COLUMBIA LIBRARIES OFFSITE HEALTH SCIENCES STANDARD HX00034550 ffifllumbia Mmu^mtg ^ in t\^t Olitg 0f Nfui f nrk Hfffrfttrp Slibrarg z CLINICAL MANUALS FOU Practitioners and Students OF Medicine. Intestinal Obstruction: ITS YAEIETIES. WITH THEIK PATHOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT. The Jaclisonian Prize Essay of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1883. BY FREBEEICK TREVES, F.R.C.S., SURGEON TO AND LECTURER ON ANATOMY AT THE LONDON HOSPITAL; HUNTERIAN PROFESSOR OF ANATOMY AT THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND. WITH 60 ILLUSTRATIONS. FHILABELPEIA : HENPtY C. LEA'S SON & 00. 1884. JOHN STRTJTHERS, Esq., M.D., PROFESSOR OF ANATOMY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN, AS A TOKEN OF RESPECT FOR HIS POSITION AS .^' ANATOMIST, AND AS A SLIGHT ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF JIANY ACTS OF KINDNESS. PEEFACE. The importance of the subject of Intestinal Obstruc- tion may be, in one way, estimated by the circum- stance that over two thousand individuals die every year in England alone from various forms of obstruc- tion of the bowels, exclusive of hernia. In the foUowino- work I have based the classifica- tion of the different varieties of Intestinal Obstruction upon pathological grounds rather than upon clinical distinctions. Tliis has been done for two reasons. In the hrst place, the knowledge of the morbid anatomy of Intestinal Obstruction is much more extensive and precise than is the knowledge of its clinical history; and, secondly, the arrangement is more convenient, inasmuch as it avoids much repe- tition which would otherwise be necessary. A classi- fication, however, based upon purely clinical grounds is extremely desirable, and this classification I have attempted in the chapters upon diagnosis. In the consideration of the A^arious forms of the present afi'ection I have dealt first with the patho- logical aspect of the case, then with the symptoms, and finally with the prognosis. The general diagnosis of Intestinal Obstruction, as a whole, is reserved for some special chapters, and the same method has viii Intestinal Obstruction, been adopted with regard to the whole subject of treatment. The drawings are, with a very few exceptions, original, and I am indebted to the artist, Mr. R. E. Holding, for the care he has expended upon them. The work is in substance the Essay to which the Jacksonian Prize was awarded by the College of Surgeons in 1884. The Essay was completed in December, 1883. It has been entirely revised, some parts have been re-Avritten, and such new matter lias been introduced as was required to bring the work up to date. My thanks are due to the Council of the College of Surgeons for permission to publish the Essay and certain of the plates that illustrate it. FREDERICK TREVES. 18, Gordon Square, W.C. iSejjtember, 1884. CONTENTS. CHAPTER PAGE I.— The Classification of Intestinal Obstkuction 1 n.— Some Especial Features in the Etiology of Intestinal Obstruction S ni.— Strangulation by Bands or through Aper- tures— Hernia-like Strangulation of the Bowel IS rv.— Strangulation by Bands or throlgh Aper- tures— Symptoms 62 v.— Strangulation by Bands or through Apek- TURES— Course and Prognosis .... 91 VI.— Anomalous Forms of Obstruction due to Isolated Bands and to Adhesions ... 96 YII.— Volvulus 134 Vni.— Intussusception— Pathology 166 IX.— The Etiology of Intussusception . . . .202 X.— The Symptoms op Intussusception . . .215 XI.— The Course and Prognosis of Intussusception 212 Xn.— Stricture of the Intestine— Pathology . . 252 Xm.— The Symptoms and Prognosis of Stricture of THE Intestine 285 XIV.— Obstruction of the Intestine by Neoplasms . 309 XV.— Compression of the Intestine by Tumours, etc., external to the Bowel 315 XVI.— Obstruction of the Intestine by Foreign Bodies 319 ■X Intestinal Obstruction. CHAPTEK, PAGE XVn.— Obstruction op the Intestine by Gall Stones 323 XVIII.— Obstruction by Intestinal Stones . . . 33G XIX.— Obstruction of the Intestine by F^cal Masses —Chronic Constipation— Ileus Paralyticus 3U XX.— The Diagnosis— The General Significance of the Leading Symptoms 355 XXI.— The Diagnosis of the different Forms of Intestinal Obstruction 371 XXII.— The Symptoms as modified by the Position of THE Obstruction 391 XXIII— The various Affections that have been most FREQUENTLY CONFUSED WITH CaSES OF OB- STRUCTION OF THE Bowels 100 XXIV.— The Treatment— Non-Operative Measures . 115 XXV.— The Treatment— Operative Measures . . 415 XXVI.— The Special Treatment of Individual Forms of Obstruction 193 Index . 509 toTESTiNAL Obstruction. CHAPTER I. THE CLASSIFICATION OF INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION. There are several cliiFerent plans upon wliicli a classification of the various forms of intestinal ob- struction niaj be based. Bj one method they may be divided into the two great classes of the congenital and the acquired, according to whether the conditions that produced the obstruction existed at birth, or had been subse- quently produced. Among the former may be placed such examples as depend upon congenital stenosis, upon certain congenital deformities, upon Meckel's diverticulum, upon peritoneal bands the result of intra-uterine peritonitis, and the like. Among the latter would be grouped cases of stricture following ulceration, intussusception, volvulus, strangulation by bands produced by peritonitis, cases of obstruction by foreign bodies, and indeed all the principal examples of intestinal occlusion. By another method the classification is founded upon a discrimination of the different mechanical conditions that produce the narrowing or closure of the lumen of the bowel. Thus in one set of cases the lumen of the canal is obliterated by j^'^^ssiore froin without. This division would include all cases of strangulation by bands and through apertures, and all examples of obstruction by the pressure of a tumour B— 12 2 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. i. outside the bowel. In another set of cases the intes- tine is occluded in consequence of an alteration in its normal outline and in the relation that its walls bear the one to the other. Under this headins: would be classed examples of volvulus, of occlusion by kinking and bending, and the important series of cases known as intussusceptions. In a third variety of case the lumen of tlie howel is blocked by some substance such as a foreign body that has been swallowed, a gall stone, an enterolith, a mass of ftecal matter, or a neoplasm growing from the intestinal wall. In a still further series of cases the obstruction depends upon changes arising in the wall of the gut itself and under this heading we meet with stenoses and strictures of all kinds, including both those that are simple and those that are cancerous. By a third method of classification all cases are divided according to their clinical character and are grouped into acute and subacute cases, into chronic cases and into chronic cases that end acutely. This division of the subject has been adopted in that part of the present volume which deals Avith the general subject of diagnosis. Lastly there is a method of classification based upon 2J(ithological anatomy. This is the method that has been followed in the body of the present work. This plan consists in grouping together instances of intestinal obstruction tliat are pathologically alike. It consists of such an arrangement and grouping as would probably be adopted if all the specimens of intestinal obstruction in anv larcje museum were taken, and an attempt then made to arrange them in some definite and coherent order. The classification that is founded upon this basis is the following : Strangulation by bands, etc., or through apertures. Volvulus. Intussusception. Chap. II.] Etiology. Stricture. Obstruction by neoplasms. Compression by tumours, etc., external to the bowel. Obstruction by gall stones and foreign bodies. Obstruction by enteroliths. Obstruction by fsecal masses. CHAPTEE IT. SOME ESPECIAL FEATUKES IN THE ETIOLOGY OF INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION. Into the very wide and complicated subject of the general etiology of intestinal obstruction I do not propose to enter in this place, since the more impor- tant features in the causation of the various forms of stoppage of the bowels are detailed in the account given of those diflerent forms when considered individually. There are, however, certain phases of the matter that are well worthy of a separate consideration upon special grounds, and among these may be taken the influence of the following affections in producing intestinal obstruction, viz.: Peritonitis. Sti-angulated hernia. IMescnteric gland disease. The important subject of the influence of ulcera- tion of the intestine in producing occlusion is fully considered in the chapter on stricture. Peritonitis. — It is well known that in this affection, and especially in what is known as the adhesive form, a fibrinous exudation appears upon the surface of the inflamed membrane. Any two surfaces so affected may, through the medium of the 4 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. ii. exudation, become adherent if they be brought into contact with one another. The adhesion may be over a very extensive sur- face, or may involve only a few isolated points. As the inflammation subsides there is no doubt that a good deal of this exudation is in time absorbed. Such as remains becomes organised into fibrous tissue, and so are produced " adhesions," " bands," " perito- neal false ligaments," and the like. Some of these adhesions may be extremely loose and delicate, while others are composed of a more callous material. It would appear that many of the more flimsy of these uniting structures in time disap- pear, even after they have become organised into definite connective tissue. It is much to be regretted that so little is known of the circumstances that favour the absorption of adhesions after peritonitis, and so an important element in the prognosis of that affection is lackino;. One circumstance that has distinct influence in this direction is certainly the movement of the adhering pai-ts. As an illustration of this might be taken adhesions that involve the small intestine, and that are connected with that bowel either by both of their points of attachment or by one. During the progress of peritonitis the intes- tines are relatively still. They are, moreover, more or less distended from some paralysis of their walls. As a result of this distension coils of bowel may be brought together that were hitherto far apart, or a certain loop may be placed in association with a com- paratively distant point on the parietes. When the inflammation has subsided the parts return, as far as possiljle, to the status quo ante, peristaltic move- ments spread through the intestine, coils that were close together tend, as a result of those movements, to become separated, and adhesions that attach the Chap. II.] Etiology. 5 intestine to points upon the parietes are persistently dragged upon. It follows from tliis almost constant tension that the still soft adhesion yields, becomes elongated and thinned, ultimately gives way and is absorbed. Movement also has great influence upon the future physical characters of the adhesion. Most of the adhesions assume primarily a membranous cha- racter, and this they may retain throughout their existence. It is not uncommon to find some coils of intestine matted together by an extensive series of false membranes, which appear sometimes as wide expansions, at other times as thin but broad ribbon- like bandsj of all dimensions and of various lengths (Figs. 1 and 24). If two distant coils of small intes- tine have been brought together during peritonitis, and have become attached to one another by means of the exudation, or if a like attachment has taken place between the intestine and the parietes, then, as move- ment is restored in the bowel, the adhesions, which may be quite membranous, are dragged upon, and as a result become elongated. As they increase in length so must they become attenuated in width and thickness. The constant tension, moreover, probably interferes with their already feeble nutrition, and induces a further wasting. The wide membranous adhesion may thus become narrowed and ribbon-like. It may, however, undergo a still further change. This adhesion, subjected to the rolling movements of the intestines over one another, and subjected to fre- quent tortion, now in one direction and now in the other, tends to become rounded and cord-like, and the more that it is stretched the more completely is this transformation favoured. Thus are formed " peritoneal false ligaments " and the bands that are so common a cause of strangulation of the bowel. 6 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. ii. The moulding of the mass of adhesion-tissue into a cord by the movements active within the abdomen is illustrated by the changes that are effected by those movements in the omentum when it becomes adherent. This structure may become attached by its free extremity, and in the course of time, if the abdomen be opened, it will be found to be changed into a cord-like mass. The intestines in their move- ments have rolled over and under and about the adherent membrane, and at last they have moulded it almost as a piece of clay may be moulded when rubbed betweeli the palms. This change is best brought about when the situation of the adhesion is such as to keep the membrane on the stretch. A like metamorphosis may be effected in any smaller part of the great omentum that may have become adherent to a distant point. By a combination of these various circumstances, by a stretching of the adhesion on the one hand, by its consequent attenuation on the other, and its subjection to the moulding influences of moving intestines for the third part, it happens that cords and bands of great length are often produced as a result of peritonitis. Many instances may be given, but one of the most striking is afforded by a case reported by Mr. Obre."^ In this example a cord-like band was found to pass from a coil of small intestine situated near the xiphoid cartilage to the parietal peritoneum about the inguinal canal. The false ligament measured seventeen and a half inches. The patient had had a strangulated inguinal hernia, and there was clear evidence to show that the herniated bowel had been that to which the cord was attached. Subsequent changes in the abdomen, which were asso- ciated with much violent peristaltic movement and much distension, had carried the involved coil so far * Path. Soc. Trans., vol. iii., page 95. Chap. II.] Etiology. 7 away from its original point of adhesion as to produce the band described. It must be remembered that not only may these Ijands form arcades beneath which coils of intestine may become strangulated, but the longer of them may become separated at one of their points of attachment, and so form floating cords that may lead to strangulation of a loop by " knotting." Adhesions of all kinds, but especially those attached to parts not susceptible of much movement, may undergo considerable contraction. In cases of extensive peritonitis this contraction may produce great deformity. The mesentery may become so shrunken as to produce obstruction in the intestine to which it is attached. The most severe form of this condition is that known as peritonitis deformans. Adhesions upon the surface of a fixed part of the intestine may, as a result of their contraction, pro- duce great narrowing of the bowel by compressing it. This condition is not infrequently met with in the colon, and especially in the hepatic and splenic flexures (Fig. 22). In parts of the tube where the gut cannot be compressed against an unyielding surface the contraction of peritoneal adhesions may still produce some obstruction by causing an extensive puckering of the intestinal walls. Some of the adhesions formed after inflammation oJt the serous membrane are exceedingly complicated, while others are found to unite parts that are usually far separated from one another. Thus I find in- stances of adhesion between the ascending colon and the ovary, between the transverse colon and the csecum in one case, and the mesentery over the lower lumbar region ii^ another, between the arch of the colon and a part of the parietes not far above the symphysis. Then again the sigmoid flexure has been found connected by adhesions to the bladder, the 8 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. ii. uterus, the rectum, the peritoneum in the right iliac fossa, and the csecum. In all these cases I tliink that the unusual connection of parts may be explained by displacement from distension, the distension occurring duiing the development of the peritonitis. Thus the transverse colon when distended is apt to become bent uj^on itself, and by such bending to reach the lower parts of the abdomen. In the same way the distended sigmoid flexure may turn down into the pelvis, or extend across to the right iliac region, or even mount up in the abdomen and reach the liver. In addition to the causes of obstruction already alluded to, peritonitis may be the means of bringing about an occlusion in the intestine by other and very difterent methods. The adhesions may form a part of the bowel into a rigid loop, they may bend it so acutely as to greatly narrow or even entirely obstruct its lumen, they may lead to obstruction by kinking, or they may bring about an arrangement of certain coils of small intes- tine or of the loop of the sigmoid flexure that especially favours the production of a volvulus. In another series of cases as a result of local peritonitis, the omentum or the tip of the appendix vermiformis has become adherent at one point, and beneath the arcade so formed coils of intestine have been strangulated. Similar arcades have been formed by the adhesion of the point of a free Meckel's diverticulum, and of the outer extremity of the Fallopian tube. In still another variety of case a loop of bowel has been strangulated through a slit in a membranous adhesion, or through an aperture formed by adhesions between adjacent viscera, or through the gap left between two parallel adhesions. With regard to the forms of peritonitis that may lead to adhesions capable of producing obstruction, Chap. II.] Etiology. 9 it can be briefly said that any variety of peritoneal inflammation from wliicli a patient recovers may become indirectly a cause of intestinal occlusion. In the great majority of cases, therefore, it will be found to have been a very localised peritonitis. The prin- cipal examples are furnished by the circumscribed pelvic peritonitis that is comparatively so common in women, by that attending typhlitis or perityphlitis, by that depending upon injury, or upon an ulceration of the stomach or intestine that has not quite ad- vanced to perforation. Another common form has followed upon strangulated hernia. Another has been induced by gall stones, and has led probably to adhesion between the gall bladder and the colon. Another has been set up by faecal accumulations, or by the impaction of some foreign substance in the bowel. It must be remembered also that peritonitis may occur during intra-uterine life. Dohrn, indeed, rei^oits a case of obstruction in a child eight days old that ended fatally, and was found to be due to adhesions formed evidently before birth. ''^ There is also a form of peritonitis that may occur shortly after birth, and that appears to be due to extension of inflammation from the divided umbilical cord. The variety of peritonitis known as " infantile," and which is distinct from the localised form just mentioned, is with very rare exceptions always fatal, and in the newly born would appear to be without exception fatal. Acute diflfused peritonitis is so very seldom re- covered from that it can have little concern in the etiology of obstruction. In puerperal peritonitis, according to Bauer, "an absolutely fatal prognosis * Quoted by Bauer ; Ziemsson's Cyclopaedia of Medicine, vol. viii., page 288. lo Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. ii. must be made," and the same gloomy prognosis applies to the j^eritonitis depending upon carcinoma. With regard to tubercular peritonitis, it leads in time to a certain death ; but its coui-se is usually chronic, and during its progress it is apt to produce very numerous and extensive adhesions, which are frequently the cause of intestinal obstruction. Indeed, certain writers have included chronic tubercular peri- tonitis among the varieties of chronic occlusion of the bowels. StraiigTilatcd hernia.— There is, I think, a fairly common impression that when a strangulated hernia has been reduced and the patient has recovered from the operation, no further evils will result beyond a possible return of the hernia, and with it a risk of a second strangulation. A piece of bowel, however, that has been strangulated in an external hernia and has then been reduced into the abdomen may be the cause of one of many different forms of intestinal obstruction. I do not allude to results immediately following the reduction of the hernia, but to results that are comparatively remote. Among the former, as is well known, it is not infrequent for the once strangulated loop to remain so entirely paralysed after reduction as to continue the symptoms of ob- struction until death ensues, and that, too, without either becoming gangi-enous or causing peritonitis.* The conditions Avith which I propose to deal briefly are remote, and are subsequent to the more or less complete recovery of the patient from the opera- tion. 1. The peritonitis about the reduced loop of bowel may lead to adhesions, and these may cause obstruction * See cases by Mr. Pitts, St. Thomas's Hosp. Repoi-ts, 1882, page 75 ; and Hemot (Pseudo-etranglements, page 4G). For a general consideration of the immediate effects that may follow reduction, sec " Les Accidents consecutifs a la Reduction de I'Euteroc^le <^trangl^e," by Jules Ferret. Th6se. Paris, 1879. Chap. II. J Etiology. ii by kinking or bending of the gut. On the otlier liiind, the oincntnin or a free coil of intestine may become adherent to the inflamed serous surface, and thus a condition be produced that may lead to ob- struction."*^ 2. The reduced loop may adhere to the abdominal parietes and become obstructed by bending and by the changes known as " traction effects." Examples of this form of obstruction are given in chapter vi. 3. The ad hesions about the reduced and adherent loop may be extensive, and may so contract as to narrow the lumen of the gut by compression. 4. The herniated coil may be retained in the form of a permanent loop by means of adliesions, and this loop, whether an " open " or a " closed " one, may lead to obstruction of the intestine, as is fully ex- plained in a subsequent part of this work. In one instance at least a fistula bimucosa was formed between the extremities of the loop. 5. Stricture may follow as a result of damage to the walls of the bowel, ulceration of the mucous membrane, and the like. Several illustrations of this condition will be found in the chapter upon cicatricial strictuVe. C. The great lengthening of the mesentery that is usually found in large hernia? favours especially the formation of volvulus of the small intestine. The connection between these two conditions is well shown in a case reported by Dr. J. K. Fowler, where tliere is little doubt but that a fatal volvulus of the ileum depended upon an unduly long mesentery re- sulting from hernia, t * Bull, (le la Soc. Anat., 1804, page 252 ; M. Besnier. See also Patli. Soc, Trans., vol. vii., ])age 11)8 ; Mr. Obro. i' For a further account of this matter sec a paper by the author on "The Forms of Intestinal Obstruction that may follow after Hernia " [Lancet^ Juno 7, 1884). T2 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. ii. Mesenteric g:l»iid disease.— Mesenteric gland disease may indirectly lead to obstruction in several different ways. 1. The little local peritonitis excited in tlie serous membrane covering the glands may lead to the adhe- sion of a free diverticulum, or of the free end of the omentum, or may encourage the development of bands which may in turn prove a cause of intestinal stranojulation. * 2. The local peritonitis may lead to adhesions being formed between two remote parts of the intes- tinal tube. Thus, in a case recorded by Dr. Hilton Fagge the sigmoid flexure was found attached to the ileum, and in the angle between these two adherent portions of gut was a caseous gland. + 3. The ileum about the seat of a diseased gland in the mesentery may become sharply bent upon itself ; and between the two limbs of the loop so formed, and fusing them together, as it were, will usually be found an old and degenerate gland. Or the bending may be very limited and well localised, so that a fold of the bowel is turned in and forms a sjoecies of diaphragm. This condition is shown in the remarkable, and, I think, unique, case depicted in Fig. 49. 4. In several instances the shrinking of the mesentery after extensive gland disease has been so considerable, and has produced so much distortion, as to lead to a fatal obstruction of that part of the bowel connected with the diseased area.;}; 5. Dr. Leared has reported a case of fatal stran- * Bee specimens, Guy's Hosp. Museum, No. 1,819 (36) ; and St. Bart.'s Hosp. Museum, No. 2,105 ; also cases by M. Briclieteau (Bull, de la Soc. Anat., 1861, page 118), and by Mr. B. Hill {Lancet, vol. i., 1876, page 773). f Path. Soc. Trans., vol. xxvii., page 1.57. j See Path. Soc. Trans., vol. xxi., page 187 ; and cases by Dr. Fagge, Guy's Hosj). lleports, vol. xiv., page 272. Chap. III.] Strangulation BY Bands. 13 gulation of tlie small intestine through a hole in the mesentery. It was considered that this aperture was probably caused by the breaking down of a mesen- teric gland. The patient was a lad aged 14."^ CHAPTER III. STKANGULATION BY BANDS OK THROUGH APERTURES HERNIA-LIKE STRANGULATION OF THE BOWEL. Under this variety of intestinal obstruction may be included : 1. Strangulation by isolated peritoneal adhesions, 2. Strangulation by cords formed from tbe omentum. 