MASTER NEGATIVE NO. 91-80356-11 MICROFE.MED 1991 COLUMBIA UNTV' ERSITY LIBRARIES, > t. i 'f * YORK (( as part of tlic Foundations Vi e^ieni Ci\ ilizatioii Preservation Project Funded bv the NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITffiS Reproductions iiia\- not be made without peiinii-ioii from Coiumbia Universih' Ldbrafv COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The copyright law of llic United States -- Title 17, United States Code -- coiicenis the making of photocopie- o^ other reproductiiMi . ' .rnivrighted material.. Columbia University Librarv reserves the right to refuse to accept a copy order if, in its judgement, fulfillment of ihe order vsould ii]\(Vi\e "Hiliifion of the copyright law. A U T H O R • TITLE: LETTER TO THE LORD JOHN RUSSELL... PLA CE : LONDON DA TE : 1820 « ' COLUMBIA UNI\7FRSITY LIBRARIES PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT BIBLIOCT? A III f * t I ii :\ IC liOFORMTARGET Master Negative # Original Material as Filmed - Existing Bibliographic Record Restrictions on Use: 'M4 24 Letter to Lord John Russell on French affairs. London 1820. 0. 54p* looir.i) No. 10 of a vol. of pamphlets TECHNICAL MICROFORM DATA FILM SIZE: --0_jri>v\__ IMACilil'l.AC i^Mi^NT: lA @ IB IIB DATE i H M i I V __/^Z^ /o,^<37 INITIALS '■'"■ Ki^bhARCH PUBLICATIONS. INC WOODBRIDGE. C:Y REDUCTION RATIO: /_Akr_ \ 4 U" Association for information and Image IManagement 1100 Wayne Avenue, Suite 1100 ' Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301/587-8202 Centimeter 1 2 3 tlM 4 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiili 111 7 8 9 10 liiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiili 11 12 13 ullllljllllllllljl 14 15 mm wm TTT TTT ITT Inches 1.0 I.I 1.25 1 4.5 15.0 2.8 1^ 1^ Jf 1^ rnta 4.0 ■Kbb. 1.4 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 If!! MfiNUFflCTURED TO flllM STflNDflRDS BY RPPLIED IMAGE, INC. U \ o 1^: 'I n III »rf^ A LETTER TO LORD JOHN RUSSELL, \ I ^•c. ■It ni fM |t\^* / $ \ ' - f I I 1l II ( LETTER I™ TO LORD JOHN RUSSELL, ON FRENCH AFFAIRS. M LONDON : (^^ JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET. 1820. !f(''i||ti i .0 ■^■■ Hi # .r A JLi Jci 1 1 jji JUj -J ^c. LONDON : JMntod Dy W. Clow t», Northambertind-CQiut. IN the Letter your Lordship published last spring, you truly stated, '' That after having been, for twenty-five years, occupied with foreign politics, we have entirely lost sight of the subject. The extra- ordinary situation in which the government of France is placed, and the violence of the conflicting parties, have at length aroused the most apathetic, and the people of this country begin to be aware that the repose and security of Europe depend in no small degree on the issue of the present contest. Much credit is due to you for having turned the public attention to the subject, and it is because our eyes ar^ at length opening, that I take the liberty of address- ing you this letter. I am also anxious to make some observations upon your own pamphlet, as your opinion, always respectable from your rank, charac- '■ ' ' 1 ii \\\ III lUWkl '1^1 ter, and talents, derives in this instance additional weight, from being (as it is believed), those of that party to which, without a compliment, your Lord- ship has added so much lustre. Although much difference of opinion exists as to the cause, none remains in the mind of any one, of the extremely critical situation in which the Bour- bons are placed. In acknowledging last year, that " there was no aristocracy in France, or means of forming one ;" in stating that " the love of equality was the distinguishing political passion of a French- man;" " that title and birth were actually nothiiig in the eyes of the people ;" you seemed not to be wholly blind to those dangers which have increased with fearful rapidity ; for it would ill become me to imagine that one of the House of Russell could con- sider these points as favourable *' to the progress of liberty." Still it was impossible to believe, that you really felt much apprehension when you risked the following prophecy. " In the mean time it is very gratifying to observe ** the progress which the cause of real liberty is ** making in that kingdom. Under the present " ministry we may expect that the laws still wanting * " to form a free constitution will be passed. That 3 '* some metliod will be found of preventing the inde- " finite and vexatious imprisonment which now takes ** place before a prisoner is brought to trial. That a '' man falsely imprisoned will be allowed an easy " way of obtaining redress. That persons in autho- " rity may be henceforward accused, without the " permission of the council of state. That the " freedom of the press will be granted to the daily " papers, and trial by jury allowed in cases of libel. " That juries themselves will be no longer chosen by " the prefects. These and other regulations are required to ** complete a system of personal and political liberty. ** But there is no reason to fear that they will be long " delayed." It is curious that the minister of which this was foretold, should have left, as the last record of his administration, the proposal of an establishment