hi " ^V?^,^•f^-?< cf.-^<vV \ tyi- ;, 6 itL ~^-^ 2 xK.'^i-'-c:: nrlK'': ' .' «^ r*' ' . A ^ i. it i* J" -^..'J,'', THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. EDINBURGH : PEINTEL. BY THOMAS CONSTABLE FOR EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS. LONDON . . . HAMILTON, ADAMS. & CO. CAMBRIDGE . MACMILLAN & CO. DUBLIN . . . W. ROBERTSON. GLASGO"W . . JAMES MACLEHOSE. T' THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS, 1638-88. BY JAMES DODDS. SECOND EDITION. EDINBURGH: EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS. 18G0. PREFACE. The following Work was origiually prepared as a Course of Lectures, which I have delivered, at intervals of leisure, in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Liverpool, and several other of our large towTis. This will account for the direct style of address which frequently occurs through- out the volume. It will be seen that this little work does not pretend to be an exhaustive history of the period selected, or properly a history at all. It is only a series of de- scriptive sht^tches, meant to represent in outline the successive phases of the Covenanting Struggle. Tlie subject is a noble one for a history, having an epic completeness — a beginning, middle, and end — with its clearly-defined half century ; and I hope that some one having more ability, and more time than I luue for literary' labour, will yet undertake the task. The main body of the narrative has been based on a careful collation of the best authorities — those con- temporary or nearly contemporary with the (ivents. VI PEEFACE. Amongst the host consulted and analysed, I may name the following : — Clarendon, Burnet, Kirkton, Wodrow, and Neal ; Principal Baillie's Letters, Sir James Bal- four's Historical Works, Bishop Guthrie's Memoirs, and Scot of Scotstarvet's Scottish Statesmen ; Scottish Sta- tutes edited by Thomson, and Records of the Kirk edited by Peterkin ; Strafford Papers, Miscellanea Scotica, Memoirs of Yeitch and others edited by M'Crie, Dal- rymple's Memoirs, and sundry old Memoirs of received authenticity ; contemporary Journals, Tracts, Poems, and Songs, edited by worthy, faithful, modest David Laing, and other devoted antiquarians ; the various Club and Society publications, Bannatyne, Maitland, Spalding, Wodrow, &c. &c. Among the writings, more specially Covenantinff, were the following : — Naphtali, Patrick Walker's Lives of Cargill and others, Shields' Life of Renwick, Faithful ( .^ontendings, containing the Minutes and Letters of the United Societies, Informatory Vindication of the Societies, Collection of Sermons by Cameron and others, Renwick' s Letters, and Howie's various compilations, of considerable authority as to personal incidents and anecdotes, ' I have anxiously compared the conclusions at which I have arrived in regard to facts, with the conclusions of our modern historians — Fox, M'Crie, Hallam, Guizot, iiid Macaulay. As to the/acAs, I think there is now PREFACE. Vll little difterence. The difierence will in general onlj^ be speculative, in the differing views and estimates of men and events which different persons will always form, very much according to the leanings and predispositions of their own minds. I have also had the privilege — so invaluable to the modern historical inquirer — of examining the documents of the period in the State Paper Office. I regret that I could only do this imperfectly, owing to the pressure of business, but I received great light and assistance from the examination so far as it proceeded. In common, I believe, with all who have pursued their researches in that Office, I cannot too warmly ex- press my sense of the liberality and kindness which I there experienced. It seems a model of a Public De- partment, not only from the richness of its stores, and the simplicity and method of its arrangements, but from the courtesy, intelligence, zeal, and skilled proficiency of the gentlemen who have the charge of it. This Work having been prepared at first as a course of popular lectures, and not with a view to publication, my collection and analysis of authorities were jotted do-\\Ti on detached scraps of paper, and I cannot now, without much difficulty, retrace and recover them. I have not therefore attempted to load the page with an array of references, but I have already specified the Vlll PEEFACE. principal sources from which I have drawn my narra- tion of facts. "Where, however, I have quoted, or have derived information from Manuscripts, or from the State Paper Documents, I have noted the circumstance in foot-notes. Although averse from the obtrusion of personal feel- ings, yet I cannot part with these Lectures, even in a form in which I hope they may be more usefid, without some half-regrets. The delivery of them during the past four years, as a relief from sterner work, has been a remarkable era in a humble life. They have brought to me from large numbers of my countrymen