3. Strangulation by Meckel's diverticulum. 4. Strangulation by normal structures abnormally attached (such, as by an adherent vermiform appendix or Fallo- pian tube, or by a fixed mesentery) , including strangu- lation by the pedicle of an ovarian tumour and the hke. 5. Strangulation through slits and apertures in the mesen- tery or omentum, or in certain peritoneal Hgaments, or through membranous adhesions. These various forms may be conveniently con- sidered together, for although in each case the anatomical cause of the obstruction is different, yet the effects upon the gut are in all instances practi- cally identical. In each the segment of bowel in- volved is, almost without exception, the small intestine. In each the mechanism of the obstruction is practically the same. In each the symptoms that arise are, with some minute exceptions, so nearly identical that they may be studied as a whole. In each the course and issue of the malady are such that * Path. See. Trans., vol. xiv., page 156. 1 4 InTES TINA L ObS TR UC TION. [Chap. 1 1 1 . these various forms may be said to share a common prognosis. Between them all, moreover, there is a close bond of union in the fact that they are adapted for the same form of treatment, and may be relieved by the same operative procedures. Considered as a whole this form may be taken as the type of acute intestinal obstruction, and as such it assumes a position of considerable importance. It is the strangulated hernia of the interior of the abdomen. It obstructs the gut as a hernia obstructs. It involves the small intestine with about the same frequency as does an external rupture. It is indeed as rare to find a portion of the large intestine stran- gulated by any of the methods above named, as it is to discover colon in a femoral or inguinal hernia. The symptoms that attend this variety of intestinal obstruction are, in all main points, the symptoms of strangulated hernia, and the prognosis of the two affections depends rather upon the situation of the constricting agent than upon any other factor. It is for many reasons a matter of moment to note that strangulated hernia and the different forms of internal obstruction above described are but varieties of a single malady, that they differ from one another solely on anatomical grounds, that in their pathology and in the broader lines of their clinical history they are the same, and that, excluding the taxis, they are amenable to the same general form of surgical treat- ment. It will be convenient to consider the pathological anatomy of these five varieties of obstruction separ- ately, and then their symptoms and the elements of their prognosis collectively. PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY. 1. Strangulation by isolated peritoneal adhesions.— Those isolated adhesions (known com- Chap. III.] Strangulation BY Bands. 15 monly as "bands," "solitary bands," or "peritoneal false ligaments ") are the results or residues of some form of peritonitis. Owing to tlie high mortality of acute diffused peritonitis on the one hand, and the very general and extensive adhesions produced by chronic diffused peritonitis on the other, it follows that these isolated bands are usually due to moderate, chronic, and well localised forms of peritoneal inflam- mation. It would appear, as has been already pointed out, that in some cases they may be congenital, and due then to intra-uterine peritonitis. The mode of formation of these bands, and the methods whereby they become elongated and cord-like have already been described (chapter ii.). Their appearance in cases where they have caused obstruction varies greatly. Most commonly the " band '' takes the form of a firm fibrous cord about the size of a No. 4 or No. 6 catheter. It may be still more slender, and appear as a tough, rigid thread. On the other hand, it may be of comparatively large size ; thus M. Terrier has reported a case of internal strangulation, for which he performed laparotomy, where the constricting band had nearly the dimensions of the little finger.* The cord-like " band " is usually described as being dense and fibrous, and in one or two instances as being of almost cartilaginous hardness. Less fre- quently the constricting agent has the appearance of an actual l)and, and in such cases is found as a tough ribbon-like membrane, with a width of half an inch or even more. A band of this character is well shown in Fig. 1. 1 The " false ligament " is usually single, and hence the name bestowed upon it by Mr. Gay of "the * Bull, ct Mem de la Soc. dc Chir. de Taris, vol. iv., 1879, page 5G4. t London Hosp. Museum, No. Ad. 78. 1 6 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. hi. solitary band." It must not be assumed, however, tliat such a band commonly exists as the solitary adhesion in any given case. It most probably will be the only isolated adhesion, and the only one so modified as to be capable of strangulating the bowel. But in cases where this isolated adhesion is met with other adhesions will very usually be found. This is Fig. 1.— Strangulation by a broad Pei-itoueal Baud passing between two adjacent Coils of Ileum. especially the case when the band is due, as it often is, to pelvic peritonitis. The same ajiplies, although in a less degree, to the local peritonitis set up by inflammation in or about the caecum. Here, in addi- tion to any adhesion that may have become isolated, elongated, and cord-like, there will very probably be some matting together of parts in the immediate vicinity of the caput coli. ^lany cases, however, are reported wliere the only relics of a typhlitis have assumed the form of one solitary band, A single false ligament, the representative of a single adhesion, Chap. III.] Strangulation BY Bands. 17 may be produced by the very localised peritonitis that is sometimes associated with caseous degeneration of a mesenteric gland. I have met with several re- ported cases, and not a few specimens, that illustrate this circumstance. A single adhesion may readily follow upon the little speck of peritonitis that often attends an intestinal ulcer (Fig, 20). As the ulcer deepens it excites an inflammation over a very limited area of the serous surface. This inflamed spot adheres to some other point on the peritoneum ; a single adhesion forms, which, becoming elongated by the method already described, forms an example of the solitary band. A great many of the cases of " solitary band " described are evidently instances of strangulation by Meckel's diverticulum, or by a diver- ticular ligament. In some few cases there have been two or more false ligaments found in the abdominal cavity. , Some- times these would a})pear to have been produced by the thrusting of a coil of intestine through a broad peritoneal adhesion so as to divide it into two seg- ments. In other instances the bands are inde])endent of one another. Mr. Berkeley Hill reports a case of acute intestinal obstruction where two bands existed, both of which constricted knuckles of small intestine. One constriction was, however, comparatively slight, the other was severe. Laparotomy was performed, and unfortunately the band found and divided was that associated with the minor obstruction. The more serious strangulation was overlooked and the child died. The adhesions in this case appear to have been due to mesenteric gland disease.* The false ligament, although single, may have a complicated arrangement, and lead to extraordinary forms of constriction of the bowel. Thus in the * Lancet, vol. i., 1876, page 773. 1 ^ -1 A< i8 Intestina l Obs tr uc tion. [Chap. III. specimen shown in Fig. 2 "^ there was one isolated adhe- sion. It was, however, broad and Y-shaped ; one end of the Y was attached to the uterus, while the two other ends were connected with points on the small Fig. 2.— strangulation of the Ileum by a Y-sliaped Band attached to the Fundus of the Uterus. The Uterus is shown at the lower part of the figure. intestine about one and a half inches apart. Tliere were many adhesions about the pelvic viscera. In Fig. 3 t it will be seen that an adhesion connecting the * St. Bart.'s Hosp. l\Iuseum, No. 2,164. t Guy's Hosp. Museum, No, 2,507 (50). Chap. III.] Strangulation by Bands, 19 Fig. 3.— Strangulation of tbe Ileum by complicated Bands passing be- tween the Uterus and Ovary. uterus, ovary, and mesentery leads to a complicated form of strangulation and to a double constriction of the bowel. 20 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iii. In many cases of strangulation by a false liga- ment the circumstances of the obstruction are com- plicated by simple adhesions of the same age, and due to the same cause, as the so-called ligament. These adhesions may have matted together into a knuckle the very segment of the bowel that has become strangulated, or may have so attached themselves to the involved intestine as to encourage a volvulus of it wlien beneath the constricting band. The attachments of these peritoneal false liga- ments exhibit the greatest possible variety. To be capable of producing a strangulation of the intestine the band must have at least two points of attach- ment, and there is scarcely any conceivable combina- tion of connected points that is not illustrated in the history of these adhesions. Most commonly the strangulating band is con- nected by one end with the mesentery. In one very frequent variety the band is attached by both its extremities to the mesentery, the points of attach- ment being at a variable distance apart. This disposition of the band is illustrated by Fig. 4,* and it would ajDpear to be very frequently, if not most frequently, due to a limited peritonitis incident upon mesenteric gland disease.t In that very large series of cases where the isolated adhesion is due to pelvic peritonitis, it may be found to be attached by one end to some pelvic viscus, and by the other to a neighbouring part. Thus bands are found passing from the uterus, or ovary, or bladder, to the parietal peritoneum of the pelvis or abdomen ; or, starting from the same source, they may attach themselves to the csecum or sigmoid flexure, or with much greater frequency to some part of the lower ileum or its * University Coll. Museum, No. 1,164. t See specimens St. Bart.'s Hosp. Museum, No. 2,165 ; and Lend. Hosp. Museum, No. Ad. 79. Chap. III.] Strangulation BY Bands. 21 mesentery. In several instances tlie constricting band has merely passed from one point on the pelvic wall to another. When the band has been caused by Pig. 4.— Strangulation of small Intestine by a solitary Band attached at either end to the Mesentery. some local peritonitis in connection with hernia, one of its extremities may be found attached to the vicinity of the femoral or inguinal rings, while the other end may be fixed to the intestine, the mesentery, 22 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. hi. or the posterior parietal peritoneum. When the band has followed after typhlitis (one of the common caiises of false ligaments), both ends of it may be found connected with the csecum, as is apparently the case in a specimen in the College of Surgeons Museum ; "^ or it may pass between the caecum and the peritoneum lining the iliac fossa, or attach itself to the ileum or to its mesentery, or become connected with the lining of the anterior abdominal wall. In some cases, and I think this especially occurs after very localised peritonitis due to intestinal ulcer, a single band passes between two neighbouring coils of intestine. The early stage of such a band is well shown in Fig. 20. Perhaps from the same cause the false ligament may pass from the surface of the bowel to be attached to the mesentery of the piece of intes- tine involved, or to the mesentery of another and possibly distant segment of the gut. Whatever their origin, it must be owned that these last-mentioned forms of band are not uncommon. Among the less usual attachments of these bands may be mentioned the following : Between the descending colon and the mesentery, f Between the mesentery near the caecum, and the anterior surface of the rectum. I Between the transverse colon and the ciecum § (the band in this case occurred in con- nection with extensive adhesions due to peritonitis after ulcer of the stomach). Between the omentum and the mesentery. || Between the ascending and de- scending colon.^ Between the colon and the ovary.** * No. 1,360a. t St. Thomas's Hosp. Museum, No. R 15. t Mr. A7ard; Path. Soc. Trans., 1852, page 302. fDr. Hilton Fagge ; Guy's Hosp. Reports, vol. xiv., 18G9, page 272. II Dr. Hilton Fagge, loc. cit. 11 Seerig. Rust's Magazin fur Heilkunde, band xlvi. ** Rokii'.ansky ; Brit, and For. Med.-Chir. Keview, vol. iii. Chap. III.] Strangulation BY Bands. 23 In not a few cases isolated cords of adhesion are described as passing between the sigmoid fle.xure and distant parts. In this way the flexure has been connected -vs-ith the ccecum, with the mesentery near the ca?ciim, and with the parietal peritoneum in the right iliac fossa. Rokitansky * reports a case of adhesion between the sigmoid flexure and a coil of small intestine in the right hypochondriac region. It is well known that the distended sigmoid flexure may reach the right iliac fossa, or even the right hypochondriac district, and cases like the above may be explained on the assumption that the flexure became greatly distended during the time that the peritonitis was active from which the adhesions were derived. Such distension may readily attend the constipation and intestinal paralysis of peritoneal inflammation. Jlethods of strangukition. — When a portion of the intestine is strangiilated by an isolated peritoneal adhesion the gut will be found to be constricted by one of two ways, 1. It may be strangailated beneath the band as beneath a shallow and narrow arch. 2. It may be snared and constricted by a noose or knot formed by the false ligament itself. 1. Strang-ulation beneath a band can only occur when the band is coDiparatively short, and when it is stretched along a Arm surface. From an examina- tion of some fifteen cases, where the constricting cord is well described, it would appear that its average length in this form of strangulation is about one and a half to two inches. The arch beneath which the implicated bowel passes is variously described as large enough to admit one, two, or three fingers. Larger arches have been formed permitting much intestine to pass beneath them, but these great aper- tures ai^e exceptional in acute cases. Since the cord * Manual of Path. Anatomy (Syd. Soc), vol. ii., 1850. 24 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iii. must be stretched along a firm surface it happens that this form of stransjulation is much more com- monly found about the posterior abdominal parietes than elsewhere. It is often met with about the iliac fossse, especially that of the right side, and about the brim of the true pelvis. When a band passes be- tween two points on the mesentery a coil of small intestine may readily be strangulated beneath it, the resisting pai'ts between which the bowel is com- pressed being the false ligament on the one hand, and the mesentery on the other. It will be readily understood also that a knuckle of the small intestine may be strangulated with little difficulty when it passes between a band and a solid viscus like the uterus. In some few cases the firm basis required for this form of obstruction appears to have been provided by a rigid mass of adhesions, across which the false ligament has been stretched. 2. Strangulation by a noose or knot requires a lonir false liiiament which must lie loose and free in the abdominal cavity, being attached only by its two ends. The snaring of a coil of small intestine by this means must be a matter of some difficulty, and must be almost impossible in cases where the bowel is per- fectly normal. As Leichtenstern has well pointed out, the gvit in these cases will usually be found to have been in an abnormal condition previous to the occurrence of the strangulation. A knuckle of gut may be rendered so adherent that it could not slip out of the way by peristaltic movement when it had be- come involved in the noose or knot. It is probably a still more common circumstance for two ends of a loop of intestine to be matted together by a little Chap. III.] Strangulation BY Bands. 25 mesenterial peritonitis, so that if a noose should slip over such a loop, the constricting cord will find at the Fig. 6. — Strangulation by a Band. (Astlty Cooper.) a, anterior al)clonilnal parietes ; h, hand passing from a lu'vnial sac to surround the intestine ; c, band returning to the hernial sac ; d, loop or noose fonned by the band ; e, intestine strangulated by the noose d ; /, intestine strauguhvted iu a less degree by the portions of the band h and c. base of tJie loop a narrowed neck around which it may take good hold. The most common method whereby a coil of intestine may be snared is when the lax band forms a ring or spiral between its fixed 26 InTES TINA L ObS TR UCTION. [Chap. III. points a and h (Fig. 5). Through this ring a loop of the small intestine slips, or over an abnor- mally fixed coil of that part of the bowel the noose passes. For an excellent illustration of this method see Fig. 6.* Strangulation by the formation of a knot is some- what different from the process of snaring just described. The mechanism of this variety of obstruc- tion is thus described by Leich- tenstern : " There are several kinds of this knotting. The most frequent is the following : The long and loose ligament is fastened at one end to a loop of the small intestine, and hangs in the form of a simple coil (Fig. 7). If the top of the intestinal loop passes directly through the coil c, a simple knot is formed about the piece of the intestine, as is shown in Fig. 8. It is evident that the same result can be produced by the coil being thrown over the top of and around the intestinal loop. " An(;>ther and rarc^r form of knot is made as follows : a long and perfectly loose fcdse ligament forms a simple coil, like that shown in Fig. 5, between its points of attachment a and h. If now one leg of the so-formed primary noose passes tlirough it we have a knot like that shown in Fig. 9, and if now the intestinal loop passes directly through c (Fig. 9), it becomes firmly caught and strangulated. * From Sir Astloy Cooper's Treatise on Abdominal Hernia, plate xxvi., Figs. 2 and 3. Fig. 7. Chap. III.] Strangulation by Bands. 27 . . . . A common characteristic of all described knots is, that when the strangulated intestine is freed tlie ligament can immediately be drawn out straight.""^ With regard to the relative frequency of these two forms of strangulation by band, viz. strangula- tion under the false ligament, and strangulation by a noose or knot, my own collection of cases gives the proportion of the two as about six to one. Leichtenstem, however, who deals with a larger series of instances, has tabulated fifty-six cases of strangulation under the band, and twenty-six by means of knots and snaring. With regard to the amount of intestine that may be involved in a ■^^^* ^* noose or knot, it must be remembered that the false ligament may, under certain circumstances, attain a considerable length. Thus, in Mr. Obre's case already alluded to (page 6), the false ligament was VI \ inches long. Into the precise physical conditions that underlie the production of strangulation in these and in analogous forms of strangulation it is not necessary to enter. Many theories exist upon the subject, and the matter is one rather of pure physics. An excellent account of the mechanism of stran- gulation as applied to hernia has been given by Schmidt,! and an able account of the various theories that exist upon the question has been furnished by Hueier.J To the works of these authors the reader is referred. * Loc. cit., page 528. t Die Unterleibsbriiche, Handb. der Allgem. und Speciel, Chirurgie, Yon Pitlia imd Billroth, 1882, page 146. X Grundriss der Chirurgie, page 248. Leipzig, 1883. 2$ Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. hi. 2. 8traiig:ulatioii by cords formed from the oiiientiim.— These cords are in all cases due to an adhesion or adhesions formed between the omen- tum and some other peritoneal surface as a conse- quence of peritonitis. The form and arrangement of these omental cords show very considerable variety. Sometimes the lower border of the omentum, and probably the central part of that border, becomes adherent at some one sj^ot. As a result the inferior part of the membrane is rolled up into a round solid band, and the whole structure assumes a fan-shaped outline. The base of the fan is at the transverse colon, while its apex or narrowed part is represented ]jy the cord-like extremity of the adherent epiploon. A case of this character is reported by Dr. Hare, the point of adhesion being at the anterior abdominal parictes below the umbilicus."* In a somewhat similar case described by Mr. Avery the extremity of the omentum was twisted into a cord about the size of the little finger, and attached to the mesentery in the right iliac region, f In other cases, especially where one of the lateral borders of the epiploon has become adherent, the attached portion separates as a cord, which becomes in time dense and fibrous. If the omentum has formed extensive adhesions, its whole substance may be changed into a series of cords passing between the transverse colon and various other parts of the abdominal cavity. Such Avas the condition of things, for example, in a case of Dr. Fagge's, the many false ligaments that had formed being attached to the abdominal parietes and small intestines in many * Piitli. Soc. Trans., vol. rii., 1851, page 111. t IVjtd., vol. iv., page 150. A case of a like character will be foiind in a paper by M. Berger, in Bull, et M^m. de la Soc. de Chir. de Paris, tome vi., 1880, page 601. Chap. III.] Omental Cords. 29 places.* In any case the omentum from which a band is dorivcul is often found much altered in struc- ture, having become tliin and reticulate. One of the most curious modes of forming omental bands is met with in a case described by Dr. K. Fowler. Here the epii)loon was divided into two lateral cords, which, coming off from either side of the transverse colon passcnl down behind or among the intestines, and were found to be united togetlier near the pelvis. All the patient's troubles dated from a kick received upon tlie abdomen. It is probabh; tliat in this case a rent had formed in tlie omentum, through which the great bulk of the small intestines had proti'uded. The lateral jxirts of the omentum, i.e. the parts on either side of the rent, had then shrunken into cord-like masses, which would be more or less hidden by the bowels. Dr. Hilton Fagge has put upon record an almost similar case in his monograph in the Guy's Hospital Keports. When once a portion of the epiploon has become adherent the development of the attached part into a ligamentous cord is to be explained by the same process that fashions a broad ribbon-like adhesion into a fibrous thread. The segment of the adherent omentum is continually being dragged upon, espe- cially when attached to a movable viscus ; it tends to become elongated, while the rolling movements of the bowels around it help to mould it into a rounded cord-like ligament. {See page G.) As a rule the omental cords are much coarser and thicker than are the bands resulting from peritoneal adhesions. Many are nearly as thick as the finger, while only a few are described as being very fine. In the matter of length they usually have an advantage over the simple band, as may be expected from the dimensions and relations of the great omentum. * Guy's Hosp. Keports, loc. cit. 30 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iii. The point of attachment of the epiploic band will obviously depend upon the situation of the peritonitis that renders it adherent. Such adhesion may follow after any form of peritoneal inflammation from which a patient recovers. It may be due to a limited peritonitis following injury, as in Mr. Avery's case mentioned above, where the attachment was close to a slit in the mesentery, the result of violence. Pelvic peritonitis may lead to adhesions in and about the pelvis, and from this cause the omentum has been found con- nected with the uterus or the ovaries. In like manner typhlitis has led to attachments to the csecum and to the peritoneum in the iliac fossa. In other and less well defined instances the abnormal attach- ment has been found upon the mesentery and upon the free surface of the small intestine. Undoubtedly, however, the most common cause of omental adhesion is some peritonitis set up about a hernia, and espe- cially about a femoral hernia."* The frequency with which omentum is found in the latter form of rupture is well known, as is also its disposition to become adherent when once so herniated. Thus it happens that the most frequent point for the attachment of an omental band is in the vicinity of the femoral ring. Since the omentum lies more to the left than to the right side of the abdomen, omental hemise are more common upon the left side, and it is therefore about the hernial orifices to the left of the middle line that the omental cords are more usually attached. One of the least common aspects of the epiploic cord is shown in a specimen in St. Thomas's Hospital Museum, in which it will be seen that the cord passes merely from one part of the great omentum to another. * Portions of omentum attached to umbilical herniae rarely, if ever, form actual cords. Chap. III.] Meckel^ s Diverticulum. 31 While, as above stated, only one peritoneal false ligament is usually found in a given instance, the omental adhesions may be met with in the form of two or even more cords. In the case of epiploic adhesions also two cords may Ije found apparently constricting the bowel at different points, and in per- forming laparotomy for the relief of such obstruction the wrong band may be divided. This circumstance happened to Mr. Bryant. He had divided an omental band attached to the left ovary that appeared to be obstructing the gut, but at the autopsy a second cord was found connected with the uterus, beneath which was a coil of ileum tightly strangulated.