dated August 11, 1628, which was discovered and first printed, only in 1858, in a periodical of Amsterdam by Mr. J. J. Bodel Nijenhuis of that city, and subsequently translated and sent to the late Dr. Edmund B. O'Callaghan then of Albany, the author of the " History of New Netherland," by the late Henry C. Murphy, then United States Minister at the Hague. The second volume of the "Holland Documents" translated and edited for the State by Dr. O'Callaghan, was, when the letter arrived, j ust printed, but not bound nor published, and in it, as an appendix, that learned editor inserted Mr. Murphy's translation of this letter. Michaelius sailed from Holland, January 24th, 1628, and arrived at the "Island of Man- hatas," as he calls it, on the 7th of the succeed- ing April, and wrote the letter the following August- In it he says, " In my opinion, it is very expedient that the Lords Managers of this place [the Amsterdam Chamber of the West Indian Company) should furnish plain and precise instructions to their Governors that they may distinctly know how to regulate themselves in all difficult occurrences and events in public matter ; and at the same time that I should have all such Acta Synodalia, as are adopted in the Synods of Holland, both the special ones relating to this region' and those which are provincial and national, in rela- tion to ecclesiastical points of difficulty, or at least such of them as in the judgment of the Reverend brothers at Amsterdam would be most likely to present themselves to us here." . . . The promise which the Lords Masters of the Company had made me of some acres or surveyed lands for me to make myself a home, instead of a free table which otherwise belonged to me is wholly of no avail. For their honors well know that their are no horses, cowi^ or laborers to be obtained here for money. Every one is short in these particulars and wants more." This letter also proves incidentally, that slavery existed in "the Manhatas" at its date, the year before the enactment of the charter of 1629 which provided for their being furnished by the Company to the Patroons, as stated above, and to which has been so often, and so wrongly ascribed their first introduc- tion in New York. Speaking of his fiimily matters, for his wife had died since his arrival leaving him with "two little daughters," Michaelius writes, "maid- servants are not to be had, at least none whom they advise me to take; and the Angola slaves are thievish, lazy and useless trash." Evidently slaves had been by no means lately introduced in "the Manhatas " in 1628. The Canon law and the Roman law came into Hol- land together, and that country was governed by both until the Reformation. Then the former was over- thrown, and the law of the Reformed Church of Hol- land promulgated in 1521, and confirmed in 1612, went into operation, but the Roman civil law remained as before the law of the land. Under the law of the Reformed Church of Holland, matters ecclesiastical come first before the Consistory, then before the Assembly, and finally before the Synod. There being no Synod in New Netherland, the care of the church there was entrusted to the Assembly or classis of Amsterdam, by whom the Dutch clergymen were approved and ordained, at the request, or with the assent, of the West India Company at Amsterdam. ' Except when as a matter of mere charity on their being driven from New England, the English settlers of the Congregational belief w'ere granted freedom of con- scienceand to worship in their own way, and to choose their own civil officers,^ people of other denominations were not allowed to hold ofiice.' This was because the Reformed Religion in accordance with the doc- trine of the Synod of Dort was the Established Re- ligion of New Netherland, and the magistrates were bound to maintain it against all sectaries, and there- fore they must have belonged, or been friendly, to that faith.* Such were the provisions of the charters of Freedoms of Exemptions as to tenure of lands and the rights, powers and privileges of the Patroons, and the Masters or Free Colonists, of New Netherland, and the farm people, or boers, they brought over to cultivate the soil ; and as to the Church. The total number of land grants of all kinds, from a Patroonship, to a single lot in Manhattan Island, issued by the Dutch Provincial Government from 1 Laws of N. N., v. > See charter of Hempstead graated by Governor Kieft, in 1G44. Laws N.JJ., 42. » Ibid, 479. * On Marcli 17, 1064, Stuyvesant and hi» conncil passed an ordinance, tiiat aU ecliool-masters sliould appear witli their Kchool-ohildren every Wediieediiy afternoon in tlie chnrcli. tliat they might be catechised by the Miniaters and Elders. Laws of N. N., 4G1. 66 HISTOEY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. 1630 to 1634, as far complete as the Books of Patents and Town records now admit was 638, as shown by the statement of O'Callaghan api^ended to the second volume of his history. It is not absolutely correct, but is suflSciently so as a very fair approximation. The territories and rights of the original Patroonships on both sides of the Hudson River, with but two exceptions, were subsequently on account of the diffi- culties of their owners, with the West India Company, and the obstacles they met with in settling their lands, subsequently bought back by the Company. Thus they became again part and parcel of the public domain, and as such were retransported and regranted to vari- ous individuals, by the Director and Council. That of New Amstel on the Delaware, was finally conceded to the city of Amsterdam in Holland, as late as 1656, and that city took upon itself the settlement and colonization of that Patroonship. The two exceptions to the re-purchase of the New York Patroonships, were those of Rensselaers-wyck and Colen-Donck, both of which continued in the possession of their Patroons. Space will not permit of even a brief account of the former, which, changed in 1705 to an English Manor, has continued to our own days, striking and interesting as it is. The latter, the only Patroonship established in West- chester County, will now be described. 6 The Patroonship of Colen-Donck. ( Yonkers.) In that portion of New Netherland which now constitutes the county of Westchester there existed under the Dutch dominion but one Patroonship. It was called Colen-Donck, in English "Donck's Col- ony," from the name of its Patroon, Adriaen van der Donck, to whom it was granted by Director Kieft and his Council in the year 1646.^ It was granted as the sole property of one of the most noted and intelligent of the leading men of New Netherland. Public aftairs in which its Patroon was engaged almost immediately after it was granted, and his necessary absence in Holland, retarded its successful development. His death following shortly after his return, and its sale under the power he obtained to dispose of it by will, practically ter- minated it after an existence of only twenty years. Adriaen van der Donck, styled by the Director and Council of New Netherland in a summons to the Rev. Everardus Bogardus, dated the second of Janu- ary, 1646. "the Yoncker was an educated Dutch gentleman, a native of Breda,' a graduate of the Uni- versity of Leyden, and a doctor of both the civil, and the canon, law, " utriusque juris," as that degree was then expressed in Latin. He came to America I II. O'Cal., 384 ; I. Brod., 420. 2 XIV. Col. Hist., 70. 3 1. Col. Hist., 477. in the autumn of 1641, in the service of Kiliaen van Rensselaer, the first Patroon of Rensselaersw3'ck, having been appointed in the early part of that year by that gentleman Schout-Fiscaal of the Patroonship of that name. This office, which, as shown before, combined the duties of a Sherifi' and an Attorney- General, was a most important one, and brought him into close connection with the other officers, and the tenants, of Rensselaerswyck ; the rights and interests of all parties being in many particulars subject to his official action. His first instructions from the Patroon were dated July 18, 1641, and his first account, still existing in the books of that colonic, begins on the 9th of September following.* The above mention of van der Donck as " the -Yoncker " is the earliest mention of that title as applied to him that I have found. As it is used in referring to a matter which oc- curred in 1645, it is clear that he was so called and known four years only after his arrival in America. The term is simply a corruption of " Jonkheer," son of a gentleman.^ It is of interest, for, from this title so given to him who became in the succeeding year, 1646, the Patroon of Colen-Donck, is derived the name which that Patroonship, in common parlance, ever afterwards bore, and which is to-day perpetuated in the corporate name of the beautiful city which is em- braced within its limits — Yonkers. Van der Donck was the first lawyer in New Nether- land, and of course in that part of it now New York. Lubbertus van Dincklagen, who was appointed Schout-Fiscaal and Vice Director of New Nether- land, 5th May, 1645, also a doctor of civil and canon law, was the second, and Dirk {Richard) van Schel- luyne, who was also the first notary, commissioned 8th May, 1650, was the third. These first lawyers are mentioned here because their names are found appended to so very many of the early deeds, and public and private documents, of the earliest part of the Dutch dominion in New York. Prior to leaving Amsterdam, van der Donck, probably as part of the terms between them, received from Kiliaen von Rensselaer, a lease of the westerly half of the first island on the west side of the Hud- son below Albany then called Welysburgh, from van Wely, a relative of the Patroon. Later it was styled, "Castle Island," because upon its southern end was built the first fortified trading house erected by Cor- stiaensen under the charter of "The United New Netherland Company," of 14th October, 1614, and called Fort Nassau, which three years later, in 1617, was destroyed by a freshet. Subsequently, and till this day, from its proprietors, it was, and still is, known as Rensselaers Island. Here van der Donck erected a house and dwelt. In 1643 difficulties between him and Arendt von Curler, or Corlaer, the Patroon's commissary, occurred, and van der Donck, determin- ing to leave his position, undertook to arrange for the «I. 0'Cal„327. 61. Brod. 421. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 07 planting of a "Colonic" at "Katskill," of Avhich he himself was to be the Patroon. This was a violation of the sixth and twenty-sixth articles of the charter of Freedoms and Exemptions of 1629, and the Patroon of Rensselaerswyck, on the 10th September, 1643, sent written orders to van Curler, to see that van der Donck desisted at once, being his "sworn officer," and if he did not, that he should " be degraded from his office and left on his bowerie to complete his con- tracted lease without allowing him to dej^art." This effectually put an end to the project of the Katskill Colonie, van der Donck continued to perform his duties, and matters grew much easier with van Curler. On the 18th of January, 1646, van der Donck's house burned down, at which very time he was negotiating for a sale of his lease to one Michael Jansen, to which, as the Patroon's Commissary, van Curler had to assent. A new quarrel at once arose, as to Avhether the loss should fall on the Patroon as van der Donck claimed, or on the latter as van Curler insisted. The matter was tinallv referred to the Patroon in Holland van der Donck left the island, and lived in a hut near Fort Orange, till spring, and then came down to New Amsterdam.' In the previous year, 164-5, he had been of great assistance to Director Kieft in advancing the requisite funds, and settling the terms of peace with the Indians, which closed the wicked war that Kieft had wantonly begun two or three years before, and which proved so disastrous to New Netherland.^ The Patroon of Rensselaers- wyck, died at Amsterdam later in 1646, and with his death the connection of van der Donck with that Patroonship ceased, Nicolas Coorn succeeding him in his office by the appointment of the executors of the late Patroon, Johannes van Wely and Wouter van Twiller. Van der Donck still desiring to become a Patroon, immediately occupied himself, on returning to New Amsterdam, in looking for a proper location. He finally selected tlie lower portion of what is now the county of Westchester and northern part of the city of New York, between the rivers Hudson and Har- lem, on the west and south, and the Bronx on the east. A choice which eminently proved his good taste and sound judgment. The Indian name for this region was Keskeskick, and the Indian title to it was extinguished by its sale to the West India Com- pany by its Indian owners on the third of August, 1639, in these words, " This day, date as below, ap- peared before meCoruelis van Tienhoven, Secretary in New Netlierland, Tequeemet, Rechgawac, Pachamiens, owners of Keskeskick, who in presence of the under- signed witnesses voluntarily and deliberately declare, that in consideration of a certain lot of merchandise, which they acknowledge to have received and accepted 1 I .O'Call , N. N., 33\ 3.-?8, .■M5, 340 ; I. Brod., 419, 420. ! Von (ier Djuck'8 New Netherland in I. N.Y. Hist. Soc. Coll., 2d Series- 127 anJiei. before the passing of this act, they have transferred, ceded, conveyed, and made over, as a true and lawful freehold, as they herewith transfer, cede, convey, and make over, to, and for the benefit of, the General Incorporated West India Company, a piece of land, situate opposite to the flat on the Island of Manhat- tan, called Keskeskick, stretching lengthwise along the Kil, which runs behind the Island of Manhattan mostly cast and west, and beginning at the head of the said Kil and running to opposite of the high hill by the flat, namely by the Great Kil, with all right, titles, &c., &c. Done at Fort Amsterdam, the 3d of August, 1639. cornelis van der hoylen, David Pietersen de Vries, as witnesses, in my presence, CORNELIS VAN TiENHOVEN, Secretary. This instrument is recorded in Book G, G, of Patents page 30, in the Secretary of State's Office in Albany.^ By it was vested in the West India Com- pany the right of soil and possession of the Indians in the tract described. It will be noticed that it bears no marks of the Indians as signatories, but is only signed by the witnesses and the Secretary of the Province, differing in this respect from the Indian Deeds of much later dates, and especially from those executed under the English rule. This was strictly in accord- ance with the Dutch Provincial " Ordinance," or law, enacted by the Director and Council of New Nether- land the year before the date of this deed, which, as it is not generally known, is in full as follows ; — - "The Free people" [those not Patroon s, nor boera or farm laborers) " having by petition requested Patents of the Lands which they are at present cul- tivating, the prayer of the Petitioners is granted, on condition that at the expiration of Ten years after entering upon their Plantation, they shall pay yearly to the Company the Tenth of all crops which God the Lord shall grant to the field; also from this time forth, one couple of capons for a house and lot." This ordinance of the Director and Council was passed on the 24th June, 1638.* On the 19th of the following August another ordi- nance was passed by the same high authority, in which occurs this clause providing that all legal documents, shall be drawn up by the Secretary of the Province ; — Likewise, that, from now henceforward, no instruments, whether contracts, obligations, leases, or Bills of Sale, or such like writings of what nature soever they be, and concerning which any dispute 3 It is also printed in XIII. Col. Hist., < Laws N. N., 10. This law was the origin of the "four fat fowls" claxise of the manorial leases in New York. The " tenths " or titlies were simply a form of rental, the recompense to the Comi)an)' and the patroous for their outlay and expense in settling their lands. G8 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. may arise, shall be held valid by the Director and Council, unless tliey shall be written by the Secretary of this place. Let every one take warning and save himself from damage. This done and published iu Fort Amsterdam this 19th of August, 1638." ^ The witnesses to the above instrument were well known men of mark at that day. The name of the first correctly entered should have been Cornells van der Hoyden, or van der Huyghens, as the name was truly spelled. He was, on July 13th, 1639, just pre- vious to the date of this deed, appointed the Schout- Fiscaal, or Sheriff and Attorney-General, of the Prov- ince, served for several years, and was drowned on the voyage to Holland in 1647 with Governor Kieft. David Pietersen de Vries was the famous navigator, the author of the " Journal notes of several voyages in Europe, Africa, Asia and America," one of the earliest and most authentic writers on New Netherland, He was also a Patroon of Swanandael on the Dela- ware, of another Patroonship upon Staten Island, and in the words of Brodhead, was " frank, honest, relig- ious, and a sincere advocate of the true interests of New Netherland." Cornelis Tienhoven the Secretary, so long in office under Kieft and Stuyvesant, and often their envoy to the different English Colonies, and active in other public positions in New Amsterdam is so well known as to need no further mention. Van der Donck began his settlement on the banks of the Neperhaem, or, as more lately termed, the Neperan near its confluence with the Hudson, erect- ing a saw mill, and other improvements incident to such an enterprise, at that place. From this mill the stream derived its Dutch name of Saeg-Kill, or Saw- Kill, and the English one, by which it continues to be known, the " Saw-Mill River." For his own residence and home plantation, he selected the southern end of the beautiful peninsula, or tide island as it really was, and the meadows immediatelyabout it, which the Indi- ans called Papirinemen, directly opposite the north- ernmost extremity of Manhattan Island, almost sur- rounded by the waters of the same name, connecting the Spyt-den-Duyvel Creek, on the west, with the Great Kill, or Harlem River on the east ; and upon which afterward was erected the first bridge connect- ing Manhattan Island with the mainland of West- chester County, then, and to this day called Kings- bridge. ^ He also cultivated the ancient corn grounds of the former Indian owners, now the beautiful flat surrounding the old " Cortlandt House" soon to be the parade-ground of the new "Van Cortlandt Park ; " that estate which has continued in the family for nearly two centuries, liaving now been wisely acquired by the City of New York for a grand sub- urban park. Becoming engaged, as a leader, in the disputes 1 Laws N. N., 17. 2 Vol. I. 381, note. 3 Vau der Djuck's Letter. Biker's Harlem, 1G3. between the people of New Amsterdam and Governor Stuyvesant as the representative of the West India Company, he could not give his Patroonship the attention it needed. Three years after the grant to him of Colen-Donck by Governor Kieft, the troubles with Stuyvestant came to a head. The Commonalty of the " Province of New Netherland," drew up by a committee, a Petition to the States-General for a redress of their grievances, dated July 26th, 1649; the draughtsman, and first signer, of which was Adriaen van der Donck. This Petition, with a full explanation in the form of notes, also by van der Donck, and signed by him and the others of the com- mittee was transmitted to Holland.* Two days later on the 28th of July, was also signed the famous "Remonstrance," or " Vertoogh" of van der Donck, giving a long, detailed, history of the discovery, pro- ductions, settlement, and alleged misgovernment of the New Netherland by the ofiicei"s of the West India Company. Van der Donck, Jacob van Couwenhoven, and Jan Everts Bout, were appointed by the Commonalty a delegation to proceed to Holland and lay these docu- ments before the States-General and the West India Company and ask for a redress of what they deemed oppression. On the 12th of the succeeding August, von Dincklagen the Vice-Director under Stuyvesant, but not favored by him, sent a letter to the States- General, in which he says, " whereas the Condition of that most fertile New Netherland is seriously impair- ed by the war,^ and the Commonalty hath resolved on a delegation of three of the Nine Selectmen in order that your High Mightinesses may obtain full and thorough information on every point, [and] I have not been able to dissuade them therefrom. I cannot but say they intend what is right. These persons are thoroughly conversant with the situation of the coun- try. I hope your High Mightinesses will be pleased thereby and extend to them a favorable audience, and give them despatch as soon as your High Mighti- nesses' more weighty affairs will permit, as the people are very anxious." * These papers were received on the 13th of October, 1649, by the States-General from the delegates, and referred to a special committee to examine and report upon them. On the 31st of January, 1650, the com- mittee reported adversely to the Petitioners, answering their documents article by article, and using strong language.' The delegates replied by a further short petition on the 7th of February following, which was also referred to a special committee.* Other com- munications were subsequently received and referred. Finally their committee reported to the States-Gen- eral a long, detailed, and very full "Provisional Order respecting the Government, Preservation and Peo- 1 1. Col. Hist., 259, 270. = Kieft's late war with the Indians is here referred to. 61. Col. Hist., 319. ■I Col. Hist., 338, etc. sjijid., 346. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. G9 pling of New Netherland on April 11, 1050." It con- tHined twenty-one sections materially modifying the action of the West India Company, — and one of which instructed Stnyvesant to return to Holland.' The Company ojiposied its adoption, and it was tem])o- rarily laid over.' A new modification of the Free- doms and Exemptions was also. adopted on the 24th Jlay, 1650, which however did not change the prin- ciples of those of 1629, and 1640, but referred chiefly to minor details. This was the last legislative action of the States-General relative to the colonization of New Netherland.-' Van der Donck endeavoured to aid his "Colonic," and New Netherland gen- erally, in the matter of population. On the 11th of March, 1650, he and the other delegates, concluded a contract " to charter a suitable fly boat of two hundred lasts, and therein to go to sea on the 1st of June next, and convey to New Netherland the number of two hundred passengers, of which one hundred are to be farmers and farm servants, and the remaining one hundred such as the Amsterdam Chamber is accustomed to send over, conversant with agriculture, and to furnish them with supplies for the voyage," on condition that the con- tractors should be allowed four thousand guilders from the export duties on New Netherland freights, "to pay present expenses," and the further sum of seven thousand guilders from the peltry duties at New Amsterdam ; and in case of failure by the con- tractors they were to restore the four thousand guil- ders, aud forfeit, besides, two thousand guilders more of their own funds.* Van Couwenhoven and Bout returned to New Netherland with a copy of the "Provisional Order," arriving there on the 28th of June,^ leaving van der Donck in Holland to complete the business of the delegation, and return when the redress was actually voted. Failing to obtain action, van der Donck, on the 14th January, 1651, presented the States-General, with a further petition "again praying that a speedy and necessary redress may be concluded on, in regard to the affairs of New Netherland." Stuyvesant declined to obey the " Provisional order," except in some minor matters, and opposed it by strong despatches to the company, while his Secre- tary van Tienhoven was already in Holland fighting van der Donck strenuously before the authorities there. On the 10th of February, 1652, nothing having been finally determined, still another rc])resentation of the contumacy of Stuyvesant, and the continued bad state of New Netherland, and the necessity for an act of redress of their grievances was made by van der Donck. It thus concludes, — " the said delegate of the Commonalty of New Netherland again humbly prays and requests your High Mightinesses to be 1 1. Col. Hist., 387. 2 Ibid., 303. Mbid., 401. *l. Col. Uist., 379. 'I. Colonial HlBt., 447. ))leased to dispose favorably of the aforesaid, in order that he, the delegate, may leave by the first ship this spring on his return for New Netherland."" With this paper van der Donck laid before the States-General a voluminous mass of extracts of let- ters and other documents received chiefly in the year 1051, by him from New Netherland, detailing the difliculties there.' After a reference of these papers to the different chambers of the West India Company and considering their various reports thereon, which occupied many months, the States-General adopted and sent the following recall to Stuyvesant, " Honor- able &c. We have, in view of the public service con- sidered it necessary to require you, on sight hereof, to repair hither in order to furnish us circumstantial and pertinent information, as to the true and actual con- dition of the country and aff"airs; and also of the boundary line between the English and the Dutch there. Done 27th April 1052." - The very day before, on the 26th of April, at his own request pursuant to the charter of Freedoms and Exemptions, the States-General granted to van der Donck, by patent under seal, the " venia testandi," or right to dispose by will as Patroon, "of the Colonic Nepperhaein by him called Colem Donck, situate in New Netherland."" He now thought everything was completed and that he should soon be again on the banks of the Hudson. He embarked his goods and everything in the way of supplies for his "Colonic," in a vessel then anchored in the Texel, aud on the 13th of May 1652 applied to the States-General for their formal permit to return home, which was requisite by a resolution of that body of the 14th of the preceding March. But he was doomed to disappointment. The Amsterdam chamber supported their officers, and were dis[)leased at van der Donck, and the delegation for laying all thoir matters before the States-General instead of before themselves, thereby forcing the chamber to bring its own action in New Netherland before the "Lords of Holland," as the States-General were termed. And it had influence enough among them to annoy van der Donck in every way. His request was merely referred to a committee "to examine." But on the 24th of May he sent in along and sharp, but respectful, memorial, protesting against their inaction. In this, he says, "that proposing to depart by your High Mightinesses consent, with his wife, mother, sister, brother, servants, maids, and in that design had packed and shipped all his implements and goods," but he understood "that the Hon.*"^ Directors at Amsterdam had for- bidilen all skippers to receive him, or his, even though exhibiting your High Jlightinesses express orders and consent," * * * " by which he must, without any form of procedure, or anything resembling thereto, remain separated from his wife, mother, sis- 6 1. Col. Hist., 438. 'I. Col. Hist., 444-401. 81. Col. Hiet., 472. 91. Col. Hist., 470. 70 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. ter, brother, servants, maids, family connexions, from two good friends, from his merchandise, his own necessary goods, furniture, and also from his real estate in New Netherland." ' But this also was merely referred to the various chambers " for their information."'- Nothing was done, and ou the 5th of August, 1652, he again solicited permission to depart. ' He was again denied, and this, too, in spite of his showing that his affairs were going to ruin, and the cruelty of separating him iVom his wife and family. The family therefore were obliged to sail without him, and he returned to the Hague.* To this persecution aud vindictiveness of his oppo- nents, however, we are indebted for the most valuable account of New Netherland written by any one who had then been a resident there. He seems to have begun this work immediately upon his return to the Hague and it was probably finished in the course of the ensuing winter. In May he applied for a copy- right, which after an examination of the book both by the Chamber of Amsterdam, and a Committee of the States-General, was granted by the latter body on the 24th of May, 1753. The correspondence on this subject between these bodies, shows that a copy of this little book was sent by the former to the latter on the 2d of May, and referred to a committee " to inspect, examine, and report thereon."^ It must therefore have been printed at that time, though no copy of that date is now known to exist. This is the more probable from the fact, that van der Donck was at length permitted to depart, and returned to New Netherland in the sum- mer of 1753.^ As we know that he intended to write an addition to this work in order to make it complete as a history, aud obtained an order from the West India Company, in the shape of a letter from it to Stuyvesant, to permit him to examine the papers and records in the Secretary's office of the Province, for that purpose, it may be, that though printed, it was not published in 1(553. Stuyvesant on his return refused him access to the records, and thus defeated his plan, and he then, in all probability, consented to the publication of what had already been printed in Holland. He died in 1G55, about two years after his return to America," and in the same year the first edition of his work that we now have, was issued in Amsterdam, with a view of New Amsterdam inserted.* A second edition was issued in 1G56, also in Amsterdam, without the view, but containing a map of New Netherland. This book was entitled! "Beschryvin I. van Niew Nederlandt," or, " A Desci'iption of New Netherland" (such as it now is) Comprehending the nature, character, situation and Fruitfulness of 1 1. Col. Hist., 476. =1. Col. Hist., 476, 478. 3 Ibid., 485. The original transport is in Latin, and an English translation is in XIV. Col. Hist., 38 ; I. O'Call, 237 ; and Appendix, 4J7 and 428. 2 11. Col. Hist., 93. 3 The Indian name of Spyt-Uen-fujvel Creek. *Now Kiugsbridge. sion and authority, given unto me by his Royal High- ness the Duke of York, I have thought fit to give, ratify, confirm, and grant, and by these presents do give, ratify, confirm, and grant, unto the said Hugh O'Neale and Mary his wife, their heirs and assigns, all the afore mentioned tract or parcel of lands called Nepperhaem, together with all woods, marshes, meadows, pastures, waters, lakes, creeks, rivulets fishing, hunting and fowling, and all other profits, commodities and emoluments to the said tract of land belonging, with their, and every of their appurten- ances, and of every part and parcel thereof, (o have and to hold the said tract of land and premises, with all and singular their appurtenances, to the said Hugh O'Neale and Mary his wife, their heirs and assigues to the proper use and behoofe of the said Hugh O'Neale and Mary his wife, their heires and assignes forever, he, she, or they, or any of them, ren- dering and paying such acknowledgment, and duties, as are, or shall be, constituted and ordayned by his Royal Highness the Duke of York, and his heirs, or such governor, or governors, as shall from time to time be appointed and set over them within this province. That, if at any time hereafter, his Royal Highness, his heirs, successors, or assigns, shall think fit to make use of any timber for shipping, or for erecting or repairing of forts within this government, liberty is reserved for such uses and purposes to cut any sort of timber upon any unplanted grounds, on the said tract of land, to make docks, harbours, wharfes, houses, or any other conveniences relating thereunto, and also to make use of any rivers or rivuletts, and inlets of water, for the purposes afore- said, as fully and free as if no such patent had been granted. Given under my hand and seal at Fort James, New York, on the Island of Manhattan, the eighth day of October, in the eighteenth year of the reign of our sovereign Lord, Charles the Second, by the grace of God, of England, France, and Ireland, King, defender of the Faith, &c., &c., in the year of om- Lord God, 1666." ^ The acknowledgment by the Indians referred to in the foregoing deed, thus appears under date of September 21st, 1668, in Book of Deeds III., at Albany, page 42 : "This day came Hugh O'Neale and Mary his wife (who in right of her former husband laid claime to a cert" parcele of land upon the Maine not farre from Westchester, commonly called the Younckers land), who bro't severall Indyans before the gov" to acknowledge the purchase of said lands by van der Donck commonly called ye Youncker. The said Indyans declared y'^ bounds of the sd. lands to be from a place called by them Macackassin at y" north so to run to Neperan and to y" Kill Soro-quappock, then to Muskota and Papperinemain to the south. 5 Recorded in Sec. of State's office, .\lba ny 72 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. and crosse the country to eastward by Bronckx his Ryver and Land. The Indyan Propyetors name who was cheife of them is Tackareeck living at the Nevisans' who acknowledged the purchase as before described, and that he had received satisfac" for it. — Claes y^ Indyan hav^ interest in a part acknowledged to have sould it, and received satisfact" of van der Donck. All the rest of the Indyans present being seven or eight acknowledged to have rec* full satis- faction." The date of this instrument, 1668, is evidently a cleri- cal error for 1666, as the acknowledgment is recited in NicoU's patent of confirmation which bears day Oc- tober 8th, 1666. From this patent it is clear that no part of the patroonship had been parted with since van der Donck's death in 1655. And from the fact that on the 30th of the same October in the same year in which this patent was granted, only twenty-two days afterward, the first conveyance under it was made by O'Xeale and his wife, it seems evident that it was obtained simply as a confirmation of the original title, and an acknowledgment of its validity, by the New English government, in order to make the sale alluded to. This sale of the tract, on October 30th, 1666, was made to Elias Doughty, of Flushing, Long Island, who was the son of the Rev. Francis Doughty, and a brother of van der Donck's widow, the then wife of Hugh O'Neale, and vested the entire Patroonship in him. Elias Doughty at once began the sale of it in different parcels to different individuals in fee. On the first of March, 1667, four months after he had become its owner Elias Doughty sold to John Arcer, or Archer, as this Dutch name was Anglicised,^ " four score acres of upland and thirty of meadow betwixt Broncx river & y'' watering place at the end of the Island of Manhattans,"^ which four years later^ with some adjoining purchases of lands, was erected in his favor into the Manor of Fordham by Gover- nor Lovelace on the 13th of November, 1771. On June 7th, 1668, Doughty sold to John Heddy * of Westchester a tract of three hundred and twenty acres, now part of the old van Cortlandt estate, re- cently taken for van Cortlandt Park. The next month, on the 6th of July, 1668, Elias Doughty sold to George Tippitt and William Belts another piece of Colen-Donck, thus described : "A parcell of land& meadow to ye Patent to William Betts and George Tippett who are in jiossession of a part of the same land formerly owned by old Youncker van der Donck which runs west to Hudson's river & east to Broncks River, with all the upland from Broncks River south to Westchester Path, & so runs due east and north 1 The Neversink Highlands in New Jei-sey. 2Riker"s Harlem, i'S. 3 Deed Book III., 13S, Albany. The original, a beautiful MS. is in the State Library at Albany. It is ' Ibid., 51-C3. Ibid., 64. printed in II. Col. Hist. 295 ; Bred. II. Col. * Book of Patents, Albany, II. UG-116 ; II. Brwl., l.')3 ; Leamiog aud 2 III. Col. Ilist., 52. ' Spiter's Jti-sey Laws, Ctio. 76 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Hill with the Elyas on Sunday last. * * * * our stay here being only for a little water and our other shipps, which if they come not in time, we must go to our appointed port in Long Island." Three days later, on the 23d of July, the Guinea and Elias arrived at Boston. Nicolls wrote at once to Thomas Willet at Plymouth, and Gov. Winthrop at Hartford, and ap- plied for assistance. On the 29th of July the vessels from "Pascathway" arrived at Boston. Further letters from Nicolls were sent to Winthrop asking for aid, and to Thomas Willets at Plymouth, and direct- ing them to meet the expedition at the west, instead of the east, end of Long Island. A few days later the ships sailed, and i)iloted by New Englanders, came direct to New Utrecht, or Nayack, Bay, now called Gravesend Bay, between the west end of Coney Island and the main, the Guinea arriving on the 25th of August, and the other three vessels three days later, on the 28th. Winthrop with other Connecticut officials, and armed men, from that colony and the east end of Long Island, met them there, as well as Thomas Clarke and John Pynchon, of Boston, with offers of military aid from Massachusetts. On the 8th of the preceding July Thomas Willett had heard, from a young man of the name ofLord, a rumor from Boston, that an expedition had sailed from England to attack New Netherland, and immediately informed Governor Stuyvesant, but subsequently, for some reason, alleged that the troops had disembarked, that Commissioners to settle the boundaries were appointed, and that there was no danger. This put an end to Stuyvesant's anxiety, and he went to Albany to settle a quarrel among the Indians in that neighborhood. He was also lulled into security by the receipt of a despatch from the Directors at Amsterdam tfhat no danger from England need be entertained as the King only wanted to reduce his own colonies to uniformity in church and State.' The truth was, that the Directors of the Company, intently engaged in the public affairs of Holland (it was the period of John de Witt's ascen- dancy and the efforts of the Prince of Orange's party to destroy it) really neglected New Netherland, and their own interests there, giving both such slight at- tention, as not only, disappointed its people, and their own officials, but facilitated, the treacherous action of the English King, and inclined its inhabitants to yield with less resistance and feeling to his military power, than they otherwise would. Of course no real resistance,^ greatly as he desired to make it, could be offered, by Director-General Stuyvesant, and his people ; and after several days negotiations. Articles of Capitulation were definitely settled by a commission, composed of John De Decker, Nicholas Varleth, Samuel Megapolensis, Cornells Steenwyck, Jacques Cousseau, and Oloff Stevens 1 II. O Call., 517. 2 The details of Stuyvesant's action at this crisis are too niinieroue to be given in an esssiy of this kind, and are so generally known, at least in their outlines, as not to need further mention. van Cortlandt, on the part of Director Stuyvesant, and Robert Carr, George Carteret, John Win- throp, Samuel Willys, John Pynchon, {the latter three of Connecticut), and Thomas Clarke {of Mas- sachusetts) on the part of Governor Nicolls, and con- sented to by both. The negotiations took place, and the terms were finally agreed upon, on Saturday, September 6th, 1664, at Gov. Stuyvesant's house in the Bowery. This house, as L have been told by the Hon. Hamilton Fish, now the oldest living descend- ant of Stuyvesant, .stood on what is now the block between 12th and 13th Streets facing the Third Avenue, as that part of the Bowery road is now called, and on the east side of that avenue. The old Stuy- vesant pear tree which stood till within a few years at the north east corner of 13th St. and Third Avenue was one the Governor planted in his garden. Nicolls ratified the articles the same day. The next day was Sunday, during which the Director-General and his Council considered them, and early on the morning of the succeeding day, Mon- day, September 8th, 1664, ratified them. About eleven o'clock of the same morning Stuyvesant marched out of the fort with the honors of war, at the head of the Dutch regulars, about 150 in number, and through Beaver street to the ship "Gideon," in which they were at once embarked for Holland, though she did not sail till some days later. A corporal's guard of the Eng- lish took possession of the fort as the Dutch marched out. " Col. Nicolls's and Sir Robert Carr's compan- ies one hundred and sixty-eight strong, formed into six columns of about thirty men each, next entered New Amsterdam ; whilst Sir George Cartwright oc- cupied with his men the city gates and Town Hall." The volunteers from Connecticut and Long Island, were detained at the ferry at " Brenkelen," " as the citizens dreaded most being plundered by them." Finally the Burgomasters having proclaimed Nicolls Governor, he called Fort Amsterdam "Fort James," and the name of the city and Province he changed to " New York." ^ Thus ended the Dutch dominion in America, and thus forever passed away the great Batavian Province of New Netherland from the Re- public of the United Netherlands. The Articles of Capitulation were twenty-three in number, and never were more favorable terms granted by a superior power. Great prudence on one side was met by great liberality on the other, and Nicolls proved that he was all that his commission as Dep- uty-Governor described him, honest, prudent, able, and fit. It would be foreign to our purpose to discuss these Articles of Capitulation, or as usually termed "Surrender," at length.* Those only which bear upon our subject will be mentioned, viz — the third, eighth, eleventh, twelfth, sixteenth, and twenty-first. They are as follows : — 3 II. O'Call., 536. < They are to be found in II. Col., Hist., 250 ; I. Brod., 762, and in many other historical wurks. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 77 " nr. All people shall still continue free denizens, and shall enjoy their lands, houses, goods, wheresoever they are within this country, and dispose of them as they please. "VIII. The Dutch here shall enjoy the liberty of their consciences in divine worship and church dis- cipline. " XI. The Dutch here shall enjoy their own customs concerning their inheritances. "XII. All publique writings and records, which concern the inheritances of any people, or the regle- ment ^regulation} of the church, or poor, or orphans shall be carefully kept by those in whose hands now they are, and such writings as particularly concern the States-General may at any time be sent to them. "XVI. All inferior civil officers and magistrates shall continue as now they are (if they please) till the customary time of new elections, and then new ones to be chosen by themselves, provided that such new chosen magistrates shall take the oath of allegiance to his majesty of England before they enter upon their office. "XXI. That the town of Manhattans shall choose Deputyes, and those Deputyes shall have free voyces in all publique affaires as much as any other Depu- tyes." Ry the third, eighth, eleventh, and twelfth, all Dutch grants of land under the former laws and or- dinances, of the Province, and under the Roman- Dutch law, were acknowledged as valid, and the possession of them confirmed to their owners, as well as their former power of disposing of them by will, and all legal incidents thereto appertaining. This settled thequestion ofthe holdingof the lands by theirowners, at once, and proved that there would be no confiscation, or other interference with them, and no imposing of any English law of inheritance. The sixteenth article confirmed and continued in their offices all the civil magistrates and officers of every grade in the country, from the highest to the lowest, and provided for the election of their success- ors, under the existing Dutch laws, conditioned only that the new officers, .should take the oath of alle- giance to their new English King. No such oath was wisely demanded ofthe old ones, and the administra- tion of justice, not only in regard to lands, but in all its forms, went on precisely as if no change of govern- ment had taken place. The twenty-first article confirmed to the City of New York, all the civil rights and powers it had un- der its former organization, and under the Assem- blies which had been called, and in which it had been represented, during Stuyvesant's administration. Its lands were preserved to it, and all rights in rela- tion thereto, by the same articles, which preserved the other lands of the province to their respective owners, as well as all the municipal rights, powers, and privileges the city possessed under the Dutch rule. The Eighth article, in connexion with the twelfth, preserved, maintained, and continued, to the Estab- lished Dutch Cliurch all its rights, })rivileges, and im- munities of creed and worship, and guaranteed to it freedom of conscience and church discipline, as well as the continuance of its regulations, as to its own concerns, and to the poor and to orphans, in the same hands, and under the same control, that they had ever been. But these articles did not continue it as the Established Church of the Province, or provide for its maintenance and control as such, by the government, or rather, through the government, as had been the case under the West India Company, and all the Charters of Freedoms and exemptions from the first to the last. They did however continue and guaran- tee to it everything else. Its lands and all its rights of property were guaranteed and continued to it by the same third, eighth, eleventh and twelfth articles, which guaranteed and maintained all the other land- holders of the Province in their rights of possession and property in their realty. In short the Dutch Church was acknowledged in its existence, confirmed in its creed, discipline, and worship, maintained in the possession of its property, and guaranteed in its rights in every respect and in every way. Nothing was altered, nothing abrogated, except its position as the Established Church of New Netherland. That was determined by the fall of the Dutch Province. Both were ended by the surrender to England. The new Province of New York had during its whole ex- istence no connexion officially, with the Dutch Church, or any other church, except "the Church of England as by law established." When the Province was recaptured hy the Dutch on the 8th of August 1673 the Dutch Church was re- established in all her rights, privileges, and powers, as she originally possessed them. And when the sec- ond surrender to the English was made pursuant to the treaty of Westminster in September 1674, all were guaranteed to her again precisely as in 1664, except, of course, her position as an establishment; and she was also permitted to keep up her ecclesiastical con- nexion with, and subjection to, the ecclesiastical bodies of the Established Church of Holland, a con- nexion and dependence which continued unimpaired until the close of the American Revolution more than a century later. The position of the Dutch Church as an Established Church, was the reason why it was so particularly guarded, and provided for, in the Articles of Capitulation of 1664, and again in the special articles of surrender formulated by Governor Colve, and carried into effect by the English Governor Andross, in 1674, no other church being mentioned or referred to in either. And to this circumstance is owing the fact, that it was in consequence of these provisions in both sets of articles, that during the en- tire existence of New York as an English Province, the Dutch Church was ever treated with greater favor than any other church dissenting from the Church of 78 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. England; and that between these two churches a cor- dial relation ever existed, and one which has been maintained down to this day, when both churches are flourishing, each with a name slightly changed, under a new political dominion, to a degree which was im- possible under either of the dominions of old. The change from the Dutch system of government and laws to that of the English, was very gradual in- deed. It was no part of the policy of the Duke of York to make changes other than what might be ab- solutely necessary. All that he insisted upon, at first, was, that he should be acknowledged as Lord Propri- etor of the Province under the Patent from his brother King Charles the 2d, of 1652. The prudence, skill and wisdom of Richard Nicolls, his Deputy Governor, after much objection and opposition, which he completely and gently overcame, effected this; and between the 20th and 25th of October, 1664, hardly five weeks after the surrender, all the former Dutch ofiicials, and nearly three hundred of the male inhabitants of New York, including Stuyvesant, van Cortlandt, van Ruyven, van Rensselaer and Beekman, took the oath of alle- giance to Charles the 2d and the Duke of York, as the lawful Sovereign, and the lawful Lord Proprietor of New York. 8. The English System in the Province of New York under the Duhe of York as Lord Proprietor. From the eighth day of September, 1664, when the Surrender of New Netherland to the English took place, the right of soil, the right of domain, the right of jurisdiction, and the source of power, in the Prov- ince of New York, was vested, and acknowledged to be vested, in the Duke of York under the Patent to him from King Charles the Second of the 12th of March, 1664. In this Patent, perhaps the strongest, most sweeping, and most comprehensive in its terms, of any granted in America by an English Monarch, the King gave to the Duke the entire territory of New Netherland therein described, (though of course that name was not used) upon this tenure, namely; — "To be holden of us our Heirs and Successors, as of our Manor of East Greenwich and our County of Kent, in free and common soccage and not in Capite, nor by Knight Service, yielding and rendering * * * * of and for the same, yearly and every year, forty beaver skins when they shall be demanded, or within Ninety days after." The Patent was drawn by Lord Chancellor Claren- don, the Duke's father-in-law, and practically vested in him all the powers of an absolute Sovereign, sub- ject only in the execution of them to the laws of Eng- land. But in all matters not covered by those laws, his own rule in person, or by his Deputy-Governor, was supreme. The only power that was reserved to the King was thehearins: and determining of Appeals from Judgments and Sentences. The theory of the Patent was, that the King had resumed control of a territory originally belonging to the Crown by the right of its discovery by theCabots. That all people therein, Indians excepted, were tres- passers without legal right, that the territory was without lawful government, that the Sovereign of Great Britain, of his own right, therefore established there- in such government as he saw fit. That he chose to give, and did give, in the exercise of such right, the entire territory, and his own powers and rights there- in, and thereover, to his brother the Duke of York, with full authority to establish, and carry them into effect, as he should see fit. The only proviso, as to all " Laws, Orders, Ordinances, Directions and Instru- ments " that the Duke or his Deputy might make or execute, was, that they should " be not contrary to, but, as near as conveniently may be, agreeable to the Laws, Statutes and Government of this our Realm of England." ^ The principle the English acted on, was, that as regards the territory of New Netherland, the right of conquest governed, and the King could institute therein such form of government, system of laws and other in- stitutions, as he pleased. This view was not at all satis- factory to the owners and holders of land under Con- necticut titles in Suffolk County, Long Island, who were the very earliest to obtain new grants and patents from the Duke of York. The towns there took out patents from the Duke, with extreme reluctance, but they did it, nevertheless. Among these patents were that of Smithtown to Richard Smith of the 3d of March, 1665, that for Gardiner's Island in the same year, and that for Shelter Island to the Sylvesters of June 1st, 1666. The principle just mentioned was essentially modi- fied in its application by two things. It was limited by the terms of the Articles of Surrender, which bound the conqueror as well as the conquered. And it was also limited by that rule of the law of nations, which provides that the ancient laws of a conquered people remain in force till changed by the conqueror. Under these instruments and principles the rule of England, and the Lord Proprietorship of the Duke of York had its beginning in the "Province of New York in America." That Proprietorship lasted twen- ty-one years, (excepting only the fifteen months of the Dutch reconquest), ending on the 6th of February, 1685, on which day, by the death of his brother, King Charles, the Duke became James the Second, King of England. His Proprietary rights merging in those of the Crown on his accession to the throne. New York became thenceforward a Royal Province under a Royal Government, uncontrolled by any charter. From that time till the close of the Amer- ican Revolution by the Peace of 1783, she so remained, the freest and most flourishing of all the British American Provinces, ruled by her own people, enact- ing her own laws, supporting her own government 1 See Tatent. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 79 and local institutions by taxation imposed by her own elected Legislature, and by her own parish, town, and county authorities. The slight interruption, by the Dutch reconquest from the 9th of August, 1(573, to the 10th of Novem- ber, 1674, did not, except for the time being, change the character of the Proprietorship of the Duke of York in point of fact. But as the Province was re- st')red by the Dutch to England as a conquest under a treaty and a formal surrender of it pursuant to such treaty, the crown lawyers in England held that the Dutch I'econquest in 1673 terminated the Duke's Proprietorship; and that the renamed Province of New Netherland was vested anew in Charles the Second as King solely by the treaty of Westminster in 1674. Therefore a new Patent was granted by the King to the Duke on the 29th of June, 1674. It was almost in the same words as the first, vesting him again with the same sweeping and absolute rights and powers, but not mentioning the first Patent nor referring to it in any way. The object of this second Patent was to cure the defect in the first, that it was signed, sealed, and delivered, while the Dutch were in actual possession of the teiTitory it described, and therefore it was, by the law of England, void; and was not subsequently confirmed by Charles the Sec- ond after the title was really vested in him in 1677, by the treaty of Breda. Had Charles made such a confirmation, no second Patent would have been re- quired. The new Patent of 1674, on its face was an original grant, but in fact it simply revested the Duke with all the rights, powers, jurisdiction and territory he possessed under the Patent of 1664. These facts are distinctly stated, because the valid- ity of the confirmations of all Dutch groundbriefs, transports, and other grants, and all subsequent Eng- lish grants during the Proprietorship of the Duke of York, and the later Royal Government, as well as those originally made by Connecticut authorities on Long Island, and subsequently confirmed by the Duke, rests upon them. The tenure by which the Duke of York held his Province in New York was allodial in its nature. In this respect it was the same ;is that under which, as has previously been shown, the Dutch West In- dia Company held New Netherland under their charter, and the Patroons held their Patroonships under the different " Freedoms and Exemptions." But it was not to follow a good Dutch example, that this tenure was granted by the King and accepted by the Duke, but because the law of England had then been recently changed, and neither King nor Duke could do otherwise, even if they wished, of which there is no evidence. Four years before New York was given by the King to the Duke, and its surrender by the Dutch, the Parliament of England had passed that Great Act, second only to Magna Charta itself, — if it was second, — in its effect on English liberty, and the rights of English subjects, the act abolishing feudal tenures, and all their oppressive incidents for- ever throughout the realm. This was the famous " 12 Charles II, cap. 24,'" and its title is, "An Act taking away the Court of Wards and Liveries, and Tenures in Capite, and by Knight Service, and Purveyance, and for settling a Revenue upon his Majesty in lieu thereof." It swept away, at one blow, all the grievous feudal military tenures, their great exactions, and the means possessed by the monarch for enforcing them, as well as all charges payable to the King, or any lord paramount under him, arising therefrom; and prohibited their creation afterward, forever. Alter the clauses of aboli- tion, the act continues, — "And all tenures of any honours, manors, lands, tenements, or hereditaments, of any estate of inheritance at the common law, held either of the King, or of any other person, or persons, bodies politic or corporate, are hereby enact- ed to be turned into free and common socage, . . . any law, custom, or usage to the contrary hereof in any way notwithstanding." ' The fourth section pro- vided. " That all tenures hereafter to be created by the King's Majesty, his heirs or successors, upon any gifts or grants of any manors, lands, tenements, or hereditaments, of any estate of inheritance at the common law, shall be in free and common socage only, . . . and not by Knight Service or in Capite." As this abolition deprived the King of large reve- nues, and the means of supporting his military, and other governmental expenses, the act granted to him as a recomj)ense duties upon beer, ale, and other articles in common use.^ It is thus seen not only that there were no feudal rights nor privileges granted in New York to the Duke of York by his Patents, but that the King had no power whatever to grant any to him, or to anybody else. And none ever were granted by any British Sovereign, or British Governor, in that Province. The rights and privileges contained in the subsequent Manor grants in New York, were simply those ap- pertaining to, and consistent with, the free socage tenure on which they were granted, and under which they were held. This allodial tenure of land, though it has been for- merly referred to under the Roman Dutch legal system of New Netherland, may now be more fully described, as itwas also thetenure by which all lands in New York under the English system were held. 1 Section 1 of the act. 2 " Up to the passage of this act, every free land-owner was burdened with military service, whicli was not considered an incident of tennre, hut a duty to the State." Dighy"s Law of Kcal Property, 20. Hence, the sulistitution of taxation in lieu of military service by this act. is the foundation of governmental support by taxation, both in Kiigland and America, and of the existing systems of taxation in both countries. The military tenures " were sold, or released to the country in considera- tion of the hereditary revenue of excise by the Statute, 12 ch. 2, c. 24." Fourth Keport of the English Law Com:uissiouers, 110. 80 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. The law of land both in Holland and England was of Teutonic origin. In the former country it was modified earlier than in the latter by the conquest by the Romans, and the introduction of the Roman Law, and at a later period in each, by the introduc- tion of the Canon Law. The Teutonic idea of property in land was based on its conquest by a body of men under a leader or chief, — a successful barbaric invasion. The land so won was considered the com- mon property of its captors, not of the leader alone. He, as chief, had the regulation of the distribution of the conquest among the conquerors, and of the cultivation of the land by the distributees who re- ceived it. As he was the leader of this community in war so he was its head in time of peace. The land thus belonging to the community was in both Holland and England considered as what we should now call "public land." Among the Saxons it was called "folcland," that is, land of the folk, or people. As civilization progressed and Christianity was introduced, the band of barbaric invaders, or tribe, adopted, of necessity, a political organization. The leader became a chief of a district or principality, or king of a petty kingdom ; his followers became his supporters or subjects ; and the land was made the source of revenue, by its being given in separate parcels to individuals in severalty as their private property. Lands so given were granted by a writ- ten "book" as it was termed, which was a deed or charter, delivered to the grantee, and it was then said to be "booked '"to him, from which it was called "boc- land," that is, booked land. This "book," or grant, stated that the grantee was to hold the land free from all burdens and from any services or money payment, except three, — military aid in cas-eof invasion, manual, or money aid in the repairing of fortresses, and in the repairing of bridges, which duties were borne by all landholders indiscriminately, and was termed the f7-in- oda necessitas, or threefold obligation. This military aid, was simply the liability to be called on to defend the country in case of attack, and not the tenure by knight service under the feudal system, which tenure was unknown in England till after the Norman conquest. Thus before that event all land in England was either ' folcland " or " bocland." ' All land not made 'bocland' remained 'folcland' and was held in common by the community. Later it became vested in the chief, as its head man, and subject to his control. "Nearly, if not quite coex- tensive with the conception of "bocland," says Dig- by, "was that of allodial land. The term 'alod,' allodial, did not, however, have any necessary refer- ence to the mode in which the owuer.*liip of land had been conferred ; it simply meant, land held in abso- lute ownership, not in dejiendence upon any other body or person in whom the proprietary rights were supposed to reside, or to whom the possessor of the land I Digby's Hist. Law of Real Property, Cb. I. Sect. 1. j was bound to render service." ^ It was another name for 'bocland' and signified that it was devisable by will, and in case of intestacy was divisible among children equally.' It could be freely sold at plea.«ure by its possessor; or its beneficial enjoyment could be granted by him for a longer or shorter term, at the end of which it reverted to him or his heirs ; when this last disposition of it was made it was called "laenland," literally loan land, or in modern parlance leased land. The success of the Norman Conquest of England changed almost entirely these early allodial tenures. William the Conqueror introduced the military tenure of" Knight-service " or " in chivalry," with all its feudal attributes and exactions, which had come into vogue in the western and southern portions of the European continent. That system with its correlative rights of protection by the King or the lord, and of service as soldiers by the tenants or vassals, carried down through all classes of society from the highest to the lowest, termed the feudal system, thus introduced, be- came the basis of the English land system and land law. From William of Normandy to Charles the Second, gradually developed in the earliest reigns of the Norman Kings to its fullest extent, its principles governed English land, English law, and Engli>h thought, until the enactment of the statute of 1660 in the twelfth year of Charles the Second abolished feudalism forever, practically restored the old Saxon allodial tenures, and turned to freedom the mind of England. " Perhaps," said that most learned chief justice of Massachusetts, James Sullivan, in 1801, then that State's Attorney-General, " the English Na- tion are more indebted to this one act for the share of liberty they have enjoyed for a century and a half past, and for the democratic principles by that law retained in their government, than to Magna Charta, and all the other instruments of which they boast.'" To show how entirely different the "feudal sys- tem" was from the systems introduced into New- York by the Dutch and English ; and how erroneous have been, and are, the views that Lave been ex- pressed by American, and New England, as well as New York, writers, respecting the latter, it will be well to recur to what "feudalism'" really was. Scrcely any subject of an historical nature has been more fully and thoroughly investigated, studied, and written upon, in late years, by modern historical scholars than this. Germany, France, and England, have each produced writers who have given to the world the results of searche-s and investigations of the most exhaustive character ; von Maurer, Waitz, Eichorn, Roth, and Richter, in the former, Guizot, 2Tlie word "alod" (Latinized into aUodium, whence tlie Engli li "allodial") does not occur in Anglo .Saxon documents before tl'e eleventh century, when it appears in the Latin of Canute's laws in the Colbertine MS. as the equivalent of " bocland " or " hereditas. " Stuhbs Cons. Hist. "G, n. 3 Hist. Land Titles iu Mass. 52. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 81 Thiern-, Sismondi, Laveldye in France, and Palgrave, Austin, Freeman, Digby, Maine, and Stubbs in Eng- land. The latter, the latest writer on this subject, has treated it so fully, that a short statement almost in his own words will make the matter clear. Feudalism was of distinctly Frank growth. The principle which underlies it may be universal, but its historic development may be traced step by step under Frank influence, from its first appearance on the conquered soil of Roman Gaul to its full develop- ment in the jurisprudence of the Middle Ages. As it existed in England, it was brought full grown from France at the Norman Conquest ; ' and "it may be de- scribed as a complete organization of society through the medium of land tenure, in which from the King down to the lowest land owner all are bound together by obligation of service and defence: the lord to pro- tect his vassal, the vassal to do service to his lord ; the defence and service being based on, and regulated by, the nature and extent of the land held by the one or the other. As it developed territorially, the rights of defence and service were supplemented by the right of jurisdiction. The lord judges, as well as defends, his vassal ; the vassal does suit as well as service to his lord. In States in which feudal govern- ment has reached its utmost growth, the political, financial, judicial, every branch of public administra- tion, is regulated by the same conditions. The cen- tral authority is a mere shadow of a name. - It grew up from two sources, the beneficiary system and the practice of commendation. " The system tes- tifies to the country and causes of its birth. The bene- ficium is partly of Roman and partly of German ori- gin.^ In the Roman system the usufruct, the occupa- tion of land belonging to another person, involved no diminution of the status (the condition) of the occu- pier ; in the Germanic system he who tilled land that was not his own was imperfectly free. Commenda- tion on the other hand may have had a Gallic or Celtic origin, and an analogy only with the Roman clientship." * "The beneficiary system originated partly in gifts of land made by the kings out of their own estates to their kinsmen and servants with a special undertak- ing to be faithful, partly in the surrender 1)y the land- owners of their estates to churches or powerful men to be received back again and held by them as ten- ants for rent or service. By the latter arrangement • Freeman in liis fifth volume denies this in his usnal self-sufflcient man- ner, and attiicks ''lawyers " for sajing so, very fiercely. But before lie ends that cliapterlie confines his words to govennnehlal matieri, and really admits that " the lawyei-s " were right after all as to the tenures. >I. Stubbs' Cons. Hist,, 252. 'The beneficia, or benefices, were " grants of Koman provincial land by the chieftains of the tribes which overran the Roman Empire ; such grants being conferred on their associates upon certain conditions, of which the commonest was military service." Maine's Village Communi- ties, 132. The same writer al.io says, "that in the ineradicable tendencies of the Teutonic nice, to the hereditary principle, the benefices became descendible from father to son." * I. Stubbs' Cons. Hist. 254. the weaker man obtained the protection of the stronger, and he who felt himself insecure placed his title under the defence of the church. By the prac- tice of commendation, on the other hand, the inferior put himself under the personal care of a lord [^that is, commended himself to him, hence the term'] but with- out altering his title, or divesting himself of his right to his estate ; he became a vassal and did hom- age. The placing of his hands between those of his lord was the typical act by which the connexion was formed. And the oath of fealty \Jaithfidness'] was taken at the same time. The union of the bene- ficiary tie with that of commendation completed the idea of feudal obligation ; the twofold tic on the land, that of the lord and that of the vassal, was sup- plemented by the twofold engagement, that of the lord to defend, and that of the vassal to be faithful." " This oath of 'fealty' and wherein it differed from 'homage' may be explained best in the words ot Littleton, " Fealty is the same that fidelitas is in Latine. And when a freeholder doth fealty to his lord he shall hold his right hand upon a booke (a Bible) and shall say thus: Know ye this my lord, that I shall be faithfull and true unto you, and faith to you shall beare forthe lands which I claime to hold of you, and that I shall lawfully doe to you the cus- toms and services which I ought to doe, at the termes assigned, so help.nie God and his Saints; and he shall kisse the booke. But he shall not kneel when he maketh his fealty, nor shall make such humble rever- ence as is aforesaid in homage.* The practice of commendation became so very gene- ral, that in the words of Sir Henry Maine, it "went on all over Europe with singular universality of operation, and singular uniformity of result, and it helped to transform the ancient structure of Teutonic society no less than the institutions of the Roman Provincials."" It was one of the leading causes of the universality of feudalism in Europe. Well writes one of the most distinguished living jurists of New York, on this subject, — " Feudalism is compounded of barbaric usage and Roman law. While it resembled in some respects a Hindoo village community, it is in other respects quite different. The Hindoo communities gathered together by instinct, and new comers were introduced by fiction. The feudal obligation was created by con- tract. The feudal communities were, for this reason, more durable and varied in character than the ancient societies. Some would hold that the variety of Modern Civilizaiion is due to the exuberant and er- ratic genius of Germanic races. In opposition to this error, it may be asserted that the Roman Empire bequeathed to society the legal conception to which all this variety is attributable. The one striking and 6 I. Stubbs, 252. « Co. Litt., chap. II. sect. 91. 1 Hist, of Institutions, 155 82 HISTOKY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. characteristic fact in the customs and institutions of barbaric races is their extreme uniformity." ' The effect of feudalism on the society ot the era in Mhich it existed, was two fold. It repressed and harshly kept down the personal rights and freedom of what in our day we now term "the masses," but it also gave rise to, maintained, and estabii-shed in those who then ruled the masses of that day, those feelings, rules of conduct, and principles of action, to which are really due the vastly higher general civilization of both classes of people at this era. If we investigate feudalism in its social aspects, in the words of the late chief justice of Ceylon, " we shall find ample cause for the inextinguishable hatred with which, as Guizot truly states iu History of Civilization in Europe, it lias ever been regarded by the common people. But this ought not to make us blind to its brighter features. There was much in feudalism, especially as developed in the institutions of chivalry, that was pure and graceful and generous. It ever acknowledged the high social position of woman, it zealously protected her honour. It favoured the growth of domestic attach- ments, and the influence of family associations. It fostered literature and science. It kept up a feeling of independence, and a spirit of adventurous energy. Above all, it paid homage to the virtues of Courage and Truth in man, and of Affection and Constancy in woman." ^ Such was the feudal system in reality, its origin and principles. As a system of land tenure, or of govern- ment, it not only never existed in the Province of New York, but it was absolutely the opposite of the systems of both which were there established. No lord para- mount, either as Duke of York, or as a Lord of a Manor, was ever known within this State while an English Province. The former was a Propiietor only, as William Peun and Lord Baltimore were, in Penn- sylvania and in Maryland. The latter was an owner in fee with no powers, rights or privileges, but those appurtenant to, and consistent with, the freest allodial tenure. Moreover, it not only never existed, but it could not possibly have existed in New York. For it was prohibited by the statute law wiihin the realm of England four years before New York became an integral part of the dominions of that realm. What then was the tenure described, " as of our jnannor of East Greenwich and our County of Kent in free and common soccage and not in capite or by Knight service, upon which the Province of New York was holden under his grant from the King of Eng- land by the Duke of York as Lord Proprietor ? " Socage' tenure was a holding of lands by a certain service or rent. Certainty as opposed to the uncer- tainty of tenure by Knight service, or as sometimes iDwight's Introduction to the American edition of Maine's Ancient Law, LXIV. - Sir E. Crenry's Rise of the British Constitution, 83. 3 The word is now spelled with one '• c " only. styled, " in chivalry," was for its essence. It made no matter what the service, or rent, was, so long as it was absolutely certain. It might be by ploughing lands for a fixed number of days at a time fixed, or it might be for a fixed annual rent, payable either in cattle, produce or in money, or it might be by homage, fealty, and a fixed money rent, in lieu of all manner of services, or by fealty only in lieu of every other service.* This inherent element of certainty was what gave this tenure its power, and has made it the only tenure by which, in different forms and under different modifi- cations, and under systems based upon its principles, lands are now held in the English-speaking nations of the world. Property in land has a double origin. " It has arisen," in the words of Maine, "partly from the dis- entanglement of the individual rights of the kindred or tribesmen, from the collective rights of the Family or Tribe, and partly from the growth and transmuta- tion of the Sovereignty of the Tribal Chief. . . . Both the sovereignty of the Chief and the ownership of land by the Family or Tribe were in most of Western Europe passed through the crucible of feudalism ; but the first re-appeared in some well-marked char- acteristics of military or Knightly tenures, and the last in the principle rules of non-noble holdings, and among them of Socage, the distinctive tenure of the free farmer." Its essential character was " its liability to rents and services due, not to the State, but to the grantor, who in most cases was the lord of the manor, holding under a charter [meaning a grant or patent) given or confirmed by the crown." ® The word socage is generally believed to have been derived from " soca " a plough. It was " originally applied only to husband- men who owed fixed services for husbandry. Where these rustic services had not been commuted tbramoncy rent the tenure was called ' villein socage," as distin- gui-.hed from ' free and common socage.' * In Knight- service tenure, and iu the spiritual tenure of Francal- moigne or Free Alms, that is freedom from all earthly services [on which churches, abbeys, and cathedrals, in England held and still hold so many of their lands], and in all the military tenures the services were uncertain : from all other free tenants of lands a fixed amount of service, or rent, was due, and their tenures were included in the general name of socage ' It was a free tenure, the land a freehold, and the Elton's Tenures of Kent, 29. T A villein was an inhabitant of a villa, the ancient name of a farm, and in the earliest times was attached to it permanently. .\ud as many villas were included in a manor, it had often many villein's- These villeins gradually came to be allowed to hold parcels of land, on condition of manuring, or ploughing the lord's demesne lands, or on base or rustic services. Hence arose the tenure termed villein-socage. * Elton's Law of Copyholds, 3, note b. 1 lb. 3. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 83 holder a freeman, because he, as well as the land, was entirely free from all exactions, and from all rents and services except those specified in his grant. So long as these last were paid or performed, no lord or other power could deprive him of his land, and he could devise it by will, and in case of his death, intestate, it could be divided among his sons equally.' At a later period, after the Norman conquest, tliis latter quality of the tenure became changed by the introduction of the principle of primogeniture in all parts of England ; a principle of Teutonic origin, and one necessary to the maintenance of the feudal sys- tem as a military system. One of the parts of England which, at the time of its conquest, first submitted peace- ably to William of Normandy, was the Saxon Kingdom of Kent, afterward, and now, the County of Kent, the southeastern extremity of England. In consequence of this action the Norman king confirmed its inhab- itants in all their ancient laws and liberties. " Kent was firmly attached to the Conqueror by the treaty, which he never broke, that the law of Kent should not be changed.'- One of the provisions of the law of Kent was the custom or tenure of ' Gafolcund ' or ' Gavelkind,' one of the most ancient of the free socage tenures, by which the greater portion of that county was then, and is now held. According to this ancient relic of the early Saxon law, the land descended to all the sons equally, was usually devisable by will, did not escheat in case of attainder and execution for felony, and could be aliened by the tenant at the age of fifteen.' It was a freeman's tenure, and so general, though not universal, in the county, that it was con- sidered by the common law of England, and judicially taken notice of by the King's Courts as the " common law of Kent." The only instance in all England of a county having a different common law from the rest of the Kingdom. And it so continues to this day. Much of its area originally gavelkind has been changed by special acts of parliament, or, as it was termed, ' disgaveled,' and thus made knight ser- vice land and .subject to the law of primogeniture.* The name is derived from the Saxon word ' gafol,' or 'gavel,' [_the pronunciation of the words being ninilar in aouiid'] \\\\\ch was the Saxon word for rent, " in- cluding in that term money, labor, and provisions."^ Gavelkind land therefore means primarily rented land with the privileges above stated. One of the Manors of the Crown of England was that of East Greenwich in this favored County of Kent which had never been reduced to the new mili- tary tenures brought in by the Norman Conqueror, and owed no claim for suit or services or other obli- ' T>l(rbT. 72. 2 Elton's Tunures of Kent, 72. 'DiRliy'ii Hist. Tlpal Property, 38, n. 2. *Eltou"8 Touures of Kenl jxiij.in. SIbid 29. gallon than that of fealty and allegiance.* Hence it was that when the tenure of the British grants in America came to be settled, it was described as of our Manor of East Greenwich in the County of Kent, that manor being held only " in free and common soccage." The object being to give to the new pos- sessions in America the most favorable tenure then known to English law. The fixed "service" or "rent" on which New York was held in socage by the Duke of York was the yearly payment of"' forty beaver skins when they shall be demanded or in ninety days after." When the Puke became King in 1685, this nominal rent ceased and he held the Province from that date as Sovereign of England. And under him and his suc- cessors, from that v'ear until the peace of 1783, by vir- tue of this fact New York continued to be a Royal Province, under Royal Governors commissioned by its English monarchs under their signs manual. As such representatives of their Sovereigns were all grants, of Manors, and other great, and small, tracts of land, made by the Governors of New York as long as New York continued to be a British Province. The tenure of all was the same as that in the Patents from Charles II. to the Duke of York, "in fress it, preserving, however, all rights under the same as they had previously existed. The "Tenure of Real Property " is thus stated. I 1. The People of this State, in their right of sov- ereignty, are deemed to possess the original and abso- lute property in and to all lands within the jurisdic- tion of this State; and all lands, the title to which shall fail from a defect of heirs, shall revert or escheat to the people. ^ 3. All lands within this State are declared to be allodial, so that subject only to the liability to escheat, the entire and absolute property is vested in the own- ers, according to the nature of their respective estates ; and all feudal tenures of every description, with all their incidents, are abolished. ^ 4. The abolition of tenures shall not take away or discharge any rents or services certain, which at any time heretofore have been, or may hereafter be, created or reserved ; nor shall it be construed to afi'ect to change the powers or jurisdiction of any Court of Justice in this State.' From and after 1830, therefore, the land tenure of New York has been and continues to be purely allodial. The vested rights and incidents of the former socage tenures were preserved, but the erection of any other tenure than a pure allodial one is forbidden. J II. K. S,, Part II. Title I, p. 718, first ed. The state has thus after the lapse of centuries re- turned to the free and just ' alod ' of the earliest Saxon days of England. The nature of the old Feudal 3Ianors, and the dif- ference from them of the Freehold Manors of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in New York having been shown, the incidents, franchises and privileges of the latter next demand attention. 10. The Franchises, Privileges, and Incidents, of Manors in the Province of New York, and in the Covnty of Westchester, and the Parishes in the latter. The erection of ' Manors ' by the English in New York, like the previous creation of ' Patroouships,' by the Dutch in the same Province, was simply the es- tablishment and carrying out, of what they deemed the best method of promoting the growth and de- velopment of their new possession under their own laws and customs. To the same idea is due the grant- ing therein of similar large tracts of land which were not manors. The latter, the ' Great Patents,' as they were called, were usually granted to several grantees. The Manoi's were necessarily granted to one only. The franchises, privileges, and other valuable inci- dents, which the Manors possessed, and which the Great Patents did not possess, were much fewer than is generally supposed. The term ' feudal,' popularly applied to the former, has caused much misconcep- tion. The tenure of both classes of these crown grants was precisely the same, being " in free and com- mon socage as of the Manor of East Greenwich in the county of Kent," which has been already explained. The greatest difference between them lay in the pe- culiar public incidents, as they may be called, which constituted a Manor, incidents essential to its exist- ence, and which related more to the government and good order of the territory of the Manor and the pro- tection of the inhabitants, and their rights as English- men, than to the power and profit of the Lord. Tenants could, and did, take up lands under the grantees of the Great Patents, as well as under the Lords of the Manors. The former could, and did, settle people upon their Patents under leases, as well as deeds in fee, just as the latter did upon their Manors. Both classes of Proprietors sold in fee, or granted on leases of different kinds, just as their interests or wishes dictated. The Great Patents, their grantees, and the inhabitants upon them, were subject, in general and local matters, to whatever public territorial divisions of the Province embraced them, and the laws in force therein. The Manors, their Lords, and their inhabit- ants, whether tenants, or holders in fee simple of manor lands by purchase from the Lords, were sub- ject only to the jurisdiction and courts of the Manors in local matters. Both, in all matters not local, were governed by the laws, courts, and the civil and military authorities, of the county and of the Prov- ince. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE 3IAN0RS. 91 There were in the county of Westchester Six Manors, which togetiier comprised by far the hirgest jiart of its area. The Great Patents were much more numerous, but together not so extensive in area. These latter and the Borough-Town of Westchester, with a few small original grants, formed the rest of the county as it was originally. The lower part of the Equivalent lands " or " The Oblong," received in set- tlement of a boundary dispute from the colony of Con- necticut was not added to the county till the year 1731, and this too, was then embraced in a single Great Patent. The ^lanors were those of " Cortlandt," " Scarsdale," ' Pel/tarn," " Jlorrisania," " FonlhaM," and " Philipse- borouijh," or as it was, and is, usually written and pro- nounced " Philipseburgh." Of these, Cortlandt, and Philipseburgh, were much the largest. It will give a correct idea of the great extent and thoroughness of the manorial settlement of Westchester county, as well lis the satisfactory nature of that method of settlement to its inhabitants, although a surprise, probably, to many readers, when it is stated that in the year 17G9, one-third of the population of the county lived on the two Manors of Cortlandt and Philipseburgh alone. The Manors of Fordham, Morrisania, Pelham and Scarsdale, lying nearer to the city of New York, than these two, and more accessible than either, save only the lower end of Philipsburgh, were, if any thing, much more settled. It is safe to say that upwards of live- eighths of the people of Westchester County in 1769 were inhabitants of the six manoi-s that have been named. As the people upon the manors were Iree of general jury duty the fact threw upon the rest of the county an increased burden. The ' Burgess ' (or Rep- resentative) of the "Borough of Westchester" in the Assembly in 17G9, was John de Lancey of Rosehill, Westfarms, of the second, or Westfarms, branch of that family, being the second son of Peter de Lancey of Rosehill, Westfarms, and his wife Elizabeth, the daughter of Governor Cadwallader Golden. He at- tempted the relief of the non-manorial inhabitants of the county and brought this matter before the As- sembly in this speech, from which we learn the fact above-mentioned, — '■ Mr. Speaker, — As the qualification required by the act for returning able and sufficient jurors in the several counties of this colony, entirely disqualifies all the tenants settled upon the Manor of Philips- burgh, and great part of those settled upon the Manor of Cortlandt, in the county of Westchester, from serv- ing upon juries ; which makes that service extremely hard upon the other parts of the county (the Manore of Phili])sburgh and Cortlandt, containing at least one- third of all the inhabitants of the said county); I there- fore move for leave to bring in a bill, to enable and qualify the tenants holding lands improved of the value of sixty pounds (S150), either for years, or at will, within the Manors aforesaid to serve upon juries within the aaid county of Westchester." Leave was given, and the next day ^Ir. de Lancey introduced the bill. 'The jury act referred to required all jurors to be possessed either in their own rights and names, or that of Trus- tees, or in that of their wives, of "a freehold in lands, messuages, or tenements, or rents, in fee, feetail, or for life, of the value of sixty pounds New York cur- rency (S150) free of all incumbrances." In the City of New York alone personalty of sixty pounds value was permitted as a qualification. The object of Mr. de Lancey's bill was to make the tenants in the Manors, who were not freeholders, subject to jury duty. This legislative action proves that none of the leases in the manor of Philipsburgh were " fee-farm " leases, that is leases in perpetuity, for such leases were "freeholds," and the "tenants freeholders," by law; and that the same thing was true of a "great part " of the leases in the Manor of Cortlandt. Mr. de Lancey's attempt to aid his constituents was not successful. His bill failed to pass, but why, the jour- nals of the House do not show. Probably the tenants of the Manors were in a majority sufficient to control their members in the House. The two members for the County had the tenants of Philipsburgh, and of the four smaller manors of Scarsdale, Pelham, Morris- ania and Fordham among their constituents, and " The Manor of Cortlandt had its own representa- tive. One of the county members was Frederick Pliilipse, the third, and the then, LordofPliilijiseburgh (the other being John Thomas of Harrison), and the member for the Manor of Coi'tlandt, was Pierre van Cortlandt, of Croton, of the second branch of that family, and subsequently the first Lieutenant-Gov- ernor of the State of New York. Both the count}' members had a majority of Manor tenants in their constituency. The next year, 177, l>p. and T. 2 Assembly Journals. Session from ilst Xov. IVriO to iTih .Tan. 1770, p. 80. 92 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. politically powerful were the tenants of the manors there, and how well they were satisfied with their position. The objection coming from those only who were not manorial tenants. The peculiar incidents of an old English Manor have not been described, although they have been referred to. The definition of a Manor already given, shows that it had two Courts, a Court-Baron, and a Court-Leet. The scope and duties of the former of these, that in which the Lord exercised jurisdiction, we learn from Coke. "If," says he, "we labour to search out the antiquity of these courts-baron, we shall find them as ancient as manors themselves. For when the ancient kings of this realm, who had all England in demesne, did confer great quantities of lands upon some great personages with liberty to parcel the lands out to other inferior tenants, reserv- ing such duties and services as they thought con- venient ; and to keep courts where they might redress misdemeanors within their precincts, punish offences committed by their tenants, and decide and debate controversies arising within their jurisdiction ; these courts were termed courts baron." ' This jurisdiction was the very essence, so to speak, of a Manor, for the same great authority also says, that, " A Manor in these days [the age of Elizabeth, in which Coke wrote] siguifieth the jurisdiction and royalty incorporate rather than the land or scite."^ An old English Manor may be said to have con- sisted of: — 1. Demesne lands, which were the Lords personal demesne. These were of two kinds, first, the Manor- House and the land immediately about, or adjacent to, it, which the Lord himself cultivated for his own maintenance, or demised to others to be cultivated for that purpose, on terms of years, or for the life of the tenants ; and secondly, the uncultivated lands of the manor including those allowed as common lands for pasturage, &c., to the freehold tenants generally, which were termed the "wasted lands," or more usually the " Lords waste," not because they were worth nothing, but because they were untilled. 2. The services, rents, and duties, reserved to the Lord upon the original freehold leases to the freehold tenants of the manor. 3. The reversion of those jjarts of the demesne lands granted for lives or terms of years, and of those escheated to the Lord in the case of freehold tenants dying intestate and without heirs. 4. Jurisdiction in a Court-Baron, and the rents and services of the freehold tenants liable to escheat and owing attendance as suitors at the Court. This Court was a necessary incident of a manor, and without it, and at least two suitors, no manor could exist. The Lord, or his Steward always presided, no one else could hold it. The freehold tenants were the judges of fact, just as jurors are in ordinary Courts ; thus no 1 (.'iteii in Cruise on Dignities, 24. 2 Ibid. man could be tried except by bis peers. It was an absolute necessity that it should be held within the Manor limits, for if held outside, its proceedings were null and void. Hence it was usually held in or near the Manor House. 5. The right to hold a Court-Leet. This Court was not necessary to the existence of a manor as a Court-Baron was. It was simply one of the general franchises given in and by a Manor Grant. It was not given to all manors, but in those in New York it was usually one of the franchises granted. All the manors in Westchester County possessed this fran- chise. The Court-Leet was a Court of Record having a similar jurisdiction to the old Sheriff's " Tourns" or migratory courts held by the Sheriff' in the difl'erent districts, or 'hundreds' of his County, for the punish- ment of minor off"ences and the preservation of the peace, but had. more extended powers. It was a criminal Court only and took cognizance of all crimes from the smallest misdemeanors, up to, but excluding, treason. It was granted to lords of manors " in order that they might administer justice to their tenants at home." All the people in the district of the Court- Leet were bound to attend under penalty of a small fine. The Steward of the M.anor was the judge, and the people of the manor alone could be the jurors. " Anciently," said Lord Mansfield, " the Tourn and the Leet (derived out of it) were the principal Courts of Criminal Jurisdiction ; coeval with the establish- ment of the Saxons here. There were no traces of them either among the Romans or Britons ; but the activity of these Courts is marked very visibly both among the Saxons and the Danes." * 6. The Franchises annexed or appendant to a Manor. These were privileges specifically given by the Crown in the Grants of manors, or of lands not manors. "A franchise," says Cruise, "is a royal privilege or branch of the King's prerogative sub- sisting in a subject by a grant from the Crown." * When so granted they were said to be appendant to the manor, or other grant in which they are set forth. There was nothing whatever which was "feudal " in their nature. They were simply favors extended by the crown to the grantees of lands whether manorial, or non-manorial, to increase the value and enjoyment of their properties. They varied much, some manors having more, some less. Most of these franchises were common to both manorial, and non-manorial, lands. Some, however, were only granted to Manors, and were held by their Lords in addition to those com- mon to both these classes of Crown-granted lands. Among those of the non-manorial lands were Hunt- ing, Hawking, Fowling, Fishing, &c., among the lat- ter, those of Courts-Baron, Courts-Leet, Waifs, Estrays. Advowsons, Deodands, &c. In the case of Manors 3 Coke 2 Inst. 70. <3 Burrow's Bep. 18G0. See as to the jurisdiction of these Courts HaUani's " Middle Ages," 347. SDia-est, Title, xxvii. § 1. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 93 there were often special franchises granted, growing out of the geographical situation of the laud itself, or other special circumstances of a local nature, such as franchises to establish ferries, bridges, fairs and markets ; and for the tenants to meet and choose assessors and other local officers, and elect represen- tatives of the Manor in the General Assembly. The latter, a very high franchise, was conferred upon three only out of the great number of Manors in New York. These were the Manors of Cortlandt, Living- ston, and Rensselaerswyck, of which the former, the first iu which the franchise was granted, was the only one in Westchester County. All three of them bordered upon the Hudson River, and eventually embraced within their territorial limits large numbers of inhabitants. All these franchises were what the law terms " in- corporeal hereditaments," which are rights and pro- fits arising from, or annexed to, land. Among them was that of advowson and church patronage. An ad- vowson is a right of presentation to a church, or any ecclesiastical benefice. It existed in New York, during the Colonial period. The word is derived from the Latin advocatio, which means receiving in ciientship, because in England originally the one possessing this right was termed udvocutiiK ecclesice, as he was bound to defend and protect, both the rights of the church, and the clergyman in charge, Irom op- pression and violence. Hence the right of presenta- tion to a church acquired the name of advowson, and he w ho possessed the right was called the patron of the church. The origin of the right was this: — In the early days of Christianity the nomination of all ecclesiastical benefices belonged to the Church. When the piety of some rich and prominent men, or great lords, induced them to build churches, near, or upon, their own estates, and endow them with land called a glebe, or to appropriate the rent or tithes from neighbouring lands of their own, to their support, the bishops, (non-episcopal church organizations did not then exist) desiring to encourage such pious un- dertakings, permitted these rich men to appoint what person they pleased to officiate in such chlirches, and receive the emoluments annexed to them ; reserving to themselves only the power to examine, judge of, and pass u])on, the qualifications of the persons so nomi- nated. Originally a mere indulgence, this practice in process of time became a right. And those who had either founded or endowed a church naturally claimed and exercised the right of presenting a clergyman to the bishop for institution whenever the Church became vacant. This right of presentation originally allowed to the person who built or endowed a church, became by degrees annexed to the estate or Manor in which it was erected ; for the endowment, whether land, or i tithes of its produce, was taken as part of the Manor and held of it ; hence the right of presentation jiassed with the Estate or Manor to which it was appendant ' by grant, and thus became a species of property. ' ' Presentation ' is the offering of a clergyman by the patron, or owner, of an advowson to the Bishop or or- dinary, by a kind of letter in writing, requesting him to admit the clergyman named in it to the Church. When the Bishop, or Ordinary, alter due examina- tion, certified in writing that the clergyman was a fit person to serve the church, the latter was said to be "admitted." The Bishop, or Ordinary then "institut- ed" the clergyman, by the formal commitment to him of the cure of souls. This was done by the clergyman kneeling before the bi.sho]) and reading his promise of faithful duty from a written instrument prepared beibrehand with the episcopal seal attached, which he held in his hand.s, and afterwards retained. This gave him the right to the temporalities of the Church. After the completion of the " Institution" the Bishop, or Ordinary, issued a "Mandate of Induc- tion " in writing, directed to him who had the power to induct of common right, or, in case of there beiug no person possessing this power, to any other proper person whom he saw fit to name, to perform the of- fice. The Actual Induction was made by the author- ized person taking the clergyman and putting his hand on the door, wall, or other part of the church edifice, and saying to this eftect — " By virtue of this mandate to me directed I do induct you into the real, actual, and corporeal possession of the Church of (naming it) with all the rights, profits, and appurtenances thereunto belonging," or similar words to that effect. He then opened the door, and led the new clergyman into the church, who usually tolled the bell, if there was any, for a few moments, to make known his induction to his parishioners and the pub- lic. This course was followed in New York, and the other British-American colonies in which the church of England existed. But as there was no Bishop at that time in this country, the Ordinary was either the Governor, by virtue of his Commission, or the Bishop of London's Commissary, who was a clergyman ap- pointed by the Bishop to perform certain adminis- trative duties here, and one or the other acted in the Bishop's place. The Governor of the Province usually issued the mandate of, and appointed a proper person to perform the ceremony of. Induction. This right of advowson and church patronage was specifically granted in express terms to four out of the six manors in Westchester County, and is set forth specifically in the Manor Grants of ' Cortlandt,' ' Phil- ipseburgh,' 'Pelliam,' and ' Morrisania.' In that of Scarsdale it is not granted, nor in that of Fordham, a proof of the statement made above that Manor fran- chises varied in difl'ercnt Manor Grants. At the beginning, the instruments of Presentation and Induction in New York were in Latin, and many of them are recorded in the public offices of the older Counties, in that tongue. Later they were in English. The following is a complete sequence of these curious and instructive documents showing the Collation and Induction into the "Parish of Rye, 94 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Mamaroneck, and Bedford," of tlie Rev. Ebenezer Punderson, as its incumbent in the year 1763, the whole being in English. The originals are in the possession of John C. Jay, M.D., of Rye. They are printed in Bolton's History of the Church in the County of Westchester, page 300, etc. Tlie headings do not appear in the originals. In this case the right of Patronage was vested in the Wardens and Vestry of the Parish itself, as was often the case. THE PRESENTATION TO THE PARISH OF RYE OF MR. EBENEZER PUXDERSOX. "To the Honorable C'adwallader Golden, Esq., his Majesty's Lieu- tenant Governour, and Commander in Chief of the Province of New York, and the Territories depending thereon, in America : The Churchwardens and A'estrynien of the Parish of Eye, including the districts or precincts of Eye, Mamaroneck, and Bedford, in the County of Westchester, in the Province of New- York, the true and un- doubted patrons of the said Parish, within your Honour's government, in all reverence and obedience to your Honour, due and suitable, send greeting, in our Lord God everla-^ting, and certifye that to the said Par- ish of Rye, including the districts or precincts of Eye, JIamaroneck, and Bedford, now being vacant by the natural death of James Wetmore, the last incumbent of the same, and to our presentation of full right be- longing, we have called our beloved in Christ, Ebenezer Punderson, Clerk, to officiate in the said Parish church of Rye, called Grace Church ; and him, the said Ebenezer Pundereon, sends by these presents to your Honour, present, humbly praying that you would vouchsafe him to the said church and Parish of Rye, including the districts or pre- cincts aforesaid, to admit, institute, and cause to be inducted, with al^ its rights, members, and appurtenances, and that you will, with favour and effect, do and fulfill all and singular, other things which in this behalf are proper and fitting for your honour to do. In testimony whereof, we, the Churchwardens and vestrymen afore- said, have to these presents put our hands and seals, this day of Novem- ber, in the year of our Lord, one thousand seven hundred and sixty- three. Ebenezer Kxiffen, "1 V CJiurchtcartJenSj AxiiKEW Mekrit. j and seven Vestrymen." LIEUTENANT GOVERNOUR COLDEN'S ADMISSION OF MR. PUNDERSON TO THE PARISH OF RYE. " I, Cadwall.^ber Coi.den, Esquire, his Majesty's Lieutenant Gover. nour, and Commander in Chief of the province of New-York, and the Territories depending thereon in America, do admit you, Ebenezer Pun- d 'rson, Clerk, to be Rector of the Parish Church of Rye, commonly called Grace Church, and of the Parish of Eye, including the several districts or precincts of Rye, Maniaroneck, and Bedford, in the County of Westchester, within the said Province. Given under my hand and the prerogative seal of the Province of New- York, at Fort George, in the City of New- York, the seventeenth day of November, in the year of our Lord, one thousand seven hundred and sixty-three. C.vdwallader Colden." LIEUTENANT GOVERNOUR COLDEN'S INSTITUTION OF MR. PUNDERSON AS RECTOR OF THE PARISH OF EYE. " I, Cauwallader Colden, Esquire, his Majesty's Lieutenant Gover- nour and Commander in Chief of the Province of New-York, and the Territories depending thereon, in America, do institute you, Ebenezer Punderson, Clerk, Rector of the Parish Church, of Rye commonly called Grace Church, and of the Parish of Rye, including the several districts or precincts of Rye, Mamaroneck. and Bedford, in the County of Westchester, in the said Province to have the cure of the souls of the parishioners of the said Parish ; and take your cure and mine. Given under my hand and the prerogative seal of the Province of New- TTork, at Fort George, in the City of New-Y'ork, the seventeenth day of November, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and sixty-three. C'adwallader Colden." LIEUTENANT GOVERNOUR COLDEN'S MANDATE TO INDUCT MR. PUNDERSON INTO THE PARISH OF UYE. "The Honorable Cadwallader Colden, Esquire, his Majesty's Lieuten- ant Governour and Commander in Chief of the Province of New-Y'ork, and the Territories depending thereon in America. To all and singular Rectors and Parish Ministers whatsoever, in the Province of New-York, or to Andrew Merrit and Ebenezer Kniffen, the present Churchwardens of the Parish of Rye, in the County of M'estchester, and to the Vestry- men of the said Parish, and to each and every of you, greeting : — AVhere- as, I have admitted our beloved in Christ, Ebenezer Punderson, Clerk, to the Rectory of the Parish Church at Eye, commonly called Grace Church, and of the Parish of Eye, including the several districts or precincts of Eye, JIamaroneck, and Bedford, in the County of Westchester, within this government, to which the said Ebenezer Punderson was presented unto me by the Churchwardens and Vestrymen of the said Parish, the true and undoubted patrons of the said Parish, vacant, as is say'd by the natural death of James Wetmore, the last incundient there, on or about the nineteenth day of Jlay, one thousand seven hundred and sixty ; and him, the said Ebenezer Pundei-son, I have instituted into the Rectory of the said Parish Church and Parish, with all their rights, members, and appurtenances, observing the laws and canons of right, in that behalf required and to be observed. To you therefore, jointly and severally, I do commit, and firmly injoining. do command each and every of you, that in due manner, him, the said Ebenezer Punderson, or his lawfull Proctor, in his name, and for him into the real actiial, and corporal possession of the Rectory of the said Parish Church and Parish, including the districts and precincts aforesaid, and all of their rights and appur- tenances, whatsoever, you induct, or cause to be inducted, and him so inducted you do defend : and of what you shall have done in the premises thereof, you do duely certify unto me or other competent judge, in that behalf, when there unto you shall be duely required. Given under my hand and the prerogative seal of the Province of New- Y'ork, at Fort George, in the City of New-Y'ork, the seventeenth day of November, in the year of our Lord, one thousand seven hundred and sixty-three." C'adwallader Colden." CERTIFICATE OF MR. PUNDERSON'S INDUCTION INTO THE RECTORSHIP OF THE PARISH OF RY'E. " I, John Milner, Rector of the Parish of Westchester, in the County of Westchester and Province of New-Y'ork, do hereby certifye, that by virtue of a warrant hereunto annexed, from the Honourable Cadwalla- der Colden, Esquire, his SFajesty's Lieutenant Governour and Com- mander in Chief of the Province of New-York, aforesaid, and the Terri- tories depending thereon, in America ; I have this day inducted the Rev, Ebenezer Punderson, into the real, actual, and corporal possession of the Rectory of the Parish Church of Rye, commonly called Grace Church and of the Parish of Rye, including the several districts or precincts of Rye, JIamaroneck, and Bedford, in the County of Westchester aforesaid, with all their rights, members, and appurtenances, the 2l6t day of November, .\nno Domini, 1763. The induction of the Rev. Ebenezer Punderson being executed, the above certificate was signed, in conse- quence thereof, by the Rev. John Milner, in the presence of us, who subscribe our n»mes as witness thereunto. JOHN JIILNER, Rector of SI. Peter's Church Westchester, and twenty-one others." SIR. PUNDERSON'S DECLARATION OF CONFORJIITY. "I, Ebenezer Punderson, do here declare my unfeigned assent and consent to all and everything contained and prescribed in and by ye Book entitled the Book of Common Prayer, and administrations of ye sacra- ments ; and ye Rites and Ceremonies of ye Church, according to the use of the Church of England ; together with ye Psalter or Psalms of David, pointed as they are to be sung or sai. satisfactory terms, which is termed Enfranchising the lands. It will be seen when a town or city has over- grown a Manor and the latter has been divided into lots how very valuable manors in such a condition become. The writer personally knew of such an in- stance in Gloucestershire, where the City of Chelten- ham has spread over the Manor of that name. A little upwards of twenty years ago, that manor was purchased in the manner just mentioned, and the new Lord issued through his Steward, who was also the Steward of the former Lord, his proposals for En- franchising the lots in the Manor within that City. A copy of them is here given as an illustration of the nature and working of copyhold lands in an old Eng- lish Manor, and their advantages and disadvantages, and the method by which they can become lands in fee simple. Although no copyhold lands did exist or could have existed, in New York the matter is of interest in connection with the general subject of this essay. "manor of cheltexham. Enfrancliisement of Copyhold Property. The Purchase by Robert Sole Lingwood Esquire of the Manor of Cheltenham having been completed, we are requested by him, as Lord of the Manor, to signify' to the Copyholders that every facility will be afforded to those who desire to enfranchise their Copyhold Property, and that the terms on which such eufran- cuisement may be effected can be ascertained either through us or by api^lication to Mr. Lingwood. AVhilst very reasonable terms will now be accepted to induce the Copyholders to avail themselves of the present opportunity to effect enfranchisements, the Lord of the Manor directs us to inform the Copyhold- ers that he requires all Leases and dealings by the Owners with their Copyhold Tenements to be made in strict conformity with the Act of Parliament reg- ulating the Customs of the Manor ; and this notifica- tion is rendered the more necessary because Leases have heretofore frequently been made and executed by Tenants of the ilanor in violation of the Custom regulating the mode of leasing, and because a Lease of Copyhold properly by the Owner made contrary to the Custom occasions an absolute forfeiture to the Lord of the property so leased. Among the objections to Copyhold property which will be got rid of by Enfranchisement may be enu- merated the following : 1. The risk of forfeiture of the property by reason of ignorance in granting Leases contrary to the Cus- tom. — 2. The expence of the perpetually recurringStewarda' fees payable on every occasion of dealing by Sale or Mortgage with the Copyhold property. — 3. The like expence of Stewards' fees payable on the death of every Owner of Copyhold property, for the admittance of his heir or devisee. — 4. The exjience and inconvenience, frequently oc- 98 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. casioned, to the Wife of a Copyholder, of having to travel from a distance to make in person a surrender of property sold or mortgaged by her Husband. — 5. The liability to publicity consequent on the sur- render of Copyholds being made in open Court, and the proceedings being recorded on the Court Rolls which are accessible to all the Tenants of the Manor. This is particularly objectionable with reference to Mortgages. — 6. The liability to absolute forfeiture of the prop- erty, if the Owner dig clay or brickearth therefrom, or cut timber, or otherwise commit waste without the previous sanction of the Lord. Many other grounds might be stated in favor of the Enfranchisement of Copyholds — butthe foregoing are some of the more important ; and in Cheltenham, where one-half of the property is Copyhold, nothing need be added to shew the importance of the Copyholders availing themselves of the opportunity now offered to them of immediately enfranchising their property on reasonable terms. — Cheltenham W. H Gwinnett, 19 January, 18(53. Steward of the Manor." One incident of a manor was the right to tithes which sometimes could be acquired by the lords by prescrip- tions. This incident, as the manors of New York were new, was of little value for no prescription could attach to a new manor. It is singular, however, that in the very first manor erected in Westchester County, that of Fordham, in 1671, provision was made for the pay- ment of a parson when it should have inhabitants. Its Lord, John Archer, and his heirs, were granted the privilege of obliging the inhabitants, when there should be enough of them, to contribute to the maintenance of a minister.' Had this been done which it never was, the method of contribution would naturally have been by tithes. As tithes were not known in America, it is perhaps well to explain briefly what they really were. During the first ages of Christianity the clergy were supported by the voluntary offerings of their flocks. But this being a precarious subsistence then, as it is now, the eccle- siastics in every country in Europe, in imitation of the Jewish law, claimed, and in course of time es- tablished, a right to the tenth of all the produce of lands. This right appears to have been fully ad- mitted in England before the Norman Conquest, and acquired the name of tithe from a Saxon word sig- nifying tenth. " Dismes or Tithes are an Ecclesias- tical inheritance, collateral to the estate of the land, and of their proper nature due only to Ecclesiastical persons by the ecclesiastical law.- They were merely a right to the tenth part of the produce of the soil, produce of live stock, and the personal in- dustry of Ihe inhabitants, in return for the benefit the latter derived from the ministry of their spiritual I Manor Grant of Fordham. II, Bolton, 506, 2d ed., and ^os(. 211. D'Avner's Abridgment of Com. Law, 682. pastors. They were an application of the Mosai law to modern exigencies, very similar to certain ap- plications of other parts of that dispensation to thei own exigencies by the Puritan settlers of NewEngland, and were like the latter, strictly enforced. Both wer~ simply methods of paying the clergy. They were o various kinds and descriptions varying with the pro ducts of the soil, but these require no further men tion here. Glebe lands, however, were very common in Amer- ica, in New York, and in Westchester County. They were lands given as an endowment by the Lords of Manors, and other large landholders, for the support, or in aid of the support, of Rectors, or other clergy- men, of parishes. The original parishes of West- chester County all had glebes ; and so, towards the close of the Colonial era, had the diff'erent churches and parishes erected and formed at different places, out of those parishes. Of course, all the original par- ishes as well as the later ones, were parishes and churches of the Church of England, as is shown by their very nomenclature. A nomenclature which the dissenting organizations of all kinds always repud- iated, and never have used, since they severally came into existence during the last three centuries. Like all English parishes these in Westchester County were territorial divisions, each having Church War- dens, Vestrymen, and minor Parish officers. In addition to their duties and powers relative to the Parish church, its Rector, and the maintenance, of church services in their I'uUness and propriety, the Wardens and Vestrymen possessed, exercised, and were by law bouudto perform, many civil duties, now laid upon, and performed, by Town and County offi- cers, such as the repairs of highways and bridges, maintenance of the poor, the assessing and collection of rates and taxes, and similar local duties, including the preservation of the public peace. They were not, as Church wardens and Vestrymen now are, officers of a purely ecclesiastical organization, but the civil officers of the parishes or territorial organizations of the church of England, as established by law in the County of Westchester. They were elected by all the freeholders resident in their respective parishes, whatever their religious views might be. And before entering upon the duties of their offices, pursuant to a law of the Province passed the 27th day of July 1721, took the following oath annually, which of itself demonstrates their powers in one of the im- portant respects just mentioned : — " You do -Swear on the Holy Evangelist, That you and every of you shall well and truly execute the Duty of an Assessor, and Equally and Impartially assess the several Freeholders and inhabitants, accord- ing to the value of their respective Estates, in an equal proportion, in every of your respective City, Counties, and Precincts, for lehich you are chose Vestry-men and according to your best Skill and Knowledge therein. You, shall spare no persons for Favour or Affection, or THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. grieve any person for Hatred or III Will. So Help you God!" 1 Their powers and duties of every nature were per- fectly well understood and acknowledged, and their authority obeyed, without hesitation, by the people of Westchester County throughout the Colonial era. Oc- casionally some bitter opponent of the church of England would try to prevent the performance of their legal duties or the legal exercise of their powers, by word, and deed, sometimes with great heat and violence, just, as the dissenting clergy did in matters of the exercise of clerical functions. But their legal rights and duties as parish officers under the laws of the Province were never contested or denied in the Courts of the Province. The People knew theni perfectly and acted accordingly. A remarkable proof of this was furnished in the case of the Parish of Rye, in 1794, eleven years after the peace of 1783, and six years after the first organization of the County into township.*, in 1688, which terminated the political existence of the Parishes and the Manors. Certain creditors of the " late Parish of Rye," in that year obtained payment of the debts due them from the various newly organized towns form- erly parts of that Parish, through an Act of the Legis- lature of the State passed for that express purpose. The executors of one of the Creditors sued " .Joshua Purdy one of the Church Wardens of the late Parish of Rye " and recovered judgment. Thereupon he and the other creditors laid the case before the Legislat- ure which granted the relief sought by passing the following Act, thus showing the continued and ac- knowledged lawful action of the Parochial officers of the Parish of Rye, under the Ministry Act of 1(59.3, which created the Parish, up to its extinction by the Act of 1784, repealing that Act, and its subsequent transformation into townships by the Act of 1788. The Act with its interesting preamble, and severe pro- visions for its due enforcement is in these words ; — An Act for raisinr/ Monies in arrear from the lite Parixh of Rye, in the County of Westchester. Passed the 28th of Janttary 1794. Whereas it hath been represented to the Legisla- ture that a judgment of fourteen pounds damages hath been obtained by the executors of John Law- rence, deceased, against Joshua Purdy, as one of the late Church Wardens of the late Parish of Rye, in the County of Westchester, for monies in arrear to their late testator for keeping and supporting a pauper committed to his care by the said Joshua Purdy, together with the Costs of suit, and that other monies are in arrears from the late parish of Rye to other persons ; Therefore ; Be it Exacted by the People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, That it shall and may be lawful for the Supervisors of the said County of Westchester, or the major part of ' II. Bradford's Lawa, 211 ; I. Liv. * Sniitli, 146. them, and they are hereby required at their next annual meeting to examine into, and ascertain the amount of the monies so recovered as aforesaid, as also the costs of defending the said suit, and to ascer- tain also the amount of other monies so due from the late Parish of Rye as aforesaid, and to cause the said monies, and also such other sum or sums of money as they shall find to be so due, together with one shil- ling in the pound for collections, and three pence in the pound for the fees of the County Treasurer for re- ceiving and i)aying the same, to be levied on and raised from the Towns which constitute the said late Parish of Rye, in the same manner as the contingent charges of the said County are usually raised ; which monies when so raised, shall be paid by the Collect- ors respectively, to the Treasurer of the said County on or before the first Tuesday of February in the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety-five, who shall pay the same after deducting his fees, to the persons to whom the monies are due: and if any Collector shall refuse or neglect to perform the duty required of him by this act, he shall forfeit and pay the sum of twenty pounds to the Treasurer of the said County to be recovered with costs in any Court having cognizance thereof by an Action of debt in the name of the Treasurer of the said County for the time being, and to be disposed of for the use of the same County in such manner, and for such purposes as the Supervisors of the said County, or the Major part of them shall think proper and direct.'^ 11. The Church of England Parochial organization in West Chester County in its relation to the JIanorx therein. In England the Boundaries of a Parish and a Manor were often coincident, and in the very earliest times this was generally the case. Later a Manor, of- ten embraced more than one Parish. Sometimes a Parish contained within its limits two or more Manors or parts of Manors, and lands non Manorial. In New- York the latter was the case. In the County of W^est- chester the Parishes erected, in 1()93 by an act of the Legislature were, the " Parish of Westchester," and the "Parish of Rye." The former included West- chester, Eastchester, Yonkers and the Manor of Pel- ham, the latter Rye, Mamaroneck, and Bedford.'' These divisions were termed the " Precincts" of these Parishes. The Parish of Westchester included the three Manors of Pelham, Morrisania, and Fordham, with the lower part of Philipfcburgh. The "Ten Farms," as Eastchester was originally termed, were separated from the mother Parish and erected on the petition of its people into a Parish by itself in the year 1700, under a special act of the Legislature, "by the name and stile of The Parish of Eastchester in = Laws of the 17th Session A.D. 1794, p. 5. 3 11. Bradford, 19-20.' 100 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the County of Westchester." ^ The " Parish of Rye" included the Manor of Scar&dale, and the non-man- orial lands of Rye and Bedford. Later Yonkers was taken from Westchester, and made a Parish by itself. It M'as the only Parish €ntirely embraced within the limits of a Manor, being wholly included within the boundaries of Philii^se- burgh as they are described in the Manor-Grant of that Manor. New Rochelle was taken out of the Manor of Pelham and eventually made a Parish by itself, though it long continued a Precinct of the Parish of Westchester. These were the Parishes in Westchester County, one of the four Counties of New York, in which, the Church of England became, under the legal action of the Crown of England in its conquered Province, the Established Church ; the others being the Counties of i New York, Richmond, and Queens. A misconception has existed in relation to the origin and establishment of the Church of England in the part of the territory of New York, comprising the four Counties that have been named. It has been owing mainly to the little attention bestowed on the subject, both by those who are now the successors in belief of the Church of England since the American Revolution, and those of the dissenting ecclesiastical organizations. The few writers who have referred to the subject at all, have taken for granted, and honestly believed, that no such establishment ever existed, and, of course, have written in that belief and with that idea. But some attention to the Authorities, and the then law, bearing upon the subject, will show that the current popular opinion is not as well found- ed as has been supposed. The question is a purelj' historical one. And only in an historical point of view can, and will, it be con- .sidered here. From and after the English conquest of New York in 1664, excepting only the fifteen months that the Dutch reconquest of 1673 lasted, under all the Eng- lish Governors, their Chaplains maintained the ser- vices of the Church of England and performed all i clerical duties in the chapel in the Fort in New York. By the several "Commissions" and "Instructions" to the Governors under the signs-manual of their Sovereigns, and their several oaths of olBce, the dif- ferent Governors were commanded and compelled to maintain and support the Church of England in the Province of New York. This was the exercise in New York of a power which was legally vested in the Sovereign of England by the law of England, and which by his coronation oath he was bound to exer- cise. Although so strictly commanded, the Governors were unable to carry out their Instructions in any other way than in the King's chapel in the Fort, as above stated, for twenty-nine years. This was owing to the fact that the English speaking people in the Province were so few in comparison with the Dutch, and the French, (the latter alone being one-fourth of the City population prior to 1790), that the church in the Fort was suflBcient for their needs in the City ; while those in other jiarts of the Province where there were any English at all were so very few, that it was impossible to act at all in the matter. All this time it must be borne in mind that the Commissions and Instructions of the Governors were continually in force. At length the increase of the English population became sufficient to justifv a movement putting them in operation. On the 28th of August, 1692, Colonel Benjamin Fletcher arrived in New York as Governor in the ship " Wolf," having been ap- pointed by William and Mary on the 18th of the preceding March. ^ He was warmly attached to the i Church of England. Chief Justice Lewis Morris in a judicial opinion in 1701, speaks of him as "Colonel Fletcher (justly styled the great patron of the Church of England here)." ^ At his instance, pursuant to his Commission and Instructions, the Legislature, com- posed of the Governor, Council, and Assembly, an- swering to the present Governor, Senate and Assembly, passed on the 24th of March, 1693, seven months only after his arrival as Governor, "An Act for Settling a Ministry and Raising a Revenue for them in the City of New York, County of Richmond, Westchester and Queens Counties."* This act gave an impetus to the Church of England in New York, which it never af- terwards lost. Under it and the effijrts and support of a few English Churchmen in the City of New York who had organized themselves into a body styled "The Manajiers '^f the Church of England in New York," at the head of which was Colonel Caleb Heathcote, that Church began a growth, which has continued to this day. Increasing ever after, some- times faster, sometimes slower, that Church became during the Colonial era, as it has continued to be since the American Revolution, under its present title of the Protestant E]>iscopal Church in the United States, the leading church in intiueuce and standing, i but not in numbers, in the City, Province, and now State of New York. Under, or rather by, this Act of 1693, the Par- ishes of Westchester County were constituted. The reasons why this " Ministry Act," as it was commonly styled, was confined to the regions it names in establishing the Church of England have not been adverted to by any writer who has mentioned it. The Counties it designates were the only portions of the Province in which English-speaking people dwelt, with the single exception of the County of Suffolk, iu the eastern portion of Long Island. In all the other counties of the Province, the Dutch, with many French in two or three of them, were the sole inhabi- tants. In those counties the Dutch church, for fifty III. Bradford, 39. 2 III. Col. Hist., 8i% 833. scbalmei-s Opinions, 257. * II. Bradford's Laws, I'J. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 101 years prior to 16G4, the Established Church in the Province, with which the French Protestants, outside of New York City, generally affiliated, was maintained in its worship, privileges, property and dependence on the Church of Holland, by the Crown of England, pur- suant to the Articles of Surrender of 1(3(34, the Treaty of Breda in 16G7, and the Articles of Surrender of 1674. All that it really lost by the change of dominion from Holland to England was the pecuniary support it derived from the Dutch West India Company under the ditl'erent charters of Freedoms and Exemptions, and the title of the ' Established Church.' Hence it was impossible to establish the English Church in those parts of the Province, where not only were there no English-speaking people, but where the pre- existing Dutch Church was guaranteed by the English Crown in its faith, worship, and rights of property, neither of which, by the law of the land, could be interfered with in any way whatsoever. In Suflblk County, the only other English-speaking region of the Province, there existed an Established church, the Congregational Church of New England. That County claimed to be a part of, and was claimed by, the Colony of Connecticut, was represented for years by delegates in the " General Court " at Hartford, and was an integral part of that Colony. As such, the " General Court," under the " Body of Laws of Connecticut, concluded and established in May, 1(350," ruled supreme in church and state on the east end of Long Island. What that rule so " estab- lished " was, is best stated in the very words of " The Laws of Connecticut Colony." " It is ordered by the Authority of this Court; That no persons within this Colony shall in any wise imbody themselves into Church Estate without consent of the General Court, and the approbation of Neighbour Churches. "It is also ordered by this Court; That there shall be no Ministry or Church Administration entertained or attended by the Inhabitants of any Plantation in this Colony distinct and separate from and in opposi- tion to that which is openly and publicly observed and dispensed by the approved Minister of the place, except it be by approbation of this Court and Neigh- bour Churches, upon penalty of the forfeiture of Five pounds for every breach of this order "This Court having seriously considered the great Divisions that arise amongst us about matters of Church Government, for the Honour of God, welfare of the Churches, and preservation of the publick peace 80 greatly hazarded. " Do Declare ; That whereas the Congregational Churches in these parts for the general ' of their Pro- fession and practice have hitherto been approved ; We can do no less than approve and countenance the same to be without disturbance until better light in an orderly way doth appear. " But yet forasmuch as sundry persons of worth for > So in the original. prudence and piety amongst us are otherwise perswad- ed (whose welfare and peaceable satisfaction we desire to accommodate; this Court doth Declare; That all such persons, being so approved according to Law, as Orthodox and Sound in the Fundamentals of Chris- tian Religion, may have allowance in their perswa- sion and Profession in Church ways or Assemblies without disturbance. . . . " It is further ordered ; That wheresoever the Minis- try of the Word is established according to the order of the Gospel throughout this Colony, every person shall duely resort and attend thereunto respectively upon the Lord's day, and upon such publick Fast dayes and dayes of thanksgiving, as are to be general- ly kept by the appointment of Authority. And if any person within this Jurisdiction, shall without just and necessary cause, withdraw himself from hearing the publick Ministry of the Word, after due means of conviction used, he shall forfeit for his absence from every such meeting _/?t;e shillings. . . . " It is ordered by this Court ; That the Civil Authori- ty here established hath power and liberty to see the Peace, Ordinances and Rules of Christ be observed in every church according to his Word ; as also to deal with any Church member in a way of civil justice notwithstanding any Church relation, office, or inter- est, so it be done in a civil and not in an ecclesiasti- cal way, nor shall any church censure degrade or de- pose any man from any Civil Dignity, Office or Au- thority he shall have in the Colony.^ Such was the Established Congregational Church of Connecticut, on the East end of Long Island. To both it and the Colony, the final determination of the Joint-Commission appointed to settle the boundary question after the Dutch surrender, that the ea.stern part of Long Island was included in the Duke of York's Patent and was a part of New York, was a blow as severe as it was unwelcome, and the people of that region protested against it, but in vain. Al- though this decision severed the civil connexion between Suffolk County and the Colony of Connecti- cut, it did not affect the ecclesiastical connexion be- tween them except that it ended the latter's power to enforce its church laws there by the civil arm. And its effect is perceptible to this day, notwithstanding the fact, that Presbyterian ism came there about 1717, and that, since the American Revolution, several other forms of Christian belief have obtained a foothold in that County. So strong was, and is, this old feeling, that the editor of the Southampton Records, published in 1877, says in his preface to the second volume, " Had the wishes of the i)eople been consulted, this union would have still continued, and to-day our delegates to the Legislature, would ascend the Connecticut River rather than the Hudson." '' These were the causes, the efficiency of which can- - Book of the General Laws, collected out of the Records of the GeneraL Court, pp. 21, 22. Brinley'a Beprint of 1865, of tlie ed. of lliT.'i. 3 Jlr. W. S. Pelletrcau. 102 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. not truthfully be denied, why the English Governors of the Province of New York, in obedience to the "In- structions " of the English King, could take no steps to establish the Church of England, except in those 2)arts of that Province, where it could possibly be done. The Church of England in New York originated not in this " Ministry Act"' as has been so generally believed and stated, but in the earlier action of the English Sovereigns, in virtue of vlie law of England. That act was merely the second step taken in obedi- ence to the Royal Instructions. It was also an j illustration of a principle, which obtained through- out British America Irom the earliest settlement of Virginia down to the close of the American Revolution. That principle was this, "that some form of religion, dissent from which in- j volved serious civil disabilities was established in nearly all the Colonies by virtue, of either the local or the imperial law." These are the words of Ex-Pro- vost Stille of the University of Pennsylvania, in his "Religious Tests in Provincial Pennsylvania." ' Mr. 8tille has treated this subject so ably, and so well, and his conclusions being so nearly identical with those to which its investigation had already led the writer, that his statement (which has only appeared since this portion of this essay was begun) is here given in preference to the writer's own, which was not , quite so full, and because it corroborates his views. "The truth is," says Mr. Stille, "that during the Colonial period we were essentially a nation of Pro- testants, with fewer elements outside Protestantism than were to be found in any countrj- of Europe, and that we, forced to do so, either by our own earnest conviction that such was the true method of support- ing religion, or by the laws of the Mother-country, took similar methods of maintaining and perpetuating ■ our Protestantism, excluding those who dissented from | it from any share in the government, and frankly adopt- [ ingthe policy which had prevailed in England from the time of Queen Elizabeth There were, it is true, in some of the Colonies, especially New York, at times ' ineffectual murmuriugs ' against laws which forced people to pay taxes for the support of a ministry whose teachings were not in harmony with the re- ligious sentiment of the great mass of the inhabitants,^ and in Pennsylvania there was a long, and at last a successful struggle to induce the Imperial Govern- ment to regard the affirmation of a Quaker as equiv- alent to the oath of another man ; but if there were any men in our Colonial history who, after the ex- ample of William Penn, and Lord Baltimore, lifted up their voices to protest, as these men had done, against the violation of the jirincipleof religious liberty here, I have not been able to discover their names. The I IX. Penn. Mag. of History, 372. 'The laws in the New England Colonies, though not mentioned Ijy Mr. Stillfe, were still more severe than the Ministry .\ct of New York in compelling dissenters from the Puritanism of those colonies, to pay ta.\es to support their "Established Cliurch." only subject of a quasi-ecclesiastical nature which appears to have excited general 'interest and to have met determined opposition was a scheme, at one time said to have been in contemplation of sending Bishops to this country. It was opposed not so much because it was thought to be the first step towards forming a Church Establishmentin this [whole] country, as be- cause the Colonists had a peculiar abhorrence of the methods of enforcing the jurisdiction of the English Church as they were familiar with them in the old country. They may have forgotten many of the sufferings they had endured in England in conse- quence of their non-conformity and even committed themselves to a theory of. Church establishment, but there was one thing they never could forget, and that was the prelatical government of Land and the High Commission, and upon this were founded the popular notions of the authority wielded by Bishops. ... I I am well aware that these statements of the general prevalence of a principle here during the Colonial period, which in contrast to that now universally re- cognized I must call the principle of religious intol- erance, will ai)pear to many too wide and sweeping. But a very slight examination of the provisions in this subject in the laws of the Colonies will, if I mis- take not, produce a different impression. In Vii-ginia where the English Church was early established by law and endowed, men who refused or neglected to bring their children to be baptized were punished with civil ]>enalties; Quakers were expelled from the Colony, and should they return thither a third time, they were lialjle to capital punishment. Any one who denied the Trinity or the truth of the Christian religion was deprived by the Act of 1704 of his civil rights, and was rendered incapable of suing for any gift or legacy. In New England, except in Rhode Island, religious intolerance was very bitter. It is true that in Massachusetts, under the charter of 1691, the power of committing those barbarous acts of perse- cution of which the theocracy of the old standing order had been guilty was taken away, and all Christiana, save Roman Catholics, were permitted to celebrate their worship, yet none but members of the Congre- gational Church could be freemen, and all were taxed for the support of the Ministry of that Church. In Elaine which was a District of Massachusetts, in New Hampshire, and in Connecticut, the same general system of religious intolerance prevailed. Conformity was the inflexible rule throughout New England. In New York, the Dutch were protected by the provisions of the Treaty of Breda, which guaranteed them the possession of their property then held there for reli- gious purposes and their ecclesiastical organization.' But the royal Governors of that Province expelled any Catholic priests who might be found within their territory on the plea that they were exciting the In- 3 The articles of the two " surrendei-s of 1064 and 1674," should have been mentioned also in this connexion. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 103 dians to revolt against the government, and they established the English Church, so for as it could be done in a Province where the Episcopalians were very few in number by requiring each of the towns to raise money lor the support of the clergy of that church, by dividing the country into parishes, and by exercising the power of collating and inducting into these parishes such Episcopal Rectors as they thought fit.' In New Jersey, after the surrender of the Charter, when the Colony came directly under the royal authority in 1702, liberty of conscience was \n-o- claimed in favor of all except Papists and Quakers ; but as the latter were required to take oaths as quali- fications for holding office, or for acting as jurors or witnesses injudicial proceedings, they, of course the great mass of the population, were practically dis- franchised. But the story of the arbitrary measures taken by the Governor of this Colony [New Jersey], Lord Cornbury, to exclude from office or the control of public affairs all except those who conformed to the Church of England is too well known to need to be retold here. In ^Maryland the English Church was established in IG'.'ii. and one of the first acts of the newly organized Province was to disfranchise those very Catholics and their children by whom the doctrine of religious liberty had been established in the law of 164!). In Carolina after the fanciful and impracticable Ccmstitution devised for it by the cele- brated philosopher, John Locke, had been given up, by which the English Church had been established, and endowed in the Colony, the Church feeling was so strong, and the determination to secure its supremacy so unyielding, that an Act was passed in 1704 requir- ing all members of the Assembly to take the sacra- ment according to the rites of the Chui'cli of England. Georgia, following the example of her elder sisters, gave free exercise of religion to all except Papists, and such rights in this respect as any native born Englishman at that time possessed; a grant, as we have seen, of very doubtful value to English non- conformists, then ruled by the tender mercies of the Toleration Act.- The result of this review is to show that in all the Colonies named except, perhaps, Rhode Island, liberty of worship was the rule, ex- cepting, of course, in the case of Roman Catholics. Throughout the Colonies, at the beginning of the eighteenth century, the man who did not conform to the established religion of the Colony, whether it was Congregationalism in New England, or the Episcopal form elsewhere, was not in the same position in regard to the enjoyment of either civil or religious rights as he who did conform. If he were a Roman Catholic ' .K\\ this was done luidor the " Ministry .\ct " above mentioned, and its amendments, An .\ct which wa.s not repealed till 1784, one year after the establishment of Independence. It was the binding law of New York from 1(593 to 1784, full ninety years. = 1. W. and M., Ch. 18. Exempting dissentei-s from the penalties of certain laws against non-conformity, but requiring an oath against Iransnbstantiiition, and of allegiance to William and Mary. he was everywhere wholly disfranchised. For him there was not even the legal right of public worship. If he were a Protestant differing in his creed from the type of Protestantism adopted by the rulers, although he could freely celebrate in nearly all the Colonies his peculiar form of worship, he was nevertheless ex- cluded from any share in public affairs. He could neither vote nor hold ofiice,^ and he was forced to contribute to the support of a religious ministry whose teachings he in his heart abhorred. And this condition of things, extraordinary as it seems to us now, had not been brought about by any conscious arbitrary despotism on the part of the rulers, but was the work of good but narrow-minded men who were simply following out the uniform practice of the Christian world, and who no doubt honestly thought that in so acting they were doing the highest service by obeying the will of God." * The Ministry Act of New York was simply the carrying out as far as it was possible of the Commis- sion and the " Instructions " which Governor Fletcher had received from the King. These " Instructions " to the Governors of the British Crown Colonies, which were delivered by the English Sovereigns in writing to each Governor when first appointed, were the Con- stitutions of the Colonies under Avhich they were ruled by their Governors, just as the Charters from the same Sovereigns were the Constitutions of the Char- tered Colonies under which they were governed. Both were given in the exercise of the Royal Prerog- ative, and were in fact grants of it. The charters could not be revoked except for cause as long as they were lived up to and obeyed. The "In- structions" were the Royal directions from the King for the governing of his Province, and could be altered, varied, or revoked at his pleasure. In point of fact they were never changed in the time of each Governor, except to meet some exigency not cOntempleted when they were issued. Upon the appointment of a new Governor, either new " In- structions " were given to him, or, if those of the preceding Governor were satisfactory to the Province and the King, he was simply directed to carry them out as his own. The Instructions of Charles II. to Sir Richard Nicolls the first English Governor of New York, dated the 28d of April, 16C4, five months prior to the capture of New York from the Dutch, directed him to avoid giving umbrage to the people of Massa- chusetts, where he was to stop on his way to New York, by being present at their devotions in their churches, but the document thus continues, " though wee doe suppose and thinke it very fit that you carry with you some learned and discreete Chaplaine, ortho- dox in his judgment and practice, who in your owne ' New York was an e.xception to this, as to all religions, except the Roman Catholic. *IX. Fenua. Mag. Hist., 372-376. 104 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. fainilyes will reade the book of Common Prayer and performe your devotion according to ye forme established in the Church of England, excepting only in wearing the surplesse which haveiug never bin seen in those countryes may conveniently be for- borne att this tyme." ^ The Instructions of Lovelace the second Governor seem not to have been preserved, but he says in a letter of the 28th of August, 1668, to Secretary Lord Arlington : " I have since happily accomphisht my voyadge and am now invested in the charge of His Royal Highnesses teritorys being the middle position of the two distinct factions, the Papist and Puritane." In the time of Thomas Dongan, afterward the Earl of Limerick, the third Governor of New York, Charles the Second died, the Duke of York succeeded as James the Second, and his Lord Proprietorship merging in the Crown, New York thenceforward be- came a Royal Province, governed directly by the King through his appointed Governor. Though a Roman Catholic himself, and his Governor, Dongan, was of the same religion, James, as King, acted promj)tly, and without hesitation, and gave Dongan the most pointed, and strongest possible, " Instructions " to establish the Church of England in New York. A King of England by the law of England could not do otherwise. But the thoroughness of James's action under the circumstances is very surprising. His " In- structions" to Dongan bear date May the 29th, 1686. They not only established the Church of England, but also placed it under the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the Archbishop of Canterbury, and are in these words : "31. You shale take especial care that God Al- mighty bee devoutly and duely served throughout yo' Government: the Book of Common Prayer as it is now established, read each Sunday and Holyday, and the Blessed Sacrament administred according to the Rites of the Church of England. You shall bee careful that the Churches already builtt here shall bee well and orderly kept and more built as y'' Colony shall, by Gods blessing bee improved. And that be- sides a competent maintenance to be assigned to y" Minister of each Church, a convenient House bee built at the Comon charge for each Minister, and a com- petent Proportion of Land assigned him for a Glebe and exercise of his Industry. " 32. And you are to take care that the Parishes bee so limited & settled as you shall find most con- venient for ye accomplishing this good work. " 33. Our will and pleasure is that noe minister be preferred by you to any Ecclesiastical Benefice in that our Province without a Certificat from ye most Rev- erend the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury of his being conformable to ye Doctrine and Discipline of the Church of England, and of a good life and conversa- tion. I III. N. Y. Col. Hist. 49. - Ibia. 174. 34. And if any person preferred already to a Bene- fice shall appear to you to give scandal either by his Doctrine or Manners, you are to use the best means for y' removal of him ; and to supply the vacancy in such manner as we have directed. And alsoe our pleasure is, that, in the direction of all Church Aflairs, the Minister bee admitted into the respective vestrys. And to th° end the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of the said Archbishop of Canterbury may take place in that our Province as farr as conveniently may bee. Wee doe think fitt that you give all countenance and encouragement in y" exercise of the same ; excepting only the Collating to Benefices, granting licenses for Marriage, and Probate of Wills, which wee have re- served to you our Gov' & to y' Commander-in-chiet for the time being. " 36. And you are to take especial care, that a Table of Marriages established by ye Canons of the Church of England, bee hung up in all Orthodox chiu-ches and duly observed. "37. And y('U are to take especial care that Books of Homilys & Books of the 39 Articles of y'' Church of England bee disposed of to every of y'' .said churches, and that they bee only kept and used therein. " 38. And wee doe further direct that noe School- master bee henceforth permitted to come from Eng- land & to keep school within our Province of New York, without the license of the said Archbishop of Canterbury ; And that noe other person now there, or that shall come from other parts, bee admitted to keep school without your license first had." In the face of these direct, positive " Instructions"' of James II. to Governor Dongan there can be no ques- tion that the King in the legal exercise of his power as Kiilg, as soon as it was possible after he came to the throne of England established the Church of England in his former Proprietary, and now Royal, Province of New York, subject only to the articles of surrender of 1664, of 1674, and the treaty of Breda in 1667, which guaranteed the continued existence therein of its for- mer established Church of Holland with all its rights of faith, discipline, and property; and subject also as far as Suffolk County was concerned, to the pre-existing Congregational Church of Connecticut as there prac- tically established under the authority of the General Court of that Colony. If the latter was a legal estab- lishment under the laws or charter of Connecticut prior to the Dutch surrender in 1664 and the treaty of Breda in 1667, then the King of England was legally bound to maintain it as such. He did immedi- ately after the first Dutch surrender, by his com- missioners make a change in the civil condition of Suffolk County by deciding that Long Island, of which it was then, as it is now, the eastern end, was not a part of Connecticut, but was a part of New York. He appointed civil officers in Suffolk County, and instituted there the complete civil and military jurisdiction of New York, but made no change what- ever in its ecclesiastical condition, which continued THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 105 precisely the same as wheu it claimed to be a part of Counecticut. The above-cited provisions of the Instructions of King James to Uoveruor Dongan relative to the Church of England in New York were continued by William III., Aune, George I., George II., and George III. in their dilt'erent " lustructions " to the difiereut Governors of New York they successively appointed, with little or no variation in language and none in etl'ect.' Occasionally a new one was added, as in the Instructions to Lord Cornbury when he was appoint- ed Governor by Ciueeii Anne, dated the '2%h of Jan- ary, 1702, in which, clause No. G3, is in these words ; — "You are to inquire whether there beany minister with- in yourGovernment who preaches and -administers the Sacrament in any orthodox church or chapel without being in due orders and to give an account thereof to the Bishop of London." The use of the word " Minis- ' ter" in these various Instructions is shown by the con- text of them, and markedly in this additional one to Cornbury, to mean and to designate clergymen only of the Church of England. And the same thing may be said of the term " Orthodox Church,'" for by law neither the King nor the Bishop could acknowledge, or have any ecclesiastical jurisdiction over, any Minis- ter or any Church which did not belong to the Church of England. No other church and no other other clergyman could be, in the eye of the law, either of England or New York, orthodox. King William, as King, formally apjtroved the Ministry Act of 1()!)8 passed by the Legislature of New York, and as by the law of England he could not acknowl- edge any other church as orthodox or any other Ministers, as Ministers, except those of the Church of England, it follows that the words and terms of that act referred to the Church of England and only to that church. That this is the sense, and the only legal sense, in which these words were then used, is shown by an opinion of Sir Edward Northey, the At- torney-General, in 1705, asked by the Board of Trade anil Plantations, upon the grant of ecclesiastical power in the Patent of Maryland, which closes with these words, "and the consecrations of chapels ought to be, flw in England, by Orthodox Ministers only." - No English Governor hiis been more denounced for hisaction in regard to the church of England than Lord Cornbury, and his official acts concerning it have been abused in almost every possible way. His action has been taken as the result of pure bigotry, and he termed a bigot, while he was merely carrying out the Instruc- tions he had sworn to support and maintain. His "Instructions" arc therefore here given at length, taken from the original Instrument which with his Commission under the hand and seal of Queen .\nne, are now in the hands of a geutlemau in New York. 'In the 3d, 4th, 5th and 6th volumes of the "Col. Hist, of N. Y." near- ly all of thorn may he founil. sciialniers' opinions, 42. The italics are the writer's, and not in the original. From the Instructions to Lord Cornbury, dated January 29, 1702-3. 60. Y'ou shall take especial care that God Almighty be devoutedly and duly .served throughout your Gov- ! ernmcnt, the Book of Common prayer, as by Law es- tablished, read each Sunday and Holy day, and the blessed Sacrament administered according to the rifes of the Church of England ; You shall be carefull that the Churches already built there be well and orderly kept, and that more be built as the Colony shall by God's blessing be improved, and that besides a Com- petent maintenance to be assigned to the Minister of each Orthodox Church, a convenient house be built at the Common charge for each Minister, andacompetent proportion of Land assigned him for^a Glebe and exer- cise of his Industry. And you are to take care that the parishes be so limited and setled, as you shall find most convenient lor the accomplishing this good work. 61. You are not to present any Minister to any Ec- clesiasticall Benefice in that Our Province without a certificate from the right reverend Father in God the Bishop of Loudon, of his being conformable to the Doc- trine and Discipline of the Church of England, and of a good life and conversation, and if any person preferred already to a Benefice shall appear to you to give Scandall, either by his doctrine or Manners, You are to use the best means for tlie removal of him, and to Supply the Vacancy in Such manner as AVcc have directed. 62. You are to give order forthwith (if the same be not already done) that every Orthodox Minister with- in your Government, be one of the Vestry in his res- l)ective parish, and that no Vestry be held without him, except in case of Sickness, or that after notice of a Vestry Sunimon'd he omitt to come. 63. You are to enquire whetherthere be any Minister within your Government, who preaches and adminis- ters the Sacrament in any Orthodox Church or Chap- pell without being in due Orders, and to give an account thereof to the said Bishop of London. 64. And to the end the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of the Said Bishop of London may take place in that province So farr as conveniently may be, Wee do think fitt, that you give all Countenance and encour- agement to the exercise of the Same. Excepting only the Collating to Benefices, granting Lyceiises for Marriages and probate of Wills, which Wee have re- served to you Our Governour and to the Commander- in-chief of Our Said Province for the time being. 65. Wee do further direct that no Schoolmaster be henceforth permitted to come from England, and to keep Schoole within Our Province of New York, without the Lycense of the said Bishop of London, and that no other person now there, or that shall come from other parts, be admitted to keep School without your Lycense first obtained. 66. And you are to take especial care that a Table of Marriages, established by the Canons of the Church 106 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of England be hung up in every orthodox Church and duly observed, and you are to endeavour to get a Law past in tlie Assembly of that province (if not already done) for the strict observation of the Said Table. 79. And you are also with the assistence of the Council and Assembly to find out the best means to facilitate and encourage the conversion of Negroes and Indians to the Christian Religion ; more especi- ally you are to use your endeavours with the Assem- bly that they make provision for the maintenance of some Ministers to inhabit amongst the five Nations of Indians in order to instruct them, and also to pre- vent their being Seduced from their Allegiance to us, by French i)riests and Jesuits. In the instance not only of Cornbury but of each (lOvernor, it must be remend)ered that these " Instruc- tions " were, not merely directions to him personally, but were the binding constitutions of the Province in all things civil, military, and ecclesiastical, during each Governor's period of office. They were the law of the land both for the (Jovernor and the jieople, which was to be obeyed by both. They were laid down, and set forth, by each Sovereign, in his Kingly capacity, under the law of England for the govern- ment of his or her Province of New York. This fact has not been considered by American historians, or by English ones either, in treating of the civil and re- ligious, — especially the religious — aspects and condi- tions of the Royal Provinces in America in general, and of New York in particular. What then was the Kingly authority in these re- spects? Whence came the monarch's legal right to govern his Royal Provinces by " Instructions " to his representatives the Governors? AVhat were the powers then vested in the Crown by the laws of Eng- land ? The attributes of the Monarch of England, sove- reignty, perfection,^ and perpetuity,'' which are inhe- rent in, and constitute, his ])olitical capacity, prevail in every j)art of the territories subject to the English Crown. " In such political capacity as King he is possessed of a share of legislation, is the head of the Church, generalissimo throughout his dominions, and is alone entitled to make war and peace.' But in coun- tries which, though dependent on the British Crown, have different local laws, as for instance the Colonies the minor ))rerogatives and interests of the Crown must be regulated and governed by the peculiar law of the place. But if such law be silent on the subject," or if the place has become by conquest or cession a Colony or Province of the Crown, having never before been possessed by the English nation, "it would appear that the prerogative of the King in his political ca- pacity as chief of the State, as established by English 1 This is expressed by tlie well-known legal axiom " The King can do no wrong." 2 This is expressed by that other well-known axiom "The King is dead, long live the King." 3 Chalmers' Opinions, LOO. law, prevails in every respect."* "When a country is obtained by conquest or treaty the King possesses an exclusive prerogative power over it, and may en- tirely change or new-model, the whole, or part, of its laws, and form of government, and may govern it in all respects by regulations framed by himself, subject only to the Articles or Treaty on which the country is surrendered or ceded, which are always sacred and inviolable according to their true intent and mean- ing.'' Lord Mansfield thus most fully and suc- cinctly lays down tlie law on this subject, citing New York as an example. " A country coiKpiered by the British arms becomes a dominion of the King in right of his crown. . . . After the con- (juest of New York, in which most of the old Dutch inhabitants remained. King CJharles 2d changed the form of their Constitution and ])olitical government, by granting it to the duke of York, to hold of his crown under all the regulations contained in the letters patent." " It is not to be wondered at," con- tinues the Great Chief Justice of Elngland, "that an adjudged case in point lias not been produced. No (piestion was ever started before but that the King has a right to a legislative authority over a conquered country ; it was never denied in Westminster Hall ; it was never questioned in parliament."® This decision was made in the Court of King's Bench in 1774 — a century after the practical a}>i)lication of, and action under, its principle, by Charles the Second, and .lames the Second, and William & Mary in their Province of New York, to say nothing of Queen Anne and her successors. There can therefore be no question as to the law itself, or the legality of the power by which the Sovereigns of England, by their " Commissions" and "Instructions" to their (rovernors, established the Church of England in their American Pi ovince of New York. Now what was a " Province" in law? This term, in Latin Frovincia, was first used by the Romans to designate a portion of territory outside of Italy, which they had subjected by conquest. Its general use, however, says Chief Justice Stokes of the Colony of Georgia, is "to denote the divisions of a Kingdom or State, as they are usually distinguished by the ex- tent of their civil or ecclesiastical jurisdiction. With us. [the English people] a Province signifies — 1st. An out-country governed by a De])uty or Lieutenant; and2dly,Tlie circuit of an Archbishop's jurisdiction. When the British settlements in America are spoken of in general, they arc called the Colonies or Planta- tions. If it is a Government on the Continent [in con- tradistinction to the West India Islands] where the King api)oints the Governor it is usually called a Province, as the Province of Quebec ; but a Planta- tion in which the Governor was elected by the iiihab- * Chitty's Prerogatives of the Crown, Ih and 26. 5 Ibid. 29 ; Cowpor's Bcp. 208. "Hall V. Camiibell, Cowper's Keport«, 208, 211. Calvin's Case 4 Coke's Keii. 1. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 107 itants, (under a charter of incorporation from the King) was usually called a Colony, as the Colony of Connecticut." ' Thus the very name was expressive of the character of the King's power by virtue of which he erected and established in New York Manors, Parishes, Churches and a General Assembly. Sir William IJlackstone in speaking of the American Provinces, says, " In the Provincial Establishments (commonly called King's Governments) their constitu- tion dei)ended on the respective commissions issued by the Crown to the Governors, and the Instructions which usually accompanied these commissions ; under the authority of which Provincial Assemblies were constituted with the power of nuiking local ordinances, not repugnant to the laws of England." ^ It is clear, and beyond question, that the very authority by which New York was granted the right to possess and elect a representative Assembly of its own people, a priv- ilege granted to it by William and Mary in IG'Jl, which continued from that time without interrui)tionas long as it remained a British Province, sprang from precisely the same source, as the establishment of the Church of England within its limits — the Commission and Kiini's Iitifl ructions to his Governors ; To say nothing of the lirst granting of the right to elect and hold Assemblies by James II. himself as Duke of York to Governor Dongan in 1(583, eleven years be- Ibre ; which assemblies sat for three years, and the laws which thuy passed in those years, still in exist- ence, are the earliest English statutes of New York ; and which assemblies were called and held solely by virtue of James's "Commission " and " Instructions " to Governor Dongan. There is another point of importance in this con- nexion. Every (Jommission to every Governor from every Sovereign of New York, contained in it a clause, delegating to him the power of collation to church benefices, a power under the law of England which could be exercised only in the Church of England. It was in these words, " And we do by these j)resents authorize and impower you to collate any person or persons to any churches, chapels, or other ecclesiastical benefices within our said province and territories as aforesaid, as often as any of them shall happen to be void." ^ This was the delegation by the King of his iiwn power as Ordinary. This word derived from the (.'ivil Law primarily signifies one who, of his own right, has authority to take cognizance of causes. In the common law it is usually applied to the Bishop of a Diocese, who only could certify to ecclesiastical and spiritual acts in his own diocese. The King as the Head of the Church jtossessed this temporal right throughout his whole Kingdom, and could delegate it. The Bisho|) could only delegate his power in temporal ecclesiastical matters in his own diocese. ' Constitutions ol' the British Colonics in Ainei ica, 2. - 1 Blackstone's, Comm. 108. •^Stokes's Cons, of the Am. Colonies, 158. And see the diftereut Com- luissiou!) themselves in the volumes of the Colonial llistory. As there were no dioceses as such in the British American Colonies, the King delegated the power of collating to benefices here to his different Governors as his personal representatives. From the same source came their power to grant probate of wills, and mar- riage licenses. The spiritual supervision of the Church of Eng- land in America, was, as we have seen, first com- mitted by King James to the Archbishop of Canter- bury. Later it was deemed most convenient to attach this supervision to the Bishop of London, who appointed "Commissaries" in ditierent parts of America, to oversee the clergy in their different districts, in such matters not purely episcopal, as a Bishop did in his Diocese in England. As there were then no Dioceses in America, the King in the different Instructions to the Governors, directed them to retain these powers, of collation, to benefices, of granting probate of wills, and of licens- ing marriages to themselves. This was in virtue both of the King's Legislative power, and his power as Head of the church. Perhaps nothing has been, or is, more misunderstood, and that very honestly, in America than the Royal Supremacy of the Church of England. Of course, it cannot be treated at length here. We can only state the popular idea of it, and then show what it really is. The popular idea of it in this country is, that the Sovereign of England was, and is, the head of the Church of England in spirit- ual as well as temporal matters, and is the superior of the Archbishops and Bishops in all that relates to their offices as such, and is governed by his or her own ideas of what is true and right in matters of doctrine and discipline. Of course this is only the common idea, but it is held by many people of education and general intelligence nevertheless, who are, and are usually considered, well informed. A recent writer after citing and examining the legal authorities, and writers of England since the Re- formation, on this subject, says, " These numerous authorities repeat again and again the same ojjinions touching the supremacy of the Crown. According to them the Royal Supremacy is simply and strictly a temporal or civil power over all causes and persons in things temporal, and over spiritual persons and causes as far as their temporal or civil accidents are concerned. But it has no inherent spiritual power as such, nor ecclesiastical authority, whatsoever, the spirituality alone possessing the power of the Keys." * Lord Selborne the learned and eminent Lord High Chancellor in Mr. Gladstone's late Government says, " The Sovereign has not (as some suppose) a temporal supremacy in temj)oral things and a spiritual suprem- acy in spiritual things; it is one undivided temj)(>ral supremacy, extending to all persons, causes, and things, whether ecclesiastical or civil, of which the law of the land takes cognizance, and ujjon which that law has * Fuller's Appellate Jurisdiction of the Crown, 186. 108 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. operation. It does not and it can not extend to tiie province of religious belief, or to moral and spiritual obligations recognized by the conscience as springing from a source higher than the laws of the land." ' That most eloquent and able prelate, Wilberforce Bishop of Winchester, when Bishop of Oxford, in a debate in the House of Lords, in which this subject was brought up, thus spoke out : — " he did not believe that it was a correct or constitutional interpretation of that supremacy, to say that the occupant of the throne should settle in his or her individual capacity, articles of faith or any other questions whatever. He was sure that the exalted personage who at present occupied the throne would be herself the first to re- pudiate so unconstitutional a doctrine. The Supre- macy of the Crown meant nothing more than this, that the Crown had the ultimate Appeal in all questions ecclesiastical and civil, deciding such questions not of herself, but through her proper constitutional agents." And Mr. Gladstone himself writes, in his Letter on the R.oyal Supremacy ; — I contend that the Crown did not claim by statute, either to be by right, or to become by convention, the source of that Kind of action which was committed by the Saviour to the Apostolic church, whether for the enactment of laws or for the administration of its discipline ; but the claim was that all the canons of the church, and all its judicial proceedings, inasmuch as they were to form parts respectively of the laws and the adminis- tration of justice in the Kingdom, should run only with the assent and Sanction of the Crown." This full statement has been written to show, that in their Province on the Hudson, the Sovereigns of Eng- land in virtue of their political, ecclesiastical, and legislative, capacities, as Sovereigns under the laws of England, through their direct " Commissions " and " Instructions" under their own signs-manual, legally established and maintained in that Province, by pre- cisely the same legal instruments and methods, the same form of civil government and the same form of religious belief, that was established in England, as far forth as both could possibly be there done, consistently with the Surrenders and Treaty by which the Province became a possession of their Crown. And it also shows, that historically, the existence in New York, of a General Assembly of elected representatives of the people, of Manors, of the Church of England with its Parishes, and taxation of all inhabitants for the sup- port of its Ministers and churches, had one and all ex- actly the same origin, and were equally the legitimate results, of the legitimate action, of its legitimate Sovereign authority, the monarchs of England. 12. The Manors and the County in their Mutual relations, with the Origin and Organization of the latter. The six Manors of the County of Westchester, in 1 Letter of Lord Selborne, then Sir Roundell Palmer, Atty. Gen., of 30 Dec. 1850, in Plymouth Herald of 11th Jan. 1851. Fuller, app. B. 251. the order of their erection, were ' Fordham ' in No- vember 1671, ' Pelham ' in October 1687, ' Philipsbor- ough ' in June 1693, ' Morrisania ' in May 1697, ' Cort- landt ' in June 1697, and ' Scarsdale' in March 170L As the 'Manor of Cortlandt' comprised the whole northern part of the County from the Hudson to the Connecticut line, and was ten miles in width, it will be described first, then following the order of location of the others down the eastern side of the count}' to its southern extremity, ' Scarsdale,' ' Pelham,' ' Morri- sania,' and ' Fordham,' will be suceessively treated, then ' Philipsborough,' which comprised the entire western portion of the County bordering upon the Hudson as far north as the south line of the Manor of Cortlandt, and extended eastwardly to the Bronx River which runs through the centre of the County from north Co south and was the boundary between it and the manors of the east side. The general nature and history of Manors in a legal point of view, the origin of the ancient mano- rial system of England, its tenures, and the modern manorial system of New York with its incidents, and tenure introduced by the English upon its cap- ture from the Dutch, have been described. But be- fore treating of each of the Manors separately, the general Province and County Jurisdiction as it affected the Manors as a whole, and the origin and formation of the County itself will be shown. The authority of the Governor, as Governor, of the Governor and Council in the Executive capacity of the latter, and of the Governor, Council in its legis- lative capacity, and the General Assembly, the three together forming the Legislature of the Province, ex- tended throughout the manors of New York in all respects save one. Neither of these authorities could in any way whatever alter, change, abridge, or in any way interfere with the franchises, rights, powers, priv- ileges, and incidents, vested in any Lord of a Manor by his Manor-Grant. The Lords might not choose, or desire, to exercise any one or more of the fran- chises, rights, powers, privileges, and incidents of their Manors. This was a matter in their own discretion, but none of them could become void by non-user, nor could the Province authorities of any grade modify them in any way. If the Lords preferred, or had no objection, to have any local duties, legal acts, or offices, exercised by justices of the peace, assessors, consta- bles, and other minor officers, either chosen by their tenants alone, or by their tenants in connection with the inhabitants, freeholders of any adjoining non- Manorial lands, this could be done by an act of the Provincial Legislature. But no act of such a nature could be passed against their wishes. Hence there are to be found many acts of the kind alluded to in the Colony laws. The jurisdiction of the " Supreme Court," of the "Inferior Court of Common Pleas "and of the Court of Sessions, extended to all lands whether Manorial or non Manorial. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 109 So too, in the matter of elections, the inhabitants of all the Manors, (except that of Cortlaiult which had ii representative of its own as a franchise of its Manor- (irant) united with the people of the non-Manorial lauds in the choice of jMeuibers of Assembly for the County. The i)ower of the High Sheriff of the County, who was always a gentleman, was appointed by the Gov- ernor, and served without pay, as in England, was as complete and thorough in the Manors as out of them. The fees of the othce, which were vastly lighter in proportion, than those of elected Sheriffs now, went after being reported to, and scrutinized by the High Sheriff, to the Undersheriff and the one or two deputies, who were all that the business of the Coun- ty required in the Colonial era. If any overcharge or oppression, was attempted, a complaint properly proven, to the High Sheriff himself, was all that was necessary to right the wrong. Again, in military matters, the military organiza- tion of the County was effected in the County as a whole without regard to the Manors. Sometimes, however, their names were given to the companies enrolled within their limits. A Colonel for the County commissioned by the Governor, commanded the one regiment, which was formed of the enrolled companies within its limits, all of which were infantry. Toward the close of the Colonial period, when the population had increased, a Light Horse organization of one or two troops for the County in general was formed, the Commander of which was a Lieutenant-Colonel, or Colonel. The inhabitants of the Manors were enrolled in l)oth pre- cisely as were those of the rest of the County. The third act passed by the first Assembly under William and Mary in 1691, provided for the annual election in each town of "a certain Freeholder" "to super vize and examine the Publick and Necessary Charge of each respective County, which persons so duely chosen shall elect and constitute a certain Treasurer for each respective County." It also pro- vided for the election of two Freeholders in each town as Assessors. This was the origin in New York of County Assessors, Supervisors, and Treasurers.' Only Freeholders could be electors, and the second Act of lt>91, defines a Freeholder to be, "every one who shall have Forty shillings jicr annum (N. Y. Currency) in Freehold." - And the same act apportioned to Westchester County two Members of Assembly. In the second year of Queen Anne, eleven years later, this third act of ItiOl was re-enacted in an enlarged and amended form. Its provisions are worth (juoting in full as showing the early internal economy civil and political of the County and how all interests manorial and non-manorial moved in harmony and unison. Its words are " That there be elected and chosen once every year, in each respective Town within thisProv- iiri. Bradford 6. !ilbid.*3. ince, by the Freeholders and Inhabitants thereof, one of their Freeholders and Inhabitants, to compute, as- certain, examine, oversee, and allow the Contingent public and necessary charge of each .County, and that each anil every Freeholder in any Manor, Liberty, .lurisdiction. Precinct, and out-Plantation, shall have liberty to joyn his or their Vote with the next adjacent town in the County where such Inhabitant shall dwell, for a choice of Supervisor (except the Manor of Uensselaerswyck who shall have liberty to chuse a Supervisor for the same Mannor). And also, that there shall be in each Town, Mannor, and Pre- cinct, by the Freeholders and Inhabitants hereof, in every respective County annually two Assessors, and one Collector, which Supervizors, Assessors, and Col- lectors, shall be annually chose in every Town on the first Tuesday in April, or such days as is appointed bj' their Charters or Patents, which Supervizors so chosen shall annually meet at the County Town in each respective County, on the first Tuesday in October, and at such other time and times as the said Super- vizors shall judge and find necessary and Convetiient," to j)erform the duties of their office.^ In 1722 the number of Supervizors was increased in the County of Westchester by a special Act, passed on the 6th of November in that year, as the former Act which applied to the whole Province, worked unc(iually in some respects in Westchester. It pro- vided " for such Mannor or Mannors as (in their Rates and Taxes) have usually been or hereafter nuiy be divided into two or more Divisions. That a Super- vizor may in like manner be chosen for each of such Divisions by the Freeholders and Inhabitants there- of. And wliere the said Inhabitants shall omit to make such annual choice in any of the said Divisions, or in such Mannor or Mannors, where not above twenty Inhabitants do dwell or reside, the Owner or Owners of such Mannor or Mannors, or of such Division thereof as aforesaid, or their Stewards or De[)uties, shall be deemed and esteemed the Supervizors thereof respectively, and have the same Powers, to all intents, constructions, and purposes, whatsoever as those chosen by virtue of the Act above mentioned.^ The act of 1703 called for the annual meeting of the Supervisors at the " County-town," which then was the Town of Westchester. In 1745 the popula- tion had so much increased as to make a chiinge to another part of the County desirable, therefore an act was passed on the 27th of November in that year changing the place of meeting as " much for the ease of the people," which provided that " the an- nual meeting shall be at the School House in the Town of Rye," and that the majority shall have power to adjourn to such time and place as they see proper.^ The next change did not occur till 1773, twenty- 8 UI. Bradford, 5.3. * III. Bradford 212. ^ I Vau Scbaak'a Laws, ch. 801. 110 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. eight years later. Then another act was passed chang- ing the annual meeting of the Supervisors " to the Court-House at Whiteplains on account of the in- crease of inhabjtants of the northerly part of said County," with a like liberty to adjourn to such time and place as they should please. ^ This building was the first Court-House in Whiteplains which was burned by the Americans a day or two after the battle of Whiteplains in 1776. It stood on the same site as its successor, the old wooden Court-House on Main St., which was pulled down after the erection of the present handsome stone edifice on Rail-Koad Avenue. Another fact of interest which shows the upward march of population of the people, both of the manors and the towns is the change in the place holding the County elections which it j^roduced. The Colonial elections, it must be remembered, were not by ballot as ours are now, but like those in Eng- land, viva voce. The term " hustings " was, and is used in England to describe the place of election, but though the thing was the same in New York, the word does not seem to have been in use here. At least no instance of its employment has been met with by the writer. The first law on the subject passed in 1()99 directed that the Sherifi' " shall hold his Court for the same Election at the 7nost publick and usual Place of Elec- tion within City or County where the same has most usually been made." This was usually at West- chester before it was chartered as a " Boroughtown " and after that at Eastcliester. But in 1751, on the 25th of November the place was changed by a s])eci:il act of the Legislature, ^ which is of such curious interest for its reasons and choice of a new place, and its stern enforcement of that choice that it is here given in full. " Whereas the County of Westchester is very exten- sive, and the extreme parts thereof to the Northward, have of late years become very populous ; and where- as the Elections for Representatives to serve in the General Assembly for the said County, have, from the first settlement of the said County, been held at the Southern Part of said County; it now becomes ex- tremely inconvenient for the Freeholders of the Upper or Northern Parts thereof, which are now be- come, by far, the most numerous, to attend those Elections at so great a distance from their respect- ive Habitations : For Remedy whereof for the Fu- ture ; I. Be it Enacted by his Excellency the Governor, the Council, and the General Assembly and by Authority of the Same, That in All Elections hereafter to be Made in the said County of Walc or Barter in Gross or by Retail, at the Times, Hours, and Seasons, that Governours or Rulers of the said respective Fairs, for the Time being, shall pro- claim and appoint." The Governor was also obliged to set ai)art a certain space or " Open Place " for all the lun-se kind, where they could be sold, and \mi a person in charge as " Toll-tiatherer " who was to take " Nine pence" a day for every animal brought there and sold ; and who was to put down in writing in a book, the names, sir-names, and dwelling places of all the said Parties, and the Colour, with one special mark at least, of every such Horse, Mare, Gelding, or Colt," sold, bartered, or exchanged under a penalty of a fine of Forty Shillings. The "Toll-gatherer, was obliged the next, day after the Fair" to deliver the said book to the "Governour," who was to make a note therein of all the number of all the animals, so sold &c. at the Fair, and subscribe his name to it, for which entry of such sale Ac. he was "to take for Toll of the same the sum of Nine pence, the one half to be paid by the Buyer, the other half by the Seller." It is evident from this that the old Westchester men meant that their dealings in horses at their Fairs should be as honest as the nature of the business would permit, whatever may been the practical result. Such were the County Fairs of the Colonial Days, and to them went regularly great nnnd)ers of peof)lc with their stock and produce, from the iManors, Great Patents, and villages of all Westchester. And there too went as in more modern days the county politicians of all kinds who of course attended, as their successors do now, solely for the good of their country. In this connection it is proper to state the origin and organization of the County itself ius such. Under the Dutch there was no county organization, each of the settlements then in existence, and the Patroonship of Coleudonck, were simply mere parts of the Province of New Netherland entirely independ- ent of each other. When the Dutch surrendered New Netherland in l(i()4, one of the first acts of the first English Governor Richard Nicolls was to re-name it and its parts in the English language in the English manner. This he did by using mainly the name and titles of the Duke of York, who was Lord Proprietor of the Province, 112 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. aud by whom he was appointed the Chiefof the Commis- sion to capture it, and then to command it as its first Governor. It was a very natural thing for him to do, but its result has been to fasten forever on what is now the chiefest city of the Western hemispliere, that most inadequate name — New York. As the entire region surrounding Old York in England, from which the Duke took his title, forms the County there called "Yorkshire; '' and as it is one of the largest in Eng- land, it was early for convenience sake divided into three Districts, termed in the j)eculiar Dialect of that region, Ridings, which from their position were termed the East, West, aud North, Ridings of Yorkshire. This exami)le Governor Nicolls faithfully followed. He called Long Island, Staten Island and Westchester, as the region nearest to " New," York, " Yorkshire," and divided it into three " Ridings, the " East," "West," and "North," "Ridings. The region now Suffolk County formed the " East Riding ; " Staten Is- land, Kings County, and the town of Newtown in Queens County, formed the " West Riding;" there- mainder of what is now Queens County, together with what is now We.^tchester County, being all the territory on the main, North of the Harlem River aud South of the Highlands, between the Sound and the Hudson, he called the " North Riding." As the portion of "the North Riding " on the main, Westchester County was legally and })0])ularly known till the year 1683. In that year it received its present name in an act of the first legislature of New York, which sat in the " Hall " of Fort James. This Assembly which there sat, wiis called by the exj)ress " Instructions" of the Duke of York by his Governor Thomas Dongan subsequently Earl of Limerick, and was the very first ever held in New York. This Act, passed on the 1st of November, 1()63, runs thus : " Haveing taken into Considerayon the necessity of divideing the ])rovinee into respective Countyes for the better governing and setleing Courts in the same. Bee It Enacted by the Governour, Coun- cell and Representatives, and by authority of the same That the said Province bee divided into twelve Coun- tyes as foUowoth : . . . The Countye of Westcheder to contain West and Eaxf Chester, Broii.v^ Land, (ford- ham, Anne Hooks Neck, Bich/il/ls, Minford'x Island and all the Land on the Maine to the Eastward of Ma?i- haftan's I.fland As farr as the Government Extends and the Yoncl-e7-s Land and Northwards along Hudsons River as farr as the High Lands." After describing all the "countyes" seriatim, the Act terminates with this clause, which first created English High Sheriflfs in New York : "And for as much there is a necessity for a High Sherifie in every County in this Province, Bee it therefore Enacted bv the Governour, Councell, and Representatives in Generall Assembly mett and by the Authority of the same, That there shall be I TliiK is the earliest instance the writer has found of the use of the woni "Bronx." " IJronkes his land" aud " Bronkcs' Land" and lironkes River, were the first terms used. yearly and Every yeare an High Sheriflfe constituted and Commissioned for Each County And that Each Sheriffe may have his under Sheritfe Deputy or Dep- utyes." From 1683 to 1783, precisely one hundred years, the High Sheriffs existed, and so were they always designated. After the Revolution the prefix was dropped, the duties remained the same, however, except the holding of "Courts of election " was taken from them, and these officers themselves were appoint- ed by the State Governor. By the Constitution of 1821 they were made elective. A great mistake, for an officer clothed with a Sheriff"'s powers, of all others, should never be made eleciive. As its result we see the corruptions, extortions, and cruelties, which are known to every observant man, especially in the cities of the State. The Acts of the Legislatures from 1683 to 1685 in- clusive under the Duke of York as Lord Projjrietor, and of 1686 under him as James II. though existing in manuscript in the State, have, strange to say, never been printed by the Province, nor the State of New York, a fact disgraceful to both. This one dividing the Province into Counties, however, has by itself been printed in two or three historical works, the last of which is the xiiith volume of the Colonial History of New York, in which it is on the very last page. But to this hour it has never appeai'ed in any of the volumes of the Laws of New York. It was passed and signed by Governor Dongan on the 1st of No- vember 1683, and is entitled "An Act to divide this Province into Shires and Countyes." It was the third act of the first session of the first Legislature which ever sat within the limits of this State.'' Eight years later the first Assembly under William and Mary was called by Governor Sloughter. The first Act of the second session of this first Leg- islature under the " Instructions " of those Sover- eigns, held at the "Fort Hall" in September 1691, was a confirmation of the foregoing law, in the form of "An Act to divide this Province and Dependencies into Shires and Counties," •' with a preamble that it was enacted to prevent mistakes in the boundaries. The first clause provides " That the said Province be divided into twelve Counties, as followeth ; " and the third clause is, "The County of Westchester , io con- tain East and Westchester, Brnnkes Land, Fordham, Mannor of Pel ham, Miniford Island* (now City Island) and Richbill's Neck, (now De Lancey's Neck) and all the land on the Main to the Eastward of Manhat- tans Island, as far as the Government at present ex- tends, and the Yonckers hand. And Northwards along Hudsons River as far as the High Lands." The member chosen from Westchester County to this As- - It is here cited from a MS. copy of the original Manuscript of Ihe Dongan Liars, at Albany, in which it is found on page 12. ■m. Bradford's Laws, ed. 1710, p. 11. III. Bratlford s Laws, .m1. 172fi, p. 11. I. Livingston & Smith's Laws, C, II. Van Scha4ick, (i. * Westchester is named first in the original act, while it is second here. This is the only change that was made. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 113 sembly was John Pell, who was thus the first of a line of Assemblymen for the County which has existed from that day to this. In the Governor's Council at the time of this first A.ssembly as Members by Royal appointment, and as such, members of the Upper House which passed this Act, were Stephanas Van Cortlandt and Frederick Philipse, who were also of the Council under James as Duke and as King. Thus among the framers of the original act which created the County, who, so to s])eak, were present at its birth, and also at its confirmation were two members of fam- ilies, subsequently manorial, both of whom were the first Lords of the Manors of Philipsburgh and Cort- landt, neither of which had then been erected.' Who represented " The North Riding," in the As- sembly under the Duke of York is not known as the .lournals of all the Assemblies from lti83 to ItiSt) have been lost, and the names of the members of all of them have consequently gone iuto oblivion. No change whatever took place in the limits of Westchester after the act of 1691, until the "Equiva- lent J>ands," or "Oblong," was acquired by New York in the settlement of a boundary dispute with the Colony of Connecticut, on the 11th of May, 1731. This was a strip nearly two miles in width taken ofl the western side of Connecticut as far north as Mas- sachusetts, and ceded to New York in exchange for lands upon the Sound yielded to Connecticut. The extension of the counties of New Y'ork over this strip was not made by a Legislative act. Being an addi- tion to a Crown Colony, it was a new ac(iuisition by the Crown, and iis such its status was legally deter- minable by the King. Hence an "Ordinance" by the Governor of New Y'ork in the name of the King was issued on the 2!)th of August 1733 extending West- chester and the other counties aflected up to the new line between New Y'ork and Connecticut established by the agreement of the 14th of May 1731. As this Ordinance does not appear in any collection of New York Laws and Ordinances that the writer has seen nor in the two volumes of Historical Documents relat. ing to the Boundaries of New Y'ork, lately compiled and printed by ortler of the Regents of the University and is rare, it is here given in full from an original printed copy in the writer's possession. " An Ordinance for The Running and better Ascertaining the Partition Lines between the Counties of Wcs/- cheater, Diitc/iess, Albany and Ukter, and extending those Counties on the East side of Ifudsons River to the present Colony J>ine of Contierticuf. Geoiuje the Second, by the Grace of (rod, of Great Uritain, France, and Ireland, KlX(i, Defender of the Faith, &c. To all Our loving subjects inhabiting or being in our Province of Xew York, and to all others whom it doth or may concern, Greeting, 'Anil John Pcll who was tho nicnihcr for the County in 1691, and vote*! for tho art of t!uit year, was of that old family which then JWB- •easeil the Manor of I'elliani. 8 Whereas since the passing of the Acts of Assembly in the year 1683, and 1691, for dividing this Province and its Dependencies into Shires and Counties, there are several acquisitions of Lands by New Settlements, and otherwise, particularly the Equivalent Lands Sur- rendered by the Colony Connecticut, whereby this Colony has became larger than it was before. And Wlierenx notwithstanding that the Counties lying on the West side of Hudson'!^ River, were by the said Acts intended to be parted and divided by a West Line to be drawn from IfiidKon's River, at the respec- tive Stations and Places on the said River, mentioned in the said Acts, to the utmost extent of Our said Province on the West side of the said River ; and that the Counties lying on the East side of the said ffudsnii's River were likewise, by the said Acts, in- tended to be parted and divided by an lOast Line to be drawn from IIud.'i ff/ye/- at the respective Places and Stations on the said River, mentioned in the said Acts, to the utmost extent of Our said Province, on the East side of the said River, Yet the People living on the Borders of the said Counties, or some of them, for want of the said actual Running and Sur- veying of the said Partition Lines, protest sometimes that they are in one County, and sometimes within another, and on that pretence have committed several Abuses, and endeavored to elude all Process issuing from the Courts of Judicature, to the great hindrance of Justice, encouragement of Fugitives and Vaga- bonds, and to the disturbance of our Peace. And l^hereas, since the passing of the said Acts, the Chrhtian Settlements and Plantations, have been greatly extended into the Indian Counties, particu- larly in that part of the Province, which is called and esteemed the County of Albanij, from whence some Doubts have arose. Whether the Settlements made since the passing of the said Acts, are at present within the said County of Albany ? In order therefore, to remove such Doubts, remedy such mischiefs, and prevent the like Inconveneneies for the future. We do hereby Ordain and Direct, That the County of Westchester do and shall contain, All tlie Lands on the Main between Hudson's River and the Sound, to the Southward of an East Line drawn from a Red Cedar Tree on the North Side of a high Hill in the Highlands, commonly called and Known by the Name of Anthony's Nose, and running thence to the Colony Line, together with the adjacent Is- lands in the Sound. Now We do hereby further Ordain and Direct, That the South Bounds of the County of Albany, do and shall begin at the Mouth of of a Creek or Brook called the Sawyer's Creek, on the West side of I/ud- son's River, and from thence Shall run West to the utmost extent of our Province of New- York. And that on the East side of the said River, the said County of Albany shall begin at the Mouth of a Brook called Roeloff Jansen's Kill, and shall run thence Eastward to the utmost extent of our said 114 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Province ; and that the said County of Albany shall extend from the said South Bounds Northerly, on both sides Hudson's River, to the utmost extent ot Our said Province, and shall comprehend therein the Mannor of lAvirif/ston, the Maiinor of Raiidaerswijck- Schenectad II , and all the Towns, villagts, neighbours hoods and Christian Plantations, and all the Land, that now are, or at any time heretofore in possession of or claimed by any of the Indians of the Six Na- tions, the River Indians, or by any other Indians be- longing or depending On Our said Province. And we do hereby likewise Ordain and Direct, that the North Bounds of our County of Ulster shall be- gin at the Mouth of the said Sawyer's Creek or Brook, and extend from thence West to the utmost extent ol Our said Province. And We do hereby further Ordain and Direct, That the County of Dutchess do and shall contain All the Lands between Hudson's River and the Colony of Connecticut, from the North Bounds of the County of Westchester to the South Bounds of the County of Al- bany. And Our Royal Will and Pleasure is, and We do hereby Direct and Require, That Our Surveyor Gen- eral of Our said Province of New York, shall, with all convenient speed, Run, and Survey the Partition Line between the Counties of Westchester <& Dutchess, the Partition Line between the Counties of Dutchess and Albany, and the Partition Line between the Counties of Albany and Ulster. In Testimony Whereof, We Have caused these Our Letters to be Made Potent, and the Seal of Our Province of New York to be hereunto affixed. Witness our Trusty and Well-beloved William Cosby, £stj., Captain Gen- eral and Governour-in Chief of Our said Province of New York and the Territories depending/ thereon in America, Vice-Adniiral of the same, and Colonel in his Majesty's Army, &c. in and by and with the Consent and Advice of Our Council of Our said Province, at Fort George in Our City of New York, the Twenty nineth Day of August, in the Seventh Year of Our Reign Annoq; Dom. 1733." This Ordinance really established the boundaries, not only of Westchester County but of the whole Province outside of Long Island, Staten Island, Man- hattan Island and the County of Orange at its date. Its description of the County of Albany is believed to be the largest and fullest of that County extant, prac- tically including in itthe whole Indian territory of the Six Nations westward, wherever they ruled in 1733. By it the southern portion of the "Oblong" was formally annexed to, and made apart of the County of Westchester as it has ever since remained. It did not however extend the lines of the Manors and Patents granted before its date, and bounded by the original Colony line to the new one. The manor of Cort- landt was not thereby extended to the new Colony line established in 1731. Mr. Robert Livingston a few years after the date of this ordinance, undertook to claim that his Manor of Livingston was by implied intendment extended to the new Colony line, and instituted an ejectment suit against tlie then owners of the part of the Oblong adjoining his manor, but he did not succeed. Some of the papers in this matter which the writer has examined show, however, that the "Oblong" owners were exceedingly alarmed at this claim. This Ordinance is also of interest as being a good admirable example of an instrument of royal rule confined to the British Crown Colonies in America. For the next thirty-five years the Bounds of the County remained unchanged, no other Ordinance or Act relating to the limits of Westchester was made or enacted. The division line in the Hudson River and in the Sound, however, became questioned in criminal Proceedings. To settle all questions on ihis subject of every kind, whatsoever, on the 30th of December, 17(58, the very last day of that year, an Act was passed, "To ascertain Part of the Southern and West- ern Boundaries " of the County of Westchester, the Eastern Boundaries of Orange County, and Part of the Northern Bounds of Queens County." ' It settled the jurisdiction over, and also the title to, all the islands and inlets in the Sound, many of tbem mere masses of naked rock, rising from its waters. It is in these words ; " Whereas there are many Islands lying and being in the Sound, to the Eastward of Frog's Neck, and Northward of the main channel, opposite to the County of Westchester, several of which are not in- cluded in any county in this Province. And Whereas, also that ])art of Hudson's River, which lies opposite to the said County of Westchester, is not included in any County of this Province ; in order to remedy which, and to render the Administra- tion of Justice more effectual ; I. Be it Enacted by his Krcellency the Governor, the Council, and the General Assembly, and it is hereby En- acted by the Authority of the same,' That by all the Islands lying and being in the Sound to the Eastward of Frog's Neck, and to the Northward of the Main Channel, and as far Eastward as Captain's Island, in- cluding the same, together with all that part of the Sound, included within these Boundaries shall be and remain in the County of Westchester ; and all the Southernmost part of the Sound from the bounds aforesaid sis far as Queens County extends Eastward, shall be, and is hereby, annexed to Queens County ; and all that part Hud sons River, which adjoins the County of Westchester, and is to the Southward of the County of Orange;'' or so much thereof as is included within this Province, and the Easternmost half Part of said River, from the Southermost Bounds of the County of Orange, to the Northermost Bounds of the County of Westchester, shall also be and remain in the said County of Westchester. 1 J I. Van Scliaack's Laws cli. 1376, p. 'HI. - This was Uie I'onu of enacting clause used in tlie Colouial T.egislature of New York. ^ Orange then inchuleJ wliol is now Rockland County. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 115 II. The second cliiuse enacts that " The Middle of the said (Hudson) River shall be, and is hereby dc- i-hired to bo, the Boundary Line between the said (bounties of (>ranc/r and Westchester," and tliat the western half "is declared to be included in, and an- nexed to the said County of Oranf^c, together with all , the Islands included within the said Rounds." III. And be it further Enacted by the Authority afore- miid. That from and after the I'ublication of this Act, all the Islands and I'reniises hereby included in, and aiuiexcd to the said County of Wesfehexter, shall be taxed and subject to all such Laws, Rules, and Regu- lations, with those Manors, Towns, or Districts, to which they are nearest in Situation." The effect of this law was to remove all doubt that might arise in relation to the subject of the act. It all'ected the coast-line of every Manor in the County. From the ninth day of July, 177(), when the Provin- cial Congress sitting then at White Plains, accepted, while " lamenting the necessity which rendered that measure unavoidable," ' the Declaration of Indepen- dence, until 1781), when the Government of the United States, framed by the convention of 1787, went into operation. New York was an independent Sovereign State, mistress of herself, and as such was one of the thirteen independent Sovereignties so acknowledged by the British Treaty of Peace in 1783. While in this condition her Legislature divided her territory into counties and townships, and made some changes in the former from what they had been under the Province of New York. This was done by two acts pa.ssed on the 7th of March, 1788, chapters 63 and ()4 of the Laws of 1788.- Both acts, however, were only to take effect from and after the first day of Ajjril, 1789. By the former, which related to the counties, the State was divided into sixteen counties, four more than by the act of 1691, to be called by the names of New York, Albany, Suf- folk, Queen's, King's, Richmond, Westchester, Or- ange, Ulster, Dutchess, Columbia, Washington, Clin- ton, Montgonu'ry, Cumberland and (lloucester." AVestchester is thus described : " The County of Westchester to contain all that part of this State, bounded southerly by the Sound, easterly by the State of Connecticut, Tiortherly by the North Bounds of the Manor of Cortlandt, and the same line continued east to the bounds of Connecticut, and west to the middle of Hudson's River, and westerly by a line running from thence down the middle of Hudson's liiver until it comes opposite to the Bounds of the State of New Jersey, then west to the same, then southerly along the east Bounds of the State of Neu- Jer.iey to the Line of the Coiuity of New York, and then along the same easterly and southerly to the Sound, or East Rioer, including Captain's Island, and all the islands in the Sound to the east of 1 Resolntiun in I. .loiirnals Prov. Congress, 518. - II. JoUKS Si Vni ick, :il7 Hud :519. Frog's Neck and to the northward of the main chan- nel." By the latter act Westchester County was divided into the following towns named in the following order : Westchester, Morrisania, Yonkers, Greenburgli, Mount Pleasant, Eastehester, Pelham, New Rochelle, Scarsdale, Mamaroneck, White-Plains, Harrison, Rye, Northcastle, Bedford, Pound-Ridge, Salem, North Salem, Cortlandt, Yorktown, and Stephentown, twenty- one in all, — the bounds of eae,h being clearly set forth. This was the first division of the County into town- ships, an organization which has since continued without variation except divisions of a few of the towns, some alterations of the bounds of two or three others and the incor|)oration of a part of Yonkers as the City of Yonkers, the details of which need not be given here. The Bou7idaries of the County remained wholly un- changed, until the annexation of the new towns ol Morrisania and Kingsbridge, formed from the southern portions of the old towns of Westchester and Yonkers to the City of New York of which they now lorm the twenty-third and twenty-fourth Wards. The ui)per part of the old town of Yonkers has been incorpora- ted as the City of Yonkers. The County of West- chester therefore with these exceptions retains its original limits as fixed in ]()83, and confirmed by the State County act of 1788. The Township Act of 1788 is remarkable for its use of the Manors in enacting the bounds of the townships it created. No less than fourteen of those twenty-one townships are described and bounded in part by naming special lines of the old Manors, or the Manors them- selves as a whole. Eleven towns out of the twenty-one, were formed wholly out of the Manors. These were Morrisania, Yonkers, Greenburgh, Mount Pleasant, Pelham, Scarsdale, Mamaroneck, North Salem, Cortlandt, Yorktown, and Stephentown. Two, Salem (now Lewisborough) and Poundridge, were partly so formed, about half of the former and one- third of the latter, being portions of the Manor of Cortlandt. 13. The Manor of Cortlandt, Its Oriyin, First Lord and his Family. Special Franchises, Division, Local History, and Topography. The most northern part of the County of West- chester, a tract reaching from the Hudson River on the west to the first boundary line between the Prov- ince of New York and the Colony of Connecticut, on the ciust, twenty English miles in length by ten in width, in shape nearly a rectangular parallelogram, formed, " The Manor of Cortlandt." Acquired by direct purchase from the Indians, in part, by Stephan- us van Cortlandt, a native born Dutch gentleman of New York, and in part by others whose titles he sub- sequently bought, this tract, together with a small 116 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. tract on the west side of the Hudson River opposite the promontory of Anthony's Nose, which he also purchased from the Indians, was, by King William the Third through his Governor, Benjamin Fletcher, on the 17th of June 1697, erected into " the Lordship and Manor of Cortlandt." The original Manor-Grant covering two skins of vellum beautifully written, and bearing the Great Seal of the Province, its opening words highly ornamented, still exists in perfect pres- ervation. Above the writing is an elegantly en- graved border nearly two inches in width, of rich Italian arabesque design of fruits, flowers, figures and birds, in the centre of which appear the arms of England in full. The initial letter " G " of " Guliel- mus," the King's name in Latin, with which the in- strument commences, is very large, is richly orna- mented, and has within it a bust portrait of William wearing the large peruke, and full laced scarf, of that day. The great seal attached is that brought over by Governor Sloughter in 1691, made pursuant to a war- rant of William and Mary bearing date the Slst of May 1690. It has upon its obverse the Arms of Eng- land as borne by the Stuarts with the addition of a shield of pretence in the centre, charged with the lion rampant of the house of Nassau ; and, on its re- verse, full length effigies of the King and Queen, the latter holding the orb and sceptre, and kneeling at their feet an Indian man and woman, the former of- fering a roll of wampum, and the latter a skin of a beaver. The legend around the obverse is in Latin, signifying " The seal of our province of New York in America," that around the reverse, also in Latin, is, " William III. and Mary II. By the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King and Queen, Defenders of the Faith." It is attacbed to the fold of the vellum by a thick silken cord, is of wax, and lies in the covered metallic case originally made for it, and is three inches and one half in diameter. Upon the fold of vellum is the signature of Benjamin Fletcher, the Governor, and the countersignature of David Jamison, Deputy Secretary of the Province. This description of the seal of William and Mary is given because it was that used in New York throughout their joint reign, the reign of William alone, and of Anne until the Gth of September 1705, on which day the new seal of that Queen was received, and this old one was defaced, and sent back to Eng- land to be broken, in accordance with the law. It authenticated every Manor-Grant and Patent in the Province from 1691 to 1705, and was appended to every Manor-Grant in the County of Westchester, ex- cept those of Fordham and Pelham, the former of which bore the seal of James as Duke of York, and the latter that of James as King, they being the two oldest Manors in the County. From the fact that this seal was so used, after the deaths of Mary and of William, upon patents and other instruments in New York issued in the early part of the reign of Anne, attempts were once made to deny their validity in Court, but always in vain. A notable exampleof which, was that of the original charter of Trinity church in 1697. This seal was decided to be the lawful seal of the Province until superseded by the first seal of Queen Anne, as above stated in September 1705. The ancient and important instrument just described, now nearly two centuries old, at present the prop- erty of Mr. James Stevenson van Cortlandt of Croton, the only surviving son of the late Colonel Pierre van Cortlandt, is the foundation of the title to the whole Manor of Cortlandt as possessed by Stephanus van Cortlandt, and of all existing titles within its limits. It is therefore here given in full : — MANOR-GRANT OF THE MANOR OF CORTLANDT. Gulielmus Tertius, Dei Gratia, Anglia; Scotise, ffrancia', Hibernia?, Rex, fidei Defensor, &c. To all Whom these Presents Shall Come Sendeth Greeting. Whereas our Loveing Subject Coll. Stephanus Van Cortlandt One of the Members of our Couucill of our Province of New York &c.. Hath by his Pettition pre- sented unto our Trusty and well belove* Coll. Benja- min Fletcher our Capt. General and Governour in Cheifof our Said Province of New York &c. and ter- ritorys Depending thereon in America &c. prayed our Grant and Confirmation for a Certain tract and par- cell of Land Situate Lyeing and being upon the East side of hudsons River Begining on the North Line of the Mannor of Philipsburge Now in the ten- our and Occupation of Fredrick Phillipse Esq', one of the Members of our Said Councill And to the South side of a Certain Creek Called Kightawank Creek and from thence by a Due East Line Runing into the Woods Twenty Englisli Miles And from the said North Line of the Mannor of Phillipsburge upon the South Side of Said Kightawank Creek runing along the said Hudsons river Northerly as the said River runs into the north side of a high Hill in the high Lands Commonly Called and Knowen by the Name of Anthonys Nose to a Red Ceadar tree Which makes the south Bounds of the Land Now in y" Tenour And Oc- cupation of Mr. Adolph Phillipse Including in the Said Northerly Line all the Meadows Marshes Coves Bays and necks of Land and pennensulaes that are adjoining or Extending into Hudsons River within the Bounds of the Said Line and from said red ceadar tree another Due Easterly Line Runing into the Woods Twenty English Miles and from thence Along the Partition Line between our Colony of Conec- ticut and this Our province untill you Come unto the place Where the first Eastterly Line of twenty Miles Doth Come the Whole being Bounded on the East by the said partition Line between our said Collony of Conecticut and this our province & on the south side by the Northerly Line of the Mannor of Phillips- burg to the southward of Kightawank Creek aforesaid and on the west by the said Hudsons river and on the North side from the aforesaid red Ceadar tree by the THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THi: MANORS. 117 south Line of the Land of Mr. Adolph Phillips; And also of a Ceartain parcel of Meadow L3'ing and lieing Situate upon the West side of the Said Hud- sons river Within the Said High Lands over Against the aforesaid Hill Called Anthonys Nose Hegining ou the south Side of a Creek Called by tiie Indians Sinkeepogh and so Along Said Creek to the head thereof and then Northerly Along the high hills as the River lluneth to Another Creek Called Apinna- pink and from thence along Said Creek to the said Hudsons lliver Which Certain tract of Land and Meadow our Said Loving Subject is Now possessed thereof and Doth hold the same of us by Virtue of Sundry grants heretofore Made unto him by Coll. Thomas Dongan Late Govr. of our Said province and Whereon our Said Loving Suljject hath ni.ade Con- siderable Improvements liaveing been at Great Cost Charge & Expence in the Purchasing the said Tract of Land and Meadows from the Native Indians, as well As in the Setling a Considerable Numbers of Famalics thereon, and being Willing To make Some further Improvements thereon doth by his Said Peti- tion further Retpiest & Pray that we should be Gra- ciously pleased to Erect the Aforesaid tract of Land and meadows Within the Limitts and Bound Afore- said Into a Lordshii)p or Mannor of Cortlandt, Which reasonable Kcijuest for the future Incouragement of our .said Loving Subject wee being willing to Grant, Know Ve that of our Especial grace Certain Knowledg and Mere motion We have given granted ratified and Confirmed And by these presents do for Us our heirs & Succesors give grant ratifie and Con- firm unto our Said Loving Subject Stephanus van Cort- landt all the Afore recite'' Ceartain Parcell & tract of Land and Meadows Within theire Several and Re- spective Limits and bounds Aforesaid Together with all and Every of the Mesuages Tenements buildings Barnes Houses out houses Stables edifices Gardens In- closures fences pasture' fields Feeding' woods under- woods trees timbers Swamps meadows marshes pools ponds Lakes fountains waters Water Courses rivers Revuletsruus Streams Brooks Creeks Harbours Coves Inlets Outlets Islands of Land and Meadows Necks of Land and Meadows Pennensules of Land and Mead- ows ferrys fishing fowling hunting and hawking and the Fishing on Hudsons River so far as the bounds of the Said Land Extends U])on the same, Quaries, Mines, Minerals, (Silver and Gold mines only Ex- cepted) And all the Other the rights. Members, Lib- ertys, Priviledges, jurisdictions, prehemenences, Emol- uments Royaltys, Profits, Benefits, Advantages, Heri- dittements, >& apurteiiauces, whatsoever, to the afore recite' Ceartain parcells or Tracts of Land and Mead- ows Within their Severall and Respective Limits and Bounds aforesaid belonging or In any wise Apper- toaning, or Eccepted, Reputed, taken, known, or Ocu- pied, as part parcell or member thereof. To Havk And To Hold all the afore Recite'' Ceartain parcell' and tracts of Land and Meadows within their Several and Respective Limits and Bounds Aforesaid ; To- gether with all end Every of the mesuage Tennements Jiuildings barns houses out houses Stables Edefices Urechards Gardens Inclosures fences Pasture fields feedings Woods underwoods trees timber Swanij)s Meadows Marshes pooles ponds Lakes fountains Wa- ter Water Courses Rivers Revulets Rivulets Runs Streams brooks Creeks harbours Coves Inlets Outlets Islands of land and Meadows Necks of Land and Meadow Penniiisiiles of Laud and Meadow ferry" fishing fowling huntitig and hawking and the fishing on hudsons River so far as the Bounds of the Said Land Extend" upon the said River, Quaries Mines minerals (Silver and Gold Mines only E.\cp') And all other the Right" Members Libertys priveledges jur- risdictions prehemmeuences Emoluments Royaltys profits benifits Advantages heridctimeiits and Aj)|)ur- tenances Whatsoever to the afore recited Certain parcell and tract of Land and Meadow within the several and Respective Limitts and bounds aforesaid belonging or in any wise apertaining or accepted Re- puted taken Known or ocupied as part parcell or member thereof unto the Said Stephanus van Cortlandt liis heirs and assigns to the Sole and only proper use Benefit and Behofe of him the said Stephanus van Cortlandt his heirs and assigns for Ever. And Moreover Know yc tnat our further Especial Grace Certain Knowledge and mere Motion we have thought fitt according to the Request ol our tSaitl Lov- ing Subject to Erect all the before Recited Ceartain Parcell and tracts of Land and Meadow Within the Limitts and Bounds aforesaid into a Lordship or Mannor, and therefore by these presents we do for us, our heirs, and Successors, Erect make And Consti- tute, .ill the afore Recited Ceartain parcells and tracts of Land and Meadows Within the Limitts and bounds aforesaid, together with all and Every the above Granted premises With all and Every of Appurte- nances Into one Lordship and Mannour to all Intents and purposes. And it is our Royall will and pleasure that the said Lordshij) and Mannour Shall from henceforth be Called the Lordship and Mannour of Cortlandt; And further Know yee that wee Reposeing Especial trust and Confidence in the lioyalty wisdom Justice Prudence and Circumspection of our said Loving Subject do for us our heirs and Successors Give and (iraut unto our said Loving Subject Ste- phanus van Cortlandt and to the heirs and assigns of him the said Stephanus van Cortlandt full power and authority at all times for Ever Heareafter in the said Lordship and Mannour one Court Leet and one (!ourt Barron To hold and Keep at Such time and times and so Often Yearly as he or they Shall see meet, and all fines Issues and Amerciaments at tiie Said Court Leet and Court Barron To be holden within the said Lordship and Mannour to be Let for- fited and Emi)loyed or payable or hapning at any time to be payable by any (»f the Inhabitants of or Withia the said Lordship and mannour of Cortlandt or 118 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. theLimitts and bounds thereof And Alsoall And every of the Powers and Authoritys herein beforenietioned for the holdinj^ and Keeping of the said Court Leet j and Court Barron from time to time and to award Issue out the acCustomary writs to the Heirs and As- signs of the said Stephanus Van Corthindt for ever or their or any of their steward Deputed and apointed with full and ample power and Authority to Distrain for the rents Services and Other Sums of Money pay- able by Virtue of the Premises and all other Lawfull remidies and means for the having possessing Re- ceiving Levying and Enjoying the prenimises and every Part and Parcell of the same and all waifes Es- trayes Wrecks Deodands goods of felons happening and being Forfeited within the said Lordship and Mannour of Cortlandt and all and Every Sum and sums of Money to be j)aid as a Post fine upon any fine or fines to be Levied of any Ijand Tennements or Heriditements within the said lordship and mannour of Cortlandt together with the Advowson and right of patronage and all and Every the Cliurcli and Churches Erected or Established or heareafter to be had Erected or Established in the said mannour of Cortlandt. And we do by these presents Constitute and Ap- point our said Loving SubjectStephanus van Cortlandt and his heirs and Assinys to be our Sole and only Ranger of the Said Lordship and Mannour of Cort- landt and to have hold and Enjoy all the Benifits perqusites fees, rights priviledges Profits and Apurten- ances that of Right doth belong unto a Ranger Ac- cording to our Statutes and Customs of our Realm oi England in as full and Ample Manner as if the same were perticularly Expressed in these presents anything to the Contrary Hereof in any ways Notwithstanding. And wo Likewise do further give and Grant unto the said Stephanus van Cortlandt and to his heirs and As- sinys, That all and every the tennants of him the Said Stephanus van Cortlandt Within the Said Lord Ship and Mannour of Cortlandt Shall and May at all times heareafter meet Together and Chuse Assessors within the Mannour aforesaid According to such rules ways and Methods as are jirescribed for Citys towns and Countys within our said province by the Acts of Gen- erall Assembly for the Defraying the Publick Charge of Each respective City town and County aforesaid and all such sum or sums of Money So assessed and Levyed to Collect pay and Dispose of for Such Uses as the act of General Assemblyshall Establishand Apoint. And further of our Especial grace Certain Knowl- edge and Mere Motion we do by these presents for us our heirs and Successors give and Grant unto our Said Loving Subject Stephanus van Cortlandt and to his heirs and assinys forever that he the said Stephanus van Cortlandt his heirs and assinys Shall and May From time to time and after the Expiration of twenty Years Next Ensueing the Date of these presents Return and send a Discreet Inhabitant in and of the said man- nour to be a Representitive of the said Mannour in every Assembly after the Expiration of the said twen- ty Years to be summoned and holden within this our j said province which Representative so Returned and Sent Shall be Received into the house of Representa- tives of Assembly as a Member of the said house to have and Enjoy such priviledge a.s the other Repre- sentatives Returned and Sent from any other County and Mannours of this our said province have had and Enjoyed in any former Assembly holden within this our said province; To have and to hold possess and Enjoy all and Sin- gular the said Lord.ship and Mannour of Cortlandt and premisses with all their and every of their Royalty sand appurtunancys unto the said Stephanus van Cortlandt his heirs and assignes to the Sole and only projjcr use Benefitt :md Behoof of him thesaid Stephanus van Cort- landt his heirs and Assignee forever To Be holden of us our heirs and Successors in free and Common Soc- cage as of ou rMannour of East Greenwich in our County of Kent within our Realm of England, Yield- ing Rendering and paying therefore yearly and Every year for Ever unto us our heirs and Successors at our City of New York on the feast Day of Annunciation of our Blessed Virgin Mary the yearly Rent of forty Shillings Current money of our said province in Lieu and Stead of all other Rents Services Dues Dutys and Demands whatsoever for the Afore Recited Tract and Parcell of Land and Meadow Lordship and Man- nour of Cortlandt and premisses. In Testimony whereof we have Caused the Great Seal of our said province to be hereunto affixed Wit- ness our Said trusty and well beloved Coll. Benja- min Fletcher our said Cap : Generall and Governor in Chief or our Province of New York and the Terri- torys Depending thereon in America and Vice Ad- miral of the same, our Lieu' and Commander in Chief of the Militia and of all the forses by Sea and by Land within ourCollony of Connecticut and of all the Forts and places of strength within the same, in Coun- cil at our fort in New York the Seventeenth day of June in the Ninth Year of our Reign Anno Domini 1()97. Benjamin Fletcher. By his Excelys. Command, David Jamison D. Sec'y.^ The earliest movement of Stephanus van Cortlandt towards obtaining the Lands of the Manor, was to take out, pursuant to the law of the Province,'^ a Li- cense to purchase them from the Indians, in order to extinguish the Indian title. This instrument, from the original among the van Cortlandt papers, is in these words : License from Gov. Andros. "By The Governor: H Whereas application hath been made unto mee by divers persons for lands at Wyckerscreeke, or ad- > Recorded in Book of P;iteiitfi No. 7, Ijeguii in ir>95, pp. 105-170. -Explaiued above iu tbis esaay. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 119 jacent parts, on the east side of Hudson's River, the which have not yet been purchased of the Indyan Proprieto". These presents are to authorize you, Co" Stopliiiniis van Oortlandt, Mayor of this City, if fitting opportunity sliall present, to treat with, and agree for, any part of the said Land for wh*"'' there may be present occasion of settlement, or for the whole, with the Indyan Sachems or Proprieto". Tlic payment whereof to be made publicly at the Fort or City Ifall. (iiven under my hand in New York this IGth day of Novem"", 1G77. Andros." ' This license, it will be seen, was general, and jier- niitted van Corllandt to buy of the Indians whenever it n)ight conveniently be done. No time was men- tioned and it operated as an indefinite permission to extinguish the- Indian title in the region iuinu>d. Si.\ years after its date, in 1G83, he bought the penin- sula afterwards, and now known as Vcrplanck's Point, and another large tract adjoining it running to the eastward, the former called by the natives Meanagli," and the latter Appamapogh, which were conveyed to him by the annexed Deed; — SiKCllAM, and sir other Indians, to Slipluinus van ( 'ort/andt. "To all christian i)eople to whom this present writing shall come: Siecham, Pewimine, Oskewans, Tuihnm, Qucrawighint, Isighera, ami Prackises, all Indians, true and rightful owners and i)roprietors of the hinds, hereinafter mentioned, as for themselves and the rest of their relations send, greeting, know YE that for and in consideration of the sum of twelve pounds in wampum and several other merchandises, as by a schedule hereunto annexed more at large, doth and may appear, to them the same Indians in hand paid before the ensealing ami delivering thereof, the re- ceipt whereof is liereby acknowledged, and lor other divers causes and considerations, they, the said In- dians have granted, bargained and sold, aliened, enfeofted and confirmed, and by these presents do lully, clearly and absolutely grant, bargain, sell, alien, eiil'eof, and confirm unto Stephanns Van Cortlandt of the city of New York, merchant, his heirs or assignes forever, all that certain tract or ])arcel of land situate, lying or being on the east side of the Hudson River, at the entering in of the Highlands, just over against Haverstraw, lying on the south side of the creek called Tammocsis, and from thence easterly in the woods to the head of the creek called Kewightabagh, and so along said creek northerly to Hudson River, and thence westerly to the utmost point of the said 1 This pajxT is recorded in the Sec. of State's off., Albauy, Lib. 27, p. 238, uiid in West Co. Iteg. off., Lib. .\, 228. It is iilso in XIV. Col. Hist., 515. 2Thi8 wonl is so S|)e11ed in tlie orij^inul deeds and wills in wliicli it oc- curs. Tlie spelling " McHhagh " is simiily u copyist's, or printer's, cor ruption. tract of land, and from thence southerly along said Hudson River to the aforenamed creek, Tammoesis, which said tract or parcel of land known by the Indians by the name of Appamaghpogli and Meaiiagh, including all the lands, soils, meadows and woods within the circuit and bounds aforesaid, together with all, and singular the trees, timber-woods, under- woods, swamps, runs, marshes, meadows, rivulets, streams, creeks, waters, lakes, pools, ponds, fishing, hunting, fowling and whatsoever else to the said tract or parcel of laud within the bounds and limits aforesaid, is belonging or in any wise appertaining without any restriction w hatsoever, to havk and to HOI. I) the said parcel or tract of land, and all and singular other the premises and every part and ])arcel thereof unto the said iStephanus Yan Cortlandt, his heirs and assignees to the sole and only ]>roi)er use, benefit and behoof ol' him, the said Steplianus his heirs and assignees forever, and they, the said In- dians do for themselves their heirs and every of them consent, promise, and engage, that the said Stephanus Van Cortlandt his heirs and assignees shall and may from henceforth and forever lawfully peaceably and (juietly have, hold, possess and enjoy the said tract or parcel of land, and all and singular the other the |)remises with their ai)i)urtenances vvithout either let, hindrance, disturbance or interruption of or by them, the said Indian proprietors, or their heirs or any other person or persons claiming, or that shall hercalter, shall or may claim, by from under them or either of them, and that they shall and will upon the reasona- ble request and demand made by the said Stephanus Van C-A. 2 On the pcniusula. 3 West. Co. Reg. off. Lib. A, 182. < Lib. A, 121, West. Co. Reg. ofT. ^This valley beare now the odd api)ellation of " Doodletowu." THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 121 Cleerly and Absolutely Grant Bargain 8ell Alien Enfeoff and Confirm unto Steplianus Van Cortlandt of the Citty of New Yorke Merchant his lieircs and assignes for ever All that A Certaine Tract or Parcell of Land Situate Lyeing and being on the West side of Hudsons River within the High Lands over Against a greate Hill Commonly called Anthonys Nose be- ginning on the South side at a Creeke called Sinka- pogh ' and so alongst the said Creeke to the head thereof and then northerly alongst the high hills as the River runneth to Another Creeke called Assinna- pink '- and from thence along The said Creeke to Hudsons River againe togather with A Certaine Island and Parcell of Meadow Land neere or adjoyneing to the same called Wanakawaghkin and by the Christ- ians known by the name of Salsbury's Island ' In- cludeing all the Lande Soile and Meadows within the Bounds and Limitts aforesaid togather with all and singular the trees Timber Woods Underwoods Swamps Moores Marshes Meadows RivolettsStreamesCreeckes Waters Lakes Pooles Ponds ffishing hunting and fowleing and whatsoever Else to the said Tract or Parcell of Land within the Bounds and Limitts afore- said is belonging or in any wise appurteineing with- out any Reservaion whatsever To have and To hold the said Tract or parcell of Land and all and singuler other the Primisses and every Parte and Parcell thereof unto the said Stephanus Van Cortlandt his heirs and Assigns to the sole and only Proper use Benetitt and Behoofe of him Van Cortlandt his heires and Assigns for ever. And they the said In- dians Doe for themselves and their heires and every of them Covenant Promise and engage that the said Sleph : Van Cortlandt his heires and assignes Shall and may from henceforth for Ever Lawfully Peace- ably and Quiettly have hold Possesse and Enjoye the said Tract or Parcell of Land and all and singuler other the Premisses with their Appurtenences with- out any Lett Hindrance Disturbance or Interrupion whatsoever of or by them the said Indian Proprietors or their heires or of any other Person or Persons Claymeing or that hereafter shall or may clayme by from or under them or either of them. And that they shall and will upon reasonable Re- quest and demand made by the said Stephanus Van Cortlandt Give and Deliver Peaceably and Quietly Possession of the said Tract or Parcell of Land and Premisses or of some Parte thereof for and in the name of the whole unto such Person or Persons as by the said Stephanus V. Cortlandt shall be ap- pointed to Receive the same In Witnesse whereof the said Sakaghkeineik Sa- chem of Haverstraw Werekepes Saquoghharup Ka- keros and Kaghtsikroos the Indians owners and Pro- prietors aforesaid have hereunto Sett their hands and 1 Now called Snakehole Creek. 2 The Creek South of Snakehole Creek. ' Now called loiia Island. Scales in New Yorke the 13th day of July in the thirty-fifth yeare of his Ma"" Reigne Anno Domin 1683. Signed Sealed and Delivered in the Presence ol Uss the mark of By Sakaghkeineck ^ Sakaghkeineck f Sachem Werekepes & V of Haverstraw Kaghtsikroos ) The marke of Fredryck Flypssen Werekepes Gulain Verplancke The Marke of John Weis f My Marke Kaghtsikroos" t Mantion The last purchase which Stephanus Van Cortlandt is known to have made, was a tract on the east side of the Hudson, then belonging to " Hew MacGregor, Gentleman, of the City of New York," who previous- ly obtained it from the Indians. The original deed from MacGregor is among the Van Wyck papers and bears date the 13th day of July 1G95, only two years and twenty-five days before the date of the Grant of the Manor. It is a full covenant warrantee deed, signed by both Hew McGregor and Stephanus Van Cortlandt, the witnesses being Johannus Kip, Theu- nis De Key, and John Barclay. The consideration mentioned is " a certain summ of good and lawfull money." And the premises conveyed are thus de- scribed — "AH that certain tract of land situate, ly- ing, and being up Hudson's River on the East side thereof, beginning at the East side of the land late belonging to Jacob De Key and Company at a Creek called Pohotasack and so along a creek called by the Indyaus Paquingtuk and by the Christians John Peak's Creek to another creek called by the Indyans Acquasimink, including two small water ponds called Wenanninissios and Wachiehamis, Together with all and singular meadows, marshes, woods, underwoods, waters, ponds, water-courses, improvements, privi- leges, hereditaments and appurtenances whatsoever to the said Tract of land and premises belonging or appertaining." How extensive an area this description embraced cannot be stated its terms being too vague, but is was a very large tract lying east of the eighteen hundred acre tract called Sachus, or Sachoes, and known as " Rycke's Patent," which embraced the present vil- lage of Peeks Kill and its immediate neighbourhood, the fee of which was not owned by Stephanus van Cortlandt, although within the limits of the Manor, and subject to its jurisdiction, till 1770, when it was granted by special act a civil organization of itg own, as will be hereafter shown. These lands including all his purchases upon both sides of the Hudson River were granted and conr firmed, to Stephanus van Cortlandt, June 17th, 1697, by the Manor-Grant of the Manor of Cortlandt. Itg 122 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. boundaries as therein stated are thus set forth, " a certain tract and parcell of Land situate Lying and being upon the East side of Hudson's River, Begin- ning on the North Line of the Mannor of Philipse- burghe, now in the tenour' and occupation of Fred- rick Phillipse, Esqr., one of the Members of our said Council], and to the south side of a Certain Creeke called Kightawank Creek,^ and from thence by a Due East Line Runing into the woods Twenty Eng- lish miles, and from the said north line of the Man- nor of Philipseburghe upon the south side of said Kightawank Creek running along the said Hudson River Northerly, as the said River runs, unto the North side of a High Hill in the highlands commonly called and Known by the Name of Anthony's Nose, to a Red Ceader tree, Which Makes the South Bounds of the Land now in y' tenour and occupation of Mr. Adolph Phillipse' Including in the said North- erly Line all the Meadows, Marches, Coves, Bays, and Necks of Land and pennensulaes that are ad- joining or Extending into Hudson's River within the Bounds of the said Lines, and from said red ceader tree another Due Easterly Line Runing into the Woods Twenty English Miles, and from thence along the Partition Line between our Colony of Conecticut and this Our Province untill you come into the place where the first Easterly Line of twenty miles Doth Come, the Whole being Bounded on the East by the said Partition Line between our said Collony of Conecticut and this our Province, and on the south side by the Northerly Line of the Mannor of Philipse- burghe to southward of Kightawank Creeke aforesaid, and on the west by the said Hudson's River, and on the North side from the aforesaid red ceader tree by the south Line of the Land of Mr. Adolf Phillipse. And also a Ceartain parcel of Meadow Lying and being situate upon the West side of Hudson's River Within the said High Lands over against the afore- said Hill called Anthony's Nose, Beginning on the South side of a creek called by the Indians Sinkee- pogh, and so along said Creeke to the head thereof and then Northerly along the high hills as the River Runeth to another Creeke Apinnapink, and from thence along said Creeke to the said Hudson's River.'' From this description we are able to see the out- line and appreciate the extent, and area, of this mag- nificent Manor of Cortlandt, which contained on the East side of the Hudson River 86,213 acres, and on the West side at least 1,500 acres, making altogether the enormous total of Eighty-seven thousand seven hundred and thirteen acres of land. About two years after receiving the Grant of the Manor Stephanus van Cortlandt, following the usual. 1 Tenure. 2 The Croton Kiver. 3 A brother of Frederick Phillipse. The tract was called "Phillipse's Upper Patent," and included almost all of what is now riitnani County. and the wise, rule of the day in such matters, (the reason of which has been fully explained in the beginning of this essay in speaking of the Native owners of the County) * obtained from the Indian dwellers upon the lands of his grant as a whole, a special deed of confirmation. This Instrument is very important as it states specifically the lands in, and the bounds of, the region embraced in the Manor of Cortlandt. It is dated the 8th of August 1699, and is in there words ; Indian Deed of Confirmation of the Manor of Cortlandt. " We, Sachima- Wicker, Sachem of Kightawonck," (and twenty two other Indians seven of whom were squaws) " all right, just, natural owners and proprie- tors of all the land hereinafter mentioned, lying and being within the bounds and limits of the Mannor of Cortlandt, &c., have sold, for a certain sum of money, all that tract and parcel of land, situate, lying, and being in the Mannor of Cortlandt, in West Chester County, beginning on the South side Kightawonck Creek, and so along the said Creek to a place called Kewighecock '% and from thence Northerly along a Creek called Peppeneghek ^ to the head thereof, and then due east to the limits of Connecticut, being the easternmost bounds of said Mannor, and from thence Northerly along the limits of Connecticut aforesaid to the river Mutighticus' ten miles, and from thence due west to Hudson's river, together with all the lands soils &c &o.* The witnesses were John Naufau (the Lieut. Governor) Abraham De Peyster, James Graham, and A. Livingston. Thus Stephanus van Cortlandt became the undis- puted and acknowledged Lord of "The Lordship and Manor of Cortlandt." There were two small parcels of land within the above general limits of the Manor, the soil of which was not owned by either Stephanus van Cortlandt or his heirs, one of eighteen hundred acres and one of three hundred, the latter fronting on the north side of Peekskill bay, the former on the Hudson River be- tween Verplank's Point and Peekskill creek. The former was the tract known as "'Ryke's Patent." Its Indian name was "Sachus," or "Sackhoes," and it was purchased of the Indians on the 21st of April, 1685, under a license dated March 6, 1684, from Gov- ernor Dongan, by Richard Abrams, Jacob Abrams, TeunisDekey or De Kay, Seba, Jacob and John Harxse;* and on the 23rd of December, 1685, a patent was granted to these purchasers and one or two others for this tract, in which it is thus described : — "All that certain tract or parcel of land, situate, lying, and being on Hudson's River at a certain place called by 4 Ante p. 34. 5 Or Kewigbtequack, as spelled on the Map of the Manor. 8 Now Cross Kiver, an eastern branch of the Croton. 7 Now called the Titicus. 8 Book I of Indian Deeds, 88, Sec. of State's offi. Albany. ' So spelled and named in the original petition to Dongan for the Patent in vol. 2 of Land Papers of 1683, Sec. of State's Office, Albany. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OP THE MANORS. 123 the Indians Sachus, and stretching by the north side of Stephanas van Cortlandt, his hind up to the said river, to another creek, and so runs up said creek iu several courses, to a certain tree marked T. R. west of the aforesaid creek which lies by Stcphanus van Cortiandt'a land, including all the meadows both fresh and salt within said bounds, containing in all 1800 acres or thereabouts." The tenure like that of the Manor was " in free and common soccage accord- ing to the tenure of East Greenwich in the County of Kent in his Majesties Kingdom of England." The quit rent was "ten bushels of good winter merchant- able wheat yearly, on the five and twentieth day of March [New Years Day according to the then "old style"] in the city of New York.* From Richard Abrahamsen one of the six patentees this tract derives its name of Ryke's Patent, "Ryke" being a Dutch abbreviation of Richard, he having subsequently acquired the shares of several of the original owners.'^ From him and his brother Jacob Abrahamsen of " Upper Yonckers," their title passed by purchase to Hercules Lent who also acquired finally the title to the whole 1800 acres. Hercules Lent devised the patent in several parcels among his children and grandchildren by will in 17G6.' The name of Lent is still very common in the neighbor- hood of Peekskill to this day, and some of the name still own portions of the original tract. The 300 acre tract, which was of little importance, fronted on the inner and upper part of Peekskill bay, and became prior to 1732 the property of John Krankhyte. Both these pieces are shown, colored in pink, on the accom- panying map of the Manor of Cortlandt. The earliest traces of the settlement of any part of the Manor was that at the trading station with the Indians, which resulted in the erection of the stone fortified building, at the north side of the mouth of the Croton, which subsequently became the present Manor House. The largest Indian village was upon the high flat at the neck of the peninsula of Senas- qua, or Tellers, or Croton Point, which unites it with the main land, and over which now runs the River Road. Hence for convenience sake the Dutch traders sought the landing place of the In- dians, in the sheltered North side of the Estuary of the Croton, then an open bay without the sedge flats which now nearly fill it. Here too was subse- quently established the ancient ferry and ferry house, as the population, and the traffic, up and down the Hudson, began to grow and increase. The next point of settlement was about the mouth of the Peekskill Creek, and in the tract called Ryke's Patent. The method ot settlement adopted by Van Cortlandt was the same as that, which was adopted by the early Dutch • Lib. A. of Patente, Sec. of State's Of!., 114. Lib. I., West. Co., Reg. Off., 14.i. STlio " Von Rycken " origin of this name, given in Bolton's History, is fnnrifiil. 3 Lib. 25, Wills, N. Y. Surr. Off., 337. colonists, and subsequently continued by the English. What it was we learn from the " Information relative to taking up Land in New Netherland in the form of Colonies, or private bonweries " written in 1650 by Secretary Tienhoven, for the information of the States- General of Holland. " Before beginning to build " he says, " 'Twill above all things be necessary to select a well located spot, either on some river'or bay, suitable for the settlement of a village or hamlet. This is pre- viously properly surveyed and divided into lots, with good streets according to the situation of the place. This hamlet can be fenced all round with high palisades, or long boards, and closed with gates." * * " Outside the village or hamlet, other land must be laid out which can in general be fenced and prepared at the most trifling expense." " In a Colonic each farmer has to be provided by his landlord with at least one yoke of oxen or with two mares in their stead, two cows, one or two sows for the purpose of increase, the use of the farm, and the support of his family." * * " And as it is found by experience in New Netherland that farmers can with difficulty obtain from the soil enough to provide themselves with necessary victuals and support, those who propose planting colonies must supply their farmers and families with necessary food for at least two or three years, if not altogether, it must be done at least in part." Then the proprietor had to furnish mechanics of all kinds, carpenters, smiths, wheel- wrights, millers, and boat builders, and if possible a doctor, and a clergyman or school master. In this document, there are descriptions of a few regions in New Netherland which he mentions as well adapted for settlement and among them, that of the eastern and northern part of West Chester county comprising the subsequent Manors of Cortlandt, the upper part of Philipsburgh, and lands immediately adjacent to them and the Manors of Scarsdale and Pelham. The region is thus mentioned, " The country on the East River between Greenwich and the Island Manhat- tans is for the most part covered with trees, but yet flat and suitable land, with numerous streams and vallies, right good soil for grain, together with fresh hay and meadow lands. Wiequaeskeck, on the North River, five leagues above New Amsterdam, is very good and suitable land for agriculture, very extensive maize land, on which the Indians have planted. Proceeding from the shore and inland 'tis flat and mostly level, well watered by small streams and running springs. It lies between the East and North Rivers, and is situate between a rivulet of Sintinck and Armonk." * This is the first topographical description of the up- per part of the county that exists. Written twenty -sev- en years before Stephanus von Cortlandt obtained his license of 1677, and thirty-three before he made his * I. Col. Hist. 3G5-370. These streams were the Sltig Sing creek utd the Byaom river. 124 HISTOKY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. first purchase of its northern part from the Indians, it gives us a good idea of the clear-headedness and shrewdness of the man, and the obligations he took upon himself in undertaking to settle the tract. He undoubtedly did a good deal in bringing in inhabit- ants and stock, between 1683, the date of his first purchase, and 1G97, the date of his Manor-grant. Here it was that he erected the mills, mentioned (in the plural) in his will, dated three years later in 1700, the year of his death, which by both Dutch and Eng- lish law the Patroons and the Lords of Manors were bound to provide for the benefit of their tenants. Had Stephanus von Cortlandt lived to be seventy-five or eighty years old, like so very many of his descendan ts in every generation, instead of dying at fifty-seven, leav- ing a large family, mostly minors, it is probable that he would have left his manor as flourishing and as populous in proportion as that of Rensselaerswyck at the same date. The general franchises "and privileges of a Manor having already been described, those only which were peculiar to this particular Manor of Cortlandt will be mentioned here. The Rent Service on which the Manor was held, was " Forty shillings current money of our said Province " (five dollars), payable "at our city of New York on the feast day of the Annuncia- tion of our blessed Virgin Mary." The peculiar franchises of the Manor of Cortlandt were two only, the Rangership of the Manor, and the right to be represented by its own member in the General Assem- bly after the expiration of twenty years next ensuing the date of the Manor Grant, the 17th of June 1()97. In this as in all the other Manor-Grants was a clause giving to the Lord and his heirs the right for his tenants to meet and choose assessors and provide for public charges in accordance with the general laws of the Province. Like all the other Manor-Grants silver and gold mines were excepted from the grant and reserved to the Crown. This reservation was actually acted upon by the Crown in the case of this Manor. And the last century a Crown-grant was made of a silver mine which was discovered just by Sing Sing village. But space will not permit more than this mention of the fact. "Rangers" were sworn ofiicers of the Crown, to whom were granted by the Sovereign the " Royal rights or franchises, of waifs, estrays, hunting, royal fish, treasure trove, mines, deodands, forfeitures, and the like. They were appointed, either, by a special royal grant, over a special district, which was the more usual, or else, as in this instance, the franchise was named among others in the grant of a Manor. The appointment by Governor Hunter on September 4th, 1710, of Major Thomas Jones, of Fort Neck, Queens County, the grandfather of Judge Thomas Jones the author of the " History of New York dur- ing the Revolutionary War " as 'Ranger-General of Long Island ' is an instance of the former. That of Stephanus van Cortlandt in his Manor-Grant of Cortlandt one of the latter. Its value to the Lord of Cortlandt was, that it gave him the regulation and absolute control of the methods of Hunting and Fishing, throughout the Manor, the forests and waters of which were remarkable for their more than great numbers of deer, beaver, wild turkies, wild geese swans, ducks, and other feathered game, and the great- plenty of salmon, shad, herrings, and striped bass, which filled the Hudson, to say nothing of the trout, black bass, and pickerel of its beautiful fresh water lakes and streams, which gemmed in clear brilliance the vales and glades of the Manor amid its bold lofty hills, and dark, magnificent forests. The other special franchise was that of sending a Representative to the General Assembly. This was a franchise of so high a character that it was granted to but two more out the many New York Manors, those of Rensselaerswyck in 1705 and Livingston in 1715, the former eight years, the latter eighteen years, after the grant to Cortlandt. The franchise in this case was not to be enjoyed till after the lapse of twen- ty years from the date of the Manor-Grant, June 17th 1697, that is until after June 17th, 1717. The reason of this was to allow a sufficient time to elapse for the coming in of a population numerous enough to re- quire a representative. In 1697 when the Manor was erected, except a few white people near the mouth of the Croton, and near Verplanck's Point, the whole Manor was occupied by the Indians. True, their title to the lands had been duly purchased, but, as in almost all Indian purchas- es a right to hunt and fish and plant corn, was prac- tically reserved by the Indians. And this the whites always acknowledged. In consequence the entry of the whites was extremely gradual. Therefore, until people enough to require a representative had settled upon the Manor there was no need of one. It was not until 1734, however, that the heirs of Stephanus van Cortlandt, who had died in 1700, chose to avail themselves of this privilege of representa- tion. In that year at their instance Mr. Philip Ver- planck ' was chosen to represent the Manor in the General Assembly. The admission of its Members to the Assembly is interesting and curious. On the 10th of June 1734, says the Journal of the House, " Philip Verplanck, Esq., attending without, was called in, and produced to the House, an indenture that he was duly elected a Representative for the Manor of Cortlandt, in this present Assembly, as likewise the Letters Patent of the said Manor dated in the year 1697, whereby a Power and Privilege [was]granted to choose said Repre- sentative living within the same, to commence twen- ty years after its date — Ordered, that the same be taken into consideration to-morrow morning." The next day, the eleventh, the House resolved that Mr. 1 The husband of Gertrude, only child of Johannes (John) van Cort- landt, the eldest son of Stephanus, which Johannes wsi£ then dead. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 125 Verplanck "be admitted as a member of this House for the said Manor as soon as an act is passed for that purpose, and that leave be given him to bring in a bill accordingly." Four days afterwards, on the 15th of June 1734, " Mr. De Lancey " (Etienne or Stephen De Lancey, the first of that family in America, then the first named of the four members for the City of New York, a ^on-in-law and one of the heirs of Stephanus van Cortlandt) " according to leave pre- sented to this House a bill entitled, An Act for regula- ting the choice of a Representative for the Manor of Cortlandt in the County of Westchester ; which was read the first time and ordered to be read the second time. Two days later, on the 17th, in the morning session, the bill was read a second time and referred to the Committee of the Whole. In the afternoon session of the same day '' Col. Lewis Morris, Jr., ' from the Committee of the whole House reported the bill with an amendment, " which were read and agreed unto by the House," and the same ordered to be engrossed. Five days later the Governor (Cosby) gave his assent to the bill and it was, with nine others, " published at the City Hall." After which and on the same day, on motion, Mr. Verplanck was admit- ted as the Representative for the Manor of Cortlandt. He was then called into the House, and Messrs. Le Count and Van Kleck were directed to go with Mr. Verplanck before the Governor, and see him take the oaths and subscribe the Declaration according to Law. This was done, and on their return Mr. Le Count reported that the duty had been performed, whereupon it was, Ordered, that the said Mr. Philip Verplanck take his place as a Member of this House accordingly." ^ It is easy to see from these proceed- ings that the Assembly was very jealous of its own privileges, and careful to see that the admission was strictly according to law. The Act itself consists of a long preamble and four sections, the last of which was the "amendment'' added in Committee of the Whole. It is recited in the preamble that Mr. Verplanck had been elected " pursue ant to a Writ lately issued to the Freeholders of and in- the said Manor," and it then gives the reason for enact- ing the law in these words; — "But inasmuch as the Heirs of the said Stephanus van Cortlandt, by Reason of the said Manor's remaining undivided among them, and otherwise, had not, untill very lately, as- serted and claimed their said Privilege; and there not being sufficient Provision made iu the said Grant for the regulating and orderly chusing such Repre- sentative, some Debates and Controversies did arise in the House of Representatives,' upon the Return made to them of the choice of the said Philip Ver- I Son of the Chief jostice of the same name. ' See journals of the .'Assembly vol. I. pages 666 to 069 for these pro- ceedini^s. 'This term " House of Representatives " so familiar to all Americans now, wiis the term always uml in New York iu colony times, to distin- guish the .\se«inbly ofhcially. planck as aforesaid ; and thereupon for the regular admission of the said Philip, it was ordered that he should have leave to bring in a bill for that purpose; Wherefore and to the end such Representative may be more orderly and duly elected for the future." It was enacted ; — first, that Verplanck's election should be confirmed ; second, that the Freeholders of the Manor should elect " a fit and discreet Inhabitant and Freeholder" of the Manor to represent it in the Assembly ; third that the Returning officer of the Manor should hold the elections precisely as the High Sheriff held the elections in the County, and be em- powered to administer the same oaths ; * and fourth and last, the amendment reported by Col. Lewis Morris, Jr., which as it is both curious and interesting, is here given in full ; IV. Provided and Be it enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That the Freeholders and In- habitants of the said Manor of Cortlandt, shall at all times pay the Wages of their own Representative; and that nothing herein contained shall exempt them from paying their due and equal proportion of the Wages of the Deputies or Representatives for the County of Westchester, and of all other the annual publick, and necessary charges of the same County."* It is certainly very evident that the Assembly of 1734 did not believe in Representation without double taxation. There was probably some jealousy, or political feeling at the bottom of the insertion of this provision, for three years later, in 1737 it was uncon- ditionally repealed by an Act passed on the 16th of December in that year,* except as to the general County charges. This act also fixed the " Wages " of the Representative of the Manor at "Six shillings for every day he attends the Service of the said As- sembly," and expressly provided that the Inhabitants of the Manor should " only pay the charges and Wages of their own Representative." It also provided for the annual election in the Manor of " one Supervisor, one Treasurer, two As- sessors, and one Collector " with all the powers and duties of those oflBcers in the Counties of the Pro- vince, pursuant to "The Act" of William and Mary of 1691, " for defraying the public charges of the Province, maintaining the poor, and preventing vag- abonds." This was the first time these officers be- came necessary in the Manor. Elected and admitted to his seat under this fran- chise in 1734, Philip Verplanck was constantly re- elected to subsequent Assemblies and sat for the Manor of Cortlandt continuously up to the year 1768, the long period of thirty-four years. A continuous period of service without a parallel in Province of New York, and which has never occurred under the State of New York. The nearest approach to it un- der the State Government, singularly enough, being il)lc, ohtaiiicil from one of llic elilcst bi-anrli, the Engliiili one, by tljc late (Jen. Pierre van C. of Croton in l»2li anil 130 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. This large family, of which four sons and seven daughters lived to maturity, the latter of whom mar- ried into the first families of the Province, and three of the sons, (one having died a young bachelor) mar- rying into the same or allied families, formed a fami- ly connexion, of great extent and influence. It wield- ed a power, social and political, during the Colonial era which largely controlled tlie society and the poli- tics of the Province, and in social matters its influ- ence has continued to be felt to this day. All the marrietl daughters, except Mrs. Bcekman who had no issue, had large families, and those of the sons were also numerous. And when to these were added the children of Stephanus's younger brother Jacobus van Cortlandt of Yonkers, and their wives and hus- bands, it will be seen what an enormous family circle it was, and will explain why at this day all these families now so widely extended, are by the mar- riages and inter-marriages, among their descendants, so connected together as to form an almost inexplica- ble genealogical puzzle. In no other American colo- ny did there exist any such great kinship. It also explains why nobody can write correctly the history of New York under the English, witliout first mak- ing himself, or herself, the master, or the mistress, of at least the leading facts of this kinship of the differ- ent governing families of that Province. The political Influence of these New York families is best shown by the following extract from William Smith's History of New York, a most ])artizan and prejudiced work, but which in this instance can. be relied on, as the language is that of a political enemy, and was written to explain the worstingof his own side in the party contestof the day to whicii it refers. Speak- ing of the New York Assembly of 17r)2, and the influ- ence of Chief Justice James de Laiiccy, Smith says, " It may gratify the curiosity of the reader to know, that of the Members of this Assembly Mr. Chief Justice De Lancey was nephew to Col. Beekinan, brother to Peter De Lancey, brotlier-in-law of John Watts, cousin to Philij) Verplanck and John Ba])tist Van Rensselaer; that Mr. Jones the Speaker, .Mr. Richard, Mr. Wal- ton, Mr. Cruger, JMr. Philipse, Mr. Winne, and Mr. Le Count, were of his most intimate acquaintances ; and that these twelve, of the twenty-seven, which composed the whole house, held his character in the highest esteem. Of the remaining fifteen he only wanted One to gain a majority under his influence, than which nothing was more certain; for except Mr. Livingston wlio represented his own Manor, there was not among the rest a man of education or abilities (jualified for the station they were in." ' "The Seven Miss van Cortlandts," as they were long collectively spoken of, were noted for their char- aent to the writers Grandfather John Peter de Lancey of Mamaroneck (the two gentlemen being second cousins) and now in the writers pos- session. It was printed by the writer in the Apl. Xo. , 1H74, of the N. Y. Gen. & Biog Record. 1 II. Smith's Hist. N. Y., 142, ed. of 1829. acteristic decision of character, good sense, personal beauty, and warm affection for each other. When their mother died in 1723, the list of her descendants and family relatives i)resent, which is still preserved, is most sur[)rising for its numbers, length and promi- nent names. The funeral took place in New York and was one of the largest ever seen in that city up to that day. Space will not permit any mention of its details here, interesting as they are. Of these children of Stephanus van Cortlandt, the eleven who survived their Father, are thus named in his will in the order of their births, Johannes, Marga- ret, Ann, Oliver, Mary, Philip, Stephanus, Gertrude, Elizabeth, Katharine, and Cornelia. With the ex- ception of the devise of Verplanck's Point to Jo- hannes as being the eldest son, the whole real estate after the decease of his wife, he divided among his children equally. It was very large, for besides the Manor of Cortlandt, it included, lots and houses in New York, his share of the great Patent above the Highlands, a tract in Pennsylvania, and other lands owned in connexion with Gulian Verplanck, in Dutchess county, and some small pieces in other counties. It is only the Manor of Cortlandt that can here be treated of. His wife Gertrude was made " sole Executrix," and with her as guardian of the minor children, of whom there were several, as well as of the others, he a|)pointed "my Brother Jacobus Van Cortlandt, my Brother [in law] Brant Schuyler, and my cousin William XicoUs,-' to be Guardians, Tutors, and Overseers over my said children." Tlie personal and mixed estate including " plate and jewels " was bequeathed "to my well beloved wife Gertrude," whom he charged with the payment of all debts and funeral charges. And to her were also given " the full and whole rents, issues, and profits of all and every part of my said houses, lands, mills, and other such Estate whatsoever, without giving or rendering any inventory or account thereof to any person whatsoever." The will was dated the 14tli of April 1700, and was proved the 7th of Jamiary 1701. There was a custom among the Dutch j»eople of New York, not to have the will of a deceased parent opened till after the expiration of a month from the day of the death, as a token of respect.' Then it was read in a family council, and immediately offered for probate. This custom was probably followed in this case. The Witnesses who proved the will were, Thomas Wenham, Rip Van Dam, John Abeel, Rich- ard Stokes, and Andrew Teller jr., names familiar in New York to-day.* The third clause, after devising all his real estate whatsoever and where.soever to his eleven children above named their heirs and assigns respectively, - Son of Matthias Nicolls the first English Secretary of the Province, who had married Mrs. Van Rensselaer, widow of tliis Patroon. ' Tlie writer has personaUy known instatiees of tiiis custom, whii li in some families has come down to these days. , „ 1233 „ 10, „ 2764 14,333 Recapitulation. Great North lots 32,887 „ South lots 28,765 Front Lots on Hudson 14,333 Total in the Divisions of 1732 and 1733 75,985 Lots South of Croton 7,128 83,113 Lands in Pound ridge 3000 Parson's Point on the Hudson 100 Total east of the Hudson... 8(!,213 „ ' Tract on West side of the Hudson 1500 Total number of acres in the whole Manor 87,713 ,, The areas and valuations of the shares of each of the heirs named above in the divisions of 1732-8 are thus stated in an " Estimate of the Value in the Manor of Cortlandt, 1733." Namee. Acres, Value in pduniis. p. Verplanck 932 215. 2995 345. 2904 413. 6831 £973. Margaret Bayard 1027 wife of Samuel Bayard 2811 8560 7398 £948.^ Stephen De Lancey 1172 234. 3273 210. 2932 555. 7377 £999. Philip Van Cortlandt 1255 300. 2225 195. 3168 480. 6648 £975. Stephen Van Cortlandt, 1474 214. 2760 883. 2660 375. 6894 £972. I This IB not in Verplanck'B survey, but is added as an estimate from the best information the writer could ol)tain. 2 From tlie MS. in tlie Van Wyck papers. 8 Tlio seiianite values of each of these three lots are oniiltiil in the original, though the total is given ; evidently an accidental error. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 135 N'imcs Acre's. Vttluu ill poui 1234 238. 2784 300. 31) IH) 450. 7714 £988. (iC'rtiii(U~ lU'okmnn ...27(54 210. 231)4 106. 8062 £912. WilliniH Skinner ...188(5 120. 3712 675. 25(55 156. 8163 £951. Aiuircw Jdlmslon ...4095 339. 1233 240. 3(595 310. £023 £889. ... 808 218. 28(50 575. 3696 225. 7364 £1018. Recapitulation. Ainoiiiils ill N. Names. Acres. Cnricncy. ...(5831 £ 973. Margaret l>ayard ...7398 ...£ 948. ...7377 £ 999. Philip Van {'orllaiult ...(;()48 £ 975. Stephen Van C'ortianilt... ..6894 £ 972. ...7714 £ 988. ...80()2 £ 912. William Skinner .. .81(53 £ 951. ...9023 £ 889. ...73(54 £1018. 75474' £9625. The above values are in New York eurreney in which the i)()und was equal to two dollars and a half 01 United States Currency. Hence the entire value in money of the 75,000 acres and upwards, in 1733, when the division among the heirs took place, was only $25.0(52, or about $2,500 per share ; and as the shares averaged 7000 acres each, it is seen at once how extremely low was the value of land j)er acre in New York and in Westchester County at that time. This valuation also is evidence of the good sense and sound judgment of Mrs. Steplianus van Cortlandt, the sole executrix of her husband's will, and of Wil- 'Tliis HuiiiiiMt is ."ill acres less tliiiii the tiiliil acreagu of the same lots |(7.i,!iH.'i ai'res) in Vi r|i|aiU'k's survey, printed above. As the MS. from which tliis last statement is taken is a roiiph one antl unsigned, it is probable that its author made this error, and that the survey is correct. liam Nicolls, Jacobus van Cortlandt, and lirandt Schuyler, his relatives and her advisers under the same, in deciding to hold, and not divide U[», the Manor, soon after Mr. van Cortlandt's death. It likewise proves conclusively the little actual value, the enormous New York Manors and Great Patents really had at the period they were erected and granted. When the. Manor was divided into townships by the Act of 1788, there were carved out of it four entire Townships, ' Cortlandt,' ' Yorktown,' ' Ste]>hen- town,' (now changed to 'Somers'), 'Salem,' and about one-third of a lil'lli, ' i'oundridge.' ' Salem was sub- setpiently in 1790 divided, into 'North Salem' and ' South Salem,' the name of the latter being changed in 1840 to Lewisborough. So that five of the old townshijis and about a third of a sixth, were Ibrmcd out of the Manor of Cortlandt. The following tab- ular statements of the valuation of the land in these live and one-third townships, in 1829 and in 1875, the* former about a century and the latter about a century and a half, after the valuation of the Manor as a whole in 1732-33 above given, show in the most striking manner the tremendous increase in value of the Manor between the time of its division among the ten heirs of Stephanus van Cortlandt and ''he present day. ' Vn/ini/lo)i (if 1829. Township of Cortbindt, 1505,801 of Yorktown, 499,404 " of Somers, 450.94.j of North Salem, 244,(5(55 of South Salem, 292,574 " of I'oundridge, \ 55,440 ■$2,048,829 , VnliKtfion of 1875. * Township of Cortlandt, $4,316,150 " Yorktown, 1,258,641 " Somers, 1,402,108 " North Salem, 1,123,500 " " Lewisborough,'' 952,435 " roundridge, i 114,202 $9,167,037 It must be borne in mind, however in comparing these tables of 1829 and 1875, that the valuation of 1732-3 embraced only the divisions of those years • It is greatly to be regretted that a paiiy s(]ual)l)le about the political patronage in the taking of it, should have prevented the taking of any State Census in 1885, so that a comparison of values up to that year could have been here given. It is, perhaps, fair to say, that, taking one • town with another, an addition often per cent, to the lignres of the census of 187,') would be about the actual value in 188."i. j Kroni the Table appencled to Wi'stchester County, in the great Atlas of the Counties of New York, compiled by the celebrated Sinieiui IJe Witt, under an Act of the Legislature, in 182'.) and published at Ithaca, N. Y., by David II. Burr. This is the most authentic Atlas of New York that exists, and is now rare. < From the State Census of 1875, Table no. fi8. 5 Formerly South Salem. HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. among the heirs, while the valuation of the Townshijis eniVjrate in addition the lands subsequently divided among the heirs in 1753, and a small portion of lands then leftundivided, as mentioned above ; and also that in North Salem and Lewisborough the " Oblong" lands are included in their respective valuations, which were never a i)art of the Manor. But allowing for these corrections, they are sufticient to show the great increase of value in a century, afid a century and a half, of the lands forming the Manor of Cort- landt. Precisely which of the great lots of the Manor, were embraced within the limits of each of the five Townships, and one-third, which were carved out of it, is a matter of interest, to the antiqunrian at least, at this day. The following statement ol' the areas of the respective townships in Great Lots and Acres, is taken from a MS. among the Van Wyck papers, un- dated, but drawn up, as ajipears by an indorsement, relative to the calculation the jjayment of the ^wit rents. It bears no signature, and was probably made up as a basis for their commutation, sometime, within the first twenty-five years of this century. As will be seen by the footing at the end, the gross number of acres somewhat exceeds the figures of the gross number by Verplaiick's survey as stated above. AVithout attem])tiiig to explain this discrepancy the statement is given as in the original, because it shows clearly which great lots of the old Manor were em- braced in each Township, carved out of it, and the amount of the quit rent due for each Townshij) at the time the statement was prepared, wjienever that was. Tmni of (hrffaiidf. Acres. All the Front Lots 14,833 South Lot No. ] 2,±1?> North Lot No. 1 4,0i)r) No. 1, South of Croton 56^ No. 2, South of Croton 58(3 h of No. 3 300 Tellers Point 300 Parsonage Point 100 Ph. V. Planck (Verplaucks Point) !)15 23,410 Vor/:fiiir)i. N. Lot No. 2 2,784 N. Lot No. 3 2,908 N. Lot No. 4 2,8r)4 S. Lot No. 2 2,995 S. Lot No. 3 2.904 S. Lot No. 4 3,712 All the Lots South of Croton River 7,128 2^ Lots taken oH' for Cortlandt Town 1,484 5,(i44 iSomers Town. Acres. N. Lot No. 5 2,811 N. Lot No. 6 3,168 N. Lot No. 7 3,096 About a third of N. Lot No. 8 1,232 S. Lot No. 5 2,982 S. Lot No. 6 2,760 Half of S. Lot No. 7 1,330 17,979 North Salem. I of N. Lot No. 8 2,464 N. Lot No. 9 3,696 N. Lot No. 10 3,273 9.433 iSontli Salon. i of S. Lot No. 7 .1,330 S. Lot No. 9 3,696 S. Lot No. 10 3,273 9,433 f'oiiiif/riili/e, Stone Hills. ' About 3,000 Town of Cortlandt 23,416 Yorktown 23,811 Somcrsto w n 17,979 North Salem 9,433 South Salem 9,857 Poundridge, Stone Hills 3,000 87,496 Recapiliiluliun. Share ot Acres. quit rent. Town of Cortlandt -23,416 $137.00 Yorktown 23,811 138.00 Somers Town 17,!t79 103.00 North Salem 9,433 54.00 South Salem 9,857 57.00 Poundridge,Stono Hills.. 3,000 17.00 $506.00 Pliilil) von Cortlandt the third son of Stephanus, born the 9th of August 1683, was a man of clear head, of good abilities, and possessed of great decision of character. He was a merchant in New Amsterdam, and like his father took an active i)art in public affairs. In June 1729 he was recommended to the King for appointment as a Councillor of the Province by Governor Montgonierie in place of Lewis Morris jr. The appointment was made the 3d of February 1730, he took his seat in April of the same year, and continued in the Council until his death on the 21st of August 1746, when he was succeeded by Edward 23,811 I Tliis is the common name of the uorthern part of this Town. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 137 Holland through the recommendation of Governor Clinton. lie was a prominent member of the Com- mission on the part of New York, in the case of tlic Colony of Connecticut and the Mohegau Indians. His wife was Catharine daughter of Abraham do Peyster to whom he was married in 1710. ' He left him sur- viving, six children, five sons and one daughter, Catharine, who was killed by the bursting of a can- non on the Battery while watching the firing of a salute in honor of the King's birth day June 4th 1738, in her 13th year. By the death of his elder brothers, Johannes who left only a daughter, Ger- trude, the wife of Philip Verplanck, and Oloff, or Oliver, who died a bachelor, Philip became the head of the Van Cortlandt fannly. His five sons were Stephen, Abraham, Philip, John, and Pierre. Of the five, Abraham, Philip, and John, all died unmarried. ephen the eldest who succeeded his father as the . ad of the family, was born the 2Gth of October 1710, married, in 1738, Mary Walton Ricketts, and died the 17th of October 1756, leaving two sons Philip and William Ricketts, Van Cortlandt. Philip the elder, the fourth head of the family born 10th November 1739, preferring a military life, entered the British Army, in which he served many years, dying on the 1st of May, 1814, in his 75th year. He is buried in Hailsham Church where a mural monument is erected to his memory. He maiTied on Aug 2d, 17G2, Catharine, daughter of Jacob Ogden of New Jersey. They had the large number of 23 ciiildren (several being twins) of whom twelve lived to grow up, five being sons and seven daughters. The former all became oflicers in the British Regular Army. They were 1. I'liilip I 2. and Stei)hen J twins, b. 30 July 17()(), the latter died young, the former married Mary Addison and died, having had one son, George W., who died young. '■>. Jacob Ogden von Cortlandt, Captain 23d Fusiliers, killed in Spain in 1811, leaving issue. 4. Henry Clinton van Cortlandt, Lt. Col. 31st Foot, died a bachelor. •"). Arthur Auchmuty van Cortland, Caj)!. 4oth Foot died a bachelor in India. The daughters were, 1. Mary Ricketts, married John M. Anderson ; 2. Elizabeth, married William Taylor, Lord Chief Justice of Jamaica, and left oue sou, Col- onel Pringle Taylor of Pennington ; 3. Catharine, twin with Mrs. Taylor, married Dr. William Gourlay of Kincraig Scotland ; 4. Margaret Hughes, married 0. Elliott-Elliott of Berkshire and died without issue ; 5. Gertrude married, Admiral Sir Edward Buller and lelt issue ; - 0. Sarah Ogden van Cortlandt, died > C«l. IlUt. N. Y. V, and VI. ' Lady ISuUer's only surviviDg daughter, Auna Maria, married, 25tli of 11 single ; 7. Charlotte, married Gen. Sir John Fraser ; 8. Sophia married Sir Wm. Howe Mulcaster R. N. The second son of Philip, William Ricketts van Cortlandt, born the 12th of March 1742, married l^lizabeth Kortright, and had two sons, the eldest of his own name, who married 1st Miss Stevens, and 2ndly Miss Cornell, and Philip, who married Mary Bunker, and one daughter Eliza, married to her cousin Mr. William Ricketts. Descendants of William Rick- etts van Cortlandt still own and dwell upon portions of the property that fell to his Grandfather Philip van Cortlandt at the division of the Manor in 1732-33. Pierre van Cortlandt, the youngest son of Philij) the third son of Stephanus, born the 10th of January 1721, and who died the 1st of May, 1814, in conse- quence of the deaths in early numhood of his brothers Abraham, Philip, and John, unmarried, and of the death in 1756, of his eldest brother Stephen, and the absence in the army of his nephew Philip, Stephen's eldest son, became early and closely identified with the affairs of the manor and the interests of his rela- tives therein. Marrying Joanna a daughter of Gil- bert Livingston he naturally leaned to political side of his wife's family in the party contests anterior to the opening of the American Revolution. He was the representative of the Manor in the Colony As- sembly from 1768 to 1775, and unlike his ne|ihe\v, Philip, the head of the family, he took the American side in the Revolution. He was a member of the Provincial Convention, the Council of Safety, and the Provincial Congress ; and upon the organization ot the State Government in 1777, was chosen Lieuten- ant Governor of New York, and served as such till 1795. In 1787 he was President of the Con- vention which formed the Constitution of the United States. He had four sons Philip, Gilbert, Stephen, and Pierre, and four daughters, Catharine the wife ot Theodosius P. van Wyck, Cornelia, wife of Gerard G. Beekman, Anne wife of Philip S. van Rensselaer, so long the Mayor of Albany, at which city she died in 1855 at the age of 89 years, and Gertrude who died, a child in her eleventh year in December 1766. Of the four sons, two, Gilbert, and Ste{)lien, died in early life unmarried. The eldest was the celebrated Colo- nel Philip van Cortlandt of the Revolution, who at its close was made a Brigadier General, and died a bachelor Nov. 21st 1831. To him the jjortiou of the Manor containing the Manor House descended, and there he lived all the latter part of his life. Upon his death it passed to his youngest brother Major- Gen' Pierre van Cortlandt. The latt^-r was born the 29th of August, 1762, and died in 1848. He married 1st in 1801, Catharine, a daugliter of Governor George Clinton, by whom he had no issue, and 2nd Anne Stevenson, of Albany. He wius all his life a resident Fi-liruary, 1824, Lt. Col. James Driimiiioiid KI|iliiiistoue, wlifii lie lusiiiuiiil tlir iiiinic of HuUlt before Klpliinstoiiu. Slie dieil lii Feli. l»l.'>, leiivitif; four sons aud four daujjliters, tliu oldest of wliicli sons William Iliiller Fuller KlpUiiiiitouu li. N. is the 15tli aud prescut Baron Eliiliiustoia-i 138 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of the Manor, and one of the most prominent men of Westchester, and its representative in Congress. By his second wife he had one child, a son, the late Colo- nel Pierre van Cortlandt, who died only on the eleventh of July 1884, leaving him surviving, his widow, Catherine, eldest daughter of the late eminent Theodrick Romcyn Beck, M.D., of Albany, one son, Mr. James Stevenson van Cortlandt, and two daughters, Catharine, the wife of the Rev. John Rutherfurd Mathews, and Miss Anne Stevenson van Cortlandt. The Manor House and adjoining estate is still the home of Col. Pierre van Cortlandt's widow and chil- dren, having continued in the family and name of Stephanus van Cortlandt since 1C83, a little upwards of two hundred years. The necessarily very brief sketches of the van Cortlandts in this essay are only intended as an out- line, to show the general descent of the elder branch of the van Cortlandt family, the van Cortlandts of the Manor of Cortlandt. The nature, origin, and existence of the Quitrent, payable from the Crown granted lands, to the Colon- ial, and, subsequently, to the State, Government of New York, have already been explained.' Those for which the Manor of Cortlandt, and all the prior grants within its limits were liable were paid at inter- vals, but in full, till their final extinction by commu- tation under the acts of the Legislature, and the ac- tion of the state government of New York as late as 1823. In the cijsc of the Manor of Cortlandt the first pay- ments of its (]uitrent, were receipted for by the King- Receiver-Cieneral and Collector, on the back of the Manor-Grant itself, which has been already described. This course was unusual and was owing probably to the early death of its first lord and the careful atten- tion of his widow and executrix. The receipts for sim- ilar payments being generally given on separate i)as pers. These receii)ts are four in number, and cover from 1G97, the date of the Manor Grant to 1732,— the date of the first division — thirty-five years, and are as follows : l''' Endorsement. "Received this 29th March A D 1716 of M--^ Ger- truyd van-Cortlandt the sum of Twenty-eight Pounds, Proclammation monney in full of Quit-rent for the Lands Lying in the within Pattent, untill the 25th day of this instant month of March as witness my hand T. Byerley ColF. 2°'' Endorsement, Received (In Quality as Receiver-Generall of this province) this IG August 1720 of M" Geertruydt Van Cortlandt Executrix of Stephanus Van Cortlandt de- ceased, the Sum of Eight pounds proclamation mon- ey. In full of Quitrents for all the Lands Lying within the Man nor of Cortlandt, to the 25 of March 'Pait 10, of this essay, ante pp. 95, 96. Last Pursuant to the within Pattent as wittness my hand T. Byerley GoW. 3'' Endorsement. Received of Phillip Cortland Esq' for account of M'^ Geertruydt Van Cortland two pounds proc'. mon- ey in full for one years quitt rent to the 25 of March last for the lands mentioned in the within Instru- ment. Wittness my hand this 29 day of June 1721 T. Byerley Coll'. 4"' Endorsement. Received of the heirs of Coll. Stephanus Van Cort- landt, by the hands of Samuell Bayard Esq' Thirty- two pounds proclu money which together with thirty- ( eight pounds like money Received by M' Byerley is \ in full for His Majestys quitrent from June 1697 to" j the 17 of last witness my hand Nov' 7* 1732 , Arch'' Kennedy Rec' Gen'. Thomas Byerly the Receiver General and Collector \ whose bold signature appears to these receipts, arrived i in New York on the 29th of July 1703, and was a | prominent official in New York and New Jersey, of both which Provinces he was of the Governor's Coun- j cil. He died in 1725, and was succeeded as Receiver- ' General in New York by Archibald Kennedy, who i signs the last of the above receipts, in 1726. j Subsequent to the divisions of 1732-33 among the ' heirs, the (]uit rents were paid j>roportionably by the different owners. During the Revolutionary war and after it nothing seems to have been ])aid, till the state Comptroller advertised to sell the lands to pay the 1 arrears under a State law. The following correspond- a ence with, and memoranda of, General Philip Van I Cortlaiult will show how the (luit rents were settled. m I " Mamaroneck November 7, 1815 ■ Sir 1 In a conversation I had with Judge Purdy a few days since, I understood from him that you had gone !■ to Albany to ascertain if the quit-rents now demand- M ed for the Manor of Cortlandt had not already been |l l)aid, if not on what i)art of the Manor those now de- jl manded were due, and how the different propricstors 'm are to proceed in estinuiting their respective pro])or- il tions. As lam interested in a part of the Manor, I |H will thank you for any information you cau give me ■ on this subject. I hope you will excuse the trouble I |l give you, and believe me, Sir Respectfully Yours J. P. dcLancey^ General Philip Van Cortlandt. Manor House Nov. 2!) 1S15 Dear Sir On my return from Albany I was favored with yours of the 7th, and am hapi)y to inform you that 2 IV. Col. Hist., 1066. 3 MS. Letter. Mr. Juliii Peter ilc Lancey, of Maniaroiieck, the writer of tliis letter succeeded to the unsold portion of the Manor lauds THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OP THE MANORS. 139 I have settled and paid up all the Q. Rent of the Manor of Cortlandt and also commuted for all future Q. R. in such manner as not to be obliged to call on any of the Proj)rietors. Neither will any tax be noces- aary. So that you may Henceforward rest perfectly contented. There renuiitied some undivided land which wfis sold to accomplish it. I am with great resj)ect Yours Ph. V. Cortlandt.i Mr. J. r. dcLancey Matnaroneck. The following letter and certificate written by Gen. Philip Van Cortlandt explains fully this matter of the Quit Rents. " The Comptroller is requested as soon as conven- ient to make out what amount of Quit Rent is due from the Manor of Cortlandt Pattent, which includes in its bounds, the Pattents granted to Stephen V. Cortlandt for lands on both sides of the Hudson, Dated March 16, ICSo— John Knight, dated March 24 l()8f)— and Hugh McGregory dated the 2d of April l()i)0 — wliich became the property of the said Stephen Van Cortlandt, and no Q. Rent from them is ex- pected to be paid as by the words expressed in the said Mannor Pattent, which is dated the 17th of June 1()97, will appear. " Of this a part to be sold — see below. " A patent granted to Tennis DeKey and others al- tho within the said Manor was not the property of Said Stephen Cortlandt, and is subject to Q. Rent. "This was mentioned to the Comptroller, and it was requested of him to wait a few days and the numey should be paid. This the Conii)troller must have for- got when the same was sold to Mr. Lawrence who is very willing to give up the same if agreeable to the Comptroller. "This is to be paid and commuted for. "There is another small Patent granted to Tennis Dekey, Sybout Harchie and Jacobus Harchie which is also included in the Manor and is subject to pay Q. Reut. " Of this a part to be sold. "There is about eighty acres called Parson's Point, which was left by the Proprietors of the Manor un- divided and now is in the possession of the Dutch Minister — and if sold a title can be obtained, which can not be done without. Further information will be given by the Comptroller's. Humble Serv' Ph. V. Cortlandt." " I do hereby certify that it appears from papers in my possession, that when the Manor of Cortlandt was divided in about the year 1732 — there was lefta piece of land said to contain about eighty, or a hundred of hi8 brother, Stopben do Lancey, in the town of North Siilcin. The latter dieil in 1795 without issue. ' MS. Letter. acres, which I have always understood was originally intended by the Proprietors for a Parsonage, and which was not divided anu)iig the Heirs, although they all held an undivided right therein. After the Revolutionary War I obtained jxjssession tliereof and put the Dutch lieformed Congregation in possession. As they cannot obtain a comjilete title from the Heirs, I want it sold for the benefit of the said cliurch, or as much thereof as will pay the Quit Rent now due from the said Manor of Cortlandt. Ph. V. Cortlandt.'^ Parson's Point is bounded on the West and South by Hudson's River, and on the East and North by Divided lands of said Manor of Cortlandt." At the time of the first divisions of the Manor there were settlers upon all the lots more or less. The lots were divided up into farms averaging 250 acres in some parts of the Manor and 200 acres in others. Each farm numbered, and leased as " Farm No. , in Great Lot No. ," and when described the ten- ants name was generally added, thus " and in pos- session of so and so." By 1750, the whole ]\Ianor had become populated, as ap])ears by the list of farms and tenants names in the accounts still extant rendered to many of the heirs and their representatives. A very few farms here and there had been sold in fee. About 1770, as the tenants had prospered and their families increased, they began to acipiire the " soil right " as they termed it by jjurchase from the landlords. The Revolution checked this movement entirely for the time being, nor was it till 1787 or 8 that it began again. But from that time it progressed continually, so that by 1847, there were only about 2500 or 3000 acres of leased land," exclusive of the estate belonging to Gen. Pierre Van Cortlandt, left throughout the Manor. Of this about 1200 acres divided into five farms are, at this moment, still held, in the Great Lot, No. 6, south of Croton, by descendants of the heir to whom that lot fell at the original division. In Nine cases out of ten the tenants themselves acciuired the fee of their own farms. And the result has been that in every town- ship in the Manor, very many of the descendants of the original tenants still live, as owners in fee, upon the same lands which their ancestors originally took ui)on leases, and thus have held them for four, five, and sometimes six generations. In all the townships there are a few instances where dishonest persons have by trick aud chicanery acquired farms, by a series of " squattings " and fraudulent transfers and so-called sales of leases. But as a body the old tenants dealt honestly and squarely with the owners. Some of the leases it may be said, provided for a partial payment of the rent fixed, in kind, as in wheat, in two or four fat fowls, and in so many > Original MS. 140 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " days work with carriage and horses," meaning not " a carriage " in our sense of the word to-day, but a day's work with wagon and team. Tliis latter was Often spoken and written of as a " day's riding.'' These were all originally introduced as an easy way for the tenants in those times when there was very little mon ey in the country to pay a part of the rents re- served in the leases, which as a rule ran from one or two, to ten pounds a year. New York currency. Dur- ing the latter part of the last century, especially after the Revolution, the landlords and tenants made between themselves a private commutation, in money, for these rents in kind. The Manor as far as the personal dignity of the Lord of the Manor was concerned, ended with the death of Stephanus Van Cortlandt in November) 1700. In all other respects manorial, parochial' civil, and jwlitical, it continued intact, until its final termination by being divided up into townships under the Act organizing the State into Townships in 1788. The topography of the Manor is very remarkable, and very beautiful. The valley of the Croton lies al- most whol y within its limits. The northernmost branches of that River rising in Putnam County and the easternmost, in Connecticut, each receiving in its course many small affluents, meet near its centre, and form the main stream of the Croton, which falls into the Hudson on the south side of the striking peninsu- la of Teller's, or Croton, Point. Five or six small streams, the largest of which, is " John Peaks Creek," now Peekskill (kill being the Dutch word for creek) also fall into the Hudson. These streams form deep sinuous valleys between the high, rocky hills through which they force their way to " The Great River of the Mountains. They take their rise in the range of hills dividing the valley of the Croton from that of the Hudson, which run nearly parallel to the latter at a distance to the ea.st of it about thi-ee or four miles. From the eastern slopes of these hills to the Connecticut line extends the valley of the Croton proper, broken by lesser ranges of wooded hills, and high fertile ridges, into numerous smaller valleys, through which run perpetually, clear and winding streams. Notwithstanding this fiiir region has been the abode of a numerous and thriving population for more than a century and a half, it still possesses exten- sive forests, and rocky, wooded hills, amid which glist- en, like diamonds, numbers of small transparent lakes. So many are they that only a few of the larger are to be found upon the Maps. This region so remarkably wooded and watered, formerly abounded in beaver, all kinds of deer, and the ever present foes of the lat- ter, wolves. Many are the provincial statutes offering bounties for the destruction of the latter. The beaver lived on the streams and in the forests of Core- landt till early in this century, the last having been killed near Lake Waccabuc in 1837. To this day one beautiful branch of the Croton bears the name of " The Beaver Dam," and a high wooded ridge, not far from it is still called, "The Deer's Delight." There are two points, from which the greater part of this splendid region can be looked down upon almost as a whole. The first is " Knapp's Hill," or " Louns- berry Hill," just over the Manor line in Bedford, which was used as a military station of observation during the Revolution. The second, and the finer, is Prospect Mount in the eastern part of North Salem. It is just within the " Oblong," and though a part of North Salem since 1731, was not originally within the Manor. From its summit looking west the eye ranges over the whole twenty miles in length of the Manor of Cortlandt, the view being only terminated by the Rockland Mountains across the Hudson. The depression in which the latter lies is distinctly seen. Immediately in front of the spectator spreads the rich and affluent valley of the Titicus, the "Mughti- ticoos" of the Indians, the eastern branch of the Croton, bounded on each side by high, irregular forest clad hills, the silver stream winding and gleaming through green smiling meadows till it falls into the Croton itself five miles away. Beyond it are seen the rich, rolling, fertile lands of Soniers and York- town, the foot hills of the Highlands their northern boundary. And further still the fair heights of the eastern bank of the Hudson and above them the lofty High Tor upon its western side. No more splendid scene can be looked upon in America, than to witness from this Mount the setting of the sun on a clear summer evening. The whole twenty miles of the Manor, hill, valley, river, and forest, glowing in the most brilliant radiance beneath the deep red tints of a gorgeous sky, and then as the great luminary, tinting their peaks with gold, sinks behind the blue Rockland Mountains, the whole suddenly blotted out in a deep purplish sombre gloom. Upon the lower slopes of the height stands the old home of the Keelers, now the residence of Hobart Keeler, the fourth or fifth in a direct line who for a century and a half have always dwelt there. And yet it is so high, that from his dining room windows on a clear day. High Tor and the other Rockland mountains are plainly visible. In the southeastern part of the Manor is a range of heights trending from northwest to southeast dividing the valley of the Croton from that of Long Island Sound, in which rise st reams running south- erly to the Sound the chief of which are the Myanos, now known as the Mianus, and the Armonck, or By- ram River. Thus within the Manor are three distinct water-sheds, two carrying their waters into the Hud- son, and one into the sound. The origin of the name of the river, the great natural feature of the Manor, the waters of which supply the great city of New York by means of a magnificent aqueduct without a rival in Ancient or Modern times, is not certainly known. Different theories have been and are held upon this subject. What is ^ w 3" 3 a « 2 "1 s n OS s n !^ !C o. =. 5 " ■ > ? =- 3 5 — "3 a a 2 = ~ i-^ !^ — H »5 H y 3 <= ^ S" =^ I- = "5 = c- c — = " £ — > ^ "v ^ 'fi r. "2 2. « „t i " 5 " ^ ^ ^ ^ S — t=3 O M L. i C THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 141 certain is that the Indian name of "Kichtawanic," or " Kightawong " is tliat given to the River in all the earliest Deeds and Patents. In Philii) Verplancks survey and map made in 1732 the name he gives to it is the " Kightcwank Creek or Groatun's River." ' As Mr. Vcrplanck lived many years prior to 1732 in the Manor, and knew every one interested in it, from shortly after the death of Stephanus Van Courtland to his own death a period of about seventy years, his opportunities of knowing the English name of the stream were certainly better than those of any one of whom we now have knowledge. He was also a sur- veyor, and hence obliged to be particular in giving correct names to natural features. Now he called it on his map of 1732 " Groatun's River," hence at that d.ate such was certainly its English name. Therefore the name must have originated between 1()!)7 the date of the Manor Grant in which it is described by its In- dian name and 1732, the date of the Manor Map, that is within the period of tliirty-five years. But whether " Groatun " from which the change to " Cro- ton " was very easy, was the name of an Indian or a Dutchman can never be known. The j)robability is that if there was such a man he dwelt near the mouth of the stream, and his name given to it at his dwelling-place was extended gradually throughout its entire length. But whatever the origin, " Croton " it has been for more than a century, and " Croton " it will forever remain. 14 TIte Manor of Scarsdale, Its Origin, Local History, Adjoining Patents and Manors, Its First Lord and his Faiaily, Division and Topography. Named by its Lord after that division of the beau- tiful county of Derby, nearly the geographical centre of England, in which the city of Chesterfield, crown- ing a lofty verdant height, sits like a queen upon her throne, the rivers Rother and Hii)per flowing to- gether at her feet, termed the " Hundred of Scars- dale," in which he was born. Colonel Caleb Heath- cote proved at once his own good taste and his love for the ancient home of his fathers. The name de- scribes equally well the English locality and its Amer- ican namesake. " Scarrs " was the Saxon word for rocky crags, and " dale " for valley. The western and northwestern parts of the Hundred of Scarsdale are noted for the rocky heights and deep valleys which form that striking Derbyshire scenery immor- talized in the " Peveril of the Peak " of Sir Walter Scott. The western and northwestern parts of the Manor of Scarsdale are overlooked by the hills and crags, half covered with forests, at the foot of which flows the river Bronx ; while the vales and glades of the lower heights which separate the valleys of the Bronx and the Sound, upon one of which he dwelt in his earlier life, are also immortalized in the " Si)y " of the Neutral Ground of Fenimnre (Jooper. The Manor of Scarsdale was of irregular shape ow- ing chiefly to the winding course of the Mamaroneck River, which formed a large part of its eiistern bound- ary. By its terms the Manor-Grant included a tract embracing the i)resent towns of Mamaroneck, Scars- dale, a small i)art of Harrison, with White plains, and a portion of Northcastle. But as a dispute existed with "some of y'' inhabitants of y° town of Rye " as to White plains at the time of Colonel Ileathcote's'' purchase of the tract, the Manor-tJrant expressly provided that it should give no further title to White plains to Colonel Heathcote than what he already had before it issued. Irrespective of White plains and the lands beyond, the length of the Manor was about nine miles by an average width of a little more than two miles. The following is the MANOR-(iRANT OP THE MANOR OF SCARSDALE. William the third by the Grace of God of Eng- land, Scotland, France & Ireland, King, Defender of the faith &c. To all to whom these presents shall come sendeth greeting ; Whereas our loving subject Caleb Heathcote, Esqr. hath i)etitioned the Hon.ble John Nanfan our Lt. Govern'r, & Comand' in Cheif of the Province of New Yorke in America, & our Councill of the said Province, for a confirmation of a tract of land in the County of Westchester, Begin- ning at a marked tree by Mamoronack River w'ch is the eastermost side of the Northern bounds of Mamo- ronack Township, being about two miles from the country road & to run along the sd. River to the head thereof, & thence on a north line untill eighteen miles from the said marked tree is compleated ; west- erly, beginning at the marked tree or a great rock be- ing the westermost part of the northern bounds of the aforesd. township, being about two miles from the country road, & thence to run northerly eighteen miles as the line on the eastermost side of the said land runcth, including in the sd. Mannor his eighth parte of the two miles laid out for the town of i\Iamo- ronack, with the lott he now liveth on, & the lott bought of Alice Hatfeild, w"' the lands & meadows below westerly to a path to him belonging by virtue of his deeds & conveyances, parte of w'* land within ye bounds aforesd. was purchased by Juo. Richbell from ye Native Indian Proprietoi-s w"'' sd. Jno. Rich- bell had a grant & confirmation for yc same from Coll. Fra." Lovelace, late Gov^ of ye sd. Province, & the right of ye sd. Jno. Richbell therein is legally vested in the sd. Caleb Heathcote, & other parte has been purchased by yc sd. Caleb Heathcote of ye Na- tive Indian Proprietors ; & whereas ye sd. Caleb Heathcote hath further petitioned our sd. Lt. Gov- ernor & Councill that ye sd. tract of land may be erected into a Mannour by ye name of ye Maniiour See tlie Manor map and bis "explanatioin " api>ciiilcd to it. -Tliis Dninc is projwrly pronoimccd aa if spelled "Hethcut," not " Ileethcote," as often heard. 142 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. oi Scarsdale, whereupon our sd. Lt. Govern"' by & w"" ye advice of o'"' Councill Directed a Writt to ye high Slierrife of yesd. County of Westchester to enquire to w' damage such patent would bo, w"' writt issued ac- cordingly, w"" a proviso that it should not give ye sd. Caleb Heathcote any further title then which he al- ready hath to ye lands called ye White Plains, w'^'' is in dispute between ye said Caleb Heathcote & some of the inhabitants of the town of Rye, whereupon the sd. sherrifc returned y' the Jurors found that there is no damage to the King, or his subjects, in erecting the Mannour aforesd., except yesd. white Plaines w.'^^' are in dispute & contest between ye sd. Caleb Heath- cote & the town of Rye, & excepting James Mott & the rest of ye freeholders of Mamoronack who have deed within the i)atent of Richbell ; Know yee that of our special grace, certain knowledge, & meer motion, wee have given, granted, ratified, & confirmed, & by these presents, doe for us, our heires & successors, give, grant, ratifye, & confirme, unto ye sd. Caleb Heathcote, his heires, & assigues. All & every ye aforesd. tracts & ])arcells of land and meadow w"" in ye respective limits & bounds beforementioned & ex- pressed, together w"" all & every ye messuages, ten- em'"*, buildings, harnes, houses, out-houses, fences, orchards, gardens, pastures, meadows, marshes, swamjjs, ])ools, ponds, waters, water courses, woods, underwoods, trees, timbers, quarries, runs, rivers, riv- oletts, brooks, lakes, strejimes, creeks, harbores, beaches, bayes, islands, ferries, fishing, fowling, hunt- ing, hawking, mines, mineralls, (royall mines ex- cepted) & all the rights, members, libertys, privil- ledges, jurisdiccons, royaltys, hereditam.^, profitts, benefitts, advantages, & appurtenances, w'soever, to aforesd. sevcrall & respective tracts & parcels of land and meadow belonging, or in any wise appurteining, or accepted, reputed, taken, known, or occupied, as parte parcell or member thereof, To Have and to Hold all the aforesd. severall & respective tracts, & parcells of land & meadow & premises w.^in the re- spective limitts & bounds aforesaid, w."' all & every of their appurtenances, unto him the sd. Caleb Heathcote, his heirs, & assigns, to the only pro])er use & behoof of him the sd. Caleb Heathcote, his heires & assignes forever, provided that nothing here- in conteined shall be construed, deemed, or taken, to give the sd. Caleb Heathcote any further title then what he now, by virtue of these our letters patents, lawfully hath to ye sd. white Plaines in dispute as aforesaid nor any jurisdiction w"'in the sd. White Plaines untill the same shall happen to belong to the sd. Caleb Heathcote, and moreover, Know yee that of our further speciall grace, certain knowledge, & meer motion, wee have thought fitt to erect all the aforere- cited tracts & j)arcells of land & meadow, w"'"in the limitts & bounds aforesaid, into a Lordship and Man- nour, except as before excepted, and therefore by these presents wee doe for us, our heires, & success"", erect make & constitute all the aforerecited tracts and parcells of land and meadow within the limits & bounds beforementioned (except as before excepted), together w.""" all & every the above granted premises, w."" all, and every, of their appurtenances, into one Jjordshi]) or Mannour, to all intents and purposes, & it is our royal will and pleasure, that the sd. Lord- >hip and Manuour shall from henceforth be called the Lordship and Mannour off Scarsdale ; and Know yee that wee rei)osing especiall trust & confidence in the loyallty, wisdome, justice, prudence, & circumspec- tion, of our sd. loveing subject, doe for us our heires & success." give & grant unto the sd. Caleb Heath- cote, his heires & assignes, full power & authority, at all times forever hereafter, w"'in the sd. Lordship or Mannour, one Court Leet & one Court Baron, to hold, & keep, at such time & times, h so often yearly, as he or they shall think meet, & wee doe further give & grant to ye sd. Caleb Heathcote, his heires & assignes, all fines, issues, & amerciaments, at the sd. Court Leet & Court Baron to be holden within our said lordship or manor, to be sett, forfeited, or im- posed, or payable, or happening, at any time to be l)ayable, by any of the inhabitants of, or w"'ii], the said Lordshipp or Manuour of Scarsdale or die Lim- itts & bounds thereof, & also all & every power & powers, authority & authorityes, for the holding & keeping, the sd. court leet, & court baron, from time to time, & to award & issue out, the accustomed writts to be issued & awarded out of courts leet & courts baron, as also that the sd. court leet & court baron be kept by the sd. Caleb Heathcote his heires and as- signes forever, his, or their, or any of their, stewards deputed & appointed, w"' full & ample power & au- tiiority to distrain for the rents, services, & other sumes of money, payable by virtue of ye i)remises & all other lawful reraedys & means for the havcing, possessing, levying, & enjoying the premises, & every jiartc & parcell of the same, & all waifes, estrayes, deodands, & goods of fellons, happening, or to hap- I)en, being or to be, forfeited, w."'in the sd. Lordship or Mannour of Scarsdale. And wee doe further give & grant unto the said Caleb Heathcote his heires & assignes, that all & singular ye tenants of him the sd. Caleb Heathcote, within the sd. Mannour, shall & may at all times hereafter meet together & choose assessors within the man."' aforesd. according to such rules, wayes, & methods, as are prescribed for cities towns & counties within our sd. j)rovince, by ye acts of Generall of Assembly for defraying the publick charge of each respective city, town, & county, afore- said, & all such sumes of money so assessed & levyed, to collect & dispose of, for such uses, as any act or acts of the sd. gener." assembly shall establish & ap- point, to have, hold, possess, & enjoy, all & singular the sd. Lordship or Mannour of Scarsdale & premises, with all & every of their appurtenances, unto ye sd. Caleb Heathcote, his heires & assignes, forever, and that the sd. Lordship or Man."' aforesd. shall be & forever continue free & exempt from the jurisdicson THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 143 ss.: of uiiy town, township, or Maiiour, whatsoever, to be holden of us, our heires & successors, in free & comon soccaRe according to the tenure of our Mannour of East Greenwicli in the county of Kent, w"'in our Kingdonie of Enghmd, yielding rendering and p(iiji/i(j therefore, yearly, & every year, forever, at our city of New Yorke, unto us our heires & successours, or to such officer or officers as shall from time to time be ini|)owered to receive the same, /ire jxtunds currant money of New Yorke, upon the Nativity of our Lord, in lieu & stead of all services, dues, duties, or de- mands, whatsoever. In testimony whereof wee have caused the great seale of our province of New Yorke to be hereunto affixed. Witness John Nan fan Esq."' our Lt. Governour & Comaiider in Chief of our Province of New York & territories depending thereon, in America. Given at fort William Henry in our city of New Yorke this 21st day of March in the fourteenth year of our reign Anno Domini 1701. John Nanfaii. By /lis Hon"''" comaud M. Clarkson Secry. I do hereby certify the aforegoing to be a true coi)y of the original record word & 5th line page 229 being obliterated and or interlined in its stead as in said record. Compared therewith by me. Lewis A. Scott, Secretory. State of New York, Office of the Secretary of State. I hare compared the preceding copy of Letters Pat- ent with the record thereof in this office, in Book Number Seven of Patents at [lage 19") and 1 do hereby certil'y the same to be a correct transcript therefrom and of the whole thereof. Witness my hand and the seal of office of the Secre- tary of State, at the City of Albany, the 1st day of Se/itrni fjcr, one thousand eiyht hundred and eighty four. 1^=^ Anson tJ. Wood ' I'nrB I Dq)nfy Secretary of State. John llichl)ell who is stated in this Manor-Grant, to Colonel Heathcote (which exjjressly vested Rich- bell's title in the latter), to have been the purchaser of part of the Manor-laud originally "from ye native Indian proprietors," was one of a fanuly of Ilamp- sliire-men either in, or from the neighbourhood of the city of Southampton, in that County, in Eng- land. They were also merchants in London engaged in trade with America. In the seventeenth century a large trade was carried on between England, the West Indies, and the ' Plantations on the Maine' of -Vmerica. Of this trade the central point in the West Indies was Barbadoes then, as now, a British Island. The voyages were from England to Barbadoes, thence to New York or Boston, and thence back to England. Hence the continual refeience in the accounts aiul letters of that day to the "news from home via Bar- bardoes." Precisely when John Kichbell left Eng- land is not known. He was a merchant in Charlestown, Massachusetts, according to Savage's Genealogical Dictionary in 1648. In an inventory of the estate of Robert Gibson of Boston, dated the lltb of August 1(55!), aj)pears this item, " due from Mr. John Kich- bell for wages and wine £30, 4, 0, under date of 8th August l(55t).' The next year 1657 he was apparently in the Island of Barbadoes. Prior to this latter date he was in the island of St. Christopher's, where he received from his mother-in-law JVIargery Parsons certain goods formerly delivered and {)aid unto me by Mrs. Margery Parsons upon the Island of St. Christopher's." When in Barbadoes he met with two other English- men, Thomas Modiford a resident of that island, and William Shari)e of Southampton in England. The three entered into an agreement to undertake a busi- ness which the oppressive navigation laws of England tempted, and practically compelled, many Englishmen and Colonists to go into. These laws increased in extent, and vigorously enforced by Cromwell, bore harshly upon England's "Plantations in foreign parts" at thattime just beginning to exist. Then began that illicit contraband trade in America which con- tinued and increased from that time during the whole colonial period. And which proved, in conse(iUcnce of the very stringent measures adopted by England late in the eighteenth century to sup[)rcss it, thcreljy in juring the business interests of the colonics, one of the potent, if not the 171 ost potent, of the causes which produced that great event, the American Revolution. The " Instructions" to Richbell from his partners in relation to their business still exist in the pu])lic Archives of New York. The ])arties naiued, were "Thomas Modiford of Barbadoes, William Sharpe of Southami)ton [I^ngland], and John Richbell of Charlestown, New England, Merchants." All were in Barbadoes apparently at the date of the " Instruc- tions," which, as clear and specific, as they are inter- esting and curious, are here given in full They are headed : — " Instructions delivered to Mr. John Richlntl in ordeu to the intended settlement uf a Plantation in the south-icext parts of Neic Enyland, in behalf of himself and of sub- scribers." They piously begin, and are in these words: — "God sending you to arrive safely in New England, our advice is that you informe yourself fully by sober understanding men of that parte of [the] land which lyetli betwixt Connecticott and the Dutch Colloiiy, and of the seacoast belonging to the same, and the Islands that lye betwixt Long Island and the Maine, viz.: within what government it is, and of what kindo that government is, whether very strict or remis.se, who the Chiefe !\Ligistrates are, on what termcs ye 'XI. N. v.. (ien. Uec, p. :ilT. - Kccitul ill a Jeoil to her of lUli Nov., 1008, iu the writer's posaeasiuii. 144 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Indians stand with them, and what bounds the Dutch pretend to, and being satisfyed in these particuhirs, (viz.) that you may with security settle there and without offence to any. Then our advice is that you endeavour to buy some small Plantation that is al- ready settled and hath an house, and some quantity of ground cleared and which lyeth so as you may enlarge into the woods at pleiisure in each, — be sure not to fayle of these accommodations. I. That it be near .some navigable Ry ver, or at least some safe port or harbour, and that the waye to it be neither long nor difficult. II. That it be well watered by some running streame, or at least by some fresh ponds and springs, near adjoining. III. That it be well wooded, which I tliinke you can hardly mis.se of. That it be healthy, high, ground, not boggs or fens, for the hopes of all consists in that consideration." Tiien after cautioning him to obtain a good title, and directing him how to begin and carry on the actual settling and planting of the location, the in- structions, with a sharj) eye to their main object, thus conclude; — " La,stly, we desire you to advise us, or either of us, how affairs stand with you, what your wants are, and how they may be most advantageously employed by us, for the life of our business will consist in the nimble, (piiet, and full, correspondence with us ; and although these instructions we have given you, clearly indicates [our views] yet we are not satisfied that you must needs bring in the place so numy difficultyes, and also observe so many inconveniences, which we at this distance cannot possibly imagine; and there- fore we refer all wholly to your discretion, not doubt- ing but that you will doe all things to the best advan- tage of our designe, thereby obliedgiiig your faithful friends and servants Thos. Modilord Barbadoes h^ept. 18, 1G57. Will. Sharpe.' Certainly John Richbell carried out these " instruc- tions " to the letter. No better desiTijjtion of the situation of ]\Iamaroneck and its peculiar local char- acteristics could be written than they contain. Directly on the Sound, close to Connecticut and claimed by that Colony, yet within the Dutch juris- diction, with a deeply indented harbour, and a fine ever running stream of fresh water falling over a reef directly into it, backed by high wooded hills, and skirted by the cleared planting fields of the Indians ; and within a day's sail of the" Manhadoes," Richbell could not have found on the whole coast a locality better adapted to the " nimble" business of himself and his Barbadoes friends. There was only a single point in which it failed to meet their "instructions." It was not "already settled," and had no "house" already built. The Siwawoy tribe of .Mohican Indians were its sole inhabitants when Richbell first saw I Deed book III., Sec. of State's off., 132, 120. Mamaroneck, and their Sachems were Wappaque- wam and Mahatahan,^ brothers in authority, but not in blood. How soon Richbell left Barbadoes, after the date of his instructions, or when he arrived in New Nether- land, or on Long Island, is not known. He pur- chased that beautiful peninsula, or a part of it, in Oyster Bay, afterwards, and still, known as Lloyd's Neck, on the 5th of September IGGO, which six years later he subsequently sold.^ He was a resident of Oyster Bay from IGGO to 1GG3 or 1GG4, and afterwards of Mamaroneck. A year later, in September 1G61, he made the first purchase of the Mamaroneck lands of the Indians, the deed for which is as follows : — The Indian Deed to John Richbell. Mammarauock, y* 23* Sept. 1661. Know all men by these presents ; — That I Wappaquewam Riglit owner and Proprietor of part of this Land, doe by order of my brother who is another Proprietor & by Consent of the other Indyans doe this day Sell, Lett, & make over from mee my heyres and assignes for- ever, unto John Richbell of Oyster Bay his heyres & assignes forever, three Necks of Land, the Easter- most is called IManunaranock neck, and the Wester- most is bounded with Mr. Pell's purchase : Therefore Know all men whom these presents concerne, that I Wa[)paquewam Doe this Day alienate and Estrange from mee, my heires, and assignes for ever unto John Richbell his heyres and assignes forever these three Necks of Land with all the JNIeadows Rivers and Islands thereunto belonging. Also the said Richbell or his Assignes may freely feed cattle, or cutt Tind)er Twenty miles Northward from the marked Trees of the Necks, fibr and in consideracion the said Richbell is to Give and Deliver unto the aforenamed Wajjpa- ([uewam the goods hereunder mentioned, the one hallo about a month after the date here of, and the other halfe the next Spring following, as the Inter- preters can Testifye, & for the true performance hereof I Wappaquewam doe acknowledge to have Rcseived two Shirts & Ten Shillings in Wampum the Day and Date above Written. The mark of + Wappaquewam, Twenty Two Coats, One hundred fathom of Wampum, Twelve Shirts, Ten paire of Stockings, J Twenty hands of powder, J Twelve barrs of Lead, J Two firelockes, | ffifteen Hoes, -Iiianinglc paiitT of the tinif, this uuiuc is spelli'd " Matlietusori," Init in all tlic utliurs " Maliatithau." Si'o chapter ou " Blaiiiaioiieck " fur some iletails of Hichljell auJ Ills residence in Oyster Bay. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 145 ffifteen Hatchets, Three Kettles.^ In the December following the execution and de- livery of the foregoing deed one Thomas Revell also of Oyster Bay a merchant, and rival of Richbell at- tempted to claim the same lands under a deed from an Indian, for " two Necks " dated the 27th of Octo- ber 1661. This led to an examination into the facts by the Dutch authorities when Richbell presented to them his memorial for a " grondbref," or permit to extinguish the Indian title, in December 1661. This examination shewed Revell's claim to be a fraud, and the Dutch Government accordingly issued their ground brief to Richbell, and later, their " Trans- "port," or Patent. When the change of rule came and the English were in power and the Dutch Transports, or patents, had been confirmed by English ones under the Duke of York, Richbell had recorded with his English Patent, in the Secretary's office of the Province, the numerous affidavits made in 1661 and 1662 and laid before the Dutch authorities, on which they condemned Revell's In- dian deed and claim, and decided in his own favor, together with another by an eye witness made in 1665,- and an Indian certificate of Confirmation of the foregoing Indian deed to him of September 23*, 1661.^ The latter is in these words : — Indian Certificate of Confirmation to John Richbell. " Recorded for Mr. John Richbell the 6th day of June 1666 this Indyan deed. I Wampaquewam, together with my brother Maha- tahan, being the right owners of three Necks of Land, lying and being Bounded on ye East side with Mamaranock River, and on y" West side with the Stony River which parts the said Land and Mr. Pells purchase, Now These are to certify to all and every one of whom it may concerne, That I Wampaquewam did for myselfe and in the behalfe of my aforesaid Brother Mahatahaii, firm firmly Bargain and Sell to Mr. John Richbell of Oyster Bay, to him and his Heires forever, the above mentioned three Necks of Land, together with all other Priviledges thereunto belonging, Six weeks before I sold it to Mr. Thos. Revell. And did mark out the Bounds, and give Mr. Richbell possession of the said Land, and did receive part of my pay there in hand, as Witness my hand. Witnesse The mark of Jacob Yough -f Catharine Yough.* Wampaquewam. 'Thisileedia recorded in the Secretary of State's office at Albany, Book of Entries No. 4, p. 1^5 ; and is here printed from a copy certified by W. Bobin DepJ SecJ of the Province on 12th March, 1722, in the writer's poneewion. In the Books as now numbered at Albany, it is in Liber 2 of Deeds, p. 192. The mark of Wappaiiuewam is omitteil in the record. • As explained above in this eseay. s Liber 2 of Deods, 192-199, Sec. of state's off* Albany. < Liber Two of Deeds p. 128. lla In December, 1661, John Richbell made his appli- cation to the Dutch Governor and Council for the grond-bref above alluded to. His memorial, dated the day before Christmas, 1661, is in these 'words: John Richbells Petition to the Dutch Government for a Patent. Amsterdam in New Netherland, 24 Dec, 1661. To the Most Noble, Great, and Respectful Lords, the Directors-General and Council, in New Nether- land, solicits most reverently John Richbell, that it may please your Honours to grant him letters patent for three Necks of Lands, the east Neck being named Mammoranock Neck, the western with the adjacent Land by some named Mr. Pells Land, promising that all persons who with the supplicants permission or order would settle there with him, shall be willing to solicit letters patent for such a parcel of land as they may intend to settle. In the meantime he suppli- cates that your Honours may be pleased to grant him letters patent for the whole tract, which he is willing to enforce and instruct them of your Honours Government and will, in similar manner, on terms and conditions as are allowed to other villages. Hop- ing for your assent he remains, respectfully, John Richbell.' This memorial was read and considered by director Stuyvesant and his Council on the 19th of January, 1662, and the applicant was requested to explain more fully the extent and meaning of his proposal. Richbell subsequently did so, and on the 6th of the succeeding May (1662) there was granted him the annexed "grond-bref" or ground-brief signed by Stuyvesant himself Dutch Ground-Brief for Mamaroneck. We, the Director-General and Council of State of New Netherland, doe declare by these presents, that we, upon the memorial or petition of Mr. John Risse- bel and his friends, that he be under the protection of the high and subordinate Authority of this Prov- ince, upon terms and conditions that other inhabi- tants doe enjoy, may take up and posssess a certain Neck and parcel of Land called Mammarinikes, j)ro- vided that the aforesaid Mr. John Rissebel, his asso- ciates, and every one that are now hereafter to come, in due and convenient time, shall present themselves before US' to take the oath of fidelity and obedience,® and also as other inhabitants are used, to procure a transport of what they possess. Given under our hand and seal the 6th day of May, 1662, in Fort Amsterdam in New Netherland. P. Stuyvesant.' s Deed Book iii. 37, Sec. State's Office. Sec ante pp. 54-57 for the "terms and conditions" referred to in this document. .\9 required by the charter of " Freedoms and Exemptions " mentioned above in part "4" of this chapter." ■ The original in Dutch of this paper in the writer's possessiou, was a few years ago accidentally destroyed. It is recorded in vol. xx. of the State Records at Albany, 127. 146 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. The Dutch " Transport " which was formerly in the writer's possession was unfortunately destroyed by accident at the same time with the original Ground- brief as stated above. It vested the lands in Rich- bell absolutely. The English Patent of Confirmation of the Trans- port to John Richbell was granted by Governor Fran- cis Lovelace on March 16, 1668, and is as follows : — The English Patent of Confirmation to John Richbell Francis Lovelace, Esq., Governor General, under his Royal Highness, James, Duke of York and Al- bany, &c. &c., of all his territories in America, to all to whom these presents shall come, sendeth greeting. Whereas, there is a certain parcel or tract of land within this government, upon the main, contained in three necks, of which the eastermost is bounded with a small river, called Mamaronock river, being almost the east bounds or limits of this government upon the main, and the westermost with the gravelly or stony brook or river, which makes the east limits of the land known by the name of Mr. Pell's purchase. Hav- ing to the south, the sound, and running northward from the marked trees upon the said neck, twenty miles into the woods, which said parcel or tract of land hath been lawfully purchased of the Indian I)roprietors, by John Richbell of Mamaronock, gentle- man, in whose possession now it is, and his title thereunto sufficiently proved, both at several courts of sessions, as also at the general courts of assizes, now for a confirmation unto him the said John Rich- bell, in his possession and enjoyment of the premises: Know ye, that by virtue of the commission and author- ity unto me given by his Royal Highness, I have given, ratified, and confirmed and granted, and by these presents do give and ratify, confirm and grant, unto the said John Richbell, his heirs and assigns, all the aforecited i)arcel or tract of land as aforesaid, together with all woods, beaches, marches, pastures, creeks, waters, lakes, fishing, hawking, hunting and fowling, and all other profits, immunities and emolu- ments to the said parcel or tract of land belonging, annexed, or appertaining with their and every of their appurtenances, and every part and parcel there- of, and in regard to the distance of the plantations already settled, or to be settled uj)on the said necks of land, from any town, the persons inliabiting,or that shall inhabit thereupon, shall have a petty constable chosen amongst themselves yearly, for preserving of the peace, and decision of small differences under the value of forty shillings, and they shall be excused from all common attendance at training or other ordi- nary duties at Westchester. But in matters of assess- ment and public rates, they are to be assessed by the officers of that town to wljich they do properly be- long, being the nearest unto them, to have and to hold the said parcel and tract of land in the said three necks contained, and premises with all and singular the privileges and ai)purtenances to the said John Richbell, hia heirs and assigns, to the jJroper use and behoof of the said John Richbell, his heirs and as- signees forever, as free land of inheritance, rendering and paying as a quit rent for the same yearly, and every year, the value of eight bushels of winter wheat, upon the five and twentieth day of March, if demanded, unto his Royal Highness and his heirs, or to such governor or governors as shall from time to time be appointed and set over them. Given under my hand and seal, at Fort James, in New York, on Manhattans Island, the 16th day of October, in the twentieth year of the reign of our sovereign. Lord Charles the second, by the grace of God, of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, king, defender of the faith, &c. &c.. Anno Domini, 1668. Francis Lovelace.^ The three Necks described in this patent, were called the " East " the " Middle," and the '' West" Necks. The Middle Neck was sometimes styled the " Great Neck," from its longer extent of water front, which led to the supposition that its area below West- chester Path was greater than that of the East Neck. The "East Neck" extended from Mamaroneck River to a small stream called "Pij)ins Brook" which divided it from the Great Neck and is the same which now crosses the Boston Road just east of the house of the late Mr. George Vanderburgh ; the " Middle Neck " extended from the latter stream westward to a much larger brook called " Cedar or Gravelly Brook," which is the one that bounds the land now belonging to Mr. Meyer on the west ; and the " West Neck " extended from the latter to another smaller brook still further to the westward, also termed " Stoney or Gravelly Brook," which was the East line of the Manor of Pelham. A heated controversy arose between John Richbell and John Pell, as to which of the two brooks last named was the true boundary between them, Pell claiming that it was the former and that the " West Neck " was his land. After proceedings be- fore Governor Lovelace and in the court of assizes the matter was finally settled on the 22d of January 1671 by an agreement jjractically dividing the dis- puted territory betw'een them. This was approved by Governor Andros and permission given for a sur- vey.' For some reason not now known, the survey and division was not actually effected till 1677, when it was made by Robert Ryder the Surveyor-General as follows ; — " Whereas there hath been a difference between John Richbell and Mr. John Pell which by virtue of an order from the Right Honourable Major Edmund Andros Esqr. Governor Generall of New York, I have made a division of the within mentioned Neck of Land by and with the mutual consent of both parties, 1 This jjatent is recorded in Book of Patents II. p. "5, at Albany. - A coteniporary copy of this agreement signed by I'ell, with Androe' permit annexed is in the writer's possession. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 14T which is in manner and form as is hereafter expressed viz.' That the said Richbell shall extend from Cedar Tree Brook or Gravelly Brook, .south westerly fifty degrees to a certain mark'd Tree, lying above the now comon Road thirty and four chains in length, marked on the east with R and on the west with P, thence ex- tending south sixty three degrees East by certain marked Trees ptixed' ending by a certain piece of Meadow at the Salt creek which runs up to Cedar Tree Brook or Gravelly Brook, extending from the first marked Trees Nor Nor West to Brunkes's River by certain Trees in the said Line marked upon the west with P. and upon the east with R. performed tiie twenty second day of May 1()77. p' me Robert Ryder Surv.^"' The preceeding Surveyor above mentioned is mu- tually consented unto by the above mentioned Mr. John Richbell and Mr. John Pell in presence of us. Thomas Gibbs Walter Webbs John Sharp Joseph Carpenter.- Thus was permanently settled the controversy re- garding the West Neck, a settlement which finally determined the eastern boundary of the Manor of Pelham. As neither the Middle or Great Neck, nor the West Neck, formed any part of the Manor of Scarsdale, an account of them will not be given here, but will be found in the chapter on the Town of Mamaroneck as now erected. In Richbell's Petition of the 24th of December 1631 to the Dutch Government for a ground-brief above given, he says the name of the " East Neck " is " Mamaranock Neck." A misreading by Mr. Bolton of the first of these two words in this docu- ment as recorded led to his stating in the first edition of his History of Westchester County issued in 1848, (vol. i. 282) that the "aboriginal name" of the East Neck was " Wanmainuck," and the error has con- tinued in the second edition, (vol. i. 463). This has led subsequent writers to repeat the statement. It was however purely a mistake of Mr. Bolton. The true " aboriginal name " of the East Neck was " Mamaranock," the same as the river which formed its eastern boundary. This word was spelled in very many ways, in early days, by the Dutch and English in public and private letters, documents, and instru- ments, but all aiming at giving the original Indian sound. In the early part of the eighteenth century the present spelling "Mamaroneck" obtained and has ever since been used. It is the Indian name of the River flowing into the head of the Harbour. Like most Indian names it is descriptive of a strik- ing natural object and eflect, and signifies "The Place where the Fresh water falls into the Salt." A short ' 8o In the original. From a cotemporary copy of the original iu the writer's possession. distance above the present bridge between the towns of Mamaroneck and Rye where the river bends sud- denly to the east and then takes a northerly course, a rocky reef originally crossed it nearly at right angles, causing the formation of " rapids." It was high enough to prevent the tide rising over it at high- water, so that the fresh water of the river always fell directly into the salt water of the harbour, and at low water with a strong rush and sound. It was thus a striking and unusual occurrence in nature, and is the source of the Indian name of the River itself and of the East Neck of which it was the eastern boundary. No authority has been found for another significa- tion " the place of the rolling stones " that has been ascribed to the word " Mamaroneck " by Mr. Bolton. Rolling stones are not found anywhere in the neigh- borhood, the rocks being what the geologists call in situ, and the boulders of huge size and weight. Richbell's Patent of confirmation from Governor Lovelace is dated October 16th, 1668. On the 14th of the ensuing November, twenty-eight days later, he conveyed the East Neck to Margery Parsons, his wife's mother, " for valuable consideration of certaine goods formerly delivered and paid unto me by Mrs. Margerj' Parsons upon the Island of St. Christopher's in America.^ Two days afterward, on the 16th of No- vember 1668 Margery Parsons conveyed to her daugh- ter Mrs. Richbell the East Neck " for that singular and dear affection I have and bare to my most dear daughter Mrs. Ann Richbell wife of the said Mr. John Richbell for her dutiful observance towards me." * By way of making this provision for his wife more secure, John Richbell settled the same East Neck upon her as a jointure, by a deed in trust to John Ryder dated 23d of April, 1669, " in considera- tion of a marriage long since had and solemnized between the said John Richoell and Ann his present wife," and therein describes the Neck as follows, "All that parcell or neck of Land where he now Lives called the East Neck, and to begin at the Westward part thereof at a certaine creeke lying, being, and ad- jacent by and betwixt y'' Necks of Land commonly called y" Great Neck, and the East Neck, and so to run eastward as farr as Momorononeck River, includ- ing therein betwixt the said two lines, all the land as well North into y' woods above Westchester Path twenty miles, as the lands belowe the Path southward towards the Sound."' John Richbell died the 26th day of July 1684,* leaving his widow him surviving, in whom his entire real estate vested in fee absolutely under the above deeds and jointure, except what little he and his wife had together conveyed in liis lifetime. 3 Ancient copy of the deed in writer's possession. It is also Recorded in SecJ* office and in West. Co. * .\ncient copy of this original in the writer's possession, original not recorded. ' Ancient copy in writers jiossession. .^Iso recordml in book A, 23S ic West. Co. ' West, Co. Recorils Lib. \. p 34. 148 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. On the 23d of December 1697 Mrs. Ann Riehbell conveyed the entire East Neck and all her right, title and interest therein and thereto, by a full covenant warranty deed, in consideration of £600 New York currency, to "Coll. Caleb Heathcote, Mayor of the Borough of Westchester," his heirs and assigns forever in fee simple absolute, excepting only a small tract previously deeded as a gift to James Mott and his wife in 1684, and another small piece deeded as a gift to John Emerson on the 30th of Sept 1686, which latter was subsequently conveyed by Emerson to Mott by deed dated 25th of June 1690, the wives of both being daughters of Mrs. Riehbell. The deed to Colonel Heathcote also provided that " this Deed of Sale shall not obliedge the said Ann Riehbell to make good to the said Caleb Heathcote any of the outlands within the Two Miles further than her right and title therein." With these exceptions Ann Richbell's en- tire right title and estate under the deeds and Patents of her husband John Riehbell was conveyed to, and vested absolutely in, Colonel Caleb Heathcote.' The above reservation to Mott referred to a small piece of upland at the entrance to that portion of the East Neck, subsequently, and to this day, called "De Lancey's Neck," of about thirty acres deeded by Mrs. Riehbell to Mary and James Mott on the 8 August 1684, which from Mott's heirs finally became vested in the late Giles Seaman after whose death it passed by sale to the late Isaac Hall, who sold it in his life- time to its present owner, who built upon the prem- ises the fine summer hotel now called, from his own name, the "Rushmore." The last and only other reservation in the above deed to Col. Heathcote related to some lands which Riehbell and his wife in his lifetime had sold in small parcels which he called " Alottments or House Lotts." It will be recollected that Richbell's object was to estab- lish a quiet place for trade at Mamaroneck. In his a2)plication to the Dutch Director and Council for leave to purchase the Indian title and their ground- brief, above given, authorizing him so to do, mention is made of some persons who, with his permission, would settle there with him, and for whom he made himself, and was held to be, responsible. These ap- pear to have been persons from Oyster Bay on Long Island and Manussing Island in Rye, between which places a sort of ferry communication across the Sound then existed. Nothing remains to show whether the trade of Modiford Sharpe and Riehbell was, or was not, profitable. If the latter, it could not have been 80 very long, for the English conquest of New Netherland in 1664, three years after Richbell's pur- chase of Mamaroneck, put an end to its advantages for a contraband business. After his controversy with Pell was terminated in 1671 as shown above, Rich- iThia deed waa acknowledged by Ann Riehbell March 22* 1C97 before "Joseph ThealJuetice" and was recorded in Lib. B, of West. Co. Rec- ords ; p 371 &a June lo"" 1698. bell did little or nothing practically towards settling Mamaroneck. His English Patent was issued October 16, 1668. A few months later he apparently set apart a strip adjoining the north side of the old Westches- ter path or road from the crossing of Mamaroneck river down to and along the shore of the harbour west- ward for what he termed, " Alottments or House Lotts " eight in number. The first deed from him- self and wife was, it is believed, made to one John Bassett on the 4th of March 1669, for number "four" of these "House Lotts." It was a deed of gift, the consideration being " the Good opinion and Good affection we beare to Mr. John Bassett." It was bounded east by No. three, and west " with my own house lot named No. five." It reserved a rent of "one bushel of winter wheat payable annually on the 25th of March," and " one day's work each yearly harvest;" and prohibited any sale of the land "but by and with the consent and approbation of the said John Riehbell or Ann his wife." Of the other six " House Lotts" those which were sold were conveyed in a similar manner and with similar reservations, except that the consideration was in monev. To each "House Lott" was appurtenant an undivided eighth part of a tract in the rear of the " House Lotts," which, with, and including, the latter, extended two miles " northwards into the woods." Later with the consent of his grantees he had a survey made of this tract, by Robert Ryder the Surveyor-General of the Province. The original is in the writer's possession, and is in these words : THE FIRST .SURVEY OF MAMARONECK. " These may certifie all whom it may conserne y' by a nuitual consent agreed on betweene Mr. John Riehbell & the inhabitants of Momoronacke I have runn out a certaine tract of Land w*^"" is in partner- ship betweene the said Inhabitants and the said Mr. Jo.° Riehbell, beginning at Momaronacke [River] running thence southwesterly fifty degrees along the barber ninety and two chains : to a certaine runn or Swamp called Dirty Swamp : running thence to the flails of Sheldrake River including the said ffalls within the said line : N. W. 20 degrees : forty and five chaine : running thence upon a N. W.ly [line] 45 degrees to a certaine Rocky hill being upon the Southermost pt. of the greate plaine, one hundred twenty and two chaines : running thence by pt. of the edge of the plaine & threw the woods to Momor- ronacke River one hundred twenty & seaven chaines : ffrom thence running by the side of the River to the Going over of the said River: one hundred & sixty chaines. &in testimony hereof I have hereunto sett my hand this ] 6'" fieb : 1671. Ro. Ryder Surueye'' : "' 2 These details are taken from a copy of the deed to Bassett, in th» writer's possession. It does not appear on the Westchester Records nor on those of the town, which begin only in 1697. 3 This survey was subsequently on the 11* of August, 1687, recorded in West'. Co Lib A, 149. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 149 Richbell's Patent of 1668 ran according to its terms North Northwest twenty miles into the woods, its eastern boundary being the Colony line fixed Decem- ber 1st 1064 by Governor Nichols, and Commission- ers Cartwright and Mavericke on the part of the Duke of York and Gov. Winthrop Secretary Allyn, and Messrs. Richards, and Gold, on the part of Con- necticut. That line these Commissioners thus offi- cially describe in their formal treaty between the two Colonies ; — " We order and declare thai the creeke or river called Mamoroneck which is reputed to be about thirteen miles to the east of Westchester, and a line drawn from the east point or side where the fresh water falls into the Salt at Highwater-Mark North Northwest to the line of the Massachusetts to be the western bounds of the said Colony of Connec- ticut." This line remained unchanged till 1683, nineteen years later, when the boundary was fixed at the mouth of Byram River as its starting point. Con- sequently the direction of the lines of Richbell's Patent being the same as that of the Colony line of 166-lr,they could not be legally set aside or suc- cessfully disputed in a Court of law. But certain " Ryemen " being of Connecticut origin did make a claim to Richbell's lands in the Whiteplains,as belong- ing to them by virtue of a deed from an Indian named Shapham, and several other Indians to " the Town of Rye " dated 22d Novemb. 1683 — twenty-two years after Richbell's purchase of the lands in September 161)1. But this deed was not obtained, nor the claim under it made by the "Ryemen," until Richbell was about to dispose of his lands in Whiteplains. What a perfect " Yankee trick " this claim was is shown by the fact that it describes the Whiteplains as being "within the town bounds of Rye," when six days after its date the then pending public negotiations fixed the boundary line at Byram River, and Rye ceased to be a part of Connecticut, as she claimed to be and from which she got her " town bounds." It was obtained in a hurry so as to base on it a claim for the land as a part of Connecticut. Smart as it was, it proved, in the end a complete failure. The claim of the "Rye Men " was simply a claim under the charter of Connecticut, which they insisted took in every part of Westchester County across to the Hudson River. Richbell at once brought the matter before (fovernor Dongan by the following complaint and petition for redress : richbell's petition against the claim of rye- men TO whiteplains. To the Right hono:'''"^^ Coll Tho Dongan Leiv' Govern'' and vice admirall under his Roy" high'' of N. Yorke and Dependences in America &c. And to the bono"'-" Councell. The humble Peticon of John Richbell of Momoro- neck Gentl. Humbly Sheweth That whereas your Petition"^ hath been for Severall years Possessed and Enjoyed of a Certain Tract or Parcell of Land within this Governm' upon the maine. Contained with a small River Commonly called Momoroneck River being also the East bounds or Limitts of this Governm' upon the maine, and the Westermost with the grav- elly or Stony brooke, or river which makes the East limitts of the Land knowne by the name of W" Pell's Purchase haveing to the south the sound and runing northward from the marked Trees upon the said Neck's twenty miles into the woods the which said Parcell or Tract of Land hath been heretofore Lawfully purchased of the Indian Proprietors by the said John Richbell Gentl and his Right and Title thereunto Sufficiently Proved as 'j^ his Pattent from Governour Lovelace bareing Date the 16'" of October in the 20"" yeare of his Ma^ Reigne Anno Dom 1668. Relation being thereunto had will more fully & at large appeare. Butt now soe it is may it please your hono"^ and the hono'''° Councell haveing a Desire to dispose of some Quantity of said Land which is Called the Whiteplaines and is men<^oned within said Pattent to Severall Persons whose names ^ are Sub- scribed to a writeing hereunto annexed for the better Improvem'. And manureiug the same & to Settle thereon with themselves and familyes is wholly Ob- structed and hind** by Ryemen haveing made a greate Disturbance amongst them and Pretends aright to the Same therefore Cannot dispose of any part or p'cell thereof till your bono'' will be pleased to grant an Order to Cleare the Same. Therefore humbly pray and beseech your bono"' and the bono"'" Councell that you will bee pleased to take the Premises into your serious consideration and grant an order to Cleare the same Accordingly Desire- ing only the privlidges as farr as his Pattent doth Extend. And shall pray &c John Richbell. This petition came up for hearing before the Gov- ernor on the 17'" of March 1684, and the people of Rye were summoned to show cause at the next Court of Assize why John Richbell was not the true owner of the lands in question. But before the next Court sat, Richbell passed from earth, his death occurring on the 26th day of July 1684. He left his widow Ann and three daughters, Elizabeth, second wife ot Adam Mott, of Hempstead, Mary, the wife of Capt. James Mott and Anne, the wife of John Emerson, ot Maryland, his only children him surviving. The Rye claim however did not die, but remained a source of annoyance to his widow. In 1694 the mat- ter came to a head. Mrs. Richbell served the follow- ing Protest upon the Rye people at a town meeting, and Subsequently began a suit at law to test the question. protest of MRS. RICHBELL AGAINST RYE.' " To all Xt'"" People to whome this present Protest ' These numea do not appear iipon the record at Albany. - From the original in the writer's possession. It is recordeil in Lib. A West. Co. Records, ICS. 150 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. shall Come Greeting : Know yee that whereas I Ann Richbell of Momorronock in the County of West- chest' in the province and Colony of New yorke the Widdow and Relict of Jn°. Richbell Esq^, Deceased Am Credebly Informed that Humphry Underbill and severall other persons belongeing to the Towne of Rye have made a forcable Entry : and are further proceeding in the Like Manner Upon and into Sever- all parcells and Tracts of Land within the pattent Right of me the said Anne Richbell as may and dos Appeare by the Grand Pattent Granted under the hand and Seale of Coll Frances Lovelace the thenGev- erno"' of this Province: it Contrary toy" Peace of their Maj"'* & Therefore know Yee y' I Ann Richbell of Momorronock aforesaid being the true & Absoelute Owner of the said Tracts or parcells of Land doe Protest Against & forbidd any Person whatsoever for making any forcable Entry upon the same or any part or parcell thereof and likewise do warne and desire all such persons that have already made such forceable entry thereon or upon any part or parcell of the said Pattent as aforesaid that they expell and forthwith remove therefrom, and further do protest ag* the Register of the County and doe forbid him at his perrill no' to enter any of their privite agreem."' or writing in the Records ot the County in presence of James Mott Justice of the peace and Benjamin Collier Esq"^ High SheritF of the said County : In Consideration whereof I doe hereby obleidge myselfe and my heirs Execut'^'' and Administrators firmly by these p^'sents : to Indemnifie and Keej)e harmless the said Register concerning y'* Premises aforesaid In wittness whereof I have hereunto put my hand and seale this twenty sixth day of February in the sixth year of their Maj"''^ Reigne Annoq' Domj 169J Ac- knowledged before us by the above Ann Richbell to be her Act & deed the day and date above written. Ann Richbell It is believed to be the only Westchester County Court document of the kind of the seventeenth century which has come down regularly to a present represen- tative in interest of one of the parties to the original action. Its form being somewhat different from that now used, and showing the names of the Judges, Ju- rors, and Counsel, and the summary of the evidence, gives it great and curious interest. Verdict for Mrs. Richbell. " Westcheste' Countys Ss. Att a Court of Pleas held at Westchester for the said County Dec. y* 3''*, & fourth in the Eight year of his Majestie's Reigne, Annoq* Domj. 1696. Present The Honob'" James Graham, Judge, John Pell, John Hunt, Wm Barnes, Thos Pinkney, Esq"''. Maddam Richbell by Peter Chock Atturney Read the Pattent & Joynt"^* &c. L'pon which the Jury was Impanneld & Swore, viz. Edm*. Ward Jno. Bayly Gabriell Leggatt Joseph Hunt, Sen'' Thomas Baxter Charles Vincent James Mott Justis Pece. Joseph Lee Pub. Not". This lustrum' was Read at a publick Towne meeting at y"" Towne house of Rye the day and date above written, and their Answer was if they did not meddle or make with any Lands that belongs to M" Richbells Patent But at the same Time they was makeing a Generall Agreem' to Lay out and devide a parcell of Land the said Richbell Layeth Clame Too by virty of her said Pattent. Test Joseph Lee t" Comitt. Westchest'." This lustrum' is Recorded in the Records of the County of Westchest" in Booke N° B. Foleo, 168 : 169. The suit referred to was tried at the then County town of Westchester in December 1(596 and resulted in favor of Mrs. Richbell. The following is the verdict, which is printed from a copy certified by the Court clerk at the time, now in the writer's possession. 1 Thomas Bedient I Robt. Hustice Jun' I Wm Davenport John Barrett Roger Barton Thomas Shuite 1 Mr. Underbill Reads an ord' about the Line betweene this Province and Canniddecott and Pleads the Land in question not within this Governm' but in Canniddecott. Mr. Peter Cock^ Pleads that Joseph Lee' might be swore to give what Report he cann about the Surveigh of the now Surveyo'' Generall, who upon oath, saith, that he begun his Survey at or about Momoronock Bridge : * and soe Runn up by the River till till he Came where Umphry Underbill Lives, who made oppf>sition with Gunns, Stones, &c. and soe went no furtlier. (vert.) The Pattent with the rest of Papers needftill Given to the Jury, and the Sherrife Sworne to Keepe them from fire and candles &c. untill they bringe in their verdict, viz. The Jury find that Momorronack River is the bounds of Richbells Pattent ^ here the ffresh water flals into the salt in said River, and from thence a northerly line into the woods : and if the Tenn' in Possession be on the West side of said Line then wee find for the plaintive, otherwise for the Defendant. Joseph Lee, CI." It would have been of more interest still at this ' Jointure. 2 So in the original. 3 The County Register, and also Clerk of the Court. urchase. Coll. Heathcott Desired said Henery Fowler, this Deponent, to show him said Coll. Heathcott the bounds of the Indian purchase, that the said Henery ffowler this Deponent had purchased of the Indians Ann Hook, Woupa- topas, &c. for himself and others his neighbours • this Deponent further saith that Coll. Heathcott fur- ther said to him, I have purchased a tract of Land of the Heathen Joyning to your bounds ; this Deponent further saith that he went along with Coll. Heathcott and showed him his bounds of the land he had pur- chased of the Heathens for himself and neighbours, which was from the Head of Hutchinsons River a straight course to Brunksis River to a marked tree, which Coll. Heathcott acknowledged to be his Bounds of his Indian Purchase, and this Deponent further Saith that he hath no claim to any parts of the lands in y" Indian purchase or lands therein contained which the said Henery ffowler purchased for himself and neighbours adjoining to Coll. Heathcotts; and that he Doth not now Declare this truth either in hopes of loss or gain, or through any fear, or in hopes of gaining any favour or affection of any person what- soever, and further this Deponent saith not. Henery ftbwler. This Deponent being about Seventy four years of age was sworn before me ye date aforesaid. Sworn before me one of his Majesties Justices of the peace for Westchester County. John Ward, Justice.* In 1G96, the year before Colonel Heathcote pur- chased from her the Mamaroneck lands, he obtained from Mrs. Richbell her written consent to his getting the usual deeds of Confirmation* from the then Indians of the neighborhood for the lands formerly bought from Wappaquewam and other Indians by her hus- band John Richbell. The above deeds seem also to have been obtained to remove any |)ossible claim to the Fox meadows from any jjartics whatever whether In- dians or whites. He also obtained on the eleventh of June 1701 from the same Indians Patthunke, Beo- po, and Wapetuck a similar deed of confirmation for Richbells Mamaroneck two miles tract.* In the course of the same year and the next he ob- tained, with others in interest, similar Indian deeds of Confirmation for all the lands in the great "West," "Middle" and "East Patents" v,'hich together cov- ered all the county between the Manors of Cortlandt on the north, I'hilipsburgh on the west, Scarsdale on the south, and the Connecticut line on the east. 3 From an ancient cop.v of the original in the writer's poeeesslon. < Before explained in this essay. 5 West. Co. Records Lib. D 52. 152 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. a short account of which will be given in another coflnection. At the time of his purchase from Mrs. Ann Rich- bell of the entire estate and rights in her Mamaro- neck and Scarsdale lands, in 1697, Colonel Heathcole was residing at Westchester, which the year before, through his influence, had been created a Borough- Town, with all its municipal privileges of a Mayor and Aldermen and Assistants, and the additional one of a representative of its own in the Assembly of the Province,' its charter, by which he was named its first Mayor, bearing date April 16th, 1696. He was a merchant in New York, where he also had a town residence, and a member of the Council of the Prov- ince. He had been a property holder in both West- chester and Eastcliester, from about the time of his coming from England to New York, which was in 1691. Being a man of education and means and of affable manners, he took a prominent part in the af- fairs of both settlements, and, in accordance with the popular wish, Avas appointed Colonel of the Military of the whole County. Hence the title of " Colonel," by which he was ever afterwards known, and spoken of, notwithstanding the many higher and more dis- tinguished positions and appointments he afterwards held, one of which was the judgeship of Common Pleas of the County, which he filled at the same time he was colonel of its militia. Succeeding to all the Richbell estate in the East Neck, including the proprietaiy rights in the town- ship tract of Mamaroneck, after obtaining the Indian confirmations and other deeds for the lands, and ac- quiring those from the head of Hutchinson's River to the Bronx, he had the whole erected into the Manor of Scarsdale under the Manor Grant above set forth in 1701. Upon an eminence at the head of Mamaroneck harbor, overlooking the two beautiful peninsulas forming its eastern and western sides, the blue waters of the wide Sound into which it opens, and the distant hills of Long Island, called from him to this day, " Heathcote Hill," Colonel Heathcote erected a large double brick Manor-House in the English style of that period, with all the usual offices and outbuild- ings, with the purely American addition, however, of negro quarters, in consonance with the laws, habits, and customs of that day. Here he dwelt during the remainder of his life. The people then living at Mamaroneck were very few. One of the first movements of Colonel Heathcote was to obtain the confirmation deed from the then Indian chiefs for Richbell's two-mile town- ship tract above referred to- This instrument, dated June 11th, 1701, not quite three months after he ob- tained his Manor-Graut of Scarsdale, gives us the names of the then owners of the tract which was di- 1 It and Schenectady were the only "Borough-Towns" erected in the Pro\nnce of New York. Both were perfect examples of the old English Borough-Towns in every respect. vided into eight house or home lots. It is executed by two Indian chiefs, Patthunk and Wapetuck, and confirms the tract " unto Collon.^' Caleb Heathcote, Capt. James Mott, William Penoir,^ John Williams, Henry Disbrough, Alice Hatfield, John Disbrough and Benjamin Disbrough.'" Henry Disbrough's deed from John and Ann Richbell, of 16th of February, 1676,* for his eighth part gives us the precise bound- aries of this tract, which it terms "Mammaroneck limmits," " being in length two miles and in Breadth one mile a half and Twenty-eight rods." * The object was to show that no difficulty with the natives might be apprehended by persons desirous of settling at Mamaroneck. Colonel Heathcote established a grist mill on the Mamaroneck River near the original bridge crossed by the "old Westchester Path," and a saw mill high up on that river, now the site of the present Mamaroneck Water Works, upon which site there continued to be a mill of some kind until it was bought two years ago to establish those works. He made leases at different points throughout the Manor, but did not sell in fee many farms, though always ready and willing to do so, the whole number of the deeds for the latter on record being only thirteen during the twenty-three years or thereabout which elapsed between his purchase from Mr. Richbell and his death. Some of these farms, however, were of great extent. He did not establish as far as now known any Manor Courts under his right to do so. The population was so scant, and the Manor like all others in the county, being subject to the judicial pro- visions of the Provincial Legislative acts, there was really no occasion for them. He personally attended to all duties, and matters, connected with his Manor and his Tenants, never having appointed any Steward of the Manor. Papers still in existence show that his Tenants were in the habit of coming to him for aid and counsel in their most private affairs, especially in the settlement of family disputes, and he was often called upon to draw their wills- But space will not permit mention of incidents and facts of only per- sonal or local interest, or of details of his general management of the Manor, or his agricultural management of his demesne lands, which included besides those attached to his Manor House the whole of that portion of the East Neck below the old West- chester Path now called De Lancey's Neck. Colonel Heathcote died very suddenly in the city of New York from a stroke of apoplexy on the 28th of February, 1720-21. In the Philadelphia American Weekly Mercury of March 11, 1721, is a letter from New York, under date of March 6th, which says, " On the 28th day of February last, died the Honorable Caleb Heathcote, Surveyor-General of His Majesty's 2 Penoyer was really this name. 3 Ancient copy in the writer's possession. Kec. Lib. C, West. Co., p. .52. < Lib. A, 33, West. Co. Kec. 6 The length was north and south, and the breadth east and west. Reproduced from the Engraving from the Original Painting in possession of the Rt. Rev. W. H. De Lancey, Bishop of Western New York. 1 « I THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 153 Customs for the Eastern District of North America,* Judge of the Court of Admiralty for the Provinces of New York and New Jersey and Connecticut, one of His Majesty's Council for the Province of New York, and brother of Sir Gilbert Heathcote of London. "He was a gentleman of rare qualities, excellent temper, and virtuous life and conversation, and his loss lamented by all that knew him, which on the day of his death, went about doing good in procuring a charitable subscription in which he made great progress." He was buried in his " family burial- place" in Trinity church yard, where his widow and three of his children who died young are also buried. His grave was in the church yard, almost beneath the southwest window of the second Trinity Church.'' His widow Martha survived him till August 18th, 1736, when she died, and was buried in the same place the evening of the next day.' She was the daughter of Colonel William Smith, of St. George's Manor, Long Island, Chief Justice and President of the Council of New York. He had previously been Governor of Tangiers, in Africa, while it was an appanage of the British crown, where his daughter, Martha Heathcote, was born on the 11th of September, 1681. Colonel Caleb Heathcote was the sixth son of Gil- bert Heathcote, Mayor of Chesterfield, Derbyshire, England, by his wife, Anne Chase Dickens. He was born in his Father's house in that city, still standing, in 1665. He was the sixth of seven sons who lived to maturity — Gilbert, John, Samuel, Josiah, William, Caleb and George. Of these, who all became suc- cessful merchants in England and foreign countries, three — John, William and George — died unmarried, the latter at sea in 1678, in his thirtieth year. Josiah's family line became extinct in August, 1811, while the families of Gilbert, Samuel and Caleb con- tinue to this day, but the latter only in the female line. Gilbert, the eldest, was Lord Mayor of Lon- don, Member of Parliament, one of the founders and the first Governor of the Bank of England, knighted by Queen Anne, and created a Baronet in 1732 by George XL His grandson of the same name was raised to the Peerage in 1856, as Baron Aveland, of Aveland, in the County of Lincoln, and his great grandson is the present Lord Great Chamberlain of England. Samuel, the third sou, who made a large fortune at Dantzic, was the ancestor of the Heath- cotes, Baronets, of Hursley Park, in the County of Hampshire ; his son William having been created a Baronet in 1733, and his great grandson was the late ' The commission appointing him to this office is in the writer's pos- session. It is an enormous parchment ilocument dated, 1715. 'Tliis fact was told tlie writer by liis Father, the Rt. Rev. William H. De Lancey, who was (ohl it and shown the place hy his father, John Peter De Lancey, of ilamaroncck, a grandson of Colonel Heathcote. All stones were destroyed when the Firet Trinity was burned, Sept. 15, 1776. » Xfw York Gaietle, No. 564,of 23 Aug., 1736. Right Honorable Sir William Heathcote, Bart., of the Privy Council, late Member of Parliament for the University of Oxford, the pupil and warm friend of the poet Keble, whom he preferred to the Rectorship of Hursley, which will ever be as famous as that of George Herbert at Bemerton, and father of Sir Wil- liam Heathcote, the sixth and present Baronet. Caleb, the sixth son, left six children — Gilbert and William and four daughters : Anne, Mary, Martha and Elizabeth. Three of these — AVilliam, Mary and Elizabeth — died young. Gilbert, while a youth of twenty, co mpleting his education in England under the care of his Uncle Gilbert, took the small pox and died, and is buried in that city. Anne, the eldest daughter, married James de Lancey (born 1703, died 1760), eldest surviving son of Etienne — in Eng- lish Stephen — de Lancey, the first of that family in America, subsequently Chief Justice and Governor of the Province of New York, of whom the late Rt. Rev. William Heathcote de Lancey (born 1797, died 1865) was the eldest surviving grandson, and the father of the writer of this essay. Martha, the only other child of Colonel Caleb Heathcote, who came to ma- turity, married Lewis Johnston, of Perth Amboy, New Jersey, and left two sons — John L. and Heath- cote — and two daughters — Anne and Margaret. The line of Heathcote Johnston is now extinct, and that of John L., it is said, is now extinct in the males. Anne married William Burnet, son of Governor Bur- net of New York, and grandson of the famous Bishop Burnet of King William's and Queen Anne's day, but this line is also extinct. Margaret, the other daugh- ter of Martha Heathcote Johnston, married Bowes Read, a prominent and distinguished public man of New Jersey, and her grandson was the late Rt. Rev. Charles P. McUvaine, Bishop of Ohio, who has many descendants. The Father of Colonel Heathcote, Gilbert the Mayor of Chesterfield, was a Roundhead in the English Civil War, and served with credit in the Army of the Par- liament against King Charles the First. He died in 1690 and lies in the burial place of the Heathcoteson the north side of the altar rails, in the ancient Parish Church of Chesterfield, the cruciform church 600 years old, with the central twisted spire 230 feet high and 14 feet out of the perpendicular, yet per- fectly secure, which, like the Leaning Tower of Pisa, is a puzzle whether it was or was not so erected origi- nally. Against the wall of the chancel arch is a very handsome mural monument in the ornamented style of the 16th century, erected jointly by all his sons to his memory bearing this inscription ; At the foot of this here lieth, in hopes of a blessed resurrection, the body of Gilbert Heathcote late of this town. Gentleman, who departed this life the 24"' April, 1690, in the 69"" year of his age. 154 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. By his wife Ann, daughter of Mr George Dickens of this town he had eight sons and one daughter, viz. Gilbert, John, Samuel, Elizabeth, Josiah, William Caleb, George, and Thomas ; of which Elizabeth and Thomas died in their infancy; but he had the particular blessing to see all the rest Merchants adventurers, either in England or in foreign parts. This was erected by his sons, as well to testify their gratitude, as to perpetuate the Memory of the best of fathers. Here also lieth interred the body of Ann, his said wife, who departed this life the 29th of November, 1705 in the 76th year of her age. The family was an ancient one, the first of whom there is authoritative mention having been a Master of the Mint under Richard II. The Arms were Ar- gent, three Pomeis, each charged with a cross or. And for Crest, on a wreath of the colours, a mural coronet azure surmounted with a Pomeis charged with a cross or, between two wings displayed, ermine. Motto : Habere et Dispertiri.' Colonel Heatlicote singularly enough was Mayor of the City of New York in 1711 to 1714 at the same time that his elder brother Gilbert was Lord Mayor of Lon- don. He was one of the strongest and most active Churchmen of his day. To him was the Church of England in New York and in Westchester County in- debted for its foundation and growth more than to any other one man. He formed an organization of a few churchmen in the City of New York termed the Managers of the Church of England in New York, of which he was the chairman. This was the body which took the earliest steps to establish an English Church in that city which event- ually became the well known " Parish of Trinity Church," subsequently the Mother Church of all the earlier churches in the city and to a large extent of those in the State of New York. Heathcote was the moving spirit and the active man in the whole move- ment, a fact which being fully admitted by them has drawn down upon him the ire of many writers of dissenting bodies of Christians. He also was the leading man in founding the parishes of Westchester East Chester, and Rye, in the County of Westchester to all of which he contributed his efforts and his means. His Manor of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck formed one of the precincts of the Parish of Rye,- 1 On the 2d of December, 1708, at the rerinest of Gilbert and his brothers, these arms were confirmed, with the change of the shield from argent to ermine, by the Herald's College of England. 2 See ante p. 99 for the facts of the establishment of the Church of England and its parishes in Westchester County. of which he was elected by the inhabitants a warden and vestryman. And from it he and the Rector of Rye, the Rev. George Muirson, went forth upon those Missionary tours which first brought the knowledge of the Church of England into the then benighted Colony of Connecticut, of which he has left us reports so full that to them friends and foes have gone for the most authentic account of men and affaire at that day in that Colony. So strong was the opposition and savage the threats, that he always went fully armed to defend both Muirson and himself In consequence of the death of all his children ex- cept Ann, Mrs. de Lancey and Martha, Mrs. Johnston, his entire estate, real and personal, descended to those ladies in equal shares. By Indentures of lease and release dated the 1" and 4"' days of July 1738 Lewis Johnston and Martha his wife conveyed her undivid- ed half part of her Father's estate to Andrew John- ston a relative of her husband. And he by deed dated July 7"" 1738 reconveyed it to Lewis Johnston and his heirs in fee. This was for the easier manage- ment only. By James de Lancey and wife and Lewis Johnston jointly, were all the lands in the Manor sold and conveyed, or leased, up to the death of James de Lancey on the 30th of July 1760. He died intestate, and Mrs. de Lancey's share of the Manor thereupon reverted to her alone absolutely in fee. From that time to 1774 all deeds and leases ran jointly in the names of Anne de Lancey and Lewis John- ston, they holding the estate jointly in fee. During this period a great deal of the Manor was sold, both to tenants and strangers. The former were always given the first right to purchase their farms in fee, and no farm was ever sold to strangers except with the tenants' assent, notwithstanding the proprietors were not bound to do so. In 1773 Anne de Lancey and Lewis Johnston determined to have a partition of all the lands in the Manor that remained unsold, and proceedings to that end were begun under the act of the Provincial Legislature of 1762, for that purpose. But before they had gone very far Dr. Johnston died. The Pro- ceedings were therefore begun anew in the names of Anne de Lancey and the Heirs of Lewis John- ston. These Proceedings in Partition were instituted under " An Act for the more effectual collection of his Majesty's Quit-rents in the Colony of New York and for the Partition of Lands in order thereto " passed the 8th of January 1762, and of another amendatory Act passed the 30th of December 1768. The original Petition was in the name of Lewis Johnston ; after his death his children were substituted in his place. They were Heathcote Johnston, John I Burnet, Anne Burnet, Bowes Reed and Margaret Reed. The other party in both Petitions was of course, Anne de Lancey. The Commissioners to make the partition were, Philip Pell, Jacobus Bleecker, and William Sutton, " all of the County of Westchester." THE ORIGIN AND HISTOllY OF THE MANORS. 155 A fter the proper advertisements had been published the proper time in Rivington's New York Gazetteer and Holt's New York Journal, two of the newspapers of the da}', the Commissioners met to organize " at the house of Thomas Beslj' in New Rochelle " on the oth of April 1774. Philip Pell, .Ir , was appointed clerk. The Commissioners and ch'rk were sworn in by Judge Tiiomas Jones of the Supreme Court ^ who attended for the purpose, and delivered to each a certificate of their appointment, signed by himself. The Commis- sioners ordered a notice that they would proceed to make the survey and partition on the (ith of June 1774, to be published, and also to be served on Alexander Colden, Surveyor-General. This notice, with a full description of the lands, was published weekly for six weeks in Rivington's New York Gazetteer and Holt's New York Journal. On the Gth of June 1774 the Com- missioners met at the house of William Sutton, on what is now De Lancey's Neck, accordingly. William Sut- ton was the leading man of his day at Mamaroneck. He was one of the Commissioners, and had been the tenant of De Lancey's Neck for a great many years pre- viously and continued such to his death about the close of the Revolutionary war. He knew every one of note in the County, and was as thoroughly accpiainted with the Manor lands in general as he was with those he himself had in cultivation. Jacobus Bleecker was a prominent resident and land holder of New Rochelle, and the grandfather of the late Anthony J. Bleecker, the well known Real Estate Auctioneer of New York. Philip Pell was of the old manorial family of the Pells of Pelham, and Philip Pell, Jr., the clerk was his oldest son. All were persons thoroughly acquainted with the extent, situation, and value, of the Heathcote estate, and the Manor of Scarsdale. " Sutton's House " long the farm house of the Neck, stood near, and a littlesouth westof, the new farm house built about 1844, by the late Mr. Thomas J. de Lancey, which is now a part of the house standing at the angle of Mamaroneck and Long Beach Avenues, re- cently bought of the James Miller estate by Mr. J. A. Bostwick. At the meeting at Sutton's on the (jth of June 1774, the clerk reported that he had served Surveyor-General Colden with notice on the 2nd of the preceding May. The Commissioners then ap- pointed Charles Webb, at that time and for thirty years after, one of the best Surveyors of the Province and State, Surveyor to make the Survey under oath, which was duly administered to him, and also to Joseph Purdy and Gilbert Robinson as chain bearers and Doty Doughty as " flagg carrier," and then they adjourned to the next day, the 7"^. when the survey was begun. It was carried on daily till nearthe middle of the following August, on the l(jth of which month. Maps, Field books, and Joiu-nals of the Commissioners, were duly signed in triplicate, one copy of each of 'The autlior of tlie " History of New York iluriug the Revolutionary War." which was filed in the ofBce of the Secretary of the Province, one in the clerk's office of Westchester County, and one retained by the owners. On the 25th of August notice of the filing, and appointing the 11th of October 1774 as the day of balloting for the lots as surveyed, was ordered advertised in the pajiers. On the 4th of October notice to John Harris Cruger to attend the balloting as one of the Council of the Pro- vince was served. On the 11th of October the Com- missioners and Cruger met in New York at Hull's Hotel, in Broadway, on the site of which now statids the " Boreel Building," and the drawing took place. The Survey and Map, a reduced copy of the latter of which is annexed, divided all the unsold lands then, in 1774, remaining in the possession of Colonel Heath- cote's heirs, into three divisions, the North, the Mid- dle, and the South Divisions, designated by the number of the respective lots in each. The balloting was thus effected, a boy blindfolded, one John Wallisby name, was appointed to draw the numbers of the lots, and the names of the parties. to whom they fell. He drew the lots in the different divisions seriatim, beginning at the north division, taking out first a ticket with the number of the lot, and then one with the name of an owner. The latter tickets bore either the name of "Anne de Lancey," or the words "The Heirs of Lewis Johnston." After the whole was completed the proceedings were duly certified to in triplicate, by the Commissioners, and each copy duly approved by the signature of John Harris Cruger, as the Councillor of the Province, present. The Map gives the perimeter of the whole Manor, antl those of some of its interior parts, besides the un- sold portions included in the partition, necessary to a right understanding of the latter. The portions left blank are those parts of the Manor which had ])revious- ly been sold by the Proprietors. It also shows the "Great Lotts" or the " Long Lotts " being those in the northern part of the township Tract which Colo- nel Heathcote and the other owners had so laid out in 1706, in the former's lifetime, and also the short lots at their southern end, all of which took up the whole of that tract northward and beyond the home lots, to the township line. The latter are not shown. Colonel Heathcote had in 1708, and in 1716 long after hisManor- Grant, and at other later times, bought several parts and parcels of the original home lots as Richbell had laid them out, which in the course of time had been divided up by their owners. All these were either owned separately in 1774, by his heirs, or had been previously disposed of by them, the two extremely small ones fronting on the Westchester path or Bos- ton road being all that were in joint ownership at the date of the partition. The accompanying map being on so small a scale gives only a very general idea of the Manor, without showing the details on the original maps, which are all very large. From the respective owners who recciveil their par- ticular lots under this final partition of the Manor 156 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Lands of Scarsdale in fee, have those lands passed to the great number of parties now owning and occupy- ing them, with, of course, all the rights and privileges of all lauds granted by the Crown of England prior to the 14th of October 1775, and guaranteed and con- firmed by all the successive constitutions of New York, both as an Independent Sovereignty, and as one of the United States. The Topography of the Manor of Scarsdale is pecu- liar, the Bronx and the Hutchinson rivers flow south- westerly from its northwestern part, the Mamaroneck river with its main affluent the Sheldrake, and its up- permost branches flows southeasterly into the Sound. It is well watered, hilly, and has singularly enough among the hills two or three extensive flat fertile plains. The valleys between the hills are beautiful and some of them very deep. The country is well wooded and the " Saxton Forest," formerly 300 acres, though much reduced in size, is still one of the largest single forests in the county. The drives are exceedingly fine, abounding with great and varied beauty. The soil is fertile and yields abundantly. In closing this chapter the writer regrets that space will not permit specific local details of the other Ma- nors in the county, as was the original intention, but having assented to the editor's request to permit a por- tion of the pages allotted him to be employed by oth- ers, it cannot be done. The manor grants for them are therefore only given. MANOR GRANT OF PELHAM. Thomas Dongan, Captain General and Governor- in-chief in and over the province of New Yorke, and the territories depending thereon in America, under his most sacred ]\Iajesty, James the Second, by tlie grace of Gad Kinge of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, defender of the faith, &c., — to all to whom these presents shall come, sendeth greeting : Whereas, Richard Nicolls, Esq., late governor of this province, by his certaine deed in writing, under his hand and seale, bearing date the sixth day of Octo- ber, in the eighteenth year of the reigne of our late sovereigne lord, Charles the Second, by the grace of God, of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, Kinge, defender of the faith, &c., and in the yeare of our Lord God one thousand six hundred sixty and six — did give, grant, confirme and rattefye, by virtue of the commission and authoritye unto him given by his (then) royal highness, James, Duke of Yorke, &c., (his now Majesty,) upon whome, by lawful grant and pattent from his (then) Majesty, the propriety and government of that part of the maine land, as well of Long Island and all the islands adjacent. Amongst other things was settled unto Thomas Pell, of Onk- way, alias Fairfield, in his Majestye's colony of Con- necticut — gentleman — all that certaine tract of land upon the maine lying and being to the eastward of Westchester bounds, bounded to the Westward with a river called by the Indians Aquaconounck, commonly known to the English by the name of Hutchinson's River, which runneth into the bay lyeing betweene Throgmorton's Neck and Anne Hooke's Neck, corn- only caled Hutchingson's Bay, bounded on the east by a brooke called Cedar Tree Brooke, or Gravelly Brooke ; on the south by the Sound, which lyeth be- tweene Longe Island and the maine land, with all the islands in the Sound not before that time granted or disspossed of, lyeing before that tract of land so bounded as is before expresst ; and northward to runne into the woods about eight English miles, the breadth to be the same as it is along by the Sound, together with all the lands, islands, soyles, woods, meadows, pastures, marshes, lakes, waters, creeks, fishing, hawking, hunting and fowling, and all other profl5tts, commodityes and heridetaments to the said tract of land and islands belonging, with their and every of their appurtenances, and every part and parcel thereof ; and that the said tract of land and premises should be forever thereafter held, deemed, reputed, taken and be an intire infranchised towne- shipp, manner and place of itself, and should always, from time to time, and at all times thereafter, have, hold and enjoy like and equall priviledges and immu- nities with any towne infranchised, place or manner within this government, &c., shall in no manner of way be subordinate or belonging unto, have any de- pendance upon or in any wise, bounds or the rules under the direction of any riding, or towne or towne- shipps, place or jurisdiction either upon the maine or upon Longe Island — but should in all cases, things and matters be deemed, reputed, taken and held as an absolute, intire, infranchised towneshipp, manner and place of itselfe in this government, and should be ruled, ordered and directed in all matters as to gov- ernment, accordingly, by the governour and Coun- cell, and General Court of Assizes — only provided, always, that the inhabbitants in the said tract of land granted as aforesaid, should be oblidged to send ffbr- wards to the next townes all publick pachquetts and letters, or hew and cryes coming to New Yorke or goeing from thence to any other of his Majestie's col- lonys ; to have and to hold the said tract of land and islands, with all and singular the appurtenances and premises, togaither with the privilidges, imuneties, franchises, and advantages therein given and granted unto the said Thomas Pell, to the proper use and be- hoofe of the said Thomas Pell, his heirs and assigns for ever, Ifully, ffreely and clearely, in as large and ample manner and forme, and with such full and absolute im- unityes and priveledges as before is expresst, as if he had held the same immediately ffrom his Majesty the Kinge of England, &c., and his suckcessors, as of the manner of Bast Greenwich, in the county of Kent, in free and common sockage and by fealtey, only yeald- eing, rendering and payeing yearely and every yeare unto his then royall highness, the Duke of Yorke and his heires, or to such governour or governoursasfrom time to time should by him be constituted and ap- poynted as an acknowledgement, one lambe on the THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 157 first day of May, if the same shall be demanded as by the said deede in writeing, and the eutrey thereof in the bookes of records in the secretarie's office for the province aforetiaid, may more fully and at large ap- peare. And whereas, John Pell, gentleman, nephew of the said Thomas Pell, to whom the lauds, islands and premises, with appurtenances, now by the last will and testament of him, the said Thomas Pell, given and bequeathed, now is in the actual, peaceable andquiett seazeing and possession of all and singular the premises, and hath made his humble request to mee, the said Thomas Dongan, that I would, in the behalf of his sacred Majesty, his heirs and suckces- sors, give and grant unto him, the said John Pell, a more full and firme grant and confirmation of the above lands and premises, with the appurtenances, under the scale of this his Majestie's province: Now Know Yee, that I, the said Thomas Dongan, by virtue of the commission and authority unto me given by his said Majesty and power in me being and residing, in consideration of the quitt rent hereinafter reserved, and for divers other good and lawfull considerations me thereunto mouving, I have given, rattefied and contirme and by these presents do hereby grant, rattefie and contirme unto the said John Pell, his heirs and as- signs for ever, all the before mentioned and rented lands, islands and premises, with the heridatements and appurtenances, priveledges, imuneties, tfran- chises and advantages to the same belonging and ap- pertaining, or in the said before mentioned deede in writing expresst, implyed or intended to be given and granted, and every part and parcell thereof, together with all that singular messuages, tenements, barnes, stables, orchards, gardens, lands, islands, meadows, inclosurcs, arable lands, pastures, feedeings, commons, woods, underwoods, soyles, quarreys, mines, min- nerally, (royall mines only excepted,) waters, rivers, ponds, lakes, hunteing, haucking, ffishing, ffowleing, as alsoe all rents, services, wasts, strayes, royaltyes, liberties, priviledges, jurisdictions, rights, members and appurtenances, and all other imunityes, royaltyes, power of franchises, profitts, commodeties and here- datements whatsoever to the premises, or any part or parcell thereof belonging or appertaining: and fur- ther, by vertue of the power and authority in mee being and residing, I doe hereby grant, rattefie and confirme, and the tract of land, island and premises aforesaid are, by these presents, erected and consti- tuted to be one lordship and manner — and the same shall henceforth be called the lordshipp and manner of Pelham ; and I doe hereby give and grant unto the slid John Pell, his heirs and assigns ffull power and authority at all times hereafter, in the said lordshipp and manner of Pelham aforesaid, one court leete and one court barron, to hold and keepe at such times so often yearly as he and they shall see meete, and all sines, issues and amerciaments at the said court leete and court barron, to be holden and kept in the man- ner and lordship aforesaid, that are payable from time to time, shall happen to be due and payable by and from any the inhabitants of or within the said lord- shipp and manner of Pelham abovesaid ; and also all and every the powers and authorities herein before mentioned, for the holding and keepeing of the said court leete and court barron, firom time to time, and to award and issue forth the costomary writts to be issued and awarded out of the said court leete and court barron, and the same to beare test and to be issued out in the name of the said John Pell, his heirs and assignes, and the same court leete and court barron to be kept by the said John Pell, his heirs and assignes, or bis or their steward, deputed or ap- poynted ; and I doe further hereby give and grant unto the said John Pell, his heirs and assignes, full power to distraine for all rents and other sums of money payable by reason of the premises, and all other lawful remedys and meanes for the haveing, re- ceiving, levying and enjoying the said premises and every part thereof, and all waifts, strayes, wrecks of the sease, deodauds and goods of fFellons, happening^ and being within the said manner of Pelham, with the advowson and right of patronage of all and every of the church and churches in the said man- ner, erected and to be erected — to have and to hold all and singular the said tract of land, islands and manner of Pelham, and all and singular the above granted or mentioned to be granted premisses, with their rights, members, jurisdictions, privileidges, heredaments and aj)purtenances, to the said John Pell, his heirs and assignes, to the only ])roper use, benefitt and behoofe of the said John Pell, his heirs and assignes forever; to be holden of his most sacred Majestye, his heirs and successors, in free and com- mon soccage, according to the tenure of East Green- wich, in the county of Kent, in his Majestye's king- dom of England, yielding, rendering and praying therefore yearly and every year forever, unto his said Majestye, his heirs and successors, or to such officer or officers as shall from time to time be ap- pointed to receive the same — twenty shillings, good and lawful money of this province at the citty of New Yorke, on the five and twentyth day of the month of March, in lieu and stead of all rents, ser- vices and demands whatsoever. In testimony whereof, I have signed these presents with my handwriting, caused the scale of the province to be thereunto affixed, and have ordained that the same be entered upon record in the Secretary's office, the five and twentyeth day of October, in the third yeare of the Kinge Majestye's reigne, and in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred eighty and seven.' Thomas Dongax. maxor-graxt of moriusaxia. William the Third, by the grace of God, of England , Scotland, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the lAlb. Book of Pat. No. ii. 306., Co. Bee. Lib. A., 240. 158 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Faith, &c., to all to whom these presents shall come, sendeth greeting : Whereas, the Hon'ble Edmond An- dross, Esq., Seigneur of Sausmarez, late governor of our province of New York, ikc, by a certain deed or patent, sealed with the seal of our said province of IJew York, bearing date the 25th day of March, in the year of our Lord 1676, pursuant to the commission and authority then in him residing, did confirm unto Col. Lewis Morris, of the Island of Barbadoes, a cer- tain plantation or tract of land laying or being upon the maine over against the town of Haerlem, com- monly called Bronckse's land, containing 250 margin or 800 acres of land, besides the meadow thereunto annexed or adjoining, butted and bounded as in the original Dutch ground brief and patent of confirma- tion is set forth ; which said tract of land and meadow, having been by the said Col. Lewis Morris long pos- sessed and enjoyed, and having likewise thereon made good improvement, he, ihe said Edmond Andross, late governor of our said province, did further, by the said deed or patent, sealed with the seal of our said prov- ince, and bearing date as aforesaid, we grant and con- firm unto the said Col. Lewis Morris, for his further improvement, a certain quantity of land adjacent unto the said tract of land — which land, with the addition, being bounded from his own house over against Haer- lem, running up Haerlem Eiver to Daniel Turner's land, and so along this said land northward to John Archer's line, and from thence stretching east to the land of John Richardson and Thomas Hunt, and thence along their lands southward to the Sound, «ven so along the Sound about southwest through Bronck's hill to the said Col. Lewis Morris' house — the additional land containing (according to the sur- vey thereof) the quantity of fourteen hundred and twenty acres, to have and to hold the afore-recited tract of land before possessed by him, and the addi- tional land within the limits and bounds aforesaid, to- gether with the woods and meadows, both salt and fresh waters and creeks, belonging to the said lands, unto the said Col. Lewis Morris, his heirs and assignees forever, under the yearly rent of four bushels of good winter wheat, as by the said deed or patent, registered in our secretary's office of our said province of New York, &c., — relation being thereunto had — may more fully and at large appear. And whereas, our loving subject, Lewis Morris, (nephew unto the said Col. Morris, lately deceased, his sole and only heir,) who is now, by right of descent and inheritance, peaceably and quietly seized and possessed of all the aforesaid tracts of land and premises within the limits and bounds aforesaid, hath,by his petition, presented unto our trusty and well beloved Benj. Fletcher, our Captain General and Governor-in-chief of our said province of New York and territories dependent thereon in America, Ac, prayed our grant and confirmation of all the afore-recited tracts and parcels of land and prem ises within the limits and bounds aforesaid ; and likewise that we would be graciously pleased to erect the said tracts and parcels of land, within the limits and bounds aforesaid, into a lordship or manor, by the name or title of the manor or lordship of Morrisania, in the county of Westchester ; and whereas, it is pub- licly manifest that the said Col. Lewis Morris, de- ceased, in his lifetime, and our said loving subject, his nephew and sole and only heir since bis decease, have been at great charge and expense in the purchasing, settling and improving of the said tracts and parcels of land, whereon considerable buildings have likewise been made; and our said loving subject, being willing still to make further improvements thereon — which reasonable request, for his further encouragement, we being willing to grant; and know yee, that we, of our special grace, certain knowledge, and mere motion, we have given, granted, ratified and confirmed, and by these presents do for us, our heirs and successors give, grant, ratify and confirm unto the said Lewis Morris, his heirs and assignees, all the aforesaid tracts and parcels of land within the limits and bounds aforesaid, containing the quantity of one thousand, nine hundred and twenty acres of land, more or less, together with all and every the messuages, tenements, buildings, houses, out houses, barns, barracks, stables, mills, mill dams, mill howles, orchards, gardens, fences, pastures, fields, feedings, woods, underwoods, trees, timber, meadows, (fresh and salt) marshes, swamps and pools, |)onds, waters, water courses, brooks, rivulets, baths, inlets, outlets, islands, necks of land and meadow, peninsulas of land and meadow, ferries, passages, fishing, fowling, hunting and hawking, quarries, mines, minerals, (silver and gold mines ex- cepted,) and all the rights, liberties, privileges, juris- dictions, royalties, hereditaments, benefits, profits, advantages and appurtenances whatsoever to the afore-recited tracts, parcels and necks of land, and mill, within the limits and bounds aforesaid belonging, ad- joining, or in any way appertaining, or accepted, re- puted, taken, known or occupied, as part, parcel or member thereof, to have or to hold all the aforesaid recited tracts and parcels of land within the limits and bounds aforesaid, containing the quantity of one thou- sand nine hundred and twentj' acres of land, more or less, together with all and every the messuages, tene- ments, buildings, houses, out houses, barns, barracks, stables, mills, mill dams, mill houses, orchards, gar- dens, fences, pastures, fields, feedings, woods, under- woods, trees, timber, meadows, tresh and salt, marshes, swamps, pools, ponds, waters, water courses, brooks, rivers, rivulets, streams, creeks, coves, harbors, bridges, baths, strands, inlets, outlets, islands, necks of land and meadow, peninsulas, land and meadow, ferries, passages, fishing, fowling, hunting and hawk- ing, quarries, mines and minerals, (silver and gold mines excepted,) and all the rights liberties, privileges, jurisdictions, royalties, hereditaments, tolls, and bene- fits, profits, advantages, and appurtenances whatso- ever, to the afore recited tracts, parcels and necks of land and mill within the limits and bounds aforesaid be- THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 159 longing, adjoining, or in any appertaining or accepted, reputed, taken, known unto bini, tlic said Lewis Morris, his heirs and assinees, to the sole and only proper use benefit and behoof of him the said Lewis IMorris, his heirs and assinees forever, and moreover, that if our further special grace, certain knowledge, and mear motion, we have brought it according to the reasonable request of our said loving subject to erect all the the aforerecited tracts and parcels of land and i)renuses within limits and bounds aforesaid into a lordship and manor, and therefore, by these presents, we do, for us, our heirs and successors, erect, make and constitute all the afore-recited tracts and parcels of land within the limits and bounds afore- mentioned, together with all and every the above granted premises, w'ith all and every of their appurte- nances, unto one lordship or manor, to all intents and purposes, aud 'tis our royal w'ill and pleasure, that the said lordship and manor shall from henceforth be called the lordship or manor of Morrisania ; and know yee, that we reposing especial trust and confidence in the loyalty, wisdom, justice, prudence, and circum- spection of our said loving subjects, do, for us, our heirs and successors, give and grant unto the said Lewis Morris and to the heirs and assignees of him the said Lewis Morris, full power and authority at all times forever hereafter, in the said lordship or manor, one court leet, and one court-barrou, to hold and keep at such time and times, and so often yearly as he or they shall see meet, and all fines, issues and amerciaments, at the said court-leet and court barron, to be holden within the said lordship or manor, to be set, forfeited or employed, or payable or happening at any time to be payable by any of the inhabitants of or in the said h)rdship or manor of Morrissania, or the limits and bounds whereof, and also all and every of the power and authority therein-before mentioned, for the hold- ing and keei)ing the said court-leet and court barron from time to time, and to award and issue out the said accustomary writs, to be issued and awarded out of the said court-leet and court barron, to be kept by the heirs and assinees of the said Lewis Morris, forever, or their or any of their stewards deputed and ap- pointed with full and ample power and authority to distraine for the rents, serveses, and other sums of money, payable by virtue of the premises and all other lawful remedies and means, for the having, pos- sessing, recovering, levying and enjoying the prem- ises, and every part and parcel of the same, and all waifes, estrages, meeks, deadodans, goods or felons, happening and being forfeited within the said lord- ship or manor of Morrissania, and all and every sum and sums of money to be paid as a post fine, upon any tine or fines to be levied, of any bounds, tene- mi nts or hereditaments within the said lordship or manor of Morrissania, together with the advowson and right of patronage, and all and every the church and churches erected or established, or thereafter to be erected or established within the said mauor of Morrissania, and we do also give and grant unto the said Lewis Morris, his heirs and assinees, that all and each of the tenants of him the said Lewis Morris, within the said manor, may at all times hereafter, meet together and choose assesors, within the manor aforesaid, according to such rules, ways and methods, as are prescribed for cities, towns and counties within our province aforesaid, by the acts of general assem- bly for the defraying the jiublic charge of each re- spective city, town and county aforesaid, and all such sums of money assesed or levied, to dispose of and collect for such uses as the acts of the general assem- bly shall establish and appoint, to have and to hold, possess, and enjoy, all and singular the said lordship or manor of Morrissania and premises, with all their and every of their appurtenances, unto the said Lewis Morris, his heirs and assinees forever, to be holden of us, our heirs and successors, in free and common socage, according to the tenure of our manor of East Greenwich, in our county of Kent, within our realm of England, yielding, rendering and paying therefor, yearly and every year, on the feast day of the Annun- ciation of our blessed virgin, unto us, our heirs and successors, at our city of New York, the annual rent of six shillings, in lieu and stead of all former rents, dues, services and demands whatsoever, for the said lordship and manor of Morrissania, and premises : in testimony whereof, we have caused the great seal of the said province to be afiixed. Witnesse our trusty and well beloved Benjamin Fletcher, our capt. gen. and gov. in-chief of our province of New York, and the territories and tracts of land depending thereon, in America, and vice-admiral of the same, our lieu- tenant commander-in-chief of the militia and of all the forces by sea and land within our colony of Con- necticut, and of all the forts and places of strength w'ithin the same, in council at our fort in New York, the 8th day of May, in the ninth year of our reign, Anno Domini, 1697.' By command of his excellencey. Bex. Fletcher. David Jamieson, Sec'y. MANOR-GRANT OF FORDHAM. Francis Lovelace, Esq., one of the gentlemen of his Majestie's Hon'ble Privy Chamber, and Governor- General under his Royal Highness, James, Duke of York and Albany, and of all his territories in Amer- ica, to all to whom these presents shall come, sendeth greeting: Whereas, there is a certain parcel or tract of land within this government, upon the main conti- nent, situate, lying and being to the eastward of Har- lem River, near unto ye passage commonly called Spiting Devil, upon which land ye new dorj/or villnge is erected known by the name of Fordham — ye utmost 1 Lib. tU. of Patents, Albany. 160 HISTOEY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. limits of the whole tract or parcel of land beginning at the high wood land that lyes due northwest over against the first point of the main land to the east of the island Pepirinhnan — there where the hill Moskuta is — and soe goes alongst the said kill, the said land striking from the high wood land before mentioned east soutlieast, till it comes to Bronk's, his kill ; soe westward up alongst ye main land to the place where Harlem Kill and Hudson River meet, and then forth alongst Harlem Kill to the first spring or fountain, keeping to the south of Crabb Island ; soe eastward alongst Daniel Turner's land, the high wood land, and ye land belonging to Thomas Hunt ; and then to Bronk's Kill afore mentioned, according to a survey lately made thereof by the surveyor-general — the which remains upon record ; all which said parcel or tract of land before described being part of the land granted in the grand patent to Hugh O'Neal, and Mary his wife, purchase was made thereof, by John Archer, from Elyas Doughty, who was invested in their interest as of the Indian proprietor, by my approba- tion, who all acknowledge to have received satisfac- tion for the same : and the said John Archer having, at his own charge, and with good success, begun a township in a convenient place for the relief of strangers, it being the road for passengers to go to and fro from the main, as well as for mutual intercourse with the neighboring colony, for all encouragement unto him, the said John Archer, in prosecution of the said design, as also for divers other good causes and con- siderations : know yee, that by virtue of ye commis- sion and authority unto me given by his royal high- ness, upon whom, by lawful grant and patent from his majestic, the propriety and government of that part of the main land, as well as Long Island, and all the islands adjacent, amongst other things, is settled, I have given, granted, ratified and confirmed, and by these presents do give, grant, ratify and confirm to ye afore mentioned John Archer, his heirs and assignees, all the said parcel or tract of land butted and bound- ed as aforesaid, together with all the lands, soyles, woods, meadows, pastures, marshes, lakes, waters, creeks, fishing, hawking, hunting and fowling, and all ye profits, commodityes, emmoluments and heredita- ments to the said parcel or tract of land or premises belonging or in any wise appertaining, and of every part and parcel thereof ; and I doe likewise grant unto ye said John Archer, his heirs and assignees, that the house which he shall erect, together with ye said par- cel or tract of land and premises, shall be forever hereafter held, claimed, reputed, and be an entire and enfranchised township, manor and place of itself, and shall always, from time to time, and at all times hereafter, have, hold and enjoy like and equal privi- leges and immunities with any town eniranchised or manor within this government, aud shall, in no manner of way, be subordinate or belonging unto, have any dependence upon, or in any wise be under the rule, order or direction of any riding, township, place or jurisdiction either upon the main or Long Island, but shall, in all cases, things and matters, be deemed, re- puted, taken and held as an absolute, entire, enfran- chised township, manor and place of itself in this government, as aforesaid, and shall be ruled, ordered and directed, in all matters as to government, by ye governor and his council, and ye general court of as- sizes, only always provided that the inhabitants of the said town, or any part of the land granted as aforesaid, shall be obliged to send forward to ye next town or plantation all public pacquetts and letters, or hue and cryes, comming to this place or going from it towards or to any of his majestie's colonies ; and I do further grant unto the said John Archer, his heirs and assignees, that when there shall be a suflicient number of inhabitants in the town of Fordham afore- mentioned, and the other parts of ye manor capable of maintaining a minister, and to carry on other public alfairs ; that then the neighboring inhabitants between the two kills of Harlem and Bronk's be obliged to contribute towards the maintenance of their said ministerand other necessary public charges that may happen to arise, and likewise that they be- long to the said town, according to the direction of the law, although their said farms and habitations be not included within this patent, to have and to hold ye said parcel and tracts of land, with all and singular the appurtenances and premises, together with the I^rivileges, immunities, franchises and advantages herein given aud granted unto the said John Archer, his heirs and assignees, unto the proper use and be- hoof of him, the said John Archer, his heirs and as- signees forever, fully, truly and clearly, in as large and ample manner, and from and with such full and absolute immunities and privileges as is before ex- pressed, as if he held the same immediately from his^ majesty, the King of England, and his successors, as of the manor of East Greenwich, in the county of Kent, in free and common soccage and by fealty, only yealding, rendering and paying yearly and every year unto his royal highness, the Duke of York and his successors, or to such governor and governors as from time to time shall by him be constituted and appointed,, as all acknowledgment and quit rent, twenty bushels of good peas, upon the first day of March, when it shall be demanded. Given under my hand, and. sealed with the seal of the province at Fort James,, in New York, on the island of Manhattan, this thir- teenth day of November, in the twenty-third year of the reign of our sovereign lord, Charles the Seccond, by the grace of God, of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, and Anno Domini, 1671. Francis Lovelace, manor-grant of philipseborough. William and Mary, by the grace of God, &c., king and queen of England, Scotland, France and Ireland,. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 160a defenders of the faith, &c., to uU to whom these pres- ents shall come, greeting: whereas, the Honorable Richard Nicolls, Esq., late governor of our Province of New York,.&c., by a certain deed or patent, sealed with the seal of our said Province, bearing date the 8th day of Oct., in the year of our Lord, 1GG6, pursu- ant to the authority in him residing, did give and grant unto Hugh O'Neale and Mary his wife, their heirs and assigns, all that tract of land upon the main, bounded to the north by a rivulet called by the In- dians, Meccackassin, so running southward to Nep- perhan, from thence to the kill Shorackkapock and to Paparinnomo, which is the southermost bounds, then to go across the country, eastward by that which is commonly known by the name of Bronx's river, together with all the woods, marshes, meadows, pas- tures, waters, lakes, creeks, rivulets, fishing, hunting and fowling, and all other profits, commodities and emoluments to said tract of land belonging, with their and every of their appurtenance, to have and to hold unto the said Hugh O'Neale and Mary his wife, their heirs and assigns forever, as by the said deed or pat- ent, relation being thereunto had, may more fully and at large appear, and whereas, the said Hugh O'Neal and Mary his wife, by their certain deed or writ, dated 30th day of Oct., in the said year of our Lord, 1666, did sell, alien, assign and set over all and singular their right and title and interest of in and to the aforenamed tract of land and premises, unto Elias Doughty of Flushing, in the Co. of York, on Long Island, unto the said Elias Doughty, his heirs and as- signs forever, as by the said deed or writing, relation being thereunto had, as may more fully and at large appear, and whereas, the said Elias Doughty by his certain deed or writing, bearing date 29 day of Nov., in the year of our Lord, 1672, for the consideration therein expressed and mentioned, did assign and set over, all and singular his right and title and interest, of, in and to the aforementioned tract of laud and premises unto Thomas Deleval, Esq., Frederick Phil- ips and Thomas Lewis, mariner, to hold to them, their heirs and assigns forever, as by the said deed or writ- ing relation being thereunto had, may more fully and at large appear ; and wlierea.s, the said Thomas Dele- val, in and by a certain codicil annexed unto his last will and testament in writing, bearing date the 10 day of June, in the year of our Lord, 1682, amongst other things did devise unto John Deleval his only son, all that his interest in the aforementioned land and premises, his one full, equal and certain third thereof, as by the said codicil in writing, relation being thereunto had, may more fully and at large appear; and, whereas, the Hon. Col. Thomas Dou- gan, late gov. of our said province &c., and as by a certain deed or patent, sealed with the seal of our said province, &c., and bearing date the 19th of Feb., in the year of our Lord, 1684-5, pursuant to the authority in him then residing, for the consideration therein expressed, did further grant, ratify and con- 11b firm, unto the said Thomas Deleval, Frederick Phil- ips, Geertje Lewis, relict of the said Thomas Lewis, due their heirs and assigns, all the aforesaid tract and parcel of land beginning at a small rivulet known and called by the Indians, Makakassin, from thence into the woods due east by a great rock stone and a lyne of marked trees, to Bronx's river, and thence by said river, four miles and something more, to a marked white oak tree upon the middle of a great ledge of rocks, which is the north-east corner of the land of Francis French & Co., in the mile square formerly sold out of the aforesaid patent, then by the said land, west, 35 deg. northerly, 1 mile or 80 chains from thence ea.st 35 deg. southerly to Bronx's river to a marked tree, which is the south-east corner of the mile square, excepted out of the said patent, from thence by Bronx's, his river, 89 chains to a marked tree, which is the north-east corner of Wm. Bettsand George Tippets, and tl>en by a certain lyne of marked trees due west 30 chains to the marked tree or south- east corner of the purchase of John Heddy, then due N. 34 chains, from thence due west by their purchase, 90 chains to the north-west corner of the 300 acres, then due south 16 chains to the north-west corner of the 20 acres purchased of John Heddy, thence and by the said land west 12 chains to the north-west cor- ner, then by the side of the kill, south 18 chains to the land of Wm. Betts and George Tipi)etts, from thence by a lyne of marked trees due west 79 chains, to a white oak tree standing on the bank of Hudson's river, to the south of Dog-wood brook 16 chains and } and then northerly by the Hudson's river to Nep- perha, which is near the Yonkers mills, and so con- tinue by Hudson's river to the first mentioned suiall rivulet, Maccakassin, the whole being bounded to the north with a lyne of marked trees and a great rock stone, to the east by Bronx's river and the land of Francis French and Co., to the south by the land of Wm. Betts, George Tippets and Thomas Heddy, to the west by Hudson's river, containing in all, 7,708 acres, together with all and singular the messuages, tenements, buildings, barns, stables, orchards, gar- dens, pastures, meadows, mills, mill-dams, runs, streams, ponds, rivers, brooks, woods, under-woods, trees, timber, fencing, fishing, fowling, hunting, hawking, liberties, privileges, hereditaments and im- provements whatsoever, belonging or in any way ap- pertaining, to have and to hold all the aforementioned tract and parcel of land, with all and singular the afoi'ementioned premises, unto the said John Deleval, Frederick Philips, Geertje Lewis, their heire and assigns forever, as by the said deed or patent reg- istered in our secretary's office of our province of New- York aforesaid, relation being thereunto had, may more fully and at large appear; and, whereas the said Thomas Deleval, by a certain deed of indenture, sealed with the seal, and bearing date the 27th day of August, in the year of our Lord, 1685, did, for the consideration therein mentioned, grant, bargain and 1606 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. sell, all that one full third part of all and singular the said tract of land, afore recited, described and bounded within the limits aforesaid unto him the said Freder- ick Philips one of the parties aforesaid, together with all that one full and equal third part of all and singu- lar the houses, out-houses, barns, stables, mills, mill- dams, buildings, fences and edifices thereon erected and built, and likewise one full third part of all and singular the waters, water-courses, streams, woods, underwoods, fishing, fowling, hawking, hunting, hereditaments and appurtenances to the same belong- ing, or in any way appertaining, to have and to hold unto the said Frederick Philipse, his heirs and as- signs forever, as by the said deed or indenture, relation being thereunto had, may more fully and at large ap- pear; and whereas, the said Geertje Lewis, executrix of the last will and testament of Thomas Lewis, late of New York, mariner, her late husband, deceased, and Lodivick Lewis, Barrent Lewis, Leonard Lewis, Katharine Lewis and Thomas Lewis the children and co-heirs of said Thomas Lewis and Geertje his wife, by a certain deed of indenture, sealed with the seal bearing date the 12 day of June, in the year of our Lord 1686, did, for the consideration therein mentioned, grant, bargain and sell, all that the full one-third part of all and singular the said tract of land afore-recited, described and bounded with the limits aforesaid, unto him, the said Frederick Phil- ips, one of the parties aforesaid, together with all that one full and equal third part of all and singular the houses, out-houses, barns, stables, mills, mill-dams, buildings, fences and edifices thereon erected and built, and likewise one full third part of all and singular the water, water-courses, streams, woods, underwoods, fishing, fowling, hunting, hawking, hereditaments and appurtenances to the same be- longing or in any wise appertaining, to have and to hold unto the said Frederick Philips, his heirs and as- signs forever, as by the said deed or indenture, rela- tion being thereunto had, may more fully and at large appear, and whereas, the Hon. Sir Edmund Audross, late governor of our said province of New York, &c., by a certain writing or patent, sealed with the seal of our said province, bearing date the first day of April, in the year of our Lord, 1680, pur- suant to the authority in him then residing, did give and grant unto the said Frederick Philips, a certain tract or parcel of land, beginning at a creek or river called by the Indians, Pocanteco or Wackandeco, with power thereon to set a mill or mills, with a due portion of land on each side, adjoin- ing unto the said river, lying within the bounds of the Indians land at Wickers creek, on the east side of the Hudson river, which said Indian land was by the said Frederick Philips purchased from the said native Indian proprietors thereof, by the licence and appro- bation of the said Sir Edmund Andross and the said Indian proprietors did, in the presence of Sir Edmund Andross aforesaid, acknowledge to have received full satisfaction of him the said Frederick Philips for the said land adjoining, to each syde of the creek or river aforesaid, which said land is situate, lying and being on each side of the said creek or river, north and south 1600 treads or steps which at 12 ft to the rod, makes 400 rod and runs up into the country so far as the said creek or river goeth, with this proviso or re- striction that if the creek or river called by the Indi- ans, Nippiorha, and by the charters Yonkers creek or kill shall come within the space of land of 400 rods on the south side of the aforenamed creek or river, that shall extend no farther than the said creek or river of Nippiroha, but the rest to be so far up into the country on each side of the said creek or river called Pocanteco as it runs, being about north-east, to have and to hold all the aforesaid recited tract or parcel of land unto him the said Frederick Philips, his heirs and assigns forever, as by the said grant or patent registered in our secretary's office of our province of New York, &c., aforesaid, relation being thereunto had may more fully and at large appear, and whereas the Honorable Thomas Uongan late gov. of our province of New York, &c., aforesaid, by virtue of the power in him then residing hath, by another grant or patent sealed with the seal of our said prov- ince of New York, and registered in our secretary's office of our province aforesaid, bearing date 23d of September, in the year of our Lord 1684, given, granted, ratified, and confirmed, unto said Frederick Philips, his heirs and assigns, several tracts and par- cels of land with the limits and bounds hereafter men- tioned, that were according to the usage, custom, and laws of our said province purchased by the said Fred- erick Philips from the native Indians and proprietors, in manner and form following, (that is to say,) all those certain parcels and pieces of land lying about the Wigquaskeek that was on the 24th day of October, in the year of our Lord, 1680, purchased by the said Frederick Pliilij)s of the Indian Goharius, brother of Weskora, sachem of Wigquaskeek, for himself and by the full order of Goharius, which certain parcel or parcels of land are lying about Wigquaskeek to the north syde and tending from the land of the aforesaid Frederick Philips running along the North river to the north of the small creek called by the Indians Sepackena creek, as far as it goeth into the woods, and coming to the end of the aforesaid creek, then shall the aforesaid pieces or parcels of land have their line north-east, or if the creek Pocanteco Wack- andeco upon which at present' stands the mills of the said Frederick Philips, shall run upon a north- east lyne, then the said land shall run along the said creek Pocanteco, or Weghkaudeco, into the woods as the said creek or kill shall go, and there shall be the end or utmost bounds of the said certain pieces of land, as by the said writing or Indian deed, relation being thereunto had may more fully and at large ap- 112 June, 1693. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 160c pear, as likewise another tract or parcel of land on the east side of Hudson's river that was by said Fred- erick Phiii|)s purchased of the Indians Goharius, Co- bus, and Tognuanduck, on the 23d day of April, in the year of our Lord, IfiSl, whi«h tract or parcel of land being situate on the east side of the North or Hud- son's river, beginning at the south side of a creek called Bissigktick, and so ranging along the said river northerly to the aforesaid land of the aforesaid Fred- erick Philips, and then alongst the said land north- east and by east until it conies to and meets with the creek called Nippiorha, if the said creek shall fall within that lyne, otherwise to extend no further than the head of the creek or kill called Potanteco, or Puegkanteko, and southerly alongst the said river Neppiorha if the same shall fall within the said line as aforesaid, or else in a direct lyne from the head of the said creek or kill called Pocanteco Puegkandico, untill it comes opposite to the said first mentioned creek called Bissightick, and from thence westwardly to the head of the said creek and alongst the same to the North or Hudson's river, being the first station, as by the said writing or deed, relation being thereunto had, may more fully and at large apiiear, as also another certain tract or parcel of land on the east syde of the said Hudson's river that was by the said Frederick Philips purchased of the native Indians Armaghqueer, Seapham alias Thapham, on the 8th day of April, in the year of our Lord 1(>82, which certain tractor par- cel of land is situate, lying, and being on the east side of the North or Hudson's river to the south of the land formerly bought by the said Frederick Phil- ips, of the said Indians, beginning at the south side of a creek called Bissightick, and so ranging along the said river southerly to a creek or fall called by the Indians Weghquegsik, and by the Christians Law- rcnces's plantation, and from the mouth of the said creek or fall upon a due east course to a creek called by the Indians Nippiorha, and by the Christians the Yonkers kill, and from thence alongst the west side of the said creek or kill as the same runs to the before mentioned land, formerly bought by the said Fred- erick Philips of the sayd Indians, and so along that land to the first station, as by the said writing or In- dian deed, relation being thereunto had, may more fully and at large appear, as also another tract or par- cel of land on the east side of Hudson's river that was by the said Frederick Philips purchased of the na- tive Indians Warramanhack, Esparamogh, Anhock, &c., on the fUh day of September, in the year of our Lord, 1682, which certain tract or parcel of land is situated, lying, and being on the west side of the North or Hudson's river, beginning at the north side of the land belonging to the Yonkers kill, Nipperha, at a great rock called by the Indians Mcghkeckassin, or the great stone, (as called by the Christians,) from thence ranging into the woods eastwardly to a creek called by the Indians Nipperha aforesaid, and from thence along said creek northerly till you come to the eastward of the head of a creek called by the Indians Wegquis- keek, being the utmost bounds of the said Frederick Philips's land, formerly bought of the Indians, and from thence westwardly along the said creek Weg- queskeek to Hudson's river aforesaid, as by the said Indian deed, relation being thereunto had, may more fully and at large appear, and also another tract or parcel of land that was by the said Frederick Philips purchased of the native Indians Sapham, Ghoharius, Kakingsigo, on the 7th day of May, in the year of our Lord, 1684, which tract or parcel of land is situate, lying, and being to the eastward of the land of the said Frederick Philips between the creek called Nippiorha, or the Yonkers kill, and Bronk's river, beginning on the south side at the northerly bounds of the Yonkers land, and from thence along the afore- said creek, Nippiorha, however it runs, till you come to the most northerly bounds of the said Frederick Philips's lands, and from thence north-east into the woods unto Bronk's river, as it runs southerly to the eastward of the Yonkers land aforesaid, and from thence with a westerly lyne to the aforenamed Yonkers kill, or Nippiorha, as by the said Indian deed, relation being thereunto had, may more fully and at large appear, all which several tracts and parcels of land within the several respective limits and bounds aforementioned, and purchased by the said Frederick Philips of all and every the respective native Indians aforesaid, in manner aforesaid, were by the said Thomas Dongan, late gov. of our province under the seal of our said province, bearing date as aforesaid, given, granted, ratified, and confirmed unto him, said Frederick Philips, his heirs and as- signs, together with all and singular the houses, buildings, messuages, tenements, and hereditaments, mills, null-dams, rivers, runns, streams, ponds, with liberty to erect other mills or dams, or places conve- nient, woods, underwoods, quarries, fishing, hawking, hunting, and fowling, with all liberties, priviledges, and improvements whatsoever to the said land and premises belonging or in anywise appertaining, to have and to hold all the aforesaid tract and tracts, parcel and parcels of land and premises with their and every of their appurtenances unto said Frederick Philips, his heirs and assignees forever, as by the said grant or patent sealed with the seal of our said [)rovince, and registered in our secretary's office of our said province bearing date 23d day of De- cember in the year of our Lord 1684, relation being thereunto had, may more fully and at large appear, and whereas the aforesaid Thomas Don- gan late Gov. of our said province, by virtue of the said power and authority in him residing hath moreover by another grant or patent sealed with the seal of our said province and registered in our secretary's office aforesaid bearing date the nth day of November, in the year of our Lord 1686, given, granted, ratified, and confirmed un- to Philip Philips, eldest son, of him the said HISTORY OF WE8TCHESTEE COUNTY. said moiety or equal half part of the said meadows and premises with the appertinences unto the said Frederick Philips, his heirs and assigns forever, as by the said grant or patent, sealed with the seal of our said province and registered in our secretary's office aforesaid, bearing date the said 27th day of June, in the year of our Lord, 1687, and as by the said deed of conveyance, under the hands and seals of the said George Lockhart and Janet his wife, bearing date 20th day of February, in the year of our Lord, 16.S5, relation being thereunto had respectively may more fully and at large appear ; and whereas Augustine Grayham our surveyor general for our said prov- ince of New York, &c., hath by warrant bearing date the 11th of February, in the fourth year of our reign, surveyed and laid out for the said Frederick Philips, a certain small parcel of salt meadows situate and being on the north side of Tappan creek in the county of Orange, beginning at a certain stake set on the east side of the said creek, and from thence run east 37° 40 min. northerly to Hudson's river six chains and ninety links, thence along the said river twelve chains and ninety links south one degree, westerly to the mouth of the aforesaid creek, and from thence along the said creek west five degrees thirty-five minutes, northerly eleven chains, thence north twelve degrees, eastwardly two chains and forty links, thence e.ist forty degrees, southerly three chains forty-five links along the said creek, thence east eleven degrees thirty minutes, southerly two chains twenty links, thence north six degrees twenty-five minutes, seven chains and seventy links, to the stake where the line first began, being bounded on the north-west by a certain parcel of Frederick Philips all that tract or parcel of land commonly called by the Indians Sinck Sinck, and situate, lying, and being on the east side of Hudson's river by the northermost part of the land purchased by the said Frederick Philips, and so running alongst Hudson's river to a certain creek or river called Kichtawan, and from thence running alongst the said creek two English miles, and from thence running up the country upon a due east lyne untill it comes unto a creek called Nippiorha, by the Christians Yonkers creek, and so running alongst the said creek un- till it comes unto the northerly bounds of the said land of Frederick Philijis aforesaid, and from thence alongst the said land untill it comes to Hudsons river, together with all manner of rivers, rivulets, ruuns, streams, feedings, pastures, woods, underwoods, trees, timbers, waters, water courses, ponds, pools, pits, swamps, moors, marshes, mea- dows, easements, profliits and commodities, fish- ing, fowling, hunting, hawking, mines, minerals, quarries, (royal mines only excepted) and all royalties, profits, commodities, hereditaments and api)urtenances whatsoever to the said tract or parcel of land within the bounds and limits aforesaid, be- longing or in any ways appertaining, to have and to hold the said tract or parcel of land and all and singular other the premises with their and every of their appurtenances, unto the said Philip Philips, his ' heirs and assigns forever, as by the said grant or [)atent, relation being thereunto had, may more fully and at large appear, and whereas the said Philip Philips did by mean assurance in the law, sell, alienate, enfeoft', and confirm unto his said father Frederick Philips all the afore-recited tract or parcel of land within the limits and boundsabove mentioned and expressed, together with all and singular the premises with their and every of their appertinences, j to have and to hold unto him the said Frederick Philips, his heirs and assigns forever, as by his deed of conveyance under his hand and seal bearing date j the day of in the year of our Lord lti8-, { relation being thereunto had more fully and at large appear; and whereas the aforesaid Thomas Dongan, late Gov. of our said province, by virtue of the said power and authority in him residing hath, by another grant or patent sealed with the seal of our said pro- vince and registered in our secretary's office aforesaid, bearing date the 27th day of June, in the year of our Lord, ]t)87, given, granted, ratified, released and con- firmed unto the said Frederick Philips all that the moiety or one equal half part of a certain entire parcel of meadow ground, situate, lying, and being at a certain place called Tappan near Hudson's river, bounded to the north by a certain creek called or known by the name of Tappan creek, to the east by Hudson's river aforesaid, to the west by a certain parcel of upland now in possession of George Lock- hart, and to the south by Hudson's river aforesaid, the said moiety or etjual half part of the said mea- dows to be laid out along the side of Hudson's river aforesaid throughout the whole length of its bounds upon said river from Tappan creek aforesaid, and to be bounded to the north by Tappan creek, to the east by Hudson's river, to the west by the other moiety or half part of the said meadows, still running to the said George Lockhart's, and so to run southerly to the end of the said meadows, nothing excepted or reserved thereof, to the said George Lockhart, his heirs or assigns, but one cart or waine way through the said moiety or half part of the meadow aforesaid, which moiety or equal half part of the meadow aforesaid was by mean assurance in the law conveyed to the said Greorge Lockhart and Janet his wife unto the said Frederick Philips, his heirs and assigns, to have and to hold the THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE MANORS. 160e meadow said to belong to Cornelius Claaler, on the east by Hudson's river on the south and west by the said creek, containing in all six acres three roods and eight perches, as by the return of the survey, bearing date the 19th day of April, in the said fourth year of our reign, and in the year of our Lord, lf)!>2, relation being thereunto had may more fully and at large ap- pear, all which several tracts or parcels of land lying together, and bounded and limited in manner hereaf- ter expressed and mentioned, (that is to say) all the said tract and parcels of land that are on theeastside of Hudson's river are bounded to the northward by a creek or river commonly called by the Indians Kigh- towank and by the English Knotrus river, and now belonging to Stevanus van Cortlandt, Esq., and so eastward into the woods along the said creek or river two English miles, and from thence upon a direct east line to Hronxes river, and so running southward along the said Hronxes river as it runs until a flirccl west line cutteth the south side of a neck or island ol land at a creek or kill called Papparinerao which di- vides York island from the main, and so along the said creek or kill as it runs to Hudson's river, which part of the said creek is cidled by the Indians Sho- rackhappok, and continues dividing the said York island from the main, and so from thence to the north- ward alongst Hudson's river uutill it comes into the aforesaid creek or river called by the Indians Kighta- wank and by the English Knotrus river and the salt meadow ground on the west side of Hudson's river, are bounded and limited as here before is plainly mentioned and expressed. And whereas our loving subject the said Frevements have been I made, and that he is likewise willing at his own proper I cost and charge to build a bridge at the ferry afore- i said for the benefit and accomnjodatioii of travellers, i which reasonable recpiest for his future encourage- I ment we being willing to grant. Know yr, that of our special grace, certain knowledge, and mere motion, we have given, granted, ratified, and confirmed, and by these presents do, for us, our heirs and succes.sors, give, grant, ratify, and confirm unto said Frederick Phil- ips, his heirs and assigns, all and every the aforere- cited tracts and parcels of land and meadow ground within the limits and bounds before mentioned and expressed, and likewise the aforesaid neck or island of land called Paparinemo, and the meadow there- unto belonging, with power, authority, and privilege to erect and build a dam bridge ui)on the aforesaid ferry at 8pitendevil or Paparinemo, and to receive rates and tolls of all passengers and for droves of cat- tle according to the rates hereafter mentioned, (that is to say,) three pence current money of New York for each man and horse that shall pass the said bridge in the day time, and threepence current money afore- said for each head of neat cattle that shall pass the same, and twelve pence current money aforesaid for each score of hogs, calves, and sheep that shall pass the same, and nine pence current money aforesaid for every boat, vessel, or canoe that shall pass the said bridge and cause the same to be drawn up, and for each coach, cart, or sledge, or waggon that shall pass the same the sum of ninepence current money afore- said ; and after sunset each passenger that shall pass said bridge shall pay two pence current money afore- said, each man and horse six pence, each head of neat cattle six pence, each score of hogs, calves, and sheep two shillings, for each boat or vessel or canoe one shil- lingandsix pence for each coach, cart,waggon or sledge one shilling and sixpence current money aforesaid, together with all the messuages, tenements, buildings, barns, houses, out-houses, mills, mill-dams, fences, or- chards, gardens, pastures, meadows, marshes, swamps, moors, pools, woods, under-woods, trees, timber, quar- ries, rivers, runs, rivulets, brooks, ponds, lakes, streams, creeks, harbours, beaches, ferrys, fishing, fowling, hunting, hawking, mines, minerals, (silver and gold only excepted,) and all the other rights, members, liberties, priviledges, jurisdictions, royalties, heredita- ments, proffits, tolls, benefits, advantages and api)ur- tinances whatsoever to the aforesaid tracts and neck or island of land and meadows, ferry, bridge, and mills belonging or in any ways appertaining, or ac- cepted, reputed, taken, known, or occupied as part, parcel, or member thereof ; and moreover, know ye, that of our further special grace, certain knowledge. 