COLUMBIA LIBRARIES OFFSITE Ml Al IHSf;ll NCI SStANOMII) HX641 37120 RC31 3.N48 B86 The cost oi tubercul RECAP Buffalo, Departaieiit of Health The cost of tuberculosis to the county of Erie, PC 3/3. A/^^ ^K6 intl)f(£itPof3'Irttig(jrk COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS UBRARY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Open Knowledge Commons http://www.archive.org/details/costoftuberculosOObuff College of Physicijuis and ^>ucg♦qf»»^ LiJbcMT The Cost of Tuberculosis to the County of Erie PUBLISHED BY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BUFFALO, N. Y. FRANCIS E. FRONCZAK, M. D., Health Commissioner. ^' ; :, nil ^ ^1 e 2. I 3 ■ f^"^^' The Co^ of Tuberculosis to the County of Erie. (A study based upon the conclusions of Ifn in^ Fisher, Chairman of the Committee of One Hun- dred on National Health.) I. THE COST IN LIVES. In the year 1909, the deaths in Erie County from tuberculosis were in excess of seven hundred ; from pulmonary tuberculosis, there were 632 deaths; from all other forms of tuberculosis, about 120; making in all 752 deaths as the harvest from this disease in one year. (Figures on pulmonary tuberculosis from the State Department of Health. — Non-pulmonary deaths are an estimate based upon usual percent- age found, as State Department of Health had no classified figures on non-pulmonary forms for Erie County only.) There is much reason for believing that a large number of deaths recorded as pneumonia, etc., are due to tuberculosis. The depleting influence of tuberculosis can be discerned in the fact that, unlike other diseases, it takes its victims at their most productive and p-»Cot hopeful time of life. Then, again, to quote Prof. Fisher, "Deaths from tuberculosis among such classes as are chiefly a burden — paupers, criminals and defective classes in penal institu- tions, refoiTnatories and poor houses — is ex- tremely small." In short, not only does the largest percentage of these deaths come in the productive years of life, but among the industrious, the most self-sacrificing and self-respecting citizens of the community. Tuberculosis takes those who are the most worthy and not the vicious. The least useful do not suffer so much as those whom every 2 community would be ^lad to preserve and keep with them. A well-known writer says: '^Con- sumption is the most certain of the afflictions of the poor. It is tuberculosis that keeps the lives of the poor, like their annals, short." In the report of the Committee of One Hundred on National Health, prepared by the National Con- servation Commission, Professor Irving Fisher, the Chairman of that Committee, asserted that from the most conservative point of view 75 per cent, of the deaths from tuberculosis could be prevented. Many others assert that 90 per cent, of the cost of tuberculosis can be prevented. Professor Fisher, considering that the deaths occur in the earlier years of life, concludes that the eradication of tuberculosis would save on an aver- age at least twenty-Tour years for each person who now falls victim. This is making what appears to be a very generous allowance for the fact that the lives saved are weak. Allowing for the proportion of the years now devoted to productive labor, Professor Fisher con- cludes further, ' * That the working period lost by death is at least seventeen years for each dying- consumptive;" but assuming we could extend the lives of those now dying of tuberculosis fifteen years, what an enormous gain would result ! 11. COST IN DISABILITY. Dr. Marshall L. Price of Baltimore, now Secre- tary of the State Board of Health, in the intensive "Study of the Economic Course of Consumption in Wage-Earners," says that deaths among several hundred workers in Maryland were preceded by an average period of one year and six months of total disability, following a previous period of one year and seven months of partial disability, during which the workmaai was able to earn about half wages. 3 Dr. Fibber conc'ludcs that the estimate of three years and oue month made by Dr. Price is ex- tremely conservative, and could, without exagger- ation, be said to be four years of disability. III. COST IN UNHAPPINESS. In addition to the cost of lives and disability, there is to be considered the cost in disappoint- ment and uuhappiness, not alone of the consump- tive, but of his family and friends — the cost of human misery. Who can measure the fathomless cost due to this cause? While it cannot be meas- ured in terms of money, it is surely a cost that ought to be the concern of every human being whose heart beats in sympathy with the suffering. IV. COST IN MONEY. Following a long discussion of this phase of the subject, Dr. Fisher concludes that the most conser- vative estimate that can be placed upon the economic loss of the community from the death of each consumptive is $8,000.00. Some authori- ties place it higher, some lower, but to fall well within safe figTires, let us take the extremely cautious estimate of $5,000.00. The deaths in Erie County in 1909 from tuber- culosis in all its phases were over 750, but for the sake of easier computation we will take 750 in round numbers. Taking the conservative figure of $5,000.00, although some say it might well be calculated, by considering all the items involved, as high as $11,500.00, we find that the annual waste to the County in the economic loss is $3,750,000.00. In a period of ten years, which is a very short time in the life of an institution like a hospital, this loss will amount up to the stupendous sum of $37,500,000.00. If the yearly death rate were reduced ton per cent., there would be a saving to the County of $;j,750,000.00 in ten years. If twenty per cent., the saving would Ix; $7,500,000.00. If twenty-five per cent., there would be a saving in ten years of $11,250,000.00, and if of forty per cent., there would be a saving of $15,000,000.00; and if the death rate could be decreased seventy-five per cent., which Dr. Fisher concluded would be a con- servative estimate as to the preventable deaths from this disease, the saving to the County would be $28,125,000.00 in ten years, or $2,812,500 every year. These figures are not fanciful, but the conclu- sions of a hard-headed, practical student whose every-day work makes him familiar with the