* The modes of strangulation by omental cords are identical with those described in connection with peritoneal bands, although it would appear that the proportion of cases of strangulation by a noose or knot is greater in the former than in the latter class of adhesion. This circumstance is no doubt due to the greater average length, and the greater mobility of the omental false ligament, f 3. Strangrulation by Meckel's diverticii- lum. — The true or Meckel's diverticulum is due to the persistence or incomplete obliteration of the vitel- line duct. When met with in its most perfect condi- tion it exists as a tube, having a structure similar to that of the small intestine itself, that extends between the lower part of the ileum and the umbilicus. The abdominal end of the tube opens into the lumen of the lesser bowel, while the umbilical extremity may be closed, or may open upon the surface and permit of the discharge of fsecal matter. I have myself met with two cases where such discharge took place. Once in a lad, aged seventeen, who had been troubled since birth with the occasional escape of fseces from a * St. Thomas's Hosp. Museum, No. E, 14. t LoMcet, vol. ii., 1873, page 773. 32 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. hi. sinus at the navel, and once in a male infant a few weeks old, wliere a like condition existed, and upon whom I successfully performed a plastic operation for the closure of the abnormal passage. This condition, however, of the diverticle is com- paratively rare. Most commonly it exists as a blind tube coming oft' from the ileum. The length of this tube is on an average three inches, and in the great majority of the examples the measurement extends between one inch and four. Sometimes it exists only as a nipple-like projection.* On the other hand cases are recorded where the diverticle, in the form of a free tube, attained the length of ten inches. As a rule the abnormal tube is cylindrical in shape, with a conical extremity. In nearly every instance the intestinal end of the diverticulum is larger than its opposite extremity. In no case, as far as T am aware, has it been seen to assume a polypoid form, and present a comparatively narrow attachment. In diameter its base is usually less than that of the gut from whence it arises, although sometimes the dia- meters of the two tubes may be nearly identical.! It may retain the same width throughout, and thus resemble a glove finger. Much more frequently, how- ever, its free extremity is considerably narrower than its base. In structure the diverticulum is composed of all the layers of normal small intestine. Its mucous membrane is smooth, and possesses Lieberkiihn's follicles. It often presents also a Peyer's patch (Cazin). The muscular coat is sometimes deficient at the apex of the diverticle, and at this spot, therefore, hernial protiusions of the mucous membrane under the serous coat are not infrequently met with. * Guy's Hosp. Museum, No. 1,819 (45). t For an instance of a very wide diverticulum sec specimen No. 1.819 (50), in Guy's Hosp. Museum. Chap. III.] Meckel's Djverticulu.u. 33 When this occurs the extremity of the abnormal tube presents an ampulla of globular shape, and the process is said to be " clubbed." In one dried j)roparation in the London Hospital Museum the ampulla at the end of a diverticulum has so peculiar an outline that the whole process, which is of no great length, looks hammer-shaped. The clubbed extremity of the diverticulum, when it exists, takes an important part in the production of strangulation by knotting. In cases where the diverticulum appears as a compara- tively immense pouch there is little doubt but that the process has been exposed to a considerable degree of distension. Cazin figures a case where a species of valve or diaphragm existed between the diverticulum and the intestine."^ Meckel alludes to a similar arrangement. The diverticulum is always single, and arises from the ileum from one to three feet above the ileo-ca3cal valve. It is extremely rare for the process to take origin beyond these limits. Cazin, however, alludes to a case where it is said to have arisen from the ileum, twenty lines from the cascum. In a specimen in Guy's Hospital Museum f the process is described as springing from the middle of the ileum. The process may come off at an acute angle with the long axis of the bowel, but more usually the angle formed is a right angle. It is sometimes provided with a scanty mesentery, as is shown in a drawing by Sandifort. The end of the diverticulum is, in the majority of cases, free. Very often, however, it is continued in the form of a solid cord. This cord should be attached to the umbilicus or to the abdominal parietes immediately below that cicatrix. | This attachment * Etude sur les Diverticules de I'lntestin. Paris, 1862. t No. 1,819 (50). + St. Bart.'s Hosp. Museum, No. 2,168, and many other speci- mens. D— 12 34 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. hi. is, indeed, very frequently met with. Often tlie cord is pervious for a little way, and presents a minute canal into which a bristle may be inserted. This diverticular ligament may break from its attachment to the parietes and may float free within the ab- dominal cavity. Under such circumstances, however, it is much more usual for it to acquire fresh adhesions to some point of the peritoneal surface. These secondary adhesions of a free diverticulum, or of a diverticular cord at the extremity of one of the processes, are of considerable importance in the etiology of strangulation of the intestine. It is by the diverticulum that has acquired a fresh point of attachment that constriction of the bowel is most often effected. It is, in the great majority of cases, to the mesentery that the tube or the cord continued from it is adherent."^ This adhesion may be found on a portion of the mesentery above the origin of the diverticulum, but somewhat more frequently it is on the mesentery of tlie ileum between the point of origin of the process and the caecum. The loop formed by such an adhesion presents the greatest possible variety. When the diverticulum is very small and short, the ring that it forms is quite insignificant, and incapable of engaging more than a slight portion of the intestine. f When, however, the * In twenty-three cases collected by Cazin the points of attachment of the diverticulum were as follows • To colon 1 To mesentery ... ... 10 23 Near umbilicus ... ... 3 Near inguinal ring ... ... 1 To small gut G To caecum ... ... ... 2 In nineteen additional cases collected by myself the attach ments were as follows : Near umbilicus ... ... 7 To femoral rin^ ... ... 1 To small gut 3 To caecum 1 t Guy's Hosp. Museum, No. 1,819 (36) To mesentery ... ... 7 19 Chap. III.] Meckel's Diverticulum. 35 process is long, and especially when it ends in an elongated cord or ligament, a loop of considerable size may be formed, and nooses and knots may be developed capable of snaring many coils of the bowel.* In other cases the diverticle or diverticular cord is attached to some other part of the small intestine or to the omentum, or to some point on the ab- dominal parietes other than the immediate vicinity of the umbilicus. In many instances it is evident that the site of the adhesion has been influenced by some definite form of localised peritonitis. Thus the extremity of the diverticulum has been found attached to the pelvic viscera or pelvic parietes after peritoneal inflammation in that region, to the caecum or peritoneum about the right iliac fossa after typh- litis, and to the vicinity of the femoral and inguinal canals after hernia. In some specimens the peri- tonitis causing the adhesion has evidently been set up by mesenteric gland inflammation. In another series of cases the diverticulum does not exist as such, but is replaced in its entire length by a fibrous cord identical in aspect with the band so often seen attached to the apex of the tubular pro- cess. These cords may be found to extend between the parietes in the vicinity of the umbilicus and that part of the ileum from which the more familiar diverticle takes origin. They may be considered to represent an entirely obliterated diverticulum, or may be the remains of persisting omphalo-mesenteric vessels.! A case belonging to the latter category has been placed on record by I)r. Mahomed. In this instance a fibrous band extended from tbe middle of the anterior abdominal wall (midway between the pubes and the umbilicus) to the right iliac fossa. The *Patli. Soc. Traus., vol. xxi., page 185. ^ See an exhaustive paper on Persistent Omphalo-Mes. Ra mains, by Dr. Fitz ; Amer. J. of Med. Sc, July, 1884. 36 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. hi. deeper extremity of the cord had snared in a noose a large portion of ileum. It then attached itself to the mesentery, some three feet from the ileo-csecal valve, and was found to be continuous with a branch of the ileo-colic artery. The more superficial ex- tremity of the band divided, one part ascending to the navel with the obliterated hypogastric artery, the other descending to form the left superior vesical artery. The cord was quite impervious to injection.* These diverticular ligaments may break loose from their connections at the umbilicus, and may, like the tubular processes, either remain free in the abdominal cavity, or form secondary adhesions at almost any spot. To still further complicate this matter, the cord may retain its attachment to the anterior abdominal wall, and separate from its connection with the intestine. It may then either form no other attachment, or may adhere to a point somewhere within the abdomen, f Finally, a cord may be found to stretch from the root of the mesentery to be attached to the margin of the ileum (close to its mesentery) opposite the spot from which the diverticle most commonly arises. Leichtenstem believes that such bands rejiresent that part of tho omphalo-mesenteric vessels that extends between the bowel and the main blood-vessels at the root of the mesentery. He gives a figure to show the continuation of this band with an ordinary diverticu- lum which is attached by a cord to the umbilicus. A false ligament described by Dr. David King may possibly have been of this nature. This band, which was an eighth of an inch in diameter, passed from the upper part of the root of the mesentery to a point on the small intestine. Beneath it a piece of bowel liad become strangulated, t * Path. Soc. Trans., vol. xxvi., page 47. t Spangenberg, Arch. f. Phys. v., Sleckel, b. v., s. 87. + St. Bart.'s Hosp. Reports, vol. xvii., 1881, page 277. Chap. Ill] Meckei^s Diverticulum. 37 Tliere can be little doubt but that these strangely attached diverticular ligaments have often been mistaken for isolated peritoneal adhesions ; and, in any case, where a " solitary band " exists without a trace of ancient peritonitis, there are some prima- facie grounds for suspecting the cord to be of con- genital origin. The diverticulum, as already stated, is always single. The same remark applies, with but few exceptions, to the diverticular ligaments. In a few instances the cord seems to have divided, so that an appearance as of two bands has been produced. Such is apparently the case in a specimen in one of the museums,* in which one ligament encircles a loop of bowel and strangulates it, while the other goes to be attached to the vicinity of the femoral ring. It may be here mentioned that a free true diver- ticulum has in several instances been found in an external hernia. One of the earliest cases of this kind is described by Littre. f In this case a diverticle four inches in length was found in a scrotal hernia in a man aged 48. It is evident that Littre was unaware of the nature of the intestinal pouch. | Cazin gives a drawing to show a Meckel's diverticu- lum in a scrotal hernia from a case dissected by himself § Methods of 'producing strangulation. — 1. A coil of small intestine may be strangulated beneath an adherent diverticulum precisely in the same manner as it would be when beneath a peritoneal adhesion. * St. Bart.'s Hosp. Museum, No. 2,173. t Mem. de I'Acad. dee Sciences, 1700, page 300, ''Observat. sur una nouvelle Espece de Hernie. " + A full account of the relation of the diverticulum to hernia will be found in " Du Pincement Herniare de I'lntestin," by M. Loviot. Paris, 1879. § Loc. cit., Fig. 14. See also case by Busch, Central, fiir Chirurg., 1884, No. 23, page 69. 38 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. in. An illustration of this mode of constricting the bowel is shown in Fig. 10, from a case reported by M. Rayer.^ It is scarcely possible to conceive that this method of producing obstruction can occur when the diverticulum simply extends between the ileum and the anterior abdominal wall. fYet several cases are recorded ^ where the diverticulum ha,d these attachments, and where it is vaguely stated that beneath the process some bowel was strangu- lated. In the absence of clearer evidence these cases must be accepted with some little doubt. '^'^W'an adt'^DWez- Certainly, in nearly all reported tide. (Kayer.) instances of Strangulation under "'"end'oTgiuf^^J'ionrrf'; ^ diverticulum, the process has stonguiatud'ioop.^' ^^"^ been adherent to a point other than the vicinity of the um- bilicus. When the adhesion is to the mesentery, as is so frequently the case, it will be readily under- stood that beneath the arcade so formed a loop of intestine may be with great ease engaged and com- pressed. This condition of the parts is often met with. 2. A diverticular ligament, whetlier attached to the extremity of a pouch-like process, or (in the absence of such process) connected directly with the gut, may form precisely the same kinds of noose and knot as are formed by isolated adhesions. The length and looseness of the congenital ligament render it well able to snare the bowel, provided that the position and circumstances of the bowel render it capable of being snared. The strangulation of a loop of intestine by the simple noose or spiral, depicted on page 24, would * Archiv. Gen , do Med. , tome v. , page 68. Chap. III.] Meckel^ s Diver tic ul um. 39 appear to be fairly common in the case of diverticular cords. The numerous specimens found in museums, where these cords are seen to have made one and a half or two turns round the involved bowel, are Fig. 11.— Strangulation by Meckel's Diverticulum. a, point of origin of diverticle. The distal end is attached to the mesentery. The loop involved measured 12 inches. probably of this character. An example of this variety of strangulation in its simplest form is depicted in Fig. 11."^ In some instances the band will be seen to have passed twice round the bowel at the point of constriction.! Iii other specimens one * Lond. Hosp. Museum, No. Ag. 2. t For specimens see St. Bart.'s Hosp. Museum, No. 2,172, and University Coll. Museum, No. 1,167. 40 Intestinal Csstruction. [Chap. hi. and a half turns are made. A reference to the drawing taken from Sir Astley Cooper's work (Fig. G), will show the manner whereby the gut is snared in these nooses, and will also explain how in constriction by a simple spiral an appearance is pro- duced as of a cord passing one and a half or two times round the bowel. Very often the strangulation by a noose is a little more complicated. In a case reported by Dr. Bristowe, * the spiral, although simple in itself, was yet so arranged around the intestinal coils as to compress them in four different places. In a case recorded by Moscati,t the diver- ticular band formed a definite figure of 8 loop in which the intestinal coils were so involved as to be constricted in three places. What mechanism is involved in producing these extraordinary forms of obstruction, and what movements of the bowel and what arrangement of the band are requisite, must be at present a matter of pure speculation. The relative frequency of the two forms of strangulation already described, viz. under the band and by the noose or knot, is represented by Leichten- stern, by the figures 40 and 14 in a total of 54 cases. These figures are a little difficult to understand, if taken in connection with the experience gained by an examination of all the specimens to be found in the various museums of London. These specimens cer- tainly appear to show that strangulation by snaring is by no means uncommon, and that this form of ob- struction does not bear to the constrictions under the band so wide a proportion as 1 to 4. If one could judge from an inspection of museum specimens only, it would seem that stranijulation under the diverticular band is only about twice as frequent as is the more comj)licated method of obstruction. According to * Path. Soc. Trans., vol. xxi., page 185. t Mem. de I'Acad. de Chiiurg., tome iii., page 468. Chap. III.] Meckel's Diverticulum. 41 Leichtens tern's figures, strangulation by the noose is relatively more frequent in the case of the peritoneal adhesion than it is in the case of the congenital band. This fact also is in direct opposition to the conclusions derived from the museum sj)ecimens, and I am strongly inclined to believe that obstruction by snaring is relatively more frequent when the diverticulum is concerned than when the trouble is brought about by the false ligament. This latter conclusion is one that would be anticipated if the gi*eater average length and the greater mobility of the diverticular ligament be borne in mind. 3. Strangulation hy knots formed hy a free diver- ticulum. — These remarkable knots and the methods of their formation have been very exhaustively studied by M. Parise.* To produce these knots it is neces- sary that the diverticulum should be of good length, should be quite free (save only for its intestinal attachment), and should possess an ampulla at its extremity. The importance of the ampulla is para- mount, and French writers are in the habit of speaking of it as la clef de Vetranglement. Three varieties of knot may be described : a. The diverticle forms a ring into which its own free end projects (Fig. 12). A loop of intestine entering the centre of that ring will push the clubbed end of the process before it and so tie the knot by which the coil becomes obstructed. h. The diverticulum surrounds the pedicle of an intestinal loop in such a way as to encii'cle it with a simple knot. The mode of formation of the noose is Fig. 12. shown in Fig. 13, Of this variety M. E,egnault gave many years ago an excellent example. The diverticle was in this case six inches in *Bull. cle I'Acad. de Med., tome xvi., page 373k 42 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. in. length, and by its means one and a half feet of intestine were strangulated. c. In this form two loops of the bowel are involved (Fig. 14), one above, a, and the other below, 6, the origin of the diverticulum, d. One of the loops Fig. 13.— One mode of Strangulation by the Diverticulum. (Kegnault- B^clard.) fl, origin of diverticle ; 6, its clubbed extremity. enters the knot by a preliminary rotation (" anse rotatoire "), e, the other, is noosed by the diver- ticulum, as in the simple knot (" anse nodale ") c. There appears to have been only one case recorded of this species of knot.* The commonest form of knot is undoubtedly the second of the three now given. Diverticula and diverticular ligaments may lead to other forms of obstruction which do not, however, * " Observat. d'une nouvelle Forme d'Etrang. dite par Noeud iutestinab" by Dr. M. Levy ; Gazette Medicale, 1845, page 129. Chap. III.] Meckel's Diverticulum. 43 come under the present category. These forms may be enumerated here for the sake of completeness, and will be dealt with in detail in subsequent paragraphs. 4. Strangulation over a divei'ticular hand. — In this form a loop of intestine is thrown over a tightly drawn diverticular band as a shawl is thrown over the arm. Under certain conditions, which need not be here detailed, an obstruc- tion follows in the bowel so displaced. The occlusion is some- what similar to that that would take place in a coil of thin india- rubber tubing, if thrown across a a tense wire cord and allowed to Fig. 14. — strangi^lation ■ITT, by tlie Diverticulum become dependent. ^ \,y a double Kuot. 6. Strangulation hy kinking. — If, under certain circumstances, much traction be brought to bear on a diverticular ligament, the gut, without undergoing any structural alteration, may l)ecome so acutely bent at the point of origin of the abnormal band or process as to be occluded. It has been shown also that a free diverticulum, when of good size, and coming off at about a right angle with the bowel, may cause such bending of the bowel, when the pouch is much distended, as to cause obstruc- tion. 6. Strangulation hy the effects of traction. — In these cases the bowel at the point of origin of the diverticle undergoes certain gross structural changes which may, in time, bring about intestinal obstruction. There is evidence to show that these changes result from long continued traction upon the bowel, brought about by means of an adherent diverticular process. It may be noted that foreign bodies that have been swallowed, and intestinal concretions of various kinds, may lodge within the pouch-like diverticula, and excite 44 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap, in, in them ai\ inflammation of like character and like tendencies to that set up in the vermiform appendix by identical substances. One effect of the true diverticulum in producing intestinal obstruction is illustrated by a specimen in Guy's Hospital Museum, that is, so far as I am aware, unique. In this case a short finger-like diverticulum had become inverted, had projected into the lumen of the intestine and had led to the forma- tion of an intussusception."^ In order of frequency the various methods of producing obstruction by the diverticulum may bo arranged as follows : (1) By strangulation under the diverticulum'; (2) by loops or nooses; (3) by diverticular knots. Ijeiclitenstern's figures for these three varieties are 40. 1 4, and 1 2. Strangulation over a band or by kinking, and obstruction from the effects of long- continued traction, are all comparatively rare. False diverticula. — It will be convenient to take note here of certain acquired diverticula that may. under some circumstances, be possibly confused with the congenital variety. In all essential points, in structure, in position, and in nimiber, these diverticula differ entirely from Meckel's process. They are simply hernial protrusions of the mucous membrane of the bowel through the muscular coat, and hence the common name " distension diverticula." In structure they are composed simply of mucous membrane and peritoneum. They present in their walls no muscular fibres. The lining mucous mem- brane in the smaller pouches is quite normal, but in the larger diverticula that membrane becomes atro- phied and its glandular structures tend to disappear. They may be met with in any part of the bowel, but are somewhat more often found in the large than in * Guy's Hosp. Museum, No. 1,819 (45). Chap. III.] False Dij'erticula. 45 the small intestine. They have been seen in the duodenum, are comparatively common in the jejunum, and are encountered with still greater frequency in the ileum. They may appear in any part of the colon, but are most common in the sigmoid flexure and rectum. In the matter of numbers they show the greatest variety, and are far more frequently multiple than smgle. The chief examples of midtiple diverticula are met with in the large intestine. Alibert couuted two hundred in one colon. In the museum of St. Thomas's Hospital is a sigmoid flexure, the whole surface of which is studded with a multitude of little hernial pouches, varying in size from a pin's head to a marble. Pig. 15, from Sir Astley Cooper's work on hernia, shows a jejunum, along the mesenteric border of which distension diverticula are crowded almost as closely as they can lie. The chief examples of single pouches are met with in the lesser bowel. Thus Dr. Bristowe has reported an instance of a single diverticulum no larger than j^io. 15^ a horse-bean, situated in the ileum just above the ileo-caecal valve."^ In other cases only two pouches were found in the small intestine, as in an instance noted by Dr. Hilton Fagge, where the abnormal sacs were both in the jejunum. f In size, the false diverticulum may also show any dimensions between that of a pin's head and that of a large apple. In sha]>e they are usually globular, especially when small. | When of larger size they may become lobulated, as is the case with one of the *Path. Soc Trans., vol. vi., page 191. t Ibid. , vol. xxvii. , page 147. j Guy's Hosp. Museum, No. 1,819 (69). 46 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. in. Fig. 16.— False Diverticula. Chap. III.] False Diverticula, 47 diverticula shown in Fig. 16.* It is extremely rare for them to assume the conical shape or finger-] ike outline so commonly met with in Meckel's diverticula. They are usually narrower at the attached extremity than at the fundus, and are apt, when of good size, to assume a polypoid outline. As regards the relation of these hernial pouches to the intestinal wall, it will be found that in the lesser bowel they invariably appear along the mesenteric border of the gut, and force their way, as they en- large, between the two layers of the mesentery. In the colon they are usually met with on those parts of the intestine to which the appendices epiploicae are attached, and into the substance of these appendages the pouch will, as a rule, be found to have projected. This relation of the diverticulum to the appendices was admirably shown in the case reported by Dr. Bristowe. It is probable that all these pouches are due to distension, and may be regarded as hernise of the mucous membrane through the muscular coat. They occur, with but few exceptions, in old people ; and those of the colon are usually associated with a his- tory of chronic constipation. In the small intestine, also, the diverticula are as a rule attended with con- ditions bringing about great distension of the bowel. In Sir Astley Cooper's case the pouches were in the jejunum, while in the ileum was an obstruction of slio-ht character, that had no doiibt encouragfed a Ions:- continued distension of the intestine. In several other instances the protrusions were met with in patients who had sufiered from hernia, the diverticula being situated in a part of the bowel above that in- volved in the rupture. Of the exact pathology of these little pouches it must be confessed that very little is known. If they are due to distension it is * Coll. of Surgeons Museum, No. 1,177. 