^ HXdo0 11819 f^ : ^^*-^^ Lm>^^^l^' ..^c^^^cMi Y .^ The Significance of Muscular Variations, Illustrated by Reversions of the Anti-Brachial Flexor Group. By GEO. S. HUNTINGTON. [Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci., Vol. XIV. (Aug. 28, 1S95) 231-259.] Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2010 witii funding from Open Knowledge Commons (for the Medical Heritage Library project) http://www.archive.org/details/significanceofmuOOhunt THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MUSCULAR VARIATIONS, ILLUSTRATED BY. REVERSIONS OF THE ANTI-BRACHIAL FLEXOR GROUP. By Geo. S. Huntington. Read by Title, Feb. 11, 1895. The study of muscular variations, if carried on systematically, embracing observations made on a large number of subjects, cannot fail to reveal certain finer differentious, which, while lost in a mere enumerative record of muscle variations, gain a new and important significance when grouped together and com- pared in an eflfort to trace the morphological meaning of the variant condition. This becomes most strikingly apparent in the case of certain appendicular muscles, and especially of some muscles of the fore-limb. The extreme modifications which, in vertebrates possessing an anterior extremity, widely diflferent functional requirements have impressed on this portion of the locomotoiy apparatus, may properly be held responsible for the fact that here variations of the most composite t^^pe are to be encountered. A glance at the divergent forms presented by the vertebrate pectoral girdle will convince us that the muscular structures connected with the same must offer deviations from the primitive types, which not onlj^ change the arrangement of homologous muscles in different forms, but which will afford the opportunity for numerous reversions to the original con- dition in the case of any individual muscle. The specialization of the fore-limb, in exchanging a purely or chiefly locomotory function for one which includes or substitutes the prehensile function, and the consequent higher development of the manus, has more especially served to single out the anti- brachial flexor group, and to add to the function of flexing the forearm at the elbow-joint the more complicated movements of radial rotation in supination of the hand. In some instances this additional functional requirement has sufficed to specialize certain members of the flexor group as supinators, modifying the insertion so as to restrict the same chiefly or entirely to the radius, and separating a portion of the flexor mass by complete cleavage from adjoining muscular strata. This is most excellently seen in the so-called Biceps flexor cubiti of Man and Primates generally, a muscle which acts as PVlU" /'Jt •23"2 TRANSACTIONS OF THE [MAY 13, one of the chief radial supinators, while its flexor function is to a considerable extent subordinated to this main action. In muscles of this type variations are frequently encoun- tered, many of them being reversional in character and pointing to previ.Q.ns ancestral types of myotectiire. The definition, which certain muscular attachments obtain by specialization of function, is accompanied by the concomitant reduction or elimination of other connections which have lost their original value and significance in the new sphere of the muscle, or would even, if retained, interfere with the same. The muscle, in returning in an incomplete form to these ob- solete conditions, presents reversions to which many of the ob- served variations may properly be ascribed. No muscle presents these features more strongl}' developed than the Biceps flexor cubiti. The muscle is, next to the Pal- maris longus, the most variable in the body, Macalister* in his Catalogue of Muscular Anomalies enumerating no less than 45 separate variations. It is our purpose in the present paper to discuss only a cer- tain group of these variations, and to endeavor to obtain an in- sight into their significance. The human material, on which the following observations have been made, consists of 464 upper extremities dissected during the year 1893 to 1894 in the Anatomical Laboratory of Columbia College. As the explanation of the probable derivation and significance of certain of these variations of the Biceps muscle is closely con- nected with the morphology of the remaining antibrachial flexor group, it will be desirable to take a general view of the ar- rangement