No. 31. (£f)urcl) fit t&e Colonies. , - ■ AIT STEAL I A. i j _ _ I diocese of Melbourne. A LETTER FROM THE LORI) BISHOP OF MELBOURNE, TO THE SECRETARY OP THE 1 SOCIETY FOR THE PROPAGATION OF THE GOSPEL IN FOREIGN PARTS. Dated September 1 854 . I LONDON: PRINTED FOB THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROPAGATION OF THE GOSPEL; AND SOLD BY THE SOCIETY EOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE, GREAT QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN’S INN FIELDS; 4 , ROYAL EXCHANGE; 16 , HANOVER STREET, HANOVER SQUARE; AND RIVINGTONS, BELL & DALDY, HATCHARDS, AND ALL BOOKSELLERS. 1855. 3 . 55 . Price Fourpence / (Eiurcjj tn t fie ©olonus. No. XXXI; AUSTRALIA. DIOCESE OF MELBOURNE. A LETTER FROM THE LORD BISHOP OF MELBOURNE, TO THE SECRETARY OF THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROPAGATION OF THE GOSPEL IN FOREIGN PARTS. Dated September 1854 . LONDON: PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROPAGATION OF THE GOSPEL; AND SOLD BY THE SOCIETY EOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE, GREAT QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN’S INN FIELDS ; AND 4 , ROYAL EXCHANGE ; RIVINGTONS, BELL & DALDY, J3ATCHARDS, AND ALL BOOKSELLERS. 1855 . 3 . 55 . lONDON : K, CLAY, PRINTER, BREAD STREET HILL, gioxtsi of ‘gpmmtt. v . MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, Sept. 1, 1854. My dear Sir, I have often had occasion to apologise for my apparent neglect in not writing to you re¬ gularly and fully upon the affairs of the Church in this Diocese ; and I fear that my omissions herein have been regarded by some persons as indicating a want of due regard, or, I may perhaps say, due respect, for the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel. I would beg, however, through you, to assure the Committee and friends of the Society generally, that the brevity and irregularity of my correspondence have not been occasioned by any disposition on my part to depreciate the importance of the Society’s labours, or by any defect in affec¬ tion or esteem towards those by whom its affairs are ministered. The real and only causes have been my own natural want of facility in writing, and extreme dislike to treat a subject imperfectly, together with the large and increasing amount of local business, and a state of health, which, al¬ though sufficiently good to enable me to perform my ordinary duties without much difficulty, does not allow me to attempt more than a limited amount of daily work. It has been my wish for several years past to prepare an account of the progress of the Church 4 DIOCESE OF MELBOURNE. in this Diocese, which, if I could execute the task properly, would be not only interesting to all whose attention has been directed to the religious condi¬ tion of our Colonies, but likewise useful to such as may hereafter be called either to labour themselves, or to send forth others to labour, in any similar sphere. The causes above-mentioned have, how¬ ever, hitherto prevented me, and, although I am far from alleging them as a complete justification, I hope they may be received by my brethren, judging in the spirit of Christian charity, as an excuse for my delay. I will now apply myself, as the Lord shall give me time and strength, to the accomplishment of my proposed undertaking in the present, and probably one or more future letters, which I would request the Society, if it should deem expedient, to pub¬ lish entire. I would first give a brief sketch of the history of the Church in the Diocese since my arrival in Janu¬ ary 1848, which will show the ministerial arrange¬ ments which I have adopted, and the means which I - have used, for obtaining a recognised Ecclesiastical constitution, as also the measure of success which the Lord has granted unto me. It must always be one chief object of a colonial Bishop, and particularly in a new Diocese like this, the population of which is increasing by tens of thousands annually, to provide a constant supply of additional Clergymen, and at the same time to take care, that those whom he appoints to any ministerial charge shall be faithful and efficient servants of the INCREASE OF CLERGY. 5 Lord. At my arrival there were only three Clergy¬ men, of the Church of England employed in the duties of their sacred calling. Three accompanied me from England; one in the course of the same year joined me here, and I ordained four; so that at the end of the year 1848, the number was in¬ creased to . . .11 At the end of 1849 the number was 16 >) 1850 5? 