48 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. hi. difficult to understand why they are not met with more frequently in cases of acute and chronic intes- tinal obstruction. In such cases they are indeed, with the exceptions above named, practically un- known. The formation of one diverticulum as a result of localised distension is not difficult to under- stand, but in those cases in which several continuous feet of the bowel present these pouches, conditions are involved that have certainly not yet been interpreted. Over and over again the gut is found at an autopsy enormously distended, sometimes in its entire length, sometimes in a limited segment, and yet no diver- ticula are present, although the distension may have been so extreme as to rupture the serous coat. I have only been able to find one reported case of a false diverticulum in a child. The case ^ reported by Dr. Piatt, "^ and presents some extraordinary features. The patient was a little girl aged nine. The autopsy showed that she had a stricture of the small intestine, due probably to the contraction of a tubercular ulcer. This stricture had become plugged by a hard faecal mass, and the child presented the symptoms of acute obstruction. On examination by the rectum a soft elastic tumour was felt pressing upon the anterior wall of the bowel. At its lower extremity was an orifice like an os uteri, into which the finger could be introduced. This was supposed to be the orifice of an invaginated piece of bowel, and the case was presumed to be one of intussusception. The autopsy showed that there was no invagination of any part of the gut, and the tumour proved to be a false diverticulum of the rectum, into the orifice of which the finger had been introdiiced in the rectal examination. In no case, I believe, has the distension diverticu- lum caused an intestinal obstruction. A specimen in * Lancet, vol. i., 1873, page 42. Chap. III.] False Diverticula. 49 the Guy's Hospital Museum* shows an intussuscep- tion in the immediate vicinity of such a pouch, and from the condition of the parts there is every reason to believe that the diverticulum was antecedent to the obstruction. The connection, however, between the two might have been purely accidental. These pouches, and especially those of the colon, are apt to lodge little faecal masses and foreign matters of various kinds. Inflammation of the pouch may be induced by such lodgment, and peritonitis from perforation result, just as occurs in the appendix vermiformis. Notice has already been drawn to the fact that the colic diverticula are apt to project into appendices epiploicae ; and it is quite probable that in those cases where such an appendix has caused an isolated adhesion a pouch might have formed in the appendage, have lodged a foreign substance of some kind, and have been, in consequence, the seat of a limited peritonitis. Thus, Mr. Hulke records a case where an epiploic appendage was adherent to the pelvic perito- neum near the right sciatic notch. Beneath the arcade so formed a loop of bowel had been strangu- lated. The appendix was on the sigmoid flexure, which extended in an angular loop across the pelvis. f In a specimen in the College of Surgeons Museum it will be seen that an appendix has become adherent to the omentum in such a way as to cause stenosis of the part of the colon from which it arose. In this case tlie comparatively large size of the involved appendix is conspicuous. | I have found two cases on record where a false diverticulum in the sigmoid flexure communicated witli the interior of the bladder by an ulcerated open- ing. Here also it is probable that inflammation was * Guy's Hosp. Museum, No. 1,849 (10). "^ Medical Times and Gazette, vol. iL, 1872, page 482. + O0II. of Surgeons Museum, No. 1,362. E— 12 5© Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. hi. excited in the pouch by the lodgment of a fsecal mass ; by the peritonitis set up the process became adherent to the bladder, and by the extension of ulceration from the diverticulum the bladder was perforated. * One of the patients passed faecal matter by the urethra, while the other f seems to have been more troubled by the escape of urine into the rectum. 4. Strangrulatioii by normal structures abnormally attached. A. The vermiform appendix may become adherent to some point on the neighbouring peritoneum, and so form a band or arch beneath which a loop of intestine may be strangulated. The process is very commonly adherent to the mesentery of the lower ileum. J Less frequently it is adherent to the ileum itself,§ or to the caecum, or to the peritoneum about bhe right iliac fossa and margin of the pelvis. In one instance, reported by Sir Risdon Bennet, the appendix was adherent to an enlarged ovary on the right side, and beneath the cord so formed a loop of the ileum and a part of the ascending colon were constricted. || In some rare cases the appendix has been described as wound in the form of a close spiral, or of a ring into which a loop of intestine has entered and has become strangulated. In other instances, equally uncommon, the appendix is said to have tied itself into an actual knot of a character similar to those sometimes formed by the true diverticulum. By such a knot the bowel has been constricted. It must be confessed that this last-mentioned form of obstruction is a little difficult to credit. The ♦Path. Soc. Trans., vol. x., page 131 ; Mr. Sydney Jones. + Ibid. , vol. X. , page 208 ; Mr. Charles Hawkins. t Guy's Hosp. Museum, No. 2,508 (50). % See a good case by Mr. Gay; Path. Soc. Trans., vol. iii., page 101. II Path. Soc. Trans., vol. iv., page 146. The specimen is now in St. Thomas's Hosp. Museum, No. R 17. Chap. III.] Fixed Mesentery. 5.1 average length of the appendix is three inches. It is often four or five inches, and has been found to reach and even exceed the length of eight inches. B. In several instances the Fallopian tube has be- come adherent to some part of the neighbouring peritoneum, to that, for example, lining one of the iliac fossae, and beneath the arcade so formed a portion of the small intestine has been strangulated.* 0. A few cases are reported where a loop of bowel has been strangulated beneath a band formed by a fixed portion of the 'mesentery. In these ex- amples some coils of the small intestine become fixed at a distant spot. They may be involved in a large irreducible hernia, or may have hung down into the pelvis, and acquired adhesions when in that position. Under such circumstances the corresponding part of the mesentery may become tightly stretched across the posterior wall of the abdomen or the pelvic brira, and a bridge be thus formed beneath which some of the lesser bowel may become strangulated, f Du- chaussoy appears to be of opinion, that when a large coil of the ileum simply hangs down into the pelvis, the arch then formed by the mesentery may be of such a character that intestine can be obstructed beneath it. Such a circumstance, however, must be extremely exceptional, in the absence of any adhesions holding the dependent bowel in place. In cases of acute obstruction it is common enough to find all the coils of small intestine below the point of strangula- tion hanging in a bunch empty and collapsed into the pelvis. If we except these cases, however, there must be very few conditions met with where large *For cases see Bull. Soc. Anat, de Paris, 1841, page 209, by M. Gaubric ; and Archiv. Gen. de Med., 1829, by M. Rostun. ^ See case by Dr. Hilton Fagge (Guy's Hosp. Reports, vol. xiv,), where the Heiim was adherent to a tumour formed by an extra uterine fcetation, while beneath its tensely drawn mesentery some jejunum was strangulated. 52 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. hi. coils of the bowel hang listlessly in the pelvis, and so form from the mesentery a band sufficiently long abiding to allow gut to be compressed beneath it. When such dependent coils are fixed or adherent the mechanism of the obstruction is quite intelligible. D. To the bands formed by adherent appendices epiploicce allusion has already been made (page 49). E. Dr. Hilton Fagge has recorded the case of a woman aged seventy-four, who died vdth symptoms of acute intestinal obstruction that had lasted for six days. The autopsy revealed a portion of the ileum strangulated by the pedicle of a large ovarian cyst. On moving the tumour a little the obstructed bowel was easily reduced.* 5. StrangnlatJon throug'h slits and aper- tures. A. Slits and apertures in the mesentery. — Through holes formed in this membrane portions of intestine have frequently been strangulated. The holes are usually slit-like, and are most common in the mesentery of the lower ileum. In other parts they are rare. In many cases these slits can be more or less distinctly traced to an injury, and several specimens in the museums of London show that a limited rent of the mesentery may be the only visible lesion after violence applied to the abdomen. In other cases there is every reason to believe that the abnormal aperture is congenital. The edges in such instances are smooth, rounded, and regular ; there is no history of injury and no trace of any previous peritonitis. In one case the upper margin of the slit appieared as a dense and distinct band containing in its substance a large branch from the superior mesenteric artery, f The hole is usually situated near to the intestine. * Guy's Hosp. Eeports, vol. xiv. t Contrib. a I'fitude de I'Occlusion Intest., by M. Le Moyne. Paris, 1878. Chap. III.] Omental Apertures. 53 In size it shows great variation. It may be no larger than a sixpenny piece,"^ or it may be extensive enough to admit four fingers, f In the last-mentioned in- stance the portion of bowel involved was the sigmoid flexure, and so far as I can ascertain this is the only case on record where colon has found its way into the slit. Mr. Partridge has recorded a case, which is probably unique, of strangulation of a knuckle of ileum through an aperture in the mesentery of the vermiform appendix. \ In a few instances the strangulation has occurred through slits in the transverse and descending meso-colon. B. Slits and apertures in the omentum. — An example of this form of obstruction is shown in Fig. 17. § These slits may be due to congenital defect, but in many instances they can be distinctly traced to an injury. M. Le Fort reports the case of a young man who developed symptoms of intestinal obstruction some little while after having received a kick on the abdomen from a horse. The autopsy showed two hernise of portions of the small intestine through two slits in the great omentum. || In speaking of omental bands allusion has already been made to the circumstance that as a result of violence a mass of intestines may protrude through an immense rent in the omentum, and the two divisions of the membrane thus formed may develop into omental bands. C Less common forms of slit. — Mr. Holmes has placed on record a remarkable case, where a loop of *Dr. Leared ; Path. Soc. Trans., vol. xiv., page 156. + M. Tr^lat ; Bull, et Mem. de la Soc. de CMr. de Paris, tome vi , 1880, page 594. tPath. Soc. Trans., vol. xii., page 110. §University Coll. Museum, No. 1,161. See also specimen in St. Bai-t.'s Hosp. Museum, No. 2,177. II Bull, et Mem. de la Soc. de Chir. de Paris, tome v., 1869, page 635. 54 InTES TINA L ObS TR UC TION, [Chap. III. the lower ileum was strangulated througli a hole apparently formed in an appendix epiploica. The appendix in question was attached to the sigmoid flexure and formed a fatty fibrous ring through which the loop had passed. There were several large and Fig. 17. — Strangulation of small Intestine tLrough a Hole in the Great Omentum. broad appendices upon the same segment of the colon, some of which were perforated near their bases, as if they also were capable of developing into rings.* It may be that the appearance of a ring had been brought about by two adjacent appendices becoming adherent at their extremities. Dr. Quain describes * Path. See. Trans., vol. xii., page 3. Chap. III.] Sl/ts and Aperturrs. 55 an autopsy where forty inches of the ileum wen^ found to have passed through a slit in the broad ligament of the uterus. In this case, however, the gut was also held down by a band of old adhesions.* Barth reports a case of strangulation of the intestine in a slit in the suspensory ligament of the liver, f The small intestine has not infrequently been found to have passed through the foramen of Winslow, and Leichtenstern has collected three cases where the gut so placed became strangulated by the margins of the aperture. In by no means a few instances a coil of intestine has been contracted by passing through a slit formed in a broad membranous adhesion. In other cases the bowel has protruded between two cord-like adhesions placed close together and parallel with one another. Mr. Hutchinson mentions an instance where the slit was formed between a false ligament and the edge of the broad ligament of the uterus, by the side of which the adhesion ran. \ In some cases rings and slits have been formed between intestinal loops that have become matted together, and through these apertures a non-adherent coil has passed and become constricted. In one case, briefly mentioned by Sir Astley Cooper, it was found that " two folds of intestine had adhered at one point only (as may be represented by bringing the points of the thumb and finger in contact) ; through the noose thus formed, another fold of intestine was passed and had become strangulated." § The occa- sional gaps and slits that may be formed between adherent intestines, and the viscus or parietes to which they are attached, may serve as holes through which a coil of bowel may pass and be constricted. *Patli. Soc. Trans., vol. xii., page 103. t Schmidt's Jalirb., b. 96, s. 207. % Med. Times and Gazette, 1858. § Abdominal Hernia, chap. xxs.v. 56 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. hi. Into the complicated subject of internal hernise there is no occasion to enter in this work. Of the numerous varieties described, one only is at all common, the diaphragmatic form ; and diaphragmatic hernia, it must be owned, has little to do either clinically or pathologically with intestinal obstruction. Of the other varieties, such as the hernia meso- colica, the hernia intrailiaca, the hernia intersigmoidea, and the like, it need only be said that they are very rare, that they become the seat of a strangulation still more rarely, and that whether strangulated or not strangulated, they cannot be diagnosed during life. Should the portion of intestine that they contain become constricted, the symptoms induced would be similar to those of strangulation under a band, while the treatment of the two cases would be practically identical. RELATIVE FREQUENCY OF THE VARIOUS FORMS OF STRANGULATION DEPENDING UPON BANDS, APER- TURES, ETC. The seven most common forms met with under this heading may be arranged in the following order of frequency : 1. Strangulation under isolated peritoneal adhesions = 60 2. Strangulation under diverticula and diverticular bands =1 40 3. Strangulation by knots and nooses formed by^ "bands " 4. Strangulation by knots and nooses formed byy=:25 diverticula 5. Strangulation under an adherent appendix J 6. Strangulation through slits in the omentum ^ 20 7. Strangulation under omental ligaments = 15 The figures may be taken as representing the probable relative frequency of the various forms. THE PORTION OF INTESTINE INVOLVED. In the form of intestinal obstruction now under consideration, although many very different methods Clap. III.] Strangulation BY Bands. 57 are concerned in the production of that obstruction, the part of the alimentary tube involved is, with scarcely an exception, the same, viz. the small in- testine. A case has already been incidentally alluded to where a part of the ascending colon was found com- pressed beneath an adherent vermiform appendix, and another where a loop of the sigmoid flexure was strangulated through a rent in the mesentery. Instances may be given where a part of the colon has been obstructed beneath a tightly drawn mesen- tery (Duchaussoy), together with a few other isolated observations of the same character. So extremely rare, however, is it, for any part of the colon to be involved in the present variety of intestinal obstruc- tion, that, so far as the general bearings of the whole subject are concerned, the few reported cases may be regarded as pathological curiosities. If it be borne in mind that the hernia-like strangulation of the bowel requires that the gut to be involved should be quite free and movable, and that it should be capable also of readily forming a knuckle or loop, it will be seen that no part of the normal colon, if we except, perhaps, the sigmoid flexure, has a disposition that will allow it to share in this form of obstruction. In the great majority of all cases the segment of small intestine involved is the lower part of the ileum. In a fair number of instances the middle and upper portions of the ileum have been involved, but the examples of strangulation of the jejunum by the methods now under consideration are comparatively rare. Indeed, it may be said that, as one follows the small gut from the csecum to the pylorus, every foot of the distance renders the probability of strangula- tion more and more unlikely. I believe that there is no recorded instance of implication of the duodenum in this form of obstruction ; and, indeed, it would be 58 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. hi. anatomically impossible for the " third part " of that segment of the bowel to be involved. The frequency with which the last few feet of the ileum are involved is very intelligible. The coils of the lower ileum are the parts of the small intestine most apt to be found in the pelvis, and to be thus ensnared by those many adhesions that may result from pelvic peritonitis. They are, moreover, in the closest association with the csecum and appendix, and are most likely, therefore, to be strangulated by adhesions that may follow upon typhlitis, and by the cord formed by the vermiform appendix when it becomes adherent. Then, again, the true diverticulum arises from the lower ileum, and, as may be expected, the obstructions that it causes have, with compara- tively few exceptions, their seat in the last few feet of the lesser bowel* In strangulation due to this process the part of the ileum involved may be either that above or that below the origin of the abnormal appendage. In most cases that portion of the bowel is engaged that lies between the diverticulum and the csecum. It must also be noted that abnormal apertures in the mesentery, or such at least as are supposed to be of congenital origin, are most often found in that part of the membrane that is connected with the lower ileum. This part of the bowel, moreover, is often involved in hernise of the right side, and may suffer in any trouble due to bands of adhesion follow- ing upon complicated ruptures. Lastly, it is to be observed, that while any coil of small intestine taken from the upper ileum or jejunum would be equally movable at both ends, one end of the terminal part * I have not been able to find any case where a part of the small intestine has been involved in obstruction due to the diver- ticulum other than the ileum. The obstructed coil may not have been always a 'part of the last few feet of the gut, but it has still always been well within the limits of the ileum. Chap. III.] Strangulation BY Bands. 50 of the ileum, on the other hand, is more or less fixed by its connection with the caecum. As to the aviount of small intestine that may be involved in a strangulation, the greatest variety exists. The involved piece, on the one hand, may be so small that only one half of the circumference of the gut is nipped,"^ while on the other hand it may measure four feet. Every possible variety exists between these two extremes. Taking an average of forty -five cases where the amount of bowel involved is stated, I find that it reaches 15 '5 inches. The amount involved depends a great deal more upon the mechanism of the strangulation than upon the anatomical cause of it. "When the obstruction is due to strangulation under a band or through a slit the average amount of bowel involved is small, often a mere knuckle. When, on the other hand, the strangulation is brought about by knots and nooses, it is usually found that large coils are involved, it being impossible, under ordinary circumstances, for a little loop of bowel to be so strangulated. To these general observations there are, of course, many exceptions. For example, one of the cases in which an unusually large amount of intestine was strangulated was a case of strangulation under an adherent vermiform appendix, in which instance four feet of ileum were found to be implicated, f Exam- ples, also, of strangulation of two and even three feet of bowel beneath a band are, although exceptional, by no means uncommon. THE MECHANISM OF THE OBSTRUCTION. The actual mechanism of the obstruction varies a little in different cases. In many instances, no doubt, * Case of strangulation under an omental band, by Dr. J. Boeckel ; Bvill. et M^m. de la Soc. de CMr., tome iv., 1880, page 339. t Dr. Hilton Fagge ; Guy's Hosp. Reports, vol. xiv. 6o Intestinal Obstruction. rchap. hi. a knuckle or coil of gut is driven with such sudden and severe force beneath a band or through an aperture as to become practically strangulated at once, just as is the case in strangulated hernia, when the symp- toms appear abniptly during some unwonted exertion. No force of equal magnitude being brought to bear upon the part so as to eifect its reduction, it remains firmly gripped. When a comparatively large mass of intestine is involved, the strangulation need not be present from the first. But the band pressing upon the mesenteric vessels produces a congestion in the involved coils until at last the engorgement, aided by increasing distension of the loop itseK, leads to a complete strangulation. It must be observed also that engorgement of the veins, and a diminution in the arterial blood supply of the gut, with consequent deficiency of oxygen and excess of carbonic acid in such blood as occupies the intestinal walls, induces inordinate activity of the peristaltic movements. It is probable that these violent movements materially aid in producing a strangulation. Many cases are on record, from the accounts of which it is to be inferred that vascular distension has been a conspicuous factor in completing the obstruc- tion ; cases where much gut is involved, where the mesentery is extensively compressed, and where a bloody fluid in the peritoneum, or many "haemorrhages beneath the serous coat, point to the severity of the congestion that preceded actual stopping of the circu- lation. Increasing distension, moreover, of the implicated bowel must always be an important feature. This distension is due not only to matters passed into the partly occluded intestine from above, but also to gas developed within the strangulated and paralysed loop. Certain simple experiments throw some light upon the matter. M. Le Moyne opened Chap. 111.] Strangulation BY Bands. 6i the abdomen in the cadaver, and having drawn a little loop of the small intestine through a slit made in the mesentery, replaced the gut so arranged and closed the abdominal wound. He then made a second incision into the belly at a remote spot, and injected water or semi-fluid matter into the small intestine above the seat of the obstruction. The first matter that reached the loop in the mesentery passed through it, but as more was injected the little coil became rapidly distended, and was ultimately closed and entirely obstructed,* M. Anger, experimenting in another direction, drew a loop of gut out of the abdomen, and put a ligament lightly around its two ends. The ligature was loose enough to allow the gut to slide about within it, and to allow the tip of the little finger to be introduced into each end of the bowel. He then made a hole at the bend of the loop, at the part most remote from the ligature, and intro- duced a tube, through which air was blown. As the gut distended some air escaped, but the more swollen it became the more tightly was it gripped, until when fully distended it was found to be hermetically sealed ; and, what is more interesting, more gut had been drawn into the loop from the abdomen.^ In a great many cases the final cause of the stran- gulation is a twisting of the involved coil of bowel. This is well shown in several museum specimens. Here the band would not have been of itself sufficient to produce a strangulation provided that the bowel had not become twisted beneath it. On the other hand, it is equally obvious that the volvulus could not have been produced without the band. The twist is given to the bowel partly by distension, partly by its * Contrib. a I'E^ude de I'Occlusion Intestinale, by M. Lo Moyne. These de Paris, 1878. fDe i'Etranglemeut Intestinale, by M. Benjamin Anger. These de Paris, 1865. 62 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. it. own movements, partly by the dragging of the mesen- tery. In some cases, adhesions already existing above the implicated coil may have favoured the volvulus. There must be cases also, similar to that illustrated in Fig. 2, where the arrangement of the band is such, that it could never strangulate the bowel luitil the bowel itself had become twisted. There are instances also where the arrangement of the band and of the mesentery are such, that the engaged loop as it becomes distended is soon so acutely bent over the band by the dragging of the mesentery that it becomes obstructed (in one end of the loop at least) before it is very tightly gi'ipped. CHAPTER TV. STRANGULATION BY BANDS OR THROUGH APERTURES. SYMPTOMS. Frequency. — The cases that come under this category form no less than one fourth of the total number of cases of intestinal obstruction from all causes.