of this group, before proceeding to the details. In the lowest vertebrates a continuous and non-segmented plane of muscular fibres proceeds from the ventral aspect of the trunk to the flexor surface of the anterior limb. This condition is best represented b}- the muscular apparatus of the pectoral fin in fishes. In ascending the scale differentiation leads to the more or less complete separation of this muscular mass into layers and strata, which may or ma}- not preserve connections with each other, in- dicative of their original union. A consideration of the general arrangement of the flexors of the forearm in higher vertebrates reveals the existence of three main divisions or laj-ers,^ more or less blended with each other. ♦Alexander Maealister. Additional Observations on Muscular Anomalies in Human Anatomy (III. Series), with a Catalogue of the Principal Muscular Variations hitherto published. Transact, of the Royal Irish Academy, Vol. XXV., Pt. I., Dublin, 1872. t G. M. Humphry, Obser\-ations in Myology, Cambridge and London, 1872, p. 163. 1895.] NEW YORK ACADEMY OP SCIENCES. 233- 1. Superficial layer, a portion of the superficial ventro-ap- pendieular muscular sheet, reaching, usually by combination with the succeeding layer, a skeletal or fascial insertion in the forearm. Usuall}^ but few and unimportant traces of this la3' er are found in higher forms, the great bulk of the superficial fibres passing from the trunk to the anterior extremity terminating, as Pectoralis Maj or and Latissimus dorsi, respectively on the radial and ulnar margin of the humerus. Occasionally, however, the Pectoralis Major is not arrested at the radial tubercle of the humerus, but, as in Orycteropus, accompanies the Biceps to the radius, or, as in the Otter and Wildcat, together with some fibres of the Trapezio-Deltoid, accompanies the Brachialis anticus to the ulna, or, as in the Seal, expands into the fascia of the fore- arm and thus reaches the hand.* 2. Intermediate layer, constituting the " extrinsic " limb muscles of Humphry, derived from the deeper portion of the ventro-appendicular sheet, forming muscles arising from the pectoral girdle and passing over the elbow to the bones of the forearm. This group is represented by the Biceps, which muscle, besides its relation to the Coraco-humerals, presently to be considered, presents various degrees of continuity with, and separation from, the following layer. 3. Deep layer, formed by the "intrinsic " limb muscles, aris- ing from the humerus, and pursuing the same course as the 2nd layer, represented by the Brachialis anticus, or in some in- stances (Hippopatamus) by the Brachio-radialisf , which mus- cle in this animal is larger and occupies the space on the outer side of the humerus from which the Brachialis anticus usually arises. Here we meet with a replacement of the usual Brachio-ulnar by a Brachio-radial flexor, to the complete exclusion of the former. The 2d and 3d laj^ers, i. e., Biceps and Brachialis anticus, either considered by themselves, or more especially when viewed in the light of their mutual relation, present many points of morphological interest, and suggest explanations of human re- visional variations of the former muscle. A general review of the conditions found in the anti-brachial flexor graup will call for the consideration of the following points : I. Morphology of the Bicep)S, the variations of the muscle and their significance. * Humphry, op. cit., p. 147. t Humphry, op. cit., p. 163. 234 TRANvSACTIONS OF THE [MAY 13, II. Relations of Biceps to the adjoining deep ventro-ap)pendic- vlar muscles, viz.: the Goraco-humerals. Ill Relations of Biceps to the deep intrinsic flexor of the forearm, viz.: the Brachialus anticus. I. Morphology of the Biceps Flexor Cubiti. We may in the first place consider the composition of the human Biceps in the light derived from the comparative study of the muscle in other vertebrates. Although our knowledge of comparative myolog\' is still somewhat meagre, considering the extent of the subject, and al- though the results of investigations appear at times too frag- mentary and uncertain, yet enough is known to justify us in regarding the form in which the Biceps usually presents itself in man as the result of certain specializations of function acquired by the upper extremity, which have brought about a greater de- finition of certain portions, whereas other parts, lacking the stimulus