20 >> 1851 24 >> 1852 JJ 24 >> 1853 JJ 30 At the time I am writing, Sept. 1, 1854, it is 34. There are also two additional Clergymen known by me to be on their way from England ; I am ex¬ pecting one from Yart Diemen’s Land; and there are three candidates for Orders, whom I hope to be able to ordain in the course of the present month. In perusing the above statement you cannot fail to be struck with there being no increase in the year 1852. This was occasioned by the death, or removal on account of failure of health, or other causes, of no less than six licensed Clergymen of the Diocese in that year. Nor does this statement fully represent our loss : for, within the preceding five months, we had lost three others. The circum¬ stance occasioned me very great mortification, for I was thereby not only prevented from extending the ministration of the Word and Sacraments to various districts in which they were both urgently needed and earnestly desired, but also compelled, in several cases, to disappoint expectations which I had myself 6 DIOCESE OF MELBOURNE. raised, and in some even to relinquish posts which the Church had previously occupied. Moreover, it was just at this time that the gold-fields were discovered, and the Colony, which was before rapidly ad¬ vancing in population and wealth, rose at once into a position, which, under ordinary circumstances, it could not have attained in less than half a century. Within twelve months the population was estimated to have more than doubled itself; and the wealth of the people was augmented in a much larger propor¬ tion. Nevertheless, I would acknowledge the Lord’s continued goodness to us, as shown in a variety of circumstances, which I cannot now enumerate, but which then assured me that He was chastening us “for our profit,” and that He would not withdraw His loving-kindness from us. Accordingly you will observe, that in the course of the following year, 1853, He graciously increased the number of my fellow-labourers to thirty-one ; and I hope that, be¬ fore the close of the present year, it will exceed forty. The real condition of a Church depends, however, not merely upon the number, but still more upon the faithfulness, ability, and earnest persevering diligence of its Ministers ; and upon this point I am thankful to be able to testify to the great goodness of the Lord our God towards us. Of course, a body of thirty-five Clergymen must exhibit various degrees of intellectual power and culture, and also of spiri¬ tual gifts and Christian devotedness ; but, without pledging myself for every individual, I can say with confidence, that the Clergy of this Diocese are cha¬ racterised by their soundness of doctrine, their per¬ sonal piety, and their zealous attention to the duties DOCTRINAL LATITUDE. t of their high and holy calling; and that they are very valuable fellow-helpers to me in the Lord. To the complaint, which has been sometimes made against me, that I do not admit into my Dio¬ cese any Clergyman, however faithful and earnest, who differs from me upon those points on which the Church allows a certain latitude to her members, I would reply by a distinct and positive denial of the fact. I have no desire to narrow the terms of our communion, nor to exclude from ministerial em¬ ployment, any who can furnish me with satisfactory evidence that their character and conduct in the Ministry has been consistent with their ordination vows; and that they possess the necessary qualifica¬ tions, physical and intellectual, for the service of their Lord in such a country as this. I believe that several of the Clergy now in this Diocese, whom I highly esteem and love for their works’ sake, differ from me, more or less upon Baptismal Degeneration, and other questions, about which there has been so much controversy in the Church : but I trust that they all hold, and all preach, the fundamental truths of the Gospel, which are stated in the sixth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, and twelfth “ Articles of Religion and that they do faithfully and earnestly, “ instruct the people committed to their charge out of the Scriptures.” My commissaries know my senti¬ ments upon this point; and