* The high proportion here indicated depends partly upon the fact that several distinct anatomical con- ditions are comprised under one general heading, and partly upon the circumstance that a comparatively common ailment (local peritonitis) takes an im- portant part in the production of the different forms of the obstructing agent. Sex. — This variety of obstruction of the bowels is more common in males than in females in the pro- portion of 180 to 118. The distribution of these * From this enumeration are excluded hernise and affections of the rectum, both congenital and acquired. Males. Females, 52 59 43 15 52 14 21 13 Chap. IV.] Strangulation BY Bands. 63 figures among the different sub-varieties is shown in tiie following table from Leichtenstern : Strangulation hy false ligaments . ,, by the omentum „ by the diverticle „ by the appendix vermifonnis . „ .'throug-h sKts in the mesentery and in other parts, occluding the omentum 12 17 180 118 It will be seen that strangulation by peritoneal adhesions occurs with about equal frequency in the two sexes. The balance, however, is very strangely struck. THe two forms of peritonitis that are an- swerable for the bulk of the adhesions that cause strangulation are pelvic peritonitis, and the peritoneal inflammation associated with typhlitis. Pelvic peri- tonitis is practically limited to women, and in the matter of strangulations due to pelvic adhesions females are of course enormously ahead of the males. Typhlitis, on the other hand, is much more common in males than in females, the ratio being, according to Bamberger, twenty-six to four. The cases, however, of false ligaments due to pelvic inflammation out- number those due to inflammation of the caecum, and the balance between the two sexes is made nearly even by the increased frequency of hernia in the male, and by the greater liability to peritonitis from violence in members of that sex. The disproportion in the number of the cases among males and females due to strangulation by the omentum is readily explained. Owing to its limited length the omentum can contract adhesions about the right iliac fossa (typhlitis) with somewhat greater ease than about the pelvis. This circumstance would render omental adhesions a little more frequent in men. A more influential factor, however, is concerned. 64 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iv. The omental adhesions are very commonly, perhaps most commonly, brought about by external hernise, and Mr. Kingdon's tables show that for all ages and all varieties, rupture is twice as common among males as it is among females. The formation of omental cords after injury must also be taken into consideration. With regard to the diverticula, it is simply a matter of anatomical observation that they occur with much greater frequency in the male than in the female sex. Their situation about the csecal region would also render the shorter of them more liable to form adhesions after typlilitis than after pelvic peritonitis. The gi'eater frequency of strangulation by the appendix vermiformis in males is explained by the ease with which that process becomes adherent after typhlitis, typhlitis being certainly the most common cause of adherent appendix. The distribution of the few cases of strangulation through mesenteric and other slits and apertures calls for little comment. The slightly increased frequency in the female sex may possibly be due to the cir- cumstance that obstruction through slits in broad adhesions has been met with most often in the pelvis among the results of peritonitis in that region. Age. — Strangulation by false ligaments, by the omentum, by the appendix, and through abnormal slits and apertures occurs most frequently in persons between the ages of twenty and forty. This circum- stance obviously depends upon the fact that the forms of peritonitis, with which these affections are so intimately associated, are most common between these ages. Typhlitis falls within this period of life."* » " Typhlitis occurs most frequently between the ages of 16 and 35." Bauer; Ziemssen's Cyclopaedia of Medicine, vol. viii., page 317. Chap. IV.] Strangulation BY Bands. 65 Pelvic peritonitis occurs, with comparatively few exceptions, during the period of child-bearing, and as a rule early in that period, being frequent in primi- parse. Mr. Kingdon's tables show that the gi'eatest number of cases of hernia appear for the first time during the twenty years in question. During the same period also strangulation of hernise is common, and perhaps at no other period of life are injuries of a severe character more frequent. Many cases are met with after forty.* Forms of peritonitis that may be recovered from, and that lead to adhesions, may occur after that age, and, moreover, strangulation of the bowel may not occur for many years after the peritonitis that renders it possible has passed away. Before twenty these varieties of obstruction are comparatively uncommon, and before ten they are very rare. In one or two cases of incarceration by a false ligament in young children, the formation of the adhesion has probably depended upon an intra-uterine inflammation. Children are not liable to those forms of peritonitis that can be recovered from. In such subjects typhlitis is quite rare and pelvic peritonitis practically unknown. Infantile peritonitis and the tubercular form of the disease are uniformly fatal; although during the course of the more chronic forms of the latter affection strangulation may occur. Thus M. Larguier des Bancels reports the case of a boy, aged eight, who during the progress of tubercular peritonitis developed symptoms of acute obstruction, of which he soon died. The autopsy revealed a coil of the lower ileum strangulated by a band, one of the many resulting from the disease of the serous * The oldest patient of whom I can find record is a woman aged 80, who died of acute obstruction due to an omental band after hernia. Lucas-Champoinniere ; Bull, et Mem. de la Soc. de Chir. de Paris, tome v., 1879, page 645. F— 12 66 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iv. membrane."^ When, therefore, strangulation due to adhesions is met with in the young, it is usually found that the adhesions have followed injury, or the slight peritonitis that may attend caseous degeneration of the mesenteric glands. The main number, however, of the cases of incarceration coming under the present general category are such as depend upon congenital abnormalities. Strangulation by means of the true diverticulum oc- curs most frequently during the twenty years between 10 and 30. Of the two decades the latter presents the greater number of cases. Leichtenstern found the average age in seventy cases to be 2.5 years. He notes eight cases between the ages of 2 and 10 years, and Trier has recorded a case in an infant of 8 months.! Above the age of 40 strangulations due to the diverticulum are extremely rare. Incarceration by this process is to a great extent independent of peritonitis, since it can occur without the aid of acquired adhesions. Moreover, when a free process does acquire an attachment it seems to be capable of doing so without inducing a peritonitis of appreciable magnitude. A diverticular pouch or ligament, once free, is often found adherent to some spot on the serous membrane, while about that spot no trace of a previous inflammation will be found. [The account of the symptoms that follows is founded mainly upon an analysis of fifty recorded cases of this form of obstruction. These fifty cases were selected from a larger number, upon the sole ground that the accounts of them were more or less complete, both clinically and pathologically. Im- perfectly reported cases are, when not simply useless, actually misleading.] * Sur le Diagnostic et le Traitement Chirurgical des Etranglc- ments Internes. These de Paris, 1870. tPfaff's Mittheil., Jahrg. iii., Heft 9. Chap. IV.] Strangulation BY Bands, 67 The previous history. — This is a matter of some importance in tlie diagnosis, and may be con- sidered under two heads : 1. History of previous peritonitis, injury, etc., i.e. of circumstances that may have rendered an obstruction possible : 2. History of previous attacks of abdominal disturbance, i.e. of symptoms such as may have been produced by the same cause that brought about the final strangula- tion. 1. Out of the fifty cases above alluded to, there was in thirty-four instances (68 per cent.) a history of such previous trouble as may have produced causes for obstruction. In seventeen cases (34 per cent.) there was a history of peritonitis ; in eleven (22 per cent.) a history of hernia; in six (12 per cent.) a history of accident. In sixteen cases (32 per cent.) there was nothing in the previous history to note under this heading. These sixteen cases included several examples of the diverticulum, some in- stances of slit in the mesentery, and a few patients in whom adhesions had been found without any circumstances in their previous history to call atten- tion to the occurrence. As to the interval of time that may have elapsed between the causative afiection and the actual strangu- lation, the greatest variety exists. The shortest period I have noticed is in a case where only five weeks elapsed between the peritonitis, that presumedly formed the band, and the strangulation of the bowel. The longest period was met with in a female aged 52, who died of strangulation of the ileum by a band connected with the pelvic peritoneum. Twenty-one years before she had had "inflammation of the womb" following labour."^ In two cases, next to this in point of time, seven years had elapsed. Omitting the twenty-one years' case, the average duration of the * Guy's Hospital Keports, vol. xiv., page 272. 68 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iv. interval between the causative peritonitis and the ob- struction was three years. With regard to internal strangulations, due directly to hernia, they were in all cases observed in connec- tion with ruptures of many years' standing. In one patient aged 80, who died of incarceration of the bowel by an omental band, the hernia with which that band was associated had existed for sixty years. In the twelve cases where an accident is credited with being the existmg cause of a strangulation, the interval between the lesion and the intestinal trouble was in all cases short, and in two instances the development of strangulation was immediate. 2. Some of the patients who had died of obstruc- tion had complained of previous intestinal troubles, such as severe indigestion, ''spasms," bilious attacks and persistent pains in the abdomen. The number of individuals in whom such symptoms had been noticed was comparatively few, and it is questionable whether such symptoms were, or were not, dependent upon the same cause that ultimately brought about the obstruction. It can only be surmised that when adhesions are attached to the bowel itself they may, from traction or other causes, embarrass at times the peristaltic movement of the intestine and hinder the progress of its contents. In six individuals (12 per cent.) there was a history of previous obstruction. These attacks were marked by the onset of a sudden and severe pain of a colicky character, associated with vomiting and con- stipation. Their duration was, as a rule, quite short, varying from one to three days. Usually there had been only one such attack previous to the final one. In rarer instances there had been two or three. In some examples these previous attacks had been very severe. Mr. Gay has given details of the case of a man aged 42, who died from strangulation of a coil of Chap. IV.] Strangulation BY Bands. 69 ileum beneath an adherent appendix. Durmg the four years that preceded his death, the patient had had no less than thirty attacks of severe pain, associated with vomiting and absolute constipation. This case, however, was complicated by a stricture of the small intestine, to the occasional plugging of which these thirty attacks were probably due."^ The rarity of previous attacks in this form of intestinal obstruction compares strikingly with the great frequency of such occurrences in many of the more chronic forms of obstruction. The mode of onset.— The attack, as a rule, begins suddenly with very severe abdominal pain, followed rapidly by vomiting and symptoms of consti- tutional depression. On analysing fifty cases, I find that in thirty-five instances (70 per cent.) the mode of onset was more or less distinctly sudden. In thir- teen cases it was comparatively gradual, and in the remainino- two observations the commencement of the attack is not described. A study of the pathology of this form of obstruc- tion would lead one to infer that its onset would be sudden. A loop or knuckle of gTit is, in a moment, thrust beneath a band, or through an aperture, or is snared by a free noose or knot, and symptoms of strangrdation follow almost directly. An examination of the cases of gradual onset often reveals some cir- cumstance that may account for this somewhat unusual mode of commencement. In some instances the symptoms of absolute obstruction followed upon prolonged constipation, and the condition of the parts involved seems then to have borne the same relation to the conditions of acute strangulation that an " ob- structed hernia " bears to a strano-ulated one. In one case the intestines were so matted together by numerous adhesions, that partial obstruction may * Path. Soc. Ti-ans., vol. iii., page 101. 70 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iv. have taken place at many points at once, so that the final incarceration would be, in a sense, cumuliitive. In another instance of gradual onset, a loop of the ileum and a part of the ascending colon were beneath the band, the large bowel apparently affording some temporary protection to the small. In other cases it would appear that a large quantity of intestine had passed beneath a band, but had not been at first tightly nipped by it. In such examples complete strangulation would follow slowly upon the gradual distension and engorgement of the compressed coils. In the instances where the onset has been gradual, the patient has usually had some slight pain, often of an intermittent character, with trifling vomiting, and a constipation that has frequently not been absolute. Very soon, however, the symptoms increase in severity and assume all the characters of those of acute strangu- lation. The transition from subacute symptoms to acute is often coincident with the administration of strong aperients. Evidence of any immediate exciting^ cause is very commonly absent. In probably about two- thirds of the cases the attack seems to have come on when the patient was in good health, or at least free from any abdominal disturbance. In three cases (out of fifty), it set in suddenly during the night while the patient was asleep. In about one-third of the cases some circumstances have immediately preceded the symptoms of strangulation that may have taken an active part in producing the obstruction. The fallacy, however, of the argument, " post hoc propter hoc," may enter into many of these relations, or the supposed exciting cause may have been really a part of the symptoms of the final malady. This would, perhaps, apply to those instances where strangulation has fol- lowed upon a " bilious attack " or upon severe " indi- gestion." Putting these cases aside, however, we find Chap. IV.] Strangulation by Bands. 71 that the obstruction has several times appeared after a hearty meal, and especially a meal of indigestible food, such, for example, as beans. In connection with hernia, it has come on when the rupture was down or giving trouble. In two instances it appeared while straining at stool. In one or two cases it came on after the administration of a purge. It has followed also upon a sharp attack of diarrhoea. In quite a fair number of patients the symptoms of strangulation have made their appearance either during or imme- diately after unusual exertion. In one instance a peculiar position of the body seems to have had some influence, as illustrated by the case, reported by Dr. Quain, where a coil of ileum was found strangulated through a slit in the broad ligament of the uterus. Here the attack came on suddenly while the patient was bending to unlace her boots. In a remarkable case reported by Mr. Bryant, a distended bladder was the immediate cause of a strangulation being pro- duced. In this instance a coil of bowel was involved beneath a band that passed from the bladder to the lumbar spine. The patient had been out for a drive and had been compelled to retain her urine for some hours. Shortly after emptying her bladder, symptoms of acute obstruction set in. Here there is little doubt but that the distended viscus so raised the band out of the pelvis as to allow a loop of gut to pass beneath it.* The pain. — The pain attending these cases of Ltitestinal obstruction is among the most conspicuous and most constant of the symptoms. It is usually the first manifestation of the attack. It is generally at the commencement of great severity, and is of a griping or colicky character. In several instances the patients are spoken of as being bent double with the pain, or even as rolling on the * Med. Times and Gazette^ vol. i. , 1872, page 304. 72 Intestinal Obstruction, [Chap. iv. floor ill agony. Often it appears to have been mode- rate, but ill no case could it be described as trivial. As to the situation of this early pain, Mr. Gay, in his well-known essay on "The Solitary Band," observes, " the localisation of the pain is ever at first due to the constricting agent, and marks its seat." In other works similar observations occur. With these state- ments I might be permitted to disagree. In examin- ing into the clinical history of the fifty cases that form the basis of the present remarks, I find that in many instances the initial pain was distinctly referred to a spot that subsequent post-mortem examination proved to have corresponded to the seat of obstruction. But in a still greater number of the cases this pain is described as being located in a point more or less re- mote from the seat of strangulation. The proportion of the latter class of case to the former is nearly that of two to one. Taking all the cases together, it is seen that in the majority of them the pain is referred to the immediate vicinity of the umbilicus. In some of these examples the obstructed coil was, it is true, found to be placed near to the umbilicus, and in other cases the strangulating band had an attachment close to that cicatrix. But in still other and more numerous in- stances the situation of the intestinal lesion was found to be remote from the umbilicus, was located in the right iliac fossa, or deep in the pelvis, or close to a hernia] opening about the groin. Still more marked examples of this lack of relationship may be given. A few of them are the following. The pain was on the right side just below the liver ; the obstruction was in the ileum eighteen inches from the csecum.* The pain was on the left side, and on a level with the navel, and in one case where it was so placed a coil of ileum had passed through a rent in the right broad * Med. Times and Gazette, vol. ii., 1876, jiage 651. Chap. IV.] Strangulation by Bands. 73 ligament,'^ while in another the strangulation was deep in the right iliac fossa, f The pain was near the gall bladder ; the obstruction was in the ileum. \ The pain was in the epigastrium, and the trouble that caused it was due to a band passing between the urinary bladder and the lumbar spine. § In speaking of the situation of the pain in intesti- nal obstruction in a subsequent chapter, I have pointed out the physiological improbability that a painful spot among a series of complicated and moving coils, like those of the smaller bowel, would be accurately localised. The pain in intestinal strangulation would often seem to be a referred pain, and it is needless to point out that in affections of other abdominal viscera, discomfort is often felt at a distant point. From the frequency with which the pain is referred to the vicinity of the umbilicus, it might be gathered that it has been conducted to the great abdominal nervous centres. It is complained of, with strange frequency, as being about the middle line. The solai' plexus, through which the small intestine is supplied, is situated about four inches above the umbilicus, while the superior mesenteric plexus commences still nearer to the navel, and runs for some little distance almost directly in the middle line. Pain conducted along the latter plexus would probably be most definitely felt near the middle line, and about the umbilicus. It may be noted that the pain to which reference is now being made is a pain due to compression of a limited part of the gut, and not one depending upon disordered peri- staltic movement. The pain caused by such move- ments could not well be localised, since its very occur- rence involves a constant changing of position. From *Path. Soc. Trans., vol. xii,, page 103. t Union Medicale, 1860, page 97. t British Med. Journ., vol. i., 1883, page 999. ^BuU. de la Soc. Anat., 1843. 74 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap, i v. the facts themselves, however, I would maiiitain that the position of the pain, in this form of internal strangulation is of no diagnostic value as a guide to the seat of the lesion ; that it is more often complained of about the umbilicus than elsewhere, and that as a means of ascertaining the locality of the trouble it is actually misleading. The pain that is so conspicuous a feature at the commencement of these cases persists throughout the course of them. It does not, however, retain its original intensity. It soon becomes less severe, and often undergoes considerable abatement. In some of the more acute cases, however, it has persisted with all its original intensity until deadened by the col- lajDse that supervenes. The pain often ceases shortly before death. This circumstance, however, is of no significance ; it is usually coincident with a profounder collapse, or with gangrene of the bowel involved, or with advanced narcotism. One or two cases have been recorded where the pain has been almost an insignificant feature, and of these extremely rare cases no satisfactory explana- tion can be given. The most striking one that I have met with is reported by Mr. Hulke."* The patient was a man, aged thirty-two, who, after a hearty meal, was seized with sudden abdominal pain and vomiting. The pain soon passed ofif, but the vomiting persisted and became very severe. Neither faeces nor flatus were passed by the rectum. On the tenth day the vomiting was feculent, but the patient still complained of little or no pain. Such pain as there was was about the umbilicus. Laparotomy was performed, and the man survived the operation fifty- three hours. The autopsy revealed a coil of the lower ileum strangulated beneath a band formed by * Medical Times and Gazette, vol. ii., 1877, page 482. Chap. IV.] Strangulation BY Bands. 75 an epiploic appendix of the sigmoid flexure that had become adherent to the peritoneum near the right sciatic notch. The pain in the hernia-like strangulation of the bowel is continuous. It presents slight exacerbations, as do all " colicky " pains. It does not, however, intermit at any time, nor are there any intervals of calm between definite paroxysms. I shall later on have occasion to draw attention to the fact that, speaking generally, paroxysmal pains indicate an incomplete occlusion of the bowel."^ When the obstruction is absolute the pain becomes practically continuous. In the present form of in- carceration the lumen of the gut becomes entirely obliterated, and the pain in consequence presents no paroxysmal character. To this statement there are but few exceptions to be made, and such as there are are probably susceptible of explanation. In Mr. Gay's monograph, already quoted, he states that he met with only six examples of paroxysmal pain among forty-one cases where the nature of the pain was indicated. Among my fifty cases I find eight instances of intermittent pain. The circumstances of these eight examples are worthy of brief notice. 1. Female, aged 53. Pain appears to have been only paroxysmal at the commencement. Case of strangailation beneath a band ; laparotomy with cure on sixth day.t 2. Female, aged 23. Here only a single fine of gut was found beneath a band, not a knuckle or loop ; the obliteration of the canal was therefore apparently incomplete. The pain is merely said to have " persisted on and off." J 3. Female, aged 26. Case of strangulation beneath a band. Here the strangulation does not appear to have been severe at fii'st, and laparotomy was not considered necessary until the eleventh day.§ * See chapter xx. t British Medical Journal, 1883, page 999. X St. Bart.'s Hosp. Reports, vol. xvii,, page 277. § Bull, et Mem. de la Soc. do Chir. de Paris, 1879, page 632. 76 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iv. 4. Female, aged 21. Strangulation beneath a band. The incarceration was not severe, and when laparotomy vras per- formed on the fourth day the involved coil was found in good condition. The patient recovered.* 5. Male, aged 42. In this case, already alluded to, there was, besides the incarceration, a strictui-e of the intestine, to which the paroxysmal pain was probably to no small degree due. 6. " A boy." Case of strangulation beneath a band.f 7. Female, aged 26. Mr, Bryant's case of band arising from the bladder. Each paroxysm was attended with stranguary, and the " play " allowed to the band by its mobile point of attachment probably prevented the obstruction from being very complete. 