tokens of attention and regard, which have excited my surprise no less than gratitude, and have established many friend- ships which I trust will sweeten the rest of existence. J. D. Westminster, June 1860. CONTENTS. I, PAut, like rocks and trunks of trees 24 THE FIFTY YEAES' STRUGGLE OF tumbled into the bed of a moiintaiu stream, the only effect was to dam up and increase the volume of the water, and add to the force and fury of the torrent, by which everything was at length swejjt away. Charles, on his accession, entered upon this inherit ance of Scottish difficulties. On the side of the Pre- latists were the employees of the Crown, many of the University people, and tliose of the upper classes who were in any way attached to the Court. On the side of the Presbyterians were the mass of burghers and common people, the more popular and active of the working clergy, most of the country gentlemen, and some of the nobles who were descended of old Eeforma- tion families— the representatives of the old " Lords of the Congregation." But the nobility, as a class, had been exposed to the weakening and debauching influence of James's kingcraft ; they had waxed rather indifferent to the " good old cause ;" and, with careful manage- ment, many, if not most of them, would have followed Charles blindly in the routine of mechanical loyalty, reck- ing nought whether he declared for Presbyterianism or Prelacy in Scotland. But with that dementedness which precedes destruc- tion, Charles commenced his rule in Scotland by rousing against him both the Nobles and the Presbyterians at once, and driving them, not otherwise necessarily con- nected, into a common confederacy, which was sure to prove his ruin. In those ancient times, when rent-rolls did not mount to tlie figure they now do, the nobles mo.de their fortunes THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 25 cliiefly from holding the gTeat offices of state. On the other hand, their most valuable possessions were the t'hiirch lands and teinds, which, though nominally an- nexed to the Cro\\Ti, their ancestors had (?ontrived to get into their clutches on the downfal of the Popish hierarchy. But Charles filled the offices of state with his creatures, the bishops ; whilst, to provide at once a fund for the prelatic clergy, and a reversion for himself — now reduced to every shift for money, so as to escape from his unruly Parliaments — he passed certain measures (too minute and intricate to be here explained) for the resumption of the church-lands and teinds, or for their compulsory sale at a low price. In both these ways, by withholding from them the offices of state, and by seeking to strip them of so much of their lands and revenues, he impoverished, insulted, and irritated his nobility ; also, by obtaining the superiorities of all those lands, he would augouent the military power of the Crown, and lessen that of the nobility, who would thus be deprived of so many of their vassals. A contemporary letter (of 1st April 1638), amongst the Conway Papers, describes this as part of the design. After speaking of certain pro- clamations which had been delivered to Traquair, the king's commissioner to Scotland, to be published there or not, according to circumstances, the wTiter continues, — " The other proclamation to be published was, to free all those men in Scotland that hold their lands of their lords, and that they should hold those lands of the king upon much easier conditions than they hold of their lords. ... It is possible the commonalty would fall 26 THE FIFTY YEAKS' STRUGGLE OF off from the lords, for the strength of the Scotch nobility is mostly in these tenures. The Earl of Argjde, by virtue of these tenures, having a huge command of men, above 20,000 as is supposed." ^ It so happened, that the commeucemeut of the new reign had been marked by the appearance of a new and fresh generation of noblemen, and of men whose natural sphere was in the administration of public affairs. The old generation seemed to have died out with King James. The great families, patrimonial and political, were now mostly represented by men in the prime of life, ranging from about twenty to forty years of age ; many of them able, subtle, and ambitious, eager for distinction, eager for illustrious position ; some of them generous and patriotic, well fitted at once to adorn and benefit the State, and all impatient of exclusion from places of trust and dignity, and of promotion of the favourites and lackeys of the Court. There were such names as Rothes, Balmerino, Loudon, JMontrose, Melville, Lindsay, Lothian, — almost all the nobles, except the Hamiltons and Gor- dons, who pretended to be fast friends of the king. Amongst the leaders of the nobility at the beginning, there w^as the impulsive, gay, and facile Kothes, " of u pleasant and jovial humour," says Clarendon, but en- trapped in a few years by the bait of a lordship of the bed-chamber, and a promised marriage