of this functional requirement, have retrograded and have become to a great extent rudimentar}- or entirelj' elimin- ated. A. Origin. In the complete form the Biceps occupies two points of origin from the shoulder-girdle corresponding to the anterior edge of the glenoid socket and to the coracoid element. The actual arrangement of the muscle in individual forms will be naturally greatly influenced by the structure of the girdle, and notably by the predominance or reduction of the coracoid and its appendages. An instance of this is afforded b}' the extensive Coraco-radial muscle which represents the Biceps in Cryptobranchus japonicus, whereas, in man}' other forms, the coracoid origin of the muscle is much reduced or ab- sent, and the Biceps appears as arising solel}' from the glenoid margin. A glance at the arrangement in the vertebrate series will im- mediately indicate that the origin of the muscle is confined, strictly speaking, to the coracoid element of the pectoral girdle. It ma}^ arise hy a single head, or, as in man, the origin may be double, hence the name. If, as in us, the coracoid is reduced and the scapula corre- spondingly increased, the muscle, if it preserves its double origin, will arise b}- one head from the small coracoid process, by the other from that portion of the glenoid margin which is con- tributed by the coracoid bone. If the long tendon of the glenoid head of our Biceps is examined in subjects between the ages of 1895.] NEW YOKE ACADEMY OP SCIENCES. 235 ten and puberty, it will be found in every instance connected with the so-called sub-coracoid centre of ossification. Hence our division of the muscle into glenoid or scapular, and coracoid heads, while convenient as corresponding to adult con- ditions, should not cause the fact to be forgotten that the Biceps is entirely a coracoid muscle in in its origin. We might, considering the probable significance of our coracoid ossification, speak of the coracoid or long and precoracoid or short head of the muscle. The origin of the Biceps taking place in this man- ner from a single skeletal element, it is not surprising to find the consolidation of the two heads, which are present in man and the primates generally, to be of very frequent occurrence in lower forms. It will then depend upon the prominence of the coracoid element, and the relation of the origin to the glenoid socket, whether this single head will be denominated as the coracoid or glenoid muscle. B. Insertion. In like manner we find a considerable range in variation in the insertion of the muscle. It may be attached to either or both bones of the forearm, according to the functional character of the limb, and the specialization of rotatory radial movements of the forearm and hand. Moreover, in forms presenting the origin by two heads from the pectoral girdle, either or both of the girdle heads may be connected with either, or, hy division of the insertion, with both of the forearm bones. Consequently the analysis of the Biceps muscle would result as follows, retaining the names " glenoid " and " coracoid " as designating respectively the outer and inner girdle origins of the muscle : Complete type form of muscle, four heads. 1. Gleno-radial. 3. Goraco-radial. 2. Gleno-ulnar. 4- Coraco-ulnar. This type becomes inodified in various forms by reduction and elimination of two or more heads, so as to present a number of variations. Krause* first pointed out this quadricipital character of the human Biceps, based on careful dissection of the muscle and analj^sis of the fibres at the insertion. He also collected a number of comparative anatomical facts in support of this view of the compound character of the muscle. A by no means exhaustive consideration of the structure of the Biceps in the lower animals reveals the existence of the following reduc- * W. Krause, Specielle und Macroscopische Anatomie, Hanover, 1879, p. 223. 236 TRANSACTIONS OF THE [maY, 13, tions ami combinations of the four type lieads of origin and their insertion. I. Gleno-radial alone. A typical instance is pi-esented by Talpa europea. Geohe- gan * describes the muscle in this animal as follows : The Bi- ceps is single-headed, arising just above the glenoid articular surface by a long tendon which passes through a groove in the extreme anterior end of the humerus ; this groove is at first a tunnel. It is onl}- after it has passed the elbow that the muscle becomes fleshy. Insertion below the middle of the radius. Welcker f corrects this statement to read that the insertion is above the middle of the radius. Other forms presenting the Glenro-radial muscle are : Nj'Cti- pitheeus, Stenops, Horse, Ruminants, | Lutra vulgaris. § II. Goraco-radial alone. This form of the Biceps muscle is presented by Orycteropus capensis, Rhinoceros, Frog, Toad, Lacerta, || Phoca vitulina.