of a censorship for five years, and what is equivalent to the suspension of our Habeas Corpus act. I do not deny these measures may be necessary ; I only remark the circumstance, as a proof that the habit acquired by your party of false prophecy has not been confined to this country alone. The career of that minister has been a singular A 2 " If! I 1 $ I '' ' i one. He came into power by being the avowed sup- porter of the law of elections, which his last act was an attempt to change; his first charge against the royalist government was that they had increased the number of the deputies of that chamber, which his last act was an attempt also to increase. He was the child and the champion of that law which, to use your Lordship's expression, " seemed framed ** expressly to put power in the hands of those who '* took part in the Revolution." His subsequent actions were in unison; for, with equal zeal and activity, he persevered in effecting, it is to be feared, nearly a total change in all civil and military offices ; in replacing those who were least favourable to the Bourbons ; and in recalling, if not restoring to rank and honours, all their most tried and inveterate ene- mies*. ,1' ♦ If the late minister had wished that the just punishment of Ney's treachery should deserve the name of judicial murder, which the jacobinb all over Europe have chosen to atlix to it, he could not have taken a belter mode than by advising his mis- guided sovereign to recall and restore to favour those men who had, in proportion to their means, shewed the same hostility to him, and who emulated, if they could not rival, that illustrious victim. Will any one be bold enough to assert that the Prince of Moscow a, if alive, would not now be standing as a marshal ot France in the presence of his sovereign ? Alarmed at length at the formidable power and menacing appearance of the machine he had put in motion, and at the gigantic strides with which the revolutionary spirit was spreading over France ; aware, but too late, that the maintenance of that law of elections, to which he owed his power, was wholly incompatible with the existence of that monarchy, of which, by his office, he was the supporter, and that they were just verging to an uncontrolled de- mocracy, he determined on making an effort to remedy the evil of which he had been the artificer. As his law was not carried into execution, it is not necessary to enter into the details of his project, but the most important part was, the preservation of the chamber, without any partial dissolution, for five years ; an increase of the number of deputies, and some salutary alterations as to the patentes^ It would be now equally superfluous to examine whether the royalists * have acted wisely at such a cri- tical momentji n refusing to support measures because they could not place confidence in the man — but it may * The more moderate royalists, under Villcte and Laine, seemed willing to support him; but the violent ultras seemed to forget their country in their hatred of the minister. m:} b I> i I ^skS \^ '\0'! .It be feared that the fury of parly hatred which now guides the poUtics of France, will more than any thing conduce to the overthrow of that government. The minister felt that the fate was approaching him, ofall those who, vacillating between conflicting parties, partake of the violence and incur the hatred of both, without gaining the confidence of either ; and there is every reason to believe that nearly two months ago he guarded against the disgrace attending the fall of a favourite, by being privately made a duke, and by being proposed as embassador to this country. He, however, appears to have determined on bringing forward the alteration of the law of election, which he had at length discovered to be indispensable. In this interval an atrocious murder is committed on the per- son of that prince, whom (exclusive of some personal failings) he and his party had contributed to render as unpopular, as he had unfortunatly become. A public and formal accusation of the most extraordinary nature is brought forward against him. What is the con- duct of this '* liberal" minister your Lordship eulogizes? Did he adopt the measure which the ** anti-liberal" government of this country has recourse to, of ex- amining into the causes of that foul crime which had plunged the Royal Family in mourning, and its friends in consternation and in grief? Did he wait till he could deliberately trace the extent of its connexion with the revolutionary spirit, which he found at length used daggers as well as spoke them ? Did he remain even long enough to vindicate himself from public ac- cusation, and to fall at least with dignity and honour? convinced as he had become of the necessity of altering the election law, did he seek out any conciliating means to render it more palatable ? None of all this ; pour dorer la inlule, he brought forward with all the rash precipitation of fear, two measures, which however necessary they may be, should never have been proposed in such a hasty, imprudent, and un- statesmanlike manner ; and then, leaving his sovereign in a situation not to be viewed without equal pity and