160/ HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. and mere motion, we have thought fit, according to the request of our said loving subject, to erect all the aforesaid recited tracts and parcels of lands and meadows with the limits and bounds aforesaid, into a lordship or manor, and, therefore, by these presents we do erect, make, and constitute all the aforesaid recited tracts and parcels of land and meadows, within the limits and bounds aforesaid mentioned, together with all and every the afore granted prem- ises with all and every of the appertinances into a lordship or manor, to all intents and purposes; and it is our royal will and pleasure that the said lordship and manor shall from henceforth be called the lord- ship or manor of Philipsborough, and the aforesaid bridge to be from henceforth called Kingsbridge in the manor of Philipsborough aforesaid. And knoif ye, that we, reposing special trust and confidence in the loyalty, wisd<(m, justice, prudence, and circum- spection of our loving subject, do, for us, our heirs and successors, give and grant unto the said Freder- ick Philips, and to the heirs and assignees of him the said Frederick Philips, full power and authority at all times forever hereafter in the said lordship or manor, one court leet and one court baron to hold and to keep at such times, and so often, yearly and every year, as he or they shall see meet; and all fines, issues, and amercements as the said Court Leet or Court Baron to be holden within said lordship or manor to be sett, forfeited, or employed, or payable, or happening at any time to be payable by any of the inhabitants of or within the said lordship or manor of Philipsborough, in the limits and bounds thereof, as also all and every of the power and authority herein before mentioned, for the holding and keeping the Said Leet and Court Baron from time to time, and to award and issue out the customary writs to be issued and awarded out of the said Court Leet and Court Baron to be kept by the heirs and assignees of the said Frederick Philips forever, in their or every of their stewards deputed and appointed, with full and ample power and authority to distrain for the rents, levies, or other sums of money payable by virtue of the premises, and all other lawful remedies and means for the having possession, receiving, levying, and en- joying the premises and every part and parcel of the same, and all waifes, estrays, wrecks, deodans, and of the fellons happening and being furnished within the said lordship and manor of Philipsborough, and all and every .sum and sums of money to be paid as a parte fine upon any fine or fines to be levied of any lands, tenements or hereditaments with in the said lordship or manor of Phil- )t'-% ipsburgh, togather with the advowson and right of patronage of all and every the church or churches erected or to be erected or estab - lished or hereafter to be erected or established within the said manor of Philipsborough ; and we do also further give and grant unto the said Frederick Philips, his heirs and assignees, that all and singular the tenants of the said Frederick Philips, within the said manor .shall and may at all times hereafter meet to- gether and choose assessors within the manor afore- said, according to such rules, ways, and methods as are prescribed for the cities, towns, and counties within our province aforesaid by the acts of General Assembly, for the defraying the publick charge of each respective city, town, and county aforesaid, and such sums of money so assessed or levied to collect and dispose of for such uses as the acts of General Assembly shall establish and appoint, to have and to hold, pcssess, collect, and enjoy all and singular the said lordship or manor of Philipsborough, togather with the aforesaid halls and premises, with all their and every of their appertinances, unto the said Fred- erick Philips, his heirs and assignees, to the only proper use, benefit, and behoof of him, the said Fred- erick Philips, his heirs and assignees forever, reserv- ing unto us, our heirs and successors, free egress and ingress of all our and their forces, horse or foot, of our and their coaches, waggons, stores of war, ammu- nition, and expresses, that shall from time to time pass the said bridge for our or their service, or any thing contained to the contrary' herein in any ways notwithstanding, to be holden of us, our heirs and successors, in free and common soccage according to the tenure of our manor of East Greenwich within our county of Kent in our realm of England, yeald- ing, rendering, and paying therefor, yearly and every year, on the feast day of the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, at our fort at New York unto us, our heirs and succes,sors, the annual rent of £4 128. current money of our said province in lieu and stead of all former rents, services, dues, duties, and demands for the said lordship or manor of Philips- borough and premises. In testimony whereof we have caused the seal of our province of New York to be hereunto affixed. Witne-is Benjamin Fletcher our captain-general and governor-in-chief of our province of New York aforesaid, province of Pennsylvania and countj' of New Castle, and the territory and tracts of land depending thereon in America, at Fort William Heary, the 12th day of June, in the fifth year of our reign, and in the year of our Lord, 1693.' ' Lib. vii. Sec. of State's off', Albany. THE COLONIAL PERIOD. 161 CHAPTER V. THE COLOXIAL PERIOD. UY KEV. WILLIAM S. COFFEY, M.A. Geneial History from 1(1X3 to the Revolution — Chief Families — Trade — Mails — Xewspapers — Modes of Travel — Kise of Churches — Inllwenco of tlic Clersy — Belatious of the County to the Colony — Early Census. In 1683, nine years after the surrender by the Dutch Government to the English of its Province of New Netherlands, the Duke of York (afterwards James the Second) sent over Colonel Thomas Dongan, brother of the Baron of that name in the Irish peerage, and himself afterwards Earl of Limerick, to be Governor of the colony, henceforward to be styled " New York." In the instructions to Dongan are to be noted, first, the naming of Frederick Philipse and Stephen Van Cortlandt, large landed proprietors in Westchester County, as members of his Council, and, second, the order to assemble eighteen representatives of the free- holders of the colony to consult with the Governor and his Council. Dongan arrived in August, and, in less than a month, summoned the people to elect rep- resentatives to the first Assembly, which he ordered to meet on the 17th of October, in the city of New York. Westchester County, being one of the three Ridings of Long Island, returned two members to this body, whose names, unfortunately, are not known, the acts of the old New York Assembly being, " for the most part, rotten, defaced or lost." ' An important law passed by this Assembly was the division of the prov- ince into twelve counties. The County of West- chester is marked out as " East and West Chester, Bronxland, Fordliam and all as far eastward as the province extends " and northward along tlie Hud- son to the Highlands. Acts bearing upon the inter- ests of this County were passed, establishing courts, repealing rate laws, for defraying expenses, for the de- struction of wolves, and providing for damages by swine, and also settling that Westchester should henceforth have two representatives in the Assembly.^ In the latter part of November, after an intimation from the Governor, that, unless there was an abatement of her claims, he would proceed to extremities, a del- egation from Connecticut was sent to New York to settle the boundary line between the two provinces. In the previous determination, in 1664, the under- standing drawn up in formal manner was, that the dividing Hue should runabout twenty miles from any point on the Hudson River, and, as Mamaroneck Creek was, on the assurance of the Connecticut com- missioners, discovered to be at that distance from the nearest locality on that river, an amendment was made that the western bounds of Connecticut should 1 Vide Brodhead, Hist, of N. T., vol. ii. p. 382. - Vide Dunlap, Hist, of N. Y., vol. ii. Ap. N. xliil. 11 find there their starting-point, and proceed in a straight direction north-northwest to the Massachusetts line. Little did the New York commissioners inuigine into what a blunder, in their confidence, they were being led. The mistake or deception was found out, and hence the necessity now for a new conference and de- cision. The commissioners present were the two Governors, Dongan and Treat, with Messrs. Brock- hoist, Philipse, Van Cortlandt and Younge for New York, and ]\Iessrs. Gold, Allyn and Pitkin for Connecticut. The mouth of the Byram River was settled as the boundary point, and, as not less than five towns (always regarded in Connecticut) would be thrown out of it by following this line, an equivalent tract, quantity for quantity (ever since called the "Oblong "), was, in consideration, assigned in lieu of the towns, to New York.' These lines, partitions, limits and bounds, it was resolved, should be run during the next October and the whole matter transferred to the King and Duke of York for their approval. The disposal of them thus made was exceedingly distasteful to the people of Rye and Bedford, and, notwithstanding a letter to them from the Connecticut govermnent urging the propriety of submission, was positively resisted. A summons of Gov- ernor Dongan to appear in New York and show title to their lands was disobeyed, and, event- ually, an open request to the General Court of Connecticut for recognition as belonging to the latter colony was made, the approval of the home govern- ment to the agreement being for years delayed. The result of this dissatisfaction was an open rupture on the occasion of the election of a member of the Gen- eral Assembly, in 1697, in which the sherift''s author- ity was disputed and an armed force from Connecticut interposed to prevent tiie accomplishment of the election. The course of these towns and the govern- ment of Connecticut received a practical rebuke when, in 1700, King William confirmed the agreement of 1683 and the action of the surveying party of the next year. The Assembly of Connecticut thereupon ordered that information of the fact be sent to the inhabitants of Rye and Bedford, and that they are freed from duty to that government, but are henceforth under the government of New York.* In the management of the affairs of the Province Dongan seems to have displayed the greatest energy and ability amid difficulties and disadvantages which sorely taxed his powers. One of his troubles, because it gives us a chance to look into Westchester, we re- call : The Duke of York's Collector (Santen) seems to have been so lax with his deputies that several of them were defaulters. Among these was one Collins, receiver of the revenue in Westchester County, from '"Bonndarics of tlie State of New York." Keport of the Regents of the Vnivcrsity, pp. iBaird's Kye, p. 118. Public Records of Connecticut, vol. iv. p. :i,35. 162 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. whom no returns having been made, Santen was com- pelled to be satisfied with two bonds, payable in the succeeding March. These Governor Dongan looked upon to be of no value and all the revenue of that county lost, " the man having hardly bread to put into his mouth." The Acts of - the New York Assembly of 1783 were duly transmitted for approbation to the Duke of York ; but although they were, with some amend- ments, approved by him and his Commissioners, and although the documents were signed and sealed which were to declare this, the death of Charles II., in the succeeding February, changed the whole cur- rent of action. The Duke ascended the throne as James II. The approving papers were never returned, and the King, after issuing new instructions to Don- gan nullifying much that had been done, soon deter- mined to merge the dirterent provinces north of the Delaware into one government. Dongan was recalled, and Sir Edmund Andros made Governor of what His Majesty was pleased to call "our Territory and Do- minion of New England in America." A council of forty-two of the princij^al inhabitants was named hy the King, to whom was assigned the making of laws and imposing of taxes. In the list of these counsel- ors we again find the names of Philipse and Van Cortlandt, who were far from being pleased with the change. In a letter of theirs to the Board of Trade they join with Lieutenant-Governor Nicholson and Mr. W. Bayard in saying " how fatall it hath been to this city and the Province of New York for to be annexed to that of Boston, which, if it had continued, would have occasioned the totall ruin of the Inhabitants of .?aid Province." ' It must easily appear that these changes, with the consi'ijuent thwarting of their j)oliti- cal hopes, produced much dissatisfaction among the people of this county. Ruled by a King who difi'ered with them in religion, with no voice in the legislation by which to protect themselves, and now even their colonial existence destroyed, they were loud in their denunciations and threats. But the effect of this act of union the people had but a short time, in mur- muring mood, to consider, as the great Revolution at the close of the year 1688 compelled James to abdi- cate his power, and placed upon the throne his daugh- ter Mary and her husband, the Prince of Orange. This event brought out the glad symi)athies of the English as well as the Dutch-descended inhabitants of the whole colony of New York. But, strange to s:iy, instead of a united congratulation, the anxiety on the part of the populace for the change, and dread lest it should miscarry, combining with the untoward situation of things, the absence of any accredited repre- sentative of the higher power and of any otficial infor- mation of the accession of William (which would have been followed by a public proclamation of it), caused in New York one of the saddest and most absurd • N. Y. Col. Mans., toI. iii. p. 576. illustrations of that state of affairs when " the people furiously rage together and imagine a vain thing." The news of the insurrection in Boston, in which Governor Andros was seized and imprisoned, reached New York on the very day that word also came that France, whither James had fled, had commenced war with Eng;land and Holland. The fears of the people were aroused. It was immediately determined by the city authorities that as the Royal garrison of the town was very weak, the militia should be summoned to share in the defense of the Fort. Colonel Bayard ac- cordingly assigned the six companies of the city, which he commanded, to mount guard in turn. So deep was the suspicion of Mr. Bayard and of the other citizens who, as members of the Council, had been associated widi Dongan and Andros in the adminstration of af- fairs, and who now, with Nicholson, having indeed no orders, were delaying the proclamation of William and Mary, that the captains of the train-bands, in- duced by Jacob Leisler, one of their number, took possession of the Fort, and declared their determina- tion to protect the province until the coming of the accredited Governor to be sent by William. Besides the six captains and four hundred men of New York, a company of seventy men from East Chester seems to have been present on this 3d of June and subscribed to the following declaration : " Hliereae, our inteiitioQ tended only but to the preservatiou of tbe [irolestant religion ami tlie fort of tliis city, to the end tliat we may avoid and prevent the rash judgment of the world in so just a design, we have thought tit to let every body know by these public proclamatione that till the safe arryval of the .ships that we expect every day from his royal highness, the prince of Orange, with orders for the government of this country in the behalf of such person as the said royal highness had chosen and honored with the charge of a Governor, that as soon as the bearer of the said orders shall have let us see his power, then and with- out any delay execute the said orders punctually, declaring that we do intend to suliniit and obey not only the said orders but also the liearer thereof committed for the execution of the same.'- In witness hereof we have signed these presents the third of June, KiS'J. It appears also that there was a company of soldieis from New Rochelle, commanded by CaptainiCottomear. When it is remembered that it was at this very time that the French settlers of New Rochelle obtained through Leisler their lands in that town from John Pell, and when also the rumors industriously cir- culated are presented, which pictured the French as having, among other designs in taking New York, one to seize their countrymen, the Huguenots, and torture them or ship them back to France,^ it will be ob- vious how easy it was for Leislei' to involve them, in his designs, as subserving thereby their own safety. The interest of Westchester in these proceedings also appears in the fact that when, after the destruction of Schnectady, Leisler sent an expedition against the French and the Indians, there is no doubt that there was, for its size, a large representation of the County in these troops.^ 2 Vide Smith's New York, 2d Ed., 1792, p. 74. s Instructions to Count de Frontenac. N. Y. Doc. Hist. vol. 1., p. 29.5. * N. Y. Doc. Hist. vol. ii. pp. 12-15. Baird's Rye, p. 48 and 198. N. Y. Col. Mans. THE COLONIAL PERIOD. 163 When Leisler took possession of the fort at New York, Lieutenant-Governor Nicholson without dehij' set sail for England, leaving the government in charge of the Council, the membeis of which were, Philii)se, Van Cortland and Bayard. Of course, the public confidence was still more diminished. Leisler, taking advantage of this state of things, invited from each of the counties a delegation of two to meet in conven- tion, and also two men from each to guard the fort. This convention, which met June 2(), KiS'.t, and in which Westchester was represented, authorized ten of their number to be a committee of safetj', who, in their turn, commissioned Leisler to exercise the powers of commander-in-chief of the Province. In this com- mittee were Richard Panton and Thomas Williams, of this County, who seem to have been most active supporters of Leisler. Some months afterwards a letter from King Wil- liam to Nicholson was intercepted by Leislei", who ap- propriating its directions to himself, set up the claim that " he had received a commission to be their Majes- ties Lieutenant-Governor," and then proceeded to ap- point his Council, among whom was Thomas \Vil- liams, of Westchester. The new Governor, Sloughter, did not appear until March 9th, but meanwhile acts of lawlessness and tyranny, rashness and demagogism abounded in the city and other parts of the colony, in which Leisler and members of his Council and their followers were the most active. In a suit tried at Westchester in 1693, Williams, then sixty-two years of age, deposed that " the first reason of this difficulty was a big look violently from me. Caj)tain Panton commanded him (Leggett, the plaintiff) to hold his peace, but he still continued abusing the defendant, and said, ' here comes the father of rogues' and many scurrilous words, upon which I got a warrant against him." Williams lived in West Farms, and Gabriel Leggett was, as ai)pears by a deed of March 3, 1(595, his near neighbor.^ Upon the arrival of Sloughter, Leisler and his as- sociates, who, with mud infatuation, held on to their usurped authority after three different demands from the Governor, were immediately upon their surrender arrested and confined on the charge of treason. Upon indictment they were soon tried, and upon conviction sentenced to death. In the order of the King to Sloughter, appointing his Council, we find again the names of Philipse and Van Cortlandt, who, with their associates, were now sworn into office- Sloughter, reports to England that many of Leisler's followers "were well enough affected to their Majesties Government, but through ignorance were l)ut upon to do what they did," and advises as an example, the execution only of the ringleaders. 1 Court of Sessions Journal. Bolton's " Hist, of Westchester County," vol ii. p. 183. The first Assembly of the province, which the new Governor summoned, met on the 9th of April, 1691, and the member from Westchester County was John Pell. The position taken by this Assembly was that the acts passed in 1683, not having received the ap- probation of Charles the Second nor the Duke of York were null and void, and it proceeded to enact some of the laws supposed by the people to be in force. An act making a division of the province into twelve counties, as intended in 1()83, was passed. In addi- tion, the following laws for Westchester County were enacted: "An act for settling a ministry and raising a maintenance for them in Westchester County. An act for settling the militia. An act offering twenty shillings for a grown wolf killed by a Christian in Westchester County, and ten shillings for such a wolf killed by an Indian; one-half that sum respectively for a whelp. An act for the further laying out and regu- lating and better clearing public highways through- out this Colony," in which Adolph Philipse, Esq., Caleb Heathcote, Esq., Mr. Joseph Drake, Mr. John Stevenson and Mr. John Haitt are made commis- sioners to take a I'eview of the roads. These and the other acts of this Assembly were sent to England for approval. After much delay and hesitation, and under cir- cumstances not too strongly to be reprehended, the execution of Leisler and his son-in-law and confeder- ate, Jacob Milborne, was ordered and took jjlace on the 16th of May, 1691. The punishment of Williams and his associates was deferred. But little more than two months passed when Sloughter himself, after an illness of only two days, died under circumstances at first deemed suspicious, but afterwards differently re- garded. His death occurred on the 26th of July, 1691, and after a disadvantageous interregnum of thirteen months, his successor. Colonel Benjamin Fletcher, landed in New York. The day after his arrival his commission and the names of members of his Council were proclaimed. Some changes of this body, which was substantially that under Sloughter, were afterwards deemed necessary, which introduced Colonel Caleb Heathcote, of the Manor of Scarsdale, and thus gave Westchester additional weight in the Province. In the succeeding March, 1693, the Assembly met the County being represented by John Pell and by Joseph Theale, of the town of Rye. From the report of Governor Fletcher to the home government, in April of this year, we extract the following from his list of those employed in civil ofiice in the province of New York: The justices in Westchester County were Col. Caleb Heathcote, Judge of Common Pleas, J(jseph Theale, Win. Barnes, Daniel Strange, James Mott, John Hunt, Wm. Chadderton, Thomas Pinkney, Esqrs.; Benjamin Collier, Esq., Sherift"; Joseph Lee, Clerk of the county.' 2N. T. Col. Mans , Limrlon Poc. IX. vol. iv, p. 27. 16-t HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Theale, Strange and Collier were of the town of Eye ; Barnes and Hunt, of Westchester ; Chadderton and Pinkney, of East Chester; Mott, of Maoiaroueck, and Lee in all likelihood, from Yorktown. In the same report the militia of the county is represented to con- sist of six companies of foot, commanded by Colonel Caleb Heathcote, and to number two hundred and eighty-three men. In the following September a new Assembly was convened by Fletcher, and Pell is again a member of the House, and has as his colleague, iu jjlace of Theale, Humphrey Underbill, also of Rye. At this session of the Colonial Legislature the act was passed, which, after ap2)roval, was carried out, in reference to the maintenance of religion in the province. The bill provided for good, sufficient Protestant ministers to officiate and have the care of souls. It required that there should be two ministers in the county of West- chester, one of whom should have care of Westchester, East Chester, Yonkers and the Manor of Pelham, and the other of Rye, Mamaroneck and Bedford, and that fifty pounds should be raised for each of the incum- bents ; and also whatever sum might be necessary for the maintenance of the poor, which amounts were to be levied by the wardens and vestrymen, for whose election the act also provided.' It appears that the Governor took the deepest interest in the spiritual welfare of the colony. He was a man of great earnest- ness and promptness, and made himself felt to the general advantage. The Indians, in their appre- ciation of him, styled him Cayenguirago, or the "great swift arrow." What he counseled and did reached directly the difficulty. The necessity for his anxiety as to religion will appear from the strictures upon our county, contained in a letter of Colonel Heathcote, written in 170-1, — " I first came among them . . . about twelve years ago. I found it t)ie most rude and lipatlienisli country I ever saw in my whole life, which called themselves Christians, there being not so much its the least marks or footsteps of religion of any sort. Sundays were only times set apart by them for all manner of vain sports and lewd diversion, and they were grown to such a degree of rudeness that it was intolerable. I liaving then command of the militia, sent an order to all the captains . . . that in case they would not in every town agree among them- selves to appoint readers and to pass the Sabbath in the best manner they could . . . that tlie captains should every Sunday call their com- panies under arms and spend the day in exercise." - It was a matter of great satisfaction to the many of all parties in the province when the news was re- ceived about this time that the King had wisely granted a full pardon to Williams and the others with Leisler, who all this while, though released on bail, yet remained under sentence of death. Their course had awakened no little enthusiasm in their determined refusal " to own their liberty a favor," or depart "from the justification of their crimes." "What they did was for King William and Queen Mary."' It was 1 Baird's Rye. 2DunIap's "History of Xew York," vol. i. p. 217. 3 New York Col. JIans., vol. iv. pp. oo, 83. determined in England very properly, for the sake of harmony, to waive the point of humility and grant a full release to all concerned. In 1695 the Assemblymen from Westchester County were Joseph Purdy, of Rye, and Humphrey Under- bill; but in April, 1697, Underbill, for non-attend- ance, was expelled, and Joseph Theale returned in his stead. In 1698 the Earl of Bellamont succeeded Fletcher in the Governorship, and in the new Assem- bly Joseph Purdy, and John Drake of East Chester, appear for Westchester County. A complaint of un- due election was made to the House by Henry Fowler, of East Chester, and Josiah Hunt, of Westchester ; but after thorough consideration Purdy and Drake were unanimously declared to have been duly elected. Mr. Drake was chosen again in 1699, with John Hunt, of Westchester, as his associate. From a table of the different regiments in the province of New York, it would seem that that of Westchester County had greatly diminished in strength by 1700. It is reported as consisting of only the three com- panies in Eastchester, New Rochelle and Mama- roneck, and of not more than one hundred and fifty- five men.^ In 1701, at the election in midsummer, while Mr. Drake was again chosen, the other seat for the county was in dispute between Joseph Purdy and Henry Fowler, of East Chester. The matter having been referred to a committee on the petition of Fow- ler, David Provoost, from this committee, reported that it had sent for several persons and papers and had found that Henry Fowler was elected a member of the House. The report was ai)proved, and the clerk of the crown was ordered before the House to amend the returns by putting out the name of Joseph Purdy and putting in that of Henry Fowler, who, by direc- tion, went then before the Governor and took the oath of office.* But a more serious matter at this same session was the expulsion of Mr. John Drake, who, with others, violently withdrew, refusing to act with the Speaker (Governeur) on the ground of his being an alien and di.squalified for public office. A new election was ordered, and William Willett, of Westchester, chosen, who, after ten days' occupation of his seat, was ex- pelled for representing the organization of the House illegal, Mr. Willett assuming the same position on the question as Mr. Drake. Another election was ordered, and Colonel Heathcote was now chosen, who, after taking the oath, would not sit. Another election was ordered for the next spring, but the Assembly was itself dissolved on the 3d of May. On the 30th of September, 1701, as signers of a pe- tition to King William from the Protestants of New York, evidently anti-Leislerians, appear the names of Caleb Heathcote, John Horton, Joseph Purdee, John Drake, William Willett and William Barnes, who * New York Col. Mss., vol. iv. pp. SOT, 810. 5 Journal of New York Assembly. THE COLONIAL PERIOD. 165 speak, they say, for themselves and two-thirds of the freeholders and inhabitants of Westchester County. In this paper they complain of unjust proscription and imputations and profess most thorough submis- sion and loyalty.' The same names are found sub- scribed to an address of welcome to Lord Cornbury, the newly-appointed Governor. This paper is dated October 2, 1702, and in it they again state that they represent two-thirds of the inhabitants and freeholders of the county of Westchester.- We safely gather from these papers, legislative proceedings and elections the high state of political feeling throughout the colony, in which the people of Westchester thoroughly shared. The course of Lord Bellamont and of his temporary .successor, Lieutenant-Governor Nan fan, had been in the interest of the friends of Leisler. Abraham Gov- erueur, who had married Leisler's widowed daughter, Mrs. Milborne, was the head of the faction, and they had succeeded in placing him in the Speaker's chair. Drake, Purdy,Willett and Heathcote were pronounced opponents of these radicals, whose representative in this county evidently was Henry Fowler, of East Ches- ter. Is it not probable that John Drake, — Lieutenant of the militia company in East Chester, which went down to aid Leisler, took the gauge of this ambitious and arrogant man from dealings with him at the Fort, and hence easily fell into line with those who made common cause with the friends of law and order, rather to resist the aspirations of the new man, when his claims for consideration above others heretofore leaders were only his own presumption and self-importance ? At the election of 1702, upon Lord Cornbury as- suming the reins of government, Joseph Purdy and William Willett were chosen to the Assembly from Westchester County. The resolution of this body is recalled to mind, which declared that any bills passed when an alien is Speaker are not binding on the sub- ject. This action, of course, vindicates the conduct of Drake and Willett, who would not countenance Governeur as Speaker. Mr. Willett, with the ex- ception of two years, held a seat in the Assembly con- secutively for the next thirty odd years. Mr. Edmund Ward, of East Chester, was his colleague from 1705 to 1712, Mr. John Hoit held the place for a year, and Mr. Josejih Budd, of Rye, from 1711? to 1722, when Mr. Adolph Philipse was elected and also became Speaker of the Assembly. In 1709, Joseph Purdy and John Drake, and in 1715, Josiah Hunt and Jonathan Odell were returned. In 172G, Frederick Philipse accepted the i)osition, which he held until his death, in 1751, and which his son, of the same name, held after him until the Revolution. From 178!) to 1748, Daniel Purdy, of Rye, and from 1743 to the Revolution, Judge John Thomas, of the same town, was the other member from the county. The courtesy of Mr. Wil- lett and the election of Lewis Morris in 1738 will he spoken of hereafter. ' During the firet fifty years of its existence West- chester County steadily increased in population and material prosperity. Large areas of land were placed under cultivation. The public advantages of churches, schools, highways, mills, tanneries, etc., were greatly multii)lied, and the harsh life of the pioneer was mod- : crating into the regulated one of the sturdy yeoman. In the numerous measures necessary for the develop- ment of its resources and the increase of its facilities, privileges and comforts, its inhabitants exhibit quick- ness to devise, and zeal and per.«everance to prosecute to the needed accomplishment. By petitions, rejiresen- tations and remonstrances to the Asseml)ly, to the Coun- cil, to the Governor, the various towns made their wants and wishes, even if not always answered, pressingly known. And so in all questions of rights, no communi- ties in the province appear more sensitive and deter- mined. " Our representatives," says Smith, "agree- able to the general sense of their constituents, are tenacious in their opinions that the inhabit- ants of this colony are entitled to all the priv- ileges of Englishmen ; that they have a right to participate in the legislative power, and that the session of Assemblies here is wisely substituted, instead of a representation in Parliament.'" And yet this same historian is inconsistent enough to charge " that the views of these representatives seldom extend further than to the regulation of highways, the destraction of wolves, wild-cats and foxes, and the advancement of the other little interests of the par- ticular counties which they were chosen to represent."* How much more correct the first statement is, if not seen from what has already been oft'ered, will be abun- dantly manifest, as we now turn to record the ex- citements and troubles which commenced with the second third of the eighteenth century. Upon the death of Governor ^Montgomery, Mr. Rip Van Dam, the i)resident of the Council, assumed the duties of the position until a successor should be ap- pointed, which was immediately done upon the re- ceipt of the news in England. Colonel William Cosby, formerly Governor of ilinorca, was commis- sioned for New York, but remained in England nearly a year before embarking for his position, under the declared motive of preventing the [)assage of a bill, called the Sugar Bill, which was disastrous to the in- terests of the New York colony. Very early after his arrival a pecuniary disagreement sprang up between the Governor and Van Dam, growing out of this delay, which it was found necessary to otfer to the courts for settlement. The case was brought before Chief Justice Lewis Morris and his associates, De Lancey and Philipse. The decisions of the Chief Justice in the prelimin- iNew Tort Col. Mans., vol. iv. p. 938. - New York Ool. Slans., vol. iv. p. lOiiT. s Smith's "History of New York," part vi. chap. v. Carey Ed. p. 2r>(). it fifty of them kept watch upon and about the green at East Chester (the place of election), from 12 o'clock the night before till the morning of that day, the other electors be- ginning to move on Sunday afternoon and evening, so as to be at New Ro- chelle by midnight — their way lay through Ilarnson's Purchase, the in- habitants of which i^roviiled for their euterUiinnient as they passed each house in their way, having a table plentifully covered for that purpose. About midnight they all met at the house of Wni. Le Count, at New Ro- chclle, whose hoiise not being large enough to entertain so great a num- ber, a large fire was made in the street, by which they stit till daylight, at which time they began to move. They were joined on the hill at the east end of the town bj about seventy hoi-se of the electors of the lower part of the county, and then proceeded towards the place of election in the following order, viz. : Fii'st rode two trumpeters and three violins ; next, fo\ir of the principal freeholders, one of which carried a banner, on one side of which was atlixed, in gold capitals, ' King George,' and on the other, in golden capitals, 'Liberty and Law ;' ne.xt followed the candidate, Lewis Morris, Esq., late chief justice of this province; then two colors ; and at sunrising they entered upon the green of East Ches- ter, the place of election, followed by above three hundred horse of the principal freeholders of the county, (a greater number than had ever ap- peared for one man since the settlement of that county.) -\fter having rode three times x-ound the green, they went to the houses of Joseph Fowler and Child, who were well prepared for their reception, the late chief justice was met, on his alighting, by several gentlemen who came there to give their votes for him. About 11 o'clock ap- peared the candidate of the other side William Forster, Esq., school- master, appointed by the Society for Propagation of the Gospel, and lately made, by commission from his Excellency (the present Governor), Clerk of the Peace and Conmion Pleas in that county, which commission, it is said, he purchased for the valuable consideration of one hundred pistoles, given the Governor ; next him came two ensigns, borne by two of the freeholders ; then followed the Honorable James De Lancey, Esq., chief justice of the province of New York, and the Honorable Frederick The conduct of the sheriff with reference to the Quaker vote was for some time afterward the subject of ardent denunciation on the one side and of deter- mined defense on the other. It was also made a matter of complaint against Cosby, who had ap- pointed Cooper. The Governor, replying to the home government, justified the action of the sheriff as Philipse, Esq., second judge of the said province and baron of the ex- chequer, attended by abo\it a hundred and seventy horse of the free- holders and friends of the said Forster and the two judges. They en- tered the green on the east side, and, riding twice round it, their word was 'No Land Tax !' As they pivssed, the second judge very civilly sa- luted the late chief justice by taking oft' his hat, which the late judge returned in the same manner, some of the late judge's party crying out ' No Excise ! ' and one of them was heard to say(tliough not by the judge) ' No Pretender ! ' upon which Forster, the candidate, replied, ' I will take notice of you,' They after that retired to the house of Baker, which was prepared to receive and entertain them. About an hour after, the high sheriff came to town, finely mounted, the housings and holster-caps lieing scarlet, richly laced with silver, belonging to . Upon his approach, the electors on both sides went into the green, where they were to elect, and, after having read his majesty's writ, bid the electors proceed to the choice, which they did, and a gi'eat majority appeared for 3Ir. Morris, the late judge ; upon which a poll was demanded, but by whom is not known to the relator, though it was said by many to be done by the sheriff himself. "Slorris, the candidate, several times asked the sherilTupon whoseside the majority appeared, but could get no other reply but that a poll must be had ; and, accordingly, after about two hours' delay in getting benches chairs and tables, they began to i)oll. Soon after, one of those called Quakers, a man of known worth and estate, came to give his vote for the late judge. Upon this Forster and the two Fowlers Moses and William, chosen by him to be inspectors, questioned his having an es- tate and required of the sheriff to tender him the book to swear in due form of law, which he refused to do, but offered to take his solemn affir- mation, which, both by the laws of England and the laws of this prov- ince, was indulged to the people called Quakers, and had always been practiced from the first election of representatives in this province to this time, and never refused ; but the sheriff was deaf to all that could be alleged on that side ; and, notwithstanding that he was told by the late chief justice and James Alexander, Esq., one of his Majesty's coun- sel and counseller-at-law, and by William Smith, Esq., counseller-at- law, that such a procedure was contrary to law and a violent attempt of the liberties of the peojile, he still pei-sisted in refusing the said Quaker to vote, and in like manner did refuse seven-and-tliirty Quakers more, — men of known and visible estates. This Cooper, now high sheriff of the said county, is said not only to be a stranger in that county, but not having a foot of land or visible estate in it, unless very lately granted, ami it is believed he has not where withall to purchase any. The polling had not been long continued before Mr. Edward Stephens, a man of very considerable estate in said county, did openly, in the hearing of all the freeholders there assembled, charge William Forster, Esi\., the candi- date on the other side, with being a Jacoliite and in the interest of the Pretender, and that he should suy to Mr. William Willet (a person of good estate and known integrity, who was at that time present and ready to make oath to the truth of what was said), that true it was, he had taken oaths to his JIajesty King George and enjoyed a place in the Government under him which gave him bread ; yet, notwithstanding, that should James coine into England he should think himself obliged to go there and fight for him. This was loudly and strongly urged to Forster's face, who denied it to be true and no more was said of it at that time. About eleven o'clock that night the poll was closed, and it stood thus, — For the late chief justice 231 Quakers 38 269 For William Forster, Esq 151 For difference 118 2G9 So thatthe late chief justice carried itby a great majority without the Quakers. Upon closing the polls the other candidate (Foi-ster) and the sheriff wished the late chief justice much joy. Forster said he hoped THE COLONI. strictly conforming to the letter of the law, and defended him and the defeated candidate, Mr. Fors- ter, from all aspersions. In this vindication of these gentlemen, the Council, with much spirit, joined. In course of time provision was made by special enact- ment,' by which, where the usual form of oath could not conscientiously be taken, affirmation should be allowed. Thus future misunderstanding was pre- vented. The excitement that characterized this spe- cial election did not, it would seem, attend that of the next year, when Frederick Philipse and Judge Morris were re-elected. In 173S, the Judge resigning, yU: Willett was again restored. Perhaps no subjects more engaged the thoughts of the New York colonist in the decade before 1763 than the encroachments of the French upon the frontiers of several of the English colonies, his own included, and then the seven years' war which was the conse- quence. Every county and town cheerfully made up its contingent. The names on the muster-rolls, which have been so wonderfully preserved, indicate how largely Westchester County contributed to swell the armies sent forth in the .several campaigns. As the fortunes of the several battles, sieges and marches varied, the firesides of these country homes were illumined or darkened. When, for example, the capitulation of Fort William Henry, in August, 1757, was reported (seven officers and fift}' men of the gar- rison, all New Yorkers, thereby becoming prisoners of war), a deep thrill of indignation stirred every breast/ but the feeling was more intense when the word came that "the French General Montcalm, under his own eyes and in the face of about three thousand of his regular troops, suffered his Indian allies to rob and strip officers as well as men of all they had, and left most of them naked." On the other hand, when the French surrendered Niagara in 1759, Montreal in 1760 and Canada in tlio late juilge would not think the worse of Uini for setting up against hini, to which the judge replied he believed he was put upon it against his inclinations, but that he was highly blaniable, and wlio did or Bhoiild know better, for putting the sheriff, who was a stranger and ig- norant in such niattei-s, upon making so violent an attempt upon the liberty of the people, which woulil expose him to ruin if he irrre worth £10,000, if the people aggrieved shouhl conunence suit against hiui. The people made a loud huzza, which the late chief judge blamed very much, as what he thought not right. Forster reiilieil, he took no notice of what the common people did, since Sir. Morris did not jiut them upon the doing of it. Tlie indentures being sealed, the whole body of electors waited on their new representative to his lodgings, with trumpets sounding and violins playing, anil in a little time took their leave of him. Thus ended the West Cliester election to the general satisfaction." " Kew York, Xovkmheb am.— On Wednesday, :!lst October, the late chief justice, but now representative for the county of Westchester, landed in this city about live o'clock in the evening, at the ferry -stairs. On his landing he was saluted by a general fire of the guns from the merchant-ves.sels lying in the road, and was received by great numbers of the most considerable merchants and inhabitants of this city, and by them with loud acclamations of the people as he walked the streets con- ducted to the Black Ilorae tavern, where a handsome entertainment was prejiared for him at the charge of the gentlemen who received him, and in the middle of one side of the room was tixed a tablet with golden capitals, 'King George, Liberty and Law! " 1 New York Col. MSS., vol. v, p. 9!s3. 2 X. Y. Col. MSS., vol. Tii, p. 274. ;AL period. 167 1763, that the joy was almost immoderate may well be imagined. The various muster-rolls of companies raised in Westchester County for this war, to which allusion has been made, offer a suggestion or two worthy of notice. The existence of a well-organ- ized militia force at this period is established by the designation of the captains of the companies to which the recruits belonged. Captains Theale, Griffin, Lockwood, Crain, Holmes, Dennis, Embury, Israel Underbill, Secord, Vermilye and at least twenty others are mentioned. Christian Marks, a German, twenty-seven years of age, five feet seven inches in stature, with dark eyes and hair, is described to be " of the Troop." Can it be that Benedict Arnold, born in Connecticut, eighteen years of age, a weaver, five feet seven inches, with light eyes and black hair, is he of infamy unecjualed, and has this county then the stigma of having introduced him into a military career whose later chapters he made so foul and dark ? Another remark comes from the number of for- eigners enlisted. So large is the proportion of such that it would appear that the County during this period was receiving large accessions to its popula- tion from other nations and other colonies. Ireland, " Old Englanil " and Connecticut are frequently indi- cated as the place of nativity. We find also that more thanhalf of these soldiers were under twenty-five years of age. A result of these military experiences was to prepare these men, by the knowledge gained, for that other and much more serious contest, which, though less thought of in that time of danger than before it, was imminent and inevitable. The twelve years before the Revolution which suc- ceeded the Peace of Paris were, however, to develop to the proportions necessary for action the antago- nism of which the wilful assumptions of the mother- country was the occasion. Had untrammeled legis- lation for the intei'est of the colonies been allowed, it is possible that the military successes just obtained might have been turned into a matter of national pride among the people on this side of the Atlantic, as well as the other. But with an indifference to their welfare ever apparent, an interference was car- ried on even farther than a concern for her own man- ufacturing and other industries required. And the consequence, as was to be expected, was deei) and universal discontent. And when this is said, it is but just to remember that in those years the most thoroughly loyal were exasperated with the course pursued by the home government, and deemed it neither wise nor fair. Some of these were pro- nounced enough; others there were who took per- haps too much account of the excitable elements which the war especially had thrown into society,' ' The truth is that the cess;>tion of hostilities had set adrift a large number of reckless men, to whom wore added, as influenced by their example and fortunes, many of the young men of each community. In his letter to the Lords of Trade, November 5, 17fi5, speaking of a mob in New York City, which it was thought might storm the fort, Lieutenant-Governor Colden says, "Probably it might be attended with 168 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. and were balancing the after all inconsiderable, how- ever unquestionable, ills they were suffering against those of outrage and violence which might follow. Indeed, as in the city, so in the county of West- chester itself, there had been already displays of law- lessness. What must have been tlie consternation in the lower towns as, in May, 1765, five hundred men — country levelers they are called — at first reported to be two thousand strong, marched down to Kings- bridge, and sent into town the threat to Mr. Van Cort- ' land, that unless he would give them a grant forever of h\< lands, they would enter the city and pull down his house, and also one belonging to Mr. Lambert Moore.' The arrest and condemnation of the ringleaders in these disturbances were satisfying and quieting, but it is not reasonable to suppose that they would allay the apprehension that like outrages would follow should there be a breach with the mother-country. A glance at the action of the four Westchester rep- resentatives at this time of excitement would seem to show at first entire accord with their fellow-members in the Assembly, in their regret at the Stamp and Tariff' Acts, in their assertion of the right of the Colonial Assembly of each province exclusively to impose taxes upon its inhabitants, in the lawfulness of inter- communication between the Legislatures of the several colonies and of united petitions to the King " in favor of the violated rights of America." '^ liut the journal of the House in March, 1775, evi- dences the differences that had developed. In the i)rei)aration of an address to the King, Mr. Clinton (afterward Governor George Clinton), the As- sembly having before it for approval the words, " AV^e, in many instances, disapprove of the conduct of that province (Massachusetts)," moved to substitute in place of them the following strong assertion: "The ill-policied schenie of colonial administration pursued by your Majesty's ministers since the close of the late war has been productive of great warmth in every part of your empire, nor can we avoid declaring that we view those acts with that jealousy which is the necessary result of a just sense of the blessings of free- dom, and abhor the })rinciples they contain as estab- lishing precedents subversive of the rights, privileges and proi)erty, and dangerous to the lives of your Majesty's American subjects." Mr. Van Cortlandt and Mr. Thomas voted aye on this amendment, and Mr. Philipse and i\Ir. Wilkins voted nay.'' And yet although this was the last Colonial Assembly of New York, this session lasting but a few days after the adoption of this address to the King, yet how little its mucli bloodsUeil, because a great part of the mob consists ot men who liave been privateers and disbandeil soldiei-s, whose view is to plunder the town." 1 .Juurual of Captain John Jlontressor, N.Y. Hist. Soc. Col., 1881, p. 3G3. ' " this House doth Concur witli and adopt tlie resolutions of the House of Burgesses of the Dominion of Virginia.'" — K. Y. Assembly Journal, May 16, 17G9. 3 Of course in not suggesting before this, the able political pamphlets under the name of A. Tl'. Furmet; written by Mr. Wilkins, the member of the General Assembly from the Borough of M'sstchester, we have no members realized the dangers which were so near at hand! This is shown in the following action, within a month previous, bearing upon the interests of the east side of the county. A petition from Joseph Rod- man and one hundred and twenty-six others, ft'ee- holders and inhabitants of the Manor of Pelham, East and Westchester and New Roclielle, in the County of Westchester, having been presented to the House and read, praying that Joshua Pell, Jr., may have leave to bring in a bill to enable him to erect a bridge across the old creek, so-called, that runs between the said Manor of Pelham and Eastchester, ordered That the members of Kings and Queens Counties, together with the members for the borough of Westchester, or the major part of them, be a committee to view the premises and report their opinion to this House ivifh- in fourteen days after the beginning of the next session thereof, and that the clerk of this House serve Philip Pell, Esq., and Stephen Ward with a copy of the said petition and of this order.* Chief Families.— In any review of the history of this period, memory will easily recall the names of Pell, Philipse, Morris, De Lancey, Van Cortlandt as of families po.ssessiug large influence in the county ot Westchester. To these may be added the Bartows, Wards, Drakes, Fowlers, Hunts, Purdys, Guions, Pinkneys and Thomases as families which, for intel- ligence, wealth, public spirit and valuable services in the foremost positions, have been held in the highest estimation. In them are found the leaders of thought and action in religion, in the State and in society. The judicial, executive and legislative functions ot government were being exercised by members of these families during the colonial period. How largely the production of its ])rosperity is to be attributed to the thoughtfulness and energy of the original Patentees of Westchester County may readily be conceived when the faithfulness whicii they displayed and the high respect continually accorded to them is considered. If to their successful exertions for the common ma- terial advantage be added the example afforded in the whole range of moral excellences, no portion of the province of New York was more favored. The first member of the Pell family in the county was Thomas, to whom several patents from the Eng- lish crown and sales by the Indians were made. Dying without issue, in his will he made his nephew, John Pell, his heir, who then resided in England, but re- moved to this country in 1670. He became a Judge of the county and was returned for the first session of the Colonial Assembly of the province of New York. He married" Rachel Pinckney" and died about the year 1700, leaving a number of children and grandchil- intention to ignore his determined opjioBition to all efforts beyond those of remonstrance ; and yet we read those papers amiss, and his speeches, and his vote, with all his earnestness of diction, if we are not juslified in saying that, beneath, is all the wounded spirit of one who feels the wrongs of his brethren, whom a selfish and impnideut jmrent has pro- voked to wrath. < Journal of Gen. Assembly of New York-, February 24, 1775. THE COLONIAL PERIOD. 169 dien. The family intermarried in the eighteenth cen- tury with the Eustises, Honeywells, Bartows, Sands, Wards, Treadwells, Archers, Snedeus, Lawrences, Pinkncys and other families of the County. At the (.ommencement of the Revolutionary period the fol- lowing members of the Pell family were living in Pel- ham and towns adjacent: Thomas Pell, who married Margaret Bartow, and who lived at the homestead in Pelham, now known as the residence of Robert Bartow ; John Pell, who lived on what is now the Schuyler Place ; Joshua, Jr., who married Abigail Archer, and who lived on what is now the property of Mr. George A. Prevost ; James, who married Martha Pugsley, and who lived on Prospect Hill, in the house which Gene- ral Howe took possession of, October 18, 1776, as his headquarters; Philip, in the war Judge-Advocate of the American army, who lived on the old Boston Post Road, above Pell's Bridge; David I. his brother, who lived near the same bridge, but on the road sometimes called Pelham Lane, where Mr. James Hay afterward built the fine stone house now standing; Caleb, a bro- ther of James, who lived in Eastchester town, on the old Boston Post Road, where is now the Bathgate estate, and Joseph, who resided in Upper Eastchester, on the westerly side of the White Plains Road, nearly opposite the road running down to Burtis's Mill on the Hutchinson's River. The first of the Philipse family in Westchester County emigrated from Holland to New York City in lt)58, bringing with him his son of the same Christian name, Frederick, to whom at his decease descended his estate, the largest part of which was in this county. This second Frederick was for many years one of the council of the Governor. He was a merchant in the city much respected. His grandson, Frederick, rep- resented Westchester for a quarter of a century in the Assembly, as did also a Fifth Frederick, wliose es- tates were confiscated after the Revolution. This family was connected by marriage with the Van Cort- laudt and Morris families. The estates of Philipse were in the towns of Yonkers and what is now known as Mount Pleasant. The connections of the Van Cortlaiidt family, both in this country and England, during the colonial pe- riod, were very numerous and distinguished. It is a family which an honored State and country gladly recalls to memory.' The first of the De Lancey family, Stephen, appears as early as 168(5, having been compelled to flee from the religious persecutions which were then so bitterly going on in France. He settled in New York as a mer- chant, and married Anne, daughter of Stephen Van Cortlandt. Their oldest son, James, the Chief Justice and Lieutenant-Governor of New York, mar- ried Anne, daughter of Colonel Caleb Heathcote. James's brother, Peter, married Alice, daughter of 1 A trustworth.v and bighly interesting history of the Van Cortlandt family, specially prcjiared from original family ilociiments by Mre. C. E. Van Coi tlaudt for this work, is given elsewhere Governor Caldwallader Colden, and Oliver, another brother, held many positions of trust, among which were Receiver-General and member of the Governor's Council. He was also an officer in the French War, rising afterwards, in the Revolution, to the rank in the British service of Brigadier-General- This family, so marked for its political influence, became connected by marriage with the Aliens of Pennsyl- vania, the Lloyds and Joneses of Long Island, the Waltons, Barclays and Crugers of New York. In the contest with the mother-country, the De Lanceys unflinchingly adhered to the royal cau.se. Bishop De Lancey, of Western New York, who was a grandson of Governor De Lancey, sustained in his professional career the old reputation of the family for soundness of judgment, fidelity to convictions and trusts, cordiality and })hilanthropy. The Morris family, of the county, has held its own under the earlier and later r^ghne and otters a race of stalwart citizens of Westchester County as marked mentally as physically. In 1670, Richard Morris, afterward a merchant of New York, purchased a large tract of land in the lower portion of the east side of the county, since called jMorrisania. His property went to his brother Lewis by reason of an agreement made between them, but at the decease of Lewis passed to his nephew of the same name, who afterwards became Chief Justice of New York, as also, in 1733, under circumstances of excitement and self- defence already narrated, the Representative of West- chester County. The different limbs and branches of this ancestral tree are very numerous. The con- nections of this family are with the Grahams, the Van Cortlandts, Wilkinses, Ludlows, Randolphs, Ogdens, Lawrences, Rutherfords, Governcurs and foreign families whom it is not necessary to detail. The old mansion is at Morrisania, near Harlem. The Bartow family, of Huguenot descent, has oc- cupied a much respected position of influence and usefulness in the country during both the eighteenth and ninteenth centuries. The head of the family in this country was the Rev. John Bartow, who, in 1702, settled in the town of Westchester, and there reared a large family. His descendants have been among the most valued citizens of Westchester County, and indeed of the country North and South. Trade. — In the develoi)ment of Westchester Coun- ty, its proximity to New York City was from the first an important element to its advantage. Here was a ready market for the products of the soil. The early settler entered upon his work of raising the supply for his family and neighbors with the knowledge of a sure and easy disi)osal of the sur])lus of his crop. There is no doubt that in a coasting trade much was sent both north and south, to Rhode Island and Boston and the Carolinas, direct from the villages of the County, but the vast bulk of what it had to sell went through New York City, the port of entry, to the mother country and various other lands at greater 17U HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. or less distances. At first, wheat, barley, rye, peas and Indian corn were exported, but afterward live stock, hemp, flax, apples, onions, tobacco, cheese,^ pickled oysters prepared, and then other articles, as tar, bacon, butter, candles, linseed oil, inferier cloths and, for a short time, hats. During the war between France and England, in the reign of Queen Anne, when there was a great scarcity of provisions in Europe, the farmer of the New York colony received a high price for his wheat, and was much encouraged. This effect was far from satisfactory to his kinsman beyond the seas. In that selfishness which borders on nervous jealousy, and which would suppress all industries that conflict with its own, the colonial planter and merchant found his enemy in his own household. This petty interference was carried still farther, in the discouragement of even what was not known in the commercial dealings of the mother country. The trade with foreign ports and the production of what might be carried directly to the stranger and even to the fellow colonist was ordered to be discontiiiued. The blindness and injustice of such a policy is ob- vious. Gov. Clinton, seeing the stupidity of this pro- ceeding, in a letter to the home government, asks, " May not a Colony ... of Freemen who con- sume a vast quantity of the Manufectures of Great Britain, tho' this Colony raise no staple which can be imported directly into Great Britain, be more useful to her than a Colony which raises a considerable staple imported into Great Britain, and this Staple is entirely raised by the hands of Slaves, who consume very little or none of the Manufactures of Great Britain." ?- This narrow course with a people described by Dr. Bray as " so well versed in business as even the meanest planter seems to be,'" produced much irrita- tion and remonstrance. But the colonist's labors went on, and under the services of his factor a large en- richment took place. This is indicated in the addi- tions by purchase to the estates of the settlers of the unappropriated lands of the several towns, the fre- quent changings of the boundaries and the multiplica- tion of mills, smaller roads and modes of conveyance. Mails. — There seems not to be any indication of a postal communication between New York and any point in this county earlier than 1672. Of course, letters were passing by private conveyance from the very first of the settlements. Expressions showing this occur again and again in the public docu- ments. But in the year mentioned Governor Love- lace authorized a messenger or post to set forth from the city of New York monthly, " and thence to travail to Boston, from whence within that month he shall return again to this city." * This arrangement began 1 In the Post Bo!/ of Fell., ITGG, the society awarded the premium to Caleb Peil, of Pelham llaiiar, for largest and best cheese, weighing 82% lbs., and we are informed afterward that the great cheese which gained the premium was sold at vendue for eight pence per pound. -N. y. Col. Mane., vii. 7, p. 012 (1764). sProt. Epis. Hist. Col., lSo7, p. 103. < Baird's Rye, p. 72. on the 1st of Januarj', and letters or small portable goods were to be carefully carried to " Hartford, Boston, or any other points on the road," " by a sworn messenger and post purposely imployed in that Affayre," " All per- sons paying the Post before the Bag be sealed up." The postman was also directed to allow passengers to accompany him. In the " Instructions for the Post- man " are the following : " You are to comport your- self with all sobriety and civility to those that shall intrust, and not exact on them for the prices, both of Letters and Pacquets ; " "you are likewise to advise where the most commodious place will be to leave the Letters out of your road, which, when having it once well fixt, you are not only to leave the Letters there, but at your return to call for answers and leave a pub- lication of your Resolution, the w*^" you must cause to be disperst to all parts, that so all may know when and where to leave their lettei-s." ..." You shall doe well to provide yor sclfe of a spare Horse, good Port Mantle, that soe neither letters nor Pacquets re- ceive any damage under your hands. " Ffrax Lovelace. " Ffort James, ye22d of Jan'y 1672."* The ibllowing is a portion of the oath taken : " You do sweare by the Everlasting God, that you will truly and faithfully discharge the trust reposed in you as a Postmaster. . . . Neither directly nor indirectly detayne, conceale or open any Letters, Packetts, or other goods committed to your charge, but deliver, etc." This arrangement la.«ted but a short time. But this project for a mail between New York and the more northern British colonies — a favorite scheme with Lovelace, — it fell to the fortune of Gov- ernor Dongan, in 1685, to permanently establish. He had previously, however, conferred with the authori- ties " at home " and received their concurrence. The Duke of York's secretary. Sir John Werden, on the 27th of August, 1684, writes " As for setting up Post Houses along the coast from Carolina to Nova Scotia, it seems a very reasonable thing, and you may offer the privilege thereof to any undertakers for ye space of 3 or 5 yeares, by way of farme, reserving w' part of ye profitt you thinke fitt to the Duke (not less y° one- tenth)." * The next February he fully determined upon the step, after consultation with Governor Treat, of Connecticut, and on the 2d of March ordered that, for the better correspondence between the colonies of America, a post-ofl5ce be established and that the rate for riding post be per mile three pence; for every single letter not above one hundred miles, three pence ; if more, proportionably. It must be stated however, on the authority of Governor Dongan himself, that at the very time this Government arrangement com- menced, this transferring of letters was " practiced in some places by foot and horse messengers." 5 "Valentine's Manual ; " Gen. Entries, iii. 252, Sec. office, Albany. X. y. Col. MSS., vol. iii. p. 349. THE COLONIAL PERIOD. 171 The following are noticeable indications of the ex- istence of this mail : On the ItUh of January, 16S9. the mail having just left the house of Colonel Lewis Morris, in this county, was seized by Leisler's order and returned to New- York and examined.' The Earl of Bellaraont, writing May 25, 1(598, from New York, says : " the sure way of conveying letters to me is by the way of Boston, whence the post comes every week to this place." Lord Cornbury, in a letter to the Lords of Trade June 30th, 1704, writes : " The post that goes through this place, goes Eastward as far as Boston, but West- ward he goes no farther than Phila- delphia and there is no other post upon all this con- tinent." ^ In a letter des- cribing the effects of Her Majesty's proclamation as to the rates of coin, Governor Corn- bury writes as fol- lows : " It was on Monday the 5th day of February, 1705, the day the Boston Post sets out from hence, several persons here sent away as much money by the Post as he could carry." In 1704 we have from jMadam Knight's journal an account of her trip from Bos- ton to New York herself, and the postman on horseback.* In 1703 Lord Cornbury, sending home for approval several bills passed by the Assembly, speaks of one as " An Act of absolute ne- cessity, for without it the Post to Boston and Phila- delphia will be lost."* 1 X. Y. Col. MSS., vol. iii. p. r,S2. 3 N. Y. Col. JISS., vol. iv. p. 111.3. 2 N. Y. Col. MSS., vol. iv. p. 317. « X. Y. Col. MSS., vol. iv. p. 1131. 6 X. Y. Col. MSS., vol. iv. p. 11C8. In 1708, Lord Cornbury states that " From Bostou there is a Post by which we can hear once a week in .summer, and once a fortnight in winter."" In the New York Gdzette of December 9, 1734, is the following advertisement : " On Tuesday the Tenth instant, at Nine O'clock iu the Fore-noon, the Boston and Philadelphia Posts set out from Xew York to perform tlieir stages once a fort nited\iring the 3 Win- ter niuntiis and are to set out at 9 o'clock on Tues- day Mornings. Oentle- mon and Merchant'* are desired to liring their Letters in time. X. B. — This Oa/ette will also come forth on Tuesday inorningR during that time." ' With little-vari- ation this through mail arrange- ment, from which doubtless the in- habitants of West- chester County derived the same advantages a.s others on the route, continued on for twenty years longer,, when, Benjamin Franklin having^ been made Post-, master-General for the colonies, entered upon of- fice with determi- nation to increase the ])ostal facili- ties.* The weekly mail was soon started, through the winter months as well as summer, and letters leaving Philadelphia on Mon- day morning reached Boston by Saturday night. We have the names of two of the old mail- carriers, whose faces must have been very familiar and welcome at the various points along the post-road. They were both of Stratford, Conn., and must have started on their stirring careers about the same •■■ X. Y. Col. MSS., vol. V. p. 55. ' Valentine's Manual, ISM, p. 710. Franklin himself set out on a tour of inspection, and, travelinB patiently over the routes, erectc. 3 This occurred in the house of Pr. Standard, opposite the church. brown horse, about fifteen hands high, has a small star on his Fore- head and goes narrow with his Hams behind, he is branded in several Places, but not vei^ plain, on his Foreshoulder with I H, and on his Left Thigh with I R. Whosoever takes up the said Horse and brings him to his said owner shall have Five Pounds reward and all reasonable charges paid by "John Rider." * "To Be Sold, " A very good Farm and Tract of Laud thereunto belonging, contain- ing seventy-three acres or thereabouts, lying in New Kochelle, in the County of West Chester, on which is a good brick dwelling House, a well-bearing orchard aud good Timber Land ; as also three acres of Salt Meadow, in the Township of East Chester, late belonging to Lewis Guion, of East Chester, deceased. Those that are intended to purchase the same may apply to Charles Johnston, of New York, schoolmaster, or Charles Vincent, of East Chester, Rlacksmith, aud the title thereto suf- ficientlj' warranted." 6 Modes of Travel. — There were no doubt from the very first intimate relations throughout the length and breadth of the County with New York City and the adjoining State of Connecticut. Business called to the one and ties of blood and friendship to the other. Of course, ip a region devoted to agriculture the facilities of travel were in each family, and neigh- borly exchanges of opportunities were equal to the demand. So also the rivers on both sides of the county ofltred large advantages from the very first for trade and other interests. But the first known public conveyance, outside of j^ostal arrangements, through this county was established in 1772, as appears by the following advertisement in the New York Journal of July 9th : "The Stage Coach between New York and Boston "Which for the first Time sets out this day from Mr. Fowler's Tavern (fonnerly kept by Mr. Stout) at Fresh Water in New York will continue to go the Coui-se between Boston and New York, So as to be at each of those places once a fortnight, coming in on Saturday Evening and set- ing out to return by the way of Hartford on Monday Morning. The price to Passengers will be 4 d New York or 3 d lawful Money per Mile and Baggage at a reasonable lute. " Gentlemen and Ladies who choose to encourage this useful, new and expensive LTndertaking, may depend upon good Usage, and that the Coach will always put up at Houses on the Road where the best Enter- tainment is provided. . . . If ou Trial the Subscribers find Encour- agement they will perform the Stage once a Week, only altering the Day of setting out from New York and Boston to Thursday instead of Jlonday Morning. " Jonathan and Nicholas Bbown." As stages had been running for some years before this from New York to Philadelphia it appears hardly possible that communication eastward from New should be established so much later. However, very soon two and three trijjs were made every week be- tween the two cities.' And next a stage for Westchester County, going as far as Rye, was started, with, how- ever, the very strange selection of six o'clock in the evening for the return trip on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. « Weekly Pott Boy, March 23, 1747. 5 Weekly Post Boy, January 19, 1747. <• Frank's New York Directoiy, 1787. THE COLONIAL PERIOD. 173 It would seem that in 178o the first stages between New York and Albany through this county began their trips. The stages were drawn by four horses, and the charge was four pence a mile.' Philadelphia STAGE-WAGGON, and New-York STAGE BOAT performs their Stages twice a Week. JOHN BUTLER, with his wag- 4J gon, fcts out on Mondays from his Houfe, at the Sign of the Death of the Fox, in Strawberry ally, and drives the fame day to Trenton Fcrrj-, when Francis Holman meets him and proceeds on TuefJay to Brunfwick, and the paf- fengers and goods being /hilted into the waggon of Ifaac Ficzrandolph he takes them to the New Blazing Star to ]acob Fitz'randolph's the fame day, uhere Rubin Fitzran- ciolph, with a boat well futed, will receive them, and take- them to New-Yorlc that night. John Butler return- ing to Philadelphia on TuefJay with the paffengers and goods delivered to him by Francis Holman, will again fet out for. Trenton Ferry on Thurfday, and Francis Holman. &C. will carry his paiTcngers and goods, with the fame ex- pedition as above to New-York. Tcctf. Beside the sloop advantages for reaching the city and points along the shores of the county, to which allusion has been made, there were also very early ferries between it and the opposite sides of the Hud- son and the Sound. In 1739 a ferry was established between Rye and Oyster Bay,' and as early certainly as 1743 one by periauger was running between Ferry Point, in the town of Westchester, and Powell's Point, near White- stone, Long Island. Dobbs Ferry, in the town of Greenburg, was so called from a Swedish family of this name — early set- tlers, who kept a ferry from this place to the opposite shore of Rockland County. Again, in 1755, a public ferry between Ann Hook's Xeck, or Rodman's Neck, and Cedar-Tree Brook, in Hampstead Harbor, was in operation, Samuel Rodman and John Wooley being the patentees.' On a map of the road from Federal Hall to New Rochelle, passing over the Harlem River at Kingsbridge, and over the Bronx at Wil- liams' Bridge and through East Chester, there is laid down a side-road in that village, which is described as " road leading to Whitestone Fen:y," which shows undoubtedly that water communication had been es- tablished through Hutchinson's River, East Chester Bay and the Sound with the shore at Long Island. Rise of CnrRCHES. — The colonists of Westchester County, Dutch or English or French, gave their atten- tion from the first to their religious interests, and held their assemblies for religious worship as soon as they took up their new abodes. We must imagine that for the most part these early services were held in their private residences, in turn perhap.s, or at some house permanently by common consent. Their thoughts early turned to the subject of church-build- ing, which was accomplished in some localities sooner than others. In New Rochelle, in three years after its settlement by the Huguenots, a place of wor- ship was erected. It took the people of East Chester thirty years before they were determined to build, although they had asked permission twenty years before, and after this resolve near seven years elapsed before the Meeting-house was ready for use. Bedford, which was settled about 1680, and which that very year expressed its determination to build, had a place of worship within a few years. The following is supposed to be the order in which the early church edifices of the county were erected. The date of the first Quaker Meeting-house at West Chester is certainly much earlier than 1729, for Dr. Standard in that year speaks of it as then in use.* Mr. Bolton seems to mark it out as 1747, but perhaps he refers to a second edifice.^ > Stone's "Hist, of New York," p. 188. 2 Baii-d'8 " Bye," p. 78. 3 Bolton's " History of Westchester County,' vol. i. p. .546. 1680-1704. 16!)-2-'J3. icy9. 17110. 170(1. 1706-8. 1708. 1710. 172 J. 1727 « 1729.* 17:12-40. 1737. 1730-10. 1739. 1747. 175-2. 1752.* 1761. 1763. 1764. 1764. 1766. 1770. . , Westcliester Imlepeiidents. . i Westcliester Friends. I Bedford I'resliyterians. iXew liochelle Hugueuots. .Mount I'leasant Keformed Dutch. East Chester Independents. Westcliester Independents. Fordham Reformed Dutcli. Rye Church of England. Xew Rochelle Church of England. Xew Rochelle ReforniedProtestant. White Plains I*resbyterian8. Rye Presbyterians. Cortlandt Reformed Dutch. Yorlitown ' Presby terians. Harrison Friends. Marmauwick Friends. Westchester Friends. Yonkei-s Church of England. South Salem Presbyterians. Xew Castle Church of England. Xorth Salem Church of England. I East Chester Church of England. iXorlh Salem Presbyterians. Peekskill IChurch of England. J Poundridge 'Presbyterians. * About this date. The church at Mount Pleasant is the famous build- ing at Sleepy Hollow, and is still standing in ex- cellent preservation. Catherine Philipse, daughter of OloflT Stevens Van Kortlandt, and wife of Freder- ick Philipse, seems to have taken great interest in its erection and to have been largely its benefactor. IXFLCEXCEOF THE Cler(;y. — Certain it is that no class of persons contributed more to influence the peo- ple of this county during its colonial existence than the Clergy of the various religious societies within it. The Connecticut Congregationalist, the Huguenot, the Reformed Dutch and the Church of England minister < Hawk's MSS. from Archires at Falbam, vol. ii. pp. 26-.'..''>. 5 Bultou " Hist, of Westchester Co.," Tol. ii. p. 2-27. 174 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. served, in his presence and labors, not merely to sup- ply the religious wants of the many who realized them, but to counteract the lowering tendency of the situation and circumstances of the new settler. Wherever any demoralization appeared for the time, one can easily trace it to the absence of this exalting power for the common good. While it is fully allowed that the clashing claims diminished much then, as it does now, the result of professional elforts, it is yet apparent enough how, in the setting forth of the moral code, in the urgent use of ordinances and cus- toms, in encouraging calls to individual reform, in the exhibition of the results of good and evil, in the dis- countenancing — sometimes denunciation — ofbadmen, inthe enforcement of rights, individual and magisterial, as well as those Divine, in examples of domestic felicity and order, — in these and so many other ways the serv- ant of God and friend of the people filled up his mis- sion of usefulness. In a scattered population, growing in eighty years from one thousand one hundred to six- ; teeu thousand, these clergy, never ten in number at one time, in some decades not more than three, held up in the most remarkable manner in the face of all opposing influences the moral tone of the various com- munities of the County. Of course, traditional senti- ments and healthy prejudices, still fresh, much assist- ed, and might be readily invoked ; for a very large pro- portion of the Westchester new-comers were relig- ious people. But the gratifying fact is the more con- spicuous, as, amid much to discourage them, the stand- ard under the care and efforts of godly men is again and again restored. No doubt a great source of their strength was the establishment of the Christian dogma by law. The assistance, too, of the Society for Propa- gating the Gospel in Foreign Parts could not but bear witness in the minds of thoughtful people to the value of Christian truth and duty felt by the devout and humane peojjle of the mother-country in thus as- sisting in the support of the colonial clergy. But the teachers who seeing these points with the people, and in private and public discourse taking care that they should not fail of appreciating them, the more courageously and effectively delivered and •urged the Word of God. In the month of July 1719, Rev. John Bartow, taking for his text, Jeremiah xiv. 22 : " Are there any among the vanities of the Gen- tiles that can cause rain? or can the heavens give showers? Art not thou he, O Lord, our God ; there- fore we will wait upon thee, for thou hast made all these things." Taking up the words of his text, evi- dently upon the last expression, he comments as follows : " Xow, by waiting upon God, in the Pro- phet's phrase is undoubtedly meant, The making our humble addresses daj' by day unto ye most wise and perfect being, who is endowed with Infinite power and goodness, the author of our life and well-being, who formed our bodys of the dust and created our s?)uls out of nothing, who iu his unsearchable provi- dences placed us in this material world and controuls influences and directs every accident that can befall us, whilst we continue here, and therefore to wait upon God in ye actual exercise of such desires and affections as acknowledge God to be the author and giver of all things is most reasonable and tending to our own comfort in all our temporal and Eternal Interests." Worldliness and vice were thus by public sentiment under the ban and the maxims and manners that are so elevating countenanced. It is but fair to remember these gentlemen in the difficulties they met with. Isolated, meagrely support- ed, separated from each other, if not by distance, more by questions that did not allow of confidence, with so many frowns upon them, either from the people or from the ruling power in the colony, they yet went on quietly in their work, to the untold advantage of the County. The Rev. Dr. Johnson, President of King's College, in a sermon at East Chester, in 1755, from Heb, xiii. 1-1: "For here have we no continuing city, but we seek one to come " urges, " Let us not be so foolish as to raise any great expectations from this fleeting uncertain world for we shall be wretchedly frustrated and the greatness of the misery of our dis- appointment will be proportioned to the greatness of our expectations." It is, moreover, to be remarked that the influence thus exerted is in a degree to be referred to the extended pastorates of a number of the clergy, half a dozen of them at least lasting over thirty years. It is also suggested with no little pleasure that what Dr. Dougla.ss, quoted by William Smith, the historian of New York, absurdly proposes in order to increase the usefulness of the clergj', was realized for their people iu the intermarriage of their children. "Our missionaries," says this far-sighted propagand- ist, " may procure a perpetual alliance and commer- cial advantages with the Indians, which the Roman Catholic clergy cannot do, because they forbid to mar- ry. I mean our missionaries may intermarry with the daughters of the Sachems, and other considerable Indians, and their progeny will forever be a certain cement between us and the Indians." Contempt for such insolencell' But as from the fireside of a Bartow, a Wetmore, a Smith, a Sackett, a Mead, a White, a Thomas, a Monroe went forth son or daughter, to be joined unto godly wife or husband, to perj>etuate the principles and heart wishes of their devoted fathere, date the commence- ment of influences for the highest welfare of the peo- ple, which in their eflects are seen as visibly in the post-Revolutionary periods as in the years before the strife. Nor is it amiss in this connection, when speak- ing of the usefulness of the Westchester clergy, to mention the moral support which they received from the efforts and assistance of prominent citizens of the county and province during these eighty years. Col. Caleb Heathcote here readily recurs to mind. He was 1 Smith's New York Carej Ed. p. 247. DoiiglBS*, Sam. A C, toI. ii. p. 13S, Buston Edit. 175:!. THE COLONIAL PERIOD. 175 a conscientious and devout gentleman, whose convic- tions of trutii and duty were definite and decided. His pliilantliropy was broad and absorbing ; but his courage was ever moderated by liis prudence. " Art- ful," he was never. No good man ever misunderstood him, nor without regret withstood him. He was the friend of all that were striving for the public good, and it is not too much to say that the dissenting preacher as well as the Church of England priest had a kind and a wise word Irom him. Throughout this county the odor of his good work was spread, to the discomfort at the time of none, but the benefit of all. The attempt to change the color of a life, which has been preserved undimmed with one hundred and fifty years of cherished admiration, aflbrds little evi- dence of sagacity. It is far better to account for its successes, if not by the truth of the principles which swayed it, then by the purity and loveliness of that natural character which they brought to such per- fection and winning attractiveness. But we must not omit here the judicious use which the Church of England clergy made, through the liberality and wisdom of the Society for Pro- pagating the Gospel, of two instrumentalities — schoolmasters and religious books — in furthering the best interests of the people of the county. West- chester, East Chester, Rye, New Rochelle, North Castle, Yonkers, Mile Square, White Plains, at the instigation and under the direction of the clergy, were provided almost continuously with school ad- vantages. Says Dr. Berrien, in his " History of Trinity Church, New York," " There is nothing with which I have been so much struck as the zeal, the earnestness and devotedness of the school-mast- ers and catechists of that day. The former seem to have been selected from among the laity with great caution and care. . . Some of these were men of liberal education. . . . Intellectual was not then, to the extent that it is now, separated from religious improvement, but both went hand in hand throughout the iceel:."^ What the wise Rector of Trinity says of the schoolmasters of his parish was equally true of those whose work was in Westchester County. In answer to the question of the society, " Have you in your parish any public school for the instruction of youth ? If you have, is it endowed, and who is the master?" the Rev. John Bartow answers: We have a public school in Westchester, of which Mr. Forster is the society's schoolmaster, and we have private schools in other places — no endowment. Some fam- ily of the name of Pelham that are adjacent come to East Chester Church." - The following are the names of some of the school- masters of the county in colonial times : Delpech, Forster, Cleator, Collier, Dwight, Purdy, Timothy Wetmore, James Wetmore, Basil Bartow, Thomas > Pages 86-S7. -New York history from archives at Fulham, Vol. 1, 635. Huddlestone, John Carhart, William Sturgeon, John Rand, John Avery, Daniel Clarke, Charles Glover, Nathiiniel Seabury, George Young, Mr. Gott. The presence of these educated men in the com- munity as levers of usefulness was not a little aided by the circulation among the people of books of sterling merit on theology and practical religion and smaller essays treating on subjects of passing interest.' Some of these treatises were controversial, which characteristic in those days was not at all incon- genial; many of them would be regarded in our times as very dryly written, but not so by those early settlers. Among the volumes known to be furnished by the Society, were Beveridge's several works, Lewis' Catechisms, Taylor's Holy Living and Dying, The Whole Duty of Man,* Leslie's Discour- ses, Bishop Potter on Church Government, Dr. Bray's books. Hooker's Eccles. Polity, Hoadly vs. Calamy. Of course there were other books which were reach- ing the people, some of lowering tendency, some with teachings that the books spoken of were to antidote ; but it must be evident, that all this reading, limited as compared with that of our day, both as to range and extent, must have quickened the intellectual and elevated the moral tone. The clergy here were giving the same direction to the thought of the people, towards the true, the good and the useful, that they were pursuing and urging in their dis- courses. Relations of the County to the Colony.— It will be quite evident from what has been presented that the county of Westchester occupied no passive position in the progress of the colony of New York, but largely assisted in the development of the city and the regions upon which it was continually advancing. What must be said of the influence of the towns upon each other is true also of their bearings upon the intellectual, social and religious condition of the whole Province. The energy, sturdiness, promptness and firmness of the inhabitants were everywhere ap- preciated, and while much was received, much was communicated. Sometimes the excessive ardor of the populace found its check in the sober thoughtfulness, the festina lente temper of their country neighbors on the north, and sometimes the dormant sensibility to justice and right was stirred to activity and fervor by boiling floods of resentment pouring down from our Westchester hills. But the relations between these portions were too continuously intimate to allow much of spasmodic action. A more correct statement of what was taking place is that the difl'erent portions of the province were all contributing to the making up of its general character and fortune, and this county was among the most potential. 3 Vule UeDdersou Walker Letter to Ld. Bp. LoDdoD, Prot. Episc. Hist. Soc. Coll., vol, 1851, p. 182. I bered Keal Estate worth Forty Pounds, agreeably to the Act of Jlay 8, 1G99, could vote, in Colo- nial Westchester-connty ; but, on the other hand, the Freeliolders on the Cortlandt Manor possessed and, undoubtedly, exercised the Right to vote twice, at every such Election for KopresentJitiTes to the General .Assem- bly— that for the Represeut;»tivo for the Manor, under the Jlanorial ("barter, and that for the two Representatives for the County, under the Statute, already mentioned. Of course, the great body of the Tenantry, no matter how valuable its Leaseholds might be ; those whose humble home.s were not worth, in each instance. Forty Pounds; and those whose Freeholds, of every value, which were encumbered by debts, had not the right of voting at the Polls. The practical effect of that limitation of the Kight of Franchise may be seen in the Returns of Elections. In the Election for Repieseutativcs for the City of New York, held on the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nine- teenth of February, ITiil, only fourteen hundred and forty-seven votes, including those of the Freemen of the City who were not, also. Free- holders, were cast. — (The oritjinal Itelitrns of the Iiixpertors, in manu- script, owned by us.) In the Election for Representatives for the City of New-York, held on the seventh, eighth, and ninth of March, 17G8, when an intense excitement prevailed and all known means for increas- ing its strength were resorted to, by each of the antagonistic parties, nineteen hundred and twenty-seven votes, including those of eight hun- dreayer, also a member of the State and a voter. ♦Rivingtou said the aggregate vote was a thousand and seventy-two. were required to respect) constituting, also, another and entirely independent factor in the political ele- ments of that period, in each of the several Colonies, which, in its very important relations with the poli- tics and the politicians of its day, must, also, be gen- erally disregarded, in this place, because it, and its aspirations, and its doings, are not, generally, germain to the purposes of this work. To other hands, there- fore, must be left the labor of describing, in detail, the bold and persistent opposition of the Merchants "and Tradere" to those long-established Navigation and Revenue Laws, which, by reason of a more hon- est administration of them, by those whom the com- mercial classes had not succeeded in corrupting with their accustomed bribes, had so seriously interfered with the very profitable "illicit trade" — that more elegant phrase which was used, and which continues to be u.sed, to describe what, elsewhere and among less comely offenders, was and is called by the more expressive term of "SMrGOLiNc;" — in which those "Merchants and Traders" had been so long and so profitably engaged; ' and we can only glance, also, at that subsequently adopted system of intimidation which had been resorted to, by the same confederated mercantile offenders, under the guise of patriotism, but really for the promotion of their own selfish pur- poses, in their employment and direction of that other, less responsible and, not unfrequently, less respectable, populace, a marketable class which every lai'ge seaport can produce, sometimes in one manner and sometimes in another, quietly or violently, as had best answered the ends of those who had em- ' "Tlie dispute In-'tween Great Britain and America commenced in the "year 1764, with an attempt to jirevent smuggling in America." — A Collection of Inlrresling, Aulhentic Papers relative to the Dispute between Great Britain and America. 17G4 to 1775. London: 1777 — commonly known as Alnion"s Prior Documents — 3. See, also, the following official announcement, which was published in Parker's Sew- York Gazette ; or, the Weekli/ Post-boy, No. 932, New Y'ouK, Thursday, November 13th, 1760, which tells the whole story : "Custom-house, New-Y"ork, Nov. 11th, 1760. " WHERE.\S wo are informed, that some of our Traders fron> Foreign " Ports, are now, and have been for some Time, hovering in the Sound "on the Coast, with the View, as it is supposed, clandestinely to discharge "their Cargoes; a Practice highly prejudicial to His Majesty's Interest, "to the Trade of Great-Britain, and inconsistent with that Duty, and "Gratitude we owe to our Mother Country, almost exhausted with "Taxes raised for our Support and Defence. And not less injurious to "the fair Trader; who having paid high Duties, cannot be supposed to "sell so cheap, as those that pay no Duties, and of Course must lie great "Sufferers. That this has been the Case, and is like to be the Case "again, is notoriously known ; and all for the Sitke of enriching a few "Smugglers; which together with that of supplying our Enemies with "Provisions,* will be an eternal Reproach to our Countrj-. No gixxi " Slaii therefore, nor good Citizen, it is to be hoped, w ill hesitate in "giving all the Discouragement in his Power, to such ignominious "Practices. Informations, ojM'nly, or privately will be thankfully re- "ceived, and gratefully, if retpiired, rewapled, by "THE OFFICERS OF HIS MAJESTY'S CUSTOMS." * At that time. Great Britain was at War with France and S|)ain, to whose Colonies, in the West Indies es|)ecially. Provisions were taken, by the Colonial Merchants, in exchange for those Goods, of foreign grow th and production, which they sought to smuggle into the British Colonies, on the Atlantic seaKutrd, as aliove stated. 182 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. ployed it, to resist the execution of the Stamp-Act, to prevent the lauding of the East India Company's Tea, and to make other demonstrations of seeming popular approval or disapproval, on other subjects of public polity or of governmental policy, whenever the political or the pecuniary interests of those "Gentlemen in Trade" who had employed it, seemed to warrant the outlay of the means which had been required to produce a desired result: to our hand, meanwhile, can be assigned, of all the various impor- tant subjects comprising the political and military histories of the Colony or of the Continent, at all periods, only the description of those events, during the period of the American Eevolution and that of the War which followed and established that political Revolution, which, in themselves or in the conse- quences arising from them, directly aft'ected the peace, the happiness, or the interests of those who, during those eventful periods, were residents of the rural County of Westchester, in New York. The urgent appeals with which the newspapers had been filled, year by year, and the inflammatory hand- bills which had been posted throughout the City, whenever the purposes of " the Merchants and " Tradei-s " of the City of New York had required their powerful, but, sometimes, questionable, co oper- ation in opposing the Colonial policy of the Home Government, had gradually taught " the Inhabitants" of that City —as, on such occasions only, the unfran- chised Mechanics and Workingmen were delicately called, by those who had thus resorted to them — with more or less thoroughness, concerning the personal and political " Rights of Man and of Englishmen," as those Rights had been defined, from time to time, by those " Merchants and Traders " or by their well-paid Counsel, for the promotion of the ])articular purposes of those more aristocratic gentlemen ; and these " In- " habitants " had also learned, from all those varied teachings and from their own well-trained reflections, that the particular Rights w-hicli had been so earn- estly and learnedly claimed by their high-toned neighbors, were not less the Rights of the unfran- chised masses, and equally the birthright of their children. Little by little, therefore, under the leader- ship of, probably, not more than half a dozen shrewd and able and ambitious men, generally of higher social and political standing than themselves, these " In- " habitants " began to grow uneasy and insubordinate, if not radically revolutionary ; and the confederated " Merchants and Traders " and the more aristocratic portion of the citizens who were not in Trade were as quickly made sensible that a power had been created and fostered, by themselves, for their own lawless purposes, which, because of its tendency to- wards a radical Revolution in both the social and politi- cal relations of the Colony, they were no longer able to control — a power, indeed, which, if it were notspeed- ily and effectually checked, would surely overwhelm them and, probably, involve the Colony and the Con- tinent in revolution and disaster. At the same time, it was clearly seen by those careful observers of the signs of the times, that any attempt to abridge the existing power of the unfranchised " Inhabitants" of the City, and, especially, that of those who were less scrupulous in the selection of their means, by open and direct measures, would, probably, induce the latter to employ, in their own behalf, that system of violence which they had been taught to regard as commenda- ble and praiseworthy, when they had employed it in behalf of others; and it was seen, also, by those who had become alarmed by the strength and the audacity of that new element in Colonial politics, strengthened, as it evidently was, by its affiliation with the radically revolutionary elements in New England, the ma- chinery of the by-gone Committees of Correspondence being controlled by it, that, in order to check its growing power, or to secure any change whatever, in the control of it, or to retain the control of the poli- tics of the Colony, great caution and great tact, if not great promptness and great boldness, at some auspi- cious moment, would be absolutely necessary. An evident danger silenced those who, under other cir- cumstances, would, probably, have favored the employment of other and more direct means: wise counsels prevailed among those who were thus con- sidering in what manner the evidently rising power and audacity of the unfranchised and revolutionary masses could be controlled, without disturbing the peace of the City and the Colony: and it was deter- mined, with much shrewdness, to resort to "art," at the earliest favorable opportunity, for the accom- plishment of their well-concealed purposes.' Such an opportunity as was desired for the purposes referred to, was very soon afforded. The tea-laden Xuncy, Captain Lockyer, had been turned back to Europe, without having been permit- ted to enter the harbor ; ' the cargo of the London, Captain Chambers, had been overhauled, inWhitehall- slip, in open day, by men wearing no disguises; and eighteen chests of Tea, which had been concealed in her hold, had been emptied into the East-river ; and the populace was quietly leposing on the revolution- 1 .\Uhough there is abundant evi'Ience to support this statement, it has been sn completely and so graphically presented by Gouvcrneur Morris, in a letter addressed to 3Ir. Penn, whicli will be printed, /h exteiifo^ on page 12-32, post, that no other is regarded as necessary, in this place. - Holt's -VfiD -York Jotimo!, No. ItS^i, Kew-Yobk, Thursday, April 21, and Xo. 1G34, Xew-Youk, Thui-sday, April 28, ITTl; Gaine's Neiv-Ynrk Gazette mid Mercury, No. 1174, NEW-YoitK, Monday, April 25, 1774 ; Lieuteimnt-ffovfnior CoUlen to the Earl of iHtrtmouth, *'New York, 4th '* May, 1774," and the eitdomre therein ; the same to Governor Tnjon, "New " Y'oRK, 4th May, 1774 ; " Dunlap's Historij of the Seio Netherlands, Prov- ince of Xew York, n lid Slate of Sen; York, i., 452, 453; Leake'8 Memoir of the Li fe and Times of General John Lamb, 81-84 ; Dawson's I7/« Purl- and its Vicinit)/, in the City of Sew York, 20-31 ; Graham's History of the United States, iv , 329 ; Hiklreth s History of the IMited States, iii., 31 ; Gordon's History of the American Revotiition, i., 332-3.34 ; etc. 3 Holt's yeu-York Journal, No. 1G34, New-York, Thursday, April 28, 1774 ; Gaine's Xeic-York Gazette and Mercury, No. 1174, New-York, Mon- day, .\pril 25, 1774 ; Lieutenant-governor Colden to the Earl of Dartmouth, "New-York, 4th May, 1774," and the enclosure therein ; the same to Gov- THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 183 ary honors which, in the interest of the commercial classes, it had again secured.' The master-si)irits of ernor Trijo*. "Xew York, 4th May, 1774 ;" Dunlap's York, i., 452, 453 ; Leake's Lamb, 82-84 ; Dawson's Pari and its Vicinily, 3(1, 31 ; Hildreth's fnited Slulet, iii., 31. Notwithstanding the greater significance of the cpposition of Xew York to tlio Tea-tax, wjiich was seen in the resolute refusal to allow the storm-shattered .Vmicj to enter the harbor; in the examination of the cargo of the London, and the open destruction of her concealed Tea, in the light of day, by known men who saw no reason for disguising them- selves ; and in the return of the Xancy, to England, by the Commilteo who had taken possession of her, at Sandy Hook ; it has been the cus- tom of Xew England writers to withhold w hatever of honor or dishonor there was in those doings of the party of tlie Opposition, in New York, while the less significant "tea-party " of Boston has been elaborately presented as a feat of great daring and of the highest grade of patriot- ism. Thus, Mercy AVarren {Hinlonj of American lievohilion ;) "Paul Allen" {Hittory of American Rerohdion ;) Thacher {MilUarij Journal ;) Morse (AnnnU of the American RetoMion ;) Pitkin (Hitlonj of the United Stales ;) Frothingham (Rise of the Republic;) Lodge (Short Hitlnrij of English Col- onies ;) and a multitude of othei's, make no mention whatever of the subject of the opposition in Xew York ; and Rincroft, in the octavo edi- tion of his Hislnry of the I'nited Stales, after alluding, in a dozen words, to the storm w hich hail driven the Xew York tea-ship to the West In- dies, very conveniently said no more on the subject — a suppression of the truth which he shabbily attempted to mitif>Rte, in his centenary and "thoroughly revised" edition of that work, by an interpolation of five lines, nearly two of which have no relation whatever to the subject of Xew York's opposition to the tax ; and nearly two others state, in con- nection with the .Vniicy, what every novice in the history of those times knows is entirely untrue, in one of its only two statements concerning her. Strange to say, Lossing, a Xew York writer, with all the original ma- terial within his reach and perfectly accessible, in his Seventeen hundred and sfcenlij sif (jiage 111,1 stated that the .Vniic;/ was returned to Europe, only "because no one could be found that would venture to receive the "tea," without an allusion to her having been stopped at Sandy-hook, and returned, thence, to Europe ; and, also, without the slightest allusion to the London and to what became of her tea. In his History of the I'ni- ledSlates, (page 22U all that appears, concerning either the Xancy or the London is that (A?;/ " returned to England with their cargoes '' ; although the Xancy was the only one which thus returned, and then only because she was conii>el!eil to return. In his Field Bnr.k of the Revulution, after having devoted five pages to the Boston "Tea-party" li., 497-5(i2) he ventured to appropriate ten lines to the greatly more significant doings of Xew Y'ork, on the same subject. ' On the fifth of March, 1770, while the motion of Lord Xorth for " leave to bring in a Bill to repeal the Tax Act, as far as related to the "tax on Paper, Glass, and Painters" Colours," was under consideration, before the House of Commons, Governor Pownall, than whom noono was, then, better informed on every subject connected with .Vmerica and the Americans, replied to the Minister, and moved an amendment, to in- clude Tea, also, in the proposed Bill. In the course of his exceedingly important Si)eech, on introducing his motion to amend, the Governor said, "The drawback upon those "Teas, exjwrted to .\merica, of twenty-five per cent, does not amount, "as this argument supposes, to one shilling i>er pound — it amounts to " only sevenpence half-penny, or thereabouts — so that, did it operate as " a bounty, at all, it would amount to only fourpencc half-penny. But "this is not material to the point ; for it does not operate as a bounty, "at all, because whatever duty the East India Coniiiany pays, originally, "at the Custom-house, on the importing of Teas from Asia, that sum is "added to the price of their Tea, in their sales ; so that, although the "exporter to .\merica may be allowed a drawback, yet he draws back " that sum only which he hath already paid in the price of his purchase, "by trhich means, as this article of sujiply new stands, there isanadranlage " in fnrour of the Dutch Teas imported into the Colonies, against the British " Teas, of twenty -five per cent, difference. — (Debrett's History, Debates, and Proceedings of both Houses of Parlioment, 1743 lo 1774, v., iCA). The reader will perceive, therefore, that the opposition to the importa- tion of Tea, into .\merica, with its pailinnientarv- tax imposed on it, which the Merchants instigated and encouraged, in the seai>orts — the opposition was seen no where else than within the shadows of those ports — was composed less of " iMitriotism " than of love of pelf. TheDntch Teas the confederated party of the Opposition — the Gov- ernment and those who favored it having no part in that matter of division among those who were oppos- ing its policy — were evidently seniil)le, however, as has been .said, that that unseemly confederation of radically antagonistic elements, entirely for the pro- motion of the interests of one of those elements without securing a corresponding advantage to the other, was unnatural, and could not be lasting; and it was evident, also, to every one, that an open conflict between the conservative aristocratic and the revolutionary democratic elements of the' population, without reference to matters of governmental policy, and only for the control of the political power, within the City and Colony, was likely to be commenced, at any moment. Just at thut critical period, in May, 1774, advices were received from Europe,' of the Government's pro- posal to close the Port of Boston, with a possibility that that of Xew York would shortly share the same fate ; and it was also said that the Home Government also intended to remove the principal offenders against Ihe Laws, within the Colonies, that they might be tried and punished in England.' With great tact and )>lau- sibility and a greater pretension to patriotism, the confederated "Merchants and Traders" and those who possessed their confidence promptly seized that much desired opportunity, for the accomplishment of their sinister purposes; and, with that end in view, they boldly and promptly occupied the place of leaders of the entire City and Colony, in protesting against those measures of the Home Government, and in jiro- vidiug for a systematic opposition to those measures, under their own particular direction, without, how- ever, having recognized the existence or inviteil the co-operation of the respectable popular element, within the City, nor those of the very few who really repre- sented and controlled that more unruly element of which mobs were comjjosed, both of which omissions, the meaning of which was very evident, subsetain Couper, the latest shi]! from Lomlon. t ^ Extracts from private letters from London, dated April 7 and 8, -fo "persons in Xeir York and Philadelphia," printed on the backs of copies of the Boston Port Bill, and circnlated, in broadside form, in Xew York, Slay 14, 1774. 184 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " sures proper to be pursued on the present critical "and important occasion."' It will be seen that no others than " the Merchants " of the City were invited to attend the proposed Caucus, at Sam. Francis's Long-room ; - and that the published purpose was only "to consult on measures proper to " be pursued on the present critical and important "occasion," in neither of which features of the " Ad- " vertisement," prima facie, can it be reasonably said that any stretch of authority had been attempted by those who had called the proposed Caucus — surely, it will not be said there might not be consultations, among Merchants as well as among other classes of the citizens, on any subject whatever, especially on subjects in which they were especially interested, without interference from any other class ; and it will hardly be pretended by any one, that, in the instance now under consideration, the Merchants of the City were not peculiarly interested in the subjects of " the " late extraordinary and very alarming advices from "' England ; " that they might not properly " consult," among themselves, " on measures proper to be pur- "sued on the present critical and important occa- " sion ; " that, for the purpose of such a " consulta- "tion," they might not invite whomsoever they pleased, to meet at a place and time designated, with- out consulting with any other persons or asking permission from any others; and that such a Caucus, thus invited, might not be had, without any interfe- ^ Minutesof the Netv York Committee of Correspondence. IMonday, 5Iay 19, 1774 ; Lieutenant-governor Colden to Gorernor Tryon, " Sprino Hill, "31st May, 1774 ; " the same lo the Earl of Dartmouth, " New York, 1st "June, 1774;" Gonveni'-vr Morris to Mr. Penn, " New York, May 20, " 1774;" Joneses Histori/ of Xew York dtirimj the lierolutionart/ War, i., 34 ; etc. - "Sam. Francis," at that time and during many years subsequently, was a noted restaurali ur, known to and resijectej by every one, of every sect and party, in the City of New Yorli, during tlu' Intercolonial period, during the entire War, and after the restoration of Peace. " Francis's Tavern," where this Caucus was held, had been, at an ear- lier period, the residence of the De Lancey Family. It was built in 1701, by Etienne De Lancey, on a lot of ground which Stephanus Van C'ort- landt had given to his daughter, Anne, when, in the preceding year, that lady was married to Jlr. De Lancey; and it is still standing on the north- ea-stern corner of Broad and Pearl-streets, the oldest building in the City of New York. " Francis's Long-room," in which this Caucus was held, subsequently became more famous than it had previously beeTi, Ijecause it was the room iu which the Officers of the Army of the Revolution assembled, on Thursday, the fourth of December, 1783, after the enemy had evacuated the City and the Peace had been entirely established, to take their final leave of their illustrious Chief ; and from which, accompanied by his sorrowful friends — " a solemn, mute, and mournful procession, with " heads hanging down and dejected countenances " — he walked, directly, to Whitehall-slip, and was rowed, thence, to Powle's Hook, now Jei-sey City, on his way to Annapolis, to which place the Congress had ad- journed, to resign the Command of the Army, with which he had been invested, in 1773. — (Gordon's Hislori/ of the H'nr of the Revolution, iv., 38.3, 384; Marshall's Life of WashinQlou, (I'hila. Edit.) iv., G19, G20 ; etc.) It is proper to be said, in that connection, that Samuel Francis was " a mau of dark complexion," probably a mulatto ; that he was known, ordinarily, as "lilackSam ;" and that, when General Washington en- tered the City, on the twenty-tiftli of November, •' he took up his liead- " quarters at the Tavern " of that dusky landlord. — (Dunlap's Hislnrii of New York, ii., 233, the author of which related these circumstances from his own personal knowledge of them.) rence from any one. There was no appearance of deception in the "Advertisement" through which the Caucus had been invited, in the instance under con- sideration ; and, subsequently, when the Caucus assembled, no attempt appears to have been made to do anything more than the "Advertisement'' had authorized, notwithstanding those who had been spe- cifically invited and were present, so largely outnum- bered those uninvited intruders who opposed them, that any change from the terms of the " Advertisement " which they were inclined to make, could have been made — indeed, it appears to have been intended, by the Merchants, only for consultation and for the orderly preparation of measures to be submitted to the body of the inhabitants of the City, at a Meeting to be called for that purpose, for their approval or disapproval, without losing sight, however, of what was the real, substantial purpose of the movement. But those who had hitherto assumed to be the leaders of the unfran- chised masses — the leaders, in fact, however, of only the radically revolutionary portions of those masses, — saw, or assumed to have seen, in that proposed Caucus, a movement which promised to break the hold on the unfranchised element which, since the era of the Stamp Act, they had unceasingly claimed to have maintained ; ^ and to transfer, to some extent, at least, some portion of the leadership of that uncer- tain and, sometimes, unruly element, in the political aftairs of the Colony, to others; and Isaac Sears and his handful of kindred associates, with that audacious disregard of the unquestionable Rights of others which, subsequently, became so conspicuously noto- rious and oppressive, not only determined to thrust themselves into a Caucus to which they had not been invited, but to turn the action of that Caucus from the purposes of those who had called it, and to give to that action a character and direction which would be entirely foreign to the purposes for which the Caucus had been invited. The consequences of that proposed intrusion and the ill success of that scheme to oust those who had invited the Caucus and to turn into other channels than those which the latter had pro- posed, the action and influence of the Caucus itself, will be seen in the published narrative of the proceed- ings of that notable assemblage — meanwhile, it will be evident to every careful observer, that that separa- tion of the radically antagonistic social and political elements which, united, formed, at that time, the 3 The Meeting, at Burns's Coffee-house, on tli£ evening of the thirty- first of October, 17ti5, for the adoption of measures to prevent the execu- tion of the Stamp-.\ct, appointed a Committee of Correspondence, com- posed of Isaac Seaif , John Lamb, Gershom Mott, William Wiley, and Thomas Robinson, to give better effect to its Resolutions, by securing harmonious action, thereon, throughout the entire Continent. The re- peal of that obnoxious Statute, of course, rendered that appointment inoperative ; but those who had constituted that Committee, with a half dozen associates, continued to exercise an authority and leadership, among the unorganized and marketable elements, in the City, until the opening of the War, in 1775, when several of those leaders secured of- fices, and ceased to be the "patriotic " leaders of those who, then, more than ever, needed intelligent leaders. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 185 ])olitical conglomerate in which had been combined, for ])urely selfish purposes, the fragmentarj' opposition, in tlie Colony of New York, to the Home Govern- ment wliich was then in authority (each of those antagonistic elements being, in pretension, if not in fact, equally zealous in its loyalty to their common Sovereign) was produced by less of respect for righteousness in politics and of a genuine patriotism than of thirst for individual gain to be derived, as was then supposed, from the internal control of the party of the Opposition and of what should be gained through it — just such a factional contest, within a party composed of radically discordant elements, united for purposes which had served to combine those elements into one body, indeed, as have been seen, very frequently, and such as may be seen, now, not only in New York, but in evei'y other commun- ity in which such ill-formed parties are permitted to exist, and to intrigue, and to deceive.' At the appointed hour, on Monday, the sixteenth of ^lay, the Long-room, in Sam. Francis's Tavern,-' was crowded with anxious and determined men, evi- dently not entirely of one mind, and not indisposed, in some instances, at least, to enforce whatever differ- ences of opinion and purpose might arise, with some- thing more tangible than words, should such an enforcement, in their opinion, become necessary. Those whom the " Advertisement " had invited were present, in large numbers, and evidently well-pre- pared for harmonious and decisive action, limited only by the terms of the invitation ; and there were present, also, in much smaller numbers, including 1 Tlie leader need only turn to the history of existing political parties, held together by "the cohesive power of public pUindor," for an illus- tration of the structure, the aims, and the policy of tliat confederated party of the Opposition, in Colonial New York, aneal to the body of the inhabitants. With a complete knowl- edge of the small number of those who had ])reviously assumed to represent the masses of the unfranchised inhabitants, and with as complete a knowledge of the general harmlessness of those masses, in the absence of their self-constituted leaders, the high-toned pro- moters of the uni)ublished scheme of abridging the political power of the great body of the people had disarmed the former of their animosity, by rendering them harmless, as the helpless minority of the Com- mittee of Fifty-one* — an empty honor with which, however, for the time being, they were evidently satisfied — while the latter were made contented, for a. short time, also, by receiving a recognition of their political preten:iions, in the privilege which was ex- tended to them of confirming or rejecting the nomi- nations made by the Caucus, among whom, with two or three exceptions, the names of their self-constituted leaders were conspicuously presented. ' ^ Lieiileiuinl-governor Golden to Governor Trijon, " SrRiNG-HiLL 31st " May, 1774 ; " the ««m« to the Earl of Dartmonlh, "New York June 1st " 1774 ; ■' Jones's IIMori/ of Xeio York durinij the Revoluliniinrii War, i., .34 ; Leake's Memoir of General John Lamb, 87 ; Dawson's History of the Park and Us Vichiily, Xi ; Bancroft's U'lited Slates, original eilition, vii., 41, 42 ; the same, centenary edition, iv., 327 ; etc. Of the fifty-one members of the Committee, a very great majority were of the aristocratic, conservative, anti revolutionary portions of the inhab- itants. On the fourth of July, when a test question was before it, thirty- eight niemliei-s being present, only thirteen votes were cast by those who assumed to represent the unfranchised inhabitants ; and in the greater contest, three days afterwards, on Mr. Thui ber's Resolution, disavowing the proceedings of the great popiilar "Jleeting in the Fields," over which Alexander McDougal had presided, only nine votes were cast in opposition to the vote of ilisavowal. It may also be stated, in this place, that, notwithstanding none of th& fifty-one, at that time, were of the Governmental party, but, on the con- trary, that every one was earnestly opposed to the Colonial policy of the Home Government, twenty-one of the number, at a subsequent period, became acknowledged Loyalists ; that a considerable number took no active part in the proceedings of the Committee, but could have beei> relied on, by the aristocratic, conservative leaders, had their presence and their votes been, at any time, needed ; and that a greater number than there were of the last-named class — a working majority of the Commit- tee, indeed — included such as .lohn .\lsop, Gabriel II. Ludlow, .lohn Jay, and .Tames Duane, who invariably acted and voted with the aristocratic, anti-revolutionary portion of the Connnittee, and, until they became candidates for the Congress, always in opposition to the revolutionary leaders and the revolutionary purjioses. Well might the exiled Judge, Thomas Jones, writing of this Commit- tee, in the light of subsequent events, say, within ten years of its crea- tion, notwithstanding what he hadsaid of the opposition to the Colonial policy of the Home Government, which all of then> had presented, " The "majority were real friends to Government." —{Ilislory of Xeir York dur- ing the lierohitionnrij War, i., 34.1 - For the purptxse of providing an additional authority, concerning much that has been stated, in this work, concerning the relations which existed between the confederated " Men-bants anil Trailers " and other high-toned citi/.ens, and the more numerous, but unfranchised, " Inhabi- " tauts of the City and County ; " concerning the desire of the former to abridge the influence which had been secured by the latter, while they were subject to the frequent appeals of the former ; and concerning the formation of the "Committee of Correspondence," since known as the "Committee of Fifty one," for the purpose of recovering, to the confeil- ' erated, conservative " Merchants and Traders " ami the Gentry, the con- j trol of the political affaire of the City, we invite attention to the follow- ing very important Letter, written by a Westchester-county gentleman, I who, when he could do longer ser\'c the party of the Home Government, 188 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. The Committee which was thus created by the aris- tocratic, anti-revolutionary portion of those who, at that time, were opposing the Colonial policy of the Home Government, was largely intended, as we have shown, to serve as a check on the rising power, in political affairs, of the unfranchised Mechanics and Workingmen of the City of New York, especially of the revolutionary faction of those Working-men, while it would tend, also, to concentrate in "the Merchants "and Traders" and Gentry of the City, thus confed- erated for the exercise of it, all of that political power, especially in matters of national concern, which that City and Province, at that time, could command, without the existence of a thought, among those who had promoted the scheme, if such a thought had any- was among the earliest to become its nominal opponent ; and, subse- quently, to pose as a distinguished " patriot " and as a not less distin- guished republican statesman : "New York, May 20, 1774. " Dear Sir : "You have heard, and you will hear, a E;reat doiil about politics ; ■" and in the heap of ChafT you may find some grains of good sense. Be- " lieve me. Sir, Freedoui and Rfligion are only watchwords. We have "appointed a Ciimmittee, or, rather, we have nominated one. Let me " give you the histoi'y of it. "It is needless to premise, that the lower orders of Mankind are more " easily led by specious appearances than those of a more exalted station. "This, and many similar propositions, you know better than your hum- " hie servant. " The troubles in ylnw'rir«, during (?rcHri//e"« .\dministratiou, put our " Gentry uj)un this,;ii(e««e. They stimulated some daring Coxcombs to "rouse the Mob into an attack upon tlie bounds of order and decency. " These fellows became the Jack Cwies of the day, the Leaders in all the " Riots, the Bellwethere of the I'lock. The reason of the manuMivru, in " those who wished to keep fair with the Government and, at the same "time, to receive the incense of popular applause, you will readily per- **ceive. On the whole, the Shepanls were not much to blame, in a po- " litical point of view. The Bellwethers jingled merrily, and roared " out, ' Liberty,' and 'Property," and 'Religion,' and a multitude of " cant terms, which every one thought he understood, and was egregi- " onsly mistaken ; for you must know the Shepherdskept the Dictionary "of the Day ; and, like the Mysteries of the ancient Mythology, it was " not for profane eyes and ears. This answered many purposes: the "simple Flock put themselves entirely under the protection of these " most excellent Shepherds. " By-and-bye, behold a great metamorphosis, witboiit the help of Ovid " or his Divinities ; but entirely effectuated by two modern Genii, the "God of .\mbition and the Goddess of Faction. The first of these " proiupted the Shepherds to shear some of their Flock; and, then, in "conjunction with the other, converted the Bellwethers into Sliepherds. " That we have been in hot water with the British Parliament, ever "since, every body knows : consequently these new Shepherds havehad " their hands full of employment. The old ones kept themselves least in "sight ; and a want of confidence in each other was not the least evil "which followed. The Port of li'intoii has been shut u]). These Sheep, "simple as they are, cannot be gulled, as heretofore. In short, there is " no ruling them ; and, now, to leave the metaphor, the heads of the " Jlobility grow dangerous to the Gentry ; and how to keep them down " is the question. "While they correspond with the other Colonies, call and dismiss "popular ,\ssemblies, make Resolves to bind the Conscit-nces of the rest "of Mankind, bully poor Printers, and exert with full force all their "other tribunitial powers, it is impossible to cnrb them. But .\rt some- " times goes farther than Force ; and, therefore, to trick them hand- "soniely, a Committee of Patricians was to be nominated ; and into their "hands was to be committed the Majesty of the People ; and the highest " trust was to be reposed in them by a mandate that they should take "care, quod rt!t>pnhlica non capitU iujuriam. The Tribunes, through the " want of good legerdemain in the senatorial order, perceived the finesse ; "and, yesterday, I was present at a granil division of the City; and, "there, I beheld my fellow -citizens very accurately counting all their a people, at such a time, and under such circumstances as then existed, and which would probably continue to exist, might, also, sensibly or insensibly, weaken if where existed, that such an organization, among such it should not destroy all those bonds of recognized dependence, and loyalty, and love, which, hitherto, had so firmly bound the Colony to the Mother Country. But, notwithstanding the evident intentions of those among whom the thought of creating such a Com- mittee had originated; notwithstanding the purposes for which it had been created included no such pur- pose; and notwithstanding a separation of the Colo- nies from the Mother Country had not yet become one of the questions of the day, that Committee of Corre- spondence in the City of New York, created and "Chickens, not only before any of them were hatched, but before above "one half of the Eggs were laid. In short, they fairly contended about "the future forms of our Government, whether it should be founded "upon aristocratic or democratic principles. "I stood in the Balcony ; and, on my right hand were ranged all the "people of property, with some few poor dependants ; and, on the other, " all the Tradesmen, etc., who thought it worth their while to leave "their daily labour for the good of the Countrj'. The spirit of the " English Constitution has yet a little influence left, and but a little. "The remains of it, however, will give the wealthy people a superiority, "this time ; but, would they secure it, they must banish all Scboolnias- " tere and confine all Knowledge to themselves. This cannot be. The "Mob begin to think and to reason. Poor Reptiles ! it is, with them, a " vernal Morning ; they are struggling to cast off their Winter's Slotigh ; "they bask in the Sunshine; and, ere Noon, they will bite, depend "upon it. The Gentry begin to fear this. Their Committee will be "appointed ; they will deceive the People; and, again, they will forfeit "a share of their Confidence. And if these instances of what with one "side is Policy, with the other Perfidy, shall continue to increase, and " become more frequent, farewell, .\ristocracy. I see, and I see it with "fear and trembling, that if the Disputes with Greul Britain continue, "we shall be under the worst of all possible dominions; we shall be " under the domination of a riotous Mob. " It is the interest of all men, therefore, to seek for re-union with the "parent .State. A safe Compact seems, in my poor opinion, to be now "tendered. Internal taxation to he left with ourselves. The right of "regulating Trade to be vested in Britain, where alone is found the "power of protecting it. 1 trust you will agree with me, that this is " the only possible mode of union. * « * « "I am. Sir,, etc,, "Mb. Pe.vx. "Govverneur Morris." It was never pretended, if our memory servos ns correctly, that the writer of this letter was a democratic republican : our readers can easily determine, from his contemptuous words, while describing the unfranchised Mechanics and Working-men of this City, how little of a republican of any other class, how much of a believer of the jiolitical dogma of the unqualified equality of all men, be was, notw ithstanding what some historians, so called, have written of him. In the same spirit, was that note written by James Rivingtou, of New- York, and received by Henry Knox, of Boston, subseipiently a General in the -■Vrmy of the Revolution and Secretary of War under President Washington, and (in his own estimation) never one of the people, which note was detected by the revolutionary leadei-s in Boston, and commu- nicated to the "Sons of Liberty, " in New York, by note, dated 19 June, 177-i. The words iised by Rivingtou were these : " You may rest as- " sured that no non-im-, nor non-ex-portation will be agreed uj^ion "either here or at Philadelphia. The power over our crowd is no "longer in the hands of Sears, Ijamb, and such unimportant persons, " who have for six yeai's past, been the demagogues of a very turbulent "faction in this City; but their power and mischievous capacity ex- " piled in.^tantly uison the election of the Committee of Fifty-one, in "which there is a majority of inflexibly honest, loyal, and prudent "citizens." — [MS. letter of Thomas Young to John Lamb, '-BoSTOV, 19th "June, 1774," in the "Lamb Papers," New York Historical Society's Library.) THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 185) fostered by the most aristocratic of her citizens, from the beginning of its existence, was one of the most powerful of those instrumentalities which, at that very time, were sapping the foundations of the Throne, in the Colonies; and it was through the proposition and the persistent effort of that particular Committee, that, very soon after it was organized, another and yet more influential body was created, composed of influential and able men, mainly from the higher classes of society, by whom, not long afterwards, the Home Government was arraigned before the bar of the entire world, on well-sustained charges of Usurpation and Oppression ; by whom, also, the standard of a united Rebellion of all the Colonies was raised ; and by whom a revolutionary power, united and energetic, extending throughout the entire seaboard, was raised for its support. In opposition to the purposes and the demands of the small revolutionary element, in New York — in opposition, also, to the leaders and the revolutionary populace, in Boston, with whom the revolutionary leaders in New York were in constant corres})ondence and in entire harmony — the Com- mittee which the conservative, anti-revolutionary aristocracy of New York had thus created for the protection and the promotion of its own particular interests, the domestic as well as the foreign, originally proposed and persistently insisted on the organization of a Congress of Delegates from all the Colonies, for the united consideration of a// the matters in dirterence between all the Colonies and the Home Government; and it was that Congress, thus called into existence by an anti-revolutionary body, by assuming authority which had not been delegated to it and by disregard- ing the expressed opinions and intentions of those who were represented therein — at the expense, also, of its own consistency, in excepting one of the Colo- nies from the provisions of its Association, in order to secure the vote of that Colony for the enforcement of that Association upon all the other Colonies — which not only closed the door of reconciliation with the Mother Country, which it was expected to have opened to its widest extent ; but, practically, it organ- ized a systematic and general Revolution, throughout the entire seaboard, which, ultimately, led to the over- throw of all monarchial power, within the entire territory of each and every one of its several constitu- ent Colonies. Such a notable instance of the thing which had been created for a specific purpose, having been turned, in the progress of events, by the tact of a small proportion of its members, without violence and by some of those who had favored and assisted in the construction of it, against the greater number of those who had created it and for the overthrow of their purposes in having done so, as was seen in the instance of that Committee of Correspondence in New York and in its notable results, is w^orthy of notice and remembrance ; and it may well serve, also, as a perpetual reminder, to those whose political conduct has not been altogether honest, and whose inclinations have, sometimes, been directed toward something else than that which has been indicated by their professions, that "There's a Divinity that shapes our euda, "Rough hew them how we will." While the consolidated Opposition, in the City of New York, was thus actively employed in making preparations for a vigorous opposition to the latest measures of the Home Government and, in order to make that opposition more effective, in transferring the leadership of the confederated party of the Oppo- sition from the few who had previously a.ssumed to lead the revolutionary portion of the unfranchised masses, in the violent proceedings in which, from time to time, the latter had been engaged, to the greater number, of higher social and pecuniary and political standing, who formed the large majority of the Com- mittee of Correspondence which it was creating, as its leader, in its opposition to the Ministry, the Town of Boston, also, was anxiously and carefully preparing for the coming catastrophe. On the evening of Tuesday, the tenth of May,' Cap- tain Shayler arrived in the latter place, bringing intelligence of the passage of the Act of Parliament closing that Port. On the following day, Wednesday, the eleventh of May, the Committees of Correspond- ence from eight of the adjacent Towns were invited to meet the Boston Committee, for consultation;'^ and on Thursday, the twelfth of May, those Committees assembled at Faneuil Hall, with Samuel Adams in the Chair and Joseph Warren acting as the leader, on the floor, and determined to send " Circular Letters " to the several Committees of Correspondence, where such Committees existed, in the other Colonies, urging, as the only proposed remedy for the threat- ened grievances, a renewal of that Non-Importation Association which, during the excitement which had followed the passage of the Stamp-Act, had been productive of so much success.* On Friday, the thirteenth of May, a Meeting of the Freeholders and other inhabitants of the Town, legally qualified and duly warned, was holden in Faneuil Hall, Samuel Adams being in the Chair, at which it was voted, " that it is the opinion of this Town, that, if the other " Colonics come into a joint Resolution to stop all " Importation from Great Britain and Exportation to " Great Britain and every part of the West Indies, till 1 The MassuchmelUi GtizeUe of Thursday, May 12, 1774, printed the text of the ISostoii Port-bill, in full, with the following heading : " Tues- " day arrived here Captain Shayler, in a Brig from London, who brought "the most interesting and important Advices that ever was received at "the Port of Boston."' See, also, Bancroft's Hiftory of the I'niled Stales, original edition, vii., 34 ; the «; Pitkin's History of the United States, New Haven : 1828, i., 270 ; Gralianie's History of the I'niled States, London : 1830, iv., 347, 348 ; Hildreth s History of the United States, New Y'ork : 1856, First Series, iii.,34; Leake's Jl/emo/r of General John Lamb, Albany: 1857, 84-86; Lossing's Seventeen hundred and seventy-slf. New York: 122; Lo-ising's Field-book of the lievolulion. New Y'ork : 1851, i., 51)7; Ban- croft's History of the United States, original edition, Boston : 1858, vii., 37 ; the same, centi-nary edition, Boston : 1870, iv., 323 ; Frothingham's Rise of the Republic, Boston : 1872, 321, 322 ; Lodge's History of the Eng- lish Colonies, New York : 1881, 489; etc. Lendrum, (History of the United States ;) Lossiug, [History of the United States, 1854 ;) and Ridpath, (History of the United Statts ;) maile no allusion to this very important Meeting, specifically and definitely laid down, and in no other line whatever, leaving nothing to the choice or the better judgment or the existing circumstances of any others, any where; that even their New England ingenuity contrived no other remedy Jor their merely local grievance than that speciJc suspension of the entire agricultural and manufacturing industries of all the Colonies, except to the extent of supplying the demand for the productions of their industries for home-consumption only, as well as the specific sus- pension of all the Commerce of all the Colonies, except that with the French Colonies of St. Pierre and Miquelon, on the coast of Newfoundland — with which, by the bye, so large a portion of the smuggling by Massachusetts -men was, then and subsequently, carried on^ — all of which, without any possible abatement, they definitely proposed and positively insisted on ; and that, in their complacency, they dared, also, to assert, if not to threaten, that the con- sequence of disobedience to their audacious proposi- tion, in any of the Colonies, would be the triumphant rise of Fraud, Power, and the most odious Oppression, over Right, Justice, Social. Happiness, and Freedom.' In short, the principles and " patriotic " impulses of those men of Boston began and ended in the proposed promotion of nothing else than their own individual and local interests, at the expense of the entire prostration of business, internal as well as external, except that of Smuggling, from one extremity to the other of the Atlantic seaboard — the warp, the woof, and the filling of their neatly woven web were, in fact, nothing else, whatever, than unadulterated, audacious selfishness; and that selfishness, in that particular connection, was seen, more distinctly than it had previously been seen, when, a few weeks after- wards, the alms of the Continent, which had been sent for the particular relief of the sick and suffering poor of Boston, whom, it was said, the Port-Bill had Lord Sandwich. — Do not the New England Fishing-ships carry on "an illicit Trade with the French? "C'ojiMDDOEE Shi ldiiam. — Certainly ; their Ships meet at Sea; and "they supply thtm with Provisions, Rum, Stores, and the Ships them- "selves ; and return loaded with French Manufactures." — (Eeam inulion of Connundore Shuldhaiu, Governor of Xeirfouitdlaiid , before the House of Lords, March 15, 1775.) '^It will not be out of place, in this connection, to state the fact that Boston could have averted all the evils ascribed to the Boston Port-Bill, by paying for what some of her lawless inhabitants had destroyed— as property destroyed by mobs, in o»r day, must be paid for by the County in which it is destroj'ed, as .\lleghany-county, Pennsylvania, sorrowfully knows, as one of the several resulta of the notable " Pittsburg Riots" of 1877. She was evidently inclined to do so, in the beginning; but she was counselled by the Caucus of Town Committees, prompted by .loseph Warren, not to do so ; and the Committee of Correspondence at Phila- delphia subsequently urged her to pay, without success. As will be seen, in another part of this Chapter, however, the infliction of the Bos- ton Port- Bill was a pecuniary advantage to that Town ; and it is not im- jKissible that it was foreseen, at that time, that a payment for the Tea which had been destroyed by one ot her mobs, would deprive the Town of all the pecuniary advantages to be derived from a refusal to do so. What wonderful results, arising from that refusal to pay for what a mob had destroyed, have been seen, throughout the wurld, from that day to this. THE AMERICAN llEVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 191 deprived of their usual means of support, were diverted from the particuhir purposes for which they had been contributed, and employed, instead, for the particular benefit of Boston's tax-payers, in relieving them from the neces-ity of levying an unusual Poor- tax for the relief of the more than usually large number of those who were willing to live on charity ; and in " cleaning Docks, making Dykes, new laying "of old Pavements in the public streets, etc." — all of them " public concerns, of no advantage to any in- " dividual, any further than as a member of the " community to which he or she belonged. Not a " single Wharf, Dock, Dyke, or Pavement, belonging " to any individual, was ordered to be made or " repaired," notwithstanding many of those who had been really thrown out of emj)loyment could have found renumerative occupation in such works of private concern; "but only such'' were thus made or repaired " as, by the constant usage of the Town, had " always been supported at the expense of the pub- " lie " — in other words, at the expense of the tax- payers, the aristocracy of that peculiarly democratic and peculiarly . revolutionary Town. One of "the '' chief concerns of the principal inhabitants " was for those Tradesmen, whose small funds, though " sufficient for the small purjioses of life, yet would "soon be exhausted, if their resources were cutoff"" — in other words, for the payment of debts, due by those Tradesmen to those " principal Inhabitants," which, otherwise, would have been worthless — and Nails, and Ropes, and Baizes, and "Shirt-cloths," and Shoes, and other articles were manufactured, at the expense of the charitable, elsewhere, which were disposed of, by the " Gentlemen " who managed the speculation, to whom and at such j)rices as best answered the purposes ot all concerned.^ Need there be any surprise that, as one of their countrymen has since said, without a blush, " the people of Boaton, " then the most flourishing commercial Town on the "Continent, never regretted their being the principal " object of ministerial vengeance;" telling us, at the same time, that the " thousands who depended on their " daily labor for bread said : ' We shall suffer in a " ' good cause ; the righteous Being who takes care of " ' the Ravens that cry unto him, will provide for us "'and ours""?'^ Need there be any surprise, also, ' .\ paper, dated " Hoston Augu»t 20, 1774," responsive to "a report "industriously propagated in New York" — but witliout any indication by whom written or wliere published — wliicli was printed in Force's Anierimn Archiiet, Fourth Series, i., 743, 744. See, also, a Letter from Willinm Cnopi-r — the well-known Town-Clerk of Boston — U> a Geiillenian in Kew Yurk, dated " Boston : Seiilember 12, "1774," written in response to inquiries, and with the knowledge of "some of the Committee appointed to receive donations." -Bancroft's HiKloni nf the United Slates, original edition, vil., 48 ; llie same, centenary edition, iv., 332. On the thirty-fii'st of May, 1774, John Scollay wrote, from Boston, to Arthur Lee, in London, " Thousands that depend on their daily labour "for support, must be reduced to the greatest degree of distress and "want. However, they will sutler in a good Cause, and that ri;;liteous " Being who takes care of the Ravens who cry unto Him. will provide " for them and theirs." that such principles and such purposes as were thus presented to the several Colonies, found little favor, anyw'here, except among those of the assumed leaders of the unfranchised inhabitants of the City of New York, who favored revolutionary measures, and who had not been included in the recently appointed Committee of Correspondence, the Committee of Fifty-one, in that City On Tuesday evening, the seventeenth of May, Paul Revere, bearing letters from the Committee of Cor- respondence, in Boston, in which were inclosed copies of the Vote of that Town, to which reference has been made, arrived in the City of New York* — there was, also, in his saddlebags, a very interesting letter from one of the master spirits in that Town, to his corres- pondent in New York, reciting more of the motives of the Massacliusetts-men, in their construction of the Resolutions of the Town-meeting in Boston, than was told elsewhere ; ^ but there is no evidence that Revere brought anything whatever from the Caucus which had been convened in Faneuil Hall, on the preced- ing Wednesday.'"' In accordance with his instructions, Revere immediately proceeded to Philadelphia, to deliver the letters which had been addressed to the Committee of Correspondence in that City ; ' and How wonderfully similar thoughts, originated in different minds, will sometimes run in panillul grooves, far apart, as in this instance; and still more wonderful it is, when, as in this instance, the thoughts are uttered in words so wonderfully similar. ^Alexander McDougal and all those of the former revolutionary leaders who were included in that Committee, as will be seen in the course of this narrative, on the twenty-third of May, by a formal vote, concurred with their aristocratic, anti-revolutionary associates in con- demning the proposition of the Town of Boston and in offering another, in its stead ; it remained only for .lohn Lamb and those who had not been favored with seats in that body, to continue their agreement, in politii-al affairs, with the revolutionary leaders, in Boston. It will be seen, also, in the course of this narrative, that Boston was not sustained, in her unreasonable demands, b^' any of the Committees of the larger Towns and Cities, in other Colonies. <"0n Tuesday Evening, arrived here Mr. Revere, who came ICxpress "from Boston, which he left on Saturday, about 2 o'clock in the After- " noon."— (Holt's New-York Journal, l\o. 1637, New-Yohk, Thursday, May lU, 1774.) Reference is made to a letter which was written by Thomas Young, immediately after the adjournment of the Town-Meeting, May 13, and addressed to John Lamb, in the City of New York. It may be seen among the "Lamb Papers," in the Library of the New York Historical Society ; and every student of the history of that eventful period will be amply re-paid fjr whatever time he may spend in a careful perusal of it. **The Minult'sof the Committeeof Con-esjiondence, " Nkw York, Monday, " Maij 23, 1774," contain a record of the reading ot " Lettei-s from the ** Committee of Correspondence of Boston, with a Vote of the Town of " Boston, of the 13th instant, and a Letter from the Connnittee of Phil- "adelpliia ; " and, in the absence of any allusion to any other letter what- ever, there is no reaiion for supposing that anything, in luldition to those three lettei-s, was received from any other organization or person, at Bos- ton or elsewhere. " Revere was at Philadeli)hia, on the twentieth of May, when the in- habitants of that City appointed its Committee of Corresiwndence ; and, on the following day, he left that City, on his return, carrying with him, to New York and Boston, if not to other Towns and Cities on his route, copies of a Circular Letter, probably from the pen of John Dickinson, containing the response of I'hila- pointment of the Committee of Fifty-one, and of the acquiescence in that appointment of, at least, those of the previously assumed leaders of those inhabitjints who had lieen admitted to seats in that Committee. 3 Jlimiles of the ComiiiWce, (adjourned Meeting) " New York, ,Vai/ 23, "1774 ;" Holt's \>ic-York Jonntu}, No. iraf, New-Yokk, Thunxlay, May •2r>, 1774; Gaine's .Veic- 1 or*- Guztllf i)osition of New-York, to convene a Congress of the Colonies, w ithout determining which of the two it would approve, (Letter, dated us alioee stuleft,) leaving the subject undecided, until the eighteenth of June, when the Congress was deter- mined on, by a Meeting of the Citizens, without the intervention of the Committee, (Proceedinqs of the Meeting, reprinted in Force's Americaii Ar- chifes, Fourth Series, i., 420, 427.) Because the General Assemblies of the greater number of the Colonies, at that time, could not have elected Deputies to the proposed Congress, even if they had been willing to have done so — the Governor having, in each case, the power of jiroroguiug or dissolving the Assembly, which, in the greater number of instances, he would have certainly done— the action of the Town of Providence, although w ell intended, could not re- sult in the convention of a Congress ; and what was done by the Com- mittee of Correspondence in Philadelphia, was not entitled to the hon- orable mention of it, which Frothingham and othei-s have made, since it amounted to nothing, either of approval or disapproval of the New- and judicious action, the Committee of Correspond- ence, in New York, offended those of the revolu- tionary clique, in that City, who had not been invited to places and seats in that Committee, and how much the revolutionary leaders and the revolutionary popu- Y'ork proposition to convene a Congress. The honor, what there was of it, remains, therefore, with the Committee of Correspondence of New- Y^ork, as related in the te.\t, of having originated the Congress, on the twenty-third of May, with the additional honor of having established the proposition for such a Congress, in the face of and notwithstanding the determined opposition of the Massachusetts-men, in Boston, led by Samuel Adams, Joseph Warren, and their well-eulogizcd associates. The Committee of Correspondence of the Colony of Connecticut con- curred in the recommendation which the Committee in New York had made, on the fourth of June, {The Comuiitlee of Correspondence of the General Assembly of Xew York to the Committer of Cnirespondence of the Colon:/ of Connecticut, " New Yokk, June 24, 1774 ; ") the General As- sembly of Rhode Island did so, on the fifteenth of June, (Jounia! of the General Asssmbly, June lo, 1774 — Itecords of Rhode Island, vii,, 246 ;) the General Court of Massachusetts did so on the seventeenth of June, (Jour- hid iif the Home of Itepresentatities, June, 1774;) and the City of Phila- delphia, as above stated, did so on the eighteenth of June. It has suited the purposes of some to bring forward the doings of eighty-nine members of the dissolved House of Burgesses of Yirginia, assembled at the Raleigh Tavern, at Williamsburg, on the twenty sev- enth of May, as a contestant for the honors of New York, in this matter; but that Meeting was held four days after the proposition had been made in New York ; and what it did Wiis only to " recommend to the Com- " mittee of Correspondence that they communicate with the several Cor- " responding Commitlees, on the expediency of appointing Deputies from "the several Colonies of British America, to meet in a General Con- "gres.s," etc., which was done on the following day, in which, however, nothing else was done than to solicit, from each Committee, its " senti> "ments on the subject." (Proceeding' of the Meeting, reprinted in the Huston <,'cellent example. Ban- croft's Jlistory of the United ierationsof that period, the several Counties of the Colonies were regarded as entirely independent bodies, each controlling itself to the extent, even, of semling independent Delegates to the Con- tinental Congress — the centralization of authority, indeed, was the fun- damental grievance against which all the Colonies were, then, raising their remonstrances and their opposition to the measures of the Ilinne Government — and it must not be supjiosed that, in the instance referred to, in the text, the Committee sought the direct control of the masses, in any other County than in that of New Y'ork — it sought no more than tosecure the control of those, within the several Counties, who did control those masses, within their several neighlKirhoods ; and, therefore, it sought to 196 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. ments, at the second meeting of the Committee, on the evening of Monday, the thirtieth of May, Peter Van Schaack, Francis Lewis, John Jay, Alexander Mc- Dougal, and Theophilact Bache, three rigid conserva- tives and two of the revolutionary faction, were ap- pointed " a Committee to write a Circular Letter to " the Supervisors in the different Counties, acquaint- " ing them of the appointment of this Committee, and " submitting to the consideration of the Inhabitants " of the Counties whether it could not be expedient for " them to appoint persons to correspond with this " Committee upon matters relative to the purposes for " which they were appointed ; " ' and, at a Meeting es- pecially called for the purpose, on the following evening, \_Tuesday, Mmj 31,] at which thirty-five mem- bers were present, that Sub-Committee reported a Draft of a Circular Letter, for the purpose named, which was duly approved by the Committee. Mr. Lewis was ordered to cause three hundred copies of that Circular Letter to be printed ; and it was also ordered that those printed copies of the letter should be transmitted, with all convenient speed, to the Treasurers of the several Counties, with a " line " to each Treasurer, signed by the Chairman of the Com- mittee, requesting his care in the proper transmission of the several letters to the persons to whom they should be respectively addressed ; and that intimation should be given, through the various Newspapers, that such Circular Letters had been duly sent.- Of those Circular Letters, inviting a correspondence with the Committee, in New York, it is recorded that thirty copies were sent to the Treasurer of West- chester-county, with a note from the Chairman of the Committee, requesting him "to direct and forward " them to the Supervisors of the several Districts," ^ the first attempt, which was made, by any one, to draw the farmers of that County into the unrest of discontent and disaffection ; but we have failed to find, in any portion of the 3Iinutes of the Committee, the slightest evidence that any one, within that County, paid the slightest attention to the Com- mittee's insidious invitation, or that, at that time, any one to the northward of Kingsbridge, either within or without the limits of that County, seemed to possess the slightest interest in the Committee, or in the gen- eral purposes for which it had been appointed, or in those ill-concealed purposes for which it had covertly solicited the co-operation of the leaders, where there were any, throughout the Colony — certainly a very circumvent and secure the control of the entire Colony, under a mask of '■patriotism," as it had already circumvented and secured the control, in political affairs, of the County of Xew York. 1 3/iH«(es of the Committee, " NEW-TonK, May 30, 1774;" Lietiienanl- governor Colden to Governor Tryon, "New York, June 2, 1774." ^Minutes of the Committee, Special Meeting, "New-Yoek, May 31, "1774;" Lieuteiumt-govemor Colden to Governor Trgon, "Xew-Youk, "June 2, 1774." 3 Jleiiiorandum, appended to the Minutes of the Committee, "Xew- "YoKK, May 31,1774." emphatic testimony to the accuracy of what has been stated, concerning the conservatism of the farmers in Westchester-county, as lately as in the Spring and early Summer of 1774.* While the Committee of Correspondence, in New York, was thus engaged in an effort to extend its in- fluence and its authority beyond the limits of its original jurisdiction, the Committee of Correspond- ence and the leaders of the revolutionary j^opulace, in Boston, received and considered its letter responding to the Vote of that Town and to the letters which had accompanied it, to New York ; and, as might have been reasonably expected, where the difference, on such a subject, was as radical in its character and as wide in its extent as it was in that instance, there ap- peared to be very little prospect of an agreement, or even of a compromise. Indeed, the Massachusetts- men did not appear to pay the slightest attention to the proposition which those of New York had made, to call a Congress of Deputies from all the Colonies, for the consideration of all the grievances, real or imaginary, of which all the Colonies were, then, re- spectively complaining, preferring, instead, and firmly insisting on, their own proposition to remove the particular case of Boston's recognized contumacy and its consequences from all other matters of disagree- ment with the Home Government, and to enforce a relief of that Town from the penalty inflicted on it, because of its recognized lawlessness, by establishing a Non-Importation and Non-Exportation Association, throughout the entire Continent, for that especial purpose, and for no other purpose whatever. That renewed preference of the Committee of Boston was conveyed to the Committee of New York, in a letter, dated on the thirtieth of May, which, in its terms, was not creditable to the professions of those who wrote it, for either candor, or honor, or genuine patri- < It appears that a similar temper prevailed in all the Counties of the Colony, except Xew York and Suffolk. In a despatch from Lieutenant-governor Colden to the Karl of Dart- mouth, dated "Xew York, 6th July 1774," it is stated, "The present " political zeal and Frenzy is almiist entirely confined to the City of Xew " York. The People in the Counties are noways disposed to become ac- " five or bear any part in what is proposed by the citizens. I am told " all the Counties but one have decliued an Invitation sent them from " Xew York to appoint Committees of Correspondence. This Province " is everywhere, except in the City of New York, perfectly quiet and in " good order ; and in Xew York a much greater freedom of Speech pre- " vails than has done heretofore." In a letter written to Governor Trvon, dated " String Hill, Cth July. "1774," the same careful observer 8<>id, further, "Except in the city of "Xew York, the People in the Province are quite Tranquile, and have "declin'd takeing any Part with the Citizens. An Opinion is spread very " generally in tho Country that if a non-importation agreement is " form'd, Government will restrain our Exportation; a pleasure which "the Farmers clearly see will be ruinous to them." In a Despatch written to the Earl of Dartmouth, dated "New York, " 2nd .\ugust, 1774," the veneralilc Lieutenant-governor stated, '■ Great Pains has been taken in the several Counties of this Province to induce "the People to enter into Kesolves, and to send Committees to join tho "Committee in the city ; but they have only prevailed in Suffolk County, " in the Eiist End of Long Island which was settled from Connecticut, "and the Inhabitants still retain a great similarity of Manners and " Sentiments." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 197 otism ; ' and, in a letter dated on the seventh of June, the latter replied, disclaimino; the slightest approval of the proposed " suspension of Trade," to which, very singularly and without the slightest reason, the Boston Committee had attempted to commit it; and saying, concerningthat proposition. " We apprehend you have "made a mistake, for on revising our letter to you, so " far from finding a word mentioned of a 'Suspension " ' of Trade,' the idea is not even conceived. That, and " every other Kesolution, we have thought it most pru- " dent to leave for the discussion of the proposed gene- " ral Congress." It continued, in these very emphatic words : " Adhering, therefore, to that measure, as " most conducive to promote the grand system of " politics we all have in view, we have the pleasure " to acquaint you, that we shall be ready, on our part, " to meet, at any time and place that you shall think " fit to appoint, either of Deputies from the General " Assemblies or such other Deputies as shall be " choseh, not only to speak the Sentiments, but also to " pledge themselves for the Conduct of the People of " the respective Colonies they represent. "We can " undertake to assure you, in behalf of the People of " this Colony, that they will readily agree to any " measure that shall be adopted by the general Con- " gress. It will be necessary that you give a sufficient " time for the Deputies of the Colonies, as iar south- " ward as the Carolinas, to assemble, and acquaint " them, as soon as possible, with the proposed " measure of a Congress. Your letters to the south- " ward of us, we will forward, with great pleasure."^ Those of the revolutionary leaders, in Boston, who had assumed the role of a Committee of Correspond- ence, in that Town, could not long conceal from the world the reckless falsity of what they had written to the Committee in New York, when they stated to the latter that, " certainly all that can be depended upon " to yield any effectual relief" to the Town of Boston, "is, on all hands, acknowledged to be the Suspension "of Trade." The letters which were received by the Committee of that Town, in answer to the Circular Letters, which had been sent to the seaport Towns of 1 The contents of that letter and the spirit of those who wrote it can lie ascertained from tlic extracts from it which were copied into the letter, and evidently referred to in the action of those who wrote it, when, on the seventh of .June, the Committee of New York replied to that second letter from Boston. - The Resolution of the Committee in New York, on whicli that reply was based, is in these words: "Orderei>, That the Committee of Boston " he re>|uested to give this Committee the Names of the Persons who " constitute the Committee of Correspondence at Boston ; that they have " made a mistake in answering this Committee's letter, which mentioned " not a word of a Suspension of Trade, which they say we have so " wisely defined, as we leave that measure entirely to the Congress, and " we sliall readily agree to any nieaaure they shall adopt." It is very evident tliat the suspicions of the Committee of New York were aroused by the eviileut trickery of the Committee of Boston, pre- sented in its reply to the letter of the former, dated the twenty-third of May ; and that, for that reason, it desireil to learn the names of those with whom it was corres|H>uding — their characters and standing could, then, be ascertained through other means. * Copy of the letter, appended to the Miiuile* of the Vommiitee of Cor- rtipoudeiKe of Snr Yurk, " New-York, June C, 1774." Massachusetts * and to the Committees of Correspond- ence in the several Colonies, since the rece|)tion ot the Boston Port-Bill, were not, as is now well known, really as unanimous, in favor of a " Suspension ot "Trade," as the Committee had unblushingly pre- tended — indeed, with a few unimportant exceptions, the proi)osal to make Boston the only subject of con- sideration, tliroughout the Continent, and to suspend all the internal industries and, with the exception ot Smuggling, all the Commerce of all the Colonies, only for the special benefit of that one Town, regardless ot the more direct and substantial grievances which were sustained by other Towns and other Colonies, and re- gardless, also, of the very serious consequences, throughout the entire Continent and elsewhere, ot such a general and indiscriminate "Suspension ot " Trade " as had been proi)osed, and that, too, at the expense of a Congress of the Continent, which the Committee in New York had proposed and insisted on, in which all the grievances of all the Towns and Colonies could be considered, and remedies therefor be duly provided, had met with no f&\or whatever ; and the audacious leaders of the revolutionary popu- lace, in Boston, as well as the Town itself, were not slow in receding, with more agility than candor, from that high and untenable position which they had oc- cupied, in the proceedings of the Caucus held at Fan- euil-Hall, on the twelfth of May, in the proceedings of the Town of Boston, at the same place, on the fol- ^The Committees who had been sent to Salem and Marblehead, " to communicate the Sentiments of this Metropolis to the Gentlemen, "there; to consult with them; and to report at the adjournment," (Mmutfs of the Toirn-Meetiug, of Boston, Mmj 13, 1774,) did, indeed, go to those Towns, and report the results of their visits, to the Town, at its Adjoiirned Meeting, five days subsequently ; but those results were so di.«couraging to the violently disposed leaders of Boston — including Sam- uel Adams, Joseph Warren, and their associates — that they contented themselves with ostentatiously "recommending to their fellow-citizens, "Patience, Fortitude, and a firm Trust in God," without making reconl of the formal Reports of the Committees, if any such formal Reports were really made, (Minnies of the Adjourned Meetimj of the Town, Mmj 18, 1774,) and with adjourning, a second time, until the thirty-first, "by which " time it is expected we shall have encouraging News from some of the "sister Colonies," to recomi)ense them for the disappointmeut they had experienced from the results of their conferences with the Merchants ot Newburyport and Salem. The substance of the Reports from the Committees sent to the seaport Towns of the Province, all mention of which was thus suppressed by the Town-Clerk, was saved to the world, however, in a Detpatch from Gov ei nor Gat/e lolhe Enrl of Durtmoiith, dated " Boston : May 19, 1774," and laid before the Parliament, on the nineteenth of January, 177o, in which it was said the Town-Meeting "appointed Persons to go to Marblehead "and Salem, to communicate their Sentiments to the People there, and "bring them into like Measures; which Pei"S*)n3 were to make their "Report at the Adjournment, ou the Isth, when the Meeting was again ' " held, and, I am told, received little encouragement from Salem and " Marblehead, and transacted nothing of consequence." — {Partiameutarn Reijister, L, 30.) ''The first resi>onses from other Colonies which the Committee received were those, carried by Paul Revere, from Philadelphia and New York, which were anytliing else than "encouraging" to such as composed th.1t Committee ; and there can l>e very little doubt, in the light of what was done, very soon afterwards, in Connecticut and Rhode Island, that Revere carried Imck, from Hartford and Providence, tokensof what might be expected from those Colonies, al.<<), in opposition to the remarkable propositions of the Caucus of Town-Conmiittees, in Faneuil-Hall, and of the Town of Boston, on the following day. 198 HISTORY 0F WESTCHESTER COUNTY. lowing day, and in the letters from the Committee of Correspondence, covering the proceedings of the Town, which were sent to the Committee in New York, on the following Saturday, as has been, herein, already stated. The world of historical literature has been favored, in this connection, by one of the most painstaking and accurate of Massachusetts' historians, with a reve- lation of the trickery and double-dealing of at least one of those who, in the matter now under considera- tion, have been justly regarded as the leaders of the political elements, within that Colony, which were antagonistic to the Colonial and the Home Govern- ments. Samuel Adams was the Chairman and master-spirit of the Committee of Correspondence in Boston : he was the Chairman of the Caucus of the nine Town- Committees, assembled in Faneuil-Hall, which had confirmed the line of action, concerning the Boston Port-Bill, which he and the men of Boston, had al- ready contrived : he was the Moderator of the Town- Meeting, at Faneuil-Hall, continued through three days, in which that line of action was adopted and pursued and insisted on : and he inspired, if he did not personally write, those letters, describing and in- sisting on that line of action, which were sent from Boston, to the Committee in New York, in the saddle- bag of Paul Revere, of which mention has been made herein — all of them, Committees, Caucuses, Town- Meetings, and Letters, being radically in favor of the Boston plan of a " Suspension of Trade," especially for Boston's benefit, and quite as radically resisting the proposal to call " a general Congress," for general purposes. He was the Chairman and master-spirit of that local Committee of the Town which, on the thirtieth of ilay, addressed that letter to the Com- mittee of Correspondence in New York, adhering to the plan of a Non-Importation Association which Boston had previously proposed, instead of the con- vention of a federal Congress which New York had previously proposed ; and attempting, by indirect means, to commit the Committee in New York to the support of the Boston plan of Non-Imjjortation, at the expense of its own plan of calling a federal Con- gress, of which letter and insidious attempt to commit the New York Committee to the Boston scheme, men- tion has been made. Besides all these, he was the Chairman and the master sjiirit of that Committee, in Boston, which, as lately as the eighth of June, sent Circular Letters from that Town to every Town in the Commonwealth, in which it was stated that " there is " but one way that we can conceive of, to. prevent " what is to be deprecated by all good men, and ought, " by all possible means, to be prevented, viz : The " horrours that must follow an open rupture between " Great Britain and her Colonies, or, on our part, a " subjugation to absolute Slavery ; and that is by af- " fecting the Trade and Interest of Great Britain so " deeply as shall induce her to withdraw her oppres- " sive hand " ' — which the Committee proposed to do by means of an Association providing "that, hence- " forth, we will suspend all commercial intercourse " with the said Island of Great Britain, until the said " Act for blocking up the said Harbour" [0/ Boston} " be repealed, and a full restoration of our Charter " Rights be obtained."^ But we are told by that gen- erally trustworthy historian,'* that that same Samuel Adams, who was thus inspiring and leading and con- trolling the men of Boston, in their earnest opposition to a general Congress lor a general consideration of the grievances of all who were aggrieved, and who.se convictions were supposed to have been in harmony with his pretensions before the world, was really in favor of such a Congress and, consequently, really op- posed to the principles which were presented and urged by the Committees, by the Caucus, and by the Town-Meeting, all of whom he had controlled, in the Resolutions, the Letters, and the Address and Assori''- Hon of which mention has been made, all of which he is known to have inspired and some of which lie wrote; that, as early as the twenty-sixth of May, he " was about to introduce Resolves for such a Congress," into the House of Representatives, of which he was the Clerk ; and that he was prevented from doing so, only by the prorogation of the House, by the Gov- ernor. If this statement is well-founded, and the name ot its author affords a reasonable guaranty that it is so, the world of historical literature will be taught by it, how much the personal character of Samuel Adams has been unduly eulogized ; and every careful reader will also be taught by that new revelation, how much the Clerk of the House of Representatives, in Colonial Massa- chusetts, while he was only an employe of the House, presumed to dictate, in matters of legislation, during that critical period; with how much of insincerity the leader of the excited people, in that Colony, acted, in all that he said and did, before that people and in their behalf ; and, in connection with the recognized " art " and duplicity with which the leaders in New York were, also, then conducting, or endeavoring to conduct, the political affairs of the Continent, how little of real personal integrity, of unqualified unsel- fishness, and of unalloyed patriotism, really controlled or even existed among those, in Massachusetts and New York, who, sensibly or insensibly, were, at that time, conducting the Continent in open insurrection, toward a successful rebellion. The letters of disapproval and discouragement, 1 Address sent by the Boston Committee to every Town in the Province, dated "'Boston, June 8, 1774," re-printed in Force's American Archives, Fourtli Series, i., 397. - Funn of a C'wcnani, sent to every Town in j\[iissachusettt, by the Com- mittee ill Boston, with tlie above-mentioned Address, Section let. 3 Richard Frothingham of Cliarlestown, in his Uise of the Kejitiblic 0/ the I'liited States, Boston : 1872, 323, whose words are as ft>llows : "Tlie Massachusetts Assembly convened on the twenty-fifth of May. "Samuel Adams was about to introduce Resolves for a Congress when "the Assembly {26th) was adjourned by the Governor to meet in Salem "on the seventh of June." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 199 against the line of action proposed and solicited by the Town of Boston, in its formal Vote, on the thirtecntli of ^lay, of which Samuel Adams was the originator and by wliom, as the Moderator of tlie Town-Meeting, its passage had been secured, con- tinued to flow into that Town, from all directions,' carrying with them an influence, with that shrewd politician, which was more potential than all the enactments of the Parliament and all the i)0wer of the Home and the Colonial Governments had pro- duced ; and he was not slow in accepting the alterna- tive which those letters and the evident danger of a more com])lete isolation of the Town of Boston than he had supposed to have been possible, had sternly thrust upon him. Accordingly, on the seventeenth of June, the ilouse of Representatives, assembled at Salem, more or less under the guidance of its Clerk, adopted a Resolution declaring that "a Meeting of " Committees from the several Colonies on this Con- " tinent is highly expedient and necessary, to con- "sult upon the ])resent State of the Colonies and " the Miseries to which they are and must he reduced "by the operation of certain Acts of Parliament re- "specting America; and to deliberate and determine "upon wise and proper Measures to be by them " recommended to all the Colonies, for the recovery " and establishment of t^eir just Rights and Liber- " ties, civil and religious, and the restoration "of Union and Harmony between Great Britain " and the Colonies, most ardently desired by all "good Men.'' At the same time, iive persons, of whom Samuel Adams was one, " were ap- " pointed a Committee, on the part of this Province, "for the Purposes aforesaid, any three of whom to be " a Quorum, to meet such Committees or Delegates " from the other Colonies as have been or may be ap- " pointed either by their respective Houses of Bur- "gesses or Representatives, or by Conventions, or by " the Committees of Correspondence appointed by "the respective Houses of Assembly, to meet in the " City of Philadelphia, or any other Place that shall "be judged most suitable by the Committee, on the "first Day of September next ; and that the Speaker " of the House be directed, in a Letter to the Speakers " of the Houses of Burgesses or Representatives in "the several Colonies, to inform them of the snb- " stance of these Resolves." At the same time that the House of Representa- tives, at Salem, was thus adding the weight of its of- ficial judgment against the line of action proposed and solicited by the Town of Boston and in support of that proposed and insisted on by the Committee in New York, the former, also, in a duly assembled Town-Meeting, John Adams occupying the Chair, in seeming forgetfulness of its Vote, on the thirteenth of ' Dtfpalch from Goremor Gage to the Earl of Dartmouth, " Boston, 31s< "Maij, 1774," laid before Parliament, on the nineteenth of January, 1775 — {ParUamentarij Uegiftter, i., 3C.) •Journal of thv Ilovse of Rei>ref(ntatirCf, June 17, 1774. the preceding month, willingly or unwillingly, for- mally wheeled into the line of the general opposition to the Home Government, under the guidance of that foreign Committee ; and, without making the slight- est allusion to her ill-conceived and injudicious ac- tion, in her adoption of that Vote, the Town " en- " joined " the Committee of Correspondence, " forth- " with, to write to all the other Colonies, acquainting "them that we are waiting with anxious expectation "for tlie Result of a Continental Congress, whose "Meeting we impatiently desire, in whose Wisdom "and Firmness we can confide, and in whose Deter- " mination we shall cheerfully acquiesce"' — a change of policy which was, in the highest degree, remark- able, and which would be entirely unaccountable were the capabilities of Massachusetts-men, of every period, for making remarkable changes of policy and of action, whenever their material interests have seemed to call for such changes, less known to the great world in whicli we live. The Committee of Correspondence in New York having, meanwhile, received assurances of their ap- jjroval of its proposition to invite a meeting of Depu- ties from the several Colonies, in a Continental Con- gress, from the Committee of Corresiwndence of Con- necticut * aud. from that in Philadelphia^ — with the knowledge, also, that the "Standing Committee ot "Correspondence," which the General Assembly of the Colony of New York had appointed, on the twentieth of January, 1774, had also apjiroved and concurred in that proposition,'' and, undoubtedly, although in- formally,' with information of the action of the Town of Boston and of that of the House of Re[)resentatives of Massachusetts, on the same subject, — on the twenty-seventh of June, it entertained and " debated " ' Proreedinijs nf the Ailjonrned Tuwii-Meelitif/, .luno 17, 1774, reprintfil in Force's American Archivi^n, Fourth Series, i., 423. ■* The Comitiillte s in relation to so salutary n " measure." ' The Minutct of the Committee in Xew York, notwithstanding the carefully made record of the letters which were received by it, make no mention whatever of its receipt of letters from either the Town of Bos- ton or the House of Representatives of Massachusetts, on any subject, after its receipt of that, from the former, dated the thirtieth of May ; ami it may, therefore, be reasonaldy supposed that whatever knowledge the Committee then po5se<9ed, concerning the ptditical some sault of tl.e Massachusetts-iiioii, was iMioifirial nnd informal. 200 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. a Resolution, oftered by Alexander McDougal, con- cerning " which was the most eligible mode of ap- " pointing Deputies to attend the ensuing General " Congress." ^ In submitting that Resolution, which had not re- ceived the imprimatur of those who represented the majority of the Committee, and, for that reason, was not received with any favor by that majority, it is evident that Alexander McDougal acted in behalf of the minority of that bod\' — of those of its members who had been selected from the revolutionary faction of the Tradesmen, Mechanics, and Workingmen of the City — and it is evident, also, that the purpose of that minority was to secure to "the Committee of Mechanics," which, notwithstanding its formal acquiescence in the appointment of the Committee of Correspondence, continued to assume authority to represent the un- franchised portion of the people, in all which related to their political action, a right to concur in or to re- ject any nomination of Delegates to the proposed Congress, which the Committee of Correspondence should determine to make. The struggle between the two factions, within the Committee, was continued to an Adjourned Meeting of that body, on the evening of the twenty-ninth of June, when Alexander Mc- Dougal moved " that this Committee proceed, im- " mediately, to nominate five Deputies for the City "and County of New York, to represent them in a "Convention of this Colony,^ or in the general Con- "gress, to be held at Philadeli)hia, on the fir.st of "September next, if the other Counties of this Col- " ony approve of them as Deputies for the Colony; " and that their names be sent to the Committee of "Mechanics, for their concurrence ; to be proposed on " Tuesday next, to the Freeholders and Freemen of " this City and County, for their approbation." Without having reached a vote on that Resolution, however, the Committee adjourned to the following Monday evening, the fourth of July ;^ at which time, after another severe struggle, the Resolution was re- 1 Minutes of the Commillee, "New-York, June 27, 1774." It has been said, (ile Laucev's Xvtes to Jones's Histurtj of New Yorlc during the Revolutionari/ ll'ur, i., 449,) that "the Committee met to con- "eider" tliat Resolution; but tliat would indicate tlut the Resolution was submitted to the previous Jleeting, which is contradicted by the Jlfi»- tites. It is clear, as we understand the record, that Alexander McDou- gal offered it, for consideration, only at the Meeting on the twenty- seventh of June. 2 This portion of the Resolution evidently looked for the establishment of a Provincial Congress or Convention, in which should be vested su- preme and arbitrary power, without limitation, over the persons and properties and actions and thoughts and convictions of every .one within the Colony ; overthrowing all Government ; cancelling all Eights of Persons and Properties ; and establishing, in their stead, an active scoui-ging Despotism. Such an one was, soon afterwanis, established ; but, jvist at the time under consideration, the master spirits of the ma* jority of the Committee had not secured the places to which they were aspiring; and, for that reason, they were not, then, ready to concur in that revolutionary, ultra revolutionary, measure. ^Minutes of the Adjounml Jln-timj of lliv Cviiiiiiiltee, "Xew-York, June " 29, 1774." jected, by a formal vote of thirteen in support of it and twenty-four in opposition thereto. Immediately afterwards, without a division, on the motion of Theophilact Bache, seconded by John De Lancey, the Committee resolved "to nominate five persons, to " meet in a general Congress, at the time and place " which shall be agreed on by the other Colonies ; and " that the Freeholders and Freemen of the City and " County of New York be summoned to appear at a " convenient place, to approve or disapprove of such " persons, for this salutary purpose ; also, that this "Committee write Circular Letters to the Super- " visors of the several Counties, informing them what " we have done, and to request of them to send such " Delegates as they may choose, to represent them in "Congress" — a Resolution which was so general in its terms, that, in a body which was composed, ex- clusively, of those who, politically, were in opposition to the Home Government, there was no room for op- position to it, notwithstanding its silence concerning the Committee of Mechanics and the claim which had been made in its behalf;* but it was, also, one which laid the foundation for further and very important action, in which the bitterness of feeling, concerning the distribution of the proposed offices, which con- tinued to exist between the rival factions of the con- * It is proper to remind the reader, in this place, of two well-known facts, each of which had an important bearing on the political events of the period now under consideration. The first of these facts is, the ' friends of the Government " took no part whatever, in the formation of the Committee of Correspondence nor in its doings. That body was denounced by the Colonial Govern- ment, from the beginning, as '■ illegal " — "it is allowed by the Intelli- " gent among them, that these assemblies of the People without au- " thority of Government are illegal and may be dangerous," {Lieutenant - ijorernor I'niilen to the Eiirl of Ditrlmonlh, " Xew York 1st June 1774.") " These transactions " [the nomintUion of hepnties to the Congress and the propnseit rutijirntion of thi^ ticket hij the hijdij of the jjenple] "are dangerous, " my Lord, and illegal, but by what means shall Government prevent "them? An attempt by the power of the Civil Magistrate would only "show their weakness, and it ia not eaay to say upon what foundation a " military aid should be called in. Such a Measure would involve us in " Troubles which it is thought much more prudent to avoid ; and to shun " all E.vtreams while it is yet possible Things may take a favourable " tmu."—{The srime to the same, " New YoiiK, Gth July, 1774.") The party of the Government — subsequently called "Tories" — in- cluded only the members of the Colonial Government, in its various de- partments, and its dependents; it was, unwillingly, only a passive spec- tator of what, then, took place, in the political doings of that period ; and it was wholly powerless to suppress the rising spirit of Revolution, which it would have gladly done. The party of the Opposition to the Government — subsequently called "Whigs" — included the great body of the inhabitants, aristocratic as well as democratic, the patricians as well as the plebeians. It was cut up into factions, based on social and fi- nancial standings; but, in its opposition to the Government, it was united and determined. The second of the facts referred to is, at the time under consideration and during the succeeding half century, as we have already stated {vide pages i, 5, ante,) those who were not Freeholders or Freemen of a Municipality, were not vested with the right of suffrage, in any of the Colonies ; and it need not be a matter of surprise that, at that early day, the great body of the Freeholder and Freemen, in New York, was not inclined to permit any interference, in political affairs, by those who were not, legally, entitled to take part in them. Indeed, the rule of universal .suffrage is not, to-day, generally recognized ; and one State, in New England, if no more, continues to make a division of her citi- I zens, at the Polls. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 201 federated party of the Opposition, notwithstanding tiieir apparent harmony on other questions, was promptly and very energetically displayed. The Resolution offered by Theophilact Bache had no sooner been declared to have been carried, than Isaac Sears, seconded by Peter Van Brugh Living- ston, representing the minority of the Committee, of- fered another Resolution, jiroviding "that Messrs. "Isaac Low, James Duane, Philip Livingston, John " j\Iorin Scott, and Alexander ^IcDougal be nomi- '■ nated, agreeable to the question now carried ;" but it was not the intention of the aristocratic, conserva- tive majority of the Committee that the plebeian, revolutionary minority of that body should have the slightest representation in the proposed Delegation ; and, notwithstanding its seeming fairness, the Reso- lution was promptly rejected, by a vote of twelve to twenty-five. The subject was subsequently disposed of, as it then appeared, by a Resolution, offered by John De Lancey and seconded by Benjamin Booth, providing for the nomination of the Delegates by the body of the Committee, of which the conservative aristocrats held the entire control, which resulted in the nomination of Philip Livingston, John Alsop, Isaac Low, James Duane, and John Jay, of whom John Alsop and John Jay, who had been substituted for the two candidates of the minority, John Morin Scott and Alexander McDougal, by reason of their known peculiarly conservative tendencies, were espe- jiecially obnoxious to that revolutionary minority, as well as to the revolutionary portion of the unfran- chised masses whom that minority indirectly repre- sented. Another Resolution, requesting "the Inhab- " itants of this City and County to meet at the City- " Hall on Thursday, the seventh of July, at twelve " o'clock, to concur in the Nomination of the fore- " going five Persons, or to choose such others in their " stead as in their wisdom shall seem meet," was then adopted; and, the majority, probably, being well-con- tented with its api)arent success, the Committee then adjourned.' The minority of the Committee and those with whom it sympathized and acted, in political affairs — the " Bellwethers " and the " Sheep " of Gouverneur Morris's metaphor — were not inclined, however, to submit, tamely, to the arbitrary dictation of their " Shepherds," composing the majority of that body ; and they promptly determined to carry the contest into a new field, and with heavy reinforcements. For that purpose, anonymous handbills were posted throughout the City,^ on the day after the Commit- 1 Minnies o/ the t'ummillet, A<|joiirued lleetiug, "New York, July 4, "1774.' See, also, LieMtenant-goremor C'oldeu to the Earl of hnrtmonth, ** New "York, July C, 1774 ;" the same to Governor Triion, " SPBINC. Hll.1., Otli "July, 1774." - One of those handbills has been presened and may be seen, among other broadsides of that period, in the Librarj- of the Ni-w York Histori- cal Society. tee's Meeting, calling a Meeting of "the good People " of this Metropolis,'- to be held in the Fields,' on the following day, [ Wednesd 22, 23,) in whose uniupported testimony, in historical subjects, we have no confidence « halever, we prefer to lea\ e that portion of the history of "the ■' great Meeting," ifitis truly such a portion of it, where those who were present and who recorded the doings of the great assemblage then left it, entirely untold. 202 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " ony in the general Congress. But that, if the " Counties shall conceive this mode impracticable or " inexpedient, they be requested to give their appro- " bation to the Deputies who shall be chosen for this " City and County, to represent the Colony in Con- " gress ;" and it " instructed " " the City Committee of "Correspondence" "to use their utmost Endeavours " to carry these Resolutions into execution." After ordering the Resolutions to be printed in the public Newspapers of the City, and to be transmitted to the different Counties in the Colony and to the Commit- tees of Correspondence for the neighboring Colonies, the Meeting then adjourned but its great influence was continued to be felt, long after the circumstances which had caused it to be assembled had passed from the memories of those who were present and who par- ticipated in its doings. Inspired by the strength and the spirit of the Meet- ing in the Fields, and led in their o])position to the majority of the Committee, by all the old-time ex- perienced popular leaders, the " Inhabitants of the City "and County," of every class, met, agreeably to the pub- lished request of the Committee of Correspondence, at the City Hall, at noon, on the day after those Inhabit- ants had assembled in the Fields; but they did not con- firm the Committee's Nominations, for Deputies to the proposed Congress; and the utmost bad feeling, between the aristocratic majority of the Committee and the great body of the ])lebeian Tradesmen, Arti- sans, and Workingmen, whom it had betrayed, pre- vailed throughout the city.' It is not within the purjjoses of this work, however, to present a narrative of the various movements and counter-movements of the rival factions of the con- federated party of the OpjHisition, again disunited, in their determined struggle for supremacy — nominally, for the establishment of their respective principles, in opposition to or in support of a general "Siispen- "sion of Trade," but, really, for places on the ticket for Delegates to the i)r()posed Congress of the Con- tinent — which was continued, without ceasing, from the seventh until the twenty-seventh of July f and 1 Proceedht(i9 of the ^tcetiiitj^ appemted to the ^linutes of Ifw Commitfee of Comepoiidnice, " New York, July 7, 1774." See, also, Holt's Xew- York Jounial, No. IGU, Nf.w-Yokk, Thursdaj', July 7, 1774; Gaino's Kciv-Yoi-I; GnMc mid Mcrnin/, No. 1185, New- York, Monilay, .luly 11, 1774 ; Riiiiigli'HS Xetv-Yoik Gfl;p«w, No. 6.5, New-Youk, Thursclay, July 14, 1774 ; Liruteiuiut-fjoffninr Coldett to Gov- ernor Tryoii, "Spring Hill, 2n(l .\ugu6t, 1774;" Hamilton's Life of Alexander UmniUon, i , 21-23 ; Dawson's Park and Us Vicinitu, 34-.'i7 ; Dunlap's Ui»lory of XewYork, i., 453 ; Bancroft's History of the Vniled SUttes, origin.al edition, vii., 79, 80 ; the same, centenary edition, iv., 355, Siie ; de Lancey's Notes to Jones's History of Xi to York during the Revolutionary War, i., 451. 2 Minutes of the Committee. July 7, 1.3, 19, 25, and 27, 1774 ; Dunlap's Bistary of New York, i., 453 ; Ilildreth's History of the I'tiittd States, First Series, iii., 39 ; Bancroft's History of the United States, original edition, Tii., 80, 81 ; the same, centenary edition, iv., 356, 357 ; Leake's Memoir of General Lamb, d'i ; de Lancey's Notes on Jones's History of New York during the Revolutionary War, i., 451-466. 3 Decidedly the most complete narrative of that notable factional struggle may he seen in de Lancey's Note xiv, on Jones's History of New which was terminated, on the last-mentioned day, only after Philip Livingston, Isaac Low, John Alsop, and John Jay, four of the nominees of the aristocratic and conservative Committee of Correspondence, had inconsistently and venally declared, in direct con- tradiction of the constantly declared policy of that Committee, previously concurred in by themselves, that " a general Non-Importation Agreement, faith- " fully observed, would prove the most efficacious "Measure to procure a Redress of our Grievances," * which had been the peculiarly distinguishing feature in the declared policy of the revolutionary faction, in the City of New York, as well as in that of the sim- ilar faction, in Boston ; and after those four of the nominees of the Committee had thus practically abandoned their ari.stocratic and anti-revolutionary associates; withdrawn from the Committee which they had largely assisted in organizing and by whom they had been nominated; and united with those whom they personally despised and by whom they were quite as earnestly distrusted and despised — when, after the fashion of such corrupt political alliances, then and since— the way was prepared for a peaceful Elec- tion of the nominees of the Committee,* four of whom no longer represented the declared policy of the Committee; and one, if not more of the number was more of a Spy, in the service of the Colonial Government, than anything else. It will l)e seen that James Duane did not disgrace himself or his name by placing the latter, with those of his four aristocratic associates on the ticket for Delegates to the proposed Congress, on the letter through which those four bartered the little of politi- cal and personal integrity and the modicum of unsel- fish ]>rinciples which they respectively possessed, for a small mess of very thin official pottage ; and, in that instance, his backwardness was honorable and timely, since there is every reason for the belief that, at that time, he was not master of himself; that he had, al- ready, been purchased by another ; and that, then, he was, in fact, only the servant of his master. History has revealed'' what, otherwise, would have remained, concealed, in the files of the Colonial Land Papers, in the Secretary's Office, in Albany,' concern- York during the Revolutionary War, [i., 449-467,) which has been prepared with great labor, and which contains carefully-made copies of many of the original handbills and placards which were, then, scattered through- out the city. ^ Philip Livingston, John Ahop, Isaac Lore, and John Jay to Abrahitm Brasher, Theophilus Anthony, Fraucia Van Di/rk, Jeremiah Piatt, and Christopher Luyrkinch, " New York, July 26, 1774." 5 Proceedings of a Meeting of a nund/er of Citizens convened at the " House of Jl/r. Marriner," at which the nominations by the Committee of Correspondence were acquiesced in, by those who assumed to repre- sent the unfranchised inhabitants of the City, " New Y'okk, 27 July, " 1774." 8 " Duane, justly eminent as a lawyer, was embarrassed by large spec- "ulations in Vermont lands, from which he could derive uo profit, but "through the power of the Crown." — (Bancroft's History of the United States, original edition, vii., 79 ; the same, centenary edition, iv., .355.) 'New York ColonUd Manuscripts indorsed "Land Papers," in the office of the Secretary of State, at Albany, xviii., 100 ; six., 68 ; XX., 168, 169 ; THE A3IERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. ing his speculations in the Crown lands, in New York and Vermont, to secure entire success in which the countenance of the Colonial Government was needed and had been secured ; and the intimacy of his personal relations with the head of that Govern- ment, the venerable Cadwallader Golden,' and the remarkable similiarity of his views concerning the leading political questions of the day, among which the demand for a suspension of the trade of the Colonics with the Mother Country was one of the most prominent, and those, on the same questions, which were maintained by that unusually zealous servant of the King, are also well known to every careful reader of that portion of the political history of the Colony. Indeed, in the latter connection, it is known that, subsequently to his election as a Dele- gate to the Congress, and before he left New York, to take his seat in that body, as the trusted Envoy of all the inhabitants of that City, nominally charged with the great and honorable duty of seeking, in their behalf, a redress of the political grievances which had been imposed upon them by the Home Government, he visited and confidentially compared notes, on political subjects, with, if he did not also communicate information to, the official representa- tive of that Government, in New York ;- and. with that fact established, even in the absence of direct and positive testimony thereon, it would not be un- reasonable to suppose or to say that specific lines of action, in the interest of the Crown, which were sub- sequently followed, within that Congress, individually and in concert with other Delegates, were, also, con- sidered, and canvassed, and determined on, during that interview. In liarmony, also, with tliat evident connection of James Duane with the Colonial Gov- ernment, — in support, also, of the suspicion that par- ticular lines of action, in the interest of the Crown, to be taken in the Congress, were considered and deter- mined on, in advance of the meeting of the Congress, by that particular Delegate and the venerable Lieu- tenant-governor of the Colony — reference need be xxi., 1(1, 95 ; xxii., 15 ; xxxiii., 19, 41 ; xxvii., 17 ; ami the many papers, concerning Duanesbiirg, of which he was a principal Proprietor. ' He was the Clerk of the Colonial Conrt of Chancery ; he was, often, the retained Counsel of the Colonial Government {Opinions of Counsel in the Mutter <./ t'imninghum, Ajijiellnut, aguinfl Fort'y, and in the Matter of Charijes ayainut Juilije Welh ;) he was the Counsel of the Lieutenant, governor, in the celebrated Suit, in Chancery, concerning a division of the Fees of his olTicc, with the Earl of Dunuiore, (Lettei-s, etc., in the Mailer of the Atlorney-genend pro Rege ut/'iinM CnUlen ;) and the tone and the terms of the letters which passed between them, us they have been preserved in "the Colden I'npers, ' in the Library of the New York His. torical Society, leave no room for doubt on the subject. • " By my Letter of the 7th of September your Lordship would find I "entertained Hopes that the Peoi>lc of this Province would adopt niod- "erate Measures and avoid giving any new offence to the Parliament. I "know such were the sentiments of Farmers and Country People in "general who make a great Majority of the Inhabitants. I hafl a con- "fldcntial conference w ith one of the Delegates sent from this city to the "Congress now met at Philadelphia who I thought had us much intiu- "enccas any from this place, and ho gave me assurances of his disposition "being similar." — I Lienlenunt-ijoremor Coldeti to the Eic-simile of the last sheet of that AMoeiolion, which contained the signatures of the several Delegations— those of James Duane and Joseph Galloway being among them— may be seen in Force's Americuu Archifen, Fourth Series, i., opposite fiilios 91.'i, 91C. 204 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of that opportunity to obtain, for himself, a seat in tliat Congress, a contingency which the Colonial Government was, probably, quite as anxious to avoid, and one which was evidently guarded against by means which were entirely effective. James Duane was not among those who were suddenly converted, in order to ensure their success at the Polls; but, nevertheless, on the day after the disgraceful political somersault of Philip Livingston, Isaac Low, John Alsop, and John Jay had been declared satisfactory hj their jilebeian and revolutionary auditor}', that eminent adherent to the original policy of the Com- mittee of Correspondence, as well as those who had so ignominiously abandoned it, was elected, at the Polls, by the unanimous vote of "the Inhabitants," ' -affording an exam])le, in political engineering, which has been too often followed, at the expense of indi- vidual integrity and of the good of the country, from that time until the present. Perhaps the preceding detail belongs more properly to the political history of the commercial City of New York than to that of the purely agricultural County of Westchester ; yet it would be impossible to j)reseut any narrative of the events of the Revolu- tion which occurred within that portion of the Col- ony, which should pretend to completeness, or preci- sion, or accuracy, without having previously explained the precise nature of those influences which were brought, from beyond the limits of the County, to undermine the fundamental and rigid conservatism of I those staid, well-to-do, and contented farmers who occupied that County, and to draw any portion of them from the quiet of their rural homes into the .'seething vortex of partisan excitement, concern- ing measures of the Home Government which did not affect them nor their interests, in the slightest degree — a departure from the ways of their fathers, which, before many months had elapsed, transformed that quiet, and neighborly, and law-abiding community into one of entire unrest and disorder, of the most intense partisan bitterness, and of the most complete disregard of all law, human and divine; converting what had been a quiet, and well-cultivated, and pro- oses, api)arent or concealed, of those who created the Committee of Correspondence in the City of New ^ Letter of the Committee of Corregpoudeitce of Xen- York to the Cotituiit- tee in Charleston, " New York, July 26th, 1774," Postscript, dated " July " 28th ;" the same to the Committee in Philadelphia, "New York, July iSth, " 1774 ; " the same to Matthew Tilghman, Chairman of the Mnrylaml Com- mittee, " New Y'oek, July 2Sth, 1774; " Lieutenant-goremor Colden to the Earl of Dartmouth, " New York 2 August 1774;" the same to Gorenior Tri/on, " Spkino Hill 2 August 1774; " the sameto the Earlof Dartmouth, "New York 7tli Septr 1774 ; " the same to Governor Tryon, " Septr 7th *'1774;'' Jones's Histori/ of Sew York ihiring the Jifrohitionarif ^Var, i , 34, 35 ; Baucroft's Historij of the Vniled Slates, original editiou, vii , 83 ; the same, centeuary edition, iv., 358. York; the purposes, published or withheld, of the Committee itself; and the purposes, generally well- concealed, of some of those who wielded the influ- ence of that Committee, sometimes for the promotion of their individual and not always righteous interests and sometimes for the suppression of the aspirations of others which were quite as praiseworthy as their own, are, therefore, subjects which cannot be disre- garded, in whatever relates to revolutionary West- chester-county, since it was that Committee, as has been already stated, who made the first assault on the long-established conservatism of the farmers of that ancient County — an assault which was made entirely unsuccessful by their sturdy disregard ; since it was that Committee, returning to the assault and offering the tempting allurements of place and official author- ity to those who should break from the ranks of their conservative countrymen — who, as will hereinafter appear, by means of such corrupt allurements, first broke the line of those rural home-guards which had previously thrown back the power of the insidious invader; and because it was that Committee who called into existence, successively, the revolutionary Congress of the Contitient and the yet more revolu- tionary Provincial Congress, whence, subsequently, flowed that torrent of disorders and disasters over which Westchester-county has not ceased to mourn, from that period until the present. These have been consequently presented, as briefly, however, as was consistent with persjiicuity ; and a more complete, and precise, and accurate understanding of the details of the revolution of sentiments within Westchester- county, as portions of that more extended revolution, throughout the Colony and the Continent, "in the " minds and hearts of the people," it is believed, willi therefrom, be more readily and more certainly, if not more permanently, assured to the greater number of readers who shall resort to these pages. AVithout the slightest indication of any concern be- cause of the humiliating defeat to which it had been subjected, in the abandonment of one of the principal of its peculiar and emphatically declared principles, and in the acceptance, in the place of that abandoned principle, by its own nominees, of one of the pecu- liarly antagonistic principles of those whom it had persistently endeavored to silence and suppress, on the day after the election of the Delegates to the pro- posed Congress, [Julu 29,] the Committee of Cor- respondence in New York addressed a second Circu- lar Letter to the County Committee, where there was one, or to the Treasurer, where there was no Com- 2 "An History of Military Operations, from April 19, 1775, to Septem- " ber 3, 1783, is not an History of the American Revolution, any more "than the Marquis of Quincy's Mililanj History of Louijs XIV, though "much esteemed, is a History of the Keign of that Monarch. The " Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the pi-oplp, and in the " Union of the Colonies, both of which were substantially effected before " hostilities commenced." — (Letter from John Adams to Jtdidiah Slorse, " Qviscv, Xovember 29, 1815.") THE AMEKICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 205 mittee, in each of the several Counties in the Colony, in which, after it hud stated the election of Delegates to represent the City of New York, in the proposed Congress, to be assembled on the first of September ensuing, at Philadelphia, it presumptuously and with an assumed air of leadership, continued, in these words : " It therefore becomes necessary that the " Delegates to represent the other Counties in this " Province be speedily ai)pointed. The Counties will " judge of the propriety of confiding in the same per- •' sons only which we have chosen, or to appoint such " others to go, with them, to the Congress, as they " may think fit to depute, for that purpose- Permit " us to observe that the number of Delegates is imma- " terial, since those of each Province, whether more " or less, will conjointly have onlj' one vote at the " Congress. In order, however, that the representa- "tionofthe different Counties may be quite com- " plete, it is absolutely necessary that your County " appoint, with all possible speed, one or more Dele- " gates to join and go with ours to the Congress, or, if " you choose to repose your confidence in our Dele- " gates, that you signify such your determination, in " the most clear and explicit terms, by the first op- " portunity, after the sense of your County can be " known, on so interesting a subject.'' ^ To this Circular Letter which was thus sent to the several rural Counties throughout the Colony, only six of those Counties are known to have paid the slightest attention, those of Westchester, Duchess, and Albany having respectively authorized the Delegates whom the City of New York had elected, to represent them, also, in the Congress ; - while those of Kings, ' Suffolk,* and Orange,* respectively, sent Delegates of their own appointment ; and Richmond, Queens, Ul- ster, Cumberland, Gloucester, Charlotte, and Tryon, respectively, did not manifest the slightest interest in the subject.* For the purposes of this work, only the action of the County of Westchester, on that Circular Letter, can be noticed in this -place. As the Committee of Correspondence evidently in- tended that only the united action of the entire County, in every instance, should be invited, on the subject of appointing Delegates to the proposed Con- gress, it is not probable that the sentiments of the in- 1 Draft of the Circular Lttler sent to the Commiltee or Trcaiurtr of the different Counliet, " New 'YiiRK, July 20, 1774," appcuded to the ilimitetof the Commiltee, "New York, July 28, 1774." See, also, Lieutenant-governor Colden to Goveruor Tryon, " Spbinu " Hill 2 August 1774." • CyedentiaU of those Delegates — Journal of the Oongress, " Mondjiy, " September 5, 1774." ^ Credenlitil of Sinpm Boeruni — Journal of the Congress, "Saturday, "October 1, 1774." * Credential of William Ftoijd — Journal of the Congres*, " Monday, " September 5, 1774." ^Credential of Henry Wisner — Journal of the Congress, "Wednesday, "September 14, 1774, .\.5I." and tbat of John Herring— Journal of the " Congress, " Monday, September 26, 1774, A.M." ^ Lieutenanl-goremor Colden to the Earl of Dartmouth, "New York, " 7th September, 1774." dividual Towns, on any other subjects, were consid- ered desirable, or were expected to be ascertained, or, if ascertained, were desired to be given to the public. Be that as it may, for some reason, if more than four Towns in Westchester-county took any action what- ever, in response to the Circular Letter of the Com- mittee, concerning the political questions of that period, or for the appointment of Deputies to repre- sent the County in the proposed Congress, or for any other purpose, the record of that action has escaped the notice of working historical students — the pro- ceedings of Mamaroneck were communicated directly to the Committee, at New York, in a letter dated on the seventh of August ; and those of Bedford were al- so communicated, directly to the same Committee, in a letter dated on the ninth of that month : ' the pro- ceedings of Rye and those of the Borough Town of Westchester, because of the respective opinions of those Towns, on other subjects, which were more fully and formally expressed, require more particular notice. On the tenth of August, responsive to the Circular Letter Irom the Committee in New York, the Free- holders and Inhabitants of Rye, who sympathized with that Committee in its proposal that Westchester- county should appoint Delegates to represent it in the proposed Congress, met and appointed John Thomas, Junior, Esq., James Horton, Junior, Esq., Robert Bloomer, Zeno Carpenter, and Ebenezer Haviland, for " a Committee to consult and determine, with the " Committees of the other Towns and Districts within " the County," in County Convention, to be assem- bled at the Court-house, at the White Plains, on ilonday, the twenty-second of August, " upon the ex- " pediency of sending one or more Delegates to the " Congress, to be held in Philadelphia, on the first " day of September next." The Meeting appears to have patiently waited, without adjourning, while the Committee which it had appointed, organized, by the appointment of Ebenezer Haviland, as its Chairman ; and considered the great political questions of the day ; and ex- pressed its conclusions on those questions, in a series of Resolutions, in the following words: " This Meeting being greatly alarmed at the late " Proceedings of the British Parliament, in order to " raise a Revenue in America; and considering their late "most cruel, unjust, and unwarrantable Act for block- " ing up the Port of Boston, having a direct tendency to " deprive a free People of their most valuable Rights "and Privileges, an introduction to subjugate the In- " habitants of the English Colonies and to render " them Vassals to the British House of Commons : "Resolve, First, That they think it their greatest " Happiness to live under the illustrious House of "Hanover; and that they will steadfastly and uni- "formly bear true and faithful Allegiance to His ' Minutes of the Commiitee, " Sew Yokk, August 29, 1774." 206 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " Majesty, King George the Third, under the enjoy- " ment of their constitutional Eights and Privileges, "as fellow-subjects, with those of England. " Secoxd, That we conceive it a fundamental part " of the British Constitution, that no Man shall be " taxed but by his own Consent, or that of his Eepre- " sentative, in Parliament ; and as we are by no means " represented, we consider all Acts of Parliament " imposing Taxes on the Colonies, an undue ex- " ertion of Power, and subversive of one of the most " valuable Privileges of the English Constitution. " Third, That it is the Opinion of this Meeting " that the Act of Parliament for shutting up the Port " of Boston, and divesting some of the Inhabitants of ])rivate Property, is a most unparalleled, rigorous, " and unjust piece of Cruelty and Despotism. " Fourth, That unanimity and firmness of " Measures in the Colonies are the most effectual " Means to secure the invaded Rights and Privileges " of America, and to avoid the impending Ruin which " now threatens this once hai)py Country. " Fifth, That the most etfectual mode of redress- " ing our Grievances will b'e by a general Congress of " Delegates from the difl'erent Colonies ; and that we " are willing to abide by such Measures as they, in " their Wisdom, shall think most conducive upon "such an important Occasion." These Resolutions were duly submitted to the Meet- ing ; and, as the official record says, they " were " unanimously ajjproved of ; " when the assemblage quietly dispersed.' Those who are acquainted with the questionable practices of ambitious, and, not unfrequently, unscru- pulous politicians, will be prejiared, without warning, for the reception of any modification of the recorded features of that Meeting, at Rye, of which mention has been made — the first demonstration, in West- chester-county, concerning the great political ques- tions of the day, of which there is, now, any existing record. It does not appear, nor is it pretended, that the Meeting of "the Freeholders and Inhabitants of the "Township of Rye," now under consideration, was numerously attended ; and, as it was held during the busiest season of the agricultural year, there is no reason for supposing that many were present. In the same connection, it will be seen that the place of meeting is, also, unnoticed on the record. The master- spirit of the assembled farmers, whether many or few in number, was John Thomas, Junior, one of a family of officeholders under the Home and the Colonial Governments,^ and, himself, an anxious office-seeker. 1 Ollicial report of the proceedings of the Meeting— Holt's \ew-York Journal, Xo. 1G50, New-Yokk, Thursday, August 18, 1774. See, also, Gaiue's Xew-York Gazette, and the WeeMij Mercury, No. 1192, New-York, Monday, August 15, 1774, and liicmgloii's Xew-York Ga- zelleer, No. 70, New-York, Thui-sday, August 1><, 1774. 2 The Grandfather of John Thomas, Junior, waa the Rev. John Thomas, Rector of St. George's C'liurch, Hempstead, Long Island, who. from the revolutionary party ;^ and the well-con- sidered and well-worded Resolutions, as well-adapted for the protection of the father's official positions as for the construction of others for the son's advance- ment, and evidently the work of a master-hand which was not seen in the Committee nor in the Meeting, promote a suspicion that that Meeting of "the Free- " holders and Inhabitants of the Township of Rye," the first indication of Westchester-county's inclina- tion to enter the area of political strife, was nothing more nor less than a movement iu the Thomas family, and for its particular benefit. Subsequent events, in connection with the doings of those who were present, at that particular Meeting, serve to strengtlien that suspicion, if not to confirm it.* While the politicians, in Rye, were discussing, with more or less satisfaction, the result of their doings, to which reference has been made, those in the Bor- froni his Ordination, iu 1704, until his death, in 1727, was a Missionary in the employ of the Society for Propagating the Gospel in Foreign Parts, in London. The father of John Thomas, Junior, was Uon. John Thomas, who, from 1743 until the dissolution of the Colonial Govern- ment, in 1776, was a Member of the General Assembly of the Colony, representing the County of Westchester ; and, from May, 175.j, until the dissolution of the Colonial Government, in 177(5, he was the First Judge of the Colonial Court of Common Pleas for the Couuty of Westchester both of whicli otlices could have been held by no one who was not well- dispo.sed to the Colonial and Home Governments; and neither of which was surrendered by him, while he lived. The following extract from a letter from Timothy Wetniore, the Ven- erable Society's Schoolmaster at Rye, to the .-Secretary of that body, at London, dated "Rye, May 6, 17(11," affords additional evidence of the political tendencies of the Thomas family, and of its hankerings after the power to manipulate the "iwtronage" of those in authority, through- out Westchester-county : " Mr. Thomas, who is one of the Representa- "tives in this County, and who, in Governour De Lancey's time, being " favoured with all the Administration of all Offices in the Country, civil "and military, by the help of which he has procured himself a large in- "terest in the County, especially in the distant and new Settlements, " which abound with a Set of People governed more by venality than "any thing else. This Gentleman, although one of the Society's " Missionaries' Sons, is so negligent and indifferent toward Religion "(in imitation of some of our great Men) that it has been a steady "Method with him, for years, not to attend Publick Worship, perhaps " more than once or twice iu a year, whose example has been mis- "chievous. This man is not only one of our Vestry (though very " little esteemed by the true friends of the Church), but has procured "that the Majority of the Vestry are Men that will be governed by " him ; several of the Vestry are not of the Church : and not one of "them a communicant in the Church; accordingly, the Church are "not at all consulted with regard to a successor," to the former Rector, who had died in the preceding May. With the father, on the Rench, and in the Legislature, and in the interest of the Crown, and the sou in the front rank, if not the actual head, of the revolutionary element, what there was of it, within the County, it mattered very little to the Thomas family, which of the two, the Crown or the Colonists, should become the victors. 3 John Thomas, Junior, by this early movement in behalf of the rev- olutionary element, placed himself in the front rank of successful poli- ticians in AVestchester-county— he was a member of the Committee of the County, and its Chairman ; a Member of the Provincial Convention representing Westchester-county, in 177.5; a Member of the Fii-st and Second Provincial (Congresses, representing Westchester-county, in 1775, 1776 ; (iuartermaster of the Second Westchester-county Regiment, of which his brother, Thomas, was Colonel ; and Sheriff of Westchester- county, from 1778 to 1781 — his brothers, also, having beeu well provided for, in the public service. etuato the dependence of the Colo- " nies on England : and was proposed with the approbation of the loy- "ali.st Governors, Franklin of New Jersey, and C'olden of New York. "Galloway urged it in an elaborate speech; and it was supported by " Duane, .Jay, and Edward Kutledge. It was not only rejected, however, " but the menbers came at last to view it with so much odium that the " Motions in relation to it were ordered to be expunged from the Juur- " nuh. This result was an end to the loyalist intluence iu Congress." — (Erothingham's llise of the R-imhUr, Boston: 1872, 3ii7, 3i)8.) See, also, Hildreth's His'orii of the T'niled States, First Series iii., 4G; Pitkin's Histoni of the Vuited N'lfes, i., 209, 300 ; Jones's Histo>-y of Seiv Yoi k ,]»rUi'lli-er. No. 95, New-Yokk, Tlmrstlav, February 9, 177.5, reprinteil in Force's .iinericaii Archiees, Fourth Series, i., 1177, 1778 ; E.rtrnct of a tetter from lioston to a Gentle- mtiii ill Xeic-York, January 20, 1775, reprinted in the same work, i., 1178; Piiifeediiigs of llie Tom, in legal Town-Meeting, 20th February, 1773, reprinted in the same work, i., 1249 ; I'rotest of sljtii four of the In- hotiiliiiiti of the Toini, 20tli February, 1770, re printed in the same work, i., 1249, 1260. '- rroei-nlimja of the Toini, in Special Town-Meeting, :iOlh January, 1775, published in Uirimjloii's .V<-« - I'o/ i- t;iizelteer, So. 04, New-Yobk, Thursday, February 2, 1775, and reprinted in Force's .liiiencuii Aicliicen, Fourth Series, i., 1202, 120:5 ; Oinl figiieil by tireiily-niiie of the Inhtibit- imls, '• KiDGEFiELD, Connecticut, February 2, 177.')," reprinted in the same work, i., 1210 ; I'l nai'iliioje of Ailjoiinied Toini-Metliinj, .\pril 10, 1775, reprinted in Hurd's Ilislorii of Fuirjield-coimtii, Coiiiiectiait, '339 ; the same work, C50, C5:i ; Teller's Hiatori/ of Hiiliji fieht, Conn., 45, 40. PriMfi-'lings of the Toirii, in Town-Meeting, "Newtown, Connecti- '* CUT, February G, 1775," published in 2{ivingtoii'» Xew-York Gazetteer, Kg. 97, New- York, Thui-sday, February 23, 1775, re-printed in Force's Amei iaiH Archives, Fourth Series, i., 1215; Hnid' s Histori/ of Fairfield- comttij, 465. * Hurd's Hittorii of Fi.\ic.\, January 27, 1775," in llirington's iCew- Tork Gazetteer, No. 94, Xew-York, Thui-sday, February 2, 1775. 'Tard, dated " Ui-ster-coi xtv, New York, February 11, 1775," pub- lished iu Force's ./I mcrica II Archires, Fourth Series, i., 1230. U' P-iiceedings of the Committee of ftliserration of Klizaliethtoirn, Xetr Jersey. February 13, 1775, published in Holt's Neir-York Journal, No. 1676, New -York, Thursday, February 16, 1775 ; and those of the Com- mittee fur Observation fur the Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey, " WooDBRincE, February 20, 1775," published in Force's American /IrcAi'ie*, Fourth Series, i., r249, each providing for ■" boycotting " the Staten Islaudeis. Liexttenant-govenior Colden to the Eurl of bartnutiith, *' New York. "2 Nov. 1774 ; " the tame to the tame, " New York, December 7, 1774 ; " some of them by formal Votes, in legal Town-meet- ings, and all of them, in practise, also declared their disapproval of the revolutionary measures adopted by the Congress and recommended by it, to be enforced in the several Colonies. While the more conservative portions of the Colo- nists, in opposition to the Home Government, were earnestly laboring to maintain themselves in the lead- ershij) of the political elements of the Colony, and, at the same time, to secure a redress of the grievances to which the Colony had been subjected and to effect an honorable reconciliation between the Colonies and the Mother Country, the revolutionary portion of the same body of Colonists, strengthened by the accession to their number, of those, recently of the opposite portion, who were endeavoring to pose, for office-sake, both as aristocrats aud as democrats, as might best suit successive audiences, nominally intent on the ac- complishment of the same ends, was really employed in zealously promoting measures which were better adapted to the defeat of itself, in whatever it should really seek to accomplish, in the interests of peace. On the seventh of November, James Duane, who had already distinguished himself, in connection with John Jay and Joseph Galloway, as everything else than an honest promoter of anything which was rev- olutionary in its tendencies, pandered to the revolu- tionary spirit which pervaded the revolutionary por- tion of the unfranchised inhabitants of the Citj', through whose influence he had once been elevated to a seat iu the Congress and through whose contin- ued influence, only, a similar favor might be secured, in the near future — that James Duane submitted a Resolution to the Committee of Correspondence, in the City of New York, for the election, by the Free- holders and the Freemen of the City, of eight persons in each Ward, for the purpose " of observing the con- " duct of all Persons touching the Association " [of \oh- Importation, and Non-Exportation, and Xon- Consump- tion'] "entered into, by the Congress," against Great Britain and her Colonies, and for the purpose, also, of publishing the names of all those whom that Com- Ihe same to Governor Tryon, "New York, Dec. 7, 1774;" Governor fitije to "The public iimy be atwiircd. that the following letter Is tho prodtic- "tioii of a I'i'iil, iiiid nut II llctltiiiiin weaver lit WcHt ClioHter. U i» the "on'HprIng of an honcHt wai'nith in the caiiHu of h\n country ; auii tho' "hilt wnliniunlji, unii ri'maiku, appear in a lionieiipun drens, they never- "tlieh'Kii are not williuut force, and we prenunie, will contribute to Ihe "entertainment of our readeni." — (tjlilmial, iiitnitliwl'iiji !'> Iln Uller uf /;»■ Il«iev,-.) " to say a word in answer to our pretended Farmer, " and make no doubt but the lowness of stile I shall " speak in, will be excused, when it is considered that " a man may be a profound Weaver, and no gram- " mariau ; and being a useful branch of mankind as " above, ought to have the privilege of speaking in " his own stile. If so, then my first answer to our " Farmer is, that we Weavers, and I believe I may " say most of other trades too, cannot live without " meat, bread and clothing, all which I shall gladly " take in exchange for my labour ; and If I could " earn more at the year's end, than a supply for my " family, I would be content, (at this troublesome " period, which our Farmer sets up for such a terror) " to have my employer say to my creditor. / owe " the Weaver so much, which I will engage to pay to you, " when I can sell my produce. It may be my creditor " may answer, the produce will suit me, and then all " will be well ; but if not, the promise will answer at " this time, with every creditor that hath any spirit of " patriotism. Now to the uires, I would address my- " self as follows, viz. to remember when tlieir parents " were first placed in the garden, that it was said to " the woman, yea, hath God said ye shall not eat of " every tree of the garden f but the woman was pre- " vailed on by a deceiver, to disobey the command, " and to eat. But ! the consequence ! and so like- " wise, a deceiver now says to you what! are you de- " fiied the pleasure of drinking tea f But I beg of you " not to be now deceived, nor prevailed on to bring " ruin and slavery on your country and posterity, by " tasting of that detestable herb, which hath already " been the cause of so much confusion. But if you " will not be entreated, but will "persist in using it^ " you will find your case similar to that of Eve, she " lost her innocence, and plunged all her descendants " into everlasting misery ; you will lose liberty, and " plunge your descendants into everlasting slavery. " The Fanner too, complains bitterly about not " transporting sheep. I wish to God, the congress " had let us send away our black sheep; for then per- " haps this pretended Fanner, might have been trans- " ported before he could have made sucli a bleating. " Now I would beg leave to say a few words on his " clamour against our delegates. He calls them traii- " ors, which name, he had much better have taken " on himself, where it might have been applied " with propriety. I cannot see any room for this vil- " est of mankiiul, to insiuiuite, that those men would " attempt to betray their country. Besides their un- " spotted cluiracters, are they not men of extensive " interests in America? have they estate in any other " country? No, what then should induce them to " betray America, .'•eeing that if America falls, they " must fall with it? This consideration alone, is suf- " ficient to clear them from our Fanner's aspersion. " But in my opinion, a siill stronger security for their " integrity and iaitlitiil discliaige of the trust reposed " in them, is, the unblemished chtiracter they have THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 217 " ever supported; nor in this do I trust alone to " common fame, having known Mr. Jay, from his " early youth, and had some acquaintance with Mr. " Duane, from which I have had so much reason to " confide in them, that I could contentedly trust them " to contend for my liberty, or my life. And on the " whole, I think that it would be well for us farmers, " and mechanicks to consider whether it is not likely " that each colony took as much care in choosing " their delegates, as we did. That is, to send men of " knowledge, men of interest, and men of honour. If so, we must look on our farmer to be a man wholly given to ridicule, misrepresentation, and malevo- " lence ; for he hath declared that most honourable " and never to be forgotten congress, to be either a " set of ignorant men, or else to be traitors! " I would now recommend to the notice of every " reader of Rivington's Farmer, that it is the usual '' practice of evil minded persons, when they would " disturb the quiet of any man, or body of men, " against whom they can find no just cause of com- " plaint, to raise against them, without any evidence, " tlie highest clamours, suggest the most criminal de- signs, and if possible, represent even their most laudable actions in an odious light : The best char- '' acters and most commendable actions, are no secur- " ities against attacks like these of the Farmer, to " which the best of men are most exposed ; but it is a proof against them, that they are unsupported by ■ reojson, or by credible evidence ; when, if either had " existed, they would certainly have been produced "by the same malevolence that I'aised the clamour " without them. I would only desire the reader to ' consider the Farmer's clamour, invectives and abuse, calmly and dispassionately, give them their due weight and no more. I would not even desire to ■ turn them upon his own head, and cause him, like Hainan, to be hanged on his own gallows — I only '' desire that, unjust and unreasonable as they arc, '■ they may have no weight with the reader, or raise any prejudice in his mind against the cause of truth iS: his country, or against Any man or body of men, especially those worthy men who have nobly stood " forth and exerted themselves to save their country " from slavery and destruction. " I come now to consider his clamour against the citizens, in which he declares, at a certain time, " there was no magistrate with virtue enough to do liis duty ; and that there is no merchant he would I rust. I don't recollect any thing said of the law- yers, but he hath been severe upon the mayor and ' onimonalty, on account of the snipe act, with uhich act, il he had gone a little further, he would amply have justified our struggle, with the mother " lOUMtry. " I would ask, why does not that act continue in " force to this day? " The answer is, because the country pc()j)le were very unaninuius in opposition to it; though it was " to the loss of individuals, myself for one, still they " stood out ; which caused the framers of that act to " consider closely the consequences which would at- " tend its continuance — and so it was thought best to " make it void. Here we may see the effect of a " steady opposition to an odious law ; and similar " causes will produce similar effects. We may assure " ourselves that a steady and firm opposition to the " late acts of Parliament, will cause our sovereign to " examine into the state of the case with great atten- " tion ; and when he finds he has been led into un- " warrantable acts by diabolical counsellors, he will " dismiss them from their offices, by w'hich they have " wickedly devised to throw the nation all into con- " fusion, and thereby to dethrone the King. " Therefore my fellow mortals, let me beseech you, " as you value your liberty, and the liberty of your " posterity, take the advice of the ever to be admired " and revered Congress, stick close to the non-con- " sumption agreement, and lay aside those unneces- '■' sary diversions, which but too often end in the de- " struction of both soul and body. If it should seem " grievous for the present, we have this for our con- " solation, that as good men as you and I, have been " afflicted : The devil was permitted to afflict Job " worse than wicked Ministers, or Counsellors of " state can you and me ; and let us take pateru by " his stability, when liis friends came and clamoured " against him, as bad as our Farmer doth in this day, " against the best men we have among us ; and when " his wife advised him to curse God and die, what was " the effect? why nothing at all, for it was full conso- " lation for him to say, I know that vuj redeemer liv- " eth; and in another place, all the days of mij ap- " pointed time icill I wait, till my change come. " This is an amiable example of stability, which, " may Americans imitate. May they join corre- " sponding actions to fervent prayei-s, that they may be " enabled to maintain their rights and liberties I That " the British arms may never be employed but in a " just cause, — to i)rotect the weak and innocent from " wrong, and to be the terror of oppressors and evil " doers. That the illustrious house of Hanover may " continue to be the defenders of true religion and " virtue, the faithful guardians of our freedom and " i)roperty ! That our sovereign, George the third, " may discover every wicked design, that any of his " Ministers, or others, have conceived against him, or " any of his people! That he may be endowed with " wisdom ami virtue to oeconie a blessing to his peo- " pie, and a terror only to his enemies ! Tiiat his " days may l)e prosperous and many, and his end " peaceful and hapi)y ! And nuiy all the subjects of " him and his succes.sors, be ever watchful and reso- " lute to prevent the least encroachment upon their " rights ami liberties, on tiie preservation of which, " tile hapi>iness of l>otii King and people depends! '• And as a powerful means of i>reserving tiie bless- " ings of freedom, nniy we be all duly sensible of the 218 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " importance of choosing proper persons to represent " us in our legislative assembly, and of being ex- " tremely careful in our choice. — All which are the " fervent wishes of A Weaver, in Harrison's Pur- " chase. West Chester County." About the same time that this letter appeared, there was a movement, in the vicinity of the White Plains, to obtain a nominal approval, if no more, of the action, the revolutionary action, of the Committee of the City of New York ; but if what was said of the result of the effort by those who were opposed to the movement, without contradiction, may be believed, only " three or four persons in the White Plains " participated in it; and, practically, it was a failure. Very soon after the end of the movement referred to, however, there was a counter-movement, in the same vicinity, in which a Declaration was circulated and signed by the Freeholders and principal Inhabit- ants, in which the conservatism of those who signed it was distinctly asserted. As a part of the earlier literature of the Revolution, in Westchester-county, we have thought that Declaration possesses sufficient of interest to entitle it to a place in this narrative. It was in these words, very carefully copied from the original publication, in Rivington's Xew-York Gazet- teer, No. 91, Nem'-York, Thursday, January 12, 1775 : "To the PRINTER. "Sir, "TTTE the subscribers, freeholders and inhabit- VV " ants in the White Plains, in the county " of Westchester, think it our duty to our King and "country, to declare, that we have never given our " consent to any Resolves touching the disputes with " the mother country, nor are we any ways concerned " in any measures entered into relative to them. We " are rather induced to do this, because we under- " stand, that three or four persons in the White "Plains, have taken \\\im\ them to declare to the "Committee at New-York, the consent of the "inhabitants of the White Plains to the resolutions " entered into, in New-York, and their acquiescence " with the measures taken there ; when the major " part of the few people who attended the meeting, " did not choose to be concerned in the matter. We " also testify our disaT)probation of many hot and "furious proceedings against the measures taken by "the mother country, as, in our opinion, they will " rather tend to ruin this once happy continent, than " remove grievances. We also declare that we desire "to live and die peaceable subjects to our gracious "Sovereign King GEORGE the Third and his laws. " This is to inform the public, that the above declara- "tion was signed by forty-five freeholders and in- " habitants, in the small precinct of the White " Plains, against the proceedings of the New-York " Committee, besides Miles Oakley." A few weeks afterwards, Miles Oakley, one of those who had signed it, undoubtedly, for good and sufficient reasons,' retracted what he had uttered in the above- recited Declaration ; and we have carefully copied from Holt's New-York Journal, No. 1681, New- York, Thursday, March 23, 1775, what he said on that latter occasion. It was in these words : " Westchester County, White Plains. "TTTHEREAS, there was a petition published in YV "Rivington's paper, some time past, that "forty five of the freeholders and inhabitants, be- " sides Miles Oakley, did sign a petition — I did sign " a petition, something like it, by being misled ; and " afterwards being informed into the right state of "the matter, I got the petition, and struck my name "out, and forwarned the Esq. A. H — not to return "my name and he swore by God he would; and "many others that signed it, has told me, they was " sorry they had any concern in signing the petition. " MILES OAKLEY, and " DANIEL HORTON." There was no portion of the County of West- chester, in which the conservatism of the inhabitants was so general and so decided in its character, as in the Manor of Cortlandt ; '- and. during the Winter 1 On tlie Sth of3Iay, 1775, 3Iiles Oakley was appointed a member of the County Committee, (mi'c ;«(sl;)man afterwards, he received a Warrant for Second Lieutenant in Captain Mills's Company ; (i i ; leaving the service, when the Campaign closed.— (J/i.>V«W Iit^»t>lulion of iIk lliiiisr of Rejirrfriiliilires of MiiuachumtlM, inviting u Meeting of Deputies, in a Cungiera of the Continent, June 17, 1774. 224 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. ciliation between the Colonies and the Mother Coun- try might be effected ; but it also maintained, in op- position to the minority of the House and more con- sistently with the uniform profession of loyalty to the Sovereign and of respect for the fundamental principles of the Constitution, in both of which all, the minority as well as the majority, professed to be in harmony, that a removal of the causes of the dis- affection and a restoration of harmony between the excited disputants could not be secured by the use of such means as the Congress had recommended and authorized, no matter bj' whom organized and con- trolled ; and that, for those well-defined purposes, it would be preferable to adopt and employ only those means which would give offence to no one, and only those instrumentalities concerning which there could not be raised any question of their legitimacy nor of their entire fitness, within the law, for the due promo- tion of the great ends for which, alone, all professed to be contending. The fii-st-named portion of the mem- bers, was, evidently, determined to force the Assembly into the line of the radical portion of the party of the Opposition, for no ofher purpose, however, than that of increasing the moral weight of that particular fac- tion of the party, in its desperate struggle for the possession of the controlling power, in political affairs, within the Colony ; and this, too, notwithstanding that success in such determined effort could only re- sult in destroying the one remaining body, legally constituted and entirely unsmirched by any associa- tion with any less legally constituted body, through which the Home Government could be reached, offi- cially, in whatever action should be taken in behalf of " the common cause ;" ' and notwithstanding, also, that the supporters of the Congress, in the event of their success, would, thereby, destroy a most powerfiil instrumentality, then preparing to labor, independ- ently, in a line which whilst parallel to that already occupied by the Congress itself, was, nevertheless, for the accomplishment of the great purposes for secur- ing which that Congress had been originally proposed and was subsequently organized, and was, then, among other less desirable purjjoses, through its own appointed instrumentalities, apparently laboring. The last-named portion of the members, not less deter- mined than the other, resolutely maintained that the Assembly should remain entirely independent from all those popular Committees and Congresses which had been moving and laboring, during the preceding year, in lines of action which they had respectively approved, each for itself, for the common purposes ; 1 " The Ministry alledged that the Congreas was no legal body, and " none could be heard in reference to their proceedings, without giving " that illegal body Bome degree of countenance ; that tliey could only *' hear the Colonies through their legal Assemblies and tlieir Agents prop- " erly authorized by them, and properly admitted here ; that to do " otherwise would lead to inextricable confusion and destroy the whole ■' order of Colony Government." — (Aiiminl lligislfr fur the yearVilb, 56.) See, also, Pnrliuniftitnry UrgisUr {.\lmon's) i., 115, IIG, 124. and, with equal resolution and consistency, it evi- dently determined, also, that the Assembly should take no official action on any of the occurrences of the preceding year, except such as should be brought before it, officially, or such as might have arisen from some prior action of the Assembly itself ; and, more important than all else, it determined that, with all the weight of its legitimate and official authority and influence and with all the personal influence of its individual members, but after a fashion and in terms of its own selection, and without any violation of offi- cial or individual propriety or of the Laws of the Land--especially without officially recognizing the existence of any other opposition to the Ministry or the existence of any other organized body which had been, which was, or which might become, similarly employed — it would vigorously oppose the obnoxious Colonial policy of the Home Government, earnestly seek a redress of the serious grievances under which the Colonies were then laboring, and honestly en- deavor to effect that honorable and permanent recon- ciliation of the Colonies and the Mother Country, which all factions, and all parties, and all sects, and all classes of society, throughout the Colony, professed to consider necessary and desirable; and which, some in one manner and some in others, each faction for itself, they were endeavoring to secure, for the common weal.'^ The County of Westchester was ably represented on the floor of the Assembly, in the persons of Col- onel Frederic Philipse and Judge John Thomas, who represented the body of the County ; Pierre Van Cortlandt, who represented the Manor of Cortlandt; and Isaac Wilkius, who represented the Borough of Westchester. Of these, Thomas and Van Cortlandt were of the minority of the Assembly, of which mention has been made ; and Philipse and Wilkins 2There is no subject connected with the history of the I'nited States which, from the beginning until now, has been more systematically and recklessly falsified than the political character of the members of that Assembly, the influences which controlled that body, and the action which it tiiok, on the great political questions of the day. Xotw ithstanding there was not a member of the party of the Govern- ment in the .\ssembly, Murray {Impiirtiul HMonj, i., 434) Lossing (Field Bonk, ii., 793) and, with his characteristic indirectness and malignity Bancroft nflhf I'niled Sittles, original edition, iv.,2(IS. 209, iln, 211, 212, etc. ; the same, centenary edition, iv., 455, 4.56, 457, etc.) stated or insinuated that the "friends of the Government," or " the Tories," were in the ascendency and controlled it. Notwithstanding the Despatches of Lieutenant-governor Colden to the Home Government, which are (and have been, since 1775) accessible to everybody, abundantly prove that the Colonial Government possessed no more influence, which it could exercise over the .\ssembly, than was pos- sessed by any other political opponent. — that, in fact, that b(«ly was not in harmony w ith the Government, and acted adversely to the hopes of the. Government — Murray, (Imparliiit Jlislory, HMorff of Cii il U'ur in AmmcH, Dublin: 1779, i., 68 ; Soule, {HMoiie des TioiihUs, i., 129 etc., assert that whatever action was taken by the House, was uuder the influence of the Lieutenant-governor of the Colony. The action, on the great questions of the day, which the .\s5embly took, from day to day, tells its own story, wherever it is known, and stamps the brand of infidelity to their duties, as historians, on by far the greater number of those who have undertaken to discharge those duties, oa these particular subjects. THE AMERICAN KE\'OLUTION, 1774-1783. 225 were of the majority of that body, which has been already described ; and because of the prominent jiarts which those Representatives of that County respectively took, in the debates concerning the momentous questions which were considered and determined in that Assembly, and because of the ills which befell three of those Representatives, because of what they had respectively said and done in that Assembly, there is no portion of the history of rev- olutionary New York which possesses a deeper inter- est to those who are of the Westchester-county of more recent days, than that which relates to the action taken by that General Assembly of the Colony of New York, on the political grievances under which the Colony was then said to have been laboring, on the Colonial policy of the Home Government through which those alleged grievances had been inflicted on the Colonies, on the means which were best adapted to the redress of those alleged grievances, and on its employment of those means for that purpose. Although the Assembly had been prorogued to meet on the tenth of January, 1775, the members from the distant Counties were not present on that day, nor on several succeeding days; and, on the twentieth of that month, a "Call of the House" was ordered to be made on the seventh of February ensu- ing ; and the Clerk of the House was ordered to write to the absent Members, to require their punctual attendance on that day,' both factions of the House evidently understanding tl>at that particular " Call of " the House " carried with it, in honor if in nothing else, the additional provision that no leading ([ucstion which was likely to be brought before the Assembly, during that Session, should be thus introduced, until after that " Call " should have been made, agreeably to that Order.- It appears, however, that the minority was strengthened by the arrival of two of the absen- tees, wiihin a few days after the " Call " had been ordered and nearly a fortnight before the day on which it was ordered to be made — at which time, too, it appeared to the minority that it had temporarily acquired the control of the House — and the majority was surprised, on the twenty-sixth of January, by 1 Journal of the Hoiue, " Die Veneris, 10 ho., A.M., the 2Uth Janaary, " 1775." 3 " It was some Days before a sufficient numtier of Members got to Town to make u House, and there nre still twelve of their number absent, " which has occasiuued the House to put off tlie farther consideration of " their IniiH^i taut Husiness to the 7th of next Mouth, at w hich Time **they have ordered all their Members to attend." — (LieuttMumt-gurerttor tWifen li> Hie Riih,/ Diirliiiuiilh, " Xew York, 21 .January, 177.)." ) In the Lieutenant-governor's Ues(>at<'h to the Eiirl of Dartmouth, dated on the first of February, 1775, it is stated that the Call of the House referred to was made on a Motion offered by the minority of the House, for what was supposed would be beneficial to its purposes ; and when it is remembered that the majority already pos»i'SS«'d the cimtrol of what- ever was brought forward, it will be seen that that majority not only had no occasion to make such a Call, but. also, that, when it consented that such a '* Call " should be made, it had entire confidence in its con- tinued supremacy, even when the entire strength of each of the two fac- tions should have been brought into the House, an instance of its temer- ity which, very nearly, became disastrous to it. 15 the introduction of a Resolution, submitted by Col- onel Abraham Ten Rroeck, of the Manor of Rens- selaerwyck, to "take into consideration the Proceed- " ings of the Continental Congress, held in the City " of Philadelphia, in the Months of September and " October last." Under any circumstances and in any assemblage, there would be aroused an earnest, if not an angry, opposition to any movement which was covered with as much of bad faith and dishonor as was seen, sur- rounding the Resolution which Colonel Ten Broeck had thus submitted in violation of the honorable understanding, between the two fiictions, which had been entered into when the "Call of the House " was agreed to, by both ; and, in the instance under con- sideration, " a warm debate ensued," between the rival factions of the Assembly, which was followed by a call " for the Previous Question," submitted by Colonel Philipse, of the County of AVestchester, on which, agreeably to the parliamentary usage of that period, the House was carried from the consideration of the Resolution which was then before it, to the consideration of that "previous question," whether the question on the original Resolution should then be taken, in other words, if that original Resolution should not, then and there, be absolutely rejected, without being permitted to linger until another day, in the hands of an adverse majority. By a vote of ten to eleven, the House determined that the question on Colonel Ten Broeck's ill-timed Resolution should not " be now put," thereby entirely defeating the minority, in its certainly dishonorable attempt to force a consideration of the proceedings of the Con- gress, on the Assembly, in open violation of its own particular undertaking, and at the expense of its own honor.' Very reasonably, although the welcome act wsis done by those who were not of the " friends of the "Government," the result of that early struggle in the General Assembly of the Colony, on such a momen- tous question, was very acceptable to the Colonial Government* as well as to the Ministry, at London and, from that date until thi.-*, .separated from the mo- tives of the majority of the Assembly who had thus rejected the Resolution, and from the other acts of the series, in opposition to the Government, of which 3 Journal of llie Uotue, "DieJovis, 10 ho., A.M., the 26th January, " 1775 ; " Limlennnl-gorenior Colilen to General Gaije, " Xew York 2"Jth " Jany 1773 ; " Hie mme In Hie hjirl of bnrtiiiunth, " Xew Y'ork 1st Feby "1775;" the mime fn tinreriiitr Tniini^ "Xew Y'ork, Ist Feby, 1775 ;" the *' mine to .Ulinintt tiriiven, "Xew Yohk 2Mth Feb, 1775." < The venerable Lieutenant-governor of the Province was evidently in excellent spirits, from that result, when he w rote the Di^sjiatches to Gen- eral G ige and the Karl of Dartmouth, which were referred to in the last preceding Xote. 5 " When the question to adopt the Sleasures recommended by the Con- " gress was negatived by a Majority of one only, in this Assembly nf "twenty-six Individuals, the Ministers were in high spirits; and these '• Individuals were then repre.'sented iw 'all .Vnierica.' " — (Governi^r .Toho- stoue's Si>errli in Hie U'lWe'f Coiiiniuiiii, May 15, 1775 — .\lmon's I'urlimntM- ttiry tieguter^ i., 47;j.) 226 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. that rejection of Colonel Ten Broeck's Resolution was only the prelude, that Vote of the Assem- bly has supplied a theme on which those who have seemed to play the part of historians of that portion of America's history, have based much of what they have said, unduly commendatory of Massachusetts and Virginia and quite as unduly denunciatory of everything which pertained to New York, unless of some of the men of New York, of that early period, whose characters, for fidelity to the truth and tiprightness in the discharge of public duties, were no better than their own. ' The lesson which the defeat of its dishonorable movement, under Colonel Ten Broeck, had given to 1 Gordon (HMnryof Americnn RerohitMii, i., 471) led off, in the work of detraction, by saying " The Massacluisetts Congress were displeased with "the proceedings of tlie General Assemlily of New York," for this Vote, among others, as if the approval of any merely insurrectionary body were necessary to ensure th^ respectability, in history, of any General Assembly, legally elected, legally convened, and acting in conformity with law. Ramsay {Hv^torij of the Americnn Ih-vvhifu'tt, i., 14.3) insinua- ted, in the absence of s\ifficient authority to assert, that " the party for " Koyal GovernuuMit," — although there was not a member of that party witliin tbe -Assembly, and although the Colonial Government was con- fes.sedly without influence enough to be made acquainted with its inten- tions — led the Assembly to reject the Resolution. Grahame (History of the Viiiled .Slates, iv., 3Gi)) following Ramsey, and, generally, in his iin- creilited words, repeated the slander w hich that early writer insinuated. Leake (Memoir of General I.ninb, 97) regarded the Vote as unpatriotic and " an important ministerial triumph.'' Lossing (Field Book of the Rev- olittioii, ii., 79:i) made "fifteen of the twenty-four Members of the As- " sembly. Loyalists ; " and he attributed the Vote to that unduly assumed cause, although, in fact, every member professed to have been equally loyal to the Sovereign. Bancroft, also, as far as his fragmentary para- graphs may be regarded as history (HUtory of the Vnited States^ original edition, iv., 207-21U ; the same, centenary edition, iv., 454-4.511) insinu- ated what he.would have been glad to have asserted, had he possessed even a shadow of evidence to support him, that it was the influence of the Government and that of the Established Church, the venality of the Representatives in the .\ssembly, the timidity of the Colonists themselves, and prejudice against lawyei-s and Presbyterians, combined, which pro- duced that notable Vote. The servility of the Assembly to the Minis- try, singularly enough, produced it, if the acute and untrustworthy John C. Hamilton (HMory of the Hepnblu;, i., 7!)), is to be believed. Lodge (UiMory of the Knijlit^h Cobmies, 491,) one of the latest specimens of Miissa- chusetts dilettanteism, sneeringly refei-s to the Assembly of New York as "the close corporation known as the .Assembly," as if the General Court of Massachusetts, locked in its Chamber, was notquiteas "close" a body, while it was in session, aseven he could find. Others, including Krothingham (Itise of the Reimblic, 39S) to'd only of the rejection of Col- onel Ten Broeck's Resolution, and, by the suppression of much of the truth concerning the subject, left their less informed readers to infer, if the latter are not directly told so, that the Assembly was influenced, in that action, by an antagonism to the popular cause. No one, unacquainted with tbe facts and depending on any of the above-named historians for information, can jiossibly learn, from them, that the Vote refeixed to was taken in the interest of the common cause, as a prelude to what the Assembly intended to do, in its own manner, in support of that cause ; that there was not a " friend of the Government," or " Tory," or member of the " party of the Government," among the members of that Assembly ; that the Colonial Government was not con- sulted, respecting anything which was done, or to be done, by that As- sembly ; and that not even the Congress of the Continent, as will be seen hereafter, more earnestly, n>ore powerfully, or more successfully opposed the Jlinistry and demanded a redress of the grievances of the Colonies, than that Assembly, in every thing which it did, on those subjects. Pit- kin (HMory of the Vnited States, i.. .324, 32.5,) and Hildreth (History of the Vnited Stales, First Series, iii., 56,) notwithstanding they were New Eng- landers, did not permit the truth to be suppressed ; but they gave to the Assembly of New York, at least a portion of what was due to it, in honestly written history. the minority of the Assembly, appears to have been well-studied b}' those who were of that minority ; but it did not prevent it from continuing to hanker after the leadership of whatever movement, in the direc- I tion of a redress of the grievances of the Colonies, the j Assembly should be inclined to take. Subsequent events very clearly indicated, indeed, that the mi- nority desired to promote its own factional interests rather than to serve the Colony ; and, undoubtedly with that end in view, five days after the defeat of its first ill-timed movement, and apparently actuated only by purely patriotic motives, Peter R. Living- ston, of the Manor of Livingston, one of the leaders of the minority, offered a Resolution "that a day "maybe appointed to take the state of this Colony ''into consideration ; to enter such Resolutions as the "House may agree to, on their Journals; and, in " consequence of such Resolutions, to prepare a hum- " ble, firm, dutiful, and loyal Petition to our most gra- " cious Sovereign." Whatever may liave been the pur- poses of the minority, in submitting that Resolution, however, it certainly gathered no special advantages I to itself, in doing so, since the majority promptly ac- cepted a proposition which was perfectly agreeable to it, and added importance to it, per se, by uniting with the minority in support of it, all the members who were present, the conservative as well as the radical, uniting in the unanimous adoption of it.^ Immediately after the adoption of the Resolution I submitted by the Representative of the Living- ston Manor, James De Lancey, of the City of New York, one of the leaders of the majority i and the head of that powerful family, moved "that a Memorial to the Lords, and a Representation 1 " and Remonstrance to the Commons of Great Brit- I " ain may be prepared, together with the Petition "to his Majesty;"^ and, like the Resolution which -Jouninl of the Hmise, " Die Martis, 10 ho., A.M., the 31st January, '1775." 3 The peculiar force, if not the peculiar assertion of the pohtical standing of the General .Assembly, with which the proposed papers w ere j vested, in the words of the Resolution, was noticed, in the Parliament, and used as one of the reasons for the Parliament's rejection of them — in the Hotise of Lords, it was said, "the title of the paper rendered it " inadmissible. It was called ' a Memorial: ' now, ' Memorials ' are pre- " sented from one crowned head to another ; but as to a ' Memorial ' from an American Assembly, it was unheard of, and ought not to be read.'" ! In the same debate, it was said, also, by another Peer, that " the title " given to the paper was suspicious : a * Petition ' from the same Assem- "bly had been presented (o the King, the Colonies not denying the "supreme Rights of His Majesty ; a ' Hemonstrance' to the Commons; " and, now, a ' Memorial ' to the Lords. They dropped the usual word " ' Petition,' lest, from that, it should be imagined that they acknowl- " edged the supreme power of those branches of the Legislature." — (Speeches of the Earl of Denbigh and Rirl Goiter, in the Honse of Lords, May 18, 177.5.) In the House of Commons, Mr. Jenkinson, in opposition to receiving the paper addressed to that House, " urged that the House had never re- " ceived Petitions of this nature : that, here, the name of a Petition was "studiously avoided, lest anything like an obedience to Parliament •' should be acknowledged. The opposition of the Colonies was not so "much against the tax which gave rise to the present dispute, as to the " whole legislative authority of Parliament, and to any restrictions of THK AMEIUCAN KE VOLUTION, 1774-1783. 227 li:id immediately preceded it, that Resolution, also, received the afiirmative vote of every member of the House who was then present. * Continuing the commendable work in which it had thus commenced the proceedings of the day, and ap- parently without any dissent from any one, the House then ordered that James De Laiicey, and Benjamin ; Kissani, of the City of Now York, Colonel Philip Schuyler, of Albany-county, George Clinton, of Ul- ster-county, Dirk Brinkerhoof, of Duchess-county, Samuel Gale, of Orange-county, Isaac Wilkins, of the Borough of Westchester, Crean Brush, of Cumber- land-county [now a part of Temow/], Christopher Billop, of Richmond-county, John Kapelje, of Kings-county, and William Nicoll, of Queens- county, or the major part of them — all, except Philip Schuyler and George Clinton being of the majority of the House — be " a Committee to prepare a State' of the Grievances of this Colony, and report same to this " House, with all convenient speed, after the Call thereof, to be had on the seventh of February " next." ' Having thus indicated what the House proposed to do, in the common cause in which the body of the Colonists was so earnestly engaged, the House was then adjourned. Time, very often, produces marvellous changes in the tempers and purposes of politicians, especially in those of politicians who are not of the controlling majority, in their own party or in the State; and, very often, the actions of those politicians, when the latter are engaged in a personal, or factional, or par- tisan struggle, cannot be brought within the provisions of any known rule of action, of any class. No reas- onable reason which would be honorable to the minority of the Assembly, therefore, can be given for the eagerness which it displayed, on the sixteenth of February, to disturb the harmony of that body, in j which all of both factions appeared to have been i united in both purpose and action ; but, on that day, | Colonel Philip Schuyler, of Albany-county, in behalf j of that minority, renewed the conflict of factions | which had been opened, unsuccessfully, by Colonel I Abraham Ten Broeck, of the Manor of Rensselaers- wyck, on the preceding twenty-sixth of January. For that unseemly purpose, that distinguished niem- " their trade." — {Speech of Mr. Jeiikimon, in the Hmite of Commont, May 1.5, 1775.— .Mnion's I'nrliiiini-iilani Rrgiiler, i., 470.) Besiilfs the peculiarity of the titles of tliose several papers, to which reference has been maile there was a grave signifiainie in the fact that they were moved for, with those titles, by the head of the leading fam- ily in the Colony ; and that they were ordered by an iinanimons vote of the Assembly. It has suited those who have prefeiTed to traduce New York and her General .\ssembly, however, to regard both the (ieueral Assembly and its paiiers as only favorable to the Home GoTemment and | antagonistic to the common causi". 1 Jouruat of the " Die Martis, 10 ho., .\.M., the 31st January, " 177.5." - In the language of that pericxi. the word •' State," as it was used in this and similar connections, was the equivalent of the word "State- " nient," which, in such connections, is now employed. ftlie Houfe, "Die Martis, In ho., A.M., the :Ust .lanuary, ■ «' 1775." I ber of the minority, on the day referred to, moved that certain specified letters, written by the Assem- bly's Committee of Correspondence, during the recess of the House, and urging the convention of a Con- gress of the Continent for the consideration of the grievances of the Colonies,^ should be entered on the Juurnuh of the Ilouxe, and copies of them be sent to the new.s])apers, for publication; and, of course, " debates arose upon the said Jlotion," which was followed by the emphatic rejection of it, by a • vote of nine, in the affirmative, against sixteen, in the negative — Judge Thomas and Pierre Van Cort- landt, of course, being among the former, and Colonel Philipse and Isaac Wilkins, of course, among the lat- tor.= On the following day, [February 17], Colonel Nathaniel Woodhull, of Suffolk-county, akso a prom- inent member of the minority, continued the faction- al strife, by offering a Resolution of Thanks to those gentlemen who had represented this Colony in the recent Congress, " for their faithful and judicious dis- " charge of the trust reposed in them, by the good " people of this Colony ; " and, of course, " debates "arose upon the said Motion;" after which, by a vote of nine, in the afiirmative, against fifteen, in the negative, it was rejected — Judge Thomas being among the former, and Colonel Philipse and Isaac Wilkins being among the latter." On the twenty -first of February, Peter R. Living- ston, of the Manor of Livingston, continued the struggle of the minority, by offering a Resolution giving "the Thanks of this House to the Merchants " and Inhabitants of this City and Colony, for their " repeated, disinterested, publick-spirited, and patri- " otic Conduct, in declining the Importation or Re- " ceiving of Goods from Great Britain, and for their " firm Adherence to the dissociation entered into and " recommended by the Grand Continental Congress, " held at Philadelphia, in the Months of September "and October last, and that Mr. Speaker signify the " same to the President of the Chamber of Commerce " in this City, at their next Meeting, and order a copy " of the same to be published in the public Prints." Like the other Res)lutions of the series, which had preceded it, this peculiarly inappropriate Resolution, before such a deliberative body, after it had been amply discussed, was promptly rejected by a vote of ten, in the affirmative, among whom were Judge Thomas and Pierre Van Cortlandt, against fifteen, * One of those letters, if not more of them, was noticed in our statement of the measures of the Cuniniittcu of Correspondence in New York, relative to its proposition for the convention of a Congress of the Colo- nies, |iage 23, ante. 5 Jourtial of the Ilonte, "Die Jovis, 10 ho., A.M., the ItUh February, "1775." * Jmmtal of the Hniite, " Die Veneris, 1(1 ho., A.M., the 17th February, " 1775;" Lit^iteiiniii'ijoreniur Cvhlen to Gmerat " Nkw York '2"th " Fcl.r>-, 177.5." See, also, Dunlap"s HiOory of Xeic-Yorlc, ■.,454, 455. 228 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. in the negative, among whom were Colonel Philipse and Isaac Wilkins.^ On the twenty third of February, Crean Brush, of Cumberland-county, from the Committee which had been appointed to prepare a State of the Grievances of this Colony, presented a Report from that Committee; which was " referred to the consideration of a Com- " mittee of the Whole House, and be proceeded on, " by the said Committee, on Wednesday next." - Immediately after the Report on the Grievances of the Colony had been thus referred. Judge John Thomas, one of the Representatives of Westchester- county, and a leading member of the minority, offered a Resolution providing that " the sense of this House "be taken on the necessity of appointing Delegates "for this Colony, to meet the Delegates for the other " Colonies on this Continent, in General Congress, " on the tenth day of May next." The introduction of that resolution led to a spirited Debate in which the motives of the rival factions composing the con- federated party of the Opposition and the undue assumption of authf)rity which had not been dele- i gated to it, by the recently held Congress of the Con- tinent, were freely and ably discussed by Colonel Philip Schuyler and George Clinton, in support of the Resolution, and by Crean Brush and Isaac Wil- kins,' in opposition to it ; and the consideration of the subject was closed by the rejection of the Resolution, by a vote of nine in the affirmative and seventeen in the negative, the four Representatives from the County of Westchester being divided between the two factions, as they had beeu in the previous divi- sions of the House.* The well-considered and, under the circumstances, the judicious determination of the majority of the General Assembly, to unite in the general opposition to the Colonial policy of the Home Government, in the general demand for a redress of the a.ssumed griev- ances of the Colonies, and in the generally expressed desire to restore the harmony between the Colonies and the Mother Country, which the infliction of those grievances had disturbed, without, however, recogniz- ing the existence of any other opposition thereto, in any other person, in any other organization, or in any 1 Jovrnid of the Hmtse, "Die Martis, TO ho., A.M., the 21st Febniarj-, "1775j;" Lieutenant-Governor Colden to General Gnge, "New York 20th "Febry, 1775." ^ Journal of the Houte, "Die Jovis, in ho., .\.M., tlie 2'iii February, " 1775." Lieulenmit-governor CoUhn to Gemral Gage, "New York, 2iith " Febry 1775 ; " the same to the Earl of Dartmouth, " New York, 1st Jfarch, " 177.5." 'Speeches, made by Brush and Wilkins, on that occasion, may be seen in Force's American Archires, Fourth Series, i., 1290-1207, the former re-printed from Rivington'it New-York Gazetteer, No. 9H, New-York, Thursday, March 2, 1775 ; the latter from tlie Siime paper, No. 103, New- York, Thursday, April 6, 1775. Students of the history of the Eevolu- tion in the Colonies will be well paid for the time occupied in a careful perusal of those Speeches, in connection with the other literature of that subject, published during that period. * Journal of the House, "Die .lovis, 10 ho., A.M., the 23d of February, " 1775 ; " Lieuienant-gocemor Colden to the Eurl of Dartmouth, " New York, " 1st March, 1775." other line of action, in Xew York or elsewhere, in order that its particular opposition might not en- counter that reasonable disregard of the Home Gov- ernment which the opposition of those who were in open insurrection would surely encounter, was as well known to the minority of that General Assembly, especially after the rejection of the Resolution offered by Colonel Ten Broeck and the subsequent adofjtion of those offered, respectively, by Peter R. Livingston and James De Lancey, as it was to the greater number of the members of that body, who sustained it; and a decent respect for the welfare of the Colony, that great end which all professed to regard as greater than all others, if that profession had been honestly made, would, unquestionably, have induced every member of each of the factions to have labored, earn- est!}' and harmoniously, in the sincere promotion of the common cause. But it was clearly shown that " the common cause," which was so loudly talked of, was only a secondary matter ; that per.sonal and factional interests were, in fact, regarded as superior i to the interests of the country ; that it was the pur- pose of the minority and of those with whom it affil- iated, for the especial advancement of their individual and factional interests, to obtain the entire control of the political affairs of the Colony, even at the expense of a revolutionary overthrow of the entire structure of the Colonial Government ; that, for the pro- motion of that purpose, the series of Resolutions submitted by the minority, from that submitted by Colonel Schuyler to that submitted by Judge Thomas, was prepared and submitted with an entire knowledge that it would be promptly rejected by the House, as inconsistent with the line of action which the majority had adopted, for its guidance; and that the successive votes of the General Assembly, by which those Resolutions were successively re- jected, divested of all that was so well known of the purposes of that body and surrounded with all of insinuation and falsehood which inilividual animosity and factional zeal could contrive, were industriously presented, one after another, in their nakedform, to the populace in New York City and elsewhere, as evi- dences, as false as they were mischievous, of what was unduly assumed to have been the antagonism of the General Assembly to the common cause, and, at the same time, for the purpose of gradually under- mining the affection for the Mother Country, which generally prevailed, throughout the Colony, and of preparing the populace for a revolutionary transfer of the legislative, as well as for that of the executive and judicial, authority of the Colonial Government, into other channels, in the interest of Rebellion, wherein the control would be assumed by other, if not by better, men. Having fully accomplished its preliminary purpose, in securing from the legally constituted Legislature of the Colony a rejection of the several revolutionary Resolutions which it had submitted, and in, thereby. Till': AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 229 affording a pretext to those of its confederates, not of the General Assembly, for the assumption, by them, of authority, nominally in the name of the body of the Colonists but really in known opposition to the inclinations of by far the greater number, to call a Convention of the Colony, in the interests of Rebel- lion, in -which should be reposed the uncontrolled power of exercising the various functions of an inde- pendent, despotic Government, without any limitation, and in open disregard of the existing, legally-consti- tuted Government of the Colony — having accom- plished that preliminary purpose, the minority of the Assembly discontinued the submission of Resolutions of any character ; and, as will be seen, all its labors were subsequently devoted to the promotion of its factional purposes, only, in the consideration of the papers which the House had ordered to be prepared and laid before it, in which, however, the majority afforded very slight reasons for complaint. On the appointed day, [March 1, 1775] the Assem- bly, in Committee of the Whole House, Colonel Ben- jamin Seaman, of Richmond-county, occupying the Cliair, commenced, the consideration of the State of the Colony's Grievances, which had been reported by the Special Committee which had prepared it ; ' and after having spent the entire day thereon, as well as the whole of the following day'^ and the greater por- tion of the succeeding day,' also, in Committee of the Whole House, the latter day's session was closed by the adoption of the Report, by the Assembly, with a single Amendment, which was submitted by Colonel Philip Schuyler, and supi)orted by nine of the minor- ity, and five of the majority — the only Amendment which was submitted by any one — a marked feature of the proceedings having been that the amended State of the Grievances of this Colony was adopted by the House, without a division.* ^ Jnnriinl of the Home, "Die Mercurij, lit h.)., A.M., tlie latMarch, - Journal of the Ilonse. "DieJovis, 10 ho., A.M., the 2d March, 1775." ^ Juuiwil of the Hrwite, "Die Veneris, 10 ho., A.M., the 3d March, " 1773." * With that lack of modesty and tnithfiiliies,-< whicli characterized all, concerning hid own family, which John C. Ilaniiltou wrote, that gentle- man (llUtonj of the llepMk, \., .SI, iji i has undertaken to ;;lorify Colonel Schnyler, his grandfather, by faUifyini; the record, concerning this StaU of tiri*frourf». In the Committee which had been appointed for the preparation of the Suie, in which every member brought forward whatever he regarded as a Grievance, and not in the body of the Assenibly, aa is meanly insinu- I ated. Colonel Schnyler introduced the .\ct of 4th George III., Chapter XV., a.s such a Grievance, which was approved and accepted by the Committee, with only two dissenting votes, notwithstanihng the over- whelming majority, in that Committee, who was opposed to Colonel Schuyler. When the Report was considered iu Committee of the Whole House, there was not the slightest opposition to it ; and when the Com- mittee of the House rejtorted the completed paper to the House, John C. Hamilton to the contrary notwithstanding, the entire Ulule was adopted without a division. He also alluded to the third of the Grievances, offered in the original Committee, by James De Lancey, recognizing the Kight of the Govern- ment of Great Britain to regulate the Trade of the Colonies and to iniiMW! Duties on such articles, the products of foreign Nations, as should be imported, directly, into the Colonies — the same, in substance The State of Grievances which was thus adopted by the General Assembly of New York included not only all thbse Acts of the Parliament of Great Britain, relating to or affecting the Colony of New York, for which Colony only the Assembly presumed to legis- late, which the Congress of the Continent had in- cluded in the Bill of Rights and C/vevances which that body had adopted and published, but it included the additional Grievance inflicted in the Act of 6th George III., Chapter XII., " declaring the Right of " Parliament to bind the Colonies in all cases what- " soever," and that inflicted in the Act of 35th Henry VIII., Chapter II., authorizing the removal of pris- oners accused of Crimes committed in America, to England, for Trial, neither of which was included in that Bill of Rights and Grievances which the Congress had published. It included, also, the Act of 7th George III., Chapter LIX., " requiring the Legisla- " ture of this Colony to provide for the Services there- " in mentioned, without application made to the " Representatives of the I'eople of this Colony, in " General Assembly, and holding up, by any other " Acts, a Suspension of the legislative powers of this " Colony, until such Requisitions be complied with ;" the Act of 14th George III. Chapter LXXXIII., "so " far as it may be construed to establish the Roman " Catholic Religion in the Province of Quebec," and " so far as it imposes Duties upon certain Ar- " tides of Merchandise imported into that Province," '■■ which by another Statute of the same year, Chajiter " LXXXVIII., is so extended as to comprehend all the " Indian (Country, from Hudson's Bay to the Mouth " of the Ohio-river ;" and the four Acts especially re- lating to Boston and the Colony, of Ma.ssachusetts- Bay, all of which it declared to be Grievances of this Colony f and, as has been said, it concurred in that if npt in words, as that, on the same subject, which the Congress of the Continent had recently adopted — and he glorified his grandfather, because of that gentleman's labors in opposing it, and iu endeavoring to qualify the Assembly's recognition of that Right, through an .\mend- ment, which the Committee had rejected ; without, however, alluding to that other fact that, in all that his grandfather did, on that occa- sion, he did in open antagonism to the action of the Continental Con- gress, on the same subject — he does not siiy, also, that all that which has been described wiu done in the original Committee ; that when the Report of the Committee was submitted to the Committee of the Whole House, tliiit larger body reversed the action of the original I 'unnnittee, and united with Colonel .Schuyler and his associates in the minority, in their quulitication of that portion of the proceedings of the Continental Congress ; nor that the House itself, when it accepted the completed SI'ili', endoi-seil and approved that i nipliatic repudiation of .Tames Duane, and of .lohn .\ilams, and of their unqiialiHed recognition of the Right of the Mother Country to regulate the Trade of the Colonies and to receive the beneRts of that Commerce. Philip Schuyler needed no such lictitious praise, even from his grandson ; anil, although he was willing to promote the interests of his faction, he does not appear to have been thus employed, in what he did as a member of that Committee for preparing a State of the iirierance» of thin (Jolonij, nor in any proceedings thereon, either in Counuittee of the Whole House or in the .Vssembly. ^ ■' I waa inform'd that the Boston and Quebec Kills were at first re- "jected in the Committee as not being I'art of the Grievances of this "Colony ; it seems however they were at last brought into the Report, " and I am affraid may not now be got rid of in the House." — (Uew/cn- 230 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. action of the Continental Congress, moved by James Duane and supported by John Adams, and nearly in its words, ^ recognizing the Right of the Parliament " to regulate the Trade of the Colonies, and to lay " Duties on articles that are imported, directly, into " this Colony, from any foreign Country or Planta- " tation, which may interfere with the Products or " Manufactures of Great Britain or any other parts of " His Majesty's Dominions," qualified however, by " excluding every idea of Taxation, internal or exter- " nal, for the purpose of raising a Revenue on the "Subjects in America, without their Consent." It will be seen, therefore, that the State of the Grievances of this Colony, adopted and published by the General Assembly, was more extended than the Bill of Rights and Grievances which the Congress of the Colonies had adopted and published ; and it will be seen, also, by any one who will compare the two papers, that the former, both in its tone and in its terms, was quite as firm and quite as plain spoken, on the several sub- jects to which it was devoted, as was the latter ; and that, in the adoption and promulgation of that State, the majority of the Assembly openly maintained its character aiul standing, as intelligent and fearless op- ponents of the Coloniid policy of the Home Govern- ment, without impairing its consistency as Members of the Legislature of a Colony— even the factional confederates of the minority, out in the jiopulace, because of that Act, was compelled to acknowledge the fidelity of the majority, and to admit, in their correspondence with each other, that the State of the Grievances in this Colony which it liad i)repared and promulgated, was an accurate exposition of the feel- ings and opinions of the great body of the Colonists, in New York, wherever any feelings or opinions, on those subjects, really existed, concerning their griev- ances, and altogetlier favorable to the common cause. On the seventh of Mare'li, James De Lancey, and Benjamin Kissam, of New York City, and George Clinton, of Ulster-county, were appointed a Com- mittee to prepare the series of Resolutions re- quired as a basis for the Petition to the King, which had been ordered by the House, on the thirty-first of January preceding ;' and, on the following day, Benja- min Kissam reported, from that Committee, a series of Resolutions, agreeably to that Order. The Assembly promptly went into a Committee of the Whole House, with Colonel Benjamin Seaman, of Richmond-county, atil-ijoi'ernor Coldeii to the Eiiil of harlmoulh, " New York, 1st March, " 1775,") 1 Bancroft's Iliston/ of th" Uniktl St(ttfin^ original edition, vii., I:i0, 140; the same, centenary edition, iv., 401, 402. 2 In a letter written by Alexander McDoiigal, the well-known popular leader, addressed to Jcsiah Quincy, Junior, then in London, and dated " New-Yohk. April 6, 1775," the student of the history of the Revolution, in New Y'ork, may find much, relating to the opinions of the revolution- ary elenu'ntsin tliat Colony, concerning this State, as well iis cuiioe ning other kindred subjects. »Joiirw(l of the lions,; "Die Martis, 10 ho., A.Jl., the 7th March, " 1776." in the Chair ; and proceeded to consider the Report which had thus been presented; and, after having made some amendments in the proposed Resolutions,* the Chairman reported the result of the Committee's deliberations to the House; and, after some discus- sion, the House agreed with the Committee, in its Report and Resolutions.^ The first of these Resolutions, following the general sentiment of the CoIonLsts, acknowledged the Faith and Allegiance to the King which were due to him from " the people of this Colony." The second ac- knowledged that the Colonists " owe obedience to all " Acts of Parliaments calculated for the general weal "of the whole Empire and the due regulation of the " Trade and Commerce thereof, and not inconsistent "with the essential Rights and Liberties of English- "men, to which they are equally entitled with their " fellow-subjects in Great Britain." The third de- clared " that it is essential to Freedom and the un- " doubted Right of Englishmen, that no Taxes be " imposed on them but with their consent, given per- "sonally or by their Representatives in General As- "sembly." The fourth maintained "that the Acts of " Parliament, raising a Revenue in America especially "to jirovide for the support of the Civil Government " and administration of Justice in the Colonies, ex- " tending the Jurisdiction of the Courts of Admiralty "beyond their ancient limits, authorizing the. Judge's " Certificate to indemnify the Prosecutor from Dam- " ages he would otherwise be liable to, giving them a " concurrent Jurisdiction of Causes heretofore cog- " nizable only in the Courts of Common Law, and by " that means depriving the American Subject of his " Trjal by a Jury, are destructive to Freedom, and " subversive of the Rigiits and liiberties of the Colo- "nies." The fifth and last of these Resolutions de- clared " that a Trial by a Jury of the Vicinage, in all "Ca[)ital Cases, is the grand Security of Freedom and " the Birthright of Englishmen ; and, therefore, that " the seizing any Person or Persons, residing in this " Colony, suspected of Treasons, Misprisions of " Treason, or any other Offences, and sending such "Person or Persons out of the same, to be tried, is dan- "gerous to the Lives and Liberties of His Majesty's " American Subjects."" The politicians of New York, those of later as well ^ As the action of the Committee which resulted in those Amend- ments was not generally noticed on the Jouni'tl or in the lit-port, it is very evit'eut that they were, generally, only verbal corrections, unim- portant in character, and involving no distinguishing princii)les. But there were two amendments, proposed by Colonel Nathaniel WoodhuII and George Clinton respectively, which were rejected, although the the motions for amemlment were supported, in each instance, by several members of the ma^iority, as well as by the full force of the minority ; but because the principle involved in each of the proposed Amend- ments was distinctly declared in another of the Resolutions, the rejection of the proposition to repeat it, possessed no political significance what- ever. '^Joiiniid of the House, "Die 3Iercurij, 10 ho., A.M., the 8th JIurch, " 1775." 6 Ilnd. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 231 as those of earlier periods, have always been unlike those of any other Colony, or State, or Country ; and in the matter of these declaratory Resolutions, the spirit and terms of which were quite as radical in their character as could have been desired by the most advanced republican who was not an anarchist, the well-established reputation of those politicians was amply sustained — every member of the majority of the Assembly, including James DeLancey, John Cruger, Benjamin Kissam, Crean Brush, Isaac Wilkins, and Frederic Phili])se, except John Coe, of Orange- county, and Dirck Brinckerhoff', of Duchess-county, voted in favor of the adoption of them and, of course, in favor of the embodiment of their terms in an Address to the King ; while every member of the minority of the House, with Coe and Brinckerhoff of the majority, voted in opposition to the adoption of them. Factional and partisan bitterness, very often, produces such remarkable instances of the inconsistency, if not of the incomprehensibility, of mere politicians ; but history aflbrds few, if any, such examples, among those who were really patriotic, as were afforded by John Thomas and Pierre Van Cort- landt, by Peter R. Livingston and Nathaniel Wood- hull, by George Clinton and Philip Schuyler, in the instance under consideration, when they voted against the Resolutions which have been fully de- scribed and, consequently, against the great political principles which were asserted and maintained there- in, for no other reason which is now discoverable than the peculiar fact that those Resolutions had proceeded from and were, then, supported by the majority of the Assembly, by that faction of the great party ofthe Opposition of which all were equally mem- bers, to which they — those who have been named and those who were with them — did not belong.' Whatever may have influenced those who had as- sumed to be the peculiarly disinterested and sincere supporters of the common cause, in their united vote to reject the Resolutions which are, now, under con- sideration, those who are of the Westchester-county of the present day will continue to be interested- in the fact that, on that very critical occasion, when the eyes of all sober-minded men, in Europe as well as in America, were turned toward that small Assembly- chamber, Isaac Wilkins, of the Borough of West- chester, and Frederic Philipse, representing the body of the County, manfully declared the Rights of the Colonists and those of the Colonies, and bravely re- sisted what were regarded as the usurpations of the Home Government; while Pierre Van Cortlandt, of the Manor of Cortlandt, and John Thomas, repre- senting the body of the County, quite as manfully opposed them, and, indirectly, quite as bravely denied the existence of those individual and Colonial Rights, > The official record of the votes of the several Members of the Assem- bly, of both factions of tlic party of tlio Opposition, as it may be seen in the Jonrunl of Of Ilimae, is one of the most curious and most unaccount- able, within our knowledge. and quite as boldly sustained the Home Government, in what it bad done, as any open and avowed " friend of the Government " could have done, had one been present, — a lesson of the highest importance to those who shall incline to ascertain the exact truth, concerning the origin ofthe American Revolu- tion and the purposes of those who promoted it, with- in the Colony of New York, may be seen in the sim- ple record of this single action of the Representatives of Colonial New York, in her General" Assembly, in 1775. On the day after these Resolutions had been adopted by the Assembly, [March fth,] that body ordered the appointment of " a Committee to prepare and lay "before the House, with all convenient sj)eed, the " Draft of an humble, firm, dutiful, and loyal Petition, "to be presented to our most Gracious Sovereign," pursuant to Colonel Peter R. Livingston's Motion on the thirty-first of the preceding January ; and William Nicoll, of Suffolk-county, Leonard Van- Kleeck, of Duchess-county, and Isaac Wilkins, of the Borough of Westchester, were appointed the Committee for that purpose. During the same day, Crean Brush, from Cumberland-county, Colonel Ben- jamin Seaman, of Richmond-county, and Samuel Gale, of Orange-county, were appointed a Committee " to prepare the Draft of a Memorial to the Lords ;" and Daniel Kissam, of Queens-county, and James De Lancey and Jacob Walton, of the City of New York, were appointed a Committee " to prepare the " Draft of a Representation and Remonstrance to the " Commons of Great Britain," both of them pursuant to the Resolution offered by James De Lancey, to which reference has been already made.- The House directed, also, that the Drafts of those several papers should be laid before it, " with all convenient "speed."'' It will be seen that on neither of these Committees was there a single member of the minority of the House, notwithstanding the Resolution on which the first-named of those Committees was ap])ointcd origi- nated with a leading member of that faction, and notwithstanding, also, both the Resolutions pursuant to which all the Committees were appointed, had been adopted in the Assembly by an unanimous vote, every member of each of the two factions, in tempor- ary harmony and good-will, having united in approv- ing and supporting them — ^an evident result of the bitter factional feeling which had been aroused, first by the evidently dishonorable conduct of the minority, in springing upon the Assembly the Resolution which was offered by Colonel Ten Broeck, on the twenty- sixth of January, for taking into consideration the Proceedings ofthe Congress ofthe Colonies, while a "Call of the House," asked for by itself and for its - Vide pages oO, 51, ante. ^Journal of the Hoiw, "Die Jovis, 10 ho., .4.M., the 9th of .March, "1775.' 232 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. peculiar advantage, was pending ; ' and, subsequently, by the peculiarly factional proceedings of the minor- ity, in the presentation of Resolution after Resolu- tion, only for the promotion of Revolution ; and in its dishonorable opposition, while the Assembly was considering the Sfafe of the Grievances and the series of declaratory Resolutions, to all of which proceed- ings reference has been herein made.^ On the sixteenth of March, Isaac Wilkins, from the Committee appointed to prepare it, reported " the " Draft of a Petition to the King ; " and, immediately afterwards, Crean Brush, from the Committee ap- pointed to prepare it, reiwrted " a Draft of a Alemor- "ial to the Lords." During the same day, James De Lancey, from the Committee appointed to prepare it, reported " the Draft of a Representation and Renion- "strance to the Commons of Great Britain ; " and the Asseml)ly prom])tly referred all those papers, for con- sideration, to a Committee of the Whole House.^ On the twenty-fourth of March, the Assembly re- solved itself into a Committee of the Whole House, upon the Draught of a Petition to the King, Colonel Benjamin Seaman, of Richmond-county, being in the Chair; and, again, the minority displayed its fiiction- al animosity by presenting Amendment after Amend- ment, by far the greater number of them being merely verbal, without disturbing either the sense or the spirit of the original. In one instance, however, very unaccountably and not very consistently. Colo- nel Philip Schuyler appeared to have entertained a more than usually tender regard for His ilajesty's " prerogative," in the matter of the Paper Currency of the Colony, " in the preservation of which prerog- " ative," he said, " we are deeply interested ; " and an Amendment, on that subject, which he submitted, was adopted by the House, without a division. An- other Amendment, concerning the Judiciary of the Colony, and entirely cancelling the jjaragraph, on that subject, which the Committee had reported, was submitted by George Clinton, of Ulster-county, and agreed to, by an unanimous A'ote of the House; and another Amendment, submitted by Colonel Frederic Philipse, by striking the words " seem to," from one of the paragraphs, and, by doing so, making the Acts relating to Boston and the Colony of Massachusetts- Bay real/i/ " establish adangerous precedent, by inflict- " ing Punishment without the formality of a Trial," instead of only seeming to do so, as the original para- graph described them, really strengthened the Peti- tion, in its assertion of the Grievances to which the Colonies had been subjected.* As the records of the closing portion of the proceedings of the Committee of the Whole House and those of all that the House, 1 Vide pages 49, 50, ante. - Vide pages 51-53, ante. 3 Jin'rmd of the Hotis", " Pie .Jovis, 10 lio., A.M., tlie liitli March, "1775." * Journal of the i/oi>sc, " Die Veneris, 10 lio., A.M., flie 21tli March, "1775." itself, did, on this subject, "are missing," in our copy of the Journal, the details of those proceedings cannot be given ; * but history bears testimony to the general fact that, in its amended form, the Petition to the King was duly agreed to, by the Assembly.* On the same day, \_March l-^tli], the Meynorial to the House of Lords and the Representation and Remon- strance to the House of Commons, after several Amend- ments, none of them possessing any importance whatever and only three of them having called for a division of the House, had been negatived in the Committee of the Whole House, were successively re- ported to the House ; and, in the respective forms in which they were thus reported, the House adopted them, in each instance, without a division of the House.' On the following morning, [J/arc^ 25/A] the en- grossed copies of the Petition to the King,^ the Memor- ial to the Lords,^ and the Representation and Remon- strance to the Commons of Great Britain^^ were respect- ively presented to the House, read, and again agreed to, in each case without a division of the House. In each instance, also, the Speaker was ordered to sign the document, in behalf of the House; and, after having ordered the Speaker to transmit these three several petitions to the King, the Lords, and the Commons, " with all convenient speed, to Edmund " Burke, Esquire, Agent of this Colony at the Court " of Great Britain ; and that a Letter be prepared, to " be approved by this House, to the said Agent, with "directions that he present the same, in behalf of "this Colony, as they are respectively directed, as "soon after the receipt thereof as possible;" and with the additional Order " that Mr. Speaker trans- "mit, at the same time, to the Agent, the State of the " Grievances of this Colony and the Resolutions of "this House thereupon," the House adjourned." On the thirty-first of March, the Assembly ordered the Speaker to send to the Speakers of the several Houses of A.«sembly on this Continent, as soon after 5 The original Jmtnmta nf tlie Axsemtili/ which included the proceedings oftlie entire Session wliicli is now under consideration, were lost during tlie trouljlesome times of tliat period ; and the only known copy of the original printeil edition of those Jourtiah wanted four pages, in this portion of it. Tliose niissing pages contained the closing portion of the proceedings of the House, on the Petition to the King, as stated in the text, and the opening of its proceedings on the Memorial to the House of Lonls. "The conijileted Petition to the King, signed by the Speaker of the As- senihly, may be seen in tlie Jonrnal of the Assenihtij, " Die Sabbati, 10 "ho., A.M., the 2r)th March 1775." Joiininl ofthf Hmi.ie, "Die Veneris, 10 ho., AM., the 24th M.arch " 177.")." The defect in the Joiinial, as it is now known to us, to which reference has been made, leaves us without any information concerning the proceedings of the House on the first twenty paragraphs of the Me- morial to the Hou-te of Lords. ^Journal of the Honxe, " Die Sabbati, 10 ho., A. M., tlie 25th March " 1775." ,» IIA:1. yjonrnol if the Hniisr, "Die Sabbati, i ho., P.M., the 25th March, " 1775." 11 Ihiil. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 233 the rise of this House as conveniently may be, copies of the State of the Grievances, of the Resolutions of the House, of the Petition to the King, of the Memor- ial to the Lords, and of the Representation and Remon- strance to the Commons, requesting those several Speakers to lay the same before their respective Houses of Assembly, at their first meeting after the receipt thereof.' On the following day, [^April Ist.'] the Assembly ap- pointed " a Standing Committee of Correspondence," composed of the Speaker, [John Oriiger,'] James De Lancey, James Jauncey, Benjamin Kissam, and Jacob Walton, all of them from the City of New York, Benjamin Seaman, of Richmond-county, Isaac Wil- kins, of the Borough of Westchester, Frederic Phil- ipse, of Westchester-county, Zebulon Seaman, of Queens-county, John Rapalje and Simon Boerum, of Kings-county, Samuel Gale, of Orange-county, and George Clinton, of Ulster-county, or any seven of them, " whose duty it shall be to obtain the most " early and authentic intelligence of all such Acts "and Resolutions of the British Parliament or Pro- "ceedingsof Administration as do or may relate to " or atlect the Liberties and Privileges of His Ma- "jesty's Subjects, in the British Colonies in America "and to keep up and maintain a Correspondence and " Communication with our Sister Colonies, respecting " these important considerations ; and the result of "their Proceedings to lay before the House." - On the following Monday, the third of April, the Assembly adjourned until the third of May;^ and that eventful Session of the last General Assembly of the Colony of New York, which was assembed lor the discharge of legislative duties, was ended. That General Assembly and all that it did, from the opening of the Session until the final declaration of its Speaker l)rought that Session to a close, have been made the themes of unceasing misrepresentation and abuse or of absolute and contemptuous silence, from far the greater number of those who have as- sumed to write or to speak concerning the history of that notable period. They have been the themes, sometimes, of ignorant and unscrupulous bigots and, sometimes, of intelligent and unscrupulous tricksters; sometimes a personal and sometimes a local end has been served by either a falsification or a concealment of the truth, concerning them; and, sometimes, frag- ments of useless and glittering rhetoric, strung to- gether, as farmers string fragments of useless and glittering tin and display them in order to deceive and to scatter unsuspecting birds from their corn- fields, in like manner, have been employed by literary prestidigitators, in order to deceive those who are less intelligent than themselves, concerning that As- 'Jonnia/ u/ the Wiutr, "Die Veneris, 10 lio., .\.M., the 3lst March, " 1775." ^ Jmimal of the Hmw, "Die Sabbati, 10 ho., .\.M., the Ist April, "1775." 3 Jintrnat of the Uouse, "Die Lumr, 10 ho., A.M., the :!<1 April, 177.')." scmbly, and its members, and their doings ; and, through that deception, to promote their own or their party's or their sectional purposes. Individual mem- bers of that Assembly, men of honor aiKl unimpeach- able integrity, have been stigmatized as " wretches," and as " the veriest reptiles on earth" and charged with '' corruption " and every kindred vice — some of them were driven from their families and their homes ; others of them were lawlessly seized and carried from their families and their homes, exiled, and held in lawless bondage ; and others of them were stripped of their patrimonial estates or of the estates of their own creation — only because they had preferred, as Members of that Assembly, to assert the Grievances under which the Colony was said to have been labor- ing and to demand a Redress of those alleged Griev- ances, not with any less distinctness of words nor with any less firmness of manner, but after a manner and through instrumentalities of their own selection and which possessed their greater confidence, rather than after a manner and through instrumentalities which others would have thrust on them, which their own sense of fitness and adaptability had not ap- proved, which were controlled by men in whose noisy pretensions to personal and jjolitical integrity they could not repose confidence. Measures which were sincerely intended for the promotion of the common cause of the Colonies, in their struggle with the Home Government, — measures which presented noth- ing else than political principles or recitals of facts which no one, of any sect or fiiction, pretended to dispute — were opposed, vehemently and without measure, within as well as without the Assembly, only because they had 'not originated and were not supported before the House, by the opjjosite faction of the Opj)osition ; and, with that hereditary, or sec- tional, or sectarian, or partisan bitterness which the lapse of years has served only to intensify, that work of depreciation and misrepresentation of those meas- ures and of all who favored them, continues to dis- grace much, at the present day, which is audaciously called " history." A candid and carefully-made comparison of the terms of those several State of Grievances, and de- claratory Resolutions, and Pttition, and Memorial, and Representation and Remonstrance, which were prepared, and agreed to, and presented, and published by that uuicli-abused General Assembly of Colonial New York, with the several Resolutions, and Decla- ration of Rights, and Association, and Addresses, and Memorials, and Petition, which, in like manner, were prepared, and agreed to, and presented, and published ' by the much-eulogized Congress of the Continent, which had assembled in Pliiladeli)hia, in September, 1774, will clearly establish the fact that the former were 1 quite as decided, in their tone, and quite as clear and j distinct, in their terms, as the latter; and such a I comparison will also clearly establish the fact that, I in its continuous and violent o|)position to the former. 234 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. in every stage of its progress through the House, the minority of that General Assembly was clearly actu- ated by some other motive than that of simple, un- contaminated*patriotism. It will be seen, also, by every careful and candid reader of the published proceedings of that Congress to which reference has been made, that, notwithstand- ing the gravamen of the declared Grievances of the constituent Colonies, of that notable body, consisted of sundry Acts of Parliament, all of which were con- sidered as oppressive, it had made no attempt what- ever, either by Petition or otherwise, to induce the Parliament to remove or even to modify those Griev- ances, or any of them, by a repeal or even by an amendment of the obnoxious provisions of those op- pressive legal enactments, contenting itself, instead, with preparing, and agreeing to, and presenting, only Addresses to the People of Great Britain, to the Inhab- itants of the Province of Qvtbec, and to the King, and a Memorial to the Inhabitants of the British Colonies, respectively, not one of whom possessed the slightest legislative authority, nor the slightest ability, in any way, to remove nor even to modify those Grievances, whatever might have been its disposition to have done so — indeed, notwithstanding the well-known desires of the great body of the Colonists, throughout the entire Continent, notwithstanding the known purposes for which that Congress had been convened, and notwithstanding the express i)rovisions of the greater number of the Credentials of the several Del- egations, the proceedings of that Congress were mainly declaratory and justificatory of Rebellion, with scarcely an effort to obtain a redress of Grievances, and nothing whatever for the yet more desired reconciliation and union with the Mother Country, "so. beneficial to the "whole Empire, and so ardently desired by all British "America,"'' for "the restoration of union and har- " mony between Great Britain and the Colonies, most " ardently desired by all good men." - The tone and the tendency of all that it did, however, were pecu- liarly revolutionary, in all which it was eminently successful and, to that extent, if no further, it had failed to represent, truly, those in whose name it had nominally acted. On the other hand, the General As- sembly of Colonial New York, the legitimacy of whose organization and the entire legality of whose action, in behalf of the common cause, no one has ever presumed to question; without compromising its dignity, as a General Assembly ; with that common sense which, in Europe as well as in America, was, then, so pe- 1 OredentUth of the Delegation from Vinjiuia^ to the Coitgrets. - CredeDlifih of the Ik'legation from Mnsstichitseth, to the CmigrefJt. 3 It is matter of liistory, well known to every student, that the action of the 'Congress on the St^folk-cotiHty liesohttioiis, {Joitnnil of the Onujress, "Saturday, September 17,1774, A.M."), closed the door of reconcilia- tion against the Colonies, and led the Home Government to regard the great body of the Colonists as onlj- rebels, against whom it had become the duty of that Government to throw the weight of its authoritj', a determination for which those Colonists, in their individual relations, had given no warrant, either in their actions or their dispositions. culiarly uncommon ; without entangling itself with any questionable alliance; and without belittling its legitimate influence by expressing its ofiicial sym- pathy with any other body, even in relation to those measures which were similar, in character and pur- pose, to those of its own enactment — that General Assembly, quite as clearly and quite as energetically as the Congress had done, in behalf of its constitu- ents, boldly declared the_Grievances of those whom it rejiresented, in a clear recital of the several Acts of Parliament which had been employed by the Home Government for the oppression of the Colonists ; and, in addition to that recital of specific Statutes which were grievous in their provisions, it adopted a series of Resolutions, declaratory of the general Rights of the Colonists, as Englishmen, " to which they were " equally entitled with their fellow-subjects in Great " Britain " — Resolutions which no one could have made stronger, in support of the common cause. But, unlike that Congress, and more consistently with its duty to its constituency than anything, in that connection, which the Congress had professed to do, that General Assembly, in its official character, approached the King and the two Houses of Parlia- ment, in whom, acting together, rested the only legit- imate authority which could possibly be exercised for the removal of those Grievances which it had described, and for the restoration of that harmony, between the Colonies and the Mother Country, which the former so earnestly desired; and, unto these, respectively, it respectfully presented its manly, and dignified, and legally-expressed prayers for the re- peal of those several Acts or parts of Acts which were oppressive or which threatened to become so. In all these, it violated no law and fostered no spirit of dis- affection. Without the loss of any of that dignity which legitimately belonged to it, and without sacri- ficing any of that respect for its constituents which its duty recjuired it to maintain, it recognized the sovereignty of the King, as the Congress had also done; and, consistently with that dignity and that respect, but with a boldness which was peculiarly its own, at the same time, it also asserted its own stand- ing, as a General Assembly, by memorializing instead of petitioning the Peers, and by representing the facts of the usurpation, to the Commons, and by sup- plementing that "representation" with a "remon- strance" against the action of that distinguished body, in its serious disregard of the Rights of the Colonists. In all these several prayers, with what- ever titles and in whatever form they were presented, the General Assembly employed terms which com- manded the respect of those to whom they were re- spectively addressed ; and, in one instance, so clearly was the Grievance represented and so earnest was the remonstrance which was made against it, in the As- sembly's Remonstrance, that even Lord North was obliged to acknowledge the force and the fitness of the plea, and, in his place in the House of Commons, TPIE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 235 to declare his willingness that that Grievance, if no other of the series, should be duly removed. Notwithstanding all that has bi^en said in deprecia- tion of that particular Colonial General Assembly, it did not consider it necessary, nor even expedient, to override the minority of its members without even recognizing their existence on its Journal, under cover of the subsequently notorious "unit-rule," in recording the votes of its members, nor in any other manner; nor did it conceal its proceedings, whether honestly or questionably determined, by publishing as complete what were only mutilated copies of its Journal, all of which the Congress had done. It might have been charged with " corruption," with some de- gree of propriety, had it purchased an appearance of unanimity in its votes with unexplained exceptions in the mandatory provisions of some of its general en- actments — exceptions in favor of one of the high-con- tracting parties, which were necessarily conceded as equivalents for commercial trickery in another — as the Congress had done ; but the divided votes which are presented on nearly every page of its Journal very clearly indicate that, whatever of factional bitterness there might have been, neither codfish nor rice was recognized as an element in the determination of grave questions, affecting the peace of the Colonies and the welfare and happiness of millions, in Europe as well as in America. On the contrary, what it did was done honorably, and openly, and in conformity with the requirements of parliamentary, as well as of constitutional. Law ; not by unanimous Votes, actual or fictitious, but by a majority of its members, duly and courteously exercising the authority with which that majority was duly and legally vested. It was not done by the action of the minority of that Assembly, which represented the revolutionary element of the Inhabitants of the City of New York more completely and with greaterzeal than itrepresented those several constituencies who had given seats, in that body, to it ; but it was done in the face of that tactions minor- ity, and notwithstanding its open, persistent, and res- olute opposition. It was not done by reason of any prompting or intiuencc of either the Colonial or the Home Government ; but in well-known opposition to the wishes and the expectations of both. It was not done because of any popular influence, present or prospective ; but only from the personal knowledge of its members, concerning the great wrongs to which, it was said, the Colonies had been subjected, concern- ing the rights and the interests of the Colonists which had been invaded, ancl concerning the measures which were necessary for the j)rotcction of those invaded rights and interests, for securing a redress of those great wrongs, and for the restoration of harmony and peace. In fact, that General Assembly, in all the proceedings of which mention has been made, more clearly and more faithfully represented the interests and the opinions and the inclinations, concerning governmental matters, of the aggregate body of the Colonists, in New York, including every class, and sect, and political party — and it possessed no authority to represent any other, and made no pretension to do so — than either the Congress of the Continent or the fragmentary revolutionary faction within the Colony had done or possibly could do; and there is very great reason for the belief that its orderly, and digni- fied, and more practically sensible influence would have been recognized beyond the limits of New York, and that it would have succeeded in its honorable efforts and evidently earnest purposes to restore, per- manently and without dishonor, that harmony be- tween the Colonies and the IMother Country which all professed to desire, had not the rashness of General Gage, in Massachusetts, during the brief recess which it had voted to itself, broken the well-strained barriers of Peace, loosed the worst elements of human nature in the Colonists, overturned everything which per- tained to a Government of Law, and plunged the Continent into all the horrors of a needless and, nec- essarily, a bitter fratricidal War — a War which, at its conclusion, the farmers of Westchester-county, or those of them who remained, more than all New England combined, had sorrowful reasons for remem- bering, because of the devastated homesteads, the divided families, the antagonistic neighbors, and the remembrance of plunder, and outrages, and butcheries, among them, of which that War had been so abund- antly and so sadly productive. A few words only are required to complete the record of the results of that much-slandered General Assembly; and the space which they will occupy cannot be better occupied. The Petition which was officially sent to the Agent of the Colony, the celebrated Edmund Burke, for presentation to the King, was duly laid before the Sovereign ; ' but, iinismuch as the General Assembly had, also, addressed the Parliament, on the same sub- jects, it is not known that any i)articular attention was paid to it. On the fifteenth of May, tiie distinguished Agent ot the Colony, offered to be presented to the House of Com- mons, the JRepresentation and Remondrance which the Colonial General Assembly had addressed to that body ; and, in doing so, Mr. Burke made a short Speech, in which he told the House that "'they never " had before them so fair an opportunity of i)utting " an end to the unhappy disputes with the Colonies, " as at present ; and he conjured them, in the most 1 " Mr Biirke having delivered to me tlie Petition to tlie King, I haIay i'J, 17T'i.''j » 236 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. earnest manner, not to let it escape, as possibly, the " like might never return ; " closing his remarks with the statement that " he had, several times in " the Session, expressed his sentiments, very fullj', "upon everything contained in that Remonstrance ; " as for the rest, it spoke so strongly for itself that he " did not see how people in their senses could refuse " at least the consideration of so reasonable and de- " cent an address ; " and, after having " stated the " heads of the Remonstrance" " he moved for leave to " bring it up." The Ministry was not as well dis- posed, however, as Mr. Burke appeared to suppose ; and Lord North promptly took the floor, to reply to what that gentleman had said. He commenced by asking the Clerk to read the official record of the proceedings of the House, in December, 1768, on a Petition of the General Assembly of Pennsylvania, and what was known as the Z'fc/ara/ory Act; and he continued by saying that he was " greatly in favour of " New York ; aud that he would gladly do everything " in lus power to shew his regard to the good behaviour " of that Colony; " but he declared that the " honour " of Parliament required that no paper should be pre- " sented to that House, which tended to call in ques- " tion the unlimited Rights of Parliament." "As to " the Quebec Duties," which was one of the Griev- ances against which the General Assembly had re- monstrated, he said "he did not pretend to be iufal- " lible ; he confessed they were not laid as they ought " to be; and he declared that he was willing to give " satisfaction, in tliat point, immediately." "This, " however," he said, " was but a tritie to the general " ol)jects of the Remonsirance.'' An earnest Debate ensued, Messrs. Cornwall and Jenkinson supporting the Ministry, and Messrs. Cruger, Aubrey, Charles James Fox, and Governor Johnstone supporting Mr. Burke ; and that was followed by the submission by Lord North, of an Amendment to Mr. Burke's Motion " for leave to bring up," making it read thus : " That " the said Representation and Remonstrance (in which " the said Assembly claim to themselves Rights derog- "atory to, and inconsistent with, the legislative " authority of Parliament, as declared hj the Declara- " tory Act) be brought up." By a vote of one hundred and eighty-six to sixty-seven, the Amendment was adopted ; and the amended Motion, of course, was promptly rejected, without a division.' Three days after that rejection of the Representation and Remonstrance of the General Assembly, by the House of Commons, 18, 1775] the Duke of Manchester brought the Memorial which that General Assembly had addressed to tiie House of Lords, before that House, and moved that it be read. The Earl of Dartmouth opposed the Motion ; and a spirited Debate ensued, in which the Earls of Buckingham- shire, Denbigh, Gower, Hillsborough, and Sandwich, 1 Alinon's Pui Uameiiturij lieijister, i., 4C7-47:i ; Annual Ileijinter fur 1775, " Hisfory of Europe," *llo, *116. and Lord Mansfield, supported the Minister, and the Duke of Richmond, the Earls of Shelburne and Effingham, and Lord Camden, opposed him. The only objection raised against the reading of the Memorial was the bare suspicion that " it contained " matter derogatory to the supreme legislative power " of Great Britain ;" and on that suspicion, alone, the Memorial not having been even described, the House sustained the Minister, and declined to allow the Memorial to be read, by a vote of twenty-five to forty- five, sending it, of course, into the legislative limbo. ^ Well might Edmund Burke subsequently say of that rejection of the Memorial aud of the Remonstrance of the General Assembly of Colonial New York, by the two Houses of Parliament, " nothing done in Parlia- " ment seemed to be better calculated to widen the " breach between Great Britain and the Colonies." ^ 2 Alinon's Purliattieutary ItetjUter^ ii., 152-156; Annual BcgUler for 177o, " History of Europe," *116, *117. It is a reasonable ease, in such instances as those cited and in those of the earlier historians of the American Revolution who lived and wrote in Europe, that no more than the rejection, hy the Parliament, of the two papers which were sent to that legislature hy the General Assembly of New York, was mentioned in the writings of those gentlemen ; but there is no valid excuse for those, in America, who have exhausted all their resources of misrepresentation and abuse on that General Assembly, charging it with having been everything which was detrimental to the honor or the integrity or the interests of the Colonies, and closing their respective narratives, on the subject of that Assembly, hy reciting no more than the facts, stated in the text — that its Mifiiiurial and lirmon- Mruia-c had been rejected by the two Houses of Parliament, without having been read — without having pretended to explain huw it were possible that so bad an Assen\b!y as they had described, could, by any possibility, have been, the author aud publisher of such papers as, because of their peculiarly republican averments, the Home Govern- ment and the Parliament would not allow to bo even read in their presence. Bancroft, after having consolidated the Itemomlrance aud the Meniorial, making them one paper, obliged liurke to offer both, on the same day, and in the same House, all of which were described in the narrow com- pass of four lines, without even a hint how such an Assembly as he had previously described, could have prttduced such a paper — his silence serving to screen his unfaithfulness, as a historian, both in a falsification and in a suppression of the truth. {Hislun/ nf Ihc Vniti'it tildlcit, original edition, iv.,2S(; ; Ihemnie, centenary edition, iv., .515.) John 0. Hamilton, of course, by his suppression as well as hy his falsification of the truth, in order that his father and his grandfather might he unduly eulogized, is equally untrustworthy {UisUirij of the I{e}mhlit\, i., 86.) Lendrum, tory of the Anierkiiu Iterolntion, i., 87;) "Paul Allen" (Ilistorn of the American llerolutioit, i., 237, 238;) Gordon, (Huttorij of theAmerican Rcrolu- lion, i., 500;) Ramsay, {Histoi-ji of the American Iterolntion, i., 171, 172;) and others, less prominent but not less popular, liave been equally un- faithful, as historians, in this nuitter. Lossing, {Fielil Hoolc of the Iterolntion ;) Frothingham, (Bisc- of lite IteiiuhVu- ;) Ridi)ath, {Hklorij of the Vniteil ^tatef ;) Lodge, (Histonj of the EnijILth O'lonies in America ;) Morse, (Annah of the American Iterulutiou ;) Warren, l Uistoyij of the American Jterointiou ;) and others, although abounding in facts and fictions concerning Massachusetts, have not spared a line for the recognition of what was done for "the common "cause," by the General .Assembly of the C'Jlouy of New York. Pitkin, (Huitorij of the L'nited Wii^es, i., 324, 325;) and Hildreth, (History of the Vnileil State/', First Series, iii., 56, 65,) with that fidelity to the truth which distinguished them, as historians, and notwithstanding they were New Englanders, not only recited enough of the facts to enable their respective readers to understand what the General Assembly of New York really did, but they also compared the result of those doings with the doings of the Continental Congress, very much to the credit of the former, without belittling what they regarded as also due to the latter. Annual Iteijister fir 177-'), "History of Europe," *117. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 237 Except those matters to which we have already re- ferred, nothing which requires especial notice in this narrative, occurred until, in February, 1775, the Gen- eral Assembly of the Colony rejected the Resolution, submitted by Judge Thomas, of Wcstchester-county, which provided for the election, by that General As- sembly, of Delegates to the proposed Congress of the Continent, to be held at Philadelphia, on the tenth of May ensuing, reference to which has been already made.* Four days after that determination, by the General Assembly, to take no official action on the subject referred to, \_Febritary 27, 1775,] Peter Van Brugh Livingston brought it before the " Committee "of Observation," by Avhich name the Committee of Inspection evidently preferred to be known ; and that Committee, notwithstanding its authority was limited to other and entirely different lines of duty, enter- tained and agreed to a Resolution, offered by that gentleman, " that the Committee take into Consider- "' ation, the Ways and Means of causing Delegates to " be elected, to meet the Delegates of the other Col- " onies on this Continent in General Congress, to be "held at Philadelphia, on the 10th Day of May " next." ^ If any other action on the subject of that Res- olution was taken at that time, it was not completed when the Committee adjourned ; and not until the following Wednesday, \^March 1, 1775,] at an Ad- journed Meeting of the Committee, was the subject disposed of, by ordering the publication of an Adver- tisement; addressed "to the Freeholders and Freemen " of the City and County of New York," in which were made a recital of the recommendation that another Congress should be convened at Philadel- phia, on the tenth of May ensuing ; a suggestion that an Election of Delegates " ought not longer to be de- "layed;" an acknowledgment that that Committee possessed " no Power without the Approbation of " their Constituents, to take any Measures for the " Purpose ; " and a " request " •' that the Freeholders " and Freemen of the City and County of New York, "will be pleased to assemble at the Exchange, on "Monday the (Jth Instant, at 12 o'clock, to signify " their Sense of the best Method of choosing such "Delegates; and whether they will appoint a cer- " tain Number of Persons to meet such Deputies as " the Counties may elect for that Purpose, and join " with them in appointing out of their Body Dele- " gates for the next Congress." ' That Advertisement was published on the following day, [J/cor/i 2, 1775;]* and, what was very unusual, those who were opposed to the revolutionary faction of the confederated party ot the Opposition appear to have organized, for the 1 See page .')2, ante. i I'rocf-diiigt nf thi- C"mmitti-e nf ObtmalUm for llf City nty-five in favor of the appointment of Deputies, and one hundred and sixty-three in opposition : Kivington stated the vote was nine hundred and twenty-nine, in favor, and one hundred and forty-three in opiwsition. Tiiey all agree that numy voters declined to vote — Holt and Gaine said, because their votes were seen to have been unneressary ; Kivington .said "the frien, (finding that they were not " permitted to vote for them «« Iiekgtiira) almost all declined giving " their voices at all." They, evidently suspected the managers of the movement were seeking to accomplish some mischief against those " nld fire Delegatet ;" and it maybe that Isaroper for the Meeting of " the Convention. " We forbear urging any Arguments to induce " your Concurrence, being well persuaded you are " fully sensible that the Happiness of this Colony " and the Preservation of our Rights and Liberties, " depend on our acceding to the General Union and " observing such a Line of Conduct as may be firm, " as well as Temperate. " By Order of the Committee : '• Isaac Low, Chairman.'" It is a very significant fact that, when the Com- mittee's Circuhir Letter was written and made ready for transmission to Westchester-county, there was no appearance whatever, within tiiat County, of the slightest organized opposition to either the Home or the Colonial Government; and that, among the debris of what had been conveniently regarded as a Convention of the County, assembled, in the preced- ing August, for the election of Deputies to represent the County in the late Congress, at Philadel[)hia, neither a County nor a Town Committee, actual or imixginary, remained, to bear testimony to the fact that such a Convention had ever existed, or to receive | the Committee's Circular Letter and to take action [ on its recommendation. Indeed, there can be very little doubt that the well-to-do and generally con- tented farmers, throughout that County, those who were Freeholders quite as much as those who were i only Leaseholders of properties on the various j Manors, with here and there a rare exception, had continued to gather their crops and to send them to •market, during the preceding Autumn ; to enjoy their ' This is a copy of the original publication, as it npppenred in Oaine's yeic-York Gazette and Wtcklij Mercm-t/j No. New- York, Monday, March 20. 1775. 16 usual indoor and outdoor recreations, during the pre- ceding Winter ; and to return to the labors of the season, on their farms or elsewhere, during the ear- lier weeks of the Spring, as they had done, before, year after year and generation after generation, knowing little and caring less concerning that bitter struggle for commercial gain, no matter how law- lessly conducted, or concerning that equally bitter struggle for the honors and emoluments of political place, no matter with what auxiliaries nor with what disregard of individual and social {jroprieties and of public morals that struggle should be conducted, which had kept the neighboring City and the entire seaboard in an unceasing and disgraceful turmoil, during that entire period. It is not now evident, if it ever was, that these honest, hard-working, contented men, in any portion of that unceasing and undisguised indifference to the clamor and the unblushing immorality and the audacious lawlessness of politicians, of high or of low degree, beyond the borders of the County, which they had steadily and consistently presented, were really offenders against any law, human or divine ; and it will require more evidence than has yet been pre- sented by those who have spoken or written adverse- ly concerning those quiet Westchester-county farmers and their unostentatious conservatism, to establish the fact, if it be a fact, that, regardless of that pecu- liar standing which was awarded to Westchester- county, during the period now under consideration, and regardless of the recognized manhood of those who then lived there, the " consent " of those farmers, previously given, was not quite as necessary to have warranted the invasion of their rural quiet and con- tentment, by those, not of them.selves, who were eager to thrust upon them, uninvited, new political methods, new political principles, and a new form of political government, none of which had yet secured their favor and approval, as it was, then, and as it has ever since been, assumed to have been necessary, every- where, before a political right could be disturbed or a new form of political government be established. The farmers in Westchester-county, in 1774 and 1775, were quiet men, quietly pursuing their peaceful vocations, interfering with no one, and avoiding the interference of others. They were not political in their aims or inclinations ; they had very clearly manifested, over and over again, their disinclination to be associated, in any degree, with those who were inclined to become, if they had not already become, politicians; and, as will be seen, in their action, dur- ing the Winter, and in their subsequent actions, under similar circumstances, they were not inclined to be crowded into any political associations, without their consent, without presenting, at least, an open, a man- ly, and a vigorous opposition. The reader will de- termine for himself, therefore, how much, if any, there was of individual and social propriety, and how- much, if any, there was of consideration for the wtl- 242 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. fare of those farmers or for that of the Colony, dis- severed from all other considerations, in the Com- mittee of Inspection, alias the Committee of Obser- vation, for the City and County of New York — a merely local organization, vested with no more than the barest local authority, and that confined, exclu- sively, to an entirely different service — when it thrust itself, unasked and undesired, into the midst of that peaceful and peacefully inclined community, only in order to disturb that prevailing peace by marshalling those who composed that rural coiumunity into rival parties, embittered against each other, without any aim or purjjose in which they were, or in which they were likely to become, in the slightest degree interested, and for nothing else than for the promotion of individual aims and for the advancement to politi- cal place and authority, of aspiring politicians who were not always entitled, by their individual integrity, to any such advancement, anywhere. As we have said, there was no Town or County Committee, within Westchester-county, unto whom the Chairman of New Y'ork's Committee of Inspec- tion could send the Committee's Circular Letter, to which reference has been made ; and other than usual means, therefore, were necessarily resorted to, to se- cure for it even a nominal circulation, within that County. It is not, now, known, beyond a peradven- ture, just what means were thus employed; but the copies of that insidious Circular Letter which were intended for residents of Westchester-county were evidently sent to a leading Westchester-county poli- tician ; and, by him, whomsoever he may have been, they were so manipulated that they reached only those residents of the County who would most surely promote the political purposes of that particular Westchesterian who had been thus entrusted with the delivery of them.' 1 We have preferred to consider that there was an intermediate agen- cy, between the Chairman of tlie New York Committee and the several Westcliester county gentlemen into whose hands his Circnlar Letters eventnally fell, because those gentlemen were mainly residents of the town of Westchester and of the neighboring village of New Rochelle ; because there was nothing, in that Circular Letter, which designated any time or place of meeting, for any Caucus or other Assemblage which might be considered necessary, for the particular purposes mentioned in that Circular Letter ; because, only on the warrant of that particular Circular Letter, explicitly stated by them, a dozen men, from at least four different Towns, spontaneously came together, at the same time, in a distant Town in which none of them lived, and on the same errand. Not one of the number was from Towns lying northward from the White Plains ; not one had come from all the country lying westward from the Bronx-river ; there was not present either a Van Cortlandt or a Thom- as, already w^^U-known popular loaders, either of whom would have been formidable, as a rival, against any new aspirant for the leadership of the movement and the spoils of office to which that movement tended. There was present, however, one who had, previously, been politically dormant ; by whom the machinery of the movement was evidently run ; and by whom, subsequently, as will be hereafter seen, entirely through its instruujentality, a place was secured for himself, in the Congress of the Continent, and an opening made for the accession to office and aris- tocratic consequence and inHuence, of others of liis wide-spread family. It will have been seen, by every attentive reader, that, very evidently, Isaac Low's paclcage of Circular Letters, intended for circuhition in On the twenty-eighth of March, Theodosius Bar- tow, Esq., James Willis, and Abraham Guiou, Esq., all of New Rochelle ; William Sutton, Esq., of Ma- maroneck'-'; Colonel Lewis Morris, Thomas Hunt, and Abraham Leggett, of Westchester ; Captain Joseph Drake, Benjamin Drake, Moses Drake, and Stephen Ward, of East Chester; and James Horton, Junior, Esq., of Rye,^ all of them, it said, "having received " letters from the Chairman of the City and County " of New York, relative to the appointment of Depu- "ties for this County," to a proposed Provincial Con- vention, "met at the White-Plains, for the purpose ot "devising means for taking the Sense of the County " upon the Subject." At best, that meeting of local politicians, or ot those who were not indisposed to become politicians, from the south-eastern Towns of the County, no mat- ter by what means they had been induced to go to the White Plains, on that particular March morning, on such an unusual errand, was nothing more nor less than a Caucus of those who were known or supposed to have been in the interest of the Morris family and to have favored the aspirations of those members ot that family who hankered after official place and au- thority. Neither Yonkers, nor Greenburgh, nor any of the Towns to the northward of tliem and of the White Plains, were in the slightest degree represented in that important assemblage; and every one who had previou.sly appeared as a leader of the farmers of the County, in their very unfrequent political doings, re- gardless of party associations, appears to have been, also, very carefully excluded, not improbably for the purpose of securing that harmonious action, in a pre- ordained direction, which the presence of older and more experienced rivals might have turned toward some other part of the County than toward the Manor of Morrisania. The Caucus undoubtedly discharged all the duties which its controlling spirit assigned to it — it took into consideration, after a fashion of its own creation, the subject of the proposed election of Delegates to rep- resent the County, or to assume to do so ; and it "agreed to send the following Notification to the "principal Freeholders in the different Towns and " Districts in the County," the designation of whom, Westchester-county, was entrusted to Lewis Morris, of Morrisania, in the Borough Town of Westchester, a brother-in-law of Isaac Wilkins, of that Town, with the last-named of whom, as the leader of the majority ot the General Assembly of the Colony, the reader has been already made acquainted. In all that had previously been said or done, in behalf of the Colony, in its dispute with the Home Government, not a Morris had been heard, except in that instance when one of them described the unfranchised masses of the Colonists as " poor reptiles" {vide Page 188, ante); but the fragrance of the distant emoluments and influences of office, more fully developed than ever before, had passed over from the City into Westches- ter-county ; and, reasonably enough to all who knew of the greed for of- fice which every Morris of every period had possessed, both Lewis and Gouverneur, to say nothing of others, were no longer torpid and in- different. 2 Subsequently distinguished as Loyalists. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 243 in that selection, having been left to hiiu by whom the Caucus had evidently been controlled — and hav- ing, in behalf of somebody else more than in behalf of the body of the County, thus put the political ma- chinery in motion, satisfactorily to themselves and to their chief, the twelve gentleman waded through the 8pring-tiinc mud, back, to their respective homes. The "Notification" to which reference has been made, that which the Caucus authorized to be sent to the elect, among the Freeholders of the County, was in these words : "March 28th, 1775. '• Sir : "A number of gentlemen from different districts in " the county of Westchester having this day met at " the White Plains to Consider of the most proper " method of taking the Sense of the Freeholders, of " the Said County, upon the Expediency of choosing " Dei)uties to meet the Deputies of the other Coun- " ties, for the purpose of Electing delegates to repre- " sent this Colony in the General Congress to be held " at Philadelphia on the 10th of May next, are of " opinion that the best way of proceeding for that " purpose, will be to have a general Meeting of the " Freeholders of the Said County. " As this County is very Extensive we take the " liberty of recommending the meeting to be held at " the White Plains on Tuesday the 11th day of April " next at ten o'clock in the forenoon at the Court " House, and therefore do desire you, to give notice " of the Same to all the freeholders in your district, " without exception, as those who do not appear and " vote on that day, will be presumed to acquiesce in " the Sentiment of the majority of those who vote. " We are &c." ^ There can be no good reason for supposing that that Caucus failed to employ the best means which it could control, to secure the attendance, at the ap- pointed place, on the appointed day, and at the des- ignated hour, of all those of the farmers of the Coun- ty of Westchester, whom it supj)osed to have been friendly to the Morris family, and who were willing or who could be induced to accept the head of that wealthy and aristocratic, but really unpopular, family, as their political leader — to that family, the slake was a very important one ; and, to secure that stake, it played desperately. On the other hand, those of the inhabitants of the County who were conservative in their political opinions, and those who were not favor- ers of the new-born, but selfish, zeal of the Lord of ' Tliis narrative of the organization and doings of that notable Caucus, including the copy of the " Stitifli-ulioii " \vhii:li w as issued, by ita au- thority, is based on the elaborate paper, signed by "Lewis Morris, " tVioiniKKi," which served as the Credentials of those who appeared in the Provincial Convention, as Deputies from Westchester-county, and winch is preserved in the Crftlmtiah t>f ] h'Utjttten^ UiMnrifnl MmuifirrljitH rfliiliinj III llii- H'.ii- or' llii- ItrioliiliMi — Volume xxiv., Page 23— in the Ollice of the Secretary of State, at Alt any. The "Siitifimlim," as printed in the text, was copied from the original Manuscript. the Manor of Morrisania, were aroused ; and, especi- ally in the Borough Town of Westchester, within which the ancestral home of the Morrises was situat- ed, the ambitious purjjoscs of that geutleman and of his family were empathically snubbed, by a Meeting of his townsmen, duly summoned to take into consi- deration " whether or not they should choose Deputies " to represent them at a Provincial Convention." Be- sides that local and evidently personal rebuke, by the townsmen of the Morrises, the great body of "the " Freeholders and Inhabitants of the County of West- " Chester," or such of them as were " friends of Gov- " ernment and our hapjjy Constitution," was earnestly appealed to, in the circulation of the following stirring Address : " To (he Freeholders and Inhabitants of the County of Westchester. " New -York, April 6, 1775. " You are earnestly desired to attend a general " meeting of the county, to be held at the White " Plains, on Tuesday next, the 11th inst. to give your " votes upon the questions : — " Whether you are inclined to choose deputies to "meet at the city of New-York, in a Provincial Con- "vention? Or, " Whether you are determined to abide by the " loyal and judicious measures already taken by your " own worthy representatives in the general assembly " of this province, for a redress of American grievances? "The conse(]uences that may arise from your ne- "glecting to attend at the White Plains, on Tuesday "next, to declare your sentiments relative to the ap- "pointment of deputies to meet in Provincial Con- "gress, may be very fatal to this county; the friends " of goverment, and our happy constitution, are there- " fore earnestly invited in person, to oj)pose a measure "so replete with ruin and misery. Remember the " extravagant ])rice we are now obliged to pay for "goods purchased of the merchants, in consequence "of the Non-Imj)ortation agreement; and when the " NON-EXPORTATION agreement takes place, we " shall be in the situation of those who were obliged " to make bricks without straw. " A WHITE OAK."' - "A Correspondent aciiuaints us. That, on Monday the 3d of March, "the Inhabitants of the Borough of Westchester met, in Consequence of " a Summons, to give their Sentiments upon a Qiiesti ^n, whether or not "they would choose Deputies to represent them at a Provincial Conveu- " tiou in this City ; when they declared themselves already very ably "and efleotually repre>iented in the General Assembly of this Province, "by Isaac Wilkins, E8(|uire ;* peremptorily disowned aH'Cougrossional "Conventions and Committees, most loyally repeating the old Chonis, " (iod save the King, which was seconded by three heaity Cheers ; and '• then the jolly Freeholders and Inhabitants spent the Day with great " Hilarity and good Humour over their Tankards and Bowls."— (Oaine's Xt'W'York iliizettf, anil the Week-li/ Mercurif^ No. 12'JG, New-Yobk, JIoneal, an exact copy of the original, was printed in Uirinijlua' t Siir-York Gtizetleer, No. 103, New-Yobk, Thursday, April 6, 1775. *The wife of Isaac Wilkins was Isabella Morris, sister of Oouvemeiir and half-sister of Colonel Lewis Morris, the head of tliat family. 244 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. It is reasonable to suppose that many of the farm- ers of Westuhester-county, whatever their political opinions may have been, were nlore than usually ex- cited by these extraordinary appeals and by others which have not been preserved, addressed to them by those whom they had hitherto regarded as leaders in political affairs ; but it is equally clear that not even those extraordinary means, thus employed, were suc- cessful in withdrawing even a respectable minority of the Freeholders, to say nothing of those heads of families who were not Freeholders, who, at that time, inhabited that extensive and thickly settled County, from their homesteads and from the urgent duties, at home, which the opening Spring had imposed upon them. Notwithstanding all the reasons which ex- isted for their continued attention to their respective home duties, however, there were some, relatively a small proportion, of either party, those who were op- posed to the Morrises and to the proposition to elect Deputies to a proposed Convention of the Colony and those who favored both, who went to the Plains, on that Tuesday morning, the eleventh of April, as, re- spectively, they had been requested to go. They went, as farmers were wont to go and as they continue to go, on such occasions, on horseback or on foot, over Westchester-county's Spring-time muddy roads or " across lots," as best suited their individual con- venience; and the little Village, what there was of it, scattered along the wide spread Post-road, was un- doubtedly, the scene of many a discussion, friendly or unfriendly, as friend met friend or neighbor met neighbor in that ancient thoroughfare, each intent, as farmers only can be intent, on the promotion of the particular cause to which each had become especially devoted. Reasonably enough, the two Taverns which were, then, prominent within the limits of the Vil- lage, were made the stopping-jjlaces of those rural incomers unto whom no Village householder had ex- tended a Village welcome. Captain Hatfield, the land- lord of one of those Taverns, entertaining those who were opposed to the Morrises and to the proposed election of Deputies, while those Avho favored that family and that proposed election, " put up in another " Public House in the Town," probably that which was kept by Isaac Oakley.^ 1 Protest of the Tuhabitavts and Freeholders of Westchesfer-countij, Xeir- Torh, "CorNTY or Westchesteb, April 13, 1775," published in liivington' s New-York Gazetteer, No. 105, New York, Thursday, April 20, 1775; and in Gaine's New-Y'/rk Gazette : and the Weekly Mercury, No. 1227, New York, Monday, .^pril 17, 1775. We have been favored by our unwearied friends, Hon. Lewis C. Piatt and Hon. J. 0. Dyknian with information, concerning these two Tav- erns, which our reader-s will find worthy of their remembrance. Captain Hatfield's Tavern stood almost clue South from the old Court- house, and nearly half a mile distant, on the North side of the OLD stage- road to New York, — the line of that road has boon changed, since 1775 — on property more recently owned by Samuel E. Lyon, Esq., and now by the heirs of the late Alfred Waller, Esq. The old building has been removed from the place on which it stood, in 1775, to a place, further to the northward, not far from the site of the old Court-house ; ami is now occupied as a tenement. Isaac Oakley's Tavern stood on the East side of the old stage-road. It is evident that neither of the two factions was very punctual in its attendance, at the appointed hour — a practice which is continued to this day, in Westchester-county, on similar occasions — and, for a reason which was perfectly obvious, the promoters of the proposed Meeting, very evidently, were not in a hurry to assume the great responsibility of carrying forward the schemes of the revolutionary faction in the City of New York, to which they had been invit- ed, especially in view of the greater number of those who were opposed to those schemes, and who were present and apparently prepared to oppose them ; while those who were opposed to the Morrises and to their schemes and to the pro- posed election, and whose evidently superior numbers had served to dampen the ardor of their op- ponents, could do nothing else than to wait, and to watch the progress of events. Notwithstanding the hour of ten had been named in the Notification through which the assembled farmers had thus met, it was nearly noon before any attempt to organize a Meeting was made — probably, some whose presence was desired and expected, had not arrived; probably, those leaders of the movement who were present were, meanwhile, " comparing notes," and arranging plans of action, and enjoying that social glass, frequently renewed, of which their Chairman subsequently made mention, unwittingly ; most probably, the superior numbers of those who were known to be opposed to them, whose strength of numbers was being con- stantly increased, warned the ambitious Lord of the Manor of Morrisania and his adherents that "the "better part of Valor is — Discretion." About twelve o'clock, however, those who favored the Morrises and the proposed election of Deputies appear to have quietly and noiselessly left the Tav- ern, passed over the old post-road, and re assembled in the Courthouse; organized a Meeting; and ap- pointed Colonel Lewis Morris, its Chairman. It was done quietly, if it was not done secretly : it was done quietly, without inviting any others than those of their own faction, to assemble with them : it was done quietly and in a manner which clearly indicated that something else than an untrammeled and un- biased expression of the will of all those who were present — carrying with it, also, the assumed acquies- cence of all those who were not present — concerning the Morrises and the questions which were pro- pounded in the Notification, was chiefly desired, and must be procured, "by fair means or by foul :" most evidently, it was done, quietly, with an inclination and a hope that it might accomplish all the purposes of directly opposite to the old Court-house. We remember the old house, very distinctly, having often seen it and, more than once, at least forty years ago, having slept under its roof. It is said that it was burned, about 1808 ; and tiiat the site remains unoccupied. T)ie old Court-house, the scene of many an adventure during the later Colonial era, occupied the site of the present residence of W. P. Fiero, Esq., on the West side of the stage-road to New York. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 245 those who had originated aiul promoted it, secretly and rapidly, without alarming those who were assem- bled at Captain Hatfield's, and before they could be brought to the Courthouse, to defeat those purposes and to relegate the Morrises to that political obscur- ity iu which, very ungraciously, they had so long and so ingloriously rested. It was, in short, nothing else than a political coup-de-main; but, unfortunately for the honor of those who participated in it, it was not as respectably successful as those who had contrived it, had desired. ' Intelligence of the movement of their opponents very soon reached those who were assembled at Cap- tain Hatfield's Tavern ; and. we are told that, un- doubtedly with very little delay, they, also, " walked " down to the Courthouse, although not half of their " friends who were expected had yet appeared." At that time, when the full force of all who thus pre- sumed to act, in so vital a question, in the name of all who were, then, in Westchester-county — and that, too, without any delegation of authority and, cer- tainly, without any exi)ressed "consent" — was un- doubtedly present and acting, there was not present more than from a hundred to a hundred and twenty- five, Freeholders and others ; and there is evidence that quite as large a number, Freeholders and others, walked down to the Courthouse, from Captain Hat- field's Tavern, and strii)])ed all the novelty and all there was of what was said to have been integrity from the exposed and unsuccessful coup-de-main.'^ The individual respectability of none of these, of either faction, appears to have been imjjeached by any one ; but Colonel Morris subsequently attemi)ted to depre- ciate tlie political standing of som&of those who were ' From the fact that the Meeting had been organized and "had already "entered upon tlic business uf tlie day," before it waa known to those who were at Hatfield's Tavern, that any movement toward sucli an or- ganization had been made— a fact w liich was openly stated in the IVuU fl of tlie one faction witliout having been controverted in the elaborate re- ply of the Chairman of the Meeting —the secrecy of the niovenjeut is es- tablished, beyond a question. The motives of those who contrived that particular mode of operations, will be manifest to all who are ac(iuainted with the facts and with the practices of unscrupulous politicians, in Westchester-county as often aa elsewhere. -In the narrative which the Chairman of the Meeting prepared, ini- mediately after the adjournment of that Meeting, he stated that "a very " numerous body of the Freeholders of the County assembled at the "Court House;" and that "an inconsiderable number of Persons "( among whom were many tenants not entitled to a vote) with Isaac " Wilkins, Esq., and Col. I'hilii)se at their head, then appeared." In the I'rolesI of llie Iiilmhilinitu and Fncholdi rs, subsequently published, it is stated, specifically, that when those from Captain llatfleld's Tavern en- tered the Courthouse, ".the numbers on each side seemed tube nearly " equal ; and both together might amount to two hundred or, at most, "two hundrod and fifty." Nearly a month after the publication of that ProUsI, and after he had secured the seat in the Continental Congress for which he ba'«m there was, in such a crowd, no matter for whom it hurrahed ; and liow small tlie price was with w-hich that crowd had been purchased, to further the purposes of either "the friends of the Government" or those of the revolutionary faction— may he not be enabled to understand, also, something more of those who originated and fostered the revolu- tionary spirit, in the Colonies, and something more of the means which they employed, call them what you may, than those, claiming to be " historians," with a very few really honorable exceptions, have hitlier- to told to him ? One of the most important political movements in wliicb Xew York Although no action, on that subject, appears to have been taken by the Meeting, its master-spirit and Chairman, in his official capacity, appears to have continued the work for which the Meeting had been convened, completing it before he left the White Plains, by preparing an official narrative of the ori- gin of the Meeting ; of the Caucus which had " recom- " mended " it; of its Proceedings, when convened; and of its noisy loyalty to that " gracious Sove- " reign " whose recognized authority it had so boldly assailed. That narrative was duly published ; and, at the e.xpense of repeating some matters of which mention has been already made, as an important portion of the historical literature of Westchester- county, a place is made for it, in this work. It was in the following words : " White Plains, ix the County of AVestchestfr " the 11th day of April 1775. "On the 28th day of March last, the following " Gentlemen having received letters from the Chair- " man of the Committee of the City and County of " New-York relative to the appointment of Deputies " for this County, met at this place for the purpose of " devising means for taking the Sense of this County " upon the Subject, viz : " Col. Lewis Morris, Theodosiiis Barlow, Esq., * " Thomas Hunt, William Sutton, Esq., " Abraham Leggot, Capt. Joseph Drake, " James Horton, Jr., Esq., James Willis, " Stephen Ward, Benjamin Drake, " Abraham Guion, Esq., Moses Drake, " who having taken the Same into consideration, "agreed to send 'the following notification to the "principal freeholders in the different Towns and " districts in the County, viz — " ' March 28th, 1775. " ' Sir. a number of gentlemen from different dis- " ' tricts in the county of Westchester having this " ' day met at the White Plains to Consider of the " ' most proper method of taking the Sense of the " ' Freeholders, of the said County, upon the Expedi- '' ' ency of choosing Deputies to meet the Deputies of " ' the other Counties, for the purpose of Electing has ever been engaged, was carried through Westchester-county in known opposition to the great body of its inhabitants, and in the face of a formal Protest of a larger number, by only a factional minority, in the interest of an aspiring politician, and while that minority was stag- gering under the evil influences of the New England Bum which had been freely dispensed, for that particular purpose. 3 The narrative, signed by " Lewis Morris, C/ni/rni/iii," already re- ferred to, ha« afforded a sufficient authority, for all that has been said, in the text, concerning the Meeting, after the protestants had left the Courthouse. *.\lthough the name was thus written, in the original manuscript, there can be no doiibt that reference was made to Theounty, for the present, was not further disturbed ; although it is scarcely possible that every one continued, thenceforth, to regard all his neighbors with the same friendly feelings which had bound them togeth- er, during the past. While the Meeting at the Courthouse was thus quietly engaged in the continued disciiarge of " the " business of the day," those who had protested, before it, against the call for the Meeting as well as against its proposed proceedings, returned to Captain Hat- field's Tavern, where they were joined, during the afternoon, by " many of their friends ;" and "they • In some of tlio re-prints of tliis paper, tliis word is calleJ " quietlj' : " we have i>referre(i to use the word which was used by the author, iu the original niainiscript. - Tliis is an exiict copy of the original manuscript, which was used as the Credentials of the Deputies and has been preserved in the t'redtnlialt of Iteletjttltn, \'oluine xxiv., Page Jo, Jlixturii-nt Mitum^rrijitu rehui»; Hildreth's Htxlurij < if the I'liiteil States, First Series, iii., 72 ; etc. Judge Jones, {HUton/ nf Xeic Vwt, i., 38, 39,') strangely supposed the Members to the Congress were elected by the several Counties — those from the City of New York, at that promiscuous mass Meeting, at the Exchange, of which an account has been already presented. Bancroft, with all the authorities' licfore him. {Hixlnrii of the I'tiile'l Slates, original edition, vi., 283 ; the smue, centenary edition, iv., ^t\3,) made all " the ru- " ral Counties," without exception, "co-operate with the City, " in elect- ing the Deputies, although Richmond, all of Queens except two Towns, Tyron, Cumberland and Charlotte-counties, made no pretension so send Deputies. lie said, also, that all the members of the former Congress, "except the luke-warm Isaac Low, " were re-elected : both Isaac Low and John Haring, both of them members of that Congress, declineil re- elections, notwithstanding the Convention desired to return them. Lossing, i,Fi« Iil-y.'"«t nj the Ue, „liitum, ) appears to have reganled the action of Kew York, concerning the second Congress, as too insignificant to be worthy of even a {Kissing allusion. and of those who were retiring from that place ; * the destruction of the Provincial stores, at Concord; the collision of the raiders with the excited Colonists, while on their retreat, from Concord to Boston ; the disastrous result of that retreat ; the intense excite- ment into which the entire Continent was consequent- ly plunged ; the entire disregard of the Royal author- ity, in the City of New York, which immediately followed ; the temporary fortification of the pass, at Kingsbridge ; and the control, within the City, which the Committee of Inspection necessarily a.s.sumed, are, all of them, matters of history, known to all intelli- gent persons, and need not be repeated, in this place. The intelligence of that commencement of military operations, in the field, was received in the City of New York, on Sunday, the twenty-third of April ;^ and, at a Meeting of the Committee of Inspection, on the following Wednesday, that body, among other proceedings, resolved that "this Committee is further "unanimously of opinion, that, at the present alarm- " ing juncture, it is highly advisable that a Provincial " Congress be immediately summoned ; and that it be " recommended to the Freeholders and Freemen of " this City and County, to choose, at the same time "that they vote for the new Committee aforesaid," " twenty Deputies to represent them at the said Con- " gress ; and that a Letter be forthwith prepared and " despatched to all the Counties, requesting them to " unite with us in forming a Provincial Congress, and " to appoint their Deputies without delay, to meet at " New York, on Monday, the twenty-second of May " next." ' * Notwithstanding the unaccountable display of armed men, on tho Green, no attempt whatever was made, by any of them, to ojipoae the march of the Royal Tri)ops ; and when they were ordered to disperse, they did disperse, all of them seeking safety in running away, as fast as they could go. While they were thus running away, the Royal troops opened a fire on them, with tlis result which is known to the wcrld. It is positively and authoritatively stated, that, with the ex- ception, the only exception, of one, who, when " he was at some "distance" — out of harm's way — turned and "gave them the guts "of his gun," not a single gun was tired by the Colonists. Those curious to learn more on that subject — that " Battle " in which one of the parties did all the firing, and the other all the KUNMNt; — may find the testimony in Dawson's Jlnttles of the I'nited Stateif hij Sea and Ijmd^ .\rticle "Lexix(;ton C'o.vcoBn;" Force's American Archives, Fourth Series, ii., 489-601 ; etc. 5 The most grapliic account of the proceedings, in the City of New- Y'ork, on that memorable Sunday, as far as we have knowledge of the subject, is that presented by Judge Jones, in his Hittunj o f Xeic York diirinij the ReroUilionnni War, (i., 39-41.) <> The Committee of Inspection had recommended the dissolution of that Committee, because it was invested with [wwers respecting only the " ,Uxocm/i")j " of the Continental CiSea- bury nor Luke Babcock had written anything con- cerning the political questions of that period ; ' it was not thought they would do so; and there was no other person, in Westchester-county, whose pen promised trouble to the new-made leader, no matter how much that peculiar failing which had made his family conspicuous, throughout the Colony,'- should be manifested in whatever he should write. The relative merits of the two papers, the Declara- tion and Protest and the reply, will be very readily seen, by every careful reader. The author of the latter was very profuse in his very general charge of "falsities contained in this representation;" but he failed to specify, even a single instance in which the former had presented an untruth ; and every one will perceive that he did not except, from the general im- peachment, even those portions of the Declaration and Protest which agreed, in their recital of facts, with his own statement of those facts, contained in the official report of the proceedings of that Meeting, at the White Plains, written over his own signature, on the afternoon of the day on which the Meeting was held, and subsequently presented by him, to the Provincial Convention, as the Credentials through which he and his associates were admitted to seats in that body, as, nominally, a delegation from West- chester-county — if the recital contained in the one was untruthful, therefore, the similar recital con- tained in the other was, necessarily, quite as untrust- worthy as the other. He also impeached the " de- "cency" of what the Declaration and Protest con- tained; but, again, he failed to specify in what their " indecency " consisted. He impeached the bona Jide of the " enthusiasm " of the protestants, at the Plains ; but he " confessed," and only those who are guilty •'confess," that his own companions, those who had given the much coveted place and authority to him, were also noisy, from the effects of otlier Spirits than that of loyalty to the King — inasmuch as each of the two factions, at the Plains, claimed to have been noisy as well as loyal, the author of the reply had little reason for making such an objection, unless he desired to secure to his own faction the credit of making all the noise and of expressing all the loyalty which were then produced, by any one. He ob- 1 Mr. Seabury; in hia Memorial lo the General Assembly of Connecticut, presented on the twentieth of December, 1775, in reply to one of the four accusations which had been made against him, expressly stated that he had not, at that time, written any "pamphlets and newspapers "against the liberties of America ;" which effsctually disproves much that has been written, on that subject, by modern bibliographers. 2" This family are so remarkabU for ^enlarging the truth,^ that all "stories suspected of not being true are known throughout the County " of Westchester, in the City of Xew York, and on the westernmost part "of Long Island, by the name of ' Morrisanias.'" — (Jones's History of Xew York during the Sevolulionary War, i., 140.) jected, also, that the titles of those who had signed the Declaration and Protest were appended to the names of those to whom they respectively belonged ; but a reference to the official report of the proceed- ings of that Meeting, signed by himself and evidently from his own pen, to which reference has been made, will show to any one that the specific titles of " Mr. , " " Esq., " " Captain," " Major," and " Colonel," were added to eighteen of the twenty-six names which that report contained — indeed, he had given the distinctive title of "Colonel," to himself, in three different places, in that report ; and that, too, with- out a word of apology. He insinuated that one hun- dred and seventy of those who had signed the Protest were not voters — " alter the most diligent inquiry, " I cannot find they have the least pretensions to "vote," he said ; adding, " and indeed, many of them "are lads under age" — but he conveniently omitted to make a direct and positive averment of such a want of qualification, in anyone of those protestants ; and he also conveniently failed to designate which of the one hundred and seventy whom he named, in any single instance, was a minor. Most of all, he disre- garded the fact that the Declaration and Protest, to which he assumed to make a reply, had made no pre- tension to having been made exclusively by " Free- " holders," but, on the contrary, it was thus headed : " We the subscribers, freeholders and inhabitants of "the county of Westchester, having assembled at the " White Plains, in consequence of certain advertise- " ments," etc., from which every appearance of ex- clusiveness, in the signers of it, was expressly ex- cluded. Finally : he impeached the " independence " of those of the signers of that Protest who were Free- holders, by saying " many also hold lands at will un- "der Col. Philips; " but he conveniently forgot to tell how a mere tenant at will could, thereby, become a Freeholder, or how many, in the Manor of Cortlandt, who were only tenants or who held lands at the will of the Proprietors of that Manor, had been induced by other causes than loyalty to those Proprietors or discontent with the General Assembly, to go to the White Plains, to assist into a place in the revolu- tionary organization, the young member of that " patriotic " family, Philip, on whom, a few months before, the Royal Governor, William Tryon, had bestowed a Royal Commission of Major, which he then bore ; nor was it convenient for the author of that reply, to state, therein, just how many of the tenants and other retainers of the lordly Lord of the Manor of Morrisania had been induced, contrary to their unassisted inclinations, to ride from the Borough Town of Westchester to the White Plains, on that eleventh of April, to assist in the elevation of himself into an office, no matter what. The char- acter of Colonel Frederic Philipse, whom he was so swift to impeach, whether regarded as a man or as a gentleman, as a landlord or as a citizen, was quite as pure, and quite as upright, and quite as worthy of THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 257 respect, as was that of Colonel Lewis Morris or that of any other member of that unpopular family ; and his practises, in private and in public life, against which not even a Morris, in his bitterest mood, could say a word of open disrespect, merited no such fling from the office-seeking head of the small, new-born revolu- tionary faction, then in Westchester-county — from one whose only antiigonism to the Colonial and Home Governments originated in and was sustained by the continued ill-success of the family of which he was the head, in it« unceasing hankering for that official station from which, except in a single notorious in- stance, the controlling power within the Colony, for many years, had rigidly excluded it. At the same time, and through the same public press in which Lewis Morris published his reply to the Declaration and Protest, to which reference has been made, he also published the following Cards,' evidently the only trophies of the kind, which he had secured, during the political campaign in which he had been engaged, since the publication of the Decla- ration and Protest had aroused his indignation, and the withdrawal of his brother-in-law had left him without an opponent : I " rphat our names were not subscribed to the 1 " protest of West-Chester, either by our- " selves, or our orders or permission, directly or indi- " rectly, is certified by us, each for himself " Peter Bussing. "Peter Bussing, jun. " May 4, 1775." II "Mr. Rivington, " I Did sign a protest, which was printed in your " paper ; but I did so, because I was told that the in- " tent of signing it was to shew, that I was for the " liberties of the country. " Samuel Baker." Ill " North-Castle, May 8, 1775. " Mr. Rivington, " rN your paper lately I saw my name to a pro- J. " test. I never signed it, but went into Capt. " Hatfield's house, and wsis asked, whether I was a " Whig or a Tory ? I made answer, that I did not " understand the meaning of those words, but was for " liberty and peace. Upon which somebody put down ^ Bici)tglon't Xew-Tork GmeUeer,J^o.lOS, New-Yoek, Thursday, May 11, 1775. Any one who is acquainted with the habits of printers, in " making ".up " the forms of a newspaper, for the press, will understand, from the places which these three Cards, and the reply of Lewis Morris to the Declaration aitd Protest (omitting the names), and the proceedings of the Meeting at the White Plains — five distinct articles relating to Westches- ter-county — occupy, together, in the last Column of the inside form of the paper, that they all proceeded from the same hand ; and that the three Cards of recanting protesters were, evidently, among the results of Lewis Morris's political pilgrimage through that County, in his dili- gent search for protestants who were not, also, Freeholders. 17 " my name. Now, Sir, I desire that you will print " this to shew to the world, that I have not deserved " to be held up in the light of a protestor. "Jeremiah Hunter." With these four publications — the reply to the Dcc- laration and Protest and the three Cards of recanta- tion — as far as Westchester-county was concerned, the literature of the first Provincial Convention of the Colony of New York ended — and, as every farmer had returned to his rural home, at the close of the eventful eleventh of April, and had resumed his work, the necessary work of the season, on his farm or on the river, with the exceptions, here and there, of a disturbed mind, an angry thought, or an unneighborly resent- ment, new features in the social life of Westchester- county farmers, the whole subject gradually became a thing of the past, fit only for material for history. Reference has been made to the action of the Com- mittee of Inspection, in the City of New York, on the twenty-sixth of April, providing for its own dis- solution ; for the election of a new Committee of one hundred, to occupy its place, in that City ; and for the organization of a Provincial Congress, with gen- eral authority for the government of the entire Col- ony.' For the accomplishment of the last-named of those purposes, a Circular Letter was addressed, by the Chairman of that Committee, to the Committees of those Counties in which Committees had been chosen, and to prominent residents of those Counties in which Committees had not been chosen, inviting their co-operation, and recommending them to choose Deputies to the proposed Congress, the following being a copy of that Circular Letter : "CIRCULAR. " Committee Chamber, New-York, April 28, 1775. " Gentlemen, "The distressed and alarming situation of our " Country, occasioned by the sanguinary measures "adopted by the British Ministry, (to enforce which, " the Sword has been actually drawn against our " brethren in the Massachusetts), threatening to " involve this Continent in all the horrors of a civil " War, obliges us to call for the united aid and council "of the Colony, at this dangerous crisis. "Most of the Deputies who composed the late " Provincial Congress, held in this City, were only "vested with powers to chose Delegates to represent " the Province at the next Continental Congress, " and the Convention having executed that trust " dissolved themselves : It is therefore thought "adviseable by this Committee, that a Provincial "Congress be immediately summoned to deliberate "upon, and from time to time to direct such measures " as may be expedient for our common safety. "We persuade ourselves, that no argumen's can > 7id< Pa^ 2Sl, oHff . 258 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " now be wanting to evince the necessity of a perfect " union ; and we know of no method in which "the united sense of the people of the province can " be collected, but the one now proposed. We there- " fore entreat your County heartily to unite in the " choice of proper persons to represent them at a " Provincial Congress to be held in this City on the " 22d of May next. — Twenty Deputies are proposed " for this City, and in order to give the greater weight " and influence to the councils of the Congress, we " could wish the number of Deputies from the "counties, may be considerable. " We can assure you, that the appointment of a "Provincial Congress,' approved of by the inhabitants " of this city in general, is the most proper and " salutary measure that can be adopted in the present " melancholy state of this Continent ; and we shall be " happy to find, that our brethren in the different "Counties concur with us in opinion. " By order of the Committee. " Isaac Low, Chairman." ^ As there was not, at that time, any Committee, within the County of Westchester, unto whom that Circular Letter could be sent, it was probably sent, as that relating to the proposed Provincial Convention had been sent, to some prominent resident of that County, most convenient to the Chairman of the Committee of the City, for circulation in the several Towns, throughout the County ; and, by that local poli- tician, whomsoever he may have been, it may be reasona- bly supposed that those Circular Letterswhich were thus sent to him, were duly circulated " where they would " do the most good," for his own interest and for those of his family. It is said, however, that " a general "notice," inviting a Meeting of the Freeholders of the County, was published; and history has recorded, over the official signature of the "Chairman for the " day," that such a Meeting was held, at the White Plains, on Monday, the eighth of May, 1775, " pur- "suant to a general notice for that purpose," James Van Cortlandt, of the Borough Town of Westchester, occupying the Chair. No pretensions were made, in the official report of the Meeting or elsewhere, that the attendance was large: on the contrary, it is very probable that not more than two dozens were present. Whatever the number may have been, it assumed to be the representative of all who were, then, within the County, of every condition in life ; and, in the name and in behalf of all those who then lived therein, whether present or absent, it appointed " a Committee " of ninety persons, for the said County," and de- 1 It will be noticed that the proposed assembly was, in this Circular Letter, called a "Provincial Congress," not a " Convention," as the last was named. - The re-print of this Circular Letter, in the text, is made from a care- fully-made copy of one of the originals, which has been preserved amon^ Associations in the Historical Majiuscrijjls relating to the War of the Revolution, in the Secretary of State's Office, at Albany, Volume XXX., Page 182. termined that any twenty of them, "should be "impowered to act for the said County; " and it also determined to send a Deputation to the proposed Provincial Congress, referring to the new-appointed Committee of the County, the nomination of those who should be members of that Deputation. There were only twenty-three of the ninety who had been named for the Committee, present and act- ing on the subject which had been referred to it; but it was not slow in nominating, " to represent the said "County in Provincial Convention," Gouverneur Morris, Doctor Robert Graham, Colonel Lewis Graham, and Colonel James Van Cortlandt, all of them from the Borough Town of Westchester ; Stephen Ward and Joseph Drake, from Eastchester ; Major Philip Van Cortlandt, of the Manor of Cort- landt ; Colonel James Holmes, of Bedford ; John Thomas, Junior, of Rye ; David Dayton, of North Castle ; and William Paulding, of ; and, un- doubtedly, with equal promptness, the Meeting confirmed the nominations, by electing the eleven nominees to seats in the proposed Congress of the Colony. It is said, in the official report of the Meeting, that, after the election of the Deputation, as above "stated, " the Committee signed an association, simi- " lar to that which was signed in the city of Ncw- " York, and appointed Sub-Committees to superintend " the signing of the same throughout the County ; "' 3 The Associalimi, which was thus "signed by the Committee" — if any others than Slembers of the Committee had been present, they also would have signed it — was not that Association which the Continen- tal Congress had decreed and promulgated, in the preceding October, but another and entirely different affair, which had been drawn up by James Duane, John Jay, and Peter Van Schaack, and " set on foot in "New-York," on the twenty-ninth of April. It had been largely signed, in the City, and copies of it had been sent " through all the " counties in the Province ; " and the action taken at the White Plains, concerning it, was only responsive to the request of the Conmiittee of One hundred, which had superseded the Committee of Inspection, in the City of New York. The following is a copy of that yl««ocia/i<*H, care- fully copied from Iticington' a New-York Gazetteer, Ho. 107, New- York, Thursday, May 4, 1775 : PERSUADED that the salvation of the right* and liberties of -L "America, depends, under God, on the firm union of its in- " habitants, in a vigorous prosecution of the measures necessary for its " safety, and convinced of the necessity of preventing the anarchy and " confusion which attend a dissolution of the powere of government ; "we, the freemen, freeholders, and inhabitants of the city and county of " New-Y'ork, being greatly alarmed at the avowed design of the minis- ' ' try to raise a revenue in America, and shocked by the bloody scene " now acting in the Massachusetts- Bay ; do, in the most solemn manner "resolve never to become slaves; and to associate under all the ties of "religion, honour, and love to our country, to adopt, and endeavour to " carry into execution, whatever measures may be recommended by the " continental congress, or resolved upon by our provincial convention, "for the purpose of preserving our constitution, and opposing the exe- " cution of several arbitrary and oppressive acts of the British Parlia- "ment, untila reconciliation between Great Britain and America, on "constitutional principles, (which we most aidently desire) can be ob- " tained ; and that we will, in all things, follow the advice of our "general committee, respecting the purposes aforesiiid, the preservation " of peade and good order, and the safety of individuals and private prop- "erty. "Dated in New-York, Apnl and May, 1775." This Association, w ith some slight changes, was re-printes, early in 177i> ; and lie was, in other respects, well provided for, during that era of distress and ruin. The reader may judge from this e.\hibit how much of genuine patriot- ism and how much of personal selfishness, controlled the revolutionary politics of Westchester-County, 1774-76. 260 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. abreast of the most advanced of the anarchists of that period ; and if, without a semblance of that "consent" of which so much had been said and written, as a pre- requisite to any change of government — without, also, any of those qualifications in itself and authorities from others, of which mention has been made — the same handful of new-born revolutionists, at the same time, can be said to have really done so, the alle- giance of the great body of the anti-revolutionary farmers of that County, and there were no others, to its Sovereign, was violated, if not abrogated, and all the obligations of that great body of the inhabitants of the County, to obey the legally established Gov- ernments and the legally enacted Laws of the Coun- try, were dissolved, and all were made subject, in- stead, to that self-constituted County Committee which was then organized and taking its first step in Rebellion ; to the proposed Congress of the Colony, in whom was to be vested absolute, unrestrained author- ity, in all classes of governmental affairs relating only to the Colony of New York ; and to the coming second Continental Congress, in whom, also, a simi- larly absolute, unrestrained authority, on every con- ceivable subject, within each and every of the several Colonies, would, also, be seated; and, therefore, every one of those peaceful and peacefully inclined farmers and every member of their respective families were, by that handful of revolutionists, insignificant in numbers and only tools in the hands of an unprinci- pled master mischief-maker, made subject, nolms volcm, to every edict which should be pro- mulgated by either of those three self-constituted, unrestrained, revolutionary bodies ; to whatever they or either of them should determine, no matter how monstrous its character might be ; and, very often, to whatever individual members of one or other of those bodies, intoxicated with the possession of a power to which, previously, they had been strangers and revel- ing in a despotism to which the Colony had not, at any period of its existence, been subjected, should de- mand and require. With those partisan catchwords and political maxims which, a very short time previously, had filled the air with their noisiness, before the reader, he will readily determine how much of even revo- lutionary consistency and propriety and integrity there was in those doings which are now under consideration ; but, among such as those by whom those doings were inaugurated and conducted — among those whose aims were only personal and selfish and wholly regardless of every other principle whatever than that of self-aggrandizement; among whom the supremacy of the general good of the great body of the Colony or of the Continent — the " patriotism" of poets, of professional politicians, and of exuberant eulogists — was only a toy intended for nothing else than for the temporary amusement of their gaping, credulous auditory, while the political prestidigitator who presided over the show, bedizened with the tinsel which was not what it seemed to be, was secretly perfecting the juggle which was intended to deceive all others than those who were participants in the performance and sharers in the profits to be de- rived from it, — neither consistency nor propriety nor integrity was regarded or even thought of, the cupid- ity of the end entirely justified the unrighteousness of the means ; and new governing powers and new rules of conduct and new methods took their places in every Town, throughout the County; and old obli- gations were disregarded, and old guaranties were ab- rogated, and the safety of persons and of properties rested on other foundations than those which were known to and depended on by those of an earlier period. The American Revolution had finished its work and was ended : the long-established Government of Law had been crowded aside and, in fact if not en- tirely in form, had given place to a new Government of arbitrary, unbridled Force : thenceforth, the peace of the County and the rights of Individuals and of Property, within the County, sacredly respected even under a Monarchy, were held only by those who pos- sessed them, subject to the unrestrained will of the stronger. The careful reader will not have failed to see, in what hiis been written in this narrative and in the testimony which has been adduced to sustain it, the stern fact that, as far as the Colony of New York was concerned, and we write of no other Colony, the opposition to the measures of the Home Goverment, from 1763 until the Spring of 1775, which, subsequent- ly, became more widely known as The Amekican Revolution, was not, in the slightest degree, the outcome of a popular movement, in which the great body of the Colonists or any considerable portion of it arose in opposition to a wrong, inflicted or sought to be inflicted by the Parliament of Great Britain or by any other body, on the Colony or on any individ- ual member of it, as has been rhetorically pretended, by orators and poets and historians, from that day until the present ; but, on the contrary, that it origin- ated in the City of New Y'ork, among those of the commercial and mercantile classes, relatively few in number, whom, by reason of their greater wealth or of their higher social standing, we may properly re- gard, as they were regarded by themselves, as the aristocracy of the Colony — with few, if any excep- tions, they were those wealthy and enterprising Merchants, of various names and families and parties and sects and nationalities, each of whom had sunk, for all the purposes of that particular movement, whatever of individual or family or partisan or sec- tarian or national animosity, against others, he pos- sessed, combined and acting in a common opposition to all those measures of the Home Government which had tended to break down the unblushing lawlessness of those confederated Merchants, in their entire dis- regard of the Navigation and Revenue Laws of the THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 2G1 Empire, and to enforce on each of those Merchants, in his individual business, that obedience to the Laws which would be no more than his reasonable duty, while it would also tend to the suppression of that corruption of the local Revenue-officers and of that general practise of Smuggling from which he was so complacently acquiring wealth and influence. Except wherein these aristocratic Smugglers employed their ships' crews and the hnbituis of the docks and slums of the City, for purposes of intimidation and political effect, the unfranchised masses of the Colonists, in the country as well as in the City, with very rare excep- tions, and the Freeholders of small estates and those Freeholders, of either large or small degree, who pos- sessed no pecuniary interest in the foreign commerce of the Port, whether inhabitants of the City or of the rural Counties, had no part nor lot in the inception or in the organization or in the promotion of that opposition to the Home Government which, subse- quently, in its more advanced stages, became known, at home and abroad, as The American Revolu- tion. In fact, while the aristocracy of the Colony was thus confederating and consolidating discordant ele- ments and plotting and breeding disaffection to the Mother Country, the unfranchised Mechanics and Working-men, residents of the City and toilers for their daily bread, with occasional exceptions, pur- sued their respective industrial vocations, peacefully and industriously, without taking any greater interest in the anxieties of their aristocratic neighbors than those " well-born " " Gentlemen in Trade " were taking in their welfare or in that of their respective families ; while the great body of those who occupied the rural Counties of the Colony, also hard-working and peacefully inclined, knew little of and cared less for what was then disturbing the previously well- sustained quiet of the metropolitan counting-rooms. It is, indeed, true, in this connection, that the aris- tocratic Merchants and Ship-owners, in the City of New York, had been, during many years, more or less reasonably aggrieved by reason of the govern- mental interference with their well-established and very profitable "illicit trade," to which reference has been made: it is also true that, for the purpose of in- fluencing and, if possible, of intimidating the Home Government, in their opposition to that Home Gov- ernment, because of those assumed grievances, those high-toned lawbreakers had repeatedly resorted to the desperate means of, first, appealing to the maxims and the teachings of the fundamental law; of employ- ing the former for their partisan slogan, and the latter for the foundations of their passionate appeals ; and, sometimes, second, of employing, directly or indirectly, the floating and the less respectable portions of the populationof the City, assupernu:nerarieson the stage on which they were acting their several parts in the drama of theirseemiug patriotism — means which were iis unreal, in their hands, as their own patrotism," so called, was deceptive ; dnd, particularly, in the last- mentioned of the two means employed, as hazardous as it was fraudulent — but it is also true that, while the maxims and the teachings of the fundamental law which they so freely bandied, were only words of convenience, meaning nothing beyond the end for securing which they had been thus employed, their auxiliaries, thus enlisted from among the unfranchised and lowly, if not from among the vicious, were, by those who employed them, only regarded as temporary employees, engaged for the performance of particular services, of more or less danger and lawlessness ; and not as common heirs to a common inheritance for which both they and those who had thus employed them, as parties possessing an equal interest therein — as the maxims and the teachings of the fundamental law, with which both the employers and the em- ployees, in this instance, were familiar, had clearly indicated to both — were jointly contending. The American Revolution, as we said in the begin- ning, originated, not in a popular movement of the great body of the Colonists, nor in any considerable number of those Colonists, in opposition to a wrong, inflicted or sought to be inflicted by the Parliament of Great Britain or by any other body, on the Colony or on any individual member of it, but the commercial and mercantile classes, in the City of New York, the aristocracy of the Colony, in their desperate efforts to shelter "the illicit Trade" — the Smuggling — in which they had been so long and so profitably employed, from the obstructions, more than ordinarily effective, which the Home Government had raised against it, subsequent to the establishment of the Peace, in 1763. As we have said, also, the elaborate essays on the "Rights of Man and of Englishmen," on the " consent " which was necessary in order to give validity to Laws, and, generally, on the assjimed grievances to which the Colonists had been subjected, all of them the productions of well-paid Counsel or other interested writers, with which the newspapers of that period were filled to overflowing, were nothing else than means employed for the protection of that prolific, but corrupt, source of the wealth of the Mer- chants of the City of New York ; and the yells and the outrages, inflicted on both persons and properties, of those who had been employed to give ett'ect to those labored arguments of the press, by what were a^sumed to have been spontaneous outbursts of popu- lar resentment against the usurpations of the Home Government — usurpations of individual rights, by the way, which were only the same as those which were subsequently inflicted, in every State, on those who were not Freeholders; and which the Constitu- tion for the United States has always inflicted and continues to inflict on the inhabitants of the several Territories, who have always been and who arc, now, taxed without having conticnted to any such taxation, their Delegates in the federal Congress having had no right, at any time, to vote on any question whatever 260 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. abreast of the most advanced of the anarchists of that period ; and if, without a semblance of that "consent" of which so much had been said and written, as a pre- requisite to any changeofgovernment— without, also, any of those qualifications in itself and authorities from others, of which mention has been made — the same handful of new-born revolutionists, at the same time, can be said to have really done so, the alle- giance of the great body of the anti-revolutionary farmers of that County, and there were no others, to its Sovereign, was violated, if not abrogated, and all the obligations of that great body of the inhabitants of the County, to obey the legally established Gov- ernments and the legally enacted Laws of the Coun- try, were dissolved, and all were made subject, in- stead, to that self-constituted County Committee which was then organized and taking its first step in Rebellion; to the proposed Congress of the Colony, in whom was to be vested absolute, unrestrained author- ity, in all classes of governmental affairs relating only to the Colony of New York ; and to the coming second Continental Congress, in whom, also, a simi- larly absolute, unrestrained authority, on every con- ceivable subject, within each and every of the several Colonies, would, also, be seated; and, therefore, every one of those peaceful and peacefully inclined farmers and every member of their respective families were, by that handful of revolutionists, insignificant in numbers and only tools in the hands of an unprinci- pled master mischief-maker, made subject, nobris volens, to every edict which should be pro- mulgated by either of those three self-constituted, unrestrained, revolutionary bodies ; to whatever they or either of them should determine, no matter how monstrous its character might be ; and, very often, to whatever individual members of one or other of those bodies, intoxicated with the possession of a power to which, previously, they had been strangers and revel- ing in a despotism to which the Colony had not, at any period of its existence, been subjected, should de- mand and require. With those partisan catchwords and political maxims which, a very short time previously, had filled the air with their noisiness, before the reader, he will readily determine how much of even revo- lutionary consistency and propriety and integrity there was in those doings which are now under consideration ; but, among such as those by whom those doings were inaugurated and conducted — among those whose aims were only personal and selfish and wholly regardless of every other principle whatever than that of self-aggrandizement; among whom the supremacy of the general good of the great body of the Colony or of the Continent— the "patriotism" of poets, of professional politicians, and of exuberant eulogists — was only a toy intended for nothing else than for the temporary amusement of their gaping, credulous auditory, while the political prestidigitator who presided over the show, bedizened with the tinsel which was not what it seemed to be, was secretly perfecting the juggle which was intended to deceive all others than those who were participants in the performance and sharers in the profits to be de- rived from it, — neither consistency nor propriety nor integrity was regarded or even thought of, the cupid- ity of the end entirely justified the unrighteousness of the means ; and new governing powers and new rules of conduct and new methods took their places in every Town, throughout the County; and old obli- gations were disregarded, and old guaranties were ab- rogated, and the safety of persons and of properties rested on other foundations than those which were known to and depended on by those of an earlier period. The American Revolution had finished its work and was ended : the long-established Government of Law had been crowded aside and, in fact if not en- tirely in form, had given place to a new Government of arbitrary, unbridled Force : thenceforth, the peace of the County and the rights of Individuals and of Property, within the County, sacredly respected even under a Monarchy, were held only by those who pos- sessed them, subject to the unrestrained will of the stronger. The careful reader will not have failed to see, in what has been written in this narrative and in the testimony which has been adduced to sustain it, the stern fact that, as far as the Colony of New York was concerned, and we write of no other Colony, the opposition to the measures of the Home Goverment, from 17(i3 until the Spring of 1775, which, subsequent- ly, became more widely known as The American Revolution, was not, in the slightest degree, the outcome of a popular movement, in which the great body of the Colonists or any considerable portion of it arose in opposition to a wrong, inflicted or sought to be inflicted by the Parliament of Great Britain or by any other body, on the Colony or on any individ- ual member of it, as has been rhetorically pretended, by orators and poets and historians, from that day until the present ; but, on the contrary, that it origin- ated in the City of New York, among those of the commercial and mercantile classes, relatively few in number, whom, by reason of their greater wealth or of their higher social standing, we may properly re- gard, as they were regarded by themselves, as the aristocracy of the Colony — with few, if any excep- tions, they were those wealthy and enterprising Merchants, of various names and families and j^arties and sects and nationalities, each of whom had sunk, for all the purposes of that particular movement, whatever of individual or family or partisan or sec- tarian or national animosity, against others, he pos- sessed, combined and acting in a common opposition to all those measures of the Home Government which had tended to break down the unblushing lawlessness of those confederated Merchants, in their entire dis- regard of the Navigation and Revenue Laws of the THE AMEKICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 261 Empire, and to enforce on each of those Merchants, in his individual business, that obedience to the Laws which would be no more than his reasonable duty, while it would also tend to the suppression of that corruption of the local Revenue- officers and of that general practise of Smuggling from which he was so complacently acquiring wealth and influence. Except wherein these aristocratic Smugglers employed their ships' crews and the hnbituis of the docks and slums of the City, for purposes of intimidation and political effect, the unfranchised masses of the Colonists, in the country as well as in the City, with very rare excep- tions, and the Freeholders of small estates and those Freeholders, of either large or small degree, who pos- sessed no pecuniary interest in the foreign commerce of the Port, whether inhabitants of the City or of the rural Counties, had no part nor lot in the inception or in the organization or in the promotion of that opposition to the Home Government which, subse- quently, in its more advanced stages, became known, at home and abroad, as The American Revolu- tion. In fact, while the aristocracy of the Colony was thus confederating and consolidating discordant ele- ments and plotting and breeding disaffection to the Mother Country, the unfranchised Mechanics and Working-men, residents of the City and toilers for their daily bread, with occasional exceptions, pur- sued their respective industrial vocations, peacefully and industriously, without taking any greater interest in the anxieties of their aristocratic neighbors than those " well-born " " Gentlemen in Trade " were taking in their welfare or in that of their respective families ; while the great body of those who occupied the rural Counties of the Colony, also hard-working and peacefully inclined, knew little of and cared less for what wiis then disturbing the previously well- sustained quiet of the metropolitan counting-rooms. It is, indeed, true, in this connection, that the aris- tocratic Merchants and Ship-owners, in the City of New York, had been, during many years, more or less reasonably aggrieved by reason of the govern- mental interference with their well-established and very profitable "illicit trade," to which reference has been made : it is also true that, for the purpose of in- fluencing and, if possible, of intimidating the Home Government, in their opposition to that Home Gov- ernment, because of those assumed grievances, those high-toned lawbreakers had repeatedly resorted to the desperate means of, first, appealing to the maxims and the teachings of the fundamental law ; of employ- ing the former for their partisan slogan, and the latter for the foundations of their passionate appeals ; and, sometimes, second, of employing, directly or indirectly, the floating and the less respectable portions of the populationof the City, assupernu:nerarieson the stage on which they were acting their several i)arts in the drama of theirseeming patriotism — means which were as unreal, in their hands, as their own '' patrotism," so called, was deceptive; slnd, particularly, in the last- mentioned of the two means employed, as hazardous as it was fraudulent — but it is also true that, while the maxims and the teachings of the fundamental law which they so freely bandied, were only words of convenience, meaning nothing beyond the end for securing which they had been thus employed, their auxiliaries, thus enlisted from among the unfranchised and lowly, if not from among the vicious, were, by those who employed them, only regarded as temporary employees, engaged for the performance of particular services, of more or less danger and lawlessness ; and not as common heirs to a common inheritance for which both they and those who had thus employed them, as parties possessing an equal interest therein — as the maxims and the teachings of the fundamental law, with which both the employers and the em- ployees, in this instance, were familiar, had clearly indicated to both — were jointly contending. The American Revolution, as we said in the begin- ning, originated, not in a popular movement of the great body of the Colonists, nor in any considerable number of those Colonists, in opposition to a wrong, inflicted or sought to be inflicted by the Parliament of Great Britain or by any other body, on the Colony or on any individual member of it, but the commercial and mercantile classes, in the City of New York, the aristocracy of the Colony, in their desperate efforts to shelter " the illicit Trade " — the Smuggling — in which they had been so long and so profitably employed, from the obstructions, more than ordinarily effective, which the Home Government had raised against it, subsequent to the establishment of the Peace, in 1763. As we have said, also, the elaborate essays on the "Rights of Man and of Englishmen," on the "consent" which was necessary' in order to give validity to Laws, and, generally, on the assjimed grievances to which the Colonists had been subjected, all of them the productions of well-paid Counsel or other interested writers, with which the newspapers of that period were filled to overflowing, were nothing else than means employed for the protection of that prolific, but corrupt, source of the wealth of the Mer- chants of the City of New York ; and the yells and the outrages, inflicted on both persons and properties, of those who had been employed to give effect to those labored arguments of the press, by what were assumed to have been spontaneous outbursts of popu- lar resentment against the usurpations of the Home Government — usurpations of individual rights, by the way, which were only the same as those which were subsequently inflicted, in every State, on those who were not Freeholders ; and which the Constitu- tion for the United States has always inflicted and continues to inflict on the inhabitants of the several Territories, who have always been and who are, now, taxed without having consented to any such taxation, their Delegates in the federal Congress having had no right, at any time, to vote on any question whatever 2G2 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. — were no more than additional instrumentalities in the hands of wealthy and unprincipled lawbreakers, Snuigglers, employed for the purpose of sheltering those aristocratic culprits from the penalties which the Revenue-laws had imposed on them and, if possi- ble, of enabling them to continue, with impunity, those flagrant violations of morality and of Law which men of less wealth and influence could not have committed without having been exposed to fine and imprisonment and confiscation of property. This, and nothing else, in fact, constituted the beginning of what has been, more recently, unduly elevated to the dignity of a popular patriotic uprising, in support of violated Rights and for the preservation of the Colo- nies from governmental devastation and ruin; and this, in its various phases, was all there was of that notable Revolution, until the "fire-eaters" of Massa- chusetts and Virginia, members of the Continental Congress of 177-1, seized the control of that body, which had been convened for nothing else than for the promotion of reconciliation and harmony and peace, and transformed it into an instrumentality of lawless violence, of internal strife, and of a disastrous Rebellion. The careful reader will not have failed to see, also, in what has been written in this narrative and in the testimony which has been adduced to sustain it, that, while honesty and integrity and humanity and pa- triotism formed no portion of the motives which led the aristocratic Smugglers, in the City of New York, to inaugurate and to sustain a general disatiection against the Home Government; and while their aims, in thus creating and fostering a general discon- tent among the Colonists, were purely temporary and selfish, intended for nothing else than to perpetuate their own immediate opportunities to make gain at the expense of the Laws and the morals of the Colony, the methods which those influential " Gen- "tlemen in Trade" employed for the promotion of those individual and unholy purposes, were better calculated for the production of permanent than for that of temporary results, since they were employed among those, no matter how homely they were, whose recognized leaders were already well-schooled in the theories of political science, which had been employed for the texts of every political essay and of every partisan harangue, for years past, and who, besides having been politically ambitious, were, also, very shrewd and very energetic men ; and, as wealth and a long and successful career in crime are frequently productive of that arrogance and of that recklessness in the selection and employment of means, either for the perpetuation of the opportunities for wrong-doing or for the protection of the offender from the penalties of an outraged Law, which tend, more surely, to the production of disaster than to that of success, so the wealthy and aristocratic culprits, in the City of New York, to whom we have referred, in the instance now under consideration, through the means which they had employed for the intimidation of the Home Government and by their own persistent selfish- ness, gradually produced a new and powerful politi- cal element, adverse to their own pretensions to exclusiveness, to which they had been, previously, strangers. Their want of abilities, as navigators on the troubled waters of Colonial politics, was painfully evident to all others than to themselves ; and the ad- verse power of the new-formed political element was haughtily disregarded, until it had become so well established that it was enabled not only to assert but to maintain its standing. The character and influence of that new factor iu Colonial politics, during the revolutionary era, require a few words concerning its origin, beyond what we have already said of it. The outlay of wealth can generally secure ingenious advocates for any cause, no matter how unsavory it may be ; and, in that of the confederated aristocratic Smugglers of the City of New York, of which men- tion has been made, well-paid Counsel and ready writers for the newspapers, in their eagerness to sup- port their wealthy and liberal connections and clients, in their systematic violation of the written Law of the land and in their determined struggle to retain the " illicit trade " in which they were so profitably engaged, in the absence of better authorities for the support of their impassioned rhetoric, were obliged to resort to the fundamental and ill-defined theories of political science, with which, through long-continued iteration, the entire body of the inhabitants, the un- franchised as well as the Iranchised, had already become well acquainted ; and, iu iheir purposes to oppose the Home Government and to shelter their opulent employers, those who were thus employed, speakers and writers, loudly spoke and glibly wrote of " the natural Rights of Man " and of " the Rights "of Englishmen," of " Magna Charta," and of " repre- "sentation," and of "consent," without the slightest qualification, as if every man and every Colonist were intended to be included in those general and unquali- fied terms; as if every man throughout the Colony were intended to be considered the equal of every other man, therein and elsewhere ; as if every Colonist of every sect and party and in every condi- tion of life were entitled, of right, to be recognized and received and entertained, as an equal, socially and politically and in every other relation, by every other Colonist, of high or of low degree — and, without any qualification, those popular catchwords with which the City had echoed, year after year, meant all these, if they meant anything — all of which, however, in the spirit in which they had been uttei'ed, were audacious fictions, spoken or written in the interest of those who had resorted to them, only for deceitful and illegal and immoral jnirposes, as would have been quickly seen had ''the poor reptiles" who had con- stituted that lowly mass of unfranchised Working- men, directly and unreservedly, at any time, during THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 263 that long period, presumed to have asserted, tor themselves, their own manhood, and to have claimed, for themselves, those Rights which had been spe- ciously conceded as having properly belonged to them as much as to any others. In the progress of events, however, either on their own motion or on that of their ambitious leaders— the latter, generally of those who, before the confederation of all parties in an opposition to the Colonial policy of the Home Government, had been of the minority, among the Colonial politicians — these Working-men had com- menced to measure their own lowliness and their own political insignificance with the standards which had been placed in their hands, by their aristocratic neighbors, for other purposes; to assert their own political manhood ; and to demand a hearing in even the local politics of the day ; and in the efforts which were made by the confederated aristocracy of the City, to relegate that new-born and growing power — the growing power of the great body of the Mechanics and Working-men, throughout the Colony — back to its normal obscurity and political insignificance, may be seen the beginning of that ceaseless conflict between the aristocratic and the democratic ele- ments of this mighty Commonwealth, which, hav- ing been continued from father to son, is not yet ended. As we have already intimated, the confederated aristocracy of New York witnessed the appearance of that new element in the politics of the Colony, with anxiety and alarm ; and it evidently noticed, also, the constituent parts of it, and duly measured its probable strength, and judiciously determined that, in opposing it, "art" would be better suited to ensure success ; than anything of a seemingly unfriendly character would be — in other words, that what ap- peared to be concessions to the working-classes should be made, but with sufficient of modifications, in reserve, to neutralize the effect of those seeming con- cessions; and to continue, without abatement, the- control of the confederated party of the Opposition to the Home Government, in the Colony, in those aris- tocratic hands which already possessed it. Indeed, the high-toned " Gentlemen in Trade," guided by their acute legal and political advisers, John Jay and James Duane, determined to continue the same sys- tem of contemptuous deceit and treachery which had characterized all their previous political intercourse with the Working-men of the Colony ; and, in doing so, they very clearly indicated, a second time, how ill-qualified they were to navigate the troubled waters of Colonial politics. The first formal organization of those who were in confederated opposition to the Home Government of that period, which was made within the City of New York and, probably, within the Colony — the Caucus of the confederated Merchants, at Sam. Francis's, in May, 1774, which had been evidently assembled under tlie inspiration of James Duane and John Jay, who were notMerchants, but Lawyers — was really intended quite as much for the adoption of measures which should practically rebuke the evidently growing sense of their own political power which has been recently seen arising among the Working-men and the lowly, throughout the City, if for nothing else, as for the adoption of measures in further opposition to the Home Government, to which it was nominally de- voted ; and, by adroitness in their management of the movement — the master-spirits of that aristocratic as- semblage were not novices in political chicanery — while they really secured, more firmly than ever, the controlling authority in the confederated Opposition to the Home Government, in the aristocracy of the Colony, those master-spirits not only laid the founda- tions of their own and their family's further advance- ment, but they, also, so far placated the disaffected Working-men, by making the greater number of their leaders a helpless and powerless minority in the pro- posed Committee ofFifty-one, that peace and harmony of action, thoroughout the entire Opposition, were im- mediately restored — they had again deceived the masses of the people ; and, once more, a share of that confidence which those lowly masses had reposed in their aristocratic neighbors, was entirely forfeited. Although that new-born element was represented in that Committee of Fifty-one, its representatives were in a powerless minority ; and whatever was done in that body, whether the representatives of the Work- ing-men assented or dissented, was, therefore, in fact, nothing else than the act of the confederated aristoc- racy. It was not long, however, before that fraudu- lent treatment of the Working-men produced " the " great Meeting in the Fields," and the dissolution of that incongruous alliance, and the resumption of the antagonism of the masses ; and it was not long, also, before the confederation of the aristocracy itself, within as well as without the Committee of Fifty-one, was broken by the defection of those who had been the master-spirits of the organization, who, for the advancement of their own and their family's aspira- tions for place and emolument, had become as un- faithful to their aristocratic associates in the Com- mittee and to the political principles which that Com- mittee had so resolutely maintained, as they and those whom they had controlled and guided, in the Com- mittee, a few weeks previously, had been, to the great body of the Inhabitants of the City, by whom that Committee had been really created and vested with authority to represent the entire body of the Opposi- tion, within the City of New York. There was no abatement of the previously united opposition to the demands of the Working-men, however; and in each of the new-formed factions of the confederated aristocratic Opposition to the Home Government and in all which they or either of them did, there was the same entire disregard of the political rights of the Working-men, then without leaders, which had been s!) clearly conspicuous in all the actions of thearistoc- 264 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. racy, from the beginning of the political troubles, within the Colony. The reader has been made acquainted with the successful opposition which the Committee of Fifty- one had made to the plan of operations which the Boston-men had proposed and insisted on ; and with the successful establishment, instead, of its own pro- iect to call a Congress of the several Colonies, for con- sultation and for the promotion of harmony, in the party of the Opposition, throughout the Continent. He will remember, also, the narrative of the refusal of the Committee of Fifty-one to permit the Mechanics and Working-men to be represented on the ticket for Delegates to the Congress of the Colonies which it had proposed, and that of the consequent failure to elect its proposed Delegation, when its ticket was submitted to the body of the Freeholders and Free- men of the City, at the Polls. He will remember, also, what has been said of the various movements and counter-movements of the rival factions, after the defeat of the Committee's candidates ; of the treachery to the Committee who had nominated them and to their aristocratic associates, of four of the five candi- dates of the Committee; of the consequent election of those five candidates, in the absence of any other candidates, by the united support, at the Polls, of por- tions of both the aristocratic and democratic elements ; of the assembling of the proposed Continental Con- gress, in which there was not a single representative who was in sympathy with or who honestly repre- sented the working masses of the Colonists ; of the seizure of the control of that Congress by the " fire- " eaters " of Massachusetts and Virginia and South Carolina, and the consequent transformation of it, from the instrument for the promotion of reconcilia- tion and peace, for which it had been specifically created and put in motion, into one for the promotion of rebellion and bloodshed, which was utterly obnox- ious to all, except a very few, of the Colonists through- out the Continent ; of the entire neglect, by that Con- gress, to seek that redress of the grievances of the Col- onists from those by whom, only, such a redress could have been made, notwithstanding it was for that par- ticular purpose the Congress had been convened, and notwithstanding such a reconciliation was what was most earnestly desired by all good men ; " and of the readiness of that Congress to inaugurate a system of violence, in each of the Colonies, for which it af- forded ample warrants. He will remember, also, what has been stated concerning the General Assembly of the Colony ; its organization ; its bold and deter- mined opposition to the obnoxious Colonial policy of the Home Government ; its sturdy refusal to become auxiliary to or identified with the Continental Con- gress, notwithstanding it was not less determined in its opposition to the Ministry ; its measures for secur- ing from the Parliament of Great Britain, the only body from whom it could be obtained, a complete re- dress of what the Colonists regarded as grievances ; and the unsuccessful result of its efforts, in that com- mendable undertaking, only by reason of the boldness of its declarations and of the audacity of its preten- sions to rank, as the legally constituted representa- tives of a free people, notwithstanding they were Col- onists. It will be remembered by all who are familiar with the history of Colonial New York, however, that, al- though the aristocracy of that old and respectable Col- ony had always been consistent and united, in its un- deviating disregard of the real political rights of the working masses, those in the rural districts as well as those in the Cities, there had been, during many years before the period of which we write [Maij, 1775], and there was, then, a bitter feud, existing within itself, between two rival families and their respective asso- ciated families and their several adherents. It will, also, be remembered that, during a long period of years, one of those powerful families and its friends had occupied all or nearly all the high places in the Colonial Government, and had dispensed the exten- sive patronage of that Government and disposed of its valuable emoluments among those who were known to have been the friends and adherents of the family, agreeably to the dictates of its own controlling will ; while the other of those two antagonistic families and those who had been its friends and adherents, during the same long period, had uneasily and unsatisfac- torily reposed on nothing else than on their own rural respectability, without any place in the Government of the Colony, without any of that influence which place had afforded so bounteously to its more powerful rival, and without any of those emoluments of oflice which, more than almost all else, would have been so ex- ceedingly acceptable to every Scotchman and to every other within whose veins the controlling blood was Scotch. The feud between the De Lanceys and the Livingstons, in Colonial New York, is matter of his- tory which is familiarly known to every New-Yorker who is reasonably acquainted with the history of his own country. When the Home Government, eager to reduce the heavy land-tax to which the country gentlemen of England had been subjected by reason of the demands of that Government, in its vigorous prosecution of the War with France and Spain, first tightened the lines of those who administered the Customs, in the Col- onies, and thereby seriously interfered with the smug- gling in which every class of the local aristocracy was so largely and so profitably engaged, there was a common reason, which appealed to those of the De Lanceys and those of the Livingstons with equal force, for an op- position to the Home Government, in which those of both the families could harmoniously unite and from which both could be more surely benefitted ; and, in accordance with that teaching of common sense, that opposition to the Home Government, of which the reader has been told, was really established in the City of New York, with its organized Committee of THE AMERICAN RKVOLl'TION, 1774-1783. 205 Fifty-one and its more noted Continental Congress among the results of that union. At the time of whieh we write, the threatened dan- ger from t he working classes ai»i)eared to have heen averted ; the Committee of Fifty-one, or those who had remained in it after the treachery of those who had used It for a ste])|)ing-st<)ne to something of greater inriuenee, had slowly retired from the field of politi- cal action antl had been dissolved by its own action; the l\)nlinental Congress and its policy and its meth- ods had been accepted by the Livingstons and their friends and adherents as that whicli seemed to be best adapted to add strength to their hereditary a.n- tagonism to the De Lanceys and their friends and ad- herents; the Ceneral Assend)iy of the Colony and its policy and its methods, not less in opi)()sili()n to the (\)lonial i)oliev of the Home Government than the others, had been acee})ted by the De Lanceys and their friends and adherents, as well us by the great body of the Colonists, throughout the entire Colony, as the only legitimate e.xponent of the will of the Col- ony and the only one which could reasonably be ex- pected to obtain a hearing before the Home Govern- ment and the I'arliament and the people of Great Britain, from whom, only, a redress of the grievances of the Colony could be obtained ; and the Colony was again made the witness and the victim of a bitter feud between rival families, one of them holding and the other endeavoring to obtain all the ])]accs and influ- ence and emoluments of the Colonial Government. A Delegation of twelve had been elected, by a Conven- tion which had been convened for that purpose, to re- present the Colony in a second Congress of the Col- onies ; and of that Delegation, two were Livingstons, two were of those who had married Livingstons, and two others were a.ssured and well-tried supporters of the Livingston interest. The excitement which was occasioned by "the news from Lexington" had added strength to the friends of the Continental Con- gress and its revolutionary policy, to the Livingston interests, and to the revolutionary faction, generally ; and, in the same interests and with the same revolu- tionary ends in view, a Provincial Congress had been called and elected, although, as was subsetpiently seen, the Deputies thus elected were not always pli- ant tools, to be handled by a skilful politician, for purely jiartisan jmrposes. The control of the politi- cal all'airs of the Colony, it will be seen, as far as tliosc affairs could be controlled by the revolutionary fac- tion, was, by the election of the mend)ers of the Pro- vincial Congress, firmly secured to the Livingstons and to their friends; and the government of the Col- onists, thenceforth, was revolutionary, without war- rant of Law, and oligarchic. In England, at the time of which we write, the Ministry, revelling in the strength of its party and haughtily disregarding everything of prudence and conciliation, had recently led the Parliament tocnact, first, the Hill for restraining the Trade and Commerce 18 I of the Provinces of Ma.ssachusetts-Bay and New I Hanii)shire and the Colonies of Connecticut and ' Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, in North America, with Great Britain, Ireland, and the Mritish Islands in the West Indies; and to prohibit such Provinces and Colonies from carrying on any Fishery on the Banks of Newfoundland or other places therein mentioned, under certain specified conditions and lim- itations; and, second, the Bill lor restraitung the Trade and (-ommerce of the Colonies of New Jersey, I'ennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, and Houth Caro- lina, with Great Britain, Ireland, and the British Islands in the West Indies, under certain conditions and limitations — the Commerce and Fishing Rights of the Colony of New York, in each instance, having been left, undisturbed — and the First Session of the Fourteenth Parliament was drawing near to its close. The disturbance of Trade which was consequent on the political differences, had already i)rodnced great distress, in Great Britain, among those whose lives and labors and properties were employed in the man- ufacture of goods si)ecifically intended for tiie Ameri- can market; and, at the same time, the Merchants, in that country, and those who had given credits, com- mercial or financial, to the Colonists, in America, were anxiously considering in what way, if at all, since entire commercial non-intercourse, except that which was surrei)titi()us and corrupt,' had been or- dered by the Parliament as well as by the Continental Congress, they were to receive payment of what was due or becoming due to them — anxieties which were not removed by the aristocratic and " patriotic "debtors," in some of the Colonics, at least, whence remittances had been entirely susj)ended and where the Courts of Justice were not permitted to assist in the collection of debts. In New York, at the time of which we write, as far as the great body of the Colonists in the rural Counties were concerned, there does not appear to have been any noticeable change — the farmers had not been disturbed in their labors, during 1774; and the surplus of their ])roductions, which had found early markets, had undoubtedly been disposed of at those better than ordinary prices which are known to have prevailed, in consequence of the increased demand which had been i)roduced, early in the Autumn, by the approaching embargo. In the City, the suspen- ' Till" full liiippliog of p Nlii|i|iril to Boston, with llic kiioMlcdgo of olliocrs wlio oociipiod plai is in tlio (iovcrnnii-nf, on TninKport Sliips nncl diwgniscil ns Stores for the liojal Arinv — eonii'tinu's paiil for, a» Slori'.s for tlic .Vrniv, by tlie KinK's Tria.inrer— .subscijuoiitl.v bocanio a suliji'it of scanliinK iiivistipition before tlie Ilonsu of Commons. The Sclu dnles of (ioods tlins shipped afford amnsin^ evidence of what were oflicially eonsidered a^ Army StoreH ; tliey clearly show, also, the relative weight of morality and im- morality, whenever the profits of trade are considered, and how Ta.-itly more the Profit ami Iaisb .Vccounis, on their respei tivc LeilKerw, will in- fluence the morals and the religion anil the doings of " Men in Biisi- " ness," Merchants and others, than anything which their Mothers have tanght them, anything which their Bibles have presented to llicir consideration, or anything which their consciences have brought before them 266 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. sion of the foreign trade, by the experimental action of the first Continental Congress, must have been as disastrous to the great body of the inliabitants — those possessing small Estates as well as the Tradesmen and Mechanics and Workingmen, of every lowly class — as that much writteu-of Port Bill, imposed by the retributive action of the King and the Parliament of Great Britain, had produced on the similar classes who had inhabited the Town of Boston, in the pre- ceding year ; but the men of New York and their de- pendent families had endured whatever of hardships there had been in the suspension of their respective means of support, without those outcries, nominally of assumed distress among " the suffering inhabitants " — more loudly uttered by demagogues, for other pur- poses, than by those who were really sufferers, pray- ing for relief — which had distinguished Boston, a few months previously, and which had induced the tender- hearted, the world over, to become politicians and to reprobate the Home Government by whom the Port Bill had been imposed ; to sympathize with those who were said to have been "suffering," although the latter could have found renuinerative laborelsewherethan in Boston ; and to contribute the means which were really expended, very largely, more for the benefit of the tax- payers than for that of the " suffering poor " of the Town. The suspension of their business, by the aristoc- racy of America, who could sustain the present strain in order to ensure the receipt of an ultimate advantage, was, we say, no less severe in New York than the simi- lar suspension of her business, by the aristocracy of (treat Britain, had been in Boston; and thesufferngs of of the working classes were, undoubtedly, quite as keen- ly felt in the one case as in the other ; but, in the in- stance of New York, there was neither an api)eal for help nor an ostentatious display of "i)atriotic" sym- pathy, extending help ; and if the sufferings of the lowly victims, in New York, were noticed at all, by those "patriotic" aristocrats who had produced those distresses, it was only in those congratulatory remarks, not unfreciuently seen in the published correspondence of the not distant later period, that the necessities of the working-classes were compelling them to enlist in the Armies, in order to obtain even a portion of the food which was needed to keep their dependent wives and little ones from starvation, and that "for the " Rights of man and of Englishmen." The "determination" of the Continental Congress of 1774, to appoint Committees "in every County, " City, and Town," " whose business it should be at- " tentively to observe the conduct of all persons, " touching the Association " which that Congress also enacted, and with extraordinary powers for persecut- ing and bringing ruin on whomsoever those local Committees should determine to put under a ban, had not yet become as well-seated, in the Colony of New York, as in some of the other Colonies;* but the 1 The followiug description of the methods adopted liy tliose local City of New York was thus controlled ; and, possibly, some of the rural coninumities who were more than ordinarily revolutionary in their inclinations, may, also, have already appointed such Committees. In Westchester-county, however, although the handful of ofliceseekers who hovered around the Morrises, and who did what those haughty leaders told them to do in return for official favors received or looked for, had recently apj)ointed such a County Committee, at the time of which we write, it had not yet com- menced its subsequently well-known work of inquisi- torial proscription and plunder and outrage. There were individuals, among the farmers or in the little villages or at the several landings, who remembered and continued to condemn the usurpations of i)olit- ical authority which had signalized the first Conti- nental Congress and had divided and lessened the power of the Opposition ; and these and others who had attended the recently-held meeting at the White Plains may have been and undoubtedly were discon- tented and outspoken, within their respective families and among their neighbors, producing, in some in- stances, undoubtedly, ill-feelings and personal ani- mosities and less harmonious neighborhoods. But, notwithstanding all these, the great body of the in- habitants of the County was entirely undisturbed ; the labors <;f the day had been done, as they had pre- viou.sly been done, on the hundreds of homesteads, throughout the County ; political questions in which they felt no interest had not slackened the domestic or the out-door industries nor lessened the holiday or evening pleasures of by far the greater number ; and, with here and there a clearly perceptible change, the staid old agricultural County was undisturbed, in all its various relations. The Colonial officers con- tinued to discharge their various duties, as their pre- decessors had done — John Thomas, who had occupied the Bench of the Court of Common Pleas, since May, 1755, continued to discharge the duties of that office, as well as those of the other office of Representative of the County, in the General Assembly, without Ciinmiittecs, and the extent to which they carried their new-found authority, although it relates peculiarly to Virginia, is entirely applica- ble to the methods and tlie extent of authority of similar Conunittees, in every other Colony : ''The AasucUilioiis first, in part, entered into, roconi- " nu iided liy the i)eople of tliis Colony, and adopted by what is called '■ 'the Continental Congres.",' are now enforcing, throughout this coun- "try, with the greatest rigour. K C'ununitlce has been chosen in every "County, whose business it is to carry the Aiisttcuitiint tii the Congress " into execution ; which C'oiuniittee assumes an authority to inspect the "books, invoices, and all other secrets of the trade and correspondence " of Merchants; to watch the coniiuct of every Inhabitant, without dis- " tiuction ; and to send for all such as come under their suspicion, into "their presence, to interrogate tluui respecting all matters which, at "their pleasure, they think fit objects of their in(piiry, and to 'stig- " 'niatize,' as they term it, such as they find transgressing what they " are now hardy enough to call ' the Laws of the Congress,' which ' stig- " ' matiziug ' is no other than inviting the vengeance of an outrageous "and lawless mob, to be exorcised upon the uuhajipy victims."— ( T/ic E'irl Tiiuimiire I" till- Emi nf D<(ilimiiilli, "Vi'u.i.ixmskvkg," IVinjiiiui,] " December 24, 1774," laid before the House of Commons, February 1.., 1775.