with the rich Countess of Devonshire. There was the pi'ouiily-aspu'ing Montrose, who made a dash into the first swellings of the tide, hoping to find power, where bold hearts so 1 State Paper Office. THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. '2 i often find it, in the niidst of national confusion ; but lie was too lofty to play any second part, and speedily revolted fi"om a cause where Leslie held the baton, and Argyle directed the mace. And there was Loudon, a born orator and manager of men, with the long sagacious face, and lambent-speaking eye, who trode the wild paths of revolution agile and clean as the himter of the Alps, — in force of mind, in varied practical talent, in knowledge of his country's constitution, in far-seeing wisdom, in prudence, in nervous eloquence, the Pym of Scotland, and superior to his English compeer in the arts and graces which captivate men and win them over to one's wUl ; but whose voice, generally smooth and l)ersuasive, could rise when the tempest rose, as when he thus sounded the blast of a nation's defiance against the threats of royalty : " We know no other bond betwixt a king and his subjects but religion and law ; if these be broken, men's lives are not dear to them : such fears are passed with us for ever !" When any crisis therefore should arise (and was not the atmosphere laden with presages of a coming tempest ?), be sure the Scottish nobles, with their high blood and youthful impetuosity, would be found amongst the most implac- able foes of the king. His contumelious and impolitic treatment of the aristocracy — that shrewd contemporary observer. Sir James Balfour, declares — " was the ground - stone of all the mischief that followed after, ])oth to the king's government and family." After many premonitory acts, which excited general 28 THE FIFTY YEATJS' STRUGGLE OF distrust and alarm, the king introduced into Scotland, by his own sole prerogative, without any other sanction, a Book of Canons for the regulation of the Church, by which the Presbyterian polity was completely subverted, as well as the civil rights and privileges of the people invaded ; and he followed up this by a Liturgy, framed under the auspices of Laud, largely impregnated with Romish conceits, wdiich contradicted and shocked all Scottish ideas and habits in the matter of religious wor- ship, and many of their most solemn religious convictions. This was in 1637. The national mind was outraged. There was an immediate rush to Edinburgh of supplicants against those innovations, from all parts of the country. Bishop Guthrie acknowledges, — " Besides the increase of noblemen who had not been formerly there, there were few or no shires on the south side of the Grampian hills from which came not gentlemen, burghers, ministers, and commons." To guide, control, and give combined effect to this movement, the people formed under a central body, composed of all the opposition nobles, of two gentlemen for every county, one minister from every Presbytery, and one or two commissioners from every burgh. Each class, nobles, gentry, ministers, and bur- gesses, sat and consulted separately, meeting from time to time for joint conference. Hence this body w^as called " The Tables," the real interim government of Scotland. To confront and avenge the insolence of tyranny which had been displayed, the people, under the guidance of " The Tables," rose in a mass, joined heart and hand, and, as one man, swore and subscribed the National Covenant. THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 20 By this memorable document, first publicly read and subscribed in the Greyfriars' Church of Edinburgh, ori the hist day of Feliruary 1038, the noblemen, barous, gentlemen, burgesses, ministers, and commons, under subscribing, express their resolution — " All the days of our life constantly to adhere unto and to defend the true religion," and " to labour, by all means lawful, to re- cover the purity and liberty of the gospel, as it was established and professed" before the introduction of the late innovations ; " and that we shall defend the same, and resist all these contrary errors and corruptions, ac- (^ording to our vocation, and to the utnujst of that power tliat God hath put into our hands, all the days of our life." They pledge themselves, " that we shall, to the utmost of our power, witli our means and lives, stand t( » the defence of our dread sovereign tlie king's majesty, his person and authority, in tlie defence and preservation of the foresaid true religion, liberties, and laws of the kingdom ; as als(j to the nuitual defence and assistance every one of us of another, so that whatsoever shall be done to the least of us for that cause shall be taken as done to us all in general, and to every one of us in l>articular ; and that we shall, neither directly nor indi- rectly suffer ourselves to be divided or witlidrawu, l^y whatsoever suggestion, combination, allurement, or