alarm, he resigned the situation of a minister; but not the power with which he had received it, for, by the effect of his own acts it had passed away. Happy would it be for Europe, if he could have re- stored it with the civil and military organization in the same state in which he had found it. It is difficult to speculate on the future, or to say how far the Due de Richelfeu possesses the nerve and decision neces- sary to meet so critical a position of affairs, entangled as he is by the toils which two years of unremitting b\ I I > i 4\ ?i i\l i\y %\ VJ / MtfMtoliHH MHla activity has spread over every department ; vvitli those whom he had banished standing, beside him in the council-chamber of his sovereign ; * with an army and a civil administration re- organized, and filled not with his friends or the real supporters of the monarchy ; with a chamber of peers the source of which has been polluted, the power of which has been annihilated ; and with a le- gislative body which by the influence of his predecessor at first, and by the spirit of the times at last, is fast approaching to a state which, to use the mildest com- parison, would be more suited to thirty years ago, than to be wished for at the present moment. With respect to the death of that Prince which has spread consternation through every loyal part of France, it may, in one point of view, strengthen the Bourbon cause, if it should serve to unite, which earnestly is to be hoped, its different branches into an active and cordial co-operation, for the support of that ancient and illustrious throne, of which one is the possessor and to which the other is the heir. I wish to look a little more in detail into the internal policy of the late government. * Much may, however, be hoped from ihe character and exertions of the present minister at war, the late ambassador here ; but it is an Augean stable — wc heartily wish him success. 9 I am aware that this subject is equally difficult and delicate, and I should not have ventured to submit these hasty observations to the public, if I did not feel it to be the imperative duty of every one, how- ever humble his abilil:ies, to assist in the diffusion of truth, on a subject which, from the undue influence excited by the late French minister over the daily press, has been so much misrepresented, — and in which Europe, as well as this country, is vitally con- cerned. Let us then examine shortly what has been the conduct of her Government, and let us see, whether the* system pursued for two years, has been such as to justify the encomiums which are lavished on it by your Lord- ship, — and under which party the rational liberty of France, and the repose of Europe are most likely to be preserved. There may exist a difference of opinion, whether the French people are at this moment qualified to possess a representative government; whether there exists among them that knowledge of the principles on which real liberty is founded, or that character of moderation; judgment, and steady perseverance which are necessary to the attainment of that great work, a finished constitution. There are many who Mi . 'I I 10 know that couhtry well who are disposed to doubt it ; and from the political character which is given them by Madame de Stael, none more than that cele- brated writer; There are many who have remarked, in the whole course of their judicial proceedings, in their debates, and their political writings, — the most extraordinary ignorance of the most simple principles of justice, of the most common rules of evidence, of the most ordinary and acknowledged maxims of law : w^ho have observed that the party in power only views the representative system as the temporary means of carrying through their own objects, and as the con- venient instrument of their own power, instead of a check upon the executive authority, or as a tribunal to which they were responsible ; they have seen, in numerous cases, whenever a point is to be carried, the ministry never stop to inquire whether it may not be in violation of their charter ; and the opposition content themselves with complaining of the measure as a grievance which affects themselves, but never op- pose it on constitutional grounds or as an infraction of great fundamental principles. Your Lordship, how- ever, considers tliem in a more favourable point of view. You represent them to be as '^ eager to possess a free constitution as they were lately enthusiastic for 11 military glory and foreign dominion." You express your gratification at the " progress that the cause of real liberty is making through the kingdom ; and confidently expect that, under the present ministers, the laws still wanting to form a free constitution will not long be delayed." You do not leave us in doubt as to what sort of government you conceive is best suited to France, and to which they are now ap- proaching, for the amendments you anticipate are among the most important safeguards of our own liberties. As your views then for the future are for a still nearer approximation to the English constitu- tion, it is but fair to infer that '' the progress of real liberty,'^ which you describe, has been founded on the sound principles which guided the illustrious band of old Whigs, and which, as it is asserted by them, con- stitute the creed of the modern ones. Your Lordship has divided France into two parties, " those who love the Revolution, and those " who hate it ; those who wish to improve the " charter^ and those who wish it never had been " granted." I am willing to adopt the first part of this classification, and I wish to examine how far the latter is confirmed by facts ; which of these two parties ? 