— Almon's Piit Hiniienkn ii lleijMei; House of C'onunons, First Session, Fourteenth Parliament, i., 185, It-C.) TH?: AMF]]IICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. being disturbed, by any one; and James De I^ancey, who had been the Shcrifr of tiie County, since June, 177(1, and David Dayton, who had been tlie Surro- gate, since June, 17li(), and Jolin Bartow, who had been the Clerk of the County, since April, 17()0, each in his appointed official place, continued to discharge the official duties which were incumbent on them, and to receive and to enjoy the emoluments which those several offices secured to them — the Courts of tlie County continued their several Sessions, at the appointed times; and, as we have said, with occa- sional individual or neighborhood exceptions, a gen- eral (jniet prevailed, a quiet which preceded a ter- rible convulsion, as the reader will shortly see. The machinery of government which had been created by the revolutionary elements, within and without the Colony of New York, was, very soon, put in motion. It was composed of only a series of con- claves, each of which exercised, arbitrarily, Legisla- tive, Executive, and Judicial functions, unrestrained by either constitutional or statutory provisions, and controlled, in whatever it determined to do or not to do, only by the individual impulses of such, within this Colony, as the Livingstons and the Morrises, the Van Cortlandts and the Thomases, and as James Duane and John Jay, men, in every instance, who were distinguished for their entire disregard of and con- tempt for the unfranchised and lowly masses, of every class, as well as of those who were franchished, but not " well-born " — the former being looked on, by them, as fit only for labor and for fighting ; and the latter as no better than the others, unless on election- days — and who represented only the uncontrolled and purely aristocratic prejudices and antipathies and the equally uncontrolled and malignant partisan animosi- ties and jealousies of those who, during many years, had been excluded from ofiicial life, and who, by the whirligig of rebellion, were, then, first enjoying, in an extremely diluted form, what they had so long and so anxiously hankered for.' The Congress of the Continent assembled at Phila- delphia, agreeably to order, on Wednesday, the tenth of May, 177;"); and, ten Colonies being represented — only three of the Delegates from New York having been present, that Colony was not counted — -it was formally organized by the election of Peyton Randolph, of Virginia, as its President, aiul Charles Tiiomson, of ■ It was well-nnid by Henry 0. Van Sclinack, in liiR Life of liis futlior, " It will Honicoly now be ciediteil timt iidwoi-h so iinilcfincil and nxtinor- " iliiiury shoiilil have been intriisteil t»i a frw indiviiliialH, liy a propU' so " jealous of encroacliinciits ; wlioso stMiso of liberty wJts so keen as to ' 'snufT tlin appnutcli of tyranny in evpry tainted breeze;' and wlio, "on tbeir own part, bail none to war against a preamble." — Van Srli!U»ck's Life «./ I'rtrr Vitu Mnui. k, (17. Thti barbarities wbieli were ofticially inllicted on iuiliviut an overt aet or tbe inclination to commit one, as tliose barbarities have iM'en ollicially recorded, were jH^rfectly shocking; ; and some of those which were intllcted on residents of Westchester-eonnty, under the guidance of such notable \Vest«-hester-ei»iinly men as .John .lay and Gouverneur Morris, will find places in other parts of this narrative. 2(17 Peiin.sylvania, as its Secretary.'^ The history of its doings, generally, is known to every intelligent i)er- son, and need not be re[)eated, unless in such instances as particularly related to Westchester-county or to those who were within the bounds of that County, during the period of the War of the Revolution. On Monday, the twenty-second of May, 1775, a number of those who had been designated as Deputies from the several Counties of the Colony, assembled at the Exchange, in the City of New York, for the pur- pose of forming a Provincial Congress ; but, because they conceived there was not a sufficient number of Deputies present, they adjourned until the following day, without having attempted to organize. On the latter day, [Tucsdai/, Ma;/ 23, 177-'),] those Deputies who were then }>resent assembled at the Exchange, " the Deputies of a majority of the Counties " having appeared; and a "Provincial Congress for the " Colony of New-York " was organized by the election of Peter Van Brugh Livingston — one of the most violent of the former " Committee of Corres()ondence," a brother of the Lord of the Manor of Livingston, and a brother-in-law and partner in business of that Earl of Stirling, so called, who figured so largely in the military history of the War of the Revolution — to be its President ; and John McKesson and Robert Benson, the latter a brother of that Egbert Benson whose extraordinary election as a Deputy from Duchess-county to the earlier Provincial Convention, has been already noticed, were elected to be ils Sec- retiiries.-' Although the doings of that body are less generally known than those of the Continental Con- gress, the purposes of this work will not require any further reference to them, than to such portions as relate ])articularly, to Westchester-county or to those who were within that County, and to such other por- tions thereof as, in tlieir effects, affected that County or its inhabitants, during the period of the War of the Revolution. As has been already stated, the local Committee for Westchester-county was created on the eighth ol'May, 1775, ninety members having been miraculously created out of the material of which twenty-three were actually comjiosed ; and (iilbert Drake was made its Chairman.^ Micah Towiisend, subseiiuently holding other offices of Iioihu', in both Westchester and Cumberland-counties, was made the Secretary of that Committee ; ^ and its doings, as far as they were 2 Jouniat nf Iho Cniii/mn, " Piiii.ADEi.i'riiA, Wednesday, May 10, 177'>." Jmtniiit iif Ihf rrnriitriut ( 'timjrrmi^ *^ {'it\ Nkw-Vokk, .May '.iilnl, ** 177')," and addition, including the proceedings on the following; day. < Cmh iill-iU nf Ih lr,i,ilex Id I'rni i„ri,il r„u.—llisl<,r„ i,l MttintHi'fiplJt rt'lufire Ui Ihf Wur of tin' lii'fittiiliim ; Cfnlt-iitiiih of llrlrijiilrs^ xxiv., lltl ; llirimjtoii' H .Veic- V-i A- (.■ive were signetl *'Gilbkut Dkake, ** ClHtiniiaii ; bnt those of the Delegates ele<'ted to the .Second Provin- cial Congress, signed by the same person, bear the signature of " Oiluekt '• II. DitAKE, Cliiiiniiiiii." — u/ .Wricul Maniticrii'U^ etc.: Credentials of Oelt-ynteit^ x.xiv,. ti7. 268 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. recorded in the aiiiials of the County, will be duly noticed, as the narrative progresses. The organization of the Provincial Congress, on the twenty-third of May, 1775, has been already men- tioned and described : ' a more particular description of the membership of that body which, in the interest of those who were in rebellion, was to take places be- side the several departments of the legally constituted Colonial (fovernment, in the government of tlie Col- ony, and which was to wield so important an influence over all who were within the Colony, seems to be in- cumbent on us, in this place. Of the fourteen Counties of which the Colony of New York was then composed, thirteen were properly designated " the Counties," or " the country Counties," since they were mainly occupii'd by conununitics of farmers, unless iji the instances of the frontier Coun- ties, in which hunters and trappers and surveying parties and, not unfrequently, families and villages of the aborigines, aflbrded considerable portions of their continually changing i)opulations. Of these thirteen rural Counties, some of the inhabitants of Albany and Duchess and Westchester and Queens made pre- tensions to something of social superiority, somewhat akin to the aristocracy of the City of New York ; but, in none of them, unless in Albany-county, was there any j)retension to a controlling local aristocracy; and in all of them, the actual tillers of the soil largely out- numbered all other classes, on the Census-lists. From such widely dissimilar constituencies, in town and country, therefore, even from those who were not widely separated and differently situated, there could not be expected Delegations to the Provincial Con- gress who were homogeneous in their characters and dispositions and inclinations; and as all those rural Delegations ])Ossessed more or less of the elements which [jrevailed among those who were nominally their respective constituencies, it was to be a work of time and patience and skill, in partisan and factional discipline, to bring all of them into " working order,'' in the interest ol' the controlling, or revolutionary, faction of the aristocracy — a work of which notice will be taken, hereafter. The City and County of New York, of course, was represented in the Provincial Congress by the ex- tremes of both conservatism and of radicalism, witli a generous sprinkling of those who favored that po- litical association which promised the greater pecu- niary pr(')fjts ; and the several Delegations from Al- bany and Queens and Westchester and Duchess-coun- ties, respectively contained, also, more or less of mixed memberships. From the remaining nine Counties, the Delegations were generally smaller in number; and, very largely, especially in the earlier days of the existence of the Congress, tiiey were composed of those who had honestly come for the purpose of pro- tecting the Colony from the wrongs to which the Home Government was said to have subjected it ; but, at the same time, their inclinations were peace- ful; and they preferred a reconciliation with Great Britain, instead of a Civil War, which had been al- ready commenced ; and, because they had not yet been corrupted by the social influences of life in the City nor by the allurements of official plunder, they were ready to join with all or with any, regardless of their factional afliliations, who entertained similar views, in the practical establishment of those funda- mental principles. The individual mend)ers of the first Provincial Congress of New York, at theojjcning and during the earlier period of the existence of that body, niay, therefore, be classed as, firt^t, the avowed Conservatives, who were led by such as John De Lancey and Benjamin Kissam and Abraham Walton and Richard Yates and George Folliot and Walter Franklin ; as, sccoml, the " Corporal's CJuard " of avowed llevolutionists, who were led by John Morin Scott and Alexander McDougal and Abraham Bra- sier ; as, f/iird, a larger number, tho^e who, under the guise of patriotism, were aiming at nothing else than at places and at the influences and emoluments to be produced by those places, who were led by the Living- .stons and the Van Cortlandts, by Gouverneur Morris and John Thomas and Melanthon Smith and Abra- ham Ten Broeck and Egbert Dumond and Nathaniel Woodhull and John Sloss Hol)art; and as, /u.s/, out- numbering all others, those who had lell their sev- eral rural homes and come to the City of New York, for the purpose of serving their country, without hav- ing had, at that time, any other aim. As the several Delegations voted as units, the votes of the several Counties having been cast in accord- ance with the d(!ternnnation of the majority of the Delegates of each who were then present, the votes of individual Delegates, unless in instances of formal dissent, are not recorded ; but tlie conservatism of the organized Congress, as an aggregate, was seen, im- mediately after the organization of that body and the adoi)tion of its necessary /iii/c>! of Ortlvr, on the first day of the Session, when Isaac Low, of the City of New York, who is already so well known to the reader, had commenced tlie work of centralizing all of political authority and power which were within the Colony, except those of the local police, in the Continental Congress, a work which has been per- sistently continued until this day, by men of the same classes of society and i)olitics, and for the same pur- l)oses; and when, very promptly and very aptly, Gouv- erneur Morris, of the County of Westchester, who was already conspicuously notorious for his contemptuous disregard of the personal and political rights of the unfranchised masses of the Colonists, who were only " [)oor rei)tiles " in his aristocratic vocabulary,- had seconded the motion. The Resolution which Isaac Low had thus offered, was in these words : ' Vide page V!U7, aiite. 2.Sce liis letter to Mr. Penn, pages 187, 188, ante. THI<: AMKRK^AN REVOLUTION, 1774-1788. "Resolvkd, As the opinion of this Congress, that im- " Illicit ohedience ought to he paid to every reeoni- " nienilation of the Continental C/ongress, for tiie gen- " eral regulation of the associated Colonies; but this " Congress is conijietent to and ought, freely, to de- " liberate and determine on all matters relative to the " internal police of this Colony." ' Such a Resolution, so evidently in the interest of the master-s[)irils of the revolt and in that of the most ultra of the aristocracy of the (Jolony, at the same time so radically subversive of those fundamen- tal principles ol' government which were professed to have been the basis of the existing Rebellion against the Mother Country, very reasonably excited imme- diate alarm; and, notwithstanding the Delegates were scarcely warm in their seats, the two ill-concealed monarchists who were temporarily masquerading, within the Provincial Congress, as republicans, and tho.se, of the same class, elsewhere, in whose behalf the Resolution had been offered, were very ctrectually snubbed — on a motion of John Aforin Scott, the very able leader of the handful of ultra-revolutionists, sec- onded by David C'larkson, both of the City of New York, the liesohition was defeated, only Richmond- county having voted in favor of it,- neither the mover nor the seconder of it having received the support of the County of whiidi he professed to have been a proper representative.' Tiie signal rebuke which the not yet corrupted "country gentlemen," members of the Provincial Congress of New York, had thus given to those who had pro|)o.sed to make the Colony of New York and all which it possessed subject, in all its relations, ex- cept in the local [)ower of police, to a foreign body over whom neither the individual Colonists nor the aggregated Colony could possibly have exercised the slightest control, and by whom both the individual Colonists and the Colony in its entirety would have been subjected to an absolutely desi)otic control by those, of other Colonies, who already envi(!d the ris- ing greatness of New York, apjicars to have been etlective, in that direction ; but, two days afterwards, the little ultra-revolutionary cli(iue, within the Con- gress, taking courage from the evidently independent si)irit which had been manifested by the rural Dele- ^ Jfittni'il ttf lliif PritriiirUtl Cinnjn'ns^ **^> ho., P.M., May 2:iii.'* -The vote of IlichinoiKl-ooiiiity, in tliis t-arJy inBtjinoc, in very remark- able, eHpecially when it m coiiHiilerud in eoiinertion with the later in- stances of tliut Coiiiity's want of syiniiatliy with l>oth the Continental (?ongres.s anil tliose wlio enf;inei*re()w and Gouverneur Morris, and of the ultra-revolu- * Journal of tite I'roviucial CongreMj **'y bo., P.M., May 2.'>t>'." 270 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. tionarj' faction, represented by John Morin Scott and Thomas Smith ; but, whatever may have led to the practical rejection of those two propositions, each of which tended toward the centralization of the entire authority and all the power of the several Colonies, iu the Congress of the Continent, thereby destroying the autonomy of each of the Colonies, without sub- jecting that Congress, in its exercise of that authority and that power, to any other limitation than the un- bridled will of a majority of the Delegations compos- ing it, this is clearly evident : the Provincial Con- gress intended, by those two adverse votes, to declare that, though a purely local body, it was, nevertheless, determined not to divest itself, even by implication, of that unquestioned governmental supremacy, within the Colony of New York, which it had already ac- quired, no matter how ; that, on the contrary, it had determined to retain, within itself, and to continue to exercise, unhampered by the interference of any other body, the several legislative, and judicial, and executive authorities, within the Colony, which it al- ready held, no matter by what warrant ; that it would yield to the Continental Congress, if it yielded any- thing to that foreign body, nothing else than a volun- tary ac(iuicscence ; that it would promulgate the Or- ders and Resolutions and " recommendations " of that other Congress, if it pronuilgated them at all, not as original and .supreme rules of action of all who were or who might be within the Colony of New York, but as the bases of its own local enactments, to the latter of wiiich, per »e, and not to the former, it re- quired the implicit obedience of all those within or to come within the Colony, whose supreme political ruler it assumed to be and to remain. In short, from the beginning, the Provincial Congress of New York recognized no sui)erior, controlling power, except that of its own actual constituents ; and, at no subse- (juent i)eriod — not even when the Governor of New York declined the release of Alexander McLeod, though demanded by both the Government of Great Britain and the President of the United States — has theri^ been any more resolute supporter of the Sover- eignty of the several States, any more determined op- ponent of a transfer to any other body, from the People — which latter word is only an equivalent term for the State, and, in New York, if not else- where, is used, officially, to designate the State, it- self — of the original authority, the Sovereignty of those several Peoi)les, than was that revolutionary Congress of the Colony of New York, in its opposi- tion, on the one hand, to its ultra-aristocratic master- spirits, and, on the other, to the ultra-revolutionists among its members, early in the year 1775. As a ])ortion of the history f those times, reference may be made, in this j)lace, to an incident which occurred in the Provincial (Jongress, soon after that body had rejected the Resolution which Isaac Low and Gouverneur Morris had offered, of which men- tion has been made. On the same day, the first day of the Session of that revolutionary body, during the same afternoon, a motion was made by Alexander McDougal, a Presbyterian, providing for the appoint- ment of a Committee of two, to apply to all the Ministers in the City who could pray in English, "to " make such an arrangement among themselves as "would enable them alternately to open the Congress, "every morning, with prayer;" but Gouverneur Mor- ris, Lewis Graham, Colonel Philip Van Cortlandt, Colonel James Holmes, Stephen Ward, and John Thomas, Junior, six of the nine members of the Con- gress who were from Westchester-county, probably recognizing the evident impropriety of spreading their politically dirty hands before Him who giveth no favor to those who loveth and maketh a lie, dis- sented from a majority of the Congress, and caused their dissent to be entered on the Journal of that body.' On Friday, the twenty-sixth of IMay, the Prov- incial Congress adopted, unanimously, a Resolu- tion, offered by Gilbert Living.ston of Duchess- county and seconded by John De Lancey of New York City, providing for the appointment of a Committee of one from each County, "to draw "up and report a proper Resolve of this Con- "gress, recommending to the different Counties "in this Colony, to form themselves into County "Committees, and also into Sub-committees for their " respective Townships and Districts, and recoinmend- "ing the signing of the General Asuonation ; and also " to prepare and report to this Congress a draft of a " letter to be sent to the Committees and other per- " sons in the several Counties, for the above purposes, " and with copies of such Resolution." In that Com- mittee of one from each County, Major Philip Van Cortlandt represented Westchester-county ; and, on the following day, {May 27, 1775] it made a Report, in due form.' The Resolution which was thus reported, was in these words: "Resolved: That it be recommended, " and it is hereby accordingly recommended, to all the " Counties in this Colony, (who have not already done "it,) to appoint County Committees, and also Suh- " committees for their respective Townships, Pre- " cincts, and Districts, without delay, in order to carry " into execution the Resolutions of the Continental " and this Provincial Congress. " And that it is also recommended to every Inhabitant ''of this Colony, who has hitherto neglected to sub- " scribe the General Ansociafion, to do it with all con- "venient speed. And for these purposes that the " Committees in the respective Counties in which " Committees have been formed, do tender the said " Ansociafion to every Inhabitant within the several " Districts in each County. And that such persons, 1 Jmirmil of the Priiriiwial O'ligress "5 ho., P.M., May 2;id." ^ Jmmuil i'ftlic ComjreM, "4 ho., I'.M., May 2(ith, 177.'>." ' Jvuriial of the Congress, " Die Satuinii, 9 ho., A.M., May 27th, 1775." THE AxMERlCAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 271 " in those Counties or Districts wlio have not appoint- " ed Coniuiitteos, as shall be ajipointcd by the uieui- " here of tliis Congress representing such Counties and " Districts res|)ectively, ' do malce sucii tender as afore- "said in sucli C^ounties and Districts respectively; "and that the said Committees and persons respec- lively do return the said Asxoruilioa and the names '• of those who shall neglect or rel'use to sign the same, " to this Congress, by the fifteenth day of July next, " or sooner, if j>ossible."' The letter which was rejiorted, as a companion to this Kesolulion, was in the following wortls : " Nkw-Yokk, May 1775. " GeXTLEMKN : '• You will see by the enclosed Resolution of '■ this Congress, that it is recommended to such of " the Counties as have not already formed Commit- " tees, to do it witliout delay, and that.>iich of tlie In- " habitants of this Colony as have hitherto neglected " to subscribe the General Association, do it, so as to " enable you to make a return within the time limited " in the Resolution. " As the execution of this Resolve is committed to " your care, we recjuest you to use your best endeavours " to see that this recommendation be complied with. " It may, nevertheless, be proper to inform you that it " is the sense of this Congress that no coercive steps " ought to be used to induce any person to sign the " Axi^ocialion. The propriety of the measure, the example of the other Counties, and the necessity of " maintaining a perfect union in every part of this " Colony, it is presumed, are sufficient reasons to " induce the Inhabitants of your County to comply " with this requisition." The Resolution and letter which were thus reported to the Provincial Congress, were taken up, for con- sideration, on the twenty-ninth of May; and, after some amendments had been made therein, they were " approved, agreed to, and resolved ; " and five hun- dred copies were ordered to be j)rinted ; and as many copies of the letter as should be necessary were ordered to be signed by the President and delivered to the members of the Congress, "to be by them " directed." - As the County of Westchester had already been favored with the appointment of a County-committee, or what purported to have been such a Committee,'' it is probable that it was not considered necessary, in that instance, to interfere with that former appoint- ' Tlie uutlioi-ity which apppare to have bct-n vestwl in iiienilwrs of tlie Pri>Tiiicial Ouigrc^, to apitoint local CoiiiniitttM^s when* the inhabitants lia, prise of the Provincial Congrei« of New Vtirk, conid they also bo published, would umloubtedly throw different tints of light and color on many a romance, calleIay 'ZV^, • ' 177.5." ■' See pages 258, 259, ante. ment ; and there is very little evidence, as far as wc have been able to fiiul any, which indicates that the several Towns throughout the County paid any atten- tion to the recommendation of the Congress, lor the ap[)ointinent of Town-committees; ' and there is no evidence whatever, that any attempt was made, in any of those Towns, to obtain the signatures of the body of the iuhabitanls of the County, to the Genmd A-ssociafiun which had been enacted by the Con- tinental Congress of 1774, nor to any other such Association-^ — the Provincial Congress had done no more than, nominally, to " recomnientr' to the inhabitants to sign the AsKuiiatiun ; ^ it not only did not authorize the employment of force in order to obtain signatures thereto, but it expressly ilisclaimed, in advance, the entertainment of any such idea ; ' the Congress itself, by a formal vote, had i)Ost- poned a formal api)roval of that General Assoriatiim as well as all of the other tloings of the Continental Congress, who had enacted it ; " and, for these reasons, as well as for others with which the reader is already familiar, the conservative yeomanry of Westchester- county was not in a hurry to either recognize or sign it. The Committee of the Provincial Congress who had been ajipoiiited to consider the very important subject of the Currency, for the support of the Rebel- lion, made a very clear and able Report, on the thir- tieth of May, in which some of the commercial troubles produced or likely to be produced by the Rebellion were very graphically presented; and an issue * There were Ooniniitteos in a small number of the Towns, at a hiter period ; but there is no evidence, as far as we have knowletlge, that they originated in the recommendation of the i^rovincial Ct>ngress, nor as early iw in 177.'>. The .IsK')< i/(ii, duly signed by those who would sign it and duly noting those who declined to do si>, was to be returned to the Secretary of the Provincial Congress, on or before the fifteenth of July, 177.1. The tiles of that Congress, which are preserved in the otlico of the Secretary of State, at Albany, show, however, that the only Counties or Towns which made any Returns of .Vssociatore, in response to this Ue.^olution, were Orange, l ister, Suffolk, Duchess, one District in Charlotte, three Districts in Cumberland, and a few .scattering names, not more than fifty, in yneens ; but there is no such Keturn Irom Wcsti liester couiity ; there is no such Keturn among the archives of the County, in tlu' office of the County-clerk ; and we have faileil to And anything resembling such a lieturn, in the ollices of the Town-ch rks, in the several Towns. The signer of the following, which was sent from .\nii-nia, in Duchess-county, is clas,-i*'d among the " 3 Tories" of that "Precinct: ' "Juneyo f"". A'' H?.'). This may sertyfy all \h'\m'\ wliome It may " cornsern that I the Svliscriln'r am willing to do what is best and " Wright to secure the priviligs of a niariga both sivel ami sjicnd iiiid to " follow the iulvi.se of our K<'verend l ongres so far iu< they do the woni " of Ciod and the e.\z;imi>le of ,Iesvs Christ and I 1io|k' in the grace of (iml " uo more will l>e rei|uired, as witness my hand, "John G.»iin8kv." *See the Resolution> of the Provincial Congress, [Wge 270, ante. " See the general Cin-nlar Letter of the Congress, on this page, ante. The same declamtioii, more distinctly nttereil, may !«• s ChriMn^thrr Ynh-ii mnt Mtijnr Yf lli^ Foiw/'i, of Trifm-vmnlii ; in thnt fr*>m thf mint*' In O'lnm l Jtitii*'M Iti^jt-r^, nl Kvnt, ill Citmherhintl-raunty ; and ill thnt fmm l/w lutrnf to ./(i#-o/i lUiUr y find Colonel /V/en», »i/ tSloiicfnttrr-cimnltf — all of them dateil "In Phovin- "ci.\L CosiiiFjw, Nrw York, the :i1b1 May, 177.>." ^JotiriMl tij thv I'ruL-iiKial C'tfiij/rtriui, " 5 ho., P.M., 3lay ^.'i*"'," juiges 93, ante. 272 HISTORY, OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of that Currency by the Continental Congress, with ^i{^ecif^e(l provisions for the payment of it, was recom- mended ■ — the original i)roposition for the emission of ihose immense amounts of " Continental-bills," which, suljsequently and with the help of friendly legislation in the Continental Congress, afforded so favorable an ojjportunity for repudiation by the United States, " the faith of the Nation " to the con- trary notwithstanding. The Kei)ort of the Committee was " fully debated " and considered," by the Provincial Congress, and, by an unanimous vote, it was adopted, with an order transmitting a copy of it to the Delegates of the Col- ony, in the Continental Coiigrcss.- A circumstance occurred, within the rrovinciul Congress, early in its Session, which rcciiiires partic- ular notice in this place. One week after that body had been oi iginally or- ganized, [jl/'f// -50, 1775] Benjamin Kissam, of the City of New York, " moved in tiie words following, " to wit : ' Forasmuch as a reconciliation between " Great Britain and these Colonies, on constitutional " principles, is essential to the well-being of both " countries, and will prevent the horrors of a Civil " War, in which this Continent is now about to be " involved, it is, therefore, the indispensable duty " of this Congress, to communicate to the Delegates " of this Colony, in Continental Congress, their sen- " timeuts respecting the terms of such reconciliation; " I, therefore, move that a Committee be appointed to i)repare and state the terms on which such re- " conciliation may be tendered to Great Britain, con- " sistent with the just Liberties and Freedom of the " subject, in America, to the intent that the same, " when approved by this Congress, may be laid before " the said Delegates, as our sense, on this important " subject, to be humbly submitted to their considera- " tion." A (piestion of such great importance and so dis- tasteful to many of tlie Deputies, was reasonably dis- cussed with much warmth ; and it is very evident that, had the vote been taken, at that time, the mo- tion would have been ado[)ted by the Provincial Con- gress. It was evidently approved liy a majority of the Counties ; but, if the vote could be posti)oned, changes might be effected, by fair means or by foul — there were astute and e.xi)ericnced politicians within and around that I'rovincial Congress — and three of the Counties who were opposed to the motion re- sorted to the tenth Rule of the Congress,^ not re- sorted to, on any other occasion, during the entire \ Janninl n/ Die Pnirimial Onujnss, "Die M;irtis, U lu)., A.M., May •■30"i', 177:.." ■^Jimnml nf tin: Praciiuistion shiill lie ilctcrniini'il i.n till' May tliat it is "agitated, if tliipc Coiiiitios sliall i-pi|iu'st tliat it lie ilefi-ncil to the "lU'xt ilay." — (Hiilr.t cflh,- Criwjri'xs, in tlu' Joiiriml nf thr lyoi-iiu iiil Cnii- (jresf, Tuesilay, 'I.ird of Blay, 1775.) period of the existence of that Congress, to secure that advantage and, thereby, if |)()ssible, to defeat the motion — "at the request of the Deputies of the City " and County of Albany and the Counties of " Ulster, Sufiblk, and Charlotte," it was " ORr)ERED, " That the same be deferred." * Although the Rule reipiired the Congress to resume the consideration of the motion on "the next day," the Rule was disregarded ; ' and, on the following day [Jii/ii' 1, 1775,] Mr. Kissam, with the leave of the Congress, withdrew the motion, "in order to " amend it." " On the second of June, the amended motion was submitted by Mr. Kissam, " in the words following, "to wit: Forasmuch as a reconciliation between " (ireat Britain and these Colonies, on constitutional principles, is essential to the well-being of both " countries, and will prevent the horrors of a Civil " War, in which this Continent is now about to be " involved : I move that a Committee be appointed " to pre])are a plan of such accommodation, and re- " port the same to this House." The revolutionary faction, led by John Morin Scott and Alexander JIcDougal, resolutely opposed the motion ; and the last-named, seconded by Abra- ham Brasher, moved (or the jjrevious (juestion, in or- der to defeat it; but only Ulster, Orange, Suffolk, and Duchess-counties favored the motion for the previous question ; and it was defeated — Philip Van Cortlandt, differing from all his asso- ciates from Westchester-county, voting with the rev- olutionary faction. The motion of Mr. Kissam was then carried, without any di.ssent, except that of Philij) Van Cortlandt, who recorded that dissent on the Joarnnl of tlic Coin/irss. Colonel Woodhull, of Sufiblk, one of those who had opposed the motion, then moved, as an amend- ment of the motion, the addition of these words: " That we may be ready, if we shall think it neces- " sary, to communicate our sentiments upon tiiatsub- ■' ject to our Delegates at Philadelphia ;" which was subsequently adopted, without a division, in the fol- lowing words : " Resolved, therefore. That, although " we would, by no means, presume to dictate to the " General Continental Ccmgress, yet it is highly nec- " essary that this House be pre|)ared to give our sen- " timents to our Delegates, in the said Congress,upon " such plan of accommodation." With the a])- j)ointinent of John Morin Scott, Isaac Low, Alexan- der McDougal, Benjamin Kissam, and Thomas Smitii, of the City of New York ; John Sloss Hobart, Colo- nel Nathaniel Woodhull, and Thomas Tredwell, of Suffolk ; Robert Yates and Peter Silvester, of the City and County of Albany ; Gouverneur Morris, of *.Jum-twl of till' I'lartiiruil rmiijnm, "."i lu)., P.M., May .30, 177.5." ■•.I„iini The principles on which that Plan was constructed and the methods which were proposed for the execu- tion of its provisions were so radically subversive of all the purposes for which Colonies were established and protected ; so .singularly presumptuous in claiming all the privileges and benefits enjoyed by English- men without assuming any of the burdens under which Englishmen were then staggering; so unac- countably inconsistent in conceding the atithority of the Parliament to regulate their Trade and to levy Duties on their Imports while, at the same time, they denied the authority of that Parliament to im- pose Taxes on them, for general purposes, in the same manner and to the same extent and for the same purposes that it imposed similar Taxes on Englishmen, in England ; so unduly arrogaut iu dictating to the Home Government and to the Parlia- ment what they should do and what they should not do — including, in the former, a removal of all those obstructions to the " illicit Trade" of the Colonists, which that Home Government and that Parliament had interposed — as the price of their indirect proffer of an abandonment of their rebellious movements and of their return to their duties, as snbjects of the Crown, that it is difficult to bring one's self to a belief that the framers and supporters of that pro- posed Plan were really sincere in proposing it. unles.s with the qualification that their enthusiasm and the seeming indifference of the Home and Colonial Governments had blinded them to its remarkable peculiarities, and induced them to regard the Colonists as something superior, in their political standing, to other subjects of the Crown — as something more than subjects, owing obedience to those in authority and to the Laws of the land. Such a Plan, had it been submitted to the Home Government and to the Parliament, would, un(]ue8tionably, have aggravated instead of conciliated, and have widened the breach which then separated the Colonies and the Mother Country, instead of closing it. It is serviceable, how- ever, to the cai'eful student of the history of that j>eriod, to indicate how mujch the Rebellion had already palled upon the senses of even ihose who were its local leaders ; how much a reconciliation wsis secretly hankered for, even among those who were blustering in fictitious bravei-y ; how much of hypoc- risy there was among those wlio were loudly pretend- ing to be "patriots," in harmony wiih similar "patriots" in each of the other Colonies, all of them zealously and noisily crowding the entire Continent into an open and unqualified Rebellion, while, at the same time, they were secretly determining, among themselves, by how slight a bond they were bound to {heir associates in crime, how delicately constructed 1 Jimmil i\f the I'rminciiil 0»igrtiis, 4 lu)., P. M., Dii; Martis, .Imii- 27, 177'>. were their honor and their patriotism, and at what price the Home Government could purchase their ad- herence and their "patriotism" and their sympathy with their compatriots, whenever that Home Govern- ment should incline to enter the market of " patriot- " ism," for such a purpose. At a very early period, the security of the pass at Kingsbridge appears to have attracted the attention of the revolutionary faction ; and measures were taken with the evident intention of throwing up some defensive works, at that point, for the protection of the City. Immediately after the receipt of intelligence con- cerning the raid of the Royal troops on Lexington and Concord, without any formal order from the Committee of One hundred, great numbers of men were employed in hauling the cannon from the City to Kingsbridge, in readiness for the work of intrench- ment;'' and on the fourth of May, the Conunittee "ordered, that Captain Sears, Captain Randall, and " Captain Fleming be a Committee to procure proper '•judges to go and view tlie ground at or near Kings- '■ bridge, and report to this Committee, with all "convenient speed, whether it will answer the pur- " poses intended by it"' — although they were not described, the " purposes " referred to were, evidently, for the protection of the City from any irruption, by land, from the country Towns. The j)ublished Proaedimjs of the Committee of (hie hundred, iu the City of New York, make no mention of the doings of that Committee ; and it is not proba- ble that it accomplished anything, in the way of forti- fy-ing Kingsbridge ; but, on the twenty-fifth of May, the Continental Congress agi-eed to the following Resolutions, " respecting New York," one of which relates to the defence of Kingsbridge. These Reso- lutions were in the following words : " 1. — Resolveb, That a Post be immediately tfiken " and fortified at or near King's-Bridge, in the Colony " of New-York ; and that the ground l)e chosen with "a particular view to prevent the communication "between the Citj^ of New- York and the country " from l)eing interrupted by land. " 2. — Resolved, that a Post be also taken in the " Highlands, on each side of Hudson's River, and Bat- " teries erected in such manner as will most effectual- " ly prevent any Vessels passing, that may be sent to " harass the Inhabitants on the borders of said River ; " and that experienced persons be immediately sent " to examine said River, in order to discover where it " will be most advisable and proper to obstruct the "Navigation. " 3.— Resolved, That the Militia of New-York be " armed and trained, and in constant readiness to act 3 Proceedings of the Ckmncil of the Colony of New York, " Monday, May 1, " 1775.-' JlfiMM/tn of the Committee of .'' THE AMERICAN RE " at a moment's wfiriiinp; ; ancVthnt a number of Men " be iinmeiliati'.ly embotlied, and kept in that (-ity, and so disposed of as to give protection to the Inhabit- "antii, in case any insult should be ofiered by tiie " Troops that may land there, and to prevent any " attempts that may be made to gain possession of j "the City, and int<'rru])t its iutereourse with the " country. "4."— [Resoi.vkd.] "That it be left to the Provincial "Congress of New-York to determino the number of "men sufticient to occupy the several Posts ahove- " mentioned, and also that already recommended to be " taken at or near Lake George, a.s well as to guard the " City, I'roriiltil, the whole do not exceed the number " of three thousand men, to be commanded by such " Oflicers as shall be thereunto appointed by said " Provincial Congress, and to be governed by such " Rules and Regiilations as shall be established by said "Congress, until fartlicr order is taken by this Oon- "gress; J'rovUIrd, also, that if the said Provincial " Congress should be of opiuiou that the number j)ro- " posed will not be sufhcient for the several services " above recommended, that the said Congress report " their sentiments upon this subject to this Congress, "as soon as may be. '■ .')." — [Resoia'ku.] " That it be recommended to " the said Provincial Congress, that in raising those " Forces, they allow no Bounties or Clothing, aud " that their Pay shall not exceed the establishment "of the New-England Colonies. "6." — [Resoi.vep.] "That it be further recom- " mended to the Provincial Congress, aforesaid, that " the Troops be enlisted to serve until the last day "of December next, unless this Congress shall direct " that they be s()oner disbanded." ' On the following day, [May 26, 1775,] the Conti- nental Congress further " Reholved, That it be recom- " mended to the Congrojis aforesiiid, to persevere the " more vigorously iu preparing for their defence, as it " is very uncertain whether the earnest endeavours of " this Congress to accommodate the unhappy diJierences " between Great Britain and the Colonies, by concilia- " tory measures, will be successful ; " and, in addition, it "Ordered, That the above Resolves, respecting " New-York, be transmitted by the President in a let- " ter, to the Provincial Congress of New- York ; and " that it be particularly recommended to said Con- " gress, by the President, not to publish the foregoing " Resolves, but to keep them as secret as the nature of " the cii.se requires.'" - On the twenty-ninth of May, the Resolutions I which had been thus adopted by the Continental Congress, were received by the Provincial Congress ; ■* and on the following day, on motion of .Tohn Morin 1 Journal nf the CoAlinmtal Congreff, " Thursday, May 2.i, 17T.>.'" 5 Jmtmal of thf C/>ntint*ntat Cngr»»«, " Friday, May 2H, 177.5." Jimi-vnl of the Pi-nrittcuil CongrrMi^ *' Dies Lun.'V^, 4 ho., P.M., May 2ii'>i, 177.1." VOLUTION, 1774-1783. 275 Scott, of the City of New-York, they were taken into coasideration — that portion of them which directed the fortifying of Kiugsbridge, w;ls referred to Cap- tain Richard Montgoniery, of Ducheas-county, llenry Glenn' and Robert Yates, of AJbany-county, and Col- j quel .lames Van Cortlandt aud Colonel James I Holmes, of Weslchest^r-county, with orders " to view ' " the ground at or near King's Bridge, and re])ort to " this Congress whether the ground near King's "Bridge will admit of making a fortification there, " that will be tenable ; and at what particular place "the ground will admit of making the best and "most tenable fortification : and that they call to "their assistance such persons as they shall think , " neces.sary, aud make re])()rt to this Congress, with all " convenient speed : " that portion of them which directed the erection of fortifications in the High- lands, on the Hudson-river, wjus referred to Colonel James Clinton and Christopher Tappan, both of Ul- ster-county, with orders to " take to their Jissistance "^such persons as they shall think necessary ; to go to " the Highlands, and view the banks of Hudson's " river there ; aud to report to this Congress the most " proper place for erecting one or more fortifications ; "aud, likewise, an estimate of the expense that will " attend erecting the same." * Both theiie Resolutions were initiatory of prolonged and not always harmonious and agreeable proceed- ings, both without and within the Provincial Con- gress and both without and within the Congre.ss of the Continent, all of which can be considered with greater propriety iu the local publications concerning the Towns of Kingsbridge aud Cortlandt and in the general publications concerning the War of the Ameri- can Revolution, than in a general Hisfary nf the County of Wr-if Chester; and, for that reason and with this introductory send-off, the construction of those military works to which the liesolutions referred will receive no further attention, in this narrative. On the thirty -lirst of May, in its liirther considera- tion of the Resolutions of the Continental Congress, which have been already laid before the reader, the Provincial Congress resolved, " that it be recommended " to the Inhabitants of this Colony, in general, im- " mediately to furnish themselves with necessary arms "and ammunitions; to use all diligence to perfect "themselves in the military art; and, if necessary, to " form themselves into Companies, for that purpose, "until the further order of the Congress;" and it ordered the Resolution to be printed in the news- i papers and in handbills. At the same time, it met the call of the Continental Congress, for men to oc-' cupy the proposed posts at Kingsbridge and in the Highlands, f()r the protection of the City of New York, and for tluit of Lake George, referred to in the third and fourth Resolutions of that Congress, by re- solving that it " would use all possible diligence in * Jmimut of n.- Prnrinrial Omgrem, " 5 ho., P.M., May nO, >77.'.."' 27G HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " embodying men according to tiie said Resolutions ; " and by appointing a Committee " to report an ar- " rangement of the troops to be embodied for the " (iofence of this Colony ; and to report such Rules " and Re(j\ilat\onx as would be proper to be established "by this Congress, for the government of su(;h " troops." ' The doings of the Provincial Congress were, of course, entirely in the interest of the Rebel- lion. ******** Early in the Summer, as has been stated, the Con- tinental Congress ordered the enlistment of a large armed force, of which three thousand were to be raised and put into the field by the Colony of New York. These troops were to be commanded by such Officers as should be thereunto api)ointed by the Provincial Congress ; they were to be governed by such Rulea and Regulations as that Congress should establish for that purpose ; they were to be mustered into the service, to serve no longer than the last day of the succeeding December ; and as there was no enemy before them, and as little probability existed that there would be any one to molest them, during their short term of service, the proffered opportunity to take the field, as Continental Soldiers, appeared to be very inviting — it seemed, in fact, to ])romise what would be little else than an organized picnic-party, for the succeeding Summer and Autumn and early Winter months. There were, of course, plenty of applications from those of the well-born, among the revolutionary fac- tion and from among those who had been instrumental in bringing the Livingstons and the Morrises and others into authority, for each of the offices, in each of the four Regiments into which the levy on New York was arranged ; but there was an evident back- wardness, among the masses, from the beginning, in enlisting for "the private station;" there was a greater anxiety, among those who did enlist, con- cerning their pay and bounty and " under clothes,'' than for the welfare of the Colony ; and, generally, there ^vas very little inclination, any where, among those who had them, to exchange their peaceful oc- cupations and their domestic comforts and their quiet homes, under such circumstances as then existed, for a distant encampment or a distant military post and the sometimes laborious and not always well-supplied and always irregular lives of soldiers, in garrison as well as in the field. Of the four Regiments thus ordered, on the Conti- nental Establishment, only the Fourth, or Duchess, appears tohave had any connection with Westchester- county — James Holmes, of Bedford, an experienced Journal of the Provincial Cmigress, " Die Mercurii, 9 ho., A.M., May '3l8t, 1775." i Jourtud of the ConlinenUil Congress, " Thur.iday, May 2.1, and Friday, ' May 26, 177.0 — pages 274, 275, ante. soldier of the former War, was its Colonel;' and Philip Van Cortlandt, of Cortlandt Manor, who held, also, a Royal Commission of Major in the Colonial Militia, was its Lieutenant-colonel ;* Barnabas Tut- hill, of Southold, Suffolk county, was its ]\Lijor ; Benjamin Chapman was its Quarter-master ; and Ebenezer Haviland was its Surgeon.'' Of the ten Companies of which the Regiment was composed, thr.ee were largely from Westchester-county — of one of these Jonathan Piatt, of Bedford, was Captain,' David Dan, of Poundridge, was First Lieutenant;'* and Manning Bull, of , was Second Lieutenant: of another of those Companies, Daniel Mills, of Bed- 3 James Holmes was the grandson of one of the original proprietors and settlers of the Town of Bedford. He was born in that Town, in 1737 : and a Captain in the ■\rniy, during the W'ar with France, in which he gained great credit. He was elected to the Provincial Convention for the appointment of Delegates to the Continental Congress of 1774 ; and he was a member of the Provincial Congress, by whom he was made Colonel of this Regiment. He went with his Heginient to the northern frontier, and occupied Ticonderoga, very much to his disgust ; quarrelled with General Schuyler, who commanded in that Department ; declined to continue in the service, after tlio term of the enlistment of his com- mand had expired; became a Loyalist; took the Lieutenant-colonelcy of the Corps of the Westchester-county Refugees; continued to live in Bedford, until about 1810, when he removed to New Havon, where he died, on the eighth of July, 1824, aged eighty-seven years. An extended notice of hin\ may be feeen in Jones's Hattonj of A>w York during the Ilernhilionari/ liar, ii., 3.''4 -3:iG ; and, in his Notes to that His- tory (ii., 618-(121.) Mr. de Lancey has re-produced, in full, an exceed- ingly interesting autobiographical tract, from the Colonel's own pen. < I'hilip Van Cortlandt, eldest son of Pierre Van Cortlandt, was born in the City of New York, in 1749 (?), and was a graduate of King's (now Columbia) College, in the class of 17.i8 (?). He was a Surveyor and a Country Merchant and Miller ; a Major in the AVestchester-county Militia, under Covernor Tryon ; and a member of the Provincial Con- gress by whom he was made Lieutenant-colonel of this Regiment. He continued in the military service, until the close of the War of the Revo- lution ; after which he was one of the (Joniniissioners of J'orfeitures ; represented Wcstchester-coiinty in the Assembly, 1788-'9, 1789-'9(); the Southern District, in the Senate, 1791-'4 ; his District, in Congress, 1793- 18119; and died on the twenty-first of November, 1831.— (Bolton's llistorij of Westrh fter-coimtii, original edition, i., 58-60 ; (/le «ame, second edition, i., 111-112; etc.) 5 Barnabas Tuthill was a resident of Southold; had not joined the Regiment, which was then at Ticonderoga, as late .is the first of .Septem- ber, when he wa-s in New Vork City, "unable to proceed for want of "money to pay his expenses." He appears to have returned to the ser- vice, in 1776 ; but, during the Summer, he was dismissed from the Army, at his own request. — {Journal of the Prorincial Congress, "4 ho., P.M., "September Isf, 1775 ;" General McDongnl to Robert I'ates, " Tonkers, "21 October, 1776.") c The Roster of the entire Regiment may be seen in the Historical Man- uscripts relating to the War of the Itn-olntion—MilitUTy Committee, xw., .531— in the office of the .Secretary of State, at ,\lliany. ' Jonathan I'latt was an aged man, whom Mr. Bolton has erroneously made the great-grandfather of Hon. Lewis C. Piatt of White Plains ; he was Mr. Piatt's grand-Uncle. lie was elected a Delegate to the Pro- vincial Convention called to elect Deputies to the Continental Congress of 1774 ; he was a member of the first County Committee of Westchester- county, in 177.') ; and a member of the fourth Provincial Congress, or, as it was called after a while, the Provincial Convention— that which de- "clared the Independence of New York from the King of Great Britain, which had not been done by the Congress, at Philadelphia, on the fourth of July, 1776. "David Dan was a member of the first County Committee of Westches- ter-county, in 1775, and a member of the Town Committee of Pound- ridge, in 1776. He was appointed to the command of a Company, in Colonel Thomas's Regiment, in August, 1776. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 277 ford, was Captain ; ' Elijah Hunter, of the same Town, was First Lieutenant; - and Jolin Bayley, of , was Second Lieutenant:'' of the remaining Com- pany, Ambrose Horton, apparently from the White Plains, was Captain ;* David Palmer, of , was First Lieutenant : * and Samuel Tredwell Pell, of ' Captain Daniel Mills continued in the service, after the Regiment was disbanded, at the close of the year, serving as a Captain in Colonel Van Scliaick'8 Regiment of the New York Line, in the Continental Army. 'Elijah Hunter was originally named for Second Lieutenant, with Samuel Haight, subsequently Sheriff of the County, us First Lieutenant. He was a member of the County Coniniitlee^ representing lletiford, 1770- 7 ; tfubst*quently became a Captain in Van Cortlandt's Regiment ; and left the service at the close of 1776. ■■•John Bayley evidently left the Regiment before it went into active service, since, in August, 177.5, Miles Oakley, a member of the firet (^uuty Conuniltee, was appointed in his place, leaving tlie service at the end of the year. The following paper, with the names of the men enlisted into this Company, is taken from the original manuscript, among the Higtorical Mditmcriplfi relating to the War of the Itevolution : MiVUarij Ifelunts, xxvii., •266 ; and will be interesting to tliose who have descended from the older families of Bedford : " BEAilroRn, July 2!lth, 1775. ".1 lietnrn of the Men inlutted bif Daniel Mills^ Capt. atid Elijah Hunter firitt Lent. / ' Abijah Dan, Abijah Woed, " Jonathan Weeks, John thomas, " Willis major wilks, Lewis Miller, *' John feris. .lames trowbridg. ".lames Raymond, .Jun' Joseph Clarke, Jun' ' John Biul, .Tolin ellit, Jun"" ' Amos Roberts, .lanies Cannady, ' Henry Rich, .loliu Gosseper, " Abram Nickels, James Jlillei', ' Nathanel Smith, Nathan Holmes, ' Mosis Higgins, John Runnelds, * ebenesor weeb, William Miller, ' Charles parsons, Daniel Holmes, ' .\nibres Benedick, Jeremiah Lane, ' James Bennet, Cidileon .Smith. ' Daniel McClean, Zephaniah Milller, ' Lemuel Light, Isaac titus. ' James Mills, John Daniels, * Thoniiis Uoldiog, John Still, * Joseph Sears, George Garret, ' Lowran Brinney, Holmes astin, * newman wayrin, newman betts, ' Timothy Conner, John Dayly, ■ Henry Noole, Shubel Cuuninggame " .John Cuuninggame, Patrick Cuhana. " Total 50. " To Peter V. B. LiviNOSTOS, Esq' " }*re«ident, of ye New York Provincial Con/freM.*^ < There is some reason for supposing that Ambrose Horton wiis im- ported from Southold, in Suffolk-county, to take the command of a Com- pany in this Regiment ; but, wherever he may have originated, he eulisteanied them. ^Journal of the Continental Congress, " Thursday, May 26, and Friday, " May 26, 1775," pages 274, 27.5, ante. ^Journal of the Provincial Congress, " Die Dunie, 4 ho., P.M., May 29th, " 1775." '0 Journal of the Provincial Congress, " Die Veneris, 9 ho., A.M., July 7, "1775 ;" ie JIartis. 9 ho., A.M., August 22, "177.")." 2 Votes of thf. MilUia Embodyed in ye PrecinH of Che Ynnkerf and of oji- cer» names this 24 August, 1775. — HMnriciil Mumiscrqitf, etc. : MHilanj Jteturns, xxvi., 23 ; xxvii., 263. 3 " Wf.st< h>:ster Oov.s-tv, ss. " William Haiiley, of tlie said Couiitv, yeoman, jxTSoiially appeaiMl I of the Company, and had received only twelve of the sixty votes which were cast for that office;* and, of course, the Committee of Safety of the County transmittecl the affidavit to the Provincial Con- i gress, promising to supplement what w;us then i sent with evidence that Cock had "spoken very dis- I "respectfully of the Congress;"' and invitingthat body ! to withhold the Commission to which Cock was en- ■ titled under the provisions of the Congress's own enactment.^ Six days afterwards, fifty-nine of the ' Inhabitants of Yonkers jjresented a Petition to the ■ Committee of Safety, justifying their action in elect- I ing Cock as their Captain, and asking that he might 1 be commissioned, as such;" but Isaac Green, one of ' "before the Committee of Safety for the Ciiunty aforesaid, and beiof; ] "duly sworn on the Holy Evangelists of the Almighty God, saith that *'lie the De|)oneiit betn^; appointed one of the Sub-Ck>nimittee for the j " superintending the signing of the General AMofialion of this Province, ! "carried the sanie to one, .lohn Cock, of the Vonkei's, in said County, I "and asked the said John Cock to sign the siinie ; he, the said .lohn "Cork taking the jien in his hand uttered the following words: ' I sign "'this with my hand, but not with my heart, for I would not have " ' signed it li.id it iKit been for my wife and family's sake : ' and this he "several times rt'peated in the hearing of him the Deponent. Arid " further the Deponent Kiith not. " Wll.J.HM IlADI Ey. , "Sworn the nth Sept., 177.'>, " before me, I " Gii.BT Drake." * Vole* iif the MilUia Embodyed, etc. — JtiMorieal Mann»cript', etc., MUi- ; litiy llelurm, xxvi., 23; xxvii., 263. s LetUr from fiUbert Drake, Chairman, to John H'lring, Chairman of tlie OmmUlee of Safely, nt Neir i'ork; " Wiin e-Plaixs, .Sept. 11th, 1775."' Journal of the Commillee of .i^ifety, "Die Lunse, 9 ho., .\.M., .Septeni- "berlB, n-.l." j The Petition thus presented has been preserved ; and the following I has been copied from it— Ki«torieoi Manuscriptt, etc., PetHionf, xxxi., 101. 1 "To THE Hovb'' The Pbovi.kciai, Conobess or the Province of Sew I "York in the Cm or New York CoxveniI — Ob in their Reces.«, I " To THE HoxciM' The Committee or Saftet. ' "The Honorable Petition of the Inhabitants of the Precinct of the I "lower Y'oukers in the County of Wejitchester Humbly Sheweth : } "That your Honourable House have made a Resolve and Published " the same Recommending to the Inhabitants of every Town Manner ' " Precinct & District within the Province aforesaid, to meet nominate i "and appoint Captains and Other Officers To form Themselves as Com- ; " pany» of Militia. j ".\nd whereas the Inhabitants of this Precinct Did meet agreeable to ' "your said Resolve On the Twenty-fourth Day of August Last, under 1 "the Inspection of the fomuiitee for that District Did by a very great 1 •• JIajority as by the List will appear. Did Nominate and appoint Mr. " .lohn Cock of the said Precinct for his known Skill and ability in the ' " Military Discipline and for other good Cause, appointe-l him Captain I " of the said Company for the District aforesaid. I "And whereas we are informed that a Complaint hath been made to " the Commitee by a few of the Inhabitants against the said Mr. John "Cock out of Spite and Malice and as we conceive what has been aleg* "against him was before the .'Signing the Association, we are well " assured that Since his Signing the said .\s80ciation no person Can ac " cuse him of breaking the same by any ways or means whatever. " Therefore we the Petitioners and Sul>scribers Do Humbly beg the " Indulgence of This Honourable House To Grant unto M'. John Cock i " the Commission of Captain for the Conijiany aforesaid as we are Con- ! "vinced he was chosscn agreeable to your said Resolve and your Peti- '• tionei-s as in Duty Itound shall ever piay. THE AMERICAN llEVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 279 those who Imd voted for Cock, at the Election, was induced to join witli Goorpe Hadley, the latter in a second Affidavit, sliowinp; that Cock "had damned the " Provincial Congress of this Colony, and spoke dis- " respectfully of them ;" and these were laid before the Colonial Committee of Safety, in opposition to the Petition of the fifty-nine and to the claim of the Captain-elect. The result was probably foreseen by the Petitioners and their successful candidate — why should the carefully expressed will of filty-uine respec- table men, declared in conformity with the published terms of the Congress itself, be permitted to stand in the way of a Van Cortlandt, the latter with nothing else than two e.r-parfe Affidavits to sustain the evi- dently ridiculous charge of wrong-doitig in the suc- cessful canilidate? and why, also, should those other successful candidates who had, also, been elected by the same great majority and at the same time, with- out even the semblance of an accusation against either of them, be permitted to receive their Com- missions? It was true, that the latter had not been known to have spoken disrespectfully of either the Axsodfttion or of the Congress : it was true, that they had received nearly five-sixths of the votes which were Ciist: it was true, that the Election had been held under the inspection of the proper Committee: it was true, that every requirement of the Congress's ' Charles Tylor, John Devoe, ' Miiitin I'ost. Jacob Post, ' .liiiues Muiiio, Henry Brown, ' AiitliJ Alliuie, Henrey Taylor, ' Kilwani U.vor, Authoney Archer, ' li(Mijauiin Farrington, Basal Archer, * William Uose, Thomas Oakley, ' Hour} pri'slier. Jonathan Fowler, * Thouius Furington, his Abm X I'ost, ' Jnniea Kii h, mark " Gilbert Brown, hid liig Dennis X Poet, 'Tlionios X Tii>pit, murk mark, his " Samuel Laurence, William X I'ost, ' tliunuw Merrell, mark ' Samuel Williaiiia, Robert Brown, ' Fredrii'k lirowii, Danel Ueen, " Israel I nilerliill, Steiihen Bastino, '• David Oakley, Jmi', Bonj'" Arsdan, '.losejih Oakley, Jiin', Henry Norris, " George Crawford, John Gucvnau, " Moses Oakley, Thomas Kich, "Abralium Rich, Klijh taylor. Matliioud Archer, Jacob Taylor, bia James Cniwturd, " Kzk X Brown, KInathan Taylor, mark, Isrcl I'osI, bis his ".\brahaiii X Aaten, Lewis X post, mark. mark " Kobert Farriugton, John Warner, his Francis .Smith, "John X Odle, Jordan Norris, mark frederick Vennilyt his John Corl right. "Ab"> X Oille, KdwanI Cortrighf, mark IhiW£k Yunkkks, Se|il' 1;">, 177'i. own enactments had been duly observed : it was also true, however, that they were obnoxious to "a few "of the Inhabitants," and, therefore, without an ac- cusation, without a hearing, without a shadow of authority, even in the elastic law of the Congress, the expressed will of the Company was disregarded and the pretended principles of the Revolution were thrown aside, by the refusal of the Committee of Safety to recognize either of the successful candidates, and by the issue of an order for a new Election,' which, if it was held, was not held until the follow- ing March. With "the letter of the Militia Regulntiuns," as has been said, there did not appear to be any extended discontentment; but with the arbitrary conduct of some of those who were to oversee the execution of it — the instance, at Yonkers, being only one of several — there was, very reasonably, much dissatisfaction among those, being men from whom duties were ex- acted, who were, nevertheless, regarded and treated as if they were not men, and as if they possessed no social or political privilege which those who were bet- ter born were legally obliged to recognize and re- spect. In a community, such as that which constituted Colonial We.stchester-county, which was already known and distinguished because of its consistent con- servatism and, therefore, because of its backwardness in promoting the cause of the Rebellion, such a ty- rannical exercise of political authority as had been seen in connection with the Election of Militia Officers, at Yonkers, by those who were, themselves, exercising only an authority which had been usurped and which was held and exercised without due war- rant in law, was everything else than conciliatory, and was far better adapted to arouse and to inflame t Journal of the Committee of Safefy, " Die lUnrtu, S bo., A.M., Septoni- "bor 19th, 1775." The following letter, addressed by the tlolonial ('omuiittce of Safety to Frederic Van Cortlandt and others. Informing them of the remarkable residt (if this Election, in Yonkers, will lntere.st those who desire to learu the inside history of the Revolution, in Westchester-county : " In COMMITTKK OK S.vri';Tv, "Nkw-Yokk, Sept. 19th, 1775. "Genti.emkn : "Having considered your report, and also the report of "your County Comniiltee. concerning the Election of .lohn Oox, as " a Captain of the Companr of Militia at Yonkers. We have determined ' him to be disigualified for a Commission, nut only because at the time " of his signing the AmiciiiUim he declared it to be an involuntary act, but "also bocaiise he lias spoke most contemptuously ol the Provincial Con- " greas. .\nil in order that the other Officers in the Company may have "a chance of promotion, which cannot be dune acconling to the letter of "the Mililui HnjiilaliiiK, you are hereby desired t'> cause a now Electior. "to be nuuli? of all the Oflicers of the t\)mpany, pursuant to the said " Uegnluiimi, taking care to give public notice that the said John Cocks " cannot be admitted to any office whatsoever. " We are respectfully. Gentlemen, " Your very humble Servants, " By order of the Committee of Safety, " JoUN IIakivo, Chiiinimn. ■'To FlU'.llKUIl- V. CoRTI.VNnT, BR.\.r.\MIN •■DllAKK, StKI'HKN SnKKKN, TU"M AS Em- " Mii.vs, Wii.i uM Btrrs am> Wii r.nM "lUni.KV, at Yonkeix, Wi 'it. ln -i. r " 280 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the passions of those who were loyal to the universally recognized Sovereign and obedient to the public Laws of the land, than to soothe them. But the farmers of the County were generally peaceable men, preferring to endure a wrong instead of resenting and resisting it by force; and they appear to have generally proceed- ed, therefore, to the election of Officers, in the reor- ganized Militia of the County, with much unanimity and general good feeling. The first to respond to the call of the Provincial Congress, by the election of its Militia Officers, was the Borough Town of Westches- ter, where, on the twenty-fourth of August, John Oakley was elected to the command of the local Com- pany, * with Nicholas Berrian, for its First Lieuten- ant ; ^ Isaac Leggett, for its Second Lieutenant ; and Frederic Philipse Stevenson, for its Ensign. '■' Subse- quently, when West Farms and the Manor of Ford- ham were separated from the body of the Town and made a separate and distinct Beat, Nicholas Berrian was elected to the command of the new Company, with Gilbert Taylor, for its First Lieutenant; Daniel Devoe, for its Second Lieutenant; and Benjamin Val- entine, for its Ensign. * 1 John Oakley represented Westchester, in the County Committee, from May, 1776, until May, 1777. 2 Nicholas Berrian was one of those, at Fordham and West Farms, who, in September, 1775, petitioned for the establshment of a Company, in that portion of the Town, separate from the other portions of it, {Histori- cal Mumwcripls, etc.: Petitions, xxxi. lU) ; and, in October of the same year, when that Petition was granted, he was elected to the command of the new Company, (Hisloriad Manuscript, etc. Militari) lielums, xxvi., 234.) s Historical Manuscripts relating to the ll or of the lievolution : MUilAirij Ketums, xxvi.,23; xxvii., 263. * Historical Mamiscripts relating to the War of the SevohUion: Military Hetums, xxvi., 234. The following list of the names of those, from West Farms and the Manor of Fordham, who were summoned to meet at Westchester ; who petitioned for the organization of the new Company ; and who were its members, when it was organized, may properly find a place in this narrative. It was copied from the original manuscript, {Historical Man- uscripts, Petitions, xxxi., 114.) Nicholas Berrian, James McKay, Isaac Valintine, Eobert Campbell, Peter Valintine, Eden Hunt, John Stevens, Isaac Hunt, Benjamin Curser [Corsaf] James .\rcher. Abraham Dyckman, Samuel Embree, Jun', John Turner, Edward Harris, Benjamin Valentine, John Collard, his Cornelius Jacobs, Georg X Philpet, hezekiah Ward, mark Tunis Garrison, Isaac Valintine, Junior, Isack Cant, Peter Bussing, Juner, Gilbert Taylor, Peter Bussing, Robert Gilmer, Abraham Wils, Benjamin Archer, Jun', Benjamin Curser, Jr., Daniel Devoe, Ju', Hendrick Ryer, John Embree, Sen% John Lint, [Lentf] Jacob Lent, John Kyer, his Isaac Corser, [Corsaf] Abram X Lent, Isaac Corser, Ju', mark tunus Leforge, Dennis Ryer, Phillip Hunt, Jacob Valentine, Stephen Embree, Abraham garison. Nathaniel Lawreuc, .Tames Grobe, Peter Devoe, John Embree, Jun', In the Manor of Cortlandt, there were eight Dis- tricts or Beats, which appear to have been the same, in their several territorial limits, as those under the former arrangement ; and these elected the following Officers for the respective Companies: The District formerly commanded by Francis Lent elected James Kronkhyte, for its Captain ; Abraham Lamb, for its First Lieutenant ; Staats De Grote, for its Second Lieutenant ; and David Peuore, for its Ensign. The District formerly commanded by Barton Un- derbill elected Gilbert Van Cortlandt, for its Captain; Daniel Hains, for its First Lieutenant ; ^ James Taller, for its Second Lieutenant ; and Haramanos Gardinear minor, or "Third," for its Ensign. The District formerly commanded by Jeremiah Drake elected Gilbert Lockwood, for its Captain ; John Drake, for its First Lieutenant; ' Joshua Drake, for its Second Lieutenant ; ' and Peter Carman, for its En- sign. ^ The District formerly commanded by David Mon- tros declined to make a new Election ; and its Officers under the former arrangement appear to have been retained and to have received new Commissions. The District formerly commanded by Ebenezer Theall elected Andrew Brown, for its Captain ; Samuel Haight, for its First Lieutenant;* John Chrissey Mil- ler, for its Second Lieutenant ; and Solomon Purdy, for its Ensign. The northern division of the District formerly com- manded by Levi Baily elected Nathaniel Delevan, for its Captain ; Thomas Nicholls, Junior, for its First James Swaim, Thomas Cromwell, Nazareth Breuer, Gerrardus Cromwell Thomas Hunt, Obadiah Hide, Abram Leggett, John Cursor, William Leggett, Sirion Williams, John Leggett, Jun', John Ryer, Jun', Robert Hunt, Juu', Jacob Cliappel, Cornelius Leggett, John Garrison, Mr. Woods, John Jacobs, John Hedger, Thomas Dogherty, Thomas Hedger, John Clark, Steiilicn Edwards, John Devoe, James Rock, John Blizard, George Higby, John Walbrin, .Jacob Hunt, John Warnick, Levi Hunt, Thomas Gemble. Jeremiah Regen, 5 Darid Hains did not sign the Association until the day of the Elec- tion. John Drake did not sign the Association until the day of the Elec- tion. ' Joshua Drake did not sign the Association until the day of the Elec- tion. He was subsequently made an Ensign in the Continental Service ; but soon became tired and resigned, and brought influences to bear in order to secure a Lieutenancy in the same service, in which latter opera- tion, however, he does not seem to have been successful. 8 Peter Carman, also, did not sign the Association until the day of the Election. s Samuel Haight represented Westchester-county, in the Assembly of the State, 1782-'3, 1784, 1789- 90, 1791. 1792 ; he wa« Sherifi of the County, 1792-'6; and he wa« one of the Senators from the Southern District, 1797-1800. In 1800, he represented the Southern District in the Council of Appointment. '0 Nathaniel Delevan represented Westchester-county in the .\ssembly of the State, 1781-2. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 281 Lieutenant; Titus Runnels, for its Secontl Lieutenant; and Abraham Furdy, for its Ensign. ' Tiie southern division of the same former District elected (rideon Selah \_Ser/ci/ .'} for its Captain, Samuel Lawrence for its First Lieutenant; Caleb Hobby, foritsSecond Lieu- tenant;- and Abraham Todd, for its Ensign. The District formerly commanded by Joseph Strang ' elected John Hyatt, for its Captain ; ^ John Drake, for its First Lieutenant; ' Obediah I'urdy, for its Second Lieutenant; and Joseph Horton, for its Ensign.'' The eight Com]>anie8, in the Manor of Cortlandt, whicli were thus reorganized and re-ottieered, were known as the North Hattalion of Westchester-county, of which, soon al'terwards, Pierre Van Cortlandt was made Colonel," tJilbert Drake its I>ieutenant-colonel,' Joseph Strang its First Major, '' Ebenezer Purdy its Second Major, John Cooley its Adjutant, and Isaac Norton its Quartermaster." The District of Eastchester elected Stephen Sneden, for its Captain;'- Thomas Pinkuey, for its First Lieu- ' Aliraliaiii I'linly was a meiiilxr of the County (,'oniniittef, represent- in;; the llanor of Cortlamlt, in ITTli-", iHislnrirnl jl/.oiimn/i/s, etc. : Mi'irflliiui-niis I'liju rs, xxxviii., 309.) In April, 1770, C'lileb Hobliy, who wiis said to have been a " Gentle- "inan," received a Coniniission from the C'ontineiitiil Congress, as FirRt Lieutenant in "the Firet Regiment of New York Forre.s," {Hixloiinil .1/.i//iis/.«, etc. : Milil'irii IMimis, xxvii., liH) ; atiil he appears to have joined the Seventh, or Captain Hait's, Company, {HMmiinl Maniiscripls, etc. ; Militurij Otinmisxium^ .xxv., IG."), BVH.) Soon afterwards, it was said that -lie nnd the Second Iiieutenant and the Ensign of the Company [Unit's nr lli/alt'x] " wisli to decline tlie service ; they will be no loss to "it." {HitftorU-ul M'tiiHsrrijits^ etc. : MiliUirif Coiiimittee's Pttprrs^ x.vv., 488.) .Joseph Strang was snbsetpieiitly nia ,JanJ, 1777.") 6, lohn Praku was a sou of Gilbert Drake, Chairman of the County t'unnnittee. '■> Josei>h Horton did not sign the iVifiVm until the day of the Elec- tion. ■ Pierre Van Corllanilt was sul>sei|uently a niend>er of the Second Pro- vincial (.'ongre.-*", 177.'>-i!, and Chairman of its Committee of Safety, Jan- uary ami February, 177t; ; a member of the Thiiil Provincial Congress, 177ii; of the Fourth Provincial Congress, 177li; of the Convention of the Slate of New York, 177t;-7 ; of the First Council ot Sjifety, 1777, of w hicli lie was the President ; a Senator from the Southern District, 1777 ; President of the Convention of the State, 1777; Lieutenant-Governor of the State, 1777-17!)r> ; and died on the first of May, 1819, aged ninety- four years. GillKrt Drake wa.s Chairman of the County Committe<>, in 1775-(; ; a member of the Second Provincial Congress, 177.i-f> ; of the Third Pro- vincial Congress, 1770; and of the Fourth Provincial Congress, 1776-7. 'Joseph Strang ha>l held the command, uniler the Colonial Govern- ment, of the District conimandcHi, uiiiler the reorganization, by Captain John Hyatt. Elieiiezer Piinly was a inenil«er of the County Committee, from the Manor of Cortlandt, 177(>-'7 ; he representiil \Vestcliester County in the .\ssombly of the State, 1779-'8tl, 1782-':!, 1784, 1784-'3, 1787, 1791, 1792, 1795 ; he was one of the Senators from the Southern District, 1801-'6 ; and County Judge in 1797-'8. " Isaac Norton was a member of the County Committee, from the Manor of Cortlandt, 177ti-'7. >s Stephen Sneden represented the Town of Ea-stchester, in the County Committee, 1776-7. 20 tenant ; " Daniel Sebring, for its Second Lieutenant; " and William Pinkney, for its Ensign.'' For some reason which is not now known, a new iOlection was held in the following March, when Thomas Pinkney was made its Captain, William Pinkney its First Lieutenant, John Sneden its Second Lieutenant, and William Reed its Ensign."'' New Rochelle and the Manor of Pelhaiit, united, formed a District or Beat ; and it elected Jo.seph Drake, for its Captain;" James Willis, for its First Lieutenant; '" and David Guion, for its Second Lieu- tenant. It did not elect an Ensign. The Manor of Philipsborough included six distinct Districts or Beats — the Upper, the East, the Lower, the Yonkers, the Tarrytown, and the Associated Com- pany, in the upper part of tlie Manor — and these elected the following Officers in their several Dis- tricts : The Upper District elected Abraham Ledew, for its Captain; " Benjamin Brown, for its First Lieutenant ; John Relyea, for its Second Lieutenant ; and John Oakley, for its Ensign. John Relyea having declined the proffered Second Lieutenancy, Jonas Arsor [Orsor f] was subsequently elected to fill the vacancy."' The East Company elected David Davids, for its Captain : Benjamin Vermilyea, for its First Lieutenant; Gilbert Dean, for its Second Lieutenant ; and Gabriel Reguaw, \_Eequa for its Ensign. '' Captain-elect Davids appears to have declined the proffered office ; and, at a subsequent Election, the Company elected Benjamin Vermilyea, for its Captain ; Gilbert Dean, for its First Lieutenant; and William Fushie, \_Foi-shcc to its Second Lieutenancy; Ensign Requa evidently retaining the Office to which he hatl been originally appointed." The Lower Company elected Isaac Vermilyea, for its Thomas Pinkney was promoted to the command of the Company, in March, 177(1. Daniel Sebring represented the Town of Eastchester, in the County Committee, 1776-'7. 15 William Pinkney was promoted to the First Lieutenancy in March, 1776. ^'^ Uintoririil Miiniiscripis reltiliiiij to the War of the Hendiitum : Militui ii Itrtiirnx, xxvii., 144. 1- Joseph Drake was a member of the Firstand Second Provincial Con- gresses, by the former of whom he was made Colonel of the First West- chester-county Regiment, {Uinlorical Manuscript*, etc. : MUilnnj Keturns xxvi., 1:5 ) '8 A very interesting .Vflidavit, made by Lieutenant Willis, on the sixth of .Vugtist, 177(>, illustrative of the unpopularity of Colonel John Thomas, Junior, may bo seen in the llislurical Stamtacripts, etc. ; Mitrellone'iiis I'liperx, xxxix., 347. " .\braham Ledew represented the Manor of Philipsborough in the County Committee, in 1776-'7. This name was written, elsewhere, La Donx. ^ lliKlorii nl M(iHa»cripl» relating to the War of the lieivliitiun : SlUUunj Retiirm, xxvi., 140. =1 Gabriel Rcfiua liveil about two miles back from Tarrytown ; in 1777, he was a Lieutenant ; and he was known, favorably, at that time, iK'cause of his capture of a Recniiting Officer from the City of New Y'ork. (Pr Benoni Piatt was a member of tbe first County Committee, appointed in Mny, 177r>. The Hon. Lewis C. Piatt, formerly Surrogate of the County, is his gnuidson. - IlLtttirii-ttl ]iIit}tuM-riptit relating to the War «/ the HevohttUm : Militiirii HttttntHf xxvii., *J.'i4. '.lanim Variaii was a member of the first County ('ummittee, chosen in May, 1775. ^.\nthui)y Miller was electeil to the coninianrtliindt ; but, inasmuch as there were several persons Itearing that name — two, at the same time, in the same Regiment, bearing exactly opposite characters — it is not, now, known which, if either, was the particular James Miller who is named in the text. kiah Grey, for its First Lieutenant;" Ephraim Ray- mond, for its Second Lieutenant ; and Gabriel Higgins, for its Ensign. The District of Poundridge elected Joseph Lock- wooointed Sectind Major of the Ueginieut ; and be was succeeded by Lieutenant Truesilale, wlu> was elected Captain, in tbe following December. He represented the County in the .Vssenibly of the Stati-, 1777-'S, 177S-;i, 17SS-'.I, and IMil ; and in the Convention which ratifieil the Cmtslilnlion jm- the t 'liileil Slulex. K/.ekiel llawley was ( 'hairnian of the Committee at .Salem, in Decem- ber, 177li (llisl,,rital MiluHarripln, etc. : M'vurlbinrmin I'ltyiers, XXXV. Ii07). > ' Hialiiru ill MaiiiiM ripln reluliiiy to the H'xi- of the Ileniliiliinl : Mililiirij lletitrm, xxvii., "245. Thomas Thomas was a son of Hon. John Tbonuis and a brother of John Thomas, Junior, who was a member of tbe Provincial Ci>ngress. He was a nieinliei' of tbe lirst County ('onunittee, app<7, 17S8, lTJi!-'3, 1S(K>-'1, 18U'2, 1803, 18l>4: lie was Sherift of (he Coiiiily, 178»-17!r2 ; he was a Senator from the .Southern District, 180.'>-'8 ; in 18(17, he was one of tbe Council of Appointment ; and be died on the twenty-ninth of May, 1824. 284 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTt. Budd, its Lieutenant-colonel ; Ebenezer Lockwood, its First IMajor; ' Thaddeus Crane, its Second Major; Jon- athan G. Tompkins, its Adjutant ; ^ and John Thomas, Junior, its Quarter-master.* The provisions of the Provincial Congress's enact- ment requiring one-fourth of the Militia of the Coun- ty to be organized as Minute-men, appear to have been very indifferently obeyed; and the following are the Officers of the only Companies which were raised in Westchester-county, as far as they are now procur- able from the records which have been preserved : The Company of Poundridge and Lower Salem — which was called, also, " the First Company of Min- " ute-men of the County " — elected, originally, Ebenezer Slason, to be its Captain ; Henry Slason, to be its First Lieutenant ; Ebenezer Scofield, to be its Second Lieutenant; and Daniel Waterberry, to be its Ensign ; but, subsequently, when Captain Slason was promoted, Henry Slason was made Captain, Ebenezer Scofield was promoted to the First Lieutenancy, Daniel Waterberry to the Second Lieutenancy, and David Purdy was made its Ensign.* 1 Ebenezer tiockwood was a .lustice of the Peace and one of tlie (jiioriini, under the t'olonial Government ; a member of the Second, Third, and Fourth Provincial Coiigressea ; and of the Convention of the Slate ol New Vorli. He was a member of the Assembly of tlie State, representing Westchester-county, 1778-'fl, 17S4-'5, 17SC, 1787, ]78»;aud he was County Judge, 1791-3 ; and one of the llegents of the llniver. sity, 178-l-'7 ; etc. He died on the twenty-ninth of July, 1821, aged eighty-four years. -Jonathan G. Tompkins was a member of the first County Committee, elected in May, 177.5; a member of the Third and Fourth Provincial Congresses, of the Committee of Safety, and of the Council of Safety. He was a member of the Assembly of the State, 178l)-'l, 1781-'2, 178U, 1787, 1788, 17'.ll, 17y2 ; of the Board of Uegcnts of the University, 1787- 18118; and of the Constitutional Convention of 1801. He was the First Judge of the County, 17"j:5-'7, 1798-1802 ; and died on the twenty-sec- ond of May, 182:). The distinguished Daniel D. Tompkins, Governor of the Sfcite, Vice President of the llnited Stiites, and one of tlie greatest men of his periwl, was a son of Jonathan G. Tompkins. ^ John Thomas, Junior, iis the reader knows, was one of thelea ; ami of that of 177(')-'7. He represented Westehester-connty in the .\ssenihly of the State, 1777- 177!)-'X(), 17W>-'81, 17«(i and 1788 ; etc. He viaa a resident of tlie Manor of (\irthindt. - Lewis (trahani was ronneoled witli the Morrises, of Morrisania, hy marriage ; and he was a member of all the Provincial Oongroasesand of the Convention of the State, 1775-'78. He waa made Judge of the (tonrt of Admiralty, in Kobrnary, 1778. ^Abraham Storm had Iwen originally elected to the command of the Tarr.vtown Company of Militia, (I'mje 282, f(ii('- ,) and he represented the Manor of Philipsborough in the County Committee of 177li-'7. He lived at Tarrytown. Klijah Miller was a resident andoneof the Snl>-committee of North- castle. 'This statement is made on the authority of a Letter frotn CI ilhrrt Dnike, Clinirnmn of the Conntij Commillei; to IIik Proviiiriul CoiujreM, "White Plains, October 24th, 177.1." The Jonrtial of the I'roviticuil CoiM^rcw, (" Die Mercurii, 10 ho., A.M., October, 177.5,") shows the re- ceipt of the letter, by that body, and the issue of the Commiaeiious to the several gentlemen named. those who were dependent on the unfortunate vic- tims." While these provisions of that enactment were ])eculiarly oppressive on that class of i)overty-stricken working-men and boys, in the Cities, then largely un- employed, who had been the ever-ready, ever- noisy, and ever-destructive auxiliaries of the revolutionary faction, in all the riotous demonstrations of the pre- ceding ten years, and while these enactments, there- fore, in those instances, appeared to be somewhat re- tributive in their character and operations, they were, also, very oppressive on many a farmer in Westchester- county, who had been more peaceful in his inclina- tions and conduct than those working-men, in the Cities, had been. Indeed, the required equipment, in specified form, of themselves, and their boys, and their hired help — their well-tried Ibwling-pieces hav- ing been unavailable for that i)iirpose — and the stated withdrawal of all of them from their farms, for drill, on frequent, specified days, no matter how necessary their presence, at home, might have been, were un- duly burdensome on all those farmers, to say nothing of the opportunity which was thereby atlbrded, very soon afterwards, for still greater acts of lawless op- pression, in the seizure of those very equipments, " As an illustration of the effect of the Rebellion on the great body of the lowly working-nten, in this particular feature, as early as in the Autumn of 177.'i, and as an eviileuce of the une:i8ines.s of tho.se work- ing-men, because of this oppres.sive enactment, the following homely Petition has been copietl from the original maniisci-ipt, in the Ilistin-U-nl Mmiuarrijtt.-i^ etc.: Petitunut^ xxxi., .52 : "New York, Sept. yM), 1775. " To THE Gentlemen of the Conqiiess in New Vokk. " We your humble Pertisuei's Ceiitlemen are now warned To bear "arms In Defence of our Country truly Tt is the Native place of .some of "us wich Now Gentlemen may it please your onnei-s To take it in (aui ■ "sideration we are Controld more by poverty than By our own will we " must Now beg of your honners To take it in Consideration wtu'e yiiu " In our State of Poverty yon wold not lay on us more than we can " Bare Sonu^ of this poor Cyty Now who you have yon ha^ e ('ommand. '•To hare Arms In Defence of (Hii-s Ijilx-rty and Kites Not our Kite but "such gentlemen as has got lands and Kstates liutsonie of us Now has ■'Skareely got Victuals from taiii Pat- rick Sinclair, ('aptain .Tidiaii Cliristiaii Drewidz, John Jlorrell, Adam Patrick, Isaiah Purdy, ('aptain Melancton Lawrence, .Joseph Allicock, Captain Charles De liay, and .lolm Caiidell. A simple reference to the several papers, in detail, would require more room than can be given to it, in this place. -The instiincesof Angus McDonald, Captain Drewidz, John Morrell, Adam Patrick, and Isaiah Pnrdy, already referred to, among others. ■'Angus McDonald was sent to General Wooster, then in command of a body of Connecticut troops ; and, by him, he was sent to Fairfield, and imprisoned, with aggravated severity, of which even his jailer com- plained. and unfounded persecution of an innocent man, to the contempt of the country and of the world.* It sat in secret judgment over those whom it bad arrested, in instances wherein it was, also, the only accuser ; ^ and it recognized the existence, in merely local self- constituted " Committees," in the several Counties, of the same authority to arrest and to imprison those who were obnoxious to them, either with or without accusers or accusations, which it claimed for itself and exercised." In short, it very promptly set aside the government of the written Law, and established, in its stead, that of the unrestrained will of an oligarchy, seated within every Town, against which there was no other security, for either persons or properties, than the personal favor of the stronger local power, no matter how obtained — all that, too, was done in the name of Freedom and the Rights of Man, by those who assumed to be honorable men, and, mo.st of all, by those who insisted that their allegiance to their Prince and their attachment to " the illustrious House "of Hanover" were ranked, by themselves, as among their most singular blessings;' by those, indeed, who, nearly at the same time, declared they were " deeply "impressed with the importance, the utility, and the "necessity of an accommodation with their Parent " State ; " aud who were, also, they said, " conscious " that the best service we can render to the present " and all future generations must consist in promoting "it."** ^ Reference is liere made to tho case of Timothy Doughty, of Duclieaa- coYinty, in which the victim, heoause ho declined to sign the General As- sortati/m — tliere was no evidence whicli tlie Congress considered refij)ectft- ble, showing any other offence — was sei/ed by Kghert Benson, whose niethodet at an Election have been noticed ; and sent to New York, without anij evidence of wrong-doing; and thrown into a jail, without any jtrovision for his Kui)port. At the request of Benson, he WHS kept in jail, fur several weeks, without knowing for wliat he had been arrested ; and that, tinly to enable his umaen and maligmtnt ac- cuser to manufacture evidence against him. Fifteen Mw77;//wt affidavits were subsequently sent to the f-ongress, and hkai>//j the rirtim^ when he wan {jiven a hearing; but their worthlessness was so evident that the Congress discharged Poughty, although, as stated, it would not permit him to have copies of the papers, nor even to rea*! them, {Junruals of thf <'oiiiniiU^-f »f Sa/Hfi, September 4th ; snnu-, Sei)tendier iiStb, 1775; Jonrnah uj the Provincial Congress, " Die .lovis, 9 ho., A.M., Oirtober " 19, 1775 ; " the same, " Die Martis, 9 lio., A.M., October 24, 1775 ; " /V titioNH of Timothy bought ij and others^ Sejitember 22, 25, October 4, 11, mfy, {UiHtoriral Mannsrripbi,eU\: PetUions, xxxi., 90,88, 70,30.) '» Among other instiinres, those of Angus McDonald, Molancton Law - rence, and Captain Drewit/,, may be referred to. *» The local autliorities arrested and confined, without any trustworthy evidence, Jolm Morrell, Adam Patrick, and Isaiah Purdy, in Orange- county ; the Berghs, Timothy Poughty, and Mordecai Lester, in Duch- ess county ; John Connor, in Tryon-county ; Abraham Lawrence, in Queens county ; etc. 7 Letter from the Provinci^il Congress to the Genthnnen Mt rrhanLs of tlte Province of (ii^chee. " In Prooincud Oongresn^ New-York, June 12th, 1775,' ^Letter fr, 1775 ; of a Letter from Mujor liei^umin Fliii/tl ami ntJicrs to Janu'x HirinijtoH^ " Ukook-ma VEN, Sl'f'- " roi.K-couNTT, Nkw-Vohk, March l!, 177.'>," {Uiriaijionn Xcw-York duzel- leer, No. 10:i, New- York, 'rinirs, 177") ;) aiid of a berttirnlum of the Iithaltitaiits of lirook-ltitre» , Sujfitlk-countlf, \ew VorA", **BrooK* " Haven, Jlarch 10, 177.'>," ((Jaiiie's .Vi ir- IV.ri llnzetle : anil the Weekli/ Mrriurii, No, 122:t, New-Y'obk, Monday, JIarch 2(1. 177,5.) 3 JoiiriKi/ <>/ (Ae Prorincuil Congresx, "Die Veneris, 9 ho. .\.M., .\ugU8t " nth, 177,5." ' Joiininl of the Prorinciiit Couijmx, " Die Sabbati, 9 lio. .V.M., .\iigU8t " 26th, 1775." " preservation justify every reasonable measure en- " tered into, to counteract or frustrate such attempts : " Therefore, " Resolv KD, That if any person or persons shall be "found guilty, before the Committee of any City "or County, of attempting, (after the date of this "Resolution,) to furnish the Ministerial Army or "Navy with Provisions or other necessaries, contrary "to the Resolutions of the Continental or of this " Congress ; ^ or of holding a correspondence, by letter "or otherwise, for the purpose of giving information " to the said Army or Navy, of the measures pursued " by the United Colonies or any of them ; " or of ad- " vising ex|)edicnts which the said Army or Navy " might or ought to pursue, against the said Colonies f*Th(! Provincial Congress not only had passod no RfHoIutioMK prohibiting the supply of '* tlie ]\IiniKteriaI .\nny and Navy with i)r(ivi8ion» or other " necessarii'K," thereby, even from the revolutionary standpoint, leaving that bnsuu'KS open lo \vlitinisoe\er might endtark in it ; imt, on the nn.)rning of the tlay <)n wliicli this enactment was made, it gave its ofTi- cial sjinction to the supply of the Asiti, man-of-war, with Uh necessary supplies, from the City of New York, and with water and beer, from Brooklyn, all ()f them by .Vbraliaiu Lett, the oflicial .\gent-victualler " for His Majesty's Ships in this Port," (Jnitninl nf the I\oriurU\l Conijrrss^ " Die Veneris, U lio., A.M., September 1st, 1775.") Four days afterwards. Doctor McLean was authorized to supply the same ship, with Drugs ami Medicines, as he had previously done, (Jmirnnl nf the C'onniiilter of Siifet;/^ "Die Martis, '.I ho., .V.M., Septendier .jth, 1775.") On the twenty-ninth ^)f .lanuary, 177li, William .Mien had permission to go on board the .IsiVi, to measure the men for shoes, and to make and deliver a hundreil liaii"s, if so many should bo needed. {Jonnitil of the Committee of Sofefif, "Die Luna', 10 ho., .\.M., January 29tli, 177(5. ') On the sixteenth of February, 17715, Henry White was permitted to supply the Asui and the PhieiiLr with fresh provisions and vegetables. {Jotmiol of the l\oviiiciiil CoiKjrexx, ' Die Veneris, 10 ho., A.M., February Kith, 177G.") While the Provincial Congress was thus inonopoli/.ing the supplying of the men-of-war, it "was filled with the utmost anxiety ' when, during the Autumn of 1775, " small boats from (Queens and Westchester-coun- "ties" undertook to enter into the same business ; and "to [irevent .so "greata mischief," a small armed vessel was purclnisod, " to watch those "and other dangerous supplies of the like kind," — {The Committee of Sofiiii to the Xeir- Ylished, {Letter from Henry Itemnen, Cliaintotu of the Cmnmittee of the Cil;!, to the Committee of t^ifetji, and the reply of the latter, both undated : Journal of tlie Committee of tyifeli/: " Die Mercurii, 10 ho., .\.M., Feh'y 7th, 1770.") There does not seem to have been any hesitation in supplying the pro- visions, on the part of any one, either in New York, or in WeslchestiT- county, or in (iueens-county — why should there have been ? Thi' only ([Uestion appears to have been, />;/ irhom ami for n'hone pecuniary benefit they shoidd lie thus supplied. There were those, in the Provim-ial Con- gress, who were always ready to enjoy an advantage, in trade or elsts- where : there was a conunereial advantage, in victualing the ships, which those "(mtriots" preferreil to retain. Ilail the boatmen of West- chester and (Jueens counties, while bringing their surplus products to market, been wise enough to have consigneil their cargoes to some of those enterprising " Merchants," .\le.\ander McDougal and his armed vessi)i " before (ipneral Howe; (ieiionil Saniuol IL Piirsons Imil not yet coinmenceJ the siipplv of information, ctnicerning projected military movements, etc., thnmgh Squire ■•Heron," to Sir Henry Clinton ; Israel Putnam had not yet led Robert R. Livinj^ton to "question" "his very fidelity ;" and Benedict Arnold, maddened by wrongs imposed on him, had not yet connnenced his cor- respondence with .lolin .\ndr6. ^Compare this particular penalty with the particular requirement, "they shall be committed to close confinement, at " their respective expense.'' And, in case any of the " said Committees are unable to carry this or any " Resolution into execution, they are hereby directed " to ap[)ly to the next County Committee or command- "ing Officer of the Militia, or to the Congress or the " Committee of Safety of this Colony, for necessary "assistance, as the case may require.* But if it " shall so happen that any violators of this Resolu- " tion shall reside in a County where there is no " Committee of the County, in that case, the matter " shall be triable before the Committee of the next "County: Provided that no person shall be tried " before the General Committee of the City and " County of New York, upon the Resolutions herein "contained, unless the stated quorum be present; "and in the City and County of Albany, unless " there are present twenty-five members. " Resolved farther, That the respective Com- " mittees and the Militia of the several Counties, by " order of the respective Committees or of the Com- " missioned Officer of the Militia then nearest, are " hereby expressly enjoined to apprehend every " Iidiabitaut or Resident of this Colony, who now is " or who shall hereafter be discovered to be enlisted " or in arms against the Liberties of America, and to " confine such oti'ender or offenders, in safe custody ; "and his or their i)unishment is reserved to the " determination of this or some future Provincial "Congress. And the Committee nearest to any per- " son who shall be so enlisted or liave taken up "arms against the Liberties of America are herebj' "directed to appoint some discreet person to take "the charge of the Instate, both real and personal, of " any such i)erson or persons; which person so ap- " pointed shall be invested with such Estate, and "render, on oath, a just and true account thereof, to "this or some future Congress or to Commissioners " by them to be ai)|)ointed, and to pay the issues and " ])rofits thereof to the Treasurer appointed by this " Congress, for the use of the associated Colonies. " Resolved, That if any person be taken up on "suspicion of any of the Crimes in the above Reso- "lutions specified, he shall immediately be taken " before the Committee of the City, Town, Manor, contained in the enactment concerning the Slilitia, ailojrted eleven days previously, 10*2 fo(/<-,) that ererif Jtihahilnut^ between sixteen and fifty years of age, should fnlly equip himself with arms and largely supply himself w itii ammunition, heavy penalties being imposed, iu case of de- fault, in either respect. ^That particular feature of this enactment was intended to imiioverish the victim, if he possesseil property , or to leave him to be starved, if he had none ; and the barbarism of the jirovision anse<|uently, in the physical sufferings of .John O'Connor and Daviil I'nrdy ; and in those of the Berghs, the Dohbses, and Timothy Doughty, (//i«/«)i<t long after this enactment was made, the Committee of West- chester-county, as will be seen, hereafter, called for and received the armed assistance of men of Connecticut, to enforce ol.>edience to its Reso- lutions or submission to some of its arbitrary seizures of the properties of some of their law-abiding neighbors. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 289 " Precinct, or District where the offender shall have " been taken up ; and if, upon examination, the sus- " picion shall appear to the said Committee to be "groundless, that he be discharged: Provided, "also, that no person charged to be an offender " shall be tried upon any of the foregoing Resolves, " until the persons to be Judges of the offence be " first severally sworn to try and adjudge the person " so charged, without partiality, favour, or affection, " or hope of reward, according to evidence ; and that " every witness who shall be examined on such trial "shall have the. charge distinctly and clearly stated "to him ; and be thereupon sworn to speak the truth, " the whole truth, and nothing but the truth." ' ******* It will be seen that, by this remarkable enactment, every person in the Colony was placed at the mercy of the local Committee of the County in which he lived ; that no one was permitted to disregard or to treat with disrespect either the " recommendations " or the " Resolutions " of Congresses or Committees, of either high or low degree, no matter with what disclaimers of obligation those "recommendations" and "Resolutions" might have been accompanied,^ nor to dissent from whatever outrages on persons or properties there might be inflicted on quiet, law- abiding persons, by even the most insignificant "District Committee" in the Colony, nor even to question the authority to do whatever it should incline to do, no matter how monstrous its actions should be, in any such Congress or Committee; that sequestra- tion, if not confiscation and absolute sale,^ of proper- ties, real and persiuial, and close confinement in bar- racks or jails, and banishment from home and family, no matter at what cost to him or to those who were dependent on him, were penalties to which every one was subject, whenever a County Committee saw fit to indict them ; that, by making the offences and the penalties matters of general interest to " the associa- " ted Colonies " — for doing which no one can pretend that a local Provincial Congress, even during a Re- bellion, could consistently assume to legislate — this enactment afforded a warrant for inroads from other Colonics, whenever the latter were inclined to make them, for the direct adjustment of matters in which 1 Journal of Ihe Provincial Congrat, " 4 ho., P.M., September 1st, "1775." - Compare the disclaimers which accompanied the Astociatioiu which were sent out, for signatures, (joayet 270, 271, aiUe;) with tlie penalties which weresubsoqucntly iinposeU on those who had decUued to sign those Aisocialioiui, in the orders issued for their disarumment, (jiaije 288, age« of the records of the doings of the revolutionary faction so pe- culiarly abound. 3 We are sensible that the letter of this enactment affonls a warrant for nothing else than a sequestration of tlie properties of tliose who were proscribed ; but the spirit of it was seen in the action of those Commit- tees who wi-re, by this enactment, made niiistei^ of the great Inxly of the Colonists, when those t'onimittee.s, as will be seen, hereafter, not only sequestrated, but contiscatcd and sold, the properties of those who were personally obnoxious to them. •21 they possessed a conceded interest; that no appeal from the judgment of such a local revolutionary tribunal, too often controlled by personal or family quarrels* or by ecclesiastical or neighborhood feuds or by foreign interferences, was provided for or allowed ; and that the dictates of his conscience and the oath of his office, if he held an office, as far as these sh(,uld assert his duty to his Sovereign and to the Colonial and Home Governments, must be sternly disregarded and suppressed, by every one. History has failed to record, in the annals of any other community, another such instance of solemn mockery and of refined hypocrisy and of relentless personal and partisan bitterness as is seen in this enactment, framed and ordained and promulgated by men who pretended to so much of honor and intelli- gence, to so much of loyalty to the King and of re- gard for the Constitution, to so much of veneration for the Rights of Man and of reverence for the supreme Laws of God, as were claimed, for themselves, by the Livingstons and the Morrises, the Van Cort- landts and the Clintons, and their several supporters, in the Provincial Congress of Colonial New York ; and the annals of partisan malignity, ecclesiastical or civil, afford few instances wherein an ecclesiastical or civil enactment, no matter by what authority nor under what circumstances it may have been ordained Hnd promulgated, has been more relentlessly enforced, in its penalties, than this enactment of a revolution- ary Congress was enforced, in the Colony and State of New York. Scarcely a homestead existed in Colonial Westchester-county, in which the unbridled despotism of a self-constituted Precinct or District or Town Committee did not display its ill-gotten, ill-regulated power, under the sanction of this enactment, protected and supported, whenever protection and support were needed to ensure entire success, by the local and the Continental military power or by hungry ruffians from over the border;* and there are enough of * "The information you have received, in respect to Captain Cuthbert, "is, I believe, in part true, but hiis originated from a private pique, and "is much exaggerated. You will observe I have bought his wheat from "him, which he readily sold me, at the Sitnie time complained, most " bitterly, of being threatened with the lo.ss of his life, by the sanu- Don "you mentioned, who. I believe, is a very bad man. Many persons in " the Cuuutry are seeking for private revenge under pretence of concern "for the publick safety." — General (Benedict Arnold to Samuel Chase, "SoREL, May 15, 177G.") General Arnold's remarks were perfectly applicable to every portion of the Colony. Who, among historical students, does not know that one of the most virulent of those who persecuted the loyal and law abiding Colonists, in Colonial New York — a very thinly disguised monarchist who was thus figuring as a most zealous republican — had been largely prompted to play a part in the politics of the perio- pose and {H-rsecute the friends and family of the two young Imlies, sisters, who had successively preferred more graceful and more companionable, if not as mentally and scholastically deserving, suitors for their hands and fortunes ? ^Tbis sentence has bi^cn v\Titten with a perfect understanding »f what is stjkteil in the text, com-eniing tliost! who p;u>sed from Connecticut into Westchester-county, to a^ist the local Committees, in that (Aiiinty, in their work of outrage and robbery. Greenwich, iStamford, Kidge field, Danbury, Wilton, New (^amuin, and the other border Towns 290 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. merely incideDtal allusions, left among the well-con- cealed records of those times, to say nothing of those more startling evidences which went, unrecorded, into the graves of those who had been thus plundered and outraged, when the latter were carried to their last earthly homes, to show that the Drakes and the Thomases, the Odells and the Martlings, the Lock- woods and the Dutchers, and those who were associated with them, "patriotically "supporting what was called " the glorious cause of Liberty," were experts in ruth- less barbarism, and entirely worthy of thecrowns of in- famy which history has awarded to more distinguished, but not more accomplished, inquisitors and despots. The publication of this barbarous enactment was followed, immediately, by active preparations for persecution, by those, in Westchester-county, who were engaged in promoting the cause of the Rebel- lion ; and they promptly reported to the Provincial Congress, for what purpose is very evident, the fol- lowing list of those, in that County, who were espe- cially obnoxious to them " Col. Phillips,^ " Joseph Harris, "James Harris, "Major Brown's two sons " Isaac and Josiah that "lives at home,' " Lyon Miller,* Bartholomew Hains,* Mr. Duncan and Brown at Marroneck, Capt. Joshua Purdy,* Jeremiah Travess, Solomon Fowler,' Joshua Purdy,* in Connecticut, as ifl well known, were too nearly akin in scntiuient to the Towns in Westchester-county to have supplied rcftj^'cUihl^ men, for 6uch a questionable service ; and specimens of those of Connecticut who were so zealous in tlie support of the Rebellion, in New York, when there was no armed forces before them— those, from that Colony were not 80 zealous, on the northern frontier and in Canada, at Kips Bay and in Neiv Jereey, when an armed enemy was either before or behind them — might have been seen in those who were led by Waterbury and by Sears, by Wooster and by Webb, of whom and of whose peculiarly " New Eng- "land Ideas," concerning the laws of mcuw et (num, history has left abundant evidence. 1 Historical 3lannscripts^ etc. ; Mitccllaneous Papers, xxxiv., 193. - Colonel Frederic Philipse, of Youkers and Sleepy llollow, Member of the General Assembly, already made known to the reader. He was exiled ; and his property sequestrated, confiscated, and sold. ^ Isaac and Josiah Brown were arrested ; thrown into the Prison at the White Plains ; and subsequently released on condition that they should board with William Miller, Deputy Chairman of the County Committee, at their own expense, instead of at their own homes, ' Lyon Miller was First Lieutenant in the Harrison Precinct Company of Militia, reorganized under the enactment of the Provincial Congress, in .\ugust, 1775. 5 Bartholomew Haines was arrested and thrown into Prison at the AVhite Plains. His name will be seen, very frequently, in the following pages of this narrative. 6 Captain Joshua Purdy was, probably, the person of that name who has been referred to, elsewhere, in these notes, in connection with another person, bearing the same name but without a title, who was, also, named on this list of the proscribed of Westchester-county. Although the rec- ords do not mention the distinguishing title, if he had one, of the victim whose arrest and imprisonment and conditional release are mentioned in the note referred to, and, therefore, the untitled "Joshua Purdy'' has been connected with those records, there are circumstances which favor the impression that Captain Joshua was the person to whom they really referred. ' Solomon Fowler was reported to the Provincial Congress, a second time, in June, 1776, and summoned to appear before the *' Committee " on Conspiracies," soon after. *^ Joshua Purdy, either this person of that name or Captain Joshua who ' Elijah Purdy, 'Gilbert Horton,'' 'Edmond Ward,'" 'Caleb Morgain," 'James Hortan, Esq.'^ 'William Barker, Esq.'' 'Person Seabury," ' Godfrey Haines, added "on Saturday evening, 'Jeremiah Travess, Junr., "Joshua Jonathan Pardie, White Plains,'^ Saml. Merrit, Manor of Courtiandt," Mr. Peter Hatfield, Isaac Hatfield, Edward Palmer,'* Nath. Whitney, Esq. Pater Drake," Peter Corney,^" Carne." There need be no surprise that that remarkable en- actment and the activity in enforcing its provisions which was seen among those who favored the Rebel- lion and among those who desired the advantages which a general breaking down of those who opposed that Rebellion would probably ensure to them, in the expected and intended sequestrations and confisca- tions and sales of properties, real and personal, throughout the County, aroused the attention and the indignation of the great body of the conservative is also named on this list, was reported to the FroTincial Congress, a second time ; summoned before the "Committee on Conspiracies;" im- prisoned at the White Plains ; and released from prison on condition that he should board with William Miller, Deputy Chairman of the County Committee, at his own expense, instead of at his own home. "Gilbert Horton was arrested and thrown into the Prison at tlie White Plains. '"Edmund Ward was arrested and thrown into the Prison at the White Plains. " Caleb Morgan w;is reported to the Provincial Congress, a second time : arrested ; and thrown into the Prison at the White Plains. 12 James Horton, Esq., was summoned before the " Committee of "Safety," as the County Committee called itself, in August, 1777; was unusually independent in his answers to that body ; and appears to have remained without further trouble. 13 William Barker, Es,") confirmed his former statement, that the information came " from the City of Philadelphia." Having failed to secure that guaranty of protection from the Corporation of the City of New Y'ork which the circumstances led him to ask for, he went on board the Halifax:, on the eighteenth or nineteenth of October, {Governor Tryon to Mayor Hicks, ' ON board rnE H.M-ifax Packet, 19"'> "October, 1775.") As the Delegates from New York, in Philadelphia, were well-informed, not only concerning the Kesolution but concerning the secret corre- spondence of the Continental Congress, which evidently formed a portion of the information which was comnuinicated to the Governor, there is reason for believing that the correspondent of the Governor was a mem- ber of that Delegation ; and the reader need not be told, in view of the fact that Lieutenant-governor Colden exposed the names of his corre- spondents, one of whom was in the Delegation of 1775, which was the particular Delegate who was undoubtedly the correspondent, also, of Governor Tryun, especially since, as was well known, the Governor's the Halifax, packet, and, subsequently, on board ilie Duche 8 of Gordon, the latter lying under the pro- tecting guns of the ^^Isia. The prisoners in the Jail, victims of arbitrary power, were less fortunate, in their intercourse with those exercising authority, among the revolutionary faction. There is no record of the discharge of Godfrey Haines from the Jail, in the City of New York ; but, on the contrary, when the record of the proceedings of the Committee of Safety, on the morning of the twenty-ninth of Sej^teinber, when he was taken before that body by Daniel Winter and the guard who had brought him from the White Plains,* was laid before the Provincial Congress, after the latter body had re- assembled, after its rece-s, those proceedings were officially approved ; ^ and, subsequently, the further proceedings of the Committee of Safety, on the morn- ing of the thirtieth of September, when Godfrey was committed to the Jail, in New York," were also offi- cially approved by the same Provincial Congress.' He was not officially released ; but, very soon after his Petition had been filed, without receiving any other attention, his necessities nerved his arms f and, about midnight, he broke six grates out of the win- dow of his prison, and released himself. Hastening to the wharf, on the East River, the starved fugitive, from whom all food and drink had been withheld for more than a week," he " impressed," if he did not steal, a boat ; and found refuge and food on board of official and personal leanings were toward the Livingstons rather than toward the rivals of the latter, the De Lancoys, who had previously oc- cupied the nearest place to the throne, in the Colony ; and, especially, since the Delegate referred to was, by marriage, a member of the Liv- ingston family. The Memorandum which the Governor Is said to have subsequently stated " was the gruuud nf niy subsequent conduct in removing on Board "the Packet," {Governor Tryon to the Earl of Dartmouth, " Os uoard the " Dutchess of Gordo.n New York 11 th Nov 177-5,") bears, on its face, the date when he is said to have received it — " Mem. Rec' from N York : "the best authority Nov 2 1775 W T." — and it may have been sent to him by Egbert Duniont, as stated b}' Judge Jones and his commentator ; but, when it was siiid to have been received, the Governor had surely been on the Halifax or on the Ductless of Gordon, more than a fortnight. The name of the real author of that Memorandum, on which Governor Tryon is inconsistently said to have placed so much dependence, and the purpose for which it was transmitted to him. after he had been roamed of his danger and had seatred his safety, are questions which need not be discussed, in this place. ■•See page 203, ante. ^ Jouniul of the Provincial Comjress, " Die .Jovis, 10 ho., A.M., October "26th, 177.5." ••See page 293, ante. •Journal vf the Provincial Congress, " Die Veneris, 10 ho., A.M., Oc- "tober, 27, 1775." 8 "David Rhea says that Captain Haines told him he was put in jail "because he refused to deliver up his arms ; and that his punishment "had been determined, that he should not eat nor drink until he had "delivered them up." — [Testimony of David Phea, before the CommiUee of Safety -Journal of the Committee, "Die Sabbati, 10 ho., A.M., January " 20th, 177C.") " Haines was tried and sentenced, at the White Plains, on the twenty- eighth or twenty-ninth of September, when his sentence of starvation probably coii,menced to run. Six, if not seven, days afterwards, he petitioned for food, saying "he had not whereHithal to suport himself," his jailers, in the City of New Y'ork, doing nothing more than to read his Petition, and to place it on their files, {page 293, anle.) It is not probable that his long fast was continued longer thau the succeeding midnight. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 295 the Asia, man-of-war, then lying in the stream.' Captain Vandeput of that ship, treated him icindly ; 'gave him an order for some oars ; and evidently found a way to restore him to his home, in Rye. He was there, during the same month, engaged in " getting " out a parcel of oars for the man-of-war," in New- York,^ declaring, at the same time, that he " was " determined to have satisfaction on some particular "persons," evidently in retaliation for the wrongs which those persons had inflicted on him.^ Tlie subsequent career of that unfortunate victim of Westchester-county's " patriotism " would afford material for a romance, as it has done that for dis- passionate historj'. During the succeeding Decem- ber [1775], in company with " one Palmer " — said to have been of Mamaroneck — he loaded the Sloop Polii/ and xIh/j, which he had recently purchased from Isaac Gedney, with Beef, Pork, and other Provisions ; and, taking on board three quarter-casks of Madeira Wine, a package of Turnip.«, and other articles, all of them for General Howe, and other packages for General Ruggles, Mr. Willard, and Mrs. Ann Wood, together with Isaac Gedney, Bartholomew Haines (who was his cousin) Mr. Palmer (who was one of the owners of the cargo), and seven other persons, pas- sengers, he sailed for Boston. He sailed from New York, on a Wednesday, the nineteenth of December, nominally for the West Indies, but undoubtedly for Boston. It appears, however, that adversity still ac- companied him ; and, on the following Saturday night, [^December 23, 1775], the PoUy and Ann was driven ashore, at Squam Beach, on the coast of New Jersey, so widely known as the " graveyard" of the mercantile marine of the world. The savory reputation of the " wreckers " of that treacherous cosist, sometimes made more treacherous by reiison of the false lights displayed by those who lived there, will prepare the reader for the remainder of that sad story of adventure and of disaster — the vessel does not appear to have gone to pieces ; and that and what remained of her cargo, after the "wreckers" had satisfied themselves from it, were seized by the local revolutionary Committee of Monmouth-county, and sold, not for the benefit of the owners of either the vessel or the cargo, but for what- ever other purpose the Provincial Congress of New Jersey should determine; while " the Captain, Mas- " ter, and Passengers," or such of them as had not already abandoned the scene of their last affliction, after nineteen days had elapsed since the wreck of I Haines made this statement to one of the guard which subsequently conveyed bin to New- York, after lie had been re captured, {Tettimmiy of Major Hfitderson^ before the CommUtee of SftfcOf ;) and he also made the same statement to David Rhea, [Testimony of David Rhea^ before the tame Commillee: Journal of the Committee of Safeli/, ''Die Sabbati, lU bo., "A.M., January 20. 1776.") ^ Examination of Gilbert Budd before the Provincial Congress — Journal of the Provincial Congreu, "Die Veneris, 5 ho., P.M., November 3, " 177.1." ^A_fi Journal of the Committee of Safety, "Die Martis, .1 ho., P.M., 2^rmmitlee of Ulster-county "In Committee of Safety, New-Youk, 23rd Jaiiy, 177G." ^ Letter from the UUter county VommiUee to the Committee of Safety^, "KiNfiSTON, January 'iVth, 1776." ^ Willitwi Elsworthj Chairvtan of the Vhter-couiity Comviittee^ to the Provincial Congress, "Kingston, May 22, 1776;" Journal of the Prooin Cial Congress, "Die Sabbati, 9 ho., A.M., May 25, 1776." * Isaac Gidriey, probably the same person, visited Governor Tryon, on the Duchess of Gordon, a few months afterwards, (Eramination of Wil- liam Sutton before the Westchester-county Committee, July 2-3, 177C.) 5 William Nelson was one of those who, in the following year, "were "supposed to have gone to the British Army," (List of Sundry Persons, Inhabitants of Corthindt's Manor, etc. : Historical Manuscripts, etc. ; Mis. cellaneous Papers, xxxvi., 594). s Joshua Ferris, a son of Caleb Ferris, was cue of those who went on board the Phunijr, when that ship went up the Hudson, in July, 1776, {Examination of Joshtta Ferris : Historical Manuscripts, etc. : MisceltaneoUg Papers, XXXV., 69, 85.) He, or another pcnson bearing the same name, wasapiisoner, intlieJail at the White Plains, in September, 177i;,at which time he petitioned the Provincial Congress "that His Irons may be "taken off as he caunott posibly Shift Himself or get clear of the Ver- "uiin, with which he is Greatly Infected to the great disturbance of his "unfortunate fellow prisoners," (Hisloricid Manuscripts, etc. : Petitions, xxxiii., 82.) ' Bartholomew Haines, a cousin of Godfrey Haines, was one of those who were reported to the Provincial Congress, as obnoxious to the revo- lutionary faction iu Westchester-county, {page 29U, ante;) and he was, also, one of those who were arrested and thrown into the Jail, at the White Plains, in the Summer of 111 {Uistorical 3Iiiuuscripts, etc. : Petitions, xxxiii., 108.) 8 Letter from the Sub-committee of the Committee of Westchester-county to the Prorincial Congress, ' White Plains, November 1, 1775." Among those who were, also, arrested and thrown into prison, by the Committee of Westchester-county, under the provisions of the enactment of the Pro- vincial Congress which is now under consideration, were Joshua Purdy, Caleb Morgan, John McCord, Gilbert Horton, Josiah Brown, Edmund Ward, Samuel Merrit, Philip Fowler, Gabriel Purdy, Wil- liam Barker, Junior, John Besley, Isaac Brown, Bar- tholomew Haines, Joseph Purdy, and Jonathan Purdy; and, as an evidence of the wide-spread ruin which was inflicted on the inhabitants of the County, by the sequestrations of the real and personal estates of those who were " suspected " of being op- posed to the Rebellion, there were sequestrated in the single Town of Salem, prior to the sixth of December, 1776, the properties of Ephraim Sanford, Thomas Smith, Benjamin Close, Gilbert Hum, Samuel Bax- ter, Abraham Close, Job Keeler, Jonathan Wallace, Ezra Morehouse, Jacob Wallace, Samuel Wallace, Nathaniel Palmer, Nathan Osborn, Abraham Dan, Edward Jones, and George Butson.* It was a reasonable consequence, under the exist- ing circumstances, that questions should be raised, concerning the legitimacy of any such authority as the Provincial Congress had created, in these enact- ments, and delegated to the several local Committees, none of which were recognized by the Law of the land and all of which were antagonistic to those Laws. It was a short-sighted policy, also, even among those who were in rebellion, which inflicted penalties, especially such penalties as these, on those persons who continued, peacefullj', on their respec- tive farms, quietly pursuing their daily labors, hon- estly respecting the Laws of the country, and con- sistently recognizing and honoring the Sovereignty of the King, whom even those who were in rebellion quite as fully recognized, as their undoubted Sove- reign ; and these, for no other reason than for disre- spectful words, concerning the several Committees and Congresses, and for the utterance of questions concerning their respective authorities. It was a reasonable consequence, under existing circumstances, we repeat, that quiet men should become excited and excitable men angry, and that all .should become alarmed and indignant, when a mere handful of their neighbors, without their " consent" and without the slightest warrant of Law and without the slightest necessity, usurped and maintained such unheard-of authority as was created in these enactments; and it was equally reasonable, under the circumstances which then existed, that there should be neighborly consultations and neighborhood organizations, as well as personal efforts, for the support and protection of * The names of those who were arrested and imprisoned, which are named in the text, were copied from a single Petition for relief, {Historical Manuscripts, etc. : Petitions, x.xxiii.. 108) ; but there were many others. The names of^those farmere, in Salem, whose Farms, Stock, Tools, Crops, Household Furniture, etc., were thus seized and sold, were taken from the same Historical Manuscripts, etc. : Miscellaneous Papers, xx.w. 3117, in which the properties are mentioned, in detail. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. the personal and domestic and political Rights whiih tiiose tanners indisputably possessed, under the Constitution and the Laws of the Kinfiduui— they would have been unworthy of their manhood and of their families, of their homes and of their Rights, had they failed to become excited and alarmeii, to have armed and organized and fought, for themselves and their wives and their little ones, for their homes and tlu'ir proi>erties and their Rights, whenever anil by whomsoever and under whatever pretence of ill- gotten authority, these might have been assailed. It was a mistake, iis well iis a crime, therefore, to as- sume authority for the arrest and imjjrisoninent of men and for the sequestration of their properties and the im]iovi'rishniont of the aged and of the dependent and heljtless, without a shadow of legal authority ami in audacious defiance of it ; without a shadow of ex- isting necessity, even from the standpoint of the Re- bellion, for the enactment of such extreme measures; and with u reasonable assurance that a manly self- respect among those who were proscribed, would be surely aroused, not only for their own and their fam- ilies' protection, but, as far as they could do it, for the suppression of that haughty lawlessness which had presumed to create and to enforce so grave an enactment of despotism. It was loudly declared to have been the most ardent wish of even the most advanced advocate of rebellion, to have secured a reconciliation with the ilother Country and a restor- ation of harmony and good-will among the adverse parties throughout the several Colonies : ' how much more of wisdom there would have been displayed among those who had seized the reins of government, therefore, had they practised their hands in the work of reconciliation and harmony and goodwill among their neighbors, instead of driving the staid and the quiet and the conscientious and the law-abiding, among the latter, into active and bitter ])artisauship, and of spreading alarm and strife and misery and ruin over the entire County. There might have been fewer transformations of moral and intellectual pig- mies into potent political giants — there might have been a smaller number of fortunes rapidly and largely increased from the plunder of neighboring better- provided-for households and farmyards — but there would have been, also, fewer outrages against the I^aws of both man and of God; less occasion for bit- terness among the descendants of those who were, then, neighbors in locality, if not in fact ; and very much less for the faithful historian to condemn and to denounce, while reciting the annals of the Ameri- can Revolution, as that Revolution was developed 1 "The thought that we might be driren to the sad neceaiity ot break- " ing our coniwtiiiii with Great Britain, exclusive of tin- carnage anri " destruction, which it was ea-sy to see luust attend llie separation, always " gave n>e a gri'at deal ot grief. And even no%v, I would cheerfully re- " tire fnim pulilic life, forever, renounce all chance for honors or "profits from the public, nay, I would cheerfully contribute niy little "property, to ol>t.") 22 and seen in the agricultural and prosperous and peaceful County of Westchester, in New York. But the end of such outrages had not yet come. While the excitement occasioned by the enact- ments of the Provincial Congress, authorizing local Committees to seize and imprison ami disarm and deprive of their estates those who should become obnoxious to those local demagogues and against whom, by fair means or l)y foul, an accusation of nn- frieiully thoughts or words against the Rebellion could possibly be trumped up, was at its height, and while some of the inhabitants of the County were already suffering from imjjrisonment, attended by the most distressing circumstances, under the provis- ions of those enactments, the Committee of Safety, whom the Provincial I'ongress had left on duty, with a limited authority, during a brief recess of the lat- ter body, still further aroused the excitement and the indignation of the greater number of the Colonists in New York, of nearly all of those within Wcstches- ter-county, by the publication of the following Reso- lution and Orders : " i.\ com.mittee of s.\1-kty, " For the Colony of New York, "September 16th, 1775. '" Whereas, a great number of the men enlisted in " the Continental Service, in this Colony, arc desti- " tutc of Arms, and in order to carry into execution "the Resolutions of the Continental Congress, it is " absolutely necessary to have those troops armed : "And WHEREAS, every method to hire or purchase "Anns, hitherto attempted, has failed to jjrocure a " sutficient number of Arms for the said troops, and "the only method remaining is to impress Arms for " their use, " Resolved, therefore. That all such Arms as are " fit for the use of the troops raised in this Colony, " which shall be found in the hands or custody of any " person who has not signed the (icnernl Ax.sociafion " in this Colony, shall be impressed for the use of the " said troops. And "Ordered, That the person or persons who shall " have the charge of the carrying this Resolution into " execution, in each County, shall direct all the Arms "that shall be so impressed, to be collected at some " place in the County where they are impressed, and " there valued and a|)praised by three indifferent men " of reputation of the County, any two of whom " agreeing, shall be sufficient to ascertain the price ; "that an account be kept from whom every Musket, "Gun, or Firelock, so impressed, shall have been "taken; and each such Gun, 3Iu.sket, or Firelock "caused to be marked with the initial letter of the " name of the County where it is impressed and num- " bered, the numbers following each other, succes- "sively ; and that the same be entered in a book pro- " vided for that purpose, with the name of the owner "op|)osite to the number marked on each Musket, "Gun, or Firelock, respectively. And 298 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " Orhered, That a Certificate, specifying the value "and the mark of the Musket, Gun, or Firelock so " impressed, appraised, and marked, shall be signed " by the Aj)praisers and Impressers, which shall enti- " tie the owner thereof to receive the appraised value " from the Treasurer of tlie Provincial Congress oi " this Colony : Provided the same be not returned at " or before the conclusion of the present unhappy " controversy between Great Britain and the united '■ Colonies. And tiiat an account, signed by the said " Appraisers and Impressers, of all such Muskets, " Guns, and Firelocks, so impressed, shall be sent, " Ibrthwith, to the Secretaries of the Provincial Con- " gress, or either of them, to be filed. And that all " the Muskets, Guns, and Firelocks so impressed, on " Nassau Island,' be delivered, without delay, to Peter " T. Curtenius, the Commissary of the Provincial " Congress of this Colony; and those that shall be im- " pressed in the other Counties of this Colony, to be " deposited mth their respective Committees, subject " to the order of the said Provincial Congress or Com- " mittee of Safety. And "Ordered, That the Cajjtairis of the respective "Companies of the Third Regiment of the troops of "this Colony, who are now in Sutlbik-county, be " authorized to carry these Resolutions into execu- " tion in Queens-county. That Colonel Lasher- l)c "requested to send two or more Companies of his " Battalion, to give such assistance in (Jueens-county " as may be necessary, at such tiTue and to such place " or places as Colonel IMcDougal and .John Slo.ss Ho- " bart, Esq., shall direct or advise. And "Ordered farther, That the Chairman of the " Committee and Captain Dutcher,'' with such drafts " from the Militia as he siiall think necessary, or with " the assistance of some of General Wooster's troops,* "be enabled to carry the said Resolutions into effect, " in Westchester-county. And that these Resolutions "be carried into execution, in every other County, by "the Chairman of the County Committee, with the "assistance of the Militia Ofticers, who are hereby "ordered to be aiding therein with such jtarts of the " Militia as each such Chairman shall think necessary. "And " Ordered, That the several i)ersons who shall be " disarmed by virtue of the above Resolutions, shall " be exempted from doing duty in the Militia, as or- "dered by the Provincial Congress of this Colony. " And farther " Ordered, That in case any of the non-associators " aforesaid shall resist those persons authorized to > I/ong Island was continued to lie called "Nassan Island, ' long after 1775. -.Tohn l.aslier was Colonel of First Regiment of New York City (uni- formed) Militia. William Diitcher, of what is now Irvington, vvas Cajitain of " the " Associated C'onirany of the upper part of rhilipseliurgh, " {vidr poge2S2 anlf.) * General AVooster was encamped near Harlem, on Manhattan Island, » ith a large hody of troops, brought thither from Connecticut. " put these Resolutions into execution, they (the per- " sons hereby authorized to put in execution the "above Resolves) are hereby authorized to repel " force by force, and to take into custody such jier- " sou or persons so resisting, and cause him or them ■' to be brought before this Committee or the Provin- " cial Congress of this Colony." ^ The real purpose of the Committee of Safety, in the adoption and publication of this Resolution and of these several Orders, was the entire disarmament of every one who, for any reason, had neglected or de- clined to sign the General As-soridfion ; and, lor that reason, every class of fire-arms, whether adapted to the uses of the Army or not, was included, in every instance, in the Orders wherein the Arms to be seized were specifically described. It will be seen, also, that the Counties of Queens and Westchester were especially noticed ; and that they, alone, were selected for details of foreign troops, lor the enforce- ment, within each of them, respectively, of the ut- most rc()uirements of the Committee's Orders — be- sides the local IVIilitia, in each of the two Counties, thus honored by the Committee of Safety's malignant animosity, a large additional force of troojis, from beyond the boundaries of the County, in each instance, was placed at the disposal of those who were sent, within those Counties, respectively, for the " impressment" of the Arms, in order to ensure the most comj)letc success of the enterprise. It must have been peculiarly galling, among those who had been accustomed to hear of the " Rights of " Man " and of the " Constitutional Rights of English- "men " and all the other catchwords and maxims in the science of government — generally true, in theory, although, i>ractically, they had been seized and cm- ployed bj' demagogues, in those instances, only for the advancement of personal and partisan ends — when a military force, no matter by whom commanded nor of what troops it was composed, was moved from farm- house to farmhouse, failing to call only on those who were in favor with the Chairman of a County Com- mittee, for the seizure of whatever " Muskets, Guns, " and Firelocks " the occupants of those several farmhouses owned or had in their possession. Not an exception was made, no matter what reason there might have been for such an exception ; and every- thing which had a gun-lock on it, whether useful or useless for military purposes — whether a young man's fowling-piece, with which he was wont to have a few hours' sport, when sriuirrels and robins abounded, or to have more serious work, when foxes and more formidable marauders poached in the poultry-yards or in the sheep-i>astures ; or an old man's worn-out musket, a trusty friend in earlier AVars and, now, onlj' a remembrancer of other days and other hard- ships — everything was doomed, by that uew-formed ^ Journal nf the VomtiiUlet oj SiJ'eli/, "Die .Sibbati, '.> ho., .\.JI., Septem- " her 16th, 1775." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. power, to seizure and, practically, to tbrleiture. There was grave reason for increased discontent and excite- ment. There was ample reason, under the circum- stances which then existed, for obstructing the execu- tion of tlic t^ommittee's Orders — indeed, there was greater reason for concealing the objects whicli the military force was expected to seize and "impress," under the provisions of these Orders, than there had been for tlie concealment of the Bay Colony's military stores, at Concord, when Ijieutenant-colonel Smith and Major Pitcaini were sent to seize them, and for resisting the aggression of the {committee, tliaii there had been for the punishment of the invader, in that instance, after his work had been finished, on tlie highway, between Concord and Charlestown.' It is said that, in (Queens-county, " the people "conceal all their Arms that are of any value; many "declare they know nothing about the Congress, " nor do they care anything Ibr the Orders of the " Congress, and say th.at they would sooner lose their " lives than give up their Arms ; and that they would "blow any man's brains out, who should attempt to " take them from them. We are told," the writer continued, " that the people have been collecting " together, and parading, in sundry places, armed, " and firing their Muskets, by way of bravado. On " the whole, had we the Battalion " [Lasher's} " we " believe we should be able to collect a very cousider- " able number of good Arms and support the honour ol " Congress ; but without it, shall not — and think that " if the Battalion is sent up, the sooner the better." -' There are no known records of the doings of Gil- bert Drake and Captain William L)ut(dier, in their tours of pillage, among the conservative and peaceful farmers of Westchester-connty ; but there appears, from a brief mention which has been made, * Doctor Sparks noticed this (►utrage, in tliese words: " Tlie (_'iiniiiiittee " r«.i«oncd but iniiM-rfectiy from the facts of history iiuil the pi inciiilcs of " liiuniLU nature, when tliey stipposed tliat people, witii arms in tlieir " liands, would be tempted to resign them, by such motives as were held "out. They must either he treated as friends or enemies. If friends, "their safety and interest reipiired that the soldiers who were to pni- " tect their property and ilel'end their rights shouM he armed ; and the "call of patriotism would be the loudest that could be mailc to them. " While deaf to this call, Ihey would not he made to listen to the Orders "of a Committee or the Resolves of a Conjcress. If enemies, the sense *'of present danger, operating on the fii"st law of nature, would prompt "them to keep within their power, their only sure means of defem.'-. "In either case, the idea of taking away their arms, by a compulsory " impressment, had little to recommend it, either in policy or prudence." — {Life of (lonvtnieiir Mnrrix, i., G3.) The Doctor reasoned, above, on the ground that the Order of tlic Com- mittee wius an isolated act, disconnectetl with any other of the class ; and he rei\sV/v, "Jam.vii".^, September '2,'>th, 10 o'clock, l*.M." M^or Williams appears to have lieen a resident of (Queens-county. in other connections, that the men of that County, like those of (iueeus-county, armed themselves, and patroled the County, in large parties, to guard against surprises ; declaring their determination to defend themselves, and saying " that if any body came to " their houses to take away their Arms, they would " lire upon them." ' Itappears, also, that the declara- tion was fully sustained ; that the united farmers proved more than a match for the local Militia and the other troo})s which the Chairman of the County Committee had been authorized to call for his sup- l)ort ; and that, for the more effectual accomplish- ment of his purposes, that Chairman had assumed still further authority, by calling on the floating po])ulation of the neighboring Towns, in Connecticut, for reinforcements^ — as the Chairman of the County Committee wa.s authorized by the Committee of Safety, to call for the entire Militia of the County, already seem to have been sufficient to fill three Regiments,'' and as many of General Wooster's com- mand of Connecticut troops, then encamped below Harlem," and numbering "about 400 men," ' as should be ret|uired, that opposition must have been wide-spread and resolutely maintained, in Wesl- chester-county, which had retjuired, in addition to all these, for its supi)ression, an additional force, drawn from what may be properly called the Swiss Guards of Colonial America, mercenaries, who, while they i)rofessed to have been ardent friends ot Freedom, were, nevertheless, whenever they could see any possible advantage to their individual inter- ests, constantly ready to enlist in any service, out- side of Connecticut, and to become, in their new associations, the most devoted of all supporters of despotism and the most relentless of all persecutors of those, no matter of what country, who dared to (juestion the sanctity of the assumed authority of those who employed them. ^ Testimony of Colonel Gilbert Budd of Mmiiaroneelc^ before the I^orinrliil ( 'otitjrrns^ — Jtnintal of tlie Prorineial OnnjrtHs^ " Die \*eneris, 10 h4». A.M.. " November !i, ITiri," {vide jnitje 302, ptmt.) * This contlict between those who were executing the Orders of the f'uininittee of Safety, for the tlisarmameiit of those who had not signed tlie and those, in We.stchester-county, who were intended tu have been the victims vf the Committee's aggressive policy, has been studiously concealed by all who have written on the subject of the .\iuerican Revolution ; but the Provincial Congress, on the twelfth of December, gave the fonnal thaidvs of that boily "to those of the In- " habitants of the Colony of Connecticut, who so cheerfully gave "their aid, at the request of the Committee of Westchester-connly. " in the late suppression of the Insurgents in that Omnty, against the "cause of Liberty." {Jottnutl of the Prorinrial Ctoii/reint. "Die Marlis, 3 "ho.. P.M.. Deer. 12tli, 177.'>,") which is ample authority, for the i statenu-nt. in the text. I ■> See pages SKI, 282, 283, ante. I ''Oeneral Wottster and his connuand were encamped (»n property belonging to Arent Bussing, near Harlem, from the eighteenth of .lul>. preceding, {Jounml of Prorincial Co,iijr-ia, " Die Marti.s, !l ho., .\. M.. "July ISth, 177.'-..") ■ "General Wooster is at Harlem, with atwut 40<) men, which appear "to us to be unemployed," U.elliT from the Cintimitire of Safelij to the C'tm- tiiiental Cotujregu, "In Committkk of Savkty fok Till; Coi.onv ok Nkw " VoHK, nUKINO THE KF.<'K.r a "Cow-boy;" and, very probably, he was one. Bolton, in his Hialury of Weslcheater cuwdy, (original edition, i., 1S5, lfi6 ; the same, second edition, i., 248, 249,) gave a sketch and pedigree of the family. " refer you to Colonel Budd^ and Mr. Gill. Budd " Horton,* with whom Mr. Pinkney has conversed. " As we are only a Sub-committee appointed to take " the examination of Mr. Pinkney and such other " persons as might be necessary, and to make a Re- " port of our Proceedings to the Honourable the Pro- " vincial Congress, we beg leave to request that Mr. " Pinkney may be sent for and critically examined, " by the Congress, respecting the above matter, and " with relation to Oars being made by the request of " Captain Vandeput;^ and, also, that William Davis, " (who was employed in making the Oars,) and Sarah " Williams, the wife of Isaac Williams, of Westchester, " may also be sent for and examined as witnesses, " respecting them. " We also request that Mr. William Lounsberry,* " Isaac Gedney, Junior, and three hired men who " work at Justice Sutton's,' may be .sent for, on account " of what Mr. Piuckney has related, though not sworn " to, that they, among others, were Minute-men, as he "called them; that they were to be ready, at a " moment's warning, to take ott' some persons who " were the most obnoxious. " We would also request, when the others are sent " for, that the before-mentioned Isaac Gedney, Junior, " and William Nelson, .Foshua Boyea, Joshua Ferris, " Bartholomew Ilains, Elijah Hains, William Hains, " and John Hains, be also taken and brought before " the Honourable Congress, for taking up arms to " rescue Elijah Weeks, who was brouglit before the " Committee upon a charge against him. Upon the " charge, we would mention the Widow Margaret " (iedney, of the White Plains, (where they left their " Arms), Job Haddon, of Hiirrison Precinct, Benjamin " Morrell, of New-York, and Isaac Sniffen, of Rye- " Neck, as witnesses. " " For evidence to the other charges, we beg leave to Uilbert Itiidd of Slaniaroneck, was Lieutenant-colonel of the Second Kegiinent of Westchester-county Militia, (HuiUirical Mumuicriijls, etc.: Milifnni llHiinix, xxvi., V.i—p'igiaW.i, 284, imle.) Itoltiin, in his IlisU'rii of WeKlrhfuter-comdy, (original edition, ii., 80, 81, .5(IU ; the saiio; second cilitiou, I'.i", Tl.^, 7Hi,) gave an account of his family. <(iil. Budd Horton, of Maniaroneck, was the only representative of that Town, in the County Committee of 1776-'7, {flistorical Maiimcriplji, etc.: Miinlluwous I'aperx, xxxviii,, 309.) He WiLS captured and carried away, by the Koyal troops or by the local loyalists, in 1777, (Hintorical Momm ripls, etc. : Petition, xxxiii., 71(1.) 5 Captain Vandeput commanded the Asia, man-of-war, then at New York, ('onceniing the making of these Oars, vide page 295, ante. » See page 302, post. ' "Jil.ue of tlie ]Mimite-nien, at W hite IMains, in February, 1770 ; and he was in i-oniniand of a Company, in the follow- ing Summer. He evidently left Westchester-county, soon afterwards, as he wa-s in the .\sseinbly of the State, in 1779-'S(I, representing Cumlier- laiid-county. 'Anthony Miller was Second Lieutenant of the Scarsdale and White Plains Company tif Militia, in 177'i, anil Captain of the S4iiue Company, in 177B. 'James Hurton, Junior, was proscrilx-d as a Tory, and ordered to b«' arrested in .Mine, 1770, (Hi^Un-icul Mttnitarripl ■, etc. : MinceWntevitK Puptrs^ XXX., 150.) ^Thisdate was, evidently, a clericjil error. It was, undoubtedly, in- tended for "the twenty-fifth ulliiiin," October 2.1, 17T6. •Of Godfrey Haines, his grievances, and his threats, see pages 291-290, ante. Judge Thomas" was Hon. John Thvinias, County Judge t)f West- chester-county, 1755-1777, and Member of the tienenil Assembly of the Colony, representing the county of Westchester, I74.i-'75, in which latter capacity the reader has already been made aci|uainted with him. " Although the project of carrying Judge Thomas away from his home, in 1775, if such a project was really entertained, was not carried out ; a similar project, in 1777, was successful ; and he wiis carried to New York, as Haines had been, and thrown into jirisou, iu that City, as Uaiuea had been, {oide page* 292, 293, uri/tf,) and died there. " particular place, to receive him from those that took "him. " Philip Pinckney. " Taken and sworn before me this " first day of November, 177"), "James Horton, Jcnr. "'- The Provincial Congress received the letter and the affidavit, and placed them on file, without taking any other action which was recorded on its Jouriial, than the making of an Order that Colonel Budd and Gil. Budd Horton, who had evidently taken those papers to the Congress, should attend that body, at five o'clock, on the same afternoon.'-' At the appointed hour, those gentlemen made their appearance before the door of the Assembly Chamber, in the City Hall, in which the Congress was assembled in secret Ses- sion ; and when they were admitted into the Cham- ber, they were duly examined — the testimony of Gil. Budd Horton, however, was evidently so entirely use- less that it was not reduced to writing, and, conse- quently, no portion of it was entered on the Journal of the Provincial Co/igrrxs. The testimony of Colonel Gilbert Budd, as it appears on that Jo in- /> a I,'* is in these words : "Col. Gilbert Budd and Giibudd Horton, from "Westchester C^ounty, attending according to order, " were called in, and examined ; and the examination "of (xilltert Budd was taken in writing, and filed, and "is as follows, to wit : " Gilbert Budd, of Maniaroneck, says that the tories "are getting the upper hand of and threaten them, "daily, and have injured their private property, by " throwing down stone fences and cropping his horses' "tails and manes; that Piiilip Pinckney told him, " last Sunday, that he was in company, on the tweiity- " fifth of October last, with a man who told him tiiat " there would be bad times in Mamaroneck, before "long; and said that some of the people of "the place would be taken off; that he, Pinek- " ney, asked the man that told him, how they were to " be taken off ; he answered, that they expected a ten- "der, in tlie harbour, in a few days; and that she " would send barges on shore, in order to carry the "people off"; that he, Pinckney, further asked the " man, where they were to be carried to, and he an- "swered, ' To Ciage.' Mr. Budd told Pinckney tliat " Crage was not there; he answered, 'To Gage's " 'Army ; ' that I'inekney said he asked the man, who " the men were that were to be taken off"; that the t-The entire prostration of the Colonial (tovernment, in New York, and its entire helplessness Ui protect the Colonists from the outniges to which they were subjected by the promoters of the Kebellion, is nowhere more clearly seen than in this appearance of one of those who were in rebellion, l>efore one of the King's Justices of the Peace, to make an olti- cial aindavit concerning a plot to <'arry away from his home, one of the leaders iu that Rebellion, by those who were nut in rebellion. " Jouniul of tlie fVurincial < 'uiigrew, "Die Veneris, III ho,, .\.M., No- "veniber3d, 1775." 1< Juurtiol uf the Provincial Oiigrcss, " Die Veneris, 5 ho., P. 31.. Noveni- " ber 3, 1775." 302 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " man intimated to him that Mr. Gilbert Budd " [the witness] "and Mr. Samuel Townsend' were the men " that were to be taken off ; and that there was another "that they would have, at all events; that Pinekney "told Budd that lie asked the man, who the other " man was that was to be taken ofl"; that the man an- " swered him that Judge Thomas was the man, who "they would have if it co.st them the lives of fifty " men ; that Pinekney told the said l\Ir. Budd that "there was a number of his, Budd'.s, neighbour.^, who " stood ready to assist the tender, in order to take "them; that Mr. Budd asked Pinekney if he knew^ " who those neighbours were ; he answered that one "of them was William Lounsberry - and one, Isaac " Gedney, Junr., and all Sutton's men, alluding to "some hired servants of Sutton's ; ' that Pinekney " said he came as a friend, and advised Mr. Budd to " keep out of the way, for that he did not think it safe " for him to sleep in his house, one night. Mr. Budd "further says that he heard that Godfrey Haines said " that he was going to get a parcel of Gars made for "the man of war; that Haines came to iMamaroneck, "and that the next day, Isaac Gedney set about mak- " ing Oars; that they were making (as Budd uiider- " stood) by Haines's order, for Capt. Vandeput. Mr. " Budd says the tories are eijuipped, and constantly " in arms, walking about, at night, 6, 8, and 10 at a "time. Mr. Budd further says that it is reported that "those tories say they are determined to defend tiieni- " selves; and that if any body came to their houses to "take away their Arms, they would fire upon them.' The Congress appears to have been in one of it^ j temperate moods when that delegation from tlu chivalry of ( 'olonial Westchester-county, bearing th( missive from the Goinmittce of that County and it^ kindred Affidavit, approached its doors; and for that reason, unless it was because of the siiallovvness of the ! several accusations and re()ue.sts which were in the papers or of the poltroonery of those who bore them the Congress did no more than to order the letter and affidavit and examination to be filed; to charge all who knew of "this mattei," "to keef) the whole of it "a secret;" and to transmit a letter to the Committeeol Westchester-county — the latter, the most noteworthy 1 Samuel Townseiiil represented the Tiiwn of Kye, in tlie County Com- mittee of 177ii-'7. - On tlie tweuty-ninth of .\ugust, ITTii, "one I.ounsl)erry of Westcliester '' County who had headed a party of ahoiit 14 Tories wsis killed by a I'er- '*son named Flood on his refusal to surrender himself Prisoner ; That in *'hi8 Pocket hook was found a O'tiuniission signed hy Genl. llow to " Major Rogers empowering him to raise a Battalion of Rangers with the "Rank of Lieut (^ol Coninianilant. Thai annexed to tin's Wiis aWarranl " U) this Louiisherry signed by Major Rogers appointing him Cajitain in " one of these Companies .V a Muster Roll of the men already enlisted," [Letier fr(mi the OmmiW'e uf HiifHij t/t Hi'ui'i-al WitshitiijUni, " Is CnMjirr- " TKE OF Safktv, Harlem, Augt liOtli, 177G." ) Very probably, the William Lounsberry who is mentioned in the tex( was the same Lounsberry who had accepted a ('ommission from Majoi Rogers, and wa* killed, in August, 177ri, as stated in the letter. 3 The Sutton referred to was William Sutton, Ksq., living on lie Lan cey'd Neck, of which he w;us the tenant, [rub- piu/e '^W}^ atitf.) that it did, in "this matter" — of which the fol- lowing is a copy : " In Provincial Congress, "At New-York, November 3rd, 1775. " Gentlemen : " We received a letter of the 1st inst., from the "Sub-committee of your County, relative to the " conduct of the people of Rye ; and the Congress "have directed me to recommend to your Com- "mittee to make an immediate and strict inquiry "into the matters to which the letter refers, and "to take the examinations on oath of the wit- "nesses; and if you find satisfactory reasons to sup- " pose the persons threatened to be in danger, that " you take the proper means to protect them ; perhaj)s " the binding over to the peace such persons as may "be strongly suspected of a design to injure the per- "sons or estates of those gentlemen, may be a useful " expedient.* If anything afterwards shall be thought " necessary to be done, for their further protection, "the Committee will attend to it. If you should " find the County unable to give the necessary pro- "tection, you will transmit the examinations to us, " that the Congress may take such order therein, as " may be proper. The Committee may rest assured "that this Congress will support the friends of " Liberty, to the utmost of their power. " We are. Gentlemen, your humble servants, "By order of the Provincial Congress, "Abraham Y'ates, ,1r., Pres'l. "To Gilbert Drake, Esq., Chalninui "of the ('(Diiuiittee of Wtatchestcr-couiitij"'-' The suggestion which was made in this letter, that those of the revolutionary faction, in Westchester- cdunty, whose safety was imperiled by the threats of their conservative and law-abiding neighbors, should go before the King's Magistrates and ask that the latter should be put under bonds to keep the peace towards the former, vviis received witli disfavor by Isaac Sears, of New York, and Melancton Smith, of Diiche.ss-county, and Doctor Lewis Graham and John Thomas, Junior— the latter a son of one of those who had been threatened with removal from the County — and an attempt was made by them to strike out from the letter that portion " which refers them " [tlie Committee of Westchester-county'] "to the Civil Magis- " trate ; " but the Congress declined to make the * This remarkable suggestion, that those, in Westchester-county, who were in rebellion, and who were threatened with arrest by those of their neighboi-8 who were not in rebsllioii, should go before the King's Justices of the Peace, and ask that those loyal inhabitants who were inclined to support the Home and Colonial Governments and the Laws and to arrest those who Vicre n\ raheWiun^ tihimld he put under b(ymls tn pmen-e the pence tumird the lulter, will be didy appreciated by the reader. Whatever the County Committee of Westchester-county may have thought of it, it will be evident to the reader that the Provincial Con- gress, when it wrote to that Committee and mailc that suggestion, was not inclined to regard the men of Westchester-county who were in rebellion as entitled to very much of its respect and sympathy. '■' Juuriial uf the Pioi inciul Cviigrets, " Die Veneris, 5 ho., P.M., Novem- " ber3, 1775." THE AMKRTCAN REVOLUTION, 1774-178:1 303 solicited change, only the four gentlemen already mentioned having arisen in favor of it. The letter was tiansiuitted to the Westchoster-eoiinty Committee; and iiotliiiig more was heard on the subjects referred to; and the Connnittee itself, thenceforth, gradually disappeared from the notice of tlie world. The Provincial Congress had continued in session, closely witiulrawn from the sight of its constituents, until the eighth of July,' when it ha/(Ae CinamUtee of Stifelii, July 11, uutil July 2.5, 1775. ' Joumul of Ihe ProeincuU Congrew, fiolu July 20, until Septcuilier 2, 1775. * Jotiriml of Ihe CommilUe of >^fil;i, from Seiili'iulwr I, \iMtit OctobiT 3, 1775. ' Jounfil of Ihe PrueituUil Cvngrem, from October 4, until Noveuibor 1, 1775. methods of administration which, in the unrestrained exercise of its recently acquired, but undisputed, power, and of its seemingly cultured intellect, that revolutionary faction had practically regarded as tit and proper for the government of a " free people." ***** x- * During the interval, between the dissolution of the first and the organization of the second of the series of Provincial Congresses which controlled the destinies of the Colony of New \'ork and crowded an unwilling community into rebellion and ruin, an illustration was made, first in the County of Westchester and then in the (.-ity of New York, of the spirit of the controlling power, among the disaH'ected ; of the shallowness of the prevailing pretensions to patriot- ism and personal integrity in those who were en- gaged in the revolt; and of the ])ers()nal character of the ruttians who were employed — as they had been employed in the Stamp-act and other riots, earlier in the struggle of parties— by those who were the master- spirits, in the works of lawlessness by means of which the Rebellion was promoted and established and made respectable." At that time, there was no lu-wspaper-press in the Colonies which was conducted with greater ability than Rivingtou's ^'ew-y'ork (iazefteer ; or Coiiiin fimt, Hudson's River, New-Jerfeii, find Quehcrk WreL-lij Ad- rertixer, which was published, weekly, by James Riv- ington, in the (]!ity of New York. It was a news- ])aper, in the proper sense of the word ; and it pub- lished the news of the day, from every (juarter of the world, regardless of their political character, with rare industry and the most liberal impartiality. Ft did not accord with the interests of some nor with the passions of others, however, that such a faithful recorder of the sayings and (h)ings of every faction and of every i)arty should be continued in the Col- onies; and there were times, also, when the exposure of the double dealings of particular individuals, of high as well as of low degree, in wcll-{)rinted columns, in a widely circulated newspaper, as .James Rivington had done, in his (lazrttirr, were distasteful to those who were thus ex[>osed and unwelcome to those whom the culprit was serving. It was evidently determined, therefore, that James Rivington should be silenced; and that his only means for inflicting pain on the persons of those who favored the Rebellion should be taken from him. There was, also, at that time, no one, in the Colony of New York, who possessed greater intellectual and executive abilities combined with superior scholastic attainments, than Samuel Seabury, a Missionary of the Society tor the Propagatiim of the CJospel in Foreign Parts, ordinarily known as "The Venerable "Society," Rector of the Established Church in the 8 "This I know, a successful resistance is a 'Kkvomtion,' not a ' Ke- " ' BKi.i.ioN.' • Rebki.i.ion,' iuilpeil, u|ipo«iison the back of a Hying en- " univ : but ' Revoi.i thin ' tlaniee on the breastplate of the victorious i " warrior."— (John Wilkes, iii Ihe Unuse <>f Ommfiu, February 6, 1775.) 304 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Borough Town of Westchester, and Master of a Boarding-school for Boys, in the same Town. He was the friend and Pastor of Isaac Wilkius, the able leader of the conservative majority of the Opposition, in the General Assembly of the Colony; and the Manor of Morrisania was within the boundaries of his Parish ; and the Morrises, brothers-in-law of Isaac Wilkins, but masquerading as leaders in theRebellion, were, nominally, if not in reality, among his parish- ioners. He was learned, as was well-known : he was fearless in the declarations and support of his well- considered opinions, as was known to his neighbors and friends: that his convictions led him to support the conservative portion of the Opposition, led by his j friend, Isaac " Wilkins, is more than probable : that the same convictions led him to oppose, within the circle of his influence and consistently with his min- | isterial duties, the doings of the revolutionary faction of the Opposition, among whom his neighbors and parishioners, the Morrises, were capering, was no secret. When the press was teeming with publications, ad- verse to the violence of the revolutionary faction, he was improi)erly designated as one of the very few who had written them, with no other evidence to support the j allegation than his recognized ability and fearless- ness ; and when "A. W. Farmer " appeared, with his practiseil and powerful pen, arousing the most violent bitterness of those who were in rebellion, the intellectual rustic who had written them, by common consent, wsis erroneously but reasonably said to have i been the Schoolmaster and Parson at Westchester, | while the real but unrecognized author of the obnox- ! ious ])ublications wiis generally i)assed, unnoticed. The political Parson, therefore, was very offensive to those of the revolutionary faction who were not his neighbors — " in justice to the rebels of East and West " Chester, I must say," he wrote, in 1770, " that none ! " of them ever offered me any insult or attempted to do [ '■ me any injury that I know of" — and it was evidently ' determined that he, also, like James Riviugton, should be silenced, even at the expense of his personal liberty and of all which was dear to him, on earth. There was one man, more than all others, who was qualified to enter on any adventure, no matter how lawless nor how atrocious, provided, and only pro- vided, he could have an abundant force to support him and to overpower any oi)position which might possibly arise to obstruct or to endanger him. He had been a privateer, in the War with France and Spain ; and in the only encounter which he had had with an enemy, he had shown the white feather of cow- ardice, his crew having become his accusers. He was known, subsequently, as one of those blustering, reck- less, law-defying leaders of the floating denizens of the docks, in New York, ready to disregard all Rights, all of every thing excepttheir own wills, in acts of which only the traditional pirates and banditti were sup- posed to have been capable of performing, whenever, and only whenever, in his judgment, those acts could be done without personal risk to the aggressors, and whenever, and at no other time, those acts of lawless- ness promised that the plunder to be secured there- from would afford a sufficient compensation. He had married the daughter of the keeper of a low, unlicensed alehouse, a resort of sailors, boatmen, stevedores, and such as they, opposite to Beekman's Slip, and that alehouse was his rendezvous ; ' and those who had resorted to Jasper Drake's, had always been his ready instruments, in whatever acts of vio- lence in which he had ventured to engage. He had never possessed the enljre confidence of the leaders of the revolutionary faction of the Opposition, in the City of New York : he had never been taken into the siiiir/iiiii saiirfonim of that coterie of Livingstons and of Smiths and of Scotts, whose had been the unseen master-hands by whom such puppets as he had been handled and made conspicuous : he had never been permitted to occupy any place, in Committee or in Congress, unless in minorities which, because of their comparative insignificance, were incapable of disturb- ing the harmony of the aggregate bodies into which they had been adroitly introduced. At the time of which we write, he was an ignorant blusterer, as vain as he was ignorant; and he needed only, as General Charles Lee said of him, " to have " his back clapped " by some one in authority and to be shown that it would be useful to himself — if he could be vested with an oftice, no matter what nor how ephemeral in its character nor how " impu- " dently " bestowed, so much the better — to be ready, at short notice, to exercise his entire power, as a ruf- fian of the dirtiest water, in any required act of law- lessness, regardless of any Rights of Person or of Prop- erty, or of any claim which age or sex might inter- pose. He called himself a Merchant, in the City of New York ; but he had been more conspicuous in shipping Merchandise and Provisions to the eastward, clandestinely, when such shipment.s to the eastward were interdicted, than in any more legitimate busi- ness. He had been a member of the recently dis- solved Provincial Congress, during a portion of its existence ; but, in entire harmony with his earlier proclivities, when there were threatenings of danger from the Home (iovernment, he had abandoned the 'A letter from .luliii Case, from the County of Suft'olk, on Long Islanil, "to the Printer of the \rii--Ynrk 'IdzeUeer," and pulilished in Hii-'mtjImCfi Scw-York rincipal tories there, and secure the persons of Pareon Seabury, " Judge Fowler, and Lord Underbill." * * » (The Connecticut Journal, No. 424, [Xcw-Huven,] Wednesday, November 29, 1775.) Frank Moore, in his Mirii of the American Revolution, (i., SiO-S.n,) published a mutilated version of that editorial article, from the original of which the above was extracted — the other portions of tlie latter of which will be used hereafter — and credited it to The Pennsylvania Journal, published in Philadelphia, on the ninth of December. 2 In the preceding September, Lord Dunniore, then at Norfolk, in Vir^iinia, had hel]K'd himself to the type and printing-press of John Holt, in that Town ; and it was said of the thief and his confederates, " a few "spirited gentlemen in Norfolk, justly incensed at so flagrant a breach "of good order and the Constitution, and highly resenting the conduct "of Lord Dunmore and the Navy Gentry, who have now conmicnccd "downright Pirates and Banditti, ordered the drum to beat to arms," etc. {Ejrtract from a contemporurj) jmblication, in Force's American Archive«, Fourth Series, iii., 847.) Besides the entire fitness of the words to distinguish those who were guilty of such lawless doings, a precedent for the usi of those otherwise strong terms in such specific connections, is afforiled in the above ex- tract, from unquestionably revolutionary authority ; and we offer no apol- ogy for applying one or both of them to those, from Connecticut, on the oc- casion now under notice, when Lord Dunmore wnsfar outdone, in wan- ton atrocity. •28 ards, Silleck, and Mead.' It was not pretended that these enterprising Connecticut-men- had any other warrant to engage in such an undertaking, than that afforded in the propensity of every cowardly thief to plunder those who were known to have been strip- ped of their means for defence, and who were, there- fore, helpless. It was not pretended that any of the proposed victims, in the instance under notice, had said or done anything, in opposition to the Re- bellion, which had made them amenable to the un- bridled caprices of those who were in rebellion ; and it was evident that, had those proposed victims thus transgressed against the " Associations " or the " rec- " ommendations " or the " Resolutions " of the revolu- tionary authorities, the local Committee in West- chester-county, or the Provincial Congress in the City of New York, or the Committee of Safety of the last-named body, and not an improvised and self- constituted power, in another Colony, was the proper tribunal to take cognizance of such an offence. But in such a party, led by such a ruffian, only the law of the will of the stronger jjossessed any authority or secured any respect; and that law of "the pirate " and the banditti," unfortunately, prevailed in the instance now under notice. The expedition evidently moved slowly, on its way to New York ; * and, especially after it had passed the Byram-river, it undoubtedly foraged on those who were unfortunate enough to live on the line of its march. It pillaged the farm-houses; and, at Mamaroneck, it burned a small sloop which be- longed to one who was assumed to have been a friend of the Government.* A detachment of about forty men, under a Captain Lothrop, appears to have been pushed forward to the Town of Westchester, where, on Wednesday, the twenty-second of Novem- ber, it seized the person of Nathaniel Underbill, the Mayor of that Borough, and that of the Rev. Samuel Seabury, who, as we have said, was the Master of 5 "On their way thither" [for East and West Chester,] "they were "joined by the Captains Richards, Scillick, and Meaii, with about 80 "men." * * » (The Omttecticut Journal, t\0. 424, [Nkw Il.vvEx] Wed- nesday, November 2U, 1775.) It is due to the respectable portion of the inhabitants of the Connecti- cut of that period, that mention should be made of the fact that no such names as these appear on the lists of Officers of Connecticut Companies, in 177.5, which Mr. Ilinnian published in his JlisVtricul O'lleelions <•/ the part sujituinedbt/ O'Unectivut ditriu(j the War nf the lierohiti'in ; and that it is very probable that these three " Captains," like that other " rai)tain " who led them, on that occiision, pos,sessed no other warrant than that of ■'courtesy," so called, for the privilege of carrying the title. * It left New Haven on Monday, the twentieth of November ; but it did not reach Westchester until Wednesday, the twenty-second, and the City of New York, to which place it extended its excursion, until noon on Thureday, the twenty-third of that month. ' " At Marinek they btniit a small sloop, which was purchased by Gov- " eminent, for the puriwse of carrying provisions on board the Asia." — (The Cmtneclicut Journal, No. 424, [New H.wex,] Wednesday, November 2'J, 1775.) ><*«•« and burnt one sloop belonging to persons friendly to gov "ernment." — (Oovenuv Tryon to the Earl nf Itartmouth, No. 22. "O.N " Bo.tRn THE Ship Dutch es.-; oe Goiidon New Youk ILmibour, G"' Dec' "1776." 306 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. a Boarding-school and Rector of the Established Church, in the same place, the former, as was sub- sequently seen, only because he had signed the Declaration and Protest, at the White Plains, in the preceding April,^ the latter, because he was more obnoxious to those Avho were in rebellion, in conse- quence of his greater intellectual power and of his decidedly greater bravery in the assertion and maintenance of his opinions and of his Rights.^ Having accomplished its purposes in the seizures of the persons and in the plunder of the properties of the two victims, in Westchester, the detachment per- mitted Mr. Seabury, if not Mr. Underhill, to send for his horse ; and, then, it hastened away, on the road which connected that Town with Kingsbridge. It had not proceeded far, however, when it was met by the main body of the banditti, with whom, with characteristic cowardice, was Sears ; and the entire party then returned to Eastchester, where, on its way toward New York, it had already seized the person of Jonathan Fowler, who was one of the Judges of the Superior Court of Common Pleas and Colonel of one of the Battalions of the Colonial Militia, against whom, also, it seems there was no other complaint than that he, also, had signed the Declaration and Protest, at the White Plains, in the preceding April.' The contemporary records do not present the cir- cumstances which attended the seizure of the Mayor of the Borough of Westchester ; but it is probable they were similar to those which attended the similar seizure of Judge Fnwler and that of Mr. Seabury — the banditti undoubtedly ransacked the house and examined his papers and helped themselves to such articles of his movable property as best pleased them. From Judge Fowler's house, there were carried away a beaver hat, a silver-mounted horse- whip, and two silver spoons,* besides the sword, gun, and pistols which formed portions of his offi- cial equipments as a Colonel in the Colonial Militia;^ and at Mr. Seabury's, besides assaulting one of that gentleman's daughters, thrusting a bayo- net at her breast and through her cap, and tearing down her hair, the marauders cut a quilt which was in the frame, rendering it useless; examined his 1 See pages 248-250, ante. 2 " At East Chester they seized Judge Foicler, then repaired to West *' Chester and secured Seabury and Underhill." — {The Cotinecticitt Journal, No. 424, [New Haven',] Wednesday, November 29, 1775.) In his Memorial to the General Assembly of 0>niieclicut, Seabury ex- pressly stated that he was arrested by a detachment ; that the main body of the party was subsequently joined, by the detachment ; and that all, then, returned to East Chester. 3 J/emorifi! «/ Samuel Seabury lo the General Assembli/ of Connecticut, December 20, 1775. See, also, The Cunnecticul Journal, No. 424, [New H.ive.n,] Wednesday, November 29, 1775 ; Jones's Hi^tttry of Sew YurTc durimj the Revolutionary War, i., 66, G7 ; etc. * Memorial of Samuel Seabury to the General Asfembly of Connecticut, De- cember 20, 1775. & Jones's History of Keic York during the Rerolutionnri/ War, i., 67. private papers and scattered them ; and carried away a small sum of money, which was in the drawer of his desk. Of course, the Boarding-school for Boys, . which he had organized and establi-hed with so much labor,* for the better support of his family, was broken down ; and the pupils, five of whom were from Jamaica and one from Montreal, the parents of four others being in Europe, besides " others from " New York and the country," were necessarily scat- tered, inflicting an irreparable injury to him and to his large and dependent family.' When these seizures had been accomplished and after what had been stolen had been sufliciently secured, another detachment from the main body of the banditti was sent back to Horseneck [ West Green- wich, Connecticut,^ as an escort and guard of the three prisoners and of the booty ; ^ while the main body, itself, numberingseventy-five mounted men, moved for- ward, from East Chester, toward the City of New York.' Where that large body of horsemen spent the fol- * The following advertisement, copied from Sivington's Xew-York Ga- zetteer, No. 97, New-York, Thursday, February 23, 1775, will clearly in- dicate the high character of that Colonial Westchester Boarding-school tor Boys, probably the prototype of those similar institutions, in more recent days, which have made Westchester-county so widely known, in the world of Education : "To the Public, "SAMUEL SEABURY, M.A. " Rector of the Parish of Westchester, ~l r.VTH opened a School in that Town, and offers hie Service to -* — " prepare young Gentlemen for the College, the Compting- " House, or any genteel Business for which Parents or Guardians may "design them. Children who know their Letters will be admitted to " his School, and taught to read English with propriety, and to write it "with a fair Hand, and with gnimmatical accuracy. They will be in- "structedin Arithmetic, if required, in its utmost extent; and in the " Elements of Geometry ; in Trigonometry, Navigation, Surveying, etc. " — The Latin and Greek Languages will be taught those who are in- " tended for a learned Education. "There are already eleven Students nnder Mr. Seabury's Care, and as "soon as the Number of Scholars shall require it, a good Usher will be " provided : And no Care or Uiligence shall be wanting to give Satisfac- " tiou to those Gentlemen who shall favor him with the Education of " their Children. *■ Proper attenti< n will be paid to the young Gentlemen, that they be " kept clean and decent, and that they behave with propriety ; and aa " the most essential Part of Education is to qualify- them to Disciiarge "the Duties and Offices of Life with Integrity and Virtue, particular "Care will be taken to explain to them the Principles of Morality, and "the Christian Kcligion, by frequent short Lectures, adapted to their " Capacity. " Board, (Washing included) may be had, in unexceptionable Fami- "lies, at about twenty Pounds per Ann. and the Tuition will be six " Pounds, New-York Currency, and eight Shillings for Fire-wood. "Westchester is about nineteen Miles from New York, by Land, and "about fifteen by Water; and a Water i)aseage may be had almost " every Day, when the Weather will permit, in good safe Boats." " Memorial of Samuel Seabury to the General Asionbiy of Connecticut, De- cember 20, 1775. ' " Having possessed themselves of these three caitiffs, they sent them "to Connecticut under a strong guard." — (The Connecticut Journal, No. 424, [New Havex,] Wednesday, November 29, 1775.) See, also, Memorial of Samuel Seabury to the General Assembly of Coii- neclicnl, December 20, 1775. ' The Connecticut Journal, No. 4.;4, [New Haven,] Wednes Dec 1775" ; Petition of the General Committee of the O/.v and County of Anc York to the ProrincinI Cotigrest, {ritle page 1.14 pott ;) (he Provincial Congrett of Xeic York to the Goternor of Connecticut, " In Provincial Congress, New- '• York, 12th Deer. 1775 ; " Jones's History of Xfu; York during the Rero- httionary War, i., 66 ; etc. portions which could not be taken away, and demol- ishing, also, his presses and other office-material.* It is said that three quarters of an hour were spent in that work of reckless destruction, without the slightest attempt by cither the Municipal or the Colonial authorities, legal or revolutionary, to inter- fere, for the preservation of the peace or for the protection of the property of the citizen or for that of the freedom of the Press ; and, consequently, after its appetite for outrage had become satisfied, taking with it the type which it had not destroyed and such articles from the Bookstore as were fancied by those who entered it,® the banditti mounted its horses, its music striking up the tune of Yankee Doodle, and its local sympathizers in the Square and around the head of the Coffee-house Slip giving it cheers which were returned, and left the City by the same route as that on which it had entered it.' 5 "A email detachment entered it," [the printing-office,] "and in about "three-quarters of an hour brought off the principal part of his types, " for which they offered to give an order on Lord Dunmoro " [who had previously stolen John Holt's type and prei's, at Sorfolk,] (The Connecti- cut Journal, No. 424, [New Haves,] Wednesday, November 29, 1775.) They "entered his" [Hivington' s] "house, demolislied his printing "apparatus, destroyed a part and carried off the remainder of his "types." — (Jones's History of Xew York during the Revolutionary War, i. , 66.) See, also, Governor Tryon to the Earl of Dartmouth, No. 22, " On " Board the Ship Dutchess of Gordon New York Harbour, 6"' Dec "1'775 ;" etc. 8 Governor Tryon to the Earl of Dartmouth, No. 22, "On Board the Ship " Dutchess of Gordon New York Harbour Dec 1775." ' " They then faced and wheeled to the left, and marched out of town to " the tune of Yankee Doodle. A vast concourse of people assembled at "the Coffee House bridge on their leaving the ground, and gave them "three very hearty cheers."— (T/ie Connecticut Journal, No. 424, [New Havex,] Wednesday, November 29, 1775.) The Petition of the General Commillee of the City and Ontnty of New York, laid before the Provincial Congress, on the eighth of December, 1775, presented the general facts of the outrage on .James Kivington, whil* it also called for the protection of the City, by that body. The de-tpatch of Go vertwr Tryoti to the Earl of Dartmouth, No. 22, "On Board the ship "DuTrHE.ss OF Gordon New York Harbour G"" Dec 1775," described the raid on Westchester-county as well as that on the City of New York, and narrated the blustering threats which were made by Sears, to return with "a more numerous body of the Connecticut Riotere and to take "away the Records of the Colony." The letter of the Provincial Congress to the Governor of Connecticut, " In Provincial Congress, New- York, "12th Deer., 1775," recited the outrage in Westchester-county as well as that in the City ; but in such delicate terms as indicated that that tody was either in sympathy with the banditti or was intimidated by those who were so. Judge Jones, in his Histonj of New Y'rk during the Revolu- tionary War, (i., 65-68,) noticed the entire raid, saying that Sears "en- "tered the town at the head of about 20() men, well mounted," which, from the context, evidently included those who had gone out to meet the banditti. Gordon, {History of the .Imericon Revolulion, London: 17S8, ii. , 121, 12'2.) made mention of nothing else than of the robbery of the printing-office, of which ho said, " While thus employed, people col- " lected, and the street was thronged. To prevent interruption, he called "out and told them that if they attempted to oppose him, he would "order his men to Are on them ; and preparation was made for doing it, " in case it should be needful. This appearance instantly cleared the " street, when Captain Sears and his party rode off in triiiniph, with the " Iwoty they were pleased to take away." Dunlap, ( History of New York, ii., .\ppeudix, ccxx,) erroneously stated that the destruction of the printing-office was effected " by the Ouinflclicut Light Horse," on the fourth of December. Bancroft, {History of the I'niUd Stales, original edit, viii., 275,) said Sears was "vexed at his want of influence, iniimtient ut "being overlooked, and naturally inclined to precipitate counsels;'" and in the same work, centenary edition, v., 184, the same author stated 308 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. The progress of the banditti, through Westchester- county, on its return, was necessarily slow, since it finished, at that time, the work of pillage among the farmers of that County, which it had c(>mmenced on its outward march — it left the City of New York on Thursday, at two o'clock ; and it did not reach Horse-neck, where the detachment which was guard- that Sears "deserved a high appointment in the American JJai-y," which lie did nut receive ; that he was " impatient at being overlooked," etc. Not the slightest allusion is made to the doings of the banditti in Westchester-county, in either of the editions of that much-praised work. Lossing, {Field Book of (he Revohdioyi, ii., 7911, 797,) stated that Mr. Riving- ton " aided by his Koyal Gazetteer," was very influential ; that he had no regard for the truth nor for "common fairness ; that Sears had gone to Connecticut " to plan schemes for the future with ardent Whigs ; " that the type which was stolen from Rivington was converted into bullets; etc. ; but the truth is that tlie Eoynl Uiizette was not established until December, 1777, as he had stated on the opposite jiageof the Field Book; that Rivington publifhed everything of news and political papers, re- gardless of party ; that Sears had removed his family and himself to New Haven, to get out of the way of threatened danger and to pout over personal grievances ; and that the printers in Connecticut were too glad to increase their limited suj>p]i( s of type to convert the stolen type be- longing to Rivington into bullets, for vhich cinimon and far cheaper lead was better adapted. Rev. Doctor Beardslej*, {UiMonj of the Fpiscopul Church in iYmieclietd, i., S02-3UO, and Life find Correspondence of the lit. Ilev. Seminel Seobiiry, L.D., 35-47,) apiiropriately noticed, iu detail, the dealings of the banditti with Mr. Seabury, without, however, making the slightest mention of what was done elsewhere than in Westcliestcr- county. In Connecticut, from that day to this, llie doings of that party of ruf- fians have been considered only as praiseworthy. Governor Trumbull, after having snubbed General Washingtuu by sheltering and justifying the wholesale desertion of the Connecticut troops which the latter had denounced, {Compare General Washington's letter to Governor Ti-nmhnll, "Cambrioiik, December 2, 1775," with the reply, "Leilvnun, December " 7, 1775 ; " that of the former, " CAMUKinuE, December 5, 177.')," with thereply, "Lebanon, December 9, 1775" ; etc.,) waited until the following June, before he paid the slightest attention to the letter which the Pro- vincial Congress had sent to him, in December, 1775, and then only to shelter, if not to jtistify, the offenders. (Jonn. Trumbull to the Honble. Nulhl. Woodhnll, "IIartkoku, June 10, 1775.") Minman, (Hi»t/>ricul C'ollectivn of the jiart sustained by Connectiivt dm inij the War of the Revolu- tion, 79, 80,) included that lawless raid among the notable and praise- worthy acts of Connecticut ; and the following, which is the latest speci- men which has met our eye, presents, at once, the satisfaction with which respectable men, of our own day, in Connecticut, continue to re- gard that outrage, and the character of what is circulated, in ^ew Eng- land, as veritable history: "Some time during the War, a paper was " published in the City of New York, by one, Rivington. This paper was " professedly and to all outward appearance devoted to the British in- " terests. It was afterwards, how ever, known to have aided the Amcr- " leans much, and was under the control of Washington himself The " hostile appearance of the sheet, however, deceived the Americans aa "well as their enemies, and about half a dozen Greenwich men re- " solved that the press should be stopped; they stole into the City, de- "stroyed the press, and bagged the type, which they brought off with "them from the very midst of a watchful enemy. Messrs. Andrew and " Peter Mead were the principal men of the expedition. It is said that " they only of the company were able to carry the bags of type from the "printing-office to the street and throw them across the backs of their '' horses. After the type was brought to Greenwich, it was totally de- " stroyed, except enough to print each of the company's names, which "the veterans kept for a long time in memory of their exploit." One might readily suppose this latest tidbit of what has currency as history, was written in China or Timbuctoo ; but the curious reader may find it in an elegant and e.\pensive History of Fairfield Cnnecticul, De- cember 20, 1775, iwfe poflc 1.36, post; and Jones's History of Xcw York during the Itevolutionary War, i., G6, 67. - Although the instruments of the recantation of these two of the three victims do not appear in The Connecticut Journ Dec' 1775.") The declarations of Colonel Waterbury and Isaac Scars, on the sam subject, subsequently, will be noticed hereafter. 310 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. occupied the harbor and commaaded all the ap- proaches to the City, by water, and by whom a large armed force could have been thrown into the City, to protect the inhabitants from such outrages as that which is now under consideration, meanwhile, re- maining, apparently unconcerned, without raising a hand or firing a gun for that principal purpose of their presence in the Colony. In the evening of the day on which the outrage on James Rivington was committed, {^Thursday, Novem- ber 23, 1775,] Lancaster Burling and Joseph Totten, members of the General Committee for the City and County of New York, offered a Resolution, in that body, citing Isaac Sears, Samuel Broome, and John Woodward to appear before it, to answer for their conduct in entering the City, on that day, with a number of horsemen, in a hostile manner, which the movers of the Resolution considered a breach of the Association ;^ but on the following evening, probably because it was distasteful to the greater number, Mr- Burling withdrew the Resolution,^ rather than to see it ignominiously defeated. Three days after the event, John Jay, with more self-respect and, certainly, with more respect for the honor of the Colony, notwithstanding he, also, ap- peared to take no interest in any other portion of the general subject, wrote a letter to the President of the former Provincial Congress, in which he warmly con- demned the proceeding f but, as has been stated, there was, then, no Provincial Congress to receive and to consider his protest. On the fifth of December, the General Committee of the City and County of New York returned to the subject and adopted a well-written Petition to the Pro- vincial Congress praying that that body would take measures to protect the inhabitants of the Colony from a renewal of such aggressions.* * Mttmips of the General CoinniHtec for the City and Cnantij of New Yorlc^ " Thursday, November 23, 1775." 2 Miimtis of the General Cnmmillee^ etc., "Friday, November 24, 1775." 3 The following are his words, on the subject of the raid : * * * "The New-England e.xploit is much talked of, and conjec- " turefl are numerous as to the part the Convention will tuke relative to " it ; some consider it as an ill compliment to the Government of the " Province, and prophesy that you have too much Christian meekness " to take any notice of it. For my own part, I uon't approve of the " feat ; and I think it neither argues much w sdom or much bravery ; at " any rate, if it was to have been done, I wish our own people, and not " strangers, had taken the liberty of doing it. " I confess I am a little jealous of tlie honour of the Province, and " am jiersuaded that its reputation can not be maintained without some " little spirit being mingled with its prudence." * Minutes of the General Committee of the City and County of Neu> York, " Tuesday evening, December 5, 1775." The record is in these words : " A Draft of a Petition to the honourable the Provincial Congress for " the Province of New-York, was read, and is as follows, viz. : " ' To THE Hoxouhable the Provi.n'cial Co.\gre.ss for the Prov- ' ' INCE of New- York. " ' The Petition of the General Committee for the City and County of "' New-York, humbly shewcth : "'That a body of troops,* from a neighbouring Colony, did lately * It is evident, from these words, that it was, then, supposed to have I Three days afterwards, \_December 8, 1775,] that vigorous demand for protection, made by the 1< cal revolutionary Committee of the City of New York — the Committee of Westchester-county made no such movement, nor any other, in the matter — was pre- sented to the Provincial Congress, by which body, after some time had been spent "in debates thereon," it was sent to a special Committee, of which John Morin Scott was the Chairman, with instructions to " report thereon with all convenient speed." ^ Four days subsequently, [December 12, 1775,] a Report was made by the Committee, with a draft of a letter to be addressed to the Governor of the Colony of Connecticut, "on the subject matter of the Gen- " eral Committee's Petition," both of which were violently opposed by those who were most revolution- ary in their inclinations. The debates were continued through two Sessions of the Congress, and various amendments were made in the letter, when it was adopted. Colonel Gilbert Drake and Stephen Ward, Deputies from Westchester-county, opposing the motion, and Colonel Lewis Graham, also a Deputy from that County, supporting it.® " 'make their publick entry into the City, at noon-day, and did seize " * and carry off the types belonging to one of the publick Printers of " 'this Colony, without any authority from the Continental or this Con- •* 'gress, your Petitioners, or any other body having power to grant " ' such authority. And being apprehensive thit such Incursions, " ' should they be repeated, will be [iroductive of many groat and evil con- " 'sequences to the Inhabitants of such place wherein they may be here- ' ' after made, your Petitioners do therefore conceive it highly necessary, *" in the present situation of publick affairs, as well for tliesakeof inter- " ' nal peace and harmony of eaidi Colony as for the miiintenancc of the " 'general union of the Continent, now happily subsisting, and so esscn- "' tial, at this juncture, that each of the a.s3ociated Colonies on the Con- " ' tinent should have the sole management and regulation of its publick " 'matters by its Congress or Committee, unless otherwise directed by " 'the honourable the Continental Congress. " ' Your Petitioners do therefore most humbly pray, that this honour- " 'able House of Delegates would be pleiised to take the premises into '" their consideration, and devise some expedient topievent, for the "'future, the Inhabitants of any of the neighbouring Colonies " ' coming into this, to direct the publick affairs of it, or to destroy the " 'property or invade the liberty of Its Inhabitnnts, without the direc- " 'tion of the Continental or this Congress, or the Committee of Safety, "' or the Committee of the County into which such Inhabitants may " 'come, or of the Continental Generals, unless there should be an Inva- " * sion made into this Colony. " ' And your Petitioners, as in duty bound, shall ever pray, etc. " ' By order of the Committee.' "Ordered, That the same be fairly copied, and signed by the Chair- " man of this Committee, and delivered to the Chairman of the Con- " gress." ^Journal of the Provincial Congress, "Friday morning, December 8, "1775." ^Journal of the Provincial Congress, "Die Martis, 10 ho., A.M., Decem- "ber 12, 1775;" and the same, "Die Martis, 3 ho., P.M., Deer. 12, "1775." The following is a copy of that very important letter: " In Provincial Congress, " New-York, 12th Deer., 1775. " Sir : "It gives us concern that we are under the necessity of addressing been a regular military operation : that the fact was, then, unknown, that it was only an inroad of banditti, winked at, it is true, but without any autiiority, legal or revolutionary : that the Committee did not even suspect that the raiders were only an organized band of robbers, com- posed only of the floating population of another Colony. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. The Governor of Connecticut, regarding with rea- sonable contempt tiie feeble, if not the hypocritical, outpourings of such a bashful, if not such a double- faced,' body as the Provincial Congress of New York then was — at the very moment when it was consider- ing the proposition to send a letter to him, on the subject of the raid which is now under notice, it was also balancing on the tight-rope of loyalty to the King and reconciliation with the Home Government, "you on a subject that haa given great discontent to the inhabitants of " the City and County of New-York. " We are informed by a Petition from tlie Gene'al Committee, that a *'body of troops from your Colony lately made a public entry into this " City, at noon-day, and seized and carried oft the types belonging to one "of the public priutei's, without any authority from the Continental or "tliis Congress or their Committee. " While we consider this conduct tvs an insult offered to this Colony, we "are disposed to attribute it to an imprudent though well-intended zeal " for the public cause ; and cannot entertain the most distant thought "that your Colony will approve of the measure. It is unnecessary to " use arguments to show the impropriety of a proceeding that has a " manifest tendency to interrupt that harmony and union which, at "present, liappily subsists throughout, and is so essential to the interest "of the whole Continent. It is our earnest desire that you would take " the most effectual steps to prevent any of the people of your Colony " from entering into this, for the like purposes, unless invited by our " Provincial Congress, a Couunittee of Safety, or the General Conimit- " tee of one of our Counties, as we cannot but consider such intrusions "as an invasion of our essential rights, as a distinct Colony ; and com- " nion justice obliges us to request that you will give orders that all the " types be returned to the Chairman of the General Committee of the " City and County of New-York. We beg you will not consider this re- "quisitiou as an attempt to justify the num from whom the types were taken : we are fully sensible of his demerits ; but w« earnestly wish "that the glory of the present contest for Liberty may not bo sullied by "an attempt to restrain the Freedom of the Press. " The same body of troops, we are informed, seized the Mayor of tiie " Borough of Westchester, the Hector of that Parish, and one of the "Justices of the County, and carried them to your Colony. Mr. Seabury, " we are informed, is still detained. If such should be the case, we must " entreat your friendly interposition for his immediate discharge; the " more especially as, considering his ecclesiastical character, which, per- " haps, is venerated by many friends to Liberty, the severity that has "been used towards him may be subject to misconstructions prejudicial "to the common cause, and the more effectually to restrain such incur- "sions which, if repeated, may be productive of mischief of the most se- " rious consequence ; and, as wo would be exceedingly sorry to give " room for jealousies among individuals in your Colony that we are "desirous to damp the spirit of Liberty or countenance any of its "enemies among us, we propose to apply to the Continental Congress, " not by way of complaint, but for such a general regulation, on this "subject, as may as well prevent such jealousies as any future incur- "sious by the inhabitants of either Colony into the other, for the appre- " bending or punishing any enemy or sujiposed enemy to the cause of "Liberty, without application to the Congress, the Committee of Safety, "or the Committee of the County within the jurisdiction of which such "persons shall reside, or command of the ContinentEi.i'HiA, 5th January, 17711.") The Governor of Connecticut having, meanwhile, taken no notice whatever of the letter which the Provincial Congres.s had written to him, in the preceding December, on the 8th of March, 1771), the latter informed the Delegation from New York in the Continental ('ongress, of that fact, (Jourmd of the 1\i>riucial Conyrem, "Die \ eneris, "10 ho., A.M., March 8, 1771) ;") but there seems to have been no .ic- tion, on that subject, in the former body, then or at any other time. 312 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. him and carried him from his home ; and he was thus held by that law-defying gang of ruffians, in one of the Capital-towns of Connecticut, in which the Legislature was, then, in session, without the slightest attempt, by the legally constituted Government of that Colony, to interfere, either for the rescue of the captive or for the vindication of the Law of the land, which had been indisputably violated by those who held him. As has been stated, the captive was not permitted to hold a free intercourse with his friends ; the use of pen, ink, and paper, unless for the purpose of writing to his family, was interdicted; and his correspondence with his family was subjected to examination by his captors. As a matter of favor, however, he was permitted to memorialize the General Assembly of the Colony within which he was held in captivity, although that Assembly had been dissolved by Proclamation of theGo.vernor,six days previously; and, because that Memorial is a portion of the revolu- tionary literature of Westchester-county, to say nothing of its importance as an authority in history, a place for it may be properly found in the text of this narrative.^ It was in the following words: " To THE Honorable General Assembly of the " Gov. AND Company of the Colony of Con- " NECTICUT, NOW SITTING IN NeW HaVEN, IN "said Colony, by special Order of his " Honor, the Governor. " The Memorial of Samuel Seabury, Clerk, A.M., " Rector of tiie Parish of We-it Chester, in the County " of West Chester and Province of New York, humbly " showelh : — " That on Wednesday, the 22d day of November " last, your Memorialist was seized at a house in " West Chester where he taught a grammar school, by "a company of armed men, to the number, as he "su[)poses, of ab(jut forty ; that after being carried to " his own house and being allowed lime to send for " his horse, he was forced away on the road to Kings- " bridge, but soon meeting another company of "armed men, they joined and proceeded to East " Chester. " That a person styled Captain Lothrop ordered " your Memorialist to be seized. That after the two "companies joined, the command appeared to your "Memorialist to be in Captain Isaac Sears, and the " whole number of men to be about one hundred. "That from East Chester your Memorialist, in com- 1 a portion of this notable paper was publislied by Hinmiin, in liis Hiittoricitl CoUeclions of the jiart snsfaiued bt/ Coinwclicut diirimj tkc War of the Remlutlmi, (pages 548-551.) Rev. E. E. Beardsley, D.D , in his Life avd Correspondence of the Jiigltt Iteverend Samuel Seahui-y, D.D., (Second Edition, 30-42,) i)ui>Iiblied as nearly a complete and accurate copy of it as those who printed liifl book would permit him to give to his readers. It is believed that, witli his kind assistance, we have the privilege of hiying an entirely accurate and complete copy of the original manu- script before our readere, from the copy of that original which was fur- nished to hin> by Charles J. Hoadley, the Librarian of the State Library, at Hartford, the custodian of that paper. " pany with Jonathan Fowler, Esq., of East Chester, " and Nathl. Underbill, Esq., of West Chester, was " sent under a guard of about twenty armed men^ to " Horseneck,' and on the Monday following was " brought to this town and carried in triumph through " a great part of it, accompanied by a large number " of men on horsback and in carriasjes, chiefly armed. " That the whole company arranged themselves before "the house of Captain Sears. That after firing two "cannon and huzzaing, your Memorialist was sent " under a guard of four or five men to the house of " Mrs. Lyman, where he has ever since been kept "under guard. That during this time your Memor- " ialist hath been prevented from enjoying a free inter- " course with his friends ; forbidden to visit some of " them, though in company with his guard ; prohibited " from reading prayers in the church, and in perform- " ing any part of divine service, though invited by "the Rev. Mr. Hubbard so to do ; interdicted the use " of pen, ink, and jiaper, except for the purpose of " writing to his family, and then it was required that " his letters should be examined and licensed before " they were sent off; though on Friday last, Captain " Sears condescended that your Memorialist should "be indulged in writing a Memorial to this Hon. "Assembly. That your Memorialist hath received "but one letter from his family since he has been " under confinement, and that was delivered to him " open, though brought by the post. " Your Memorialist begs leave further to represent, " that he hath heard a verbal account that one of his " daughters was abused and insulted by some of the " people when at his house on the 22d of November. " That a bayonet was thrust through her cap, and her "cap thereby tore from" [Aer] "head. That the " handkerchief about her neck was pierced by a bay- " onet, both before and behind. That a quilt in the " frame on which the daughters of your Memorialist " were at work was so cut and pierced with bayonets " as to be rendered useless. That while your Memo- "rialist was waiting for his horse, on the said 22d day " of November, the people obliged the wife of your " Memorialist to open his desk, where they examined "his papers, part of the time in presence of your " Memorialist. That he had in a drawer in the desk "three or four dollars and a few pieces of small sil- " ver. That he hath heard that only an English "shilling and three or four coppers were found in the " drawers after he was brought away. That your " Memorialist thinks this not improbable, as Jonathan " Fowler, Esq., informed him that a new beaver hat, a "silver-mounted horsewhip, and two silver spoons were "carried oft" from his house on said day. Mr. Meloy, " also, of this town, informed your Memorialist that 2 It will be observed that Mr. Seabury did not regard his captors as ''troops" or "Light Horse" or military men, of any class; he evi- dently considered them as what are known as" irregulars;" and, for that reason, called them only "armed men." Horse Neck of that period is West Greenwich of this. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 313 " he, the said Meloy, had been accused by some peo- pie of pointing a bayonet at the breast of a daughter ' of your Memorialist, desiring your Memorialist to ex- ' culpate him from the charge, to which request your " Memorialist replied that he was not at his house but " at his school house when the affair was said to have ' happened ; but that a daughter of your Memorialist " met him as he was brought from the school house, " and told him that one of the men had pushed a " bayonet against her breast and otherwise insulted "her; and your Memorialist remembers that when "he left his house in the morning his daughter had a ' cap on, but when she met him near the school " house she had none on and her hair was hanging " over her shoulders. " Your Memorialist, also, begs leave further to ' represent that ■ after he had been eight or ten days ' at New Haven, he was carried by Mr. Jonathan ' Mix, to whose care he was committed, to the house ' of Mr. Beers, innkeeper, in said town, where were ' Captain Sears, Captain Lothrop, Mr. Brown, and ' some others, whose names he did not know or does ' not recollect. That several questions were asked ' him, to some of which he gave the most explicit ' answers, but perceiving some insidious design ' against him by some of the questions, he refused to ' answer any more. That Captain Sears then ob- ' served to him, if he understood him right, that they ' did not intend to release him, nor to make such a ' compromise with him as had been made with Judge ' Fowler and Mr. Underbill,' but to keep him a pris- ' oner till the unhappy disputes between Great 'Britain and America were settled. That whatever " your Memorialist might think, what they had done " they would take upon themselves and support. ' Tliat your Memorialist then asked an explicit de- " claration of the charges against him, and was told " that the charges against him were : — "That he, your Memorialist, had entered into a " combination with six or seven others to seize Cap- ' tain Sears as he was passing through the county of "West Chester, and convey him on board a man-of- '■ war. " That your Memorialist had signed a Protest at the ' White Plains, in the county of West Chester, "against the proceedings of the Continental Con- " gress. "That your Memorialist had neglected to oi)en his " church on the day of the Continental Fast. ''And that he had written pamphlets and nt-ws- " papers against the liberties of America. "To the first and hist of these charges your "Memorialist pleads not guilty, and will be ready to "vindicate his innocence, as soon as he shall be "restored to his liberty in that province to which only " he conceives himself to be amenable.'- He considers 1 Vide pages 308, 309, ante. 2 In our early niaiiliood, after a careful exainiuation of uU the evidence •24 "it a high infringement of the liberty for which the " virtuous sons of America are now nobly struggling, " to be carried by force out of one colony into "another, for the sake eitlier of trial or imprison- which was acceBsible to us, we reached the conclusions that the celebra- ted political tracts of "A. W. Farmer" [n Westchefter Farmer] which were published in 1774, aud which created such an intense excitement among the revolutionary faction, were written by Isaac Wilkins, of Westchester, and not by the Rev. Samuel Seabury, also of Westchester, to whom they liad been generally attributed. Several years afterwards, those conclusions secured the respect and deference of one whose respect and deference, in such matters, were distinctions of which any one might have been reasonably proud, {Historical Magazine, New Series, iii., 9 — January, 18G8 ; ) and we have not since seen the slightest reason for revising our early judgment, in that much canvassed question of authorship. Within a few months after the publication of those notable political essays, the satirist, John Trumbull, wrote his versified version of Gen- eral Gage's ProcIanuUinn of the twelfth of .lune, 1775, in which, in the following lines, the well-informed author of that well-written piece very clearly indicated the person who, at that early date, was recognized as the detested "A. W. Farmer : " " What disappointments sad and bilkings, "Awaited poor departing W s; " What wild confusion, rout and hobble, you " Made with his farmer, Don A. W." (Trumbull's Origin of MoVimjul, 31, 32 ;) and within six months after Trumbull's publication, Samuel Seabury, in that portion of his Memorial to the Ocnei^al Anst'iitblt/ of Coiutectivut which is now under notice, added his very clear, very precise, and very unequivocal testimony, on the same interesting question. With these two independent pieces of evidence before him, the reader may easily ascertain with how much of accuracy that early judgment was formed. We are not unacquainted, also, with a paper, entitled The Westchester Farmer, written by D. Williams, and published in The Magazine of Afner- lean Histi>rij, viii., 117— February, 1882. It contains what purports to have been an unsigned draft of a Memorial supposed to have been addressed, or intended to have been addressed, by Samuel Seabury, sev- eral years after the occurrences now under consideration, to the Cummis- sioners fcr atijusting the losses of the Loyal llefugees, in which draft of a Memorial he claimed, if the paper is not something else than what it purports to have been, to have been the sole author of the "A. W. "Farmer" tracts, as well as of various other tracts and publications. But we are constrained to say that, whether the paper is what it purports to have been or not, and whether it was copied and delivered to the Commissioners or not, of both of which we have grave doubts, there are evidences within itself of its entire untrustworthiness, in its recital of known facts ; that we do not believe, therefore, that it was written by Samuel Seabury, carefully and deliberately, if he really wrote it ; and that we need more evidence than we have yet seen, that he was capable of deliberately and understandingly telling or writing unqualified false- hoods, for any purpose, either while he was in New Haven, in 1775-6, or in Lond n, after he had received his Doctor's degree from Oxford Uni- versity, several yeare afterwards. In view of the fact, if it is a fact, which Mr. Williams has copied from Boucher's Sermons, that a pension was granted to some other person for having done what, in this paper, was Siiid to have been done by .Seabury, it is very evident the British Government preferred to believe that Sam- uel Seabury was not the author of the " A. W. Farmer " tracts nor of the other publications named in that draft of a Memorial, referred to in Mr. William's paper ; and that it acted, accordingly. We are not insensible of the fact that a great-grandson of Samuel Sea- bury, in a paper which was published in The American Quarterly Church Review, for April, 1881, without any supporting testimony which any Bench in the country would have received as evidence, in any case, un- dertook the ungracious tiisk of showing, by argument, that Samuel Sea- bury was not sincere, when he wrote the disclaimer which is now under notice ; that his words, on the matter of his alleged authorship of the political pamphlets and newspaper articles referred to, were artfully in- tended to mislead the General .\ssembly, beneficially to himself; and that, in fact, notwithstanding what he and others had said and written to the contrary, Samuel Seabury was really the author of the "A. W. " Farmer " tracts ! We must be excused, however, for dissenting from the conclusions of this younger member of the Seabury family, and for 314 HISTOKY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " ment. Must he be judged by the laws of Connecti- " cut, to which as an inhabitant of New York he " owed no obedience ? or by the laws of that colony "in which he has been near twenty years a resident? " or, if the regulations of Congress be attended to, " must he be dragged from the committee of his own " county, and Irom the Congress of his own province, " cut off from the intercourse of his friends, deprived " of the benefit of those evidences which may be " necessary for the vindication of his innocence, and "judged by strangers to him, to his character, and " to the circumstances of his general conduct in life? "One great grievance justly complained of by the " people of America, and which they are now strug- " gling against, is the Act of Parliament directing " persons to be carried from America to England for " a trial. And your Memorialist is confident that the "supreme legislative authority in this colony will not "permit him to be treated in a manner so destructive " to that liberty for which they are now contending. " If your Memorialist is to be dealt with according to " law, he conceives that the laws of Connecticut, as "well as of New York, forbid the imprisonment of " bis person any otherwise than according to law. If " he is to be judged according to the regulations of the "Congress, they have ordained the Provincial Con- "gress of New York or the Committee of the county " of West Chester, to be his judges. Neither the "laws of either colony nor the regulations of the " Congress give any countenance to the mode of " treatment which he has met with. But considered " in either light, he conceives it must appear unjmf, " cruel, arbitrary, and tyrannical} retainiog our own well-considered opinion that Samuel Seabury was nothing else tlian a learned, sincere, trutliful, honorable, and fearless man, incapable of such dishonorable trickery as has been attributed to him. others are at liberty, of course, to think differently. 1 The reader of the two preceding paragrajjhs, in which the captive re- sponded to the first and fourth of tlie charges which his cajilors had pre- sented against liim, cannot fail to find evidence, of the higliest character, that, in his political opinions, Samuel Seabury was, at that time, as he had previously been, in exact accord with Isaac Wilkins and Frederic Philipso, also of W'estchester-county ; and that he was and had been in accord with the great body of Americans, believing and maintaining that the Home Government had invaded the personal and political rights of the Colonists ; that the latter had just reason for complaints and opposi- tion to the Colonial and Tlome Governments, because of those grievances ; that the Colonists were justified in their opposition to those obnoxious measures and to those who enacted and promoted the execution of them, as far as that opposition involved no violation ot the Rights of Persons or Properties nor of the Laws of the Land ; and that the Continental Congress of 1774, until it pasised beyond the prescribed limits of its authority, as that authority had been specifically defined by its constitu- ent Colonies, and until it assumed the unwarranted authority of legisla- tion, thereby closing the open door of reconciliation with the Mother Country, for the [iromotion of which it had been expressly and solely con- stituted, was worthy of the respect and supi)oit which were given to it, by nearly every one, in the Colony. In common with the great body of the Colonists, throughout the entire seaboard, he was sincere in his con- victions that the Colonies were suffering from the wrongs which had been inflicted on them by the Mother Country ; and he was willing to resort to all lawful means for their relief. But when the entire ma- chinery of the party of the Opposition was seized by those who only cared for the offices which they could secure and for the promotion of only a factional struggle for tlie control of the political power of the Colony, he i>referred to remain among the conservatives, and to act, if "With regard to the second charge, viz. : That "your Memorialist signed a Protest against the pro- "ceedings of the Congress, he begs leave to state the " fact as it really is. The General Assembly of the "province of New York, in their sessions last winter, "determined to send a petition to the king, a " memorial to the House of Lords, and a remonstrance "to the House of Commons, upon the subject of " American grievances ; ^ and the members of the " house, at least many of them, as your Memorialist " was informed, recommended it to their constituents " to be quiet till the issue of those applications should "be known. Some time in the beginning of April, as "your Memorialist thinks, the people were invited to " meet at the White Plains to choose delegates for a "Provincial Congress. Many people there assembled "were averse from the measure. They, however, gave " no other opposition to the choice of delegates than " signing a Protest. This Protest your Memorialist "signed in company with two members of the assem- " bly, and above three hundred other people.' Your " Memorialist had not a thought of acting against the " liberties of America. He did not conceive it to be "a crime to support the measures of the representa- "tivcs of the people, measures which he then hoped "and eypected would have good effect by inducing a " change of conduct in regard to America. More "than eight months have now passed since your "Memorialist signed the Protest. If his crime was "of so atrocious a kind, why was he suffered to "remain so long unpunished? or why should he be " now singled out from more than three hundred, to "endure the unexampled punishment of captivity " and unlimited confinement? " The other crime alleged against your Memorialist is " that he neglected to open his church on the day of the " Continental Fast. To this he begs leave to answer : "That he had no notice of the day appointed but " from common report : That he reci ived no order " relative to said day either from any Congress or " committee: That he cannot think himself guilty of " neglecting or disobeying an order of Congress, " which order was never signified to him in any way : he acted in any political movement, with the conservative rather than with the revolutionary faction of the party of the Opposition. Whatever he may have subsequently become, and the persecutions to which he was subjected by those of the opposite faction of the Opposi- tion would have soured the most amiable of dispositions and have trans- foimed those who were more opposed to the Government than he into active " friends of the Governmeut," when this ilemnrial was written, and previously thereto, Samuel Seabury, like Isaac Wilkins and Frederic Philipse and the De Lauceys and the great body of the farmers of West- chester-county and those who were not seekers for offices and official power and official emoluments, everywhere, as far as they were po'iti- cally inclined, in any direction, were unchanged, conservative membeis of the earlier party of the Opposition to the existing, governing Jlinistry, without either pretending to be or being, in the slightest degree, what were then known, distinctively, as "friends of the Government," orwbut have subsequently become known by the technical term, as offensive .as it was distinctive, of "Tories." 2 Vide pages 231, 232, ante. 3 Vide pages 247, 250, ante. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 315 " That a complaint was exhibited against your " Memorialist to the Provincial Congress of New " York, by Captain Sears, soon after the neglect with " which he is charged, and that after the matter was " Fully debated, the complaint was dismissed: ' That " he conceives it to be cruel, arbitranj, and in the " highest degree uiijiisf, after his supposed oflense has " been examined before the proper tribunal, to be " dragged like a felon seventy miles from home, and " again impeached of the same crime. At this rate " of proceeding, should he be acquitted at New " Haven, he may forced seventy miles farther, " and so on without end. " Further your Memorialist begs leave to repre- "sent: That he has a wife and six children, to " whom he owes, both from duty and affection, pro- " tection, support, and instruction. That his family " in a great measure depend, under the providence of " God, upon his daily care for their daily bread. " That there are several families at West Chester " who depend on his advice as a physician, to which " profession he was bred. That as a clergyman he " has the care of the towns of East and West Chester. " That there is not now a clergyman of any denom- " iuation nearer than nine miles from the place of " his residence, and but one within that distance " without crossing the Sound ; so that in his absence " there is none to officiate to the people in any " religious service, to visit the sick, or bury the dead. '' Your Memorialist also begs leave to observe : " That in order to discharge some debts which the " necessity of his afl'airs formerly obliged him to con- " tract, he, about a year ago, opened a grammar " school,^ and succeeded so far as to make it worth " one hundred pounds, York money, for the year " past. That he was in a fair way of satisfying his " creditors and freeing himself from a heavy incum- " brance. That he had five young gentlemen from " the Island of Jamaica, one from Montreal, four " children of gentlemen now in England, committed " to his care, among others from New York and the " country. That he apprehends his school to be " broken up and his scholars dispersed, probably " some of them placed at other schools, and that it " may be difhcult, if not impracticable, again to " recover them. That if there should be no other " impediment, yet if the people of West Chester are to 'Tlie nifflanly leader of the banditti who seized Samuel Seabury and destroyed or carried away the property of James Rivington, had had a public controveniy with the latter, and had been most ignoniiniously defeated, (deLancey's A'b(« on Jones's Uisti>rij of S'ew York during the litrohaionary War, i., 561-568.) The te.xt of the Memorial of Samuel Seaburii, in this place, indicated that the same disreputable habitue of Jasper Drake's Bceknian's Slip unlicensed alehouse had also had a political tilt with the Rector of St. Peter's Church, in Westchester, with a similar result. The reader may gather from those facts, without re- sorting to that general fact of the disappointment of Sears, in his scram- ble for "a high office in the American Navy," of which Bancroft has made mention, just what was the rejison that that i-ufflan was so zealous, in his pursuit of the two who had so signally defeated him. : Vide pages 304, :)06, ante. " be liable to such treatment as your Memorialist hath " lately endured, no person will be willing to trust " his children there. That in this case, your Memor- " ialist must lie entirely at the mercy of his creditors " to secure him from a jail, or must part with every- " thing he has to satisfy their just demands. " Your Memorialist, thinking it his duty to use all "lawful and honorable means to free himself from " his present confinement, mentioned his case to the "judges of the superior court lately sitting in this " town. Those honorable gentlemen thought it a " case not proper for them to interfere in ; he has, " therefore, no remedy, but in the interposition of the " Honorable House of Assembly. " To them he looks for relief from the heavy hand " of oppression and tyranny. He hopes and expects " that they will dismiss him from his confinement, " and grant him their protection, while he passes " peaceably through the colony. He is indeed " accused of breaking the rules of the Continental " Congress. He thinks he can give a good account " of his conduct, such as would satisfj' reasonable " and candid men. He is certain that nothing can " be laid to his charge so repugnant to the regula- " tions of the Congress, as the conduct of those " people who in an arbitrary and hostile manner " forced him from his house, and have kept him now "four weeks a prisoner without any means or pros - " pect of relief. He has a higher opinion of the " candor, justice, and equity of the Honorable House " of Assembly, and shall they incline to inquire more " minutely into the affair, he would be glad to ap- " pear at the bar of their house, and answer for him- "self; or to be permitted to have counsel to answer' " for him ; or, in such way as they in their wisdom "shall think best, to grant him relief. And your " Memorialist, as in duty bound, shall ever pray. " Samuel Seabuky. " Dated in New Haven the 20th day of Decem- "ber, 1775." Three days after this spirited Memorial was written — there is no record that it was ever laid before a General Assembly ' — as the brave Memorialist subse- 3 We are not insensible of the fact that Hiuman, in his Historical Col- lections of the part svMaiiied bif Omnecticut daring the War of the Hevoluti/m, {page 548,) stated that Samuel Seabury " brought his petition on the "20th day of December, 1776,* to the General .Xssembly of Connecticut, " then sitting at New Haven ; " and, further, {page 551,) that " the peti- "tion, in the Assembly, was referred to a Joint Committee of the two " Houses, with William Samuel Johnson, Esq., as Chairman, who re- " ported that a letter had been received from the President of the New " York Congress, on the subject ; and that to answer said letter, a pub- " lie hearing should be had before both Houses of said .\ssembly." We arc not insensible, also, that Mr. Seabury addressed his Memnriul " To '•the Honorable the General Assembly * » * now sitting in New " Haven, in said Colony, by special Order of his Honor, the Governor," {ride page 312. ante.) But the Journal of that Special Session, called by the Governor, and sitting at New Haven, shows " the General iVssembly " was adjourned by Proclamation, on the 14th day of December, 1775 ; " and that there was no other Session of the .\ssembly, from the latter * Thus stated in that work. 316 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. quently stated, "the gang who took" [hini] "pris- '■ oner thought proper to withdraw their guard and "let" [Jiim'] "return" to his desolated home.' It was not pretended that either the Executive, or the Legislative, or the Judicial authorities of the Colony of Connecticut, none of whom had heen disturbed by the revolutionary element within that Colony and all of whom were enabled to discharge all their legitimate functions, had made the slightest move- ment for the relief or for the release of the captive, who, during the preceding nearly five weeks, had been held in captivity, with the entire knowledge and acquiescence and in the presence of each of those several departments of the Colonial Government, in one of the Capital-Towns of the Colony. It was not pretended that any one of the seventeen banditti, residents of the Town of New Haven and known to all in authority, had been called to account, by any one in authority, for their flagrant violation of the Law of the land. On the contrary, it is evident that his captors had become tired, since they found that an able and courageous prisoner, such as Samuel Seabury was, was not likely to be useful to either the general cause of the Rebellion or to those who held him ; and, therefore, without any oificial action which has been recorded, either by the oflScial pens or by the traditional stylus of history — ^just as • similar political prisoners, within the memory of living men, have been informally and unceremoniously ejected from places in which they had been lawlessly con- fined by warrant of no other mittimus than the naked ipse dixit of reckless and law-defying political dema- gogues possessing a revolutionary power to issue such orders — the guards which had barred the outlet from his improvised prison were removed; the doors were opened ; and he was permitted to depart, without hindrance, and to return, without molestativ>n, to his home and family. He reached Westchester, on his return, on the sec- ond of January, 1776 but his private affairs were very much disturbed; ^ his School, on which he large- ly depended for the payment of his debts and for the more comfortable support of his family, was broken up ; ■* his present means were very limited — the ex- pense of his month's confinement, in the hands of the banditti, had amounted to the very large sum of ten pounds sterling^ — his papers were so much scattered date until the second T.hursday of the following May, see the same Historical Collections^ etc., 200. 1 Rev. Samuel Seubury to the Secretary of the Venerable Society, " New " York, December 29, 1776." 2 Rev. Samuel Seabury to the Venerable Society, " Wkstciiester, Janu- "ary 13, 1776 ; " Beardsley's Life and Correspondence of lit. Rev. Samuel, Seabury, D.D., 43. 3 Rev. Samuel Seabury to the Venerable Society, " Westchester, Janu- " ary 13, 1776.'' * Beardsley'e Life and Correspondence of Rt. Rev. Samuel Seabury, D.D., 48. 6 Rev. Samuel Seabury to the Venerable Society, " Westchester, January " 13, 1776." that he was unable to discharge his official duties with propriety and accuracy ; * he and his family were subjected to constant annoyances and insults ; ' nis house was occupied, soon after, by a Company of Cavalry, who consumed or destroyed all the products of his Glebe, on which, to a considerable extent, his family was made dependent ; " he was thus made en- tirely dependent for support on his small stipend as a Missionary of the Venerable Society ; and, finally, like his friend and neighbor, Isaac Wilkins, he was compelled to seek shelter and safety in flight '—when a favorable opportunity was afforded, he gathered such of his effects as could be conveniently carried, and, with his wife and six children, he fled, first across the Sound, to Long Island and, subsequently, to the City of New York.^" Need there be any surprise that, after such an ex- perience of what, in practice, were " the Liberties of "America," Samuel Seabui-y's political opinions under- went a radical change — that he ceased to be of the party of the Opposition to the Ministry then in place ; and that he became, decidedly and firmly, " a friend " of the Government," in other words, an unqualified and distinctive Tory? " On the fourth of December, 1775, also during the period between the dissolution of the first and the organization of the second of the series of the Pro- vincial Congresses, the Governor of the Colony, Wil- liam Tryon, from his shelter, on board the ship Dutchess of Gordon, lying in the harbor of the City of New York, evidently and reasonably encouraged by the backwardness of the Deputies to the Provin- cial Congress ; by the known inclination to peace, of a large majority, if not of nearly all, the Colonists; and by the countenance and expected support of sundry of the leaders of the Rebellion, addressed a letter to the Mayor of that City, Whitehead Hicks,'^ Ibid. ' Rev. Samttel Seabury to the Venerable Society, " New York, December " 29, 177G." 8 Beardsley's Life and Correspondence of Rt. Rev. Samuel Seabury, D.D., 48. o Samuel Seabury's name was on the first " List of Westchester-county "Tories," {Historical Manuscripts, etc.: Miscelluneous Papers, xxxiv., 193 ) In September, 1776, after reciting the disaffection of Kev. Sanmel Seabury, the Committee of Safety, five of the Westchester-county mem- bers being present, directed Colonel Joseph Drake, forthwith, to remove him from his home to the house of Colonel John Brinckerhoflf, at Fish- kill, to remain there till the further order of the Convention or the Com- mittee of Safety ; and that he be not permitted to leave the farm of the said Colonel Brinckerhoff, except in company with the Colonel. At the same time Colonel Van Cortlandt, John Jay, and Robert Harper were directed to ascertain what property Mr. Seabury had which might be seized and sold forthe payment for his board and lodging, in his involun- tary exile, (.Journal of the Committee of Safety, " Die Mercurii, 9 ho., " A.M., September 11, 1776.") 1» Beardsley's Life and Correspondence of Rt. Rev. Samuel Seabury, D.D., 50. 11 Beardsley's Life and Correspondence of the Rt. Rev. Samuel Sea^ bury, D.D., 48-50. 12 Governor Tryon to the Mayor of the City of New York, "Ship Dutch- " ESS OF GoRUON, New York Harbour, 4th Dec. 1775." This letter appeared, in print, in Gainc's New-York Gazette : and the Weekly Mercury, No. 1261, New-York, Monday, December 11, 1775. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 317 enclosed in which was another letter addressed "To " theIxhabitantsof theColony ofNew York.'" expressive of his hope that some measure might be adopted as the basis of an accommodation between the Mother Country and the Colony. It was w ritten in a spirit of kindness and regard for the welfare of the country, probably as a feeler, and certainly after con- sultation with some of the leaders of the Eebellion ; and it was well-calculated to lead the revolutionary portions of the Colonists back to their duty and to peace, in which it appears to have been quite effec- tive — '' several of the Delegates " [m ihe Provincial Congress'] "were favorably disposed," we are told; and there can be little doubt that by far the greater number of the Colonists, also, could their well-con- sidered and honest preferences have been safely ex- pressed, would have heartily concurred in the propo- sition. It was not, then, generally known, but the revela- tions made by the publication of the records of that period have recently shown, that that letter was in- troductory to a movement toward a peaceful solution of the political troubles of the Colonies, which, if the letter should be well-received, the very able family of Smith, who had been among the originators and most earnest promoters of the Rebellion, and whose duplicity and hypocrisy are well known, was prepar- ing to direct and lead. Thoniiis Smith, one of the brothers, was a member of the Provincial Congress, and, of course, in all the councils of the party of the Rebellion, enjoying the confidence of those who were 1 The following is a copy of that letter, taken from the Sew-York Colonial ManuscripUi, ci., 123, in the Office of the Secretary of State, at Albany : " To THE Inhabitants of the Colony of New Youk : " I take tliis public Manner to signify to tlie Inliabitants of this Prov- " iuce, that his Majesty lias been graciously pleased to grant me his " Royal Permission to withilraw from the Government ; and at the siinie " Time to assure them of my Keadiness to perform ever Service in my " Power, to promote the common Felicity. If I am excluded from " every Hope of being any Ways instrumental towards the Re-establish- " ment of that Harmony, at present interrupted between Great Britain " and her Colonies, I expect soon to be obliged to avail myself of his " Majesty's Indulgence. " It has given me great Pain to view the Colony committed to my " care, in such a turbulent State as not to have afforded me since niy *' Arrival, any Prospect of being able to take the dispassionate and " deliberate Sense of its Inhabitants, in a constitutional Manner, upon " the Resolution of Parliament for composing the present Ferments in " the Provinces ; A Resolution that was intended for the Basis of an " Accommodation ; and if candidly considered in a Way in which it will " be most probably successful, and treated with that Delicacy and ." Decency requisite to the Cultivation of a sincere Reconciliation and " Friendship, might yet be improved for the I'urjiose of restoring the " geneml Tranquility and Security of the Empire. " I owe it to my .\ffection to this Colony, to declare my wish, that " some Jleasure may be speedily adopted for Ibis purpose ; as I feel an " extreme Degree of Anxiety, in being Witness to the growing Calamities " of this Country, without the Power to alleviate them: Calamities " that must increase, while so many of the Inhabitants withhold their " Allegiance from their Sovereign, and their Obedience to the Patent " Countr)' ; by whose Power and Patronage they have hitherto been sus- " tained and protected. " William Tryon. " Ship Di'tchess of Gordon, " Harbour or Nkw York, 4th Dec. 1775." concerned in them. Joshua Hett Smith, another of the brothers, whose unholy associations with General Benedict Arnold and Major John Andre, at a later period, are well known, was not, then, in any Com- mittee or Congress ; but, nevertheless, he was, at that time, one of the leaders of the Rebellion, out-doors, and was admitted to the inner councils of those who were its leaders. William Smith, the elder of the historical family of that period and allied to the Liv- ingstons, by marriage, was the most influential of all those who were, at that time, engaged in the political affairs of the Colony. He had been associated with William Livingston and John Morin Scott, in the historically famous "triumvirate." He had professed to approve the usurpations of legislative authority and other questionable doings of the Continental Con- gress of 1774 ; and he is known to have been an outside adviser of the factious minority of the General Assem- bly, with whom and with whose inconsistency of action the reader is already accjuainted. He was the life-long and confidential friend and the frequent host of Gene- ral Philip Schuyler ; and the correspondent, friend, and political adviser of George Clinton. He gave up his house, for the occupation of General Washington, when the latter occupied the City; and, with much ostentation, he appeared to be largely in sympathy with those, in New York and elsewhere, who were in the Rebellion. But, notwithstanding all these, Wil- liam Smith adroitly avoided the placing of his name to the General Association of the Congress of 1774, that act which was made the political shibboleth, after the catchwords of " Rights " and "Liberty" had ac- complished their purposes and anew issue, that of an implicit obedience to the powers which were, had been made by those who were leaders in the Rebel- lion. He was, also, at the same time that he was thus masquerading as a confidante and an adviser of those who were leading the Rebellion and as a sympathiser with and promoter of the Rcbeiyon itself, a Member of the Colonial Council of the King; an intimate friend and confidential adviser of the Governor of the Col- ony, William Tryou — whose leanings toward the pre- tensions of the Livingston family were as distinctly seen as were those of the venerable Lieutenant-gover- nor, Cadwallader Colden, toward the pretensions of the more influential Dc Lancey family — and a secret schemer, aiming to promote the interest of his own family by disarming the Rebellion of its strength'^ and, thereby, effecting a reconciliation with the Home Government. ******** As far back as the eighth of June or eighth of July, a Report had been made by a Committee which had been previously appointed to consider the subject, provid- 2 The strength of the Rebellion was in the union of all the disaf- fected Colonies ; and, had he succeeded in withdrawing JJew York from the existing confederation, which he and all the Smiths endeav- ored to do, that strength would have been impaired, and, possibly, the confederation of tlie Colonies effectually broken. 318 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. ing " for the dissolution of this Congress and election "of a new Provincial Congress for this Colony;"^ but, very probably, nothing w^S really done and deter- mined on, concerning the subjects referred to. There was some action, in the Provincial Congress, on collateral subjects; but it was not until a much later period that that body was dissolved — on the fourth of November, either because of the absence of a quorum or for some other reason, no record of a formal adjournment having been made, the Provincial Congress ceased to exist; and the works which it had done as well as its own existence, became matters of history. Sooner or later. History will assign each to the place to which it is justly entitled. It has been stated that, as the out-come of the various labors of that body, on that subject, an Ordin- ance had been adopted by the Provincial Congress, on the twenty-seventh of October, providing for the Election of new Delegations to a new Provincial Con- gress, on the seventh of November, and for the as- sembling of that new Provincial Congress, on the fourteenth of that month; but there is no record of any such action, on the official Journal of that body ; and no copy of that Ordinance has been found, not- withstanding the most diligent search and inquiry have been made. Whatever may have been the form and character of the document, it is evident, however, that such an Ordinance was really adopted and promulgated, and that, agreeably to its provisions, on the seventh of November, a meeting was held at the White Plains, for the election of Delegates from the County of Westchester, to the coming Congress.^ It is not stated in what manner nor by whom the elec- tion was made ; but it is stated that Colonel Lewis 1 In tliu JfHtnml of the Provincial Congrem, of the sixtecutli of October, it is said the Report was nuido "on tlie oiglitli of July \ast ;" in the Journal of that body, of tlie eighteenth of October, it is said the Report was made ** on the eiglith of Jmw Uist ; " and in a memorandum ap- pended to the Jminml of that body, of tiie nineteentli of October, stating that the Report was "wante€," it is said, also, that it was "of the 8th June last.'' In the Jmirnal of tke Proetnciat f^ontjrf'ns, of neither of those days, liowever, does there appear the slightest mention of any such Repoi't or of the subject of it. - MinuU's of Proet'cdings during the rcceJW of Oie Provincial Congress, by their Atljmtrninent on the fourth of November, 1775. ^The following document, copied from the original manuscript, (Hts- lorical Manuscripts, etc. : Credentials of delegates, xxiv., 24, G7,) illustrates this subject : "To THE HONOIl.iBLE THE PKOVINCUL CoNGRE!!S OF THE CoLONY OF "New York. " We the Committee for the County of Westchester do humbly certify " that at the Election of delegates to represent the said Cimnty in the " Next Provincial Congress to be held at New York the 14"> instant, " which was this day held at the Court House of the said County, Colonel Lewis Ortihuin, Stephen Ward, I^aq., Co]. Josei)k Drake, Robert Graham, " Esq., John Thomas, Jun' Esq., Mr. William Puu-tiiig, Major Ebenezer " Lockwood, Col. Pierre Van Cortlandt, and Col. Gilbert Drake, were duly " elected agreeable to the resolves of the Provincial Congress, to repre- " sent this county until the Second Tuesday of May next ; and that it " w;is voted by the people that any three of the said Deputies shall act "for this county. Dated the 7th day of November, 1775. " By order of the Committee, "Gilbert H. Dh.\ke, Chairman. "A true copy from the minutes taken by I " MlClH Tow.N'SEND, Clerk of the Committee." I Graham, Stephen Ward, Esq., Colonel Joseph Drake, Robert Graham, Esq., John Thomas, Junior, Esq., William Paulding, Major Ebenezer Lockwood, Col- ond Pierre Van Cortlandt, and Colonel Gilbert Drake * were elected ; and that any three of these should have authority to represent Westchester-coun- ty in the coming Provincial Congress — Gouverneur Morris, James Van Cortlandt, Philip Van Cortlandt, James Holmes, and David Dayton, all of whom had been members of the preceding Congress having been dropped, and Major Ebenezer Lockwood and Col- onels Pierre Van Cortlandt and Gilbert Drake sent in their stead. The day appointed for the organization of the new Provincial Congress was the fourteenth of November; but, on that day, there was not even a respectable minority of the Delegates present, which may well be considered as indicative of the coolnes-* with which the Rebellion was regarded by the great body of the Col- onists, in New York, even at that early period; and of how little warrant there had been, in fact, for the outrages which had been committed by the preceding Congress and by its Committees, in their name. Day by day, the handful of punctual Delegates met and adjourned. They amused themselves by dic- tating letters to the Committees of the faltering Counties, urging the attendance of their several Dele- gations, " in order that the business of the great cause " we are engaged in may be no longer delayed or " neglected." * Threats were made, in some in- stances, that " the Continental Congress'' might " find " it necessary, for the public service and for the want of "a Congress, to put the Colony under a Military " Government, directed by a Major-General and an " Army, and that at the sole expense of this Colony," adding that " many Gentlemen present are apprehen- " sive " that such " would be the consequence if a Con- "gress [were] not speedily formed, so as to proceed to "business," etc.* On the first of December, tlieCommit- tee of Orange-county was asked — the second request of the kind — "that you will not delay sending down your "members by next Monday morning, that the public " business may no longer suffer for the want of a repre- " sentation of your County; for such is the perilous ," state of America, and this Colony in particular, that * It will be seen that eight of the nine Delegates thus elected carried titles with their names— the terms "Esq." and "Mr." at that time, having recognized places in the order of rank— and that only one of the nine, William Paulding, was low enough, in the social rank, to be a plain, untitled man. s These words, taken from the letter sent to the Delegates-elect of Kings-county, on the twenty-second of November, represent the sub- stance of those sent to (he Committee of Orange-county, on the follow- ing day : to the Delegates from Richmond-county in the preceding Con- gress, on the twenty-fourth of November ; and to the Delegates-elect and to the Committees in the several Counties of Tryon, Charlotte, Cum- berland, Orange, Kings, and Duchess on the first of December. {Minutes of the Proceedings during the Hecess of the Provincial Congress, by their Adjournment on the fourth of November, 1775.) 6 These were sent, on the first of December, to the Committees of Tryon, Charlotte, and Cumberland-counties, respectively. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 319 " a Convention of the Deputies is absolutely necessary, " with the utmost despatch."' To these pressing words, the following threat was appended: "But if, after " such repeated applications to your County, to be in " Congress, by their Deputies, if you continue to ne- " gleet a meiisure so necessary for your reputation and "safety, you must not complain if the Congress de- " termine upon matters relative to your County, in " common with others, although yours should, by " your inattention, be unrepresented."' Richmond- county was not inclined to send a Delegation ; and was, first, coaxed to elect a Delegation, and, finally, threatened.' How much more, which was not re- corded, that handful of the leaders of the Rebellion, in Colonial New York, said and did, for the intimida- tion of those who were less zealous, in that cause, is not now known ; but the careful reader will not fail to inquire, without obtaining an answer, why the Home Government failed, during that long interval of hesitation and of doubt among the greater number of the Colonists, to strengthen the Colonial Govern- ment in the maintenance of order and obedience to the Laws ; why those who were not inclined to rebel- lion were not protected in the quiet possession of their properties and in the peaceful pursuit of their respective vocations ; and why the price which would have obtained the marketable leaders of the Rebellion, for the use of the Home Government, wiis not paid, as the smaller and more effective investment,* or, if 1 teller to the Committee of Orange-couiily, " New-Tobk, December let, "1775." ^ Letter from Paul Micheaa to Robert Benson, " Richmond-coixtv, Do- "cembcrlst, 1775." 3 "The evil couscquuncea tliat will attend the not having a Provincial "Congress to determine on the measures necessiiry to be adopted and "carried into execution, at this unhappy crisis, are more easily con- "ceivedthan e.xpressed ; and rest assured, Geullemen, that the neigh "bouring I'olouies will not remain inactive spectators, if you show a " disposition to depart from the Continental I'uiou. Confusion and dis- " order, w ith numberless other evils, you must suppose, will atteud the " want of a Congress for the goverunient of this Colony, until a recon- "ciliation with the Mother Country can be obtained," (Letter to the (^mmillee of Uklimimd-couiilij, " Xkw-Yokk, 2d Dec. 1775.") * It is very well known that the Jlorrises were zealous loyalists, in Europe as well as in .\merica, until the family lost its hold on the Colo- nial Government, by the removal of the elder Lewis, from the office of Chief Justice of the Colony. The appointment of Thonuis Hutchinson to the Bench, to which James Otis, the elder, aspired, transferred the weight and influence of the Otis family from the side of the Government to the leadership of the Opposition, in Massachusetts. Israel Putnam was too highly appraised for the Royal shambles, and so remained in the market, until, on the demand of the Livingstons, he was placed where he could do no further harm. The greater success of Benjamiu Pratt, of Boston, and, subsequently, that of Daniel Ilorsmauden, in the race for the place of Chief Justice of the Colony of New York, when James De Lancey died, added fresh bitterness to the Morrises, in the disappoint- ment of Robert Uunter Morris ; and the disappointment of William Smith, on the same occasion, threw the Smiths into the front rank of the malcontents, in New York. Egbert Dumoud, of Ulster county, is 8;iid to have become informer of Congre-sional secrets to Governor Tryon, provisionally, with a hankering after the Shrievalty of Ulster-county, as James Duane had communicated the secrets of the Congress of 1774, to Lieutenant-governor Colden, undoubtedly for an equivalent, present or prospective. Who supjioses that Captain Gilbert Livingston, of Arnold's American Legion, and Robert G. Livingston, Junior, that Philip John Livingston, the Royal Sheriff of Duchess-couuty, and his brother, John the heroic treatment of the troubles was preferred, why those leaders were not arrested and punished, as other and less distinguished violators of the peace were wont to be punished, in America and elsewhere. On the first of December, competent Delegations appeared from the five Counties of New York, Al- bany, Westchester, Ulster, and Suffolk, with insuOi- cient Delegations from Kings and Duchess, and no portions of such Delegations from Richmond, Queens, Orange, Tryon, Cumberland, Gloucester, and Char- lotte-counties ; and, consistently with usage and the Rules of the preceding Congress, "the Representa- " fives of a majority of the Counties not being pres- " ent," those who were present " could not proceed to " business, as a Congress."* On the sixth of that month, competent Delegations appeared from the five Counties of New York, Albany, Westchester, Duchess, and Suffolk, with insufficient Delegations from Kings, Ulster, and Orange-counties, and no portions, of such Delegations from the Counties of Richmond, Queens, Tryon, Cumberland, Gloucester, or Charlotte ; at which time, directly in violation of the rulings, on the first of that month, they declared that " the " Deputies from a majority of the Counties appeared," — a falsehood, which, to have established its true character, needed only a reference to the Crfdeittluh which were filed, as their several authorizations, by the respective Delegations, — organized a Congress, and proceeded to the discharge of those duties to which they had respectively as.signed themselves.* There were five Delegations present, on the first of December, when it was declare.d that " the Represen- " tatives of a majority of the Counties not being pres- "ent," those who were present " could not proceed to "business, as a Congress:" five days afterwards, when no more than five such Delegations aj)peared, with an elasticity of conscience and of action which was worthy of those who were present, what had been declared, utidcr similar circjumstauces, at their former meeting, was entirely disregarded ; and what, at that former meeting, was said to have been insuflieicnt to have allowed the five Delegations who were then present, to proceed to business, as a Congress," was declared, in this later meeting, to be sufficient to permit five Delegations — four of the five having been of the former five — to do what the former five "could not" do: with the authorized Delegations of W. Livingston, Captjiin in Fanning's King's .\merican Regiment, were not the better exponcuts of the real opinions of that office-seeking family of Livingstons ; and who can doubt, with the roster of subsequent office holding Livingstons before him, that nmch of additional inHueuce, in favor of the Home Government, might have been secured from that family and its adherents, had that Government been as g- nerous in the disposition of offices to members of that peculiarly otfice-.seeking family, as the revolutionary authorities and the subsequent State Government, in New Y'ork, unquestionably « ere ? & Minutes of the Proceedings dtirintj the recess of the I'rorincial i 'imgrets, "New Y'okk, Friday, Dec. Ist, 1775." ^ Jouniat of the Provincial Congress, "Wednesday moining, December "Cth, 1775." 320 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. only five of the fourteen Counties then present, the Journal of the Provincial Congress bearing testimony to that fact, it will be seen and understood that the record which stated that " the Deputies from a ma- " jority of the Counties appeared," is a false record ; that there was, really, no quorum present, even under the rule and usage of that revolutionary body ; and that, tested by that rule and that usage, even from the convenient standpoint of rebellion, the Congress was not properly constituted and was without due revolutionary authority — of course, it possessed no other authority, in the slightest degree.^ What was thus called a Provincial Congress, elected Colonel Nathaniel Woodhull, of the County of Suf- folk, to be its President ; and John McKesson and Robert Benson, the Secretaries of the former Pro- vincial Congress, were elected Secretaries of that.^ It assembled, day by day, until the twenty-second of December, when it took a recess, leaving a Commit- tee of Safety to discharge some of the duties which it had undertaken to perform.^ That Committee, of which Colonel Pierre Van Cortlundt, of Westchester- county, was the Chairman, continued in session, until the twelfth of February, 1776, when the Pro- vincial Congress was again assembled ; * and that Congress continued in session, until the sixteenth of March, in that year, when it took another recess, leaving, as before, a Committee of Safety, to discharge some portions of its self-imposed duties, during its absence.* That Committee, of which Joseph Hal- lett, of the City of New York, was theChairnian, con- tinued in session, uutiUhe 8th of May, 1776, when the Provincial Congress was again assembled — it is writ- ten that " several matters of the utmost importance, 1 John Leflertse appeared in the Congress, nominally from Kings-coun- ty ; but he did uot pretend to offer a Cri;d<.-iitial, uor any other, even the slightest, evidence that lie had been appointed, by any one, to appear as a repiesenfative from Kings-county or in any other capacity, in the Provincial Congress or elsewhere. Peter Clowes wns said to have represented " Goshen Precinct in Orange- "county;" but the ('redentiuls which were filed from Orange-county de- clared that <«'" Delegates should bo required to represent that County; and that only when one such Delegate should appear in the Congress from "the North side of the Mountains" [(Ac Uighlundu] and one from the " South side " of those Highlands — Orange county, at that time, in- cluding what, now, is Rocklaud-county - should that Delegation be complete and authorized to represent the County. As there was only one, instead of two, Delegates ; and because those Towns which were below the Highlaruds were entirely without a representative, there was no Delegation from Orange-county, in the Congress. Thomas Palmer and Moses Caiitine w ere the only Delegates, out of the seven who had been elected, and who were piesent, to represent Ulster- county ; but those who had elected them and given to them all the au- thority which it was Siiid they possessed, had declared that three of those seven should be required to constitute a duly authorized Delegation from that County. The two, therefore, left Ulster-county without a competent Delegation. 2 JouriHil of the Provincial Cvngreat, " Wednesday morning, December "6th, 1775." ^Juuniiil of the Provincial CongrenK, "Die Veneris, 9 ho., A.M., Decera- "ber 2-2nd, 1775." ^ Jovriial of Ike Provincial Cuui/reim, "Die Ijunie, A.M., February 12th, " 1776." i Joumul of the Provincial Congress, "Die Sabbati, 9 ho., A.M., March "ICth, 177(!." " as well to the United Colonies, in general, as to this " Colony, in particular, rendering it necessary for a " speedy meeting of the Provincial Congress of this " Colony, the Committee of Safety, therefore, or- "dered Circular Letters to be sent to all the mem- "bers, requesting their attendance, in Provincial " Congress, at New York, on the first day of this inst. " May. On that day, and every day, since, many "members attended, but not a sufficient number to "make a Congress,^ until this afternoon" \_May 8, 1776,] ' when a quorum was found to be present, and the business was resumed and continued until the afternoon of the thirteenth of that month, when the Congress was dissolved.* During that short period of about six months, the progress of events, in America, was peculiarly re- markable. ******** The entire Colony, as far as Commerce, Trade, and the Mechanic Arts were concerned, was plunged into the greatest distress:' the seamen were idle, in the Ports, because there was an interdiction of Commerce with foreign Ports ; and commercial Non-inter- course prevailed : the Mechanics and Work- ing-men in the Cities — some of whom had been the ever-ready and noisy tools of the dema- gogues of faction, iu the earlier days of the dis- turbances — were suffering, unemployed : " to add to I That old story of the dilatoriness of the country members, even iu the face of the most pressing necessities and of the most urgent calls, cer- tainly confirm the reports that the great body of the Colonists, especially that of the country-people was lukewarm and indifferent, if they were not positively unfriendly, to the Rebellion. If the leaders among the disaffected, and surely no others were sent to the Provincial Congress, were astanly, in their attendance, even when the most urgent appeals for their attendance were sent, as these were, in the preceding December and in May, 177(i, how much more indifferent must those have been, who had other and legitimate demands on their time and attention, and by whom an office was neither looked for nor desired. T Journal of the Proviiwial Congress, "Die Mercurii, 4 ho., P.M., May "8th, 1776." ^Journal of the Provincial Congress, " Die Luna!, 3 ho., P.M., May 13, "1770." There is no record of a formal adjournment ; and it looks very much as if the end of this Congress was like its beginning, without a quorum. 9 r/ie Committee of Safety to General Schuyler, "In Committee of "Safetv, New York, 17th Jany., 1776," and General Schuyler's reply, "Albany, January 25, 1776 ;" Journal of the Committee of Safely, "4 ho., "P.M., Feb. 10,1776;" etc. 10 Tlte action of the Continental Congress of 1774, concerning the Com- merce of the Colonies, may be seen in the Association which it " recom- " mended." "We beg leave to hint, that in the present declension of Trade, the "seamen of this Port ought to be employed upon this article of service " [balteaux-jnen, for the Northern Army,] "as well as that of building "batteaux," (CommillA-e of Safely to General Schuyler, "In Committee of "Safetv, New-York, 17th Jany., 1776.") II "We W(juld beg leave to mention it as necessary to employ as many "of the Carpentere of this City, as possible" [in the construction of batteaux, for the Northern Army] " to prevent them and their families "from starving by means of tlie stagnation of business, which is more "severely felt in this City than in any other part of the Province," (The Committee of Safely to General Schuyler, "In Committee of "Safety, New- York, 17th Jany., 1776.") " I cm easily conceive that it is very difficult, at New York, for arti- " ficers to procure a subsistence for their families— the like difficulty "prevails here," (General Schuyler to the Committee of Ss to the City of New York, during 322 HISTOEY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. sometimes in the neighboring City; sometimes for the uses of distant communities, who sent there, for sup- plies; sometimes for the uses of the Armies, in the field ~ and, whenever an opportunity was afforded, to the men-of-war, in the harbor. The loCal Commit- tees, sometimes, consequentially assumed to interrupt their traffic ; ^ and the Committee of Safety, in order to prevent ''sundry persons from Connecticut" from purchasing, for the evident purpose of forestalling the market, "requested the Committee of the County " of Westchester to take effectual means to prevent " the sale and transportation of any barrelled Beef "or Pork out of Westchester-county, to any person or "persons residing out of this Colony, or for the use of " any person or persons residing out of this Colony, " until the further order of the Provincial Congress " or of the Committee of Safety of this Colony ; " but, nevertheless, the fertility of the County and the patient industry of the greater number of those who lived therein were known and utilized, throughout the entire seaboard. The same local terrorism which had prevailed, throughout the County, under the auspices of the former Provincial Congress, was continued, with the sanction of this;' numbers of the inhabitants of the County were seized, only on information secretly conveyed by unseen accusers, and cast into prison, without a hearing ; * and some of them were severely the period now under examination, prove, teyond a question, and apart from every other consideration, how short siglited the leaders of tlie Kebellion were, when, through the violence of their lawlessnesB, they impaired tlie productivenecis of so fruitful a source of supplies, both for the City and for their Armies. 1 See pages 320. post. - 2 Vide pages ;V2C, 327, post. 2 William Sutton, Estj., of Mamaroneck, appeared before the Congress, personally, and informed that body that he had been obliged, for fear of injuries, to leave his home ; and requested protection to return to his house, and to occupy it. lie is understood to have been the ten- ant occupying what is known as De Lancey's Neck, [Journal of the Provin- cial CongresSf *' Die Veneris, lU ho., A.M., Deer. 15, 1776 ; " Information received, persmtalhjj from Edward F. de Lancey, Esq. ^mi€ of the present own- ers of De Lanceifs Neck.) Thonuis Merritt was arrested and taken before the Committee of Safety, in the City of New York, "on information of persons from *' Westchester-county, that he had declared he had seen people casting " great quantities of Bullets, to kill the Whigs ; and that he knew "where great quantities of those Bullets were" — a trumped-up charge, which was so entirely transparent that, after his accusers and their wit- nesses had been examined by the Committee of Safety, whoso fondness of i}ersecutiou was known to all, Merritt was promptly discharged. These may serve as specimens of the whole numbt-r. < Benjamin Hunt and Oakley, of Eastchester, were arrested be- cause they had taken some Sheep, Pigs, and Poultry, to Brooklyn, said to have been for the Asia. W illiam Weynian was arrested for having assisted in taking some produce to the Asia. Dr. A/.or Belts, of , was arrested for violent words of denunciation, when the Con- gress arbitrarily broke down his business, as an inoculator for the Small- pox, and deprived him of the means of support for bis family. Godfrey Haines, Bartholomew Haines, Isaac Gedney, and Palmer, all of them of Eye or Mamaroneck, are already known to the reader, in the sad story of the Sloop PoUtj iiiid Aim, {page 295, ante ;) and .lamesaud William Lounsberry ; Isaac, John, and Joshua Gedney ; John Fowler ; Isaac and Peter Valentine ; Isaac, Joseph, and Joshua Purdy ; William Arm- strong ; William Sutton ; John Flood ; James, John, Thomas, and Wil- liam Haines ; and Joshua Burrell, besides several others, were ar- treated, while they were prisoners.* They were plundered of their Arms, again and again, some- times by Connecticut-men called in by the County Committee^ or by the brutal General Charles Lee,' and sometimes by orders from the Provincial Con- gress or its Committee of Safety ; * levies were made on her Militia, for the construction of the defen- sive works in the City of New York ; ' and two Companies of the new Regiments in the New- York Line of the Continental Army were assigned to be raised in Westchester-county.'" It is also note- worthy, as a portion of the history of that period, that Westchester-county afforded the first evidence of the alteration of a Provincial Bill of Credit — one of the last emission, for five dollars, having been altered so that it appeared to have been one of ten dollars." The opening of the new year — the exact date does not appear, if it was ever definitely known — witnessed a transaction by which the lower portion of the County of Westchester, especially the Towns of Mamaroneck, Eastchester, Westchester, and Yonkers, was greatly disturbed ; and yet it was an occurrence rested in connection with spiking of the Cannon, near Kingsbridge, of which more will be seen, hereafter, (pages 323, '.iji, poit.) Doctor Azor Belts, Godfrey Haines, William Lounsberry, Joshua Gedney, Joseph Purdy, Joshua Burrell, and Thomas Haines were among those who were manacled and otherwise treated with great inhumanity. »See pages 288, 289, 2U0, 299, ante. ' Colonel Samttel Drake to the Provincial Congress, "New-York, Feby. "16, 1776;" Journal of the Provincial Congress, "Die Veneris, 3 ho., "P.M., Feb. 16, 1776 ;" the same, "Die Sabbati, 10 ho., A.M., Feb. 17, "1776 ;" the same, " Die Veneris, 10 ho., A.M., Feby. 23, 1776." Colonel Waterbury, who accompanied General Lee, through West- chester-county, acknowledged his possession of thirty Guns, two pairs of Holsters, nine Cutlasses, aud three Pistols— how many more he bad seized, and retained or sent back into Connecticut, are uow unknown ; and no record was taken of the names of those who had been thus plunilcred. They must have been taken, however, on the line of march of his Regiment, between the Sawpitsand Kingsbridge; and there was not the slightest shadow of even revolutionary authority for the seizure, except the law of the stronger and that of thieves. 6 See pages 288, 297, 298, ante. 5 " Kesolved and Ohoeueu, That Colonel Joseph Drake and Colonel " Thomas Thomas, of Westchester-county, do draft out of their Regiments "two hundred men, in the following proportions, to wit; Two Compa- " nies of sixty-five Privates each, besides tlie Captains and other inferior " Officere, out of Colonel Joseph Drake's Regiment ; and one Company "of sixty-five Privates, with the Caj)tain and other inferior oflicers, in " Colonel Thomas's Regiment, and as many more men out of those two " Regimeuts as will turn out, volunteers for that service, to be innne- "diatelysent ti the City of New Y'ork, armed and accoutred in the "best manner possible, and to be joined to Colonel Samuel Drake's " Regiment," [of Westchester county Minute nu-u (pages 284, 285, ante) which was then in the City] "and to receive the same pay aud provisions as the "other Continental forces in this Colony." {Journal of the Provincial Congress, "Die Jovis, 4 ho., P.M., March 14, 1776.") Colonel Samuel Drake's Regiment, referred to in this Order, was the skeleton Regiment of We.stcbester-county Minute-men, which wa* then in the Continental Service, aud posted at Hoern's Hook, on the Island of Manhattan, at the mouth of the Harlem-river, and opposite to Hell-gate, where was one of the passes to Long Island. We have not found any record of the three Companies which were thus drawn from Westchester-county, if they were drawn. Journal of the Provinciid Congress, "Die Soils, 10 ho., A.M., Feb. 18, "1771-,." Journal of the Committee of Safety, " Die Veneris, A.M., April 19, "1776;" The Committee of Safetij to the ConimiUee of Weslchester-counlij, "In Committee of Safetv, New- York, April 19, 1776." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 177-4-1783. 323 which might have been certainly foreseen and easily prevented, had those who were immediately concerned in preventing it possessed the foresight and caution which are usually attributed to intelligent men. We have already noticed the fact that, at the be- ginning of the active revolutionary movements which followed the receipt of intelligence that General Gage had unwisely commenced active military operations in the field, many of the Cannon which belonged to private individuals, in the City of New York, were drawn to Kingsbridge ; ' and, subsequently, as the political feeling became more intense, every gun in the City, no matter how useless for any other purpose than for old metal it might have been, was ordered to the same place.^ It is not clear what good was expected to be de- rived from those movements of the guns ; but it is very clear that, before the close of the year 1775, be- tween three and four hundred Cannon, of all calibres, grades, and conditions — some of them good and ser- viceable ; others, less valuable and less useful ; the greater number, honeycombed and worthless, unless for old iron ; and all of them, unmounted and with- out carriages — were accumulated in three large gath- erings, one, of about fifty guns, being at " John Wil- " liams's," ' the Williams-bridge of the present day ; one, " at or near Kingsbridge ; " and the third, or larger, parcel within two hundred and fifty yards of Isaac Valentine's house, the Valentine's-hill of that period, as well as of this.* They were entirely unguarded ; and it is very evident that they were lying side by side, presenting an apparently formidable array, not- withstanding their actually existing harmlessness. In view of the seeming importance 'of that impos- ing park of artillery and of the entire absence of the slightest care for its safety — in retaliation, also, it may have been, for insults oflered and wrongs and in- juries inflicted — somebody, early in January, 1776, effectually spiked all the guns and plugged many of them with large stones forced into them, and escaped without having been discovered. The exploit was 1 Vide pages 251, 274, ante. - " While tliis immaculate General " [Charlex Lee,] " had the comniaiid " in New York, about 2 lO pieces of heavy cannon which were mounted " in Fort George and upon the Battery, were forcil)ly taken away by " hie orders, and lodged upon the Common," [Ihe MirAJ "facing his "Quarters. But, lest upon the arrival of the British Army, they " shouldbe retaken, he ordered them to be earried up to King' s Bridge, "about 14 miles from New York. The persons employed in this service " wanting horses, applied to the General to supply the defect. An hon- "est, a virtuous man, and a Christian, will shudder at the answer : "'Chain 20 damned Tories to each gun, and let them draw them out "*and be cursed. It is a proper employment for such villains, and a " ' punishment they deserve for their eternal loyalty they so much " ' boast of,'" (Jones's Hislori/ nf .Vcie Yvrk, during the Ilevolutioimn/ War, i., 82, 8:i.) " I counted two hundred and eighty pieces of Cannon, from twenty- "four to three pounders, at Kingsbridge, which the Committee had se- " cured for the use of the Colonies," (Doctnr Benjumin Church's treasonable letter, intercepted in July, 1775.) ^Stephen Ward to the ProuincUd Congress, " March 6, 1776." *Ji>unud of the Cnmmittee nf Safelij, " Die Mercurii, 10 ho., .\.M.. " Jany. 51, 1776." soon made known, however ; and, as may be reason- ably supposed, not only Westchester-county, but the Committee of Safety, in the City of New York, the Provincial Congress having taken a recess on the twenty-second of December preceding, was thrown into the greatest excitement. The local Committee of the County of Westchester, amply endowed, by its own lawless zeal and by the equally lawless grace of the Provincial Congress, with entire authority to arrest anybody and everybody on whom its whims or its animosities might rest, very promptly exercised its ill-founded prerogatives ; and a large number of the residents of the three Towns of Westchester, Eastchester, andMamaroneck, and some of those of Yonkers, was seized, and carried before it, and examined. Many of these were evidently dis- charged, because nothing was shown to sustain the suspicions or antipathies which had prompted those who had seized them ; but there w-ere others, a con- siderable number, who were filtered out from the great mass of the suspected, because of their seeming or construed connection with the spiking of the guns, and sent down to the City of New York, to be dis- posed of, by the generally relentless Committee of Safety, agreeably to the dictates of its stern, imperious will. Among those who were thus selected to face the ordeal of that Committee, in which the great professional experience of John Morin Scott was com- bined with the savage coldness of Alexander McDou" gal and John Brasher, were John Fowler, Peter Val- entine, William Lounsberry, James Lounsberry, Joseph Purdy, AVilliam Armstrong, William Sutton, John Flood, Isaac Purdy, John Gedney, John Haines, Joshua Gedney, Josiah Burrell, William Haines, James Haines, Junior, Thomas Haines, Isaac Gedney, Isaac Valentine, William Dicken, Isaac Valentine, Junior, and Cornelius McCartney — the latter a schoolmaster, in Yonkers — and several of these were subjected to great hardships and cruelty, in the confinement to which they were subjected.* On the thirty-first of January, 1776, the Committee of Safety directed Jacamiah Allen to remove those of the guns which were near Kingsbridge, as well as those which were near John Williams's, " to the " larger parcel at Valentine's, so as to have them all "brought together, for the greater convenience of " guarding them and drilling out the spikes;" and, at the same time, the Committee agreed to give Allen twenty shillings a])iece for clearing and unspiking the whole of the guns and for removing those at Wil- liams's; but those at Kingsbridge were to be removed at the expense of the Commitee." 'There are so many entries, in the Journal of the Committee of Safety, concerning the spiking of the guns and those who were supposed to have been interested in the transaction, that we cannot pretend to refer to them, separately. The reader is referred to the body of the Jourmd, during January and February, 1776. See. also, the Journal of the Provincial Congress, during March, 177C;etc. ^Journal of the Committee of Safety, "Pie Merrurii, 10 ho., .\..M., " Jany. 31, 1775." 324 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. On the twenty-second of January, one of the Inde- pendent Companies of the City of New York,* prob- ably "The Brown BrrFS," commanded by Captain Jonathan Blake,- was ordered into the service of the Colony, for the protection of the guns ; but a draft was subsequently made from the Minute-men of the County, to discharge that service,' a Captain, a Lieu- tenant, two Sergeants, a Corporal, fourteen privates, a Guardhouse, and all the surroundings of a permanent outpost having been provided for that easy purpose.* It might have been expected that that favored party of White Plains Minute-men would very soon excite feel- ings of envy among those, surrounding its position, who were not enjoying the feast of fat things which it had secured ; and it was so — David Barclay, recom- mended by Stephen Ward, the latter a Tavern-keeper, near where Tuckahoe is, and a deputy in the Provin- cial Congress,' applied for the job of guarding the guns, offering to do so for thirteen pounds per week, which was less than one half the amount which had been expended on the skeleton Company of Minute- men who had previously discharged that duty ; * and the offer was promptly accepted.' Jacamiah Allen, who was drilling the spikes from the guns, appears, however, to have been unwilling that any others should poach on his manor; and, very promptly, he underbid Barclay, offering to do the same guard-duty which Varian and Barclay had successively done, the former at a cost of more than twentj'-six pounds and the latter at thirteen, for only six pounds, ten shill- I The OrmmiUee of Safety to LuulenatU-eolond Graham, " In Comiut- "tee or Safetv, New-Yurk, Jany. 22, 17T6." > Comjuire Captain JoDathao B)ake°8 letter to the Committee of Safety "Head Qvartf.rs is Westchester, .lauy. 31, 17TC," with the Roster of O'Umel Malt-inn' t llegimetity — Historical Matiufcripts relnting to the War of the lieriilnlioH, in the Secretary of State's Office, Albany : MilUary ]{eturn», xxvii., 1. • ni« (''mimittee of Sofrlji to Lievlenanl-eoUxiel Graham, "Is Commit- "tee of Safety, New York, Jany. 22, 1776." "I hereby acquaint you that I have taken an account from Capt. "Variau what the exjiense of pruanling the gunn at Valentine's and "Williams' will be, thin week, viit. : 1 Capt., 1 Lieut., 2 Sergeants, 1 " Corporal, and 14 Privates. of the above men board at lOs. per " week, and the others draw provisions from the Commissary, with a "Guard iwm and firewiKKl, at £1. per week, besides items, making in "the whole about £26., and last week it was considerably more." {Strjihni Ward !• I the Pnirimutl 0>iiyr<(t», "March .% 1776.") It will li« renieml>ered that James Varian, the favored commander of th* (Juard, lu this instance, with eighteeen others, had been constituted a full-fledged Conii«ny of Westchester-county Minute-men, on the foiir- t«i'Ulh of February precetling l^vide pages 2J4, 285, ante:) and it will be seen, from that letter which has been quoted, how soon and in what manner those nineteen Westchester-county "patriots" reached the sweets to which they had a.iri'd — five held offices of greater or lees dignity, while the fonileeu who held no offices enjoyed the comforts of dniuing their sup(H>rt fumi the Commisiairy or from the Treasury of the Provincial Oongrt>«», in addition to the |iay of soldiers and what, by hook or by ciwk, they could pick up, in the neighborhood of their quarters. This wM only a uuxlerate 6|iecimen of what constituted the greater portion of the " iiatrlotism " of the Westchester-county reTOlutioiusts, at that )Kge, 4 Jann- "ary, 1776 ;" the tame, "Cambridge, 11 January, 1776;" Gmenii Ho**- ington's InsJmctumt to General Lee, " Head-Qcarters, Cambridge, 8 Jan- "uaiy, 1776." " General Washington's letter to John Adams, " Caxbrtdge, 7 Janu- "ary. 1776," clearly indicated that General Lee operated on the Ccm- mander- in-chief through John Adams, who was, then, in Maasachnsetts. 12 General Washington to the O^mmittee of Safety, " Cambridge, Jann- "ary S, 1776." ^ee, also. General Wathington's Imiinietkmt lo General Lee, "Ue.(d " QfARTEBS, Cahbridge, 8 January, 1776." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 325 of any of these transactions of that early military power, in Queens-county or in the City of New York ; but those outrages which were inflicted by his authority, on the farmers of Wcstchester-county, while he was marching tiirough the County, on his way to New York, may be noticed, in its pages — in his progress over the well-known Post-road, between the Byram-river and Kingsbridge, the same line of march which had been traversed by Sears and his banditti, a few weeks previously, he appears to have regarded himself as the legitimate possessor of despotic powers, while those among whom he was, were considered as only base creatures who were absolutely subject to his unbridled caprices and to the most extravagant exactions of those who sur- rounded him. Notwithstanding, within the pre- ceding six or seven weeks, the farmers who lived along or near the line of the Post-road had been visited by Sears and his gang of Connecticut banditti, both on their way to the City of New York and on their return, thence, to Connecticut, by whom, on each occasion, they had been ruthlessly plundered,' they were again visited, during that march of Con- necticut-men, under General Lee, by that new detach- ment of New England freebooters, and robbed, to the full extent of the hungry desires of their brutal visitors. Indeed, notwithstanding the recent visita- tion of his ruffianly countrymen to each of these j)eaceful families and the reckless depredations of those cowardly banditti. Colonel Waterbury, who commanded the Regiment whom General Lee had mustered into the Continental service — himself, as was subsequently seen and heard, in the City of New York, as fine a specimen of the same class as was needed to perpetuate it '' — under the direct sanction of the General and with his orders, but without the slightest authority, legal or revolutionary, of either the local or the general Committees or of either of the Congresses, forced his way into every house he reached, ransacked them, and carried away, without even a memorandum of the names of those from whom they were taken, everything which bore the semblance of Arms,^ leaving his victims, as far as he could possibly do so, entirely without the means of defense, easy prey for whomsoever might next appear, on an errand of similar pillage and outrage. An amusing instance of the consequential airs as- sumed by the petty local Town-commiltees, in West- chester-county, in whom had been vested such extra- ordinary powers over the persons and properties of those who lived within the several Towns in which ' Vide pages 305, 3(i8, ante. 2The associations and conduct of Colonel Waterbur)', while he was in the City of New York, to say nothing of his acknowledged thefts in Westchester county, afford ample evidence of his rufflunly pei-sonal character. 3 Vide page 322, ante. See, also, Jmimnl nf the Prnrineinl Cnngref, "Die Sabbati, 10 ho., "A.M., Feb. 17, 1776;" and the same, "Die Veneris, 10 ho., A.M., " Febry. 23, 1776." those Committees were respectively located, was seen in the action of ''the Committee of Observation for "the united Town of Bedford and Precinct of Pound- " ridge antl Salem, in Westchester," on the tenth of January, 1776, in which that pompous body, " con- " ceiving that bad consequences do arise to this dis- '' tressed country from supplying the markets, at New " York, on supposition that the common enemy may, " by that means, be furnished with Provisions," for the purpose of regulating that grave irregularity, as its narrow and bigoted understanding presented the subject to its official censorship, bravely, "Resolved, "That from and after the date hereof, the said Com- " mittee do hereby strictly forbid any of the inhabit- "ants of the said Town and Precincts, directly or, " indirectly, to carry or cause to be carried, by land "or water, provision ofany kind to the said markets; "and do hereby direct the Minute-men and all others " that are friends to their country, to do their utmost " to stop all drovers of fat Cattle, Sheep, Hogs, Poul- " try, or any other Provisions whatsoever, and from "being drove or carried through either said Town or "Precincts, for the purpose aforesaid, without leave "of the said Committee," on the penalty of being deemed enemies to their country.* In obedience to that local law, it appears that Jonathan Booth, a drover, while on his way to New York with a drove of Cattle, was detained at Bed- ford, by the Committee of that Town ; but, person- ally, he evidently pushed forward to the City of New York; and, on the twenty-fifth of January, 1776, he laid the subject before the Committee of Safety, which was then in ses^sion, and solicited its more powerful interposition. Very promptly, that body took the subject into consideration; and, without much, if any, discussion, the Committee "came to a "Resolution," which was delivered to the anxious drover, for his comfort and relief — the Committee of Safety was not inclined to concur in the questionable theory of " patriotic" economy which was maintained by its subordinate Committee in Bedford; and, after having recited, in a Preamble, the facts and the Resolution which have been already presented, to- gether with the additional declaration that " this "Committee, not doubting the good intentions of the "said Committee met at Poundridge, do nevertheless "conceive that the said Resolve has a manifest ten- "dency to distress, in the article of Provisions, the "inhabitants of this City and other friends to Liberty " whose business may call them thither," it therefore "Resolved, That it is the opinion of this Commit- "tee, that no Committee ofany City, Borough, Town, "or Precinct in this Colony ought to prevent any "such supplies of Provisions to this City as aforesaid, "unless they shall have due proof that such supplies " are intended to be furnished to persons engaged in * Holt's Setc-York Journal, No. 1725, New York, Thursday, January 25, 1776; Joimtal nf the Committee of Safety, "Die Jovis, 10 ho., A.M. " Jany. 25, 1776." 326 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " service against the Liberties of America ; nor in "such case any longer than until such (Jommiltees "respectively shall, in cases where such proof shall "have been made, have duly certified this Committee "or the Provincial Congress thereof, and until order " shall have been made thereon, by this Committee " or the Provincial Congress." ' The Committee of Bedford was undoubtedly served with a copy of this enactment by the Committee of Safety; and Jonathan Booth and his drove of fat Cattle were surely permitted to pass through that Town and to New York, without further molestation ; but that very zealous Committee did not appear to have become entirely reconciled to the abridgement of its pretensions, made more reasonable by recent action of the Committee of Safety, when, a short time afterwards, it stopped another drove of Cattle, be- longing to Joseph Booth, of Newtown, in Connecticut, while, like that which had been previously stopped, by the same Committee, it was on its way to the New York market. In the latter instance, the obstructed drover re- turned to Newtown ; procured a Certificate from the Committee of that Town, declaring that he " had " lately served his country as a faithful friend and "soldier in the northern Army, under General Schuy- "ler; that he had suffered by the stoppage of his " Cattle, at Bedford, on the way to the New-Y'ork "market; that he is the owner of the said Cattle; "and that the said Committee take pleasure in recom- " mending him as a friend of his country;" and, with that Certificate, he proceeded to the City of New York, and presented the case to the Provincial Con- gress, which was then in session. It is said " the "Congress took the same into consideration, and " came to the following determination, to wit : " Whereas a large sup))ly of fresh Provisions will " be required for the Continental Army, in and near " the City of New-York : " Eesolved and Ordered, That no obstruction " whatsoever be given to any person or persons in " passing and re-passing through any of the Counties " in this Colony, with fat Cattle, Sheep, Hogs, or any " kind of Provisions, for the purpose of supplying the " inhabitants of the said City of New- York or the " Continental Army, in and near the said City, unless "such person or persons shall have been adjudged to " be, or held up, as inimical to this country." In addition to that general action of the Provincial Congress, which controlled or assumed to control every other revolutionary body within the Colony, the Congress also gave to the complaining drover, a copy of the following Order : " That the bearer " hereof, Joseph Booth, be permitted to pass, with "his drove of Cattle, to the City of New-York;"'^ 1 Journal of Committee of Safety^ "Die Jovis, lu ho., A.M., Jany. 25, "1776." - Journal of Die Proniicial Congress, "Die .luvis, 4 lio., P.M., Fel). 29, "1776." and he evidently returned to Bedford, a happier man than when he had left that Town, a few days pre- viously. In the same connection, it may be proper for us to remind the reader that, about a fortnight before the Committee of Bedford made its second attempt to lay a local embargo on what was intended for the New Y^ork market, the Committee of Safety itself had in- terfered with the disposition of the surplus of the products of the farms in Westchester-county to resi- dents of the neighboring Colony of Connecticut, in which, very probably, Bedford, one of the border- towns of the County, had materially suffered. The facts are thus related in the official records of the Committee of Safety ; ' and the reader may judge therefrom, something concerning the animus of the Committee of Bedford, when, on the second occasion, it interfered with the disposition of the products of Connecticut, within the Colony of New York, while the disposition of the products of farms in Bedford and its vicinity, in Connecticut, was interfered with and stopped, summarily, by a higher authority. " Col. Gil. Drake informed the Committee that " sundry persons from Connecticut are purchasing "up" [/or speculative purposes "the barrelled Beef " and Pork in Westchester. Thereupon the Conimit- " tee came to the following Besolution, to wit : "'Whereas the Continental Congress, by their " 'Resolution of the first day of November last, have " ' resolved that no produce of the United Colonies "'be exported, except from Colony to Colony under " 'the directions of the Committees of Inspection and " ' Observation, and except from one part to the other "'of the same Colony, before the first day of March " ' next, without the permission or order of the Con- " ' tinental Congress ; " ' And whereas this Committee of Safety for the " ' Colony of New York conceives that it is necessary "'to prevent the sale of all the barrelled Beef and " 'Pork in the County of Westchester, and to retain '"the same for the Continental service in this Col- "'ony, as such Provisions may be necessary for the "' Continental Army in this Colony : " ' Eesolved, That the Committee of the County " ' of Westchester be requested to take effectual " ' means to prevent the sale and transportation of '"any barrelled Beef or Pork out of Westchester- "' county, to any person or persons residing out of " ' this Colony, until the further order of the Provin- " ' cial Congress or of the Comuiiitee of Safety of this "'Colony.' " A draft of a letter to the Committee of West- " chester-county was read and approved of, and is in " the words following, to wit : " ' Gentlemen : " ' We have been informed by a Gentleman " ' from your County, that some of the inhabitants of ^ Journal of the CommiUee of Safety, "Die Sabbati, 4 ho., P.M., Febru- •'ary in, 1770." THE AMERICAN llEVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 327 "' your County are disposing of their barrelled Beef " ' and Pork, to persons out of the Colony. We ap- " ' prehend that such Provisions will be wanted for "'the use of the Continental Army in this Colony, " 'and that the service may possibly suffer if all the "'barrelled Provisions are taken out of the Colony. " ' We therefore request you to take the most effectual "' measures to carry the enclosed Resolution into exe- " ' cutiou. " ' We are, respectfully, Gentlemen, " 'Your very humble servts., " ' By order of the Committee of Safety. " ' To the Onnmittee of the Coirnfy of We^lc/wster.' " It will be seen that the farmers of Wcstchester- county, at the time of which we write, were prohib- ited from finding a market for the surplus of their products, beyond the limits of the Colony or, at their own doors, to those who were not of New York, and that, in consequence of that prohibition, they were limited to those local purchasers, forestallers, or specu- lators, who should incline to purchase, and at prices which were not regulated by competition. At the same time, as has been seen, the surplus products of the farms in Connecticut were brought into the Col- ony, in open disregard of the provisions of that Re- soludon of the Continental Congress which was used as the warrant for the prohibition of the reciprocal trade of Westchester-county with Connecticut ; and the mar- ket of New York, for nothing else than the products of the Colony of New York, which the Resolution would have guaranteed, if it harrd Sfiriiit'j, drurrtd of the CoiUinnttul Ih-oopn^ " llKAi>Qi'.\itTKiis, March IG, 1776." 10 deiwral Lcc lo General Widhiiiijloii, " Nkw-Youk, February 29, 1776;" Jones's Hixlonj of .Vtio York during the lievolutiontiri/ War, i., G9. .\t the period referred to in the text, that was known aa " Waldron's " Ferry." 330 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. but it was composed of ineu of notorious poverty and meanness,' by no means representative men of the yeomanry of Westcb ester-county ; " many of them " were, "destitute of "arms" ' and, therefore, useless for soldiers ; and it appears tluit, as such characters were apt to be, they were recklessly destructive of the private property of those who were richer than they, not sparing, even, the property of those who had endeavored to make them more than ordinarily comfortable.' The Lieutenant-colonel of the Regi- ment, who was, also, a Deputy irom Westchester- county in the Provincial Congress, c()m|)lained to that body that the Regiment " lodged in an uncom- " fortable manner for the want of Cribs for its l)eds; " and he insisted that it was " necessary that a car- " penter be sent to make Cribs for their beds; " and a car[)euter was accordingly sent to Hoern's Hook, for the pur[)sc(iucntly, \_Fni(iri/ IS, 1771),] tinothcr Committee who had been appointed to apportion the tlifferent quota of Officers and Privates to be raised in the sevcrtil Counties, made a Report, which was adopted, two Companies, as we have already stated, being ajiportioned to Westchester- county ; and, on the afternoon of the same day, a Circular Letter was sent by the Provincial Congress to each of the Coun- ty-committees throughout the Colony, informing it of the arrangement and urging its attention to the mat- ter of the enlistments. As that Circular Letter is pe- culiarly interesting, in its details of the terms of en- listment into the Continental Army of 1776, a place may properly be found for it, in these pages. It was in the following words : "In Provincial Congress, " New- York, Feb. 18, 177(). "Sir: ' " The Congress having determined that your Couu- " ty shall have the oj)pt>rtunity of raising [^/'o] Ccm- " panics in the four Regiments to be raised by order 7 Instrueliona to the Colonels and other Officers for Enlistment, etc., "Committee OF Safety, New-York, Jany. 27, 1776." 8 Elihu Marvin, Chiiinnan, to the Committee of Safeti/, " In Coi NTV "Crised and sympathetic neighbors; besides which hindrance, the conserva- tism of the County had been too barbarously treated by those who were in rebellion, to j)ermit it to extend to that "common cause" the slightest favor, while the wound.s. which it had thus received were yet bleeiling. It was, indeed, true that War- rants had been .sent with the Circular Letter, in Feb- ruary; and it is undoubtedly true, also, that the favored ones, throughout the County, Warrants in hand and OtHces in prospective, had employed all their powers of conciliation and pereuiision to ensure 1 JuHmnl of Ihe Pntincial Cungrest, "Die Solia, P.M., Feb. 18, "ITTli." 'ViJo p«ges27r), 277, ante. I a successful enlistment of the quota and the conse- quent reward to themselves ; but Westchester-county would not be conciliated far enough to send her well- to-do sons into the Army ; and the Warrants were re- turned to the Congress and the proffered Offices were not secured by those who had hankered for them. The i)rospect for the four Battalions, as far as Westchester-county was concerned in it, was not promising; and the Committee of Safety wa.s already entertaining the proposal to call back the Warrants which had been sent into the County, more than two months previously, when a letter was received by that body, from nill)ert Drake, the Chairnum of the Committee of the County, stating that one, Ezekiel Hyatt, or Ilaiglit, with his associates, had enlisted .seventy men in Westchester-county, for a Connecticut Regiment ; but w:us inclined to take them, as a por- tion oftheqiu>ta of that County, into a New York Regiment, if Commissions could be assured to those who were dcsignati'd as their Olliccrs.'* Subse(iuently, it was seen that the men wdiom Ezekial Hyatt, or Haight, or Hait — for by each of these several names that " patriotic " gentleman Wiis kuovvu, at different times — had enlisted into his Com- pany had been entrapped, by false representations; * and the revelations of unopened records of that period, more recently opened, reveal the fact that Commissions had already been issued, by the Conti- nental Congress, to Ezekiel Hait, Esquire, as Cap- tain,^ to Caleb Hobby, Gentleman, as First Lieuten- ant,'' to Jose])h De(troet, Gentleman, as Second Lieu- tenant," and to Lsaac Poineair, Gentleman, as En- sign,'* all dated on the eighth ofA[)ril, more than a fortnight before (iilbert Drake wrote to the Commit- tee of Safety, asking Commissions for the same Offi- cers from the Provincial Congress of New York ; and that each of thosi.' Commissions had specifically ; " Journal iif thi- CuiiimilUe nf Hiift lji, " Die Jiivis, 111 lio., A.M., April 2.1, 177(;.-' *.l List ttf Die Offiirrx mimes in Xrir IV.ri- 'IVoops, eU. : Col. .Wi>ii<;ii/'» Iteijinmil. (5). — Ilislitrinil Maiinsi i iiih, etc. : MilUiirii Commillee, xxv., 4.S8. 6 llislnrii-iil MiiuHitcripfti^ etc. : Milituri/ /^'/Hr«s, xxvii., 88. <• llii^oririil .V. " Ili^tnrirtd ViftiiiM-riplXj elo. : Militnnj fMnnis^ xvvii., 112. » //i.i/..ri.-.i/ .lf.(;ii(» n;i/.v, etc. : Mililuni /i'./m-iw, xxvii., KM. ' Tliere iiie gixHl reiiwiMs for lielieviiiR that that ( 'omiiaiiy, Hlie (he similar CuiHimiy cuiniiiaiKleil li\ Cornelius Steeiiroil, rU-(ii Ma«?(.swyj/x, etc. : Militiiri/ do-nnniltee, xxv., 488. 3 Ibid. * anm-al A!<:mntliT I,: Uuhn-I Ynlrs, " Y"N units, 21 October, "177G." 5 Ibid. ^ (leufral MvDontjaV t lirroutitmi'Inti/ni of LU'uU'iuiut-Otilonel Vtm (^n'tlaudt — UUUtrk-al Ma)imn'ipt\ etc. ; M'dUtmj Ctmuitittrf^ xxv., 845. * Litt of (tttift'-rs^ wnttcs of Nar York Troojift, viz. : Orlouel MrDntojuVs UfLiimHid. — llishtrirnl Miiititscrijilfi^ etc. : MiUlarij t 'inntiiillrr^ xxv., 188. «Ibid. ^ Jimrnnl of thi- Coiimiilln of Siifrli/, "DieSabbati, 10 ho., A.M., April " 27, 1776." l*> Cornelius Steenrod was the owner of three fulling-mills, if not ot some others; and he aildrcssed "the Convention," without dale, reqiiCHting protection for hia millei'S. — Conn-liHs Stt-rnrod it> the Onivrnfinn," with- out place or date — Juuruuh of the I*rufinciul Coiiyrcas, ii., 147. and an intimate friend and confidante of Stephen De Lancey, a son of the late distinguished Chief-justice De Lancey, who was also one of the Proprietors and a resident of that Manor," there can be no doubt. He was j^eculiarly anxious to obtain an office, no mat- ter what, nor on what terms ; he was particularly zealous in his desire that he might administer test- oaths to his neighbors;'' and it is more than pi-obable that he was, in fact, a " friend of the Government," in disguise, notwithstanding all his official dis- claimers.'* He had been in command of one of the skeleton Companies of Minute-men of which the skeleton Regiment of Colonel Samuel Drake had been nominally composed'^ — it is more than probable that one of those two blank Commissions, for Captains of Companies, which had been issued in advance of the formation of those Companies,'" was held by him ; and it is far from impossible that the men whom he and his Subalterns had evidently on hand, when he applied to the Committee of Safety for admittance into the service of the Continent, in a different Regiment, had been really enlisted for the re-inforcement of the former Regiment, then at Hoern's Hook. He evidently completed his Company, in season to take a place, as the second Company of the appor- tionment to Westchester-county, in the First Regi- ment of the New York Line, in the Continental Army of 1776, commanded by Colonel Alexander McDougal, of which it was the Sixth Company, Isaac Titus having been his First Lieutenant, Isaac Ruyckman, Junior, his Second Lieutenant, and Ben- jamin Jones his Ensign.'' But, like Captain Hyatt, Captain Steenrod had deceived his men and the Congress, in his enlistment of his command for six and twelve months instead of for the entire period of 11 Conielius Steenrod to the Commiltee of Snfeti/, " January 31, 1777 ; " the Onuminxionern of ^iefjnestratum tn the C^tmiell of Hitfelij, Peeks Kill, Jnly "24, 1717;" titepheii De Umceij to (in-iiel!iis Steenrod, "May 3, 1777 ;" Tediiiiony of Oornetiux Steenrod before the f\oilinUtee of Westx-hester-roimtl^, .Iline 13, 1777 ; VonieUus Steenrod tn tlie Convention of the Stole, " West- "CHESTKU Coi'NTV, CoiiTi.ANnT M.\.s'nit, June 2s, 1777," and the several enclosures therein ; etc. 12 He was anxious, by turns, to command a Troop of Hoi-se, to com- mand a Com|iany of Minute-men, and to raise and coiniiiand a ( 'ompany in the Continentiil Line; and, in neither of tliese, does lie appear to have paid much respect to the proprieties of tlie iimha taking. 13 Cornelim Steenrod to " the Cri.nrud t'oittjress, ii., 147. i^In June, 177f», Isaac Youngs testified before the Committee on Con- spiracies, of the Provincial ('ongre.ss, that Tlioiii.TS Vernon, that prisoner who made so much trouble, bad informeil him that one of the Captains in McDougal's Regiment of Continentals, wius a loyalist, in correspond- ence with Governor Tryoii, and acting under the oidei>i of the (Joveruor. (Hhtm-U-al Manuseriptx, Hie.. : Miaell.ineoutt Vuperx, xxxiv., 4iM ) Cornelius Steenrod had only recently joined that Itegiment, at the head of a Couipany, » hen that statement was made. IS llemrtd Lord Stirlinifs Generid Orders, " New York, March 10, "177i;." i",7.)«nm! of the ProvinqUd Cvnijrexs, "Die Merciirii, 10 ho., A.M., Oc- " tober 25, 1776." ^' List of OJleers' mmies of New Yorl Troo/is, viz.: Colonel MelknujoVs Itegirnent — Uisloricul Manuscripts, etc.: MiliUtry Committee, xxv., 488. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 333 the War;' his command reciprocating, like that of Captain Hyatt, by deserting, in great numbers, and, thereby, seriously crippling tin- Regiment;' and, also like Captain Hyatt, personally, he was reported as "unfit" for his command.' The similarity of that Company and its Officers and that commanded by Captain Hyatt and its Officers is singularly continued in the fact tiiat the Second Lieutenant who was with Captain Steenrod when the Company was mustered into the Continental Service, was subsequently cashiered,^ assuredly lor conduct which was more than ordinarily bad ; and in the Report, concerning First Lieutenant Titus and Ensign Jones, that " These two are unfit for the service."'' Cai)tain And)rose Horton, who commanded one of the Companies from Westchester-county, in the Cam- paign of 1775, appears to have returned to the service, probably from another County, in 1776;* but noth- ing more than a mere mention of his name was made, without the sligluest additional information. Neither Captain Daniel Mills nor Captain Jonathan Piatt, each of wliom had commanded a Company from Westchester-county, in the Campaign of 1775, ap- pears to have returned to the service, in 1776. It will be seen, from the respective records of the fraudulent practices of Ezekiel Hyatt and Cornelius Steenrod and their respective associates, in their en- listment of men for their respective commands; from the records of the questionable manner in which their respective Companies were carried, without their consent, into a line of the Continental Service for which they were not enlisted ; from the records of the personal unfitness for their respective offices of the several Officers of both these Companies ; and from those of the consequent disaffection and deser- tions of the enlisted men, that Westchester-county's quota, in the Continental levy of 1776, was of question- able usefulness to the country or the cause in which it was nominally engaged. Whatever may have been the character and conduct of the Non-commis- sioned Officers and Privates of which those Companies were respectively composed — and it is due to the mem- ory of those unknown men that it should be said of them that no record of bad conduct, on their parts, has ' Ibiil. -iliiiintl .\h riiiiihr Mrlhm.j.il lo Hubert Yiilen, "YnSKKRS, 21 OrtiiluT, "n-i;." Ot^tifml Mi-lhmijuVn ItecnnnuemUttion of Lu'iiteiiitHl-rolmiel CtirlhtmU. — Hi-^tftrir,il Mnititucrijits^ vtc. : Miiiltinj f'nmmittee^ xxv., 845. i *(itliliiiii Stfiniiid III lite Prnriiiiiiil ri/ii;/rejw, "t'AMi' at New Viirk, j "2() .IiiiHs 177(;." I <)/ OJirm' AVmiM of AVir-JV>ri- Trimiis, vi:., (iiUmel MrlknujiiV a Ufijiiiieitt. — IlistnrU-al Miitiuittrijitti^ t'tf. : MiUhtnj ('ininnittfi\ xxv., 48.S. " Ucri iiitinK Wiirriints wern issiiul ti> liiiii, on tlic tenth of Marcli, nVCi, und to'l'liiiniiw I.i' Foy. on tlic (wi-nty eiglilli cif tin- siinii' iiiuntli, fur tlio Nintli (Iiimiuuiy i>f the Vint Ucj^imi-nt of tliu Xi w York Line of tlii! Continental Army of 1770 ; bnl tlx' r.ionl wiys, also, "Captain Ilortun "anil Olliri'in' loniniissions not miuiv onl," {llr' iiiiliiiij H drnui/x ikxiuiI bl/lhe (iiul'cnliim liitllf Finl Arm Yink I '<>nliii,-nl'ilg—llMi>riiiil Mniillscriiils, etc.; MUiOiri) (V.iimii«.v, xxv., li;.'), (;7i; ;) and it is |iri.lialile that they were amont; those whose liluDilislinii'ntK were uneuccessful in obtaiuiDg recruitii, ua has been stated in the text, (j^iij/t 3'il, loifo.) ] come down among the debrit of that period, since it cannot be regarded as a crime that some of them, un- bidden, in that era of disregard of law, helped them- selves to the freedom, belonging to themselves, of which their Officers had fraudulently deprived them — it cannot be consistently pretended, by any one, that the Officers of those Companies were reasonably rep- resentative men of the great body of the farmers of Colonial ^V'estehester-county, of that or of any other l)eriod : whether or not they may be regarded as representative men of that other and smaller class of the inhabitants of that County, in 1775-76, of those whose "patriotism" was only ill-concealed selfish- ness, of those whose devotion to " the common cause" was graduated with nothing else than with the jjrom- ised profits of the investment, of those whose zeal was tempered with nothing as effective as with an Office of some sort, the reader can determine for him- self, from the evidence which has been already ad- duced, illustrative of the character and conduct of the revolutionary faction, within that County, during that later Colonial Period. Among the multitude of requirements, made by General Lee, either on his own motion or at the prompting of those who pandered to his baser incli- nations, and which were obsequiously obeyed by the Provincial Congress, was one, made early in March, 1776, for "a Magazine of Provisions and Military •' Stores, to be established in Westchester-county," the requisition being supplemented with a recommen- dation that " the Deputies of Westchester-county " purchase and deposit, in diff'erent stores in that " County, twelve hundred barrels of good salted Pork, "wherever it is to be bought; and that the said " salted Pork be repacked and pickled by a sworn " Packer of New York ; and that the Deputies of "Albany-county purchase eighteen hundreil and fifty " bushels of good Peas, and send them to the Depu- " ties of Westchester-county, to be by them stored in " the same manner." ' The proi)osed test of the quality of the Pork to be purchased was, however, not satisfactory to those who were manii)ulatiiig the Congress, in the interest of the job; and, on the ninth of March, when that body resumed the e(msideratioii of the proposition, it was led to suppose tiiat the Resolution which had been adopted, approving the same, was " im])erfeet, "inadequate to the end, and that the method thereby " projjosed will create unnecessary expense." It also .•i])pointed a Committee of three Deputies, two of whom were .John Thomas, Junior, and Colonel Joseph Drake, both of them Deputies from Westchester- county, "to reconsider the method of establishing a " Magazine of Provisions, and to report thereon."* 'Jimriininf Ihf Pr«riii,-M Cniijrivs, "Pie Lnna-, :i ho., P.JI., Man h '■4, 1770." ^ Jimruiil nf Ihi- /Wi'iifidJ Cmii/rfs*, " Die Salihuti, 10 hn., A JI , March "9, 177U." 334 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. The whole subject h;id evidently been considered, informally, before it was laid before the Congress — in the expressive phrase of practical men, it had been " cut and dried " — and the Committee " speedily re- " turned and reported" a substitute for the original Resolution, which was more " perfect," more " ade- " quate totheend," and less expensive, although it was, also, less favorable to the Congress — it did no more than to omit the provision for the employment of a Packer from New York, by whom, also, the quality of the Pork could have been accurately ascertained, leaving every other portion of the original Resolu- tion, in the form in which it had been adopted, five days previously. The evidently i)re-arranged Report and Resolution were promptly approved, without a dissenting voice ; ' and the scheme was, so far, a com- plete success. There does not ajipear to have been a doubt con- cerning the entire safety of such a Magazine, nor of such a series of Magazines, notwitiistaiiding the known hostility of by far the greater number of the inhabitants of Westchester-county, within which they were to be established, against all which per- tained to the Rebellion — an liostility, too, which had become intensified by reason of the repeated and ruinous outrages to which the Conservatives among them, and lew were not Conservatives, had been subjected; and if anything were wanted to establish the fact of the (juiet, law-observing, and upright personal character of those much abused and nuicli persecuted farmers of Colonial Westchester-county, it may be found in that voluntary tribnte to their integrity, thus unwittingly, but freely, paid by their most virulent enemies. A Military Magazine estab- lished in the midst of a community who was hostile to those who gathered and establislu'd it, without ample provision for its |)rotecti()n, and dej)ending, largely, if not entirely, for its safety, on the forbearance ol those among whom it was placed, was an anomaly in Military Science; but the farmers of Westchester- county were not inclined to retaliate; and those who were leaders in the Rebellion could, therefrom, have learned something which would have been useful to themselves and to their "common cause," had not they been besotted in their greed for ()fHce and its emoluments and for the authority and the opportuni- ties for personal aggrandizement which office-bearing, in a revolutionary era, always allbrds to those who are the grc:ater zealots. The Deputies from Westchester-county were not slow in their movements, homeward, as soon as that Report and that Resolution had been adopted, leav- ing the Deputation in the Congress without the re(juisite (luorum, in their eager pursuit of the advan- tages, to themselves, which were offered in their pur- chases of barrelled Pork. The rea.son for the embargo ^Journal of the Provincial Vout/ress, "Die Sabbuti, lUlio., A.M., March "y, 1776." which had closed the foreign markets against the pro- ducers and which had monopolized the trade in favor of the local buyers and at their own prices, was then made manifest to all observers ; and the favored Depu- ties, who were the ofiicial buyers, and their personal friends were provided with an outlet, at fiivorable prices, not only for the surphis of their own products, but for those additional stocks which the rigidly enforced embargo and their more accurate knowledge of what the future was to develope, had placed within their control ; and that without any limitations concerning prices to be paid, and without any danger, concerning the quality of the article to be sold, from the adverse reports of a sworn Packer and Inspector, from the City of New York. On the thirteenth of March, a letter was received from General Washington, expressing to " the Com- " manding Officer of the American F'orces, New "York,"'' the suspicions of the Commander-in-chief that the Royal Army which was then enclosed in Bos- ton would soon be transferred to New York, and ap- pealing to the Provincial Congress for its best efforts "to " prevent their forming a lodgment before" [Ac, Gcn- ertil WdfifiiiKjfon,] "can come or send to your assist- "ance." The intelligence thus communicated to the Provin- cial Congress, for General Lord Stirling immediately submitted the letter to that body, led to another revision of the Resolution authorizing the establish- ment of a Military Magazine in Westchester-county, already referred to, wiiich resulted in the ado|)tion of the following Resolution, nut necessarily as a substi- tute for the other, nor probably regarded as such a substitute, in j)ractise : " Ordkred, That Colonel Gilbert Drake repair " immediately to Westchester-county and purchase "twelve hundred barrels of the best Pork, and " have the same safely stored, agreeable to the " Resolves of this Congress, of the ninth day of "March instant; that betake with him, from New- " York, a sworn Inspector and Repacker of Pork, to " inspect and re-pack the same ; and that he i)urchase " and store, at the cheapest rate in his power, Flour " sufiicient for the use of five thousand nu^ii for a " month." Notwithstanding the adroitness of Colonel Gilbert Drake, in concentrating within his own ])erson the sole authority to purchase all the Pork and all the Flour which were considered necessary, when the last- named Resolution wa.s ado])teil by the Provincial Congress, his associates in the De|)Utation from Westchester-county were already in the field, bar- gaining for barrelled Pork, under the provisions of the former Resolution ; entering into comi)etition ^Slfjihen Muglun, A.D.C., lo the Commanding OJic the Pork, leaving the rival buyers undis- turbed, which was undoubtedly done for political reasons — it would not have been prudent to have ar- rested the Deputation of a County, while it was so eagerly engaged in a still-hunt for some of the i)ick- ings which had been placed within its reach, by the revolutionary leaders. The enactment of the Com- mittee of Safety was in these words: " Whereas diU'erent :aragrai)h, amended, and corrected," it is said to have been " ajijjroved," subject, however, to a i'urther consideration, on the following morning.'* 3 Vid(! i)ages 328, 329, ante. *Joiinml of the Prorincinl C'ihjicss, " Die Salikiti, 10 lio., .\.M., Deer. "16, 1776." Journal of the I'roviiniiil Conji ees, " Die Luna', ID ho., A.M., Blarch "11, 177C." ojoiinml of Ihi' I'mvhuliil Ciimjrixs, "Die Luna-, 1 ho., I'.M., Marcli 11, " 1776.". Tile oijscurity of the Joitnnils of tlic second Provincial Congress, on the subject under consideration, is relieved, to sonic extent by the Joiir- of the third of those Congresses in an occasional reference to the subject. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 337 Besides that almost unintelligible entry in the Jour- nah of the Provincial Congress, no mention appears to have been made on the subject, if any thing i'urther was done with it. It is probable, however, that an Election was ordered to be made for Deputies, on the third Tuesday, which was the sixteenth day, of April ; ' and that the fourteenth day of May was designated for the meeting of the new Provincial Congress.'^ The Provincial Congress itself appears to have been disbanded, informally— its Journal makes no mention of a formal adjournment — on the afternoon of Mon- day, the thirteenth of May, 177(5 ; ' and, thus the second Provincial Congress of the Colony of New York and its doings, for evil or for good, became sub- jects for the pens of those who should thenceforth assume the grave and responsible duties of historians. We mentioned, in another part of this narrative,'* the election of " a Committee for the County of West- " Chester," on the eighth of May, 1775, and the ap- pointment of Gilbert Drake for its Chairman, and Micah Townsend for its Clerk. It appears that, either by pre-determined limitation or otherwise, the term of service of that County Committee expired in May, 1776; and, in order that the succession of that body might be continued, notice to that effect having been given, on the sixteenth of April, 1776, "a Number "of the Freeholders and Inhabitants of Westchester- " county appeared at the Court House," and " chose " the Persons hereafter named to serve as a Committee " for the said County from the 2"^ Monday in May, " 1776. to the 2°'' Monday in May, 1777 — any twenty " whereof to be a Quorum, vizt : "For Morrissania. "Lewis Morris, Jun". —1. "For Westchester. " Thomas Hunt, "Abraham Leggett, " Israel Honeywell, " John Oakley, "Gilbert Oakley, " Daniel White, " John Smith — 7. '' For Yonkers. " William Hadley, " William Betts, " Thomas E.mmons, " John Crawford, "Fred. V. Cortlandt —5. For Eastchester. Stephen Sneden, Edward Briggs, Daniel Sebring — 3. For New Rochclle and Pelhain. 2- g Myers, 1 1 GUION, "«l Willis, iij LIP Well, JuN'. — 4 For Mamaroneck. Gil Budd Horton — 1. 1 The elections in the Counties of New York, Westcliestor, Duchess, Kings, Queens, Tryon, Ulster, and Orange were held on that day ; while Albany-county ajipears to have elected her Deputies on the 25th ; Suf- folk, on the 18th ; Richmond-county, on the 23rd ; and Charlotte-county, on the 1st May. 'Journal of the Provincial Congress, "Die Martis, 10 ho., A.M., May "14, 177G." ^ JotinuU of the Provincial Congress, "Die Luniv, 3 ho., P.M., May 13 " 1776." Vide pages 258, 259, 2G7, ante. 27 "For PhiUpsburg. " Israel Honeywell, JuN^ " Abraham Storm, " Peter Van Tassell, "Glode Requeau, "Abr"" Ledew, "James Hammond, " Joseph Youngs, "Gershom Sherwood, "James Requeau, " Thomas Champenois, —10. "For W. Plains. " Benjamin Lyon, " Joshua Hatfield — 2. "For Scars dale. " Samuel Crawford— 1. "For H. Precinct. " Thomas Thomas, " W". Miller, "Isaiah Maynard — 3. " For North Castle. " Michael Hays, " Peter Lyon, "Jacob Purdy, " Andrew Sniffin, " Gilbert Palmer, "Caleb Merritt, Jun'. " Caleb Carpenter — 7. For Rye. Samuel Townsend, Israel Seaman, Fred. Say, Samuel Lyon, Gilbert Lyon, John Thomas, Jun'^6. For Bedford. Elijah Hunter, John WoolseV, Titus Miller, Israel Lyon — 4. For Poundridge. Josh Lock Wood — 1 For Salem. Abijah Gilbert — 1. For Cortlandfs Manor. Joseph Travis, Daniel BirdsAll, Samuel Drake, Abraham Purdy, Nathaniel Hyatt, Joseph Lee, Ebenezer Purdy, Isaac Norton, Halsey Wood-^9. For RijcJcs Patent. Hercules Lent, 1 — Total 66." ' Of this second County Committee, John Thomas, Junior, of Rye, was made the Chairman, and Edward Thomas was appointed its Clerk. The day after the dissolution of the second Pfovin^ cial Congress, \_May 14, 1776,] was the day which had been appointed for the organization of the third of that series of Congresses." There was, however, on that day and on the four succeeding days, an insuffi- cient number of members of the several Deputations to form a quorum of the Counties ; but, on the fifth day, \_May 18, 1776,] the Counties of New York, Richmond, Suffolk, Westchester, Kings, Charlotte, and Tryon — those of Albany, Queens. Ulster, Glou- cester, Cumberland, Duchess, and Orange were either entirely unrepresented or were without the requisite numbers to make their several Deputations complete — assumed the consistent, counter-revolutionary respon- sibility of organizing the Congress and of proceeding to transact business.' It continued in session, without tak* 6 Members of a Commiflee fcr Weslctiester-coatUy— Historical Mantiscripts, etc.: Miscellaneous Papers, xxxviii., 309. ^Journal of the Provincial Congress, " Die Martis, 10 ho., A.M., May " 14, 177G." ' Jintnial of the Proviticial Congress, "Die Sal bati, 10 ho., A.M, May " 18, 177G." Ulster, Gloucester, and Cumborland-countius were entirely unrepre- sented ; ineteud of the requisite Oiree, only Messrs. Cuyler and Glenn appeared from Albany-county ; instead of the requisite tliree, only Messrs. Blackwcll and Lawrence appeared from Queens-county ; instead 338 HISTOKY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. ing any recess, until the thirtieth of June, when, be- cause of supposed clanger, in the City of New York, it adjourned to meet at the White Plains, on the fol- lowing Tuesday, \_Jyfy 2, 1776] ; ' but the Journals very clearly indicate that no such adjourned meeting was attempted — the Deputies had more important business requiring their personal attention ; and the third Congress was permitted to pass away, without further ceremony. The third Provincial Congress was distinguished by the entrance into it, among the Deputies from the City and County of New York, of John Jay, James Duane, John Alsop, Philip Livingston, and Francis Lewis, notwithstanding all of them were, also, Dele- gates from the Colony to the Continental Congress, then in session, in Philadelphia; and because three of those tjve are now known to have resisted the ear- lier movements toward Independence, in that Con- gress,^ and to have, also, resisted the later movements in that direction, in the Provincial Congress, it is a reasonable conclusion that the hegira of those three, if not that of the whole number, had been made for the purpose of obstnicting the ad()j)tion of that in- creasingly jxipular measure, as well as that of the es- tablishment of a new form of government, through of the requisite (Arce, only Mr. SclieDck apjicarcd from Duchess-county; and of the reijnieite /»o from Orange-county, only Mr. Little ajipeared. 1 Jdiiriial of the I'rin iiicial Congress, " Sunday morning, June 30, " 1776." Mr. Bolton, {nMory nf Weslchtster-counly, original edition, ii., 359 ; the same, second edition, ii., 5G4,)said of the imaginary journey of the Deputies, from the City of New York to the Wliite Plains, between the adjournment of the Congress and the day on which it was to bo re-as- seniblcd, " The journey between New York and the Plains was per- " formed by tlie members on horseback, Pierre van Cortliindt, the Presi- " dent, riding at tlioir head. As cxiires.ses overtook tlu in from General " Wasliington, the House was called to order, on horseback, and several " Resolutions ])assed." As has been already stated, there was not the slightest attempt made to keep up the organization ol the Congress, after its hurried and in- formal dissolution, on that eventful Sunday ; that there was, therefore, no such funereal procession as Mr. liolton has described, nor any such olUcial acts, on horseback or on foot, as he has imagined ; and that there was no such meeting of the Provincial Congress, at the Wliite Plains, on Tuesday, tlie second of July, ashe has left his readers to suppose. As Jlr. Bolton has not named any aiithority for Jiisstiitement, altliough he was not the tirst to print it, he must be regarded as autliorially responsible for it ; and, therefore, it may be proper to say, further, that PieiTe Van Cortlandt was not the President of the Congress, nor had he been such, at any time. General AVoodhull having been elected its President, and John Haring, of Orange-county, occupied the Chair, as President j)io tern., on the last day of its session. In the same connection, it may be said that, although Colonel Pierre Van Cortlandt was elected as one of the Deputies from Westchester-connty to the third Provincial Congress, that under notice, he never occupied a scat in it, even for a single day. -The Resolution of July 2, 1770, separating the Colonies from the Mother Counti'y, was not the earliest declaration of Independence, in the Colo- nies, by any means. The correspondence of Jolin Adams is well filled with evidence of his correct judgment of the real character of the earlier enactments of the Continental Congress ; but the Resolution which was introduced into that Congress, early in May, 177r., and adopted on the tenth of that month, and the Preamble to that Resolution, which was adopted on the fifteenth, recomnieiuling the adoi)tiun of new forms of Government, in the several Colonies, was, assuredly, nothing else than a Resolution of Independence, thinly disguised by the prefix of another niuue. the Provincial Congress of New York, at least long enough to enable the Eoyal Commissioners for efl'ect- ing a reconciliation with the Colonies, who were then approaching New York, to exhibit their powers and their inclinations, in that better desired measure. How successfully the scheme was carried out, in the latter body, will be seen, hereafter. ***** The deputation from Westcb ester-county to that third Provincial Congress, said to have been " duly " elected to represent the said County in Provincial " Congress for twelve months, with such powers and " authority as was recommended in the Eesolutions "of the late Provincial Congress to be given them, " any three of whom to be a quorum," were Colonel Pierre Van Cortlandt, Colonel Lewis Graham, Colo- nel Gilbert Drake, Major Ebenezer Lockwood, Gouv- erneur Morris, William Paulding, Jonathan G. Tomp- kins, Samuel Haviland, and Peter Fleming.^ During the less than two months which intervened between the organization and the untimely dissolution of that third Provincial Congress, [J/ay 18 to June 30, 1776,] the Northern Array was effectually driven from Canada; and all which had been promised and hoped for, in that very well planned, but premature and expensive, expedition, produced nothing else than disappointment and disaster, the latter as serious to those of the resident Canadians who had favored the invading Colonists, as it was to the latter. In South Carolina, the superior bravery of Colonel Moultrie and his handful of Carolinians, even when hampered by the superior authority but inferior prac- tical knowledge of General Lee, had secured lasting honor to himself and to his gallant command and re- newed safety to his own country ; and " though not " of much magnitude, in itself, it was, like many " other successes attending the American Arms, in " the commencement of the War, of great importance " in its consequences : by impressing on the Colonists " a conviction of their ability to maintain the con- " test, it increased the number of those who resolved " to resist British authority and assisted in paving " the way to a declaration of Independence." The Continental Congress had yielded to the teachings of its experience, and directed enlistments to be made for three years, instead of for six months; but ' that " zeal for the service which was manifested in the " first moments of the War, had long begun to abate; " and though the determination to resist became more " general, that enthusiasm which prompts individuals, " voluntarily, to expose themselves to more than " equal shares of the danger and hardships to be en- " countered for the attainment of a common good "was sensibly declining" — in other words, there were more of those who were willing that somebody ^Journnl of the Provincial Congress, "Die Sabbati, 10 ho., A.M., May "18. 177(!." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 339 else than themselves should do whatever fighting might become necessary; but, on the other hand, those who were expected to do the fatigue duty and to hazard their lives, had begmi to see that the offices and the benefits to be derived from their expected labor and exposure were to be converted mainly to the benefit of others ; and their enthusiasm for " the " Rights of Man and of Englishmen," which w^as formerly proclaimed by multitudes of earnest men, with scarcely one holding back, was, also, " sensibly " declining," as Marshall has aptly said — indeed, en- listments were made only among those who were desperately poor or among those whose moral charac- ters were not unstained; and even these had to be bribed by bounties, that certain iudication that some- thing else than simple, unadulterated patriotism in- spired the act. General Washington was at New York, with the main body of the Continental Army, strengthening the defences and seeking means to prevent the passage of ships of war up the Hudson- river or, through the East-river, into the Sound; urg- ing the increase of his Army on those who did no more than call on others, as unwilling as themselves, to enter the ranks ; and begging for Arms and muni- tions of War, of which he was almost destitute, from those who had neither Arms nor munitions of War to bestow on him nor on any other. A large body of Militia, as will be seen, hereafter, was ordered into the field, for the support of the Army, to be mustered in until the close of the year; a " Flying Camp," so called, was ordered to be composed of ten thousand men from Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Marv'land ; and, on every hand, were seen the active prepara- tions, by an unwilling and bounty-bought or poverty- driven Army, to settle the dispute in which it pos- sessed no direct, if any, interest, by the arbitrament of Arms. ■ During that brief period, also, the movements of some of those who had assumed to be the leaders of the masses, throughout the several Colonies, were more frequent and more decided in their tone, in favor of Independence— movements, however, both within and without the Congress of the Continent, and more especially from the Delegations from New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland, which encountered the most determined and vigilant opposition. It were useless to pretend, with any respect for the truth, that the great body of the inhabitants of the Colonies was favorably inclined to or particularly interested in, a change in those who ruled them or in the manner of that rule, since it was perfectly evident that they would not be per- mitted to exercise any greater political authority nor to have their labors lessened nor their wants better supplied, under one than under the other form of Grovernment; or, in New York, under the administra- tion of the Livingston regime instead of that of the De Lancey, under the last of which they had hitherto lived ; but the leaders of the Rebellion, elsewhere than in New Y'ork, seeing before them a semblance of greater consequence to themselves, in the proposi- tion for Independence, were rapidly concentrating their efl[()rts to accomplish that end. The desire for such a change was, also, sometimes promoted by the consciousness, among those whose consciences had not become charred by their hankering for offices, of that evident hypocrisy in pretending to an earnest loyalty toward a monarch against whom they were waging an open and recognized public War, with which the Committees and the Congresses of the Re- bellion had continued to affront the common sense and the morality of Christendom ; and that moral in- clination to Independence, and those other inclina- tions, in the same direction, which were prompted by less holy influences, were all strengthened by the alarm which was produced by information that the Colonies had been formally declared to be in rebel- lion ; that mercenaries had been employed to assist in reducing them to subjection, in which all classes would be subjected to a common ruin — a repetition, on a larger scale, but on the other side, of what had been done, already, by the leaders of the Rebellion, in New York, against the peaceful, agricultural inhabitants of Westchester and Duchess and Queens and Richmond-counties ; that the Indians were to be employed by the Home-Government, for the pur- pose of harassing the frontiers and threatening the inland settlements and villages; and that the Slaves were to be withdrawn from their masters, as far as possible, and armed in the service of the King. All these influences had culminated in the submission to the Continental Congress of a Resolution, "That " these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, " free and independent States, that they are absolved " from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that " all political connection between them and the State " of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dis- " solved. That it is expedient forthwith to take the " most effectual measures for forming foreign Al- " liances. That a plan of Confederation be prepared " and transmitted to the respective Colonies for their " consideration and approbation." It encountered, however, the most serious opposition, among which the Livingstons and their supporters, Delegates from New York, were peculiarly conspicuous ; and, when the third Provincial Congress came to its un- timely end, it was still pending, that Delegation, as far as the paucity of its numbers went, appearing conspicuously among those who were not its sup- porters. While these various important matters were oc- cupying the attention of the Colonists, General Howe came into the harbor of New York, and occupied Staten-island with his entire command; and the inhabitants of Richmond-county, as that beautiful island was then called, politically, and as it is still called, as might have been reasonably expected, since they were still smarting under the sen- 340 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. tence of outlawry and the consequent outrages to which they had been recently subjected by the Pro- vincial Congress and its Committee of Safety, received the new-comers, it is said, " with great de- " monstrations of joy, took the Oaths of Allegiance to " the British Crown ; and embodied themselves, under "the authority of the" [Colonial'] "Governor, Tryon, *' for the defense of the Island. Strong assurances were " also received from Long Island and the neighboring "parts of New Jersey, of the favorable disposition of ''the people to the Royal Cause," it was said; and those who had been harried from their homes, and who had sought refuge in the swamps and thickets of the country, victims of the rapine and outrages of lawless and ruthless "patriots," their own country- men, quite reasonably, hastened to seek the protection of those by whom, under a more judicious policy, they would be enabled to occupy their own homes and to pursue the ordinary routine of their peaceful lives, in quietude and safety. A large and well-pro- vided force, for the reinforcement of General Howe's command, was known to be on the ocean and not distant, convoyed by a strong naval force, under the command of Admiral Howe — the latter a brother of the General and, with him, a half brother of the King — and it was already known that, thenceforth, New York would be the base of all the military and naval operations, on the Atlantic seaboard, in the next campaign. On the day after the King's forces came into the harbor, l_June 30, 1776,] after it had provided for the removal " of a'l and singular the public papers and "money" which were then in the possession of its Secretary and its Treasurer, to the White Plains, the Provincial Congress was hastily adjourned to that place, as has been already stated, in order that it might escape from the possibly sudden attack on the City, by the Royal forces — an attack by them, on the seat of the local Government of the Rebellion in the Colony of New York, and that at an early day, having evidently been a feature in the pre-constructed plans of General Howe. The anxious Provincial Congress resolved, however, that it would re-assemble at the Court-house, at the White Plains, on the following Tuesday, the second of July, to resume its official business, which was thus interrupted by the appear- ance, in the distance, of danger ; and it resolved, also, that the next Provincial Congress should meet at the same place, on the succeeding Monday, the eighth of July. In the brief Session which was thus interrupted, and which was not continued, at the White Plains or elsewhere, the third Provincial Congress continued the injudicious and unjust, to say nothing of the barbarous, outrages inflicted on those who were not inclined to accede to every measure of the Congresses and Committees, no matter how passive those Colonial Non-jurors of America might have been ; and those pains and penalties were inflicted, directly. by its own authority ; ' and indirectly, by the several local Committees;^ the Congress, meanwhile, ac- quiescing in, if not approving, the most barbarous treatment of its prisoners ; ^ winking at the barbarities practised by mobs, on those whom it had proscribed ; * 1 Journal of the Provincial Conyrets, " Die Martis, P.M., May 28, 1776 ;" the sa7ne, " Die Jovis, 9 ho., A.M., May 30, 1776 ; " Oie snme, " Die Martis, " 9 ho., A.M., June 4, 1776 ; " the same, " Die Jovis, 9 ho., A.M., June "6, 1776 ;" etc. '^Journal ofthePiovincial Congress, "DieLitDse, 4 ho., P.M.. June 3, "1776;" the same, "Die Jovis, 9 ho., A.M., June C, 1776;" the same, "Thursday morning, June 20, 1776;" the same, "Friday afternoon, "June 21, 1776 ;" etc. 2 Henry Dawkins, accused of counterfeiting, was ironed so heavily, u-Uhin the priimi, tliat he was reported to have been " injured by his irons "so that his legs swell ; " and Henry Youngs, accused of the same of- fense, also confined in the Jail, was so much injured by the irons with which he was additionally secured, that it became necessary to remove them. [Jounitil of the ProrincUtl Congress, "Friday morning. 9 ho., A.M., ".Tune, 1776;" the same, "Tuesday morning, New Tork, June 11, "1776.") * About the middle of June, 1776, mobs were raised by John Lasher, John and Joshua Hett Smith, Peter Van Zandt, and other leaders of the extreme revolutionary faction, in the City of New York, by whom sev- eral citizens who were of the Opposition, but not of the Rebellion, were seized by these revolutionary " patriots," who placed them on "sharp "rails," andcarrieil them on men's shoulders, around the City, amidst the huzzas of the mob. The progrei^s of one of these parties was said to have been stopped by General Putnam ; but not until the victim had sustained seriotis injuries, (Jones's History rif ^iew YorTi during the Uevolvtionary War, i., 101-103; de Lancey's Notes on Jones's UUti>ry, i., 596-598.) Peter Elting, a brother-in-law of Richard Varick, wiote of these trans- actions, "We had some Grand Toory Rides in this City this week & in par- " ticular yesterday. Several of them were liandeM verry Roughly Being "Caried trugh the streets on Rails, there Clooths tore from I here backs " and there Bodies pritty well mingled with the du.^t. Amongst thorn " were C , Capt. Hardenbrook, Mr. Rapllje, Mr. Queen the Poticary, "and Lessly the barber. There is hardly a toory face to be seen this "morning." {Peter Elting to Captain Richard Varicl-, "New York, 13th "June, 1776.") On the twelfth of June, in the afternoon. Generals Putnam and MitHin, who had evidently witnes.sed the outrages to which Elting alluded, "complained to the Provincial Congress of the riotous and disorderly " conduct of numbers of the inhabitants of this City, which hadledthis " day to acts of violence to\\'ards some disafie cted persons;" but what had shocked Isniel Putnam, by reason of its b arbarism, even while the "complaint" of those two Officers urged the Congress to condemn the offenders, one of whom wa.s then occupying a seat in the Congress, that body winked at, and, at the same time, it screened the offenders, and qualified the offense— its words were these : " RE.'iOI.VEn ; That this Con- " gress by no means approve of the riots that Iiave happened this day ; " they flatter themselves, however, that they have proceeded from a real "regard to Lib-rty and a detestation of those jiersons wlio, by their " language and conduct, have discovered themselves to be inimical to "the cause of America. To urge the warm friends of Liberty to de- " cency and good order, this Congress assures the public that effectual " measures shall be taken to secure the enemies of American Liberty in " this Colony, and do require the good people of this City and Colony to " desist from all Riots, and leave the offenders against so good a cauf-e to be " dealt with by the constitutional representatives i f the Colony "—the subsequently infamous " Committee to detect Conspiracies," then in em bryo, having been, undoubtedly, the "constitutional" agency referred to, {Journal of the I'rovincial Congress, "Wednesday afternoon, .lune 12, "1776.") It has been said, apologetically, that the Congress wjis intimidated ; and that the mob was the controlling power ; but the overwhelming mil- itary force which was then in the City, with General Washington at its head, indicated no such state of affairs; and it is undoubtedly true that that series of Mobs, directed by leaders of the Rebellion — one of whom, if no more, was a member of the Provincial Congre.ss— against those of the Colonists who were not of the Rebellion, was intended to give to the new-formed " Committee to detect Consiiiracies," subsequently so ob- noxious to every honorable man, a good set-off in its work of perseeutii^n and outrage. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 341 and compelling the latter to seek safety in flight.' It as=!unied judicial functions, in putting some of its victims on " trial," before itself or a Committee of its members ; sometimes it graciously absolved those whom it had seized on mere "informations;"' and, occasionally, it honored a victim of a local Com- mittee, by listening to an Appeal from the decision of that inferior tribunal,* although it was not always exempt from an appearance, at least, of partiality to the Respondent in the Case.' In the same connection, it called into existence and inaugurated the " Com- " mittee to detect Conspiracies," that powerful in- quisitorial agency of the Rebellion, in New York, whose doings will be noticed more fully, hereafter. ******** Those who had been hoist with their own petard, in becoming the speculative holders of Dutch Tea, which they had smuggled into the Colony, and which they could not, now, di.spose of, unless on terms and at prices which would have been disastrous to them, pestered the Provincial Congress with appeals for relief from the enactments of their own friends ; and some of them — one of them a member of the preced- ing Provincial Congresses, and another a Delegate of the Colony in the Continental Congress — were charged with violating those enactments, in their ' The Continental CoDgre.ss having authorized the employment of Con- tinental troops for such a purpose, a Regiment was sent to Hempstead, for the pnrp, they had no means for their de- fense, and, therefore, they fled and hid themselves in swamps, in woods, in barns, in hollow trees, in corn-fields, and in the mai-shes. Numbere took refuge in tlie pine barrens of Suffolk-county ; others, in small boats, kept sailing about the Sound, landing in the night and sleeping in the woo ; " the tame, " Tuesday morning. New York, June 11, 1776 ; " etc. ^ The Proriaciat Congress to the CommiUee of Qiieens-counlij, "In Pko- " VINCIAL CONORES-S Nf.w-York, A.M., June 11, 1776 ; " Journal of the Prorinrinl Comjress, " Thursday morning, June 27, 1770;" the same, "Die Mercurii, 9 ho., .\.M., June o, 1776." * Jimmul of the Prnrinrial Congress, "Saturday. P.M., June 1, 1776 Uie name, " Die Martis, ho., .\.M., June 4, 1776 the same, " Die Mer- " curii, 9 ho., A. M., June 5, 177G ; " the same, " Die .Tovis, 9 ho., A M., " June 6, 1776 ; " the same, " Die Luna;, 9 ho., A.M., June 10, 1776." 5 In the Api)pal of Thomas Harriot from the decision of the General Committee of the City and County of New York, the latler of whom n-ns, also, verii ei-idmlhi the Complainant in the original Case, on the sixth of June, the Provincial Congress, without any application from either party, volun- tjirily offered to give its aid to the Respondent, " for the attendance of " their witnesses," leaving the Appellant without any such favor. As might have been foreseen, in such an instance of pre-entertained par- tiality in the Appellate body, the decision which the General Committee had maile in its own Case, was sustained by the Provincial Congress ; and the .\ppeal therefrom, of Thomas Harriot, was promptly dismissed. efforts to '' work off" some portions of their stocks of the article ; but, of course, in such instances as Isaac Sears and John Alsop, the offenders sustained no evil consequences from the exposure of their commercial peccadillos.* There were other subjects, of greater general in- terest than these, which received the hurried atten- tion of that very busy body of men ; and to some of these, places in this narrative may properly be given. The first of these is that " Committee to detect "Conspiracies," already alluded to, which originated in that much talked-of " Hickey Plot," — the latter, a partisan bugbear which, before long, will descend to the low level of " the Negro Plot," in the same City of New York, in which the conspiracy against the helpless victims was greater than any which had pos- sibly existed among them, against others ; or to the lower level of that "Witchcraft" excitement, in Salem, led by clerical narrowness and bigotry, which had brought so much shame on the Mathers and on Colonial Massachusetts. Sometime between Monday morning and Tuesday afternoon, [3fay 20, 21, 1776,] — as no entry of its ap- pointment was made on the Journals of the Provincial Congress, nothing is known concerning the time nor the circumstances of the appointment, unless from in- ference" — that body appointed a Committee "to con- "sider of the ways and means to prevent the dangers " to which this Colony is exposed by its intestine "enemies." Beyond the single fact that John Alsop, one of the most determined enemies of Independence and subsequently a recognized Loyalist,^ was a mem- ber, if not the Chairman, of that Committee, there is no record of the names of those who constituted it ; and, beyond the information which was contained in its title, there is quite as much obscurity surrounding the purposes for which it was created. On Tuesday afternoon, [J/firy 21, 1776.] as we have said. Mr. .\lsop submitted (he Report of the Ctmimit- tee ; ' and it was duly debated, with several motions for amendments, until the following Friday, \_May ^ Journal of the Provincial Oaigrt'ss, "Die Mercurii, 9 ho., A.M., 3Iay "29, 1776 ; " the same, " Friday Afternoon, June 14, 1776." See, also, the Proviuci,s "safe custody Ihe said person or pei"sons so refusing, " until the next meeting of the said General Com- " mittee, with whom the accusation against the said " dangerous and disaHected person or persons ought, "forthwith, to be lodged by the Committee of tlie " Town or District by whom they may be apprehended, " sunuiu)ued, or eonuaitled, as aforesaid. "And whereas there is, in this Colony, divers " persons who, by reason of their holding Otiices from " the King of Great Britain, from their haviug neg- " lecled or refused to associate witli their fellow citi- " zens, for the defence of their common Rights, from '' their having never mariil'ested, by their conduct, a " zeal for and attacliment to the American cause, or " from their having maintained an equivocal ueutral- " ity, have been considered by their countrymen in a " suspicious light, wliereby it hath become necessary, " as well for the safety as for the satisfaction of the " people, who, in times so dangerous and critical, are " naturally led to consider those as their enemies wlio " withhold from them their aid and infiueuce : " Resolved, That the following persons, who are "generally supposed to come under the above descrip- " tion, to wit : " In the City and County of New- York. — Oliver De "Lancey, Chjis. W. Aptliorpe, William Smith, John "Harris Cruger, Jas. Jauncey, Junr., Wm. Axtell, " Goldsbrow Banyar, Geo. Brewerton, Chas. NicoU, " Gerard Walton, Donald McLean, Chas. McEvers, " Benjn. Hugget, Wm. M^ Adam, John Cruger, Ja- "cob Walton, Robert Bayard, Teter Graham, Peter "Van Schaack, Andrew Elliot, David Mathews, John "Watts, Junr., and Thomas Jones. " In Kings-county. — Augustus Van Cortlandt and " John Rapalje. "In Richmond-county. — Benjamin Seaman and " Christopher Billop. " In Queens-county. — Gabriel Ludlow, Saml. Mar- " tin, Thos. Jones,* Archd. Hamilton, David Colden, " Richd. Colden, Geo. D. Ludlow, Whitehead Hicks, " Saml. Clowes, Geo. FoUiot, Saml. Doughty, Danl. " Kissam, Gilbt. Van Wyck, John Willett, David " Brooks, Charles Hicks, John Townsend, .John Pol- " hemus, Benjn. Whitehead, Thomas Smith, John " Shoals, Nathl. Moore, Saml. Hallett, Wm. Wey- " man, Thos. Hicks, at Rockaway, Benjamin Lester. "In Wesfchestcr-county.' — Solomon Fowler^ and " Richard Morris.* ' Tliomaa Jones, one of tlio Associafo Judges of the Suproiue Court of the Colony, was the author of that exceeilingly vahiablc HisOtrij of Srw York during the Uernhitinnnrt/ U'tir, to which so inauy rcferuuces are iiuulo, ill tins narnitive. His wife, Auiic, was tlic third daughter of Chief-justice and Lieutenant-governor James I)e Laiii ey, wlii( li was hirgely the ground of liis oflence Indore the leaderx of tlie lieliclliun. -Tile siualliiesjj of the list of the jiroscrihed in \\'eslcli('ster-cuiinty may, prohahly, he accounted for by the fact that .Fudge Thomas, and Major Van Cortlandt, and the greater nuiiiher of the Colonial Ollice- hoklers, in that County, were masquerailiug, locally, with the revolu- tionary party. ^Solomon Fowler appears to have been of Eastchester. * Uicharil JIoiTis was the Judge of the Colonial Court of Adminilty 346 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " And also all sucli other persons of the like char- " acter as the said Committee may think pro])er to be " summoned hy the said Committee, to appear before " them, at such time and place as they shall appoint, " then and there to show cause, if any they have, " why they should be considered iis iriends to the " American cause, and as of the number of those who " are ready to risk their lives and fortunes in defence " of the Rights and Liberties of America, against the " usurpation, unjust claims, and cruel oppressions of " the British Parliament, which Rights and Liberties " and which unjust claims and cruel oppressions are " specified and stated in divers Addresses, Petitions, " and Resolutions of the present and late Continental " Congress, and, in default of appearance, the said " Committee, on proof made of the service of the " said Summons, are authorized and directed to cause " them to be arrested and brought before them, by " Warrant, under their handu, directed to any Militia " Officer in this Colony, who is hereby directed to ex- " ecute the same. " And if, on the aj)i)earance and examination ol " the said persons, it shall ai)pear to the satisfaction " of the said Committee that they or any of them are " friends to the American cause, that such of them " whom they shall so adjudge to be friends, be forth- " with discharged, and a Certificate thereof, under " the hands of the said Committee, given them, and " their names forthwith reported to this CJongress, " to the end that the same may be entered on their " Journals, and published, and justice thereby done " to their characters and reputations. And it is fur- " ther " Rkholvei), That all such of the said persons as " the said Committee shall not adjudge and deter- " mine to be I'riends to the American cause, the said " Committee be and they hereby are required to treat " and dispose of in the following manner, to wit : tJjo Jiiriedictiun uf whicli exteiulctl over Comiocticut, Now York, and New Jersi'y. Hia fatlier had ocfiipieil llio placo, before him ; lie had occu- pied it siiicu August 2, 17ii2 ; and ho wiis, also, Clerk of tlio Courts ol Nisi I'rivis and Ceiiural Jail Dolivery. He was a brother of Lewis Mor- ris, the Delsgato iu the Contineiitiil Congress, and of Staats Long Slorris, an officer iu the Eiiyal Army, and liuebaud of the Dowager Duchess of Gordon ; and Gnnverneiir Morris was his half-brother. Ik* w;u*, also,tlie grandfather of Lewis (i. Morris, of Kordham Heights. Although lio was cliissed, in these Resolutions, among those who occu- l)ied "an enuivocal neutrality " — ho preferred to retain his hold on the Koyal Troiisury as long as possible ; and the studied denunciation of him, in the.so Resolutions, was admirably ada|ited to secure the steady payment of bis Salary and Fees, aud to secure the family estates, in case the Rebellion should bo suppressed— just eight weeks after the presentation of this Report, ho was appointed, by the same Provincial Congress who had received and adopted this formidable series of Resolu- tions, to the Bench of the now-formed revolutionary Court of Admiralty ; anil, three years subsequently, when .John .Jay ceased to be Chief-juslice of I lie new State, this Richard Morris was aiipoiuted to succeed him, in tliat honorable aud iutluential position. lie held the latter ottii e until September, IT'JO. The controlling power among the revolutionary elements, in the Colony as well as in the new-formed State, was not slow to reward the Morris family with offices and emoluments; and the latter was ei|ually watchful of its own interests, in accepting whatever was olfered. " That such of them as may be men of influence in " the neighbourhood of the place of their present resi- " deuce, be removed to such place, in this or a ueigh- " bonring Colony, as will deprive them of an o[)por- " tuuity of exerting that infiuence to the prejudice of " the American cause, and respectively bound by " their parole or word of honour or other security, at " the discretion of the said Committee, neither di- " rectly or indirectly to oppose or contravene the " measures of the Continental Congress or the Con- " gress of this Colony, aud to abide in the place aud " within the limits so to be assigned them, till the " further order of the present or future Provincial Congress or Continental Congress ; and in case they " shall refuse to give such parole or other security, to " commit them to safe custody. " And as to such of the said persons whose removal, " in the judgment of the said Committee, shall not " appear necessary, that the said Committee do cause " them to be respectively bound with such security, " by parole or otherwise, as the said Committee shall " deem necessary, neither directly or indirectly to " oi)pose or contravene the measures of the Conli- " nental Congress of this Colony. Pko VlDED, never- " THEEESS, that the said Committee shall be and they " are hereby authorized, in case they shall, on '' iiKpiiry, find any or either of the said persons to be so dangerous as that they ought not to be admitted " to go at large, to order such of them to be kejjt in " safe custody. " Resolved, That the said Committee and the " County Committees keep a just record of all their "proceedings, in pursuance of these Resolutions, " and re[)ort the same, with the substance of the " evidence oti'ered to them, for and against the several " persons who shall be by them apprehended, sum- " moned, tried, and examined by virtue of the afore- " going Resolutions ; and that they have power to '■ send for witnesses and papers. " Resolved, That the said Committee consist of "the following gentlemen, to wit: Mr. Morris, Col. " Remsen, Mr. John Ten Broeck, Mr. Idaring, Mr. "Tredwell, Col. Lewis Graham, aud Mr. Hallett;' " aud that any five of them be a quorum; and that " before they enter on the business herein before " assigned them, they and also all such of the County " Committees as may be engaged in carrying these ■Of these, Gouverneur Morris and Lewis Graham were from West- chester-county ; Henry Romsen and Joseph Uallelt were from the City and County of New York ; John Ten Broeck was from Albany-county ; John llaring was from Orange-county ; and Thomas Tiedwoll was from Suffolk. Subseiiuently. as will be seen hereafter, Henry Renisen was excused from serving on the Committee ; and John Jay, of the City and County of New York, and John Sloss Hobarf, of Sullolk, were added to it. At a still later date, I'hilip Livingston, of the City and County of New Y'ork, was also nclded ; and Leonard Gansovoort, of Albany-county, was substituted for John Ten Broeck. After the aimmittee had become organized, jolin llaring retired from it, Thomas Randall, of New Y'ork, taking his place. .\ few days before the Congress was disbanded, Joseph Ilallett left the Couimitteo. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 347 " Resolutions into execution severally take an oath, " diligently, impartially, without fear, favour, afTec- " tion, or hope of reward, to execute and discharge " the duties imposed on them, by the aforegoing " Res(dutions. " Uksolvko, That the said Committee appoint " such persons as they may think proper, to repair to " the said Counties ' to inquire for and procure the " witnesses against the jiersona herein directed to be '■ arrested or summoned to appear, and give evidence " against the said ])ersons, before the said Committ-ee ; " and that the said persons be paid for their troul)leat " the rate of fifteen shillings for each day they shall " respectively be employed on that service ; and that " the witnesses they may direct to attend, as afore- " said, be jviiid their reasonable ex|)cnses for travelling " charges and subsistence, to be certifie It appears rrom cho wunis in the text, that Richmond, Kings, Queens, Now York, aixl Wt'stolifster-ciunitiea were all which were to be favuml with the alti-ntinii nf that revolu.ionary Tnqnisition; an(i,asfar as the iiriM!e«lini;3 of that iiitanioiis Inxly have licen iierinittfeeean that resideiitjj of other Counties were suhjected to ita despotic practices. •Juitnuil nf ttte Prtn-itu-i4il Co«|/»t.«, "Die Mercurii, 9 ho., Jtine "5, 1776." There are intern il evidonce.-i, in the twi) pa)icrs, that the Resolutions nhii h the I'lov noial Congress had adnpled, un the twenty -fourth ol Slay (/"I;/'' :M-, ttiih') and those whidi are now under consideration, were written liy .he same haiitiHHl, that that hand was \n*t .hdiu Jay's, nit some have sup puseil, hut tJouverneur MoiTis's. It is true that Ductor Siuirks made no mention of the auhject, in his Life nf Onnvunimr Mt>rri< — it was not his puriMMeto ex|K>se th.i wejikne»*es anr tlie promotion of the purposes ofintt'Uded confiscations of individual and family properties ; and, nn<)nestionaMy, riouverneur Morris was the author of it, and one of the m:ister-spirits in the execu- tion of its proviijioiia. >J>'Hrii/i/ nf llie PrvFiiiciiU Onigrfxi, "Friday Afti-rnoon, June 14, " 177fi." ^Jimrmtl nf Ihf Prurincial O'ligrfss, "Vie Sahhati, A.M., June l.";, " I77r.." > Ihid. • Ibid. being present, the Committee proceeded to the dis- charge of the duties which had been laid on it.' This secretly acting, inquisitorial body, of which John Jay was made the Chairman, held secret sessions(m the fifteenth, nineteenth, twentieth, twenty- first, twenty-second, twenty-third, twenty-fourth, twenty-fifth, twenty-sixth, twenty-seventh, and twenty-ninth of June,"* beyond which period we do not i>ropose, at this time, to follow it; and on the following day, when the Provincial Congress itself was disbanded and fled, every member of this mighty Committee, with the single exception of Gouverneur Morris, had, also, left the City." Besides receiving an anonymous information that Williiim Sutton, of Ma- maroneck, had been heard to say " that, in ca.se "Independency was declared by the Continental Con- "gre.'ss, there were three Colonels in the Service who ■' would join the Alinisterial Party ; " and the issueof Summonses to Frederic Philipse, of Yonkers, Richard i\[orris, of Scarsdale, and Samuel Merritt, of the ISTanor of Cortlandt, to appear and answer before the Committee, on the third of July ; the issue of similar Summonses to Solomon Fowler, of Eastchester, Nathaniel Underbill, of Westchester, and James Horton, Junior, and William Sutton, both of Mama- roneck, to appear and answer, on the fourth of July ; the issue of similar Summonses to Peter Come and Doctor Peter Ilnggeford, both of Westchester county, to appear and answer, on the fifth of July ; and the issue of similar Summonses to William Barker, Joshua Purdy, and Absalom Gedney, all of Westchester- county, to appear and answer, on the sixth of July," the Committee appears to have done nothing which particularly concerne, 1776." 8 The Minutes nf the atiiiiiiitlee, during the brief period which elapseil lictween the date of its organization ami that of the dis.solulion of the Provincial Congress — which, also, hy all parliamentary and statutory law, dissolved the Committee which was only its agent — arc scattered, in various places, and generally in manuscript, ami unprinted. Of the Minutes of the Meetings referred to in the text — and, in this place, we do not propose to refer to any of subseiiuent dates — carefully made copies, from the scattered (triginals, have b<'cn examined, in every instance. ^ .lones's Ili-ilnri/ nf Si-ic York tfurimj the IlefnlHtit'twrii Wnr, ii., 29fi, On that day. Judge Jones, who hail been summoned before the Com- mittee and had come to the City of New York, to answer the Summons, found only Gouverneur Morris ; and by the latter, he was |>urolcd and permitted to return to his homo, in (jueons-eounty. 1" .\n anonymous Information, forwarded by John Thomas, Junior, Chairman, " In Committke of S.^fftv, Wiiitf. Pi.ain.s, June 'JS, 177(),' among the papers of the Committee, ot the same day. Minntex nf t}ie Committee to Detect Compiruciea^ "Thursday, A.M., " June 27, 1776." '2 Those who are interested in the metho, 296 ; the forms of its li'iimiiiM, in its Miiniles of June 1!), 22, and 24, 1776; and those of its various DoniU, in its Mimitet of June 24, 25, 26, and 27, 1776. The future eulogists of John Jay and Gouveruevir Morris may advan- 348 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTEll COUNTY. improper for us to state, however, that, thirteen days after its sessions were interrupted, in tlie general panic wliich was produced by General Howe's arrival, there remained twenty-seven prisoners, con- fined in the cells in the City Hall, and forty-three, including the Mayor of the City, in those of the new Jail.' It would appear incredible that such a relentless spirit of partisan bitterness could have been enter- tained, at such a time, in such a body as the Provin- cial Congress of New York ; but the records of the Congress which clearly avowed such bitterness, and those of the Committee which it created for the pur- pose of executing its malignant enactments, to say nothing of the unwritten and other informal testimony of the terrorism which was at once revived, and the renewed activity, in persecution, of every petty Pre- cinct, District, and Town Committee, all bear ample testimony to the fact that personal animosities and partisan malignity had so entirely overwhelmed the reason and the judgment and the humanity of the aristocratic leaders of the Rebellion, in their haughty demands for uniformity of opinion as well as of practice, in religion as well as in politics,^ that not even tlve near approach of an avowed and power- ful enemy nor the severely pressing necessity of pre- paring to receive and to successfully oppose that not distant enemy could check their headlong and reckless work of arousing those, among themselves, victims of their former oppression and plunder and outrage — many of whom, nevertheless, would have remained passive spectators of the struggle — and of forcing them, in retaliation and self-defence, to become earn- est and active, if not desperate, belligerents, on the side and in sujjport of the Crown. As portions of the general subject of proscription, mention may be properly made, in this place, of two tageously read, from tbeso Miinifrti^ wliat tho80 diBtiiiguialicd lawyei'h wore nipalile of iluinp;, judicially, when tliey wore witliiu closed and closely guarded doors ; what tliey, then, regarded as olleuces hefore the law ; the nioihods which they adopted, in their inijuisitorial process ; and what their judgments were and what penalties they inllicted.. With these instiances of the capabilities of those two men before us, we have been enabled to umlorstand, more clearly than ever before, some of actions of the Chief .Instice and of the Ambassador which, previously, had needed ailditicjnal explanation. 1 I.M <)/ Pi-isniim ill llir I'ilij Hull, AV/r y„rl,; July 12, 1770, and I.i^l Pi-imiiicrs ill till- New (Imil, among the pa|>er8 of the Committee — UiMiirUiil Miiiiiiirrijih, etc. : MitiilhiuenHs Pu/im, .\xxiv., 4!in. - It will be remembered that the njiiiiimis of it.s victims, on rpiestious of Law, of Legislation, and of Political Economy, wei-e regardetl aa matters of oflence, even where no <"•( which was obnoxious had been ch.Trged against them ; and that, for those <.;»'iiiVi(w, only, in many instances, those viclims wrTe subjecti'd to punishini'nt. It will be re- membered, also, that the Icad.'rs of the liidielliou a.ssumed the right of determining when and in what manner religious services sluuild be con- ducted by the (Ihurches, in the Colonies, and those for whom Churches anil individuals should and should not offer their prayers to Almighty God. In Cimnecticiit, every Kjiiscopalian Church, except one, was closed, because the Clergy would not sidunit to the requirements con- cerning their prayers to CJod ; and in that single exception, the cour- ageous preacher maintained his relations with his Master, notwith- standing the opposition ; and the cowards did not seriously disturb him. or three instances which occurred in Westchester- county. It appears that it had become the practise of sev- eral of the local Committees — those in Westchester- county, in some instances, having been of the num- ber — of sending those who were offensive to them, without the slightest authority, revolutionary or con- servative, to the Forts in the Highlands, which were then garrisoned with Continental troops, "with orders "to the commanding Officers to keep them at hard "labor, until further orders,'' no matter what the disability of the victims to sustain such hard.ships may have been — a process concerning the propriety of which even Gencrnl Putnam, who was then the Officer in command of the Army, in the absence of General Washington, entertained some very reasonable and very clearly expressed doubts ; ^ and the Provincial Congress, in consequence of those doubts and of other considerations was constrained to countermand thf)so portions of the commitments to those Forts, which had imposed hard labor on the i)risoners.* Another instance of that spirit of persecution was seen in the movement of Egbert Benson, one of those who were controlled more by their haughty and ill- controlled wills than by any enactment of Committee or Congress or by any requirement of personal or po- litical integrity, for the employment of a local force, in the service and pay of the Colony, for the purpose of " keeping the peace and order and to sujjpress the 'disaffected in Duchess-county."^ The "requisi- '' tion," for by that expressive word the call of Benson was then known, was duly referred to the Deputations from Duchess, Westchester, and Ulster-counties, for consideration and report — Gouverneur Morris, Samuel Ilaviland, Jonathan G. Tompkins, and Lewis Gra- ham, representing Westchester-county ; ® and, on the following day, that Committee recommended the employment of one hundred men in Duclie.ss-county and fifty men in Westchester-county, " the said men " to be raised in the said Counties respectively, and "confined to the service of those Counties, and to 'continue in pay until the first day of November "next, unless sooner discharged by this or a future " Congress." ' There appears to have been a serious opposition to I lie adoption of the Report, New York City and Coun- ty leading in the opposition, but it was, nevertheless, adopted;" and, two days afterwards, [June 22, 177G,] dm frill J*lltlim» to the Provilirinl Cmnji-i-its, " HEAD-QI'AKTEItS, Nkw- " YoKK, June 3, 177fi." * Joiiniiil nf Ihij Pi-m, 4 ho., I'. M., Juno li, " 177r,." ^ Jiniriiiil of the Proriiii-itil < 'niitiri'jtn, " \Vednesday morning, June 10, "17711;" and the same, " Wednesday afternoon, June lit, 177G." ^ Jovniiil of the Proi'iiieiiil C'oiiyresit^ " Wednesday afternoon, June 19, "1770." 7 Joitniitl of the Provineial Coiiifreits, "Thui-sday morning, June 20, "177G." ^ Joiiniiil of the Provincial Onigress, "Thursday morning, June 20, " 1776." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 349 after various manipulations, in a second Committee,' by " one of the Secretaries, " ■ and by the Congress it- self,'' the subject was disposed of, in a series of Reso- lutions, which, it is said, " were unanimously ap- ' proved of." I As that entire subject relates to the local history of Westche-ster-countv, at that period, and to the e.stab- ] lishment of a military police force, in th.it County, evidently for the more effectual prosecution of the proposed operations of the recently created " Com- " niittee to detect Conspiracies " among the peaceable conservative residents of that County — as no com- plaint had been made, by any one, of the slightest breach of the peace, in that County, and as its local County Committee had ma the Cimmil'um of the .S(, " August If), 1776 ; " Juiinial of the I'roi iiicuil Courentioii, " Die Veneris, "11 ho., A.M., August 10, 1770.") ♦ The following, copied from the original manuscript, (Historical Mim untrijilx, etc.: Pflitioiis, xxxiii., llKi, 1D4,) will bo interesting to our readers, in this cvtnnection : " To nil'. IbiNoKAiu.K run Convkntion or nil'. St.M'k ok Nkw-York. " The Petition of the Lieutenant non-commissioned officers & Privates "belonging to Capt" Micah Townsend's company raised to be under the "Direction of the Committee of Westchester County, Humbly Sheweth, "That the Honorable the Provincial Congri'ss of this Colony when " they gave Instructions for raising Capt" Townsend's (Company allowed "the liieutenaiit Via. per weels, and the non commissioned officers and " privates Ss. per week in lieu of liatioiis and Subsistence. '•That at ami near the White i'lains ^which is the head Quarters of " the Company) the allowance for their subsistance does not amount to "near enough to supiiort them, they being unable to get victuals for "less than Is. i)er Meal, or to hire their lioaid at any tolerable rate but "by the week ; that your I'etitiouei-s entered the Company & Did duty "in the most busy season of the year before Si during Harvest time A " have hail a harder share of tluty than the Troops who were allowed by "your hoiKjiable House 2U Dcdiars Bounty & who have generally "received near 4(i Dollars. " Your Petitioners therefore humbly pray that your honorable House " will be pleased to increase the I'ay for their Subsistance so fur as to " enable them when they live with Frugality to support themselves by it "in the part of the County where they may reside, or be ordered. And "your Petitioners as in duty bound shall ever pray, &c. "Zephaiiiah Miller, I.,ieutenant, M'illiain Freilenborongh, " Jacob Travis, Serjent, Jonathan Ferris, " William Martin,* .Serjent, Robert Bloomer, Juu', *The Deposition of John Martinc, " of the Manor of Philipsbiirg near "the White Plains," (His/o/icu; M'timsci-ipl.i, etc.; Mi-si-tllaneous I'apcrs, XXXV., 1!73,) shows that this was William Martiue, his sou. and for drawing the Pay which was legitimately due to it.* Another instance of the spirit of jiartisan bitter- ness which prevailed, at that time, in Westchester- county, and of the unholy zeal with which the Town Committees urged forward the work of persecution and plunder, among their conservative neighbors, may be seen in the following note which was addressed by the Chairman of the Committee of the Town of Salem, in that County — that Committee which, a short time previously, had laid an embargo on Cattle intended for the supply of the inhabitants of the City of New York* — to the Provincial Congress : "to the honhle. the provincial congress, " New York : " The Committee of Salem, in Westchester-county, " liave the unhappiness of having a large number of " the inhabitants very much opposed to the measures " of the United Colonies, and numbers of them are "determined not to comply nor adopt the doings of " the Congress, which makes a great deal of trouble " for said Committee. Said Committee has adver- " tised some, obliged others to give bonds, some of " one or two hundred pounds, some of which have "forfeited their bonds and run off, and have made "considerable costs, one in jjarticular, in sending "after him. We desire to know what shall be done "with the forfeitures, and likewise how to proceed in "taking of it, and how to turn it into money if taken " in stock or whatever else, or whether or no the Con- "gress wont take the forfeitures and pay the cost; " we desire you would give us some rides and direc- " tions how to proceed. And likewise, those men "that still behave inimical, and put tiie Committees " to so much trouble, whether or no we might not "take cost of them to pay us what is reasonable for "Joshua Mead, Serjent, "Reuben Bloomer, Corp', "Thomas Brooks, Corp', "James Stiobdy, Corp', ".\ntliony Miller, Kifar, " James (Carpenter, "William Williamson, "Elven Hyot, " William Snilfon, " Moses Higons, "John Beaks, ' ' William Seaman, " Elijah Millor, Jun', " Nathan Holmes, "Samuel Lyon, Jun', " Stephen Munday, " Frederick Datin, "In Committf.e of Sakktv kok thf. Cocn'tv of Wf.stchkster > "attiik Wuitk Plains, Sept' ■2"'' 1770. J " Re.solvfi), that this Committee recommend to the hoiible the Con- 'veution of this State the reasonableness of increasing the .Subsistance ' Money for Capt" Townsend's ('ompaiiy as they are of opinion that 8s 'per week per Man is not a sufficient provision for them. "By order of the Committee, ".TipiiN Tho.mas, .Ji'N', CV/(in-THaH." "Juiinml of the Committee of Safety, "i ho., P.M., Deer. 7, 1776." ^ Vide pages 149, lOU, ante. Samuel Howell, Uriah Travis, Ju., Jonathan Finch, John Travis, James Miller, Jun', Zechejis Dilile, Absolim Hiitchiiis, Daniel J>eau, Jeremiah liit/.elle, John Mills, Jereiliab Owen, Benjamin fretenboroiigh, Thomas Ramond, John Broadstreot, Samuel Miller, Robert Merritt. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 351 " our time, for we grow weary of being called together "to deal with tories. That has been our whole busi- " nesss ever since we have been formed as a Commit- " tee ; it has cost me, in particular, not less than six " luuuired milcn riding, and I bc^lieve, at a moderate "guess, twenty or thirty dollars in cash, and I never " yet expected pay ; but I find 1 cant live so, and if " the tories make all the trouble, why ought they not " to pay all the cost, ttcutlemen, we only want or- " ders from you to take it. We have sent Mr. Ben. " Chapman to you, praying of you to send us some di- " rections on this important affair, one of the mem- " bers of this Committee. "By order of the Committee, " EZEKIEL Hawley,' Cluiifntan. " June 5th, 177(i." That letter was laid before the Provincial Con- gress, on Saturday evening, the eighth of June; and the Journal of that body states that it was " read and " liled," - the Congress itself, as will be seen in its s-ubsequent proceedings in the matter, hesitating, in view of its atrocious propositions, to give the authority which its writer had so unblusliingly solicited. With the fact before him, that the " large number ■' of the inhabitants" of the Town of Salem which was referred to, in that letter, was composed ol farmers, neighbors of the writer of it, and peacefully and industriously pursuing their usual vocations; and, with the additional fact before him, that none oi these were even pretended to have committed any other olfense, against either the King or the ('ongress, than the entertainment of political opinions which wore ditl'crciit from those entertained by Kzekiel llawley and his handful of " patriotic" confederates, thereader will be enabled to judge, with some de- gree of accuracy, concerning the really diabolical character of the letter and that of him who had written it. The number of those who were thus proscribed and w hose properties were so eagerly hankered for, was said to have been " large;" the proposed victims were " inhabitants " of Salem, and neighbors of Hawley and bis confederates ; they were (juietly pursuing their usual ruial occu|)ations, doing no harm to any one, and violating no law, although their opinions, on > Mr. Button said tliia Hawley was a grandson of Rev. Thomas llaw- l«y, I'listor of tli» Congregationul-clnirrli at Kiil{;t'l1i'IO, Cnnneoticnt ; tlial tic was Olio of tlio propi iclorF of tin' Oliliiiij; ; tliat lii' liolil a ('oiiiiiiiaisioii ill tlio Coiitiiiviital Army ; and that lie was latieii ulT liy duutli, Biiddunly, ill I7^^,S. (//iW-. /■;/•>/ ll'i«/<7ic»nM/y, origiiiiil cdiliun, i., 174 ; xdik, Stccoiiil udiliiiii, i., 7:S8.) Tlio " roiitiiieiilal " ('i^iiiiiiissioii referred to, by Mr. Bolton, was iiotliiiig oIbo than tliat of First lyioutcnant in Paplniii Triio«dalu°B Com. |iany of Colonial .Militia, "for the North End of Salem" — a local Com- pany of notoriously \pry little nccoiint, (/Wnni.« of EIn-liou nf OJficert, DeceiiitK-r 18, 177.'>, in the UUturicul iWnniwryrf*, etc. : MilUitri/ lietunit, xxvii., 245.) - Joio iinl of the Prorinciul Cotigrcst, " Die Sabbati, 6 ho. , P.M , June 8, "1776." partisan political questions, were not in accord with those which the latter professed to hold ; both, at the same time, concurring, however, in the recognition of the King ol' Great Britain as their legitimate Sove- reign; both professing to be equally and eiitiiely good and loyal subjects of that reigning Monarch ; both owing obedience to tlic Laws of the Lami ; and both, alike, recognizing the duty of that obedience,'' although only one of the two discharged that duty, in its every day practice. Against those unoffending farmers — as their accusers have shown, they were nothing else — with a malignant zeal which betrayed its selfish, puritanic origin, the writer of that letter prayed that they should be arrested; that their prop- erties, real and personal, should be seized, and cs- cheiited, and conliscateil ; that" costs" should be paid, therefrom, into the willing hands of those who shoulil have thus invaded their individual Rights — Rights which had been guaranteed to each of them, by the Con- stitution and the Laws of the land — that their homes should be violated and destroyed ; that their families should be made beggars, and be cast penniless on the world; and that, excc[)t among those who thus sought warrants to become local ilcspots, nothing else than individual and domestic misery and general devas- tation and ruin should be aimed at and obtained. Can anything more atrocious be conceived? Can those who could calmly and deliberately devise such outrages, to be inflicted on a peacel'ul community, and that community their own immediate neighbors and townsmen, be regarded as anything else than monstrosities, in human form, in which only the baser and most brutal i)assions had fouiul places? But, after all, these — the letter andtlie [lassions which had iiispireil it and the hand which had written it — were only the legitimate outcome of the barl^arous propositions which John Jiiy and CJouverneur Morris and their partisan associates, taking tidvantage of a short period of i)eculiar anxiety and of labors of more than usual variety and importance, hail letl the jaded and almost exhausted Provincial Congress, it may 3 " To do justiooeven to ivln-ls, let it here bo iiiomioiiod lliat * * * Nay, "so far wore tlioy fioiii iiitorforiiig with the law, that the .Magi.stratos " (-oiitiiiiiod in full po>«-ossioii of llio Civil poweiv and llio CoiirtH of Jiis- " tice wore open ill the usual manner until tlio lioclaratioii of liidopon- "deiice. In .Vpril Torin, 177('i, wvoral rohol tsoldiei-s were iiidiotod for "some Petty I.aiceniei<. trieil, convicted, and punisliod by ordiT of the "Court without any iiitorfeieiice of the Military; their Ollicoi-s at- " tended tin- trials, heaiil the evidoiiee, and upon their convii lion do- "clarod that ample jiistico wax done them, and thanked the Judge for " his candor and impartiality, during the course of the trials." — Jones's lIMori/ «/Xiir r„rk tbiniuj Ihr liiiMiiUminnj ir.ii-, i,, i:i7. Judge Jonos, the writer of the above paragr.ipli, wiis, at that tinio, one of the Judges of the Supronio Court of the Colony, and personally ucipi.-iinted with the facts stated. His praclioe was, in maltoi>i in which he was personally conoornod, to mention no name ; and the context cer- tainly seems to indicate that the Trial was in the City of New York ; tint the leuriK-d Kditor of that roiiiiukablo work, has stated, in the fmfcr, (ii., <1'.H.) undoubtedly on coniiK-tont authority, that the Court referred to w lis held at the White Plains, in Wosti hestor-coiinty ; and that the pre- siilingJiiilgeofthnt Court w as Thomas Jonos, the w riter of the w ork from w hich this (laragraph was taken. 352 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. have been unwittingly, to establish as the formal enactments of that revolutionary body.^ As we have said, the letter which Ezekiel Hawley, in behalf of the Committee of the Town of Salem, wrote to the Provincial Congress, was laid before that body, on Saturday evening, the eighth of June; when it was read and filed.'' On the following morning, \_Handaij, June 9, 1775,] the Congress directed the fol- lowing answer to be made to that remarkable letter : "In Provincial Congress, " New-York, June i), 177G. " Sir : " Your letter by Mr. Chapman, of the 5th inst., was " laid before the Congress, who are of opinion that " the contents require the most serious consideration, " and have directed me to acquaint you that whenever " several matters of importance for the general defense " and preservation of the Colony, now under consider- " ation, are despatched, the Committee of Salem may " be assured a proper attention will be made on their " application, the Congress not doubting that Commit- "tee will still persevere, with zeal in the cause o( "their country. " By order, " Nathaniel Woodhull, President. "To Ezekiel Hawley, E.sqk., Chairman " of the Committee of Salem, Weslchedcr." ^ Had Gouverneur Morris or John Jay been present, when the Provincial Congress received or when it answered that letter, the answer would probably have 1 Tlio imcstion of tlie extent to wlikli the several Provincial Coii- gresseB, iininthieiiceil by the outsiile iiressuiu of lionieinnde pitrtisan demonstrations or by t lie inside domination of thofse who assnined to social or intellei tnal snperiority, wonld have pven their authority for the enactiiient and execution of such violent nieaKures, against those of their fellow Colonists who did not concur in all which Wiw done by the Conti nental Congress of 1774, as we have noticed, is worthy of the examina- tion which it will some day receive at the hands of an intelligent, indus- trious, and fearless student. If we do not mistake, and we incline to the belief that wo do not, when that examination shall have been made, very much of the resiionsibiiity for the multitude of atrocious acts which were done in behalf of '* the cause of America " and of " the Liberties of America," vvill be shifted from the shoulders of sensible, but modest and less ener- getic, men, where it now rests, to those of men who are now represeiiti'il as having been incapable of such enormities. History tells of more than one instiince in which a mere handful ol enthusiasts, more or loss honest in their professions, has fiusteneil itself on a great political jiarty which entertained none of those enthusiastic dogmas which the others iissiimed to believe and maintain, and which, having thus fastened itself on the larger body, taking advantage ol favorable oiiportunities, artfully adapting itself to existing tenipei-s and circumstances, and pereistenlly— sometimes, impudently— thrusting ii self into every seat of inlluence and authority to which it could possibly gain access, has succeeded in re-mouhling the policy of the party which it has invaded ; and made it appear to bo what, originally, it was not ; to maintain opinions which, originally, it disclainieil and opposeil ; and to do, or permit to be done, in its name, what, originally, it would have honestly shrunk from, iis improper and unjust. Such an iiistJince, if we do not mistaki', occurred in this Colony, in 177.') anil 177(; : wi' wi re pel-- soiially acquainted with a similar instance, vastly more impurtant in its coiiseiiuences than the other, which occurred within the United States, at a comparatively recent date. 2 Vide page .351 , ante. 3Jo'inial of the ProeincUd OiiKjress, " Sunday morning, .June 9, 177C." been of a different tenor ; but Jolin Morin Scott, who was present on both occasions, and whose master mind probably controlled, wisely halted, and evidently induced the Congress to halt, in the work of pro- posed persecution and devasttition and ruin. The Committee of Stilem was coldly dismissed, without even a word of symiiathy ; and the Provincial Con- gress paid HQ further attention to the subject. With a persistency which was worthy of a better purpose, notwithstanding the rebuke which the Pro- vincial Congress had thus administered, the Commit- tee at Salem was not disposed to be thus relegated to the obscurity of a rural Town ; and, subsequently, two other letters, relating to the same general subject of " the disaffected persons who were under bonds to " that Committee," were addressed by it, to the Con- gress. The first of these letters is in these words : " Gentlemen : " As our civil and religious j)rivileges all lie at " stake, we that are friends thereto desire to lend a " lifting hand in trying to preserve them ; and as the " tories grow more and more disaffected, and are daily " going off on to Long island — four men last week " from my neighborhooil, several more from other " parts, Capt. Theal and his sou John Lobdiu, and " Stephea Delance " [Z>e Lancey ?'\ " some of them "laid under £500. bonds and also the solemnity of an " oath — but they regtird not any thing the Comuiit- " tee does with them, so long as they have their lib- '• erty. It is supposed numbers are concealed on " Long island. Please to take it into your wise cou- "sideration, whether or no it will not be best to send " and purge Long island ; and as I wrote to you a "little back by Mr. Chapman, one of the members of " Sak'in Committee, U) know what we should do with " those that forfeit their bonds, and how we should "get i)ay for the last, as there is since many more, we " should be glad of an answer. " By order of the Committee, " Ezekiel Hawley, Chairman. "Salem, June 22d, 1776. 'To THE Honourable the Pbovincial Conoress " OF New-York." * Two days after that letter was written, [June 24, 1770,] the Sul)-coiniuittees of Cortlandt and Salem united in the following letter, also addressed to the Proviiicitil Congress ; aiul in order to expedite the consideration of the subject to which it was devoted, by that body, E/ekiel H:iwley was formally directed to forward it, witii all convenient speed." "Salem, 24th of June, 177(i. " Gentlemen : " Whereas sundry persons of note have lately ab- "sconded from our part of the country, and we have " reiison to think, from several circumstances, are " (with numbers of others) assembling together on ^ Jutinttil of the Proi'incUfI Coiitjress : Correspoud^nve, ii., lUtJ, 197. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 353 " Loug island, witli a view to join the Ministerial "Army, we beg the Congress would take the matter " under consideration, and ad()])b such measures as to '• youshall appear most proper for the removal of such " dangerous assemblages, who we fear are forming " a combination to aid and assist the Ministerial Army " when an opportunity shall permit. " Ordered, That the same be forwarded with all " convenient speed by Mr. Ezekiel Halley. " By the joint order of the Sub-committees of the " manor of Cortlandt and Salem. " Ezekiel Halley, " Joseph Benedict, " Chairmen. " To THE Honourable the Pbovincial Con- gress." ' These two letters were presented to the Provincial Congress, on the afternoon of the twenty-fourth of June; read before that body ; and ordered " to remain "for further consideration; " ^ and there, as far as we have knowledge, they have remained, from that day until this — the Provincial Congress certainly paid no further attention to them. Closely connected with it, if it was not really the basis of that policy of proscription and persecution and devastation which peculiarly distinguished the entire series of Provincial Congresses and Committees of Safety of the Colony of New York, as well as the early Conventions and Legislatures of the State, after the Colony had ceased to exist, was the series of Tests, known as Associations, which were enacted, first, by the Continental Congress of 1774 and, subsequently, in various forms, by the Provincial Congresses of New York, b^" the latter of whom and by their several Committees of Safety they were, also, rigidly en- forced, as we have seen, in other portions of this narrative. One of these Tests, or Associations, adopted by a Provincial Committee of Safety, was proved to have been so etitirely subversive of the j)ersonal Rights of those to whom it was oflered, that numbers who had previously favored or acquiesced in the Rebellion, peremptorily declined to sign it, preferring rather to be considered as disaflected and to be disarmed, as such,' and to suffer all the other pains and penalties and insults tf) which those who were known as " dis- " affected " were continually subjected. The disaffection referred to must have been quite extended, seriously impairing the prospects of a polit- ical uniformity throughout the Colony, to which the leaders of the Rebellion had constantly aspired, or the Provincial Congress would not have turned aside from its daily routine to have noticed it. As it had reached ' Journal of Oie Provincinl Congrea: Gorreapondetice, ii., 197. * Journal of the Provincial Oongrut, "Monday afternoon, June 24, "1776." 'Recito/ in the Preamble of the new Association, adopted by tlie Pro- vincial Congress, on the twentieth of June, 1776. 29 those proportions which entitled it to respect, how- ever, on the eighteenth of June, three days after the organization of "the Committee to detect Conspir- " acies," the Provincial Congress adopted the following Resolution, on the subject : " Whereas doubts have arisen respecting the true " construction of a certain Association ordered by the " late Committee of Safety of this Colony, to be pre- " sented for subscription to the inhabitants thereof : " Resolved, That all doubts respecting the true " construction of the said Association ought to be re- " moved ; and that a Committee be appointed to " prepare and report a Resolution for that purpose." * On the twentieth of June, the Committee which had been appointed to consider the subject — a Com- mittee composed of Thomas Tredwell and John Sloss Hobart, of Suffolk, and John Jay, of the City of New York, all of whom were distinguished for their rigid and intense partisan feelings — submitted its Report, evidently the work of John Jay, by whom it was pre- sented. As it was intended to be submitted to the inhabitants of Westchester-county, and to be em- ployed as the basis of fresh outrages against their persons and properties, it may properly find a place in this narrative: " In Provincial Congress, " New-York, June 20, 1776. " Whereas, the Continental Congress, on the " fourteenth day of March last, did recommend to the " several Assemblies, Conventions, and Councils or " Committees of Safety of the United Colonies, im- " mediately to cause all persons to be disarmed within " their respective Colonies, who were notoriously dis- " affected to the cause of America, or had not associ- " ated, and refused to associate to defend, by arms, " these United Colonies, against the hostile attempts " of the British Fleets and Armies : " And, whereas, the late Committee of Safety of " this Colony did, thereupon, on the twenty-seventh " day of March aforesaid, recommend it to the Com- " mittees of the several Cities, Counties, Manors, " Townships, Precincts, and Districts in this Colony, " forthwith, to cause to be disarmed, all persons " within their respective districts, who were known " to be disaffected to the cause of America, and also " all such persons as should refuse to sign the foUow- " ing Association, viz. : " ' We, the subscribers, inhabitants of .... , " ' in the County of , and Colony " ' of New York, do voluntarily and solemnly engage, " ' under all the ties held sacred among mankind, at " ' the risk of our lives and fortunes, to defend, by " ' arms, the United American Colonies, against the " ' hostile attempts of the British Fleets and Armies, " ' until the present unhappy controversy between " ' the two Countries shall be settled.' * Journal of the Provincial Congress, "Tuesday morning, June 18, 1776." 354 HISTOKY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. "And whereas it hath been objected to the said " form of an Association, that, by obliging the sub- "scribers or associators, in such general and express " terms, to defend the United Colonies, by arms, "against the hostile attempts of the British Fleets " and Armies, it deprived them of the Rights reserved " by the Militia Regulations, and imposed on them the " necessity of marching to the most distant of the "Colonies, whenever called upon, which construction " of the said Association, however nice and casuistical, " is inconsistent and fallacious, it being manifest that " the Militia Regulations co\x\A, by no rules of construc- " tion, be supposed to be repealed and abrogated by " any subtle implications drawn from the said Associ- "tion. But, as some of the friends to the American " cause have been influenced, by this objection, to " refuse signing the said Association, and, in conse- " quence thereof, been disarmed, it hath become ex- "pedient that the said Association should be so ex- " plained as to render it free from specious as well as "solid objections; and, therefore, " Resolved, unanimottsly, That nothing in the "said Association contained, shall extend or be con- "strued to extend to deprive those who have sub- " scribed it of any Rights reserved to them, in and by " the said Militia Regulations ; and to the end that all " the Freemen of this Colony may associate for the "preservation of American liberty, in a form entirely " unexceptionable ; "Resolved, unanimously, That the following " form of an Association be and it is hereby recom- " mended to them, viz. : " ' We, the subscribers, inhabitants of . . . . , " 'in the County of and Colony of New " ' York, do most solemnly declare that the claims of " 'the British Parliament to bind, at their discretion, "' the people of the United Colonies in America, in " ' all cases whatsoever, are, in our opinions, absurd, "'unjust, and tyrannical; and that the hostile at- " ' tempts of their Fleets and Armies to enforce sub- " ' mission to those wicked and ridiculous claims " ' ought to be resisted by arms. " ' And, therefore, we do engage and associate, " ' under all the ties which we respectively hold '•' ' sacred, to defend, by arms, these United Colonies, " ' against the said hostile attempts, agreeable to such " ' Laws and Regulations as our Representatives in " ' the Congresses or future General Assemblies of " ' this Colony have or shall, for that purpose, make " ' and establish.' " And that all persons who have been disarmed for '• refusing to associate with their countrymen, for the " defense of the United Colonies, in the form pre- " scribed by the late Committee of Safety, as afore- " said, may have no pretence to complain of injus- " tice, and that they may have a fair opportunity of " convincing the public that their refusal to sign the " said Association did not arise from a disinclination " to defend the Rights of America, but merely from " objections to sign to the form of the said Association, " and thereby be restored to the privilege of bearing " arms in support of a cause so important and so " glorious ; " Resolved, unanimously. That all persons, " other than those whom the Committees of the sev- " eral Counties shall adjudge to be notoriously disaf- " fected to the American cause, who have not asso- " ciated in the form prescribed by the late Committee "of Safety, as aforesaid, be called upon, by persons " to be appointed by the said Committees of the sev- " eral Counties, and requested to subscribe the Asso- " ciation contained and recommended in and by these " Resolutions. And " Resolved, further. That all such of the said " persons as shall subscribe the same, other than " notoriously disaffected persons, as aforesaid, ought " to be considered and treated as friends to their "country; and that all arms taken from them and " not disposed of to the Continental troops, be re- " stored to them ; and that care be taken that they " respectively be paid the full price allowed, for such " of their arms as may have been delivered to the " Continental troops, as aforesaid. " And further, that all such of the said persons " as shall refuse to subscribe to the same, together " with all notorious disaffected persons, be forthwith, " if not already done, disarmed, and required on oath " to declare and discover whether the arms so to be " taken from them be all the arms they respectively " have or had, and if not, where the residue thereof, " to the best of their knowledge and belief, are depos- " ited and may be found ; and that such of them as " shall refuse to take such oath, be committed to s^afe " custody till they will consent to take it. • " Resolved, unanimously, That it be and it is " hereby recommended to the Committees of the sev- " eral Counties in this Colony, to carry the aforesaid " Resolutions into execution, with diligence and " punctuality.'" It is said that the Report and Resolutions were unanimously adopted by the Provincial Congress, evidently without the slightest consideration of their characters and probable result, and certainly during the latter portion of an afternoon session of the Con- gress, in which, both before and after the presenta- tion of them, that body was crowded with other and very important matters of business ; and it is said to have ordered, at that time, that the Resolutions should be printed in all the newspapers which were then published in the City of New York and in hand- bills ; and " that the Resolutions be read to every " person to whom the Association thereby recom- " mended shall be offered for subscription." ^ Whatever the real motives of those who had de- l Journal of the Provincial Cotujress, "Thured.iy Afternoon, June 20, "1776." = Ibid. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 355 clined to sign the Association which the Committee of Safety had prescribed, had been, they were such as had led the Provincial Congress to notice them, respectfully, and to lead that body to move for the re- moval of the objections which had been thus reasona- bly raised against that Association, by those whom the Provincial Congress's Committee was constrained to recognize as " friends to the American cause ; " and it ill became John Jay, therefore, to display so many of the idiosyncrasies of his generally unamiable character, in the contemptuous and singularly insult- ing words which he applied to those of his fellow " friends of the American cause" who had presumed to take their kno\vledge of the legal obligations con- tained in that objectionable Association from some one else than from himself and his Congressional con- frerie ; and an impartial examination of the two forms of Association, and a caretiil comparison of that revised form, which he induced the Provincial Con- gress to substitute for that against which the objec- tions had been raised, with the latter, will clearly indicate to the reader that the writer of that revised form had permitted his evil passions to get the better of his personal integrity, when he belittled himself by reporting an Association which was even more objectionable in its provisions than that which had been objected to, dressed and decorated with a meaningless Preamble, evidently intended for the beguilement of the unwary, but without containing a single word of provision, either in the Preamble or in the Association itself, that the signers of that revised instrument, by that act, would not deprive themselves of their Eights as Militia, and subject themselves to be taken beyond the limits of the Colony, even to the extoot of the most distant of the confederated Colonies, whenever some body, over whom they could exercise no control, should incline to order them thither. Indeed, instead of relieving the Asso- ciation which the Committee of Safety had recom- mended, from the uncertainties of its provisions, the only duty which had been assigned to John Jay and his two rustic associates, these astute partisans, in the bitterness of their animosities, did nothing else, in the way of the duty which had devolved on them, than to indulge in contemptuous sneers and inuen- does against those who had objected to the terms of the Committee of Safety's Association, without includ- ing, in their revised form, the provisions of safety which the Provincial Congress had evidently intended to have inserted; and, by the addition of words which were not in the former, they actually made the signers of the revised Association, more than before, the helpless subjects of two absolutely despotic bodies, over neither of whom could they bring any, even the slightest, restraining influence, no matter how objectionable and oppressive the Orders and enactments of either or both of those bodies might be. As a man thinketh in his heart, so he is; and it will be difficult, in the light of such actions as this, to convince any honest man that, whatever he may have been after he had reached that place in the office-bearing ranks of his countrymen which he so greatly coveted and of which he was so exceeding fond, while John Jay was still struggling for place, it mattered little under what master, he was neither more nor less upright, in what he said and did for the advancement of his individual or his party's purposes, than are office-seekers of our own day, with whom the end in view is generally made to justify the means. On the twenty-sixth of June, the Provincial Con- gress received a letter from the President of the Continental Congress, dated on the preceding day, and enclosing a Resolution of that body,' the latter of which, because of its remarkable character, is entitled to a passing notice, in this place. The Reso- lution referred to was in these words : " In Congress, June 24, 1776. " Resolved, That all persons abiding within any " of the United Colonies and deriving protection from " the Laws of the same, owe allegiance to the said " Laws and are members of such Colony ; and that all "persons passing through, visiting, or making a tem- " porary stay in any of the said Colonies, being en- " titled to the protection of the Laws during the time "of such passage, visitation, or temporary stay, owe, "during the same time, allegiance thereto. "That all persons, members of or owing allegiance " to any of the United Colonies, as before described, " who shall levy war against any of the said Colonies, " within the same, or be adherent to the King of Great " Britain or others, the enemies of the said Colonies, or " any of them, within the same, giving to him or them "aid or comfort, are guilty of treason against such " Colony. "That it be recommended to the Legislatures of " the several United Colonies to pass Laws for punish- " ing, in such manner as to them shall seem fit, such " persons, as before described, as shall be proveably "attainted of open deed, by people of their condi- "tions, of any of the treasons before described. " That it be recommended to the Legislatures of "the several United Colonies, to pass Laws for pun- "ishing, in such manner as they shall think fit, per- " sons who shall counterfeit, or aid or abet in coun- "terfeiting, the Continental Bills of Credit, or who "shall pass any such Bill, in payment, knowing the "same to be counterfeit. " By order of Congress, " John Hancock, President." ' The Journal of the Continental Congress tells us that this remarkable paper formed a part of the Report of the Committee on Spies, to that body ; and that Com- 1 Journal of Die ProviHcial CongreM, "Wednesday morning, June 26, " 1776." s Journal of Ihe Provincial CongreM: Correspondence, ii., 196. See, also, Journal of the Continental Congrete, "Monday, June 24, " 1776." 356 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. mittee appears to have been composed of John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Edward Rutledge, James Wilson, and Robert R. Livingston ;^ but the character of those who framed the Resolution only increases our surprise, and, more clearly than before, indicates the desperate straits into which, even at that early date, the Continental Congress had been crowded, unless the "spies " against whom the Committee ful- minated its Report were those Commissioners whom the Ministry had authorized to treat for Reconcilation and PeacCj^ and who were, at that time, nearing and not distant from New York ; and unless, also, the Con- tinental Congress, by these Resolutions, proposed to naturalize Admiral Howe, and General Howe, and the forces which were respectively under their com- mand; and to transform ail these, on their arrival within the harbor of New York, into " members of " the Colony " of New York, " owing allegiance to " the Laws of the United Colonies," and subject to be tried on a charge of " Treason against such Colony " of New York, should they become prisoners of war. Whatever the purposes of the Continental Congress may have been, in the adoption and promulgation of these Resolutions, no one can attribute to the learned lawyers who reported them the slightest sincerity, since none knew better than they, that "allegiance," under any possible circumstances, was not and could not become due to what was nothing else than a mere " Law," and that the " Law " of a mere " Colony," w'hich might be enacted on one day and be repealed on the next; that "allegiance" was, tiien, and would always be, due to nothing else than to the Sovereign of whom the person was or should become, legiti- mately, a subject; that an avowed sojourner, " pass- " ing through" a Colony or merely "visiting" it or "making a temporary stay" within it, at the same time owing "allegiance" to the Sovereign of another country, while he would certainly owe obedience to the local Law, during the entire period of his journey through or of his visit to or of his temporary stay ■within that Colony, by no Law nor by any possible interpretation of a Law which would have been en- titled to the slightest respect, only by reason of that journey or visit or temporary stay, could have been said to have surrendered his "allegiance" due only to his own Sovereign, and, instead, only for the same reason, to have become a subject of, owing "alle- "giance" to, the authority which controlled the place of his journey or visit or temporary stay, and espe- cially so while that place was or should continue to be only an acknowledged dependency of a foreign Prince, to whom it was or should be, itself, avowedly subject, and by whom no such enactment or order had 1 Journal of the Continental Congress, "Wednesday, June 5, 1776." 2 " According to the noble Lord's explanation, Lord Howe and his ** brotlier are to be Bent as Spies, not as Commissioners ; that if they can- " not go on shore, they are to soiind upon the coast." — (Speech of Charles Jamts Fox, on the Motion for Lord Howes Ju-^triu-li^ms, " House ok Com- " MuNs, Wednesday, May 22, 17"6.") been made; that no mere Colony, dependent on another and superior political power, could possibly have been said, sincerely, by such a Committee, to have possessed a political Sovereignty, nor that, in the absence of such a Sovereignty, there could possibly have been a respectable and competent charge of Treason against it, in any instance w^hatever; and, more than all, that such a pretense and threat of charges of Treason against a Colony, made by the Committee, in its Resolutions, was simply a harmless thunderbolt, before the Law, since the King of Great Britain, against whom and against whose authority the Resolutions were specifically directed, was, at the time of the adoption and promulgation of those Res- olutions, actually the Sovereign of all those Colonies and of all those who were thus denouncing him, openly and generally recognized, throughout the for- mer, as the source of all their legitimate political authority and as their King; and, by the members of that Committee and the authors oftho.se Resolutions, themselves, specifically recognized as the Sovereign to whom each and every of them was himself proud to owe allegiance.' "Allegiance" and "Treason" presupposed Sov- ereignly existing in the Colonies, without which Sov- ereignty there could not have possibly been any "Allegiance" due to either of them nor "Treason" committed against them or either of them ; but it would require a bold man, possessed of a very vivid imagination, to maintain, seriously and honestly, that any such Sovereignty existed in the Colonies, or in any or either of them, on the twenty-fourth of June, 1776, when the Continental Congress adopted these Resolutions, whatever there might have been or not have been, in the several States, a fortnight after- wards. What the result of this action of the Continental Congress was, will be seen, hereafter. Another very important subject which was intro- duced to the notice of the third Provincial Congress, during its very brief existence, was that of supplant- ing the existing Colonial Government by the estab- lishment of a new form of Government which would more nearly represent the current spirit of those who were leaders in the Rebellion, and which, more than anything else, would indicate a determination to sever the political connection of the Colony with the Mother Country. On the tenth of May, 177G, the Continental Con- gress, after a very severe and very protracted consid- eration of the subject, had adopted a Resolution;* and on the fifteenth of the same month, it had pre- 3 See, in the Address to the King, by the same Continental Congress and signed by each of its members, individually, {Journal of the Continental Congress, "Saturday, .Tuly 8, 1775,'") what, at the date of these Kesolu- tions, contained, unaltered, all which had 'ten said, foruially, of the disposition, Inward the King, of either the Congress or of its individual members. < Jourmtl of the Coutinental Congress, " Friday, May 10, 177G." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 357 fixed to that Resolution, a Preamble,* which, together, were in these words : " Whereas his Britannic Majesty, in conjunction " with the Lords and Commons of Great Britain, has, " by a late Act of Parliament, excluded the inhabi- " tants of these United Colonies from the protection " of his Crown ; "AxD WHEREAS no answer whatever to the humble " Petition of the Colonies, for redress of grievances and "reconciliation with Great Britain, has been or is " likely to be given, but the whole force of that King- " dom, aided by foreign mercenaries, is to be exerted " for the destruction of the good people of these Col- " onies ; " And WHEREAS it appears absolutely irreconcilable " to reason and good conscience for the people of these " Colonies, now, to take the Oaths and Affirmations " necessary for the support of any Government under " the Crown of Great Britain, and it is necessary that " the exercise of every kind of authority under the "said Crown should be totally suppressed, and all the "powers of Government exerted under the authority " of the people of the Colonies, for the preservation of " internal peace, virtue, and good order, as well as for " the defence of their lives, liberties, and properties, "against the hostile invasions and cruel depredations "of their enemies, therefore " Resolved, That it be recommended to the re- " spective Assemblies and Conventions of the United " Colonies, where no Government sufficient to the "exigencies of their affairs hath been hitherto estab- " lished, to adopt such Government as shall, in the " o])inion of the representatives of the people, best " conduce to the happiness and safety of their constit- " uents, in particular, and America, in general.' The careful reader of that Preamble and Resolution will not fail to see, in every portion of them, only In- dependence very thinly disguised ; ^ and he will not be surprised to learn that those, within the Conti- nental Congress, who were most desirous of effecting a Reconciliation with the Mother Country, were most resolute in opposing the adoption of them ; ^ nor > Journal of the Continental Congreti, " Wednesday, May 15, 1776." ' " Great Britain has at last driven America to the last step : a com- plete separation from her, a total, absolute Independence, not only " of her Parlinnient, but of her Crown, for such is the amount of the " Resolve of the 15th. Confederation among ourselves or .\lliauce8 " with foreign nations are not necessary to a perfect separation from " Britain ; that is effected by extinguishing all authority under the " Crown, Parliament, and Nation, as the Resolution for instituting " Governments has done, to all intents and purposes. Confederation " will be necessary fur our internal concord, and Alliances may be "so for our external defense." — (John Albid. » It waa stated iu the Ciedentiald of the Deputies fiom Orange-county that (lie Resolutions of thesecoud I'ruvincial Congress, providing for the election of the third Provincial Congress and defining ils authority, were adopteil on the twelfth of March preceding; but there is no mention of the adoption of any Resolutions whatever, on that subject, on that or any otherday, ou the published Journal of the secoud Prorincial Congress. Again : we have not found on that Journal, any definition of the au- thority of the third of those Congresses — that authority which, in the text, the Secrctarv- is said to have read, on the afternoon of the tenth of June — but the Credentials of the Deputies from Kings-county, compared with those of the Deputies from Orange-county, indicate that the author- ity sought to be delegated to that third Provincial Congress by its con- stituent Counties, under the Resolutions providing for their election, included "full powers, iu behalf of the said County, to appoint Delegates "to represent the Colony in the Continental Congress, and to make such " orders and take such measures as they shall judge necessary, not repug- '•nant to or inconsistent with any Rules or Orders of the Continental "Congres), for the preservation of the Rights, Liberties and Privileges of "the inhabitants of this Colony." The.se, or their equivalents, were, undoubtedly, what the Secretary read to the Provincial Congress, as stated in the text. "The powers of the Delegates at Continental Congress," which until it became convenient to refer to them In order to promote a selfish end 30 effort to make haste slowly, in spending "some time, "in the consideration of the letter" of the Delega- tion,* without, however, taking any action whatever, ou it or on the subject to which it jeferred. Nothing whatever was done by the Provincial Con- gress, concerning the letter of the Delegates nor con- cerning Independence, on the following morning, [June 11, 1776;]" but, during the afternoon of that day, with that peculiar disregard for those with whom he was associated which invariablj- distinguished John Jay from all others, that Deputy presented "several Resolutions on the subject of Independ- "ence," which were seconded by Colonel Henry Remsen, of the City of New York, "again read by "paragraphs, amended, and agreed to, and are in the "words following, to wit:' "Resolved, unanimously. That the good people "of this Colony have not, in the opinion of this "Congress, authorized this Congress or the Delegates "of this Colony in the Continental Congress to de- "clare this Colony to be and continue independent of "the Crown of Great Britain. " But whereas the perseverance of the British " King and Parliament, in an unjustifiable attempt to "subjugate and enslave these United Colonies, may " render a determination on that and many other im- " portant points highly necessary and expedient, and " a recurrence to the people at large, for their senti- "ments on every great question that may occur iu "the course of the present contest would be very " inconvenient to them, and probably be attended " with dangerous delay : " Resolved, unanimously, therefore. That it be " and it is hereby earnestly recommended to all the " Freeholders and other Electors in this Colony, at "the ensuing Election to be held in pursuance of a "Resolution of the Congress of the thirty-first day of " May last past, not only to vest their Representa- "tives or Deputies with the powei-s therein men- " tioned, but also with full power to deliberate and " determine on every question whatever that may " concern or affect the interest of this Colony, and to " conclude upon, ordain, and execute every act and "measure which, to them, shall appear conducive to " the happiness, security, and welfare of this Colony ; " and that they hold and exercise the said powers until " the second Tuesday of May next, or until a regular "form of Government for this Colony shall be estab- had remained unnoticed, were recited in their Credentials, in the follow- ing few words : * * * " to meet the Delegates from the other Colo- " nies, and to concert and determine upon such measures as shall be "judged most effectual for the preservation and re-establisliment of " American rights and privileges, and for the restoration of harmony "between Great Britain and the Colonies," {Journal of the Prorincial Convention. '• Die Sabbati, 11 hora, A.M., .\pril 22, 1775; Journal of the Continental Congress, "Thursday, May 11, 1775.") ^Journal of the Prorincial Congress, " Monday, 5 P.M., June 10, 1776." * Journal of the Provincial Congress, ' ' Tues Ibid. « Vide imge 278, ante. iod, while neither pay nor emoluments were derivable from them, it ia very evident that that Brigadier- general and that Major of Brigade became a " neces- "sity," very suddenly, and only when a contingent possibility appeared that they, if they were already in place, might receive the appointments to the new- created offices of the same respective ranks, in the Brigade of Militia which the Continental Congress had called into the service of the Continent, with the honors, the pay, the emoluments, and the increased social and political influences which they would cer- tainly ensure. Not a moment was lost, therefore — the Congress was not even permitted to refer the letter from the President of the Continental Congress and the exceedingly important enclosures which it covered, to a Committee, for consideration and report — when, with indecent haste, some ready made Cer- tificates which had evidently been kept on hand, ready for immediate use, whenever they should be needed, were laid before the Provincial Congress, showing that, in the opinion of the enlightened County Committee, in Westchester-county, Lewis Morris was just the man for a Brigadier-general's command, and that Lewis Morris, Junior, could not be excelled as a Major of Brigade. With such in- telligent judges of military matters and of the re- quirements of those who were to command and handle large bodies of soldiers, as were seen in the rustic Committee of the County of Westchester, 1776-77, and with Gouverneur Morris, the step-brother and uncle of the two ambitious Westchesterians, present, and directing the work, how could the Provincial Con- gress do less than to elect them? The record says, "the Congress conceive it necessary towards carrying " these Resolutions of the Continental Congress into "execution, to appoint a Brigadier-general and a " Major of Brigade of the Militia of Westchester- " county ; and Lewis Morris, Esqr., being thought the "most proper person for a Brigadier-general of the " Militia of that Count}',' and having been recom- " mended by the County Committee, for that pur- " pose, and Lewis Morris, Junior, Estjr., having been " also formerly recommended by the said Committee " for an appointment, to be the Major of Brigade of " the Militia of that County ; " Resolved : That Lewis Morris, Esqr., be ap- " pointed Brigadier-general of the Militia of the " County of Westchester, and that Lewis jMorris, " Junr., Esqr., be appointed Major of Brigade of ihe " Militia of the said County." The Secretaries were ordered to engross the Com- missions; and that, properly attested, those Commis- sions be " sent to those gentlemen with all possible ' As the Militia Bill which the Prorincial Congress had adopted on the twenty-second of August, 1775, bad massed " the Jlilitia of the Counties "of Duchess and Westchester" [inio] "one otiier Brigade," it would seem that Duchess-county ought to have been consulted, in this mat- ter; but, very evidently, it was not. 366 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY " despatch," * although the Offices were only those of the Militia, not in active service and, with a small ex- ception, not likely to be so. The " despatch " was " necessary," however, since a full-fledged Brigadier- general would be a more imposing candidate, when the election should be held for the Brigadier-general of the four Battalions who had been culled into the service of the Continent ; and it was not a character- istic of the Morris family to be backward when its own interests required attention and action, at the front. We shall see, hereafter, how well this well-laid scheme was counter-schemed by more astute aspirants; how General Lewis Morris reaped all his military honors, what there were of them, in the Militia of Westchester-county ;^ and that Brigade-major Lewis Morris, Junior, secured all the laurels which he possessed, as an Aide of General Greene, a place for which he was indebted to the personal favor of that Officer. Two days after the unseemly movement of the Morrises, [June 9, 1776,] the Provincial Congress pro- ceeded to the election of a Brigadier-general for the command of the three thousand men who had been called from the Militia of New York, for the rein- forcement of the Continental Army, under General Washington, who was then in that Colony ; but General Lewis Morris, notwithstanding his artful- ness^ — that species of " art " of which his step-brother, Gouverneur, had written to Mr. Penn, in May, 1774 — was not even mentioned — even Westchester- county indicated that he was not a favorite, beyond a known limit; and its Deputation in the Provincial Congress did not jjander to his inordinate ambition. The canviiss was, indeed, confined to two candidates, John Morin Scott, of the Citj' of New York, one of that celebrated "triumvirate" of the earlier periods of the Revolution and a lawyer of the highest stand- ing, and " General " ^ Nathaniel Woodhull, of Suffolk, a veteran of the French and Indian War, and, at the time now under notice, President of the Provincial 1 Journal of the Provincial Congrest, " Friday morning, 9 ho , June 7, "1770." 2 Bolton said Lewis Morris was "a Brigadier-general in tbe Conti- *' neiitJil Army;'' and in his arrangement of the words, if they mean anything, that he held that Office before he was sent to the Continental Coiigress of 1775, {Histori/ nj Wcflchesler couiiti/ , original edition, ii., 312 ; (lie Slime, second edition, ii., 428 ; ) but we find no competent evidence of the truth uf the former statement ; and evidence is not necessary to show the entire untnith of the latter. 5 Nathaniel Woodhull appeal's to have been a Colonel of the Suffolk Militia, who was "reconunended or nominated to our Deputies in Pro- "viucial Congress for a Brigadier-general," by the Committees of the western Tow ns in Suffolk, in a meeting held at Smithtown, on the sev- enth of .Sei)tember, 1775, {Hiytorical Manuscripts^ etc.: MUituri/ lietnnis, xxvi., 216 ;) but a very careful examination of the JonrimU of the Pro- vinci^d Conijre^s and of its Committee of Safety^ from that date until the earliest mention of him as a " Brigadier general " which we have seen, has failed to produce the slightest evidence of his election to that or any other military authority, beyond his Colonelcy. We incline to the opinion, therefore, that, although he commanded the Suffolk and Queens I^lilitia, it was only as the senior Colonel, or ftolonel-comraandant; and that he was only a "Gejieral," " by courtesy," as it was called. Congress. The canvass was evidently conducted, as we have already stated, with spirit ; but the influence of the Counties of Westchester, New York, Tryon, Charlotte, and Albany, in behalf of Scott, was too great to be overcome by that of the Counties of Orange, Suffolk, Duchess, and Ulster, for Woodhull, the Counties of Richmond, Kings, Queens, Cumber- land, and Gloucester having been absent ; and the former was thus elected,* admirably filling the political demand, but not, in the slightest degree, promising to make the Brigade efficient or useful, as soldiers — like other lawyers, some of them within our acquaintance, the uniform of a General wa.s attractive to him ; he secured an office of distinction ; and he continued to occupy it, until, on the establishment of the new form of Government, after having been defeated in his canvass for the office of Governor, he was trans- ferred into the more comfortable, if not the more profitable place, of Secretary of State, which he occupied until 1789, and was succeeded by his son, who held the place until 1798. On the following day, [June 10, 1776,] the Provin- cial Congress elected the Field-officers of the Regi- ment in which the levies from Westchester-county were to be enrolled ; and Samuel Drake, who was then commanding the skeleton Regiment of Westchester- county Minute-men, in the Continental Service,^ was elected Colonel; John Hulbert, of Suffolk," was elected Lieutenant-colonel ; Moses Hetfield, of Or- ange-county, was elected Major.' The Line-officers of the Regiment and the other details of its organiza- tion of the Regiment will be noticed, hereafter. A matter of i)articular interest to the inhabitants of Westchester-county occurred during the session of the third Provincial Congress; and it may properly be mentioned in this narrative. It will be remembered that, on the suggestion of General Lee, a Magazine of Provisions was ordered to be established, in Westchester-county; that the Delegates from that County were authorized to jiur- chase, on the account of the Provincial Congress, the Pork and Beef which were desired ; that, subsequent- ly. Colonel Gilbert Drake, the Chairman of the County Committee and one of the Deputies from the County, so managed the affiiir that all the purchases ♦ Jonmal of the Provincial Congress, "Sunday Morning June 9, 1770." 'Vide pages 328-330, ante. ^It is doubtful if he ever joined the Regiment, {Colonel Henry B. Liu- vifjston to the Committee of Arrangement, *' Fishkilt., 2-1 Novr., 1776;") and he resigned, on the ninth of December, 1770, {John Hulbert to the Committee of Arrangement, " Fish Kill, December 9, 1776.") William Goforth, who had served honorably in Canada, was elected to the vacancy, {Minutes of the Committee of Arrangement, " Fishkili., "Jany 1.3, 1777 ;") but, in February, he declined to continue in the place, {Philip Van Cortlandt to the Committee of Arrangement, "FiSHKILL, "Feby. 25, 1777.") ' Moses Hetfield was Captiiin of the Company of Minute-men, at Go- shen, in September, 1775; {Historical Munuscripts, etc.: Milit/iry Hetitrns, xxvi., 133;) in February, 1776, he was nominated as First Major of the Regiment of Goshen, {the same, .xxvii., 77 ;) to which office he was subse- quently appointed, {the same, xxvii., 135.) THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 3G7 of Flour, Beef, and Pork, with all the golden oppor- tunities for personal profits which were thus afforded, were concentrated in his own hands; that there were, consequently, rival purchasing Agent-i, by whom and by the shrewd farmers, the prices of tho.se articles were so greatly advanced that the Committee of Safety was constrained to interfere; and that, after the various buyers, on the account of the Congress, had thus secured their several harvests of the official plunder, the authority was suspended, the Magazine, very soon after, being declared unnecessary ; ' and the provisions which had been bought, at high prices, were thrown on the market again, for such prices as, under such circumstances, could be obtained for them, from the Contractors and Commissaries of the Continental Army.'^ Under the Rules of the Provin- cial Congress, the accounts and the vouchers had to be audited, before the former could be closed ; and Colonel Gilbert Drake, who had endeavored to super- sede his associates, in making the necessary pur- chases, could not produce a sufficient amount of those vouchers to balance his accounts — he had received three thousand pounds, in money; fifty pounds of that sum he could not account for; he was mean enough to hesitate, when the missing fifty pounds were officially called for, preferring, rather to go down to posterity, through all time, as a defaulter;' and the matter was laid before the Congress, to be patched up, in some way which would spare him from paying the one hundred and twenty-five dollars, which had disappeared, he did not know how. The subject was one of those which, by hook or by crook, the Secretaries of the Provincial Congress were apt to pass, without making an official record of them ; and we have found no mention of it, on the Journal of the Provincial Congress, until a special Committee who had been previously appointed "to " take into consideration the case of Colonel Gilbert '• Drake, relative to a loss of fifty pounds he sustained " in receiving and paying out the monies deposited in " his hands, for the purpose of purchasing and laying " up iu store a certain quantity of salted Pork, pur- " suant to an Order of the late Provincial Congress," made its report, on the fifteenth of June. In that Report, the facts were duly recited, very much to the depreciation of the vindictive Colonel's manliness, although it recommended that he be allowed for his loss, and that he be also compensated " for his other " services," the latter having been asked for, by no others of the Deputies who had also traversed the County and had made similar purchases and had been contented with what they had respectively made, iu the 1 Vide pages 333-335, ante. ^Journal of the Provinrial Congress, "Die Mercurii, 9 ho., A.M., Au- •'gust 14, 1776." ^Gilbert Drake seemed to care very little for the respect of poster- ity ; and his ill-couduct iu the maaagemunt of his moDelary dealings with others, after the establishment of the Peace, led the Grand Jury to indict him, on a charge of e.\tortion, {HecortU of the Court, in man- uscript, County-clerk's office, at the White Plains.J operations. The Congress declared, as its opinion, "that Colonel Gilbert Drake sustained a loss, which "accrued in receiving and paying out tlie public " money, in purchasing Pork, by order of the late " Provincial Congress," without, however, assuming the loss referred to ; and then it voted the gallant Colonel, " the sum of seventy pounds, as a compensa- " tion for his services, expenses, and commissions, in " purchasing the said Pork, as aforesaid," and leaving him officially "whitewashed," with twenty pounds and what, besides, he had made in the operations, snugly secured in his pocket-book. It was proven, in that instance, that influence was u.-eful, even among " patriots ; " and the Chairman of Westchester- couuty's County Committee, in the same instance, found it well to have been a Drake.* As we have already stated,-" the third Provincial Congress was alarmed by theentrance of General Howe into the harbor of New York, and precipitately dis- banded, without a formal adjournment, although it had previously provided for a reassembling of the Deputies, at the Court House, in the White Plains, on the following Tuesday, [July 2, 1776.] As it did n(»t thus resume its work, it ceased to exist; and, whether for good or for evil, the third Provincial Congress and all which it did and all which it failed to do became subjects of history. ****** The latter half of the year 1776 was one of the most eventful periods in the history of America, if not in that of the entire civilized world ; and in the great drama of political and military events, teeming with immediate interest and with ultimate import- ance, and occupying only that short half-year, Westchester-couuty, in New York, and those who were, then, within the limits of that ancient County — the peaceful and industrious farmers whose homes were there, as well those strangers, armed or unarmed, who had gone into the County, uo matter for what purpose — occupy places which were, then, as con- spicuous as, since the close of that period, they have been well-known, from one extreme of Christendom to the other. On the second of July,* General Howe and the army which he commanded, whose entrance into the harbor of New York, a few days before, has been already noticed,' occupied Stateu-Island — Richmond- county — with the military and naval forces which ho had brought from Halifax, say seven thousand, five hundred, and fifty-six, rank and file, including those * Journal of the Provincial Congress, "Die Sabbati, A.M., June 15 " 1776." 5 Vide page 338, ante. "General Howe's Observations on a pamphlet entitled Lettei-s to a Xo- blenian, 47. See, also, General Hoice to Lord George Gennain, " Staten Islanh, 7th "July, 177G; " General Washington to the President of the Coutinentul Congress, "New- York, July 3, 1776." ' Vide pages 339, 340, aute. 368 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. who were sick ; ^ and, as has been already stated, the inhabitants of that beautiful island, remembering the sentence of outlawry which had been pronounced against them, by the Provincial Congress, and the multiplied outrages to which they had been sub- jected, on warrants of the same body, by those who claimed to be the special defenders of the Rights of Man ; and being, also, relieved from apprehensions of a renewal of their sufferings, "testified their " loyalty by all the means in their power," furnishing the new-comers with " fresh Provisions, Carriages, " Horses, etc.," ^ and meriting, from him, the high praise which General Howe awarded to them, in his despatches to the Home Government.' It is proper that we shall say, in this connection, that General Howe, on his arrival at Sandy-hook, on the twenty-fifth of June, had been met by Governor Tryon and many others, " fast friends to Govern- "ment," from whom he had received "the fullest " information of the state of the rebels," and of their situation and defences, in the City of New York and. on Long Island. His inquiries, concerning the face of the country between Gravesend and Brooklyn and concerning the military works which had been thrown up, had afforded information which had been so entirely satisfactory that he had determined to land the Army, at Gravesend, immediately, and to move, from that base, without the slightest delay and with only the small effective force which was then under his command, on the insufficient works which, at that early day, had been constructed in Kings-county. For the prosecution of that purpose, two days after the arrival of the Fleet and the Army, at Sandy Hook, {^July 1, 1776,] the former had been moved up to Gravesend-bay, now so universally known to New Yorkers as one of their Summer resorts, in order that the troops might be landed, at daybreak, on the following morning, [-/"/y 2, 1776,] and, thence, make the first movement in the Campaign, against the insignificant works and yet more insignificant force which, at that time, were clustered around Brooklyn.'' ^ General Howe's Observations^ 45, ^GeDeral JIuwe's Observations^ 50. 3 General Jloice Ui Lord Geonje Germaine^ "Stated Island, 7th July, **1776." General Huwe's Observations, 50. 4 General Washington's means for obtaining intelligence were very defective — how should it have been otherwise, among those whom the Provincial Congress had soured by the outrages inflicted on them or on their neighbors and friends? lie was not informed of the arrival of General Howe, until three days after it had occurred ; and then only through information received through a prisoner, whom the Schuyler, armed sloop, had captured. On the same day on which that intelligence was received by him, General Washingion wrote to the Continental Congress : " I could wish "General Howe and his annament not to arrive yet, as not more than "a thousand Militia have come in, and our whole force, including the "troops at all the detached posts and on board the armed vessels, "which are comprehended in our Returns, is but small and inciinsider- "able when compared with the extensive lines they are to defend and, "most probably, the Army that he brings. I have no further intelli- "gence about him than what the Lieutenant" [Lavisvn, of the armed "sloop Schuyler] "mentions: but it is extremely probable his accounts "and conjectures are true," {General Washington to the President of the It is not now known, if it was ever known, what the result of that early movement of the Royal Army would have been, had General Howe's purposes been duly executed ; but there can be little doubt that, with no more than the small force which was then under his command and with the reinforcements which an early success would have surely brought to him, from Richmond, Kings, and Queens-counties, the insufficiently armed and ill-appointed handful of half-hearted men whom General Washington com- manded or endeavored to command, would have been entirely overcome; and that, thereby, the physical strength of the Rebellion would have been surely broken.^ But " the bright designs " of God had been directed to an entirely diflferent end; and the up- lifted hand of General Howe fell, harmlessly, with- out striking the meditated and well-aimed and powerful blow — during the night, after the Fleet had anchored in Gravesend-bay, and while the prepara- tions for landing the troops, at the approaching day- break, were in progress, and while the soldiery, smarting under the disgrace which had befallen it, at Boston, was eagerly preparing to recover its pro- fessional respectability, in an encounter, in the field, with those by whom it had been, there, humiliated, somebody, history does not say whom although intel- ligent conjecture undoubtedly supplies the informa- tion, approached the commanding General with "particular information of a strong pass, upon a " ridge of craggy heights, covered with wood, that lay " in the route the Army must take, only two miles "distant from the front of the enemy's encampment "and seven from Gravesend, which the rebels would " undoubtedly occupy before the King's troops could ConlinenttU Congress, " New ToEK, 27 June, mt>," postscript dated "June " 28th."] On the following day. General Washington wrote thus: "I suppose "the whole fleet will be in, within a day or two." [It all arrired on thit day,^ "I am hopeful, before they are prepared to attiick, that I "shall get some reinforcements. Be that as it m.ay, I shall attempt "to make the best disposition I can of our troops, in order to give them "a proper reception, and prevent the ruin and destruction they are " meditating against us," (General Washington to the President of the Con' linenlal Congress," tfEW York, 29 June, 1776.") A few days after General Washington had thus conveyed the intel- ligence of the weakness of his command, to the Continental Congress, the .\ijjutant-general of the .\rmy is said to have written to a member of the same Congress, on the same subject, in these words: "With an "Army of force, before, and a secret one, behind, we stund on a point "of land with six thousand old troops, if a year's service of about half "can entitle them to the name, and about fifteen hundred new levies, "of this Province, many disaffected and more doubtful. In this situ- " ation we are; every man in the Army, from the General to the Pri- "vate, acquainted with our true situation, is exceedingly discouraged. "Had I known the true posture of affairs, no consideration would have "tempted me to have taken an active part of this scene ; and this sen- *'timent is univei'sal," [Adjutant-general Joseph Peed "to a Member of " Congress," "New Yoek, July 4, 177(i," quoted by Dr. Gordon, in his History of the Pise, Progress and Establishment of the Independence of the United States of America, Edition, London : 1788, ii., 278.) 6 " General Howe is sufficiently strong, considering the goodness of his "troops, to make a successful attempt upon the Americans; but being "in daily expectation of the reinforcements from Europe, he will un- "doubtedly remain inactive till their arrival," (Gordon's History, etc., London edition, ii, 278.) THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. "get up to it; and, from the minutest description, "judging an attack upon this post, so strong by " nature and so near the front of the enemy's works, "to be too hazardous an attempt, before the arrival of " the troops with Commodore Hotham," ' \_frniii Europe,'] "daily expected," the General "declined " the undertaking; " and, consequently, the day-break came and went without tlie promised debarkation of the Army ; the Fleet weighed its anchors, " passed the " Narrows," came too at the watering place, where it again cast its anchors ; the Army was landed on Staten Island, as already stated ; the first mistake of the Campaign was committed; the first disastrous delay was inaugurated ; General Washington and his feeble command were, for the time, spared; and the Re- bellion was not suppressed. With an abundant naval force under his command. General Howe commanded and controlled all the waters which were near him ; and Gravesend-bay need not have been regarded as the only base which he could have occupied — he could have turned the tiauk of any or of all the lines, either of hills or of armed rebels, and have landed his command either in front or on the rear of either of the latter, as he should have determined ; and he could have led his abundantly supplied, admirably disciplined, and thoroughly willing command to an immediate and effectual success, had not his willing ears listened to those who inclined to Peace, and had not his sympathies controlled his judgment and over- come his sense of duty witli the hope that tlie day of reconciliation — of reconciliation to be secured through himself — was not yet passed. He hesitated ; and the golden opportunity passed away, never to be re- turned. On the same second of July, and while the Royal Army was thus occupying Staten Island, the Conti- nental Congress, at Philadelphia, was considering the subject of Independence. ****** It will be remembered by the reader that, in 1774, when the County of Westchester was invited, by the Committee of Fifty-one, in the City of New York, to 1 Conmiodore Hotham did not reach New York until the twelfth of August, as will be seen, hereafter. ^General Uoice to Lord George Germain, "Staten Island, "th July, " 177C." See, also, [Captain Hall's] Hinlnnj of the Civil War in America, i., 174 ; Stednian's History <>/ the Americutt ]r«r, i., luO, I'Jl. Stedniaii said, " the troops thus landed," [on Staten /sluiirf,] "consisted "of two Battalions of Light Infantry; two of Grenadiers; the Fourth, "Fiftli, Tenth, Seventeenth, Twenty-second, Twenty-third, Twenty sev- "enth, Thirty-fifth, Thirty-eighth, Fortieth, Forty second. Forty-third, " Forty-fourth, Forty fifth, Forty-ninth, Fifiy-second, Fifty -sixth, Sixty- " third, and Sixty -fourth Regiments of Foot ; parts of the Forty-six.th " and Seventy first Regiments ; and the Seventeenth Regiment of Light " Dragoons. There were, besides, two Companies of Volunteers, raised " at JJew-Vork, consisting of one hundred men each. The total amount "was nine thousand men" — in which latter statement, in general terms, he is contradicted by General Howe, in his Observntiong, {vide puges, 3ti7, 308, ante.) although he gave the aggregate, including the Officers and Staff, while General Howe included only "the Itank and File of his command. 