^ In this animal the muscle arises from the coracoid process, is inserted into the radial tuberosity, and is combined with a short head, which is connected with the Brachialis anticus. III. Gleno-ulnai- alone. The muscle occurs in this form in H^'rax capensis and in Ro- dents generally.** lY. Coraeo-ulnar alone. Humphry .fl in describing the muscular s^-stem of Crypto- branchus japonicus gives the following account of the Coraco- brachialis longus. " This is the largest muscle arising from the coracoid. It arises from the hinder edge of the coracoid and divides into two portions. Of these the larger and inner or lower division is in- serted into the ulnar edge of the humerus for a quarter of an inch above the internal condj'le ; the other division, being nearly *Geohegan, Myology of the Fore-limb of Talpa europea, Proceedings Dublin Biolog. Assoc, Vol. I., 1875, p. 5. t Welcker, H., Archiv f. Anatomic und Entwicklungsgeschichte, 1878, p. 23. X Krause, op. cit., p. 22?i. 'i Lucae, J. C. G., Die Robbe und Otter (Phoca vitulina und Lutra vulgaris) in ihrem Knochen und Muskelskelet, Frankfurt a/ j,_ 1873, p. 204. I Krause, op. cit., p. 223. \ Lucae, op. cit., p. 199. ** Krause, op. cit., p. 223. W. Krause, Anatomic des Kaninchens, p. 107. tt Op. Cit., p. 33. 1895.] NEW YORK ACADEMY OE SCIENCES. 237 as large, is partl}^ inserted into the side of the long tendon of the Biceps, while a bundle of its fibres is continvied on over the elbow, and is inserted into the ulna near the joint. The last de- scribed division must represent the short or coracoid origin of the Biceps in man. There is no trace of it in Menobranch, Axolotl or Newt. The muscle in them, though large, is confined to the humerus in its insertion." The Coraco-radialis or Biceps arises from the external sur- face of the coracoid, between the Epicoraco-brachial (Pectoralis minor) and the short Coraco-brachial, as a fan shaped muscle, the fibres of which pass across the short Coraco-brachial and soon converge into a long tendon, which runs down beneath the Pec- toral. Having passed the Pectoral it receives the fibres of the long Coraco-brachial, passes over the elbow joint, and is inserted into the palmar surface of the upper end of the radius close to the joint. It is supplied by the nerve which perforates the scap- ula and which supplies also the superficial Coraco-brachial. Y. Gleno-radial and Coraco-radial. Meckel * describes the double-headed Biceps of Ornithorrhyn- chus paradoxurus, one head arising from the anterior, the other from the posterior coracoid, the muscle passing to be inserted into the radius. YI. Gleno-radial and Gleno-idnar . Dog. Origin : By a single strong tendon from the edge of the glen- oid fossa, the tendon passing through the capsular ligament of the joint. Insertion: By a strong tendon chiefly- into the ulna, although attached also to the radius by a smaller slip. Other forms presenting the same arrangement of the muscle : Choloepus didact^-lus.f Two-toed sloth. Origin: ^y a long and strong tendon from the glenoid border of . the scapula, passing down through the intertubercular groove in the capsule of the shoulder. The muscle descends on the arm, dividing into two strongly develoijed bellies, one passing with the Pectoralis and Deltoid to the tuberosity of the radius, the other with the Brachialis anticus to the coracoid process of the ulna. * System der Vergleichenden Anatomie, p. 516. tLucae, J. C. G., Der Fuchsafie und das Faulthier (Lemur macaco and Choloepus didactylus) in ihrem Knochen-und Muskelskelet, Frankfurt ^j m, 1882. 238 TRANSACTIONS OF THE [MAY. 13, The combination of glono-raxlial and gleno-uluar muscle is also noted in the Pig and Cat. YII. Gleno-radial and Goraco-ulnar. Uromastix spinipes.