51 I 1 t 1.^ i ' « ^^ v ' ■il i -; * f i' 12 have pursued the most constitutional objects ; and whether the alterations and improvements which tlie late ministry (those who love the Revolution) have made in their charter are precisely of that nature as to entitle them to the approbation of the Whigs of this, or the friends of rational liberty, of social order, or of peace in any other country. Among the principles which led to the establish- ment of our liberties are — That the king has no dispensing power. That no act of any one branch of the legislature can have the force of law; and that if any act was passed, contrary to the most express stipulation of an original charter, and destructive of all security of per- and property, that the ministry who carried it through, should be impeached. What have ever been the objects of the Whigs ? A diminution of the influence of the crown in elections, and a fair representation of the people. These are not principles adapted only to our own country, or which can flourish only in our favoured clime, but they constitute the very essence of a representative government. The fitness of the French nation at tliis moment to enjoy a free constitution may. I repeat. 13 be doubted; but if your Lordship is right, they must be guided by these principles and no others. Let us see what have been their acts — 1. A constant exercise of the dispensing power, the annihilation of the constitutional power of one branch of the legislature. 2. The creation of the means of influencing the re presentation of the people. 3. The recall of the regicides, contrary to the ex- press and repeated resolutions of the whole legislature. 4. The re\^al of the law of conscription, contrary to the charter and the solemn promise of the King. If we examine these aets in detail, we shall find the violation of every principle on which liberty can be founded, or the balance of a constitutional govern- ment maintained- The first was proved by the creation of the sixty new peers. By the original charter of 1814, the king was em- powered to make peers for life. By an ordonnance of the 19th of August, 1815, this was revoked, and the peerage was made hereditary. By an ordonnance of the 25th of August, 1817, this was confirmed, and the formation of a majorat was directed to be esta- blished. After the preamble has stated the import- m I J i 111; i^ 14 ance of keeping up the dignity of the members of the first body in the state, the ordonnance states that no one hereafter can be called to the peerage who has not, previous to his nomination, obtained the royal permission to establish their majorat, and if he is not in possession of the same. This ordonnance passed through the chamber of deputies by a majority of 119 to 85, and the peers ; and became a law as binding as the charter itself until constitutionally repealed. Afterwards an ordonnance was issued, unsanctioned by either hon$e, dispensing with this law, and creating sixty new peers, of whom none had established the required majorat, and few of whom have the means of ever possessing it. This act was unconstitutional and illegal in every way. Several of these had forfeited their rank from their conduct during the Cent jours, and the ordonnance which dismissed them in July, 1815, was received with the acclamations of both houses. I will not enter into the past life, the private history, or the characters of the individuals thus created, although, if the opinion of Madame deStael is as true as I be- lieve it to be, " that none of those who participated in the crimes of tlie Revolution can be useful to France," I should have reason to doubt the degree of 15 benefit that she will derive from this addition to her peerage. The point I rest on is this, that the king could not by a simple ordonnance repeal a law of the whole legislature ; that in making peers who had no majorats nor means of forming them, without which they could not be made hereditary, he was, in fact, making peers for life, from which by law he was pre- cluded. 