terror, from our blessed and loyal conjunction." They engage, " for ourselves, our followers, and all other under us, i)oth in public, in (jur particular families and i)ersonal carriage, to endeavour to keep ourselves within the bounds of Christian liberty, and to be good examples to others 30 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF of all godliness, soberness, and righteousness, and of eveiy duty we owe to God and man." I need scarcely describe the scene of the first sign- ing of the National Covenant. It is imprinted on the memory of every reader of history. It seems to have stamped itself, as if with a photographic stroke, on the minds of all who were contemporary with the event. All were awed, startled, subdued, as if they had been the witnesses of the rushing mighty wind, and the cloven tongues as of fire, of a new Pentecost. How the dullest old chronicler kindles into a reverential glow, as he relates how the commissioners, who had charge of the momentous task, assembled on the early dawn of that February morning. How the myriads, from Tweed to Tay, from I\Ierse to Galloway, flocked to the Greyfriars, filling church and churchyard. How one great historic face after another appeared on the scene. With what heavenly ardour Henderson prayed to the High and and Lofty One, with Whom a whole nation essayed to enter into covenant, — the vessels of clay with the al- mighty Potter, With what sweetness, force, and per- suasion Loudon spoke to the vast assemblage — he who was famed as the most eloquent man of his time, — enforcing upon them, " that they should carefully keep themselves together in a cause that was common, and in which all and every one was so deeply interested." How earnestly and devoutly the people listened, as Warriston read the Covenant, which owed to his experienced pen much of its comprehensiveness, boldness, and precision. How, after the reading of the document, there was a THE SCOTTISH COVEXANTERS. 31 solemn pause, as if men were bowed down by a feeling of the immediate presence of Divinity. How this dread expressive stillness was broken, when the Earl of Suther- land advancing, deeply affected, affixed the first signature to the National Covenant. Then, how a tempest of long pent-up enthusiasm ran through the assembled multi- tudes. Name followed name, as with electric speed, — eye gleamed to eye, hand grasped hand. The fulness of the heart, long with difficulty repressed, now burst free from all restraint. Some wept aloud ; some raised a shout of exultation, as from the field of battle and vic- tory ; some, after their signatures, added the words, " till death ;" some opened their veins, and subscribed their names with their own blood ! It was one of those moments of rapt and transcend- ental emotion, which will sometimes seize nations as well as individuals : when there is flashed into them intui- \ tions and resolutions which many rolling generations might ftul to teach ; when they are marvellously embold- ened to do, at a heat, the work of long centuries ; and | seem bonie aloft, as by an irresistible impidse, on the ( strength and swiftness of invisible wings. A General Assembly — the first free Assembly for forty years — was held at Glasgow in the winter of the same year (1G38) in which Prelacy was abolished, and Pres- byterianism restored in pristine and perfect integrity. This, in the fond language of the Presbyterian annalists, is commemorated as the " Second Reformation." At this Assembly, the Earl (afterwards Marquis) of Argyle declared his adhesion to the cause of the Covenant. " No 32 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF one thing," writes Baillie, " did C(nifirm us so much as Argyle's presence. . . . The man was the far most power- ful subject in our kingdom." Like most men of extreme caution, when Argyle resolved, he was most resolute. " It was not," he protested to the Assembly, " it was not want of affection to the good of religion and my own country which detained me ; but a desire and hope that, by stajdng with the Court, I might have been able to bring about a redress of grievances. And when I saw that I could not stay longer, without proving unfaithful to God and my country, I felt that it behoved me to join myself openly to your society." The Covenanters were now in fact the Nation. Within two months, the whole population, it may be stated roundly, had taken and signed the Covenant ; and 30,000 armed men were soon marshalled in array, to support, defend, and execute the mandates of the Cove- nanting leaders. This army of volunteers was placed under the command of Alexander Leslie (afterwards Earl of Leven), who, from an obscure Scottish adventurer, had risen, by skill, gallantry, and success in arms, to the foremost rank in the service of Holland and of Sweden, and became the favourite field-marshal of Gustavus Adol- })hus. The " old, little, crooked soldier" of Baillie — with firm massive face, towering peaked