31 369 unite with that Committee in sending a Delegation to the proposed Congress of the Continent which had been called for the purpose of securing a proper and united opposition to the measures of the Ministry and, lis far as possible, a redress of the grievances of the Colonies, the great body of the farmers in that County disregarded that invitation ; and that the very few who accepted it, either personally or by their local Committees, assembled at the Court-house, in the White Plains ; called one of the principal land- holders of the County, who was, also, at that time a Representative of the County in the General Assembly of the Colony, Frederic Philipse by name, to the Chair ; and signified the opposition to the measures of the Home Government, of, at least, those who were present, by authorizing the Delegation who had been elected to represent the City and County of New York, to represent, at the same time, the County of Westchester, in that general assemblage of Delegates.^ It will be remembered, also, that the General Assembly of the Colony, which was convened in January, 1775, although there was not, within it, a single " friend of the Government," every member having been an avowed member of the party of the Opi^osition, had presented the lamentable spectacle of a great party divided into factions, each seeking to secure the same great result, but by distinct and radically different means. In the conflicts of factions, in that body, it will be remembered that no more consistent and no more steadfast ojjponents of the Home and Colonial Governments were seen than the two Representatives of the County of Westchester and the other two, who represented, respectively, the Manor of Cortlandt and the Borough Town of West- chester, although Frederic Philipse, representing the County, and Isaac Wilkins, representing the Borougli, were of one faction, and John Thomas, also repre- senting the County, and Pierre Van Cortlandt, rep- resenting the Manor of Cortlandt, were of the other and opposing faction.* At the adjournment of the House, in April, 1775, these four gentlemen appeared to have returned to their respective homes, and to have remained there, without immediately participating in the political events of the day, except in the instance of Frederic Philipse and Isaac Wilkins, who, eight days after the adjournment of the General Assembly, united in the Declaration and Protect against the assembling of the Provincial Convention for the sole purpose of electing Delegates to a second Congress of the Continent, which Declaration and Protest a large number of the inhabitants of the County of Westchester then signed and published.^ It will be remembered, also, that among the earliest of those whom the handful of office-seekers, in the interest of themselves and of the Rebellion, proscrib- s Vide page 208, ante. * Vide pages 224, 225, ante. 5 Vide pages 248-2o0, ante. HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. SYO ed, because of his action in the General Assembly — notwithstanding it was in an earnest opposition to the Ministry and in an equally earnest support of the demands of the Colony for a redress of grievances — because of his Declaration and Protest at the White Plains, and, undoubtedly, because of his understood authorship of some political tracts which were obnoxious to the controling political faction, Isaac Wilkins was obliged to seek personal safety in flight — he left his family and his estate and found a refoige in London.' After having spent some months in retirement, Pierre Van Cortlandt resumed his place in the polit- ical turmoil of the period ; while Frederic Philipse and John Thomas, the former at Yonkers and the other in the Harrison Precinct, are not known to have taken any part whatever, in the partisan operations of that period. When the spirit of proscription was introduced into Westchester-county, destroying the peace which had previously prevailed among its rural inhabitants, Frederic Philipse was named among those who, with- out the slightest evidence of any wrong-doing, were to be arrested and dealt with.- He does not appear to have been disturbed, however, until the organiza- tion of the notorious " Committee to Detect Conspira- " cies," of which mention has been already made;^ when, at the head of the List of Suspected Persons, in Westchester-county, who were designated as the victims of that American Inquisition, was placed the name of "* Frederic Philipse X" — the asterisk before the name indicating that he was " to be Sum- "moned;" and the cross which followed the name indicating that he was " to be Arrested." * The Minutes of the Committee also indicate that on the twenty-seventh of June, 1776, an Order was made by that body, " That Summonses issue against the " following persons as inimical to ,the Cause and "rights of America, returnable on Wednesday the " third day of July next at ten o'clock in the forenoon " of the same day, viz : Frederick Philipse and " Samuel Merritt, which said Summonses signed by " all the members present af were delivered to the "Secretary with directions to deliver them to the " messenger to be served."' The Summons thus issued was served on Frederic Philipse, at Philipsborough, the present City of Yonkers, on Saturday evening, the twenty-ninth of June ; and, on the following Tuesday, [July 2, 1776,] he made the following reply to the Committee : 1 Vide page 254, ante. 2 List of WeatcJiester County Tories : Historical Manuscripts, etc. ; Mis- cellaneous Papers, xxxiv., 193. 3 Vide pages 344-347, ante * Minutes of the Committee to Detect Conspiracies, "Die Sabbati, 12 ho., "June 15, 1775:" Historical Manuscripts, etc., Miscellaneous Papers, xxxiv., 307, and xxx., 150. ^Minutes of the Committee to Detect Conspiracies, "Thursday, A.M., *' June 27, 1776 : " Historical Manuscripts, etc., Miscellaneous Papers, xxxT., 485. "Philipsborough, July 2, 1776. " Gentlemen : " I was served on Saturday evening last with a " paper signed by you, in which you suggest that " you are authorized by the Congress to summon cer- " tain persons to appear before you, whose conduct " had been represented as inimical to the rights of "America, of which number you say I am one. " Who it is that has made such a representation or " upon what particular facts it is founded, as you have " not stated them, it is impossible for me to imagine ; " but, considering my situation and the near and " intimate ties and connexions which I have in this " country,* which can be secured and rendered ' Frederic Philipse was a native of the Colony ; and the familj' had been well known residents of New York for more than a century pre- ceding the date of this letter, and was connected, by marriage, with the other leading families of America — even George AVashington had not scrupled to seek an alliance with it, if tradition speaks truly. The well-known Kev. Timothy Dwight, S. T. D., President of Tale- college, writing of Yonkers, in the Autumn of 1811, said, "it is remark- " able for nothing, except having been the residence of the family of " Philipse, one of the most distinguised of those which came, as Colonists, " from the United Netherlands. Colonel Philipse, the last branch *' resident in this country, I knew well. He was a worthy and re- " spectable man, not often excelled in personal and domestic amiable- " ness. Mrs. Philipse was an excellent woman; and the children, the "eldest of whom was about seventeen, gave every promise of treading " in the same steps," {Travels, in New England and New York, iii., " 442, 443.) Mr. Bolton [Histm-y of Westchester-county, Second Edition, i., 523,) quot- ing from an original manuscript, in the handwriting of John Jay, said that that most zealous and most malignant of all 31r. Philipse's perse- cutors, s;iiil of him, probably in the later years of the life of the writer, "He was a well-tempered, amiable man ; and a kind, benevolent land- " lord. He had a taste for gardening, planting, &c., and employed " much time and money in that way. * * * At the commencement " of our Revolution, he, Frederick Philipse, was inclined to the Whigs, " but was afterwards persuaded to favor the Tories.* He was removed " to Connecticut, on his parole. Nothing could have been more favor- "able to him, circumstanced as he then was, than to be placed in such "a state of tranquil neutrality. On a certain occasion, he obtained per- " mission to go to New York, while in possession of the enemy. On '* being afterwards required to return, he very impro])erly and unwisely "yielded to the importunities of certain of his friends, and refused to " return. His estate was confiscated." Sabine, notwithstanding his notorious bitterness, repeated the story of the moral worth of this unwieldy, blind man, who lived on his estate, taking no part whatever in the partisan movements of the period. [lAiyalists of the American BevoUition, original edition, 537, 538 ; revised edition, ii., 186, 187.) The persecution of Frederic Philipse and the robbery of his family, mainl3' through the two Jays, is a subject which some one will, here- after, be very likely to examine and expose, in all its native ugliness, to the censure of the world. * No one knew better than John Jay that there was another cause than that named, which led Frederic Philipse to dissent from the doings of John Jay, James Duane, Governeur Morris, et al. Frederic Philipse continued to be a member of the Colonial party of the Opposition, in New York, until, by the advice of the Committee of which John Jay was one of the master spirits and the Chairman, he was seized by the military power and sent into exile ; and the scheme and trick by means of which those exiles who had been allowed to go into New York, did not receive the notices which Governor Trumbull sent for their return, affording a pretext for the sequestration of their large estates, was not a secret to those who were, then, in the ring of " patriotic " money-seekers, nor is it a secret to us, now. Common respect for the truth should have led John Jay to have told the whole of the story concerning Frederic Philipse's visit to New York and his stay there, or to have said nothing concerning it. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 371 " happy to me only by the real and permanent pros- " perity of America, I should have hoped that suspi- " cions of this harsh nature would not be easily " harboured. However, as they have been thought of " weight sufficient to attract the notice of the Congress, " I can only observe that, conscious of the upright- "ness of my intentions and the integrity of my con- " duct, I would most readily comply with your Sum- " mons, but the situation of my health is such as " would render it very unadvisable for me to take a "journey to New York, at this time. I have had the " misfortune, Gentlemen, of being deprived, totally, " of the sight of my left eye ; and the other is so '• much attected and inflamed as to make me very " cautious how I expose it, for fear of a total loss of "sight. This being my real situation, I must request " the favour of you to excuse my attendance, to- " morrow; but you may rest assured, Gentlemen, that " I shall punctually attend, as soon as I can, con- " sistent with my health; flattering myself, in the " meantime, that, upon further consideration, you " will think that my being a friend to the rights " and interests of my native country is a fact so " strongly implied as to require no evidence on my " part to prove it, until something more substantial " than mere suspicion or vague surmises are proved " to the contrary. " I am. Gentlemen, your most obedient, humble " servant Frederick Philipse. "To Lkoxahd Gaxsevoort, Philip LrvxNGSxox, "Thomas Tredwell, Lewis Graham, Gouv- "ernedr Morris, Thomas Raxdall, Es- " quires." ' As the Provincial Congress, as well as its Com- mittee to Detect Conspiracies, had hurriedly left the City of New York before the day appointed for the hearing of Frederic Philipse and Samuel Merritt ; ^ and as only one of the members of the Committee had lingered, after the Congress and the Committee had retired ; ' the proceedings against them, at that time, were evidently suspended — the suspension of the persecution of Mr. Philipse, however, was speedily followed by a similar proceeding, of which mention will be made, hereafter. The fourth Provincial Congress was directed to meet at the Court-house, in the White Plains, on • Force's American Archiref, Fuurtli Series, vi., 1215, 1216. ' Vide pages 'MO .347, ante. 'Judge Jones, who was, also, one of those wliom the Committee had summoned, related the fact that, on the thirtieth of June, Governeur Morris was the only member of the Committee who had not left the City, in the general panic. Hatonj of Sew York during the Iterolu- lionarij Mar, ii., 206.) In view of Governeur Morris's great anxiety to go into the City of New Tork, then n milititry post of the Royal Troops, very soon afterwards, it will hardly be necessary for us to inquire why he was the only member of the Provincial Congress who voluntarily exposed himself to supposed danger from the approach of the Royal .\rmy. * Jonrunl nf ihe (tliirtl; ProcuKutl Congress, " ."'unday afternoon, June " ■V', 177(;. ■ until the following day, Tuesday, the ninth of July, the Deputies from a majority of the Counties appeared, produced their Credentials, and organized the Con- gress. General Nathaniel WoodhuU was chosen for its President ; and John McKesson and Robert Benson, the Secretaries of the former Congresses, were continued in the same places, in this.* There were only five Deputies present from the City of New York, although twenty-one had been elected; but every member of the Deputation from Westchester-county — Colonel Lewis Graham, Colonel Pierre Van Cortlandt, Major Ebenezer Lockwood, William Paulding, Captain Jonathan Piatt, Samuel Haviland, Zebadiah Mills, Colonel Gilbert Drake, Jonathan G. Tompkins, General Lewis Morris, and Gouverneur Morris— was present.* Of the latter Captain Piatt, Colonel Van Cortlandt, Zebadiah Mills, and General Lewis Morris were new members.' After a letter from the Delegation of the Colony in the Continental Congress, bearing date the second of July, " on the subject of Independence, and request- " ing instructions from this Congress,"* had been read, a second letter from the Delegation, of a subsequent date, " enclosing the Declaration of Independence," was also read, and referred to a Committee consisting of John Jay and Abraham Brasier, of the City of New York, Abraham Yates, Junior, of Albany-county, and John Sloss Hobart and William Smith, of Suffolk.' The Declaration which was thus referred, was a duly authenticated copy of A Declaration by the Rep- resentatives of the United States of America, in General Congress assembled, of which document mention has been already made ; and, with its authentication, in extenso, it was entered at length on the Journal of the Congress}" A very important letter, concerning prisoners of Monday, the eighth of July, 1776 ; * but it was not ^ Journal of the Provincial Congress, "Tuesday, 9th July, 177C." Very singularly, and without the slightest authority except that of J. Warren Tompkins, Bolton, (Hiflonj of Westvhester-counlij, original edition, ii., 359 ; the same, second edition, ii., 564,) considered the Con- gress which was assembled, at the White Plains, on the ninth of July, 177G, as the same body as that which had been in session, in the City of New York, from the eighteenth of May until the thirtieth of June, pre- ceding. In other words, both these learned historians regarded the third and the fourth Provincial Congresses as one and the same body. 5 Journal of the Provincial Congress, " Tuesday, P.M., White Plai.vs, " July 9, 1776." " The Journal of the Congress, July 9, placed Colonel Van Cortlandt's name at the head of the list of "the new members present" who " took the general oath of secrecy," although the Colonel had headed the Deputation from Weatchester-county, in the third Provincial Con- gress, as will be seen by reference to the Credentials of that Delegation, in the Journal of that Congress, "Die Sabbati, Ic ho., .\.M., May IS, " 1776." The explanation of that apparent contradiction may be found iu the fact that that short lived third Provincial Congress was dissolved before Colonel Pierre Van Cortlandt took his seat in it or was qualilicd to do so, by his taking the oaths of the office of Deputy. 8 George Clinton, Henry U'wht, John Alsi'p, H'iZ/wim Floyd, and FranCli Letcis,li) the Priivincitil Omgress, " PiiiLAnKLI-HiA, July 2, 1776." » Jimnud of the Prorincid Omgnss " Tuesday, Utli July, 1776." ••" Ibid. 372 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. war and those who were, also, confined in the Jail, in the City of New York, for d ebt,' was received from General Washington, and referred to a special Com- mittee ; ^ and after the transaction of some other busi- ness, the Congress adjourned until the afternoon. On the afternoon of the same day, \_Tuesday July 9, 1776,] the Comrhittee to whom had been referred the letter from the Delegation from the Colony in the Continental Congress and the Declaration which that letter had covered, made a Report, thereon, in the following words : "In Convention of the Representa- "tiyes of the State of New York,^ " White Plains, July 9th, 1776. "Resolved, unanimously. That the reasons " assigned by the Continental Congress for declaring "the United Colonies free and independent States " are cogent and conclusive ; and that, while we "lament the cruel necessity which has rendered that " measure unavoidable, we approve the same and " will, at the risk of our lives and fortunes, join with "the other Colonies in sujjporting it. " Resolved, That a copy of the said Declaration " and the aforegoing Resolution be sent to the Chair- " man of the Committee of the County of Westches- " ter, with order to publish the same, with beat of " drum, at this place, on Thursday next," [^July 11, 1775] ; '■ and to give directions that it be published, " with all convenient speed, in the several Districts " within the said County ; and that copies thereof be " forthwith transmitted to the other County Com- " mittees within the State of New York, with orders to "cause the same to be published in the several " Districts of their respetive Counties. " Resolved, That five hundred copies of the Declaration of Independence, v/'ith the two last men- " tioned Resolutions of this Congress for approving " and proclaiming the same, bc published in hand- " bills and sent to all the County Committees in this " State. 1 Joseph Reed, Acfjutanl-general (by the General's order) to the Provin- cial Congress, " Head-quarters, New-York, July 5th, T776." 2 Jonrnal nf the Provinmtl Cnngrets, " Tuesday, 9th July, 177G." 3 In view of the fact that the body of which that Committee was a part and b) whom it had been aiipoihted and to wtiom it was to report, was, specifically, "a Provincial Congress for the Province of New " York ; " and because, at that time, there had betin no change in the status of the Deputations composing the Congre^^s, wlio represented nothing else than certain specified Counties, each Deimlation represent- ing only a single County ; and because, at that time, the Colony of New Y'ork, could not be possibly reganled as a "State," the caption of that Kei;ort displayed nothing of historical or legal precision, notliing of accuracy of statement, and nothing of good taste. The hand which wrote it cotiid not be concealed ; and if the form of the writing answered the present purpose of the writer of it, in certify- ing his new-born zeal for Independence to his astonished constituents, it would probably answer an equally good purpose in invalidating the in- strument of which it was the head, in case that " Reconciliation " for which the writer of the Report did not cease to hope and to [U'ay and to labor, should be effected. " Resolved, That the Delegates of this State, in " Continental Congress, be and they are hereby "authorized to consent to and adopt all such mea- " sures as they may deem conducive to the happiness "and welfare of the United States of America.'! It is said that the Report which was thus made by the Committee was unanimously adopted by the Congress ; and, further, that an Order was made by the Congress directing that copies of the Resolutions which constituted the Report should be transmitted to the Continental Congress.* The reader need only to be reminded that the evident author and the known supporters of this series of Resolutions were the same author who, twenty- eight days previously, had written, and almost entire- ly the same individual Deputies who, at the same time, had voted, that the authority of "the good "people of this Colony" was, then, necessary to ena- ble the Provincial Congress or the Delegates of the Colony in the Continental Congress "to declare this " Colony to be and continue indejjendentof the Crown " of Great Britain ; " that, in the absence of any such authority already delegated to themselves or to the Colony's Delegates in the Continental Congress, it was, at that time, considered proper and necessary to ask for authority to do so, if it should be subsequently considered expedient and proper to make such a declaration of Independence, in behalf of that " good "people" of whom they, then, acknowledged them- selves to have been only agents or deputies ; that, for reasons which will be remembered, no such authority, then nor subsequently, had been delegated to either themselves or to the Colony's Delegates in the Con- tinental Congress, by that "good people" whose servants and representatives both they and the Dele- gates referred to acknowledged themselves to have been ; and that, on the later occasion, which is now under notice, themselves having been the witnesses, they were quite as much without authority, legal or revolutionary, "to declare this Colony to be and " continue independent of the Crown of Great "Britain," as they had been, on the former occasion, of which mention has been made. If it had been an act of usurpation to have declared the Independence of the C"dony, without the "consent" of the Colony, previously given, on the former occasion, how much less flagrant was the act, also without having obtain- ed that "consent," on the later occasion, which is now under consideration ? Were John Jay and those whom ^ Jounml of tlte Provincial Congress, " Tuesday, P.M., Whitf. Pr.AiNS, "July 9th, 177G." The Jimniid of the CoiitiiienUil Oingrrss, of Jlonday, the fifteenth of July, stated that a coi)y of the first, second, and fourth of these very im- portant Itesolutionshad been enclosed, with a number of other papei-s, in a letter dated on the eleventh of that month, and sent to that Congress ; that the letter and the papers which were enclosed in it were received by the Continental Congress, on Monday, the fifteenth of July ; that the three Resolutions named were entered at length, on the Jfrnrnal of that Congress; and that " the letter, with the papers enclosed," was referred to (be Hoard of War. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 373 he controlled really honest and sincere, when, on the eleventh of June, preceding, they made the confession of their legal incapacity to make such a declaration of Independence, unless with the previously-obtained "consent" of that "good people" whose servants and deputies they then acknowledged themselves to have been ? If so, what possible ground is there for consistently regarding them as either honest or sincere, when, on the ninth of July, the occasion which is now under notice, while they were yet without that " consent" of their principals and constituents which had been previously regarded as essential to ensure validity to any such action, they actually, on their own motion, made such a declaration ; severed the political connection which had previously existed between the Colony and Great Britain; abrogated all the Laws under which the Colony had been pre- viously governed ; de[)osed the previously existing Colonial Government ; and usurped, to themselves, without the slightest limitation, the absolute and despotic control of every thing relating to the Civil, the Ecclesiastical, and the Military concerns of all who were within the Colony, not sparing even the con- sciences, the opinions, the properties, the liberties, or the lives of those who presumed to say to them, "What doest thou?" We shall see, hereafter, how much of honesty and integrity there were, in either of these, when the series of Resolutions, on the subject of the Colony's in- dependence, which is now under consideration, was written and adopted ; how little the writer of them honestly and sincerely regarded those Resolutions as being, really, what they appeared to have been ; and how little foundation in truth there is for the greater portion of what has been written concerning that writer and what he did, on the ninth of 'July, 177G. Having disposed of the subject of Independence in the curt and crispy Resolution which headed the series which was reported by the Committee, the Provin- cial Congress turned to other subjects of vastly less importance ; and, two days afterwards, on Thurs- day, the eleventh of July, very probably, no record of the fact having been found, the publication of the Declaration was made, otEcially, at the White Plains, in conformity with the second Resolution of the series, on that subject, which had been adopted by the Congress.' The great importance of that Resolution which gave the sanction of the Colony of New York to the Resolution for Independence which the Congress of the Continent had adopted on the second of July, ' Bolton stated, in bis JIMtri/ nf n'eslclwlt r-cnuiiti/, (ori)pnal pdition, ii., 359, 3r>0; llie oimr, second edition, ii., 5I>4,) that, on the occ(i£ion referred to, "the Urclantliim was read by John T)ionias, Esq., and " seconded by Michael Varian and Sanim l t'niwford, two prominent " Whigs of Scarsilale." But he luis given no authority for the statement ; and unless by " John Thomas, Ksq ," the reailer of the Dcclnrnliim ou the occasion referred to, he meant the younger of the two who bore that name, we must be excused for doubting the accuracy of the state- ment. was seen in the immediate abrogation of all the forms of Law and Government which had previously been seen throughout the Colony, from the earlier period of the settlement by Europeans within its territory; and the substitution, in their stead, of nothing else than the government of unrestrained force, the Law of the stronger. A general Jail-delivery, in the City of New York, signalized the "new departure" — where there was no longer any Law, there could not be any breaches of the Law, either in the matter of pecuniary obligations or in that of any other obligation — and as every civil Commission was cancelled by that Resolu- tion of Independence from the Crown of Great Britain, on the authority of which royal authority every such Commission was based, every Court of Justice was closed, every function of Government was paralyzed, and because no new form of local Government and no new system of Statutes had been provided to take the places of the others, which had been thus vio- lently set aside, there was nothing but confusion and uncertainty; and had not the general conservatism of the Colonists prevailed and jireserved the general peace, the advent of Independence, throughout the Colony of New York, would have been signalized by many a local scene of terrorism and of bloodshed. It was not so in the other Colonies; and had not the master-spirits of the revolutionary faction, in New York, in the interest of Reconciliation, obstructed the work of creating a new form of Government, quite as effectively as, at the same time, they were creating a necessity for such a new system — at least for a Pro- visional Government, if not for a permanent one — New York might, also, have been fully prepared for the great changes, in all her governmental arrange- ments, which were thus crowded on her. A very competent writer, a witness of the great changes of which he wrote and of which we write, thus accu- rately and graphically described them: "The Decla- " ration of Independence, published by Congress on "the fourth of July, 1770, was the first act that i)ut "an end to the Courts of Law, to the Laws of the "land, and to the administration of Justice, under "the British Crown, within the thirteen Colonies. "The revolt was now complete. Upon this event, "the Law, the Courts, and Justice itself ceased: all "was anarchy: all was confusion. A usurped kind "of Government took place: a medley of Military " Law, Convention Ordinances, Congress Recommen- "dations, and Committee Resolutions."^ It is proper that we shall say, however, that, not- withstanding the Declaration of Independence was thus nominally accepted and approved, and notwith- standing New York was thus formally obligated to stand or fall with her sister States in the support and defense of the cause in which they were engaged. Independence had not been, as we have already seen, what the revolutionary faction of the great party of 2 Jones's HiMtyry of Xnp York dvri»£ the lievolntuiHttry HVir, ii., 115. 374 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the Opposition, in New York, had desired and aimed for; nor, since it had been crowded through tlie Con- tinental Congress witliout the approval of the master- spirits of that revolutionary faction of the party and in the face of the determined opposition of those who represented or who, in other Colonies, were affiliated ■with that faction, although the Declaration and Inde- pendence itself had been acquiesced in by the Pro- vincial Congress, did the same faction regard either with the slightest favor; nor, as the subsequent con- duct of its leading members, those of its number from whom the character and disposition of the whole may be fairly estimated, in postponing the establishment of a new form of Government for the young State and leaving it during more than nine months without the slightest semblance of a Govern- ment of any kind, clearly indicated, did that remark- able faction, then, intend to respect either the Reso- lution for Independence or the Declaration of it any longer than would be necessary to enable it to effect a reconciliation with Great Britain, and, thereby, to secure to that family of whom all the faction were either members or hungry followers, all those ofl5cial places, within the Colony, which were then occupied by their hereditary rivals, and all that influence, for like i)urposes of aggrandizement, within other C Io- nics and within the Congress of the confederacy, to which that horde of miscellaneous office-seekers des- perately aspired, and to which, it was fondly con- sidered, it would become reasonably entitled. (Jn the afternoon of the ninth of July, immediately after the Provincial Congress had adopted the Report of the Committee to whom the Declaration of Indepen- dence had been referred, and, thereby, as far as it could do so, had abrogated every Law and every Commission which had rested on the sovereignty of the King of Great Britain, with singular coolness but entirely consistent with the absolutism which had thus been inaugurated and with the disposition and desires of those who then controlled the Congress, the Sheriffs of the several Counties were " authorized " and directed " \not iij Law, but only by the oligarchic will and the consequent ipse dixit of the Congress,^ "to "retain and keep in their custody all prisoners, of " whatever kind, which are or may be in their cus- " tody, until the further order of this Convention, "or until such of them as may be confined for "debt, on civil process, shall be released by the " Plaintiffs so brought against them ; and thus pro- vision was made for the safekeeping not only of the victims of earlier lawlessness but of subsequent abso- lutism, the latter, by the terms of the Resolution, concentrated within the Provincial Congress itself." 1 Jimriml of the Piovmcial Congress, " Tuesday, P.M., WiiiTK Plains, "July 9th, 1776." 2 It is very evident that Jamea De Lanccy , the Sheriff of Westchester- counfy, or the Deputy who represented Iiiin, obeyed the Resolution of the Provincial Congress by holding in confinement, in the County Jail, those " Prisoners of State" who, for political reasons, had been or who Immediately after the provision of depositaries for the victims of its absolutism, as stated in the Resolu* tion above referred to, the Provincial Congress revived the notorious Committee to detect Conspiracies, which had ceased to exist by reason of the dissolution of the Congress who had created it;' united it to the Committee on Prisoners of War, which had been ap- pointed during the morning session; withdrew the authority to interfere with those who were suspected of disaffection, which had been vested in General Washington, by the preceding Provincial Congress, puring the panic occasioned by the arrival of the Royal Army ; * vested the consolidated Committee, thus created, with authority to " carry into execution "all such Resolves of the Continental Congress and "comply with all such necessary requisitions of the ''General" [Washington,'] " as require so much de- " spatch as to render an application to this Congress " impracticable or attended with dangerous delay ; " appointed John Sloss Hobart, of Suffolk, Gouverneur Morris and Colonel Lewis Graham, of Westchester- county, Leonard Gansevoort, of Albany-county, and Thomas Randall and Colonel Henry Remsen, of the City of New York, or any three of them, for such Committee ; " permitted " the Committee " to proceed "iti the business under" [imtof] "them committed, " in such a manner as to them shall appear to be most " agreeable to the dictates of justice and humanity " and most advancive of the public good : " * and so set in motion, again, that concealed instrumentality of despotism, which , under the same plea of " necessity," had stamped the records and the history of the third Provincial Congress wit^ everlasting shame; and, in this later instance, with such an increase of authority as made it, practically, an absolute power which was greater in its ability to oppress the State than even the Provincial Congress itself.* were, subsequently, sent to him, (Petition nf Joshua Pardij and fourteen otiiers, " White Plains Goal, August the 18th, 1770 ; " Petition nf Jona- than Purdij, Junior, " White Plains Goal, August 30th, 1776 ; " Petitirm of Henry Chiise, " Wight Plains Goal, August 30, 1776 ; " etc.) as well as those Prisoners of War who, also, were sent to liira, for safe-keeping, {Exmninatioittt of John Simpson, Jaines Auchnintij, and SfVen oth<'rs. Prisoners of n'ar, " White Plains in Westchester County, July Gth, 1770, com- pared with the PetUuin of William McDermnt, one of the number ; with the Paroles of Jaines Auehmutij and John Simpson and Willitrm McDermot, dated October 20, 1776 ; and with the Petition of John Simpson, William MeDennot, Willixm Elder, and Joseph Wfdkomb, "Octr., 177C ; ") the lat- ter of which Petitions is also interesting because of the information which it brings of the treatment of Prisoners of War, at the White Plains, by those who were in authority, under the "Convention of the Represeuta- " tivcs of the .State of New York ; " etc. » Viiie page 347, ante. * Journal of the Proi'incUd Congress, Sunday Afternoon, June 30th, 1776." ^Journal of th^ Provincud Congress, ''Tuesday, P.M., White Plains, "July 9th, 1770." " Although the Provincial Congress was seated at a distance from the City of New York, this Committee preferred to hold its meetings in that City ; and, with the unlimited authority with which it was vested, with nothing to control its own estimate of a "necessity," and with the strong arm of the military i)ower to support that estimate, that Committee was, in fact, an oligarchy of absolute power, possessing greater means for oppression and outrage than was held by the Provin- cial Congress which had created it and by whose warrant it acted. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 375 On Wednesday, the tenth of July, the Provincial Congress " resolved and ordered that the stylo or " title of this House be changed from ' The Provin- " ' ciAL Congress of the Colony of New- York', "which it had previously borne, to that of 'The " ' Convention of the Representatives of the " ' State of New- York ; ' '' ^ and, thenceforth, there was no open pretension thattheKing of Great Britain was the Sovereign of that portion of America or that those who were within the bounds of her territory owed the slightest allegiance to him or obedience to his commands. The fourth Provincial Congress, notwithstanding the momentous events which were evidently rapidly approaching, was immediately zealous in continuing the remarkable policy which had distinguished the preceding three of the scries and which had served to keep alive and to intensify the feuds of former days, separating the Colonists into factions, bitterly antag- onistic in feelings and in actions, instead of seeking to conciliate those who differed ; to pacify those who were discontented ; to bring into harmony, the thoughts and opinions and desires which were discordant and jarring; and to secure concert of action, for the pro- motion and support of " the common cause," among those who had previously differed only on the means which should be employed for the accomplishment of the common purpose. But the revival, with largely increased authority and without any diminution of malignancy, of the notorious political Inquisition — the Committee to detect Conspiracies — afforded abundant evidence of the purpose of the master-spirits of the new-formed Conviention to keep apart those who might have been united, had a redress of grievances been the only purpose of the movements; and to drive over into the ranks of the Royal Army or into the service of that Army, those who, under a more judicious policy, would not have become enemies, eager for retaliation, even if they had not become very active friends. The outlawry of Richmond and Queens-counties and the terrible outrages which had been inflicted on their peaceful inhabitants, under the authority or with the permission of the earlier Provincial Congresses, had already produced their legitimate results, in the eagerness with which the persecuted and outraged inhabitants of each of these Counties had accepted the protection of the Royal Army and taken up arms for retaliatory action ;^ and ^ Jotmml of Ihe ProHncuil Cougnse, "Wednesday luorniiig, White "Plains, July 10th, 1T76." Doctor Sparks erroneously stated, ( Wriliiigs of George M'lKhiiigtoii, iii., 470, note,) that that change in the title of the Provincial Congress was made on the iiiiUh of July, and cited the Manuscript Jounml of the Oan- gren, of the ninth of July, as his authority : we have preferred to depend on the official copy of that Juunuil, as it was printed by order of the Legislature, in 1842, which clearly indicates that the change was made on the following day. 'John Adams was either a very poor judge of human nature or a very besotted and haughty aristocrat, regarding the masses as unworthy of his sympathy or respect, or both, when he wrote of these people, then nothing else than a continued and a more than ever before besotted haughtiness, utterly unmindful of the Rights of those who were assumed to be subject to their authority, and a continued and more than ever before mulish stubbornness, in their continued determination to reduce every one who opposed them, no matter how slightly, to an unconditional and abso- lute submission of thought, word, and deed, to their oligarchic authority, regardless of any and every conse- quence to others or to the country at large — only such a haughtiness and such a stubbornness, indeed, as had characterized the Colonial policy and the administra- tion of Lord Bute and Lord North and Lord George Germaine and their Tory associates, in England; the same as those which had controlled the three Congresses which had preceded it, after the members of the first of them had been induced to wander into the green pastures of the revolutionary faction — could have induced the master-spirits of this new Provincial Con- gress, under the peculiar circumstances which had recently arisen, to disregard the significant teachings of their earlier policy, and to create disaffection and to raise up enemies when harmony and a concert of action, in the cause of their common country, had become so vitally necessary. In the prosecution of that ill-advised and injudicious, as well as barbarous, policy, it continued to make arrests of individuals whom somebody had denounced as " suspected ; ^ and even individual members of the Convention, on their individual motions, without the slightest charge against their victims, ordered individuals into imprisonment.* bleeding from every pore, from outrages inflicted on them by authority or with the permission of the Provincial Congress, and rejoicing that protection had been extended to them and to their property, by stran- gers, in such svorils as these : " The unprincipled and unfeeling and un- "natunil inhabitants of Staten-Ishinil are conllally receiving the enemy • "and, deserters say, have engaged to take arms. They are an ignorant, " cowardly pack of scoundrels. Their numl)er3 are small, anil their "spiritless." (L««cr Mm. .-liJ.ims, " 1'iiii.adei,phia, July U, 1770. ") Mr. .\dams should have told just what he would have done, had he and his family passed through such au ordeal of '• patriotism " as tlieso islanaers had sustained, and had he, as they were, been without hope of relief from his own countrymen. The record of his judgment would, then, have been complete. 3 See the instances of Christopher Templer, {Journal of the Couventi.n, "Die Lun,-*, i ho., P.M., July 22, 177G ; ") that of Robert Sutton, {the mme, " Die ilercurii, 9 ho., A.M., July 24th, 177G ;") that of Nicholas Couwenhoven, {Jounml of Ok Cummiihe of Sm of Henry Chase and three oOiertt, " White " Plains, July 25, 1776 : " Historical Munuscriptt, etc. ; PelUium, xxxiii. 152.) On the thirtieth of August, Chase again petitioned the Convention, as follows : 376 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Arrests were thus made, very often, without the slightest reason, even from the standpoint of those ex- ercising the authority ; ' and even women, when they " Wight Plains Goal, August 30, 1776. "Gentlemen: My coufinement is the Reasou of my Petitioning to *'you the Honorahle Provential Congress, hopeing j'our Honours will be " Pleas'! to Take my (Jase into Consideration for the Comete of Safety " [the C'jinmitb'e of Wt'stclu'ster-coimiyl * Says that tliey have no Right to *'try me So I leave my Case to your Honnours and Begg that your *'Honnours would Coucider me for I have bin imprisoned a long time, "and nothing Appeared against me, So I begg that your Hounonrs " would consider me as Quick as Possible for I am a Poor man and itt is " a Great Dam mage to me to Ly in Prison, so Gentlemen I Leave my " Case to your Honnours not Douting but your wisdoms Gentlemen will "do me jestice, the Broken Petition from me, "Henry Chase. " Postscript. Gentlemen I should be very glad if your Honnours " would be so good as to send for me before your Hounour as Quick as " Possible and in so doiug you will greatly me. " Henry Chase." {Histni-iad ULntiiscrij^Oi, etc.: Pt'litlinis : xxxiii., 100.) The County Committee had officially informed Chase, nine days pre- viously, that it had no jurisdiction of his case, and directed him to the Convention, {WL'stcliesier-couidy Committee U) Henry Chase, "In Com- "mittee of Safety for the County of Westchester, White Plains, "Aug. 21, in6"—Huiiimcript.% etc. : PetUions, xxxiii, 102;) but no attention whatever was paid to the ponr man's Petition, by either the Committee of Safety of the State or the Convention to whom it wiis addreiised— he was only "a Poor man," one of the "poor rep- " tiles," of earlier "patriotism." On the thirteenth of September, the unfortunate prisoner again pre- sented a Petition for relief, in these words ; "White Plains Goal, September 13, 1776. "Gentlemen of the Honorable Provenshall Conoress. " This my Humble Petition to Beg of your Honnours to send for me " that I may have my tryal for the County Commete and the Commete " of Safety siiys that they have no Right to try me and I have desird " them to send me to the Honnourable Provenshall Congress and they '•tell me they Dare Not send me without ordi/i-s from your Honnours " Gentfcmen so I shall be very Glad if your Honnours w ill be Good " Knouf to send for me as soon as Possible, for I have bin in Prison "Going on Eight weeks and I cant support myself any Longer,* So " Gentlemen I Shall be very Glad if your Honnours would take my "case into Consideration If your Honnours Pleases so that I may bo "clearJ or condeniJ So Gentlemen I leave my case to your Honnours " wise consideration not Douting but your Honnours will have compas- " siou on a Poor Prisoner. " IIenby Cihse." {HisbiHcal Miinnscripts, etc. : Petithim, x.xxiii., 90.) To this second ajipeal, there does not aiii)ear to have been made the slightest answer, although it Wiis received by the Convention, and -'read," (Jiinninl of Oil- Oiin-entiim, Tuesday morning, Septr. 17, 1770 ;) and His tory is silent concerning the remainder of the victim's career. Those who shall desire to know who and what kind of ^ man it was who had thus pos-sessed and exercised power enough to point his dirty finger at a mao and cause him to be thus outrag d, without any remedy, may be gratified by turning to a PetUwu addressed to the Provincial Con- gress, on the fourth of May, 177G, by William Duer, subsequently well known, (JiisOtrical Mnnmcript.'i, etc. ; Pvtiti/ntH, xxxii., 85 ;) and to the Afcrical Manuscripts, etc. : Miscellaneous P.ipcrs, xxxvi., 257.) 1 The instances of Christopher Templar, already referred to ; that of Robert Sutton, (JounioZ of the Concentlon, "Die Mercurii, 9 ho., A.M., "July 24, 1776 ; ") that of John Thomas, (the same, "Die Sabbati, 9 ho., "A.M., July 27, 1776 ;" that of John Sutton, {the same, "Die Sabbati, 3 " ho., P.M., July 27, 1776 ; ") and othera. *The reader will remember that such prisoners as this, those thrust into confinement because it suited soujebody to " suspect " them, were compelled to support themselves, while in Jail, or to starve, unless some- body should charitably help them to food. refused to be made tools for their inquisitorial prac- tices, were ordered to be imprisoned " until they "should make discovery or declaration aforesaid."^ Arrests were made by military officers, even for al- leged civil offences ; ^ and, of course, the arbitrary arrests of those who were obnoxious to members of the several County Committees were continued, with- out abatement* — the Committee of the City of New York assumed authority to pass over the Hudson- river, into New Jersey ; to arrest six persons, " in " Bergen Woods, near Bull's Ferry ; " and to bring its prisoners over the river, and imprison them in the Jail of the City.* Occasionally, food was provided for those who were thus seized and confined ; ® but such a favor was exceptional : in some instances, the expense of being confined was increased by official extras ; ' but there was an instance, also, wherein a prisoner, arrested by order of the Commander-in- Chief, was liberated from confinement, by the Con- vention, and given the largest liberty, with no other condition than that of an elastic parole, only because of his "connection with a large family of well-attached, "warm Whigs," and because it would be "the most "politic course to do so;"* and a second instance, wherein "a person of equivocal character," in West- chester-county," and who.se name was included in the List of Suspected Persons on which Frederic Philipse's name also appeared,'" and who was ostentatiously sum- moned to appear before the notorious " Committee to "detect Conspiracies," of which his half-brother and 2 See the instance of Elizabeth Hicks, of Rockaway, {Journal of the Cinuention, " Die Mercurii, 9 ho., A.M., August 14, 1776.") 3 See the instanc.'S of George Davy and William Tucker, arrested by Major Graham, (Journal of the Contention, " Thursday morning, July " 18, 1776 ; ") those arrested by Lieutenant Brett, (the same, "Die Veneris, " 4 ho., P.M., Septr. 27, 1776 ; ") etc. ■•The instances of William Sutton and his son, John Sutton, (the latter discharged by the Convention,) arrested by the Committee of Westches- ter-county, (Jtmrual of the Convention, " Die Jovis, 5 ho., P.M. July 25, "1776," J and of Abraham C. Cuyler, John Duncan, Stephen De Lancey, John Monier, and Benjamin Hilton, arrested and banished into Connuc- ticnt, by the Committee of .\lbany-county, (tlie same, " Die Mercurii, 9 "ho., A.M., Augt. 21. 1776,") are noteworthy. ^John Berrian, Chairman, to the Convention, "COMMITTEE CHAMBER, "New-Youk, Augt. 2, 1776;" Journal of the Gntvention, "Die Mer- "curii, 9 ho., A.M., Augt. 7, 1776." 6 The instances of Ilinier Van Housen and Henry Dawkins, in the Jail at the White Plains, (Journal of the Crjuvention, " Friday morning, "Augt. 9, 1776,") may be noticed. 7 William Sutton was arrested and confined in the Jail at the Plains, furnishing his own food, as was usual ; but, soon after, he was banished to Philadelphia, and there confined, "subsisting himself," besides hav- ing been recjuirecl to jiay to Lieutenant Alexander Hunt, who conveyed him to Philadelphia, the expenses of his own journey, the expenses of Hunt while thus engaged in escorting him, and twelve shillings per day to the latter, "for his trouble in the premises." (Journal of the Con- vention, " Die Sabbati, 3 ho., P.M., July 27, 1776.") 8 See the instance of Willett Taylor, who was thus favored, at the in- stance of General John Morin Scott, (Journal of the Convention, " Tues- "day morning, Augt. 13, 1776;" llie same, " Thursday, A.M. , August "15, 1776 ;" General John Morin Scott to John McKesson, "New-Tork, "hora vesp. 13th August, 1776;" the same to , " New- York, "Aug. 13, 1770.") ^ Minutes of the Commiliee to detect Conspiracies, "Thursday, A.M., "June 27, 1770." ^"Historical 3Luniscripts,el{:.: Miscellaneous Papers, xxxvi., 156. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 377 anotlier kinsman were leading members/ was made the "Judge of the High Court of Admiralty of this "State," only thirty-four days after he had been thus summoned to answer a charge of having been "sus- " pected," and before he had answered to that Sum- mons ; ^ and a ttiird instance, when a leading member of the Convention itself, because of his known incli- nations and because of his continued and frequent correspondence with his friends, in the City of New York as well as with those in Philadelphia, after both those Cities had been occupied by the Royal Army ; and because of his expressed desire to go into the City of New York, for the purpose of visiting those friends ; and because of his application for a flag, for the pur- pose of carrying those desires into effect; became gen- erally and very seriously " suspected," ' without hav- ing been officially disturbed, by any one — he was not one of those " poor vipers " of whom he had told, only a few months previously ; * nor did he come within the circle of those whom the dominant, aristocratic clique of that period was inclined to degrade to the level of the common people. There have been some, from that time until this, who have seen that, in the hands of such as then controlled the affairs of New York, the scalesof justice were sadly tilted; that there was one kind of justice for one class of the inhabit- ants and another kind of justice for anotlier class; that, in practice, the vaunted equality of all men was a fiction. It was a favorite practice to remove the victims of these arrests from the vicinage of the alleged offence ; and the Jail at Kingston was much employed,* al- though Morristown, in New Jersey," and Hartford, in Connecticut,' and the City of Philadelphia,'* and ^ Miiiutet of the Committee l/> deled. Conspiracies, " Thuisdtiy, A.M., "June 27, 1770." 2 Compare tlie record of the Smnmrns of Richard Morris, in the preced- ing Note, with that of his appointment, in tlie Juunml of the CimveiUioii, " Die Merciirii, 9 ho , A.M., July :U, 1770." 3 Reference is made, in this place, to Gouverneur Morris ; and those who shall incline to know more of the subjects referred to, are referred to Doctor Sparks's Li/e of Gmeenienr 3f>iris, i., 154-101, in which, not- withstanding the evident purpose of the kind-hearted biographer to say as little in disparagement of the aristocratic culprit as possible, the careful reader will perceive the unceasing hankerings of that distin- guished "patriot," for the fleshpots of monarchy. * Vide page 188, ante. 'The instances of Bloomer Nelson, Samuel Haines, Josiah Disberry, and Jacob Schureman, residents ol Westchester county, {Jouninl nf the CoHveiili'm, "Thursday morning, August 29, 1776;" Petitum nf John Sure. Bloomer Neelmn, and others, " KiN(JSTO.V Goal, Feb'1 19"", 1777 " — Uitb>ric(il Manuscripts : I'elUions, xxxiii., G.'JS ; P- lition nf Jilnomer Nelson and three ollvrs, " Kincwton Goal, March 20, 1777 — Hislirical Manu- scripts, etc.,: Petitions, xxxiii,, 610.) are sufiicient for this purpose, although there are numerous others. • Jimnirti of Uie Couvenliin, " Die Sabbati, 9 ho , A.M., Augt. 17, 1776 tile PresitleiU of the Otuceuti'in to the Committee nf Vtster-county, " In Con- " VKXTION OF THK REPRESENTATIVES OK THE STATE Of NeW YoRK, "Harlem, Augt. 17, 1776 ;" etc. "The instances of Abraham C. Cuyler, John Duncan, Stephen I)e Lanccy, John Monier, and Beiuamin Hilton, already referred to, will be remembered by the reader. ^ It will be remembered that William Sutton of Mamaroneck was banished to Philadelphia. 32 "others "of the neighbouring States,'" — of course, the older-time repository of the victims of New York's "suspicion," at Litchfield, in Connecticut, was in- cluded ; — did not fail to receive their very welcome supply of well-to-do boarders. During the first three months of the existence of the Convention, there were thus lawlessly seized, of the residents of Westchester-county, William and John Sutton, of Mamaroneck ; " John Rogers, a ser- vant of Lewis Morris, of Morrisania ; Joseph Reade, of Westchester;'' Isaac Underbill, of Yon- kers," and Philip Palmer'* and James Horton, Junior,'" besides a number of others the names of whom were not recorded on the Journal of tlu Convention}' ^Journal of the CtminUlee of Sifetij^ "Saturday morning, Novr. 9, " 1776." ^0 J' ami ol of the Convention, " Die Jovis, 4 ho., P.M., July 18, 1776." " Vide page 375, ante. ^-Journal of the Couivntiioi, " Wednesday morning, Augt. 28, 1770 ; " the some, " Thureiiay morning, Augt. 29, 1770." 1' The Affidavit on which Joseph Reade was ordered to be arrested is such asingular production that we are induced to copy it. " DuToicESs ConNTV, ss. Abraham W. D. Peyster, being sworn, depos- "eth and saith that, on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, the fourth, " fifth, and sixth days of September instant, he w:i3 at New-Rochelle, in "the County of Westchester; that on one of the above-named days, he "heard, (as far as he can at present recollect, 1 either Theodosius Bartow, "of New-Roehelle aforesaid, or Anthony Abrahams, of the Town of " Westchester, in substance, say, in a conversation this Deponent bad " with the one or the other of them, on the American contest, that Jo- ".^eph Re.ade, late of the City of New- York, .Vttorney-at-Law, but, at "present, as this Deponent undei'stood, a resident in the Town of Weat- " Chester, was reputed a great Tor.v ; that the chief of bis, the said .lo- " sepli Readers, convereation Wiis of the Tory kind; and that he, the "said Joseph Reade, had reported that, in the late Battle on Long I»- "land, between the American Army and that of the King of Great " Britain, the .\mericans had lost either seven or fourteen thousand men. "(This Deponent cannot now recollect which of the two numbers was "mentioned, but rather thinks fourteen.) This Deponent further says, "tliat the amount of all he heard at New-Rochelle, at the time aforo- " said, respecting .loseph Reade, was, that the said Joseph Reade was a "great Tory and very unfriendly to the American cause, and further " this Deponent saith not. "A. W. D. Pkvstee. " Sworn before me, this 10th 1 Sept., 1770. J " Abm. Yates, June., President." That .\braham W. De Peyster was an employ-! of the Convention, in its work of making arrests and conveying the victims into exile, as a copyist, etc. ; and he was evidently an.xious for another job, of the same class, when he volunteered this singular testimony. But the Committee of Safety disappointed bis evident expectations, by transmitting the Affi- davit to the Committee of Westchester. county, *' with a letter requesting "them to proceed thereon," {Journal of the CommiU.ee of Safetij, "Die "Martis, 8 ho., A.M., Septr. 10, 1770.") ^* Journal of tlie Ommittee of Safety, " Die Luna?, 9 ho., .\.M., October "7, 1770." 15 Ibid. Journal of the Conrenlim, "Wednesday afternoon, July 17, 1776." " Rfa-oLVE» : That General Jlorris be ordered imnu'diately to appro- "hend and secure the persons ordered to be apprelu ndoil by this Con- " vention, yesterday, and that he be furnished with a list of those persons "nan»!S," {Journal of the Cmcentvoi, "Die Sabbati, 4 ho., P.M., Augt. '10, 1770.") .\s no such Order for the arrest of any one as is recited in the above Resolution appears in the published Journal of the Omventiim of the pre- ceding day, it is evident that this is one of those instances of arbitrary lawlessness, familiar to despots, of which the records are buried In secrscy. 378 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Those who were supposed to have been " disaf- " fected," whether they were really so or not, very much alarmed the Convention ; and the reports of the ill disposition of large portions of the inhabitants, in various parts of the State, were really and reasonably sufficient to create alarm, even among more resolute men than those of whom the Conven- tion was constituted. Those whom the Committees and the Congresses had persecuted and outraged and all whom their sufferings could influence, very naturally and very reasonably, were " disaffected," as the inhabitants of Staten-Ijiland had been : many, great numbers, of those who had honestly and earnest- ly opposed the Home Government and who had bold- ly demanded a redress of the Colonial grievances, were also " disaffected," when the fire-eaters' Heso- luHon of Independence was forced on them, nolens volens, as Colonel James Holmes, of Bedford, — who had represented Westchester-county in the Provincial Convention which had sent the Delegation of the Colony to the second Continental Congress; who had represented the County in the First Provincial Con- gress ; and who had commanded, throughout the en- tire Campaign of 1775, the Regiment of Troops in which were the Companies from the same County- was "disaffected," thereby. The greater number of those who had held places of honor and emolument, in the Colonial Government, notwithstanding it was politic to keep quiet, was also, more or less '' disaf- " fected;" and the multitude, whose timidity would not permit them to entertain a thought that Indepen- dence would be worth what it would evidently cost to secure it, was not very loud-toned in its favor, even if it did not, very often, lean toward " disaffection." Lastly, the inhabitants of the State, very generally, anxious only to attend to their business and their farms, without the distress and misery which a Civil War would necessarily produce, and seeing no ad- vantage to themselves or to their families by the violent overthrow of one Government and theequally violent establishment of another Government — the great majority, by far the greater number, if not the almost entire body, of the farmers of Westchester- county, was of that class — preferred to remain as they had been, before they had been outraged by the new regime; and, therefore, were classed as "disaffected." There was reason, therefore, for the more tender anxiety of the Convention, composed of those who were cowards by instinct, since " its chickens had "come home, to roost;" and, as we shall see, its anxiety was not relieved by what it was subsequently required to experience. Governor Tryon was enlist- ing as many as he could entice into the service of the King, both in New York and in other States ; * and 1 The Convention to the Continental (hngreis,- " In Contention of the " Representatives, etc., White-Piains, WESTCHESTER-couNTVj July "11, 1776;" the Journal of the Convention, " Friday moniing, Augt. "9, 1776 ; " Report of Committee on a more effectual mode of detecting and defeating the designs of the internal enemies of this State— Journal of the those who were "disaffected," in Westchester-coun- ty and elsewhere, were beginning to organize and to arm, for their own defence and, now and then, in support of the Royal cause.^ The Troop of Horse, in Westchester-county, of whom mention has been made, when a quota of its members A^as ordered for the reinforcement of the Continental Army, at New York, early in July, 1776, had refused to comply with the Order ;^ the Regiment of Westchester Mili- tia, commanded by Colonel Joseph Drake, of New Rochelle, also declined to be submitted to a Draft, for the same purpose, later in July;* it knew that very few of the Militia of that County could be ex- pected to enter the service, even for the protection of the County itself;^ and, on the earnest appeal of the friends of the Convention, in Salem and on Cort- landt's Manor, for the protection of the small revo- lutionary factions, there, from the greater number of those who were regarded as "disaffected, in those " portions of the County,"* a special Company of thirty men, to be commanded by Captain Samuel Delavan, and in addition to the similar Company commanded by Captain Micah Townsend, previously organized,' was necessarily ordered to be enlisted and established, at the expense of the State, for that particular ser- vice.* Even the authority of the Convention and that of the Committee of Safety of the State were disregarded by Captain Varian, of Westchester-county;' and there Convention, "Die Sabbati, 4 ho., P.M., Sept. 21, 1776;" and many others. Tlie instance of William Lounsbeny, who refused to surrender and was killed, while four of his recruits — Bloomer Nelson, Jacob Schure- man, Samuel Haines, and Joseph Turner — were captured, is noteworthy. Both Louneberry and his fourteen recruits were Westchester-county Loyalists ; and lie and they were intercepted in Westchester-county, by a party of Westchester-county Militia, on the twenty-ninth of August, 1776. (Journal of the Convention, "Thursday morning, Augt. 29, 1776 ;" Committee of Safety to General Washington, "In Committee of Safett, "Harlem, Augt. 30, 1776.") ^ The Committie of Safety to General Washington, "FiSHKILL, 10 Oc- "tober, 1776." A Corps of Westchester county Refugees was subsequently raised, the Lieutenant-colonency of which was taken by the veteran, James Holmes, of Bedford, already mentioned, (.4 Short Account of the Descent and Life of James Holmes, Esq., edit. 181.5, reprinted, in exienso, in de Lancey's Xoti-s to Jones's History of Xeic York dnring the HevolntUniary War, ii., 621.) Two Battalions of Loyalists were raised in Queens-county ; and in several of the other Counties, heavy enlistments were also made. ^Journal of the Convention, "Thursday afternoon, July 11, 177G;" the tame, "Die Veneris, 9 ho., A.M., July 26, 1776." * Colonel Joseph Drake to General Lewis Morris, " New-Rociiel, "July 24,1776;" Journal of the Convention, "Die Mercurii, 9 ho., A.M., "July 31, 1776;" Colonel Joseph Drake tn the President of the Conven- tion, *' New- Rochelle, 6th August, 1776 ; " Journal of the Conventitm, "Die Lunas, 9 ho., A.M., .\ugt. 5, 1770." S Information from G*'neral George Clinton to the Convention — Jmtrnal of the Onivenlion, " Tuesday morning, Augt. 13, 1776." ^ Thaddeus Crane to Major Joseph Benedict, "Salem, September 7, "1776;" Major Joseph Benedict to Qdonel Gilbert Drake, "Cortlasdt "Manor, 18 September, 1776;" Journal of tlie Convention, " Die Sab- "bati, 9 ho., A.M., Septr. 21, 1776." ' Vide pages 348-350, ante. ' Journal of the Convention, "Die Sabbati, 9 ho., A.M., Septr. 21, 1776." "Compare ./mmi.t; of the Committee of Safrty, " Kix<;s Bridge, Augt. "30, 1776," with the /ouriia/ of the Cmwenti/m, "Monday morning, Sep- " tember.30, 1776." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 379 was good reason for supposing, it was said, that a correspondence was kept up between the Royal Army, on Long Island, and prominent inhabitants of that County, as tar in the interior as the White Plains, as early as the close of August, in 1776.' The inhabit- ants of Kings-county were said, early in August, to "have determined not to oppose the enemy;" and a Committee was appointed, with considerable ostenta- tion, to go to that County, and to "inquire concern- " ing the authenticity of such report; and, in case "they find it well-founded, that they be empowered " to disarm and secure the disaffected inhabitants ; to " remove or destroy the stock of Grain ; and, if they "shall judge it necessary, to lay the whole County " was'e ; and, for the execution of these purposes, " they be directed to apply to General Greene, or the "Commander of the Continental Troops in that "Ciunty, for such assistance as they shall want;"' as if such a rash purpose would hate been permitted to be carried into effect, under such peculiar circum- stances, while the entire military and naval power of the King, in that part of the Continent, was resting within a mile of the proscribed County, and eager for a fight. Duchess-county, also, asked for further l)rotection from the aggressions of the " disaffected," as Westchester-county had done;' and, notwithstand- ing two Companies had been already raised for that I)urpose and were then in service,* a third Company was ordered to be added to the local force.* Like the Militia of Westchester-county, that of Duch- ess-county was exceedingly " disaffected," and would not be drafted;' and with the rashness and haughtiness of the despotism which it wielded, James Duane and John Jay being present, the Committee of Duchess-county, with its local military force, was directed to assist in enforcing the Order,' as if one who was thus forcibly crowded into the Army, after the manner of the Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel and the other Old World despots, would ever become a useful and effective soldier. The lower portions of Albany-county and the Manor of Livingston, also, asked for the enlistment and establishment of a local military force, for the only purpose of protecting the very few friends of the Convention who lived there, from the far greater number of the "disaffected" who also lived there; ^ and the measure of the anxiety of Journal of the CammUUe of Safeb), "Tuesday, A.M., Fiskill, Sep. "tembcr the 3rd, 1776 ;" Die Cmmittee of SnfHij to the Chairman of the Ommitlee nf Westcheslercnuiit)/, " FisHKlLL, Septembers, 1776." -Jourtfil of the Convention, '-Die Sabbati, 4 ho., P.M., Augt. 10, 1776." John Field and Jonathan Paddock to tite President of the Convention, "DncHESs, Sot;THE.\ST Precinct, 7th Oct.. 1776;" Journal of the Com- mittee of Sifety, " Die Slartis, 9 ho., A.M., Octr. 8, 1776." * Vide pages 348, 349, ante. 'Journal of the Committee, "Die Martis, Octo. 8th, P.M., 1776." ' [nformation given, personally, by Colonel Humphrey to the Conven- tion. (Journal of the Convention, " Saturday morning, September 28, 1776.") 'Journal of the Convention, "Saturday morning, Septeml)er 28, 177C." ^Jimnud of the Committee of Safety, "Die Martis, 9 ho.. A.M., Octo- "ber 8, 1776." See, also, S iin U'l T™ Broeck, Chaiimm, pro tern., to the Chnirmnn nf the Convention was completed by the submission of all Long Island, not excluding the peculiarly zealous revolutionary County of Suffolk, to the authority of the King." In view of these stern facts, there need be no wonder that the Convention was anxious, con- cerning the "disaffected;" and because of the purely speculative disposition of the Eastern Troops, and of the apathy, if not of the " disaffection," which pre- vailed in those of the Middle States, especially among those who were forced into the Army, unwilling sol- diers, from New York,'" there need be no wonder that General Washington, also, was anxious, not only concerning the "disaffected" who were within his own command, but concerning, also, those who were scattered throughout New York, in the rural districts as Well as within the Cities; " nor that he took unto himself the authority to seize and remove from their homes, some of those who were said to have been " disaffected," in many instances, those who had given their paroles and were honorably discharging their respective obligations of peace and quiet,'- among the former of whom was Frederic Philipse, of Yonkers, whose almost total blindness and entirely harmless life would have undoubtedly sheltered him, had not "a number of well-affected inhabitants" volunteered to a2 General Washington to Govemyr Trumbull, " New-York, 11 August, "1776;" the same tn the Oonvenlvin, "Head-quarters, New- York, 12 "August, 1776;" etc. General Washington to the CoavetUion, " Head-quartebs, New- York, "12 August, 1776." Parole of Frederic PhUipse, " Hartfobd, .\iig<. 28, 1776 ; " Petition of Frederic Philipse. " Middletown, 29"' Novr. 1776." 15 Frederic Philipse was taken into custody by an order from General Washington, on the ninth of August, and taken from his own house, at Yonkers, to New Rochelle, "where he was closely confined, under " guard, for eleven days," when he was removed to Connecticut, and gave his Parole that he would not go beyond the limits of the Town of Middletown, which no one pretends heattempted to violate. He re- mained there, until he was officially permitted to go into the City of New York, also on Parole. In the trick which was subsequently played on those who had been thus favored, by ordering them to return to Con- necticut, but in such a manner that it was evident tl>e Order would no( 380 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. stated that all these were " apprehended only on sus- " picion," * and that not on the personal knowledge of the General himself, but on information conveyed to him, unquestionably, by the notorious " Committee to " detect Conspiracies," who was then sitting in the City in which Head-quarters then were,^ the same hands directed the movement which had previously directed the similar movements with which the reader is already acquainted ; and the Convention was con- sistent when it thankfully acknowledged the great favor which it then enjoyed, in having received so welcome and so powerful an accession to its power for persecution, as General Washington and the Army of the Continent.^ Like the three Congressss who had preceded it, the Convention was kept busy, with matters pertaining to the Army. It authorized and superintended the enlistment of men, in the service of the State, for local purposes ; * it attended to that of men for the reinforcement of the Continental Army ; * and it pro- vided for the payment of Bounties, in addition to the stipulated pay, to those who thus enlisted.^ It resorted to Drafts, in order to ff]\ the requisitions for men, when enlistments were tardy;" and where resistance was made to the Draft, force was authorized, to compel men to fill the i-anks." It appointed Officers of both reach them, in the distant City, Mr. Philipse was included among the victims of somebody's official misconduct ; and, as the world knows, that unintentional failure to return to his place of confinement, in Connecti- cut, was made the ostensible reason for the confiscation of his great estate, in Westcliester-county and elsewhere. There is not the slightest evidence that Frederic Philipse was any- thing else than an honest friend of his native country; tliat he ever spoke or wrote or did anything whatever which could be justly con- strued as inimical to his country or favorable to the obnoxious meas- ures of tlie Home Government ; or that he ever piirposed doing so. He was almost totally blind ; and that and his unusual corpulency unfitted him for the slightest personal opposition to or supiiort of any political or military movements; while his fondness for gardouing, in all its branches, to which the grounds of his Jlanor-houses, at Yonkera and Sleepy Hollow, bore ample testimony, and bis domestic ties, and his un- usual love of home, led him to prefer the ipiiet and retired life for which he was distinguished, instead of that more active and more pub- lic life to which, from his rank and standing and purity of character, he was so completely entitled. ^General Washiugtnii bi G"rernor Tnimbull, "New-York, H .\ugust, "177C." 2 The Convention it^elf wa.*, then, sitting in the old Dutch Church at Harlem ; but the Generars correspondence, on the subject under consid- eration, had been, undoubtedly, with the Conunittee, who was nearer. See, also, Gtfiieral Wai^htu/jt/iii Ui Oeiu-ral M'Uluim Lirin(/titonj **nEAD- "yu.vRTKK.s, New-Yokk, July d, 1776, Five o'clock, P.M." s Tlie ConieiUion to General WasliiiigUm, " Tuesday, A.M., Augt. 13, "1776." *Jourtial of the Contenti'm, "Die Luna;, 8 ho., A.M., July 22, 1770 ;" the snme, " Die Martis, S ho., -\.M., July 23, 1776 ;" lite Coni-eHtion to the hepntatton iit the Conlinentnl Ckjttgref^, ** H-vri.em, 7 Augt., 1776 ;" etc. ^Jounml of the OmieiUivn, "Friday afternoon, July 19, 1776;" the $ame, "Die Sabbati, 4 ho., P.M., Augt. 24, 1776 ;" the same, "Saturday "morning, September 28, 177G ; " etc. ^Jonriial of the Comenlion, "DieLunfc, 9 ho., A.M., .luly 22, 17T6 ; " Journal of the Committee of Sofelij, " Ax the house of Me. Odell, Puil- "ii'se's Manor, Augt. 31, 1776 ;" etc. 'Journal of the Convention, "Friday morning, July 10, 1776;" the same, " Die Luna', 9 ho., A.M., July 22, 1776 ; " the xame, " Die Mercurii, "'.) ho., A.M.. July 31, 1776 ;" etc. Journal of the Convention, "Saturday morning. September 28. 1776." the Militia and the tr .ops in the field f it passed on the qualifications of the Surgical Staff and it gave em- ployment to Chaplains for the Army." Bargains were made with favored Officers, when they entered the service, conditioned that they should serve nowhere else than in the City of New York;'- and the settle- ment of disputes among Officers, concerning Rank, occupied much of its time and attention." It exempt- ed the Cavalry from the operations of a general Draft for men; and those who were employed in furnaces for smelting iron, in forges for making bar-iron, in steel-manufactories, in the anchor forge in Orange- county, in .saltworks, in paper-mills, and in powder- mills,'^ as well as those in aflaxseed-mill, in Duchess- county,'® and in the workshops of a gunsmith,'^ were, also, exempted from every kind of military duty. The Militia, of course, was the sole dependence of the Convention, in every emergency ;'^ and, whether well- disposed or •'disaffected'"' — it seemed to be equally ''Journal of the Convention, "Friday morning, July 16, 1776;" the tame, "Die Sabbati 9 ho., A.M , July 27, 1770 ; " the same, " Die .Sabbati, "9 ho., A. M., Augt. 17, 1776 ;" etc. vjrntrnalnf the Convention, "Tuesday, P.M., White Pl.\ins, July 9, " 1776 ; " the same, " Die Sabbati, 3 ho., P.M., July 27, 1776 ; " the same. "Tuesday afternoon, Augt. "20, 1776 ; " etc. 11 Journal of the Convention, •' .Monday morning, Augt. 26, 1776." ^- Journal of the Convention, " Die Mercurii, 4 ho., P.M., July 31, 1770." '^Journal of the Convention, "Tuesday, P.M., White Pl.iix.'S, July 9, "1770;" the same, "Die Luna-, 9 ho., .\.M., July 22, 1770— the case of "Colonel Drake against Colonel Thomas ; " the same, " Tuesday morning, "Augt. 13, 1770;" etc. n Jbanin! nf the Convention, " Die Mercurii, 9 ho , A.M., Augt. 7, 1776." 15 Jouninl of the Vuncention, "Die Mercurii, 9 ho., A.M., August 14, " 1776." Joimml of the Convention, 'Monday morning, August '26, 1776." ^'Journal of the Committee of Safety, " Wednesday morning, Septr. 25, "1776." 1* The authorities are so numerous, that no attempt will be made to cite any of them. 10 The following, in addition to what hiis been already stated concerning the disaffection in the Continental .\rmy, presents the subject, very clearly. The Militia of Westchester-county contiiined, of course, all who were frierds of the Convention and who lived within the County ; but the number of efficient men in the entire Brigade did not exceed the strength of a single Regiment and these were so generally "disaffected," either with the service or with the General commanding them, or with both, that the latter regiirded his own life as in danger, among them ; and, therefore, when he was oniered to take the command of his Brigade, personally, in Kew York, he preferred to remain in Philadelphia, where he would be less exposed : "The situation of my Brigade I was con- "vinced was well known to the Convention," were his words. "I ap- " prebend that not more than a Colonel's command was left in it ; and " as such did not think my presence was so absolutely necessary. I have "thought that the existence of such a Brigade, in which were so many "dis;ilTected persons, was dangerous to the cause as well as to my own ■' life ; but being desirous to participate in the virtuous opposition to the "British tyrant, I had determined, as soon as possible, to join General "^Vashiiigton. and contribute my assistance to him." {General Letoit Morris to the Convention " Phil.ioelphu, Septr. 24, 1776.") The reader may learn from this how very little the Slorrises were re- spected, even among those who were under legal obligations to respect them, in and throughout Westchester-county, in the Summer of 1776. The following will further illustrate the "disaffection" of the Militia of Westchester-county, a reasonable result of the outrages which had been officially perpetrated throughout that County, during many months preceding: " We suppose your Excellency has taken the necessiiry steps " to prevent their landing of any men from the ships, should they be so ' inclined, as no reliance at all can be placed on the Militia of West- " chester-county." {The Committee of Safely tn General Washinrjlon. "FiSHKiLL, 10th Octr., 1776.") THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 381 relied on, no matter what its temper might be — it was drawn into the service, while the other States were delinquent,' until no more could be taken, for any, except for the most tcmjjorary, purposes.' It was called out to guard the banks of the Hudsoy-river^ and those of Long Island Sound.* Reinfbrcemcuts of the Continental Army were taken from it, whenever reinforcements were called for;' the passes in the Highlands were constant sources of anxiety ; * and the northern borders of the State' and Long Island' also enjoying its protection. Sometimes it was em- ployed to drive Cattle to places of supposed safety:* sometimes it was employed in repairing roads : some- I " We (.an with pleasure assure you, that by far the greater part of " the levies ordered by tlie Congress to be raised from our Slilitia, are "completed, and at their several stations; that almost the whole of those "drafted in consequence of the enclosed Eesoluticu, will, by the time " this reaches you, be at posts which is thought necessary to occupy, "least the enemy should cut off the conmiuuication between the Army at " New York aiul the country." * * * " It gives us great pain to in- " form you that the aid received from our sister States is very inadequate "to our expectations, none of them having yet completed the levies di- " rected by Congress, which leaves us reason to fear that instead of using "every means that human wisdom dictatesfor ensuring success, we shall, " with inferior numbers, on the doubtful issue of a single battle, hazard " the glorious cause for which we have struggled." (77ie Convinilion to the Deltijiitiim of the State in the Cotdinetdal Congress, " Hahlem, 7th .\u- "gust, 17-C, A.M.") - The CutivenlioH to General Washington, "Fishkiii., 10th Octr., ITTfi." "The entire body of Westchcster-connty Slilitia was ordered to the mouth of the Croton-river, to ojijiose any movements, in that County, from the enemy's shipping, [Journal of the Convetilion, "Thursday morn- " ing, July 25, 1776 ; ") to which the local Company, commanded by Cap- tain Micah Townsend, was added, on the following day, (tlie same. '-Die " Veneris, 9 ho., A.M., July 26, 1776.") The entire body of the Militia of Westchester-county was again called out. for the same purpose, with five days' provisions, a fortnight afterwards, (the snyne, "Die Sabbati, 4 " ho., I'.M., Augt. 10, 1776 ") The Militia of Orange-county, below the Highlands — now Rockland-county— was ordered out for the protection of the western shore of the river, early in the Autumn, (the same, " Thui-sday afternoon, October 10, 1776.") ♦General Morris was instructed to guard the Sound-shore of Westches- ter-county, at the same time that he guarded the left bank of the Hud- son. (Journal of theConrention, " Die Sabbati, 4 ho., P.M., Augt. 10, 1776.") See, also. Colonel Joseph Drake to the Com-enlion, "Wednesday morn- ing, .\ngt. 28, 1776;" the t'oncenlion' s reply, "Thursday morning, " Augt. 2!), 1770." 'One-fourth of the entire body of the Militia of Westchester, Duch- ess, Ulster, and Orange-counties, to serve until the last day of the fol- lowing December, was ordered out for general service, in July, (Jour- no/ of the Convention, "Friday morning, July 10, 1776;" the same, "Die "Jovis, 4 ho., P.M., Augt. 8, 1776 ;") one-fifth of the entire body of the Militia of .Vlbany-county, to serve for one month, and one-half of that of Kings and Queens counties, to serve until the first of September, were added to these, very soon after, (/*<• same, " Die Sabbati, 4 ho.. P.M., " Augt. 1(1, 1770 ;") and, a few da.ys later, the entire bwly of the .Alilitia of Orange, Ulster, Westchester, and Ducliess-rountics was ordered to hold itself in readiness to march, at a moment's warning, with five days' provisions and as much ammunition as possible, (Journal of the CommilUe of SafHij. "H.VRLESI, Augt. 29, 1770.") * The entries on this subject are so very numerous that we can pretend to cite no more than two or three of them, (J, 9 ho., A.M., Augt. 19, "1776 ;" Journal of the Conven/iim, "Thursday afternoon, July II, "1776;" the rn/ne, "Thursday nu>rning, July IS, 1770;" the same," Diu "Sabbati, 9 ho, A M., Octor. 5, 1776;" Uie same, "Die Sabbati, 9 ho., ".VM., July 27, 1770;" etc. ^0 Journal of Oie Convention, "Die Jovis, 9 ho., .\.M., Septr. 19, 1776." " Journal of the Convention, " Saturday morning, July l:!, 1776." 18 Jfninin/ of the Convention, '-Thursday morning, July 18, 1770 ;" the tame, '■ Die Sabbati, 9 ho., A M., July 27, 1776 ; " the same, " Die Luna;, "9 ho., .\.M., Augt. .1, 1776 ; " etc. "Journal or" .") Models were made from Spears procured in New York, {the same, " Die Luna>, 11 lio., A M., " Sept. 9, 1776 ; ") and, including the long handles, five shillings and six- pence was paid for those which were not steeled, and six shillings and six-pence for those which were steeled, {Journnl of the Convention, "Die " Jovis, 9 ho., A.M., Octor. 3, 1770.") We have not met the slightest notice of the use of those four thousand Lances, in the service or elsewhere ; and it is more than probable that they were never used, by any one. 1 Journal of ihe Coni'enlion," Die Mercurii, 9 ho., A.M., Aug. '21, 177C ; " etc. 2 Journal of the Convention, "Die Mercurii, 9 ho , A.M., August 14, 1770." ^Journal of the Convention, " Die Sabbati, 9 ho., A.M., Septr. 21, 177C." * Jonnml of the Convention, " Monday morning. September 30, 1776 ; " Journal of the Committee of Safetii, "Die Luna;, 9 ho., A.M., October 7, " 1776;" Ihe same, "Die Mercurii, 9 ho., A.M., Octr. 9, 1776; tlie same, " Thursday morning, (tctor. 17. 1776 ;" etc. Stephen Ward, Gilbert Strang, and Phil. Leake were appointed to pur- chase coarse woollen Cloth, Linsey-woolsey, Blankets, woollen Hose, Mittens, coarse Linen, felt Hats, and Shoes, for the soldiers, and to have the Linen made up into Shirts, all in Westchester county ; and three hun- dred pounds— seven hundred and fifty dollars — were appropriated for that purpose. {Jnnraul of the OmimiUeeuf Safetij, ''Die Mercurii, 9 ho., A.M., " Octr. 9, 1776.") Although there were supplies of Grain much nearer to the Army, and vastly more exposed to the enemy's foraging parties, no Grain was purchased elsewhere than in the Livingston Manor, from which three thousand bushels of Oats, at four shillings per bushel, and four thousand bushels of old Corn and one thousand bushels of Rye, the two latter at five shillings per bushel, were drawn, at one time ; but Peter R. Livingston was President of the Convention, and Gilbert Liv- ingston and .lames Livingston and Philip Livingston and Robert R. Liv- ingston and James Duane and John Jay and Pierre A'an Cortlandt — the last-named three having been Livingstons by their marriages — were members of that Convention ; and six of them were present when the order was given. {Journal of the Convenlimx, " Monday morning, Septem- " ber 30, 1776.") Need there be any surprise that, with such an array of strong men in its favor, that he more distant and less exposed Manor of Livingston should be chosen, especially since the purchasing agent of the Quarter- master-general of the Continental Army was at Fishkill, with funds to meet the drafts of Dirck Jansen, who was selected by the Convention, to gather the grain from the farmers or from the manorial storehouses, and, also, especially since no inspection of either the quantity or the quality of what was to be thus purchased, was provided for. 5 Journal of the Commiilee of Safety, " Friday morning, September 27, " 177G." received the dilatory and half-hearted attention of the Convention — an abridgement of their existing des- potic authority was opposed by the Deputies who then exercised it ; * and there was a lingering, longing de- sire, among the master-spirits of the Convention, for a reconciliation with the Mother Country and a restora- tion of the former form of Colonial Government, evidently with themselves and their friends adminis- tering it.' The subject was introduced into the Convention, very properly, on the day after that body had approved and accepted the Declaration of Independence ; but the consideration of it was postponed, from time to time, until the first of August, when a Committee was appointed for the purpose of taking into consid- eration and reporting apian for instituting and fram- ing a Form of Government, together with a Bill of Rights, ascertaining and declaring the essential Rights and Privileges of "the good people of this State," as a foundation for such Form of Government, with instruc- tions to report to the Convention, on the twenty-sixth 6 As late in the year as the early days of October, the attempt of the County-clerk of Duchess-county to continue the old practice of holding a County Court for that County was formally forbidden by the Conven- tion, John Jay, James Duane, and Robert R. Livingston having been present in the Convention, 'Journ i; of the Convention, " Die Sabbati, 9 ho., "A.M., Octor. 5, 1776.") ' There need be no better evidence of that fact, although there is an abundance, elsewhere, than in the successive orders for th« issue of Bills of Credit, by the Convention, It continued to issue such Bills, in the name of the Colony, long after it had professed to accept the Declaration of Independence, by which it had ceased to be a Colony, {Journal of the Contention, "Die Mercurii, 9 ho., A.M., Augt. 7, 177G ") and, subse- quently, when a new issue of such Bills of Credit was ordered to be printed, (Journal of the Convention, " Die Martis, 5 ho., P.M , August 13, "1776 ") it was ordered to be printed with the insignia of the Corpora- tion of the City of New York, {Ibid ;) and the engravers of the several plates were instructed to leave a blank space where the name of the maker of the obligation should be, on those plates, in order that such name as should be subsequently found to be most useful — the Colony, the State, the City, or something else— might be inserted, with type, after the sheets should have been printed on the plate press— conclusive evidence that the permanence of the new-formed State was regarded by even the master spirits of the Convention, as very questionable. In the same connection, it may be well to inquire and to consider what the Earl of Coventry meant, when, in his place in the House of Lords, on the twenty-fifth of November, 1779, he said, " He lamented that a "War so fatal to Great Britain should ever have been begun, much more " that it should be continued with so much obstinacy; and declared that, "had the House paid attention to the propositions which he, the last "Sessions, informed them he was authorized to make from two persons "of authority and influence, in .\merica, and which, had they been " listened to, by Parliament, and agreed to, would have been ratified by "Congress, we should have been, at this hour, in peace with America." — Speech of the Rirl of Coventry, in the House of Lords, in Almon s Parlia- mentary Register, xv., 17. " The last Sessions." during which the Earl of Coventry, by authority, presented overtures for reconciliation to which the Continental Congress would have agreed, was the Fifth Session of the Fourteenth Parliament of Great Britain, (November 26, 1778, to July .3, 1779,) long after the alliance of the United States with France had been perfected, and utilized in America. As the Earl, on another occasion, boldly acknowl- edged his personal friendship and coriespondence with more than one of those who, then, were regarded as prime leaders in the Rebellion, there need be very little trouble in searching for the names of those who were, undoubtedly, the mouthpieces of the Continental Congress, in the work of reconciliation, on the occasion referred to by the Earl of Coventry, in 1779. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 383 of August, less than four weeks from the date of its appointment.' The Committee who was appointed for those purposes consisted of John Jay, Colonel John Broome, and General John Morin Scott, all of the City of New York; John Sloss Hobart and William Smith, of Suffolk ; Abraham Yates, Junior, and Robert Yates, of Albany-county ; Henry Wisner, Senior, and Colonel Charles De Witt, of Ulster-county ; William Duer, of Charlotte-county ; Gouverneur Morris, of Westchester-county ; Samuel Townshend, of Queens- county; and Robert R. Livingston, of Duchess-county.'' The subject continued to be played with, both by the Committee and the Convention, by both of whom nothing was done, until the Royal Army occupied the City of New York and prepared to extend its operations into Westchester-county, when other subjects occupied the attention of both ; and thus were the best interests and the safety of the inhabitants of the State endangered — thus were their properties and their families and everything which was dear to them, subjected to the hazard of a revo- lutionary uprising, of anarchy, and of entire de- struction — only because James Duane and John Jay and the Livingstons and the Morrisses and their friends preferred a reconciliation and a reconstruction of the former system of Government, with themselves in the offices; and, for the promotion of those selfish purposes, withheld every form of Government from the youngState, and exposed every one and everything, within the State, to lawless anarchy and entire ruin. There was scarcely a matter, in either the Judicial or the Legislative or the Executive departments of (Tovernment, with which that Congress did not in- terfere ; ^ and it ventured to ask the Continental Con- gress, only because it lacked courage enough to do so, to revise the Book of Common Prayer and to exercise an official censorship over the prayers of those who did not use Rituals.* I Jounuil of th» Contention, " Die Jovis, 8 ho., A.M., August 1, 1776." »Ibid. ' without entering into details, the Convention provided for the refu- Kee Poor, from tlie City of New Yorli ; protected the Cattle of the farmers, from the eneniy'8 foraging parties, aa far as it could do so ; guarded the Militar)--stores of the State ; built Vessels-of-War ; obstructed the navi- gation of the iludson river ; arbitrarily set aside the Elections of OfRcere who were distasteful to it ; borrowed Money, whenever they could find lenders; treated with the Indians ; issued Paper-currency ; gave employ- ment to grumbling Mechanics ; watched the "disaffected," in New Jer- sey ; lent Money to impecunious County Committees ; guarded the official Rcconls ; ordered Kasts; gave Passes to those making journeys ; seized the Royal Quitrents ; removed those who were exposed to the enemy; provided postal facilities ; gave Licenses to Innkeepers; gave relief to insolvent Debtors ; provided for the care of Orphans; relieved distressed Soldiei's; etc , etc. The JoumaU of the Convention and those of Its Committee of Safely may be referred to, by those who shall desire further information concerning the action of the Convention or the Committee, thereon. *"We take the liberty of suggesting to your consideration, also, the "propriety of taking some measures for expunging from the Boitk of "Common Prayer, such parts, and discontinuing in the Congregations "of all other denominations, all such prayers, as interfere with the in- "terest of the .\nierican c^use. It is a subject we are afraid to meddle "with, the enemies of .\merica having taken great pains to insinuate " into the minds of the Episcopalians that the Church was in danger. While the Convention was thus busily employed — and justice reiuires that its industry and determina- tion, in preparing for a successful opposition to the Royal Armies, on the northern frontiers as well as in the vicinity of New York, should be fully and prop- erly recognized — other events of the utmost impor- tance to New York and to her sister States, were of everyday occurrence. As we have already stated, the Royal troops which had been withdrawn from Boston and carried to Halifax, during the preceding March, "having suffi- " ciently recovered from the fatigues and sickness "occasioned by their confined situation in that town" [7?os Lord George Germaine, " Staten Island, 8 July, "1776; " the same to the same, "State.n Island, 6 August, I77fi ; " General Washington to General Clinton, " Head -qua RTEKS, New "York, 12 July, 1776;" the same to the President of Covgreis, "New "York, 14 July, 1776;*' the same to General Schuyler, "New York, 15 "July, 1776;" Memoirs of Major-'/eneral Heath, Ed. Boston, 1798, 49; [Hall's] History of the CiciUVur in America, i., 183, 186 ; Guriion's Iffstorj; of the American Revolution, ii, ."JOi. " The Convention of New Yurk to General Washington, " Saturday morn- " ing, July 13,1776;" [Hall's] History of the Civil War in America, i., 185; Gordon'' B History of the American Revolution, il.. SU-l. 3 Report and Evidence in the Case of Lieutenant-colonel Hammond, — Historical Manuscripts: Miscellaneom Papers, xxxiv., 549. *The Convention to General Washington, " Saturday Morning, July 13, " 1776." 6 The Convention to General Washington " In Convention, July 15,1776." ^ The Cottvenlion to General H'us/ii/ijtoH, " Saturday morning, July 13, " 1776." "t General Washington to John AuguMine Washington, "New York, 22 " July, 1776." Clinton, then commanding the Militia who had been called out for the protection of the passes over the Highlands, to desire General Ten Broeck, command- ing the Militia above the Highlands, to march down with as great a force as he could collect, in order the more effectually to secure those passes, particularly the road which passed over Anthony's Nose ; and, at the same time, he authorized General Clinton, if there should seem to be any danger from those who were "disaffected," to send an express to Connecticut, desiring the western portion of that State " to col- " lect all their forces at the same point." ' As we have already stated, the Convention of the State, then seated at the White Plains, besides sending ad- vices of the threatened inroad to the officer command- ing the fort in the Highlands, also sent a supply of {>owder and ball to the inhabitants of Tarrytown, and provided for reinforcements, " along that shore," and solicited protection for King's Bridge, "the destruction "of which it apprehended to have been an object " with the enemy." ' On the fourteenth of July, General Washington wrote to the Convention a letter which is so signifi- cant of the great anxiety which he felt and so highly illustrative of his character, as a great commander, that we make room for it, in this i)lace. " New-York Head-quarter.s. "July 14th, 1776. " GextlExMEN : — " The passage of the enemy up the North-river is " an event big with many consequences to the public "interest. One particularly occurs to me well deserv- "ing your attention, and to prevent which I shall "gladly give every assistance in my power, consistent "with the safety of the Army. " I am informed there are several passes, on each "side of the river, upon which the communication "with Albany depends, of so commanding a nature " that an inconsiderable body of men may defend " them against the largest numbers. It may be that, " on board these ships, there may be troops for that " purpose, who, expecting to be joined by the disaft'ect- "ed, in that quarter, or confiding in their own " strength, may endeavour to seize those defiles, in " which case the intercourse between the two Armies, "both by land and water, will be wholly cut off, than "which a greater misfortune could hardly befall the " Province and Army. I must entreat you to take " the measure into consideration, and, if possible, " provide against an evil so much to be apprehended. " I should hope the Militia ofthose Counties might be " used on such an emergency, until further provision " was made. " I have also thought it very probable these ships * General Washington to General George Clinton, " Head-qvaiiters, " New York, 12 July, 1776." ''The Convention to General Washington, "Saturday morning, July 13, " 1776." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 385 "may have carried up arms and ammunition to be " dealt out to those who may favour their cause, and " c()()j>erate with them, at a fixed time. I would, to "guard against tliis, submit to your consideration the "propriety of writing to the leading men, on our "side, in those Counties, to be very vigilant in ob- " serving any movement of that kind, in order that "so dangerous a scheme may be nipped in the bud; " for that purpose, to keep the utmost attention to " tiie conduct of the princi|vil Tories in those parts, "any attempts of intercourse with the ships, and all " other circumstances which may lead to a discovery "of their schemes and the destruction of their meas- " ures. " I am. Gentlemen, very respectfully, " Your nu). obt. ami very hble. servant, " Geo. \Va81iin(;ton. " To THE HONBLE. THE rUEHT. OF THE " Provincial Congress of New- York." As we have said, the inhabitantjs of the vicinity of Tarry town turned out for the purpose of obstructing any attempt which might be made, to effect a landing from the ships ; ' but they were farmers, in the midst of their harvest; and when they had been there three days, without having seen much pressing necessity for their further stay or any prospect of a relief or of a supply of provisions, although the Convention was sitting within six miles from them, they expressed their desire to be relieved, and some of them went home, without leave, "in order to attend to their liar- " vests." - Very ungraciously and, certainly, not in such words as were calculated to inspire respect for those who had employed tlicm, among those against whom they were thus tossed, by the aristocratic master- spirits of the Convention,^ Orders were issued to Ca|)tain Micali Townsend, who had probably been sent from the Plains to Tarrytown, on the day after the arrival of the shi[)s, to remain at the latter place, with his Company; Colonel Thomas was ordered to seiul detachments from his Regiment, to relieve those who had not returned to their homes; and the pay and rations allowed to the Continental troops, were promised to those who were, as well as to those wlio should be, called into the service.' But, on the fol- lowing day, lJu/ij 10, 1776,] all those in the neighbor- hood of Tarrytown were relieved from immediate danger, by the ships and their tenders weighing their anchors and sailing up the river, occasionally firing a shot, as they pa.ssed a house on the western side the river; and by their anchoring a short distance below Verplanck's-point, and " oj)posite the stores at Hav- ■ Viile l>i»ee 384, ante. ^jDUrnal of the Conrniliim, "Die Ijiina-, P.M., .Inly 1.% 177ri." 3 The C'>»fe»lion lo Limtentntt-coloncl Hnmmniui^ " In Convkntion for " THE State of New- York, White Plains, .July l.l, 1776." *Jnurnaln/ the Coiiviilion, "Die Luu.t, P.M., July 15, 1776 ;" tlie ConveiUion to Lieitteiiaut-cnlouel Hfimmond^ " Is Convention for the "State of New- York, White Plains, July 15, 1776." 33 "erstraw." During the afternoon of the same day, one of the tenders beat up the river, against an unfa- vorable wind, sounding the river very carefully as she proceeded, until she had come within gun-shot of Fort Montgomery, when her progress was arrested by a thirty-two pound shot, which struck her, and compelled her to put about, and to run down the ri\er, not, however, without having plundered a little house which stood near the river.* During the morning of that day, [^■Talij 1(5, 1776,] before the intbrmation of the dejjarture of the ships from Tarrytown had reached the Convention, that body had provided for the removal of " all Provisions and " other Stores, as well private as public i)roperty, which "were stored in i)laccs within the district of Peekskill " and so situated as to be in danger of being taken by " the enemy," " to such places of safety as the Sub- " committee of Peekskill shall think i)roper ;" and when the information of the departure of the ships was received from Lieutenant-colonel Hammond, the Convention very j)romptly despatched Colonel Pierre Van Cortlandt and Zephaniah Piatt, the former a Deputy from Westchcstcr-county and the latter one from Duchess-county, " to the Highlands, in order to " call out such Militia as they may think necessary for "the defence and security of this State; to direct " their stations ; to reinfcux'e the garrisons of Forts "Montgomery and Constitution, if expedient; and to "supply such forces as may be called out or to ap- " point proper persons for that purpose;" at the same time, promising Continental pay and rations to the Militia who should be thus employed; and advancing five hundred dollars, to be disposed of in procuring Provisions for the forces who should thus be called into active service." The Convention fnrther signified, at the same Session, its determination to protect the State, as far as it could do so, by ordering into imme- diate service, one-fourth of the entire body of Militia of the Counties of Westchester, Duchess, Orange — which then included what is now known as Rockland —and Ulster-counties, " for the defence of the liber- " ties, proi)erty, wives, and children of the good peo- '' pie of this State ; and as, at this busy season of the " year, the service may be inconvenient to many of " them, each man be allowed twenty dollars, as a " Bounty, with Continental pay and subsistence, and " be continued in the service until the last day of " December next, unless sooner discharged." At the same time, the men to be raised in AVestchester and Duchess-counties were ordered to repair, immediately, to Peekskill ; General Wiishington was reiiuested to appoint an officer to take command of all the levies to be raised, on both sides the river ; to designate what stations they should occupy ; and to nominate two Deputy Commissaries for the troops, on each side ^ LievlenwiU-coloncl Hammond to the Comeation, "Tahbvtown, July "Ifi, 1776;" General Clinton to General Wathimjlon, "Fort Montoom- " r.RV, J>ily 23, 1776." * Journal of the Convention, " Friday morning, July 16, 1776." 386 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of the river; and those who were already in the service, from Orange and Ulster-counties, were order- ed to be posted in the Highlands, to guard the defiles, therein, which were westward from the Hudson-river, as General Clinton should direct. The provisions of these enactments were completed by the appointment of Colonel Thomas Thomas as the Colonel-command- ing and Ebenezer Purdy as the Major, of the troops which were to be drawn from Westchester-county ' — an appointment of Colonel which was made in the hurry of the moment and under a misapprehension, the Convention having erroneously supi)Osed Colonel Thomas was the senior Colonel of the Westchester- county Militia, whereas the seniority rested on Colonel Drake ; and which Election, subsequently, produced a serious rupture in the military circles of the County, and between the two rivals and their respec- tive friends," since Colonel Thomas resolutely retained the authority which he had thus received by mistake.'' A guard of fifty men was also provided for the pro- tection of the public stores of Provisions, at or near Peekskill ; * and the Commissioners for building the Continental Ships, at Pcmghkeepsie, were requested to exert their utmost abilities and attention to defend those Ships from the hostile attempts of the enemy, and, if nothing else, to preserve the Oak-plank, Rig- ging, and other Stores from falling into his hands.^ In the afternoon of the same day, \_Ji'hj 16, 177(5,1 the Convention appointed a secret Committee "to de- " vise and carry into execution such measures as to " them shall appear most eflfectual for obstructing " the channel of Hudson's-river, or annoying the en- " amy's ships in their navigation up the said river ; " and that this Convention pledge themselves for de- " fraying the charges incident thereto." That Com- mittee was composed of John Jay, of the City of New York, Robert Yates, of Albany-county, Major Chris- topher Tappen, of Ulster-county, William Paulding, of Westchester-county, and Robert R. Livingston and Gilbert Livingston, both of Duchess-county. At the same time, a messenger was ordered to be sent to Gov- ernor Trumbull for the purpose of requesting him to order the forces of western Connecticut to be called out, for the further support of those who were occu- pying the passes in the Highlands ; * a Resolution, 1 Joumal of the Convention, " Friday morning, July 16, 1776." 2 Joumal nf the Convention, '■ Die Lunae, 9 lio., A.M., .luly 22, 1776 ; " the same, " Die Luna>, 4 ho., P.M., July 22, 1776 ; " Colonel Joseph Drake 1(1 the Coiivenlion, " Wuur. Plains, 23 July, 1776 ;" the same to General Morris, "New KorHEL, July 24, 1776 the same to the Conven- tion, "New RdrnEi.LE, 6 August, 1776." ^Preamble and UesoUUion of the Convention, "Die Luiiji-, 4 ho., P.5[., "July 22. 1776." * 77ie Convention to Colonel Pierre Van Cortlnntlt, " In Cosventio.v ok " THE Kepresentatives of the State of New-Yiiek, White Plains, "July 16, 1776." ^The Cimvention to Jacobus Van Zandt, in his ahfience, trt the Capttiins Lawrence and Tnder, or either of them, at Pottkeepsie, "In Convention "of the Representatives of the State of New-Yohk, White Plains, "July 16, 1776." It appears that it was subsequently considered advisable to send a requesting " all Magistrates and other officers of jus- " tice in this State, who were well affected to the liber- "ties of America, until further orders, to exercise their " respective offices," was adopted; and the Convention also adopted Resolutions declaring that "all persons " abiding within the State of New Y^ork and deriving " protection from the Laws of the same, owe Allegiance " to the said Laws, and are members of the State ; that " all persons passing through, visiting, or making a " temporary stay in the said State, being entitled to " the protection of the Laws, during the time of such " passage, visitation, or temporary stay, owe, during " the same time, Allegiance thereto ; and that all " persons, members of or owing Allegiance to this " State, as before described, who shall levy War " against the said State, within the same, or be adher- " ent to the King of Great Britain or others the ene- " mies of the said State, within the same, giving to " him or them, aid and comfort, are guilty of Treason " against the State, and being thereof convicted, shall "suffer 'the pains and penalties of Death!"'. The Convention also " earnestly recommended to the Gen- " eral Committees of the Counties and the Sub-Com- " mittees in the Districts of the several Counties in " this State, immediately to apprehend and secure all Ooniniittee of the Convention, instead of a letter by the hands of a Jlessenger ; and Colonel John Broome, of New York City, and William Duer, of Charlotte-county, were selected for that purpose. {General Washinijlon to the President of the Continental Comjress, " New York, 19 "July, 1776." ) ■ These Resolutions are almost identical with other Re.solutions, of the same tenor, which had been adopted by the Continental Congress, on the twenty-fourth of June preceding, {ritle parji's 3.i.5, 3.56, ante;) but, be- cause of the Bubsei|uent abrogation of all the Laws of the Colony, and because no other Laws had been enacted, even provisionally, to take their places, the truth was. that, on the day of the adoption of these Resolutions, by the Convention, there were no Laws, of any kind, in force, within the State, nor any Courts to try offenders, of any kind; and the Resolutions were, therefore, practically, mere buncombe, mean- ing nothing. But the ridiculousness of the Resolutions was not confined to their allusions to Laws which had been formally abrogated and to Courts which had been as formally abol shed. Obedience to the Laws, had there been any Laws, would have been truly due from every one within the limits of the Stati; ; but that was something which was entirely distinct from Allegiance, which was not due to the Laws but to the Sovereign to whose supieme authority the person was legally subject, and from whom even the Laws themselves, had there been any, had derived all the authority which they could have pos- sibly possessed. Treason has always consisted, and still consists, of something else than a mere misdemeanor or a simple felony ; and the subject of another .Sovereign, although a violator of the lex loci, to which he properly owed obedience, could not, then nor since, have been legally tried and convicted of Treason, for any such violation of the local Law, in the State of New York or elsewhere, else, under these Resolu- tions, every officer and soldier of the Royal Army, whether British or Irish or German, who were within the State of New Y"ork, on and alter the sixteenth of July, 1776, were Traitoi-s "against the State." liable to be tried for that very capital offence, and to "sufl'er the pains and " penalties of Death," therefor. The Convention, in its eagerness to secnr* the State, made itself ridiculous by the passage of such Resolutions, especially since it was exercising despotic authority, unrestrained by any Law, and needed no such Resolution as a warrant for declaring any one, no matter whom, either with or without a reason, to have been a traitor, and to have hung and quartered him after the most approved fashion of despots, had it inclined to have done so. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 387 ' such persons, whose going at large, at this critical " time, they shall deem dangerous to the Liberties of " this State ;" ' and the measure of its zeal was filled by asking a loan from General Washington, for the payment of what it had undertaken to do, promising to '• take the earliest care to replace what nothing " but urgent necessity would have induced it to bor- " row ;" by requesting him to send an immediate sup- ply of Ammunition for the troops who were already in motion and " but ill-supplied " with that very nec- essary article ; by expressing a fear to him that the enemy would attempt " to cut oft" the communication " between the City and country, by landing above " Kingsbridge," and its desire to " have some force " ready to hang on his rear, in case such a step should " be taken ;" and by suggesting to the General, also, that if Governor Trumbull would form a Camp of six thousand men, at Byram-river, the westernmost limit of Connecticut, any designs which the enemy might have, to land above Kingsbridge, would become " ex- " tremely hazardous." - While the Convention was thus bravely and, gener- ally, with excellent judgment, employed in making preparations for a vigorous and effective resistance, whatever tlie purposes of the enemy may have been. General Clinton, then at Fort Montgomery, as we have already seen, not only welcomed one of the en- emy's tenders, which was beating up the river, taking soundings as siie went, with a thirty-two pound shot, which caused her to i)Ut about and run down the river, to the place where the shii»s had anchored ; but he also made preparations for the removal of all the goods, from the storehouses, and all the Cattle, Sheep, etc., from the farms which were contiguous to the river, to place-sof safety ; and, on the following day, \_Julij 17, 177p]ies ; and that, really, they were sent up to sound, not only the river but the inhabitants of the Fhilipsborough and the Cortlandl Manors, on the eastern bank of the river, and, to some extent, those of Orange-county, below the mountains, on the western bank, as to their disposition to declare themselves favorable to the Royal cause. The vigi- lance with which the AVestchester-shore of the river was generally watched and the extreme backwardness of even those who had been outraged by the County and Town Committees, to abandon their fsimilies and their homes, even in retaliation or because of their honorable loyalty t(» their Sovereign, were so pain- fully evident, however, that (reneral Howe became convinced that if " the Militia of Westchester-county "could not be depended on," in the revolutionary interest, it was equally untrustworthy, in the interest of the King; that the farmers of Westchester-county were reliable, mainly, in their love of their respective homes; that they desired nothing more than a peace- ful occupation of their respective fiirms; and that he need not expect any military co-operation from them. He learned the lesson, faithfully ; and no one who reads what he subsequently wrote,^ no one who studies 1 General Washingtvn to John Augustine Washington, "N"!W-YoRK, 22 "July, 1776." 2 Ibid. 3 In his piiblislied Despatclies to tlie Home Government, while he held the chief commund of the .\i my in .\nierica, and in his Xurnilive in a Committee of tke House of Commons, relative to his Conduct, etc., es- pecially in bis Obsenitlioiis upon a pam]ih!et entUled Lettei'S to a Noble- man, Oeneral Howe told the story of his great exi)ection of active co- operation, ill Ihejifld, from those who favored the Koyal ca\ise ; of the what he subsequently did, concerning the alleged loy- al element of the country, will fail to trace the spirit of both his words and his actions, back to the teach- ings of that not unprofitable expedition of the Plucnix and the Hose into the western waters of Westchester- county. Whatever may have been the real purposes of the expedition, the eastern shore of the river was so well guarded that no attempt was made to land, in force, for any purpose, on the Westchester-county side of it, nor was there any open communication between the ships and the inhabitants of that County, although it is known that frequent communications were effect- ed, secretly and in the night, with some of the in- habitants of the Cortlandt Manor* — it is not pretended by any one, that any Loyalist, from either of the three Counties of Orange, Westchester and Duchess, sought refuge on board of either of the ships. The river assurances, to that effect, which he received from Governor Tryou and othei-s ; of the measures adopted by himself, under the most favorable rircumst«nces ; and of the bitter disappointment which he had experi- enced, in every instance. As the inliabitants of Staten Island, and those of Queens, Westchester, and Duchess-counties were su]iposed to have been especially conserva- tive and, consequently, had been most terribly outraged by the domi- nant faction, it Wiis reasonably supposed, by those who were familiar witli the fai t<<, that retJiliation if not loyalty would induce these, especially, to declare against those who had oppressed and ontraged them ; but the peaceful disposition of the fanners of lower Orange and Duchess and Weslchester-counties, tlieir simple domestic habits and cuutrollingloveof home, and their almost universal contentment with their oKl-time pivs- perity and comfort and happiness, were not taken into consideration ; and, a-s the expeilition of the Pho nix and the Rose ascertjiined and as General Howe subsecpiently learned, these were more powerful than any other consideration— the farmers referred to, jireferred to endure the hardships to which they might be subjected, al home, instead of aban- doning their homes and wives and children, of throwing themselves into what wouliHiave been new and untried associations ami inethodsand ex- jieriences, and of being subjected to other lianlshiiw, in the Held ur in yai-risimx, as severe, if not more severe, as those from which they would have thus escaped. General How e very well said, after experience had taught him the fac t.s, Miu h might be said upon the state of loyalty and the principles "of loyalty, in America. Aime are loyal from principle ; vmiii/ from in- "terest; manii from resentment; manii wish for peace, but are indiffer- " ent which side prevails ; and there are others who wish success to Great " Hritaiu, from a recollectiou of the happiness they enjoyed under her "government." (Olisermli'iiis ttpon a jxtmpMel entitled Letters to a No- blenuiu, 311.) Although there may have been individuals among the farmers of Westchester-county who, under this classification, were "loyal from " principle " or from " interest " or from "resentment," there can be very little doubt that the iniuis of those farmers were loyal, as far aa they were loyal iiiany degree, because of their desire for peace, no matter from whom it might come, and because of their recollectiou of the liap piuess they had enjoyed under the Colonial Government. They practically illustrated the theory of the party of the Opposition to the Home Goverinnent, with whom they hiul been, generally, in har- mony — " Let i s .4I.o.\e." 4 General ]Vashinijlon to John Angusliiie Washimjl^m, " New York, 22 "July, 177fi." There is not known to have been any communication between the Westchester-county bank of the river and the ships, while the latter re- mained on their lower amhorage-ground, except those referred toon page 2118, ante ; but, subseijuehtly, while the ships were ofTtho (^jrtlandt Manor, their boats as we shall see, were very active, duringevery night ; and it is known the ships were visited by some of the neighboring in- habitants. The guards were less vigilant, in the upper part of the County, than they had been, near Tarrytown. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 389 was carefully sounded, as far as the tenders went ; ' the inhabitants, especially those on the western bank of the river, were widely robbed, and, sometimes, their houses were burned ; - and the line of couiniuni- cation, between the City and the upper portions of the country, was effectually cut ; ' but, if the purpose had been merely to cut off' the supplies, since the sup- plies of the City which were taken from Westchester- county, were drawn, during the harvest-season, only in very limited ([uantilies and those from only the near- by farmers, possessing only limited means, the ships were anchored too far up the river; and that par- ticular purpose of the expedition must have been, to some extent, defeated, by the mistake of the officer commanding it. The Militia who were ordered out for the protection of the storehouses and the passes in the Highlands, responded with great promptitude,* so much so, in- deed, that General Washington was warranted in calling to the main Army some Massachusetts troops who had been sent lo that vicinity;" and the vessels dropped down and anchored " a little below Ver- "planck's Point," and ceased to make any attempt to effect a landing, anywhere.* On the twenty-sixth of July, the ships were said to have drop[)ed down the river, still further," probably to the mouth of the Croton-ri ver ; * and it is very evident they fell down to their original station, oft 1 Oeiinral Clinton to General Washiiujtoii, " FoBT Montuoheky, July " 23, 177C." - CuUiikI a. Uawkea Haij l» General Waaliinijtou, " Uaverstraw, July ITVli;" (lenertll (.7iii/<.ii tu (leneral W'asUinijtini, " FoRT MONTiJOM- *' EKV, July 23, 177tj ; " E-ftract front tt UMer dated itt Furt lilonttfonieri/^ July 2;i, 177rt, in Force's Aniericttn Arfhivvn^ V , i., r>40. ^ Jonrnal of the Cuncention, *' Tluirsdiiy uiorniug.July 18, 1770 Gen' eral Waahinfiton to John Awjutitine Wiuihinyt'oi, *' New Youk, 22 July, "177U." * Pierre Van Otrthtndt and Zephaniah Piatt, Jnnr. to the Convention, " Peekskill, July 18, 1776." ' General Washioijton to the Coneentiun, " IlEAU-ijUARTERS, NEW YORK, "July I'J, 1770." ^Pierre Van (.'orlUuuU and Zephaniah Piatt, Junr. to the Conveuti'm, " Pekkskill, July 22, 1770." ' Memoirs uf Major-yeiieral HeMh, 50. "Pierre Van CorlUimlt and Zephaniah Pliitl, Junr. to the Conreution, '■ Ueaimji abtebs, MoiTii OK Croton, .\ugt. 2, 177G.'' On thetweuty-si.vtli of July, Jusliuu, sou of Caleb Ferris — a member of tlie County Couunittee, Juriug 1775-0 — weut uu board tbe Phienii, remaiuingall night ; awX Philip Schuriu:iu — who htul been in Boston, while the K<)yiil .\rn)y had occuitied the Town ; who had been taken pricioner, by the .VuieriCiins; and who hail been releaijed by reason of (»er- tkjnal intlueuce of his friends— Frederic Secore, ''one Bailey,"* and Lewia Purdy, " from C'rotou River," are also known to hare gone to the same ohip, on that day or subsequently. {ExamiiuUionA of Joshua Ferris, Uiiitoricat Manuscripts, etc. : Miscellaneous Papers, xxxv., GO, 85.) * On Sunday night, the twenty-eighth of July, because the New Eng- land troops ^ad gone away, on the preceding day, leaving the river-line unguarded, the boatd from the shii>s went ashore, "atone Bailey's," near the mouth of Crotou-rivor ; " weut back, half a mile ; and drove off " a pair of o.xcn, two cows!, one calf, onti heifer, and eleven sheep : no "doubt had the assistance of some Tories, on shore." {Pierre Van CortUtndt and Zepltaniah PlaU, Junr., to the Convention, *' Head qI'akters, "MoiTU OF Crot>in, .\ugt. 2, 1770.") Was the Bailey, at wh^j^e house the lauding was thus made, the same Bailey who waa seen ou board tbe Phoenix, a few days afterwards ? Tarrytown, during either the second or third of August.^ In the meantime, while the ships were thus alarm- ing nearly every one, by their movements up the river, General Washington, notwithstanding his multitude of other cares, promptly adopted measures for securing the removal of those unwelcome visitors from the waters of the Hudson. Immediately after their successful passage up the river, the General wrote to the Governors of Connecticut and Rhode Is- land, for the use of some of the galleys which those States had built; and, on the twenty-fourth of July, he wrote to the Convention of New York, telling it what he had done ; that he was in expectation, "every ''hour," that three or four of those galleys would reach the City of New York ; that he had one, ali-eady ; that if any measures were being taken for attacking the ships, in which these galleys could be usefully employed, to let him know ; and that, " if not other- " wise materially engaged," he should be glad to co- operate with them, and to furnish any a-ssistance which the galleys could give.'" The reply of "the "Secret Committee" of the Convention, to whom this portion of the General's letter was referred, has not been found ; but the tenor of it may be seen in the fact that two of the galleys went up the river, on the twenty-eighth of July, and three or four more on the first of August; " and that they probably " ran into "shoal water and creeks, whence they could warp out, " at certain times of tide, and annoy the shipping." On the afternoon of the third of August, these galleys — bearing the names, respectively, of Wa)- " and breechings carried away. The Spitfire was " hulled, several times, and received one shot between " wind and water, which, not being quickly discov- " ered, occasioned her making much water. The rest " of the galleys received considerable damage in their " rigging, sails, and oars.' Under these circumstances, " our Commodore, Colonel Tupper, thought it pru- " dent to give the signal for our little fleet to with- " draw, after manfully fighting a much superior force, " for two hours. 1 It will be seen that very little was said, in this Report, of the opera tions of the Connecticut galleys, the Orane and the Whiliug : the follow- ing correspondence will i-eniedy that defect: I. " New-Haven, October 14, 1770. "Sir: " By Captain Tinker am informed of the misfortune and situation of " the row-galleys sent into the Continental service from this State ; anil " as circumstances are altered, respecting them, since my hvst to you, on "the subject of dismissing theircrews and arms, must again request your "attention to that matter, that the crew of the Cnine, Captain Tinker, "who escaped, may be dismissed, and be admitted to return to the eni- " ployment of this State ; and that if the i rews of the other two galleys "can be of no further service to you, they, likewise, may be dismissed ; " of one or both, as you see tit, as we can employ them to advantiige on "board uin- armed vessels, fitting out, into which service they are desir- "oi.s of entering. " The galleys lieing employed in the service of the Continent, are es- "teemed to be at the Coutinuntiil care and risk. "This State readily submits to your Excellency's directions what is requisite and proper relative to the men and their arms. " I am, with esteem and respect, "Sir, your most obedient, humble servant, " ,IONTH. TkUMIIUI.I,. "To His ExcELLENcv Genkuai, Washinuton." II. " IlEAn cji'AKTERS.OctoberlS, 1776. "Sir: " The very critical state of our Army and frequent movements of the en- " emy render it almost impossible for the Geiieial to write, himself, with- " out neglecting more important duties. He, therefore, directs iiie toan- " swer your letter of the 14th, and to say that the Captains of the galleys "from your State have misbehaved, in variably, from the first moment they " came, to the time of their departure from hence, about a week ago ; " that the accumulation of business and a hope that they would retrieve "their reputation, prevented your having an earlier information of their "behaviour. They are now under the sentence of a Court Martial for " misbehaviour, in the fiiiit attack made on the ships in the North River ; "and on every other occasion, since, have manifested such want of " spirit and judgment as to be despised by the whole Army. . . . " 1 am. Sir, by his Excellency's command, "Your most obedient, bumble servant, "Joseph Heed, Adjulanl-gttieral.'^ " Never did men behave with more firm, deter- " mined spirits, than our little crews; one of our tars, "being mortally wounded, cried to his mess-mate, 'I " 'am a dying man : revenge my blood, my boys, and " 'carry me alongside my gun, that I may die there.' " We were so preserved by a gracious Providence, " that in all our galleys, which consisted of six, we " we had but two men killed and fourteen wounded, "two of which are thought dangerous. We hope to " have another touch at these Pirates, before they " leave our river, which God prosper. " P. S. The following are the particulars of the "galleys, with their killed and wounded, viz.: the " Washington, Captain Hill, four wounded ; the Whit- " ing, McCleave, one killed, four wounded; the Spit- " fire, Grimes, one killed, three wounded ; the Crane, " Tinker, one wounded ; on board a whaleboat, two " wounded." It appears that one, Anderson, had proposed a scheme to the Continental Congress for destroying the British fleet, then lying in the harbor of New York, with fire-ships ; and he had been ofiiciaily recom- mended to General Washington, by the President of the Congress, with a request that the experiment should be made.' The General had, accordingly, employed Anderson in constructing two fire-vessels; and, on the eiglitli of August, they were sent up the river,* for the purpo.se of destroying a portion, at least, of the squadron which seems to have continued to occupy its anchorage, off Tarrytown, although, by some, it is said to have dropped down the river, to the vicinity of the Lower Yonkers. One of these vessels was commanded by Captain Fosdick, the other by -The Pviinsylrauifi Jounial ; and the Wcehht Adi'ertiaer, No. 1757, PHii.AnEi,i"iiiA, Wednesday, August 7, 1771). For other accounts of this early naval action, see an Extract uf a letter from New Yorh, dated August 4, 1770, in Force's American Ai-chit't-s.Tifth Series, i. 751 ; General Woshimjtim to the President of ( 'ongress, " New-York, 5 "August, 177G The VenmyUania Evening Po«<, Volume II., No. 241, Phil- AUEi.riiiA, Tuesday, August li, 1776; The Coniiecticnt Oazelte and Uni- nrsal liitfllitjenerr. Vol. II., No. 666, New-London, Friday, .August 16, 177U; [Ilall'sJ Uvitonj of the Civil War in America^ i., 186, who said " most of till; galleys were ran on shore, and taken ; " Memoirs of Gen- eral H' uth, .M ; Ramsay's 7/i/, 187, because it is so clearly stated, and because it is the work of an oIK- cer of the Royal .\rniy, and, therefore, is not likely to have been over- stated. ' Gordon's //Wor;/ of the American Recolntion, ii.,30.'). * Memoirs of General Heath, 54. " said that one of the tenders was deserted by her " crew, for a time ;" that the tender which was grappled by Captain Thomas was burned to the water's edge and was towed to the shore, by the Americans," by whom one iron six-pound gun, two three-pounders, one two-pounder, ten swivels, a caboose and apron, some gun-barrels, cutla.>-ses, grapplings, chains, etc., were taken from the wreck ; and that the gallant crews of the fireships sustained neither loss nor injury, exee|)t in the instance of one man, who, in setting fire to his vessel, was considerably burned in his face, hands, etc., and in that of Captain Thomas, who, it was feared, perished in the attempt to fasten his vessel to the tender which it destroyed or in making his escape, by swimming, as he was not sub- seiiuently heard of. As (Jeneral Washington stated in the letter from which we derive the information, when writing of him, " his bravery entitled him to a " better fate." " Notwithstanding the bravery and skill of those who conducted the firevessels and the considerable success which attended their efforts, it is said that the advan- tages gained would have been largely increased had THK AMERICAN FIRESHIPS. the galleys more actively co-operated with them ; and there was evidently some dissatisfaction displayed, because of that nautical backwardness ; '■* but these T Lieutenant Loudon, of I'olonel Nicoll's Regiment, and two privates of hisCompany, (General Heathto General Washingtmi, "Kinu's Bridi;e, "August 20, 1776.") 1^ General }ya8hington to Governor TnimhuU, "New-York, .Xugust 18, " 177f>." » Ibid. General Heath reported to General Washington, on the morning after the attack, that the galleys Dull/ iVanhintjton and Lnhpendeaee had be- haved well, in their co-operation with the firevess<-ls, while the other galleys were inactive ; and the Coniinander-in-chief answered, on the same day, expressing his pleiusure in hearing of the good behavior of those w ho had participated in the adventure, and instructing General Heath to " inquire into the cause of the inactivity of the other galleys, "and inform him thereof." — {Richard Carey, Jun. A.D.C.to General Heath, " HF.AD-qrARTER.'!, August 17, 1776.") In Adjutant-general's Reed's reply to Governor Trumbull's letter con- cerning the Connecticut galleys, after having recited the notorious mis- 392 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. repeated attacks aud the want of intercourse with the fleet abd the perils to which they were exposed, prompted tlie commanders of the ships, on tlie eigh- teenth of jVugiist, less than forty-eight hours after the last attack had been made on them, to take advantage of a strong easterly wind and a very rainy morning, to run down the river, past the fortifications thrown up by the Americans, and to join the main body of the fleet, off Staten Island, a feat which was success- fully accomplished, without any considerable dam- age, " the air resounding with acclamations from the " fleet, re-echoed by the Army encamped on the "heights above,'" as they came to the anchorage. During the period occupied in this early naval de- bebavior of the crewB uf all of them, " in the lirst attack made on the "ships in the North River,'' for which they hail heen tried and con- demned by a Continental Court-martial, that olhccr, writing "by bis Ex- " cellency's commands." (rith- jmijf :i'J)i, «/i(^ )saidof the subsequent opera- tion of those galleys, " In the late atfair. Captain McC'leave must be ex " cepted from the general censure, as he managed with if liile '!] "when the ships could move, left his vessel, "th(»ugh stationed as a guard, to go up to King's Bridge, aftereome "clothes, as he pretends. The consequence wa*", that, in the hurry and " confusion, and long before thny were in ilanger, they left the gal- '* ley agro\ind, though they might have burned or bilged her. The enemy " took pos.sessiou of her, in half an liour ; and she, with the other, left " untlei- the like circumstances, will probably j)rove the most formidable " force they can have, to oppose us, on the river. There was a jilace of "safety provided for the other galleys, which they might have got into, "as well as McCleave ; but tliey passeil it, in their hurry." ((Icneial Wttithtitgfon^ Ihrmujh tho AdjiU^tut-f/eiieral, to (ioi-enior T7-»mbiitI^ ' Heao- "Ql'ARTEKS, October 11^, 1776.") 1 [Hall's] //i.i? ; TJv Conneetient Gazelle and Vnieersal Int/ UitjenccT, Vol.11., No. 667, New London, Friday, August 2'J, 1776 ; Memoirs of General Heath, Wi-bi) ; Gordon's History of the American lierolntion, ii., 305; Force's A7nerican Archiees,\., i., !l8:i ; Irvirig's Life nf George Washiiigtvn, ii., 306. 307 ; etc. \\'hat purports to have been copied from a coiitemporury drawing of the brilliant scene, made by Sir .lames Wallace, who bad command of the Hose, on the occasion now under notice, may be seen in 7'//e Maniutl of the Corporation if the City of Sew Yorh for 1864, opposite page 672. It is underetooil to have been copied from the original drawing, in the British Museum ; and it has been re-prodnced, in perfect facsimile, but reduced in size, for the illustration of this article. i^Videpage 31)1, ante.) What the local historian of Westchester-county possibly intended for a description of this daring attempt to destroy the ships, was in these words, taken from his description of the property of the late Elijah Ilich, near Y'onkein: "Here, in 1777, a memorable engagement took " place between the two British frig.ates, the /losc aud the I'ha'nix, which " lay off at anchor, and the gun-boats of the jiatriots which sallied out "of the harbor of Yonkers, having in tow a large tender filled with "combustibles, intending to run it alongside of the frigates. Th(i crews, " however, kept it off, by means of spars ; and a heavy fire of grape and "cannister compelled the gun-boats and their brave crews to seek shelter " in the mouth of the Saw Mill. The year previous," he continued, " General Heath had been requested by the person in command of the " fireships, to be a spectator of the burning of these vessels," quoting. monstration, so interesting to those of Westchester- county who lived near the line of the Hudson-river, neither of the great opposing powers, in the City of New York and on Long Island, on the one side, and on and around Staten Island, on the other, did any thing else than to strengthen their respective forces and prepare for the rapidly approaching contest. General Washington continued to strengthen his de- fences, both in the City of New York and on Long Island ; but the backwardness of the distant States, in sending reinforcements to the Army, not only caused a constant anxiety, at Head-quarters, but an alarm which extended beyond the lines of the Camp.'-' in full, what General Heath, in his Memoirs, under the date of the six- teenth of August, 1776, hid said of the attempt to destroy these ships, which is the subject of the narrative, in the text. (History of Westehester- eonitty, original edition, ii., 4.59, 460 ; the same, second edition, ii., 627, 628.) As it is more than probable that the ships, when they were attackeeculiar physical ailments of the two brothers, which they shared with the King, very clearly indicated whose offspring they were, although they were born in wedlock and were, therefore, nominally, Howes. They were, in fact, half-brothers of the King. 3 The extent of the authority of the brothers. Admiral and General Howe, as Commissioners for the restoration of Peace, in America, lias been so variously slated, that the careful reader will do well to refer to their Commission, which may be found in a most singular connection with a mass of peen laid before the House of Com- mons, early in 1778. (.Minon's Parliamentary Register, London : 1778, viii., 308-312.) When Lord North, closely pinned in debate, declared that " taxation " was not to be given np : it was to be enforced : but whether at present ' or hereafter was a point of [lolicy which the Commissioners would " learn, on the spot, by s>mnding the people upon the spot," there was jHjlnt as well as wit in what Charles James Fox said, in reply : " Accord- "ing to the noble Lord's explanation. Lord Howe and his brother are " to be sent out as »pi'^, not as Commissioners, and if they cannot get on "shore, they are to toHiuf ujion the coasts." (iMbates in the House of Commons, May 22, 1770 ; .\lmou's Purliametitury Register, iv., 120.) 34 the harbor together, bringing another heavy rein- forcement to the Royal Army, as well as the much needed Camp-equipage; * two days later, [_Atif/usl 14, 1776,] Sir Peter Parker reached Staten Island, with the remains of the expedition which had been sent to Virginia and the Carolinas ; •' and, at the same time, Lord Dunmore, '' with the refugees and blackamoors " from Virginia," * and Lord William Campbell, re- cently Governor of South Carolina, also joined General Howe.' Although General Howe made no mention of them, in his desjiatches to Lord George Germaine, it is said the Royal Army was strength- ened, also, about the same time, by the accession of " several Regiments from Florida and the West Iii- "dies;"" and, although about one half the German troops had not arrived — they were on the ocean, but were not immediately expected — the strength and discipline and appointments and spirits of the Army were greatly superior to those of the American Army, and reasonably promised greater success, in the field. The Convention of the State, during that period of suspense, removed back from the White Plains to Harlem, occupying the old Church-building of the Reformed Dutch Church;' and, nearer to the scene of the expected troubles, it provided for the protec- tion of the Hudson-river and Long Island Sound, where the enemy was expected to make a landing, in force, by ordering the entire Militia of Westchester- county to appear, with five days' provisions, to take possession of such points, on the river and Sound, as General Morris should regard as most exposed to the enemy ; to remain in service during ten days ; to re- ceive Continental pay and subsistence ; and iliat each man who should not have arms should bring with him a shovel, spade, or pickaxe, or a scythe straight- ened and fixed on a pole^" — the latter, not easily to * General Hoice to Lord George Germaine, " Staten Island, 15 Au- "gust, 1776;" Annual Register for 1776: History of Europe,* 169 ; Mem- oirs of General Heath, 53 ; Gordon's Histirry of the American Sevolulion, ii., 304, 305. 5 General Hove to Lord George Germaine, " Staten Island, 15 August, "1776;" Governor Tryon to the same, "Ship Di chess of Gordon, off "ST.iTEN Island, August 14, 1776," postscript, dated "August 15, '' 1776 ; " Gordon's History of the American Revolution, ii., 306 ; etc. 'Jones's History of Sew York during the Revolutionary War, i., 103. ' General Howe lo Lord George Germaine, " Staten Island, I5th "August, 1776." > Annual Register /or 1776 : History of Europe, 169 ; Gordon's History of the American Revolution, ii., 306. 'That old Church-edifice occupied the Church lot, on the South sideot the Great Way, or Church-lane, not far from the Harlem-river. As the Streets and Avenues now run, it was inside of the block bounded by the First and Second-avenues and One hundred and twenty-fourth and One hundred and twenty-fifth-streets, near the present intersection of the First-avenue and One hundred and twenty-fourth-street, as it has been described to us by our friend, James Kiker, Esq., of Waverly, New I Vork, the distinguished historian of Harlem, etc. The fe.itures of the old building may be seen in the View of Harlem I from Morritania, copied from the original drawing, in the British Mu- seum ; and reproduced in the Manual of tJte CorjKiration of the City of I .Yeir Fori /or 18t'a, oppvisite page 010 ; and, again, on page '218 of this work, for the illustration of this article. i 10 JoiinwJ of the Convention, "Die Sabbati, 4 P.M., .Vugt. 10, 1776." 394 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. be done, as any Westchester-county farmer could have told those Deputies by whom this order was made. As we have elsewhere stated/ Kings-county " determined not to oppose the enemy," although the latter had not made any attempt to occupy it ; and the Convention, it will be remembered, made some rash movements toward crowding all who lived within that County into still greater acts of hostility against the Americans, instead of inspiriting them and secur- ing their continued fealty to the State of which they were members. It provided for the removal of all which remained, of those Cannon which had been brought from the City and laid on the roadsides of the County of Westchester — those which had been spiked and unspiked, guarded and left unguarded, at such heavy cost, some months previously — and General Clinton was requested to have carriages made for such of those guns as he should consider necessary for the defenceof the works to the northward of King's Bridge.' At the suggestion of General Washington,* measures because of "suspicions" which somebody had en- tertained concerning them, to the several County Committees, but in a tone of mildness which was re- markably unusual ; ' and, in other ways, endeavoring to serve the cause of the country — one of the most re- markable of the multitude of subjects which, at that time, crowded themselves before the Convention, for its consideration, was a letter from John Sleght, Chairman of the Committee of Kingston, " stating " that the women surround the Committee-chamber, " and say, if they cannot have Tea, their husbands " and sons shall fight no more."" At length, every preparation for service in the field having been made, on Thursday, the twenty-second of August, the Campaign was opened. Had Lord Howe been despatched, with the heavy reinforcements which he brought, directly to New York instead of to Halifax — and, since it was known, in England, that New York would be the base of all the opera- tions of the Campaign, there was no other reason •• ViKW UF IIAIJLAEM I'ltd.M MOKISANIA IN THE I'KoNIMI. <>! \^<\\W, -l.l' I I.M' , \~,i'h>." [Copied from the original in the British Museum for George H. Moore by Richard Sims ] were taken for the removal of the women, children, and infirm persons, in the City of New York, to places of greater safety ; ^ for obstructing the naviga- tion, in both the Hudson and the East-rivers, as well as in Buttermilk-channel, the latter separating Gov- ernor's-island from Long Island ; * providing for the temporary support of those who should be driven from their homes, by the enemy ; ' transferring the disposition of those whom it had cast into prison, iVide page 379, ante. 2 Vide pages 322-324, ante. 3 Journal of thf Convention, " Die Veneris, 9 ho., A.M. , August 16, 1776." General Washiiiglon to the Convention, " Head-qi'ARTERS, New-Yohk, "Aug. 17, 1776." ^Journal of the Convention, "Die Sabbati, 9 ho., A.M., Augt. 17, " 1776 ;" the same, "Die Veneris, 3 ho., P.M., Augt. 23, 1776;" Ihe same, " Monday morning, Augt. 26, 177G ; " etc. « Journal of the Convention," Die Veneris, 9 ho., A.M.,. August 16, 1776 ;" the mmf, "Die Sabbati, 9 ho., A.M., Augt. 17, 1776 ; " Journal of the Committee of Safety, "Die Luna>, 9 ho., A.M., Augt. 19, 1776;" Journal of the Convention, " Die Sabbati, 4 ho., P.M., Augt. 24, 1776 ; " etc. T Journal of the Convention, "Die Solis, 8 ho., A.M., Augt. 25,1776." than the bad judgment of those, in England, who controlled the movements of the troops, that he was not thus sent — the Campaign could have been opened several weeks earlier, when General Washington was much less prepared to receive an enemy, and, therefore, when a complete success in the suppression of the Re- bellion was very much more promising; but that Al- mighty power which controlled all things, had other purposes ; and the cause of America was promoted by that remarkable blunder among those who opposed it. On the morning of Thursday, the twenty-second of August, as we have said, the active operations of the > Journal of the Convention, "Monday morning, Augt. 26, 1776." ''Journal of the Convention, "Monday morning, .\ugt. 26, 1776." It may be proper for us to say that the Chairman's letter was re- ferred to the Deputation from Ulster county ; and that, a few weeks subsequently, tired of waiting for the Tea, " mobs, from different parts "of the country," went to Kingston; broke open the buililings which contained it ; and, undoubtedly, helped themselves and their mothers and sisters and wives and daughters to what was then officially called " that detestable article called Tea." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 395 Royal Army were commenced by the movement of the Britislx Grenadiers and Light Infantry and tiie Hessians, or ratlier the German, Grenadiers, Liglit Infantry, and Chasseurs — tiie last-named commanded by the Count Donop — the whole numbering " not less "than four thousand men," ' of the I'lite of the Army, the whole commanded by General Sir Henry Clin- ton, to Graveseud Bay, near Coney-island, where, under the fire of three frigates and two bombketches,' the naval portion of the movement liaving been com- manded by Commodore Hotham, the entire detach- ment, with forty pieces of artillery, were landed, in two hours and a half, without meeting the slightest opposition from the Americans. This Division of the Royal Army having met with no resistance, the re- mainder of the Army and of the arliiiery — except two Brigades of Germans, under General de Heister, and another Brigade of Germans, a detachment of the Fourteenth Infantry, from Virginia, some convales- cents and some recruits, all of them commanded by Lieutenant-colonel Dahymple, which were left for the protection of Staten Island— were also landed on Long Island, during the morning.'' The purposes of this work do not require us to fol- low the immediately subsequent operations of the two Armies ; and the general knowledge which prevails concerning the disastrous Battle of Long Island," made more disastrous by reason of " the obstinate, "self-conceited, inefficiency," if not by the criminal disobedience and neglect, of General Israel Putnam ; concerning the remarkable retreat of the American Army, from Long Island, made more remarkable and successful through the nautical skill of Colonel John Glover and his Regiment of Marblehead fishermen ; concerning the successful occupation of the City of New York, by the Royal Army, made more suc- cessful by reason of the arrant cowardice of those who had been posted at Kip's-bay, for the pur- j)ose of obstructing any attempt which the enemy should make to effect a lauding at that place, as well as by reason of the greater cowardice of the Brigade of Jlas.sachusetts troops, commanded by General Fellows, and that of the Brigade of Con- necticut troops, commanded by (ieneral Parsons, both of them, eight BegimentS, in all, sent for the support of the small shore-guard ; concerning the successful evacuation of the City of New York, by the American Army, made more successful by the tact and hospitality of Mary Lindley Slurray and by the l[Hall'8l }{i^lorij of the Vu-U War in America, i., 188. See, hIso, Stodnian's Hhitonj of the Amcricun U'ur, i., 193. 2 [Hall's] HUlorij «/ the Civil War in .Imm'cii, i., 188 ; Stediimn's Hit- tory of the Avieriran War, i., 193. ^General //"ire to Lord George Ot-rmaine, "Newtown, LoNfi Ts(.ani>, "3 Sept., 1770 ;" General Wanhinglmito Gnteral Heath, " IlEAD-yi AHTKRs, " New-York, 23 .Vuguat, 177G ; "' the same to the I'rrxid- nt nf the Coiigre»i>, "New-York, .\ngnst 23, 177f>;" [llall'sj lliMoni of the (Hril War in America, i., 188: JItnnoirs of General Urath, .W ; SteilniRn'8 }{}>ttorij of the American War, i., 193 ; Gordon's Hiftori/ of the Amtrican Hevolution, ii., 306 ; etc. soldierly ability and the knowledge of the ground, of Aaron Burr; concerning the brilliant skirmish on Harlem Heights, made more brilliant by the daring bravery of IMajor Leitch, of Virginia, and that of Col- onel Thomas Knolton, of Connecticut ; and concerning the apparent inactivity, in both the Armies, which prevailed, during several succeeding weeks, — the gen- eral knowledge which prevails, concerning all these subjects, renders anything else than a mere reference to them, unnecessary. But, nevertheless, there were some minor operations, of both parties, during that period, which may well receive passing notices. Early on the morning of the twenty-seventh of August, two ships and a brig anchored a little above Throgg's-neck ; and before the troops whom General Heath had sent for the purposes of protecting the neighboring property, could reach the shore, several barges had gone ashore, on City-island ; killed several cattle ; * and carried away the dead animals and one of the inhabitants. The troops managed to secure the remainder of the cattle which were on the island.* As there was an evident intention, on the part of the enemy, to occupy one or more positions, on New York-island or within Westchester-county or both, General Heath, who commanded all the Continental troops at Kingsbridge and in the last-mentioned County, with that faithful attention to his duties which so generally characterized him, ordered a chain of vedettes and other sentries to be maintained at Morrisania, Hunt's-point, Throgg's-neck, and other points, on the Sound, in order that the movements of the enemy, had he inclined to move to those neigh- borhoods, or to either of them, might be promptly made known to him.'' The usefulness of that wise precaution will be seen, hereafter. For the purpose of cutting the line of communica- tion of the City of New York, through the Sound, with the sea — the way to the ocean, by way of the Narrows, having been already occupied by him — the enemy very judiciously occupied Barren-island, be- longing to Westchester-county, Montresor's — now Randall's — island, and what is now known as Ward's-island — the latter two belonging to the County of New York, all of which, to some ex- tent, at lea.st, commanded the passage to and through the Sound ; ' and, on the tenth and eleventh of September, a considerable body of troops was landed on Montresor's-island,* which entirely com- < Colonel .(osepli Drake, in his letter to the Convention, dat«d "New- "RocHELL, .\ugt. '28, 177li," said " they have not been able to plnndtr " much; they got from Mineford's-islaud " [ii«i<; Cilii-islaml,] "4 horned " cattle and some ponltrv, whirli is all wc have been able to learn they ' have plundered." In Ills Memairs, (lage'iG,) General Heath said "the "enemy carried off one man and 14 cattle." ^ Memairn nf fli-neral Heath, 55, 56; Colonel Ji>sej>h Drake to General Morris, "New Kochei., Augt. 27, 1770" — Hiflorical Manuscripts, etc.: Miaeellanet'us Papers, xxxvi., :139. o Memoim of General H, alh, 59. ■ Stednian's History of the American War, i., 199. ^Memoirs of General Heath, 59. 396 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. manded the Manor-house^ — all there was, at that time, of Morrisania, except the small farmhouses of the manorial tenantry, which were scattered over the surrounding country. The channel which separated Morrisania, in Westchester-county, from Montresor's- island, in the City of New York, being quite narrow, and a heavy picket of four hundred and fifty mounted men having been constantly maintained at Morrisania, the sentries of the respective forces, posted within half- gunshot distance, sometimes fired at each other, in violation of the inconsistent usages of War; and General Heath has recorded some interesting instances of both the friendly and the unfriendly correspond- ence of these very important minor outposts.'' But a cou2Jle deserters from a man-of-war which was an- chored off the island, conveyed such information to General Heath as led him to sujjpose that the entire force which occupied that island could be easily cap- tured ; and, having submitted the subject to the con- sideration of the General Officers of his Division and to General Washington, and, having received the ap- proval of all, he proceeded to make the attempt. Two hundred and forty men were detached for that purpose ; and the command of the expedition was given to Lieutenant-colonel Michael Jackson and Major Logan and Major Hatfield, the latter of West- chester-county. They were to embark, at the new Bridge over the Harlem-river, on board of three large floats ; to be covered by a fourth float, similar to the others and carrying a detachment of Artillery, with a light three-pounder gun; to fall down the Harlem-river, with the ebb, during the night, to Morrisania ; and the calculation was so made that, at daybreak, the young flood should be so much made, at the island, as to cover the flats, at the proj)osed place of landing, sufficiently for the floats to leave Morrisania, and be run ashore. The various sentries, on the line of the Harlem-river, were said to have been informed of the character of the movement, and instructed to permit the exjiedition to pass down the river, without challenging it ; and every promise of a successful result was heard from all who were to be concerned in it or who knew of the proposed plan of operations. Notwithstanding one of the sentries had not been told of the expedition or had misunderstood the Order which had been given to him, and had resolutely disregarded the entreaties for silence which had been made, and had discharged his musket, giving an alarm, the enemy does not appear to have been disturbed ; and the three floats ran up to the place appointed for the landing, without serious op- position, and at the appointed time. But, there, a new and entirely unlooked-for obstruction was encoun- tered. The orders were that the float which contaiiied the three commanding Officers should run ashore, between the other two ; that the two Majors should jump ashore, one to the right and the other to the left, 1 Memoirs of Oe)ieral Heath, G2, 63. and take command of the men who were on those two outside floats, respectively, while Lieutenant-colonel Jackson should retain the command of those who were on the central float ; and that the three parties should act in concert. The Officers and those who were on the central float sprang ashore, as they were expected ; received and repulsed a charge which the enemy's guard made on them; but failed to receive the slightest support from those who were on the other two floats, who, instead of landing, sullenly " lay upon their oars." The enemy seeing that dis- affection, rallied, and returned to the charge, with great spirit; and the Americans, those from the cen- tral float, finding themselves deserted, returned to their own float, with heavy loss; and the entire ex- pedition withdrew from the island — whether the fourth float, on which were the Artillery and which was intended as a covering party, performed any ser- vice, is not now known, as nothing whatever has been said of it, in the narrative of the encounter and retreat. It is said that Lieutenant-colonel Jackson received a musket-ball in his leg; that Major Thomas Henley, one of the Aides-de-camp of General Heath, who had insisted on going out with the expedition, as a Volunteer, was shot through his heart, as he was getting into the float; that Major Hatfield was missing ; and that the Americans lost, in killed, wounded, and missing, fourteen men.'^ There was a wide-spread sorrow expressed for the death of Major Henley, who appears to have been a general favorite ; and the cowardice of those who held back their support was as widely reprobated ; but, in the prevailing temper of that period, although the delinquents were arrested and tried by Court- martial, nothing appears to have been done with them, beyond the cashiering of one of the Captains.^ 2 The most complete account of tliis disastrous expedition is that of General Heath, in his Memoirs, G3-6(i ; but the Orders which were given to Lieutenant-colonel Jackson by General Heath, "King's BiiiD(iE, "September 22, 177C ; " David How's Dianj, Edit. Morrisania, 1865, September 22, 1776 ; General Orders, " Head-quakters, Harlem- "liEKJHTS, September 24,1776;" Lieutenant-colouel Tench Tilyhman to \yillinm Duer, " Head-quarters, Haklem-heights, September 25, 1776 ; ' Extract of a letter from on Officer, at Harlem, dated September 25, 1776, in Force's American Archives, Fifth Series, ii., 524 ; Extract from a letter from Mount Washinylvn, datiiji .'>eptember 26, 1776 ; John Adams to Mrs. Adams, " Pmii.adei.piiia, October 8, 1776 ; " Gordon's History of the American llevolntion, ii., 336— who says there were Jive boats, one of which was sunk by the fire of the P/nme, frigate— etc., may be usefully consulted concerning it. 3 General Orders, Head-qvarters, Harlem-heioiits, September 29, 1776 ■ Proceedings of a Getwral Court-martial of the Line, held on the Heights of Harlem, by order of His Excellency George Washington, Esq., General and Commander-in chief of the Forces of the United States of America, for the trial of the CajHains Wisnrr and Scott, in the service of said States, September 30, 1776 ; AdjnUmt-geneial heed tv General Beall, " Heai>-qi arters, Oct. 5, 1776 ; " the members of the General Court- martial to Adjtttaiit-yeneral liecd, " Camp near Head-qvarters, October " 6,1776;" Memoirs of General Heath, 66. The atrocities of both Ofticsrs and Privates of the American Army and the inadequacy of the punishments, therefor, to which the delinquents were then subjected, may be seen in multitudes of instances, throughout the contemporary publications; but the letter of General Washington, written to the President of the Continental Congress, " Heiuhts or THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 397 The apparent inactivity of the two opposing Ar- mies, during several weeks after the occupation of the City of New York, was not understood, even by the Congress, and created some uneasiness;' but both were actively employed, the Royal Army in throwing up a line of defences, on the high grounds overlook- ing the Harlem-plains, from the South, in order to protect the City from an attack from the landside, when the main Army should be put in motion, for other operations;- and the American Army in not only throwing up defences on the high grounds over- looking the Harlem-plains, from the North, in order to protect itself from any attack which might be made on it, in that remarkably strong position,' but in throwing up defensive works, in its rear and at distant points, in order to guard against any surprise, by the enemy, of either of those points.* During that long interval of apparent inactivity in the two Armies, the Convention of New York and its Committee of Safety were not idle nor inattentive to the interests of the country. It provided for the re- moval of the women, children, and infirm, and that of the poor, from the City of New York, in some in- stances into Westchester-county ; ^ aud the care of the public records also received its careful attention.* When the enemy's shipping threatened the shores of Suffolk, it appealed for help from Connecticut, in view of its own inability to afford protection ; ' when the Army retreated from Long Island, wisely foresee- ing that the Horses, Cattle, Hogs, and Sheep, within the County of New York and the lower portions of Westchester-county, would become exposed to the depredations of the enemy, the Committee of Safety ordered them to be, forthwith, driven into the interior parts of the State, and requested General Washing- ton to make that order public, and to give all possible assistance in carrying it iuto execution ; * and, subse- "Haerlem, 24 September, 1776," may be referred to, as a specimen of all of them. ' The correapondence of John .\dams with his wife, which has been published, will show the anxious uncertainty which prevailed in the Congress. 2 [Hall's] History of the Cii il Wur in America, i., 201 ; Stedman's His- tory of the American Wtir, i., 210. ' General lloxce to Lord George Germaine, " New-Yoiik Isuxd, 2.') Sept., " 1776 ; " Anuutil Hegister for 177 6 : Hittory of Europe, *176 ; [Hall's] His- tory of the Civil ir.ir in America, i., 201 ; Stedman's Hittory of the Ameri- can War, i., 209, 210 ; etc. Memoirg of General Heath, 67, 68. i Journal of the Committee of Safely, " Txiesdny afternoon, Augt. 27, " 1776 ; " the sam; " FiSHKir.L, in Di T( HE.Jouriial of the Convention, "Thursday morning, Augt. 29, 1776." followed, holding sessions, while on it way, at King's Bridge,' at the house of Mr. Odell on Philipse's Manor,** at the house of John Blagge, at Croton- river f and, possibly, elsewhere.'" It constructed fire- ships, for the protection of the Hudson-river from the enemy's vessels and it continued the support of the State's cruisers, on the ocean.'- It attended to the removal of the military stores which were endangered by the movements of the enemy ; " it ordered all the bells to be taken from the Churches" and all the brass knockers from the doors of houses,'* " in order that the " fortune of War may not throw the same into the " hands of our enemy and deprive this State, at this "critical period, of that necessary, though unfortu- " iiate, resource for supplying our want of cannon ; " it provided Lances for those of the Militia whom it was unable to provide with other arms ; and when General Washington's supply of Gunpowder had be- come unsafely small, it replenished it from its own resources." It appointed, on the motion of John Jay, a special " Committee of Safety and Correspondence " for that part of this State which lies below the " Highlands," Colonel Henry Remsen, Major Garret Abeel, and Major Peter Pra Van Zandt, all of them of the City of New York, having been appointed as that Committee but, notwithstanding James Duane and John Jay and William Duer were also appointed " to draw up Instructions " for that Committee, and notwithstanding the stirring events of which that portion of the State, " below the Highlands," very soon became the scene, nothing more was heard of either the Instructions or the Committee of Safety which was thus erected. It strengthened the works which had been thrown up for the defense of the Highlands ; and it added to those defences some " works on the East side of the river, about three " miles below Fort Montgomery, at a place called " Red Hook, near Peekskill, which are well-calcu- ' Journal of the Commiltee of Safety, " KlNu'8 BRinoE, Augt. 30, 1776." ^Journal of t)ie Committee of Safety, "At the iiovse OF Mk. Ol)Ei,L, " PiiiLii'SE'.s Manok, Augt. 31, 1770," ^Jouriiiil of Ihi! Committee of Safety, " CuoTON-niVER, AT the house of ".Tno. BLAniiK, Augt. 31, 1776." 1" There is no record of the doings of the Committee, on Sunday, the first of September, although it evidently continued its journey, from the Croton-river to Fishkill, on that day. "Journal of the Cotireiitiou, "Tluii-sday morning, Augt. 29, 1776 ;" the .wrac, "Die Sabbati, 9 ho., A.M., Sept. 21, IT'S General Washiui/tou to the Convention, " HEAn-giHETERS, Heights of Harlem, Sept. 20, " 1T76 ; " etc. ^'^Jouriud of the Committee of Seri- "ence, is to be formed with some apprehension that all our troops "will not do their duty." .After the experience of the Geueral had been made more complete, by the cowardice of the troops at Kip's- b»y, he thus wrote, also to the Congress, " We are now encamped, with "the main body of the Army, on the Heights of Haeiiem, where I should "hope the enemy would meet with a defeat, in case of an attack, if the " generality of our troops wxnild btdiave with tolerable bravery. But " e.\perience, to my extreme allliction, has convinceil me that this is "rather to be wished for than expected. However, I trust that there "are many who will act like men, and show themselves worthy of the "blessings of freedom." {Letter to tlie Congress, " Hii.vl>-qu.\RTKiis, .\T "Colonel Morkis's iiovse, 16 September, 1776.") On the day after the date of the Retitnis of Ihe Ai nnj whicli are referred to in the text, the (ieueral wrote to his brother, "the de|>cndence which the Congress have "placed iipim the Militia has already greatly injured and, I fear, will " totally ruin our cause. Being subject to no control, themselves, they "introduce disorder among the tr(»ups whom we have attempted to dis- "cipline ; while the change in their living brings on sickness; and this "causes an impatience to get home, which spreads, universally, and in- "troduces abominable desertions. In short, it is not in the power of " words to describe the task I have to perform. Kifly thousand pounds " would not induce me again to undergo what I have done." (General WushingloH to John Angnttine Washington, "UkiuiITS OF HAERI.EM, 22 "September, 1776.") 400 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY present and fit for duty, including Colonel Knox's Regiment of Artillery, was reduced to fifteen thou- sand, one hundred, and four;' and on the fifth of October, the same rank and file, present and fit for duty, including the Artillery, numbered only fourteen thousand, four hundred, and eighty-six, exclusive of seven skeleton Regiments of Connecticut and Rhode Island, forming two nominal Brigades, each with its full complements of Officers and Stafl', in which there were nominally twelve hundred and seventy-five men, present and fit for duty. There was, also, a body of Massachusetts Militia, " computed at four thousand, " so scattered and ignorant of the forms of Returns "that none can be got;" and a Regiment of New Hampshire Militia was posted at the White Plains and another at the Fishkills, " under the like circum- " stances." ^ While the American Army was thus made weaker, day by day, by the disaffection or the despair of the sickly, despondent, home-sick, and ill-provided-for men who composed it — men who, iu multitudes of instances, had enlisted either from necessity, occas- ioned by the prevailing prostration of every kind of business, or because they had been enforced to do so, by drafts, or because it had afforded oppor- tunities for speculation and plunder, without, in either class, the slightest pretence to a care for " the " cause of America " or to even a love of country — the Royal Army, well-appointed and well -officered, numbered upwards of thirty thousand effective men, exclusive of those who were left for the protection of Staten Island and of those who were sick.' Indeed, 1 Selum of Brigiidet under the immediate command of Hi» ExcelU ncy George WanhiiujUm, " Uaui.km Heights, Head-quabtees, September 30, "l"7(i." 2 Wcvklif Return of the Regiments of Horse and Foot, under the immediate comnunid of His Excftleiicij George Washington^ *^ Wx^vz^i Heights, Oc- "tober 5, 1776." General Lincolu's command can scarcely be regardi-ii, with any pro- priety, as a portion of the main Army nor as a part of tlie fighting force of any .\rmy, since it was sent for, to perform police duty, to ijuiet the apprehensions of the Convention of New Yorlv u!i account of tlie disaf" fected, in that Stiite — those whom the Congresses and the (;ommittee8 had forced into disaffection, by the outrages wliich had been inflicted on them, in the vain attempt to secure an entire conformity of political opinions with the official opinions of the dominant faction. 3 General Howe's Returns show thiit, when he occupied Staten Island, after the arrival of the reinforcements brought by Lord Howe, say on the iiinth of .\ugu8t, his command numbered, including his Officers, twenty- nine thousand, three hundred, and eight, of whom twenty four thousand, two hundred, and twenty-seven were rank and file, fit for duty. (Reply to the Observations of Lieut. Gen. Sir William Howe, on a pamphlet, en- titled Letters to a Nobleman, Second Edition, 37.) Three days after the date of that Return, [August 12,] the two fleets, convoyed, respectively, by Commodore Hotham and the Repulse, came into the harbor of New York, with the Guards and the Fii"st Division of the Hessians, {Compare Lord George Germaine's despateh to General Howe, dated, " Whitehall, 21 "June, 1776," wit/i General Howe's d&tpaieh to Lord George Germaine, dated " Staten-Isl.vnd, 15 August, 177C ; ") and, two days subsequently, [j4ti3HS( 14,] Sir Peter Parker and Lord Dunniore also arrived, {General Howe to Lord George Gerrniiine, " Sr.\TEX-IsLAND, 1.5 August, 177C,") the former, with what remained of the forces which had been sent to Vir- ginia and the Carolinas, " as well as with some Regiments from Florida "and the West Indies," (^Hnwfi Register for 1776: History of Europe, *169,) numbering, "at least,five thousandmen," (Jones's Historf/ of New in the graphic language of one of the most able writ- ers of that period, at the time now under considera- tion an intimate friend of the master-spirits of the Convention of New York, " The British Army was "commanded by able and experienced Officers; the " rebel by men destitute of military skill or experience " and, for the most part, taken from mechanic arts or " the plough. The first were possessed of the best " appointments, and of more than they gould use ; "and the other of the worst, and of less than they " wanted. The one were attended by the ablest Sur- "geons and Physicians, healthy, and high-spirited; " the other were neglected in their health, clothing, " and pay, were sickly, and constantly murmuring "and dissatisfied. And the one were veteran troops, " carrying victory and conquest wheresoever they were " led ; the other were new-raised and undisciplined, " a panic-struck and defeated enemy, whenever at- " tacked — such is the true comparative diflTerence " between the force sent to suppress, and that which "supported, the Rebellion."* York during the Revolutionary War, i., 110 :) Ihe latter, " with the refu- " gees and blackamores from Virginia," {the same, i., 103,) "about a "thousand more " {the tame, i., 110.) The Second Division of the Hes- sians, theSi.Yteenth Kegiment of Light Dragoons, the horses for remount- ing the Seventeenth Regiment of Dragoons, the diaught-horses for the Artillery and baggage, four hundred and two German and not far from five hundred British recruits, and the Prince of Waldeck's Regiment of German troops, all of whom joined General Howe, while he was in Westchester-county, as we shall see, hereafter — were on their way to America, at the time of which we write. {Lord George Germaine to Gen- eral Howe, " Whitehall, 21 June, 1776.") There were, also, some Pro- vincial "Corps, already raised," of whom we have seen no Returns, {Genend Howe to Lord George Germaine, " Statex-Island, 1G .\ugn6t, " 1776, ") probably not strong in numbers, but, nevertheless, entitled to notice, in this connection. From these facts, it appears that the entire force, present and com- manded by General Howe, before he opened the Campaign on Long Is- land, was upwards of forty thousand men, exclusive of the Marines on the several Fleets, which could have been called ashore, had there been any necessity for their services. Only one Brigade of Hessians, a detach- ment of the Fourteenth Regiment, some convalescents, and those re- cruits which had already arrived, were left on Staten Island ; and the Sick-list was very small ; there were no detiichiuents on special duties ; and there could have been none absent on furlough : it is very clear, therefore, that when the Royal Army was moved from Staten Island, it numbered very little, if any, less than thirty-eight thousand effective men, including its Otticcrs. In the liattle of Long Island, it was said to have lost only three hundred and sixty-seven of all classes, {General Howe to Lord George Germaine, "Newtown, Long Island, 3 Sept., 1776 ;") only "about " ninety-two were said to have been killed or wounded at Harlem. {General Howe to Lord George Germaine, " Head-quarteiis, " York Island, 21 September, 1776 ; ") the occupation of Powle's-hook, Long Island, and the City of New Y'ork required detachments, of course; but there can be little doubt that the Army which General Howe mo\ed fromThrogg's-neck numbered very little, if any, less than thirty thous- and, Officers and men, fit for active service. In confirmation of this estimate of the strength of General Howe's command, in Westchester-county, we may be permitted to state that, after the arrival of the Second Division of the Hessians and of those other reinforcement* to which Lord George Germaine made reference, already noticed, but with the losses which it had sustained in Westches- ter-county and at Fort Washington deducted, on the twenty-second of November, 1776, "the force under General Howe's immediate command," is said to have been thirty-one thousand, seven hundred, and fifty-five. Officers and men, fit for active service. {Keply to the Observations of Lieut. Gen. Sir William Howe, on a pamphlet entitled Letters to a Jfo- hleman, 37.) < [Joseph Galloway's] Letters to a Nohleman, 34, 35. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 401 As we have said, the two Armies were occupied, during several weeks after the Royal Army had taken the City of Now York, in throwing up defensive i works — the American Army, on the Heights of Har- lem, to the northward and eastward of the present village of Manhattanville, back, to Kingsbridge, and in the more exposed portions of Westchester-county : the Royal Army, on the Heights of Harlem and on I A''andewater's Heights, southward from the village of j Manhattanville, and thence to McGowan's-pass. where the postroad to the northward and eastward descended from the high grounds, forming the northernmost portion of the present great City's Central Park, to the Harlem-plains, below ' — and some time was, also, necessarily employed by General Howe, in obtaining information concerning the face of the country, in the rear of the positions occupied by the American Army, "upon a supposition that the enemy" [_fhe American Armyl " should remove from King's- •' Bridge," which information, thus sought in ad- vance of any movement of the Army, was become more necessary since he had found the Americans not so well-disposed to join and to serve the Royal Army, in the field, as he had been taught to expect ; and because the country referred to, the County of Westchester, " was so covered with wood, swamps, "and creeks, that it was not open, in the least de- " gree, to be known, but from post to post or from iVide page 307, ante. See, also, General Hotre to Lord George Germaine, "New York "Island, 25 September, 177fi;" the same to the same, "New-Yohk, 30 " November, 177G ; " Speech of Sir IVilliam Howe hefort: a Committee of the House of Cf/mmong, April 29, 1779, — Almon's Parliamentary Register, xii. 323; Testimoutf of the Earl of Com icallis before a Committee of the House of Commons, May!!, 1779. — Almon's Parliamenlarij Kegisln-, xiii., 3; etc. ' Vide page 386, ante. That diKippointnient was expressed to the Hume Gorernment. in the General's despatch of the twenty-fifth of September, 177G, in these wonls : " We must also have recruits from Europe, not finding the Anier- " icjins disposed to serve with arms, notwithstanding the hopes held out "to me, upon my arrival at this post." In his Speech before a Commit- tee of the House of Commons, on the ttcentij-ninlh of April, 1779, the Gen- eral repeated the expression of his disappointment, on that subject, in these emphatic words: "I miutt, here, add, that I found the Americans " not so well-disposed to join us, and to serve, as I had been taught to "expect." The careful student of the history of that period will also bear testimony, in confirnuttion of what General Howe thus wrote and i raid, that the .Vmericans, those who had been persecuted and outraj;ed ' because of "suspicions" that they were " disaflected," notwithstanding the very reasonable reasons which they had for thus transferring their atrength to the Royal Army, generally remaineoUlly and unreservedly doing evil in | order that what he was pleased to regard as good might, therefrom, be | iecnreil; 35 " accounts to be collected from the inhabitants, who "are entirely ignorant of military description.'" In- deed, during that period, because of the character of the country, in its advantages for defensive opera- tions, and because of his great disappointment, in his failure to receive the support, in arms, from those who were disaffected, which he had been led to ex- pect, General Howe, also, became dispirited and dis- heartened, even to the extent of losing confidence in his own abilities and in those of his immense and well-otficered and well-disciplined command to make any further progress, during that Campaign, nor until the arrival of heavy reinforcements, during the ensuing Winter and Spring.* General Howe had 3 General Howe's Speech before a Committee of the House of Commons, April 29, 1779. In his e.xamination before a Committee of the House of Commons, on the sixth of May, 1779, the Earl of Cornwallis testified that " the knowl- "edge of the country of America, for military purposes, was extremely "difficult to be obtained from the inhabitants ;'' that "the country, in " general, is so covered with wood and so favorable to ambuscades that, " certainly, it was very difficult to obtain a knowledge of it by recon- " noitering ; " and that he " never saw a stronger country or one better "calculated for the defensive." In anotlier portion of his testimony, the Karl stated, " I can only say that it is a very strong country, very " rugged, very hilly, and verj- woody ;'' and that, although, "by no means **equally so," his former description was "applicable, in some degree, " to all," General Gray, before the same Committee and on the same day, testified that ''the inhabitantsof the country, in general, were so very much " against us that they deserted the country wherever we came ; and we "could get no intelligence that we could possibly depend on;" that "that part of .\nierica where I have been, is the strongest country I ever " was in. It is every where hilly and covered with wood, intersected by "ravines, creeks, and niarsliy grounds: and every quarter of a mile, is "a post fitted for ambuscades. Little or no knowledge could be obtained " by reconnoitering ; " and " America is, of all countries, the best calcu- " latcd for the defensive : every one hundred yards might bo disputed, "at least that part of it that I have seen." During a visit which he made to us, at our home, near the White Plains, previously to the late Civil War, General .John E. Wool, a vet- eran in the service of the United States, was peculiarly emphatic con- cerning the natural capabilities of Westchester-county, for a defensive warfare. * " Upon the present appearance of things, I look upon the further "progress of this Army, for the Campaign, to be rather precarious, an "attack upon Khode Island excepted, which I would willingly defer, "(or a short time, in case it should be thought advisible to employ our "whole force together. * * * But, in my situation, I presume, I " must not risk, as a check, at this time, would be of infinite detriment " to us. "The enemy is too strongly posted to be attacked, in front ; and in- " numerable difficulties .are in my way of turning him, on either side, "though his .\rmy is much dispirited from the late success of his "Majesty's arms; yet have I not the smallest prospect of finishing the "contest, this Campaign, nor until the Kebels sec preparations, in the "Spring, that may preclude all thoughts of further resistance. To this " etid, I would propose eight or ten liue-of-battJe .^hips, to be with us in " February, with a oumborof jiupernuuu'rary Seamen, for manning boats, " having fully experienced the want of them, in every movenieut we have "made. We must, also, have recruits from Europe, not finding the ".\mericans disposed to serve with arms, notwithstanding the hopes "held out to nie, upon my arrival at this port." — {General Hotre to Lord George Germaine, "New- York Island, 25 September, 177G," received by his lordship, November 2, 177C.) " With regard to the knowledge of the country, so necessary to be ob- "tained previous to the movement from New-York, I beg leave to nien- " tion the difficulties we labored under, in that respect, throughout the " War, The country is so covered with wood, swani|w, and creeks, that " it is not open, in the least degree, to be known \<\\t from p*>st to post or "from accounts to be collected from the inlial'itants, who are entirely "ignorant of military description. These circonl^t.llll.^■- »irf. therefore 402 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. not learned the more modern military theory of " at- "trition," no matter at what cost, nor was he of the same school of politics as that in which Bute and Germaine and Dundas and Wedderburne and Jay and Duane and the Livingstons and the Morrises were preceptors, of high or low degree: on the other hand, he did not expose his command where the object to be attained was inadequate,' nor was he inclined to visit the country, even that portion of it which was antagonistic to the Royal Army, with se- verity.'^ Whatever may have inspired and encouraged him, notwithstanding all Avhichs he had previously said of the "innumerable difficulties in his way, "of turning him," (he enemy,"^ "on either side," and of his own, evidently well-considered, appre- hensions of an unfavorable result, should an at- tempt be made to do so. General Howe determined to endeavor to turn the left flank of the American Army, encamped on the Heights of Harlem and in Westchester-county, with a view of compelling it to abandon its very strong position and, if possible, of bringing it to action. As the defensive works, on the high grounds to the southward of the Harlem plains, with the moderate detachment which he could leave, for the purpose of occupying them and the other por- tions of the City of New York, and with the further protection which was afforded by the Fleet and the increased safety which had been afforded by the cap- ture of the American works at Powle's-hook, appeared to afford all the protection which would be necessary, there seemed to have been little probability that General Washington would make any attempt to re- cover, or even to raid, that (/ity ; and the determination of General Howe was, therefore, a reasonable one, and, with such a force and with such appointments as he, then, controlled, there was a reasonable probability that it would be attended with an entire success. On Sunday, the fifteenth of September, in order to draw the attention of the Americans from the prep- arations which were being made, on Long Island, for " the cause of some unavoidable delay, in our moTements. I raust, here, " add that I found the Americans not so well-disposed to join us, and to "serve, as I had been taught to expect ; that I thought our farther •* progress, for the present, precarious ; and that I saw no prospect of " finishing the War, that Campaign. These sentiments I communicated 'to the Secretary of State, in the letters last mentioned." — (General Howe' 6 Speech before a Committee of the House of Commoiui, April 29, 1779.) 1 " The most essential duty I had to observe was, not wantonly to coin- "mit his Majesty's troops where the object was inadequate. I knew, " well, that any considerable loss sustained by the Army could not, "speedily nor easily, be repaired. I also knew that one great point " towards gaining the confidence of an Army — and a General without it " is upon the most dangerous ground— is never to expose the Troops, " where, as I said before, the object is inadequate." — (General Howe's Speech before a Committee of the House of Commons, April 29, 1779.) 2 "Although some persons condemn nie for having endeavoured to con- "ciliate his Majesty's rebellious subjects, by talking every means to pre- " vent the destruction of the country instead of irritating them by a con- "trary mode of proceeding; yet am I, from many reasons, satisfied, in " my own mind, that I acted, in that particular, for the benefit of the "King's service." — (General Howe's Speech before a CommiUee of tJie Hou»e of Commons, Apvil 29, 1779.) the occupation of the City of New York, by the Royal Army — which was successfully accomplished, later in the day — the Phcenix, of forty-four guns, and com- manded by Captain Hyde Parker, the Eoebuck, of forty-four guns, and commanded by Captain Ham- mond, and the Tartar, of twenty-eight guns, com- manded by Captain Ommany, each with a tender, had been moved up the Hudson-river, as far as Blooming- dale;''' and they had remained at anchor, at that place after the Royal Army had occupied that City, cover- ing the left flank of the lines and very effectually closing the navigation of the lower portion of the river, to the Americans. But, about eight o'clock, on the morning of Wednesday, the ninth of October, they got under way and stood, with an easy southerly breeze, up the river. The Americans, with great labor and outlay of means, had constructed a chevaux- de-frise, for the protection of the navigation, above Fort AVashingtou audit was hoped it would have intercepted the further passage of the ships while the batteries, at Fort AVashington and Fort Lee, and the galleys, which had been stationed behind the chevuux- de -/rise, played on them; but, "to the surprise and " mortification" of General Washington and his com- mand, they passed all the obstructions, "without the " least difficulty, and without receiving any apparent " damage from our forts,* though they kept up a " heavy fire from both sides of the river." * 5(?™era! Wathinglan to the Prendent of Oongreu, " Head-quabtebs, "at Colonel Mohkis's HotJSE, 16 September, 1776;" General Hoice to Lord George Germaine, " Head-qvarteks, New-Yoek, September 21, " 1776 ; " The New-York Gazette and the Weekly Mercury, No. 131)3, New- York, Monday, October 14, 1776. General Heath, {Memoirs, 60,) said these Ships were "sent up the "river, as far as Greenwich," only, on the fourteenth of September. < Doctor Sparks, in his Writings of George Washington, (iv., 30, note,) said " the mode of constructing the chevaux-de-frise was a contrivance of " General Putman's ; " and, in support of that statement, he quoted from a letter written by the General to General Gates, dated July 20th, in which were these words ; " We are preparing chevaux-dc-frise, at which " we make great dispatch by the help of ships, which are to be sunk ; a " scheme of mine, which you may be assured is very simple, a plan of "which I send you." Had not the General's own words been given in support of the state- ment, we should have supposed the Doctor had mistaken the General for Colonel Rufns Putnam, who was an Engineer: and the more so, since even the most zealous of the General's biographers and eulogists are silent, on this subject. Possibly, however, that silence may be accounted for, from the result of the professional stupidity of the Engineer, whom- soever he may have been. 5 In this instance. General Washington was mistaken, since the "shipa "suffered much, in their masts and rigging;" and Captain Parker sub- sequently reported that the Pho-nix lost a Midshipman, two Seamen, and one Servant, killed, and a Boatswain, a Carpenter, eight Seamen, a Ser- vant, a negro Man, and a private Marine, wounded ; that the Jioebuck lost a Lieutenant, a Midshipman, and two Seamen, killed, and a Mid- shipman, two Seamen, and a Corporal of Marines, wounded ; and that the Tartar lost a Midshipman, killed, and a Lieutenaut of Marines wounded. — (Keport of the Kilted and Woimded on board His Majesty's Ships past- ing the Batteries, the 0th of October, 1776.) See, also. Admiral Lord Howe's despatch to the Secretary of the Ad- miralty, "Eagle off New-Y^oek, November 23, 1776." ''General Washington to the Congress, "Heights of Harlem, 7 Octo- " her, 1776," postscript, dated "October Oth Lietitenaut colonel Tench Tilghman to tlie CommHtte of Safety, " HEAD-Ql AitTERS, Hablem-U eights, "9 Octr, 1776 ;" General George Clinton iothe Convention, " King's Beidgi, " 10 October, 1776 ; " The New-York Gazette and the Weekly Mercury No. 1 fe =4 -*'« OF THE OPEiiATiONs of (li(> Kings Xmvx under the ('oiiiniaiul of General S" Willi am Howe KB . 1 X N K ^^ ^'o H K .1X1} East New rlEitsin' Agaiiift (he AmKIIICAN' FOU ( KS Coiiminnded Bv Cnxeral M'asiiingtos. Fi-imi the IT'' nfOclohrr to th( '.'J"" nl'Nnvmihir I lIG Wlipi'cin Ls I'iirl iciilai'lvDivlin^inslietl The Exc^ACKMENT oullie WllTK PliAINS llu'W^ofOdohif Bv Claude JosErii Sadthi khiEh^ibvpJ ly W« Faden./w 1 1'omoptxJi- , OtlANGK SI (*2 SS^A-e/tiJiml midn- 1 t i r T |V,0 II If 1, E O X > THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 403 It would not have been very apparent how these vessels could have passed such seemingly Ibrniidable obstructions, "without the least difhculty," nor for what especial reason General Washington was " sur- " prised and mortified," when such a passage had been successfully acoinplished, had not General George Clinton, who commanded the Militia of the State who had been called out for the reinforcement of the Continental Army, at Kingsbridge, informed the Convention that the ships had " passed by, in shore, " East of our obstructions in the river" ' — that the deep waters of the river, in shore, immediately around the point which juts into the river, at that place, had been left entirely unprotected — a fact which reflects very little credit on the skill or the forethought of either the Engineer or those who were employed in build- ing the obstructions, especially since the Phanix and the Roue and their respective tenders had ]>assed the same obstructions, in the same way, on the eighteenth of August, after the galleys and the fireships had rendered their longer stay, in the waters of the Hudson-river, both unprofitable and hazardous.'^ After the vessels had passed the obstructions, they ran up the river as far as Dobbs's-ferry, where they again cast anchor. On their passage up the river, they captured two or three small river-craft — one (/f them loaded with Rum, Sugar, Wine, etc. — and sunk a sloop which had on board a machine invented by Mr. Bushnell, for blowing up the British Fleet.' Two new ships, purchased for the further obstruction of the channel of the river, were driven ashore, near Yonkers — one of them was afterwards recovered, how- ever, by a party of men whom General Clinton sent from Kingsbridge, for that purpose ;* and two galleys, which had been stationed near the obstructions, were also driven ashore, near Dobbs's-ferry, and captured by the enemy.* While the ships were at anchor, off 1303, Xew-York, Slonday, October 14, 177G ; The Freeman's Journal and Xeic-Hampiihire Gazelle, Volume 1, Number 27, Portsmouth, Tuesday, November 26, 1770; The Pennsylvania Journal, No. 1767, Philadelphia, WednestUiy, October 16, 1776; Sauthier's Plan of the Operations of the Xfng't Army under the comnuwd of General WUliam Howe, K. B., in Nta York and But Xew Jersey, Ed. London : 1777 — opposite — ; Memoirt •/ Geiieiear« that more than one of them was brought off. See, however, £i«i/«ia«/-fo/o«f/ Tilghman to General Bealh, " Head-qI'abtkrs, October 9, 1776;" Cb/o«oJ Heed to the same, "October 9, 1770 ; " Gnirral i'uf/iain to the same, " Wednesday, noon ; " lieutenant-colonel Tilghman to Jlobert R. Livingston, " IIead-quajetees, " Hari.em IIeiohts, October 10, 1776 ;" etc. • ti«uinry, October 9, 1776; Colonel Sar- gent to Gtneral Heath, " Half piust two o'clock at night, DoBU's Ferry, " October 10, 1770 ; " General Heath's Orders to Colonel Sargent, " KiNu's '• Bridge, October 10, 1776 ; " etc. * We have not found a file of Gaine's AVw- Tort Gazelle and the Weekly Mercury of the latter portion of 1770 ; and the well-informed Mr. Kclby, of the New Y'ork Historical Society, informs us that such a file is not known to him, anywhere. 404 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. which it should have received, at an earlier day, and of which it was in great need.' The enemy's Squadron got under way, again, dur- ing the evening, and sailed up the river, as far as Tarrytown ; where it anchored, and remained during the entire period which was occupied by those stirring and momentous events of which their own movement, up the Hudson-river, was the earlier portion. - When the information of that movement of the enemy's ships reached the Committee of Safety, at Fishkill, it was, evidently, very much alarmed ; but, with that promptitude which the emergency de- manded, it immediately ordered three hundred of the Militia of Ulster-county to be sent down, without any delay, to Peekskill, " well armed and accoutred, "and with three days' provisions;" that a sufficient number of the Militia of Orange-county, below the mountains — now Rockland-county — should be called out for the due protection of that portion of the western bank of the river, and one hundred from the Militia of the same County, above the mountains, should be called out and sent to Peekskill, with three days' provisions; that all ihe Rangers which had been enlisted for the protection of the frontiers of Ulster- county should be marched to Fishkill, evidently for the purpose of holding the more violent of the disaf- fected, in Duchess-county, in check ; and it also sent expresses to General Schuyler, commanding the Northern Army, and to General George Clinton, at Kingsbridge, declaring its helplessness and begging " the most speedy succour." It also wrote a letter to General Washington, in which the condition of the country was thus described ; "Nothing can be more " alarming than the present situation of our State. " We are daily getting the most authentic intelli- "gence of bodies of men, enlisted and armed, with " orders to assist the enemy. We much fear that " those, co-operating with the enemy, will seize such " passes as will cut off all communication between the " Army and us, and prevent your supplies. We "dare not trust any more of the Militia out of this "County, [Z>Mc/tess.] We have called for some aid " from the two adjoining ones ; but beg leave to .sug- " gest to your Excellency the propriety of sending a " body of men to the Highlands or Peekskill, to 1 General Washington to the Conlinenlal Congress, " Heights of Haer- " LEM, 7 October, 177C," postscript dated, "October 9th ;" the same to General Schai/ler, " HEAD-QUABTKns, Harlem Heights, October 10, " 177G." 2 Lieutenant-colonel Tilghman to Ihe Convention, " Head-qvabteks, " Harlem-Heights, October 10, 1770 ; " Colonel Sargent to General Heath, " Half- past two o'clock at uight, Dobb's Ferrv, October 10, 1776;"* Colonel Ann Hatvlces Ilaij to the Convention, " HAVEBSTaAw, October 10, "1770;" * It is very evident that this letter was written at half-past two o'clock in the morning of the tenth of October, since it was received, at King's Bridge, and answered, by General Heath, on that day ; and the Colonel and his command, pursuant to Orders thus conveyed, countermarched to King's Bridge, where they arrived " At Night," of the same day.— (Gene- ra; Heath's Orders to Colonel Sargent, " Kings Bridge, October 10, 1776 ;" David How's Diari/, 10 October, 1776 ; Memoir of General Heatli, i;9.) "secure the passes, prevent insurrections, and over- " awe the disaffected. We suppose your Excellency " has taken the necessary steps to prevent their land- " ing of any men from the ships, should they be so " inclined, as no reliance at all can be placed on the " Militia of Westchester-county." Two days after- wards, Robert R. Livingston, himself a memb* of the Committee of Safety and present when the letter from which we have quoted was written, addressed a personal letter, appealing to General Washington to do, for the protection of the Highlands — behind which all the immense estates of the Livingston family were, then, very securely situated — and for that of the State, what he, therein, elaborately described; although he must have known, when it was written, that General Washington could not, possibly, comply with a single one of the many requests which that letter contained.* In the same connection, and in order that the reader may understand the temper of the great body of the people, beyond the limits of Duchess and Westchester-counties, we find room for the reply of the Colonel commanding the Militia of Orange- county, below the mountains, to the requisition which was made, by the Committee of Safety, for men enough to protect that portion of the western bank of the river, to which reference has been made. It was in these words : " We are in daily expectation of "their" [the ships] "proceeding up the river; and I am "sorry to inform the Committee of Safety that, should "they attempt to land with one barge, I cannot com- "mand a force sufficient to j)revent their penetrating ''the country. I have exerted myself to muster the "Militia, but have liot been able to raise a guard of "more than thirty- eight men of my Regiment, at one "time, at Nyack.^ The wood-cutters employed by "order of General Heath have been with me, but "have received orders to proceed in cutting wood for "the Army; and I have not, at present, but eleven "men to guard the shore between Verdudigo Hook "and Stony Point.* In this situation, I leave the "Committee of Safety to determine what can be ex- "pected from me, in a way of opposition. " My whole Regiment consi.sts of but three hundred "men : most of them are without arms, they having "been taken for the Continental troops. Most of my "men refuse to attend the service, though repeatedly ^Journal of the Committee of Safety, " Tliursday afternoon, Octor. 10, "1776." * Robert It. Licingston to General Washington, "Fishkill, 12 October, "1776." 5 As the ships were anchored off Nyack as well as off Tarrytown, those Tillages being exactly opposite, the former on the western and the latter on the eastern bank of the river, and as two boats" crews had made an attempt to go ashore, at Nyack, on the preceding Sunday, it will be seen why the Colonel mentioned Nyack, especially, in his despatch to the Committee of Safety. I' The shore-line thus described includes the entire western bank of that portion of the Hudson-river which is known as Haverstraw Bay, extend- ing from a short distance above Nyack to within a short distance from the southernmost entrance into tlie Highlands. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 405 " summoned. Many reasons are assigned for this " desertion of the service, such as, that the troops last " raised were, by the Convention, expressly levied for "the purpose of protecting the shore; that this in- " duced many of their people to enlist, but they have " been drawn off from the immediate defence of their " wives, children, and property, to guard the eastern " shore of the river, contrary to their expectations. " Others declare that if they leave their business, " their families must starve, as they have all their " Corn and Buckwheat to secure, and have been so "called off, during the Summer, by the public "troubles, as not to have been able to put in the "ground, any Winter Grain, and would, therefore, as " leave die by the sword as by famine. A third set, " and the most numerous, declare that the Congress " have rejected all overtures for a reconciliation, in- " consistent with Independency; that all they desire "is peace, liberty, and safety; and that if they can "procure that, they are contented." ' It will be seen, from this official statement, that there were other Militia than that of ^V■ estchester- county on whom "no reliance at all could be placed," in that hour of extreme danger; and, when t;iken into consideration, in connection with the facts that the Counties of Richmond. Kings, Queens, and Suf- folk had returned to their allegiance to the King ; that Duchess-county was in open and armed op])osi- tiou to the Convention, and was kept in subjection only by the occupation of the County and the support of the few friends of the Convention who lived there, by five hundred armed men, drawn from Connecticut; and that the Manorof Livin^^ston, including the whole of the lower portion of Albany-county, was almost entirely " disaffected," Colonel Hay's exposition of the temper of the farmers of Orange-county very clearly established the fact that "disaffection" was not peculiar to the farmers of Westchester-county ; and that the Declaration of Independence had not been received with any favor, by the greater number of the inhabitants of New York. The purposes of the enemy, in sending the Phtrni.v and her consorts up the Hudson-river and in anchor- ing them off Tarrytown, as we have seen, were var- iously interpreted by General Washington and the Committee of Safety; and they have continued to receive the scattered attention of those who have written on the subject, to this day.- But, while the 1 Colonel Am Hauies Hag to the Convention, " Havebstsaw, Octor. " 15, 177C." 2 Miirshnll, (Life of George Waehiiiglon, Ed. Philudelphia : 1804, ii., 495,496,) very accurately, stated the object of tlie movement was to se- cure to Geueral Howe tlip possession of the North-river above Kings- bridge, without, liowever, stating more than that. Sparks, (Life of Gturge WmhiiigUjn, Ed Boston : 1842, l'J4,) said they "secured a free passage to " the Highlands, thi ieby preventing any supplies, from coming to the " American .\rmy, by water." Hihheth, {llitlorij of the United Slatef, ill., 154,) said, only, they " cut off all supplies from the country. South " and West of that river," the Hudson. Bancroft, (Wtlory j/ Ihe Vnilxd State*, original edition, ix., 174 ; the name, centenary edition, v., 439,) surmises of General Washington and those of the Convention were thrown out before the ships had reached the anchorage-ground to which they had been ordered and, therefore, before either their des- tination or the purposes for which they had been ordered to move up to Tarrytown were definitely made known to any one, except to their own OfKcers, there is no evidence whatever, in the subsequent conduct of those ships, to give the slightest weight to any of those earlier surmises, no matter by whom originated; and the direction in which the ahirm of the Commander-in-chief and the Convention trended, in the light afforded by immediately subsequent events, was, certainly, not the right one — the ships certainly made no attempt to renew the previously unsuccessful attempt to give countenance and sup- port, for military purposes, to the disaffected farmers of Westchester-county: they certainly made no at- tempt whatever to seize the forts in the Highlands and to occupy the water communication through the Highlands : and there is not the slightest evidence that they effected or attempted to effect combinations with anybody, on shore, for any purpose whatever. Had their purpose been to cut off the supplies of the American Army, as some have supposed and stated — a project which would have been unnecessary, if the American Army was to be obliged to abandon its strong position, near Kingsbridge, in order to prevent the enemy from falling on its rear — the ships would not have anchored at so great a distance from the American lines ; nor would they have chosen, as their station, the widest part of the river, at that place quite three miles wide, of which two-thirds or more are shoal-water, over which the small river-craft could pass and re-pass, with impunity ; while, within four miles, equally good anchorage grounds could have been found, equally safe from interference from the Americans, less exposed to the heavy winds of the season, which would have required not more th:in one- half the extent of guard-duty, and, at the same time, which would have been equally effective, for the pur- pose named. Had the purpose been, as others have supposed, to have obstructed the retreat of the Amer- ican Army and the removal of its stores and heavy guns, by water, it is equally strange that the place which was designated for the anchorage of the ships was situated not far from ten miles above the Ameri- can lines, within which General Washington held an referred to nothing else than to the Phmnix and the Roebucli and the ten- ders; and, very cautiously, for reasons which are not unknown to us, he said nothing whatever concerning the purposes of the expedition. Ir- \iog, (Life of Wiishinglon, Ed. Sew York; 185(5, ii., 3(i7-;)73,) in Ihe most carefully prepared descriplion of all, with a grave error in his de- scription of the passage of the ships through Ihe obstructions, and another in making General Washington do what was done by General Heath, recited all the surniisei. of the inhabitants and others, concern- ing the object of the movement, without pretending to offer any of his own. No other writer of the history of that period has noticed the subject, notwithstanding its great importance. 406 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. undisputed line of communication with New Jersey, protected by tlie guns of both Fort Washington and Fort Lee, over which, if adversity had overtaken him, he could have securely retreated. For these reasons, and with the knowledge which all the events of that period in which that particular Squadron was con- cerned, has imparted, we have seen no reason for con- curring with those who have already written concern- ing the purposes of General Howe, in the removal of the Squadron which had covered the left flank of his lines, from its anchorage, off Bloomingdale, to a dis- tant anchorage, off Tarrytown, when he had no fur- ther use for it, at the former station, and expected to make it useful, for the same purpose, in the latter ; and, at the same time, from the best evidence which we have been able to control, we have formed an opin- ion, concerning those purposes, which differs from all those to which we have referred and of all of which we have heard. That opinion may be thus stated : when preparations were being made by Gen- eral Howe, for the military occupation of the City of New York, before any movement for that purpose was actually made, these ships were moved up the Hudson-river, on the opposite side of the island, for the purpose, as General Howe subsequently informed the Home Government, of drawing the attention of the Americans to that side, while the real operations were to be made on the other side. In short, the movement, on that occasion, was, primarily, a feint ; but it had served, also, to command the lower por- tion of the river ; to prevent the retreating Americans from removing their stores or heavy guns, from the City to Kingsbridge, by water ; and, therefore, to throw into the hands of the Royal Army, both stores and guns which the Americans could ill-afford to lose. Subsequent to the establishment of the former, in the City of New York, the Squadron, at its anchor- age, off Bloomingdale, had effectually covered the left flank of the enemy's lines, which, without such a protection, would have been negligently exposed to the well-known enterprise of the Americans ; and, as far as we have seen it, there is not the slightest evi- dence that the Squadron had been engaged in any other service. At the time now under notice, Gen- eral Howe was again preparing to move his great command, at that time, by way of the Sound, into Westchcster-county ; and he did no more, concern- ing that Squadron, in that connection, than he had done, in the former instance, when he had moved that command from Long Island to the City of New York — he caused it to be moved further up the river, evidently, again, in order "to draw the enemy's" l_the Americans'^ " attention to that side," while he and his command should effect a landing, on the other side of the County, with lesser opposition and difficulty ; and it is not improbable, in view of the recognized purposes of General Howe, in proposing to move his command into Westchester-county, that it was expected, also, to cover that flank of the Army, in whatever operations it should become engaged, within that County. We believe that these were the only purposes for which the Squadron was moved up the river ; and we also believe that, for the purpose of a feint, the movement was, again, an entire success : be- cause of the subsequent movements of the two Armies, it was not required for any other purpose. Having detached two Brigades of British and one Brigade of Hessian troops, the whole under the com- mand of Lieutenant-general Earl Percy, to occupy the exterior lines, on the high grounds to the south- ward of the Harlem-plain, for the protection of the City of New York,^ and another Brigade of British troops to garrison the City itself,^ "all previous arrange- "ments, having been made," early on the morning of Saturday, the twelfth of October, the first detachment of the forces designated for that purpose, under the personal command of General Howe, embarked, at Kip's-bay,' in the City of New York, in flat-boats, batteaux, etc. ; and, having passed through Hell- gate, landed — the Cary/ort, frigate, having been so placed that she could cover the descent — about nine o'clock in the morning, on Throgg's-neck, in the Borough Town of Westchester, in Westchester- county.* It was an exceedingly foggy morning; ^ and, from the fact that General Washington made no allusion to the enemy's movement, in letters written by him, on that day, respectively, to the President of the Con- gress and to Governor Cooke, of Rhode Island, not- withstanding his Headquarters, in the elegant man- sion of Colonel Roger Morris, more recently owned ' General Home to Lord George Germame, " New York, November 30, "1776." 2 General Howe made no mention of a third Brigade of British troops having been left, to garrison the City ; but common sense tells us there must have been siicli a Garrison, within the thickly settled portions of the City; and Captain Hall, (HisWrij nf the Civil iVar in America, i.,203,) and Stedman, (Hisionj o f the American War, i., 210,) both of them officers of the Royal Army, have left records of the fact. 3 Captain Hall, (History of the VivU liar i'k America, i., 203,) said the troops were embarked, for this movement, in Titrtle h&y ; but, inasmuch as the naval portiuns of the movement were made under the personal superintendence of Admiral Lord Howe, we have preferred his statement, in his despatch to the Admiralty, ("Eagle, off 'New-York, November "2.!, 1T7G,") that the embarkation was at Kip's-ba.y. *Admiral Lord Howe to Mr. Stcpliens, Secretarijof the Admiralty, " Eagle, "off New-York, November 23, 1776;" General Howe to Lord George Germaine, "New-York, November 30, 1776;" General 'Washiitgton to General Heath, " Headquarters, October 12,1776 ;"' the same to the Con- gress, "Heights OF Haerlem, 12 October, 1776," postscript dated, "Oc- " tober 13th ; " Diary of David Htm, October 12, 1776 ; General Wathing- ton to Governor Cooke, "Headquarters, Harlem Heights, October 12, " 1776;" postscript dated " October I3th ; " CJolonel SmalUcood to the Maryland Convention, "Camp OF THE JIaryland Regulars, Head-quae- " TERS, October 12, 1776 ; " Extract of a letter from Harlem, in The Penn- sylvania Evening Post, Voluni" 2, Number 271, Philadelphia, Tuesday, October 15, 1776 ; the same, in The Pennsylvania Journal, No. 1767, Phil- adelphia, Wednesday, October 16, 1776 ; [Hall's] History of the Civil War in America, i., 203; Stedman's History of the Amei ican War. i., 210 ; Gor- don's Histwy of lite American ItevoUUion, ii., 336 ; Memoir of General Heath, 70 ; etc. 6 Admiral Lord Howe to Mr. Stephens. Secretary to the Admiralty, " Ea- '■ gle, off New-York, November 23, 1776;" General Howe to Lord George G«rrmaiHe, " New YoRK, 30 November, 1776 ;" [Hall's] History of the Civil War in America, i., 203. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION. 1774-1783. 4(17 by lladame Jumel,' commanded a fine view of the East-river and Sound; and because the intelligence of the movement which he first received, was con- veyed to him, by express, from General Heath, after the landing had been made,* it may be reasonably supposed that the movement of the Royal Army, into Westchester-county, was unknown to him, until after it had been accomi)lished ; that the left flank of the American Army had been successfully turned, a sec- ond time, without his knowledge ; and that the latter was placed, again, by reason of that successful move- ment of the enemy, in such a critical situation that its very existence was threatened — it is noteworthy, also, that if a dense log had served to secure the es- cape of the American Army from what appeared to have threatened its entire destruction, at Brooklyn, a similarly dense fog, on the occasion now under notice, had afforded a similar advantage to the Royal Army, in its effort to recover the great military advantages which it had lost, on the former occasion. During the afternoon of the same day, [^October 12, 1776,] the second detachment of the Royal Army passed Hell-gate, in forty-two sail of vessels, includ- ing nine ships ; and it was, also, safely landed.' The naval portion of that very important movement was performed under the personal supervision of Admiral Lord Howe, assisted by Commodore Ho- tham ; and the assistance of most of the Captains of the Fleet and that of the naval officers, in general, which were freely given, secured, for that difficult movement, the most complete success, the only loss sustained having been that of an artillery-boat, with three six-pounders and three men, which was upset and sunk by the rapidity of the current,* probably in Hell-gate. General Howe, notwithstanding his successful oc- cupation of Westchester-county, was made the object of much censure, because of his movement to Throgg's-neck, first, because of the danger to which the City of New York was exposed by the withdrawal of so large a portion of the Army ; and the tempta- tion which was offered to General Washington to 1 The fine old mansion still uccnpies its place, with few, if any, altera- tions, ou the high grounds forming the southern bunk of the Harlem- river, near One hundred and sixtj-ninth-street. a little helow the High- bridge of the Crotou-acqueduct. Madame Jumel, who was al»o the widow of Aaron Burr, has been dcail, many yeara ; and the right to the owner- ship of the property has been bitterly contested, in the Courts ; but the old house remains — and long may it remain. - Colonel Uurrisons replij^ uiuler General Washington't ingtructiottg^ " Uead-qi aetebs, Octolwr 12, I77C ; " Colonel Kicing to the Maryland Council of Siifetij, " Camp near Hableh, October 13, 1776." ' General Wofhinyton to the Conrjrest, " Ueigiits or Harlex, 12 Octo- "ber, 1776;" postscript, dated "October i;!th ; " Uie same to General Ward, " Head-quarters, Harlem Heights, October 13, 1776 ; " Eitract of a Letter from Harlem, dated October 13, in The Peurunjlcania Ecening Potl, Volume 2, Number 271, Philadelphia, Tuesday, October 15, 1776 ; the tame, in The PenmyUatiia Join-nat, So. 1767, Philadelphia, Wednes- day, October 16, 1776; Memoin of General Heath, 71. * Admiral Lord Hoiceto Mr. Utepheiit, Secretary to the Admiralty, "Ea- "OLE, OFF New-York, November 23, 1776 ;" General Huice to Lord George Germaine, "New- York, 30 November, 1776 ; " [Uall'sJ ifu7, i., 235 ;) bnt he Rave no authority for the statement, and wo have found none ; and we preler to believe that the proffered help wa« not accepted, at ," postscript, signed by rhris'r Richmond, .\djutant, anil dated "Sunday, Octoljer 13, 177C; " Coltmfl Firing In Ike Mnnilnnd Count U of Sn felif, " C.KMP KE.KR IIari.f.M, October 13, 1776;" Memiiira of (;,„e, fU Jl.:„lli, 71. with that Order, the record of that great day in the history of Westchester-county was closed. On the following morning, [Sundai/, October 13, 1776,] General Washington became almost satisfied that the enemy's movement was not a feint ; that his main body was on Throgg's-neck ; and that he "had " in view the prosecution of his original plan, that of " getting in the rear of the Americans and of cutting "off their communication with the country."^ That change in the General's opinion, as far as there was a change, appears to have been produced by the fact that General Howe had made no attempt to make a land- ing at Morrisania, as the former had supposed he would have done; and, the first time, he "thought it " would be advisable" to reinforce and protect the troops who had been, for more than twenty-four hours, guarding the two passes through which the enemy could open communications with the main- land ; and he " recommended" the posting of small bodies of observation, at Pell's-point, at the mouth of Hutchinson's-river, at Hunt's-point, and at Willett's- point, without, however, giving an Order, for the execution of either of these." At the same time, he strengthened the force already in Westchester-county, by moving the Brigade which had formerly been commanded by General Heath, for its support.^ He also ordered Colonel Tash, with his Regiment of New Hampshire Militia, then at the White Plains, to march to Fishkill, " with all possible despatch," for the assistance of the Committee of Safety, in hold- ing the disaffected in check; * he called a meeting of the General Officers, at noon, "at or near King's " Bridge," — as " we are strangers to a suitable place," it was left for General Heath to determine where he would have them meet;* and, finally, in these ringing sentences, he attempted to arouse the Army to a sense 6 GenereU Wathington to General Ward, " HEAD-QrARTEftS, Hablrh " Heights, October 13, 1776." '"I beg leave to inform you that his Excellency (as the enemy did not " attempt landing at Jlforrtsania, this morning,) thinks it would bo ad- visable to send a stronger force towards the two passes, near the enemy, "where our men Were posted, yesterday, and also to tlirowupsome " works for tlieir cover and defence. lie also rcconmiends strongly to " your attention, the keepingagood look out at I'ell's-point, at the mouth " of E;istch( ster creek, and at Hunt's and Willett's-points, for the sake of "gaining intelligence, these posts to be regarded as look outs only." {Colonel William Grayion, A.D.C. to General Heath, " IIkad qi'artkrs, "October 13, 177C.") " MemnirH of Gt>neral Heath, 71, H General IVaitliington to Colonel Taxh, " IIeao-qdarters, October 13, "1776;" C'donel It. H. Harriium In the Congress, " HEAD-QtJARTER.s, " IIari.km Heights, October 14, 1776." It is proper for us to say, in this pl.aco, that the Committee desired only two Companies ; and ordered the remainder of the Regiment back to Peeksklll, {Cohmel Thomas Tash In the Krw Hampshire Committee of Safflii, " I'EAK.SKii.i,, IN Coi RTLANn Manor, October 26, 1776.") » CoUmel Joseph Keid to General Heath, "October 13, 1776." It was stated in Colonel Reed's note that " it being necessary, since the "late movement of the enemy, to form some plan" of operations for the .Vmerii'.an .\rmy, it is only reasonable to sup|K>se theGeneral Officers were called together, for an Interchange of opinions, on that subject. The Ciuincil was evidently convened at General Heath's quarters, {Memoirs nf General Hfalb, 71 ;) Imt nothing appears to have been done, because, it- is said, of the absence of Generals Lee, Greene, and Meitser. 410 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of its duty, to the country and to the world : " Aa the " enemy seem, now, to be endeavouring to strike some "stroke, before the close of the Campaign, " were his words, " the General most earnestly conjures both Offi- " cers and men, if they have any love for their country " and concern for its liberties and regard to the safety "of their parents, wives, children, and countrymen, " that they will act with bravery and spirit, becoming " the cause in which they are engaged ; and to encour- "age and animate chem so to do, there is every ad- " vantage of ground and situation, so that, if we do "not conquer, it must be our own faults. How much " better will it be to die honourably, fighting in the " field, than to return home, covered with shame and "disgrace, even if the cruelty of the enemy should " allow you to return ! A brave and gallant beha- " viour, for a few days, and patience, under some lit- " tie hardships, may save our country and enable us " to go into Winter^qUarters with safety and honour." On the morning of the fourteenth of October, Gen- eral Heath, with all the Generals under his com- mand, reconnoitred the enemy, on Throgg's-neck ; ^ and, soon afterwards. General Washington, accom- panied by the Generals of the Army who were at Head-quarters, also visited all the posts, beyond Kingsbridge, and the several passes and roadways which led from Throgg's-neck and from the adjacent Necks, into the country,' acquainting himself, as far as he could do so, by personal reconnaissance, with the strength and position and purposes of the enemy ; with the character and condition of the outlets, from Throgg's-neck and from the other similar, but leaser. Necks, in that vicinity, from which the enemy might incline to move into the interior of the County; with the capabilities, for defensive purposes, which those outlets severally possessed ; and with the necessities, for military purposes, which each of these several subjects presented, for his attention. During the same day, [October 14,] General Lee reached Head -quarters, on his return from the South; and the command of all the troops in Westchester- county, then the greater portion of the Army, was given to him, with the request, however, that he would not assume the command until he should have made himself acquainted with the different portions of the post, their circumstances, and the arrange- ments of the troops which had been made; * and, in 1 General Orders, " HKAD-QUABtKuS; BAHLEat HkIghts, OctoW l.^, " 1776." 2 Memoirs of leiieral Ilealh, 71. 3 Colonel HarrUon to the Cmtgress, " IlKAii-in Ani KUS, IIauI.kM Heights, " October 14, 1770 ; " Oic same to Peter R. Linngslon, " IlEAD-QiiAKTEns, " Hari.km HKKiiiTS, Octuber 14, 1770 : Memoirs of thmcrul Uenth, 71. 4 Memoirs of General Heathy 71 . There is nothing which indic.ited the general consciousness of the help- lessness of the country, ut the time of whidh we write, as much as the general dependence of the country, as well as that of the Army, on Gen- eral Charles Lee, an officer of large military pretentions; the ambitious leader of that party, in the Congress and elsewhere — mainly New Eng- landers — who was inclined to depreciate, if not to (piticially embarrass, General W ashington ; and the self-appoinled and very w illing and very the General Orders of the day, the Commander-in- chief ordered Colonel Bailey's Regiment to join General Clinton's Brigade, and Colonel Lippet's Regiment to join General McDougal's Brigade — each of them "to take their tents and cooking utensils, "and to lose no time;" — the two Connecticut Regi- ments, commanded, respectively, by Colonel Storrs and Major Graves, were ordered " to be in readiness " to march into Westchester, at a moment's warning;" and Generals Putnam and Spencer, the former com- manding Heard's, Beall's, and Weedon's Brigades, and the latter commanding Lord Stirling's, Wads- worth's, and Fellows's Brigades, were ordered to re- main on Harlem Heights and to continue the works of entrenchment thereon. General Putnam on all those proposed defensive works which were above Head-quarters, including those of Fort Wiishington :^ those below Head-quarters, immediately in front of the enemy's works, which were occupied by Lieuten- ant-general the Earl of Percy and three Brigades, having been assigned to General Spencer.^ As General Heath was continued in the command of all the troops within Westchester-county, until further orders, notwithstanding the assignment of General Lee to the same command, the former in- structed General Nixon, who had been ordered from New Jersey, with his Brigade, to " have the troops "which have mnrched, this day, to the eastward of " the Bridge, by Williams's," ' [ Williams' s-bridge,] "comple.ely ready to turn out, in case the enemy "should make an attack, that night;" instructing him, at the same time, "should the attack be made unscnipulous critic of everything and everybody, unless of himself and of those who were pandering to his unholy ambition and applauding even his scurrility. He wieJded a very glib, but a very poisonous, tongue, and a sharp and venomous |>en, both of which were ready for immediate use, whenever his paiixions or his interests reipiired their co operation. He was generally haughty, in bis demeanor ; he was alw.ays unprincipled, for good ; he never ceased to be avaricious, even to meanness and dis- honesty. A huckster of his own political and military opinions and as eociations, he was never contented wiih the prices which his wares com- manded in the market of the world ; and, after he had disgusted even his own party and had become, himself, disgusted with all mankind, ho died, *' unwept, unhonoreil, and unsung." The country has had other men of straw whom it has also grasped, in its hours of great an.xiety and great danger, almost counterparts of that on whom the .\rniy and the country leaned, so confidently and so lovingly, from early in 1775 until the Sunnuer of 1778 ; and just as the broken reed of that early period pierced the hand which leaned on it, so have these latter pretenders, these latter selfish and unpatriotic tools »f un- scrupulous and designing men, wounded those whose confidence they had secured, and brought shame and dishonor on the country which had petted them. s The position assigned to Maji»r-gen<-ra! I*u(?iam, not immediately in front of the enemy, but, in the ri ar, where In^ could do no more th.an oversee the construction of certain specifii'd defensive works, is peculiarly noteworthy — the disiister on Long Island wiis too distinctly renienilwred to allow him to be posted, again, where he could possibly do any harm. ''General Orders, " Heah-qvartkhs, Habi.f.m Heights, October 14, '"1770." ' We have not found any other description of these troops than what General Heath and David How wrote concerning them : the former saying, "two or three Brigades have moved, this day. beyond Wil- "liams's;" (Letter to Colonel Horrient, "Kixii's BRinuE, October 14, " 1770 ;") and the latter, " 14. There has bi'eii two Brigades JlarchJ By '• hear This Day Towards forgg's point." (Diary, " October 14, 1770.") THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 411 " towards Frog's Point," to " endeavour to support "the Regiments that are posted at the passes, there;" " should the attack be made at or near East Chester " binding," to " make the best disposition of his "troops and repel the enemy;" and if any new movement of the enemy should be discovered, "to " send notice thereof, immediately, by one of the " Liglit-horsemen." General Heath also informed Gen- eral Nixon "that a guard was absolutely necessary at " Rodman's-point," [the same ns Pell's-poinf, on the opposite side of the Hutchinson' s-river, from Tlirogg's- neck,\ "next to East-Chester-creek." He said that Colonel How was near the landing-place, " with a " Regiment of Militia;" but it was evident that not enough was known of Colonel How's military quali- fications for the command of so important a position ; and General Nixon was directed to make inquiries on the subject.' While the military authorities were thus engaged in preparing to meet the enemy, in arms, whenever the latter should endeavor to move from the Neck on which he was then quietly encamped, the Convention of New York, by its Committee of Safety, as we have already stated in our review of the proceedings of that Convention,^ as soon as information could have possibly reached it, that the enemy had moved towards Westchester-county, provided for the imme- diate disposition of all the- Cattle, Horses, Hogs, Sheep, Grain, Straw, and Hay, on the well-culti- vated farms throughout that County, in order that the enemy should not secure them for his Com- missariat ; and the careful reader may gather from that decided action of the Committee of Safety, how completely desolated all that flourishing County must have become, before that enemy secured a foot- hold on the main-land — indeed, before that foothold had been secured, all that portion of the County which was below Tarrytown, the White Plains, and Rye had, probably, been generally stripped of the various agricultural productions of that season, excepting only the Potatoes, the Buckwheat, and the Corn ; and, of the Live-stock, of every description, it is scarcely probable that any remained, within that portion of the County. In connection with this notice of the removal of the Live-stock and Crops, we may properly mention that, very largely, the inhabitants of those portions of the County which were likely to be exposed to the de- predations of either of the two Armies — and one of these Armies was quite as bad as the other, in the work of plunder and devastation and outrage — re- moved from their several rural homes, with as many of their effects as they could take with them, to places of supposed greater safety and it is scarcely proba- ' General Henlh to Oeneral A'lxon, " King's Bbidge, October 14, 1776." - Vide i>ag(>s 3!I7, 3!I8, aiite. 'Jounuil of the CommUtee of Safe^, "Monday morning, Octor. 14, "1776." * Tlio Morris fiiniily )utd left Horriaknia, at tlie first ap|>eumnce of diin- ble that, in all the lower Towns of the County, in which the tramp of armed men was soon to be heard, many of the inhabitants remained, unless, here and there, where the head of a family, accompanied by a faithful negro, lingered on the deserted homestead, in order that the property which could not be removed might not be left entirely uncared for. The Convention was also mindful of the danger to which the records of the City and County of New York, as well as those of the Borough of Westchester and those of the County of Westchester, were exposed, by the movement of the enemy into the last-named County. All these had been removed from their proper places and lodged, for greater safety, in private houses, in different parts of the County, where, it was feared, they would become exposed to the enemy: and William Miller, of Harrison's Precinct, Theodoras Bartow, of New Rochelle, and John Cozine were appointed Commissioners for collecting them and removing them to Kingston, in Ulster-county, with instructions to gather and remove the scattered papers, " with all possible expedition," and to deliver them, at Kingston, to Dirck Wynkoop, Abraham Hasbrouck, and Christopher Tappen ; and the Com- missioners were authorized to call for a military guard, " to attend the said records, in their removal."* On the fifteenth of October, the local Committee of Poundridge became so much alarmed, by reason of the movements of the "disaffected," in its vicinity, that the subject was laid before the Convention ; " and the local Convention, and even individual members of that body, continued to worry General Washington ger, (Lewis Mnn-ix to the Coiivenlion, "Philadelphia, Septr. 24, 1776.") John Jay obtained a leave of absence, on the fifteenth of Octolicr, to assist in the removal of his aged parents, with their effects, from tlieir home, at Kye, to a place of safety, one of the most honorable acts of his life, (Jonriial of Ihe (Jonreiition, "Tuesday afternoon, 15 October. 1770.") Tlie pathetic story nf rhoebe Oakley, {Petition, December 2, 177G,) and other evidences of equal value, clearly indicate that, among those who are less known to fame but equally worthy of respect, the removal of families and their effects, to places of supposed greater safety, at the time of which we writi', very generally prevailed. ^Journal of the Convention, "Tuesday morning, Octor. 15, 1776." "As the note of the Committee indicated the feeling of the more active of the disaffected, at that time — although the great body of those who were discontented matle no attempt to take up arms or to join the Royal Army, preferring to remain at home, in peace — we make room for it, in this place ; " Poi'KDRiDOE, October 15, A.D., 1776. " Hosoi'nF.D Sirs : " We, tlie Sub committee of Poundridge, in West-Chester County, " beg leave to inform your Honours that we are apprehensive that "there is danger of our prisoners leaving us and going to the Min- "isterial Army, as we are not more than nine or ten miles from the " water, where the Sound is full of the Ministerial ships and tenders. " One of our number is already gone to Long-Island, and numbers arc "gone from other places, which are, no doubt, now with the Minis- '• tcrial Army. There are disaffected pei-sons daily going over to them, " which gives us much trouble. Therefore, we humbly beg your Ilon- "ours would give us some directions concerning them, that they may " be 3p«!edily removed at some farther distance. We would also inform "you that for the misdemeanors of one of them and our own sjifety. we " have been oldiged to commit him to gaol at the White Plains. "These, with all proper respects, from yours to serve, " JosiIl'A Ambler, Chninnnn of Omimitlee. '•To THE IldSm RABLE CONVENTION OF THE STATE OK NeW-YoIIK." 412 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. with recitals of dangers from the " disafl'ected" who, singular as it appeared to those local despots, were not inclined to submit, passively, to whatever of insult or of injury those in revolution should be in- clined to impose on them — only in very exceptional instances, however, did that " disaflection" extend beyond a disinclination to approve, in formal words, all which the Congresses had done, while the inclina- tion to approve the Colonial policy of Great Britain was no stronger ; and the general disinclination to leave their homes and their families and to resort to arms, or to render any assistance whatever, which the "disafl'ected," everywhere, presented, was as pro- ductive of disappointment to the commanders of the Royal Army as it was to General Washington. Neither General Howe nor General Washington understood of what that disaflection " was gen- erally composed; and partisan writers and parti- san orators, from that day to this, have delighted to make that " disaffection" something else than it really was, and to invest the " disaffected," as a class, with characteristics and aims to which, unless in exceptional instances, they were strangers. Had the conservative farmers of Westchester-county — and these were not unlike the great bodies of the farmers, in all the Colonies — been permitted to dissent, quietly, from the policies of both the Home Gov- ernment and the Continental Congress, and to have approved, quietly, of the spirited opposi- tion to the Colonial policy of the Home Govern- ment and of the almost audacious demands for a redress of the grievances of the Colonics, which were made by the General Assembly of the Colony of New York, as they were certainly and generally inclined to do ; and had not the aristocratic and haughty leaders of the revolutionary faction, in New York, attempted to secure uniformity of merely po- litical opinions — and those to be only such opinions as they should dictate, by the methods which charac- terized the bigoted and relentless Clergy, in cases of religious dissent from their Calvinistic Congregation- alism, in puritannic Massachusetts and Connecticut — as the those high-toned leaders persistently attempted, it is doubtful if" disaffection " would have been heard of, unless in some individual instances, which would have been harmless because of their insignificance; and it is morally ceiiain that, if the love of home and the sense of wrongs inflicted by the Mother Country and the respect for those bearing authority, which everywhere prevailed, had been permitted to exercise the influences which they would have surely exercised, especially if they had been supported by that forbear- ance and by that respect for freedom of conscience, in political affairs, and by those aj^peals for harmony which every Christian man would have employed and none but civilized savages would have declined to em- ploy, New York, if not the entire Continent, would have appeared, in the Autumn of 177G, as she had ap- peared in the Spring of 1774, before the spirit of fac- tional strife had blighted the hopes of patriots, united, as one man, regardless of family feuds and ecclesiatical differences and social inequalities, demanding and, if needs be, supporting in arms, the Rights and the honor of the Colony and of the Continent. But that control- ling faction had other ends than those of the country's welfare in view ; and a narrow, bigoted, haughty, and relentless proscription and persecution of those whose political opinions differed from their own, very rea- sonably caused " disaffiection " among the victims, without, however, leading them, to any considerable extent,* to strike, in retaliation — they would have been worthy of all which was heaped on them, had they endured that proscription and that persecution, with- out becoming "disaffected:" it was honorable that, although " disaffected," they declined to take up arms, even in retaliation or self-defence, when those arms, thus employed, would have been employed against their own country. There does not appear to have been any movement, which is worthy of especial notice, in either Army, on the fifteenth of October; but in the General Orders of that day, Colonel Joseph Reed's Regiment was ordered to join the Brigade commanded by General McDougal; and Colonel Hutchinson's Regiment was ordered to join the Brigade commanded by General Clinton. The Regiments commanded, respectively, by Colonels Sargent, Ward, and Chester and by Lieu- tenant-colonel Storrs, were formed into a Brigade, to be commanded by Colonel Sargent; and the Regi- ments commanded, respectively, by Colonels Douglass, Ely, Horseford, and by Majors Rogers and Graves, were, also, formed into a Brigade, to be commanded by General Saltonstall. The several Brigades of the Army were formed into Divisions,- those commanded, respectively, by Brigadier-generals Heard, Beall, and Weedon were to form the Division to be commanded by Major-general Putnam ; those commanded, respect- ively, by Brigadier-generals Lord Stirling, Wads- worth, and Fellows were to form the Division to be commanded by Major-general Spencer; those com- manded, respectively, by Brigadier-generals Nixon, McDougal,and James Clinton, the last commanded by Colonel Glover, were to form the Division to be com- manded by Major-general Lee ; those commanded, respectively, by Brigadier-generals Parsons, Scott, and George Clinton were to form the Division to be com- 1 The reader has been, already, informed of what General Howe stated on the backwardness of the Colonists, even of those who had claimed to have been loyal, in talcing up arms against their own country, (vide jwjfs 3S8, 401 , ante.) We need not repeat the statements. 2 It is a noticeable fact, and one which has seriously perple.^ed those who have attempted to study the history of that period and, very often, has led them astray, that, until the time now under notice, the Eegiments of the Army were not, generally, arranged into Brigades and Divisions ; and that neither Brigadier-generals nor Major-generals had any specified Eegiments under their especial conunaiid— they com- manded those who were present and on duty, wherever they might hap- pen to be ; and it is hardly to be wondered at, th t there was so little of order and discipline in the Army : it is rather remarkable there were as much of them as there api)ears to have been. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 413 manded by Major-general Heath ; those commanded, respectively, by Brigadier-generals Saltonstall, Sar- gent, and Hand were to form the Division to be commanded by Major-general Sullivan ; iind the Massachusetts Militia, then serving with the Army, was to be formed into a Division to be commanded hy Majnr-general Lincoln.' At the same time, the Gen- eral, in the most pressing terms, exhorted all Officers commanding Divisions, Brigades, and Regiments, to have their Officers and the men under their respective commands properly informed of what was expected from them, that no confusion might arise in case they should be suddenly called to action, which, there was no kind of doubt, wns near at hand ; and he hoped and flattered himself that the only contention would he who should render the most acceptable service to his country and his j)osterity. He also desired that the Officers would be particularly attentive to the mens's Arms and ammunition, that there might be no deficiency or application for Cai fridges when they were called into the field. On Wednesday, the sixteenth of October, General Wa-hington, accompanied by the other Generals, made a carelul reconnaissance of the ground at and near Pell's or Rodman's-neck,'^ towards which, it is very evident, his attention had been particularly di- rected, as the point towards which the next move- ment of the enemy would probably be directed.* With all the information, concerning " the enemy's " intention to surround " the American Array, which the General had been able to .^ecure; with all the knowledge which his personal and careful reconnais- sance of the country had imparted to him ; and with all the intelligence concerning " the turbulence of " the disaffected in the upper parts of this State," which the Convention had communicated to him, he re-iissembled the Council of War which had met and adjourned on the preceding Sunday,^ {_October 13 ;] and he laid all these matters before it, for its consid- eration. That very notable Council was assembled at the Head-quarters of General Lee ; and, besides the Com- ' Although General Lincoln wns considered and named, in the Grnerul Ordef now under notice, as a Slajor-general, it is probable that that was only his rank in the .Militia of Massachusetts, since, in the Cunncil of War, which was held on the following day, [October 16,] ho w:is ranked aa only a Brigadier-general, and then only at the lower end of the line of Brigadiere. •Ueneral Ordcrt, " UEA»-QU.\BTEits, Uablem Heights, October 15, " 1776." ' Mrmoin of Gaieral Beulh, 71. * The first reconnaissance which the General made, after the enemy's occupution of Tlirogg's-neck, included "the Necks adjacent," so that he was not ignorant of the character of the ground on and near Pell's- Beck ; but, on the morning of the sixteenth— probably because of infor- mation received, on the preceding day, from some deserters from the fleet, who had been taken to Head-quarters and personally examined by the General, with evident confidence in their testimony, (OViimil Wimliinri- Im to Gocemor Tninibull, " HeaI)-«carters, Heights or Harlem, Octo- "bor 16, 1776,")— another and more minute exnminatioD of the ground was made, as stated in the text. 'Vide iiage 4l»U, ante. I mander-in-chief. Major-generals Lee, Putnam, Heath, Spencer, and Sullivan ; Brigadier-generals Lord Stir- ling, Mifflin, McDougal, Parsons, Nixon, Wadsworth, Scott, Fellows, Clinton, and Lincoln ; and Colonel Knox, commanding the Artillery, were present — al- though General Greene was at the Head-quarters of the Army, on Harlem-heights, he was evidently out of humor and was not present.® After the Command- er-in-chief had communicated to the assembled Gen- erals those letters from the Convention of the State and those " accounts of deserters showing the enemy's " intention to surround " the American Army, to which reference has been made, and after much con- sideration and debate, the following question was stated: "Whether, (it having appeared that the ob- '' structions in the North River have proved insnffi- " cient, and that the enemy's whole force is now in " our rear, on Frog Point,) it is now deemed possible, " in our present situation, to prevent the enemy from " cutting off the communication with the country and " compelling us to fight them, at all disadvantages, " or surrender prisoners at discretion?" With only one dissenting voice, that of Genera! George Clinton, the Council agreed that " it is not possible to prevent " the communication from being cut off ; and that " oue of the consequences mentioned in the question " must certainly follow." Largely, if not entirely, in deference to the expressed will of the Continental Congress, the Council resolved, however, apparently with entire unanimity, " that Fort Washington be re- " tained as long as possible." ' ^General Greene to Governor Uooke, " Hbad-qc aeters, New-York Is- "land, October 16, 177U." Singular ns it would appear to be, were not the propensity for securing all the honor which belongs to them and as much more as is possible, so genenilly prevalent among those who have occupied public places, Gor- don, who was so largely the exponent of General Greene's ujtinions and pretensions, made the latter take a leading part, in the Council, in op- posing the movement of the iVrmyfrom HarleniHeights ; but the official Minutes of the Council clearly show that General Greene was not present, and, therefore, could not have taken any part in the proceedings of that body, {CoDipiire the Proceedings of a Council of General Officers at the Head quartei-s of Gi nenil Lee, October 16, 1776, irilh Gordon's History of the American Revolution ii.. :t.'58.) '> ProceedinijB of a L'ounril of Getieral Officers held at the Head-quarters of General Lee, October 16, 177fi. Because of evident eiTors in the copy of that paper which is printed in Force's American Aichives, V.,ii.,ni7, 1118, we have preferred the copy of it, evidently taken from the original manuscript, which appears in Sparks's Writings of George Washington, Ed. Boston: 18.34, iv., 155, note. In his evidently new-born zeal, adverse to the military and personal rhanicter of General Charles Lee, Bancroft has exposed his entire ina- bility to understand and correctly describe a military movement, what- ever his capability of understanding and correctly describing a political movement nuiy be, in what he ha* written concerning '• the origin of " the retirement of the .\merican .-Vrmy from New York." (Histonjof the I'nited Stiites, Edit. Boston : 1860, ix., 175, note ; the same, centenai-y edi- tion, v., 440, note.) Ill his attempt to tiike from General Lee everthing of credit for having united with others, in ailvising that "retirement of the Amer "ican .\nuy from New York," which is now umler consideration, that venerable and distinguished histonan haj4 entirely disregarrled the action of that Council of War, in which the C'oniniander in-chief was officially informed, the first time, of the opinions of the General Officers, couccming the further occupation of the Heights of Harlem by the main botly of the American Army, on which opinions the General Orders for 414 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. The several positions occupied by the different por- tions of the Army, from day to day, have not been noticed, with any degree of particularity, in any of the official documents or publications of that period, as far as we have knowledge ; but it is evident that the command of Major-general Spencer was moved from the exterior lines, on the Heights of Harlem, to which it had been ordered on the preceding Monday, [^October 14,]' and carried into Westchester-county — the Brigades commanded, respectively, by Brigadier- generals Wadsworth and Fellows were moved to Kingsbridge,^ probably further northward ; and the Brigade commanded by Brigadier-general Lord Stir- ling, to which the Regiments commanded, respect- ively, by Colonels Weedon and Eeed were added,^ was pushed forward, first, to the Mile Square and, afterwards, to the White Plains.* A portion, if not the whole, of the Brigade commanded by Colonel Glover was evidently moved to support whatever guard there may have been posted on the outlet from Pell's, or Rodman's, neck ;^ two Regiments of the Massachu* that " retirement" were largely based, and from the date of which officially expressed opinions, alone, that of "the origin of the retire- "ment of the American Army from New York" can be accurately ascer- tained. Surely the histonan could not have been sincere when he described the hurried movement of the Regiment commanded by Colonel Small- wood, on the twelfth of October, to oppose the progress of the enemj' from Throgg's-neck, as a " retirement of the American Army from New " York ; " and because the weight of his authorities, in support of his fancy, was confined to a single letter, written by the Adjutjiut-general of the Army to his wife, on the day after the enemy lauded on Throgg's- neck, in which that officer said, " The principal part of this Army is "moved off this islaud " — a movement from the works on Harlem Heights, which was only for the purpose of holding the enemy in check, and that not, by any means, in fact, approaching a moveuieut of "the " principal part of the Army," m»r with either an intimation or a pretense that it was a " retirement of the American Army " from its strong posi- tion — without any other testimony whatever to support it, we are con- strained to attribute the statement under consideration, either to have been an ebullition of his antipathy against General Lee or one of the reasonable results of his ignorance of what was necessary to constitute a "retirement of the American Army from New Y'ork." It would have been more creditable to the authorial reputation of that venerable writer of history, had he read what General Washington in- structed his Secretary to write to the President of the Congress, on the seventeenth of October, the day after the Council had advised him of the inexpediency of holding the Heights of Harlem, with the main body of the Army, on the subject of the " change of our disposition, to couDtcr- " act the operations of the enemy, declining an attack on our front." Had he read that very simple statement, he would have ascertained that the Commander in chief was not aware, on the seveuteeuth of October, that any portion of the .\rmy, at that time, had been " taken from " hence," in the sense of a " retirement of the Army ;" that the " change "of the disposition" of the Army had not, then, been made; that that proposed "change of our disposition" was frankly stated to have been *' determined " on, in the Council of General Officers, on the preceding day ; and that " Gener;il Lee, who arrived on Monday, had strongly "urged the absolute necessity of the measure," not yet executed. I Vide page 410, ante. 'Memoirs of General Healh,''t\. 3 General Orders, '• Uead-quaeters, Hahlem HiiGHTS, October 17, "1776." < Memoirs of General Heath, 74. 5 The action which occurred on the eighteenth of October, the day after that of which we write, was maintained by the Regiments com- manded, respectively, by Colonels Shepard, Read, Baldwin, and Glover, all of them belonging to the Brigade commaud<'d by Colonel Glover, in the absence of General James Clinton. — ( rnic j)ii 417-42^. iiint) setts Militia, from the command of Major-general Lincoln, were " sent up the river," [the Hudson-river,'] " to watch the motions of the ships," [^AePhcenix, the Roebuck, and the Tartar, then lying off Tarrylown,] " and to oppose any landing of men, that they may attempt ® while the Head-quarters of that small Division and, probably, the two remaining Regiments, were posted on Valentine's-hill,' in the Town of Yonkers, one of those ridges which formed, and which still form, a distinguishing feature in the to- pography of Westchester-county ; and, at the time of which we write, the most southerly of those high grounds, extending northerly as far as the White Plains, which were subsequently occupied by detach- ments of the American Army, while the main body of that Army was laboriously and painfully occupied in its famous retreat, with its baggage and stores, from the Heights of Harlem to the high grounds at the last mentioned-place ; * and General Heath's Di- vision was posted in a line extending from Fort In- dependence to Valeutine's-hill.' It is said, also, that » line of entrenched encampments was also formed, along the high grounds, on the western side of the Bronx-river, from Valentine's-hill, on the South, to Chatterton's-hill, opposite the White Plains, on the North ; " but by which of the Regiments they were General Washington to Governor Trumbull, "Heights or Uablzm, "15 October, 1776." " Mewoirs of General Hralh, 73. F 9 Vide pages 415 ; 420, 427 ; 4.30 ; etc., post. 5 The two Regiments of Connecticut encamped on the Harlem-river, belonging to General Parson's Brigade, {General Orders, " Uead-QVAK- " TERS, Harlem Heights, October 15, 177G,") were ordered to pass over the new Bridge and join Colonel Swartwout ; and, with his Regiment, to form a Hank-guard. Of the Brigade commanded by General Paisons, the Regiments conuuanded, respectively, by Colonels Prescott and Hunt- ington were ordered to occupy Fort Independence ; Colonel Ward, with his Regiment, was ordered to Fletcher's, to the eastward of Foit Inde- pendence ; the Regiments commanded, respectively, by Colonels Tyler and Wyllys, were ordered to form a Reserve ; and Captain Treadwell, with a three pounder, and Lieutenant Berbeck, with a howitzer, were attached to the Brigade. Of the Brigade commanded by General Scott, the Regiments commanded, respectively, by Colonels Lasher and Mal- colm were ordered to form a Reserve ;* Colonel Drake, with his Regi- ment, was ordered to occupy the Redoubt, in Bates's cornfield ; Colonel Hardenberg, with his Regiment, was ordered to occui)y the Redoubt, on Cannou-hill ; and Lieutenant Fleming and Fenno, each with a three- pounder, were attached to the Brigade. Of General George Clinton's Brigade, the Regiments commanded, respectively, by Colonels Nicolls and Thomas were ordered to form a Reserve ; Colonel Pawling, with his Regiment, was ordered to occupy Valentine's cornfield, with Colonel Graham and his Regiment on his left ; and Captain Bryant, withatliree- pounder, and Lieutenant Jackson, with a six pounder, were attached to the Brigade. {Division Orders, " KiNo's-BEiroE, October 17, 1776.") 10 General Howe lo Lord George Germainc. " New-York, 30 November "1776 ; " Santhier's Plan of the Operations of the King's Annij under the Command of General Sir William Howe K. B , in New-Yorkand East Xev- Jersey; A Plan of the Countri/ from Frog's Point to Ooton lliver shewing the positions, etc. ; Annual Reqisler for mc> : Hislorij of Europe, *177 ; Gordon's Histnri/ of the American RemliUion, ii., 339 ; Marshall's Life of George Washington, ii., 500 ; etc. Reference may properly be made, in this place, to the two Maps, named among the authorities referred to, in this instance -one of them drawn * There are some reasons for supposing that those two Regiments con- stituted the force left, under Colonel L.isher, for the protection of Fort Independence, when the Division was moved to the White Plains. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 415 constructed and by whom occupied, we are unable to state witb certainty, although we suspect that the Massachusetts Militia, commanded by General Lin- coln, and the two Brigades of General Spencer's Di- vision, commanded, respectively, by Generals Fel- lows and Wadsworth, who had been moved from the Heights of Harlem to Kingsbridge, on the seventeenth of October, were the artificers who constructed and the soldiers who occupied that very greatly important line of hastily constructed earthworks. There had not been much haste displayed in the American Army, in changing its position on the Heights of Harlem, made really strong by the outlay of immense labor, notwithstanding the enemy had completely turned its left flank, occupied a position on its rear, and with the veriest mite of an effort was capable of throwing a strong force across its entire rear, of seizing every line of communication and every strong position, and of forming such a line of offensive operations, covered, on either flank, by the ships off Tarrytown and the fleet off Throgg's-neck, which the Americans, in their generally unknown weakness and poverty of supplies, could scarcely have hoped to overcome. But General Washington had a lingering suspicion that the movement of the enemy to Throgg's-neck was only a feint; that he remained in that unseemly position only to await the proper time when he could quickly embark again, and drop down to Morrisania, on one tide ; and that by Claude Joseph Sauthier, a celebrated Engineer in the service of the King, and published by William Faden, in London, in 1777 ; the other, drnwuby the Engineers of the American Army for, and preserved by, General Washington, and engraved, from tlic original niannscript, for the illustnition of the original edition of Chief-justice Marshall's Life of George Wmhintfion, published in I'hiladelphia, in 18(14. Asboth of these Maps weie originally official, one British and the other American ; asboth were published from the respective manuscripts, as nearly as possible in fac-Hinih- ; and as both are historical autliorities of the highest character, they will be frequently referred to, in our nar- rative of the Military Operations in Westchester-ctmnty ; and, in order that our readers may also enjoy the benefits to bo derived from a use of them, wliilo reading the story of Westchester-county's revolutionary history, the Publishers have rc-produced them, at our reepiest, as nearly in exact ftc-fimitc of the original piiblications, as jwssihle. Sautliier's Map will be found opposite Jtagf* 227 of this work, ante ; and General Washington's Map will be found opposite this page of the same. We may be iwrmitted, however, to call the reader's attention to a sin- gular error which was made in lettering the British Map. Where " Pliil- "Ipsburgh," [I'liilqisboroiigh,] or Yonkers, should have been designated the word " Wepperham " — intended for '"Neperhan," the name of the atream, popularly known as the " Sawmill-river," at the mouth of which Philipshorougb, oi Yonkere, stood — has been erroneously inserte Lord George Germuine, " New-York, 30 November, " 177G." * General George Clinton to Lieulenant-colanel Hamilton^ " Poughkeep- "siE, 28 December, 1777." It is a singular fact that the Major-general referred to in the Note, also inspired the destruction of the White Plains, in which Major Austin also first plundered those whose houses he destroyed. {Testimony of Sergeant Churchill and Tilltij How, on the trial of Major Awtin, as to the robbery, and Major Analiu's Defence before the same Courts as to the original author of the deva«»tAtion.) have already stated,* he has been condemned for hav- ing blundered because he occupied Throgg's-neck in- stead of some more favorable point, on the mainland ; but, MS we have also shown, whatever of censure there may have been due for having thus blundered in occu- pying that isolated Neck, if there was any blunder in the case, it belonged to Admiral Lord Howe instead of to the General, his brother. General Howe has been condemned, also, because of his long stay on Throgg's- neck, without having attempted to move from that position, in any direction whatever,* but surely no one would have desired him to move into an enemy's country, in the face of an active military force of that enemy, without a Commissariat, without the neces- sary military Stores which would become necessary in his conduct of the proposed movement into that ene- my's country, and without the slightest pretense to the necessary means for transporting even his Officers' baggage, of all of which the first and second detach- ments had taken comparatively little to the Neck, and of all of which the subsequent and main supplies I were held back by adverse winds, which prevented the vessels which bore them from passing through Hell-gate.* In addition to the delays in moving the Commissariat, the military Stores, and the Horses and Waggons of the Quarter-master-general's Depart- ment,' to which reference has been made, some delay was also experienced in moving three Battalions of Hessians, from Staten-island, for the reinforcement of the main body, on the Neck ; * and thus, in Gen- eral Howe's own words, " Four or five days had been " unavoidably taken up in landing at Frog's-Neck, " instead of going, at once, to Pell's- point, which " would have been an imprudent measure, as it could * Vide page 407, ante. 5 [Hall's] lliftortj of the Civil War in America, i., 203 ; Stedman's History Hf the Anieriean War, i., 210, 211 ; Gordon's Hiilorij of the American Jiev- olntion, ii., 337 ; Adolphus's Hiitanj of England, Ed. London : 181)5, ii., 379; Sparks' s Lt/e of George Washington, 194; Irving's Life of George Washington, ii., 385 ; etc. 6 General Howe to Lord George Germaine, " New-York, 30 November, " 1776 ;" General Howe's Speech before a Commitiee of the House of Com- mmis, April 29, 1779 ; Annual Register for 1776 ; History of Europe, 170* ; etc. The adverse winds, which prevented the supplies, etc., from passing Hell-gate, were referred to by General Howe in his letter to Lord George Ger- maine, " New-Y'ork, 30 November, 1776 ;" and in those of Lieutenant-colonel Tench Tilghman to William Duer, " Hf.ad-qi arteus, H.kulem Heights, "October 17, 1776;" General Washington to the Q>nlincntal Cotigrcss, "Harlem Heights, October IS, 1776 ; " etc. ' " He transported Carriiiges with him from England ; and whatever "more he wanted were procured on Long Island and Staten Island," (Galloway's Ueplg to the Observations of Lieutenant-general Sir William Howe, 9.) 8 In his despatch to Lord George Germaine, "New- York, 30 Novem- " ber, 1776," General Howe .stated that "three Battalions of Hessians " were drawn from Staten Island ; " but in his Speech before a Committee of the House of Commons, April 29, 1779, when his conduct, as Command- er-in-chief of the King s forces in North America, was under considera- tion, he stated, without contradiction, that the reinforcement consisted of " the Second Division of Hessians." We have preferred the former statement; because there was, then, only one Brigade of Hessians OD Staten Island; and because the "Second Division of Hessians," under General Knyphausen, had not, then, reached America. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 417 " not have been executed without much unnecessary " risk." » Having at length, completely effected his occupa- tion of Throgg's-neck and completely provided for his probable need.s, General Howe determined to open his operations in We=tchester-county, without further delay ; and, at one o'clock in the morning of Friday, the eighteenth of October, the van of the Royal Army, consisting of the Light Infantry and Grena- diers of the British Regiments and a portion, at least, if not all, of the German Chasseurs, was re-embarked, in flat boats, on the western side of the Neck ; and, having passed around the Point of Throgg's-neck, was landed on Pell's, or, as it was sometimes called, Rodman's, neck, on the opposite side of Hutchinson's- river, in the Town of Eastchester.^ The main body of the Army crossed over to the eastern side of the Neck ; and, during the day, that, also, with all its various appointments and stores and supplies, was carried over to Peli's-neck.^ It does not appear that the movement of the van of the Royal Army was seen by the Americans, through the darkness of the very early morning, notwithstanding one of the best of the Brigades in the American service, that of General James Clin- ton, then commanded by Colonel Glover of Marble- head, had been posted, as a guard, in front of Pell's- neck, the place of its debarkation ; and not until daylight had revealed the similar movement of the main body of the Army, was there any suspicion, among the Americans, anywhere, that such a move- ment was imminent — indeed, the van had landed and moved up toward the main-land, a full mile and a half, before either of the movements was discovered.* The movement of the main body, in upwards of two hundred boats, formed into four grand divisions and covered by the smaller armed vessels of the Fleet, was discovered, "early in the morning," by Colonel Glover himself; by whom, after he had sent Major Lee, the Brigade-Major, as an express to Gen- eral Lee, whose Quarters were three miles away from that place, the entire Brigade which he commanded, was called to arms, and moved down the Neck, to oppose the landing of the enemy and to hold him in check, until reinforcements should be sent or other Orders be received. ' General Howe't Speech before a Committee of the House of Oommow, April 29, 1776. ' Admiral Lord Horn to Mr. Siephent, Secretary of the Admiralty '•'ExG^.r., "OFF Xew-York, November 2.3, 1776 ;" General Hotte to Lord George Germaine. " New-York, November 30, 1776, " Lusbington's ii/e 0/ Lord Harrit, 81 ; Gordon's UisUrri/of the American Recolulion, ii., 338. " Admiral Loril Hovceto Mr. Stephens, Secretary of the Admiralty," E.\GLi:, '• OTT New-York, November 23, 1776 ; " Getieral Hotce to Lord George Germaine, "New-York, November 30, 1776;" David How's Diary, October 1«, 1776: [Hall's] History of the Civil War in America, i., 205 ; ilfmioiri of General Heath, 72 ; Gordon's HisUiry of the American Revolu- tion, ii., 338 ; Stedman's History of the American War, i., 211 ; etc. * Extract of a Utter from Mih S/iiarc, [evidently written by General Glo- ver,] dated October 22, 1776, in The Freeman's Journal and Sew Hampshire GaitUe, Yol. I, No. 27, Portsmouth, Tuesday, November 26, 1776. 37 Although the full strength of the Regiments com- manded, respectively, by Colonels Shepard, Read, Baldwin, and Glover — the latter, at that time, com- manded by Captain Curtis — was less than eight hun- dred effective men,* the brave fisherman who tempo- rarily commanded the Brigade pushed forward toward the place where the enemy's Light Infantry and Grenadiers and Chasseurs had landed, and where the main body was about to land, although the rough and broken ground over which the Brigade was moved compelled him to leave, on his route, the three field-pieces which he had taken from his encamp- ment. He had not marched more than half the dis- 'The followins, from the General Reluma of the Army, will serve to show the strength of that little detachment, both before and after the spirited little affair which is now under notice : September 21, 1776. Begiments. Com. Officers. !b , c •3 C . Regiments. i 4^ a V 3. 'Probably between the present villages of Tuckaboe and Scarsdale, near the line of the Harlem Railroad. quietly down, listened to the conversation of the as- sembled countrymen, whom he discovered to be Whigs. From these, Colonel Putnam ascertained that a large body of the Royal Army was lying near New Rochelle, which was about eleven miles distant Irom the White Plains, with good roads and an open, level country between the two places ; and that at the Plains, was a large quantity of American Stores, guarded by only about three hundred Militia. He ascertained, also, that a detachment of the enemy was posted near Mamaroneck, only seven miles dis- tant from the White Plains ; while, on the other side, was the Hudson-river, on which were half a dozen armed vessels of the King's Fleet, within seven miles from the same place; and he understood, at once, that the principal Magazine of Provisions for the American Army, which General Washington had ordered to be brought to the White Plains, for the greater security of it, was enclosed, On three sides, by the King's forces, and was within easy striking distance from either of those three positions. Colonel Putnam waited no longer, at the Tavern, and proceeded no further, on the road towards the White Plains ; but, turning his horse towards the Bronx-river, westward from Ward's Tavern,^ where he then was, over Ward's Bridge, he hastened back to Head-quarters, " with his '■' all-important discoveries." It appears that Colonel Putnam and the Adjutant-general had passed over the same ground, in the morning; and the former was surprised, therefore, when he approached the high ground, westward from the Bronx-river, to see that it was occupied by armed men ; but he ascer- tained with his field-glass that they were Americans ; and when he reached the encampment, he found it was the Brigade commanded by Brigadier-general Lord Stirling, of Major-general Spencer's Division, who had been pushed forward, in advance of the main Army, during that day, to occupy that very im- portant pass and to fortify it.* After Colonel Putnam had refreshed himself and his horse at the Head-quarters of the Brigade — as Lord Stirling was a bon vivant and an extravagant liver, the weary Colonel was, undoubtedly, well-refreshed — he set out for Head-quarters, by way of Yonkers, a road on which he had not previously traveled ; and as it was dark, and because the country over which he was to pass was largely inhabited by those who were un- friendly to the Americans, rendering it hazardous for him to make inquiries, his journey was peculiarly dangerous. It is said, however, that he reached Head-quarters, in safety, about nine o'clock ; that he was received by General Washington, who heard his verbal Report and examined the sketch of the country which he made for the illustration of the Report and 3 The position of that noted Tavern may be ascertained by a reference to the Plan of the Country from Frog^s Point to Croton Jiiver, opposite page 415, ante : if we are correctly informed, the property is now owned and occupied by Hon. Silas D. Gifford, recently County Judge of Westchestei- county. ♦ Vide page 414, ante. 424 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. to show the relative positions of the several bodies of the King's forces and the Magazine, at the White Plains ; that the General was surprised that the Army was so greatly imperiled, "complaining, very feelingly, " of the gentlemen of New York, from whom he had " never been able to obtain a plan of the country, "and saying that it was by their advice he had or- "dered the Stores to the White Plains, as a place of " safety ;" that General Greene and General George Clinton were called in, to vouch for the accuracy of the sketch ; that Colonel Putnam " was charged with " a letter to Brigadier-general Lord Stirling, and " ordered immediately to his Camp, which he reach- " ed, by the same route, about two o'clock ;" that, " before daylight, the Brigade was in motion, in full "march for the White Plains, where it arrived, about "nine o'clock, on the morning of the twenty-first of "October;" and that "thus was the American Army " saved by an interposition of Providence, from a "probably total destruction." While these various movements were in pro- gress, and while his attention to the great events which were passing immediately before him must have been close and constant. General Washington's interest in the future was not neglected. He deter- mined, therefore, to establish a Magazine of Pro- visions, to the northward of the Highlands and " remote from the North River;" and the Quarter- master-general of the Army was instructed to ascer- tain the opinions of William Duer and Robert R. Livingston, on the subject; and, in the mean time, the former of the two, who was never absent when any opportunity for making money was presented, was ordered by the Quartermaster-general to purchase, without the slightest limitation of prices or any check whatever, as to qualitiesor quantities or places or times of delivery, thirty thousand bushels of Grain, one- half of it to be Corn and the other half to be Oats, one thousand tons of Hay, and five hundred tons of Rye- straw — as Robert R. Livingston was to be consulted concerning the places where all these should be deliv- ered, it is very clear that the Quartermaster general intended that large liberty, in the expenditure of the public monies, which he had authorized, should be ex- ercised within the Manor of Livingston, where that family and its adherents would enjoy the benefits to be derived from that questionable source, instead of ex- pending those monies within those other portions of the State where the dominant party possessed no in- terest, although the former was perfectly secure from loss and the latter, very largely , were exposed to the inroads of the enemy. Instructions were also given, also without limitation, for the purchase of Horses and Oxen ; and if they could not be purchased, the lucky agent was authorized to hire them, " at the most rea- "sonable rates." ' It was for the purpose of making 1 Qii irtermaaler-gctieral Mijliii to Willuim Duer, "Mount Washington, " October 20, 1776." such opportunities as these, that the dominant faction had revolted; and in such bauds as those of William Duer and the Livingstons, such opportunities never failed to be made useful, always to themselves and sometimes to the State and the Country. There was ample reason, however, for the anxiety of General Washington, concerning Provisions for the supply of the Army, since, at the time when he ordered the establishment of a Magazine, in the up- per part of Duchess-county, there were not more than fifteen hundred barrels of Flour and two hundred barrels of Pork, at Kingsbridge and on the Heights of Harlem; and there were very few live Cattle, of any kind, collected, at any place within the neighbor- hood of t he Army. As the enemy had the control of the navigation on the Hudson-river, as well as of that on the Sound, there could not be any transportation of the much-needed supplies, by water; and the great scarcity of teams, growing more and more evident, day by day, rendered the prospect of a transportation, by land-carriage, of what would become necessary for the maintenance of the Army, exceedingly discouraging, especially since the enemy had indicated his intention to cut oft" the lines of communication by land, as well as those by water. The General was necessarily led, therefore, to concentrate whatever of supplier he had, at the White Plains ; to request and entreat that ev- ery possible exertion should be made to have large quantities of Provisions carried to the interior parts of the country, out of the reach of the enemy, and with the utmost expedition ; and to inform the Com- missary-general of the Army that a failure to effect these would, he feared, he was certain, be productive of the fatal consequences attending on mutiny and plunder, adding, significantly, " indeed, the latter " will be authorized by necessity." With such testimony as this, and there is an abun- dance of other testimony which is even stronger in its terms, the honest historian of these events finds great difficulty in reconciling the facts with the per- sistent assertion that the AVar of the Revolution was originated by the great body of the Colonists arising, en masse, for the protection of their several prop- erties and homes and families from outrages threat- ened or inflicted by a foreign tyrant ; that it was con- ducted by that same great body of people, through agencies of its own appointment and under its con- trol, always unselfishly and with nothing else than the common weal in view ; and that the willing hands and the patriotic hearts of the entire body of the peo- ple were in accord with the patriotism of the Army which it had created, which it was sustaining with all which it possessed, and on which, alone, all its hopes for security, for happiness, for prosperity, and for peace, were rested. Surely, where mutiny and plundering were oflicially threatened in default of 2 General Washington to Colonel Joseph Trumbull, Commissary general oj Provmons, " Head-qua RTf'HS, King's Bridge, October 20, 1776." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 425 contributions, forced contributions, demanded and expected, tliere could not liave been much sympathy between the Army and the body of the people ; and, surely, in that condition of the popular feeling, the Army can scarcely be said, in truth, to have been fighting for the cause of the country, at large, but, on the contrary, as Armies have always fought, at the expense of the body of the people, of the working-bees of the hive, for the promotion, only, of the private ends and the private aims and the private interests of an individual or of a family or of a faction or of a party, neither of them a producer nor anything else than a cumbrance and a burden on those who have labored. It will be seen, from General Washington's anxiety concerning his supplies and concerning the lines of communication between the Army and the country, and from other evidence, that he was becoming con- vinced that the enemy intended to take NewRochelle for the base of his proposed operations, and, from that place, hy way of the White Plains, to form his com- mand, in a line, to the Hudson-river,' at Tarrytown — a plan of operations, as we have already stated,- which was formed, after due consideration, before General Howe had left the City of New York, as will have been seen in the disposition of the Phoenix, the Roebuck, and the Tartar, oft' Tarrytown, to cover the objective point, the right of the proposed new line, of the Army,^ and in the selection of Mill's-creek, or New Rochelle-harbor, as the base of his opera- tions, the left of the proposed line,* and, because of that new-born conviction, as early as noon, on the 'See, also, General WatUington, thromjh his Secretary, to the Presidmt of Ihe Coiitiuentiil Cotujress, "KiNu"s BiiiuuE, October20, 177(i, lialf-afterone " o'clock, P. M." • Vide i)age 231, ante. 3 Vide page 229, 230, ante. We are not insensible that Bancroft, {llUtory of ttic Vitited Statrs, origi- nal edition, ix. 177 ; centenary edition, 1876, v., 441,) said it was as early as his fifth day on Throgg's-ncck, that General Howe " gave up the hope of '* getting directly in Washington's rear ; and that, in consequence of that disappointment and at that time, " he resolved to strike at AVhite '•Plains." Little credit is given to General Howe and the very able Officers whom he commanded, by any cue who can really suppose they would open a Campaign, or even a series of important movements, without having, previously, formed a plan, as carefully and as intelligently con- structed as possible, for the general guidance of the oiierations of the Army ; and if from nothing else, the selection of Tarrytown and New Rochelle-harbor, as the two extremes of the proposed line, while the Army was yet unknown on Throgg's-neck, might have indicated to a less ex- perienced reader than the venerable ex-Secretary of War, that the pro- posed lino from New Rochelle, by way of the White Plains, to Tarry- town, was vastly more, in the milit.-iry operations of the Royal .\rmy, than a sudden inspiration which sprung up to cheer the disappointed General, when, on the sixteenth of October, the latter is alleged to have given up all hope of getting in the rear of the Americans — the whole of it a finely constructed creation of the venerable historian's peculiarly lively and poetical imagination. There is an abundance of testimony showing that General Howe's original purpose was to take Tarrytown and New Rochelle, as the extremes of his proposed lines ; and, because the venerable historian did not ap- pe»r to have been governed by it, preferring, rather, to pay deference to Ik phantom of his own creation, it must have been that he did not under- stand it. Whatever it may have been which inspired the historian, however, what he wrote, on the subject under notice, is not historical, although it bears the name of History. * Vide page 231, note 7, ante. 38 twentieth of October, the entire military force, except the Regiments which were intended to garrison Fort Washington, was drawn into Westchester-couuty ; ev- ery height and pass and advantageous ground, be- tween New Rochelle and the Hudson-river, was occu- pied by an American force suflBciently strong to hold it, temporarily f the Head-quarters of the Army were removed from Harlem Heights to Kingsbridge;" and, although there are no direct testimonies on the sub- ject, it is very evident that, at least as early as the close of the twentieth of October, the proper disposi- tions for the movement of the main body of the Army — the garrison of Fort Washington and a guard at the barracks, at Fort Independence, only excepted — to the high grounds, to the northward and eastward of the White Plains, had, also, been entirely completed. On the twentieth of October, Lieutenant-colonel Harcourt, with the greater portion of the Sixteenth Regiment of Light Dragoons — the other portion of the Regiment having embarked on a transport which had not come into port — and the whole of the Seven- teenth Regiment of Light Dragoons, joined General Howe ; and, on the next day, {^October 21, 1776,] thus strengthened, the Right and Center of the Royal Ar- my were moved to a position, about two miles to the northward of New Rochelle, on the road to the White Plains, Lieutenant-general Heister occupying the ground which had been thus abandoned, with one Brigade of British and two Brigades of Hessians, constituting the Left of the Army and, early in the morning of that day, the Queen's Rangers, a Corps of Loyalists commanded by Lieutenant-colonel Rogers, were detached and pushed forward, to take possession of Mamaroneck,* the last-named of which places was 6 General Washington, through his Secretary, to the Congress, " Kino's " Bridije, 0ctober20, 1770, half-after one o'clock, P.M." 6 Sparks, {Writings of George Washington, iv., 152, note,) said, " TleaJ- " quarters remained at Haerlem Heights, as appears by the Orderly Book, " till the twenty -first ; " and the Orderly Book of both the twentieth and the twenty-first of October gives weight to his statement. But, because the entire military force, except the garrison of Fort Washington, had been moved into Westchester-county as early as noon, on the twentieth ; because General Greene had found Head- quarters, " near King's Bridge," on the evening of the nineteenth, {Letter to the Continental O^igress, "Camp at Fout Lk.e, (lately Fort Constitution,) October 20, 1776;") because Lieutenant-colonel Tench Tilghman, one of the General's Aids, had addressed a letter to William Duer, dated " HEAn-QUARTERS, Kinm River; Dawson's MiUturij Retreats through ]yestcheMer-county , in 177G, 35-37 ; etc. We are not insensible of the fact that, in tliis instance, the greater number of those who have preceded us, in writing of that military re- treat of the .\mcricans, have maintained that those defensive works were thrown up by the retreating Army, ou its march to the White Plains, instead of by detachments moved forward, for that specific purpose, be- fore the retreat of the main body, from Kingsbridge, had been fully de- termined on. Among tliose from whom we have thus dissented, are the despatch of General Howe to Lord Geoi'ge Germaine, " New-York, "30 November, 177C ; " Annual Register forlTid: History of Europe, *177'; History of the War in America, Dublin: 1779, i., 194 ; [Hall's] History of the Civil War in America, i., 207 ; Gordon's History of the American Revo- lution, ii., 1539; Stedman's History of the Ameriean War, i., 212; Mar- shall's ii/eo/ George Washington, ii., 500 ; Andrews's /f(«(ory of the War, ii., 244; Murray's Impartial History of the War in America, ii., 177 ; Ramsay's History of Out American Revolution, i., 309 ; Morse's Annals of the American Revolution, 2Ij3 ; Sparks's Life of George Washington, 195; Irving's Life of George Washington, ii., 384, 385 ; Hamilton's History of the Republic, i., 130; Lossing's Pictorial Field-book of the American Revolu- tion, ii., 821 ; Carrington's Battles of the American Revolution, 236, etc.; but we have preferred the testimony of Division Orders for the move- ment of the troops, the narrative of tlie movement which was written by the Major-general commanding the Division, the official Maps of the movement drawn by both the .\merican and the Royal Engineers, and our own well-settled convictions of the improliability that the main Army had been employed in throwing up entrenchments or that its laborious retreat to the Plains was made more laliorious by continuous halts for the purpose of throwing up earthworks, for any purpose. When the retreat was originally determined on, the necessity for a prompt and immediate occupation of the new-selected |>osition was too evident to admit of any such halts, for any such purposes ; and, in the great scarcity of Teams for the removal of the Stores and Baggage and Artil- lery, which required the men to take the places of beasts of burden, in dragging and carrying what needed to be transportcil, the main bofly of the .\miy needed no additional labor, nor is it in the slightest degree probable that any such additional labor was really imposed on it. 428 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. position which had been appointed for it, on the ex- treme left of the proposed line of the Army, its left resting on a "deep hollow, through which ran a small " brook,^ which came from a mill-pond,^ a little above."' On the eastern, or opposite side, of that "deep hol- " low," " there was a very commanding ground," from which the Division could have been enfiladed;* and the ground occupied by the Division, descended, gradually, from the extreme left to the right of the line.* On the high ground, on the opposite side of the "deep hollow," General Heath posted the Regiment of New York troops commauded by Colonel William Malcolm, and Lieutenant Fenno of the Artillery, the latter with a field -piece, with instructions to occupy a position in the skirt of the wood which covered the upper portion of the high ground, " at the South brow " of the hill and there, that covering party remained, until the American Army retreated into the high grounds of Northcastle.^ While the Division commanded by General Heath was thus hurrying, by a forced march, towards the White Plains, during the night of the twenty-first of October, another portion of the American Army was engaged in a brilliant dash on the enemy's outpost, at Mamaroneck. It will be remembered that, on the twenty-first of October, when the Right and Center of the main body of the Royal Army were moved forward to a position between New Rochelle and the White Plains, the Queen's Rangers, a select body of Loy- alists, commanded by the celebrated partisan, Lieu- tenant-colonel Robert Rogers,' were pushed forward 1 Then and now known as the Slamaroneck-river. 2 Then known as " Horton'e pond : " now known as "St. Mary's " Lake." 3 The entire property included in this portion of our narrative, is now owned by Cliarles Deutermann, Esq. * Now forming a portion of what is known as " The Underliill " Farm." 5 Tliis description of the ground occui>ied by tlie Division commanded by General Ileath, has been taken, largely in his own words, from his Memoirn^ evidently written by himself, page 75. For our statements concerning the present names and owners uf the several properties re- ferred to, we are indebted to the Hon. J. O. Dykman, Judge of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, and a resident of the White Plains. 6 Memoirs oj General Heath, 75. ' The Queen's Bangers, subsequently so widely known, had been raised in Connet-ticut and the vicinity of New York, for the duties which their name implied ; and, at the time of which we write, they were com- manded by Lieutenant-colonel Hubert Rogers, who had so much distin- guished himself as a partisan, on the frontiei*s, during the War with France. They were "all Americans, and all Loyalists." — (Shucoe's Journal of the Operaliiim of the Qwm''s litnigers, 18.) These Rangers were said, by the biographer of their distinguished Com- mandant, of a later period, to have been "disciplined, not for parade, but " for active service. They were never to march in slow time ; were directed "to fire with precision and steadiness; to wield the bayonet with force "and effect; to disperse and rally with rapidity. In short, in the in- " structions for the management of the Corps, its conmiander seems to " have anticipated the more modern tactics of the French Armj*." — i^Memoir of Lieutenant coloiwl Sinicoe, — Simcoe's Journal of the Operations of the Queen's Bangers, viii.) to Mamaroneck, which they had occupied early in the morning of that day." It will be remembered, also, that while General Washington was at the White Plains, on the twenty- first of October, he had received information of that occupation of Mamaroneck ; and that he had deter- ined to make an attack on the Queen's Rangers who were posted there.' In accordance with that deter- mination and with Orders which were undoubtedly is- sued by General Washington,'" General Lord Stirling, who had reached the White Plains, with his com- mand, during the morning of that day, detached Major Green, with one hundred and fifty men from the First and Third Virginia Regiments, and Colonel John Haslet, with six hundred men from his own — the Delaware — and other Regiments, with orders to fall on the Rangers, during the coming night. The movement was made with good judgment and ability; the Rangers were entirely surprised, through the carelessness of their sentries ; and, as was stated by an Officer in the Royal Army," they were "very roughly " handled." In consequence of the bad conduct of the guides whom Colonel Haslet had employed,'^ how- ever, the success was not as complete as it probably would have been, had the guides done their duty properly. As it was. Colonel Haslet and his gallant command handled the Rangers " very roughly," kill- ing and wounding a considerable number ; " carrying back, to the White Plains, thirty-six prisoners," and 8 General Washington to Cohniel Lachtan Mcintosh, of Georgia, WiiiTE- " Plains, October 21, 1776;" the same to Major Zabdiel Rogers, "White-Plains, October 21, 1776 ;" Extract of a letter from a General Officer, datt'd "MovnT Washington, October 23, 1776 ;" General Roue to Lord George Germniiie, " New-York, 30 November, 1776 ;" [Hall's] Hislori; of the Civil War in America, i., 205 ; Stedman's History of the American War, i., 212 ; Gordon's History of the American Iterolution, ii., 339 ; Sauthier's Plan of the Operations uf the King's Army ; Plan of the Covntry from Frog's Point to Oroton River; etc. ^ Vide page 250, ante. '0 In Lieutenant-colonel Tilghnian's letter to his father, dated " Vai- " entine's-Hill 4 MILES FROM KiNGSBRiDGE 22 October 1776," it is ex- ^ pressly stated that "the General " — by which term he referred to Gen- eral Washington, whose Aide-de-Camp he wiis and with whom he had been, while the Commander-in-Chief was at the White Plains — " detached "Major Green * * » to fall upon Sogers in the Night, which they " did," etc. 11 [Hall's] History of the Civil War in A7nerica, i., 205. 12 Lieutenant-colonel Tilghman, in the letter to his father, to which we have already referred, stated that " had not the Guides posted Haslet "wrong the whole party consisting of 400 must have fallen into our "Hands ;" and Colonel Haslet, in his Letter to General CiEsar Rodney, dated " October 28, 1776," said, " had not our guides deserted us on the "first outset, he and his whole party must have been taken." See, also. General Washintjtun, through his Secretary, to Governor Trum- bull, "Camp on Valentine's-Hill, October 22, 1776." 13 In Lieutenant-colonel Tilghnian's letter to his father, already men- tioned, it is said "they counted 2.5 killed in one Orchard, how many got " oft" wounded we dont know ;" and in Colonel Haslet's letter to General Rodney, already referred to, it was said, "his Lieutenant and a number " of others were left dead on the spot." ^* Lieutenant-colonel Tilghmanfo his father, "Valentine's-Hill 4 miles "from Kingsbridge, 22 October, 1776;" Coloyiel Haslett to General Rod- ney, " White-Plains, October 28, 1776 ;" etc. A list of thirty-one of those prisoners may be seen in Force's American Archives, V., ii., 1203 ; but the evident slaughter of the names has made that record useless to every one who is unacquainted with the names of THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 429 including, among the trophies of their bravery, " a ^'pair of Colors, sixty stund of Arms, and a variety of "plunder,"' among the latter of which were "a good •"many Blankets."^ On the side of the Americans, "three or four were left, dead, and. about fifteen were " wounded, among the latter, Major Green, of the "Second Virginia Regiment, wounded in the shoul- " der, and Captain Pope, who acted as Major, and "behaved with great bravery, wounded in the leg.'" •General Lord Stirling is said to have been "so highly " pleased with the success of the expedition, that he " thanked Colonel Haslet and his command, pub- " Holy, on the parade." * families of whom they were probably membere. As many of them appear *o have been of W'estchester-county origin, we append the list, corrected A3 far as we have been able to correct it : *Joseph Dean, ♦Jonathan Austin, *Stephen Law, Francis Baslcy, ♦Ulijah Carle, James Sharp, ♦John Angevine, Solomon Parent, ♦Joseph Carle, .lonathau Eddy, Walter Brown, *Stephen Travis, Gilbert Myers, ♦James Cannady,t ♦Frederic Bevoe, ♦Moses Travis, David Lawrence, Abraham Brown, ♦James Angevine, ♦Elnathan Appleby, John Charlick, Jedediah Davis, Jeremiah Wood, * Jacob Cadwell Burr, Reuben Stivers, James Jleleon, [*-Nelson f] ♦David Travis, Noah Brown, John Worden, AVilliam VVaahburn. ♦Elijah Bartow, 1 Colonel Hatlet foGeneral Rodney, " White-Plains, October 28, 1776." ^ LieuteiuitU-colonel Tilghman to his father, " A'alentine's-Hill, 4 miles *'rR0M Kingsbridge, 22 October, 1776." ' Colonel Haslet to General Rodney, "'Wiiite-Plains, October 28, 1776." < Those who shall desire to learn more of this affair are referred to general Washington 6 letter to Governor Tnimbiill, "Camp on Valen- " TINE's-HiLL, October 22, 1776 ; " the same, tu the Continental Congress, *' Head-qvarters, White-Plains, 25 October, 1776;" Extract of a letter from Fort Lee, dated " October 22," in The Philadelphia Evening Post, Vol. II., No. 276, "Philadelphia, .Saturday, October 26, 1776;" Extract of a letter from a General Officer, dated " Mount Washingtoni ■"October 23, 1776," iu The Pennsylvania Jounuxl, No. 1769, "Philadel. " PllIA, Wednesday, October :!0, 1776," and in Force's Amei-ican Archives, •T., ii., 1203 ; /16ram Clark to Colonel Dayton, " Eliza bethtown, October "26, 1776;" Extract from a letter published by the Continental Congress, in The Pennsylvania Journal, No. 1770, "Philadelphia, Wednesday, "November 6,1776;" General Howe to Lord George Germaine, " New- " York, 30 November, 1776 ;" [Hall's] History of the Civil War in America, I., 205 ; (ionion's History of the American Revolution, ii., 339 ; Memoirs of General H»ilh, 74, 75 ; etc. Bolton, in his history of Westchester-counly, (original edition, i., 311 ; second edition, i., 499) prefi.xed to General Heath's mention of this affair (except the date, which the latter had correctly stated,) the singular in- formation that it occurred on " the day previous to the battle at White " Plains," [Oc(o6ct- 27,] and that the command of the Americans was held by Colonel Smallwood, of the Maryland Line of the Continental Army. Bancroft, in his History uf the I'nilt d Slates, (original edition, ix., 178 ; centenary edition, v. 442,) regarded the Rangers as only "a picket of "Rogers's Regiment of R3"The Rebel Army are in so wretched a condition, as to Clothing and "Accoutrements, that I believe no Nation ever saw such a set of tatterde- " malions. There are few Coats among them b\it what are out at " elbows ; and in a whole Regiment there is scarce a pair of Breeches. " Judge, then, how flicy must be pinched by a Winter Campaign." — {Let- ter from an Offlcr of the Sixty-fourth Regiment to his friend in London, "New-York, October 30, 1776," re-printed in Force's American Archives, v., ii., 1293, 1294.) " We are requested by the Generals of our State to inform you of the "absolute necessity our troops are in for want of Clothing." — {Charles D. Witt, Robert Harper, and Lewis Graham to the President of the Xew York Convention, " White Plains, October 24, 1776.") " The Colonel and Major Barber came here, last evening; and the "Regiment is now within a few miles of this place, marching with " cheerfulness ; but great part of the men ['""<>] barefooted and bare- legged." {Richard Stockton to Abram Clark, " Saratoga, October 28 "1776.") " Vide pages 223, 224, ante. 434 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the term of service of very many of them had nearly expii-ed ; ' and, very largely, that short term was made very much shorter by shameful desertions.' There was no harmony of sentiment, no common feeling of patriotism, no sympathy with each other as fellow- countrymen engaged in a common cause, in any por- tion of the Army. The Eastern troops were stigma- tized as, generally, nothing else than a mass of speculating poltroons, for which, very often, there was abundant reason ; ' and they, reciprocated the ill- feeling of those from the Middle and Southern States, by branding them as " Aristocrats " and " Mac- caronis "—the former of the two sobriquets in allusion to the distinctions of rank which were maintained among those troops, so different from the practice of the New Englanders ; the latter, in contemptuous reference to the Regiments, from the Middle and Southern States, who were uniformed, well-equipped. ^ Many of the troops were enlisted to serve only until the fii^st of December ; and the temis of service of the greater portion of the re- mainder would expire on the last day of December, ensuing. — {General WaeliingUm to the President of the Congress, '• HE.\i>-Qr.\nT£HS, AT Colo-NEL "MoHRis's House, 18 September, 1770;" etc.) 2 General Washinglon to the Qtficers and Soldiers of the rennsylvania As- sociation, " Heai>-«u.\rters, Xew-Yoek, 8 August, 1776; " Wie ««me (o the President of the Congress, " New- York, 2 September, 177G ; "' General Schuyler to Genend Gules, "Saratoga, October ;!0, 177G ;"' etc. 3 The following is a specimen of a multitude of such testimonials of the speculative propensities of the New England troops, in the Army of the Revolution, and of their too frequent dishonesty in their oper- ations, which are accessible to every one. Every careful student can com- mand many such evidences ; but this, written by the Conmiissary-gen- eral of Provisions of the Continental Army, himself a Connecticut- man, to his father, Jonathan Trumbull, who was, then, the Governor of Connecticut, will be sufficient, for the purposes under consideration. " Nobth-Castle, 4th December, 1776. " Honoured Sir : " Enclosed I send you Returns of some of the Regiments of Con- "necticut Militia under counnand of Major General Wooster, such as " I can get ; though I have called and called again and again for them, " I believe there are but one of them really true, that is Major Brins- made's, who seems to be the honestest man. The fact is, they can't *'make their AVeekly and Provision Returns agree; for this reason, " they have made a number of Brevet Officers. They doubt whether "these Officers will be allowed extra rations: to avoid that, they re- " turn so many more men as to cover the extra rations of those Otli- " cers. You'll see by adverting to the Returns, that some Companies "have more Officers than Privates, at best ; but not content with that, " and instead of sending home the Officers who have very few men, " almost none, and turning over those few men into other Companies, " they add Brevet Officei-s, not only to pick the pockets of the pub- " lick, here, but, also, those Brevet Officers are to be dismissed from "the Militia Rolls, at home ; and, in a few times more being called "forth, there will be no Slilitia left in the State. " These things I thought it my duty to report to you, as the char- "acter of the State is at stake; and how the Officers who have done " these things w ill get along, here, I don't know, as we now make " Weekly Ration Returns as well as Returns of the Army, by which " they must be discovered. The consequence is bad to the Officers ; how- " ever, they must take their fate. " I am sorry to have the character of the State suffer liy such conduct " of its Officers. ********* " I am, honoured Sir, your dutiful Son, '•Jos. Trumbull. " Governour Trumbull." We have seen no evidence that either General Wooster or Conmiis- sary-geueral Trumbull took any steps for either the arrest of the of- fenders or a suppression of the offences. and properly disciplined * — adding fuel to the flame of discord, which, on more than oue occasion, required all the good judgment and determination of which the Commander-in-chief was master, to prevent a serious outbreak.^ It will be remembered that, on Monday, the twenty- first of October, the Right and Centre of the Royal Army were moved to a position, on the road leading to the White Plains, about two miles to the northward of New Rochelle ; and that Lieutenant-general Heis- ter, with the Left of the Army, consisting of one Brigade of British and two Brigades of Hessian troops, moved forward aud occupied the position which had beeu thus abandoned.^ It will be remembered, also, that, on the same day. Lieutenant-colonel Rogers, with the Corps of Loyalists known as " The Queen's " Rangers," was detached from the main body of the Army, and pushed forward to take possession of Mamar- oneck,' where, on the following night, he and his command "were roughly handled," by a party of Americans who had been despatched from the AVhite Plains, for that purpose ; * which led General Howe, on the following day, [Tuesday, October 22,] to move the Sixth Brigade of British troops, commanded by Brigadier-general Agnew, to sustain that important post." It will be remembered, also, that, on Sunday, the twentieth of October, the Royal Army was strengthened by the addition of a portion of the Six- teenth and the whole of the Seventeenth Regiments of Light Dragoons, the former commanded by Lieu- tenant-colonel Harcourt, an Officer of great merit;'" and that, ou Tuesday, the twenty -second of October, it was further strengthened by the arrival, at New Rochelle, of Lieutenant-general Knyphausen, with the Second Division of Hessians aud the Regiment of Waldeckers." Taking counsel of his experience. General Howe ordered Lieutenant-general Heister, with the Left of the Army, to join in the movement ; and, on Thursday, the twenty-fourth, and on Friday, the twenty-fiftb, of October, the main body of the Royal Army was moved from the positions on which it had rested, for several days, towards Scarsdale.'- It moved in two •1 Reed s Life of Joseph Heed, i., 2.39-24-2 ; Gordon's History of the Amer- ican Beiotution, ii., 304, 317, 324, 331, 333-335 ; Marshall's Life of George Washington, ii., 473,474 ; etc. ' General Orders, " New- York August 1, 1776 ; " Gordon's History of the American Pevolution, ii., 304; etc. 6 Vide page 2i'J, ante. See, also. General Howe to Lord George Germnine, " New-York, 30th "November, 1776;'' [Hall's] History of the CiiU War in America, i., 205 ; etc. ' Vide page 249, ante. 8 Vide pages '252, 253, ante. 8 Vide page 253, ante. 1* Vide page 249, ante. 11 Vide pnge 253, ante. 12 Information was received, at the White Plains, as early as two o'clock on Thursday afternoon, [Ortober2i,] that the Royal Army had struck its tents, on its position near New Roclielle, "early this murnirjg ;" and that it was, then, "advancing from that to this place, along the common "road."— (Ge/ierai George Clinton to John 3[cKesson, Secretary to theSeio- York ConveiUion, " White-PlaI.ns, October 24, 2 P. M., 1776.") THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 435 columns, with great caution ; ' and, on the twenty-fifth of October, when the heads of the columns reached Scarsdale, after their two dajs' march, they were halted; and the Army encamped in a line which was parallel with the Bronx-river and with the line of march, on the opposite side of that little stream, on which General Lee, with his heavily laden column) was transporting the Baggage and Stores of the Amer- ican Army, to the White Plains- — in many places, the two were not more than a mile distant from each other ; and, in one place, if not in others, the toiling Americans were directly within sight of their powerful enemy. The object of General Howe, in halting at Scars- dale, with his Eight within four miles of the Ameri- can lines, at the White Plains, and of remaining en- camped at that place, without making a movement, of any kind, during nearly three days, was not under- stood by those, in Europe, who were inclined to con- demn his conduct, as Commander-in-chief of the Army, before the Parliament and the country ; and the evidently studied silence, on that subject, which the General maintained, was not calculated to quiet, nor even to lessen, the fault-findings of those who were his political and personal enemies. But, what- In his letter totbe President of the Pongress, dated " Head-qt arters, " White- Plains, 25 October, 1776," Colonel Robert H. Harrison, General Washington's Secretary, stated that "about two o'clock this afternoon, " intelligence was brought to Head-quarters, that three or four detach- "mentsof the enemy were on their mHrch, and had advanced within "about four miles of this place. It has been fully confirmed, since, by "a variety of persons, who have been out to reconnoitre." If General Clinton did not make a mistake in the date of his letter, of which we have no evidence, the movement of the Royal .\rmy was com- menced ou Thursday, [Oftofce/- 24 ;] and the letter of Colonel Harrison clearly indicated that it had already reached Scai-sdale, within four miles of the Plains, before the movement was known at Head quarters, at two o'clock in the afternoon of the following day, [Friday, CJclobi r 25.] The failure of General Washington to obtain information of the move- ments of the King's troops, of which so many instances have been seen, was nowhere more evident than in the instance now under considera- tion- «ne of the reasonable results of the outrages to which the inhabit- ants had been subjected, by both the Congresses and*the Committees, on the one hand, and by the unrestrained thieves, among both the Officers and the Privates of the Army whom General Washington commanded, oa the other. - " General Howe thought it necessary to jiroceed with great circum- "epection. The progress was slow ; the march of the Arm}', close; the "encampments, compact and well-guarded with artillery ; and the most "soldier-like caution used, in every respect." — (Anuual Register Jor 1776; History of Europe, *177.) "The British continued moving up, but with great caution, theirrear "scarcely advancing, when they came to encamp again, much further "than where the advance had moved from.'' — {Memoirs of Major-gen- tral Heath, 76.) "The caution of the English General was increased by the evidences "of enterprise in his adversary. His object seems to have been to avoid "skirmishing, and to bring on a general action, if that could be effected "under favorable circumstances ; if not, he knew well the approaching "diwolution of the American Army, and calculated, not without reason, " to derive from that event nearly all the advantages of a victory. He "proceeded, therefore, slowly. His marches were in close order; his " encampments compact, and well guarded with artillery ; and the ut- " most circumspection was used, not to expose any part which might be "vulnerable."— (Marshall's Lifeof George Washington, ii., 501.) S G<->iiT(i; Hoicrto Lord George Germaine, " Xew-York, 30 Xovcniber, "1776 ;" Sauthier's PJan i)/(Ae 0;)e)ii General Howe lo Lord George Gennaine, " New-York, 30 November, " 1776 ; " [Hall's] IFislory of the CioU War in America, i., 207 ; Stedman's History of the Ami-rican War, i.,212 ; Marshall's Life of George Wathing- ton, ii., 503 ; etc. ^Extract of a letter from a Gentleman in the Army, dated "Camp near "the Mill.*!, about three miles North of Wmite-Pi.ains, November "1, 1776," re-printed in Force's American Archives, "V. iii., 473, 474. We have learned from the Iteturns of the Killed, Wounded, and Missing, on that day, of Regiments who are known to have taken no part what- ever in the subseiiuent action on Chatterton's-hill, of what Keginients that force who met tlie King's troops, near Hart's-corners, was com- posed: it contained the llegiments commanded by Colonels Silliman, Selden, Sage, and Douglass— the latter commanded by Dieutenant-colo- nel Arnold — all of them of the Brigade commanded by General Wads- worth ; the Kegimeut commanded by Colonel Chester, of the Brigade commanded by Colonel Sargent ; the Regiments commanded by Colonels Baldwin, Douglass, an.") See, also. Lieutenant coluiul Tilghmun /iis /«(/« >•," Wiiite-Plaixs, 31 "October, 177C.'" ' Colonel Hlonet Robert H. Harrison to Gorenmr Tniuibii/I, "White-Plains, November 2, 1776;" OiUmel Haslet to Gen- tral Ciesur Kodnei/, " November 12, 177G" ; etc. ' Coloitel Hunle.t to General Ciexar Bodneii, " November 12, 1776." 'Colonel Hatlet to General Cee$ar Rodney, "November 12, 1776;" Captiiiii Hull's unpublished Memoir of hie ReroliUionnry Serricef, quoted in CampbeH's Reroluliouary Serrici-t and Oicil Life of General William Hull, by his daughter, 54, 55 ; etc. < Colonel Carrington, {Rattles of the Ameiican Revolution, 240,) was at «ome pains to introduce Colonel Mon-is Graham, of the New York Mili- tia, and to place his name where it would appear among those of Colo- nels commanding Regiments who had occupieil and defended ChattertoD's- Company of New-York Artillery, with two small field-pieces, commanded by Captain Alexander Ham- ilton and forming a portion of the Brigade com- manded by General McDougal, was, also, present ; but history has not recorded the name of the Officer who, then, commanded it.^ The cannonade of the little party, on Chatterton's- hill,- was continued by the Hessian Artillerists, with- out cessation, while the General Officers, it is said," assembled in Council, without having dismounted ; and it is probable that the noisy demonstration, so very characteristic of Germans, in their use of gun- jiowdcr, was continued, with unabated ardor, until the movement of their companions in arms, up the steep and rugged hill-side, of which the reader will learn more, hereafter, obliged the gunners to suspend their operations." "Upon viewing the situation," in deference to the hill ; but no other writer than he has thus honored Colonel Graham, himself unworthy of any such authorial favor; and, besides. Colonel Carrington coulil have easily ascertained that Colonel Graham's com- inanil was a portion of tile Brigade coniinanded by General George Clin- ton, who was posted on the extreme left of the American line, not far from two miles from Chatterton's-hill. No one has pretended that the Aclj\itant-geneval of the Army was on Chatterton's-hill, on that eventful Jlonday ; but he must have been there, if Colonel Carrington is correct, since it was he who accused Colonel Graliam of cowardice, on which Colonel Carrington has based his favor to the bashful New-Yorker. 6 It is a notable fact that, notwithstanding all which has been written, in these latter days, of tlie great services of that Company, of which con- temporai-y writers were entirely silent, the name of the Ofticer who waa in actual comnuiud, on Chatterton's-hill, was not mentioned by any one, of that period, who wrote concerning the Battle. There is a tradition that, a short time before the date under considera- tion. Captain Hamilton was in the City of New-York, then in possession of the King's Army ; and there is, certainly, written evidence, over hie own signature, that he was in the same City, on the sixth of November, eight days after the Battle : it is possible, therefore, that, because the command was not in the official commander, on the occasion under con- sideration, the name of the actual commander was not regarded as worthy of being recorded. 8 "I saw their General Officers, on horseback, as.semble in Council." — {Colonel Haslet to Geiural Cmar Rodtieij, "November 12, 1776.") ' There is, evidently, considerable exaggeration in what was written of that cannonade, by " a Gentleman in the Army," in his letter, already resorted to, dated "Camp near the Mills, about three miles North " OF THE White Plains, November 1, 1776 ; " but we make room for it. " The scene was grand and solemn ; all the adjacent hills smoked, as "though on fire, and bellowed and trembled with a perpetual cannonade " and fire of field-pieces, liowitz, and mortars. The air groaned "with streams of cannon and musket-shot ; the air and hills smoked and " echoed, terribly, with the bursting of shells ; the fences and walls were " knocked down, and torn to pieces ; and men's legs, arms, and bodiea "mingled with cannon and grape-shot, all round us. I was in the ac- " tion, and under as good avriters, led and, probably, inspired by the unscrupulous John C. Hamilton, {History of the Republic of the United Stales, i., 133,) who said the Hessian forlorn-hope "refused to wade the tangled stream ; and a temporai-y bridge was begun" and, finally, completed, — of which bridge, he related several incidents. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 441 order in which we iiave uanied them, for the support of the sliiveriiig, h:ilf-ilro\viied Germans, who were undoubtedly waiting, on the western bank of the stream, for their eo-operation. When the movement of the assaulting party, toward the ford, was seen from the summit of the hill, Colonel Haslet applied to General McDougal for the two field- pieces, in order that a lire might be opcued on the advancing column; but (leneral McDougal spared only one of the two guns; and that was so poorly appointed that the Colonel was obliged, i)ersonally, to assist in dragging it along the rear of his Regiment, to the place where ho desired to post it. While it was being tlius slowly dragged along the rear of the line of Americans, it is said that a shot from the Hes- sian guns struck its carriage, scattering the shot, etc., and leaving a wad of tow blazing in the middle of the debris. With the exception of a single man, who " was prevailed upon to tread out the blaze and col- " lect the shot," " all the Artillery-men fled," leaving Colonel Haslet and the field-piece entirely unsup- ported ; but it appears that some of these later fugi- tives returned ; nuide a couple of discharges ou the euemy; and then retired, "'with the field-piece," not to be seen again, until after they were securely tjuar- of eacli of which his fathi i's (^>iui>suiy of Artillery and his father were, invariahlv, the principal subjects. Such a speculation would reipiire little reflection, in ortler to show its iniprobahility to any one ; but Lossing, (Field book nf the lie mint ion, original edition, ii.,822;) Irving,* (I.ife of tironjf Wnghiiiiitiin, ii., .'iil2 ;) and otIieiN having followed that leader, and repeated his errors. Bui tieueral Howe's despatch to Lord George (^erniaiiie left no room for doubting, and clearly indicated thai the troops forded the stream ; ."^au thier's r/.oi iif thr Oyii/n/ioiis, etc., (the liritish ollicial Map.l c learly in (licated that the Royal trooite crossed the river at " The Ford," designated on the Map; Ttie Plan of thr Comitnj from Frotja Point to Cntton liiver, ((General Washington's Map, ) did the same, also designating the " Ford ;'" The .liiwiKiJ Itrijintir for ITTli, (History of Europe, 17S,*| clearly under- stood the river was forded ; Stcdnian, in his JliMnnj of the Ameriaiu Wnr, (i., 214,) said, " A part of onr left wiug pas.sed the ford, whi< h wiis "entirely under command of onr cannon;" Sergeant Land>, of the Welsh Fnsileei-s, in his Jonrunl of Ocrm-renos iluriiitj the lute Ainericau Wnr, (page 1211, 1 Slid the entire assjiulting party, whom he described, in detail. " marched down and cnissed the ford ; " Doctor .\ndrews, in his Hirlonj of the U'nr, (ii., lift,) stated the a.ssaullingpai ty ' marched down " to the ford, and crossed it;" (ieneral Heath, an eje-witneas of the ntovenient, stated, in his Mrmoim, (iKige 78,) that "a part of the left col- " nmn, composed of British and Hessians, forded the river," etc. ; Chief justice Marshall, in his Life of George Woshinglim. (ii., r>(l4,) with lienenil Washington's juiiH'rs before him, clearly knew nothing of any bridge, constructed by the Itoyal Army; aud lloclor Sparks, also with the papers of Ueni'nil W;u5liington before him, in his Life nf (Jeorr/r n'nihiiojioii, (la^e lOi;,) after having described all the troops who h.-id been ordered to make the assault, .said, -'they forded the Bronx, and " formetain, and what he assumed to have I been the womlerful services of that Company, on the occasion now under notice. As we have already stateil, {ride page i'.V.), ante,) there are veiy grave doubts concerning Caiitaiu Hamilton's presence, with the Company, on Cliatterton's-hill, on the eventful day of the Battle ; and it is of ques- ! tionable |)ropriety, therefore, to identify him w ith the shortcomings of his command, so gmphically jiortrajed by Colonel Haslet, in his letter to General Rodney, to which we have referred, in thi' text— shorlcoin- iugs which were certainly such as reflected nothing else than disgrace on both the body of the Company and the Otlicer who was in com- mand, ou .that occasion, whomsoever he may have been. Generals Washington, Howe, Coruwallis, Robertson, and Heath, and : Captains Harris and Hall, all of whom witnessed the action and de- j scribed it, and Gordon, Stcduiau, Jlarshall, and Sparks, all of them j standard historiau.s, whose ailvautages for aoiuiring accurate informa- tion were in nowise neglected, were uniformly and rigidly silent on the subject of the alleged services of Captain Hamilton's Company of .\rtillery; while the advei-se testimony of Colonel Haslet, which we have stated in the text, sujjporled, in a great measure by that of Cap- tain Hull, the latter concerning the other of the two pieces and those who nninned it, on the extreme left of the line, (Campbell's The Iler- olutionarij Serricen oiiri Ciril Life of General William Hull, [A,) leaves nothing, concerning that Company, on that occasion, to which the admirers of Alexander Hamilton can refer, w ith any pleasure, the pre- 1 tensions of his son, to which we have referred, to the contrary not- withstanding. '- General Hoice to Lord George Germuiiie, " New-York, 30 November, " 177G ;" Tlie Annual Ilegisler for 177G, History of Europe, 178 * ; History of the n'ar in America, Edit. Dublin : 17"!), i., l!).'); etc. ^Sauthier's Plan of the Operatiitns of the King's Army, etc. General Heath, an eye-witness, siiid, that, after they had "forded the "river," they "marched along, under the cover of the hill, until they "had gained sufficient gro\ind to the left of the Americans, when, by "facing to the left," etc.— (.l/cmoirs, 78.) ^General Howe tn Jjord George (Sernitiine, *^ 'Sr.w'-YonK, 30 November, *' 177C;'' The Annuol Register for 177('», History of Europe, 17K* ; etc. General Heath, who witnessed the movement, said that, "by facing "to the left, their column became a line, parallel with the .Americans, " when they briskly ascended the hill. . . . — {Memoirs, I ' .Veinoirs of General Heath, 78, 79. 442 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. were posted, as we have already stated, the Regiment of Massachusetts Militia commanded by Colonel Brooks, sheltered behind asrone wall and supported by there- mains of the Maryland Regiment commanded by Col- onel Smallwood, ' and, probably, by the Third Regi- ment of New Yorkers commanded by Colonel Ritze- ma ; ^ and, against these, the two assaulting parties simultaneously directed their overwhelming power. There was no Artillery to hurl destruction on either of the assailants: since, by that time, the Delaware Regiment, immediately on their left, was confronted by the Fifth and Forty-ninth Regiments, who had also crossed the river and were climbing the hill-side, "zealous to distinguish themselves," there was no support for the hard-pressed " Maccaronis " and their New York comrades : and nothing else than their own resolute wills and their strong arms and their not generally trusty and always ill-supplied muskets were there, to su])[)ort those less than eleven hundred Offi- cers and Privates in their approaching struggle with two well-disciplined, well-armed, well-commanded British Regiments, besides the Hessian forlorn-hope, on their front, and three equally well-disciplined, well-armed, and well-commanded Hessian Regiments, on their right Hank. It is recorded that the Regiment of jNIilitia, com- manded by Colonel Brooks, notwithstanding the shel- ter afforded by the stone wall, " fled in confusion, "without more than a random, scattering fire;"'' leaving the Marylanders and New-Yorkers, alone and unsu[)ported ; and it also recorded that these last- named Regiments advanced to the brow of the hill, meeting their assailants, and throwing on them, while they were climbing the hill-side, an etTective, plung- ing fire, compelling them to fall back.* But the retreat of the Militia, to whom appears to have been assigned the part of holding Colonel Rail in check, having entirely ex{)osed the right flank of the two Regiments to the charge of his Brigade, while the three Regiments of British and Hessian troops who were climbing up the eastern face of the hill, not- withstanding the check which they had sustained, were rallied and renewed their assault on the front of the position, the conflict was too unecpuil to be long- sustained ; and, notwithstanding the stubborn bravery which was necessary to sustain it, with such great odds against the Americans, during the long period of not less than a quarter of an hour,* the two brave ' Colonel HasUl to General Csuar Rodnei/, "November 12, 1776." 2 Wo have found no mention of the movement of the Regiment com- manded by Colonel Kitzema for the support of tlio Regiments com- manded by Colonel Brooks and Smallwood, on the riglit of the line ; but it is reasonable that support was needed, there; and there is sat isfactory evidence that Colonel Ritzema and his command icere realltj Iherr, during the action : we shall not stop to enqnire just when they went to that very exposed position. 3 Colonel Hdslet to General Ciesur liodiw}/^ "November 12, 1T7G." * Letter to a Gfnllemnn in Annnpnlis^ dated " White-Pi-aixs, October 20. " 1776." 6 "After a smart engagement for about a quarter of an hour, obliged Regiments were compelled to " give way " — they fell back, fighting as they went, as brave men would be likely to do, under such circumstances. But the action on Chattertou's-hill was not con- fined to the simultaneous assaults on the front and right flanks of the Americans who occupied it. Very closely after the Twenty-eighth and Thirty-fifth, the Fifth and Forty-ninth Regiments also lorded the Bronx ; and moved to the positions which had been assigned to them, respectively ; and climbed up the side of the hill ; ' and assaulted the position which was occupied by " The Blue Hen's Chickens "—the Regiment of Delaware troops, commanded by Colonel Haslet — " foemeu worthy of their steel." That Kegi- ment numbered very few, if any more, than three hun- dred fighting Officers and Privates ; and yet, single- handed — the two Regiments on its right were already engaged, with assailants on both their front and flank ; and the First New York Regiment and the Regi- ment of Connecticut troojis, the latter commanded by Colonel Charles Webb, were also employed in oppos- ing Colonel Donop's Brigade of Hessians, who were " ascending the height, with the greatest alaci'ity and "in the best of order" — that single regiment bravely sustained the attack, until after the Regiments which had covered its right had given way, when " part of " the first three Companies of the Regiment also rc- " treated, in disorder," with considerable loss.* The left of the Regiment, however, with the greater num- ber of its Otticers, notwithstanding the retreat of the Regiments on its right and that of its own three Com- panies had exposed its right to the combined assaults of, at least, the Hessian Battalion who had been the forlorn-hope and two of the British Regiments and Colonel Rail's entire Brigade, while two other British Regiments were on its front, fell back only far enough to occupy " a fence, on the to]) of the hill,'' a position which it continued to occupy and defend, successfully . until the two Regiments which covered its left had also given way, when, it, also, " retired," the last of the Americans who remained on the hill, and that resolute force, small as it was, who held back the suc- cessful assailants, then eager to become pursuers, and covered the retreat of those who, then, remained of the defenders of Chatterton's-hill."' "our men to give way." — {Colonel lioherl H. Httrriaon to the Pre»idenl of Ihf Congress, " W'HiTE-Pi.AiNS, October 2!), 1770.") " After a very smart engagi'ment for fifteen or twenty minwies, they "obliged our men to give way." — {Colonel Robrrt }{, Httrrifon to General Schuyler, "White Plains, November 1, 1776. ') "The Militia Regiment fled * * Colonel Smallwood, in a quarter "of an hour afterwards, gave way, also." — {^Colonel Haslet tii General Ctrsar Rodney, "November 12, 1776.'") <> Colonel HmUtto General Ciesnr Rodney, " November 12, 1776. " ' General Howe to Lord George Gennidne, " New-Vouk, 30 November, "1776 ; ' The Amiunl Register for 1776, History of Europe, 178* ; History of the War in America, Edit. Dublin : 1779, i., l;i.5 ; etc. ^Riiurns of the Strength of the Regimentt engaged, etc. (Vide page 44.5, post.) ' Colonel Haslet to Getwrnl Cfesnr Rodney, "November 12, 1776." 1" Oi,lonel Haslet to General Ciesar Rodney, " November 12, 1776." THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 443 But the action was, also, not confined to the as- saults on nor to the defences of the right and center of the Americans, on the top of that notable hill. The four Regiments composing the Brigade commanded by (Jeneral Leslie, were soon followed, "with the " greatest alacrity and in the best order," through the river, at the lord, and up the Mill-lane, and up the eastern face of the hill, by the Chasseurs and by three, if not by, four, Regiments of Hessian Grenadiers, com[iosing the Brigade commanded by Colonel Donop.' In front of these, on the summit of the hill, were the skeleton First New York Regiment, formerly commanded by General McDougal, but then evidently without Field-officers and commanded by one of its Captains ; and the Regiment of Connecticut troops commanded by Colonel Charles Webb, very little stronger in efl'ective men, than the other; and, very probably, one of the two field-pieces which constituted the armament of the Cimipany of New-York Artillery of whom Alexander Hamilton was the official com- mander — the other of the two pieces, as the reader will remember, was posted on the extreme right of the line, under the command of Colonel Haslet.' All these numbered, in the aggregate, not many, if any, more than four hundred fighting Officers and Pri- vates;' and, with their only piece of artillery dis- mounted, evidently before the assailants commenced to ascend the hill,' and without any support or defen- sive works, it is scarcely jjrobable that much was expected from so feeble a body, in the face of so heavy a body of assailants. But the records indicate that all those of the two feeble Regiments who were present on the field, performed their duty satisfacto- rily to the Commander-in-chief;' and, we are t(d(l that, when an effort was made by the assailants to turn the left of the line, a detachment from Colonel Webb's Regiment, commanded by Captain William Hull, defeated the attempt, with spirit and prompti- tude, although he was opposed by more than double the number of his own commaDd. * ' O'eiiern/ Iluice In Lord Genrge (lennaiiie, "New-Yokk, 30 November, "1776." The .IiiiiimI lleijisler for 177t>, Iliatory of Europe, 178 * ; The Hintiirij of the Wtir in Atiieriea, Kdit. Dublin : 1779, 1!)5 ; etc. It H po.-«iblu timt one of the Uejiimentsof that Brigade bad been de- tailed, to itet (w tile forlorn-bope, in the assault, as we have already stated, - Viile page 4-11 , ante. ' Keluriu of the Strength of the Regiments •■ngiiged, etc. (Vide page 44.T, post.) ei.i-hia, Wednesday, November C, 1776. " Memoirs of Major-general Heath, 79. See, also, WUIiam Jhn-rimn to the Maryland Council of Softly, "(Jeokok- "town, Kent-coi ntv, '28 November, 1776." '2 Colonel Hadel to General C»'ar Rodney, ' November 12." Letter to a l^entlmtan in .4(*m«^(o/(j*, dated " White-Plains, October 29 " 1776 ;" published in The Pinnsytranin J'airnal, No. 1771, Philadel- phia, Wednesday. November 13, 1776. M Memoirs of General Heath, 79. General Howe, in his despatch to Lord lieorge (iermaine, dated '• New - " York, 30 November, 1776," stated that, after the engagement, " the " Hessian (Jrenadiers," [those who had assaulted the l^ft of the Ami ricaus,] " were ordered forward, upon the heights, within cannon-sliot of the "entreuchiiients, the Bronx, from its winding course, being slill between 444 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. prepared his dinner, for the purpose of doing which he tore down and burned a barn which belonged to John Hunt, on property, on the western portion of the hill, which, in our younger days, belonged to his two sons, Thomas and Jacob Hunt. ' The strength of the Americans, under General Spencer, who were engaged on the Plain ; who were alarmed at either the Hessians or the Light Dragoons ; and who fled, over the river and far away, among the hills of Greenburgh, was, as we have already stated, not far from twenty-five hundred elfective Officers and Privates: that of the Regiments who composed the force on the top of the hill, who defended the position, and who were really the heroes of the day, exclusive of the Company of Artillery, who rendered no effect- ive service, was not far from seventeen hundred eftect- " them and the enemy's," [(fce Americriu's.] " riglit flank; the Second " Brigade of British," [thnse ir?io had asstiuUed thv fronts of the right and centre of the Americans,] "formed in tlie rear of the Hessian Grena- "diers; and the two Brigades of Hessians, on the left of the Second " Brigade, with their left upon the road leading from Tarrj-town to the "White Plains" — that is to s-iy, the entire force, on the western hank of the Bronx, was moveil northward, until its left was above that oUl road, still continued, which extends from the bridge, near the railroad-station, westward, over Chatterton's-hill. 1 Information conmiunicated to us, persi>nally, more than tliirty years since, by the two gentlemen named, who, then, were our near neighbors and personal friends. 2 The Helnrus of t>ie Eillfil, Wounded, mid Missing, in each of the several Regiments who had formeil that bashful detachment leave no room for doubt concerning tlie Regiments of whom it was really composed— indeed, there may Iiave been otliei-s whose modesty forbade the making of any such Returns, and who have tliereby escaped our notice. The Regiments of whom we find mention, as we have already stated, were those conmianded, respectively, by Colonels Silliman, Seldeu, Sage, and Douglass (the latter commanded by Lieutenant-colonel Arnold,) all belonging to the Brigade commanded by General Wadsworth ; the Regi- ment commanded by Colonel Chester, of the Brigade commanded by Colonel Sargent ; the Regiments commanded, respectively, by Colonels Baldwin, Douglass, and Lieutenant colonel Ely, of the Brigade com- manded by General Saltonstall ; and the Regiments commanded, respec- tively, by Colonels Holmau and Smith, of the Brigade commanded by General Fellows— all of them New Englanders and some of them experts in running, as was shown at Kip's-bay, in the preceding Sep- tember. The Returns of the strength of each of those several Regiments, on the twenty-first of September, on the fifth of October, and on the third of November, — the last, five days after the action, — were as follows : September 21. Regiments. ic O 3 1 a land. JS Vile. Q 9* s 1 Com. « Non-coi Fit for Sick, pi Sick, a s o o c o 1 Furlovi Tot Rank an Colonel SilHman's 26 4 47 194 57 81 60 392 30 4 45 271 46 116 52 485 33 4 44 217 54 142 65 487 104 149 4 47 262 38 1 554 25 5 38 225 147 19 77 468 Lt.-Col. Ely's ' 76 '46 344 102 " 72 591 Colonel Smith's 35 6 48 336 85 76 46 543 •• ive Officers and Privates. ' The strength of all the force which was directed against that feeble body of men cannot be definitely ascertained, since the Hes- sian Artillerists, on the eastern bank of the river, whose fire was, certainly, to some extent, effective, were clearly as much a portion of that antagonistic force as those who crossed the river and assaulted the position or as those who charged on the right flank of thestruggling Americans, and assisted in driving them from the hill. Besides those Hessian Artillerists, there were four Regiments of British troops, commanded by General Leslie ; the Hessian Regiment, probably from Colonel Donop's command, who occupied the place of danger and honor, as the forlorn-hope; the three Regiments of Hessians, commanded by Colonel Rail ; and the four or five Regiments of Hessians, October 5. Regiments. Com. Officers. Non-c .£ "H p: Colonel Silliman'8 24 2 47 152 83 105 49 389 Colonel Selden'K 3(1 4 45 24(1 73 107 73 476 Colonel Sage's 32 4 45 162 194 155 62 494 22 3 49 liOl 62 120 93 476 ( 'olonel *'hester's 31 4 4.1 2()2 123 23 133 ' 2 ,-.43 (Colonel lialdwin's 28 37 234 122 34 74 464 24 4 41 144 24 5 17 190 Lieut. -Col. Ely's 30 3 39 219 6 27 9 • 2- 263 ('olonel liolnian's 34 47 286 148 70 85 589 35 5 48 327 90 . '* 48 r-39 Total 29(1 39 443 2227 925 720 643 4 4423 November 3. Regiments. Com. Officers. Non-com. Off. 1 Fit for Duty. c a it Xl Sick, absent. On Command. V £ c _i Total, Offl's and men. (loloncl .''illiman's . . . 14 2(- 140 18 160 58 376 418 Colonel Seidell's. . , . 15 I 27 224 42 142 69 477 521 15 46 170 72 185 61 478 541 Colonel Douglass's. . . 19 4 37 228 36 128 72 ' 1 465 525 Colonel Chester's . . . 4 ■m 234 107 41 135 3 52(1 558 Colonel Baldwin's . . . 27 3 44 288 50 32 56 426 500 Colonel Dougliiss's. . . 21 4 35 56 41 25 22 ' 1 145 205 Lieut. -Col. Ely's . . . 29 3 38 119 53 57 IS 247 317 Colonel Holman's . . . 22 4 29 306 102 84 80 .572 627 Colonel Smith's. . . . 13 5 36 311 51 116 52 53(1 584 184 33 343 2076 572 970 613 5 4236 4796 It will be seen that five hundred and sixty Officers, Staff, non-commis- .Moned Officers and Musicians, and two thousand and seventy-si.x Pri- vates, present and fit for duty, survived the hazards of the engagement, and had returned to the Camp, five days after the Battle ; and the reader will readily perceive that our estimate of the effective strength of the detachment on the occasion under consideration, is a reasonable one, sustained as it is by the contemporary statement of Lieutenant-colonel Tilghman, one of the Aides of General Washington, (,LeUcr to hit father, " WniTK-pL.M.vs, 31" October, 177C;") and by that of Brigade-major Tallmadge, of General Wadsworth's Brigade, himself a participant in the affair on the Plain and in the discreditable retreat, {Memoir of Vohnel Benjamin Tallmadge, prepared by himself, 13;) for both of which see pages 43f>, 437, ante. 1 The Returns of the strength of these several Regiments, on the THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 445 coiiimauded by Colonel Doiiop, each or all of whom could not have contained less than six hundred twoiity fiiist of Septeinlier, the fifth of October, ami on the third of November— tlio last, five days after the Battle, — were as follows; September 21. Re^iiiieiitn. £ y 3 Staff. Non com. Officers. Fit for Duty. o it u (O Sick, absent. ■0 a S 3 a •d & .a ,3 3 1 Total, 1 Rank and File.' Colonel Smallwood's . . . Colonel Uitzenia's Late Col. McDoucars 1 First New-York Reg't. | Colonel Webb's 41 •16 ■i'i *2r> l:i 3 5 5 2 48 33 41 20 2r) 427 265 435 215 219 39 22 ■49 89 294 611 125 44 38 80 66 8 79 192 ' 4 2 840 417 568 387 540 137 20 167 1561 199 501 425 6 2752 Octobei Regiments. t 9 £ iB cd Si Non-com. Officers. Fit for Duty. a « 2 if oS ■a 1 On Command. Furlougbed. Total, Rank and File, t Colonel Brooks's Colonel SumllwoiHl's . . . . Colonel Rit/.eina's Late (;ol. MeDouKal's ) First New- York Keg't. J ' Colonel Webb's t ru 18 27 14 9 ' 5 3 4 5 3 . . 49 28 34 19 21 322 217 38.T 1.53 185 190 34 30 90 191 57 149 67 40 ' 71 72 29 78 210 -6 2 774 381! .'>09 328 533 99 20 161 1'262 350 504 400 •2590 Novemlier 3. Regiments. [ Com. Officers. Staff. Non-com. Officers. [ Fit for Duty. I Sick, present, j Sick, Rbsen ■0 s d s s c Furlougbed. | ToUiI, Rank and File. •£ 1 ll CH as Colonel Brooks's . . . Colonel Smallwood's . Colonel Rit/.eiiia's. . . Colonel Haslet's . . . Late Col. MoDougal's \ Ist New- York Reg't. § J Colonel Webb's .... 30 5 301 8 21; 4 13 3 2li 5 16 3 .50 37 27 21 19 27 340 298 198 273 142 191 81 84 12 26 22 73 46 354 61 228 76 46 ' .57 61 21 13 208 19 1 10 1 9 40 480 794 342 548 254 527 2951 571 809 394 585 299 573 3291 Total 131 28 181 1442 298 811 360 It will be seen that three hundred and forty Officers, Staff, non-com- missioned Othcers, and Jlusicians, and one thousand, four hundred, and forty-two Private^*, present and fit for duty, survived the Battle, and, five days after that event, were returned as effective. The losses which they ha«l sustained, in the action, and the probable alisence of some, on that occasion, must be taken into the account; and we believe that the num- ber of Officei-s and Privates who were actually engaged was about that which we have stated in the text. Gordon, {Hitbiry of the American Kevolution, ii., 341,) reduced the nuin * Not, then, in the service. t " General Lincoln's Militia from Massachusetts, so scattered and " ignorant of the forms of Returns, that none can be got." t In the original Eetnnu, the total of Rank and File is stated at 836 : we have lieeii unable to ascertain where the error in the details, is. I In the original Kelurns. the total of Rank and File is stated at 314 : We have been unable to ascert.tin where the error in the details, is. OlHcei's and Privates, making an aggregate of about seven thousand, five hundred efl'ective men. ' The loss sustained by the Americans was not as great as was, at first, supposed ' — the return to the Camp of the greater number of the fugitive New Eiig- landers reduced the supj)0.sed losses from " between " four or five hundred in killed, wounded, and misa- " ing," which was the first estimate, to twenty-two killed, twenty-four wounded, and one missing, in the detachment commanded by General Spencer;^ and, exclusive of the losses sustained by the Regiments commanded, respectively, by Colonels Haslet and Brooks, of which no Returns have been found, the loss of those who were on the top of the hill and who fought the battle, was two Captains, four Sergeants, one Corporal, and eighteen Privates, killed; one Col- onel, three Lieutenants, one Ensign, four Sergeants, and forty-three Privtites, wounded ; and sixteen Pri- ber of those who remained, after the Militia had given way, to 8i.\ hun- dred men; Chief-justice Marshall, (Ilistonj «/ George Wusltingttm, ii., 502,) and Doctor Sparks. (Lift- of General M'ushiiiijlwt, 190,) each with the papers of General Washington before him, statcil the force under Gen- eral McDoiigal was "about sixteen hundred" men. 1 General Howe was silent concerning the iiunuM'ical strengtli of the force which he had thus employed ; and none of the British authori- ties were any more coniinuuicative. Stediiian, however, {Hislonj of the American War, i., 215,) clearly intimated that tiic force which was re- quired to take and occupy Chatterton's-hill, when diverted for that purpose, so greatly weakened the Royal .\rniy, then on the White Plains, that " it was obvious that the latter could no longer ex|)ediently "attempt anything against the enemy's" [ftie Amerintnx' \ main " body." W'e may be allowed to s;iy, ill this connection, that the practise of that period, in making mention of the strength of detachnieiits or of that of the Army itself, was to include only the Rank and Kile, excluding the Commissioned Officers, the Staff, and the 11011-comnilssioiied Officers, all of them, to some extent, at least, effective fighting men. '-' Compare the letter from Colonel Robert H. Harrison, the Secretary of General Washington, to the President of the Congress, dated " White- " Pl.vi.vs, 29 October, 1770," with General Washington's letter to the same, dated " White-Plains, November, 1770," in the latter of which he Sitid, "I am happy to inform yon, that, in the engagement on Mon- '• day se'nniglit, 1 have reason to believe our loss was, by no means, so " considerable as wiis conjectured, at fii'st." See, also. Colonel Robert H. Hurrison^s letter to Governor TnimbtiU, "White-Plains, November 0, 1770;" llie same to Governor Cmike, " WiiiTE-Pl..4iNS, November G, 1770; " etc. ' The following table will show the losses which were sustained by each of the several Regiments who composed that tietachment : Killed. Wounded. Miasg. Regiments. m _. « U rivatei p B. X a s _. rivatei •ivates % £ CO w C/J d a. 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 t 9 C^ilonel Chester's I 3 1 1 Colonel Ilolnian's . ... 1 8 Colonel Smith's 1 • i 1 ToUl 3 1 18 1 1 1 1 2 !_ n! 446 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. vates, missing' — among those who were killed were Captains Bracco and Scott, of Colonel Smallwood's Regiment; and, among those who were wounded, were Colonel Smallwood and Lieutenants Goldsmith and Waters, of the same Regiment. ^ General Howe re- ported to the Home Government, evidently including all who were captured in Westch ester-county, that one Captain, two Lieutenants, one Quarter-master, and thirty-five Privates were taken, "October 12 — "White Plains;"'' but we have no means for ascer- taining who of these were taken prisoners on the twenty-eighth of October. The loss sustained by the Second Brigade of British troops, commanded by Gen- eral Leslie, was Lieutenant-colonel Carr,Captains Deer- ing and Gore, Lieutenant Jocelyn, Ensign Eagle, oiu Sergeant, and twenty-nine Rank and File,* killed; Lieutenant-colonel Walcott,'' Captain Fitzgerald, Cap- tain-lieutenant Ma.ssey,* Lieutenants Taylor, Banks, and Roberts, twelve Sergeants, and one hundred and two Rank and File, ' wounded ; and two Rank and File, * missing. ' The three Regiments composing the 1 The I'olluwiiig table will sliuw the losses which were sustained by each of the several Regiments whu were posted on the hill. Reginient.s. Killed. 'Wounded. Missing. 1 Lieut. 1 1 Ensign. { ■(* at CO 1 Corporal. 1 Privates. 1 Colonel. 1 Captain. 1 Lieut. 1 Ensign. X S; u « CO Corporals. 1 Privates. Officers. m \ General Leslie ; and find tliat, although the details of the cla.ssifications differ, the aggregate of the British loss is the same — one hundred and fifty-seven Officers and Men. General Hoire's Return of Commisttioned and Xoti-cnmmmtoned (tffieerA, Rank and File, Killed, Wounded, and Missing, appended to his despatch to Lord George Germaine, dated "New-York, 3 December, 1776." It is i)roper for us to say, however, that that Return induiled al! the losses sustained by the Regiments referred to, from the nineteenth to the twenty-eighth of October, both these dates included ; and it is possi- ble, therefore, that some of the casualties named in the text were sus- tained elsewhere than on or near Chatterton's-hill. We have no means for ascertaining their exact losses, on the twenty-eighth of October. 11 We are not insensible tliat Stedman, in his History of the American War, (i., 214,) said "the reason of their " [the Americans,] "occupying " this posture," [on Chatterton's-hill,] " is inexplicable, unless it be that " they could not be contained within the works of their Camp;" but the reason assigned was too evidently ridiculous to be regarded with the slightest respect. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 447 iiig no portion of the Aiiu'rioau lines ; and nothing else thiui a supposition, on the part of (roneral Wash- ington's advisers anil on that of the (Jeneral himself, thai the continued ()eeu[)alion of it was absolutely es- sential to the safety of the main body, in the position whieh it then occupied, could possibly have led him to make such a costly and hazardous experiment, un- der tiie existing circumstances and in the iramediati presence of such an overwhelming enemy, as the con- tinued occupation and defence of Chatterton's-hill. But (reneral Washington had evidently planned bet- ter than he knew ; and, in the proviilence of (Jod, sonic results which were more beneficial to the Americans than any which he had conceived and ho[)ed for, were niupiestionably derived from thai seemingly unpromising experiment of occupying and holding tiiat exceedingly exposed position, on the western bank of the Bronx; among which result-*, in America, we may mention the effect of that occupa- tion, as an apparent menace against the left Hank and rear of the Royal Army, in whatever movement that Army, under (Jeneral Howe, should make against the American lines; tlie delay in that evidently projected movement of the Royal Army, to enable its command- ing (xcneral to remove what ajtpeared to have been a dangerous element from Chatterton's-hill — a delay whieh enabled the Americans to strengthen their de- fensive works and to become better prep.ared for de- fending them, whenever the Royal Army should move against them ; — and the reduction of that great Army, which was, then, in front of the American lines, and ready to move against them, for the purpose of assault- ing the Americans who had occupied the hill as well for that of holding the hill, subsequently, which re- duction of the strength of his main body compelled General Howe to wait for the arrival of reinforcements, to abandon his intention to assault the works which sheltered the main body of the American Army, and, finally, to retire from Westchester-county — the first- mentioned of which consequences aflbrding still further time and opportunities to General Washing- ton and his feeble command : the latter two afibrding to the Americans, everywhere, the tclat, as well as some of the advantages, of better generalship and of conse- quent success. All these, among other not much less- important results, although they were probably hid- den from General ^\'ashington, when he devised and ordered the movement, were, unquestionably, among the residts, in America, of that " inexplicable " occu- pation of Chatterton's-hill, on the morning of the twenty-eighth of October, ITTli: with the results, in Europe, of that occupation, we have nothing to do, in this place.' ' In our preparation nf tliis ileiicriptinn of the engagement on Chatter- toii's-liill, j;< niT,il!y calked " Tiik Batti.k "F Wiiitk-Pi.mns," \vc have exaiiiini-, dated Orlober 28, ITTC, at two o'l lotk, P.M., piiblUhed in As we have elsewhere stated, theadvancing columns of the Royal Army had been formed, in line, with the Right resting on the road leading from the White Plains to Mamaroneck, and the Left resting on the The I'eniisi/leiiiiiit Kreiiiiuj Post, Vol. II., No. 278, I'liii.ADKi.i'iiiA, Thurs- day, Octolter :U, I77(>, and in The PeuufylvauUi Joimutl, No. 1770, Piiii.A- OEi.piiiA, November (i, 177 a Geidli iiHin in Aninipoliii, dated " WlIiTE-I'l.AINS, October *'2U, 1770," published in The Peinis/iletinia Jounud, No. 1771, Phii.ahki.- I'HIA, Wednewlay, Novonibei- 177(> ; the Letter from (he Cumii, dated Will iK-l'i.AiNs, October2i), 177ti, published in The Fnemati'sJouniiit, «r I Seir Ilmniishiie Ga.-.ille,\ul. I., No. 26, I'oKTSMorTIl, Tuesday, Novem- ber T.', 1771; ; Geiieriil (irder of the Armij, in the case of ('olouel Webb, '• HKAn-gi'Ain'Kits, Wiin K-I'i.AiNS, October 2'.l, 1770;" Lieutenant entotn l Tihjhmnn's letter to iVillium l>Mr, dated " IlEAD-yUAItTBKs, WiiriE- " I'l.Ai.vs, October 29, 177G ; " the same to his fiilher, dated "WiilTE- " Plains, October :!1, 17711;" the Letter /mm Stnm/onl, dated October 30, 1770, published in The tVeenuin''8 Jonrnnl, or New-fiittnpshire Gazette, Vol. I., No. 2.''>, I'oiiTs.McPi'Tii, Tuesday, November 12, 17711 ; the Letter of Colonel Hohert H. Iliirrisou In Ccnerol Schinjler, •' WiiiTE-Pl.AiNs, Novem- "berl, 1770;" the Letter from n Genlleninn in the ,\rm;i, ilateil " ('ami- " NEAK THE M1I.I..S AllOl'T TIIHEE .MILES NoRTU OE THE WlllTE PLAINS, "November 1, 177(1," published in The I'enusijlennoi Erening I'nsl, Vol. II., No. 2SI>, PiiiLAPELi'iliA, Tliiirsday, November 14, 177(1, in Force's .Imcr- iciiu .{rehires, V., iii., 471-474, and, in a mutilated form, in Kiauk Moore's liitirij of the .{mericiin Herolnlion, i., ^IJ.'i-lW? ; Colonel Robert II. llarrison^s letter to Gorernor Trnnihnll, dated " Wiiite-Plaixs, November 2, 177(1 ; '' Lientenont-rolonel Titijhinnn's letter to WiIWdii Dner, dated "Head yi All- "tkr.«, near White-Plains, November 2, 177(i;" Colonel Gist's letter lo the Manjluid Conniil of t>iifetij, dateUnl of the CoH'jriss, ilaled "White-Plains, November 0, 1770 ;" Ciiloiiel Hobert II. Harrison's teller to Gorernnr Trninbull, dalefl " White-Plains, "November (;, 1770;'' Colonel Haslel's letter to General Ciesar Hotlneij, dated November 12, 1770 ;'' Dnelor Pine's tetter to James Til(/hnian, dated "Camp at the White-Plains, November 7, 177'j;" General Howe's (lenpaleh to h>ril Geortje Germaine, fiiiteil " New-Yokk, November "30, 1770;" the Ij'tter of William Harrison to the Maryland Conneil of Safelij, dated " Geohoetown, Kent-i'oi ntv, 2Sth November, "1770; " General Helnms of the .inn;/, September 21, October o, and November 3, 1770 ; Itelnrns of Killed, Wonnded, find Missing, [in the .\iiicrican Army,] 11/ several .ielions, published in Force's Ameriean .{reh- ires, v., iii., 7I.V730; Return of (.Commissioned and Non-comntissifjned (tf' ^fleers and Rank and I'de, Rilled, {VoHnded, and Missing, from the \lth Sep- tember ht Ihe lO(/j Norcniher, inelnsiee, appended to General Howe's despateh to Ijord George (rermaine, "New- York, 3 I>eceinber, 1770;" Sautbier's Plan of Ihe Operations of the King's . \rmy under the Comnumd of Sir iVil- liant Howe, K.B., in Xeir- York and Ea.tt Sew Jersey against the .imeriean Forces commanded by General Washington, from Ihe I2tk of (letober to the 2Sth of Soecndter, 1770 ; .1 Plan of the Connlry from Frog's Point to Crolon River; The K.rominatiou of Joseph lialloway, Rs'/., before a Committee of the Hiotse of Onnmons; [CJalloway's] hite.rsto a Nobleman ; The Sarralire of Sir Williiim Howe, . . with sione itbservat'ums upon a pamphlet enti- tled Letters to a Nobleman ; [Galloway's] Reply to Ihe Observations of Lieut, (ien. Sir William Howe, on a iiamphlet entitled Letters to a Sable- man ; .\lmon's Parliamentary Register, Volumes -XL, XII., and XIII.; The Annual Register for 1776 ; The History of Ihe War in .Imeriea, Edit., Piiblin ; 17'<9; [llall'sj History of Ihe Civil War in .\merica ; Essois hisbo-- ignes et politiqnes sttr la li' volntiioi de I' .Xmeriqne Seplentrixmale, par IVI. Hil liard d'.Vuberteiiil ; .\iii\rcwss Hinlory af the War with .Unerica, Frame, Spain, and Holland; Souies's Hisloire des TrtmbUs rtj of Sew York during the flevohdionarij War, and de Lancet's SoleA on that work ; Ban- croft's i/istoci/ atch to Lord George Germaine, dated "Nf.w-Yobk, 3 December, 1776," it was stated that the only one of either of the two Kegiinents of the Light Dragoons then in America, who was killed, from the nineteenth to the twenty-eighth of October, inclusive, was one Kauk and File, of flie Seventeenth Itegi- ment ; and, very probably, that one was the same to whom we have re- ferred, in the text. ^ Memoirs of Major general Jfeatli, 7?*. 1" General Howe to Lord George Gennaine, " New-Yokk, 30 November, "1770." 11 David How's Diary, October 29 and 30, 1770. See, also. Lieutenant-colonel Tilghman to his father, " White Plains, 31 "October, 1776 " ; Memoirs of Major-general Heath, 79 ; etc. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 449 the interval had been undoubtedly occupied by the Americans, in industriously strengthening their posi- tion, they could scarcely have made defensible and formidable what, only a few iiours previous, had been hardly respectable. Indeed, at no time, even under the most favorable circumstances, were the defences of the American lines, immediately above the Plains, in any respect formidable ; and the center, where the post-road passed through them, was decidedly the weakest portion. Tliey liad been hastily constructed, without the superintendence of experienced Engi- neers. The stony soil prevented the ditch from being made of any troublesome depth or the parapet of a troublesome height : the latter was not fraised : only where it was least needed — probably because the con- struction of it, elsewhere, had been interfered with — was there the slightest appearance of an abatis.* There was little foundation, therefore, for General Howe's transparent excuses ; and it would have been more creditable to his candor, had he told the true reason for his failure to assault the lines, on the morning after the Battle and while the troops who had been designated to make the as- sault, with their line unbroken, were resting on their arms, within a mile and in open sight from the works which they were expecting to assault, and ready to move against them, at a moment's notice — the fact was simply this, as we have already seen,^ " the Army could no longer expediently attempt "anything against the enemy's" [the Americans'^ " main body ;" and it was necessary that it should be reinforced, before the Americans should be attacked. During Tuesday, the twenty-ninth of October, as we have seen, the Royal Army, "with very little al- "teration"in its position, encamped on the Plain, and awaited the arrival of reinforcements ; ^ and, not- withstanding the loss of Chatterton's-hill, in the opinion of some of the American Officers,* had made I lo this description of the character of the American defenses, we have followed Studuian, {IIMnri/ of the American War, i., 213,) who was probably present, in the Royal Army. We are not insensible that Bancroft, (nislonj of the United Stales, origi- nal edition, ix., 180 ; the same, centenary edition, v., 444,) has so framed bis sentence that his readers must suppose the abatis was us extended as the "lines of entrenchments ;" but tlie feebleness of the Army and the scarcity of teams could not have securetl so great a work, in so short a lime ; neither General Washington nor General Heath nor General Knox, among the Americans, nor General Howe nor General Lord Cornwallirt, among the King's troops, all of whom have more or less described the American defenses, has made the slightest allusion to such a general defense, before the long line of American entrenchments ; and Stednian expressly stated that "the point of the hill, on theenemy'g " right," [thai on the line of the Harlein Railroad, immediately northward from the Itaiiroad-statioH,] "exceedingly steep and rocky, was covered by " a strong abatis in front of the entrenchment," the very place, as we have said in the text, where such an additional mean of defense was least needed. For these reasons, we prefer to believe that the American lines were not, generally, furnished with an abatis. ' Vide page 448, ante. ' General Jlowe to Lord Ueorge Gemiaine, " New-York, 30 November, " 1776." * General Heath said, (Sfomoirs, 79,) "the British having got posses- " eion of this hill, it gave them a vast advantage of the American lines, " almost down to the center;' and General Knox, in a letter to his 40 it necessary for the American Army to abandon the position, the work of strengthening its lines was con- tinued, with unabated industry.* During Wednesday, the thirtieth of October, the King's troops were occupied in throwing up some defensive works and redoubts, on the Plain, in front of the American lines,'' and an entrenchment on the summit of Chatterton's-hill;' and, during the after- noon of the same day, four Regiments, from the lines on New-York-island,* and two Regiments of the Sixth Brigade, who had been posted at Mamaroneck, after the Queen's Rangers had been so " roughly brother, dated "Ne.\ii Wiiite-Pi.ains, 32 miles from New-York, 1 "Nov: 177(>," said " the enemy's having possession of this hill obliged " us to abandon some sliglit lines thrown up on the White Plains." 5 There was something which required explanation in what was written by General Washington's Secretary and, undoubtedly, with his ap- proval, to the President of the Congress, when he said, " Our post, from " its situation, is not so advantageous as could be wished ; and was only " intended us temporary and occasional, till the Stores belonging to tlie " .\rmy, which hail been deposited, heie, could be removed."— (OiJoik/ Robert 11. Harrison to the I\esident of the Congress, " White-Plains, 29 "October, 177fi." " The Stores belonging to the Army," at that time and for some time previous, had not been so abundant as to have been burdensome ; and, if there had been judicious oversight, they could have been carried a couple of miles further, to a place of greater safety, when they were carried to the White Plains, saving the repeated re-handling of them and the construction of two distinct lines of works for nothing else than for the " temporary and occasional" protection of them. There is, generally, a prodigality in the expenditure of both money and materials and labor, in all which relates to Armies ; but there seems to have been an excess of prodigality in the use of all these, of which the .\merican Army had such an insufficient supply, if the only purpose of the two lines of entrenchments, one at the foot and the other on the crest of the high grounds, at the White Plains, had been only for the "temporary and occasional " protection of a few Stores, handled and re- handled, over and over again, the whole of which could have been con- sumed by the Army, in less than six days, probably in half that time.* If there had been, in fact, no other reason than these, for occupying and fortifying that position, there was reason for General George Clin- ton's doubts, when he wrote, " Uncovered, as we are ; daily on fatigue ; " making redoubts, tleches, abatis, and lines; and retreating from " them and the little temporary Inits made for our comfort, before they " are well flnished, I fear, will ultimately destroy our Army, without " fighting." ..." However, I would not be understood to con- " dcmn measures. They may be right, for aught I know. I do not un- " derstand much of the refined art of War : it is said to consist of " strategem and deception."— (Geuerai George Clinton to John McKesson, " Cami' near the White Plains, October 31, 1776.") 6 Colonel Robert II. Harrison to the I'midi tit of the Congress, " White- " Plains, October 31, 1776 ;" Letter from a Genthman in the Army, dated " Camp near the Mills, aroi t three miles North oe the White- " Plains, November 1, 1776," published in The Pennsylvania Evening Pos*, Vol. II., No. 280, Philadelphia, Thursday, November H, 1776 ; .We- moim of General Hiath, 80; etc. T LieiUenant-colotxl Gist to the Man/land Conncil of Safely, "Camp "bekore the White-Plains, 2 November, 1776." 8Vido page 400, ante. ♦"His," [Ueneral Wathington't,] "apprehensions are exceedingly " great lest the Army should suffer much for want of necessary supplies " of Provisions, especially in the article of Flour. From the best in- " tclligence he is able to obtain, there is not more fn Camp and at the " several places where it has been deposited, than will servo the Army " longer than four or five days, proviiled the utmost care and economy " were used in i.ssuing it out ; but, from the waste and embez./.lement, " for want of proper attention to it, as it is reported to him, it is not " probable that it will last so long."— (Cu/oiie( Robert II. Harriton to Colonel Joseph Trumbull, Commissary-general of Provisions, " WuiTK- " Plains, November 1, 1776.") 450 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. "handled" by the Americans/ joined the main body of the Army, on the Plain, for the reinforce- ment of it.^ During the same day, {^Wednesday, October 30,] the Americans were not idle — they probably kept up an appearance of continuing their labor in strength- ening their works, while they were, also, preparing for an abandonment of them but no official record has come doAvn to us, concerning their doings, on that day. Having been strengthened by the addition of six fresh and effective Eegimeuts to his already powerful command. General Howe determined to attack the American lines, on the following day, [^Thursday, October 31 ; ] and, for that purpose, all necessary pre- parations were duly made ; but the preceding night and the morning of that day were very rainy ; and the proposed movement was necessarily postponed.* During the same day, ^Thursday, October 31,] the Americans remained within their works, quietly pre- paring for the abandonment of them and carefully watching every movement of their enemy. Supposing that one of the objects of General Howe was to turn the flank of the lines; to seize the bridge over the Croton-river ; and, thereby, to cut off the communication of the Army with the upper country. General Washington detached General Rezin Beall, with three fine Regiments of Marylanders, to occupy that very important pass; and General Lord Stirling was ordered, with the Brigade which he commanded, " to keep pace with the enemy's left flank, and to " push up, also, to Croton-river, should he plainly " perceive that the enemy's route lays that way." ^ At the same time that the Army was being rapidly diminished by the desertions of the Militia,'' to say nothing of stragglers,' those who remained at their 1 Vide page 253, ante. ^ Geiwral Hnire to Lord George Oennaine, New-York, 30 November, "177G;" [Hall's] Ilialonj of the Civil War in Ameriea, i., tWd ; Stednmn's History of the Awerican H a?-, i., 215 ; etc. 'How's Diimj, October 30; LtU-r frcm Uuiitenanl coionel Tilghman to his father, " White-Plains, 31 October, 1776." * General Rnwe to Lord George Germaine, " New York, 30 November, " 1776 ;" [Hall's] Histonj of the Civil War in America, i., 209 ; Stedman'e History of the American War, i., 215 ; etc. ^Lieutenant-colonel Tilghman to Willi^im Dtier, "White-Plains, Octo- "l)er31, 177r.." ''"Our Army is decreasing, fast: several gentlemen who have come " to Camp, within a few days, liave observed large numbers of Militia " returning home, on the different roads." — {Colonel Robert H. Harrison to the President of the Congress, " White-Plains, October 31, 1776.") "It" [o reinforcement,] "will arrive, very seasonablj', and in part "make up for the deficiency occasioned by daily desertions of our men, " who are returning to their homes in the most scandalous and infamous " manner. The roads are crowded with them." — {Colonel Robert H. Harrison to Governor Trumbull, "White-Plains, November 2, 1776.") ' " The General, in a ride he took, yesterday, to reconnoitre the " grounds about this, was surprised and shocked to find both Oflficers *' and Soldiers sliaggling all over tlie country, under one idle pretence "or other, when they cannot tell the hour or minute the Camp may be "attacked, and their services indispensably necessary. He once more "positively orders that neitlier Officer or Soldier shall stir out of Camp, "without leave:. . ."{General Orders, " Head-qvarW.rs, White " Plains, October 31,1776.") post were evidently diligently employed in preparing to move to a new position — an operation in which the great scarcity of teams added, very greatly, to the personal labor of the men^ — and, during the follow- ing night, that of Thursday, the thirty-first of Octo- ber," the entire line of the Army, taking the extreme left of the line for the pivot,'" swung back, from the lines which it had constructed, with so much labor, on the high grounds, above the Plains, until its rear rested on the more advantageous high grounds of Northcastle ; " within a mile from the position which it had abandoned ;'^ and authoritatively described as " grounds which were strong and advantageous, and " such as they," [e, in the meantime, disturbed by what ap- pears to have been written ambiguously. i^"Tlie left of our General's Division was not to move; but the re- "uiaiuder of his Division and all the other Divisions of the Army "were to fall back and form," on that stationery pivot, {Memoirs of Gnitral Heath, 70;) the whole occupying a new line, without having disturbed the relative positions of any of the Kegiments or Divisions of whom the Army was composed. 'I Gordon's History of the American Revolution, ii., 313, 344 ; Marshall's Life of George Washington, ii., 506 ; tieneral Hoive to Lord George Ger- main*, " New-York, 30 November, 1776;" [Hall's] History of the Civil War in America, i., 210; Stedman's History of the American War, i., 21G ; etc. 12 Hall and Stedman erronously supposed the new position was North of the Croton-river. General Howe, very accurately, stated it was "one "mile back from their entrenchments." Chief justice Marshall, as we have seen, erroneously supposed it was five miles from the White Plains. Hildreth, {History of the United States, iii., 154,) said it was two miles in the rear of the first line. Irving, {Lifeof George Washingtifti, ii., 397,) said it was five miles distant. Lossing, {Pictorial Field-hook of the Rero- Intion, ii., 823,) said, uncertainly, it was "toward tho Croton River." General Kno.\, in a letter written to his brother, dated " Near White- " Plains, .32 miles from New-York, 1 Nov. 1776," said "the enemy's "possession of this hill obliged us to abandon some slight lines thrown "np on the White Plains. This we did, this morning, [and retired to "some hills about half a mile in the rear." As the left of the former line did not move from the position which it had occupied since the twenty-second of October; and because the remainder of the Army, without disturbing the formation of the line, did no more than to swing back, on a pivot, into its new jiosition, the extreme right could not have been more than two miles distant from the former line, probably it was not much more than half that distance. 13 General Washington to the President of the Congress, " White-Plains, "6 November, 1776." See, also, Gor.lon's History of tlte American Revolution, ii., 344 ; Mar- shall's Life of Genrgi Washington, ii., 506 ; [Hall's] History of the Civil War in America, i., 210 ; Stedman's History of the American War, i , 216 ; etc. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1783. 451 which had been vacated ; ' and, during the night, it set fire to several barns and one house, which contained forage ; and some Provisions which, for the want of team-i, could not be removed, were also destroyed.'' On the morning after the withdrawal of the main body of the American Army from its lines, at the head of the Wliite Plains, \_Fridaij, Nocembcrl, 1776,] General Howe gave orders for the occupation of those lines, by the Royal Army ; but, again, a violent rain interposed; and the project was abandoned.^ At a later hour, however, the Hessian Grenadiers were moved from Chatterton's-hill, and occupied those lines,* very possibly as the beginning of a movement against the new position of the American Army, which, after a due examination of its strength, was conducted no further.* 1 Letter from a GenVeinan in the Army, '• Camp near the Mills, about " THREE MILES North OF THE White-Plains, November 1, 1770," puli- lislieked, "Was there not a time, at the White "Plains, when our .\riiiy lay on their arms, intending to attack the " enemy, but were prevented by rain?," to which he replied, " After "the enemy fell back to the heights, near Nortli-Castle, they left an "advance Corps on the heighls of the White Plains ; there were or- "dei's given for an attack of that Corps, which was prevented by a vi- "olentrain. We did not lay upon our anus." The inquiry was con- tinued by the ('oiiimittee asking, " From the situation of the relicl *' Army aiul of our's, was that siorni in their or our faces?" to which bie Lordship replied, I do not apprehend that the attack was pre* "vented by the storm of rain being in either of our faces; there are "other effects of a storm, hiicIi as s|H>iliiig the roads and preventing "the dr»v>'ing of artillery up steep hills." The Committee continued, by asking, " Whether if the jiowder was wet, on both sides, the at- " tacks might not have been made by bayonets ? ; " to which his Lord ship replied, " I do not recolh-i-t that I sjtiii the powrler was wet ;" and, there, the subject was droj^pwl. — (Alnion's I'urt inmentanj Register, Fifth Si-Bsiou of the Fourteenth ParliaUH nt of Great lirilain, xiii., 14.) * General Uoice to Lord George Gernudne, ■' Nkw-Yokk, aO November, " 1770." ' Although it was not stated, at the time, and notwithstanding it has not been stated, since that time, that General Howe proposed to attJick the Americans, in their new position, on the mjrning after it was taken by them, we are sure that that was his purpose, when he ordered the Hessian Grenadiers from Chatteiton"s-liiU ; and made the preparations for "drawing of artillery up steep hills," to w hich General Lord (^rnwallis referreil, in his testimony ; and ordered or approved the uiovenient on the extreme left of the .\merican lines, of which mention will be made, hereafter. Nothing else than such a i>roJect, it seems to us, could have warranted all these openttions ; and, certainly, nothing else could have leil some of the British writers, including Captain Hall, {History of the Civil War in America, i., 210,) to consider the occapation of the aban- doned lines, by the Hessian Grenadiers, as u pursuit of the fugitive Americans. On the morning of Friday, the first of November, simultaneously with the movement of the Hessian Grenadiers and with other equally important prepa- rations — the whole, we believe, preparatory to an as- sault on the new position of the American Army, in the high grounds of North Castle, — a heavy body, from the Right of the Royal Army, with a number of field-pieces, was moved against the extreme left of the American lines, where the Division commanded by General Heath was posted, and opened a heavy fire ; which was returned by Captain-lieutenant Bryant and Lieutenant Jackson, of the American Artillery, neither party sustaining any loss which was particu- larly worthy of record. " A violent rain, however, again interposed; and the project, whatever it may have been, was abandoned.' General Heath has left a very minute description of the movements of the enemy and of his own preparations to oppose those movements, {Memoirs of General Heath, 80, 81 ;) and we make room for it, because of its groat local interest, in the vicinity of the White Plains: "OurGen- "eral's first anxiety," General Ileatli stateil, speaking of himself, *' was " for Colonel Malcolm's Regiment, on the hill, to the East of the hollow, "on the left, lest the enemy should push a Column into the hollow, "and cut the Regiment off from the Division. He, therefore, ordered " Major Keith, one of his Aides, to gallop over, and order Colonel Mal- "colni to come off. immediately, with Lieutenant Feuno's Artillery , but, " upon a more critical view of the ground, in the hollow, (at the head "of which there was a heavy stone wall, well-situated to cover a body of "troops to throw a heavy fire directly down it, while an oblii|ue fire " could be thrown in, on both sides,) he ordered Major Pollard, his other "Aide, to gallop after Keith, and countermand the first order ; and to "direct the Odonel to remain at his post: and he should be supported. ■' A strong Regiment was ordered to the head of the hollow, to occupy "the wall. "The cannonade was brisk, on both sides, through which the two "Aides-de-camp passed, in going and returning. At this instant. Gen- "eral Washington rode up to the hill. His first question to our General, " was, ' How is your l)ivisi(jn ? ' He was answered, ' They are all in or- " ' der.' ' Have you,' said the Comlnander-iii chief, 'any troops on the hill, "' over the hollow? ' He was answered, ' Malcolm's Regiment is there.' ' If " 'you do not call them ofr,immPdiately,' says the General, 'you may lose " ' them, if the enemy push a column up the hollow.' He was answered, " ' that, even in that case, their retreat should be made safe : that a strong " Regiment was posted at the head of the hollow, behind the wall ; that " this Regiment, with the oblique fire of the Division, would so check the " enemy, as to allow Malcolm to make a safe retreat. Thry of the Atiiericiin Wur, i., 216 ; Memoirs of General Heath, 81 ; Gordon's llittoyy nf the American Revolution^ ii., 344 ; Marshall's Life of Geonje IVtishimjIon, ii., .^00, 5U7 , etc. ^ Memoirs of Genera! Heath, SX-Ki ; Letter dated " Ne.vu Head-Quau- "teks, Noutii-Castle, Nov. 5, 177tj," published in The JV«merty now occupied by the rcsi)ected widow of the late C. Halsey Mitchell — that portion of that property, indeed, which was occupied, so many years, for the Law-olficea of Minott Mitchell, Esq., so long the head of the Uar of Westcliester-county. General Orders of the Army, " nK.M>-gl AKTERS, Wmite-I'l.ms.'!, No- "vember 6,1776 ; " 'ITie Commitlie of Se subject to "the movements of the enemy and '■the circumstances of the American Army ;" and that three thousand men should be detailed to take post at Feekskill and the i»isses in the Highlands, for the delunce of those posts, for erecting fortiticntions, etc. 13 Geiieral Howe to Lord George Gennaine, " New-Yoek, 30 Xovetnber, "1776." ^* General McDougal to Colonel DelViU, " White-Pi.ains, November 7, "1776 ;" Memoirs of General lle^dh, 84. 1' General Howe to Lord George Germaine, " New-Y'ohk, 30 November, "1776." 1' General Washington to General Greene, "Head-qcabters, 8 November, "1776." 454 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of the line, which it had so honorably occupied ; and took up its line of march, towards Peekskill, where it was to be permanently posted, for the defense of the Highlands ; ' and, on Sunday, the tenth of November, General Washington left the White Plains, to take command of those troops who had crossed the Hud- son-river, and who, soon afterwards, were engaged in that disastrous retreat, through the Jerseys, and in that subsequent recovery of the greater part of that State, which so greatly distinguished him, as a com- manding General, and which have been recorded, with such entire approbation, on the pages of history.'^ General Lee was left at the White Plains, with his own Division and those commanded by Generals Spencer and Sullivan, generally New York and New England troops, with orders to watch the movements of the enemy ; to secure and carry off" the Stores ; and, then, to follow the main body of the Army, into the Jerseys.^ While General Washington and the main body of the American Army were thus falling back from their position, at North Castle, General Howe and the main body of the Royal Army continued to fall back and approach Kingsbridge. On Sunday, the tenth of November, a Brigade of Hessians was moved to that place, to increase the strength of General Knyphau- sen's already strong Division;* and, two days after- wards, [Tuesday, November 12,] the main body of the Royal Army broke up the encampment, at Dobbs's- ferry, which it had occupied since the preceding Wed- nesday, and, in two columns, moved towards Kings- bridge, resting, on the following day, [ Wednesday, November 13,] on the heights of Fordham, and form- ing a line, with the Right upon the road leading to the Borough Town of Westchester, and covered by the Bronx-river, and with the Left on the Hudson- river,^ where it remained, until the preparations for the assault on Fort Washington, wiiich had been rea- sonably determined on, had been completed.'' The progress of the Royal Army through West- ch ester-county was distinguished by the outrages which were inflicted on the inhabitants, without respect to persons or sexes, on both those who were entirely conservative and disposed to favor the Royal cause and those who were radically and actively opposed to it — as General Washington described them, while forewarning the Governor of New Jersey of what the fate of that people would be, "they have treated all, " here, without discrimination : the distinction of 1 Memoirs of Gaicral Heath, 84. 'General Washington to the President of the Congri/ss, 'Teekskill, 11 *' November, 1770." '^Instructions of General Washington to General Lee, "Head-quarters, "near THE White-Plains, 10 November, 1776;" Return of the Cunti- neutal Troops under the command of General Lee, "North-Castle, No- '■ vember 16, 1776 ;" Memoirs of General Heath, Si. * General Howe to Lord George Gennaine, "New- York, 30 November, " 1776." !■ General Howe to Lord George Germaine, '• New-York, 30 November, " 177« ;" [H ill's] History of the Civil War in America, i., 212 ; etc. o [Hall's] History of the Cicil War in America, i., 212. " Whig and Tory has been lost in one general sceni " of ravage and desolation." ' In that work, the Hes- sians and the British troops were equally notorious ; and what the soldiery spared, was frequently carried away by the soldiers' wives and mistresses, who formed a part of the retinue of the Army.* Indeed, the warmth of controversy called out from one of the most prominent Loyalists of that period, the following graphic description of the outrages inflicted by the King's troops: "The inhuman treatment alluded to, " was the indiscriminate plunder suffered to be com- " mitted, by the soldiery under his command, on "Staten Island, Long Island, the White Plains, and " in the Province of New .Tersey, where friend and " foe, loyalist and rebel, met with the same fate — a "series of continued plunder, which was a disgrace to "an Army pretending to discipline, and which, while " it tended to relax the discipline of the troops, could " not fail to create the greatest aversion, even in the "breast of loyalty itself, to a service which, under the " fair pretence of giving them orotection . robbed them, " in many instances, of even the necessaries of life." * But the sufferings endured by the inhabitants of Westchester-couiity were not confined to those which were produced by the outrages inflicted by the Royal Army and its followers. We have already alluded,'" incidentally, to the robberies of Horses which were inflicted on the farmers of that County, by Officers of the American Army, for their private uses, at their respective homes — not by the Rank and File, nor by the soldiers' wives and concubines, nor in a foreign country ; but by the Commissioned Officers of the Army of Americans who had been moved into the County, for the protection of the inhabitants and of their properties. To such an extent were those robberies of Horses, to be sent to the homes of the thieves, for their private uses, carried on, that, after several General Orders, bearing on the subject, had 1 General Washinglonto Governor Livingston, " WiinE-l'LAixs, 7 No- " vember, 1770." Ill a letter to Genenil Greene, written on the same day, the (ieiieral said, "Tliey," [the farmers, in Ni w Jersey,] "may rely upon it, that the " enemy wil Heave nothing they find anions them; nor do they dis- " criminate between Whig and Tory. Woful e.xperience Inui convinci d " the latter, in the niovenieiitsof the enemy, in this State, of this trnth." — (General Washington to General Greene, " Whitk-I'lai.vs, November 7, "1771-..") 8 "The people who remained in that part of the country," [Weslcliet- ter-couiily,] " through which they pass'd, have been most cruelly plun- " dered ; many helpless women had even their shifts taken from their " backs by the soldiers' wives, after the great plunderers had done ; and, " in this general ravage, no discrimination was made of Whig or Tory." (lA^Uer from Stamford, A&tei "12th Nov. 1776," published in The Free- man's Journal, or New-Hampshire Gazette, Vol. I., No. 28, Portsmouth, Tuesday, December 3, 1776.) f [Galloway's] lleply to the Observations of Lieut. Gen. Sir William Howe on a pamphlet entitled Letters to a Nobleman, 17, 18. On the general subject, see, also. General McDougal to Colonel De Witt, "White-Plains, 7 November, 1776;" Letter to a Gentleman in Virginia, " Head-quarters, White-Plains, November 8, 1776," iinli- lished in Force's American Archives, V., iii., 603 ; The Committee of Safety to the President of the Congress, " In Committee of Safety for the "State of New-Y'ork, Fishkill, November 20, 1776;" etc. 10 Vide pages 415, 416, ante. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1774-1Y83. 455 been issued, without having checked the career of robbery, General Washington was constrained to issue another, iu these words, sufficiently illustrative of the practices and of his views concerning them : " It is with a.stonishnient the General hears that some "Officers have taken Horses, between the enemy's " Camp and ours, and sent them into the country, for "their private use. Can it be possible that per- "sons bearing Commissions and fighting in such " a cause, can degrade themselves into plunderers of "Horses? He hopes every Officer will set his face "against it, in future; and does insist that the " Colonels and commanding Officers of Regiments im- " mediately inquire into the matter, and report to him " who have been guilty of these practices ; and that "they take an account of the Horses in their re- "spective encampments; and send to the Quarter- " master-general all that are not in some public " service." ' While some of the Officers of the American Army were thus employed in replenishing their own stables, at their respective homes, from the stables of the farmers of Westchester-county, others of that Army, Officers and Privates, were systematically visiting the houses of those farmers and robbing them of what- ever was acceptable to them. Like the British and Hessians, they were not respecters of either the friends of the American cause or those of the King ; nor did they hesitate to rob helpless and unprotected females and their families ; sometimes turning them out of their houses, undressed and in their night- clothes ; and, generally, adding personal abuse of their victims to the crime of robbing them. Nothing whatever was unacceptable to the thieves; and the bags of Feathers and of unmanufactured Wool, the Desks and Tea-tables and Chairs, the Book-cases and Books, the Andirons and brass and copper Kettles, the linen Curtains and Looking-glasses and women's Hat.s, the Churns and Washtubs, the sets of Sleigh- harness and skips of Bees, which appear recorded among the articles which were thus stolen by the soldiers whom JIassachusetts and Connecticut had sent into the Army, very clearly indicated that while the Horses of the farmers of Westchester-county were stolen for the supplying of the stables of the thieves, at their respective homes, the Household Furniture belonging to the same farmers, and the Clothing of their wives, and their unmanufactured Wool and Feathers, and their Bees, were also stolen for the purpose of enriching the homes and the work- rooms and the gardens of those same " Christian " New Englanders, and the wardrobes of their families. Among those who were thus robbed were Miles Oak- ley, who was the Landlord of the Tavern, contiguous to the Court-house, in the Village of the White Plains ; ' John Martina, the grandfather of the late > Gnural Onlen, " Head-qi'artf.iis, Wmitk-Plalns. <>ctob«'r 177r,." 'On page 68, ante, note 1, we referred to a Tavern, also contiguous to tlie Court-liouso, which, in .\pril, 1775, was said to liave l)een the Caleb Marline of Greenburgh and of the widow of the late Thomas Dean of Tarrytown, whose home- stead is now occupied by Isaac F. Van Wart, of Greenburgh ; Talman Pugsley, who is said to have lived where the brick School-house now stands, oppo- site to the residence of Abraham Beare, of Green- burgh; Ph(L>be Oakley, who was the sister-in-law of Talman Pugsley ; Marmaduke Foster, who was the son-in-law of John Martine ; and Solomon Pugsley and the widow Elizabeth Pugsley, whose places of residence are not known to us ; and their Depositions and Statements and the Schedules of the articles stolen from John Martine and his son in-law, afford, at once, the evidence of the robberies and of the com- forts which were to be found in the homes of the quiet and industrious and intelligent residents of Westchester-county, at that time.' Among the thieves whose names have come down to us, were Major Bacon, Captains Gale, Shaddock, and Ford, and others, of Colonel Brewer's Regiment of Artificers, of the Massachusetts Line ; and Officers and Privates of the Regiment of Connecticut troops, commanded by Colonel Charles Webb.* In view of these great outrages, and of many others of which no records have been preserved, the Com- mittee of Safety for the State addressed a letter to the President of the Continental Congress, in which are these concluding words : " I have the satisfaction " to assure you that the fortitude of this State and " their zeal for the glorious cause in which we are " engaged, is not abated ; on the contrary, we are " prepared to meet even severer misfortunes, with a " spirit and firmness becoming the generous advo- nieeting-placo of Lewis Morris and his friends ; to liave been liept by Isaac Uttkley ; and to Imve stood until about 1808, when it was burned. Unless tliere were two Taverns, in the White Plains, with Oakleys for their Landlcjrds, in 1775 and 1771! ; or, unless Miles had succeeded Isaac, as the Lamllord of the one Tavern which was " Oakley's "Tavern," between April, 1775, and Xoveniber, 1770, we were probably in error, in ouv former statement, concerning the imine of the Oakley who was the Landlord of that Tavern which was, there, mentioned: and if only one "Oakley's Tavern" was in existence, in the White Plains, at that time, it was among the buildings which were burned by Major Austin, on the filth of November, 1776, (i i'de pages 452, 453, ante ;) and, therefore, was not standing until 1868, as stated on page 244. We have not been able to ascertain the facts ; and so leave the matter iu doubt. 3 Petition of Miles Oakley to General Washimjlon, " November 9, 1776 ; " Deposition of John Murtine and Memorandutn of Goods plnmlercd from him, "dated November 13, 177G " ; Deposition of Talman I^sley, "dated "the second day of I>ecember, 1776 " ; Petition of Phoebe Oakletj to the C«n- vention of New- York, and her Deposition, ' ' dated the second of December, "1776" ; Deposition of Mnrvmflvke Foster and a List of Articles taken by the sttldiers, from him, "dated the thirteenth of November, 1776" ; Re- lease, by Stephen Oakley, " in behalf of Solomon Piujsley and the teiJow '•Elizabeth Pugsley, to Captain Ford, "for the things that said Captain "Ford and his men did take out of the house of Solomon Pugsley, near " the lines of the enemy, at White Plains, on Philips's Manor ; " etc. No more interesting jMipers, connected with the history of that period and illustrative of the morality and integrity of New Knglanders of the era of the Revolutionary War, can be found, anywhere, tliau these. * Depositions of Phtihe Oakley, John Martine, Tatman Pngsley, and Marmaduke Foster ; Helease, by Sleplten Oakley to Captain Ford ; Deposition of Ebenezer Biorill, "dated the second day of December, 1776 " ; etc. 456 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " cates for Liberty. Unhappily am I to add, that, " amidst all our suffering, the Army employed for " the protection of America have not refrained from " embittering even the calamities of War. At a " time when the utmost resources of this State were " laid open to their wants, and the members of Con- " vention personally submitted to the labour and " fatigue which were necessary, on a sudden emer- " gency, and after frequent losses of Provisions and " Barracks, to supply two numerous Armies, aug- " mented by the Militia, with every article which " they required, the Court-house and the remains of " the Village, at the White Plains, which had been " spared, on the retreat of our forces, was, after the " enemy had, in their turn, retired, wantonly de- " stroyed, without the Orders and to the infinite re- " gret of our worthy General. Besides, in spite of " all his Excellency's efforts, wherever our troops " have marched or been stationed, they have done " infinite damage to the possessions and farms, and " have pilfered the property of the people. " I am directed. Sir, to submit it to the honourable " Congress, whether some effectual remedy ought " not to be provided against such disorderly and dis- " graceful proceedings. The soldier who plunders " the country he is employed to protect, is no better " than a robber, and ought to be treated accordingly ; " and a severe example ought, in the opinion of the " Committee, to be made of the Officer who, without " necessity or his General's permission, set fire to the " Court-house and other buildings, at the White " Plains. He is guilty of the crime of Arson ; and if " he cannot be punished by the Articles of War, he " ought to be given up to the Laws of the land. If " so glaring a violation of every sentiment of human- " ity should be passed over, in silence, if the Army " is not seasonably restrained from such acts of bar- " barity, the consequence must be fatal to the cause " of a people whose exalted glory it is to be advocates " for the Rights of Mankind against the tyranny and " oppression of lawless power." ' The conduct of General Washington, in the trying events of that memorable Campaign, in Westchester- county, has received the unqualified approbation of his country and of the world, and secured for him the highest honors, as a Soldier and as a commanding General. The conduct of General Howe, during the same Campaign, received nothing else than the ap- proval of the King, his step-brother, and that of the party of the Opposition, in the Parliament, of which he was a member, and which was, peculiarly, the party who was in sympathy with America. Both the Admiral and the General, commanders, respectively, of the King's Fleet and Army, were ac- cused, by the Press of Great Britain and in the Par- 1 The Cammitlee of Safety to the President of the Congress, "In Commit " TKE or Safety for the State of New- York, Fishkii.i,, November " 20, 1776." liament, with want of wisdom, in the formation of their plans ; and with want of vigor and energy, in the execution of those plans.^ " A connection with "the Opposition, and a resolution, assumed before " their departure from England, to frustrate every "measure of the " [prech of Geueral Howe before the Committee of the House of Com- mniit, April 29, 1779 — .Mmon's Pnrliameiitary Beijitler, Fifth Session, Fuurteentb Parliament of Great Britain, xii.,324. S<*, also, The Nara- tion of this history aud has contributed to it material that is unique both in its character and importance. 'In the Indian language, Manak^tditnitieuks — "the place where they all got drunk" — so called by the Indians, says that indefatigable chronicler John F. Watson, in commemoration of their first meeting with Captain Hudson, when that celebrated man made them acquainted with the peculiar effects of strong drink, which according to the tradition handed down to their descendants by these unsophisticated savages, "produced staggering and happy feeling." — ^^'ntson's " Xew York in Ihe Olden Tim$." and the black fire-bricks of the kiln were laid alter- nating with red or yellow ones to make checks on the gable front." Mrs. Van Cortlandt sketches the houses of the middle class and farmers, which, she says, were of rough stone when they were not of brick. She adds : " The windows were filled in with small panes of glass ; the heavy wooden outside shutters swung upon massive iron hinges. They had usually a crescent cut near the top to admit the early light, and were held back by an iron somewhat in the shape of an S inserted in the stone wall. As ground was cheap, these houses were large in extent and com- monly a story and a half in height, the roof sloping steejjly from the ridge pole, and dormer windows broke its uniformity. Double-pitched houses were of later date, as were those in the interior of the county shin- gled on the sides as well as on the roof. The front door was invariably divided into halves ; in the upper half were two bull's eyes of glass to light the hall, and it was graced with a heavy brass knocker. The lower half had a heavy latch. A wide piazza surrounded the house. In the villages a front stoop was common, with benches on each side. Here the families took their evening rest and the neighbors discussed the questions of the day. The houses mostly had a southern exjjosure. Attached to them was usually an extension for the kitchen and the use of the servants, which was generally built of brick. Many bricks were brought from Holland, but these extensions or wings were most frequently built of rough bfick from the kilns on the Hudson River, of which early men- tion is made. " In houses of much size the rooms were often wainscoted to the height of about three feet, or a chair board (a beveled moulding) ran about the same height from the floor. Sometimes the wainscot was carved, as well as the paneling about the deep wooden seats and the mantel-pieces. The fire-places occupied a large space, in some very old houses being placed cornerwise. Tiles, usually of Scripture scenes, adorned the fire-places. Some were of quite fine ware, entirely white, as in the Van Cortlandt Manor- house, where one or two were spared by the soldiers when removing the rest to use as plates. The fire- irons, fender and andirons were of solid brass and always as brilliant as hands could make them, forming with the fire a perfect picture, but alas for those who in biting winter days could not get close to that fire ! " As the colony grew stronger the Dutch scattered farther in the interior and luxury invaded the towns which they and the other settlers founded along the Hudson. As they built better houses they made or imported fine furniture for them, but the earlier equipments of the living rooms were as rude in char- acter as scant in number. The pallet on the floor — " the Kermis bed," as the Dutch called it — was an occasional resort, even in good houses. The Labadist travelers in 1688 sojourned in a tavern near the Hud- son that put its guests to sleep on a horse bedding of MANNERS AND CUSTOMS. 459 hay before the fire ; and a hundred years later Cha- teaubriand found an inn on the New York frontier where everybody slept about a central post that up- held the roof, heads outward and feet toward the cen- tre. This was the manner common in England in King Alfred's day, thirteen centuries ago. Such poor people in the colonies as possessed tastes too luxuri- ous to enjoy a deer-skin on the hearth, were accus- tomed to fill their bed-sacks and pillows with fibrous mistletoe, the down of the cat-tail flag, or with feath- ers of pigeons slaughtered from the innumerable migrating flocks. Cotton from the milk-weed, then called " silk grass," was used for pillows and cush- ions. No contrast could be sharper than that between such primitive accommodations and the elegance which marked the manor-houses, which were the pride of the colony. The patroons, and indeed all the landed proprietors, gloried in the solid magnifi- cence of their household appurtenances. Mrs. Van Cortlandt has written of these stately houses so graphically that pictures of them may be recreated in the mind's eye from her description : " The fur- niture of well-to-do people was massive and costly and that of the plainer classes good and made to last. Large sideboards were loaded with silver beakers, tankards, candlesticks and mugs. The latter were used at funerals to hold mulled wine. In Albany it was the custom to borrow these mugs of all the rela- tives and return them after the funeral filled with the fragrant compound, and doubtless this was also done in Westchester. The sideboards also held in- laid mahogany boxes, which contained the spoons and forks. A cellaret of mahogany bound in brass and lined with metal was the receptacle of the wine bottles. Heavy old mahogany chairs, with leather bottoms, and massive tables, whose leaves let down, completed the furniture of the dining-room. The cupboards set in the walls held china, which was of- ten very beautiful, especially that of the favorite Lowe- stoffe and Chinese makes. The glassware was finely cut, and some of the goblets had stems adorned with spiral threads of opaque glass. Pewter platters, plates, dishes and mugs were in daily use. ' "The bed-room furniture embraced an enormous four-post bedstead, the posts handsomely carved and supporting a canopy or tester hung with dimity or fringed chintz curtains and a fringed valance to match.* A sacking bottom was pierced at intervals 1 These pewter utensils were highly valued. One man, in 1690, leaves to his wife "her bed and some small reversions of pewter," and to his daughter " two great charges of pewter, two pewter platters next to them, two lesser platters, a flaggon and a cow." A widow, in 1688, re- linipiislies her thirds in favor of her two sons, who promise her a certain yearly allowance— "only her wearing clothes, witli her bed and what belonged to it and her ptweter— those to remain to her and to be at her disposal."— //i«(-)ry of Itije b>/ Hev. Cluti. W. TInird. - One must have slept in a Dutch bed to understand the bliss or agony resulting from its peculiar arrangement. Going to bed in this case is a science. Tlie first difficulty for a novice is to let himself drop into the with large holes, worked with coarse linen thread in button-hole stitch. Through these orifices a stout rope was inserted and drawn around the correspond- ing pegs in the bedstead by strong hands, and upon this foundation great feather beds were piled. In the guest chamber, over the blankets and sheets was spread a white quilt, which was often a work of art, so beautifully was it quilted and so well were roses and tulips delineated by the needle upon its surface. The small wash-stands were frequently three-cor- nered, and the ware they held was usually dark blue and white. Venetian blinds shaded the windows, and were very troublesome because of the entangling of the cords which raised and lowered them. A large stufied chair, covered with chintz or dimity, was an indispensable piece of furniture, as was also a bright brass warming-pan. After a while great tin-plate stoves warmed the bed chambers, the Frank- lin stoves being reserved for the parlors and sitting- rooms. OLD STYLE SILVER TEA SERVICE. " The toilet table was usually of wood, in half-moon shape, the top covered with linen or muslin beauti- fully quilted. I have such a cover, veiy artistically worked with oak leaves and acorns. Sometimes the bed and window-curtains were of chintz, worked with birds and flowers never known to nature. One set yet preserved represents Fame with a trumpet hovering over Washington, upon whose brow she is placing a laurel wreath. The curious and, in some cases, very beautiful blue and white counterpanes, still to be found in old houses, were woven at a fac- tory in the interior of Westchester County. Infants very middle of the feathery mass, on hit bat-k ; he sinks and the soft masa closes round him, leaving but a longitudinal strip of his body exposed. Now comes the last and most difficult act. By an adroit twist of his wrist he m>ist bring the narrow down coverlet right over the aperture ; if he succeeds he soon falls into blissful oblivion ; if he fails he will feel for the remainder of the night as though he were lying in a bed of hot ashes and having iced water poured over hini. The " sinap band," or " bunk," was an humbler style of bedsteail in use, buc it had also its bed of live-geese feathers. 460 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. were put to rest in heavy mahogany cradles, which had a sort of roof extending over the head to shield the child's eyes from the light. " The parlors or drawing-rooms were laid with Turkey carpets, and round mirrors hung on the walls. They were topped with brass eagles, and fitted with branches for holding the wax candles used by the rich. Other mirrors were oblong, and divided by a gilt moulding about a foot and a half from the top. In some cases the upper division was of glass ; but more frequently it held a picture. I have one the upper compartment of which displays a group of military weapons, drums, etc., with a female figure mourning the death of Washington. Mantel glasses were separated into three divisions by strips of nar- row gilt moulding. Small tables, with claw feet holding a ball, were used, and mahogany stands, with tops that turned ; these could be placed in the corners to occupy very little room. " Tall eight-day clocks in mahogany or ebony and gilt frames were found in all house- holds of the better class. One that was stolen from the Van Cortlandt manor-house during the Revolution was cased in gilded ebony, and above its face was a painting of the Queen of Sheba on her way to lay her gifts at the feet of King Solo- mon. If these big time-pieces were not decorated with a fig- ure-painting, a marine view or a landscape, they bore the sun and moon between the dial and the top of the frame. "At the entertainments of the rich the tables fairly groaned under their weight of viands, fowl, fish, oysters and clams burdened them, while the choice wines tickled the palates of connoisseurs. Perhaps they favored none more than the renowned vintage of the south side of the island of Madeira. For a more potent drink they resorted to ' rack punch,' a concoction in which the strong arrack was the principal ingredient. Toasts were drunk at all dinners, the gentlemen pro- posing the ladies and the ladies the gentlemen. " There was plenty of employment for sportsmen. Wild turkeys, pheasants, quail and other feathered game abounded, and Cooper tells us that as late as 1755 ' nothing was easier than to knock over a buck in the Highlands.' The negroes were uniformly good shots, and used pointers and setters when hunting. " The kitchen fire-places were of huge size. A large back-log was rolled into the yawning cavity by the unit- ed power of stout men-servants, and on the massive iron andirons hickory and other wood was piled, while the whole fiery mass was kept in place by a heavy fore- " grandfather's " CLOCK. All sorts of meats. stick. The iron shovel and tongs seemed fit for the use of giants. Before these leaping flames and glow- ing logs stood, in the morning, a ponderous tin ' Dutch oven,' on whose spear-like spit revolved a turkey, a saddle of mutton or a roast of beef. The spit was turned by one of the many little darkeys who peopled the kitchen of every great homestead. In a corner of the fire-place stood, on thick squat legs, a bake-pot, filled with a savory mess, and its iron lid covered with hot embers. From beneath the chimney-piece swung the crane, whose long, horizontal arm bore a profusion of pot-hooks and trammels, from which depended innumerable pots, long-handled frying-pans and other paraphernalia of the cuisine. But no kitchen utensil was more unique than the wooden bowls which the Indians fashioned from the knots of the maple tree and sold to the house-keepers. Scoured to immaculate whiteness, they had their place in every family and were highly prized. " At Christmas and other holiday seasons the stu- pendous brick ovens, without which no gentleman's house could be thought thoroughly equipped, would be filled three times a day — first with generous loaves of wheat and rye, then with chicken and game pas- tries, and lastly with the succulent mince, apple and cranberry pies. " A necessary labor in spring and autumn was the making, or dipping, of tallow candles. Six cotton wicks would be doubled over a rod, then dipped in the melted tallow and drawn between the manipu- lator's finger and thumb until the tallow gained some consistency. The rod was hung up while the candles dried and a' second dipping and drawing finished the work. Presently some unknown genius invented a frame that held thirty-six wicks, and eight or ten such frames made the labor quick and easy of perform- ance. Tin molds were employed when a small supply of candles was needed, and the big box of ' dips ' near- ly empty. Mr. Jesse Ryder, of Ossining, says that at one time cotton was so high priced that tow was used for wicks, and the ' dips ' gave a poor light. Candle- sticks for the kitchen were cut from large, square wooden blocks. "'^Killing time' was a country festival- Before Christmas the oaken lard kegs and the capacious beef and pork casks were cleaned. Then the hogs and cattle were slaughtered, and abundant supplies of souse, sausage, hams, jowls, bacon, pork and beef laid away. Curing occupied much time with the rude implements of the day. Sausage meat cut into half- inch pieces was thrown into wooden boxes two and a-half or three feet long by ten inches deep, where men armed with spades ground to a razor-edge, chopped it into tiny fragments. By the help of a small tin tube, it was packed in small linen bags, or casings, as they were called. " Soap-making was an occupation of the spring. Great leach tubs standing out of doors on high frames were filled with wood ashes, on which water MANNERS AND CUSTOMS. 4G1 was slowly poured to i)roduce lye, and the work of soap-boiling began. To be perfect soft-soap, it must be ' white as snow and thick as liver.' " Matches were not known ; so the tinder-box, with its flint and charred linen rag, did duty. When ill- ness was in the household, or the nursery needed a light, a minute wax taper floating in a wine-glass filled with sperm oil provided a faint ilhimination. Sperm oil lamps came into use very much later." Washington Irving brought out with fine detail many features of the old Dutch social life. In his facetious notices of New York in the early colonial days he merely made fictitious personages to move amid actual scenes. His " Knickerbocker " is made to say of the " grand parlour :" " In this sacred apartment no one was permitted to enter, excepting the mistress and her confidential maid, who visited it once a week for the purj)ose of giving it a thorough cleaning and putting things to rights, always taking the precaution of leaving their shoes at the door, and entering lightly on their stocking feet. After scrub- bing the floor and sprinkling it with fine white sand, which was curiously stroked into angles and curves with a broom ; after washing the windows, rubbing and polishing the furniture, and putting a new bunch of evergreens in the fire-place, the window-shutters were again closed to keep out the flies, and the room carefully locked up, until the revolution of time brought round the weekly cleaning day. "As to the family, they always entered in at the gate, and most generally lived in the kitchen . . . The fire-places were of a truly patriarchal magni- tude, where the whole family, old and young, master and servant, black and white, nay, even the cat and dog enjoyed a community of privilege, and each a right to a corner. " In these primitive days, a well-regulated family always rose with the dawn, dined at eleven and went to bed at sundown." Our frugal ancestors were averse, it seems, to giving dinners, but the wealthier classes " that is to say, such as kept their own cows^ and drove their own wagons," gave tea-parties. On these occasions the company assembled about three o'clock, and went away at six — even earlier in winter- time. " Knickerbocker " describes these parties, — " The tea was served out of a majestic delft tea-pot, ornamented with paintings of fat little Dutch shep- herds and shejiherdesses tending pigs, with boats sailing in the air, and houses built in the clouds, and sundry other ingenious Dutch fantasies. The beaux distinguished themselves by their adroitness in re- plenishing this pot, from a huge copper tea-kettle, which might make the beaux of the present day sweat merely to look at it ! To sweeten the beverage, a lump of sugar was laid beside each cup, and the company alternately nibbled and sipped with great decorum." In such parties propriety and dignity of deportment prevailed ; " the young ladies seated themselves demurely in their rush-bottomed chairs. and knit their own woolen stockings, speaking but little, and chiefly in brief answers to questions put to them, few and far between. As to the gentlemen, each of them tranquilly smoked his pipe, and seemed lost in contemplation of the blue and white tiles with which the fire-places were decorated, wherein sundry passages of Scripture were piously por- trayed." The dress of the people varied with their fortunes and the change from the log cabin epoch to that of the wealthy and courtly inhabitants of the broad manors. The men who first adventured into the woods learned from the Indians to wear dressed skins and moccasins, but with those of the towns and farm- steads their ambition, as well as that of their women- folk, was to dress in the manner of "the best fashion at home." Long hair was universal in the days be- fore periwigs. Cutting the hair short was the brand of disgrace and the mark of identification aflixed to a servant who ran away before his term of indenture BEXJAMIX franklin's CREAM-POT. had expired. Puritanism was somewhat successful in its fight against long hair, but when the periwig re-appeared, in the reign of Charles II., it proved too enticing for human vanity to resist. It probably suc- cumbed at length to the very completeness of its vic- tory. Not only men of dignity wore it, but many humbler men followed their example. " One finds," says Mr. Eggleston, " half-fed country schoolmasters in wigs ; tradesmen also proceeded to shave off their natural hair and don the mass of thread, silk, horse- hair or women's hair, with which wigs of various kinds were compounded. Apprentice lads under twenty are described in advertisements of runaways lis wearing wigs ; hired servant^ aped the quality, and transported rogues were tricked out in wigs to make them marketable." After 1750 the decline of the ' wig began, but the natural hair was curled, frizzled. 462 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. powdered, queued and clubbed.' The rage for grow- ing the longest possible switch of hair infected all classes ; sailors and boatmen wrapjjed in eelskin their cherished locks, and the back countryman was accustomed to preserve his by enveloping it in a piece of bear's gut dyed red, or clubbing it in a buckskin bag. Women wore the lofty " tower " or " com- mode" head-dress, which, in the exaggeration that preceded its abolition, usually exceeded in its height the length of the face below it. The Dutch dames did not fall victims to any of the eccentricities of fashion ; but with their close-fitting caps, velvet bod- ices, short and voluminous skirts — the muslin petti- coats crisp and stiff with starch — the household keys hanging from their girdles and their capacious pock- ets filled with scissors, pin-cushion and other domes- tic tools, made a stubborn fight against the encroach- ments of the female dandyisms imported from across the Atlantic. In course of time the homespun linsey became the ordinary wear in the farmers' homes, but up to the opening of the Revolutionary epoch "My Lady of the Manor " luxuriated in costumes that rivaled the extreme modes of European aristocratic cir- cles. She might be a year late in adopting them, but she was not responsible for their delay in reaching her, and there are certain cotemporary records which leave no doubt in the mind that she and her daughters were not backward even in adopt- ing and continuing the ultra decollete gowns which the Stuart Restoration made indispensable to an Eng- lish fashionable woman. They embraced themselves in the cruel stays that comj)ressed their figures into the wasp-like waist then the object of foolish admira- tion, and tilted themselves forward on the pinching and high-heeled shoes, which had passed from Louis Quatorze to Charles II., and thence to the colonies. The stalwart and heroic impulses which united the colonies In their revolt against the British monarchy penetrated all classes of society, and as the crisis ap- proached dress became simpler and the great ladies co-operated with their lords to represent in their own persons the economy and plainness which typified the coming era of war and republicanism. As to the women in their homes, Mrs. Van Cort- landt has to say, — " Knitting was an art much cultivated, the Dutch women excelling in the variety and intricacy of the stitches. A knitting sheath, which might be of silver or of a homely goose quill, was an indispensable uten- sil to the dame, and beside it hung a ball pin-cushion. Crewel work and silk embroidery were fashionable, and surprisingly pretty effects were produced. Every little maiden had her sampler, which she began with 1 The Assembly of New York resolved September 9, 1730, that a tax of three shillings be laid " on every inhabitant, resident or sojourner, young or old, within the colony, that wears a wig or peruke made of human or horse hair mixed, by whatever denomination the panie may be distinguished." — " HUlm: 3Ing." vol H., Xo. 12, December, 1878. the alphabet and numerals, following them with a Scriptural text or verse of a metrical psalm. Then the fancy was let loose on birds, beasts and trees. Most of the old families possessed framed pieces of embroidery, the handiwork of female ancestors, some of which can stand comparison with the Kensington productions of this day. Flounces and trimmings for aprons, worked with delicately tinted silks on muslins, were common. The hand painting of strips of trimming for dresses is not a modern art. I have several yards of fine muslin painted in the early days with full-blown thistles in the approj^riate colore. Fringe looms were in use and cotton and silk fringe was woven. The former was used for the fine dimity wrappers worn in the morning. These garments were trimmed with cotton inserting and a cotton cord and tassels confined them at the waist. Chintz, usually of East India manufacture, with vivid colors on a white ground, was in vogue, and made up into a sack and petticoat. Large and showy patterns of flowers and buds prevailed. " For fiill dress, brocades and moire antique were worn. The robe of a bride in 1748 was of moire an- tique with a long train, the sleeves coming to the elbow. The bosom and sleeves were trimmed with lace, headed by a narrow pinked ruffle of the silk. The exquisitely quilted petticoat came from Holland, as did the clocked silk stockings, a present to the bride. Canton crape, levantine, lutestring silk and other silks were worn by the ladies. Leno, a muslin with a very open mesh, was used for trimming. Dainty half handkerchiefs, with narrow embroidered borders of gold or silver thread, were worn as fichus. Powder was in general use and the hair was dressed on high rolls in front and tied behind in a sort of bag- shaped queue. Aprons much trimmed and embroid- ered were a part of full dress, and hoops were also in vogue. Slippers of silk and kid had immensely high heels, sloping to the instep, and it is a marvel how the wearers balanced themselves. Fortunately, the dance they favored was the slow and stately Minuet. Necklaces were mostly made of heavy gold beads, plain or carved. Fans were very large and handsome. Here and there in old families still are seen very beautiful chatelaines, from which hung the watch and seals. " When calves were killed for family use, the skins were tanned and kept until the peripatetic shoemaker, who traveled through the country, made his annual visit, when he halted long enough to make shoes for the elders, the children and the servants. The tail- oress, too, made yearly or semi-yearly visits and un- dertook to turn the homespun cloth into garments. The coming of the mantua-maker, with her European patterns, created a lively stir among the matrons and maidens. Sewing in those days was done with fine linen thread, that even yet defies time and wear to destroy it." Among the Dutch, the opulent burghers compared MANNERS AND CUSTOMS. 463 to their wives and daughters as the peacock does to the hen. The women's dress was sober, but the men's many coats, their silk and velvet small-clothes, their silver buttons ' and fine linen stood for a good deal of money in each individual instance. The English colonial gentlemen did not stint themselves, but kept as close to the models of the London tailors iis time and distance would permit. Lacking any other ex- emplar for such display, they could find one in the €quii)ment3 of the British officers stationed in New York. Captain Cresar Carter, who was stationed there in 1692, was the envied possessor of a wardrobe which cost nearly a thousand dollars outside of his military accoutrements. Jacques Cosseau, a mer- chant who was a bankrupt before his death, in 1682, possessed but three old coats, the same number of old shirts, two pair of worn-out breeches and one neck- cloth ; but Dr. Jacob De Lange, a prosperous profes- sional gentleman, rejoiced in this sort of wardrobe, — Valuation. £ ». d. One gros. grained cloak, lined with silk 2 10 One Mack broad cloth coat 1 10 One black broad cloth suit 1 5 One colored serge suit (the new suit v\ith silver buttons) 5 One colored cloth waistcoat, with silver buttons. ... 1 40 Three silk drawers 2 Two calico Jniwera 2 6 Three white dmwei-s GO Two silk night caps 4 One pair jellow hand gloves with black silk fringe . . 14 Five pair of white calico stockings 9 One i>air black worsted stockings 4 One i>air gray worsted stockings 5 One coat lined with red serge 1 15 Two old coats 1 10 One fine black hat, one old gray hat, one black hat. . . 1 10 One black gros-grained suit 1 17 Mrs. De Lange was a fashionable lady, well -known to the families along the Hudson in 1685. Here is the appraisement of her costumes and their accessories : Valuation. £ «. d. One under petticoat, with a body red-bay 17 One under petticoat, scarlet 1 15 One red cloth petticoat, with black lace 2 15 One 8tri|)«d stuff petticoat 1 8 One colored drugget petticoat, with red lining 16 One colored drugget petticoat, with gray lining .... 16 One do do do do .... 6 One do do do white lining 10 One do do do do .... 8 One do do do do with pointed lace 8 One black silk petticoat, with ash gray silk lining ... 1 00 One black pottofoo petticoat, with black silk lining. . . 2 15 One black pottofoo petticoat, with taffeta lining. . . .1 13 One black silk potoso-a-samare, with lace 3 One black tartanel saniare, with a tucker 1 10 > Silver buttons and buckles marked every gentleman's costume. The plate silver buttons, made of Spanish dollars and smaller coins, which flourished in England in the days of Qiieen Anne, were worn in Amer- ica. Wl full dress for gentlemen required knee and shoe-buckles, which were of silver or, for great occasions, of paste, artistically set in blue enamel and gold, and costing one hundred dollars the pair. Ttie busi- ness of the dealer in buckles was as important as that of the hair-dresser or the maker of stays. i «. (I. Three flowered calico saniare 2 17 Three calico night gowns, two flowered, one red. ... 70 One silk waistcoat, one red calico waistcoat 14 One pair bodice 4 Five [lair white cotton stockings 9 Three black love-hoods 5 One white love-hooil 2 6 One black silk crape saniare, with a tucker 1 10 Two pair sleeves, with great lace 1 30 Four cornet caps, with lace, one without lace 3 One black silk rain cloth 10 One yellow love-hood 10 One black plush mask 16 One embroidered purse with a silver bugle and chain to the girdle, a silver hook and eye 1 4 Five small East India boxes 1 6 Five hair curlings 7 Four yellow love drowlas 2 Jeuelri/. One silver thread wrought small trunk 3 wherein are the following: One pair black pendants, with gold hooks 10 One gold lioat, wherein thirteen diamonds to one white coral chain 16 One pair gold stiicks or pendants, in each ten dia- monds 25 Two diamond rings 24 One gold ring, with a clap beck 12 One gold ring, or hoop, bound round with diamonds . 2 10 Mr. Samuel Leete, clerk of the Court of Mayor and Aldermen in 1679, who is styled " a literary gentle- man," was worth £23 10s. in garments and furniture. Cornelius Steenwyck, " one of the principal merchants and leading citizens of New Amsterdam," who died in 1686, kept the following enviable total of chattels in the " great chamber " of his house : Valuation . £ ». ((. Pl.ite of all kinds, 723 ounces 216 Different species of money 300 Gold chain, gold metal, gold child's whistle 49 One cloth coat, silver buttons 4 15 One stufl' coat, silver plate buttons 4 00 One black coat and breeches 2 00 One pair cloth breeches 10 One cloth coat, gimp buttons 2 10 One black cloth coat 2 10 One black velvet coat, old 3 One colored stuff coat and breeches 1 10 One silk coat, breeches and doublet 1 5 One silver cloth breeches and doublet 6 One old velvet waistcoat, with silver lace 15 One old coat, silver plate buttons 2 30 Six pieces of clothes, as coats, breeches and doublets .... 2 50 One buff coat and silk sleeves 1 10 One yellow silk scarf, with silver fringes 1 5 One light-colored gros green closk 1 00 One dark-coloreil gros green cloak, with lining 2 5 One cloth-coloren)id. * Letter of Lor.1 Bellomont, in Doc. rel. to Colonial Hist, of N. Y., quoted by Rev. (,'. W. Baird. acts of its members was to send, through this office, threatening letters to the leading members of the Tory party. Mr. James Rees, from whose " Foot-prints of a Letter-Carrier" we have quoted the above paragraph, says : " Nor was it until 1732 that the first stage-route to Philadelphia was established ; stages also departed for Boston monthly, taking a fortnight on the route." Advertisements of that year mentioned the departure of the post "in order to perlbrm his stage," but we find no reference to " stage-wagons" or " stage-coaches" before 1756, when the" first stage-coach'' is announced to run between Philadelphia and New York, " three days through." In 1753, William Vandrills informed "gentlemen and others who have a mind to transport themselves, wares or merchandise from New York to Philadelphia," that he has "fitted a stnye boat," which will "sail from New York to Amboy and thence by wagons to Burlington, and thence take passage to Philadelphia." In 1765 a rival of the " First Stage- Coach " put on the line a " covered Jersey wagon," — an improvement, it seems, on the other "coach." Competition was roused, and in the following year (1766) a third stage, yclept "The Flying-Machine," proposed to make the trip in two days, and allured travelers with the promise of " good wagons and seats on springs." Through fare, twenty shillings. When the capital of the province had accomplished no more during a century as regards traveling facili- ties, it could hardly be expected that Westchester County was able to boast of superior accommodations. Public travel was in its infancy : the hardy colonist bestrode his own good horse and started on a distant journey with no more concern than we board a rail- road train nowadays. After the Revolution, however, there was a marked and general improvement. A stage line was begun, in 1785, between New York and Albany. In 1787 stage communication with Boston was had three times a week in summer and twice a week in winter, and the towns in Westchester County had a stage from New York City every other day. It will be readily imagined that the mails did not carry tons of printed matter, as in our time. The first newspaper printed in New York was the yew York Gazette, a weekly, established by William Brad- ford, in 1725. It was printed on a half-sheet of fools- cap. The type was large and much worn. The first daily paper. The New York Daily Advertiser, published by F. Child & Co., only made its appearance in 1785. Westchester had no newspaper until after the Revo- lution, but its people not only read the New York journals, but also advertised in them. Here are some advertisements inserted by the people of Rye, and preserved in Mr. Baird's history of that town : "Oct. 23, 1749. W«>. Bl ETlS, Hat-Maker, Now living at Harrison's Pnichiise, in Rye, carries on the Hatter's Trade there, and makes and sells as good Hats a« any in the Province, for ready Jloney, or short Credit. Wm. Bvbtis." 472 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. "July 3, 1775. Stolen out of the pasture from the subscriber at K.ve the 21st June 1775, a sorrel mare, about 14 hands high, a natural trotter, marked with a ball face, her main hanging on the near side, four 3'ear old. Any person that will apprehend the thief and mare, so that the owner can have his mare again, shall be paid the sum of five pounds, and for the mare only three pounds paid by me. " William Lvox." "July 1, 1771. Capt. Abraham Bush, of Kye, in the province of New York, on a voyage from the eastward, bound home, coming out of Milford harbour, in Connecticut, Sunday morning the 14th day of last April, about three hours after his departure, saw (above half sound over towards Long Island) a wreck . . . which he brought into Kye har- bour. Any pel-son proving his property in said scow and boom, by applying to siiid Bush, in Rye, may have them again, paying him for his trouble and the charge he hath been put to. "Al!R.\HAM BlSH." As may be supposed, educational facilities were not very great while the county was thinly settled. The mother was often the only teacher, and the Bible the first text-book. In the city, the school-master was always, e.v officio, clerk, chorister and visitor of the sick. The catechism was taught, in Dutch, by these hard-worked pedagogues. As the population in- creased, very good schools were established. West- chester County had several, principally under the direction of some of the Huguenot immigrants, who " THE FLYING MACHINE." were gentlemen of culture and not accustomed to agricultural pursuits. Books were few in the early days, and there was little to develop literary taste, but the Dutch were not illiterate. There must have been a peculiar meaning in the singular custom ex- isting among the Dutch families of that period, of the father giving a bundle of (joose quills to his son and telling him to give one to each of his male pos- terity. Watson saw one which had a scroll appended saying, "This quill, given by Petrus Byvanck to James Bogert, in 1789, was a present in 1689 from his grand- father from Holland." As early as 1690 the people of Rye made an effort to procure a schoolmaster, and in many of the towns the proprietors offered the privileges of a school to all who would contribute toward the erection of a school-house. The English Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts included the tuition of youth in its programme of proselytism, and established teachers at various points in the county. The best educational advan- tages were enjoyed by that section of the county formerly a part of Connecticut, as that colony ri- valed Massachusetts in its care for the instruction of the young. In New York no provision was made for a general system of education before the Revolu- tion. Whatever was done for this interest, was done by individuals or religious bodies. The good people of Westchester were not more free from superstition than their neighbors. In 1672 a number of inhabitants of that locality com- plained to the Governor and Council that " a witch had come among them from Hartford, where she had been before imprisoned and condemned."' The woman was removed. A similar complaint was also made in 1673 ; " but the Military Governor, Captain Colve, a son of the ocean, not under this land influence per- haps, treated it as idle or superstitious, and so dis- missed the suit." A man and his wife, similarly accused, in 1665, had not got off so easily ; they were tried and found guilty. Belief in witchcraft was nothing uncommon, in those days, in Europe as well as in the colonies. The husbandry of the pioneers brought forth abundant yields. The soil was adapted to the culture of wheat, corn, rye and other cereals; to peaches, apples, cherries and the various berries ; and to a most prolific pasturage. Every farmer kept sheep, and had his wool spun in his own home. The weaving was done by men, who kept and worked small hand-looms in their houses. Blankets, sheetings and coarse cloths were produced in very considerable quantities. Much flax was raised, and was also spun at the fire- sides of the people, where the hum of the large and small wheels sounded through the day and evening. The linen was of remarkable excellence. Table- cloths and napkins, woven in diamonds and squares, were as smooth and glossy as satin, while the sheeting was fine, even-threaded and most durable. Every farm had a wood-lot, in which the men-servants exer- cised their thews in preparing the immense logs for the gaping fire-places that daily swallowed fuel by the cord. They also cut chestnut rails for the zigzag fences that took the place of stone walls in regions where trees were more numerous than boulders. Most of the farm labor was performed by negro and Indian slaves, between whom and their masters the kindliest relations existed, as a rule. These bonds- men identified themselves with the families in which they were raised, and exhibited a pride and import- ance scarcely excelled by their masters.' " It is not ' The Dutch settlers in Westchester County obtained their first .\fri- I can slaves under the "Freedoms and Exemptions" granted by the n West India Company in 1629, which promised that to all planters of col- I onies in the New Netherlands '* the Company will use their endeavors I to supply the Colonists with as many Blacks as they Conveniently Can ; | in such manner, however, that they shall not be bound to do it for a J longer time than they shall think proper.'' In 1G44 Nicholas Toorn, at I Rensselaerwyck, acknowledged the receipt of a young black girl — to be ' returned at the end of four years, "if yet alive," to the director-gen- ei-al or his successor. The average price of slaves was one hundred dol- lars in our money each for men and two hundred dollars for women. The treatment of them was, on the whole, humane. In 1644 an ordi- nance was passed which emancipated those who had served the company eighteen or nineteen years on condition of a yearly small payment in wheat, peas, beans and hogs, but a failure to comply with the conditions :\IAXNKKS AND CUSTOMS. 47 2a eas\-," Cooper makes Miles Walliiigroid say, to de- scribe the affection of an attached slave, which has blended with it the pride of a jjartisan, the solicitude of a parent and the blindness of a lover." A com- mon custom amonp; the Dutch was to assign to each child in the household, when it had reached six or eight years, a slave of the same age and sex, who clung to the little msister or mistress with an affection that was fully returned and, in many instances, lasted through life. There is a fact connected with the institution of slavery in the colony of New York which is too honorable for our forefathers to be omitted here, for in no section was it more true than in Westchester. The slaves lived under the same roof and partook of the same food as their nuistcrs ; they were allowed much familiarity and indulged in great freedom of I had them," says he, "were very free and I'auiiliar ; sometimes sauntering among the whites at meal-time, with hat on head, and freely joining occasionally in conversation, as if they were one and all of the same lK)Uschold." ' "Yet," says Watson, "no case had ever occurred of 'amalgamation,' and no instance of j mixed colour had been seen until produced by some in the British army coming among them. The first { instance of the kind j)roduced emotions of surprise j and dislike." One of the Old World customs brought over by the early settlers was the investiture "by turtf and twigg," I a relic of feudal times. It consisted in the delivery I of a turf, a stone, a branch or some other object as a .symbol of the transfer of the soil. Anciently this had been practiced by the feudal lord in conl'erring a fief upon his vassal. It was observed on Mauursing PK I .M ITI V E ( H EE.se- PR ES.S. speech. Captain Graydon, who was quartered at Flatbusli while a prisoner in the war of inde- pendence, testifies to this : " Their blacks, when they inrolTeil a return of the lar;garil to slavery. In KiKi the General Assem- bly proviiled penalties fur selling any coniniodity to any slave and for any person buying from tlieni or giving them credit. The same en- actment includoil a rigid fugitive slave law and conuuanded all consta- bles and inferior oHicers '• to prejw men. horses, boats or pinnaces to pnmie" runaway slaves "by sea or land, and to make diligent hue and cry, as by the law rcijuired." Later statutes pennitted masters to puu'sh al>Te6 with any chastisement nut extending to life or member ; for- blde the assemblage of more than three slaves ; ordered that the chil- dren of slave women shall be slaves: that each town or manor may have k whipper of slaves ; that any slave presuming to strike any Christian or Jew shall be committed to prison and suffer corporal punishment ; for- bide the harboring of slaves; provided that every nui-ster or the •X«cat«arty, whicli was a very small minority of the people affected by the operation of the law. The act itself is a conclusive argument against the alleged establishment of the Church of England in the province of New York. It was not established of any law of the province, nor by the ecclesiasti- cal law of lOngland extending over the province, wliich was thus ex- cluded or modified by express law made by competent authority. 2 " I'urifanism in New York," hy Kev. Charles A. Briggs, D.D. Mug- azine of Americtni History^ January, 1 883. MANNERS AND CUSTOMS. me that time scarce six in the whole county who so luucli as inclined to the church. After Mather luid been witli them some time, Westclicster parish made choice of me for one of their church wardens in hopes of using my influence with Colonel (Governor) Fletch- er to have Mather inducted to the living. I told them it was altogether impossible for me to comply with their desires, it being wholly repugnant to the laws of England to compel the subject to pay for the maintenance of any minister who was not of the Na- tional Church, and that it lay not in any Governor's power to help them, but since they were so zealous for having religion and good order settled amongst 'em, I would propose a medium in that matter, which was that there being at Boston a French Protestant Minister, Mr. Bondett, a very good man, who was in orders from my Lord (Archbishop) of London, and the people of New Rochelle being destitute of a min- ister, we would call Mr. Bondett to the living, and the parish being large enough to maintain two, we would likewise continue Mr. Mather and support him by subscription. The vestry seemed to be extreamly well pleased with this proposal and desired me to send for Mr. Bondett, which I immediately did, hoping by that means to bring them over to the church ; but Mather, apprehending what I aimed at, persuaded the vestry to alter their resolutions, and when he came they refused to call him, so that jjrojection failing me, and finding that it was impossible to make any progress toward settling the church so long as Mather contin- ued among us, I made it my business in the next place to devise ways to gett him out of the country, which I was not long in contriving, which being effected and having gained some few proselytes in every town, and those who were of the best esteem amongst 'em, who having none to oppose them, and being assisted by Mr. Vesey and Mr. Bondett, who very often preached in several parts of the country, baptizing the children, by easy methods the people were soon wrought into a good opinion of the church and indeed beyond my expectations." It is not explained by what means Heathcote drove the Puritan clergymen out of the country, but it is not doubtful that he turned many of the Presbyterians over to the Anglican faith and prepared the way for the work of the Society for the Propagation of Chris- tian Knowledge, an organization of the Church of England, which sent John Bartow out as a mission- ary. He was placed in charge of the Puritan Churches of East Chester, Westchester and Jamaica by Governor Cornbury, and the Puritan ministers, Joseph Morgan, of Westchester, and John Hubbard, of Jamaica, were forced to retire from their church buildings and parsonages.' The latter made a fight, 1 " I.onI Cornbury, equally zealous with his predecessor, Fletcliep for the spri-ad of the Church of Kngland, aiwunied the right that Fletcher had claimed to induct ministers into parishes, aud, undercolor of a law that had no existeui u, put the missionaries of the .Society in but Cornbury ousted him in favor of Bartow, who then attacked Morgan, with the result narrated in his own letter of December 1, 1707, to the secretary of the Society : " Not long after this my Lord (Cornbury) requested me to go and preach at East Chester; accordingly I went (tho' some there had given out threatening words should I dare to come), but tho' I was there very early and the people had notice of my coming, their Presbyterian minister, Mr. Morgan, had begun service in the meeting-house, to which I went straitway and continued the whole time of service without interruption, and in the afternoon I was per- mitted to perform the Church of England services, Mr. Morgan being present, and neither he or the people seemed to be dissatisfied, and after some time of preaching there afterwards they desired me to come oftener, and I concluded to minister there once a month, which now I have done for about three years, and Mr. Morgan is retired into New England." - Puritanism lost somewhat of its hold upon the people in consequence of the opposition of Cornbury ; but with the accession of the house of Hanover to the English throne, in 1714, persecution of the Puri- tans in America ceased. On November 22, 1718, Rev. Wm. Tennent settled at East Chester and began to rebuild Puritanism in the county. He removed to Bedford May 1, 172(1, and remained until August, 1726,preachingin all the townships, WhenMethodism divided the churches of the colony into antagonistic forces he became one of its leaders. An impetuous revival of faith occurred, which was guided by Thomas Smith at Rye and Samuel Sackett at Bedford. Ten- nent and his adherents were excluded from the Synod of Philadelphia in 1741, in the absence of the entire Presbytery of New York. The excluded Methodists rallied around the Presbytery of New Brunswick, and in 1745 it combined with the Presbytery of New York in erecting the Synod of New York, all of whose churches were in sympathy with the Meth- odists. In 1 7r)2 the Rye Church united with the Synod and thus all the original Puritan Churches of New York, organized in the seventeenth century, were combined in one compact Synodical organization. On possession of churches, glches and parsonages. This was done, or at- tempted, at Westchester and East Chester, Kye and Bedford. In Rye only, of all these towns, no church had been ljuilt ; hut a tax was levied ujwu the inhabitants for its erection, and meanwhile the house and lands which had been i)rovided for a minister and held by a suc- cession of pastors, were taken for the missionary. ' ("The Presliy- terians in the Province of New York," Kev. Charles W. Baird, M,ig. Amer. JIM., 1879, Vol. III., Part II.) 2 "Colonel Heathcote represents that Morgan «us ready to conform. But in this case he wits hasty in judgment. Morgan was of tougher fibre than Vesey. He resisted all the influence brought to bear upon him and remained faithful. He labored for many years as a Presby- terian mini.ster and died in New Jersey in connection with the ."Synod of Philadelphia. Rye was taken possession of Iiy Thomas Pritcliard and afterwards by Mr. Muirson. and John Jones, pastor of Bedford, was forced to retire lo Connecticut after arrest and reprimand before the Council." — JlrU/tjs' " Puritanimi iti Xew York." 4:12d HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the order that " every township is obliged to pay their minister according to such agreement as they shall make with him, and no man to refuse his proportion, the minister being elected by the major part of the householders inhabitants of the town." It was the original scheme of the English that in each parish a church "should be built in the most convenient part thereof, capable to receive and accommodate two hundred persons," but this was found impracticable, for in 1655 it was provided that such churches should be built within three years afterward, and to that end a town rate or tax was authorized to begin that year. In default of payment of the church rates by towns or individuals, a summary process was authorized for the collection of the assessments and subscriptions. It must not, however, be taken for granted that the Church of England immediately became the Estab- lished Church in New York. The controversy be- tween Governor Sloughter and the Assembly, in 1693, points the religious history of the time. All the members of the Assembly but one were Dissenters, and in considering a bill for settling a ministry they obstinately refused to incori>orate an amendment sub- mitted by the Governor, providing that the bill should be presented to him, " to be apjtrovod and collated." His object was to construct it to the advantage of the Church of England, and as the Assemblymen could not be coerced or persuaded, he prorogued the session and scolded them vigorously in an address wherein he notified them that he "would take care that neither heresy, schism nor rebellion be preached amongst you." This enactment of September 22, 1693, required the establishment of a " a good, sufficient Protestant minister, to olKciate and have the care of souls within one year next " in specified districts. Two were ordered for Westchester County — " one to have the care of Westchester, East Chester, Yonkers and the Manor of Pelham ; the other to have the care of Rye, Mamaroneck and Bedford." Each was to be paid fifty pounds per annum by a levy laid upon the peo- ple, which they might pay " in country jiroducc at money price." Iron-clad enactments jjrotected the pastor against the possibility of non-payment of salary. The justices of the county were required to issue warrants to the constables to summon the free- holders on the second Tuesday of January, to choose ten vestrymen and two church wardens ; the justices and the vestrymen laid the tax, and if it was not paid, the constables had the ])ower to distrain for it. At each stage of the proceedings fines were jirovided for persons or officials who failed to discharge their duties.' I The laaguage of the act refers only to a "Protestant Minister.', .'There can be uo Joubt," says Mr. Dawson, in the "Historical Jlaga- zine," "that it was the intention of the .