* Origin: by two distinct portions from coracoid, one tendin- ons from proximal part, the other muscular more laterally from anterior part, corresponding with the coracoid and glenoid origins in man. Insertion: After being joined by Brachialis anticus, which is large, arising from the lower part of the humerus, the con- joined tendon is inserted into the radius and ulna. VIII. Coraco-radial and Gleno-ulnar. In Marsupials, in which the two muscles are entirely separate from each other.f IX. Coraco-Radial and Coraco-Ulnar. This arrangement of the muscle is found in Em3'S and Cha- meleon. | A general consideration of the facts above adduced leads to the natural conclusion that the Biceps muscle of the fore-limb, or its homologue, presents throughout the vertebrate series evi- dences in its structure and. arrangement of a general type-plan of construction, modified in the ditferent groups by the functional requirements of the Jimb, and in all probability' b}' the varying relations assumed by the tendon of origin to the capsule and the cavity of the humero-scapular articulation. I believe that this fundamental type-construction of the appendicular muscular SA'stem is the element to which we must refer for the explanation of deviations from the arrangement normally found in any- one species. Partial returns to the potential t3'pe-form constitute reversions of far broader significance than those usually grouped under the head of atavism. In respect to the human subject, as well as in the case of the remaining vertebrates, and especially mammalia, our exact knowledge regarding the lines of descent of present orders and sub-orders is still so rudimentary and imperfect, that the im- propriet}' of referring nearly all muscular variations to atavism and direct inheritance becomes at once apparent. The fact that ♦Humphry, op. cit., p. 64. tKrause, op. cit., p. 223. JKrause, op. cit., p. 223. 1895.] NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. 239 in ease of any given human muscular variation, a muscle of similar character is found in one of the lower vertebrates does not warrant the assumption that both are derived by inheritance from an immediately precedent common ancestral form. The form in which the variant human muscle appears normally may be incalculably far removed from man, may even belong to a dif- ferent vertebrate class. That the structural coincidence of the two muscles is to be taken as indicating anything more than the most generalized relationship of vertebrates is difficult to be- lieve. For many of the aberrant muscular conditions observed in man a very comprehensive view as to their derivation must be a,dopted. I believe that we are right in referring such varia- tions, as will be considered in detail below, to the development of an inherent constructive type, abnormal for the species in ques- tion, but revealing its morphological significance and value by appeai'ing as the normal condition in other vertebrates. The question, as far as it affects the variations to be considered, may be represented graphically somewhat in the following man- ner : X y X y Fig. 1. Type form of Muscle. FiG. 2. Cleavage variation. In Fig. 1 let the line a-b represent the skeletal origin, the line x-y the corresponding insertion of a muscular plane. Oonsidering this arrangement as the type, in which the entire space between origin and insertion is occupied by an uninter- rupted muscular plane, it will become apparent that modifica- tions of this type can take place in two ways, 1. Cleavage variations, retaining in general the original scope of origin and insertion, in which the original muscular plane ap- pears as two or more distinct muscles. (Fig. 2.) 2. Reduction variations, where a portion of the origin or of 240 TRANSACTIONS OF THE h [may 13, Fig. 3. Keductioii vari.ition; Origin retained; Insertion reduced. Fig. 4. Eeduction variation; Origin retained ; Insertion reduced. Fig. 5. Reduction variation; Oiigin and Insertion reduced; Points re- tained. Fig. 6. Reduction variation; Origin and Insertion reduced; Points ex- changed. h Fig. 7. Reduction variation; Origin and Insertion rediiced; Points re- tained. Fig. 8. Reduction variation; Origin and Insertion reduced ; Points ex- changed. 