sub- ject he discusses. These conclusions are based upon the capitalized value of the economic loss due to the early death of a life whicb by preventable measures could be prolonged. LOSS TO THE CONSUMPTIVE. Dr. Fisher further divides his economic loss by reason of the death of each consumptive into two parts. First, into the loss to the consumptive himself, 60 per cent. ; and Second, into the loss to others than the con- sumptive by reason of his death, 40 per cent. First, in relation to the consumptive, taking our 750 as the number of deaths in the County every year, and 60 per cent, of $5,000.00 or $3,000.00 as the loss to the indi^ddual himself, we find that the yearly loss to the consumptives themselves is $2,250,000.00, or, for a period of ten years, $22,- 500,000.00. Decreasing the death rate 10 per cent., then, would amount to a saving of $2,250,000.00 for a period of ten years. Deoreasiug the death rate 20 per cent, would amoimt to a saving to the eonsunii)tives themselves of ^"30,000.00 nnimally, or $4,500,000.00 lor a period of ten years. Decreasing the annual death rate 25 per cent, would amount to a saving to the eonsmnptives themselves of $562,500.00 annually, or $5,625,000.00 in ten years. Decreasing the death rate 40 per cent, would amount to a saving to the consumptives them- selves of $900,000.00 yearly, or $9,000,000.00 in ten years. Decreasing the death rate 75 per cent., the con- servative estimate which Professor Fisher says is the percentage of preventable deaths from this cause, the saving to the consumj^tives themselves would be $1,687,500.00 yearly, or $16,875,000.00 for a period of ten years. Taking the death rate again of 750 for the County, and $2,000.00 which, on the basis of our calculation, is the loss to others than the consump- tive by reason of his death, we find that : The yearly loss to others than the consumptive himself is $1,500,000.00, or $15,000,000.00 for a period of ten years. LOSS TO OTHERS THAN THE CONSUMPTIVE. Decreasing the death rate 10 per cent, would save to others than the consumptive $150,000.00 yearly, or $1,500,000.00 for a period of ten years. Decreasing the death rate 20 per cent, would be a saving to others than the consumptive of $300,- 000.00 annually, and for a period of ten years $3,000,000.00. Decreasing the death rate 40 per cent, would amount to a saving to others than the consumptive of $600,000.00 yearly, or for a period of ten years of $6,000,000.00. 6 Decreasing tlie deaths from tliis disease 75 per cent., the conservative estimate of Dr. Fisher, would amount to a saving of $1 ,1 25,000.00 yearly to others than the consumptive, and to $11,250,000.00 for a period of ten years. In estimating these deaths to have the economic value of $5,000.00, the non-workers have been included, the man's wife and dependent members of his family as having to him and to the commun- ity an economic value, as Professor Fisher says, *'The man who spends a great deal on his family does so because they are so precious to him, and this expenditure, while a cost, is mostly significant as indicating that he conceives a sentimental value which is high, though impossible to express in figures." But if all those who are not wage- earners were eliminated, the net cost would be reduced only one-half. Even if we do this, assum- ing that the man's wife, sons and daughters have no economic value, we would still have enormous economic waste, to say nothing of the irreparable waste of human life. LOSS TO THE CHILDREN. The most pathetic thing about the unnecessary deaths from tuberculosis is the fact that it deprives the children of almost everything that makes for their future. Deprived of their father and the economic advantages that come from his earning power, to refer to the economic factors only, the child's physical development is stunted, his educational advantages sadly curtailed, and if he survives he is thrown on the world half edu- cated and at a great disadvantage with his fellows in his struggle for a livelihood. An investigation recently made in Troy, N. Y., showed that 52 per cent, of the inmates of the orphan's homes there were orphaned by reason of the death of either one or both the parents from tuberculosis. SAVE THIS WASTE OF LIVES AND MONEY. To make the iiglit against tuberculosis will, of course, cost money, but, as Professor Fisher says, *'The light against tuberculosis is bound to be costly, and consists, in fact, of substituting money cost invested in hospitals, attendants, and educa- tion for the far greater cost now incurred from death and invalidism." All authorities agree, as stated by one of their number, that "from an economic point of view, the investment in isolation hospitals for incurables is at present j^robably the most profitable method of spending money for reducing the cost of tuber- culosis." **That tuberculosis may be practically eradi- cated is evidenced by the fact that the mortality varies so greatly in different commimities, and is declining in almost all." Probably the most striking paper of all those read at the International Conference on Tubercu- losis was the one by Newsholme of England, in wfiicli he showed from an examination of the mor- tality records of Europe and America, that the decline in the death rate from tuberculosis had been exactly proportionate to the number of hospital beds provided. Hospitals for incipients, — for the early cases, — to cure those whom it is possible to cure. Hospi- tals for the advanced, to make their declining days easier, and to save the rest of the community from infection are the two great needs. Dr. Morris LetuUe truly says, "The consump- tive is made, not born." In our modern congested life in industry and housing; in our failure to properly protect the well, we have made the con- sumptive. AVill we do what we can to stop the spread of this disease and undo the evil we have done ? 8 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES This book is due on the date indicated below, or at the expiration of a definite period after the date of borrowing, as provided by the rules of the Library or by special ar- rangement with the Librarian in charge. DATE BORROWED DATE DUE DATE BORROWED DATE DUE czad i40)Mioo B86 Buffalo, 5eDf .p , '-^he cost of ;,v ^'^^^*^- county r,- Brie7 ''"■'■'^^^^ "^'^ "^^^^