2. The law of elections. By the original charter the number of deputies was fixed at 262. On the king's return in 1815, an ordonnance was issued on the 13th of July, in which, after recapitulating the evils which had arisen from the imperfect representa- tion, and the advantages which would result from one " more numerous and less restrained in the conditions of eligibility,*' the number was increased to S95, It is clear that the very essence of a representative government is, that neither the sovereign nor any one branch can have the power of increasing or diminish- ing the representation at pleasure : we see indeed these principles recognised by the ordonnance itself*; and * The words of the ordonnance that follow are these : — Mais voulant cependant que dans aucun cas aucune modification de la Charte ne puisse devinir definitive que d'apr^s les formes constitu- s \rm f\ •• IG this act of the king can only be excused by the critical situation in which he was placed at the tenninatiou ot a second revolution. This measure which, like the assemblincr of our convention in 1688, has necessity for its excuse, should have received, as in our case, the sanction of law by an act of the whole parlia- ment. The supporters of this measure argued, that sufficient power is vested in the king by the 14th arti- cle of the charter to sanction it. Without enterins into this question, it is clear that if it was illegal, the acts of that chamber were illegal likewise. On the 5th of September that chamber was dissolved, the * ministry was changed, and the late government came into power, for the favorite was the real mi- nister. Were the acts of the former chamber declared illegal? was the constitutional principle re- cognised by the former ordonnance, acted upon by these more enlightened legislators ? On the contrary ! tionnellcs, les dispositions de la presente ordonnance seront Ic pre- mier objet des deliberations des Cbambres. Le pouvoir Icgislatif dans son ensemble statuera siulaloi des Elections, sur les changc- mens a faire h. la Chaite, changemens dont nous ne prenons ici j'iniliative que dans les points les plus indispensables et les plus ur- gens, en mm imposant meme I'obHgation de nous rapprocher au- ant que possible de la Charte, et des formes pr^cedemment e« 17 they immediately practised what they had blamed in their predecessors, by altering the law of elections by an ordonnance also. Your Lordship states, that those who love the revolution (always meaning the late mi- nistry) wish to improve the charter. Let us look at the preamble of the first act of this reforming admi- nistration ; of this act which, you say, saved France from a civil war * :—' Depuis notre retour dans nos ^tats chaque jour nous a d^monti*^ cette v^rite pro clamee par nous dans nne occasion solemnelle, qu"^ c6t6 de ravantage damtliorer est le danger d'innover, et nous avons en cons(^quence juge necessaire de usase. * I must ask the noble lord, what appearance of civil war there was at that moment, and whether the presence of 150,000 foreigners, who were supposed by their enemies to be waiting anxiously for a pretext to interfere, was a propitious circumstance. Under what grievance did one party labour, and what oppression €ace-otTering to France for all she had suffered, and would it not make every Frenchman rally round the throne to support the aggression ? The character, however, of her people is not altered,— whatever temporary ex- haustion or lassitude may restrain them, the main national princi- ple, whether under a Buonaparte or a Bourbon, is military glory and an extension of the empire. Is it probable that these feelings arc weakened by their losses, and their late humiliations—are they not, on the contrary, more likely to be inflamed by wounded pride and animated by revenge ? Where then is the security, that this very year Belgium does not again fall into the hands of France ? 1 will not prophesy that this will happen, but I maintain that we had no right to lay such a tempting bait within her reach ; we were not justified in trying so hazardous an experiment as the power of her self-denial ; for to place a kingdom within the grasp of dormant ambition is like putting a penitent drunkard in your wine-cellar, or a domesticated fox in your poultry-yard. I do not say this m hostility to France. I wish to sec her employed in cultivating her own goodly fields instead of ravaging the harvests of others,-! wish to see her reforming the morals, and ameliorating the situa- tion of her own people, instead of spreading principles more pernicious than her sword into the heart of her neighbours ; and if I could believe that the evacuation of France was consistent with the security of Europe, I should rejoice in it for her sake. lowed of course. Europe had a right then to have in- terfered, and she had the means of clieckinir the evil in its bud. I trust that she will not have bitter cause to lament that the opportunity has passed away; and that she may not be compelled with all the efforts of her strength to eradicate the evil she might have remedied by a word. If such is the state to which France has been brought, by a series of measures which have lona spread alarm in the minds of those who have watched the career of the French Government, it becomes necessary to say a few words on the question of interference ; for your Lordship states, '' that we are bound to interfere in the internal concerns of every state of Europe ; that meetings of the sovereigns are to be held at intervals, in order to watch over the security of those transactions upon which the peace is founded and consolidated ; and that, should anv of the provinces which have fallen under the sway of legitimate monarchs attempt * to improve the form of The noble Lord admits the spirit of the times is such, that no war could be carried on in Europe