I have no reason to suppose that they have ever acted, or that they would ever be at all inclined to act, at variance with them. I thank them, however, that they have never sent, and I have a good confidence that they 8 DIOCESE OF MELBOURNE. never will send, any one who makes the “ kingdom of God ” to consist in forms and ceremonies, instead of in “righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost,” or who teaches “for doctrines the command¬ ments of men,” or who strives “ about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers.” From all such may the Lord graciously preserve His Church, both in this Diocese and in our Fatherland ! In connexion w T ith the measure of success which the Lord has bestowed upon us, in providing faithful and able Clergymen for the ministry of the Word and Sacraments, I would mention the progress which He has enabled us to make in portioning out the Diocese, according to the Ecclesiastical system of our Father- land, into Parishes and Archdeaconries. The main¬ tenance of the Parochial, in contrast with the Congregational system, is, in my opinion, essential to the success of the great object which we ought always to keep in view, of bringing the whole people under effective pastoral superintendence; and all our Colonial Bishops have, I believe, adopted the prac¬ tice of dividing their Dioceses, as circumstances permitted, into distinct parishes. There are, how¬ ever, several causes which have occasioned, in my own case, great delay and difficulty in carrying out this system. Upon my arrival, the three Clergymen then officiating in the Diocese were so far removed from one another, that it was quite impossible, as it was quite unnecessary, to define the limits of their respective ministrations. As, however, their number increased, so that they were brought into closer proximity to each other, I was able to fix the rela- PARISHES AND ARCHDEACONRIES. 9 tive boundaries of a few Parochial Districts, leaving them still indefinite in extent in those directions in which there were no neighbouring Clergymen. These Districts have gradually become multiplied, and now there are in Melbourne some which may be properly termed parishes. But there is another cause, besides the distance which so often separates the Parochial Clergy from one another, viz., the great proportion of young and inexperienced Minis¬ ters, which has compelled me, in many instances, to delay the formation of new parishes. For when I am obliged, as often happens, to place a young man in charge of a district which is locally distinct from any other, instead of making it an independent cure, I prefer to regard it as an outlying portion of the nearest parish. Thus at the present time, not only the whole town and suburbs of Geelong, but also all the surrounding country districts, are comprehended in one parish, because the Clergymen appointed to the charge of these districts are young men in deacon’s Orders, who have not sufficient ex¬ perience to be placed in an independent charge. This is an evil which I hope every succeeding year, through their growth in age and spiritual industry, and through the addition of others to the staff, we shall see rapidly diminishing. Besides the gradual formation of distinct Parishes, each under the charge of its own responsible minister, I have been anxious from the first to divide the Diocese into Archdeaconries, which might be placed under the superintendence of men qualified by their wisdom and experience to exercise 10 DIOCESE OF MELBOURNE. an influence over their brethren, and also by their zeal and activity to promote the extension of the Church in the particular district committed to their over¬ sight. Thus in October, 1848, I constituted the Archdeaconry of Geelong, to which I appointed the Rev. H. B. Macartney, D.D. In November, 1851* I constituted that of Melbourne, and appointed to it the Rev. T. Hart Davies, M.A., who had been designated to this office by my commissaries in England. At the same time, however, the Arch¬ deaconry of Geelong became vacant, through the appointment of Dr. Macartney to the office of Dean of Melbourne, and I had no one whom I could ap¬ point as his successor. The failure of Archdeacon Davies’ health also compelled him, in the course of the following year, to return to England, and thus his office also became vacant, and in 1852 I was