head, short crisp hair, and lancing grey eye, — he was all vigour, decision, wisdom, suavity, simple dignity. He drew around him, like a magnet, all his veteran officers ; col- lected abundance of vrarlike stores from all parts of the THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 33 Continent ; chilled into excellent soldiers the yeomanry and ploughmen through all the Lowland counties ; and by his tact, and tine perception of character, his affability, his homely comrade-like style of living, and his peerless ability, commanded the reverence and obedience alike of nobles and peasants (to use Baillie's graphic phrase) " as if he had been Great Solyman." At the same time, there was, if not an open and formal, yet a perfect understood accord between the Covenanters of Scotland and the Puritans in England, the latter of whom were now beginning to bear sway in the English Parliament, and were in like manner bestirring themselves to throw oft' much the same load of oppression as that which partly ground down, partly threatened, the people of Scotland. Although the public documents which were emitted by the king launched forth the most imperious edicts and threats against the so-called rebels, the Private Cor- respondence of the time discloses that all this was utter sham. There is nothing but dejection, nothing but croakings of expected defeat, on the part of the English politicians ; — the most boundless confidence and alacrity on the part of Covenanted Scotland. In the Strafford correspondence, Sir Edward Stanhope writes thus plainly, to the overweening and reckless Lord-Deputy of Ireland, a letter which, in a few pithy sentences, lays open to us the very core of history : — " You do not think the lion (meaning Scotland) is so terrible as he is painted. Point blank against this I am not, and yet think he is terrible enough to fear us. . . . Out of doubt they (the Scots) may draw out above three-score thousand strong, able, c 34 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF well-armed men, such as hardly will be terrified with any danger, and such as are inured to all the ills that war commonly puts soldiers to. Though in the first we may equal them, as long as health and strength lasts, yet doubtless in the other we fall far short. It is most certain, of such men excellently well armed, they have in one shire thirty thousand. AVe are questionless far inferior to them in number of great and expert com- manders within this kingdom. And I fear, if it should come to that (which God avert), they would be too far within our bowels to be easily cast out again by those sent for from foreign parts. . . . Who can tell how many hearts they have (God pardon and turn the hearts of such) in this kingdom ? who, though they may be drawn to the field, may fight so faintly as they had better run away ; nay perhaps, if ever fortune smUe on them in any one conflict, false cowards may prove fatal and bloody butchers to their own side. . . . And truly (which God forbid !) if a time of such calamity should come upon us, it would, like a thief in the night, take us unprovided and dismayed — like a sudden plague, or deluge, which would infect and overflow much ground before it could be stayed, and the waters turn home into their own natural channels." What a contrast to this letter is the boldness and decision manifested in Scotland ! Thus in a letter from Edinburgh, by Borthwick, an agent much employed by the Covenanters to carry intelligence to and from Eng- land : " All degrees go on without any fainting, and not a man is known to fall from their number, but daily THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS, 35 coming in. There was never at any time such plenty of preaching and prayer as now in Edinburgh. All the most able ministers are set a-work, preaching every day in many places, and on the Lord's day three sermons in each chiu'ch ordinarily, and so in all the halls and great houses. God is not wanting with his blessing, for the obstinate are powerfully brought in by the ministers of the Word, . . . We hear much of English armies and ships to come, but we neither see nor fear anything that way."^ Thus also in a letter from Alexander Erskine (I suppose of the Mar family) to his brother : "I hope that the same God that strengthened the arm of the land of Sweden against Germany, will strengthen us against England ; at least that part of it that will con- test, without offence given them, for a number of scurvy priests. They may consider that war may well begin here, but, like a pestilence, it will spread over all this isle. . . . Both the king and England are rending that they will never knit again,"^ Stung into resistance by national wrongs and insults, and the dark shadows of farther tyranny to come ; united into one brotherhood ; having command of the whole resources of the country, money, men, and arms ; in spired by their rallying cry, " Christ's Crown and Cove- nant ;" and now able to count upon the popular party in England, — the Covenanters, when hostilities opened, achieved an easy victory over Charles, haughty and bigoted, but rash, blind, and unfortunate. " The Cove- nanters," writes the Earl Marshal, from York, to Secre- 1 State Paper Office. - Thid. 36 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF tary Windebank, just before the meeting of the two armies, " The Covenanters sweep all before them in Scotland with a most high strain of disobedience. . . . We are here (in private be it spoken) without Sir William Uvdale, or so much as one penny of money till he come. How much when, God knows. "^ In both the two cam- paigns of 1639 and 1640, the Covenanters vanquished the king almost without striking a blow, for his power was but a phantom the moment it was approached. They wrung from him, however unwilling, the concession of all their demands, which may be compressed into this one short phrase — Free Parliaments and Free As- semblies. 1 State Paper Office. THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 37 11. SOLEMN LEAGUE AND COVENANT WITH ENGLAND. The Covenauters had now, in effect, gained the objects for which they took up arms, and had the government of Scotland entirely in their own hands. But the king was engaged in the self-same contest with the English people. So long, therefore, as the English contest continued unsettled and doubtful, the Covenanters had no security for the maintenance of their rights. They knew the habitual, the fatal dissimulation of the king ; and that if he could divide and conquer, if he could despatch the liberties of England by its being left alone and unassisted in the contest, he would soon make short work of the extorted concessions in favour of Scotland. I cannot pursue the involvements of the English Civil War. It is a history by itself. Suffice it to say, that in 1642 both the king and the Parliamentarians were avow- edly mustering for mortal combat, and both were equally anxious about the part which the Scottish Covenanters should take. If they took part at all, the side which they espoused was almost cyrtaiu of a sweeping victory. 38 THE FIFTY YEAES' STRUGGLE OF If they even abstained, this sort of negative influence would be most portentous ; for, divided as England was, and dubiously balanced as were the parties there, no one could foretell to which side the fortune of war would favourably incline. In all aspects of the matter, the responsibility resting upon the Covenanters was tremen- ' dous. Owing to a sing-ular combination of events, they ; held in their hands the destinies of Britain and the cause ' of liberty for an indefinite future. The world was in one ' of its biggest throes. On the cast of the die depended whether Absolutism or Constitutionalism should rule these Islands ; whether there should be any counterpoise to the prevailing despotisms of Europe ; or whether it was to be consigned to the unrelieved darkness of universal repression and bondage. Such was the issue. How did the sons of the Covenant reply 1 Take their reply in the trumpet-tones of the Kirk, which, in those days at least, never uttered an uncertain sound, which never flinched from peril, whose spirit always rose as the waters swelled, and which, with all its peculiar tenets, and all its peculiar phraseology, was ever on the vanguard in the battle for Britain's liberty. Listen to the strong doughty words of the General Assembly : — " The controversies now in England being betwixt the Lord Jesus and Antichrist with his followers, if we would not come under the curse of Meroz, we should come out upon so clear a call from the representative body of England to the representative body of Scotland, and help the Lord against the mighty, being assured that the help we give to His Kirk, in such an exigent. THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 39 is given to Himself, and shall not want a blessed reward." " If we forsake England, we forsake our dearest friends, who can best help us in case we be reduced to the like straits hereafter by the common adversary ; for the dis- tance and distressed estates of other Protestant Kirks make them unable to help us in this kind ; and if we denude ourselv^es of the support of England, by suffering them to sink, we do not only betray their safety, but our own." These sentiments, the key-note of a whole people's ,' response, naturally prepared the way for that great public ; act, which truly decided the fate of the Civil War, saved the liberties of Britain at the time, has in a thousand ways influenced her destiny ever since, and first drew England and Scotland into the sympathy of common \ principles and of common interests — I mean " The I Solemn League and Covenant.'