1895.] NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES h 241 Fig. 9. Eeduction variation; Origin reduced. ; Insertion retained. Fig. 10. Eeduction variation; Origin reduced; Insertion reta,ined. the insertion, or of both, is eliminated, necessitating, under some conditions, a change in the direction of the muscular fibres. These variations are represented schematically by Figs. 3-10, it being of course evident that the arbitrarily selected points a and &, and x and y. may be placed anywhere along the lines of origin and insertion respectively. In defining the following variations in the human Biceps I pre- fer to accentuate this relation to a fundamental vertebrate type- plan, and, at the expense of introducing an additional term into the complex reversional nomenclature, I will speak of them as " Myo-typical Reversions.'''' In man the Biceps is composed of the Gleno-radial and Coraco- radial divisions, combined with a superficial ulnar fasciculus, possessing a fascial insertion along the ulnar border of the fore- arm by means of the semilunar fascia. We may group the variations which concern us here with reference to the derivation and destination of the accessory portions, representing additional glenoid and coracoid heads, which have lost their distal ulnar attachment. I. Gleno-ulnar Head. Appears in the following forms : 1. Capsulo-pectoeal tendon. Diagnosis : Tendinous fibres in the form of scattered bundles, or more compactly arranged as distinct tendon-bands, arising in conjunction with the capsular ligament from the glenoid margin of the scapula, differentiating from the capsule at the upper border of the intertubercular groove and extending downwards over the Transactions N. Y. Acad. Sci., Vol. XIV., Sig. 16, August 28, 1895. 242 TRANSACTIONS OF THE [mAY 13, long gleno-radial head, rooting in the bicipital canal and merg- ing with the deep surface of the tendon of the Pectoralis major, or, in some instances, extending beyond the pectoral tendon to the deep fascia of the arm. This is the most common form in which the variation presents itself. Cases : 1. 9, white, U. S., aet. 62. January 30, 1894. Plate XVII. Right upper extremity: A distinct tendon, imbedded in the capsule of the joint, over- h'ing the intertubercular groove, covering the long bicipital tendon and passing to the deep surftice of the Pectoralis major tendon, on which it spreads out in the upper third, terminating b}- interlacing with the pectoral tendon fibres. Left upper extremity : Presents the same slip, more strongly developed, extending nearly to the lower border of the Pectoralis major tendon. Plate XVIII. Capsule between the tuberosities partly divided, to show the deep position of the tendon imbedded in the shoulder capsule, and indicating a tendenc}' toward intra-articular immi- gration. Plate XIX. The same joint opened from behind, with head of humerus removed. The thickened strand on the inner surface of the anterior wall of the capsule, just in'front of the long Biceps tendon, is directlv continuous with the fibres of the tendon slip. 2. S \ Austria, \aet. 05. October 11, 1893. Plate XX. Right upper extremity. Strong fibrous band arising from capsule over lesser tuber- osity, and descending over long tendon of Biceps, connected with deep surface of 'Pectoralis major tendon, to the lower mar- gin of which it extends. A tendon band from anterior part of capsule passes to outer mar- _gin of short head, indicating tendency to subdivision of this head. 3. 9. Germany, aet. 84. '' November 9, 1893. ■Plate XXI. Right upper extremity. Well marked strong fibrous fasciculus, extending from cap- sule of shoulder joint over the bicipital groove and contents to the deep surface of the Pectoralis major tendon. Some fibres merge with the pectoral tendon, while others continue below its inferior margin to join the deep fascia of the arm. The left upper extremity of the same subject presents a transition to the form next to be described (Gleno-uluar muscle). A strong tendinous band, incorporated at its origin in the cap- sule of the shoulder joint, passes downward, covering in the bi- cipital groove and attaching itself to the upper margin and deep 1895.] NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. 243 surface of the Pectoralis major tendon. In part continuous with this tendon band, in part arising independently from the deep surface of Pectoralis tendon, four muscular slips arise, the two upper passing backward, the two lower downward, to in- corporate themselves with the substance of the Biceps muscle. The bundles are all distinctly muscular in character. The following additional instances, in which the aboA'e de- scribed band was present, were noted in the series : 4. ^, U. S. white, aet. 38. December 27, 1893. Small glenoid tendon slip joining deep surface of Pectoralis major tendon over the bicipital groove. Present on both sides. 5. 