8. Female, aged 45. Paroxysms every half -hour. Two bands were found to hold down two portions of bowel. Neither band compressed the gut greatly, and the upper of the two involved coils was but veiy slightly pressed upon by the band. I In the majority of these cases, therefore, there is some reason to suspect that the occlusion of the bowel was not so complete as it may have been, nor so perfect as it commonly is. During the early stages of the malady, before any abdominal tenderness exists, the pain is often described as being relieved by pressure. There is a direct connection, more or less con- stantly observed, between the severity of the pain and the urgency of the vomiting, and especially be- tween the pain and the degree of constitutional disturbance. Tenderness of the abdomen.— This symp- tom, as demonstrated by pressure upon the abdomen, is, as a rule, entirely absent at first. It may never appear, especially in cases pursuing a rapid course. In a few cases of a less acute character it has been of trifling degree, or not sufficiently marked to attract * Bull et Mem. de la See. de Chir. de Paris, 1879, page .564. t Sur le Diagnostic et Traitement des Etranglement Internes. Thfese de Paris, 1870. X Lancet^ vol. ii., 1873, page 773. Chap. IV] Strangulation BY Bands. 77 notice. In the majority of cases, however, some part of the abdomen becomes tender during the course of the disease. This tenderness may be limited in extent, or diffused. Limited tenderness usually ap- pears about the second or third day. It is a symp- tom that, when well marked, is of considerable diagnostic value, since it appears to be always restricted to the actual seat of the lesion. It depends, no doubt, upon congestion or inflammation of the in- volved coils, or upon some slight peritonitis excited in their serous coat. As a factor in diagnosis, there- fore, it is of much more value than is the simple spontaneous pain always observed in these maladies. A diffused tenderness of a marked nature indi- cates the onset of a peritonitis, and is also a symptom of much clinical value. When peritoneal inflam- mation has become diffused a general tenderness is practically constant, unless modified or concealed by profound collapse or narcotism. In several cases, after the symptoms have lasted for a few days and the pain has been severe, the abdo- men has exhibited a general but slightly marked tenderness on pressure. This is probably the result of violent peristaltic movements. In such move- ments the muscular coat of the bowel is practically in a state of cramp, and there is no reason why the in- volved gut should not become as tender after a pro- longed attack of cramp as does the calf of the leg after it has been the seat of a like disturbance. This cause of tenderness may perhaps contribute to the production of the local " \)wii on pressure," but I presume that it would in no ordinary case attain to the marked character of the tenderness due to perito- nitis. It is obvious that any fine distinctions on this Bcore are impossible. In several cases of localised tenderness pressure over the affected spot has caused an increase in the 78 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iv. colicky pains, and has induced an immediate attack of vomiting. Toiiiitiiig. — Vomiting is a conspicuous and con- stant symptom. In an isolated case or so it has been the earliest manifestation of the obstruction. In the great majority of cases it comes on immediately after the appearance of the pain or within a few hours of that event. I have met with two instances where the vomiting did not appear until twenty-four hours after the onset of the pain.* It soon, however, became stercoraceous, and the patient died on the eighth day in one case, and was cured by laparotomy on the fifth day in the other. In both instances the initial pain had been sudden and severe. As regards its character the ejected material con- sists jBrst of the contents of the stomach and then usually of bilious matters. In its next stage it may be thin and of a brownish colour, or be comparable to pea-soup, or be of a yellow tint like the yolk of egg. Vomited matters with these characters are often described as possessing an " intestinal odour." Lastly, the vomit may become stercoraceous. Stercoraceous vomit is common in this form of obstruction. In five of my fifty cases the character of the ejecta is not clearly described, but in the remaining forty-five cases the vomit became stercoraceous in twenty-eight instances, and remained non-stercoraceous in seventeen. These figures very closely correspond with those given by Mr. Gay. That surgeon found that the vomited material became stercoraceous in twenty-six cases out of thirty-seven. The period in the attack at which the vomit assumed a feculent character varied from the second to the ninth day. An average taken from * Dr. Hilton Fagge ; Guy's Hosp. Reports, vol. xiv. : Dr. Bocckel ; Bull, et Mem. de la Soc. de Chir., tome vi., 1880, page 339. Chap. IV.] Strangulation BY Bands. 79 the twenty-eight cases gave the fifth clay as the mean. An examination of the seventeen cases where the vomit remained non-feculent revealed a striking fact. The cases separated into two categories : in one, death had taken place before the usual period for the onset of stercoraceous vomiting had been reached ; in the other, the course of the attack had been less acute than usual, and the patient's life prolonged beyond the average duration. Thus feculent vomiting was absent in some of the most acute and in some of the least acute cases. In nine of the seventeen examples the patient had died within two and a half days of the commence- ment of the attack. In the remaining eight cases life had been prolonged on an average to the eighth day. In one instance the patient had died on the fourth day, but the matters vomited had not become sterco- raceous. On an average, life was prolonged for three days after the onset of feculent vomiting. Cazin observes that stercoraceous vomit is rare in cases of strangulation by the diverticulum. This is, to a certain extent, true, since these cases very com- monly assume a rapid course, and end in death before the usual time for the occurrence of such vomiting has been reached. I have only met with one instance where the vomit distinctly contained blood. It was in a case of acute strangulation of the lower ileum by a diverticu- lum. The patient lived two and a half days. The vomited matter was never feculent."^ When once it has set in the vomiting will persist until the termination of the attack. It is one of the most distressing of the symptoms. Everything swal- lowed is immediately ejected, and even when nothing is taken by the mouth the vomiting will continue * British Med. Journal, vol. ii,, 1882, page 785; by Dr. J. Cockle. 8o INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION. [Chap. IV. incessantly. Often a little movement or a little pres- sure upon the abdomen will excite an attack. When not actually sick the patient will commonly complain of a most distressing nausea and will be troubled by eructations of flatus. It is worthy of note that the patient is in no way relieved by the attacks of vomit- ing, as may be the case in other maladies associated with this symptom, and as is sometimes the case in other forms of intestinal obstruction. With few exceptions, the longer the obstruction lasts the more violent and distressins: do the attacks of vomiting become. Sometimes they may cease entirely a few hours before death, just as the pain may abate under the same circumstances. In other cases, however, there has been a sudden and profuse gush of vomit either just before death or in the act of dying, the fluid pouring, without effbi-t, from the mouth and throus^h the nostrils. This is observed also in other forms of obstruction and sometimes in death from peritonitis. In a few isolated cases, where the obstruction does not appear to have been very complete at first, the vomiting has undergone distinct abatement after the violent attack marking the onset of the trouble has passed away. Opium has often a very decided effect upon the vomiting. When the patient is well under the in- fluence of the drug the symptoms of intestinal ob- struction may be more or less efiiciently masked. The pain abates, the pulse imj^roves, the amount of urine, if lessened, increases, and the vomiting becomes less troublesome or ceases for a while. Under the in- fluence of opium, stercoraceous vomiting even may cease, and on the reappearance of the symptom the ejected matters may be non-feculent. This is well illustrated by a case recorded by JMr. Berkeley Hill. The patient was a child aged ten, and the obstruction Chap, iv.i Strangulation by Bands. 8i was due to strangulation of the ileum under a band. By the tliird day of the attack the vomiting was severe and feculent. Opium was given. For four hours the vomiting ceased entirely, and when it re- turned was much less distressing, was less frequent, and was non-stercoraceous. Although laparotomy was not performed until the seventh day the vomited matter appears never to have again become feculent, except on one occasion.'* In this and like cases it is probable that the drug stills the peristaltic movement of the intestine, so that what is ejected is merely the contents of the stomach and of the highest part of the smaller bowel. Peritonitis, presumedly by the paralysing effect it has upon the intestine, seems to have some influence upon the production of feculent vomiting. When acute peritonitis sets in early there is cer- tainly a much less tendency for the ejected matter to become stercoraceous. In some cases this has been very marked. The same may be said, perhaps, of chronic peritonitis. In one case where acute strangu- lation of the bowel occurred during the progress of a chronic peritonitis, the vomiting, although severe, never became stercoraceous. Yet the patient lived six days.! In nearly every instance the act of vomiting is associated with much retching and distress. In one case, however (that of Mr. Hulke's, quoted on page 74), where the patient had little or no pain, the vomited matter appears to have gushed passively from the mouth with little trouble to the patient. The vomiting was in this instance copious, and in time feculent. Constipation. — Constipation is, as a rule, abso- lute from the first, and continuous. Neither faecal * Lancet, vol. i. , 1876, page 773. t Case by M. Larguier dea Bancels, loc. cit., page 64, G— 12 82 Intestinal Obstruction. tchap. iv. matter nor flatus is passed after the onset of the attack. It would seem as if all the bowel below the seat of the obstruction became instantaneously paralysed, since it would be absurd to assume that in every case the colon is quite empty at the time that the strangulation occurs. The exceptions to this condition of things are very rare. In two or three instances a motion has been passed during or immediately after the occurrence of the initial symptoms, and was probably derived from the intestine below the site of the strangulation. Enemata administered almost at any time after the commencement of the attack may possibly bring away scybala from the colon, and in one case such scybala came away repeatedly. Flatus generated in the large intestine may also be passed, but the circumstance is quite exceptional. I have met with two recorded instances where blood is said to have been passed. In one case, in a man aged 53, a coil of the lower ileum, eighteen inches in length, was strangulated beneath a band. The patient died, after laparotomy, on the sixth day. Constipation was absolute throughout, but the patient is said to have passed a little blood. It is not stated if the man had piles.* In the other case (the case by Mr. Berkeley Hill, alluded to on page 80) enemata on two occasions brought away scybala and blood. The patient was a child aged ten, and there is no evidence to show that the blood was derived from the seat of strangulation. It may have been produced accidentally by the enema tube. At autopsies blood is frequently found in the engaged coil and in the intes- tine above it, but not, so far as I am aware, in the bowel below the obstruction. Out of my fifty cases, I have met with six ^Dr. Fincliam ; Med, Times and Gazette, vol. ii., 1876, page Cil, Chap. IV.] Strangulation by Bands, 83 instances where a more or less copious motion or mo- tions passed during the course of the disease. In all instances the event occurred shortly before death. In two of the examples the stool must have been derived from the bowel below the obstruction (which was found to be complete at the autopsy), and I believe that its evacuation was coincident with the appearance of general peritonitis. In both of these cases a single stool was passed on the day before death. In both there had been absolute obstruction for more than seven days. In both the peritonitis was very recent, and was not due to perforation.* It is not difficult to imagine that the onset of so grave a change as general peritonitis may produce such effect upon the abdomi- nal nervous centres as to excite the passive bowel below the obstruction, although of the nature of that influence we may have no knowledge. The four remaining cases are more intelligible, and in each of them the unusual motion may have come from the bowel above the obstruction. In two there was perforation, and in two there was volvulus. The first of these cases, in a man aged twenty- one, had assumed a subacute course, the patient dpng on the thirteenth day. Constipation had heen absolute throughout, but shortly before his death the patient passed a copious black liquid stool into the bed. The autopsy showed that eight inches of the lower ileum had become strangulated beneath a band passing fi-om the transverse colon to the caecum. An ulcer of the stomach was found to have perforated, and the reHef thus given to the distended bowel had allowed the incar- cerated knuckle to become partly withdrawn from under the band. In fact, the obstruction at the last moment had ceased to be complete, t In the second case, an aperient given shortly before death led to some greenish loose motions being passed. The obstruc- tion had been complete for nine days. The autopsy showed a perforation of the bowel above a coil of ileum engaged beneath * Maunoury. These de Paris, 1819. t Dr. Hilton Fagge ; Guy's Hospital Eeports, vol. xiv., page «<2i 84 Intestinal Obstruction, [Chap. iv. a band. The mecliaiiism of the relief was probably the same in this case as in the preceding. * In the two remaining cases, although the gut was in each instance beneath a band, yet the main cause of the obstruction was a volvulus of the engaged coil. Without the volvulus the obstruction would have been but partial. It will be shown in speaking of twist of the small intestine, that the constipation in such cases is commonly not complete, and to that variety of obstruction these two examples more properly belong. In one of the examples the patient, a man aged twenty-one, lived forty-three hours, and passed two liquid motions not long before death, f In the other case, that of a child aged foui-, constipation had been complete, and all the symptoms of in- carceration were marked up to the foui'th day, when a dose of croton oil produced a copious evacuation. The child lived until the tenth day.;}; GENERAL CONSTITUTIONAL SYMPTOMS. Rig'or. — In only one case among fifty can I find any mention of a rigor associated with the appearance of strangulation. In this solitary instance there can be little doubt that the rigors (for the patient had several) were connected with a circumscribed perito- nitis which was developing at the time of the onset of the incarceration, and that they had no direct con- nection with the strangulation. § Prostration. — Usually coincident with the onset of the attack the patient exhibits evidences of gi'eat prostration, and in severe cases this soon deepens into profound and even fatal collapse. There is great muscular weakness, the face is drawn with pain and has an aspect of horrible anxiety, the features become pinched, the eyes sunken and surrounded by bluish rings, and the voice weak * Bull, de la See. Anat. de Paris, 1861, page 118 ; by M. Brichetau. , t M. Le Moyne ; Contrib. a I'Etude de rOcclusion Intestinale. These de Paris, 1878. 4: Dr. Kemot; Path. See. Trans., vol. xv., page 101. § M. Terrier ; Bull, et Mdm. de la Soc. de Chir. de Paris, 1879, page 564f Chap. IV.] Strangulation BY Bands. 85 and muffled. A cold sweat breaks out upon the sur- face, and in extreme cases the limbs become cyanosed and the complexion livid. The patient at last sinks, retaining his intelligence, as a rule, to the last. The pulse is small, often becoming thready, as in 23eritonitis, and of increased frequency. It commonly rises to 120, 130, or 140. It may become much modi- fied when opium is freely given. The tempei'atiu'e is commonly throughout the whole case subnormal, being the temperature of collapse. Even when peritonitis sets in it may still remain subnormal. In acute cases it may be found to sink gradually, almost hour by hour, as the symp- toms advance, and it may even continue to sink when peritonitis has set in. A gradual increase in the frequency of the pulse is often associated with this depression of the bodily heat. As a rule, however, the occiuTence of acute peritonitis has an appreciable effect upon the temperature, provided that it has not been set up by perforation, and may cause it to rise from below normal to normal, and to reach 99° or 99 '6°, or even 100°. When perforation occurs at the end of a case of intestinal obstruction a profounder state of collapse is as a rule at once induced, and upon the sinking temperature the inflammation has no in- fluence. A rise of temperature above the normal in a case of acute strangulation of the bowel may be said to, in all cases, indicate the appearance of peritonitis. The respii'atiojis are increased in frequency, are superficial, and are often of a supracostal type. In this form of obstruction the embarrassment to the respiration caused by intense distension of the abdo- men is very rarely met with. The tongpiie is usually coated, being at first white and then becoming diy and brown. It exhibits, how- ever, some few exceptions to this rule, as, for example, 86 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iv. in a case in which the tongue on the tenth day of the symptoms is described as being moist, white, and but slightly coated. There is usually a very offensive taste in the mouth, especially after the vomited matters have be- come stercoraceous. Intense thirst is usually complained of, espe- cially in cases where vomiting has been very profuse. In one or two instances the occurrence of hiccup throughout the progress of the case has been noted. Urine. — The quantity of the urine is very com- monly diminished, and in the most acute cases may be entirely suppressed, the bladder being found empty. As will be subsequently explained (chapter XX.), the effect of internal strangulation upon the renal excretion is brought about mainly through the nervous symptom. A diminution, therefore, in the amount of the urine is most marked in the most acute cases, and in those attended by intense pain and much collapse. In many instances the excretion of the urine has been immediately increased on the patient coming under the influence of opium. The position of the obstruction in the small intestine has no effect upon this symptom. It may be absent when the strangulation concerns the jejunum, and present when it involves the ileum. The significance of this symptom is more fully dealt with in the chap- ter just alluded to. In only two cases was stranguary noticed. In one of these the obstructing band was attached to the bladder. In the other, so large a mass of empty coils hung down into the pelvis that it may possibly have pressed upon the bladder. The patient was a girl aged ten, and the mass was found, during life, to press upon the rectum. In not a solitary case was tenesmus complained of. Chap. IV.] Strangulation BY Bands. 87 In a single instance the patient became delirious before death. He was a young man, the symptoms were very acute, and death ensued in less than two days. In three cases out of the fifty the patients suffered from cramps. In two of these the cramps were com- plained of in the lower limbs, in the remaining case in the jaws and hands. In all three examples the symptoms of strangulation were very severe, and the progress of the case rapid. The subject of muscular spasm in connection with strangulation of the bowel has been fully investigated by M. Berger."^ He finds that the cramping pains are usually in the feet and calves, that the symptom is limited to cases of severe strangTilation, and is most common in adults. He has collected fourteen cases where this feature was noted. Eleven were cases of strangulated hernia, two of strangulation by a band, and one of obstruc- tion by a diverticle. It is in a case of this kind, associated with cramps in the limbs, attended by profound collapse, with a cold skin and cyanosed extremities that the mistake of diagnosing intestinal obstruction for cholera has occurred. This error may well be made when the strangulation has been preceded by an attack of diarrhoea, t There is a case reported by Dr. Peacock that is, I should imagine, unique. It concerns a man, aged sixty- five, who died collapsed, and in whose abdomen a small knuckle of the ileum was found strangulated by a band. The involved gut was gangTenous. The patient is said to have been ill six days with constipa- tion, but to have worked up to the morning of his death. *Bull. et Mem. de la Soc. de Chir. de Paris, vol. ii., 1876, page 698. t Bee case by M. Le Moyne, loc. cit. 88 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iv. THE CONDITION OF THE ABDOMEN. The abdominal walls remain flaccid, or in their normal condition until such time as local ten- derness becomes marked, or general peritonitis sets in, or distension reaches a considerable degree. Even in some cases where peritonitis was found after death, the parietes appear to have retained their normal sup- pleness to the end. Meteorisni.— Distension of the abdomen is in this form of obstruction comparatively slight. It usually appears about the third day. In no case could it be spoken of as excessive. The most extreme instance of distension of which I find a record was met with in a patient who was attacked with stran- gulation of the bowel when suffering from chronic tubercular peritonitis. It never approaches to the excessive degree of distension met with in cases of volvulus of the sigmoid flexure. It appears to be least marked in the rapid cases, and especially in cases attended by active peristaltic movements in the bowels and extreme vomiting. Meteorism to attain great magnitude requires the intestinal walls to be paralysed, and the presence of colicky pains serves to indicate that that paralysis has not yet supervened. Excessive vomiting also must tend to keep the intes- tine empty. When peritonitis sets in the meteorism undergoes a considerable increase. The swelling is usually first noticed in the epigas- tric and umbilical regions, and may form a very distinct elevation of the parietes in those districts. The regions of the colon remain flat, the meteorism being, of course, limited to the lesser bowel. When, however, the distension has reached any magnitude it practically occupies the entire abdomen. In one case there was very visible distension of the transverse Chap. IV.] Strangulation BY Bands. 89 colon, but in this instance the great omentum had been much dragged upon. The connection between these two circumstances is discussed elsewhere (chapter vi.). On percussion the abdomen is found to be equally resonant all over, although early in the case there may be less marked resonance or absence of resonance in the region of the colon. That part of the bowel must soon, however, become overlapped by the dis- tended small intestine. A careful examination of the abdomen toy palpation usually reveals nothing, and a digital ex- ploration of the rectum gives equally negative results. There are, however, some remarkable and rare exceptions to these latter statements. (1) Some local dullness may be discovered in the otherwise tympanitic abdomen ; (2) a tumour or swelling may be detected through the parietes ; and (3) something may be re- vealed by an examination of the rectum. It may be conceived that a localised area of dull- ness on percussion may possibly be due to one of three things : to an extravasation into the peritoneal cavity ; to large coils of gut involved in the strangu- lation ; or to the empty loops of bowel that may lie below the point of obstruction. With regard to a definite swelling or tumour, it will be reasonable to conclude that it could depend upon the second only of these possible causes. It must be no matter of surprise that both these phenomena (the dullness on percussion and the swelling) are very rare. Much effusion of fluid in the peritoneal cavity is very un- common in these cases and has not the least tendency to become localised in any way. Extravasations of blood do take place, but never, I believe, attain such magnitude as to be the cause of dullness on percus- sion. In the second place the involved bowel is often a mere knuckle, and is very commonly found against 90 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. iv. the posterior abdominal wall or within the pelvis. In any case it is very apt to be covered over by the distended coils above the obstruction. In the third place the empty coils of intestine below the site of the incarceration are found, with comparatively few exceptions, to hang down into the pelvic cavity, and to be thus removed from examination. (1) Localised dullness on 2)e7'cussio7i, and (2) a tumour felt through the parietes. — In my fifty cases I find only seven examples of the first phenome- non and four of the second. With one exception, the dullness was localised in the right iliac region, the rest of the abdomen being tympanitic. In every instance it corresponded to the site of some tenderness on pressure. In one case it was due to the matting together of the ileum and caecum by adhesions. In all the other examples it was caused by the engorged coil involved in the strangulation. This coil was always large, varying from eight inches in one case to two metres in another. In the excep- tion above alluded to the patch of dullness was just to the right of the right rectus muscle. It was caused by a loop of strangulated jejunum. The tumour detected through the parieties was in each case caused by large loops of the intestine engorged by strangulation. In one example the incarcerated coil was filled with blood. In three cases the swelling was felt in the right iliac fossa. In the fourth case it was in the middle line and extended from near the navel almost to the pubes ; it was not observed until after the general distension had been re- lieved by the trochar, and was caused by a large coil of bowel strangulated by a diverticulum adherent to the umbilicus. The swelling seems to have been, in each example, ill-defined, dull, tender, and about the size of the fist. It is remarkable that in every instance the mass was not felt until towards the end of the case. Chap, v.] Strangulation BY Bands. 