without becoming revolutionary. Has there ever existed any conspiracy, from Wat Tyler to the murder of our ministers, which was not declared to be a revolt against the abuses of power? And if we were to be c 2 s Thich have "o^ »>«"«"•■ •ible to any other writer. The Memoir, respecting the conferences in the Isle of Elba which induced Napoleon to return to France, has been perused by the Emperor ; he admitted that it contained " the truth, and nothing but the trnlh ;" and declared to M. Fleury, that he approved of it. publication, though at first he was inclined to retain it for the purpo,. of inLrtion in the Memoir, of hi. Life, which he himself is writing. The knowledge of the facts stated in thi. Memoir, has hitherto b«ei. cuntine«l to the parties unmed.ately concerned in the transactioo.-In order to disconcert the intrigues of louche. (Duke of Otranto,) M. Fleury was employed by Napoteon to meet the secret agent despatched by Prince Mcttemich to B^ale. at the period when the allied Sovereigns were not «"- ^e! .now of the abdication of Napoleon L in favour of the K.ng of Rome. The ^-^ta.l g.ven by M. Fleury explain the machinations of Fouche, and his views with respect to the go- *;mmeut of Napoleon.-In bis narrative of the battle of Waterloo, M. Heury ha. ind.- cated the reasons which led Napoleon U> «.p.rate himself from his army. All the pre- clZz accounts of the abdication of Napoleon have misrepresented the circumstance, wh ch a^^it :-And an attempt has been made by M. Fleury to place this event in its tie Lht He now offers to the world a detailed and accurate history of the conduct pur. .ued by the provisional government, by whose orders Napoleon was detained as a fruoner atmimlon; althongh it has l>een hitherto stated, that he lingered there m the hope of tirra ic^ by the army. And he developes the negotiations between the French go- ^ nment and Zord Wellington, and the other commander, of the allied armies, wh.c ultimTly led to the capitulation of Paris ; this portion of the narrative being illustrated by many document, which have hitherto remained inedited. The WORKS of MARY BRUNTON, containing Memoirs of HER Life, Emmeline, Self Control, and DisciruNE. M'ith a Portrait. 7 Vols, post 8vo. 2/. 18«. 6d. The WORKS of LORD BYRON. A New and uniform Edition, ▼ery handsomely printed in % Vols. 8vo. 11. 2f. The POETICAL WORKS of Sir WALTER SCOTT, Bart. Now first collected. Printed tiniformly and handsomely, with a Portrait of Ww Xutlior, in 12 Vols, foolscap 8vo. 3/. 12*. +• % ALBEMARLE-STREET, LONDON, April, 1820. Mr. MURRAY HAS THE FOLLOWING WORKS IN THE PRESS. The PERSONAL HISTORY of KING GEORGE the THIRD, undertaken with the assistance of, and in communication with, Persons officially connected with the late King, and Dedicated, by express Permission, to His present Majesty. By Edward Hawke Locker, Esq. F.R.S. With Portraits, facsimiles, and other Engravings. In one handsome volume 4to. RICCIARDA, Tragedia, di Uco Foscolo. Svo. NARRATIVE of the OPERATIONS and RECENT DISCO- VERIES within the PYRAMIDS, TEMPLES, TOMBS, and EXCA- VATIONS, in EGYPT and NUBIA ; and of a Journey to the Coast of the Red Sea, in search of the ancient Berenice, and another to the Oasis of Jupiter Ammon. By G, Belzoni. Accompanied by Plates, Plans, Views, ^c, of the newly discovered Places, ^c. 4to. ADVICE to JULIA, ^c. fc. Svo. J'ai vu les moeurs de mon tems ; et j'ai 6crit cette lettre. TRAVELS through HOLLAND, GERMANY, and Part of FRANCE, in 1819, with particular reference to their STATISTICS, AGRICULTURE, and MANUFACTURES. By W. Jacob, Esq! F.R.S. 4to. JOURNALS of TWO EXPEDITIONS behind the BLUE MOUNTAINS, and into the interior of NEW SOUTH WALES, undertaken by order of the British Government in the Year* 1817-18. By J(»HN Oxley, Esq., Surveyor-General of the Territory and Lieu- tenant of the Royal Navy. With Maps and Views of the Interior, or newly -discovered Country. 4to. TRAVELS, in 1816 and 1817, through NUBIA, PALESTINE, and SYRIA, in a Series of familiar Letters to his Relations, written on the Spot, by Capt. Mangles, R.N. 2 vols. Svo. The TOPOGRAPHY of ATHENS, with some Remarks on its Antiquities. By Lieut.-Col. Leake, 8vo. The PLAYS and POEMS of JAMES SHIRLEY, now first collected and chronologically arranged, and the Text carefully collated and restored. With occasional Notes, and a Biographical and Critical F^say. By William Gifford, Esq., uniformly with Massincer and Ben Jonson. G vols. 8vo. Out- hundred copies are printing in royal Svo. ^ggMajMB^j^WB ! fc i t ilW i l liitfr "'■'*'«' ■*-J''"""='*'«" \\^ u W o K K s preparhtg for Publication, The TOPOGRAPHY of ATHENS, with some Remarks on its Antiquities. By Lieut.-Col. Lhake, 8vo. On the ADMINISTRATION of CIUJVTTNAL JUSTICE in ENGLAND, and on the SPIRIT of the BRITISH CONSTITLTION, By M. CoTTiJ, one of tlie Judges of the Royal Court of Paris, 8vo. M. Cottu was directed by the government of France to make himself acquainted with the criminal jurisprudence of England, and more espe.cially with all that relates to the Irial by Jury. He was fortunate in bringins; ktlers of intfoductiou to some of our eminent counsel, and particularly to Mr. Scarlett, whom he- accon)panie