^ This bond of alliance between the constituent popular bodies of England and Scotland was entered into in 1643, and was mutually subscribed by the Covenanting and Parlia- mentary leaders, and also extensively by the people of both countries. The following is Hallam's analysis, perhaps the neat- est and most concise that can be given, of this sacred treaty between the two nations : — " The Covenant con- sisted in an oath, to be subscribed by all persons in both kingdoms, whereby they bound themselves to preserve the Reformed religion in the Church of Scotland, in doctrine, worship, discipline, and government, according to the Word of God and practice of the best reformed 40 THE FIFTY YEAES STRUGGLE OF churclies ; and to endeavour to bring the Cliurches of God, in the three kingdoms, to the nearest conjunction and uniformity in religion, confession of faith, form of church government, directory for worship and catechising ; to endeavour, without respect of persons, the extirpation of Popery, Prelacy, and whatsoever should be found con- trary to sound doctrine and the power of godliness ; to preserve the rights and privileges of the Parliaments, and the liberties of the kingdoms, and the king's person and authority in the preservation and defence of the true religion and liberties of the kingdoms ; to endeavour the discovery of incendiaries and malignants, who hinder the reformation of religion, and divide the king from his people, that they may be brought to punishment ; finally, to assist and defend all such as should enter into this covenant, and not suffer themselves to be withdrawn from it, whether to revolt to the opposite party, or to give in to a detestable indifference and neutrality." Let us pause for a moment, and reflect upon the pur- port of this Solemn League, which, together with the National Covenant, was the deliberate and final expres- sion of the opinions of the Scottish people, and to a large extent of the English people, on the civil and reli- gious problems of the da}^ There is a vague notion that those Covenants w^ere altogether the work of the austere Scottish Presbyters. But this is not the case. The Covenants, as much as anything could l3e, were the work of the whole nation — the voice of the whole people. The National Covenant THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 41 was brought forward by tlie famous Tables, as they were called — the four great standing committees organized in 1637, and formed so as to represent the nobles, the gentry, the clergy, and the burghers ; and it was ratified \ and made law by the king himself, when he presided in person over the Scottish Parliament of 1641. The Solemn League and Covenant, again, was framed with much care, and formally arranged between the Scottish Parliament and the English Commissioners ; and it was received and adopted by the English Parliament on the! 21st September 1643. In short, the Covenants were public legislative acts, expressing what in those days were the fixed ideas and resolutions of the people as to government, as to liberty, as to religion. They were the terms more especially on which Scotland off'ered allegiance to her sovereign. They were the constitution by which the monarch must be bound in rule, no less than the people in loyalty and obedience. Wliat, then, were these princiijles ] Looking at both Covenants, and treating them as one document, the prin- ciples therein embodied were the following : — 1. Defence of the Reformed Presbyterian religion in Scotland. 2. Promotion of uniformity amongst the churches in the three kingdoms. 3. Extirpation of Popery, Prelacy, and all unsound forms of religion. 4. Preservation of the Parliaments, and of the liberties of the people. 5. Defence of the sovereign in his maintaining the 42 THE FIFTY YEAES' STRUGGLE OF Reformed religion, the Parliaments, and the liberties of the people. 6. Discovery and punishment of malignants, and dis- turbers of the peace and welfare of the nations. 7. Mutual defence and protection of each individually, and of all jointly, who were within the bonds of the Covenant. 8. Sincere and earnest endeavour to set an example before the world of public, personal, and domestic vu'tue and godliness. You will observe, that the principles in these Cove- nants are partly civil or political, partly religious, and partly mixed, or composed of both elements. You will also remember that the Covenants had a twofold deriva- tion : first, they were truly the impulse of the nation, voluntary popular compacts; but, secondly, they were afterwards sanctioned and authorized by the parliaments of both kingdoms. In other words, they were in their origin voluntary bonds of engagement, but were after- wards clothed with authority as legislative acts. As voluntary engagements amongst the people them- selves, I can see no objection to them. I think they are worthy of the highest praise and admiration — with one exception, on which I shall have presently to com- ment. The people of Scotland and England, environed with perils as they were at the time, had an undoubted right, as free men and Christian men, to associate volun- tarily for