91 or was discovered rather towards its conclusion than its commencement. (3) A tumour felt through the rectum. — Although extensive coils of empty and flaccid intestine are often found hanging inertly into the pelvis, I know of only one instance where they were felt during life. This occurred in Mr. Hill's case already quoted (page 82). Here a soft round mass was felt through the rectum, and was found to press upon its anterior wall. In only three cases out of fifty were any coils of intestine visible through the anterior ahdoviiiuil parietes. One was a case of acute obstruction associated with a remarkable paroxysmal pain and demanding laparotomy on the third day. The other cases pursued a chronic course, death ensuing on the thirteenth and fourteenth days respectively. The movement of the intestinal coils were visible in both of these examples, in the former case on the tenth day, in the latter on the seventh. One of the patients is described as being much emaciated. These cases form but a feeble exception to the rule " that visible peristaltic movements are met with only in cases of chronic obstruction. CHAPTER Y. STRANGULATION BY BANDS OR THROUGH APERTURES COURSE AND PROGNOSIS. The coiu^se pursued by this form of obstruction is always more or less acute and, so far as is at present known, every case, unless relieved, ends in death. The duration of any given case depends, I think, neither upon the age of the patient nor the situation of the obstruction in the lesser bowel, but upon the 92 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. v. tightness of the strangulation and the amount of bowel involved. The most rapidly fatal cases are those in which a considerable quantity of intestine has been severely strangulated. The two conditions must be combined ; for in some of the least acute cases large coils have been found to have been involved, but only moderately compressed. As a solitary factor, the rigour of the incarceration is the most important in bringing about a rapidly fatal termination. The larger the coil so involved the more severe the manifestations. A sudden onset of symptoms need not mean a very rapid course. Some of the examples of abrupt onset sliow^ a period of ten to thirteen days before death ensued. As a rule, however, the more gradual the development of the symptoms the longer is the probable duration of the case. Since in snaring by loops or knots larger coils are, on an average, involved than in the case of strangula- tion under a band, it follows that the progress of the malady is more rapid in the former variety of strangulation than in the latter. In the former class of case, moreover, the incarceration is usually more complete and more rigorous. Thus the average dura- tion until death, in a case of strangulation under a band or through an aperture, is six days. The average duration in a case of snaring, whether by a false ligament or by a diverticle, is four days. Some of the most acute cases led to death in ten, seventeen, and twenty-four hours, while in the least severe instances life was prolonged to the thirteentli, fourteenth, and fifteenth day. Opium, if given in large doses, has, as already stated, a considerable effect upon, the progress of any given case. Under its use the pain and vomiting have greatly diminished, the pulse has improved, the temperature has risen, and the patient has been placed apparently in a much more favourable condition. Chap, v.] Strangulation by Bands. 93 Many of the patients die simply of collapse, others die later of exhaustion brought al^out l)y the intensity of the pain, the severe vomiting, etc. ; others die of acute peritonitis. Peritonitis is not very commonly found in this form of strangulation of the bowel. It is met with in a little more than one half of the cases. The period of its onset and the conditions under which it ap- pears vary greatly. It has been recorded as present in a patient who died in seventeen hours after the commencement of the obstructive attack, while it has been found to be entirely absent in another case where the individual lived fourteen days. The average time for its appearance is about the fifth day. Perforation of the bowel above the seat of obstruc- tion is quite nncommon, and would not appear to occur in more than 10 or 12 per cent, of all the cases. It has caused death as early as the fifth day. In speculating as to tlic possibility of spon- taneous recovery in cases of this form of strangula- tion of the bowel, one cannot fail to note that patients who have ultimately died of acute obstruction have sometimes had previous attacks that, so long as they lasted, were as severe as the final one. It would not be unreasonable to assume that these previous disturbances were, in some cases at least, brought about by the same mechanism that caused at last the fatal attack. If so, they may prove to be instances of spontaneous relief of an acute obstruction. Then, again, an isolated case or so has been recorded where patients were attacked with symptoms of intestinal incarceration that could not be diagnosed from like attacks known to be due to " bands." These patients, after being almost in articulo mortis, after vomiting feculent matter for days, after presenting the phenomena of absolute obstruction, have at last recovered. So far as I am aware, no autopsy at a subsequent date has made clear 94 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. v. the nature of such cases, and therefore that they may have been cases of strangulation by bands must be a matter of pure conjecture. In the face of instances like these it is well to observe what light the post-mortem examination of fatal cases can throw upon this question of spon- taneous relief. There is not the least reason for supposing that the bowel, when it has been strangu- lated for a certain length of time, has the least power of removing itself from the constricting agent. What we know of strangulated hernia would support this impression. There is a circumstance, however, under which sjDontaneous reduction may occur in cases of incarceration of recent standing. It is when a loop of gut has passed beneath a band and has then become so twisted as to have its lumen closed. In such a case sudden and severe symptoms may appear and yet the band without the volvulus may not suffice to strangulate the gut. As the muscular vigour of the gut becomes impaired, or is rendered feebler by the action of opium, it is possible to conceive that the volvulus may untwist and the coil escape from the band that never held it other than slightly. This may be the explanation of some of the " previous attacks " noted in cases of fatal strangulation. AVhen the strangulation is well advanced recovery by this means must be practically impossible. I have alluded to two cases where the involved gut was found to be partially reduced after death ; but in these cases the reduction had been effected by the sudden relief to distension caused by a perforation. The very cause that brought the relief but served to hasten the appearance of death. One possible factor in spontaneous recovery may be the giving way, from gangrene, of the constricting band. Post-mortem examinations afford some support to any theory based upon this circumstance. Many Chap, v.] Strangulation- bv Bands. 95 of the bands that cause obstruction are very thin, and have but a poor blood supply. They must be greatly compressed when they produce incarceration, and yet experience shows that they usually outlive the too vascular bowel. There are, however, cases where the patient seems to have been very near a prospect of spontaneous recovery when death occurred. Among these are the following : In one case of lapar- otomy performed on the third day of the acuter symptoms, the band on being handled was found to be so slender that it broke as it was being lifted up."^ In two other cases a diverticulum that had caused obstruction was found to be so softened that it was partly torn away from its point of origin, f In another case of laparotomy, that ended in cure, the diverticulum was more livid than the gut that it was compressing; and lastly,! Dr. Servier quotes an instance where the constricting band was gangrenous and on the point of rupturing. § In connection with the question of diverticula becoming gangrenous, it must be borne in mind that such an event may, instead of leading to cure, lead to death by perforation should the gangrenous part of the process be pervious. Indeed, the tearing away of the diverticle has caused fatal peritonitis, and Cazin notes a case where, througli the rent so formed, some metallic mercury that had been administered found its way into the peritoneal cavity. A specimen in St. Thomas's Hospital Museum j| shows another possible means of escape, although a very remote one. The specimen consists of a part of the small intestine of a dog, around a knuckle of which * Bull, et Mem. de la Soc. de Cliir. de Paris, 1879, page 564. + Dr. Hilton Fagge, loc. cit. ; and Dr. Wilks, Path. Soc. Trans., vol. xvi., page 126. t Bull, et Mem. de la Soc. de Chir. de Paris, 1881, page 210. § De rOcclvision Intestiuale, page -12. Liege, 1871, II No. Q 7. 96 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. vi. Mr. Travel's had, during life, firmly tied a ligature. The animal died on the third day. The ligatured part had separated and was found in a kind of cyst formed by lymph from the peritoneum. Into this cyst the two ends of the bowel opened so that the integrity of the tube was practically restored. It is conceivable that such a circumstance may occur in a young human subject when only a small knuckle of gut or a part of the circumference of the gut is very tightly strangu- lated. It is not impossible that in a favourable case the canal of the intestine may be completed after ob- struction by the formation of a " fistula bimucosa " such as has been formed in some cases of strangulated hernia. From the above speculations the conclusion may safely be drawn, that while spontaneous relief in acute obstruction may not be impossible, it must at least be excessively rare. CHAPTER YI. ANOMALOUS FORMS OF OBSTRUCTION DUE TO ISOLATED BANDS AND TO ADHESIONS. Under tins headiiig may be grouped a remarkable series of cases, all more or less infrequent, in which an obstruction has been brought about by means of an adherent diverticulum, or by an isolated band, or by more extensive adhesions, but where the mechanism of the occlusion is unlike that involved in the class just described. These cases are united by a common pathological bond, while clinically they present conspicuous differ- ences. Unlike the form of obstruction just discussed, Chap. VI.] Strangulation over a Band. 97 they involve the large bowel with almost as great a frequency as they involve the small. These anomalous cases may be classified under the following headings : 1. Strangulation over a "band. 2. Gcclusion brouglit about by acute "kinldng due to traction upon an isolated band or an adherent diverticulum. 3. Occlusion effected by udliesiuns which retain the bowel in a bent posiiion. 4. Obstruction by means of adhesions that compress the gut. 5. Obstruction by the matting toffcther of several coils of intestine. 6. Obstruction by changes effected in the intestinal walls due to simple traction. 7. Narrowing of the bowel from shriiilctng of the mesentery after inflammation. 1. StraiigiilatioiA over a band. — If several coils of a thin indiarubber J)ipe, through which water was flowing, were thrown over a tightly drawn wire, the lumen of the tube would become more or less completely occluded at the spot where the wire was crossed. It is conceivable that a similar circumstance may be met with in the abdomen when a long loop of intestine is thro^vn across a more or less rigid band. Here the weight of the dependent loops would act as a compressing agent, and the interference with the circulation in the mesenteric vessels would induce an engorgement of the involved bowel. It is difficult, however, to understand how such a form of obstruction could occur in the living subject without some arrangement of parts that would permit the dependent coils to retain their position. One would imagine that a little vigorous peristaltic movement would soon overcome the occlusion, on the one hand, and withdraw the intestine from its abnoimal situation, on the other ; although it is more than probable that the intestinal contents could enter the involved loop with much more readiness than they could leave it. I have H— 12 98 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. vi. found records of four cases where this form of ob- struction seems to have taken phice, and in one only is the mechanism of the occlusion uncomplicated. In the simplest case a diverticular band passed from the ileum to the umbilicus, and over it a coil of ileum from two to three feet in length was found to have been flung and to be hanging suspended. This coil was intensely congested, and numerous extravasations had taken place beneath its serous coat. Symptoms of obstruction appeared suddenly during perfect health, and the patient only lived ten hours.* In two other instances an extensive loop of the lower ileum had passed through a hole in the omentum. The loops were black with congestion, and were hanging down into the pelvis. In one case the coil was fixed in this position by recent adhesions. In neither of the cases was the obstruction effected by the aperture itself, the gut being very readily withdrawn at the autopsy. As the author of one of the cases (Dr. Fagge) observes, the strangulation was not due to the narrow- ness of the aperture, but to the hanging of the gait over its lower edge. In both cases the symptoms appeared suddenly ; in both acute peritonitis was found at the post-mortem ; in both the patient lived five days.f In the fourth case a diverticulum passed to be attached to the umbilicus, and over it two loops of the ileum, black with congestion, were suspended. They w^ere found to be twisted upon themselves, and it is impossible to say which was the primary and most essential j^henomenon, the volvulus or the hang- ing of the gut over the cord. The symptoms appeared suddenly, acute peritonitis set in on the sixth day, and the patient died on the ninth. \ * De rOcchision Intestinale, by Dr. Lusseau. Paris, 1870. t Bull, de la Soc. Anat., page 252; Paris, 1864; case by M. Besnicr. And Guj-'sHosp. llcports, vol. xiv.; Dr. Hilton Fagge. ; Path. 80c. Trans., vol. vii., page 205 ; case by I\Ir. AVurd. Chap. VI.] Acute Kinking. ^9 In a drawing of a case of strangulation by an adherent diverticulum, given by Bouvier, it would appear as if this form of obstruction had had great influence in producing the fatal result.* The four cases all occurred in males. The ages were respectively 22, 45, and ^'b^ the fourth case being met with in " a boy." So far as can be judged from these few cases, the symptoms resemble those of hernia-like strangulation, a sudden onset, severe pain, excessive vomiting (be- coming stercoraceous in at least one instance), and absolute constipation. In the case fatal in ten hours there was diarrhoea and profound collapse. The main points of difference between these cases and those of incarceration under a band would appear to consist in the less continuous character of the pain and in the fact that the symptoms all advance with varying intensity. These features are intelligible in the light of the fact that the obstruction in these cases must be comparatively incomplete, while the interference with the blood circulation in the bowel would be of a character to excite inordinate peristaltic move- ments. 2. Occlusion by acute kiiLkiug due to traction, — In these cases a band attached to the bowel so drags upon its point of attachment that the gut becomes acutely bent at this spot, and is ulti- mately occluded by a process akin to the kinking that may close an indiarubber tube (Fig. 1 8). This condition is usually met with in the case of a diverticulum or diverticular ligament attached to the umbilicus, or in instances where an isolated adhesion is connected with the ileum on the one hand and some more fixed and distant point on the other. The shortness of the mesentery of the lower ileum favours the formation of a kink in that part of the bowel. *Bull. lie rAcad. de Med., tome xvi., page 083, 18-51. loo Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. vi. Dr. Reignier has shown that it is possible for an unattached diverticle to cause obstruction by kinking, if the process become much distended. He found in the body of an infant a free diverticulum 7 centi- metres long. On injecting water into the gut above the process, he found that when the pressure was moderate the diverticle simply became filled and that the fluid passed readily by it. When, however, Fig. 18. the pressure was much in- creased the process dilated enormously, and so pressed upon the gut below its point of origin as to bend the intestine tranversely and finally occlude its lumen. "^^ He gi^'es a case in the j^erson of a man, aged 22, that illustrates this experiment in practice. This patient died after exhibiting for ten days tlie symptoms of acute intestinal obstruction. The autopsy showed a free diverticulum much dilated by liquid faeces, and which had so acutely bent the gut from w^hich it arose, that the lumen of the intestine M-as quite closed. On lifting the divei-ticle and gently pressing it the obstruction was at once overcome. In cases of kinking by adherent diverticula and bands it is probable that distension of the bowel may be active in brinirinj; the obstruction about. ^Moreover, distended coils of intestine may press upon the liga- ment itself and so cause it to be stretched. The following are examples of kinking produced by isolated adhesions : In a case by Louis, a band was found to pass between an o\arian cyst and the lower ileum. When the cyst was emptied by the trochar the band was stretched and so dragged upon the bowel that it was closed, and symptoms of intes- tinal obstruction developed. Heller reports a case * Bull, (le la Soc. Anat., page 279. Paris, 1879. Chap. VI.] Acute Kinking. loi where a loop of the lesser bowel was adherent to a gravid uterus. After delivery the traction upon the intestine was such that it became acutely bent and occluded. " Warren saw a pedunculated subperitoneal fibroid of the uterus so wedged in, in consequence of a sudden change of position, between the wall of the pelvis and a false ligament stretched from the lowest part of the ileum to the uterus, that the former was bent and occluded by the traction of the band attached to it." * Dr. Hilton Fagge records the case of a little girl, aged 9, in whose abdomen at the autopsy many old adhesions were found resulting from a local peritonitis set up by caseous degeneration of the mesenteric glands. Some adhesions passed between the sigmoid flexure and the ileum, others between the latter bowel and the omentum ; while the mesentery was so much shrunken as to bind the small intestine closer to the spine. The immediate cause of obstruction seems to have been due to a band that fixed the small intestine to the liver, and that caused great angular bending of the bowel. At this bend the empty and the distended coils met, while above that point was a perforation in the jejunum, f One of the best examples of obstruction by kink- ing due to an adherent diverticle is given by Dr. Wilks. The process in this case was attached to the umbilicus and had been so stretched, probably by the meteoristic state of the gut, that it had become torn and so had induced peritonitis. % The gut was normal at the seat of the acute bend, as indeed it appears to have been in all the cases belonging to this category. In Dr. Wilks' case the dragging of the empty and pendulous coils below the attachment of the diverticle appears to have helped in maintaining the obstruction. * Leichtenstern, loc. cit., page 530. tPath. Soc. Trans., vol. xxvii., page 157. X Ibid., vol. xvi., page 126. 102 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. vi. Dr. Quain* reports the following case iii a woman aged 53: A large perinephritic abscess had been opened, to the wall of which the descending colon was adherent. The patient died with symptoms of obstruction lasting twelve days. The adlierent colon was found to have been so bent by the collapse of the al)scess wall as to have become occluded. So far as can be judged from the few cases pub- lished, the sijmjjtoms due to kinking of the bowel are very nearly identical with those of strangulation under a band. The onset is usually less abrupt and the progress of the case less acute, patients living eleven, fifteen, and twenty days in some instances. The sym^Dtoms also are such as would suggest that the occlusion is not absolute. Thus the pain, although severe, will present very unequal degrees of intensity ; the -somit- ing, although often incessant and distressing and stercoraceous, may abate ; the meteorism, even in cases of long duration, may be quite slight. The constipation, moreover, although usually complete, may yield a little, and the bowels be 0})ened by an aperient even when the symptoms of obstruction have lasted eight days, as in Dr. Fagge's case. 3. Occlusions by adhesions that retain the boAvei in a bent position.— In these cases, which concern both the large and the small intestine, the gut is found to have become adherent to some fixed point in such a way that a more or less acute bend is produced. The site of the adhesion is on the abdominal or pelvic parietes or the pelvic viscera. It may be on the liver. The usual cause of the adhesion is either pelvic peritonitis or hernia. In the case of the rupture, the part of bowel adherent is the same that occupied the hernia. The condition is met witli, tlierefore, only after enteroceles, and only " I'atli. Soc. Trans., vol, v., ^lage 179. Chap, vi.i Bending of the Bowel. 103 after such as have been stranguhited or inflamed. The })o\v('l, presenting in any case some inflammation of its serous coat, is reduced into the abdomen, and instead of remaining free in that cavity, contracts adhesions by means of its inflamed surface with some otlier part of the 2)eritoneum. In every case of this kind, so far as I am aware, the adhesion of the bowel has been to the parietes in the vicinity of the hernial orifice. The bowel, having been recently herniated, usually acquires an adhesion in a bent position, and when so fixed often leads to further intestinal troubles, in cases where strangulated or inflamed hernire have been successfully reduced. The condition usually occurs after femoral ruptures, inasmuch as such hernia? are peculiarly prone to become incarcerated or inflamed, while the com- paratively small amount of gut they usually contain favours the formation of these particular adliesions. Among other, and less frequent, causes of these attachments may be noticed peritoneal cancer, and, so far as attachments to the liver are concerned, the local trouble excited by gall stones. It is a singular coincidence that pelvic peritonitis, femoral hernia, peritoneal cancer, and gall stones are all much more common in women than in men, and this serves to explain the fact that the present form of intestinal obstruction is practically limited to females. Out of the fifteen cases that I have collected there is one instance only in a male. In this isolated example the adhesions had followed upon some local mischief excited by tapping tlie bladder above the pubes.* All the cases occurred in adults, the youngest patient l)eing a woman of thirty (pelvic peritonitis), the oldest M woman of fifty-nine (omental cancer). * Dr. Briddoii ; Ncu- York Med. Jour., vol. xxxii., 1SS2, pasi-e UG. 104 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chnp. vi. The involved gut is usually adherent at one isolated spot only, and a single and simple angular bend is thus produced. This is the condition met with in those cases that depend upon hernia. In other instances the attachment may he more extensive, as in a case of Dr. Fagge's, where one foot of the lower ileum was found adherent to the anterior abdominal parietes as a result of omental cancer. Moreover, the bends formed in the bowel may be by no means simple. There may be several angular bends, the loops being adherent at more points than one, and made to assume the outline of the letter \^* This arrangement may be still further complicated by the matting together of the three bars of the intestinal N, whereby the false position is perpetuated. In one case where N-like bends were produced only four inches of bowel were involved, so that the angles formed were very acute and abrupt, f A few examples may be given to illustrate the varieties assumed l>y this form of intestinal obstruc- tion. The convexity of the ascending colon may become adherent to the o\'ary, and the gut be so narrowed at the bend as barely to admit a crow-quill. \ The transverse colon may become adherent to the fundus uteri. § The rectum may attach itself to a cancerous ovary, and present in consequence a very angular bend. || The sigmoid flexure may adhere to a uterus the seat of a malignant disease, and present so abrupt a bend that fatal obstruction with symptoms like those of volvulus may ensue.