again left, as at the first, without an Archdeacon. I mention the circumstance as showing the great vicissitudes, and peculiar difficulties consequent upon them, to which a Colonial Bishop, especially in a newly formed Diocese, is exposed. I am thankful to be able to add, that I have this year appointed the Rev. T. C. B. Stretch to the Arch¬ deaconry of Geelong, and have also constituted an Archdeaconry of Portland, to which I have ap- pointed the Rev. T. H. Braim, Minister of Belfast. The Archdeaconry of Melbourne, however, still con¬ tinues vacant. The office of Archdeacon in a new Colonial Dio¬ cese is one of very great practical importance, for his duty is to keep a constant oversight of the ARCHDEACONRY FOR THE GOLD-FIELDS. 11 district under his jurisdiction ; to obtain information concerning, and if possible, personally inspect any new villages which are forming; to observe the en¬ largement which is taking place in the towns; to ascertain where Churches or Schools are wanted, and where additional Clergymen or Lay-readers should be placed; and to suggest to the Bishop, or the people, as the case may be, such -steps as may be necessary for carrying out his plans of Church extension. It is therefore a cause of much thank¬ fulness, that both Mr. Stretch and Dr. Braim are men in whose singleness of purpose, energy and judgment, I can place entire confidence; but I am disappointed, that I have not yet been able to obtain such a one as is required for the Archdeaconry of Melbourne. I am also very desirous to constitute an Archdeaconry for a portion of the interior, to comprehend the principal gold-fields; but I have not yet determined from what place he should de¬ rive his title. If the Lord should provide a person qualified for the office, I would at once make the necessary arrangements; but until I can obtain the man, it is of no use to take any steps in the matter. The subjoined tabular statement, showing the counties, towns, and villages, with resident minis¬ ters, parishes, and clergymen, in the several Arch¬ deaconries, conveys to those who have the oppor¬ tunity of consulting the map recently published by Arrowsmith, or any other good map of Victoria, a much clearer idea of the ministerial arrangements of the Diocese, than any description which I could give of them. w PQ <1 W H PS 1= w A «! to 'A W PS a & o >5 W w to M PS < PH sg % a p p 3 w .. PS w CO W H % x 2 S ^ H fc p o u S* PS !«5 O y *4 W P a y PS P CD rO P ZJ P P P CD rQ 2 < S CD P ^ ^ p p CD Jh O h3 O CD .P H .5 '3 M c3 pq pq W > OS Pi > > > > pq pi pi pi s Pn q te d za d CD rO a A CS O a c A l-H o . „ be a c as ..-I PS 71 d d pq p J « t-5 7. c a o * ^ • CD H m p p CD J-i P a u p o d p S t—i p ^ p S-i os O PH ^ M c3 H P p OS bn c C as •p -2 tS P u S6 o f-J rp 1 CD be -P 3 J-S § n P-i CD ^ rO P £ CD £ rO g | ~ § e ^ d P ai h pq P P P a O O O d CD 'd PI P r-I CD Ph O O o £ P CD rP a o p bo .5 jo g H5 ?> >>>>>>>>>>>> 02 02 02 02 -i-> -pi -4-i CO 02 . JO CO • • d t>> dS • .-a o .a ^ ^ p . H sc P o jO ^ Jh U W K W Ph ? • be os ’■— Sso JS X3 ^ ‘C as tS ^ d -d P H d as d o -43 as d £►. w g 2 M rt g ^ fc d H S> A PS o n p w fs •O C/} S o > D ° c ^ ca 'd P £ P 5 P^H -*-» CO P O O P d o p Kilmore TOWNS OR DISTRICTS ARCHDEACONRIES. COUNTIES. WHERE CLERGYMEN PARISHES. INCUMBENTS t« A H <• Ph A U Pi o Q H H pa a G o G o cd o 3 cd rG o CD ~ f—H •C G So CD - y-< j-h o o G G • rH fcD r* ■*-» 03 *CJ .e 0) O c 3 ^ *H * rH F*H GO Op u ■£ S <0 rH G o CD o 3 CD nd rG CD '-H <1 «W o Xfl ^ «g ' 4> ,0 * o 3 _ • C/3 CD d Sou c d > >' > d) » ® 4) a *h G O ?H o 3 r—H o o-“« 3|;s CD ^ CD •d o -*-» -*-> • r—H d g~ o -+-> N o fH o Ph d CD C/3 <-* r-! c S g 0) 3 pj .2 « cj I—H G 2 -I '■ HH G aj .. o >.>,£3 ~ g 1 " 1 2 « « *-■3 £, o 3 . Hpd a ►> r*’ CD CD CD pdedPS g CD a CD G d G r2 -*-* Jh o Ph «w o G o CD o 3 CD d rG CD g - CD s-s G a 2 ^ § 2 CD s G 1 -* OD 2 03 d > CD c 3 PP g CD > •i—< _j a5 o3 Ph • CD . CD • . g P-i Ph o . . s ^ > H (U 0 Ph Ph V & -D S £3 d o >° P 3 £3 aj 3 .. s a £» £3 o 1—1 bn - CD C »h c3 O CD > > 0) a> Pi P4 ^5 o >H O H « O ..2 ^ o3 rVr—t O ^ f-j +-• • r C* ^ — CD r *“< § 35 ^05-3 O "~* o3 ^ o3 ^ 'CD G O F—H a) cu C3 C « cj fci g m > o *rH ° PP |g B g ^ G d cd £3 O rt cfl ^ T3 p< s 3« Oj r-H Tj Pb rH « a Eh cq uT < H o 3 t3 W o g £ £ £ ►H Hj tH pi !? § Ph W W CD 1 G ' § G G CO rh o co co r-H f—i • ^ rh — CO 8«? »o CO lo CO * ~ O ^ • >H — ^ . * o^fG