9 Ireland, aet. 72. January 9, 1894. Slip present on both sides. 6. $ Ireland, aet. 40. December 21, 1893. Right upper extremity. Large tendon band, arising from capsule external to long head of Biceps, inserted on deep surface of Pectoralis major tendon. 7. $ Ireland, aet. 32. November 28, 1893. Right side. 8. S Germany, aet. 54. Large band on left side. Insertion confined to Pectoralis major tendon. 9. $ Germany, aet. 52. December 14, 1893. Right side. Very large tendon \ inch wide, passing from glenoid margin interwoven with the capsule, to the united bellies of Biceps, with intermediate attachment to the deep surface of Pectoralis major tendon. 10. $ Ireland, aet. 40. Both extremities. Strong tendon from glenoid edge to deep surface of Pectoralis major tendon. 11. $ Italy, aet. 50. Right side. Very broad tendon slip, in part continued beyond Pectoralis tendon into the Biceps. 12. 9 ,,IJ. S., negro, aet. 24. Left side : Glenoid tendon to junction of heads of Biceps. 2. Gleno-Dlnar Muscle. Occurs in three forms or variations : (a.) Origin identical loith that of the Capsulo-pectoral tendon, passing downward and presenting a more or less close connection 244 TRANSACTIONS (»F THE [MAV 13, xcith the deep surface of the Pectoralis major tendon. Becoming muscular a short distance beyond the loiver border of the Pec- toralis tendon the slip passes obliquely inivards across the long head, fusing with its anterior surface and inner margin, or joining the outer margin of the shoi't coracoid head. Cfl.SGS '. 1. i, U. S., white, aet. 24. November 29, 1893. Plate XXII. Right side. A strong shining tendinous band arises from the glenoid margin incorporated with the shoulder capsule. Passing down and emerging from beneath the edge of the coraco-acromial ligament, the tendon becomes closely connected with the deep surface of the Pectoralis major tendon, interlacing with its fibres at right angles, iN'ing upon the long tendon of the Biceps and forming the main portion of the roof of the inter-tubercular groove. Toward the lower portion of the pectoral tendon the inner half of the slip gradually separates itself from the same and forms a small muscular belly which joins the outer margin of the short biciptal head near its junction with the long head. The outer portion of the tendon slip gradually passes deeper into the substance of the Pectoralis tendon, with which it is in- tricately interlaced. On the bottom of the inter-tubercular groove are several well marked longitudional tendinous bands, connected below with the tendon of the Pectoralis major ; above they in part separate from the tendon, passing upward and in- ward and crossing at right angles the tendon fibres of Latissimus dorsi and Teres major; in part they go upward and outward, 1\'- iug in the floor of the bicipital groove under cover of the long Biceps tendon. A small third internal humeral head of the Biceps is present in the same arm, derived from the Coraco-brachialis insertion. 2. ^ , U. S.. white, aet. 50. Plate XXIII. Right upper extremit}-. Tendon slip with intermediate attachment to deep surface of Pectoralis major tendon, arising in connection with capsular ligament from the glenoid margin, and passing to the inner bor- der of the long bicipital head, at the line of junction with the short head. 3. .?, Ireland, aet. 32. November 29, 1893. Plate XXTIII. Left upper extremity of subject, whose right upper extremity- presents the variation described under " b 2," Plate XXYII. vidi ibid. 4. $ , U. S., negro, aet. 50. December 14, 1893. Plate XXIY. Right side. Tendon in part fused with deep surface of Pectoralis major 1895.] NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. 245 tendon at the lower border of which a short muscular belly de- velops which joins the Biceps. Between the long and short bicipital heads an additional ten- don slip arises from the capsule, near the base of the coracoid process, and, passing down on the outer side of the short Biceps tendon, receives some upper fibres of insertion of a short Coraco- brachialis superior, and then joins the outer margin of the short Biceps head just before the latter meets the long head. The left side of the same subject presents an instance of the next succeeding form. 5. i)er extieniity. $ , Germany, aet. 66. Gleuo-ulnar head, var. 3, Gleno-epitroclilear tendou. Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. Vol. XIV., PL. XXXII. m^l'**^ \ ■N ;'M/ PLATE XXXIII. Left upper extremity.