\ssembly to provide for the main- tenance of the Dissenting clergy. Tlie act was very loosely worded, which, as things stood when it was niaile, could not be avoided. Tlie Dissenters could claim the benefit of itas well as Cbun huii-n, and unless The Puritans were keenly aflFected by this issue. Francis Doughty, who had been expelled by the Con- gregationalists from Taunton, Mass., is said to have been the first Puritan or Presbyterian minister in New York. He officiated from 1643 to 1648, and was supported by voluntary contributions from the Puri- tans and Dutch of the city. Puritans were certainly among the early settlers of Westchester. In volume iii. page 557, of the Documentary History of New York, there is an interesting description of a Puritan service at Westchester in 1656, conducted by two lay- men, Robert Bassett and a Mr. Bayley, who were prob- ably ruling elders, one reading a sermon and the other leading in prayer. When the colony was surrendered to the Duke of York, in September, 1644, there were within its bounds six Puritan ministers settled with their flocks. There were Puritan bands at Rye and Westchester without j)astors. ^ Governor Andros did not trouble the Puritan churches, which lost some of their veteran pastors, but continued to increase in numbers. Nathaniel Brewster settled at Brookhaven and supplied East Chester in 1665. In 1674 Eliphalet Jones supplied Rye and Ezekiel Fogg supplied East Chester. In 1()75 Peter Prudden i)reached at Rye, and Thomas Denham settled there in 1677. Thus within twelve years there were five Presbyterian clergymen exercis- ing their functions in Westchester County. Thej' and their flocks shared in the struggle which all Dissenters had to make with Governor Sloughter's efforts to estab- lish the Church of England as the State Church, but still Presbyterianism flourished. In Westchester County Rev. John Woodbridge located at Rye and Rev. Warham Mather at Westchester in 1684. These two clergymen were among the most import- ant personages in the lively episode which followed the conversion of Rev. William Vesey, a Puritan pastor in New York, to the Church of England His change of faith is said to have been procured by Colonel Heathcote, who, upon his settlement at Scarsdale, Westchester County, in 1692, showed himself a still zealous proselyter for the Church of England. In a letter to the Society for the Proi)agation of the Gos- pel, dated April 10, 1704, he relates a contention that was of great moment at the time : "The people of Westchester, East Chester and a place called Lower Yonkers agreed with one War- ren Mather, and the people of Rye with one Mr. Woodbridge, both of New England, there being at wrested from its true bearing, it admitted a construction ill their favor. In fact, it was arbitrarily and illegally wrested from its true bear- ing and niiule to answer the purpose of the Englisli Church party, which was a very small minority of the people affected by the operation of the law. The act itself is a conclusive argument against the alleged establishment of the Church of England in the province of New York. Itwjiii not established of any law of the province, nor by the ecclesiasti- cal law of Knglaiid e.vteudiiig over the province, which was thus ex- cluded or modified by express law made by competent authority. - " I'uritaiiism in New York," by Kev. Charles A. Briggs, D.D. Mag- uziite of Amtrricati Uistory^ JunuAry^ laii^. MANNEKS AND CUSTOMS. that time scarce six in the whole county who so mucli as inclined to the church. After Mather had been with them some time, Westclicster parisli made choice of me for one of their church wardens in hopes of using my influence with Colonel (Governor) Fletch- er to have Mather inducted to the living. I told them it was altogether impossible for me to comply with their desires, it being wholly repugnant to the laws of England to compel the subject to pay for the maintenance of any minister who was not of the Na- tional Church, and that it lay not in any Governor's power to help them, but since they were so zealous for having religion and good order settled amongst 'em, I would propose a medium in that matter, which was that there being at Boston a French Protestant Minister, Mr. Bondett, a very good man, who was in orders from my Lord (Archbishop) of London, and the people of New Rochelle being destitute of a min- ister, we would call Mr. Bondett to the living, and the parish being large enough to maintain two, we would likewise continue i\Ir. Mather and support him by subscription. The vestry seemed to be extreamly well pleased with this proposal and desired me to send for Mr. Bondett, which I immediately did, hoping by that means to bring them over to the church ; but Mather, apprehending what I aimed at, persuaded the vestry to alter their resolutions, and when he came they refused to call him, so that projection failing me, and finding that it was impossible to make any progress toward settling the church so long as Mather contin- ued among us, I made it my business in the next place to devise ways to gett him out of the country, which I was not long in contriving, which being effected and having gained some few proselytes in every town, and those who were of the best esteem amongst 'em, who having none to oppose them, and being assisted by Mr. Vesey and j\[r. Bondett, who very often preached in several parts of the country, baptizing the children, by easy methods the people were soon wrought into a good opinion of the church and indeed beyond my expectations." It is not explained by what means Heathcote drove the Puritan clergymen out of the country, but it is not doubtful that he turned many of the Presbyterians over to the Anglican faith and jirepared the way for the work of the Society for the Propagation of Chris- tian Knowledge, an organization of the Church of England, which sent John Bartow out as a mission- ary. He was placed in charge of the Puritan Churches of East Chester, Westchester and Jamaica by Governor Cornbury, and the Puritan ministers, Joseph Morgan, of Westchester, and John Hubbard, of Jamaica, were forced to retire from their church buildings and parsonages.' The latter made a fight, ' " Ixinl Cornbury, eqimlly zealous with his predecessor, Fleteberi for the spri'ad of the Cluirch of England, assnnied the right that Fletcher had claimed to iudiict ministers into |iarislies, and, undercolor of a law that had no existence, put the missionaries of the Society in but Cornbury ousted him in favor of Bartow, who then attacked Morgan, with the result narrated in his own letter of December 1, 1707, to the secretary of the Society : " Not long after this my Lord (Cornbury) requested me to go and preach at East Chester; accordingly I went (tho' some there had given out threatening words should I dare to come), but tho' I was there very early and the people had notice of my coming, their Presbyterian minister, Mr. Morgan, had begun service in the meeting-house, to which I went straitway and continued the whole time of service without interruption, and in the afternoon I was per- mitted to perform the Church of England services, Mr. Morgan being present, and neither he or the peoj)le seemed to be dissatisfied, and after some time of preaching there afterwards they desired me to come oftener, and I concluded to minister there once a month, which now I have done for about three years, and Mr. ]\Iorgan is retired into New England." - Puritanism lost somewhat of its hold upon the people in consequence of the opposition of Cornbury; but with the accession of the house of Hanover to the English throne, in 1714, persecution of the Puri- tans in America ceased. On November '22, 1718, Eev. Wm. Tennent settled at East Chester and began to rebuild Puritanism in the county. He removed to Bedford May 1, 1720, and remained until August, 1726,preachingin all the townships. WhenMethodism divided the churches of the colony into antagonistic forces he became one of its leaders. An impetuous revival of faith occurred, which was guided by Thomas Smith at Rye and Samuel Sackett at Bedford. Ten- nent and his adherents were excluded from the Synod of Philadelphia in 1741, in the absence of the entire Presbytery of New York. The excluded Methodists rallied around the Presbytery of New Brunswick, and in 1745 it combined with the Presbytery of New York in erecting the Synod of New York, all of whose churches were in sympathy with the Jleth- odists. In 1 752 the Rye Church united with the Synod and thus all the original Puritan Churches of New York, organized in the seventeenth centurj', were combined in one compact Synodical organization. On possession of churches, glebes and parsonages. This was done, or at- tempted, at Westchester and East Chester, Rye and Bedford. In Rye only, of all these towns, no church had been built; but a tax was levied ui)on the inhabitants for its erection, and meanwhile the house and lands which had been provided lor a minister and held by a suc- cession of pastors, were taken for the mis-sionary." ("The Presby- terians in the Province of Xew York," Rev. Charles W, Baird, Mug. Amer. Hist., 1879, Vol. HI., Part II.) -"Colonel Heathcote represents that Morgan was ready to conform. But in this case he wits hasty in judgment. Jlorgan was of tougher tibre than Vesey. He resisterl all the influence brought to bear upon him and remained faithful. He labored for many years as a Presby- terian minister and died in New Jersey in connection with the .Synod of Philadelphia. Rye was taken possession of by Tliom:4s Pritchard and afterwards by Mr. Muirson. and John Jones, pastor of Bedford, was forced to retire to Connecticut after arrest and reprimand before the Council." — Uriggs' " Purilattinn in Xew York." 472/ HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. November 29, 1769, Mr. De Witt offered in the As- sembly a bill " to exempt the inhabitants of the Coun- ties of Westchester, New York, Queens and Richmond from any taxation for support of the Ministers of churches to which they do not belong." And this was finally passed with amendments applying it es- pecially to persons not in communion with the Church of England. The Dutch pioneers on Manhattan found it con- venient to adopt the currency of the Indians, who took the common periwinkle, called by them "Metean- hock," found in great quantities along the shores, and having broken it so as to secure the thick portion at the stem, they made of this beads about the size of a straw and a third of an inch in length.^ This was the white sewan of least value. A black bead of the same description was made from the large round clam called the " quahaug." These beads were woven into belts, and divided into pieces of different values. Thirty Dollars. THE Bearer is en- titled to recci'vc Thirty SpanSJh milled D O L LARS, or an equal Sum in Gold or Silver, according to a Refo lution of COAfGRESS /of the I4i]i fanuary, ^779- AO Dollars. cox irNl-ATA I, critllKNCV. Four beads counted for a stuy ver or two for a cent, and a braided string a fathom long was valued at four guilders, equivalent to $1.(56. Sewant was conanonly measured by spans, and the Indians, in their traffic with the Dutch, always chose as traders their men who could cover the greatest length between finger and thumb. But counterfeits sprung up, and the currency in course of time became debased. The Indian money was even imported from Europe, where imitations were made of porcelain, but this base article could not impose on the natives, and the counterfeit failed as a speculation. The " good splendid sewant of Man- hattans " was the genuine article and passed in all the Indian country roundabout, for this island and the neighboring sections were the great mint of the Indians. Up the North River, in Westchester and 1 " KeminiBcences of the City of New York and Vicinity." — Henry B. Dawson, New York, 18dj. elsewhere, sewant had its legal tender value well de- fined until so many broken, unstrung and badly made pieces came into circulation that the Dutch govern- ment — coin still being scarce — was obliged to find a new currency. Beaver-skins supplied the de- ficiency and became the next fiat money of the day. This was an article less subject to fluctuations and was divided into " whole beavers " and " half beav- ers," the former being rated at about three dollars. What little of the Dutch currency was in circulation was known as " Hollands. ' In contracts for sale and purchase of real estate and personal property, the distinctive sorts of payment were usually expressed ; and if not stated, it was understood that sewant was the consideration. There were certain sorts of con- tracts, however, such as ocean freights, in which, by the customs of merchants, it was implied that pay- ment was to be made in beavers. On account of the debasement of the sewant currency, the Council or- dered in May, 1650, that six white or three black sewants should pass for one stuyver (half a cent), and the base strung sewant, eight white or four black for one stuyver. Legal tender legislation was not then .so well understood. Many people refused to accept the base sewant until, in the following September, the Council enacted " that the base strung sewant should be received by every one without distinction, in payment for small daily and necessary commodities in housekeeping, and that it should be current as follows: For twelve guilders or under, all may be paid in base strung sewant ; from twelve to twen- ty-four guilders, half base and half good strung sewant; and in larger sums agree- ably to the agreement between buyer and seller." In 1658 the rate was again al- tered to eight white and four black of sewant for one stuyver. The colony was from a superabundant and depreciated which was intrinsically worthless. Bea- had an actual value apart from that the good suffering currency, vers, which which legislation could place upon them, appre- ciated until they were rated at sixteen guilders each ; and, as a matter of course, provisions and house- hold necessaries followed the upward movement of the currency which kept anything like an even ratio with real money. Shop-keepers, tapsters, brewers, bakers, grocers and workingmen charged a difierence of eighty, ninety or a hundred per cent, between sewant and beaver in taking pay for their goods or their labor. The Council struggled bravely to enhance the value of the sewant by resorting to the fiction that values can be controlled by arbitrary enactment. Its next law (November 11, 1658) was " that the brewers, tapsters, bakers, and other shop- keepers and common grocers, should sell the daily MANNERS AND CUSTOMS. 472,7 necessary family commodities to the buyers at their different prices, to wit, silver money, beavers and sewant: as forinstance, the brewers should deliver one barrel of good beer for ten guilders (about #3.80) in silver money, according to the Holland value of fifteen guilders in beavers, the beaver at eight guilders to twenty-two guilders ; in sewant eight white or four black for a stuyver." It is testimony to the drinking customs of the Dutch families' that beer and wine were estimated by the law as necessaries of which no household should be deprived by exorbitant or fluctuating prices. The cost of the malt liquor was made little enough in this ordinance of lt Shrub 7 9 U To 104 Bottels for Wine >t Rum whereof there is 3 re- turned. Remains 1111 Rot. f :i To the Carting Wine A- Shrub 2 To 2 Loads wooital crime, and it was not long before the hangman became one of the officials of the colonies. His methods were far more brutal and painful than those which a more humane civilization ha.s since devised. Instead of the modern trap, or other appliances designed to dislocate the HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. vertebrte of the convict, the old-time gibbet was merely two ui)rights with a cross beam, from which depended the rope and uoose. He was driven under it in a cart, the noose fastened about his neck and the cart driven ofi', leaving him to perish slowly of strangulation. Such malefactors were always hanged in chains and their bodies left swinging in the irons for months, a supposed ghastly and terrible warning to evil-doers. Sometimes the hangnuin would jump upon the shoulders or swing from the feet of the criminal in order to expedite the strangling process. The stocks, the i)illory and the whipping-post were instruments of ])UQishnu'nt for lesser olfenscs. They were part of the judicial equi])ment of every county town or seat of government, and stood conveniently near to the court-house or jail, for in the early days both were usually situated in one building. Punish- ment by the pillory was much the more severe, the victim being in a standing position ; but even that by the stocks was exceedingly i)ainful, and it was not uncommon for men to swoon under the agony of either the pillory or the stocks. But while the colonists followed European precedent in the infliction of rigorous penalties, and their laws embraced many THE STOCKS. statutory crimes now abolished, yet they made no use of such instruments of torture as the rack, wheel, thumb-screw or pincers, found in all European prisons and even the ducking-stool seems not to have been employed outside of New England. It will be gathered from the I'oregoing that the government of New Amsterdam, which exercised jurisdiction over Westchester County, went a long distance into the detsiils of every-day life, and was almost microscopic in its purview of the incidents of trade and jiersonal relations. While this is true, it was yet liberal and generous. Modern criticism may take exception to its religious intolerance, but that was more apparent than real. The Dutch settlers at Manhattan and above on the Hudson were soon joined by English Puritans, Huguenots from Rochelle, Waldeuses from the Piedmont country of Erance, German Lutherans and Anabaptists, Swedes and Catholic Walloons. They lived together amicably, because the Dutch trend in the new country was toward tolerance, whatever it might have been in the old. Incidents that took place within and around the historic houses of Westchester County during the ' 1 Revolution reveal much of the methods and sur- roundings of the peoj)le in those days. ' The phleg- matic Dutchman who then occupied the Livingston house at Dobbs Ferry, was for a time frightened away by the hum of cannon-balls about his premises. When, in 1777 General Lincoln made the place his headquarters, he j)iled four barrels of gunpowder in a little shed in the rear of the house, answering the proprietor's remonstrances with the remark that " it was a good dry place for it." After the army marched away the Dutchman found that the barrels contained nothing but sand, and had been placed there as a ruse to deceive the enemy if any of their spies should come prowling about. Here Washington entertained the Due de Lauzun, Count de Rochambeau, Steuben and others of the dis- tinguished foreign oflicers, on July 6, 178L Alexan- der Hamilton presided, and his graceful manners and witty speeches provoked universal admiration. Here also Washington and Sir Guy Carleton, and their respective suites met to arrange for the evacuation of New York by the British. On the sequestration of the Philipsburgh Manor the property was purchased by Peter Van Brugh Livingston, and it thence took his family name. The Roger Morris house, at the most elevated point of Harlem Heights, where the steep, rocky right bank of the Harlem River slopes gently to the southwest, was built, in 1758, for the man whose name it bears. He was a captain in the British army, and in that year married the lovely Mary Philipse, for whose hand Washington is said to have been an unsuccessful suitor. A lively fancy may be I)ermitted to call up his emotions when, in Septem- ber, 1776, as commander-in-chief of the American army, he made the residence of the woman who had rejected him his headquarters, or when, in July, 1790, as President of the LTnited States, he revisited it, she and her husband being attainted fugitives from the home which the new governnu^nt had con- fiscated. The wealthy Frenchman, Stephen .Jumel, bought it, and his wife adorned it with an exquisite taste and lavish hand. There she lived until her death, in 1865; there, in the days of her widowhood, she married Aaron Burr, and it was over this very valuable estate that her heirs wrangled until the courts disposed of it.'- During and after the fight at Chatterton's Hill Washington had his headquarters in the Miller house 1 .Soldiers and marauders plundered indiscriminately in Westchester County, until Washington sent .\aron Burr to take command. A letter from Judge Samuel Youngs, of Mount Pleasant, printed in the " His- torical Magazine" for June, 1S71, says: "No man went to bed but under the apprehension of having his house plundered or burnt, orhim- self or family massacred before morning. Some, under the character of Whigs, plundered the Tories ; while others of the latter description, pluudcred the Whigs. Parties of marauders assuming either ehariicter or none, as suited their convenience, indiscriminately assailed both Whigs and Tories." Burr came to the county in the fall of 1778 and stopped all this by military rule and strict enforcement of order. - Benson J. Lossiug in AppleUm's Jvunial, vol. x., 1873. MANNERS AND CUSTOMS. 472i at White Plains, which until recently was in the pos- session of that tiimily, by whose name it is still known. He was frequently at the Birdsall house, in Peekskill, which was one of the first buildings erected in the vil- lage. It was a favorite tavern and was repeatedly vis- ited by the ofticers when the allied armies, under Washington and Rochambeau, menaced the English positions in and about New York. It stands on the old post road and is still kept as a tavern. Near by are yet seen the remains of the old fort which crowned this elevated position at the mouth of the Highland Gorge.' It appeal's from some Revolutionary papers that there were localiti("s in Westchester County which are now unknown. Washington, in his order-book, under date of October 24, 1782, directs : "The tents being too cold for the accommodation of the sick, the regimental surgeons will send no more to the flying hospital, but have such as are hospital patients sent to the huts at New Boston."' Where was " New Boston ? "' On the night of the 13th of May, 1781, Lieutenaut Colonel Greene, the hero of Red Bank, was killed at his quarters on the Groton River, near the site of the present dam, l)y a party of I)e Lancey's corps. Pay- master Thomas Hughes, of the American army, who was in the house at the time, contrived to escape. A letter describing the action, written a few hours after- ward, he dates at Rhode Island Village. Where was " Rhode Island Village ?" - The old-tinu' taverns of the county had their rec- ords worthy of preservation. One of the most cele- brated of these was the " Blue Bell," concerning the location of which there has been much controversy. In vol. iv.. No. 6, of the Historical Magazine, June, 1880, Gharles A. Campbell thus indicates it in a quotation from an old chronicle : "The holy Ntoraincnt wius adniiiiietercd to the Huguenots of New Ro chelle four times a year, viz., Christmas, Easter, Whitsunday and the middle of September. During tlie iiitermi^ions tliat occurred the com- municants walkeil to New York for that jiurpose. Prior to their de- parture, on a Sunday, they always collected the young children ami left them in the care of their friends, while they set off early in the morning and walked to the city barefooted, carrying their shoes and stockings in their hands, .\bout twelve miles from New York, at a place niiice culled the Bliif J>V(i, there «as a large rock by the roadside coveriil with re^Jar ; here they stopped for a short time to rest and take some refresh- ments, and tlien proceeded on their .journey till they came to Kresh Water Pond, within the bounds of the city. Here they washed their feet, pnt i>n their shoes and stockings, and walked to the French Church (the old church I)u St. Esprit in Pine Street), where they generally ar- rired by the time service begun." A writer in the same magazine (vol. viii.. No. 4, October, 1881 ) located the tavern on the east side of the old King's Bridge road, " opposite the old yellow house now standing south of One Hundred and Eighty-iii-st Street," and added that it was directly east of Fort Washington, and was demolished about Jtiig. vol. iii. No. 2, April, 187!). The same number mentions that on his entrance to New York, in November, 1783, he stopped at Day's Tavern, opposite the Point of Rocks, at the junction of the Har- lem and Kingsl>ridge roads. > Ilitlo. .V.iy., vol. vi. No. 1, January, 1881. 43 1820. To support his statement against those writers who urged that it was on the west side of that high- way, he quotes at length (vol. iv. p. 4f)0; v. p. 142 ; vi. pp. 64, 22, 300), from the reminiscences and papers of Isaac M. Dyckmaii and Blazius Ryer. He contends that the mistake arose from the location of another old house about half a mile south of the Blue Bell," and which was on the west side of the road and was destroyed by fire about 1846. The Magazine of American History for November, 1881, reviews all this testimony and draws the deduction that the colonial tavern was on the west side, but that some time after 1802, the first hostelry of the name having been abandoned iu 1787, Blaze Moore revived the old sign of the "Blue Bell " at a tavern which he kept on the east side.'' Lossing's gossij) of this venerable house of refresh- ment* acce])ts the west side theory and makes it a THE PILLORY. structure that, when he wrote, was still stauding and occupied as a dwelling. He quotes Cadwallader Col- den, who, in October, 1753, wrote to his wife of having rested at it on a journey to New York, when it was " very well kept by a Dutchman named Vanderventer, and our food and lodgings were very comfortable." Tradition says that General Heath occupied it for his headquarters in October, 1776, and that Washing- ton and Lee met there on the morning when they followed the American army and journeyed together to the Bronx. It was the headquarters of the Hessian Colonel Ralle after the assault on Fort Washington. One of his aides fell in love with the pretty sister of young Vanderventer, and promised to remain in America if she would marry him. Her mother and Ralle favored the union, and despite the opposi- tion of her brother, they were married in Ralle's own 3 The abundant references for this theory include the records of the Van Olilem's tract. Gauthier's survey of the northern part of New York Island, nuule by onler of Lord Percy, in Xovendier, 1770, locates the " Blue Bell on the west of the roaping-places, and was known as the Cross Keys, by reason of two keys being crossed on the sign-board. It is said to have been kept by David Wares. The Uyckman nousE, the only real Dutch farm-house extant on this road, standing not far from the twt'lve-niile stone, was built by .Jacob Dyckman, as we are told by Isaac M. Dycknian, the present representa- tive of the name at King's Bridge, just after the close of the war, the original family mansion being burned by the enemy. The said Dyck- nian, a very enterprising and wealthy man, was the projector of the j bridge across Harlem River, sometimes called by his name, and owned the land on which the large hotel at King's Bridge now stands. The I old one stood on about the same foundation, and was burnt down some i forty years ago. Kifty-five years ago it is remembered as kept by James I Devoe. (ieneral Heath, in his "Memoirs," speaks of it as Hyatt's tav- ern. This was in 1777. Devoe subsequently hired it to one Jacob Hyatt. Doubtless it whs sometimes called Djckman's tavern, from the Dyckman ownei-ship. The McComb Hoi se, at King s Bridge, long the property of Joseph Godwin, Esq., is said to have been used as a tavern during the Revo" lution, and Mrs. Robert McComb was accnstonied to point out to her 1 The New York Faciei of June 10, 1748, contains the following adver- tisement ; "The Blue Bell Bbvived.— Stephen Dolbeer begs leave to acquaint his friends and the public in general that he has opened the Blue Bell Tavern, at Fort AVasliington, where he hopes for the continuance of his form^- customers and all those gen- tlemen who please to favour him with their custom ^» / shall be waited on in the genteelest manner. .\lso f // X good stabling and pasture for horses." / In the hailtj Advertiser of February 17, 1787, John Battin advertises that his porter house, at the sign of the Blue Bell, Sloat Lane, will remove on the first of Maj* to the house opposite to the one he then oci upied. The carrying of the sign to the city probably disposes of the Revolutionary Blue Bell, as Colles, in bis road map of 1789, marks the old house as Wuldron's Tavern. guests one of the upper rooms as once the lodging-room of General Washington. The venerable Dr. Bibby, of Cortlaodt House, states that this property was purchased, shortly after the War of Independence, of the heirs of Eden Mefcalf by .Me.tander Mc('omb, of New York, the father of General .\lcxander McComb, of the I'nited States anny. The Century House. — The oldest farm-house now standing on or near the King's Bridge road is that known as " the Century House." It is on the Harlem River bank, and belongs to the ancient Nagle family, original landholders of that iiart of the island with the Dyrk- mans. Its date, marked on a stone inserted in the front wall, is, if we remember right, 1734. It is described by \V. C. Smith in his article on the Roger Morris house. — Mug. of Am. Hist., vi. 1(13. There were two " Black Horse " inns of fame. That of the colonial and Revolutionary period was situated near McGown's Pass, and was still standing in 1812. The second was built in 1805 near the Tabby Hook Landing, or what is now called Inwood .Street, and was the half-way house for the Albany coaches be- tween their starting-point in New York City and the first change at Yonkers.^ Henry Norman was its builder and original proprietor, and when the Widow Crawford kept it, a sign, bearing the figure of a black horse, swung from a pole in front of the door. Neither the inn nor the land on which it stands has had many owners. In 1740 John Schuyler, Jr., Philip Schuyler, Stephen Bayard, Jr., and James Stephenson had it by letters patent from the King ; from them it passed to John Livingston, who sold it, with all its rights and titles, " except to gold and sil- ver mines," to Johannis Seckeles; he to Henry Nor- man ; he to a Dyckman, and the latter to the Flint family. These are pictures of days that have long faded into the azure of history, but it .seems as if the writer can almost touch the men and women who figured in them as he scans the records they have left of their work and their play, their strong attachments and their fierce resentments, their deeds in peace and war. They are very real when one accompanies them in their homes and follows them through the routine of the day. They were brave, sturdy, passionate, faith- ful and aggressive people, fitted to conquer virgin soil and found the nation that stands the peer of the ancient commonwealths from which they were de- rived. Straight down in an unbroken line from them we trace the march of progress that leads to the im- perial New York of the present day and the noble environment of Westchester County. Their sons and daughters have been worthy of them, and in the people of the county to-day we see preserved those traits of moral worth, of maternal enterprise, and of lofty patriotism which are the safeguard ol' the most highly developed American communities. - Apptetou' B Joiim4il, November 7, 1874. GENERAL HISTORY FROM 1783 TO 1860. 473 CHAPTER VIII. GENERAL HISTORY FROM 1783 TO 1860. BY REV. WILLIAM S. COFFEY, M.A. of East Chester. Poet-Bevolutionary Narrative — Public Works— Political History. It will be readily conceived that years must have elapsed before the memory of the wrongs and of the emotions which they aroused should have disappeared to any extent among the inhabitants of Westchester County, who had suffered so much in the Revolu- tionary conflict. The bitter animosities in families and between neighbors which had been engendered, it were hard for the most considerate to lay aside, and it were scarce possible that the most trifling disagree- ment should not reproduce.' The high-handed measures of confiscation, which followed the procla- mation of peace, served to inflame anew the old sores ; and the accusations, indictments, prosecutions and inflictions for offenses of the war-time, which filled up, for several years after it, the proceedings of the County Court of Sessions, are but indications not more of the outrages reprehended, than of the subsequent unwillingness to condone and forget them. The many missed faces, the traces of care and anxiety on those one did meet, the decayed and vacant houses and dilapidated barns, the marked change in the cir- cumstances of the well-to-do families, the alteration in the moral tone, not only of the young, but of many past the years of early life who in them had been most exemplary, the number of diseased and wounded men, many of whom were hastening to their graves, the often felt presence still of the lawless marauder daring enough to follow his once riskless trade — all this kept up long the general sadness and tearfulness. This story, indeed, would be incomplete, if men- tion were not made of the hundreds of excellent people who reluctantly left the county for foreign homes. But to those who did remain is the credit due that they settled themselves t) their old employments, much impoverished, but with strong wills, and not a •MtOor Samuel Pell, who before the war had become engaged to his cousin, Mary Pell, seems, from letters of expostulation with him of his brother, Philip I'ell. to have been very anxious, as the contest was closing, to abruptly leave the service. He had so distinguished himself, •specially at the Battle of Saratoga, as to have received the highest en- cuminnis, and his family was anxious lest he should be a loser by his impatience. But at the dawn of peace he returned home and claimed his affianced, who indignantly spurned him with the declaration that she would not have one come near her, who bad the scent of a rebel. Neither of them ever married. Will one wonder at the bitter feelings of an old inhabitant cf East Chester, when he remembered that his mother, with himself an infant in her arms, was compelled to escape in the dead of the night from her burning home- set on fire by the enemy, in pursuit of her husband ? The very man who had informed them of Captain L.'s arrival home, how must he have been maddened in his turn when he remem- bered that he had been lashed, again and again, to force from him his money, and had sjKjnt night after night away from his homo and family to avoid the violence and robbery of hostile neighbors? 44 few with great hopes. Patriotic expressions, declara- tions of the difficulties of the situation, wise counsel- ings as to the public policy, and as to the courses of action in the several industries and interests, mingle in the letters of the day, with the usual detail of inci- dent, and ever and anon with passionate denunciation of the past follies of neighbors bringing so much trou- ble. The farms of the County, with soil none the best to be sure, were in a while restored to their former yield- ing power, and signs of the old comfort and thrift began to appear. It was not long before it was real- ized that the former strength and prosperity were fast returning. The population, which had decreased some one thousand or twelve hundred, began to show marks of increase. Perhaps nothing gave a stronger impulse to the im- provement in the condition of the county than the demand, at the beginning of this century, for the products of the American soil in foreign markets, during the distracting and devastating war on the European Continent. The prices which the farmer obtained were almost fabulous, and all the other in- dustries, of course, flourished under the good fortune. In connection with this, it must also be stated that the freedom of the seas was now open, unrivaled, to the new nation, whose fine harbors so distinctively seemed to point out the commercial consequence to which, under a wise policy, she might attain. The Port of New York was especially marked for its ac- tivity, and the number of vessels which weekly started, freighted for foreign markets, seem, under all the cir- cumstances, almost incredible. Of course, from this prosperity of the city, Westchester County, in its turn, derived much advantage. In noting the progress of the several towns, we are struck with the steadily increasing traffic by land and water, and with the multiplication of the facilities for intercommunication. Smaller roads are being con- structed and ready access afforded to the mills, to the villages and to the River and the Sound. The old thoroughfares are being improved and new lengths of road take the place of impracticable old ones. On the east side of the county, by act of the Legislature of 1800, under a company of which Philij) Pell, John P. Delancy, Cornelius Rosevelt, Peter J. Munroe and Gabriel Furman are the members mentioned in the bill, a turnpike road was constructed from East Chester to Byram River, over which soon passed the eastward stage to Greenwich, Stamford, Danbury, New Haven and on to Boston, of course covering the various villages of the county which were on the route. But still other matters attract our attention. The religious services have been resumed at all the old points and the church edifices have been repaired or rebuilt. Where titles were defective and action of the town was required, the steps thought proper were taken at town-meeting, or where an act of the Legis- 474 HISTOKY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. lature was needed to protect a neighbor or his family from wrong, it was applied for and obtained. Take, as an instance, the Act passed June 19, 1812, for the heirs of a valued citizen and patriot, John G. Wright, in which it was provided that " letters patent issue for Charity Wright, his widow, and for his heirs for five hundred acres in the tract set apart for the use of the line of this State in the Army of the United States, which said John Wright was a Surgeon's mate in the General Hospital in the Northern De- partment." The machinery of the higher courts was set in motion and crimes were promptly punished and W V^»w\ ^ wis. V^-iO^ - wrongs more thoughtfully and certainly redressed. The education of the children became more an object of attention under new incentives and ne- cessities. The provisions of the act of the 9th of April, 1795, by which the sum of one thousand one hundred and ninety-two pounds was given annually for five years for school purposes to the County of Westchester, grew out of this feeling, and were responded to according to the conditions of the gift by the voters of each town, in the appropriation of a sum equal to one-half of what was received, school commissioners being chosen for the distribution of the moneys. The above is a fac- simile of a paper on file in the office of the Town Clerk of East Chester, in which is certified the amount of school money allotted to that town. This was the first apportionment under the act. Just as readily, in 1812, when an equal sum to that appropriated by the State was in a new Act asked of each town, the vote was readily given, and the proper officers named. During this period, through- out the county, school-houses were being restored or re-erected. Provision for the poor was also freely made yearly by the several towns and by the Board of Supervisors. In 1786 eighteen hundred pounds were appro- priated for the erection of court-houses and jails at White Plains and Bedford. After the burning of the public buildings at White Plains in the war, prisoners had been confined in the jails at New York, Westchester and Kingston, and in other places, temporarily, for safety, and the courts were held in the Presbyterian Church at Bedford and the church building at East Chester (not yet used for religious purposes). This steady and quite regular increase is the more wonderful as remembered in connection with the known fact of heavy losses by the removal of some of the best people of the County to large farms and more productive localities in the northern and central regions of the State. To the adjoining city there was, and ever since has been, a large annual contribution of those preferring the haunts of trade. The names of Westchester County settlers ap- pear in large numbers in the City Direc- tory of the early years of this century, and in the Record Books of Deeds, Mortgages and Wills, at the county seats of Northern, Central and Western New York. In many cases the farmer soldiers of the Revolution, or those to whom they had sold out their " rights," were event- ually settling on the lands which had been laid out for and divided among the troops of the State of New York. Charles Ward, on the 16th of June, 1795, from Palatine Bridge, on the Mohawk, writes: "Business goes on briskly this summer, and my crops like to be good, and I have the prospect of getting in a large crop of wheat." ' At the height of this prosperity the course which England and France thought fit to take to weaken each other in 1806 had the most serious effect upon the United States, whose interest and desire was to. avoid all complications and preserve peace. In this " afflicting crisis," the consequences of which were 1 Cbarles Ward, eldest son of Stephen Ward, and for several yeal'^ ";ift 'r peace " the town clerk of East Chester. In 1S03 be represented llontgoniery County in the New York Assembly. GENERAL HISTORY FROM 1783 TO 1860. 475 felt throughout the laud in the depreciation of values, particularly of the agricultural products, the Em- bargo Act, which prohibited any exportation of goods whatever, brought the people into the still more subdued position, strongly stated at the time as "one in which they shall sell nothing but what they sell to each other" and "all our surplus produce shall rot on our hands." ■ The reduction in the prices went on until it amounted to sixty per cent. Wheat, which had been selling per bushel at two dollars, scarce brought seventy-five cents. And not only were the citizens of the county affected by the diminished value of their goods, but also many of them by the stoppage of the returns from their ventures, in the ships and their cargoes, in which they had joined interest with the traders of the city. The citizens of Westchester County were prepared without distinction of party to enter with their fellow- citizens of the State into the defense of their com- mon country in the War of 1812. There is abundant evidence that the factious spirit which appeared in New England made but little show in these parts. The questions discussed were rather as to the wisdom and the vigor which characterized the movements in asserting the national dignity than . as to the necessity of them. Time had been allowed, since the aggressive act of 1806, to the most partial to realize the narrow and contemptuous feeling of the enemy, and new evidence was continually turning up, in the acts of impressment and uncalled-for interference with our marine, that self-preservation was the neces- sity of the hour. The numbers of foremost citizens of our towns, who are remembered as in later yeai-s referring with pride to their military services in the last war with Great Britain, show that by the best members of the community there was evinced at the time all that zeal, which anxiety for the reputation of the county could desire. In the positions of home defense, as well as of active duty at distant points, and in the invoked labors of placing " the city " in a condition for resistance, the sons of Westchester were behind none of their countrymen. A careful examination of the condition of the county during the war shows indications rather of prosperity than of embarrassment. The prices were encouriiging to labor, and a number of the citizens of those times laid then the foundations of their future wealth. The crops seem to have been abundant. So, when peace was restored, there was a broad basis laid upon which a substantial prosperity might steadily be realized. As in the colonial period, so for many years after it, the population was made up of thrifty farmers, the colored race (not very valuable as lielp, certainly not as property), of a few tradespeople and mechanics, and of a sprinkling of men of wealth, ■Ganlenier's speech iu Congress, February, 1S08, IlUlarical 3l<(^ii:iiie, November, 1S73. the influence of whose hereditary or 'acquired for- tunes was distinctly felt in all the neighborhoods in which, they had settled. From the following paper may be obtained an impression of the financial strength of the county, and, what will be to many of interest, the names of leading persons in it in the various walks of life : Statement OF THE AMOUNT OP iNTEBNAi. Duties imposed by the Laws OK THE United States (except those on Furniture, Watches and Stamps) Paid nv EACH Person in the Third Collection District Of New York durinu the year 1815. $25.88 $17.50 Archer, .John (of G. B.) . 24.98 Bareinore, Nathan'I & Son 1.87 19.50 1.25 4.00 22,50 Anderson, .Jeremiah . . . 2.00 22.50 4.00 22.50 Archer, John (of E. C.) . 38.54 14.69 15.00 2.00 2.6.5 2.00 0.84 21.88 0.49 21.88 1.13 27.18 4.00 Anderson, Joseph, Jr. . . 3.18 4.(10 2.00 1.00 Beekman, Stephen D. . . 4.00 Carpenter, Mary .... 1.00 11.00 Carpenter, Cliarles . . . 4.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 2,00 7.00 4.00 1.00 1,00 Buckley, Gershum . . . . 4.00 2.(K) Browne, Ilachali.ah . . . . 4.00 18,50 1.00 l.OO 1.00 Calliun, Tlionias Mc . . . 2.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 Carpenter, William . . . 2,00 4.00 9.10 4.00 2.tK) 2.00 Cornwell, Jonathan . . . 2.00 1.00 2.(K) Brown, Thomas (of Rye . . 9.00 Constant, St. John . . . 2.00 Brown, Gilbert (W. P.) . . 5.00 Constant, Silas 2 00 2.00 Cooper, Elias 3,00 Brundage, Edward, Jr . . . 1.00 Coggshall, Gideon, . . . . 4.00 Bates, Neamiah S . . . . . 23.88 Crooker, Benjamin . . . . 19..")(l 2.00 Carvill, George, Jr . . . . 2.00 1.00 1.00 Burling, Thomas H , . . . 4.00 1.00 4.00 . 2.00 4.00 Clark, John G 2.00 4.00 2.00 1.0(1 1.00 Bailey, Gilbert .... 2.00 Carpenter, James . . . 2.00 Bailey, Josepli . . 1.00 Crane & Titus 77.81 . 29.38 Brown, Stephen (C. T.) . . 35.76 3.77 2.00 17.47 8.00 Covenlioveu, Martha . . . 17.50 2.00 Clark, John G 21.88 Brown, Stephen, Jr. (C. T.) 3.5 .7e Cook, Elizabeth . 14..5U lU cdle, William .... 2.(K) 21.88 Brown, Thomas (C. T.) . . 2.0(1 21.88 Brown, Cornelius . . . . . 23.38 Cooper, John (W. C.) . . 21.88 l.OO Clark, Stephen . 18 00 Brown, John 21.88 22.50 Brown, Henry .... . . 14..59 . 22..W Baldwin, Kbeuezer. . . . . 17..>0 476 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Diicher, William i . , , . 12.00 SI .00 1.00 Guion, John (of Yonkers) . 21.80 Dusenbferry, Charles (G. B.); 1.00 21.88 4.00 Green & Carpenter . . * . 21.8.3 24.50 21.88 Davenport, Lawreuce . . 2.00 21.88 20-50 21,88 1.00 1.88 2.00 21.88 Dusenberry, Charles (C. t.) 25.88 14.50 Baggetj Herman . . 1.00 17.50 Dyckman, Elizabeth . . . . 11.00 Guion, John (of N. R.) . . 21.88 3.00 0.42 83.88 41.65 Dusenberry, John H; . . . 1.00 Griffin, Daniel 20.55 Donell. Flofo Mc 2.00 13.46 a.oo 3.00 1.00 Hammond, Abraham . . 2.00 Dunalil, Alexander Mc . . . 2:00 1.00 2^.77 1.00 2:50 Hammond, William . . . 2.00 23.55 2.00 11.88 Hevland, Solomon . . . 1.00 Dyckman, William If . . . 17.50 Hollpy, Caleb 1.00 21.88 2.00 17.50 2.00 21.88 Horton, Jonathan P . . . 1.00 Dusenberry, John 14..^9 Howlaud, John (of Rye) . 2.00 24.10 1.00 Dyckman, Benjamin . . . 17.50 1.00 2.00 Halsted, Philemon . . . 1.00 6.16 2.00 771.20 Haight, .Tohn 2.00 2.00 Hevland, Benjamin . . . 3.00 Foster, Marmaduke .... 2;07 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Fowler, Benjamin (of Yon 2.00 24.41 1.00 1.00 2.00 Franklin, Ulorianna ; . . . 2.00 Hopkins, James ... 2. IX) 13.27 1.00 2.0O 1.00 1.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 Fiehl, Uobert 1.00 Hadley, Charles 2.0U 1.00 2.ro 2.00 2.00 Flneliiis, Robert 5.00 1.00 Ferris, Stei)lien 31.15 Ilarvy, James 22.51 Ilarvy, Thomas M . . . 4.00 Kowlcr, Moses 5.24 1.00 Fiirlies, Abraham Q , . . . 2.29 2.00 Flauderine, .James . . . . 1.75 Havland, Bettjamin . . . 5.i)0 Foster, Robert K 7.06 17.59 Fowler, Benjamin > . . . . 17.50 2.00 21.88 22.88 21.88 Haight, Moses . . . 1.00 21.88 Hammond, Abyah . . . . 33.00 Fowler, Philemon 14.. '59 Hallack, Robert . 2.00 Hunt, Isaac 1.00 Faile & Hall 21.85 Howard. Ward 2:^.88 Ferris, Sands & Benjamin . 2t.88 Hunt, .Toseph . •8.00 Fowler, Alexander . . . . 15.00 Haight, Oileb . 2.00 Frost, Joseph and Jacob . . 15.00 Havland, Gilbert .... 1.00 22.50 lIofTniau, Stephen B. . . . 1.00 Griffin, John 3.00 Hnstace, Joshua .... . l.OII 1.00 17.15 Griffin, Henry 4.00 21.88 Hubbard, John 21.88 Gilbert, Jacob 2.00 2.00 Halsted, Hyatt . 22..5n 4.00 Hcister & Smith . 22.50 4.00 2.88 1.00 Hoiig, Isaac & Co . . . . . 22..50 2.00 llyati, .l. seph R . . . . 15.00 H&igbt JoD&tb&D 814.59 IVIorrill Rivers $1 00 Caleb 15.00 Merritt Daniel 2 00 QBigbt Joseph 22.50 Martland, Benjamin 2.00 Hyatt, Nathaniel .... 14.59 Martin Caleb 4 00 Hyatt John .... 1.54 Martine, John ... 2 00 Hnniniond Israel ... 13.88 Mead, Joshua . . 1 00 Hunt, Stephen 17.77 2.00 Hatfield, Abraham . . . 9.74 Mead, Solomon ... 2.00 HortOD John 21 09 Mead Allen 4 00 Handford, Andrew ... . 13.66 Mandeville, James ... 26.50 Hopkins Ezra 22.26 31 rgan A b i j ah 1 00 17.24 Morgan, Moses . . , . 2 00 Horton Wright . 11.42 Morgan, Benjamin 4.00 Jay Mary 12 00 Marsh John F 2 00 Jasard . . .... Morris James 9 00 1 n gei"8el Job n ... 1.00 M orris Lew is 23 (X) Jones, William . 4.00 Morris Ricliard V 5 00 14.00 Morris Governor 14 00 Jones, Zopber. . . . . ■ 26.83 Miller James 1 00 Jarvis Jesso 2 00 Merritt, Jotham I 00 Jackson Thomas 1 O'l Merritt, Phebe 2 00 Johnston ^V'illiam ... 21.88 Mead, Martin 2 00 Jones Daniel 22 50 Mott, Richard 2 00 John Wm. S. St. 22.50 Morgan Charles I 00 John Gold St 15 82 Montross, Nathaniel . . . 2.00 Jesop Samuel 2 10 Merrit, James. . . . 17 60 Kemeyt William 2 00 McKeel Jesse 1 00 K erney J no 8 00 Miller, Hetty 1 00 K n app Sy 1 van us 1 00 Mabie, Jolin 1 OiJ Keeler Walter 1 (X) Marti in g Samuel 87 Knapp Samuel 2 00 Merry, Tliomas H 1 ou Kirby Tliouias '1 88 McKeel, Jacob 2 00 Ivipp Gilbert * • 25.27 Mead Benjamin 1 (.K) Kent Jeremiah* 1 5'' Mesier, Peter A 214 8'* Ijockwood Kichard H 11.65 Miller, John 11 G9 Leonard Abrahani 3 98 Miller James 43 00 I.>awrence^ TbomaSf Jr. 22.47 Mandeville Cornelius 11.31 Lawrence, Isttiic & Joseph 23.87 Slarshall Joseph 3 92 Lent Abstilom 21 88 Marshall, Ezra 12.9') Lynt, Jacob ..... • . 14.59 Marsha) 1 Moses 13 75 Lyon, VV. S. Jt A . . . . 22. .50 Merritt Daniel 194 05 Livin^jston, Philip I. . . l.(X) Martling John 26 75 Lyon Jonathan . . . . * 4.(X) Mortross David G Le wi^ JH ar^aret 2"^ 88 Marks Michael 2i 88 Lyon Siiiiiuel 1 00 Marks Moses I 21 88 Lewis, JatiieA 4 00 Morrel Susannah 17 50 Lockw(K>d Abraham 2.00 Mead Robert 20 5(1 Lonnybiiry, Stephen . . . 2.00 Marshall A Haight 21 88 Lyon James 1 00 Nelson, Absjilom 4 1)0 Lee Uobert P 4 00 Nash, Joseph 2 00 Lynch Oominick 9 00 Newman Noah 4 82 2.00 Odell Jonathan D o ^)Q Lee Elijah 2 00 Odel 1 Jonathan 1 00 Lockwood Ezra ..... 1.00 Odel) Jackson 4 00 Lyon Holley 1 00 Odell, Isaac. 2 00 Lei^get Thomas 9 00 Odell, Jacob . 9 00 Lawrence Thomas P. . 4.00 Oppie, John 4 00 LamontAgnOi Jacob De . 4.00 Owen, John . . 23 88 Lawrence Joel 2 00 Oakley, Isaac . 4 ()0 Lockwood Ebenezer Jr 21.88 Olmsted, David . . 1.00 14.59 Odell Jonathan 2.'J 75 LawTlnce'samber" 21 88 Oakley Charles 21 88 T 14 59 Odell, Abraham & Son 21.88 Lyon Hyatt 15 (X) 14 59 Log'^et Abrahani . 14..59 Oakley Augustus 21 88 Ijce Edwird 35 75 Odell William D 9 77 Mott Samuel C *>2 58 Odell, Daniel & Co 17.H8 4 00 Paulding, John, Jr 76,05 SIcGowen Wary 1 00 Preastly, Edward 4.00 Merritt Jonathan 2 00 l*urd v A ugustus 8 22 Merritt Robert . ... 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 2.O0 Park. Rt)ger 2.00 Miller, Richard . 1.00 Pngsley, I. and Jeremiah . 337.90 2.00 Purdy, Thomas ... . 4.00 1.00 Piigsley, S. and Jeremiah . 3NI.21 GENERAL HISTORY FROM 1783 TO 1860. 477 Piiriy, Roger ?2.(K) I'lirily, Natliaiiiel l.()0 ProvcKist, Will. S 2.00 Pino, Samuel 2.00 Park, Jee»e 1.00 Park, Jesse, Jr 1.00 Puitly, Ann 1.00 Punly,AVilliam 2.00 Purdy, fJeaniiah 1.00 Puriner, Joliu l.iK) Purdy, Thomas 4.00 Pears, Daniel 4.a) Po.-it, James 1.00 Post, Isaac 1.00 Post, Jacob I.OO Pealor. George 18..i0 P»i,'sly, Taiinan 1.00 IVipliam, William 2.00 Pell, Caleb l.OII I'unly, Timothy XilO Purily, Samuel 11.00 Punly, Elijah 1.00 Pelton, Oaniel 22.88 Pell, David I l.(X) Purdy, Ebenezer 1.00 Peck, Jerod 2.3.88 Pugsley, Hannah l.oO Punly, Isaac 4.00 Pcnfteld, Henry L W.-iO Purdy Jt Hawiey 21.88 Perry, Talraan & Monson . 55.16 Parker, Isiuic 14.59 Philips, James 24.00 Purdy Bcdle 22 50 Penfield, Henry L 17.50 PutUy, Hudd 21.88 Purdy, James H 6.-57 Kuimby, Elijah Quick, John 1.00 Quimby, William .... 3.00 Requa, Isaac 2.5.88 Reed, Aaron 4.0O Rayniuiid, Joshua 2.'iu Rapelyc, George 0.00 Byer, William 2.00 Riymond, Medad 1.00 Bundel, Samuel 2.00 Bundle, John 4.iiO Reed, Archer 2.00 Roger, David, Jr 2.00 Raymond, Henry (of Bed- ford) 25.88 Raymond, Heury (W. C.) . 1.00 Reed, Mary 1.00 Roraer, John 14. .59 Re<|ua.& Dean 21.88 Bequea, Daniel 17. .50 Bundle, Solomon 21.88 Bundle, William .... 14..59 Baymond, Seth 24 (lit Bich, Elijah 18.00 Roliertsoii, Zabud 21.88 Rider, Fowler F 21.88 Koe, Benjamin 3.56 Raymond, Enoch 7.84 Smith, Thomas G 2.MI Smith, William 2.00 Si'liureman, John Sniffen, James StraiiR, Joseph 2.IX) Str.uipc, Henry 2.00 Strang, Daniel 22.88 Btraiig, H. ami Joseph. . . 21.88 Seama -, Sylvanus 1.00 Smith. Wm H 16..59 Sherwood. Jonathan. . . . 2.00 Seymaii, Drake 2.00 Smith, John $23.88 Smith, Thomas 23.88 Smilli, Philip 23.88 Swartout, Bernardus, Jr . . 2.00 Sherwood, Bishop 4.00 Smith, Caleb, Jr 2.00 Smith, Isiuic and Jesse. . . 23.88 Styiuup, .lesper 1.00 Smith, Matson (i.OO Stning, Ebenezer 2.(»0 Strang, Samuel 4.011 Silknian, Daniel 2.110 Silkinan, John 1.00 Sutton, Wiuford 1.00 Seacoid, Daniel 1.00 Simpson, Thomivs 2.00 Soraerville, James 4.00 Slater, Wm 1.00 Shutc, Elisha 1.00 Smith, David 17.50 Shavanali, Patrick 21.88 Scofield, Ebenezer 14.59 Smith, Abel 22.50 See, Peter 21.88 Smith, Benjamin 22.50 Smith & Fish 22.50 Smith, Reuben 50.74 Schofield, Richard 2.78 Sherwood, Gilbert 5.80 Strang, Peter 2.61 Smith, Stephen 2.33 Thornton, Thomas 4.00 Titus, Rebecca 2.O0 Theal, Thomas 2.00 Theal, Billey 2,00 Tompkins, .Mexander . . . I.IKJ Tompkins, W. G 4 00 Tompkin.s, Xoah 1.00 Trip, Daniel 2.00 Thomas, .Mathow 2.00 Thorn, Samuel 4.00 Titus, Samuel 2.C0 Thomas, Thomas 2.03 Tompkins, Caleb 4.00 Tompkins, Jonathan G. . . 2.(X) Twitching, Henry 15.59 Thompson, Charles 4.00 Thomas, Tompkins .... 23.88 Titus, John, Jr 2:3.88 Theal, Hachaliah 2.00 Todd, Ira 2.00 TowDsend, John 4.(X) Todd, Abraham 2.00 Taylor, Elizabeth 4.00 Tidd, William 2.00 Tompkins, Noah B 21.88 Talt, Elias 10.59 Tompkins, G. and S. B. . . 22.50 Thorn >t Conkliu 22.50 Taft * Dreslirew 21.88 Trowbriilge, Samuel. . . . 21.81 Taylor, Samuel 90 Tcrtulus, Townsend .... l.(HJ Underbill, Solomon .... 1 (Kl Underbill, Bishop 23.88 Underhill, Nichohis .... 2.U0 Underbill, Frederick. . . . 4.(X) Underhill, Peter 4.00 Underhill, Ijiincastcr. . . . 22.88 Underhill, Gilbert 16.59 Underbill, Thomas .... 2. On Underhill, Joshua 2.00 Underhill, Caleb 2.(X) Underbill, .Vbraham I . . . I.OO Underhill, James (X. C). . 2.(K) Underhill, Jaiue3(of Soincrs) 17.25 Underhill, Roliert 2.tHi Unaernill, ■John B. x, Oo . . if 21 .88 15.00 l.(X) Unuerniil & \VeeKS . . . . 14.57 Ward, .loiiatlian 4.00 Underhill, B and J. B . . . 22.50 Watts, Robert IC.OO LnMorhill, liiibert (oi e>. . 31.7.3 2.fK) 4.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 Walker, Thomas 0.00 an Cortlandt, An^cnstus. 8.(X) 1.00 22.88 Weed, .\nania8 1 .00 2.00 White, Ebenezer J . . . . 2.00 Van Cortlandt, Pierre . , 4.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Van Cortlandt, Philip , . 6.00 Webbers, Is:uic . . . . . 2.00 16.59 Valentine, Gcrsiuim B . . 21.88 21.88 14.59 21.88 Vantastle & Sarles . . . . 110.47 Williams, John and George. 21.88 1.40 2 00 22.50 It':! .1 .... y.. 2.(X) 1.00 Williams, William 22.50 4.00 15.00 W -I T,,. — 4.(X) Williams, Elisha. . . . • , 22.50 W hitmore, fjl^'ckeah. . > 1 00 Williams, Williams (of Bed 1.00 ford) 21.88 2.00 24.09 Willett, Waite 1.00 1.40 Williams, Raymond . . , 7.92 AViUiamson, William, Jr. . 4.98 Wright, Nathaniel. . . . 4.03 2.00 8.00 Yerks, John F 21.82 Warner, William .... 1 00 37.88 Warner, John 1.00 22.50 The emancipation of the slave in Westchester County was iiiidoubtedly less a blessing to him than to his owner. Whatever may be the experience now in the more genial climate of the South, as to the ele- vation. happine.ss and increase of the colored race, after the recovery of its freedom, the result here was most disastrous. It was not, however, to the disadvan- tage of the master, for certain is it that the Westches- ter agriculturalist found himself called to more intel- ligent and remunerative tillage when relieved of the scarcely profitable help of his bondman. Such is the universal testimony. What a .-ight must have presented itself as over our three great thoroughfares, not only the farmers of the county, but often, as when the river and sound were ice-bound, those of the regions beyond passed into the city with their heavy loads of produce. There were hours of the day when the roads, it is said, were fairly blocked by the heavy traffic upon them, and eye witnesses declare that at night even the floors of the bar and sitting-rooms of the taverns were spread over with the sleepers tarrying to rest themselves and their teams for a few hours on the way. The activity thus apparent was accompanied with such improvements in the several neighborhoods as readily to attract the attention of travelers. The care taken of the highways and of the various public buildings may be seen in the town and church records. A reference to some of the private accounts shows in the repair of houses and estates a careful and yet lib- eral expenditure. It is proper here to say that about this time the HlSTOllY OF WESTCHESTBll COUNTY. i 478 Poor House of the County was built. The date of its construction is 1827. It is situated in the town of Mt. Pleasant, about five miles north of White Plains, and two miles east of Tarrytown, in a beautiful portion of the county. The farm contains one hundred and seventy-three acres, and the institution several build- ings of stone. At about the same period the State Prison at Sing Sing, in this county, was erected. It was built from 1825 to 1829, by the convicts themselves. The prison was built here because of the marble quarries upon which the labor of the convicts might be employed. It covers one hundred and thirty acres of land lying on the Hudson River, and a more healthful or beau- tiful location could not have been selected. If the eye be allowed to pass over the Table of Pop- ulation which will be found inserted at the end of this chapter, he will remark how rapid after 1835 the increase. We turn readily to the cause, and delay for moment to detail the steps taken in the construction of the railroads which afford such facilities for tra- versing the county. Public Works. — The New York and Harlem Railroad Company was incorporated by the Legisla- ture of the State of New York on the 25th of April, 1831. Audits franchises which were increased by several subsequent acts during the next eight years, covered only the City and County of New Y'ork and extended only as far as the Harlem River. The dif- ficulties which the company had here to master, were he cause of much of its embarrassment in after years. The route on Manhattan Island presented the most formidable natural obstacles, and entailed conse- quently the heaviest expenditures. On the 17th of April, 1832, the Legislature by act incorporated the New York and Albany Railroad, with a charter authorizing the construction of a road, commencing on the island of New York, where the Fourth Av- enue terminates and extending to the city of Albany. This Company not being able to avail itself of its privileges, " after six years of vicissitude and vain effort " surrendered its rights in Westchester County to the New York and Harlem Railroad. The compact made between the two companies, the Legislature in May 1840 affirmed, empowering the Harlem Com- pany to construct a bridge over the Harlem River and a railroad through Westchester County to an intersection with the New York and Albany's line of road which would be at the southern boundary of Putnam County. The first portion of the road which it was determined to build, was as far up as White Plains, and amusing enough are the limited calcula- tions made by the engineers of the day, to meet the question as to the ability of Westchester County to support a railroad. The passengers and freight from five supposed points at which they would come on the road, are figured out by one of the engineers on the basis of stage fares and tonnage prices, and the result is that $47,788 would be received from passengers and «!60.980 from freight or a total of $108,768, which it was said would fully meet all expenditures and yield a profit of at least 25 per cent, on the capital in- vested. Another engineer calculates upon an imme- diate income of $60,000, $950 of which is to come from the Catholic School at Fordham and Powell's School at Westchester. The following is another statement ventured by the President of the New York and Albany Railroad in 1838. "The town of East Ches- ter will contribute along with Kain's Marble Quarry $15,000, and six other towns of Westchester County $16,000 to support a railroad." It is safe to affirm that no one took as much interest in the construction of this road as Mr. Gouverneur Morris. The route found to be the most advantageous after leaving the Harlem, was to aim directly for Mill Brook, and thence along it to the valley of the Bronx near William's Bridge, and thence along that valley to White Plains, the whole distance being 20 miles. Here were found broad level flats above the bed of the streams avera- ging 500 feet in width, skirted by table lands of gravel 30 feet above the flat and averaging 200 feet in width, affording great facilities for grading. Rock occurs at a few points, chiefly granite and gneiss, offering stone for culverts at reasonable distances and inconsidera- ble expense. The road was constructed and in use to Fordham by October 1841 ' to William's Bridge by 1842, to Tuckchoe by July, 1844 and to White Plains later in the same year, passing through the towns of Morrisania, West Farms, Yonkers, Eist Chester, Scars- dale, Greenburg and White Plains. Says one long an employee of the road, "the first running of the trains through the county was a matter of great curiosity, and crowds of people surveyed it from the adjoining hills.'' From the report of the company in 1846, we learn that the cost of construction of six miles of road from the south side of Harlem River Bridge to William's Bridge was $38,475 per mile, while the thirteen miles of road from William's Bridge to White Plains cost $11,277 per mile. Stages from the import- ant villages, were immediately put on for the nearest stations as the work advanced. It is stated as a fact that the company suffered severely at first from the dishonesty of the conductors who collected their fares on board of the trains. The building of the road above White Plains seems to have been pro- ceeded with, after very little, if any, delay. In the report above cited the completion of the whole dis- tance is promised by May, 1847. Mr. Allan Campbell, the engineer, thus details the route chosen : " It pur- sues the valley of the Bronx for three miles, when it passes to the valley of the Saw Mill by Davis's Brook and Fly Brook . . . The Saw Mill is then fol- lowed to its head-waters, where the ridge (of high broken ground running from east to west about eight or ten miles above White Plains, the principal obsta- • Coiiimittco's Keport to Stockholders, October 15, 1841. GENERAL HISTORY FROM 1783 TO 1860. 479 cle) is passed with a cutting of only nine feet. The line now descends by the Kisco, a branch of the Croton and Muddy Brook, to Cross River; thence over broken ground between this strcann and the Croton to the valley which is occupied through the remainder of Westchester, — a very direct line has been obtained at an expense which must be regarded as moderate, only four structures of any considerable magnitude being required, one of sixty feet over the Bronx, one of eighty feet over the Titicus, one of one hundred and twenty feet over the Cross River and one of one hundred and sixty feet over the Croton at the county line — a single track with twenty-five feet width in excavations and sixteen feet at top of embankments — a substantial and permanent track over which passenger trains may be transported at great speed." The road was opened to Croton Falls in June, 1847, and passed through the towns, above White Plains, of Mt. Pleasant, Xew Castle, Bedford, Lewisboro and North Castle, and through, it is said, ninety-seven farms. The following familiar names of Westchester County have been connected with the direction of the Harlem : Gouverneur Morris, Thomas W. Ludlow, J. Warren Tompkins, Thomas H. and Edward G. Faile, John Alstyne, Samuel E. Lyon, Philip Dater, Francis W. Edmonds, Francis Eain, Lancaster Underbill, Albert Smith, William C. Wetmorc, Edward Haight, Peter Lorillard, William H. Leonard, John E. Burrill, Nathaniel P. Bailey, Augustus A. Cammann and others, of whom Gouver- neur Morris was for a while Vice-President, and Mr. Wetmore and Mr. Edmonds for short periods Presi- dents of the road. The following engineers are re- membered in connection with its construction and improvement: James J. Shipman, Mr. Shotwell, Mr. Morgan, Allan Campbell, James B. Sargent and J. C. Buckhout. The present incumbent is F. S. Curtis.' The original capital of the company was but $350,- 000, which, in 1832, was increased to $500,000, with a stipulation that the road should be completed to the Harlem River in 1835. Although this was not done, the Legislature, in the latter year, authorized the company to increase the capital to $750,000, to bor- row $400,000, and in 1839 to convert the bonds into stock. When the extension through Westchester County was begun, the^capital had been swollen to $1,950,000, and still another increase of $1,000,000 was needed to carry the road through the county. When the line was completed to Chatham Four Cor- ners, in 1852, it had cost $7,948,118, and its liabilities were over $11,000,000. In 1872 the company leased the New York and Mahopac Railroad from Golden's Bridge to Lake Mahopac, and on April 1st of that year was itself leased for four hundred and one years 'Tlic fullowing toast waa Rivuu at a celebration of ouo of the early de- velupiiieuts of the i-oiul. "The Locomotive, the ouly good motive fol- ding a iiiaii niton a ntil.'* by the New York Central and Hudson River Rail- road Company, at eight per cent, in stock and inter- est on the bonded debt. The amount of stock is $9,450,000 ; funded debt, .$10,(518.069; floating debt, $700,000— total, $20,708,009. The road now extends to Chatham, from whence it reaches Albany over the tracks of the Boston and Albany road. The New York Central and Hudson River Rail- road, which, before 1870, was the New York and Hud- son River Railroad, passes along the western shore of the county through the towns of King's Bridge (now in the city of New York), Yonkers, Greenburgh, Mt. Pleasant, Ossining and Cortlandt — a distance of about thirty miles. The charter was obtained from the Legislature in May, 1846, but although the import- ance of the construction of the road was urged in the newspapers of the day,'^ the work was not actually commenced until the middle of the succeeding year. Meanwhile the company had appointed as chief en- gineer, Mr. John B. Jervis, a gentleman of large ex- perience, and who proved throughout admirably fitted for the arduous duties that fell on him. The com- pany at this time, it seems, complained that they were not met in a fair and equitable spirit by the owners of the land through which the road would pass, " who would derive," it was said, " far greater benefit than the company itself could expect." In the summer of 1847 the route which Mr. Jervis deemed it highly important should follow closely the river, and which had been divided into sections, was placed under con- tract, and by November all the contractors on the line of the road had commenced work and the desire was to push it forward with all speed Mr. Jervis, by the following remark in his reporc of January, 1848, indicates his own anxiety : " The contractors cannot induce men to work at night." But the men were found as untractable, when national feuds sprang up among them, and efforts were made to drive each other from the line. This rioting between the "Corkonians and the Far Downs " delayed, of course, the work. But obstacles unavoidable occurred, which, in a large measure were owing to the proximity of the road to the river, adverse winds and tides often hindering the workmen. From the same cause in the cuttings which were found at points very hard, much trouble was occasioned by the flow of the water into the crevices in the rock. The board, however, at the in- stigation of the engineers did everything it could to encourage the contractors, adopting the principle of making allowances when unforeseen difficulties were presented in the execution of the work. " The plan of grading," says Mr. William C. Young, who became, in 1849, chief engineer, " for the road- bed south of Poughkeepsie was for a double track, having a width of twenty-six feet in rock-cuttings, twenty-two feet in tunnel cuttings and twenty-four feet between bridge abutments. The embankments 2 See iovrnulnf Commerce, JuDuaiy 0, 1874. 480 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. have been designed thirty feet wide, having a wide margin of ten feet between the face of the river-wall and the west rail of the track. These dimensions have been carried out in the construction of the road- bed as nearly as could be done consistently with an early ojjening of the road for public use." On the 29th of September, 1849, passenger travel over the road as far as Peekskill was commenced. At this time Mr. Jervis became Consulting Engi- neer of the company. The average number of pas- sengers per day for the first month (October) was eight hundred and thirty, and the total number twenty-one thousand five hundred and ninety-three ; and for the next month (November) the average num- ber was ten hundred and fifty-five, and the total num- ber twenty-seven thousand four hundred and forty-one. At this time it was calculated that the land taken for the roadway in Westchester County had cost the com- pany, exclusive of agencies and other charges, $185,- 905.02, and also that the grading had involved an expenditure of not far from a million of dollars, which was about three hundred thousand dollars above the cost as estimated by the original lettings in 1847. The first train conductors on this road were J. D. Elliot and H. E. Newell. Of the many interesting incidents in the early his- tory of the running over the road in this county, none perhaps created more of a sensation than the double accident just above Croton, on the 4th of December, 1851. It seems that the four o'clock afternoon train from New York was stopped by the conductor (Carey) to put off two men who would not pay their fare, and was run into by an engine without cars, and five or six passengers were severely injured. But the five o'clock express train (Morgan's) which followed, having switched off" to the west track, on coming abreast of the wrecked train halted to render assistance, and while so doing was run into by the five and a-half Peekskill train (Nichols), which had also taken the west track, but was driving ahead heedless of danger at the usual speed. Here again others were hurt, some very seriously. The company exhibited on the occasion great concern for the sufferers, and visited with prompt punishment the offending officials. The Vanderbilt influence came into control of the New York and Hudson River Railroad in 1864, but the road between New York and Albany was operated independently of the Central Railroad until 1870, when, in accordance with the legislative act of No- vember, 1869, authorizing a consolidation of the whole interest between New York, Buffalo and Sus- pension Bridge, the consolidated organization as- sumed the title of the New York Central and Hud- son River Railroad Company. The Hudson River road cost, to build and equip, $78,014,954, or $76,272 per mile of track. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad extends through the county, making a junction with the Harlem, at Washiugtouville in the town of East Chester, and so passes into the city. It runs in its course from the Connecticut line through the towns of Rye, Harrison, Mamaroneck, New Rochelle, Pelham and East Chester, covering a distance of 13.61 miles. The work of constructing this part of the road was carried on during the years 1847 and 1848. On Christmas day, 1848, a party of gentlemen made an excursion over it from New York to New Haven, returning the next day. The road was opened for business on the following day. The character of the ground of the road in this county is described as "heavy with rough heavy cuttings." It was at first a single track road. The line as surveyed was fol- lowed. AtPelhamvillethe original embankment was as it is now. The numerous curves on the road were caused by the restricted financial condition, making it necessary, as far as possible, to avoid cuttings and embankments. The desire had been to build the road in a substantial and permanent manner, but it was found difficult to complete it in any shape. Mr. Sidney S. Miller, one of the original contractors and most active of the projectors of the road, is still living at Madison, N. J. It is a curious fact that when the trains first commenced to run, the passengers were booked as in the old stage-coach times, their names being duly reported by the conductors to the com- pany. This company was originally " The New York and New Haven," but in 1872 was consolidated with the Hartford and New Haven Company, and the new system took the name by which it is now known. In 1873 the company leased the Harlem River and the Port Chester Railroad, between the Harlem and New Rochelle, and opened it for use. It runs from its depot at the Harlem River through the t iwns of Morrisania, Westchester, Pelham and New Rochelle, where it joins the New Haven road. It is sometimes denominated, the Harlem River Branch of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad, and has opened out one of the most beautiful portions of the county. In the spring of 1872, the work of construction began by filling in the bulkhead at the Harlem River, and a fine dock and slip of land was formed. Blasting had to be done on the Morris es- tate where rock of a lava-like appearance was found, and seams and colors of the same in fine curves, angles, etc. The pile building came in for a share of careful attention, as after passing Port Morris piles of sixty and eighty feet in length were used, which made a substantial job throughout. The rock cutat Hunt's Point bridge caused a great deal of trouble on ac- count of the wet, spongy nature of the soil, — one would have expected the softest nearest the water. The Bronx River was bridged by a strong Jackknife Draw. Filling for embankment across Pelham Salt Marsh was a tedious job, as firm bottom was hard to find. East Chester Bay reached a fine piece of work was done in building the pile-bridging across it. Too much praise cannot be given to E. W. Reid, General Superintendent of the New York, New Haven and GENERAL HISTORY FROM 1783 TO ISGO. 481 Han ford Railroad Company, for the substantial and workmanlike manner in which as the whole job, so especially the erection of the piers and approaches of the fine pivot drawbridge was conducted. The stone for the masonry, of the very first quality, was furnished by the veteran Mr. Beattie, of Stony Creek, Conn. Borrow pits were necessary on Bartow embankments and at Timpsons. As material for them was lack- ing on the wdiole line, ballast, except the broken stone ballast, was brought from as far as New Canaan. The construction of the fresh water swamp trestle ended the work that was of any size or account before reaching the junction with the main line, near New Rochelle village. The contractors were, Sections one and two, Peter Sanford & Co. ; sections two, three and foun Dunn & Lowther ; sections six and seven, Beattie & Edwards; sections eight, nine and ten, Richard Dooley. Under Mr. Reid's care the whole line has been since improved in every way and ranks first class. The stations along this road are Port Morris, Casa- nova, Hunt's Point, West Farms, Van Nest, West- chester, Timpsons, Baychester, Bartow, Pelham Manor and New Rochelle Junction. The road is 12.13 miles in length. New Yokk City and Northern Railroad. — This road has reached its present condition and as- sumed its present name after having passed through a very varied experience, and been known under several different titles. The pereons with whom the idea originated were John Q. Hoyt and Andrew McKin- ney, who were instrumental in organizing what was known as the New York and Boston Railroad, in 1871. Of this organization John Q. Hoyt was presi- dent, and Andrew McKinney, treasurer. The road was to run from New York to Brewsters, in Putnam County, and was there to connect with roads leading to Boston. The larger part of the right of way was purchased, considerable grading done, and a portion of the track was laid, but much of the right of way was obtained under conditions which were never sat- isfied, and the land reverted to its original owners. In 1871 a combination was formed between this road, the Dutchess and Columbia Railroad and the Harlem Extension, the consolidation being known as the New York, Boston and Montreal Railroad. Under this new organization, of which George H. Brown was president, large loans were negotiated in Europe, the principal creditor being the Franco- Egyptian Bank of Paris, and Bishop Scheim and T. Gold Schulz of London, who advanced several millions of dollars; but the foreclosure of prior mortgages, and the sale of the road rendered these advances a complete loss, and a suit has long been pending in the United States Courts to determine the j)crsonal responsibility of the trustees who had the handling of the funds. At the time of the sale under foreclosure, the road was purchased by the former bond-holders, and was reorganized under its present name, in 1878. The rat president was A. B. Stout, who shortly after re- 45 signed and was succeeded by Robert M. Galloway, who has retained the position till the present time. The first secretary was Calvin Goddard, who still holds the position. When the road was built, its New York terminus was at High Bridge, but an ex- tension, something over a mile in length, connects with the Eighth Avenue Elevated Road. This ex- tension was made under a separate organization known sis " the West Side and Yonkers Railroad," and furnishes the most direct road for rapid transit between New York and the interior of Westchester County. At the time of the organization of the present company, a contract was made with Louis Rob- erts, to finish the building, and to equip the road. This task was performed by Mr. Roberts in a most active and energetic manner. The right of way was repurchased, the grading finished, and the track laid and the completed road opened for business in the spring of 1881. The length of this road from High Bridge to Brewsters (Putnam County) is fifty-three miles, and the length of the extension from High Bridge to Eighth Avenue is one and one-sixteenth miles. The benefit of this road to the property holders along its entire length can scarcely be over- estimated. The general superintendent and the heart and soul of the enterprise is Mr. Frank S. Gannon, whose whole life has been identified with railroad manage- ment. Mr. G.innon was born in Spring Valley, Rock- land C.)uiity, N. Y., but removed to Orange County when a boy. He became connected with the Erie Railroad in 1867, as telegraph operator and agent at various stations. In 1870 he became connected with the Midland Railroad where he remained till 1875, when he went to the Long Island Railroad as tele- graphic train dispatcher and master of transportation, and the value of his services were fully recognized by all who had any connection with that road. Mr. Gannon became connected with the Northern Railroad in April, 1881, construction trains being the only ones then running. The bridge over Harlem River was finished May 1, and passenger trains began running to Brewsters on that day, and in the Fall of that year the road was finished and in good condition. The road was laid through a sparsely settled district and during the first year trains were run at a loss, but from that time to the present the business has been constantly increasing and has now reached large pro- portions. As an illustration, we may mention that in the Summer of 1881, five hundred cans of milk were brought daily to the city, and at the present time the number is one thousand and five hundred. The New York Central & Harlem Railroads did not at first consider the new road as a competitor, but soon had reason to change their views, and after a war of rates they were glad to make arrangements with the new company. The road has a lea.se of pier 44, New York City, and cars can now be run 482 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. from this road to all portions of the country without breaking bulk. When they first began transporting cars upon floats, three or four cars a day was consid- ered a good business, while thirty or forty are now carried in the same length of time. As one item we may mention that three hundred tons of ore are daily brought from the Tilly Foster mine and other mines along the road, and coal is brought direct from the mines of Pennsylvania to the central portions of Westchester County without change of cars. Under Mr. Gannon's careful management the direction of trains has been so perfect that no accident from col- lision has occurred since the road commenced running, while the rapid increase of business both in freight and passenger traffic must continue to increase to an indefinite extent. The value of the.«e facilities for communication with the city, and of the towns and villages with each other, which these one hundred miles at least of rail coaching in the county affords can scarcely be estimated whether we look to the addition of inhabi- tants or the increase in the value of real estate. This has indeed been attended by a great reduction in the amount of its agricultural productions. Taking the average of crops of the whole county the yield is found to be about two-fifths less than that of forty years ago — before this immigration. The following table will present to the eye the steady decrease which has taken place in this direction since the opening out of this region as a place of residence for business men : 1839. 1»54. 1874. 1879. Wheat . . . 35,267 3.'j,248 24,426 22,698 Kye 99,574 51,404 57.0J9 55,130 Oats 449,090 204,759 173,894 238,509 Corn 318,028 402,2381^ 323,076 377,357 Potatoes .... 620,920 286,249 334,966 326,092 Hay 77,873 90,496% 73,113 69,221 Buckwheat. . . 57,226 20,89t^ 13,364 Wool 52,085 6,069 From this exhibit of decline we turn to mark the increase in the value of the real and personal estate of the county. In the year 1840 the aggregate value was $10,650,064; in the year 1860, $41,527,907, and in 1884 $73,860,487. These values, if viewed by their proportions to the entire estate values of the State of New York in the three years named, show how much the County has kept up its relative financial consequence, notwith- standing the immense growths of the great cities and the subtractions from 1874 of the values of the three towns of Kingsbridge, Morrisania and West Farms. The total equalized estate value of the State in 1840 was $639,171,000, in 1860 $1419,- 297,520 and in 1884 $3,014,591,372, the proportion being to that of the county in 1840 as 60 to 1, in 1860 as 34 to 1 and in 1884 as 41 to 1. This it is believed could be even more strongly presented. But while thus noticing the great increase in wealth, it is more of a satisfaction to observe the accom- panying advantages moral and intellectual. The schools of the county have been brought up to a standard which will compare favorably with the most approved. Institutions of an eleemosynary character have been organized and opportunities for mental culture, additional to those which proximity to the city affords, are devised and well supported. By the increase of churches and of religious ministrations the spiritual necessities of the people are subserved. Reference also should be made to the newspaper of the county, which has had a usefulness which cannot but with injustice be undervalued. It is a pleasure to speak, with the confidence of due consideration, of the skill and ability which has been displayed in its man- agement, to which is added regret that the files of the more than fifty journals published in the county in the last seventy-five years have not been more care- fully preserved. Not only, in consequence, have in- teresting facts been lost, but the subjects from time to time moving the public mind are not so easily recalled or understood. The first known newspapers of this County were started in the same year, 1810, — the Somers J/uaeMm, published by Milton F. Gushing, and the Westchester Gazette, by Robert Crombie. It would appear that the Sing Sing Republican is the legitimate successor of this Westchester Gazette. The Eastern State Journal and the Highland Democrat, (formerly Westchester and Putnam Democrat,) both started in 1845, claim rank next for age, succeeded by the two Yonkers papers, the Gazette (at first Herald) of 1852 and the Statesman (formerly Westchester iS'ewa) of 1853. With reference to these newspapers, as also to the many others, which will be named in the history of the several towns it is but right to declare how well, for purposes of information, intellectual advant- age, and amusement, the wants of these localities and of adjoining ones have been met by these bene- factors. Political History. — The period between the declaration of peace and the adoption of the Federal Constitution in 1789 was marked in Westchester County by little of concerted and united action in reference to the politics of the State or National governments. In 1784 Gen. Pierre Van Cortlaiidt, of the town of Cortlandt, was Lieutenant-Governor of the State, and Generals Lewis Morris, of Morrisania, and Stephen Ward, of East Chester, were in the State Senate. Gen. Thomas Thomas, of Rye, was in the Lower House, having as his colleagues Philip Pell, Jr., of Pelham, Abijah Gilbert, of Salem, Ebenezer Purdy, of North Salem, Zebediah Mills, and Samuel Haight, sterling men in the trying times just past. The next year's election substituted Ebenezer Bur- ling, of East Chester, and Ebenezer Lockwood, of Poundridge, in place of Messrs. Mills and Haight. In 1786 Jonathan G.Tompkins of Scarsdale, ancSamuel Drake were chosen instead of Burling and Purdy, and in 1787 Jonathan Rockwell, Joseph Strang, and^ Ebenezer Purdy, (who was again returned,) took ihc GENERAL HISTOllY FKOM 1783 TO 18G0. 483 seals of Drake, Gilbert and of Pell, (who had become Surrogate.) The Hon. Richard Morris, of Scnrsdale, had been Chief Justice of the State since 1779, and John Thomas, of Rye, or Jesse Hunt, of Westchester, sheriffs since 1777. Richard Hatfield, of White Plains, was Surrogate from 1778 till 1787. In the list of su- pervisors of the county from 1783 to 1789 occur at least half a dozen of the names of the county officials just given, and to these may be added the following conspicuous members of the Board: Benjamin Stev- enson, of New Rochelle, also one of the Judges of the County; Gilbert Budd, of Rye ; Abel Smith, of North Castle; Hachaliah Browne and Thaddeus Crane, both of Upper Salem; Daniel Horton, of White Plains; James Hunt, of East Chester; William Miller, of Harrison; James Kronkhite, of Ryker's Patent, or Cortlandt; and Philip Pell, of Pelham, who vras, in 1787, also sheriff of the county. From these details may be gathered a conception of the leadership in the political affairs of the County during the period im- mediately succeeding the Revolution. The first political differences of a serious nature which arose in the State sprang up as the generally realized insufficiency of the government by a Confed- eracy brought forth various plans for the increase of its powers and efficiency. It was felt that the union of the States was merely in name, when the credit which that union established was at the mercy of the States in their capricious dealings with it. To the disappointment keenly enough felt by the enthusiastic friends of the Revolution was added a mortifying sense of the apparent fulfillment of the predictions of the enemies of the Republic, that the whole movement would prove a failure, not more from its own folly than from the incompetency of the untaught and inexperienced movers in it. In speak- ing of John Hancock and Samuel Adams, one of the Loyalist newspapers says : " When the lunacies of the former are separated from the villanies of the latter, the deluge of destruction that is certainly, though slowly, rolling after them will rapidly come on and .overwhelm them and their infatuated votaries in pro- digious ruin." Here in this County, where the" West- chester County Farmer" had poured forth his entreat- ies and forebodings in view of the uprising against the British authority, the anxiety for the success of the new government could not but be intensified by these recollections, and by the daily contact with the many who had anticipated disa-ster. But notwithstanding all this desire to avoid a failure, there was a deep feeling that the safety of the people's rights was and would be much better secured under the more readily iDVokcd protection of the State than under the dis- tant care, with distracting — oftentimes contradicting — interests, of a General Government. The head of the State of New York at this time was George Clinton, its great war Governor, who, by his popularity, as much as by his office, was possessed of great influence \with the people. While professing a sincere desire for the continuance of the then Federal compact, and for its usefulness, and that the General Government should inspire respect at home and abroad, Governor Clinton resisted with ardor and firmness the making of any concessions which should weaken the State au- thority or further abridge its powers. The influence of his position and arguments on the public mind can readily be seen. But still abler and more practiced pens and voices were showing into what a pitiable condi- tion public affairs were running. General Schuyler, Chief Justice Livingston, John Jay and Alexander Hamilton were setting forth and urging the necessity for a change. Another call, more commanding the country over, was heard from Virginia, suggesting that the powers of the central government be increased. In the convention which met at Philadelphia this county shares indeed with the State at large in the honor of being represented by General Hamilton, but it is a pleasure to remember that in the person of G uverneur Morris (a distinguished and influential delegate from Pennsylvania), who was born on West- chester soil and who returned again to represent her in the United States Senate, and whose remains are sacredly enshrined in her bosom, she was present to form that wise and beneficent instrument. The Con- stitution thus offered to the States for adoption met with the fiercest opposition. Not only were its fea- tures faulted, but the conduct of the Convention in transcending, as asserted, its powers, was fiercely as- sailed. " Instead of amending the Constitution," said Mr. Jones, " it had framed one." In Albany the new Constitution was publicly burned. In the choice of delegates to a convention which was now ordered to meet at Poughkeepsie, to pass upon its adoption by the State, the greatest excitement prevailed, and the terms Federalist and Anti-Federalist, as applied to separate parties, began to be used. The result in Westchester County proved that a deep interest was felt in the maintenance of a union between the States. Thaddeus Crane, of North Salem, Richard Hatfield, of White Plains, Philip Livingston and Lewis Morris, of Westchester, Lott W. Sarles, of New Castle, and Philip Van Cortlandt were chosen over their Anti-Federalist opponents by very large majorities. The Convention met, and on the 26th of July, by a vote of thirty to twenty-seven, ratified the proposed Constitution. In the affirmative vote are found the names of all the Wettchester delegates. At the election for members of Assembly the strong party feeling is manifested by a complete change in the representation, the following persons, strong Federalists, being returned : Thaddeus Crane, of North Salem ; Jonathan Horton and Philip Livings^ ton, of Westchester; Judge Nathan Rockwell, of Lewisboro ; Walter Seaman and General Philip Van Cortlandt. At the assembling of the Legislature in December, however, such was the political complex* ion of the two Houses that the five delegates to repre* sent the State in the Continental Congress were 484 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. chosea from the Auti-Federal party, one of the five being Philip Pell, of this county. The satisfactory working of the new Constitution, the popularity of Washington's administration and the great advan- tages which the proximity of the seat of govern- ment to this county was offering, were all favor- able to the Federal party. Majorities in its favor continued through the succeeding ten years, in which two of the elections held — -those of 1792 and 1796— had a direct bearing on national politics. Washing- ton entered without dissent upon a second term of of- fice, General Stephen Ward, of East Chester, being one of the electors of this State and in 1797, John Adams, with the twelve votes of the State of New York, was chosen in opposition to Mr. Jefferson. At the elec- tion in 1798 there were plain indications of a falling away of the strength of the administration party throughout the State, which, although not borne out by the result the next year, were more than realized at the Presidential contest of 1800. Among the elec- tors chosen by the Legislature was Colonel Pierre Van Cortlandt, Jr., of this county, who had married a daughter of ex-Governor George Clinton, still the leader of the Republican party in the State. General Thomas, of Rye, an active Republican, who had been out of the Assembly for some years, is again restored to it. The hold thus taken upon the popular vote was retained with much tenacity during the whole period of Mr. Jefferson's administration. The coun- try was on the high road of prosperity. All interests shared in the general thrift. The ruling party must naturally benefit from such favoring circumstances. Its leading men in Westchester County in these days of Jefferson rule, besides Judge Thomas and Colonel Van Cortlandt, were Senator Ebenezer Purdy, of North Saiem ; Abijah Gilbert, of Salem ; and Jona- than Ward, of East Chester. The position of Senator Purdy was also a commanding one in the Republican party at large. In 1802 he was a member of the Council of Appointment, in whose hands was the po- litical patronage of the State. In 1803, as chairman of the caucuses of the Republican members of the State Senate, he exercised a commanding influence in securing the nomination of General Morgan Lewis and preventing that of Aaron Burr as the standard bearer of the Republican party in the State in the election for Governor. There is no doubt that the movement which forced his re.nignation of his seat in 180C arose from the knowledge of his devotion to Governor Lewis, whose prestige and strength it was thought desirable to destroy. It would seem that General Thomas, who was transferred from the House to the Senate in 1804, was in perfect accord with Mr. Purdy, and being himself a member of the Council of Appointment in 1806, joined with his associates in removing De Witt Clinton, the pronounced opponent of Governor Lewis, from the mayoralty of the city of New York. An event of much pride to the county in 1806 was the election of Daniel D. Tompkins to be Governor of the State. Mr. Tompkins, although never represent- ing Westchester County in official position, having in early life made New York City his home, was, never- theless, a native of it, having been born at Scarsdale, and being a descendant of one of the first settlers of the adjoining town of East Chester. His father, Jonathan G. Tompkins, had represented the county in the legislative body, which adopted the first State Constitution in 1777, and also in the convention which framed the second in 1801. He was a member of the Assembly during the Revolution, and several years after the close of the war. He was also for along period a Judge of the county, and at the time of his son Daniel's election as Governor he had been for twenty-one years a Regent of the University of the State. The opponent of Daniel D. Tompkins was Governor Lewis, the Federalists in this, as in the previous election, not setting up any candidate from their own ranks. It is a gratification to record the promotion at this same time to the State Senate of Jonathan Ward, of East Chester, a son of General Stephen Ward, of earlier fame and usefulness. In the year 1807 questions arose which, in their bearings on political parties, involved more than personal considerations. The British government, with its usual total indifference to the rights of other nations when its own interests are involved, adopted an order by which trade between its enemies and neutral powers was forbidden. France, in its turn, issued decrees which had the same result. The United States having expostulated with these governments to no effect. Congress, at the instigation of Mr. Jefferson, passed an Embargo Act upon all vessels within the limits of the United States. No clearances were to be furnished, and vessels sailing from one port of the United States to another therein were required to give bonds that the goods with which they were laden should be landed in some port in the United States. The object of this bill, in the language of Mr. Madison, was to make it " the interest of all nations to change the system which has driven our commerce from the sea." " Great Britain will feel it (this em- bargo) in her manufactures, in the loss of naval stores, and ... in the supplies essential to her colonies." " France will feel it in the loss of all which she has hitherto received through our neutral commerce, and her colonies will be cut off from the sale of their productions and the source of their supplies." "They have forced us into the measure by the direct effect on us of measures founded in an alleged regard for their own eventual safety and essential interests." "TJie ocean presents a field only where no harvest is to be reaped but that of danger, of spoliation, and of dis- grace." * It will be readily understood that this mea- sure, bearing so hardly upon the interests of all classes 1 National Inteliigencer , Dec. 23, 1807. Hist. Magazine, Nov. 1873, p. 315. GENERAL HISTORY FROM 1783 TO 1860. 485 of the community must have called forth the most violent objection and put to the severest strain the devotiiin of the Republican party to their great Head, the President, and to his destined successor, the then Secretary of State. The Representative in Congress from this District, General Philip Van Cort- landt, voted against the Embargo, and was drawn into opposition to Mr. Madison's aspirations. It is certain also that the Vice-President, George Clinton, did not apitrove of the "Act." But notwithstanding their dissatisfaction, these gentlemen still adhered to their party affinities, and by their course, no doubt, greatly counteracted the tendency of these measures to pro- duce political changes among their followers in New York. So their columns seem not to have seriously wavered in Westchester County at the next Senatorial election, when the Southern District, which lay in New York City, Long Island, Staten Island and Westchester County, elected both the Republican candidates. In the selection of Presidential electors, which soon followed, the fact that the difference on this point in the party was regarded of no moment is apparent in the concession i>f six votes to George Clinton, one of whom in all likelihood was Mr. White, of Westchester County. The Embargo bill was re- pealed before the close of Mr. Jefferson's adminis- tration, and in place of it was enacted what has been entitled " the Non-intercourse Law," which f(>rbade both importation and exportation. This change, in connection with fresh evidences of English animosity, seems to have had the effect to intensify the national feeling, and the consequence was, in 1810, an over- whelming defeat of the Federalists in all portions of the State. But the divisions in the Republican party that succeeded this victory gave their opponents the opportunity in the Presidential contest two years after to decide to which of the Republican candidates should fall the vote of the State, and the suffrages were given to De Witt Clinton. Mr. Madison was, however, re-elected. General Van Cortlandt ardently supported Mr. Clinton; but Governor Tomjikins, though unwilling to be regarded as inimical to him, yet felt himself bound to support Mr. Madison as the representative not only of the national Democracy, but of the meas- ures which Congress had adopted for the maintenance of the national honor. But Mr. Clinton would allow of no half-way support. The consequence was that the difference soon shaped itself in the State as be- tween these two favorite citizens, and it needed but little time to prove that the largest sympathies were with the farmer's boy, as the Governor was styled. Mr. Tompkins is described as a man of much more than ordinary intellectual strength and culture, but is better remembered for a cordiality and kindliness of manner that gave him great acceptablenesa and influence in his public and private relations. In the year 181.5 Mr. Jonathan Ward, who had represented ^Westchester County in the State Senate, was sent as member of Congress to Washington, and there is little doubt that this election had much political signifi- cance, from Mr. Ward's known opposition to Mr. Clinton. When the Presidential choice was to be made of a successor to Mr. Madison, it was evident that the choice lay between Mr. James Monroe and Governor Tompkins. The preferences of Mr. Madi- son had much weight with the Republican i)arty, and Mr. Monroe was elected, with Governor Tompkins as Vice-President. With the removal of this gentleman to Washington, the fortunes of De Witt Clinton re- vived, and the Republicans naming him, he wa.s, almost without opposition, elected Governor of the State. But the truce in party dispute, so welcome, was but the precursor of a contest in the State, and in the County of Westchester, of uncommon bitter- ness. It might be right hereto state that the cham- pionship by Mr. Clinton of the measures for the con- struction of the Erie Canal, the importance of which was the more evident as the work progressed, gave him an increased hold upon the confidence of the people. This however was more immediately felt in the neighborhoods to be benefited than in others, as Westchester County, where the influence could only be indirect. " It was a deceitful calm," says the historian of " New York Politics," speaking of Mr. Clinton's all but unanimous election. The elevation of one so re- gardless of party restraints was a bitter realization to the extreme Democracy. The Federalists, in their turn, in expectation of some advantage, were only too glad to revive the old controversies, and Mr. Clinton was inclined, in his party conduct, to draw the line as between his personal friends and opponents. In Westchester County the election for Senators, in the spring of 1819, was carried on with great animation. Mr. John Townsend, of East Chester, who had been, a year or two before, a member of the Lower House, was elected Senator in opposition to Pierre Van Cort- landt, the Clinton candidate. It was at this timetliHt the significant name, "Bucktail," designating the opponents of Mr. Clinton, sprang into use. To the Tammany Society, a secret political organization of New York City, this gentleman was particularly odious, and, as one of the insignia of this " order " was the tail of the deer worn in their hats, the other party soon ap]>lied the term to all who sympathized with them in their feelings and action. The buck- tail, an emblem of success in the chase, was gladly appropriated by the Anti-Clintonians and became the favorite decoration in each political campaign. It must have been somewhere about this time that the following incidents, related in a Journal of a trip to visit Chief Justice Jay and General Philip Van Cort- landt, occurred : " We now found ourselves in the town of North Castle, the inhabitants of which were assembled at this time to choose their officers. We discovered that they were all Bucktails. My friend, whose enthusiasm counterbalances his prudence, ven- 486 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. tured on the hopeless task of converting them to Clintonism. Accordingly, having singled out one who appeared to be the deceutest man among them, he led him into a long argument, by which to con- vince him that Tompkins was a defaulter, and conse- quently unfit to be entrusted with the highly respon- sible office of chief magistrate of this great State. That the Bucktail, in his attempt to prove the im- maculate purity of the man of his party, was foiled by the superior address and ingenuity of his antago- nist, is not saying that he was convinced." We give this other extract from the journal — " ' Who is this? ' whispered I. 'Dr. C k, the sheriff of the county,' replied my companion, ' and a warm Clintonian.' 'And you, doctor, I am glad to see you, too; how goes the election?' Here a dialogue commenced on the topic next to the heart of these two men, who^ alike forgetful of the rain, which now began to fall, . . . these two mad politicians kept up their jab- ber a full half-hour, cold, wind and rain notwith- standing." Another extract — " A few minutes suf- ficed to bring us to the ancient seat of the Van Cort- landts. ... I had not another opportunity of drawing Hannibal into the recital of his campaigns till the hour of retiring ; his attention was wholly occupied by Cooper and his plans for bringing in De Witt Clinton." Notwithstanding the fact that Governor Clinton was re-elected in 1820, a deadly blow was the actual result, for both to the Senate and Assembly pro- nounced majorities against him were returned. Mr. Tompkins, who had been brought out to oppose Mr. Clinton, had a majority of three thousand two hundred and thirty-one in the Southern Senatorial District, which included Westchester County. The address at this election of a body of Federalists, which, it is asserted, had very little influence with the main force, is here recalled, because on the list of signatures to it the first is that of a greatly respected citizen of Mamaroneck, Peter Jay Munro, a lawyer of much eminence in this county, and because the list includes also that of James A. Hamilton, son of General Hamilton, long a resident of Tarrytown, on the Hudson. The significance of this paper was not only its open assault on the friends of Governor Clinton for their devotion to him, but in this galvanic disj^lay of the death scene of the distinguished party to which they had belonged, the signers sought their own future political advancement. It is proper here to say that for two successive terms the Third Congressional District of the State, which consisted of Rockland and Westchester, was ably and faithfully represented by Mr. Caleb Tomp- kins, of White Plains, and that for three years, from 1820 to'1823, the position of County Judge was held by William Jay, son of the Chief Justice. The great political event which now falls under notice is the assembling of the convention ordered for the revision of the State Constitution, and the pres- ence in it of three distinguished citizens of the county, all members of its bar — Peter A. Jay, Peter J. Munro and Jonathan Ward. It would seem that whatever the motive elsewhere, the political did not enter in the selections thus made in Westchester County. Governor Tompkins was called to preside over the convention, and in the appointment of committees it is a matter of no little honor to Westchester that Mr. Monroe was made chairman of the committee on the judiciary department and Mr. Ward a member of that on the council of revision. One of the marked periods in the debates of this body was that in which the right of the colored population to vote at elec- tions was discussed. The question was handled very dispassionately, but Mr. Jay's speech appears to have been one of the very ablest on the subject. By far the severest work of the convention was the consideration of the report of the Judiciary committee, when strong political feeling was aroused. The question really was the deposition of the old Judges. Mr. Munro, although assisted by Mr. Van Buren, struggled un- successfully to prevent the sweeping change. At the session of the Legislature following the con- vention. Senator John Townsend, of East Chester, was made a member of the Council of Appointment, the sessions of which were the last held in the State, its powers passing by the new Constitution to the Governor and the Senate. Mr. Townsend, at the next election in the county, was made its Sheriff and Mr. John Hunter, of Pelham, was returned under the new apportionment one of the four Senators of the Second Senatorial District. In 1824, in the list of Presidential electors, the last selected by the Legis- lature, are the names of the two brothers John and James Drake, both natives of Westchester County, the first residing in New York, but the latter on his estate at East Chester. As well-known, the election for President was thrown into the House of Representatives, where Mr. John Quincy Adams, after several ballotings, was elected, Mr. Joel Frost, of Putnam (bounty, the mem- ber from the Fourth Congressional District, giving his vote to William H. Crawford, of Georgia, then Secre- tary of the Treasury. The following detailed statement of the Electoral vote of Westchester County, beginning with the year 1828, will give a fair idea of the political opinions of the citizens of Westchester County from that date to the present time : ELECTORAL VOTE OF WESTClIESTEtt COUNTY. Year. Name of political Name of candidate. Number party. of votes. 1828 Andrew Jackson 3788 Jolin Qiiincy Adams 315.3 1832 Democratic Andrew Jackson 3133 Whig. . ■ Henry Clay 2293 183G Democratic Martin Van Buren .... 3009 Wbig VVni. H. 1 arrison 1749 Scattering 287 GENERAL HISTORY 4118a 4412 Whig 4258 2146 Whig 4:il2 FioeSoil .... 1312 5283 Whig 4(133 61 4600 Whig ■UM 3641 . . . Johu Bell . 8100 Ropuhlican . . . 6771 1864 Domocratic. . . . . . Geo. B. McCloUan 9353 7593 11,667 9641 1872 Domocratic. . . 11 112 10,223 1876 Democratic. 12,050 Rppiiblican . . . . . . Rutherford 1!. Hayes . . . . 9574 11,858 11,367 1:1 524 Republican . . . . . . James G. Blaiue 11,286 435 In referring to thethirty years before Mr. Lincoln's election, some of the facts and events are important and interesting enough for record and consideration. General Aaron Ward of Sing Sing was, six times elected a member of Congress fulfilling his duties to the eminent satisfaction of his constituents and the pride of his neighbors. General Ward was an officer of the War of 1812, and for some years Brigadier General of the Fifteenth Brigade and Fourth Division of the Militia of the State. In the convention in 1846, for amending the constitution. General Ward represented the county and was made chairman of the committee on the militia and military officers. Mr. John Hunter of Hunter's Island, Pelham, in 1823, for one year, and from 1836, for eight years Senator from Westchester, was a man of large wt-alth and high social position and an affable and a considerate gen- tleman. He was a very strong supi)<)rt(!r of Mr. Van Buren, during whose administration Mr. Philip Schuyler, a brother-in-law of Mr. Hunter and a resi- dent of this county for many years held the con- sulship at London. Mr. Hunter was also a member of the constitutional convention ofl84C. Mr. Allen McDonald of White Plains held a seat in the Senate for two terms and is said to have been exceedingly popular. In 1836, he was appointed Adjutant General of theState. Mr. William Nelson, of Peekskill, who commenced his political career by two terms in the Assembly, in 1819 and 1820, had already in 1815 been district attorney of the Eleventh District and was again in 1822 of the county. From 1824 to 1828, Mr. Nelson was State Senator and from 1847 to 1851 the member of Congress from this District. In all these positions Mr. Nelson merits the approbation due for faithful service. He died in 86(5 or ]8()7. FROM 1783 TO I860. 487 The Anti-Masonic excitements at such a high pitch in the western part of the State much less either politically or socially aff'ected this county The brethren of the order quietly abandoned their local organization and bided the passing away of the storm. The effect, however, of this ephemeral political move- ment was to make the Democratic party as a party more compact and consequently stronger and better prepared for its mission. This was illustrated no where more thoroughly than among the " once set not easily moved " farmers of Westchester County. But the business disasters of 1837 made much more of an impression upon them. The impulsive trifling of President Jackson with the finances of the coun- try, which at that time was supposed to throw a halo around his inflexible will and courage, brought upon his successor, through the troubles which in his ad- ministration the people were made to suffer, an ob- loquy and blame which Mr. Van Buren did not indi- vidually deserve. The fact that the Democratic majority in the coun- ty was reduced from over one thousand two hundred in 1836 to two hundred and seventy in 1840 shows, making all allowances for the humors of the " log- cabin and hard cider " campaign, that a deliberate, sober, first and second thought of the people was making Mr. Van Buren and his great party eat the bread of affliction. From this time for some years the two parties were more closely matched. In fact the lines of both were much disturbed. The ques- tions of the Tariff and Internal improvement were those which divided the professed politicians, but personal preferences and antipathies in certain divi- sions and localities were confounding plans and calcu- lations. The advent, too, of a secret political organi- zation, styled Native American, which had in the several towns a large following, was very unsettling as to the county and town nominations and elections. To be added to all this was the dissensions which sprang up as the question of the extension of slavery was discussed. As a consequence, the majority of Mr. Polk in the county over Mr. Clay was still less than that of his party four years before. The admission of Texas into the Union, which in- creased the Southern strength and the war with Mexico, which necessarily followed it, added new subjects for difference of opinion and debate. At the Gubernatorial election, in 1846, the defection in the Democjatic party, which ensured the defeat of Silas Wright, brought on confusion and revolt. The feel- ing was intensified when the death of Mr. Wright in the succeeding August was announced. During that summer, at the primary meetings and conventions of the Democracy, bitter struggles were taking place. In September the State convention met at Syracuse, and the Radicals, being deprived, as they alleged, of their proper representation assembled in October, at Herkimer. Mr. Hunter's name appears in the call. In this internal dissension the question involved was 488 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the extension of slavery into the territories. The Herkimer convention demanded tlial the principle of non-extension, called also the Wilmot Proviso, be in- troduced into the party platform. The Whigs in the canvass of 1847 were signally victorious, but the seat of Mr. James E. Beers in the Assembly was con- tested by Colonel J. R. Hayward, who had held it the previous year. Mr Hayward was unsuccessful. In 1848 the breach between the two factions was made still wider at the meeting of the two conventions styled the "Old Hunker" and the "Barnburner," in both of which Westchester Democrats were repre- sented. Among the names best remembered in the ranks of these two divisions are in the first, Dr. Benjamin Brandreth, .Tesse Lyon, Andrew Findlay, Warren Tompkins, Abraham Strong, and in the sec- ond Joseph H. Anderson, Colonel Hayward, Judge Schrugam, Honeywell Watson, Robt. H. Coles, Will- iam Fisher, Dr. Finch, and Samuel Ferris. Upon the nomination of General Lewis Cass for the I'rcsidency a complete division took place, and sepa- rate National and State tickets were selected. Mr. VanBuren was named as the Free Soil candidate fir the high position which he formerly held. In the election which followed the Whig candidate General Zachary Taylor, who was elected, received in this county a majority over the entire opposing vote. General Cass fell behind Mr. Van Buren six thousand votes in the State but largely exceeded him in Westchester County. Some of the most ardent leaders of the Democracy of earlier days had by this time become the stanchest friends of the policies advocated by the Whigs. The old Senator and Sheriff, John Townsend, is mentioned in this connection. The history of the next four years is of the weak- ening of the hold thus obtained by the Whigs. The death of General Taylor, the accession of Mr. Fill- more, whose views were materially different from Gen. Taylor's, and the exactions of the " Southern Oli- garchy," as Mr. Sumner used to style the Southern leaders of both sides, brought in serious dissensions among the friends of the party in power. The Com- promise measures of Mr. Clay, however, served both the great parties as a cement for the divisions in their ranks and within the old lines was carried on the Presidential contest of 1862. The county of West- chester gave Franklin Pierce, who was elected, twelve hundred clear majority. The number of votes cast had increased, it would seem, over sixteen hundred. Little is remembered of an exciting or important na- ture during this national administration, so far as this neighborhood is concerned, save the hardly-sup- pressed indignation (first) at the quite unnecessary strain which the abettors of the Fugitive Slave Law were putting upon the feeling of loyalty and obedi- ence among the people and (second) at the intervention for conscience or for effect, of the small body of Abolitionists, who really had no following in tliis county. But the Presidential election of 1856 developed the fact of great impatience, and of great unwillingness to be made uncomfortable, by extremists. Although the free soil vote, less than one-fourth in 1848, was, in 1856, more than one-third, it meant not for a moment interference with slavery in the Southern States. The sentiment of abhorrence for the institution never took form beyond its non-extension, and the rights of the States were as fully cherished, as devotion to the Union was afterward the absorbing principle. State sovereignty had free and open statement, and the charge of intermeddling, whenever alleged, was laughed down as an absurd insinuation. The course of Mr. Buchanan in his Lecompton policy, which was believed to be in direct contradic- tion to the principle of popular sovereignty, upon which he was elected, brought out the indignant op- position of a portion of his northern and western supporters, and their representatives in Congress, prominent among whom was Mr. John B. Haskin,the member from the Ninth District of New York, in which was Westchester County. In the Congressional election of 1858, in this District, the course of the ad- ministration was made the issue, and Mr. Gouverneur Kemble, having been nominated by the Democratic party, Mr. Haskin was placed by his friends in the political field. He was supported by the Republicans, and elected, by a small majority, over his opponent. To this election, and that in the sixth district of Pennsylvania, where Mr. Hickman, an associate of Mr. Haskin, was in like manner opposed by the whole strength of the administration, the eyes of the whole country were turned. Said a gentleman from Morrisania, "Should Mr. Haskin be defeated, and an administration candidate be elected, every post-office and every office of the Government would be illumin- ated." An incident in Congress, of a startling na- ture, in the early part of 1860, brings to notice the continued, determined and ardent part taken, after his re-election, by the representative of Westchester County in the fulfilment of his duties. While ad- dressing the House Mr. Haskin accidentally let fall from the breast pocket of his coat a loaded revolver. On the question of the propriety of carrying this wea- pon into the House, not only in Congress, but among his constituents and throughout the country, warmest discussions followed. The e.xplanation given was preparation for self-defense in the unprotected neigh- borhood in Washington, in which Mr. Haskin re- sided, in which much lawlessness prevailed. Many years have passed since this incident, but, taken in connection with the Rebellion which soon fol- lowed and the tragic and dastardly scenes in it, it il- lustrates the dangers in public life at the time and the unflinching determination of those calle;l to mingle in the discu.-isions introductory to the strife. We come now to the stirring canvass and clecti• X. Y. Col. MSS., vol. T. p. 339. ' X. Y. Census, 1855, Iiitrod. p. v. ^ Doc. Hist. X. Y., vol. i. p. (»:). X. Y. Col. MSS., vol. v. p. 702. « X. Y. Col. MSS., Till. v. p. 929. Doct. Hist. N. Y., vol. i. p. 694. ' N. Y. Col. MSS., vol. vi. p. !:«. Doc. Hist. N. Y., vol. I. p. 694. ! N Y. Ool. JISS., vol. vi. p. 392. N. Y. Census, 1885, lutrod. p. vi. >■ X. Y. Col. .M.SS., vol. vi. p. 5.'>0. ' Doc. Hist. X. Y., vol. i. p. 6Jt;. ) N. Y. Col. MSS., vol. viii. p. 457. X. Y. Doc. Hi»t., Vol. i. p. 097- 490 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. THE POl'l LATION OF WESTCHESTER COl'NTY EROM 1782 TO 1880. Year. Population. 1782 8,524 1786 20,554 1790 24,003 1800 27,373 1810 30,272 1814 26,367 1820 32,638 1825 33,l.'il 1830 36,456 1835 38,789 Year. Population. 1840 48,686 1845 47,394 1850 58,263 1855 80,678 1860 99,497 1865 101,197 1870 131,348 1875 103,5641 1880 108,9881 CHAPTER IX. THE CIVIL WAR, 1860-65.' BY FREDERICK WHITTAKER. Late second lieutenant and brevet captain Sixth New York Veteran Volunteer Cavalry. From Lincoln's Election to the Takingof Sumter— The Two Y'ears' Volun- unteers— The Three Years' Volunteers— Home Affairs to the Election of Governor Seymour — The Draft Kiots— From the Riots to the Close of the War — The .\id Societies— The Bounty Bonds— The Return of the Volunteers— The Roll of the Dead— The Drafted Men— The Grand Army Posts. From Lincoln's Election to the taking of Sumter. — From the day when the votes were counted, after the famous election of 1860, the question of Civil War was reduced to one of time. The party that then came into power affected to believe that it would not 1 If to these last two enumerations be added the population of West Farms, King's Bridge and Morrisania, which, in 1874, were annexed to the city of New York, the number of the inhabitants within the bounds of the old Westchester County was, in 187.5, 139.758, and, in 1860, l.Sd.OU. 2 The information contained in this chapter, as to the towns of Cort- landt and Yorktown, is from material gathered by the editor-in-chief. The records of Cortlandt were carefully kept by Mr. Coffin S. Brown, who Wiis supervisor at the time of the war, and took a pride in the matter. The items concerning the men enlisted come from the reports of the State .\djutant-General, in the form of the original muster-rolls of all the regiments that left the State. Of recruits that joined, after first muster, it was impossible to obtain a full and au- thentic list ; therefore I have not attempted a partial one. The informa- tion as to bounty bonds is obtained from the records. The particulars as to relief societies are credited as follows : Port Chester, Mr. John E. Mar- shall, treasurer, who kindly loaned me his book of accounts; Ossining, Mrs. Catharine E. Van Cortlandt, secretary and treasurer of the society, who sent nie the final report of its work, having bunted up the same with much trouble ; Cortlandt, Mr. Andrew R. Slartin, from Mr. Coffin S. Brown. I have further to acknowledge use of the files of the Eastern Statf Jountal, from Mr. Hendrickson, the present proprietor ; of the Yoiikers Gazette, in the year 1864, from the gentlemen in charge of the office. The sources of other information are mentioned in the body of the chapter. A history of the county during the war might easily be expanded into a volume of a hundred pages or more. — F. Whitt.\ker. [Much valuable and interesting matter relating to the late Civil War can be found also in the respective town histories published elswhere in this work. — Editob.J come ; but its adversaries steadily jjredicted its oc- currence, or confined themselves to the expression of a hope, against probability, that "the evil might be spared the nation." Westchester County, from its position, close to the metropolis of American com- merce, might be expected to take a commercial view of the question, and did so. The distribution of par- ties within its limits was similar to that in the city of New York, and the issue between the supporters of opposite views of the government was strongly marked. As in New York, the three factions into which the one party was divided, sunk their issue in a common electoral ticket, whose expressed bond of union was hatred to the " Black Republicans" and "Aboli- tionists" as a class. The leading papers of the county were the Eastern State Journal of White Plains, the Ifighland DemocratofPeekskiW, and the Yonkers Herald. All three were well established, marked by vigorous writing, well able to support their editors, and all exist to-day, under the same names, except the Herald, which was changed to the Gazette in May, 1864. The attitude of parties in the county is best exhib- ited by the way in which these papers treated the question on the eve of election and immediately thereafter. The headlines of the Eastern State Jour- nal, which we have taken as a fair specimen of the whole, and wherein the tickets were printed on the 2d of November — the Friday before election-day — read thus : " Union Electoral Ticket, Anti-Lincoln, Anti- Black Republican." No President is named. There are thirty-three electors, and W. Kelly is named for Governor. The editorial on the subject says, — " This is the day on which the fate of battle is suspended. Let every true man do his duty. ... Be at the polls early. . . . Vote before breakfast if possible. Permit no Black Republican enemy of his country to deprive you of a sacred right, or swerve you from yotir pur- pose. Challenge every illegal vote. Permit no imolent, paid and drilled Wide .\ wakes to dictate the law or your duty. . . . Stand firm and defiant— and get in every vote possible for tlie Union Ticket. Further on, and scattered through the paper, are statements that the ' Black Republicans are panic- struck;' adjurations to 'bring every man to the polls;' ' to vote against the Negro and Black Republican ticket, next Tuesday.' ' Cast your vote against Negro Suffrage. Be true,' etc. The result of these appeals comes out, two weeks after, in the official canvass of the vote : " Union Electoral '' ticket, eight thousand one hundred and twenty-six; "Republican" ticket, six thousand six hundred and seventy-one. The majority of one thousand four hundred and fifty-five cast against the latter ticket is not sustained in other cases, the ma- jority for Kelly for Governor being about a thousand^ while that for the Congressman is only six hundred and fifty. The neighboring counties of Putnam and Rockland show about the same state of parties. The editorial comment on the result of the election, THE CIVIL WAR, 1860-65. 491 after an admission that the country districts had car- ried the State for the Republicans by "about sixty thousand majority," is as follows: "The result is deeply to be regretted, not so much on party grounds, as for the continued peace and prosperity of the country. . . . The election of a sectional President— against which WASHINGTON warned his countrymen in his farewell address-has now been tried, and we are to witness the result. We hope for the best, yet we are not without se- rious apprehensions. . . . The Union Klectoral ticket gets about thir- teen hundred majority, but the State is black enough. New York City gives the Union Electoral Ticket 28,(iOO majority." From this time forth the tone of the paper is mor- bidly mournful ; but few comments are made till the assembling of Congress, when President Buchanan's message is praised as being " an able, statesmanlike and patriotic production," and the rest of the paper, u]) to the 4tli of March, 1861, is occupied with copies of letters from prominent Southerners, in advocacy of secession, includingthe " farewell" of Howell Cobb, in which he alludes to Mr. Buchanan as the " last Presi- dent of the United States." The points of Mr. Buchanan's message, briefly stated, were, — that the Union was in peril ; that there was no similarity be- tween the attitude of South Carolina in the nullifica- tion of 1832 and her secession of December 20, 18()0 ; because, in 1832 the sympathy of other States was against her; while, in 1860, that of the Gulf States was with her. That the trouble had arisen in con- sequence of the Northern States interfering with slavery — a thing they had " no more right to meddle with, in other States, than in Ru-sia " That the ques- tion had arisen, what was to be done? That he was of opinion that secession was " unconstitutional," but also of opinion, " after much serious reflection "' that the United States " had no power to coerce a seceding State," closing this part of the argument with the re- mark : " The fact is, the Union rests on public oi)inion, and can never be cemented by the blood of its citizens shed in civil war." A week after the secession of South Carolina the Eastern Stale Journal published a aermon, by Rev. H. S. Van Dyke, in Brooklyn, on "Abolitionism," in which the Bible defense of slavery was promulgated, and Abolitionists were denounced as " infidels." This srrmon occupied ten columns of the paper, in small type, and the editor drew attention to the leading point — the " identity of Abolitionism and infidelity." Extracts from Southern papers form the staple of news for the next few weeks, and on January 11th the editor announced, '' The mission of Black Republicanism is the destruction of the Union. The mission is rapidly being accomplished. South Carolina leads offin seceding. . . . Those who organized the Republican party are responsible for the present condition of affairs." January 18th, the statement was made that " Yancey, Toombs and Rhett are no more disunionists than Horace Greeley." In this morbid strain the opinion of the majority of the county appears to have run till February 1st, when a "State Convention of Democrats" was announced, to ^insist" that there shouUl be " no coercion, no civil war," with the assertion : " The border States mV/ not pertiiit Lincoln to coerce the Gulf States." [The italics are copied.] I regret extremely that, from this period to the 10th of May, there is a gap in the files of this paper ; so that it is not possible to say how the Westchester County Democrats officially took the news of the firing on Fort Sumter. It can only be judged from the coincidence of the tone of this and the other papers of the county with that of the New York papers of the same opinion. That it could not have changed materially is plain from the first heading that strikes the eye on May 10th, which is " Peace ! Peace! Down with the Black Republicans," though, among the news items, appears the drilling of a com- pany in White Plains, raised by Captain (afterwards Colonel) Janies J. Chambers, in which complimentary notice is given the men. The news of the attack on Fort Sumter, and espe- cially that of its surrender, as is well known, pro- duced a great change of public opinion in the city of New Y'ork, in favor of the administration of Mr. Lincoln, and of an ett'ort to put down the Rebellion. The bombardment of the fort began on Friday, April 12, 1861 ; the place was surrendered by Major Vnderson on Saturday, 13th, after an attack in which one man was wounded — none killed — on the side of the United States forces. The news was published in the papers of Sunday, the 14th, with the head-line, in the iVcff York Herald, " Dissolution of the Union," and the j)eople had all Sunday to think over the news, and the comments made thereon by the op- ponents of the administration. The exasperation of feeling produced l)y the news itself was intensified by the way in which these comments were made, and especially by the call made for a " peace meeting " in New York City. The Herald, in the same issue in which the surrender of the fort and the " dissolution of the Union " was announced, stated that a " prelim- inary meeting " had been held on Saturday evening, at which steps were taken to call a great mass-meet- ing, to " force " the administration to surrender, and desist fi-om Mr. Lincoln's expressed intention to " coerce the seceding States." Westchester County was represented at this preliminary meeting by some prominent officials, who held to the extreme Demo- cratic doctrine of " States rights." On Monday morning, April loth, a])peared Mr. Lincoln's proclamation. It called for seventy-five thousand militia, for three months, to suppress the Rebellion. That proclamation had the effect of a spark to a train of gunpowder in the city of New York, and the effect was felt in the county of West- chester in a proportionate degree. Men who had been waiting, sick at heart, in view of the quiet way in which the government was apparently submitting to destruction, realized that the end of submission had come at last, and that public opinion might be in- voked to repel the snicide of a nation. Then came 492 HISTOK^ OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the sudden outburst, in the city, of a popular anger, which filled the streets, in five minutes from the first rush into the open air, with a dense crowd of excited men, whose only purpose seemed to be to make every Democratic newspaper in New York " hang out the flag." They were roused at last. The Two Years' Volunteers. — When such a state of feeling showed itself in a city which had cast a heavy majority against Mr. Lincoln, it may well be supposed that in Albany, where his friends and partisans were in the ascendant in the Legisla- ture, it would rise still higher. Such was the case ; and the singular anomaly was presented, in the history of that stirring time, that the President's demand found itself far behind the popular judgment of the needs of the case. The call was for seventy-five thousand militia for three months' service. It arrived on the 15th of April. On the very next day the New York Legislature passed, with an unexampled celerity, and the Governor signed, a law providing — in addition to the quota as- signed to New York State under the call (thirteen thousand two hundred and eighty men) — for thirty thousand volunteers, to serve for two years. The law authorized the Governor, Lieutenant-Governor, comp- troller, attorney-general. State engineer iind sur- veyor, and State treasurer, or a majority of them,' to " accept the services, and to cause to be mustered into the service of the State," the volunteers named, " in addition to the present military organization of the State, and as a part of the militia thereof" It further provided for pay and allowances, the same as then prevailed in the United States service, to the force to be raised, and that the men should be " liable at all times to be turned over to the service of the United States, on the order of the Governor, as a part of the militia of the State, upon the requisition of the President of the United States." The first formal identification of Westchester County with the two years' volunteers, and the only one in the county in the shape of a body of men ac- credited thereto, came from the village of Port Ches- ter, in the shape of Company B, Seventeenth In- fantry, known as the '' Westchester Chasseurs." The interest that attaches to this company, as being the first to volunteer, in a body, for the credit of the town, makes its personalty worthy of special notice. The following is a copy of the muster-roll, with remarks on the military history of the company and its oflicers : Captain, N«lson B. Bartram ; First Lieutenant, John Vickers ; Second Lieutenant, Charles Hilbert ; First Sergeant, James Fox ; Sergeants, Tliomas Beal, Louis Neetliing and August Dittnian ; Corporals, William Crothere, John Beal, Joseph Beal and Robert Magee ; Drummers, Ste- phen Floots and William Fairbanks ; Privates, Aug. Adams, Charles H. Burns, John Burns, William Baker, Ardemus Barnes, Edward Bowen, George Buckley, Edward Bradley, Darius Butterfield, Frederick Cross, Amasa Conover, James Cunningham, Richard Conkling, John P. Denip- sey, Thomas Donohue, Silas Downes, James Dooley, John G. Dewire, Thomas C. Ely, Edgar Ferris, William Farrington, Charles Frear, John Fay, John Ferguson, John Gibson, Benjamin Glauson, Conrad Graff, George Gurtsey, W. S. Gregory, Charles Gedney, John Hart, Barney Hammil, Joseph Hibbert, William Hennessey, S. J. King, Daniel Key- ser, W. H. Lee, T. H. Lockwood, Seaman Jlorrell, Alexander McCloud, Theodore Miller, Christoplier Menken, George and Henry Marshall, John Murphy, John Murty, C. McGrath, T. McKay, M'illiam McKeel, John Martin, T. McQuade, W. O'Reilly, Jared Palmer, Henry Siltz, Robert Sergeant, T. Topping, Jlorris Thomas, James H. Taylor, James Worden, Anthony Warner, W. Whelpley, W. Woods, Max Weber and Louis Zulnaga. liemurke. — Captain Bartram was promoted to major November 2, 1861, and to lieutenant-colonel June 20, 18G2, being mustered out with the regiment June 2, 1863, from the expiration of the term of service, which was two yeai-s. Lieutenants Vickers and Hilbert were both promoted to be captains, and mustered out at the expiration of term. i Sergeant James Fox was promoted to second lieutenant, but resigned! in a few months ; Thomas Beal was promoted to a commission August 3,1 1862, and mustered out with the regiment as second lieutenant in thM following year. I Captain Bartram, at the time of his enlistment, waa vice-principal of one of the New York public schoolsJ earning a good salary ; and many people thought him one of the most foolish of men, to throw up a good place, merely for the purpose of " serving his coun- try," so low had then become the popular estimate of the value of patriotism. The effect of such publica- tions as we have briefly noticed in the case of the White Plains paper, echoed, in terms of the same or greater strength, by other papers of the county, had certainly not tended to encourage good feeling ; and it reflects on Bartram and the town of Port Chester a credit that no other town in the county can share, that he managed to get his company mustered into the service, in its entirety, as he did. He appears to have begun his work, almost the day the law was pro- mulgated — April 18th — in the form of a general order from the adjutant-general of the State, — and had his men ready to leave Port Chester before the end of the month. Even then, however, they might never have been mustered in as a company, had it not been for the energy and patriotism of a few men in Port Ches- ter, who took hold of the matter and held up his hands. This matter brings us to the history of a movement started at the same time, in which, also, the town of Port Chester set the rest of the county a good example. Before the Bartram company was fairly organized, it became plain that something was necessary to^sup- ply the families of the volunteers of the town, who were, in many instances, married men with children. Therefore, on the 30th of April, Mr. James H. Titus, a well-known citizen of the place, set the ball rolling by subscribing a hundred dollars towards a fund for this purpose, with twenty-nine dollars additional, to pay the fares of the men to the camp of the Seven- teenth Regiment in New York. He was closely fol- lowed. May 3d, by Mr. W. P. Abendroth, with a hun- dred dollars, and, by the 9th of May, the subscriptions amounted to four hundred and forty-four dollars. All this money, and much more afterwards, was raised by a " Union Defense Committee," of which Mr. Titus, an ardent Republican, was chairman, and Mr. John, E. Marshall, an equally uncompromising Democrat, > THE CIVIL WAR, 1860-65. 493 of the war stamp, was treasurer. This union of both l)artics, in the same cause, did much to soften the acerbities of political strife in Port Chester all through the war, and makes the personality of this Defense Committee — the first in the county — as in- teresting as that of the banner company of the coun- ty, for whose assistance it was originally organized. The names are as follows: Chairman, James H. Titus ; Secretary, George P. j Titus ; Treasurer, John E. Marshall. Military Committee : Messrs. S. K. Satterlee, Aug- ust AViggen, August Van Ammeringe, William L. Bush, George P. Titus and Augustus M. Halsted. Relief Committee : Messrs. William P. Abendroth, Noah Tompkins, John W. Lounsberry, George L. • Cornell, James H. Titus and E. Sones. Finance Com- mittee : Messrs. E. S. Swords, William B. Halsted and John E. Marshall. In all the money raised by this committee during the war, to which reference will afterwards be made, the only item which is not that of relief, in weekly payments, to the wives and parents of actual soldiers, is found in the sums first subscribed by Mr. Titu.s, and ajiplied to the purposes of the company itself The hundred dollars served to keep the men together, by enabling their board to be paid in the city till ac- cepted ; while their fare was provided for to the camp. It is probable that, if this sum had not been raised, the company would have disbanded, and been lost sight of, as were others. The town of Cortlaudt, al- most at the same time, sent out sixty men, raised by Mr. Benjamin R. Simpkins. For the want of the money that kept the Port Chester company together, this fine body of young men became lost in the great city of Xcsv York, and drifted into different regiments, 80 that not a man of the sixty was ever credited to the county, and not a few of them returned home. An- other party of sixteen went ofl'to AVhite Plains, under the command of Mr. William M. Bleakley, of Ver- planck's Point. On the roll of Company A, Twenty- seventh Regiment, they appear as credited to Elmira, of all places in the world. Mr. Blenkley afterwards became Captain Bleakley in the Twenty-seventh, and was discharged in February, 1862. The com- pany of Mr. Joseph J. Chambers is another instance of the same state of affairs ; for, though the men un- doubtedly hailed from White Plains, they are like- wise credited to Elmira, their captain being made lieutenant-colonel on the 21st of May. Yorktown also lost a great number of men in the same way, no mention of them being found in the official records of the two years' volunteers ; and of other towns there is still less trace, in any documents by which official proof can be furnished of the facts. The whole history of the two years' volunteers, in Westchester County, is one of men pressing their ser- vices on the government, which seemed not to want them ; and it cost more trouble, in the months of \April and May, 1S()1, to get into the army at all, than it afterwards did to get out of the draft. Captain Bartram, being a man of sense and experience, with a pride in his place of residence, managed to identify Port Chester, officially, with the movement, but no other town in the county could boast an equal rec- ord, either in volunteering or in patriotic efforts to help soldiers by private means. But the two years' volunteers were not long in being filled up ; and the serious nature of the war, with the equally serious way in which it was regarded by the Legislature of the State, appeared, almost before the last man was mus- tered into the United States service. The first order of the adjutant-general, April 18th, called for "sev- enteen regiments of infantry or rifles." A second order appeared, on the 25th of the same month, call- ing for twenty-one regiments more; so that the com- plete quota of two years' volunteers, in the State of New York, included all regiments, up to the Thirty- eighth. Within a week from the time the Port Ches- ter company was finally mustered into the United States service — May 22d — the Thirty-ninth Regiment was mustered in as an additional force, and the term of service of the men enlisted was three, instead of two years. From henceforth the history of the coun- ty, during the war, was to become one of quotas to be filled and calls to be met, while the ideas with which the two years' men had gone away, that the struggle would soon be over, had settled down into the sober conviction that the three years' term would be the earliest within which the battle would be ter- minated. The Three Years' Voluxteers.— The first regi- ment taken into the United States service from the State of New York for the term of three years was mustered in on the 28th of May, 1861. The first identification of Westchester County with the three years' volunteers comes on the rolls of the J^ourth New York Cavalry, which was mustered by companies, beginning August 10 and ending November 15, 1861. The muster-rolls of the regiment disclose the following names : The non-coiiimissioned stafT has (from Yoiikers) : Sergcimt-Major, lieinliard Kuehl ; Hospital Stewards, Max Leehler and Charles Reiss; Color Sergeant, T. R. Dodge ; Veterinary Surgeons, F. II. Walter and Rudolph Rodenhausen ; Quartermaster-Sergeant, John R. Suiter ; Com- missary-Sergeant, t'liailes E. Oormoer. [N. B. — The muster-roll of the above men in the State at^utant-gen- cral's olflce does not show the certificate of the United States mustering officer, nor is it dated ; but the men served, as far as can be ascertiiined]. The company rolls are more regular in form, and the following is their report as affecting Westchester County; Oimpiiiiy B (frum Yimiers). — Captain, Wm. R Parnell; First Lieuttnant, Christopher Dolan ; Non-Commi.ssioned Officers, C. R. Frampton, James Mcl'owell, T. II. Philipsen, Henry T. Clench, Duncan Murchison, Au- gust Ittmann, John Crean, Michael Cogan, William Ilillman, James P. Mist, Kniil liossart, Charles Dingier, Francis H. Tarleton, Charles Kirk, Martin Rabin, Merritt Livingston, Dennis Costollo, John McAdams. Private soldiers : Michael Barry, .\lbert Rurbank, William Bren, Peter Burns, Peter Brown, Thomas Brady, Owen Creally, John Cunningham, Patrick Coffey, William Crozier, Thomas Conroy, William Cas.«, Fred. Delinger, Hudolph Dcimar, Jacob Da Costa, Edward Durier, William Davis, John Freeman, Jlichael Fanning, John Geary, Matthew Guinan, Joseph tiarry, Michael Hirlig, Michael Hyland, Patrick Joyce, Charles JttCol>, John Johnson, John Kuntze, Jacob Kern, August Koch, Charles 494 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTEK COUNTY. Le Gard, W. Jleyer, \V. MaeJer, William McHale, George Montgomery, Peter Jliirray, Arthur Murphy, Doualcl McDouakl, Conrad Meyer, Thos. McCarthy, Patrick Maloiiey, Philip Meyer, Patrick O'Connor, William O'Connor, Uenry Peasba, Philip Plessing, Thomas Kouan, Patrick Boach, Jacob Roth, Julius Richter, Michael Smith, James Smith, John Smith, Owen Sweeny, Joseph Shorau, George Swau, Edwin Teal, Edward Turner, Jabez Weeks and Walter Wall. Coiiipatitj C{from I'oyilers).— Captain, Ralph H. Olmstead, the only commissioned ofBcer ; Nou-Commissioned OfiHcers, Charles H. Hawking, James Olmstead, James Magarity, Charles R. Smith, John Lowry, Ma- lachi Kelly, William H. Keeps, John Mulheren, Henry M. Hyer, George F. Kuhn, John H. Davis, Peter F. Gownas, Thomas Giff and Joseph A. Moore, Alfred Eyre, Lewis H. Denisou and William B. Miner. Privates as follows : William Barton, Daniel Buddy, James L. Cole- man, Reuben H. Chase, John Cole, Samuel Couroy, Alanson H. Corn- stock, Daniel J. Cronin, John R. Dodge, Gilbert B. Edwards, Monroe Estes, A\"illiam Forrest, George Giles, Michael Gornily, James Gray, Gil- bert Hummel, James Hitchcock, Jas. H. Howell, Jeremiah G. Huckey, Daniel Lewis, Peter Mallon, George H. Miner, Charles Miller, John Henry May, Michael McGinniss, Thoiiias Mullen, Arthur Murdoch, Andrew Overbaugh, Pliilander Payne, Dennis Ryan, Sam'l Smith, David Shaw, Henry Stone, John R. Suiter, Moses H. Terwilliger, Charles T. Terwilliger, Thomas P. Terwilliger, Richard ^'aughan, Eugenius Walker, John Welsch, Alva Wickham, Garry B. Wheeler, Nicholas Wolvau and Joseph T. Ward. Company F (frinn I'cnifar.'i).— Captain Samuel Genther the only name. Tlie names of Henry Jones, of Rye, and Jacob Roseubauni, of Tarry- town, in Company L, with that of James McAvoy, of Rye, in Company M, make up the total in the regiment credited to the county of West- chester. The next orgauizatiou in which the county ap- pears to have taken any official part is the Fifth In- dei)endent Battery, mustered into the United States service November 8, 1861, in New York City. The roll of this battery contains the names of Privates Charles Cadigan and John Turbitt, from Y^onkers ; Benjamin Moore and Charles Moore, from Mount Vernon ; and Charles Travers, from Peekskill. The First Regiment Mounted Rifles, which was mustered into the service in squadrons and com- panies, all the way from August 31, 1861, to Septem- ber 9, 1862, can be noticed here, although a little out of its order, to make room for the only regiment in which Westchester County could be said to be fully represented during the war. The rolls of the First Mounted Rifles contain, in Company F, the names of John Blatchley, Charles Polhemus and Peter See, of Tarrytown ; Thomas Gerhardt, James D. Nation, George D. Newman, James W. Porteous, Al- bert Sherwood and William Wallace, of Mount Pleasant ; and Frederick Gertman, of Harrison. This concludes the three years' volunteers raised in Westchester County as organizations, of which the records are accessible, in an official form, up to the raising of the regiment whose rolls are next in order. The Sixth Heavy Artillery was originally raised at 'ionkers for the One Hundred and Thirty-fifth New York Infantry, and mustered into the service from the 2d day of September, 1862, for three years. It then consisterl of eight companies, but, in December of the same year two more were added, and the whole was mustered in as the Sixth Heavy Artillery at Fort McHenry, Baltimore, Md. Gompany A contains the following names : From Peekskill; Privates, Gabriel S. Adams, Charles E. Orne, J. H. Wright, C. P. Crueger, W. N. Lent, D. R. Goethius, W. T. Travis, J. C. Halstead, John Smith, W. H. Dutcher, C. E. Snedicor, T. Garrison, D. A. Lent, W. M. Austin, Aug. Acker, Lewis Blakely, J. Bartlett, Val. Ben- inghoB, Daniel Couklin, John Cook, G. A. Cruger, T. A. Conklin, Har- vey Conklin, Patrick Curtis, Patrick Conly, Emmanuel Dadson, Willett Deuike, Howard Diveu, D. H. and M'. B. Dykmans, Martin Dallaway, John Dobson, Levi Ellis, W. Fitzgerald, Hiram Fisher, Abram J. Fields, H. M. Gillette, David Giles, James Griffin, W. A. Giraud, Isaac W. How- land, Stephen Hyatt, Jackson Head, Alonzo Hadden, W. Halstead, John Henry, Jr., Peter Haines, Joseph Hanlig, Michael Kelly, W. Kurte, Samuel E , Richard and Jerome Lent, J. H. Lantz, Abraham E., Thoma* and William E. Lounsbury, James and Henry Liudsey, Patrick and John Lynch, Ferdinand Lent, W. J. Malone, Joseph McClain, Aaron Mackey, James Moriarty, Jefferson McCoy, H. W. Owens, William A. and Obediah Robertson, A. H. Rooke, Alex. Soper, L. Shoulder, S. S. Starr, C. W. Smith, Bruce Scribner, Richard Tamer, John Turbusb, G. W. Tompkins, John Van Tassel, John Wessels, John W. Williams, Nathan Wright, David H. Williams, Samuel Williams, Fred. Young, Cornelius Zelyph, J. 0. Ryder, W. H. Townsend. From Yonkers, J. H. Boyce, J. B. Black, Frank Birdsall, Charles E. Bennenta, Walter R. Boyce and Willett Frost. Oniiptniy B contains the following : From Greenburgh : Privates, B. Armstrong, U. T. Archer, A. Sylvester, Joseph Archer, David Brown, J. W. Brown, Oscar Brown, W. H. Brown, J. H. Brewer, John Conlan, Theodore Coles, H. R. Gilbert, G. W. Lint, 0. D. King, W. H. Lush, Samuel H. Lynt, Orlando Melrose, M. McCul- lagh, James Mosher, William O'Brien, W. Storms, Thomas Secord, Sim- eon Lee, J. S. Secord, W. P. Tompkins, J. H. Van Tassel, Theodore Y'erks and William Lakin. From White Plains : Privates, M'. A. Ackerman, W. P. Andrew, AUen Ames, Fremer Brickies, Michael Butler, John Banta, D. P. Barnes, W. H. Baldwin, A. JI. Bogart, W. Benedict, J. H. Carpenter, Victor M. Collins, Michael Dempsey, H. R. Finch, H. Fowler, John Gedney, D. 0. Greenough, J. T. Hatfield, Con. HoUyer, S. H. Hopkins, W. H. Horlon, William Jephsuu, Devius Lloyd, Robert Moore, M. Morouey, M. Metzler, Felix McLeod, N. F. Norris, N. S. Northroji, Martin O'Rourke, I'atrick O'Donnell, S. C. Purdy, Eugene Purdy, Charles Pruck, Richard and Martin Rourk, Mervin Sniffen, N. P. Snitfen, J. G. Terrell, J. A. Tomp- kins, Alexander Yosburgh, Jerome Weeks, Morris Welsh and F. W. Hagner. (See also Co. I.) From Scarsdale : Privates, J. M. Boultou, Asa Carpenter, Patrick Conley, Andrew Champion, James Deboe, A. L. Dobbs, Elbert Fuller, Patrick Gorman, S. V. Lake, Lawrence Lowe, Robert Ogden, Jacob Steoffen, Eli Tifford, Charles Wrede, David A. Weed. From Harrison: Privates, Patrick Burns, Joseph W. Haviland. Compnuy C was raised at \\'est Farms, as follows: Captain, Benjamin B. Valentine, and First Lieutenant, James Smith, from that place, with Second Lieutenant, George C. Kibbe, from Y'onkers; Sergeants, James D. Turnbull, George Borland, James C. Cogswell and Andrew Mood, from West Farms; Corporals, William Rasperry, John Williamscm, Josejih Hue^ton, Eugene Maginnis, from same place. I'rivatcs, Samuel Archer, J. N. Buckridge, W. Blake, Thomas Conner, W. Corsa, William Carroll, J. F. and William Carson, T. Cromwell, Jas. Connaughton, Gilbert Cromwell, Chas. Day, W. R. Eaken, G. Edmeston, J. B. Eakeus, H. B. Ferguson, W. B. Frazier, Alex. Gowdy, Richard Graham, Bernard Glenson, James Grayson, Michael Graham, Job Har- greaves, John Hannon, F. Hitchcock, Abram Hinchcliffe, Jeremiah Hanson, Stephen A. Harris, John Julian, W. Kelley, Matthew Kerrigan, David Kinlock, John Lounsberry, James Lummel, Paul Lounsberry, James McGill, W. McCord, Aaron Miller, Andrew Mclntyre, Glaa McNair, John Moody, John Murphy, William Mitchell, W. H. Maxwell, Charles Messer, Michael Murray, Andrew Moore, Jlichael Moran, Chu8. Moran, Richard Mitchell, Patrick McCord, Thomas Nichols, James Ormeston, Samuel B. Pierce, Robert Parsons, W. K. Raymond, James B. Raymond, S. G. Ridgway, James Sloan, David H. Scofield, Jas. Sherry, H. W. St. John, James Schneider, C. H. Stanley, J. W. Taylor, W. Tot- man, James Thompson, John Valentine, George Wallen, W. Wright, Patrick Weldon, Robert Walsh, William Wesley, John Weeks, James T. Wilson, Henry Webb, JIatthew Kelley, all from West Farms. Company D shows the following list of names : From Bedford: Privates, D. I. Darby, Benjamin Ballard, W. G. Hal- left, David tisborn, Isiuic Adams, Elisha, Enoch and William A. Avery, W. F. Banks, L riah Biennis, Frederick Bullman, William H. and Wil- liam A. Clark, John Craft, John Crook, E. C. Devoe, James Elmore, H. F. Fiuch, Charles Fisher, N. Gaming, George Harrison, G. \V. Holley,\ Tim. Hinchy, Daniel Hoolam, Ed. Jackson, Alex. Johnson, John Kalt, David Kniffln, Oscar Lent, J. H. Lounsbeny, Lewis Matchett, Stephen THE CIVIL WAR, 1860-G5. 495 Matthews, William JIcGlynn, David, Frank, James and William J. Hiller, Divid Slosher, David JIuultoii, John Powers, John Kogars, Henry Schojtler, Daniel Springsteel, Charles Waterbury, W. A. Watcr- hury, George W. Zar. From North Salem : Samuel S. Austin, Andrew Quick, H. B. Slauson, James B. I'ayue, Halstead Baker, Charles H. Bates, M. F. Brundage, J. N. Oree, J. E. F. Ferguson, Jlortimer liiggins, David Knapp, Marsden Light, Stephen D. Metritt, Ezra Jliller, George Keynolds, Cornelius Smith, Alva Tompkins, John C Wood. From Poundridge': Alpheus Birdsall, Charles H. Brush and Alanson Dickson. Compmiij E contains the following names : From Port Chester : Sergeants, Cliarle.s Mackintosh, G. W. V. Bouton, Cephas Peck and James Ueynolils ; Corporals, Thomas M. Smith, John L. Little, Thomas Conlin, Frank Kelley and James Taylor, Jr. ; Slusi- cian, John Towusend ; Privates, William Ashby, Peter and Jeremiah Butterfield, J. A. and Edwanl Billington, G. S. Burger, W. E. Briggs, Thomas Colvin, Owen Dutly, Henry C. Fox, Thomas Golden, Luke Gaff- ney, Thomas T. Halpin, John Hughes, John Miller, Joseph H. Morrell, Michael Jladigan, Barney JIcDonald, William Reynolds, \\' alter and George E. Rood, John Riley, John St. John. From Harrison : Sergeant, Theodore M. Swift ; Corporal, Henry C. Weeks ; Privates, Thomas L. Ackerman, Philander Blauvelt, Joseph Brooks, Stephen Burger, Samuel B. Farringtou, Allen M. Foster, Jlat- thias Houff, Nehemiah Harris, Henry M. Hees, William Hicks, John Haiues, David King, T, W. Johnson, Harvey R. King, Henry Lowrey, W. H. Mosier, .\lphonso D. Peck, W. H. Romer, Jacob Scliiele, Stephen Waterbury, John JI. Weeks, George Wood, Robert Farrington. From New Rochelle : Corporal, John Flandreau ; Privates, Dennis Buckley, Martin Burns, R. W. Deveau, Joshua Fields, Fred. Hatfield, William Mercer, W. Pagan, W. Schwab, James Secor, Charles Thatcher. From Scansdale: Musician, George W. Downing; Private, Benjamin Odell. From Westchester : Privates, John Costlow, William Geary, W. W. HoUen, W. Leonard, Christopher JIulligan, Michael McCaw, Henry Keiuuiuller, Richard Sullivan. From North Castle : Elisha Ferris, G. W. Knapp, Jacob W. Lewis, D. R. Merritt, C. S. Palmer, Edward Tucker, Cornelius Van Scoy, Wil- liam Williams, William Glennon. From Yorktowu : Elias Fouutjiin. Company F contains the following names : From Yonkers: Sergeants, Thomas R. Price, Patrick Kelly, .\bel Waters ani Lemuel R. Knitlin ; Corporals, J. J. Brady, James T. Earle, J. E. Beaslcy, Benjamin Price, Judsoii .Vbbott and Edgar C. Nodine ; Privates, Nat. .\rcher, James Burke, William Brugg, James Boyue, Michael Bennet, F. E. Barnes, James Brown, Daniel Casey, Patrick Collins, Andrew Conlan, James Carroll, John Cogblan, Joseph Cain, John Darlington, Michael Donohue, John Foley, S. B. Forman, Patrick Gorman, J. D. Gilbert, Francis Goodwin, John Henry, Jacob D Haines, James Hart, Hugh Hurst, M'illiam Hamilton, Demetrius Hallett, Timo- thy Kelly, William Kailey, Thomas Kain, T. W. Lounsbury, William Lindsay, Solon Lapham, Thomas Lanny, J. T. Morris, J. T. JIi Mahon, Philip McGraw, .Micliael Norris, John (I'Donnell, Michael O'Rourke, William Pope, Thimias Ryan, .lames Pilson, Thomas Reiff, James Reid, Geo. Rein, T. A. Smith, J. E. Sherwood, R. Sherwood, William Thonip- «>n, Win. Vail, Geo. Voltz, Stephen Van Wart, Cornelius Vandervlandt, Bichaixl and James Welsh, William Watson, Aaron Whitlock. From Peekskill : Sergeant, George Hanlock ; Corporals, Thomas Tuttle and Jacob Giles ; Privates, Robert Brown, Dennis Bradley, Jacob Boyce, Andrew Corry, John Conover, W. D. Cannon, Jlichael Fagan, William H. and Gilbert Gilleo, T. J. Head, Robert Hamilton, William Harl, Aolick .loyce, Barney Key, .\braham Lent, John Laforge, James Laf- ferty, T. McLaughlan, Stephen McGoveru, Jeremiah Miller, Bariiett HcCann, James JIaguire, George W. Mott, .lesse B. Miller, J. W. Powell, W. H. M. F. Seward, W. S. Shriiupton, Fred. Stockholm, Elijah Travis. Compunij H contains th>^ following names, all from the villageof Jlor- tiaania, then a part of the county : Captain, Henry B. Hall ; First Lieutenant, David Hazel ; Second Lieu, tenant, Gonverneur Morris, Jr. Sergeants, James E. Jacobs, John E. Myers, George Denerlein ; Pri- Tates, Christian .\iichler, Jos. H. Brown, John Banr, Peter Bergenger, Joaeph Behrens, E. H. Blauvelt, Jacob Bock. J. J. Callahan, W. Camp- bell, W. B. Conlon, George Cramer, John Cam|ibell, Frank Dick«, Jo- •eph Dawson, Phil. Deahl, T M. Dean, Henry Donohoe. Philip Fox, John J. Folks, Richard Freischbier, Wm. Green, Mortimeraiul William Gress- beck, Andrew Gourty, James Gilhooly, John Graff, Michael Golden, enry Herbet, Fred. Herroii, Biirkhard and Joseph Haas. J. A. Hoyt, Morgan Hogan, R. 11. Herrington, Morris Hoag, George Hutton, Fred. Kolbe, C. R. Kellner, I'eter Koos, Jacob Kraus, George Kassel, Garrett Keany, John Klotz, James Lyons, James Lawrence, E. S. Myers, Henry Miller, Pat. Meagher. John Malone, John Murphy, Thos. Mvirray, Gott- lieb Jlotzger, John Metzger, John McNally, Francis Myers, Paul Miller, George K. Mills, Pat. Nolan, Charles H. Nichols, JamesO'Brien, Charles H. Piatt, Wesley Philips, Daniel C. O'Neil, Henry Quackeubush, Timo- thy Redden, John Steiuer, Charles and Thomas M. Stevens, John A. and Charles Shintler, George Smith, Andrew Stackinger, Wm. Schwartz, Frank Steiner, .\. Sanguinetti, William Tanner, Joseph Tremmell, Edward Warner, William Walsh, Edward ^\'ilkinson, John S. Wallace, Anthony Webber, Fred. Wessel, George Van Winkle, Conrad Zaff, Wil- liam Gioslion. Compauy I contains the following names : Captain Clark Peck, First Lieutenant Charles C. Hyatt, and Second Lieutenant J. H. .Vshton, from Ossining ; with First Sergeant Leonard Cronk^ from the same place. From Ossiiiiiig, besides the above : Privates Benjamin Ackerly, George W. Briggs, H. Chapman, J. M. Clare, Stephen C. Chadeayne, Martin Cavanagh, Charles Dingue, James H. Doty, Thos. Donohue, Jos. Din- gue, Wm. Garrett, Alonzo Geroe, .\aron L. Griffin, Peter Ganong, Peter Hughes, Jonathan Knight, Wm. Knight, George W. Knapp, Daniel Luther, Abni. M. Miller, Thos. Taflee, J. L. Van Wort, James Wilson and James Young. From New Castle: .Vliel .'kdams, Abram Harrison, Harrison Adams, J. M. Birdsall, James Brundage, Wm. Briudley, George Daniels, George Eniier, Charles Fisher, Henry Feeks, L. H. Hntcliings, Edward Mel- rose, Eugene Marshall, .lames Magin, George, William and Warren Outhouse, W. E. Reynolds, Christian Baper, C. R. Reynolds, John Scully, Hiram Smalley, Ale.xander, William H. and James Yerks. From Yorktown : Michael Barnes, J. M. Craft, Anson Edwards, John S. Johnson, Clifton R. Nicliols, Joseph Rhodes, .Jesse K. Sarles, Jackson Y'oung. From Cortlandt : Privates, John Brackin, William Connor, Charles Hartman, Robert Hitchcock, Elvin Howes, Henry C. Purdy, Daniel Ryan. From North Castle ; Privates, W. H. Dayton, Lewis M. White. From Mount Pleasant : Privates, John W. Farrington, Ab'm B. Ham- mond, Henry E. Higgins, Benjamin F. Melrose, James 0. Yerks and Theo. Y'oung. From Bedford; Privates, James Peeks, David Miller, Charles A. Miller Alfred C. Miller, William Taylor, Hiram, James E. and Jonas .\. Wor- den. Company K contains the following names : I'irst Lieutenant, Frederic Shonnard, from Y'onkers. From Harrison : Private, Peter Busket. From White Plains : Privates, Martin Bennett, Patrick Connolly, Henry Earle, Jos. Flanigan, Adam Fowler, F. W. Hagner (see Co. B) R'>')ert E Higgins, William Lyons, Henry Luens, Thomas Mo ire, .lohn Moulte, John Qjiil m, F. C. Pcirly, .Tolin M C illough. From Scarsdale : Privates, Asa Carpenter, Elbert Fuller, Othniel Mer- ritt. From West Farms : Privates, ,Iohu Clauile, Edward Cromwell, Peter Dodge, Simon Kurkabittich, John F. Mullin, Martin Moran, John Schappler. .lohii Roan, Orlaiulo Vreeland, William Phelps, Charles and Frederick Sagenian, Joseph Davis, George Philips. From Greenbiirgh : Privates, Edward F'ulun, .John Golden, George Lloyd, Michael McCulloch, Joseph O'.Malley, Francis Talaor, W. B. Adams. Compiiiii/ L was chiefly recruited in Putnam County, but it has the following names from Westchester County ; From Yorktown : Sergeant, William Emmerson ; Corporal, John Ham- ilton ; Privates, Jordan Ackerman, James Barnes, John D. Crawford, Herman G. and Samuel M. Grey, Thomas Higgins, John Ritz, John W. Weeks. From Y'onkers : Privates, James JlcCann, John Soth. From Cortlandt : Private .Vbraliam Florence, and from Greenburgh, Privates .James Britlifle, William Denke. Oniipiiny .M is the last fr «m the county, and has the following names: Captain Joseph T. Tompkins, from ^lorrisania ; First Lieutenant, .Justus T. Crosby, from North Salem. From Jlonnt Pleasant : First Sergeant J. H. Goodell, and Privates Henry Brown, James H. Devlin, Patrick Galloon, Cina Giusippa, Thos. Mullen, Richanl Seeley, .Antonio Superno. From Y'onkers : Sergeants W. Elmemlorf and David C. Mnnson, with Privates Peter Brooks, Clias. Baker, Lewis Baur, .MonzoBird, W. Kline, Abram Cornell, Charles Cape, Thomas Connor, >Iicliael Delaney, Michael 496 HISTOKY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Dorr, John Gleason, Dennis Harrington, Francis Helnjinger, Thomas Hampson, George Hendrickson, Daniel Losee, H. R. Mason, W. Mc- Causeland, Jolm G. JIcLean, \Vm O'Xeil, Fred. Raisler, Sej'uiour H. Reynolds, ,Iohn Smith, Pati Victor, Oscar Weeks, Charles L. De Witt. From North Salem : Privates, Daniel Crane, James Dailey, George I'ul- ler, Lewis Higgins, Henry Hawley, From North Castle : Corporal, Frederick Kratz ; Privates, David Mar- shal, Hudson and George Reynolds. From Bedford: Sergeant, Edward T. Palmer ; Privates. John Banker, George \. Felt, Josh\ia Fowler, John A. Keeler, John A. Lockwood, Abram Philips, John Rich. From Poundridge : Corporals, Theodorick Barrclaiigh, Andrew Sco- fleld ; Privates, James Allstream, Theodore Birdsall, George Dixon, Charles Hamilton, Thos. E. Halford, Joseph M. Halford, Isaac W. Miller, John Piatt, Nathaniel W. Sylvester. From Lewisborough : Privates, William Bennett, Frank Gmba. From Ossining ; Privates Joseph E. Brown, Miles 0"See, Harvey G. Ross. From White I'lains : Private John Cooley. The last orgauization with which the county ap- pears to have been identified is theSixteenth (Sprague Light) Cavalry, which was mustered into the service from June to October, 1863. The companies of this regiment in wliich the county furnished men, officially accredited thereto, were K, L and M, in which the following names appear : Compauy K. — Privates Charles H. Ackerman, Philip Apel, Henry .\pel- baus, John Baker, John Baureis, Anthony Chichester, Robert Clark, Gustavns Dalilgren, Ernest Diezelski, Gustavus Francis, Lorenzo Hacket, Frederic Haller, John Hoffman, William Moore, Theodore Pickerj', Henry Raymond, James T. Scanlan, William Shields, Walter Smith, Henry R. Thompson, George Thompson, John Walsh and Henry Zollin- ger, all of Mount Pleasant, chiefly recruited by Captain Ronald Mc- Nichol. John Armstrong, Edwin D. Barlow, Franz Carl Digel, Thomas Dl, put at the head of its columns the following card, which it kept up till the November of the following year, as an ex- plicit statement of its position in the contest. It was as follows : "the trie sentiment. Mr. Lincoln is nnt the I'nUed Staleit govemnwnt. The government WOVHS and tt'fi Off allegiance In it. Mr. Lincoln is not ours, and we dt) not owe allegiance to hint. Mr. Lincoln^s term of office is brit'f and fieeting : the government, we hojw, will last forever. The leader, in the first paper in which this " true sentiment " is put forth, is an argument to prove that, when the war is over, the Fugitive Slave Law should at once be enforced. On the 21st of May, the editor, iu answer to a Republican paperj ust started — the MorrUa- nia Journal — explains the "true sentiment " at length ; accuses the Republicans of carrying on the war for party purposes, simply, and ends with the assertion : " the Republicans stand by their administration ; the Democrats by our government." From this time to the battle of Bull Run, the fight is carried on with the Morrisania Journal. The paper is full of sneers at " Abolitionists," and teems with assertions that " the volunteers in the field are in the proportion of three Democrats to one Republican," with the further as- sertion that " all Abolitionists are cowards." In July the paper drops politics on the first page, and begins to put in serial stories, paying much attention to local items, and ignoring the war as much as pos- sible. It is full of a Fourth of July local celebration; and the only indication of the old feeling crops out in a paragraph, "No abolitionism. The border Slave States might be conciliated, if a promise was given them that their slaves should be retained." The editor hopes that " Horace Greeley will be thrown overboard," and that " Democrats will be called to advise Mr. Lincoln." The news of Bull Run brings a marked approval of the " peace resolution," introduced by Mr. Benja- min Wood in Congress, and laid on the table bj' Mr. Washburn, of Illinois. The editor asks, " When will the war end?" and says that " another administration must come in before peace is likely to be restored to the country." In August the editor indignantly re- pudiates the assertion that " the anti-slavery feeling is spreading at the North," but admits the " apostasy " of several Congressman, who are voting with the ad- ministration to prosecute the war. It glories in the fact that Mr. Haight, the member from the home dis- trict, is still /)pposed to the prosecution of the war. It further glories in the fact that the Democratic State Convention has refused to join the Rei)ublicans in nominating a " Union State Ticket " of both par- ties, united only in prosecuting the war. 498 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTEE COUNTY. This refusal is justified by the radical difference on the subject of slavery. August 16th begins the bitter controversy on the suspension of the habeas corpus, when the sheriff of Kings County tried to get out of Fort Lafayette the Baltimore police commissioners, confined there under an order of General Banks, for treasonable action in Maryland. From this time it seems that the Republican papers, recently estab- lished in the county, are beginning to "strike back," for the editor is very indignant at being classed with the Yonhers Herald and Highland Democrat as " three penny-whistle, traitor sheets." He indignantly asks, " if all the men opposed to the Mexican War and that of 1812 were traitors ?" and answers : "No, we are not traitore. We admit that the secessionists forced the war on ns. . . . Bat we hate Abraham Lincoln's principles. . . , We have exposed corruption wherever we have found it. . . . If this be treason, make the most of it. . . . If hatred of the Chicago platform be treason, we are traitors. So are three-fourths of our soldier's, and they would refuse to march a step if they thought that their loyalty was to be measured by such a standard, . . ." Next week the White Plains paper, with the High- land Democrat and Yonkers Herald, were formally pre- sented by the grand jury in the following terms : THE PIIESENT.MENT. " The Grand Jury of the county of Westchester, recognizing the ex- istence of the war in which the country is now engaged, with an armed rebellion in a portion of the confedeiacy ; and the necessity for its vigo- rous prosecution, until an honorable peace is conquered ; and desirous of having public opinion so fixed, and individual action so shaped, in the hitherto loyal county of Westchester, in regard to the war, as to prevent breaches of the peace ; feel it a duty to call the attention of all loyal citizens and the magistracy of the county to the importance of every one within its borders contributing every honorable effort to the sustaining of the Federal arm, in maintaining the supremacy of the laws of the land and in crushing out the rebellion of the southern traitors. They therefore admonish all citizens of the fact that in a state of war, inter- national as well as local law declares the giving of aid and comfort to the enemies of a governmeut, either by overt acts, in assisting its enemies, or by WRITINGS or PUBLICATIONS, tendiug to give such aid and comfort, the crime of misirrisioii nf treason, to be punished, on conviction, by imprisonment. " The Grand Inquest of the county, having had brought to their at- tention sundry articles, which have appeared in newspapers, published within this county, denying the justice o f the n-ar in which w'e are engaged, treiiting it as a party war, and not involving in its issues the government itself and our national existence, and therein symjiathizing with the traitors to the Republic, deem it proper, in conservation of the peace of the county, that the proprietors and editors of these papers should be by them publicly admonished of the great moral, if not legal, crime, in which, from partizan motives, they have been indulging, to the danger of the peace and quiet of the people, And, lest injustice should be done to loyal newspapere, the following journals are particularly designated as disseminators of doctrines which, in the existing state of things, tend to give aid and comfort to the enemies of the government, and to prevent a vigorous prosecution of the war, by which alone the supremacy of the government is to be maintained, and national peace and prosperity wit- nessed in the land. "The Yonkers Herald, Highland Democrat and Eastern Sfaffi Jnnrnul have, from the time of the issue of the President's Proclamation, imme- diately after the firing on Fort Sumter, steadily treated the war which has followed, in the extracts and articles they have published, as an un- holy and partizan war, unjustly commenced and prosecuted by the adminis- tration. In so doing, it has evidently been their i)urpose to consolidate a party, by the aid of whose opposition and influence they might prevent enlistments and retard the successful prosecution of the war. [Two New York City papers are further mentioned as circulating in the county, with similar doctrines and the presentment proceeds ;] " The Grand Jurors, therefore, invoke the attention of the District At^ torney of this county to the prosecution of the editors and proprietors named, if hereafter, after this public notice of their evil courae, they shonld persist in thus continuing to give aid and comfort to the enemies of the government, and they request him to certify and transmit a copy of this presentment to the United States District Attorney of the South- ern District of New York, witii a view to his commencing such proceed- ings thereon as the nature of the circumstances requires. "Stephen Lyon, Foreman. " W. SwiNBUENE, Clerk." This document naturally produced quite an excite- ment in the office of the Eastern State Journal, and the editor, being a White Plains man, living within a stone's throw of the court-house, and personally known to all the members of the grand jury, exerted himself to the utmost to get rid of the stain it pro- duced on his reputation. He managed to get a letter from the foreman of the grand jury, which he pub- lished in his next week's paper, stating that he (the foreman) had voted against putting the Eastern State Journal on the list of papers presented, but that he had been outvoted and therefore had signed the pre- sentment. Mr. Lyon, in thus letting out the secrets of the grand jury room, did what he could to save a neighbor by further saying that he was " one of nine '* who voted to strike the Journal off the list. Next week the indefatigable editor managed to get two more men who were on the grand jury to say that theg voted against the presentment, and as soon as this consummation was reached he burst out into in- dignant denunciation of the men who voted/o?-it, as a " corrupt and debauched clique ; " " curs who have snarled and snapped at our heels for years," who need"' a sound kicking" for " besliming and befoul- ing all. they touch," while "their putrid breath so corrupts the air" that the editor can hardly draw his breath. The presentment, however, had a marked effect on the tone of the paper for some weeks, for the next edi- torial conclusion on '• what patriotism demands of party organization " in the crisis is that the Demo- crats should, in future, "stick together on local issues " and let the administration carry on the war without interference. Next week the editor speaks of the "determined and loyal course of the President." After that he explains his motto in a different spirit; prints Union letters and speeches, in one of which a War Democrat declares "compromise impracticable;" and so the paper swims quietly along until the State election, at which Democrats are exhorted to "Stick to your party," "Vote the Democratic State Ticket," "Stand by the old party," "Don't be humbugged by the cry of no-partyism," "It is an old dodge," etc., etc. The result of the election — for Secretary of State and other officers, in the off year — giving the Republicans a ma- jority of all they wished, with the first appearance of Judge Robertson in the capacity of State Senator, the editor finds comfort in the removal of Fremont — effected about the same time — which he assumes as a THE CIVIL WAK, 1860-65. 499 mark of "proper respect to the sentiments of the Democracy of the North." It would take us far beyond the limits of such a chapter as this to follow the course of political opin- ion at the county capital with any minuteness; but the tone of the Edsteni Slate Journal grows stronger and stronger in opposition to the prosecution of the war during the year 1862, though the obnoxious "true sentimeut" is dropped. There are no more articles openly abusing " Abolitionists:" but the paper sticks to the doctrine, as late as April 20, 18(52, that "the general government has, even in war, no more power" to coerce a rebellious State "tlian the Consti- tution gives it," and therefore none to confiscate slaves or set them free- The abuse of "Abolitionists" is changed, as the summer goes on, to philippics on "lazy, mindless negroes," and predictions of a "San Domingo massacre " if the slaves of the South are ever freed. As tlie autumn comes on, however, the nomination of Horatio Seymour puts the editor on his feet again, and he begins to threaten the " Aboli- tionists " more boldly every day. In December he closes the year 1862 by referring to the coincidence of the Emancipation Proclamation of Mr. Lincoln and the election of Jlr. Seymour to be Governor of New York as "The Two Proclamations." The one he concludes to be mere "waste paper, impossible of en- forcement," while the other is "A proclamation that the State of New York is free once more." The lines "The Democracy Triumphant," "The Administration is not the Government," came out in every issue, and it is a noticeable fact that in this paper, as in the Yonkers Herabl- Gazette, as the virulence of the tone increases, so does the pressure of the county advertis- ing increase also, showing what powerful influences were behind the papers, in the shape of tlie county officers. The extracts from the Eastern State Journal have been given in full, because, as appeal's above, a part of the grand jury thought it not quite disloyal enough to be included in the presentment, and therefore its tone can be taken as that of the more moderate Dem- ocrats who stayed at home during the war and voted for Horatio Seymour, as they did. The figures of the election in the county are rather against the assertion of the Journal that "three-fourths of the volunteers from the county were Democrats," for the vote cast for Seymour for Governor is seven thousand eight hundred and sixty-six, a decrease from the Presiden- tial vote — given at the beginning of this section — of only two hundred and sixty votes, while the Repub- lican vote is onlv five thousand five hundred and <. fifty -six, which is a decrease of one thousand one hundred and fifteen votes from that cast for the Lin- coln electors two years before. The Draft Riots. — The most conspicuous inci- dent in the home history of the county during the Civil War, after the election of Mr. Seymour, was the occurrence of the draft riots, which, beginning in the city of New York, partly spread into the county it- self. The troubles in the city began on Monday, July 13, 1863. The New York papers of that day re- cord that the draft was begun on the previous Satur- day, in the Twenty-second Waid, at No. ()77 Third Avenue, and that " all was quiet, with plenty of good- natured joking at the names of the citizens as they were drawn." They also announce that the next place to be opened would be at the corner of Broad- way and Forty-fifth Street, on Monday morning. Tims it will be seen that, as in the case of the Fort Sumter excitement, a serious action had taken place on Saturday and that the people had all Sunday to think over it. In the first case the result of the thought had been in the direction of patriotism ; this time it was to be different, owing to the difference in the character of the individuals composing the two crowds. That of IStil was raised down-town among men who were, for the most part, well educated and self-supporting, actuated by a sentiment in which nothing personal was contained. No matter what its object or action, the crowd which, in April, 1861, compelled the hanging out of the flag, was "a mob " to all intents and purposes. Its action, however, was marked by no single instance of violence, and it re- quired no act from the persons at whom its anger was leveled beyond the simple " hanging out of the I'nited States fl.Tg." The mob of July, 1863, was of a very different character, and it began its work in districts high up- town, then chiefly occupied by squatters' shanties, pigs and goats. The men composing it were animat- ed by no sentiment beyond escaping the draft in some manner, they knew not how. Their general ignorance made their action, from the first, one of unreasoning violence, quickly degenerating into murder, arson and rapine of all sorts. Briefly catalogued, the first day's work was the burning of the jirovost marshal's offices, the destruc- tion of the lists (under the idea that if they were once destroyed the draft could not be enforced), tearing up railroad tracks, cutting of telegraph wires, mobbing of individual soldiers found on the streets, murder of some of them, resistance to the police accompanied by murder, burning of an orphan asylum for colored children, burning and sacking of many j)rivate houses, hanging of negroes wherever they were to be found by the mob, attack on the counting-room of the New York Tribune, rescue of the same by a charge of police under Captain Thome. Second day: murder of Colonel O'Brien, of the Eleventh Regiment, when he was away from his troops, general control of the city by the mob, troops telegraphed for, fierce fighting by the police to main- tain a semblance of ord^-r. On this day Westchester County became involved in the disturbances. Crowds visited the enrolling offices of Morrisania and West Farms, tore up the en- 500 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. rolling lists, destroyed the telegraph offices at Wil- liams' Bridge aud Melrose, ripped up some rails on the New Haven and Harlem roads, near the Bronx River, had pickets on both roads as far as Mount Vernon to signal when a general attempt to tear up tracks might be safe, but were quieted in Morri^ania and West Farms by appeals made by Supervisor Cauldwell and Mr. Pierre C. Talman. A telegraph operator on this day tried to put an instrument into a store at Hunt's Bridge, near Mount Vernon, but the proprietor was intimidated by a message from sympa- thizers with the mob, that, if the instrument was not removed, the store would be gutted. On this, the second day, there was a complete reign of terror, though no violence seems to have been committed in the county beyond the acts chronicled above. On Wednesday evening a meeting was called in the town hall, at Tremont, which was heavily attend- ed by the people of West Farms, Morrisania and the vicinity. This was presided over by Mr. John B. Haskin, and is fully reported in the New York Herald of Friday, till which time the notes of the reporter seem to have been crowded out in the pressure of other news. It may be remarked that the Herald reports of the incidents of the week seem the best to be found, the facts being given fully, without attempt to color them in either direction. The Herald report is here used, — " Mr. Haskin, in biking tlie cliair, said that : "They had met in a crisis wliich required the greatest coolness and judgment on the part of tlie people. He hoped that the proceedings would be characterized, hereaftei', as the c*>nduct of honest and law- abiding citizens. That it wiia not their interest to uphold the -Adminis- tration in the odious and unconstitutional Conscription .Act (cheers), but there was a way to test it, in the courts. In his opinion, the act of 17!l2, providing for calling out the militia, was fully equal to the present emergency in the history of the Rebelliou. That the men who made the Constitution passed that act, with the express object of giving power to raise the trooiis necessary in emergencies. When Jlr. Lincoln made his first call, it was good enough for the purpose. Then the State had a Republican Governor. Now it had a Democratic governor, and the old law was worthless. The chief executive of tlie State was to be deprived of his power, that his duties might be transferred to government satraps, toexecute the will of the irresponsible authoritiesat Washington (cheers). This was an insult to Sir. Seymour, and an insult to the loyal people who elected him (great cheei"s). If the Administration were afraid to trust the governor, afraid to trust the people of the State, it was a fresh proof of the imbecility of the men who now controlled the destiny of the Re- public (cheers). He argued that the State courts must declare the act constitutional or unconstitutional, aud by their decrees the (iovernment must abide. Therefore, why this excitement ? Their rights would be protected, their privileges maintHined, no matter at what hazard or what cost (cheers). He referred to the exemption clause ($300.00) as being an invidious distinction between the rich and poor (Yes, yes). It was undemocratic, unwise, aud he did not wonder that they objected to it. He preferred the old law, under which all classes bore equal responsi- bility (cheers). Our recent brilliant victories made it easy for volunteers to be raised, to put down the rebellion. Let the Government abandon the conscription act and throw itself on the patriotism of the people (great cheers). There were men enough to volunteer, good nten, of their own free will. Such men would tight better, and be an honor to the ser- vice. He went on in this strain, for some time, and then denounced the rioters for robbery, and declared the hanging of inoffensive negroes a dis- grace to the age in which we live. They ought rather to be protected, as the weak have a right to the protection of the strong. He was sure that this meeting did not approve of the burning of Orphan Asylums, be they for blacks or whites. There should be no distinction of nationalities, colors or races. Then the speaker denounced the excesses of Know- Nothingism bitterly, the audience applauding heartily. He alluded to General McClellan, who was cheered enthusiastically, and General Grant's name was also greeted with cheers, the news of Vicksburg being fresh at the time. " Mr. Pierre C. Talman followed in a similar strain, expressing his con- fidence that the meeting before him would be the last people in the world to violate the laws. He reminded them that the abolitionist fanatics, who were rapidly losing their grip on the people, desired nothing better than to regain it, through the excesses of a mob. (Groans for the Ab- olitionists). But the workingmen of Westchester County were always ready for peace and the law (cheers). He animadverted on the exemp- tion clause, as an odious distinction, and reminded them that the Gov- ernor (great cheers) wanted it tested in the State courts and declared un- constitutional (cheers). Then he denounced the excesses in New York, which, he said, were all committed by thieves, who had taken advantage of the excitement to disgrace the people. Mr. Talman was much ap- plauded. " During his speech, however, he was interrupted by a man, who asked if it was not true that Mr. Hasklu had a negro in his employment and what right he had to keep one V Haskins got up at once and replied that he had such a man, the same who hoisted the first Union flag on Roanoke Island, that it was no one's business whether he kept an Irish- man, German, Swede, Xegro, or anybody else in his employment ; that he intended to keep the man as long as he pleased. The statement was cheered and his questioner was silenced. This meeting adopted a set of resolutions, condemning the draft ; expressing confidence in Horatio Seymour, in his efforts to get it declared unconstitutional ; affirmed the judgment of the people of Morrisania and West Farms, that the act was unconstitutional, and deprecated mob violence. They appointed Messrs. Talman, G. W. Caldwell, Franklin W. Gilley, Thomas K. Sutton, John B. Haskin, John Kirby and Terence Kennedy, a committee, ' to wait on Moses G. Sheard, Esq., Federal Pro- vost Marshal of the district,' to ' insist that the draft be stopped, till the State court could decide whether it wascsnstitutional.' " The proceedings of this meeting have been given in full because it was the most important occurrence in the county during the draft riots. The speakers managed the mass of ignorant and excited men, whom it was their task to quiet, with singular skill. They flattered them artfully with assurances that their opposition to the draft was all right; appealed to their self-respect in the most ingenious way, and the appointment of the committee ended the whole matter. The county was quiet thereafter, the more so that the same day, the return of the troops from Pennsylvania and the report of fierce fighting in the city, in which the mob was getting the worst of it, had a tendency to kill the idea that attempts at violence were to be made with safety. In other parts of the county the disturbances went no further than aimless tumults, which resulted in no actual bloodshed as far as the facts can be ascertained. Mr. Thomas J. Byrne, the county enrolling officer at White Plains, was fired at on Monday evening as he was driving home, but returned the fire with a revol- ver and got away safe. His house was visited by a mob on Wednesday evening, after dark ; the enroll- ment papers burned, the house sacked and his wife and two children forced to take refuge in the house of Mr. Edward Haight, for fear of violence. Mr. Byrne himself was away from home at the time or the con- sequences might have been more serious. — New York Herald, summary of Friday. On Wednesday the Hudson River train was stopped at Yonkers, the rails having been torn up between that place and the city, so that the Canadian mail had to be taken to New York on the boat. The citizens of Yonkers formed two THE CIVIL WAR, 1800-05. 501 companies of Home Guards to keep property and life safe, but there was no serious disturbance. The arsenal was guarded day and night. At Tarrytown a guard was also formed, and pro- cured a cannon to overawe the mob, so that all was peaceful along the Hudson River. On the same day — Wednesday — there was very nearly being a serious disturbance in the town of East Chester, at the village of Mount Vernon, which illustrates the character of the ignorant prejudice, that culminated in such ex- cesses as were committed in New York City. A mob of men, from the quarries at the village of Tuckahoe, actually set out from that place, gathering recruits from the villages near them, armed with sticks, stones and any rude weapon they could lay their hands on, and took up their march for the vil- lage of Mount Vernon, with the avowed object of " burning down the houses of all the Kepublicans in the place." These ignorant men were probably ex- cited by the accounts given in the city papers, of the way in which the same vengeance had been meted out to well-known Republicans in the city, one house having been actually burned down " because Horace Greeley once boarded there," as reported by Tribune, Herald and World. At all events, they started out, and the news reached Mount Vernon, where a Home Guard had been hastily formed of the citizens, who were much alarmed at the idea of being attacked, both from the city and the river. Volun- teers were called for to reconnoitre the enemy ; and a drummer-boy, home on sick furlough at the time, was found, who said he would go. A horse was furnished him, and he — boy-like — must needs put on his uni- form and ride off. He met, about two miles from the village, coming out of the lane from Bronxville, towards Mount Vernon, a confused crowd of men, who stopped him and asked "where he was going." He replied " To Bronxville ; " and asked in turn "Where are you going? " The reply was " We are going to raise hell." With that they began to throw atones at him and yell, so that he was glad to wheel the horse and gallop away. Probably the fact of his youth and apparent innocence saved him from serious harm,
Ts Gazette with the history of the war in Westchester County. There was quite a little excitement after the close of hostilities, when every one was hastening, like the editor of the G-izelte, to addjhiskick to the fallen Davis, as to a plot to blow up the Croton Dam. which was alleged to have been seriously considered in Canada under the orders of the notorious Jake Thomjaon. A man who claimed to be a government spy, and who passed by the aliases of James Watson Wallace and Sanford Conover, in his testimony in Wellington, swore to having had conversations with the aforesaid Jake in January, 1865, concerning this and other plots. Later in the year (July, 1S65), in the Toronto Globe, appeared a letter from this sjime Wallace or Conover, in which he, on 20th March of that year, makes to Thompson the proposition to have the dam destroyed, on the ground that " one of my aunts, a Virginia lady, an enemy of every- thing Yankee, owns the land on which the dam is built, and her resi- dence and out-buildings are only a few rods from the abutments of the work. This will afloid you some idea of the facilities we have at ' command to accomplish our objei t. The necessary men for the business are engaged." This letter api>ears to be genuine and shows on its face that it was a mere decoy to get Thompson to answer explicity that he upprured such a scheme. Instead of this, the man who took him the letter swears tliat he said : " Is the man mad ? Is he a fool ?" and tabooed the whole proposition. 504 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. The scheme, as hatched by the United States detective, was an in- geniuus one, to make Thompson tliiuk the project of blowing up the L'roton Dam a fensible one, but, as a serious measure, it never had any existence, outside of the brain of the detective. The Aid Societies. — We have noticed, under the head of the "Two Years' Volunteers," the patriotic manner in which all parties joined, in Port Chester, in the effort to avert suffering from the families of the first company that went from the county. Other towns were by no means idle in the g;ood work ; but it is much to be regretted that the records of these societies have, for the most part, perished, and that particulars of names and of the work done are not accessible. The local papers from which they might be gleaned have for the most part perished, the editors keeping no regular files ; and the -references to Westchester County in the cily papers are few and far between. From the New York Herald of August 17, 1861, we learn, by an item, that the town of Bedford held a fair on the 16th, under the auspices of the ladies of Kato- nah, in which Judge Robertson auctioned off the goods, and read a letter from Mrs. Lincoln, stating that she had presented the " Havelocks " sent from Katonah to the Second, Ninth, Twenty-seventh and Tammany Regiments, and that they had been received " thankfully and with cheers." The town of Cortlandt, thanks to the care of Mr. Coffin S. Brown, who was supervisor at the time, has preserved the names of the members of the first soci- ety raised in that town, April 27, 1861. The officers of this, which was denominated the "Soldiers' Relief Association," were : President, Mrs. Daniel Jones ; Secretary, Miss Amelia B. Mills ; Treasurer, Miss Sarah Taylor. The committee to raise funds was ; — Mrs. John B. Mills, Mrs. Conrad Quin, Mrs. Edward Mills, Mrs. Joseph Mason, Misses Amanda Wright and Augusta Taylor. This association held weekly meet- ings throughout the war, sent out large supplies of lint, bandages, clothing and supplies for the Sanitary and Christian Commissions, and otherwise did noble work, being one of those bands of noble women in the Northern States who, together, managed to raise the sum of seventeen millions of dollars, by strictly vol- untary contributions, for those great charitable so- cieties. No record is accessible of the work done by this Cortlandt committee ; but in this, as in all else, Port Chester sets a good example, by the careful way in which her papers were preserved by Mr. Marshall, the treasurer. These records, already referred to, under the topic of the two years' volunteers, show that the first fervor of patriotism required much stimulation to keep it at a comfortable point. The first week's work in Port Chester left the treasurer with a balance of over two hundred dollars to distribute ; but the next, in spite of new contributions, the fund sunk to eighty dollars, and the Tituses, father and son, seem to have had to stir themselves to get subscriptions. By the 4th of June the balance rose to a hundred and eighty dollars; on the 8th, Mr. S. K. Satterlee ap- pears to have taken up the business of collecting, for he brought in two hundred and six dollars in a lump, all of which was paid out the same day, for the families of soldiers, or to the military commit- tee for expenses of recruiting. The balance sunk, by the 7th of July, to seventeen dollars and ninety cents, the payments made being in small sums to wives or parents of soldiers, on a weekly allowance, scaled according to the number of mouths to feed. The low state of the fund seems to have started the committee to work again raising subscriptions, for, on the 8th, the balance rose to two hundred dollars, brought in by members of the committee. During the rest of the month the debit side of the treasurer's cash account is empty, while the drafts for families are unceasing till the 20th of July, from which time to the 23d there was a stream of subscriptions, attest- ing the way in which the news of the disaster at Bull Run (July 21st) had waked up Port Chester. The end of the month left the balance, in spite of the same drafts as usual, $333.63, which was increased, on the 11th of August, by fifty dollars from George Cornell and five dollars from William P. Abendroth. John Palmer is credited, August 20th, with fifty dollars ; September 12th, John A. Merritt gave a hundred doj- lars ; but these are the only items worthy of particu- lar notice, and the aspect of the account was by no means encouraging — the givers being few, while the wives of soldiers, on the other side of the page, in- creased in number, as the weeks went on and the war progressed. By the 25th of September the balance sunk to sixty-six dollars. All the efforts of the com- mittee to increase the subscriptions seem to have been useless, for the debit side of" cash " continued to grow smaller and smaller, till, by the 5th of October, 1861, it sunk to its lowest point during the war, seven dol- lars and eighty -nine cents. This state of things excited the committee to redoubled exertions, and they raised one hundred and fifty dollars next day ; but by the end of the month, in spite of this and two hundred more, the balance on hand was only twenty dollars and forty-nine cents. The committee was reaching the limits when such work was a proper measure for the relief of the fami- lies of volunteers. By the end of the year the fact is revealed that the members had raised, by voluntary subscription, in the village of Port Chester, the sum of $3289.25, and had expended, for relief, $3215.57, almost of all which was given in sums of from three to six or seven dollars per week. During the early months of 1862 the amounts contributed for the re- lief increased notably, and especially do the names of the donors increase in number, every member of the conunittee seeming to have been hard at work, while other people were inspired by them to " go and do likewise," so that the balance never fell below a hun- dred dollars, and was generally nearer two hundred. THE CIVIL WAR, 1860-65. 505 in spite of increasing appeals for help. At the close of the " voluntary period," as it may be called, when the system of helping the families of volunteers gave way to the juster and more practical method of relief by town and county bonds, the record shows that there had been raised, in Port Chester, $4403.75, of which the balance remaining on hand, when the first bonds were received, wa-s $218.53 — a result that shows, even at the present day, when the paper is yellow with age, the ink faded and brown, that the hearts of the people of Port Chester, in the persons of their relief committee, were in the right place during the war. But the time had come when this system of relief was to give way to another. On the 1st of September, 1862, came the first town bonds, into the hands of the committee, and with them, alas! the first token of that " bounty system," which was to do more to de- grade the name of the American soldier than any- thing that occurred in the whole course of the war. The account of this change brings us naturally to the facts on record, in regard to the cost of the war to the county, made necessary by the unconcealed aver- sion of a part of the people to engage in a struggle from which the romance had departed, and where nothing remained but the grim reality of death, to be faced as best the heart might be found therefor. The work of the Union Defense Committees, there- fore, gave way to that of the " Ladies' Aid Societies " and the "Councils" of the Sanitary and Christian Commissions, whose sphere of action was diH'erent. I am glad here to give a specimen of what that sphere was, by the final report of the Sing Sing Council, which has come into my hands since the above was written. This rejwrt is dated 27tli of July, 18Go, after the re- turn of most of the volunteers, and we extract as fol- lows: "This Association commenced its labors the 27th ot April, 1881, just fotir years mid three months ago. Since that period they have received n766.8g from donations, festivals, church collections, lectures, Ac, and the Sanitary Commission Sociables. These sociable^s sent in S129 by their ti«B8nrer, Miss Hiibbell. They have expended $.1378.09, leaving a sur- plus of S588.7'J. It must be remembered that nearly an equal amount bus been given in garments, materials and hospital stores, and during tbe past year, also, the Christian Conmiission has had in active operation ■ Society in this village, sending constiintly to the front supplies of clothing and hospital stores. Taking all this into consideration, Sing Sing hw great reason for congratulation that the cry for help fell uot on un- heeding eai-8, and that her chiMren have uot been weary of well doing. The number of garments sent away exceed 0000. Several pieces of mus- lin were sent away by the Woman's Central .Vssociation to be made up ; •od when after battles the calls were urgent, efficient help wa.s rendered by the ladies of New Castle, Pine's Bridge and Pleasantville. It would occnpy too much time and space to thank all who have aided in this noble work, but the nutnagers must express their grateful obligations to the clergy of the village for their co-operation and hearty good-will, and ■bo to the editors of the two papers who have constantly published all their reports and notices free of expense. They also desire heartily to thank Messrs. Tallcot and Burrhns for the use of the rooms for several years. Since the commencement of this society three active and useful managers— Mrs. NefT, Mrs. Weston and Mrs. Truesdell— have entered into their rest. Their associates gratefully recall their labors and pleas- ant comixtnionship. . . While unfeignedly grateful to their Heavenly ^l^ther that war has ended and peace dwells again in the land, it is with 47 saddened hearts that the managers recall the thought that they will never again meet as a Soldiers' Aid Society. . . The great motive for labor, which united them and caused so close a bond, has passed away. The many pleiisaiit and painful associations are things of the past. . . United in our common ('hristian work, wo can never in after days forget the bond of union that kept us together during the four years of the war. " (Signed by) Mrs. .Jesse Ryder, first directress ; Mre. Pentz, second di- rectress ; Mrs. J. M. Smith, thinl directress ; Mrs. J. Van Wyck, fourth directress ; and Mnies. Van Hoesen, .1. S. King, G. Brandreth, Dr. Pro- vost, Cunningham. Ilowsley, L. Miller, Campbell, Marsland, Woodruff, Biirnes, C. Suiitli, Benjamin and McCord, and Misses Sing, Ryder, Lud- lum and Snowden. " List of articles sent from Sing Sing Union Relief Association from the spring of 1801 to July 25, 180.5 :— 1080 flannel shirts, 501 flannel drawers, 581 cotton shirts, 57 double gowns, 53 Canton flannel bed- gowns, 982 pairs of socks, 58 pairs of mitts, 171 havelocks, 12 pairs Can- ton flannel drawers, 15 blankets, 92 quilf.s, 505 sheets, 84 surgical shirts, 472 towels, 1303 pocket-handkerchiefs, 200 pillow-cases, 01 bed-ticks, 371 pail's of slippers, 04 pairs cotton drawers, 330 needle-books, 1 23 eye-shades> 02 arm-slings, 218 ring-pads, 98 hop-pillows, 18 napkins, 17 pil- low-ticks, 90 pillows, 88 sets of bandages rolled, 800 bandages, 24 flannel bandages, 8 caps, 3 cravats, 43 old linen sliirts, 105 packages lint (large bags mostly), :i7 packages old muslin, 80 packages old linen, 2 pieces new muslin for bandages, 03 neck comfortei's, 3 coats, 2 pairs pantaloons, 1 jacket, 1 vest, packages half-worn garments, 12 bbls. dried apples, 2 bbls. pickles, 20 jars pickles, 1 bbl. wine, 4 bbls. hospital stores, 4 boxes ditto, 1 box claret, 1 box whiskey, boxes jelly, 4 demijohns wine, 1 demijohn brandy, 250 bottles wine, with fruits, preserves, farina, corn starch, arrow-root, spices, tea, coffee, cocoa, chocolate, sardines, tobacco, hay rum, oatmeal, crackers, bologna sausages, 1000 packages magazines, papers and books, and 200 books. " Mas. Catherine E. Van Cortlanpt, "Secretary and Treasurer." The Bounty Bonds. — The first burden which was officially taken on itself by the county of Westchester during the war came in the shape of bonds issued by the Board of Supervisors under the provisions of an act passed by the Legislature March 1, 1862, "to re- lieve the families of volunteers in the field." The amount issued was fifty thousand dollars, which was placed in bonds of varying amounts, bearing seven per cent, interest ; issued to the supervisors of the different towns for sale, the proceeds to be expend- ed in relief to the families, in much the same manner as that adopted by the Port Chester Volunteer Com- mittee. The amounts issued to the different towns varied from twenty-five hundred dollars, or less, to ten thousand, according to population. The last of these bonds was paid off in the year 1867. From this time the county took no further action, in regard to the war, till July 27, 1864, when, in con- sequence of the drafts, the increasing claims of the bounty jumpers and the difficulty the towns found in floating their bounty bonds, the burden was as- sumed by the county, as it had been in the relief of volunteers, in 1862. The sum of five hundred and sixty-five thousand dollars was raised in county bonds ; distributed to the supervisors of the towns, as in the case of the first set of relief bonds, the rate of interest being seven per cent. ; the principal payable in periods ranging from twelve to sixteen years. The first hundred of these bonds was cancelled at the end of the year 1876, and the last sixty-two in April, 1881. The amount raised all went to answer a single coil for troops ; and, when the next one came, the State was obliged to step in to help the towns, which 506 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. actually made money on the difference between the bounties they paid and the amount awarded them by the State. In a sketch necessarily so brief and fragmentary as this must be, on account of the small space given and the magnitude and number of the events to be treated, it would be superfluous to give a detailed ac- count of all the sums paid out in the county. The annals of a single town will serve as a specimen of the way in which the money was raised and expended, the table at the end of this section giving the total for the county. The town of Cortlandt — then one of the largest in the county — raised, in the year 1862, $20,000 for bounties, of which $16,795 was expended, and 324 men sent out — an excess of 13 over the town quota. In Octo- ber, 1803, the town raised $14,000 more, besides sums paid by substitutes, and sent out its quota of 116 men. In February, 1804, it raised $85,000 to send out 73 men. In March, 1864, $20,000 was used to send out 49 men, with $5000 more, paid by drafted men for substitutes. In July, 1864, the town received, from the county bonds already mentioned, $107,800 ; raised $15,375 in town bonds; assessed the drafted men in the sum of $10,595, with a further sum of $30,175, which the drafted men thcmselvts paid, making their own bargains, and thus managed to fill the town quota of 219 men. The total cost of this draft is estimated at $164,500, or thereabout. On the last call, made after the re-election of Mr. Lincoln, 100 men were furnished at a cost of .$60,000, but the town received from the State an amount sufficient to leave it a gainer of about $7000, that being the excess of the State money furnished for bounties. The history of all the towns, during the war, shows how, as the needs of the contest slowly but surely in- creased, what had been left, at first, to individual patriotism, was gradually shifted, first on the towns, then on the county, finally on the State.' 1 The following table, taken from the reports of the superTisurs of the county, niada to the State Bureau of Military Statintics, shows the total amount of money paid out by the towns and the county itself, during the war, for war imrposes. The towns of liedford, Cortlandt, FmsI Chester, Greenburgb, Harrison, Lewisborough, JIajnaroneck, Slorrisania, Blount Pleasant, New Cas- tle, New Rochellc, North Castle, North Salem, Ossining, Pelliani, Pound- ridge, Rye, Scarsdale, Somery, Westche»iter, Vonkei"s and Yorktown paid out : For town bounties, $2,459,697.79 ; for fees and expenses, $20,402.94; for interest on loans, $199,658.07 ; for principal of loans, $704,585. .iO ; for support of families of volunteers, $73,732.35; making total expended for war purposes, $3,524,137.05. The county laid for the same items the sum of $1,347,235.70. The towns of West Farms and White Plains made no report and are not, there- fore, included in the above summary. The towns and county together thus expended, for war purposes,the total sum of 84,871,37^.81, or very nearly live millions of dollars. Of this sum, the county and towns received from the State Paymaster General in cash, $172 4o0.0U ; in State bonds, $458,600.00; and for interest on State bonds. $4802.49 ; a total of $035,912.49 ; thus leaving the actual expense to the towns and county, $4,235,400.32. The reports on which the above table is founded were made as fellows; Bedford, January, 1808 ; Cortlandt, December, 1800 ; East Chester, October, 1800 ; Greenburgb, February, 18G6 ; liarrisou, December, 1805 ; The facts shown by the enormous expenditure, in contrast with the number of men actually sent to the front, are also very instructive as to the way in which the political disturbances that marked the county and a part of the Northern States during the war increased the cost and made the victory more difficult of achievement. The price of substitutes steadily rose as the election of 1864 approached, while the last draft, after the contest was settled, was effected with- out difficulty and left some of the towns actual gainers by the affair. It is further worthy of remark, though this is outside of a local history, that the substitutes, obtained at a cost of from five to six hundred dollars a man, seldom went to the front at all, but remained at home, breed- ing that odious class of men denominated "bounty- jumpers," who drifted from regiment to regiment, and from broker to broker, till the figures of men enlisted into the United States service, on paper, must prob- ably be diminished by at least one-third, if not one- half, to allow for the number of re-enlistments and desertions. This part of the history of the county is one in which few of its citizens can take much pride, and, to explain it, we must go to such records as exist of the state of political feeling in the county, as shown by the columns of its political organs, already refer- red to. A summary of the figures in the town of Cortlandt shows that it cost, to send out each man who was enlist- ed, as follows: In 1861, nothing ; in 1862, $51.82 per man ; in 1863, $120.70 per man, from the town, with a probable hundred more from each drafted man for asub- stitute ; in 1864, an average of $519.60 per man, be- fore election ; and nothing for the last draft, in which the cost fell on the State, and the towns were gainers to the extent of about $70 per man enlisted. The Return of the Volunteer.s. — From the moment that General Lee surrendered his army, at Appomattox Court-House, the thoughts of the volun- teers in the field were turned, with a unanimity sel- dom seen in the history of war, towards the homes they had left so readily at the beginning of the con- test, at the call of their country. The impatience became so great, after the final col- lapse of the Rebellion, when Johnston and Kirby Smith had surrendered, that the men in the field could hardly be kept by the colors, for the necessary purposes of police; breaking out into open mutiny in some instances, Avhen it was proposed to put them into the regular army; indignantly spurning the idea that they were professional soldiers at all ; demand- Lewisborough, January, 1868 ; Mamaroneck, December, I860 ; Mor- risania, December, 1800; Mount Pleasant, Febi'uary, 1868 ; Newcastle, July, 1865 ; New Rochelle, March, 1800 ; North Castle, March, 1806 ; North Salem, January. 1808; Ossining, December, 1805 ; Pelham, June, 1808 ; Poundridge, October, 1800 ; Rye, December, 1805 ; Scarsdale, June, 1806 ; Somers, October, 1806 ; W'estchester, November, 1866 ; Youken, March, 1807 ; Y'orktown, December, 1865 ; AVeslchesler County, Decoiii\ ber, 1805. ' THE CIVIL WAR, 1860-65. 507 ing, now that tlieir work had been done, that they should be discharged and sent home as soon as pos sible. The diflerent regiments and organizations from Westchester County wore in the same category with the rest, and their liistory, to the time they returned home, is revealed by the official records of the State. Company B, of the Skventeenth IIegiment, the banner company of the county, from Port Chester, served its term of two years, and was mustered out on the 3d of June, 1863; the recruits, enlisted for three years, after the company was in the field, being trans- ferred to the Twellth Regiment New York Volun- teers. This regiment, being also a two years' organ- ization, had already been mustered out; but the recruits for three years, with a part of the Twelfth New York iNIilitia, with which it had been consoli- dated February 3, 18(j2, were formed into a bat- talion, which, in its turn, was mustered into the Fifth New York Veteran Volunteers on the 2d of June, 1864. The whole force remained in the service till finally mustered out August 21, 1865. The next organization in rank is that part of the Fourth Nkw York Cavalry recruited at Yonkcrs by Captain Parnell- On the expiration of the original term of service the regiment was mustered out, and the re-enlisted men, with the later recruits, consoli- dated with the Ninth New York Cavalry, February 27, 1865, under the name of Companies B, E and L, of that regiment ; with which it remained to the close of the war, being mustered out July 17, 1865. The Fifth Battery Light Artillery, remarka- ble as being the only place where the name of a Mount Vernon man appears as having been an original member, was retained in the service till July 6, 1865, when it was also mustered out. The First Regiment Mounted Rifles was con- solidated with the Third New York Cavalry July 21, 1865, the whole force being known as the Fourth Provisional New York Cavalry. This regiment remained in the service till finally mustered out, on the 29th of November, 1865. The Sixth Heavy Artillery-, being a three years' regiment, was mustered out June 25, 1865; but the re-enlisted veterans and the recruits whose terms were not yet out were formed into a battalion of four companies. The remaining members of the Tenth and Thirteenth Regiments of artillery, in the same condition, were added to the Sixth two days after; and the whole force remained in service till August 24, 1865, when they were finally mustered out. The Sixteenth (Sprague Light) Cavalry closes the history of the connection of the county with the war. This force was consolidated with the Thirteenth New York Cavalry June 23, 186'), the consolidated regiment being known as the Thin! Provisional New York Cavalry, under which name it was mustered out September 21, 1865. The Roll of the Dead.— I regret much that there is no reliable official record accessible of the names of men, bona fide residents of the different towns in the county, who enlisted therefrom and died in the service. In some towns the patriotism of the pcoj)le in charge secured such a record ; but even then the papers are, in too many cases, cast aside in a mass of rubbish, impossible of extrication. The following names are given from the town of Cortlandt, on the authority of Post Abraham Vos- hurgh, of Peekskill, No. 95, Department of New York, G. A. K. Ihi'rU Liijht Cavalry^ Compamj F. Sergeant Thomas McCiitcliiMi, killeil in action at Culpeper, Va., Oc- toliiT, 1S03 ; Piivate William Haines, killed in action at Brandy Station, on tlie same day, during tlie advance from llappahanuoi k Station; and Privates George Archer and Delancey Cole, died in liuspital and in Polio Isle Prison, respectively. [None of these names are in the _/ira( nuister- rolls of this reglmentj. Sitlh Heavy ArliUcnj. Colonel J. Howard Kitching, died of wounds received at Cedar Creek, October 19, 18G4. The G. A. R. J'ost, at Yonkers, is named, after him, " Kitching Post, No. G;i, Department of New York, G.A.R." Killed in action : Sergeant William II. Lent, Petersburg; Corporal Henry M. Gillett, Cedar Creek ; Privates P. Corne Cruger, David A. Lent, Cedar Creek; William Fitzgerald, James Sluriarty, Alexander Super, James Christian, (Jeorge liradley — all at Petersburg; Frederick YiMing, Abram A. Wooil, Washington A*an Scoy and .John Foley at .Spott- sy.vauia. May H), Died in hospital : Corporal Theodore Garrison ; Privates .lohn (.'ouklin, Frank Bieakley, John Henry Lent and .\brahani Lent ; Private John Terbnsh died at home from disease contracted in the army. Firet LieutJinant Richard Slontgomery Clilleo, died at home, on sick leave ; Private (^harles Conklin was killed at I'o River. Va., May 12, 186i. Hawkins'' Zouaves, Kiiith New Yorlc VoluiiUers. Color-Sergeant William Patterson, killed at Antietam with the colors, September 17, 18G2. Died in hospital: Privates William Van Houtvu, Rosier Garrison, John Rennet, G. W. Wilco.x, from wounds. Niiielei'iitli N'-io York Vvlunlefrs. Privates George Dyknmn, James Free and Jeffers .n Lent, died in the service. Twaiti/Sfventh New York Volunteers. Privates Thomas Hawkins, killed in action ; Jeremiah Murden, mur- dered in Elmini, in trying to arrest a deserter, June, 1861; (ho was the fii-st soldier said to be killed from the town of Cortlandt) ; Private Charlea Gardner died in hospital. Forty-fourth New York Volunteers {Ellstcorth Aiengcrs). Private Thonuis Wildey, Company A, killed at Hanover Court-House, Va. Forty-citjhth New York Volunteers, Captain Lewis Lent, killed in action. Fi/ty-Jirst New York Volunteers. Color-Sergeant George W. Fisher, killed with the colors at Petersburg, Va., Juiy 29, 1864 ; Private James D. Odell, killed at Roanoke Island. Fifty-ninth New York Volunteers. Privates Edgar Sutton and Pierce Miller, killed at Antietam; John Fitch and Benjamin Gandcer, died at Andersonville; George Fowler, died at .\nnapolis, after being paroled. Seventieth New York Volunteers. Joseph DaTenportandJamesCuinniings, died in hospital from wounds. Ninety-Jirat New York Volunteers. William Stocker, died in hospital. Ninely-llflh N'W York Volunteers. Lieutenant Edwin B, Lent, died at home from wounds. Miscflliiwous. C. .\. Turner, 38lh N. Y., wounded at Fredericksburg, died at liomo ; Calvin Lounslmry. prisoner from MOth N', V., nevercame iKick ; Sergeant D.ivid Ferris, 144th N. Y., killed at Fair Oaks; Henry Foruian, Company 508 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. C, 133d N. T., died at Baton Rouge, in service ; George Tice, JeEse Sey- mour, Isaac Brodie, IGStli N.Y. died in service ; Henry Halstead (colored), 30tli N. y., killed at Deep Bottom Va. ; John W. Kimpp (colored), Co. B, 29th Conn., died iu service. From the town of Yorktown there is a partial list, showing that of the Sixth Heavy Artillery, from that town, the following men fell : George Guinea, Harvey L. Searles, Lewis M. Searles. Obadiah Oakley and T. .1. Head, died in service ; Peter Ames, 12th N. Y., was killed at Fair Oaks • Cyrus H. Brown (regiment unknown) was killed at Peters- burg; George Poworsand Eugene M. Wright, 69th N. Y.; John Jones. 4th N. Y. Art. ; Joshua B. Young, 9.ith X. Y. ; William and ESias Searles .57th N. Y'. ; William Sheppard and William Sherwood, 87th N. Y., all died in service. This is the most reliable list, that I have been able to obtain, of men who actually died in the ser- vice, excluding those who are marked as having " died since the war." Were there any sort of local pride, in the different towns in the county, regarding the action of its citizens during the war, the list could doubtless be extended far beyond the present limits; but the readers of this chapter will see for themselves, iu the unfortunate differences that existed in the county, on account of the war, the reason why such records were poorly kept. Save by the families of those who actually went to the front, but little interest seems to have been taken by any one in the deeds of the Union armies, and the records were not kept, principally because the majority of the voters in the county did not elect officials who cared to per- petuate the services of the soldiers. Since the close of the war there has been a move- ment, in the establishment of Grand Army Posts at different places, to collect these records in something of a reliable form. The graves of Union volunteers are decorated annually, but these do not rejiresont, to any degree, men who went to the service from West- chester County, but rather those who have come to it since the war. Many of them are those of men who died after the close of the war, and so the records do not properly come in at this place. It only remains to give a short list of a few of the men who were drafted and furnished substitutes for this chapter to be finished. The Drafted Men. — The records of the draft in West Chester County, as far as regards the names of the men drafted, are generally missing, though the bonds necessary to save them from going to the front remained, to be finally extinguished, in 1881. In the town of East Chester, however, I have succeeded in securing a copy of the names of the men drafted, and the prices paid for substitutes, which makes very interesting reading at the present day. It embraces the calls for July, 1804, and the last call in December of the same year. Mr. Stephen Bogart was supervisor for the year, and his name appears among the list of the drafted men. The numbers drawn by the provost marshal appear to have been taken at random over the county, for they are not continuous. The first man caught in East Chester is No. 964, William M. Harward, while the highest number is 3241. There were two hundred and thir- teen men drawn in the town, altogether. Some took the commutation of three hundred dollars, allowed by the State, and furnished their own substitutes, in the best way they knew how. Others furnished the sub- stitutes at a definite cost; but the greater part let the town military committee do all the work, through the bounty brokers, who settled the whole business. Of the whole two hundred and thirteen, only two entered the service, taking the bounty money them- selves. Their names will be found in the list. The following men were paid the commutation of three hundred dollars, under the Conscription Act, and made their own bargains with substitutes, at their own risk : William Holdredge, James Cordial, William Searing, Charles Kane, John L. Brown, Ferdinand Holm, Michel Donohue, Jacob Grubb, Jacob Ruinliiudt, Chri.-Iulloy, Jacob Hyser, George Horst, Thomas Dooling, Thomas Donaldson, Francis Schleicher, Philip Flood, William Ilickey, William B. Jones, \\'illiam Deverman, Walter H. Manning, John Pugmire, Thomas Barker, Frederick Von Garrell, Thomas Hunt and Louis Behr. The following men furnished their own substitutes, at a cost of four hundred dollars : Charles Leland, .\aron R. Haiglit, Isiuic Richards, A. M. Hungerford, George Ferris, Samuel Horton, Robert Hall, Gideon Mead, Warren Ackernian, Timothy Bennett, Samuel Burpo, W. H. Hustis, Constantine Weiss, Edgar Schiefllein, John Boda, Alexander Masterton, Henry A. Bowerman, Janus H.ay, Aaron M. Diedercr, John M. Masterton, B. F. Bowernian, S. Pnrdy Carton, David Dunham, Robert M. M;isterton, S. Moore, George King, Thomas VV. Atkinson, Edward Kendrick, John Ostrander, 0. L. Underbill. The following men had substitutes furnished by the town at an expense of four hundred and twenty dollars : William M. Harward, Frederick Knolting, John T. Underbill, Samuel Trelese, Henry Hargrave, John Casey, Frederick Sargent, Henry Lins, John W. Coburn, John S. Yorke, M. B. Valentine, Christopher Wintler, John W. Combs, Edward Hoole, John A.. Bowerman. Atacostof four hundred and twenty-five dollars: John Duffy, William Preston, James Joy, August Donges. At a cost of four hundred and ten dollars: Patrick Garvin, .\ndrew Kapp, James Waddock, Andrew Clark. At a cost of four hundred dollars : Timothy Rain, Lawrence Daniels, Nicholas Bowden, Sanford Fleming, Henry Grant. At a cost of four hundred and forty-five dollars : Carl Moser, E. A. Phelps. At a cost of four hundred and fifty dollars: William Traband, Bernard Hufnagel, Lawrence Clemens, William E. Howe, William Purcells, Charles V. Morgan, Frederick Boda, John King, G. W. L. Underhill, Isaac Secor, Joseph D. Disbrow, Samuel B. Wiley, Stephen Higgins. At a cost of four hundred and seventy dollars: Josiah Zabriskie, William H. Oakley. THE CIVIL WAR, 1860-65. 509 At a cost of four hundred and seventy-five dollars: Jiinies Murray, William 1'. Sleight. At a cost of four hundred and ninety-five dollars- John Donlin, liawrence Horton. At a cost of five hundred dollars : Walter B. Conistock, Itaac Weeks, John Cojie, Henry Linderinan, John Mulloy, William Rickcrt, Theodore Horr, John Farley, James Crottey, Henry Lihnian, Withael Jackson, Lewis Gale, George P. Sinn, Anthony Heebe. At a cost of five hundred and twenty dollars : Tillman Holly, John Knapp At a cost of five hundred and ninety dollars : Charles Lamar, Ernest Krbert, William Murphy, Jacob Putney, John Williams, David Jones, Joaquin Jones, Charles E. Manning, William Brown, George Francis, Patrick JIdS'ully, John .Starr, Jolin I'. Min- nich, Edward Dill. Thomas Davis, John A. lliitcliin.'ion, Hugh Callahan, Philip H. Harsiiiger, Henry Haniill, Carey P. Poplin, John Rigby, To- bias .\kerB, John Jolly. Charles Stewart, .Michael Fanning, Timothy G. Ltmib, George W. Dullion, Jolin West, John Smith, Frederick Kline, James Cameron, Lorenzo Covaglio, Wolsley Baxter, Theodore Handy, David Boweu, James Hughes, James Fisher, John Nichols, Jlorris Earle. At a cost of seven hundred and fifty dollars : John F. Jarvis, Joseph Harper, .\mos Wieney, Tim. Crowley, Charles Helwig. At a cost of eight hundred dollars : Francis Scber, Sanford Hallock, John G. Satterlee, Michael Quinlan, Charles Weeks, William H. Dufi', (Jeorge H. Archer, .losejih S. Gregory, Darins Lyon, .Joseph Harper (second call), Oliver U, King, D. Laniour- eaux, Henry Skidmoro, S. G. Vredenburg, David Quackinbush, Christ- ian Stark. At a cost of eight hundred and twenty dollars : Slichael SlcCormick. The following men were drafted and entered the service, receiving the sums set opposite their names : Edwani Barnum, 5450.00; Christian Knapp, $310.00. The only item in the account that is perplexing is one which states that "one recruit" was furnished under the second call for five hundred and ninety dollars, this being, probably, at a time when the draft was nearly over and matters carelessly man- aged. The Grand Army Post.s.— This chapter would, by many, be judged to have been properly completed with the disbandment of the soldiers and the pay- ment of the debts accruing from the Civil War, but the publishers of this history have considered that the real Ixistory of the contest in Westchester County can never be said to be finished till that of the "Grand Army of the Republic," within its borders, be also told. That the writer of the preceding pages should have been requested to add thereto on account of the or- ganization of the Grand Army in the county seems both natural and proper, and he undertakes the ta.sk with willingness, injismuch as there is a great deal of misapprehension, among the people at large, as to the object and scope of action of the body of veterans which e.xi.st.s'undor that name. A brief sketch of the order itself, and of the connection of this county therewith, will prove of interest to all patriotic citi- zens, of whatever faith in politics. The first " post " of the order was formed in one of the Western States, in the year after the close of the war, but it was not till the year 18()7 that the idea was developed into a harmonious whole, with a regular system of military discipline, and the differ- ent units of " post," "department" and " national " headquarters. In its hierarchy, the familiar routine of military life was followed, as tar as [)ossible, with features common to secret social and benevolent societies, following the father of all such bodies — Freemasonry. At the beginning of the organization of the order there was a great deal more of this similarity than now prevails, the initiation being of a solemn character, calculated to try the nerves of the recruits ; the forms of Masonry being imitated by the institu- tion of the successive degrees of "recruit," " soldier " and " veteran " — so called. These degrees were abolished by the National Encampment, a few years after the first formation of the order, and the rules have been simplified in regard to initiations and other points of ritual, till the Grand Army of the Republic can hardly be said to be in any sense a " secret " society, any more than an army in the field, in which the countersign forpa.'^sing a sentry at night is the only thing not patent to all the world. The objects of the order, set forth in the rules and regulations (Chap. 1, Art. 11) are as follows : "1. To preserve and strengthen those kind and fraternal feelings which bind together the sohliers, sailors and marines who united to suppress the late Rebellion, anmer, marine, U. S. Navy; M. H. Ellis, captain, 175th N. Y. ; J. W. Jestly, 2)th N. Y. ; Geo. Heisler, 6th N. Y. ; Archibald Taylor, 10th N. Y. ; John H. Drake, 47th N. Y. ; .Tames Edie, Uth N. Y. ; John B. Whiting, 17th N. Y. ; Ira B. Travis, 11th N. Y. ; HoUis H. Parse, 321 N. Y. ; Janns Brazier, loOth N. Y. ; John Kuester, 12")tli N. Y. ; John W. Coons, second class fireman, U. S. Navy ; Chas. M^olff, bd N. Y. ; D. L. Barton, loth N. Y. Cav. ; David Blauvelt, captain, 22d N. J. ; P. H. Merwin, 22d N. Y. ; Wm. W. Yerks, 6th N. Y. ; Andrew J. Joslyn, 139th N. Y. ; Sherman Smith, musician, 17tli Conn. ; Henry B. Ferguson, 6th N. Y. ; Daniel Batty, 132d N. Y. ; Alfred M. Bowler, J. J. Cunningham, Geo. H. Gale, Joseph Glosque* and Wm. Dykes,* all of 17tli N. Y. ; David Zarr, 127th N. Y. ; Thomas Oliver, 37th N. Y. ; Jas. II. Mealing, 6th N. Y. ; Grilfln Mackey, drnramer, 95th N. Y. ; Wm. L. Halsey, artificer, 1st N. Y. Engineers; E. S. Brown, 37th N. Y. ; H. H. Taylor.* K 6th N. Y. ; Wm. H. Danks, 15th X. Y. ; Philip Emrick, 48th N. Y. ; Thos. C. Lawrence, 17th N. Y. ; Geo. E. H. Wildey, 31st Iowa; Harvey Brower, 2d N. J. Cav.; James Cadis, 25th N. J. ; Frederick .\ngell, 4th N. Y. Cav. ; Joseph Irving, 1st N. Y. Cav. ; Richard Laurie, 2d N. Y. Art. ; S. S. Crane, Sth N. Y. Mili- tia (three months); Wm. Fulton, 4th N. Y. ; William Bates, Uth R. I. ; Robert U. Savage, 72d N. Y. ; Jame< .Sheridan, 5th N. Y. ; L. C. Minor, drum major, 7th Conn. ; Jas. H. Cable, private, 1st N. Y. Engineers ; Matthew Faulds, musician, 79th N. Y. ; James Keeler, private, 15th N. Y. ; Clark Nodine, private, 6th N. Y. ; Robert Allison, private, 36th N. Y. ; E. J. Oliver, landsman, U. S. Navy; E. R. Keyes, chaplain, 6th N. Y. ; Thomas McKay, 6th N. Y. Ait. ; F. G. Howlett, 8th N. Y. ; Thos. Dugan, 5th U. S. Cav. ; Geo. Eimer, Gth N. Y. ; Wm. H. Veitch, lands- man, U. S. Navy; Thos. McMinn,* U.S. Maiines; Oscar T. Barkei, landsman, U. S. Navy ; George Smith, Ist N. Y. Cav. ; J. H Brown, I'.'.Hh N. Y. ; Wm. Svvann, 4th N. Y. Vol. ; C. G. Otis, colonel, 2l8t N. Y. Cav. ; Uenjamiu Bower, 17th N. Y. Vol. ; Joseph Jlills and Wm. .\ngell, loth N. Y. N. G. (three months); J. F. Fiizsimmons, second lieutenant, 'J9th N. Y. ; Herman Mentzer, Ist N. Y. Cav. ; Michael Larkin, 3J Prov. Cav. ; James H. Pooley, assist^mt surgeon, U. S. Vols. ; Edward Keenan, 67th N. Y. ; Andrew McDonald, Sth N. Y. Militia ; Geo. W. Greene, 3'Jth N. J. A'ol. ; Geo. P. Trask,* 74tli N. Y. ; Augustus Bailey, musician, 7th Mass. ; Thomas Scofield, 39th N. J. ; LewLs F. Clark, 1st Conn. ; Chas. H. Carlton,* 4th Ver. ; Julius 0. Hicks, 150th N. Y. ; James Pilson, corporal, (ith N. Y. Art. ; Thos. Feathei-stone, 1st N. Y. Cav. ; C. W. Br.ggs, 6th N. Y. ; James Andrews and Geo. A. Barker, 17th N. Y. ; Edward Knowlden, 31st N. Y. ; Isaac A. Brewer and Johu Loftus, I'. S. Navy ; Stephen P. Grey, 56th N. Y. ; Albert Ludke, Ist N. Y. Cav. ; Louis Springer, 'ItA Conn. ; Chas. H. Pease, 58th Mass. ; Bernard Koch, 52d N. Y. ; Thomas Hill,* I7th N. Y. ; Chas. L. Wilde, musician, 6th N. Y. Art. ; Henry Osterheld, musician, 5th N. Y. ; J. C. Cambell, 17th N. Y. ; Thomas Hawthorn, li6th N. Y. ; Bernard Logue, 17th N. Y. ; Geo. Bowland, Uth N. Y. ; Chas. W. Whitefield, 99th N. Y. ; John McWilliams, 1st N. Y. Cav. ; Solon Lapham, 6th N. Y. ; James Persise, seaman, U. S. I>avy ; Alonzo Grey, private, 50th N. Y. Vol. ; Lewis G. Jones, fireman, U. S. Navy ; Robert Lee, 57th N. Y. ; Michael Hemmingway, 2d N. Y. Cav. ; Martin Coyne, landsman, U. S. Navy ; Job Hargreavee, 6(h N. Y. ; Jere. S. Clark, captain, 2d U. S. Art. ; Jas. W. Brown, oth N. V. ; Wm. Pope, 6th N. Y. ; John C. Light, 150th N. Y. ; James McVicker, 67th N. Y. ; Chas. Grimshaw, 22d N. Y. ; Nelson R. Wood, landsman, U. S. Navy ; E. Edward Wildnian, captain, 1st Conn. Vol. ; Wm. R. Jarman, 7th N. J. ; H. P. Weimar, 3d N. Y. Art, ; Wm. Arbuckle, musician, 17th N. Y. ; John Fyfe,* musician, 178lh N. Y. ; Boyd Vance, corporal, 177th N. Y. ; Wm. Savage, Sth Conn. ; Harry J. Parnell, 5t,th N. Y. ; Thomas Hampson, Gth N. Y. Art. ; Wm. U. Randall, ooth Engineers ; Joseph P. Curtis, Gen. Mounted Service ; Arthur F. Stewart, list N. Y. ; James Auld, acting ensign, U. S. Navy ; Geo. W. Thorpe, 91st N. Y. ; Gilbert llividau, colonel, 37th N. Y. ; Thos. Stansfield, 17th N. Y. ; Chas R. FMsher, 15lh N. Y. ; Christian Shaker, 2d N. Y. Cav.; Frederick Gugel, 2d N. J. Cav. ; Robt. Light, 128th N. Y. ; John_ Merwin, ]U3d N. Y. ; Christian Kaiser, H5th N. Y. ; Geo. Yerks, 1st N. Y. Cav. ; Geo. Grassy, Ist N. Y. Art. ; Chas. Seeloy, 23d U.S. Inf.; Thomas McCall, 17th N. Y. ; James G.Stevens, 12th Jlass. ; Chrystie Sheridan, 96th N. Y. ; Geo. H. King, 49th N. Y. ; Jlichael Sullivan, 96th N. Y. ; John H. Matthews,* sergeant, 12th N. Y. ; John Wallace, sergeant, 23d U. S. Inf. ; Louis Friede, sergeant, 41st N. Y. ; Geo. Voltz, 6th N. Y. Art. ; Peter Whalen, 22d N. Y. ; John Ham- mond, fireman, U. S. Navy ; Wm. Fulton, 4th N. Y. ; Thomas Reynolds,* Goth N. Y. ; David Murray, 2d N. Y. Mounted Rifles ; Albert Seeveis, 22d \ THE CIVIL WAK, 1860-65. 511 N. J. ; .lulin Cahill, 15th N. Y. Militia (tliree months); Dan. Spriiigsteel, 6th N. Y. .Vi t. ; Andrew Stftik, 191st N. Y. ; Thoums Ciirian, diumnier, 22t] N. J. ; Hugh II. Ferguson, 48th N. Y. ; Adrian 11. Hcndriilt, niiisi- ciHU», 8Gth N. Y. ; Wni. Ljiuli, 1st U. S. Art. ; Edward Kiiincv, l)ngler; 9th U. S. Inf. ; Pliilip Riley, .■)th Vet. Vols. ; .Jacob Rtifl, C.lh N. Y. Art.! Jus. Brazier, Sr., h'Sth N. Y. ; Geo. Wilier, :i:id N. .1.; ( has, .1. Luther, 16lh N. Y. Art. ; It. P. Wheeler, sergeant, (i2d N. Y. ; .las. Smith, iOth N. Y. Cav. ; James McLean, 16tli Conn. ; Edward Starr,* .'8lli Mass. ; Jacob II. Lockhard and Geo. Belts, seamen, U. S. Navy ; Alirani Hinchilitr, nth N. Y. Art. ; Chas. B. Nelie, 74th N. Y. ; I'hilip Fisher and John C. Shotts. 17th N. Y. ; Wni. W. Yerks, eth N. Y. Art. ; Daniel Murray and E. A. Jackson, 2d N. Y. Rifles ; Arthur Stewart, 41st N. Y. ; Jacob Gilleo, Gth N. Y. Art. ; John Carey, GUth N. Y. ; Chas. II. 0. Rease, 68th Mass. ; Wm. J. Gardinier, U. S. Navy ; Calvin C. Brown, 0th N. Y. ; Stephen W, Johnson, corporal, 3d N. Y. ; Edward Kcnncy, bugler, 0th U. S. Inf. ; Samuel L. Manus, Kth N. Y. ; George Fink, Gth N. Y. ; James Kairns, 2d N. Y. Art. ; James Auld, ensign, U. S. Navy ; T. M. O'Keefe O'Riley, r>th N. Y. Cav. ; Geo. H. Washington, 11th U.S. Col. Art. ; Michael T. Sullivan, 01st N. Y. ; Patrick Murphy, 18th X. Y. Cav. ; Nathan Buckley, 0th N. J. ; William Carroll, Gth N. Y. Art. ; Augustus Kipp, 32d N. Y. ; Geo. W. Waltei-s, 69th N. Y. ; Garret Majory, 17th N. Y. ; Francis Ilaller* 3d N. J. Cav. ; Wm. Shaw, musician, 17th N. Y. ; Chas. D. Betts, corporal, 132d N. Y. ; Henry Voight, :)tli Vet. Vols. ; James V. Lawrence, Albert Roos and Patrick O'Donnell, 2d N. y. Art. ; Thomas T. Daly, loth N. Y. ; S. 0. Van Ta.ssel, (second muster) Kavy ; John Zimmcr, loth N. Y. Art.; Michael Murphy, Gist N. Y. : John II. Rein, 79th N. Y. ; Conrad Dietrick, 48th N. Y. ; Edward J. Mitchell, 37th N. J.; Andrew Dixon, 3d N. Y. Art. ; John Zeller, 20th N. Y. ; James B. Everest, 51st Mass. ; Daniel Pool, quarter gunner, U. 8. Navy ; John Foley, Gth N. Y. ; John II. Williams, 26th V. S. Colored Troops ; Thomas Ilampson, Gth N. Y. Art. ; Thomas J. Dillon,* COth N. Y. ; John G. Smith, 45tli N. Y. ; Isaac L. Phillips, musician, 17th N. Y. ; Kdward Keenau, G7th N. Y. ; Caleb Wolhuyser, 4th N. Y. Art. ; Dewitt C. Taylor, 17th N. Y. ; Jacob Brill, 2d N. J. ; Bernard Donohue, loth N. Y. ; Wm. Dyke.s 1st N. Y. Rillcs ; James H. Tracy, oGth N. Y. ; Thos. Madden, 32d N. Y. ; David J. Miller, 128th N. Y. ; John Baldwin. I02d N. Y. ; George Humphreys, Hist Mass. ; John F. Doremus, ."jCtli N. Y. ; Conrad Roth, 183d Ohio; li. C. Uickerson, llth N. J. ; G. B. Balch, as- sistant surgeon, 9Sth N. Y. Abraham Vosburgh Post, Ko. 95, of Peekskill. — This post was organized at Peekskill, July 25, 1879, by Comrade Francis M. Clark, of Barbara Freitchie Post, New York City, as mustering officer. The officers of the new post were as follows : Commander, George W. Robertson ; S. V. C, John Smith, Jr. ; J. V. C, Abraham G. Conkling; Sur- geon, Charles McCutchen ; Officer of the Day, Wil- liam A. Sipperly ; Chaplain, William H. Griffin; Quartermaster, Thomas Flockton ; Adjutant, Wil- liam J. Chariton; Officer of the Guard, Samuel Tate; Sergeaiit-Majur, William J. Mahon ; Q. M. Sergeant, William L. Wood. The officer.-^, together with Comrades William Coul, John Acker, Nathaniel J. Travis and Philip H. Sparks, constituted the charter members of the post. The officers of the post remained unchanged for two years, after which Commander Robertson retired and John Smith, Jr., became Commander, all the other officers being promoted one step. In 1882, Abraham ^Conkling became Commander and a further promotion took place. In 1883, Charles McCutcheu became Commander, and held the office for one year. In 1884, William J. Sipperly became Commander. The officers for 1885 were as follows : Commander, William J. Charlton ; Senior Vice-Commauder, George E. Craft ; Junior Vice-Commander, John H. Pierce ; Surgeon, William II. Griffin : Officer of the Day, Joseph L. Mason ; Chaplain, Smith A. Barker ; Quartermaster, Henry S. Free ; Officer of the Guard, Philip H. Spnrks; Scrgeant-Major, Theodore II. Gallagher; Quartermaster-Ser- geant, Marvin li. Smith. Commander, George E. Craft; Senior Vice Conjniander. John H. Pierce ; Junior Vice-Commander, Samuel Tate; Surgeon, William II. GrifRn (since died, vacancy tilled by John W. Acker) ; Oflicer of tho Day, Joseph L. Mason (since removed, vacancy filled by William \ Sipperly) ; Chaplain, Sniitli A Barker: OHicer of the Guanl, Philip F. Sparks ; Quartermaster, Emmett Sarles ; Adjutant, Marvin R. Smith ; Quurtermaster-.Sergeant, William J. Chaillon. The roster of the post, I'urnished by the Com- mander, is as follows, the term of service, where not otherwise mentioned, being three years, the arm of the service infantry, unless otherwise specified. Augustus Acker, Gth N. Y. H. Art.; John W. Acker, corporal, .lOth N. Y., prisoner at .\ndersonville ; Oscar Acker, Gth N. Y. H. Art., ten months; Horace .\nderson, 3d N. Y., si.\ months; John Acker, Gtli N. Y. H. Art., eighteen months; Charles Balluffl,* hospital steward, 1st N. J. Art.; Smith A. Barker, 2d Penn. Res., wounded Sept, 17, 18G2; Josiah Bartlett, Gth N. Y. H. Art.; Wm. M. Bleakley, captain, 27tli N. Y. Jacob Boyce,* two years, Lyman Boyce, Dennis Bradley, G. W. Briggs,* and Stephen W. Byington, all of Gth N. Y. H. Art.; Char. Cable, 124th N. Y., wounded April 25, 18Go ; John Cahill, 3d N. Y. U. Art.; Cornelius D. Callahan, 53d N. Y.; W'illiam J. Charlton, first sergeant, 5th N. Y., commissioned second lieutenant, but not mustered ; St.ates Clark, 5th N. Y., wounded February Glh and March 31, 18C5; Garrett I). Clark, Gth N Y. II. Art.; Abraham G. Conklin, 27th N. Y.; Eber H. Conklin, 13th N. Y. S. M., three months; Daniel Conklin, Gth N. Y. H. Art.; JetTerson Conklin, 2d N. Y. M. Vols ; Samuel H. Conklin,* Gth N. Y. H. Art.; H. S. Constant, Gth N. Y. H. Art.; Wm. Coul, IGSth N. Y.;Geo. E. Craft, corporal, 9th N. Y.; George A. Cruger, Gth N. Y. H. A.; John W. Crumb, chaplain, N. Y. S. M., three months ; Patrick Curtis, Gth N. Y. H. Art.; William H. Denike, 47th N. Y.; ThomUs G. Depew, musician, lG8th N. Y.; James Downes, UOth Ills.; William H. Dutcher, Gth N. Y. H. Art.; Jefferson Dyckman, 2d N. Y. M. Vols.; Harvey S. Elkins, 48tli N. Y.; John Evans, 27th N. Y.; Thomas Flockton, Otli N. Y.; J. Foster, 88th Oliio ; H. S. Free, landsman, U. S. S. " Vanderbilt," one year ; Theo. H. Gallagher, sergt.-maj., 152d N. Y. (gunshot in right leg at Spottsylvania March 12, 18G4); Wm. E. Gallaher, 22d N. Y. S. M. (three months); Anson L. Gilbert, sergeant, Gth N. Y. H. A. ; David R. Goetechius, captain, 0th N. Y. H. A. ; James Gordon, corporal, 90th N. Y. ; Jacob H. Green, landsman, U. S. S. " Vanderbilt" (one year) ; Wm. H. Grilfln, 17th N. Y. (wounded August 30, 1802) ; Henry Ilagaman,! Gth N. Y. II. A. ; James H. Haight, llth N. Y. Cav. ; Charles B. Haines, Gth N. Y. II. A. ; Lemuel Haines, 2d N. Y. Cav. ; Geo. S. Han- cock, sergeant, Gth N. Y. U. A. ; Robert S. Hancock, landsman, U, S. S. "Isonomie;" Jacob Hays, corporal, 8Gtli N. Y. ; John Herschel, mu- sician, Gth N. Y. H. A. ; Henry Hilliker, landsman, U.S. S. '" Isonomie ; " John M. Hilliker, .59th N. Y. (twenty-eight months; ten months iu U. S. Navy) ; Wm. H. Hughes, 0th N. Y ; John Jarrold, 5th N. Y. ; Julius John, first sergeant, 103d N. Y. ; John Kane,* corporal, Gth N. Y. H. A. ; Jacob Keifer,* 14th N. J. ; Anthony Kevan, corporal, I70th N. Y. ; David La Fountain, seaman, U. S. Navy (twenty-one months); Robert D. Lent, Gth N. Y. H. A. ; Wm. A. Lent, landsman, U. S. Navy (one year; ; Ismic McCoy, Glh N. Y. II. \. ; Charles McCntclieoii, second lieutenant, 2d N. Y. Cavalry; Davison McCutcheon, corporal, 2d N. V. Cav. ; Aaron Mackey, Gth N. Y. H. A. ; Wm. J. Mahon,f sergeant, Gth N. Y. H. A. (wounded May 3oth and October 10, 18U4) ; Joseph L. Miuson, corporal, 2d N. Y. Cav. ; David W. Jliller, 4th N. Y. H. A. (thirty-ouu mouths) ; Charles E. Orne, sergeant, Gth N. Y. H. A. (seven months) ; Henry Otis, sergeant, 95th N. Y. ; John H. Pierce, second lieutenant, 2d N. Y. ; John W. Powell, corporal, Gth N. Y. H. \. (wounded May3i), 18G4) ; Eugene B. Pringle,* 5th N. Y. H. A. ; George W. Robertson, first lieutenant, 71st N. Y. S. M. (eight mouths) ; Emmett Sarles, Gth N. Y. H. A. ; James H. Seabury, Gth N. Y. 11. A. ; Cornelius V. Simjikins, 9th N. Y. ; W ui. .\. Sipperly, sergeant, 2d N. Y. Cav. (wounded June 2, 18G4) ; Wm. E. Sloat, Gth N. Y. H. A. ; Charles W. Smith, Gth N. Y. H. A. ; George H. Smith, 91st N. Y. ; George W. Smith, captain, 90th N. Y. ; John Smith, Jr., second lieutenant, Gth N. Y. H. \. (wounded Oc- tober 19, 1864 ; Marvin 11. Smith, landsman, U. S. Navy ; Stephen W. Smith,* musician, lC8th N. Y. ; Philip F. Sparks, Gth N. Y. H. A ; * Deceased. 512 HISTOEY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Stephens S. Starr, Gth N. T. H. A.; Elias Stillwell,* 6th N. T. H. A. Frederick Stockholm, 6th N. Y. H. A. ; Martin Stottler, first lieutenant, 6th Conn.; Samuel Tate, 9th N. T. ; Nathaniel J. Travis, 0th N. Y. H. A. (wounded August 1!), 18G4) ; Elias Tyrrell, 40tli N. Y. ; John E. Valk, 95th N. Y. (woiuidefl October 27, 1864) ; Cornelius B. A'an Horn, ser- geant, 139th N. Y. ; Warren Vau Scoy, 9th N. Y. ; Charles Wiley, drum niajiir, 9th N. Y. ; John N. Williams, 9th N. Y. (five months) ; Samuel Williams, Gth N. Y. H. A. ; William L. Wood, 6th N. Y. H. A. (nine months) ; Charles J. Wright, lieutenant-colonel, 39th U. S. C. T. (two years and seven mouths). Powell Post, No. 117, of Sing Sing. — This post was mustered into service September 5, 1879, by Comrade Henry Osterheld, of Kitching Post, with the follow- ing charter members : Gilbert Deering,t ITlh N. Y.; Abraham Miller, Gth N. Y. H. A.; John Gibney,tl2th U. S. Inf.; William Uell, .VJth N. Y.; Garrett Tenhageu, 56th N. v.; Smith A. Palmer, 18th Conn.; George W. Bell, 2d N. Y.; Charles Ferris,* 1st N. J.; Richard Kromer, SOth N. Y. Battery ; Francis J. Jennings, 17th N. Y.; Daniel Luther,t Gth N. Y. H. A.; William H. Tuttle, 17th N. Y.; Geo. W. Romaine, U. S. S. -'Nyack Jos. B. Eaton, 7th Conn.; A'alentiue Dietrich, G9th N. Y. S. M.; James McCormack, aith N. Y.; Charles F. Rudgers, l(l.3tli N. Y.; A. J. Norricks, l.j7th N. Y.; George E Vau Matten.f 9 th N. Y.; John W. Hoffman, U. S. S. " Vanderbilt ;" Thomas K. Tompkins, 5Gth N. Y.; Wm. G. Hull, 26th N. Y.; Thos. C. Mealing, U. S. S. "Augusta;" William Ward, U.5th N. Y.; Patrick Cullen, 17th N. Y.; James Wilson, 6th N. Y.; William Tuustall, 13th N. Y.; James S. Van Cortlandt, 155th N. Y.; George Nichols, Gth N. Y. H. A.; Charles Schoomaker, 20th N. Y.; Neheniiah Sperry,t "lOth N. Y.; James Young, Gth N. Y. H. A.; Patrick Cannon, 17th N. Y.; William Whiting, Gth N. Y. H. A.; William B. Jones, 4th U. S. Art.; John J. Griffin and Jeremiah McCue, Glh N. Y. H. A.; and Henry C. Hickerson, llth N. Y. Tlie Commanders of the post have been as follows: For 1879 and 1880, Gilbert Dearing; for 18^1, John J. Mahauy and Henry C. Hickerson ; for 1882 and 1883, Henry C. Symouds ; for 1884, Valentine Dieterich ; and for 1885, Chellis 1). Swaiue. The officers for 1886 are, — Commander, S. H. Smith ; Senior Vice-Commander, W. G. Hull ; Jun- ior Vice-Coniniander, George Nichols; Surgeon. George "N'annetta ; Chap- lain, J. Hoffman ; Oliicer of Day, T. Storms ; Officer of Guard, M. Smith ; Adjutant, J. Kling ; Quartermaster, G. Dt-aring ; Sergeant Major, Chellis D. Swain ; Quartermaster-Sergeant, W. Bell. The members of the post, after charter members, are as follows : Patrick Readdy.f 6th N. Y. H. A.; Nelson Baker, 1st U. S. C. T.; Michael Seitz,* 1st N. Y. Engineers; Abraham Tuttle, 6th N. Y. H. A.; George E. Van Wart.f* 5th N. Y. ; Thomas Swords, 1st N. Y. Engineers ; , James Hyland, 13th N. Y. 11. A.; John Connolly, 17th N. Y.; Abrani Jones, 1st N. Y. Cav.; Hemy ('. Symonds, 2d U. S. .\rt.; William W. Ryder, 17th N. Y.; Wm. Nolan, U. S. S. "General Price ;" William H. Caine, 84tli N. Y. S. M. (tliree months) ; Andres J. Disbrow, S7th N. Y.; Chas. P. Turner, U. S. S. " Stars and Stripes ;" Jas. H. Worden, U. S. S. "Morning Light ;" Theodore C. Sherwood, 10?dN. Y.\ Theodore Crofut, 17th N. Y.; Samuel Bennett,-}-* 21»t U. S. C. T.; Charles Maguire, U. S. S '• Princeton ;" Stephen Jackson, 99th N. Y.: Jacob Kling,t 31st N. Y. ; Lockwood Hutchings, Gth N. Y. H. A.; Benjamin H. Sheron,t loOlh N. Y.; George W. Smith, Gth N. Y. Battery ; John J. Mulvany.f 104th N. Y.; Pennington Watson, 186th Pa.; Thomas Donohue, Gth N. Y.; Wm. N. Dands, 1st N Y. Engineei-s ; Henry Hunter, llth N. Y. H. A.; George Augesdorler, GGth N. Y.; Silas W. Edgerton,t 34th Mass.; Orser Sarles, S. S. "Owasco;"' Jas. P. Holmes, F. S..S. -'Vicksburg "; Jno. Daly and Norman Minnerly, Gth N. Y. H. A.; Chellis D. Swaine,t llth N. Y. Cav.; Eli Valentine, 18th N. Y.; Andrew Philips,! 1st Maine Cav.; Wm. B. Ackerly.t U. S. S. " Potomac ;" Harry Terwilliger, 5Gth N. Y.; Jas. McGraw, 43d N. Y. ; Absalom N. IngersoU, U.S. Marine Corps; James D. 0. Stoutenburg, 150th N. Y.; Charles Valentine, lG8th N. Y.; Jamis Hatch, 2d N. Y.; Hiram Osborn, 75th N. Y.; Joseph Holloway, 4th Ohio ; Samuel H. Smith,! llth Conn.; Elbert T. Weeks,t 17tli N. Y.; Joseph King, U. S. S. "Tacony ," William Heunessy, 17th N. Y.; William H. Reynolds, 6th N. Y. H. A.; Frederick Seitz, lOtli U. S. Inf.; Peter Ward, 5th N. Y. H. A.; Sumner A. Smith, 49th N. Y.; John Corning, 35th N. J.; Jesse G. Miiler, Gth N. Y. H. A.; William H. Clark, 51st N. Y.; William Reed, 40th N. Y.; George Allen, 7th N. Y. H. A.; James Arden Haight, IGth N. Y. H. A.; Thomas S. Storms, 24th N. Y. Battery; Thos. McGee, 5th Conn.; Arthur Bushel, 1st N. i'. Cav.; Alexander Helsey, 7th N. Y. H. A.; George Wheeler, 14Gth N. Y.; John J. Murphy, 7th N. Y. H. A.; Joseph C. Newman, 40th N. J.; Joseph Roderiques, U. S. S. "Mississippi;" Albert Drehfall, 58th N. Y.; S. J. Chambers, 7th N. Y. S. M. (three months); Hugh Murphy, U.S.S."Anacosta ;" Michael Smith, 1st N. Y. Engineers; Charles B. .Johnson. 5th N. Y. H. A.; Peter Parker, U. S. S. "North Carolina ;" Benjamin Harris, 15th N. Y. H. A.; Hiram Van Tassell, 95th N. Y.; and Augustus Stockholdt,* 22d N. Y. Vol. McKeel Post, No. 120, of Katonah.—TYns, post was organized September 30, 1879, the mustering officer being Comrade Herman W. Thum, of Koltes Post, New York City. The charter members were,— E. B. Newman, J. T. Lockwood, E. S. Folsom, S. S. Austin, Clark See, W. L. Hull, A. S. Knapp, E. A. Teed, Charles , Fisher, Edgar Hitt, J. B. Turner, Charles Corbyn, E. H. Avery, C. W. Varian, A. P. Quick and James A. Tuttle. The Commanders of the post to date are as follows : For 1879, 1880 and 1881, E. B. Newman ; for 1882, Edgar Hilt ; for 1883, W. L. Hull ; for 1884, E. S. Folsom ; for 1885, E. A. Reynolds. The officers for 188b are as follows : Commander, Abraham Knapp; Senior Vice-Conimander, A. P. Quick; Junior Vice-Comnuinder, W H. Dingee ; Surgeon, D. F. Avery ; Chap- lain, C. Corbyn ; Officer of Day, Edgar Hitt ; Officer of Guard, G. M. Avery ; Adjutant, E. S. Folsom ; Quartermaster, J. A. Tuttle ; Sergeaut- Jlajor, K. .\. Reynolds. The names of comrades of the post not dropped at the time of the report are as follows : E. B. Newnian,t sergeant, 48th N. Y. (wounded, Andersonville pris- oner, leg amputated) ; J. F. Lockwood, f 4th N. Y. U. A.; E. S. Folsom, 1st N.J. Art.; S. S. Austinf first lieutenant, Gth N. Y. H. A.; Clark See,t 4th N. Y. H. A.; W. L. Hull, Gth Conn.; A. S. Knapp, E. A. Reed, Edgar Hitt, A. P. Quick, R. A. Reynolds, G. G. Ferguson, D. W. Miller, all of 4tli N. Y. H. A.; J. B. Turner, U.S.S. ' Gi^fysburg ;" Chas. Corbyn, 170th N. Y,; E. H. Avery, Gth N. Y. H. .V.; C. W. Varian, sergeant, 165th N. Y.; J. A. Tuttle, 2d N. Y. Cav.; D. F. Avery, 38tli N. Y.; J. N. Purdy.t Gth U. S. Inf ; George M. Avery, 5th N. Y.; W. 11. Dingee, 150th N. Y.; Richard Wheatley, chaplain, 28th Conn.; C. M. Sarles, 4th N. Y.; Jarvis Pugsley, 48th N. Y.; L. E. Miller, 84th Pa. Morell Post, No. 144, of Sing Sing. — This post was organized on the 18th of December, 1883, at Sing Sing, N. Y., princijnilly from members of Powell Post, in the same town, and now numbers the following of- ficers and members : Commander : Silas W. Edgerton, chaplain of Sing Sing Prison. Com- mander Edgerton's military record is an excellent one, he having en- tered the service as a private in the 34th Slass. in 1862, and being dis- charged as captain and brevet-major in the 192d N. Y. Vols., after a period of three and one-half years. Commander Edgerton w as wounded at Mine Run, Va., on the 20th of July, 1864, a piece of shell taking ef- fect in liis right breast and rendering amputation of the right arm necessarj'. Since the war he has become a clergyman, and is respected wherever he is known. Senior Vice-Commander: Hiram Osboril, first lieutenant of the 75th N. Y. ; promoted from the ranks, with three yeai-s' service. Junior Vice-Commander : William W. Ryder, ex-private of the 17th N. Y., with two years' service. Officer of the Day : Sumner Smith, ex sergeant, 49th N. Y., three years. Surgeon : George W. Bell, 2d N. Y. Cav., three years. t Wounded iu action. * Dead since muster. t Wounded. * Dead since muster. THE CIVIL WAR, 1860-65. 513 Quartermaster: Nchciuiali Sperry, 1st Sergeant, 49th N. Y., throe years. Clia|ilaiii : llciirv AUiiii, ITtli ('oiiii., two and oue-half years. A
  • ilaiit|: .lames jMiCoruiii k, ;ilth N. Y. aud 'Jil N. V. Cav., lour yeare ami a hall' in serviie ; wuiindeil in thigh and hip by Knfield bullet, at Cedar Creek, iu cavalry engagenicut, November 12, 1804. tlllieer of the liuard : liarrett Teu Ilagen, corporal, 5Gth N. Y., with four and a half yeare' service. yuarlerniaster-Scrgeant : A. J. Kowicki, 15(itl> N. Y., two and a half yeai*s' service. Sergeant-Mnjor : .loliu L. Knapp, second lieuttmint, ISth N. Y. S. 51., with one and a half years' service. The nieinbcrs are as tullows : Joseph B. Eaton, lieuteuaut, Ttli Conn., three years ; .\brani .loncs, captain, 1st N. Y. t'av., three and a ijuarter years : Abraham 11. Miller, 6th N. Y. II. A., eighteen months; John J. Gritlin, sergeiiut, Otli N. Y. H. A; two and a half years ; William II. Clark, 51st \. Y'., discharged after eighle<'n months tor wound received at Second Bull Kun in lJ L. Malion, sergeant, (ith N. Y. II. A., three years; li. S. Sheron, ISlltli N. Y., two ami a half yeare (wounded SOth May, 18fi4, at Bethlehem Church, Va., and l'.)tli October, at Cedar Creek) ; John Ni.xon, 3(1 N. Y., two and a half yeare; Joseph Ilubbel, 2:id N. Y. S. SI., thirty- Dim- days ; Henry Tw itchell, .id Miiss. II. A., two and a half yeaiis ; S. J. (Ihamliers, 7th N. Y. S. M., three months ; Charles K. Lewis, U. S. S. "Nyack,'' nine months ; Pennington Watson, sergeant, IStith Pa., two jreai's;liilnian Rico. l.Sdth I'a., tw o year« ; Geo. .\yles, 17th N.Y., two years; Clement C Moon, tint lieutenant, iOth Mass., six months ; Wm. Kelsey, Coriioral, IXIlth Pa., two years; Oscar Knajip, tii-st sergeant, 4tli N. Y. H. \., tliree years; and Keuben Bunyea, no record given by the ad- jutant. The ofticers for 188(J are as follows : Commander, Silas W. Edgertun; .Senior Vice-Commander, Iliram Os- born ; Junior Vice-('onimander, William W. Uyder ; Surgeon, Samuel J. Chamhei's ; Cliaplaiii, James o. Knapp; Ulhcer of Day, .Mprani Jones; Officer of Guard, Wm. II. I lark; .^djutjtnt, James McCorniick ; l^nar- tcmiaster, Nehemiah Sperry ; Sergeaut-JIajor, John L. Knapp; Quarter- master-Sergeant, .\uselni J. Nowicki. Sfeivart Hart I'ost, No. ]()!), of Mount KUco. — This post was organized and mustered into service on the 21st day of July, J88(t, on the nineteenth anniversary of the battle of lUiU Run, by Comrade Herman \V. Thuni, of Koltes Post, 32, of New York City. The charter members were : George W. lieil, K. T. Bailey, William Bird, O. Clark, Geo. W. Cutler, Matthew Cutler, Edward ( liapin, I riali Dingee, .\le.\ander Hamilton, Henry E. lltitchins, James llill, .\rthur Matthews, James Matthews, Benjamin E. Merritt, .\. J. Osborne, Wesley Piei-sall and Franz Seitz. The officers of the post to date are as follows : Commanilers: E. T. I};iiley, lor 18811, 1881 and 1882 ; George Beil, 1883 ; P.K. H. Sawyer, 1884 ; E. T. Bailoy, 188.5. Senior Viec-Comniandei-s : Ale.\ander Hamilton, 188i) ; Wni. Baird, 1881 and 1882 ; Samuel W. Palmer, 188:!, 1881 and 1SS.5. Junior Vice-Commanders: C. W. Piei-sall, 1880 and 18.S1 ; Samuel W. Palmer, 1882 : W. T. Cole, 1883 ; Wesley Picrsall, 1884 and 188."). Surgeons: None in 1880; L. F. Pelton, 1881, 1882 and 1883; Uriah Bingec, 1884 and 188.'). Chaplains: O. Clark, 18.S(); D.T). Gritlin, 1881 ; P. K. 11. Sawyer, 1882 ; A.J.Osborne, 188:! ; Merritt .\. Louden, 1884 ; Bernard .\. Mulvcy, 188.'j. Officers of the Day : George W. Cvitler, 1880, 1881 and 1882 ; Daniel Wood, 1883, 1884 and 18S.5. Officers of the Guard : Uriah Dingee, 1880, 1881 ; Daniel Wood, 1882, 1883 and 1884; Henry E. Hutchins, 18S5. Quarterma.* I). Loudon, f sergeant, Ktth Connecticut I wounded and a pensioner) ; Daniel Wood, 57th N. Y'. V.; Charles Itay- inond,5th N. Y. II. Art.; Elisha Ferris, 6th N. Y'. H. Art.; George W. .Vckerly, 1st N. Y'. Mounted Rifles (two years) ; Daniel Gritlin, North Atlantic Scjuadron (clerk) ; Thomas J. Ackerman.t 6th N. Y. H. Art. (lost right arm by a cannon-ball and a pensioner); J. W. Farrington, nth N. Y. H. Art.; Charles P. Kennedy, otli N. Y. H. Art.; Hiram Smal- ley and Alexander Yerks, 6th N. Y. H. Art.; Israel T. See, 17th N. Y. V.; Elisha B. Sarles,t 4'.)th N. Y'. V. (wounded in the Wililerne.ss and a pen- sioner) ; William Louden, t 5tli N. Y'. H. .\rt. (wounded at Locust tlrove, Va., Nov. 24, 1863, ami a pensioner) ; John Palmer, 12ilth N. Y. V.; Philip Ilon'inan, 3i'th N. J. V. (one year) ; James Feeks, 12th N. Y. V. (wounded and a pensioner) ; Tliom:is Ryan, 7th N. Y'. Y. (eighteen months) ; C. Van Tassell, 5th N. Y'. V. ; E. Reilly, 5th N. Y. H. Art. (eighteen months) ; Edward Tucker, 16tli Veteran Reserve Corps ; .\brah. Forkhill, 1st N. Y. Mounted Rifles (two years) ; Wm. A. Beekinan, 4th N. Y'. H. .\rt. (twen- ty-one months) ; Geo. W. Fosliay, 6th N.Y'. 11. .\rt.; Wm. Braun,t 2d U. S. .\rt. (wounded and a pensioner) ; Bernard A. Mulvey, landsman on U. S. S. "Santee" ; John Dexter, 6tli N. Y. H. Art. Sinec organization of post the following members have died : Daniel D. Miller, 6th N. Y. H. .\rt. (a three years' man who died Jan- uary 13, 1885) ; L. F. Pelton, surgeon, U. S. V. (died September 17, 1883) ; Harvey Ferris, ,5th N. Y. II. Art. (three years, died Septembers, 1881); P. ILK. Sawyer, assistant surgeon, H2dN. Y. V. (died JlarchSl, 1885). This closes the record of the post, for which I am indebted to the kindness of Comrade Beil, its first organizer. No list of officers for 1886 furnished. Com- rade Beil has been since transferred to Farnsworth Post. Farnsworth Post, No. 170, of Mount Vernon. — This post was organized on the 22d day of July, 18S0, and mustered into service by Comrade Henry Osterheld, of Kitching Post, No. (JO, of Yonkers. The charter members were as follows : .lames N. Jenkins, F. Whittaker, .lolin G. Fay, And. Bridgeman, Geo. W. Hertholf, N. Van Ilorson, Wm. Wilson, Jr., I). E. Horton, Wm. G. Thiselton, J. L. D. Biker, Frederick Sauter, Simon Sternhagen. The officers of the post to date are as follows : Commanders : James H. Jenkins, 1880, 1S81 and 1882 ; Frederick Whit- taker, 1883 ; Nathan Van Ilorson, 1884 and 1885. Senior Y'ice-Commanders : F. Whittaker, 1880 and 1881 ; John G. Fay, 1882 ; Nathan Van Uorson, 188:1 ; and Joseph H. Porter, 1884 and 1.S85. Junior Vice-Commanders : John G. Fay, 1880 and 1881 ; Nathan Van Horson, 1882; Wm, Wilson, Jr,, 1883 ; Wm. A. Anderson, 1884 ; Henry S. Spronll, 1885. Chaplains : Nathan Van Horson, 1880 and I88I ; Joseph 11. Porter, 1882 and 1883 ; Stephen P. Hunt, 1884 and 1885. t Wounded. 514 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Surgeons : George W. Bertholf, 1880 ; Charles J. Nordquiet, 1881 ami 1882; Julius Dieckman, 1883; J. Q. A. Hollister, 1884 and 1885. Officers of tlif Day : Wm. Wilson, Jr., ISSO, 1881 aiid 1882; Samuel Tieliaut, 1883 ; J. L. D. Riker, 1881 ; John G. Fay, ISSf). Officers of the Guard: J. L. D. liiker, 1880, 1881, 1882 and 1883; Will. II. Mercer, 1884 anil 188.5. t^uarteruiastei-s : Andrew Bridgeman, 188t) ; Samuel Tiehaut, 1881; Herman VVei.^s, 1882, 1883,1884 and 188."). Adjutants: W. G. Tliiselton, 1880, died; Wm. A. Anderson, 1880, 1881 and 1882; James U. Jenkins, 1883 and 1884; Wm. Wilson, Jr., 188.'). Sergeant-Major : John II. Davis, 1880 to 1885. Quarterm;ister-Sergeant : George W. Van Pelt, 1882 to 1885. The offit-ers for 188(5 are a.s follows : Commander : James H. .lenkins (fourth term). Senior Vice-Comniander : Joseph 11. Porter (third term). Junior Vice Commander : John H. Davis. Cliaplain : Stephen P. Hunt (third term). Officer of the Day : J. L. D. liiker. Snrgeon: J. Q. A. Hollister (third term). Officer of the Guard : \Villi:im H. Mercer (second term). .Adjutant: William Wilson, Jr. (second term). Qnarternia-ster : Henry S. SprouU. Past Commanders : Nathau Van Uorson, George W. lieil. The names of the comrades of the post are as fol- lows, with their regiments and military history in brief: James N. Jenkins, captain, 23d C. V., throe years; F. Whittaker, ^ lieutenant, 6th N. Y. Cav., four years: John G. Fay, captain, 3d N. V. Inf., three yeai-s; A. Bridgeman, sergeant, 5tli N. Y. Cav., three years; W. (i. Tliiselton,*t firet sergeant, 6tli N. Y. H. Art., three years ; Win. Wilson, Jr.,t Ciiptain, 33d N. J. Inf., four years : N. Van Xorson,t pri- vate, 7'.nh N. 1'. Inf., three years ; D. E. Norton, private, (ith N. V. II. Art., three years ; J. L. D. Kiker, private, 14tli N. \. Inf., three years : (ieorge Bertholf. i>rivate, 31ith N. J. Inf, nine months; Freil. Sauter,* private, 8th X. Y. H. .Vrt , two yeai-s ; Oliver Koot,t private, (ith X. Y. 11 .\rt., three years ; S. O. Howe, private, 8tli N. Y. M., three months; Henry S. Sproull, private, 71st N. Y'. M., three months ; Wni. A. .Ander- son, hospital steward, V. S. A., three and one-half years; Samuel Tie- bant, second lieutonant, .'itli N. \. Inf.. two years ; James B. Spici'r, private, 22d N. Y. M., three niuntlis ; Simon Sternhagen, sergeant, 1st N. Y. M. R., three years and four months ; Michael Redmond,* sergeant, 127th N. Y. Inf., three years ; Leonard D. Tice, captain, 5th Vermont, three yeara : C. J. Nordipiist, major, iltli N. Y. S. M., three years; Vin- cent .Morgan, Oth X. Y. 11. Art.; John L. Tice,«t private, oth VeniionI, three yeai-s; John L. Piper, private, 11th N. Y. V., s<'Veninonths ; New- ton C. Dealing, private, 33d N. J. V., three years ; Joseph H. Porter, corporal, 13th N. V. Cav., two years ; Jacob Schetiermann, 17th N. Y'. S. M., thirty days ; S. M. Saunders, captain, l.'>8lh N. Y"., three months ; H. S. Sclienck. private, 3stli N. Y'., two years ; Herman Slagle, private. 1st N. Y. v., fouryears; H. C. Weiss, sergeant, lith N. Y. H. Art., three years ; George Van Pelt, sergeant, l.")8th N. Y., three years; John II. Davis, private, 12th N. Y., oiic> year ; Stephen P. Hunt, private, 8lh N. Y. H. .\rt., eighteen mouths; .\Ifred Coidey, captain and brevet ma jor, l.')6th N. v., three years; (iideon D. Pond, private, 10th Conn., four months ; (Jeorge II. Urown, sergeant, Gth Ind. N. Y. liiittery, three years ; Valentine M. Hodgson, first sergeant and brevet captain, ral, Ist X. Y. Cav., four years ; Julius Dieckman,* niiijor, 15th X. Y". U. .\rt., four years and six months ; John P. Kraeher, private, lith N. Y". II. Art., two years and nine months ; N. Buckley, i>rivate, 9th N. J., two years and one month ; Paul Wagner, private, 4lBtX. Y., three years; John Zimmer, private, 1.5th N. Y. H. Art., one year and nine months; T. M. t Wounded. * Died. Reilly, first lieutenant, 5th N. Y. Cav., four years and two months ; Da" vid C. Curtis, quartermaster, 173d N. Y., one year ; John S. Tyler, corpo- ral, 7th Mich., 15tb V. S., three years ; L. -\. Van Buskirk, private, :«d N. J., two years ; Nelson Jenkins, private, 39th N. J., nine months ; Chas. J. Chatfield, first lieutenant, 23d N. Y., three years and four mouths ; George W. Cooper, captain. 71st N. Y., two years and three months ; John SIcier,t sergeant, 52dN. Y., three years ; Oscar II. Riker, private, oth X. J. Battery, one year and eight mouths ; Jerome Chappell, quar- termaster-sergeant, 82d N. Y., three yeare ; J. 0. A. Hollister,! cap- tain, 112th X. Y., three years ; David Lyon, private, .38th N. Y., two years and three months ; J. Stewart, private, 8th Wise, one year : Wm. H. Mandeville, sergeant, 5th N. Y". Ind. Battery, three years. This closes the record of the Post to date. Since the above was written T. Whittaker has left the Post and joined Chas. Lawrence Post, No. 387, of Port Chester. H. B. Hidden Post, No. 330, of City /s/a«(Z.— This post was organized by Comrade James H. Jenkins, of Farnsworth Post, January 27, 1883. The charter members were, — (Jeorge E. Pinckney, first lieutenant, 131st X. Y.; Oswald Bergen, U. S. S. "Santee ; Joseph H. Glazier, 84th N. Y.; William Sconsbough, U. S. S. " Wissahickou ; " Henry Buhre t ^Sth N. Y.; Theodore Bishop, r. S. S. " San Jacinto ; " Eugene Heed, 32d " Maine ; " S. T. Graham, r. S. X.; William K. Miller, oth X. Y.; George W. Banta, 17t;th X. Y.; and Jerome Bell, 1st X. Y. Cav. Since organization the following have been mustered into the post : Richard Sherwood, 135th N. Y.; E. H. Gurney, 8th N. Y'. Cav.; John S. Serord, (ith N. Y. H. .\rt.; Williaui McGloiu, U. S. S. "Vincennes;" Michael Egaii, 45th X. Y.; John JlcXaniara, 1st X. Y. 51. Rifies ; Robert Brown, Ellsworth Zouaves; Thom;is JlcCarty, 1st X. Y. Cav. The Commanders of the post to date arc as follows : Jerome Bell, 1883 ; George E. Pinckney, 1884; Jerome Bell, 1885. During the past year this Post has moved its head- (juarters to New York City. Charles Lairrence Post, No. 378. — This post was or- ganized on the 29th of May, 1883, and mustered into service by Comrade Frederick Whittaker, of Farns- worth Post No. 170, of Mount Vernon, in time for Decoration Day. The charter members were : liicbanl Enoch, Charles De Mott, J. J. Martin, Matthew Dougbtss, Whitman Sackett, .lohn E. Weed, W. II. Mosier, J. A. Louden. George Bulkley, Henry Diet/., Nicholas Fo.\, Daniel Booth, Thomas IVIcGoverD. The officers of the post to date are a.s follows: Commanders: Richard Enoch, 1883 and 1884; Charles De Mott, 188.5. Senior Vice-Commanders : J.J.Martin, 1883; John Foran, 1884 and 188.'.. Junior Vice-Commanders : Whitman Sackett, 1883 ; .\rdemas Barnes, 1884 ; Nicholas Fox, 1885. Surgeons: William H. Hyler, 1883; X.J. Sands, 1884 and 1885. Chaplains ; John E. Weed, 18,S3 and 1884 ; W. F. Wakefield, 1885. Officer of the Day : George Bulkley, 188;!, 1884 and 18,S5. Officers of the Guard : Xichobis Fox, 18.83 and ISM ; R. Foskey, 1885. Quartermasters : William H. Mosier, 188:j and 18.>i4 ; H. Dietz, 1885. Adjutants: Charles De Mott, 1883 and 1884; William II. Hyler, 1886. Sergeant-Major : C. S. Higgins, first appointment, 1885. Ouarterinaster-Sergeant : A. Barnes, first appointment, 1885. The officers for 188() are as follows : t Wounded. THE CIVIL WAR, 18(j0-65. 516 ConimanJer, John Foraa ; Senior Vice-Coiiiniander, Nicholas i'ox,; Junior Vico-C'uninmnilor, Cliarlcs Hughes ; Surgeon, Dr. N. J. SanJs ; Chaplain, Rev. W. F. Wakofleld ; Officer of tlie Day, George \V. Hiilk- ley; Officer of the Guard, .(ohn A. lioudcn ; Adjutant, Uicluvrd Enorli ; Quartcrmitstcr, William 11. llyler; .Sergeant-Major, Charles de Mott ; Qnarterniarter-Sergeant, Henry Diet/.. The following is a list of the comrades of the post to date, with a record of service : Nicholati Fo.\, 28tU ('onn., three years; Daniel Booth, 17th Conn., three years; Charles Hocple, '2Sth Conn., three yeai-s; John Sherwood, lOUi ('4)nn., thrpe years ; J. H. Kascoe.t otli (Nmn., three yeara ; .Mbro Weir.t i'ltli Conn., three yeai-s ; Cliarli-s Mughe.s, luth I'onii., Iliree years; William H. Bailey, (itli Conn, three yeara; W. Sackett,t 17th Conn., three years; J. A. Louden, 17th Conn., three years; John Foran, 1st Miiss. H. Art. ; H. D. Cordner, Ist Mass. H. Art., three yei>s: T. J. (Vdes, .'ith Mass. Vid., three years; H. M. Lisle, Ist N. Y. Vol., three years ; ,\rdenias Hiirnes, .\niu£a Conover, Henry l»ietz,f Geo. Buckley and J. J. ^lartin, all of 17th X. Y. Vol. (the I'oit Chester com- pany! ; William Sniith.t 7llth N. Y. Vol., three years ; G J. McBride, 97th X. Y. Vol., three years; Stephen lUuxomel.t 127th N. Y: Vol., three yeare ; Alex. McBride, 4'.lth X. Y. Vol., three years ; A. J. Maris. 65th X. "k. Vol , three yeai> ; U. L. IMace, 127th N. Y. Vol., three yeai-s; Fred. Brittnor, 74tli X. Y. Vol., three years ; diaries De Mott, 22d X Y. Vol., three years ; W. H. Madden, liOd X. Y. Vol., throe years ; Wallace McBride, KWth N. Y. Vol., three years ; I). A. BntterHeld,t 51st N. Y. Vol., three years; M. Billingtou, .'15th N. Y. Vol., three years ; M. Dougliuss, 7'.ilh X. Y'. Vol., three yeare; K. Baruch,t 7th N. V. Vol., three years; J. McGovern, 82d .\. Y. Vol., three years ; K ichard Enoch, f Sad N. Y. Vol., three years ; J. K. Weed, 4iPth N. Y. Vol., three years ; Junes B. Lynch, llt'Jth I'a. Vol., three yeans; G. L. Drnnien, 1st X. J. Vol., three yeai-s; Kdward Knott, f 3d N.J. Vol., three years; Wilhani F. Wakefield, 2d N. Y. Art., three y»ars ; C. S. Higgins, 4th X. Y. H. Art., three years ; William II. Mosier, W. H. Hees, S. D. Burger, TlioniiL-i J, Halpiii,! Sullivan tiockwood and John Hughes, all of the (>th X. Y. H. Art., three years ; B. Foskey,'.lth N. Y. Cav., Kdwin Cluiicli,f 2d N. Y. 0»v., (i. K. Blackniaii,t lid X. Y. Cav., all three years ; William II. liy- IcrwHS in the l.'iOth N. Y'. Vol., and also in the V. S. S. " Wateree, " for the whole jieriod of the war, and after ; Thomas G. Sutton belonged t j the Veteran Volunteer Battery of Xew Y'ork State. Of the New York State Militia, niu.stered into the United States service for periods of three months or more, there are : Ilenry Dietz, J. J. Post and E. F. Terhune, 71st ; X. J. Sands, l.'.tli ; 0. H. Kniffen, loth ; William Morrison, l.'itli ; George E. Jurdine, 37th Bcgiments. Cromwell Post, No. 466, of White Plaim. — This post was organized March 19, 1884, by Comrade James H. Jenkins, of Farnswortli Post. The charter members were Valentine M. Hodgson, Edward B. Long, John C. Verplanck, George W. Brown, Edward W. Bogart, Henry I. Williams, Berlin K. Palmer, David P. Barnes, George W. Coventry, James S. Snedeker, Richard Roach, Charles Whiston and George Lewis. Valentine M. Hodgson Wiis Commander for 1884, and the officers for 1885 were Commander, Edward B. Long; S. V. C, Crawford N. Smith; J. V. C, Cleorge W. Coventry ; Surgeon, David P. Barness ; Chaplain, David W. Bogart ; Officer of Day, George W. Brown ; Officer of Guard, Henry J. Williams ; Adjutant, Edward W. Bogart; Q. M., Berlin H. Palmer ; Q. M. S., James McCarty. The following is a list of the members, with their military history in brief : Valentine M. Hodgson, first lieutenant, 67th N. Y'.; Edward I!. Long, IstN. J.: John C. Verplanck, musician, :t2d N. V.; George W Hrown, .i.3d Ky.; James S. Snedeker, landsman, gunboat "Jlybiscus;" Berlin H. I'almer, .^Ist X. Y.; Edward W. liogart, 'J.5tli X. V.; David I'. Barnes, firat sergeant, (ith N. Y. II. .\it.; K. Uoach and H. I. Williams, fith N. Y. II. Art.; George W. Coventry, 4(ltli N. Y. ; Charles B. Whiston, 27th N. v.; Robinson W. Smith, 711111 N. Y.: Sidney Marline, :i2d X. v.; James H. Bmlway, :?Sth X. Y.: Daniel W. Flandiow, '.).')th N. Y.; Daniel W. Bogart, ill ummer, !l5tli X. Y.; James .\. McCarty, 4tli X. Y'.; George H. Morse, 2'.ltli Mass.; Oscar Stephens, .Ith N. Y.; Crawford X. Smith, lid V.S. Inf.; Thomns Rush, lt«4th N. V.; Henry A. Maynard, 21st X. Y.; .lolin I.owry, lid Refjt. I'rov. X. Y. (,'av.; John Simnioiis, 49tli N.Y.; Alexander Jones, 12Xth \. V.; Itenjainin S. Dick, 22d X. V. S. M.; Mervin Sniffin, I'ltli X. Y. H. Art.; J. (i. Spencer, yeoman, U. S. S., "Katah- din ; " Stanley F. Newell, 37th N. Y. Ward B. Burnett Post, I\tli X. Y. .\rt.; Sergeant-Major: George W. Farnum, corporal, 2Ud Conn. yuartermaster-Sergeaut; Tlios. Ewing, bievet niiijor general, .\rmy of the Fioiilier. t Wounded. 516 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. CHAPTER X. WESTCHESTER COUNTY AT THE PRESENT DAY. BY J. THOMAS SCHAKF, A.M., LL.D. One has but to glance at any good map of New York City to realize what must with almost absolute certainty be the rare good fortune of Westchester County. The great metropolis has already stretched its briarean arms in all directions from its northern limits, and its geographical necessities compel it to spread outward like a fan over the surface of West- chester County. Its present corporate shape may be compared to the Cleopatra's needle, which now forms one of its notable monuments. The city is, in fact, a rude obelisk, with its base on the boundary line of Yonkers and its apex at the Battery. The general uniformity of the outline is preserved on the one side by the East River and on the other side, and much more regularly, by the Hudson. These great water highways necessarily interpose a formidable obstacle to the spread of population in either direction, and although the introduction of steam ferriage and the construction of the Brooklyn bridge have modified the inconveniences of tran.sit across broad rivers, the gen- eral trend of population continues to the northward. Elevated railroads and the development of transpor- tation facilities have brought all portions of the county within easy reach, and New York is steadily absorbing the outlying territory. Morrisania and Fordham have already been appropriated, and, with the accelerated ratio of increasing population, the day is probably not far distant when almost the entire county will have become little more than a suburb of New York. A writer of twenty years ago,' speaking of the con- templated imjjrovements beyond the then northern boundaries of the city, says : " Assuredly this region will be the site of the future magnificence of this me- tropolis. During the coming five or ten years the Fifth Avenue will no doubt be soonest built up, and built up grandly, but the city will not stop on that account; it will be succeeded by an age of imperial magnificence. That will be the day for the now ne- glected west side of the island. The poetical prophecy, ' Westward the star of empire takes its way,' and which is fast becoming historical truth, will re- ceive another illustration." Much of this prediction has already been realized and a comparatively brief period in the future may be expected to work a won- derful transformation in the physiognomy of those portions of Westchester County which as yet have not assumed the distinctively urban character. While the people of Westchester may felicitate themselves on the added prosperity and increase in values of property which the change will involve, they will have to deplore the inevitable loss in picturesque- ness, beauty and variety of interest which the county now presents to the eye in such eminent degree. Cities are ruthless destroyers of rural scenery. They fill up the bosky dells, demolish the picturesque crag and towering hill, mow down the lordly giants of the forest and annihilate the general aspect of rural love- liness and peace. The least sentimental of land- owners must regret the inflow of urban population, when, as in Westchester, it involves the destruction of as lovely bits of landscape as the eye of man ever rested on. Traversed by picturesque ridges and romantic streams, with the blue expanse of Long Island Sound on the one side and the lordly Hudson on the other, the county is exceptionally favored by nature, and there is no strip of territory of equal extent in the whole country which combines in the same degree advantages of location and beauty of sur- face with the artificial adornments wrought in the lapse of many generations by intelligent direction and skill. While the bolder beauties of the Hudson are not comprised within its limits, its territory adjacent to the borders of that classic stream has long been a favorite theme for song and story. Cooper, Paulding and Irving have drawn a rich store of literary mate- rial from within its confines, and the bold, original genius of Poe found much of its inspiration while the poet was roaming along the banks of the river or gazing from the windows of his little cottage at Ford- ham. The development along the shore of the Hudson is a striking indication of what may be anticipated for the whole of Westchester County. " The whole re- gion of country bordering the Hudson River, north of Spuyten Duyvel," says a writer,- " was, until within a very recent period, occupied by isolated residences and grand estates, some of them embracing several thousand acres. Notable examples were the Philipse and Livingston Manors, the titles to which came di- rectly from the crown. Gradually these extensive tracts were sub-divided, leaving still, however, large areas in the possession of single individuals. Many of these smaller estates have undergone a process of improvement and embellishment, until the lordly mansions on the Hudson have become famed on both sides of the Atlantic for their beauty and picturesque surroundings. . . . Art has done its share to add to the charms of the landscape. Here are the resi- dences of many leading New Yorkers, — elegant, com- fortable homes, surrounded with tastefully ornament- ed grounds, and presenting all the evidences of that domestic enjoyment which is, after all, the sun of human happiness." Following the course of the Hudson within the boundaries of Westchester County, we pass in succes- 1 Tlie Growth of New York, New York, 1865, p. 42. - Description and Map of Castle Sidge, Tarrytuwn. WESTCHESTER COUNTY AT THE PRESENT DAY. 517 sion through many noted localities. The first point of interest is High Bridge, now within the corporate limits of New York, winch carries the waters of the Croton Reservoir across the valley of tiic Harlem River at an elevation of one hundred feet, and is one of the noted engineering triumphs of the world. The hamlet of King's Bridge is charmingly located in a beautiful valley, near the point where the Harlem flows into the Hudson. High, rolling liiils encom- pass it, on the crests of which are fortifications and finegrowtiis of timber.* The locality was first selected by the Dutch as the site of their projected city. New Amsterdam, but afterwards abandoned. After leaving King's IJridge we approach the city of Yonkers, the largest town in the county, pausing by the way to take a glance at Vort Washington and the Spuyten Duyvel. From IManhattanvillc to Fort Washington, two miles below Spuyten Duyvel, the shore line presents a fine range of heights, once hand- Westchester County proper begins at the Spuyten Duyvel. The scenery in the immediate vicinity is very fine. At Riverdale Station, on the Hudson liiver Railroad (the first station beyond the Spuyten Duyvel), a splendid view is had of the Hudson, with the villiis clustered along the eastern bank and the Palisades showing their perpendicular fronts against the swelling outlines of the Ramapo Range. The city of Yonkers is seen in the distance, and near at hand are the convent of Mount St. Vincent and the castle- like mansion (belonging to the convent) which was formerly the property of Edwin P'orrest, the tragedian. The scenery in the immediate iieighborhood is made up of undulating hills, sloping gently to the river's range, with innumerable mansions and cottages em- bowered in trees. The settlement of Kiverdale is unique in its way, being a group of handsome resi- dences, the effect of which is unbroken by meaner dwellings or business houses. VIEW OF FOKT WASHINGTON, 188ri3e .\t every tm ii tlie vision breaks upon ; Till to our woniiering and iiiiliTted eyes The liiglilanil roi ks and hills in solemn gramleiir rise. ' It was here that the search was made many years ago forsunken Ireasuresupposed to have been deposited by the noted buccaneer and freebooter. Captain Kidd. Beyond Verplanck's Point, on the east bank, is Peckskill, forty-three miles from New York. It .stands upon a broad bay, at the mouth of a creek, and looks out upon the Dunderberg or Thunder Mountain. It is historically noted a.s the pbice where Edward Pal- mer, a British s|)y, was executed by order of General Putnam. He was hanged from a tree on the village green. The beautiful Highlands rise in their lovely majesty to the northward and westward of the town, and the river, pent up into a narrow channel between their flinty jaws, rusiies onward in impetuous course only to spread out again in the beautiful, jjlacid bay ot JIaverstraw. There is no grander river scenery in the world than at this portiou of the Hudson. Writ- ing of the Highlands, Dr. Mitciiell says,—" This solid barrier of ro(;k, which is sixteen miles wide and extends along both sides of the Hudson to the distance of twenty miles, in ancient days seems to have impeded the course of the water and to have raised a lake high enough to cover all the country to Quaker Hill and the Taghkanic Mountains on the east, and to Shawanguiik and the C'atskillson the west, exteiuling to the Little Falls of the Mohawk, and to the lladley Falls of the Hud- son, but by some convulsion of nature the mountain chain had been broken, and thus the rushing waters found their way to the now New York Bay." Near Peekskiil the territory of Westchester termi- nates at the boundary Hue which sei)arates it from Putnam County. It would be impossible to depict in language the manifold beauties and advantages of its Hudson Riverfront, already lined with beautiful homes and destiued to become, no doubt, in coui-se of time, one of the most densely populated localities in all the world. For nearly fifty miles it presents an unbroken succession of picturesScluiyler, one of the defenses of New York City from approach by way of the Sound. Here the tides from opposite directions meet in the Sound. Opposite City Island, on the northeast side of the point, are the well-known Stei)ping-Stones, a line of rocks projecting from the Long Island shore, wliich become visible at low water. On the highest of them stands the light- house known as " Stepping-Stone Light." On the northeast side of the point lies Locust Island, and on the south are many handsome residences liiiiiiir the western shore of the East River, including the old Livingston place, noted for its beautiful cedar of Lebanon, .said to be the finest in the United States. It is fifty feet in height and its branches extend for a distance of fifty feet. On the road from the Point to Westchester village are many beautiful residences. On the eastern side of Westchester Creek, in Castle Hill Neck, stands the old Wilkins mansion, now a farm- house, in which it is said three Loyalist clergymen, including Dr. Seabury, (afterwards bishop of Connecti- cut), were secreted during the Revolution. 520 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Cornell's Neck, iu the southwest corner of the town, between the Bronx River and Pugsley's Creek, com- mands some beautiful views of East River and the adjacent islands. The noted property known as " De Laucey's Mill " is located about three miles from the mouth of the Bronx and opposite the village of AVest Farms. The township of the latter name — formerly ])art of the borough of Westchester and uotv incorporated with the city of New York — contains many beautiful sites, among them being the former residence of the poet, Joseph Rodmsiu Drake, on Hunt's Point, near its extremity, overlooking the East River and Flushing Bay. Near the entrance of Jef- ferd's Neck is Rose Bank, the beautiful estate of William H. Leggett, on the bank of the East River, which here has the appearance of a lake. In front of the house a view is had of Riker's Island, the Two Brothers, the entrance to Hell Gate, with New York City in the distance. The ancient ^lanor of Mor- risania, also at one time a part of Westchester County, is now a district of New York City. It was originally a favorite resort of the Indians, as is shown by the numerous remains discovered in mounds, etc., and re- mained but sparsely settled for years. In 1848, how- ever, it began to yield to the encroachment of the city's poj)ulation, and, iu course of time, a flourisliing town was built up. It now forms the thickly-popu- lated Twenty-third Ward of New York City. Mott Haven, which occu])ied part of the ancient tract of Morrisania, is the seat of an extensive iron foundry established by Jordan L. Mott. Adjoining it is the Harlem Bridge, atibrding communication with the city proper. In the vicinity of the bridge is the ter- minus of the New Haven and Hudson River Rail- road, with a large depot and dock. On an elevation northeast of the depot stands the manor-house of what at one time was known as " Old Morrisania," with the ancient vault of the Morris family. On the east side of the Mill Brook, at the southwest angle of the old township of Morrisania, stands the country- seat of the noted statesman, (xouverneur Morris. It is eight miles from New York City and nearly o])])()site Hell Gate, commanding a noble view of the surround- ing country and the river. The Mill Brook Valley passes near the old mansion to its junction with the Harlem Kills. It was the scene, during the Revolu- tion, of many daring exploits of Enoch Crosby, the noted spy. About two miles from Harlem Bridge, near the banks of the stream, in the neighborhood of Tremont, lived the celebrated Charlotte Temple. East of the brook and nearly opposite North and South Brother Islands, East River, lies Port Morris, said to be " unsurpassed for the anchorage of large vessels by any port in the world." At one of the docks here the famous " Great Eastern " rode in safety. Just above Port Morris, opposite Riker's Island, there is an admirable site for a navy-yard, with the means at hand for constructing a fresh-water basin to be sup- plied by the Bronx, in which large fleets could be floated. The natural advantages of the locality as a shipping and terminal point are indeed exceptionally fine, and must be greatly enhanced by the completion of the Hell Gate improvement. The town of Pelham, adjoining Westchester on the east, presents a singular variety of outline, due to the incorporation within its boundaries of Hunter's and City Islands, which cause it to project far out into Long Island Sound. It is historically noted as the scene of the nuirder of the famous zealot, Anne Hutchinson, who, fleeing from the stern Puritans of Massachusetts, settled either on Pelham Neck or in the inunediate vicinity. Pelham Neck is now the site of many handsome residences, chief among which for its historical interest is the Bowne dwelling, which itands on the spot once occupied by the manor-house of Thomas Pell, first lord of the Manor of Pelham, from which the township derives its name. A fine view of City Island and the Sound and Pelham Bay is to be obtained from this locality. City Island is .so named from the hopes of the early settlers, inspired by its great advantages of location, that it would one day become the site of a great commercial city. It is a beautiful spot, but its only important industry is a large dock-yard, at which a number of noted yachts have been built. To the eastward lies Hart Island, the site of a city hospital and work-house. Hunter's Island is connected with the main land by a stone causeway ami bridge. From the mansion, about the middle of the island, a noble view is afibrded. New Rochelle, the next township, possesses a double interest on account of its natural beauties and interesting liistorical associations as the site of the ancient Huguenot settlement. In its immediate vi- cinity the waters of the Sound are dotted with numer- ous islands, and in the distance the shores of Long Island present a smiling landscape, varied by cosy villages and jjrosperous looking farm-houses. Nearly opposite the town of New Rochelle is a promontory extending into the entrance to Hempstead Bay, which is known as Kidd's Point, from tlie i)opular supposition that Captain Kidd, the ])irale, buried some of his ill-gotten treasure there. The lands of this portion of the county, as a rule, are level and stony, but the soil is productive and there are hand- some growths of timber on the unimproved tracts. Mamaroneck, adjoining New Rochelle on the east, was a favorite resort of the Indians, who are supposed to have been attracted bj' the renuirkable beauty of the scenery. The Mamaroneck River, which forms the eastern boundary of the town, is a romantic stream, winding through a picturesque and fertile country and forming some charming valleys. The general surface of the township is broken by hills and the scenery is often wild and impressive. The town is well watered by streams and, altogether, presents unusual attractions as a place of residence. Rye, the last of the townships that front on the Sound, has the general characteristics of this portion WESTCHESTER COUNTY AT THE PRESENT DAY. 521 of the country strongly defined. The surface of the shore is broken and rocky, while the interior com- prises fertile ridges and plains. Along the water- front are a number of islands, chief among which is Manussing, on which the first settlements were made. The interior townships of Westchester County are Korth Salem, Lewisboro, Poundridgc, Bedford, North Castle and Harrison in the northern portion ; WhitePlains,Scarsdale and East Chester (with a small water front at the head of Pelham Bay) in the east- ern portion. New Castle west of the centre, and York- town, Somers and North Salem in the western por- tion. Those fronting on the Hudson, beginning at New York City and traveling westward, are Yonkers, Grcenburgh, Mount Pleasant, Ossiningand Cortlandt. The entire face of the county is well watered by a num- ber of streams and lakes and is remarkable for the pic- turesqueness of its scenery in almost every part. It may be said to consist, roughly speaking, of several ridges of hills parallel to the Hudson River, and separated by valleys. These hills constitute two general ranges, one extending along the Hudson and the other along the boundary line between the States of New York an(X» East Chester Town, including Mt. Vernon Village 8737 7491 Mount Vernon Village 4580 2700 Greenburgli Town, including Tarrytown Village . 8934 10,790 Tarrytown Village 3025 Harrison Town 1494 787 Lowisboro jTown 1612 1001 Mamaroneck Town 1863 1483 Mount Pleasant Town, including North Tarrytown Village 5450 5210 North Tarrytown Village 2804 New Castle Town ■ 2297 2152 New Rochelle Town 5276 3915 North Castle Town 1818 1996 North Salem Town 1693 1754 Ossining Town, including Ossining Village . . . 8709 7798 Sing Sing Village 0578 4690 Pelham Town 2540 1790 Poundridge Town 1034 1191 Bye Town, including Port Chester Village . . . . 6576 7150 Port Chester Village 3254 3797 Scarsdale Town 614 517 SomersTown 1630 1721 Westchester Town 6789 6015 White Plains Town, including White Plains Vil'go 4094 2030 White Plains Village 2381 Yonkers City 18,892 18,357 Ward 1 5149 Ward 2 6917 Ward 3 6953 Ward 4 873 Yorktown ■ 2481 2625 There were in Westchester County in 1880, — Native Born 85,278 Foreign Born 23,710 Total 108,988 Of the Foreign-born there were, — From Ireland 14,503 From Germany 6,579 From England and all other countries 2,628 Agricultural Products. — The agricultural re- sources of our county make a very fair showing. While our farms are not, as in some of the Western States, immense territories, yielding fabulous crops, they give evidence of the prosperity of the many, rather than the opulence of a few, — a healthy state of things, indicating the thrift, independence and contentment of the people. Westchester County contains 2991 farms, of which 2385 are cultivated by their owners, 455 are rented for fixed money rentals and 151 are rented for shares of products. Of these farms, 888 have an area of from 50 to 100 acre« ; 909 from 100 to 500 acres ; 17 measure over 500 and under 1000 ; and 3 over 1000 acres. There are only 4 farms under three acres ; 183 are over 3 and under 10 acres ; 290 over 10 and under 20 acres ; and 697 over 20 and under 50 acres. It will be seen from these figures that the majority of our farmers own enough land to raise either profitable crops or live stock. The smaller farms are well adapted for the cultiva- tion of fruits and vegetables and the raising of poul- try, a by no means insignificant feature in our list of productions. The total farming area of the county is 255,774 acres. Of this, 141,583 acres are tilled land, includ- ing fallow and grass in rotation ; 62,265 acres are in permanent meadows, pastures, orchards and vineyards. There are 40,462 acres in woodland and forest, and 11,464 acres in old fields and other unimproved lands. The value of farms, including land, fences and buildings, is set down at $33,264,505. That of farm- ing improvements and machinery at $597,892; of live stock at $1,805,838. The cost of building and repairing ferries, in 1879, was $129,336 ; that of fer- tilizers purchased during the same year, $48,645, The estimated value of all farm productions sold, consumed or on hand, for 1879, was $2,544,041. The live stock of the county and its productions in WESTCHESTER COUNTY AT THE PRESENT DAY. 523 the year 1879 were as follows : Horses, 6919; mules and asses, 40 ; working oxen, 2418; milch cows, 19,168; other cattle, 5302 ; sheep, exclusive of spring lambs, 1646; swine, 8207; wool, spring clip of 1880, 6069 lbs. ; milk sold in 1879, or sent to cheese and butter factories, 5,637,072 gallons ; butter made on farms, 616,825 lbs. ; cheese made on farms 2540 lbs. Cereal productions : Barley, 84 acres produced 2094 bushels; buckwheat, 1101 acres, 13,464 bushels ; In- dian corn, 11,131 acres, 377,357 bushels ; oats, 9004 acres, 238,509 bushels; rye, 4038 acres, 55,130 bush- els ; wheat, 1582 acres, 22.698 bushels. There were also produced in 1879, 300 tons flax-straw and 10 lbs. maple sugar; 63,408 acres of hay were mown, yield- ing 69,221 tons. There were on hand, June 1, 1880, exclusive of spring hatching, 116,782 barn-yard fowls and 7506 other poultry. The number of eggs produced in 1879 was 662,672 dozens ; 13,475 pounds of honey and 363 pounds of wax were gathered in 1879 ; 3 acres cul- tivated in tobacco yielded 1825 pounds; 326,092 bushels Irish potatoes were raised on 3876 acres. The value of orchard products, sold or consumed in the year was $164,196 ; that of garden products, $54,105. There were 19,653 cords of wood cut and the value of forest products sold or consumed during the year was $90,095. Spring wool (1880), 1646 fleeces, weighing 6069 of all pounds ; 100 pounds broom corn, and 82 bush- els dry beans were gathered in 1879. These figures speak highly for the productiveness of our soil and the industry of our farmers. Manufacturing Industries. — Not less inter- esting is the report on the manufacturing interests of the county. While Westchester County stands seventeenth on the list as regards the number of es- tablishments and the amount of capital invested, it will compare favorably with the most important man- ufacturing counties. The true criterion of prosper- ity is not so much the amount of capital and the namber of manufacturers, as the proportion of work- ing people who find employment at fair wages and the margin of profits after all expenses are paid. A comparison of the various factories of our manu- fiacturing interests with those of some other counties liaving a larger number of manufacturing establish- ments will show that Westchester County is particu- larly favored in this respect. The census reports give the number of manufacturing establishments in this county as 502, with an aggregate capital of $5,659,- 424r-an average of $10,841.48 per establishment. The number of hands employed during the year was 10,- 502; to wit: 7,542 men, 2,286 women, and 674 child- ren and youths — an average of nearly 21 hands per establishment. Three million two hundred and thirty-one thou- sand three hundred and sixty-four dollars were dis- tributed as wages among these 10,502— an average of $307.69 per hand. As five-sixteenths of the hands are women and children, who earn much less than the men, the wages of the latter arc considerably above the average. The material consumed was worth $7,762,838. If we add this to the amount paid for wages and we de- duct the total from the gross amount of products, $14,217,985, we have a net balance of $3,223,783, repre- senting nearly 57 per cent, profit on the capital in- vested. Examining other tables, we find that Erie, the largest manufacturing county, has 5,281 establish- ments, with an aggregate capital of $62,719,399, an average of $11,688.57 per establishment. Forty-eight thousand seven hundred and ninety-eight hands find employment, at a cost of $22,867,176 — an average of $468.62 per hand. But Erie has a large number of industries requiring skilled mechanics, such as the manufacturing of agricultural implements, bridge- building, carriage and wagon-building, railroad cars, cooperage, foundry and machine works (which alone employ 2,048 men), ship-building, marble and stove works, tanneries, etc. The mechanics get higher wages, and the average wages of ordinary working- men are thereby much reduced. The product of these 5281 manufacturing establish- ments aggregates the enormous sum of $179,188,685 ; but the material used costs $130,108,417, and this, added to the wages and deducted from the gross toial of products, leaves a profit margin of $26,203,092, or not quite 42 per cent, on the capital invested. Onondaga County with 1277 establishments used a capital of $13,995,627, or $278.75 per hand. The material used cost $12,222,132, and the gross pro- ducts aggregate $20,428,477. After deducting wages and cost of material we have here $4,210,718 for profit margin — not quite 38 per cent, on the capital invested. We give th&se figures with no desire to makeinvid- uous comparisons, but to show that Westchester county, with its 502 establishments and modest work- ing capital, is doing a safer business than most of its wealthier sister counties. The variety of industries is great, as compared to the total number of establishments. They are as fol- lows, the figures showing the number of establish- ments engaged in the industry : Agricultural imple- ments, 1 ; boots and shoes, 11 ; bread and baking pro- ducts, 12 ; brick and tile, 21 ; buttons, 1 ; carpets, 1 ; carriages and wagons, 14 ; cheese and butter factory, 1 ; men's clothing, 7 ; combs, 1 ; cooperage, 1 ; files, 2; flouring and grist-mill products, 24; foundry and machine-shop products, 24; men's furnishing good.s, 1 ; gas and lamp fixtures, 2; curried leather, 1 ; malt liquors, 4 ; planed lumber, 2 ; sawed lumber, 13 ; marble and stone work, 8 ; musical instruments, 1 ; floor oil-cloth, 1 ; patent medicines, 1 ; steel pens, 1 ; pickles, preserves and sauces, 5; printing and pub- lishing, 5 ; rubber and elastic goods, 1 ; saddlery and 524 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. harness, 19 ; sash, and doors, 9 ; scales and balances, 1 ; ship building, 9; shirts, 5; silk and silk goods, 8 ; slaughtering and packing, 2 ; soap and candles, 2 ; spectacles and eye-glasses, 1 ; sugar and molasses refinery, 1 ; tinware, copperware and sheet-iron ware, 23 ; tobaccO) cigars and cigarettes, 13 ; wire, 1 ; wool hats, 3. Among the liiost important industries is that of foundry aiid machine-shop products in which the capital invested is $1,067,400. It is represented by 24 establishments, and gives employment to 2190 men whose average wages, however, are only ;?244.83. The material used amounts to $1,130,382, and the products to $2,814,036i The margin of profits is $647,464. The manufacture of carpets is one of the best pay- ing industries. A single establishmeut, with a capital of $800,000 (the largest invested by any one firm), manufactures $2,646,946 worth of goods, using $1,313,634 of material, and paying $600,000 wages to 1606 hands-^an average of $378.66 per hand. This establishment employs the largest number of women —1000, 506 men and 100 children. The highest average of wages is paid by the eye- glasses and spectacle manufacturers, $525.77 ; they employ 90 men, 6 w^omen and 1 child. The printers and publishers payj on an average $495 per hand ; the scales and balances manufacturer.-*, $487.50, and the ship-builders a little over $500 ; but these indus- tries employ only men and these in limited num- ber. The worst paid bread-winners are the shirt makers. The five firms engaged in this business give employ- ment to 15 men, 477 women and 4 children, at average wages of $142.23. Total amount of wages $70,550 ; material used, .$335,600; gross receipts, $477,750. Profit margin, $71,600, on a working capital of $49,000. One steel pen manufacturer with a capital of $22,- 500, employs 5 men and 45 women, on average wages of $200. Aggregate of wages and material, $13,450. Gross products, $24,000. The manufacture of boots and shoes is another im- portant industry, giving employment to 673 men, 180 women and 36 children, whose average wages are $291.29. The capital invested in this business is $333,600, the material used cost costs $865,544, and the amount of products is $1,235,644. Eleven estab- lishments are engaged in this business. Eight firms are engaged in marble and stone work. Most of the granite works in the country are suited for rough work only, and the stone is quarried for local use. A coarse-grained gneiss, striped alternately light and dark, which is quarried near Hastings, is extensively used in New York City for general con- struction purposes. The Tuckahoe marble is quarried at several points. The following interesting account of the belts of Dolomite of Archiean age in which these quarries are, is taken from " Notes by Professors Cook and Smock," published in the census reports (vol. X.) " One of these belts reaches New York Island, crossing the Harlem River at King's Bridge; another crops on the Sound near Rochelle; others strike the river at Hastings, Dobb's Ferry, Sing Sing and other points, and furnish stones good for construction pur- poses and of varied colors. The best marble obtained from these deposits are those of Tuckahoe and Pleas- antville. The first is white, rather coarse in texture and regular in quality, and the better grades have been used for some of the finest buildings in the City of New York, notably St. Patrick's Cathedral. The color changes to light gray by exposure. " At the quarry of the Tuckahoe Marble Company the finest grade is nearly a pure white, but this is available only in small quantities, and is used for monumental and ornamental work. In Mr. John F. Masterdon's quarry this same material is quarried more extensively. " In composition the stone from these quarries is a Dolomite, containing a small amount of iron and some mica. The buildings constructed of the stone from the Tuckahoe Marble Company's quarry are those of the New York Stock Exchange, New York City, and the Mutual Life Insurance Company, at Boston. Those constructed of the material from Mr. Masterdon's quarry are the New York Life Insurance building, New York City, the City Hall, Brooklyn, N. Y., and the Hotel Vendome, Boston. " At Pleasantville, a few miles north of the Tucka- hoe quarries, a coarse, crystalline white marble oc- curs; formerly this was quite extensively quarried for building purposes. The front of the Union Dime Savings Bank building, in New York City, is built of this stone. Its structure being quite coarse, it is not well adapted for carved work. It has also been found to break easily, especially when used for long columns, and it would not be a safe stone on this account for all kinds of work. The stone is remarkable for its crystalline, the crystals being unusually large and con- spicuous, and from this peculiar appearance it has received the name of ' snow flake ' marble. This quarry has recently [1880] been furnishing about twenty-five tons of stone per day lor making soda water." Finances. — -The valuation and taxation of the county in 1880 were as follows : V;ilue of re.al estate, S5-2,09.'),188 ; of personal property, $3,.W9,G58. Sliite tax: schools, $7:^,.')4.'') ; other piiiposes, $I22,U01. County tax for other pui-iioses than schools, 3278,821. Tax in the school districts, S204, 7M; in minor civil divisions, $626,62:3. Grand total of taxes paid $1. 306,626. The gross indebtedness of the county in 1880 was 82,071,757 ; divided as follows: bonded debt, S2,967,.'>.36 ; floating debt, 814,221. The sinking fund of S.'i,647 (belonging to i'eekskill) reduced the total to $2,9r)(i,ll(i net. This amount is subdivided as follows : county debt, $:520,()(X) ; towii- shij) debt, $1,083,278. School district debt, S931. City and town debts 81,554,258 bonded, and 813,290 floating debt, less 85,647 sinking fund. Net debt, $1,561,901. WESTCHESTER COUNTY AT THE PRESENT DAY. The city aiiU town debt is divided as follows : Yonkors takes the lead witli a bonded debt of $1,3S9,IK)(1 ; the purpose for wliich bonds arc issued being, — For bridges ?22,()fl0 I'ublic buildings 12,000 Kefuudiug old debt 730,OI)() Water works 62'),0(10 Total $l,38a,ii'0. Sing Sing had a floating debt of . . . 857G I'eckskill, bonded debt fl35,208 Less sinking fund 5,r>47 129,.'i61 Port Chester, floating debt lll.UOO White Plains, bonded 823,300 Floating 1,000 24,000 Mount Vornou, bonded 86,".5i) Floating 1,111 7,SG4 The finaucial report of the mayor of Yonkersfor the fiscal year end- ing March 1, 1885, shows the condition of the bonded debt to be as fol- lows: Consolidatiou bomls, amount outstanding So25,noo Water " " " 745,000 Bridge " " " .... 14,000 Public Building and Dock " " 30,000 Total amount outstanding March 1 $1,314,000 There was paid during the previous year 825,000 on consolidation and fS.tKX) on bridge bonds. Water bonds were issued to the amount of 115,000. The county treasurer's report for the quarter euiling January 31, 1886, shows the disbursements during the quarter to have been SCO,- 019.76, and the balance on hand, February 1, $40,258.19. The total amount paid on account of the county in- debtedness during the year, as shown by reports, was twenty-one thousand two hundred and sixty-nine dollars. Education. — The people of our county manifest a constant interest in educational affairs and the con- dition of our schools is such as we may justly be proud of. There has been for many years a steady improvement in the character of school buildings and the methods of teaching have been as steadily per- fecting themselves. The teachers' institutes held yearly are of indisputable benefit and their effects are already felt in the schools. At the spring holding of the institute, at New Rochelle, May, 1885, seventy-one per cent, of the whole number of teachers were in attendance. The school commissioners' report for 1885-86 shows in the three school commissioners' districts of our county the following : The Duuiberof teachers in the couuty is 334, apportioned by districts u follows : let Commissioners' District C6 2d " " 138 3d '■ " ... 130 The total number of pupils of school age in the county was 30^647, as follows : 1st Commissioners' District 0,767 2d " " 12,884 3d " " 10,!l9ii The average attendance in the county was 9,440, di Tided as follows : Ist Commissionei's' Distnct , 2d " " 4,110 3d •' " 3,453 525 The School Commissioners are for the,— l.st Di.'trict Jared Sauford 2d " James B, Lockwood 3d " John \V. Wttel, Peekskill The citj' of Yonkers being a separate commissioners district, is accordingly not included in the above cal- culation. The number of children of school age residing in the district of Yonkers, at the beginning of 1885, was seven thousand three hundred and sixty-two ; of these one thoiLsand five hundred and thirty-nine attended private schools and two thousand nine hundred and forty-eight the public schools. Yonkers has thirteen private .schools and seven public school buildings; one of which is built of frame and six of brick. In the couiitj'^ towns there are forty-six private schools, with a total membership of four thousand and thirteen pupils. Of the one hundred and fifty-four school buildings in the county at the present time (1885) one hundred and twenty-two are built of frame, twenty-eight of brick and four of stone. The county school libraries contain twenty-seven thousand two hundred and twenty-one volumes, val- ued at nineteen thousand one hundred and twenty- four dollars. The Yonkers library, three thousand one hundred and fifty volumes, valued at thirty -eight hundred dollars.' According to the annual report of the State Super- intendent of Public Instruction for 1886 Westchester County has ninety-one children over five and under twenty one years of age, for each qualified teacher; forty-eight children attending school any portion of the year for each qualified teacher; twenty-eight children the average daily attendance for each teach- er; 30.76 per cent, of average daily attendance on whole number of children between five and twenty-one years of age, and 58.33 per cent, of average daily at- tendance on whole number of children attending school any portion of the year. The Yonkers report shows one hundred and seventy- two children of school age for each qualified teacher; sixty-one the whole number of children attending school any portion of the year, for each qualified teacher ; thirty-seven the average daily attendance per teacher; 21.51 the per cent, of average daily at- tendance on the whole number of children of school age, and 60.65 the per cent, of average daily attend- ance on the whole number of children attending school any portion of the year. 1 The number of school buildings and books has increased since this report. 526 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. CHAPTER XL THE BENCH AND BAR.* BY HON. ISAAC N. MILLS, Judge of the County Court. Preparatory to writing this chapter we have carefully examined the court records, in the county clerk's office at White Plains, from the earliest times . perused the fragments of history, here and there ex- tant, bearing upon the subject, and such biograph- ical sketches of judges and lawyers as can be found : and also received from the lips of some of the veteran members of the bar and old residents of the county a mass of traditionary information, giving the names, characteristics and relative standing of the leading members of the bar for nearly a century past, and abounding in interesting reminiscences and anecdotes, the publication of which the limits of this chapter do not permit. Westchester County has had an established bench for about two hundred years, and an established bar for nearly, if not quite, that length of time. A period 80 long could not fail to prove a rich field for histori- cal investigation. While, in the main, the materials in hand are abundant, still, in some cases, it has seemed impossible to recover from oblivion the biog- raphy of one who, from the frequent appearance of his name upon the records of the court, we should judge to have been in his time a leading counselor and advocate. With this mass of materials before us, it is no easy task to write a chapter upon the bench and bar of Westchester County ; it would be much easier to write a volume. Under the scheme of this work, however, many of the leading judges and lawyers are treated of at length elsewhere, in separate biographies, or in con- nection with the history of the several towns where they resided and whose names they have honored by their lives and work. As to the living judges and lawyers, we shall under- take merely to give their names and residences, and leave to the future historian the presentation of their characteristics and careers when their life-work shall be complete. The history of the bench of Westchester County begins in the year 1688, when John Pell was ap- pointed the first judge of the county. On pages 11 and 12, liber B of deeds, in the office of the register of the county, his commission is stated in the following words : "James the Second, by the grace of God, King of England, Scot- land, France, Ireland, &c., to all to whom these presents shall come, 'Many Interesting facts relating to the history of the bench and bur in Westchester County may bo found in this volume in the chapter on the Civil History, prepared by the Kev. William J. Gumming, of York- town. greeting : know ye that we have assigned, constituted and aiipciiud d, and by those presents do assign, constitute and appoint, our trusty and well beloved 8ub.ject, John Pell, Esq., to be judge of our inferior Court of Common Pleas, to be holden in our county of Westchester, in our ti rritory and dominion of New England, with authority to use and ex- ercise all power and jurisdiction belonging to said court and to do that which to ju.stice doth appertain, according to the laws, customs and stat- utes of our kingdom of England, and this, our territory and dominion, and the said John Fell, assisted with two or more justices of the peace in our said county, to hear, try and determine all causes and matters civil by law cognizable in the said county, and to award execution thereon. Accordingly, in testimony whereof we have caused the great seal of our said territory to be hereunto atBxed. Witness, Sir EJmuu d Andros, Knt., our Captain-generall and Governor-in-Chief of our terr i- tory and dominion aforesaid, this 25th day of August, in the fourth year of our reign, A. D. 1688." We have given elsewhere a very full account of the Pell family, in connection with the founding of Pelham. The first Court of Sessions, shown by the court records, was held on the 3d of June, 1684, the next year after the county was established. The rec- ord does not show who presided, or who sat as associ- ate judges. We have not been able to learn from any source the name of the presiding judge. It is pos- sible, therefore, that some one may have been ap- pointed, or acted, as judge of the county before Judge Pell; or it may be that he had been ap- pointed and acted prior to the appointment above detailed. Caleb Heathcote was the next judge of the Court of Common Pleas, holding that office from a.d. 1693 to 1720. He was the sixth son of Gilbert Heathcote, of Chesterfield, England, who had fought with distinction in the Parliament army during the civil war which cost Charles the First his head. The Heathcotes were an ancient and honorable family of Derbyshire. They are mentioned as engaged in mer- cantile pursuits at Chesterfield during the reign of Edward IV. (1470-1471 ).'^ A romantic story is told of the cause of Caleb Heathcote's emigration to America. He was engaged to a very beautiful young lady, who jilted him for his elder brother, Sir Gilbert Heathcote (afterwards M. P. for London and Lord Mayor of that city in 1711). Caleb came to New York in 1692. " From the time of his arrival he became a leading man in the colony," and being possessed of great wealth, which he had acquired in mercantile pursuits, he made extensive purchases of lands in Westchester County. These, on the 21st of March, 1701, were "erected into the lordship and manor of Scarsdale, to be holden of the King in free and common soccage, its Lord yielding and rendering therefore annually, upon the festival of Nativity, five pounds current money of New York, etc." Besides his judgeship, Mr. Heathcote held other offices of honor in the province. He was colonel of the Westchester militia all his life, "first mayor of the borough of Westchester, a councilor and survey- or-general of the province, mayor of New York for three years, for a time commander of the colony's 2 MS. book of Sir William Heathcote, f|UOted by Bolton. THE BENCH AND BAR. 527 forces, and from 1715 to his death, in 1721, receiver- general of the customs of all North America-" ' A sincere churchman, he was senior warden of Westchester Parish from 16C5 to 17C2, and senior warden of the parish of Rye frcm 1703 to 1710.^ William Willett, who succeeded Colonel Heathcote as judge of the Court of Common Pleas of the county in 1721, was the son of Colonel Thomas Willett, of Flushing, Long Island, and the grandson of Honor- able Thomas Willett, first mayor of New York. The Willetts descend from the Rev. Thcmas Willett, a distinguished English divine, who died in 1597. The descendants of Honorable Thomas Willett occui)ied prominent positions in the province, such as high sherifl's, judges and mayors. Frederick Phillips was judge of the Court of Com- mon Pleas from 1732 to 1734. His full history is given in connection with Yonkers, where his resi- dence was located, and ako in the history of Green- burgh. Israel Honeywell, one of the earliest settlers of the town of Westchester, where he had a number of local office!-, was judge of the same court from 1734 to 1737, and again from 1740 to 1743. Samuel Purdy, of Rye, was also judge of that court in 1734-37, and again from 1740 to 1752. John Thomas was judge of the Court of Common Pleas in 1737-39, and again from 1765 to 1776. Judge Thomas was the son of the Rev. John Thomas, a mis- sionary of the Honorable Propagation Society at Philadelphia, and first rector of St. George's Church, Hempstead, L. I., in 1704.' Judge Thomas was the most prominent personage in Rye. He espoused the patriotic side in the Revolution, and his influence was greatly felt in its behalf. In 1777 a party of British troops, making oneof their frequent raids into the interior of the county, seized Judge Thomas at his house in " Rye Woods." He was particularly obnoxious to the British, who had long been seeking to effect his capture. He was taken to New York and cast in a prison, where he died soon after. He was buried in Trinity Church-yard.* John Ward, one of the judges of the Common Pleas in 1737-39 and 1752-54, was from East Chester. He died in 1754. Probably a relative of Hon. Stephen Ward. Lewis Morris, Jr., of Morrisania, sat on the* bench of that court in 1738-39. A notice of him will be found in the history of Morrisania. William Leggett, of West Farms (then part of the town of Westchester), was judge of the same court in 1762-54. He was the third son of Gabriel Leggett, of Essex County, England, who " emigrated to this >"Doc. Hist, of New York." * Button's "History of Westctiestcr County." See also Edward F. de lancey's cliapter on tlio "Manors of Westchester County," in tliis Tolnme, and his sketcli of Maniaroneck. •Bolton's "History of We.itcUcstor," vol. ii., Apiwndi.'i A, ^Buird's "History of Rye." country in 1661, and in right of his wife, Elizabeth Richardson, daughter and co-heiress of John Rich- ardson (one of the joint partners), became possessed of a large portion of the [Planting] Neck." Judge Leggett was mayor of the borough of Westchester, A.I). 1734. Nathaniel Underbill, judge from 1755 to 1774, was the great-grandson of the " redoubtable " Ctiptain John Underbill, a soldier under the illustrious Maurice of Nassau, Prince of Orange, in the Low Countries, who came to New England in 1630, and attained such dis- tinction there that he was api)ointed one of the first deputies from Boston to the General Court, and one of the earliest officers of the Ancient and Honorable Artillery.^ Nathaniel Underbill was elected mayor of the borough of Westchester in 1775. He filled various other offices and died in 1784. Jonathan Fowler was judge in 1769-71 and 1773-75. No positive data are to be found concerning this per- sonage. In all likelihood he was the son of Caleb Fowler, county judge during the intervening year 1772 and until 1776. Caleb Fowler was a resident of the West Patent of North Castle, where he owned a good deal of property. He was surrogate in 1761-66. His son Jonathan (one of the twelve children) was appointed one of the executors of his will, which in- strument, dated in the year 1760, was ofi'ered for pro- bate September 14, 1784. The persons already men- tioned appear by the court records to have been the presiding judges of the County Court of Common Pleas during the colonial period and at the times re- spectively given. The list differs somewhat from that given in the New York Civil List or in Bolton's His- tory, but is believed to be substantially correct. From May, 1776, until May, 1778, the Court of Common Pleas held no session in Westchester County. After the latter date there was a principal or "first" judge, as he was called, in this court, and a number of associate judges. Sometimes there was as many as five associate judges at one time. Robert Graham, of White Plains, was the first to fill this oflice of " first "judge. A biographical notice of this distinguished man is given elsewhere. Stephen Ward, of East Chester, appointed in 1784, was for many years " first " judge of the County Court of Common Pleas. " He was the son of Ed- mund Ward, of East Chester, for a long time a mem- ber of the Colonial Assembly, and grandson of Ed- mund Ward, of Fairfield, Conn., who removed to East Chester about the latter period of the seven- teenth century." Hon. Stephen Ward was an ardent patriot, and was proscribed at an early period of the Revolution by the Loyalist party and a price set upon his head. " Ward's house " was the scene of several engagements between the Americans and the British, and was finally burned down by the latter in 1778. Ebenezer Lockwood, of Poundridge, was the next s Algerine Captive, by D. Updike Ifndi'rliill, fiuolcd by Bolton. 528 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " first " judge, 1791-94. Judge Lockwood was known as " Major " Lockwood through the Revolutionary War, he having been a major in the regiment of Westchester County Militia, commanded by Colonel Thomas Thomas, and engaged in active service dur- ing most of the campaign of 1776. From 1776 to 1783 he filled several public offices. He was a member of the Provincial Congress, member of the Committee of Safety, member of the Provincial Convention for forming a Constitution of Government for the State, and was returned a member of the Legislature for several years after the close of the war. Judge Lockwood was born in Stamford, Conn., and was the fourth son of Joseph Lockwood, who emi- grated to Poundridge in 1743. Jonathan G. Tompkins, of Scarsdale, father of Vice- President Daniel D. Tompkins, was first judge from 1794 to 1797. " He was a member of the State Con- vention which adopted the Declaration of Independ- ence and the first Constitution of the State. He was elected to the Legislature and remained in that capacity during the whole period of the Revolution, and on the institution of the University was ap- pointed one of the regents, which situation he held until his resignation of it, in 1808." ' Judge Tompkins was the son of Stephen Tompkins, whose ancestors emigrated originally from the north of England and landed at Plymouth, Mass. Jonathan was adopted by Jonathan Griffin, from whom he re- ceived bis middle name, Griffin. Judge Tompkins died in 1823, aged eighty-seven years. Ebenezer Purdy, of North Salem, sat on the county bench 1797-1802 (the Purdys are numerous and the only Ebenezer we find among them is put down by Bolton as the son of Abraham Purdy, of Yonkers ; born 1754.) John Watts, who was " first judge " of Court of Common Pleas in Westchester County from 1802 to 1807, was born in New York, of which city his father (also named John) was a prominent citizen and a member of the King's Council. Judge Watts received a legal education and was eminently qualified for the bench. At twenty-five years of age he was appointed royal recorder of the city of New York, 1774. and was the last to hold the position. From 1791 to 1794 he was Speaker of the Assembly of New York, and after- wards he became a member of Congress. His home was at No. 3 Broadway, New York. He was one of the wealthiest men in New York City, and owned much property not only there, but also throughout the State. He had a fine residence in Westchester County, near the village of New Rochelle, on a slope overlooking Hunter's Island, and there lived in very good style- In person, he was remarkably fine- looking. He married Jane, daughter of Peter De Lancey, of "The Mills," in the town of Westchester. In Mr. Watts' character, equanimity was the most noticeable trait. As a writer and speaker, he possessed much conciseness of expression, and Samuel B. Ruggles once said of him, that "John Watts could express more on a page of note paper than most men could on a sheet of foolscap." Mr. Watts died Sep- tember 3, 1836, being then within three days of eighty- seven years of age. Of his family of eight or nine children, but one survived him, and that one was childless. He had three grandchildren, however, one of whom, John Watts De Peyster, now living in New York, was his chief legatee. Mr. AVatts was the founder and endower of the Leeke and Watts Orphan House, corner One Hundred and Tenth Street and Ninth Avenue, New York. Caleb Tompkins, son of Jonathan G. Tompkins, of Scarsdale, and eldest brother of Vice-President Daniel D. Tompkins, was first judge of the County Court of Common Pleas from 1808 to 1820, and again from 1823 to 1846. He died January 1, 1846, aged eighty-six years and nine days. He was buried at White Plains. Mr. Tompkins was a learned jurist and a man of great abilities. He possessed, in an eminent degree, the gifts and virtues for which the Tompkins family has ever been noted. Nehemiah Brown,'-* who served two terms as county judge, was of the ancient family of Brownes of Rye and of Hastings, England, and a lineal descendant of Peter Brown, whose name is inscribed on the Pil- grim's Monument at Plymouth, Mass. He was born at Rye, Westchester County, Novem- ber 29, 1775, and until his death, on November 1, 1855, occupied the lands on which he was born, and which had been held by his family since the first set- tlement of the town. Few men were better known in his county or held in higher esteem. Of sound judgment, inflexible integrity, withal genial and given to hospitality, his counsel was widely sought and val- ued. He received a captain's commission in the War of 1812, but, as far as is now remembered, was not en- gaged in the field, being detailed to assist in the for- tifications of Throgg's Neck and other points in the vicinity of New York. He served as a member of the Legislature in 1824, and two terms as county judge, occupying the bench with Judges William Jay, Con- stant and others. A righteous man and beloved, he left a rich heritage of memories to his family and friends'. Judge Brown's first wife was Mary, daughter of Major Seymour, of Greenwich, Conn. The second was Pamelia, daughter of Dr. Clark Sanford, of Petersburg, Va. The third and surviving wife was j Abby Jane, daughter of David Brown, of Rye. His ' only children were by his second wife, viz. : Sanford C. Brown, a young man of exceeding promise, who, although dying at the age of twenty-eight years, from exposure in Asia Minor, on business for his firm, waa[l a prominent director and member of the Stamfon • Bultun'ii " History of Wcstchoster." - This sketch was prupurcd aud iuserted by the editur. 4 THE BENCH AND BAR. 529 Manufacturing Company, and universally popular in business and social circles ; Mary P., wife of Samuel K. Satterlee, of Rye; and Anna Evelyn, wife of Dr. Arthur F. Bissell, of New York City. William Jay,' second son of the Hon. John Jay, filled the intervening term between Judge Tompkins' two terms — that is, from 1821) to 1823. Judge Jay was born at New York June 1789. His early educa- tion, which was conducted under the care of his father, was finished at Yale College, where he gradu- ated in 1808. Adopting the profession of the law, he speedily became jjrominent in its practice, and in 1818 was ajipointed by Governor Tompkins judge of the County Court of Westchester. This office he beld with honor to himself, and to the credit of the community of wliicli he formed a part, until 1842 when he was relieved from the j)osition by Governor Bouck, in compliance witli tlie demand of that portion of the Democratic party whose sympathies were with the South and slavery, and on account of his plainly expressed views in favor of Abolition. From his earli- est years he seemed destined to be a life-long defender of the right and a stern opponent of wrong, in whatever shape they appeared. As early as 1815 he was the means of organizing a temperance society, one of the first in the country, which, at the time, seemed likely to be overwhelmed with intemperance and its accom- panying evils. He was one of the founders of the American I?il)le Society, and till the close of his life was one of the ablest and most devoted supporters of the institution, which has printed the word of God in almost every known language, and distributed it freely in every clime. When the evils of slavery began to be one of the Tital questions of the time, the cause of human free- dom found in Judge Jay an enthusiastic advocate. In 182() there was living in this county a freeman of color named Horton. Going to the city of Washing- ton, he was there arrested as a fugitive slave and advertised for sale, to pay the expenses of his arrest and imprisonment. Providentially, a copy of the newspaper containing the advertisement came into the hands of Judge Jay, and he made ajiplicatiou to Governor De Witt Clinton to demand his release as a free citizen of the State of New York. This was one of the first events in the history of the great struggle against slavery, which ended only when battle-fields had been stained with the blood of its supporters. Throughout this long contest Judge Jay Avas ever active with tongue and pen in behalf of liberty. In 1835 an effort was made by the slavery power, through I'resident Jackson, to prevent the circula- tion of Abolitionist documents by means of the United States mails. This effort, so repugnant to the principles upon which our government was founded, was met by the American Anti-Slavery Society with a dignified and earnest reply, which was written by ' Tbis sketch was prepared and inserted by tlie editor. to Judge Jay, and was one of his ablest efforts. When the Legislature seemed about to pass laws intended to crush the efforts of the Abolitionists, by prohibit- ing the publication and circulation of Anti-Slavery documents, he charged the grand jury of the county that any laws tending to prevent freedom of speech or of the press were null and void. The official mani- festo of the American Anti-Slavery Society was also written by him, and was signed by men whose names are now famous in history. After being relieved from the office of judge he went to Europe, extended his travels to Egypt, and made a careful examination of the institution of slavery as it existed there. A firm believer that the time would come when men should " beat their swords into plow- shares," and " learn war no more," he became presi- dent of the American Peace Society, and published a work, " War and Peace — the evils of the first, with plans of preserving the last." This book led to the famous protocol adopted by the Congress of Paris after the Crimean War, the first united international effort to have arbitration take the place of war. In 1833 he published the life and writings of liis father, the chief justice. Judge Jay was an able writer and possessed reason- ing powers of the highest order. The works which he published were forty-three in number, and to analyze them would require a volume. It is sufficient to say that all, without exception, were devoted to the ele- vation of society, by the removal of the evils which retard its progress. His useful and eventful life ended October 14, 1858. This event caused heartfelt grief among all who realized the value of the friend of humanity. The various societies of which he was a member paid tributes of respect to his memory, and Frederick Douglas, as the fit representative of the race for whose freedom he had labored so long and so well, delivered an eloquent and fitting eulogy. It was his fortune, like that of many others who have labored in a noble cause, not to be permitted to see the result of his labors. The end of slavery, for which he toiled so long, came not till years after he had passed away, and was accomplished by means of whicli he never dreamed. But of all the names that grace the list of the friends of humanity and freedom, none deserves a higher place than that of William Jay. His portrait is placed over the bench in the county court-house at White Plains, in grateful and appro- priate recognition of the illustrious position which the name of Jay holds in the annals of Westchester jurisprudence. After Judge William Jay left the bench, in 1823, Judge Caleb Tompkins was re-ap- pointed to the position of first judge, which he held up to 184(), when he died. George Case, of New Rochelle, a side-judge of the Common Pleas and General Sessions of the county, during the last two years of Judge Tompkins' life, often presided as first judge in his absence. It is said that 530 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Mr. Case came from New York City and began to practice in Westchester County in 1834. He resided at New Rochelle and died there in 1863. He had the reputation of being somewhat arbitrary in his actions while judge, and was not regarded as an eminently learned jurist, but was respected by all as a man of entire integrity. He was a widower when he came to New Rochelle, and had a daughter, who died before him. He had a considerable fortune. Robert S. Hart, now living (1886) at Bedford, was, in 1846, appointed to succeed Judge Tompkins. He was nominated by Governor Silas Wright and unani- mously confirmed by the Senate. Judge Hart is still in vigorous health and active practice, and in years of practice is the senior member of the Westchester bar. He was the last of the judges appointed. His successor, Albert Lockwood, of Sing Sing, was elected under the Constitution of 1846 as county judge, and those who have occupied the position since have been elected. Mr. Lockwood proved to be a very success- ful judge, and gained a most enviable reputation, especially for judicial fairness. John W. Mills, of White Plains, succeeded Mr. Lockwood on the bench in 1851. He had studied law under J. Warren Tompkins, and before being ad- mitted to the bar became deputy county clerk, De- cember 30, 1836. He was admitted to practice in 1837, was appointed master in Chancery in 1844, and an examiner in Chancery in 1846. He was county judge from 1851 to 1855, surrogate from 1862 to 1870, and was supervisor of White Plains several times. He was at one time associated in the practice of his profession with J. Warren Tompkins, subsequently with John J. Clapp, and afterwards with Robert Cochran. Later still he was the senior member of the law-firm of Mills, Cochran & Verplanck. After the dissolution of the firm he attended to private business only. Mr. Mills died suddenly, September 25, 1882, of apoplexy, in the seventy-third year of his age. At one time he had a very large and lucrative practice, perhaps the largest, of the members of the Westchester bar at that time. Judge William H. Robertson' who succeeded Judge Mills in 1855, is a son of Henry Robertson, of whom a brief sketch appears in another part of this work. He was born at the family homestead in Bedford, October 10, 1823. His boyhood was spent on his father's farm, and his early education was obtained at the district schools and at Union Academy, in Bed- ford, of which Alexander G. Reynolds was principal. He taught school for a considerable time in Bedford and Lewisboro. He read law in the office of Judge Robert S. Hart, in Bedford village, was admitted to the bar in 1847, and in 1854 formed a partnership with Odle Close for the practice of law in White Plains, under the finn-name of Close & Robertson, which has continued till the present time. Before 1 This sketch was prepai-ed and insei-ted by the editor of this work. attaining his majority his taste for politics developed itself and he took a warm interest in the Harrison campaign of 1840. His first vote was cast for Henry Clay in the fall of 1844. The next spring he was elected town superintendent of schools, and continued in that position for several years. He has been four times supervisor of Bedford and twice chairman of the Board of Supervisors. His legislative career be- gan in 1848, when he was elected to the Assembly, and he was re-elected the following year. In 1853 he was chosen to the State Senate, where he at once took a prominent position. Among other public acts, he introduced the bill for establishing the Depart- ment of Public Instruction, which may justly be con- sidered one of the most important events in the edu- cational history of the State. In the Assembly of 1849, and also in the Senate of 1855, he supported Hon. W. H. Seward for United States Senator. Only one other person, Reuben Wells, of Warren, voted.;- twice for Mr. Seward for that office. In 1855 Mr. Robertson was elected county judge of Westchester County, and was twice re-elected to that responsible position, thus holding it for twelve years, and dis- charged the duties of the office with such ability and fairness as to win the commendation of the members of the bar, and merit the respect of all classes of citizens. He served six years as inspector of the Seventh Brigade New York State Militia, was chairman of the military committee appointed by Governor Morgan in 1862 to raise and organize State troops in the Eighth Senate District, and was commissioned to superintend the draft in Westchester County. In 1860 he was a member of the Electoral College, and voted for Abraham Lincoln. He supported him again in the National Convention of 1864, and during his whole administration was one of his most loyal and faithful adherents. In 1866 he was elected a representative in 'the Fortieth Congress by a majority of two thousand two hundred over William Radford, who had represented the district for the two terms immediately preceding. While member of Congress he voted for the impeachment of President Johnson, took an active part in the legislation which led to the restoration of the Southern States to the Unioi|> and throughout his term devoted himself to the in- terests of his district and his constituents. Judge Robertson's second term of service in the State Senate began in 1872 and continued without interruption for ten years,during the last eight of which he was president pro tern, of that body. He served as chairman of the Committees on Commerce and Navigation, Rules, Literature and Judiciary. As the head of the Judiciary Committee for eight years, he occupied a position of great responsibility and useful- ness, and it is freely conceded by all who are capable of judging, that it is due to his ability and watchful- ness that many unwise and improper bills were pre- vented from becoming laws. As a Senator be par- I THE BENCH AND BAR. 531 ticipated in six State trials — those of Judges Barnard, McCunn, Curtis aud Priudle, Superintendent De Witt C. Ellis, of the Bank Department, and Superin- tendent John F. Smythe, of the Insurance Depart- ment In 1876 Mr. Kobertson was one of three gentlemen of this State who, at the request of the President, visited Florida to supervise the counting of the votes for the office of President. In 1872 the personal and political friends of Mr. Robertson throughout the State made a vigorous eflPort to place him in nomination for the Governor- ship, and with excellent prospects of success, until the assembling of the convention, when the name of the honored soldier and statesman, General John A. Dix, was presented, and he was chosen to head the ticket. Again, in 1879, Judge Robertson had a strong support for the nomination, but owing to the opposi- tion of what was known as the " machine" influence in the party, he was defeated. In February, 1880, Mr. Robertson was appointed a delegate to represent the State in the National Con- vention to be held in Chicago in June. A vote was passed at the State Convention, instructing its dele- gates to vote as a unit, the purpose being to enable the majority of the delegates to carry it en masse for General Grant. Mr. Robertson had been in Congress with Mr. Blaine, was his warm admirer and personal friend, and believed him to be the favorite of the Republicans of Westchester for the Presidential nom- ination. Soon after the State Convention he pub- lished a letter in the Albany Journal, in which he repudiated theprinciple of the unit rule, and declared for Mr. Blaine. The letter attracted attention throughout the country and gave its author great prominence in the opposition to the " third term movement." It is generally conceded that it was his leadership and organizing ability, more than that of any other man, that broke the power of the " unit rule " in Republican conventions, and defeated the "third term" candidate. In March, 1881, Mr. Robertson was nominated by President Garfield for collector of the port of New York. His political acts having been distasteful to the Senators from this State, they demanded the withdrawal of his nomination by the President. This being refused, a bitter contest followed, which was ended by the resignation of the Senators in May, and the confirmation of Mr. Robertson soon afterward. He did not, however, assume the collectorship until the 1st of August, as the Legislature (he being in the Senate) did not adjourn till late in July. His judicial and legislative experience had prepared him for the most difficult duly of the position, the consid- eration aud decision of intricate points of revenue law, and he discharged its obligations to the satisfac- tion of the importers, and with the almost universal commendation of the public press. Mr. Robertson has been conspicuous and influ- ential in local and State Conventions for many years, took an active part in the National Conventions of 1864, 1876, 1880 and 1884, and was for fifteen years a member of the Republican State Committee. In his political life he has been remarkably successful, hav- ing never been defeated when a candidate before the people, although his principal canvasses have been made in a district of which the party majority was against him. He has achieved this result by the strength of his personal character, his fidelity to friends, his uniform and sincere courtesy, his unques- tioned integrity and his legal and business ability. He possesses in an unusual degree " the genius of common sense," an acute knowledge of human nature and thorough self-control. He is of literary tastes and studious habits, and values no less than his political honors the degree of LL.D., which was conferred on him by Williams College in 1876. In 1865 Mr. Robertson married Miss Mary E. Ballard, daughter of Hon. Horatio Ballard, who was a prominent lawyer of Cortland County, and well known throughout the State. In- 1869 he built the house at Katonah, where he has resided since that time. In the community where he lives, he is a judicious and willing counselor of all who seek his advice, a liberal contributor to religious and chari- table objects, a public-spirited citizen and a valued friend. Robert Cochran, who succeeded Judge Robertson in 1867, was born in New York City in 1824, and after being graduated from Columbia College, became associated in the practice of the law with George T. Strong, with whom he remained for several years. Subsequently he went into partnership with General Munson I. Lockwood at Sing Sing, and afterwards (in 1857) with Samuel E. Lyons, at White Plains. Still later he became a law partner of Judge John W. Mills, formerly county judge. In 1854 he was elected supervisor of White Plains, and at the annual session of the board took a promi- nent and influential part in procuring the passage of the resolutions to change the location of the court- house from the old site on Broadway and to erect the new buildings where they now stand. He was elected on the Democratic ticket as a delegate to the Con- stitutional Convention in 1867, and at the annual election in that year was elected county judge of Westchester Cotmty for the term of four years. In 1874 he was elected to the office of district attorney, and in 1875 was elected supervisor of White Plains, over Elisha Horton, Jr., the then Republican incum- bent. In all these positions Judge Cochran dis- charged the duties confided to him with marked ability, and no one ever questioned his integrity. In the practice of his profession ha was remarkably suc- cessful, and was regarded by his associates at the bar as a learned and brilliant lawyer. He is reputed to have been one of the ablest judges who ever sat upon the county bench. He was learned in the law, con- 532 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. scientious and painstaking in his opinions and emi- nently courteous and dignified. About 1877 Judge Cochran was compelled by fail- ing health to retire from the active practice of his profession. He died December 14, 1880, in Brooklyn, whither he had removed. The cause of his death was consumption, brought on by malaria. He left a widow and several children by a former wife. Silas D. Gifford," then of Morrisania, was chosen in 1871 to succeed Judge Cochran. He was born at Canaan, Columbia County, New York, January 31, 1826. His grandfather, Amaziah Gifford, was a soldier in the Revolution, and was said to have run away from home at the early age of fourteen, joined the armj' and served four years. He then went to Columbia County, where he lived for some years, when he was accidentally recognized by an ac- quaintance, which led to his restoration to his friends and relatives in Dutchess County. He married Sarah Whitman, and they were the parents of four children, — David, who died in Rensselaer County ; Samuel, who moved to the West ; Mary, wife of Silas Devol ; and Isaac S. The latter was a Baptist clergyman, and was settled in Caanan, Columbia County, at the time when his son, the present judge, was born. He mar- ried Annis, daughter of Jonathan Ford, and they were the parents of five children, — Amanda M ; Horace C, of Berlin, Rensselaer County; Silas D., Edwin S., of Stamford, Conn. ; and Sarah J., wife of John M. Lyons. Judge Gifford resided with his parents at Caanan till he reached the age of twelve, and then removed with them to Berlin, Rensselaer County. He after- wards became a student in the well-known collegiate institution at Williamstown, Mass. His father sub- sequently removed to Bedford, in this county, and upon leaving college, his son made his home at the same place. The first episode of his life was a ser- vice of one year as school-teacher at Sleepy Hollow, near TarrytoAvn, where he was a successor of the im- mortal " Ichabod Crane," though his career as an in- structor of youth did not terminate as disastrously as did that of his " illustrious predecessor." He then entered the law-oflice of Hon. Robert S. Hart, at Bedford, and upon being admitted to the bar in 1852, establislied an office of his own in Morrisania, and has kept his law-office there until the present. Be- coming prominent in politics and in his profession, he was appointed to the office of town superintend- ent of common schools, elected justice of the peace in 1856, and re-elected at the close of his term. In 1862 he was appointed by Governor Morgan surrogate of Westchester County, to fill the vacancy occasioned by the death of Hon. Robert H. Coles. He was elected supervisor of Morrisania in 1870. His elec- tion to the office of county judge of Westchester County occurred in 1871, and he held the office con- 1 This sketch was prepared and inserted by the editor. tinuously till the close of 1883. Upon the occasion of his retirement from a position he had so long and worthily filled, he was presented by the officers of the court with a beautiful gavel, as a token of their high appreciation of the dignity and impartiality which had ever characterized his discharge of official duties, and of their esteem of his many excellencies as a citizen. He was appointed a member of the Recruiting Committee during the late war, was instrumental in organizing several companies of volunteers, and by his active energy the quota of troops required from his town at that time was supplied without the neces- sity of a draft. During long years of prominence in political affairs he has always been recognized as among the leaders of his party, and his official career has been an honor to himself and to the community whose suffrages placed him in a well-deserved posi- tion. He married Miss Elizabeth, daughter of John Rae. They have two children, Jessie and Stanley, both now living with their jjarents at Marble Hall. Judge Gifford lives in the village of Tuckahoe, in the town of East Chester, in a mansion known far and wide as "Marble Hall." It stands upon the site of the home of Stephen Ward, a prominent Revolu- tionary hero, who was surrogate of the county and a citizen of character and influence. This locality was the scene of a sanguinary conflict between the contending forces in the Revolution, when Ward's house was burned. The present incumbent, Isaac N. Mills, of East Chester, was chosen at the election of 1883 to succeed Judge Gifibrd, and is the present county judge. The following sketch of Judge Mills is taken from the)l| Mount Vernon Chronicle of October 19, 1883, and is inserted in this chapter upon the sole responsibility of the editor : " It is unnecessary for us to tell the people of the town of East Chester who the Republican nominee for county judge is ; but in order that those outside of our town who do not know him may be able to fully realize his fitness for the office he seeks, the following sketch of his life may prove useful : " He is a descendant, on his father's side, from a family of farmers, of moderate means, who have re- sided and filled farms in the town of Thompson, Windham Co., Connecticut, prior to the Revolution- ary War. On his mother's side, he is descended from a family of Rhode Island Quakers, residents of that State for many generations, to a branch of which fam- ily General Greene, of Revolutionary fame, belongs. Mr. Mills was born in the town of Thompson, Conn., September 10, 1851, and is, therefore, thirty-two years of age. At the age of seventeen he decided to become a lawyer and entered the Providence Confer- ence Seminary, at Greenwich, R. I., to j)repare for college. In the winter of 1869 and 1870 he taiigiit » a district school for a term, near Newport, at the same « THE BENCH AND BAR. 5:53 time working evenings, in order to keep up his | studies in ills ehiss iit tlie seminary. In the sununer j oC 1870 Mr. ^lills gniduated from the seminary with 1 the hijrhest rank in his class. That same fall he en- ! tered Auiherst College, where, during the four years course, several prizes for excellence in Latin, Greek, philosophy, physiology, debate and extemporaneous speaking were awarded to him. In 1874 he graduated as the valedictorian of his class — a class numbering in all ninety-five members, out of which seventy-five graduated. Of that class, two of the graduates are now professors in Columbia College, one is a professor at Williams College and several others are prominent in other professions. Mr. Mills then entered Colum- bia Law College, of New York City, from which he graduated in 187<). In October, 187G, he came to Mount Vernon and became a member of the law-firm of Mills & Wood. He continued as such, in the active practice of law, until May, 1882, when that firm was dissolved by mutual consent. Since then he has been actively engaged in legal practice in this county and in New York City. Wliile a resident here he has been a close student of the law, and has devoted him- self exclusively to its practice. It is conceded by all who know him that he is honest, upright and able. He has been engaged in many important litigations ' and has been largely succcsslu! in them. The judges and lawyers before whom and with whom he has prac- ticed s|)eak of him in the highest terms. There is no one at the Westchesi er County bar who is more devoted j to the interests of his clients, or earnest or successful in i their advocacy. He will, if elected, make an excep- I tionally able and un(iucstionably upright judge, and for this reason sliould receive the votes of his feilow- citizeus. His ability as a lawyer, his thoroughness, 1 his keenness in detecting the salient point, and, above all, his judicial temperament, the proprietor of the Chronicle can speak most uncjualifiedly, because he has known Mr. Mills as a fellow law student and a partner in the practice of the law for eight years. In the law school he ranked among the very brightest, keenest, hard-working men, and his record at the Westchester bar is one full of honor." Only three of the judges of the present Supreme Court have been Westchester men, viz. : tlie late William M. Scrugham, of Yonkers;' Abraham B. Tappan, of Fordham, who is now living, and .Jackson 0. Dykman, the present incumbent. Judge Dykman- was born in the town of Patter- son, in Putnam County. His great-grandfather, .Jo- seph Dykman, settled in what is now the town of Southeast, in that county, and became a captain in the Continental army in the Revolutionary War. His early life was the uneventful career of a boy in the country, attending the common school of the neighborhood and working on a farm. In this man- Sh'c history of that town. This aketcU was preptued and inserted by tlie editor. ner he obtained sufhcient education to enable him to teach a common school at a very early age. He pursued this occupation until he commenced the study of the law in the office of the Hon. William Nelson, then a prominent lawyer at Peekskill, West- chester County, who manifested a lively interest in his advancement, and gave him generous aid. After his admission to the bar, he settled in Cold Spring, Putiuini County, where he was shortly after elected school commissioner, and subsequently district attor- ney of the county. In the spring of 18()6 he removed to White Plains, in Westchester County, where he has since resided. In the fall of 18G8 he was elected, by a very hand- some majority, district attorney of Westchester County, then a very responsible positiou, which he tilled to the entire satisfaction of the people. He particularly distinguished himself by the energy, skill and success with which he prosecuted the famous Buckhout murder trial, one of the celebrated cases in the history of the county. In the fall of 1875 he was elected to the high office of justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York for the Second Judicial District by a union of both political parties. He was nominated and su])- ported as the regular candidate of the Kepublican party and elected by the people by a majority ex- ceeding ten thousand. That nomination, made by a party with which he had never acted, was a splendid tribute to his ability, integrity and impartiality, and the result has shown that the confidence of the people was not misplaced. In the iierfornumce of his judicial duties, Judge Dykman is ever patient, affable and courteous. He is kind and obliging to the members of the bar, and especially so to the younger lawyers. He has been a member of the general term of the Supreme Court from the time he took his seat on the bench, and his oi)ini()ns in that court, in the numerous cases on ap- j)eal, evince laborious research, sound judgment and discretion and absolute fairness and impartiality, and demonstrate the propriety of his elevation to the high judicial position he occui)ies. At the circuit for the trial of cases he is a fiivorite with both lawyers and suitors for his j)atience and impartiality. He manifests great love for justice and right and deep abhorrence for wrong and oppression. He is emphatically a man of the people, with whom he has always mingled freely and sympathized fully, and whose interests he has ever been ready to maintain and defend. He li.stens with willingness to the petitions and complaints of all, and the people love him and place reliance upon hiin. He is a man of simple habits and mode.st deportment, but stu- diously observes the qualities of amenity and pro- priety, and treats all with whom he comes in contact with great consideration and politeness. In many ways he is an illustration of what may be accomplished under ourrepublican iustitutions, where 534 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. all positions are within the grasp of those who desire to attain them. By energy and perseverance he ha.s risen to a high position without the aid of wealth or influence. The people have found him a man on whom they could rely, and have accordingly bestowed on him their confidence and raised him to eminence, and it is not too much to say that he has fulfilled all their expec- tations. There never was a stain on his private character nor on his public record , and the breath of suspicion has never assailed him. In his domestic and private life he has been ex- emplary and fortunate. He was early married to Miss Emily L. Trowbridge, of Peekskill, a descendant of the New Haven family of that name, a most excel- lent and domestic lady, who aided and encouraged him in all his struggles; and he never hesitated to declare that he owes his success and advancement to her untiring energy and zeal, her wise counsel and her laudable ambition. In many dark days she showed him the silver lining of the cloud and gave him new hope and energy. She still lives to share his honors and his prosperity as she shared his adversity, — -a . noble example of a faithful wife, a devoted mother and a benevolent Christian woman. They have two sons, both of whom are lawyers. The elder, William N. Dykroan, married Miss Bell Annan, and is practicing his profession very success- fully in Brooklyn. The youngest, Henry T. Dykman, married Miss Ella B. Clyne, of Dutchess County, and is practicing law in White Plains, where he has accu- mulated a very good practice. Such is the Honorable Jackson O. Dykman, and his example may well be imitated by the young men of the country. He is a Democrat in the broadest sense of the term, but not a partisan, and a consistent member of the Episcopal Church. The following is a list of the surrogates, as given in the New York civil list. Most, if not all, are men- tioned biographically in our sketches of the bar, which ibllow, — 17.30, Gilbert Willet. 1754. Jolin Bartow. 17G1. Caleb Fowler. 176(5. David Daton. 1778. Rieliard Hatfield. 1787. Philip Pell, Jr. 1800. Samuel Youngs. 1802. Edward Tboin.os. 1808. Ezra Lockwood. 1810. Samuel Youngs. 1811. Ezra Lockwood. 1813. Samuel Youngs, Samuel Clowes was the first lawyer, of whom any record can be obtained, who practiced in Westchester County. He was a Queens County man and filled the office of clerk of that county from April 30, 1701, to July, 1710. Having moved to Westchester County, he soon rose to prominence, and from 1717 to 1744 j he was one of the two leading attorneys of the West- | 1815, Henry White. 1819, Samuel Youngs. 1821, Ebenezer Whfte, .Jr. 1828. Jonathan Ward. 1840. Alexander H. Wells. 1844. Frederick J. Coffin. 1847. Lewis C, Piatt. 1855, Robert H, Coles. 18G2, Silas D. Gifford. 1862, John W, Mills. 1870, Owen T, Coffin. Chester bar, and doubtless the first prosecuting attor- ney of Westchester County, December 9, 1722, oc- curs the following entry in the court records of White Plains: "The Court of Gen'l Sessions appoints Mr. Samuel Clowes counsel for the King in all cases where he is not already concerned for the subject." After 1744, owing to his advanced age, he gave up the active practice of a profession in which he had risen to eminence, commanding the respect and admiration of his brother lawyers and of the people. Mr. Clowes died, full of years, in Jamaica, Long Island, in 1760. In his will, which bears date of July 24, 1759, but was not offered for probate until August 28, 1760, he put down his age at eighty-five years and five months.' He was, therefore, over eighty-six years of age at the time of his death, the exact date of which we have failed to discover. Another lawyer, whose name appears simultane- ously with that of Mr. Clowes, in 1717, in connection with a number of proceedings in the Court of Com- mon Pleas, was Vernon. His first name is omit- ted in the court records, and little is known of him beyond the fact that he practiced law until 1728. Mr. Murray and Mr. Jamison are next mentioned — first name omitted— as practicing, from 1719 to 1736- 37, in Westchester County. The former was, no doubt, Joseph Murray, of New York, member of the Colo- nial Council of New York from 1744-58.^ He died in 1758. There can be also little doubt that " Mr. Jam- ison'' was David Jamison, one of the patentees of Harrison's Purchase (the town of Harrison), at one time chief justice of New Jersey and attorney-gen- eral of New York.'' Mr. Wileman (doubtless Henry Wileman) practiced occasionally in the Westchester County Courts from 1720 to 1725.* John Chambers, of New York, practiced in the Westchester courts from 1724 to 1751. He was an able and successful lawyer, he and Mr. Clowes doing al- most all the legal business until Mr. Clowes retired, in 1744, when Chambers retained the lion's share. Other lawyers, hailing principally from New York City or from Queens County, appeared infrequently in the County Courts in those early years. They were Whitehead, 1721; Costifin, 1728; Price, 1728; T. Smith (possibly Thomas Smith, of New York, mem- ber of the Committee of One Hundred in 1775), whose name is frequently mentioned, 1727-69 ; Ed- wardBlagge, 1728-32; Seymour, 1729; Lodge, 1731-56; Kelley, 1732-51; Warrol, 1732; White, 1740-41; Crannel, 1744; Green, 1744-47. John Bartow, of Westchester town, was a lawyer of some repute from 1742 until 1772. He at one time (1760-64) held the office of county clerk. He died in 1802, at eighty-seven years old. Mr. Bartow, we 1 Record of Wills, N. Y, City, vol, xxii, p, 232. 2 N, Y, Civil List, 3 Bolton, pp, 367-,368, foot note, and N, Y, Civil List, » N, Y. Civil List, THE BENCH AND BAR. 535 l)elieve, was the first attorney resident in Westchester County. .John Alsop, of New York, practiced law in West- chester County, with remarkable success, between 1744 and 1759, inclusive. Benjamin Nicoll, lawyer of New York, was clerk of Westchester County in 1745. He died about 1759-()0, as there is an entry in the record of the pro- ceedings of the Court of Common Pleas, May, 17G0, of an order appointing Thomas Jones attorney, in a certain cause, " in the room of Benjamin Nicolls, de- ceased." Mr. Nicoll was a lawyer of great ability. Timothy Wetniore, referred to above, was one of the leading attorneys at this bar previous to the Revolu- tion. He was the son of Rev. James Wetmore, of Rye, and a man of influence in the community. Pie was graduated from King's College in 1758, and was admitted to practice April 26, 1760. He was a pro- nounced Tory, and signed the protest at White Plains, April 11, 1775, against Congress and com- mittees, and pledged his life and property to support the King. He afterwards removed to the province of New Brunswick where he practiced his profession many years and held situations of honor and trust. In 1800 he returned to New York, where he died March, 1820, aged eighty-three or eighty-five years.^ The court records furnish us with the names of a number of lawyers who practised for one or more years in the county. Having failed to obtain such information concerning them as could be embodied into a biographical notice, we give here merely the names and dates at which they appear on the records, between 174.") and 1776, — Samuel Clowes, Jr., 1745-55 ; Parker, 1747-49; McEvers, 1748, 1749 and 1756; Bennett, 1748-58; John Cortlandt, 1750-56; Scott, 1752- 53; Moore, 1752-65 ; Augustine "Van Cortlandt, 1753- 67; Woods, 1762-76; Ludlow, 1761-71; Kent, 1762-72; Ryker, 1765-(38 ; Helme, 1765-73; Vincent, Matthews, 1770-71 ; Benson, 1771 ; Antill, 1771 ; Townsend, 1770-76 (probably Micah Townsend, Esq., of White Plains) ; Jphn McKcs.son, 1771 ; Wickham, 1763-72; De Peyster, 1773 ; Murray, 1774; and Bogart, 1776. Hon. Richard Morris (of the Morrises, of Morrisa- nia, and whose biography is given in another chapter) practiced in Westchesfer County (1752-76) ; He, with Thomas Hicks (1752-64), Benjamin Kissam (1750-75) and Timothy Wetmore, afterwards attorney- general of the province of New Brunswick, became the leading lawyers after Alsop and Nicolls had ceased to figure. Thomas Jones (1760-71) and Samuel Jones (1764-76) did also a good deal of legal business. Gouverneur Morris, son of Hon. Lewis Morris, fourth proprietor and second lord of the Manor of 'Communicated by .Tosiah Mitchell, Esq., Authorities N. Y. Revo- lutionary Papers, p. 159; Sabin's "Loyalist," p. 415; "Wetmore Memorial," Muiisell i Rowland, Albany, 1861. Morrisania, practiced law in Westchester County about the year 1772. He had graduated at King's College (now Columbia), in 1768. Entering upon the practice of law, he soon gained a high reputation. lu 1775 he was a delegate to the Provincial Congress in New York. The same year he was appointed a mem- ber of the Committee for Public Safety for Westchester County. In 1776 he was one of the committee for draughting a Constitution for the State of New York. He went to France in 1787 and remained in Paris until 1795, as American minister, witnessing thus the terrible scenes of the French Revolution from its in- cipiency to its consummation. He exhibited as great ability in his public capaci- ties as he had displayed oratorical talents and legal learning at the bar. He was a member cf the con- vention which framed the Constitution of the United States; "was chosen Senator of New York in 1800, and in 1808 appointed one of their commissioners to lay out the city of New York into streets and avenues • north of Bleecker Street. In the summer of 1810 he examined the route for the Erie Canal, and took an active part in originating and promoting that noble work." 2 He died in 1816, aged sixty-four. His wife was Ann Carey Randolph, daughter of Thomas Randolph, of Roanoke, and a descendant of the celebrated Pocahon- tas. He left a son, Gouverneur Morris, Esq., of Mor- risania. Barber, already quoted, says of him — " The activity of his mind, the richness of his fancy and the copiousness of his eloquent conversation were the admiration of all his acquaintances, and he was uni- versally admitted as one of the most accomplished and prominent men of our country." The illustrious John Jay, LL.D., first chief justice of the United States under the Constitution of 1789, practiced in the Westchester County Courts from 1769 to 1776. Judge Jay was the eighth child of Peter Jay, Esq., merchant, by his wife, Mary Van Cortlandt. He was born on the 12th of December, 1745. He re- ceived a collegiate education at King's College and took his degree of Bachelor of Arts in 1764. Already he had decided upon the law as his profession, and in 1768 he was admitted to the bar. A mere outline of the life of this great citizen would fill more space than we can devote to the bench and bar of Westchester County. From the day when he was appointed to the First American Congress, in 1774, to the year 1801, when he retired from public life to enjoy well- earned rest at Bedford, in this county, his career was of usefulness and patriotic devotion. Chief justice of New York from 1777 to 1779, President of Con- gress, minister plenipotentiary to Spain in 1779, a signer of the definitive treaty of peace with Great Britain in 1783, chief justice of the United States in 1789 and minister plenipotentiary to Great Britain in 1794, he rendered the most eminent services to the , 8 Barber, Hist. Coll. of N. Y. 536 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. government he had helped to form. He closed his Ijnblic career as Governor of the State of New York, from 1795 to 1801. He died full of years and honor, May 17, 1829. The following entry appears in the record of the Court of Common Pleas of West- chester County, under date of May 25, 1829 : " The court and members of this bar, entertaining the high- est respect for the pure and exalted character of the late venerable John Jay, do resolve that we will wear crape upon the left arm for thirty days in token of our respect." Ability, firmness, patriotism and in- tegrity^ — all that go to make man great, — he possessed in an eminent degree ; and, better' still, he was, as the last lines of his epitaph recite, "in his life and in his death, an example of the virtues, the faith and the hopes of a Christian." John Jay,' son of William Jay, distinguished as an author and jurist, and grandson of the illu.strious chief justice whose name and works are emblazoned •on the scroll of American fame, was born in New York, June 23, 1817. His early life was passed in the home of his grandfather, at the family seatin Bedford, where he remained till the death of the latter in 1829. His early education began under the most favorable circumstances, and was finished at Columbia College, where he graduated with high honors in 183G. He began the study of law in the office of Daniel Lord, Jr., having as a fellow-student Hon. William M. Evarts. During his college days the Anti-Slavery movement began to be the all-absorbing topic of the hour, but there are few of the rising generation who can appreciate the difficulties which a young man of talent and ancestral name would encounter in allying himself to the then unpopular party, and identifying himself with the avowed opponents of the system which was supported by the wealth and power of the country, and the authority of the Church, and de- clared to be in full accord alike with the teachings of the Bible and the Constiiution, established by the founders of the republic, which controlle d the actions of every department of the government, and moulded the views and commanded the supf.ort of every officer, from the President to the postmaster of the humblest village. To those who can understand the power and influence of this institution in the day when Mr. Jay began his life-work, the destruction of slavery must appear as the miracle of modern times. In 1834 he became a manager of the New York Young Men's Anti-Slavery Society. On the 4th of July of that year, a day sacred to freedom, an anti- slavery meeting in New York was disj^ersed by a mob, and the citj' was the scene of riot and outrage, against which the authorities afforded no protection. Among the residences marked out for attack was that of Dr. Abraham R. Cox, with whom Mr. Jay was then living, but the determined action of a few young men, who, with himself, prepared for an armed resistance, in- I Tills sketch was prepared and inserted by the editor. duced the mob to pass on to places that were not pro- tected by equally brave defenders. From that time until the day when slavery came to an ignominious end he was in full accord with the leaders of emanci- pation, and in 1839 he took an active part in prepar- ing the way by which the Abolitionists became a dis- tinct political party, with platforms and candidates of their own. In that year he presented to the Whig National Convention an elaborate report as to the powers and duty of Congress under the Constitutioa to exclude slavery from the Territories, and in a speech on the " Dignity of the Abolition Cause," he urged political action and the use of the ballot, call- ing upon the friends of the cause to no longer confine themselves to appeals to the conscience and under- standing. During the same year he was brought still more prominently into notice through a controversy with some of the higher officials of the Episcopal Church, arising from the exclusion from the Theo- logical Seminary of a colored candidate for priestly orders. In 1842 he delivered an address on the " Progress and Results of Emancipation in the West Indies," and to his far-seeing mind the time seemed not distant when a similar result would be accom- plished in our own land. la 1844, when the question of Texan annexation was attracting the attention of the country, he was the organizer of a demonstration against the project, and was supported by many of the most distinguished men of the day, the presiding officer of the meeting being the venerable Albert Gallatin, the last survivor of the Cabinet of Jefferson. Although in the Presidential contest which succeeded, a strong effort was made to induce the Abolitionists to cast their votes for Henry Clay, yet, through the influence of Mr. Jay, and the leaders whose views were identical with his own, sixty thousand votes were given by the new party for the Hon. John P. Hale, who was thus the first Anti-Slavery candidate presented for the suffrages of the country. In the practice of his profession Mr. Jay was fre- quently called upon to defend in the courts persons arrested as fugitive slaves. In the peculiar state of feeling which then existed, the defense of these cases could not fail to attract public attention in all sec- tions of the country, and the reported cases, among which may be mentioned "In re Kirk," "la re Da Costa " and the famous " Lemon Case," which were conducted by him with matchless ability, must ever be an important chapter in the legal hi.story of the times. In 1848 Mr. Jay, accompanied by his wife, made a visit to Europe, and during his travels formed many acquaintances among the most prominent men of the day. While in France he did not fail to visit what was to him a spot endeared by ancestral tradition, the "City of the Huguenots." Upon his return he re- sumed his labors for the cause of freedom, and when the country was agitated by the proposal to rejieal the Missouri Compromise, he was among the first to gird for THE BENCH AND BAR. 537 the coming struggle, and a call prepared by himself, and headed by the significant words, " No violation of [ilighted faith," "No repeal of the Missouri Com- promise," filled the Broadway Tabernacle, on the even- ing of January 30, 18j4, with the best citizens of New York. The resolutions drawn by him were adopted by acclamation, and the opinions thus expressed found a ready response in every free State throughout the Union. A succession of meetings organized by him for the same object served to intensify this feel- ing, and resulted in the establishment of the Repub- lican party, of which Mr. Jay was justly considered one of the most prominent founders. In the Presi- dential campaign of 1856 he could not fail to take a conspicuous part, and a speech delivered by hira at Bedford on the 8th of October, " America Free or America Slave," was one of the most efficient political documents of the time. During this time he was un- ceasing in his labors to gain the influence of the church in behalf of the cause of freedom, — labors which unfortunately met with bitter opposition, which only served to show him in his true character as a fearless champion of the right. Throughout the struggle which culminated in the triumph of the Republican party and the election of Abraham Lincoln, Mr. Jay was a conspicuous actor. Informed at an early hour of the Confederate design to seize the national capital, he called the attention of the nation to the danger, and prompt means were taken to avert it. In April, 18(51, he was one of the organizers of the great meeting in Union Square New York, from which proceeded a flood of patriot- ism that swept the Northern States. During the war he was one of the most eSicient members of the Loyal League of New Y'ork, and afterwards of the Union League Club, in the councils of which he has •ever held an important place. When under the auspices of the Union League, and by the authority of Secretary Stanton, colored regiments were raised, lie made an eloquent address to the second of these commands previous to its departure for the seat of war. His son, Colonel William Jay, who served from the beginning to the end of the war on the staffs of some of the most prominent generals, fre- quently received visits from his father, who was a witness of the destruction of several national vessels by the ironclad " Merrimac," and her subsequent de- feat by the " Monitor," and accompanied President Lincoln, Mr. Stanton and Mr. Chase on their return to Washington from Fortress Monroe, a few days af- ter the famous fight. lu the fall of 1S(55 he again visited Europe, and presided at the Thanksgiving dinner at the Grand Hotel, in Paris, on the 7th of December, where, at his suggestion. Southern gentlemen who acquiesced ID the result of the war, were invited to take part in the festival. During his absence Mr. Jay was elected president of the Union League Club, and when a disposition 51 was manifested on the part of some of its members to dissolve the organization, on the ground that its work was finished, his influence was given in behalf of the majority, who believed that the club had an impor- tant duty to perform in the future. In 18G7 he was appointed by Governor Fenton a commissioner to represent the State at the establishment of the Na- tional Cemetery on the battle-field of Antietam, and true to his nature, he was prompt to sustain the view that liberality and magnanimity alike required that the Confederate dead should also receive honoralJle burial. In April, 1869, he was nominated by Presi- dent Grant to the important position of minister to Austria, a nomination which was unanimously con- firmed by the Senate ; and at a meeting of the Union League, an address was delivered to their retiring president by Dr. Joseph P. Thompson, in response to which Mr. Jay expressed the belief that the honor was intended as a compliment to the club, and as a recognition of the efficient aid it had furnished to the government in its struggle for existence. While minister at Vienna he was empowered to negotiate a treaty which should determine the status of Aus- trian subjects who had become naturalized as Ameri- can citizens, and it was finally ratified by the Austro- Hungarian government, after much opposition from successive war ministers, who naturally regarded it as an effort to aid Austrian subjects to evade the mili- tary service of the Empire. Another convention was concluded by Mr. Jay in 1871, with Count Andrassy, affording to each country a mutual protection in trade marks, a matter of great importance to our manufac- turers, and this treaty is remarkable as being the highest recognition that the Kingdom of Hungary had received in four hundred years. The Vienna Exposition of 1873 led many Ameri- can citizens to visit the Austrian capital, and in- creased the social duties of the Legation. The tem- porary suspension by the President of the American Commission, on the ground of irregularities in the management, and the oflicial duties which devolved upon Mr. Jay in consequence, aroused much personal feeling against him, and gave rise to much abuse and misrepresentation in both the European and Ameri- can press. Charges made against him were, after full examination, found to be groundless, and his character as a wise and able representative of this nation was fully sustained. In 1874 he resigned his diplomotic position and re- turned to America during the following year. In 1876 he delivered before the New Y'ork Historical Society the Centennial Oration in commemoration of the battle of Harleni Plains, and, at the request of the same society, prepared a tribute to the memory of John Lothrop Motley, his predecessor at Vienna, a paper which excited considerable controversy. In 1877 he was appointed by the Secretary of the Treas- ury chairman of a committee to investigate the af- faire of the New Y'ork Custom House ; — and his re- 538 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. port led to many changes and reforms in that branch of the national service. During the same year he was iigain elected president of the Union League, and upon his declining a re-nomination, in 1878, he was succeeded by George Cabot Ward. In January and February, 187S, he took an active part in opposing the ill-advised attempt of the city officials to erect an armory for the National Guard in Washington Square, and, in company with many of the best citizens, deemed it of importance that the few breathing-places in the crowded portions of the city should not be diminished. With a deep interest in the welfare of that portion of Westchester County which had been the home of his ancestors, as well as his own, he was prominent in the formation of a society for village improvement, known as the Katonah Association, which has been of great and lasting benefit in elevating the taste of the community. The news of the assassination of President Garfield reached Mr. Jay while yet in Europe, and at a meet- ing of American citizens held at Paris, an eloquent address was delivered by him, portraying in vivid language the duties of the hour. The. frequent contributions from his pen upon the questions of the day are well-known to all, but among tliem especial mention may be made of arti- cles which appeared in the International Review, on the Catholic question and on Presidential elections. The four hundreth anniversary of the birth of Martin Luther occurred November 4, 1883, and the event was duly celebrated by a public meeting at the Academy of Music, under the auspices of the Ameri- can Evangelical Alliance. "Never before," says the New York Herald, " was such a throng gathered under its roof," and the opening address made by Mr. Jay, as president of the Alliance, was an effort worthy of himself and of the fame of the "Great Reformer." IJ])on the seventy-ninth annivei-sary of the New York Historical Society he read a carefully prepared and highly interesting paper upon the peace negotia- tions of 1782-83. This paper, which was printed, is a valuable contribution to national history. To enumerate the various speeches delivered by Mr. Jay upon important occasions, in which he has ex- prcfsed hi.s views upon national questions, and the various writings he has contributed to our historical and political literature, would far exceed present limits. Through a long life he has been a conspic- uous actor upon the stage of jniblic events, and his views and ofjinions have never failed to attract atten- tion and command respect, and his name will de- scend to ]jostcrity sus unsullied as that of his illus- trous ancestor. During his whole career he has never in any controversy 8to|)ped to consider the odds against which he was fighting. To him to undertake has been to continue, and tiie sentiment ascribed to the Hero of Switzerland seems to have been the motive-power of his own actions: " Je ne sais pas H la cfios^cat possible, jnaisje .saiji yii'il faut la /aire." In him the spirit of the Huguenots lives again, and in him we see a worthy successor of the gallant host who fought at Ivry, and followed as their oritlanime the helmet of Navarre. When the sessions of court began to be resumed, in 1778, an entirely new set of lawyers appeared. From that time to 1794 the name of Pell appears very frequently on the records. This was doubtless Hon. Philip Pell, born July 7, 1753, "judge-advo- cate of the Continental army in the Kevolutiouary war, and a member of the Cincinnati Society." Mr. Bolton says of him: " This illustrious individual had the honor of riding by the side of General Washing- ton when he entered New York City upon ' evacu- ation day,' November 25, 1783. He was a graduate of King's College (now Columbia) in 176G, and is said to have been one of the best Greek scholars of that day." Hon. Philip Pell was the grandson of Philij), fifth son of Thomas, eldest son of Lord John Pell. He lived in Pclham and was twice married — first, to Mary Ward ; second, to Anna Lewis. He died in 1811, and left an only son, like him named Philip, the father of Philip Pell, of San Francisco, Cali- fornia. Richard Hatfield was another leading lawyer in Westchester County after 177G, the period of his greatest activity ceasing about 17!U), though he con- tinued to plead occasionally after that date. He was evidently an energetic man, of uncommon activity, and filled many offices. He held that of county clerk from 1777 to 1802, was surrogate of the county from 1778 to 1787, a delegate to the State Convention which ratified the Constitution in 1788 ; member of Assembly in 1794; member of the Council of Ap- pointment of the State in 1795, and member of the. State Senate from 1795 to 1803. He was one of the organizers of the Presbyterian Church at White Plains, and assisted in organizing the Methodist Church there also. He died at his residence in White Plains in 1813, and left a son Richard, whose name also appears, but infrequently, as practicing law in Westchester County, and a daughter Esther. Another daughter married James Woods, and left a son, Rich- ard Hatfield Woods. John Strang, one of the attorneys of the Supreme Court was admitted to practice in the Court of Com- mon Pleas of Westchester County in May, 1779, and remained in practice until in the year 1797. During this ])eriod he was one of the three leading lawyers of the county. Mr. Strang was the son of ]Major Joseph Strang, a Revolutionary character of note in Yt)rktown, and was born near Crompond- He studied law in the ollicc of John Jay, afterwards chief justice of the United States. His place of residence, at least during a portion of the period of his activity as an attorney, was in Redlbrd, and there Peter Jay Munro was a student in his office for a few months. THE BENCH AND BAB. 539 Probably at the termination of his career of active iiactice he removed to Peekskill. At least he lived ; liere for many years towards the close of his life at :he house of his sister-in-law, Mrs. Underbill Strang. .Mr. Strang died about the year 1830, being then nearly eighty years of age. He never married. A few old-time residents of Peekskill remember him as he appeared late in life, and how he used to pace up and down the sidewalk in front of his residence, hold- ing in front of him a long cane, which he grasped a little above the middle, and wearing a shirt with a ruffled bosom and a tightlj'-fitting dress coat. In stature he was small. He is said to have been a man (if reserved manners and of strong likes and dislikes. He is said to have been buried at Cronipond- A tra- dition among the descendants of Underbill Strang is, that John Strang was an assistant judge ad»-ocate in the Revolutionary War, and, but for the fact that he was away on a furlough, would have acted as judge at the trial of Major Andre. William Popham, of Scarsdale, practiced in the ^\'^■stchester County Courts in 1785. This gentleman, better known as Major William Po])ham, descended , from a very old and distinguished family, the Pop- hams of Popham, in the county of Hampshire, Eng- iand. The sixth in descent from Gilbert Popham, I the founder of the family in the year 1200, was Sir John Popham, Knight of the Bath, lord chief justice * of the Queen's Bench. The Pophams took sides against the King in the English Revolution and, ' upon the restoration of Charles II., John Popham, j the direct ancestor of Major Popham, removed to : Ireland. He was for many years a gentleman of the I household to King James the First, and married, it is said, a daughter of the celebrated president John Bradshaw. His great-grandson, William Popham, of Bundon, county of Cork, Ireland, was the father of Major William Popham- This gallant soldier was born in Ireland in 1752 and came to America with his parents at the early age of nine years. The Pophams settled in the town of Newark (State of Delaware), where William spent his youth and re- ceived a finished education. He was intended for the ministry, but on the breaking out of the Revolution- ary War he entered the American army.' He distinguished himself at the battle of Long Island — his first engagement — and was made a cap- tain. At White Plains and at Brandywine ho again gave proofs of indomitable valor and military ability. He acted as aid to General Clinton in the Northern Division of the army, and was also the aid of General Sullivan in the western exi)edition among the In- dians. After the war he resided a few years in the city of Albany, where he entered upon the study of the law, and pra(tice White Plains. Atkins, T. Astley .... \ onkers. Clnrtiin Pliorlec V Bailev, S. C. H Cortlandt. (Griffin T-Tonrv P Sing Slug. Yonkers. Westchester, Halsey Edward G Pppkfiktll Slamaroneck. TTiii-t T?nht»rt S Banks, Charles G . . . . New Rochelle. Hart Rc'inald Peekskill. Barnett, William E . . . Pelham Manor. Hawlcv l^avid Peekskill. Westchester Ppplcskill Mount Vernon. PppL'oL'ill Westchester. Yonkers. tJAlla F \V Brown, William Reynolds Wniite Plains. Tarrytown. Hartsdale. TTimt Ttiiip^ TNf Yonkers. PTiinf Tiavtil Buel, Oliver P Vonkers. Butler, William Allen Yonkers. Butler, William Allen, Jr Yonkers. (fiinfin ir ti\rt R V Hartsdale. Peekskill. Burns, Arthur J Yonkers. Pa^L-ct ill Chamberlain, Henry C. . Inderhill. Clapp, John H Port Chester. Sing Sing. Oose, Odle White Plains. .Srarsdale. •Sing Sing. 1." 1 1 , ,ir(T Wi 1 1 ni O Coffin, Owen T . . . Peekskill. Conklin, William H . . . New Rochelle. Collins, William H . . . Mount Vernon. Couch, Franklin Peekskill. Keye8, Edwin K Yonkers. Crumb, L. F Peekskill. Collins, S. W Harrison. Crane, Joseph T Mount Kisco. Sing Sing. Crane, A. B. . . Hartsdale. Larkin, Francis, Jr Cowles, Charles P . . . . Rye. Cowles, Edward B. . . . Rye. Rye. 550 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Lent, Herbert D Mount Vernon. Littel, John W Peekskill. Lockwood, James B 'White Plains. Logan, Edgar Yonkers. Long, Louis L Armonk. Long, Jacob L Armonk. Lovatt, Edward T Tarrytown. Lyon, Addison J Mount Vernon. McCord, Robert Peekikill. McClellan, P. L Mount Vernon. McClelland, Charles P Dobbs Ferry. Marshall, William J Mount Vernon. Marshall, Stephen S AVhite Plains. MilLs, Isaac N Mount Vernon. Millard, James S Tarrytown. Mitchell, Josiah S White Plains. Murray, William Dobbs Ferry. Moran, James H White Plains. Neil, E. C S')mei-s. Nelson, Henry C Sing .Sing. Noxon, Charles H Kew Rochelle. Owens, Silas J Peekskill. Ostrander, Charles H Mount Vernon. Peck, J. A Port Chester. Paulding, Hiram White Plains. Peake, Cyrus A Yonkers. Pemberton, Wm. H Mount Vernon. Pentz, George B Y'onkers. Peters, J. Montgomery East Chester. Piatt, William P White Plains. Piatt, Lewis C White Plains. Porter, David B Kyo. Post, John J Eye. Poucher, George W Yonkers. Prime. Ralph E Yonkers. Prime, Alanson J Yonkers. Purdy, William F Tarrytown. Purdy, Elias P White Plains. Roosevelt, Henry E New Rochelle. Reevs, Gabriel Yonkers. Reynolds, Pierre . , . Sing Sing. Riley, William .... Yonkers. Robertson, William H. Katonah. Romer, William . . . White Plains. Roosevelt, Charles H. New Rochelle. Sanders. James P. . . Yonkers. Sheil, Denis R Wms. Bridge. Sheldon, George P White Plains. Silkman, Theodore H Y'onkers. Silkman, James B Yonkers. Silliman, Minott M White Plains. Skinner, William M White Plains. Skinner, William M., Jr White I'lains. Small, John C Yonkers. Smith, Duncan Yonkers. Smith, Marvin R Peekskill. Stilwell, Benjamin S Yonkers. Suits, David Mount Vernon. Sweny, William H Yonkers. Squires, Ebenezer P Rye. Tilden, .Samuel J Yonkers. Tierney, Michael J New Rochelle. Taylor, Allen . .Yonkers. Terwilliger, J. W Sing Sing. Thayer, Stephen H., Jr Yonkers. Titus, Charles T. Scarborough. Travis, Eugene B Peekskill. Travis, David W Peekskill. Underbill, A. S Sing Sing. Valentine, William G Sing Sing. Van Cott, William H Mount Vernon. Verplaiick, David White Plains. Watson, Samuel Sing Sing. Westcott, Clarence L White Plains. Williams, Elliott Chappaqna. Williams, David Mount Vernon. Wood, Joseph S Mount Vernon. Woodworth, William A White Plains. Wells, Edward Peekskill. AVilliams, R. H Chappaqua. Yale, Lucius T Tarrytown. Young, Charles H New Rochelle. The present distinguished justice of the Supreme Court from this county, Hon. Jackson 0. Dykman, and surrogate, Hon. Owen T. Coffin, are treated of at length in another part of this work. As we review the Westchester judges and lawyers, their records, professional and otherwise, we readily conclude that the county has been especially gifted in both. Its judges, at least in the past, have been learned, upright and faithful to duty. There is neither record nor tradition that any of them ever was guilty of corrupt or improper conduct in hi» position. Each has left the ermine unsullied. The lawyers, as a class, have been exceptionally able, dignified, courteous, industrious, true to the interests of their clients and trusted counselors of th court. Many of them, as Benjamin Nicoll, Timoth Wetmore, Richard Morris, Gouverneur Morris, John Jay, Philip Pell, Richard Hatfield, John Strang- Peter Jay Munro, Edward Thomas, Martin S. Wil kins, Daniel D. Tompkins, William Nelson, Minot Mitchell, Richard R. Voris, Joseph Warren Tomp kins, Albert Lockw'ood, John J. Clapp, Jonatlia Henry Ferris, Amherst Wight, Jr., and Isaiah T Williams, were lawyers of unusual ability and high reputation. By their careers at the bar, they honored] the legal profession, and remain bright examples foi the emulation of their successors. BIOGRAPHY.' HON. OAVEN T. COFFIX. Of the existing generation of public men, there is none who is more thoroughly identified with the public affairs of Westchester County than its present surrogate, Owen T. Coffin, who was born July 17i 1815, at Wa.shington, Dutchess County, N. Y. He is descended from an honorable ancestry, being sixth in the line from Tristram Coffin, who came from Devon-j shire, England, and was subsequently chief magis-| trate of the island of Nantucket. The energy of the ancestor has been impre.ssed upon his descendants, and their name is identified with many of the mosi importantbusiness enterprises of the country. Amon| the most conspicuous of these descendants was Isaa< Coffin, a gallant naval officer, who, previous to thi Revolution, was in the British service, and rising tc the rank of admiral, was knighted by his sovereignj > The following biographical sketches of members of the WeetchMte County bench and bar were prepared and inserted in this chapter b I the editor. THE BE.NX'H AND BAR. 551 and received a grant of the Magdalen Islands, at the mouth of the St. Lawrence, which are still in the possession of his family. He was afterwards a mem- ber of Parliament, and distinguished both as a wise and a witty legislator. Robert Coffin, the father of Owen T., was a thrifty farmer and a man of high standing and great influ- ence in his town, of which he was a magistrate for many years, and although not a member, he was an adherent of the principles of the Society of Friends, which was very numerous in the section where he lived. Taking a great interest in the affairs of the State, he represented his county for a term or two in the Legislature. He married Magdalen, daughter of Taber Bentley and granddaughter of Col. James Vanderburgh, who was one of the most influential citizens of Beekman, Dutchess County, and a worthy representative of an ancient family, who came from Holland and settled in that region at an early day. He was a member of the Provincial Congress in 177fi, and a zealous friend of the patriot cause. At his house Washington and Lafayette were frequently entertained, with many of their brother officers. The mother of the present surrogate possessed the charac- teristics of a true and noble-hearted woman, which greatly endeared her to her family and friends ; like her husband, she was in sympathy with the principles of the Society of Friends, and excelled in those qualities which have made the members of that faith models of morality and virtue. Between herself and her children there existed a most affectionate confidence, and their joys and sorrows were made her own. The children of Robert and Magdalen Coffin were ten in number. Jane, the oldest (now. deceased), married Caleb Morgan, of Poughkeepsie, and Alex- ander H., the second child, is living in that city. Hezekiah R., Charles and Sarah, wife of Henry M. Swift, live in Dutchess County. Eliza married George B. Caldwell, of Poughkeepsie. George W. is mayor of Santa Barbara, Cal. Wil- liam H., deceased, left a family now living in New York, and Robert G. is on the old homestead, about half a mile south of the village of Mechanic, Washington township, Dutchess County. Owen T. Coffin was the seventh child and the fourth son, and remained on the farm with his parents, as- sisting them during the summer and attending the excellent Quaker school in the winter months. When fourteen years old he was sent to the academy at Sharon, Conn., and thence to Kinderhook Academy, where he was distinguished for his assiduous attention to study and for his great fondness for mathematics, in which he attained proficiency. Entering Union I College in 1833, he graduated in 1837 with great credit in the same class with Hon. John K. Porter, judge of the Court of Appeals, between whom and himself there has been a constant friendship. After leaving college he began the study of law in the office of Judge Rufus W. Peckham, and for a time had charge of the portion of his business usually attended to by a managing clerk. Upon his admission to the bar, in 1840, he established practice in Carmel, Put- nam County, where he remained two years, gaining a large business and winning respect and confidence. In 1845 he became a member of the well-known law- firm of Johnston, Coffin & Eniott, of Poughkeejjsie. He retired from the firm to form a copartnership with General Leonard Maison, a distinguished lawyer and proniinentin State affairs. He continued thepracticeof his profession in Poughkeepsie, holding several i)laces of trust, among them the office of district attorney, until 1851, when he received an invitation from Hon. W. Nelson and his son, W. R. Nelson, to associate himself with them as a partner in a law-office estab- lished in Peekskill, and, having accepted the invita- tion, he removed to this county, which has since been his place of residence. In 1871 he was elected surro- gate of Westchester County, re-elected in 187(5 and again in 1882, and holds the office at present. When one considers the extent of Westchester County, its wealth and population, it is evident that the office of surrogate is one of the most important in the gift of the people. The incumbent is frequently called upon to decide questions of the greatest im- portance and involving extensive interests. To the solution of these questions Mr. Coffin has applied with unceasing industry the powers of an ac- tive and vigorous mind, well stored with legal knowl- edge, and a reputation for honor and integrity which renders his ojiinions and decisions worthy of the re- spect and confience of his legal brethren, and of the entire community. To determine these questions requires a thorough knowledge of the statutory law, and a familiar acquaintance with the cases in which the brightest lights of legal science have given their interpretations of law. That Mr. Coffin possesses these qualities in the fullest degree is a fact that is fully recognized, and it is the unanimous opinion of those most capable to judge that of all who have held the office in Westchester Co., no one deserves to occupy a higher rank, and few have had a more extensive ac- quaintance with the members of the legal profession in the State of New York. To mention even a tithe of them would far exceed these limits, but it is suffi- cient to state that he had abundant opportunity of witnessing the efforts and studying the methods of such "legal giants " as Daniel Cady, Joshua A. Spen- cer, Greene C Bronson, Hiram Denio, Ambrose L. Jordan, and others famous for learning and eloquence. Mr. Coffin married Belinda E., daughter of Gen. Leonard Maison, in 1842. By this marriage he had three children, two of whom died in early childhood, and one, Elizabeth, wife of the late Edward B. Piatt, is living in Dutchess County. ]Mrs. Coffin died in 1856, and, in 1858, he was again married to Harriette, daughter of the late Dr. Samuel Bancroft Barlow, and a sister of S. L. M. Barlow, of New York City. On her father's side, Mrs. Coffin is related to Joel Barlow, 552 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. I the distinguished author of " The Columbiad," and on her mother's to Major Charles Wadsworth, who, when Sir Edmund Andros demanded the charter of Connecticut, snatched it in the darkness caused by the sudden extinction of the lights, and hastened to conceal it in the famous "Charter Oak." By this second marriage Mr. Coffin has two chil- dren, Magdalen Bentley and Samuel Barlow, who is now a student in Union College. A third child died in infancy. Previous to his election as surrogate he was elected, in 1859, supervisor of the town of Cortlandt, but de- clined all offers of re-election. He takes a deep in- terest in educational matters, and has been for twenty- five years president of the board of trustees of the Peekskill Academy. For many years he has been a member and warden of the Episcopal Church at Peekskill, and a regular attendant upon and devout i participator in its services. j In the words of one who has known him for many years — "Though past his sixty-ninth year, Mr. Coffin is still in the vigor of active life. This is no doubt owing to the regularity of his habits and his great fondness for out-door work in field and garden. No one is more systematic in his industry. By it he is enabled to discharge promptly all official duties, to give considerable time to general reading and to work every day with his own hands on his ample grounds situated on the river-bank at Peekskill, which Barry Gray named Sunset Hill. Should a stranger call there in the early morn, or Just before the close of day, in the season for it, and when the weather is propi- tious, and should he encounter a slender man, in shirt sleeves, with a sharp face, aquiline nose, bright, but fixed and cheery look, iron-gray beard and hair, the whole head General Jackson like, and should he re- ceive frank and cordial reception, enlivened with some [ sportive remark, he may know that he is face to face with Owen T. Coffin, surrogate of Westchester County." EDWARD WELLS. Mr. Wells, a leading member of the bar of West- chester County, was born in Durham, Greene County, New York, December 2, 1818. His father, Noah Wells, was a native of Colchester, New London County, Conn., where he married Dimmis, daughter of David Kilbourne. Both families came from Eng- land, and their genealogies have been published by their members. The ancestry of Mr. Wells, on his father's side, has been very thoroughly traced in the " History of the Wells Family," by the late Albert Wells, of New York, a work of the greatest value, and embracing the results of extended research ; and his genealogy on his mother's side appears in the " History of the Kilbourne Family," written by Hon. | Payne Kenyon Kilbourne. The children of Noah Wells were Eev. Noah H. ; Albert, who was thirty years principal of Peekskill Military Academy ; Mary E., wife of Hiram Bell (deceased), of East Haddam, Conn. ; Francis H., a prominent lawyer of San Francisco, Cal. ; and Edward. Noah Wells removed to Greene County in 1810, and died in June, 1829. His widow then removed to Fishkill Landing, in Dutchess County, and her son Edward was fitted for college at Newburgh Academy, which was then under the management of his brother Albert, who was his guardian. In 1835 they re- moved to Sing Sing, where he continued his studies at Mount Pleasant Academy, then under his brother's charge, and at the conclusion of his preparatory course entered Yale College and graduated in 1839. He returned to Sing Sing and studied law in the office of General Aaron Ward, who was associated with Albert Lockwood, and remained till 1842, being ' for a portion of the time assistant teacher in Mount Pleasant Academy. He then removed to White Plains and studied with Minott Mitchell, was ad- mitted to the bar as attorney and solicitor in October, 1842, and in 1845 as counselor-at-law. Upon his admission he removed to Peekskill and established his practice in partnership with John Currey. This partnership was dissolved five years later. Mr. Wells has continued the business till the I present time, and has established not only an exten- sive practice, but a highly honorable reputation as a counselor. In 1850 he was nominated by the Whigs for district attorney, was elected by a majority of three hundred and thirty and at the conclusion of his term re-elected by the largely increased majority of one thousand one hundred, and declining a nomi- nation for a third term, devoted his time and labors to the practice of his profession. He has ever taken an active part in all efforts to promote the moral welfare of the community and was for several years president of the Westchester County Bible Society. He is a zealous advocate of the temperance cause and fearlessly supports its prin- ciples. At the formation of the Republican party in j 1854, he found its views coincident with his own, and has ever since been a prominent member of that or- ganization. Fervid in his opposition to slavery, he i was a firm supporter of the Union in the war which | ended in the destruction of the system which had so long been a blot on the nation. He married Hannah Hamill, daughter of Rev. Charles W. Nassau, D.D., of Lawrenceville, N. J., who was formerly a professor and for a time the presi- dent of Lafayette College, Easton, Pa. Their chil- dren are Edward, Jr., who graduated from Yale College in 1884 ; Charles Nassau, now a student of Lafayette College; and Anna Hamill, who resides with her par- ents at Peekskill. [ Mr. Wells is a man of extensive learning, the pos- sessor of a large and valuable library, well versed in general literature, and especially in the study of Roman civil law, and holds an honorable position as a member of the legal fraternity. 1 1 THE BENCH AND BAR. 553 CHARLES THORN CROMWELL. Mr. Cromwell is a descendant of the famous family whose history was for so many years identified with that of the British Empire. Among his ancestry are en- rolled the names of Thomas Cromwell, Earl of Essex, .Secretary of State to Henry VIII., who was beheaded July 28, 1540 ; Sir Henry Cromwell, of Hinthinhrook, surnamed, for his munificence, the Golden Knight ; Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector of England, and many others.' Two nephews of the Lord Protector came to this country ; one settled in South Carolina and the other in Westchester County. It is from the Westchester branch of the family that Charles Thorn Cromwell is descended. His father, John I. Cromwell, who mar- ried Elizabeth Thorn, of Glen Cove, L. I., was a wholesale dry-goods merchant in New York City un- til the war was declared, in 1812, with Great Britain. At that time he gave up his business, and, raising a company of volunteers, marched with it to the northern frontier, becoming actively engaged there in most of the battles which took place. He was ap- pointed second lieutenant of artillery and was in com- mand of a company at the battle of Plattsburg, where he also acted as quartermaster. His bravery won for him the respect and esteem of his superior of- ficers, and he was brevetted first lieutenant as a reward of merit. Many flattering letters from the generals under whom he served, from time to time, are still in the possession of his son, notable among which is an autograph note from Major-General McComb. At the close of the war his name was honorably mentioned in general orders and the government of- fered him a position upon the peace establishment, which he declined, in order that he might retire from active life, which'he did. Removing to Glen Cove, he purchased a farm and resided upon it until his death, in 1824. Charles Thorn Cromwell, his third child, was born in New York, May 8, 1808. After attending private schools at Jam iica and Flushing, L. I., he entered Union College, graduating in 1829. While there, with three others, all of whom are now dead, he organized the " Sigma Phi Society." After his graduation he entered the law-office of Minott Mit- chell, at White Plains, N. Y., and remained with him two years, when, with two friends, he made a tour of Europe. He spent a year in most interesting and profitable diversion, and then returned to New York and was admitted to the bar. He opened an office in the city, where he remained for many years, building up for himself an extensive and lucrative practice. Twenty years ago he retired from business, though his name is still connected with the legal firm which he organized, and whose office is at No. 21 Park Row. • For a full account of the Cromwell family, see " Foster's British Statesmen," vi. 2; also, "'Carljie's Letters and Speeches of Cromwell," i. 32-411. During his active career Mr. Cromwell handled many prominent cases with such skill as to win for himself not only a high reputation in commercial centres, but also the regard and respect of the entire profession. j For many years he has lived in his beautiful resi- dence on Manersing Island, near Port Chester, spend- ing his winters in New York. i He is a member of Christ Church (Episcopal) and j was formerly one of its vestrymen, having conlibuted largely toward its erection. He married Henrietta Amelia Brooks, daughter of Benjamin Brooks, of Bridgeport, Conn. She is a descendant of Colonel John Jones and Theophilus Eaton, first Governor of the colony of New Haven. There were three chil- dren, one of whom (the eldest son) was drowned from a yacht in Long Island Sound. Those surviving are Oliver Eaton and Henrietta, who married John De ' Ruyter. Mr. Cromwell, though well along in life, still re- tains his strength, and his name continues to be asso- ciated with every progressive and benevolent move- ment in and about the village which is the home I of his choice. He is at present one of the oldest liv- ing members of the St. Nicholas Club. I WILLIAM PATTERSON VAX RENSSELAER. Mr. Vau Rensselaer was the second son of the pa- troon, Stephen Van Rensselaer, of Albany, and was born March 6, 1805. His mother was a daughter of Judge William Paterson, of New Jersey. After graduating at Yale College, in 1824, he was commis- sioned aid-de-camp toGovernor De Witt Clinton, with the title of colonel, which post he soon relinquished, and from 1826 spent four years in Europe, traveling extensively and pursuing legal studies in Edinburgh. I Upon his return he entered the office of Peter A, Jay, then a well-known lawyer in New York. For a number of years afterward he resided in Albany and I Rensselaer County, but the last twenty years of his life were spent at his home at Manursing Island, near Rye, Westchester County. He died in New Y'ork, November 13, 1872. He inherited from his distinguished father many noted characteristics. Conspicuous among these was a true simplicity. Free from all pretension and eminent- ly unselfish, he found his happiness in a life of retire- ment and in unobtrusive but earnest endeavors to do good. A genuine sympathy with works of Christian ^ benevolence was another inherited trait. He was an I attentive observer of the great and philanthropic movements of the day and a most liberal supporter of every worthy cause whose claims were brought to his notice. ■ A man of noble impulses and clear convictions, he was no less decided in the rebuke of injustice and in- iquity that in the approval of that which was good. The uprightness and elevation, the kindliness and generosity of his nature, his fine intellectual gifts and 554 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. high culture, and with all an unaffected humility, the fruit of true religion, made him the marked ex- ample of a Christian gentleman. SAMUEL .TONES TILDEN. In an old-fashioned frame dwelling-house still standing, though considerably older than our Federal Constitution, Mr. Tilden was born on the 9th of Feb- ruary, 1814. The old homestead, where four genera- tions of the family have been reared, fronts upon the i long street which constitutes the back-bone of the village of New Lebanon, in the county of Columbia, in the State of New York. Mr. Tilden's ancestry may be traced back to the latter part of the sixteenth century and to the county ^ of Kent, in England, where the name is still most ' honorably associated with the army, the navy and the church. In 1634 Nathaniel Tilden was among the Puritans who left Kent to settle in America. Eleven years previous he had been mayor of Tenter- den. He was succeeded in that office by his cousin John, as he had been preceded by his uncle John in 1585 and 1600. He removed with his family to Scit- uate, in the colony of Massachusetts, in 1634. He was one of the commissioners to locate that town, and ' the first recorded conveyance of any of its soil was made to him. His brother Joseph was one of the merchant adventurers of Loudon who fitted out the " Mayflower." This Nathaniel Tilden married Hannah Bourne, one of whose sisters married a brother of Governor Winslow and another a son of Governor Bradford. Among the associates of Joseph Tilden in fitting out the " Mayflower" was Timothy Hatherby, who afterward married the widow of Nathaniel Til- den, and was a leading citizen of Scituate until ex- I pelled from public life for refusing to prosecute the Quakers. Governor Tilden's grandfather, John Tilden, set- tled in Columbia County, since then uninterruptedly the residence of this branch of the Tilden family. The Governor's mother was descended from William Jones, Lieutenant-Governor of the colony of New Haven, who, in all the histories of Connecticut, is represented to have been the son of Col. John Jones, one of the regicide judges of Charles the First, who is said to have married a sister of Oliver Cromwell and a cousin of John Hamden. The Governor's father, a farmer and merchant of New Lebanon, w'as a man of notable judgment and practical sense and the accepted oracle of the county upon all matters of public concern, while his opinion was also eagerly sought and justly valued by all his neighbors, but by none more than by the late President Van Buren, who, till his death, was one of his most cherished and intimate personal friends. Samuel J., after a suitable preparatory education ; at Williamstown, Massachusetts, was entered at Yale j College in the class of 1833, where, however, in con- sequence of ill health, he was not able to complete the course. He concluded his collegiate studies at the New York University, and then took the course of law in that institution, at the same time entering the law-office of the late John W. Edmunds, then a prominent member of the New York bar. While yet in his teens he was a watchful student of the polit- ical situation, and tradition has preserved many inter- esting stories of his triumphs, both of speech and pen, in the political arena. Young and obscure as he then was, Presidents .lackson and Van Buren had few more effiective champions in this State of the great measures of their respective administrations than this stripling from New Lebanon. He was admitted to the bar in 1841. Four years before, and when only twenty-three years of age, he delivered a speech in Columbia County onthesubject of " Prices and Wages," which not only attracted the attention and won the admiration of the leading political economists of that time, but is to-day one of perhaps the half-dozen most profound, comprehen- sive and instructive papers on that complicated sub- ject now in print in any language. Uj)on his admission to the bar, Mr. Tilden opened an office in Pine Street, in the city of New York, which will be remembered by his acquaintances of that period as a favorite resort for the leading Demo- crats, whether resident or casually on a visit to that city. In 1844, in anticipation and preparation for the election which resulted in making James K. Polk President, and Silas Wright Governor of the State of New Y^ork, Mr. Tilden, in connection with John L. O'Sullivan, founded the newspaper called the Daily News, by far the ablest morning journal that had up to that time been enlisted in the service of the Demo- cratic party. Its success was immediate and complete, and to its efficiency was largely due the success of the Democratic ticket that year. As Mr. Tilden did not propose to enter into journalism as a career, and had embarked in this enterprise merely for its bearing upon the Presidential campaign of 1844, he retired from it soon after the election, presenting his entire interest in the property to his colleague. In the fall of 1845 he was sent to the Assembly from the city of New Y'ork, and while a member of that body was elected to the convention for remodeling the Constitution of the State, which was to commence its sessions a few weeks after the Legislature adjourned. In both of these bodies he was a conspicuous author- ity, and left a permanent impression upon the legis- lation of the year, and especially upon all the new constitutional provisions afl'ecting the finances of the State and the management of its system of canals. In this work he was associated, by personal and political sympath}^ most intimately with Governor Wright, Michael Hoff"man and with Azariah C. Flagg, then the controller of the State, who had all learned to value very highly his counsel and co-operation. The defeat of Mr. Wright in the fall of 1846, and 1] VIEWS AT •"GRAYSTONE. YONKERS, N. Y. THE BENCH AND BAR. 555 the coolness which had grown up between the friends of President Folk and the friends of the hite President Van Buren, resulted fortunately for Mr. Tilden, if not for the country, in withdrawing his attention from politics and concentrating it upon his profession. He inherited no fortune, but depended upon his own ex- ertions for a livelihood. Thus far his labor for the State, or in his profession, had not been lucrative, and, de- spite his strong tastes and pre-eminent qualifications for political life, he was able to discern at that early period the importance, in this country at least, of a pecuniary independence for the successful prosecu- tion of a ])()litical career. With an assiduity and a i concentration of energy which has characterized all the transactions of his life, he now gave himself up to his profession. It was not many years before he be- came as well known at the bar as he had before been known as a jiolitician. His business developed rapidly, and though he continued to take more or less interest in political mattei-s, they were not allowed after 1857 to interfere with his professional duties. From that time until 1869, when he again conse- crated all his jiersonal and professional energies to the reform of the municipal government of New York City, a period of about twenty years, his was nearly or quite the largest and most lucrative practice in the country conducted by any single barrister. During what may be termed the professional parts of his career he has associated his name imperishably with some of the most remarkable forensic struggles of our time. It was, however, duringthis period of Mr. Tilden's life, in which he was devoting himself almost exclusively to his profession, that his name figures prominently in one of the most important political transactions in American history. The convention held in 1848 at Baltimore for the selection of a Presidential ticket to be supported by the Democratic party presumed to deny to the regular delegates from New York State, of whom Mr. Tilden was one, admission to their body upon equal terms with 'the delegates from other States, assigning as a reason that the convention which chose them had declared that the immunity from slavery contained in the Jeffersonian ordinance of 1787 should be applied to all the Territories of the Northwest, so long as they should remain under the government of Congress. Mr. Tilden was selected by his colleagues of the delegation to make their report to i their constituents, — a report which helps to make the Utica Convention of June, 1848, one of the most mo- mentous in the history of the country. "With this intolerant proscription of the New York Deinocnvcy began the disastrous schism which was destined to rend in twain both the great ( parties of the country and practically to annihilate the political organi- 1 zation which had given a wise and beneficent government to the country for half a century. Then, too, and there were laid the foundations of the political conglomerate, which in 18(i(i acipiired, and for a (juarter of a century retained, uninterrupted control of our Federal (iovernment. . . . " Just twenty-eight years after the delegate from Xc-w York, who had been selected by his colleagues for the purjwse, broke to their outraged constituents the story of their State's humiliation, that same delegate received the suffrages of a large majority of his countrymen for the high- est honoi' in their gift ; and to-day, through that delegate's influence, another citizen of New York who was nominated by a Democratic Na- tional Convention, which imposed no sectional tests, and who was elected without the vote of a single slaveholder, becomes the chief magis- trate and most honored citizen of the Kepublic. 'The wheel is come full circle.' and the bones of the Democratic party that were broken ujwn the cross of slavery in 1848, now, after an interval of thirty-six years, are once more knit together, and the tra The four years from 18t)9 to 1878 were mainly de- voted by Mr. Tilden to the overthrow of what was known as the Tweed Ring, which had thoroughly de- bauched every branch of the New York City govern- ment, legislative, executive and judicial, and was threatening the State government also with its foul embrace. "The total surrender of my professional business during that period," he has siiid in one of his published conimunications, " the nearly absolute withdrawal of attention from my private afl'airs, and from all enterprises in which I am interested, have cost nie a loss of actual income, which* with e.xpenditures and contributions the contest has required, would be a respectable endowment of a public charity. " I do not speak of these things," he adds, "to regret them. In my opinion, no instrumentality in human society is so potential in its influ- ence on the well-being of mankind as the governmental machinery which administers justice and makes and executes laws. No benefaction of private benevolence could he so fruitiul in benefits as the rescue of" this machinery from the perversion which had made it a means of con- spiracy, fraud and crime against the rights ami the most sacred interests of a great community." When Mr. Tilden thus wrote he had not exper- ienced nor could he have foreseen the legal consum- mation of his labors in the arrest, imprisonment or flight of all the parties who, only a few months before, seemed to hold the wealth and power of the Empire State in the hollow of their hands, nor the condemna- tion of Tweed to the striped jacket and cell of a felon, nor the recovery of verdicts which promised to restore to the city treasury many millions of ill-gotten plun- der. Nor could he have foreseen, among the most direct and immediate results of his labors for the purifica- tion of the New York City and State governments, his election as Governor in the fall of 1874, by a ma- jority of more than fifty thousand over General Dix, the Republican candidate. The talents and jniblic virtues which, as a municipal reformer, won the confidence of the people of his na- tive State and made him Governor, on this new and wider theatre won the confidence and admiration of the nation and made him its choice by a considerable popular majority for the Presidency in 1876. It was not, however, in the order of Providence that he j or the people were to enjoy the legitimate fruits of this latter victory. When Congress convened in the winter of 1876- 77, and proceeded to discharge its constitutional I " Writings and Life of Samuel J. Tilden,'' edited by John Bigelow. Pub., Harper 4 Brothers, 1885. 556 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. duty of counting the electoral votes for President and Vice-President, it appeared that there were one hun- dred and eighty-four uncontested electoral votes for Samuel J. Tilden for President and for Thomas A. Hendricks for Vice-President, one hundred and six- ty-five uncontested electoral votes for Rutherford B. Hayes for President and William A. Wheeler for Vice-President, and twenty votes in dispute. One hundred and eighty-five votes were necessary for a choice; consequently, one additional vote to Tilden and Hendricks would have elected them, while twen- ty additional votes were required for the election of the rival candidates. The whole election, therefore, depended upon one electoral vote. This gave to the mode of counting the vote an importance which it had never possessed at any of the twenty- one previous elections in the history of our govern- ment. The provisions of the Constitution relating to the mode of counting the vote were sufficiently vague to furnish a pretext for some diversity of opinion upon the subject, wherein the temptation to find one was so great. A majority of the Senate being Republi- cans and a majority of the House of Representatives being Democrats, that the Senate would not agree to to count any one of these twenty votes for Tilden and Hendricks was assumed; and to avoid a conflict of jurisdiction, which was thought by some to threaten the peace of the country, a special tribunal, to consist of members of Congress and of the Supreme Court, fifteen in number, was created, upon which the duty of counting the electoral vote was devolved by an act of Congress. One of the membei's of this tribunal was classified as an Independent, seven as Republicans and seven as Democrats. The Republicans voted to count all the votes of the three contested States for Hayes, and the Indei)endent, voted with them, and the candidate elected to the Presidency by a consid- erable popular majority was compelled to give place to the candidate of a minority. The circumstances under which Mr. Tilden was deprived of the Presidency made it inconvenient, in- deed impossible, to obey the counsels and warnings of declining health to lay down the leadership of the great party whose unexampled wrong was represented in his person, until he could surrender it into the hands of its proper national rejiresentatives. As soon, however, as the National Democratic Convention as- sembled in 1880, he felt constrained to address to the chairman of the New York delegation the memorable letter in which he proclaimed his well-considered in- tention to retire from public life, for the labors of which he had long felt his health and strength were unequal. In 1884 he was obliged to repeat his resolu- tion, to prevent his nomination by the delegates to the National Convention, who were almost unanimously chosen because of their avowed partiality for Mr. Til- den as their candidate, notwithstanding his impaired and failing health. Finding it impossible to obtain his consent to run, the convention accepted a candi- date of his choice from the State which he had served so long and faithfully, and his choice was ratified by the nation at the general election. Mr. Tilden is now enjoying the repose he has so fially earned, and such health as repose only could con- fer, at his princely home of Greystone on the banks of the Hudson, now the pilgrim's shrine of the reinstated party, which Jefferson planted and which Jackson and Van Buren watered. "He is one of tlie few surviving statesmen who had the good fortune to receive early political training in the golden age of the Democratic party, when public measures were thoroughly tested by the Constitution and by public opinion, and when by ample debate the voters of the whole nation were educated, not only to embrace, but also to com- prehend, the principles upon which their government was conducted,— a training to which his subsequent political career bears continual testi- mony. Whatever heresies of doctrine have crept into our public policy since those days, the responsibility for them will not rest with him. In all the papers and speeches with which from time to time he has endeav- ored to enlighten his countrymen, it will be difficult to find a line or a thought not in harmony with the teachings of the eminent statesmen who, during the first fifty years of our national history, traced the limits and defined the functions of constitutional Democracy in America. From that epoch to this there has been scarcely a tALrOLM SMITH. The ancestors of Mr. Smith have been citizens of Westchester County for many generations i)ast. His great grandfather, John Smith, was a tenant and afterward the owner of one of the farms of tiie Manor of Phillipsburg. This homestead, situated about two miles east of Sing Sing, he left by will to his son Caleb Smith, who died in 1832, at an advanced age. The latter married Elizabeth Sherwood, and they were the parents of a large family. One of their sons Isaac C. Smith, was born in 1797, and married Maria, daughter of (ieorge Titlar, who came when a child to this country from the north of Ireland, was a soldier during the Revolution, and one of the company who laid the great chain across the Hudson River at West Point. Mr. Smith died in 1877, leaving three chil- dren, — George T., Cornelia (wife of James T. Stratton, of Oakland, Cal., late United States Surveyor-Gen- eral of that State), and J. Malcolm Smith, who was born in New Y'^ork, March 11, 1823, while his parents were residing temporarily in that city, but removed with them to Sing Sing in early infancy. His father was desirous of giving him a collegiate education, and with that view he attended the preparatory school at Middletown, Conn., and subsequently entered the Wesleyan University. Here he con- tinued till he passed the sophomore examination, when he was compelled to leave college on account of ill health, and was principally engaged in out- door pursuits until pa.st the age of thirty. During this time he studied law, was admitted to the bar and established his practice at Sing Sing, where he re- mained till 1868. While a resident Mr. Smith was elected one of the trustees of the village, and was also elected justice of the peace for three successive terms. He was for a number of years one of the loan com- missioners for Westchester County, and for five years prior to 1867 clerk of the Board of Supervisors. At the general election in 1867 he was made county clerk of Westchester County and removed to White Plai ns in 1868. Finding the records and business of the important office, to which he had been chosen, in great confusion, as reported by a committee of the Board of Supervisors, he, upon taking possession of the ofiice, at once devoted himself to the task of bringing order out of comparative chaos. So well did he perform his duties that at the expiration of his term he was re-elected, and in 1873 was chosen for a third term without opposition, his election being especially favored by the most prominent lawyers of the county without regard to party ties. Upon his retirement from office the following appeared in one of the leading newspapers of the county, reflect- ing, in substance, notices which appeared in nearly all the county papers: "J. Slalcolm Smith. Esq., whose third term of office as County Clerk of this County expired on the fli-st of the present month, carries with him, in retiring from his official labors, the respect, good opinion and confidence of our entire community ; and our Board of Supervisors, on the eve of his retiring from the office which he hits so long and soahly titled, took occasion to give public and official cei tification to the correct and efficient manner in which he has discharged the various and important duties of the office during the past nine years, in the unanimous adop- tion of the Report of its Standing Committee on County Clerk." The rei)ort of the Supervisors' Committee referred to closes as follows : " Your Committee wotild report that at the reque.st of J. Malcolm Smith, the present County Clerk, who.se term of office is about to expire, they have made a thorough investigation ae to the present condition of the books, papers and records of the office, and find the minutes of all the Courts duly recorded ; the Registers of Actions and Special Proceed- ings written up to date and properly inde.