** * Case by ^I. Cossy, quoted by M. Nouet ; De rOcchision Intestinale dans ses Rapports avec les Inflammations pdri-uterines chroniques. Paris, 1874. t Louis ; Archiv. Gen. de Med., l^^ Serie, tom^e xiv., page 193. i Ducliaussoy, M^m. sur I'Anat. Path, des Etrang. Internes, 1860. ^ Dr. Hilton Fagge, loc. cit. Ij Path. Boc. Trans., vol. xvi., page 197. ** M. Cossy ; i\I<'m. de la Soc. d'Observat, 185*), tome iii. Chap, vi.j Bending of the Bowel. 105 The period of time that may intervene between the formation of the adhesion and the occurrence of symptoms of intestinal obstruction varies greatly. In the case following aspiration of the bladder just alluded to, evidences of ol)struction appeared within a few days of the original lesion. In the great majority of cases the intestinal symptoms do not make their appearance until months after the initial peritonitis. I think tliat in the cases due to hernia a somewhat earlier appearance is usual, a matter in most instances of weeks rather than of months. Sometimes years have elapsed between the causative inflammation and the symptoms of obstruction, such examples being most usual in the large intestine. Many of the patients have been the victims of chronic constipation for years before the final occlusion occurred. At the same time it must be noted that adhesions of the same character as those now under consideration have been met with in the autopsies of patients who presented no marked intestinal symptoms during life. The mechanism of the obstruction in these cases varies, and may be conveniently considered under three categories, taken in order of severity. 1. The gut at the adherent point may become so bent that occlusion by kinking is produced. This is, as a rule, met with in the lowest part of the colon. The symptoms induced are severe and sudden in their onset. Their abrupt development possibly depends upon sudden occlusion at the bend, brought about by some distension of the bowel, or some change in its position. 2. The bowel (a portion always of the small intestine) is adherent over a small area, and symptoms of obstruction follow from certain effects of traction without conspicuous occlusion of the lumen of the tube. It is certain that, so far as the lesser bowel is concerned, mere adhesion over a limited district tends to cause an impediment to the passage of matter. io6 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. vi. The gut at the adherent spot cannot exercise its peristaltic function. It becomes a more or less inert segment in an active tube. If a little acute mischief be excited about the seat of the adhesions, symptoms of an acute or subacute character may arise, the exact pathogenesis of which is a little obscure. That form of rupture known as Littre's hernia throws some light upon these cases. In this hernia the gut is tightly held down, a part only of its circumference is nipjDed, and yet symptoms of acute mtestinal obstruction follow, the greater part of the lumen of the bowel being at the time often quite unoccluded. Supposing a patient to have a loop of intestine adherent to the parietes, and that some little inflam- matory trouble is excited about the adherent knuckle, it would seem as if symptoms of subacute obstruction could arise somewhat upon parallel lines to those that produce the manifestations in Littre's hernia. In the case following asi:>iration of the bladder some local ]ieri- tonitis kejit up after the gut had become adherent was apparently suflicient to lead, in combination with the bent bowel, to rather acute evidences of obstruction. In other instances violent peristaltic movements, such as may occur during colic or diarrhoea, may cause a rough dragging upon the attached intestine, and so add, as it were, the fuse to a train already laid and prepared. The effect of a little local peritonitis in rendering a peritoneal obstruction an actual one is often illustrated. As one example I might cite the following : An old man was admitted into the London Hospital under the care of my colleague Mr. Rivington. The patient had received a blow upon the abdomen. A few days after admission he developed symptoms of acute obstruction, of which he died in less than two days. At the autopsy the transverse colon was found to be bent upon itself and retained in that position by old adhesions. In no place was the lumen Chap. VI.] Bending of the Bowel. 107 of the bowel occluded. The peritoneum was healthy save at one spot over the liver where there was a little local peritonitis."^ As regards the cases now under notice, it can only be said that patients may die of more or less acute obstruction, and exhibit at the autopsy an adherent and bent intestine about which some little peritoneal mischief is evident, while the lumen of the bowel is at no point wholly or even nearly occluded. 3. The adherent bowel may offer a more or less definite mechanical obstacle to the passage of its contents. A part of the colon may present so sharp and rigid a bend as to give to the involved intestine the properties of a stricture. This condition is well illustrated by a case reported by Dr. Owen Eees, where the rectum was so involved.! In other instances the bowel, and particularly the lesser bowel, is adherent over a wide area, and the mere inertness of the attached portion constitutes an obstruction. This is well seen in those cases Avhere the bowel is adherent,' in a contorted position, as when it assumes an N-like outline and the limbs of the N are bound together, or when sevei-al inches of it are blended in a straight line with the parietes, as in Dr. Fagge's case quoted above. Here the bowel above the diseased part has not only to pass its own contents along, but has to force them also through \h^ inert and adherent segment. The longer this segment the more marked the obstruction. When closely bound down, the involved gut must be practically incapable of peri- staltic movement, and must be to the rest of the bowel as a piece of thin indiarubber tubing. Pathological reports and museum specimens well illustrate this. The adherent bowel is either of normal aspect or is abnormally thin, while the intestine above it shows a *ror an account of this case see par. 5 of this chapter. \Mcd. Times and Gazette, vol, i., 1869, page 436. io8 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. vi. hypertrophy of its walls that may, in some instances, be extreme."^ The gut, moreover, just above the inert part often shows some ulceration of the mucous membrane, due presumedly to the imtation of accumu- lated matters. The hypertrophy is all in the muscular coat and compares conspicuously with the thin walls of the inert and adherent segment. Moreover, when there is much angular bending of the gut the contents of the bowel have to be not only forced through an inert tube, but have to take a devious course and encounter certain definite obstructions. The symptoms associated with this form of ob- struction will obviously show great variation. They may assume an acute, or a subacute or a chronic aspect, and may differ somewhat, according to whether the occlusion is situate in the larcre or the small intestine. A. In the colon. — If the obstruction be due to a sudden closure of the gut by kinking at the already bent and adherent part the symptoms may be of a very acute character. This condition appears to most usually occur in connection with the sigmoid flexure or rectum, and the manifestations produced are identical with and cannot be distinguished from volvulus of the former segment of the bowel. I might give one illustration. A woman, aged forty-four, was admitted into the London Hospital under my care suffering from symptoms of acute obstruction. These symptoms had appeared suddenly after taking an aperient. They were precisely the symptoms of volvulus of the sigmoid flexure. The patient had been the subject of some constipation for years, and had had attacks of colic occasionally. In twenty- four hours after the onset the woman was in a precarious condition. I performed laparotomy, but she died twelve hours afterwards. The rectum was adherent to one * See case by Louis quoted above. Chap. Vi.] Sending of the Bowel. 109 point of the pelvic wall in a bent position. The bend here had become so extreme that the gut was entirely occluded. The colon above was enormously distended, and the sigmoid flexure reached to the right of and above the umbilicus. On emptying the colon by puncture, and breaking through the adhesions, the passage in the bowel was soon restored. The cause of the adhesion w^as a trifling stricture, which had helped to make the sudden closure by kinking more complete. The symptoms may be subacute, as in a case reported by M. Cossy, where the sigmoid flexure was adherent to a cancerous ovary. Here the final attack lasted some eight or nine days, and was marked by paroxysmal pain with idsible peristalsis, by slight non- stercoraceous vomiting, and by constipation reKeved by an occasional stool. In other instances the mani- festations may be quite chronic, and may resemble in all points those due to stricture of the rectum. A case of this character has been reported by Mr. Heath. He performed lumbar colotomy on the twentieth day of the constipation. The rectum was adherent to the uterus and ovary (which was the seat of cancer), and was bent into a sharp sigmoid form."* B. In the small intestine. — The symptoms when the obstruction is in this part of the bowel may be acute or chronic. A more or less typical example of each form may be given. I saw, in consultation with Dr. Towne of Kingsland, a woman, aged 58, who three months previously had had some inflammation about a small femoral hernia. The bowel was reduced at the time, and, to her surprise, had never come down again, nor given her any trouble. She was, when seen, sufiering from intestinal obstruction; the onset had not been sudden. She had much pain of a markedly paroxysmal character. She vomited at first at long intervals, bringing up large quantities of *Patli. Soc, Trans., vol. xvi., page 197. i I O InTES TINA L ObS TR UC TION. [Chap. VI . matter. As the case progressed the vomiting became more frequent (every two or three hours) and feculent. She had constipation that was absolute but for one slight liquid motion passed during the first few days of the attack. I performed laparotomy on the seventh day, and found a coil of greatly distended ileum adherent in a bent position to the vicinity of the femoral ring. The adhesions retaining it were readily broken down and the abdomen then closed. She never vomited after the operation; a very copious motion was passed on the fourth day and the patient made a perfect recovery. In Dr. Fagge's case, quoted above, where a foot of the ileum was adherent to the parietes, the symptoms lasted some five months. There was constipation that alternated with diarrhoea, vomiting that appeared late in the case, and that came on once or twice in the twenty-four hours, the patient bringing up immense quantities each time, and pain of a very marked paroxysmal character. There was a dragging pain about the lower part of the abdomen. The vomited matters became stercoraceous six days before death. It will be seen that in both cases there are evidences of incomplete obstruction. The constipation alternates with an occasional motion. In some of the other less acute cases the patient, when not al>solutely constipated, passed many scanty and very liquid stools. The vomiting is not severe at first, and occurs at long intervals. The abdominal pain is paroxysmal. There is a dragging pain about the part to w^iicli the gut is adherent. There is not much distension of the abdomen. In the chronic cases the movements of the intestinal coils are visible. In one instance, where the ileum was adherent to the ovary and formed many angular bends, an irritable diarrhoea took the place of the more usual constipation, and the patient only vomited twice fciiap. vi.i Compression by Adhesions. tii during the month that immediately preceded her death. Such a case hardly comes clinically under the category of intestinal obstruction. 4. Obstructions t>y means of adhesions tliat compress the g^ut.— Peritoneal adhesions, when favourably placed, may undergo considerable contrac- tion. When placed upon the bowel these false membranes may, by their shrinking, so compress the intestine as to seriously narrow its lumen. Exjoeri- ence demonstrates a fact that might have been anti- cipated, viz. that this form of constriction is most usually met with about the most fixed segments of the intestine, that is to say, about the ascending and descending colon, and the hepatic and splenic flexures. The process involved in certain of these cases where the colon is concerned is intelligible enough. Thus, says Leichtenstern, " A circumscribed, chronic, con- stricting peritonitis is sometimes found at the flexures of the colon. As the results of atony of the muscu- lar coat repeated fsecal accumulations are found espe- cially at the flexures, the points where the obstacles to the advance of the fseces are greater. TJie frequently repeated irritation of the peritoneum pro- duced thereby excites chronic peritonitis, which may result in constriction. In other cases the chronic peritonitis starts from the concavity of the liver and extends to the flexura hepatica ; it is set up at the former point by gall stones, neoplasms, etc., or is the continuation of a cirrhotic process in the liver, or of a portal periphlebitis. In the left hypochondrium we sometimes find, together with numerous splenic adhesions and fibrous perisplenitis, the splenic flexure adherent and constricted by chronic fibrous perito- nitis."* In other instances the cause of the con- stricting peritonitis is not so evident. An example of such cases is afforded by a specimen in the London * Loc. cit. , page 632. 1 12 IntestiN'al Obstruction. [Chap. vi. Hospital * (Fig. 22). Here the ascending colon just above the csecum is narrowed by an isolated patch of contracting adhesions so as to produce considerable stenosis. It is probable that in this case, and in others like it, the limited peritoneal inflammation has been induced by an ulcer of the mucous membrane, although the evidence of this in the present specimen is not clear. The association of cicatricial strictures of the bowel with a constricting peritonitis is well known, and is illustrated by a vast number of recorded cases and museum specimens. A specimen in Guy's Hospital affords a good example of a constriction at the splenic flexure due to adhesions, f In some of these instances the patient has given a history of a previous attack of enteritis. The extent to which the bowel is naiTow^ed in these cases is often considerable. In some the aftected colon would barely admit the tip of the little finger. In others it would only admit a crow-quill. In a singular specimen from the College of Surgeons Museum, one of the appendices epiploicae has contracted such an adhesion to the attached omentum as to cause constriction of the bowel. | I have found but few examples of this form of obstruction in the small intestine. In every instance there has been some complication in the case. The affected bowel is always adherent to the parietes or to the pelvic viscera. In two cases reported by Dr. Fagge (in one of which the ileum was involved and in the other the jejunum) adhesions existed elsewhere, and the final obstruction was complicated by angular bending of the intestine about the point of its at- tachment.§ Mr. Gay has reported a case where eight * London Hospital Museum, No. Ae. 84. t Guy's Hosp. Museum, No. 1,852. t Coll. of Surgeons Museum, No. 1,302. f Loc. cit. Chap, vf.] Matting of the Bowels. ^^3 inches of tlie ileum were adherent to the fundus of a uterus '' in a state of scirrhous degeneration." The intestine so involved was so narrowed as to barely admit a goose-quill.* It is doubtful if this case would fall under the present category. As regards the symptoms incident to this vaiiety of obstruction, it can only be said that they more or less completely resemble those due to stricture of the bowel. In the case of the colon this assertion may be made without reservation. In the case of the small intestine the manifestations of the disease appear to exhibit a more rapid development than is usual in stricture, the permanent stenosis being complicated by the effects of angular bending. 5. Obstriictioii hy tlie iiiattiiBs; to^ethor of intestinal eoils.— The many cases that can be classed under this category present a protean aspc-ct. 1. The small intestine. — The coils of the lesser bowel may be matted together in many different ways. In one set of cases a small segment of the gut is so adherent as to form a permanent and un- changing loop. In another set of cases, many coils, involving often a considerable tract of the intestine, are matted together so as to form more or less complicated masses. In both instances the involved coils are usually quite free from adhesions to the parietes or to other viscera. In the Ji7'st set of cases a simple per- manent loop is formed in the bowel. This loop may be open, the walls of tlie gut being adherent only at the extremities of the loop (Fig. 19a and Fig. 20), f or it may be closed, the walls of the involved bowel being *Path. Soc. Trans., vol. iii., page 108. t Guy's HosiJ. Museum Eeports, 183G, page 21. 1—12 114 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. vi. adherent in their entire extent (Fig. 19 b). The latter variety involves a much smaller amount of intestine Fig. 20. — Adhesions forming the Bowel into a Loop. A probe Is introduced into a perforation in tbc intestine. i-han does the former.* There are several distinct condi- tions under which these distortions of the bowel may be produced. Many are the results of hemise. If a coil of good size be involved in a rupture and much *For specimens of these loops see St. Bart.'s Hosp. Miiseum, No. 2,100 ; Path Soc. Trans,, vol. x., case by Mr. Birkett ; and St. Thomas's Hosp. Museum, Q No. 128. Chap. VI.] Intestinal Loops. ^'5 compressed by the hernial orifice, adhesions may form at the point compressed, and a permanent open loop be formed after the gut has been reduced. If the her- niated coil be small (a mere knuckle) a closed loop m^j result from the adhesions produced l^y inflamma- tion of the serous coat. Then again an ulcer of the mucons membrane may, by inducing a limited peritonitis, lead to the forma- tion of a loop. If the adhesions are scanty and iso- lated, an open loop is produced as in Fig. 20 ; if extensive, a closed loop as in the si^ecimen (N^o. Q 1 28) in St. Thomas's Hospital Museum. In other cases the loop-prodncing adhesions are the result of mesenteric gland disease, and I have seen two preparations where a broken down or caseous gland has occupied the angle formed by the two limbs of the loop. Sometimes a fistulous passage connects the cavities of the two portions of bowel at the root or narrow part of the loop. Such a passage is known as a fistula biniu- cosa. They most frequently result from idiopathic ulcers of the intestine, but may follow also from the destructive processes induced by compres- sion."^ One of the most remarkable cases of fistula bimucosa is aftbrded by a report of Dr. Bris- towe's in the Pathological So- ciety's Transactions t (Fig. 21). Here the transverse colon communicated with the ileum at two points through a cavity whose walls were formed *Path. Soc. Trans., vol. x. ; Mr. Birkett's case, t Vol. xiv., 1863, page 201. Fig. 21. — Fistula Bimucosa, with formation of a Loop in tlie Ileum. ii6 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. vi. Fig. 22.— Stenosis of ascendingr Colon from the contraction of Peritoneal Adhesions. Chap. VI.] Intestinal Loops. ii7 by firm adhesions. The patient died with symptoms of phthisis and dysenteric diarrhoea, and there is little doubt but that the primary mischief was caused by a perforating ulcer of the transverse colon. It does not appear that the open loop ever of itself leads to definite obstruction. In cases where a fistula bimucosa exists a fatal perforatioi). may form in the gut above the seat of the sinus. This may be due to fresh ulceration of the bowel formed independently of any obstruction effects. In Mr. Birkett's example of a fistula bimucosa following a strangulated rupture, a like termination to the case ensued, although the cause of the perforation in this instance was not evi- dent. The open loop may become twisted, and so cause obstruction, while it forms an excellent point d'appui around which a normal coil may become in- volved in a volvulus. Sir Astley Cooper, in his treatise on hernia, mentions a case where " two folds of intestine had adhered at one point only (as may be represented by bringing the points of the thumb and finger in contact). Through the noose thus formed another fold of intestine had passed, and had become strangulated." The closed loop very usually leads to obstruction of the intestine. Here the adherent bowel is so acutely bent that a fold of mucous membrane projects into the lumen of the intestine, and offers a valve-like impediment to the passage of matters (Fig. 23 a). The gut above the bend in time enlarges from disten- sion until it forms an actual ampulla (Fig. 23 b) and so renders the passage of the contents of the bowel still more difficult. A remarkable case fully reported by M. Nicaise "^ affords an example of this, and from his case Fio^. 23 b is taken. In this case the ampulla was so large that the lower segment of the *Bull. et Mem. de la Soc. de Chir. de Paris, tome vi., 1880, page 582. ii8 Intestinal Obstruction. [Chap. VI. these with upon bowel appeared to issue fiom the side of it rather than from the end. The parts are compared by M. Nicaise to the c?ecum and the entering ileum. The aperture was valve-like, and just admitted the tip of the index finger. The patient, a man aged twenty -five, had been operated upon for a strangulated inguinal hernia five years before the fatal obstruction came on. The symptoms in cases may be classed those that depend stricture of the lesser bowel^ although they are perhaps liable to more acute modes of termination."^ In M. Nicaise's case the patient had been troubled during the five years that followed the reduction of his hernia with attacks of colic, with occasional vomiting and with diarrhoea, alternating with constipation. Eight days before the man's death, which occurred shortly after an enterotomy had been performed, he was seized with somewhat acute symptoms associated with much vomiting, with occasional action of the bowels, but with no abdominal tenderness, and with little jDain. The movements of the intestinal coils were visible through the parietes. The fatal issue had probably been provoked by the administration of purgative medicines which had hurried much intestinal matter into the amjjulla and so produced the obstruction. Apropos of these cases, one might notice an B Fig. 23. * M. Bricheteau (Bull, de la Soc. Anat. Je Paris, 1862, page 257) rwjiorts a case of occlusion by a closed loop, the exact cause of ■which is obsciH-e, where the patient died with acute symptoms in twelve days. cW- VI.] Matting of the Bowels. tip instance of obstruction of the lesser bowel by a large gall-stone where the gut at the obstructed point was bent upon itself and the bend retained in a fixed position by adhesions, apparently of recent formation.* In the second set of cases, alluded to at the com- mencement of this paragraph, certain coils of the intestine are found matted together in a confused mass. The condition is similar to that met with in chronic tubercular peritonitis, from which, however, it must be distinguished. The tubercular affection involves the whole mass of the intestine and is a diffused process. In the present set of cases the causative peritonitis is quite local and only a portion of the lesser bowel is involved. The adherent coils usually form a roundish mass, which may be almost as distinct as a tumour, and which compares con- spicuously w^ith the uninvolved and normal bowel. The matted intestine may also be adherent to the parietes, or it may be quite free. Sometimes the matting is brought about by a multitude of isolated adhesions. In other cases the coils are enveloped in fine membranous adhesions so that they may appear as if enclosed in a bag of tough tissue paper. An example of this latter condition is afforded by Fig. 24. Some of the coils in the mass may be of normal lumen, others may be dilated, and many may be compressed. They are commonly strangely distorted. When obstruction has been caused, the bowel entering the mass will be found dilated, w^hile that leaving it will be more or less shrunken. The amount of gut involved varies. It may be but a few inches, as in a case reported by M. Julliard, where six inches only were involved,! or it may be several feet as in an *Dr. Van der Byl; Path. Soc. Trans., vol. viii., page 231. An almost precisely similar case, minus the adhesions, is reported by Dr. Draper, Neio York Medical Journal, 1882, j)agel7. + Bull. et Mem, de la Soc. de Chir., Paris, tome v., 1872, page 627. 120 Intestinal Obstruction. [chap. vi. instance recorded by Dr. Bristowe, where nearly one half of the ileum was found matted into a confused mass.^ In several instances a part of the colon has been involved in the adhesions, as was the case in a specimen described by Mr. Sydney Jones, where the coils of the lower ileum were not only matted together but were adherent also to the ceecum.f Fig, 24.— Diffused Peritoneal Adhesions. Various forms of local peritonitis have led to this condition of the bowels. It has followed after opera- tions upon strangulated hernia, aftei* ovariotomy, after pelvic peritonitis, and peritonitis due to other lesions than operation wounds. In one case at least the intestines were found matted together by a peri- toneal inflammation induced by cancer of the bowel itself. I *Path. Soc. Trans., vol. viii., page 200. •\L