\ed ; the Judgments docketed in the most plain and neat manner; the Lis Pendens, Sherifl""8 Certifi- cates, Assignments, &c., all recorded and plainly indexed ; and every- thing relating to the papers and records of the olfice showing that regularity and order i)revail throughout, and that no unfinished busi- ness will be left to he performed by Mr. Smith's successor in office. '•Mr. Smith has always been a Democrat, and for twenty years prior to his retirement from office held a prominent position iu the councils of his party." Since his retirement he has been engaged in the practice of law in White Plains, devoting himself more especially to examination of titles and matters of law pertaining to real estate. He has been for forty years connected with the Methodist Episcopal Church, aud is well known as an active and influ- ential member, largely aiding financially and by judi- cious counsel in the erection of churches, both in Sing Sing and White Plains. He has been an ex- tensive traveler in various portions of the United States and few men in this county have a wider circle of acquaintance. He married Hannah, daughter oi James McCord, of Sing Sing. They have one child. I THE BENCH AND BAR. 561 Ella, wife of Charles V. Moore, of the well-known insurance firm of W. M. Onderdonk & Co., of New York City. A few words should be added concerning his father. Captain Isaac C. Smith. Durinp; his whole life Cap- tain Sniitli was identified with the growth and busi- ness of Sing Sing. He was the builder of the steam- boat "Mount Pleasant" in 18H5 and the "Tele- graph " in 1836, and was the projector of the morning steamboat line from Sing Sing to New York. He was the builder of more than one hundred ves.sels, from a small sloop to a ship of three thousand tons. During his life he bore a part in the erection of five churches, and was known as the " father of Sing Sing Methodism," being one of the original corpora- tors of the first church of that denomination in the village, and the largest contributor towards its erec- tion. After a life of active usefulness, he died while on a visit to his son in White Plains, having reached his eightieth year. HON. .lOHX B. HASKIN. Among the political leaders of Westchester County a prominent place must be given to Hon. John B. Haskin, who is descended from a long line of true American ancestry. His grandfather, Benjamin F. Haskin, was a native of Sheffield, Massachusetts, where he was born in 17G7, and removed when a young man to Poughkeepsie, where he entered a store a.s clerk, and became partner. He married Elizabeth, daughter of Gilbert Cornwell, who lived at Nine Part- ners, and removing to New York, became largely con- nected with shipping interests, and the owner of several vessels. His children were Henry R.; Benja- min F., a sea-captain who settled in Peru, where his descendants are still found ; William E., of Daven- port, Iowa, who died in 1884, Harriet, wife of Collins; Maria, wife of Graham; Jane, wife of Casper Trumpy, now living at Greenwich, Ct.;and Caroline, wife of William Brown, of Yonkers, who died in ISS'). Henry R. Haskin, the oldest son, was born October 27, 1794, and died January 24, 1848. He was edu- cated at St. Mary's College, Maryland ; was a mid- shi])man in the War of 1812; was with Commodore Chauncey at the battle of Sackett's Harbor, and was wounded there. He was a man of good education and ability, and established business in a store on Varrick Street, New York. In 1816 he married Elizabeth, daughter of John Bussing, who lived near Williams' Bridge, and was a descendant of Aaron Russing, who came from Holland, and settled at Har- lem. He was the owner of a fiirm of four hundred acres in the Manor of Fordham, which he left to his two sons, Johannes and Petrus. It remained in the hands of their descendants for one hundred and fifty years, and a portion of it is now in Bedford Park. The children of this marriage were Henry R., who died in California ; John B. ; and William E., now treasurer of the Board of Excise in New York. Af- ter the death of Mi-s. Haskin, Mr. Haskin was mar- ried a second time, to Ann, daughter of Benjamin F. Lowe, and they had two children — Harriet, wife of R. Ridgly Wheatly, of New York, and Benjamin F., a member of the Excise Board of New York, who died, greatly lamented by his many friends, March 1, 1884. John B. Haskin, the second son, was born at the Mansion House, in Fordham, August 27, 1821, the place of his birth being now a. portion of Woodlawn Cemetery. His mother, whose name he never fails to mention in terms of the utmost respect and affection, was a woman of great energy and determination, qualities which she transmitted to her son. His early education was received at the j)ublic school, and when fourteen years old he entered the law-office of George Wilson. His natural quickness and ability were such that in four years he was sufficiently expert to take charge of the law-office of John M. Bixby. From his earliest days he was brought in constant contact with politics and politicians, and having passed the requisite examination, he was admitted to the bar May 16, 1842, his certificate being signed by Hon. Samuel Nelson, Judge of the Supreme Court. Five years later he was elected to the office of civil justice, and held court at the corner of Bowery and Third Street, and continued in this position till 1849, when the office was abolished. He seemed naturally destined for active political life, and his influence and ability were soon felt in the councils of his party. Fortu- nately for himself and the public, he was not a man to be bound by party trammels, or to be the obsequious slave of i)arty rule. He called himself a " National Conservative Democrat," and might almost be said to be his own party. In 1848 Mr. Haskin removed from New York and settled at Fordham, near the scenes of his early childhood. The Democracy of his native county had to some extent escaped the corrujjting in- fluences which had made the party in New York a dis- grace to the city and the State. Here he came in con- tact with a class of politicians who were more able to appreciate his true position and ready to join their forces with his own. In 1850 he was elected super- visor, and was re-elected, and one of his many acts for public benefit was his successful effort to erect a free 1 bridge over Harlem River. In 1853 he was appointed corporation attorney and held office till 1856. In that year he was elected mem- ber of Congress for the Ninth District on the regular Democratic ticket. It was soon evident tiiat he was not the man to sit on a back seat. His first speech attracted at once the attention of the House, being made in opposition to the attempt of Alexander H. Stephens to disgrace Admiral Hiram Paulding for causing the arrest of the noted filibuster, William H. Walker. This sj)ee<'h marked Mr. Haskin as one of the acconiplij^lu'd orators of the House. In the fierce ' political strife which followed the attempt to introduce 562 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. slavery into the Territory of Kansas, he took at once j a jDrominent position, and was one of the first to raise his voice against the Lecompton fraud, among the j most active of the adherents of Senator Stephen A. Douglass, and an untiring organizer of the Democrats in the House against the administration. As a mat- ter of course, a man who ventured to kick over the traces of party discipline was speedily denounced as a traitor to his party, but his opposition to Buchanan has been more than justified by the impartial verdict of history. In 1858 Mr. Haskin was an Independent candidate for Congress, his opponent being Gouverneur Kemble, of Cold Spring. This was probably the most exciting political contest ever witnessed in the district, and resulted in the election of Mr. Haskin by a majority of thirteen votes. His nature showed itself when he stated from his seat in Congress, " I came here with no party collar on my neck." His independence was too plain to be misunderstood, and an attack upon him in the personal organ of President Buchanan was answered by him in an able speech on the floor of the House, in which his position and relation to the Democratic party were fully explained. " I am a Democrat, — a Democrat in essence, in substance, and not in mere form ; Democracy, according to my read- j ing, is the rule of the people under the law." In the Thirty-sixth Congress he was chairman of the Com- mittee on Public Expenditures, and member of the Committee on Public Printing, and organized the re- search into current corruption known as the "Covodc Investigation." Among his most intimate friends was Senator Broderick, of California, who had been his early schoolmate, and the friendship then begun continued till the day when theSenator fell, the victim of a duel occasioned by political animosity. It devolved upon Mr. Haskin to deliver a fitting tribute to the memory of his friend, which was a masterpiece of pathetic eloquence. His last speech in Congress was delivered February 23,1861. It was a characteristically bold and clear review of the agitation which led to the great crisis in our history ; expressed his belief that the perilous condition of the country was directly traceable to the conduct of President Buchanan, and contained a scathing denunciation of the treasonable acts of his Cabinet. During the course of the war a weaker man in his position would have been a Copperhead, but in Mr. Haskin the Union found a strong supporter. In 1863 he was elected supervisor of West Farms, and con- ducted with success the measures for raising troops and a.ssisting the government in its efforts to subdue rebellion. Prominently identified with all local im- provements, his most active efforts were devoted to the establishment of the public school in his district on a sure foundation. In the face of bitter opposi- tion on the part of many of the wealthy men in the vicinity, he succeeded in procuring the erection of the present school building at Fordham, at a cost of seventy thousand dollars, which must ever remain a monument to his energy and public spirit. Mr. Haskin married Jane, daughter of Peter Val- entine, a representative of one of the oldest families in the county. Their children are Elizabeth, wife of E. V. Welsh ; Emma, wife of Colonel J. Milton Wyatt ; John B., Jr., Adele Douglass, wife of Joseph Murray, Jr.; and Mary. The estate of Mr. Haskin, at Fordham, though now a part of the great city, has not yet lost its rural beauty. Here, surrounded by all that can make life enjoyable, he passes his days in the society of his family and friends. The visitor will find there as his host one who is thoroughly versed in the ways of the world; and whose intimate acquaintance with politics and politicians has made the name " Tuscarora Has- kin " one of the best known in Westchester County. As a politician Mr. Ha.skin has been remarkably successful, but the secret of his success and influence may be stated in a few words. Utterly fearless in the expression of his views, his friends know him as one upon whom they can depend, while his enemies find in him a man who can neither be frightened nor cajoled. A weak politician of an inferior grade will truckle to his adversaries and strive to conciliate by unworthy means. Mr. Haskin is the type of a poli- tician who boldly defies his opjjonents and challenges them to a contest which they generally have the pru- dence to avoid. Among the notable instances of his traits may be mentioned his fearless letter to the authorities of the St. John's College, of Fordliain, representatives of a power to which weaker politi- cians would have yielded with obsequious reverence, while his bold and scathing rebukes of many of the prominent politicians of the present time are too well known to require mention, and his firm self-reliance has shown by its success the truth of the saying, "They can concjuer who believe they can." MATHIAS liANTA. Mr. Banta, who is among the best known jurists of Westchester County, and by his activity in the es- pousal of every just cause has brought himself prominently before its people, both in i)olitical and social life, was born in the city of New York, October 3, 1828. He was one of ten children and the only son of Solomon Banta, who married Maria Roome, of New Jersey. While quite young his father sent him to Public School No. 3, in the Ninth Ward, New York City, from which he graduated. He then attended the private school of Mr. Starr, in Amos Street, leaving it at the age of sixteen to enter the University of the City of New York. In 1848, after his graduation from college, he entered the law-oflice of David E. Wheeler a-s manag- ing clerk, remaining in this position till the death of his employer, in 186'J, when the business was divided, THE BENCH AND BAR. 563 the real estate portion of it falling into his own haiuls. Mr. Banta has since continued to manage the busi- ness. By his faithful attention to the interests of his clients and his sivill in the inanageinent of the aflaii-s which thoy liavc placed in his hands, he has accumu- lated for himself an extended and hicrative practice, which is continually increasing. In 1870, after a long residence in New York, he re- moved to Mamaroneclc, where he resides at present. From his arrival in Westchester County he has deeply interested himself in its politics. Being a Democrat, he immediately identified himself with his party in IMamaroneck, and was elected in 1877 super- visor of the town, an ofiice he continues to hold. Tiie liberal course pursued by him in the County Board so won tiie apj)roval of his jtarty that in 188') lie was made their nominee for surrogate, and received a large majority of the votes cast at the election. A pre- viously rendered decision, however, to the effect that no vacancy existed, de- prived him of the ofiice. In 1849 Mr. Banta mar- ried Miss Eliza Gedney. They have three children, — Hannah M., wife of William A.Turner; Ever- etta, wife of F. S. Sheldon ; and Eloise J. He is an attendant of tlie Methodist Church, of Maniaroneck, and is high- ly respected in the com- munity as an honorable and useful eitizen. HOX. ERNEST HALL. Hon. Ernest Hall, prom- inent as a member of the bar, and a judge of the City Court of New York, was born in London, England, October 24, 1844. His father, Henry B. Hall, was a landscape and portrait engraver, came to America with his family in 1850 and settled at Woodstock, in Morrisania. He after- wards removed to George Street, near the Boston road, where he died in 1884. Judge Hall attended the old Public School No. 3, on Fordham Avenue (now Third Avenue), near One Hundred and Sixty-ninth Street, from 1851 to 1858, when he graduated. He then obtained a position in the well-known publishing house of the Putnams, and remained until 186(1. In the fall of that year he began the study of law in the office of Henry Spratley, of Morrisania. He continued there until 1861, when he entered the office of Carpentier & Beach, in New York, and remained until May, 18()4. In 1863 he joined the Seventy-first Regiment New York Militia during the Gettysburg campaign, and returned at the close of the riots in New York. He resumed his law studies until August 24, 1864, when he joined the navy as a landsman, and w;uj detailed as clerk on hoard the receiving ship in Brooklyn Navy- Yard. He was afterwards on the United States steamer " Mohican," commanded by Daniel Annnen, now rear admiral on the retired list, and was at- tached to the North Atlantic Squadron. While on this vessel he was clerk to the executive officer. He was engaged in both battles of Fort Fisher, N. C, in December, 1864, and January, 1865, spent the winter on the Ogeechee River, in Georgia, and assisted in the dismant- ling of Fort McAllister, which had previously been captured by Sher- man's army. He came North in March, and re- ceived his discharge in Boston, May 24, 1865. He then entered the law school of the University of the City of New York in the senior class, graduated June 17, 1866, and was admitted to the bar. He established an office for the practice of law in Morrisania, which he continued till 1877, when he removed to New York, and was elected judge of the City Court November, 1881, a posi- tion which he still holds. From 1869 to 1873 he was a member of the board of trustees of the town of Morrisania. In the latter year he was appointed counsel to the corporation, and served in that capacity until the time of the annexa- tion to the city of New York. He was subsequently appointed by E. Delafield Smith, then corporation counsel of the city of New York, to attend to all suits then pending affecting the annexed district, and was continued in this position by William C. Whitney, the successor of Mr. Smith. He was also counsel of the Board of Excise, of the German Savings Bank and of the Fire Department of Morrisania. He is a member of Post Lafayette, of the Grand Army of the Republic, and assisted in its organization. Judge Hall's brothers, as well as himself, were actively engaged in the late war. Henry B. Hall was major of the Sixth New York Artillery, fought at the 564 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. battle of Bull Run, was wounded at Brandy Station in 1863, and was discharged from service upon re- covering from his wound. Charles B. Hall was a member of the Seventy-first Regiment in 1861, and afterward joined the Ninety -fifth Regiment New York Volunteers, and his brother Alfred wasamember of the Seventy-first Regiment in 18()2-63. Judge Hall has four sisters — Annie, wife of Edmund H. Knight (she died in 1858, leaving three children); Emily, wife of William Moniberger ; Alice and Eliza, both unmar- ried. Judge Hall married Charita, daugliter of Cyprian Tallient. Their children are Charita, Alma and Edna. He is well known as an able and distinguished member of the bar, and is especially noted for the clearness and perspicuity with which he delivers his charges to the jury. Gifted with a voice of remark- able power, his enunciation aud his reasoning arc alike perfect. Every point of the subject is laid down in so careful a manner as to render it perfectly plain to the most common intellect, and with an impar- tiality which leaves no ground for the charge of in- tentional bias on either side of the case. As an active and energetic politician, he is one concerning whom it is safe to prophesy still higher positions in the future. The brothers of Judge Hall constitute the well- known firm of H. B. Hall's Sons, steel engravers, and their name is known in connection with the finest specimens of that art to be found in this country. HON. SAMUEL AVILLIAM JOHNSOX. Mr. Johnson is a great-great-grandson of the dis- tinguished American clergyman. Dr. Samuel John- son, who was born in Guilford, Conn., October 14, 1696, and died at Stratford, in the same State, June 6, 1772. His son, William Samuel Johnson, was first presi- dent of Columbia College, a member of the conven- tion that framed the Constitution of the United States and the first delegate in the Senate of the United States from the State of Connecticut.' A grandson of William Samuel Johnson, was aNew York lawyer of i)rominence and was a mend^er of the Senate of the State of New York. He married Miss Lau- ra Wolsey, sister of President Wolsey, of Yale College. Their second child and oldest son, Samuel William, was born in the city of New Y^'ork, October 27, 1828. After a preparatory course in private schools of the city he entered Princeton College, graduating in 1849. He then entered the Law School, Cambridge, Mass., and after a full course graduated in 1851. He after- ward entered the law-office of District Attorney N. I For a full description of hie life, see Appleton's Encyclopaedia ; also "Life of Dr. Samuel .Johnson," by E. E. Beardsley (New York, 1874). Bowditch Blunt, remaining till 1852, when he was ad- mitted to the bar. Immediately after admission Mr. Johnson removed to Cattaraugus County, N. Y^, where he remained for thirteen years in charge of a large landed interest. In 1865 he retired from active life, removing at the same time to Rye Neck, where he has since resided. He has been active in the politics of the county ever since his arrival in it. He early connected himself with the Democratic party in the home of his choice and has held several important political positions. In 1871 he was appointed by Governor John T. Hoffman commissioner-general and chief of ord- nance for the State of New Y'ork. He has been nine times elected supervisor of the town of Rye and was for two years chairman of the board. For three years he was a member of Assembly from the Second Dis- trict of Westchester County. It is a remarkable fact that he is the fourth member of the family in the di- rect line who has represented a constituency in State Legislatures. He also interested himself in military affairs. From 1853 to 1872 he held commissions from the State of New Y''ork, the last one being that of brigadier-general. He has been prominent in club life and is at pres- ent a member of the Manhattan, University and St. Nicholas Clubs, of New York City. He is also a director in the North River Fire Insurance Company and a trustee of the Port Chester Savings Banks. He married ]\Iiss Frances Ann Sanderson, of New York, who died at her home in Mamaroneck in 1879. Their only living child, William Samuel, is a member of the bar in New York City, and resides with his father. Mr. Johnson is a highly respected and useful citi- • zen and his liberal spirit and cordial disposition has made him many warm and lasting friendships. HON. G. HILTON SCRIBNER. The ancestors of the family of which Mr. Scribner is an honored representative were among the early settlers of Salisbury, N. H., and the name is fre- quently found in the annals of that town. That of Samuel Scribner occurs in 1754, and during the following year he, in company with one of his neighbors, was taken prisoner by the Indians and carried to Canada, where he was sold as a captive, but was subsequently ransomed by the colonial govern- ment. In 1756 he joined the regiment of Colonel Nathan Meserve, which was raised for the Crown Point expedition, and served from May to December of that year. In 1757 he was a soldier in the regi- ment of Colonel Thomas Tash, and in the following year appears as one of the regiment raised by Colonel John Hart. The Revolution found in him a man ready for the hour, and, though exempt by age, he was one of the first to enlist in the regiment com- manded by Colonel John Stark, which took an active N THE BENCH AND BAR. 565 part in tlie battle of Bimkor Hill. Among the list of soldiers in the town of Salisbury, May 27, 177t), are tbfi names i>f Edward, Ebene/er, Benjamin and Jon- atiian Seribner. David Seribner, son of Ebenezer and p;rands()n of yanuiel, was born May 12, 17G7, and was tbc father of thirteen eliildren, — David, Hannah, Sarah, Eben. Sewall 15., Silas, Ruth, Jaeob D., Jonathan, Albert G., Hannah D., Alfred and Almira H. Sewall B. Seribner was born March 12, 1793, and removed from his native place (Andover, N. H.) to Monroe County, N. Y., in ISlli. At that time the present eity of Kochester was a mere hamlet, and Mr Seribner was among the pioneers in what is now one of the most prosperous portions of the State. In 1821 he married Clarissa De Wayne Hilton> (laughter of David Hilton, who was descended from a noted line of English ancestry, whose family records are unbroken from June 23, 1295, to the present time. The children of this marriage were Gilbert Hilton Seribner, Alsada, Arveda (wife of William E. Stick- land, of Rochester), Albert S. (who died in 18r)2), Mary (wife of Van Buren Denslow), Celesta (de- ceased) and Celia M. Gilbert Hilton Seribner was born in Ogden, Mon- roe County, N. Y., June 23, 1831, and his early edu- cation was received iu the common schools of his na- tive place, which offered exceptional advantages. He subsequently became a student at the Genesee Wes- leyan Seminary, at Lima, N. Y., and, after remaining there two years, entered college at Oberlin, where he received the highest honors for his thoroughness and originality. At the close of his collegiate course, in 1853, he went to New York and began life in the great city without friends or accjuaintance, and with little to encourage him, but an amount of determination and energy with which he could not fail to work his way. Commencing the study of law in the office of Hon. Daniel B. Taylor who enjoyed a large practice and was the possessor ot one of the largest law libraries in the city, the young student, by indefatigable labor, soon made himself useful in his chosen [irofession, and, iu 1855, was ad- mitted to the bar and soon after called to i)ractice in the United States Courts as proctor, solicitor and ad- vocate. Rising rapidly in his profession, his prudence and ability soon gained him a large and lucrative practice, and he was frecpiently retained as counsel for many monied corporations and large estates. In 1862 he was one of the organizers of the North Amer- ica Life Insurance Company of New York, of which he became a director and counsel, and, after long and arduous labor in collating and analyzing facts and statistics in relation to travel and accidents, framed a bill, which was passed by the Legislature, allowing that company to insure against accidents to travelers. This was the first authority granted iu this country for accident insurance. Mr. Seribner came to Yonkers in 1858, and since that time his life and career have been identified with the history of Westchester County. Upon coming to Yonkers he built a house on Woodworth Avenue, near Locust Street, there being at that time very (ew dwellings in that vicinity. His iiome was sur- rounded by a beautiful locust grove. He subsecjuently moved to a residence at " Hillside," near the corner of liroadway and High Street. His present residence, •• Inglehurst," was purchased in the spring of 1880, and from its elevated position commands one of the finest views of the Hudson River. It is also a landmark, being situated at the extreme north bounds of the • Lemuel Wells estate," which embraced the greater l)art of the thickly-settled portion of the city of Yonkers. The first official position held by Mr. Seribner was that of village trustee, in 1863. At that time, with a few others, he organized a very thorough temperance relorm. Born of Whig j>arentage, he early attached himself to that party, and remained a member while it had an existence. He attended the convention which nominated Fremont, iu 1856, and since that time has been an able and earnest supporter of the Republican i)arty. In 1863 he was made chairman of the Coutity Committee. It was due to his ownership and efforts that the Statesinnn, the leadingRepublican paper in the county, was established. In addition to his extensive law practice, he was for a time the pres- ident of the Palisades Bank of Yonkers, and also a director of several large corporations. In 1868 he retired from the practice of law and with bis family made a long tour iu Europe. He made a second trip in 1870, was present at the declaration of the Franco-Prussian War, and enjoyed special oppor- tunities of visiting the armies of the contending powers. Previous to his departure for Europe he had re- ceived and declined a nomination for State Senator, but upon his return, in the fall of 1870, was elected member of the Assembly by a very large majority, and was the first member other than a Democrat who had been elected from the district for over thirty years. The weight of his ability and influence was soon felt and he soon became a leader in the Legis- lature and in his party, devoting much of his time and etlbrt to opposing the measures of the "Tweed Ring," then in the height of its power, but destined to a sudden and disiistrous fall. In March, 1871, he wiis instrumental in organizing the Young Men's State Republican Association, the object of which was to unite discordant elements and end the strifes which had impaired the usefulness of the party. This or- ganization very naturally chose Mr. Seribner for its president, and having shown himself a competent and faithful leader, he was nominated by acclamation at the State Convention in Syracuse, in 1871, for Secre- tary of State, a nomination which was signally con- firmed at the succeeding election by a majority of over twenty thousand. Soon after the close of the Legis- 566 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. lature of 1871 the representatives of the insurance, banking and other corporate interests of the State united in a complimentary tribute to Mr. Scribner for his intelligent, able and successful opposition to un- just legislation while a member of Assembly. The ceremony of the presentation of a service of silver plate took place in the chambers of the Board of Un- derwriters in New York, and an address engrossed on parchment, signed by and presented on behalf of the presidents of more than fifty of the monied institu- tions of New York, was not only a compliment to Mr. Scribner's character, but a certification that he had performed his public services in an acceptable manner. Notwithstanding the engrossing cares of an active political and business life, he has never permitted his tastes for literature and art to become dull or enfee- bled. Often organizingaud always connected with one or more literary circles, he has not suffered his love of learning to be stifled by the cares and responsibilities of his profession or the routine of daily labor. To him is due the credit of establishing the Bancroft Society of New Y^ork, and also " The Society o) Pundits," a literary circle, which for many years con- tinued its meetings, and embraced in its membership some of the brightest men and women of the city which he had made his home. He was also for many years a trustee of the Bible Union and also of the Rochester Theological Seminary. The profound problem of the origin of life upon our planet has engrossed the attention of the greatest minds in the world of science, but still remains a question to which there seems no reply. Next to this comes the inquiry as to the place of its first manifes- tation, the determination of which would appear equally hopeless. Devoting his leisure time and thought to this and kindred subjects, Mr. Scribner has embodied his theories and the results of his investiga- tions in a monograph entitled " Where did Life Begin?" This work, which appeared in November, 1883, immediately attracted the attention of the inves- tigating and scientific public. It is a carefully pre- pared and forcibly written treatise, having for its object the establishment of the theory that all life, both vegetable and animal, must have had its origin within the polar circles, and further, that by the cool- ing of the earth's substance, and the consequent lowering of surface temperature at the poles, all organic life has been gradually driven to the temperate and to the equatorial regions. To express an opinion as to the truth or fallacy of this theory would in this place be presumptuous, but it is sufficient to say that the hypothesis has not only been well received by the press and scholars, but has been the means of turning the attention of men of science to a closer consideration of the subject, and the discoveries that may follow may far exceed the most sanguine expec- tations of its author. Upon his retirement from political life Mr. Scribner accepted the ofiice of vice-president of the Belt Rail- road (so-called) of New York, and retained that position until 1880, when he was chosen pi-esidcnt, a position which he still holds. He is also connected with many associations of asocial and charitable nature, being a member of the Union League Club, president of the Skin and Cancer Hospital of New York, an institution which has done much to relieve human suffering; a member of both the British and the American Associations for the Advancement of Sci- ence, and trustee of St. John's Hospital in Yonkers. He married Sarah Woodbury, daughter of Hon. James Osgood Pettengill of Rochester, who, as a leg- islator, and as an officer and patron of the Rochester Theological Seminary and other institutions of learn- ing, is well known in Western New York. His father. Captain James Pettengill, came from Salisbury, N. H., and settled at Ogden, Monroe ^County, in the early part of the present century. The ancestors of the various families of this name were four brothers, Matthew, David, Andrew and Benjamin, who came from Yorkshire, England, in 1640, and settled in Newburyport, Mass., whence they removed to Salis- bury. The mother of Mrs. Scribner was Emeline, daughter of Manlius G. Woodbury, who was an early settler and was made alderman in the first charter election in the city of Rochester. Mr. Scribner has six surviving children, — Gilbert Hilton, Jr., Howard, Florence, Marion, Marguerite and Osgood Pettengill. CHAUNCEY SMITH. Phillip Smith was born in Connecticut, March 15, 1774, and married Sally Smith November 23, 1799. She was a granddaughter of Benjamin Stebbins, who came from England and settled in Deerfield, Mass., and was probably the ancestor of the families of that name in this country. Phillip and Sally Smith lo- cated shortly after their marriage at Bedford, West- chester County, N. Y., and were members of the old Episcopal Church of that place. They were parents of eight children, of whom Cliauncey Smith was the sixth and was born November 10, 1810. Bedford was then the county-seat and a place of no small importance; in fact, the principal village of the county. Mr. Smith at an early age entered the High School and academy at Bedford, which was an insti- tution of note, second to none in the State, and in- cluded among its pupils Hon. William H. Robertson, Hon. James W. Husted and many others of distinc- tion. A short time after graduating he studied law, and was admitted to the bar January 7, 1851. He married Hannah, daughter of John P. Horton, of New Castle, Westchester County, whose wife was Elizabeth Fowler, both descended from old West- chester County families. Elizabeth was a first cousin of Isaac Van Wart, who was one of the captors of Major Andre. Mr. Smith moved to White Plains and was appointed deputy THE BENCH AND BAR. 567 county clerk in 1847, and appointed county clerk the same year, to fill a vacancy. In January, 1847 or 1848, he was appointed agent of Sing Sing State Prison, and after leaving Sing Sing practiced law in White Plains for several years. He removed to Morrisania shortly after the settle- ment of the new village, about tliirty years ago, and opened a law-ofticc where he continued successfully the practice of his profession up to the winter of 1877, when he was compelled to give up business on account of a paralytic stroke. He was an old-school type of a Christian gentleman, highly resi)ected in all the walks of life, and active in the true interests of the society and community in which he lived. He was inti- mately acquainted with, and highly respected by. the men who were first con- nected with the growth and prosperity of Mor- risania, such as Nicholas McGraw, Jordan L. Mott) Gouverneur, Henry and William H. Morris, Rob- ert H. Elton, Hon. Silas D. Giftbrd and many others and was well known throughout the county. He was naturally of a retiring disposition, and altliough often urged to accept i)ul)lic otHce, he refused. He continued an invalid from 1S77 lo his death, which occurred December 25, 1883, at the homestead in which he had resided for more than twenty-five years. He left two daughters and one son, W. Stcbbins Smith, who is a member of the bar, in active prac- tice, particularly in the counties of V ^^Z'-^^C-'Z^'T^ " and immediate compliance with the Law of the Legislature passed the last Session. The Physicians aflforesaid formed themselves into a Society to be known and called hereafter by the name and style of the Medical Sociely uf Ihe County of Westchester. Upon Motion Doct'. A. McDonald, of the white plains, was Elected president of the Society Pro tempore, and upon said motion Doctr. JIatsou Smith, of New Rochelle, was Elected Secretary thereof. " The Society, Pleased with the present progress and deslreous that the Boanl shall hereafter exist upon the most fair and respectable terms: and that the Physicians of the County shall indiscriminately receive an invi- tation to unite with the present members and to encourage this Laud- able dissign." (Here ends the firet page.) " Jtesolred upon motion that the following resolution be inserted in the Ditnbnnj Journal and Mount Pleasant liegisler: " Kesolred upon motion the Physicians of Westchester County be in- discriminately informed that it is the intention and hearty wish of the Members of the Society that there may be a iverfect union of the Profes sion of Physic within the County for the purpose of establishing the Practice upon a liberal and satisfactory Plan, that there may be a due observance of the law passed at the last session of the Legislature of the State : And that an oppertunity may be given for such an union, the So- ciety have proposed a meeting on the l:!th Day of June ne.xt, at House of Miy'. Jesse Hally, in Bedford, and hope this mode will be considered un- eiiuiviciilly an invitation. Should any gentleman neglect the present season of uniting with the Society after the Meeting afforesaid, no gentleman can expect admission in the Society without a vote for the purpose. " I'pon motion resolved that Docf. .\. 5IcDonald, David Rodgers and Matson Smith l>e a Commit ee to propose a Constitution for this Society against the Meeting at BedfonI, which Constitution shall be Subject to Amendment. " The Board .\<^journ■d to Meet at the House of Maj' Jesse Hally, in Bedford, on the 13th Day of June next. "M.tTso.N Smith, Secretartf Pro. Tempore.^* The second meeting took place, as pro})Osed, at Major Holly's house, June 13, 1797, at which seven- teen doctors were present. After the transaction of business it was " Vminimouihj resoUed that the Rev"! Robt. Z. Whitmore be invited to preach a Sermon before the Society at their next meeting. The board .\tljourned to meet at the House of Mr. Sutton Craft, Near New Castle Church, on Tuesday, the 8th Day of .\ugust Next, at 10 o'clock A.M.' Only six members were present at the third meeting. 1 The biographies of living medical men which have been inserted in the chapter by the editor of this history are indicated by foot-notes, and the writer is in no way responsible for them. They have been prepared by various persons, ami are inserted in accordance with the wishes of the publishers of the work. 54 No mention is made concerning the sermon, and we are left in doubt as to whether it was preached or not. The fourth meeting occurred September 12, 1797, at Mr. Sutton Craft's, with eight members present. This is the first meeting at which it appears that any- thing strictly medical was proposed. " Doctor Eben- ezer White was appointed to deliver a dissertation on the utility of a Medical Society," at the next meeting. The fifth meeting took place at White Plains, "Tuesday the 31st day of October, a.d. 1797." Eight doctors were present. At this meeting the con.stitu- tion was adopted. This is given in full in the minutes. The sixth, and last meeting recorded in this little manuscript of thirteen pages was the annual meeting, which was held in Bedford on Tuesday, May 8, 1798, at which twelve members were present. Dr. Lemuel Mead " delivered a dissertation upon Physiology to the satisfaction of the Society." The records of the society from this meeting to June, 1830, are, unfortunately, lost. The society, I believe, has never failed to convene, at least annually, since its organization. At the present time it holds four sessions a year, each of which is fairly well attended. It has served the general purposes for which it was founded, though it cannot boast of having made any considerable contributions to medical literature. Its publications consist of several editions of its consti- tution and bye-laws, — a "Fee Bill," 1868; "Proceed- ings of the Society at its annual meeting, held in the village of Sing Sing June 3, 1856," 8vo., pp. 50, Sing Sing, 1857 ; and two pamphlets of " Biographical Sketches of Deceased Physicians of Westchester County, N. Y.," 8vo., pp. 52, 1861 ; " In Memoriam," 8vo., pp. 41, 1875 ; and a " List of Registered Physi- cians," 1881. The individual members of the society have made no insignificant additions to the literature of the pro- fession. Appended will be found as nearly a com- plete list of the contributions as it has been possible to make at this time. By this it will be seen that more than a hundred articles, aggregating about twenty-two hundred pages of medical matter, have been put in print by our physicians during the past sixty years. A c'HRiiNOLOGICAL LIST OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS TO MEDICAL LITERATURE MADE BY THE PHYSICIANS OF WE.-166.] 1870. " Does Maternal Mental Infiuence have any Constructive or Destruc- tive Power in the Production of Malformations or Monstrosities at any Stage of Embryonic Development ;" By G. J. Fisher, M.D., of Sing Sing, N. Y. Pp. .57. [Reprinted from vol. xxvi. of the Am. Jr. of Jii- ianitii for January, 1870. Utica, N. Y., 1870. 1 "Three Cases of Imperforate Anus, with Remarks." By J. H. Pooley. M.D. Pp. 20. [Reprinted from Am. Jr. Olist., vol. iii.. No. 1, May, 1870.] " Tent Hospitals." By J. Foster Jenkins, M.D. Pp. 25. [Trans. Am. Social Scieiice Amoc. Cand)ridge, Mass., 1S74.] "A Medico-Legal Opinion relating to the sanity of Carlton Gates." By Charles A. L«e, M.D. Pp. :iO. [Papers read before the Med.-Leg. Soc. of the City of New York. First series, p. 204-233.] 1871. '• A Contribution to the Natural History of Tubercles." By C. F. Rodeustein, iM.D. Pp. 2(\ [Read before the Yonkers Med. Association. Published at the request of Jled. Soc. of Westchester County, N. Y. Re- printed from the A'. Y. Med. Jr., Dec, 1871.] "The Late Dr. John Conolly, of Hanwell, England." By Charles .\. Lee, M.D. Pp. 12. [Reprinted from the Am. Pract. for Aug. 1871.] " Report of the Surgical Cases Treated in the St. John's Riverside Hospital, Yonkers, X. Y., during, the Year 1870." Hy J. H. Pooley M.D. Pp.19. [Reprinted from the .Y. 1', .Ue,] "Acute Milk-Poisoning," By E, F, Brush, M,D. [The Med. Rec, vol. xxii. p. 424-420.] 188:!. " Vaccination Observations and Suggestions. " ByE. F. Brush, M.D. [The Med. Rrc, vol. xxiii. p. 677-670.] " (EsophagitiB as a Disease of Infancy." By E. F. Brush, M.D. [Ibid., vol. p. xxiii. 35-37.] " Reciprocal Insanity. ' By Ralph L. Parsons, M.D. Pp. 17. [Re- printed from the Alienist and yinrologitt, Oct. 1883.] " Jury Trial of the Insane." By Ralph L. Parsons, M.D. Pp.27. [Papers read before the Med.-Legal Soc, of the City of X. Y,, 1883, p. 327-353.] 1884. " Sketch of Abfil-Walid Mohammed Ibn- Ahmed Ibn-Mohainmed Ibn- Roshd (commonly called .\verroes)." By George Jackson Fisher, M.D. Pp. 5. (Pop. tk-i. Monthlij, July, 1884, p. 43, vice-president and delegate to American Jledical As- sociation ; 18(iG, delegate to American Medical Association. On December 1, 1873, Dr. Moulton rose early, vis- ited various patients, traveled to New York City and back on professional business, and in the evening made visits to the sick in East Chester, Cooper's Cor- ners, Mamaroneck and Scarsdale, in the teeth of an easterly storm. When he reached home he was too feeble to ascend to his bed-room and remained in his office all night in his wet clothing. Pneumonia su- pervened and he died on December 7th. On the 9th a meeting cf the citizens of New Rochelle, at the Town Hall, passed resolutions of respect to his mem- ory, and similar action was taken by the Board of Education and the Huguenot Lyceum, of both of which he had been a member. He had been made an honorary member of the Westchester County Medical Society at its annual meeting in 1869, and at the meet- ing in 1872, at White Plains, he met his brother mem- bers for the last time. On the day of his funeral, busi- ness was suspended in New Rochelle, flags hung at half-mast from the public and many private buildings, the church, school and engine-house bells were tolled, the schools were dismissed and the scholars stood bare- headed in the street as the cortecje passed. No such honors had ever been paid to any private citizen of the town. Dr. Philander Stewart' was born in Dan bury, Con- necticut, June 20, 1820, and in 1840 began to study for the profession in Brookfield, the adjoining town. At the medical institution of Yale College he at- tended his first course of lectures and graduated at Jeffierson College, Philadelphia, in 18-14. After two years of practice in Roxbury, Connecticut, he came to Peekskill, and although in three years he had established remunerative professional connections there, he returned to Philadelphia to avail himself of another course of lectures and clinical observations under Prof Pancoast. Then he resumed his field of labor at Peekskill and cultivated it for upwards of thirty years, hi the year 1857 he made a trip to Europe and pursued his investigations for some time in the hospitals and medical schools of the United Kingdom and the Continent. He early attached ' Biographical sketch by Dr. James Hart Curry, read before the West- chester County !k[edical Society at its annual meeting, June IG, 1874. PROFESSION. 579 himself to the Westchester County Medical Society, in which he held every office, many of them for suc- cessive terms, and was fretjuently its delegate to the State Society. For twenty years he was a member of the latter body, making it a point never to be ab- sent from its meetings. He was also from the begin- ning a member of the American Medical Association, and made long and expensive journeys to meet its annual sessions. As an operating surgeon, for years he was among the first in all the region about him. His manipulations and operations for strangulated hernia were very fretjuent and successful, as was his management in all cases of difficult parturition. He performed many amputations. His hand was steady, his instruments many and various, his knives were sharp, his determination almost dogged, his judg- ment good and he was never taken by surprise. In auscultation and percussion he was far above the average, his touch being delicate and his ear acute. If his diagnosis was sometimes shaped too much by his preconceived notion of things, and hence may have missed the mark, it was no more so than is pecu- liar to independent minds. His prognosis was re- markably true; he had an almost intuitive knowledge of the end from the beginning. By being thrown from his carriage on May 2G, 1869, Dr. Stewart broke an arm and was stunned by a blow upon the head. Terrible paroxysms of pain in the head attacked him ; in October, 1872, he began to lose memory of names and i)laces, his penmanship became entirely changed and he wrote with difficulty. A consultation with Dr. Brovvn-Sequard on Decem- ber 3, 1873, resulted in pronouncing his case hopeless. He visited patients the next day, but was at once prostrated mentally and physically, and after ten weeks of darkness of intellect he died February 11, 1874. Dr. Havilah Mowry Sprague,' born at Scotland, Windham County, Conn., July 4, 1835, received his first tuition in medicine in the office of Dr. Hutchins. West Killingly, Conn., and in 1858 became a student under Professor A. C. Post, New York City. He at- tended the New York University Medical College, and received at the close of the session of 1859-60 the first prize for the best report of clinical cases — a post- mortem set of instruments, which were finally used at his own autopsy. He graduated March 4, 18()4, receiving also a " Cer- tificate of Honor"' for having pursued a more extend- ed course of study than is required by law. In the competitive examination for the position of " Junior Walker " in the New York Hospital, he passed an examination of superior excellence and was appointed. While here he passed the United States Army Medi- cal Examining Board, standing No. 2 in general merit out of one hundred and twenty-five candidates exam- ined (it is said that No. 1 was the son of the president - Biography by Dr. John Parsons, King's Bridge. 580 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of the Examining Board). He was commissioned assistant surgeon United States army May 28, 1861, and ordered to New Mexico, but upon his arrival in Missouri was attached to the array of General Lyon, was present when he was killed at Spring- field, and subsequently received the thanks of the commanding general for bravery and skill in attend- ance upon the wounded. Dr. Sprague was transferred to Assistant Surgeon General Wood's office, in St. Louis, where he remained until early in 1863, when he was placed in command of the Eliot General Hospital, in St. Louis. That was shortly discontinued, and he took charge of the hos- pital steamer " City of Memphis," transporting the sick and wounded of Grant's army around Vicksburg to hospitals up the river. During the final days of the siege of Vicksburg he displayed exalted bravery and fidelity in attention to the men torn with shot and shell, sent to his steamer for such aid as the surgeons could render them. In November he was ordered on duty as secretary of the Army Medical Examining Board, in New York City, and then to command of the McDougall General Hospital, at Fort Schuyler, New York Harbor. Thence he was returned to the Examining Board, and in May, 1865, resigned from the army, his name standing high on the list for promotion. He began the practice of medicine at West Farms, and in 1868 moved to Fordham. He was appointed health officer of the town of West Farms, was the first physician to the " Home for Incurables," and first physician to the " House of Rest for Con- sumptives," at Tremont. He was a member of the Westchester County Medical Society, president of the Y'onkers Medical Association, was elected a dele- gate to the American Medical Association for 1874 from the latter society, and was preparing to at- tend its meeting at Detroit, Mich., when he was arrested by death ; was a corresponding member of the American Microscopic Society, and member of the New York Pathological Society. He was deeply learned in pathology, and marvelously skilled in the use of the microscope and the preparation of speci- mens. On May 30, 1874, he died at the " House of Rest," where he had been seized with a malarious at- tack during a visit on the previous day. An autopsy was made, and his brain was found to weigh sixty ounces. John Foster Jenkins, A.M., M.D., was born at Falmouth, Mass., April 15, 1826. His preliminary course of medical reading was under Dr. Alexander M. Yedder, at Schenectady, N. Y., and in 1848 he re- ceived his degree from the Medical Department of the University of Pennsylvania. The next year he de- voted to an extra course of didactic and clinical lec- tures at the Harvard Medical School, Bosion. From May, 1849, to May, 1856, he practiced in the city of New York (except that from November, 1850, to July, 1851, he was in Europe, employing most of that time at the lectures and clinics and in the hospitals of Paris). In May, 1856, he located in Yonkere as a general practitioner of medicine, surgery and obstet- rics. In August, 1861, he entered the service of the United States Sanitary Commission as hospital visitor and associate secretary, and in May, 1863, succeeded Frederick Law Olmsted as general secretary, an oflSce which, in May, 1865, he was compelled to resign be- cause of the failure of his health in the performance of its arduous obligations. He renewed his j^ractice in Y'onkers, and, in 1869, made a second voyage to Europe. On June 21, 1877, he was elected president of the Medical Society of the State of New York, but declined to accept because of his doubt as to the legality of the meeting at which he was chosen. Other offices which he held were as follows: Physi- cian of the St. John's Riverside Hospital, at Yonk- ers ; surgeon of the Yonkers Board of Police ; senior warden of St. Paul's Parish, Yonkers ; president of the Yonkers Medical Association (of which he was one of the founders) ; president of the Westchester County Medical Society ; vice-president of the New York Obstetrical Society ; permanent member of the American Jledical Association ; member of the Amer- can Public Health Association ; corresponding Fellow of the New York Academy of Medicine ; member ot the American Social Science Association. In 1878 he spent six months at the sanitary resorts along the Mediterranean for the benefit of his health, and for nearly three years after his return kept steadily at his work. He died October 9, 1882, and, as an expres- sion of the esteem in which he was held, the Yonkers Medical Association, at its next meeting, unanimously resolved to change its name to the "Jenkins Medical Association." Dr. Jenkins was a student and an ardent lover of medical literature, both ancient and modern. He collected a large and valuable medical library. His contributions to the literature will be found in the list at the head of this chapter. Dr. Henry L. Horton was born at Croton, West- chester County, December 6, 1826, and accumulated by manual labor the money which enabled him to enter the Albany Medical College, from where he graduated in 1858, but continued to serve some time afterward as house surgeon. In 1859 he removed to Morrisania and entered upon a large and successful practice. In 1879, and again in 1881, he visited Europe, but his health, which had greatly failed, was only partially restored, and on September 13, 1884, he again sailed. At Florence, Italy, a cold, which he caught while waiting outside the railway station, de- veloped into p leurisy and ended fatally on February 24, 1885, at Rome. His remains were brought to his home and interred March 3d, at Sing Sing. Dr. Piatt Rogers Halsted Sawyer, born August 14, 1834, at Westport, N. Y., studied medicine with Dr. Bridges, at Ogdensburgh, N. Y., while engaged as principal of the High School of that town. After a course of lectures at the University of Vermont he THE i\mDICAL PROFESSION. 581 entered the Albany Medical College, from which he graduated. At the opening of the Civil War he was commissioned assistant surgeon of the Forty-second Regiment, New York Volunteers, and was promoted to surgeon of the Ninety-sixth liegiment. After the muster out he practiced at Port Henry, N. Y., then at Gloversville, and in 18G8 settled at Bedford, West- chester County, where he died March 31, 1885. He was for two terms elected justice of the peace, and in 1881 was elected school commissioner and re- elected in 1884. He was a member, from its organi- zation, of Stewart Hart Post, G. A. R., Mount Kisco, and its commander for one year ; and an earn- est and active member of Kisco Lodge, F. and A. M. Among other offices he had held were those of vice- president of the New York State Medical Society, president of the Westchester County Medical Society and for several years he was a trustee of the Bedford Academy. BIOGRAPHY. GEORGE JACKSON FISHER. George Jackson Fisher, M.D., who has contributed more to the medical literature of Westchester County than any man either living or dead, was born in Westchester County, N. Y., November 27, 1825, and is a descendant of the early Dutch settlers, whose original name was Vischer. His father, who had been a merchant in the city of New York, removed to the central part of the State, and engaged in agricultural pursuits, when his son George was but eleven years of age. To his somewhat solitary life in the country the doctor attributes his fondness for Nature. To him she has always had " a voice of gladness, and a smile and eloquence of beauty," and much of his life has been spent in holding communion with her visi- ble forms. This is the secret of his preference for rural and village life, instead of the allurements of a city practice. The principal portion of his office pu- pilage was under the direction of Dr. Nelson Nivison, then of Mecklenburgh, Tompkins County, N. Y., now professor of physiology and pathology in the Medical Department of the Syracuse University. Dr. Fisher attended his first courses of medical lectures at the Medical Department of the University of Buf- falo, at which time Austin Flint, Sr., Frank Hastings Hamilton, James P. White and other celebrated pro- fessors gave character to this excellent school of med- icine. He next attended the lectures and demonstra- tions at the Medical Department of the University ol the City of New Yoi'k, where Mott, Pattison and Draper were the great luminaries of science and practice. Here he graduated in the class of 1849. Immediately thereafter he entered into a copartner- ship with his preceptor. In 1851 he removed to Sing Sing, where he has continued his practice to the present time. In his time he has performed most of the important operations of surgery, including ampu- tations, trephining, ovariotomy, the Ctesarean sec- tion, the removal of uterine fibroids, and, on two occasions, the ligation of the common carotid artery, with successful results. He has been the recipient of many honors, among which was the honorary degree of Master of Arts, in 1859, from Madison Univer- sity ; twice the presidency of the Medical Society of Westchester County; in 1864, vice- president of theMedical Society of the State of New York, and in 1874 president of the same ; cor- responding member of the Boston Gynaecological Society ; Fellow of the New York Academy of Medi- cine ; member of the New York Lyceum of Natural History ; corres- ponding member of the New York Historical Society ; permanent member of the Medical Society of the State of New York, and of the American Medical Association ; delegate from the Medical Society of the State of New York to the International Medical Con- gress in Philadelphia, in 1876, etc. He has also held the office of president of the village of Sing Sing, and was for several years physician and surgeon of the State Prisons at Sing Sing, for both males and females. For twenty years he was brigade-surgeon, N. Y. S. M., and, for a like period, United States examining surgeon in the Pension Bureau. On several occasions he served as a volunteer sur- geon for the United States Sanitary Commission, after the great battles of the Rebellion, and also as medical director of a floating hospital. His professional essays which have been thus far printed amount to not less than one thousand octavo pages. They embrace a variety of interesting topics; among them are the following titles : '' Biographical Sketches of Deceased Physicians of Westchester County, N. Y." (1861) ; " On the Animal Substances employed as Medicines by the Ancients" (1862); " Diploteratology," or an essay on " Double-Mon- sters " (Trans, of the Med. Soc. of the State of y. Y., 1865-68) ; "A Brief History of the Discovery of the Cir- culation of the Blood " (Pop. Sci. Monthly, July, 1877) ; " Teratology " [Johmon's Universal Cychpcedia, vol. i v.); "Influence of the Maternal Mind in the Production of Malformations " {Amer. Journ. of Insanity, vol. xxvi. January, 1870) ; " Sketches of the Lives, Times 582 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. and Works of some of the Old Masters of Anatomy, Surgery and Medicine " (consisting of twenty sketches, in Annals of Anatomy and 8ur(jery, vols, ii.-viii., 1880-83); "History of Surgery" (International Encyclopaedia of Surgery" vol. vi., N. Y., 1886). Several minor articles could be added to the above list. Dr. Fisher has shown a profound interest in the literature of his profession, both ancient and mod- ern. His library, which is quite well known to the medical scholars of the country, contains about four thousand volumes, including many of the rarest books now existing, in most of the depart- ments of the healing art. There is, perhaps, no collection of the medical classics equal to his to be found in private hands in the United States. It includes large series of works illustrating the devel- opment of anatomy, surgery, materia medica and medicine, from the earliest periods to the present time. His collections of works pertaining to the history of medicine, and the biography of physicians and surgeons, are quite extensive. The doctor has also been to great pains and cost in collecting the bibliography of teratology, a subject to which he has bestowed special attention. Mention should also be made of his collection of medals relat- ing to the medical profession ; and, also, of his collec- tion of more than one thousand engraved portraits of celebrated physicians, surgeons, anatomists and medi- cal authors. His library is enriched by a well- selected collection of medical essays, embracing about three thousand pamjihlcts, all carefully cata- logued and indexed. His private museum contains collections of typical objects in conchology, palseon- tology, mineralogy and archaeology. The latter de- partment is quite rich in specimens of the stone implements of the American aborigines. It is to Dr. Fisher that we are indebted for the his- tory of the town of Ossining, which forms one of the chapters of this work. THE JAY FAMILY. The Jay family,* so well-known throughout West- chester County, and indeed throughout the whole 'country, trace their ancestry to Pierre Jay, who left France on the revocation of the Edict of Nantes. He was an active and opulant merchant, extensively and profitably engaged in commerce. He married Judith, a daughter of Mr. Francois, a merchant in Rochelle. One of her sisters married M. Mouchard, whose son was a director of the French East India Company. Pierre Jay had three sons and one daugh- ter. The sons were Francis, who was the eldest; Augustus, born March 23, 1665 and Isaac. The daughtei-'s name was Frances. Mr. Jay seems to have been solicitous to have one of his sons educa- ted in England. He first sent his eldest, but he un- foi-tunately died of sea-sickness on the passage. iThe Jay family and Johu f'larkson Jay, M.D., (compiled from a sketch of the Jay family in " Baird's History of Rye.") Notwithstanding this distressing e^ent, he immedi- ately sent over Augustus, who was then only twelve years old. In 1683, he recalled Augustus and sent him to Africa, but to what part or for what purpose is now unknown. During the absence of Augustus, the persecution of the Protestants in France became severe; and Pierre Jay became one of its objects. Dragoons were quar- tered in his house, and his family were subjected to serious annoyance. He was imprisoned in the castle of Rochelle, but was released through the influence of some Roman Catholic connections. Having at the time several vessels out at sea which were ex- pected soon in port, he desired a Protestant pilot in his employ to take the first of these vessels that should arrive to a place agreed upon the Island of Rhe. The ship that arrived first was one from Spain, of which he was the sole owner. The pilot was faithful to his trust, and in due time Mr. Jay reached England and rejoined his family, whom he had sent to England some time before, at Plymouth. Augustus Jay returned to France from Africa, ignorant of these family changes. As it was unsafe to appear in Rochelle openly, he was secreted for some time by his aunt, Madame Mouchard, a Protestant, but whose husband was a Roman Catholic. With the help of his friends he escaped to the West Indies, and thence to Charleston, S. C. The climate proving unfavorable, he removed to Philadelphia and after- wards to Esopus on the Hudson River, where he entered into business ; but ultimately settled in New York. He re-visited France and England in 1692, and saw his father and sister ; his mother had lately died. In 1697 he married, in New York Anna Maria, daughter of Balthazar Bayard, the descendant of a Protestant professor of theology at Paris in the reign of Louis XIII., who had been compelled to leave Paris and take refuge with his wife and children in Holland ; whence several members of the family came to America. Mrs. Jay was a woman of eminent piety. It is mentioned that she died while on her knees in prayer. Augustus Jay lived to the good old age of eighty- six, respected and esteemed by his fellow citizens, and died in New York where he had j^ursued his calling as a merchant with credit and success, March 10, 1751. Peter Jay, only son of Augustus, married Mary, daughter of Jacobus VanCortlandt, January 20, 1728. Like his father, he was a merchant in the city of New York. Having earned a fortune which added to the property he had acquired by inheritance and mar- riage, he thought sufiicient, he resolved when little more than forty years old, to retire into the country, and for this purpose purchased a farm at Rye, where he died April 17, 1782. James Jay, third son of Peter, born October 16, 1732, became Sir James .Jay, Kt.; he resided for some years in England, and returned after the Revolution THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 583 to New York, where he lived uutil his death, Octo- ber 20, 1815. On his return from Enghmd in 1784 or 1785, he brought propositions from the Countess of Huntington to some of the States of the Union, for establishing settlements of emigrants among the Indians, with a view to civilizing them, and convert- ing them to Christianity. General Washington in a letter to him dated January 2'^, 1785, expresses his entire approval of the plan, and suggests that it should be brought before Congress.' Peter, fourth son of Peter Jay, and brother of the former, was born December IJt, 1734, and married in 17St', Mary Duyckinck. Though he had the misfor- tune of losing his eyesight in early life through an attack of small-pox, many interesting stories are re- lated of his ingenuity and sagacity and he is said to have possessed a fine mind and an excellent character. John Jay, sixth son of Peter, was born December 12, 1745. His boyhood was spent at Rye and New Rochelle. He was admitted to the bar in 17G8. On I Ajtril 28. 1774, he married Sarah, daughter of William Livingston, afterwards governor of New Jersey. He soon took a foremost position in the politics of the country, and was prominent in the debates of the first and the second Continental Congress. In 1777 he was appointed chief justice of the State of New York. In 1778 he was elected president of Congress. In 1779 he was sent as Minister to Spain, and from thence, in 1780, went to Pans as Commissioner to assist in the negotiation of a treaty of peace with Great Britain. He returned to New York in 1784, after an absence of five years, and was received with tokens of esteem and admiration. December 21, 1784, he was appointed by Congress, secretary for foreign affairs, and held the office for five years. He was one of the con- tributors to The Federalist. In 1789 he was appointed chief justice of the United States, — an office which he was the first to fill. In 1794 he was sent as special Minister to London, upon a delicate and most im- portant mission, relating to difficulties growing out of unsettled boundaries and certain commercial com- plications. He discharged this duty with great ability, and upon his return to America, in 1795, was elected by a large majority Governor of the State of New York. At the end of three years he was re- elected, and at the expiration of a second term was solicited to become a candidate for election a third time. But he had determined to renounce public life, and though nominated again in 1800, to the ofiice of chief justice of the United States, declined the honor, and retired to his paternal estate, at Bed- ford ; a property — part of the Van Cortlandt estate — which his father had acquired by marriage with Mary, a daughter of Jacobus Van Cortlandt. There he lived tor twenty-eight years a peaceful and hon- ored life. In 1827 he was seized with severe illness, and after two years of weakness and suflering, was ' ■" Writings of Washington," by .Tared Sparks. Vol. IX., [ip. SC-i*!i. Struck with palsy, May 14, 1829, and died three days after. He was buried in the family cemetery at Rye. His public reputation as a patriot and statesman of the Revolution was second only to that of Washing- ton, and his private character as a man and a Chris- tian is singularly free from stain or blemish.^ Peter Augustus, eldest son of John Jay, was born January 24, 177t). He graduated from Columbia College in 1794 and studied law under Peter J. Monroe. He married Mary Rutherford, daughter of General Matthew Clarkson, and became prominent in the legal profession and public affairs. He was a member of the State Assembly in 1816 ; recorder of New York in 1818; a member of the convention which framed the constitution of the State in 1821, and for many years president of the New York Histori- cal Society, trustee of Columbia College, etc. He re- ceived the degree ofLL.D. in 1831, from Harvard, and in 1835 from Columbia. He died February 20, 1843. John Clarkson Jay, M.D., eldest sou of Peter Augustus, was born September 11, 1808, and mar- ried Laura, daughter of Nathaniel Prime. Heis the pro- prietor of the estate atRye,andthe present well-known representative of the family in Westchester County. After a thorough preparation in private schools, among which were those of the blind teacher, Mr. Nelson, and the IMcCulloch school at Morristown, N. Y., he en- tered Columbia College, from which he graduated, to- gether, with the late Secretary of State, Hamilton Fish, and many other distinguished men in the class of 1827.'' In 1831 he took his degree as M.D. He has been a deep student of natural history, especially of conchology, and the valuable collection of shells, formerly in his possession, and which is now in the New York Museum of Natural History, having been purchased by Miss Wolf and presented to that in- stitution by her, in memory of her father, has the rep- utation of being the finest in the country. On this blanch Dr. Jay has written several pamphlets, among which are the following : " Catalogue of Recent Shells, etc.," New York, 1835, 8vo, pp. 56 ; "De- scription of New and Rare Shells, with four plates," New York, 1836, 2d ed., pp. 78 ; " A Catalogue, &c., together witli a description of new and Rare Species," New York, pp. 125, 4to., ten plates. The article on shells in the narrative of Commodore Perry's expedi- tion to Japan, is also by him. He has been con- nected with many prominent literary and social or- ganizations, both in Westchester County and in the city of New York, where he spends much of his time. He has been for many years a trustee of Columbia College, and has, at two different periods, served as trustee of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of the City of New York. He was one of the founders and at one time recording secretary of the New York Yacht Club, the annals of which will show the lively interest which he took in its management and general Tlie Life of .loliii Jay," in 2 vols. By Ills son, William ,Tay. 3See "Continued Catalogue of Columbia College." 584 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. affairs. The records of the New York Lyceum of Natural History, now known as the New York Academy of Natural Sciences, will exhibit the interest mani tested by him iu that most useful organization. Dr. Jay is an Episcopalian and has been connected for many years with Christ Church, Rye, of which he is warden. He is well known throughout Westches- ter County, where he has long been greatly appre- ciated for his social and literary qualities. These and many other illustrious names have adorned the history of the Jay family in America, the members of which have ever been faithful to their country, faithful to their religion and faithful to them- selves. Their residence there has added lustre to West- chester County, and their noble influence will be re- membered while American history continues to be read- WILLIAM ANDERSON VARIAN. William Anderson Varian, M.D., is descended from an old French family, who came to this country at an early date, the regular line of descent being as fol- lows : First, Isaac, who was living in New York in 1720 and died about 1800 ; second, James, born Janu- ary 10. 1734, died Decemb(fl- 11, 1800; third, James, born November 22, 1765, died December 26, 1841 ; fourth, Dr. William A. Varian, who was born at Scars- dale January 23, 1820. His mother was Elizabeth, daughter of John Cornell, a member of the Society of Friends and of a family noted for patriotism and vir- tue. He attended school in his native place up to the age of sixteen, and then went to White Plains, where he was a student at the academy for three years. He then entered the office of Livingston Roe, M.D., and continued with him for the same period. The death of his father, which occurred about that time, ren- dered it necessary for him to labor for his own sup- port, and for a while he was employed as a teacher in East Chester. He afterwards entered the office of Dr. James R. Wood, a prominent physician of New York, and remained under his instruction for three years, at the same time attending the lectures at the medical department of the University of the City of New York, where he graduated, with the degree of M.D., March 4, 1846. After practicing for one year in New York he removed to King's Bridge, which has ever since been his home, and has been constantly employed in the practice of his profession. In 1849 he purchased a portion of the old Macomb estate and erected his present residence. He married Frances Elizabeth, daughter of Francis Losee, September 11, 1845. Their children were Sarah (deceased), Pamelia (wifeof Maynard L. Granger), James (of Neola, Iowa), George Dibble (deceased), Sarah and Alice (both de- ceased). Dr. Varian is one of the oldest residents of King's Bridge and thoroughly acquainted with the history of the locality and its early families. When he com- menced practice, the country round was thinly set- tled, and his rides to visit his patients extended from One Hundred and Tenth Street on one hand to Green- burgh on the other. He was also frequently called to the villages on the western bank of the Hudson, and on one occasion, while crossing during a cold winter night, his boat became fast in the floes of floating ice and drifted below Fort Washington ; he and his two companions narrowly escaping a watery grave. He was present when ground was broken for the Hudsjn River Railroad and was surgeon for the company of contractors, they paying him at the rate of twenty- five cents a month for each man on the work. In 1850 he made the acquaintance of Dr. Edwin N. Bibby, a prominent physician of New York, and this acquaintance ripened into a deep friendship, which lasted till the death of Dr. Bibby, in 1882. He was for many years his family physician. Dr. Bibby hav- ing retired from practice and spent the last years of his life on the Van Cortlandt Manor. During the late war Dr. Varian was a strong friend of the Union and plainly outspoken in his sentiments. During the riots in 1863 his life was repeatedly threatened, and for a while he made his professional visits armed with a double-barreled gun and a revolver, which he would have unhesitatingly used had occasion required. In politics and religion he maintains independent and liberal views, and the evening of his life is passed in the enjoyment of friends and home. He had for many years been one of the police surgeons of New York and commands the respect of his professional brethren. HOSEA FOUNTAIN, M.D. Hosea Fountain, M.D., the second son of James Fountain. M.D., was born at Jefferson Valley, a ham- let in the northern portion of Yorktown, July 24, 1817. His ancestry, both paternal and maternal, were English. The Fountain family, probably, were of Norman origin, and are supposed to be descended from Sir John Fountain, a monument to whom is found in a village church-yard in Devonshire, Eng- land. Moses Fountain emigrated from Bedfordshire, England, in 1650. The genealogy is as follows, — Moses Fountain. Moses Fountain (whom w e find in the town of Bedford in 1741.) I Matthew Fountain (who being a loyalist during the Revolution, moved I within the English lines to East Oiester.) Rev. Ezra Fountain (pastor of the Baptist Church in Bedford for thirty- j five years.) I i i James, M.D. Hosea. Tyler. Jabes Husted. Hosea) Cyrus Horton. Ezra James, M.D. Elias. ) Dr. Fountain's maternal grandfather lived at Cos- cob, Conn., prior to the Revolution, but being a loyalist his property was confiscated and he was obliged to accept a settlement at the hands of the British government at St. John, New Brunswick. Charlotte Husted wa.s born there, but at the age of twelve or thirteen years, came to New York to reside I THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 585 with her aunt, who was a Van Guilder. Here, doubt- less, Dr. James Fountain made her acquaintance. Hosea Fountain received his English education in the district school of'his native village, and at a school kept by a Rev. Mr. Patterson, in Patterson, Putnam County, X. Y. His professional studies were pursued at several schools. He attended the medical depart- ment of Fairfield College, Fairfield, N. Y., 1835-36 ; Jefl'erson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pa., 1836- 37 ; College of Physicians and Surgeons New York, 1837-38, and would have graduated at the latter in March, 1838, if he had reached his majority. For this reason we find him in 1838-39 at the Medical Institution of Yale College, New Haven, Ct. He re- ceived his degree of M.D. March 26, 1839, from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of New York, and spent six months in the New York Hosjiital. He practiced medicine with his father at Jeffer- son Valley for a time, and after his marriage with Mary Horton, daughter of Joel and Harriet Mont- rous Horton, in February 19, 1840, he settled at Peekskill. In 1843 he removed to Somers, and later in 1854 or 1855 he purchased the property on which he resided, until his death, August 28, 1885. Yorktown and the adjoin- ing town of Somers were the field of his profession- al labors, until April, 1884, more than forty years. He was laid to rest Septem- ber 1, 1885. The funeral took place in the Presby- terian Church, which was filled with those who themselve-i or in their families, had had the benefit at one time or another of his professional services. June 20, 1872, he married, as his second wife, Mary Brett, daughter of James and Helen Ann Brett, of Fishkill and grand-daughter of Ebenezer White, M.D., of Somers. She survives him. The issue of the first marriage are Harriet Louise, Eliiis, Charlotte (now Mrs. Erskine Wcstervelt, of Hackensack, N. J.), and Mary Emma (now Mrs. Theodore F. Tompkins, of Yorktown.) Of the second, Grace, Elias Fountain (who was second lieutenant of the Si.xth New York Heavy Artillery, and died from the effects of a wound received at Cedar Creek, Va., October 19, 1864), and his sister, Harriet Louise, who died ten days later from a gangrenous sore-throat, con- tracted from him while caring for him in his last illness. 55 < THE HASBROUCK FAMILY. The Hasbrouck family is of French Huguenot origin, and descended from Abraham Hasbroucq, who was a native of Calais. His father moved to the Palatinate, in Germany, with his two sons, Jean and Abraham, and a daughter. Here they lived for several years, and in 1675 Abraham Hasbroucq came to America " with several of his acquaintances, the descendants or followers of Peter Waldus." He landed at Boston, and in July, 1675, found his way to Esopus, Ulster County, N. Y., where he found his brother Jean, "who had come two years before." The next year he married Marie, daughter of Christian Duyou (Deyo), with whom he was acquainted in the Palatinate. She died March 27, 1741, at the age of eighty-eight. In 1677 he, with twelve others, ob- tained a patent from Gov- ernor Andross, for a large tract o'f land at New Paltz, in Ulster County, where he and his brother settled and " lived and died there." Abraham Hasbroucq was one of the founders of the Walloon Protestant Church, at New Paltz. He was a very prominent citizen, and for many years a member of the Provin- cial Assembly. On Sun- day, March 17, 1717, he was struck with apoplexy, " whereof he died very suddenly at a very good old age, and rests in the Lord till his coming to judge both the quick and the dead." He left five children, — Joseph, Solo- mon (who died April 3, 1753), Daniel (died January 25th, 1759, aged sixty-seven), Benjamin and Rachel, (wife of Louis Dubois). Joseph, the eldest son, married, in 1706, Elsie, daugh- ter of Captain Joachim Schoonmaker, whose father, Hendrick Joakimse Schoonmaker, " was a native of Hanse Town, in Germany." Joseph Hasbrouck died January 28, 1723-24, age forty years and three months. His wife, Elsie, died July 27, 1764, aged seventy-eight years, eight months, three days, "and was buried at New Paltz by the side of her husband. She brought up all her children in honor and credit." They left " six sons and four daughters," — Abraham ; Isaac D. ; Rachel, born 1715, died 1756, wife of Jan Eltinge; Mary, wife of Abraham Hardenberg, born 586 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. January 10, 1714, died 1774; Sarah, wife of William Osterhoudt, born February 21, 1709, died 1780; Ben- jamin ; Jacob, who married Mary Hoornbeck ; and Colonel Jonathan.' The names of one son and one daughter do not appear. Abraham, the eldest son, was born on the old family homestead at Guilford, Ulster County, August 21, 1707. He married his first cousin, Catharine Bruyn, January 5, 1788-89. She was born June 24, 1720, and died August 10, 1793. She was a daughter of Jacobus Bruyn, and his wife, Tryntie, who was a daughter of Captain Joakim Schoonmaker, and died August 27, 1763, aged seventy- eight. The father of Jacobus Bruyn " was a native of Norway, and came here in the Dutch time, and married Gertruy Esselstein." Jacobus Bruyn lived at Bruynswyck, in Ulster County, and died November 21, 1744, aged sixty-four. He had a sister E-sther, who married Zachariah Hoffma'n. Abraham Has- brouck was one of the most prominent men of Ulster County, and was for thirty years a member of the Legislature. He settled in Kingston in 1735, and died there November 10, 1791, and "was buried the next day with the honors of war." He left eight children, — Elsie, wife of Abraham Salisbury; Catha- rine, wife of Abram Houghtaling ; Mary, wife of David Bevier ; Jonathan, who married Catharine, daughter of Cornelius and Catharine Wynkoop ; Jo- seph, who married Elizabeth Bevier; Jacobus, who married Maria, daughter of Charles De Witt ; and Daniel, who married Rachel, daughter of Colonel Jonathan Hasbrouck (his uncle), of Newburgh. Isaac Hasbrouck, the second son of Josejjh, was born March 12, 1712 (O.S.). In 1766 he married Antie Low, widow of John Van Gaasbeck. They had three children — Joseph, Elsie and Jane, wife of John Crispell. Isaac died April 6, 1778, "and was buried at the Shawangunk church-yard, near the burying- place of Jacobus Bruyn's family." His widow, Antie, died October 2, 1784. Joseph Hasbrouck, the son of Isaac and Antie, married Cornelia, daughter of Edmond Schoonmaker, and they were the parents of nine children — Stephen; Sarah, wife of David Tuttle ; Maria, wife of Thomas Ostrander ; Jane, wife of Cornelius De Witt ; Katy, wife of Samuel Johnson ; Levi, George, Abel and Augustus. Augustus Hasbrouck married Jane Eltinge, and left children — Dr. Stephen, of Yonkers; Dr. Joseph, of Dobbs Ferry; Wilhelnms, Cornelius, Richard, Augustus, Cornelia, wife of William Simpson, Abra- ham, James H., Aaron, David, Herman and Edward. 1 Col. Jonathan Hasbrouck was the youngest child, and was born April 12, 1722. He married Tryntie, daughter of Corneli\is Dubois, and set- tled in Newburgh. He died .luly 31, 1780, and " was buried on his own land by two of his sons, between his house and the North River." His homestead is the famous " Washington's Headquarters," at Newburgh, now uwned by the State of New York. He left children — Cornelius, Isaac, Jonathan, Rachel and JIary. He was a very tall man, being six feet four inches in height. Stephen Hasbrouck, M.D., son of Augustus Has- brouck and Jane Elting, was born in Bergen County, N. J., January 29, 1842. His maternal grandfather was pastor of the Dutch Reformed Church at Paramus for thirty years. At the age of fourteen young Has- brouck went to Great Fulls, Mass., where he engaged as a clerk. He stayed three years, then returned home, and attended the Normal School at Trenton, and afterwards entered business as a commission mer- chant in New York. In 1862 he entered the College of Physicians and Surgeons, and afterwards studied in the New York Homceopathic Medical College. At the close of the late war a colony from New Or- leans, composed of persons who had been disloyal to the Union, resolved to seek a new home in Brazil. They numbered about three hundred souls, and en- gaged the services of Dr. Hasbrouck as surgeon to the expedition. The experience of a few years convinced most of them that they had not bettered their condi- tion by leaving their native country, and, through the influence of Dr. Hasbrouck, the captains of some ol the United States war vessels were induced to bring back the relics of the colony, who returned much better reconciled to the government and the starry flag than when they went away. While in Brazil he wrote a history of the practice of homcejpathy in that country, which was published by the New England Medical Gazette. He was on the island of St. Thomas during the hurricane and earthquake which devas- tated it, and published the first description of the fearful scene of destruction. On his return he gradu- ated from the New York Homoeopathic Medical Col- lege, and settled at Dobbs Ferry, where he remained three years in the practice of his profession. In 1874 he removed to New Y'ork, where he stayed till 1881, when he made a very extensive tour in Europe and the East, visiting Egypt and Palestine and most ot the countries of the Old World. Returning from his travels in 1883, he settled in Yonkers, which has since been his home. He married Anna M., daughter of Captain John Stillwell, of New York, and has two children — Au- gustus and Mabel. He holds a good position among the members of the homoeopathic medical pro- fession, and is esteemed as a useful and worthy citizen. Dr. Hasbrouck's maternal grandfather, Wilhelmus Elting, was of Huguenot origin, and his ancestry could be traced back to Henry IV. of France. Dr. Hasbrouck was a surgeon in the Brazilian army dur- ing the war with Paraguay, and, while in South America, passed through several epidemics of small- pox and cholera. He was in St. Thomas during a violent epidemic of yellow fever, and the good results that followed his methods of treatment proved their efijcacy. Joseph Hasbrouck, M.D., was born in Bergen County, New Jersey, March 20, 1839, and remained in his native village till the age of fifteen, when he \ THE MEDICAL I*R0FES8I0X. commenced teaching school, in which he was engaged for two years. At the establishment of the New Jersey Normal School he entered that institution, and graduated in due time. He then engaged in teaching until he reached the age of twenty-nine. During the latter part of this period he pursued the study of medicine, and in 18(59 graduated from the Medical Department of the University of the City of New York. He im- mediately investigated the system of homoeopathy, and has since practiced it. His first year of practice was at Goshen, Orange County, N. Y. From thence he removed to Newton, Sussex County, N. J., and was the first to practice homu'opathy in that county. In 1875 he removed to Dobbs Ferry, which has since been his place of residence. He is a member of the Westchester County Homeopathic Medical Society, and was its president for two yeai-s. He has been four times married. His wives were Sarah and Anna D., both daughters of Elias Dayton, of New Jersey, and cousins of Hon. Wm. L. Dayton ; Emma, daugh- ter of Steven Archer; and Ellen M., daughter of Rev. D. L. Marks, of the New York Conference. Of the children of Dr. Hasbrouck, his eldest son, Dayton, Avho died January 13, 1885, at the age of twenty four, was at the time of his death a member of the senior class of the New York Homoeopathic College. His surviving children are Edith S. and Mabel E., twin daughters, and an infant son, David Marks. Although not a professional politician, he has al- ways taken a deep interest in political affairs, and is ■especially interested in all that pertains to the wel- fare of the locality in which he lives. He has been for several years a member of the Board of Education of Dobbs Ferry, and is its present president. He is also health officer of the village, and president of the savings bank. He has been connected with the Re- publican party since its organization, and has always taken a deep interest in its success. His residence is one of the historical land marks of Westchester County. It is the old Livingston mansion, formerly the residence of Van Brugh Liv- ingston. It was at this house that General Washing- ton, Governor Clinton and General Sir Guy Tarleton met on the suspension of hostilities. May 3, 1783, to arrange for the evacuation of New York. The man- sion, which is a well-preserved relic of olden times, stands on the east side of the old Albany post road, a short distance below Livingston Avenue. The place was sold by Van Brugh Livingston to Steven Archer in 1836, and was his residence till the time of his death, which occurred in 1877, and was purchased from his heirs by Dr. Hasbrouck in 1882. Dr. Levi Wells Flagg was born in West Hartford, ■Conn.. February 14, 1817. After receiving a thorough primary education, he became a student of Yale Col- lege, where he graduated in 1839. Among his class- mates were Charles Astor Bristed and John Sher- wood, of New York, Rev. Francis Wharton, joint 587 author of " Wharton and Stille's Medical Jurispru- dence," and Hon. H. L. Dawes, of Massachusetts, ex- Governor Hall of Missouri, Prof. J. D. Whitney, of California, the eminent chemist and geologist, and others who have become distinguished. After graduating he went south and spent three years in teaching in St. Francisville, Louisiana. Re- turning to his native place in 1842, he studied medi- cine for a year with Dr. Pinckney W. Ellsworth. At ihe expiration of that time removing to New York City, he entered the office of Prof Willard Parker, with whom he remained two years. In 1847 he graduated at the College of Physicians and Surgeons (old Crosby Street school), and in the following year establishedhimself in Yonkers as an allopathic physi- cian. Shortly afterward he was induced to investi- gate honKL'opathy, the result being a conviction as he said of its superiority over the old system of practice. He at once became its strong advocate and the pioneer practitioner in the county. His suc- cess in introducing the new system was most marked ; he grew rapidly in favor with the community, ac- quiring wealth and a pre-eminent position among the physicians of the locality. Notwithstanding his change of faith, the relations between himself and his old teacher. Professor Par- ker, greatly to the honor of the latter ever continued of the most friendly character. Dr. Flagg avoided politics entirely, and never held any public office of a political character. He always devoted himself wholly to his profession, in which he was a zealous and untiring worker ; a portion of a year spent in Europe and a short time in Mexico, being almost the only relaxation he al- lowed himself between the commencement of his practice and his death on May 15, 1884. When, in 1865, the Westchester County Homoeo- pathic Medical Society was organized, he was elected its president and held that office for three years. He was also a member of the American Institute of Homoeopathy. He married on May 17, 1848, Charlotte Whitman, of Hartford, Conn., and had eight children, five of whom are still living. Their names are Howard W., Marietta W., Lucy W., George A. and Robert N. Flagg, M. D., who succeeds to the practice of his father.' It is with pleasure that we present our readers with the above brief outline sketch of one of the most popular and successful physicians as well as most useful and upright citizens that it has ever been the good fortune of Westchester County to possess. Dr. Flagg came to Yonkei-s when the village was in its infancy and for thirty-six years watched its develop- ment and growth. No one was or could be better known than he. By his steadfast integrity, his pro- 1 The above with slight modification is from the " Biographical cyclo- pedia of honin'opathic physicians and surgeons." (S. A. George it Co. 1873.) 588 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. fessional ability and his genial and winning manner he won for himself the respect of the business com- munity, an extensive and lucrative practice and a high social standing. His death not only creates a vacancy beside the family hearth, but is also a loss to the city and county in which he lived, which is irre- parable. ADRIAN Iv. HOFFMAN. Dr. Adrian K. Hoffman, who is remembered as one of the most distinguished physicians of Westchester County, was born at the Manor of Livingston, in Columbia County, March 26, 1797. Entering the pro- fession of medicine at an early age, his first experi- ence was on a three years' cruise as surgeon's mate on board the United States man-of-war " Franklin," commanded by Commodore (afterwards Admiral) Charles Stewart. After his return Dr. Hoffman set- tled at Sing Sing, and for nearly half a century prac- ticed his profession with great success. His reputa- tion was widely extended, and he was justly esteemed by his fellow-citizens as a wise and skillful physician and a prudent and able man of business. He was chosen several times as president of the village of Sing Sing by unanimous elections. He married Jane, daughter of Dr. John Thompson, of Saratoga County, with whom he had studied medi- cine. The issue of this marriage were Cornelia, who married Alfred Buckhout, and died in January, 1866 ; John Thompson, who became in succession twice recorder, twice mayor of the city of Xew York and twice Governor of the State, and who married Ella, daughter of Henry Starkweather, of New York ; Mary E., wife of Colonel Charles O. Joline ; Emma Kis- sam, who married Rev. M. M. Wells, and occupies the homestead at Sing Sing; and Katharine, who first married Captain Charles C. Hyatt, United States Army, and, after his decease, married General Wil- liam H. Morris. After a long life of active usefulness Dr. Hoffman died May 6, 1871, universally beloved and mourned by all his neighbors. On the day of his funeral the houses and places of business were draped in mourn- ing and all business was suspended. He is spoken of with loving respect by those who knew him and yet survive, and by the children of others, with whom his name is a household word. HENRY ERNEST SCHMID, M.D. Henry Ernest Schmid, M.D., who is a well-known member of the medical profession, was born in Sax- ony, Prussia, May 1, 1824. His father, who was a publisher and connected with the famous family of Tauchnitz, intended him to follow his profession. After receiving his early education at the great Latin school at Halle, Dr. Schmid commenced a higher literary course for that purpose. His father,, unfor- tunately, incurred the censure of the government, and this changed the whole tenor of the son's life. The latter emigrated to this country in 1853, and soon after his arrival went to Virginia, and having an early predilection for the study of medicine, pursued that branch of science at Winchester and at the Uni- versity of Virginia. For a while he was connected with a newspaper in Richmond, and in 1859 was sent, under the auspices of the Episcopal Board of Foreign Missions, as medical missionary to Japan. While in that country he organized a hospital and his practice increased to an enormous extent among the natives, who were quick to learn the superiority of foreign practitioners. Owing to the failure of his health he obtained a position on board the flag-ship of an Eng- lish surveying fleet as interpreter. In this capacity he visited Corea and northern China, Borneo, Java and Sumatra. The ship, having narrowly escaped destruction in a typhoon, went to Cape Town for re- pairs, and Dr. Schmid embraced the opportunity to make an extensive tour in southern Africa. He after- wards went to St. Helena and the Azores, and thence to England, returning to this country in 1862. He came to White Plains, Westchester County, in 1859, when he made a short visit. Upon his return from England he settled in this place, and has been engaged in the practice of his profession to the pres- ent time. With a devoted love of science, Dr. Schmid, while in Japan, made many valuable collec- tions for the Smithsonian Institution, which led to his being made a member of the Oriental Society, and of the American Association for the Advance- ment of Science. In his profession he has enjoyed a very extensive practice, and is justly considered one of the leading physicians of the county. He is a member of the American Medical Association, the State Medical Society and the Westchester County Medical Society. As a prominent citizen of the village he is president of the Board of Health, and of the Board of Educa- tion, and is a member of the vestry of Grace Episco- pal Church. He is also the physician in charge of St. Vincent Retreat for the Insane. He married Eu- genia, daughter of Eugene T. Prudhomme, of White Plains, and they have three children — Theodora,. Gertrude and Permetta. CHARLES J. NORDQUIST. The father of Charles J. Nordquist, M.D., the well- known physician, was Lars Peter Nordquist, who was born at Sounerly, in Sweden, March 29, 1781. He was a surgeon in the Swedish army, which he entered April 22, 1802, remaining in the employ of the government till his decease, in 1824. He was an eminent physician and was the recipient of many high appointments both in military and civil life. On the 16th and 17th of March, 1809, he accompanied the Royal Mounted Life Guards in their retreat upon ' the ice over the Gulf of Bothnia, and afterward be- came surgeon to Bernadoth, King of Sweden. On January 3, 1812, he married Sophia Christina Weu- I •I THE .^lEDICAL PKOFESSION. 589 gren (daughter of Ivan Weugren and Sophia Chris- tina Habicht) who was born December 18, 1782, and died June 10, 1830. Charles J., their son, was born at Jousered, near Oottenberg, Sweden, on the llith of July, 1821. He was left iit three years of age in the care of his father's cousin, Lars Peter Afzelius, dean of Alingsas, who sent him at the age of nine to the high school in that place. Here he remained for eight years, when he removed to Stockholm for the purpose of acquaint- ing himself with the drug trade. After three years of practical experience as a pharmacist, he entered the Carlingasta Institute, where he studied medicine, graduating in 1842. A year spent in traveling through Europe followed his graduation, after which he sailed for the United States, arriving at New York in 1843. He engaged first as a drug clerk, but in 1848, having meanwhile mastered the English language, he es- tablished a store of his own on the corner of Broome and Mulberry Streets, New York. Disposing of this at a profit to himself, he en- gaged until 1854 in the fitting out and selling of drug-stores. He then en- tered the University Jled- ical College of the city of New Y'ork, from which he graduated in 185(3. After practicing two years in New Y'ork City, he removed to Tucka- hoe, N.Y. In 1861 he joined the Ninth Regiment as surgeon, and like his father's, his army life was an eventful one. From the time he was commissioned, he rose rapidly in favor with his superiors and received one mark of respect after another with enviable rapid- ity. He was ap])oiiited chief surgeon of the Third Brigade, medical director of the Second Division, and finally medical inspector of the First Army Corps. On February 1, 1864, he received a note of thanks from the commanding general for the efficient manner in which he had performed his duties ; and two years after the dei)arture of the Ninth Eeginient from New Y'ork, he was presented by its non-commissioned ofticers and privates with a handsome gold watch and chain as a token of their resi)ect and esteem. Unlike some of the officers of the late war, Dr. Nordquist did not make use of his official power to shirk his duty in the hour of danger, but was pres- ent and actively engaged at every battle, in which his division participated. On the fields of Harper's Ferry, Cedar Mountain, Rappahannock Station, Thor- oughfare Gap, Second Bull Run, Chantilly, South Mountain, Antietam, First Fredericksburg, Chancel- lorsville, Gettysburg, The Wilderness, Laurel Hill, Spottsylvania and Coal Harbor he was present in per- son, administering the comforts of his profession to the sick and dying soldiery. As a surgeon, he was most successful, and several of his cases are mentioned in the surgical history of the war of the Rebellion. At the battle of Gettys- burg, on the 1st of July, 1863, he was taken prison- erby the Confederates and was held for three days and nights upon one pint of flour without the means of preparing it for food. Being placed by his cap- tors in one of the churches of the town, he escaped by crawling into the stee- ple and remaining con- cealed till the advance of the Union troops. On June 23, 1864, he closed his career in the army and sought again the quiet of his home in Tuckahoe. Here he has since re- mained, honored and re- spected among his asso- ciates in the profession and looked up to with pleasure by the many friends who surround the home of his adop- tion. He is a Republican in politics, and held the office of coroner for four years. He is a member of the Lutheran Church, and is well- known for his liberality. He married on April 28, 1846, Harriet Louise Goodwin, and has had three children, all daughters, of whom one died in early vouth and two still survive and are married. D. JEROME SANDS. To chronicle within the limits of this work, all that is either important or interesting in the record of a family prominent in English and American history for a period of more than eight hundred years would be impossible, and but a brief outline of it can be given here. The first trace of the familv is found in the reign of 590 HISTOKi' OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Edward the Confessor (son of Ethelred and Emma) before the conquest, 1042 to 1066, when Ulnod dwelt in the Isle of Wight, in the County of Hampshire, at a place called Sandes. From this the surname (at the time of the Holj' Wars) of Sandes, Sandis, Sandys, Sands is derived. Sir John Sandys of Hampshire was a knight-baronet, in the reign of Richard II., 1377-1399. John Sands, born in 1485 at Horborm, Straffordshire, died in 1625 at the age of one hundred and forty. His wife lived to be one hundred and twenty years old. Sir William Sandys was the first baron of the name. By his eminent services to the Kings Henry VII. and VIII., he advanced his family to wealth and honor. He was prominent in the sup- pression of the Cornish Rebellion, and was created Lord Sandys in 1524 by Henry VIII., who ap- pointed him Lord Cham- berlain in 1526. The same king made him a Knight of the Garter and employ- ed him in the wars with France, after which he was created Baron. Sir William, Lord Sandys, his grandson, was a member of Parliament, and one of the commis- sioners appointed by Queen Elizabeth for the trial of Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk, Jan- uary 16, 1571; also for that of Mary Queen of Scots, October 12, 1586, and Philip Howard, Earl ofArundel,April 18,1589. He was imprisoned lor a short time in 1600 for joining with Robert, Earl of Sussex, in an insurrection in London. His princely man- sion at Basing- stoke, called the Vine, was famous as the reception place of the State embassy sent by King Henry IV. of France to Queen Elizabeth in 1601. Edwin Sandys, D. D.,was an eminent Prelate of Eng- land. Hewasbornin 1519, became Master of St. Cath- erine College in 1547, Prebendarj- of Peterboro in 1549 and of Carlisle in 1552. He was Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge University in 1553, and a strong advocate of the reformation. He preached a sermon in favor of the royal claims of Lady Jane Grey, and refused to proclaim Mary Queen of Scots, for which he was deprived of his honors, sent to the Tower and after- ward to Marshalsea, where he was imprisoned for seven months. Pursued by the persecution of his enemies, he escaped from England in May 1554. In 1558, after the coronation of Elizabeth, he returned to England. Under her, he held many important positions. He was one of the nine Protestants sent to dispute with nine Catholics before Parliament, and in 1559 became Bishop of Worcester. He was appointed by Queen Elizabeth one of a commission under Bishop Parker to i:)repare a new translation of the Bible, known as the Bishops' Bible. In 1570 he became Bishop of London, and in 1576 Archbishop of York. He died at the Archiepiscopal palace of Southwell, Juh- 10, 1588, and his alabaster tomb and effigy are looked upon by visitors to this day with peculiar interest. ^ Sir Edwin Sandys, son of the preceding, born in Worcester, 1561, was an English statesman ot great ability. He travel- ed extensively on the continent, after which he published "Europte Spec- ulum, or- a Survey of the State of Religion in the Western part of the World." He was knight- ed by James I. in 1603, and became an influen- tial member of the Sec- ond London Company for Virginia, into which he introduced the vote by ballot. He was the trea- surer or chief officer of the company, and was indefatigable in promot- ing public prosperity and security. In 1620, Span- ish influence having been exerted against him, King James, in violation of the charter, forbade ^ y y^ his re-election. ^^y^^^-^ -George, a bro- ther of Sir Ed- win, was a fa- mous English poet. He was educated at Ox- ford, and published "A Relation of a Journey Begun A.D. 1610, in Four Books, Containing a Description of the Turkish Empire, of Egypt, of the Holy Land and of the Remote Parts of Italy and Adjoining Islands also a " Translation of Ovid's 'Metamorphoses.'" In 1621 he became colonial treasurer of Virginia, where he distinguished himself by his public zeal. He executed all orders concern- ing staple commodities ; to him is due the build- ing of the first water mill; he promoted the establish- ment of iron works in 1621, and in the following 'From Appleton's " Encyclopiedia." - Also from Appleton. 9 I THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 591 year introduced ship building. While in Virginia he triinslatcd tlie last ten books uf the " Metamor- phoses," and, alter returning to Enghind, in 1026, he published the translation of the whole. He also wrote poetical versions of the Psalms, of the Book of Job, Ecclesiastes, Lamentations, etc., and of the Song of Solomon. His life, by tiie Rev. J. H. Todd, is pre- fixed to " Selections from Sandy "s Jletrical Para- phrases." (Loudon, 1839.) Samuel Sandys, who, in 1741, accused Sir Robert Walpole of fraud and cor- ruption, was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer, in 1742; created Lord Sandys by George II., 1743; was First Commissioner of the Board of Trade, 1761 ; and died 1770. These and many other gentlemen whose names are conspicuous in English history, were members of the family in the direct line. Though many of their descendants have also been prominent in this country, the family is still influential in Eng- land. Its i)resent representative there is Baron Augustus Frederick Arthur Sandys, born March 1, 1840; married, August 3, 1872, Augustus Ann, second daughter of the late Charles Hes Vocux, Bart. His seat is at Ombersley Court, Droitwich. The first known member of the American family was Henry Sandy, who came to Boston, Mass., and established himself as a merchant. He was prominent as a relig- ious worker, and upon one occasion, when he, with others, was in the act of starting a new church at Rowley, a clerk called him Sands, which was the ori- gin of the present spelling. D. Jerome Sands, M.D., president of the village of Port Chester, and one of the first physicians in West- chester County, is one of his direct descendants. In his qualities of perseverance and persistency in sup- port of principle, Dr. Sands strongly resembles his illustrious ancestry. He was born November 20, 1814, and was the second child of David Sands and Elizabeth Brady, of New Castle, N. Y. His father, who was a farmer and civil engineer, early sent him to the school at his native place, after which he also attended a higher academy at Sing Sing, N. Y. After leaving Sing Sing he spent a year or two in farming and study together. At the close of this time he en- tered the College of Physicians and Surgeons of the city of New York, graduating in 1840. Shortly after this he began the long and successful professional career, in Port Chester, which has ended not only in the possession of an extended and lucrative practice, but in winning a host of warm and steadfast friends. Dr. Sands has given much of his time to outside work. He is at present a director of the First Na- tional Bank of Port Chester. For over ten years he was trustee of the village, and is now its president. He is also health oflicer of the town and a member of the County Medical Society. He married, on the 27th of April, 1842, Miss Ann Maria Green, of Port Chester, and has had three children, — one daughter, who died in childhood, and two sons, who are still living. Morton J. Sands, M.D., the oldest, practices with his father, and Purdy G., the youngest, who holds the position of town clerk, is a civil engineer at Port Chester. Dr. Sands has also a grandchild, — Benjamin J., a son of Morton J. NORMAX K. FREEMAN. Norman K. Freeman, M.D., who is the oldest ])hysician in the southern portion of Westchester County, was born in Warren, Herkimer Countj', N. Y., May 3, 1814. The ancestors of the family were three brothers who came from the north of England, where the home is still found, in the latter part of the seventeenth century. They landed in Philadelphia, but one of them went to Massachusetts, and has many descendants in that jjortion of the country and in the northern part of this State. Another of the brothers was drowned in the Delaware River, and his widow, with the surviving brother, made their home at Woodbridge, N. J., where four generations oi' their descendants are interred in the old buryiiig-ground. Thomas Freeman, one of the descendants, was a soldier of the Revolution and a prisoner in the Sugar- House in New York, and on board a prison ship, from which he escaped by swimming. He married Sallie Moore, of Scotch descent. Their children were John, Smith, Ariel, Thomas, Linus, Moores, Rachel (wife of Moses Freeman, her cousin), Polly (wife of Thomas Edgar) and Henry. Of these children, Henry Free- man was born June 21, 1789. In his early manhood he learned the trade of a carpenter and subsequently went to Warren, where his uncle Isaac resided, and was the builder of the first mill in that place. He remained there till 1822, when he removed to Rich- field, Otsego County, and purchased a farm on the west side of Canaderago Lake, which he made his home until his death, in 1869. He married, in 1813, I Mercy, daughter of Holden and Rhoda Sweet, of Berlin, Rensselaer County, N. Y. Their children were Norman K. ; George S., born August 25, 1815, and died unmarried Jan. 30, 1840; Emily, born Oct. 21, 1816 (wife of Borelli Ingalls) ; and Delos, born April 22, 1819. He died August 8, 1843, without descendants. Dr. Norman K. Freeman remained on his father's farm, attended the district school, then taught school and worked by the month for the neighboring farm- ers, giving half his wages to his father and educat- ing himself with the remainder. At the age of twenty- one he went to New York and served, until 1837, as a clerk in a store on Maiden Lane. In 1838 he returned to Richfield, and studied medicine with Dr. Alonzo Churchill. Two years later he went to Geneva and continued his studies under the instruction of Dr. Thomas Spencer, who was then president of the Ge- neva Medical College. He graduated February 8, 1842, and his diligence and skill were so well known to Dr. Spencer that he was received by him as a part- ner. In the fall of that year he Wiis comj)elled, by the failing health of his brother Delos, to accompany him on a trip to the South, and after his death oc- 592 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. curred, in 1843, he came to Westchester and began practice with Dr. Wm. Bayard, a physician of great local prominence. He remained with Dr. Bayard till June, 1845, and then established a practice on his ovfn account, which he has continued with unabated zeal to the present. He was thephysician of St. John's College, at Fordham, from 1845 till 1850, when the failure of his health compelled him to retire to his farm in Richfield. He remained there till 1852, and then returned and resumed his practice, and purchased a homestead of William Simpson, on the west bank of Bronx River, which he has since made his resi- dence. Under the administration of President Fill- more, he was for three years postmaster at West Farms, and was assistant inspector of the Metropolitan Board of Health while it continued to have an exist- ence. Dr. Freeman was married, October 17, 1837, to Ann Elizabeth, daughter of Samuel W. Lowerre, of New York City, by whom he had four sons. Only two are now living, — Norman, who is a broker in New York, and Wm. Francis, who is in business in the city of Albany. Both are married and have children. It is safe to say that there is no man to whom West Farms is more indebted for its present efBcient Union schools than to Doctor Freeman. His exertions in this respect were crowned with well-merited suc- cess, though his efforts met with the most determined opposition from many who might have been expected to show better judgment. The Union school established by his active zeal and determination was the first organized in the State under the act of 1853. For twenty-one years he was a member of the Board of Education, and for twenty years of that time clerk of the board. He was one of the first to anticipate the time when the t^parsely settled districts of Morrisania and West Farms would become thickly populated portions of New York City, ' and he was among the foremost in promoting the cause of annexation. In all his views he has ever been greatly in advance of his times, and has had the satisfaction of seeing them in course of time adopted by the community, which at first opposed them. A strong advocate of temperance, his practical devdtion to the cause has been a prominent feature of his life, and the reward of his temperance is found in the fact, that at the age of seventy-two, and after a life of constant and severe labor, he is to-day as hale and hardy as a man of fifty. During his professional career his practice embraced a very large portion of the county, and there is no one who is a better representative of its local practitioners. DR. JAMES BATHGATE. The parents of Dr. James Bathgate, who is well known as the oldest resident physician in Morrisania, were Charles and Margaret Bathgate, who came from Scotland, and settled at West Farms. Their children were Charles and John (both deceased), Dr. James Alexander (now living in Morrisania), Jane, the wife of William J. Beck (deceased), of West Farms, and Margaret Ann. The father of this family was a skillful agriculturist, and noted for his superior horses and cattle, which he raised on his farm. He removed from West Farms to Morrisania, where the younger children were born. James first attended school at Harlem, from whence he went to Mount Pleasant Academy, at Sing Sing. He was subsequently a student in the University of the City of New York, and studied medicine with Professor Joseph M. Smith, one of the professors of the College of Physi- cians and Surgeons, and graduated from that institu- tion in 1847. He was for three years assistant and resident physician in the Medical Department of the New York Hospital, and subsequently physician in the New York Dispensary, but his health failing, he removed from New York and settled at Morrisania upon a farm which was purchased from Gouverneur Morris. From that time to the present Dr. Bathgate has devoted his time and attention to the practice of his profession. He is a member of the State Medical Association, and takes an active interest in all that tends to advance its interests, and he enjoys a very extensive practice in Morrisania and the surrounding country. During his long practice at Morrisania he has never failed to command the confidence and re- spect of the community, in which his professional services have been uniformly successful. In political affairs he is a strong supporter of the principles of the Republican party, but without being a politician in the common acceptation of the term. The Bath- gate estate, in Morrisania, which is now rendered ex- tremely valuable by the advancement of New York City, is a farm purchased from Gouverneur Morris. The estate is bounded on the east by the old Patent Line, which separates Morrisania from the patent of West Farms. It is bounded on the west by the Mill Brook, and extends south to the tract which was bought by Jordan L. Mott and others, who founded the new village of Morrisania, the south line being near One Hundred and Seventieth Street, and the north line a short distance south of One Hundred and Seventy-fifth Street. The residence of Dr. Bathgate is very pleasantly situated on the west side of Third Avenue, and still retains much of the rural beauty that once distin- guished it, and here he enjoys a quiet home in the com|)any of his brother and sister, who are, like him- self, unmarried. St. Paul's Church, of Morrisania, is on the south side of the estate, and the church lot was presented to the congregation by this family. JAMES W- SCRIBNER. Dr. James W. Scribner was born at Tarrytown, January 17, 1820. His grandfather, Enoch Scribner, was a resident of Bedford, Westchester County, to which place he is supposed to have moved from Con- necticut, and died July 18, 1848, at the age of eighty. He married Mary Miller, and they were the parents 1 I THE MEDICAL of two sons, Joseph M. and James W. The former was born May 11, 1793, and was a prominent physi- cian. He married Rebecca, daughter of Thomas Ward, of Sing Sing, of a family long known in this county, and died December 28, 1847, leaving four children, — Dr. James W., John C, Mary (wife of Robert Jameson) and Philip W. His son, James W., attended the public schools until he was fifteen years old, when he was transferred to the collegiate school of Bedford, of which Samuel Holmes was principal. Having acquired a good classical education, he com- menced the study of medicine with his father, who was then, and had been for many years, one of the physicians in charge of the Westchester County almshouse, where the son had ample opportunity of seeing much practice while yet a student. After at- tending three courses of lectures at the College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York, he graduated as " M.D." in 1847. The next year he began practice in his native town, and continued it until the close of his life, being invariably favored with a large, remunerative and responsible practice. He became his father's successor in the profession, and was appointed to fill his place at the Almshouse. During his entire life Dr. Scribner held a high position among his professional brethren in the county. So acute were his perceptions, so widely read was he in his profession, and so skillful in ap- plying his acquirements to practical use, that if he had made a si)ecialty of any one department of med- icine, he would have become renowned as a leader in it. But he devoted himself to general practice, and was satisfied to gain a local reputation as a skill- ful physician, surgeon and obstetrician. It is seldom that any one becomes as accomplished in all these divisions of practical medicine as was Dr. Scribner. His counsel was frequently sought by physicians at a distance, and in his own neighborhood he was the one always sent for when consultation was required in cases of prolonged illness or in emergencies. He was devoted to his profession and to the friends he had acquired in following it, and could seldom be induced to withdraw himself from his work for relax- ation or amusement. During the last year of his life, while suffering from the acute pains of a malignant disease and from the depression naturally arising from it, he attended regularly to business day and night, without murmur or complaint, ministering unto hundreds who were far less in need of help than he was himself, until his force was all expended, and he laid down his labor and his life together. In all his professional relations he was pre-eminently a silent man, never gossiping about his cases in the sick room, and seldom indulging in conversation, even upon topics of general interest. Though digni- fied and courteously reserved in his intercourse with the world, among his friends he was always cheerful and fully enjoyed light amusements and harmless jokes. PROFESSION. 593 Dr. Scribner's professional silence grew out of his hatred for shams of all kinds. His profession was to cure, not to amuse, and he never sought to win suc- cess by any means outside of his .skillful treatment of cases. Operations of a complicated nature and re- quiring the highest skill were performed by him; but his modesty kept him from rej)orting the cases, and they remain unknown to all except the ones who were directly benefited by his art. It is needless to say that his moral and professional worth were alike appreciated by the entire commu- nity. For several years he was elected president of the village, held the highest offices in the Westches- ter County Medical Society, and was a delegate to the National Medical Association in 1871. He was also a member of the New York State Medical So- ciety and of the American Medical Association, and an honorary member of the California State Medical Society. For several terms he was chosen president and director of the Westchester County Agricultural Society, and was an able and efficient member of the Board of Education of Tarrytown. He married Margaret E. Miller, and left two daughters, — Josie and Ella. By his death, which occurred January 28, 1880, the community suflered an irreparable loss; all classes mourned him as a friend, and it was with feelings of no common vener- ation that his friends and neighbors bore to their final home the remains of one who had been in all the relations of life a useful and honored man. SAMUEL SWIFT. Samuel Swift, M.D., is descended from an old English family who came to New England at an early date. His immediate ancestors were residents of Dorchester, Mass. He was born in Brooklyn, N. Y., August 5, 1849, his father, Samuel Swift, being then a prosperous merchant in New York. His mother was Mary, daughter of Samuel Phelps, of West Hampton, Mass., of a family well known in the history of that portion of the country. Dr. Swift re- sided in Brooklyn till 1858, when he went to Massa- chusetts and entered Williston Seminary. In 1865 he entered Yale College, and graduated in 1868 with the degree of Ph.B. In the fall of 1869 he joined the Medical Department of Cambridge University, where he remained one year. He then entered the Medical Deparnuent of Columbia College, and was also a private pupil of Dr. T. M. Markoe. In 1872 he graduated and received the diploma of M.D., and was the valedictorian of his class. After completing his studies he made a short tour to Europe, where he spent six months, principally in Germany. Previous to his trip he had been appointed resident physician at the " Nursery and Child's Hospital," in New York, obtaining this position by a successful competitive examination ; after completing his services there he was for a time connected with the Northeastern Dispensary. 50+ HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. In the fall of 1873 he came to Yonkers, where he has since resided. Here he entered into a business partnership with Dr. J. Foster Jenkins, a physician of great skill and reputation, and this connection con- tinued till the death of Dr. Jenkins, in 1882. In his profession Dr. Swift has attained an enviable and well-merited reputation. He is a member of the Medical Society of the State of New York, of the New York Academy of Medicine, of the Westchester Medical Society, the Jenkins Medical Society of Yonkers and the Boylston Medical Society of Boston, Mass. He has always been identified with the Demor cratic party, and in 1882 was elected mayor of the city of Yonkers. He has also been president of the Board of Education, and is justly recognized as a prominent and useful citizen and a skillful medical practi- tioner. He married Lucy, daughter of Hon. Henry E. Davis, late judge of the Court of Appeals of New York, and has one child, JIartha. He is a member of St. Paul's Episcopal Church, where he has served as vestryman since 1877, and is at present junior warden of the church. AUGUSTUS VAX CORTLAXDT. Dr. Augustus Van Cortlandt was born August 31, 1826, and died December 24, 1884. He was the son of Frederick Augustus Van Cortlandt and Harriet, daughter of Peter Jay Munro, of Mamaroneck. His paternal grandfather was James Morris, of Morrisania, and his grandmother Helen Van Cortlandt. His father took the name of Van Cortlandt to inherit an estate at Lower Yonkers, now called King's Bridge. The house in which Dr. Van Cortlandt was born was afterwards purchased, with a small portion of the property, by Hon. Waldo Hatchings. Dr. Van Cortlandt was sent at an early age to a school at White Plains. He had a wonderful memory and learned very rapidly. When the California fever broke out he went to California, and upon his return to New York began the study of medicine. When the war opened he joined the Ninth New York Regi- ment and went to Washington. With a number of others, he shortly left the Ninth and joined the Twelfth. On the return of his regiment he went out with the Seventh. On returning home he was sent to David's Island as physician. Subsequently he commenced the practice of medicine in New Rochelle, which he continued until his death. His practice was never very remunerative, being principally among the poor, by whom he seemed to be much beloved. PIERRE CORTLANDT VAX AVYCK. Pierre Cortlandt Van Wyck, M.D., was born at the old Van Cortlandt Manor-house, on the banks of the Croton River, September 24, 1824. His father, Philip Gilbert Van Wyck, was the nephew and adopted son of General Philip Van Cort- landt, who died a bachlor and left his large estate, including the Van Cortlandt Manor, to be divided between his two nephews, Pierre Van Cortlandt and Philip G. Van Wyck. Dr. Van Wyck's mother was Mary Smith Gardiner, daughter of Colonel Abraham Gardiner, who was one of the lineal descendants of Lion Gardiner, of Gardi- ner's Island. Coming of a race of those who had from the earliest history of the country been foremost in patriotism, generosity and the development of all the nobler traits of human nature, descended from the Van Cortlandts, Van Rensselaers, Gardiners and Van Wycks, whose names are so intimately interwoven with the early history of our own country, he never forgot the traditions of his ancestry, but was always the genial, high-toned, honorable gentleman. Beginning life under these favorable auspices, he entered Princeton College and graduated with the class of 1845. He began the study of medicine under the care of Dr. Adrian K. Hoffman. He was afterwards a student at the College of Physicians and Surgeons of New York, where he enjoyed the benefit of the instruc- tions of the celebrated Dr. Willai'd Parker. He graduated in 1849, and was afterwards appoint- ed by President Taylor, United States inspector of drugs, at the port of New York. While holding this position he became interested in the firm of Radway & Co., in which he still held an interest at the time of his death. In 1862 he was appointed by President Lincoln assessor of internal revenue for the Fourth District of New York. He organized the district and continued to admin- ister it ably and efficiently until it was consolidated in 1871. In .January, 1882, President Arthur ap- pointed him superintendent of the United States Assay Office in New York, to succeed Mr. Thomas C. Acton, who was made Assistant Treasurer of the United States. In politics he was a Whig until 1856, when he joined the Republican party during the Fremont cam- paign. He had always been prominent in the coun- cils of his party and was many times sent as a dele- gate to State and National Conventions, and was one of the famous three hundred and six who voted so persistently for General Grant at Chicago in 1880. When the nomination of General Garfield was announced. Governor Dennison of Ohio, came to the New Y''ork delegation and said that any candidate they named for Vice-President would be nominated. Dr. Van Wyck proposed the name of Chester A. Arthur, which was unanimously indorsed. Dr. Van Wyck had been the personal friend of President Arthur for twenty years, and was with him on that memorable night of September 19, 1881, THE .MEDICAL PROFESSION. 595 when the sad news came that President Garfield had passed away, and he was one of the nine persons present when the oath of ofBce was administered by Judge Brady to the new President during the silence and solemnity of the midnight hour. Dr. Van Wyck had a brilliant mind, cultivated by deep study and extensive foreign travel, combined with refined and artistic tastes. He lived and died a bachelor. He was a man of domestic habits, and de- voted himself to the care and comfort of his sisters, Miss Joanna L. Van Wyck and Mrs. Annie V. R. Wells, who resided with him at the Van Wyck man- sion, Grove Hill, in the village of Sing Sing. This had always been the seat of generous and refined hos- pitality, and it was at this home that he died sud- denly, of pneumonia, on the 23d day of April, 188;;. The funeral was largely attended, not only by hi> associates and friends in his own circle of life, but by all his numerous ten- antry and the poor of the surrounding country, who found him always a friend and brother to each and all, irrespective of race or creed. Of him it may well be said : " Write me as one that loves his fellow- men." The interment took place in the family burial ground at Croton, where repose the remains of those sterling Revolution- ary patriots, Lieutenant Governor Pierre Van Cortlandt and his sons. General Philip and General Pierre, and of his grandsons, General Philip G. Van Wyck and Recorder Pierre C. Van Wyck and numerous other members of the Van Cortlandt and Van Wyck families. Of the ancestry of Dr. Van Wyck a few words may be added. Cornelius Barentse Van Wyck came to America in 1660, from Wyck, a town on the river Teck in Hol- land. He married Anna Polhemus ; their son Theo- dorus who was born September 17, 16tiS, and died December 4, 17')3, married Margaretta Brinckehoff, February 3, 168.5. They were the parents of eight children, one of whom* Abraham, who was born No- vember 7, 1695, married Catherine Provost in 1717. Of their nine children, the eldest, Theodorus, born November 30, 1718, married Helena Sanford, August 2, 1740, and they were the parents of twelve children ; one of their sons, Abraham, was born in 1748, and married Catherine, daughter of Lieut. Gov. Pierre Van Cortlandt, January 7, 1776. Their children were Theodorus, Pierre Cortlaudt, Van Wyck (who was for many years Recorder for the City of New York) and Philip Gilbert Van Wyck, who. was born June 4, 1786, and married Mary Smith, daughter of Col Abra- ham Gardiner, and granddaughter of David Gardiner, fourth proprietor of Gardiner's Island. Their chil- dren were Joanna Livingston Van Wyck, now resid- ing at Sing Sing; Catherine, wife of Stephen H. Bat- tin ; Philip Van Cortlandt, who died unmarried, Jan- uary 12,1842; Eliza, wife of William Van Ness Liv- ingston, who died Decem- ber 9, 1865 ; Gardiner, who died unmarried, April 7, 1860 ; Annie Van Rens- selaer, who married the late Hon. Alexander Wells, of the Supreme Bench of California, and whose only child, Ger- trude Van Cortlandt, mar- ried Schuyler Hamilton, Jr., great-grandson ot Alexander Hamilton ; David Gardiner, who died unmarried, December 16, 1848, and Dr. Pierre Cort- landt Van Wyck, the subject of this article. The Van Wycks of Holland, are an aristo- cratic and wealthy fami- ly, and continue to bear the same coat of arms as those brought by the Van Wycks to this country upwards of two centuries ago. HEXRY K. HUXTIXGTOX. The first known ancestor of Henry K. Huntington, ^I. D., in America, was one to whom tradition ^has assigned the name of Simon. He \vas an English- man, and in 1633 started with his wife and family for this country. His death occurred during the voyage, and his son Christopher, who succeeded to the pater- nal cares, brought the family first to Norwich, Conn., and finally to Windham, in the same State, where a permanent settlement was effected. The branch of the family from which Dr. Huntington is descended has apparently remained within a short distance of the original homestead, for we find by an examina- 596 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. tion of the records that Samuel Howard Huntington, his father, who was born December 14, 1793, was married in Hartford October 19, 1835, the lady being his second wife. Her name was Sarah Blair Watkin- son, and she was a daughter of Robert Watkinson, a merchant residing in Hartford. Henry K., their son, was born at Hartford March 27, 1845. He remained in his native town till 1862, in which year, having meanwhile graduated from the Hartford public school, he entered Trinity College. In 1867, after graduating there, he made a first at- tempt at self-support. Proceeding as far west as Racine, Wis., he engaged as a tutor in the college there. A year's experience as an instructor, how- ever, convinced him that teaching was not his forte, and at the end of the first term he resigned his posi- tion at Racine, with the intention of studying medicine. Retracing his steps, he came eastward, and in 1868 entered the Univer- sity (medical college) of the city of New York, from which he graduated in 1871. The success which has attended him as a physician, has con- vinced him, as well as his many friends, that he made no mistake in his second choice of a pro- fession. Immediately fol- lowing his graduation, he devoted sixteen months to service in the Charity Hospital on Black- well's Island. As a reward for the profi- ciency with which he had performed his du- ties there, he was commissioned in 1872 with the re-organization of the Convalescent Hospital on Hart's Island, and to him is due the credit of originating what is now known as the Hart's Island Hospital. On the 23d of September, 1873, he removed to New Rochelle, where he still resides. By careful attention to the needs of his patients and faithfulness in the per- formance of his professional duties, he has won for himself not only a large and extended practice, but also the esteem of bis fellow-townsmen He is a member of Trinity Episcopal Church, was formerly a trustee of the public schools and is con- nected with the County and State I\Iedical Associa- tions. He is at present physician to the Board of Health of the town of New Rochelle. Dr. Huntington married Sept. 23, 1873, MissMoruca Frances De Figaniere, and has no children. He is one of the most successful physicians in the county. MAXIMILIAN JOSEPH EEINFELDER. Maximilian Joseph Reinfelder, M.D., was born in Munich, Kingdom of Bavaria, March 4, 1821. His father, Ferdinand Reinfelder, was a surgeon in the military academy of that capital, where he was in active service thirty-three years. From his four- teenth year Dr. Reinfelder paid great attention to the study of the natural sciences, especially chemis- try, in which he graduated from the University of Munich in 1844. From 1847 to 1850 he pursued his medical studies there. Attracted by the large field of usefulness which America affords to scien- tific men as medical prac- titioners, as well as by his natural and unconquer- able predilection for this country almost from his childhood, he came to the United States in 1854. Notwithstanding the thoroughness of his Euro- pean medical education, he matriculated at the Univereity Medical Col- lege, in New Y'ork City. His object in doing this was to familiarize him- selt with American medi- cal authorities, and iden- tify himself with Ameri- can interests; also to ob- serve and study the great changes which took place during twenty years in all branches of medical science. Having fin- ished the courses pre- scribed in the school of medicine, he was graduated in 1869, receiving, be- side his regular diploma, a certificate of honor, as an evidence of having pursued a fuller course of medical instruction than that usually followed by students. He continued the practice of medicine in Yonkers, where he has been located for the last thirty-one years. He is a man of acknowledged reputation in the pro- fession, and is at present consulting physician to St. John's Riverside Hospital. He is a Fellow of the New York Academy of Medicine, and also a mem- ber of the Westchester Medical Society. He was married, in 1854, to^ Miss A. Merz, of Lin- dau. Lake Constance, Bavaria, and has one daughter, Armina J., who resides with him at the present time. He is now a gentleman of advanced years. By THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 597 carelul attention to the wants of his patients, and strict economy in the management of his private af- fairs, he has accumulated for himself an extensive practice and a moderate fortune. He is greatly re- si)ected in the city of his adoption both as a private citizen and an influential physician. RALPH BAKXARD GRI.sWOLD. The family of Ralph Barnard Griswold, M.D., was originally English. The first ancestor in this coun- try was Roger Griswold, who came to New London, Conn., before the Revolution, and it is supposed that Fort Griswold, near that city, was named after some of the members of the family. Ralph Barnard Gris- wold, M.D., son of Lucius and Julia Elizabeth (Bar- nard) Griswold, was born at Colebrook, Litchfield County, Conn., January 18, 1835. His parents moved to the thriving vil- lage of Winsted in 1848, where he attended the district school, after which he became a pupil of St. James' School, taught by Revs. Jonathan and James R. Coe. He taught school in the academy at Winchester Centre and also nine months at Stroudsburg, Pa. His success was so great there that he was urged to tarry longer. For years, however, it had been his desire to become a physician, and while yet en- gaged as a teacher in Stroudsburg, he fully de- cided to exe- cute this purpose. He read medicine with H. B. Steele, M.D., of Winsted, Conn., and attended his first course of lectures at the College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, and a full course at the Eclectic Medical Insti- tute of Cincinnati, O., where he graduated in Feb 1857. It had been his father's wish that he should spend some time in Europe to further advance his medical education, but being of an ambitious turn of mind, and having confidence in his own ability, he decided not to accept the kind offer thus made. In April, 1857, he came to North Castle, where he immediately began the practice of medicine and has succeeded in building up a business second to none in this part of the county. He is now called to Stanwich, Round Hill, Armonk, Bedford, New Castle and Long Ridge, and is the leading physician in North Castle, his post-office address being Banksville, Fairfield County, Conn. He is town physician and is also health officer of the Board of Health. He joined the Methodist Episcopal Church at Winsted, Conn., in his seventeenth year, and in 1857 brought his letter from this church to the Middle Patent Methodist Church, where he has been an acceptable member for twenty-eight years, hold- ing the offices of trustee, steward and chorister from the time of his arrival to the present. He has been since his earliest recollection connected with Sabbath- schools, either as a pupil, superintendent or teach- er. For fifteen years Dr. Griswold has managed the financial matters of the church of which he is a member, and has rendered valuable service in the collection of funds neces- sary for its support. May 1, 1858, he married Mary Jane Early. Four children were born to them, of whom William L. Griswold, Ph.B., M.D., now practicing medicine in Greenwich, Conn., and Julia Alice Griswold are still living. Hehas held the office of commissioner of highways of his town for five consecutive terms of three years each, and still holds the position. He has also been tendered the nomination for su- pervisor, but owing to- pressure of pr ofessional business, has been obliged to decline the honor. He has always been a temperance man, and became espec- ially active in that work in 1870, when he assisted in organizing the Middle Patent Division of the Sons of Temperance. He was made its first Worthy Patriarch, and some three years afterward was elected Grand Worthy Patriarch of the Grand Division "Sons of Tem- perance " of Eastern New York, embracing in itsjuris- diction some thirteen counties of the State. He is also an ex-officio member of the National Division of the same association. He has always been a consistent Republican, not having missed either a town or State election in over twenty-eight years. He has identified himself, irrespective of party, church or state,, with any and every cause which bethought was for the 598 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. benefit of the community, being always ready to lend a helping hand. He has often, after a day of toil or a thirty or forty-mile ride, driven away again some five miles to drill or take charge of a company of singers in giving a concert or entertainment for some weak society. His liberal tendencies, together with his cordial disposition and the valuable services which he has in times past and still con- tines to render the community in which he lives, have endeared him to its people and made his name an honor to the county of his adoption. AVALTON .JAY CARPENTER. Walton Jay Carpenter, M.D., is descended from an English family who came to New England during the seventeenth century. From thence a branch re- moved to the town of Pur- chase, in Westchester County, where they took up land and engaged in farming. Charles B. Car- jienter, father of Walton Jay, was of this line. He married Rachel White, and of their five children, Dr. Carpenter was the oldest. He was born in Duauesburgh, Schenec- tady County, N. Y., Sep- tember 11, 1852, and re- moved with his family ■when but four years of age to Illinois. After a stay of two years in the West the family returned to Duanesburgh where the youth attended the public school, leav- ing at the age of fifteen for the Delaware Literary In- stitute,where he passed two winters. A period of three years, divided between teaching and study followed ; then a two years" course of select studies at Union College and a term of medical preparation under the celebrated professor. Dr. Alfred Loomis, of New York. In the fall of 1875 he entered the medical department of the Univer- sity of the City of New York, and finally fin- ished his course in the spring of 1877, when he graduated. He first settled at Round Hill, Connecticut, where he practiced for a few months, in connection with his uncle, J. C. White, M.D. ; but this town not offering the advantages which he craved, he returned to New Y^ork City and entered upon a post-graduate course at the University, after completing which in 1878 he removed to Katonah, where he still resides. He has by care and industry succeeded in building up for himself an extensive practice, and has during his residence in Katonah effected many cures which will render his reputation permanent and bis presence in the place a continual agency for good. He is a member of the Methodist Church of Katonah, and also a member of the following Masonic organiza- tions : Kisco Lodge, No. 708 ; Croton Chapter, No. 202 ; and Crusade Commandery, No. 56. He married April 30, 1884, Miss Anna L. Green, daughter of Alsoph Green, of Katonah. Dr. Carpenter is connected with the Westchester Medical Society, among the members of which he is widely known and as widely respected- CHAPTER XIII. I.ITERATl'KE AND LITERA- RY MEN, OF WESTCHES- TER COUNTY. BY j. thos. scharf, a.m., ll.d Westchester County has good reason to pride herself on her contribu- tions to the literature ot the country. Few, if any, counties in the Union, can show an equally brilliant record. She has given birth to many noted wri- ters and has nurtured many more. The great- est literary genius, proba- bly, that our country has produced, the weird, uncan- ny Poe, found inspiration within her borders, on the banks of the lordly Hudson, and that sunny, facile intellect which dwelt in the pure and lofty brow of Washington Irving found equal delight in exploring the mystic nooks and windings of its " Sleepy Hollows." Feni- more Cooper, the great pioneer of American fiction, roamed over its rugged hills and through its pleasant meadows, and treading close upon his heels came James Kirke Paulding, Irving's friend and collabora- teur, whose strong Americanism was quite as pure and unadulterated as was that of the patriotic Cooper. Among political writers, Westchester pre- sents the great names of Hamilton, Tom Paine, Sea- bury, Wilkins, the Jays, Gouverneur Morris, Daniel LITERATURE AND LITERARY MEN. 599 D. Tompkins, John Bigelow, Horace Greeley, James Watson Webb, besides a host of lesser celebrities. George Washington, tliough not, projierly si)eaking, a literury character, deserves to be included among those who have transmitted noble tlioughts as well as noble deeds to his countrymen. His association with the people of Westchester County during the Revolution- ary era is fully set forth elsewhere in this work. Among his writings are to be found vivid bits of description of AV^estchester localities, with which he became familiarized in passing through tlie county. The Sparks collection of Washington's writings fills twelve large octavo volumes. His first ap[)earance as an author was in the publication, in 1754, at Williams- burg, Ya., and in London, of his journal of his pro- ceedings " To and from the French of the Ohio," a brief tract written hastily from the rough notes taken on his exjjedition. His State papers, correspondence and " Farewell Address " are too well known to need description here. Major John Andre, whose mournful fate is indissolubly linked with the glorious deeds of Washington, spent the closing days of his career in Westchester. He was a poet as well as a soldier and an accomplished man of letters. Daniel D. Tompkins, Yice-President of the United States, belongs to the political, rather than to the literary history of Westchester County, although his talents as a speaker and writer, entitle him to recog- nition as a man of letters. He was a native of Scars- dale. Samuel J. Tilden may be included in the same category, and can be claimed as one of the celebri- ties of Westchester County, where, at his beautiful estate " Greystone," he spends much of his time in elegant and scholarly retirement. General John C. Fremont, the soldier, explorer, author and politician, resided at one time at Mount Pleasant, in the house built by General James Wat- son Webb. His wife, who is the daughter of Senator Benton, of Missouri, is a woman of great accomplish- ments and decided literary tastes. General Fremont, who was born at Savannah, Ga., January 21, 1813, is known to literature by his graphic reports, which were published by the federal government, of his Western explorations. Devoting himself in early life to civil engineering, he obtained an appointment in the government expedition for the survey of the head- waters of the Mississippi, and was afterwards employed at Washington preparing maps of the country ex- plored. In 1842, at the head of a small force, he crossed the Rocky Mountains and opened to com- merce and emigration the Great South Pass. His report of his adventures was so interesting that it was reprinted by publishers in this country and in England and was translated into various foreign lan- guages. He next accomplished an expedition to Oregon, and, striking southward and westward, after incredible hardships, succeeded in exploring the re- gion of Alta California, including the Sierra Nevada, the valleys of San Joaquin and Sacramento and the gold region. Returning to Washington in 1844, he published another report, and upon its completion set out on another exi)edition to the Pacific, tlie re- sult of which was the acquisition of California by the United States. He was sent to Washington in 1850 as the first United States Senator from California. In 1856 he was the Republican candidate for Presi- dent of the United States and during the Civil War held a commission as major-general in the Union army. A superb edition of his reports, entitled "Fre- mont's Exi)iorations," was published in 1859. Among other names associated with the history of Westchester County which have attained to distinc- tion in literature are those of J. Rodman Drake, John Savage, William Leggett, Robert Rogers, David Humphreys, Guliau C. Verplanck, Ann Eliza Bleeck- er, Mrs. Haven, James Parton, Rev. Thomas Allen, a chaplain of the Revolutionary army at White Plains, who took an active part in the political discussions of the time; Charles Tafin A rmand, the Marquis de la Rouarie, an eloquent and persuasive speaker and writer, who, in 1778, was actively engaged in West- chester County in opposing Simcoe, Emmerick and Baremore, the Loyalist, whom he captured near King's Bridge November 8, 1779; Aaron Burr, who was sta- tioned in Westchester County in the winter of 1778- 79, and whose duel with Hamilton took place at Weehawken ; Nathaniel Chipman, LL.D., the Ver- mont jurist, who participated in the battle of White Plains ; Joel Barlow, the author of the " Columbiad," and Rev. William Crosswell, D.D., clergyman and scholar, born at Hudson, November 7, 1804, and died at Boston November 9, 1851 ; James De Lancey, the jurist, born in 1703 and died in 1760; General Oliver De Lancey, of the British army, who fought at White Plains ; Horace Green, M.D., LL.D., the dis- tinguished physician and medical writer, who died at Greenmount, Sing Sing, N. Y., December 24, 1802; Rev. Freeborn Garretson Hibbard, D.D., at one time editor of the Northern Christian Advocate and author of several books, born at New Rochelle, February 22, 1811 ; James Macdonald, M.D., author of valuable papers on the treatment of insanity, born at White Plains, July 18, 1803, died at Flushing, Long Island, May 5, 1849; Alexander Slidell Mackenzie, the noted navalofEcerandauthorof the livesof Paul Jones, O. H. Perry, Stephen Decatur and many other works, born in New York, April (!, 1803, lived in Mount Pleasant, on the Sing Sing road, and died at Tarrytown, Septem- ber 13, 1848 ; Benjamin Moore Norman, the author of interesting books of travel, born at Hudson, De- cember 22, 1809, died near Summit, Miss., February 1, 1860 ; Rear Admiral Hiram Paulding, son of John Paulding, one of Andre's captors, and a distinguished naval officer and author of a " Journal of a Cruise Among the Islands ofthe Pacific," born in Westchester County, December 11, 1797; Calvin W. Philleo, the novelist, born at Yernon, July 14, 1822, died at Suf- 600 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. field, Conn., June 30, 1858; Winthrop Sargent, the soldier, statesman and writer, who fought at White Plains; Joseph Mather Smith, M.D., the eminent physician and medical writer, who was a native of New Rochelle; John Savage, the editor and poet, who lives at Fordham ; John Canfield Spencer, LL.D., lawyer and politician, a native of Hudson, who is known to the literary world for having edited the first American edition of De Tocqueville's " Democracy in America," with an original preface and notes ; William Leete Stone, the noted journalist, who, in 1813, edited the Herkimer American and afterwards a political paper at Hudson, becoming finally one of the proprietors of the New York Commercial Adver- tiser; Peter Van Schaack, LL.D., jurist, loyalist in the Revolutionary War and author, born at Kinder- hook, where he died, September 27, 1882; Aaron Ward, lawyer, politician and author, born at Sing Sing, July 5, 1790 ; Robert Watts, M.D., physician and medical writer, born at Fordham in 1812; and Thurlow Weed, the journalist and politician, born at Cairo, N. Y., November 15, 1797, and whose early life was passed as a cabin boy on the Hudson. Of contemporary writers, the following have been more or less identified with Westchester County : General Adam Badeau, author of the " History of General U. S. Grant," etc., who lived in North Tarry- town, Mount Pleasant, from boyhood until about 1856 ; Clarence Cook, the art critic, who attended school at Irving Institute, Tarrytown, and lived at Irvington; A. C. Wheeler ("Nym Crinkle"), poet and critic, who also attended school at Irving Institute and lived at North Tarrytown ; Charles A. Brace, author and philanthropist, who lived at Hastings ; Frank Vincent, Jr., author and traveler, who wrote " The Land of the White Elephant," " Through and Through the Tropics" and " Norsk, Lapp and Finn," and whose home is in Tarrytown ; Rev. William C. Wilkinson, D.D., formerly professor in Rochester Theological Seminary, who has written a critique on Arnold's " Light of Asia," etc., and who resides at Tarrytown ; Stephen H. Thayer, the poet, who wrote " Songs of Sleepy Hollow," and lives in North Tarry- town ; Latham C. Strong, poet and journalist, wlio wrote " Castle Windows," " Poke O'Moonshine," etc., and was a resident of North Tarrytown until his death; Hamilton Mabie, editor of The Christian Union, who lived in North Tarrytown ; Marshall H. Bright, editor of The Christian at Work, who lives in Tarry- town ; Rev. Pharcellus Church, D.D., the author of a number of books, reviews, etc., and a resident of Tarrytown ; Rev. Jacob Dutcher, author of " The Old Home by the River," who was born in Greenburgh ; Minna Irving, poetess, a contributor to The Century, whose full name is Minna Irving Odell,and who lives in Greenburgh ; Henry Drisler, scholar, author and professor, who lived in Greenburgh ; Rev. John A. Paine, professor in Robert College, Constantinople, archseologist to the Palestine Exploring Expedition, and author of a work on that subject, whose home is in Tarrytown ; Colonel Church, editor of The Army and Navy Journal; E. Z. C. Judson ("Ned Bunt- line "), who lived at Chappaqua; Dr. Edward Bright, editor of The Examiner, who lives at Yonkers ; and Robert B. Coffin (" Barry Gray "), who lives at Kato- nah. In music and the fine arts Westchester is also not without distinction. Among composers may be men- tioned George F. Bristow and Francis H. Nash, both residents of Morrisania ; and among painters, Albert Bierstadt, the famous landscape painter, who lived within the corporate limits of Tarrytown, and whose residence was destroyed by fire ; Francis W. Ed- monds, Edward W. Nichols, Tait, Gustave M. Ar- nolt, the young German painter of animals, and Samuel Fanshaw and Robert Hite, both of them emi- nent painters on ivory. Robert Walter Weir, the distinguished painter, who succeeded C. R. Leslie as instructor in drawing at West Point, was born at New Rochelle on June 18, 1808. The earliest of the Westchester County literati was Adrian Van der Donck, a graduate of the University of Leyden, who was appointed by the patroon of Rensselaerwick sheriff' of his colony, and came to New Netherland in 1642. In 1648 he was granted a tract of land at Yonkers. In the deed he was spoken of as Yonker Van der Donck, Yonker being the usual title of gentleman. His name appears among the signers of a tract, published at the Hague in 1650, describing the New Netherland. It has been translated by Mr. Henry C. Murphy for the New York Historical Soci- ety, and published by them, and also by James Len- ox, of New York. Owing to its attacks on the gov- ernment of Kieft and Stuyvesant, Van der Donck was denied access to the colonial records during the preparation of his " Description of New Netherland," which has been translated and occupies one hun- dred and six pages of the "New York Historical So- ciety's Collections," 1841. It describes the rural pro- ducts, animals and inhabitants of the colony. The date of the first edition is unknown. The second was published at Amsterdam, in 1656, by Ebert Nieu- wenhof, who introduced the work with a poetical preface. Right Rev. Samuel Seabury, D.D., first bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church, may be classed among the literary men of Westchester, from the fact that, while in charge of St. Peter's Church, Westches- ter, he wrote and published, anonymously, during the Revolutionary period, a series of pamphlets in de- fense of the crown, under the signature, it is said, of " A. W. Farmer." He was the son of Rev. Samuel Seabury, missionary of the Society for the Propaga- tion of the Gospel, at New London, Conn., and was born at Croton, November 30, 1729, and gradu- ated at Yale in 1748. He then went to Scotland to study medicine, but while in that country also de- voted his attention to theology, and was ordained by LITERATUllE AND LITEllARY MEN. 601 the Bisliop of London in 1758, and, on his return, settled at New Jkunswiek, N. J., as a missionary of tlie rroi)agation Society. In 1757 he removed to Ja- maica, and from thence, in 1766, to Westchester, where, in addition to his church, he had charge of a sciiool. The authorship of tlie '" Farmer " pamphlets, which were commonly attributed to him, caused him to be seized by the Whigs, in 1775, and carried to New Haven, where he was imprisoned. As the fact of the authorship could not be established by legal proof, he was suffered to return to Westches er, where he renewed his efforts in behalf of the Loyalist cause. Upon the Declaration of American Independence he removed to New York City. Here he remained until the close of the war, officiating part of the time as chaplain to the King's American Regiment, and jjracticiug medicine. In 1783, having been elected bishop of the diocese of Connecticut, he sailed for England and applied for consecration to the Arch- bi-hop of York, the See of Canterbury being va- cant. His application was refused, in consequence of the inability of the English bishops to dispense with the oath of allegiance to the crown. In August, 1784, he made a similar application to the bishops of the Scottish Church, by whom he was consecrated, at Aberdeen, November 14, 1784. In the spring of the following year he returned to America and began the discharge of his duties as bishop. He displayed con- siderable ability and force as a writer on a variety of topics, and rendered important services to his church in the arrangement of the Liturgy and other matters. He died February 25, 1796, at New Lon- don, Conn., where he had filled his father's place as rector of the church, besides discharging his epis- copal duties. The " Farmer " pamphlets have been attributed to Isaac Wilkins, and also to Dr. Chand- ler, Dr. Inglis and Dr. Myles Cooper, but it is believed they were written by Seabury. The strong- est evidence is found in the draft of a document in Seabury's own writing, in which he states that he was the author of a |)amplet, entitled " Free Thoughts on the Proceedings of the Congress at Philadelphia," which was published shortly after the first Congress broke up, and other publications which followed, all of them signed " A. W. Farmer." He also states that on the 19th of November, 1775, an armed force of one hundred horsemen came from Connecticut to his house, and, not finding him at home, beat his children to compel them to tell where their father was, " which, not succeeding, they searched the neigh- borhood and took him from his school, and, with much abusive language, carried him in great triumph to New Haven, seventy miles distant, where he was pa- raded through most of the streets, and their success celebrated by firing cannon, &c." At this time, ac- cording to his own statement, Dr. Seabury " lived at Westchester, in the then province of New Y'ork, and was, though not wealthy, yet in easy circumstances, and supported a large family — viz., a wife and si.\: 66 children — comfortably and decently ; that his income was at least £200 S^erl. p'' a"", arising from his Par- ish, Glebe & from a grammar School, in which he had more than 20 young Gentlemen, when the Re- bellion began." The "Free Thoughts " of Seabury, we are told, excited the bitterest feeling. It was re- printed in London, in 1775, " for Richardson & Ur- quhart, at the Royal Exchange." Mr. Trumbull says that " when coj)ies of these pamphlets fell into the hands of the Whigs, they were disposed of in such a manner as most emphatically to express detestation of the anonymous authors and their sentiments. Some- times they were publicly burned, with imposing for- mality ; sometimes decorated with tar and feathers [from the Turkey-buzzard, as ' the fittest emblem of the author's odiousncss '], and nailed to the whip- ping-post." Rev. Jonathan Boucher, writing of Sea- bury's authorship of the pamphlets, states that, " being attributed to another gentleman, he alone de- rived any advantage from them, for to him the Brit- REV. ISAAC WILKINS, D.D. ish government granted a handsome pension, whilst the real author [Seabury] never received a farthing." Who the spurious pensioner was, Mr. Boucher does not state. Bishop Seabury received the degree of A.M. from Columbia (then King's) College, N. Y., in 1761, and that of D.D. from the University of Ox- ford, England. His son Charles, a distinguished clergyman and father of Rev. Samuel Seabury, D.D., of New York, was born at Westchester, May 20, 1770. Isaac Wilkins, D.D., was born at Withywood in the Island of Jamaica, December 17, 1742, and was the son of Martin Wilkins, an eminent lawyer and judge, who came to New Y'ork in order to educate his son. His parents died when he was a child and his care and education devolved on his aunt, Mrs. Mary Macey, his mother's sister. He graduated at King's College in 1760, and was married, November 7, 1762, to Isabella, daughter of Hon. Lewis Morris. They resided at Morrisania for a year or two, when Mr. Wilkins purchased an estate known as Castle 602 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Hill Neck, in Westchester County. In 1772 he was sent to the Colonial Legislature from the borough of Westchester and took an active part in its proceed- ings until April, 1775, on the side of the Loyalists. As the reputed author of the "Westchester Farmer" pamphlets, he became obnoxious to the Whigs and was forced to leave for England, where he remained about a year, making eveiy effort to reconcile the dispute be- tween the colonies and the mother country. He then returned to his family, whom he removed from Castle Hill, which had been laid waste and made desolate, to Long Island, where, at Newtown and Flatbush, he resided until the peace. He sold his farm in 1784 and took his family to Nova Scotia, where he purchased a farm and returned to his agri- cultural pursuits. He was sent to the Assembly of the province, and soon after placed at the head of a com- mittee for the distribution of lands to the American refu- gee Loyalists. In 1798 he returned to New York, and while preparing for the ministry was called to the partial rectorship of St. Peter's, Westchester. As soon as he was ordained deacon he entered upon the discharge of his duties. He was ordained a priest by Bishop Provoost, January 14, 1801. He was now in the enjoyment of a pension from the British govern- ment of one hundred and twenty pounds per annum. In 1811 the degree of D.D. was conferred upon him by King's College. He died at the rectory in West- chester February 5, 1830, in his eighty-ninth year. Right Rev. William Heathcote De Lancey, D.D., D.C.L., Protestant Episcopal bishop of Western New York, was one of Westchester's most distinguished sons. He was born at Mamaroneck October 8, 1797, and died at Geneva, N. Y., April 5, 1865. He gradu- ated at Yale in 1817, studied theology under Bishop Hobart, was ordained deacon in 1819 and priest in 1822, and soon after became assistant to Bishop White in Philadelphia. He was annually chosen secretary of the Diocesan Convention of Pennsylvania from 1825 to 1830, and was secretary of the House of Bishops from 1823 to 1829. He was provost of the University of Pennsylvania from 1828 to 1833; trav- eled in Europe in 1835 and on his return, after the death of Bishop White, succeeded to the rectorship of St. Peter's, Philadelphia. In 1838 he was chosen fir>t bishop of the diocese of Western New York, and was consecrated May 9, 1839. The Hobart Free Col- lege at Geneva was chiefly indebted to his efforts for its maintenance. In 1852 he was a delegate to Eng- land from the Episcopal bishops of the United States, and was one of the recognized leaders of the High Church party. He received the degree of D.C.L. from the Oxford University in 1852 ; D.D. from Yale in 1828 and LL.D. from Union College in 1847. Thomas Paine, the noted political and atheistic wri- ter, is identified with Westchester County by the fact that for his Revolutionary services the State of New York granted him five hundred acres of land in New Rochelle, where he resided part of the time after his re- turn to the United States, in 1802. Paine was a native of Thetford, Norfolk, England, born January 29, 1737 ; died in New York City, June 8, 1809. His parentage was humble and his educational opportunities lim- ited. For a time he preached occasionally as a dis- senting minister, and in 1774, at the suggestion of Franklin, came to America. He soon became known as a writer of uncommon force and logic and an op- ponent of slavery. His celebrated pamphlet, " Com- mon Sense," in which he advocated the independence of the colonies, was published in January, 1776, and had an extraordinary influence in disseminating re- publican ideas. His subsequent publications were of inestimable benefit to the patriotic cause. He was out- lawed in England for his celebrated " Rights of Man," which appeared in 1791, in answer to Burke's " Re- flectionson the French Revolution," and in September, 1792, was elected a member of the French National Convention. In consequence of his outspoken op- position to the execution of Louis XVI., he narrowly escaped being put to death during the Reign of Ter- THO.MAS PAINE. ror. His remains were taken to England in 1819 by William Cobbett. A monument was erected to his memory in 1839, near his original burial-place in New Rochelle. The literary reputation of John Jay is chiefly that which attaches to his political character, but he is pre-eminently worthy of being ranked among the lit- erary men whom old Westchester has either pro- duced or nurtured. Of Huguenot descent and a native of New York City, born December 12, 1745, he graduated at Columbia College and was a delegate to the First Revolutionary Congress at the age of twenty-eight, three years later chief justice of his State, and subsequently minister to Spain and ne- gotiator of the peace with Great Britain, Secretary of State, Chief Justice of the United States and Gov- ernor of New York. Notwithstanding these various trusts, he was enabled to spend nearly thirty years of retirement in pleasant country life at Bedford, West- chester County, where he died on the 17th of May, LITERATURE AND LITERARY MEN. 603 1829, at the age of eighty-four. His life has been written by his son, William Jay. His national state papers, written when a member of the Continental Congress, and his contributions to the Federalist, were powerful aids to the patriot cause. His " Address to the People of Great Britain," in 1774, called forth ex- pressions of admiration from Jefferson. He was also the author of a number of other political treatises of great clearness and vigor. William Jay, second son of Chief Justice Jay, was also a person of decided literary talent. He was born June 16, 1789, graduated at Yale, and studied law at Albany under John B. Henry, until, compelled to abandon study by an affection of the eyes, he retired to his father's country-seat at Bedford. In 1812 he married the daughter of John McVickar, a New York merchant. He was appointed first judge of the county of Westchester by Governor Tompkins and was succes'iively reappointed by Clinton, Marcy and Van Buren. Throughout his life he was a prominent opponent of slavery and in this connection published m.iny addresses and pamphlets, which were collected by him in his " Miscellaneous Writings on Slavery," published at Boston in 1854. In 1832 he published " The Life and Writings of John Jay." He died at his residence in Bedford, October 14, 1858. John Jay, son of William Jay, born June 23, 1817, and a graduate of Columbia College in 1836, is also the author of several pamphlets on the slavery ques- tion, together with many other papers on topics of public interest. He studied law in the city of New York and was admitted to the bar in 1839. His residence of late years has been the old homestead at Bedford. In April, 1869, he was appointed minister to Austria and represented this country with dis- tinction at the Court of Vienna. Gouverneur Morris, the noted statesman and writer, was a native of Morrisania. The first of his ances- tors who emigrated to America was Richard Morris, who is said to have been an officer in Cromwell's army. He came to New York after a short residence in the West Indies and purchased an estate at Harlem, which was invested by the Governor with manorial rights. His son Lewis succeeded to the estate and during the last eight years of his life was Governor of New Jersey. His eldest son, Lewis, became a mem- ber of the New York Legislature. The second Lewis had four sons, of whom the youngest was Gouverneur, who was born January 31, 1752. At an early age he was placed in the family of M. Tetar, at New Ro- chelle, where he acquired a thorough knowledge of the French language. At the age of sixteen he graduated at King's College, distinguishing him- self by a floridaddress on " Wit and Beauty." He then studied law in the office of William Smith, colonial historian of New York, and at the age of eighteen began the publication of a series of anonymous news- paper articles against a proposition in the Assembly for raising money by emitting bills of credit. In 1775 he was elected a member of the Provincial Con- gress, in which he soon attracted attention by a speech on the mode of issuing a paper currency by the Continental Congress. Its chief suggestions were afterwards adopted by that body. In 1777 he was elected a member of the Continental Congress and the following winter was one of the committee appointed to inquire into the state of the army, then stationed at Valley Forge. He was also chairman of the committee appointed in 1779 to consider the dis- patches from the American commissioners in Europe, which were the basis of the subsequent treaty of peace. In the discussion of the question as to the jurisdiction of the State of New York over the New Hampshire grants, now the State of Vermont, Morris was supposed to be in favor of the independence of that region and consequently lost his election by the Legis- lature to Congress. He continued to reside in Philadel- phia and engaged in the practice of his profession. In the early part of 1780 he commenced the publica- GOUVERNEUR MORRIS. tion of a series of essays on the state of the national finances, which were then in a desperate condition. He attacked with great ability the laws making the receipt of paper money at a fixed value compulsory, and also those regulating the prices of commodities. In May, 1780, Morris was seriously hurt by being thrown from his carriage and it was necessary to amputate one of his legs. In 1781 he was appointed by Robert Morris, who had been placed at the head of the national finances, his assistant. He performed the duties of this position for three years and a half. In 1786 his mother died. Her life interest in the estate at Morrisania thus terminated, and the prop- erty passed into the possession of the second son, Staats Long Morris, a general in the British army, the eldest son, Lewis, having received his portion during his father's life-time. Gouverneur purchased the estate from his brother. In 1787 he took his seat as delegate from Pennsylvania in the convention 604 HTSTOKY OP WESTCHESTER COUNTY. which framed the Constitution of the United States. President Madison bears testimony to his exertions for the promotion of harmony, and states that the draft of the Constitution was placed in his hands to receive its finished form. In 1788 he sailed for France and in January, 1791, visited London by appointment of President Washington as a private agent to the British government to settle unfulfilled articles of the treaty of peace. During his stay in London he re- ceived his appointment as minister to France. During the troubled times of the Directory in Paris he con- ducted the affairs of his oflice with great tact and prudence. In August, 1794, he was succeeded by Monroe, his recall having been asked by the French government after the recall of Citizen Genet at the request of the United States. He next made a tour of Europe, and while in Vienna endeavored to secure the release of Lafayette from Olmiitz. In October, 1798, he returned home. In 1799 he was chosen United States Senator from New York. He sided in the Senate and for the remainder of his life with the Federalists. His term closed in March, 1803, after which he resided at Morrisania. On Christmas day, 1809, he married Miss Anne Carey Randolph, of Vir- ginia. Mr. Morris delivered funeral orations on Washington, Hamilton and Governor George Clin- ton and an inaugural discourse before the New York Historical Society on his election as president, and contributed frequently in the later years of his life to the New York Euening Post, the Examiner and the United States Gazette. He was an early advocate of the Erie Canal and chairman of the canal commis- sioners from their first appointment, in March, 1810, to the time of his death, which occurred November 6, 1816. His life, with selections from his corre- spondence and papers, by Jared Sparks, was published in 1822. In person he so closely resembled Wash- ington that he stood as a model of his figure for Houdon, the i-culptor. The association of Alexander Hamilton with the history of Westchester County is of a tragic char- acter, for it was at Weehawken that he lost his life in the duel with Burr, July 12, 1804. One of his best known productions — his description of the fate of Major Andre — also links him with the literary chron- icles of the county, and one of his strongest, political papers was his reply to Dr. Seaburys supposed " West- chester Farmer" pamphlets. Of Andre he wrote, " Never, perhaps, did any man suff"er death with more iustice or deserve it less." Of the famous Federalist, papers, Hamilton wrote fifty-one out of eighty-five numbers. His life and public services are too well known to require consideration here. His fame will chiefly rest upon his able adminstration of the Treas- ury Department. In the eloquent language of Web- ster, "he smote the rock of the national resources and abundant streams of revenue gushed forth. He touched the dead corpse of the public credit and it sprung upon its feet." James A. Hamilton, son of Alexander Hamilton, lived in Greenburgh, north of Dobbs Ferry, from 1835 until his death. He was the author of an interest- ing volume entitled "Reminiscences of Men and Events at Home and Abroad During Three-Quarters of a Century," published by Charles Scribner & Co., New York, 1869. General Alexander Hamilton, grandson of Alex- ander Hamilton, lives in Tarrytown, Greenburgh. He has written tragedies, poema, prose, etc., and is a highly cultivated and accomplished litterateur. David Humphreys, the soldier poet of the Revolu- lution, composed his " Address to the Armies of the United States of America" in 1782, while encamped at Peekskill, the foe being in possession of New York and Charleston. He was the son of a Congregational clergyman. Rev. Daniel Humphreys, and was born in Derby, Connecticut, in 1753. He was educated at Yale, where he formed a personal and literary friend- ship with Dwight and Trumbull. He entered the Rev- olutionary army, and became a member of Washing- ton's military family, with the rank of colonel. He wrote alife of General Putnam, and a number of poems and plays. After the war he resided with Washington at Mount Vernon, and when he became President, traveled with him to New York. Among his poetical productions is "Washington's Farewell to the Army," in verse. He held the diplomatic post of ambassador to Lisbon, 1794-1797, and minister to Spain, 1797-1802. He died at New Haven, February 21, 1818. Robert Rogers, the noted ranger and writer, nar- rowly escaped being captured by Lord Stirling's troops at Mamaroneck, so that his associations con- nected with Westchester County were not, perhaps, of the pleasantest character. He was then a colonel in the British service, commanding the Queen's Rangers. Alter the incident at Mamaroneck he went to England, and was succeeded in his command by Colonel Simcoe. He was a native of Dunbarton, New Hampshire, and early achieved reputation as comman- der of a company of Rangers during the French War. His name is perpetuated by "Rogers' Slide " on Lake George, so-called from the daring act of Rogers in escaping from the Indians by sliding down the steep face of the mountain to the shore of the lake. After many romantic adventures in this country and in Europe, he figured in 1775 as an ardent patriot. Washington, however, suspected him, and in June 1776, ordered his arrest. He professed to l)e on his way to off'er his services to Congress, which body ordered his return to New Hampshire. He soon after openly espoused the cause of the King. He was pro- scribed and banished by his native State, and his sub- sequent history is unknown. Rogers published in 1765, his "Journals," a spirited account of his early adventures as a ranger, and in the same year, " A Concise Account of North America." In the follow- ing year, he published a tragedy, "Ponteach," founded on scenes of frontier life. LTTERATTIRE AND LITERARY MEN. 605 Rev. Nathaniel Scudder Prime, D.D., author of a " Treatise on Baptism " and the " History of Long Island,'' died at Mamaroneck, March 27, 185(). He was born at Huntington, L. I., April 21, 1785 ; gradu- ated in 1804 at Princeton College, from which, in 1848, he received the degree of D.D., and was or- dained a Presbyterian minister October 24, 1809. In the spring of 1830 the Rev. Dr. Prime came to Sing Sing with his family from Cambridge, Washing- ton County, N. Y. He had been invited by the trustees of the Mount Pleasant Academy, in Sing Sing, to be its principal and had accepted the appoint- ment. Having been the principal of the academy in Cambridge, he brought several pupils with him, and a high reputation as a scholar and teacher. Dr. Prime was a very remarkable man. His father and grandfiither were men of learning, and he him- self had made great attainments in the ancient languages, j)hilosophy and mathematics. There was probably no superior to him as a teacher in this country at that time. His two eldest sons, Alanson Jeimain and Samuel Iren;eus, were associated with him in the work of instruction. The Female Seminary in Sing Sing, then under the care of Miss Dawson, was soon purchased by Dr. Prime, and his daughters. Miss Maria M. Prime and Miss Cornelia Prime, conducted the school with great success. The academy flourished and attracted students from distant parts of the country. The Presbyterian congregation of the village invited Dr. Prime to take charge of the pulpit, and he preached in it as stated supply about three years. He identified liimself with the improvement of the place, taking an active part in all public movements of a philanthropic and moral character. In addition to the sons and daughters already named, two sons more were trained in the academy, Edward D. G. Prime and William C. Prime, the first-named graduat- ing at Union Colhge and the other at Princeton. The oldest son, A. J. Prime, pursued the study of medicine with Dr. A. K. Hoffinan, and was for many years a successful physician at White Plains, where he died April 3, 1864, aged fifty-three years. During the time of Dr. Prime's principaiship of the academy, and almost entirely through his persever- ance and enterprise, the large and handsome stone building now occupied by the institution was built, and it stands as a monument to his memory. In the year 183o Dr. Prime and bis family removed to Newburgh, N. Y., where they conducted a female seminary and also the Newburgh Academy. His sou, Rev. Samuel Irenieus Prime, D.D., who died in 1885, was for many years the editor of the New York Observer, and known throughout the country as a graceful writer of travels and religious works, as well as for his able editorial management of the Observer. He was born at Ballston_ N. Y., November 4, 1812, graduated at Williams College in 1829, was ordained a Presbyterian minister and re- ceived the degree of D.D. from Hampden-Sidney College, Virginia. His brother, E. D. Prime, also of the Observer, and W. C. Prime, formerly of the New York Journal of Commerce, were also residents of Sing Sing in early life. John Swinburne, A.M., the distinguished scholar and teacher, was born in Brooklyn, N. Y., August 11, 1803. His father was a native of England, and came to this country when a young man. His mother was a native of Ireland, and was brought to the United States by her parents in early childhood. After their marriage his parents settled in Brooklyn, where they had three children, — two sons and one daughter. John was the eldest of the three. When twelve years of age he lost his father by death. His educa- tion, from its earliest stages until he entered on the duties of active life, was directed by an English gen- tleman of rare attainments as a scholar and eminent skill as a teacher, and the successful results of his training were finely illustrated in the subsequent career of his gifted pupil. After leaving school he turned his attention far a short time to mercantile pursuits, and was engaged as book-keeper by a large commercial house in North Carolina. Not finding this sphere of effort congenial to his taste, he returned, after a year and a half, to Brooklyn, where he estab- lished, and successfully conducted for ten years, a select school. On October 5, 1825, he was married to Mary W., daughter of Isaac Searles, of Brooklyn. A few years afterward he accepted an invitation to the position of principal of White Plains Academy, an incorporated literary institution under the care of the regents of the State. This position he filled with the highest credit to his ability as an educator of youth. While principal of this academy he received, as an entirely voluntary tribute to his learning and skill, the honorary degree of Master of Arts from the Wes- leyan University at Middletown, Conn. The president, Rev. Wilbur Fiske, D D., LL.D., in presenting this degree, said, in his letter to Professor Swinburne : "This honor is regarded by our Faculty and Board of Trustees as justly due to your superior scholarship, as proved by the fact that your scholars, who enter our Institution, are the best fitted of any we receive." In 1841, Professor Swinburne, who desired a school which should be subject to his sole authority, and in which he might carry out practically and fully his views of the proper education of boys, established "The White Plains Institute," a boarding-school for boys. The reputation of it-* proprietor and principal, as an accomplished instructor and as a Christian gen- tleman of the highest qualities, was so extensively known and fully established, that from its opening apjdicants for admission to the institute were more numerous than could be received. He now found himself in just the sphere of educational effort which he had long wished. His school was his own, was ad- mirably located, liberally furnished in every depart- 606 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. ment, and would rise or fall as his long-cherished ideal of such a school should find practical realiza- tion from his efforts. To say that his success was pre-eminent is only to state a fact testified to by all who know the history of the school. The prominent characteristic of its instruction throughout was thoroughness. Mastery of the study pursued, at every step of progress made, was the end aimed at and re- quired ; and in this feature it strikingly resembled the celebrated Rugby School of Dr. Arnold in England. His scholars who left the school to enter upon a col- legiate course uniformly took a high rank, and often the highest rank, in scholarship in the institutions they joined; and those who pursued a course prepara- tory to a business life have almost iiivariabh' been found among the most successful and honored in the circles of mercantile and commercial enterprise. The advanced years of the professor are often glad- dened now by visits from his former pupils, — gener- ally gray-headed men and distinguished in their sev- eral spheres of life, who approach their venerable teacher and friend with strong and often touching expressions of respect, gratitude and aifection. The lapse of years and the changes of more than a gen- eration seem only to have strengthened and made more tender the ties which were created by the rela- tion that once existed. From his early youth the professor evinced a remarkable genius for mathemat- ics. While yet a young man he was a contributor to some of the ablest mathematical periodicals of the country. Even now, when more than eighty years of age, he is often found engaged in mathematical in- vestigations, as a mere pastime. This natural capac- ity ibr and pleasure in this science, connected with a peculiar facility in simplifying to young minds its rules and processes, enabled the professor to awa- ken in his school that fondness for mathematical studies, and secure that unusual advancement in them, which was one of the marked results of his teaching. With the literature of ancient Greece and Rome he has rare familiarity. Many of the most elegant of the classic authors of antiquity in their original languages are to him as hand-books, and his transla- tions of a number of them into our vernacular tongue are among the permanent and most valuable fruits of his scholarly labors. He is now just finishing a trans- lation of the works of Horace, which, in fidelity to the original text, and in perspicuity and elegance of expression, will, in the opinion of classical scholars who have had the privilege of examining his work, be superior to any we now have. It is earnestly de- sired that he will give these translations to the world through the press, and that his health and strength will be continued, that he may personally superintend their publication. Among the sciences to which he has succes^sfully given his attention is mineralogy, and through more than half a century he has been engaged in collecting specimens from different parts of the world, till he has now a choice and valuable cabinet. In 1853 Professor Swinburne met with an irrep- arable loss in the death of his wife. This most estimable lady, naturally active and energetic, pos- sessed of superior practical wisdom and endowed with great tenderness of affection, had rendered invaluable aid in the administration of a school whose government was peculiarly parental. Even after the lapse of more than thirty years, the testimony borne to her watchful care and mater- nal kindness, by those once pupils of the school, is a most touching tribute to her memory, and furnishes pathetic proof of the great loss sus- tained by the school in her decease. The uninter- rupted prosperity of the institute had secured to its proprietor a handsome competency ; and having no longer the important aid of his wife, he decided to retire from the school to whose interests he had given the best years of his life. In the sphere of a teacher of youth for thirty years. Professor Swinburne had earned and received its highest honors, and he could now lay aside its labors in the gratifying conscious- ness that to the advancement of the cause of educa- tion, second in importance to none that can employ the human mind, he had given his best powers and most devoted efforts. Since his retirement from teaching, he has contin- ued his residence in White Plains, and has often been honored by his fellow-citizens with positions of responsibility and trust. On the organization of the fire department of the town, he was made its first president, and continued such for a number of years. When the village was incorporated, he was elected its first president, and re-elected for several successive terms. He was made the first president of the White Plains Savings Bank, and president and treasurer of the Board of Commissioners of Westchester Avenue. At the opening of the AVar of the Rebellion, and through its whole progress, his influence was power- fully felt in support ot the cause of the Union. In his eloquent appeals at public gatherings to the pa- triotism of those who could take the field, as well as by his liberal contributions of money to aid in the raising and equipment of military organizations and to meet the wants of the families of soldiers who were absent at the seat of war, he rendered most val- uable aid and inspired hearts in many an anxious home with gladness and hope. Professor Swinburne is a firm believer in the Christian faith. For more than forty years he has been in communion with the Protestant Episcopal Church and a liberal supporter of its worship at home and of its benevolent efforts through the land. Although eighty-three years of age and laboring under the physical infirmities incident to his years, his mental faculties continue unim- paired, and he enjoys his literary labors as highly, and enters into the current affairs of the day as ear- nestly and welcomes the society of his friends as cor- LITERATURE AND LITERARY MEN. 607 dially, as when in the prime of life. The ciirle of his friends is ahnost unlimited, and rarely has a man lived who could boast of those more devoted. Robert Havell, an eminent English engraver and publisher, resided for many years in Sing Sing. Mr. Havell distinguished himself as the publisher, as well as the chief engraver, of that world-renowned and su- premely sumptuous work, Audubon's " Birds of Amer- ica." This work appeared in ten magnificent vol- umes, so large as to occasion the invention of the term elephant folio. They contained over five hundred plates, colored to the life, each bird being shown in life size, even to the extent of a large specimen of the wild turkey. The subscription price was one thousand dollars per copy. Mr. Havell spent fourteen long years in engraving, with his own hands, the most difficult portions of this work. He also employed a full force of assistants. Besides this work, Mr. Havell als ) published the grand work of Lord Kingsborough on the"Auti(iuitiesof Mexico,"in nine quarto volumes, richly illustrated. The subscription price of this work was one hundred and seventy-five pounds per copy. To the above must be added Donnovan's '• In- sects of India " and " Insects of China," two exceed- ingly beautiful illustrated works in quarto, and a su- perb folio on "Lilies and Amaryllas.' After the completion of" The Birds of America," Audubon in- duced Mr. Havell to accompany him to this country. He came to Sing Sing, one day, to enjoy the scenery, and while there made a bid on a parcel of laud then being sold at auction, and had it struck off to him. This surprised him, as he had made his bid more in jest than in earnest. However, he accepted ihe bar- gain, and subsequently built a house on the' grounds and occupied it as his residence for many years. He eventually removed to Tarrytown, where he died a few years since. The Havell mansion was situated on the high grounds nearly opposite the grand gate- way of Dale Cemetery. The little avenue leading to these places still bears his name. That distinguished English writer on mental disor- ders, the late Dr. Forbes Winslow, resided in Sing Sing for several years during his boyhood. His moth- er, who was then a widow, and her two sons, Forbes and Octavius, both of whom subsequently became celebrated, one as a physician, the other as a divine, resided for several years in a house that then stood where the present mansion of Mr. Frank Larkin now s.ands. Rev. Robert Bolton, author of Bolton's "History of Westchester County," was born in the city of Bath, England, April 17, 1814. He was the eldest of the fourteen children of the Rev. Robert Bolton and Anne, daughter of the distinguished Rev. William Jay, of Bath. The Bolton family is of ancient British stock, their genealogy being traced up to the time of the Con- quest ; resident, anciently, at Bolton and Blackburn, in Lancashire, and Wales, in Yorkshire. In the long line of the Bolton ancestry the name of Robert is rarely without a bearer. A number of these were distinguished for their learning and i)iety. A Rob- ert, born in 1572, was noted at Lincoln and Brazen Nose Colleges, Oxford, for his varied accomplish- ments, and afterward as a divine. A Robert, born iu England in 1688, became a prominent mer- chant in Philadelphia. His son Robert, born in 1722, was a merchant in Savannah, Georgia. His son Robert, born in 1757, became a very prominent merchant of Savannah, and the owner of muih valuable real estate- His son Robert, born in 17S8, in Savannah, became a merchant in Liverpool, Eng- land, afterward the rector of Christ Church, P( I- ham, Westchester County, and subsequently chaj)- lain to the Earl of Ducie, at Tortworth, in Glou- cestershire. His son Robert is the subject of this sketch. Mr. Bolton and his four brothers became clergy- men in the Protestant Episcopal Church. He was ordained a deacon in October, 1868, and a presbyter in June, 1869. He was rector of St. John's Church, South Salem, at the time of his death. His brother, William Jay, at the time of his death, was rector of St. James', Bath, England, and an au- thor of note; John is rector of Trinity Church, West- chester, Pa. ; Cornelius Winter is rector of the Church of the Redeemer, Pelhamville, Westchester County; and James was the incumbent of St. Paul's Chapel, Kilburu, London. All of Mr. Bolton's sisters who survived youth achieved distinction in teaching, in literature or in art. Robert Bolton was educated in England, and stud- ied medicine there, but never practiced it as a pro- fession. He came to this country in 1836, and set- tled at Bronx ville, in East Chester, becoming a farmer. From there he removed to New Rochelie and published his first book, "The Guide to New Rochelie." He then removed to Tarrytown and en- gaged in teaching, an occupation to which he gave attention for the remainder of his life. He there be- came principal of the Irving Institute, and enjoyed intimate relations with Washington Irving, who had long been a close friend of his father. He next re- moved to Bedford, taking charge of the Female In- stitute there, and afterward founded a school in Lew- isboro. While preparing the " Guide to New Rochelie " he became interested in Westchester County history, and at once began the collection of the materials which he published in two volumes in 1848. The labor involved in this work, in the searching of collections 1 of documents, the examination of papers and the personal visitation of every spot of interest and nearly every person of advanced age, was very great. His knowledge of the history of county localities was remarkable. He was actively engaged in the revi- I sion of his history at the time of his death. He was also the author of the " History of the Protestant 608 HISTORY OP WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Episcopal Church in Westchester County," and of the " Memoirs of the Bolton Family." In 1838 he married Elizabeth Rebecca, daughter of James Brenton, of Newport, R. I.; she died in 1852. In 1854 he married Josephine, daughter of Brewster Woodhuli, of Patchogue, L. I., by whom he had eleven children. Mr. Bolton's father founded the celebrated Bolton Priory, at Pelham, with which the family name has been so prominently connected. He purchased this estate, charmingly situated upon the shore of Long Island Sound, in 1837, and erected thereon a hand- some stone edifice f )r a residence, and laid out the grounds with surpassing taste. This was afterward used for a young ladies' school, and under the man- agement of Miss Nanetta Bolton, became justly famous. Here Robert Bolton, the historian, died October 11, 1877. Beside being a laborious, painstaking historian, a diligent teacher and an earnest minister, Mr. Bolton was accomplished in many ways. He was dexter- ous in wood-carving, apt with his pencil and skill- ful in painting. He had a passion for the antique, and was a man of peculiarly fine and cultivated tastes. Rev. Cornelius Winter Bolton, brother of Robert Bolion, the historian, was born in Bath, England, June 3, 1819. He came to this country and studied divinity at the Protestant Episcopal Theological Seminary at Alexandria, Va. ; was admitted to dea- con's orders in 1847, and was ordained priest in 1848. In 1850 he became assistant minister of Christ Church, Baltimore, and in 1855 rector of Christ Church, Pelham. In 1858 he was rector of South Youkers Church, and he then became minister of St. George's Chapel, in New York City. He became rector of St. Mark's Church, New Castle, in 1867, and then of St. Stephen's, North Castle,and at pres- ent is rector of the Church of the Redeemer, Pel- hamville. In 1856 he married Cornelia, daughter of Cor- nelius Glen Van Rensselaer, Esq., of Greenbush, Rensselaer County, N. Y. Mr. C. W. Bolton is the author of" The Shepherd's Call," the "Sunday-school Prayer-Book" and other publications. In 1854 he edited Jay's "Female Scripture Characters" and Jay's "Autobiography and Reminiscences." In 1881 he edited and pub- lished his brother Robert's " History of Westchester County." Edmund March Blunl, the nautical writer, was for many years a resident of Sing Sing. He was born at Portsmouth, N. H., June 20, 1770, and died at Slug Sing, January 5, 1862, in the ninety-third year of his age. He was the publisher of the Ntwbiiryport Herald, and in 1796 he published his first "Coast Pilot," which is still in use, and which has been translated into most of the languages of Europe. He also published "Strangers' Guide to New York City" in 1817, and numerous nautical books and charts. He lived about forty years in the house in State Street, Sing Sing, now owned and occupied by Dr. Wm. H. Helm. Mrs. Ann Eliza Bleecker, the poetess, was at one time a resident of Westchester County, having lived at Poughkeepsie a year or two just after her marriage. Mrs. Bleecker was the youngest daughter of Brandt Schuyler, and was born in the city of New York in October, 1752. In 1769 she married Mr. John J. Bleecker, of New Rochelle, and removed with him to Poughkeepsie. After leaving Poughkeepsie, Mr. and Mrs. Bleecker settled at Tomhanick, a beautiful little village about eighteen miles above Albany. She died there November 23, 1783. Her poems were written without a view to publication, but several of them were printed in the earlier numbers of the New York Magazine. A collection of her poems and stories was published in 1793, under the supervision of her daughter, Margaretta, who added a number of verses and essays from her own pen. Gulian C. Verplanck belongs to the literary char- acters of Westchester County by right of residence, for many years dividing his time between the city of New York and the Verplanck homestead at Fishkill Landing, on the Hudson, a well-preserved old man- sion, in which the Society of the Cincinnati was founded. A graduate of Columbia College, he studied law, was admitted to the bar and after spending several years in Europe returned to New York, and was elected a member of the Legislature. In 1818 he delivered the first of the series of public addresses on which his literary reputation mainly rests. About 1820 he was appointed professor of the Evidences of Christianity in the General Protestant Episcopal Seminary, and in 1824 published a volume of essays on this subject. In 1825 he was elected a member of Congress from New York City and remained in the House eight years. He was especially prominent in advocacy of the bill extending the term of copyright from twenty-eight to forty-two years. For several years he was a member of the New York Senate. In 1827 Verplanck, Sands and Bryant united in the production of an annual called 7'he Talisman. Mr. Verplanck also wrote a number of essays on a variety of subjects and published an edition of Shakespeare's plays, with notes from various sources, including some from his own pen. Mr. Verplanck, who was born in New York City August 6, 1786, died there March 18, 1870. His private life, says Bryant, " was as beautiful as his public life was useful and benefi- cent." James Fenimore Cooper is another distinguished name which may be included among the literati or Westchester County, for his first novel was written while he resided at Mamaroneck. Cooper was born at Burlington, N. J., September 15, 1789. His father, Judge William Cooper, removed the following year to the neighborhood of Otsego Lake, N. Y., where he had purchased a large tract of land on which he LITERATURE AND LITERARY MEN. 609 established a settlement, to which he gave the name oC Cooperstown. In this (Vonlicr home, in the midst of a population of settlers, tra])i)ers and Indians, youiif^ Cooper imbibed that knowledge of backwoods lil'c and of the habits of the aborigines which afterwards served him so well in the construction of his romances. At the age of thirteen he entered Yale College, and after remaining there three years received an ap- of the bishop of Western New York. They settled in the village of Mamaroneck, in Westchester County, and not long after Cooper's mind was accidentally turned to the field of fiction. One day, after reading an English novel, he remarked to his wife that he be- lieved he could write a better story himself. To test the matter he wrote " Precaution." He had not intended to publish the novel, but was induced to do so by his ])()intment as midshipman in the United States Navy. In the latter he obtained, during the si.x years of his service, a familiarity with nautical life which he utilized with splendid results in his famous sea-stories. Ill 1811 Cooper resigned his commission in the navy and married Miss De Lancey, a member of the well-known New York family of that name and sister £7 wife and his friend, Charles Wilkes. The descrip- tions of English life and scenery gave it great popu- larity in England where it was re-published. The "Spy," which followed, was as thoroughly American, and obtained great success, not only iu this country, but abroad. It was almost immediately re-])ublished in all parts of l']urope. " The Pioneers" was the first of the series of frontier and Indian stories, on which 610 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the novelist's reputation chiefly rests. It was fol- lowed by " The Pilot," the first of his sea-stories. Other novels followed in quick succession, and Cooper's reputation grew apace. He was also sharply criticised and became involved in various contro- versies, which culminated finally in a series of libel suits against his detractors in the newspapers. In 1826 he visited Europe, and upon his return to this country made his home at Cooperstown, N. Y. Dur- ing his residence abroad (1826-33) he was every- where received with marked attention. His literary activity was unchecked by his wanderings, and during his .stay in Europe he wrote a number of novels. After his return to this country he wrote the " Naval History of the United States," which excited an acrimonious di.scussion as to the correctness of his account of the battle of Lake Erie. In one of his libel suits Cooper defended, in person, the accuracy of his version of the battle. A lawyer, who was an auditor of the closing sentences of his argument, re- marked, " I have heard nothing like it since the days of Emmet." Cooper continued to write with amaz- ing fertility and vigor almost to the close of his life, which was terminated by dropsy, September 14, 1851. Notwithstanding his defects of style, his romances are conceded to be among the most vivid and original of j all American works of fiction. He was the first of his countrymen who obtained a wide recognition in other portions of the world. His works were tran.s- lated into many languages, and the Indian tales | esjjecially were universal favorites in Europe. The great French novelist, Balzac, said of him, " With, what amazing power has he painted nature! How all his pages glow with creative fijel Who is there writing English among our contemporaries, if not of him, of whom it can be said that he has a genius of the first order?" "The emj)ire of the sea," says the Edinburf/h Review, " has been con- ceded to him by acclamation ; " and the samejournal adds, " In the lonely desert or untrodden prairie, among the savage Indians, or scarcely less savage settlers, all equally acknowledge his dominion." Of all the writers who have in any way been associated with tlie history of Westchester County, Washington Irving is perhai)s the most illustrious. Born in New York City, his whole life, with brief in- tervals, was spent within the borders of the county, and some of his very best work bears the impress of ' local influences. On the " lordly Hudson " Irving I " chose and built the home where he lived for many years, and in which he did much of his life's best work, and here he died." " Westchester," said another eulogist of Irving, " has a claim peculiarly her own, for, while we are joint- heirs with others of his fame, Irving was here honored during his life for other qualities besides 1 Address of Chief .Tustice Noah Davis at the Irving anniversary, at Tanytown, N. Y., April :), 1883. i those of the gifted author, as he was here also known as the good citizen, the genial neighbor and the Christian gentleman." , Irving first came to know Tarrytown and Sleepy I Hollow when a lad of fourteen or fifteen. He ( spent some of his holidays here, and formed an f attachment for the spot which never left him. Irving was born on the 8d of April, 1783, in a house which stood on William Street, New York City, next to the i corner of Fulton. He was the youngest son of I William Irving, a merchant and native of Scotland, who had married an English lady. He had an ordi- nary school education, but early developed a taste for literature. At the age of sixteen he began the study of law. His brother, Dr. Peter Irving, edited the Morning Chronicle, and for this paper Washington Irving wrote a series of essays on the theatres, man- ners of the town and kindred topics, with the sig- nature of Jonathan Oldstyle. In 1804 for the benefit of his health he visited the south of Europe, returning by way of Switzerland to France and proceeding thence after a sojourn of a few months in Paris to England via Flanders and Holland. While at Rome he formed the acquaintance of Washington Allston, the artist, with whom he studied painting for a time with the idea of himself becoming a painter. After an absence of two years, however, he returned to New York, in March, 1806, and again took up the study of law. He was admitted to the bar, but never practiced. About this time he wrote and published his portion of the " Salmagundi " papers, which ap- peared as a serial. Paulding wrote a portion of the work, William Irving the poetry and Washington Irving the remainder. In December, 1809, he pub- lished " Knickerbocker's History of New York," an extravagant burlesque, which excited general laugh- ter, although it was gravely held up to reprehen- sion in an address before the Historical Society of New York. It^ grotesque descriptions of Dutch manners and customs in the colony of New Nether- lands are full of humor. After the publication of this work Irving engaged as silent partner with two of his brothers in mercantile business. The second war with Orcat Britain breaking out, he joined the military staM' of Governor Tompkins, with the rank of colonel. After the war he paid a visit to the British Islands, and inteiuled to make a tour of the Continent, but business reverses involving the ruin of his firm compelled him to abandon his purpose. Irving now turned to literature for support, and through the friendly aid of Sir Walter Scott, secured the publication of the " Sketch Book " by Murray, the great English publisher, who bought the co|)y- right for two hundred pounds, which he subsequently increased to four hundred pounds. In 1820 Irving took up his residence in Paris, where he formed the acquaintance of Tom Moore. While in - Address of James Wood, Tarrytown celebration, 1883. LITERATURE AND LITERARY MEN. (Ill Paris he wrote " Bracebridge Hall." The winter of 1822 wiis spent in Dresden. Returning to Paris in 1S23 he published, in December of the following year, his " Talcs of a Traveller,'' for which he received from ilurray the sum of £1500. In 1826, after spending a winter in the south of France, he went to Madrid, where he wrote his "Life of Columbus," the English edition of which brought him 3000 guineas. His "Conquest of Granada" and " Alhambra" followed. In July, 182!t, having been appointed Secretary of Legation, at London, he left Spain for England. In 1S;-!1 he received, from the University of Oxford the degree of LL.D. After an absence of seventeen yeai*s he returned to America, in May, 1832. His arrival was commemorated by a public dinner in New York City, at which Chancellor Kent presided. A few months later he made a journey west of the Missis- sippi, which he described in his " Tour of the Prai- ries." In 183(3 he published "Astoria "and subse- quently the "Adventures of Captain Bonnevill." From 1839 for two years he contributed a series of papers to the Kiiickcrbocher MiKjaziiie. A number of these papers, together with others, were published in 1855, in a volume which received the title " Woolfert's Roost." In 1842 Irving was appointed Minister to Spain, an oflice which he retained for the next four years. He then returned home and for the rest of his life resided at his cottage residence "Sunnyside," near Tarry- town, the spot wliich he had described years before in the " Legend of Sleepy Hollow " as the castle of the Herr Van Tassel, and of which he wrote — " If ever I should wish for a retreat whither I might steal from the world and its distractions, and dream quietly away the remainder of a troubled life, I know of none' more promising than this little valley." Here in this re- treat he lived in the midst of a family circle composed of his brother and his nieces, hospitably entertaining his friends and engaged in writing his biographies of Goldsmith and Mahomet and his " Life of Washing- ton." His life at "Sunnyside" was simple, kindly and affectionate. He was a good friend and neighbor and a devout communicant at Christ Episcopal Church in Tarrytown. For many years he was a vestryman and warden, and it was his i)ractice during the greater part of this time to take up the collection at the Sun- day services. He never married, having lost by death his betrothed wife, Matilda Hoffman, a beautiful young girl. His death occurred at Tarrytown, No- vember 28, 1859, and he was buried in the beautiful cemetery of Sleepy Hollow. The ivy upon the tower of Christ Church wiis taken from "Sunnyside" and planted by Irving himself. It was originally brought from ^lelrose Abbey, His pew in the church is marked with his name and Wiis set apart years ago by the vestry for the use of any members of the Irving family who might wish to worship there. As near the pew as it could be placed is a mural tablet erected by the vestry to his memory. In the centre is the Irving coat of arms and on the stone the fol- lowing inscription : Wasliington Irving, Born in the City of New York, April 3, 1783. Fur ninny years n cuninuiuicant ami warden of thid dinrch, And Reix>atcraham Dawson, was born in July, 1795, at Wisbeach, in the neighboring county of Cambridge, where his grand- father, originally of LincoliLshire, was then residing. His father'.>5 mother, a Miss Culy, belonged to a family of French Huguenots, who lived on a farm called Guyhirn, near Wisbeach. His mother was Mary Barton, second daughter of John Barton, of the parish of Bicker, five miles north of Gosberton. Mr. Barton was a respectable farmer. His daughter, Mary, mar- ried Abraham Dawson, May 15, 1820. Henry Barton Dawson was their only son and the eldest of six children. He received his first instruc- tion from a school-mistress, who found him an apt and ready pupil. At nine years of age, having in the meantime had the care of the village school-master, he attended, for a year, the noted school of Mr. Moses of Donnington. The last school in his native county, at which he was taught, was kept by Mr. Greenfield, a pupil of Mr. Moses, who carried him through a course of practical surveying. In the spring of 1834 his parents, with their fiimily, removed from England to the United States. They landed at New York on the 9th of June in the same year. His father's chief reason for emigrating was his dissatisfaction with the British government. AtMan- hattanville, eight miles from New York, he established himself as a gardener, an occupation which he con- tinued to pursue until a short time before his death, in January, 1872. Henry attended the public schools in West Seventeenth Street, New York, and at Man- hattanville until the spring of 1836, exce])t during the summer of 1835, when he was at work with his father. In March, 183C, he left school in order to assist his father, who was then gardener at the Bloomingdale Lunatic Asylum. Before he left the trustees of the Public Sciiool Society tendered him a free scholar- ship in college, but the limited means of his father would not admit of his acceptance. He continued to work in the garden of the asylum with his father until the fall of 1837, when the family removed to Ithaca, N. Y., with the intention of settling on a farm. His father, however, resumed his occupation of gardener, and Henry continued to assist him for a short time. He then became an apprentice to a wheel-wright, Mr. Ira Bower, and soon after a clerk in the book-selling and publishing house of Messrs. Mack, Andrus & Woodruff, at Ithaca. In the winter of 1838-39 he left the latter to take the position of confidential clerk for Judge Gere, a wealthy resident of the town, and in April, 1839, returned to New York, where his em- ployer had established a large lumber-yard. His salary at this time was one hundred and twenty-five dollars a year. Mr. Dawson continued in this business, under successive employers, until May, 1844, when he was engaged by Messrs. Comstock & Co., of Cortlandt Street, large dealers in patent medicines, as book- keeper. He also i)erformed the duties of their cashier and corresponding clerk. In June, 184r), he became book-keejier for Messrs. Gumming, Main & Co., drug- gists, with whom he remained one year. Although Mr. Dawson had contributed articles for the daily press, generally on ])olitical topics, as early as the winter of 1840, his first pecuniary venture in literature was brought about in a rather singular way. Having, in 1845, while still employed by Comstock & Co., advanced some money to the proprietor of The Cnj»tnl Fount, a weekly temperance and literary new.s- paper, he was obliged to take the printing-office and paper in repayment of his loan. For more than a year he edited and published the paper besides dis- charging his duties as book-keeper, and finding the work too burdensome, he finally, in 184G, gave up his position with Gumming, Main & Co., and devoted all his time to the newspaper. In November of the same year he was obliged to discontinue its publica- tion with the loss, not only of the original loan, but LITERATURE AND LITERARY MEN. 013 also of all his savings. The paper was the organ of tlie Order of tho Reclial)ites, and Mr. Dawson's uncom- promising spirit having involvt'd him in diliicuUios with the principal officers of the order, the paper suffered from the enmities thus aroused. Mr. Dawson next accepted the agency of the Inter- national Art Union, and in the following year, tliat of the American Art Union, wliicli hitter lie retained until the concern was closed hy the Sujireme Court. After this he was an ofiicer of the Wall Street Ferry to Brooklyn, and was successively connected with three different insurance companies in New York. In larty. During the Presidential canvass of that year, he was a member of the New York City committee of that party, and in 1849 was on the "general committee" of the city — what was known as "the old men's committee" — of which S. J. Tilden, B. F. Butler, ex-Attorney-General of the United States, Wilson G. Hunt, (Jeorgc H. Purser, Jlark S{)encer, Anthony J. Bleecker, John Van Buren, David Dudley Field, Lucius Robinson, Nelson J. Waterbury and other well-known politicians were members. He ad- hered to the Free Soil [)arty and its successor, the Republican party, till the War of Secession, to the last-named, however, not as a " Republican," but as "a Democrat opposed to the administration." Since the close of the War he has been, as he maintains he had been before the War, a Democrat and a rigid opponent of centralized power both in State and Federal government. Mr. Dawson was married May 28, 184'), to Cathe- rine, daughter of Abraham D.and Esther (Whelpley) Martling, of Tarrytown, Westchester County, N. Y., one of the oldest families of the county. They have had nine children — 1, Spencer H. C, born May 11, 1846, died July 1), 1871; 2, Henry B., Jr., born De- cember 1<», 1847, died March 10, 1876; 3, William ^lartling, born August '11, 184!l ; 4, Stephen Van Rensselaer, born September 21, 1851 ; 5, George Cooley, born September 25, 1853, married Mary Kate Dean November 16, 1881 ; 6, Mary Dawson, born June 17, 1855, married William H. Halsey July 6, 1875; 7, 616 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Catheriue Martling, born April 9, 1859; 8, Esther Martling, boru July 17, 1861, died March 16, 18G5; and 9, Caroline Dutcher, born August 31, 1803, died April 22, 1880. They have also had an adopted daughter, Anna Augusta, born October 30, 1851, who died May 31, 1878. James Kirke Paulding, the friend of Irving and his associate in the production of the Sabiiayimdi papers, was of Westchester extraction, though a native of Dutchess County. His grandfather, many years previous to the Revolution, settled in Westchester County on a farm at Tarrytown, still in possession of his descendants. The family removed to a tract of land in Dutchess County which had been granted them by King William III. This change was made in consequence of the fact that the Paulding resi- dence being " within the lines," that is in the dis- trict intervening between the British Army at New York and the American forces in the Highlands, and the Pauldings being Whigs they were exposed to the de|)redations of the British troops and their Tory allies. Paulding was born at a place called Pleasant Valley in Dutchess County, August 22, 1779. His father was a leader of the Whig party in the county of Westchester, a member of the first committee of safety and subsequently Commissary General of the New York quota of troops. He was financially ruined by furnishing the army with supplies obtained on his personal credit for which he could obtain no compensation from the government. After the close of the war, the family returned to their former home in Westchester, and Paulding was educated at the village school — a log house nearly two miles distant from his residence. Here he receiv- ed all the education he ever obtained from tuition. On arriving at manhood in 180U he removed to New York City, staying at first with Washington Irving's brother, William, who had married Paulding's sister. His first attempts in literature were his contributions to the SalinaIaf;., Feby., 1ST2. 58 Culi>rit Fay," was made, and published in 1S36, by j his only child, the wife of Commodore McKay. Edgar Allan Poe, wrote some of his most noted pro- ductions while a resident of Westchester County, including the famous "Raven". Although he was very poor during most of the time, this was probably the brightest period of his melancholy life ; for he was happier in the companionship of his wife, the lovely Virginia Clemm, and her mother, than at any other stage of his chequered career. His wife's death, after a residence in the county of about three years, was a sad blow to the poet's sensitive organization ; but it is plciiisant to think that the sweetest as well as the saddest memories of his "dear heart" his "dear Virginia," were associated with the charming land- scapes of Morrisania and Fordham. Poe was nearly thirty-four years old when, in the autumn of 1844, he removed to New York City from Philadelphia. Born in Boston, in January LSll, his early life was as chequered and eventful as his manhood was dark and stormy. The Poe family was one of the oldest and most respectable in Maryland. Edgar's grand- father was a quartermaster-general in the Continen- tal Army and the friend of Lafayette. His father while a law student fell in love with a beautiful actress, Elizabeth Arnold, and went on the stage. He was discarded by his family, and he and his wife died within a few weeks of each other in Richmond, Va., leaving three children, Henry, Edgar and Rosalie, in a state of destitution. Edgar was adopted by Mr. I John Allan, a wealthy merchant of Richmond, from whom he derived his middle name. Mr. and Mrs. Allan treated him with great kindness, and after a tour of the British Islands in 1816, placed him at school at Stoke Newington near London, where he remained four or five years. In 1822 he returned to Richmond, and in 1825 was entered as a student at the University of Virginia. His life at the University was marked by many youthful excesses, which finally resulted in his expulsion. He was very much in debt and upon Mr. Allan's refusal to satisfy the claims of some of his creditors he quarreled with his benefactor and set out to join the Greeks, who were then in the midst of their war with Turkey. After wandering in Europe for about a year, he finally made his way to St. Petersburg where he became involved in a quarrel ' with the Russian authorities, from which he was extri- cated through the kind offices of the American minister, Mr. Middleton. Returning to America he was again taken into favor by Mr. Allan, who sent him to West Point, where his conduct was so irregular that in ten months after his admission he was cash- iered. He was again received into Mr. Allan's family but another rupture ensued, in consequence, it is said, of Poe's uncivil behavior toward Mr. Allan's .«econd wife. Mr. Allan died a few years latter, leaving Poe j nothing. Thrown upon his own resources, Poe turned to ' literature for support. In 1829, he had published in \ 618 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Baltimore a volumeof poems, " Al Aaraaf, Tamerlane and Minor Poems," which iiad been received withfiivor. He seems to have had but little difficulty in obtaining employme'itfrom magazines and newspapers, but the pay was meagre. In despair he enlisted in the army and then deserted. Luckily for him, in 1833 he entered the competition for prizes offered by the Baltimore Saturday Visitor for a story and a poem. He was awarded both prizes but was subsequently excluded from the second prize and only given that for the story. His story was the " MSS. found in a Bottle" and his poem " The Coliseum." His produc- tions attracted the notice of John P. Kennedy, the novelist, who befriended him and finally secured him employment on the Southern Literary Messenger. This may be said to have been the beginning of Poe's literary career. In 1835, he was made editor of have sheltered Washington and some of his generals in the days of the Revolution. The front window's command the Boulevard (formerly Bloomingdale Road) and the new Riverside Park. The Hudson is seen through the trees, with the lofty Palisades be- yond, a view still meet for the poet, and far more i picturesque and beautiful when Poe looked upon it. Poe was often seen walking along the banks of the river, and he and his wife no doubt were wont to sit at the western window and watch the decline of the sun as it sank to rest behind the embattled front of the Palisades. The room formerly occupied by Poe and in which " The Raven" was written, is an apart- ment of moderate size, on the second floor of the house. Its windows look out upon the Hudson. The mantel, a relic of by-gone days, is of wood, curiously carved and painted in imitati'^n of ebony. Here, be- THE HOrSE IX WHICH I'OE WROTE THE UAVEX. that publication at a salary of five hundred dollars per annum and removed to Richmond, where he mar- ried his cousin, Virginia Clemni. In January, 1837, he left Richmond and returned to Baltimore, whence he proceeded to Philadelphia and New York. In Philadelphia he obtained employ- ment as a contributor to the Gentleman's Magazine, and in May, 1839, was made its editor. In the fol- lowing year he took charge of Graham's Magazine. In the spring of 1843, he wrote "The Gold Bug," for which he received a prize of one hundred dollars. He had previously written a number of critical pa- pers and stories, among them "The Mystery of Marie Roget." In the autumn of ]S44 he removed to New York. His residence at first was on what is now Eighty-fourth Street. The house, a large bleak structure, stands on a rocky elevation. It is said to fore the old fashioned fire-place, the poet sat and dreamed his wonderful dreams, the weirdest of which, perhaps, is embodied in " The Raven-" Poe's next place of residence was Fordham. In the winter of 1846, says one of his biographers, he was living in extreme destitution at Fordham. In the meantime he had been employed by Willis & Morris, as critic and assistant editor of The Mirror, a position which he retained about six months, and as associate editor with C. F. Briggs of The Broadv:ay Journal. The latter publication ceased in January, 184G, and Poe then began a series of papers, " The Literati of New Y'ork City," which were published in The Lady's Book. Their pungency and pereonality created for him many enemies. His troubles now be- gan to thicken. His wife's health, which had always been delicate, was failing rapidly and Poe was sub- LITERATI- HE AND IJTHHAKV MEN. 619 hi.s cottage- His jected to the agony ol' seeing her lading, day by day, without the means at hand to minister properly to her comfort. His necessities were finally made known by some friendly hand in the newspapers and a sub- scription was raised in his behalf. But, although his sufterings were extreme, he must have had many gleams of happiness in the little old-fashioned cottage at Fordham. It is a quaint little structure, a story and a half high, with a white shingled gable-end to- ward the street and a porch on one side. It is perched on the top of a hill and is surrounded by old fruit- trees, mossy stone walls and thickets of brambles and flowers. In one of his papers on the Literati, Poe severely criticised Dr. Thoma.s Dunn English, who retorted in a personal article which was reproduced in the Evening Mirror. Poe thereupon sued for libel and recovered from the Mirror several hundred dol- lars, with which he refitted life at this time was one of singular domestic tranquillity and sweetness. His mother-in- law, Mrs. Clemm, who seems to have been much attached to him, watched over him with tender kindness and solicitude, and managed the affairs of the little household with great skill and prudence. Poe's affection for his wife and her mother is the one bright spot in his sombre life. In a tender letter of June 12, 184(5, to his wife he speaks of Mrs. Clemm as " our mother," and declares that liis "dear Virginia " is his "great- est and only stimulus now, to battle with this uncongenial, unsatisfactory and ungrateful life.'" Nearly all the personal reminiscence.* of Poe which tell of his life at Fordham are of a bright and pleasing character. One of his friends describes his wife as looking very young. "She had large, black eyes and a pearly whiteness of complexion which was a perfect pallor. The pale face, her brilliant eyes and her raven hair gave her an unearthly look. One felt that she was al- most a disrobed spirit, and when she coughed it was made certain that she was rapidly passing away." Mi-s. Clemm, we are told, "was a tall, dignified old lady with a most lady-like manner, and her black dress, though old and much worn, looked really ele- gant on her." The same informant says, "the cot- tage had an air of taste and gentility that must have been lent it by the presence of its inmates. So neat, so poor, so unfurnished, and yet so charming a dwel- ling I never saw." A short distance back of the cottage there is a rocky elevation, crowned with cedars. It overlooks a pleasant landscape and the hills of Long Island in the distance. Tradition asserts that this was a favor- ite spot of Poe's, and here, perhaps, he wove in his brain the ideas which found expression in " Eureka," " Annabel Lee," " For Annie" and " Ulalume," all of which were written while he lived at Fordham. .\nother favorite resort was the Aqueduct pathway, leading from High Bridge to Fordham. A recently published description of the cottage and its surroundings says: " Two years ago the place was sold at public auction, under foreclosure, and it was bid in for five thousand seven hundred dollars. The unpaid taxes and accrued interest amounted to some- thing more than that. From the railroad station the road winds up the Fordham hill to the cottage, with the native rock as a pavement. The cottage seems no more than a little paint-box, shingled on the sides as well as the roof, and covered with vines on which KIHiAU AI.LAX I'OE S HO.MK AT FOKDHA.M. the foliage is now appearing. It is only a few feet from the road, but in summer is almost obscured by the trees. Within, the rooms are more spacious than they appear from the road. A cherry-tree planted by Poe, now vigorous and thrifty, shades a pleasant porch. There are two good-sized rooms, a bed-room and a kitchen on the lower floor. In the front room Virginia, Poe's invalid wife, lay through her sickness, and died. On the upper floor there are three rooms, one of them quite large. The old-fashioned chimney passes through it, aftbrding an old-time fire- place, which in winter, when filled with crackling wood, would be a cheerful place. It was a favorite room with the poet, and here he wrote " Ulalume " and " Eureka." "Poe moved to Fordham from Amity Street. Washington Square was then the centre of the fine 620 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. residences of the city, and his huiise in Amity Street, into which he moved when the " Raven ' had brought him a reputation, was only a short distance from tlie square. He had been engaged on the Evening Mir- ror at a salary of ten dollars a week, and in a suit against the paper for libel, after resigning his posi- tion, he secured a verdict and obtained several hun- dred dollars. With this money he secured the Ford- ham cottage, at a rental of one hundred dollars a year, furnished it and removed there with his wife and her mother, Mrs. Clemm, who remained there until Poe's death in 1849. The grounds, comprising about two acres, are as interesting as the house, and have asso- ciations reaching back to Revolutionary times, when this neighborhood was a part of the ' neutral ground ' and the field of Cooper's ' Spy.' The lawn slopes into a grassy hollow. A massive ledge of blue- THE OI-U DUTCH CHURCH, FOKDHAM. gray rock overlooks the valley at the height of a hun • dred feet and forms the eastern wall of the place. The site is said to have been occupied at one time by a British batteiy. Now a tennis club, composed of young men and women of Fordham, meets on the lawn in summer. The rocky ledge commands a view of the Long Island hills in purple background and against the horizon. lu the growth of the city it is likely to become one of the choice sites for resi- dences. " The place rents for four hundred dollars a year. For several years it has been occupied by Mrs. E. D. Dechert, the widow of an engineer who drew many of the plans of Central Park, and afterward most of the avenues and drives of Fordham. A few of those who knew Poe and his family are still living in the neighborhood. One of these was his nearest neigh- bor, Mrs. Reuben Cromwell, then a young girl. She said recently that the first time she saw Poe he was up in a cherry-tree picking the fruit, and his wife stood beneath the tree. ' He was a nice-looking young man,' continued Mrs. Cromwell, ' and soci- able.' His wife had come out here to get the good air, he said, and to dig in the ground and get well. But she was too thin and weak to dig. She soon be- came ill and never came out until she was buried. Her mother they called Muddie, and Mr. Poe they always called Eddie. They were awful poor ; poorer than I ever want to be. " Mrs. Cromwell describes going over to the house the morning that she heard of Poe's death. Mrs. Clemm was packing his things, having received a letter from him the day before, in which he wrote of his intended marriage to a Baltimore lady, and said that he would come on for her. She was overcome when informed of his death, and was sure that he would not have died had she been there to ' nurse him in his bad spell.' The neighbors raised money to enable her to go to Baltimore. Poe had not paid any rent for several months, and Mrs. Clemm afterwards returned and sold their few effects. Among these Mrs. Cromwell obtained the family Bible, a rocking-chair and a clock, which she still retained as relics of her distinguished but unfortunate neighbor." In January, ]847, Poe's wife died and was buried in the church-yard of the old Dutch Church, on the King's Bridge road, about half a mile to the westward of the cottage. She was laid in the vault belonging to the Valen- tine family, who owned the cottage which Poe rented. In 1878 the remains were taken to Baltimore, to be placed beside those of her devoted " Edgar," and the vault itself has now disappeared. After the death of his wife, Poe's sister, Rosalie, came to live with him at Fordham. Poe continued to reside in the cottage until June, 29, 1849, when he started forth on the journey which terminated in his death. Before leaving, he arranged his papers and instructed Mrs. Clemm as to what disposition to make of them in case he died. After spending some time in Richmond he started on his return to New Y'ork, but got no farther than Baltimore when he was lakeu ill, and died in an infirmary on the 7th of October, 1849, at the age of thirty-eight. Rev. Daniel Curry, D.D.,the clergyman and author, was born near Peekskill, November 26, 1809; gradu- ated from the Wesleyan University in 1837, and in the same year became principal of the Troy Con- ference Academy, at West Poultney, Vermont. In 1839 he became a professor in the Georgia Female College at Macon, and in 1841 entered the Georgia Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church. He filled pastoral charges at Athens, Savannah and Columbus, and in 1844 was transferred to the New LITKRATl'RE AND LITERARY MKN. H21 York Conference where he continued to engage in pastoral work until 1854, when he was chosen presi- dent of the Indiana Asbury I'liiversity, at Green- castle, Indiana. After three years he returned to New York and in 1864 was elected editor of the Christian Advocate, at New York. He was re-elected in 18()8 and 1872, and in 187(5 became the editorofthe jAidifs:' Jiejiositort/ of the Methodist Episcopal Church. Dr. Curry has written much for the periodicals of his church in addition to the articles which he gave to his regular editorial work. He has pub- lished a "Life of Wyckliff," "The Metropolitan City of America," and a " Life of Bishop Davis W. Clark," and has edited the writings of the late Rev. Dr. James Floy, and an edition of Soutliey's " Life of Wesley." Rev. Robert Baird, D.D., the author and philan- thropist, spent the closing houi"s of his busy life in Westchester County, dying at Yonkci-s on the 15th of REV. D.\Nir.L CTRRY, D.I). March, 1863. Born in Fayette Co., Pennsylvania, in 1798, he was graduated at Jefferson College in 1818, and received the degree of D.D. in 1842. From 1835 ro 1843 he was the most part of the time in Europe, striving to revive the Protestant faith in the south of the continent, and to i>romote the cause of temperance in the North. He published a number of valuable works. His son. Professor Henry M. Baird, D.D., LL.D., of Yonkers, professor of Greek in the University of New York, is a distinguished scholar and liistorian. He has published a book of travels entitled, " Modern Greece," and more recently a " History of the Rise of tlie Huguenots of France,'" 2 vols. 8vo., which has taken rank among the more important historical works of the day. Another son. Rev. Charles W. Baird, D.D., is the author of two cha])ters of this work, the histories of the the towns of Rye and Harrison, and is a distinguished litcrateur. He was born in Princeton, N. J., August 28, 182S. and was graduated at the Tnivei'sity of the city of New York in 1848 and at the Union Theo- logical Seminary in 1852. He was ordained for the ministry and in 1852-i54 was the American chaplain in Rome, Italy. In 1859-61 he was the minister at the Reformed Dutch Church on Bergen Hill, Brook- lyn, N. Y., and since May 9, 1861, has been pastor of the Presbyterian Church of Rye, N. Y. Dr. Baird has written " Eutaxia : Historical Sketches," New York, 1855 ; " A Book of Public Prayer," New York, 1857; " History of Rye, N. Y.," 1870; "His- tory of Bedford Church," 1882; "History of the Huguenot Immigration to America," 2 vols., 1885. Elias Cornelius, D.D., the educator and missionary, was born at Somers in 1794, graduated at Yale Col- lege in 1818 and died at Hartford, Conn., February 12, 1832. In early life he studied theology and in 1816 visited the Cherokee and Chickasaw Indians as a missionary. In 1818 he went to New Orleans in the employ of the Missionary Society of Connecti- cut. In July, 1819, he was installed with Dr. Wor- cester at Salem, but upon being appointed, in Sep- tember, 1826, secretary of the American Educational Society he was dismissed. He contributed to the Quarterly Journal and published the reports of his educational society. His father was surgeon's mate of Colonel Angell's regiment during the Revolution, and at one time an inmate of the "Jersey" prison-ship. He died at Somers, June 13, 1823, aged sixty-five years. Among the eminent men who, after having made high reputations for themselves in other localities, selected Yonkers as the home of their ad- vanced life, is Professor William Holmes Chambers Bartlett. For more than forty years he was identified with the United States Military Academy at West Point, first as a cadet, and subsequently as Professor of Natural and Experimental Philosophy. The lead- ing particulars of his life, obtained in outline from Cullum's " Register of the Officers and Graduates " of the academy, with such details as we have been able to gather from other sources, are as follows : Professor Bartlett was born in Pennsylvania in I September, 1804, but as his parents removed imme- i diately after his birth to St. Louis, Missouri, his childhood and youth were passed in the latter State, and it was from it that he was in due time sent to West Point. His parents were poor, and as there were then no schools at the West, he had no home advantages for education. Attracting, however, the notice of Missouri men who were able to command ' the influence of Senator Thomas H. Benton, an ap- pointment-was procured for him as a cadet. He was received at West Point on the 1st of July, 1822, at seventeen years and eight months of age, stood at the head of his class through his whole four years of study, and was graduated at its head on the 1st of July, 1826, having served as Acting iVssistant Profes- sor of Matiiematics during the last two years of his ' course. From August 30, 1S2(;. to August 30, 1829, 622 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. he coDtiuued to be employed at the academy, first as Assistant Professor, and later as Principal Assistant Professor of Engineering. In 1828 he took part as assistant engineer in the construction of Fortress Monroe, Va., and from 1829 to 1832 was engaged in the construction of Fort Adams, Newport Harbor; R. I. From 1832 to 1884 he was assistant to the chief engineer at Washington, D. C. In the latter year he returned to the Point, and became Acting Profes- sor of Natural and Experimental Philosophy. To the fiill professorship in this department he finally received an appointment from General Jackson in 1836, and continued to fill the position until 1871, when he resigned and was appointed colonel in the regular army on the retired list. The instru- ment by which he was appointed to his professorship in 1836 is still in his possession. It was forwarded to General Cass, and sent by him, through his son, to Professor Bartlett. It was as follows: " I hereby appoint Second Lieut. 'Williaiu H. C. liartlett, of the Corps of Engineers, Prof, of Nat. and Exper. I'liilosophy (vice Courtney resigned. (Signed,) .\m>re\v Jackson. During the student days of Professor Bartlett, as we have seen, he spent two years in teaching in the acad- emy. Many men, afterwards distinguished in United States history, and several who, on both sides, in our civil contest, became men of mark, were at the institu- tion. Leonidas Polk, a relative of James K. Polk, and afterwards Bishop of Louisiana, was his room-mate, and Albert Sidney Johnston, afterwards killed at the battle of Shiloh, was both his room-mate and class- mate. Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee and Charles Mason (afterwards Judge Mason, of Iowa) were under his instruction, as were many others who in due time became widely noted. While engaged in the construction of Fort Adams, between 1829 and 1832, Professor Bartlett contributed to SiUimnn^s Journal a paper on " The Expansibility of Coping Stones," which has been frequently referred to by foreign writers. During his life in Washington (1832 to 1834), as first assistant to Chief Engineer (Gen- eral) Gratiot, he had a great deal to do with the engi- neering on the Cumberland National road, and with fortifications all over the country. In 1840 he was ordered by President Van Buren, through his Secre- tary of War, Mr. Poinsett, to examine the European observatories, with a view to improving the course of instruction in astronomy, practical and theoretical, in the Military Academy. In this work he was absent from the country about five months, and made many valuable aciiuaintances in Europe. On his return he submitted to the War Department the report of his work, the receipt of which was duly acknowledged. It is a misfortune, however, that this valuable report has in some way been lost. Frequent search has been made for it, but without success. It suggested a plan for an observatory to be located in Washington City. In addition to these labors, the Professor, dui ing his long service at the Point, prepared several text- books for the use of the cadets. In 1839 he pub- lished a " Treatise on Optics ;" in 1858, one on "Synthetical Mechanics," and another on "Spherical Astronomy," and in 1859 one on " Acoustics and Optics " and another on " Analytical Mechanics." Before finally retiring from his professorship he also published an article entitled " Strains on Rifle Guns," which will be found in the Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, Volume I. It was also sep- arately published. All this shows the years of his life at West Point to have been busy and productive. In 1847 Geneva College conferred upon the professor the degree of Doctor of Laws. The degree of Master of Arts had been conferred upon him as an honorary degree by the College of New Jersey, at Princeton, ten years before. He is a member of the Philosoph- ical Societies of Philadelphia and Boston, and is one of the original corporators of the American Academy of Science, incorporated by Congress. His books and his writings in periodicals are a monument to Professor Bartlett's scholarship and industry. The value of his books may be inferred from the fact that they have passed through a succes- sion of editions. The ninth edition of " Analytical Mechanics" was published in 1874. AVe judge from a mere pa.ssing sentence in the preface to the second edition that, in the so-called conflict between scien- tists and the Bible, this eminent scholar and scientist has no sympathy with Anti-Theism. Speaking of a mathematical formula which he framed and which expresses the laws that govern the action and reaction of forces upon bodies, he says of this formula, — " It embraces alike, in their reciprocal action, the "gigantic and distant orbs of the celestial regions " and the proximate atoms of the ethereal atmosphere " which pervades all space, and establishes an un- " broken continuity upon which its divine architect " and author may impress the power of His will at a " single point and be felt everywhere." This, even in an academy text-book, is a strong tribute to Theism, and when it is added as a fact that Professor Bartlett is a worthy member of the Ei)i.sco- pal communion, [it may be safely taken as a tribute to Theism in its Christian phase. In 1871, at sixty-seven years of age, Professor Bartlett was retired at his own request. On the 1st of July he removed from West Point to Yonkers, and took possession of a fine residence which he had purchased for himself on Locust Hill Avenue. Here he has since lived. At the time of his retirement from the Point he was elected actuary of the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, and this posi- tion he still holds, faithfully fulfilling its duties day by day, even at eighty-one years of age. He has ren- dered exceedingly valuable service to the comi>any. Among his labors have been the construction of tables to facilitate their oflSce work, and the prepara LITEKATI RE AND LITEUAHV .MEN. tioii ol' an ehibonite report of thirty-oue years of the working ot'tlieir institution. Professor Barllett was married during his work upon Fort Adams, in Newport Harbor, February 4, 1829, to Miss Harriet Whitehorne, daughter of Sam- uel Whitehorne, a merchant of that phice. He has had eight children, of whom four sons and three daughters are yet living. Jlrs. Bartlett is also still spared. The professor, though somewhat infirm, is still both mentally and physically active, keeps up a deep interest in passing events, and is a fluent and sprightly conversationalist and companion, full of rem- iniscences of the ccuntry's history, and of an eventful and interesting personal life. Rev. John A. Todd, D.D., pastor of the Second Reformed Church of Tarrytown, N. Y., who con- tributed to this work the two chapters on the history of the townships of Greenburgh and Mount Pleasant, is a native of Somerset County, N. J., and a graduate of Rutgers College and of the Theological Seminary of the Reformed Church, at New Brunswick, N. J. After completing his course at the Seminary, in 1848, he was settled towards the latter part of that year as pastor of the Reformed Church of Griggstown, N. J. His personal connection with Westchester County dates back to 1855, when he accepted the call of the Second Reformed Church of Tarrytown, and entered upon his duties as pastor. Having lived since then in themid'it of the historical scenes of which he has written, and having enjoyed the friendship of many whose ancestors had long lived there before them and had borne a prominent part in the great revolutionary struggle, he has had peculiar opportunities of in- formation in regard to the localities described. Among other productions of Dr. Todd's pen may be mentioned his " Discourse on the Character and Death of Washington Irving," 1859; "Memories of the Rev. Peter Labagh, D.D., with Notices of the History of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church in North America," 1860 ; "The Law of Spiritual Growth, a re- view of Boardman's 'Higher Christian Life,'" in the Princeton Review of October, 1860 ; " The Man for the Times," an Oration delivered before the (iovernor of the State, the Trustees, and the Alumni of Rutger's College, at the Dedication of Geological Hall, New Brunswick, N. J., June 18, 1872; "The Posture of the Ministers and People of the Reformed Dutch Church during the Revolution," prepared by request of a committee of the < Jeueral Synod, and published by order of the Synod in the volume of Centennial f>it<- courses, 1876; "The Good Fight and the Victor's Crown,"' a Memorial Discourse on the Life, Character and Services of the Rev. Abraham Moesle, D.D., 1882 ; " Letters from Europe, from Canada and the Saguenay, from Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Cape Breton, and Newfoundland," 1880-1884. Dr. Todd has also published a number of translations from the German and the Spanish, both in prose and verse. Since completing the two chapters included \n this work, he has resigned his pastoral charge, but will continue to reside in Tarrytown, and be chiefly oc- cupied in literary pursuits. James Parton, the well-known historical writer, received his early education in Westchester County. He is a native of England, born at Canterbury, Feb- ruary 9, 1S22. Brought to the United States when but five years of age, he was educated in New York City and vicinity, chiefly at a school at White Plains. For seven years he taught school, finally becoming known as a writer by his editorial contributions to the Home Journal. His first published work, which appeared in 1855, was the " Life of Horace Greeley," It was a successful piece of work, and secured the author employment in the compilation of "The Hu- morous Poetry of the English Language," which a])- peared in 1857. It was followed, in 1859, by the " Life and Times of Aaron Burr," and in 1860 by the "Life of Andrew Jackson." In 1864 his "Life of Benjamin Franklin " appeared. Since then he has been a prolific writer of recognized popularity. In 1856 he married Sara Payson Willis, sister of N. P. Willis, the poet, and herself widely known for her literary productions under the nam deplume of Fanny Fern. John Bigelow, the veteran writer and politician, was, for three years, a resident of Westchester County as one of the inspectors of the state prison at Sing Sing. Mr. Bigelow was appointed to this position in 1845, and during his term of service introduced va- rious reforms in the prison discipline. Mr. Bigelow is a native of Maiden, Ulster County, N. Y. He was born November 25, 1817; graduated at Union Col- lege 1835 ; studied law, and was admitted to the bar in New York City in 1839. For ten years he was engaged in the practice of his profession, occupying himself, at the same time, more or less with literature and literary journalism. In 1850 he became one of the proprietors and editors of the New York Evening Post, and sustained this relation more than ten years. In 1856 he published a life of General Fremont, when the latter was a candidate for the Presidency. He spent the years 1859 and 1860 abroad, writing letters to the Evening Post. He had previously written interesting narratives of trips to Jamaica and Hayti ; the former presenting his views of the practical work- ing of emancipation in Jamaica. Early in the ad- ministration of President Lincoln he was appointed consul at Paris, and upon the death of the minister, Mr. Dayton, in 18()4, was chosen to succeed him. While consul, he published in French, for the in- formation of the people of France, a valuable work on the resources of the United States. Early in 1867 he returned to the United States, bringing with him the original manuscri]Hs of Benjamin Franklin's autobiography, which he published in the following year, with notes and an introduction by himself. Mr. BigeJow is the author of some valuable mono- 624 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. graphs on social and political phases of French his- tory, as well as of many other papers and sketches. In December, 1871, he submitted to Senator Conk- ling, of New York, an elaborate scheme for the com- memoration of the first centennial anniversary of American independence in 1876, which was pub- lished in the New York Tribune, and first directed public attention to the approach of that occasion. Mr. Bigelow was a warm supporter of Governor Til- den for the Presidency, and for some years has been prominent before the public as Mr. Tilden's trusted adviser and intimate friend. Early in 1886 he #as appointed United States Sub-Treasurer at New York, and confirmed by the Senate, but, before qualifying, resigned the position, not caring to undertake its arduous duties. Upon the retirement of Louis J. Jennings, he was appointed editor of the New Y'ork Times, but found the labors of daily journalism too arduous for his tastes. Alice B. Haven, the author of a number of poems and ; tales under the name of " Cousin Alice," is a resident of Mamaroneck. She was born at Hudson, N. Y. Her maiden name was Bradley. She became a contribu- tor to the periodicals of the day at an early age, and in 1846 was married to Joseph C. Neal, author of the " Charcoal Sketches." Upon his death a few months later, she took charge of the literary department of Nerd's Gazette, of which her husband had been a proprietor, and conducted it for several years with success. She also contributed frequently to the lead- ing monthly magazines. " The Gossips of River- town, with Sketches in Prose and Verse," from her pen, was publislied in 1850. She is also the author- ess of a series of popular juvenile works published under the name of " Cousin Alice." In 1853 Mrs. j Neal was married to Mr. Samuel L. Haven, and has [ since resided at Mamaroneck. Cornelius Mathews, the novelist, play-wright and journalist, was a native of Port Chester. He was b(u-n October 28, 1817. His early country life on the banks of Byram River and the rolling uplands of Rye and it-< picturesque lake, made a deep impression on liis mind, as is shown by traces in many pages of his writings. He was among the early graduates of the New York University in 1835, and began his literary career while still a youth. To t\\e Aiiierican Monthly Magazine of 183G, he contributed both prose and verse. He was also a contributor to the New York Reriev and the Kidckerbocker Magazine. In 1837 he was admitted to the bar. In " Behemoth " he pro- duced an original romance, describing the efforts of a supposed anti-Indian race to overcome the ])re-his- toric animal known as the mastodon. From Decem- ber 1840, to May 1842, he edited the Arcturus, [ a monthly magazine, besides writing a comedy and j another novel. In 1843 he ])ublished a volume of poems, and in 1846 his tragedy " Witchcraft," was successfully produced. This was followed by a num- ber of tales and sketches. A collected editi^m of his \ writings was published by the Harper's in 1843. Mr. Mathews was also a constant writer in the journalism of the day and has been prominently identified with the discussion of the international copyright question. William Leggett, the well-known writer, married in New Rochelle and spent the closing years of his life there. Mr. Leggett was born in New York City in the summer of 1802 and was partially educated at Georgetown College. In consequence of his father's failure in business, he was withdrawn before the com- pletion of his course, and in 1819 accompanied his father to Illinois, where the family settled. In 1822 he entered the navy as midshipman but resigned his commission in 1826. Shortly afterwards he published " Leisure Hours at Sea," a volume of verses written at intervals during his naval career. He also wrote a prose tale "The Rifle," in which he portrayed the scenes and incidents of western pioneer life. Other stories followed and were afterwards collected and published under the titles of " Tales by a Country School-master," and '' Tales of the Sea." In 1828 he married Miss Almira Waring of New Rochelle, and in November of the same year commenced the publication of The Critic, a weekly litei'ary periodical. It was discontinued at the end of six months and united with the Mirror, to which Mr. Leggett became a contributor. In the summer of 1829, he became, with Wm. C. Bryant, one of the editors of the New York Evening Post, a position which he retained until December, 1836. He became a zealous Demo- crat and an earnest advocate of free-trade, as well as a strong opponent to the United States Bank. After his retirement from the Evening Post, he established The Plain Dealer, which he conducted with ability. It was involved, however, in the failure of its pub- lisher, and ceased to exist at the end of ten months. Mr. Leggett did not engage in any literary or news- paper work after this, his health having become impaired. He passed the brief remainder of his life at his country place at New Rochelle, which had been his residence since his marriage. In May 1839 he was appointed by President Van Buren, diplo- matic agent to the Republic of Guatemala, but he died while preparing to start for his post, on the 29th of May, 1839. He was a writer of great fluency and persuasive force, and a man who possessed in an emi- nent degree, the courage of his convictions. Elise Justine Bayard, daughter of Mr. Robert Bay- ard, of Glen wood, near Fishkill, was the author of a number of poems, some of which have appeared in the Knickerbocker Magazine and Literary World. She married Mr. Fulton Cutting, and died about 1850. Hon. William Cauldwell, so well-known as the editor and proprietor of the New York Sunday Mer- cury and as a legislative representative of Westches- ter County, was born in the city of New York, Octo- ber 12, 1824. His father, Andrew Cauldwell, who married Margaret, daughter of William Giften, was a LITERATI RH AND LITERARY MEN. G25 native of Kilinaiuock, Scotland, and came to this country about 181 G. Tlie primary education of his son was obtained at the then well-known high school ill Crosby Street, Xew York, but at the early age of eleven he went at the reijuest of his uncle, Adam Giffen, to Louisiana, and lived for a while at St. Mar- tinsville in that State. He afterwards attended school at Opelousas, but his school-life there was somewhat suddenly terminated. His teacher, a Mr. Tinnerman. who Wivs an old soldier of Napoleon, had heard that the noted Colonel David Crockett was to pass through that place on his way to Texas, where he was destined to end his eventful career at the fated Alamo. Re- solved to be one of the brave colonel's followers, he announced his intention to his pupils, and instructed them to inform their parents and guardians that the institution would close. After this, young Cauldwell attended Jefferson College, on the banks of the Mississippi River, south of Placiuemine, where he re- mained three years. He then returned to his native city, and entered a dry-goods store, but at the end of two years, following the bent of his inclination, he drifted into a printing office, where he learned the trade. This office was conducted by Samuel Adams, whose murder by John C. Colt caused a great sensa- tion throughout the country. After the tragic death of Mr. Adams, young Cauldwell secured a position as compositor on the Sunday Atlm, and remained on that paper till about 1850. At that time one-third of the Sunday Mercury was owned by Elbridge G. Page, who was a regular contributor to its columns under the name of " Dow, Jr.," and his " Short Patent Ser- mons," were a well-known feature of the paper, and a source of amusement to thousands of readers. This share Mr. Cauldwell purchased, and Page went to California, where he died some years after. At the time when Mr. Cauldwell became connected with the Mrrcurij, it was a small sheet, with a comparatively limited circulation. He immediately went to work with etiergy and vigor to make it the foremost i)apev of its kind. It was the pioneer of Sunday journalism, and from tliat time to the present its circulation has constantly increased, and its sales now number 7"),0fl0 copies weekly. The best humorous writers of the country have contributed to its columns, and here appeared the brilliant sketches, written by men of whose life and history the world knows nothing, but whose norm de pbnne, are household words, and known the length and breadth of the land. Among these w.'ie 'Mh-pheus C. Kerr," (Robert H. Newell) whose witty papers were the delight of Abraham Lincoln ; " Doesticks," ( Mortimer G. Thompson) ; Charles F. Brown, known the world over as " Artemus Ward ; " Joseph Barber, author of a long series of racy papers under the name of the " Disbanded Volun- teer,'" and a host of others whose i)roductions were the delight of the reader, and made the Sunday Mer- cury a welcome visitor to many thousands of house- holds. I'n'ler liis skillful nnd energetic manngenient. the paper has increased its size to a Journal of fifty- si.x columns, and two of Hoe's perfecting presses are re(iuired to work off its regular edition. In the early part of the year 1848 an association of householders, of whom Mr. Cauldwell's father was one, purchased a tract of land north of the Harlem River, and laid out the village of Morrisania, His father, as well as his brother-in-law and himself, joined in the purchase of one share, or an acre of land, and Mr. Cauldwell's father was the first to erect a house, which he built on " Lot 64 " of the vil- lage of Morrisania, located on Washington Avenue, between what is now One Hundred and Sixty-ninth and One Hundred and Seventieth Streets. In the autumn of 1848 William Cauldwell and family occu- pied a portion of his father's residence, and during this time he purchased from Robert H. Elton a plot of ground at the corner of One Hundred and Sixty- sixth Street (then George Street) and Boston Avenue (then known as the old Boston Post Road), and next north of the famous land-mark known as Pudding Rock, and here built in 1852 the mansion which has since been his home. In 1855 the inhabitants of Morrisania village, unwilling to remain longer a part of the town of West Farms, resolved to form a separate township, which was done in the same year. Of the new town, Gouverneur Morris was, in 1856, the first supervisor, and was succeeded the next year by Mr. Cauldwell, who held the office for fifteen terras, and up to the time (1874) when the town was annexed to the city of New Y'ork. For twelve years Mr. Cauldwell was also a member of the Board of Education of the town of Morrisania, and was chosen chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Westchester County in 1866, and held the same position in 1868 and 1869. In 1867 the Board of Supervisors were equally divided between the Demo- cratic and Republican parties. Mr. Cauldwell re- ceived the Democratic nomination for chairman, having for his competitor ex-Senator Hezekiali D. Robertson. After one hundred and eleven ballots had been taken, the opposing candidates withdrew, and united upon Abraham Hatfield, an old and re- spected citizen of Westchester, as presiding officer for that year. The handsome gold mounted gavels which were presented to Mr. Cauldwell as testi- monials of his service as chairman of the board, are highly prized by him. His first appear- ance in active politics was in 1856, at which time he was an ardent worker to secure the election of .Tames Buchanan, for President, and .John B. Haskin for Congress, and in 1858 took a prominent part in the re-election of Mr. Haskin. In 1863 he was instru- mental in procuring the passage of an act authorizing the construction of a hoi-se railway for Morrisania and West Farms, an enter|)rise which was rapidly pushed to completion, and since its organization has been treasurer of the company. In 1867 the ques- tion of rapid transit began to attract public atten- 626 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. tion, and having been in that j'car elected to the State Senate (his opponent being Hon. James W. Husted), his influence secured the passage of the first act ever passed by the Legislature for that purpose. In 1869 he was re-elected, and in 1871 he again received the unanimous nomination of his party, but was defeated by the Hon. W. H. Robertson. To show Mr. Cauldwell's adaptability for public affairs, he was at one and the same time holding the offices of State Senator, president of the Board of Town Trustees, chairman of the Board of Supervisors of the county, member of the Board of Education, president of the Saving's Bank and chairman of the Democratic General Committee of Morrisania, and in all of these his duties, varied as they were, have been faithfully jjerformed. True to the Union during the war, his duties as super- visor were so faithfully performed, that he was the recipient of most honorable testimonials from the Citizens' Mutual Protection Association, and an en- grossed copy of the action of that body, neatly framed, is among the treasures which adorn his library. In 1874 his fellow citizens again called upon him to go to the Legislature, in order to perfect the some- what rude Act of Annexation, which had been passed in 1873. He was elected by a very large majority, and devoted himself to the matter with such energy that a new act was passed so perfect in its details, that no need to amend it has yet occurred. It is a somewhat curious circumstance, that when elected to the Assembly, he met in the Legislature both of his former competitors for senatorial honors, Hon. W. H. Robertson and Hon. James W. Husted, the former as President of the Senate, the latter as Speaker of the Assembly. With every work of a public nature in the town of Morrisania, Mr. Cauldwell has been prominently identified. During the fifteen terms in which he held the office of supervisor, nearly a mil- lion and a half of dollars passed through his hands ; and his duties were performed with such exactness as to merit and receive the complimentary endorsement of those who were appointed as a board of audit to examine his accounts, and the fact remains on record that for this long service, Mr. Cauldwell received the sum of two hundred and twenty dollars for incidentals (his own services being voluntary), which speaks vol- umes for his unselfishness. It is also worthy of men- tion that the entire quota of eight hundred men re- quired from his town by the various drafts during the war, was filled by volunteers'and substitutes procured through his efforts. Among the men who are much indebted to him for their success in public life, may be mentioned Waldo Hutchins and Clarkson N. Potter, both of whom be- came prominent members of Congress. In 1876 Cauldwell became the sole proprietor of the Sunday Mercury, afad in 1883 he purchased the building No. 3 Park Row, New York, which is fitted with every appliance for a first-class printing and publishing office. He was married October 27, 1845, to Miss Elizabeth, daughter of George Dyer. Their children are Leslie G., Nettie G. and Emily L., wife of Thomas Rogers. His career has been alike creditable to himself, and to the county which he has so ably represented, and in his profession as a publisher, few can show a more successful record, and none a more honorable one. Horace Greeley, the noted journalist, spent much of his leisure at his country home in Westchester County, and breathed his last at Chappaqua. Mr. Greeley was born at Amherst, N. H., February 3, 1811. He received a common-schoool education, which was supplemented by his own unwearied efforts in the acquisition of knowledge. At the age of four- teen, his parents having removed to Vermont, he ob- tained employment as apprentice-boy in the office of Northern Spectator, 'Pwltwey^y^i. In 1830 he re- turned home, owing to the discontinuance of the pa- per, but soon afterwards secured another position as apprentice at Erie, Pa., for fifty dollars a year. In August, 1881, having saved enough money to pay his traveling expenses, besides giving twenty-five or thirty dollars to his father, he arrived in New York City " with a suit of l)lue cotton jean, two brown shirts and five dollars in cash." He obtained work as a journeyman printer, and, in 1834, commenced with Jonas Winchester (afterwards publisher of the New World) a weekly paper, of sixteen pages quarto, called the New Yorker. Although conducted with mu(^h ability it was not successful, and was finally abandoned. While editing this journal Mr. Greeley also conducted, in 1838, The Jeffersonian, published by the Whig Central Committee of the State, and the Log Ca6/n, a campaign paper, published in the Presi- dential contest of 1840. On Saturday, April 20, 1841, Mr. Greeley began the publication of the New York Tribune, which soon obtained recognition for the spirited and independent tone of its utterances. In 1848 he was elected a mem- ber of the United States House of Representatives, and in 1851 visited Europe and was chosen chairman of one of the juries of the World's Fair, at London. While in Paris the Emperor had him impi'isoned for his caustic criticism of the imperial govern- ment, but he was soon released through the inter- vention of the American Minister. His letters from Europe, written to the Tribune, were pub- lished in a volume entitled "Glances at Europe." In 1856 he published his "History of the Struggle for Slavery Extension," and, three years later, " An Over- land Journey from New York to San Francisco," a series of letters reprinted from the Tribune. Of Mr. Greeley's editorial work on the Tribune it may be said that it was one of the most powerful of literary agen- cies in forming the Republican Party and in paving the way for the downfall of slavery. The Tribune was interdicted in many Southern homes, on account of LTTKHATrRE AM ) LITKKAltY MKX. its nidical ami uiiooniproinisiiig utterances, and Hor- ace Greeley drew upon himself tlie wrath of the en- tire slave-holding section. His style was rugged, trenchant and forcible; always breathing the spirit candor and sincerity. In 18(i4 and 1867 were j)ub- lished the two subscrii)tion volumes of Mr. (Jreeley's ''American CJontiict, or History of the War for the Union." The sale soon reached one hundred thou- sand copies, but was cheeked for some years after it had become known that Mr. Greeley had generously consented to athx his name to the bail-bond of Jef- ferson Davis. In 18G7-6S Mr. Greeley contributed to theJVV"- York Lcdin'i- aseries of autobiographic reminiscences, which were afterwards republished in a volume entitled " Re- collections of a busy life." In 1870 he reprinted from the Tribune a series of " Essays on Political Econ- omy," defending the " protection theory," which were dedicated to the memory of Henry Clay. In 1872 he published " What I Know about Farming.'' He also originated and edited the Tribune Almanac, which for many years has been a standard hook of reference. In 1872 Mr. Greeley was nominated for President of the United States by the Liberal Republican and Democratic Conventions, but, as is well known, was overwhelmingly defeated by General Grant. His po- litical reverses and the death of his wife proved too great a strain for his frame, enfeebled by overwork, anxiety and weary vigils at his sick wife's bedside. He died November 29, 1872, at the residence of Ur. Choate, several miles from his home at Chappaqua. Mr. Greeley's strict integrity, guilelessness of charac- ter, simplicity and candor, as well as his lofty aspira- tions and great services to his country, caused him to be universally mourned, and nowhere more so than in Westchester County, where he was so well known. James Watson Webb, the noted journalist, resided at Mount Plea.sant from about 1848 to 18()1, when he was apfiointed minister to Brazil. Born atClaverack, N. Y., February 8, 1802, he entered the United States Army as second lieutenant of artillerj' August, 1819, but resigned in 1827 to take charge of the Mornim/ Courier, which had been established in New York City in May of that year. In 1829 he purchased the Enquirer and combined the two with the name of the Morninf/ Courier and New York Enquirer. He became the sole editor, and, in the following year, sole pro- prietor, which position he retained for thirty-four years. At an early period his paper became identified with the principles of the Whig party, of which it was an able exponent. In 18') 1 he was appointed enginer in chief of the State of New York, with the rank of brigadier-general. In 1849 he was appointed minister to Austria, and in 1861 nunister to Constan- tinople, but this appointment was exchanged for the mission to Brazil. In 1865, being in Paris, he nego- tiated a secret treaty with the Emperor Napoleon for the withdrawal of the French troops from Mexico. In 1869 he resigned the mission to Brazil and re- turned to New York City, where he allerwards re- sided. Henry Ward Beecher, the great pulpit orator and author, has made his summer home at Peekskill for many years. Mr. Beecher comes of a remarkable family. His father, Lyman Beecher, was one of the famous divines of his day, and of his four sons each rose to eminence in the ministry, while his two daughters were equally prominent in literature, ime of them, Mrs. Harriet Beecher Stowe, achieving a world-wide reputation as the author of " Uncle Tom's Cabin." Henry Ward Beecher was born in Litch- field, Conn., June 24, 1813, graduated at Amherst College in 1834, and studied divinity at the Lane Theological Seminary at Cincinnati. He first had charge, as an ordained minister, of a Presbyterian congregation at Lawrenceburgh, Ind., whence he re- moved in 1839 to Indianapolis. In 1847 he left the latter city to accept the pastorate of Plymouth Con- gregational Church at Brooklyn, N. Y., which he has rendered famous throughout the land as the church in which he preaches. Mr. Beecher has been equally successful on the lecture platform, and has long occu- pied an undisputed position as one of the leading orators of the country. He has been a voluminous contributor to the press, and assisted in founding two religious newspapers — The Independent, and The Chris- tian Union, both of which achieved a large circula- tion and commanding influence. He has published a number of essays, lectures, etc., in book form, which have been read by many thousands of people, and his published sermons have long commanded a host of readers. In April, 1865, Mr. Beecher, at the request of the federal government, delivered an oration at Fort Sumter on the anniversary of its fall, and on the occasion of the formal restoration of the national flag by Ma,jor Anderson. Besides his other literary labors, Mr. Beecher edited " The Plymouth Collection of Hymns and Tunes," a work largely used by churches that practice congregational singing. In 1867 he wrote for the New York Ledger, for which he had pre- viously contributed a series of papers teaching the art of profit and enjoyment in familiar objects — a novel entitled, " Norwood ; or. Village Life in New Eng- land," which was afterwards published in book form. In 1872 he published "The Life of Jesus Christ: Part I. — Earlier Scenes," of which the introductory " Overture to the Angels," had appeared in 1869. In the same year he accepted the " Lyman Beecher Lec- tureship on Preaching," then recently founded in the theological department of Yale College. Mrs. Henry Ward Beecher has also contributed to the press, and in 1859 published anonymously a work of fiction, " From Dawn to Daylight : A Simple Story of a West- ern Home, by a Minister's Wife." Her "Motherly Talks with Young Housekeepers " appeared in 1873. Alexander H. Wells was born January 18, 1805, at Cambridge, Washington County, N. Y.. to which his father, Daniel, son of Edmonds Wells, had emi- 628 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. grated from Hebron, Tolland County, Conn., about the beginning of the Revolutionary War. Edmonds Wells was one of six patentees of the tract twelve miles square now embraced in the townships of Cam- bridge, White Creek and Jackson, Washington Coun- ty. On his mother's side Alexander H. was descended frem Rev. Elijah Lothrop, a stern Whig, who was the Congregationalist minister at Gilead, Tolland County, Conn., during the Revolution. Gilead was also the residence of Rev. Dr. Peters, the historian, who was roughly treated by his patriotic neighbors and finally driven out of the town, whence he escaped to England. Hannah, the daughter of Dr. Lothrop, married Daniel Wells. When a girl, she saw the people riding Peters on a rail, and when he returned to this country the reminiscence was renewed in con- versation between them. Alexander H. was the youngest son and sixteenth child of his parents. He graduated at Cambridge Academy and devoted his life to politics and journalism. In 1840 Governor Sew- ard appointed him surrogate of Westchester County, and in 1848 he was appointed warden of Sing Sing prison by David D. Spencer, Isaac N. Comstock and John B. Gedney, the first inspectors under the con- stitution of 1847. In the fall of 1848 he was himself elected to Gedney's place in the board. He was edi- torof the Weekly T'/z/jcs, Haverstraw, Rockland County, four years ; of the Hudson Hirer Chronicle, Sing Sing, three years; and of the Daihj Times, Troy, three years. As a journalist he possessed much force and facility, but his headstrong disposition carried him into fre- quent situations from which he was forced to retreat. As usual with men of his combative temperament — for he was happiest in a controversy — he had warm friends and bitter enemies. In 1829 he married Mary Collins, of Bloomfield, X. J., and they had two children, one of whom, Mary Elizabeth, was born January 3, 1S38, and died Au- gust 7, 1848. Margaret, the oldest daughter, married Horace Stone, a St. Louis merchant, and died in 1881, leaving one son, Hamilton Stone. Mr. Wells died at Sing Sing December 21, 1857, and is buried in Dale Cemetery, beside his youngest daughter and his wife. The latter survived him fifteen years, dying October 21, 1872. Mr. James Wood has contributed largely to the lit- erary development of Westchester County by his writings, his lectures and his earnest efforts to pro- mote intellecttial activity and especially historical re- seiirch. He is the author of two chapters in this work — that on the Indians of Westchester County and another on the Early Exi)lorations and Settlers of the County, and has aided the compiler in many ways— by suggestions, by correcting manuscripts and read- j ing proof and by lending his valuable support in var- ious directions to the jiromotion of the enterprise. He is justly regarded as one of the most intelligent and public-soirited gentlemen in the county and as j ne of its most cultured and useful citizens. James Wood was born November 12, 1839, at the place where he now resides, and where his father and grandfather lived before him, one mile north of the present village of Mount Kisco, in the town of Bedford. He bears his grandfather's name. His father's name was Stephen. He died in 1876. His brothers were j Henry, Charles and John J., of whom the first alone is now living. There were three sisters. James is the youngest of the family. The family came from Long Island early in the last century. They are descended from Jonas Wood, who came from Halifax, in England, in 1635, and was named in the patent of Hempstead in 1644. He was connected with the family of Lord Halifax, j Mr. Wood's mother was Phoebe, daughter of Caleb I Underbill, of Yorktown, a descendant of John Un- derbill, who came from Ettington, in Warwickshire, England, and settled at Oyster Bay, Long Island, in 1667. The Underbill mansion and buildings are still standing at Ettington, while numerous brasses and t monuments to members of the family remain in the ! old parish church. The estates are now in the pos- j session of Lord Frere's family — the Shirleys — with whom the Underbills intermarried. Another John ; Underbill of this family was chaplain to Queen Eliz- abeth, and was made Bishop of Oxford in 1589. Mr. Wood married, June 7, 1866, Emily Hollings- j worth Morris, daughter of Henry Morris, of Phila- j delphia. They have thi-ee children, — Ellen M., Caro- I lina M. and Levi HoUingsworth. Mr. Wood attended the Reynolds Academy, at Bedford, in 1850 and '51, Westtown School, Pa., in 1851 and '52, and entered the sophomore class in Haverford College, Philadelphia, in 1853. From this college he has the degree of Master of Arts. He is now a member of the cori)oration of the college and of the board of managers. Mr. Wood has never held any political office except that of supervisor of his. native town in 1862 and '63. He has never allowed his name to be used in connec- tion with a political nomination. Mr. W^ood has taken a great interest in the cultiva- tion of his farm and in importing and breeding fine sheep. He has been a frequent contributor to the agricultural press, has delivered many agricultural addresses, has taken an active part in the discussions of the Bedford Farmers' Club and has held official po- sitions in the New York State Agricultural Society. He was one of the original incorporators of the Westchester County Historical Society, and has been its president since 1879. He has read a number of papers before the society. He has taken especial in- terest in local Indian history and has an extensive collection of Indian implements and remains. He has also taken an active interest in the West- chester County Bible Society, which has long been an important auxiliary to the American Bible Society. He has been its treasurer since 1878. Mr. AVood is a member of the religious Society of LITERATI RE AM) LITERARY MEN. (529 Friends, as were also his father and grandfather. He has been the clerk (presiding officer) of their Yearly Meeting for the States of New York and Vermont and is now clerk of the Representative Meeting. He is a member of the Missionary and Educational Boards of that denomination. Mr. Wood has frequently ai)peared upon the lecture platform, with a variety of subjects, in aid of various institutions and charities. In this way he has largely sustained the Mount Kisco Lyceum and Free Library Association, of which he has been the president since its organization, in 1S80. Besides the management of his farm and personal aflairs. Mr. Wood's most active business connections have been with a number of estates as their trustee. He is the president of the Genesee Salt Company, whose works are at Pifford, in Livingston County, New York, and have the capacity for producing five thousand bushels of salt per day. He is also presi- dent of the Oakwood Cemetery Association. Mr. Wood's family have been unfortunate in hav- ing their homesteads destroyed by fire. A uew house, built by his father, was burned in 1819. The one built upon the same site, and in which Mr. Wood was born, was destroyed in 1861*. Upon this site Mr. Wood, in 1870, built the large stone house in which he now resides. The farm buildings are largely of stone, and, with the green-houses, grapery, museum of curiosities, vineyards and orchards of many kinds of fruits, combine to make an attractive country home. Mr. Joseph Barrett, author of the town histories of Bedford, North Castle and New Castle, in this work, is a gentleman of cultured literary taste and a clear and interesting writer. He was born in Bedford, May 25, 1840, was prepared for college at the old Bedford Acadamy and graduated at Lafayette Col- lege, Easton, Pa., in 1861. He was school commis- sioner, i.e. Superintendent of Schools, for the third school district of Westchester County from 1867 to 1875 inclusive and occasionally prepared and read papers before teachers' societies, and once before the State Association of Superintendents and Commis- sioners. On the 4th of July, 187i), he read an histor- ical address on the town of Bedford. Mr. Barrett was one of the original members of the Westchester County Historical Society and in 1878 read a paper before the Society on " Enoch Crosby, the Spy of the Neutral Ground." For many years years he was sec- retary of the Bedford Farmers' Club, being then a farmer, and has written a number of articles on agri- cultural topics. From July, 1881, to July, 1885, he was special deputy collector in the New York Cus- tom House, and from November, 1884, to July, 1885, cashier of that institution. William Allen Butler, the noted author of " Noth- ing to Wear," and of a number of other poetical and prose compositions, is a resident of Yonkers. He is the son of the eminent lawyer and politician, Benja- min F. Butler, of New York, who was a member of the cabinets of Jackson and Van Buren. William Allen Butler was born in Albany, in 1825. After a course of study at the University of the City of New York, he read law in his father's office and then went abroad, where he remained a year and a half. Al- though since 1855 engrossed with the practice of his profession in New York City, Mr. Butler has devoted much time to literature. Among his writings are some spirited translations from the German poet Uhland, a series of biographical and critical sketches of the old masters, some pleasant descriptions of Gld World localities, and a number of poems, including clever satires on social follies. Of these the most successful was " Nothing to Wear," which was printed anonymously in 1857. Many editions were published in England as well as in this country and the poem was translated into both French and German. In 1871 Mr. Butler jiublished " Lawyer and Client,'' a valuable exi)osition of the relations, rights and duties which ought to exist between the two. In the same year appeared a volume of " Poems," containing the translations from Uhland, "Nothing to Wear," poems of travel and other verses. Other published works of Mr. Butler are " The Bible By Itself," an address be - fore the New York Bible Society, 1860 ; " Martin Van Buren, Lawyer, Statesman and Man," 1862, a compre- hensive though brief biography of that eminent statesman. Mr. Butler has lived in Yonkers nearly a score of years, and his family by their culture and taste, to- gether with the accessory advantage of wealth and liberality in the use of it, have been one of many who have made themselves felt in the city socially and in many varieties of useful work. Frederic S. Cozzens, author of the "Sparrowgrass Papers," etc., was a resident of Yonkers. He was boi n in New York City, March 5, 1818, and died at Brook- lyn, December 23, 1869. Mr. Cozzens' occupation was that of a wine merchant, but he early evinced a taste for literature, and contributed a number of pojv ular sketches to the Knickerbocker and Putnam'x Magazines. In 1853 he published a volume of sketches in prose and verse, entitled " Prismatics, by Richard Hay ward." It was illustrated by Darley, Hensett, Elliott and others. His " Sparrowgrass Papers," de- scribing a cockney's residence in the country, were first written for Ptdnam'.n Monthly, but in 1856 were published in book form. He also published, in connection with his business, a pleasant miscellany, entitled The Wine Press, which he continued to edit for seven years, relinquishing the publication on the breaking out of the Civil War. A collection of essays on gastronomic and kindred topics from its pages was published, in 1867, with the title, "Sayings of Dr. Bushwhacker and Other Learned Men." Another book, " Acadia ; or A Sojourn Among the Blue Noses," had been published nine years before, in 1858, and one year later, in 1868, his last work, a 630 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. " Memorial of Fitz-Greeue Halleck," was published by the New York Historical Society. The twin brothers, Willis Gaylord Clark and Lewis Gaylord Clark, were born at Otisco, Onondaga Coun- ty, N. Y., in 1810. Willis, on the completion of his education, went to Philadelphia and commenced the publication of a weekly paper, similar to the JVew Yoi'k Mirror, which wa.s soon discontinued. He then associated himself with Rev. Dr. Brantley, a Baptist clergyman, as assistant editor of the Columbian Star, a religious publication, from which position he retired to take charge of the Philadelphia Gazette, the oldest daily newspaper in that city. He became its proprietor and remained at its head for the rest of his life. Mr. Clark died in 1841. He was the author of a number of short poems and of a series ofshort essays, anecdotes, etc., entitled '' Ollopodiana," which were published in the Knickerbocker Magazine, then edited by his brother Lewis. The latter conducted the Knick- erbocker for many years, and became wideh' known by his monthly "Editor's Table," a selection from which was published with the title, "Knick-knacks from an Editor's Table,'' in 1852. He died at Pier- mont-on-the-Hudson, Novembers, 1873. The noted naval commander, Matthew Galbraith Perry, whose claim to literary distinction rests upon the notes which he furnished for an interesting ac- count prepared by F. L. Hawks and George Jones, c)f his naval expedition to Japan, resided at one time in Mount Pleasant, on the Sing Sing road. Commodore Perry was born at Newport, R. I., in 1794, and was a brother of the famous Oliver Hazard Perry, who fought the battle of Lake Erie. As commander of the " Cyane," he fixed the first settlement of Liberia, and in a cruise in the schooner "Shark," in 1821-24, he captured several pirates. He took an active part in the Mexican War, and in 1852-54 commanded the expedition to Japan, with which country he negotiated an important treaty, ^larch 21, 1854. Another great naval hero, Admiral D. G. Farragut, was a resident of Westchester County (Hastings, in the town of Greenburgh) in 18<51-62. John Orde Creighton, another commodore of the United States navy, who was born in New York City, died at Sing Sing, October 13, 1838. Commo- dore Josejih B. Hull, of the Ignited States navy, was also born in Westchester. John Lorimer Worden, who commanded the iron- clad " Monitor " in the famous engagement with the ironclad "Merrimac," in Hampton Roads, March 9, 1862, was born at Mount Pleasant on March 12, 1817. He was appointed a midshipman in the I'nited States n&xy on January 12, 1835; lieutenant, November 30, 1846; commander, May 27, 1862 ; captain, February 3, 1863 ; and commodore. May 27, 1868. In April, 1861, he was sent with dispatches to Fort Pickens, and captured by the Confederates, and kept in prison seven months. In the engagement with the " Merri- mac," Captain Worden's eyes were severely injured by the explosion of a shell from the " Merrimac '" upon the eyehole of the pilot-house. In the command of the ironclad " Montauk," of the South Atlantic Blockading Squadron, he engaged Fort McAllister, January 27, 1 863, and on February 28th attacked and destroyed the privateer steamer " Nashville," under the guns of that fort. He was in the attack of Charleston, under Du})ont, April 7, 1863, and on De- cember 1, 1869, was appointed superintendent of the United States Naval Academy, at Annapolis. Rev. David Cole, D.D., has been a Yonkers pastor since 1865, and is the oldest of eight children of Rev. Isaac D. Cole and Anna Maria Shatzel. On his father's side he is of unbroken Holland descent. The original spelling of the family name was "Kool." His mother's parents were John M. Shatzel, Jr., and Barbara Wood. The former was a son of John M. Shatzel and Anna Maria Tremberin, both born at Frankfort-on-the-Main, and the latter, a daughter of Ebenezer Wood, of Welsh, and Margaret Hubbard, or Hoeber, of Holland descent. On preserved New Amsterdam (New York) records, the name " Kool " first appears with official papers ol' 1630 and 1633. Lenart Kool, as Director Minuit's deputy secretary, signed the famous patent to Kiliaen Van Rensselaer for a tract of land on the Hudson River, August 13, 1630, and Barent Jacobsen Kool, as an officer of the West India Company, with six others, signed a " Condition and Agreement " between Jacob Van Curler and certain Indian chiefs on the 8th of June, 1633. Whether these were related is not known. The latter was the earliest American ancestor of Rev. Dr. Cole. The form of his name in- dicates that he was a son of Jacob Kool. The father is not known to have come to America. The son, in an affidavit madein January, 1645, and still preserved, represents himself as then thirty-five years old, which shows that he was born (of course in Holland) about 1610. The prominent position he occupied in 1633, at twenty-three years of age, proves that he must then have been in New Amsterdam and with the West India Company a considerable time. Without doubt he came to the colony with Minuitand hissuite about I 1625 or 162(). He retained his connection with the company till the surrender of 1664, occupying even to that date one of its houses for its officers on Bridge Street. After this he followed some of his children to Ulster County, where his name appears on a list of male inhabitants as late as 1689. The date of his death is not known. The line from him to Rev. Dr. Cole is in hand without a break. It is widely represented by de- scendants in different States of the Union, but it is especially to be noted that from its earliest appear- ance in America it has never failed to be represented by resident families in the city of New York. ]. Barent Jacobsen Kool and Marretje Leenderts had nine children, viz.: Jacob Barentsen, Aeltje, LTTERATUHH AND Dievertje, Apollouia, Leendert, Arent, (Ist) Theunis A rent, (2d), and Pieter. 2. Jacob Barentsen Kool (born before 1089) and Marretje Simons had eight children, viz.: Barent(lst), Barent (2d), Simon, Arent, JIarretje, Barent (3d), Chiartje and Jacob. ■i. Jacob Kool (baj)ti/cd at Kingston, N. Y., Janu- ary 1, 1073) and Barbara llanse settled at Tappan,. X. Y., about 1695, and united with the New Reformed Church, organized the year before. They had six children born in Tappan between 1G9') and 1707, viz.: Geertje, Jacob, Jr., Tryntje, Jan, Barent and Abra- ham. This family first introduced the Kool line into the lower part of Orange (now Eockland) County, where its representatives have been numerous and prominent ever since. 4. Abraham Kool (baptized at Tappan November 2, 1707) and Annetje Meyer had eight children, viz. ; Jacob, Ide (1st), Ide (2d), Isaac, Johannes, Rachel, Abraham and Andreas. 5. Isaac Kool (born Januarj- 21st and baptized at Tappan February 15, 1741) and Catharine Scrven (l)orn at Tappan August 28, 1747) were married at Tappan by Rev. Samuel Verbryk, pastor of the Tap- pan Reformed Church, October 15, 1764. They set- tled at New City, in their native county, and had fif- teen children born there, viz.: Abraham, Breghje, Rachel, John, Jacob, Anna, Elizabeth, David, Isaac, Jr., Mary, Margaret, Philip, Catharine, Andrew and Sarah. In 1794 the parents removed to Broadalbin (or Fondabush), in P^ulton County, where the father died and was buried in October, 1800. The mother, after his death, returned to Rockland County, where she died in 1832. It was in this generation that the spelling of the family name was changed to " Cole." The pronunciation under its earlier and later forms was the same. The change in spelling was adopted to protect the name against mispronunciation by an incoming people not acquainted with Hol- land forms and sounds. 6. David Cole (born at New City September 26th and baptized at Clarkstown, by Rev. Nicholas Lan- sing, October 5, 1777) married Elizabeth Meyer, at Kakiat, .January 11, 1798, the ceremony being per- formed by Rev. George G. Brinkerhoft'. The wife was a daughter of Johannes Meyer and Tryntje Van Hou- ten, both born in the county, but of Holland descent. These had three children — Isaac D., Catharine and Eliza. The last died unmarried in 1851. The second, Mrs. Thomas Lippincott, who died September 23, 1881, is represented numerously by descendants in New York City and elsewhere. The first was the father of Rev. Dr. Cole. 7. Rev. Isaac D. Cole was born at Spring Valley, Rockland County, N. Y., January 25th and baptized at Kakiat by Rev. Geo. G. Brinkerhofi", March 25, 1799. He was a resident of New York City with brief intervals, from 1801 to 1826, and was married, November 3, 1821, by Rev. Christian Bork, to Anna ' LITERARY MEN. 631 Maria Shatzel, born in the city November 3, 1797. His history is given with fulness of detail in the " History of Rockland County," published in 1884, under the editorial direction of his son. After sev- eral years of teaching in New York City he entered the Theological Seminary at New Brunswick, N, J., in 1826, and having been licensed to the missionary in 1829, at once became pastor of the Reformed Church at Tappan, in wliich his ancestors had wor- shipped from its beginning, more than a century and a quarter before, and continued in his pastorate, with an interval of one year, till his retirement from the active duties of the ministry in 1864, at sixty-five years of age. Subsequently and until his death, on the 80th of August, 1878, he lived at Spring Valley upon the family home-ground of more than a hun- dred years, which he had inherited from his father. His sterling character, his remarkable gifts as an in- structor, his special life-work in the ministry, the valuable influence of his precept and example and the preciousness of his memory are so fully put on record in the hi.story mentioned above that they need no reproducing here. The children of Rev. Isaac D. Cole and Anna Maria Shatzel were eight, viz. : David, Caroline, Elizabeth, Juliana (1st), Juliana (2d,) Cathar- ine Amelia, Margaret Ann, Benjaiiiiii Wood and Isaac D., Jr. Of these children, Juliana (1st), Caro- line Elizabeth (Mrs. Dr. James J. Stephens), Catha- rine Amelia (Mrs. Benjamin L. Disbrow) and Isaac D., Jr., late president of the Knickerbocker Fire In- surance Company, of New York City, have passed away. What has thus been given shows that Rev. Dr. Cole belongs to one of the oldest New York families. It is not believed that there are any older, though there may be a very few others as old. The family is of the Reformed Church of Holland from its very start in that country. It was identified with the organization of the first Reformed Church in New Amsterdam (the " Church in the Fort ") and subse- quently with the organization of the Reformed Churches of Kingston, Tappan, Clarkstown and West Hempstead (or Kakiat), and it also, before 1800, founded a Reformed Church in Fondabush, Fulton County, which, however, was changed to a Presby- terian Church in 1825. Rev. Dr. Cole is thus, through his father, of strictest Holland descent. He I'eels the derivation of liis name irom so historic a stock and is equally alive to the character for sim- plicity and spotless business integrity which has been handed down through the American generations. With the exception of the first member of the line, who was a government ofl5cer, all the generations, down to his father, were farmers. All of them were continuously, and many of them ofiicially, connected with the life and work of the Reformed Churches. Purity of life, probity in dealing, steadiness of aim and purpose have been the heritage handed down to him, and this heritage he cherishes with the most 632 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COTOTY. sacred reverence and would not exchange for any other form of inheritance whatever. Rev. Dr. Cole was born at Spring Valley September 22, 1822, during a brief summer visit of his parents, then residents of New York City, to the old family homestead. Being the first child of a conscientious and gifted teacher, his training naturally engaged his fathei''s close thought. The course taken with him was such as to give to his mind an early and strong bias for the study of languages, without, however, impair- ing his education in other branches. But his father's view of the importance of languages was such that he was started in Latin at four, in Greek at six and in Hebrew at nine, and was prepared for college at twelve years of age. No effort was spared to lay his foundations solidly. The consequence was the awaken- ing of an enthusiasm for languages which has shaped a life, and is one of its leading characteristics. From twelve to sixteen years of age study was suspended duriug the summers, and training on a farm substi- tuted, for the building up of a physical and mental strength that had been too severely taxed. The winters, however, continued to be devoted to study. In November, 1838, at sixteen years of age, he entered the Grammar School of Rutgers College. After a year spent in reviewing old studies, and especially in earnest work upon mathematics, he entered the Sophomore Class of the college in October, 1839, from which, in July, 1842, he was graduated. Being too well prepared for college at his entrance, he had thrown himself upon his past studies to a large extent, and as a result, came to his graduation, though with credit, yet without distinction. At once after graduation Le began to teach near his father's residence at Tappan, and continued teaching from August, 1842, to No- vember, 1858, more than sixteen years, devoting him- self through almost the whole period to the teaching i of the Latin and Greek languages alone. During his work as a teacher he prepared many young men for college, several of whom were graduated with honor. His greatest successes as a teacher were attained during several years in the principalship of an academy at Trenton, N. J., during which his students were sent to Princeton, Rutgers, Harvard, Yale, Union, Am- herst and the Universities of New York and Pennsyl- vania. In 1855, prominently through his influence, the State Normal School of New Jersey was brought into being, of which, by the appointment of Governor Rodman M. Price, he was one of the first trustees. In 1857 he became a professor in that institution, resign- ing his trusteeship to accept the post. For several years during his teaching life, however, he had been privately studying for the ministry, and, in connection with his teaching work, had established and carried on an enterprise, on which, as a foundation, many years ago, grew up the present Fifth Presbyterian Church of Ti'enton. Having induced his pastor and friends of the First Presbyterian Church of that city I to build a house for the^ purpose in the suburbs, he founded and conducted a large Sunday-school in it, and soon after began, while still a layman and prin- cipal of an academy, to preach twice in it every Sab- bath, and lecture in the houses of his hearers on Thursday evenings. From this work and from his professorship in the State Normal School he passed into the ministry in 1858. Several offers of pulpits were at once made to him, but he decided to accept the charge of the new Reformed Church at East Millstone, N. J. Here he was ordained November 23, 1858, and remained pastor until April 1, 1863. In February of that year he had been called to the pro- fessorship of the Greek language and literature in Rutgers College, and had accepted the call. Entering upon his new post March Ki, 1863, he remained in it till January 1, 1866. During this period of three years, however, he was several times urged to re-enter the pastorate. The teaching in the college was a fascination to him, but the attraction to the pulpit proved the stronger, and in December, 1865, a call from the Reformed Church of Y^onkers was accejited. From the 10th of that month he has been connected, as its pastor, with the history and life of that church. During his professorship at New Brunswick the de- gree of Doctor of Divinity was conferred upon him by the trustees of Franklin and Marshall College, at Lancaster, Pa. The period from 1861 to 1865 was with Dr. Cole one of strong decision and great activity. From the firing on Sumter he took the most pronounced position for the Union, and during his pastorate at East Mill- stone, and his college life at New Brunswick, was at all times forward in sustaining the government and making sentiment for it by writing and speaking in its behalf Many incidents of interest in his history in that connection might be related, but want of space excludes them here. Dr. Cole's activity as a writer began soon after his graduation from college, but confined itself for some years to newspaper articles. His first book was a small " Manual of English Grammar,'' published in 1848, and his only other b(»ok written during his teaching life was a larger one, entitled " Principles of English Grammar Applied," issued in 1853. These books were intended mostly for his own use, but had a con- siderable circulation in the schools of New Jersey in their day. It was not till about 1855 that he began to appear much as a public speaker. At this time, in addition to his evangelistic work, before alluded to, in Trenton, he became deeply enlisted in a new educational movement in the State of New Jersey, and, by permission of the State Legislature, joined with others in pressing the interests and wants of the public schools upon the members assembled for the purpose in joint session. He also formed one of a company who visited the various counties of the State, speaking everywhere for the cause of popular education. Several of his addres.ses on these subjects. LITERATURE Ax\I from 1855 onward, were printed. Besides this, he spoke in various places upon topics connected with higher education. In December, 1854, he read an important paper at the Smithsonian Institution on " Classical Education," which was published in Bar- nard's American Journal of Education, and drew commendation from both sides of the Atlantic. In 1855-56 he was New Jersey editor of the ^eic Yor/: Teacher and wrote many of its editorials. After his entrance into the ministry, in 1858, he dropped speaking and writing in the special interest of edu- cation, finding enough to do for his pulpit and in the defense of the Union cause during the war. During his ministry he has been absorbed in two specialties, the one being his principal and the other his second- ary object of pursuit. The former is the critical study of the Bible origin- als and the development of the Bible's thought, and the latter is the tracing of Divine Providence through history. Of the results of his Bible study, he has written and printed very much, but not in pamphlet or book-form. Upon history, his researches have been mostly of local bearing, being developments of church and local annals. In October, 18(35, he delivered an his- torical address upon his first church at East Millstone, then ten years old ; in 18t;8, another upon his church at Yonkers, then twenty-five ; and in 1883, a third upon the same church, then forty years old. All these were published by the congregations. His Thanksgiving sermon of 1866 wius also published by his people, and his Centennial Thanksgiving sermon (1876) on "Our American Kepublic, the Child of Special Providence," was called for by a representa- tion from the uniting congregations that heard it, and published. The General Synod of the Reformed Church published also a sermon he preached before it in 1S74 on " Ofierings to the Lord," being its " An- nual Sermon on Benevolence." In 1876, Dr. Cole himself published a large octavo volume, the fruit of very great labor, giving the genealogy of his own Holland family from 1580 to date. In October, 1882, at the call of his fellow-citizens of Yonkers, he de- livered in the open air, to many thousands of people, a bi centennial oration commemorative of the found- ing of the Manor (now the city) Hall of Yonkers, which was printed and very widely circulated. In 1883 and 1884 he edited the " History of Rockland County," alluded to above. In Sei)tember, 1884, as president of the General Synod of the Reformed Church, he presided at the installation of Rev. Jolin G. Lansing, D.D., as professor in the Theological Seminary at New Brunswick, and delivered a sermon on " God's noteworthy preparations of the two original languages of the sacred Scriptures to become the conveyancers of His divine revelation to men, and His no less noteworthy preparations of a modern language to effect the spread of this revelation over the earth." The sermon was published with the proceedings of the day. In October of the same year, 59 ) LITERARY MEN. 033 in the same capacity, he presided at the first session of the centennial of the same seminary, and delivered the " Response " to the " Address of Welcome," which was printed in a volume with the proceedings. His latest publication has been the "History of Yon- kers," contained in this work. In all his published historical addresses he has had in view one controlling object — to hold up in the most conspicuoub light the I'rovidence of God as manifested in the details of church, historical, community and family life. Dr. Cole married, on the 18th of April, 1844, Abbie D. Wyckoff, a daughter of Jacob Wyckoff and Eliza- beth Van Deventer, of New Brunswick, both of purest Holland descent. The children have been six in number, of whom the third died in infancy, in 1855, viz.: Mary Elizabeth (wife of Rev. James Henry Bertholf, of Nassau, Rensselaer County, N. Y.), Isaac D., Ella, J. Wyckoff, Frank Howard and Edward R. None of the sons are married. Rev. and Mrs. Ber- tholf have four children, viz. : Harry W., Charles Howard, Bessie and Griffith Diirst. Thomas Henry Edsall is descended from Samuel Edsall, Esq., a native of Reading, Berkshire, Eng- land, by his marriage with Ruth Woodhull, daughter of Richard Woodhull, Estj., a native of Thenford, Northamptonshire, England. Samuel Edsall came to Boston, Mass., in 1648, settled among the Dutch in New Amsterdam in 1655, and afterwards became quite prominent in the colonial aflairs of New Yc^rk and New Jersey. Mr. Woodhull came to Lynn, Mass., about 1G40, and was an early settler and leading citi- zen of Southampton and Brookhaven, L. I. Other immigrant ancestors of Mr. Edsall came in the seven- teenth century from Holland and France (Huguenot). In the last century several of his progenitors bore arms in the old French War and in support of Amer- ican independence during the Revolution. He is the only son of the late Thomas Edsall, Esq., and Phebe A. Jones, daughter of the late Hon. Nathaniel Jones, of Orange County, N. Y., and was born Octo- ber 7, 1840, in the city of New York. After complet- ing his academic education he entered Brown Univer- sity at seventeen, and was graduated in 1861. The following year he assisted in raising a regiment of in- fantry, which was afterwards consolidated to form the One Hundred and Seventy-sixth New York Volun- teers — "Ironsides" — of which he was commissioned adjutant. The regiment was assigned to the " Banks Expedition " and served in the Department of the Gulf. During the summer and autumn of 1863 ilr. Edsall was detached and assigned to duty at head- quarters under the chief engineer of the department. In November he returned to New York and was mus- tered out with his regiment. He then studied law with O'Connor & Dunning and at Columbia College Law School, was admitted to the bar in the spring of 1865, and has since been in practice in New York City. He is now a member of the firm of Dunning, Edsall, Hart & Fowler. 634 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. For several years Mr. Edsall has devoted much attention to historical and genealogical researches, and has contributed several papers on those subjects to the New York Historical and the New York Gen- ealogical and Biographical Societies, some of which have been published. He has given special study to the early history of King's Bridge and its neighbor- hood, where he has resided for several years, in Spuy- ten Duyvil. Mr. Edsall has prepared a very inter- esting and valuable history of that town for this work, which is published elsewhere. He is a member of the ' University Club, the New York Historical Society, a | trustee of the New York Genealogical and Biograph- i ical Society and the vice-president of the Society of ' the Sons of the Revolu- tion. Josiah Sherman Mitch- ell, son of Minot Mitchell, one of the most distin- guished members of the Westchester County bar, was born at White Plains, February 2, 1816. He studied law in his father's office, and was admitted to the bar in 1845. He is still (1886) pursuing the practice of his profession, and resides in White Plains. Mr. Mitchell has devoted a good deal of study to the history of his locality, and is recognized as an authority upon that subject. Besides writing the very able and inter- esting history of White Plains for this work, he has written a number of other articles on sub- jects relating to White Plains, or other points in the county, but none of them have hitherto appeared in printed form. He prepared two papers on "The French in Westchester County," ■which were read before a social club of White Plains, and has read two papers before the Westchester County Historical Society, of which he is a member, one of them being a "Life of Ann Hutchison," the other a review of the events succeeding the battle of White Plains, giving reasons for Howe's retreat. A paper has also been written by Mr. Mitchell in which he brings forward arguments to show that the sect of Methodists acquired a foothold in Westchester County before having done so in New Y'ork City, — a conclu- sion contrary to the received teaching on that point, which is, that the Methodist Societv in this countrv acquired its first converts in the latter place. The paper is deposited with the pastor of the Methodist Episcopal Church at White Plains. Mr. Mitchell has been twice married. His first wife was Elizabeth Anderson, daughter of the Hon. Joseph H. Anderson. Their children were William Anderson, who is now a manager of one of the de- partments of the New York Safe Deposit Company, of New York City, and Anna Caroline. His second wife was Margaret Louise Dusenbury. Their only child is Charles Halsey. Rev. William Samuel Coffey was born in the city of New York in 1827, and in 1847 graduated from Columbia College. After studying for the ministry he graduated from the General Theological Sem- inary of the Protestant Episcopal Church in 1850, and was ordained deacon in the same year at Trin- ity Church, New York. In 1851 he received the full orders of the priest- hood at Grace Church, Brooklyn Heights. On February 1, 1852, he be- came rector of St. Paul's Church, East Chester, and his pastorate has continu- ed to the present time, a period of over thirty-four years, during which he has been most efiicient and active in his minis- terial labors, and has greatly endeared himself to the community. He has held the commissions of the State as chaplain of the Third Regiment and consequently of the Twenty-seventh Regi- ment N. Y. S. N. G. In - 1856 he founded Trin- ity Church at Mount Vernon. Mr. Coffey's literary work has only been second in importance and value to his labors in the ministrj-. He delivered the centennial address of the laying of the corner-stone of St. Paul's Church, East Chester, in October, 1865, and a memorial paper in 1875 upon the life and services of Rev. Thomas Standard, D.D., at the dedication of a tablet erected in his honor in the church. He also delivered a historical address in October, 1884, in St. Peter's Church, Westchester, upon the eminent career of Rev. Samuel Seabury as rector of that parish. To these volumes he has con- tributed three important chapters, — " The General History of Westchester County from 1683 to 1774 ;" LITERATURE AND LITERARY MEN. 635 " The General History of Westchester County from 1783 to 1860," and the "History of the town of East Chester," which is a complete review of that town in all its social, political and religious aspects from the earliest period to the present year. The public ad- dresses of Mr. Coffey upon religious and secular topics and occasions have been numerous, while for many years he has contributed to the newspapers of the country the results of his profound thought and thorough scholarship as brought to bear upon the questions which interest mankind. On October 4, 1S7G, he married Henrietta, daughter of Henry P. Kellogg, of New Rochelle, and has two sons, both of whom are living. John William Draper, M.D., LL.D., the late chemist and physiologist, was born in Liverpool, England, May 5, 1811, and at the time of his death, in 1886, lived at Irvington, in Westchester County. He was educated at the University of London. Emi- grating to America in 1833, he continued his chemical and medical studies at the University of Pennsyl- vania, where he took the degree of M.D. in 1836. Besides holding prominent professorships in various seats of learning, he contributed a large number of valuable works to the literature of America. Between 1838 and 1857 he furnished to the Edinburgh Philo- sophical Journal about forty treatises, besides con- tributing to other scientific journals. He was the author of a "Treatise on the Organization of Plants," 4to, 1844; a popular "Text-Book on Chemistry," 1846; another on "Natural Philosophy," 1847; a " History of the Intellectual Development of Europe ; " "Thoughts on the Future Civil Policy of America; " " History of the American Civil War," 3 vols., 1867-68 ; and " Memoirs on the Chemical Action of Light." His most elaborate work is a treatise on " Human Physiology, Statical and Dynamical," 1856. Robert Bonner, the proprietor of the New York Ledger, born in Londonderry, Ireland, about 1820, of Scotch-Presbyterian ancestry, is or was a resident of Westchester. While a lad in the printing-office of the Hartford Courant it is said he could set up more type in a day than any man in the State. He went to New York City in 1844, purchasing the Ledger, then an obscure sheet, and brought it to the position it now occupies by engaging Fanny Fern, Edward Ever- ett, Henry Ward Beecher and other eminent writers as contributors. General Adam Badeau, the author of a " History of General Grant " and numerous newspaper and magazine articles, was born in New York and resided in Westchester County. He was made captain and aide-de-camp of United States Volunteers in April, 18(52, and afterward appointed on the staff of General Sherman. He was severely wounded at Port Hudson, joined General Grant in January, 1864, as his military secretary, with the rank of lieutenant-colonel, and was made brevet brigadier-general United States army for faithful and meritorious services in the war. He became colonel and aide-de-camp to the general of the army in March, 186j, and continued to May, 1869, when he was retired. He was secretary of lega- tion to the English court at London. Rev. Wm. E. Turner, of P^lmsford, kindly furnishes the following account of the early life and literary labors of Jay Gould, the noted financier, who, while a mere lad, wrote the history of Delaware County : " Jay Gould did not in early life enjoy the advan- tages of a literary education. His only opportunities were first in a private school taught in the neighbor- hood, for the benefit of a few of the neighbors, by a young man named Oliver. He subsequently removed to the academy in Franklin, where young Gould fol- lowed him and very early finished his education. Hence it could not be said that he ever acquired much of a literary taste, but rather a business education. He did, however, write the history of Delaware County, which is still extant and certainly a very creditable performance for a youth of sixteen years of age. His education, as we have said, was more of a business character. Hence we see him, after spend- ing a little time as clerk in a country store, engaged in measuring the distances and assisting in plotting the maps of Ulster and Scoharie Counties. We should not forget to mention that his first business venture was with a mouse-trap which he had constructed and brought to the city of New York for the purpose of placing it among the curiosities and useful exhibits of the Crystal Palace. This venture seems, in some re- spects, to have been unfortunate ; for, while on his way, as he was admiring the wonders of the city, a thief stole the trap. The offender, however, was caught and on his arraignment before the Police Court it was recorded that the mouse-trap had taken larger game— it had caught a thief. "At an early age — before he was twenty — he left his native town to engage in a large business in Penn- sylvania — managing the financial affairs of a tannery, said at that time to be the largest in the country, if not in the world." Mr. Gould's life story, as told by himself before the Senate Labor Committee in New York, in September, 1883, was as follows : Having stated that he was born in Roxbury, N. Y^., on May 27, 1836, he said he as- sisted his sisters in tending the cattle and one day he said to his father he would like to go to school. The father replied that he was too young, " but," said the witness, "I was determined to secure an education, as I was then fourteen years of age. At last," said the witness, with a smile, " I fell in with a black- smith, and as I could write a good hand, I told him I could keep his books. He consented and that was the first occupation that brought me remuneration." He had a taste for mathematics; used to get up at three o'clock in the morning and study till six and in this way prepared himself for a start in life. Mr. Gould then proceeded to say that he heard of a man in Ulster County who was making a map of 63G HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. that county, and having a great taste for surveying he (the witness) went and offered his assistance. He was thereupon engaged at twenty dollars per month, but his work proved so unsatisfactory that his em- ployer told him the work he i)erformed was a silly lot of stuff. " After that," said the witness, " I had not the heart next day to ask anybody to give me a dinner." He finally went to a quiet place, where nobody could see him, and had a good cry. He then went to his sister's house, where he went up stairs and prayed, after which he felt better. After that he resolved not to go home again, but to go ahead and die in the last ditch. He returned to his task of completing the map and made similar sur- veys of Delaware and Albany Counties, from which he realized five thousand dollars, which was his first capital. After the panic of 1857 he came to New York and, owing to the depreciation of values in property, he was able to buy on credit the bonds of the Rutland and Washington Railroad for ten cents on the dollar. He took charge of the railroad and was its president, treasurer and general manager. He conducted the road until its consolidation with the Rensselaer and Saratoga road, when he was able to sell out his in- terest at a large profit. Subsequently he took a bank- rupt friend's interest in the Cleveland and Pittsburgh road and held it till he was able to sell it to advan- tage. He became a large owner of Union Pacific stock in consequence of a misunderstanding with parties interested and also owing to the illness of Mr. Horace F. Clark in Chicago. The road was then in a bad way, the stock going down to fifteen, and the only thing he could do to save himself was to hold on to what he had, while at the same time he still kept buying. He made up his mind to stick to the road and build it up, and he persevered till it at last paid dividends. Before the road became a success a great clamor arose that it was Jay Gould's road, as though that was a dangerous thing. He was then engaged in selling out his stock, which was soon in the hands of- seven thousand investors, representing the earnings of many widows and orphans. The next venture was the building up of the Gould railroad system in the South and West. It began with purchase of the Missouri and Pacific from Commo- dore Garrison. Other roads were purchased and connections were made to different points. Mr. Gould said that he had at this time passed the point where money-making was an object, and his only idea was in carrying out the system to merely see what could be done by combinations. The lines now spread through Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Mis- souri, Arkansas and Indian Territory, Texas, Louis- iana and Mexico. There _are central connections at Cincinnati, St. Louis, Chicago and New Orleans. All the construction of this system of roads was com- pleted in 1882, and represented about ten thousand miles of road. The earnings of the lines when he took jDossession of them were about seventy thousand dollars a month. The earnings for the month of August, 1883, were five million five hundred thousand dollars. In building up this system, the Southwest has been opened up and the country thrown open to civilization. Mr. Gould stated that he was a director in the Chicago and Northwest, Chicago and Rock Island, Delaware, Lackawanna and Western, New York and New England and several other smaller lines. Incidental to his railroad interests he has become largely interested in the telegraphic business. This was on account of the intimate connection between the two industries. He was instrumental in starting the American Union to make it a competing line with the Western Union. He found it would be impos- sible to accomplish this on account of the extent of the latter's connections. He then turned his attention to getting control of Western Union by buying stock when it was low. Finding it a paying investment, he had been constantly increasing his interest. His subsequent history as a .successful business man, and finally as one of the greatest magnates of Wall Street, is well known, but has little to do with the literary annals of Westchester County. Another Westchester County litterateur, Mr. Fred- erick Whittaker, is a prolific writer of stories, and widely known for his " Life of Custer." Mr. Whit- taker is the second son and fourth child of Henry Whittaker and Catharine Maitland, and was born in Sloane Street, London, on December 12, 1838. His father was a solicitor with a large practice, but was ruined by indorsing for a noble client. Lord Kensing- ton, the original of Thackeray's "Lord Crabs" in the " Ye]low])lush Papers." Mr. Whittaker was compelled to flee from England to escape imprisonment for debt. For some years he wandered from place to place with his family on the Continent, and finally, in 1850, came to this country, settling in New York, where he obtained a good practice as a lawyer, and wrote the first book on practice, under the code. "Whittaker's Practice " was a standard book until superseded by later decisions and later books. Frederick Whit- taker's education in the mean time was of a desultory character, and his attendance at school was limited to six months at a Mr. Walker's private school in Brooklyn. His father tried to make a lawyer of him, but the boy's tastes inclined to literature. At sixteen he entered the office of N. Dane Ellingwood, a law- yer, as office-boy, and two or three years later ob- tained a position in the office of Henry G. Harrison, architect. A defect in his eyesight, however, which was now discovered, put an end to his efforts to become an architect. In the mean time he had made many boyish attempts at literary composition, and finally succeeded in getting into print in a magazine, now extinct, called TJie Great Republic Monthly. When the Civil War broke out he joined a cavalry regiment, and on his return obtained employment as LITERATURE AND LITERARY MEN. 637 a book canvasser, and afterwards as a school-teacher. After repeated faihires to secure the publication of some of his writings he attracted the notice of Mayne Reid, who jiublished a little song "Starlighted Mid- night " from his pen in his (Reid's) magazine, Onward. Reid gave him some good advice, and pointed out the coui-se he should pursue in order to succeed. Mr. Whittaker's next step was the publication by Frank Leslie of some stories of adventure which he had submitted. In 1870, with some money inherited from English relatives, he was enabled to buy his present home at Mount Vernon. He also married and set to work in earnest to earn a living by his pen. This he succeeded in doing by writing serials and dime novels for Muuro, of the Fireside Companion, Beadle and others. He also contributed a set of papers to the Army and Navy Journal, called " Volunteer Cavalry ; the Lessons of the Decade." These attracted much attention, and in 1874 Mr. Whittaker became the first National Guard editor, and afterwards assistant editor of the Journal. In 1876 he left it for a time and wrote the " Life of General Custer." In the following year he returned to the Journal and also wrote a good deal for the Galaxy magazine. He also l)ublished a novel, " The Cadet Button," about this time. Since then he has been engaged in writing serials for a living, and has also written a play, "Napoleon," intended for Edwin Booth, but never acted. He compiled for this work the chapter on " Civil War" in Westchester County. Eliza W. Farnham, philanthropist and author, was born at Rensselaerville, November 17, 1815, and died in New York City, December 1-5, 1864 Her maiden- name was Burhaus. She went to Illinois in 1885, and was married there in the following year to Thomas J. Farnham. In 1841 she returned to New York, and was employed in visiting prisons and lecturing to women. In the spring of 1844 she accepted appointment as matron of the Female De- partment of the State Prison, at Sing Sing. In 1848 she was connected with the Institution for the Blind, in Boston, and from 1849 to 1856 resided in California. She returned to New York and published "Calilbrnia, in Doors and Out." She was also the author of several books, and was active iw promoting social re- forms and the rights of women. Rev. William James Cumming, author of the his- tories of the towns of Cortlandt and Yorktown in this work, and compiler of the Civil List, was born in New York City, July 22, 1847, and is the son of John Pollock Cumming and Isabella Pollock, both of Ban- gor, Ireland. He was educated at the public schools of New York City and in the College of the City of New York, where he graduated in 1867. He studied for the ministry at the Union Theological Seminary, graduating in 1S71 and was ordained August 8, 1876, since which time he has been pastor of the Presby- terian Church at Yorktown. Previous to that time, 1872-75, he taught school at Norwalk, Conn., and in New York City. His literary work has comprised a number of historical papers and newspaper articles, and lie is a member of the Westchester Historical Society and secretary of the Westchester Bible So- ciety. Mr. Charles E. Culver, author of the town histories of Somers and North Salem in this work, was born on the 6th of April, 1842, in the town of Somers, in the house now owned and occupied by James P. Teed. His father was Edward W. Culver, the son of Joshua Culver, and he was born in the house directly oppo- site Mt. Zion Church. The Culver family are of Welsh descent. Charles E. Culver's mother was Sarah J., daughter of Samuel Teed. She was born in the Teed homestead, now the residence of her brother, James P. Teed. The Teed family are of French ex- traction. His parents removed to New York City when he was a child, and among the earliest of his recollections is the attendance at a private school in Amos, (now West Tenth) Street. Owing to continued ill health in childhood and by advice of a physician, his father disposed of his business in the city, and re- moved to North Salem on a farm. Charles then at- tended the preparatory department of the North Salem Academy. John F. Jenkins, A.M., was the principal, his daughter. Miss Mary Jenkins, having charge of the preparatory department. The family then removed to Whitlockville, (now Katonah,) and Charles attended the private school of Mrs. Miller and Miss Mitchell, near that place. He continued his studies, after the close of the latter school, at the public school and under tutors. In 18()() he began the study of dentistry in New York, intending to complete the course at the Baltimore Dental College, but the approach of the war and excitement of the times turned his attention to other than civil pur- suits. In 1861-62—63 he was engaged in various government employments, both under the State and nation. He was married in New York City in 1863, and removed to West Farms, where he carried on the manufacture of writing ink. In 1864 he removed to Northern Illinois and remained West ten years, being a resident of Chicago during the memorable fire of 1871, where his publishing business, as well as his home and everything he possessed, including a fine library, were completely destroyed, his family and himself escaping with but the clothing they wore. In 1869 he started the publication of the Chicago Dis- patch, a weekly Sunday paper, under the firm-name of Culver, Harris & Wilson. Charles E. Harris (Carl Pretzel) is now the publisher of PretzeFs Weekly. Col. T. B. Wilson was from Alabama, and had charge of the Masonic department of the paper. After the firm had sold out the publication, Mr. Culver became connected with the daily press of Chicago, having began to wTite for the press when a mere lad. His first real newspaper work was done for the late Horace Greeley about 1861, since which time he has been more or less actively engaged as correspondent or in 638 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. an editorial capacity. He has had two children, both now deceased. In politics he is a Democrat. Rev. David Cole, D.D., of Yonkers, who has con- tributed so much towards this history of Westchester County, has furnished us with the following interest" ing sketch of a few of the authors and writers in hi'' locality : Pastors, editors and newspaper correspondents have> of course, in Yonkers, as in other places, written volu- minously. We have already spoken of all editors and conductors of papers who live in the city, and will not bring them in here. But, among paper cor- respondents, many facile Yonkers pens, driven both by ladies and gentlemen among us, have been driven to purpose upon articles that have appeared in our own and in outside papers and periodicals. We can- not mention these, but confine ourselves, in the fol- lowing catalogue, to writers who have published pam- phlets or books. Lyman Cobb, Sr-, born in Massachusetts in 1800, and one of the greatest educators and most indefati- gable authors of his time, spent the last five years of his life in Yonkers. Mr. Cobb began teaching at sixteen, and published his famous " Cobb's Spelling- Book " at nineteen years of age. This book went into all the schools of the country. His subsequently published books were very numerous. They included five reading-books, a speaker, a dictionary, an expos- itor, a miniature lexicon and extended to many other volumes. At his death he left unfinished a concord- ance, a national dictionary and a pronouncing Testa- ment. Mr. Cobb was as active in humane enterprises as he was in educational and literary work. He was a member of each of many benevolent societies of prominence, and a leader in them all. He was noted for intelligent zeal, for promptness in action, for kind- ness of heart and for simplicity of conduct. His death occurred on October 26, 1864, and he left in Yonkers four children, two of whom are prominent in Yonkers business life, and have both been men- tioned in their places in this work. J. Henry Pooley, M.D., who has been spoken of among the Yonkers physicians, was, during his long residence and practice in Yonkers, a frequent writer of pamphlets and fugitive articles upon professional subjects, some of which at least attracted wide notice. These were his diversions. He did not make writ- ing a profession. Several leading business men of Yonkers have done more or less amateur writing, now and then throwing their productions into pamphlet form. Among these, one is Mr. Robert P. Getty, whose overflowing.life has made itself felt in so many and such various direc- tions. Mr. Getty's home delight has been in his library, within the walls of which he has collected and systematically filed newspapers and other regis- ters of passing events, with which he has kept up familiarity to such a remarkable degree that he is al- most an encyclopaedia of the history of New York and its vicinity. He has grappled with history, with science and with social, political and financial econ- omy, and has written considerably on them all, and many articles he has printed. One little waif of his, in doggerel verse, will keep his memory alive. It is entitled, " Chi-onicles of Yonkers." It was published in 1864 without name, and thrown upon the tables of a fair held in the interest of the New York Sanitary Commission, to be sold for the benefit of the fair. It is sprightly and pungent, full of caustic allusionsto the early history of Yonkers, as well as hits at the living men and the usages of the place at the time in which it was written. But, most of all, it helps to reveal the mind and vivacity of the writer, who has himself been one of the institutions of Yonkers since 1849. Hon. G. Hilton Scribner, who came to Yonkers about twenty years ago as a practicing lawyer, and who, from 1871 to 1873, was Secretary of State, has now long confined himself to the management of a New York City railroad. He is, however, another of the amateur writers of Yonkers. His most not- able production is a monograph, published about two years ago, entitled " Where did Life Begin ? " It has attracted wide attention for its subject, for the way in which the subject is treated, and from the fact that several minds on both sides of the Atlantic seem al- most simultaneously to have set forth its theory, which is, that all life of all varieties began at the poles. Mr. Scribner does not make writing a pursuit, but writes in a neat, self-controlled and pleasant style, which always insures respectful attention for what- ever he prints. Foremost among the writers of Yonkers is the Rev. Henry Martyn Baird, Ph.D., D.D., LL.D., an accomplished linguist, and one of the best read and mo.st scholarly of men. He has been professor of Greek in the University of the City of New York since 1859. His writings have been numerous. A list of them may easily be obtained. It is enough here to cite his last and greatest work, entitled " Rise of the Huguenots of France," published in two vol- umes in 1879. Dr. Baird was widely known before, but this masterly work gave him a greatly increased reputation. Its style is a model, it thrills with in- terest, its grasp is profound, and altogether it is a masterpiece. The notices of it by foreign as well as home journals, while independent and in many cases ably critical, have been most flattering, and some have not hesitated to rank the work with the great histories of Prescott and Motley. Dr. Baird is still prosecuting his researches into his great subject, and further volumes, we understand, may be expected in due time. Dr. Dio Lewis, the author and teacher of physical culture, died at his residence in Yonkers, in 1886, from erysii)elas. A couple of weeks before his death he fell from his horse and received an injury to his left leg, below the knee. On Wednesday following he came to New York, and in returning home was CIVIL HISTORY. 639 carried past Yonkers to Hastings. He walked home, a distance of about four miles. The exertion proved too much for his injured log, causing erysipelas to set in. Dr. Lewis was a native of Auburn, N. Y., and was sixty-three years old. He studied medicine in the Harvard Medical School, and began the practice of his profession in Auburn in 1845, at the age of twenty-two. Two years later he removed to Buffalo, where he practiced five years, and wrote and pub- lished a number of papers on the causes and treat- ment of cholera, which ravaged that city in 1849 and 1851. Dr. Lewis during those years of practice be- came impressed with the necessity of physical culture to prevent disease, and in 1855 he gave up the prac- tice of his profession, and began a course of lecturing and writing on the subject of public and personal hygiene. During four years he lectured almost every night, giving his days to the invention of his new system of gymnastics. In 18(j0, having j)erfected this system, he aban- doned the platform and settled in Boston, where he established his normal school for physical training. He was assisted in teaching by the cele- brated Dr. Walter Channing, Dr. Thomas Hoskins and other well-known medical scholars, and within seven years more than four hundred persons had been graduated from his normal school, and were spreading the principles of his system of physical training throughout the land. He next established a seminary for girls in Lexington, Mass., his object being to illus- trate the possibilities in the physical development of girls'during their school-life. This seminary rapidly became popular, and attracted pupils from all parts of the country and even from Central America and the West Indies. Dr. Lewis remained in Boston until 1882, when he removed to Yonkers and established a maga- zine in Xew York devoted to sanitary and social science, and known as IHo Lewis' Monthbj. Dr. Lewis published a number of books on physical culture which had a wide circulation, the most promi- nent of them being "Our Girls," "Our Digestion" and " Weak Lungs." Besides the authors mentioned, the celebrated nov- elist Mrs. E. D. E. N. Southworth has been a resident of Yonkers since 1876. She was born in Washing- ton, D. C, December 26, 1819, her parents being Charles Le Compte Nevitte, a merchant of Alexan- dria, Va., and Susannah George Wailes Nevitte, of St. Mary's, Md. She married Frederick H. South- worth, of Utica, N. Y., in 1840. Her first story was written in the latter part of 1846, and published in the Baltimore Saturday Visitor of that year. From 1847 to 1857 all her writings were issued in the Wash- ington National Era. Her first novel in book-form was published by the Harpers of New York, in 1849, after having been run through tl;e Era. From 1857 she has been writing for the Nev York Ledger. Since the latter year she has published through the New York Ledger only. She is at present (Decem- ber, 1885) writing her sixty-seventh novel. Her works have been republished in P^ngland, and trans- lated into German, French and Spanish. Mrs. South- worth is a lady of refinement, of great intelligence and extensive reading, esjiecially familiar with all the characters and phases of Washington life, and a most interesting conversationalist. She is so devoted to her work as to be seldom seen in public. She is under- stood to be an admirer and perhaps a disciple of Swedenborg. Her disposition is one of great amia- bility, and she is noted for her practical sympathy with and ready hand for all who are in trial and need. It would not be possible to give the names of all Yonkers men and women who have simply published pamphlets or been active in newspaper correspond- ence. Among the latter have been several Yonkers ladies, some of whom have been professional paper and magazine contributors, writing under assumed names. We have tried to recall at least all writers of books, and hope that to this extent our effort has been a success. CHAPTER XIV. CIVIL HISTORY. BY REV. WILLIAM J. CUMMING, Of Yorktown. October 3, 1642, John Throgmorton (or Throck- morton) and some friends, who had suffered in the persecution against Roger Williams, obtained permis- sion of the authorities of the New Netherlands to settle thirty-five families in what is now the town of Westchester, and doubtless the settlement was made shortly after this date. This territory had been pur- chased of the Indians in 1640, and bore the name Vredeland — land of peace. ' This grant was con- firmed by William Kieft, director-general, July 6, 1643. John (or Jan) Throckmorton was to receive the land in fee-simple and to be allowed the free ex- ercise of religion, on condition that he, his associates and successors should " acknowledge as their lords and patroons" the Dutch authorities. This grant really made John Throckmorton the patroon of the portion of Vredeland granted to him. The settle- ment was designated by the Dutch Oostdorp and by the English Easttown. This is the first civil division in what is now Westchester County, ^ in which, doubt- ■O'Callaghan'e "Historj' of the New Netherlaods," vol. ii. p. 312. 2 See " History of Town of Westchester," below. 640 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. less, English ideas and government, subject to the supremacy of the Dutch, prevailed, August 3, 1639, the Dutch purchased a large tract of land on the Hudson, north of Manhattan Island, from the Indians. In 1646, Adriaen van der Donck received a grant of this tract, called Nepperhaem, where Yonkers now stands, from the Dutch. ' This grant was made under the " Charter of Privileges and Exemptions," issued June 7, 1629, " which provided that any member of the company who should pur- chase of the Indians, and found in any part of New Netherland (except Manhattan) a colonic of fifty persons over fifteen years of age, should be in all re- spects the feudal lord and patroon of the territory of which he should thus take possession." ^ This colony bears the name of Colen Donck. Here we have the second civil division. In 1655, Thomas Pell, of Fairfield, Conn., laid claim to Vredeland under color of an Indian conveyance of November 14, 1654, and called it Westchester. Settlement took place shortly after by the English from New England. April 2, 1655, the Dutch or- dered them off. March 6, 1656, an order was issued by the director-general and Council for the arrest of the English intruders. A force, sent for the purpose, arrested twenty-three persons and brought them to New Amsterdam. On the 16th the prisoners offered to submit to the Dutch authority. Their offer was ac- cepted. They requested the privilege of choosing their own officers and of making and administering their own laws. They were granted the same privi- leges as the freemen of the villages of Middleborough, Brenkelen, Midwout and Amersfoort. They were allowed to nominate double the number of persons, from whom the executive would make selections. These officers were called "Schepens."^ * The civil designation originally given to Throckmorton's set- tlement Oostdorp or Easitown, was continued. " In the municipal government of these settlements two systems, es- sentially different ill principle obtained. In the 'Colonies ' the superin- tending power was lodged in one individuiil, who, though the immediate vassal of the sovereign authority from which he| derived his lauds, was himself lord paramount in his manor, where he not only represented the sovereign, but exercised feudal jurisdiction over his colonists, who stood towards him in the same relation ho occupied towards tlie supreme head of the State. ... In return for this obedience the patroon was bound to protect the colonists, who had the ailditioual right to address themselves by appeal to the supreme authority at Amsterdam, in case they were either aggrieved or oppressed. . . . "Towns or communes sometimes acquired independence of these feudal lords, and held their privileges directly from the crown. They were incorporated and held land in fee, and possessed the rights of patroons. They named persons from whom the executive selected offi- cers called ' schepens. ' These constituted a board of conmiunication with their sovereign head, were a local court of justice, and had a sellout or sheriff, a secretary and a marshal. Their official term was one year. One hundred years before the Dutch settlement there were in Holland 1 O'Callaghan's '■ History of the New Netherlanile," vol. ii. p. 382. 2 Civil List of State of Xew York, 1880, p. 57. » O'Callaghan's "Hist, of S. H." < O'Callaghan's " History of X. H.," pp. 312-313. ' There is among the records of the town of Westchester one entitled ' The Book of Courts Acts from 16.57 to ViGl. ' 300 such municipalities. Both ideas came with the people and were found here. " Strange as it may seem, while every colonie, and almost every ham- let, had its local magistracy, the citizens of New Amsterdam [New York City], the capital of the whole province, continued, greatly to their dis- content, without a voice in the management of their municipal affairs. The government of the city still remained in the hands of the Director- General and his council." ' Colendonck, (Yonkers) was under the government of a patroon, such as is described above ; and the fol- lowing statement gives some idea of the " Charter of Privileges and Exemptions" issued by the West India Company's College of Nineteen, June 7, 1629, in accordance with which the grant was made tO' Van der Donck : "The Patroon had power to appoint officers and magistrates in all' towns and cities on his lands ; to hold manorial courts, from which, in cases where the judgment exceeded fifty guilders, the only appeal was to the Director-General and Council ; in short, to hold and govern liis great manor with as absolute a rule as any baron of the Middle Ages. The power of the Patroons over their tenants was almost unlimited. No man or woman, son or daughter, man-servant or maid-servant could leave a Patroon's service during the time they had agreed to remain, except by his written consent, no matter what abuses or breaches of con- tract existed on part of the Patroon. This charter prescribed regula- tions and granted privileges with regard to trade, gave to the freemen all the land they could cultivate, and exempted them from taxation for ten years. Churches and schools were required to be established, and the manufacture of cloths was prohibited. The company retained the fur trade and fettered commerce. Several directors of the company availed themselves of the advantages offered. The Patroon of Bens- selaerswyck, however, was the only one who established a manorial court, and he rendered the privilege of appeal nugatory by exacting of his tenants, as a condition to the occupation of land, that they would not avail themselves of it. This monopoly had a disastrous effect upon the colony. Differences arose between the company and the Patroons, and a new policy wa.'^, therefore, inaugurated. In 1638 free emigration was encouraged, and in 164<) (.luly 19) the College of Nineteen passed an or- dinance materially modifying the Charter of Privileges and Exemptions. The policy of free emigration, free lands and free trade, incomplete as it was, increased at once the prosperity of the colony." ' In what is now Westchester County we have, there- fore, both systems — in Colendonck the government of a patroon or feudal baron, in Oostdorf the commune or town, with some local autonomy. The New Netherlands were governed by the ''Dutch Roman [or Civil] Law, the imperial statutes of Charles v., and the edicts, customs and resolutions of the United Netherlands'* and such ordiuances as the Dutch West India Company should prescribe. The boundary between the New England colonies and the New Netherlands had been in dispute. By the treaty of 1650 Greenwich on the main land and Oyster Bay on Long Island became the eastern limits of the latter. ' November 15, 1663, Westchester was ceded by Stuyvesant to Connecticut, and English law and customs prevailed. Less than a year later, Sep- tember 8, 1664, the New Netherlands surrendered to an English squadron under Richard Nicolls. The New Netherlands became New York, the Dutch West India Company w&re succeeded by the Duke of York (to whom his brother, Charles II., " by the most des- 6 O'Callaghan's " Histoiy of N. N.," pp. 391-393. ' Civil List of State of N. Y., 1880, pp. 57-.58. 9 Civil List of state of N. Y., 1880, p. 23. 3 Bancroft's "Hist, of U.S." (last edition), vol. i. p. 508. CIVIL HISTOKY. 641 potic instrument recorded in the colonial archives of England," which ignored alike English charters and Dutch claims),' and the civil law gave place to the common law. With the exception of a brief period of Dutch occupation in 1673 to 1674, English rule re- mained until the Revolution. Anglo-Saxon ideas and customs still predominate. Richard Nicolls took Stuyvesant's place, and found it profitable employ- ment, for the fees received, to issue new patents to the old settlers. The Duke of York, whose deputy the Governor was, promised more privileges than he ever gave. County under English Rule. — Changes in the proprietors and systems brought with them local changes. Colendonck (Yonkers), the second civil divi- sion of what is now called Westchester County, had been blotted from the map by the massacre of its in- habitants by the Algonquin Indians in September, 1655.- Nothing remained but the charter. In 1664, only Westchester, formerly called by the Dutch Oost- dorp, or Easttown, remained. "A convention of two delegates from each town on Long Island' was held at Hempstead in February, 1665, for the purpose of receiving from the Governor the code which he had prepared, and which was called ' the Duke's Laws.' The code was chiefly compiled from laws then in force in New England, 'with an abatement of the severity against such as differ in matters of conscience and religion.' The only popular feature of the code was the one organizing the town courts. It provided for the election, by a majority of the freeholders of each town, of eight overseers, to try minor causes, and adopt local ordinances, subject to the approval of the Court of Assize. Four were to retire each year, and from them a constable was to be elected on the 1st or 2d of April, to act with the overseers, his election being subject to confirmation by the justice, in whose hands the local administration was really vested. Long Island, Stateu Island and parts of West- chester were united in a shrievalty called Y'orkshire, and divided into three districts, called ridings. The English system of sheriff's courts was introduced. Ttie Governor and the Council appointed each year a sheriff for the whole of Yorkshire, and three justices of the peace for each riding, who were to continue in office during the Governors pleasure, and were to hold a Court of Sessions in each riding three times a year, in which the Governor or any of his councilors might preside. Besides their local duties, the high sheriff" and justices were to sit with the Governor and his Council in the Supreme Court of the Province, called the Court of Assize, which was to meet at New Y'ork once a year, on the last Thursday in September. This court was also a legislative body, as it was invested with ' the supreme power of making, altering and abolish- > Bancroft's " History of the U. S.,"' vol. i. p. 518 (last edition). Ibid. 'This ii a mistake; Westchester was repreeeDted by Edward Jeesup and John Qiiinby. 60-61 ing any laws,' except customs laws, in which it could only recommend changes. Town officers were required to make assessments annually, and taxes were levied through the Courts of Sessions, which made requisi- tions upon the town authorities. The delegates to the convention asked for power to choose their local magis- trates. This was denied, the Governor exhibiting his instructions from the Duke of York, 'wherein the choice of all the officers of justice was solely to be made by the Governor.'" * From 1665 to 1683 the inhabited portion this county formed, with Staten Island, Kings County and Newtown, the West Riding of Yorkshire. Westchester County, with substantially the same boundaries as at present, was erected, November 1, 1683, by the following act of the General Assembly, assented to by the Governor and Council : "An Act to divide the Province of New York and dependencies into shiret and counties^ et:. " Having taken into consideration the necessity of dividing the Prov- ince into respective countys, for the better governing and settling courts in the same, be it enacted by the Governor. Council and the Represen- tatives, and by the authority of the same, that the said Province be di- vided into twelve countys as foUoneth . The County of Westchester to conteyne. West and Eastcliester, Bronx-land, Fordham, Anne Hook's Neck, Richbell's, Miuiford's Islands, and all the land on the uiaine to the eastward of Manhattan's Island, as farre as the government extends, and the Yonker's land, and northward along Hudson's Kiver as fane as the Highland. . . . "The bill having been three times read before the governor and Council, is assented to the first of November, 1683."' This act is confirmed by one passed October 1, 1691 (3d William and Mary). The dividing line between this State and Connecti- cut was in dispute. As this was a border county, it was involved. Prior to the taking of the New Neth- erlands by the English a controversy was going on between the Dutch and colony of Connecticut. This was inevitable from the fact that the charters came from different nations. There could have been but one outcome — the Dutch were obliged to yield and the inhabitants of Connecticut would have pushed their settlements to the Hudson River. The charters granted by the English did not settle matters. The Duke of York's domain extended to the Con- necticut River, that of Connecticut to the "South Sea." The determination of the boundary line settled the civil status of Bedford and Rye. Both colonies ac- knowledging one supreme authority an amicable ad- justment was possible. Commissioners were sent over for the purpose in 1664. The line decided upon was to be twenty miles east of the Hudson River and was located at the Mamaroneck River. The towns named above fell to our neighbor. The matter was reopened in 1683 and the dividing line placed by agreement at Byram River. Bedford and Rye became a part of ■•Civil List of State of New York, 1880, pp. 45 and 46. Provincial Laws of X. Y., Co. Clerk's Office, Queen's Co., L. I., as quoted by Bolton — " History of West Co.," vol. i. pp. 7 and 8 (new edi- tion). 642 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. New York. The King died before this settlement re- ceived his approval, and the subject was an open one once more. March 29, 1700, William III. approved of the agreement of 1683. The line was not finally established until May 14, 1731, by which the " Ob- long," a tract of sixty-one thousand four hundred and forty acres, extending as far north as the Massa- chusetts line, was ceded to New York, in compensa- tion for loss of territory along the Sound, in addition to the towns named above. That portion of the " Ob- long " which belongs to this county was erected into the town of Salem (now Lewisboro). By an act enti- tled " An Act to ascertain Part of the Southern and Western Boundaries of the County of Westchester and Eastern Boundaries of the County of Orange and Part of the Northern Bounds of Queens County," passed December 31, 1768 (9th George III.), the wa- ter boundaries were given more definitely. Courts. — By the act of 1683, Westchester was made the county-town, and the courts there estab- lished. From the report to the Committee on Trade on province of New York, of February 22, 1687, made by Governor Dongan, who had summoned the General Assembly of 1683, we gain some idea of the courts established by the act referred to, — Courts of Justice are uow established by Act of Assembly, and they are : " 1. The Court of Chancery, consisting of Governor and Council, is the Supreme Court of this province, to which appeals may be brought from any other court. " 2. The Assembly finding the inconvenience of bringing y« ]ieace, sheriffs, constables @ other persons concerned from the remote parts of this government to 'New York, did, instead of the Court of Assizes which was yearly held for the whole Government of this province, erect a Court of Oyer and Terminer, to be held once every year within each county, for the determining of such matters asshould arise within them respect- ively, the members of which court were appointed to be one of the two judges of this province, assisted by three justices of the peace of that wherein such court is held, which Court of Oyer and Terminer has like- wise power to hear appeals from any inferior Court. " 4. There is likewise in every county, twice in every year (except in New York, where its four times, (a' in Albany, where its thrice), Courts of Sessions held by the Justices of the Peace for the respective counties, as in England. "5. In every town within y Government there are 3 Commissioners appointed to hear and determine all matters of dif!erence not exceeding the value of £.3, which shall happen in the respective towns," 1 By the act of General Assembly })assed May 6, 1691, and ordinance of 1(599, several changes were made in the judicial system of the iirovince. A Supreme Court was established, the Court of Oyer and Termi- ner as a distinct court was abolished, and its jurisdic- tion vested in the Supreme Court, which retained also the name for its criminal circuit, the functions of the Court of Sessions were confined to criminal matters, and a Court of Common Pleas, erected for each coun- ty, with cognizance of all actions, real, personal and jnixed, where the value exceeded five pounds. From the civil list of the province of New York for 1693^ we learn something of civil affairs in this county, — " Justices in Westchester County : Caleb Heathcote, Esqr., Judge of Common Pleas ; Joseph Theall, Wm. Barnes, Daniel Strange, James Mott, John Hunt, Thomas Chadderton, ThomasPinckney, Esqrs.; Benj. Collier, Sheriff ; Joseph Lee, Clerk of County ; Collectors, Assessors and Constables elective. An account of all Eslabliskmenls of Jurisdiction Within this Province. Singh Justice. — Every Justice of the Peace hath power to determine any suite or controversy to the value of 40s. " Quarter Sessions. — The Justices of the Peace in Quarter Sessions have all such powers and authorities as are granted in a commission of y' Peace in England. '• Count// Court. — The County Court or Common Pleas hath cognizance of Civil Accons to any value, excepting what concerns title of land and noe Accon can be removed from this court, if the damage be under €20. " Sujireme Court. — The Supreme Court hath powers of King's Bench, Common Pleas & Exchequer in England and noe Acc6n can be removed from this court if under £100. "Chancery. — The Governor & Council are a Court of Chancery and have powers of the chancery in England, from whose sentence or decree nothing can be removed under £300. " Prerogative Court. — The Governor discharges the place of Ordinary in granting administracOns and proveing Wills, etc. The Secretary is Register. The Governor is about to appoint Delegates in the remoter parts of the Government, with supervisors for looking after intestate's estates and provideing for orphans." Minor criminal offenses were looked after by the Court of Sessions, and the more flagrant by the judges of the Supreme Court in their circuits through the counties. They had for this purpose "a commission of oyer and terminer and general jail delivery, in which some of the county judges were joined."'^ Smith, in his " History of New York," gives us an interesting account of the courts as they were in 1757,— "Justices of the peace are appointed by commission from the Govern- ors, who, to serve their purposes in elections, sometimes grant, as it is called, the administration to particular favorites in each county, which is the nomination of officers civil and military ; and by these means jus- tices have been astcmisliingly multiplied. There are instances of some of these who can neither write nor read. These Genii, besides their ordi- nary powers, are by acts of assembly enabled to hold courts for the de- termination of small causes of 5 pounds and under ; but the parties are privileged, if they choose it, with a jury ; the proceedings are in a sum- mary way, and the conduct of the justices has given just cause to innu- merable complaints. The justices have also jurisdiction with crimes under the degree of grand larceny ; for any three of them (one being of the quorum) may try the criminal without a jury, and inflict punish ments not extending to life or limb. " The Sessions and Court of Common Pleat. — The Court of Common Pleas takes cognizance of all causes where the matter in demand is in value above 5 ponmls. It is established by ordinance of the Governor in Council. The judges are ordinarily three, and hold their offices during pleasure. Thro' the infancy of the country, few, if any of them, are acquainted with the law. The practice of these courts is similar to that of the common bench at Westminster. They have each a clerk, conunis- sioned by the Governor, who issues their writs, enters their minutes and keeps the records of the country. They are held twice every year. These judges, together with some of the justices, hold at the same time a court of general sessions of the peace. . . . " Sujjreme Court. — The judges of this court, according to the act of Assembly, are judges of the Nisi Prius^ of course, and agreeably to an or- dinance of the Governor and Co\incil, perform a circuit thro' the counties once every year. They carry with them at the same time, a commission of oyer and terminer and general jail delivery, in which some of the county justices are joined. The.v have but two clerks — one attendant upon the Supreme Court at New York and the other on the circuits." * From these accounts and other sources we gain some idea of the judicial system of the county during 1 O'Callaghau's "Doc. History of N. Y.," vol. i. pp. 147 and 148. -' O'Callaghau's " Doc. History of N. Y.,'' vol. i. pp. ai.'i and 319. s Civil List, 1880, p. 209. '•Smith's "History of N. Y.," vol. i. pp. 3i;0-377. CIVIL colonial times. Under the Duke's Laws there ex- isted a Court of Sessions with both civil and criminal jurisdiction, held three times a year by the resident justices of the peace and the Town Court, held by the constable and at least five overseers of town. The latter court had both legislative and judicial func- tions, while the former exercised some of the func- tions of the supervisors.' From 1C83 to 1G91 we have the Court of Oyer and Terminer, with civil, criminal and appellate jurisdiction, held by one judge and three resident justices of the peace ; a Court of Sessions, with civil and criminal jurisdiction and power to audit and levy tlie county and town charg»^s, held twice each year ; and a Town Court, held by three commissioners. From 1691 to 1776 there were Cir- cuit Courts held annually by one of the Supreme Court justices, who had a commission of Oyer and Terminer, in which some of the county judges were associated ; the Court of Common Pleas, composed of one judge and two or more justices of the peace, which took cognizance of all actions, real, personal and mixed, where the matter in demand exceeded the sum of five pounds in value ; the Court of Sessions, whose jurisdiction was now confined to criminal cases ; the Justice's Court in the various towns. The people had comparatively little voice in their own government. The judges of the various courts, jus- tices of peace, sheriff, county clerk, surrogate, and, in fact, all officers, except the town officers (supervis- ors, collectors, assessors and constables), were ap- pointed by the Governor, who was responsible only to the King. Most of the officers thus appointed held office during the pleasure of the Governor. This con- dition of affairs produced dissatisfaction among the people, and led to an almost perpetual conflict be- tween the Government and the General Assembly. The elective officers were the overseers, supervisors, collectors, assessors and constables of the town, the mayor, aldermen and Common Council of the town or borough of Westchester,- ( which had a special charter) and representatives in the General Assembly. CorxTY uxDER THE CONSTITUTION. — When New York ceased to be a colony of England and became an independent State, great and radical changes in principle were made, yet the machinery of govern- ment was but little changed. The source of authority was changed, not its expression. The Constitution of 1777 substituted for a Governor appointed by the King one elected by the people ; the Council ap- pointed by the King or Governor became a Senate, elected by the people ; and the General Assembly elected by the people remained. The apportionment in both branches of the Legislature \vi\s according to population, — a principle not previously recognized. The number of elective officers remained the same, but the appointing pow»r was vested in the Council of • See Supervisors, below. 2 See Histori' of Town of Westchester. HISTORY. 643 Appointment, presided over by the Governor, who had a casting vote, consisting of one Senator elected annually by the Assembly from each of the four sena- torial districts. A Governor and Council holding office at the pleasure of the King gave place to a Governor and a Council elected by the people for a limited term, and thus became directly amenable to them. The elective franchise in principle remained the same, with the single exception that there was no discrimination on account of religion. The property qualification was still retained. The judicial system remained largely the same. The common and statute law of Great Britain and the acts of Colonial General Assembly, except so far as they conflicted with the new order of things, were made the law of the State until modified by the Legislature. The radical change was in the constitution of the court of final resort. Under the colonial system the Gov- ernor and Council were the court for the correc- tion of errors and appeals, from whom appeals, where the value exceeded five hundred pounds, or where the Episcopal Church was involved, lay to the King in Privy Council. Under the first constitution the executive had no judicial functions; the court of final resort was called the Court for the Trial of Impeachments and the Correction of Errors, consisting of the Lieutenant-Governor, Senate, chancellor and judges of the Supreme Court. One other important change was made. In England the granting of pro- bates was a royal prerogative and in the colony was vested in the King's representative, the Governor. The Governor of the State was stripped of this au- thority, which was granted to the surrogates of the counties and the Court of Probate. With these ex- ceptions, the colonial courts were recognized, and we have the Court of Chancery with equity powers, the Supreme Court, Court of Common Pleas, Court of Sessions and the Justices' Courts. Their powers re- mained substantially the same. The Supreme Court judges held Circuit Courts and Courts of Oyer and Terminer in each of the counties. In the latter, two or more judges of the Common Pleas were associated. The Constitution of 1821 extended the elective franchise by virtually removing the property qualifi- cation, except in the case of colored persons, who were to be freeholders of two hundred and fifty dol- lars and tax-payers. The appointing power was vested in the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate. The offices of sheriff and county clerk became elective (term of service three years). The justices of the peace were to be appointed by the supervisors and judges of the County Court. The courts in name remained the same, but the constitution of the Supreme Court was somewhat changed and a Circuit Court was added. "The Supreme Court sat four times a year in review of their decisions and for the determination of questions of law. Each justice was empowered to hold circuit courts and any justice of the Supreme Court could 644 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. likewise preside at the Oyer and Terminer." ' ^ The Constitution provided that the State should be divided into not less than four nor more than eight circuits-' Each district had its circuit judge, who possessed the powers of a justice of the Supreme Court at chambers, in the trial of issues joined in the Supreme Court, and in the Court of Oyer and Ter- miner. The Courts of Common Pleas and Sessions and Justices' Court were continued. Prior to the adoption of this Constitution most offices were held either during good behavior or at the pleasure of the appointing power. The judges of the Court of Common Pleas were appointed for the term of five years, and the surrogates for four years. In 1823 the Court of Probates disappears, and appeals from the surrogates lay to the chancellor. The justices of the peace became elective in 1826. The Constitution of 1846 extended the franchise to every resident white male citizen who was twenty- one years of age. The XV. Amendment to the Con- stitution of the United States erased the word white. All judicial offices of the State, all county offices and almost all civil offices in the gift of the State became elective. The Court for the Final Im- peachment and the Correction of Errors disappears. A new Court of Appeals is established, the constitution of which was somewhat modified by the amendment of 1866. A new Supreme Court was erected, vested with the powers hitherto possessed by the Supreme Court, the Court of Chancery and the Circuit Court. The County Court takes the place of the Common Pleas and the county judge, with two justices of the peace, holds the Court of Sessions. The jurisdiction of the former was much greater than its predecessor. This county forms part of the Second Judicial Dis- trict. At the present time the Supreme Court holds four terms and the County Court five each year at the court-house, White Plains. County-Seat. — By an act of General Assembly en- titled " An Act for the more orderly hearing and deter- mining matters of controversy, " etc., passed October 29, 1683, it was directed that Courts of Session for West- chester County should be held on the first Tuesdays of June and December, one to be held at Westchester and the other at East Chester. On the first Wednes- day of December a Court of Oyer and Terminer and General Jail Delivery was to be held. Westchester remained the shire or county-town until November 6, 1759, when the last session of the Court of Common Pleas was held there. * The New York Post-Boy of February 13, 1758, contained the following item : " New York, Februarv 13th. — We hear from AVest- chester that on Saturday the 4thinst., the court-house at that place was unfortunately burnt to the ground, 1 Civil List, 1880, pp. 211 and 212. - It seemed to have had same powers as general term of present Su- preme Court. 3 Westchester County was in the Second Circuit. * See records of Court of Common Pleas. We have not heard how it happened." ^ The destruc- tion of the court-house on February 4, 1758, and the felt necessity for a more central location for the coun- ty town, led to the passing of the following act on December 16, 1758 : " An Act to impower the Justices of the Peace and Aldermen of the Borough of Westchester, in conjunction with the Supervisors of the said County, to ascertain and fix the place for erecting a new Court-House and Gaol for the said County ; and for raising a sum not exceeding One thousand Pounds, on the Estates, real and personal, of all the Freeholders and Inhabitants of the said County, for and towards erecting the said Court- House and Gaol." White Plains was selected as the place, and on November 7, 1759, the Court of Common Pleas held its first session in the court-house.* The act of February 6, 1778, directed the supervisors to meet in the court-house. In July, 1776, the Provin- cial Convention met in it. November 5, 1776, the building was burned by some of the American troops, the records having previously been removed to a safe place. During the Revolutionary War the courts were held in the Presbyterian Church at Bedford until its destruction by the British, in 1779. From this time until November, 1884, they were held at the meeting-house in Upper Salem. The act of April 11, 1785, ordered them to be held in the Presbyterian meeting-house at Bedford until the court-house should be rebuilt or until further orders of the Legislature. The act of May 1, 1786, directed the erection of court- houses at both White Plains and Bedford and eigh- teen hundred pounds was appropriated for the purpose. Stephen Ward, Ebenezer Lockwood, Jonathan G. Tompkins, Ebenezer Purdy, Thomas Thomas, Richard Hatfield and Richard Sacket, Jr., superintended their construction. The first session of the County Court was held in Bedford court-house January 28, 1788, and that at White Plains on May 26th following. The courts were held alternately at these places untill870, when, by chapter five hundred and fifty by the laws of 1870, it was directed that they be hereafter held in the new court-house at the latter. The present county buildings were erected in 1856-57, under the superin- tendence of a committee appointed by the Board of Supervisors, consisting of Abraham Hatfield, States Barton, William Marshall, Jr., Daniel Hunt and George G. Finch, at a cost of one hundred and twenty thousand dollars. ' Elections. — During the colonial period elections were held on the first Tuesday of April in each of the towns for choosing of town officers, and as often as writs of election directed to the high sheriff" were issued for the purpose of selecting members of the Colonial Assembly. The places where the latter were 6 Bolton's "History of Westchester County," vol. ii. p. 299 (new edition). « Court-house cost £2000. Additional appropriations were made in 17fiO and 1762. ' Proceedings of Board of Supervisors, 1873, p. 714. CIVIL HISTORY. 645 held were within the bounds of the civil divisions represented. Tlie representative for the countj' was elected at first in the southern part of the county, and later near the Presbyterian meeting-house at White Plains.' The voting in all cases was viva voce. The Constitution of 1777 made provision for a trial of voting by ballot. The act of March 27, 1778, au- thorized the use of the ballot in the election of Gov- ernor and Lieutenant-Governor, and that of February 13, 1787, extended it to the election of members of the Legislature. Doubtless up to the passage of the latter act elections were carried on in much the same manner as they had been during colonial times. The act last mentioned provided that they should be held in every borough, town, district, precinct or ward under the supervision of inspectors chosen for that purpose. Until after the passage of the act of March 27, 1799, the canvassers were a joint committee of the Legislature, the boxes containing the ballots being sent by the sheriff to the Secretary of State for the purpose. After that date there were local canvassers. The result was recorded by the town clerk, who made return to the county clerk, who made record and transmitted it to the Secretary of State, who, with the comptroller and treasurer, constituted a State Board of Canvassers. The act of April 17, 1822, instituted a County Board of Canvassers, consisting of one inspector of election from each town. Each town or ward was made an election district. The act of April 5, 1842, made the supervisors the county canvassers, and provided for the division of towns and wards into a convenient number of election districts. This duty devolved upon the supervisors, assessors and clerks of towns, who were required to do it where the population ex- ceeded five hundred. Election Days.— The act of February 13, 1787, appointed the last Tuesday of April the day for the general election, which might be held for five days. By the act of April 17, 1822, it was changed to the first Tuesday of November, and the polls were opened, bj' adjournment from place to place, for three succes- sive days. The act of April 5, 1842, the Tuesday suc- ceeding the first Monday of November was desig- nated, and the election was confined to one day. The election for town officers takes place on the last Tuesday of March. SrPERVisoRS.— By the "Duke's Laws," promul- gated in 1(565, the Courts of Sessions levied the taxes upon the towns. By an act of the General Assembly, passed October 18, 1701 (13th William III.), the jus- tices of the peace, in special or general session, were directed to levy once a year the necessary county and town charges and allowance for their representative in the General Assembly, to make provision for the poor, and to issue warrants for the election of two assessors ' "An act to fix and ascertain the place for election of representatives to serve in General Assembly for cjunty of Westclieater, passed the 25th of November, ]7il." and one collector, and for the collection of taxes.* These duties were transferred to a Board of Supervis- ors by an act of General Assembly i)asscd June 19, 1703 (2d Anne), entitled " An Act for the better ex- plaining and more effectually putting into Execu- tion an Act of General Assembly made in the third year of the Reign of their late Majesties King William and C^ueen Mary, entitled an Act for defraying the publick and necessary charges thro'out this Province and for maintaining the poor and Preventing Vaga- bonds." The freeholders and inhabitants of each town were authorized to choose once each year, on the first Tuesday of April (unless otherwise directed), one supervisor, two assessors and one collector. The supervisors elected were directed to meet in the county town on the first Tuesday of October, ascertain the contingent charges of the county and such sums as were imposed by the laws of the colony, apportion to each town, manor, liberty, jurisdiction and precinct their respective quotas, and to transmit them to the assessors of the different towns, etc., who should ap- portion them among the inhabitants. The supervis-' ors were authorized to choose annually a treasurer. The Court of Sessions was thus relieved of that por- tion of its duties which was legislative and not judi- cial. Supervisors had been chosen in several of the towns before the passage of the act of 1703 (East Ches- ter, 1686; Mamaroneck, 1697; New Rochelle, 1700), but what were their duties it is impossible to state. The records of the proceedings of the supervisors prior to 1772 having been lost during the Revolutionary War, we can only surmise what sections of the county came under the provisions of the act. East Chester, Westchester, Philipsburg, Pelliam Manor, Morrisania, Mamaroneck, New Rochelle, Bedford and Rye prob- ably elected these oflficers. The census' for 1712 gives some idea of the civil divisions recognized by law or usage, with the population of each, — " Westchester 572 East Cliester 300 Kye 516 New Rochelle 304 Yoinikers 260 Philipsburg 348 5lo Marroiiack 84 Morrisania 02 Pelham 62 Bedford 172 Cortland's Pattent 91 Ryke's Pattent 32 Scarsdale 12 Total 2815 " November 1, 1722 (9th Geo. I.), an act was passed entitled "An Act to increase the number of Supervis- ors in the county of Westchester, and that no wages of Supervisors shall be any part of the said county's rate for the future." After authorizing the choice of a freeholder by the freeholders and inhabitants, it was 2 Civil List, 1880, p. 209. 3 O'Callaghan's "Doc. Hist, of N. V.," vol. i.J 646 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. provided that in case of failure to elect, or where there were not more than twenty inhabitants, the owner of the manor or his steward should be supervisor. The freeholders of the Manor of Cortlandt were author- ized, by the act of December 16, 1737, to elect annu- ally one supervisor, one treasurer, two assessors and one collector, and Ryke's Patent, by the act of Janu- ary 27, 1770, were granted a similar privilege. While much is left to surmise prior to the year 1772, the records give both the towns and the supervisors who represented them from that day to this. The follow- ing is the list for 1773: " Wm, Barker, Esq., for Scarsdale ; Doct. Haverlond, for Rye ; Col. Cortlandt, for Yonkers; Jas. Pell, for Pelliam ; Col. Holmes, for Bed- ford; Jas. Ferris, Esq., for Westchester; Col. Morris, for Morrisania; .\bijah Gilbert, for Salem ; Wm. Davis, for Philipsborougli ; Doct. Daton, for North Castle ; Stephen Ward, for Eastchester ; Wm. Sutton, Esq., loan officer and supervisor for Memorineck ; Justice Lockwood, for Poundridge ; Maj. Cortlandt, for Cortlandt JIanor ; Jas. Cronkhite, for Ryks Patten ; Doct. Graham, for the White Plains." i The supervisors met at first in the county town, Westchester. This place being inconvenient, the supervisors were directed to meet in the school-house at Rye, by an act entitled, " An Act to alter the place of the supervisors' meeting in the county of West- chester," passed 29th of November, 1745, with the privilege of adjourning to such place as the majority should deem proper. The population of the northern portions of the county increased rapidly, and for their convenience the place of meeting was changed by act of February 6, 1773, to the court-house at White Plains, with the same privilege of adjournment. After the burning of the court-house, in 1776, the super- visors became a vagrant body, with no certain meeting- place. They met in Bedford, Manor of Cortlandt or Salem. But few towns were represented. All through these trying years we find about the same persons present, — Ebenenezer Lockwood, of Poundridge ; Major Joseph Strang, of Manor of Cortlandt; Israel Lyon, of Bedford ; Jacob Purdy, of North Castle ; and Abijah Gilbert, of Salem. May 31, 1784, the supervisors met at the house of John Cromwell, in Harrison's Precinct, and there were present the fol- lowing persons : John Thomas, Rye ; Wm. Paulding, Manor of Philipsburgh ; Jona- than G. Tompkins, Manor of Scaredale; Joseph Strang, JIanor of Cort- landt ; Thad. Crane, town of Upper Salem; Benj. Stevenson, New Kochelle ; Israel Honeywell, Yonkers ; Miller, Harrison's Precinct ; Ehenezer Lockwood, Poundridge; Ebenezer L. Burling, East Chester; Abel Smith, North Castle ; Daniel Horton, White Plains; Gilbert Budd, Hamaroneck ; Abijah Gilbert, Salem. The business was to levy two thousand pounds on Westchester, Yonkers, East Chester, New Rochelle, Mamai'oneck, Manor of Scarsdale and the Manor of Pelham, as a war tax. By the act of March 7, 1788, entitled " An act for de- fraying the necessary charges of the respective counties of the State," this county was divided into twenty towns viz. : Bedford, Cortlandt, East Chester, Greenburgh, 1 See Record of Board of Supervisors. Harrison, Mamaroneck, Mount Pleasant, New Ro- chelle, North Castle, North Salem, Pelham, Pound- ridge, Rye, Salem, Scarsdale, Stephentown, West Chester, White Plains, Yonkers and Yorktown. " The name of the town of Salem was changed to South Salem April 6, 1806, and to Lewisboro February 13, 1840, and a part of North Salem was annexed Apri? 26, 1844. Ossining was formed from Mount Pleasant May 2, 1845. New Castle was formed from North Castle March 18, 1781, and a part of Somers annexed May 12, 1846. The name of Stephentown was changed to Somers April 6, 1808. We?t Farms was formed from Westchpster May 13, 1846. Morrisania was formed from West Farms December 7, 1855. King's Bridge was formed from Yonkers December 16, 1872. By an act of the Legislature passed May 23, 1873, the towns of Morrisania, West Farms and King's Bridge were annexed to the county of New York, to take effect on the 1st day of January, 1874.^ From 1784 to 1788 the supervisors met in different places, usually, however, at White Plains, once in the Presbyterian meeting-house at Bedford ; after the latter date they met alternately at the court-houses, at Bedford and White Plains until 1870; since the latter date the court-house at White Plains has been their place of meeting. CIVIL LLST. ' Colonial Assembly. — The history of the various assemblies and conventions of the colonial period is a very important part of that of the struggle which ended in the independence of the colonies. It began in the conflict between the people and the director- general and Council in the Dutch colonial period, in which the former claimed a voice in the government, and the " Twelve Selectmen" of 1641, "The Eight Men " of 1643 and 1645, and " The nine men " of 1647, '49, '50 and '52, which necessity wrung from the latter, are really the later Assembly in embryo. Our interest begins with the English period. March 1, 1665, a con- vention met at the summons of Governor Nicolls, at Hempstead, L. I., simply for the promulgation of the " Duke's Laws," which had been framed by the Gover- nor under the authority of James, Duke of Y^ork and Albany. Westchester (later the borough and town of Westchester) was represented by Edward Jessup and John Quinby. The tyranny and the customs law of the Duke of York so exasperated the people that the Duke, fearing lest the expenses of the colony should become a charge on his private purpose, sent out Governor Dongan with authority to convene a Gen- eral Assembly. He ordered, September 13, 1683, the election of an Assembly of fourteen representa- tives. The apportionment gave four to Westches- ter. Its first act was entitled " Charter of Liberties and Priviledges granted by his Royal Highness to - Proceedings of the Board of Supervisors, 1873, p. 715. We acknowledge our indebtedness to the Civil List of the State of New York, of 1880, for information, and even language to which special reference is not made. CIVIL HISTORY. 647 the Inhabitants of New York and its dependencies." This act proves its authors worthy descendants of a liberty-loving ancestry, and the true progenitors of the founders of American liberties. James had be- come King of England, and it is scarcely necessary to add that this charter received the royal disapproval, and the General Assembly was abolished, June 16, 1686. Westchester was represented in this Assembly by Thomas Hunt, Sr., Jno. Palmer, Richard Ponton and William Richardson. At Leisler's Assembly, in 1690, Thomas Browne was Westchester's repre- sentative. He died and a new writ of election wbs issued. Governor Sloughter arrived March 19, 1691, with instructions from William and Mary to re-es- tablish the Assembly and reinstate the people in tiu ir rights. It consisted of seventeen members, but was afterwards increased to twenty-seven. April 9, 1691, it met for the first time. From this date until it ceased to exist, April 3, 1775, it was engaged in one pro- longed conflict with the Governor and the crown for the rights of the people. By the act of May 8, 1699, the representatives were elected by the freeholders of forty pounds in value, who were residents of the electoral district at least three months prior to the issue of the writ. The elections were held by the sheriff at one place in each county, and voting was viva voce. The act of November 25, 1751, directed the sheriff' to hold his court of election near the Presbyterian meeting- house at White Plains. Previously it had been held in the southern part of the county, doubtless at West- chester. Catholics could neither vote nor hold the office, and at one time the Quakers and Moravians were also virtually disqualified by their unwillingness to take the oath. The General Assembly legally dates from 1691, with which date the comjjilers of the colonial laws were directed to commence. In the first eight As- semblies the county of Westchester was represented. By the royal charter of April 6, 1(596, the borough of Westchester (now town) was established, the free- holders of which were empowered to choose a mayor, six aldermen and six assistants or Common Council for the government of the borough ; also one discreet burgess to every General Assembly. The borough of Westchester is represented from the Ninth Assembly. The Manor of Cortlandt was also entitled by its charter (dated June 17, 1697) to one representative after twenty years had elapsed. The General Assem- bly recognized this right June 11, 1734, and Philip Verplanck took his seat .Tune 22d following. From this date what is now Westchester County had three representatives. "On tlie day appointed for the meeting of a new Legislature the members-elect convened at the .\s8enibly t'hanibcr in the City of New York, and if they were above thirteen in number, sent the Clerk of the House to inform the Governor of their attendance. Commissionerg, generally, the Judges of the Supreme Court were sent to the Assembly Chamber to qualify them, after which their presence was required before his Excellency, who requested thcni to ret\irn to their Chamber and elect a Speaker. For that purpose they again retired, and having made a choice, conducted the person elected to the Chair, which was placed at the upper end of the long table. He subsequently presented himself, accompanied by the members, to the Governor, for his approval, which was, of course, granted. The Speaker thereupon addressed the (iov- ernor, and, in behalf of the House, prayed ' that their words and actions may have a favorable construction ; that the members may have free ac- cess to him, and they and their servants be privileged with freedom from arrests.' The Governor having granted this request, opened the session by reading his speech to both Houses, a copy whereof was delivered to the Speaker of the Assembly. Jlessages to the Council were conveyed by one of the nieuiliers of the House, who was mot at the bar of the Council by the Speaker of that body, into whose hands the message was delivered. All money bills originated in the Assembly, which, according to the practice of the House of Commons, allowed no amendment to be nuule thereto by the Council. Both houses were present in the Council Chamber when the Governor passed the bills sent him, on which occa- sion the custom was for his Excellency to ask the advice of his Council with respect to every bill. If approved, he signed them after these words, 'I assent to this bill, enacting the same, and order it to be en- rolled.' The acts were thereupon i>ubliBlied in the open street, near the City Hall, New York, in the presence of the Governor and both branches of the Legislature. .\ll laws passed were subject, subsequently, to an absolute veto of the King." ' LUt of members of the Colonial Assemfily from Westcktstei- County. Joseph Budd, Westchester, 1710-22. John De Lancey, Borough of Westchester, 1708-72. Peter De Lancey, Uorough of Westchester, 1750-08. John Drake, Westchester, lfi',18-1701, 1809-10. Joseph Drake, Westchester, 1713-1.'). Henry Fowler, Westchester, 1701. Caleb Heatlicote, Westchester, 1701-2. John Hoite, Westchester, 17r2-13. John Hunt, Westchester, 10U9-1701. Josiah Hunt, Borough of Westchester, 1702-10. Josiali Hunt, Westchester, 1715-11;. Lewis Morris, Sr., Borough of Westchester, 1710-28. Lewis Jlorris, .)r., Borough of Westchester, 1732-50. Lewis Morris, Sr., Westchester, 1733-.'J8. Lewis Slorris (3d), Borough of Westchester, 1700. Jonathan Odall, Westchester, 1715-1(5. John Pell, Westchester, lfl9l-9.'i. Adolph Phillipse, Westchester, 1722-26. Fred. Phillipse, Westchester, 1726-.^0. Fred. Phillipse (2d), Westchester, 1751-75. Daniel Purdy, Westchester, 1739-43. Joseph Purdy, Westchester, l(;9.")-99, 1701-5, 1709. Joseph Theale. Westchester, 1001-94, 1097. John Townsend, Westchester, 1745-75. Pierre Van Cortlandt, Jfanor of Cortlandt, 1708-75. Philip Verplanck, Manor of Cortlandt, 1734-68. Edmund Ward, Westchester, 1705-09, 1710-12. Isaiic Wilkins, Borough of Westchester, 1772-75. Gilbert Willet, Borough of Westchester, 1728-32. Lsaac Willet, Borough of Westchester, 1772-75. William Willet, M'estchester, 1701-9, 1710-15, 1710-33. William Willet, Westchester, 17.38. Of these members, Adolph Philipse and Lewis Mor- ris, Jr., were elected Speakers. There were thirty-one Assemblies, — terms of service from two months to ten years. The compensation of the representatives from Westchester County and Manor of Cortlandt was six shillings (seventy-five cents) a day ; that of the repre- sentative of the borough of Westchester, ten shillings (SI. 25.) These allowances were paid by their con- stituents. Delegates to the Provin'cial Convention of April 20, 1775. — This convention was summoned by the Committee of Sixty, because the General Assem- bly refused to comply with the recommendation of the Continental Congress to choose delegates to the > Civil List, 1880, page 259. 648 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Continental Congress. The Westchester County elected Samuel Drake. Jonathan Piatt. Robert Graham. John Thomas, Jr. James Holmes. Philip Van rortlaniU. Lewis Blorris. Stephen Ward. Provincial Congress. — The last session of the Colonial Assembly was held April 3, 1775. These conventions were four in number. The first Provin- cial Convention met May 22, 1775. The apportionment varied. Some of the members were elected for one year, others for six months. The vote was taken by counties. The First, Second and Third Congresses met in New York, while the Fourth was migratory, — meet- ing at White Plains, Fishkill and Kingston. The deputies were chosen from the counties in the same manner as representatives to the Colonial Assembly. Deputies from Westchester Coiintij. Name. No. of Congress. David Dayton 1st. Gilbert Drake 2d, 3d, 4th. Joseph Drake 1st, •2d. Peter Fleming 3d. Lewis Graham 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th. Robert Graham 1st, 2d. Samuel Haviland 3d, 4th. James Holmes 1st. Ebenezer Lockwood 2d, 3d, 4th. Zebadiah Mills 4th. Gouverneur Morris Ist, 3d, 4th. Lewis Morris 4th. William Paulding 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th. Jonathan Piatt 4th. Benj. Smith 4th. John Thomas, Jr Ist, 2d. Jonathan G. Tompkins 3d, 4th. Philip Van Cortlandt 1st. Pierre Van Cortlandt 2d, 3d, 4th. Steplien Ward 1st, 2d. COMMITTKE OF SAFETY AND COUNCIL OF SAFETY. ' — During the recesses of the Congresses, a Commit- tee of Safety from its members was entrusted with executive functions. After the formation of the Con- stitution of 1777 a temporary form of government, called the Council of Safety, was appointed until a Governor and Legislature should be elected. Members from Westchester County. Gouverneur Morris. Jonathan G. Tompkins. Pierre Van Cortlandt. The latter was the presiding officer. State Conventions. — The Fourth Provincial Congress, which assumed the name of the Conven- tion of Representatives of the State of New York, re- solved itself into a convention to frame a Constitu- tion for the State. August 1, 1776, a committee^ of thirteen members was appointed to prepare a form of government. This committee reported March 12, 1777, and the first Constitution was adopted April 20th, following. It is saturated with the principles for which the people had contended for more than a cen- > For names of representatives of Fourth Provincial Congress, see list above. Gouverneur Morris, of Westchester County, was on the com- mittee. tury. The three distinct functions of government were recognized. A Legislature, consisting of a Sen- ate and Assembly, was the law-making body. The executive officer was called the Governor. The ap- pointing power was vested in a Council of Appoint- ment, which consisted of one Senator from each of the four Senatorial Districts. These members of the Council were appointed annually by the Assembly. The Governor, who presided over the Council of Ap- pointment, was to have " a casting voice, but no other vote." The elective officers were Governor, Lieuten- ant-Governor, Senators, Assemblymen and the clerks, supervisors, constables and collectors of the several towns. All other officers — civil and military — were appointed by the Council of Appointment. Male resident owners of freeholds of one hundred pounds' value elected the Governor, Lieutenant-Governor and Senators ; while owners of freeholds of twenty pounds in value, etc., were entitled to vote for Assembly- men. The Second Convention convened in Poughkeep- sie June 17th, 1788, pursuant to an act of Legisla- ture, to consider the Federal Constitution. On July 26th the convention ratified it by a vote of thirty to twenty-seven, seven not voting. The followiug were the delegates from Westchester, all of whom showed their good sense by voting to ratifv : Thaddeus Crane. Richard Hatfield. Philip Livingston. Lewis Morris. Lott W. Sarls. Philip Van Cortlandt. The Third Convention is that of 1801, which was held at Albany October 13th to 27th, pursuant to an act passed April 6th of that year, to settle the contro- versy which had arisen regarding the relative powers of the Governor and Council of Appointment respect- ing nominations for office, and to consider the expe- diency of altering the Constitution in regard to the number of Senators and Assemblymen, with power to reduce and limit the same. The Convention unanimously decided that the Council of Appoint- ment had equal powers of nomination with the Gov- ernor; fixed the number of Senators at thirty-two and the Assemblymen at one hundred, to be increased after each census, at the rate of two yearly, until they reached the number of one hundred and fifty. Delfijntes from Westchester Covnty. Thomas Ferris. Israel Honeywell. Jonathan G. Tompkins Pierre Van Cortlandt, Jr. Ebenezer White. The Fourth Convention was held in Albany Aug- ust 28 to November 10, 1821. The question of a Con- vention for the Revision of the Constitution was sub- mitted to the people, It was carried by a very large majoritj'. The burning questions of the day were about the Councils of Revision and Appointment. The former was objected to as exercising its veto power contrary to the ideas for which the colonists contended, and as being beyond the reach of the peo- CIVIL HISTORY. 649 pie ; aud the latter, because it had assumed judicial authority. The Constitution of 1821 was ratified by the people February, 1822. The vote was put into the hands of all white male citizens, ^^rtually without condition. The Councils of Revision aud Appoint- ment were abolished. Appointments, for the most part, were made by the Governor, by and with the ad- vice and consent of the Senate. The number of elec- tive officers was increased. Delegates from Westchester County. Peter A Jay.i Peter J. Munro. .lonatban Ward. The Fifth Convention met, pursuant to the vote of the people and an act of the Legislature, at Albany, June 1, 1846, and continued in session until October 9th of the same year. The new Constitution was rati- fied by the popular vote November 3, 184G. Judicial officers were made elective. Members of Assembly in each countj- had been hitherto elected on a general ticket. The third Constitution of 1846 directed the Boards of Supervisors to divide their counties into Assembly Districts. Delegates from Westchester Couiity. John HuDter.2 Aaron Ward. The Sixth Convention, convened in the same man- ner as the preceding, met in the Assembly Cham- ber, in Albany, June 4, 1867, and adjourned, sine die, February 28, 1868. It consisted of thirty-two dele- gates at large and four from each Senatorial District. Only the judiciary article was ratified. Dekgiites from the \inlh Semitiiruil District.^ Robert Cocliraii. William H. Morris. Abraham B. C wnger. Abraham B. Tappan. The CoxsTiTi TioxAL CoMMifisiox — The Gover- nor was emj)owered,^ by and with the advice and con- sent of the Senate, to appoint thirty-two persons, four from each judicial district, as a commission to frame into amendments several provisions contained in the rejected Constitution of 1867. The commission began its work in Albany December 4, 1872, and completed it March 15, 1873. Most of the amendments pro- posed were submitted to and ratified by the people. Membirrs of the Commisrioii, Second JiidU ial Ditlrkt.^ Jdo. J. Armstrong. Odle Close. Erastns Brooks. Beuj. D. Silliman. State LEtusLATrRE.— The Legislature of the State of New York is composed of the Senate and As- sembly, the members of both bodies elected by the people, l^t a voce voting was done away with by the act of February 13, 1787, and since that the ballot has been used in elections. Sexate.— Under the Constitution of 1777 the 1 Mr. Jay did not sign the Constitution. ! Did not sign the engrosseil Constitution. ' Putnam, Rockland and Westchester for the Ninth Senatorial Dis- trict. < Laws, 1872, ch. S84. ' Westchester County belongs to the Second District. Senate consisted of twenty-four members, apportioned among the four districts, which bore the designations Southern, Middle, Eastern and Western. The Conven- tion of 18(11 increased the number of Senators to thirty-two, and the State was divided into eight dis- tricts. Since the adoption of the Constitution of 1846 there have been thirty -two districts, each entitled to one member. The term of office is two years ; under the Constitution of 1777 it was four. Westchester County has belonged, successively, to the Southern, First, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Twelfth. List of Itisiilents of Westchester Countu who have Represented the various Dit- tricts to which it hat belonged in the Senate. Xanies. Years in the Senate. Benj. Brandreth 1850-51, 1858-59. William Cauldwell 1868-71. Darius Crosby 1815-18. Samuel Haight 1797-1800. Richai-d Hatfield 1795-1802. John Hunter 1823, 18.36^. Sir James Jay 1778, 1781-«2. Philip Livingston 1790-93, '95, '98. Allen JIcDonald 1832-35. Lewis Jlorris 1777-90. Richard Morris 1778-79. Henry C. Xelson 1882-84. William Xelson 1824-27. Ebeuezer Purdy 1801-6. William Robertson . . 1844-43. Hezekiah D. Robei-ts<.>n 1860-63. William H. Robertson 1854-55, 1872-81. Edmund G. Sutherland 1866-67. Thomas Thomas 1805-8. John Townsend 1820-22. Philip VanCortlaudt 1791-94. Pierre \an Cortlaudt 1777. Jonathan Ward 1807-10. Stephen Ward 1780-S3. Assembly. — Assemblymen are elected annually. Originally the Assembly consisted of seventy mem- bers. The Constitution of 1821 fixed the number permanently at one hundred and twenty-eight. Prior to the adoption of the Constitution of 1846 all the members of Assembly were elected on a general ticket ; since then the counties have been divided into districts. The representation from this county has varied from six in 1777 to two in 1836. At the present time it is entitled to three. List of Members of Assembly from Westchester County, 1777-1885. 1777 to 1847. Xames. Yeara in Assembly. William Adams 1798-99. Jeremiah .^ndereon 1825. Joseph H. Anderson 1833-34. Benjamin Barker 1807. John Barker 1796-98. William Barker 1809-10, 1812-14, 1818-19. Francis BaiTette 1838. James E. Boers 1847. Joseph Benedict 1778-79. Thomas Bowne 1795. Aaron Br.)wn 1829-.'J0. Joseph Bron n 1789-90. Xeliemiah Brown, Jr 182:t-24. Ebenezer S. Burling 1784-85. Joseph Carpenter 179(>-97. Joseph T. Carpenter 1841-42. George Comb 18' Kl. 650 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. I .Antlioiiy Constiint 1845 Pierre Van Cortlaudt, Jr . . . 1792, 1794-95. St Joliii Oonstfiiit 18*>3 '31 1831. 1777-79 1788-89 1825 1778. D&riuB Crosby 1811-12. 1832-33. Edwin Crosby 1834-35 1794-95. I^iclioliiB Crixger • • 1838. 1816-17. IjSiwrcncc D&v6iiport 1829-30 1814. ^Rthnnicl Dplevan . 1781-82. 1826. Sfl>niu6l Drake 1777-81, '86, '88. 1844. Benjamin Ferris 1808 '24. 179G, 1809 -10. . . 1839-40. 1848 to 1885. Andrew Findlay . 1843-44. District. Name. Years in Assembly. John Fisher 1827-28. 2. 1872. TVilliani Fisher 1836-37. 2. 1871. Peter Fleming 1791 2. Theodore H. Benedict . . 1851. Joel Frost . 1806, '08. 1. 1866. 1832 2. 1879, '80. 1824. 3. 1864,. '65, '66. Abijah Gilbert . , 1779-86, *88, '91, 1800-5. 1. 1851. Robert Graham 1777-78 1800-1 3. 1861. 1819-21. 2. 1880-82. Samuel Haight 1782-84, 1789-92. 1. 1874. Mordecai Hale 1796-97. 2. 1856. Richard Hatfield . ... 1794. 3. 1862, '63. John R, Hay ward .... 1846. 1. 1857. Samuel L Holmes 1843 1. 1869. Israel Honeywell Jr 1777-79 1. 1853. Israel Honeywell . . 1798-99. 1. George H. Forster . . . 1876. Philip Honeywell . . 1806. 1. 1864. Jonathan Horton 1788-91. 2. Newberry D. Halsted . . 1862. Joseph Hunt . . 1822. 2. 1852. Benjamin Isaacs . 1807 1814-16, '18 1. 1873. John Lawrence 1782-83 1883. Elijah Lee 1798-99 3. 1858. Thomas R. Lee . 174'>. 3. 1859, '60. Philip Livingston 1788-89 1. Ebenezer Lockwood 1778-79 1784-88. 2. Lawrence D. Huntington 1866. Ezra Lockwood 1806 3. 1869-78, '81, '84, '85. Horatio Lockwood , . . 1833-3G 1841-42. 1883-85. Ezra Marshall 1846-47 1882, '83. Seth Marvin 1807 2. 1849. Abraham Miller 1808 1811-14 1810-17 1820-21 2. Edward D. Lawrence . . . 1869, '70. Zebediah Alills 1777-84 1. 1854. Bernarthis Montross . 1837. 2. 1864, '65. 18-?7 28 1. 1852. Gouverneur ^lorris 1777-78 2. 1850. Richard V Morris 1814 2. J Munro 1814-15 Cliarles P. McClelland , 1885. Thomas Murphv 1831 1. William J. JlcDermott . 1861. William kelson 1820-21 1. William T. B. Milliken 1860. Elias Newman 1702-94 '96 1877, '78, '81. Abraham Odell 1800-5 1807-10 1. 1870. Jacob Odell 1811-12 g. , 1868. Ozias Osburn 1808 1. 1872. Prince W. Paddock 1835-36. 2. 1853, '54. 1779-80 2. 1860, '61. Philip I*ell Jr 1779-81 1784-86 Norton P Otis 1884. Ebene/er Piirdy 2. 1848. William ReQ^ua George J. Penfield . . • . 1867, '68. 1 780-8'? 1 787-1 K( JO 1. 1877, '78. Joseph Scofield ...... . 1825-37. 1. 1867, '68. Walter Seaman 1788-90 George W. Kobertson . 1882. 1810 1. William £1, Robertson . . 1849, '50. Abel Smith 1704-96 1798-1802 1829-30 2. Charles 31. Schietfelin . 1875, '76. John H Smith 1826 1871. Thomas Smith 1(^92-23 '3*^ 2. 1859. Joseph Strang 1780-81 1787-88 1. 1875. Joseph Strang 1839-40 1. 1856. Charles Teed 1706-1800 Edmund G. Sunderland 1857, "58. 1 7SP_«S 1 709-OT 1 800-4 1. 1862, '63, '65. Enoch Thompson . . . . 1822. 1. 1858. 1804-6. 3. 1867, '79, '80. Jonathan G. Tompkins . . . . 1780-88, 1791-92. 1. R. M. Underbill .... 1848. 181G-17. 1. Augustus Van Cortlandt 1859. 1802-5. 2. Frederick W. M'aterbury 1855. 1828. 1. 1879. 1788-90. 2. . 1873, 74. CIVIL HISTORY. 651 Residents of Westchester County in the Continental Congress. — Originally these delegates were chosen by the Provincial Congress. The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union adopted by the Continental Congress, November 15, 1777, directed the appointment annually of delegates by the State Leg- islatures. The number from each State was not to be less than two or more than seven. This State usually sent five, occasionally six. The votes in Con- gress were by States. Name. Yeftfs iu Continentnl Congress. Gouverneur Morris 1777, '78. Lewis Morris' 1775. Philip Pell 1788. Residents of Westchester County who have Represented their District in Congress. — This county originally was divided ; the northern tier of towns formed, with Dutchess County, one district, while the remainder was, with New York, in another. Later it formed with Richmond a district. Since then it has been in the following districts: Third, Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth and Twelfth. The term of office is two years. Name. Years in House of Representatives. Joseph H. Audersou 1843-17. Joel Frost 182:1-25. . ,Iohn B. Hiiskins 1857-01. William Nelson 1847-51. N. Holmes Odell 18T5-77. Jared V. Peck 1853-55. Clarkson N. Potter 18G9, 1S75, 1877-79. Wiiliam Radford 1863-07. William 11. Robertson 1807-69. Caleb Tompkins 1817-21. Philip Van Coi tlundt 179.3-1809. Pierre Van Cortlandt, Jr 1811-13. Aaron Ward 1825, 1829,1831, 1837, 1841, 1843 Jonathan Ward 1815-17. Colonial Supre.me Court Justices. — Appoint- ment vested in the Governor ; the term of office, his pleasure. chief Justices, Name. Appointed. Joseph Dudley May 15, 1691. William Smith November 11, 1692. Stephen Van Cortlandt October 30, 1700. Abraham De Peyster January 21, 1701. William Atwood August 5, 1701. William Smith June 9, 1702. John Bridges April 5, 1703. Roger Mompesson luly 15, 1704. Lewis Jlorris March 13, 1715. James de Lancey August 21, 1733. Benjamin Pratt November 11, 1761. Daniel Horsemanden March 16, 1763. AssocUtte or Puisne Judges of Colonial Supreme Court. Name. Appointed. Thomas Johnson May 15, 1091. William Smith May 15, 1691. Stephen Van Cortlandt May 15, 1691. William Pinhorne May 15, 1691. William Pinhorne April 3, 1C93. Chidlcy Brooke April 3, 1093. John Lawrence April 3, 1693. ' Signer of the Declaration of Independence. John Guest June, 1698. Abraham Do Peyster October 4, 1698. Robert Walters Augusts, 1701. John Ilriilges lune 14, 1702. Robert Jlilward April 5, 1703. Thonuis Wenliam April 5, 1703. James De Lancey June 24, 1731. Frederick Philipse June 24, 1731. Frederick Philipse August 21, 17.33. Daniel Horsemanden Jan\iary 24, 1736. John Chambers July 30, 1751. Daniel Horsemanden July 28, 1753. David Jones November 21, 1758. Daniel Horsemanden March 20, 1762, David Jones March 31, 1702. David Jones March 16, 1763. William Smith, the elder March 16, 1763. Robert R. Livingston March 10, 1703. (ieorge D. Ludlow December 14, 1769. Thomas Joties September 29, 1773. Wliitehoad Hicks February 14, 1770. State Supreme Court. — Under the Constitution of 1777 appointment was vested in the Council of Appointment, and the term was during good behav- ior or until si.xty years of age. Under that of 1821 the Governor appointed with the advice and consent of the Senate. The term remained the same. The Constitution of 1846 made the office elective and the term eight years. The amendment to the judiciary article adopted November, 1869, lengthened the term to fourteen years. Chi^'f Justices of the Stttie Supreme Court Name. Appointed. John Jay May 8, 1777. Richard Morris October 23, 1779. Robert Yates September 28, 1790. John Lansing, Jr February 15, 1798. Slorgan Lewis October 28, 1801. James Kent July 2, 1804. Smith Thompson February 3, 1814. Ambrose .Spencer February 29, 1819. John Savage January 29, 1823. Samuel Nelson .\ugust 31, 1831. Greene C. Bronson March 5, 1845. Samuel Beardsley . . June 28, 1847. Associate or Puisne Ju.'iticcs of the State Supreme Court. Name. .\ppointed. Robert Yates May 8, 1777. John Sloss Hobart May 8, 1777. John Lansing, Jr September 28, 1790. Morgan Lewis December 24, 1792. Egbert Benson January 29, 1794. James Kent February 6, 1798. John Cozine August 9, 1798. Jacob Radcliff December 27, 1798. Brockholst Livingston January 8, 1802. Smith Thompson January 8, 1802. Ambrose Spencer February 3, 1804. Daniel D. Tompkins July 2, 1804. William W. Van Ness June 9, 1807. Joseph C. Yates February 8, 1808. Jonas Piatt February 23, 1814. John Woodworth March 27, 1819. Jacob Sunderland January 28, 1823. William L. .Marcy January 21, 1829. Samuel Nelson February 1, 1831. Greene C. Bronson January 6, 1836. Esek Cowen August 31, 1836. Samuel Beardsley February 20, 1844. Freeborn G. Jewett March 5, 1845. Frederick Whittlesey Juno 30, lc47. Thomas McKissock July 1, 1847. 652 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Circiiil Judges (Second (XtcuU). Name. Appointed. Samuel E. Belts April 21, 182.3. James Emott February 21, 1827. Charles H. Ruggles March 9, 1831. Selah B. Strong March 27, 1846. Seward Barculo April 4, 1846. Justices nf Supreme Court (Second District). Name. Elected. Selah B. Strong June 7, 1847. AVilliam T. McCown June 7, 1847. Nathan B. Morse June 7, 1847. Seward Barculo June 7, 1847. John W. Brown November 6, 1849. Selah B. Strong November 9, 1851. AVilliam Rockwell November 8, 1853. Gilbert Dean June 26, 1854. James Emott November 6, 1855. Lucien Birdseye August 13, 1856. John W. Brown November 3, 1857. John A. Lott November 3, 1857. William W. Scrugham November 8, 1859. AVilliani Fullerton August 30, 1867. Stephen W. Fullerton November 5, 1867. John A. Lott November 5, 1861. Joseph F Barnard November 3, 1863. Jasper \V. Gilbert November 7, 1865. Abraham B. Tappen November 5, 1867. Calvin E. Pratt November 2, 1869. Jackson 0. Dykman November 2, 1875. County Judges. — The Court of Common Pleas was erected by the act of 1691. It was composed of one judge and three justices, who were appointed by the Governor and held office during his pleasure. In 1702 the judge was assisted by two or more justices Under the first Constitution there was one judge and several assistant judges. The act of March 27, 1818, abolished the office of assistant judge and limited the number of judges to five. Under the State govern- ment the appointment was at first vested in the Coun- cil of Appointment, and the office was held during their pleasure. Later, the Governor, with the advice and consent of the Senate, appointed the county judges, and the term was five years. The Constitution of 1846 made the office elective and the term four years. The amendment of 1869 extended it to six years. Juiges of the Court of Common Phas a»d Countij Court t^CoUniial). Name. Appointed. Caleb Heatlicote 1695. William Willett 1721. Frederic k Philipse November 2, 1735. Samuel Purdy January 22, 1752. John Thomas Slay 8, 1755. Slate a^netitutiom of 1777 and 1821. Name. Appointed. Lewis Morris i Jlay 8, 1777. Kobert Graham February 17, 1778. Stephen Ward May 6, 1784. Ebenezer Lockwood • ... March 15, 1791. Jonathan G. Tompkins Februarj- 16, 1793. Ebenezer Purdy February 23, 1797. Jonathan G. Tompkins 1798. Elijah Lee January 20, 1802. John Watts March 29, 1802. Caleb Tompkins June 8, 1807. William Jay June 7, 1820. Caleb Tompkins February 10, 181i3. Robert S. Hart March 27, 1846. Albert Lockwood June, 1847. 1 Appointed by ordinance of Provincial Convention. Constilution of 1846. Name. Elected. John W. Mills November, 1851. William H. Robertson November, 1855. Kobert Cochran November, 1867. Silas D. Gifford November, 1871. Isaac N. Mills 2 November, 1883. Surrogates. — The authority to grant probates was vested in the Governor as the representative of the King, and he was the ordinary of the Prerogative Court. All wills relating to estates in New York, Orange, Richmond, Westchester and Kings Counties were to be proved in New York. In the towns under the Duke's Laws the constables, overseers and justices took charge of the estates of intestates. Under the act of November 11, 1692, this duty was performed by two freeholders appointed or elected for the pur- pose. Surrogates were appointed by the colonial Governor at a very early date — for Westchester County as early as 1730. They had very limited powers. Since the organization of the State the surrogates have been vested with the authority to grant pro- bates, subject to api^eal to the Court of Probates. Counties where the population exceeds forty thousand may be authorized by the Legislature to elect such an officer. Otherwise the county judge acts as such. The office was filled by appointment of the Council of Appointmeni ; later by the Governor and Senate. Un- der the Constitution of 1846 it became elective. The term was at first during the pleasure of the appoint- ing power. From 1821 to 1846 they were appointed for four years. Since the office became elective the term has been six years. Colonial Sutrogates of Westchester County. Name. Appointed. Gilbert Willet 1730. John Barton February 9, 1754. Caleb Fowler June 10, 1761. David Daton June 9, 1766. Suj-rogates of Westchester Countij under the ConstitulionB of 1777 and 1821. Name. Appointed. Richard Hatfield March 23, 1778. Philip Pell. Jr March 13, 1787. Samuel Youngs October 31, 1800. Edward Thomas January 28, 1802. Samuel Youngs February 19, 1807. Ezra Lockwood March 10, 1808. Samuel Y'oungs February 16, 1810. Ezra Lockwood February 12, 1811. Samuel Youngs March 19, 1813. Henry White March 16, 1815. Samuel Youngs July 8, 1819. Ebenezer White, Jr February 17, 1821. Jonathan Ward March 28, 1828. Alexander H. Wells February 7, 1840. Frederick J. Coffin Jlay 1, 1844. Surrogates of Westchester County under the Constitution o/1846. Name. Elected. Lewid C. Piatt June, 1847. Kobert U. Coles November, 1855. Silas D. Gifford February 5, 1862. John W. Mills November, 1862. Owen T. Coffin 3 November, 1870. - Present incumbent. 3 Present incumbent. CIVIL HISTORY. 653 District Attorneys. — By the act of February 12, 1790, the State was divided into seven districts, each of which had an attorney, called assistant at- torney-general. The Assistant Attorney-General be- came, in 1801, district attorney. By the act of April 1818, each county became a district, and had its own district attorney. Under the Constitu- tion of 1777 the Council of Appointment filled the office during pleasure ; that of 1821 vested the ap- pointment in the Court of Sessions, while under the present one the oflSce is elective. District Attorneys— First Dittricl ^—Act of 1796. Kanie. Appointed. Nathaniel LHwrence February 16, 1796. Cadwallader D. Colden Januarj- 16, 1798. Actof\m:^ Name. Appointed. Riclianl Riker August 19, 1801. Cadwallader D. Colden February 13, 1810. RicUard Riker Febniarj- 19, 1811. Barent Ganlenier March 5, 1813. Thomas S. Lester .\pril 8, 1815. Act of 1818.3 Name. .\ppointed Robert P. Lee Jnne 12, 1818. Aaron Ward July 8, 1819. William Nelson Febniary 21, 1822. Richard R. Voris September 27, 1844. William W. Scrogham June, 1847. Edward Wells November, 1856. William 11. Pemberton NoTember, 1859. Pelham L. JlcClelan November, 1862. John S. Bates November, 1865. Jackson 0. Dykeman November, 1868. Daniel 0. Briggs November, 1871 . Rol)ert Cochran November, 1874. Nelson H. Baker < November, 1877. Sheriff.^*. — During the colonial period the sheriffs were appointed annually by the Governor, usually in the month of October. The Constitution of 1777 vested the appointment in the Council of Appoint- ment. The term was one year, and no person could hold the office for more than four successive years. The Constitution of 1821 made the office elective and the term three years. No sheriff is eligible for re- election for the next succeeding term. Colonial — Yorkshire. Name. Appointed. William Wells March 11, 1665. Robert Coe 1CG9. John Manning September 7, 1671. Sylvester Salisbury December 9, 1674. Philip Wells July, 1675. Thomas Willett July 1, 1676. Richard Betts 1678. John Young 1680. Westvhest^ County. Name. Appointed. Beqjauiin Collier November 9, 1683. Thomas Statham December 14, 1689. Bei^amin Collier March 21, 1691. 1 First District included Kings, Queens, Richmond, Suffolk and West- chester Counties. - First District included Kings, Queens, Richmond, Suffolk, Westches- ter until 1816, and New York until 1815. 'Each county became a district. < Present incumbent. John Shute October, 1698. Edmund Ward October, 1699. Jeremiah Fowler October, 170(1. Isaac Dunham October, 1701. Roger Barton October, 1702. Israel Honeywell, Jr October, 1709. Gilbert Willet October, 1723. Jacobus Van Dyck October, 1727. Gilbert Willet October, 1730. Nicholas Cooper October, 17.33. Isaiic Willet October, 1737. Lew is Graham October, 1767. John De Lancey October, 1769. James De Lancey June 27, 1770. State — Constitution of 1777. Name. Appointed. John Thomas, Jr May 8, 1777. John Thomas January 6, 1778. Jesse Hunt March 29, 1781. John Thomas March 8, 1785. Philip Pell March 13, 1787. Thomas Thomas March 22, 1788. Samuel Haight February 21, 1792. Ellas Newman March 1, 1796. William Barker March 26, 1799. Jonathan Ward February 17, 1802. Daniel Delevan March 19, 1806. .(oseph Hatfield March 23, 1807. St. John Constant March 10, 1808. Elijah Ward February 10, 1810. St. John Constant February 12, 1811. Lyman Cook February 26, 1812. Zabud June March 16, 1815. Lyman Cook February 25, 1818. Ward B. Howard February 14, 1821. ConstUutimts of 1821 and 1846. Name. Elected. John Townsend November, 1822. •\llan McDonald November, 1825. David D. Webbers November, 1828. Aaron Brown November, 1831. Joseph H. Anderson November, 1834. .\mos T. Hatfield November, 1837. Joseph Lyon November, 1840. William H. Briggs November, 1843. James M. Bates November, 1846. Benjamin D. Miller November, 1849. .\lsop H. Lockwood November, 1852. Daniel H. Little November, 1855. William Bleakley, Jr November, 1858. Lieniiin B. Tripp November, 1861. Darius Lyon November, 1864. John Bussing November, 1867. Robert F. Brundage November, 1870. Ziba Carpenter November, 1873. Robert F. Brundage November, 1876. James C. Courier November, 1879. Stephen D. Horton^ November, 1882. County Clerks.— "The County Clerk, during the colonial period, was constituted by his commission clerk of the Court of Common Pleas, Clerk of the Peace and Clerk of the Sessions of the Peace in his county. Under the first State Constitution, it was his duty to keep the County Records and act as Clerk of the Inferior Court of Common Pleas and Clerk of the Oyer and Terminer. County Clerks are now likewise Clerks of the Supreme Court in their respective counties."" During the colonial period appointment was vested in the Governor; under the ( Present incumbent. • avil List of State of New York, 1880, p. 384. €54 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. first Constitution of 1777, in the Council of Appoint- ment; since then the ofiBce has been elective and the term three years. Colonial. Name. Appointed. John Rider May 11, 1684. Jopepli Lee September 13, lfi84. Edward Collier 1688. Joseph Lee JIarch 14, 1691. Benjamin Collier October 17, 1698. John Clapp October 4, 1707. Daniel Clark 1711. William Forster 1722. Benjamin Nicoll May 14, 1746. John Barstow April 23, 17G0. Stitif Co}Utilutioii of 1777. Name. Appointed. Jolin Barstow May 8, 1777. Richard Hatfield September 22, 1777. Thomas Ferris January 29, 1802. Elijah Crawiord March 10, 1808. Thomas Ferris February 16, 1810. Elijah Crawford February 12, 1811. Thomas Ferris March 19, 1813. Elijah Crawford March 16, 1815. William Reqna June 8, 1820. Nehemiah S. Bates February 17, 1821. Constitutions of 1821 and 1846. Name. Elected. Nehemiah S. Bates NoTember, 1822. Nathaniel Bayles November, 1828. John H. Smith November, 1834. Chauucey Smith December 7, 1839. Charles A. Purdy November, 1840. Munson I. Lockwood November, 1843. Robert R. Oakley November, 1849. John P. .Jenkins November, 1855. Hiram P. Rowell Novemuer, 1858. Chauncey M. Depew > May 25, 1867. William W. Pierson 2 July 22, 1867. J. Malcolm Smith November, 1867. John M. Rowell November, 1876. James F. D. Crane 3 November, 1882. CoFNTY Treasurers. — During the colonial period the treasurers from 1701 to 1703 were elected by the justices of the peace in the Court of General or Spe- cial Sessions; from 1703 to 1846 by the supervisors. The Constitution of 1846 made the office elective and the term three years. Name. Elected. Elisha Horton November, 1848. Robert Palmer November, 1851. Lieman B. Tripp November, 1854. Henry Willetts ... November, 1857. Gilberts. Lyon-" November 25, 1866. N. Holmes Odell November, 1872. George W. Davids November, 1875. David Cromwell * November, 1878. County Superintendents of Cojimon Schools. — The Boards of Supervisors were directed, by the act of April 17, 1843, to appoint County Superintendents -of Common Schools. The office was abolished March 13, 1847. Samuel L. Holmes. John Hobbs. ' Appointed vice Rowell, deceased. - .\ppointed I'ice Depew, who failed to qualify. Present incuinbent. -•Appointed vice Willetts, resigned. ' Present incumbent. School Commissioners. — "Prior to 1857 School Commissioners were appointed by the Boards of Su- pervisors. Since that year they have been elected on a separate ballot. The first election under the act creating the ottice (chapter 179, Laws of 1856) was held in November, 1859. Term, three vears."* A. G. Reynolds. Jared M. Horton. Theodore Kent. William Miller. Samuel U. Berrian. William G. Weston. Isaac D. Vermilye. Abel T. Stewart. James W. Husted. John S. Bates. Henry White. Henry A. Wells. Joseph Barrett. First District, Frrankliu W. Gilley. Joseph H. Palmer. Joseph F. Wood. Jared Sanford." Second District. George W. Smith. Casper G. Brower. Theodore B. Stevens. James B. Lockwood. 8 Tldrd District. Isaac C. Wright. Edward N. Barrett. Piatt R. H. Sawyer. James F. Williams. »"> C*ums, 1698 . 1703 . 1712 . 1723 . 1731 . 1737 . 1746 . 1749 . 1756 . 1771 . 1782 . 1790 . 1800 . 1810 . 1,063 1,946 2,815 4,409 6,033 6,745 9,235 10,703 13.257 21,745 7,330" 24,003 27,347 30,272 1814 26,367 1820 32,638 1825 33,131 1830 36,456 1835 38,790 1840 48,687 1845 47,578 1850 58,263 1855 80,678 1860 99,497 1865 101,197 1870 131,348 1875 103,.564H 1880 108,987 LIST OF SUPEEVISOBS," 1772-1787. 1772. William Davis Philipsburgh. M'illiam Sutton Mamaroneck. Ebenenezer Lockwood Poundridge. James Holmes Bedford. Stephen Ward East Chester. Abijah Gilbert Salem. Richard Willis. . . New Rochelle. William Barker. Scarsdale. David Daton North Castle. Robert Graham A^Tiite Plains. James Van Cortlandt Yonkers. Pierre Van Cortlandt Manor of Cortlandt. 177.3. William Barker Scarsdale. Samuel Haviland Rye. James Van Cortlandt Yonkers. James Pell Pel ham. James Holmes Bedford. James Ferris Westchester. Morris Morrisania. Civil List, 1880, p. 398. ' Present incumbent. 8 Present incumbent. ' Appointed vice Sawyer, deceased. Present incumbent. 11 Census of North Castle, Bedford, Poundridge, Salem, Manor of Cort- landt, Ryck's Patent. 12 Towns of Morrisania, West Farms and King's.Bridge anne.ved to New York City by chap. 613 of laws of 1873. 13 Records of Board of Supervisors. CIVIL HISTORY. 655 Abij»b Gilbert Salem. William Davis Pbilipsbiiigh. David Daton Xurtb Castle. Stephen AVarJ Kast 01ie.ster. William Siitton Mainaroueck. Ebenezei- Lockwood Pouudridge. 1774. Pierre Vau C'ortlandt Manor of Cortlandt. JamfcS Cronkliite Kyck's Patent. Robert Gmbain W hite I'laius. Pierre Van Cortlandt Cortlandt JIanor. James Holmes Bedford. Samuel Haviland Rye. DaTid Daton Xortb Castle. James Ferris Westchester. William Sutton JIamaroneck. Ebenezer Lockwood Poundridge. William Davis Philipsburgh. William Barker Scarsdale. James Cronkbite Kyck's Patent. Robert Graham White Plains. Stephen Waul Kast Chester. 1775. Samuel Haviland. James Van Cortlandt. William Davis. William Barker. Pierre Van Cortlandt. Ebenezer Lockwood. Stephen Ward. Lewis W. Donald. Joseph Drake. James Pell. Samuel Purdy. Abijah Gilbert. James Norton. David Daton. 177S. Ebenezer Lockwood. Jacob Purdy. Joseph Strang. Abijah Gilbert. Israel Lyon. Januari/ 5, 177U. Ebenezer Lockwood. Israel Lyon. Joseph Strang. Abyah Gilbert. Jacob Purdy. Febniarif 19. 1779. Jacob Purd.v. Israel Lyon. Joseph Paulding. .\bijah Gilbert. March IS, 1779. Ebenezer Lockwood. Joseph Pauliling. Joseph Strang. Jacob Purdy. Israel Lvon. Maij 13, 1780. Samuel Haight Manor of Cortlandt. Jacob Purdy North Castle. Israel Loon Bedford. William Dandier Poundridge. Abijah Gilbert Salem. October 9, 1780. Isniel Lyon Bedford. William Dandier Poundridge. John Van Tassel Kyck's Patent. 1781. Samuel Haigbt Manor of Cortlandt. Abijah Gilbert Salem. Samuel Haight Manor of Cortlandt. Israel Lyon Bedford William Fancher Poundridge. .\bijah Gilbert Salem. Junuanj 28, 1782. Zebediah Mills Bedford. Samuel Haight Manor of Cortlandt. Ebenezer Lockwood Poundndge. Abijah Gilbert Salem. Jl/.i;; 29, 1782. Peter Fleming Bedford. Ebenezer Lockwood Poundridge. James Cronkbite Kyck's Patent. Abijah Gilbert Salem. Samuel Haight Manor of Cortlandt. 1783. Ebenezer Lockwood Poundridge. Joseph Strang Manor of t'ortlandt.J , ^ Peter Fleming Bedford. Ab^ah Gilbert Salem. James Cronkbite Kyck's Patent. 1784. # John Thomas Rye. William Paulding Philipsburgh. Jonathan G. Tompkins Slanor of Scarsdale. Joseph Strang. ... • Manor of Cortlandt. Thaddeiis Crane Town of I'pper Salem. Benjamin Stevenson New Rochelle. Israel Honeywell Yonkers. William Miller Harrison's Precinct. Ebenezer Lockwood Poundridge. Ebenezer E. Burling East Chester. Abel Smith North Castle. Daniel Horlon White Plains. Gilbert Budd Maniaroiieck. Abijah Gilbert Salem. Peter B'leming Town of Bedford. 1784. Abel Smith Precinct of North Castle. Thomas Hunt Borough Town of Westchester William Paulding Manor of Philipsburgh. Jonathan G. Tompkins Manor of .Scarsdale. Thaddeus Crane Town of Upper Salem. William^ Miller Harrison's Precinct. Joseph Strang Manor of Van Cortlandt. Ebenezer Lockwood Precinct of Poundridge. Gilbert Budd Town of Mamaroneck. Ebenezer S. Burling Town of East Chester. Daniel Horton Precinct of Wliite Plains. Israel Honeywell Yonkers. John Thomas Town of Rye. Philip Pell Manor of Pelham. Benjamin Stevenson Town of New Rochelle. William Morris Manor of Morrisauia. Abijah Gilbei t Town of Lower Salem. June 28, 1785. Gilbert Budd Mamaroneck. William Davis Manor of Philipsburgh. Jonathan G. Tompkins Manor of Scarsdale. Joseph Strang Manor of Cortlandt. Ebenezer Lockwood Poundridge. Peter Fleming Bedford. Abraham Leggett M'estchester. Daniel Horton White Plains. Abel Smith North Castle. James Cronkbite Ryck's Patent. James Hunt East Chester. AVilliam Miller Hairisou's Precinct. Jesse Hunt Rye. Abijah Gilbert Salem. Oc(o6er 4, 1785. Je.'se Hunt Town of Rye. Benjamin Stevenson Town of New Rochelle. William Davis Manor of Philipoburgb. Daniel Hunt White Plains. Lewis Morris Manor of Morrisania. Philip Pell Manor of Pelham. Thaddeus Crane Town of Upper Salem. Peter Fleming Town of Bedford. Abraham Leggett Town of Westchester. James Cronkbite Ryck's Patent. Jonathan G. Tompkins Manor of Scarsdale. Joseph Strang Slanor of Cortlandt. Abel Smith District of North Castle. Ebenezer Lockwood District of Poundridge. James Hunt Town of East Chester. William Miller Harrison's Precinct. Abijah Gilbert Town of Lower Salem. 656 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. 3Iay 9, 1T8G. William Morris Slanor of Morrisauia. Lake Hunt Town of Westchester. James Hunt Town of East Chester. Gilbert Budd Town of Mamaroneck. Jesse Hunt Town of Rye. William Miller Harrison's Precinct. Jonathan G. Tompkins Manor of Scarsdale. Abraham Guion Town of New Rochelle. Philip Pell Manor of Pelhani. Daniel Horton Precinct of White Plains. Abel Smith Precinct of North Castle. William Hadley Precinct of Yonkers. Jonathan Horton Manor of Philipsburgh. James Cronkhite Kyck's Patent. Joseph Strang Manor of Tan Cortlandt. Zebediah Mills Town of Bedford. Ebenezer Lockwood Parish of Pouudridge. Hachaliah Brown Town of Upper Salem. Abi,iah Gilbert Town of Lower Salem. 178G. Jesse Hunt Town of Rye. Gilbert Budd Town of Mamaroneck. Abraham Guion Town of New Rochelle. Philip Pell Manor of Pelham. James Hunt Town of East Chester. William Hadley Precinct of Yonkers. Jonathan Horton Manor of Philipsburgh. Jonathan G. Tompkins Manor of Scarsdale. Daniel Horton Precinct of White Plains. William Miller Harrison's Precinct. Abel Smith Precinct of North Castle. Zebediah Mills Town of Bedford. Joseph Strang Manor of Cortlandt. James Cronkhite Ryck's Patent. Ebenezer Lockwood Precinct of Poundridge. Hachaliah Brown Town of Upper Salem. Abijah Gilbert Town of Lower Salem. Lake Hunt Town of Westchester. 1787. Gilbert Budd Mamaroneck. Theodocius Barton New Rochelle. Philip Pell Manor of Pelham. Jonathan 6. Tompkins Manor of Scarsdale. William Miller Harrison's Precinct. Richard Hatfield White Plains. David Hunt Yonkei-s. Isaac Requa Manor of Philipsburgh. Abel Smith North Castle. Joseph Strang Manor of Cortlandt. Jonathan Ferris Ryck's Patent. Zebediah Mills Bedford. Ebenezer Lockwood Poundridge. Abijah Gilbert Lower Salem. Stephen Ward East Chester. Israel Underbill Westchester. CIVIL LIST FOB 1880. BepresetiUitive in Congress — \ith District. William G. Stahlnecker, Yonkers. (District composed of Westchester County and Twenty-third and Twenty-fouith Wards of New York City.) State Senator — 12th District. Henry C. Nelson, Sing Sing. (Senatorial district composed of West- chester and Rockland Counties.) Members of Assembly. First District, Charles P. McClelland, Dobbs Ferry. (District composed of Greenburgh, Mount Pleasant and Y^onkers.) Second District, Norman A. Lawlor, Mount Vernon. (District com- posed of East Chester, Harrison, Mamaroneck, New Rochelle, North Castle, Pelham, Rye, Scai-sdale, West Chester and White Plains.) Third District, James W. Husted, Peekskill. (District composed of Bedford, Cortland, Lewisboro, New Castle, North Salem, Ossining, Poundridge, Somers and Y'orktown. ) Surrogale. Owen T. Coffin, Peekskill ; Clerk of Surrogate's Court, William M. Skinner, White Plains ; Record Clerk, Benoni P. Piatt, White Plains, Special Clerk, Elias P. Purdy, White Plains. Supreme Court Stenographer. D. C. McEwen, Tribune Building, room 77, New York City. County Judge. Isaac N. Mills, Mount Vernon. Justices of Sessions. Stephen Billings, Verplanck's ; John H. Baxter, Peekskill. Stenographer, Harvey Husted, White Plains. Intei-preter. A, R. Stainach, WTiite Plains. District Attorney. Nelson H. Baker, Sing Sing ; Assistant District .attorney, David Ver- Planck, White Plains. County Clerk. John M. Digney, Yonkers ; Deputy County Clerk, Franklin Couch, Peekskill ; Record Clerk, M. James Mooney, Y'onkers. County Treasurer. David Cromwell, White Plains ; Deputy County Treasurer, Thomas B. Hodge, Mount Vernon. Regiiiter. Joseph 0. Miller, New Castle ; Deputy Register, B. Frank Palmer, Mamaroneck ; Searcher, Benjamin S. Dick, M hite Plains. Sheriff. John Duffy, White Plains; Under Sheriff, William Ryan, Rye ; Jailer and Deputy Sheriff, Frank G. Shirmer, White Plains; Clerk and Deputy Sheriff, Charles E. Johnson, Mount Vernon ; Deputy Sheriffs : John 0. Verplanck, White Plains; Stephen .4. Marshall, Port Chester; Alfred Lawrence, Tarrytowu ; William H. Sommers, Mamaroneck ; Erastus R. Finch, Purdy'e Station; Jot'U T. McGrath, Yonkers; James Mabie, Peekskill ; Mark Skeunion, West Chester. Stenographer to Grand Jury. Warren C. Brown, Tarrytown. Court Crier. James E. Campbell, White Plains. Idbrarian. Harold T. Kinch, Pleasantville. Chaplains to County Almshouse. Rev. Lawrence H. Van Dyke, Rev. Patrick Egan, Tarrytown. Phijricians to County Almshouse. Dr. N. C. Husted, Tarrytown ; Dr. R. B. Coutant, . Watchman OfUrt'House. Alexander Jones, White Plains. Janitor Court-House. Thomas Zimmerman, White Plains. Keeper County Almshouse. Charles Fisher, East Tarrytown. Keeper Pelham Bridge. Coroners. Edward J. Mitchell, Yonkers; Leonard D. Tice, Mount Vernon ; Eli- jah Purdy, White Plains ; George H. Sutton, Sing Sing. Superintendents of the Poor. Aaron F. Read, Arinonk ; James E. Hoyt, Katonah. School Cominissioners. Jared Sandford, Mount Vernon ; James B. Lockwood, ASTiite Plains; John W. Littel, Peekskill. Loan Commissiomrs. Isaac B. Noxon, Sing Sing ; Jonathan Vail, Yonkers. David Blizzard. SCARSDALE. 657 Totm Cleris. William 11. Pierce, R. John Bowilen, D. Frank Wiley, 1). Frederic Howe, R. oil lit I'lSftSHDt J. Benedict See, D. Elijah Grossman, D. ^"c\v lioclicllc . D. William H. C'reomer, R. Samuel B. Clark, R. Henry Austin, R. Purdy G. Sands, D. Peter M. Dobbs, D Jacob W. Tompkins, R. D. , R- William H. Dotv, R. Theodore T. Tompkins, R List of Supervisors. Towns Names. Politics. BedfonI Rep. Cortlaiiilt . . Deni. Eiist Clu'Ster Dem. r6 1? n I) iir*''li Dem. Rep. Lcwisboro' • . . Rep. 5X11111 11 roiicck Dem. Bit. PWftSjiiit Dem. I^CW 0)t8tl6 Rep. 2"»6w Kochcllb Rep. Jforth Sulciii Rep. North Castle . Joseph B. See Rep. Ossiiiiii^ * • ( Dem. 111 (I III Dem. Poll lid rid "'e Dem. Kve Dem. Dem. Rep. West Chester . . Dem. White Plains . . Dem. Dem. Dem. TOWN HISTOEIES. CHAPTER XV. SCARSDALE. BY ALL.\>' M. BUTLER, M.D. The town of Scarsdale is in its general outline rhomboidal, the long diameter running nearly due north and south and extending from a point about a mile south of the county court-house in White Plains in a southerly direction for two miles. The shorter diameter runs nearly due west from Scarsdale Station, 62 on the New York and Harlem Railroad, for about a mile and three-quarters, until it meets " Branch Brook," a small stream forming part of the western boundary of the township. The area of the town is about six thousand acres, and the general regularity of its outline is broken just west of the southern angle by a projecting portion of the town of New Rochelle, nearly a mile in lenoth and ranging from one-half to one-cjuarter of a mile in brealete, nothing but a small portion of the walls remaining. Fortuuately, there was an insurance on the build- ing, and, although much difficulty and delay were experienced in settling matters with the insurance companies, who preferred to rebuild themselves rath- er than pay the insurance, work on a new church wiis finally begun, and after many months of anxiety and trouble the new building was completed, services being meanwhile held in private houses. The services of re-consecration took place on the 4th of November, 1883, just nineteen months after the conflagration, and were conducted by the Right Rev. H. C. Potter, assistant bishop of New York, aided by several others of the clergy. Of these ceremonies the Churchman for November 17th has the following account : " This church was re-consecrated on Sun- day, November 4th, by the assistant bishop of the diocese, aided by the Rev. Francis Chase, rector ; the Rev. Dr. Olsen, a former rector; the Rev. W. W. Montgomery, of Mamaroneck ; the Rev. F. B. Van Kleeck, of White Plains ; and the Rev. ilessrs. Forbes and Drisler. The church, repaired and rebuilt after the fire of last year, and adorned with many gift* from parishioners and friends, was bright and cheer- ful. A large congregation was in attendance and the music, though simple, was perfect. The bishop de- livered the sermon, which was worthy to be heard in 668 ' HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNT!. every quarter of the commonwealth. Three persons were confirmed. In the afternoon the Rev. Dr. Olsen preached to his former flock. It was a day to be long remembered in Scarsdale." In external appearance the new church is very like the first building, differing in no essential particular, although the workmanship in parts is inferior to that of the former. Within, also, the church is little changed, the arrangement and construction of chan- cel, nave, roof and windows being as before. The tone of the walls and woodwork is, however, much lighter than in the foi'mer building, while the stained glass is but a parody upon the beautiful chancel windows of the old church. The font has been almost exactly restored, and stands just outside of the chan- cel, on the right. The new furniture, consisting of altar, chancel-chair, double stall, reading desk, pulpit and brass lectern, is quite different in style from that which it replaces,but is handsome,and harmonizes well with the surroundings. It is the gift of friends of the parish, in memory of Mrs. Valeria Baugess, a former parishioner, whose remains lie in the little church- yard. Other gifts include a full set of lesson-books, and pulpit-lamp, altar-cover, altar-vases and alms- basin, all in brass. The organ, — of one manual, — from the shops of Hood & Hastings, Boston, is very prettily decorated, and was purchased with the insur- ance money of the former organ, occujjying the same position, — at the western end of the nave. The chap- el is nearly an exact counterpart of the one it re- places. Belonging to the church is a commodious rectorj', situated on a pleasant spot nearly due north of the church, and about five minutes' walk from it. Following is a list of all the i-ectors of Scarsdale : Election or Acceptance of Call. Besigiiation. January 31, 1850, Rev James F. Le Baron .\pnl 1, 18.M, Rev. William M. Olsen .... October 1. 1871. December 3, 1S71, Rev. Stephen F. Holmes . . May 1, 1872. July 1, 1S72, Rev. Henry Webbe August 31, 187.'i, .Tanuarj- 28, 1874, Rev. William A. Holbrook . . Octobers, 1877. February 1, 1879, Rev. Francis Cbase. In 1853, two years after the consecration of the church, the following were the published statistics of the parish : Families, 20; souls, 115; baptisms, 4; communicants, 50. In 1855 the church building and lot were valued at 86500, and the seating capacity of the former was for 211 persons- The attendance w^as 120 persons, and the communicants numbered 53. In 1865 the valuation of the property had risen to 88000. There were 60 communicants and an average attend- ance of 40 persons. The following are the latest par- ish statistics: Families, 45 ; souls, 214; baptisms,?; confirmations, 3 ; marriages, 3 ; burials, 6; commun- icants, 74; Sunday-school scholars, 44; teachers, 7. Total amount collected for all objects, §2555,02. The following were the original officers of the par- ish : William S. Popham and Mark Spencer, church | wardens ; Charles W. Carmer, William H. Popham, ' Francis McFarlan, Joshua Underbill, Edmund Lud- low, Samuel E. Lyon, Augustus Bleecker and Orrin Weed, vestrymen. The following are the present offi- cers of the parish, the senior wardenship being now vacant on account of the recent death of the Honora- ble William S. Popham, who had held the office of senior church warden continuously since the founda- tion of the parish, viz. : Lewis C. Popham, church warden ; Alexander B. Crane, James Bleecker, Charles K. Fleming, Oliver A. Hyatt, S. Bayard Fish, Lewis B. Atterbury, Henry W. Bates and Cornelius B. Fish, vestrymen. The interments in the parish graveyard number one hundred and ten. To the southwest of the church are the vaults of the Bleecker, McFarlan and Pop- ham families, and in the last-named repose the re- mains of the late William Popham, of Revolutionary fame, and his son, William Sherbrooke Popham. In this churchyard lie the remains of several un- known persons who died within the town limits, and so were given burial here. The following curious epitaph, — the only j)eculiar one in the little burying- ground, — appears on the tombstone of James Bell. The stone was prepared by him and the lines were pre- sumably of his own composition, — " All you friends who are gathered here to weep, Behold the grave wherein I sleep ; Prepare for death while you are well, — You'll be entombed as well as Bell.'' At the northwest corner of the Fox Meadow estate, and within a few rods of Hartsdale Station, stands a small iwo-stoiT frame structure formerly known as the " Fox Meadow Chapel." This building was first used as a carriage factory, but soon after the estate passed into the hands of Charles Butler, in 1856, it was converted into a private chapel under the above name. The first floor contained seatings for about a hundred persons and at the south end of the room was a dais with a small pulpit. The second story was merely used as a loft. For many years the chapel was used by no organized society, but its pulpit was occupied, upon invitation, by various Presbyterian clergymen, among others, by the Rev. Drs. Lyman Abbott and Irena'us Prime. At a later period the chapel was used by the Methodist Society of Hartsdale, who held there their Sunday-school and afternoon services, — their own church being inconveniently situated. This was continued until the building of anew church by the society rendered the use of the chapel un- necessary. Since then the chapel has not been used for religious purposes beyond the holding of an oc- casional prayer-meeting within its walls. For some time thereafter the upper floor was occupied by a local temperance club as its meeting-room, and in 1875 and again in 1882 the lower floor was used as a theatre for the presentation of amateur performances, under the name of the " Scarsdale Opera-House." The building is now arranged for such purposes, with a stage, etc., on the ground floor, the auditorium SCARSDALE. having a seating capacity for about one hundred and twenty-five persons. Although, until the building of the Church of St. James the Less, Scarsdale had no place of worship besides the Friends' Meeting-House, services were held in the town for many years previous to that date. For this purpose use was made of the old " Fox Meadow " school-house, which formerly stood on Fish's Hill, the ^Methodists and Presbyterians holding services on alternate Sundays. The Rev. George Donovan, a clergyman of the former denomination, who contributed so much to the early success of the public school, often officiated here as pastor as well pedagogue. Again, during the Rebellion, when there appears to have been some interruiHion in the services at Fox Meadow Chapel, services were fre- quently held in the house of Dr. Bruen, on the former Cooper estate. Schools. — Although the early records of the Scars- dale public school have entirely disappeared, there ap- pears to have been such a school in existence at the end of the last century, for the town-meeting of 1784 was held "attthe School-house in said Manner near Captain Jonathan Griffin's." The building here mentioned was probably the first one in the town and stood at the top of the steep bank to the west of the White Plains road, just north of the road to Hartsdale Station. Nothing now remains to mark the spot but a portion of the foundations, the building itself hav- ing been destroyed by fire early iu the present century. In 1796 the offices of "Commissioners of Schools" were first instituted in the town, J. Barker, William Popham and Caleb Angevine being chosen to fill the position for the first year. In 1809 was built a new school-house to replace the one destroyed, and this still remains, but is now occupied as a dwelling. It formerly stood part way up Fish's Hill to the north of the roadway, but was moved many years ago to its present site, to the north side of the Hartsdale road. There is much of interest connected with this old school- house, though in itself it is quite unpretending. It is a small frame building of two stories, measuring about twenty-five by twenty feet in the ground plan, and unpainted. The school-room was on the ground fioor and above was a loft. Soon after the erection of this building the school acquired considerable prominence from the scope of its curric- ulum, and it is related that people living in New York sent their children to board in the town that they might enjoy the advantages of its jtublic school. This prominence was largely due to the ability of the Rev. George Donovan, before mentioned, a graduate of Trinity College, Dublin, who, on becoming a resident of the town, in 1802, at once interested him- self iu the school, and introduced there the study of the ancient languages, in addition to the common- school branches. In 1817 we find that he was elected " Inspector of Schools," his colleague being William Popham, their offices being in addition to the school commissioners before mentioned. During these early days of the century the school came to be known as the " Scarsdale Academy," from the high grade of its instruction. Later on, however, when the conduct of the school passed into other hands, much of its reputation was lost, and it is stated that two of the old time pedagogues came to untimely ends from their fondness for strong drink. One was drowned, while intoxicated, in the deep spring on the west side of Dobb's Hill, just south of the site of the birth-place of Governor Tompkins and the other in a drunken frenzy committed suicide in a field nearly opposite the present school. This second building was known as the " Fox Meadow School-House " and we find it thus mentioned as a fretjuent place for holding town meet- ings. The State census of 1845 gives figures in relation to the school as follows. Value of building, one hundred dollars ; Number of pupils, 35 ; average at- tendance, 18. The present school records only cover a period of about twenty years, and are very brief. In 1870 the school trustees were Philip Waters, James McCabe and John Carpenter, Benjamin Palmer being clerk. In this year five hundred dollars was voted for the expenses of the school, and the teacher was Miss Eliza Algood, who occupied the position for a num- ber of years. In 1874 it was determined to erect a new and more suitable building for school purposes, and a thousand dollars was voted by the town for procuring the nec- essary land, while in the following year twenty-five hundred dollars was appropriated for the building itself and nine hundred for furnishing it suitably. The building committee consisted of Benjamin F. Butler, Benjamin Carpenter, Peter Dobbs, James McCabe and John Read. The building was begun early in Feb- ruary of the centennial year, and was ready for occu- pancy the following September. In 1880 the school- tax amounted to $796.25, being assessed at the rate of $1.86 per thousand dollars. For that year the statistics were as follows : There were one hundred and twenty- six children in the school district between the ages of five and twenty-one, and sixty between the ages of eight and fourteen. School was held during forty- two weeks of the year. The trustees were John H. Carpenter, Peter M. Dobbs and James D. McCabe, Gilbert W. Dobbs being clerk. The teacher was Miss Ameigh. At this time the library contained one hundred and fifty volumes. The following are the statistics for 1884 : Trustees, David A. Weed, Benjamin J. Carpenter and F. W. Brooks ; Clerk, Gilbert W. Dobbs ; Teacher, Miss Mars- land; number of weeks of school, forty-three ; children in district between the ages of five and twenty-one, one hundred and thirty-six ; between the ages of eight and fourteen, sixty-six. Books in library, two hun- dred and fifty. The school-tax for the year amounted to $841 .25, being assessed at the rate of §1 .92 per thousand. HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. The new school-house is situated at the junction of the old and new White Plains post roads, just at the foot of Fish's Hill, a little north of the Hartsdale road, and faces due west. It is about fifty by thirty feet on the ground plan, with two stories and a basement, the entrance to which is on the east. The latter is now used by the town as a place of meeting and for the holding of elections. In its external aspect the build- ing is very pleasing, the basement being of stone and the upper part frame, clapboarded, and a slate roof. The front gable is surmounted by a small open cupola, in which hangs the school bell. The building is neatly painted in a light shade of gray, with darker trimmings. The ground iloor proper is occupied by a commodious and well-arranged school-room, fitted up with modern school furniture, and adjoining are the vestibule and cloak-rooms, the former opening upon a small porch. The loft above is unfurnished, but the basement is fitted up for the uses of the town with benches and a small dais at the west end of the room, the walls being finished in plaster. In this connection it is interesting to note that the percentage of illiteracy in the town has of late years been very low, as is evidenced by the following figures, taken from the State census reports : In 1855 it was 1.10 per cent. ; in 1865, 1.07 per cent. ; and in 1875, 1.51 per cent. Shortly after the erection of the Church of St. James the Less the organization of a parish school was undertaken, and the first notice of this is found in the report of the convention of New York for 1853, which says, " A small building for the purposes of a Parochial School is now being built." This stood in a pleasant situation a few hundred yards to the northwest of the church, and on a private road leading through the Popham property to Scarsdale Station. The next year the convention records contain no report of the parish school, but in 1855 we find the following: Daily Parish Schools, One, part free — Males, 6 ; Females, 11." That year eighty dollars was contrib- uted by the church toward the parish school building. The next year the number of scholars had risen to twenty — males, fourteen ; females, six — and one hun- dred dollars was contributed by the parish towards the support of the school. Two years after, there were thirty scholars in the school — males, seventeen ; fe- males, thirteen — and the reports say of the school, ■"Teacher boarded free of charge ; otherwise self-sup- porting." In 1859 the number of scholars was largely increased, the average attendance being, males, twen- ty-five ; females, seventeen ; and the total number of those who had attended at least one quarter was sixty- four. The parish contribution towards the school this year was seventy-five dollars. The following year, 1860, is the last in which mention is made of the school in the convention reports, and it shows a great falling off in the attendance, — namely : males, twenty; females, ten. During the winter a night- school had been held for three months, which proba- bly accounts in some measure for the decrease. The attendance at the night-school aggregated twenty-one, thus giving a total of fifty-one scholars. The parish contribution had fallen to fifty dollars for this year. Shortly after this last report the school was given up, apparently from lack of support, and the school- building was used for other purposes. It was moved from its original situation to a position nearly adjoin- ing the rectory of the church, which was built in 1860. Of private schools there have been several in Scars- dale at different times, but none of them have been sufficiently successful to remain. The census report of 1845 makes brief mention of two private schools, but this is the only record that remains of them. Another was started about the year 1871, but proved unsuccessful, and shortly after was closed. Thus the public school is the only one now in existence, but, owing to the excellence of its management, it leaves little to be desired by the townspeople. Leading Residents and Families. — Among all the natives of the town, past or present, no one has been more prominent in the history of the county than Daniel D. Tompkins,' Governor of the State, and after- wards Vice-President of the nation. His ancestors were among the first to settle in the town, and they have at all times figured conspicuously in its history. It is said of him that he embodied in himself, besides the noble virtues, the more commonplace, but none the less important ones of activity, energy and perse- verence, while his talents, no matter how tried, were always equal to an emergency. The reputation he gained at the bar and in the gubernatorial chair, was one of unflinching integrity combined with an un- common charm of manner and the greatest consider- ation for the feelings of all. His administration of the oflSce of Governor during the trying times of the second war with Great Britain was unimpeachable, while his generous and entirely unsolicited financial aid to the government was especially noteworthy. In the capacity of military commander he likewise suc- ceeded admirably, being especially thanked for his services by the President. Governor Tompkins died on Staten Island June 11, 1825, and his remains are interred in the vault of the Tompkins family, at St. Mark's " in the Bowerie," New York City. Jonathan Griffin Tompkins, father of the Governor, though not as distinguished in the history of the nation, was more identified than his son with the history of the town. But besides holding very many town offices, he was a member of the State Con- vention which adopted the Declaration of Independ- ence and the first Constitution of the State. Mr. Tompkins was one of the inspectors of the first town meeting held under the national government, and was chosen first supervisor of the town. This oflSce he 1 a full sketch of Vice-President Tompkins and his father and hrothere will be found in the first volume, in the chapter on the Bench and Bar. SCAllSDALE. 671 held for ten years, from 1783 to 1792, by annual re- election, besides other minor town offices. After the death of his adojjted father jNIr. Tompkins removed from the house where his son Daniel was born to the Griffin homestead, now known as the Sedgwick house, on the northern crest of Dobb's Hill, and the old mansion was afterwards torn down. The Tompkins fiimily were of English extraction, and emigrated from the north of England to Plym- outh, Mass., during the times of religious perse- cution. According to Bolton's narrative, from Plym- outh they went in turn to Concord, Mass., Fairfield, Conn., and East Chester, N. Y., and thence finally to Scarsdale. It is probable that the family was repre- sented in the town as early as the beginning of the last century, for as many as six generations have lived here. Of the sons of Jonathan G. Tompkins, several settled j)erma- nenth' within the town, and proved useful and worthy citizens. The first of these was Caleb, the oldest of the Governor's brothers, who was born in 175ii, and he left a son, J. G. Tompkins, Jr. The former held the offices of poor master, town clerk and supervisor in the town, being chosen to the last-named office at three different times, while his son was twice elected su- pervisor. Another of the brothers, Enoch, born in 1771, held this office for ten years continuously, besides at other times holding numerous minor offices. Another brother still, George Washington Tompkins, likewise made Scarsdale his home for a time, and here was born to him a son. Warren Tompkins, who afterwards took up his residence in White Plains. The Popham Family. — About one-half mile from the railroad depot at Scarsdale , and shadowed be- neath the branches of huge trees, whose leaves en- tirely obscure its inmates from the gaze of the curious, stands the ancient homestead of Chief Justice Richard Morris. It is one of the oldest houses in the county, and although it has from time to time been altered and extended in order to meet the require- ments of modern life, it still retains, in its sloping roof and am])le chimney, a general appearance of antiq- uity. It is now in the possession of the Popham fam- ily, of whom we subjoin a sketch. The Pophams trace their English ancestry as far into HON. DANIEL the past as the beginning of the thirteenth century, when their records show that one Gilbert Popham, of the Manor of Popham, married Joan, a daughter of Kobert Clarke, also of that manor. Members of the family held high offices during the reigns of Henry III. Edward III. and Henry IV. Sir John Po|)ham, Knight, was lord chief justice in the reign of Elizabeth, and so popular had the family become that Charles I. made John Po])liam, one of its members, a Gentleman of the Privy Chamber upon the occasion of his coronation. The family was also represented at the coronation of Charles II. by Sir Francis Pop- ham, who was a Knight of the Bath. At the time of the civil war in England the family became divided, and Sir Francis, who was sixth la descent from the chief justice, rendered himself so obnoxious to Charles I. by his course at that time, that his son John, who was colonel in com- mand of a cavalry regi- ment, was forced to re- move into Ireland, where he purchased the estate of Bandon. Mindful of the family reverses, he named his oldest son Icha- bod. John Popham, the son of Ichabod and father of William Popham, from whom are descended the family so long identi- fied with the history of Scarsdale, was a linen draper, of Cork, and was widely known for his learning, intelligence and piety. His three children were James, William, and Eli- zabeth, who married the architect, John Cook. William Popham, the second child, married a daugh- ter of Rev. William Millet, a Presbyterian clergyman of Bandon, whose family numbered nineteen daughters and three sons. Of their children, Alexander, John and William, the last only, who was born at Bandon, September 19, 1752, came with his father to this country. He was but nine years of age at the time, and was left in the care of two maiden aunts living in New Jei"sey. By them he was entered at Princeton College, from which he graduated just as the Revolution was breaking out. Joining the Continental army, he almost immediately rendered himself famous by the cai)ture of the notorious Captain Rugg and eighteen others at the battle of Long Island. As a reward for his bravery, he received a captaincy, which was subse- TOMPKINS. 672 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. quently supplemented by a major's commission, in recognition of distinguished services rendered at the battles of White Plains and Brandywine. At the close of the war Major Popham resided for a few years at Albany, New York, where he studied law. While there he met and became enamored of Miss Mary Morris, daughter of Chief Justice Rich- ard Morris, with whom, being forced by her father's hostility, he eloped. In 1804, having meanwhile effected a reconciliation with his father-in-law, he established a legal practice in New York City and became in time clerk of the Court of Exchequer. He retired in 1811 to his farm in Scarsdale, where he resided till the death of his wife, in 1836. His own death occurred in New York eleven years later, in 1847. While Major Popham was yet a young man his father, journeying a sec- ond time to this country, was taken sick upon the voyage and died. He was buried by his son at Perth Amboy, N. J. The major at the time of his death was presi- dent of the New York State Society of the Cin- cinnati. He was also its president-general by vir- tue of his right as oldest member. Upon the occa- sion of his decease his name received honorable mention in general orders and his loss was lamented by many who had been his warm friends and acquaintances. Major Popham left six children — Richard, Wil- liam S., John, Charles W., Sarah, wife of Leonard Bleecker, and Elizabeth. William Sherbrook Popham, the second child of this family, was born at Scarsdale, May 9, 1793. In 1815 he entered the Bank of America as clerk, hav- ing previously served as a soldier in the War of 1812. In 1832 he established himself in the coal business in New York City, continuing the same till 1857, when he retired to the ancestral farm in Scarsdale. Here he led the life of a retiring and respected cit- izen. To hik efforts was mainly due the organization of the Episcopal Church of St. James the Less, of which he was senior warden at the time of his death. He married Eliza, daughter of William Hill, of East Chester, and after her decease was united to her sister Jane. Mr. Popham closed a long life of quiet usefulness June 18, 1885, in the same room in which he was born more than ninety years before. His unassumed humility and his simplicity of manner charmed all with whom he came into contact, and made his loss both to his family and to the county in which he lived an irreparable one. He had eight children; William Hill, Mary Morris, wife of Charles W. Carmer ; Alethia Hill, wife of Augustus Bleecker ; Laura Sherbrook, wife of Lewis C. Piatt, Esq., of White Plains; Gertrude, wife of Allen S. Campbell ; Richard Morris, Robert C. and Lewis C. Two of these, William Hill and Richard M., he survived. William Hill Popham, oldest child of William Sherbrook Popham, was born at Scarsdale, Octo- ber 7, 1817. His educa- tion was partly obtained in the old town school of his native place and partly in New York City. His inclination led him at an early age to enter as a clerk the office of a firm in New York which was heavily interested in the iron trade. In 1857, however, upon his father's retirement, he took his business in charge and for some years » conducted it successfully. He was finally induced by his father-in-law to enter the oil business with him, and in this he was en- gaged at the time of his death, June 27, 1880. J While in the oil trade he was also associated with William C. Haxton, now vice-president of the Washington Life Insur- ance Company. Mr. Popham was a gentleman of peculiarly cordial disposition, and his genial manner made him many warm and enthusiastic friendships both in business and social life. He was a member and for the last ten years warden of the Episcopal Church of St. James the Less at Scarsdale, for which he gave the ground. At the time of his death he was a property holder in New York City and a director ofthe Mutual Life Insurance Company. He had also been a member of the Produce Exchange from its organization. Mr. Popham married Miss Sarah Spencer, daughter of Mark Spencer, of New York. Their children are Harriet Spencer, Mark Spencer, RESIDENCE OF THE LATE WM. H. POPHAM, SCARSDALE, N. Y. SCARSDALE. 673 Eliza Hill, William H. Jr., George Morris, Lewis T., Sallie aud James Lenox. Lewis C. Popham, youngest child of Wm. Sher- brook Popham and brother of the preceding, was born in the old homestead at Scarsdale, April 15, 1S33. Receiving his education at the well-known school of Rev. Dr. Harris, at White Plains, he joined his father in business, and in due time succeeded to it and the family estate. Beside carrying on his large business interests in Xew York City, he has been for the last sixteen years justice of the peace of the town of Scarsdale. Like his brother, William H., Mr. Popham is of an exceedingly social disposition, and he is justly reckoned among the most popular citizens of Westchester County. He married Annie J., daughter of Alexander Flemming, of Bellows Falls, Vermont. Their children are Emma A., (wife of Cornelius B. Fish), Alice H., Annie F., Alexander F. and Louise C. Mr. Popham still resides in the old homestead, which was built by his grandfather Major Popham, in 17S3. It adjoins the Morris property and is rich in its collection of antiques, bric-a-brac and old paint- ings. A portion of the tea-set presented to Major Popham by General Washington is still in possession of the family. Another distinguished citizen of the town in the early days was the Hon. Richard Morris, son of the Hon. Lewis Morris, and father-in-law of Major Pop- ham, whom we have mentioned. He resided at the Morris homestead, now occupied by Mrs. William F. Popham. and owned considerable land in the vicinity, in which was included the former mill-seat on the Bronx River near Scarsdale Station. Mr. Morris was commissary or judge of the Court of Admiralty, as well as at one time chief justice of the State, and filled both these offices with much distinction. The Morris house stands on the eastern slope of the ridge, running parallel to the post-road on the west, and is a few hundred yards to the south of the Popham man- sion. Although more than a century and a half old, the house shows few signs of age, for though old-fash- ioned in appearance and construction, it still stands firmer and stancher than many a more modern build- ing. The mansion was constructed about tlie middle of the last century by a man named Crawford, the ma- terial used being prepared at the old saw-mill hereto- fore mentioned. The frame is composed of oak and locust, with oaken joists, and is covered with cedar shingles put on with wroiight-iron clinched nails. The mansion presents a very picturesque appearance with its low slanting rfiof and broad veranda run- ning along the eastern and southern sides. Being on the side of the hill, the house presents three full stories on the east and two on the west, and, with the lawns and flower-beds which surround it makes a most pleasing picture. It is stated that here (xeneral Washington halted and lunched on the march to 63 White Plains, some days previous to the engagement with the British at that place. Prominent among the families of the eastern side of the town in former years were the Secors, the Angevines, the Griffins and the Palmers. The first-named family has always figured prominently in the town's history. In 1809 and for the next two years James Secor held the office of supervisor, while Francis Secor, lately de- ceased, of a generation later, held the same office at different periods for a term of twenty-nine years and extending from 1849 to 1878. Chauncey T. Secor, the present incumbent, son of the preceding, is now serving his third term in the same office. The family is supposed to be of French origin, and probably set- tled in the town some time prior to the Revolution, for the name " Secord " appears in documents re- lating to that period. The old Secor homestead, known as the " Hickories " is in the fai eastern side of the town. The Angevines, originally tenants under Colonel Heathcote, have almost disappeared from the town, and the Griffins, who formerly were scattered throughout the township, are almost en- tirely confined to the eastern part. Of the Palmer family, Richard served as supervisor of the town for thirteen years, between 1831 and 1837 and again from 1839 to 1844, and James F. Palmer, besides holding other offices, was town clerk in 1860. In the house of the latter, on the Mamaroneck road and in a central location, town-meetings and elections were held for a number of years until the erection of the new school- house, and the occupation of its basement for town purposes. The Drakes, whose name has been associated with Scarsdale for over a century, are of English descent, and the first to emigrate to this country, according to Bolton's account, was John Drake, who came to this continent early in the seventeenth century. On his death, he left several sons, one of whom, Samuel, settled in East Chester, and a grandson of the latter, also Samuel, was probably the first to settle in Scars- dale. The only record in connection with Scarsdale pertaining to this member of the family is that of his death, showing that Samuel Drake, son of Jo- seph Drake, of East Chester, " died at the Fox Mead- ows in 1774, aged seventy-five years." The present head of the family in Scarsdale is the venerable Elias G. Drake, now in his eighty-si.xth year, hav- ing been born just before the close of the last century, December 9, 1799. Mr. Drake is the great-grandson of Benjamin Drake, a brother of the Samuel just mentioned, and settled within the town about thirty years ago. Although of late years not taking an active part in town politics, he has figured in many of the older records as the holder of various offices in the town. Another of the prominent families of the town in former days were the Varians, of Huguenot descent, who occupied the house now known as the " Wayside Cottage " just north of the Popham estate. Of this 67-i HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. family, the first of tlie name in tliis countiy was Isaac Varian, who " appears as a butcher in the city of New York in the year 1720, located in the ' Old Slip ' market." He was admitted as a " freeman " of the city of New Y'ork January 23, 1733. In 1737-38 he was a member of the military company of Cap- tain Cornelius Van Home. He accumulated consid- erable property and died at his residence in Bowery Lane, about the year 1800. He left five sous, of whom three — James, Richard and Michael — were ardent patriots and warmly espoused the Revolutionary cause. Of these, however, only James and Michael appear to have been identified with Scarsdale. In the " Book of the Varian Family " the following record is given of these members: "James Varian, second son of Isaac, born in New York City, January 10, 1734; died Scarsdale, N. Y., December 11, 1800; was a butcher in New York until the capture of that city by the British during the War of the Revolution, at which time, in company with other patriots, he removed. He withdrew to a farm at Scarsdale, in the Neutral Ground, where he remained until his decease." Both he and his family were subsequently driven from their farm by the British, and took refuge in Danbury, Conn., whence they returned after the peace was pro- claimed. He married, February 25, 1759,' Deborah Dibble, of Connecticut, by whom he had seven chil- dren, five of whom were born in Scarsdale. " Michael Varian, butcher, born in New York City, December 9, 1738, and was in that vocation for many years at that place. At the time of the Revolution (1775) he moved to Scarsdale, Westchester County, N. Y""., but returned at the close of the struggle, in which he took an active part on the patriot side." He left two sons, but neither they nor their descendants were con- nected with this town. Of the family of James Varian, Jonathan, the eldest, was born in New York, November 13, 1763, and died February 14, 1824, being by occupation a drover. In 1811 he married into the Angevine family, and had four children, of whom one, Andrew J. Va- rian, served during the Rebellion as sergeant in the New York Volunteer Engineers. Jonathan Varian appears to have kept the old homestead as a tavern and inn from very early in the century until his death. His brother James was born in Scarsdale, Novem- ber 22, 1765, shortly after his parents settled in the town, and died December 26, 1841. He was engaged in transporting the Boston mail on the first stage of the route, — from New York to New Milford, Conn. This was performed in the old-fashioned four-horse mail-coaches, and a stop was made at the old Varian tavern. He married a daughter of John Cornell, by whom he had nine children. On the death of Jona- than, in 1824, the estate in Scarsdale appears to have been occupied by James, and after his death, in 1841, by his son, James, from whom it passed into the hands of Charles Butler in 1853. Another son, William A. Varian, is now living at Kings' Bridge, being a practic- ing surgeon, and in his possession is the old family Bible mentioned below. Of the remaining children of the original James Varian, three left descendants, one of them, Deborah, having married Caleb Tomp- kins, brother of Governor Tompkins, and for forty years county judge of Westchester County. Six of the ten town officers chosen at the first election after the Revolution in the Manor of Scars- dale bore the name of Cornell' — then the most numer- ous and one of the most respectable families in the manor ; and some record should be made of them here. The Cornells of Scarsdale and vicinity were descended from Richard Cornell, a member of the Society of Friends, who came from Hempstead, in Queens County, to Scarsdale in 1727. But Richard Cornell's grandfather, Thomas Cornell, more than eighty years before that date, had a plantation, long called Cornell's Neck, in what is now the town of Westchester. Thomas Cornell, of Cornell's Neck, was also an ancestor of the Westchester Willets, once a prominent family in the county and in the province — and also of the Woolse\'s, of Bedford and elsewhere, and therefore should be named here. Cornell's Neck was situated on the East River and was granted to Thomas Cornell in June, 1646, by the Dutch Governor, Kieft, who described it as running " from the Kill of Broncks land, east southeast along the River." ^ •Prepared and inserted by the publishers. - Thomas Cornell, of Cornell's Xeck, was from Essex, England, born about 1595, and emigrated to Boston about 1030. In interesting illustra- tions of the rigorous self-watchfulness of the infant Boston Colony, then only eight years old, it was voted at town-meeting on the inth of -Au- gust, 1638, that "Thomas Cornell may buy brother William Brtlstone's house and become an inhabitant." He was in Khode Island in IG-fl, with Roger Williams, and came to New Amsterdam in lij42, with John Throckmorton, seeking shelter among the Dutch from the rigors of Mass- achusetts orthodoxy. Throckmorton, for himself and thirty five associ- ates, obtained in IG43, from Governor Kieft, the original grant of what is now, in abbreviation of his name, called Throgg's Neck, and he and Cornell, and some of their associates, immediately began settlements, for the Dutch records relate that in the massacre of October, 1643, the In- dians " killed several persons belonging to the families of Jlr. Throck- morton and of Mr. Cornell. " Probably the slain were servants, and Thomas Cornell and his family were then in New Amsterdam, where his eldest daughter, Sara, married, on the 1st of September, 1613, Thomas Willett, of Bristol, England, the ancestor of a distinguished family. W'illiam Willett, the eldest son of Thomas Willett and Sarah Cornell, was baptized in New Amsterdam on the 0th of July, 1644, and their second son, Thomas, on the 26th of November, 104.5. Thomas Willett, the father, died about the time of the birth of hie second son, and his widow, Sara Cornell, in 1647, married Charles Bridges, well known in New Amsterdam, where the Dutch translated his name into Carel Ver Brugge, and the Willett children were brought up in their steiifather's house. William, the elder, inherited Cornell's Neck through his mother after the death of his grandfather, Thomas Cornell, but ultimately died without issue. Thomas, the younger son, became the distinguished Col- onel Thomas Willett, of Flushing — long prominent in colonial affair?, and member of the Governor's Council from 169U to 1698, where he sat with Colonel Caleb Heathcote, Frederick Philips, Colonel A'an Cortlandt and other magnates of the province. He was colonel of the Queens County militia, then the most niimeroua regiment in the province, and was i)ultlicly thanked by the Governor, Lord Cornbury, in November, 1704, that, on an alarm of an invasion by a French fleet, he had in ten hours brought a thousand men to within an hour's march of New York. Colonel Thomas Willett's cousin, Colonel John Cornell, of Kockaway, subsequently commanded the Queens County militia until his death, in 1745. After his brother's death. Colonel Thomas Willett, of Flushing inherited his grandfather's plantation of Cornell's Neck, and in 1709 / SCARSDALE. 675 Richard Cornell, grandson of Thomas Cornell, of Cornell's Neck, and eldest son of John and Mary (Russell) Cornell, of Cowncck, in Henii)stead, was born about 1670, and died at Scarsdale in 1757. He mar- conveyed it to his eldest son, William Willett, who had removed to the comity of Westchester una made the Xeck his home. He sat in the Pro- vincial -Vssembly as one of the representatives of Westchester Connty, with but brief intermissions, from 1702 to his death, in 1733, and was ap- pointed ".Judge of the Common Pleas inthe County " in 1721. But this is not the place to pursue the history of the "Willettsof We,stchester, fur- ther than to show their descent from Thomas Cornell, of Cornell's Neck. The Neck has sometimes been called Willett's Neck. Rebecca Cornell, a younger dausjhter of Thomas Cornell, was with her sister Sara, in New Amsterdam, and tliere married, in 1G47, George Woolsey, of Varmouth, Eufrland, said to have been of the family of Car- dinal Woolsey ; and their descendants are numerous in Westchester County and elsewhere, several having obtained eminence, one of them being Theodore Dwight Woolsey, president of Yale College from 1846 to 1871. Ezra Cornell, the founder of Cornell University, was born at West- chester Landing, between Cnrnell's Neck and Throgg's Neck, on the 11th of January, lSii7, and was descended from Thomas Cornell, of Cornell's Neck, through his son Samucd and grandson .Stephen, who settled in Swansea, Massachusetts, where Elijah Cornell, the father of Ezra, was born in 1771. Elijah Cornell married Eunice Barnard, born in Dutchess County, but of a New Bedford family. He, however, had been but a short time in Westchester when his son Ezra was born, and soon after removed to Tarrytown, and thence in 1819 to l)e Ruyter, so that neither Ezra Cornell nor his sou, Governor .\lonzo B. Cornell, can be called West- chester County men. Thomas Cornell, of Cornell's Neck, had eleven children — six sons (Thomas, Richard of llockaway, William, Samuel, John of Cowueck and Joshua) and five daughters (Sarah, Ann, Rebecca, Elizabeth and Mary). Several of his children settled in tne Eastern States, and he subsequently returned to Rhode Island and died there about lir)7. Two of his sons settled in Queens County. The first, Richard Cornell, was in New -Am- sterdam under the Dutch, and was one of the patentees of Flushing, in the first English charter of lijlio and was long justice of the peace there. He had an estate at Little Neck, and suhseriueutly removed to Rockaway, where he died in IfisH. He is hence usually distinguished as Richard Cornell, of Rockaway. He left a widow, Elizabeth, and five sons, — Rich- ard, William, Thomas, Jacob and John. His grandson, Thomas Cornell, long represented Queens County in the Provincial Assembly, sitting from 173'.t till his death, in 17154. A little later, Sarah Cornell, daughter of his grandson .Samuel, married General JIatthew Clarkson, of New York, and lier sister Hannah, married Herman Leroy, and their sister, Elizabeth, married William Bayard. One of the grandsons of Thomas Cornell, of the Provincial Assembly, was Whitehead Cornell, who represented (ineens County in the State .\ssembly in 1788-98, and lived in dignity in the old homestead of his grandfather, while his elder and his younger brothers, who were Royalists in the Revolution and officers in the British Army, were glad, after the war, to take refuge in Nova Scotia. One of Whitehead ('ornell's grandsons is John B. Cornell, now for many years the head of the well-known iron-works of New York. John Cornell, of Cowneck, another son of Thomas Cornell, of Cnrnell's Neck, and the ancestor of the Scaredale Cornells, had been in Dartmouth, Massjichusetts, perhaps also on the Penobscot, but came in lii7C, with his wife, JIary Russell, and several small children, to Hempstead, under {he priitection of Governor Andros, having been driven, the records say, from his home in the East by the Indians. This was the date of King Philip's War. Governor .\ndros granted to John Cornell, in l('i77, a tract of land on Manhassett B.iy, a couple uf miles south of Sanil's Point, on which he spent the remainder of his life, and on which some of his de- scendants are still living. In a sheltered valley of his grant, John Cor- nell set apart a burial plot, where are interred the remains of himself and of his wife and of umuy of their descendants. His children were: 1. Richaixl of Scai-sdale, born 11170; married Hannah Thome. 2. Joshua, married Sarah Thorne. 3. JIary, born 1679 ; married James Sands. 4. John born lO.Sl ; married Mary Starr. .'>. Caleb, born 1683 ; married ElizaV>eth Hagner. 6. Rebecca, married Starr. John of Cowneck, always wrote his name Cornwell, and many of his descendants still retain that form. The name of Richard of Rockaway was often written Cornhill, and these forms, as well as Cornwall, Cornell «nd some others, appear on the tombstones in the family burial plot. ried, in 1701, Hannah Thorne, of Flushing, and brought her andtheirten children to Scarsdale in 1727. He early became a Friend, and most of his descend- ants have been of that faith. Friends had settled early in Scarsdale, and the " Mamaroneck Meeting- hou.se" is now within tlie Scarsdale borders. Richard Cornell was a diligent and prosperous man, and his will, dated in 175*), divides among his children much land in Scarsdale, Mamaroneck, and New Rochelle, besides other property and slaves. For even Friends then held slaves, although intiuences were already at work which abolished slavery in the Society before the American declaration of the inalienable right to lib- erty in 1776, and even required Friends to continue to maintain the negroes who had grown old or infirm ill their service. Richard Cornell, the patriarch of Of Scarsdale, jE.80, born 1761, died 1841. lii.'j family in Scarsdale, like the ancient patriarch, had a special regard for his "youngest son Benjamin," and his will, after providing him a competence, adds the special bequest, "to my son Benjamin, my Clock." Richard, Jr., the eldest sou of the first Richard The early English name was written Cornewall. Two generations he- fore Thomas, ofCornell's Neck, " Richard Cornewall, Citizen and Skynner of London " (as it stands in his will), who died in 1.58."), left a portion of the wealth he had made in hides to found and endow "a free grammar .Scholeiu New Woodstock, the town where 1 wits born," and the school stands there yet, near the handsome church of Woodstock. Some of the English branches of the family still write the name Cornewall. Burke's " Landed Gentry of Great Britain " gives two branches, the senior one writing Cornewall and the other Cornwall. Burke's " Peerage and Bar- onetage" adds a third branch, a family of Baronets in Hereford, who retain Cornewall, and Burke traces the lineage of the whole family up through the Barons ofBurford to Rii hardde Cornewall, son of Richard, Earl of Cornewall, second son of King .John, younger brother of Richard Cieur de Lion. Richard long remaiued^a family name. 67(5 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Cornell, of Scarsdale, was born in 1708. He settled near his father and has had many descendants, es- teemed among their neighbors in Scarsdale and else- where. One of them, Thomas Cornell, now of Ron- dout, born in White Plains in 1814, removed to Ulster County, where he was elected, in 1866, to the Fortieth Congress of the United States, and in 1880, to the Forty-seventh Congress, in each case a Republican elected by a large majority in a strongly Democratic district. He is president of the First National Bank of Rondout, of the Cornell Steamboat Company, etc., and has long been prominent in political and finan- cial circles.' ' The four sons and six daughters of the first Richard Cornell, of Scars- dale, were as follows : I. Mary, born at Cowneck, 1703, died 1762 ; married Kev. Henry Sands. II. Deborah, born at Cowneck, 1705, died 1772; married Matthew Franklin, a Quaker preacher. III. Richard Cornell, .Ir., born 1708 ; married Mary Ferris, and had Peter of Maniamneck, born 1732, died 1765, married 1751. Sarah Haviland, born 1734, died 1787, and had : First— Mary, born 1753; married Nathan Palmer and had many descendants. - Second — Thomas of Scarsdale, born 1754, died 1817. His name often appears among the town otRcers of Scars- dale. He married, 1779, Hannah Lynch, born 1762, died 1813, and had : (1.) Peter, named after his grandfather, born 1780 ; married Margaret Gedney, and had : (a.) JohnG., born 1812, died 1834. (b.) Thomas Cornell, of Bondout, born 1814 ; maiTied Catharine Ann Woodniancie — member of Congress etc., named in above text, (c.) Hannah, born 1816. (d.) Nathaniel, born 1818. (c.) Anthony, b«rn 1820. (/.) Elizabeth. (g.) Mary, born 1824. (h.) Charlotte, born 1826. (i.) Margaret, born 1828. (2.) Sarah, born 1782 ; married John Bates and had many children. (3.) Hester, born 1787 ; married Timothy Haviland. (4.) Samuel, born 17y2, died 1823. (5.) Thomas Lynch Cornell, who changed his name to Thomas Wildey Cornell, born 1802, died 1884 ; married Kmeline Lawrence, of Tarry- town, and removed to Ulster County, where he acquired wealth and position. Third — Richard, born 1700 ; married 1st, Elizabeth Ange- Tine ; married 2d, Ann Purdy. Fourth — Ebene/.er, born 1701, died 1794 ; married Elizabeth Purdy. Fifth — Haviland, born 1764 ; married Ist, Marj' Gale ; mar- ried 2d, Lavinia Storms — left several children. IV. Joseph, born in Cowneck, 1708, died 1770 ; married, 1734, Phebe Ferris, daughter of I'eter Ferris, and had : First — Joseph, of Slamaroneck, who married Sarah Hadden and had ; Susannah, born 1757; married Newberry Fowler. Deborah, born 1700 ; married John Fowler. Richard, born 1762, died 1795. Jonathan, born 1764, died 1834 ; married 1st. Lydia Carpenter ; married 2d, Jemima Acker, and left several children. Willett, born 1770 ; married Mary Cock«, and had a number of descendants. Second — Hannah, born 1736 ; married James Fowler. Third— Richard, born 1738 ; died a child. Fourth — Sarah. Fifth — Mary, born 1741 ; married Jonathan Merritt. The second son, Joseph, also left many descendants. The third son, John, lived to be sixty years old, but left no issue. The youngest son, Benjamin, above men- tioned, married in 1743, Abigail Stevenson, and, like Sixth — John, of Maniaroneck, born 1743, died 1817 ; mar- ried Alice Williams, and left Isaac, born 17(17, died 1832, who married Sarah Bennett, and had a number of chil- dren ; and John L., born 1781, who married 1st, Marga- ret Williams; married 2d, Hannah Anderson, and left a family. Seventh — Ferris Cornell, born 1748, whose name appears among the officers of the manor. He married 1st, Anne Cornell ; married 2d, Hannah Quimby ; married 3d, Sarah Cox, and left Thomas I , born 1779; married 1st, Amy Fisher ; married 2d, Gulielma Wood, and had sev- eral children — and Samuel, born 1782 ; married Martha Bonnett, and left a family. V. Hannah, born 1711 ; married Joshua Quimby. VI. Phebe, born 1715 ; married Ebenezer HaWland. VII. John, born 1717 ; died 1781, without issue. VIII. Rebecca, born 1718 ; married Edward Burling. IX. Elizabeth, born 1720, died 179.5 ; married Ist, Aaron Palmer; married 2d, .\aron Quimby. X. Benjamin, born 1723, died 1771 ; married 17th of 9th month, 1742, Abigail Stephenson, daughter of Stephen Stephenson, of Rye, and Jane Clement, of Flushing, his wife, and had : First — Hannah, born 1774 : nuirried John Burling. Second — Jane, born 1746 ; married Joseph GriUcn. Third — Stephen Cornell, of Maniaroneck, born 1749, died 1802. His name also appears among the officers of the manor about the time of the Revolution, and later. He married Margaret Haviland, and had : 1st. William H., born 1776, died 1856 ; married Dorcas Carpenter, daughter of Joseph Carpenter, of Harrison, who represented the county in the New York Legislature in 1796-97. William H. Cor- nell lived near Maniaroneck Meeting-house, in Scarsdale, and had : (o.) Deborah, born 1809 ; married Henry M. Carpenter. (b.) Mary, born 1812 ; married Jacob Miller, (c.) Stephen, born 1815, died 1852 ; married Rachel Tompkins, and left William H., Jr., Charles W. and Albert. (orn 1819 ; married, 1850, Jane K. Bashford, borii 1829, daughter of John and Esther A. (Guion) Bashford, of Yonkers. Seconorn 1794, died 1797. 7tli. Dorcas, born 1796, died 1878 ; married Joseph Arnold. 8th. Thomas Tom, bom 1807, died 182.3. 9th. Mai-y F., born 1809, died 1874 ; married Ed- mund Field. 10th. Benjamin, born 181.3, die Prepared and inserted by the publishers. 678 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. which was for the third time proffered him. His death took place at his home, May 8, 1885. He was connected witli all the laudable enterprises of Scars- dale and was lamented by a large circle of acquaint- ances and friends. His son, and only child, Chancey T. Secor, still lives 'at the old homestead and is its owner. He is a prom- inent Democrat, and was formerly justice of the peace in Scarsdale. For three years he has held the office of supervisor. The family from which Green Wright ^ is descended were early settlers in Putnam County, N. Y. His grandfather, Caleb Wright, a resident of Carmel, mar- ried Mary Cunningham. Their children were Sarah, wife of David Travvis ; Polly, wife of Budd Sloat ; Eunice A., wife of Newell Bayley ; Green, Stephen T. and Gilbert. Gilbert married Eliza, daughter of Solomon Wright, and they were the parents of ten children — Green ; Eliza- beth, wife of Lewis Trav- vis; David; Jackson, who married Sarah A. Hall, and is now living at White Plains ; Susan, wife of Ampellas Youmans ; Zil- phia, wife of David Par- ent ; Simon, who married Eliza Hance, and resides in New Y'^ork ; Pheda, wife of Nathaniel Spring- steel ; Amanda, wife of Fletcher Adams ; and Mary A., wife of Fields Hall", of Mount Pleasant. Green Wright was born in Carmel, Putnam Coun- ty, N. Y.. April 24, 1824. Until reaching his twen- tieth year he remained at home with his father, who was a farmer and contrac- tor. Seeking a wider sphere, he then went to Morrisania and commenced business as a contractor, and followed it for many years with great energy and success. In the j)rosecution of this pursuit he entered largely into the building of mason-work, grading streets, excavating rock and building sewers, having very extensive contracts with the Port Morris Company. A very large part of the grading of the streets of Morrisania was done by him. In 1854 he built the dam on Bronx River at West Farms, and, in addition to his public work, performed exten- sive contracts for private individuals, including im- provements on the estates of Colonel Richard M. Hoe, William Fox and many others. The grading 1 Prepared and inserted by the publishers. of Third Avenue was one of the most important of his works. About 1861 he became connected with the Morrisania Steamboat Company, and was made a director in 1876. This company ran freight and pas- senger boats to Fultou Slip, and in 18S1 he purchased the boats and organized the North and East River Steamboat Company the following year. Of this company he was elected president, and still holds the position. The new company runs three boats— the "Morrisania," " Harlem '" and "Shady Side" — and charters boats from other companies. Mr. Wright became an extensive owner of real estate in Morrisania at an early date, his city resi- dence being at One Hundred and Fiftieth Street and Westchester Avenue, where he owns twenty-three lots. He is the possessor of extensive tracts in other portions of the Twentj'- third Ward of New York. His country residence is an extensive farm, east of the post road and near the north bounds of the town of Scarsdale. It is a part of the estate form- erly owned by Thomas Cornell, and the old Cor- nell mansion stood very near the site of the pre- sent elegant residence which was erected by Mr. Wright in 1878. For picturesque elegance this is excelled by few places in the county. As a man of business he is well known and respected throughout this section of country, and his skill and ability are attested by his success. He married Elizabeth, daughter of Moses Hall, of Mount Pleasant. They have five children — Moses G. (who married Elizabeth, daughter of Rev. M. D. C. Van Gasbeeck), Sarah A. (deceased), Gilbert A. (who married Louise, daughter of John Prophet), Etta and Alma. Solomon Wright, mentioned above, married Zilphia, daughter of Elisha Baldwin, whose family are very prominent in Putnam County. Their children were Baldwin, Eliza (who married Gilbert Wright). Mary, Emiline, Elisha, Cornell and William, who is now living in Putnam County. At the age of seventy, Solomon Wright, with three of his sons and one daughter, removed to Illinois and settled near Elgin. The Hall Family.— William Hall, whose ances- tors are said to have been of Dutch origin, was an old resident of Mount Pleasant, and a tenant of a farm in I 1 SCARSDALE. (iT9 the Manor of Phillipsburg, which ht3 afterwards pur- chased. His son, Isaac Hall, wlio married Klizabeth Fields, was the father of Moses Fields, who married Mahala Fowler. Their children were Nathaniel F., Tamar J., Sarah A., Aaron, Daniel, Mary A. and Elizabeth, who married Green Wright, as mentioned above. The old homestead of the Hall family is now owned by Fields Hall (brother of Moses Hall), and his son Jackson is now of the fourth generation on the inheritance. About a half-mile from the northern limit of the town, and just west of the post road, among a group of trees, stands a pleasant old house dating from the end of the last century. This was formerly the resi- dence of George Washington Tompkins, a brother of Governor Tompkins, who built the mansion in 1799, and here was born his son, Warren Tompkins, after- ward a resident of White Plains. In 1802 the build- ing came into the possession of the Rev. George Don- ovan, elsewhere mentioned in connection with the public school. The homestead is now occupied by the venerable Mrs. McCabe, a daughter of the former, together with several of her family, — two daughters and a son, John D. McCabe, well known in the town. Mrs. McCabe has lived in the tow'n, always occupying her present residence, since 1802, and although now in her eighty-fifth year, is possessed of an excellent memory and relates many events of interest connected with the early history of the town. Mr. McCabe has for many years been prominent in the affairs of the town, especially in connection with the manage- ment of the school, of which he has for some years been commissioner, besides holding other offices. In the vicinity of this house have been found a few relics of the former Indian proprietors, — arrow-heads and the remains of their primitive utensils — as well as some relics of the Revolutionary War. About half a mile to the southeast of the McCabe mansion, and at the top of Fish's Hill, on the Mani- aroneck road, stands another building of an even earlier date, having been erected prior to the Revolu- tion. For a short time during this war it was occu- pied by General Sir William Howe as his headquar- ters, and near by are the graves of several of the British who died at this time. Since the war the house ha.s been successively occupied by Captain De Kay, a Mr. Sherbrooke and the late William H. Fish. The first-named lived here in the early part of the century, and met with a tragic end at the old mill near the station. A lover of fishing, he was accus- tomed to pursue the sport in that neighborhood, and on the day of his death he had wandered to the old mill, and was sitting upon the dam with his pole, when, by some mischance, he fell from his position to the rocks below, dying shortly thereafter. After him came Mr. Sherbrooke, an eccentric old gentleman, whose constant companion in the ancient house was a fine large dog, who accompanied him everywhere. About the year 1850 the house passed into the hands of Mr. Fish, who made his home there until his death, in 187o, and from that date till 188o the mansion was occupied by his widow and family — now, however, no longer residents of the town. On the crest of the hill just south of the school- house, and to the west of the old post road, stands the Sedgwick house, now the residence of Bernard Tone, but before the Revolution occupied by Jona- than Gritlin, and celebrated as the place where was held the first town-meeting under the new govern- ment of the country in the year 1783. The house has been changed very much of late years, but still preserves in part its original shape and appearance. It stands very near to the road, surrounded by tall locusts and in the midst of pleasant lawns, presenting a picturesque appearance. Upon the death of Jona- than Griffin, Jonathan G. Tompkins, his adopted son and father of Daniel D. Tompkins, moved thither from his old mansion, which was subsequently torn down, and made it his home until his death, when it passed into the hands of the Sedgwick family. Just west of this, and within a stone's throw of it, stands " Maplehurst," the residence of the late Ben- jamin F. Butler, originally part of Fox Meadow. The mansion, formerly known as the Travis house, was built about the year 1840. The original building was enlarged shortly after it came into the hands of Mr. Butler, in 1868, and again in 1873, when a large octagonal extension was added. Mr. Butler was one of the comparatively new residents of the town, having made it his home in 1867, and the only town office held by him was that of member of the committee on the new school building. Directly adjoining this residence on the south is the large estate of Charles Butler, an uncle of the preceding, known as the " Fox Meadows," which has so often been mentioned in the town's history. Mr. Butler first made the town his home in 1853, purchasing the original " Fox Meadows " from the heirs of Caleb Tompkins, and ha* since added largely to its extent by the purchase of the Travis farm on the north and part of the Varian farm on the south. Previous to this the Vail house, which stood in the midst of a locust grove about midway up the hill, and celebrated as the birth-place of trovernor Tomp- kins, had been entirely disma'ntled and nothing but the foundations now remain to mark the spot, and they are almost gone from sight. The old roadway, however, still remains, now all grass-grown, and near it a small clear spring, — the scene of the death of one of the old-time school-masters. At the time of the purchase of the estate by Mr. Butler the residence of Caleb Tompkins stood on the rising ground, just west of the site of the old Vail house. This mansion was almost entirely remodeled and rebuilt in 1869, and little remains of the original structure. The present estate of " Fox Meadows" includes nearly four hun- dred acres, and extends from the post road to the ' Bronx, and from the Sedgwick property on the north 680 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. to the Popham estates on the south. Much of the estate was swamp and marsh when Mr. Butler made his purchase, but nearly all has been reclaimed and the whole estate laid out and beautified with great taste. There are large lawns surrounded with many stately trees and for nearly a mile along the bank of the river Bronx stretch many acres of woodland, through which run several small tributary streams*, and a beautiful drive is thus afforded entirely within the lim- its of the estate. The " Fox Meadow Garden " ocejipies the low land facing the post road and is very pictur- esque, with its many long graperies and flower-beds and well-kept lawns and shrubberies. It is an inter- esting coincidence that the "Fox Meadows" should now be occupied by a brother of the late Hon. Ben- jamin F. Butler, Attorney-General of the United States under Presidents Jackson and Van Buren, who was one of Vice-President Tompkins' most intimate and valued friends. Just previous to the purchase of the estate, in 18.53, the mansion of Caleb Tompkins was occupied by his son, Jonathan G. Tompkins, grandson of the former J. G. Tompkins, who, like his grandfather, was prominent in the town, occupying the office of supervisor during the years 1847 and 1848. Adjoining the "Fox Meadows " on the south is the "Locusts," for almost a century the residence of the late William Sherbrooke Popham and his youngest son, Lewis C. Popham, who now occupies the homestead. The mansion was built in 1784 by William Popham, Sr., who made it his home, with the exception of a few years sjjent in the city of New York, until 1835, since which date his son and grand- son have resided here. The mansion stands a few rods west of the post road, in a small valley surround- ed by a grove of locusts, being a few hundred feet south of the Varian tavern. The edifice is one of the most picturesque in appearance and location of any in the town, and, although it has passed its century of existence, still stands almost unchanged, an excel- lent example of the thorough building of the hist century. Both within and without the old mansion is charming in its suggestions of the early days of our national life, and with its near neighbors, the Varian and the Morris homesteads, forms a picture vividly remindful of the past. Adjacent to the Popham estate on the north, and ex- tending north along the old psst road, as far as the southern line of the Tompkins farm, was, in former days, the property of the Varian family. The house, now known as the Wayside Cottage, is one of the oldest in the town, dating from a period jirior to the Revolution, and, although considerable additions have of late years been made to it, the old part has changed in no essential particular. It stands in the shade of several handsome trees, close to the road, at the very southeast corner of the property, and was built and owned by a farmer, Haddon by name, from whom it passed into the hands of the Varians. During the Revolution it was occupied by James and Michael Varian, who, with their brothers, Richard and Isaac, were actively engaged on the patriot side. When the British army moved towards White Plains, in Octo- ber, 1776, from their landing near New Rochelle, the Varians, hoping to secure some of their possessions from plunder, removed a favorite cow from her stable — on a level with the road and under the main roof — to the cellar for safe-keeping. When the British came up, those in search of plunder effected an en- trance into the house by hacking at the door with their sabres and afterward in the same way got into the cow-stable, only to find the cow gone. Tradition has it that at this moment the unfortunate cow "lowed," thus disclosing her hiding-place, but in point of fact, the cow, and the family Bible, which was likewise hid in the cellar, escaped observation and were preserved for their owners. It is an interest- ing fact that the sabre-marks of the British are still to be seen in the woodwork of both the front-door of the house and the door to the stable — vivid reminders of the depredations practiced in the Neutral Ground. After the war the house and estate passed into the hands of Colonel Jonathan Varian, who also brought credit upon the family by his services in the War of 1812, and for many years he kept there an inn. Just south of the house stood a large barn, under which was driven the mail-coach, while the stop was made on its way to the city. This tavern was the favorite resort of the drovers, who, with their cattle, made there the last stop on their journey from the Ohio towns to New York City. Arriving at the Varian farm, they would turn their droves of several hundred head of cattle out to graze and themselves would rest at the tavern for several days, making their sales with the dealers, who would drive out from the city and select their purchases. Then, after this interval of rest, the cattle, much improved after their long march, would be driven directly to their various destinations by their new owners. The pastures of the tavern ex- tended to the north and west of the house, and until of late years the barns, in which were stored large quantities of fodder for the droves, stood, a-s of old, to the west of the tavern itself.' ' The following extract from a letter in the New York Evening Potl for December 0, 1879, is of interest in connection with the Varian family : " In the good keeping of Dr. William Varian, of Kingsbridge, New York City, is now, and has long been, the ancisnt'faniily Bible of his ancestors, the Varians of Westchester County, New York, the proud lot of which was to lie preserved, uninjured, through the War of the Revo- lution, by being buried in the cellar of their dwelling-house, the old resi- dence in the town of Scarsdale, near the former Morris and I'opham Es- tates, still standing, and occupied by a Viirian. Although being much exposed (the family being patriotic) to the depredations of British sol- diens, and especially of the ' cow-boys ' — those notorious brigands of the period, so well described in Cooper's 'Spy ' and Bolton's ' Historj- of Westchester County " — this farm-house escaped both the torch and their pillage, and the dark cellar at the dawn of peace, true to its trust, de- livered up the remarkable volume as good ii3 ever, to be the household companion of subsequent generations, whose names are registered there- in. This ancient Emjlish Bible is a large folio, with thick embossed lids, fitted originally with clasps, and bears the date 1715 on the title page, but not the name of the place where it was published. Strangely, too, SCARSDALE. 681 Just below the Varian cottage, and close by the roadside, stands an ancient mile-stone, dating many years back, and being one of the •few antiquities of the town. Its inscription, still (juito legible, is as follows: "XXI Miles to N. York, 177a." A short distance southwest of the Episcopal Church stands a spacious stone mansion, formerly the resi- dence of (Jeorge Nelson, supervisor of the town in the year 1867, now occupied by Henry W. Bates. This mansion was built about a quarter of a century ago by the father of the Rev. Dr. Olssen, for many years rector of the parish, and is one of the two stone resi- dences in the town. The only other one is the former residence of the late PMward Nelson, brother of the preceding, and is now occupied by Charles P. Crane, a lawyer practicing in New York City. The mansion is a spacious structure, with turreted tower on the southeast corner and broad verandas on the south and west, and stands among a number of handsome trees, on the north side of the back road to Scarsdalc Station, at some distance from the road. On the Mamaroneck road, about quarter of a mile beyond the Fish mansion, stands the residence of Dr. Alexander M. Hruen, built uj)on the site of what was formerly known as " Cooper's Folly." The latter was at one time the residence of the famous novelist, Jas. Fenimore Cooper, who lived within the township for a few years, but never made it his permanent resi- dence. The above name was given to it by the towns- people, from the peculiar nature of its architecture and the wretchedness of the workmanship. In its general appearance it resembled the typical Swiss chalet, and the timber ,of which it was composed was so unseasoned and so poorly put together that the house had to be taken down within a few years of its erection. The novelist resided here ibr about three years after the date of "building the house, 1840, and upon his departure the property passed into the hands of Dr. Brucn, who, upon the same site as "Cooper's Folly," built the present large mansion. Just north of this stood, till within a few years, a small, weather- beaten cottage of two stories and steep, pitched roof, wliere, it is reported. Cooper wrote the "Spy," his famous novel, the scene of which is the "Neutral (iround" of the Revolution, of which Scarsdale formed a i)art. About eight years ago this cottage was torn down to make way for the large and more i)retentious dwelling which occu[)ies a site close by, and is the residence of Green Wright. But a few rods from Hartsdale Station, and just within the town limits, stands a peculiar mansion, which ha-s long been an object of wonder to many, and which is, perhaps, the most unique structure in the illustrative piitures, of whic h there are several, are explained in the Dutch language." 64 the town. This was built for a residence, by the pro- prietor of the powder-works before mentioned, about the year 1847, and is now occupied in connection with the lithographic works near by. The building is sit- uated on the steep hill-side in such a manner that, although it presents two stories in front, behind the roof barely comes above the top of the terrace. The material is stone or brick, stuccoed and whitewashed. The building is of two full stories, nearly square in plan, with flat roof, on which is a stpiare cupola, with a minaret surmounting the whole. The front is deeply recessed to form the porch or veranda, which is two stories and sup|>orted by large round pillars. On either side of the building the hillside is terraced and an avenue of shade-trees extends from the main road to the front door. Altogether the building closely approaches the Tuscan style of architecture and presents an appearance of much greater antiquity than really belongs to it. Nearly opposite " Fox Meadow Gardens," on the post road, stands the residence of George Burgess, who, with his lamily, settled in the town about thirty years ago. This is an interesting old mansion, built in an old-fashioned, rambling style, and surrounded by shade-trees, while to the north and northeast extend the farm lands of the owner. Another interesting mansion is " Rowsley," formerly the property of William B. Lang. This stands on the north side of the road which runs eastward from the post road from " Drake's Corner," surrounded by handsome lawns and shaded by beautiful trees. The house is a long and roomy structure, but of only two stories, the uj)per of which is in tiie mansard roof A wide veran- dah skirts the mansion on the east, south and part of the west side, and is covered with creeping plants and vines. One room in particular is especially in- teresting as being an exact counterpart of one of the rooms of the famous Cliiny Palace in France. This room has a large tiled fireplace on the north, opposite the entrance, while on either side of the room are large windows filled with diamond-shaped panes. The floors, walls and raftered ceiling are of polished oak or similar wood, and, together with the mail-clad figures which stand on either side of the fireplace and the ancient furniture and hangings, they lend to the room a quaint appearance, very suggestive of past centuries. Early Mails and Traveling Facilities — Noted Localities, Etc. — At the beginning of the present century the mail and traveling facilities of the town were of the most ])rimitive kind. Of regular stage lines there were none, while the nuiil service was limited to a single trip each way during the week. The mail was carried to and fro in saddle-bags by an old man, Calhoun by name, mounted upon a small horse, the down trip being made on Wednes- day and the return on Friday. The route at this time was from New York City to Danbury, Conn. Thus the service remained until about 1810, when, in- 682 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. stead of on horseback, the mail was transported in a small box-wagon with an arched canvas top, drawn by a single horse. This was in turn superseded by a more suitable conveyance drawn by a pair of horses, and finally this gave way to the regular old-fashioned mail-coach, with its four horses and the typical guard tooting upon his long horn. At this time the service had been increased to a trip each way every day, the coach going down to the city in the morning and re- turning at night, the route being from New York to North Castle, with a change of horses at White Plains. The stopping-place of the coach in Scarsdale was the Varian Tavern, where the coach drew up at the large barn which formerly stood just to the side of the tavern proper. In these early days of the repub- lic, private as well as public conveyances were few in the town, the respectable vehicles in Scarsdale num- bering but three. These were in the possession, re- spectively, of the Pophara, Tompkins and McCabe families, and the impression made by them upon the rustic minds of the population was not inconsiderable. The route of the mail-coach through the town lay along the old " Boston turnpike," or post road, which is about half a mile from the railroad and nearly par- allel with it. This has always been the main thor- oughfare of the town, and until its doubtful improve- ment at the hands of the Tweed ring of New York City, in 1872, it was a pleasant and well-shaded country road. In that year the road was broadened, leveled and straightened so as to retain little of its former attractiveness, but the past few years have done much to cover up the traces of the improving hands of thirteen years ago. At this time a short cut was made for the road around the foot of the hill on which were situated the Griffin and Tompkins farms, and a portion of the old road was thus left, which runs over the hill and past the site of the birth-place of Governor Tompkins, the present resi- dence of Charles Butler, at the " Fox Meadows, " Mapleliurst," formerly on the "Trayis" farm, and the old Griffin and Fisher homesteads, until it again joins with the main road at a point just north of tlie public school. The principal oft'shoots of this road are as follows: At the northern i)art of its course through the town, the Mamaroneck road, on which are the Fish and Bruen mansions, and from which turn oft' the "Saxton Woods " road, running in a northeasterly direction ; and "Lincoln Avenue," on which, at almost the very limits of the town, stands the Friends' Meeting- House ; and at the southern part of its course, a road running to the eastward, past the Drake and Lang mansions ; and just south of this, the " Scarsdale depot road," running westward, on which are the old Morris homestead and, near by, the Church of St. James the Less. On this road and just opposite the Morris mansion took place in the time of the Revolu- tion the tragic event described in Bolton's history of the county. It seems that an officer of the French cavalry, accompanied by several companions, went one Sunday to the smithy of Gilbert Vincent to have his horse shod. A sou of the smith, alone, was at the house, and he refused to perform the work, partly from religious scruples and also on the ground of lacking the necessary fuel for the forge. The officer, thinking this merely a pretext, or that he was unwil- ling to do the enemy a service, provoked a quarrel with the young man, which ended in the death of young Vincent. To quote from Bolton : " When his brother, Elijah Vincent, who belonged to De Lancey's refugee corps, heard of the outrage, he vowed revenge on the murderer, and the better to accomplish his purpose, determined to lay in wait and watch the French scoutiug parties as they passed to and fro from Scarsdale to their encampment on the Green- burgh hills. For several nights he watched in vain, but at length the opportune moment for revenge ar- rived. It so happened that a party of the Duke of Lauzun's patrols were piissing the very spot where Vincent lay concealed behind the bushes. He im- mediately rose and fired upon the unsusi)ecting com- pany, and a captain of the Hussars fell from his horse, mortally wounded." Vincent made his escape and finally went to Canada, where he died. Within a few feet of this spot, and at the bottom of a small valley, the road crosses a little stream. Here, on one side of the road, is a quicksand of unknown depth, which has remained until the i)rescnt day, not- withstanding rejieated attem])ts to fill it up, and into this unfortunate cattle have from time to time strayed and been rescued only with difficulty. On the road to New Rochelle, and just beyond "Castle Cosy," formerly the residence of the late George M. Wheeler, there is another small brook, known as the "Hutchinson," a bratich of the Ma- maroneck River, and this is spanned by a small wooden bridge. Just at this point the road is closely bordered on either side by dense thickets and small trees, making it rather a lonely spot, and the story in the town is that many years ago a pedlar was waylaid here one dismal night and murdered for his money. There seems to be no actual record of this deed of blood, but the bridge is known as the " Pedlar's Bridge" from the circumstances of the story. Another legendary tale in which Scarsdale takes much pride is that, during the Revolution, one of the British generals, presumably Sir William Howe, hearing of the existence of the Bronx and imagining it to be navigable, ordered the coinnninder of the fleet, then lying at New York, to sail up the river in time to ]iarticipate in the battle of White Plains. As the depth of the river at no point in its course along the border of the town was much over three feet, the humor of the legend may be ajjpreciated by all. The following poem, from the pen of William A. Butler, the poet, appeared in the Scarsdale Gleaner during the summer of 1875, and fitly expresses the state of the case : ■t i i SCARSDALE. G83 " After rockets, and liliie-liglitK, ami so forth, ( In the iiiglit of the glorious Fourth, At Miiihiight I tliought I would go forth To the Bronx, fairest stream of the North ; There I met the old naval commander (Or his ghost), in a shocking bad hat, Who was onlereil up hero to meander With his fleet, and his guns, and all that ; He stoiKl where the water was w ettest — It almost came over his shoes — And he cried. Ml my 5H)ul that regrettcst The glory the Kates did refuse. What a mercy to all these Scarsdalers — That they in this stream couldn't lie; For at once with my frigates ami sailors I had blown their rebellion sky-high, When these shores, which I now have my eye on. Had been fuller of saii-s ' than of 'dales,' And the unicorn here, and the lion. Would have roared and erected their tails. where this tine sylvan dra|iery, tir these villas of woiiderfid shajK', Or hot house, or gi cen-liouee, or grapery. Had they once got a taste of my gnijie'! Btii-ause Washington pulle«l at their trigger They fancy 'twas up w ith our jig, But if only the Bronx had been bigger, Then hers had not been so big,' 'Then, iiuoth I, ' this old salt should bo throttled, If his long yarn is false, as methinks. But if true then the Bronx should be Ijottled To mix with Centennial drinks ! " Another statement, presumably not a legend, in which Scarsdale can justly take great pride, and which is vouched for by excellent authority, is "that no Scarsdale-born person was ever in jail or the poor- house." Considering that the town has had a corpo- rate existence of over a century, this indeed may be a source of just satisfaction to all the inhabitants. Scarsdale Station. — At the extreme southern portion of the western border of the town the tracks of the Harlem Railroad run within the town limits for about a quarter of a mile, and here, just where the road to Ashford and Dobbs Ferry crosses the line, is situated Scarsdale Station. The building is a frame structure of two stories, with a steep-pitched roof. On the lower floor is a large waiting-room, with ticket and post-office adjoining, while beyond is a freight-room. The building has not been materially altered in its external appearance for many years, but within it has been gradually improved from time to time. The station stands to the west of the line, and near by is the residence of the station-master, one of the celebrities of the town, who has held his position for more than twenty years. The Harlem Railroad wiis extended slowly from its original termi- nus at Harlem until it reached Tuckahoe, the station next below Scarsdale, and in 1847 it was finally pushed through to White Plains. At this time it was but a single track line, and there was no station within the town. In consideration, however, of the fact that the company had been given the land re- quired for its roadway through the Popham estate, a platform was built on the grounds of the family, just below the railroad bridge, and trains were stopjied here on signal to receive or land mcmbei's of the Pop- ham family. After a few years a signal station was estiiblished in nearly the present location and in the "sixties" the road was double-tracked a.s far as White Plains, and its course through the town slightly altered. The distance by the railroad from New York to Scarsdale is eighteen miles, and not many years ago the running time of the " way " trains was a full hour. Of late years a slight improvement has been made in this respect, and the "way" time is now slightly over fifty minutes, while the "express" time is thirty-six minutes. In former days the service on the road was very limited, Scarsdale being ranked merely as a way station ; but in 1877, after strong efforts on the part of those citizens who did busine.ss in New York, Scarsdale was made a stopping-{)lace for the morning express south and the evening ex- press north, while during the summer still another express stops here on each trip. Besides this, the way service has been improved in time and frequency, and of the fifteen trains that pass each way daily, thirteen stop at Scarsdale, of which two are express trains. The rate of fare was for many years exorbi- tant, being fifty-five cents for a single trip and no ex- cursion tickets issued ; but in 1878 a reduction of ten cents was made in the single fare ; excursion tickets were issued, good for three days, for eighty-five cents and within the last year the time of these has been extended to fifteen days. Commutation tickets, good for a year and allowing for two trips each week-day, are sold for sixty-five doUai-s. The number of com- muters from Scarsdale varies from fifteen to twenty- five, and there is, besides, a considerable number of transient passengers. As there are no manufacturing interests in the town, the freight traffic is entirely local, and although formerly a considerable quantity of milk was daily sent to the city over the line, the high freight charges have caused this to be diverted I from the railroad, and it is now carried to the city by :i daily wagon service. Recent Town History. — In the year 1878 the town was visited by the most severe wind and rain- storm ever known in the county, which, indeed, al- most amounted to a tornado. This occurred on the afternoon of Sunday, July 20th, and although lasting barely over four or five minutes, did a great amount of damage. The path of the storm lay almost directly from west to east, and although the houses in its track escaped with merely the lossof blinds and other trifling damage, many beautiful and valuable fruit and shade- trees were laid low. The scene in the path of the ] storm was almost indescribable, the sky being of a j dark leaden hue, the atmosphere thick with torrents of rain and hail, and in the midst of this huge trees reeling and swirling round in the furious wind and then falling with a terrific crash of boughs, while in all directions were flying fragments of light timber and indeed of anything that lay in the storm's track. On the "Fox Meadow" farm alone over five hundred 684 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. fine trees were destroyed, while on other estates the damage, though less, was nevertheless considerable. The storm ceased about as suddenly as it had begun, and in a few minutes the afternoon sun shone glori- ously upon the dripping and tangled masses of debris that lay scattered everywhere in the path of the storm. In the year 1882 an innovation occurred in the extension to Scarsdale of the lines of the West- chester Telephone Company from White Plains as centre. Up to 1885 the subscribers in the town numbered but five, but a new central office for Hartsdale, Scarsdale and Tuckahoe has been started at the Hartsdale Station, with over twenty-five sub" scribers, most of them within the town of Scarsdale. It is only within late years, also, that Scarsdale has possessed telegraphic facilities. In 1881 the Western Union Telegraph Company established a testing station for their lines on the Scarsdale bank of the Bronx, within a stone's throw of Scarsdale Station. To this run nearly a hundred wires from all parts of the surrounding country and here is estab- lished a public telegraph office. Although so sparsely settled, Scarsdale has been visited by several severe fires, which have invariably run their course, the facilities for fighting them being entirely wanting. In 18()3 the old mill which had stood for more than a century just above Scarsdale Station, on the Bronx, was totally destroyed by fire, nothing but the foundations and a few fragments of machinery remaining, and no attempts at rebuilding have since been made. In the fall of 1874 the resi- dence of Benjamin Carpenter, on the high ridge to the east of the post road, was set on fire by an incendiary, and in a short time was burned to the ground, together with numerous out-buildings and barns and some live-stock. Some years after this a house of considerable size, which stood close by Scarsdale Station, on the Popham estate, at one time the residence of Robert C. and afterward of his brother, Lewis C. Popham, was totally destroyed by fire, nothing but the chimneys and foundations re- maining to mark the dwelling once a familiar land- mark. The last large conflagration in the town was the burning of the pretty little parish church of St. James the Less, which occurred on the evening of Palm Sun- day, 1882. Although the neighborhood was speedily aroused, all efl'orts to save the building proved un- availing, very little of value being saved of the in- side fittings, and soon only the walls and part of the little chapel remained of the church which was so dear to all the inhabitants of the neighboring country. ScARyDALK Lawn Tennis Club. — The only organ- ization of a peculiarly social nature existing in the town is the Scarsdale Lawn Tennis Club, just enter- ing upon its third season. The club was organized early in the spring of 1883, and the first year had a membership of about twenty, — including honorary members. The club had two courts at " Fair View," the residence of Mr. Hamilton, where the members met for practice every Saturday afternoon during the warm months. The season was marked by a handicap tournament open to all the members. In the spring of 1884 the club opened its season with a membership of nearly thirty, ladies being admitted to active membership. The club occupied four courts in Fox Meadow Gardens, which were put at their disposal by Mr. Chai'les Butler. During the year two tourna- ments were held, open to members only, — the first, ladies' singles, and the second, doubles, of a lady and gentleman. The last season was inaugurated on the 7th of June, at the Fox Meadow Gardens, the number of courts having been increased to six and the mem- bership aggregating forty-four. The original officers of the club were : Presulent. Thomas F. Burge.«s. Secrc'lurtj. CORTLANDT FiSlI. Treasurer. James Bleecker, Jr. The officers for 1885 were the following : PresicUitt. Allen M. Butler. Secretary. James Bleei.ker, .Jr. Treasurt-r. II. Granville Butler. The club meets for practice every Saturday after- noon, but the grounds are open for the useof members on any week-day. The routine business of the club is entrusted to a governing committee of seven members, including the officers ex-officio. Altliough of very recent origin, the Scarsdale Tennis Club now forms a prominent feature in the social life of the town, and the scene at the grounds on a bright Saturday after- noon is charming and full of interest. Amatkur Newspaper. — Scarsdale has never been represented by a newspaper of its own except during a few months of the year 1885. In June of that year appeared the first number of T/ie Scars^dale Gleaner, a small four-page monthly, devoted to the interests of the town. This was entirely an amateur enterprise, being printed as well as edited within the limits of the township. Although but a modest undertaking, the Gleaner proved a great success, the circulation amount- ing to more than two hundred copies, and the sub- scription list embracing many outside of the town. With its fifth number the paj)er was obliged to sus- pend publication, owing to circumstances beyond the control of the amateur editors, and so, after a short but highly successful career, the only journalistic attempt on the part of the citizens of the town came to a conclusion. NEW ROCHELLE. 685 CHAPTEE XVI. NEW ROCHELI.E.* BY REV. CHARLES E. LINDSLEY, D.D. The settlement of the Huguenots at New Rochellc is believed to have been begun as early as the year 1686-87, by certain refugees from the town of La llochelle, France. This was the year following the revocation of the Edict of Nantes, by which unjust and impolitic act fifty thousand French families were driven from their homes to other countries. Many of them rted first to England, but subsequently found their way to America. Those who came first to New Rochelle were landed, it is thought, by an English vessel at Bonnefoy's Point, now Davenport's Neck. Their exact number is uncertain, but the names of some of the early settlers are found upon the town records, between the years U'}% and 1710, and are as follows : Allaire. Goiiqeon. Angevin. (iiierin. Jouneau. Boni'cpaA. Lambent. Boiigraiid. Le Ronx. Bonnefoy, Lespinard. Beigiior. Le Villain. Besly. Landrin. Bolts. Lavinge. Boiinett. Le Conut. Huniard. Maclict. Bouteillier. Mastier, Clupp. Mercier. Clttik. Naudin. Oothomieau. Nentiiille. Caillurd. Palcot. Coutaiit (i), Penieau. Das. I*inckney. Devean. Raynean. Funnel. Scurnian. Flundreau. Sycard. Fonrrestier. Thevoulde. Ganyaril. Tiiaunet.j Giiion. Tliauver. Oirand. V el lean. In the year 1710 the population of New Rochelle amounted to two hundred and sixty-one persons, including fifty-seven slaves. This enumeration is from a census of the town supposed to have been taken in that year. The Rev. L. J. Coutant, however, in his sketches of Huguenot New Rochelle, a.sserts that the total number of inhabitants at this time was three hundred and twenty-five. The same gentleman, who, in all that relates to the early liistory of this town is peculiarly well-informed, observes that " the two oldest individuals living in the town at that date, Mary Badeau and Frederick Schureman, were each eighty years old. The family name having the greatest number of representatives (sixteen) was that of Schureman. There were eleven 'Sec reminiscences of New Rocliclle by Rev. AVm. Hague at the end of the chapter on " Pelham." -'See Bolton's Hist. vol. i. p. 670. of the name of Le Doof. The next most numerous family names were those of Guion, Bonnett, Sycard, Frederick, Neff'veillc and Angovine. Of the fifty-four family names existing in the town of New Rochelle when this census of 1710 was taken, only six at the present time survive. These are the Le Counts, Sea- cords, Badeaus, Rcnouds, Bonnetts and Coutants. The rest, forty-eight in number, have all disappeared from the town, either by death or removal, or have been merged by marriage into other family names.'' Many portions of the Huguenot stock came to New Rochelle at a later period. There is a distinct and unbroken tradition, dating back much more than a hundred years, and handed down through several separate families, notably the Guions and Coutants, that the first settlers of the town landed at Bonnefoy's Point. The fact is perhaps as well established as any other not a matter of writ- ten record. An excavation existed, and perhaps still exists, upon that jioint, which from time immemorial has been designated l)y those who should know, as the cellar of the first house ever built in New Rochelle. TIIK CUIOX PLACE, Huguenot Street, New Rochelle. All wc can say is that there are those living now whose great-grandfathers might have helped to dig that cellar. Members of the Guion family have been known to assert that the first child born in the town was born in that house, and was a Guion. In the early division of the town, that part of it now known as Davenport's Neck is designated as Leisler's and Le Count's Neck. It contains about two hundred acres. This neck subsequently became the property and residence of the Lesjjinard family, one of whom came to New Rochelle with the Hugue- nots in 1689. The Lespinard Cemetery is situated on the south side of the Neck and contains several memorials of this fiimily. In 1786 this piece of land was pur- chased by Newbury Davenport, father of the late pro- prietors, Lawrence and Newbury Davenport. Bonnefoy's Point, situated on the northeast side of the Neck, has already been mentioned as the landing- place of the Huguenots, about 1689. A very differ- ent landing was made there on the 22d of October, 1776. On the 18th a huge British fleet had landed rein- 686 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. forcemeiits for the army in New York. There were, in all, seventy-two sail, having on board four thousand Hessians, six thousand Waldeckers, two companies of chasseurs, two hundred English recruits and two thousand baggage horses. The most of these Ger- man troops were at once ordered to join Howe in his march to White Plains. The main body of his army had already crossed from Throg's Neck to Pell's Point, and on the 21st of October was encamped on the Heights, north of the village of New Rochelle, Howe's headquarters being at a house on the White Plains road, about one mile from the village. On the 22d General Knyphausen landed with the Second Division of German hirelings, on Bonnefoy's orBauf- fet's Point. He encamped his troops the same day on the E. K. Collins place (now Larchmont Manor), and from there joined the main body in time for the battle of the 28th. The one was a landing of peace- ful and persecuted emigrants, seeking in America that religious freedom which was denied them in their native France ; the other, a disembarkation of German mercenaries, nearly a century later, to carry war, plunder and desolation to the homes and hearts running along in a tortuous course, as close to the creek as possible, from the northeastern part of Huguenot Street to the foot of Centre Street, and then to the line of boundary between New Rochelle and Pelham. This road was the way of approach to Bonnefoy^s Point. The farms or lots were narrow and long, — in some places nearly, or quite a mile in length, and, for the most part, not more than one field wide. Some of these retain their original width and length to the present day, while a few have been subdivided, and others, pei"haps, have been doubled, two into one. The road leading from North Street, by the way of the Coutant Cemetery to the Pelham boundary line, which it strikes at what was formerly known as " New- port's Corner," must have been opened at an early period of the settlement of the town, perhaps simul- taneously with the opening of North Street, as it would seem to be the only road in those times north of Huguenot Street by which the town of East Chester could be reached. This road runs in a direct westerly course and was the location of several Huguenot families.' A VIEW OF HITGUENOT STREET, NEW ROCHELLE, IN 1798. Showing the uhl Episciipal church with the district whool-house. of the descendants of the Huguenots, the plunderers and the plundered being of the same religious faith. The village of New Rochelle was situated on a level tract of land, upon the line of the old Boston road, extending from a large \wnd, now drained, but for many years known as the Ice Pond or Crystal Lake, to a point near to where the Presbyterian Church now stands, being about one mile in extent and con- stituting what is known as Huguenot Street. The road Wivs only roughly marked out at first, but avoid- ed the steep hill which had to be surmounted by the present Boston turnpike. In 1693 a road was opened at right angles to Huguenot Street, known as North Street, the same which now extends to Upper New Rochelle. Centre Street was the first road laid out in a direct line from Huguenot Street to the Salt Water, it is be- lieved, and it was on that part of Huguenot Street, between North and Centre, that the Huguenots erected their first dwellings. The land here is dry and level, and is said to be seventy feet above tide- water. Next to Centre, it is reasonable to suppose that the street now called " Cedar Avenue " was opened, The Huguenots " seem to have been an industri- ous and order-loving people." What their worldly circumstances were, might easily be inferred from the persecutions they had suffered and from the precipi- tate manner in which most of them had been com- pelled to abandon their homes and flee to foreign lands. Their means were small, and it was, no doubt, some years before the lands which they acquired were paid for; and even when this was accomplished, by patient toil and frugal management, the problem still remfiined of how to extract a living from their small farms. That they found this a work of no small difliculty, we may conclude from the following letters, written shortly after their arrival. On the 20th of September, 1089, they purchased from John Pell a tract of about six thousand acres, the price for which was not far from one dollar an acre. This was divided into lots on the 20th of November, 1693, by a surveyor ; each occupant paying his just proportion of the total value. The letters, taken from 'These statements as to early localities have been taken, by permis- sion, from an interesting slietch of tlie firat settlement of New Rodielle, by tlie ReT. L. J. Coutant. NEW ROCHELLE 687 acres of land more, which the said Juliii Pell and Rachel, his wife, do freely give and grant for the Frem li rliurili, erected, or to be erected, liy the inlial>ilitnt!i of the said tract of land, or liy their assignees, being but- ted and bounded as herein is after expressed, beginning at the west side of a certain wliito oak tree, marked on all four sides, standing at high water nmrk at the south end of Hog Neck, by shoals, harbour and runs northwesterly through the great fresh meadow lying between the road and the Sound, and from the north side of the said meadow, to run from thencii due north to Bronckes river, which is the west division line iH-tween the said John I'ell's land and the aforesaid tract, bounded on the " Documentary History of the State of New York,'" are as follows : " New Rociiki,i,k 2()th Oct, ICOl). "Sir, — •*««*«»*»«« " Mr. Pinton has delivered me this day, an order to be communicated to the s'l" inhabitants (of New Rochelle), relative to the election and noniinntJon of Vsj^'ssore, t'ollectors anil Commissionei'S, for laying, ini- IMising and receiving Taxes for his Majestis's servuu. The time is very short, since ii is the twenty stn enth inst;uil they must lie at W'chester, but they look forsiime foi'bearance and delay from your goodness, in case, notwithstanding their diligence, they may not be able }Mnirtnally to answiM-. It is not through any unwillingness to exert themselves to meet it, but you know theirstienglh as well as I. Notwithstanding, despite their ixiverty and misery, they will never lack in submission to the orders of his iMujesty, both for the public good and interest. This they protest to me, anil 1 pi"ay you to be pei*suaded thereof. 1 am with resjiect, and pray Uod for your i)rosiK;rity, •' Sir, " Your very huuibtu and very Obedient Servant, V. lioxREr.vs, "Address: a Monsieur de Leistar, Lieut (louveruenr pour le Roy D'Angleterre, du Fort William, a La Noie York." Governor Fletcher arrived in New York on the 2'Jth of August, l()!t2. To him, .soon afterwards, prob- ably iu IG'JH, the inhabitants of New Rochelle ad- dressed the following humble petition: - "ToIIis Excellency, Col. Benjamin Fletcher, Governor in Chief, and Captain General of ye Province of New York and dependencies &c. " The humble petition of ye inhabitants of New Rochelle, Humbly Sheweth. "That your petitioners having been forced by the late pereecutions in France to f'li-sake their country and estates, and flye to ye Protestant Princes. Their iMiyestyes, l)y their proclannitiou of ye 25th of April, lliS'.i, ilid grant them an a/.ile in all their dominions, with their Royall prittection ; Wherefore they were invited to come ami buy lands in this province, to the end that they might by their labour help the uecessityes of their families, and did spend therein all their small store, with the help of their friends, whereof they did borrow great sums of money, having been contpelled to sell for that purpose the things which are nuist necessary for their use. Wherefore your petitioners humbly pray that your Excellency nniy be pleased to take their Case in Serious Con- sideration, and out of charity and pity to graut them for some yeare what help and privileges your E.xceltency shall think Convenient, and your petitioned iu duty bound shall ever pray Ac. "Tii.vi VET Elsi CoTnoNE.n ." The patents of the towns of New Rochelle and Pel- ham are both of them ancient and curious documents, illustrative of the quaint orthography and prodigious legal verbiage of a past age. The following is John Pell's grant of New Rochelle in 1G89: " Til I'll (.'hrMUiH ptoplf to whom this present writing shall come John Pell, proprietor of the Manor of Pelham, within the County of West Chester, in the province of New York, within the dominion of New Englanil, gentleman, and Rachel, his wife, sendetli greeting in our Lord fiod everlasting. Know Yee that the said John I'ell and Rachel, his wife, for and in consideration of the stun of sixteen hunilred anil seventy-five {>ounds and twenty-five shillings sterling, current silver money of this jiroviuce, to him in hand [laid and secured to be paid at the or before the ensealing and the delivery thereof by Jacob Leisler, of the city of Now York, Merchant, the receipt whereof they, the said John Pell and Rachel, his wife, do thereby acknowledge themselves to lie fully i Siilisfied and contented, and thereof, and of every part and parcel there- of do hereby freely and clearly acipiit and Fxhonerate and discharge the Stkid Jacob Leisler, his heirs, e-xecutors, administrators and every of them, by thest; presents have granted, bargained and sold, and by these presents do grant, bargain and sell unto the said Jacob Leisler, his heirs and assignees, all the tract of land lying and being within said Manor of Pelham, containing sLx thousand acres of land and also one hundred ' DiHv Hist. N. Y., vol. ii. p. 304. - Doc. Hist. N. Y., Tul. iii. p. 9:26. the sonth-eiuiterly by the Sound and Salt Water, and to run eiust-ncu th- erly to a certain piece of salt meadow lying at the sjilt creek which run- neth up to Cedar Tree brook, or Gravelly brook, and is the bounds to Southern. Bounded on the east by a line that runs from said meadow north westerly by marked trees, to a certain black oak tree standing a little below the road, marked on four sides, and from thence to run due north four miles and a half, more or less, and from the north side of the said west line, ending at Broncke's river, and from thence to run east- erly till it meets with the north end of the said eastern most boiinils, to- gether with all and singular the islands and the islets before the said tract of land lying and being in the sound and sjilt water, with all the harbors, creeks, rivers, rivulets, runs, waters, lakes, meadows, ponds, marshes, salt and fresh, swamps, soils, timber, trees, pastures, feedings, eiu losures, fields, cpiarriefi, mines, minerals (silver and gold mines only excepted), fishing, hunting, fowling, hawking and also the messuages, houses, tenements, barns, mills, mill dams, as they were at the time of the ensealing and delivery of the articles of agreement of sale for siiid land, bearing clnte the secoiul day of .Inly, in the year of onr Lord one thousand six hundred and eighty seven. As relation being thereto had, doth more fully and at large appear, as also the revi'i-sion and reversions, remainder and remainders of a certain lott of land and meadow novs' in the tenure and occupation of John Jefferd and Olive, his wife, being part of the aforesaid six thousand acres »f land, with all the privileges belonging thereto, or in any wise appertaining or therewith now used, occupied and enjoyed, as all the right, title, interest, reversion, remainder, property, clainie and demand whatsoever, of, iu, and to the same, ami any part thereof as hereafter expressed. " To have and to hold the aforesaid tract of land, with all other the alwve granted premises, unto the sjiid Jacob Leisler, his heirs and as- signs, for ever, to his and their own sole and proper use, benefit and liehoof, for ever yielding and paying unto the said John Pell, his heirs and assigns, lords of the said Manor of Pelham, to the as- signs of him or them, or their or either of them, as an acknowledgment to the lords of the said Manor, one fat calf on every four and twentieth day of June, yearly and every year forever — if demanded. " The Siiid John Pell and R,irhel, his wife, for themselves, their heirs, executors and administrators, respectively, do hereby covenant, promise and grant to and with the Kiid .lacob Leisler, his hell's and assignees, in manner and form follciwiiig, that is to s.iy, at the time of the ensealing hereof, they, the said John Pell and Rachel, his wife, do avouch them- selves to be true, sole and lawful owners of all the aforebargained prem- ises, and that they are lawfully seized of and in the same and every part thereof in their own proixtr right of a gomi and indefinable estiite of in- heritance in fee simple, and have in themselves good right, full power and lawful authority to sidl and dispose of the siimeas aforesaid ; and the s-iid Jacob Leisler, his heirs and assignees, shall and may from hence- forth and forever, |>eaceably, ipiietly, have, hold, occu|iy, possess and en- joy the above granted premises, and every part and parcel thereof, free and clear without any charge or intimidation, caused, made, suffered or granted by said John Pell and Rachel, his wife, or either of them, their or either of their heirs in estate, right, title, interest iu law or equity, trust, charge or other molestation whatsoever. " And the said John Pell, and Rjichel, his wife, for thoin.selves respec- tively and for their respective heirs, do covenant, promise and grant to war- rant and defend the alMive granted promises with their appurtenances and every part ami parcel thereof, luito the sjiid Jacipb Leisler, bis hei|-s and assignees forever, against the lawful charges and demands. In witne.'s whereof, the said John Pell and Rachel, his wife, have liereuulo set their hands and seals in New Y'ork, the twentieth day of September, in the fi:st j-ear of the reign of our sovereign lord and lady, William and Mai7, King and Queen of England, Ac, ic, in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred and eighty-nine. "John Pei.i,. " The JIark of " R.icHEi.— R— Pm.i.. Leisler purchased the lands from Pell for the Hu- 688 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. guenots, to whom he released them as rapidly as pos- sible during the year 1690, preceding the year in which he was executed on a charge of high treason. The township was surveyed and divided into lots or farms on the 20th of November, 1693, by Alexander Allaire, one of the purchasers from Leisler, and Cap- tain Bond, who was a surveyor. ]\IiLiTARY Hi.STORY. — Tile towu of NewRochelle ap- pears to have sufl'ered somewhat during the Revolu- tionary War, althougli by no means so severely as some other parts of the county: " On tlifi 18th of October, 1776, the Biitisli nriny ( ro.ssed tci I'elbaiii Point from Throg's Neck, and niurchiiig northerly, encamped tiie same night on the high ground hetwetm Ilulehinson's River (Kast Cliester Creek) and New Rochelle village, where it remained till the 2Ist. On the 21st the Britisli removed and encamjied on New Rochelle Heights, nortli of the village, and on both sides of the road leading to Scaredale. During the nuircli of the two armies towards White IMains, frequent skirmishes hajiiiened. General Sullivan attacked the vanguard of the British on their road from New Rochelle, and in tlie figlit which cn- Bued, as well as in most of the other smaller engagements, the advantage was with the Americans. " But their greatest troubles befell the inluibitants after the battle at White Plains was over, au TompkiDs' address at White Plains, October 28, 1845. 2 Coutant's " Beminiscences." NEW ROCHELLE. 689 punishment, were lashed to the heels of the soldiers' horses and the animals spurred into violent action, so that the prisoners were dashed about at the peril of their limbs and lives. After this cruel treatment they were compelled to kneel down in the road and repeat after their brutal captors a profane burlesque on the Lord's Prayer. This ceremony ended, they were stripped of their coats, hats and shoes, and left to find their way home as best they could, or, if they preferred it, to return to their merriment in the tav- ern. During the War of 1812 a panic took place among the militia who had been stationed upon Davenport's Neck as a guard against the possible landing of a force from the British men-of-war which were cruis- ing in the Sound. It was a false alarm, but their fright was such that they fled in every direction, taking refuge in the neighboring woods and swamps, and some of them failing to report themselves until many hours had elapsed. This was not a victory to be proud of, nor even a masterly retreat, but when we recall the history in more modern times, of the battle of Bull Run, we will not be too hard on the heroes of Daven- port's Neck. It retjuires time, dis- cipline and, above all, active ser- vice to make soldiers out of the raw material of farmers, mechanics and business men. The rout was not any more complete or disgraceful than at the battle of Camden, South Carolina, where Gates' new levies ran so fast and so far, that some think they are running still. The Paixe Farm and Moxu- MEXT. — Writers upon the history of New Rochelle have usually re- ferred to the fact that the noted Thomas Paine lived here for some time, upon a farm bestowed upon him by the Legislature of the State of New York for his political services during the War of the Revolution. This farm, said to have consisted originally of about tbree hundred acres, was, at the commencement of hostilities, in the possession of one Frederic Deveau, called in the records of the Confiscation Act, Bevoe, by mistake, and styled "Yeoman." As the name in- dicates, he was doubtless a descendant of the Hugue- nots. At the close of the war, being a Tory, his property was confiscated and given to Paine. It was called by some "The Paine Farm " and by others "Mount Paine.'' Thomas Paine came to live upon his property in New Rochelle during the first years of the present century (1801-2). In his " Field-Book of the Revolution,"" Benson J. Lossing, in referring to this monument, 65 speaks of the inscription, "Thomas Paine, Author of Common Sense," as though no other words had been placeil there. If he had taken the trouble to examine more closely, he would have ascertained that his ad- mirers have placed extracts from his work, " The Age of Reason," in the rear. If (as has been stated by those who ought to know) the likeness of Paine placed by his admirers upon the monument is a good one, the one given by Mr. Lossing is not so, for there is very little resemblance of the one to the other. A part of the house in which Paine lived still remains intact, and is thought to be one of the most ancient dwellings in the town. As he died on the 8th of .June, 1809, in New York, Paine could only have lived in New Rochelle four or five years. He was buried in a corner of the Paine THOMAS PAIXE'S MOXUMEXT. farm ; but in the year 1819 the remains were disin- terred by William Cobbett, and conveyed to England. I once mot with an aged man, who informed me that he was living a small boy at the time, in a house almost directly opposite the place where Paine was buried. At a very early hour one morning, when going to the pasture to drive up the cows for milking, he dis- covered several men hard at work digging near the road. He was alarmed and watched them from a dis- tance. They placed something contained in a box, in a wagon, tilled up the empty grave and drove rapidly away. That was the last of the mortal re- mains of the author of "Common Sense" ever seen in this country. What became of them is not known, and probably never will be. They are supjiosed, however, to have been taken by Cobbett to England. 690 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTEE COUNTY. At a much later period a monument was erected near the spot and facing the road to White Plains. There, on the eastern side of the house, is the little sleeping-room, with its antique " Franklin tire-place, over which the arcli infidel warmed his shivering limbs before returning to his bed of straw." During his abode here he was accustomed to make frequent excursions into the surrounding country, calling on the principal families and farmers of the neighborhoods of New Rochelle and East Chester, whose cellars in those days were well supplied with hogsheads of good old cider, which they never failed to serve up in bountiful libations, to the great pleasure of their dis- tinguished visitor.^ A late resident of New Rochelle stated that his grandfather once called on Mr. Paine to serve him with some legal paper or process. Upon discovering the nature of it, he was greeted with a perfect shower of imprecations from the aged, blear- eyed, little old man. But his wrath soon spent itself, and the visitor was invited in. They entered the sleeping-room above men- tioned. There was a fire burning in the Franklin fire-place. In the middle of the room stood a small pine table without a cloth or cover of any kind. Upon it were the remains of a loaf of rye bread, a pitcher of milk and a piece of butter, from which Mr. Paine had evidently recently made his frugal breakfast. Another visitor at another time found this table adorned with a cover of old newspapers. The Franklin stove has been removed from the place which it occupied for so many years, and is now (1885) exhibited as a curiosity in the show window of Messrs. Bell & Harmen, of New Rochelle. At the time of the interview above described Mr. Paine was clad in a most extraordinary- looking outer garment, being nothing less than a dressing-gown made out of an old army blanket. The house was originally a small wooden building, one and a half stories in height, with a kitchen attached to the south gable. The removal of the remains of Paine from their burial-place in New Rochelle had its effect, too, upon English literature, for it led to the famous but irrev- erent epigram of Byron, beginning, — "In digging up your bones, Tom Paine, Will Cobbett lias done well," etc- l Coutanfs " Eeminiecences." ^Nole hij 3Ir.Coulant, — "It is naturally supposed by many that the resi dence of Thomas Paine in New Kochelle must have exerted an injuri ous influence upon the moral and religious character of the inhabitants, and the presence of a public monument to his memory is calculated to confirm this impression. In so far as this relates to the contempories of Paine, the majority of whom at the time in New Rochelle were of Hu- guenot descent, it must be acknowledged that the author of the 'Age of Reason' was not entirely destitute of followers and admirers among them ; and it is possible, and even probable, that this evil influence might have become more extended and permanent than it ever has be- Othee HrouEXOT Houses. — The dwelling upon Centre Street formerly owned and occupied by the late Mr. Samuel Davis, and still in good repair, al- though it has been much altered and added to, is un- doubtedly one of the oldest in the town. It was the residence for thirty years consecutively of the Rev. Theodosius Bartow, i)astor of the Protestant Episco- pal Church, who was settled in 1790, and died in New Rochelle, November 12, 1819. The venerable old tamarind tree at the east end of the house is said to have beeu planted by Mr. Bartow himself The chimney jambs in this house, in the principal room, are ornamented with the Dutch titles inscribed with Scripture mottoes so much in vogue in the olden time. It is probable that Mr. Bartow was not the first occu- pant, and that the house dated from long before the Revolutionary War. The Pixtard Mansion also has a pre-Revolu- tionary history ; and yet, notwithstanding its antiq- THliMAS PAINE S HOUSE. uity, it is one of the most desirable residences in New Rochelle. There are eleven rooms in the main build- come, but for the counteracting power exerted by the early Methodist Church, especially at Upper New Rochelle and along the entire extent of North Street. It is a remarkable fact, and might be regarded by some in the light of a special providence, that immediately subsequent to the death and burial of Paine in this neighborhood, and for over twenty yeai"S afterwards, the powerful appeals made to the hearts and consciences of the people by the early itinerant preachers of Methodism, as well as the combined eflorts of the whole membership of that church, were attended with extraordinary results, producing a complete change in the religious views and feelings of the community, and dealing to infidelity of the Paine type a blow from which it has never recovered. Nor was this counteracting influence confined to the place where it originated, in the vicinity of the Paine monument, at Upper New Rochelle, but it spread to the adjacent towns of East Chester, Mamaroneck and White Plains. In a word, so general and so popular was this religious reforma- tion in all the localities above referred to, that, for a time, any man thereabouts who should have openly professed himself to be a disciple of Thomas Paine would have been (and in a few cases actually was) re- garded as a sort of a moral monster by the general community. This NEW KOCHELLE. 691 ing, with two wings attached, one occupied as a kitchen. Tlie ceilings of all the rooms on the ground floor are fully ten feet in heiglit, and there is an open fire-place in every room in the house, but one. It stands almost directly ojjposite to the Presbyterian Church. The front line of this old place, previous to the year 1800, extended through to Huguenot Street. The making of Main Street cut off from it a triangular piece of land, which, lying thus between the two streets, was given by the trustees of Lewis Pintard to the Presbyterian Church, in the year 1827, and forms part of the site of the present edifice. In digging a deep drain along that portion of Main Street in front of the church, in the spring of 1884, a copper coin was thrown up by the workmen from a dei)th of ten or eleven feet below the surface. How it came to be buried there is a matter of conjecture. It was in a good state of preservation. The head of George III., King of Great Britain, is faintfy discern- ible. The date is almost obliterated, but seems to be 1780 or 1790. OLD HUcrEXOT HOUSE, Oil sir. Simeon Lester's Place, North Street, New Rochelle. The grounds adjacent to the house consist of over twenty-three acres, and there is upon them one of the finest springs in the town of clear, cool water, the Ir. Boudet's congiegiition may have formed, as we have seen that it did, but a small part of the whole French Colony at the time, and on the occasion referred to ; consisting no doubt of the officials and principal men of the town, to whom had been committed in good faith the man. agemcnt of church matters, and the religious interests of the colony in general. This class always has existetl, and does still exist in all church establishments ; men, who by their pecuniary means and prominence in society, as well as by their official relations to the church and state, ex- ercise a controlling influence. But it is equally certain, that the acts and doings of this class of (lersons cannot always be held to represent the views and wishes of a majoritij of the peoph'^ or even the unanimom ap- proval of their own number, since even in the case we are considering, there were at least two dissenting voices. There were doubtless many more. But we have not now the means of ascertaining how many more would have voted against this transfer (which carried with it the whole of their valuable church property, as was proved by the event), had they been allowed and encouraged to deposit their votes. That there would have been a considerable number of these protestauts is probable, for this, among other reasons. "John Coutant, who died in the year 184K, at the age of t)C, informed me several years before his death, that there was considerable dissatis- faction among the French Hugenot families in New Rochelle, and many comi)laints of unfairness, in the course pursued by the conformi^ts in this transaction. By it. not only was their church property taken away from them, under the new charter or grant of Queen Anne, and their ancient form of worship abolished by the adoption of that established in the English church ; but, as they could not conscientiously adopt the form of religious service and worship, — they [who decline to conform] were left without any place of worship, and deprived of the ministra- tions of their own chosen pastors." ' Soon after this separation, a new church was built by those who had seceded from the French Huguenot to the Episcopal Church, in the autumn of the year 1710.' This new edifice stood a little east of the present Episcopal Church. It was constructed of stone ; was 'Contents unpublished manuscript. 2 See Bolton. 'The views of those who confonued were presented in Bolton's His- tory, vol. i. p. 630. * Badeau's Pen and Ink Sketch. forty feet in length and thirty in breadth, and per- fectly plain within and without. The first pastor of the new Episcopal Church was the Rev. Daniel Boudet, who was ordained by the Bishop of London, a minister of the English Church and came to this country in 1(580. He died in 1722. During an inter- val of two years, between his death and the appoint- ment of his successor, services were performed by the Rev. John Bartow, who seems to have had a pretty wide field for his labors, as he says in a letter still ex- tant, that he preached " in four towns; East Chester, Westchester, Yonkers and New Rochelle; the last eight miles, Yonkers six miles and East Chester four miles from home ;" and " does other occasional of- fices." The horse of this rector, one would think, must have had a lively time and fairly earned his living, as there were then (1722) very few public con- veyances (if any) between these four towns. For his extra services to the Xew Rochelle Church during these two years, Mr. Bartow received from the En- glish Missionary Society the sum of ten pounds, the purchasing power of which, however, was more than double and perhaps three or four times what the same sum would be at the present time. Mr. Boudet was succeeded, in 1724, by the Rev. Pierre Stouppe, also a native of France, and ordained in 1723 by the Bishop of London. The conflict be- tween the two branches of the church — the French Huguenot and the Episcopal — was maintained with great severity during his pastorate, as appears from a letter of his to the Secretary of the English Mission- ary Society, dated 1725, in which he complains bit- terly and lamen.ts mournfully over the unhealed schism. He was followed upon his death, in 1760, by the Rev. Mr. Houdin, another Frenchman by birth, who was bred a Franciscan friar. Mr. Houdin died in 1776. The Rev. Theodotius Bartow was called to the church in 1790, they having been with- out a minister for fourteen years, during the troubles connected with the War of the Revolution. He con- tinued to serve the church until 1819 — nearly thirty years — but in June of that year resigned his charge. The list of ministers and rectors of the Episcopal Church in New Rochelle is as follows : Rev. David De Bonrepas, D D 1689 Rev. Daniel Boudet, \M 1695 Rev. Pierre Stoujipe, .\.M 1724 Rev. Michael Houdin, .\.M 1761 Rev. Theodotius Bartow 17l»0 Rev. Ravaud Kearny, .\.M 1819 Rev. Lewis P. Bayard, A.JI 1821 'Re\. Lawson Carter, .\.M 1827 Rev. Thonnis Winthrop, Cirt. D.D 1839 Rev. Richard fmstead Morgan, D.D • ... 1849 Rev. John II. Watson 1874 Rev. Chas F. Canedy, A.M 1876 (Present incumbent.] It appeare from the records that those of the French Huguenots who were unwilling to conform to the doctrine and discipline of the Church of England, 694 HISTOKY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. continued their connection with the old French Church, in New York City, and received their pas- tors, when they had any, as missionary bishops from that body. This relation existed from the year of the separation (1709), until 1764, as is proved by the records, and probably much longer. But in February 1808, a new church was incorporated, composed partly of the members of this ancient French Hu- guenot body, and partly of Presbyterians, but still with the title " The French Church in New Roch- elle." Matson Smith, John Eeid, Thomas Carpen- ter, Robert Givan, Gideon Coggeshall and James Somerville being trustees. On the 30th of May, 1812, it became a Presbyterian church in name as well as in fact, and was received into the care of the Pres- bytery of New York. The first pastor of the French Church after the separation was the Rev. Jean Brumand de Mouli- nars. The first pastor of the New Presbyterian Church was Rev. Isaac Lewis, Jr., 1815, who was succeeded in turn by the following : Rev. Klijali D. Wells . . . 182;i Rev. J. D. Wickliam . . . 18'jr, Rev. George Stebbiue . . . IX-ZH Rov. .lolin Miison 183") Rev. Gorman P. Abbot . . 18:i7 Rev. 1". Snyder 1811 Rev. Henry Martyn Scudder 1844 Rev. Chas. Hawley .... 1845 Rev. Charles E. Lindsley . lR4it Rev. James H. Taylor . . . 18.00 Rev. Erskine X. White . . THI\-> Rev. David Hopkins .... ISlii) Rev. Edward li. Biirkhalter 18711 Rev. Anthony R. Blacoubley 1877 Rev. R. Randall Hoes . . . 1878 Rev. William B. Walles (present incumbent). The first church edifice erected by the Presbyter- ians was built of wood, in the year 1815. In 18G0 it was removed, to make room for a new building. It was fitted for use as a parsonage, and presented to the trustees fi)r that purpose by the late Albert Smith, M.D., of New Rochelle. The new church, built in 1860-^1, is constructed of stone, and occupies nearly the same position as the old one. Its cost when completed was about seventeen thousand dollars. The church edifice of the E^piscopalians (one of the finest structures of the kind in the county), is also of stone, and was built under the supervision of the celebrated architect, Upjohn. It stands a few rods to the west of the shop once occupied by the quaint old stone edifice built for their worship by the Huguenots in the year 1710, and which, if it had been allowed to remain would now be one of the greatest curiosities in the country. If anything had to be removed it should have been the road, and not the venerable old church of their forefathers. Upon the subject of this ancient edifice one of the descendants of those who built and worshiped in it, has the following feeling remarks: " The Second French Protestant Church edifice in New Rochelle was erected in 1710-11. It was situated a little to the eastward of the former church, on Hu- guenot Street (called in Queen Anne's charter The High Street), and just in front of the residence of the late Doctor Peter Moulton. Its ground dimensions were thirty by forty feet. The roof was in the form of a square pyramid. The body of the structure was of rough, unhewn stone, and pierced by arched windows. The entrance, which was on the south side, was also an arched door-way. It has been conjectured that its ex- ternal sha])e was modeled after the famous Hugue- not Temple of La Ro- chelle, in France. The interior arrangements were equally primitive and unadorned, — plain, unpainted, uncushioned, high-backed pews ! An elevated box pulpit, built against the face of the wall opposite to the door- way. The desk was sur- rounded by a plain rail- ing, which formed the chancel or altar, and fur- nished with a small com- munion table made of wood of the wild cherry (which survived the old church for many years and which I have seen). From its peculiar shape, this church was popularly known and is still remembered by some of our old- est inhabitants as ' The Old Stone Jug.' Alas, that this venerable relic of antiquity should now have to be numbered among the things that were! The changes incident to the lapse of years, and the van- dalism of progress, or rather, shall I say, the progress of vandalism ? have so completely annihilated every vestige of the ancient structure, that even its exact situation, ilka that of its predecessor, cannot be defi- nitely determined, but is more or less a matter of con- jecture. And why, we ask, could not the grasping, all-absorbing spirit of change and novelty which characterizes the age have spared to us this one, humble monument of the past, to build which, it is NEW KOCIIELLE. G95 said, that the men carried stones in their hands, and the women mortar in their aprons? If for no other reason, it should have been suffered to remain that it might guard the sleeping dust of two of its earliest and most faithful pastors, Kev. Daniel Boudet and Pierre Stouppe, whose remains, together with those of the wife of the latter, wore deposited beneath its floor. O irony of Time and Fate! While the emblazoned images of these two good men, arrayed in full clerical costumes, are displayed in glowing colors upon the chancel windows of the present Gothic edifice, their bodies moulder beneath the stones and dust of the public highway, once by law and usage the burial- place of suicides ! " ' The Methodist house of worship on Banks Street is a neat and commodious structure. The organiza- tion is the second of that name in the town, the first being at Upper New Rochelle. The Baptist Taber- nacle, at the corner of Main Street and Locust Ave- nue, is sufficient for the requirements of the growing congregation at present, but there is ample room upon the grounds for its enlargement whenever that may be found to be desirable. The Roman Catholics have a capacious house of worship of Avood, and by far the largest congregation in the town, on Centre Street. Besides these, there are a German Lutheran and a German Methodist Church, making in all eight Protestant Churches and one Roman Catholic. At the present time (1884) all of these churches are fur- nished with pastors, and are in a flourishing condition, with a membership of nearly or quite one thousand. The Beech wood Cemetery. — For many years the town of New Rochelle had felt the need of some better place for the burial of the dead, the growing population having no other facilities for this purpose than the private or denominational burying-grounds afforded. On the 30th of January, 1854, the Beech- wood Cemetery was incorporated upon land owned by the late Dr. Albert Smith, of New Rochelle. It was chiefly by Dr. Smith's energy and liberality that this new burial-place was opened to the public, he having contributed largely both of time and money to this object. The position is convenient and well adapted to the purpose designed, and it is now the principal place of interment, both for the town and the vicinity. Educatiox. — For a long time after the settlement of the town the facilities for education, owing to the peculiar circumstances, were exceedingly limited. The clergy, as usual, were the principal teachers. " Our French ancestors," says the Rev. L. J. Coutant, in his valuable historical reminiscences of Huguenot New Rochelle, " who settled this town, and gave it the name which it now bears, about eighty-nine years before the Revolutionary War, received Iheir educa- tion in the French language, and, consequently, dur- ing the greater part of the period above named (eighty-nine years), the rising generation was edu- cated in French. The writer's grandmother received her education in that tongue, and used to read her French Bible and prayer-book. They were not desti- tute of good scholars, who understood both French and English, and could converse fluently in both lan- guages. The education of their children in those times devolved chiefly upon the pastors of the French Protestant Church. David Bonrepas, their first min- ister, gave instruction to the young people in letters and religion." Daniel Boudet was an excellent scholar and edu- cator ; his library it is said, consisted of over four hundred volumes, which for those times was large. Pierre Stouppe, his successor in the pastorate of the French Church, was a well educated man, and for many years kept a day and boarding-school for in- struction both in French and English. It is no trifling comment on his ability as a com]ietent teacher, that the Hon. John Jay, subsequently Ameri- can minister to the court of France, and of Hugue- not descent, and General Schuyler, of Revolutionary fame,were among his pupils. Indeed, the general knowl- edge of letters, in so far at least as reading and writing are concerned, may be inferred from the fact that among a list of sixty names subscribed to a petition to the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel, in connection with the Church of England in 1743, only five individuals signed by making a cross. But alas, for poor human nature ! All the devotion of these people to their religion, and such learning as they could command, did not prevent them from perpetrat- ing an act of barbarism. In 1776 they burned to death a negro by the sentence of three of the magis- trates of the town, for the crime of murder. The re- volting details are given in Coutant's " Reminis- cences," with a minuteness and particularity that are sickening. Mr. Bolton, in his history, says : "In a portion of the Guion property once owned by the late George Case, Esq., nearly opposite the old Eels mansion, on North Street, the remains of a large bed of char- coal were discovered a few years since, marking the site of this summary execution." '^ " Tradition reveals to us the existence of two school-houses in the town of New Rochelle, used as such probably before the Revolution and during the closing years of the 18th Century. One was situated in the neighi)orhood of the old tollgate, and the other on North Street, opposite the resi- dence of Mr. Simeon Lester, and just in fi'ont of a high clump of rocks, which at this place divided the road into two parts, running around the rock on both sides, leaving a triangular space between them, and on this gore of land the school-hou.se was built." The school-house in District No. 2 was on North Street, at the junction of this street with the road 1 Contniit's Manuscript. -Bolton, vol. i. p. I'mI. ' Coiilant's, " Reniiiiiecenc?s." 696 HISTOKY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. from New Eochelle to East Chester. That in District No. 3 was at Cooper's Corners, on the east side of North Street. The interior of these primitive school- houses (1795-1796) is thus described by Mr. Cou- tant: — "The inside of these houses was of the crud- est and cheapest finish. As to the outside, they were small, unpainted shanties, usually located on some surplus angle of the streets, or rocky land, unfit for cultivation, thus economizing ground, and mak- ing these barren spots, where no vegetation could grow, produce the precious fruits of education. The houses were ceiled round with unpainted boards, shrunken from their grooves ; consequently no venti- lators were needed ! Their ' fixtures ' were extremely rude and simple, consisting for the most ])art of pine boards nailed up to the sides and ends of the room for desks, with sometimes a shelf underneath, on which to keep books and slates. They were furnished with seats of long oaken slabs, with legs driven into auger holes at each end, and all of the fixtures and furniture were curiously notched and carved into many fan- tastic forms and grotesque images by the busy jack- knives of the mischievous tyros. The school-room was sometimes warmed by a fire in an open fire-place; but mostly by a small cast-iron stove, set upon a pile of bricks in the middle of the room." The teachers were stern and severe in their methods of teaching, using the ferrule and birchen rod with great frequency and freedom. In those days flagel- lation was thought to be a fundamental part of educa- tion. Most of these teachers were imported from England and Ireland. They had left their own country in search of a wider field for the exercise of their great powers for stimulating the minds of their pupils by external applications. They found it here in America, and in carrying out their peculiar meth- ods they only followed the customs of their native land. But their path was not always a flowery one. The application of force to the inculcation of learning was sometimes attended with disastrous results to themselves. From this severity of discipline very unjjleasant affrays took place between the teacher and his scholars, ending occasionally in the expulsion of the teacher from the school-room. As to qualifi- cations, "If the teacher could make a good quill pen, and write with facility a neat and fair hand, and solve the sums and repeat the tables in Daboll's arithmetic, he was considered a competent teacher, and received a certificate entitling the school taught by him to receive its proportion of the public money." The reading-books were "The New Testament," " The Sequel," "The American Preceptor," and ' The Child's Instructor" for larger and more advanced scholars, and a few primers for small children. The scarcity of books rendered it necessary that the teachers of these primitive schools should be well versed in all the English branches which they had to teach. But grammar and geography were at that time not com- monly taught in the public schools. These ancient school-houses, schools and teachers were the pioneers of the extensive and wonderful common-school sj'stem of the days in which we live. They were but the stepping-stones, so to sjieak, of those magnificent temples of science and learning which have since sprung up in almost every part of our favored land. As to those primitive structures in New Rochelle, they have vanished even from the recollection of most of the inhabitants. Every vestige of the two bid Huguenot school- houses is swept away, and they live only in tradition. The only teacher who taught school in either house, within the recollection of the writer, was Andrew Dean, Esq., some of whose descendants are still liv- ing in New Rochelle.^ In the year 1857 three school- houses were built (under the act of 1795), dividing the town into as many districts. The first was on the corner of a lane leading to the old French buiying- ground. It was on Huguenot Street, nearly in front of the present Episcopal Church. It was quite a stately school-house for those times, being about eighteen by thirty-tw-o feet on the ground and two stories high. Its pre-eminence in size and other con- siderations procured for it the name of " Academy." This school had quite a wide-spread reputation as a place of learning ; and some who received the rudi- ments of education here have subsequently obtained celebrity as professional men. Bishop De Lancey, whose parents resided at Mamaroneck, came down to this school. Daily the boy bishop might be seen, to the great wonderment of the other scholars, jogging along on horseback with his dinner-basket dangling at his elbow, to take his place among his fellow-stu- dents in the High School, at that time taught by a Mr. Fox. Sometime between 1825 and 1827 this old hive of learning gave place to the school in Me- chanics Street, which, in 1856-57, was exchanged for the building on Trinity Street, to which David Mil- ler, one of the teachers of the former school, be- queathed by will the sum of eighteen hundred dollars, which was invested in an addition to the Trinity Street brick school-house. Present Educational Facilities. — It is only within the last few years that any decided advance has been made in the jiublic schools of this town at all commensurate with the requirements of the age and the wants of the people. The accidental burning (March 30, 1882) of the school-house on Trinity Street, built 1856-57, has led to the erection of a very superior building upon its site. This building was plani^ed by the school board and erected under the supervision of Messrs. D. & J. Jardine, architects. The grounds are about three acres. Before entering upon the work, members of the board examined every school-house noted for superior advantages within their reach, their aim being to combine and concentrate the best elements from all in the building iCoutant's " Reminiscences." « \ I NEW KOCHELLE. t397 which they intended should be a model school-house in every respect. In this they have largely succeeded. The building is H-shaped, eighty-four feet front, one hundred and fifty feet deep. There are thirteen class-rooms, one library-room, one board-room, one principal's room, one assembly-room, fifty-four by ninety-three, with accommodations for about eight hundred pupils. There is an above-ground cellar, divided into play-rooms for wet weather, furnace, coal and store-rooms. The building is heated by steam from a fifty horse- power boiler. The system of ventilation is the " Gouge," and is working satisfactorily. There are five lines of hose, sui)plied with water from a tank in the top of the building, for the extinguishing of fires. The teachers are one principal, salary twenty-three hundred dollars; twelve lady teachers at salaries from four hundred to seven hundred dollars. There are in the town two other schools — one pri- mary, West New Rochelle ; one school for colored pupils, in Plarrison Street — with one teacher for each school. Library and Gymxasium. — It is impossible to conclude this sketch without some notice of the lib- eral benefactions of one of our citizens, Mr. Adrian Iselin, for the public benefit; more especially as this is, so far as I am aware, the only instance of the kind in the entire history of the town.' Mr. Iselin has not only fitted up at his own expense a fine building, con- taining a reading-room, library and billiard-room for the instruction and amusement of the young people, but he has expended many thousands of dollars in the erection of a gymiuisium for physical exercise, which, when complete, will be an ornament to the town, and ought greatly to promote the health and enjoyment of the inhabitants. This building is en- tirely uniijue, and has no rival, so far as I know, in this country; certainly not outside of the great cities. I have been furnished by Mr. William Le Count, of New Rochelle, with an elaborate description of the gymnasium, which is here given (in a form slightly condensed) from his manuscript : — " It is built of Calabar brick, and trinuned with blue stone and Philadelphia brick. The mason-work is of a superior quality. The arches over the windows and doors are a most attractive feature. Every brick exposed to view in these arches was specially chiseled and shaped on the premises, requiring a great amount of skill and labor to make this seemingly small part of the building. The roof is covered with red Akron tiles, which, on the main roof are flat, and on the towers and turrets corrugated, and ornamented with terra-cotta crestings and finials. The wood-work is of the best yellow and white pine and oak. The ex- treme length of the building is 114 feet; extreme ' >tr. Miller's gift of one tlioiisand eight hundred dollars for education should not be forgotten. width, 56 feet. Every attention has been paid to drainage and ventilation. The entire outside surface, where it rests upon the ground, is covered with asi)hal- tum or damp-proof material, and the bottom of the excavation for the structure is covered with asphalt, laid upon a bed of cement concrete, and the whole covered with cement. The walls of the building are hollow, and every room is connected with ventilating tubes, which extend to the outside top of the walls, i Two immense cisterns supply rain-water, which is ' passed through double filters before being used. Steam-heat is employed for warming and gas for lighting. The style of architecture is that of French military structures. The front corners are ornamented with two large towers, through one of which is the main entrance. In front of this entrance is a heavy balustrade of terra-cotta, surmounted by ornamental lamps. Over the main door is a panel of terra-cotta, containing a bas-relief representation of 'The Young Athletes.' There is a beautiful winding stair, of oak, I which conducts from the base of one of the towers to the topmost story of the building. The floor of the entrance is laid in a Roman Mosaic of tiles, black, red and salmon color, three-quarters of an inch square. The gymnasium proper is a room forty by eighty feet, without a post or pillar resting upon the floor. Light but beautiful trusses, which are self-supporting, sus- tain the heavy roof. The floor is of the choicest ver- tical grain yellow pine; the walls of buff terra-cotta brick ; ceilings, trusses and window-work of white and yellow pine, finished in their native color; the windows of French plate; the doors of polished oak ; trimmings and gas-fixtures of solid bronze, and pol- ished brass, made expressly for this building. The running track, which is elevated .about eight and a half feet above the floor of the main room, extends entirely around the building, and is suspended from the roof. Behind it (at one end) there is a gallery for the accommodation of visitors. Under the floor of j the main room is the bowling alley, one hundred by twenty feet. It is on the south side, and is fitted I with four alleys, in the most approved modern style. I This room, although below the surface of the ground, is most admirable lighted by a row of windows in j amber-colored cathedral glass, in circular form and set in lead. On the opposite side of the building are the dressing-rooms, fitted up with lockers and all suitable modern conveniences. Beyond these are the boiler and fuel-rooms. A handsome iron fence sur- rounds the building in front. The entire sidewalk is flagged and curbed in a style equal to that of any of the public buildings in the large cities. The gym- I nasium occupies a central position at the corner of I two of the principal streets of the village. The in- tention of its founder is to have it a perfect gymna- siiun. It will be furnished with everything required to make it so, and a competent professor will be ap- pointed to superintend and direct the exercises." On the whole, it may be safely pronounced to be 698 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. one of the finest institutions of the kind in the United States, and it is lioped and believed that it will be practically free for the physical training and education of the people. The donor of these important gifts is one who does not covet notoriety. He is too modest to approve of any extended eulogy on account of the good he has done. Let him, therefore, enjoy the consciousness of having tried to benefit his fellow-men ; and let these two solid and useful structures stand in the midst of our village as the enduring memorials of his benev- olence. Statistics of professions, trades and occupations in the town of New Rochelle: Agents (insurance and real estiite) 5 Bakei-s 5 Banks 1 Blacksmiths 4 Barbers 5 Book-stores 3 Butchers 5 Carriage makers 4 Master carpenters and builders 8 Cabinet-makei-s o Clothiers 3 Churches 9 Average Sabbath attendance : Catholic (1) TOO Protestant (S) "50 Total 1450 Average death rate, five yeare (1880-85) pr. cent .... 2.0024 Druggists 3 Dry-goods 2 Engineers (civil) 2 Feed stores 4 Grocers 10 Hardware 3 Harness 2 Jewelers 3 Livery stables ■ ■ 4 Liquors and beer (licensed) 44 " " (unlicensed) 12 Lawyei-s 7 JIasons and stone-cuttei-s 20 Millinery and niantua-makers 12 Ministers 11 Newspapere 2 Painters, house, sign and carriage 17 Printers 7 Population aliout 5500 Physicians and surgeons 7 Shoemakers 10 Stoves and tinware |3 L'ndertakei's 3 Veterinary surgeons 2 A number of substantial brick buildings have been erected in the village during the past few years. The addition of any more structures of wood, as the popu- lation increases, is to be deplored and dreaded as a source of danger from fire. The town hall, which stands on the corner of Main and Mechanic Streets, no doubt fulfils to a certain extent the purposes for which it was erected. But it is totally destitute of all pretensions to architectural beauty. A much bet- ter and more convenient public building might have been erected for the same amount of money. The absence of a clock that strikes the hours upon its tower was an absurd blunder, and it is to be hoped that, at no distant day, the demands of the public will compel the erection of something more orna- mental and more suitable to the spirit of the age. BIOGRAPHY. SIMEON LESTER. In the uortli western portion of New Rochelle, and upon the old road leading to White Plains, stands the tasteful house of Mr. Simeon Lester. He is in his ninetieth year, but enjoys the best of health and the possession of a strong active mind. The family is of English origin, and descended from Sir Nicholas Leicester, a knight of the thirteenth century. Upon their emigration to New England early in the eighteenth century, the spelling of the name seems to have been changed from Leicester to Lester, and William, Mr. Lester's grandfather, who served under Colonel Ledyard at Croton Fort, wrote his name in this way. Though they had but lately left the mother country and were still bound to it by ties of noble blood, the Lesters did not hesitate to embark both their property and their lives in the struggle for American freedom. From fifteen to twenty of the family perished at the capture of Groton Fort. Their martial spirit de- scended upon the father of Mr. Simeon Lester, and though not in active service he was captain of the Grenadier Company of Norwich, Conn., where the subject of this sketch was born, April 16, 1796. He spent the early part of his life on his father's place, and became captain of the Norwich Light In- fantry Company. In 1820 he married Hannah Maria Brewster, who was born at Preston, Conn., February 6, 1795, and died at her home in New Rochelle June 12, 1865. She was a descendant in the seventh gene- ration of Elder Brewster, who came to this country in the " Mayflower." Five years after his marriage Mr. Lester, at the suggestion of his brother-in-law, moved with his family from Norwich to New Rochelle, where he purchased the extensive farm, upon which he now resides. The place has become famous as the previous home and property of Thomas Paine, it having been presented to him by the United States government. His grave, the house in which he lived, and the monument raised to his memory are still standing upon it, and have not only, not been mutilated by Mr. Lester, as I I I NEW ROCHELLE. 099 was charged by the daily papers, but have been pre- served by him with special care. When Mr. Lester took possession of the property it was merely a rolling plain, thickly strewn with boulders. By unremitting toil he converted it into the highly fertile and splendidly improved property, whose appearance enchants the eye of the sj)ectator. For many years Mr. Lester was obliged to rise from his bed at midnight, collect the produce which he had forced the stony soil to yield and depart by one o'clock in the morning for No. 22 Bowery, and other stands in Xew York City, where he would await pur- chasers. It was his habit of industry and perseverance which made Mr. Lester the successful man he is, and now that he has attained financial prosperity, he rests in the consciousness of a life well spent. In 1825, upon his removal to New Rochelle, he presented his letter of membership, and was admitted to the Presbyterian Church, of which he has been an elder for sixty years, and superintendent of the Sabbath-school for thirty years. He has deeply interested himself in young men, and several who have attained sucess in business life attribute the habits which have gained it for them to the educating influence of their old friend. His only surviving child, David Brainard Lester, of the firm of Joseph Lester & Co., hatters at No. Broad- way, New York, is a resident of Brooklyn, and is a member of the Congregational Church. Some years ago Mr. Lester transferred his property to his sou, Josejih W. Lester (deceased), and it is now in the possession of his daughter-in-law, with whom he resides. In proportion, as one differs from his fellows, so does he become famous. In such proportion only as his life benefits others, does he attain true greatness. Judged by these considerations Mr. Lester, whose Christian life has been wide in its influence, may look from his window in pity upon the monument of the man whose genius dazzled the world, rejoicing in his own possession of the milder quality. JONATHAN CARPENTER. Mr. Carj)enter is of Welsh origin. Jonathan Car- penter, his grandfather, born September 7, 1749, was a son of Benedict Carpenter, who died June 22, 1791, and, because of British persecution during the Revo- lution, was forced to remove from Scarsdale to Long Island, where he married, on April 18, 1782, Miss Esther Coles. After peace was declared, he returned to Scarsdale, and took up his trade of a blacksmith. Jonathan Carpenter, Sr., had five children, the fourth of whom, Joseph Carpenter, was the father of the Jonathan who is the subject of this sketch. Joseph Carpenter, even before the War of the Rebellion, attained to wide celebrity because of his ojiposition to slavery. He was born at Scarsdale September 3, 1793, and on September 15, 1814, he married Marga- ret W. Cornell, who was of French descent. There were two children, — the oldest Esther and the second Jonathan, who was born at Scarsdale, September 11, 1816. While he was yet in infancy, his parents removed from Scarsdale to New Rochelle, and until his eighteenth year he was engaged in farming. At that time his poor health obliged him to give up the active work to which he had accus- tomed himself, and he did not resume it again till he was thirty. j Mr. Carpenter's father then retired, and the whole working of the farm fell into his hands. For nearly forty years he has continued perseveringly at his labor, till at last, by dint of hard work and strict integrity, he has amassed a fortune. Since the place came into his possession he has added to it the Hav- iland property, containing seventy-seven acres of good farming land, with a saw-mill upon it, which he continues to operate at this time. He married January 11, 1862, Miss Phila Jane Benedict at Scarsdale. There are no children. He is a member of the Society of Friends, and is a strong temperance advocate. In politics he was formerly a Whig, but is now a Republican. He lives at present in his newly-erected residence at New Rochelle, from which he continues to direct his large interests. W. W. EVANS. Walton White Evans of " Sans-Souci " near New Rochelle was born in 1817, at Sunderland, on the Raritan, N. J. He is descended from many of the leading colonial families of New York, New Jersey, Virginia and South Carolina. After spending, or as he says, wasting six of the most important years of his life in classic studies, he was invited by his old and much honored friend General Stephen Van Rensselaer, the patroon of Albany, to come to the polytechnic school the latter had founded at Troy. This suited his inclinations, as his tastes were for natural sciences and technical studies. Graduating from that school in 1836 and sharing the first honors with a friend, nephew of the patroon, he was again favored by Gen- eral Van Rensellacr, who as president of the canal board placed him in the engineer corps of the State canals, and so influenced and cared for his promotion that in three months he was elevated to a position,' that under ordinary circumstances, he would have j spent two years of hard work in reaching. Remain- ing on the State canals (that severe school of hydrau- lic engineering) for seven years, and there getting disciplined to industrious habits and love for work he left that service, entered on railway engineering and was actively employed in railway construction for some years. In 1850 he went to Chili, South America, to take a leading part in directing the con- struction of the first railway ever built south of the equator, remaining there for most of the next ten years. He directed the construction of several pub- lic works, among which were two railways for English companies of London, returning to the United States 700 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. in 1860. He has during a quarter of a century de- voted most of his time to professional labors as con- sulting and advising engineer to government work in Cuba and Peru, and to other public works in the Argentine Republic, Mexico, Central America, Aus- tralia, New Zealand and Russia. His zeal and energy have been devoted with much success to promoting American interests in foreign countries. In the early part of 1886 he was appointed on a commission with several English engineers to sit in London, and ^ determine some engineering questions of great importance in connection with extensive and costly bridges to be built in Australia, but was unable to accept the honor. His aim has been to so elevate national character that Americans can with pride say when traveling, I am an American citizen, and find it all sufficient, as he says, he found it in Russia, as his trunks were never opened when he presented his passport and the officials saw the name of Wm. H. Seward on the docu- ment. GEORGE FERGUSON. The life of Mr. Ferguson strikingly illustrates the working out of a great principle, namelj", that strict attention to business, accompanied by industrious habits, thorough integrity, and a true appreciation of the smaller matters of life, will give its result, just what it has gi\'en us in his case— a sound financial success. Mr. Ferguson was born December 15, 1831, at Esopus, Ulster County, N. Y., where his father, James Ferguson, was engaged in building. For a short ])eriod he enjoyed the privilege of the public school in his native place, and when the family re- moved to Fairfax Court House, Va., he attended its local school. The circumstances of the family early compelled him to contribute his share toward the general support, which he did by helping his father in the building trade. At the age of nineteen he was visiting with a friend at New Rochelle, N. Y.. when he was offered a position as clerk in the store of Samuel Underbill, and it is from the small beginning thus obtained that he has succeeded in developing the extensive busi- ness interests which to-day command his attention. For three years he remained with Mr. Underbill and then was induced by Mr. Vanderburg, of the firm of Geo. E. Vanderburg & Co., wholesale notion dealers in New York City, to enter their establish- ment as a salesman. But Mr. Underbill, trading in a small way behind his country counter, missed the active and energetic young clerk who had left him and finally, after two years had elapsed, offered him a partnership. Mr. Ferguson accepted the offer, and the firm began busi- ness in 1857, under the name of Underbill and Ferguson. The partnership expired by limitation in the spring of 1861. He then leased a proi>erty upon the Main Street, opposite the old store, and re- sumed business under the firm-name of Geo. Fergu- son & Co. After three years his partner retiring on account of ill health left Mr. Ferguson the sole pro- prietor. He finally purchased the leased property, improved and enlarged his store, and continued the business alone till the spring of 1875, when he formed a part- nership with a friend doing business in New York City. A fire in a neighboring building one night in the autumn of 1875, consumed his store and about seventy-five thousand dollars worth of property, but with characteristic promptness he hired a vacant store, set men cleaning and scrubbing, and by sun- rise the next morning had a large sign posted up and his clerks ready, books in hand, to take orders for immediate delivery. His prompt action at this time not only saved him much money but enabled him to hold his trade till he could replace the destroyed building by the elegant brick one, which is at present devoted, with the ex- ception of a public hall occupying a portion of the second floor, to the purposes of his business. The property has a frontage of eighty-two feet on Main and one hundred and forty upon Centre Street, and is probably the largest establishment of its kind in Westchester County. Ever since he started in business Mr. Ferguson has been gradually adding to his financial strength and is now in possession of a large amount of prop- ! erty in and about the village which has been the scene of his success. He married, February 3, 1856, Miss Julia F. Hud- son, and has one son and three daughters, two of whom are married. In politics he is a Republican, and has been since the organization of the party. Formerly he was village clerk and afterward was also town clerk of New Rochelle. At present he is a use- ful member of the board of education, for the duties of which office he continues to find time, even amid the press of private business. JO.SEPH B. BREAVSTER. Mr. Brewster is descended from Elder William Brewster, who came to this country with the Puritans in the "May flower." His father was the celebrated phy- sician, Dr. Elisha Brewster, who moved from Norwich, Conn., to White Plains, N. Y., early in the century. Dr. Brewster married Mary Burling, of u family fam- ous in the Revolutionary history of Westchester County, and Joseph B. is the second of their nine children. He was sent at the age of thirteen to a boarding-school at Jamaica, Long Island, and among his earliest recollections is that of crossing the East ] River in a sail ferry-boat. After spending one year at school he was obliged by the death of his father to return to New York. He entered the hat-store of his ' cousin, Joseph Brewster, where he continued as a clerk for nearly ten years, when he engaged in the I I PELHAM. 701 business on his own account at No. 57 Bowery, New York City. Mr. Brewster remained in this pursuit for forty- three years, steadily maintaining the wliile an integ- rity and fixedness of purpose which formed the ground-work of his financial success. He was at one time a large property-holder in New York, and the spot upon which the Oriental Bank stands was for- merly in his i)Ossession. In 1869 he retired from business, having meanwhile purchased from Charles Van Benscoten the beautiful residence at New Ro- chelle which he now occupies. ^ Mr. Brewster is a director in the Westchester Fire Insurance Company. In politics he was formerly a Whig, but is now a stanch Republican. He was a member of the Lafayette Guards, and was with them at the reception of the distinguished French- man upon his second coming to this country, in 1824, when it was also his pleasure to shake the Marquis by the hand. He married Miss Sarah Ann Hutchinson, of Hugue- not descent, whose moth- er died in the ninety- third year of her age, at the residence of ^Ir. Brewster. Of their twelve children, five daughters and one son still survive. The son is a lieutenant in the Twenty-second Regi- ment N. G. S. N. Y., and resides with his parents at New Rochelle. Mr. Brewster is a Quaker of the Orthodox branch, and though he is now over eighty years of age, he is foremost in every good word and work. JOSEPH B. BKEWSTER. CHAPTER XYII. PELHAM. BY KEV. CHARLES E. LIXDSLEY, D.D. Of New Rochelle. Pelh.\.m is situated to the southeast of New Ro- chelle. It has for its southern boundary Long Island Sound. A small stream, called by the Indians the Aqueanouncke, and by the English Hutchinson's River, separates it from East Chester. It appears to have been purchased from the Indians some time previous to the year 1666 by Thomas Pell, and by him called Pelham, an old English name composed of Pel (remote) and Ham (mansion). By Governor Nichols it was granted and confirmed, in 1666, " To Thomas Pell. Esq., of Fairfield in Connecticut, to- gether with the island adjacent and all its privileges," and erected into "an enfranchised township or manor" and secured to him and his heirs. The Pells are of English origin and a family of very old standing in the counties of Norfolk and Lincolnshire. Thomas Pell, commonly known as Lord Pell, the first proprietor of this township, ap- pears to have been an adherent of the popular party in the great struggle bet- ween the Parliament and the crown, called the En- glish Revolution. Hav- ing been identified with the Puritans under the protectorship of Crom- well, after the restoration of the monarchy, in 1660, he fled from the ven- geance of the Royalists into France. He after- wards removed to Onck- away, or Fairfield, in Connecticut, and from thence came to Pelham, where he purchased of the Indians the right to the soil. After his death, which happened about 1680, the manorial pro- prietorship descended to John Pell, his nephew, son of the famous Dr. Pell, ambassador of Oli- ver Cromwell to the Swiss Cantons.' In 1691 the name of John Pell is found on the list of members- returned by the sherifi" to represent the county ot Westchester, New Y'ork.- The territory now within the limits of the town of Pelham was claimed both by the Dutch of New Am- sterdam and the colony of Connecticut. There can be no doubt that the Dutch were the first to discover and settle upon the island of Manhattan and the ter- ritory between the North and East Rivers. Both professed to have purchiised their title from the Indi- ans. But we know what that meant in those days. The whites took what they wanted and paid the Indi- ans what they pleased. All transactions were with the chiefs, and the chiefs were not usually in a condi- tion, when the land was bought, to look out very carefully for their side of the bargain. So it hap- ' Vaughan's " Protectorate of Cromwell.'' - Smith's " Hist, of New Yorlj," p. 72. 702 HISTOHyr OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. pened that afterwards, when the Indians came to be dis2)ossessed of all their favorite resorts upon the shore, and driven back by the tide of white immigra- tion into the interior, and when they found, more- over, that they had received no just equivalent for their homes and hunting and fishing-grounds, there was trouble along the whole line. In all the Indian Avars in which the aborigines were involved with the Puritans, the Dutch, aud the Virginians, and which cost thousands of lives and an untold amount of suf- fering on both sides, it may fairly be doubted whether the Indians were in a single instance the aggressors. The Quakers of Pennsylvania, under William Penn, had no difficulty with them. The Indians in the British possessions of North America are and for almost a century have been peacefully disposed. But when Hendrick Hudson sailed in the " Half- Moon " up the river which bears his name, one of the very first acts of himself and crew was to make a wanton and unprovoked attack with firearms upon the inoffensive natives, whom curiosity had brought down to the shore. The general plan of our ancestors in those good old days, with regard to those whom they found in pos- session where they wanted to settle, was robbery and murder first ; afterwards war, negotiation and then missionaries. This, too, with the exception of the missionaries, was the course pursued towards them by the redoubtable William Kieft, the Dutch Gov- ernor of New Amsterdam, about the year 1643. The Puritans in their treatment of the aborigines were •often harsh and unjust. But they were men governed by certain religious ideas, and never did anything api)roacliing in wanton wickedness the act of Kieft which led to the outbreak, in which Anne Hutchin- son lost her life, in Pelham in 1643. In the year 1626 the munificent sum of twenty- four dollars had been originally paid to the Indians for the whole of New York Island — (twenty-two thousand acres) ; paid too, in " beads and trinkets," on which, very likely, there was a large profit to the buyers. No doubt the Indians ought to have been satisfied ; but, strange to say, when they were crowded out, not only from the island, but from Staten Island, Long Island and the shores of the bay, the Hudson River and the Sound by the new settlers, they took it to heart in away for which neither beads nor trinkets proved a solid con- solation. Hence came troubles and difficulties which, through the insane course of Governor Kieft, culmi- nated in his ordering a general attack to be made upon the neighboring tribes, at the very time when their distress and dissatisfaction had reached the highest point. Not only had the Dutch traders sold •whiskey to the Indians in abundance, but firearms and ammunition as well. In the middle of the winter, when the river (Hud- son) was full of ice, and the savages were collected in their winter camps, a war-party from the powerhil Mohawks at the north came sweeping down upon them, armed with the guns the Dutch had furnished, and drove before them far greater numbers — whole settlements indeed — of the Algonquins. This was the opportunity chosen by Kieft, to cross the river with his Dutch soldiers from Fort Amsterdam, make an attack upon the defenseless savages, peacefully sleep- ing in their wigwams, "just at midnight, the winter's night being cold and still." " Eighty Indians were killed at Pavonia, Hoboken, and forty at Corlaer's Hook that night, with horrible barbarities that might have given the savages themselves a lesson in the art of torture." The consequence was, that "all about the lower river and the bay, and on Long Island, the Algonquin people rose furiously against the whites." The terrors of an Indian war broke forth with a sud- denness which appalled the colonists, and every swamp and wood from the country of the Hacken- sacks, New Jersey, to the Connecticut seemed all at once to be swarming with hostile savages. The out- lying "bouweries" and plantations were laid waste, their men killed and their women and children made prisoners. After this there was a brief respite, from March until midsummer. But the war broke out again in August with renewed fierceness among i the tribes above the Hudson Highlands. By Septem- ber the conflict was raging with lull force. In the south a band of savages fell upon the quiet home of Anne Hutchinson, at Anne's Hoeck, Pelham Neck, and she, her son-in-law Collins, her son Francis and all the other members of her family, with one excep- tion, were killed. The youngest daughter, a little girl, was carried into captivity and lived for four years among the Indians. The sad fate of this woman has tinged with romance her whole history. She was not so bad as her enemies have painted her, nor was she, on the other hand, the mild and blameless saint, some recent historians have imagined. But she was a religious ' enthusiast ; a female theological polemic, armed with a tongue and a temper which made her no unequal match even for the stern and unyielding fathers of New England. In fact, the controversies which she I raised, engendered such divisions among them as to threaten the safety of l)oth church and State. Where- fore, by a decree of the General Court, she was ban- ished from the colony. She went to Connecticut, and afterwards to New York, where we find her in the j summer of 1642, permission having been given to her I by the Dutch authorities to settle at Pelham, in 1 connection with other English families. Her portrait [ is thus drawn by an impartial historian. "She was a woman of superior intelligence, bright, witty, good I at a fencing match of tongues, versed in Scripture and theological literature; never so happy as when descanting on her own views. Her temper was resolute ; she ruled her weak husband, and had a taste for ruling: To be an influential centre of opinion was her ambition, which she took no trouble to conceal. She claimed to be " inspired," and that PELHAM. 703 it had been " revealed to her" that she would come to New England to be persecuted, but that God would ruin the colony for her sake. She narrowly escaped procuring the verification of her own prediction." ' For a woman so constituted the change must have been great from the heated discussions at Boston to the unsettled wilderness around Pelham Bay. That name was not known, it is true, for many years after- wards. But the names " Annies Hoeck and Hutchiu- sons River " still bear testimony to the presence and fate of this remarkable woman. It seems a strange providence that, after her troubled and stormy career, she should uot have been permitted to pass the evening of her days in peace, where no controversies, theological or otherwise, and no religious opinions, orthodox or heterodox, Calvinistic or Arminiau would ever have disturbed the profound repose of the inhabi- tants, even could her life have been prolonged to the j)resent day and hour.'^ In the year 1654, Thomas Pell bought of the In- dians (so he stated in his testimony before a Court of Assize, held in New York, Septeral)er 29, 1665), the title to the lands afterwards known as Pelham, Westchester and New Rochelle. This whole tract of land was originally included in the grant made by the Indians to the Dutch West India Company in the year 1(540.^ What Pell paid to the Indians for it does not clearly appear. Probably not so much as the Dutch had paid them twenty-eight years before for the whole of [Manhattan Island— twenty-four dollare in beads and trinkets. " A valuable consideration " are Mr. Pell's own words, but as no specification is given, this phrase has little meaning. In the year 1666 PelTs title was confirmed by royal patent, issued by Richard NichoUs, as follows : " RlCHARI> XlCHOLLS, Es(j.: " Governor under His Royal Highness the Duke of York, of all his ' Bryant's " Hist, of C. S." 2 The following appeared in the Aeid'oii- buili/ Tribune o( April 23,1886: RECiLLING A MA.SSACRE OF INDIANS. " The skeletons which are being uneaithed at t'ouiniunipaw Avenue and Halliday Street, Jersey City, are now believed to be those of Indians. Twenty-eight had been excavated last evening. It was supposed at first that the place Wits the site of an ancient and forgotten buryiiig-ground, but some historical facts were discovered yesterday which throw light on the subject. On the night of February 25, 164:i, Governor Kiuft, of Sew- Anisterdam, sent a company of Dutch soldiers across the river to what was then known as ' Jahn de Dacher's Hoeck,' with orders to extermin- ate a Tillage of Indians encamped there. The soldiers, so the story goes, surprised the Indians ami massacred nearly every person in the village. A few escaped and made their way back into the country, toward the ipresent site of Newark. Trenches were dug and the bodies thrown into them indiscriminately. The scene of the butchery is now known as La- fayette, and, after nee.rly two and a half centuries, one of the trenches has been opened. Crowds gathered around the place yesterday while the excavating was going on and looked at the skulls and bones. The num- ■ber of bodies can only be determined by means of the skulls, as the bones are all mixed together, ami many of them crumble at the touch into line dust. The best preserved portions of bodies are the teeth." The discovery of these bones at this time is certainly a marked coin- cidence. There can be little doubt that the conjecture as to their being the remains of the Indians slain near this s|>ot in the attack made upon them by Kieft is the true one. ^See Bolton's " Hist. Westchester County," article Xew Rochelle. Territories in America. To all to whom these presents shall come, send- ! eth greeting; U'/iercm, there is a certain Tract of Land within this Gov- ernment upon the Main Situate, lying and being to the Eastward of West Chester bounds, bounded to the Westward with the river, called by the Indians ' .\queanonncke,' commonly known by the English by the ' name of Hutchinson's river, which runnith into the Bay lying between Throgmorton's Neck and .\nn Hook's Neck, conunonly called Hutchin- son's Hay, bounded on the east by a brook called Cedar Tree Brook, or Gravelly Brook, on the South by the .Sound which lieth between Long Island and the main land, with all the islands in the Sound not already granted or otherwise disputed of, lying before that tract of land so bounded, as is before expressed, ami northward to run into the woods about eight English miles in breadth, as the bounds to the Sound, w hich i said trai t of land hath heretofore been purchased of the Indian proprie- i tors, and ample satisfaction given for the same. " Now Know I'e, That by virtue of the Commission andauthority unto [ me given by His Koyal Highness, .lames, Duke of York, Sec, upon w horn I by lawful grant and patent from His Majesty, the proprietary and gov- ernment of that part uf the main land, as well as of Lung Islaml and all the islands adjacent, among other things is Settled, I have thought pro- I per to give, grant, contirm and ratify, and, by these presents do give, I grant, confirm iV ratify unto Thomas Pell, of Onckway, a/ins Fairfield, j His Majesty's Colony of Connecticut, gentleman, his heirs and assigns, I all the said tract of laiiil bounded as aforesaid, together with all the lands islands, seabays, woods, mead avs, pastures, marches, lakes, waters, creeks, fishing, hawking, hunting and fowling, and all other jtrofits, I commodities, emoluments and hereditaments to the said tract of land and islands belonging with them, and every of their appurtenances, and of every part and parcel thereof ; and that the said tract of land and prem- ises shall be forever after held, reputed, taken and be an enfranchised township, manor and place itself ; and shall always, from time to time, and at all times hereafter have, hold and enjoy like and equal privileges and immunities with any town, enfranchised place or manor within this government, and shall in no manner of way be subordinate or belonging unto, have any dependance upon, or in any wise be under the rules, or- j dei-s or directions of any riding, townsliiii or township place, or jurisdic- I tion, either upon the Main or upon Lung Island, but shall in all cases, j things and matters, be deemed, reputed, taken and held as an absolute, entire, enfranchised township, manor and place of itself in the govern- ment, and shall be ruled, ordered and directed in all matters as to gov- ernment accordingly, by the Governor and his Council and the general Courts of Assizes; only always provided that the inhabit- l ants of the said tract of land granted, as aforesaid shall be obliged to send forward to the next towns, all public packets and letters or hue and cries coming to this place or going from it to any other of His Majesty's Colonies ; to have and to hold the said tract of ' land and grant, with all and singular the appurtenances, premises, to- gether with the privileges, immunities, franchises A advantages herein j given and granted unto the said Thomas Pell, his heirs and assigns, to I the proper use and behoof of the said Thomas Pell for ever, firmly, freely & clearly, in as large and ample manner and form, and with such full and absolute immunities and privileges as before is e.vpressed, as if he had held the same immediately from his Majesty the King of Eng- land, \'c., A'c, Ac, his successors as of the Manor of East Greenwich, in the County of Kent, in free and common soccage, and by fealty, only yielding, rendering A; jiaying yeaily A every year unto His Royal Highness, the duty forever and his heirs, or to such Governor as shall, from time to time, be by him constituted and appointed, as an acknowi- I edgment, one lamb, on the first day uf May ( if the lamb shall be de- manded.) "Given under my hand and Seal at Fort. James, in New York, on the Island of Manhattan, the Sixth day of October, in the 18tli year of the reign of our suvereign lord Charles the Second, by the grace of God, of j England, Scotland A Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, Ac, Ac, Ac. and in the year of our Lord God, 166G. " RiCHABD NiCHOLLS." The above grant to Thomas Pell was confirmed to his successor and heir, John Pell, on the 20th day of October, 1()87, by the then Governor of New York, Thomas Dongan, as follows : " Thomas Dongan, Captain-Oeneral and Governor-in-Chief in and over the province of New Yorke, and the territories depending thereon, in America, under the Jlost Sacred Majesty, James the Second, by the grace of God, Kinge of England, Scotlaml, Fi ance and Ireland, defender of the faith. &c., — to all to whom these presents shall come, sendeth greeting : 704 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTEH COUNTY. Whereas, Richard NichoUs, Esqr., late governor of this province, by his certaine deed in w riting, under his liand and seal, bearing date the sixth day of October, in the eighteenth year of the reigne of our late sovereigne lord, Charles the Second, by the grace of God, of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, King & defender of the faith, &c., and in thej'earof our Lord God one thousand six hundred sixty and six, did give, grant, confirm and rattefye, by virtue of the commission and authoritye unto him given by his (then) royal highness, James, Duke of York, Ac, (his now Majesty) upon whome by lawful grant and pattent from his (then) Majesty, the propriety and government of that part of the maine land, as well as Long Island, and all the Islands adjacent. Amongst other things was settled unto Thomas Pell, of Onkway, alias Fairfield, in his Majes- ty's Colony of Connecticut, gentleman, all that certaine tract of land upon the maine land lying and being to the Eastward of Westchester bounds, bounded to westward with a river called, by the Indians, ' Aqua- conounck,' commonly known to the English by the name of Hutchin- son's River, which runneth into the bay lying between Throgmorton's Neck and Anne Hooke's Neck, commonly called Hutchinson's Bay, bounded on the east by a brooke called Cedar Tree Brooke, or Gravelly Brooke; on the South by the Sound, which lyeth between Long Island and the maine land, with all the islands on the Sound not before that time granted or disspossed of, lying before that tract of land So bounded as is before expresst, and northward to runne into the woods about eight English miles, the breadth to be the same, as it is along by the Sound, together with all the lands, islands, soyles, woods, meadows, pastures, mar- shes, lakes, creeks, waters, fishing, hawking, hunting and lb^\iing, and all other prolfltts coinmodityes, heridetaments to the Said tract of land and islands belonging, with their and every of their appurtenances, and every part and parcel thereof ; and that the said tract of land and pre- mises should be forever thereafter held, deeme The fate of Leialer through whom this purchase was made is fully related in the contemporaneous history of those times. He took the lead in a popular movement, in 1088, against the constituted authori- ties, and assumed or wiis chosen by his partizans to the government. For this act, he was tried, found guilty of treason, and hung in chains, on the 17th of May, 1691, on the spot now occupied by the City Hall PELHAM. 705 one hundred ai res, from the Manor of Pelham, for the sum of about one dollar per acre. The one hun- dred acres was a free gift to the French Huguenot Church, erected or to be erected by the inhabitants. The Manor of Pelham had originally contained nine thousand one hundred and sixty-six acres, so that nearly two-thirds of it now constitute the town of New Rochelle. The islands in the sound opposite Pelham, belong to that town. These are Minneford's (now City Island) containing about two hundred and thirty acres; Hunter's Island, two hundred and fifty acres; and Hart Island, eighty-five acres. The heir of Thomas Pell to the Pelham Manor, was John Pell, his ne|)hew, whose death, according to the inscription upon his monument, happened in the year 1700. He is said to have lost his life by the upsetting of a boat off City Island, in the autumn of that year. His eldest son, Thomas, succeeded to the inheritance, and died in 173'J at the IManor House, which stood not far from the i>rcsent Barton dwelling. The subse- iiuent history of the Pell family may be found, given at length in Bolton's history. On the 18th of October, 1776, the British forces landed upon Pelham Neck, ten days previous to the battle of White Plains. They came from Throgmor- ton's, now Throg's Neck. They were met by the Americans and a heavy skirmish resulted. After some loss, the Americans fell back, and the British advanced towards New Rochelle. Though largely ouliuimbered, the retreat of the Americans was or- derly and their resistance obstinate. The loss on both sides was probably about equal. The owners of the islands along the Pelham shore suffered more severely from this invasion than those in the interior, because a i)ortiou of the British fieet was always anchored in the Sound, and boats were constantly landing to obtain sui)plies, which they often and perhaps intentionally forgot to pay for. One Benjamin Palmer, who lived upon City Island, after tlie war was over sent a petition to Gov- ernor Clinton, complaining loudly of his wrongs and grievances. He stated that he had been driven oft' the island, his stock destroyed, his effects plundered, his family taken prisoners, and, as a last indignity, the commander of the guard-ship "Scorpion " ordered him to cut his wood at a certain place and nowhere else, " upon penalty of having his house burned down." Mr. Palmer's ciise was not a peculiar one. These acts of petty tyranny were universal during the occupancy by the Britisli of all parts of the coun- try. But in his case there was a special reason for the enemy's severity. He had ventured to write to General Howe a letter in vindication of the Amer- in New York City. At a later iwriwl, liiis attainder was reversed, and liin I'stati-S restored to Uia fuliiily Iiy Act of Parliament. Tlie );en>'riil veiilict of history at the jiresent time is, that lie was innocent of the i rinie for which lie wiis condeuined and executed. — (8eo Bolton's, Ban- croft's and Bryant's llistorics.) 67 icans. Our sympathies, even at this late hour, are elicited on behalf of Mr. Palmer and his fellow-suf- ferers. Their treatment was shameful and the con- duct of the British in inflicting such acts of oppres- sion upon private individuals, not in arms against them, was barbarous and indefensible. But inas- much as the petitioner afterwards removed to New York City with his family, and had besides, abun- dance of good company in his .sufferings, and since his oppressors were finally defeated and driven from the country, and he, if present, might have witnessed the hauling down of their flag on the Battery, in New York, on the 25th of November, 1783, it seems that Mr. Palmer might be content to call it square (with the British) and withdraw his petition. One hun- dred years have made a great change in the value of the "plantation " once held by him, and from which he was then driven, on City Island. If he owned it now, it would a great deal more than compensate him for all his losses in that war. The oyster business is now carried on largely there, with a cajjital of two hundred thousand dollars. The building of vessels — mostly pleasure yachts — has led to the establishment of a dock-yard, in which a number of men are em- ployed, and where some of the swiftest yachts in the country have been built. It was near City Island that a daring and success- ful enterprise was accomj)lished by a few of the Americans in the year 1777, being no less than the capture of a British gun-boat used as a guard-ship, and stationed at the mouth of East Chester Creek. The particulars, as related by one of the party engaged in the capture to an aged citizen of Pelham, now in his ninety-second year, and by him communicated to the writer, are as follows : "The guardship 'Schuldam' was one of several vessels stationed by tlio British along the shores of the Sound, through whose instrumental- ity most of tlie hardshijis complained of by the Americans, such as those referred to in tlie petition of Benjamin Palmer, were indicted. The officers and crews of these vessels often treated the inhabitants of the towns and villages along the shore with great Boverity. They were consequently regarded with no friendly feelings by the ojijiressed people, and plans for their capture were frequently discussed. ".\ party of whale-boatmen from Daiien, Connecticut, were fortunate enough to carry such a design into execution. They conveyed their boat by hand across the Neck, and took possession of the market sloop which plied regularly between Kast Chester and Now York. From the master of this slooj) they ascertained that on his weekly pas- sages to the city ho was sonietimea hailed from the guardship, and re quested to sell them fresh jirovisions, such as eggs, chickens, vegetables Ac, for which, to insure their delivery, he was liberally jiaid. These Connecticut whale-boatmen, to the number of ten or twelve, armed concealed themselves in the hold of the sloop. Their leader however remained on deck, and forced the owner to lay his craft alongside the sloop, as if for the purpose of furnishing the usual sujiplies. It was early in the morning, before daylight, and the moment the two vessels touched, the boatmen rushed up from below, boarded the British vessel and took the crew prisoners before they were fairly awake. They then comiwUed some of the prisoners to help navigate the vessel, and mak- ing sail on the prize, ran her into the port of New Loudon." There are two persons still living, one in I'elliam who witnessed and the other in New Rochelle' who 1 The Sound opposite New Bocbelle and Polbani ia a ticklish place, even 706 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. heard the sound of the cannonade between the Brit- ish men-of-war and tlie American gun-boats, which took place oflF New Eochelle and Pelham in the month of August, 1814. After the British had bom- barded Stonington (August 9th), two of their vessels^ a frigate and a sloop-of war, made their appearance near Mamaroneck. The government, or perhaps the people of New York, had prepared a fleet of thirteen gun- boats, each armed with a thirty-two-pounder gun, for the protection of the harbors along the Sound. One sultry morning in August the ships of war moved down the Sound and attacked these gun- boats, which had been ordered to rendezvous near Huckleberry Island and along the shores of Long Island. The action continued at long range for about an hour, and was very exciting to the inhabitants in the vicinity. The militia of two or three of the towns had been ordered out, and every height and headland was thronged with spectators. It soon became evi- dent that the gun-boats were no match for the men- of war. Probably all that saved them from being sunk or captured was the superior familiarity of the Americans with the navigation of the Sound. Among so many rocks and reefs, the heavy war-vessels of the British were afraid to venture, and after a shar]) but distant cannonade, in which but little damage was inflicted, the gun-boats withdrew in the direction of New York, and the ships of war returned to New London. It was in connection with this bloodless naval engagement that the panic broke out among the mili- tia on Davenport's Neck, an account of whichis given in the history of New Rochclle. The Rev. Lewis J. Cou- tant,' then a boy often or twelve years, distinctly remeni" bered to have heard the echoes of the cannonade up- on that sultry August morning, rolling and reverber- ating among the hills back of the town of New Ro- chelle. Mr. Peter Roosevelt, of Pelham, now in his ninety-second year, is understood to have witnessed the engagement from some convenient hill near the shore Hunter's Island, now the property of Mr. Iselin^ was, in the year 1800, owned by a gentleman named Henderson, a Scotchman and a surgeon in the British army. It has changed hands many times and is for navigators well acquainted with the obstructions above and below tlie surface. It is related that some years ago one of the Le Counts, who lived upon the shore in New Korhelle, near the Telham line, and hail been familiar « ith the navigation of tlie Sound in tliat vicinity from liis youth, took a party of friends out for a siil. The day was fine, the wind fair, and the passengers were delighted until the boat, under full sail, ran pluniii jipon a large flat rock about a foot under water, near the mouth of Echo Bay. As the tide was falling, it became evident that their sail for the day Wtis over. " Captain," wa« the indignant I'cuion- strance of the party, " I thought you knew every rock in this Sound." " I do," replied Cuptain L. C, "and this here is one of the woi"st." One of the Schuylers a'so, residingat Pelham, is said t(j have been thus upset while sailing in his boat near City Island. But, more lucky than the Bell who was drowned in the same manner, he was picked up by a passing vessel while calndy tloating, seated upon the bottom of his boat, and smoking his pipe, which ho had managed in some way to keep lighted. Incredible as this may seem, it is nevertheless a fai t, as 1 have been assured, and old General .'gressive sjiirit that have throughout our own century thus far ruled the course both of English and American history. A single fact recorded by Mr. Bolton in his ' History of Westchester County'' puts this inference beyond all cinestiouing : ' In the liandsdowne MSS. are eleven volumes of Dr. Pell's, written in excellent style. The first vol- ume contains a vast fund of information. resi)ecting the persecutions of the Piedmontese.' Evidently his sympathies were with the true leaders of the age ; not with the oppres.sors, but the oppressed. " In connection with a fact so significant we are not suriHised to learn that while serving the government of his country at Zurich, Mr. Pell's letters to his wife, at home, indicate minute attention to the elementary education of his only son, the future ' Lord John," of Pelham, particulariz- ing the most suitable schools, the studies and the teachers appropriate to the young scholar's situation or turn of mind, even urging spei ial care as to the style of penmanship reiniired by the boy 'eleven years old,' in danger of funning wrong habits at the outset. Four years after his many educational couuselings had been written from Zurich, while the school-life of John was still in progress, the English mission to Switzer- land was terminated, the minister was couunended, called home, and in- formed on his arrival that the Lord Protector was dying. Very soon the whole country was convulsed ; but, despite the agitations of that disas- trous period, the youthful heir of a trans- Atlantic 'Lordship,' fifteen years of age at the time of his father's return, was exceptionally favored as to his opiiortunities for receiving the best possible training under the eye of his watchful parents, who had already taken rank with the best educators of England. "Fortunately for the professor, while occupying so effectively his chair at Breda, he found it within bis power to confer personal favoraupon the exiled King, Charles II, then sojourning there. These were grate- fully remembered, and opened the way, soon after the restoration, for his being admitted into ' holy orders,' by the Bishop of London, in IfiBl, for his being honored with the degree of doctor of divinity, gifted by the crown with the rectory of Fobbing, in Essex, and afterward by the Bishop, with that of Ijavingdon, in the sanui county; all showing that the changeiff government from commonwealth to kingdom, brought to him no great distress, nor interfered with the educational interests of his family. The scholar, the diplomatist, the statesman, who had been rec- ognized throughout Europe as the representative of the Lord Protector in defence of the peojiles oppressed for conscience sake, was eminently (pmlified, of course, to tniin his only sou into sympathy with his ow n ideas and the martyr spirit of the exiles who were to seek tran.'^atlantic homes within his own lordly domain. In this timing of events the Huguenot Pilgrims discerned a divine adjustment of means to ends as real and apt as was that traced by the Israelites in the predicted exaltation of the youthful Joseph to that an- cient ' Lordship ' that prepared their way to the land of promise. Of the fine qualities of character exemplified by these heroic people, and the possibilities of their future, he was thoroughly appreciative. How dif- ferent might have been their fortunes bad he, like some leading men of the period, favored the exclusive policy of the reigning monarch by whom the manorial charter had been granted, and whose measures, ere long, rendered the English Revolution a logical necessity. But all anti- 1 Volume ii., p. 51. pathies were overruled, and in the annals of the following century we trace the gr.ulual growth of a well-ordered anil happy community, dis- tinguished by an inherited refinement of manners and a degree of intel- lectual culture that made New Roclielle of Pelham what the legal phnise of the charter designated the manor, * a place of itself;' unique ; winning to its homes and schools the best elements of family life and social advancement. At the opening of the nineteenth century, the French language, spoken in purity and elegance, still lived as the vernac- ular of home life, attracting the more progressive class of students, whereof the names of Washington Irving, John Jay, Philip Schuyler, and I louverne\tr Morris may be taken as exponents. A few who were chiMien at that period are yet living, and remember the ladies who, like ^lary Bcslie, the sister of Dr. Oliver Beslie, possessed home libraries containing the standard works of French Literature that had nourished the intellectual youth of their mothers in France. As it has been well- said by Macaulay, that the fusion of Norman and Saxon elements in the thirteenth century produced the Englami that has figured as a power in a wtirld of history, so that we may truly say that the fusion of English and French elements in this manorial tract, bought originally of the Indians by Thom;is Pell, Esq., in 16j4, confirmed by an English King, James II, iis a " lordship,'" in IfiST, produced a social growth of fine typal character, and furnished a contribution distinctively its own to the progress of American Colonial civilization. "The incidental reference by name to an excellent lady who had passed the bonier line of ' three-score and ten ' before the nineteenth century began, recalls to mind one whose image is iuisociated with my earliest memories and with my first impressions of the primitive style of the cultivated Huguenot's life and numners. Madame Beslie, while in thought I replace her amid the old surroundings in Pellham, New Roclielle anil New York, reappears in my retrospective musing as I saw her often in my school days, a queenly woman of ninety-five years, not bent by age, retaining her natural ciise and grace of movement, still able by her winning ways to draw us young folk to her side as listener to her talk while she rehearsed the memories of her youth. The younger children of the family circle, us\ially speaking of her as 'Aunt Jlollie Bayley,' were obliged, each in turn, to take a lesson on the different spellings of French words that sound alike. When her memory became unretentive of things recent, it kept fresh as ever the things long past ; hence whensoever I greeted her after jibsences of a month or week, she would place her bands upon my temples, then kissing me upon the fore- head, would pleasantly allude to the old French mode of salutation. At once, as if making a new communication, she would repeat, with an in- terest as lively as ever, the story of the exodus, the deadly persecution in France and the fate of her grandmother, who had been dragged through the streets of Paris by the hair of her head. Having ended her narrative, the turn of her familiar talk would be suggested, often by the old French book that she would happen to be holding in her hand, or by a reference to some volume or pictured page within the ghuss doors of her book case. Gifted as she was with communicative power, she was, at the same time, one of the best of listeners, calling forth from her coiupany the best they had tootfer; and, indeed, I have sometimes wondered whether the charms of her conversation were to be regarded the more eminently as an inher- ited talent, as the incidental outcome of favoring social influences, or the product of some kind of educational training that had grown into 'a second nature.' Though uncert;iin .just now as to the date of her de- jmrture from earth (not far from the close of 1817), I can truly sjiy that her beautiful example of reigned Christian womanhood has been ever be- fore me as an exponent of Huguenot character, shaping my conceptions of Huguenot home-life and keeping alive my sympathies with the spirit of Huguenot history. " Coincident with these sentiments, as to inherited culture, was the impression made upon the mind of New England by the example of pub- lic spirit exhibited in the city of Boston by a native of New Roclielle more than a century and a quarter ago. From the earliest days of the American Revolution Faneuil Hall hiis been to Boston a household word, familiar to the lips of men, women and childi'en as the memorial of Huguenot munificence, rendered classical by historic associations that quicken the pulse of patriotism and call forth the spirit of song in com- memoration of the ' cradle of liberty.' Thus the name of a Huguenot of New Rochelle has not only held a shining place in the annals of the colonial commonwealth, but lives in the nation's history as a source of inspiration, awakening memories that are an uplifting power. "Although the name of this man, thus memorialized, has been daily re. peated in the first city of New England by four or five successive gener- ations, yet his short and inspiring life-story had been permitted almost to fade away from memory until its late restoration to the popular range of home reading by the pen of Charles Smith, who has contributed a PELHAM. 711 choice chapter to the memorial history of Boston. The uncle of Peter, the fiiunder aiul ilonor of the liall, was Andrew Fanciiil, wlm fled from France t > Holhind in lt>S.">, and tlionce, as tlie reconi shows, lind l)e('onie, in Ifi'.U, a tax-i)ayer and citizen of Boston. At tlie opening; of tlie eigliteonth century lie had taken nink as the leading merchant of the city in point of wealth, trusted by all as a man of honesty and honor. His death, in 1737, seemed indeed an nntimely event. The sense of loss was universal, expressed by the jjatherinK at his grave — a procession of eleven hundred pei-sons, representatives of the whole people. His pro|»- erty was ' willed ' to his nephew Peter, who, at eijrhteen years of a*je, had left his native town, New KochcUc, and sojoxirmed for a short pe- riod in Rhode Island, wiiither he had accompanied his father, Benjamin. Proceeding thence to Boston, he entered into the service of his Vncle .\ndrew. and soon won the confidence and the love that issued in liis appv>intnient as his uncle's executor and residuary legatee. His career was brief but brilliant. Though he liveil only five yi'ai-s after his uncle's decease, he rendered that small fraction of life a tine historical episode in the municipal reconl of liistime. " In tlie year 1740 the people were divided into two parties, nearly eipial in numbers, by the di8cus.sion of a proposal to meet a public need — the erection of a central market-house. The opponents of the enter- prise were persistent, though the grounds of their action are not clearly discernible. In this state of the public mind Peter Faneuil came for- ward and offered to erect the building at his own cost, ' to be improved for a market for the sole uses, benefit and advantage of the town, pro- vided that the town of Boston would pass a vote for that purpose, and lay the s<»ine under such proper regulations as shall be thought neces- sary, and constantly support it for sjiid use.' " The selectmen called a meeting to act upon the proposal ; :ii;7 votes were cast for accepting the gift, :!fiO against it. Mr. Faneuil en- larged his plan, and over the market erected a splendid hall, capable of accommodating a thousaml persons. \t a town-meeting in the town- house, September 13, 1743, a vote wius unanimously passed accepting the gift, anil appointing a committee, consisting of the iiuxlerator of the meeting, the selectmen, the representative to the general court and six other gentlemen, ' to wait upon Peter Faneuil, Esq., and in the name of the town to render him their hearty thanks for so bountiful a gift, with their prayers that this and other expressions of his bounty ami charity limy be abundantly recompensed with the divine blessing.' "The first town-meeting held within the walls of Faneuil Hall, 1713, was the occasion for ilelivering a eulogy on the life and charai-ter of the donor by Mr. .lohn Lovell, master of the Tiatin school. In his oration Mr. Lovell said, after referring to jirivate charities, 'Let this stately edifice which bears his name witness for him what sinus he expended in public uiiiniticence. This building, erected by him at his own immense i haige, for the convenience and ornament of the tow n is incomparablv the greatest benefaction ever yet known to our western shore.' Thus Boston a century and a quarter ago gratefully di'clared to the worM that, although the Huguenot element tlid iii>t much affect the populalioii as to quantity, it was an effective fa' tor of sterling worth as to •/iinlilii, and that the finest expression of its spirit and style was to be found in the iiiagnilicent record left there by the large-souled young Ilugueiiol of Sew Kochelle. " Having ineiitioiieil the year of 5Ir. Faneiiil's deimrtiire, 1743, it may lie noted, iiicidentally, that in 1843 the celebration of our national in- dependence in Faneuil Hall awakened into new life old historic associa- tions, and imiiarted to that day's observance somewhat of the dignity of a centennial recogiiilinn. On the fourth of .(uly of that year Sir. diaries Francis .Vdaiiis delivered his first public oration, and, as had been expected, in (he lueseuce of the venerable ex-president, his fallier. Having been invited to oHiciate as chaiilain on that occasion, I repaiieil III the i-ounril chamber of the city hall half an hour before the time of forming the iirocessioii. While reclining alone upon the old-fashioned w indow-seat, enjoying its pleasjint outlook, the ex-president entered the room. Ere long, taking his seat beside nie, he touched ii|Min a few reiii- iiiiscenees of the past, and then said in a tone expressive of profound feeling, 'This is one of the happiest days of my whole life. Fifty yeai-s expire to day siui-c I [lerfonned in Boston my first public service, w hich w;is the delivery of an oration to celebrate our national inilepeiideiico .\fter a half centur)' of active life I am siwred by a benign providence to witiies.-' my Sim's performance of his first public service -to deliver an oration in honor of the same great event.' To this I answered, '5!r. President, I am well aware of the notable connection of events to which you refer, and having i-oiiiiiiitled and declaimed a iiart of your ow n gri af oration when a school boy in New York, I roiilil, w ithout elT-irl, repeal il to you now.' To 'the old man oluquent,' as well as to myself, the coincidence was uu agreeable surprise. At the close of the services con- nected with the deliveiy of the oration, the guests of the city were gath- ered at the festal banquet in. Faneuil Hall. There I was called upon us chaplain, not only to invoke the divine benediction, but to respond to a patriotic sentiment that awakened memories of the heroic dead. To me, certainly, it was an uplifting thought, that, like the founder of the hall, belonging by birth to Pelham and New Kochelle, at the end of a century from the year of its completion and his departure, I was standing in the thronged edifice that memorialized his name, alive to the significance of the position, well assured that by every uttered word I was but voicing the ideas that ho loved, that he expressed in deeds more eloquent than words, and made his record a treasured legacy. " This early colonial civilization, which we have traced from its be- ginning, w ith its style of culture so unique on account of its variety of elements fused into newly developed cliaractei^, ere long put forth a power of attraction that gathered to it and arouud it people of congenial tastes, appreciative of the social (iiialities and educational 4, her lionored liusbami, \\'illi!iiii Seton, Ksq., ilieil after a liugining illness, and whoro lior depressed spirit found relief in tho.niinistratiousof the lionian (^atholic Church, as well as in the hospitable home of the noblo soulcd Felichi. The truth is, how- ever, that the trend of her steps toward the Roman Catholic Church, strengthened by her ivstlietic tjistes, was noticed in her earlier days before she had left her native lami ; and after her return from Italy to New York sho was still a coiiiiuunieaiit of Trinity Church, for weeks, as she said, 'in an agony of suspense,' engaged in discussions, oral and written, with the liev. John Henry Ilobart, then rector of Trinity, af- terward Bishop of the Pioceso of New York, and Archbishop Carroll, of Baltimore, iu regard to the main principles of Protestantism. At that earlier perioil, her cousin, Ann Bayley, of Pelham, only eight years younger than hereelf, was living in the environment of the same relig- ious atmosphi're, keenly sympathetic, constiiiitly interchanging senti- ments as well as visits. " The leading idea that then engaged the thoughts of those two cous- ins pertained not so much to the emotive nature as to the intellectual ; for a main subject of discussion emphasi/ed in the chief pulpits of New York at that day, Wiis the relation of the sacraments to pereonal sjilva- tion. At that point the life course of the two cousins diverged. The allirmation, sometimes ehxpiently argued, that the sacraments, adniiuiti- tercu through a regular priestly succession, are the divinely apjiointed channels through wliicdi saving grace Hows forth from the fountain of life into the human soul, took the strongest possible hold upon the spirit nature of the elder cou.-iin, calling forth, even then, painful doubts over a suggested re than a century and a quarter ago, exemplifying the perfect fusion of Anglican and French elements into a vital unity, to endure thronghout centuries to come. 714 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. BIOGRAPHY. JAMES HYATT. Mr. James Hyatt, former supervisor of the town of Pelham, was a son of James H. Hyatt, who married Eliza Balcom, and resided in New York City. He was born there December 1, 1830, and was educated iu the district school, which he left at the age of fifteen to engage in the butcher business. He first entered as a clerk the shop of James Kent, in Tompkins' Market, at the corner of Sixth Street and the Bowery, New York. Here he remained dur- ing four years, at the expiration of which he removed to Mott Haven, and was engaged iu the business with his uncle there for five years. He then left Mott Haven for the town of Westchester, and en- tered the butcher store of William Cooper, which he left after five years to open a market for him- self in the same town. One year afterward he removed the concern to City Island, where he still remains. He is well known throughout Westchester, espe- cially in its political life. He is an earnest Democrat and has held several political positions, both elective and by appointment. In 1863 he was appointed board clerk of the town of Pelham, and one year later was elected to the position, being re-elected to it for seven terms. In 1873 he was elected supervisor and re-elected to the olEce eleven times successively. He was also town constable for one year, and at one time was collector of school taxes. Mr. Hyatt's consistent political life, and his earnest advocacy of correct principles in the government of his town and county, entitle him to the respect and esteem of the citizens of Westchester, wherever found. CHAPTER XVIII. WHITE PLAINS. BY JOSIAH S. MITCHELL. White Plains, the shire-town of Westchester County, was described in an act of the Legislature of the State of New York, passed in 1788,' as " All that part of the county of Westchester bounded easterly by Mamaroneck River, northerly by North Castle, westerly by Bronx River and southerly by the town of Scarsdale," and by this act was erected into a town, containing four thousand four hundred and thirty-five acres. As late as the year 1683 this territory was still in the possession of its aboriginal owners. The chiefs were sachems of the ^V^eckf]uaskech tribe, a portion of the powerful Mohican nation, whose territory lay between the Connecticut River and the Hudson, the I Greenleaf 8 Lawn, vol. ii. p. 153, Weckquaskech family occupying the more limited region between the Byram River and the Hudson. No woodman's axe had yet invaded the quietude of its forests ; but amid the leaty hedges, and beneath the sheltering branches of overhanging trees, the tawny savage and his tawny mate, rearing their black-eyed little ones in the primitive simplicity of their remotest ancestors, remained the sole human inhabitants of the soil. But now the hum of civilization is beginning to be heard on their borders. The irrepressible and irre- sistible New Englander, advancing with rapid strides, having in 1666 settled Rye as far as the Mamaroneck River, in 1683 purchased the better country lying between that river and the Bronx, and called by the natives, Quarroppas, — by the settlers the White Plains, — the deed of which to the people of Rye is as follows : "To all Christian peopell to horn these presence shall coui greting ' ' Know jee that we Shapliam, Cockenseco, Orewapum, Kewetoahan, " Koawanoh I'aatck Shiphatlash, Korehevuvous, panawok, niemishott, " pesi'kanoh, oromahgah, patthunk, hohoreis, sotonge, wonawaking, " owhorawas noshand have for a valnabell sum of money to us in hanj " paid by the town of Kye that are iuhabitance bargained covinanted, " ailuated and souUd unto the Iuhabitance of the above said town of " Ry, A sartaiu tract of laud Lying within the towu bounds of Rye " Houndeil iis followeth on the north east with JIamarineik River, and " on the Southwest with a branch of the said River and marked trees " till it comes to bruuckes River and then to Runn by Rrunches River " till it Comes to the head of the whit plaines soe called, and by the "marked trees from theuce till it comes to the uppermost branch of ' ' marinneck River, which trackt of Land commonly called by the Kng- " lish the whit plaines and called by the Indians Quaroppas which said " tract of Land woe the above said shapham, Cockiucecko, orewapiini, " kewetoahan, koawanoh, luoahalice and the Rest of the above said " Indians have soulled as above said unto the Inhabitjince of the s,iid " town of Rye them theire heires execatai-s administrators or asignes for " ever and Doe hereby bind ourselves our heires Exectars .\dministratare " and assigns unto the Inhabitance of the above said town of Rye them " Iheire heires Execatars adniiuistratars or asignes that they may at " all times from and after the date hereof peasably and quieatly poses " occupy and enjoy the above said tract of land free from all former " liargaiiies salles morgages or other incombmnces vdiatso ever and " all soe to warrant and make good the above said salle against any par- " son or parsons whatso ever tliat shall or will make or lay any clainie or " i lainies theare unto and In teastimony theareof wee have caused " this bill 6f salle to be made and here unto haue sett our hands and " sealles this two and twentieth of November one thousand six hundred " Eighty three. " Sealed, signed and delivered in the presents of us " Corneilass the marku of his marke Shapham .Joshua Kuapp Cokenseko the marke of (>ruwai.mm Motepeatehou Kewctoham Koawanoh John Odell BIoahpoato 2 O'Callaghan, 455. " 2 O'Callaghan, 505. 718 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Chester be annexed to Connecticut. Thus, one after another, the Dutch abandoned every point their enemies assailed; the Connecticut River had been given up, and now Westchester and shortly afterward Long Island were relinquished. On March 22, 1664,' Charles II. granted to his brother, the Duke of York, the whole of Long Island and all the country in the possession of the Dutch. To secure the conquest of the district in question, the Duke of York organized an expedition to take pos- session of the country, and appointed Richard Nichols his Deputy Governor, with authority to estab- lish and maintain his government and to settle boundaries. In the latter part of August- the ships carrying the Governor and his forces anchored near Fort Amsterdam ; on the 29th Nichols sent to the fort a summons to surrender, and on Monday morn- ing, September 8th, the Dutch marched out of the fort and the English marched in. Fort Amsterdam was named Fort James, New Netherlaud became New York, and a few days later Fort Orange, having also surrendered, received the name of Albany ; and the Dutch sway in America was at an end. On the 30th of the following November the bound- ary between New York and Connecticut was settled as follows: "We also order and declare that the Creek or River called Maniaroneck, which is reputed to be about twelve miles to the east of Westchester, and a line drawn from the East point or side where the fresh water falls into the salt at high-water mark, North-Northwest to the line of Massachusetts, be the Westward bounds of the said Colony of Connecticut, and all plantations lying Eastward of that Creek ^ and line to be under the government of Connecticut." This north-northwest line from the mouth of Mania- roneck River continued to be the eastern boundary of New York; and the White Plains were thereby in- cluded in the province of Connecticut. Resuming the consideration of title, we find that the Indian deed to John Richbell, [)urported to con- vey three necks of land, aud included most of the present town of Maniaroneck. The deed was as fol- lows : " I, Wompoqueum, together witli my brother Mahatahaii, being the right owners of three necks of land, lying and being bounded on the east side with Maniaroneck, aud on the west side with stony river, which [Mirts the said lands from Mr. I'elPs purcli.isc ; now tliese are to certify to all and Everyone whom it may concern, that I, Wompoqueum, did by myself, and in behalf of my aforesaid brother JIaliatahan, firmly bar- gain and sell to Mr. John Kichbell, of Oyster B.-vy, to him and his heirs forever, the above-mentioned three necks of land, together with all otiier privileges thereunto belonging, six ^yeeks before I sold it to Mr. Kevell (Pell) and did mark out the bounds, and gave Mr. Richbell pos- session of said land, and did receive iMirt of my pay in liand, as witness niy hand. " The mark of Wopoqueum. " Witness, J.\cOB Yough, Catharine Tocgh."* From the time of Richbell's purchase down to October Ki, 1668, he was engaged in a constant dis- pute with Thomas Pell in regard to the boundaries of their respective purchases. This difficulty having finally been settled, a patent of the last-mentioned date was issued by Governor Lovelace to Richbell, wherein the land granted is described as follows : "Whereas there is a certain parcel or tract of land n-ithiii this govern- ment, >ipon the main, contained in three necks, of which the Eastermost is bounded with a small river, called Maniaroneck river, being also the esist bounds or limits of this government upon the main, and the wester- most, with the gravelly or stoney brook or river, wliich makes the ejist limits of the land, known, by the name of Mr. Pell's purchase. Having to the South the Sound and running northward from the marked trees upon the ssiid neck, twenty miles into the woods, wliich said parcel of laud, &c., &c." It will be noticed that the Indians sold to John Richbell only three necks of land, their sale and con- veyance not including the " twenty miles into the woods," which seems to have gotten into the Rich- bell patent without the pre-requisite of purchase from the original proprietors. '2 O'Callaghau, 516. I 2 Bryant, 262. 3 Boundaries of the State of New York, 25. * Westchester Kecords A, page 238. WHITE PLAINS. 719 However, the lands granted by this patent were " within this government " (New York), and the patent did not attempt to, and of course, could not convey lands in the colony of Connecticut, or beyond the boundary line which ran from the mouth of Mamaroneck River north-northwest. By deed dated April 23, 1669, John Richbell con- veyed to John Ryder, as trustee for Ann Richbell, his wife, — " All that certain psircel or tract of land, where ho now lives, called the East Neck, and to begin at the westward part thereof at a certain cri'ek lying, being and adjacent, by and betwixt the neck of land com- monly called the Great Xeck and the East Neck, and so to run eastward as far as Mamaroneck river, including therein betwixt tlio two lines all the land as well north into the woods above Westchester iiatli, twenty miles, as the land below the path, south and towanls the river, iScc." 1 Next in order of time was the purchase of the White Plains from the Indian proprietors by the inhabitants of the town of Rye. The deed, set forth in full above, bears date November 22, 1684. That the jiurchase wi\s followed by actual occupation is shown by the fact that Mr. Richbell, in a petition to Governor Dongan, dated JIarcli 12, 1()83, prays the Governor " to grant an order to clear the same " — L e. the White Plains. The inhabitants of Rye were ac- cordingly summoned to show cause at the next Court of Assize in Westchester County " wiiy the saitl lauds do not of right belong to John Richbell." - It does not appear how the suit was determined; certainly not in favor of Richbell's claim, as the possession of the land by the Rye people seems from that time to have been uninterrupted and their right un- ijucstioncd. By a deed dated December 23, 1697, acknowledged :\Iarch 22, 1698, Ann Richbell, widow of John Rich- bell, convej's all her estate and rights in and to the East Neck and twenty miles north into the woods, to Caleb Ileathcote, of Westchester.-' This conveyance recites the deed from John Richbell to John Ryncr in trust for Ann Richbell, above referred to. It is by virtue of these conveyances that Caleb Ileathcote be- came seized of the lands embraced in his patent granted in 1702. By the close of the year 1697 White Plains had already, in a measure, become settled ; the street now known as ISruadway was laid out, and home-lots upon it built iii)on. The esust part of the house which late- ly stood northago 47. 'Westchester County Keconls B, piige 371. < Westchester County Keconls F, jiages 74 and 170. i Council Minutes, Albany. years they had looked for the same; "but the said persons have and do refuse to satisfy your petition- ers, and have more land than ever was sold to them," and praying that " John Pell and the heirs of Rich- bell may be ordered to satisfy your petitioners, and that they may have no more laud than was ever sold unto them." What action, if any, was had upon this l)etition does not appear, and we hear no more of claims by the Indians. Soon after this time Colonel Heathcote petitioned the Governor and Council, praying that the title to his lands might be confirmed, and the same erected into a manor, by the name of the Manor of Scai-s- dale; whereupon the Lieutenant Governor, Naufan, and Council, directed a writ to issue to the high- sherifl' of Westchester County, to inquire what dam- age such patent could be. The writ was issued, with a proviso, that it "Shall not give the said Colonel Ileathcote any further title than that which he already hath to the laud called White Plains, which is iu dis- pute between the said Caleb Ileathcote and the inhabitants of the town of Rye. The sheriff returned that the 'jurors found there is no damage to the King or his subjects in erecting the manor aforesaid, except the White Plains, which are in dispute and contest between said Caleb Ileath- cote and the tow n of Kyc, and excepting James Mott and the rest of the purchasers of Maniaroueck, which have land within the patent of Kich- bell.'" After the return of this writ, and on the 21st of JIarch, 1701, letters patent were issued; the lands of Colonel Heathcote vvere erected into the lordship and Manor of Scaredale. The letters, however, con- tained an express provision that nothing therein contained "shall be construed, deemed or taken to give the said Colonel Heathcote any further title or jurisdiction within the said White Plains until the same shall happen to belong to the said Caleb Heath- cote." " Soon after this. Colonel Heathcote purchased of certain Indians their rights to the lands embraced in his patent. With this excepti(jn, he did nothing further to perfect his title to the While Plains ; but he persistently refused the solicitations of the Rye people to relinquish his claims, and thereby remove the cloud upon the title to this coveted inheritance. After long years of delay, Daniel Brundage and Josei)h Hunt, on the 28th day of June 1721, presented a petition ' to the Governor, praying tor a warrant of survey of the White Plains, and a warrant was i.-;sued the same day. * No report of a survey having been made, the same parties, on the 7th day of December, 1721, petitioned for a new warrant of survey to em- brace the whole of the White Plains apon which the I following order was issued. : " Now York, Deer, ye 7"', 1721. — Ordered that a Warrant do issue to the Surveyor-General for surveying all lands ungranted by the Crown in and alniut the White Plains, and that he descrilie and ascertain the pre- tensions of Daniel Brundage and Samuel Hunt in and about the same. "> Book of Patents, .\lbany, vol. vii. page 220. ' liand Papers, .MlMiny, viii. jKige 44. e ordered as your E.\cellency and Council shall think fit lor ascertaining the limits and bounds of the said tract and of the several possessions of your petitioners. And your peti- tioners will ever pray, Ac." On this petition is indorsed, — " The Petition of Joseph Budd, et al., being read ye 21st Deer., 1721 Is referred to the Gentl. of the Council or any five of them." " The same day the Council reported tliat they had considered the matter of the })eti- tion and dire'ctedtliat a warrant sliould issue to the surveyor-general to survey the tract in question and make return thereof, with a map of the tract, and furthermore that all parties claiming any lands which are patent- ed, adjoining thereto, should have notice of the survey, with the time and place of begin- ning the sanie.^ Before the issuing of this warrant a re- port' of survey, made by Robert Crookc, dep- uty surveyor, was filed (December 23, 1721), which is valuable as being more definite and specific in courses, distances and monuments than the Golden survey and report subse- quently made under the last-mentioned order and incorporated into the patent. No action appears to have been taken on this report of the Council, made December 21, 1721, until the 10th of January following, when a warrant w:is issued, reciting all the material statements in the petition, and di- recting the surveyor-general " to survey the said White Plains ; and in his return thereof to ascertain and des- cribe the particulars of the claims of the petitioners, with a map of the said tract, and that the said petition- ers give timely notice of said survey to all patentees whos grants they are informed joyne to the said White Plaii's." 1 Land Papers, Albany, viii. 89. 2 Land Papere, Albany, viii. page 91. 3 Land Papers, Albany, viii. jiage 91. 4 Laud Papers, Albany, viii. page 92. This warrant was indorsed by Cadwallader Golden, surveyor-general to William Foster, deputy surveyor, who proceeded to execute it. He completed the sur- vey and made his report, in which he first describes the land generally, as in the patent ; afterward he bounds the tracts by streams, monuments, courses and distances. He also made a map of the White Plains, a copy of which is here shown. MAP OF WHITE PLAINS IN 1721.* A-Caleb Hyatt's. B-Joseph Purdy's. C-Humphrey rnderhill's. 1)-Samuel Moriit's. E-Saninel Hunt's. F-Samuel Hunt's Mill. G-Samuel Holt's. H-,lohn Iloit's. I-George Lane's. K-Daniel Brundige's. L-.Iames Travis's. M-SIoses Knapp's. E.XPLANATION. N-Jolin Hyat's. 0-Danicl Lane's. P-Samuel Horton's. Q-Christopher Yeoman's. R-Anthony Miller's. S & T-Dauiel Brundige's bound trees. U-The beginning of Mr. Bridges' patent. V-Tlie bound tree between Um- phrey Underbill and Samuel Hunt. ^ Copy of a map of White Plains found in the office of the Secretary. WHITE- a-Roail t(i Maiuaroneck. f-Road to Bedford. b-Road to East Chester. g-Road to Califoruia patent. c-Road up to the woods. h-Road to Rye. d-Koad to Hudson's ferry. i-Road to Budd's Neck. e-Roiid to Phillips' mills. The report of William Foster, ' and the interesting map made from his survey, were filed February 21, 1722. On the 24th of the same month the matter of the petitioners was brought before the Council for consideration, when the jiroceedings took place of which the following is a partial report : " M a Committee of the Council held at New York, Feb'y 2i, 1721-2, Present, — " Capt. Walters. Jlr. Harrison. Coll. Beekman. ilr. Coldcn. Sir. Van Dam. Mr. Lewis Jlorris, Jr. "The Committee proceeded upon the Surveyor General's return of the claims of Joseph Budd & al. in the "White Plains Purchase, Referred to them. ■'The Committee unanimously chose Francis Harrison, Esq., their chairman. " Resolved that all parties concerned be called in. Then all parties attending were heard as to their several claims. The parties withdraw- ing, the several papere relating to the affair were read." The proceedings at this meeting related solely to the claims of Hunt and Brundage. The committee met again on Februaiy 2(3th,' when the Hunt and Brundage claims were passed upon and confirmed, as shown on the map. The following resolution was then adopted : " K'snh td, yt ye Remaining part of ye White Plains after the lands of Hunt and Brundage be laid out according to ye former Resolution, be granted to Joseph Budd, John Hoit, Caleb Hyat, Huniplirey l iiderhill, Joseph Purdy, George Lane, Daniel Laue, Muses Knapp. John Horton, David Horton, Jonathan Lynch, Peter Hatfield, James Travis, Isaac Covert, Benjamin Brown, John Turuer, Dfviil Ogden aud William Yeonians, saving to all persons any Right wci" they may have within the Tract of ye White Plains, founded ujion ye title set forth in ye Petition of the alwve-named Persons Praying for a Patent of ye land now in- tendeil to be granted. " Ilesolc'd, that the t^uit Rent be conformable to his ilaties Royal In- structions." On the same day (February 2(3, 1722), the chairman, Francis Harrison, reported that the committee had considered the claims of all the parties concerned in the White Plains, and after setting forth the rights of of state at Albany, in vol. viii. of Land Papers, p. 124, and entitled ' ' Return of a survey of the White Plains, Feb. 24, 1721-2. .\lso, survey for Hunt and Brundige and dated JIarch foil. Read and referred to ye Gentl. of ye Council or any five of them." The return, accompanying the map states that, " Pursuant to a warrant dated January lltli, 1721, endorsed to William Forster, Deputy Surveyor, he surveyed the Bounds of ye White Plains as they were shown to him by Joseph Budd, John Hoit, Vniphrey Underbill, George Lane, Jloses Knap ami Caleb Hyatt, and they were as follows : " Beginning at a large white oak tree marked with several letters, where t wo bi^ooks falls into ye west branch of Moniaroncck River ; thence by marked trees to Brunxes river near tu where a small bnxik falls into said river, by a bush of .\lders, some of which are marked ; thence up Brunxes river to an Ash tree about 17 chains above Anthony Miller's Fulling Mill, and thence by marked trees to a white oak near Long Meadiiw Brook ; then down said Brook to where it falls into Momaro- neck River, and then down said River to the place where ye west Branch falls into the river, and then up the said Branch to ye white oak where we began — Containing 5225 acres, after 5 per cent, deducted for Roads." ' Land Papers, .\lbany, viii. page 124. 5 N. Y. Col. MSS., Ixiv. page 2',i. ^N. Y. Col. MSS., Ixiv. page 30. 69 PLALXS. 721 Hunt and Brundage, recommended "That the re- maining part of the White Plains, after the lands of Hunt and Brundage be laid out as before mentioned, be granted to Joseph Budd, John Hoit " and the others named in the above resolution, subject to the saving clause therein contained. The report is in- dorsetl, " March ye 1st, 1721-2. Reported and approved of by the Council, J. 8. Bolin, D. CI. Coun." ' In compliance with this report, Cadwallader Colden, the surveyor-general, " laid out for Joseph Budd, John Hoit " and the others, " \ certain tract or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of Westchester, and is commonly known by the name of White Plains. Beginning at a large White-oak tree, marked with several let- ters, where two brooks fall into the West branch of Mamamneck river, and runs thence by markeil trees to Brun.\es River, near to the place where a small brook falls into the sjiid River by a bunch of .\ldei-s, soma of which are marked. Thence up the stream of lirunxes River to an oak-tree about seventeen chains, above Anthony Miller's fulling-mill. Thence by marked trees to a White-oak marked, near Long 3Ieadow Brook. Thence ilown the stream of the said Brook to the land laid out for Daniel Brundage ; thence along his line to the siiid Long Meadow Brook ; thence down the stream of the said brook to the place where it falls into JIamaroneck River and down the stream of said River to the land granted to Christopher Bridge ; then along his lines and the lines of the land laid out for Samuel Hunt to Mamaroneck River; then down the stream of the said River to the place where the West Branch falls into the said River, and then ui) the stream of the said West Branch to the place where it began, containing four thousand four hundred and thirty five acres, with all allowance for highways. "Given under my hand, at New York, the tenth day of March, in the eighth year of his Majesty's Reign, .\nno Dom. 1721. " C.VDW.\LL.\DER COLDEX, Slir. Geil/." On the 13th day of March, 1721-2, a royal patent was granted to Joseph Budd and the other persons named in the preceding resolutions and in the report of the surveyor-general, which letters patent recited the petition of Budd and his as.sociates, and the pro- ceedings subsequent thereto, and granted, ratified and confirmed unto the said petitioners, — (naming them), their heirs and a.ssigns, " All that said tract or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the County of Westchester, which is commonly k nown by the name of the White Plains," and described as in the report of Cadwallader Colden, surveyor-general.^ For forty-five years the marks and monuments indi- cating the boundaries of the White Plains purchase had been carefully renewed and preserved.* For twenty years Colonel Heathcote had i)ersistently re- fused the solicitations of the Eye people for an ad- justment of the dirt'erences growing out of his un- founded claims. Now that Heathcote was dead, and his powerful influence with the Governor and Council no longer stood between the people and their rights, it only remained for them to .submit to the e.xcessive exactions of the Governor and Council before their territory should be finally confirmed to them. Three times were they compelled to make surveys of their goodly land,— three times required to notify the owners of adjoining lands that such surveys were about to be * Land Papers, vol. viii. page 126. 'Book of Patents, .\lbany, vol. viii. page 450. « Baird's Rye, lofi. 722 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNT\. made, and all to furnish pretexts for oppressive charges by the oflScers of the Governor's Council. But at length the royal jiatent was obtained and the long coutroversy was ended ; the cloud that had so long hung, like an evil omen, over the title to the White Plains, — forever disappeared, and the sun of prosperity once more shone brightly on the land and its people. Many of the most enterprising citizens of Rye removed to White Plains, and at the present day some branches of nearly all the ancient families are more numerously represented in White Plains than in the parent settle- ment. The patent was obtained for the benefit of all the owners of the White Plains lands, although but one- half of them were named as patentees ; and in order to establish the rights of the other owners, the paten- tees executed a conveyance to Joseph Horton, Sr., Joseph Horton, Jr., John Travis, James Travis, Jr., Solomon Yeomans, John Hyat, Thomas Travis, Jon- athan Purdy, Monmouth Hart, Abraham Smith, Robert Travis (son of Philip), Daniel Horton, Jona- than Horton (son of Jonathan Horton), Nathaniel Baylie, Caleb Horton, John Rockwell, Samuel Merritt and Still John Purdy, in which their rights were declared, and whereby the patentees quit- claimed " to the said grantees, their several and sei)arate heirs and assigns forever, all such right, title, interest and demand as the said grantors, or any of them, have, by virtue of said patent, in or to the lands heretofore laid out to the said grantees, and the proportionate share of such lands as are yet undi- vided." This conveyance bears date January 18, 1722, and is recorded in Westchester County register's office, in Liber G of Deeds, page 393. It is from the parties to this instrument that all the titles to the White Plains lands are derived, and through them the chain of title to much of the real property in the town may be traced, link by link, from the aboriginal proprietors to the present owners. At the time this patent was issued Broadway, with its home-lots, had long been established. The old house but lately torn down, north of Mr. William R. Brown's, was then owned and occupied by Daniel Brundage. It was erected i)rior to 1697 by Samuel Odell- George Lane — "gentleman" — removed from Rye to White Plains as early as 1714; his iiouse was on what i* now the Squire j)lace, and his brother Dan- iel lived opposite, near the ])resent residence of Elisha Horton, Esq. ; Moses Kna])p's liouse was on the road in front of the Mitchell homestead ; James Travis occupied a house on what is now Mr. Tiiford's place. The old Jacob Purdy house, standing to-day on Spring Street, between Mott and Water Streets, was built by Sauuiel Horton, a son of Josej)!! Horton, and grandson of Barnabas Horton, the first of that name in this country, who settled in Southold, Long Island, al)0ut 1(;40. On the rising ground east of the residence of Mr. Oiiderdonk, on North Street, was the house of Joseph Purdy, and a few rods further east was the house of Caleb Hyatt, both prominent in the early history of the town. Caleb Hyatt, with his brother John, re- moved from Rye to White Plains about 1715. John Hyatt's house stood near the present residence of Mr. Charles Horton. Humphrey Underhill's house was on the west side of Mamaroneck River, some distance north of the North Street road; his was one of the first houses erected in White Plains, probably before 1694, as in October of that year Mrs. Ann Richbell procured a warrant from the Governor to survey the easternmost bounds of her lands. The surveyor, Augustine Gra- ham, proceeded along the west bank of Mamaroneck River until he came to the " improved land claimed by Humphrey Underbill, where the said Underbill, with three others, with guns, stones and staves did obstruct the execution of his Excellency's warrant." Mr. Underbill was a man of high standing in the estimation of his townsmen, and Dr. Baird supposes he was a son of the famous Captain John Underbill. On the hill west of Humphrey Underbill, and near the road, stood the house of Samuel Merritt ; about a quarter of a mile north of Merritt's, and near the present residence of Mr. Seymour, was the house of the patentee Samuel Hunt ; he had a tract of three hundred and eighty acres, and a mill on Mamaroneck River, easterly from his house. Northerly, on the same North Street road, were the residences of John and Samuel Hoit, active men in town afi'airs, who in 1726-27 were leaders in building the Presbyterian Church. On the north side of the road crossing Bronx River, near Mr. Champanois' residence, was the house of Christopher Yeomans ; Anthony Miller lived where the Misses Tompkins' housestands, north of the cemetery, and his fulling-mill was on the brook, south of the house. These were all the houses in White Plains at the date of the patent, and all the occu]iants were men of sufficient education to read and write. So rapidly did the poi)ulation increase, that, in 1725, the inhabitants assumed an independent or- ganization, elected officers and proceeded to man- age their own afliiirs. Some of the good people had held office in Rye before removing to White Plains, and official positions, cither civil or military, were re- garded, in those days, as post** of honor to which all good citizens should aspire. The first in importance and most lasting in tenure was the position of clerk; and for fifty consecutive years the duties con- nected with that office were discharged by Caleb Hyatt. In 1726 the Rev. John Walton, a graduate of Yak- College, and a lay preacher, purchased a farm which was bounded on the north by the road to Dobbs Ferry, which ran a few feet north of the present Presbyterian Church, and on the south by land then of Jonathan Lane, now of Elisha Horton, and the % p) w o D m c o r^: r r > < ^ WHITE PLAINS. 723 south side of Railroad Avenue. Mr. Walton was a mau of great activity. On the Sabbath he preached; during the rest of the week he devoted himself with energy to the carrying on of divers secular enter- prises. He donated the land where the Presbyterian Church now stands ; and it was mainly through his eflbrts that a church was erected there in 1727. The houses of the first settlers were small, and of but a single story. The furniture was scant and sim- ple; each room, even the kitchen, contained a bed; a cupboard held the household dishes, which were mostly wooden ; a few only, of pewter, were kept and handed down as heirlooms from generation to gener- ation. Several wooden chests did double duty as re- ceptacles of the family bedding and clothing, and as chairs, which, if not remarkably comfortable, were at least solid and substantial; these, with a rude bench or stool, constituted the furniture of an ordinary farm-house. Carpets there were none, even on the spare room; but excellent feather-beds and pillows, the pride of every good housewife, were never want- ing. A great fire-place, ten or twelve feet wide and three or four feet deep, formed one side of every kitchen, which was also the sitting-room of the fam- ily. In the best room the family Bible was carefully kept and daily used. The clothing was no less sim- ple aud durable than the furnishing; all linen and woolen clothing was home-made, spun and woven in the house; garments of leather, made chiefly from the skin of the bear or other wild animal, were in common use. The life of the settlers was one of constant toil the father, with his stalwart sons, cleared the forest and tilled the virgin soil, while the busy wife and daughters, in addition to the daily cares of the house- hold, spun the yarn and made the garments for the family. Little or no money was to be found any- where; those articles which their own industry and skill did not supply were obtained by barter, chiefly of cattle and wood. One of the first acts of this little community was to build a school-house. When it was raised and where it stood are interesting questions to which the utmost research does not vouchsafe answers. At any rate, it had grown old or dilapidated in 1737-8; for at a meet- ing of freeholders held in that year it was resolved that "the public pound should be where the old school-house stood." The new school-house was built on the highway, at the northwest corner of the Squire place, and remained there nearly a century. It was a fundamental law of the New Haven juris- diction "'that the sonnes of all the inhabitants shall " be learned to write a ledgible hand as soone as they " are capable of it." And when, in 1664, the New Haven colonj' came under the jurisdiction of Connec- ticut, the law still read much the same, — "Tlie Select men of every town and precinct wliere they dwell, shall 4iave a vigilant eye over theii' Iirethrt-n and neitjliburs, to see, hint, that none «f them shall sntTer so much barbitrisni in any of their families as not to endeavor to teach, by themselves or otliers, their children and ap- jirentices to read the Knglish tongne, under penalty of twenty shillings for each neglect therein. " It was under the influence of such wholesome laws that the founders of White Plains erected the first school-house in which their children were to be edu- cated; and it is but justice to this intelligent people to say, that the public records prove that, with very few exceptions, the proprietors of White Plains could both read and write. And yet it is of these people Colonel Heathcote wrote, from Scarsdale, under date of November 9, 1705, — '* I dare aver that there is not a much greater necessity of liaving the (Jliristian religion preachetl any wliere than amongst them ; many, if not the greater number of them, being a little better than in a state of heath(^nisin.'' ' At another time (1704) he writes, — " When I first came among them (li>S)2) I found it (Westchester) the most heathenish county I ever saw in my whole life which called them- selves C'hristian, there being not so much as the least marks or footsteps of religion of any sort, Sundays being the only time set apart by them for all manner of vain spoils and lewd ilivei"sions." The Rev. Mr. Pritcher also, who, by the warrant of that imbecile aristocrat, Governor Cornbury, had been put in possession of the dissenting church property in Rye, writes, in 1704, — " I nuist not omit to inform you that his Excellency, my Lord Corn- bury, is pleased to show an unparalleled zeal for the carrying on of that great and glorious design of propagating the faith and settling the Church as well in this as in othere of His Majesty's plantations, thereby rescuing them from the grossest ignorance, stupidity aud obstinacy, and therein righting them in those damnable and dangerous tenets which have been imbued and instilled into their poor, unwary, deluded souls by blind, ignorant and illiterate guides." It may not be significant, but it is certainly worthy of note, that in the large volume of these letters, la- boriously collected by Mr. Bolton, we find so much mention of proi)agating " the faith," and " the Church," and so little of propagating the Gospel, — so frequent requests for prayer-books and catechisms, and so very few for Bibles. These reproachful accusations should have been allowed to sleep in oblivion, but when we read in an historical discourse in our day, that it was "this moral condition of things which led to the pas- sage, on the 24tb of March, 1673, of the act entitled, ' An Act for settling a Ministry and raising a main- tenance for them, in the city of New York, counties of Westchester, Richmond and Queens,' " a brief state- ment of the facts, in relation to the passage of this law and its subsequent enforcement, seems proper. A few months previous to the passage of this act there arrived in New York Benjamin Fletcher, with a commission as Governor (recalled in 1698 to answer numerous charges of mal-administration), and Caleb Heathcote. The Governor came with special instruc- tions to introduce the Book of Common Prayer among the Presbyterians, Huguenots and Dutchmen, > Bolton's " Church History," 158. 724 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. where, perhaps, James II. would have been glad to have introduced a Mass-Book.' Governor Fletcher proposed to the Assembly " that provision be made by law for the settlement and support of an able min- istry,'' but the majority of the Assembly were Dissen- ters and not inclined to aid him in his schemes. At the next following session of the Assembly the Speaker, Mr. James Graham, who had the drawing of all their bills, so managed the title and induction of this one, that, although it did not do very well for the Dissenters, yet it did not appear to make any conces- sions to the Church, and the honest, simple-minded Dissenters, not suspecting the fraud and trickery of the Governor, passed the bill as above entitled. As Colonel Lewis Morris wrote, in a letter to the Propa- gation Society, " It was the most that could be got at the time, for had more been attempted, the Assembly had seen through the artifice, and all had been lost." The bill having become a law, the Governor in- sisted that there was no ministry but of the Church of England, and declared that under this act, all lands in towns, that had been set aside for ministers' par- sonages or for meeting-houses, became vested in the English ministry.' Colonel Morris relates a conversation which he heard between the Governor and a dissenting minis- ter at the time this act of the Assembly was talked of. The minister said " that the intention of the Legislature was to raise a maintenance for a dissent- ing minister, all the Assembly but one being Dis- senters, and knowing nothing of the church, and that being the intention of the law-makers, was the mean- ing of the law, and he hoped the Dissenters might enjoy what was so justly their due, or at least not be deprived of it without due course of law." I told him the Legislature did not consist of the Assembly only, but of the Governor and Council joined with them ; and I believed it was most certain the Governor never intended to settle a dissenting clergy.^ In the spring of 1695, the Assembly, in explanation of the act, declared that churches have power to call a dissenting Protestant minister, and that he be maintained as the act directs ; but the Governor re- jected this interpolation of the Assembly, and decided that the act applied solely to the Episcopal ministry.^ Governor Fletcher was so occupied with schemes for money-making that he neglected the afiairs of the church, and in 1698 he was recalled to answer for his misconduct. Fletcher's successor was the kindlier Earl of Bellamont, an Irish i)eer, with a sound heart and honorable sympathies for popular freedom; his death, however, interrupted the short period of harmony in the colony.^ Bellamont was succeeded in 1702 by Lord Corn- 1 3 Bryant, 26. 2 " Doc. History of New York," vol. iii. page 24.5 ; Bolton's " Church History." xvi. ^Bolton's "Church History," xvii. 4 Bolton's " Church History," xvii. 5Bryant31. bury, a disreputable cousin of Queen Anne, who only escaped jail by quitting the kingdom. Cornbury was as zealous in behalf of the church as he was destitute of any sense of public or private virtue. His zeal was not for religion, but for the established Church of England. To him a Dissenter was intolerable, un- worthy of mercy or even of justice. The act of 1693 had not been oj^pressively enforced against the Rye people until after the arrival of Lord Cornbury ; but now, with a willing, nay even anxious, Governor, Colonel Heathcote could revenge himself upon this people for thwarting him in his attempt to include the White Plains within his patent.* He had been ten years in this country, and the dissenting clergy of Rye had not been interfered with ; it was not until after 1701 that he declares that " these people are heathenish Sabbath-breakers and without religion of any sort." Rye submitted quietly to these exactions for the support of the English clergy, but the White Plains people refused to pay, and only did so when threat- ened with being sold out or imprisoned under exe- cution. This forced tax upon the slender means of the dissenters continued until the War of the Revolution ; and a history that ignored the relig- ious element in that war, or placed a low estimate upon the moral forces that stood behind and sustained the opposing parties in that great struggle, would be false and worthless. The year 1729 brought with it an important acqui- sition to the wealth of the White Plains in the arrival of Moses Owen, who purchased the farm then lately owned by the Rev. Edmund Ward, embracing all the land between Railroad Avenue and Spring Street west of Broadway, excepting the church grounds. The new-comer was soon honored with the office of "Pounder," and for more than thirty years he held various positions in the town. He built the house afterwards occupied by William Barker for more than half a century prior to his death. This house is still standing, in good condition, on Spring Street, near the old Purdy house. The Owen farm passed by will to Moses Owen, Jr., who covered it with mortgages, under which it was divided into two parcels and after- wards sold. From 1730 to 1740 the leaders in White Plains affairs were Caleb Hyatt, Sr., Caleb Hyatt, Jr., Francis Purdy, Moses Owen, Gabriel Lynch, James Gedney, Daniel Knapp, George Merritt, John Turner, Jacob Griffin, Samuel Hunt, Daniel Cornell, Robert Travis, Jona- than Purdy, Daniel Horton and George Lane. From 1740 to 1750 some of these names disappear from the records of the annual meetings, and new names take their places and become prominent. Such are Peter Hatfield, William Anderson, John Hosier, Joshua Hatfield, Abraham Hatfield, Benjamin Knapp, Elisha Hyatt, Henry Purdy, Samuel Thorn, Nehe- miah Tompkins, John Ray and Bartholomew Gedney. 6 Patent, 17jl. WHITE PLAINS. 725 The freeholders were careful to keep a record of the bounds and limits of the lands of each owner, and two of the citizens best qualified for that purpose were api)ointedto prepare such a recoi-d. In 1751 the first record had become worn and torn, and Caleb Hyatt was allowed twelve shillings for copying it in a new book. In the last year of this decade there came to the town from Woodbury, in Connecticut, Dr. Robert Graham, a young physician of genius and enterprise, son of the Rev. John Graham, a Scotch clergyman, who wa^ himself the son of one of the Marquises of Montrose. Dr. (irraham, in 174t>, purchased the farm on which Mr. Samuel Faile now lives. He at once became interested in the welfare of the town, and for more than thirty years was the ruling spirit in all matters of public interest. His energy, enterprise and learning, inspiring the peoi)le with new vigor, soon raised White Plains to prominence in the county. In the records of proceedings at the annual meetings for the next ten years we find some newnames, among tliem that of Isaac Oakley, from Westchester, who, in 174<), purchased the farm now known as the Asylum Farm. Another was Monmouth Hart, a son of Mon- mouth Hart, of Rye Neck, whose farm was east of the l)resent residence of Bartholomew Gedney. He was a great-grandson of Edward Hart, one of the early settlers of Flushing, Long Island (then called by the Dutch " Vissengen"). Edward Hart, whom Governor Stuyvesant arrested and imprisoned as the author of a spirited remonstrance against an order of Stuyves- ant, which required the people of Vissengen to cease giving countenance to the Quakers. It was about the same time that John Fisher, the first of that family, settled in White Plains, on the south side of the road leading east out of Broadway, near the cemetery ; he died in 1771. Another name that appears prominently about this time was that of Joseph Lyon, who lived in North Street ; his ancestors early came to Rye from Stamford. • It was chiefly through the efforts of Dr. Robert Graham that the court-house was built in White Plains, and the courts removed thither from West- chester. He gave to the county the land upon which the court-house was erected, by deed to John Thomas, of Harrison, then a member of the Colonial Assembly, through whose assistance in that body the change from Westchester was effected. White Plains then soon became a business centre. Two hotels for the accommodation of guests and travelers were opened, and the first country store was built and stocked by Doctor Graham. This store stood opposite the court- house, and here the people, for more than half a cen- tury, gathered to discuss politics and to sell their sur- plus produce. The old French War, which terminated in 1760, had drawn heavily on the town of Rye, both for men and money. A list of twenty-four names is given by Dr. Baird in his " History of the Town of Rye" (p. 213), many of them members of families then living in White Plains, and most of them young men under thirty years of age: as for example, Ezekiel Brun- dage, aged twenty-seven ; Joseph ]\Ierritt, twenty- four; Abraham Lyon, twenty-two; Joseph Merritt, twenty-three ; Ezekiel IMerritt, twenty-three ; Samuel Lane, twenty-two; John Lounsbury, twenty; Val. Lounsbury, twenty-one; John Budd, twenty-seven; Abraham Haight, seventeen ; Reuben Lane, sixteen ; Nathaniel Haight, seventeen ; Caleb Sherwood, nine- teen ; Josepii Haight, twenty ; Elisha ]\Ierritt, eigh- teen ; Peter Merritt, nineteen. For many years the stories of that French and Indian War furnished en- tertainment for many households, as they spent the long winter evenings gathered about the great open fire-places. This war brought with it a heavy debt, the payment of which, while it severely taxed the resources of the people, proved valuable as teaching them how great was their strength in emergencies, a knowledge that was of inestimable benefit to them in the conflict with the mother country that soon followed. The mother country, also seeing, from the payment of this debt, that the colonists were capable of meeting such heavy liabilities, was leil to impose the burdens from which her colonies revolted. We now approach the time of that conflict of prin- ciples which preceded and produced the Revolution. In twelve of the thirteen colonies it was a contest for the maintenance of chartered rights and privileges; the other colony, New York, was a conquered province, over which the Ki ng might exercise such authority as he thought fit, and the conflict in that colony was for the rights of its people as Englishmen. And it seems to be a well-established fact that New York was the first of the colonies to point to freedom and independence in tones distinct and clear. The uprising in 1764 — call it mob, if you will — against the impressing of four fishermen, and the gathering of the people as one man on the 1st day of November, 1765, in opposition to the stamps, which are often spoken of as the first steps toward revolution, were long antedated by a religious controversy which was certainly not without its influence in preparing the people for the great events soon to follow. Lead- ing Presbyterians had formed an association bearing the name of the " Whig Club," in organized opposi- tion to the Church of England and the English gov- ernment. In the year 1719 Thomas Smith, with three other Scotch-Irish Presbyterians, purchased a piece of land on Wall Street, upon which to erect a church edifice. They subsequently applied for a charter of incorpora- tion, to secure to them their estate for religious wor- ship, but were defeated by the violent opposition of the Church of England. After years of unsuccessful solicitation, the land was finally conveyed to the moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, up6n which the Church of Scotland de- 726 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. clarecl that the property was held for the purposes for which it was originally purchased and designed. The opposition of the Church of England, instead of crushing out the Presbyterians, stimulated them to increased efforts, and developed a force that eventu- ally drove English sway from the country. Much that is entertaining and instructive in regard to these men and their followers may be found in the " The Sons of Liberty in New York," by Henry B. Dawson, Esq., a book that should be in every district school library, instead of being a rare volume found only in our best libraries. These Presbyterian Sons of Liberty were William Smith, Sr., William Smith, Jr., William Livingston, John Morin Scott and others. Of this con- flict there was an interested witness in White Plains, for the Rev. John Smith, of that town, was a brother to the one and an uncle to the other of the Smiths. It is of these Presbyterians that a learned historian has said : " The first voice publicly raised in America to dissolve all connection with Great Britain came, not from the Puritans of New England, or the Dutch of New York, or the planters of Virginia, but from the JScotch-Irish Presbyterians." ' The central location of White Plains, with its court- house, made it a convenient place for public assem- blages of the peo|)le ; and the Revolutionary events connected with this town will ever retain a promi- nent place in American history. The conflict seemed rapidly approaching in 1774, and soon entered into and divided the family circle. A marked instance ot this is found in the family of Jonathan P. Horton, who was himself a determined Loyalist, while some of his sons were among the most active Whigs who fought in the vicinity of the " Neutral Ground." - In striking contrast to this is the following notice, taken from Bivim/ion's Gazette of April 20, 177-"), of a mar- riage in a more united family : " March 28. This evening wiis married, at the White Plains, West- chester County, Mr. Gabriel Purdy, youngest son of Mr. Samuel Purdy, to the agreeable Miss Charity Purdy, daughter of Mr. Joseph Purdy, both of that loyal town. What particularly is remarkable in the affair is this, the guests consisted of tbrty-seveu per- sons, thirty-seven of whom were Purdys, and not a single Whig among them." This day (March 28, 1775) was a memorable one in the history not only of White Plains, but of West- chester County. Public notice had been given of a meeting of persons from different districts of the county to consider the most proper method of taking the sense of the freeholders of the county upon the expediency of choosing deputies to meet the depu- ties from other counties for the purpose of electing delegates to represent this colony in the General C'lnjrress to be held in Philadelphia on the 10th day of May then next. At this meeting it was recom- 1 5 Bancroft, "7. - Sabiue's " Loyalists," ii. page 53*. mended that a convention be held at White Plains oo the 11th day of April then next, at ten o'clock in the forenoon, at the court-house. On the day appointed, a numerous body of freeholders of the county assem- bled at the court-house, chose Lewis Morris for their chairman, and appointed eight persons, or a majority of them, to act as the deputies of this county for the purpose aforesaid. A few days after this meeting, a protest, bearing date the 13th of April, 1775, signed with over thi'ee hundred names, appeared in Eivingion's Xerv York Gazette, in which it was stated that on the 11th of April the friends of government met at the house of Captain Hatfield, and at about twelve o'clock walked to the court-house, where they found the other com- pany collected in a body ; that the friends of the gov- ernment then declared that they had been called to- gether for an unlawful purpose, and they would not contest the matter with the others by a poll, but that they came only with a design to protest against all such disorderly proceedings, and to show their detes- tation of all unlawful Committees and Congresses ; that then, giving three huzzas, they returned to Captain Hatfield's, singing as they went, " God save great George, our King ;" after which, the following protest was drawn up and signed : " We, the subsciibers, freeholders and inhabitants of the County of Westchester, having assembled at White Plains in conseqoence of certain advertisements, do now declare onr honest abborence of all unlawful Congresses and Committees, and that we are detennined, at the hazard of otir lives and properties, to support the King and constitution, and that we acknowletlge no representatives but the General Assembly, to whose wisdom we submit the guardianship of our rights and priv i leges." The following names appended to this declaration show that the Tory faction of White Plains was well represented : " J. P. Horton, Daniel Oakley, William Davis, Wm. Anderson, Captain Abraham Hatfield, Gilbert Horton, Joshua Gedney, John Hyatt, Nehe- miali Tompkins, Bartholomew Gedney, Isaac Purdy, Elijah Purdy, Gilbert Hatfield, Gabriel Purdy, Thos. Merritt, John Gedney, Monmouth Hart, Timothy Purdy, Thomas Barker, Elijah Miller, William Bar- ker, Jr., Samuel Purdy, James Knifiin, Joseph Hart," etc. On the 8th day of May, 1775, a meeting of the freeholders of Westchester County was held in White Plains, and Gouverneur Morris, Lewis Graham, James Van Cortlandt, Stephen Ward, Robert Graham, Daniel Dayton, John Holmes, Jr., and Wm. Pauld- ing were chosen delegates from this county to the Provincial Convention of the Province of New York. Enlistments for the army immediately commenced, and Ambrose Horton reported fifty -six able-bodied men, July 26, 1775. The commissions for the officers, — Isaac Hatfield, captain ; James Varian, first lieu- tenant ; Anthony Miller, second lieutenant ; and John Falconer, ensign — were issued September 13, 1775. WHITE PLAINS. 72T On the 14th of February 1776, niinute-meu to the number of nineteen, among whom were Benjamin Lyon, Stephen Sheley, Micah Townsend, James Varian, Samuel Crawford, Isaac Oakley, James Brun- dage and Robert Graham, met at White Phiins for the purpose of electing officers, and made choice of James Varian for captain, Samuel Crawford for fii-st lieutenant and Isaac Oakley for second lieutenant. The Provincial Congress of this State, which had been in session in New York, adjourned on the 3Uth of June, 1776, to the court-house in White Plains ; and on the 9th of July, while assembled here, the Declaration of Independence was received and read in front of the court-house by John Thomas, Esq. The battle of White Plains occurred on the 28th of October following. The details of that battle, and of the subsequent burning of the Court-house and the principal dwellings in the village, form part of a chapter which ap- pears elsewhere in this work, written by a masterly hand, and will not be attempted here. General Howe's retreat from White Plains was mysterious and unaccountable; command- ing a magnificent army of veterans, splendidly equipped and Hushed with success, why should he retreat? The question was discussed by Washington and his council of officers without arriving at any satisfactory answer. AVhen Howe returned to England his con- duct here was investigated by a committee of Parliament, but he refused to explain I'urther than to say that he "had political reasons." The question remained unanswered until tlfe publication, in 1879, by that laborious his- torian, Edward F. de Lancey, of " The History of New York during the Revolutionary War, by Thomas Jones," in which it appears that one William Demont, the adjutant of Colonel Magaw, the commander of Fort Washington, on New York Island, on the 2d day of Novem- ber, 1776, passed undiscovered out of the fort and into the camp of Lord Percy, at Harlem, carry- ing with him plans of Fort Washington and full information as to the garrison, and placed them in the hands of the British officer. Percy, of course, sent the information to Lord Howe at White Plains ; the latter suddenly changed his plan of attacking Washington, and on the 4th of November prepared to march to Fort Washington, which he captured on the 16th of that month. Within five months after the formal declaration of our independence the last vestige of the American army had been driven from the island of New York, and that place remained in possession of the British until the close of the war. During the war the Brit- ish lines extended a few miles into Westchester County. The lines of the American army first stretched across the county at White Plains, and gradually receded to the Croton River. That portion of the county between the two armies was then, and ever, since has been, known as the " Neutral Ground." This portion of Westchester County was the battle- ground of the disaffected, the prey of both friend and foe; scenes of cruelty and bloodshed unknown in civilized warfare marked these partisan engage- ments, and in defense of their homes, some of her valiant sons exhibited instances of personal bravery MAP OF WHITE PLAINS IX 1776.' EXPLANATION. aa-Stage roail from Bennington ee-Road to Dobbs Ferry across the to Xew York. bb-Road to Rye town. cc-Road to town of Mamaroneck. dd-Road to landing called Rye Xeck. North river. ff-Called the White Plains street. gg-Road to town of Harrison. hh-Road to town of Greenburgh. iThe following indorsement is on the original of this map at Albany. 728 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. ii kk-Roade for private uses. 4. Cassaway Brook. 1. Meeting-house of Methodist So- 5. Golden Pine Brook. ciety. 6. American Encampment in 1776. 2. Court-house. 7. Britisli Encampment in 1776. .3. Property of Presbyterian So- ciety. unsurpassed in ancient or modern times. Others, at- tacliing themselves to the Britisli side, were known as " Cowboys," and were engaged in plundering the people between the lines, of their cattle and other property. Others again, were known as " Skinners," and professing allegiance to the American side, lived chiefly within the patriot lines. Both of them, Cow- boys and Skinners, were treacherous, rapacious and cruel. No region in the United States was so har- assed and trampled down as this debatable ground. Hostile armies marched and countermarched over it, and its ruined condition eloquently portrayed the horrid desolation of war. In almost every family of THE MILLER HOUSE. Wasliington's Headquarters, White Plains. the old residents there linger traditions that vividly illustrate the perils, torture and trials of that gloomy period. The distress and suffering of the i)eople, however, was not all inflicted by the " Cowboys" and "Skin- ners ; " the soldiers of the regular army were also guilty of plundering the inhabitants in the neighbor- hood of the camp. AVhen Colonel Aaron Burr as- sumed command of the forces at White Plains, in the autumn of 1778, he established strict discipline with- in and security without the camp. Soon after his ar- rival, some soldiers had made their tent more com- fortable by beds and bedding taken from the house of N. Y. : " The northern part composed of rocks, stones, hills and valleys ; the southern part the hills are less frequent but more tlat and extensive ; the surface much broken, with large bodies of solid rock rising a little above the earth and running nearly parallel to it ; the side of which is cold, wet and heavy ; the whole much worn and e.\hau*ted, and over- run with two species of pernicious and prolific weeds, very unfavorable to the interests of the proprietoi-s. " Isaac Gedney, a Tory ; the circumstance being brought to the notice of Burr, he commanded them to return every article to its owner. During the summer of 1781 the French army en- camped in Greenburgh and White Plains; the left wing, composed of Lauzun's Legion, covered Chat- terton's Hill and the White Plains. The head- quarters of Lauzun, the commanding oflScer, were in the Falconer house, which stood on the corner of Broadway and Lake Street, in front of Mr. Slosson's residence ; the house is now standing next south of Mr. Hand's beautiful home. Lauzun was celebrated for the elegance of his person and manners ; he was a general favorite and one of the bravest of men. Like many other officers in the allied army, he af- terwards became engaged in the French Revolution, and perished under the guillotine. At the close of the war business of all kinds, which had been long abandoned, was resumed ; a new court-house was built, and White Plains, by an act of the Legislature, became an independent town. With but few exceptions, new men became leaders in town af- fairs. In 1788 John Barker pur- chased the Owen farm, which extended on the west side of Broadway from the Presbyter- ian Church to Railroad Ave- nue, and in 1796-97 he repre- sented the county in the As- sembly. In 1799 Dr. Archi- bald McDonald moved into the town, having purchased the property on the corner of Broad- way and Spring Street ; and for many years thereafter the sons of John Barker and of Archi- bald McDonald were active in town and county politics. Richard Hatfield, a native of the town, was for many years the foremost man in every enterprise, whether it was organizing and incorporating a church or presiding at a town-meeting. About 1795 Edward Thomas, a lawyer, located in town, on the Squire place ; he was appointed surro- gate, but died in 1806. In that year Minott Mit- chell, a young lawyer from Connecticut, settled in White Plains, and for half a century was active in every project to benefit the town and county. For a quarter of a century he was town clerk, and during that time the town was at no expense for his official or legal services. For more than twenty years after the war the vil- lage hotel was opposite the court-house, and was kept by Dr. Graham ; he also had a store a rod or two south of the hotel. Both hotel and store passed into the possession of Stephen Barker, who continued them WHITE PLAINS. 729 until 1812. In that year he conveyed them to Hyatt Lyon, who retained them but two or three years, when he sold them to Richard Willis. There were then other hotels, — one kept by William Baldwin, in the house now occupied by Mr. Samuel C. Miller ; an- other kept by Isaac Valentine, on the grounds of the present house of Captain Lyon; and the fourth a few- rods west from the southeast corner of the Waller place, kept before the Revolution by Abraham Hat- field, and during the war, and for years afterwards, by his son, Joseph Hatfield, and snbsequently, down to 1830, by Alexander Fowler. Prior to 1825 most of the traveling was done by private conveyance, and taverns were more necessary then than now. The farmers' light produce was carried to New York weekly by two market-wagons, while the heavy was carried to the rivers and sent by sloops. In 1828 a number of gentle- men in White Plains, desi- rous that there should be a school in which their sons might be educated and fitted for college, applied to the Legislature and procured the charter for an academy, which was for many years successfully conducted. Fifty years ago there were no roads running westerly from Broadway, between the old post road running past the residence of Mr. Samuel Faile and the road to Tarry- town, north of the Presby- terian Church. The business part of the town was on the west side of Broadway, north of the old court-house and south of Railroad Avenue. Opposite the court-house was the principal hotel, at which the daily mail stages met at noon, carrying mails and passengers between New York and Danbury. A little north of the court-house was the law-office of Minott Mitchell, and a few rods northwest from his oflice was his residence, erected in 1829-30. On the lot on which Mr. Elijah S. Tompkins now resides was the shop and the dwelling-house of Elisha Crawford, saddler and harness-maker, while next-door the dwelling now occu- pied by Samuel C.Miller was then the hotel of Robert Palmer, and about fifty feet north was the store of Palmer & Fisher. Between the hotel and the store was a building, a part of which was occupied by Purdy Tompkins, the village tailor, the other part being the law-office of Robert S. Hart, Esq., a young gentleman then lately admitted to the bar. He soon after removed to Bedford, where his clients chiefly resided. He was appointed first judge of the Court of Common Pleas in 184G, and was also appointed a master in Chancery. In a long one-story building, adjoining the store of Palmer & Fisher, were the shoe-shop of Israel Purdy, the post-office, the publishing office of the Wesic/iesfer Sj)>/ and the drug-store of Samuel G. Arnold. The next building was the law-office of Joseph Warren Tompkins, Esq., one of the leading lawyers of the county and a skillful advocate. Adjoining was the lot and house of William Horton, the same now owned by Mr. Merwin Sniffin;on the next lot north was the store and residence of Elisha Horton, afterwards WESTCHESTER COUNTY COUKT-HOI SE, WHITE PLAINS, 1886. county treasurer of the county, and the next building on the north was the residence of Schuyler C. Tomp- kins, the same in appearance now as then. On the corner of the lot, with its front on Broadway, was the hat-store and factory of Schuyler C. Tompkins, the village hatter, and a few feet farther on was the store of Purdy Si Fisher (Charles A. Purdy and Nathaniel Fisher). From this store the Red Bird stage started early every morning, excepting Sunday, for New York City. On the adjoining lot the village undertaker, David Miller, with a kind and sympa- { thetic nature, conducted his business, j At this time there were two physicians in the town, I Dr. David Palmer and Dr. Livingston Roe. The ' former resided on the Squire place and the latter on 730 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the place now occupied by the Misses Miller, in the southern part of Broadway. South of the court-house was the county clerk's office, and in the house now occupied by Mrs. Prime was the hotel of Benjamin Briggs. Subsequently two streets were opened, one called the New Post Road, the other Railroad Avenue. The extension of the Harlem Railroad to White Plains, in 1846, attracted the business to Railroad Avenue, which is now lined with stores, otlices and public buildings, presenting daily a scene of bustle, activity and hurry. Places of business thus ceased to exist on Broadway, which is now bordered on each side with fine dwellings, making it, with its great width, the finest avenue in the State. Town Officers.— The White Plains Precinct, as it was called until 1788, held meetings of the freeholders on the first Tuesday of April in each year, for the election of a clerk, supervisor and other officers for the man- agement of the public affiiirs, independent of the town of Rye, of which, however, it continued to be a part. The most important oflScer was the clerk, who was selected on account of his superior educa- tion. The next officer in importance was the super- visor. In the early history of White Plains changes in these officers were rarely made; the principle of rotation in office had no advocates there. The first election was held in April 1727. Caleb Hyatt, Jr., was chosen clerk, and continued to be re- elected annually until 1776, when Miles Oakley was chosen. From 1776 to 1783 there were no elections. The following persons then were successively elected and served as clerks: Daniel Hoi toii 1783 to 1787 Joseph Prior 1787 to 17S8 William Barker, Jr 178S to 1800 Stephen Barker 1800 to 18(H Davifl Falconer 1804 to 1806 Stephen Barker 1806 to 1810 Joseph lIortoM ISIO to 1812 Bliuott Mitchell 1812 to 1838 Joseph S. Jlitchell 1838 to 1842 John W. Mills 1842 to 1844 Schiiyler C. Tompkins 1S44 to 1849 Enoch Dick and Elias P. Piudy 1849 to 1S50 The following served as supervisors : Caleb Hyatt 1727 to 173.i Moses Owen 1733 to 173fi Jonathan Purdy 173G to 1750 Elisha Budd 1750 to 1753 Elisha Hyatt 1753 to 1755 Elisha Bnild 1755 to 1758 Abraham Hatfield 1758 to 1769 Dr. Robert Graham 1769 to 1775 Samuel Purdy 1775 to 1776 In 1776 Anthony Miller was elected, and thereafter there were no elections until 1783. From that time down to 1850 the supervisors were, — Daniel Horton 1783 to 1787 Richard Hatfield 1787 to 1790 John Falconer 1796 to 1801 Jacob Purdy 1801 to ISIO Jonathan I'lirdy 1810 to 1816 Joseph Horton 1816 to 1818 John Falconer 1818 to 1831 Elisha Horton 1831 to 1838 Henry Willets 1S3S to 1844 John W. Mills 1844 to 1846 Lewis C. Piatt 1846 to 1847 John M'. Mills 1847 to 1848 John Dick 1848 to 1849 Henry C. Field 1849 to 1850 From 1850 to the present time the following super- visors and town clerks have been elected : VIEW OF WHITE PLAINS IX 1S.3.J. 1 SIPERVISOKS. TOWN OLEEKS. 1850. John Dick. Elias P. Purdy. 1851. Gilbert S. Lyon. Carlton Palmer. 1852. Gilbert S. Lyon. Elijah Guiou. 1853. Gilbert S. Lyon. John Banta. 1854. Robert Cochran. Wm. H. Huestis. 1855-56. John J. Clapp. Wm. H. Huestis. 1857-59. Gilbert S. Lyon. Win. H. Huestis. 1860-61. John W. Jlills. Wm. H. Huestis. 1862-66. E. G. Sutherland. Wm. H. Huestis. 1867. John D. Gray. Caleb Morgan, Jr. 1868. John D. Gray. A. J. Hyatt. 1869-70. Slichael Donohue, Jr. ,\. J. Hyatt. 1871-72. E. G. Sutherland. D. B. Stevens. 1873. E. G. Sutherland, Wm. H. Cutter. 1874. Elisha Horton. Wm. H. Cutter. 1875. Robert Cochran. E. Ba.\ter and .\. J. Hyatt 1876. Elisha Horton. J. E. Cnderhill. 1877. Stephen S. Marshall. A. J. Hyatt. 1878. E. G. Sutherland. A. J. Hyatt. 1879-81. Artemus Eggleston. Henry .V. JIaynard. 1882. Elisha Horton. Henry .\. Maynard. 1883-84. Lew is C. Piatt. W. .\. Maynard. 1885. Lewis C. Piatt. Chas. P. Paulding. 1886. Lewis C. Piatt. Francis H. Hessels. Village of White Plains. — By an act of the Legislature of the State, passed April 3, 1866, and amended by an act passed April 22, 1867, that part of White Plains particularly bounded and described in Section 1 of said act was declared to be the " Village of White Plains," and the inhabitants resident within the boundaries were declared to be a body corporate, to be known by the corporate name of " The Village of White Plains."' Originally there were seven trustees, two of whom were elected each year for a term of three years ; they chose the president from amongst their own number. In 1878 the charter was amended, dividing the village into three wards and providing for election of one trus- WHITE tee annually from each ward for a term of two years; and the board of trustees elected a president from outside their own body, who had no vote except in case of a tie. At the first election of officers, in 1866, the follow- ing persons were chosen : President, John Swinburne ; Clerk, .loliii JI. Kowell ; Trustees, Gilbert S. Lyon and Edward Sleatli for one year ; H. I' Rowell anil .1 . 1'. Jenkins, two years ; J. W. Mills, John Swinburne and Harvey Groot, three yeai-s. ISr.T. — President, John Swinburne ; Tlerk, John M. Kowell ; Trustees, Hinini I'. Rowell, JoliTi P. Jenkins, John W. Jlills, Jcjhn Swinburne, Harvey Groot, Gilbert S. Lyon and John I). Gray. (As the records previotisto 1871 are lost, a coini)!ete list of officers cannot be not filled. s James D. Wright resigned July 19, 1882, and was succeeded by Samuel Hopper. 5 Henry P. Stewart was elected to the unexpired term of Samuel Hopper, but failed to'iualify, and I. V. Fowler was elected in bis place. 732 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. was formally laid out in 1717. It followed the old Indian Path, which led from the native settlement on the hill on the Fisher farm, south of the Fisher homestead, corner of Lexington Avenue and the post road, by a winding course over the hill, as it now runs, past Mr. Faile's and around the Waller corner to its junction with Broadway, opposite the Mitchell homestead. On the east side of the road, opposite the Waller corner, was the Indian burying-ground. The road to the Hudson River from White Plains was laid out in 1730, along the north side of the Presbyterian Church. In 1764 the terminus of this road on Broadway was changed to its present loca- tion of Spring Street. The road now called Lake Street was laid out in 1762. The road to Mamaroneck was laid out the 11th of November, 1725, and commenced at the old post road. At that time James Travis owned the Sam- uel Faile place, and Moses Knapp owned what is now the beautiful property of j\Irs. E. L. Carhart. The highway leading from Broadway and passing the residence of Mrs. Ellen T. Donahue was laid out the 24th of April, 1735. The road beginning at Broadway nearly opposite the road last mentioned, and now running south of the cemetery, was laid out May 22, 1740. These are all the principal roads that were in ex- istence prior to 1830 in what is now the village of White Plains. White Plains was at the time of its purchase the planting-ground of the natives, and derived its name from the white balsam, a plant then covering its surface, which, although not level, presented the ap- pearance of a plain when seen from the surround- ing hills. churches. Church of England and Protestant Epis- copal Church in White Plains. — The history of the Protestant Episcopal Church in White Plains has been carefully written by Robert Bolton, in his "His- tory of the Church in Westchester County," and much that follows is derived from his very interesting work. From the time of the conquest of New Netharland by the English (in 1664) down to the arrival of Gov- ernor Fletcher (in 1692) the inhabitants of the town of Rye (which then, and until 1784, included the White Plains) were Presbyterians or Dissenters, and there existed " no trace of the Church of England in the Colony." Through the efforts of Governor Fletcher, the Col- onial Assembly, which was composed almost entirely of Dissenters, was induced to j)ass a bill " For the maintenance of a Ministry." A similar law existed in Connecticut, under whose ecclesiastical jurisdic- tion Rye was at this time. After the passage of this bill the Governor declared that there was no ministry but of the Church of England ; and through his power, with the aid of the '' Society for Propagating the Gospel in Foreign Parts," a minister of the Church of England was inducted into the church at Rye in the year 1704, but Episcopal services were not intro- duced into White Plains until 1724, when the Rev. Mr, Jenny preached there three or four times a year ; and such services were held down to the time of the Revolution, which utterly ruined the mission. During the war the clergy were placed in an em- barrassing position. Not to pray for the King, ac- cording to the litany, was to act against the dictates of their consciences, while to have used the prayers would have been to draw upon themselves persecution and destruction. The only course left them was to suspend the exercise of their functions and shut up their churches. After the war the church became an independent branch of the Church of Christ, and having organized an ecclesiastical union, free from alliances with human sovereigns, demonstrated its congeniality with our free institutions. In 1787 White Plains and Rye united in erecting a church edifice at the latter place, of which the Rev. Richard C. Moore was chosen rector, September 5, 1787. Pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of New York relating to the incorporation of religious societies, a meeting of the congregation of Rye Church was held and a certificate of incorpor- ation made, dated the 21st day of February, 1795, in which " the rector and two of the congregation of the Protestant Episcopal Church of the towns of Rye and White Plains, in the County of Westchester, certify that Peter Jay and John Barker were elected church wardens, and Joshua Purdy, Jr.," and seven others were elected vestrymen ; and that " the style and title shall be ' Christ's Church in the town of Rye, in the County of Westchester and State of New York.' " An act of the Legislature having been subsequent- ly passed " for the relief of the Protestant Episcopal Church of the State of New York," the church de- termined to re-incorporate under that act, and a meet- ing for the purpose was duly called and held, and a certificate of incorporation, dated June 7, 1796, was made and filed, by which it appears that the officers of the Rye and White Plains Episcopal Church, chosen under this incorporation, were Peter Jay and Isaac Purdy, church wardens ; and Joshua Purdy and seven others, vestrymen — the same corporate name being retained. Under this organization the church of Rye and White Plains continued services in each town — two-thirds in Rye and one-third in White Plains — until 1816, when the wardens and vestrymen resolved to discontinue services at White Plains ; and accordingly such services were discon- tinued, although White Plains had contributed to the erection and support of the church. From 1816 to 1823 only occasional services were held at White Plains by the neighboring clergy, and when, in 1824, it was proposed to organize a church, there was not one male communicant in the place, and only four or five females were church members. WHITE PLAINS. 733 Notwithstandiug such discouraging circumstances, it was deterniinefl to organize a church, and accord- ingly, upon the 22d of March, 1824, a church was in- corporated under the title of " Grace Protestant Episcopal Church, White Plains," with Richard Jarvis and Alan McDonald as church wardens ; Wil- liam Purdy, John Horton, Gilbert Hatfield, James Dick, Alexander Fowler, Joshua Horton, William Bulkley and James D. Merritt, vestrymen ; and the same year the Rev. William C. Mead was elected rec- tor, and proceedings were instituted for the erection of a church edifice. Mr. Mead was very acceptable to all, both in and out of his church, and his efforts to build a house for worship were generously aided by the people, without regard to creed or sect. How well this kind assist- ance was appreciated the records of the vestry show by an entry in the minutes, June 25, 1826, after the church was comjiletcd, of a vote of thanks to the otticers and members of the Presbyterian Society in White Plains, for the use of their church. Mr. Mead removed in 1826, and was succeeded by the Rev. Alexander H. Crosby, a laborious student and earnest preacher. He remained but two years, and was followed by the Rev. John W. Curtis, who continued here for two years. Mr. Curtis was a Christian gentleman, of fine personal appearance and of a cheerful and social nature, which endeared him to all within his influence. His health failing, in 1831 he applied to the bishop for a change, and be- came the editor of the Churchman, then first es- tablished. The change from the country to the city, however, operated for the worse ; he declined rapidly in health, and died in 1835. The Rev. Robert W. Harris took charge of the parish in 1831, and for nearly a quarter of a centurj' faithfully served his Master and his flock. About him there was no sectarian bigotry ; deeply taught by the Spirit, he belonged less to any human school of divinity than to the one great body of Christ's true disciples. He was an Episcopalian by birth, education and preference, but in his highest aspira- tions a member of the general assembly and church of the first born. He wtis ever bold in opposing error, and ever zealous in defending truth. In preach- ing he was earnest and impressive rather than elo- quent. He loved the church and its order, and did not undervalue its external and formal arrangements. His Catholicism was broad enough to cover all who rested their hopes for salvation on the same Jesus whom he served, whether in or out of his church. Few are now living who can remember the time when he first appeared here in the fresh glow of youth ; and of the wardens and vestrymen who then directed the affairs of the church not one remains. In the year 1855, Dr. Harris resigned so far as to have an associate rector appointed. Under this ar- rangement the Rev. Theodore Rumney was elected associate rector, and commenced preaching on the first Sunday of October^ 18n5. Soon afterward Dr. Harris resigned the whole charge of the parish, and for nearly fifteen years Mr. Rumney faithfully, labo- iously and warm-heartedly devoted himself to his church and people. In 1870, having received a call from Christ's Church, Germantown, Pa., he resigned, and the present rector, that genial Christian gentleman, the Rev. Frederick B. Van Kleeck, began his labors here, and for sixteen years has gone about doing good; and everywhere, whether in the pulpit, the social circle or beside the sick-bed, his presence is mosi acceptable. Presbyterian Church.— Prior to 1727 the people of White Plains were members of, and attended, the Dissenting or Presbyterian Church of Rye. In that year a church edifice was erected in White Plains, chiefly through the efforts of the Rev. John Walton, a native of New London, and a graduate of Yale College, who came to Rye in 1723,' and to White Plains in 1726. Mr. Walton was highly gifted as a preacher, and although self-willed and erratic, did much tostrengthen the Presbyterians, and induced many, who had been drawn over to the Church of England, to return. His eloquence and persistent efforts as a preacher provoked the hostile criticism of the Rev. Mr. Wetmore, the English minister at Rye, who, in his letter to the secretary of the Propagation Society,^ calls him "a bold, noisy fellow, with a voluble tongue, drawing the greatest part of the town after him." A church was erected in 1727 on land given by Mr. Walton, on the spot where the present church stands. In 1728 Mr. Walton was succeeded by the Rev. Ed- mund Ward, also a graduate of Yale College, and a native of Killingworth, Connecticut. Mr. Ward remained but two years, when he removed to Guilford, Connecticut, and the pulpit was vacant for several years after his departure, during which time occasional preaching was had by ministers from Connecticut. On the 30th of December, 1742, a council of the Eastern Consociation of Fairfield County met at Rye and ordained the Rev. John Smith as minister. We are under great obligations to Dr. Baird for procuring^ and giving us a particular account of that occasion, and of the life and services of this eminent man. Mr. Smith, like his predecessors, was a graduate of Yale College. His father, Mr. Thomas Smith, was one of the little band of Christians who organized the first Presbyterian Church in New York City. His ' brother, William Smith, and his nephew, William 1 Smith, Jr., were leaders among the Sons of Liberty in New York City, and organizers of the "Whig Club," from which came the first utterances in favor of liberty, i Previous to his coming to Rye, Mr. Smith had mar- ried a daughter of ^Ir. James Hooker, a grandson of the famous Thomas Hooker, the founder of » Dr. Bair.rs "Rye," 32-2. 2 Bollon's " ChurcIi|History," 246. 734 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the colony of Connecticut. After a few years' resi- dence in Rye, Mr. Smith removed to White Plains. The house in which he lived and died is still standing. Owing to the feeble health and declining strength of Mr. Smith, the Presbytery, on the 11th of October, 1769, ordained Mr. Ichabod Lewis, also a graduate of Yale, as pastor. It is supposed that Mr. Smith con- tinued to preach until a short time before his death, which took place on the 26th of February, 1771. His j remains lie under the pulpit of the present church. Soon after the battle of White Plains, and on the night of the 5th of November, 1776, the church was bui-ned, and the congregation, owing to the troubles of the times, was scattered ; many of them, being stanch Whigs, removed from this disi)Uted territory, in order to escape the depredations of Tories and the British troops. The Rev. Mr. Lewis removed to Bedford. In 1784 an act of the Legislature enabled religious societies or congregations to become corporate bodies, in pursuance of which this church, on the 12th of De- cember, 1787, became incorporated under the name of " The Trustees of the Presbyterian Church in the White Plains in Westchester County ;" from 1784 to 1821 the congregation enjoyed only irregular preaching, the ser- vices being held in the court-house, which stood in front of the present residence of Jlr. Fiero. From 1821 to 1823 the Rev. Thomas G. Smith offi- ciated as stated supply. He was succeeded by the Rev. ^larcus Harrison, who soon resigned, and the Rev. Mr. Ely supplied the pulpit until October, 1823, when the Rev. Samuel Robinson was installed as pastor. A new church was erected in 1824 on the foundation of the old one. From 1825 to 1834 the Rev. Chester Long was the acceptable pastor, and on his resignation the Rev. John White wa.s called, but remained only one year, when be resigned. In 1835 the Rev. Edward Wright was installed, and continued for nine years to fill the pulpit acceptably, till failing health compelled him to resign, and in July, 1844, the Rev. Eliits S. Schenk was installed and supplied the pulpit for five years. From January to July, 1850, the Rev. Bronson B. Beardsley officiated as stated supply ; and from July, 1850, to July, 1853, the Rev. Joseph Forsyth was pastor. He was succeeded in 1853 by the Rev. David Peese, who served as stated supply for sixteen years. In June, 1871, the Rev. T. 0. Steele was called as pastor, and continued until ill health compelled him to resign, in November, 1873. On July 19, 1874, the congregation called the Rev. E. L Heermance, who has since faithfully discharged his duties, never having failed to be at his post either in person or by proper representative. Bv an act of the Legislature passed May 5, 1863, the name and title was changed from "The Trustees of the Presbyterian Church in the Town of White Plains, Westchester County," to "The White Plains Presby- terian Church." The Methodi.st Church. — There is no record evidence of an organized Methodist society or church in White Plains until alter the Revolutionary War, but there is unquestionable proof that there was a Methodist society in White Plains as early as 1741. At this time the people, who were Dissenters, had no regular minister of their own persuasion, and no means wherewith to provide a support for one, being compelled by taxation to sustain the Church of Eng- land, which they regarded as little better than the Church of Rome, and the pulpit of the White Plains Church was vacant. In the fall of the year 1740 George Whitefield visited and preached in Rye, and altiiough he only passed through the town without stopping a night, the good seed sown by him on that October day brought forth an hundred-fold. At this time John Wesley was organizing his followers in England in classes, appointing over each a leader who was to look after their spiritual inter- ests ; and a Methodist society, as it existed in England in 1740, was composed of Gospel Christians in a town or village drawn toward each other by their common trust in Jesus the Christ, formed into a class, with a leader, and governed by the rules laid down by Wes- ley for their guidance. The people having no acceptable minister, neglected religious worship, and a general decline and deadness in matters of religion followed. While in this sad condition the new Methodism in England, with its simple, social and informal worship, which was exactly suited to the condition of the people, naturally attracted their attention and enlisted their feelings. At this time the Rev. James Wetmore, a minister of the Church of England, sent by the Propagation Society, placed over this people by the power of the Governor, and supported by oppressive taxa- tion, was the minister of Rye and the White Plains — the White Plains being then, and until 1783, within the town bounds 6f Rye. Mr. Wetmore was required to report to the society several times a year the condition of his parish, and it is from his communications, which follow, that the existence of an organized Methodist society in this town as early as 1741-43 is established. Under date of September 28, 1741, not quite a year after the Whitefield visit, the Rev. Mr. Wetmore, in a letter to the secretary of the Propagation Society, says : " The etlorts of the sectaries in this parish have been various the past year, and their endeavors inde- fatigable to weaken and destroy the Church. How- ever, by God's help, we maintain our ground, and though some of our members are corrupted with the wild enthusiasm of the new sect, I hope the measures I use to strengthen and establish my people in the faith of Christianity according to the doctrines of the Church of England, will by God's blessing prevent this new Methodism, or, rather, down-right distrac- tion in the shape it now appears among the itinerant sectaries, from gaining much ground among us." " WOODSIDE." RESIDENCE OF JOSEPH H LEV/lij. WHITE PLAINS, N. Y. WHITE PLAINS. 735 In another letter, written eighteen months hiter, dated March 25, 1743, he complains that the jjeople " are unsettled in their principles, and go after all sorts of teachers that come in their way, and many of them are much confused by the straggling Method- ist teachers that are continually among us.'' From these letters it appears that the " new Methodism " was fast gaining ground. In Mr. Wetmore's letter in September of the same year he writes: "As to the state of my parish, nothing very remarkable has happened since my last, but I find my cares and labors much increased by having two (iirobably one at White Plains and the other at Rye) Independent Methodist teachers settled by that party in my parish, besides exhorters and itinerants that frequently call people together and instil wild and entliusiastic notions into them ; they have made much confusion in the remote parts of my parish, but chiefly among those who always were Dissenters." Only two years had elapsed since his first letter comjilaining of the corrupting influences of the new sect of Methodists, and already this " wild sect " had become organized, and had two " Independent Meth- odist teachers " settled in his jjarish. He called them " teachers ; " he would not call them " minis- ters," for he recognized no minister outside of the Church of England, and these were " settled " in his parish. Although no record has been preserved of that lit- tle society, with the name of the teacher or of the members who composed the class or congregation, or in what commodious farm-house they assembled for worship, the fact that such a teacher and .such a class or congiegation. in an organized shape, existed in White Plains in 1743 cannot be controverted ; and this was seventeen years before Philip Emlniry and Barbara Heck came to America, and twenty-three years before Philip I^mbury organized his class-meet- ing or society in his house in Barrack St., New York ■City, which the learned historian. Dr. Abel Stevens, states was the foundation of Methodism in America. During the American Revolution no regular meet- ings for public religious worship by any denomina- tion of Christians were held in White Plains, but very soon after the war, little companies were gath- ered without any formal organization, one of which met at the house of Mrs. Ann Miller, in North Cas- tle (Washington's headquarters). When the New Rochelle Circuit was organized, in 17S7, Mrs. Miller's house was one of the regular appointments on the circuit ; the Rev. Samuel Talbot, who organized the first class, consisting of six persons, was preacher. In 1792 and 1793 some six members were added to the little society, three of whom — Abraham Miller, Abra- ham Davis and John Hatfield — were men of influence in the neighborhood ; and through their etlorts the embryo church grew vigorous and strong. As a church it had no corporate existence until July 23traniler and Charles ('ar|>enter 1818 ! Samuel Bushnell and M. Richardson 1819-20 j Elijah Woolsey, William Jewett and Robert .Soney . . . . 1821 i Elijah Woolsi-y. William Jewett and Noble W.Thomas . . 1822 j Heman Bangs, Noble W. Thiinnisand Richanl Seannin . . 1823 Stephen Martindale, Heman Bangs and L. .Vndrus .... 1824 Stephen Martindale and Phineas Kicc 182.5 P. P. Sandford, Ph. Rice and J. M. Smith 1826 1 Bel. lucorp.. A, page 52, Oo clerk's office. - Ibid, p. 23. » Ibid, |>age ■>:>. « Ibid, B. p. 4,52. 736 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Peter P. Sanilford, Josiah Boweii ami J. M. Smith .... 1827 Elijah Woolsey, S. Cochran anil Josiah Bow en 1828 Samuel Cochran anil Elijah Hibliartl 1829 Elijah Hihbaril and Daniel De Vinne 1830 Ebeuozer Washburn and Daniel De Vinne 1831 In 1832, White Plains and Greenburgh were set off from the New Rochelle Circuit and constituted a separate charge, and the preachers were as follows : Robert Seney and Harvey Husted 1832 Robert Seney and John B. Merwin 1833 Peter P. Sandford and Zachariah Davenport 1834 P P. Sandford and S. C. Davis 1835 Horace Bartlett and Ezra Jagger 1836 Stephen Martindale and Daniel I. M'right 1837 Stephen Martindale and John A. Sillick 183S Valentine Buck and John A. Sillick 183!1 Valentine Buck 1S40 In 1841 White Plains became a separate charge, and the preachers were, — Valentine Buck. . . . 1814 Buel Goodsell 1842-43 Richard Wymond. . . 1814-4.5 Julius Field 1846-47 Paul R. Brown . . . 1848-49 Charles B. Sing . . . 18.5()-5l John Luckey 1852 Peter P. Sandford. William S. Stihvell , Benjamin Griffin . Henry Lounsbury . William M. Cliipp . Willinm H. Evans 1853 1854-."» 1856-57 1858-59 186()-6l 1862 In 1863 White Plains became two separate charges, — namely. White Plains and White Plains village — and the preachers were, — White Plains (Old Church). William H. Evans . Darius D. Lindsley Albert H. Wyatt . Thomas B. Smith . John E. Gorse . . . 1803 1864 1866-67 1868-70 1871-73 Asa P. Lyon 1874-75 Ezra Tinker 1876 Thomas W. Chadwick . 1877 0. V. Haviland 1878-79 Thomas Lodge .... 188ii In 1881 the Old Church disbanded and united with the Village Church. Village Chi ech. Gideon Draper .... 1863-64 , William F. Hatfield . 1873-75 William JI. Chipp . . 186.-1-66 j Phineas Hawkshurs . ]878 John P. Hermance . . 1807 James Y. Bates . . . 1877-79 John W. Beach . . . 1868-69 ' Gilbert H. Gregory . . I.x8ll-81 E. B. Othaman . . . 1870 i F. Jlason Xorth . . . 1882-83 Richard Wheatley . . 1871-72 ' De Loss Lull 1884-86 St. John's Roman Catholic Church — The first Mass said in Westchester County was said at the house of Dominick Lynch, on Throgg's Point, in the town of Westchester, where the Academy of the Sacred Heart is now located. Dominick Lynch was a prominent man during the Revolution, and after the election of Washington as first President of the United States, was one of the signers of the Catholic address to Washington, ' which received a generous reply, and was followed by a memorial to Congress representing the necessity of adopting some constitu- tional provision for the protection and maintenance of civil and religious freedom, which hadco>^tsomuch blood and treasure of all classes of citizens. It was through the influence of Washington that this mem- orial was favorably received, and it resulted in the enactment of that article in the constitution which declares that Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or the free exercise thereof, and which has since been incorporated in the fundamental law. 1 History of the Irish Settlers in North America, by T. D'.\rcy JIcGee, p. 77. Dominick Lynch, of New York, in 1795, purchased the farm of Lewis Graham, on Throgg's Point, and it was in his house on this farm that the first Mass in Westchester County was said. In 1839 Throgg's Point and Sawpits (now Port Chester) were missions attended from Harlem, the former every second Sunday in the month, the latter occasionally, by Rev. M. Curran and Rev. Bernard O. Farrell. In 1842 these missions were attended from St. John's College, Fordham. In 1843 and 1844 Rev. Father Yilanus, D.D., of St. John's College, Ford- ham, attended New Rochelle once a month; also- Sawpits, Westchester, Throgg's Point and Sing Sing. In 1845, Rev. William O'Reilly, of Westchester, had chai'ge of these missions. In 1846 and 1847, Rev. Matthew Higgins, of Westchester, attended New Rochelle and Port Chester. In 1848, Rev. Valeuive Burgos resided in Port Chester, and was succeeded towards the end of 1848 by Rev. Edward J. O'Reilly. Father O'Reilly was the first Catholic priest to con- duct services in White Plains. He began to hold meetings there about the year 1848. At this time he had charge of the Roman Catholic mission in Port Chester. In 1849 or the early part of 1850 he re- moved to New Rochelle, having been appointed pastor of St. Matthew's Church, at that place, in addition to his Port Chester charge. Father O'Reilly was a zealous worker for the ad- vancement of the Roman Catholic faith, and a man of more than ordinary ability and force of character. For several years after the beginning of his ministra- tions in White Plains, the Catholics there were with- out a house of worship of their own. Father O'Reilly, anxious to supply this need, solicited subscription& from Catholics and Protestants, and was finally able to effect his wish. A plot of ground, located where Hamilton Avenue and SpringStreet afterwards crossed each other, was purchased in the latter part of 1852,. and shortly afterward the church was erected. Father O'Reilly was succeeded by the Rev. Thonia* McLoughlin, of New Rochelle. From 1848 to 1860 White Plains was visited once a month from New Rochelle. From 1861 to 1868 it was attended by the Rev. Matthew Dowling, of Port Chester, Port Ches- ter having been made a separate mission in 1855. In 1868 Rev. John McEvoy was appointed to the charge of White Plains, and White Plains as a sepa- rate mission, with a resident pastor, dates from that time. Father McEvoy was a native of Kilkenny, Ireland, and had been an assistant in St. Stephen's Roman Catholic Church, in Twenty-eighth Street, New York City, immediately before coming to White Plains. During the first year of his ministry a larger building was erected just across Hamilton Avenue from the old structure, and the congregation moved thither, retaining the old church as a Sunday- school. Father McEvoy became chaplain of St. Vincent's Retreat, in the town of Harrison, in 1878,^ and died there some time later. WHITE PLAINS. 737 His succesilied with periodicals and a library, where young men could spend their evenings pleasantly. They secured the second and third floors of the building on the corner of Railroad Avenue and Grove Street, now oc- cupied by the Telephone Company, and the Lyceum PLAINS. 739 was opened January 20, 1872. After a few years the association removed to its jiresent comfortable (piar- ters, over Mr. Samuel Ho|)per"s store. Under the auspices of the Lyceum, a course of lec- tures and entertainments are given every winter, the last of which has usually been a dramatic perform- ance by local amateurs. The professional talent eni- l)loyc(l has been of the very best, and the anuiteur entertainments have always been welcomed with crowded audiences and have jiroduced an exalted opinion of the dramatic talent of some of the citizens. The Ionic Lodge was the first Lodge of Free and Accei)ted Masons in White Plains. It was organized under a dispensation from the Grand Lodge of the State of New York, and held its first meeting I'^ebru- ary 1, 1858. It never held but three or four meetings. John P. Jenkins was BLuster ; Elijah Guion, Senior Warden ; and Lewis C. Piatt, Junior Warden. White Plains Lodge, No. 473, received its char- ter some time later, and held its first meeting Ajjril 8, 185!). Hiram P. Rowell was its first .Master ; John F. Jenkins, Senior Warden ; John P. Jenkins, Junior Warden; John W. Mills, Treasurer; Daniel H. Lit- tle, Secretary; Francis Dauchy, Senior Deacon; William S. Cameron, Junior Deacon; and William llahlen, Tiler. The first place of meeting was in Moger's Hall, on Railroad Avenue, near Broadway. The lodge, in 1884, contained fifty members. Meet- ings arc now held in a hall, which has been fitted up at an expense of about three thousand dollars, on the northeast corner of Railroad and Lexington Avenues. The present officers are (ieorge W. Brown, Master; John Birch, Senior Warden ; William Nehr, Junior Warden; Francis H. Hessels, Secretary ; Richard Manney, Treasurer; Leonard O. Roselle, Senior Dea- con ; James H. Howes, Junior Deacon ; J. F. Loy, Senior Master of Ceremonies; Aaron Radick, Junior iMaster of Ceremonies; J. S. I'ye, Tiler; Trustees, John M. Rowell, E. B. Long and D. Morgan Under- bill. HEiiRON Lodge, No. 229, I. (). of O. F.— This lodge was chartered February 1, 1870, the charter officers being Josei)h Lye, N. G. ; James Epps, V. G. ; Frank Schermer, S. ; M. Armhruster, J. G. ; Peter Mann, T. ; H. W. Lown, R. S. N. (J.; H. Bromm, W. It has about forty-five members, and the lodge- room is on Lexington Avenue. Good Templar LoD(iE, No. 324. — This Indepen- dent Order of (iood Templars was organized Decem- ber 2(1, 1880, with sixty mend)ers. I. R. Miller was chosen W. C. T. ; G. W. Brown, W. S. ; and B. F. Hosier, L. D. The meetings of the lodge are held at the corner of Spring Street and Railroad Avenue, and there are about fifty members. The White Plains Concokdia. — This German I Musical Society was organized June 10, 1880, under 740 HISTORY OP WESTCHESTER COUNTY. the name of the " White Plains Gesang Verein," with seventeen members. Its first officers were Dr. Ludwig Dresher, president ; Adolph Matthies, vice- president ; Joseph Lye, treasurer ; Charles Burmeis- ter, recording secretary ; and Frank Gempler, ser- geant. In April, 1881, the name of the society was changed to '"' The White Plains Concordia." It num- bers about fifty-five members, who meet in a large room in the Union Hotel. James Cromwell Post, No. 466, G. A. R. — A Veteran Association was formed in White Plains in 1866, but little interest was taken in it. Subsequently stej)s were taken by some of the members to establish a Grand Army post, and on the 19th of March, 1S84, a charter was granted by J. M. Hedges, Department Commander, and on the 3d of April the post was mustered. The officers were and are Valentine M. Hodgson, Commander ; John C. Verplanck, Junior Vice Commander; Edward W. Bogart, Adjutant; Geo. W. Brown, Officer of the Day ; David P. Barnes, Ser- geant; Burlin H. Palmer, Quartermaster; Henry J. Williams, Officer of the Guard ; James S. Snedeker, CJhaplain ; Richard Roach, Inside Sentinel ; Charles B. \\'histon. Outside Sentinel. This post was organized under the name of Weitzel Post, but it soon after ai)pearing that there was an- other post bearing the same name, it was afterwards changed to its present one of James Cromwell. The Central Bank of Westchester County was incorporated on the 16th of Oct., 1828, with a capi- tal of one hundred thousand dollars. Its officers are: President, Wra. H. Albro ; Cashier, Howard E. Foster. Lafayette Hall. — In 1865 Eugene T. Preud- homme built Lafayette Hall, on Railroad Avenue, near Broadway. It will seat about four hundred and fifty persons and is used for public gatherings of var- ious descriptions. Moran's Hall was erected by James H. Moran in 1873, on the corner of Railroad Avenue and Spring Street, and will seat about four hundred persons. White Plains Gas Company. — The manufacture of gas was begun in White Plains in 1860 on a small scale, by parties from New York City. In April, 18()3, the i)ropcrty and works were ])urchased by Eu- gene T. Preudliomme, Esq., and in 1872 passed into the possession of a stock company, the capital being twenty-five thousand dollars. The officers of the company are Eugene T. Preud- liomme, president ; Charles Horton, treasurer; and William II. Huestis, secretary. /Ihe amount of gas an- nually consumed is between three and four million feet. hotels. The Orawaupum Hotel. — The first Orawaupum Hotel was built about 1844, near the New York and Harlem Railroad depot, and was kept by Mr. Isaac Smith. The name was suggested by the historian, John Macdonald, it being the name of the principal Indian chief of whom the White Plains lands were purchased. The original hotel was a frame building and was burned February 17, 1854. It was then owned by the widow of Isaac Smith, who soon thereafter erected the present edifice. It has passed through several hands and is now conducted by Stanley F. Newell, who has been pro- prietor since 1882. The hotel is built of brick and has accommodations for about fifty guests. The Union Hotel. — This hotel is situated on the north side of Railroad Avenue, along the railroad, and was built about 1869 by J. M. Schirmer. In 1878 it passed into the possession of Theodore Doll, the present jjroprietor. The Standard House. — In 1860 Brundage Snif- fin erected this building on Railroad Avenue, directly opposite the court-house. It is now owned by Mrs. Ada Richardson, a daughter of Mr. Sniffin, and is managed by Mr. N.' Hubbard Miller. It has thirty sleeping-rooms and from its nearness to the county offices finds its largest custom from persons attending the courts. Wallace Hotel. — This hotel is located on Court Street and is well kept by Benj. F. Wallace ; it has ac- commodations for i)ermanent and transient boarders. BIOGRAPHY. DAVID CROMWELL. Several branches of the Cromwell family in Amer- ica are descended from Colonel John, third son of Richard Cromwell, and brother of the renowned Pro- tector, Oliver Cromwell. John Cromwell, son of Colonel John, emigrated from Holland to New Neth- erland, and in 1686 was a resident at Long Neck, in Westchester County, afterwards known as Cromwell's Neck. He left two sons — John and James. The Lat- ter was born in 1()96 and died in 1770, leaving three children — John, James and William. John Crom- well, the oldest son, was a resident of Harrison, born December 5, 1737. He married Anna Hopkins, of Long Island, and they were the parents of eight children — James, Daniel, John, Joseph, William, Naomi (wife of Rev. Mr. Halstead), Esther (wife of John Griffin, Jr., of North Castle), and Hannah (wife of William Field of Cortlandt. John Cromwell, the father of this family, was an active patriot during the Revolution, endured many hardships in the cause of liberty, and died at an ad- vanced age in 1805. .lames Cromwell, the oldest son, was born Novem- ber 6, 1752, and in early life worked on the farm of General Lewis Morris, at Morrisania. This dwelling '■ MAPLETON." RESIDENCE OF N. H. HAND, WHITE PLAINS, N. Y. * WHITE TLALNS. 741 was near " Cromwell's Creek,'' which derived its name from him, and after remaining here several years he removed to New York, where he conducted a grocery business, and at a later date purchased a farm in the town of Monroe, Orange County (then known as Southfield), where he passed the remainder of his days, and died December 23, 182S. He married Charlotte, daughter of Aaron Hunt, of Greenwich, Conn., and left twelve children — Hannah (wife of David Grittin ), Rebecca (wife of George Fritts), Daniel, James, Oli- ver, Ann (wife of John Haviland), David, Aaron, William, Mary (twins who died young), William and John. John, the la.-it named, was born in Monroe, July 26, 1803, engaged in business in New York, and having earned a modest competence, purchased a farm of one hundred acres in New Windsor, Orange County, where he resided during the remainder of his life. Jle was a life-long member of the Society of Friends, known and honored as a useful and worthy citizen and faithful in the performance of all the duties of life. He married Letitia, daughter of Abijah and Patience Haviland, of White Plains, N. Y., and they were the parents of four children — Walter, residing in California; .lames, of Bedford, Westchester Coun- ty ; Oliver, of New Windsor (died June 11, 1885), and David. Jlrs. Letitia Cromwell died in ISlil, and Mr. Cromwell was subsequently married to Elizabeth, daughter of Charles and Ann (Conklin) Cox, of New- burgh. David Cromwell was born in New York l\Iay 25, 1838, and at the age of eight years removed with his parents to New Windsor, N. Y. His early education was obtained at the Cornwall Collegiate School, from which he graduated as a civil-engineer and surveyor, and after practicing his profession for about one year ho went to New York and embarked in the grain trade. In 18t)2 he came to ICast Chester and established a sjtore, where he conducted business until 1879. In 1877 he wiis elected supervisor of East Chester, and re-elected in 1878. In the fall of 1878 he was unani- mously nominated by the Republican party as their candidate for the responsible office of county treas- urer, and was elected over George W. Davids (Demo- crat), who had held the office for three years and was running for re-election. The faithfulness and ability exhibited by Mr. Cromwell in the performance of his otHcial duties led to his re-election in 1881 by an in- creased majority, and in 1884 he was elected for a third term by a majority of about seven hundred, not- withstanding that the county gave a Democratic ma- jority of over thirteen hundred on the electoral ticket. His ability and integrity commanded the votes of thinking men of all parties. He married Fannie, daughter of Thomas W. and Julia Deuel, of New York City, December 3, 1873. Their children are Fannie May, born May 23, 1876, and John Chester, born July 29, 1878. XATH.YN II. II.\N1). Mr. Hand was born in Peacham, \'t., March 11, 18iy. From the district school and the academy in his native town he received his education. In early youth he went to ilontpelier, and served iis clerk in a store for a year or two, when he removed to Cincin- nati, Ohio, where he engaged in mercantile busi- ness, until failing health induced him to take a sea voyage, returning from which he went to Winchen- don, Mass. There he purchased a store and stock of goods, and engaged in a general mercantile business, and also in the manufacture of palm leaf hats, be- cnniing the largest producer of these articles in the State. A few years later he went to Middlebury, Vt., and engaged in the lumber and wood-ware manufac- ture. While he was thus employed, the marble busi- ness in that section of Vermont was attracting much attention. He became interested and bought a very extensive quarry in Piltsford, Vt., and began with great energy and industry to develop and utilize it, so that he soon competed with older and larger compan- ies, furnishing stone for New York and Boston mar- kets. Two of Boston's large hotels were built of marble sold by him. He made a number of improve- ments in cutting and (juarrying the marble, which are in use to this day. In 1867 he became connected with the gold mining interests of the State of Georgia, locating his opera- tions in and around Dahlonega, which is regarded as the very centre of the auriferous region of that State. At the time he began his operations there was hardly a successful mining enter()rise in that section. The methods for obtaining gold were almost entirely prim- itive, the mills and machinery being crude and imperfect. Under his thorough business knowledge and energy, and by backing his judgment with his means, he has, more than all others, brought the mining industry of northern Georgia to its present j)r()sperous condition. A large tract of comparatively worthless territory has become one of the most valua- ble mining properties in the State. Under a charter granted by the Legislature of Georgia, he organized the " Hall's Gold Mining Company," becoming its president by the unanimous vote of its stockholders, which office he still holds. Hydraulic mining has been largely and successfully carried on. Water has been brought a distance of more than thirty miles to supply stainj)-mills and for washing down the ore. The canals and ditches e.Kceed fifty miles in length. There are ten thousand six hundred feet of twenty- four and thirty-six inch iron pipe, and six thousand seven hundred feet of wooden pipe, of like dimensions, used in the work. I All this has been the result of Mr. Hand's skill, I pluck and perseverance. So fully is this realized in I the Georgia gold belt, that he is generally called the I father of the gold mining interests of the State, and ' no history of that enterprise can be written in which 742 HISTORY OP WESTCHESTER COUNTY. his name will not be prominently mentioned with clue credit and honor. These results and achievements of seventeen years, have not been accomplished without the expendi- ture of much thought, as well as labor and money. Obstacles in mountains, hills and streams were not only met and overcome, wliich rc(juired great mechan- ical skill and engineering ability, but Mr. Hand had to contend with legal difficulties, and the prejudices of a ]>eople aroused against the introduction of new methods of mining. The code of mining laws adopted by the Legislature in 1808, princii)al]y to encourage the hydraulic process, had not been tested in the courts of the .State- To construct canals and ditches over the lands of others for mining purposes, without their consent, though just compensation was ofl'ered, was an infringement on the people's rights, as it was said, which they were bound to resist. The courts were api)ealed to, the farther construction of the canal was enjoined by the lower tribunal and work was stopped for several months, pending the appeal to the Supreme Court of the State. For a time the entire mining industry of Georgia hung upon the question. If the miner could not get water for his stamp mills, then all operations of any magnitude must cease. The future prospects of the State as re- gards her mining intei'ests, were about to be forever blighted. Some of the ablest lawyers in Georgia were employed, and after a lengtliy discussion, the Supreme Judges decided in favor of Mr. Hand and his right to proceed with his canal. His charter was pronounced constitutional- Inch by inch he has fought his way ; and to-day through his unwearied exertions, the mining interests of the great State of Georgia have been placed upon a safe and lasting basis. Chief Justice Hiram Warner, in delivering the opinion of the court in the case alluded to (the Hand Gold Mining Company v.s. John A. Parker, et al., 59th Georgia Reports) says: "In view of the evi- dence contained in the record as to the necessity for the General Asssembly to exercise the right of Eminent Domain in granting the right of way for the defendant's ditch or canal to convey the water from Yahoola River and Cane Creek into the gold belt in the County of Lumpkin, for the successful workings of the valuable mines to be found there, so as to increase the production of gold for the use of the ])ublic through the medium of the de- fendant's corporation, the General Assembly did not exceed its Constitutional power in making the grant to the defendant of the riglit of way, as expressed in its charter. Let the defendant's ditch or canal be constructed in pursuance of the grant in the defendant's charter, and let the water from Ya- hoola River and Cane Creek flow therein into the gold belt of Lumpkin County, where, in the judgment of the General Assembly of the State, the public good requires it should flow, so as to enable the defendant to increase the production of gold on its own land, not only i'or its own use and benefit, but through its agency and organization, for the use and benefit of the public, wliich at the present moment is greatly in need of an increase of that constitutional currency recognized by the Fathers of the Republic, in 1787, as being of vital importance to the welfare and per- manent prosperity of the people." In the spring of 1885 Mr. Hand, with his family, removed from Cleveland, Ohio, where he had resided for a number of years, and settled at what is now known as JIaple Grove, on Broadway, in tlie village of White Plains, Westchester County. JOHN M. TILFORD. Mr. Tilford is one of the members of the well-known firm of Park & Tilford, New York City. He was born in Washington County, N. Y., March 16, 1815, and for twenty years remained upon his father's place en- gaged in the usual pursuit and activities of a farmer's life. In 1835 he left his native county and came to New York City, where he entered the grocery store of Ben- jamin Albro. It was while here that he first met his future partner, Mr. Park, with whom, after a clerk- ship of five years, in Mr. Albro's store, he embarked uj>on his first business venture at No. 35 Carmine Street, New Y'ork City. How successful this proved to be is well known to all who are familiar with the wholesale and retail grocery business in New York City and throughout the country. Park & Tilford, by their close attention to the details of their business, and the strict integrity which they have preserved through- out an unbroken partnership of nearly forty -six years, have won for themselves a world-wide reputation and a credit wliich is unsurpassed by that of any house of a like description in the country. Some twenty-five years since Mr. Tilford began the purchiise of ground in Westchester County, and is now the possessor of many acres of farming land in and about the towns of Harrison and White Plains. He has a handsome residence in White Plains, and is well known in its social circles. In 1840 he married Miss Jennie White. He has two sons, Charles E. and Frank, both of whom are engaged in business with their father. His business foresight, together with his genial manner, have caused liis advice to be widely sought in financial circles and have endeared him both to those in his emjiloy and to the many whose business brings them into daily contact with him. JOHN "W. YOUKG. Mr. Young, who is a well-known business man in the village of White Plains, was born in New Castle, March 28, 1824. His father, John, and his grand- father, James Young, were also natives of New Cas- tle. The children of John Young (who married Sarah, daughter of Peter Carpenter) were Mary, wife RESIDENCE OF J. M. TILFORD, WHITE PLAI^S N V. I I WHITE PLAINS. 743 of Robert Purdy ; Deborah, wife of Edward Haight; Eliza, who married Conkling Kip ; P>meline, wife of J. Reynolds ; Lydia, De Witt C, Jackson, Asa, .Jesse, John W. and Harrison. When he had reached the age of fourteen, John W. Young left home and went to Somers, where he worked on a farm, and subsequently removed to Sing Sing, where he engaged in business with his brother. He then wont to New York and remained in business there for five years, and afterwards went to Mount Kisco. whence he came to White Plains, which has since been his residence. Here he engaged in the lumber and coal business, which proved extensive and prosperous and is now conducted by his sons and nepliews. He married Hester, daughter of Daniel Trip. They have three chil- dren, — Albert, Irving W. and Laura E. The elegant residence of Mr. Young was built by him in 1874, and is one of the finest private d w e 1 1 i n g s in White Plains. BAKTHOI.OMEW GEDXEY. The family of this name are said to have come from the north of England long before the Revolution. John Ged- ney, who resided in York- town, near Crompond, died about 17G3, leaving a family of five children, — John ; Polly, wife ot Monmouth Hart ; Betsy, wife of Wil- liam Havi- land ; Mar- tha, wife of Covert ; and Sarah, wife of Edward Bugbee. Of these children, .John, the only sou, was born April 16,1761. His father, who was a farmer, died when the son was two years old, and he went to live with his uncle Bartholomew at While Plains. Upon the decease of his uncle he inherited the homestead and fifty acres of land. His early circumstances were un- favorable and he enjoyed few educational and relig- ious advantages. During the whole of his life he was a farmer, a business which he conducted with such success that at the time of his death he was the owner of a farm of three hundred acres in a higli state of cultivation, and was generally considered one of the best agriculturists in the county. He was a devoted and lil)eral member of the Methodist Cluirch, and highly esteemed as a citi7,en. He married Mary, daughter of Benjamin Lyon, and they were the pa- rents of ten children, — Margaret, born May 27, 1786, married Peter Cornell ; Esther, born January 24, 1788, married Anthony Martine; Abigail, born No- vember 1(), 1789, married Nathaniel Tompkins; Eliz- abeth A., born .January 29, 1792, died unnuirried in 1831; Phebe, born June 6, 1794, married George Wildey ; Dorothy was born August 27, 1796; Char- lotte, born June 20, 1800, married Edward Billington ; Bartholomew was born April 22, 1802 ; Elijah L. was boru'May 5, 1804; Mary L., born September 6, 1806, married Charles Whiting, of New York ; and John B. was born June 4, 1808. After a long life of active usefulness Mr. (Jedney died December 28, 1841, and rests in the old burying-ground by the Methodist Church in White Plains. liartholomew Gedney, the oldest son of this family, has passed his entire life on the ances- tral farm inherited from his father. Of an ex- ceedingly industrious na- ture, he has devoted his time and labor to the improvement of his es- tate, and is widely known as one of the most ac- complished agriculturists in the county. Upon this larm one hundred and twelve bushels of shell- ed corn have been raised upon an acre of land, while wheat at the rate of forty-seven bushels, and hay to the extent of five tons per acre have been produced. His stock of Short Horn cattle is not excelled by any herd in this section of the country. He is an active member of the Methodist Church, which he joined in 1844. With an active interest in politics, he feels an honest pride in the fact that his first vote was cast for John Quincy Adams, and he has never failed to vote at every Presidential election since that time. He is now a stanch supporter of the Repul)lican i)arty. He has been a member of the F'armers' Club of Bedford for many years, and very 744 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. frequently took premiums at the Westchester County Fairs while the society had an existence. Mr. Gedney married, in 1824, Ann Eliza, daughter of William Hunt, of Tarrytown. They have six children, — Ann A., John, William H., Mary L., wife of William Horton ; Jane H., wife of William Banks, of New Castle ; and Bartholomew, Jr. The residence .of Mr. Gedney is pleasantly situated on the north side of the Ridgeway road, and is surrounded by highly cultivated farms that smile with abundant harvests. HON. WILLIAM M. OLLIPFE. Commissioner OlliSe, as he was commonly called, was in so far a Westchester man as that he spent each spring and summer for many years at "Edgewood," his country residence, in the town of Greenburgh. A fondness for fine cattle, for rural life and for out-door sports, besides genial ways and pleasant manners, made him welcome at every fair and agricultural muster. He was perhaps more widely known through- out the county than most of its citizens, through the smartness of his turnouts, the speed of his roadsters and the scrupulousness of his own appearance, which bespoke a city man rather than a country gentle- man. Mr. Olliffe wiis born in 1843, in Broome Street, then a fashionable quarter of New York. His grandfather, John Olliffe, one of the Irish patriots of 1798, came hither with Thoniiis Addis Emmett and others, to es- cape British persecution, before the beginning of the century. About the same time a nephew of the same ancestor went to India and became, in turn, Catholic Bishop and Archbishop of Calcutta. His father. Dr. William J. Olliffe, was a physician of distinction in a family of physicians, one of whom was long body physician to Louis XVI. and another. Sir Joseph, was physician to the British embassy at Paris and to Emperor Louis Napoleon. He came, too, of a nota- ble family on the side of his mother, the daughter of Cornelius T. Williams, whose lands on Manhattan Island included what is now Union Square and ex- tended northward along Broadway to the present Madison Scpiare. Mr. Olliffe received his general and classical school- ing from the celebrated Dr. Anthon. Later he at- tended and graduated from the College of Pharmacy, of which be was long a trustee and patron. As became a gentleman of cultivation and of means, he traveled through most of the States of the Union, visited the Mexican republic and made an extended tour in Europe. On his return from the Continent he married the only daughter of Jordan L. Mott, the ironmaster of Mott Haven. In his early manhood and on the death of his father he succeeded to Dr. Olliffe's business as a pharmacist, which he continued as proprietor in such a way as to leave him large leis- ure for social and other engagements. Although he never ran for office, he took a lively concern in pub- lic affairs and in the political fortunes of his party friends, particularly of Samuel J. Tilden and Edward Cooper. The latter made him commissioner under the Rapid Transit Act and also commissioner of public parks in New York City. He was likewise appointed by Mayor Grace to the same municipal department of which he was respectively president and treasurer. Early in 1883 neglect of a cold allowed a bronchial trouble to become so fastened that he foresaw it never could be shaken off by nursing or medical aid. Then he gave up his customary season at Saratoga and sold his place at Long Branch, preparing to adjust his affairs. In the autumn of the following year he was missed from the races and gatherings which he had graced and enjoyed. The winter found him too feeble to journey southward, as be had done before, and confined him, reluctant but uncomplaining, within doors to suffer a painful illness and to pass away at the very commencement of the spring from the town house of his father-in-law, a little before midnight, the 9th of March, 1885. Even those who knew him best knew not how widely and how well he had endeared himself, until a few day later, at his funeral, the Church of the Pu- ritans was crowded within and thronged without, not only by dignitaries of the city, judges from the bench and members of his societies and clubs, but also by people of humbler rank than himself, who came to offer a last expression of affection for a friend and benefactor. CHAPTER XIX. king's bridge, by thomas h. edsall, of the New York bar. Description. — The area under consideration — about four thousand acres — lies just south of the city of Yonkers. ' Its boundaries are the Yonkers city line on the north, the Bronx on the east, the late West Farms line, ^ Harlem River and Spuyten Duy- vil Creek on the south, and the Hudson on the west. Its northernmost point, Mount St. Vincent, is about twelve miles from White Plains and fifteen miles from the city hall. New York. Its outlines extend along the Yonkers city line three miles, the Bronx one and five-tenths miles, the West Farms line one and five-tenths miles, the Harlem River and Spuyten 1 This name, derived from Dr. Adraien Van der Donck's title of Jonier, was not applied to any part of the present Yonkers until the erection of the township of that name, in 1788. Before that date for more tlian a i century "tlie Yonkers" or "the Yonkers Plantation," was the name [ of a precinct which comprised the greater part of the township of ' King's Bridge, while the present Yonkers was called Phillipsburgh, be- ing part of the manor of that name, erected in 1093, 2 Coincident with the north line of the Manor of Fordham, erected 1 November, 1671. i I k KING'S BRIDGE. 745 Duyvil Creek one and five-tenths miles, and the Hud- sou two and five-tenths miles. Topographically, it consists of two main ridges and an intermediate one, liaving their axes parallel with the Palisades of New Jersey, and a direction north- northeast. 1. Spuyten Duyvil Kidge, from Yonkers city line to Spuyten Duyvil Creek, and between the Hudson on the west and Tippett's Brook ' on the east. Greatest elevation, two hundred and eighty-two feet, ' ou land of Frederick Goodridge, Iliverdale. 2. Valen- tine's Ridge, from Yonkers line to West Farms line, and between the Bronx ^ on the east and Tippett's Brook on the west. Greatest elevation, two hundred and forty feet, near Woodlawn Heights. 8. Van Cortlandt Ridge, intermediate, from Y'onkers line to Vault Hill, between Tippett's Brook on the east and its main branch on the west. Greatest elevation, two hundred feet, near Yonkers city line. Tippett's Brook, the main stream, rises in Yonkers, rtows southwesterly until it forms Van Cortlandt Lake,* below which it is a tidal stream to its outlet into Spuyten Duyvil Creek. About twenty lesser brooks, varying in length from five hundred to ten thousand feet, flow into the Hudson, the Bronx and Tippett's Brook. The geological formations are very ancient, consist- ing mainly of micaceous gneiss or granite, * the former largely preponderating, the exposed surfaces indicat- ingsubjectionto intense heatand pressure, with so great displacement that the strata are nearly vertical, out- cropping in numerous parallel ledges, not continuous, but cii echelon, and giving steep inclination to hill- sides. A coarse, crystallized limestone" of varying hardness, ranging about north-northeast, crops out at King's Bridge and on the Whiting and Delafield estates, Spuyten Duyvil Ridge. On the latter ridge the surface of the primary rocks is strewn with trap boulders. DiscovEKY. — The earliest known visitor to this lo- cality was Henry Hudson. Going up the river which bears his name, he skirted its westerly shore Septem- ber 13, 1609, and, on his return, was attacked, Oc- ' So called after George Tippett, an early settler and proprietor, and of late corrupted into Tibbilt'e Brook. Its Indian name was Jloshohi. It has also been known as Mill Creek and Yonkers Hirer. ■-The highest ground within the limits of New York City. The eleva- tion of Fort W'ashington, the greatest on Manhattan Island, is two hun- dred and sixty-four feet. 3 So called after Jonas Bronck, the earliest white settler and proprietor of "Bronck's Land," now Morriaania, Twenty-third Ward, New York. '.\n arliticial pond, formed by Jacobus Van Cortlandt, circum 1700, by damming Tippett's Brook. 5.\ffording building-stone of fine quality. Before 1750 quarries of "broken stone " were worked on Spuyten Duyvil Ridge, the whole ex- tent of which is scarred by them. The large quarries at Spuyten Duyvil Point were worked until about IS.'iO. ' Known as Kiiufs Bridge Mitrble. It was extensively quarried early in the century on the northerly end of Manhattan Island. Perkins Nich- oUs had a marble-sawing mill at " Dyckman's Cut " (which wa« exca- vated to supply power to this mill by the ebb and How of the tide), and another at the King's Bridge. On the banks of the Hudson, along ths base of Spuyten Duyvil Ridge, were several kilns for making lime from this stone, all of which have been disused for many years. 70 tober 2d, from Shomck-Kappock, the Indian name of Spuyten Duyvil Point,' and the kill or creek at its base. Indians. — The Indian name of this section was Weckqwieskeek, — " the birch-bark country," — and its residents were known to the first settlers as Wickers- creek Indians. In person they were tolerably stout. Their hair was worn shorn to a coxcomb on top, with a long lock depending on one side. They wore bea- ver and other skins, with the fur inside in winter and outside in summer, and also coats of turkey feathers. They were valiant warriors. " Yea," says De Vries, " they say they are Manetto — the devil himself! '' Their leading sachems, at the advent of white set- tlers, were Tequeiaet, Eechgairac and Packamiens, from whom the Dutch director, Kieft, purchased, in Au- gust, 16-19, the tract Keskeskick. This tribe gradually dwindled, until its remnant finally disappeared be- fore the end of the eighteenth century. First Skttlement. — The earliest white resident and proprietor was Dr. Adraien Van der Donck,y«m ufriusque doctor, of Leyden. He had been sheriff" of the Colonic of Rensselaerswyck since 1641. Having aided Director Kieft in negotiating an important In- dian treaty at Fort Orange, Albany, the latter granted him, in 1645, a large tract on the Nep- perhaem River, Yonkers, where he built a saw-mill,* laid out farms and plantations-and " had actually re- solved to continue." But that indispensable requi- site of a Dutch farm, salt meadow, was lacking. In search of this, Van der Donck found, about a mile above the irading-phice (King's Bridge) " a flat, with some convenient meadows about it," which he promptly secured by purchase from the Indians and a further grant from Kieft. His new acquisition in- cluded the area under consideration, extending from the Hudson to the Bronx, and from the Spuyten Duy- vil Creek to the Nepperhaem tract. Here he located his bowerie, or home-farm, with its " planting-field," and near the latter he had already begun the erection of his house, before going to Holland, in 1649, as the representative of the commonalty of New Amster- dam. Van der Donck's " planting-field " was on the plain or flat of the Van Cortlandt estate, lying be- tween Broadway and the present lake, and extending up to the southerly end of Vault 11111.** It is prob- able that his house was on the flat, and located, per. haps, where the old house of Jacobus Van Cortlandt afterwards stood until the early part of this century.'" While absent in Holland, Van der Donck's lands were erected into the fief or Colonie of Nepper- haem (or, as he called it after his own name, Colen- 1 According to tradition, the natives had a castle or stronghold on the point. silence the name of "Saw Kill," by which this stream became known. ' It may have also stretched eastward across the brook and beyond the site of the present lake. 1'' Its site was just behind the present grove of locusts, north of the Van Cortlandt Mills. 74G HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. donck), and he was made its i)atroon. Pursuant to the " Freedoms and Exemptions," he sent out to it, from Holland, a number of colonists with supplies of farming stock and implements. In 1652 he was about to return io his colonie, and had already embarked his wife, mother, brother and sister, with an ample stock of goods, when the West India Company pre- vented his departure.' During his detention he got word that some " land-greedy " persons were squat- ting on his lands. He appealed to the company to protect his possession of the " flat and meadows ;" also tor leave to return to them, which was withheld until 1653. In the summer of that year he sailed for Nieuw Netherland, arriving in the autumn, and repaired to his boicerie. He did not long survive his return, dy- ing in 1654 or 1655. The latter was the year of the Indian massacre, when all the surviving settlers about Nieuw Amsterdam fled to the fort for protection. It is probable that Van der Donck's bowerie was de- serted and destroyed. In August, Stuyvesant granted to a Cornelis Van der Donck a parcel of about fifty morgens, on the north side of Manhattan Island, " by the savages called Muscoote, or a flat {anders een vlacte)" and as much meadow or hay land as was given to other boweries. This may have referred to the late Dr. Van der Donck's bowerie, but no further mention has been found of the grantee or his connec- tion with this tract. After the patroon's death his widow joined her father, the Rev. Francis Doughty, in "the Virgin- ias," where she became the wife of Hugh O'Neale, of Patuxcnt, Maryland. The province had jjassed under English rule, and nearly ten years had elapsed since the death of her first husband before Mrr. O'Xeale took any steps to reclaim the Yonkers estate. On the 2l8t of Septem- ber, 16i56, she and O'Neale went before Governor NicoU and his Council, accompanied by several In- dians, who had formerly owned the lands. The latter made acknowledgment of their sales to the late pa- troon,^ and on the 8th of October a grant of the whole estate was made to O'Neale and wife. On the 30th they assigned their patent to Elias Doughty, of Flushing, L. I., a brother of Mrs. O'Neale, probably for convenience of sale, un account of their residing at a distance. The first to purchase from Doughty was John Archer, or Jan Arcer, as he signed his name. He was 1 Van der Donck had so well accomplished his mission on behalf of the oppressed commonalty as to procure from the irtates General their mandate, recalling Stuyvesant to Holland, of which he was made the bearer. But the States being on the eve of war with England, and need- ing the assistance of the rich and powerful West India Company, the latter was enabled to, not only procure the revocation of Stuyvesant's re- call, but to detain its bearer in Holland. 2 Of " a certain parcel of laud upon the maine, not farre from W'eat- " Chester, commonly called y« Youuckers Laud." They declared its bounds to be "from a place called Miicackeiiii at y<^ nortli, so to come to Neperan "and to Kill Sonjuupp, then to Mttskotn and Papperem-man to ye south "and crosse y c(uiiitrey to y eastward of Bronck.\ liis lUver and " Land." the son of Jan Aarsen, from Nieuwhoft', who was nick- named by the Dutch Koop-al (buy-all), and the son was known as Jan Koop-al, the younger. He had long resided at Oost Dorp (now Westchester). In March and September, 1667, he bought about one hundred and twenty acres of upland and thirty acres of meadow, near the " wading-place." On the up- land, just across the meadow from Paparinamin, he founded the village of Fordham. It had the counte- nance and protection of the Governor, being " in a "convenient place for the relief of strangers, it being " the road for passengers to go to and fro the maine, " as well as for mutual intercourse with the neighbor- " ing colony." The village consisted of about a dozen houses in an extended line, along the base of Tetard's Hill, crossed at the middle by the " old Westchester path" (Albany post road), leading up over the hill towards Connecticut. No traces of these old habita- tions remain. Two years later Archer acquired all the land southerly to High Bridge, lying between the Harlem and Bronx, which was erected into his Manor of Fordham in 1671. The north line of this ancient manor from the Harlem to the Bronx, being the south line of the O'Neale patent,^ became one of the south- erly boundaries of the town of King's Bridge. Archer lived and ruled at Fordham in frequent contention with his tenants and neighbors until his death, in 1684. During the Dutch re-occupation, in 1673-74, his government was suspended, and the inhabitants of Fordham nominated their own magistrates ; but on the return of the English, in the latter year, Archer resumed his sway. In 1679 he was sheriff of New York. At his death the manor was so heavily mort- gaged to the wealthy Dutchman, Cornelis Steenwyck, that his heirs could not redeem it. By Steenwyck's will it was devised to the " Nether Dutch Reformed Congregation." in New York, for the support of their minister. William Betts and George Tippett, his son-in-law, next purchased from Doughty (deed, July 6, 1668), about two thousand acres, extending across from the Hudson to the Bronx, south of an east and west line which went along the north side of " Van der Donck's planting-field." This line struck the Hudson about 3 Notwithstanding the patent for the Manor of Fordham recited that it was part of tlie land "granted in the Grand Patent to Hugh O'Nea'e Jlan-, his wife ; " also that " purchase was made thereof by John Archer from Elyas Doughty, who was invested in their interest, «* also of the Imhjan Proprirlort, ic," it is impossible, by any interpretation of the boundaries in the O'Xeale Patent to make them extend below the north line of the manor. There is no record of any deed from Doughty to Archer of land south of that line. The writer is of opinion that Archer, conniving with the Governor or Secretary Nicoll, advancen of Columliia College, in 17^4, was made professor of French, auQ so continued until his death, December 6, 1787, in his sixty-sixth year. * So declared in a letter shortly prior to his resignation. lie meant to come to .\merica, " where his pride and poverty would be much more at their ease.'' 5 \ little way inside of the gateway of Mr. William Ogden Giles. O.Veic I'nrk G'i.-.elleer, October 7, 177.1, contains his advertisement of the King's Bridge farm " at jirivate sab ." 750 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. and his brother Frederick, of the Yonkers, heartily favored resistance. The news from Lexington was shouted at every threshold along the old Boston road in the night of April 22d, as the herald spurred on towards New York. A few days later the inhabitants were aiding to unload, at King's Bridge and the hills beyond, upward of one hundred cannon,' which had been carted out from the city for security. On the 8th of May the new committee for Westchester County, on which Frederick Van Cortlandt represented the Yonkers, chose Colonel James Van Cortlandt as deputy to the new Provincial Congress, and he attended its first meeting at the exchange in Broad Street. The importance of maintaining communication by land between New York and the country so impressed the Continental Congress that it resolved, on May 25th, that a post should be immediately taken and fortified at King's Bridge. On the 30th the Pro- vincial Congress appointed a committee of five, in- cluding Captain Richard Montgomery and Colonel James Van Cortlandt to view the ground near the bridge and report whether it would admit of a tenable fortification. Their report of June 3d favored a post for three hundred men on the hill adjoining Hyatt's tavern, but recommended no form or dimensions and thought it imprudent to fortify until the embodi- ment of troops, who could do most of the labor. Commanding points on Tippett's and Tetard's Hillg were suggested for additional works. On the spots thus indicated forts were afterwards erected by the Americans, and when captured by the British, were strengthened and garrisoned by them for many years. Colonel Van Cortlandt was a member of the com- mittee of the Provincial Congress to arrange the troops and form the militia. ' Frederick Van Cortlandt, Thomas Emmons, Williams Betts and William Hadley were of the local committee for the Yonkers. Under their supervisiofn a militia company was formed in the precinct, as part of the "South Battal- ion" of the county. The roster included sixty-four names, — Anthony Allaire, Abraham Asten, George Berrien, Wm. Betts, Frederick, Gilbert and Robert Brown, Hendrick Browne,Jr., Henry Bur.«en,Jno. Cock, Jno. and Edw'dCortright, Geo. and Jas. Crawford, Jno. Cregier, Daniel Deen, John Devoe, Abraham Em- mons, Benj., Thos. and Robert Farrington, Usial Fountain, Wm. and Isaac Green, Geo., Isaac, Jos. and Wm. Hadley, Thos. Merrill, Jas. Munro, Jos. Jr., and Thos. Oakley, Abraham and John Odell, Jas. Parker, Abm. Dennis, Isaac, Israel, Jacob, Lewis, Martin and Wm. Post, Henry Presher, Tobias Rickman, Wm. Rose, Edward and John Ryer, Francis Smith, Chas. •Compensation to the heirs of Sebring and Beekman, for certain of these guns, was provided for by an act of the Legislature, passed in 1801). 2 The Britisli called tlie redoubt on the hill near Hyatt's tavern "Ft. Prince Charles; " the one on Tippett's Hill " yumber TJiiee, and the one on Tetard's Hill, the American Ft. Independence, " Xumber Four." Elnathan, Jr., Elijah, Henry and Jacob Taylor, Izarell Underbill, Frederick Van Cortlandt, Abm, Frederick and Josh. Vermilye, John and Wm. Warner, Geo. Wertz, John and Samuel Williams. On August 24, 1775, they chose John Cock, captain ; Wm. Betts, first lieutenant : John Warner, second lieutenant ; and Jacob Post, ensign. The names were sent to the Pro- vincial Congress for commissions. The county com- mittee protested against the captain elect, and on the 11th of September presented the affidavit of William Hadley, of the district committee, that when he pre- sented the " general association " to Cock, he said, " I sign this with my hand, but not with my heart ; for I would not have signed it, had it not been for my wife and family's sake." The friends of Cock rallied to his support. A majority of the company and a score more inhabitants of Yonkers sent down a petition in his favor, stating that he had been chosen " for his well-known skill and ability in the military disci- pline," and that the complaints were made out of " spite and malice." But further affidavits by Isaac Green and George Hadley, that Cock " had damned the Continental Congress," satisfied the Committee of Safety that it was improper to give Cock a commission. The local committee was ordered to hold a new elec- tion, " taking care to give public notice that John Cock cannot be admitted to any ofiice whatso- ever." * The twenty-one nine-pounders carried off from the Battery by the Sons of Liberty, August 23d, were hauled up to King's Bridge and left with the rest in care of the minute men. In the night of January 17r 1776, more than fifty guns near Williams', and as many in the fields near Isaac Valentine's, were spiked or " loaded and stopped with stones and other rubbish." Search was made for the perpetrators. John Fowler was brought before the Committee of Safety on the 23d, charged with a recent purchase of rat-tail files in New York. He implicated William Lounsbery, of Mamaroneck, as the real purchaser. They were imprisoned. Jacamiah Allen was employed to unspike the guns at twenty shillings each. He raised them on fires of several cords of wood, tended day and night to soften the spikes, and by March 16th he had unspiked eighty-two and expected to soon complete the work. These guns were afterwards mounted 3 They were Matthias, Anthony and Benjamin Archer, Benjamin Ars- dan, Stephen Bastine, Ezekial and Henry Brown, George Crawford, Benjamin Farrington, Jonathan Fowler, John Guereneau, Samuel Law- rence, Henry and Jordan Norris, David, Jr., and Moses Oakley, Abm. , James and Thomas Rich, Elnathan Taylor and Thomas Tippett. * Cock kept the old tavern on the north side of King's Bridge. The head of the overthrown statue of George III., in the Bowling Green, was carried to Fort Washington, to be fixed to a spike on the flag-staff. While it was left temporarily at Jacob Moore's tavern, near by, an emissary from Colonel Montresor went out through the "rebel camp" with a message to Cock to steal and bury the head. This was done (probably at Cock's tavern), and when the British arrived, in November, 1776, it was dug up and sent in care of Lady Gage to Lord Townsend, " to con- vince them at home of the infamous disposition of the ungrateful people of this distracted country." KING'S BRID(;E 751 in the works erected by the American troops on the hills about King's Bridge. In February, 1776, Augustus Van Cortlandt, clerk of New York City, rejjorted to the Committee of Safety that for their security he had removed the public records to Yonkers. They were deposited in Colonel Van Cortlandt's family burial vault' and were still there in December ; but it is probable the British were soon afterwards apprised of their place of concealment and had them returned to the city. On the ISth of March the Yonkers militia held a new election and chose John Warner, captain ; Jacob Post, first lieutenant ; Samuel Lawrence, second lieutenant; and Isaac Post, ensign. In May the Pro- vincial Congress had in service the armed schooner "General Putnam," commanded by Captain Thomas Cregier, of King's Bridge. After months of inactivity at the heads of inlets when he should have been at sea, Cregier was discharged for inefficiency and the vessel was sold. Early in June Washington visited and inspected the grounds above King's Bridge. He found them to admit of seven places well calculated for defense. " Esteeming it a pass of the utmost importance in order to keep open communication with the coun. try," he set two Pennsylvania regiments at work on their fortification, and put bodies of militia to the same labor as fast as they arrived. In General Orders of July 2d, Mifflin was directed to repair to King's Bridge and to use his utmost endeavors to forward the works. " The time is now at hand which must probably determine whether Americans are to be f'reeme7i or slaves" is a memorable sentence in this order. The enemy was ready to disembark in the lower bay. It was unknown from what quarter their attack would come. Mifliin thought they would di- vert attention to the heights above King's Bridge, and it was reported they meant to erect strong works there to cutoff communication between city and country. On the 12th of July the ships of war "Rose" and "Ph(enix" sailed up the Hudson, and unaware of the new batteries which had been j)lanted on Tip- pett's and Cock Hills, anchored near the mouth of Spuyten Duyvil Creek. A dozen guns opened fire on them and " did great execution." On the 15th additional troDps were hurried out to King's Bridge, the destruction of which was apprehended. I'hree hundred men were sent up the Harlem River in boats on the 19th and were put to work on the forts. Engineers were assigned, tools supplied and the work carried on night and day during the ensuing fort- night. On the 8th of August General Clinton was directed to send expresses to Ulster. Dutchess, Orange and Westchester Counties, to hasten levies and march them down to the fort erected on the north side of the bridge. On the 13th General Heath was 1 This ancieot depository of the city records is still used m a burial- place by the family, aud gives the name to tlio hill on which it is lo- cated. put in command of the division stationed there and large ([uantities of provisions aud ammunition were sent up. The " Rose "and " Plxenix " with their tenders were anchored off Mt. St. Vincent. On the nights ol the 14th, IGth and IGth numbers of oflicers and men, (including on two occasions Generals Heath and Clinton) gathered on Tippett's Hill to witness an at- tempt to destroy these vessels with fire-ships. It was made at midnight on the 17tli. A fiamiiig galley set fire to one of the tenders and consumed her with " horrid flames." At sunrise on the IHth the frigates and remaining tenders fied down stream, and ran through the chevaux-de-frise under a heavy cannonade from the " Blue Bell Fort " ^ and Fort Lee. On the 21st Washington assigned the new engineer Monsieur Martin to the post at King's Bridge and under his direction work was pressed on the fortifications. On the 23d Clinton's brigade was ordered into camp. Colonel Thomas's regiment pitched on the south side of Fort Independ- ence, Colonel Graham's about half a mile farther southward, Colonel Paulding's and Colonel Nicholas' on the Hat below, near Corsa's orchard, and Colonel Swartwout on the southerly end of Tipi)ett's Hill. On the 25th a detachment went down from King's Bridge to Paulus Hook in "the flat-bottomed boat" and brought back a number of gun-carriages, on which cannon were mounted in the new works. Colonel Swartwout's regiment threw up a battery " on the north side of Spuyten Duyvil Creek, at its very mouth," to prevent the enemy from approaching the bridge in boats, and also constructed two additional redoubts on the top of Tippett's Hill, one of which was called " P^ort Swartwout." No "fatigue rum "was allowed to any one engaged on these works, except on certificate that he had been " faithful, obedient and industrious." On the 27th the Provincial Congress, then sitting at Harlem, alarmed by the defeat on Long Island, ordered its records and papers, and the receiver-general's chest to be taken at once to the camp at King's Bridge. On the 29th Heath impressed every boat and craft at the post and hurried them down to Washington for use in the retreat from Long Island. On the 31st the inhabitants began driving their cattle into the interior. The Committee of Safety now urged on Washington the defensibility of the country above the bridge and the dreadful conse- quences of its occupation by the enemy. He replied that the defensible state of that ground had not es- caped him, and that as the posts at King's Bridge were of such great importance, he hoped the con- vention would artbrd aid for their defense. When it became evident in September that the city was un- tenable by the Americans in the face of the superior British force, Washington determined to take post at King's Bridge and along the Westchester shore, where - Fort Washington, near n liicli the old Blue Bell tavern stood. 'The night guard in this work, October 17, 1770, was one captain, two lieutenants and fifty men. V52 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. barracks could be procured for the part of the army without tents. He concluded to leave five thousand men on the island for defense of the city, and to post nine thousand at King's Bridge and its dependencies. On the 8th Heath was instructed to fell trees across the roads towards the bridge, to dig holes in them, break them up and destroy them so as to be impassable. The next day one hundred and sixty thousand boards were ordered for the barracks at the bridge, also brick and stones for ovens, which all soldiers who were masons were ordered to assist in making. Meanwhile the inhabitants suffered from the occu- pation of their farms. Fences were pulled down and burned and corn-fields, gardens and orchards pillaged. The orders of the day pronounced it "cruel as well as unjust and scandalous thus to destroy the inhab- itants by destroying the little property for which they have been sweating and toiling through the summer and were expecting very soon to reap the fruits of." Howe's movement to Throg's Neck caused Wash- ington to call a meeting of general officers at King's Bridge. It was held on the 16th of October, when it was determined to abandon Manhattan Island. On the 19th strong pickets were established and frequent night patrols made through all the region about King's Bridge. On the 20th Washington moved his headquarters to the bridge, where the main army was now in barracks, and continued there until the 22d. During the next few days the army moved off to the heights of the Bronx, leaving garrisons in the forts about King's Bridge under orders to destroy them on the enemy's approach in force. Col. Lasher, in Fort Indei>endence, was "to burn the barracks, quit the post and join the army, by way of the North River, at White rlains." At three in the morning of the 28th the lon^ lines of barracks were fired and the forts abandoned. Their garrisons either withdrew to Fort Washington, or, crossing to New Jersey, rejoined their regiments at White Plains by way of King's Ferry. Gen. Greene, coming out from Fort Washington, found several hundred stand of small arms, great numbers of spears, shot, shells, etc. To carry these off he impressed all the wagons in the neighborhood. He then dismantled King's Bridge and the Free Bridge. On the evening of the 29th General Knyphausen, with a force of Hessians and Waldeckers which had landed at New Rochelle, ap- proached Fort Independence by the old Boston road, and, finding it deserted, occupied it the following day. He took possession of the other works on Tetard's Hill and occupied them until November 2d. Then, with part of his forces, he descended and took a position on Paparinamin, north of King's Bridge. Having repaired the bridge, he crossed over and occupied the deserted American post on the opposite hill, but retired on the 4th. He crossed again on the 7th with fifteen hundred men and took positions on the hills commanding the old King's Bridge road. On the 16th the remainder of General Knyphausen's force crossed over the Free Bridge and united in the capture of Fort Washington, which thereafter took his name. Being now possessed of the whole of Manhattan Island, the British adopted and strengthened the American works at and about King's Bridge for the defense of New York City. Beginning with the westerly redoubt on Spuyten Duyvil Neck, and going eastward, and from Fort Independence southward, they were distinguished by the numbers 1 to 8, inclu- sive. Number One was located where the house of the late Peter 0. Strang stands, in grading for which all traces of the fort were obliterated. It was square, and overlooked the Hudson and Spuyten Duyvil Creek at their confluence. Number Two was a circular redoubt on the crown of the hill in the field west of Warren B. Sage's resi- dence. Its walls are yet discernible.^ This was the American Fort Swartwout. In the adjoining field to the westward a flanking redan may yet be seen over- looking the Riverdale road. Number Three stood where Warren B. Sage's house now stands, on the easterly brow of Spuyten Duyvil Hill and directly overlooking the post on the north- erly end of Manhattan Island at King's Bridge, called Fort Prince Charles^ by the British. Numbers one, two and three were first garrisoned in 1777. In No- vember, 1778, the three works had a garrison of one hundred and ten officers and men. They were aban- doned by the British in the fall of 1779. The creek near Johnson's foundry was crossed by a pontoon bridge, and a military road ran from it up the easterly side of the hill to and along Spring Street, where it branched off to the Redoubts One, Two and Three. Number Four was the American Fort Independence, on Tetard's Hill, across the valley. The house of William Ogden Giles now stands on its site. It was built on the farm of General Richard Montgomery, and may have been laid out by him. It occupied a most commanding position overlooking the Albany road on one side and the Boston road on the other. It had two bastions at the westerly angles. The British garrisoned it continuously from its cap- ture until they removed its guns, August 16th, its wood-work, August 17th, and demolished its maga- zine, September 12, 1779. It was not garrisoned again during the war. A number of iron six-pounders were dug up inside its walls, by Mr. Giles, when excavat- ing his cellar, about thirty years ago. Two of them are now mounted in a miniature fort on his grounds. 1 Miscalled " Ft. Independence," on Sauthier's and other British maps, an error which has misled some modern writers. The same misnomer has heen ])erpetuated otherwise. Tlie Coast Survey so calls it in a diagram of the triangulation point on its wall. These errors prohably arose from confounding the name " Tetard's Hill," on which Fort Independence stood, with "Tippett's Hill," wheron the fort in question was located. - This work is yet standing. KING'S Number Five was a square redoubt, whose walls are yet standing on the old Tetard farm, a little way north from H. B. Claflin's stal)les. It is about seventy feet square. It was occupied in 1777, and dismantled September 18, 1779. Number Six stood just west of the present road to Hifrh Bridge, and its site is now occui>icd by a house formerly owned by John B. Haskin. Number Sercti was on the Cammann place. No trace remains. Number Eight was on land now owned by H. W. T. Mali and Gustav Schwab. The latter's house occu- pies part of its site. Kiiif/'s Battery is on the grounds of Nathaniel P. Bailey, and is still preserved. Another redoubt, semicircular in form, is yet standing on the old Bussing farm, just north of the town line, and distant about one thousand feet northeasterly from the William's Bridge Station on the Harlem Rail- road. It commanded the road and bridge across the Bronx, and was one of the series of works thrown up by Washington along the heights of the Bronx and extending northerly to White Plains, at the approach of Howe. General Heath located it and Colonels Ely and Douglas were engaged upon it October 6, 1776. • An outpost of light trooi)s was estal)lished near lyiosholu and maintained throughout each year. The force was usually composed of German mounted and foot yagers and a company of chasseurs formed of detachments from the difterent Hessian regiments in New York. - Their camp was on Frederick Van Cortlandt's farm, near his house. ' They made fre- quent patrols out Mile Square road, over Valentine's Hill and Boar Hill to Phillipse's Mills and back by the Albany post road. Two three-pound Amuitettes were sometimes taken on these rounds. Another camp of light troops and cavalry was es- tablished at the foot of Tetard's Hill, between King's Bridge and the Free Bridge. It was long occupied by Emmerick's chasseurs, formed in 1777, Simcoe's rangers and other Royalist troops. The King's Bridge was made the Barrier, and the old tavern on the north side became the watch-house. ' Between tliis fort and Fort Imlepenelence, on the southerly siile of the Biiiiton roail, and on the Corua farm, stood " Negro Fort," 8o called, it i< said, because garrisoned hy a company of negroes from Virginia. The British kept an outguard there in the winter of 1776-77. Xo trace of it remains, a house now occupying its site. 2 In 1778 five companies of foot and one of mounted yagers, under Lieu- tenant Colonel Von Wurmli. In 1779 the yagere and Lord Rawdon's <-.)rps. Captain von Hanger's company of chasseurs, in 1778, consisted of four officers, twelve sub-offlcers, three drummers and one hundred privates selected from the Leib, Erb Prinz, Prinz Carl, Donop, Jlirhack, Trim- bach, Losberg, Knyphausen, Woelwarth, Wiessenbach and Sietz Regi- ments. •'Known as the "Upper Cortlaudts," in distinction from Colonel .Jacobus Van Cortlandfs house on the plain, called " Lower Cortlandts." Tlie former was also called " Coitlandt's white-house " sometimes. It was burned about 1826, and the present residence of Waldo Hutchius was erected on its site. BRIDGE. 753 During the protracted struggle the Yonkers was the scene of constant military activity. Numerous unsuccessful attempts were made bv the Americans to recapture the posts on Tippctt's and Tetard's Hills, and plans of winter attacks across the frozen Har- lem and Spuyten Duyvil were often laid and foiled. The rangers of Simcoe and De Lancey, the yagers of Von Wurnib and the chasseurs of Enimerick were often met and engaged by troops of American Light Horse, under the fiery Colonel Armand and other dashing leaders, on the high-roads and by-ways of the Yonkers plantation. It was also the scene of ceaseless ravages by those irregular bands, known as "Cowboys" and "Skinners." Most of the inhabit- ants went into exile, and were refugees within either the American or British lines. Their homes were desolated, their buildings, fences and orchards de- stroyed. The Tippetts were mainly Tories. In 1776, General George Clinton arrested Gilbert Tippett for " practices and declarations inimical to American liberty." Colonel James De Lancey had married a cousin, Martha Tippett. The Warners, Hadleys, Valentines, Bettses, Corsas, Posts and other old resi- dents were nearly all stanch Whigs, and supplied some of the ablest guides and minute-men of the Revolution. The Siege of Fort Ixdepexdexce. — In .January, 1777, General Heath made a movement against the British outposts at King's Bridge. ^ His forces were chiefly Connecticut volunteers and Dutchess County militia. They moved down on the night of the 17th, in three divisions — the right, under General Lincoln, from Tarrytown by the old Albany road, to the heights above Colonel Van Cortlandt's ; the centre, under General Scott, from below White Plains to the rear of Valentine's house, ^ on the Boston road; and the left, under Generals Wooster and Parsons, from New Rochelle and East Chester to Williams' on the east side of the Bronx above the bridge. The three divisions arrived simultaneously at the enemy's outposts just before sunrise on the 18th. Gen- eral Lincoln surprised the guard above Van Cort- landt's, capturing arms, equipage, etc. Heath moving with the centre, as it ai)proached Valentine's house, ordered its cannonade by Cajjtain Bryant in case of resistance from the guard quartered there, and sent two hundred and fifty men at double-quick to the right into the hollow between the house and Fort Independence- to cut off the guard. Just then two British light horsemen, reconnoitering out the Boston road, came unexpectedly on the head of Wooster's column where the road descends to Williams' bridge. Before they could turn, a field-piece dismounted one, who was taken prisoner, while the other galloped back crying " The rebels ! the rebels ! " which set all * The follow ing acconnt of the movement is condensed from Heath's and contem|iorary British reports. ■•Now and for nearly » century past the Vurian homestead, an ancient stone house on the nortlierly side of the road. 754 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. outguards and inckets running to the fort, leaving arms, blankets, provisions, tools, etc., behind. Those fleeing from Valentine's and the Negro Fort were fired on and one captured. The American left and centre were then moved into the hollow between Valentine's and Fort Independence, and the surren- der of the latter was demanded and refused. The garrison consisted of a body of Hessians and Colonel Rogers' rangers. Heath sent a detachment with two field-pieces southward to the brow of the hill over, looking the Free Bridge, ' and opened fire on a bat. talion of Hessians drawn up across the Harlem, back of Hyatt's tavern. The enemy settled down as the shot passed them, and one piece being moved lower down, they retired rapidly behind their redoubt, -' receiving a shot as they were turning the point. The enemy now opened on Heath's artillerymen from guns he had not suspected to be in the redoubt, and the men hastily drew their pieces back, receiving sev- eral shots before they reached the top of the hill. The success of this movement on the British out- posts flew through the country and was magnified into the reduction and capture of Fort Independence and its garrison. Washington communicated this report to Congress before receiving ofiicial accounts, causing a double disappointment when the facts were known, The Tory press in New York City reported it as an attack on Fort Independence by a large body of rebels, who were "bravely repulsed." On the 19th the enemy oi)ened fire from the fort, and killed one American. Heath determined to cut off the British battalion at Hyatt's by passing one thousand men overSpuyten Duyvil Creek on the ice. It was very cold. The men were detached and gath- ered at Spuyte^ Duyvil Ridge for the attack, but before morning the weather had so moderated that it was deemed too hazardous to make the attem])t. There was cannonading on both sides on the 20th, and the enemy on the island were thrown into much confusion. Heath observing that the enemy, when fired at across the Harlem, found shelter behind the hill at Hyatt's, had a field-piece hauled up to the brow of Tippett's Hill, and opened fire on both their front and rear on the afternoon of the 21st. Some of the enemy found shelter in their redoubt, others under the banks ; some lay flat on the ground and some betook themselves to the cellars, so that pres- ently there was no object for the gunners. A smart skirmish occurred at Fort Independence on the 22d. To keep up the appearance of serious designs upon the fort. Heath ordered fascines, etc., to be made, and sent for a brass twenty-four pounder and a howitzer from New Castle. Another skirmish took place near the south side of the fort on the 23d, just before dusk, in which the Americans had an ensign and private ' Probably to a point on the old Tetard farm, now Claflin's land. -the fort on (he liill at noitherly end of Manhattan Island, over- looking the King s and Flee lii iilges, — originally built by Americans and called by the British " Fort Prince Charles." killed, and five men wounded. On the 24th a severe storm began; Lincoln's division had to quit their huts in the woods back of Colonel Van Cort- landt's, and move back, some even to Dobbs Ferry, to find shelter. A freshet in the Bronx caused the water to run over Williams' bridge. Early on the 25th, the enemy sallied from Fort Independence towards De Lancey's jMills, surprised and routed the guard, wounding several and causing a regiment to quit its quarters. By British accounts they also took one piece of cannon. About ten o'clock they made a sally out the Boston road in force, drove the guards from Negro Fort and Valentine's house, and pushed on so impetuously, keeping up a brisk fire, that the retreating guards threw themselves into the old American redoubt ' overlooking Williams' bridge. The enemy thereupon lined a strong stone wall a few rods distant to the sruthwest. Two regiments of militia were at once formed in the road near Wil- liams' house, across the Bronx, and were sent by Gen- eral Heath, in support of Captain Bryant with his piece, across the submerged bridge. When nearly up the hill on the Boston road, Bryant unlimbered to prevent his horses being shot, and the men took the drag-ropes ; but the steepness of the ascent required the dragging of the piece almost within pistol-shot before it could be depressed enough to bear on the enemy. Its first shot opened a breach in the wall four or five feet wide, the next made another opening, whereupon the enemy fled back to Fort In- dependence with the greatest precipitation. The Americans had two killed and a number wounded. On the 27th the brass twenty-four pounder and the howitzer arrived and opened on the fort. The former sprung her carriage after the third discharge. There were no live shells for the howitzer. No regular cannonade of the fort was, in fact, ever contemplated. Attempts were made to draw the enemy out of the fort. A detachment was sent to Morrisania to light numerous fires at night ; and, to induce the enemy to suppose the Americans were collecting there with designs of crossing to New York at or near Harlem, large boats were brought forward on carriages. The British garrison on Montressor's (Randall's) Island, alarn:ed at this, set fire to the buildings and fled to New York. ' A brigade of the enemy moved up to Fort Washington and a detachment was sent for from Rhode Island. On the 29th a severe snow-storm came on. Gens. Lincoln, Wooster, Scott and Tenbroeck were unani- mous that the troops ought to move back where they could be i)rotected from the inclement weather, espe- cially as they had no artillery with which to take the 3 This old Kevolutionary work may still be traced on the hill north, west from the bridge. It is semicircular in form and was laid out by Heath in the fall of ITVr,. ^By Tory accounts the "rebels" went over to Montressor's Island and "burnt Colonel Montressor's house to the ground, and ravaged what- ever they could meet with " on this occasion. I I i RESiL)£i\CE OF N. P. BAILEY, FORDHAM-ON-HARLEM. N. Y. KING'S BRIDGE. 755 fort, and were opposed to any idea of assault or storm with militia. Accordingly, after dusk, the American ! forces retired northward and eastward in good order to their former stations, and the siege of Fort Indepen- | dence was abandoned. The boldness of these opera- | tions, by raw militia, and for so long a period, in face | of the strong force of British and German veterans in New York, speak volumes for the spirit of our grandsires in their determined contest for indepen- dence. The Massacre of the Stockbkidge Ixoians. — During the summer of 1778 the British light troops, which were encamped about King's Bridge, had fre- quent skirmishes with the American light troops on the highways and by-roads of the old Yonkers. On the 20th of August, when jnitrolling out the old "Mile Square Road," Lieutenant-Colonel Emmerick was attacked and compelled to return to his camp at King's Bridge. A few days later a small body of American light troops and Indians, under Colonel Gist, which had taken part in this encounter, was posted in several detachments on the heights com- manding the old road, one body on each side of the road, just north of its crossing over a small stream be- yond the present Woodlawn Heights, and a third about three hundred yards west of the road, on Devoe's farm, opposite to Woodlawn Heights. Between the last party and the road were scattered about sixty Stockbridge Indians, under their chief, Nimham, who had been in England. Lieutenant-colonel Simcoe, of the Queen's Rangers, learned, through his spies, that the Indians were highly elated at Emmerick's retreat and supposed that they had driven the whole force of light troops at King's Bridge. He took measures to increase this belief and meantime planned to ambus- cade and capture their whole force. His idea was, as the enemy came down the "Mile Square Road," to advance past his flanks. This movement would be perfectly concealed by the fall of the ground to the right {i.e., down the slope in Woodlawn Heights, to- wards the stream at Second Street) and by the woods on the left {i.e., Van Cortlandt's woods, bordering the road and " Lover's Lane," extending north from the road opposite Fourth Street). On the morning of August 81st the Queen's Ran- gers, under Simcoe, the chasseurs, under Emmerick; and De Lancey's Second Battalion and the Legion Dra- goons, under Lieutenant-colonel Tarleton, marched out the " Mile Square Road," reaching the present Woodlawn Heights about ten o'clock. The rangers and dragoons were posted on the right (east of Second Street and about opposite to First Avenue). Emmer- ick's instructions were to take a position on the left, in Van Cortlandt's woods, near Frederick Devoe's house, half a mile up the lane. By mistake he took post in the woods near Daniel Devoe's house, which stood on the " Mile Square Road," near the entrance to the lane, and sent a patrol forward on the road. ; Before Simcoe, who was half-way up a tree reconnoit- ' ering, could stop this movement, he saw a flanking party of Americans approach and heard a smart firing by the Indians who had lined the fences alongside the road on Emmerick's left. The rangers under Simcoe moved rapidly up the stream to gain the heights (Husted's), which were occupied by the Americans under Gist and Stewart, and the cavalry under Tarleton advanced directly up the hill to where Emmerick was engaged (between Third and Fourth Avenues). Being unable to pass the fences bordering the road, Tarleton made a cir- cuit to return on the right (coming to the road again about Fifth Avenue). Simcoe, hearing of Tarleton's difficulty, left the remainder of his corps under Major Ross, and breaking from the rangers with the grena- dier company, arrived unperceived (about oj)posite the end of Sixth Avenue) close upon the left flank of the Indians, who were intent upon the attack of Em- merick and Tarleton. With a yell the Indians fired on the grenadier company, wounding Simcoe and four of his men; but being outnumbered and flanked, the Indians were driven from the fences into the open fields of Daniel Devoe, north of the road. Tar- leton and Emmerick then got among them with the cavalry. The Indians fought most gallantly, pulling several of the cavalry from their horses ; but over- powered by the superior force of the enemy, they had to flee. They were swiftly pursued up over the fields, across the lane, down through Van Cortlandt's woods, over Tippett's Brook into the woods on the ridge be- yond, where a few survivors found concealment among the rocks and bushes, and thus escaped. Nearly forty were killed or desperately wounded, in- cluding the old chief Nimham and his son. The former called out to his people to fly, "that he was old and would die there." He wounded Simcoe and was killed by Wright, his orderly hussar. Tarleton had a narrow escape in the pursuit down the ridge. In striking at an Indian he lost his balance and fell from his horse, but luckily for him the Indian had no bayonet and had discharged his musket. During the pursuit Simcoe joined the battalion of rangers, seized the heights (Husted's) and captured a captain and several men of the American light troops, but the main body escaped. The bodies of many of the Indians were buried in a small clearing in Van Cort- landt's woods, since known as the " Indian Field." In July, 1781, Wttshington came in force to at- tempt a surprise of the British posts at King's Bridge, expressly to cut off De Lancey's and other light corps ; but without success. Later in the month, accompanied by De Rochambeau, he moved a force of five thousand men down to the heights beyond King's Bridge and reconnoitered the northerly part of Man- hattan island from Tippett's and Tetard's Hills and Fordham Heights. In Sejitember a British force of five thousand men moved out across the bridge to Valentine's Hill, as an escort to the young Prince William Henry. After the bitterly cold winter of 756 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. 1782-83 the British troops were withdrawn from the Yonkers and King's Bridge. The inhabitants began to return to their desolate homes, while the Loyalists crowded into the city. In November, Washington came once more down the old post road, spent the night of the 12th at the Van Cortlandt house, and the next day, amid the acclamations of the people, rode victorious across King's Bridge, over which he had retreated seven years before. Political History. — The area under considera- tion was part of the fief of Colen-donck from 1652 to 1664. After the English conquest in the latter year it belonged to the North Riding of Yorkshire until the erection of Westchester County under the act of October 1, 1691. It was afterwards known as the Yonkers Precinct (except the parts included in the Manor of Phillipsburgh after the erection of the I latter, in 1693). By the act of June 19, 1703, the towns, manors, etc., were authorized to choose super- visors, and each inhabitant of any precinct, being a freeholder, was allowed " to join his vote with the next adjacent town." The freeholders of the Yonkers probably voted for a supervisor with the freeholders of East Chester. They chose their own local officers for the precinct, of whom the following " Collectors for the Yonkers " are known : William Jones, 1708- 1(1; John Barrett, 1713-14; John Heading [Had- den], 1715-16; Mr. George Tippett, 1717; Mr. Joseph Ta^-lor, 1718; Matthias Valentine, 1719; Joseph Hadley, 1720; Moses Taylor, 1721-23; William Jones',y724 ; Moses Taylor, 1725 ; Thomas Sherwood, 1726; Moses Taylor, 1727; Thomas Rich, 1728; Ed- ward Smith, 1729-30; Charles Vincent, 1731-32; i J.icob Ryder, 1733-34 ; Josei)h Taylor, 1736. By the act of November 1 , 1 722, " to increase the num- ber of supervisors for Westchester County," the inhabit- ants of each precinct havingnot lessthan twenty inhab- itants were allowed to choose their own supervisor. The Yonkers was no doubt represented in the board by its own member thereafter ; but by reason of the loss of the records of the precinct and of the board before 1772 their names are not known. On the first Tuesday in April, 1756, the freeholders and inhabit- ants of the Yonkers and Mile Square'^ held a public town-meeting at the house of Edward Stevenson, in the Yonkers, and chose James Corton (Coerten ?) supervisor and pounder : Benjamin Fowler, town clerk; Thomas Sherwood, constable and collector; David Oakley and William Warner, assessors; Ed- ward Weeks, Wm. Crawford, Daniel Devoe, John Ryder, Isaac Odell and Hendrick Post, highway matiters ; Andrew Nodine, Charles Warner, Moses Taller and Isaac Odell, fence and damage viewers.^ 1 It is probable that the Yonkei-s and Mile Square constituteil one pre- cinct under the name of the former. The Manor of Phillipsburgh sur- rounded Mile Square on three sides, and also separated it from the Yon- kers. The inhabitants of the manor dwelling upon the old Mile Square road, between Yonkers and Mile Square, were sometimes described as "of the Yonkers in Phillipsburgh." 2 Bolton's " Westchester County." jThe author must have seen the Commissioners of highways in 1770: James Van Cortlandt and Benjamin Fowler. Supervisors for the Yonkers : Colonel James Van Cortlandt, 1772-76 ; (none during the British occupa- tion); Israel Honeywell, 1784; William Hadley, 1786-87 ; David Hunt, 1787. Constables : Jeremiah Sherwood, 1773 ; Henry Odell, 1775; Thomas Sherwood, 1784. By act of March 7, 1788, a new town was erected, containing part of Phillipsburgh, Mile Square and the old precinct of Yonkers, under the name of Y'onkers. In November, 1872, the supervisors of Westchester County erected a township consisting of all of the town of Yonkers lying south of the south- erly line of the city of Yonkers, to be called King's Bridge. Its first and only annual meeting was held at Temperance Hall, Mosholu, March 25, 1873. On the 1st of January, 1874, King's Bridge was annexed to the city of New York and now forms part of the Twenty-fourth Ward. Church History. — Before 1700 the inhabitants had no place of public worship nearer than East Chester. In 1707 they assembled " sometimes in the house of Joseph Betts, deceased, and sometimes in a barn when empty." About 1724 they had preaching three times a year by the rector from East Chester, and they "began to be in a disposition to build a church." None was erected, however, for more than a century. Those of the Reformed Dutch creed at- tended services at the church of Fordham Manor, erected in 1706. It stood on the northerly side of the road to Fordham Landing, where Moses Devoe's gate- way now is. Upon the organization of the English Church at the Lower Mills those of that faith in the Yonkers attended there. After the Revolution Augustus Van Cortlandt and John Warner were of the first trustees of the new "Yonkers Episcopal Society," formed in 1787, and members of the first vestry of " St. John's Church in the town of Yonkers," on its incorporation, in 1795. Isaac Vermilye, Wil- liam Hadley, William Warner and "Cobus" Dyck- man were trustees of "the Reformed Dutch Church at the Lower Mills in the Manor of Phillipsburgh," in- corporated in 1784. Methodist Episcopal Church Bethel (Mosh- olu). — This was the first religious society to erect a house of worship in the limits of King's Bridge. So early as 1826 a charge existed, having thirty-six white members and one colored, under Samuel W. Fisher, preacher. Meetings were held in an old school-house which stood near AVarner's store, Mosh- olu. In 1828 E. Hebard had the charge. He re- mained during 1828 and organized a class. The suc- ceeding preachers were R. Seaman, 1829-30 ; E. Hebard, 1831-32; E. Smith, 1833-34; Th6mas Evans, 1835. On the 10th of February, 1835, Caleb Van Tassell, James Cole, Jacob Varian, Abraham Wood town-book (now, unfortunately, lost), and extracted therefrom the ac- count of the meeting of 17.">G. KING'S BRIDGE. 757 and John C. Lawrence were chosen trustees to build a church and February Hth Caleb Van Tassell and Jacob H. Varian made and filed a certificate of incor- poration as "Trustees of Methodist Church Bethel" in the town of Yonkers. A frame building was erected on the westerly side of the Albany post road and is yet standing, though disused for several years. Its pastors have been E. Oldrin, I. D. Bangs and Thonuis Barch (superannuated), 183G-37; John Davies, Salmon C. Perry and Barch, 1838 ; Henry Hatfield, Perry and Barch, 1839 ; Barch and Daniel I. Wright, 1840 ; Daniel I. Wright and Humi)hrey Humphreys, 1841 ; John A. Silleck and Humphreys 1842 ; Silleck and Fred'k W. Seger, 1843 ; John C[ Green and Mr. Barch, 1844-45; Charles C. Keyes, 184(>-47 ; S. C. Perry, 1848-49; Paul R. Brown, 1850-51 ; Philip L. Hoyt, 1852; Richard Wheatly, 1853-54 ; Noble Lovett and Thos. Bainbridge, 1855 ; O. E. Brown and Bainbridge, 1850; A. B. Davis, 1857-58; R. H. Kelly, 1859-60; Wm. F. Browning and A. B. Brown, 18G1 ; J. G. Shrive, 18()2-63; W. H. Smith, 18<)4; W. H. Smith, 1865; A. Os- trander, 1866-(J7 ; A. C. Gallahue, 1868; W. M. Henry, 1869 ; A. Ostrander, 1870 ; Wm. Plested; 1871 ; W. Tarleton, 1872; H. Croft, 1873; and Cyrus Nixon, 1874-75. Since that date the congregation has worshipped at King's Bridge. Chukch of the Mediator (King's Bridge). — Formed at meeting held August 15, 1855, pursuant to notice given by the rector of St. John's Church, Yonkers, "who presided. Certificate recorded Novem- ber 17, 1856. Name adopted " The Church of the Mediator, Yonkers." Abraham Valentine and James R. Whiting were elected wardens, and Thomas J. De Lancey, William 0. Giles, John C. Sidney, Russell Smith, Joseph H. Godwin, T. Bailey Myers, Daniel Valentine and David B. Cox, vestrymen. Certificate executed by Rev. A. B. Carter, A. Van Corllandt and AVilliam 0. Giles. The church, a frame structure, was erected on land presented by James R. AV'hitiug at a cost of five thousand dollars, and the rectory on ad- joining land soon afterwards. The church was con- secrated by Bishop Horatio Potter November 6, 1864. The officiating clergyman in 1857 was Rev. T- James Brown, of the island of Jamaica. The rectors have been Rev. Cornelius W. Bolton, June, 1858, to May, 1859,; Rev. Leigh Richmond Dickinson, June, 1859. to June, 1866; and Rev. William T. Wilson, since October, I8()6. RiVEUDALE Preskyteriax Church. — Formed at a meeting held Wednesday, 24th June, 1863, Isaac G. Johnson and Edwin P. Gibson presiding. The first trustees chosen were Samuel N. Dodge, Robert Colgate, J. Joseph Eagleton, John ^lott, James Scrymser, Isaac G. Johnson, William E. Dodge, Jr., Warren B. Sage and David B. Kellogg. Certificate of incorporation recorded July 14, 1863. The church building, of stone, was completed and dedicated Octo- ber 11, 1863. Cost, about five thousand dollars. The I stone parsonage adjoining was built soon after. The original membership was fifteen and the first elders were John Mott and Warren B. Sage. The pastors have been : George M. Boy n ton, October 28, ]8(;3, to June, 1867 ; Henry H. Stebbins, August 25, 1867, to December 28, 1873, Charles H. Burr, March 5, 1874 to July 28, 1878 ; William R. Lord, April 30, 1879, to Novendjer20, 1881 ; Ira S. Dodd, April L"), 1883, the ; present pastor. Entire membership, one hundred and twenty-five. Christ Church (Riverdale). — Formed at a meet- ing held September 10, 1866 ; Rev. E. M. Peck, chair- man. Henry L. Stone and Newton Carpenter were elected wardens, and Samuel I). Babcock, George W. Knowlton, Thompson N. HoUistcr, Frederick Good- ridge, Martin Bates, William W. Thompson, William H. Appleton and Henry F. Spaulding, vestrymen. Certificate by E. M. Peck, Percy R. Pyneand Charles H. P. Babcock, recorded September 15, 1866. Cor- porate name, "The Rector, Church Wardens and Ves- trymen of Christ Church, Riverdale." The corner- stone of the church was laid in 1865. It is built of granitic gneiss and is cruciform. Rev. E. M. Peck acted as rector until the Rev. George D. Wildes, D.D., present rector, assumed charge, in 1868. The rectory adjoining the church is a frame building. There are some beautiful memorial windows in the church, notably one recently inserted by Percy R. Pyne at a cost of twenty-five thousand francs. It is a master- piece of the French school by E. S. Oudinot and L. O. Merson, of Paris, representing the supper at Enimaus. Edge Hill Chapel (Spuyten Duyvil). — Erected in 1869, on land leased by Isaac O. Johnson at a nominal rent. Services are conducted every Sunday evening by the pastor of Riverdale Presbyterian Church. W<)<)DL.A.\vx Methodist Etiscopal CHtRCH (Woodlawn Heights). — Organized in 1875. Building erected on lots donated by E. K. AVillard ; completed and dedicated April, 1876, by Bishop Janes. Pas- tors: D. W. C. Van Gaasbeek, 1875-76; Aaron Coons, 1876-79; Gustave Laws, 1880-81 ; J. O. Kern, 1881, present incumbent. Membership, thirty-nine. St. Stephen's Methodist Episcopal Church (King's Bridge). — Organized by trustees of the Meth- odist Episcopal Church Bethel (Mosholu) in 1875. Church completed and dedicated May 14, 1876. Pas- tors: D. W. C. Van Gaasbeek, 1875-76 ; Aaron Coons, 1876-79; David Tasker, 1879-80; S. Lowther, 1880-82; R. H. Kelly, 1882-83; Isaac H. Lent, present incum- bent. Membership, forty-seven. St. John's Church (King's Bridge). — Built under the direction of the Rev. Henry A. Brann, D.D., and dedicated December 3, 1880, by Cardinal McCloskey. Since its erection Dr. Brann has been aided in attend- I ing to the congregation by the Revs. Fr. Micena, Dr. Shrader, D. McCormick and William Fry, and the present as.sistant is Rev. Father O'Neill. Attached 758 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. to the church are the St. John's Benevolent Society and St. Patrick's Temperance Society. The congre- gation numbers about five hundred souls and is con- nected with St. Elizabeth's Church, Fort Washington, where Dr. Brann resides. VILLAGES. King's Bridge. — The village of this name sprang up about thirty-five years ago, upon the ancient "island or hummock" of Paparinamin, from which it has since overspread the site of the old village of Fordham and the hillside beyond. Paparinamin was given, in 1668, by Eiias Doughty to George Tippett. Alter his death, in 1675, Archer laid claim to it ; but> exacting as a recognition of his manorial rights the annual payment of a " flat capon " every New Year's day, he released the tract to Secretary Matthias Nicoll. Two years later Tippett's widow, then wife of Lewis Vitrey, reconveyed the island to Doughty, who, in turn, transferred it to the secretary. Thus the title to MACOMB'S DAM, HARLEM RIVER, 1S.50. this tract vested in the colonial government, which had already assigned its use to Ferryman Verveelen. In 1693 it was included in the grant of the Manor of Phillipsburgh, of which it remained a part until for- feited by the attainder of Colonel Phillipse, in 1779. It was sold by the Commissioners of Forfeiture (deed July 30, 1785) to Joseph Crook, inn-keeper, Daniel Barkins and Abraham Lent, Jr., of Dutchess County, in joint tenancy. Medcef Eden, brewer, John Ram- sey and Alexander von Pfister, merchants, subse- quently owned it in whole or part ; also, Daniel Hal- sey, inn-keeper, who kept the old tavern upon it be- tween 1789 and 1793. It was purchased, 1797-99, from Von Pfister and Joseph Eden by Alexander Macomb, a wealthy merchant of New York.^ During the next five years Macomb purchased from Isaac Yermilye, John De Lancey, Isaac, John and I WLo purchased from the State in 1791 more than tlireo million five huixlred thousand acres in Nortliern New York, at Sd. per acre. The Adirondack Mountains were long known as " Maeomb's Mountains." Matthias Valentine, Andrew Corsaand Augustus Van Cortlandt adjoining parcels, mostly salt meadow, mak- ing up nearly one hundred acres, bounded north by Van Cortlandt, east by the Albany road, south by the Harlem and Spuyten Duyvil, and west by Tippett's Brook. Having obtained from the mayor, etc., of New York, in December, 1800, a water grant extend- ing across the creek, just east of the King's Bridge (which reserved, however, a passage-way fifteen ieet wide for small boats and craft), Macomb erected a four-story frame grist-mill extending out over the creek. Its power was supplied by the alternate ebb and flow of the tide against its under-shot wheel. Macomb's extensive real estate ventures proving dis- astrous, Paparinamin and the mill were sold under foreclosure in 1810, and purchased by his son Robert. By an act of 1813 the latter was authorized to con- struct a dam across the Harlem from Bussing's to Devoe's Point, and to use the water for milling pur- poses, and erected at much expense the causeway and bridge known as " Macomb's Dam." Its gates admitted the flood tide from the East River, but obstructed its ebb, thus converting the Upper Harlem into a mill-pond, having its outlets under- neath the old mill and through a raceway made on the Westchester side into Spuyten Duyvil Creek at low tide. The race sup- j)lied power to a marble-sawing mill which stood on a quay between it and the creek, and of which Perkins Nicolls was proprie- tor. Robert Macomb becoming involved, the property was sold by the sheriff in 1818. Ten years later it was possessed by the " New York Hydraulic Manufacturing and Bridge Company," by which an elab- orate plan was put forth for mill-seats and a manufacturing village, based on a report of Professor James Renwick, of Columbia College, approved by Colonel Totten and General Macomb, chief engineers United States army. The enterprise proved abortive.- The old grist- mill ' stood idle during many years, and at length was made useless by the removal of Macomb's Dam. In 1830 Mary C. P. Macomb, the wife of Robert, acquired the Paparinamin tract, and during many years uuide the old stone tavern her home, ex- ercising therein a generous hospitality, of which Edgar Allen Poe was a frequent recipient. In 1847 Mrs. Macomb laid out the estate into streets and plots, which she afterwards disposed of. Several houses were erected, stores and shops were opened, a church 2 It was propossd, in an elaborate prospectus, to dam the Yonkers Riv- er (Tippett's Brook) near its mouth, and have gates opening down-stream only. The bed of the stream and the salt meadows through which it flowed were to form a reservoir for tail-water, which would empty itself into Spuyten Duyvil Creek at low tide. Fourteen mill-seats, each fifty by one hundred feet, bordered the race-ways, and an aggregate of at least two hundred and thirty-four horse-power was assured for them. 3 It fell down about 1836. I I KING'S BRIDGE. 759 built and a centre of population established, which has grown to several hundreds. There are now three churches, a grauiuiar school, ])olice station, numerous stores, shops, saloons and dwellings. Among the well-known residents are Joseph H. Godwin,' William G. Ackerman, William O. Giles, George Moller, Wil- liam A. Yarian, M.D., Benjamin T. Sealey, William H. Geer, John Parsons, M.D., Rev. William T. Wil- son and others. Spvytex Duyvil. — A village (and until recently a post office) located on the southerly end of Spuyten Duyvil Xeck. The land was owned . by George Tip- pett, who died in 1761. He devised it in several parcels to his children and grandchildren. Soon af- ter the Revolution it belonged to Samuel Berrien, who had married Dorcas Tippett, daughter of George.'- He sold to Abraham Berrien, a nephew^, in whose family it continued until about 1850.- In 1852 the tract was in three farms, which were purchased that year and next by Elias Johnson, David B. Cox and Joseph W. Fuller, of Troy, X. Y. They had surveys and plans made for a village to be called Fort Inde- pendence,' but which was changed to Spuyten Duyvil. Streets were opened and several houses erected on the hill, and a foundry was established at its base. The latter was afterwards bought and extended into a rolling-mill by Jervis Langdon, who was succeeded by the Langdon Rolling-Mill Company. The Spuy- ten Duyvil Rolling-Mill Company, organized in 1867, next owned this property. A malleable iron foundry was established on adjoining premises by Isaac G. .Johnson and now employs several hundred hands. There are about thirty private dwellings on the ele- vate4, Journal Van New Ni-therhind. 3 Uall Doca., iii. lOo, v. 314. «1 Broadhead, 296. f N. V. Col. Docs., xiii. ii. « Riker and X. Y. Col. Dors., vol. xi. l(i-2. of learning and refinement, for he had in his library books written in several languages, used silver on his table and had napkins and table-cloths, and as many as six linen shirts.^ The books were, many of them, religious. He undoubtedly believed that cleanliness and godliness were twin sisters. Bronx was hardly settled in his new quarters at Emmaus, as he piously termed it, before an Indian war broke out. The young Weckquacsgeek who had witnessed the killing of his uncle by Minuit's servants had attained manhood. Claes Sinits, a harmless Dutchman, had built a small house ou the East River neiir Harlem, on the Manhattan side, now One Hun- dred and Twenty-third Street, near the river. He was a wheelwright by trade. The young savage came one day and offered to barter some beaver skins for duffels, and while Smits was stooping over the chest in which he kept the goods the Indian killed him with an axe, i)lundered the house and escaped with his booty into Westchester. COPY PROM TRACING OF BROUCKSLAND. jS&v OfflCE SECYOF STATE ALBANY "^^K^ VCl.l.lAW PAPERS P.I7. /.a^ Governor Kieft demanded satisfaction from the tribe ; the sachem refused to give him up and sol- diers were sent to arrest him, but they failed to do so.* The prudent burghers of New Amsterdam were op- posed to a war, and the director very wisely saw that if one was begun he would have to bear the blame. He therefore sought counsel of the community, and the twelve men, from whom, by the charter of the company, he was directed to ask advice agreed that Smits' murder should be avenged, but they thought that " God and the opportunity" should be taken into consideration and that the director should make the necessary preparations. They advised that trade and intercourse with the savages should in the mean- time be maintained and no hostile measures should be adopted against any one but the murderer until the hunting season was ended, and then it would be proper to send out two parties, one from the Sound or East River side and the other from the Hudson ' N. T. Col. Docs., xi. 102. 31 Broadliead, 316, "Doc. History N. Y.," iv. 8, 9. Y70 HISTOKi: OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. River side to surprise them. It was also suggested by the twelve men that the director should " lead the van," but that in the meantime a shallop should be three times sent to demand the murderer.^ Kieft would not listen to this wise counsel ; by private col- loquy with each of the twelve he tried to advise them to sanction a war, but they voted to await the arrival of the next ship from Fatherland.^ A treaty of peace was finally made with the Indians at the house of Jonas Bronx's^ in 1642, and in 1643 Jonas Bronx, probably the first white settler in Westchester town, died at his home, and his estate was administered upon by friends at Harlem*. Everardus Bogardus, the Dutch minister in New Amsterdam (husband of the far-famed Anneke Jans) and Jochim Petersen Keyser, or Kuyter, of Harlem, made up the inventory of his estate. His widow was present, a-s was also his son, Peter Bronx, and from him are descended a numerous family settled at Al- bany since that time.^ About the time of Bronx's death some persons from New England settled on what is now known as Throgg's Neck or Throgg's Point, the extreme eastern part of the township. This locality was called by the Dutch Vreedelant, or the " free land," owing to the fact that New Englanders, to escape intolerance in their own settlements, persecution for witchcraft, Quakerism and other offenses came to this region to enjoy civil and religious liberty, guaranteed to all persons who chose to come under the dominion of the Dutch West India Company. In the permission to settle there given by Director Kieft to John Tlirock- morton and his associates the territory is described as along the East River of New Netherlaud, " being a piece of land surrounded on one side by a little river and on the other side by a great kill, which river and kill on high water running to meet each other." This description covers the present Throgg's Neck or everything east of Westchester Creek and west of East Chester Bay. Throckmorton and his associates, however, had but a short enjoyment of >1 Broadhead, .318, "Doc. History," t. 326, 329. 2 1 Broadhead, 319. ^ 1 Broadhead, 330. ■•Biker's "History of Harlem," loS-.W ; vol. xi., N. Y. Col. Docs., 44. ^Tuentje or Turnje Juriansen was Bronx's widow. Her name would hardly be recognized to day as the synonym of Antonia Slagboom; but Turnje is the Dutch nickname fur .\ntonia, and as her father (Slagboum) was baptized Jurian, she was Turii.je, the daughter of Jurian, and so called, though to-day she would be Mrs. Bronx. After Bronx's death she married Arendt Van Corlaer, the sherifl' of Rensselaerwick, and on July 10, 1051 , Van Corlaer sold Bronx's land to Jacob Jans Stoll. In 1C62, Matthias de Vos, as attorney for Geertruit Andries, the widow of Van Stoll, conveyed it to Geertrieu Hendrick, the widow of one Andries Hoppen, and she, on the same day, with the consent of her husband, Dirck Gerritts Van Tright, sold to Harmann Smeeman, who, on the 22d of October, sold the same to Samuel Edsall, a beaver-niaker, of New York City, who held it until 1668-70. Edsall was a useful man. In the ex- ercise of his business he had considerable intercourse with the Indians, and learned their language. We find him on several occasions, at Fort Amsterdam and elsewhere, acting as an interpreter. He removed from Bronx land and finally settled in New Jersey. their new homes. The treaty of peace signed at Bronx's house was of no avail. The Indians were committing depredations, and Director Kieft, with the assistance of a council of only eight men, this time determined on an Indian war. As large a force as the good burghers of New Amsterdam could aflFord to pay for was promptly enlisted, good and fitting ordinances against taverning and all other irregularities were " ordained," and, possibly to prevent such worldly practices, a week's preaching was ordered. Captain John Underbill, a hero of the Pequod War, was placed in command of the expedition. Either by reason of the delay in recruiting or the week's preaching, or some other misfortune not men- tioned in the documents of that date, th e troops took the field too late, and were unable to repel au attack made by the Weckquaesgeeks, who, at Pelham Neck, or, as it was then known, Aiinie's Hoeck, murdered the celebrated refugee Ann Hutchinson, and de- stroyed houses and cattle. Thence they went to " Vreedelandt," where such of the Throckmorton or Cornell families as were at home were murdered and the barns and houses burned. A boat landing there about that time, some of the women and children fled on board, but eighteen persons were massacred. This raid seems to have extended a consider- able distance. Westchester was laid waste and Long Island was almost cleaned out of inhabitants and f X. Y. Col. Docs., xiti. 6. SN. T. Col. Docs., xiii. 36. 'Mem, Bo. 772 HISTOEY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. tion, provided they be allowed to choose their own officers for the enforcement of laws which may be made for the good of the township. Their petition was granted and on March 16, 1656, they were al- lowed to depart for Vredelandt and also to nominate a double number of officers, subject to the approval of the Director-General and Council. They at once organized and elected Lieutenant Thomas \Yheeleras their magistrate, and his selection received the sanc- tion of the director on the same day. Some of the party, however, were ordered to leave the province unless they gave bail for good behavior.' In 1655 another Indian war broke out. The savages came down the Sound in their canoes as far as Hell Gate, and Peter, the chimney-sweep of Xew Amster- dam, was taken prisoner. Captain Nuton was di- rected to caution the peojjle in the country to keep together and not wander far from the plantations. - The New Englanders settled at Westchester were sus- pected of having entered into a conspiracy with the Indians so as to throw off the Dutch yoke, and they were also in constant correspondence with the English authorities in Connecticut. This settlement was called by the Dutch " O'ostdorp," and the insubordination of its inhabitants was a constant annoyance to Stuy- vesant. The Dutch West India Company also ex- pressed its disapproval of the course the New Eng- landers were pursuing with reference to Ostdorp, or Westchester village, and their wicked attempts to "purloin it." ^ Van Couwenhoven made a report to the Governor and Council that, on the 15th of March, 1664, an In- dian named Hiekemick came to his house and told him that the Esopus and Wappinger Indians were ready for an insurrection, and that the English at Westchester had promised that they would first con- quer Long Island and then the Manhattans, but that the Indians must help them. The Indians said that they were willing, but the thrifty New Englanders asked, "When you have done it, how much land shall we have then?" The land at Esopus wa.s promised if the English would help them kill the Dutch. The .Indians made another visit to Westchester and tried to consummate the bargain, but were answered, " It cannot be done at present, as our Sachem (evidently meaning Lieutenant Wheeler) has made an agree- ment with Stuyvesant for a year." After some un- successful palaver the Indians left, saying, "It is bet- ter to make peace with the Dutch ; the English are only fooling us." But the inhabitants of Westchester did not feel satis- fied under the Dutch rule, and in the following August I of 1664 informed the commissioners of Her Majesty's affairs in New England of their arrest by the Dutch and the hardships they had to endure in the hold of a 1 N. Y. Col. Docs., 67. ^ 2>. Y. Col. Docs., xiii. 43; Laws of Xew Nethcrland, page 198. 3N. Y. rol. Docs., xi. 550. I ■'Idem, 527, 529. 5 Holland Docs., ii. page 219. vessel and in a dungeon at the Manhattoes ; that the sole cause of their arrest was that they opposed the Dutch title to the lands ; that after their release some of their companions were driven away and the residue were enslaved. This was undoubtedly an allusion to the compulsory visit Wheeler and his friends made some years before to New Amsterdam. * But Stuyvesant's contests with and suspicions of the unruly New England settlers at Westchester were soon ended. Charles II., of England, in March, 1664, lib- erally 2>resented to James, Duke of York, the whole colony of New Netherlands, with other possessions which he never owned. In August Colonel Richard NicoUs, with his English squadron and New England soldiers, captured the city of New Amsterdam, and in Se23tember, 1664, we can imagine that Wheeler and his fellow-citizens in Westchester village rejoiced in godly New England style over the downfall of the valiant Dutch Governor, Petrus Stuyvesant, and the accession of James, Duke of York, and his Governor, NicoUs, as lord proprietor of New York and West- chester township. ' FoRDHAM AND THE Ferries. — West of Bronx River are the regions formerly known as the Manors of Fordham and Morrisania and the West Farms Patent, and lately as the townships of West Farms and Morrisania. The early history of Ford- ham and Morrisania is closely allied with that of Harlem, and many of their first settlers came from the latter village. In 1658 the director-general and Council passed an ordinance at Fort Amsterdam for the promotion of neighborly correspondence with the English in the north, and as a practical measure for the closer communication of the two peoples, they au- thorized the establishment of a ferry with a suitable scow near Harlem, besides promising, that a good wagon road should be built from Fort Amsterdam to Harlem by the company's negroes as soon as the population of the latter had increased to twenty or twenty-five families.* The promised ferry and road remained only a pro- ject in the minds of the Dutch authorities, but never- theless many of the Harlem people were attracted to the main land and some cultivated boueries or farms in the neighborhood of Bronxland and Spuyten Duyvil. NicoUs, the new English Governor, a man of enterprise and tact, who paid much attention to developing the settlements and obtaining the good will of the Dutch, in 1666 granted a charter to the inhabitants of Harlem, which, among other things, provided for " a ferry to and from the main which I may redound to their particular benefit," and author- ized them "at their charge to build one or more boats for that purpose fit for the transportation of men, horses and cattle, for which there will be such N. Y. Col. Docs., xiii. 363, 392. ' 2 Bancroft, 69 {Little Brown's ed.). 8 Riker's " History of Harlem " is the source from which most of the information in the following pages is derived. WESTCHESTER. 773 a certain allowance given as shall be adjudged rea- sonable." About this time it was found by the Har- lem people that as there was a convenient fording- place at Spuyten Duyvil, a good road should be made to Harlem and a good ferry established over the river; so, on January 3, 1667, at a meeting of the mayor and magistrates, it was determined that tlie Harlem people should make one-half the road from Harlem to the Manhattans and that Spuyten Duyvil " be stopped up "; that like care be taken for a suit- able ordinary (tavern) for persons coming and going; and the mayor. Captain Delaval, promised the nails and the making of a scow, on condition that the ferryman should repay him when required to do so. Johannes Verveelen agreed to take the ferry and the ordinary for six years. He was duly sworn to provide lodgings, victuals and drink for travelers, but to tap no liquor for the Indians ; he was also allowed to have six extra feet to his lot of hind in Harlem, as he was cramped for room, and must make convenience " for his ordinary." Travel toward Westchester and the eastward gave a new spur and energy to Harlem. Verveelen fitted up his ordinary and provided the boats, and his lusty negro, Matthys, was placed in charge. People enjoyed the hospitality of the inn on their way to and from Broiixside, and their cattle were safely ferried across at the following rates: " For one person, four stivers, silver money; for two, three or four, each three stivers, silver money ; for one beast, one shilling; and for more than one, each ten stivers silver." Riker locates the inn and ferry at the north side of One Hundred and Twenty-third Street, three hundred feet west of First Avenue. It would seem that the worthj' inn-keeper and ferry-master was not always observant of the excise laws. He thought that as he wsis put to some expense pro bono publico in keeping up the ferry, he should not pay the excise fees, and the mayor and alderman tiiouglit there was sufficient equity in his claim, for, on the 3d of July, 1667, an agreement was made between them tiiat he should have the ferry for five years, provided he keep a convenient house and lodging for passengers. He was also given about an acre on Bronxside, and a place to build a house on. At what point this was located the present historian can not decide. At the end of five years the ferry was to be farmed out, but during that time he was to pay nothing for it, and in case the ferry should be let to another, the house was to be valued as it stood, and Verveelen was to be paid for it. Then the rates of ferriage were fixed thus : For every passenger, two pence silver or six pence wampum ; for every ox or cow that shall be brought into the ferry-boat, eight pence, or twenty- four stivers; cattle under a year old, six pence or eighteen stivei-s wampum ; " all cattle that are sivum over " paid but half-price. He was to take from every man " for his meal, eight pence; every man for his lodging, two pence a man ; every man for his horse shall pay four pence for his night's hay or grass, or ' twelve stivers wampum, provided the grass be in fence." Government messages between New York and Connecticut were free. In consideration of his having to build a house on both sides of the ferry, the Governor freed him from paying any excise " for what wine or beer he may retail in the house" for one year from the date of the agreement.' In Octol)er, lOlw, f tovernor Nicolls granted a patent to the inhabitants of Harlem. Thomas Delaval, Daniel Turneur, John Verveelen and others were the first patentees. He also granted to them four lots of land on the mainland numbered one, two, three and four, near Spuyten Duyvil. He also granted to the people of Harlem, Stony Island, or that part of Mor- risania now known as Port Morris.'* The people at Harlem, though they had passed resolutions to stop the passage at Spuyten Duyvil, found that it was no- easy matter to do so. The fence was thrown down and the cattle from the island forded over to the main. The location of this fording-place is at the island in front of the residence of Joseph H. Godwin, at King's Bridge. John Barker from Westchester, in spite of the ferry regulations at Harlem, had swum a large number of horses and cattle across at Spuyten Duyvil. Verveelen, the ferry master, made com- plaint to the Mayor's Court of the city of New York,, and judgment was rendered that Barker pay the ferry master for all horses and cattle which had been "con- veyed by him over the Spuyten Duyvil whilst the ferry has been at Harlem," which money the ferry- master was ordered to apply to the repair ofthe fences- at Spuyten Duyvil. In the meantime John Archer, of Fordham, and the people at Harlem were disputing over the land* and meadows at Spuyten Duyvil.' Like the other large proprietors, he leased his lands in parcels of from twenty to twenty-four acres to such persons as- would clear and cultivate them. The tenants also had a house and lot each in the village, so that in 1668— 69 a goodly number of Harlem people went to reside on Archer's property. The village was lo- cated very near the present settlement of King's Bridge near to the "fording-place" in Spuyten Duyvil Creek, and hence is derived the name of Fordham — ford, a fording place ; ham, a mansion.* But Nicolls had granted the Harlem people four lots on the main- ' Biker's " Harlem," page 2C9. 2X. Y. Col. Docs., vol. xiii. 4-21. 3 Archer had years before bought from the Indians a large tract, now known as King's Bridge, Fordliani, Iligli Bridge and Belmont, and ex- tendingas far north as Williiinis' Bridge. His nationality is disputed. Bol- ton says the family was of English origin. Riker says his name was Jan Arcer, Though full-fledged lord of the Manor of Fordham, Archer still agitated the question of lots one, two, three and four at Spuyten Duyvil, and to quiet all trouble, Governor Lovelace, on November 9, 1672, made the following order : " Whereas the meadow ground or valley by the creek beneath, the town of Fordham, at Spuyten Duyvil, is claimed by someof the inhabitants of New Harlem, but is at so great distance from them and lying unfenced and so near the town of Fordham 1 This latter date was undoubtedly a confirniation of the patent under Colve's short interregnum. — Bolton's "Westchester,*' vol. ii. page 505; Land Papers, Albany, vol. iii. page 127 et supra. that those of Harlem can receive little or no benefit thereby, as the inhabitants of Fordham cannot avoid being daily trespassers there if the property should still continue to Harlem, to prevent all further cavils and contests and also to encourage the new plantation at Fordham, as well as in compensation to those of Harlem for their interest which they shall quit at Spuyten Duyvil," he promised that some convenient spot being found at or near Brouxland, he would grant and confirm the same unto the persons con- cerned, provided it did not greatly prejudice the rest of Bronxland when it should be settled. He referred the matter to Daniel Turneur, David des Marest (Demarest) and John Archer for examination and report. ^ Archer did not live long in harmony with the popu- lation of his manor, and in 1669-70 they forwarded to the Mayor's Court in New York a complaint that he had undertaken to govern them by " rigour and force;" that "he had been at several times the oc- casion of great troubles betwixt the inhabitants of said town ;" and they " humbly desired relief and the protection of said court." Both parties were heard by the court, which ordered Archer "to behave him- self for the future, civilly and quietly, as he will an- swer the same at his peril." But as the Fordham community was evidently difiicult to govern, it was- further ordered that minor causes between them should be decided at Harlem, by the Fordham magis- trates, with the assistance of two of the magistrates- of Harlem, unless the Fordham people would pay the Harlem magistrates for coming to their town, and holding court there. On September 8, 1()71, no less^ than four cases were brought against Archer. David Demarest sued him for mowing grass on his meadow at Fordham; Martin Hadewin, of Fordham, sued him for breaking down his fences ; Marcus de Souchay (now Dissoway), for throwing his furniture out of doors; and Verveelen had a suit against him on gen- eral jirinciples, as it would appear. The cattle were allowed to run at large, each man having his own brand and all herding together, John Tippets, residing near Spuyten Duyvil, had killed some hogs which were not branded, and the constables and overseers of the joint courts of Harlem and Fordham met to determine who owned the hogs. John Archer, as usual, was interested ; he claimed the hogs on behalf of the Duke of York. The Gov- ernor, it^ seems, had once reproved Tippets for hav- ing an unlawful mark for his cattle, which was, to cut their ears so short that " any other marks may be cut off by it." Elizabeth Heddy, Benjamin Palmer and Jan Hendricks proved that Tippets owned a litter of pigs, " the which were gray, red, spotted and white." The result of this important trial is not known, but thereafter the Fordham people were com- pelled to keep their cattle on the main, and the in- 2Riker's "History of Harlem," page 387. WESTCHESTER. 777 stitution of town brauders for cattle was established. Tlie same practice prevailed in Westchester, on the east side of" the township, as much space in the early records is given to the recording of the various brands for cattle, sheep and hogs which each fanner recorded. The manor being established, shortly afterwards (April 2-'), 1073) Governor Lovelace authorized the es- tablishment of a court, to be held there quarterly, and, on the nomination of Archer, appointed John Ryder, steward of the manor, as president of the court, with the constable of the place and one or two of the " discreetest " of the inhabitants as assist- ants. The court had jurisdiction in all matters of debt and trespass between the landlord and his tenants, and between one tenant and another. It was held at Archer's house. About this time Ver- veleen, Archer's enemy, must have been displaced as constable, as we find Richard Cage to have succeeded him. In the mean time, under the English rule, the terri- tory east of the Bronx was in the jurisdiction of the West Riding of Yorkshire, or Long Island, and the people attended the courts there, while the Fordham people had their court at Fordham and Harlem. On December 28, 16G-5, Governor Nicolls informed the inhabitants of Westchester that he would defer the laying out of the town in metes and bounds until they informed him as to every man's estate there, so that the whole could be equally divided into lots in proportion to each man's assessed valuation. Thomas Pell endeavored to prevent the granting of a patent to the people of Westchester, but the lawsuit that he had had a few years before with Cornell, relative to his grant, wsis treated by Nicolls as a good precedent. About the same time a delegation went from West- chester to an interview with the Governor's secretary about the division of the land, and the Governor di- rected that they should divide the meadows as they plejised, but observing the order made by Mr. Dela- val and Mr. Hubbard. They were to have as much of Mrs. Bridge's meadows as Delaval and Hubbard ordered, but they were not to meddle with the forty- two acres, by Rattlesnake Brook, claimed by the Ten Farms (East Chester) which were to remain to the use of the families settled there, and to be concluded thereby and bounded by the brook. Every one hun- dredth estate was to have six acres, and every two hundredth estate eight acres of good meadow land lying most convenient for each lot, but no further di- vision was to be made, the remainder of the land be- ing left in common for the encouragement of future settlers. The meadow ground of the Ten Farms was between Hutchinson's River and Rattlesnake Brook, and the reservations made as to territory included what is north of the East Chester line. On March 1, 1664-65, a meeting of deputies was held at Hemp- stead, Long Island, at which Westchester County was represented by Edward Jessop and John Quimby, and the former served on the Committee of Ditferencea between the towns." The Westchester PATEXT.~On February 13, 1667, Governor XicoUs, evidently perceiving the folly of having Westchester a portion of the Long Island jurisdiction, granted to the people the first patent of Westchester. The boundaries were, on the west the Bronx River, on the south the Sound or East River, on the east Ann's Hook or Pelham Neck, and on the north " into the woods without lim- itation for range of cattle." The grantees were John Quimby, John Ferris, Nicholas Bailey, William Bettsand Edward Walters, for and in behalf ofthem- ! selves and their associates and the freeholders and ] inhabitants within the town of Westchester. He also gave them all the rights and privileges of a township, I and provided that the place should be called West- I Chester.^ I On November 3, 1667, Westchester was in arrears for her share of the taxes levied for building a ses- sions-house for the riding. William Hallett, the con- tractor for building the court-house, was appointed collector, and the town was ordered to pay its proportion in coin or in default to be fined five pounds. During the brief restoration of the Dutch, begin- ning with July 30, 1673, they made new laws and granted new ground briefs or patents to those who swore allegiance to their government. Westchester township, both east and west of the Bronx, was com- pelled to bow to Governor Colve. On August 13, 1673, he and his Council summoned Oostdorp, or Westchester, to send their deputies to Fort William Hendrick, together with their constables, staves and English flags, and they would, if circumstances per- mitted, be furnished with the Prince's colors in place ! of the British ensigns. On August 21st the deputies delivered their credentials ' and oflered to submit to ^ the Dutch, and to report to the Council the names of [ the persons whom they had nominated as magis- trates. The next day they delivered up the flag and the constables' staves, and having joined in a respectful j petition of submission, they were granted the same j rights and privileges as the Dutch inhabitants, and ; pardoned for their past errors in coquetting with the English, with the warning however, that in future they should demean themselves as loyal subjects. On August 30th the Council appointed as schepens or 1 It miiAt be reinenibereil that east of the BroDX, Westchester be- longed to the Long IshtuJ juriB therefore appointed to take charge of the two-thirds I of the estate which belonged to the government and r, John Lawrence, Stephanus Van Cortlandt and !■ Walter Webley, the nephew, were appointed ad- ir ministrators of Richard's one-third for the benefit of le the infant Lewis. ^ The uncle Lewis, however, with i all the shrewdness of a Quaker and the tact of an old s. soldier, for a time kept in hiding, * but after arranging h. in some way with the government, was finally made 10 administrator of his brother's estate and afterwards a- guardian of the person and estate of his infant 3, nephew. ' He must have finally made a good ira- or pression upon Governor Colve, for he was granted the [5, entire estate, buildings and materials thereon, on a ii- valuation to be made by impartial appraisers for the et- benefitoftheminorchild;*butColve,likeatruesoldier, who respected the rights of the commissariat first ii- and the vanquished afterwards, " appropriated" (due rij, regard being had of course to the infant's interests) all ([• the fat cnttle, such as oxen, cows and hogs. Lewis, the III: elder, thus became possessed of Bronxland. Dl, It seems that, this matter being settled, he returned ill.' to B;irbadoes for the purpose of closing up his busi- fj( ness on that island, but left his nephew, Webley, in " 1 N. Y. Col. Docs., vol. ii. 599. 2 Mem, filT. 3 Idem, 651. * Idem, fi84. ' Idem, Ki'i. « Idem, G.J7. charge of the estate in New York." The young ward's movable property had been scattered far and wide,^' but Webley attended to getting things togeth- er. Colonel IMorris returned to New York in 1675, and in 1676, the English having in the mean time re- captured the province, G jvernor Andros granted to Lewis, the elder, a confirmatory i)atent of Bronxland and some "addicional lands" adjacent thereto, not included in any patent. Under this grant Colonel Morris became seized of a tract of land containing some nineteen hundred acres. It was bounded on the north by a line which, if extended east from Judge Smith's tavern, on Central Avenue, to the road south of the Home for Incurables, would be the north line; on the south and southeast, the Harlem River; on the west, Cromwell Creek ; and on the east, the Hunt and Richardson patent, mentioned elsewhere. By reference to the map it will be seen that this pat- ent covered more than the original grant to Jonas Bronck. Colonel Lewis Morris, the elder, settled and resided on this estate until the time of his death." He seems to have been a friend of Governor Andros, having entertained him at his house and also accom- panied him on the special expedition when Andros visited Carteret to arrange about the settlement of the government in New Jersey after the accession of James, Duke of York, to the throne of England." He was a sympathizer with the government, and against Leisler during the Leisler Rebellion, and his house at Morrisania was used as the exchange for the gov- ernmental secret correspondence rendered necessary at that time. On one occasion the government post-man, who had stopped at Morris' house, was captured about a quarter of a mile from it by some of Leisler's men, and the mail taken from him and examined by the insurrectionists.'* Before coming to America, Colonel Morris commanded a troop of horse in Cromwell's army, and on the Restoration went to Barbadoes. While there he participated in some of the English campaigns against other islands, and received the com- mission of colonel. He was also a member of Gov- ernor Dongan's Council from 1683 to 1686, and died in 1691. His will is of record in New York County. Lewis, the nephew, had in the mean time grown to man's estate and succeeded his uncle as heir-at-law, and next of kin, as well as under his uncle's will. I On the 6th day of May, 1697, Governor Benjamin Fletcher confirmed to him the grant made by his predecessor, Andros, to his uncle and also erected the lands into a lordship or manor by the name and title of the Lordship or Manor of Morrisania, in the county of Westchester. The patent grants the same I Idem, 6.37. f Idrm, 63!i. " Idem, 634. I" Book of Pateiita, vol. iv. paiie 99. " For bonnilaries of this patent, see maji Httaclied to this arti< K'. X. Y. Col. Docs., vol. ii. ptige 682. I'X. Y. Col. Docs., vol. xiii. i'«ge 542. » K. Y. Col. Docs., iii. 6S2. 780 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. lands as those mentioned in the earlier patent, to the uncle Lewis. The grantee had full authority to hold and keep a Court-Leet and Court-Baron, and to issue writs thereout. The lord of the manor had jurisdic- tion over all waifs, estrays, wrecks, deodands, goods of felons happening and being forfeited within said manor ; he also had the patronage and advowson of native-born chief justice who filled the Supreme Court bench in New York. In his early youth he was wild, and gave his stern and rather straight-laced uncle and guardian much trouble. A zealous and pious Quaker who was his preceptor, one day, while engaged in silent meditation in the woods, heard, as he supposed, a voice from heaven, telling him to go MAP OF BROXX NECK. Boundaries of the Patent to Lewis Morris in 1C75. all churches erected or to be erected in the manor. The tenements (tenants) were to meet together and choose their own assessors ; the land was to beheld in free and common soccage, according to the custom of East Greenwich, and the rental was payable on the fastdayof the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and amounted to six shillings per annum. Lewis Morris was a remarkable man, and the first and preach the gospel to the Indians. The voice was that of young Lewis, who had climbed a tree in the vicinity. The good man really thought of obeying the divine command, but he was told the truth just before his departure on his holy mission. Lewis at one time left his uncle's roof and wandered off, de- pending entirely on his own resources. He first went to Virginia and then to Jamaica, supporting himself WESTCHESTER. 781 by working as a copyist. He returned in time to his uncle's roof, and in November, 1(591, married Isabella Graham, daughter of James Graham, the attorney- general. His uncle, in addition to his property of Morrisania, had acquired a large tract of land in Monmouth County, New Jersey, and young Morris interested himself much in public affairs in that prov- ince. In 1692 he was a judge of the Court of Com- mon Right in East Jersey, and also had a seat in the Council of Governor Hamilton. He had taken up his residence at Tiutern, in the county of Monmouth, where, it is stated was established the first iron-mill in this country. ' In 1698 Jeremiah Basse, having been appointed Governor of New Jersey, and a dispute having risen as to Basse's authority, Morris ranged himself with those who would not acknowledge it. Morris was turned out of the Council and was also fined fifty pounds for contempt of the Governor's authority. On the return of Hamilton to the Gov- ernorship, in 1700, Morris was made president of the Council. While in the Council he came to the con- clusion that the proprietary government of New Jersey was impracticable, and advocated a surrender of the governmental functions of the proprietors to the crown. He succeeded in securing the co-opera- tion of the proprietors to this end, and he then em- barked for England to complete the measure. In 1702 the instrument of surrender was delivered to Queen Anne. Almost immediately afterwards Mr. Morris returned to America and was nominated as Governor of New Jersey, but the English govern- ment having changed its plan, and determined that New York and New Jersey should both be governed by oneexecutive, though having two Legislatures, Colonel Morris' name was withdrawn. Lord Cornbury was made Governor of both provinces and arrived here in 1703. Morris had been recommended to him as a proper person to take into his Council. He was duly appointed and not only became a prominent member of the Council, but also the special opponent of the Governor. Cornbury removed him from the Council in 1704, but though reinstated by order of the Queen, he was again suspended in the following year. In 1707 he Wius a member of the General Assembly, and he, with Gordon and Jennings and the other members of the opposition, passed a resolution jire- ferring to the Queen complaints against Cornbury's administration. This representation had a good effect in England, for in 1708 Morris was again appointed to the Council, Cornbury having been superseded by Lovelace ; but on Lovelace's death and Ingoldsby coming into power, Morris, who did not agree with the latter, was again suspended. In 1710, Robert Hunter being made Governor, Morris was again at the head of the Coun- cil. He at that time took a very active part in the busi- 1 Papers of GoTernor Morris — New Jersey Historical Society (William A. Whitehead, editor). ness of New York. He was a warm supjiorter of Hunter's administration, and on one occasion, whilea member of Assembly, was expelled from the House for his violent language in support of the Governor. He was then a member-elect from the borough of Westchester, but was re-elected by his constituents. He was appointed chief justice of New York in 1720 by Burnet, Hunter's successor, and continued as such through Burnet's and Montgomerie's administrations. Montgomerie died in 1731, and after his death and until the arrival of Cosby, in 1732, Morris acted as Gover- nor of New Jersey, still retaining his position of chief justice in New York. On the accession of Cosby Morris' relations to the government changed and he was suspended from his office as chief justice by Cosby after having served as such for twenty years. The immediate cause of his suspension was his opposition to the views of his associate judges in relation to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in equity cases. Cosby and Ri]i Van Dam had a controversy before the Supreme Court involving their respective rights to the remuneration received by the latter as acting Governor during the period which elapsed between the death of Montgomerie and the arrival of Cosby. ^Morris decided in favor of Van Dam. Cosby was much displeased with the opinion, and on the Gover- nor demanding a copy of it, Morris had it printed and sent to him with a letter which was decidedly dis- courteous to the Governor. Cosby removed him in 1733 and ai)pointed James De Lancey as his successor. This De Lancey was the father of De Lancey of De Lanccy's Mills, at West Farms. For note as to De Lancey family see supra. His removal, however, made him more popular with the people. The county elected him at once to the Assembly, and the borough of Westchester elected his son Lewis. On his visiting New York salutes were fired in his honor, and deputations of citizens met and conducted him with loud acclamations to a public and splendid entertainment. Cosby's admin- istration was so distasteful to his opponents that, in 1734, they determined to lay their grievances before the crown, and IMorris was selected as the messenger to go to England for that purpose. He laid the case before the Privy Council, and obtained a decision pronouncing theGovernor's reasons for his removal as chief justice insufficient, but his mission was other- I wise unsuccessful. Cosby died in 1736, and Morris returned to America. He received an ovation on reaching New York. In 1738 he was appointed colonial governor of New Jersey, and continued as such until 1746, when he died. His remains were buried at Morrisania. By will he gave all that part of the Manor of Morrisania that lay to the eastward of Mill Brook, to his eldest son, Lewis 3Iorris, and that to the \ve.st of Mill Brook, which he called Old Morrisania, to his wife during her life, and on her death to his son, Lewis, during his life, with ■ power to dispose of the same by will. His son, Robert 782 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Hunter Morris, then chief justice of New Jersey, received his fatlier's New Jersey property. Governor Morris's widow died in 1752, and we thus find her son Lewis possessed of all the manor. Lewis Morris, the third proprietor, was born in 1698. He resided at Morrisania, and was twice mar- ried, his first wife being a Miss Staats, and his second a Miss Gouverneur. He was several times a member of the Colonial Assembly, was also judge of the Court of Admiralty, and at one time was judge of the Court of Oyer and Terminer. He died in 1762. His issue were numerous ; by Miss Staats he had Lewis, after- wards the signer of the Declaration of Independence, who commanded the Westchester militia during the Revolution, and married Miss Mary Walton. He died in 1798. His second son, Staats Long Morris, was born in 1728. He held a commission in the British army as lieutenant-general, and remained in England during the American Revolution. He mar- ried the widow of Lord George Gordon. Richard, the third son, was born in 1730. He was a graduate of Yale College, and a lawyer by profession. He was admitted to the bar in 1752, and in 1762 was appointed judge of the Court of Vice-Admiralty. In 1775, having sided with the colony, he resigned his commission. Tryon, the royal governor, requested him to continue in office, but his answer was that he could not sacri- fice his principles to his interest. Special orders were given by Tryon to take possession and then to burn his country seat at Fordham. The estate was devastated and Mr. Morris took refuge within the American lines. On July 31, 1776, the New York provincial Assembly unanimously appointed him Judge of the High Court of Admiralty, but he courteously declined the office. In 1778 he was made a senator and in 1779 Chief Jus- tice of the Supreme Courtof the State, succeeding John Jay, who had been made Chief Justice of the United States. He was a member of the State Convention which ratified the Federal Constitution and in 1790 resigned his office as Chief -lusLice and retired on his farm at Scarsdale, in Westchester County, where, on April 11, 1810, he died. He married Miss Sarah Lud low and by her had two sons and one daughter. They were, Lewis R. Morris, who afterward resided in Ver- mont and during the Revolution was an aide-de- camp to General Sullivan and after the war a mem- ber of the House of Representatives; Robert Mor- ris, who finally settled on the family estate at Ford- ham ; and Mary, who married Major William Pop- ham, of Scarsdale, who served as brigade-major dur- ing the Revolution and was for many years clerk of the Court of Exchequer of this State. The fourth son of Lewis Morris the third was Gouverneur, son of Mr. Morris' second wife, Miss Gouverneur. Gouverneur Morris was born in 1752, graduated at Columbia College, in May, 1768, and commenced the study of the law, under the direction of William Smith, one of the most eminent lawyers and after- 'wards chief justice of the colony of New York. He was admitted to the bar in 1771, and joined with the liberal or anti-governmental party almost on the occa- sion of his becoming a member of the profession. We find from Sparks' life and letters of Gouverneur Morris, that, though only a lad of twenty-three years of age, he was elected from Westchester County a member of the Provincial Congress of the colony of New York in 1775. At that early age he possessed the ability to advocate the issuing of a Continental currency, and the eloquence and knowledge of his subject to convince his hearers to such a point that it was recommended to the Continental Congress for adoption. He did not at that time give up the hope of harmonizing the diff"erences between the mother country and the colonies, for he had a mother who deeply sympathized with the royalists and relatives who were in the employ of the government, but he never forgot the rights of the people of the colony. He was one of the committee who, on behalf of the colony, received General Washington when he passed on his way through New York to assume the com- mand of the Continental troops at Boston, already standing in an hostile attitude before Gage and Howe at that city, but at the same time he counselled that all due respect should be paid to Tryon, the Colonial Governor, at New York until the reconciliatory over- tures of the New York Congress had been acted on by the home government. But, in the same year, and only a few months later, the course of events drove him forever to the American side. The Declaration of Independence had been adopted by the Continen- tal Congress and Morris's half-brother Lewis was a Representative of New York in that body. All the other States had signed; New York held back for the reason that her delegates had not, under their ap- pointment by the Provincial Legislature, any author- ity to sign. Gouverneur Morris, on the fioor of the State Legislature, then showed by a masterly argu- ment why for their security the States must declare their independence of foreign rule and our Colonial Legislature after the passage of the Declaration ordered Lewis Morris and the other representatives of that colony to append their signatures to it. But he had still valuable duties to perform for his native colony, not yet a State. His aged mother had two daughters married to Royalists, and a third had just died. Gouverneur, while serving in the State Congress at Fishkill, received news of his sister's death. His letter to his mother, given at length by Mr. Sparks, is one of the most touching expositions of a struggle between patriotism and filial and fra- ternal love. He could not leave his post of duty, though he acknowledges it to be his mother's wish that he should. His affection for his mother and sis- ter were unbounded, but his duty was paramount be- cause he found himself in a position where it was the obligation of every good citizen to remain, where, by a superior order he was placed. He adds : " What may be the event of the present war is not in man to WESTCHESTER. 783 determine. Great revolutions of Empire are seldom achieved without much human calamity ; but the worst which can happen is to fall on the last bleak mountain of America; and he who dies there in de- fence of the injured rights of mankind is happier than his conqueror, more beloved of mankind." To him, as chairman of a committee of finance was referred the question as to how the sinews of war should be provided by the colony for the support of the troops in their Continental struggle. Later on we find him as one of the Committee of Safety in the north wood.*, advising with Schuyler as to the means of checking the advance of Burgoyue from Canada. In 1777, with Jay and the others of our State's fore- fathers, he joined in formulating the first Constitu- tion of the State at Kingston. To him belongs the honor of having at that early day suggested a constitutional provision for the abol- ishment of "domestic slavery," but he was voted down. To him and Mr. Jay, both Westchester County men, also is due the honor of that clause in the State Constitution which guarantees to all de- nominations the full exercise of their religion. Though Mr. Jay added the clause: " provided the liberty of conscience hereby granted shall not be construed to encourage licentiousness," Gouvernt ur Morris added the clause which was adopted: "or justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the State." He was elected to the Continental Congress in 1777, but did not take his seat till January, 1778. Though then but twenty-seven years of age his reputation had preceded him, and he was immediately appointed on a committee to confer with Washing- ton as to the practical method of putting the army on a better footing. Three tedious months were spent by Morris in the camp at Valley Forge, draft- ing, with Washington and other members of the com- mittee, plans for the proper regulation of the army, its quartermaster, commissary and medical depart- ments. To him is largely due the formulation of the organization of those important branches. No sooner was that work completed than the British Commis- sioners, sent out by Lord North, began their negoti- ations with Congress with a view to harmonizing the differences. Morris was on the committee which con- ferred with them. About this time he was again em- barrassed by the ties of home influence. He had not seen his paternal home nor any of his relatives since the British had taken possession of New York. His mother resided within the British lines. His enemies used these facts against him. His letters to his mother passed through the enemy's hands, and that fact was also urged against his loyalty to the Amer- ican cause. But, while he wrote dutiful letters to his mother, he received none in reply. In one letter to his mother he is very outspoken, both in his af- fection for her and the cause which he championed, but which his mother did not approve of. He says : "I know that for such sentiments I am called a rebel," and that " they are not fashionable among the folks you see." He expresses love for some of his relatives, who are sympathizers with the British. In this connection it nuiy be well to note that be- fore the close of the war, his mother was dangerously ill. He obtained permission to visit her through the British commander at New York ; but the newspaj)ers took the matter up. They censured the project un- less he went inside the enemy's lines clothed with some governmental mission. He was forced by the advice of his friends to forego the visit. About this time he printed his " Observations on the American Revolution," which were published in London. Dominie Tetard, of New Rochelle, having instructed the boy Morris in the French language, the latter was selected by Congress as the proper person to confer with M. Geraud, the French minister, with a view to drafting the instructions for Benjamin Franklin, the first American minister to France. In 1779 he took a prominent part in the debates in Congress with ref- erence to the terms of peace with Great Britain, which were then under discussion, and was also chair- man of the committee which had that matter in charge. But his labors in national affairs were so extensive that he was charged with neglecting his duties to his State, and in 1779-80 he was not re- turned as a member from New York. During the time of his service as a Congressman, though serving as chairman of three committees and performing the duties above referred to, he was forced to practice his profession, as his pay as a Congressman was not suffi- cient for his living ex]>enses. Not being returned to Congress, he [iracticed law in Pennsylvania, but still manifested a great interest in public aflfairs. In Feb- I ruary and March, 1780, he wrote a series of essays on I finance. In May of the latter year, he was thrown , from his carriage and sustained a fracture of his left leg and a dislocation of his ankle joint. Amputation was ordered by the surgeons and Mr. Morris is said to have borne the pain manfully. The amputation is now cited by medical authorities as being a mistake in surgery and as having been unnecessarily made. As an illustration of his good nature and the phil- I osophy with which he bore the infliction, it is related I that a pious friend who called upon him to otter his I condolenc' , also informed him that the accident I was a blessing in disguise, as it would diminish the [ inducements for seeking the pleasures and dissipations of life, and give him ample time for pious meditation. iMurris replied : " My good sir, you argue the matter so handsomely, and point out so clearly the advan- tages of being without legs, that I am almost tempted to part with the other." In the house at Morrisania, [ built by Mr. Morris in later years, are still to be I seen the imprints of his wooden stump made by ' him in going up and down stairs. To another , friend he said : " Oh, sir, the loss is much less , than you imagine ; I shall doubtless be a steadier ' man with one leg than with two." In 1781 RobcrP 784 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Morris, superintendent of the finances, appointed Gouverneur assistant superintendent, at the enor- mous sahiry of eighteen hundred and fifty dollars per annum. He served in that cai^acity for nearly three years. He also acted as one of the commission- ers for the exchange of prisoners of war in 1782. In 1783-84 he returned to New York, the treaty of peace having been signed, and visited his mother at Mor- risania after an absence of nearly seven years. The estate had sufiered much by the dej^redations of tlie troops on both sides. Timber had been cut off of four hundred and seventy-four acres of woodland and used for ship building, artillery and fire-wood. De Lancey's corps had been quartered on the property, and had erected seventy huts and cultivated the land, burning the wood for fuel. By the terms of the treaty of peace the English were bound to pay these claims, and they were duly presented to the govern- ment in England by General Staats Long Morris. Gouverneur, in themeautinie, resumed the 2)ractice of the law, having resigned his jiositiou in the United States Treasury. Having made many connections in Philadelphia, he was practically a resident of that city for the next fi've years. In connection with Robert Morris he was engaged in many business operations, such as East India voyages on a large scale, shipments of tobacco from Virginia to France, and the smelting of iron on the Delaware River. He suggested a plan for the coinage of money, but Mr. Jefferson's plan was adopted by Congress. In 1786 his mother died at Morrisania. The prop- erty east of Mill Brook fell to the share of General Staats Long Morris, who resided in England. Gouv- erneur, as the younger son, was to receive two thou- sand pounds from Staats, who had to pay seven thou- sand pounds in all to the younger children. Lewis had already received his share of the property by possessing that portion of Morrisania which lies west of the Mill Brook. As Staats had no intention of residing in America Gouverneur purchased his share and became seized, in fee of Morrisania east of the i Mill Brook, but still continued to reside in Philadol- | phia. In 1787 he was elected a delegate from Penn- sylvania to the convention which formed the consti- tution of the United States and on the dissolution of the convention he repaired to Morrisania and busied himself in putting the estate in order. To arrange some matters relating to his extensive business trans- actions he sailed for France in December, 1787, and from that time down to 1792 was for several years a resident of Paris, attending, most of the time, to private affairs, traveling occasionally in England and on the continent, and in the interim acting for a short time as agent for the American government in conducting &pour parler with England with a view to an interchange of ambassadors, but without success. His journal contains much interesting information as to the politics and society of France at the time of the outbreak of the French Revolution. In January, 1792, he was appointed minister plen- ipotentiary from the United States to the Court of France. On August 10, 1792, the King and Queen were taken prisoners by the mob, and on the 31st of August, Morris was advised by Talleyrand to ask for his passport and leave France, as the minister of foreign affairs had written him an insulting letter; but an apolog)^ having been sent, he stayed in France awaiting instructions from America as to what course he should pursue with reference to the acknowledge- ment of the new revolutionary government. He was known to be personally opposed to the principles ot the revolutionists and the King intrusted to his care a large sum of money, for which he afterwards scrupulously accounted. When the Marquis of Lafay- ette was made a prisoner by the Austrian and Prus- sian governments, Morris fiirnished him and also his wife with funds, which were afterwards allowed as governmental disbursements by the United States. He also drafted a petition which was signed by Madame de Lafayette, asking the King of Prussia for her husband's release. He continued to reside in France during the Reign of Terror, although the diplomats from other governments had left. At one time it was reported that he had been killed by revo- lutionists. His friend, Robert Morris, wrote him from America, advising him to resign and go home, but he replied, that " it is not permitted to abandon a post in the hour of difiiculty." He took up his resi- dence however, at Sainport, about thirty miles from Paris, on about twenty acres of land which he pur- chased, only coming to Paris on matters of business. Many applications were made to him to grant the privilege of American registers to French vessels. He had also to file with the French government pro- tests against the decrees of the convention, imposing restrictions on American commerce in violation of treaties already existing, and remonstrated against outrages by French privateers on American vessels. Americans were frequently imprisoned and he ob- tained their release. In 1793-94 the American government demanded the recall of Minister Genet. This demand was of course i)resented by Mr. Morris to the French govern- ment and was at once acceded to. In return, France solicited Mr. Morris' recall and in reciprocity the de- maud could not be refused. In recalling him our Secretary of State assured him that he had given per- fect satisfaction, and the President gave him like as- surances. Mr. Monroe arrived in Paris in 1794 as Mr. Morris' successor. The latter then traveled ex- tensively through the principal countries of Europe. In his journal aj^pears the celebrated saying so often quoted, which he wrote concerning the character ot the Swiss: "The first lesson of trade is. My son get money. The second is My son get money honestly if you can, but get money ; the third is, My son get money, but honestly, if you would get much money." He also visited many parts of Ger- WESTCHESTER. 785 many, spending the winter and spring of 1795 at j Altona, a suburb of Hamburgh. Later on he visited the cities of the Baltic, and in June went to London. He travelled through Great Britain, and in the follow- ing year visited Berlin, Dresden and Vienna. There he plead for the release of Lafayette, but was unsuc- cessful. He then re-visited Berlin, and afterwards made quite a long stay at Brunswick. In the mean- time he was instrumental in furnishing I'unds for the Duke of Orleans, afterwards Louis Philippe, to visit America. In 1798 he returned to America, and at once set about improving his estate, and built the house now standing at Morrisania, and occupied by his granddaughter, Mi-s. Alfred Davenport. The leg- islature of New York elected him to the United States Senate. May, 1800, he took his seat. He labored on the side of the Federalis'.s and served but three years. As senator he advocated an internal revenue tax as preferable to a revenue raised by duties on imported articles. His party was opposed to the acquisition of Louisiana, but Mr. Morris voted for it and his argu- ment on the value of the navigation of the Mississippi river is considered one of the finest of his efforts. His term expired on March 4, 1803. A change in parties prevented his re-election, and with the expiration of his term his political life ended. He passed the re- mainder of his life at Morrisania. " An ample for- " tune, numerous friends, a cliarraing retreat, and a " tranquil home were the elements of his happiness ''and filled up the measure of his hopes." But his mind was still amply employed. In 1803 he travelled through the New England States and the Canadas, and two or three months of each succeeding year of his life he devoted to travelling for pleasure or visiting lands in new countries in which he had [ largely invested. The cultivation of his fiirm, re- ceiving the visits of friends and acquaintances, study and an extensive correspondence on politics and business occupied his tirre. I He wrote much on divers subjects. The larger part of his effusions may be found in the New York | Evening Post, the Examiner and the United States Ga- j zetfe. He became, according to Mr. Sparks, an ultra j Federalist. His nom de plume was "An American." Soon alter his return to America he pronounced an oration on the death of Washington, at the request of the corporation of New York. His eulogy on Hamilton is famous. He also delivered an oration in j honor of the memory of George Clinton, and another j on the Restoration of the Bourbons. This last was translated into French and published in Paris. He was president of the New York Historical Society. Among his guests was General Moreau, and Madame de Stael was an intimate friend and life-long corres- pondent. He married Miss Ann Carey Randolph on Christmas Day, 1809. Many give Mr. Morris the credit of originating the project of the Erie Canal. It will be remembered that he was sent as one of the Committee of Safety to Schuyler's army, then at I Fort Edward. Though but a youth, he was filled with the project, an^l while arranging with Schuyler and the other persons about the details of the campaign in their leisure moments he descanted on the facilities afforded for the development of the country by the numerous water ways which intersected it. He predicted that among the " rising glories of the western world at no distant day the waters of the great inland seas would, by the aid of man, break through their barriers and mingle with those of the Hudson." While travelling in Scotland in 1795 he notes in his diary his impressions of the Caledonian Canal and says : When I see this, my mind oi>ens to a view of wealth for the interior of America which hitherto I had rather conjectured than seen." In ISOl, after his visit to Canada and Niagara Falls, he described to a friend in London a visit to Lake Erie : "At this point commences a navi- gation of more than one thousand miles. Shall I lead your astonishment to the verge of incredulity ? I will: know then that one-tenth of the expense borne by Britain in the last campaign would enable ships to sail from London through Hudson River into Lake Erie." At a dinner party, in Washington, not many yeare after this letter Robert Morris asked Gouvern- eur what he would think if they were then in con- vention and it should be proposed to establish the seat of government at Newburgh, on the Hudson. He replied : '' Yes, that would have been the i)lace " for the seat of Government. And the members of "Congress could have come from all parts by water." The company were astonished and asked how. Mor- ris answered: "Why, by tapping Lake Erie and "bringing its waters to the Hudson, by an inclined plane or a water table which can be found." Simeon De Witt, Surveyor General of New York, gives Mr. Morris the credit of starting the idea of direct com- munication between Lake Erie and the Hudson, and Stephen Van Rensselaer, one of the first canal com- missioners, considered Mr. Morris " the father of our "great canal.'' Mr. Morris was chairman of the canal commissioners from March, 181U, until within a few months of liis death. He and De Witt Clinton went on a special mi ssion to Congress for the purpose of obtaining Federal aid for the construction of the canal, but though they drafted a bill for the purpose, it never came up, as there were too many divided in- terests in that body. In the midst of his labors, Mr. Morris died at Morrisania, November 6, 1816, in the sixty-fifth year of his age. His remains were buried where now St. Anne's Church stands, the cast aisle covering their original resting-))lace. They were afterwards transferred to the family vault, which is the fiist one east of the church. His wife caused a marble slab to be placed over the temporary tomb, and that still remains.' His will was dated October 26, 1816. In it he con- 1 Tlie ttutlior is indebUil to Jaml Sparks' " Life and Writings of Gout- enieur Morris " for the niateriale of tli« foregoing sketch. 786 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. firms an ante-nuptial contract, by which he had set- tled on his wife two thousand six hundred dollars per annum, and in addition he gave to her, during her life, his estate at Morrisania. The improvements were to be made at the expense of the estate. In his will was also the peculiar provision, that if his wife should see fit to marry, she should have six hundred dollars per annum in addition "to defray the increased expenditure which may attend that connection." His son Gouverneur, was then given the whole of the residue and remainder of the estate, except such other bequests as he made under the will. If he should die before he attained the age of twenty-one years, or afterwards, " not having uiade a will," he then gave the estate to such one or more of the male descendants of his brothers and sisters, and in such proportions as his wife should designate ; but if she made no such designation, he then gave the estate to Lewis Morris Wilkins, the son of his sister Isabella, on condition that he assume the name of Morris. He then gave to his nephew, Gouverneur Wilkins, twenty-five thousand dollars, to be paid to him when he should attain the age of thirty years, provided his conduct should be such as in the opinion of his executor and executrix " becomes a good citizen." His friend Moss Kent, and his widow were charged with the execution of the will. The son Gouverneur, is still living, and has made a will and the legacy was duly paid Gouverneur Wilkins. Title searchers often raise this question, and as it affects all that part of Morrisania east of Mill Brook and as far north as the Home for Incurables, near Fordham,the facts are worthy of record. We thus find Bronx Land and the "additional" lands mentioned in the patents of Morrisania east of Mill Brook, vested in the present Gouverneur Morris. His mother enjoyed her life estate in the property until 1837, when she died and was buried under the site of the present St. Anne's Church, which, in 1841, was erected by her son Gouverneur, in remembrance of her, and with respectful regard to two other valued relations of the name was called St. Ann's Church. Thus far we have carried the records of the tow-n- ship through the successive stages, from its discovery to the Dutch occupancy, the first seizure by the Brit- ish, the second and brief Dutch regime and the final establishment of the British rule. This long period is fraught with little of interest that has not been mentioned. One incident was the mortgaging of his interests in the manor of Fordham by the contentious John Archer, to Steenwyk, one of the short-lived councillors of Governor Colve. Afterwards Steen- wyk, by deed from Archer, obtained possession of the entire manor, and he and his pious wife willed it to the mini.sters, elders and deacons of the Reformed Congregation of the Nether Dutch Church, on the express condition that it should not be sold, but pre- sumably that the congregation should receive the benefits of its rents, issues and profits in perpetuity. The intentions of the Steenwyks were, however, found impracticable, and the General Assembly of the Colony of New York authorized the congregation to sell the lands. This was done, and the purchasers were hardy and thrifty people, who figured conspicu- ously in the annals of the Revolution. Fordham, Bronx Land (the present Morrisania) and Jessup's, Richardson's, Cornell's and the West- chester patents have been so subdivided that the his- tory of their development would be only a tedious chronicle of the layiug out of highways, the marks which each farmer placed upon his horses and cattle, and of law-suits, which prove that the former occu- pants were as tenacious of their individual rights as their successors to-day. The simple annals of the people between the final establishment of English dominion and the Revolution are not of general in- terest. THE REVOLUTIONARY PERIOD. When, in 1775, the contention with the mother coun- try had come to a critical stage, the citizens of Westches- ter township prepared to organize their military power. The following papers, which are contained among the returns on file at Albany, tell the story of their action : "BoRoi GH AND Town of Westchester, 24"' Aug', 1775. " To the Hoiihln PnicincitU Congress for the Colony of New York : " We, the Subscribers, appointed a sub-Committee to inspect the Elec- tion of Militia Officers for the said Town, do most humbly Certify, that the following persons were Chosen this 24th day of Aug«, 1775, by a Ma- jority of Voices duly qualified for that purpose, agreeable to the resolu- tion of the Hou''i= Congress above said (Viz.) John Oakley, Captain ; 1 Lieut. Nicli' Berrien, 2 Lieut. Isaac Leggett, Ensign Frederick Phillipse Stevenson. f Thomas Hunt. " Committee, \ James Ferris. Lewis Graham. " Electors. " Anthony Allaire. Abraham Odle. ■Vol. i. Rev. Papers, page 122. The original document is somewhat mutilated, and consequently the list of electors is not complete. Izarell I nderhill. Robert Farrington. Hendrick Brown, Ju'. Francis Smith. Thomas Merrill. William Green. Abraham Post. Abraham Einnians. Dennis Post. Isaac Green. Usial Fountain. Edward Ryer. Henry Tayler. Gilbert Brown. Wni. Rose. Jacob Post. James Munro. Lewis Post. John Warner. John Williams. Thomas Oakly. George Hadley. Charles Tayler. Isaac Hadley. Benjamin Farrington. Joseph Hadley. Robert Brown. Joshua Verniyliea. Jacob Tayler. John Cartright. Henry Pre>her. .lohn Ryer. Elijah Tayler. George Berian. Joseph Oakley, Jun. Izrael Post. Daniel Deen. John Cock. Thomas Farrington. Henry Bursen. James Parker. Abraham Asten. Wm. Post. George Worts. Samuel Williams. Abraham Verinyliea. James Crawford. Frederick Vermyliea. George Crawford. Edward Cartright. John Odle. Frederick Brown. John Devo. Elethan Tayler, Jun'.' Tobias Rickeman. WESTCHESTER. 787 It was more convenient for the people of West Farms and Fordham to have a separate company, and therefore they sent in the subjoined petition : " To the Honorable Provincial Coitgi-fts foi' the prorince of New York : " The potitiou of the subscribere, Inhabitants of the Miinor of Foiclham and AVest Farms, in the County of Westchester, Humbly Shewoth. " That we are sununoned to appear at Westchester in t)f(Ier to Choose OfBccrs, according to the Kesohition of the Congress, it having been Represented (as \\m understand! that there was not a competent number of men in our District to form a CtiMjpany. We therefore beg leave to in- form that the Manor of Fordham a»d the West Farms luive in the Militia always been considered as a district|by themselves, and that within their limits there is upwards of Seventy men fitt to bear arms. And that an attendance at Westchester xipon the meeting of the Company will be at- tended with great Inconveuiency to many of the Inhabitants and there- fore Injurious to the service intended to be advanced, from which Con- siderations your petitionei-s Humbly pray the Honorable Congress will be pleased to order that the Manor of Fordham and the West Farms have a Company'withiu themselves and that they Elect their own Ofticers under such Inspection as the Honorable Congress in their wisdom shall think best. And your petitioners shall ever pray. Nicholas Berrien. James McKay. Isaac Valintiue. Robert Campbell. Peter Valintiue. Eden Hunt. John Stevens. Isaac H\int. Benjamin Curser. James Archer. Abraham Dyckman. Sanuiel Embree, Jun'. John Turner. Edward Harris. Benjamin Valentine. John CoUard. his Cornelius Jacobs. George x Pilpet. hezekiah Ward. mark Tunis Garrison. Isaac Valintiue, .Tnnior. Isack Cant. Peter Bussing, .Inner. Gilbert Taylor. Peter Bussing. Robert Gilmer. Abraham Wils. Benjamin Archer, Jun' Benjamin Curser, J'. Daniel Devoe, Ju'. Hendrick Kyer. John Embree, Sen'. John Lint. Jacob Lent. John Ryer. his Isaac Conser. Abram x Lent. Isaac Corser, Jii^. mark tunus Leforge. I'ennis Ryer. Phillip Hunt. Jacob alentine. Stephen Embree. Abraham garison. Nathaniel Lawrence. James Grobe. Peter Devoe. John Embree, Jun'. James Swaim. Thomas Cromwell. Nazareth Brewer. Gerrardus Cromwell. Thomas Hunt. Obadiah Hide. Abraham Leggett. John Curser. William Leggett. Sirion Williams. John Leggett, Jun'. John Ryer, Jun'. Robert Hunt, Jun', Jacob Chappel. Cornelius Leggett. John Gan-ison. Mr. Woods. John Jacobs. John Hedger. Thomas Dogherty. Thomas Hedger. John Clark. Stephen Edwards. John Devoe. James Rock. John Blizard. George Higby. John Walbrin. Jacob Hunt. John Warnick. Levi Hunt. Thomas Gemble.> Jeremiah Regen. " September 5, 1775." Their prayer was frranted, for in October the fol- lowing minute is made in the Revolutionary Military Records : " Officcrfofihe Wetl Farmt and Fordham Company. " West F.\rms and Manor of Fokpiiam, In the BoKoi iai of Westi hkster. 21" of October, 1775. " It being determined by a Committee of the County of West Chester, ' Revolutionary Papers, toI. 1. page 135. that the above said places should be one distinct Beat or district ; We the Subscriber being appointed a Committee of Inspection to preside at the Election for Officers of the Jlilitia for said beat do most humbly repre- sent to the Honor the Provincial Congress for the Province of New York, that they have proceeded to the choice of Officers ia Conformity to the Orders of the s'' Hon'ble Provincial Congress, when the underwritteD Persons were unanimously Chose. Capt. Nicholas Berrian, 1" Lieut. Gilbert Taylor, 2>i Do. Daniel Devoe, Jun', Ensign Benjamin Valentine. "Thomas Hunt. ".\11UAI1AM LEiiCETT. "[Commissions issued this 31"' Oct', 1775.] " In the spring of 1776 the war between Great Brit- ain and the colonies had broken out ; the battle of Bunker Hill and the evacuation of Boston by the British had taken place, and Washington, with his enthusiastic but illy equipped army, was on Manhattan and Long Islands, in front of the British invaders. On July 5, 1776, General Mifflin, then stationed at the north end of Manhattan Island, wrote Washing- ton that he feared the British might take possession of the heights north of King's Bridge (now known as Spuyten Duyvil), and asked if he should detach a party to oppose theni.'^ At the same time the British ships " Roebuck " and " Vidture" sailed up the North Riveras far as King's Bridge and dropped an- chor near the shore. A violent cannonade ensued, as the Americans had ojiened a battery against them. The British raised anchor and went farther up the North River.' This battery damaged the British fleet both in hull and rigging. This action must have oc- curred near Fort Washington, and a few of the shells only fell on the Westchester shore, but the raid of the British fleet impressed General Mifflin as to the neces- sity of fortifying King's Bridge, Spuyten Duyvil and Fordham Heights, for on August 6, 1776, he dispatched Col. Holden from Fort Washington to King's Bridge with orders to make it more tenable,* and cannon were sent for that purpose. It is plain, from the annals of that time, that Washington appreciated the strategic value of the pass at Spuyten Duyvil and Fordham Heights, as he feared an ascent by way of the North River with the British fleet, and the destruction of King's Bridge, by a boat expedition.' Putnam and Wiebert, the engineer, were ordered to throw up works for the protection of the pass. The New York Provincial Congress had the same appreciation of the strategic importance of that point. Robert Livingston, on August 10, 177(), wrote Wash- ington about it in behalf of Congress. He cautioned him as to the importance of the Westchester shore and urged sending regular troops there with artillery. Congress felt the danger of the destruction of King's Bridge before any force could be sent to prevent it. The New York Congress had a lack of good faith in its militia because of its raw condition, bad pay and e(iuipment ; and in some cases their loyalty to the * Force's "Annals," vol. i. pages 1328-1330. ' 1 Force, 230, 347. Also the story of the author's grandfather, who picked up one of the solid shots sent on the Westchester shore and wit- nessed the engagement. « 1 Force, 790. » l Force, 886. 788 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. new cause was doubted. They therefore suggested that the country north of Spuyten Duyvil Creek should be well guarded. "They knew of no country capable of being so well defended." They also sug- gested that all the cattle in the country be removed and jjurchased by the army authorities.' But Wash- ington had already appreciated this necessity and was throwing up strong breastworks at that point. The NevA' York Congress, at the same time, ordered out the whole of the Westchester militia, under its brigadier- general, Lewis Morris, to take possession of such points on Long Island Sound and Hudson River as he thought most exposed to the enemy.^ . Meantime reconnoisances developed the necessity of securing from the enemy the upper end of Manhattan Island and Fordham Heights. Fort Washington was built on Manhattan Island and Fort Independence' on what is now known as the Giles property, just north of the West Farms or Fordham ]\Iauor line, on the Westchester shore so as to command Spuyten Duyvil Creek. * General Heath was placed in command of the troops in that neighborhood.^ The defeat of the Americans on Long Island and Washington's masterly retreat to Manhattan Island showed that his precautions as to the importance of a line of retreat via King's Bridge and Westchester County were well timed. The New York Congress had fled from the city to Harlem and after the battle of Long Island it adjourned not to meet again until it assembled at White I'lains. A Committee of Safety was appointed and it met on August 20, 177fi, at King's Bridge. The State treasure-chest was also brought there, but almost immediately removed up into the Saw-Mill Valley to Mr. Odell's house. It was teared that the British would go direct from Brooklyn to some point ontheSound, march across country, cut > 1 Force, 88(;. Idem, 1494. 2.\s a speciiiien of the eriuipnient of General Morris' brigade, the fol- lowing extract I'roiri the orders of the Provincial or New York C(»ngres3 is given : If any of the men were without arms, they were ordered to bring " a shovel, a spade, pick-axe or scythe, straightened and fixed on a jiole." The brigadier of this motley army was ordered to "apprehend and arrest . . . disaffected jiei-sons." All the militia was placed nnder " marching orders," and only snlticient guards were to he left behind to prevent insurrection of the slaves and the prisoners in the jails. " Dis- armed and disafl'ected male inhabitants, between sixteen and fifty-five years of age," were to be " broujiht along" by this militia as "fatigue men,'' and the brigadier was given power to institute courts-martial against those who did not obey his orders. — Force, vol. i., 1494. 3 Fort Independence is located by Mr. Bancroft, in his " History of the United States," just north of Spuyten Duyvil Creek, on the crown of the ridge which lies between Tippett's lirook and Hudson River. Mr. Edsall, the author of the "History of King's Bridge Township," the author of this sketch, old maps, local traditions and other authorities, including Gen- eral Washington's field map, on file in the Historical Society Library, in New York City, show that eminent historian to be mistaken in location. Mr. Bancroft has used British, not .\merican data. There was an earth- work near Spuyten Duyvil erected by the .Americans, probably the one ordered to be built by Washington, under Putnam's and VVieberfs direc- tion, alluded to in the te.xt ; but Fort Independence stood on the Mont- gomery farm, not far from the present route of Sedgwick Avenue, as just opened by the city authorities, and somewhat to the west of it. < Heath's "Memoirs," 52. « Idem., 54. off the communication with the main at King's Bridge and hem in Washington's army on Manhattan Island.* Howe was making his reconnoisances. On August 27th two ships and a brig anchored a little north of Throgg's -Neck. General Heath sent Colonel Gra- ham with a regiment to prevent any landing, but be- fore he arrived several barges had landed on City Is- land and killed a number of cattle. ' When the regi- ment arrived, the British retreated with one prisoner and fourteen head of cattle. Heath at once asked Mifflin for additional artillery and made an arrange- ment for a floating bridge over Harlem River. ' In the mean time the militia at Throgg's Neck and City Island wanted to go home. The crops had to be gathered and Colonel Drake stated to the New Y''ork Congress that it "would be a very great ease to the county at this season.'" On the 31st, Hand's, Shee's, Magaw's, Broadhead's and Miles' battalions joined Heath's command at King's Bridge'" and on Septem- ber 4th, Washington and Heath had a consultation and dined together at that place. The result of this conference was that Heath formed a chain of senti- nels and videttes, extending on the Westchester shore from Morrisania, via Hunt's Point, all the way to Throgg's Neck, and broke up the roads leading from Morrisania and de Lancey's Mills (West Farms) so as to render them impassable for the enemy's artillery." In many instances he caused trees to be felled across the roads, and in other places dug deep pits. On the 10th of September the British began landing troops on Montressor's Island, (now known as Randall's Is- land). As the fight on Manhattan Island had taken place at Kips Bay and Harlem Plains, a consultation of general officers was held on September 16th. The generals were divided in opinion as to what course the British would i)urs"ue. Some supposed Fort Washington would be the point of attack ; others that they would land either at Morrisania, Hunt's or Throgg's Point. It was therefore determined in Coun- cil to guard against both contingencies. Ten thou- sand men were to be kept on Manhattan Island, and Heath's division was increased to ten thousand men; a floating bridge was to be thrown across Harlem Creek, so that the two bodies could support each other as circumstances might require. On September 18th the British army was between the city of New York and the American lines, which latter extended across the island on the north <• A graphic description of the troubles which a family in Lower West- chester endured is given in the correspondence of a young military officer on the staff" of General Sullivan. He had a leave of absence to go to his ho.ne and remove his aged mother and sisters, with tiie fiocks and herds, to a jilace of safety in the interior of the county. — N. Y. Hist. Soc. MSS. 'Heath's "Memoirs," 55 ; Force, ii. 108. »1 Force, 1184. »! Force, 1552 ; Heath, 5". l» Idem, 50. "Force, ii. 2.39-240. 1 WESTCHESTER. 789 side of Harlem Plains, Heath had a strong picket of four hundred men at Morrisania, with a chain of sentinels, within half gun-shot of each other, posted along the shore and near the passage between Morrisania and Randall's Island. The American sentries were ordered not to fire at the British unless the latter began; but the British did begin, and there was freciuent firing between the pickets. One day a British otHcer walking on the shore of Randall's Island was wounded by a shot from an American sen- tinel. An officer with a flag soon after came down to the creek, and calling for the American officer of the guard, informed him that if the American sentinels fired any more the commander on the island would cannonade Colonel Morris' house, in which the Ameri- can picket officers were quartered. The American oflicer sent word to General Heath asking for in- structions as to what reply he should make. He was told to answer that the Americans were instructed not to fire unless they were fired upon and then to return the fire ; that such would be their conduct, and that as to cannonading Colonel Morris' house, they might act their pleasure. The firing ceased for some time, but one day a Scotch sentinel on the British side fired at an American and the shot was returned. A British otficer came down and said that he thought there was to be no firing between the sentinels. The Americans retorted that the British fired first. The British officer replied, "He shall then pay for it." The sentinel was relieved and there was no further firing between the pickets at that place, and they were afterwards so civil to each other that they used to exchange tobacco by throwing the roll across the creek. September 22d two seamen deserted from the British frigate " La Brune," which was lying near Randall's Island, and stated that they had but a few men on the island, that the cannon which had been on the island had been put on board the " La Brune," but that there were a number of officers at the house. Acting on this information, an expedition consisting of two hundred and forty men, was sent on board of three flat-boats with a fourth astern with a light three-pound cannon on board in case it might be found necessary. They were to drop down Harlem River with the ebb tide, and they calculated that at daybreak the tide would be sufficient on the flood to float the boats off the flats at the island. Major Henly of the general's staff, volunteered to be one of the party, and much against the general's wish he was permitted to go. Notice had been given to the pickets on the York Island side not to fire on the boats or hail them as they went down the river, but the sentinel nearest the island had not been in- structed. General Heath was standing nearly oppo- site, on the Westchester side, to witness the attack. The sentinel challenged the boats and ordered them to come to the shore ; the people on board the boats said that they were friends, but the sentry kept on chal- lenging. The answer was, " We tell you we are friends — hold your tongue." Major Henly sprang overboard and swam to the shore, and wading up to General Heath, asked him, " Sir, will it do?" General Heath, holding him by the hand, said, " I see nothing to the contrary." Henly replied : " Then it shall do " and he waded back to the boat and got in. The sentinel on the New York side shouted " If you don't come to the shore, I tell you I'll fire." Some one in the boats cried out " Pull away." The boats went on and the sentinel fired. The boats reached the island almost at the moment intended, just as daylight was break- ing. Lieutenant-Colonel Jackson and M.ojor Logan and another field officer of a New York regiment were in the first boat. They jumped ashore, the col- onel remaining in charge of his detachment. The other two were to go to the right and left, and lead the men from the other boats, which were to land on either side of the first boat. The men from the first boat landed; the enemy's guard charged, but were instantly driven back, but the men in the other two boats, instead of landing, lay on their oars. The British seeing this, returned to the charge, and the single boat- load seeing themselves abandoned, returned to the boat. Lieutenant-Colonel Jackson received a musket-ball in his leg and Major Henly was shot through the heart and instantly killed. The boat joined the others and all three returned, having lost in all about fourteen killed, wounded and missing. Major Henly was deeply regretted. If only one other of the boats had landed her men, success was probable, if both the others had landed, in the opinion of all concerned, success would have been certain. The delinquents in the other boats were arrested and one of the captains tried by court-mar- tial and cashiered.' September 29th a large number of boats crossed over from Long to Randall's Island, which move- ment was continued on the 30th. The same day a frigate came through Hell Gate and lay alongside the "La Brune." About noon she hoisted sail and went to the eastward, and in the evening another ship came up. October 1st she was at anchor in the channel between Harlem and Banian's orEldridge's Island. ' On October 3d General Heath, with Colonel Hand, made a reconnoisance as far as Throgg's Neck. The causeway between the village of Westchester and the Neck seemed to them to be a strong strategic point. The old mill then, and for many years afterwards, stood at the west end of the causeway, and there was a bridge of j)lanks there then, as there is now. A long range of cord-wood was })iled up on the village or west side of the bridge and was so advantageously situated that it seemed as though it had been placed there for the purpose of forming a breastwork. A detachment 1 of twenty-five picked men from Hand's regiment of I riflemen was sent to defend this position, with 1 Heath's Menu., 63-64. 3 Ward's Island. 790 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. instructions that in case the enemy should advance from Throgg's Neck, they should take up the plank- ing from the bridge and have everything ready to set the mill on fire, but not to do so unless the advance of the enemy could not be checked. Another party was stationed at the head of Westchester Creek. This point must have been somewhere near the pres- ent station on the Port Chester Branch Railroad known as Timpson's.^ On the 12th eighty or ninety boats full of British troops went up the Sound from Randall's Island. They landed' at Throgg's Neck and at once pushed on for the village of Westchester. Hand's men opened fire and took up the planking from the bridge. The British then tried to turn the American flank by marching around the head of the creek, but Colonel Prescott's regiment and Bryant with a three-pounder, reinforced the riflemen at the village — Colonel Graham, with a regiment of West- chester militia, and Jackson, with a six-pounder, assisted Hand's other men to hold the head of the creek. The British were checked and went into camp on the Neck. Our riflemen and the British yagers kept up a continual skirmish, and both sides threw up earthworks on each side of the old bridge. Washington visited Westchester the same day, though his headquarters were still at Harlem Heights. In his correspondence with Congress on the subject of this skirmish, he describes Throgg's Neck as a " kind of island," but the water which surrounded it as "fordable at low tide." He reported throwing up the earthworks, but from the number of vessels he had seen go up the East River, and also from reports brought in by deserters, he felt convinced that the greatest part of Howe's army had gone eastward, and that his object was to get into the rear of the Americans and cut off" commnication between Man- hattan Island and the mainland. He considered the country back of Throgg's Point defensible, especially by reason of its stone walls, both along the I'oads and across the fields, so that the enemy would have great difficulty in advancing artillery or even any large body of infantry with any degree of order, except by the main road. By the 13th it was evident to all that Westchester County would be the next point of attack by the British. No less than forty-two sail had passed the mouth of Harlem River going eastward, and it was apparent that this movement was no feint, but that Howe meant to " make his covp " in the direction of Westchester.'^ The troops at Harlem and at King's Bridge were ordered to their alarm posts, reinforce- ments were sent to King's Bridge and rations for three days' march were ordered to be cooked immediately. The next day General Heath visited the troops at Westchester. Skirmishing was kept up for a couple 1 Heath's ■' Memoire," page 68, and Edward de Lancey's paper on the Battle of Fort Washington, vol. i., MugmiiK of American Hi»torij. 2 Force, ii. 991 : Force, ii. 1025. of days, and then our position being found too strong to carry with light troops, Howe advanced his heavy guns up the Throgg's Neck road and commenced the erection of a heavy earthwork immediately opposite the Westchester Bridge, not far from the site of the present Presbyterian Church.^ While this handful of men were checking the advance of the entire British army, Washington heard of the arrival, as they landed at New Rochelle, of the Hessian re- inforcements, and was at once convinced that he could no longer hold the upper part of Manhattan Island, but must, with his illy equipped army, retreat beyond the Highlands of the Hudson. A council of war was held at King's Bridge ; the Al- bany post road was ordered to be put in good order by Colonel Drake's regiment of Westchester militia,* and everything put in train for the retreat of the main army from the island of New York to the main. On the 18th the Westchester Militia Regiment at the causeway was being relieved, when the enemy opened fire from the embrasures of the heavy earthwork opposite the village. Heath ordered a brigade to ad- vance to the support of the party at the bridge, the general himself leading, but before he arrived at the bridge he found that the entire British army were moving toward the head of the creek. Washington just then arrived on the field and ordered him to fall back and form his division for action farther west, and in such position as to also protect the main army at King's Bridge should the enemy laud another force at Morrisania. For some unaccountable reason Howe did not press on towards King's Bridge, but followed a route which corresponds to the present road leading from Throgg's Neck to Pelham Bridge, and being well provided with boats, he crossed Pelham Bay and that evening the head of his column was at New Rochelle, where he was joined by the Hessian reinforcements.* Had he pushed directly for the Harlem River and Spuyten Duyvil Creek he would have been able to cut off part, if not the whole, of the American army. Soldiers of our last war and military men generally may regard this small fight at the old Westchester Bridge as a mere skirmish and hardly worth record- ing, but it was the Lexington of Westchester and a son of the soil should always regard the prosaic old causeway and the ruined foundations of the old mill still to be seen on that historic spot, with sentiments of reverence and patriotism. The Westchester Militia and Hand's riflemen at Westchester Creek and bridge covered Washington's retreat with his army to the entrenchments at White Plains and enabled him to in- augurate his masterly defensive policy which resulted in the establishment of the best and freest govern- ='For a good map of these oiieratious, see Lamb's "Hi.>tor}' of New York," vol. ii. page 140. * Force, ii. page 1078. 5 Heath's "Memoirs ;" Dwight's " Travels ;" Edward de Lancey's paper in "Magazine of American History," on battle of Fort Washington; Force's "Annals." WESTCHESTER. 791 inent ever known to history. It is hoped that the wealth and patriotism of the town of Westchester will some day cause an appropriate monument to be erected near the bridge in commemoration of the battle of Westchester Creek. On the 28th of October the battle of White Plains was fought, and on the 31st, Lasher's troops, which were the last to leave King's Bridge, had joined the rest of the army at White Plains, and Westchester township was denuded of American troojis, and prac- tically within the enemy's lines, Fort Wi\shington being the only American post south of Harlem River. Fort Independence and the other American works about Harlem River and Spuyten Duyvil Creek had been dismantled by the Americans before their re- treat.^ But Westchester was soon revisited by the British, who continued to occupy it, or most of it, for the resi- due of the war. On November 5th, Van Knyphausen marched from New Rochelle and encamped at King's Bridge. Two days before, the British General Grant was at de Lancey's Mills (West Farms), on the Bronx : another brigade was at Mile Square, and the Waldeck Regiment was at Williams' Bridge. On the 12th Rahl with his Hessians had advanced on Manhattan Island as far as Tubby Hook (Inwood), and Fort Washington being already threatened on the south by the British who were left on the island, and the opposite Westchester shore being covered with British troops, Washington advised its surrender,^ but left its evacuation to General Greene's discretion, who was in command of a force on the Jersey shore, at Fort Lee. Congress advised Greene to hold the fort. On the night of the 15th thirty British flat-boats passed up the Hudson, and by both forts, and lay con- cealed in Spuyten Duyvil Creek. In the mean time the British had erected heavy batteries on Fordham Heights or Ridge extending from the Boston road as far south as the present High Bridge, and on the evening of the 15th Howe summoned Colonel Magaw, who was in immediate command at Fort Washington, to surrender. The post of Fort Washington, or rather the grounds which he had to defend, extended from the Hudson to the Harlem River, and were bounded on the north by a line which will about corresjjond to Inwood Street on the New York City nuip, and on the south by One Hundred and Forty-fifth Street. Its extreme length north and south was about two and a half miles, its circuit say six miles. The northernmost point, near what is now known as Inwood Station, was under command of Colonel Rawlings, with a ^Maryland regiment. Magaw ke]>t a small reserve in the citadel or main fort, which was situated on the site of the residence of James Gordon Bennett. Cadwallader commanded the American lines near One Hundred and Forty -fifth or ' Force, 1294; Heath's "Memoirs." < BuDcrofl, V. 448 (Brown & Little's edition). ' One Hundred and Fifty-fifth Streets, and on the Harlem River side Baxter commanded a redoubt on the high hill or blutl' now known as the terminus of Tenth Avenue, and almost opposite the present station of the railways at Morris Dock, on the Westches- ter shore. This red iubt was known as Laurel Hill.' The interval between Laurel Hill and One Hundred and Fifty-fifth Street was left to the casual siipi)ly of troops. On November l(>th the British opened fire with I heavy artillery from Fordham Heights, and made four sei)arate attack,,. Rahl led his troops through I the hills and to the west of King's Bridge road; Von Knyphausen marched nearer the road, towards the Inwood gorge, with officers and men dismounted. The Americans had cannon planted along the north end of the high hill facing the approach from King's I Bridge, and had also constructed an abattis of felled trees. But the British outnumbered the Americans, scaled the steep heights and a hand-to-hand conflict ensued. In the mean time Lord Cornwallis embarked with a large number of troops in the flat-boats which had been concealed at Spuyten Duyvil. They landed at Sherman's Creek, stormed Laurel Hill, captured the battery there, and killed Baxter, its brave com- mander. Lord Percy simultaneously advanced against Cadwallader, who was on the south line. Howe also sent men down the river in boats, so as to j fall on Cadwallader's rear. Magaw and Cadwallader I saw them coming down the river ; their advance was covered by the heavy guns firing from Fordham Heights. Colonel Stirling, of the Highlanders, was the first to land, and scaled the heights somewhere I near the present location of the High Bridge. So soon as the heights were gained, he pushed his men across the island towards the citadel, and the Hes- sians and Percy combining, Fort Washington fell, and from that time to the end of the Revolution Manhattan Island and the adjoining shore remained under British rule and occupation. Thenceforth the Westchester shore, and, in fact, the whole of the ancient township was the scene for many years of raids and foraging parties. The Ameri- can lines extended across Westchester from Dobbs Ferry to the Sound. On one occasion an American scouting party near Williams' Bridge ^«ould have been ambuscaded by a British scouting squad had it not been for the timely warning a young girl gave them of the British approach, she having seen them j from her garret window. In the following autumn the right advanced line of the British extended from Hunt's Bridge to East Chester Creek. They kept continually shifting their position, but towards win- I ter the troops were drawn in quite close to King's I Bridge and the British built a number of huts and cantonments. De Lancey's corps of loyal refugees were (piartered at and near the Morris place, at Mor- s Traces of this earthwork are still to be seen. 792 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. risania. Col. Emmerick's corps, also composed prin- cipally of Tories, [were posted near King's Bridge These troops, when they wanted building material for their winter-quarters, tore down the farmers' houses in the vicinity. The Americans, of course, retaliated, and skirmishes and hairbreadth escapes by the par- tisans of both sides were the order of the day. On one occasion Colonel James de Lancey, while visiting his aged mother at her home at the Mills, had tied his horse, a valuable imported thoroughbred, to the fence. Some American scouts seeing the horse, and knowing his value, immediately took him and carried him within the American lines at White Plains. There some enterprising Yankee bought him. The horse was known as "True Briton," and is said to be the progenitor of the celebrated stock, now known to horse fanciers as "Morgans."' On another occasion Colonel Thomas, an American officer, desirous of visiting his family, and learning that the British had gone into winter-quarters at King's Bridge and Morrisania, ventured home. Word of his arrival reached the Queen's Rangers, the house was surrounded and several of Thomas' men were captured. The colonel jumped from the window and had nearly escaped when one of the Rangers caught him. Thomas was sent as a prisoner to New Lots, on Long Island. There he escaped and remained concealed in the woods for several days. He finally got into the city of New York disguised as a wood-chopper. He had let his beard grow. The British employed a negro who knew him very well to act as a detective for his capture. Thomas saw them coming and went to bed, and when his face was uncovered the negro said that was not the man. Through the influence of a friend, he ob- tained quarters in the house of a widow. One evening, when a search party arrived, she took him down into the cellar, turned a hogshead over him and then threw half a bushel of salt on the head of the hogshead. The cellar was searched, but this simi)le stratagem saved him from capture. He eventually escaped by a canoe, landed at Fort Lee and joined the Americans by crossing the river farther up.- In 1778-79 the season was very inclement on the heights about King's Bridge and Fordham and but a small guar^ was kept. The condition of the people and the country must have been very bad. President Dwight, in his record of his travels, comments on the trepidation of the inhabitants who lived between the lines of the two armies: " They feared everybody they saw, and loved nobody." In conversation " answers were given to please the inquirer," or if they could not please, they tried by the answer "not to pro- voke." Fear was the only passion which animated them; the power of volition seemed to have deserted them; they were not civil, but obsequious, not oblig- 1" History of the Morgan Horses." This fact was brought to my at- tention by kindness of Edward F. de Lancey, Esq. 'Simcoe's "Historj of the Queen's Bangers. " ing but subservient ; their houses were scenes of deso- lation, furniture plundered or broken, the walls, floors and windows injured by violence and decay, cattle were gone and fences burnt ; the fields were covered with a rank growth of weeds and wild grass ; the world was motionless and silent, unless one of these unhappy creatures went on a rare visit to the house of a neighbor no less unhappy, or a scouting party alarmed them with expectations of new injuries and sufferings. The wheel-tracks were grown over and obliterated, and the venerable chaplain of a New England regiment, afterwards president of Yale Col- lege, said that their condition reminded him of the Song of Deborah: "In the days of Shamgar and Jael the highways were unoccupied and the travelers walked in the by-paths. The inhabitants of the vil- lages ceased, they ceased in Israel."^ Though this territory was in the hands of the enemy, its people and residents still hid their repre- sentation in what was then the County Legislature, or County Committee, as shown by the following in- teresting document : "King Street, February y« 12, 1777. " A Number of the Freeholders and Inhabitants of Westchester County having appeared at the Court House on the 16th April, 1776, in consequence of Notice given for that Purpose by the Committee of tlie said County, chose the Persons hereafter named to serve as a Committee for the said County from the •2'"> Monday in May, 1776, to the 2'"i Mon- day in May, 1777 — any twenty whereof to be a Quorum, viz' : "For Moi-rimnUi. " Lewis Morris, Jun' — 1. ' Thomas Hunt. Abraham Leggett. Israel Honeywell. John Oakley. ' For We»tcheater. Gilbert Oakley. Daniel White. John Smith— 7. " I do hereby certify that the above is a true Copy tjiken from the Records of the Committee of the County of Westcbester. " Edward Thomas, Clerk." * In the summer of 1777 Colonel Lord Cathcart was in command of the British out-posts stationed at King's Bridge and along the Fordham Ridge. Simcoe's Queen's Rangers,^ Emmerick's corps and Hovenden's, James' and Sandford's partisan corps were also stationed there. A chain of redoubts was constructed by the British on Fordham Ridge, at dis- tances just far enough apart to secure the flanks of a 3 Dwight's '• Travels, " iii. 491. * Calendar of Revolutionary Papers, vol. i. page 632. 5 The Queen's Rangers were originally raised in Connecticut and the- vicinity of New York by Colonel Rogers. They at one time mustered about four hundred meu, all Americans and Tories. Hardship and neg- lect had reduced their numbere. and, after several changes in command- ers, they were finally placed under the command of Captain J. G. Sim- coe, of the Fortieth British Regulars, about October, 1777, he being given the provincial rank of major. Sir Henry Clinton, in commenting on the gallantry of the corps, said, " The Queen's Rangers have killed or taken twice their own number." After the American War, Colonel Simcoe was appointed Lieutenant-Governor of Upper Canada, and in October, 179^ , he was promoted maiior-general, and became civil Gov- ernor and ■commander-in-chief of the Island |of San Domingo. October 3, 1798, he was promoted to be lieutenant-general, and died in 1806, at the age of fifty-four years. Though our enemy, his gallant deeds are- worthy of record. WESTCHESTER. 793 battalion. These redoubts can, many of them, be trt the people of the country. In the day-time the Brit- ish guards were advanced as far as the high ridge overlooking the Bronx, just above Williams' Bridge. At night only a picket line was left there. On one occasion a picket sergeant, belonging to the Queen's Rangers, in advancing the picket guard, was cap- tured by the Americans, who had crawled up behind the stone fence. As the sergeant had deserted Irom the American army, he was thrown into prison and threatened with death ; a threat that the British would kill the first six Americans they captured, in case the sergeant was put to death, alone saved his life and resulted in his ex- change. But the British occupancy was soon disputed by the Americans in greater force. In January, 1778, a large force of Americans were sent to attempt the cap- ture of King's Bridge and Fordham Heights. General Lincoln advanced down the Albany post road from Tar- rytown, Wooster and Parsons from New Rochelle and East Chester, and Scott took the centre road from White Plains, which debouches in the old road near the new reservoir just being constructed near Williams' Bridge. General Heath was in command of the whole expedi- tion. The calculation was that the three columns would reach King's Bridge about the same time. Lincoln was to halt at Van Cortlandt's, Scott at Valen- tine's Hill, near the present South Yonkers Station, and Wooster at the top of the Williams' Bridge Hill. Wooster struck the enemy's pickets first at the top of the Williams' Bridge Hill, and pushing on, drove the enemy from the redoubt on the Claflin, or Perot farm, and the British commander of the fort at King's Bridge was ordered to surrender. The redoubt on the Bai- ley place, which commanded the fort at King's Bridge from the south and rear, was also taken possession of by the Americans, and tire was opened on the fort at King's Bridge. It was determined to carry this fort by assault. The enemy cannonaded from the fort and killed one American as the guards were being relieved at the Negro Fort.' A plan to cut off the battalion in the fort at King's Bridge, by putting a strong force over Spuyten Duyvil Creek on the ice, was matured. A thousand men were detailed for the i)urpose, but the weather growing warm, it was deemed too hazard- ous to risk the men on the ice the next morning. There was a heavy cannonading kept up all day, and the enemy on the island were thrown into great con- fusion. Heath observing that the British, during the cannonade, took refuge behind the hill at the bridge on the Hudson River side, rode around in the after- noon to Tippit's Hill, which was in the rear of the British position, though on the Westchester shore, and concluded that a field-piece placed there would leave the enemy no hiding-place. This was near the present residence of Mr. Edsall, at Spuyten Duyvil. On January 21st llie artillery battle was continued on both sides, and Heatli succeeded in getting a field- piece to the summit of Tippit's Hill. Thus the enemy were cannonaded from the front and rear, and their I position made untenable. Some took refuge in the redoubt, while others lay flat under the bank, or bc- I took themselves to the cellars. In a short time the American artillerymen had swept the field clean and there was no object left for them to train their guns upon. The weather had grown very moderate. Ou the 22d a smart skirmish occurred near the fort, and Heath sent for a twenty-four-pounder and some how- itzers. On the 23d a lively fight took place just he- fore dusk in the broken groiuid near the south side of the fort, probably on the Dykman farm. An ensign and one man of the New York Militia were killed and five wounded ; the loss of the enemy was un known , as they were close to the fort. On the morning of the 25th the enemy made a sally in the direction of deLancey's Mills, where they surprised and routed the guard, 'wounding several, but neither killing or capturing any of them. A regiment near that place quitted their quarters. Em- boldened by their success, about ten o'clock in the morning the British made a powerful sally in the direction of Valentine's (Bailey place) and the Negro Fort (Claflin's place), instantly driving the guards and pickets away. The guards threw them- selves into the old redoubt near Williams' Bridge (the present site of the new reservoir on Michael Varian's farm), and the enemy took a posi- tion behind a stone wall to the southwest. Two regi- ments of the militia were formed in the road near Williams' house, which, according to the De Witt map, (vol. 4, Hist. Soc, No. 122.) was situated east of the Bronx, and the horses being hitched to the limbers of the field-pieces, Captain Bryant was ordered to cross the river by fording with his piece, and the militia was ordered to follow. Captain Bryant un- limbered his field-piece when he had reached the top of the Williams' Bridge hill, and to prevent his horses being killed, the men pulled the gun up the rest of > This was on the place of the late H. B. Clallin. 794 HISTOKY OF WESTCHESTEll COUNTY. the way with drag-ropes, but the steepness of the hill was such that the men were obliged to drag the gun almost within pistol-shot before they could depress it sufficiently to play upon the enemy. The moment this was done a round shot made a breach in the stone wall four or five feet wide. A second shot opened another and the enemy fled back to the fort. The American loss was two killed and a number wounded. On the 27th the brass twenty-four-pounder and the howitzer were brought up and ordered to open fire on the fort, but on the third discharge of the twenty-four-pounder it was dismounted by its own recoil. No shells had been sent with the howitzer. Heath attempted in every way to draw the enemy out of the fort by feint or otherwise. A detachment was sent down to Morrisania to light up a great num- ber of fires in the night, so as to make the British be- lieve that the Americans were in large force at that place with the design of crossing to New York Island at or near Harlem. To heighten this impression, sev- eral large boats were sent for and brought forward on carriages. The British guard on Montressor's (Ran- dall's) Island were so much alarmed that they set the buildings on fire and fled to New York. On the 29th a severe snow-storm threatened ; so Generals Heath, Lincoln, Wooster, Scott and Ten Broeck came to the unanimous conclusion that the troops should move back before the storm came on to places where they could be sheltered from the inclemency of the weather. As they possessed no artillery sufficient to batter the fort, and they were opposed to storming it with militia, and the principal object being to destroy or bring ofi" forage, which could be accomplished with- out opposing the men in the open field or scattering them about in houses, where they would be in danger of capture in detail — for these reasons the troops were ordered to retire as soon as it grew dusk. Lincoln's division marched to Dobbs Ferry and Tarrytown, Wooster's to New Rochelle and Scott's to White Plains. They were not safe in their quarters before the snow fell heavily. In 1779 Heath was again in command of the Amer- ican outposts, which continually raided Westchester township. In August of that year Sheldon's and Mor- gan's horse and the militia, with forty men of Glover's Continental brigade, made a raid in the neighborhood of Morrisania, captured some prisoners and cattle and were finally driven off' by the British. A few days afterwards the British, seeing the necessity of having strong defenses at the north end of Manhattan Island, built a fort on Laurel Hill, at the high point now the terminus of Tenth Avenue, and about this time also constructed Redoubt Number Eight, on theWestchester side, on the site of the present residence of Mr. Gustav Schwab, near Morris' Dock. Shortly after the build- ing of Fort Number Eight, I>ieut. Oakley, of the American army, took five prisoners and came very near capturing Colonel de Lancey, the leader of the Tory Westchester light horse, who was quartered at that time at the Archer house, which lay just under the guns of the fort. The old house is standing to- day and traces of Fort Number Eight are to be found on Mr. Schwab's lawn. The gallant Armand in the same year made a raid and captured Captain Cruger of Bearmore's corps. ' During 1780 the township was tliescene of constant military mananivres. In February of that year a body of British cavalry crossed the East River on the ice from Long Island to West- chester. Arnold also began to fit out a boat expedi- tion in Spuyten Duyvil Creek, which, however, was never carried out. De Lancey was making continual raids from Fordham and Morrisania on the adjoining country, and the Americans were constantly retaliat- ing, at one time having gone so far into the territory as to destroy a pontoon bridge which the enemy had thrown across the Harlem at Morrisania and carried ofl' large numbers of cattle.^ The last important military movement in West- chester township was Washington's grand reconnois- ance, in 1781, in company with Count Rochambeau and other French officers. It was part of his plan of wresting New York City from the British, or else forcing them to draw upon their troops in the South for the protection of the city. The French forces, which had landed at Newport, were marched across the country and joined Washington on the Hudson, and it was intended that both armies should move down the river to the vicinity of New York, and there, in conjunction with the fleet of De Grasse, undertake the capture of the city. The project miscarried because the British were more strongly re-enforced than had been anticipated ; but Lin- coln, who had come down from Tarrytown, suc- ceeded in getting his men into Fort Independence, just over the lower line. The enemy discovered him and an irregular skirmish ensued. De Lauzun, the French general, who was co-operating, was at that time at East Chester and heard the firing of the guns. His part of the programme was to surprise de Lancey at Morrisania, but finding that the enemy were on the alert he hastened to Lincoln's support, at Fort Inde- pendence. Washington, who, in the mean time, had the main body of the army under his command at Valentine's Hill (near the present depot of the New York City and Northern Railroad Company, at South Yonkers), also advanced. The British retreated by their boats across Harlem River. Washington determined that he would reconnoitre their works, at all events. On July 21st Lincoln and Chastellereux made a reconnoisance of the works to the north of New York Island. Some advanced by the old Albany road, some down the Saw-Mill Valley, and the third column by the East Chester road. Scam- mel's light infantry was in advance, to prevent in- telligence of the general movement spreading. Shel- 1 Heath's ■ ' Memoire, " 215, 223, 228. 2 Heath, 232. 'Heath's "Memoirs." WESTCHESTER. 795 don's cavalry and the Connecticut troops were to go to the eastward of Westchester township and scour Throgg's Neck ; his infantry and the Count De Lau- zun's lancers were to scour Morrisania. The main body arrived at Fort Independence at daybreak. The British on New York Island did not seem to know what was going on. While the troops kept the enemy in check, Washington and Kochambeau, accompanied by the engineers of their staffs and with an escort of dragoons, reconnoitred the British position. A map prepared by ^^'ashingtou's engineer, now at the His- torical Society Library in Second Avenue, with its pencil-marks and memoranda, brings the whole move- ment down almost to an eye-witness standpoint. They rode across country from the Hudson to the Sound. The British shelled them from several points, but the cortege proceeded leisurely on their business.' Nothing more of much moment seems to have oc- curred in Revolutionary times within the bounds of Westchester township. Soon the surrender at York- town and the treaty of peace with Great Britain en- abled the sturdy yeomen of Westchester to behold the last scene in this drama of war, when Washing- ton, with his escort, crossed Harlem River to witness the evacuation of New Y'ork by the British. HARLEM RIVER. The conveniences afforded by the Harlem River for navigation had much to do with the early settlement of the west side of Westchester County. It is an estu- ary of East River, which is itself an arm of the sea, and its southerly or main outlet and its communication eastwardly with Bronx Kills afforded the Dutch and English pioneers easy routes of water communication with New York and between the plantations and in- choate towns on the water front. As very many of the subjects both of the King and the Prince of Orange came from the coast towns of England and Holland, there were among them plenty of men who knew how to build, equip and sail a boat, and so they were scarcely warm in their new homes before their sloops and peri- augers stemmed the Harlem, and their white wings amazed the Indian aborigines. The sole obstacle to this land-locked navigation was the third outlet of the Harlem, — the dangerous Little Hell Gate, where the menacing black rocks and angry whirlpools obstructed the passage between Randall's and Ward's Islands. Prior to 1814 the river was navigated by small craft, but in that year Robert McComb obtained from the Legislature permission to throw dams across the stream at Eighth Avenue and King's Bridge, and in 1888 the New Y'ork water commissioners attempted to impose another obstacle to free navigation by carry- ing the Croton water over to the city reservoirs on a solid embankment. ^ The importance of the river led, 1 Irving'9 "Life of Washington," vol. iv., chap, xjcii. Putnam's Ikl., 1857. * Tho liistory of the proceedings wiiich leii to the removal of McConib's dam nud tho thwarting of tliis plan of the water commissioners will lie found in subsequent pages of this chapter. in 1827, to the formation of the Harlem River Canal Company, which, on April Kith of that year, was in- corporated to construct a canal from Spuyten Duyvil Creek to Harlem River, and to improve the navigation of tlie river so as to form a navigable channel from it to the East River. The enterprise was abandoned because the company thought there was no money in it. At various sessions in 183G, 1837 and 1838 the Common Council of the city of New York discussed the advisability of taking up in some shape the work that the company had drojiped, and received from Engineer George C. Schaeffier a report recommending improvements, substantially the same system as that proposed in recent years by the United States engineers. Although Mr. Schaeffer estimated the cost of the work at only eighty-six thousand dollars, the Council was timid about entering into it, and for eighteen years notliing was done, and the river re- mained closed to thorough navigation by McComb's Dam until the obstructions were removed by the force of public opinion and the action of the citizens in the neighborhood. In 18")"), at the request of the city authorities, the Legislature authorized the Governor to appoint a special commission to establish pier and bulkhead lines on Harlem River, and in 1858 this task was completed under the supervision of General Totten, United States army, Professor Bache of the Coast Survey, and Captain Davis, United States navy. In their report tliey laid emphatic stress upon the importance of the preservation of the navigation of ihe Harlem to accommodate the wants of the city and Westchester County. " The distance from Hud- son River to Hell Gate by this passage," they wrote, " is eight and a half miles. Its easy access from the Sound and moderately easy access from New York Harbor and its quiet interior, would seem to make it a desirable thoroughfare for vessels passing from Long Island Sound to the Hudson, and in certain cases even for those passing between New Y''ork Har- bor on the East River and the Hudson." This report was not fruitful of any results. On March 30, 1857, the State Legislature passed resolu- tions urging Congress to take measures to clear out tlie obstructions at the expense of the United States, to which no attention was paid. In 18(50 Engineer J. iSIcLeod Murphy surveyed the river, at the instance of the commissioners of New Y'ork County, and recom- mended a canal from Fordham Landing to Spuyten Duyvil Creek, as wsis outlined by Schaeffer nearly a quarter of a century previously, but he put the whole cost of the improvement up to one hundred and ninety-nine tliousand eight hundred and thirty- seven dollars. In 1863 the Hudson and Harlem River Canal Company was incor[)orated, and its engineer, Isaiic D. Coleman, reported in favor of one canal, on Schaeff'er's plan, and another, through the northern end of Randall's Island, following the course of Bronx Kills, so as to open a passage eastward for vessels coming through the Harlem by which they might 796 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. avoid the dangers of Hell Gate. The company twice procured an extension of its charter, but, as it never took any further steps, its grant became forfeited in 1870. In 1866 the commissioners of Central Park, who were then charged with the duty of improving the river and supervising the erection of bridges, made an elaborate report to the Common Council on the sub- ject. Andrew H. Green, then controller of the Park Department and afterwards of New York City, commenting upon it, said, '' It needs but a short look into the future to see this river busy with the craft that are to supply the thriving population on both its banks. As a water-way for commerce this estuary has the advantages of the Thames and the Seine." He pointed out that the improvements must be undertaken by public instead of private enterprise, and forecasted the course of legislation which has placed under governmental control the improvement of the river. As a consequence of this continual agitation and suggestion, Congress, in 1874, passed an act directing an examination and survey to be made, and in Feb- ruary, 1876, General Newton made a report favoring the establishment of an open water-route between the Hudson and the Sound by way of Spuyten Duyvil Creek, a cut through Dykman's meadows, and thence to the Harlem Kiver. He estimated the cost at three million three hundred and twenty-one thousand dollars. Proceedings for the acquisition of the right of way are nearly complete, and before long, in a few months, perhaps, the work of construction will be begun.* BRIDGES OVER HARLEM RIVER. King's Bridge. — In another part of this volume is noted the ferries at Harlem and 8i)uyten Duyvil kept by Johannes Verveelen. In 1712, Frederick Philipse, of Yonkers, was authorized to construct the present bridge at King's Bridge, and it was ever afterwards the principal passage to the mainland. Farmers' Bridge. — The origin of the Hadley or Farmers' or Dyckman's bridge is, to a certain extent, unknown. Perhaps it is the "causey" or "cause- way " mentioned in the early history of Fordham. It is said to have been in existence before the Revolu- tion. It is shown on many of the old military maps of the vicinity, published during 1776, and is sup- posed to have been built by the proprietors or people of the Manor of Fordham, to enable the inhabitants of that place to obtain more ready access to the city and save them a detour to get upon the State road, leading to Yonkers and Albany, via King's Bridge. It was for a century kept in order by the city au- thorities of New York, as the authorities in West- 1 The authorities for above : The various Reports alluded to in the author's possession, Proceedings by Common Council, Board of Alder- men, Acts of New York Legislature, Proceedings Commissioners of Cen- tral Park, and private memoranda. Thanks are due to Captain Tuomey, clerk nf th« Board of Aldermen of New York City, for valuable assist- ance, as many of the documents referred to are rar» and difficult to find. Chester County contended that as the whole of it was within the limits of New York County, it was the duty of the city corporation to keep it in repair.'' It is in contemplation by the city authorities to dis- continue this bridge and King's Bridge, and erect either a tunnel or one large bridge at the upper end of Manhattan Island, but as yet the plans for this change are not perfected. Between the Farmers' Bridge and the High Bridge commissioners are about erecting a new bridge, span- ning the stream and extending from Aqueduct Avenue on the Westchester shore to the Tenth Avenue on the Manhattan Island aide. This bridge is to be built in pursuance of the Laws of 1885, and is to be a masonry structure with an arch spanning the entire channel of the river, over one hundred feet above high water-mark. The contract is about to be let. The Croton Aqueduct or High Bridge. — The high bridge which crosses the Harlem River at the northwest corner of Morrisania was built as an aqueduct to convey the water of the Croton River to the reservoirs of New York City. It spans the Har- lem where that stream has a width of six hundred and twenty feet and its banks an elevation of one hundred feet. The original design of the engineers was to con- vey the conduit across the river by means of a stone embankment, broken by a high arch, through which the water would flow in a syphon, but the objections of the property-holders in the vicinity caused the bridge plan to be adopted. The aqueduct has tifteen arches, eight of which are on the river bottom. They are each eighty feet in width and one hundred feet high above flood tide. The seven shore arches have each fifty feet span. To reach the foundation of each pier a coffer-dam was built and pumped out until the sand bottom was excavated and the solid rock laid bare or a firm pile foundation prepared on which the ma- sonry was laid. Above the roof of the arches the huge iron pipes which carry the water are fixed on wooden sills, and above them is the foot-way of the bridge. As the elevation of the arches is less than that of the Croton Aqueduct, a system of syphons and gate houses receives the water at the east side and discharges it at the west. The aqueduct was in working order on July 4, 1842, but the bridge was not completed until six years and six months afterward. Its extreme height above the river surface is one hundred and fourteen feet, two inches. It is constructed of sound gneiss, equal in durability to granite. The cost of the aqueduct was $8,575,000, including purchases of land and extinguishment of riparian rights. This figure was within five per cent, of the estimates of Chief Engineer Jervis. To it, however, must be added $1,800,000, the cost of distributing pipes, the interest, the expense of placing the loans, etc., which bring the total up to $12,500,000.' - Proceedings of Board of Supervisors N. Y. Co., April, 1856. 3 Schrampke's account of the Croton Aqueduct. WESTCHESTKH. 797 The following inscription appears on the mason work of the structure : "AyvEDrCT Bkidoe. Fiiiishi il Doce.iiliiT 31", IS48. 1 I'liilij) Hone, Nalliaintil Weed, M. 0. Roberts, J. H. Ilobart Haws, A. C. Kiiigsland, John li. .lerviu, Cliiof, P. Hiistie, Itesiiieiit, E. H. Tracy, AssistanI, S Water Commissioners. J ■I. Vervaleii, Inspector of Masonry. Geoi^e Law, Samuel Roberts, Arnold Mason, 1 I [■ Coutractoi'S. On the gate-houses at either end is the inscription — " 1848." The bridge as originally constructed carried two iron pipes three feet in diameter, but in 1860 it was improved by adding a large pipe seven feet in diame- ter, which lies between the two smaller pipes. The side walls of the bridge were raised at the same time and the pipes were covered with a brick arch, on the top of which is a promenade, from which a view up and down the Harlem is obtained, which is one of the most attractive in the vicinity of New York. This improvement is commemorated by a bronze tablet let into the walls of the gate-houses on both the New York and Westchester sides of the river, reading as follows : ' The Improvement of this bridge by adding the large pipe, raising of the side walls and covering the whole work with an arch was com- menced October, 1860. The new pipe was put in operation December, 1861. The masonry completed in 18C3. " Oo(<«i Aiinnation from Isaac Michael Dyckman. of King'< Itridue. 798 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. constructed thai it would afford an unobstructed pas- sage for vessels. Public meetings were held,' the best legal talent retained, and money was raised to jjrotect the full navigation of the river. Lewis G. Morris, then quite a young man, was by the votes of his associates entrusted with the leader- ship of the fight. In order to bring the question, if necessary, within the jurisdiction of the United States Courts, it was determined that a vessel laden with a cargo from a neighboring State should ascend the river and demand passage way through the opening which the grant had directed should be kept for ves- sels, but which Macomb and his successors had ne- glected to provide. Mr. Morris therefore built a dock on his place about a mile north of the present site of High Bridge and chartered a periauger, called the " Nonpareil," with a cargo of coal on board consigned for delivery at Morris Dock. He arrived with his boat at the dam one evening at full tide and demand- ed of Feeks, the toll gatherer, that the draw or pas- sage-waj' be opened ; of course Feeks could not comply. Some flat boats which had been provided had on board a band of one hundred men ; and Feeks not opening the draw, Mr. Morris with his men forcibly removed a portion of the dam, so that the "Nonpareil " floated across. From that time a draw was always kept in the bridge, but for many years the passage was very difficult, the tide being so strong that it was only possible to pass at slack water. The Renwicks had succeeded the Macombs to the rights in th<:> dam. At first an attempt was made to indict Morris for disturbing the public i)eace, l)ut by the advice of the recorder and district attorney it was 1 The free navipration of theUarlein River h-i:l always been an import- ant question with the people of the southwestern sertion of Westchester County. On March :j, IS.'JS, the laml-owuers of the town of Westchester held a meeting at Christopher Walton's store, at Fordhani Cornere, and appointed a committee to memorialize the General Assembly in opposi- tion to the low bridge which it was proposed to build, without a draw, to convey the Croton water supply into New York City. The same com- mittee was instructed to ascertain the best method of removing the ob- structions in the river at Macomb's dam and Cole's bridge. The memorial stated that the signers had been informed that the water commissioners intended to carry the Oroton water across Harlem River by inverted sy phons built over an embankment of stone, filling up the whole of the natural channel, and with only one archway on the New York side only eighty feet in height, instead of by an aqued\ict bridge, which had al- ready been planned, one hundred and twenty-eight feet above the tide, with arches of eighty fi'et span disposed across the entire width of the river. The city of New York might by the low bridge plan save $509,71.'', the high bridge having been estimated to cost 8935,745, and the inverted syphon plan would cost but $426,027 ; but the memorialists claimed that their rights to the navigation of the river would by the hatter plan be totally destroyed. They showed that prior to the obstructions of Ma- comb's dam and Cole's bridge the Harlem was navigated to Berrian's Landing and that their ancestors and some of themselves had used the Harlem to ship tlieir produce to market. They also showed that at that early day surveys for the improvement of the navigation of the river had been made at the instance of the corporation of New York ; that Macomb had been guilty of violating his grant by not putting a draw in his dam, and asked the Legislature to compel the water com- missioners to direct such an erection across the river aswotild not impede navigation. Counsel were eniployed, wlio gave an opinion that the peo- ple had a right to remove the existing nuisances by force, and the result was Mr. Lewis G. Morris' forcible passage of McCoinb's dam, as else- where related in this chapter. determined he had a right to demand passage for his vessel. The Renwicks then brought suit in the Su- perior Court to recover from Morris the damages for his alleged trespass, but on the trial the judge charged the jury that the dam as built was a public nuisance and that any one had a right to abate it. An apjieal was then taken to the Supreme Court and there Mr. Justice Cowen held likewise. Not content with this decision, the Renwicks carried the, suit to the Court of Errors on appeal, where all the judgments below were affirmed. Chancellor Walworth wrote the opinion ; among other things he said : " The Harlem River is an arm of the sea and a public navigable river; it was a public nuisance to obstruct the navigation thereof with- out authority of law. The act of the Legislature did not authorize the obstruction of the navigation of the river in the manner in which it was done by the dam in question." He also held that no time runs against a public nuisance.'^ It is fair to Mr. Morris and his associates to state that this overt and bold act on their part has pre- served to the city the navigation of the stream, and largely to their efforts is due the fact that some years later the Croton water was brought into the city by the High Bridge and not over a low bridge without a draw, as was first contemplated. On the 3d of May, 1839, the Legislature passed an act directing the water commissioners to construct an aqueduct across the river, with arches and piers. The arches in the channel were to be eighty feet span, and one hun- dred feet in height above high water-mark to the under side of the arches at the crown, or they might carry the water across by a tunnel under the chan- nel of the river, the top of the tunnel not to be higher than the present bed of the channel.' Later on, by act of April 16, 1858, the Legislature di- rected the mayor and aldermen of New York and the su- pervisors of WestchesterCounty to erect and maintiiin a public free bridge across Harlem River from a point in the city near the terminus of Eighth Avenue to a point in Westchester County at or near the terminus of the Macomb's Dam road. This was the authority for building the present Central Bridge. Lewis G.Mor- ris and Charles Bathgate were appointed commissioners for the county. The commissioners were directed to remove the old Macomb's dam and the obstructions in the river caused by it and to see that the river was made navigable according to its natural capacity. The expense was limited to ten thousand dollars for each county, and of the share of Westchester County, one-third was taxed upon West Farms and Mor- risania and the residue upon the rest of the county. The cost proving much heavier than was anticipated, each county was authorized in 1859 to double its original appropriation, and in 1860 Westchester was - Renwick rs. Morris, 7 Hill, 575. 3 rii.ipter rc<-\viii. Laws l.'i.'in, page 293. WESTCHESTKU. 799 authorized to add anotlior ten thousiind dollars, New York at the same time contributing forty thousand dollars more. The commissioners paid to the Duncan P. Campbell estate, then the owner of the dam, piers and abutments of Macomb's dam, eighteen thousand dollars for all his property and rights, including the approaches to the bridge on each side of the river and his privilege of using the waters of the river. In 1861 the bridge was completed and thrown open to travel. It is in contemplation to remove this bridge and cross the river at this point by a tunnel underneath the stream.' The Madison Avenuk Bridgk. — Next in order is the bridge crossing the Harlem from the terminus of Madison Avenue to One Hundred and Thirty-eighth Street on the Westchester side. As early as October, 1874, the citizens on the West- chester shore petitioned to have a wooden pile-bridge built at that site. After several changes of plans an appropriation of one hundred thousand dollars was made. In June, 1877, a resolution was pa.ssed authoriz- ing the acquisition of the right of way for the ap- proaches to the bridge, and in 1878 the Board of Esti- mate authorized the issuing of bonds for building the bridge. Soundings were again made so as to determine tlie sites for the piers, but not until February, 1879, did General Greene, the engineer, submit plans and specifications as to soundings and cost. On October 15, 1879, John Beattie was awarded the contract for fifty-nine thousand four hundred and forty-four dol- lars. A. P. Boiler was called in as consulting engineer and made some suggestions as to change of plan. Beattie complained of the changes. On October 3, 1880, Eugene E. ^IcLean, engineer of construction, was relieved from duty, and E. B. Van Winkle, topo- graphical engineer of the Department of Parks, was placed in temporary charge. A change in the mason- work was again recommended in 1880 and the work was again delayed. Wm. J. McAlpine was then ap- pointed engineer of construction and A. P. Boiler was invited to consult with the board as to the iron superstructure. June 6, 1881, the contract for con- struction of approaches was awarded to John Mc- Quade for ninety-four thousand six hundred and twenty dollars. The whole cost of the bridge was four hundred and ninety-two thousand two hundred and ninety-five dollars. This bridge is now crossed by the Madison Avenue line of horse-cars operated by the Harlem Railroad Company. The Harlem or Third Avenue Brid(;e.— The Harlem Bridge, at the terminus of Third Avenue, was first authorized by an act of the Legislature passed March 31, 1790,- granting the > Acts above referred to nml Reports of Comniiseioners on flie in New York niitl VVestchcsler ("miiities. -March HI, ITyiP.— ("liaptiT xxxvii. of the laws of that year niithori/.e, jiage < Chapter Ixiii. Laws ITUT, page l.Vi (Robins' eilitiont. 800 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. In 1798 Coles was relieved from a part of his duty to keep the road in repair, and his additional toll cut down twenty-five per cent. ' This was undoubtedly occasioned by reason of the State having lent its aid to build a part of the road, for we find that in 1797, by an act passed for improving certain great roads in the State, the road from Coles' Bridge to East Chester was provided for, and a sum of money authorized to be paid on the order of a justice of the Supreme Court. The moneys for paying for this road were raised by a lottery which was authorized by the act. ^ In 1808 Coles and his associates prayed that they might be incorporated, and the Legislature passed an act incorporating the " Harlem Bridge Company." They were, by the act, compelled to keep the road leading from the bridge to East Chester in good re- pair. The following rates of toll were permitted to be collected : Every four-wheeled pleasure <;an'iage and liorses 3"^/^ ct8. Every two wlieeled pleasure carriage and horses 19 " Every pleasure sleigh and horses 19 " Every common wagon and horses ^'^3^ *' Every common sled and horses 12J/^ " Ox cart and oxen 12}-^ " Every one-horse cart and horse 9 " Ej'ery man and horse 9 " Every ox, cow^r steer 1 *' ETery dozen hogs, sheep or calves, and so in proportion for a greater or less number G *' For every foot passenger :i " State and United States troops, with their artillery, carriages and stores were to pass free of toll.^ Under the foregoing acts and grants Coles and his associates built the bridge, and although it was insuf- ficient for land travel and its draw so narrow as to seriously impede the navigation of the river, as late as 1855 his successors were endeavoring to have the charter renewed. In 1857 the Legislature passed an act reciting the fact that on April 1, 1858, it was to become a free bridge, to be maintained as such by the counties of New York and Westchester The mayor and street commissioners of New York City and the county judge and chairman of the West- chester Board of Supervisors were empowered to build a new bridge in their discretion and levy a tax for the cost. Judge William H. Robertson and Chairman Alsop H. Lockwood were the Westchester members of this commission, which, in June, 1860, appointed William H. McAlpine engineer of the work. He made plans for an iron draw-bridge on stone piers, at a cost of three hundred thousand dol- lars, and it was eventually built, although not until some changes had been made in the plan to better accommodate navigation. On July 14, 1886, the New York authorities awarded a contract to a Wil- mington, Del., company, for the construction of a 1 r,aH-8 1798, page 44S, f'liapter Ixxvi, (Loring Andrews' edition of the Laws). - Laws 1797 (Rollins' edition). '■' Laws ISOS*, page Id. new iron bridge at a cost of two million two hundred thousand dollars. The Harlem Bridge is crossed by the Fordham and West Farms Horse Railways. In addition to the above traveled bridges are the Hudson River Railroad Bridge, at the junction of Hudson River and Spuyten Duyvil Creek; the New York City and Northern Railroad Company's bridge, at the terminus of One Hundred and Fifty-fifth Street and Ninth Avenue, connecting with west-side system of elevated railways in New York (it was constructed in 1879-80 under authority of the Rapid Transit Act of 1875 and by permission and under the supervision of the Park Department;* the Fourth Avenue Harlem Railroad bridge, an iron structure ; * and the new iron bridge of the suburban Rapid Transit Company at the terminus of Second Avenue." In the early j^art of the century a bridge also crossed the Harlem, connecting Ward's Island with New York Island, but the bridge and its piers were removed many years ago. HKiHWAYS AXI) ROADS IN MORRISAXIA AND -WEST FARMS. By the Sautier surveys, printed in 1779 by Fadden, we find the town traversed by two principal highways. One came from Morrisania, opposite Harlem, and ran northeast to Westchester village, and then north to the present Farmers' Bridge, then called Dyckman's Bridge. From King's Bridge the highway ran at the foot of the Giles i)lace to the Boston and Albany road, a< at present, crossing the Bronx at Williams' Bridge. Another road led east from the Farmers' Bridge to the village of West Farms. From the Westchester town records, however, we find a record dated October 5, 1725, which relates to a highway "in the manor of Ffordham, beginning at the foot of the hill to the westward of the Bronx River near Peter Bussing's land and running thence along tlie side of the hill to the corner of Benjamin Archer's orchard, where it comes into the old road." This in all likelihood is the road leading from the present King's Bridge road near Judge Tappen's place at Fordham. Another road ordered in 1729 led from the King's road " to the landing below John Hunt's house, which landing was formerly known by the name of * X. p. Bollen was the engineer of this hridge and Smith & Ridley the contractors. It is the most graceful structure which spans the stream, excepting, perhaps, the High Bridge. Many of our readers will undoubtedly recall the old covered wooden structure which used to span the stream at this point with a way for foot-passengers as well as tlie railroad. ''This bridge was constructed under the same authority as the New York City and Northern Railroad bridge above mentioned. J. J. R. Croes was the engineer. By the efforts of the company, and especial- ly its president, Jlr. S. B. niley, of Woodstock, the people of the an- nexed district are insured of a speedy connection with the east-side system of elevateil railways in New York City. Much praise is due to >Ir. Filley for his unremitting efforts, in spite of great opposition, in ac- complishing the organization of his company and jiromoting rapid tr;Misit. WESTCHESTEK. 8U1 White Bank," and the people ou whose property it touched were authorized " to keep gates." It would seem that this must be a road leading from the high- way between Morrisania and West Farms to Hunt's Point. On November 15th of the same year a road was ordered to begin at the King's road in Fordham, and lead " nigh to the water side and landing; " and the same day provision was made for a road " begin- ning at the King's Road in Fordham, at the Corner of Peter Kens' field, and thence southerly until it comes to the abovesaid road leading to the Dutch meeting- house." The present Farmers' Bridge road dates back to June 6, 1730, when Commissioners Honeywell and Leggett, acting upon the complaint of the people of Fordham Manor, condemned the King's road " down the hill through the farm which Benjamin Archer now j possesseth," and laid it " through the enclosed field of j Archer to the eastward where the road now is cleared and beginneth at the Post road leading to King's Bridge at the corner of the fence near John Archer's orchard, and thence southerly until it comes to the road that leads through the farm which John Vermil- yca now possesseth on the Manor." June 13, 1730, an order was passed for a road from the King's road below the hill on P''ordham Manor to the highway leading to the Fordham Meeting-house. The meeting- house which was the old J)utch Church formerly stood at the junction of the Macomb's Dam road and the Berrian Landing road. It was mentioned that this thoroughfare was to pass by "Michael Odle's Still." A road to East Chester must have been in existence prior to 1733, as it is alluded to in the act of March 1st of that year, On April 9, 1733, the highway through Jonathan Lawrence's land down to West Farms was altered and laid " nigher the river, according to stakes set up and rocks marked." Wliat is now the road from Farmers' Bridge to the depot at King's Bridge was made under the following order in 1734 : " Upon a review of the loail from King's Bridge to Ilalstead's Bridge, we have made the following alteration, to wit : Beginning where sjiid road and the road from West Farms meet, we have laid out said road through the Widow Archer's laud as stakes are now set up to the old road, and then across said road to the Yonkers line, from which i)lace .lohn Archer, assisted by us, has himself agreed to and laid out the said r..iiil to run through liis land in the Yonkers as stakes are this day set Oil until it meets y« former or old road again, and then y« old road is continued as formerly." j The old Macomb's Dam road came under the care of the commissioners in 17<)8, their proceedings of, ilay 3d in that year being understood to have refer- ence to it. The transcript from the road-book of that date says, — i " ronimissioners, at recpiest of the freeholders and inhabiluut-s of that part of the Manor of Fordham lying upon Harlem Kiver to the { South of the Old Dutch Church, viewed the road as then used from the | publick road (laid out to the river by said church", beginning a little to the eastward of the said Dutch Church and thence running southerly as the said road runs to the landing at the back of the house now occu- pied by Charles Doughty on the patent to Turnenr ; and have at their retiiiesi now laid out the same road as and for a publick liighway, to be two rods vide, with privilege to hang gates on the same, provided they are kept in repair so as to swing with conveuiency and not otherways." The present cross-road from the JIacomb's Dam road toTremont is of recent date (say about 1845) and the road connecting the Macomb's Dam road with the King's Bridge road, near the present Dutch Re- formed Church, was opened about the same time. The writer can remember when no road led to West Farms from Trcmont, but a person desiring to drive- from Harlem River to West Farms was com- pelled to drive by way of Fordham. Fordham Avenue was merely a lane through Gouverneur Mor- ris' farm, which extended froju the old Quarry road near the Home for Incurables to Rae's Corners (the crossing of the Coles road at Jlill Brook at One Hun- dred and Fifty-sixth Street), and then the lane con- tinued south to Saint Ann's Church and Gouverneur Morris' gate, substantially by the route of St. Ann's Avenue as now laid out. Most of the cross-roads and some of the main ones of to-day were opened by land-owners lor the purpose of developing their property. The limits assigned to the author does not iiermit him to pursue this subject further. POLITICAL HISTORY OK THE TOWNSHIP, INCLUDING THE COLONIAL, RKVOLUTION.^RY' AND MODERN I>KRI0D8. Cornelis Steenwyck, one of the earliest proprietors in Westchester town, was a member of the Council of the province of New Netherland during the restora- tion of the Dutch rule, in KwS. We find Lewis Morris in the Council from 1084 to 1G85, and also James Graham. Richard Paxton, in 1089, was one of the Councilors of Lcisler, and Samuel Edsall, at one time owner of Bronxland, in 1690. Caleb Heathcote was also in the Council from 1(592 to 1697, and Robert Waters, of Westchester, served from 1698 to 1702, when he was suspended for taking the popular side. Caleb Heathcote served as Waters' successor from 1702 to 1720, and Waters was again in the Council from 1710 to 1731. He died in June, 1731. Lewis Morris was in the Council again from 1721 to 1729, in Caleb Heathcote's place, and the rival family of De Lancey, as successor of Heathcote, displaces Lewis Morris in the j)erson of James De Lancey, who served from 1729 to 1753. This distinguished man was Lieutenant-Governor of the province from 1753 to Sep- tember 3, 1755 ; also from June 3, 1757, to July 30, 1760. He returned to the Council from 1755 to 1700, when he died. Oliver De Lancey served in the Council from 176(1 to 17()6, and James, the son of James, was offered a seat in 17(;9, but declined it. Gouverneur Morris, a citizen of this township, was one of the members of tlie Council of Safety, which was appointed by the New York Assembly and sat from May 14 to Sept. 10, 1777, and from Oct. 8, 1777 to Se])t. 10, 1778. For many years Richard Morris, of Fordham, chief justice of the Supreme Court, served as a member of the Council of Revision. The townshij) has at various times furnished its quota of 802 HISTOilY OF WESTOHESTEll COUNTY. distinguished men to the State Senate. Lewis and Richard Morris served at the sessions of 1777-1778 ; Richard alone in 1778-1779; the two brothers again in 1780-1781; and Lewis in the fourth session down to July 1, 1781. He was returned in 1784-1787-1788- 1789 and 1790. Philip Livingston, who owned the Van Schaick place, on Throckmorton's Neck, was a State Senator in 1780-1790-1791 and 1792. Samuel Haight, from the old borough town, represented ihe district in 1799-1800; and Thomas Thomas in 1807- 1808. Then the old town furnished no Senator until 1868, when William Cauldwell, of Morrisania, was elected, and was returned in 1870. Caleb Heathcote was the first of the townsmen who filled a place on the bench of the County Court. He was appointed in 1695, and Samuel Purdy in 1752. In 1777 Lewis Morris was appointed, but the next year resigned in favor of his son-in-law, Robert Graham. Silas D. Giffbrd became a judge of the County Court November, 1871. March 18, 1715, Lewis Morris was made chief justice of the Supreme Court of the province, and on August 21, 1733, was succeeded by James Pe Lancey. Richard Morris was appointed chief justice of the Supreme Bench of the State October 23, 1779, and served until he was retired by reason of age. Abraham Tappen was elected to Supreme bench November 5, 1867, his term expiring January 1, 1876. The township has furnished three surrogates of the county. John Burton held the office from 1739 to 1754, inclusive, and Richard Hatfield entered upon the discharge of its duties March 23, 1778. On May 15, 1862, Silas D. Gifford was appointed sur- rogate by the Governor in place of Mr. Coles, de- ceased. Natural Characteristics, Residences, Etc.^ — The territory comprised within the limits of what was formerly the townships of West Farms and Morrisania, now Twenty-third and Twenty-fourth Wards, New York City, presents varied aspects of scenery. The rapid growth of the city of New York has already destroyed much of its natural beauty, and in a few years its appearance will be changed. A plain, old-fashioned country road is already the exception; macadamized avenues and in many places paved streets fill up the valleys and cut through the hills where formerly the green country lanes, shaded by beautiful trees, delighted the wayfarer. Still, there is much of natural beauty left, and the city authori- ties, in adopting plans of streets, roads and avenues through the townships now in the city limits, have shown good taste and judgment in abandoning the rectangular plan of streets so common in all modern municipalities and laid out the thoroughfares in accordance with the natural slope of the ground. The country is hilly, with broad valleys between, the direction of the hills running generally north and south. Along the ridge overlooking the picturesque Spuyten Duyvil and Harlem are to be found views which a resident of the great city would travel miles in foreign lands to visit. Owing to the windings of the stream and the irregular shape of Manhattan Island, vistas of Hudson's River and the straight line of the Palisades of New Jersey greet the eye looking westward, while at the base of the ridge the Harlem and Spuyten Duyvil lie in a deep valley, giving the appearance of a succession of lakes rather than one continuous stream. Historic associations, blended with natural beauties, tempts one who has known the territory all his life, in giving a description of its present appearance, to com- bine with it a short gossipy account of its present as well as former owners. Beginning at the northwest corner of what was West Farms, just south of the Yonkers line, we find a beautiful panoramic view of the Harlem and Spuyten Duyvil Creek. At one's feet lies King's Bridge or Paparinamin or Fordham, as we see by the colonial account of the region the present King's Bridge was formerly called ; just over the Yonkers line, on the site of the present residence of William O. Giles, stood Fort Independence, the last American work on the Westchester side aban- doned by the American army on Washington's re- treat to White Plains. Immediately south of the Giles place is still to be seen, just east of Sedgwick Avenue, the remains of an old powder magazine used by the British during the Revolution, and just east of the avenue stood the Negro Fort, now on the grounds of H. B. Claflin, which afterwards, with other works, formed a chain of redoubts and canton- ments and outworks for the British during the entire period of their occupancy of New York City during the Revolution. Another of these works is on the lawn of N. P. Bai- ley, which has been identified as the King's Battei y. On the grounds of H. W. T. Mali earthworks are also recognizable near the line of the New York City and Northern Railroad. The residence of Gustav Schwab stands upon the site of Fort Number 8. Immediately south of that fort, and in the valley just below the residence of ex-Mayor Franklin Edson, still stands an old stone farm-house which during the Revolution was occupied by one of the Archers, and the writer of this article remembers to have heard his grandfather give an account of his visit there when the fort on the hill was in the occupation of the British. Farther south and crossing a small stream which intersects the ridge at this point, soon to be the route of a thoroughfare called Burnside Avenue, one comes to the residence formerly of Mrs. Emma Dashwood, now owned by Timothy C. Eastman, and nearer the river, fronting on Sedgewick Avenue, is the residence of Gulian Ludlow Dashwood, clerk of St. James' Vestry, president of the Fordham Ridge Whist Club, and the bachelor factotum of the neighborhood. According to Burke's "Landed Gentry of England," Mr. Dashwood is Baron de Spencer in his own right, but, like a sensible man, he prefers his American WESTCHESTER. 803 Iriends and a competency in his native land to an empty title in a foreign one. Just south of the last place is Fairlawn, the beauti- ful residence of Hugh N. Camp. On the river side of the homestead stands the picturesque cottage of his son-in-law, Perry Williams. At some i)oint of the ridge near this place the batteries of the British troops were stationed, and under the cover of their fire the British flat-boats were able to descend the river and scale the heights of Laurel Hill, immediately opposite, when the attack was made on Fort Washington. From Mr. Williams' house the earthwork at Laurel Hill is discernible. Immediately opposite Mr. Camp's en- trance-gate, on the site now occupied by the embank- ment of the Croton Aqueduct, stood the residence of Richard Morris, colonial judge of Vice Admiralty, and afterwards second chief justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Mr. Lewis G. Mor- ris, who owns a part of the original farm of Judge Morris, occupies the adjoining place, Mount Fordham, inher- ited by his father, Robert Morris, from the chief justice. Still farther south on the same ridge are several beautiful residences. At the beginning of the century this tract was known as the Poole Farm, and John Poole, one of the original family, still occupies a portion of it. The most northerly of these places is High Cottage, belonging to the estate of the late Romanzo W. Montgomery, a wealthy merchant of New Orleans, though originally from the Eastern States. The view from High Cottage is one of the finest on the Ridge. Mrs. Lees, widow of the late James Lees, of the well-known firm of Lees & Wal- ker, now succeeded by Lindlaw & Company, occu- pies the next place, and the most southerly prop- erty on the former Poole Farm is Villa Boscobel, the residence of the late William B. Ogden, the first mayor of Chicago, and a railroad king of the West. During his later yean< he gave full rein to his refined taste and Villa Boscobel, with its beautiful grounds, green-houses, choice shrubberies, flowers and arbor- etums, is a fit monument to his taste and re6nement. He was also much interested in developing the neigh- boriiood. To his wise counsel and experience much is due for the present plan for laying out and improving the city suburbs, of which Villa Boscobel will for years form a notable feature. His widow keeps up the villa in a .style befitting its founder, and her kind deeds in this vicinity and in other communities give 1 additional lustre to the memory of one who has left '■ a precious trust in worthy hands. Just south of the Ogden estate is a pretty cottage I belonging to the estate of Mr. Ogden's sister, the late ! Mrs. Judge Wheeler, whose husband, Norman K. j Wheeler, was the first police magistrate appointed to serve in the annexed district after West Farms was annexed to New York City. Just south of the Wheeler and Ogden properties the stone aqueduct known as High Bridge crosses the Harlem. South of High Bridge, not far from the junction of Ogden Avenue and Woolfe Street, is a small stream which was ihe southern boundary of the Archer pat- ent, already mentioned. Crossing the stream, the lands in Daniel Turneur's patent are reached, and all south of the stream, bounded on the east by the Har- lem and on the west by Cromwell's Creek, was after- ward known as Devoe's Point — the Nuiisin of the Indians. Upon this southerly end of the back-bone of Westchester is situated the settlements of Cler- mont and Highbridgeville. Ogden Avenue passes along the ridge in a southerly direction, and after leaving the village passes between several very pretty residences. On the highest part of the ridge is Woody Crest, the residence of the late Mrs. An- derson, and somewhere near this place stood the house of Daniel Turneur, the original patentee. At the terminus of Ogden Avenue a junction is formed with it and Central or Jerome Avenue and Sedg- wick Avenues, and the Harlem River is crossed at this point by the Central Bridge or Macomb's Dam. Returning to the Yonkers line, and taking in all the territory lying between the summit of the ridge and the Harlem Railroad, are two valleys, one the head- waters of Cromwell's Creek, the other that of Mill Brook. Immediately at the Yonkers line are the lands of the American Jockey Club, formerly the Bathgate Farm. The property belongs to the cor- poration known as the Jerome Park Villa Site Im- provement Comj)any, but the American Jockey Club is the lessee. This club was formed soon after the close of the Civil War, for the purpose of improving thoroughbred stock, and conducting race meet- ings honestly, free from the rowdy and gam- bling element which had brought them into disre- pute. Leonard W. Jerome, William R. Travers and S. L. M. Barlow, of New York, John Hunter, of Westchester, and (Governor Oden Bowie, of Mary- land, were the leading spirits in establishing the organization. It at once raised the standard of racing in America, and from this Renaissance of the turf dates the present prosperity and good manage- ment of all our large race courses, and the increased interest in improving the breed of horses. It is a curious coincidence that " Eclipse," the celebrated American racer of former days, was for some time under the care and management of James Bathgate, the former owner of the present park of the Ameri- can Jockey Club. To the east of Jerome Park is the farm of Michael Varian, in whose family the lands on which the old stone house stands have been held for nearly, if not more than, a century. Upon the crest of the high ridge, overlooking the Bronx Valley to the eastward, stood an earthwork erected by General Heath in 1776, so as to command the crossing of the Bronx at Wil- liams' Bridge. This site has now been acquired by the city of New York for a reservoir, in which the waters 804 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of the Bronx River are to be stored and from which they will be distributed through the city. Still farther east, and at the northeast corner of what was formerly West Farms, is the small village of Williams' Bridge. The ancient highway which passes through this section east and west and descends the steep hill to the Bronx was the former road to Con- necticut and the other New England States, and be- fore the construction of Harlem Bridge was the only traveled route to New England. It is still known as the "Boston road," but should not be confounded with another highway farther to the eastward in Mor- risania, also called by the same name. In the valley to the east of the residence of Mr. Varian is the res- idence of Hon. W. W. Niles, a prominent lawyer in New York City, who has represented the district several times in the New York Legislature. He is a friend of Hon. Samuel .1. Tilden and is recog- nized as a leading man in the counsels of the De- mocracy. Returning to the west and the line of the aque- duct, south of the Jockey Club, stands the Dutch Reformed Church of the Manor of Fordham, and near by are the residences of H. B. Claflin and Wil- liam G. Dun, of the great dry-goods house of H. B. Claflin & Co. On the hill, to the east, is the old Briggs house, one of the land-marks of the neighborhood, and now celebrated on any race-day as the place of assemblage for the crowd who desire to witness the events without paying entrance-money at the gates. It has recently received the appropriate appellation of " Donnybrook Hill," and many scenes transpire there similar to those which are enacted at the his- toric fair in Ireland. Near by is the residence of Charles L. Cammann, of the old banking firm of Cam- mann & Co., whose wife, Cornelia de Lancey, belongs to the family of de Lancey, so closely identified with the history of the township. Next-door is the resi- dence of the Rev. D. Lawrence Jewett, whose wife. Miss Dickinson, was the daughter of the Rev, Dr. Dickinson, one of the oldest and most respected of the late residents of the townshi]), and on Central Avenue, not far from the last, is the residence of Frederick W Devoe. Farther down the Fordham and King's Bridge road is the residence of Hon. A. B. Tappen, ex-jus- tice of the Supreme Court of this State. The old Josiah Briggs homestead stands on the crown of the Fordham Ridge, and across the way is an humble cottage, the residence of the poet, Edgar Allen Poe, about the years 1843-45. It is said that while re- siding in this house he composed "The Raven." Near the present Central Avenue is the old Peter Valentine homestead farm-house, now much modern- ized by the " old squire's " son-in-law, the Hon. John B. Haskin. Mr. Haskin has filled many offices of trust and honor. He served at one time as chair- man of the Board of Supervisors, was jiresident of the Board of Education of School District No. 2, and represented the district in the House of Representa- tives. Just south of the Haskin property, extending east from the Croton Aqueduct to the valley of the Mill Brook, were the Butler, Berrian, Bassford and Fisher farms, now mostly cut up into village lots and fiist improving. Just west of Mr. Haskin's house, on the corner of Jerome and Croton Avenues, stands the church and rectory of St. James Parish, Fordham ; and east of the railroad is St. John's College, near which is St. Mary's, the Catholic parish church. On the rocky ridge on the west side of Mill Brook is the Methodist Episcopal Church and the old Bash- ford homestead, in recent years much improved by the late E. V. Welch. To the south are the growing villages of South Fordham, Mount Hope and Mount Eden, and, overlooking the village of Tremont, the House of Rest for Consumptives. The territory south of the King's Bridge road and as far south as the south boundary of the Woolf farm and the north boundary of the present Zborowski place was still in the Manor of Fordham, and at the beginning or early part of this century was divided up between the Butlers, Berrians, Archers, the easterly )iart of Judge Morris' farm, the Fishers, Weeks, Poole and Woolf families. The Woolfs were of Hessian origin, their ancestor, Anthony Woolf, hav- ing come to this country with the Hessian troops during the Revolution ; but taking a fancy to Amer- ica, he did not return, and settled on the Woolf farm on Cromwell's Creek, which, by his industry and fru- gality, he was enabled to purchase. The present owner of the property is now the lessee of the de Lancey or Lydig's Mills at West Farms. South of the Woolf and Weeks farms we strike the line of the old Manor of Morrisania. On the hills overlooking central Morrisania stands the hand- some residence of the late Martin Zborowski, who built it about 1855-56. The land came to him by his wife. Miss Anna Morris, a descendant of the original j)atentees. The house is very beautiful and the grounds about it well laid out and finely wooded. This place is soon to be taken in as a jiart of Cler- mont Park by the city of New York. Eliot Zborowski is the present owner. Adjoining the Zborowski place is a tract of land now called Inwood, formerly the property of Mrs. Julia Stebbins, nie Morris, a sister of Mrs. Zborowski, but the property has been sold off' into small lots and has lost its distinctive features. South of the Zborowski places and In- wood was the former Cromwell farm and that part of the Manor of Morrisania which fell to the share of James Morris, formerly sheriff' of New York City. The mansion-house is still standing and occupied by his son, William H. Morris. It commands a fine view of the Mill Brook Valley to the east and the now growing village of Morrisania. Much of this tract has been sold by Mr. Morris to the Astors and others. Bordering upon his lawn the Gentlemen's Driving WESTCHESTER. 805 Association have established a race track called Fleetwood. While Fordliara boasts of the American Jockey Club, Fleetwood is patronized by the lovers of that purely American institution, the trotter. Not far from the park Mr. Robert Bonner had his residence, and "Dexter," "Maud S." and other "flyers" are familiar with Fleetwood. It is a notable fact that before the Revolution a portion of the same ground was used as a race-track. The rest of the territory between Cromwell Creek and the Harlem Railroad is greatly subdivided. The creek is spanned by two bridges built by the town trustees of Morrisania during their existence. The whole of this region has been largely affected of late years by the opening and construction of Central or Jerome Avenue. This broad avenue, seventy-five feet wide, runs from the Central or Macomb's Dam bridge north, first through the Cromwell's Creek Valley and thence to the Woodlawn Cemetery gate in Yonkers. The old Macomb's Dam road was taken into the lower part of the avenue and the excavations and embankments have practically changed the surface. The avenue is the favorite resort for persons owning fast horses. The commissioners who were charged with the con- struction of the road thoughtfully planted shade trees at the sides and in a few years' time it will be one of the best shaded avenues in the city. Returning to Williams' Bridge, we find just at the foot of the hill, on the Bronx, the large estate of Peter Lorillard, which occupies most of the space between the Harlem Railroad and the Bronx, the estate being on both sides of the latter river. Saint John's Col- lege comes in at this point and just south of the col- lege grounds comes in the Powell farm. This prop- erty was owned in the early part of the century by the Bayard family, and the widow of Mr. Bayard married Reverend William Powell, rector of St. Peters Church at Westchester. In addition to his parochial duties, Dr. Powell kept a boys' school at Fordham, which, in its day was as famous as any of the present modern boarding schools for young men. The old house is still standing, but the property has been cut into lots and Dr. Powell's pupils would have great difficulty in recognizing their former play- grounds. South of the Powell farm, at the junction of three roads at Belmont, is located the Home for j Incurables, on the property formerly owned by Jacob j Lorillard, deceased. Going east, toward the village I of West Farms, we reach the fine brick mansion ' built by Captain Frederick Grote, and occupied by him for many years. Captain Grote served the town for some time as supervisor. West of Belmont is a large tract of land formerly belonging to the de Lanceys, but now owned by the Lydig estate. It extends east of the Bronx and has within its limits de Lnncey's ilill of revolutionary fame, but known for more than half a century as Lydig's Mills. The most beautiful part of the place is on the border of the Bronx, where a pond has been formed by the mill dam. It is in about the centre of this pond that the several boundary lines of the Archer, Westchester Borough and Jessup and Richardson's patents met.* Mr. David Lydig, an ex- tensive miller of his day, purchased the place in the early part of this century, and there established him- self in the old de Lancey house, which stood on the east side of the Bronx. The old house and the mill were burnt, and another house was built west of the Bronx which is still standing.'^ Mr. Lydig owned mills in the valley of the Genesee when that region was the grain-growing part of our country and later on he built the mill near West Point, on the Hudson, which was turned by the stream which forms the Buttermilk Falls. His son, the late Philip Lydig, who married a Miss Suydam (the daughter of another Genesee miller celebrated in his time), succeeded to his father's estate and lived there for many years. He was the father of the late Lieutenant-Colonel Philip Lydig, who served with distinction as assistant ad- jutant-general on the staff of General Ambrose Burn- side during the Civil War. His brother, David Lydig, resides part of the year at the family home- stead. This Mr. Lydig married a granddaughter of the late Vice-President and Governor, Daniel D. Tompkins, of Westchester County. One of the daughters married Hon. Charles P. Daily, chief jus- tice of the Court of Common Pleas in the city of New York. Another daughter married Hon. John R. Brady, one of the present justices of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, of which a portion of our townships form a part. The Lydig place, together with much of the land adjoining it on the north and east, will soon be condemned by the city authorities as a public park which is to be named Bronx Park. Just south of the Lydig place is the village of West Farms. This village, formerly known as de Lancey's Mills, owes its settlement to the location of the mills at that point, but prior to the building of the Harlem or Coles' Bridge its population was inconsiderable and the village of Westchester was the principal village of the township. The making of the Coles or Bos- ton road through the village placed it on the highway between New York and New England, and for several years the Bronx attracted many manufactories to it. ' The terminus of the Harlem Bridge and West Farms Horse Railroad and the depot of the Port Chester Branch of the New Haven Railroad just east of the Bronx renders it accessible. In the centre of the vil- lage stands the residence of Samuel M. Purdy, Esq., counselor-at-law, who on several occasions represent- ed the township as justice of the peace and member of Assembly. He at one time was elected to the lat- > Purgunnl iDformatioii given me by Andrew Findluy, the oldest and most experienced uurveyor of the neighborhood, sold iikerchanU of New Yorli. 3 Ita water was found to be particularly suitable for the prejiaratiou of textile fabrics. 806 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. ter office by the unanimous votes of his townsmen. James L. Wells, twice member of Assembly and since annexation twice alderman, also resides in the village, and here Daniel Mapes, a respected, public- spirited citizen, resided for many yeafs and kept the country store. ^ At the south end of the village is the tidy residence of Dr. Norman K. Freeman, one of the oldest practitioners of medicine and surgery in the district. The doctor was also much interested in former years in organizing a higher grade in the common schools in the township and has held many offices of a public nature. Along the line of the Southern Boulevard, southwest of the- village, stands the Vyse mansion, formerly erected by Thomas Rich- ardson, a wealthy Irish linen merchant, and at the junction of the Westchester road and Southern Boul- evard stood the Fox Mansion, this point being known, and still by old settlers spoken of, as " Fox's Corners." William Fox was a wealthy merchant of New York City. He married a daughter of William Leg- gett, of West Farms and Leggett's Point. He was of the Quaker persuasion, and the members of the Fox and Leggett families are buried in the old Quaker burying-ground at Westchester, just south of the Episcopal Church. He had several children,— Wil- liam, George, Mrs. Augustus Scliell and Mrs. Tucker. From him is descended the Tiffany family (who still own some of the original property) and Austin G. Fox, a rising lawyer of the New York bar, and Mrs. Rebecca Riggs, of the same city. To the east of Fox's Corners stands Brightside, the beautiful residence of Colonel R. M. Hoe, of the world-renowned firm of R. M. Hoe & Co., printing- press manufacturers. Since this work has been in press Mr. Hoe died in Europe. Though a poor boy, by the industry and mechanical skill of himself and his brothers, the firm increased its business to such an extent that it has its factories on both sides of the Atlantic. Most of the improvements made in the steam-presses of to-day are due to the careful study and knowledge of practi- cal mechanics which Colonel Hoe possessed. The colonel was also diligent in the affairs of his town- ship ; was one of the commissioners who constructed the Southern Boulevard, a promoter of the Morri- sania Steamboat Company and the Suburban Rapid Transit Company, and vestryman of St. Ann's Church at Morrisania. He was respected and be- loved by his fellow-townsmen. Near the southeast corner of the Westchester road and the Southern Boulevard stand the residences of tlie brothers Simpson, the well-known bankers ; and on Hunt's Point, to the east of Fox's Corners, are the former residences of the late Edward G. Faile, Paul N. Spofford, William Caswell and Francis Baretto. Edward G. Faile was one of the founders of the firm of Thomas Hall and Edward G. Faile & Co., grocc-s > Sketches of these gentlemen appear elsewhere. in New York. He settled at Hunt's Point about the middle of this century, erecting a handsome mansion and making great improvements on the farm. He was an extensive breeder and importer of Devonshire cattle, and at one time was president of the New York State Agricultural Society. He was a vestry- man of St. Ann's Church, Morrisania, and engaged in many works of charity and benevolence. He left surviving him, Thomas Hall Faile, Charles and Edward (merchants), Samuel (a farmer at White Plains), and Mrs. William Smith Brown. Paul N. Spofford was one of the founders of the firm of Spofford & Tileston, of New York, the well-known shipping merchants and man- agers of the Charleston and Savannah Line of steamers. He moved to Hunt's Point about 1830 and built the present house now standing on the Hunt's Point road. He left several children, among whom are General Paul Spofford, Gardner Spring Spofford, Joseph Spofford and Mrs. Thomas Pearsall. William Caswell, a member of the well-known grocery house of Wm. Caswell & Co., of New York City, married Miss Watson, a daughter of William Watson, of Westchester, {q. v.) Francis Barretto, a New York merchant, married a Miss Coster, daughter of John G. Coster, of New York, and settled at Hunt's Point many years ago. Mr. Barretto represented the township in the Board of Supervisors ; was also at one time a member of As- sembly. The view from Hunt's or Barretto's Point is one of the finest on the East River. It commands a view eastward of the entrance to Long Island Sound and to the south of Flushing Bay and the Long Island shore. On it is also the old family cemetery of the Hunts and in it repose the remains of Joseph Rodman Drake, the poet, the author of the famous poem to the American flag. It is said that Drake wrote those lines while having before him the pano- oramic view of the region now being described. On the stone over his remains are inscribed the im- mortal words, — " None knew him but to love him, None named him but to praise." During the author's last visit to this cemetery the tombstone was in disrepair. Some literary organiza- tion should see that Drake's last resting-place is prop- erly preserved. Southwest of Hunt's Point, and divided by theSack- wrahong Creek, is Leggett's Point, the most southerly and westerly part of the former Jessup and Richard- son's patent, and later on township of West Farms. Originally possessed by the Richardsons, by inter- marriages and purchases it finally came into the pos- session of the Leggetts, a respectable Quaker family, for more than a century identified with the history of West Farms. It was finally purchased by Benjamin Whitlock, of the formerly well-known firm of grocers, WESTCllESTKK. 807 B. M. & E. A. Whitlock, who greatly improved it ; later it fell into the hands of B. S. Arnold, a wealthy coffee merchant of New York, and now has become a pleasure resort. To the west of this point and along the line of the Southern Boulevard is thecoun- I try-seat of Mr. Samuel B. Wiiite, formerly owned by his lather-in-law, Mr. Dennison, an old and respected merchant of New York. I\Ir. White was at one time president of the Grocers' ]5ank in New York City, but has now retired. Near by is also the former resi- dence of Philip Uater. Mucli of this i)r()])erty has been cut up into city lots, but some of it still remains in the family's possession. Philip Dater, of New York, merchant, succeeded the firm of Philip Dater & Sons. Near Leggett's Point is the North Brothers' Island in the East River, now the property of the city of New York and formerly belonging to the township of Morrisania. On it the United States government has erected a light-house to warn vessels seeking a pas- sage through Hell Gate and the East River. Near by, on the main, is Port Morris, formerly known asStoney Island, the same having originally been separated from the main by a small creek or canal. Here is the terminus of the Port Morris Branch of the ^arlem Railroad, and off Port Morris is the deepest water in the vicinity of New York. The " Great Eastern" made her first anchorage here, having come in by way of Long Island Sound, her captain fearing that the bar at Sandy Hook would not admit of her entrance into the lower Bay of New York. Near by is Pot Rock, on which, during the Revolution, a British ship-of- war was sunk. A company has for years been seek- ing to find, by means of divers, some of the lost treas- ure, but with what success has not yet been revealed. Just west of Port Morris, and on the westerly side of the Southern Boulevard stands Rockwood, the beautiful residence of Samuel E. Lyon, Esq., a distinguished lawyer of New York and Westchester County. Mr. Lyon is of old Westchester County stock. He was born in East Chester and married the daughter of Jonathan Ward, for many years surrogate of the county. When quite a young man he distinguished himself by sustaining the will of Henry White, of Yon- kers, better known as Van Cortlandt, thereby saving to the Van Cortlandt family of the present day, at King's Bridge (see King's Bridge), the large estate now in the possession of the present proprietor, Augustus Van Cortlandt. He for years stood at the head of the Westchester bar. He resided at White Plains for several years. Cases of great importance, however, compelled him to abandon his Westchester home and take up his residence in the metropolis, where he has ever since enjoyed a lucrative and honorable prac- tice. Though several times offered a judicial posi- tion and political honors, Mr. Lyon has preferred the emoluments, honors and retirement of private prac- tice to public positions, and now, in his declining years, though as vigorous as ever, lie reaps the reward of his ability, industry and integrity. To him our townsmen are indebted for much sound advice and counsel. He served as one of the commissioners for the Morrisania survey ; wiis counselor for the Southern Boulevard commissioners and commissioners of the Central or Macomb's Dam bridge ; is entitled to the credit of having drafted the act for the annexation of West Farms, King's Bridge and Morrisania to the city of New York ; he drew the acts authorizing the im- provement of Harlem River by the Federal govern- ment, and has recently carried through the courts, to a successful issue, the preliminary work incident to acquiring the right of way for that important under- taking. Just south of Mr. Lyons is situated the residence of .fohn J. Crane, Esq., a respected merchant of New York, and one of the promoters of the Suburban Rapid Transit Company. Near by, to the west of Mr. Lyons, are a number of country-seats, fast being ab- sorbed into city lots, many of which will, in a short time, be absorbed into a new park, which the city is about to make, called St. Mary's Park, and in the im- mediate vicinity is old St. Ann's Church, described in another ehai)ter. Just on the banks of the Harlem Kills stands the house formerly of Gouverneur Morris, and not far distant, near the Port Chester Railroad depot, was the site of Bron.x's house, where, as we have already seen, the first treaty of peace with the Indians was signed. To return to Fordham and describe the valley of the Mill Brook, as it used to appear before the flourishing settlements, near the Harlem Railroad, ofTremont, Central Morrisania, Morrisania Station, Melrose and Mott Haven, would be a pleasing task ; but all their former beauties have departed, and suffice it to say that they are part and i)arcel of the great metropolis. One oasis of rural occupancy still exists at Central Morrisania. The Bathgate farm is still almost intact, and the old farm-house, with its barn-yard, orchard and other agrii ultural surround- ings, still remaining entire within ear-shot of the tink- ling of horse-car bells and the tooting of locomotive whistles. But the easterly portion of this property is soon to be taken by the city to form a new pleasure ground, which is called Crotona Park. The Bathgate family came to the township in the early part of the century from Scotland. One brother, Alexander, settled at Morrisania as foreman for Gouverneur Morris, and afterward i)urchased from his son the farm now situated at Central Morrisania. He left three sons and several daughters, — James, a doctor of medicine, and Alexander, a farmer, who occupy the old homestead on Fordliam Avenue, with their sister still unmarried. Charles, recent- ly deceased, who was at one time supervisor of the town. James, the other brother, resided at Ford- ham, and was a farmer. He owned the farm on which the Jerome Park Jockey Club is now located. He left four children, — Charles W., formerly supervisor; 808 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUxNTY. Maria (single), now residing witli her brother at Fordham ; Mrs. Myers ; and Mrs. Ardil B. Raymond, whose husband was for many years the miller at De \ Lancey's Mills, and town clerk of West Farms (Devoe). Three members of this family are, or have been residents of the township. They are of Huguenot origin. Frederick is the senior member of the large paint and oil firm of F. W. Devoe & Co., of New York City. His brother, Moses Devoe, resides on Fordham Ridge, on the Fordham Landing road, in the old Valentine homestead. He is a retired butcher of New York, but the family are of Westchester origin. Another brother, Colonel Thomas F. Devoe, has been for years inspector of markets in New York City, and a fourth brother, George W. Devoe, was supervisor of the township. This branch of the j family came from Yonkers. THE PRESENT TOWN OF WESTCHESTER SINCE THE REVOLUTION. Boundaries. — We have seen that though West- chester township at the time of Colve's interreg- num was erected into a town, it did not become a borough entitled to elect representatives to the General Assembly until 1686, when Governor Dongan confirmed the Nicolls patent to Quimby and others. It was still, however, in the North Riding of Yorkshire, attending the courts that were held on Long Island and contributing its quota, to that precinct. Morrisania in the mean time was a separate manor, and what are now known as West Farms and Fordham had their distinct courts under the Archer patent. In 1691 the county of Westchester was formed, and in 1696 Governor Fletcher granted to the inhabitants of Westchester town a charter erecting them into a borough town under the name and title of the Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of Westchester. * Colonel Caleb Heathcote, then a Councilor, and at that time erecting a mill at West- chester Creek, was appointed the first mayor, and William Barns, John Stuart, William Willett, Thomas Baxter, Josiah Stuart and John Bailey, gentlemen, were appointed the first aldermen. Israel Honeywell, Robert Hustis, Samuel Hustis, Samuel Ferris, Daniel Turneur and Miles Oakley were appointed assistant aldermen. The new oflicials were duly sworn in. Colonel Heathcote presented the town with its seal, and in the following year a town hall was erected. Though not mentioned in the charter as being within the bounds of the borough, the people of Fordham and West Farms seem to have borne allegiance to the rulings of the Mayor's Court of Westchester. 1 liber 6 of Patents, page 101. It is believed tbat tbe original patents granted to the town by Dongan and Fletcher were in the possession of the late Mr. Leggett, of West Farms. The writer's information is from a printed abstract, kindly furnished him by Edward F. de Lancey. He has also seen a full printed copy of the charter, in possession of Albion P. ^an, counselor at-law, New York City. The change from the borough existence under the colonial system to that of a town under the State government took place in 1785, when the town of Westchester was created by an act of the New York General Assembly. ^ Still there was some doubt as to the precise limits of the town, andin 1788 the Assembly defined the bounds as follows : "All that part of the County of Westchester bounded Easterly by the Sound and the land granted to Thomas Pell, called the Manor of Pel- bam ; Southerly by the Sound ; Westerly by the County of New York and Northerly by the Noith bounds of the Manor of Fordham and the north bounds of the land called the Borough Town of Westchester, in- cluding the islands in the Sound, lying Southward thereof and in tbe County of Westchester, excepting thereout the tract called Morrisania." By Chapter 279 of the Laws of 1846, passed May 13th and entitled "An Act to divide the town of Westchester, in the County of Westchester," all that part of the town of Westchester described agreeably to a map of that part of the town lying easterly of the Bronx River, made by Andrew Findlay, surveyor, was erected into a separate town and was to retain the name of "Westchester." The new town is described as follows and that description covers its present limits: "Beginning at a point in Long Island Sound where the Bronx Kiver enipties into the same ; thence running Northerly along the centre of the Bronx River, as the same now runs, until it comes to the boundary line, between Eastcbester and Westchester aforesaid ; thence running North- easterly along the said last-mentioned boundary line until it comes to Eastcbester bay, which separates the town of Pelham from the town of Westchester aforesaid ; thence running still Southeasterly, easterly. Southerly and westerly, winding and turning as the shore winds and turns, extending as far into Long Island Sound as the true boundary line of said town extends iintil it comes to the Bronx River aforesaid and place of Beginning. All the remaining part of the town of Westchester, as the same is now defined, shall be and hereby is erected into a new town to be named the town of West Farms." The unsettled claims and the privileges heretofore had by the people of the old town of Westchester under the "Old Charter" were directed to continue to be held and enjoyed by the inhabitants of each of the new towns of West Farms and Westchester. The town-meeting for Westchester was directed to be held at the house of Benjamin Fowler, in said town, on the first Monday in June, and for West Farms at the place where the last town-meeting was held. William H. Bowne was appointed moderator for the Westchester meeting and Ardil B. Raymond as moderator at the West Farms meeting. Government. — Formerly the borough of West- chester elected its supervisor at a diflTerent season of the year than the other towns of the county. In the Manor of Morrisania the steward was the supervisor, and whether Fordham had a separate supervisor the data 2 By Chapter Ixxii. of the Laws of 1785, the freeholders and inhabit- ants of Westchester were authorized to elect at their town-meeting six freeholders, for the purpose of having such trustees to order and dispose of all or any part of the undivided lands in the township as fully and amply as trustees have been used to do under any charter given hereto- fore to the inhabitants of said town. Power to lea.se a ferry across the East River from the township of Westchester to the township of Flush- ing was given the trustees. The district heretofore called and known by the style of the borough and town of Westchester was directed hereafter to be called and known as the town of Westchester. WESTCHKSTEK. S09 prior to 1788 do not show, but in tliat year Fordliam and the borough had but one sucli official between them. From 1773 we find James Ferris represent- ing the borough and Lewis Morris the manor, but from the opening of the Revolution down to 1784 Westchester, Fordham and Morrisania were not rep- resented in the board. In that year Thomas Hunt was supervisor and William Morris represented the Manor of Morrisania, which was a separate precinct and entitled to separate representation in the board. In 1785, Abraham Leggett re])resented the borough and Lewis Morris the manor, and in that year the tax on Morrisania was £1 lis. llcZ. and on Westchester £9 10s. 4d. Prior to 1786 the parish had supported the poor, and in that year. Lake Hunt being super- visor, provision was made for adjusting the accounts of the church wardens relative to support of the poor. In 1787 Israel Underbill represented the town in the County Board and continued as such until 1802. In 1791 Morrisania was deprived of representation and made a part of the town of Westchester. Westchester township was erected in 1788. The jail and court-house, which was formerly lo- cated at Westchester village, near the site of St. Peter's Church, was burned in 1790, and the super- visors of the county allowed the trustees of the village £70 therefor. In 1802 the number of ta.xable inhabit- ants was 185, and the total valuation of real and per- sonal property $696,822. Captains Ferris, of West- chester, and Berrian, of Fordham, commanded two town military companies. From 1802 till 1816 Ben- jamin Ferris was the supervisor; from 1816 to 1818 Basil J. Bartow succeeded him, but from 1819 to 1828 Ferris continued to represent the town. In the latter year the aggregate assessed value of property in the town had increased to $838,010, and the num- ber of taxable inhabitants to 229. Israel H. Watson was supervisor from 1829 to 1832, in which year Asiatic cholera prevailed in the township and the sum of $88.52 was expended by the Board of Health in suppressing the disease. In 1833-34 Augustus Huestace was both supervisor and justice of the peace; but in 1835 Israel H. Watson returned to the board. In that year William Barker, of Westchester, who for twenty-eight years had been clerk of the Board of Su- pervisors, resigned, and the board passed a vote of thanks for his faithful services. Watson continued to \ represent the town until 1839, when Andrew Findlay, | tiie well-known civil engineer and surveyor, succeeded him. Findlay continued toserve until 1846, with one exception in 1844, when Robert R. Morris, of West- chester, filled theoffice. In 1846 the Legislature passed an act dividing the township, all that portion of the ter- i ritory west of the Bronx being erected into the town- [ ship of West Farms, and that east of the Bronx con- j tinuing under the old name of Westchester. j The division of the township created a contest for the seat of supervisor. Both Findlay and Watson I claimed to be legally elected. It seems that when, on ' 74 the 13th of May, 1846, the act was passed, Mr. Find- lay claimed that he was duly elected at the regular town-meeting, which was held prior to the passage of the act, and Watson claimed that he was elected Ibr the new town of Westchester at an election held on the 30th of June, after the passage of the act. The supervisors decided in Mr. Findlay's favor ; so he be- came the last supervisor of the old town of West- chester and the first supervisor of West Farms. At the time of the division of the township the ag- gregate assessment amounted to $841,490 ; the number of taxable inhabitants was 442 and the population in both townships was about 5052. In 1847 Mr. Findlay was again supervisor; in 1848 Daniel J. Coster succeeded him. During that ses- sion Mr. Coster presented a complaint to the board, made by the Rev. Henry Duranquet, a priest of the Roman Catholic faith and a resident of Westchester, stating that the keeper of the county poor-house had refused to permit him to administer the sacrament to an inmate, on the ground that the priest's services were " idolatry " and that he ivis hslpinj souls to hell. The supervisors, at Mr. Coster's suggestion, pas-^ed a resolution recommending the superintendents, of the poor to remove the keeper. Mr. Coster served another term and was succeeded by Robert R. Morris, who continued in office till 1853, with the exception of the year 1850, when Bayard Clark served one term. In 1852 Mr. Morris was extended the courtesy of being the nominee of the board for chairman, but his party being in the minority, Robert H. Coles, of New Rochelle, was elected. In 1853, '57, '59, '60, '61 and '64 Abraham Hatfield represented the town. Denton Pearsall served in 1858. In 1862 Wm. H. Bowne was supervisor, and served another term in 1876. In 1870- 71 the office was filled by Patrick Hendricks, who served until succeeded by Hugh Lunny, in 1872. The subsequent supervisors have been F. C. Havemyer, (1874), J. M. Furman (1X75), Wm. H. Bowne (1876), Hugh Lunny (1877), Robert C. Wats^n (1878), James Henderson (1879), Peter Brigg^ (1882), James Henderson (1883), Daniel J. McGrory (1884), who was re-elected in 1885. In 1847, after the division, the number of taxable persons in Westchester town diminished to 215 and the assessment to $763,775. In 1850, although the taxables had increased only to 249 persons, the prop- erty valuation had risen to $2,079,799. In 1855 the taxables were 1265 in number and the assessed valuation $2,184,750. In 1870 the total population was 6015, and in 1880, 6789. RELIGIOUS DEXOMIXATIOXS. The Episcopal Church. — .\s the early settlers of Westchester town were Puritans, who had fled from England to find freedom of worship beyond the sea, it was their first care, after they were housed, to provide for religious services. We touch the first account of a congregation in the report ot the Dutch 810 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. commissioners, who, whea they visited Oostdorp, in 1656, witnessed a Sunday meeting, at whicli Mr. Baly said a prayer and Mr. Bassett read a sermon. The people had no regular minister until 1674, when Rev. Ezekiel Fogge officiated for them, and was in all probability the first clergyman who held services in the village. On February 11 and October 7, 1680, Morgan Jones performed baptism and the marriage ceremony, from which it must be supposed that he was a regular Congregational minister. On April 2, 1684, the justices and vestrymen of Westchester agreed with those of East Chester and Yonkers to accept Warliam Mather " as our minister for one whole year," and to pay him sixty pounds in country produce. On January 2, 1692, the people in meeting resolved that Colonel Heathcote or Captain William Barnes should procure them an orthodox minister, but it does not appear that either of them fulfilled the mission. By the act of Assembly of September 21, 1693, the parish of Westchester was set off to include the precincts of Westchester, East Chester, Yonkers and the Manor of Pelham, and was required, as were the other parishes, to call "a good, sufficient Pro- testant minister." The Westchester freeholders and inhabitants failed to take any steps in conformity with this statute until May 7, 169o, when they depu- tized Church Wardens Justice Barnes, Justice Hunt and Edward Waters to agree with Warham Mather for a settlement among them.' Pending Mather's acceptance, the town voted, May 5, 1696, to repair the old meeting-house, and on May 3, 1697, to build a town-house, which should also be used for public worship ; but as the General Assembly passed an act to aid the towns to build and repair their meeting-houses, the work on the town-house was 8topi)ed, and in 1700 a new parish church was erected under the supervision of Trustees Josiah Hunt, Edward Waters, Joseph Haviland, John Hunt, Joseph Bnyley and Richard Panton, who resolved that it should be twenty-eight feet square, with a "terret" on the top, and should cost forty pounds. Meanwhile, the struggle which occurred in all the other towns between the Puritans and the adherents of the Church of England, the latter being supported by the provincial government, was in progress in Westchester. The Puritans, who were in the popular majority, contended that under the act of 1693, which merely specified " a good sufficient Protestant min- ister," they had the right to call in a clergyman of I their own faith. The Church of England people held { that the Assembly meant to particularize ministers of the Established Church. It is not necessary to go 1 Warhiim Blather was born at Nortliampton, Mass , in 1666. and was the f;ranJson of Eicliard Slather, the famous non-conformist divine, wliose sons were Xatlianiel, Samuel, Increase and Eleazer, all of whom followed their father in the ministry. Eleazer was pastor of the church at Northampton, Mass., and married the daughter of Kev. Jolin Warham. Mis son, Warhani JIather, honyht land in Westchester from John Yeats, on May 2!l, Ki'JT, and sold them in 1703 to Daniel Clark. He died in 174."). into details of the controversy here, as they have been set forth in another chapter. It is sufficient to say that Colonel Caleb Heathcote, who had been chosen one of the church wardens, fought the Puritans on the point of installing the non-conformist Mather. The ultimate decision rested with Governor Fletcher, and he refused to induct Mather to the living. Mather preached in the parish for several years, how- ever, and quitted it in 1701 to remove to New Haven. The first regularly inducted rector of the parish was John Bartow, who waselectedby the vestry of 1701-2, of which the town members were William Willett, Thomas Hunt, Joseph Haviland, John Bayley, Rich- ard Ward, John Buckbee and Edward Collier. He came over from England in 1702 and was an ordained priest of the Anglican Church, having been vicar of Pampsford, Cambridgeshire. His first service in the Westchester Church was on December 6, 1702. He I had first been appointed to the parish of Rye, but Governor Cornbury had settled him at Westchester upon the petition of the all-powerful Heathcote. He appears to have been a hard-working pastor, for, in a letter to the secretary of the Society for the Propaga- tion of the Gospel, he commends his own conscien- tious discharge of his duty and informs him that he has " hardly ever missed to officiate on the Lord's Day " and has frequently ridden ten or twenty miles a day to visit the sick. His salary was always in ar- rears, but he managed to buy a house and five acres of land for one hundred pounds, and the town had [ granted twenty acres of glebe and three acres oi meadow within half a mile of the church, "which in time will be a convenient residence for the minister, j and also a small share in some undivided land, which ; will be to the quantity of about thirty acres more, but about four miles distant." In 1702-3 the church wardens were Col. James Graham and Justice Josiah Hunt and the vestry Thomas Baxter, Sr., Joseph Drake, John Archer, Thomas Pell, Joseph Haviland, Allies Oakley, Daniel Clark, Peter Le Roy, John Buckbee, Thomas Hunt, Sr., Edward Collier, clerk, and Erasmus Allen, mes- senger. They resolved, June 5, 1703, to raise £55 for the support of the minister and the maintenance of the poor, the share of Westchester town being £27 18.?., and of Morrisania £3 7s. In this year the church was threatened with dispossession of its lands by George Hadley, grandson of John Richardson, their original owner. Hadley claimed them as an in- heritance from his mother, the daughter of Richard- son, but the church replied that they had already been sold by Joseph Hadley, father of George, to one Thomas Williams and had escheated to the crown because of the latter dying intestate. Hadley failed to substantiate his title, and at meetings on August 3, 1703, November 3, 1703, and May 3, 1704, the trus- tees of the town confirmed these grants for parson- age lands, and further confirmation was had by the act of the General Assembly, August 4, 1705. In 1706 Mr. I AVESTCH ESTER. 811 Bartow suffered mucli discourageineiit. He wrote on August 14th to the secretary of the Gospel Society that his task of planting the Church of England " amongst prejudiced, jioor and irreligious people was greater than he could hear, and, to add to his j trouhles, the society in 1707 stopped the annual salary I of £50 which it had heen paying him in addition to his recei|)ts from the parish. Two years afterward he was much more cheerful and wrote about making "many proselytes to our holy religion, who are very constant and devout in their attendance on divine j service ; and those who were enemies at my first com- ing are now zealous professoi-s of the ordinances of ' our church." '< January 10. 1709, Joseph Hunt, Jr., and Jeremiah I Fowler were chosen wardens, and Miles Oakley, Thomas Baxter, Sr., and Thomas Hunt vestrymen for the town. It is a curious fact that the majority were dis.senters, of whom the minister wrote that " they will part with no money but barely what the Assembly has allowed for the maintenance of the ministers and poor;" but yet his congregation " rath- er increases both in hearers and communicants," and in 1709 lie baptized forty-two persons, and thirty-six the next year. In 1724 he had in his parish two hundred families, and the average attendance on af- ternoon services on Sunday was seventy, the morn- ing attendance being smaller. He died at West- chester in 1726, having firmly established his church and also a public school. The first schoolmaster was Charles Glover, who was appointed by the Gos- pel Propagation Society in 1713, he being " recom- mended under the character of a person sober and diligent, well aftected to the Church of England, and competently skilled in reading, writing, arithmetic, psalmody and the Latin tongue." The society paid him a salary of £18 annually. His successor was William Foster, who had the school when Bartow died. The next rector was Rev. Thomas Standard, whom the society sent over in 1725. Governor Burnett's mandate, inducting him to the Westchester parish was issued July 8, 1727. In his report of November 5, 1729, to the society, he relates that there are not above three or four families well all'ected to the Church of England, the majority of the people being t^uak- ers, but he had thirty communicants, and under the most favorable circumstances, in summer, one hun- dred attendants upon services. In the spring of 1735 he had some trouble with Schoolmaster Foster, who. in 1744, was superseded by Basil Bartow. In 1745 his church was "in a peaceable and growing | state." He died in 1760, and the jiarish was vacant until the appointment of Rev. John Milner, June 12, I 1761. In Governor Colden's letters of institution it is first oflicially spoken of as St. Peter's Church, the name which it still retains. Things had changed so much that on June 29, 1762, he was able to write to the society that there were no dissenters, except a few (Quakers, in his parish. A year later he wrote that the number of communicants had increased to fifty- three and that he had baptized eighty-seven persons since his arrival. On May 12, 1762, on petition of John Miller, John Bartow, J. Willett, Lewis Morris, Jr., Peter De I^ancey, N. Underhill, James Graham and James Van Cortlandt, they were incorporated, with the rest of the inhabitants of the town, in communion with the Church of England, by royal charter, as " The Rector and Inhabitants of the Borough Town of Westches- ter." By this instrument Isaac Willett and Nathan- iel Underhill, Sr., were appointed church wardens, and Peter De Lancey, .Tames CJraham, James Van Cortlandt, Lewis Morris, John Smith, Theophilus Bartow, Cornelius Willett and Thomas Hunt vestry- men. A house for the minister was purchased with a glebe of thirty acres not far from the church. Mr. Milner appointed Nathaniel Seabury schoolmaster, and was so successful in his ministrations that many families of Quakers joined his church. In 1765 he resigned because the vestry refused to refund him any of the money he had expended on the glebe, and in the fall of 1766, Rev. Samuel Seabury was settled as his successor. The latter found that the communi- cants had fallen to twenty-two in number, and that the general condition of church affairs was very un- satisfactory. He was a partisan of the crown and attributed to the growing spirit which culminated in the Revolution " unbounded licentiousness in man- ners and insecurity to private property." In April, 1775, he was one of the signers of the White Plains protest against "all unlawfuU Congresses and Com- mittees," and the pledge of royalty to the King. On November 22, 1775, a party of Connecticut troops carried him to New Haven, where he was imprisoned for a month. In September, 1776, he fled to the pro- tection of the royal troops on Long Island, abandon- ing his pulpit and his school, in which he had a fail' number of scholars. He kept, for the remainder of the war, under British protection, and in 1784 be- came the first bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church in this country. The church was utterly disorganized during the Revolution. On February 15, 17SS, it was recreated by a meeting of the citizens of Westchester town, who elected as trustees Henry Lewis Graham, Joseph Browne, Thomas Hunt, Israel Underhill, John Bartow, Philip I. Livingston and Samuel Bayard. Under the act of Assembly of April 6, 1784, they or- ganized as " The Corporation of the Protestant Epis- copal Church of St. Peter's, in the Town of West- chester," and the act of incorporation was duly acknowledged, April 19, 1788. On August 2, 1795, the parishioners assembled for the purpose of a second incorporation under the act of Assembly " for the re- lief of the Protestant Episcopal Church." The trus- tees of 1788 sold the old church to Sarah Ferris for £10, who removed it, and they sent around a sub- 812 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. scription paper to obtain money to build a new churcli on or near the site of the old one. They also obtained from the Gospel Propagation Society a grant from the legacy of St. George Talbot, and on January 26, 1789, contracted with John Odell to build a church for £336. On January 2, 1792, they chose as rector Rev. Theo- dosius Bartow, who was followed on January 20, 1794, by Rev. John Ireland. In 1795 they obtained from the trustees of the town a release for the site of the church and cemetery, and Israel Underbill and Philip I. Livingston were elected wardens, and John Bartow, Jr., Thomas Bartow, Oliver De Lancey, Warren De Lancey, Joseph Brown, Jonathan Fowler, Robert Heaton and Nicholas Bayard, vestrymen. Mr. Ireland served as rector until 1797, during which period the new church building was finished and consecrated. March 9, 1798, Rev. Isaac Wilkins succeeded him, and in 1806 reported forty communicants and eighteen baptisms. Rev. William Powell was elected his as- sistant July 12, 1829. Mr. Wilkins served until his death, February 5, 1830, and Mr. Powell was called to the rectorship. He died April 29, 1849, and was succeeded by his as- sistant. Rev. Charles D. Jackson. A new parsonage was built in 1850, and a new church in 1855, at a cost of sixty thousand dollars. This was burned to the ground January 9, 1877, during the incum- bency of Rev. Christopher B. W yatt, who succeeded Mr. Jackson, October 26, 1871. The present church was built upon the site of that destroyed by fire, which itself occupied a portion of the church erected in 1790. Near by is the parochial school-house, and adjacent to it the church-yard, which dates back to the settlement of the village. It has many mon- uments and stones erected to the memory of mem- bers of the Do Lancey, Bayard, Honeywell, Liv- ingston, Post, Doty, Hunt, Bartow, Baxter, Lewis Adee, Findlay, Tucker, Reed, Burnett, Ludlow, Timpson, Wilkins, Lorillard, Morris and other i)romi- nent families who are interred therein. The Friends. — The very numerous element of Friends among the early population of Westchester has been referred to in the preceding pages. It ap- pears, indeed, that they held religious services within the town almost or quite as soon as did the Puritans, and that the old meeting-house already spoken of as having fallen into decay in 1696 was built and used by them. There is a tradition that the first meeting of the Friends in America was held in Westchester, and that George Fox preached here in 1672. Monthly Meeting was appointed by the Yearly Meeting at Flushing, L. I., to be held at Westchester on the 9th day of Fourth Month, 1725. In 1723 the Friends built the meeting-house which is still standing south of St. Peter's Church, and is now in possession of the Hicksite branch ; nearly opposite stands the meeting house of the Orthodox Friends, which was erected in 1828. Methodist Episcopal Church. — On the 8th of October, 1808, the congregation of the Methodist Episcopal Church in the town of Westchester met in pursuance of the act to provide for the incorporation of religious societies, passed March 27, 1801, and elected the following trustees: William Johnston, Gilbert Lewis, Abraham Secord, Benjamin Morgan, Moses Hunt and Gilbert Shute. They assumed the name of the Zion Methodist Episcopal Church of the town of Westchester. Other articles of incorpora- tion, dated October 26, 1826, seem to have been filed with reference to this church, for on that day, at a meeting held in their place of worship, the congrega- tion elected John Westfield, Andrew C. Wheeler, Joseph Smith, Frederick Titus, John F. Fay and Isaac Lounsbury trustees. Zion Church became dissolved by reason of non- user, and therefore, to effect a re-incorporation, on February 7, 1835, the congregation assembled at the church near the village of Westchester, where they were accustomed to attend for divine worship, and elected Isaac Lounsbury, Thomas Bolton, Samuel R. Munn, William H. Lounsbury and Thomas J. Phil- lips trustees, and resolved that the society should be thereafter known as the Methodist Episcopal Church of Zion, in the town of Westchester. The church edifice was erected in 1818. Another Methodist Episcopal Church is situated at Olinville, and was known as Olin Chapel. It was in- corporated August 29, 1854, the first trustees being Smith H. Piatt, John Pratt, Alexander Ramsey, W. P. Janes, W. S. Dodge, Christopher Knauer and Gar- rett Burgess. On September 23, 1871, other articles of incorporation were filed, under the name of " The Olinville Methodist Episcopal Church." The tru.^i- tees then chosen were Charles C. Von Benschoten, Stephen Barker, Walter P. Jayne, Burton Bradley, William S. Dodge, W. W. Niles, John T. Briggs, Daniel Burgess and Levi H. Mace. The Presbyterian Church. — The First Presby- terian Church of Throgg's Neck stands at the top of a hill, just opposite the causeway crossing Westches- ter Creek, at the village of Westchester. It is not far from the site of the British batteries, which were erected on that hill. The congregation was incorpor- ated June 6,1855, and George S. Robbins, Edwin D. Morgan and .lames E. Ellis were its first trustees. Catholic Institutions — The Protectory, etc. — Within the limits of the town of Westchester, on its western border and near the Harlem and Port Chester Railroad Station, is the New York Catholic Pro- tectory. It grew out of the solicitude of a number of laymen and clergy of the church for the welfare of the street gamins of the great city. Projects previ- ously mooted by the Society of St. Vincent proved barren of results because of the lack of funds, but in the latter part of 1862 a meeting of prominent gentle- men in the parochial residence of the Church of the Annunciation, Manhattanville, then in charge of the late Rev. John Breen, resolved upon taking practical WKSTCHESTKll. 818 steps, and, as an earnest of their intentions, subscribeii , in sums of $5000, $2r)00 and $2000, enough money lo assure the financial success of the undertaking. Dr. Levi Siliiuian Ives, formerly Protestant Episcopal bishop of North Carolina, who was converted to Catholicity in 18o2, volunteered his services for the supervision and guidance of the institution. Rev. Brother Patrick, of the Order of Christian Brothers, tendered the services of that order for its immediate management, whereu[)on Archbishop Hughes gave his approval of the work and set upon it the seal of his official authoritv. On January 2, 1803, a number of the twenty-five gentlemen selected by the archbishop presented the " Articles of Organization of the Society for the Pro- tection of Destitute Ciiildren." February 11th another meeting was held at the residence of Rev. Monsignor Quinn, then rector of St. Peter's Church, New York City, who was participating most zealously in the project, and with whom for two years Dr. Ives was in daily consultation. At this meeting there were pres- ent Dr. Henry J. Anderson, Charles O'Conor, Charles M. Connelly, Eugene Plunkett, Dr. Donatien Binsse, Dr. L. S. Ives, Rev. William Quinn, Joseph Fisher, Daniel Devlin, John Mullen, Lewis J. White, John McMenomy, Florence Escalante, Eugene Kelly, Henry L. Hoguet and Edward C. Donnolly. These gentlemen discussed the fact that, year after year, thousands of Catholic children were lost to that faith through a system which ignored such a principle as religious rights in the helpless objects of its charity. A committee of seven was appointed to seek a charter from the Legislature, and on April 14th this was granted under the title of "The Society for the Protection of Destitute Roman Catholic chil- dren in the city of New York." The corporators were Felix Ingolsby, Charles A. Stetson, Eugene i Kelly, Charles M. Connelly, Daniel Devlin, Andrew < Carrigan, L. Silliman Ives, Edward C. Donnelly, i Edward Frith, Henry J. Anderson, Joseph Fisher, Eugene Plunkett, John McMenomy, Donatien Binsse, Lewis J. White, John O'Brien, John Milhau, Ber- nard Amend, John E. Devlin, Florencio Escalante, John O'Conor, Henry L. Hoguet, James Lynch, Frederick E. Gilbert and Daniel O'Conor. In the charter it was provided that the Protectory may take and receive into its care: "Children under the age of fourteen years, who, by consent in writing of their parents or guardians, may be entrusted to it for protection or refurniatiou. "Children between tlie ages of seven and fourteen years of age, who ! may be committed to the care of such corporation as idle, truant, vic- ious or homeless chiUireii, by order of any magistrate in the city "f New York empowereil by law to make committal of children for any such cause. " Children of the like age who may be transferred, at the option of the Commissioners of Public Charity and Correction of the city of New York, to such corporation. " The Society has i)ower to place the children in their care at suitable employments, and cause them to be instructed in suitable bnmclies of useful knowledge, to bind out the children, with their consent, as ap- prentices or servants during minority or any less period, to learn such proper tradei and cinployinent'* as shall be judged nuwt coudui'ive to their future beneflt and advantage ; and any pereon to whom any such child shall he bound sliall execute a Ixinil to the saiil corporation in a sufficient pi nal ainouni, conditioned for the goarents, . . . discharge the child from the said asylum, and restore it to such parents. . . . If. after a child shall have been properly committed, . . . any circumstances should occur that, in the juilgment of said corporation would render expedient and proper a discharge of such child from the asylum, having a due regard to the welfare of the child and the pur- poses of the asylum, the said corporation . . . may, at discretion, discharge the child from the said asylum ... on such reasonable conditions as the said corporation may deem right and proper. "This corporation shall be the guardian of every child, bound or held for service, by virtue and in pursuance of the provisions of this act . . . and it is hereby nmde its special duty to inquire into the treatment of every such child, and icdress any grievonce in manner prescribed by law." An appsal for financial aid met with generous re- sponse, and the Protectory began its career of useful- ness in two private dwellings in Thirty-sixth and Thirty-seventh Streets, near Second Avenue, where, under the pastoral care of Rev. Father Clowry, who attended to their spiritual wants, the boys found their first home and shelter. The Christian ' Brothers as- sumed charge. Notice of these partial arrangements had only time to reach the poor, or the benefactors of the poor, ■ Rev. B. L. Pierce, chaplain of the House of Refuge, in his book en- titled " Half a Century with Juvenile Delinquents," makes the following statement : "The officers of the Boys' Protectory l>elong to the onler of Christian Itrothei-s. They give thernselves to the Church when they take the vow of the order, to be teachers wherever they nmy be ajipointed to labor. They will never be priests ; they are expected to pursue no form of bus ines,s hereafter, but for life will remain in the office of instructors. Their salaries are simply the requisite provision for their living, sick well. These men are constantly with the boys In school, work, recreation and in the ilorniitory 814 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. when applications in behalf of unprotected children became so numerous and pressing as to compel the executive committee, in view of their necessarily limited means and accommodations, to restrict the number of inmates to such boys as might be commit- ted from the courts or transferred to their care by the "Commissioners of Public Charities and Correction." Hence the records of their office show that, but for the want of sufficient room, at least double the num- ber which they now report might be enjoying the blessing of the institution. Owing to the difficulty of renting suitable build- ings, the committee were unable to make provision for the reception of girls before the 1st of October. About that time, however, they succeeded in pro- curing a building at the corner of Eighty-sixth Street and Second Avenue, well suited to the purpose. This they were enabled to place under the direction of the Sisters of Charity, a religious order whose members, by their noble and generous self-devotion, in the care of the sick, forlorn, the destitute and helpless in every form, age and condition in life, have been the theme of praise in story and song in every clime and tongue, and from persons of all shades of belief, race and religion. The houses in Thirty-sixth and Thirty-seventh Streets were soon found to be inadequate for the ac- commodations of the daily increasing numbers, and the managers, were within eight months of the day of opening, forced to seek other and more commodious quarters. Two buildings were then rented in Eighty- Sixth Street, near Fifth Avenue, and so soon as con- venient the boys moved into them. The difficulties experienced in providing accommo- dation, in obtaining the considerable suras necessary in the inauguration of so vast a work, were but a minor portion of the onerous task placed upon the managers' shoulders. The far more difficult problem of " what to do with the abandoned child,"' and " how to do it " had now to be directly solved. Most of the children received, particularly during the first few years, were the victims of indolent or vicious habits. Experience taught that, to succeed in this work of reformation, constant occupation, pleasantly diversified, was essential, and space for play-grounds, out-door labor, and places wherein trades could be learned was required. In the earliest reports of the Protectory we find, — "Id the course office months, in the shoe department, where 'ii boys are employed, there has been expended the sum of J1737.12, including . machinery, material and instruction, with the result of 82107.2G products, which nets us a profit of 8460.14 and the machinery. In the tailoring department the training of the boys requires more time, and hence a less expeditious profit." While the New York Catholic Protectory thus pur- sued its mission, each day's experience more fully proved the necessity of moving out of the city. Apart from the fact that it was impossible to secure suffi- cient accommodation in the heart of a great metrop- olis, the managers became daily more convinced that the influence of the surroundings in a vast city like New York was against their work. The problem which then propounded itself was to secure " proper location elsewhere." In the minutes of one of the regular meetings held at this time the president said, — "In view of the circumstances, and in firm conviction of the prosper- ity, if not the very existence, of our institution, depends upon the im- mediate erection of a building somewhere, eveiy exertion possible has been made by the E.\ecutive Committee to discover a suitable place for this pui-pose. We have visited all the islands in East River and fmmd in them all some fatal objections. AVe then turned our attention to the mainland, and could discover nothing within the limits of the city which seemed to promise any better accommodations. After consult- ing our legal adviser we felt gratified in looking beyond these limits. An advertisement of the sale of a farm, near the village of Westchester, induced us to visit and examine it in respect to its suitableness to meet our object in view. Foiir members of the Executive Committee, — Dr. Anderson, Mr. Hoguet, Mr. White and the President, — with the Most Kev. Archbishop, the Advisory Chaplain and a number of the clergy, have visited the farm, and, after a thorough examination, have unanimously come to the conclusion, taking everything into consideration, that we are not likely to secure a more favorable site for our institution. Your President, therefore, afti-r making himself master of the facts relating to this property and to tlie terms of sale, recommends its purchase by the Managers." It will be remarked that thus far the managers of the New Y'ork Catholic Protectory have relied chiefly upon private generosity to sustain the work. But, beginning with 1864, we find that the State and other authorities recognized the work as of public utility, and assisted it accordingly. It has already been remarked that want of proper space and accommodation alone prevented the ac- complishment of the full measure of success which the managers hoped to attain. It was, therefore, with no little satisfaction that they announced the purchase, on the 9th day of June, 1865, of a valuable farm of about one hundred and fourteen acres, with commodious barns and out- houses, near the village of Westchester, for forty tliou- sand dollars, upon which they have completed a spacious brick building, designed to accommodate from six hundred to eight hundred destitute boys, and another of equal dimensions for the accommoda- tion of girls. St. Raymond's Catholic Church is located on the road leading from Westchester to West Farms, and is not distant from the Protectory. Attached to it is an extensive cemetery and a fine, large parochial school- house. It has a numerous congregation. Highways, Bridges, Etc. — From the Sautier Survej's (Doc. Hist, of N. Y.), printed in London by Fadden in 1779, we find a main highway running from Morrisania via de Lancey's Mills (West Farms) to the village of Westchester, but by an entry on the 13th day of the Ninth Month, 1722, in the county road-book, on file in the office of the county clerk, it appears that on June 8th of that year Commissioners Lewis Morris, Jr., John Stephenson, Joseph Drake and John Hoit made return that they had laid out a public road in the town of Westchester, — WESTCHESTER. SI 5 " From tlie bridge tlial lies iiciiis- tlio broolv tluit runs In lwcfu L'nJer- hill Biinis's land and runs westerly as the way lias usually been run, four rods wide between said Barns's land, incluiling the watering place lying by y« side of I'nderbill Barns's home lot, according to the bounds now sett up and marked, till it meets w"" a public road laid out by the Coni- utissioncrs through the sheep pasture." The road through the sheep pasture was probably the one which was discontinued in 1727. It began at the " Northerly corner of the (Quaker meeting-house," and after passing through "ye common land" and skirting the proi)erties of Petor Ferris, the Widow Colyer and John Maphis, terminated at " the town landing by the Mill." In 1723 a road was run "from the corner of John Huestis' garden" to the country road " by the house that John Packer lives in." In 1726 a road was built to " Jethamar Polton's saw-mill upon iJrunck's River ; " and on July 20, 1727, the highway '■ from the road y' goes to Brunx's River, where Joseph Hallstead now lives, from the causeway by Col. Heath- cote's Mill, between the land then of Israel Honey- well, Senr., since deceased, and the land of Thomas Hadden to the said Ferris' land," was ordered to be closed. November 21, 1728, the commissioners re- viewed a highway " from Joseph Hallstead's land southerly, to be an open road; he (the said Hall- stead) to build a good stout bridge over the low ground against the house where Abigail Reed liveth, at his own cost." April 10, 1729, they closed the road "already laid out through y" Frog's (Throgg's) Neck," but in 1731 revoked their action, and the high- way was again established from the ferry through Augustine Baxter's land. The road mentioned as laid out in 1727 is undoubl- t'dly the old road which ran from the present West- chester Bridge to the old bridge next south of the I mill at West Farms. The road of 1729 is undoubt- edly the i)resent highway leading to Fort Schuyler through Throgg's Neck, but we find it again laid out in 1737 in order to avoid some difficulties occasioned by Peter Baxter's fence. The present road from Westchester Bridge to Pelham Bridge was authorized as follows: In 1X17, Hermann Le Roy, Thomas C. Taylor, Wil- liam Edgar and their associates were incorporated as a turnpike company to make a turnpike road begin- ning at the causeway leading from the village of Westchester, at some point on the east side of the bridge over Westchester Creek, and to run from thence in the most convenient route to the bridge lately erected over the mouth of East Chester Creek and were to be known as the "Westchester and Pelham Turnpike Road Company." The Boulevard running from Pelham Bridge to the bridge south of the West ^besti r village causeway is of recent origin, hut the road wliich runs from West- cheater village to the Bronx at the south end of the village of West Farms was originally known as the Westchester turnpike. The road known now as the East Chester road, extending from the Bleach to the East Chester line, and sometimes called the Boston road, is a coniinuaiiou of the Coles road mentioned in the chapters on West Farms and Morrisania. Bkiugjos IX THE TowxsHii'.— William's Bridge, the most northerly of the bridges in the township which cross the Bronx, has already been mentioned in our colonial account. The next bridge south of it at the Bleach was constructed when Pelham Avenue was authorized by the Laws of 18()4 and 1860. The bridge at Lydig's Mills was built probably about the time the road from Westchester to the mill was constructed, though a wading-place existed there after the construction of the dam. The other bridges over the Bronx were constructed in comparatively late years ; that in the centre of the village when the road from Tremont to Westchester was opened. All the bridges over the Bronx are now maintained at the joint expense of the township and the city of New York. Pelham Bridge, which crosses East Chester Creek at ihc head of East Chester or Pelham Bay, was au- thorized as follows : By a legislative act of March 16, 1812, Herman Le Roy, James Harvey, William Bayard, John Bartow, Richard Ward, Elbert Roosevelt, Daniel Pelton, Joshua Eustace and John Hunter were incorporated as the East Chester Bridge Company, and authorized to build a toll-bridge from the farm of James Harvey, in the town of Pelham, to the point of Throgg's Neck called Dormer's Island. \Vithin a few years a storm destroyed the bridge, and on April 12, 1816, the General Assembly empowered the company to sell ts property and franchises at public auction, the purchaser to be- come the owner of the franchise for forty-five years. Nothing seems to have been accomplished under this act, and in 1834 George Rapelje was authorized to build a bridge over East Chester Creek "at the point where the bridge formerly stood." If the draw per- mitted free navigation, and the Common Pleasjudges of the county were satisfied with the structure, it be- ing made their duty to inspect it, Rapelje was al- lowed to collect tolls upon traffic. His grant was to run thirty years, but in 1860 the supervisors of Westchester County were directed by an act of the Legislature to purchase this Rapclje"s or Pelham Bridge and make it free, which they promptly did. Dormer's Island, mentioned above, is the present hummock or high land since known as Taylor's Island, and now occupied by General Ellis and others. Characterisths and Pretext Occupant.*. — The township is a well-wooded, park-like country, interspersed with thriving settlements, and at ihe extreme eastern limit the Eitst River expands into the broad Long Island Sound, indented on the West- chester shore with numerous bays and inlets washing the feet of commanding eminences, from which combined views of inland and marine scenery are to be obtained unsurpassed in any other part of this 816 HlSTOliY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. beautiful State. It seems to have been designed by nature to form a fitting suburb to the great city which ' adjoins it. ; On its extreme eastern limit on Throgg's Point, at the commencement of Long Island Sound, is Fort ; Schuyler and the United States government light- house. The fort was erected about the middle of this century, and, in connection with the batteries on the Long Island shore, protects the entrance into New York Harbor by the East River. Hammond's Point, near by, now owned by the estate of the late F. C. Havemeyer, a well-known merchant, and at one time supervisor, commands one of the finest views on Long Island Sound. Near by the bay is Pennyfield, the residence of the widow of the late George T. Adee, a respected citizen, and oue of the members of the old ' family of Adee, long settled in the township. Mr. ^ Adee was lor many years identified with some of the ! largest financial institutions in New Y'ork. He was a director of the Equitable Life In>.urance Company, and for a long time vice-president of the Bank of ! Commerce. Near by are the Dominick Lynch, Fran- cis Morris and Van Schaick places, all now the prop- ' erty of the Havemeyer family and Mr. John Morris. Mr. John Morris is the son of the late Mr. Francis Morris, an English gentleman who came to this country many years ago, and who, besides being prosperous in business, was a successful breeder of the thoroughbred race-horse. In the immediate vicinity, fronting on Pelham Bay, is the residence j of Miss Catharine Lorillard Woolfe, whose power to do good to her fellow-creatures is only surpassed by her judgment, discretion and generosity. The grounds are adorned with rare shade-trees, green- , houses and graperies, and, though rarely at the pat- I ernal mansion, the town claims her as a towns- ; woman, and finds in her a worthy successor to her ' father, the late John David Woolfe. ' On the Neck road is also the Van Schaick home- stead, whose owners some years since left by his will a sum of money to found a free library and reading- room for the township. This building is on the road near the Episcopal Church in the village. Driving towards the village on the Neck road, one passes the old Carter mansion, the Turnbull place and the Cem- etery of St. Raymond (Roman Catholic), and near by is the former residence of William H. Bowne, now deceased, who, with his family, have for generations been identified with the town. On Ferris' Neck and Zerega's Point are the residences of Mr. Ferris, whose family owned the land for generations, Mr. Zerega and Jacob Lorillard. And near by, next to the Pres- byterian Church, is the celebrated boys' school, kept by Mr. Thomas Harrington, at which he is now teach- ing the sons of his former pupils. On the road to Pelham, before crossing the old causeway, stands the former residence of the late Mr. Syndey B. Bowne, a worthy and respected Quaker, resident of the town- ship, whose son Thomas has succeeded him and his brother William in the management of the old coun- try store in the village, known throughout the coun- ty still as "Sydney Bovvne's." This store is and probably was the best sample of a country store ever known. Sydney always had everything which was asked for. Once on a wager some gentlemen asked for some goose-yokes, rather a rare commodity. Sydney furnished the article on the spot. Another bet was then made that he could not furnish a pulpit. For a moment the venerable Quaker was at a loss, but sud- denly, recalling the contents of the garret, he ex- claimed, "Thomas, thee will find Parson Wilkins' old pulpit behind the chimney in the garret." It seems that when the church was renovated, Mr. Bowne had bought the old pulpit. On the north side of the neck at Pelham Bridge are the neat cottages of Mr. Pierre Lorrillard, Jr., Kent, Gouverneur Morris, Jr., and the beautiful resi- dence of General Ellis. The general, after an adven- turous life in California, among other public trusts, having been adjutant-general of the State during the last war, and in other respects having done much to keep that State in the Union, has retired to his beau- tifiil home at the head of East Chester Bay, for rest from his labors. Next to General Ellis' is Annees- wood, the residence of John Hunter, Esq., of the Hunter family of Pelham. Mr. Hunter has, near by, his paddocks for his racing stock, and may be counted as one of the successful gentlemen of the turf. He was one of the promoters and founders of the Ameri- can Jockey Club, and is perhaps as well informed on turf matters as any one in America. His house, a large stone mansion, sets back from the Boulevard in a fine forest of oaks and chestnuts. Next to Mr. Hunter's is the former residence ol' John F. Furman, recently deceased, a gentleman of public spirit and liberal views. He, at one time, rep- resented the town as supervisor. Adjoining the Fur- man place on the west is the former residence of the late Lawrence Waterbury, now occupied by his son, Mr. James M. Waterbury, who is at present the pres- ident of the Country Club in Pelham. Near by is the old George Lorillard mansion, now owned by his grand-nephew, Mr. Lorillard Spencer. On the road leading to the village, through Middletown, is the residence of Claiborne Ferris, of the family of Fer- rises, identified for generations with the township. At one time Mr. Ferris represented the district in the State Assembly. Near by, on the Boulevard, is the residence of James Henderson, for several terms su- pervisor of the township. Leaving Throgg's Neck and crossing the old bridge, we pass through the pic- turesque village of Westchester, and turning to the left and south, we find on the left of the road old St. Peter's Episcopal Church and the two Quaker Meet- ing-houses. Farther on is the former residence, on Indian Brook, of the late Edward Haight, who represented the district in Congress, and near by is the residence WESTCHESTKR. 817 of Dr. Ellis, one of the oldest and most experienced practitioners of medicine in the county. To the left and farther south is the glebe and parsonage of St. Peter's and by a road turning to the east one arrives at Castle Hill, the former residence of Gouverneur Morris Wilkins, a grandson of Rev. Isaac Wilkins, one of the former pastors of St. Peter's, and son of Martin Wilkins, a distinguished lawyer, of whom an account is given in another part of this work. The property is now owned and occupied during the sum- mer months by Colonel Screven, a son-in-law of the late Mr. Wilkins. Ou Clasoii's Point are the old D.miel Ludlow and Robert Henry Ludlow places. The former, after passing through many hands, is now the property of Mr. Leland, ofNew York, and the westerly portion of this neck is in the possession of the estate of Robert Henry Ludlow, Esq. Xear by, after crossing Pugsley's causeway, we come to Wil- mont, the former residence of the late William Wat- s >n. Esq, a well-known dealer in Irish linens and for many years a respected citizen of the town. His son, .Mr. R. C. Watson, represented the township for one term in the Board of Supervisors. Near Wihnont, on the east side of the Bronx, is situated the De Lancey estate, or so much of it as is within the township of Westchester. The de Lancey family are descended from Etienne de Lancey, a French Huguenot who came to this country after the revocation of the Edict of Nantes. The mill and the other property adjoin- iug before the Revolution was in the possession of Peter de Lancey. His son John was the father of Mrs. Governor Yates, whose daughter, Mrs. Samuel Neil, now owns and occupies a portion of the prem- ises. James, the other son, was the famous commander of the Westchester Light-Horse, the British partisan chief already mentioned in our Revolutionary chapter. It ii a strange fact that though both sons were Loyal- ists (luring the Revolution, James' propertv was for- feited by the act of attainder, while John's was not.' The other part of the de Lancey estate is owned by the heirs of Philip Lydig.- Just north of the mills on the banks of the Bronx is Bronxdale, the site of the bleaching mills of the Bolton family, and imme- diately north of the Bleach is the large estate of Peter L irillard, extending both sides of the river with a h I idsome stone mansion, garden, hot-houses and graperies. Peter Lorillard was the son of Peter Lorillard, who, with his brothers George and Jacob, were well-known and respected merchants in New York in the early part of this century. Peter, the elder, and George were the founders of the celebrated firm of P. Loril- lard & Co., now perhaps the largest manufacturing firm of tobacco in New York. The snuft mill of the firm was formerly ojierated on the Bronx, but 1 " History of New I'ork,"' by Chief .Justice Jdiiesuiul notes I'y hMwiinl F. lie Lancey. ' l\'r Lydig, see W est Furnis. of late years the factory has been located in Jersey City. Jacob, the other brother, was a leather mer- chaut in New York, in " the swamp." George never married. Peter had him surviving — Peter married Miss Griswold, from whom descended Peter (or Pierre), the present head of the firm ; Catharine mar- ried James Kernochan, of New York ; Jacob married Frances Uhlong, of New York ; Eva married Lieut. - Col. Lawrence Kip, United States army ; Ernest, de- ceased, sanx issue; Mary married Henry Barhey, of Switzerland; George married Miss Lafarge, of New York ; Louis married Miss Beekman, of New York. Jacob, the third son, leather merchant, married Miss Kuntze, of New York; by her he had Catharine Anna, married George P. Cammann, M.D., late of Fordham ; Margaretta H. married Thomas Ward, M.D., of New York; Eliza M. married N. P. Bailey, of Fordham and New York ; Jacob, deceased, mar- ried ]\Iiss Bayard, of West Farms; Emily married Lewis G. ilorris, of Fordham ; Julia married Daniel M. Edgar, formerly of Westchester. North of the Lorillard place, and fronting the Bronx, are the hamlets of Olinville and Williams' Bridge. Here is the residence of Mr. Peter Briges, and near by on the East Chester road that of the late Harvey Kidd, the first a supervisor and the latter member of Assembly from the township. On the road from Williams' Bridge to Westchester are situ- ated the country places of the late Abraham Hatfield, for many years supervisor, and near by resided Den- ton Pearsall, at one time president of the Bowery Butchers' and Drovers' Bank. Railroads. — The township is intersected by tlie Port Chester Branch of the New Haven Railroad. On this line the following stations arc within the township: West Farms, Protectory, Westchester, Timpson's and Baychester. BIOGRAPHY. FKEDERICK V. HAVEMYEK. The progenitors of the family who have obtained so honorable a position in this Slate were William F. and Frederick C. Havemyer, who came to America from Buckeburg, Schaumburg, Lippe, Germany, about the year 1802. The former was the father of William F. Havemyer, late mayor of the city of New York. The latter married Catharine Billiger, and their children were Charles H., Diederick M., George L. H., Edward H., Frederick C, Charlotte (wife of W. J. Eyer, a clergyman of the Lutheran Church), Catharine (wife of Warren Harriot), Susannah (wife of Dr. Henry Senft ) and Mary R. (wife of John I. Northrup). 818 llLSTORi' OF WESTCHESTER COU.NTY. Frederick U. Havemyer, the only surviving sun of j this family, was born in the city of New York in j 1807. At the age of nine years he entered the ] classical school conducted by Joseph Nelson, a very popular instructor and familiarly known as the blind teacher. In 1821 he entered Columbia College, where he remained till the completion of the sopho- more year, obtaining that mental discii)linc and class- ical knovi'ledge which have so largely assisted him in mercantile life. His father and uncle had previously established a sugar refinery, under the name of W. & F. C. Havemyer, in Vandam Street, New York. This establishment he entered as an apprentice and was formally introduced as such to his uncle by his father. Having obtained a thorough knowledge of the business, he formed a partnership with his cousin, William F. Havemyer, late mayor of New York, which continued till 1842, when both retired from business, and were succeeded by their brothers, Al- bert and Diederick. Possessing, at the age of twenty, sufficient skill and knowledge to conduct the busi- ness of a refinery, during all the years of this co-partner> the establishment is immediately impressed with the j magnificient engineering everywhere present, — the arrangement of the machinery, the closeness of the connections and arrangements for the cheap and easy handling of the immense amount of material daily used. There are seventeen steam-engines, many of them of large capacity, and all of modern construc- tion. In 1861 the firm was composed ot Frederick C. Havemyer, his son George and Dwight Townsend, under the firm-name of Havemyer, Townsend & Co. George Havemyer was killed by an accident before the close of the year. He was a young man of bril- liant promise and his death was a severe blow to his father's family. Subsequently Mr. Havemyer ad- milted his son, Theodore A., and his son-in-law, J. Lawrence Elder, as partners, and the firm-name be- came Havemyers & Elder, which is still retained. F. C. Havemyer, Theodore A. and H. O. Have- myer and Charles H. Senff now constitute the firm. In January, 1882, the principal buildings of the refinery were destroyed by fire. A new and more capacious refinery was soon after erected upon an adjoining site and is now in fiill operation. The present residence of Mr. Havemyer is a man- sion built by a Mr. Hammond, a large landholder, about 1800. The i)lace adjoins the grounds of Fort Schuyler, is beautifully located and affords fine views of Long Island Sound. Mr. Havemyer married Sarah L. Osborne. Their children are Frederick, George W. (deceased), Theo- dore A., Thomas J., Harry O., Mary (wife of .1. Lawrence Elder), Catharine (wife of L. J. Belloni, Jr.) and Sarah L. (wife of Frederick Jackson). COLLI.S POTTER HUNTINGTON. Mr. Huntington was born October 22, 1821, at Harwinton, Litchfield County, Conn. He comes of good stock, which counts among its noted men in this country Samuel Huntington, one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, president of the Continental Congress, and Governor and chief justice of Connecticut ; Bishop F. D. Huntington and the celebrated painter, Daniel Huntington. Mr. Huntington's father was a farmer, and at one time a manufacturer on a small scale. He was an honest, prudent and painstaking man, but never at- tained wealth. He had nine children, of whom Collis P. was the fifth. After the usual and excellent cus- tom of New England people in former days, the children were not only sent to school, but were early and carefully trained to habits of regular industry, taught the value of time and money, and encouraged to take a just pride in contributing to the mainten- ance of the household, or where, as in this case, that was not necessary, in depending on their own lalxir for pocket-money. A story, very characteristic of the man in later years, is related of the boy Collis by a neighbor, still living, who gave him the opportunity to make his first dollar. The boy, then scarcely nine years of age,,was employed by this neighbor to pile up in the wood- shed a quantity of wood which had been sawed for the winter. He piled it neatly and smoothly, and when this was done, with that spirit of thoroughness and liking for good work with which, in middle age, he built railroads, he picked up all the chips in the wood-yard, and swept it clean with an old broom. His employer, returning home in the evening, was so well pleased with the way in which the boy had done his WKSTCIIKSTKK. 81» work, that he patted him on the head, praised hiui for his faithfulness, and gave him a dollar, saying: " You have done this so well that I shall be glad to have you pile my wood next fall again." Young Huntington showed himself greatly delighted with the praise and the dollar — the first dollar he had ever earned or owned. " But," added the gentleman, who remembered this incident in the boy's life, " Collis said to me, with a bright laugh, ' You don't suppose I'm going to pile wood for a living the rest of my life?"" " ; When he was fourteen years of age he left school, ' ajul asked his father to give him his time on condi- tion that he should thenceforth support himself. It was the custom in those days in New England for boys to serve their parents until they were of age ; this service, of course, entitling them to maintenance. It is a curious proof of the confidence which the boy inspired in those who knew him, that not only did his father presently consent to his proposition, but when young Huntington went to New York, at the age of fifteen, he was able to obtain credit for a small pur- chase of goods, with which he began his career as a ' merchant, a country neighbor of his father's not only vouching for him, but saying : " You may send me all Huntington's notes ; he is sure to pay." Beginning in a small way, the young man soon ex- I tended his business, and before he was twenty-four had traveled over a considerable part of the Western j and Southern States. He took as partner an elder brother, who is now a farmer in Oisego County, in the State of New York; and at Onconta. in this county, the two finally settled themselves as general dealers or country merchants, extending their ope'ra- tions also in grain, butter, coojjering, and, in fact, in : all business directions which the region made profit- able. , In October, 1848, the two brothers made a shipment I of goods to California, where the rush of gold-seekers | had created a sudden demand for many and various j products. They sent their cargo around Cape Horn, and almost before it could arrive, Mr. Huntington de- termined himself to try the new region. He j)r(>bably felt that he needed a larger field for his enterprising spirit and his ability than was aftbrded by an interior | county in New York. He transferred his share in ' the home business to his brother, and sailed for San Francisco, by way of the Isthmus, in March, 1S4!I. : He had then been actively engaged in business, but ^ upon a small capital slowly saved, lor ten or twelve years. He was twenty-eight years of age, in perfect health, active, stronger than most men, with an iron frame and good New England habits ; and his first adventure on the way showed that the man had kept the sagacity and clear-headed enterprise of the boy. He was landed on the Isthmus in company with sev- ■ eral hundred other anxious gold-seekers; they all got across to the Pacific sis well as they could, hiring i ilonkeys for their baggage and marching on foot them- ' selves. But when they reached I'anama, no vessel appeared to take them north. They found a great crowd — the passengers by a previous steamer — waiting impatiently, and they were detained long enough to see several other steamer-loads arrive from New York and New Orleans. Thrown together in a small foreign town, a jiromiscuous company of adventurers, with no rciitraints of public opinion, and nothing to occupy their minds or hands, the unhappy people took to gambling and various kinds of dissipation ; and the cliniateand theirown imprudence caused much misery and sickness and a great many deaths. Mr. Hunting- ton feeling the need of employment to while away the tedium of delay, and disinclined to dissipation, under- took the transport of baggage and cargo across the Isthmus. He began with one donkey, and was so successful that he was presently the owner of a train of animals, and while the less energetic gold-seekers were wasting their means and health, the long delay often or twelve weeks enabled him to earn a hand- some sum of money, which gave him an important start on his arrival in San Francisco. It is a notable fact that while almost all the delayed passengers suf- fered from fevers, and many died, Huntington, who worked constantly, and marched on foot in the hot sun many times across the Isthmus, had not a day's illness. He arrived in San Francisco in August, 1849, hav- ing been five months on the way. He saw at once that that city was not the place for him, and on the very morning of his arrival, after buying a break- fast of bread and cheese, hunted up a vessel going to Sacramento. He found a schooner, the master of which — later the captain of one of the finest steamers on the Sacramento River — oft'ered him a dollar an hour to help load her, and he earned his passage- money in this way, and landed in Sacramento richer by some dollars than when he arrived in San Fran- cisco. His training and natural inborn capacity as a mer- chantand business man now came into play. Neither he nor his partner and dear friend of many years — the late Mark Hopkins — ever spent much time in actual gold-mining. Mr. Huntington, it is said, returned to Sacramento after four days at the nearest mining camp, convinced that gold-digging had too many risks beyond the control of the digger to be to his taste. He became again a merchant, and began, in a small tent and with a very liniite their means, ten, fifty or a hundred dollars for this object. At last came tiie Presidential election of 18()0, and the rumble of war, and everybody buttoned up their pockets. The scheme was about to fail. The public had something else to think of. San Fran- cisco, where the Democrats and Southern men wanted a southern line, turned its back on poor Judali. Mat- ters seemed to have come to an end, when Hunting- tou came forward with a new proposition. "I will be one of seven, if Hopkins agrees, to bear the expense of a careful and thorough survey," said he; and the result was, that at a meeting held at 54 K Street, seven men entered into a compact that they would pay out of their own pockets all the needful expenses of a complete survey for a railroad across the mountains. Of these seven, Judah, the engineer, presently died, and another dropped out. The five who remained were helped by a few outside subscrip- tions, but so visionary was the enterprise believed to be at that time that a Sacramento banker, who desired to help it, felt himself obliged to decline aid on the express ground that the credit of his bank would suf- fer if he were known to have business relations with so wild a scheme. In this way the Central Pacific Railroad Company was organized, with Leland Stanford as president, C. P. Huntington as vice-])resident, and Mark Ho{)kins as treasurer ; and the latter once said, years afterwards, that about this time he often thought they " had more railroad in 54 K Street than would be good for the hardware business." They were de- termined not to be swamped, and agreed to pay cash for all that was done ; to keep no more men at work than they could pay every month, and to make every contract terminable at the option of the company. The time came when this policy saved them. Mr. Huntington went to Washington when the company was formed, to see to the conditions of the government charter then before Congress; and before he departed for the East, the five middle-aged business men, who had undertaken this huge enterprise, gave him a power of attorney to do for them and in their name anything whatsoever — to buy, sell, bargain, con- vey, borrow or lend, without any condition excejit that he should fare alike with them in all that con- cerned their project. From this time forward Mr. Huntington's labors were mostly in the East. He re- mained in Washington, looking after the Pacific Railroad Bill, until it was at last passed and signed, and his opinion of the adventure on which this launched him and his associates was not different from that of the general public; this opinion, as well as a singular courage and determination on iiis part, were well expressed in the telegram in which he an- nounced to his partners his success : '* We have drawn the elephant ; now let us harness him." Having tele- graphed this message, he instantly went to New York to begin arrangements with hesitating and doubting capitalists for feeding the ravenous beast. It was now that all his (|iuilities of persistence, courage, financial ability and knowledge of men were brought to the test. The government bonds were promised only upon the completion of certain miles of road; the capitalists of New York would not take the bonds of the road until some part of it was in operation ; stock subscriptions came in too slowly to help out and Huntington saw failure staring him in the face. But his courage and determination rose with the emer- gency. Instead of going begging among speculators, or pledging his bonds for material, he boldly an- nounced that he would not part with the bonds ex- cept for money — cash ; and that he would not sell any at all unless a million and a half were taken. His boldness won ; but when the required amount was bid for, the purchasers timidly desired some further secu- rity, and Huntington, without a moment's hesitation, made himself and his four partners personally respon- sible for the whole amount, and it was on this pledge of their private fortunes that the first forty miles of the Central Pacific Railroad were built. But even then, so great were the straits of the enterprise, that when Huntington returned to Sacramento, after com- pleting this first loan, and buying and shipping rails and other needed material, he found the treasure- chest so low that it was necessary either to tliminish the laboring force on the work or raise more means. Once more he was equal to the emergency. " We have no time to lose," he said, "and we must do it ourselves; Huntington & Hopkins can keep five hun- dred men at work on the road for a year at their own charge ; how many will the rest of you undertake?" And it was agreed that the five partners should main- tain out of their private fortunes eight hundred men on the works for a year. That resolution greatly di- minished their troubles; for before the year was over they received their government bonds and their credit was established. But for Huntington this was only the beginning of worries and labors which would have crushed any man only a little weaker or less able than he. It was his task to remain in the East, not only to raise money, but also to expend a great deal of it for ma- terial and su])plies. All the rails, locomotives, pow- der and various other material for the road were bought by him, and shipped around Cape Horn or across the Isthmus. His transactions brought him into contact with all sorts of people in New York and other Eastern cities, and it is still told of him that j when some one who did not know him came to him in 18()2 with an otl'er of a handsome commission if he would deal with him, Huntington replied: " I want all the commissions I can get, but I want them put in the bill. This road has got to be built without any stealings;" and his bold refusal to be fleeced by sharks, and his straightforward ways of conducting 822 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. business, gained credit for him and his partners, and secured for himself the high and honorable rank he enjoys as one of the few really great financiers of this country. Allotted space does not permit a narration of the vast labors of Mr. Huntington in building the South- ern Pacific Railroad, and the Chesapeake and Ohio and its adjuncts — constituting together a continuous line four thousand miles long from San Francisco, the dominant harbor of the Pacific coast, to Chesapeake Bay, the finest natural harbor on the Atlantic; nor of the other great systems of transportation by land and water over which his control is primary and di- rect. It is said that the total length of railroads com- pleted and in progress, now intrusted to the charge of C. p. Huntington, is, in round numbers, something over ten thousand miles. Mr. Huntington continues to live, during the win- ter, in New York, where he manages the aflairs of his railroads and other great enterprises. He is largely interested in over seven of the great steamship lines of the country, is one of the founders and directors of the Metropolitan Trust Company, of New York, and has a place on the directory of the Western Union Telegraph Company. He does not go much into gen- eral society, but keeps a hospitable house of his own on Murray Hill. He spends about seven months of every year at his charming country-seat at Throgg's Neck, on Long Island Sound, whence he can reach his business and return every day. In person he is tall, of a vigorous build, with grayish-blue eyes, an aquiline nose, and a firm, solid jaw, which feature in him resembles that of General Grant. His favorite in-door relaxations are reading and whist, of which game he is an excellent player. He has formed a large and well-selected library, and has a familiar and constant ac<(uaintauce with the best books in it. He is a lover of poetry and a student of history, particu- larly of modern history, and has known admirably how to use his scant leisure. He has also gathered a large and very valuable collection of paintings, and is pretty certain to be seen at any notable sale of pic- tures, not only in New York, but in other Eastern cities, bidding judiciously, but unhesitatingly, paying a long price for a good work of art. He was, until recently, not only a skillful, but a very daring horse- man, and while he was building the Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad, parts of which run through an ex- tremely ditticult country, he was noted for his horse- manship, even among the people of that region of horsemen. Friends and business acquaintances know him as the ])ossessor of a shrewd wit. He is an admir- able story-teller, and knows how to settle a dispute with an apposite illustration almost as well as the late Mr. Lincoln. His years and labors have not told heavily upon him, and have not robbed him either of his physical activity or of his gay humor, which makes him a pleasant companion and friend. He i has always had the capacity to bind friends to him I by strong ties, and to get the best and most zealous service out of those he employs, who know him as one who exacts the strict fulfillment of duty, but who also generously rewards faithful service. In business he is careful and laborious, but an excellent administrator. He has the capacity to do a great deal of work in the hours he gives to it, and he has always been wise enough to redeem some part of his daily life from business cares and devote it to his family and to his library, where most of his evenings are spent. "Neith- er cast down nor elated" might very well be his motto; for neither has his great and fortunate career spoiled him or changed the simple habits of his life, nor have the vicissitudes of fortune been able to dis- turb his equanimity. His country residence, at Throgg's Neck, is a refuge and great source of pleasure to him. From the broad verandah of the house a neatly-kept lawn slopes away under the branches of noble trees down to the water of the Sound, and here, on a clear day or a pleasant evening, Mr. Huntington, a gentleman of command- ing stature, dressed in black and wearing a black skull-cap, may often be seen strolling up and down in conversation with friends, or watching the steam- boats and sailing-vessels as they pass, rarely otherwise than in a genial humor, and always ready with his jovial story and generous laugh. His beautiful es- tate, consisting of some thirty-odd acres, was pur- chased from F. C. Havemeyer. This gentleman had expended a great deal on its embellishment; and Mr. Huntington, securing the best talent and sparing neither time nor money, has continued to adorn and improve the house and lands until at present — with its system of water, its gas-works, its private wharf, at which large vessels are occasionally moored, its sta- bles, conservatories, farm buildings, pastures, shady walk.s, gardens and Howers — it is a model residence and a place well fitted to divert the fancy, restore the strength and rest the heart of one so earnest and un- sparing of himself in work. CHAPTER XXL MORRISANIA.' BY KORUHAM MORRIS. The town of Morrisania was formed from West Farms December 7, 1855, incorporated as a village in 18t>4, and, in 1873, was annexed to New York City. It embraces the villages of Morrisania, Mott Haven, Port Morris, Wilton, East Morrisania, Old Morrisania, West Morrisania, South Melrose, East Melrose, Woodstock, Claremont and Eltona. The lines of division between these places are, however, being lost in the extension of the streets, and they now scarcely possess a geo- I 1 For the early history of Morrisania, including the manor and the I Morris family, see the preceding chapter on the town of Westchester. RESIDENCE FKOM THE NOHTH. VIEWS AT THE HUNTINGTON HOMESI'EAD. MORRISANIA. 823 graphical existence. By the act of the supervisors of the county creating the town of Morrisania, the north liiu! began at Harlem River, near the present Aqueduet Higli Bridge, and extencU'd east to Union Avenue, wliii h was praetically the east hounds of the Morrisania Manor. Its east boundary was Union Avenue, continued to the head of Bungay Creek and thence to Harlem Kills, and its south and west boundaries, the Harlem River and Kills. The division between the Twenty-third and Twenty-fourth Wards is now extended along the old ilivision between the town- ships of West Farms and Morris.Tnia, oast to the Bronx. On April 22, 1864, the town was divided into four wards, in each of which three trustees were elected for two years, at the same time as the supervisor. When it was set off from West Farms the assessed valuation of property was $1,788,840. Gouverneur Morris, elected in 1856, was the fii-st supervisor of the town. William Cauldwell was elected in 1857, and served until 1870, when he was succeeded by Silas D. Giflbrd. In 1871 Mr. Cauldwell was again elected. In 1872 John H. Hopkins was chosen, but the next year Mr. Cauldwell began an- other term, during which annexation took place. It maj- be mentioned here that, before the selection of the site on the Potomac, a very strong feeling ex- isted in favor of locating the capital of the nation at Morrisania. The files of the New York Historical Society contain the draft of a petition which Lewis Morris forwarded to Congre.ss on that subject. It bears no date, but must have been written shortly prior to 1790, when Congress had the question of a site under consideration. It is as follows : *' To his Excellency the President and the Honorable the Memher» of the Congress of the United StttO-s nf America. "The Memorial of Lewis Morris, of Morrisania " Respectfully Sliewetli. " That your Memorialist hii3 heard that Congress inteud, on the fii-st Miinday in October next, to fix on some proper place for their future permanent residence, and that propositions are to be given in from dif- ferent places in oiilcr that the most eligible choice be made on that day. " That your Memorialist therefore is induced to address your Hon- orable tHHly in behalf of the Manor of Morrisania, in the State of New York, and humbly conceives and ho^K^sthat it will fully api)ear evident to Congress that the said 31anor is more advantageously situated fiU' their residence than any other place that has hitherto been proiH»sed to them, and nuich better accommodated with the necessary requisites of convenience i>f access, health and security. "That the convenience of acce-su lo )Iorrisania from most of the parts of the United States is much more easy, safe and expeditious than to any other place as yet proposeil for the residence of Congress ; that ves- sels from the four Kastern States may arrive at Morrisania through the Sound, which scjiarates Long Islanil from the main, in the course of a very few hours, and that ships from the Carolinas and (ieorgia may per- form voyages to Morrisania with much mure siifety and dispatch than they can to the (lortsofeither Philadelphia or .\nnapolis, not lieing incom- moded with tedious imssages of two huntlred miles each up Bays and Rivers which often consume a fortnight or three weeks — ^uissiiges rendered hazartlons by rocks and shoals, and annually olotructed by ice. *' .\nd that 31urrisaiiia is so situated that vessels may arrive from or | proceed to sea, sometimes in six hours, and at no time <-an lie detained ' by contrary winds or tide more than 4)< hourx, and that thii passage, from the ipiantity and saltness of the water, has never been totally im- peded by ice . " That your Memorialist conceives that the health of the place proposed and the salubrity of its air are points highly worthy of attention and consideration, and that your Memorialist is therefore happy to add that ' Morrisania has always been noted for this particular, that the fever and ague is there unkuown, and that persons from other places, emaciated by sickness and disease, there shortly recover and are speedily rein- stated in health and vigor. " That your Memorialist conceives that Morrisania is perfectly secure from any dangers either from foreign invasion and internal insurrection, that no naval force can arrive at Morrisania without passing by New York, and of course possessing that city, or without attempting a pas- sage of ion miles through the Sound, which separates Long Island I'roiu Connecticut, which for a fieet is impracticable, and that .Morrisania be- ing distjiut only twenty miles from the Slate of Connecticut, and eight from the City of New York that it therefore can be amply piotecteeing {Hircelled out into small farms, and the vicinity of sev- eral towns, together with the city of New York, there are more fighting men within a sweep of thirty miles around Morrisania than perhaps within the same distance around any other place in .\nierica, as there are many populous places which contain large proportions of inhabit- ants who are principled by religion against bearing arms, and other places which contain many negro inhabitants who not only do not fight themselves, but by keeping their masters at home, prevent them from fighting also.'' ^ RELIGIOUS DENOMINATIOXS. The Episcopal Church. — Morrisania was asso- ciated with the parish of Westchester until 1840, when Gouverneur Morris founded the present paro- chial Church of St. Ann's, the first building in the town devoted to worship. It was incorporated July 20, 1841, at which time Robert Morris and Lewis Morris were wardens, and Jacob Buckhout, Daniel Deveau, Benjamin Rogers, Benjamin M. Brown, Ed- ward Leggett, Lewis G. Morris and Harry M. Morris, vestrymen. On the preceding July 17th, Gouverneur Morris conveyed the church and the ground on which it stands to the rector, wardens and vestry, only re- j serving the two vaults in which repose the remains of his mother and father. The conditions of his gift were that the church edifice "shall be devoted to the j service of God according to the rites and ceremonies j of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United I States of America, and shall not be used for any other purpose whatsoever ; that such of the pews as are marked in the plan annexed to the deed as 'free' shall never be sold or rented, but shall remain free, so that all persons coming to the said church to worship therein may freely use and occupy the same." The I land conveyed with the church could only be used for the purposes of a parsonage and a garden and a site for sheds, and the residue as a cemetery or bury- ing-ground. No rector or minister could be called or employed to officiate during the life of the donor, with- out his previous consent in writing. The donor also prohibited the premises from being mortgaged. The march of improvement has cut nj) all the surrounding property into streets and avenues, and in a few years St. Ann's will be like old St. Mark's in the Bowery, a rural church in the midst of a city. In vaults be- I The aUive was kindly conunuDicated by Mr. Kelby, Aaaistant Libra- rian of the N. Y. liist. Soc., to whom for this and many other favors the author is greatly indebted. 824 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. neath the church repose the remains of most of the Morrises who owned Morrisania, they having been re- moved there when Mr. Harry Manigault Morris, executor of the estate of Lewis Morris, sold that por- tion of Morrisania which lies west of the Mill Brook. These remains were brought from the family vault, which stood not far from the present house, now- known as Christ's Hotel. Amongst the remains are those of Lewis Morris, the colonial Governor of New Jersey, and Lewis Morris, the signer of the Declara- tion of Independence. In another vault repose the re- mains of Robert Hunter Morris, a son of Robert Mor- ris, of Fordham, thrice mayor of New York City, also its recorder, postmaster of New York, and justice of the Supreme Court. In another are the remains of Brevet Brig. -Gen. Wm. Walton Morris,' colonel of the 2nd U. S. Artillery, and an officer who, during the late Rebellion, by his sound judgment and moral bravery, is entitled to much of the credit of saving Baltimore from falling into the hands of the Confederates.'-' 1 As one of General Morris' peraonal staff, in Baltimore, I wish to add that my commanding officer received the first, or one of the first, brevets as a brigadier general given by the government during the Civil War, and the above correspondence is given, not for the perpetuation of the family name, but as a loyal act, due from a staff officer to his general. I also wish to add that his brevet and assignment to duty as a general was a personal detriment to him, for, a few luoiiths afterwards, being given his regular commission as colonel of the Second United States Artillery, he could, as such, have drawn higher pay than a brigadier, as his " old fogy rations " as colonel and his long service in the army entitled him to higher compensation than that of a brigadier-genera!. But Mr. Lincoln having given him his cinnmission by brevet, and his assignment, he did as he always did, his duty, and took liigher rank and less pay. General Morns' services dated back to the Florida War, and in Mexici) he was a veteran. [Author.] - General Morris was a participant in a very notable incident of the early days of the war. This wa,s his refusal to obey a writ of hahe'-i» corpus issued by Judge Giles of the United States District Court for Maryland. The subjoined correspondence gives the history of the affair. "Fort McIIenhv, Mo., Monday, Gth August, ISGl. '* Hon. Win. Fell Oiles, Judge nf U. S. Dist. Court for the Dlst. of Mariilaml : "Sir, — My attention has been directed to an article in the Local Column of the Bullimore Sun of this date, headed, ' The Habeas Corpus Refusal.' Presuming that that article is authentic, I wish very respect- fully to submit for your consideration the following remarks on this un- happy ' Contlict of authority between those owing allegiance to the same government and bound by the same laws : ' "To avoid ^implicating parties in nowise conuected with this case, per- mit me to observe at the threshold that m}' action in the premises was taken entirely on my own responsibility, without instructions from or consultation with any jierson whatever, and now I wish most respect fully Ui inform your Honor that I regard the writ of Habeas Corpus as the very basis of free government, and that under all ordinary circum- stances I am very ready to acknowledge the Supremacy of the Civil authorities. But, as you admit, the Constitution of the United States has provided that this writ of Habeas Corpus may be suspended in case of rebellion if the public safety requires it. You, however, allege that there is 'no such state of affairs existing as would authorize its suspen- sion.' On this point it is with regret that I am compelled to differ from BO eminent an antliority, and I am further constrained to add that the question is one of fact rather than of opinion. "At the date of issuing your writ and for two weeks previous, the city in which you live and where your Court has been held was entirely under the control of revolutionary authorities. Within that period United States soldiers, while conunitting no offence, had been perfidiously attacked and inhumanly murdered in your streets ; no punishments had been awarded, and I believe no arrests had been made for these atrocious crimes; supplies of provisions intended for this garrison had been stop- ped ; the intention to cai)ture this fort had beeu boldly proclaimed ; your most public thoroughfares were daily patrolled by large numbers iif The church is built on rising ground near Old Morrisania, and is a handsome Gothic structure of white marble. The rectory adjoins it on the west. This is a list of pastors, — 1841, Rev. Arthur C. Cox ; 1842, Rev. Charles Jones; 1843, Rev. Charles Aldis ; 1847, Rev. Abraham B. Carter; 1852, Rev. S. Pinkney Hammond; 1861, Rev. William Huckel, resigned. St. Paul's Episcopal Church, situated on Fordham Avenue, near the former town line, owes its origin to the labors of Rev. A. B. Carter, who, while engaged as rector of St. Ann's, organized the congregation on July 8, 1849. It was at first a connection of St. Ann's, the chapel having been consecrated June 22, 1850. In May, 1853, it was erected into a full parish troops armed and clothed at least in part with articles stolen from the United States ; and the Federal flag while waving over the Federal of- fices was cut down by some person wearing the uniform of a Mai-yland soldier. To add to the foregoing, an assemblage elected in defiance of law, but claiming to be the legislative body of your Stitte, and so recog- nized by the Executive of Maryland, was debating the forms of abrogat- ing the Federal compact. If all this be not rebellion, I know not what to call it. I certainly regard it as a sufficient legal cause for suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus. " Besides, there %vere certain grounds of expediency on which I de- clined obeying your mandate. " First, the writ of Habeas Corpus in the hands of an unfriendly power might depopulate this fortification and place it at the mercy of a ' Balti- more mob ' in much less time than it could be done by all the appliances of modern warfare. "Second. The ferocious spirit exhibited by your community towards the United States Army would render me very averse from appearing publicly and unprotected in the city of Baltimore to defend the interests of the body to which I belong. A few days since a soldier of this com- mand, while outside the walls, wasattacked by a fiend or fiends in human shape, almost deprived of life, and left unprotected about half a mile from garrison. He was found in this situation and brought in covered with blood. "One of your evening prints was quite jocose over this laughable oc- currence. And now, sir, permit me to say, in conclusion, that no one can regret more than I this conflict between the civil and military authorities. " If, in an experience of thirty-three years you have never before known the writ of Habeas Corpus to be disobeyed, it is only beciiuse such a contingency in political affairs as the present has not before arisen . I claim to be a loyal citizen, and I hope my former conduct, both official and private, will justify this pretension. " In any condition of affairs, except that of Civil war, I would cheer- fully obey your order, and as soon iis the present excitement shall pass away I will hold myself ready not only to produce the soldier, but also to appear in person to answer for my own conduct ; but in the existing state of sentiment in the city of Baltimore, I think it your duty to sus- tain the Federal military and to strengthen their hands, instead of en- deavoring to strike them down. "I have the honor to be very respectfully Your obedientservant, " W. W. Morris, Major 4tA U. S. Artillery Comdg. the Post." " Sir : " Baliimoke, May 7, 1861. " As your letter of yesterday just received by lue, is addressed to me in my official character, I shall file it in Court as your reasons for not obeying the Writ of Habeas Corpus — you are correct in the supposition that the article to which you nd'er in the Sun is authentic. I reduced to writing what I said in Court on the return of the Mai-shal because I deemed it important that the daily press, which had on the morning of Friday noticed your action in reference to the writ before I knew of it myself, should not unintentionally misrepresent anything said by the Court. Y'ou will excuse uxe for any revision of the fact and argument of your letter. As I have no personal wish in this matter other than to dis- charge the duty devolved upon me by my official position and from which I cannot turn aside, I will only repeat again my deep regret that you have deemed it your duty particularly to suspend the ' writ of Habeas Corpus,' a power which, in my opinion, belongs to Congress only. " I am very Respectfully your obedient Servant, " W'lLLiAM F. Giles, U. S. District Judge for Maryhind. " To Major W. W. Morris, ith V. S. Arty., Fort McHenry." MORRISANIA. 825 organization, with its present title, and Rev. Benjamin Akerly was called as rector. He was followed in 1858 by Rev. Samuel G. Appleton, during whose in- cumbency the rectory was built. Rev. F. B. Van Kleeck was called in November, 1808, and resigned May 1, 1870- Rev. Thomas R. Harris then accepted the va(;ant place. In 1871 the church was redecorated and many repairs were made. St. Mary's Protestant Episcopal Church, of Morris- ania, is situated on the east side of Alexander Avenue, near One Hundred and Forty-second Street. It is a frame building, in the Gothic style, and seventy-five by fifty feet in dimensions. It was originally a chapel of St. Ann's Ciuirch, which erected the building on Garden or One Hundred and Forty-third Street, near College Avenue, and then removed it to its present location, as being more central. The corner-stone of the first edifice was laid May 1, 1856. The church was consecrated on September 15, 185(5, and the parish incorporated September 29, 1857, when Rev. George C. Pennell was rector and Edward Haight and George Richmond wardens. Mr. Haight then liquidated its debts and the deed of the property was transferred to him. The corner-stone of the second church was laid September 9, 1875, by Bishop Potter. Rev. Christo- pher S. Stephenson was then rector ; George Briggs and John C- Grant, wardens ; William R- Beal, Richard Sterling, John T. Almaise, Edmund Pyne, Thomas Lockwood, William T. Hargrave, George W. Thurber and David P. Arnold, vestrymen ; William R. Beal, John C- Grant, William T. Hargrave and G- W. Thurber, building committee. The pastors have been, — 1856- 57 Rev. Mr. Hammond. 1857- 62 llev. George C. Peuuoll. 1802-63 Rev. Kastman Benjaniin. ISCi— Rev. John W. Biiekniastcr. 1864 — Rev. Samuel K. .Tolinson, D.D. 1864-66 Rev. J. H. Hobart De Mille. 1866-70 Rev. Francis F. Rice. 1870-74 Rev. C. S. Knapp. 1874-78 KeY. C. S. Stephenson. 1878-83 Rev. J. R. Davenport. D.D. 1884 — Rev. Harry Floyd Auld, present incumbent. The wardens in 1886 were W. T. Marvin and D. P. Arnold, vestry ; J. B. Brown, A. H. Pride, D. H. McCormack, T. Conklin, W. W. L- Yoorhis, C A. Waterbury, E. L. Smith, J. S. McCoy. The carved wood altar was presented by Dr. Davenport, and the vases and cross by Mr- and Mrs. Alfred Davenport. The Catholic Church. — The parish church of St. Augustine is located at the corner of Jefferson and Franklin Avenues. The church buildings and rectory were erected in 1859. The first parish priest was Rev. Stephen Ward, a native of County Longford, who departed this life June 22d, and is interred be- neath the church, an appropriately inscribed tablet marking his place of sepulture- In the church are many articles of ecclesiastical furniture, win- dows, memorials, etc., presented by Mrs. M. E. Mona- ghan, James McGarrity, J. and V. Lynch, Mrs. Rose 75 Ferrigan, Henry McGough, Michael Cunningham, Francis McKcnna, Janu-s JIcKenna, St. Augustine's Beneficial Society and the parish. In East Morrisania is the Convent of the Ursuline Nuns, and connected with it an academy, which they conduct for the education of young hidies. It is under the direction of Mother Dominick, the Superi- oress. Father Stumpfe is the resident pastor, and he has charge of St. Mary's church, at Melrose, of tlie same denomination, and another church of the same persuasion is under the guidance of Rev. Father Nolan, at Highbridgeville. The Presi!Yteri.\x Church.— The First Pres- byterian Church of the village of Morrisania was organized at a meeting at the house of Lawrence S. Mott, September 10, 1849. The first trustees were Lawrence S. Mott, Andrew Cauldwell, David Austin, Enoch S. Burstrand and Daniel Ayres. At Washington Avenue and One Hundred and Sixty-seventh Street is the Potts Memorial Presby- terian Church, a handsome edifice erected to the memory of Rev. Dr. Potts. Rev. Arthur Potts was elected the first pastor April 1, 1866. The present pastor is Rev. James Jlorton. ]\Iethodist Churches.— February 8, 1850, a meet- ing was held at the Episcopal Chapel for the pur- pose of organizing a Methodist Episcopal Church in Morrisania, under the care of the Harlem Station, and the New York District of the New York Con.'er- euce. The name of the congregation was declared to be the " Methodist P^piscopal Church of the village of Morrisania, County of Westchester." Stephen T. Wright, Moses T. Farrington, James Parker, John York and John T. Ferguson were the first trustees. The German-speaking people of the Methodist faith have their own church at Morri.sania. It was organized on April 12, 1853, by a meeting held at the residence of John .1. Knoeppel, and the first trustees elected were Mr. Knoeppel, Charles H. Buttner, Jacob Weible, Anton Romnig, Lewis K. Osborn, John L. Haynes and Robert Crawford. Other Dexomixatiox-s. — At Mott Haven is the Reformed Dutch Church, which wits incorporated Sep- tember 18, 1855, with J. L. Cummings, E. S. Burs- trand, Thomas H. Lcggett, Hayward A. Harvey, William H. McMasters, M. D. Van Doran, James Smith, William Kidd and William Potter. The Dutch Reformed Church of the village of Mel- rose was incorporated September 25, 1857. Rev. Ernst Schoeppel was the first minister, and the deacons were Charles L. Georgi, Frederick Lambart, Peter Herlick and Christopher JIabus ; the elders, George Illig, Valentine Kolter, Christian Gumpert, George Hoff- man and John Spaeth. The First Congregational Church was organized October 1, 1851. The congregation elected as the first board of trustees Philo Price, John A. Henry, Charles Speaight, Daniel Desmond, Joseph S. Ives and George Pollock. 826 HISTOKi^ OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. At Highbridgeville is the Union Chapel, founded largely by the efforts of the late Mrs. Anderson, of " Woody Crest," and her daughters. The First Baptist Church dates from a meeting for purposes of organization held September 17, 1850. The trustees chosen were Joseph Wiley, Thomas W. Hyde, Alexander M. Stratton, James Hardwick and George Hull. BIOGRAPHY. THE MORRIS FAMILY. Among the names of ancestral note there are none who are more closely ideuiified with American history than the family which has produced so many distin- guished representatives, and whose annals must ever remain a most important part of the chronicles of the country and State. As the purchase and estab- lishment of the Manor of Morrisania is fully narrated in another portion of this work, present attention is confined to the tracing of the line of descent of the family which has just claims to be called illustrious. William Morris, of Tintern, Monmouthshire, Eng- land, was the father of three sons, — Colonel Lewis Morris, who inherited the estate in England, but emigrated to the West Indies in 1662, and settled in Morrisania, Westchester County, in 1674; William, who lived in Wales, and was an officer in the Parlia- mentary army ; and Richard, who was a captain in the regiment of which his brother Lewis was colonel, and was the first of the name who owned the manor 80 long known as Morrisania. The latter married Sarah Pole, in the Island of Barbadoes, to which he had retired upon the restoration of the monarchy in Eng- land, and their only child was Hon. Lewis Morris, born in 1672, and by the untimely death of his parents left an orphan in early infancy. He rose to the highest positions, and was the first Governor of New Jersey, and a man of wealth and the highest distinction, and at an early period was the representative in the Assem. bly of New York for the county of Westchester. He was among the early benefactors of Trinity Church, of which he was for many years a vestryman, and after a long life of honor, usefulness and influence, he died at Kingsbury, near Trenton, on the 21st of May, 1746, at the advanced age of seventy-three. In ac- cordance with the directions in his will, his mortal remains were deposited in a vault on his estate of Morrisania, and were accompanied to their last rest- ing place by the highest dignitaries of the time. Hon. Lewis Morris married Isabella, daughter of Sir James Graham, attorney-general of the province of New York. She survived him several years, and died in 1752, and was laid to rest by his side in Mor- risania. She was lamented as one who was richly endowed with the graces that ornament, and the virtues that adorn, humanity. The children of this marriage were Hon. Robert Hunter Morris, chief justice of New Jeisey; Hon. Lewis Morris, judge of the High Court of Admiralty, and of the Court of Oyer and Terminer; and six daughters, — Elizabeth wife of White ; Margaret ; Arabella G.; Ann; Mary, wife of Pierce; and Euphemia. Hon. Lewis Morris, who succeeded his illustrious father as the owner of Morrisania, was born September 23, 1698, and died July 3, 1762. The whole of his life was devoted to public affairs, and he was justly considered one of the foremost men of the days that preceded the Revolution, in which his son was des- tined togain an imperishable name. His first wife was J,KWLS .MuKiUS. Catharine Staats, and the children of this marriage were General Lewis Morris, the illustrious signer of the Declaration of Independence ; General Staats Long Morris;^ and Hon. Richard Morris, judge of the High Court of Admiralty in 1776. After the death of Mrs. Morris, Mr. Morris married Sarah Gouverneur. Their children were Hon. Gouv- erneur Morris (a name famous in our country's annals) and three daughters, — Isabella, wife of Rev. Isaac Wilkins, D. D. ; Sarah Euphemia, wife of Samuel Ogden ; and Catharine, wife of V. P. Ashfield. ' He was an oflBcer of liigli rank in tlie British army, and married Catliarine, tlie celebrated Duchess of Gordon, whose son. Lord George Gordon, was famous as the leader of the Anti-ropery Riots, 1793 A portrait of General Morris is now in possession of William 11. Moiris, MoiTisiinia I 1 MORRISANIA. 827 General Lewis Morris, the eldest son, and the fifth proprietor of the Manor of Morrisania, was born April 8, 1726. He enjoyed the best opportunities for education that the country then aflorded, and gradu- ated from Yale College in 1740, and hisn/w«a via/er did honor to herself by conferring upon him the degree of Master of Arts in 1790. After finishing his education he returned to his native manor, where for years he passed the life of a quiet agriculturist. The Revolu- tion found in him a man ready for the hour, and from the time when the struggle for independence began to the day when victory closed the contest there was no man whose heart and soul were more devoted to the cause. In the early part of the war he was a brigadier-general in the Continental army, and was instructed by Congress to take possession of such parts of the province bordering on Long Island Sound and Hudson River as might be most exposed to attack and occupation by the enemy. In 1775 he was elected a member of the Continental Congress, and was one of that noble band who pledged their all to the country's good. In 1777 he issued an address to the citizens of New York urging them to support the Constitution prepared by the conven- tion of the United States for the temporary form of government. His honored life was closed in 1798, and his remains were laid with those of his ancestors in the family vault at Morrisania, but were in after- years removed to a vault under St. Ann's Church. General Lewis Morris married ]\[ary Walton, who died in 1794. Their children were Colonel Lewis Morris, aid to General Greene ; General Jacob Morris, of Otsego County, New York ; William ; James ; Staats ; Commodore R. Valentine ; ' Catharine, wife of Thomas Lawrence; Mary, second wife of Thomas Lawrence; Sarah; and Helen, wife of John Rutherford. James Morris, the fourth child, was born 1764, and his early childhood was passed at his father's seat in Morrisania. He was sent to England, under the care of his uncle. General Staats Long Morris, and was educated at the famous school at Eton, and afterward traveled extensively with his uncle's I'amily. After remaining in England several years he returned to his native land and studied law in the office of Aaron Burr, then in the zenith of his 1 Commodore Morris, United States Navy, died iu 1815 on the family estate now occupied in part by his grandson, Henry Lewis Morris. He married Ann Walton, and their issue were Gerard W., Richard \. and Henry. Gerard married Martha I'yne, and their cliildren were Gerard, Isabella, .\nnie P., Richard B., Captain John P., Heury W. (who attained the highest honors in the Masonic order), Mononah and Mary Pyne. All died unmarried, except the last two named. Mononah married Francis Barl-etto, Jr., who died in ISGfi, leaving aa sole heir Gerard JI. Barretto, of Jiew York City. Mary Pyne married Jonathan Kdwards. Their children were Gerard M., Mary Morris ami Rev. .\rthur Jlorris, Episcoi«al missionary at Tokio, Japan. Richard V. Morris died unmarried in 184:!. Hemy, third son of the commodore, married Mary X., daughter of Hon. J. C. iSpencer, Secretary of War and of the Treasury under President Tyler. Their children were Mary Natalie (died uumarried, 1870) and Henry Lewis, who married Anna M. Russell, and resides on Mott Avenue, Morrisania, and whose children are Eleanor R. and Lewis Spencer. legal fame. At a later date he was appointed high sheriff of New York by Governor John Jay. In 1796 he married Helen, daughter of Augustus Van Cort- landt, of Yonkcrs, and removing from the city of New York, settled at Morrisania, where the remainder of his life was passed as a country gentleman of ample means and refined tastes. His large estate gave him favorable opportunities as an agriculturist, and he was foremost among the farmers of the State and one of the founders of the Westchester Agricultural Society, one of the first in the country, and through- out his life was a man of success, integrity and honor. Mr. Morris died September 7, 1827, at the age of sixty-three, leaving a family of twelve children, — 1. James Van Cortlandt, who married Catharine, daughter of Wright Post, M.D., of New York, and had one son, James, who died unmarried. 2. Augustus, who assumed the name of Van Cort- landt, to succeed to the ownership of an estate in Yonkers. He married Harriet, daughter of Peter Jay Munro, Esq., and had two sons, — Augustus, a phy- sician, who died in 1885, without children ; and Peter Jay Munro, who married Ann M. Hunter, and is now living at Pelham, without children. 3. Catharine, wife of Dr. Alexander H. Stevens, of New York. They had one child, Alexa, wife of Rev. James Bowdoin, of New York. They have one child, Constance. 4. Mary Walton, who died unmarried. 5. Helen, who married Richard R. Morris, son of Col. Lewis Morris, and grandson of the signer. Their children were Helen and Lewis, both of whom died un- married; Anna, second wife of the present Gouverneur Morris, of Morrisania; she died in 1884, leaving no children ; Mary W., who is now living at Pelham ; So- phia, who married Charles B. Burrill, a lawyer of New York, who has children — Drayton, Mary and Percy. 6. Nancy, who died unmarried. 7. Dr. Richard L., who died June, 1880. He married Elizabeth, daughter of Colonel N. Fish, and sister of Governor Hamilton Fish. Their children are James, who married Elizabeth W. Gray, and has no children ; Elizabeth, the wife of Elliott Marshall, of Mississippi, both deceased (they left children, — Elliott, Eliza- beth M. and Sarah E.) ; Nicholas Fish, who was lost at sea by the foundering of the man-of-war " Albany," leaving no children ; Richard L., who married Lillian Munson, both deceased (they left children, — Mun- son and Helen, now living in Astoria) ; Stuyvesant Fish, M.D., who married Ellen J., daughter of Smith Van Buren, son of President Van Buren, and is now living on Lexington Avenue, N. Y. (they have four children,— Elizabeth M., Ellen V. B., Richard L. and I Stuyvesant F.); Charlotte Louisa, who married Martin Wilkins, of Morristown, N. J., who have no children ; Margaret, wife of Bayard U. Livingston, of Albany (they ha ve one child, XJrquhart) ; Helen V. C, deceased, who married David King, but left no children. 828 HISTOKi" OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. 8. Robert Rutherford, who lived at Davenport's Neck, New Rochelle. He married Hannah, daughter of William Edgar. They had children, — Catharine, who married Henry Phelps ; Annie, died unmarried ; Edgar, died unmarried ; Cornelia, unmarried ; and Helen, wife of Dr. Magill, United States army, who left no children. 9. Louisa, who married Edward Leroy, of Avon, Genesee County, N. Y. They had one child, Helen, now living in New York. She married Pinckney Stewart (deceased). Their children are Louisa, wife of James Kent, grandson of the illustrious jurist, and who is now a practicing lawyer in New York ; Helen, who married Kent ; and Edward. 10. William H. 11. Charlotte, who married Richard Kemble, who has one child, Mary, now living in New York. William H. Morris. — William H. Morris, the tenth child and the sole surviver of the above family, was born August 3, 1810. In his childhood he at- tended school at Harlem, and afterwards at Blooming- dale, under the care of Dr. Davenport, from which he went to the school at Hyde Park, under the charge of Dr. Allen, and was subsequently a student at the Military Academy, Middletown, Conn. He returned ! home at the time of the death of his father, and under ' the charge of his guardian, Gerard W. Morris, traveled extensively in Europe in 1831 and 1832. Returning, he married, in 1834, Miss Hannah, daughter of Thomas Newbold, of New York. Their children were James Staats, born 1836, died 1875; Augustus New- bold; and William H., who died unmarried in 18.52. Mrs. Morris died in 1842, and Mr. Morris subsequently married Caroline, daughter of Caleb Halsted, of New- York, who died in 1848. In 1850 he married Ella, daughter of Hugh Birckhead, of Baltimore. Their children are Augusta McEvers, wife of Frederick J. De Peyster, and Juliet B., who is now living with her father in Morrisania. Mrs. Morris died in 1881. The greater part of the life of Mr. Morris has been spent upon his family estate at Morrisania, where he was for years extensively engaged in agriculture, which he conducted with great energy and success. During his long life he has seen the rural district of Morrisania become the thickly-settled wai-dof a great city, and the place where he now lives may be called the last relic of Morrisania, as it was in early days. The mansion, which stands upon an eminence over- looking the country round, was built by his father in 1816, and stands a few feet east of the site of a former house, built in 1795. In the family mansion, sur- rounded by the relics of the past, Mr. Slorris passes the evening of his days in quiet aud dignified repose, and commanding the respect and the confidence of the entire comaaunity. Among other relics of days gone by are fine por- traits of Hon. Gouverneur Morris, painted while min- ister to France; Colonel Lewis Morris, son of the signer; and General Staats Long Morris. Augustus Newbold Morris, the only surviving son of William H. Morris, was born June 3, 1838. He graduated from Columbia College in 1860, and traveled extensively in Europe and the East, includ- ing the Holy Land, in 1864-66, and again in 1874-75, and the third time in 1882. He is identified with many benevolent institutions, and is a member of the executive committee and a liberal supporter of the Home for Incurables, one of the noblest institutions in the county. Prominent in the social and busineis life of New York, he is governor of the Union Club, and as the financial manager of large estates he commands by his integrity the respect and confidence of all who know him. His beautiful country place at Pelham was noted as the seat of elegant hospitality, and famous for the valuable horses and cattle raised uuder the care of the owner. Mr. Morris married Eleanor Colford, daughter of General James I. Jones. Their children are Newbold and Eva Van Cortlandt. Mr. Morris and his family are members of the Church of the Holy Spirit, of which he was warden for many years, and is now a member of the vestry. His country-seat at Pelham has lately been taken as a portion of the New Park, and his present country residence is at Ridgefield, Conn.' LEWIS G. MORRIS. Lewis Gouverneur Morris, son of Robert Morris, and sixth in the line of descent from Richard Morris, the first settler of the name, whose numerous descend- ants have acted so prominent a part in the history of the country, was born at Claverack, Columbia County, N. Y., August 19, 1808, while his parents were mak- ing a visit there. His father, who had inherited an estate from his ancestors, was engaged in mercantile pursuits in New York, and the rest of the children iiaving been provided for, it naturally devolved upon L3wis G., as the son of their old age, to remain with his parents upon the ancestral heritage.. To the care and development of this estate his time and energies were devoted, and under his skillful management the '"Mount Fordham " farm became known far and wide, and his name was justly ranked as foremost among the agriculturists of the State. His attention was early called to the necessity and advantage of improving the various breeds of domestic animals. With this end in view, he made repeated visits to Europe, at first in company with Mr. N. J. Becar, forming the acquaintance of the leading agriculturists of Great Britain, and returning to this country, brought with him the finest specimens of live-stock to be purchased in England. The rare value of his imported animals was quickly koown, and the public and private sales at Mount Fordham, which began in 1848 and continued for many years, were noted events and brought purchasers from every portion of the country, and cattle from this farm were sent to ' The sketch of the Morris family was prepared by a friend. MORRISANIA. 829 every State in the Union, and also to Canada, Cuba and the Sandwich Islands. So greatly did these herds improve, on this side of the Atlantic, that the owners of large estates in Eng- land sent agents who purchased at fabulous prices, and carried back to the Old World the descendants of animals which Mr. Morris originally selected and which had been so lately exported from their own shores. It is safe to say that the increased value of live-stock in this couutrv, which is directly attribu- table to the various importations made by Mr. Morris, must be estimated by millions. One of the most important events in his life was his connection with the improvement of Harlem River and building of the High Bridge. At the time of constructing the Crotou Aqueduct, the commissioners had determined to carry the water across Harlem River by inverted syphons over a low bridge, with only one archway, eighty feet in width. This at- tempt, which would have effectually destroyed the nav- igation of the river, met with the most determined op- position from the land-owners along its shores, and of this opposition Mr. Morris was the most prominent representative. To his far-seeing mind it was evident that the time must come when water communica- tions made by nature between the Hudson River and Long Island Sound, would, when improved by art, become the channel for a mighty commerce. From time immemorial, it had been a navigable arm of the sea, and Mr. Morris, with his neighbors, resolved to have it restored to its former condition. At that time the navigation of the stream was impeded, if not wholly destroyed, by Macomb's dam, constructed under an act of Legislature passed in 1813. This ob- struction to a navigable stream was, in the opinion of Mr. Morris and his associates, a public nuisance, and a plan was forthwith formed for its abatement. Mr. Morris, at the request of his neighbors, hired a small vessel, owned by parties in another State (with a view of having the question brought before the P'ederal I courts), and engaged the master to deliver a cargo of coal at his landing. The attempt of the vessel to proceed on her voyage being prevented by the dam, the company on board proceeded, on the night of September 14, 1838, to abate the nuisance by tearing down and removing a portion of the obstructing work. The suit-at-law which followed, in the case of " William Renwick vs. Lewis G. Morris et a'.," was carried up to the Court of Chancery, and the final decision established the theory that Harlem River was a navigable stream, and any obstruction was a public nuisance liable to be abated by any one inter- ested in the navigation. The constant remonstrance and persistent efforts of Mr. Morris and his associates to prevent the building of a low bridge over the river were at length crowned with success, and an Act of Legislature passed May 3, 1839, prescribed that the Aqueduct Bridge should be constructed with arches and piers of at least eighty feet span and a hundred feet in height ; and the magnificent High Bridge is a lasting monument to their perseverance and energy. Mr. Morris was appointed in 1840 inspector of the Fourth Division of Militia Infantry, with the rank of colonel, a position wliich he held till 1847. In 1861 Mr. Morris was a member of the War Com- mittee, was appointed colonel of volunteers August 14, 1862, and was instrumental in raising the One Hundred and Thirty-fifth Regiment, known as the "Anthony Wayne Guards," later as the Sixth New York Heavy Artillery, and which was afterwards commanded by Colonel (afterwards Brigadier-Gen- eral,) Wm. H. Morris. Mr. Morris was president of the New York State Agricultural Society, and has been since 1850 a life member of the Royal Agricultural Society of Eng- land. The estate of Mount Fordham is a portion of the old Manor of Fordham, was purchased by Lewis Morris, grandson of Richard, the first settler, and has descended to its present owner from his ancestors. So much has been written concerning the distin- guished family of which Mr. Morris is a representative, that little remains to be said. The line of descent is : fii-st, Richard, who came to this country in 1670 ; second, Lewis, born at Morrisania, in 1672 ; third, Lewis, Governor of New Jersey, as was also his father ; fourth, Richard, who was judge of Admiralty under the crown, and the successor of John Jay as second chief justice of New Y''ork, and whose brother, Lewis Morris, was the illustrious signer of the Decla- ration of Independence; fifth, Robert, born in 1763, and married Frances, daughter of Isaac Ludlam, of Goshen, Orange Co. Their children were Richard ; Julia, wife of William B. Ludlow ; Mary, wife of James A. Hamilton, son of the illustrious statesman; James L., who married Lucretia, daughter of Peter Crary; Francis W., wife of Thomas W. Ludlow; Robert H. who was mayor of New Y'ork, recorder, and judge of the Supreme Court, and married Ann Eliza ilunson ; Wm. L., who married Mary E. Bab- cock; and Lewis G. Mr. Morris married Emily, daughter of Jacob Lor- illard. She died in 1850, leaving two children, — Fordham and Francis, Fordham Morris, the elder son, is a practicing law- yer in New York. He married Annie Louise West- cot, and had one child, — Emily Lorillard. Francis Morris, the younger son, was educated in the United States Naval Academy, at Annapolis. He served in the late war and was present at the attack on Fort Fisher, rose to the rank of commander, and shortly before his death, which occurred February 12, 1883, was executive officer of the " Tennessee." He married Harriet H. Bedlow, and left two children, — Alice and Lewis G. The family mansion at Mount Fordham, was built in and greatly enlarged and improved by its pres- ent owner. The family portraits here preserved 830 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. embrace a fine engraving of Lewis Morris, the owner of Morrisania, and elegant paintings of his son Lewis and his grandson Richard, the Judge of Admiralty, attached to which is the hilt of his official sword ; and also of Eobert Morris, the father of the present owner of the mansion. Shunning politics, and declining all offers of official preferment, Mr. Morris has been content to lead a life of quiet usefulness; and to all who have the honor of his acquaintance, he is known as one who is " worthy to bear without reproach, the grand old name of Gentleman." JORDAN L. MOTT. The ancestor of the Mott family, which has so many representatives in various portions of the coun- try, was Adam Mott, who was born in England in 1606 and came to Boston in 1636. He was chosen freeman in Hingham, Massachusetts, in 1637, from which place he moved and settled at Newton, L. I., and afterward went to Hempstead. At the time of the English conquest, in 166-4, he was one of the com- missioners for arranging the transfer of New Amster- dam to the English government. He died at Hemp- stead, L. I., in 1686, leaving a wife, Sarah, and six children — John, Adam, Joseph, Elizabeth, Nathaniel and Mary. Of this famil}', Adam, the second son, was born in England in 1629, and came with his father to Amer- ica. His first wife was Phebe, whose maiden-name is unknown. After her decease he married Elizabeth, probably daughter of John Richbell, whose name was prominent among the early settlers of Westchester. He died at an advanced age, leaving fourteen chil- dren — Adam,, James, Charles, John, Joseph, Gershom, Elizabeth (wife of Henry Goder), Henry, Grace, Richbell, Ann, William, Mary and Hannah (wife of John Seaman). The descendants of these are very numerous. Charles, the third son, was one of a com- pany of eighteen who, in 1719, emigrated from Hemp- stead, L. L, to what is now Rockland County, N. Y. where they purchased a large tract of land, and some of his descendants are still to be found in that region. Among the descendants of William Mott may be mentioned the famous surgeon. Dr. Valentine Mott, late of the city of New York, while James has many descendants in Westchester County. Joseph, the fifth son, was the father of Jacob Mott, born August 9, 1714, and died October 6, 1805.> He married Abigail Jackson, born November 18, 1720, and died in 1781. They were the parents of eleven children — Joseph, born October 18, 1736; Samuel, 1 Joseph Mott, " of Charlotte Precinct, Duchess County," wlio died in 1702, was iirobablj- a brother of tlie Jacob Mott, mentioned above. In his will, dated September 28, 1762, he leaves his farm, " Lot No. 3, in the Patent of Nine Partners," to his sons, Richard and Jacob. He mentions daughters, — Martha, wife of James Valentine ; Jane, wife of Timothy Smith ; Elizabeth, wife of Samuel Smith ; Jemima, wife of John Con- non. He also mentions " My loving brother Jacob, of Queens Co., li. I." May 31, 1738 (died young); Jackson, August 16, 1740; Isaac, May 6, 1743 (married Nancy Coles) ; Miriam, April 30,1745 (died in childhood); Ruth, June 6, 1747 (she married Jordan Lawrence, and after his decease married Stephen Coles); Samuel I., February 9, 1753; Jacob, June 30, 1756; Miriam, September 7, 1759 (married Benjamin Birdsall) ; Richard, May 9, 1769 (he married, first, Polly Sutton ; second, Freelove Sutton); and Joseph, August 21, 1763 (who removed to South Carolina). Jacob Mott, the eighth child of this family, mar- ried Deborah, daughter of Dr. William Lawrence, whose .ancestor, John Lawrence, was one of the com- missioners who were appointed to arrange the bound- aries of New Amsterdam in 1664, and whose descend- ants are among the most prominent of Long Island families. Removing from Hempstead, his native vil- lage, to New York, he was for many years one of its most prominent citizens, and was elected alderman of the Seventh Ward from 1804 to 1810, and was presi- dent of the Board of Aldermen and deputj' mayor of New York. Mott Street, in that city, was named in his honor. After a life of usefulness and credit, and vicissitudes as well, Mr. Mott died August 16, 1823, leaving a family of five children — William L., born January 16, 1777 (married Dorothy Scudder); Richard L., born June 6, 1782 (married Elizabeth Deal) ; Ja- cob L., born September 13, 1784 (married Hannah Riker and settled at Tarrytown, where he was a prominent preacher of the Society of Friends) ; Jor- dan L.; and Mary (wife of Ezekiel G. Smith). Jordan Lawrence Mott was born at Manhasset, L. I., October 12, 1798, during a temporary residence of his parents at that place, to which they had gone on account of an epidemic of yellow fever in New York. The affluent circumstances of his father rendered his early life one of ease and leisure, and he in youth developed that inventive genius which has since made his name so widely known. At the age of fifteen he invented a machine for weaving tape, which was suc- cessfully operated, and from that time till 1853, when he retired from business, was constantly engaged in various inventions,, and more than fifty patents are re- corded in his name. The business reverses which overtook his father rendered it necessary for him to engage in active labor for himself, and in 1820 he commenced commercial life as a grocer. At that time cooking-stoves were a recent introduction, the fuel being wood, which was then plentiful, and Mr. Mott invented the first cooking-stove in which anthracite was burned as a fuel. The comfort and convenience caused by this invention can hardly be over-estimated and .justly entitled him to the gratitude of the com- munity. The stove-castings were at that time made at blast furnaces in Philadelphia and were very rough. Mr. Mott built a cupola furnace and made his castings smooth and beautiful. The stoves made at his works soon became popular, and the small foundry, which was situated in the rear of A VIEW FROM WEST PIAZZA, MT. FORDHAM. MORRIS AN I A. 831 his store on Water Street, in New York, was the begin- ning of tlie famous Jordan L. Mott Iron-Works, the productions of which are now sent to every country on the globe. . The rapid increase of business led Mr. Mott to purchase an extensive tract of land at the northwest corner of the I\Ianor of Morrisania, on the Harlem River, and adjoining the Harlem Bridge at Third Avenue, and upon this spot soon arose the populous village of Mott Haven. The foundry was at first of limited extent ; the buildings were of wood and twice destroyed by fire, but were each time rebuilt with greatly enlarged proportions. It is narrated, as an il- lustration of the energy of Mr. Mott, that at the time of the second fire, while the firemen were endeavor- ing to subdue the flames at one end of the building, a company of workmen under his direction were laying the new foundations at the other, and in nine days the business was resumed. With a premonition of the rapid growth of the city of New York, Mr. Mott, in company with Colonel Nicholas McGraw and Charles W. Houghton, formed an association to purchase a large tract in Morrisania and establish a new village. An agreement was made with Gouverneur Morris, owner of the land, to sell a tract of two hundred acres for one hundred and seventy-five dollars per acre, which comprised lots from No. 16 to No. 23, inclusive, " as laid down on a map of Morrisania made by John Randall in 1816." This tract was surveyed and streets and avenues were located, and persons who bought lots received their deeds directly from Mr. Morris, the inheritor of the ancestral domain. The village thus established is now the thickly-settled Twenty -third Ward of the city of New York. Mr. Mott lived to see the business which he founded on a limited scale gradually increase till it became one of the largest establishments in the country and the creations of his inventive genius have made his name a household word. During the administration of President Buchanan he was offered the position of commissioner of patents, but declined to accept. The Reformed Dutch Church at Morri- sania, which he built and presented to the people, will be a lasting monument to his name. After a life of active and untiring usefulness he died May 8, 1866, and was buried in Greenwood Cemetery. He married Mary W. Smith, who was born Sep- tember 6, 1801, and died December 24, 1838. The children of this marriage were Mary J., wife of Matthew Dyckman Van Doran, whose children were Alice H., wife of Guy Fairfax Whiting, of Vir- ginia, and Amelia A., wife of General Edward H. Ripley, of Rutland, Vt., and Jordan L. Jordan L. Mott, who is the successor to the busi- ness established by his honored father, and which, under his care and skill, is continued with greatly in- creased facilities, was born November 10, 1829. De- prived of a mother's care in early childhood, he knew little of home life, being sent to school in Tarrytown ' at an an early age and finished his education at the University of the City of New York. The excitement that followed the discovery of gold in California led him to abandon college life, with the intention of seek- ing his fortune in that land of promise, and he wrote to his father, who was then in Washington, for his per- mission and assistance. Mr. Mott, with the practical shrewdness which distinguished him, made the follow- ing proposition to the young adventurer : " You can have the privations and the profits of a miner's life without going to California. You shall live in a tent in my garden, without seeing any of your friends or rela- tives, and holding no communications with them ex- cept by mail and at long intervals ; you shall do your own cooking and washing and mending. You will be deprived of all that now makes your life enjoyable, and in return I will pay you the average wages of a miner — about fifteen dollars a day. Or you can re- main at home in possession of the comforts you en- joy, with the prospect of succeeding to the business I have established." When these two pictures were presented in such vivid contrast the young man was not long in mak- ing his decision, and leaving the gold of California to be dug by other hands, he sought for wealth with equal energy, and doubtless far more success, in his native city. From that time it was the object of his life to es- tablish the works that bear his name on a firmer foundation, and increase their extent and capacity, and in the prosecution of this enterprise he has met with well-merited success. At the works at Mott Haven sixty tons of iron are now melted daily, — a vast increase, indeed, from the time when to melt two tons on alternate days was their full capacity. Taking an active interest in political affairs, Mr. Mott was elected alderman for the Twenty-third and Twenty-fourth Wards and was president of the board in 1879 and acting mayor of the city during the ill- ness of Mayor Cooper. At the conclusion of his term of ofiice Mr. Mott received an elegant testimonial, signed by the full Board of Aldermen, exi)ressing their high appreciation of the integrity and ability with which he had performed the duties of his offi- cial position. He was also one of the trustees of the village of Morrisania. Being appointed a mem- ber of the Rapid Transit Commission he was noted by his activity in promoting one of the improvements of the day. Prominent in social circles and widely known in business affairs, he is justly considered a representative of the successful men of the great metropolis. Mr. Mott married Marianna, daughter of James V. Seamen, of Westchester. Their children are Marie (wife of the late William I\I. Olliffe, park commis- sioner of New York), Jordan L., Jr. (who married Katharine Jerome, daughter of Fay Purdy, of West- ern New York, and has one child — Jordan L., the fourth of this name) and Augustus W. 832 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. The old homestead built by his father in the early days of Mott Haven, and standing at the corner of Third Avenue and One Hundred and Thirty-fourth Street, still remains in his possession. SAMUEL M. BIXBY. Among the magic titles of the present day, none has become such an universal household word as that of " Bixby," not alone in this country, but in all parts of the world. As a type of the American self-made business man, Samuel M. Bixby has secured a prominent position. He was born at Haverhill, N. H., May 27, 1833, and for many years past has been a resident of Fordham, Westchester County, N. Y. Those who are familiar with his reputation for energy and force of charac- ter can readily see, from a brief history of his origin, which was coupled with an early New England edu- cation, how he has been endowed with the elements that have made his success. From a man so full of information, and so keenly alive to the bent of events transi>iriug about him, it is not difficult to secure a fund of interesting matter that would be valuable not only to remote members of the Bixby family, but to people generally who have heard of him. Among the interesting memen- toes in his possession, of early New England days, is a rare " Book of Poems" (first published in 1650), by Anne Bradstreet, well remembered as the " Tenth Muse," or first American poetess, who is a grand- parent of Mr. Bixby through four generations. The name Bixby is of Danish origin, and the American Bixbys are descendants from Danish, Eng- lish and Scotch blood. Few families can boast of an ancestry more notable for all the qualities that go to make up the characteristics that rank highest in American character. They are lineal descendants of the lords of Dudley, families prominent in English history, and thence through the families of Governor Thomas Dudley and Governor Simon Bradstreet and many others of the noblest pioneers of New England. The family, which is large, is widely scattered throughout the United States, devoting themselves with the most remarkable energy to all the avocations of life in a new country and achieving success as law- yers, doctors, ministers, missionaries, manufacturers, merchants and tillers of the soil, and in every line they are remarkable for longevity, probitj' and inten- sity of purpose, strong will and determination, — char- acteristics which come from a hardy, strong and un- compromising ancestry. The meaning of the name Bixby is "the house or town near the box-trees." " By," means town, village or house; "bix" means the box — i. e., the tree by that name. Boxford, in Suffolk County, Mass., was planted and reared by the Bixbys. Boxford, — i. e., the ford by the box-trees — was the home of the emigrant, Joseph Bixby, and received its name from him. The first record of the Bixbys in this country is that of Nathaniel and Joseph Bixby, father and son, in the town of Ipswich, Mass., where Nathaniel is re- corded as a householder in 1638. From this date the father and son are readily traced, the son marrying, in 1647, a lady from Asing- ton, Suffolk County, England, and settling in Rowley village, afterward incorporated, under his leadership, as the town of Boxford. It is recorded that Joseph Bixby died, " being aged," in 1700. From Nathaniel and his son Joseph, the original immigrants, can be traced all the Bixbys at present known to exist in the United States, and they inhabit nearly every State and Territory. The oldest known to be living to-day is a lady past her ninety-ninth birthday, who is well preserved, mentally and physi- callj', and displays a degree of cheerfulness and great good humor rarely observed in aged people. In point of health, vigor and other characteristics, Samuel M. Bixby is a true type of his ancestors. His genial disposition, with the faculty of discerning the bright side of life, warrants the prediction of his en- joyment, for many years to come, of the success he has achieved. COLONEL RICHARD M. HOE. Among the names of American inventors whose discoveries have increased the welfare of the world, few deserve more honorable mention than the late Colonel Hoe, the inventor of the Lightning Printing- Press. Mr. Hoe was the head of the great firm of R. Hoe & Co., manufacturers of printing-presses. The history of this house, originally established by his father, and carried on from one success to another by his father's sons, is the history of the evolution of the art of printing, not only in America, but throughout the civilized world. Prior to the invention of the presses which bear the name of Hoe, the machinery by which the uses of " the types " are made manifest on paper was indeed slow-running and, in the light of the development of to-day, very crude. It was the Hoes who gave to the world, in 1847, the first rotary press ever known, and later, the wonderful Web Per- fecting Printing-Machines with which the press-rooms of the leading newspapers of the United States and Europe are now provided, and which, from an endless roll or web of paper, print, cut and fold twenty-four thousand eight-page papers an hour. The honor of having devised and invented this almost human machine, which has made the cheap newspaper a possibility, and completely revolutionized the world of printing, belongs jointly to Colonel Richard M. Hoe and Mr. S. D. Tucker, one of his partners. Although many years ago the mammoth business which he had inherited from his father had made him a wealthy man, abundantly able, had he seen fit, to retire from its active management. Colonel Hoe to the day of his death was the actual head and manager of the great manufacturing house, giving his time and MORRISANIA. 833 inventive brain abundantly to the development of the business. Robert Hoe, his father, and founder of the house of R. Hoe & Co., was a native of Lancashire, England, and was born at Hose, in 1784. At an early age he was apprenticed to learn the trade of a carpenter, but being of an ambitious disposition, he " bought his time " and came to New York at the age of nineteen. Arriving in the New World solitary and friendless, he accidentally met with the famous Grant Thorburn, who entertained him with hospitality and nursed him with care when prostrated with yellow fever. Some years after he married Rachel, daughter of Matthew Smith, of North Salem, Westchester County. His brother-in-law, Peter Smith, invented an im- proved printing-press, and he was engaged with him in the manufacture. When the news came of the in- troduction of the flat-bed cylinder press in England, Mr. Hoe sent a skilled workman to examine the new invention, and upon his return he extended his man- ufacturing operations. Robert Hoe died in 1833, at the age of forty-nine, leaving the business to his son, Richard jM. Hoe, whose name is now known world- wide as an inventor. He took his cousin, Matthew Smith, with Sereno Newton, as partners, and the firm- name was made R. Hoe & Co., which is still retained. Colonel Richard M. Hoe had inherited his father's inventive skill, and he also developed rare executive ability. The business under his management pros- pered apace. Invention after invention followed rapidly from his fertile mind. One of his first inven- tions, was a new method of grinding circular saws, a mode which is now in general use. In 1847 he made the great discovery which must ever rank him as one of the foremost inventors of the age, and invented the " Lightning Press,'" better known as the " Rotary Press," in which the type is fixed upon the circumfer- ence of a cylinder. By this means from ten to twenty- five thousand impressions could be made in an hour; the new printing-machine superseded the former styles, and the press of Franklin's days became a thing of the past. His great discovery was still further perfected bj' the invention of the Web Perfecting Press, which prints on both sidesof the paper, cuts it off and folds it, ready for the carrier, at the rate of twenty-four thousand copies an hour. When one sees this piece of mechan- ism in full running order, the thought that first arises is that in this machine human ingenuity and skill have reached their limit. The business of R. Hoe & Co. is of immense extent. A whole block on Grand Street, New York, is occupied with their manufac- tory, and the enterprise, which was begun on a very limited scale in 1805, in 188o employed over one thousand hands, and the whole world acknowledges their superiority in the manufacture of machinery for perfecting the " .\rt preservative of Arts." The children of Robert Hoe and Rachel Smith were Mary, wife of Rev. Ebenezer Seymour; Elizabeth, wife of Merlin Mead ; Emeline, wife of Giles S. Ely ; Rachel, wife of M. W. Dodd ; Theodosia, wife of Rev. William S. Leavitt ; Richard M., Robert and Peter S. Colonel Richard M. Hoe was born September 12, 1812, and married Lucy, daughter of Josiah Gilbert. Their children are Emily, wife of Cyrus J. Lawrence; and Adeline, wife of De Witt C. Lawrence, brother of the former. Colonel Hoe was married a second time, to Mary S., daughter of Henry E. Corbin, of Virginia. Their children are Annie C, Mary S., wife of J. Henry Harper, and Fannie B., wife of John Harper. Colonel Hoe purchased an estate at West Farms, of Christopher Spencer, about thirty years since. Upon this property he had an elegant residence, while the farm produces some of the finest specimens of blooded cattle that can be found in the county. The attitude of Colonel Hoe toward those in his employ may properly be held up as a model. Nearly thirty years ago he established an evening school for the apprentices in the manufactory, where free instruc- tion was given in those branches of study likely to be of the most practical service in properly developing their minds. For years he gave this school his per- sonal attention, and up to the day of his death was deeply interested in its conduct, firmly believing, as has been well said, that " the dittusion of knowledge among the working classes makes the man a better mechanic and the mechanic a better man." Personally, Mr. Richard M. Hoe is described by those who knew him intimately as having been a man of exceptionally cheerful temperament and gentle ways. He was devoted to his life-work, but at the same time was essentially domestic. He was a prom- inent member of St. Anne's Episcopal Church, situated near his residence. His name as an inventor, and the fame of the wonderful presses that he called into being, are known the world over. He died of heart- disease at Florence, Italy, in June, 1886. WILLIAM REYNOLDS-BEAL. William Reynolds-Beal, president of the Central Gas-Light Company of New Y''ork City, was born in Newark, New Jersey, May 18, 1838. His parents, Joseph R. and Elizabeth (Austen) Beal, were natives of England, and came to this country about 1830- His early life was passed in Newark, where he at- tended the school connected with Grace Episcopal Church, and graduated with high honor. His father, who was a man of education and intelligence, died at a comparatively early age, and the son, although ofi"ered a collegiate education, resolved to enter at once into active business. At the age of fourteen he became assistant in the office of the Newark Gas- Light Company, and afterwards removed to Eliza- beth, where he was assistant to the engineer who built the gas-works. In 1855 he went to Yonkers, Westchester County, and took charge of the works of the Yonkers Gas Company, where he remained for eleven years, and left the company in a very flour- 834 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. ishing condition. While in Yonkers he was also extensively engaged in business as a general contractor, and employed large numbers of men and horses in local contracts. Mr. Beal took the initiative in or- ganizing St. Paul's Episcopal Church, and assisted largely in building its church edifice, and was also a vestryman of the parish. In 1866 he removed to Morrisania and became con- nected with the Westchester County Gas-Light Com- pany, now known as the Central Gas-Light Company of New York City. From that time to the present, when Mr. Beal is the largest stockholder of the com- pany, he has made the advancement and extension of this enterprise the principal business of his life. During the past fifteen years he has been its presi- dent, and under his able management its business and prosperity have been very largely increased. He was also the builder of the works of the Northern Gas-Light Company in the Twenty-fourth Ward of New York City, and is the consulting engineer and one of the directors of that company. His thorough knowledge of the details of the business of illumina- tion by gas has enabled Mr. Beal to produce many inventions, whose value and usefulness are widely recognized. Among these may be mentioned "Beal's Hydraulic Main," which is now in use in several of the largest works of the country, while his latest invention is a " Scrubber " for purifying gas, which bids fair to secure recognition as a valuable improve- ment. Foreseeing the rapid growth of the Twenty-third Ward of the city of New York, Mr. Beal purchased extensive tracts of real estate, and is the owner of many houses in that district, and is also the president of a recently organized " Land and Improvement Company." He was largely instrumental in the establishment of St. Mary's Episcopal Church, which is built upon land formerly owne 1 by him. He is now a vestryman of St. Anne's Church, and intimately identified with its work. The cause of popular education has found in him an active and liberal promoter. For six years he was a member of the board of trustees of Rutgers Fe- male College, and is the present chairman of the board of school trustees of Morrisania. His connection with the public schools has been distinguished by the breadth of views which has been his characteristic in all other business affaii-s, and he has always felt an ardent interest in all that could advance their welfare and increase their usefulness. He has always been a strong advocate of the principles of the Republican party, but has declined repeated offers of nomination for political oflJce. He is a member of the Masonic order, and was one of the charter members of the Gavel Lodge of Morrisania, and is also well known as an enthusiastic member of the Knickerbocker Yacht Club and of other organizations. Mr. Beal married Miss Eleanor L., daughter of Thaddeus Bell, of Yonkers. Their children are Rey- nolds, Alice R., Thaddeus R., Mary R., Albert R. and Gifford R. Mr. Beal is a fair representative of the class of business men who, without the advantages of inher- ited wealth, have established both fortune and high reputation by their own activity, foresight and energy. His is a well-rounded character, and as a manufac- turer, inventor and mau of business he is well known as among the most active and energetic of the public- spirited citizens of the Twenty-third Ward of the city of New York. HUGH N. CAJtP. Hugh N. Camp, well known in the financial and social circles of New York, was born in Hanover, N. J., October 14, 1827, but has always resided in the city of New York. He is descended from an English family, which settled in Connecticut at a. very early date, and his ancestors removed to New Jersey in 1660, where his grandfather, William, and his father, Isaac B., were born. The latter married Jeanette Ely, of Hanover, and they were the parents of four sons and two daughters. Hugh N., the fourth son, obtained his early education in the public schools in New York. At the age of sixteen he found a i)osi- tion as clerk in the employ of Booth & Edgar, com- mission merchants, on Front Street. With them he remained eleven years, and in 1854, in company with E. W. Brunsen and Charles Sherry, Jr., established a sugar refinery at Bristol, R. I., upon a capital of forty thousand dollars, which was principally furnished by his former employers and Francis Skiddy. This was conducted very successfully till 1868, when the part- ners retired on account of ill health, and Mr. Camp, with two clerks as partners, continued the business until 1870, when the firm was compelled to suspend on account of financial reverses. Mr. Camp settled its affairs in a satisfactory manner, and in 1871 estab- lished a real estate business in New York, which he continued till 1883, when he relinquished it in order to give his time and attention to matters of more im- portance. In 1866 he became connected with the St Joseph Lead Company, and was elected treasurer. In 1882 he established the Lehigh Valley Cement Company, of which he is now president, and in 1884 became vice-president of the Title Guarantee and Trust Company of New York. Mr. Camp has long been prominently connected with many institutions of which New York is so justly proud, having been for twenty-seven years trustee and treasurer of the Five Points House of Industry and for twenty-eight years trustee of St. Luke's Hospital. He was also one of the directors of the Mercantile Library and secretary of Clinton Hall Association from 1862 till the present time. For eight years he was director of the Mechanics' Bank and for seven years director of the Mutual Life In- surance Company. He was also one of the origin- ators and first trustees of Woodlawn Cemetery and has MORRISANIA. 835 been for several years a member of the Chamber of Commerce. Prominently connected with the Republican party, he has been a member of the Union League from its commencement. He is also one of the oldest j members of the Century (^lub, so well known in liter- ary and artistic circles. In he purchased an estate in Westchester County. This place, which has since been his home, is situated on the north side of the highway leading from Morris' Dock to the old Mc( 'omb's Dam road, and is a portioti of the Morris farm in the old Manor ot Fordham. Taking an active interest in the cause of education, he was for six years president of the School Board in the town of West Farms. He is a member and an active and liberal supporter of St. James' Episcopal Church at Fordham and one of the present vestry. In 1SH3 he was ai)|)ointed by iNIayor Edson, of New York, a member of the Aqueduct Commission to de- termine as to the necessity of a new aqueduct and to decide upon the route and nuinner of building, a po- sition of great importance and responsibility. Mr. Camp married Elizabeth D., daughter of John McKesson, of New York, in 1854. They are the parents of eight children, seven of whom are still living, — Edward B., Maria L. (wife of P. P. Williams), John McK., Frederick E., Alice, Emily, Hugh N., Jr., and William H. In the social, financial and political society of New York the name of Mr. Camp is widely known and justly po[)ular. There are few who can boast of a more extensive acquaintance or a more intimate knowledge with the varied phases of life and manners as they are seen in the great city. COLONKI; M. O. DAVIIISON. Colonel Davidson was born in Plattsburg, ('lintoii County, N. Y., March 28, 1819, and at the time of his death, September 1, 1872, was nearly fifty-four years of age. Me was a son of Dr. Oliver Davidson and Margaret !\I. Davidson, and was one of a gifted family, his sis- ters Margaret and Lucretia having attracted much attention from the literary world of their time by their brilliant poetical eflbrts. His professional career and services began in his eighteenth year- One of his first appointments was on the Croton .\queduct, where he served some years. He was sub- seiiuently em[)loyed upon the Erie Railway, and after that upon a road in Canada. Thence he went to t/uba in 1842, remaining there nearly a year on the Coliseo Railroad. Upon his return to this country, in 1843, and for ten yeare after, he was engaged in the Cumberland coal region . of Maryland, which he was principally instrumental in developing. While there he constructed an inclined plane, opened and worked the mines, and made many experiments in machinery and in the combustion of coal that have been of value to the profession. In the year 1857 Colonel Davidson went to Havana, Cuba, under an ap[)ointment as engineer-in-chief of the Havana Railways, an office he filled with great credit to himself and advantage to the company, until he resigned his position in the year 18fi8. During the |)eriod Colonel Davidson was in Cuba he reconstructed the entire length of the nearly worn- out road, some one hundred and ten miles long, ele- vating it from a condition of almost complete use- lessness to a first-class railway in all respects. The improvements introduced by him covered everything relating to permanent way, bridges, passenger, freight and water stations, as well as a complete revolution in equipment. He also constructed thirty-six miles of new and heavy line, reflecting great credit upon him- self, especially for his wisdom and energy in com- pleting in time some heavy rock-cutting and bridg- ing, when a failure as to time would have been equal to loss of franchise to the company. During his stay in Cuba he was often called upon to arbitrate delicate questions between conflicting in- terests, and his decisions were always looked upon as perfect and just solutions of the difficulties to be set- tled. Shortly after Colonel Davidson's return from Cuba he was ap|)ointed chief engineer and superintendent of the Arizona Mining Company. He was in Arizona between two and three years in the exercise of these duties, and was at the same time United States Indian agent for the Territory. In the years 18()5 and 1866 he was much occupied in the (]uestion of rapid transit for the city of New York, and was commissioned to proceed to London to observe and report upon the system of constructing and operating the underground railways in use there. In 1867 he was named chief engineer of the New Haven and Derby Railroad, a short line involving many interesting points in location and construction, which be treated in the most successful manner. From the year 1867 to the time of his death he was engaged in public works in Westchester County, N. Y., embracing a system of avenues, which he skill- fully developed as chief engineer, and which have been of great value to the county. In 1869 and 1870 a portion of his attention was taken up in the consideration of such questions as the construction of the Shore Line Railway Bridge across the Connecticut River and in the project of the Hudson River Highland Suspension Bridge, sub- mitted to boards of engineers, of which he was a member. In concluding this sketch much might be said touching the excellent traits of character he pos- sessed in a pre-eminent degree, endearing him to all with whom he came in contact. In his public life as a civil engineer he was an 836 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. ornament to the profession, and in his private life he was the model of a Christian gentleman. HENRY B. HALL. Henry B. Hall was born in London March 11, 1808, and at the age of fourteen was articled as a pupil to Benjamin Smith, known by his works for " Boydell's Shakespeare (Jallery." After completing his studies with Mr. Smith he was engaged by Henry Mycr, the favorite engraver of Sir Thomas Lawrence, from whom he derived much benefit in his profession. He was subsequently engaged for four years with H. T. Ryall, Engraver to the Queen, and during that time engraved all the portraits in the large plates of that engraver, including the very celebrated one entitled " Corona- tion of Queen Victoria," after Sir George Hayter. For many years Mr. Hall's thoughts had been at- tracted towards the United States as a new and great field for art, and in the year IRoO he, with his eldest son, made a visit to New York City, leaving the re- mainder of his family in England. Soon after his ar- rival in New York he was met in a most friendly spirit by many artists and publishers of note, and a'uong the latter the late G. P. Putnam, who, in addi- tion to being among the great publishers of that time, was a devoted patron of art, and such offers were made to Mr. Hall as determined him upon making his home liere. His family joined him the following fall and he settled in Hoboken until the spring of 1851, when he removed to Morrisania and occupied a house on Un- ion Avenue, near Wall Street, Woodstock. In 1854 he purchii«ed a house on George Street, near Boston Avenue, where he i):issed the remainder of his life, and died on April 25, 1885. Among his well-known portraits, for which he was particularly noted, are twelve separate portraits of Washington, after all the celebrated artists and sculp- tors; and etchings of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, done Ibr private parties and printed exclusively for their use; also an etching of the well- known American composer, George F. Bristow, and one of himself, in 1872, which is the best likeness extant. His larger works were very numerous, including " Washington and family after hunting," and " AVash- ington at Jlount Vernon." Mr. Hall had eight children — four sons and four daughters: Anne, married Ed. H. Knight, and died in Brooklyn in 1858 and her husband in 1872, leaving a son, Ed. H. (now a resident of ]\Iorrisauia), and two daughters; Emily, married William Momberger, of Morrisania, a lithographic artist and designer ; Henry B., living in Morrisania, married and has three cliil- dren living; Charles B. (same), has five children; Alfred B. (same), has five children ; Ernest (same), has three children ; Alice and Eliza, unmarried, all living in Morrisania. Henry B., Charles B. and Alfred B. are all engrav- ers and have been established in business together for many years, and are now located at 22 Park Place, New York. Erne.st is a justice of the City Court of New York and worthily represents the old township. All the sons and daughters have remained near to- gether in Morrisania and have for many years been identified with its growth. CHAPTER XXII. WEST FARMS.' BY FORDHAM MORRIS. The town of West Farms was formed from the town of Westchester by the act of Assembly of May 13, 1846. It lies upon the Sound and along Harlem River in the southern part of the county. Bronx River forms its eastern boundary and Mill Brook flows through its centre. The surface is rolling, the ridges extending north and south. Within its bound- aries are the villages of West Farms, Fordham, Wil- liams' Bridge, Tremont, Fairnioiuit, Belmont, Clare- mont, Monterey, Mount Eden, Mount Hope and Woodstock. In 1874 it was annexed to New York City, and the extension of streets and railways is rapidly converting it from a suburban to an urban community. It originally embraced the town of Mor- risania, which was set off from it in 1855. Within | its boundaries are r.umerous splendid residences, some tine church edifices and denominational institu- tions. Andrew Findlay was tlie first, and Francis Bar- retto the second, supervisor elected in West Farms after its creation as a town. In 1847 the num- ber of residents subject to taxation was- returned as 270 and the sissessed valuation of propeity as $1,193,920. In 1848 the taxables numbered 341 and the assessment amounted to $1,282,570, producing a tax of $7094. Andrew Findlay was elected suj)er- visor in 1848 and 1849. In the latter year the taxa- bles had increased to 659 and the property valuation to $1,391,150, the tax being i:8435. John B. Haskin served as supervisor in 1850 and 1851. West Farms then had 1114 inhabitants and their property was as- sessed at $l, So in th« deed. He was a sod of Bobert Penoyer the original gran- tee. ' Ancient copy in writer's poeseasion, Bee. Lib. C. West. Co. p. 52. ' The original instmment camo into the possession of the GrifTen Fam- ily who purchased Xo. ti from John Bloodgood, and now belongs to Mr. Charles Field Griffen to whom I am indebted for its examination. A facsimile coteiniwrHry copy is in my own possession. 856 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. Highway they left at the South end of their " Great Lotts " or " Long Lots " was found to be useless, and the owners subsequently divided it up into nine small lots of about 10 acres each among themselves which ended the whole matter. These " Great " or " Long " Lots, as well as the small ones are all shown on the Map of the Manor of Scarsdale in this volume. They never belonged to any body but the grantees of the eight original house lots to which they were append- ant and appurtenant, and with their division by the owners of those lots among themselves all their com- mon rights ended, and the "two mile bounds" or " Mammaroneck Limmits " come to an end forever. The Proprietary rights in them of Colonel Heathcote of course were terminated by his agreeing to their di- vision in fee. Of the owner of the " allottments or house Lotts " as they were in 1701 the descendants of none except of Colonel Heathcote are now in possession of any part of them, although descendants of Hattfield and the DISBROW HOUSE, ERECTED 1677. Disbroughs are still well known residents and prop- erty holders in other parts of the present Town of Mamaroneck, among whom is Mr. William H. Dis- brow as the name is now spelled, the Civil Engineer whose home is scarcely a musket shot from the old an- cestral house. But there still stands upon the south- ern part of the " House Lott " of Henry Disbrough the identical house he built there in 1677 the year after he was deeded the lot by John and Ann Rich- bell, a memento of the earliest days of Mamaroneck, of the old family who built it, of New York and Westchester in the reign of Charles the Second, and of the Duke of York as its Lord Proprietor. It remained in the Disbrough family till within thirty or thirty- five years, and is now the property of the widow of the late well known Publisher of New York, Mr. Stringer of the firm of Stringer & Townsend. The accompa- nying cut gives a good idea of it but it is a rear view, the road shown in it and now existing in front of the house not having been opened till the year 1800. It faced the harbour, the side toward the present Union avenue, which at this place is built upon the old Westchester Path, being the original front of the house. It is built of rough hewn timber, and the coarse stone of the country even to the chimney above the roof. The siding has been renewed but always in the old style. It has long been used simply as a store- house as it was understood when it passed out of the Disbrough family that it should never be pulled down. Its last owners of the name were two maiden ladies who, a few years before their deaths built in the same enclosure the present new and good frame house, which stands almost between the old one and the waters of the harbour. The old house has well borne its 209 years but in the course of things can not last much longer. The " Middle Neck " or the " Great Neck " or " Munro's Neck " as it was styled after Mr. Peter Jay Munro became the owner of nine-tenths of it about the year 1790, has a curious history. But before it is given it may be better, though a little out of order, to state the facts more fully than they have been mentioned in treating of the Manor of Scarsdale, re- garding the Pell-Richbell controversy about the West Neck. Both the Middle and the West Necks to- gether form that part of Richbell's land, now in the town of Mamaroneck, which lay almost wedge shaped between the southern parts of the Manors of Scarsdale and Pelham. The West Neck extended from the Cedar Tree or Gravelly Brook, (that now running to the west of Mr. Meyer's present house,) westward to another Brook, which was that which crossed the Westchester Path or Road just west of the present residence of Mr. Geo. Stephenson, and upon which for years stood a mill, for a very long time a snufF mill. This brook bore the name of Stony or Gravelly brook. Mr. Pell claimed that his eastern line was the Cedar Tree or Gravelly Brook, that now by the present Mr. Meyer's ; Mr. Rlchbell claimed that the Stony or Gravelly Brook, also called Cedar or Gravelly Brook, that near Mr. Stephenson's, was his western line and Pell's eastern line. The controversy was a very hot one and grew out of the use of similar designations of stream* in their respective Patents. After proceedings in the Court of Assizes, and before the Governor and Council the following Agreement was finally entered into by both parties ; " Whereas There hath been a Matter or cause of Difference depending between Mr. John Richbell and Mr. John Pell for the which There was an order Issued forth from y* Governor for a tryall by a Special Court of Assizes yet Notwithstanding upon proposal of an amicable agreement between them, and to prevent further trouble to his Honour the Governour and the Country by having a speciall Court, it is this Day mutually consented unto and agreed upon, that the Neck of Land and meadow be- tween Ceeder or Gravelly brooke on the East, and Gravelly or Stony Creeke on y"" West shall be layed out by y*" Surveyor Generall and devided between them, so that each party shall have Meadow and up- land equivalent and proportionable Quantity and MAMARONECK. 857 Quality alike. To this agreement both partys do joyntly consent in token of Amity and Friendship buri- ing in oblivion what unkindness hath formerly past between them and this to be a barr to all future Claymes or pretences that can or may be made on either side or by either of y"' heires Executors or Ad- ministrators for ever. As to what expense or charge*^ Either party hath been at Each is to bear his own charges, but for the charges of the Surveys and such other Necessary expenses Relating to the Division of y" Lands according to this agreement it is Equally to be Borne betweene them. In testimony Whereof the party es to these presents have Later changeably Sett to their hands and Seals y" 22 Daye of January in the 23* year of his Maj' Reigue Annoq*" Dom. 1671 John Pell (L S) ' Sealed and Delivered in y'' presence of Henry Taylor Allard Anthony Remains (as all other Lawful Acts) of forces and There Surveyor may proceed accordingly E. Andros " Though thus confirmed by the above order of Gov. Andros, no survey was made, why it is now impossi- ble to say, until the 22" of May 1677, when it was done by Robert Ryder. His description is in these words ; — Whereas there hath been a difference between John Richbell and ^\r. .John Pell which by virtue of an order from the right Honourable Major Edmund An- dross Esq'. Governor General of New York, I have made a division of the within mentioned Neck of Land by and with the mutual consent of both par- ties, which is in manner and Form as is hereafter Expressed viz'. That the said Richbell shall extend from Cedar Tree Brook or Gravelly Brook, south westerly fifty degrees to a certain mark't Tree, lying above the now Common Road, thirty and four chains in length, mark on the east with R. and on the West with P., thence Extending South Sixty three degrees East by certain marked Trees p'fixed Ending by a certain piece of Meadow at the salt creek which Runs up to Cedar Tree Brook or Gravelly Brook Extend- ing from the first marked Trees Nor Nor West to Brunkes River by certain Trees in the said Line marked upon the West with P. and upon the east with R. performed the twenty-second day of May 1()77. p me Robert Ryder Surv.'"^ The Preceding Surveyor above mentioned is mu- tually consented unto by the above mentioned Mr. John Richbell and Mr. John Pell in presence of us Thomas Gibbs Walter Webly John Sharj) Joseph Carpenter > This is from an ancioot Ck)py of the document signed by Pell that was delivere. Henry JIunro. 18:11-32. James H. Guion. 1833-34. Monmouth Lyon. 183.'i^2. James H. Guion. 1843-45. Benjamin M. Brown. 1846. Stephen C. Griffen. 1847-49. Benjamin M. Brown. 1850. James H. Guion. 1851. Charles W. Hopkins. 1852. Louis Walsh. 1853. Zachariah Voorhees. 1854. Louis Walsh. 1856-58. .lobn Morrell. 1859-60. William L. Barker. 1861. Louis Walsh. 1862-64. Jona.s D. Hill. 1865-66. Louis Walsh. 1867. Jacob B. Humphrey. 1868. Schureman Hal-sted. 186ft-70. Thomaii L. Rushmore. 1871. James J. Burnet. 1872-76. Charles H. Birney. 1877. Matthias Banta, who hna been continually re-elei ted to the present year, 1886, and for the last few years by a unanimous vote of all parties, although he is a strong Democrat. 16'.l7-99. William Palmer. 1702. Obadiah Palmer. 1708-15. Eliezer Gedney. 1718-54. Nehemiab Palmer. Town Ci.erk.s. 1755-65. 'William .Mott. 1706-70. John Townsend. 1771-1806. Gilbert Budd. 1807-16. Dr. David Rogers, Jr.< ' Died 1742. Kehcmiah Palmer was elected supervisor in his stead. 'Elected in the place of John Stevenson, who had removed from the town. ^The candidates for supervisor in 1814 wore Henry Merritt and John Pinkney. The result of the election was contested, and in June, 1814, the justice of the [wace appointed Mr. De Lancey suiwrvisor. * Dr. Rogers and Gilltert Budd Horton were tlie candidates for town clerk in 1814. \ contest took place between them over the result of the 1817-24. Monmouth Lyon. 1825-26. Guy C. Bayley. 1827. Coles Tompkins. 1828-30, Monmouth Lyon. 18;U. Daniel D. T. Ha.ldeii. 1832-34. Walter Marshall. 1835. Horace B. Slaat. 1830. Amos F. Hatfield. 1837-11. EpenetusC. Hadden. 1842-45. Elijah G. Dixon. 1846 47. Edward Seaman. 1848. George Baxter. 1849-53. Edward Seaman. 1854-56. Josei)h Hoffnuin. 1857-58. Edward Seaman. 1859. Joseph Hoffman. 1860-61. Edward Seaman. 1862-64. Joseph Hoffman. 1865-66. Albert Lyon. 1867-li9. Jonas D. Hill. 1870. Albert Lyon. 1871. Jacob Buckler. 1872. John N. Boyd. 1873-74. Francis C. Corner. 187.'>-76. William A. Boyd. 1877. John C. Fairchild. 1S78-79. Joseph H. McLouKlilin. 1880. William A. Sickles. 1881. Joseph H. Mi Loughliu. 1882. William H. Lange. 1883. William A. Sickles. 1884-86. William H. Lange. Space will not permit the introduction of much curi- ous information contained in the town records which it was the intention to give, and which is found mixed up with the routine entries of town meetings, &c. &c. The following entry however is of much iui])ort:ince showing as it does the burial place of John Richbell the first white man who bought Mamaroneck of the natives — the Father of the Town, his mother in law, and one of his daughters. As J\lrs. Richbell his widow continued to live in Mamaroneck and sur- vived till the first years of the eighteenth century, though the precise date of her death can not be found, it is most probable that she too is buried with her husband. There is no date to the entry, which shows beside the intimacy between the Richliell and the Disbrow families. The James Mott who makes this declaration was the husband of Richbell's daughter Mary whose burial is mentioned in it. The Burial Place of Itichbell. " I James Mott do give and grant to Margaret Dis- brow and her three sons Henery John and Benjamin all belonging to Moinoronack to them and their fam- ylies forever the Liberty of burying their dead, whether Father or Mother, husband or wife, brother or sister, son or daughter, in a certain peace of Land Laying near the Salt Meadow, where Mr. .Joiin Rich- bell and his wife's Mother, and my wife Mary Mott was buried in my home lot or feild adjoining to my house, written by William palmer Clerk of Momoio- nack by order of Capt James Mott." I. Town Records 71. The spot is on the property of Mr. Thomas L. Rushmore on the little knoll between the Harbour and De Lancey Avenue, marked by a few trees and a few half buried tombstones of a comparatively late date. How many of the Disbrows are buried there nought remains to tell. They have had for sixty or seventy years a cemetery of their own on West St. The last person whom the writer knows to have been buried on the knoll, was the venerable Quaker who once owned the farm and the knoll itself. Seaman Giles — and of whom he has a vivid recollection. It is the election, which \>a« terminated in June of that year by the justices of the peace electing Dr. Rogera to the oftice. 862 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. oldest burial place of civilized man in the town, and it is hoped that some proper historic monument may yet mark this spot so sacred in the memory of the earliest settler of Mamaroneck and his family and friends. There is one other entry in the town book of such an odd nature that it must be mentioned, an entry which shows the strength of an agricultural supersti- tion very prevalent in the last centurj' and which may linger still in some old fashioned regions. . "April 5"', 1785. The Freeholders and Inhabitants agree that the overseers of Highways are impowered to call on all the Men in their several Districts for the purpose of Destroying the Barbery bushes, so often as the said overseers shall think proper, until the whole are destroyed, any man refusing to come, if he is legally warned, shall forfeit -is. for every day, to be recovered in the same manner as the fines for neglect of working the roads are, which lines shall be lay'd out as the overseers think proper." It was the popul ir belief of that day that the smut or blight in wheat and other grains was caused by these unfortunate barberry bushes, hence in Mamaroneck as in many other places, ridiculous as it seems at this day, they were proceeded agaiust as public enemies. The de Lanceys of New York so closely connected with the Province, and State, and the County of West- chester, are of French origin, the first of them in America having been driven from France by the Re- vocation of the Edict of Nantes, being a Huguenot. The annexed account of this family is mainly from Bolton's second edition of his History of West- chester County, whicli was drawn up from the au- tiiorities referred to in it, and later information from the late Bishop de Lancey and the present writer. The de Lanceys of New Y'ork, are a branch of the ancient house of de Lancey in France, springing from Guy de Lancey, Ecuyer, Vicomte de Laval et de Nouvion, who in 1432, held of the Prince-Bishop of the Duchy of Laon, the fiefs of the four banier of La- val, and that of Nouvion.' These territories formed one of the fourVicomte-cics of the Laonnois, a divi- sion of the old province of the " Isle of France," bordering on Picardy. The manuscript genealogies of this family are pre- served in the Armorial General de la France 2d Reg- ister, 2d volume, in the National Library of France' at Paris, and in the archives of the department of the Aisne, at the city of Laon. The latter have been given in the Dictionnaire Historique du Depart- ment de' I'Aisne of M. Melville.^ The descent is thus given from the French authorities.* 1 Sometimes spelled *' Noiivian." These lands and villages are situated a few miles from the city of L.aon in the present department of the Aisne. 2 The official MSS. of this work, the great National Register of the Trench Noblesse, were firat printed by order of Louis XV., in 17:i8. 3 In two vols. 8vo., published at Paris ami at Laon in 1SU5. *he Nobiliaire de Picardie, Paris, ICOli, title "Lanei," Dictionnaire de The prefixed Roman numerals are so used in the French genealogies to denote the different in- dividuals bearing the same Christian name. 1432. Guy de Lancy, Ecuyer * Vicomte de Laval et de Nouvion. Wife, Anne de Marcilly. 1436. Jean I, (John) de Lancy, 2d Vicomte. 1470. Jean II, (John) de Lancy, 3d Vicomte, Deputy to the States General at Tours in 1484, present at the battles Fornoue and Ravvenna. 1525. Charles I, de Lancy, 4th Vicomte. Wives, 1. Nicole St. Pere, issue, one daughter, mar- ried Antoine Pioche, of Laon. 2. Marie de Villiers, issue two sons, Charles 6th Vicomte, and Christophe, Seigneur de Raray. 1535. Charles II, de Lancy, 5th Vicomte. Wife, Isa- bel Branche, married 15th April, 1534 ; issue, Charles 6th Vicomte, Jacques (James) Claude, and a daughter Barbe. 1569. Ciiarles III, de Lancy, 6th Vicomte. Wives, 1. Madeline Le Brun, married 21st of July, 1569 ; issue, Charles IV., de Lancy, Seigneur de Coc- quebine, (who died in 1667, leaving by Francoise Crochart, his first wife; Charles V, de Lancy, Seigneur de Charlemont, who died unmarried. By his second wife Marthe de Resnel,. the Seigneur de Cocquebine, who was created a Coun- sellor to the King, 20th of March, 1652, by whom he had no children.) Charles III, de Lancy, 6th Vicomte, was pres- 1590. ent at the battle of Ivry in 1590. 2. By his second wife Claude de May, married 15th Janu- 1593. ary, 1593, he had issue, Charles de Lancy, Sieur de Suine et de Niville, Antoine, a Canon of the Cathedral of Laon, and Claude. 1611. Charles de Lancy, Sieur de Suine et de Niville, 1653. born in 1611, married 25th June, 1653, Jeanne Ysore, was created a Counsellor of State to the 1689. King in 1654, and died 23d of November, 1689, leaving issue, one child, — Charles Ambroise de Lancy, Seigneur de Ni- 1702. ville et du Condray, de Frenoi, et d'Orgemont, who married 9th January, 1702, Marie Made- leine Labbe. He was confirmed in his nobility 1697. by a decree of the King in Council, Nov. 30th, 1697. He had issue, an only son, — 1707. Pierre Charles de Lancy, Seigneur de Niville et de Blarus, born 5th of June, 1707 ; an officer of 1750. the King's Guards, who died unmarried in 1750. Christophe de Lancy, Signeur de Raray, above named, the younger of the two sons of Charles de Lancy 4th, Vicomte de Laval et de 1525. Nouvion, created Baron de Raray, having no issue by his first wife, Barbe de Louen, married 1553. Secondly, January 19th, 1553, Francoise Lami, daughter of Pierre Lami, Seigneur de la Morliere. la Noblesse de France, by Chenaye Desbois, vol. viii : title "Lancy;" An- nuaire de la Noblesse of Borel d'Hauterive for 1855, " Lancy— Raray." ^ Ecuyer, denotes a gentleman entitled to use coat armor. MAMAROXECK. 863 1584. He died in 1584, leaving ii son Nicholas de Lancy, second Baron, Treasurer of Gaston, first Dnke of Orleans who married Lucrece dc Lancise, a Florentine lady, and had four chil- dren. 1. Henry de Lancy, third Baron, who 1654. was created January 17th, 1G54, Marquis De Rarai. 2. Francois de Lancy, Seigneur D'Ara- mont, called the Chevalier de Raray, who was killed at the siege of Conde, 17th August, 1()74, unmarried ; and 3. Charles de Lancy, Seigneur de Rihecourt, et Pimpre, who married Made- leine d'.\guesseau and died without issue in 1G75. 4. Madeleine de Lancy, married 11th Novem- ber, 1()19, Charles de Mornay, Seigneur deMont- chevreuil. Henry de Lancy, above named, 1st Marquis de Raray, married January 3()th, 1633, Catharine d'Angennes, daughter of Louis d'Angennes, Seigneur de la Loupe and his wife Francoise, daughter of Odet, Seigneur d'Auberville, Bailly of the city of Caen, in Normandy, by whom he had, 1. Gaston Jean Baptiste de Lancy, 2d Mar- quis ; 2. Charles de Lancy-Raray, killed at the siege of Lille, in 1667, unmarried ; and 3. Marie Charlotte, wife of Louis des Acres, Marquis de I'Aigle, who died in Paris, August 27th, 1734, aged 82 years.' 1660. Gaston Jean Baptiste de Lancy, second Mar- quis de Raray, married 4th May, 1660, Marie Luce Aubery, daughter of Robert, Marquis de Vatan, and had two sons, Charles Henry de Lancy, third Marquis, made a page to the King 1679. in 1679, who died shortly after, unmarried, and Gaston Jean Baptiste de Lancy, who succeeded his brother as fourth Marquis and died unmar- ried not long after. Both these brothers died 1680. in 1680 ; and with them ended the males of this branch of the family. Their sisters were five, Henriette, wife of the Marquis de Creve- coeur ; Catharine, wife of the Seigneur de la Bil- larderie;^ Francoise, died unmarried; Annette, died unmarried, and Marie Luce, wife of the Comte de Nonant, who died 16th March, 1743, aged eighty. ' Lc Palais d'LUonucur, Paris, 1664, page ;112, family " d'Angennes." 2 In front of the altar at the Cburch of Vrelieric, (de|)artnieiit of Oiso, Franco), tbure is a tombstone erected to this lady, inscribed : — D. O. M. let repose Haute etpiiissaute Danio Madame Francoise nr. Lanci Uari, dame Des Torres et Seigneiiries, d'Hanuuont, Kibecoiirt, I'impre St. Oenniiin ot Ruy, en |uirtie Ch;itelaino Hereditaire et engsigiste des Donmines de Bollii/y ct A'erberie, jtossides pjir ses jR'res de puispliis deux cents ans veuve de ile^ire IJartbelemi tie FlabautClievelier seigneur dc la nillarderie Maitre de camp de Cavalcrie. exempt des gardes du cor|« du Boi tue a la batalle de Mai plaquet. La dite Dame de la Billardorieest decedee la :i.'> Juin, 16J4. agree de 61 ans. Priez puur son fune The Arms are blazoned in the "Armorial General de la France," thus, " AuMES; or, a I'aigle eployee de sable, charge sur Testomac d'un ecusson d'azur, a trois lances d'or, posces en pal, pointes en haut." In English, Akms: Or, an eagle wings dis- played, sable, charged on the breast with a shield azure, three tilting lances or, in i)ale, i)oints ujjward. On becoming a British subject, Ktienne (or Ste- phen) de Lancy modified these arms which had originated before the use of crests in heraldry, to make them more like those of English families, most of which have crests ; and though not registered in the English College of Arms, they appear as so modi- tied in most English heraldic works, and have since been so borne in America, notably on the oHicial seal of his son James de Lancey, as Lt. Governor and Captain General of New York. They are thus blaz- oned Ar.ms ; Azure, a tilting lance proper, point up- ward with a pennon argent bearing a cross gules fringed and floating to the right, dcbruised of a fess, or. CuKST ; a sinister arm in armor embowed, the hand gnispinga tilting lance, pennon floating, both proper. Motto ; Certum voto pete finem. The name of this family, anciently spelled " Lanci," and later " Lancy," in France, was anglicised by Etienne de Lancy on being denizenizcd a British sub- ject in 1686, after which time he always wrote his name Stephen de Lancey — thus inserting an " e" in the final syllable. The " de" is the ordinary French prefix, denoting nobility. The Seigneur Jacques (James) de Lancy, above- named, second son of Charles de Lancy, fifth Vicomte de Laval et de Nouvion, was the ancestor of the Huguenot branch, the only existing one, of this fam- ily. His son the Seigneur Jacques de Lancy of Caen, married Marguerite Bertrand, daughter of Pierre Ber- trand of Caen, by his first wife, the Demoiselle Firel, and had two children, a son Etienne (or Stephen) de Lancey, born at Caen, October 24, 1663, and a daugh- ter, the wife of John Barbarie. ' On the revocation of the edict of Nantes, Stephen de Lancey was one of those who, stripped of their titles and estates, fled from persecution — leaving his aged mother, then a widow, in concealment at Caen, he escaped to Hol- land, where, remaining a short time, he proceeded to England, and taking out letters of denization as an English subject at London, on the 20th of March, 1686, he sailed for New York, where he arrived on the 7th of June following. Herewith three hundred pounds sterling, the jirocecds of the sale of some family jewels, the parting gift of his mother, he em- barked in mercantile pursuits. By industry and strict application to business, he became a successful mer- ^MSS., "Bertrand" Gene.ilogy ; — John Uarbarieand his family came to New York in 16«8, in which year (on .ilh January), he and his sods Peter, and John Peter, were denizened as English subjects in Lomlun. He wa.s subsequently a merchant in New York, in partnership with his brother-in-law, Stephen de Lancy, and a member of the Council of the Province. 864 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. chant and amassed a large fortune. He was a highly esteemed and influential man, and held, through all his life, honorable appointments in the councils of the city, as well as in the Representative Assembly of the Province. He was elected Alderman of the west ward of the city, live years after his arrival, in 1691. He was representative from the city and county ol' New York, in the Provincial Assembly, from 1702 to 1715, with the exception of 1701t ; and in 1725, on the decease of Mr. Provoost, he was elected again to that body. The following year he was re-elected, and con- tinued in olEce until 1737; a service of twenty -six years in all. In 1716, being a vestryman of Trinity church, he contributed £50, the amount of his salary as Representative to the General Assembly, to buy a city clock for that church, the first ever erected in New York. To him and Mr. John Moore, his part- ner, the city is also indebted for the introduction ol' fire engines, in 1731. ' He wa.s one of the principal benefactors of the French church, Du St. Esprit, es- tablished in New York by the refugees who fled upon the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, and a warm friend of the French Huguenot* at New Rochelle. The following letter addressed by him, 1591, to hit- friend Alexander Allaire, is still preserved among the public records at New Rochelle. XlKl YiiBli, I.K -JT Jl LIET, IfiOl. SIoNS. Allaire : Monsieur Notri* Amy 3Ions. Boithciler, avant de partir nie vti Hketdi. 872 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. cincts of the Parish of Rye, one of the two territorial parishes erected in Westchester County in the former year under the Act establishing parishes of the Church of England within the Counties of New York and Westchester passed March 24, 1693,' an act which with several amendments made in later years continued in force till repealed by the Legislature of the State in the year 1784, just about a huTidred years. The Estab- lishment of the Church of England within the Prov- ince of New York and its Parochial organization in Westchester County will be found fully described in Parts 10, and 11, of the chapter on Manors in this vol- ume.^ The Inhabitants of the Parish of Rye elected Church wardens and Vestrymen, and paid the charges authorized by law during this whole period. Their duties besides those of seeing to the proper religious Services in the parish churches, were also those in re- lation to assessments taking care of the poor, and other duties now performed by town officials. During his residence here Colonel Heathcote was usually chosen a vestryman and often a Warden. The fir^t election under the act of 1693 we know was held pur- suant to the summons of Justice Theall under the law at Rye on the 28th February 1694-5. John Lane and John Brondig (Brundige) were elected church Wardens, and Jonathan Hart Joseph Horton, Joseph Purdy, Timothy Knapp, Hachaliah Brown, Thomas Merritt, Deliverance Brown, and Isaac Den- ham, vestrymen.' In 1702 is the record of another election, when on the 12"' of January at a lawful town meeting in the Precinct of Rye Colonel Caleb Heathcote and the Justice Theall (who summoned the meeting of the Inhabitants for the election of 1695) were elected Church Wardens, and Justice Purdy, Justice Mott, Capt. Horton, Deliverance Brown, Hachaliah Brown, George Lane, Sen., Thomas Purdy, Thomas Disbrow, Isaac Denham, and Samuel Lane, were elected vestrymen for the ensuing year. * These elections will be found mentioned in Baird's History of Rye, chapter 24th, from which I have taken the particulars not having had the time to examine the Rye Records personally as was intended.^ The very able and Reverend Author of that very valuable work was evidently unaware of the legal nature of the origin of the establishment of the church of England in West- chester County, and has given an eroneous view of it in that chapter, as will be seen by comparing it with that which will be found in the chapter on Manors in this work. A view based on the mistaken idea that it was the Act of 1693 which established the church 1 II. Bradford's Laws, 19. 2 Ante pp. 98 to 108 inclusive. 3 Town Records of Eye. * Town Records of Rye. ^ In 1704, Madame Kuight, in her Journal before referred to, says in speaking of the towns of Mamaroneck, Rye, and Horseueck (Greenwich) "that one church of England parson officiated in all these three towns once evei-y Sunday throughout the year." of England within New York, whereas it was estab- lished by the royal authority many years before, New York being a conquered Province. And being the only British American province so conquered from another nation by the English Crown, it was there- fore the only one in America in which that Crown, by the law of England, had the power and right to es- tablish the church of England. In 1725 Mamaroneck paid towards the tax to support the Rector of Rye under the act of 1693, £18. Later, in 1767, the amount then, was £19, 2, 6. These sums were the annual ones for those years. The amounts were an- nually fixed by board of Justices under the law. So strong was the connection of Mamaroneck with Rye as a part of that Parish, in fact and in feel- ing, that it continued practically down to the founding of St. Thomas' Church, Mamaroneck. All Mamar- oneck people of the Episcopal Church attended at Rye church, and were married and buried, and their children baptized, by the Rectors of Rye. A very few went to the New Rochelle church but the large ma- jority went to Rye. It was simply an example of the power of fkith and habit which descended to them from their ancestors. While a youth in Yale College the late Rt. Rev. William Heathcote de Lancey first began holding Episcopal services in Mamaroneck while on his visits to his home at Heathcote Hill. He entered college in 1813 and graduated in 1817, and these ser- vices began in 1814. He met with better success than he anticipated. His Father John Peter De Lancey took great interest in the matter, as did his friend and neighbor Mr. Peter J. Munro, and Mr. and Mrs. Peter Jay, the blind Mr. Jay, of Rye. Finally young Mr. de Lancey was so successful that on April 12th, 1814, under the auspices of his Father and Mr. Peter J. Munro a parish was organized under the old act of 17th March, 1795, to which was given the name of St. Thomas. Mr. John Peter de Lancey and Mr. Peter Jay Munro Church Wardens, and Capt. William Gray, Benjamin Hadden, Henry Ged- ney, Samuel Deal, Abraham Guion, and Matthias G. Valentine Vestrymen * at the first election held on Tuesday in Easter week of that year. The Rev. Mr. Haskell Rector of Rye and several of the clergy of the neighbouring parishes took charge of the services, which were held in the present Town Hall, then a Methodist Church just built, by the courtesy of that Society which had just previously been organized. They were continued with much though not perfect regularity. In 1813 the Legislature passed a new "Act relating to Religious Societies " which changed and made more favorable the method of organizing Episcopal Churches. The parish continued however under the original organization of 1814, till 1817, when by the advice of Mr. Munro, a new organization 'Certificate recorded iu Lib. A. of Religious Societies in West. Co. Reg'r. office p. 59. MAMARONKCK. 873 was effected under the later law, in order that some of its benefits might be availed of The first meeting with this object was held 5 April 1817 and the new incorporation was effected June 9th 1817. The Parish was admitted to union with the Convention on the 1st of October 1817, Dr. Guy Carleton Bayley being its first delegate. The next year 1818 Mr. William H. de Lancey then pur- suing his studies in Theology witli Bishop Hobart was the lay delegate. The Church Wardens were the same, John Peter de Lancey and Peter Jay Munro. The vestrymen under the new organization were Henry Gedncy, Benjamin Hadden, Jacob Mott, Thomas .J. de Lancey, Benjamin Crooker, Guy C. Bayley, Monmouth Lyon, Edward F. de Lancey. The Rev. Mr. Haskell, who was Mr. John P. de Lan- cey's Rector at Rye, and under his influence long afforded a nursing hand to the infant parish, often giving it services both on Sundays and week days. Mr. de Lancey kept up his connection with, and pew in Rye Church to the time of his death in 1828, and ST. THOMAS' CHURCH, (OLD). he also had a pew in the church at Xew Rochelle by way of aiding that parish then needing all the help it could get. No clergyman was regularly called at first. After Mr. William H. de Lancey was ordained Deacon in 1820 he served temporarily for a few months in Grace church, New York, and subsequently in Trinity church, N. Y. In the spring of 1821, when the latter temporary engagement ended he returned to his father's House at Mamaroneck, until Bishop Ho- bart could give him a permanent parish. W'hile at Mamaroneck he was called to St. Thomas's, accepted, and served gratuitously, till 1822 when through Bishop Hobart's recommendation he was invited by Bishop White of Pennsylvania, to become his personal assistant in the " three United churches " of Christ church, St. Peter's, and St James's in Philadelphia of which he was also Rector. This invitation Mr. de Lancey accepted, and in April 1822 took up his resi- dence in that city. He thus became from June 1821 79 to April 1822, about ten months, the first clergyman regularly in charge of St. Thomas's, Mamaroneck. In 1823 a frame church with pointed windows and a low tower was erected, and consecrated on the 17th of June in that year by the Rt. Rev. John Henry Ho- bart, then the Bishop of New York. The expense was mainly borne by Mr. John Peter de Lancey, Mr. Peter Jay Munro, and Mr. Purdy the father of the present Mr. Samuel G. Purdy, of Harrison. The clergy present were the Rev. Lewis P. Bayard and the Rev. Lawson Carter, both warm friends, and the former a relative of Mr. de Lancey and the wife of Mr. Munro. A cut of it is given which shows the edifice as it was originally. It was enlarged some years later, in 1835 by a chancel, and again in 1857 — atthe chan- cel end by an addition containing another window on each side, and so remained until removed, and subse- quently torn down, on the erection of the present striking and exceedingly handsome stone church, built at their sole expense and presented to the church corporation, by Mr. James M. Constable and his children as a memorial of his wife and their mother the late Mrs. Henrietta Constable, who de- parted this life February 11'", 1884. The Corner- stone was laid December 4th, 1884, by the Rt. Rev, Henry C. Potter, Assistant Bishop of New York, and the church was consecrated by the same Prelate June 10th, 1886, the Rev. Dr. Swope of Trinity Par- ish, New York, preaching the sermon. The new church, of which an engraving is given from a draw- ing expressly made for the purpose by Mr. Bassett Jones its masterly Architect, is a beautiful building, chaste, simple, dignified, and very effective. It is a perfect specimen of an old English Parish Church. The style is the Early English Gothic, with the mas- siveness often found in the churches of that period. It is built of Belleville brown stone, rusticated, and consists of chancel, nave, tower, and two porches. The entire length is 127 feet, that of the nave alone 70 feet, the chancel, a square one, is 25 deep by 19 feet wide, and the height of the tower is 87 feet. It has a high open timbered roof in the rich yellow pine of the Southern states. The altar and reredos are of Caen stone richly sculptured, the latter showing an exquisitely executed bas-relief of the Last Sup- per of Leonardo da Vinci. The pulpit is also of Caen stone carved, surmounted by a wide polished brass panelled rail of antique design. The windows are of English stained glass all showing figure subjects finely executed. The font, after a special and beau- tiful design of the architect, is of the deeply rich tinted Derbyshire Spar, recently discovered in larger masses than ever before known, not far from the City of Chesterfield in Derbyshire in England, all highly polished inside and outside. The pews in num- ber 80 afford 350 sittings and are of oak. The Tower contains a very musical sweet toned chime of 10 bells, and a clock which strikes the quarters and half hours, as well as the hours. 874 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. In the same enclosure with the church, and a short distance from it stand the Rectory and parish build- ings in the same style of architecture but built of brick with brown stone casings, and slate roofs. They are happily of irregular shape and combined so under a series of varying angles and roofs, that they present to the eye but a single very picturesque edifice. The whole together, though the general eflect is im- paired by being in the business and not very attrac- tive part of the village, an evil that has been partially remedied by the liberal purchase and removal of ad- joining buildings, and throwing their area into fair gardens, form one of the most thorough, complete, beautiful and churchly group of Parish edifices, with appropriate surroundings in this county, and are a noble monument to the Wife and Mother in whose memory they have been erected. ST. THOMAS' CHURCH, (NEW). At Larchmont a handsome frame chapel was erect- ed four years ago by the Trustees of the Larchmont Land Company for general services. Afterward it was organized as a chapel of ease of St. Thomas's Church Mamaroneck under the ministration and direction as to its services of the Rector of that church for the time being. It and the Sunday school attached to it is only open during the summer season. Usually an arrangement is made with the assent of the Rector of St. .Thomas with some clergyman temporarily for the services at the chapel during the season. The Trustees in 1886 are Marcus P. Wood- ruff and David Jardine. A Methodist Society was organized and a frame church built in Mamaroneck, on High Street in 1813. It there continued with a small congregation till about the year 1850, when it was removed to Rye Neck and a large and handsome frame church edifice was there erected about a third of a mile from the Mamaroneck River Bridge and nearly at the junction of the old Westchester Path with the road running east from that Bridge, an account of which falls ap- propriately in the chapter on Rye. The late Mr. James M. Fuller organized a Methodist Sunday- school and erected a building for its use in 1878 on Weaver street mainly at his own expense, which he superintended himself until his lamented death in June 1885, when Mr. William H. Stiles succeeded him assisted by Mr. Bradford Rhodes. The object is to afford Sunday-school instruction to children in the neighbourhood, which is distant from the villages of Mamaroneck and Rye Neck. All the gentlemen connected with it are Methodists but it is under- stood that it is not conducted under the auspices of any denomination in particular. The Incidents of the Revolution which occurred in Mamaroneck are not many. Its inhabitants as well as the great majority of the People of the County were a perfectly satisfied, quiet, community, satisfied with their surrounding, and their lot. They had a market within a day's journey or a day's sail for all that they could raise beyond their own wants. Their taxes were light and they managed their local concerns for them- selves under the easy laws of the Province. They felt no pressure of any kind or from any quarter. Even in the politics of the day there was no high party feeling, still less any undue excitements. They were a happy, contented people perfectly satisfied to be let alone. When the movements of politicians of New York and other places against the English Ministry began, which resulted, contrary to the wishes of those who first started these movements, in the Declaration of Independence, the people of Westchester as a mass were not in favor of them. Neither were some of those who gave a final assent to them. Hence it was that not- withstanding that Westchester eventually became the Neutral Ground, the people who dwelt in it were more in favor of the old state of things than in the proposed new one. It was natural. It is so in all countries under all systems. Those who excite revolutionary movements to overthrow old governments, are always a minority, and usually a very great minority, of the inhabitants of the Country the institutions of which are changed by violence or war. Hence it was that in 1774 the people of Mamaroneck opposed the action of the Committee of Correspondence, set forth in their circular of 29 July 1774 as also did those of Rye.' When it was known that Gage's Army in Boston was getting short of provisions late in 1775, a sort of killing bee was held at William Sutton's house at de Lancey's Neck, the neighboring farmers drove cattle there and a certain day killed and dressed, and after- ward salted down and barrelled as soon as it could be done, beeves enough to load a sloop as a contribution to the besieged troops at Boston. She was loaded at Indian point, near the present home of Mr. James J. Burnet, and sent oft' on her voyage. Butshe never got 1 See Proceedings of Mamaroneck, Ac, in I. Force's Archives. MAMARONECK. 875 to Boston. Through some carelessness in running out with a smart breeze, she ran a little too near the enii of a reef in rounding the Scotch Caps, struck a pointed rock, and sank beyond it with all on board. The crew was saved but the beef in the hold was all lost. It is not related that any second attempt was ever made. The most important Revolutionary incident, was the night battle on Heathcote Hill and the high ridge above it, between the Delaware Regiment, and parts of First and Third Virginia Regiments of Wash- ington's army, under Colonel Haslet and Major Green, and Roberts's Rangers of Howe's Army under Major Rogers, resulting in the repulse of the former with severe loss to the latter who retained their posi- tion. On October 21st, 1776, Rogers's Corps of about 400 or 450 men which formed the extreme end of the right wing of Howe's Army, then moving up from Pelham Neck, reached Mamaroneck and encamped upon the high flat of Heathcote Hill, under the lee of the ridge above it for protection from the North- west winds, which at that season had grown cold. No enemy was beyond them and this position was therefore chosen. Rogers himself made his head- quarters in a small house which then stood directly on the north side of the old Westchester Path or road, right opposite the gate of the lane which ran down de I^ancey's Neck to Sutton's House, which stood within the present Miller premises now owned by Mr. J. A. Bostwick. On the 22d of October Wash- ington rode up to White Plains in advance of his army, who had then reached Valentine's Hill. Learn- ing there of Rogers's advance and position, he at once sent orders to Colonel Haslet to take his Delaware regiment of 600 strong, and 150 men of the First and Third Virginia under Major Green, and surprise and cut him off.' The Virginians were to lead the attack and the Delaware troops to support them. Rogers bad been a scout of Sir William Johnson's with Israel Putnam, in the French War, was a man of fair edu- cation, not much principle, but extremely bold, cour- ageous, and wary. Knowing the American Army was below his position and to the southwest of it, he ex- tended his pickets more than a third of a mile the second night beyond where they were on the first night and doubled their numbers, and then went to his own headquarters. Haslett marched all night and reached the neighborhood before day. His guides not aware of the change in Rogers's pickets led the Virginians directly upon them in the dark, which threw them into confusion. At once all hopes of a surprise van- ished. The uproar roused Rogers's camp, the men rushed to the top of the ridge overlooking it and be- fore they could form, their own pickets and the Vir- ginians mixed together came rushing in upon them. It was pitch dark, and the fighting went on in the utmost confusion, the Dclawareans, Virginians and ' III. Force, Fifth Series, 576. Rangers being all mixed together each man fighting for himself Right in the midst of it rushed Rogers. Roused by the noise, he flew up to the fight not know- ing how it was going, but roaring out with presence of mind, in stentorian tones, "They are running," " they are running," " give it to 'em boys, damn 'em, give it to 'em." Reassured by his voice and words the Rangers, actually on the point of fleeing, rallied, redoubled their ettbrts, and the American forces fell back taking many prisoners with them, and the Rangers remained in possession of the ground. The surprise was a failure, the action really a drawn one though the Rangers retained the field, Rogers's wari- ness and presence of mind being all that saved them from defeat and capture. Such is the account that has come down from men living in Mamaroneck at the time. Col. Tench Tilghman, Washington's aid, writing the afternoon after the fight to Wm. Duer says " They attacked Rogers at daybreak, put the party to flight, brought in thirty-six prisoners, sixty arms, and a good many blankets; and had not the guides undertook to alter the first disposition, Major Rogers, and his party of about 400, would in all prob- ability have fallen into our hands. We don't know how many we killed, but an officer says he counted twenty-five in one orchard. We had twelve wounded, among them Major Green and Captain Pope."' The fact is the number killed on each side is not certainly known. All of both sides were buried just over the top of the ridge almost directly north of the Heath- cote Hill house, in the angle formed by the present farm lane and the east fence of the field next to the ridge. There their graves lie together friend and foe but all Americans.^ The late Stephen Hall, (father of the late Abram, Isaac, and Thomas, Hall) a boy of 17 or 18 at the time, said that they were buried the morn- ing after the fight and that he saw nine laid in one large grave.* Such was the skirmish on Heathcote Hill, the only " engagement " about Mamaroneck during the Revolutionary War. There was another on the back part of the Manor of Scarsdale at the Fox Mead- ows, immediately before the battle of White plains, but that does not fairly belong to this chapter. The writer, knowing that Mamaroneck did her full duty in the late civil war, tried some years ago to get at Albany the returns of enlistments and names of the men, but failed, the supervisor never having tiled them. The following is an account of the descendants of .John Richbell, who left only daughters, and of the Mott family of whom one of them was the ancestress. The writer is indebted for it to Mrs. Thomas C. Cor- nell, of Yonkers : John Richbell, the first patentee of Mamaroneck = TII. Force, Fifth Series 57, 6. My father told me when he was a boy their green graves were dis- tinctly visible. .\braham Hall told the writer this fact many years ago. 876 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. leaving no sons, his name has not been perpetuated in his children, but some of the descendants of his daughter have been well known in Mamaroneck, and in Westchester County, and in the State and Nation, and should be mentioned here. John and Ann Rich- bell left three daughters. 1^'. Elizabeth, the eldest who became the second wife of Adam Mott of Hemp- stead, about the time that her father removed from Oysterbay, — where he had been Adam Mott's neigh- bour, — to make his final settlement at Mamaroneck. — 2*. Mary, who in 1670 married Captain James Mott, second son of Adam Mott of Hempstead by his first wife Jane Hulett. Captain James Mott was long prominent in Mamaroneck, was Justice of the Peace and Supervisor, and left two children James and Mary. — S**. The youngest daughter of John Richbell, named Anne after her mother, married John Emerson of White River, Talbot County, Maryland. Elizabeth (Richbell) Mott, gave to her eldest son her father's name and called him Richbell Mott and his grandmother Ann Richbell made him one of her executors and three of the grandsons of this Richbell Mott bore the same name. Richbell Mott was a man of Character and Substance, and in 1696 married Elizabeth Thorne. He possessed considerable land in Hempstead and made his home on Mad Nan's Neck (Little Neck). His grandson Richbell Mott son of his eldest son Edmond, — born in Hempstead in 1728 mar- ried in 1749 Deborah Doughty, and died in 1758 leav- ing two daughters Margaret and Phebe. This Mar- garet Mott married in 1772 the Hon. Melancthon Smith of New York one of the most prominent men of the State during and alter the Revolution in the policy opposed to that of Alexander Hamilton. Rich- bell Mott Smith, one of the sons of Hon. Melancthon and Margaret (Mott) Smith died on the coiist of Ja- pan in 1800. Another son was Colonel Melancthon Smith, the father of Admiral Melancthon Smith U. S. N. on the retired list who distinguished himself so highly during the late Civil war especially at the capture of New Orleans, and who is now living in an honored old age, at South Oysterbay L. I. Dr. Valentine Mott, the celebrated Surgeon of New York was descended from Elizabeth (Richbell) Mott's younger son William Mott of Great Neck, — L. I. James Mott of Premium Point, long a well known resident of the Mamaroneck of a hundred years ago, was the only child of the first Richbell Mott's young- est son Richard, and Sarah (Pearsall) Mott, and was born in Hempstead at " the Head of the Harbor " — now Roslyn in 1742. He married in 1765 his second cousin Mary Underbill, daughter of Samuel and Ann (Carpenter) Underbill of Oysterbay. Samuel Under- bill a cousin of the Underbills of Westchester Coun- ty, was a great grandson of the celebrated Capt. John Underbill who died in Oysterbay in 1671, and Ann Carpenter's mother Mary Willet, wife of Joseph Car- penter of Glencove was a grand daughter on her fath- er's side of Capt. Thomas Willet the first English Mayor of New York, and on her mother's side of Wm. Coddington the first Governor of Rhode Island. The Underbills and the Coddingtons and the Willets and the Motts had become Quakers. James Mott, after a few years as a successful merchant in New York re- tired just before the Revolution, with a moderate com- petence, at the early age of thirty-three and settled in Mamaroneck, on the " West Neck " of his Grandfath- er's grandfather, John Richbell, on the peninsula nearly in front of the Village of New Rochelle. His wife was then in failing health and he sought a quiet home, remote from the threatenings of war which per- vaded the City. But the war soon came, and in place of quiet, he found himself with wife and children be- tween the lines of hostile armies and exposed to dep- redations from outlaws on both sides. His wife died early in the Revolution. The ancient handsome two storj' farm house, occu- pied by James Mott, with its double-pitched roof, still stands in good repair, fronting to the South, on its own private lane, half a mile east of the Boston road, surrounded by trees and with its own farm buildings and cultivated fields, and in recent years has been occupied by the Pryor family. But the an- cient tide Mill which stood near the house on the land locked bay which made the Mill Pond, and which James Mott continued to operate after the Revolu- tion, was replaced about the end of the last century by a large new Mill, and a new dam about half a mile lower down the bay near its mouth. — James Mott's three sons Richard Robert and Samuel had grown to manhood, and they fitted up the new Mill with twelve runs of Mill Stones, and all the improve- ments then known and gave it the name of the Pre- mium Mill, and it was operated with much success and exported flour to Europe while England and France were at war, with large profit. Soon after the Premium Mill was built Richard Mott, the eldest son withdrew from the milling business, and commenced cotton spinning in a small Mill still standing disman- tled, near his pleasant dwelling house, to which he gave the name of Hickory Grove, a little west of where the N. Y. and N. H. Rail Road now runs near Mamaroneck, — and " Mott's Spool Cotton," had a good reputation for many years. Richard Mott became a Quaker Minister of considerable reputation. He was a man of fine presence and a graceful and pleasing speaker. He died in Mamaroneck in 1857, in his 90th year. James and Mary (Underbill) Mott had four chil- dren, born in New York but brought up in Mamaro- neck. Their eldest son Richard just mentioned was born in 1767. Their only daughter Anne born 1768 married at Mamaroneck in 1785, while still wanting three months of her seventeenth birthday, her father's cousin Adam Mott of Hempstead, in whose veins ran the blood of the best Quaker families of that first set- tlement of the Quakers in America. The young Adam Mott, the third in descent of the first Adam Mott MAMARONECK. 877 of Hempstead, and the fourth from John Richbell, — brought his young bride to the old Mott homestead, on the shore of the Sound near Hempstead Harbor, on land which had been granted to his great Uncle Richbell Mott in 1708 and which Richbell Mott sold to his brother Adam Mott in 1715. The young Adam between 1785 and 1790 built a new Mill at Cow bay — (now Port Washington,) and prospered therefor more than fifteen years, and when his wife's brother Richard retired from the Premium Mill, the remaining brothers Robert and Samuel induced their brother-in-law Adam Mott of Hempstead to leave his prosperous Mill at Cow bay and join them in the Premium Mill, and he removed to Mamaroneckin 1803 and settled in a house afterwards the property of Peter Jay Monroe, and called the " Mott House," on a pleasant farm adjoin- ing what is now known as Larchmont. The oldest son of Adam and Anne Mott, born in the ancient Mott homestead near the mouth of Hempstead Harbour in 1788 and named after his grandfather James Mott, went to Philadelphia and there married in 1811 Lu- cretia Coffin, who afterwards as Lucretia Mott of Phil- adelphia became eminent as a Quaker preacher and eloquent advocate of many reforms. In 1814 James and Lucretia Mott spent some months at Mamaro- neck on the invitation of their Uncle Richard Jlott to join him in Cotton Spinning, and if the project had been carried out as first proposed, the eloquent Qua- ker Preacher would have been known as Lucretia Mott of Mamaroneck, instead of Lucretia Mott of Philadel- phia. But she was then only 21 years old, and did not so much as imagine that she could speak in public, and the spinning project not coming to satis- factory terms they returned to Philadel{)hia. Adam and Anne Mott's youngest son Richard, born at Premium Point in 1804, now for many years the Hon. Richard Mott of Toledo Ohio still survives in a vigorous old age of 82, one of the best known men in Northern Ohio. When the laws of the first Napoleon dragged the United States into controversies with France and England which culminated in the war of 1812, Amer- ican Commerce was crippled or ruined and the Pre- mium Mill at length went under a cloud. One .entire Ship's cargo from the ^^ill was confiscated in France on a charge of violating a paper blockade, and no restitution ever made. James Mott made Premium Point his home until 1816 and died in New York in 1823 in his eighty-first year. He was a man of culture and high character, unusually handsome in person, tall, erect, and of much grace and dignity of manner and stood high in general esteem. In dress and habits he was always a strict Quaker of the old days, and active in the interests of his religious society travelling much in their serA'ice in the States of New York, Pennsylvania and New England. He gave freely for many years, in time and means, and in the use of his pen in the advancement of Education, and the suppression of intemperanci, and would allow nothing produced by Slave labor to be used in his house, and a.s far as possible limited his household to American Manufactures. Robert Mott, the second son of James Mott of Premium Point died in New York in 1805 and his youngest son Samuel died there in 1843. The Premium Mill continued to be operated with varying success for many years and after James Mott and his sons, passed through other hands and in 1843 was j)urchased by Henry Partridge Kellogg then of Poughkeepsie in whose family it remained for nearly forty years. The Mill itself venerable with age was finally removed within the last three or four years, and near its site now stand several handsome modern Cottages or Villas. The Three Great Patents of Central Westchester. Very closely connected with Mamaroneck and Scarsdale as parts of the Manor of Scarsdale, was that part of the County lying between that JIanor and Harrison's Purchase on the south, the Manor of Cort- landt on the north, the Colony of Connecticut on the east, and the Manor of Philipseburgh on the west. This immense area containing 70,000 acres of land, was bought from the natives by Colonel Heathcote for himself and associates and granted to him and them in three extremely large Patents, called from their relative situations the West, the Middle, and the East Patents. In the purchase of the Indian title to these lands, and in the Patents for them express provision was made that the rights of Heathcote under the Rich- bell patents and deeds, should not be interfered with. Hence their long connexion with his lands now com- prised in the towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck. These " Great Patents," as they were styled were bounded in part by Scarsdale Manor and are ao intimately connected with its history, that some mention must be briefly made of them and their origin. By its terms the Manor-Grant of Scars- dale embraced White Plains, a part of Northcas- tle, part of Bedford, and part of Harrisons Pur- chase, but it expressly provided as to White Plains that it should give its I^ord no other title than that he already possessed by virtue of his purchase of the right title and estate of Mrs. Ann Richbell in the Estate of her husband John Richbell the original grantee from the Indians and from both the Dutch Government and the English Government. These Great Patents were not Manore, though two of them were larger than either of the Manors of Pel- ham, ilorrisania or Fordham. They were simply Patents for great tracts of land issued according to law to three bodies of grantees as individuals, who each possessed an undivided share, bodies which in modern parlance would be called " syndicates.'' They were based uj^on a license to Colonel Heathcote to purchase vacant and unappropriated land in West- chester county and extinguish the title of the Natives 878 HISTORY OP WESTCHESTER COUNTY. granted by Governor Fletcher on the 12th of October, 1696. He was the most prominent of the gentlemen who formed the bodies above mentioned and who be- came the Owners and Patentees of these three Pat- ents. The first purchase made by Colonel Heathcote in the region mentioned, was from Pathunck, Wam- pus, Cohawney, and five other Indians, who on the 19th of October, 1696, executed to him a deed con- veying " for and in consideration £100 good and law- ful money of New York," " all that tract of land situ- ate lying and being in the County of Westchester in the Province of New York in America, bounded north by Scroton's ' River, easterly by Byram River and Bedford line, southerly by the land of John Harrison and his associates, and the line stretching to Byram river aforesaid, and westerly to the land of Frederick Philipse." > This covered all the present town of New castle and most of North castle as it now exists, and other lands south and east of the latter. It is hence some- times called " North castle Indian Deed," or from one of the Indians " Wampus's Land Deed." Colonel Heathcote made most of the purchases of the Indians of Northern and Central Westchester then inhabiting it, in accordance with the customary rule in such mat- ters which has been before explained. That for the lands between the Mehanas' and Byram Rivers, he delegat- ed his powers to others to obtain, by this license dated at Mamaroneck the 4th of July 1701, " I underwritten do give free liberty, so far as it lyes in my power (by virtue of a grant to me from Colonel Ben jamin Fletcher, late Governor of New York) unto Robert Lockhard, Richard Scofield, Nathaniel Selleck, and Gershom Lockwood, to purchase of the Indian proprietors the lands heteafter mentioned from Mehanas river to Byram River, and so run northward three miles into ye woods upon Byram River, and one mile into ye Woods on the Mehanas River, provided it does not injure the right of Bedford or Greenwich, nor is within my pat- ent right from Mrs. Ann Richbell. Witness my hand. Caleb Heathcote. Mamaroneck, July 4th, 1701. The same day the following Indians " in considera- tion of a certaine sume of good & lawful money " ex- ecuted a deed for the land to the above named four persons and Coll. Heathcote, Capt. James Mott, Jon- athan Lockhard, Gershom Lockhard's son, and Henry Disbrow, the same persons mentioned in Heathcote's license, thus describing it, " to begin at Byram river at y'' Collony Line & so to run to Mehanas river as said line goes running northerly on Mehanas river as y" river goes a mile into y* woods, & from the Collony Line on Byram river three miles northerly as the river 1 New CrotoD Eiver. 2 Lib. I. 52, of Deeds, Sec. of State's off', .ilbaiiy. 'Now spelled " ilianus." runs into the Woods, & from the head of said line to y^ head of the other line afore mentioned.* The witnesses were Seringo -|- Benjamin Disbrow Raresquash -|- Benjamin Collier, with Washpakin -)- Uraticus and Ranchomo -f- six other Indians Packanaim -\- On the same fourth of July, 1701, when there seems to have been a meeting of all the parties in interest, Indians and whites, at Mamaroneck, to consummate several Indian purchases, Seringo, and three other In- dians executed the following deed to Joseph Horton for a very large tract indeed. It is printed verbatim from the original in John Horton's hand writing in the writer's possession : "The: 4: of July— 1701 " Biet* known to all home it may consarn That I Sa- ringo hafe This day Sold unto Joseph Horton saner (senior) A sarten Track or parsal of Land Setuaten and Lyen within the profence (province) of Nu Yorcke which land beginen at the purch[ase] lastly purch"* by Cornal Hacoc' " John Horton Cap" Thall Joseph" Purdy and all the Land from biram reuer * wassward unpurch'* and so to run upward to brunkess reuer,' and I Saringo do oblidge myself my ars'" orassins to marcket" outebyMark Treeseasmay aper her agan'^ and This To be marcked oute The Sext: or Saventli Day of This entant'' munth and for the Tru Burformance I haf Sat my hand and Sale Sineded Saled and Dleaved In prants of us This been in order To a furder confmashon. Saringo -f and three other Indians (names illegible). John Horton (illegible) Hatfield Hannah park his John -f- Cake mark his Robard + Smeth mark Endorsed upon the deed is this statement of the' consideration by Horton, I Joseph Horton oblige mysalf To pay one Sarengo * Ancient copy of the original deed with Heathcote's license appended, in the writer's possession. .\lso recorded in West. Co. Records Lib. C, 96. s Be it. ' Colonel Heathcote. 'Capt. Theall. 'Byram River westward unpurchased. ' Bronx River. "Heirs. 11 Mark it. 12 Appear here again. Instant. MAMARONECK. 879 he performen his part accorded to bagen ' as may apen connsarnend Land which he Is or (illegible) to performe The a buv named horton Is obliged To Pay Sringo and the ras^ of his (illegible) as folas' 1 barel of Sidar 6 Shurts 5 galans of rum 1 Cot 1 shepe And this to be payd at or before The furst day of Jnery ^ nex in (three small words illegible) The day manshshened ^ July : 4 : 17001 * 1 hors : 1 Sadal : 1 bridal 2 cots 1 caf 2 shurds ' 1 ancher of rum " * This deed included all the land that had not before been purchased, from Byram River northwestward to the Bronx River. In the month of June preceding, on the eleventh, twenty-three days prior to the execu- tion of the above deed, Seringo and two other Indians "in consideratione of a certain sum of money" deeded to Colonel Heathcote, Capt. Joseph Theal, Lieut. John Horton,' and Mr Joseph Purdy of Mamaroneck a tract " bounded as followeth, — Southerly by Byram River, Northerly to the Northwest corner of a great swamp commonly called the Round Swamp, thence a southwesterly line to Rye, great Pond, and bounded by the said pond westerly, and so runs to Harrisons great marked tree." On the 5th of July 1701, the same Seringo and the other Indians deeded to Heathcote, Theal, Joseph Horton, and Purdy a tract bounded "southerly by the Colony Line, easterly by ^lehanas River, north- erly by Bedford line and marked trees to Mehanas River, and southerly as said river goes against the stream to the head thereof." On the 27th of March 1702 a deed for lands north of Cross River above Bedford village was executed to Colonel Heathcote by Katonah the Sagamore of all that region, which as it is not recorded is here given from the original in the hand writing of the > According to bargain. 2 Rest. ' Follows. * January. ' Mentioned. •So in the original. ' Shirts. 8 This extraordinary deed is written on the reverse aide of a private letter to Joseph Horton from one Samuel Ufford, dated " Stratford the 14th day of 3Iay," but no year ; it is not recorded. 'The draughtsman of the last Indian deed. "> Rec. in " Albany Records," i. p. 94. noted Zachariah Roberts " of Bedford, in the writer's possession : Katonah' s Deed to Col. Caleb Heathcote. " This Bill of Seall bearing date in the year one thousand seven hundred and two : tcstifyeth that we Katonah, Wackamane and Wewanapeag proprietors of the sd land afternamed lying above Bedford and bounded Southward by Cross Riuer, eastward by Marked trees, westward by Cortlandt's land & North- wards petticus Small Riuer, which sd track of land is estimasion is five miles long and three miles wide : this above sd. upland & medow land we Katonah Wackamane and Wewanapeag, we for ourselves and from our ayrs and all other Indians whatsumeuer do sell, alienate, asigne, & set over this abousd land lying in the County of Westchester & in ye provence of New Yorck unto Cornall Caleb Hethcut of Mama- ranuck and Captain petter'^ Mathews of new Yorck, Joseph purdy of Ry and Richard Scoflfeld of Stan- ford, or any other conserned in the aboue said pur- ches. We the aboue sd indiens trew proprietars of ye aboue sd land as the bounds are named we have sold & doe set over from us our ayrs executors administra- tors, or asignes for euer unto the aboue named Caleb Hethcut, petter Mathews, Joseph Purdy, Richard Scoffeld to them their ayrs executors administrators and asignes for euer with all the rights titles privileges & apurtenances thereunto belonging promising to them & theyrs that they shall enioye the same pees- ably without let or molestation from us or ours or any other Indians laying any claime thereunto for euer, and we doe acknowledg that we have reciued full satisfacktion for the aboue said track of land as witness our hands and sealls this 27 day of March 1702. Signed Sealled and delivered in Bedford iu the pres ance of us Zechariah Roberts John Dibell John ^liller Chickheag + Caconico -|- Arottom -f- Mangockem + Acount of good Katonah -\- Wackamane + Wewanapeag 4- to one 6 guns to anker of rum to 20 bars of lead to 12 drain '* knifs to 12 par sockins to 12 citels " to G iron citels to cotun cloth 11 Roberts was the loading man of Bedford, noted for his bitter hostility to the Church of England, and bis intense desire to profit by all the public employments he could obtain. 12 Peter. •^Sickles. 1^ Drawing-knirei. 880 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. to 20 knifs to 12 hos 2 to 12 swords to 12 axis " to dufils-^ to blankits to 10 barils of sider' One of the persons prominently engaged with Col- onel Heathcote in obtaining the several Indian deeds above set forth for the lands between Harrison and the Crotou River was Joseph Horton of Rye the grantee in the above deed of the 4th of July 1701 for all the unpurchased land between Byram river and the Bronx. The following instrument shows the nature of the agreement between them and incident- ally Heathcote's precise view of his own bounds and what belonged to him under his Richbell convey- ances in the territory covered by the foregoing Indian deeds and the three great patents subsequently based upon them. Agreement of Joseph Horton xvith Colonel Heathcote. Whereas by virtue of a License from Coll. Benj" ffletcher late Governor of this Province unto Coll. Caleb Heathcote impowering him to buy any lands from the Indian Proprietors betwixt Scroton's River * and the north end of Harrisson's Pattent, the said Heathcote and Joseph Horton have [bought] & are about to buy of the Indian Proprietors considerable tracts & parcells of Land ; Now know all men by these presents that It is mutually agreed & concluded betwixt the said Caleb Heathcote & Joseph Horton that such parts of any tract or parcells of land bought by them of the indian Proprietors as falls within said Heathcote's lines by virtue of his deeds from Mrs. Ann Richbell late deceased, the bounds whereof run with Mamaronock River to the head thereof thence in a north line twenty miles into the woods from Westchester Path, now all such lands as fall within the lines of those deeds as before mentioned shall be and remain to the said Caleb Heathcote his Heirs & assigns forever notwithstanding any deed or bill of sale in Partnership betwixt said Heathcote & Horton to them from the Indians, the said Heathcote paying and bearing the full charge of the purchase of all such land as falls within his lines afforesaid, & the said Heathcote not claiming a greater breadth through said purchase that is, or shall hereafter be made by him & said Horton, than he has at Westchester Path, which is from Mamoronock River to Pipin's brook adjoyneing the great Neck. In witness whereof the said Joseph Horton hath here unto sett his hand & seal this ffourteenth of July in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred & one. Signed Sealed & Delivered in presence of Benjamin Collier 1 A coarse and thick, but soft woolen cloth made in Holland. 2 Hoes. 3 This was a very good price for that day. * Now Croton River. Anne Millington Joseph Horton (L. S.)' Out of the lands the Indian title to which was ex- tinguished by the various Indian deeds above set forth were formed the three Great Patents that have been mentioned, the West Patent dated 14"' February 1701 to ten Patentees, the Middle Patent dated 17* February 1701 to 13 Patentees, and the East Patent dated 2'i March 1701 to 11 Patentees. Ten of these Patentees were the same in all thi-ee Patents. They were the ten persons to whom the West Patent, the earliest of the three, was issued, and their names were Robert Walters, Leigh Attwood, Cornelius De Peyster, Caleb Heathcote, Matthew Clarkson, John Chollwell, Richard Slater, Robert Lurting, Barne Cosens, Lancaster Symes, all well known as promi- nent men of the City and Province of New York. In the Middle Patent in addition to the above ten, Joseph Theale, John Horton, and Joseph Purdy, all of Rye, appear as Patentees. In the East Patent besides the above ten Peter Mathews of Bedford ap- pears as a Patentee. Several of these Patentees held their shares not for themselves but in trust for friends and some of them sold their shares to other persons. Immediately after the Patents were issued, all the different Patentees named in each executed joint cove- nants under seal, that no survivorship should take place aniong them, and that each should be divided into as many distinct parts as there were Patentees. The covenant for the West Patent was dated February 18"' 1702, those for the Middle and East Patents were both dated the same day, the 25'" of June 1702.^ The following statement showing in the three Patents, the changes of the Patentees names, the Quit-rents payable for each, the number of acres of improvable land in each, and their respective boun- daries, is from the original in the writer's possession. It is undated, but was evidently made out in Colonel Heathcote's lifetime, and probably about 1715 or 1716. The West Patent. " Patent : 14 Feb : 1701 5000 Acres Improvable Land £6, 5, 0, Quit-Rent 10 Shares. Patentees Names In trust for or sold to, R. Walter Schellenx & Lyon L. At wood Clarksons C. Depeyster C. Heathcote M. Clarkson Jno. Chollwell Quinby R. Slater T. Weaver R. Lurting C. Heathcote Barne Cosens Peter Fanconnier ' Original deed in Colo. Heathcote's handwriting in possession of the writer. It is not recorded. 8 From ancient copies of these covenants in the writer's possession. MAMARONECK. 881 Bounded Northerly, By Croton River and the Mannor of Cortlandt, or one of them. Easterly, With Bedford Line of Three Miles Square, the White Fields, and Byram Point. Southerly, By the land of John Harrison &c, Rye Line stretch- ing to Biram River and the White Plains, Westerly, By Brunk's River and the Mannor of Philipsburgh, Excepting out of y* Bounds aforesaid all y*' Lands within Richbell's Patent, now in y''Tenour& occupa- tion of Coll. Caleb Heathcote. The Middle Patent. " Patent : 17 February, 1701 1500 Acres Improvable Laud £1, 17, 6 Quit Rent 13 Shares Patentees Names In Trust for or Sold to C. Heathcote Jo. Thcale J. Horton J. Purdy R. Walter Schellinx & Lyon Leigh Atwood Clarksons M. Clarkson Lan. Symes C. De Peyster Heirs Coll. Depeyster R. Slater Tho. Weaver John Chollwell Quinby Barne Cosens P. Fanconnier Robert Lurting C. Heathcote Bounded Southerly, by the Division Line betweene y" Colony of Connecti- cut and the Province of New York parallell to the Sound. Easterly, By Mahanas River. Northerly, by Bedford Line and Mark' Trees runing westerly to Mahanas River. Westerly, again and as the said River goes against the stream to the head thereof, then along the Easterly branch of Biram River to the said Colony Line again where the same began. The East Patent "Patent: 2 March 1701 6200 Acres Improvable Laud £7, 1(5, 0, Quit-Rent 11 Shares. In Trust for or sold to Schellinx & Lyon Quinby Clarksons T. Weaver P. Fanconnier C. Heathcote Patentees Names Ro. Walter Juo. Chollwell L. Atwood C. De Peyster R. Slater Barne Cosens M. Clarkson Lan. Symes Rob. Lurting Peter Mathews Caleb Heathcote Bounded South by the Division Line between N. Y. and said Colony of Connecticut, and so along said Line until it meets with the Patent of Adolph Philipse, and so along his south- ern bounds till it meets witii the Mannor of Cortlandt and from thence by a Line that shall run upon a direct course until it meets with the first easterly Line of 20 of the said Mannor of Cortlandt, and from thence along the said line Westerly till it meets with the Pat- ent granted to R. Walter & others, thence southerly along the said Patent untill it meets with the bounds of the Township of Bedford & thence round along said bounds untill it meets with the patent granted to Coll. Heathcote and others, and along the bounds of said Patent unto the Colony Line where it firsst began. — Also a small Tract of Land beginning westerly at a great Rock on the Westmost side at the Southmost end of a Ridge Known by the Name of Richbell or Horse Ridge and from thence Northwest and by North to Brunk's River, Easterly beginning at a mark'd Tree at the Eastmost side on the Southmost end of the said Ridge and thence north to Brunk's River." This West Patent by its bounds excluded White- plains, which Colonel Heathcote claimed under his Richbell deeds and Patents. This led to a contro- versy between him and some "Rye Men" who claimed Whiteplains as a part of their town. This claim however remained passive, and nothing but a claim during Colonel Heathcote's life as the result of the Richbell verdict against Rye in 1696 (set forth above in full) the year before Colonel Heathcote bought the Richbell estate of Ann Richbell. The laud was then worth very little, and the Rye claim- ants were very few. Colonel Heathcote died Febru- ary 28, 1720-21, and his entire estate passed under his will to his two daughters, Ann, the elder, subse- quently the wife of James de Lancey chief justice of the Province of New York who died its Governor in 1760, and Martha, the younger, subsequently the wife of Lewis Johnston, M.D., of Perth Amboy, New J»rsey, who died in 1774. His widow, Mrs. Martha Heathcote, was the sole executrix. By her and the tw^o gentlemen just named, in the course of time, settlements were effected of Colonel Heathcote's in- terests in Whiteplains, the three patents above men- tioned and in Harrisson's purchase. 882 HISTOEY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. In relation to White plains it has been stated er- roneously that Colonel Heathcote died, " about four years later" than 1702, in which year a committee of Rye people were appointed to agree with him on a line between his Patent and White plains, and that the question remained " still unsettled." ^ This is an entire mistake, Colonel Heathcote lived nearly twenty years instead of four, after 1702, and maintained his right to White plains, but was always ready to agree with the Rye jieople about the matter, but they, though occasionally talking about it, practically re- mained passive, in consequence of the Richbell ver- dict against them of December 3, 1696, above set forth. Not till after Colonel Heathcote's death, which occurred on February 28, 1720-21, was the matter closed, though negotiations were pending in his life- time, and Governor Burnet's Patent for White plains was issued to Joseph Budd, Humphrey Underbill and others, bearing date the 13th of March 1721. The Patentees named therein, with four or five exceptions, were entirely different men from the " proprietors of the White plaines purchase " ^ whose names appear in a list taken from the Rye Town Records under date of 1720, in Bolton's History, {1st ed. vol. ii. p- 341) and copied in Baird's Rye and Bolton's second edition. This list was probably one of the proprie- tors of some part of the grants embracing the present township of Rye. The terms of the settlement with Rye of adjoining lands with Colonel Heathcote's representatives, about which there was dispute are thus set forth, in "Notes of agreement between Rye and Devisees of Heath- cote," in the writer's jDOssession: — "Rye is to give us their title to all lands which we claim in Harrison's purchase, as also to all the lands lying between the old Collony Line and Mamaroneck River and the White plains. We are to give them the benefit of the covenants in Jamison's deed to Coll. Heathcote for the purchase lands." This was carried out by a deed from Robert Bloomer, John Budd, Samuel Purdy, John Horton, Nathan Kniffen, John Disbrow, Samuel Brown, Roger Park, Joseph Galpin, Abra- ham Brundige, and nineteen other inhabitants of Rye and White plains, to Mrs. Ann de Lancey and Mrs. Martha Johnston dated September 5th 1739 for all the lands referred to in the above agreement.' In connection with these matters it must be borne in mind that when the first claim of the Rye people was defeated by the verdict against them in favor of Mrs. Richbell of Decembers, 1696, they were already greatly angered by the grant of the Patent to John Harrison and his associates for what has ever since been known as "Harrison's Purcha-=e" by the Governor of New York, on the 25th of June 1696, about six monAs ' Baird's History of Rye, p. 156. The same erroneous statement was copied from Baird into the second edition of Bolton's Westchester, vol. ii. p. 568. > So styled in Baird, Hist. Eye, p. 156. 3 From an ancient copy of the deed in the writer's possession. before the verdict was rendered. They claimed that territory under an Indian deed to Peter Disbrow and three others of 2d June 1662, for " a certain tract of land above Westchester Path to the marked trees bounded with the above said Blind Brook," (this is the whole description) and as being in Connecticut of which they insisted Rye was a part, but they never would take out a patent for it. Hence when the Quaker Harrison, and his four or five associates, ap- plied to the New York government for a grant of it as "unappropriated and vacant land" it was, after due deliberation, granted them by Patent. In order to quiet the border disputes of that day they had pre- viously tried to get the people of Rye to take out a patent for this land, but they always refused to do so. This grant for Harrison's Purchase, and the Richbell verdict coming only about six months after it, was more than the Rye people thought they could bear, and therefore, early in 1697, they revolted, seceded from New York, and again set themselves up as a part of Connecticut. The New York government by peaceful means tried to bring them back, but in vain, and this secession continued for about three years, until King William by a sharp " Order in Council," made on the 28th of March, 1700, ordered them back to the old jurisdiction, in the words of the order "forever thereafter to remain under the Government of the Province of New York." * That government in the beginning had even tendered them a Patent, and Colonel Heathcote, who was one of the Gover- nor's Council, at the request of the latter, in 1697 went to Rye, and personally endeavored to settle the controversy. His letter to the Governor and Council describing his visit and its failure, gives the facts of the case very clearly, and they prove that their own folly lost the Harrison lands to the people of Eye. "I asked them" he says, "why they did not take out a patent when it was tendered them. They .said they never heard that they could have one. I told them that their argument might pass with such as knew nothing of the matter, but that I knew better; for that to my certain knowledge they might have had a patent had they not rejected it; and that it was so far from being done in haste or in the dark, that not a boy in the whole Town, nor almost in the County, but must have heard of it ; and that I must always be a witness against them, not only of the many mes- sages they have had from the Government about it, but likewise from myself " * * * * " I told them as to the last purchase wherein I was concerned, if that gave them any dissatisfaction, that I would not only quit my claim, but use my in- terest in getting them any part of it they should de- sire. Their answer was, they valued not that; it was Harrison's Patent that was their ruin."* * iT. Col. Hist. G27. 5 Vol. xii. p. 36 of the Col. Mss. in Sec. of State's office, Albany. It is printed in Baird's Hist, of Rye, p. 100. MAMARONECK. 883 Some five years after the granting of the West Patent to Robert Walter and his associates in 1701, the southern part of it on the Byram River was, in derogation of their rights, granted to Anne Bridges and four others of the town of Rye. The West Paten- tees remained quietly in possession however of all their territory. About twenty-three years after the issu- ing of the West Patent, and about two after Colonel Heathcote's death, a suit in ejectment was brought, by the persons named in the Bridges grant of 1705-6 against Robert Walter and other owners of the West Patent. The resisons for it are now unknown as the latter had never been disturbed in the possession of their lands by any-body. It was unsuccessful how- ever. The following curious and interesting paper entitled " A true state of the case," gives all the facts, and also shows how thoroughly Colonel Heathcote was even then considered " authority" in West- chester County matters. Its author, evidently a law- yer, is unknown, but it is in the small, clear, beauti- ful, handwriting of Peter Fauconnier an owner, by trust or by purchase, in all three of the great Patents above mentioned, and one of the best surveyors of that day. It is printed from the original in the writer's possession. " A true state of the case, Between the ejector John Horton &c., and Robert Walter &c., in behalf of the ejected, for lands in Westchester County. " Coll. Caleb Heathcote well acquainted with the North bounds of the Tract of land called Well's and Coxe's purchases, being the lands long before claimed by, and since patented to, the Town of Rye the 11th day of August 1720; " With the East and Xorth bounds of the lands granted the 25th day of June, 1698, to William Nicoll Esq., Ebenezer Willson, David Jamison, John Harri- son, and Samuel Haight, called Harrison's purchase ; " With the North bounds of the lands claimed by the Inhabitants of White Plains ; " With the Eastmost bounds of the several con- tiguous tracts of land granted the 23rd day of Decem- ber, 1684, to Frederick Phillipse, and the course of Brunks river; " With the South bounds of those granted the 17th of June, 1697, to Coll. Stephen Cortlandt ; " With the North and West bounds of the lands be- longing to the Town of Bedford ; " And well knowing how, and where, the three several lines which have to divide this Province from the Colony of Connecticut, are to fall and to run, and consequently the location, extent, and limits, of the then still vacant lands adjoining thereunto ; he did acquaint there with the Persons hereinafter named jointly with, and for the use of, whom, with and by the assistance of Joseph Theale, John Horton, Joseph Purdy, Nathaniel Selcick, Richard Scofeiid, James Mott, and Henry Disbrow, he did wholly and law- fully purchase the same. "Being all that certain tract of laud in the County of Westchester, bounded Northerly by the Manor of Cortlandt, Easterly with Bedford line of three miles square, the Whitefeilds, and Byram River, Southerly by the Colony second line, Rye line stretching to Byram River, the land of John Harrison, and the White Plains, and Westerly by Brunk's river and the Manuor of Philipsburgh. On the return of which purchase the said Coll. Heathcote and his associates applyed for, and on the 14th day of February- 1701-2, obtained the Crown's Grant for the same. To Robert Walter, Leigh Atwood, Cornelius Depyster, Caleb Heathcote, Mathew Clarkson, John Cholwell, Rich- ard Slater, Lancaster Symes, Robert Lurting [in Quest for the said Coll. Heathcote again] and Barue Cosens, under £6, 5. — Quitrent. " Notwithstanding all w'''' yet, and the said lands being vacant and unappropriated, the purchass there- of was so lawfully made, and the grant obtained: Oq the 12th day of January, 1706, being near five years after, Anne Bridges, John Clap, Augustin Graham, John Horton, and Thomas Height, on a wrong notion of an insufficiency of power and authority in the then Lieutenant-Governour to grant the above mentioned tract to the above named purchasers thereof, and on such other groundless surmises, did sue for and then obtained, an other posterior grant for the Southern part of the same individual tract of Land : " It being for A certain tract of land in the county of Westchester within the Province of New York, be- ginning at a Beach tree standing by Byram river near a great rock, markt with the letters I. H. I. P. I. C, '[ thence running up the said river North North West to a certain Ash Tree, on the upper end of a place commonly called Pondpound's Neck, marked with [ the letters aforesaid &c to the Colony line. Westerly j to the eight miles stake standing between three white oak trees markt [viz.] one of the said trees is marked with the letters C C R on the north side and Y D on the south side, and from the said trees on a direct line, runs to the Northernmost corner of Rye pond, and thence south ten degrees Westerly to a white oak sap- ling marked by the Pond side with the letters T. I. P. thence by a range of marked trees south sixty four degrees East to an Ash Tree standing by Blind Brook on the East side thereof, and thence by another range of marked trees to a certain Chestnut tree markt with , the letters J. P. on the North side, on the West side, with the letters I. P. on the south side with the letters I. H. and thence by a range of marked trees to the place where it begun. " That this last-mentioned grant is all included in, and that the east, south, and most of the west bounds thereof are, the very same with the southmost ] ones specified in the aforementioned grant of the 14th I February, 1701-2 to Robert Walter &c., will unques- I tionably appear by comparing the southern bounds I of the one with those of the other, and both with the I northern bounds of the Patent granted the 11th day 884 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. of August, 1720, to Samuel Purdy and others for the Township of Rye, and with the eastern and northern bounds of that granted to William Nicoll &c., the 25th day of June, 1696, called Harrison's Lands, or Harrison's Purchase. "Matters relating to that affair being in reality as hath been related, the several questions which do naturally arise therefrom, are, first, what could induce these last Patentees to sue for a Grant of that land in 1705-6, which they well knew had been already patentedin 1701-2. Secondly, Why, having been atthe trouble and charges thereof, they not only left the said first Patentees so long quietly owne, but also survey the same, and not only be present thereat without the least objection, but also shew them the East and North lines of Well's and Harrison's pur- chasses ; to let them dispose of several pieces part of it, and the buyers thereof without interruption en- joy the same about 23 years after that first grant was obtained ; and lastly what could induce them, so late then to serve a Lease of Ejectment on it." The answers to these questions we are left to con- jecture, as except the boundaries of the patents it refers to, which accompany it. Nothing else appears on the paper. It is apparently part of a lawyer's statement of facts, upon which to base an opin- ion. It would seem from the statement itself that the Bridges Patent was granted on the idea that Lieutenant-Governor Nanfan for some reason not stated, had not the power to issue the West Patent when he did, and that it was therefore of no effect. An utterly false idea, for his power as Com- mander-in-chief was exactly that of all Governors- in -chief, as set forth in the royal " Instructions " to each of them. The West Patent remained, undis- turbed, and is the foundation of the jjresent title to the region covered by it (now New Castle and a large part of North Castle and a part of Bedford). The suit was probably a scheme of some lawyer, or some person, who was a personal or political oppo- nent of some one or more of the proprietors of the West Patent, for the value of the land then was en- tirely too little to induce a speculative action. The following is the text of the West Patent from a certi- fied copy of 1734, in the writer's possession. THE WEST PATENT. Recorded at the request of Robt. Walters d: others. William the third by the grace of God of England Scotland fi'rance & Ireland King Defender of the ffaith &c, To all to whom these presents shall come or may consern Greeting Whereas — our Loving Subjects Rob- ert Walters Leigh Attwood Cornelius Depeyster Caleb Heathcote Matthew Clarkson John ChoUwell Richard Slater Lancater Simes Robert Lurting & Barne Copens have by their petitions presented unto our trusty & wellbeloved John Nanfan Esq', our Leiut', Gov', & Commander in Cheif of our Province of New York and the territories depending thereon in America &c. prayed our Grant & confirmation of a Certain tract of Land in our County of West Chester Bounded North- erly by the Mannor of Courtlandt Easterly with Bedford Line of three Miles Square the white feilds & Byram River Southerly by the Land of John Har- rison Rye line Stretching to Byram River afores*, & the White plains & Westerly by Bronckx river &the Mannor of phillipsburgh excepting out of the bounds aforesaid all theLand within Richbells patent now in the tenure & Occupation of Coll Caleb Heathcote which first above named tract of Land was purchased by Caleb Heathcote & others with whom he has agreed excepting James Mott& Henry Disbrowwhom he hath undertaken to Satisfy within which bounds there are by Estimation about five thousand Acres of profitable Land besides Waste & Woodland which reasonable request we being willing to grant Knoii Ye that of our Special Grace certain knowledge & meer motion we have given granted ratified & con- firmed and by these presents do for us our heirs & Successors give grant ratify & confirm unto our Said Loving Subjects Robert Walters Leigh Attwood Cornelius Depeyster Caleb Heathcote M. Clarkson Jn° ChoUwell Rich'' Slater Lancaster Symes Robert Lurting & Barne Cosens all the aforesaid tract of Land within our County of Westchester & within the limitts & bounds afores'^ together with all and Singular the woods underwoods trees timber feedings pastures meadows marshes swamps ponds poolles waters water Courses rivers rivulets runs brooks Streams fishing ffowling hunting & hawking mines Mineralls (silver and Gold mines Excepted) and all other profitts benefitts priviledges Libertys advantages Hereditaments & Appurtenances whatsoever to the afores'' tract of Land within the limitts & bounds afores* belonging or innywise appertaining To have and to hold all the aforesaid tract of Land together with all & Singular the woods underwoods trees timbers feed- ings pastures Meadows Marshes Swamps ponds pools waters water Courses Rivers Rivuletts runs brooks Streams fishing fowling Hunting and Hawking Mines Mineralls Silver and Gold mines Excepted & all other profits benefits priviledges Libertys Advantages He- reditaments & appurtenances whatsoever to the afores'' tract of Land in this the Limitts & bounds afores'' belonging or in any way appertaining unto them the said Robert Walters Leigh Atwood Cornelius Depey- ster Caleb Heathcote Matthew Clarkson John ChoU- well Richard Slater Lancaster Symes Rob' Lurting and Barne Cosens their heirs and assigns to the only proper use benefit & behoof of them the S"* Robert Leigh Attwood Cornelius Depeyster Caleb Heathcote M Clarkson, Jn", ChoUwell Lancaster Symes Richard Slater Robert Lurting & Barne Cosens their heirs & Assigns for ever To be Holden of us our heirs & Suc- cessors in free & Common Socage as of our Mannour of East Greenwich in our County of Kent within our Realm of England Yeilding rendering & paying there- fore Yearly & every Year for ever at our City of New MAMARONECK. 885 York unto us our heirs and Successors or to Such Of- ficer Or Officers as shall from time to time be im- powered to receive the same the Annual & Yearly rent of Six pounds five Shillings Current money of New York in Leiu & stead of all other rents dues duties Services demands vv'soever In Testimony where- of we have caused the great Seal of our said Prov- ince to be hereunto affixed Witness John Xanlan Esq^ our Leiu': Governour and Commander in Cheif of our province of New York & the territories depending thereon in America & Vice Admiral of the same &c at our ffbrt in New York the fourteenth day of ffeb^ A* 1701, & in the thirteenth Year of our Reign John Nanfan, By his Hon" Command M. Clarkson Secry. Secry« Office N York Mar 22d 173i A true Copy from the Record ffred" Morris, D Secry Compared with the Record A L D It will be noticed how carefully this patent by ex- press words excepted and preserved to Colonel Heath- cote his lands under the Richbell Patent, which in part were covered by its boundaries. The portion of this Patent in Bedford under the deed from Katonah above given, became the subject of controversy — and remained unsettled till 1771, when the dispute was finally terminated by the following mutual Agree- ment, the original of which is in the writer's pos- session. Agreement between the Proprietors of the West Patent and Bedford. " It is this day agreed between the proprietors of that part of the West Patent in Westchester County which was released to the said proprietors by Caleb Fowler Benjamin Smith, & Joseph Sutton & the persons settled upon the same Lands and claiming a title thereto under the Township of Bedford, that the whole matters in Dispute between the said parties, shall be submitted to the arbitration of Richard Willis & William Seaman of Jerico, George Town- send of Norwich, Thomas Hicks, & Hendrick Onder- donk of the Township of Hempstead, & all of Queens County, Gent". That the whole matters Differ- ences in Dispute between the said parties shall be submitted to the determination of the said refTerees or any three or more of them without any Exception whatever. That Bonds shall be executed mutually each in the penall sum of £5000 New York Money ' to stand to the award of the said Refli'erees or any three or more of them. That the award shall be made and ready to be delivered to the parties or some of them on or before the first day of September next. That if the Arbitrators or any three or more of them shall award the Lands in Dispute to be the property of the proprietors claiming under the West Patent, then the 1 12,500 dollars. said RefTerees or any three or more of them are to award what sum the persons claiming under Bedford are to pay by the acre for the said Lands and the West Patent proprietors are, upon payment thereof, to release all their right in the Lands to the persons claiming under Bedford, & shall warrant & Defend them agt. all persons claiming under the West Patent. The Improvements are not to be valued, and if the RefJ'erees or any three or more of them award that the proprietors of the West Patent are not entitled to the Lands in Dispute but that the same are the prop- erty of the claimants under Bedford, then that the former shall release all their right to the latter of, in, and to, the Lands in Dispute. Dated this 27th day of March 1771, John Bard \ David Clarkson V in Behalf of the West Thomas Jones ' ) Patent Proprietors. James Wright I in Behalf of the claim- John Lawrence J ants under Bedford. Under this agreement the settlement was made, the Bedford people paying about eight shillings per acre, it is believed, for the land to the proprietors of the West Patent. A somewhat similar settlement had been made six years before, in 1765, by the Proprietors of the Mid- dle Patent, or "the Whitefields Patent" as it was often called, which adjoined the West Patent on the East, by a like arbitration with Samuel Banks and some twenty four others, who having bought the rights of two or three of the Patentees entered upon, and took possession of the whole of that Patent, the grant for which is as follows: THE MIDDLE PATENT. {The Wliitefields). " William the Third, by the grace of God, of Eng- land, Scotland, France, and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, &c., to all to whom these presents shall come or may concern, sendeth greeting : Whereas our loving subjects Col. Caleb Heathcote, Joseph Theal, John Horton, Joseph Purdy, Robert Walters, Leigh Atwood, Matthew Clarkson, Lancaster Sims, Cornelius Depeyster, Richard Slater, John Chollwell, Robert Lurting, and Barne Cosens, have by their petition, presented unto our trusty and well beloved John Nan- fan, Esq., our Lieut. Governor and Commander-in- chief of our Province of New York and territories depending thereon in America, &c., and prayed our grant and confirmation of a certain tract of land in the county of Westchester, bounded southerly by the colony line of Connecticut, easterly by Mahanas river, northerly by Bedford line and marked trees to Mahanas river again, and southerly as the said river 2 Then recorder of New York, and later Judge of the Supreme Court, the .\uthor of the History of New York during the Krvolutiouary War. n* represented the Ileathcota estate, his wife, Anne De Lancej, being a granddaughter of Colonel Heathcote. f 886 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. goes against the stream to ye head of the said river, and so to the said colony line, which said tract of land on the 5th day of July last past, was by our said Caleb Heathcote, Joseph Theal, John Horton and Joseph Purdy, &c., purchased of the native proprie- tors, and containing within the limits aforesaid, by estimation, about 1500 acres of profitable land, be- sides wastes and wood lands, which reasonable request, we being willing to grant, know ye, that of our espe- cial grace, certain knowledge and mere motion, we have given, granted, ratified and confirmed, and by these presents doe for us, our heirs and successors, give, grant, ratify and confirm unto our said loving subjects. Col. Caleb Heathcote, Joseph Theal, John Horton, Joseph Purdy, Robert Walters, Leigh At- wood, Matthew Clarkson, Lancaster &ims, Cornelius Depeyster, Richard Slater, John Chollwell, Robert Lurting and Barne Cosens, all the afore recited tract of land within the county of Westchester, and within the limits and bounds aforesaid, together with all and singular the woods, underwoods, trees, timber, feed- ings, pastures, meadows, marshes, swamps, ponds, pools, waters, water- courses, rivers, rivulets, runs, brooks, streams, fishing, fowling, hunting, hawking, mines, minerals, &c., (silver and gold mines ex- cepted,) and all other profits, benefits, privileges, lib- erties, advantages, hereditaments and appurtenances whatsoever to the aforesaid tract of land, within the limits and bounds aforesaid, belonging or in any way or ways appertaining, unto them the said Colonel Caleb Heathcote, &c., &c., their heirs and assigns to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of him the ■said Colonel Caleb Heathcote, &c., &c., their heirs and assigns for ever, to be holden of us, our heirs and successors, in free and common soccage as of our manor of East Greenwich in our county of Kent, within our realm of England, yielding, rendering, and paying therefor yearly and every year, on the first day of the Nativity of our Blessed Saviour, the annual yearly rent of one pound, seven shillings and six- pence, current money of New York, in lieu and stead of all other rents, dues, duties, services and demands whatsoever. In testimony whereof, we have caused the great seal of our said Province to be hereunto af- fixed. Witness John Nanfan, Esq., our Lieutenant Oovernor and Commander-in-chief of our Province of New York and territories depending thereon in America, and Vice-Admiral of the same, at our Fort in New York, this 17th day of February, 1701-2, and in the fourteenth year of our reign.'' ' "JoHx Naxfax." This, the smallest of the three Great Patents, was held by its Patentees without a division of their interests till 1733, when the following appointment of Samuel Purdy to lay it out was made : "New York Aug. y«. 20'": 1733. " We the Undersigned owners and Proprietors of a 1 Book of Patents, No. vii. 224, Sec. of State's Office, Albany. certain Tract of Land, Called Whitefeild^ in the County of Westchester, Do authorize and appoint Samuel Purdy, Esq^ to Lay out and Divide the said Lands in Order To our coming to an Entire Division of the Same, to Each Respective Pattentee or his assigns. Witness our Hands James De Lancey D. Clarkson C. D'Peyster P. Fauconnier John Symes Josiah Quimby. Memorand". for Justice Purdy to take Notice where the Division Line between Greenwich and Stamford falls upon the Colony Line. A true copy From y' Originall by Sam'. Purdy." ' Mr. Purdy accepted the appointment and acted. He divided the Patent into two parts which he called the " East " and " West " Ranges, containing thirteen " Lotts " each. The number of acres in each is not now known, but the value of each lot is shown by the original list and valuation by Purdy, in the writer's possession, which is as follows: — An Estimate of the Lotts in Whitefield Pattent. East Bange. No. £ 1 93 00 2 93 00 3 85 00 4 85 00 5 80 00 6 54 00 7 44 00 8 44 00 9 44 00 10 44 00 11 50 OU 12 62 00 13 72 00 Wefct Range. Ko. £ 1 73 00 2 78 00 3 85 00 4 95 00 5 95 00 6 92 00 7 77 00 8 77 00 9 84 00 10 88 00 11 95 00 12 100 00 13 100 00 £850 00 £1139 00 850 00 Totall £1989 00 Pr me Sam" Purdy. The names of the persons living on this Patent six years after Purdy's appointment above given were collected by Benjamin Fox of King Street and sent to Mr. Murray of New York, who was the lawyer and agent of some of the patentees. Under date of " King St. 8"' y' 7'", 1739," Fox writes Murray, "Inclosed have sent you the names of the People Possessed on the Whitefeild, or Middle Patent, which have Indev- our* to colect a.s well as I could." The list which is on a separate paper, is as follows : ^ This name, singularly enough ia so spelled in all the old deeds and documents. It should, of course, have been " Whitefielda." 3 From an ancient copy in the writer's possession, in Samuel Purdy's handwriting. MAMARONECK. 887 Thos. Hutehius Thos. Meritt John Euuells, Sen' John Runells Juu' Benj. Piatt Jacob Finch Sam" Banks Owens John Finch John Brush Benj Brush Sam" Peters Ebius Brock Francis Purdy John Purdy ' When, twenty-five years later, the final settlement of 1765, between the patentees and the settlers above referred to, was made, the parties then in possession, whose names are recited in the award, were ; — Sam" Banks, John Banks, Benoy Piatt, Jonathan Piatt, John Runnels, Jonathan Owens, John Rundle, John Arm- strong, Roger Sutherland, Smith Sutherland, Charles Green, Charles Green, Jun'', David Brundige, Walter Morris, Aaron Furman, Jun'^, Shubel Brush, James Brundige, Stephen Edegett, Nehemiah Brundige, Abraham Knapp, Joshua Lounsbery, Daniel Brown, Jun', Phinehas Knapp, Jeremiah Numan, Rober Murfee, Jeremiah Green. Some of these names appear in Fox's list of 1739, but only a few. The arbitrators in 1765 were : " Daniel Kissam, Samuel Townsend, George Weekes, Benjamin Tread- well and David Batty, all of Queens County" and their award dated October 6, 1765, recites that they, " having sat as arbitrators and heard the said disputes, and having deliberately heard, examined, and consid- ered all the proofs and allegations of the said Parties in Controversy, do for the settling peace and amity between them make this our award, order, arbitra- ment, determination, and judgment of and upon the Premises as Follows — First, We do award and order, that the said Anne De Lancey, John Bard, Pierre De- peyster, David Clarkson, Peter Remsen, and John Ogelbie, and all others who claim lands under the said Patent which are not already sold or conveyed to the persons now in possession of the said lands, or to those under whom they claim, or to some or one of them, shall and do upon demand execute and deliver in due form of law a release of all their rights and Titles of, in, and to, the lands specifyed in the said Letters Patent, to said Samuel Banks and the other persons above named who are now in possession of the said Lands, and to their heirs and assigns forever; and that the said Samuel Banks and the other per- sons above named, who are now in possession of the said Lands, shall and do upon the delivery of such Release pay unto the said Anne De Lancey and such other persons as are hereby ordered to Execute the said Release, the sum of nine Shillings New York money '- for every acre of said lands, which the said Samuel Banks and the other persons above named or those under whom they claim, or some or one of them, have not already purchased of some, or one, of the 1 Original letter and list in the writer's possession. ^One dollar and twelve centK. patentees in the said Letters Patent Named, or of those claiming under the said patentees, or some or one of them." ^ The East I'atent was granted March 2'* 1701 to the same Patentees as the West Patent with the addition to their number of Peter Jlatthews of Bedford. Five days before, on the 25th of February in the same year, Katonah, Wakemane, and another Indian exe- cuted a deed of confirmation to the Patentees of their right and estate in the tract* in which they thus de- scribe, " bounded as followeth viz. Westward by Bed- ford, and by the patent granted to Caleb Heathcote and others,' northerly by Coll. Cortlandt's purchase and Croton's river, southerly and easterly by the Col- ony lines." The patent itself in its general language is similar to those of the West and Middle Patents above set forth. It bounds the Tract granted in these words ; — The East Patent Boxmds " Bounded South, by the division Line between New York and Connecticut, East, by the other division Line between New York and Connec- ticut, and so along said Line untill it meets with the Patent of Adolf Philipse,* and so along his southern bounds till it meets with the Mannor of Cortlandt, and from thence by a Line that shall run upon a direct course untill it meets with the first easterly Line of twenty miles of the said Mannor of Cortlandt, aiid from thence along the said Line Westerly till it meets with the Patent granted to R. Walter and others,' thence southerly along the said Patent, untill it meets with the bounds of the Town- ship of Bedford, and thence round along said bounds until it meets with the Patent granted to Coll. Heath- cote and others, and* thence along the bounds of said Patent unto the Colony Line where it began." No attempt was made to settle this tract till about the year 1744, when parties from Stamford and its neighborhood acquired portions of land within its limits. The area of these three great Patents, the " West," the " Middle," and the " East," was very much greater than is commonly supposed. The Patents themselves only give their respective areas in what those instru- ments term " profitable land," that is, land that could be easily cultivated. But as the greater part of north- ern and central Westchester abounded in high semi- mountainous ridges, rocky heights, and great forests, characteristics which to a large extent it still retains, the " profitable land " really bore but a small pro- portion to what was then deemed the unprofitable land. How very extensive these great patents really ' From the original award signed by all the arbitrators, in the writer's posspssion. * Book I. p. 100, Sec. of State's Offe. Allmnj. *The "Middle Patent." •Pliilipse's Upper Patent, now Putnam County. 7 The W'est Patent. 8 The Middle Patent. 888 HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY. were, will be seen from the following authentic state- ment : Peter Fauconnier, who was a surveyor, and as has been stated, an owner in all three patents, was, with Lancaster Symes, the active managers for the own- ers of all three patents. An account showing the amounts due from each owner, arranged under, the head of each Patent separately, dated in 1716, in the handwriting of Fauconnier is in the writer's posses- sion, and it shows that the three Patents together con- tained seventy thousand, 70,000, Acres of Land. The headings of the accounts of the three patents are these ; — " The first of the 3 Patents above mentioned con- taining about 30,000 acres of rough Land, between 10 Patentees." ^ " The Second of the 3 Patents here-above mentioned containing about 5000 acres of rough Land, between 13 Patentees." ' " The Third of the 3 Patents here-above mentioned containing about 35,000 acres of rough Land, between 11 Patentees."' In a " statement of the three Patents " which has already been given, showing the dates of the Patents, the Patentees' names, and the boundaries granted by each, the areas of each are set down in what that doc- ument calls "Improvable Land," corresponding to 1 The "West Patent." 2 The Middle Patent. 3 The " East Patent." the " Profitable Land '' of the Patents themselves. As will be seen, by referring to it, that document gives for the different Patents these areas ; — In the West Patent, 5,000 Acres Improvable Land, In the Middle Patent, 1,500 Acres Improvable Land, In the East Patent, 6,200 Acres Improvable Laud, In all together, 12700 Acres Improvable Land, which is not quite one sixth of the actual area of the terri- tory of the three Patents by Fauconnier's account. As the whole Manor of Cortlandt north of the Cro- ton River and east of the Hudson containing 5000 acres was only valued in 1732 at £9625 or §25,062,* and as the twenty six lots of the "Middle Patent" were only valued in 1733, at £1989,* or about $5,000^ both valuations being made for the respective pro- prietors by the same man. Justice Samuel Purdy, and as the Patentees of the latter were only awarded nine shillings, one dollar and twelve cents, an acre, for their unsold lands in the same patent in 1765, a gen- eration later, it is easily seen how very little, was the actual value of the 70,000 acres of the three great pat- ents when they were granted, and during the lifetime of their original Patentees. These facts also show how careful we should always be in considering these mat- ters not to judge of estates in the 17th, and 18th, cen- turies in Westchester County, large or small, by the values of, either the early, or the latter part of the 19th century. * See in Part 13, ante, p. 135. 5 See ante, p. 886. INDEX. Al'ralinm Vosbiirgh Post, 511. Abrahainson. R., 123. Acaileiiiy of Sorth Salem, 133. Acconimoiiation, Plan of, 273. Adams, S., 198. Addressee, etc., to InhabitantB of Cortlandt, 219. Address to King, 231. Advertisements, 172, 183. Advowstin, 93. Agricultural Products, .')22, 66n. Agriculture (See Indians) of settlers, 31, 178. Aid Societies, 504. Algonquins, 10. ' .\lison, \., 1. Allen, J., 323. .\lloUial (.See Land), 8. Alsop, J., 341. Amsterdam, Bank of, 58. Audros, H)2. Anthony's Nose, .'>. Archbishop of Canterbury, 107. Archer, Jno., 77(1. Arrow Heads, Indian, 14. Art, WK). Assembly, General, 223, 234, G4!). Assessors, 98, 99. Association of Cortlandt Manor, 220. Atitochthonic Theory, 9,35. Axe, Indian, 1.5. B. Badeau, J., 63.5. Baird, H. M., 63« Riird's " History of Rye," cited, 3. Baird, Chaa. W., 620. Biinta, M., 562, 50:}. Barrett, J., 029. BiU-Hnv, Rev. .1., 109, 170. Bartlett, W. H. C.,021. Bartram, X. B., 492. Bathgate, J., 692. Beal, \Vm. R., 833. Beach, W. A., .-)59. Beavers, 13. Bcecher. H. W., 627. Bench and Bar, 526. Benson, E., 348. Bigelow, J., 023. Bill of Rights and Grievances, 229. Bills of Sale (See Deeds). Bixby, S. M., 832 Blake, J., 192, 324. Blind Brook Creek, 6. Block, A., 2, 22,37,38. Blommaert, S., 49. Blue Bell Tavern, il2j. Boats, Indian, 14. Rockland, 80. Bolton R., 607. Bouuer, B., 6.35. Books, 17.i. Booth, Jonathan, 325. I Booth, Joseph, 320. Boston Port Bill, 189, 190. Boulder, 9. Boundary — of Westchester County, 2, 113, 114. between New York and Connecticut, map of, 3. agreement as to, 4. settlement of, 5. Bounty Bonds, 505. Bout, J. E., 68, 69. Bow, Indian, 15. Brewster, J. B., 700, 701. Bronx, Herr, 23. Bronx River (See River), 709. Broucksland, map, 769. Brown Bluffs, 324. Brom, Nehemiah, 528. Bucktails, 485. Budd, G., 301. Burghers, 59. Burials, Mohegan, 16. Burke, 225. Burr, A., 539. Butler, J., 173. Butler, W. A., 629. Byram River, 4. Lake, 5. C. Camp, Hugh N., 8;il. Canon Law. 05. Cantantonit, 17. Capitulation (See Dutch). Carlton, D., 2. Carpenter. J., 699. Carpenter, W. J., 598. Cauldwell, AV. 624. Cemeteries, 738. Ceremonial Stone, Indian, 15. Charles II., 3, 87, 103. Cliarles Lawrence Post, 514. Charters, 2. Chatterton Hill, Attack of, 440, 441. Cheltenham Manor, 97. Christiansen (See C'orstaensen), 2, 37. Church (See .\dvowson, Connecticut, Dutch, Land, Parish, Government), 98, 107. of England, Kstablisbment, 100, 104, 107. Support, 163, 164. Influence, 173. Churches — of Early Times, 472c. of King's Bridge, 756. of Mamaroueck, 870. of Morrisania. 823. of New Rochelle, 692. of Pelhani, 7o7. of Scarsdale, 065. of West Farms, 836. of Westchester Town, S09. of White Plains, 7-23, 732. Civil History, 039. Civil List, 646. Civil War, 490. Clergy (See Church). Clerks, 653. Clinton, De Witt, 484. Clinton, G., 168, 223, 484. Clothing- Indian, 13. of Settlers, 30, 170. Cobb, L., 038. Cobbling Stone, 8. Coffee, Rev. W. S., 634. Coffin, 0. T., 550. Cole, Key. D., 630. Colegate, R., 765. Colen Donck. 66. Collation, lo7. Colonial Assembly, 647. Period, 101. Commissaries, 107. Commissioners, 654. Committee on Conspiracies, 341, 374. County, 200. District, 289. of Correspondence, 182, 188, 23:5. of Fifty-one, 186. of Inspection, 238. of Observation, 215. of One Hundred, 274. of Safety, 297, 404, 048. of Sixty, 215. on Government, 382. Commons, 59. Companies and Regiments, 5o7. Congress (See Continental Congress, Provincial Congress). Connecticut- Boundaries between, and New York, 2, 16, 641. English and Dutch Claims to, 3. Grant to, 3. Connittelsock, 2. Constitution, 643, 644. Constitutional Commission, 64U. Conventions, 648. Continental Congress, 204, 212, '270, 277, 294, 330,3.55,356,304, 651. Cooper, J. P., 608. Copyhold (See Land). Cornbury, Lord, 105. Cornell, B., 075. Corstaensen, 37, 38. Counties, Division of Province into, 112. County Organization, 111. County-seat, 044. Cortlandt Manor, 90, 109, 115. Hanor-Honse, 127. Court-House, 729. Court Leet, 87, 91, 92. Courts, 042, 043, 651. Cozzens, F. S., 629. Cromwell, D., 740. Cromwell Post, 515. 889 890 INDEX. Cromwell, C. T., 552. Gross, John, 26. Cross Lake, 5. Croton Aqueduct, 796. Crotou Lake, 5. River, 6. Crown, English, 107. Grants, 96. Cultivation, Indian, 13. Culver, C. E., 637. Currency, Continental, 478/. Curry, Rev. D., 620, 621. D. Davenport, John, 25. Davidson, M. 0., 835. Dawson, H.B ., 612. Declaration at White Plains, 248. Declaratory Act, 236. Deed, 67, 71. De Lancey Family, Genealogy of, 862. De Lancey, Rt. Rev. Wm. H., 867. De Lancey, J., 91, 130. De Lancey, S., 133, 169. De Lanceys' feud with Livingstons, 264. Delaware Chief, 32. Family, 33. De Luet, D., 32. Democracy — De Tocqueville on, 1. Alison on, 1. Depew, C. M., 557. De Rasieres, I., 43. Dermer, Capt. Thomas, 39, 40. De Tocqueville, 1. De Vries, D. P., 68. Disbrow House, 856. Discovery (See Hudson), 20, 745, T68. Right of, 35. Dissenters, 25. District Attorneys, 653. Doctors, 568. Domesday Book, 86. Dongan, Thos., 156. Dongan, T., 104, 127,161. Doughty, E., 72. Doughty, F., 70. Doughty, M., 70. Dowling, Rev. J., 75. Downing, Sir G., 74. Draft Riots, 499. Drafted Men, 508. Drake, G., 299,334. Drake, J., 164. Drake, J. R., 616. Drake, S., 329. Draper, J. W., 6.35. Dross of the People, 461, 462. Drunkenness, Indian, 17. Diiane, J., 193, 202, 203, 213. Dutch- Capitulation, 76. Charters, 2. Church, 62(1. East India Company, 2, 21. Government, 57, 68. Grants, 38, 83. Religion, 64, 77. Settlements, 2, 22, 24, 37, 100, 640, 715, 745- States-General, 58. States Provincial, 58. Tenures, 63. War with Indians, 19. "War with Spain, 21. West India Company, 2, 18, 22, 25, 39, 41, 45, 63, 68, 75, 640. Dutcher, W.. 298, 299. Dyckman family, 764. Dyckman, J. 0., 533. E. East India Company, 2, 21, 37. Eastern State Journal, 498. Eaton, Theophilus, 25. Education, 525. Elkins, Henry, 39. Elections (see Politics), War, 109, 110, 124, 125, 126, 239, 644. Emancipation, 3U. Embargo, 484. English (See Church). Equivalent Tract, 4, 113, 161. Eunice, 291. Evans, Oliver, 469. Evans, W. W., 699. Ewen, J., 767. Exports, .53. F. Families, 168. Faneuil, P ., 711. Fairs, 111. Farm, 95. Farmer, A. W., 216, 256. Farnsworth Post, 513. Fellows, E. B., 842. Ferguson, G., 700. Ferries, 748, 772. Feud (see De Lancey's). Feudal System, 23, 62, 80, 81. Finances, 524. Findlay, Andrew, 843. Fire Department, 738. Fire Ships, 390. Fisher, G. J., 581. Fishing, 12, 265, 706. Flagg, L. W., 587. Flax, 30. Flushing, 29. Folcland, 80. Fordham, 772. " Kordham Manor, 96, 159. Kordham and the Ferries, 772. Forestalling, 322. Fort Independence, 7.53. Fort William, 167. Fountain, H., 584. Fountain, J,, .577. Fowler, H., 164. Fox, George, 28 Fox, W. W., 845. Franchises, 92. Francis, S., 184. Franklin, B., 171. Free Bridge, 748. People, 67. French War, 167. Freedoms and Exemptions, — First plan of, 46. Second plan of, 54. Third plan of, 57. Summary of, 60. Freeman, K. K., 591. Funeral, 472h. Fur Trade, 21, 44. Furnace Brook, 6. Furniture, Indian, 13. Furniture of 1776. 466. G. Galloway, J., 209, 210. G. A. R., 509. Garrison, F. S., 487. Gavelkind, 83. Gedney, B., 743. Geuei-al .\ssembly (see Assembly). Gentleman in Trade, 180, 182. Geology, 6, 521. Gifford, Silas D., 532. Glebe Lands (see Lauds). Glover, Col., 417. Godyn, Samuel, 49. Gould, J., 635. Government (see Church* — Dutch, 57. English, 78. Indian, 10. Grand Army Posts, 509. Gravesend, 28. Greeley, H., 626. Griswold, R. B., 597. Gymnasium, 697. H. Haines, Godfrey, 291. Hall, E., 563. Hall, H. B., 836. Hamilton, A.., 604. Hammer stones, Indian 15 Hand, N. H., 741. Harlaem, 394. Harlem River, 795. Harlem River, Bridges of, 796. Harrison, General, 35. Harrison, John, 29. Harrison, town of, 30. Hasbrouck family, 585. Haskin, J. B., 561. Hastings, 518. Hatfield's Tavern, 245. Havemeyer, F. C. , 817. H. B. Hidden Post, 514. Head Dress of Ladies, 463, 464. Heathcote, Caleb, 95, 100, 520, 152, 153. Heathcote Hill. 854. Henry II., 27. Henry IV., 27. Henry VIII., 25. High Sheiiff, 109. Highways (see Roads). Hoe-Cake, 13. Hoe, Richard M., 8.32. Hoffman, A. K., 588. Holland (see Dutch). Home Guards, 501. Horatio Seymour Post, 515. Horton, A., 333. Horton, G., 301. House of Good Hope, 2. Houses, Indian, 13. Howe, Lord Admiral, 429. Howe, 367. Hudson, H., 2, 9, 17,18, 21,31. 3" 74.5. 768. Hudson Park, 759. River, 5, 33. Huguenots, 22, 27, 692. Huguenot House, 691. Street, 686. Hulst, P. E., 42. Huntington, H. K., 595. Huntington, C. P.. 818. Husted, J. W., 126. Hutchinson, A., 19. 2 Hutchinson River 6. Hyatt, E., 331. Hyatt, J., 714. I Imports, 53. Indians (see Sales'). — Origin, 9. INDEX. 891 Divisions and Government, 10, 31, 32. Names, 11. Numbers and Food, 12. Cultivation, Dress, Homes, 13. Implements, 14. Medicine, Burials, 15. Religion, 16, ."Jo. Intercourse with Whites, etc., 18,23, 24. Disappeurance, 20. Language, 32. Villages, etc., 34. Title, 35. Indian Hill, 20. luihiction, <>3. Inns, 472j. Institution, 93. Instructions, 103, 104. Internal D\ities, 475. Iron, 12. Iroquois, 10. Irvington, 518. Irving, W., 010. J. James I., 2. James II., 104. Jay family, 582. Jay, J., 195, 215, 239, 347, 536. Jay, J. C.,583. Jay. W., 529. Jessup, Edward, 18. Johnson, I. G., 767. Johnson, S. W., .564. Judges, 652. K. Katskill, 67. Keskeskick, 67. Kieft, Governor, 23, 68. Kieritt's Hoeck, 2. King's Bridge, 517, 744, 748. Kissam, B., 272. Kitchawanes, 11. Kitching Post, 510. Knives, Indian, 15, 16. Ij. Lampo, Jan., 43. Land Ownership, Indian, 11. Land Tenure, — Allodial, 80, 90. Copyhold, 97. of Duke of York, 79. of Glebe, 98. of Farmers, 179. of Patroons, 62. Socage, 82, 89. Wished by Colonists, 45. Larkin, F., 557. Law (see Canon, Roman, York). Lawyers, 526, 549. Lee, C, 304, 324, 3:13, 336. Legislature, 112, 124, 649. Leisler, J., 27, 102. Lester, S., 698. Letter, Revolutionary, 216. Lewis, Dio., 638. Library, 697. Lincoln, A., 489, 491. Lindsley, Chas. E., 694. Literature, 598. Livingston, G., 327. Livingston, P. R., 223. Livingston, P. V., 237. Livingstons (see de Lanceys). Long Island, Battle of, 395. Louis XIII., 27. Louis XIV., 27. Lovatt, E. T., 567. Lovelace, Gov., 104. 91. Macomb's Dam, 758, 797. Mails, 170, 171,681. Maine on Manors, 85. Maize, 9, 13, 30. Mamaroneck, 4, 521 . River, 5. Mamaroneck, Early Reconls and Petitions of, 849, 850, 851. Mamaroneck, First Survey of, 149. JIamaroneck, Town of, 840. Manhattans, 11. Manhattan Island, '22, 40, 44, 68. Manners and Ciistoms, 457. Manufactures, 178. Manors, — Courts, 87, 91,92. Derivation of Word, 87. English, 85, 92. Grants, 96, 124. Lords, 108. New York, Incidents, etc., 90, 93. Origin and History, 31. Order of Erection, 108. Relation to County, 108. Saxon and Norman, 86. Westchester, Six, 91. Mapes, Daniel, 841. Mapes, Leonard, 841. Maps, — Boundary between New York and Con- necticut, 3. Broncksland, 769. Verplanck's, 131. White Plains, 727. Marble, 7. Manufactures, 178, 523, 661. Marriage, Mobegan, 16. Massacre, 755. May, Captain, 22. Jfay, Cornelius Jacobsen, 39, 42. McDougal, A., 2(X). McKeel Post, 512. Medical Profession, 568. Society, 569. Jleuiorial, 232. Menhaden, 13. Merchants and Traders, 181, 132. Meeting in the Fields, 201. Micliaelius, John, 22, 65. Militia, '276. Military, 109, 276. Mills, Powder, 335. Ministry Act, 100. Minuit, Peter, 19, 22, 43, 44. Mohansic Lake, 5. Mohegan Lake, 5. Indians, 10, 33. Montcalm, 167. Jlorell Post, 512. Jloody, Lady Deborah, 28. Morris, A. Newbold, 828. Slorris Family, 826. Morris, G., 188,268, 603. -Morris, Lewis, 826. Jlorris, L., 165, 166, 244, .365. Morris, L. G., 828. .Morris R., 169. Morris, W. H., 828. Jlorrisjinia Manor, 96, 157, 52ii. Morrisaiuia Town, 8*22. Mortars, Indian, 14. Mott, Jordan L., 830. Mount Misery, 19. St. Vincent, 760. Music, 600. N. Names, 111. Nappeckamak, 9. Native Americans, 487. Naval Battle, 389. New -Vmsterdam, 3. New Rochelle, 520. New Netherlands (see Manors). New York, — Boundaries between, and Connecticut, 2, 22, 37, 42, .53, 00, 73, 78. Capture of, 402. City, 77, 516. Poet Boy, 172. Province, 78, 106, 112, 176. New York City and Northern Railroad, 481. Newspapers, 172,179, 303, 471, 482, 084, 738. Nei)erhan River, 0, 68. Nepperhaem, Patent for, 71. New York and Harlem R. R. (see Railroad). New York and Hudson River E. K. (see Rail- road). New York and Northern R. R. (see Railroad). Negroes (see Slavery), 29. Netherlands, history of, 58. New Rochelle, 28, 685. Nicholson, 161, 162. Nicolls, Col. R., 3, 7.5, 76, 103. Nobles, 59. Non-Intercourse Law, 485. Nook-hill, 1.3. Nordquist, C. J., 588. North, 234, 236. North Pond, 5. North Salem (see Academy). O. Oakley, I.. 244. Orth, 170. Oblong, The, 4, 113, 161. Occupations of Settlers, 30. Old Pelhani and New Rochelle, 709. OUiffe, W. M., 744. O'Ncale, H., 71. Oysters, 12. P. Paine, Thos., 002. Parishes, 98. English, in Westchester County, 99. Paiton, J., 623. Patroons (see Tenure), 23, 46, 52, 57, 61. Patroonships, — Colen Donck, 06. Patent,— Nepperhaem, 71. Rykes, 123, 126. York's, 78, 79. Patents, 96, 687, 703, 775, 877, 884, 88.5, 887. of Confirmation, 84. Patuxet, 39, 40. Paulding, J. K., 616. Paupers, 659. Pauw, Michael, 51. Peach Lake, 5. Peale, C. W., 466. Peat, 6. Peekskill, 121. Creek, 6. 892 INDEX. * Pelham, 520, 701. Pumpkins, 13. Sands, D. J., 589, Battle of, 417. Punderson, Rev. E., 94. Scarsdale, 657. Manor, 96, 156. " Purchase," The, 29. Manor, 95, 96. Pell, T., 25, 27. Purdy.S., 558. Tennis Club, 684. Pell, J., 27, 113, 102, IG.J, 1C4, 1G8, 526. Puritans, 25. Station. 683. Pendleton, E., 360. Schepens, .59. Pequots, 10. Schniid, H. E., 588. Petition, 232. Quakers, 28, 166. Schools, 474, 525, 069, 695, 7(17, 723, 737. Philipse, F., 24, 72, 113, 169, 245, 370, 379. Quia Eniptores, 8.5, 88. Sellout, 59. Philipseburg, 72. Quit-Rents, 84, 95, 90. Schout Fiscaal, 43, 66. Philipshorough Manor, 91, 90. ^ Quohog, 15. Schuyler, P., 223. Pillory, 472i. R. Scott, J. M,, 268, 269. Pinkney, P., 300. Railroads- Scribner, G, H,, 564. Pipes, — New York and Harlem, 0, 478. Scribner, J. W., 592. Indian, 15, 16. New York and Hudson, 6,479. Scnigham, W. W., 544. Plymonth Company, 2, 36. New York and Northern, 6, 481. Seabury, Rev. S., 303. Pocantico Kiver, 6. New Y'ork, New Haven, etc., 48". Sears, Q., 184, 304. Politics, 179, 482, 6G2, 75G. New Y'ork City and Northern, 481. Secor, F., 678. Political and (ieneral History, 1783 to 1860, 473. Rangers, 124. Senasqua, 12. Population, 522. Rasieres, Isaac de, 43. Serpentine, 7. Pork, 333. Reformation, 25, 27. Settlement of Westchester County, 20. Poe, E. A., 617. Regiments, 507. By Dutch, 22. Poe, E. A., House, 619. Keinfelder, M. I., 590. By English, 25. Pophani, family, 672. Relationsof County to Colony, 175. Shell Heaps, 12. Powder (see Mills). Religion (See Indian, Dutch, Stille). .Sheriff (see High Sheriff). Powell Post, 512.. Remonstrance, 2, 68, 73, 231. Sherifls, 6.53. Presentation, 93. Rensselaer, Van (See Von Rensselaer). Siege of Fort Independence, 753, Prime, S. I., 605. Rents, 83, 84, 94, 95, 124. SievaBean, 13, Primogeniture, 83. Restless, 21. Sing Sing, 519. Probationary Act, 4. Return of Volunteers, 506. Sint Sinks, 11. Protestant Patition, 104. Returning Officers, 238. Sisters of Charity, 760. Protestantism, 102. Revere, P., 191. Siwanoys, 11. Province, Origin of Word, 100. Revolution, 177. Skin-Scraper, Indian, 16. Provincial Congresses, Members, 048. Richardson, .Tohn, 18. Slavery, 29, 63, 64, 477, 487, 497, 659. Provincial Congress, — Ricbbell, Jno., Confirmation of, 146. Slevin, Rev. T. C, 73. First. Petition of, 149. Sloughter, 163. Call for, 2.jl. Indian Deeds to, 849. Smith, C, 500, Organization, 267. Burying-Place of, 861. Smith, J. M,, .56(). Mrnibersbip, 268. Ridgefield Angle, 5. Smith Family, 317. Organizing of Militia, 277. Ridings, 112. Smuggling, 181. Arrests, 286. Riots, 499. Socage (see Lands). Dissolution, 303. Rivington, J., 303. Societies, .\id, 504, Second. Riverdale, 759. Societies of White Plains, 739, Meeting, 318. Rivers, 521. .Society for Propagating Gospel, 175, 303, Organization, 320. Bronx, 5, 0, 519, 657, 658. of Mechanics in Union, 358, 359, Dis.solution, 337. Byram, 4, G. Soil, 521. Third. Croton, 5, 6. South Pond, 5. Organization, 338. Hudson, 5. South worth, E, D, E, N,, 639, Resolution as to Independence, 339. Hutchinson, 6. Spanish Settlements, 20, Committee on Dangers, .341. Maharness, 0. Spear-heads, Indian, 14, Resolutions as to Arrests, 343. Mamaroneck, 6. Spuyten Dnyvel, 517, 7.59. Resolutions as to Committee on Con- Neperhan, C, 68. Squanto, 39, spiracies, 349. Pocantico, 0. St, John's Church, 730. Resolutions as to Disarming, 353. Saw-Mill, 0, 68. St, Thomas' Church, 873, 874, Adoption of Resolutions of Continental Stamford Mill, 6. Stages, Early, 472. Congress as to Independence, 358. Roads, 473, 479, 082, 731. Stamford Mill River, 6. Answer to Virginia Resolutions as to Robertson, W. H., 530. Stamp Act Congress, 176. same, 360. Rochelle, 28. State of Grievance.*, 229, Resolutions as to same, 301. Roman Law, 42, 57, 65. States-General (see Dutch), Agreement as to Letter, Resolutions, Rushmore, Thomas L., 861. States Provincial (see Dutch). 302. Ryan, Rev. J., 72. Steamboats, Early, 470. Order as to Arms, 304 . Rye (See Baird), 521. Steatite, View of Drilled Piece of, 14. Elects Brigadier-General, 366. Conmiission at, 4. Steenrood,C., ,322. Disbanding, 367. Meeting, 205. Stewart, L, S,, 77, Fourth. Parish, 93, 99. Stewart Hart Post, 513. Meeting, etc., 371. Pond, 5. Stille, Opinion of Colonial Religion, 102, Resolution of Independence, 372. Territory, 29. Stockbridge Indians, 755, Direction to Sherifls, 374. Ryke's Patent, 123, 126. Stocks, 472h, Changes Name to "Convention," 375. S. Sachem, 10. Stone Weapons of Indians, 14, Arrests, 376, Stuyvesant, Gov, P,, 3, 24, 68, 76, War Measures, 381, 385. Salem, 350. Succotash, 13. Coumiittee on Government, 382. Sales, Indian, 18, 23, 24, 25, 34, 44, 49, 51, 07, Sugar Bill, 165. Provincial (Convention, 250, 647. 71, 718. Sumter, 491. Provisional Order, 69. Santen,161, 162. Sully, Thomas, 465. Provisions, 424. Saw-Mill River, 6, 119. Supervisors, 109, 645. Public Works, 478. Saybrook, 2. Supervisors, Signatures of, 474. INDEX. 893 Superintendents, 654. Supreme Court, G51. Sun-ender, Dutch, 76, 78. Surrogates, C52. Swift, S., .'>93. Swinburue, J., 605. T. Tables, 31. Tallmage, Benjnniiii, W. Tuuiniany, 485. Taiikitekes, 12. Tapijaii Bay, 5. Tarrytowu, 518. Taverus, 472i. Ta.xes, 474, 475. Tea, 182, 183, 341. Tea Sets, 459. Tecuiuseh, 35. Ten Broeck, A., 225. Tenure (see Laud), 79. Texas, 487. Thouias, 91. Thomas, J., 228, 266. Three Years' Volunteers, 493. Throckmorton, J., 25, 639. Throgg's Neck, 406. Tibbitt's Brook, 6. Tibbitt, G., 72. Tienhoven, C, 08, 69. Tilden, S. J., 554. Tilford, J. M., 742. Title, ludian, vesting of, 'ij. Tobacco, 9, i:). Todd, Ki v. J. A., 62.1. Toll Gathorur, 111. Topography, 5. Tompkins, D. D., 671. Totem, 10, 32. Townsend, M., 267. Township?, 115, 135, 136. Trade, 169. "Transport," 60, 51. Trapping, Indian, 12. Treason, 35.i, 356. Treasurers, 109, 654. Treaties, as to Boundaries between New York and Connecticut, 3. Travel, ;172. 681. Tremont Meeting, 500. Turner, Nathan, 25. Turneur, Daniel, 774. Two Years' Volunteers, 492. V. Union, American, Alison and De Tocqueville on, 1. V w. Waccabuck Lake, 5. Wagons, 30. Walloons, 22, 42, 45. Wampum, 15. War, Indian and Dutch, 19, 702, 770. Civil, 490. Dutch and Spanish, 21. of 1812, 605, 689. Revolutionary, 177, 664, 688,705,725,749. Ward, A., 487. Ward B. B\u-nett Post, 575. Wardens, 98. Wardrobes of 1776, 463. Washington, G., 384. Waterbury, 325. Weckquaesgeeks, 11, 745, 768. Weddings, Early, 472b. Wells, E., 552. Wells, James L., 843. Wentz, C. W., 5. W.e8tclie8ter Bay, 6. Chasseurs, 492. County of To-day, 516. Creek, 6. Town, 768. Town, Churches of, 809. Town ot To-day, 908. Town, Natural Characteristics of, 802. Town, Political History of, 801. Town since the Revolution, 908. West Farms, 836. West India Company (see Dutch). Wetmore, T., 209. White family, 962. White Plains, 714. Whittaker, F., 636. Wilkins, I., 231, 232,245,254, 601. William I., 80. William III., 4. William and Mary, 116. Williams, Isaiah T., 547. Williams' Bridge, 3'23. Winthrop, Governor J., 25, 76. Wood, J., 628. Working Men, 262. Woodhull, N., 227. Woodhull, Captain, 272. Wright, Green, 679. Y. Yonkers, 18, 23, 60, 517. Herald, 502. Y'ork, Duke of, 75, 78, 162. his Laws, 84. Young, J. W., 742. Van Bursum, 120. Van Cortlandt, A., 594. Van Cortlandt, K., 278. Van Cortlandt family, 761. Van Cortlandt Park, 68. Van Cortlandt, Philip, 276. Van Cortlandt, Pierre, 146. Van Cortlandt, S. (See Manor), 24, 113, 115, 118, 122, 127, 130. I Van Couwenhoven, J., 68, 69. Vander Donck, A , 23, 24, 66. Van der Huyghena, 68. Van Dincklagcn, 68. Van Elslaut, C, 771. Van Rensselaer, K., .50, 66. Van Rensselaer People, 89. Van Rensselaer, W. P., 553. Van Schelluyne, D., 66. Van Twiller, 2. Van Wyck, P. C, 594. Van Curler, Areudt, 66. Varian, W. A., 581. Verplanck, P., 124, 125, 131. his Map, 131, 133. his Survey, 134. Vestrymen, 98. Volunteers, 492, 493, 500. Von Renusselaer (see Van Rensselaer). I