establishing and securing their national privi- leges and institutions as described in the Covenants. It is but a truism now-a-days to declare that these THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 43 were perfectly legitimate objects of voluntary popular association, and are so still ; nay, and I predict, if similar times should recur — if similar perils should again threaten these lands — there are hundreds of thousands, both in England and Scotland, who would also again voluntarily associate, not under the same, but under another Solemn League and Covenant, suited to the ideas, and dangers, and duties of the day. Further, it will scarcely now be disputed, that the civil authorities who then actually governed the two nations had a right to intervene with their sanction in the civil objects of the Covenants, such as the preserva- tion of the Parliaments, and of law and liberty, and the requirement that the sovereign should rule in strict ob- servance of these limitations. But was it within their province to interfere with and to add the civil sanction to certain religious principles, such as the defence of Presb}i;crianism in Scotland, the promotion of religious uniformity in the three kingdoms, and the extirpation (in whatever sense that may be taken) of Popery, Pre- lacy, and other unsound forms of religion ? There are a number of modern jurists and theologians who contend that the state can only take cognisance of civil affairs ; and that even in these its sphere is a narrow one ; it must let men alone in most of their civil relations and pursuits ; but, above ail, it can take no cognisance of religion ; that is forbidden ground, where it must on no account enter. Men as to their religion must be equally protected, but none favoured and none hindered. For my own hundjlc part, in the 44 THE FIFTY YEAKS' STRUGGLE OF abstract, I coincide in this view. I cannot interrupt the present discourse witJi a set dissertation upon this questio vexata, daily becoming more urgent for a sohition, and on the true sokitiou of which may soon come to depend, amongst other contingencies, whether free reli- gious societies can really be carried out, — whether large bodies of Christians can realize what they believe to be their Master's model of the Church, His kingdom not of this world, — whether it will be possible to render unto God the things that are God's, without being con- fronted and brought to a stand-still by an arrestment from the hands of Csesar. Opinion is as yet unformed and groping about ; and there is fluctuation and differ- ence amongst the best and wisest. All that I ask is what every one is entitled to, — without argument at present, and without modifying explanations, and in all modesty and candour, I hope, to enunciate what is the broad impression in my own mind. The State, then, in my view, is not a great blind force lying outside of man, like the succession of day and night, or the revolution of summer and winter, which he cannot in any way aflfect or control, but to which he must submit, — to which he must quietly accommodate himself, and do the best he can under the inevitable necessity. The State is his own creature, his own production, over which he has as much control as he has what kind of corn or plants he shall grow upon his lands. The people may assert with truth, what Louis of France did with so much arrogance — "■ The State is ourselves." The State is made for man, not man for the State. It provides THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 45 for many of liis wants and purposes ; but, it. is not so wide and high as himself; it is not co-extensive with the total of humanity. The people do not place them- selves, soul and body, under its harness, to be turned and driven like dumb cattle. It is only, as it were, a committee appointed by themselves, to conduct certain of their aflFairs, to regulate certain of their actions ; but there is a wide sphere reserved — if not by any express statute, yet by the very essence and dignity of human nature — from the operation of State authority. With- out venturing to define all that is comprised within this reserved sphere, I have no hesitation in affirming, that religious faith, and worship, and discipline are sacredly reserved. In all that appertains to his religion, man stands out free and unshackled, under the blue dome of heaven, alone with his God. The civil magistrate, if he interfere within that region, steps beyond the boundary of his committee powers, and by the free soul of mankind ought to be commanded back into the sole province where he can act or forbid, reward or punish. Hence I cannot even delegate to him any jurisdiction circa sacra. Admit him ci?xa sacra, he will soon force him- self in sacris. AU power, when once admitted, tends to usurp, to absorb, to dominate. Once let the raging flood round about your walls, it will soon sap the foimda- tions, and pour destruction into your innermost chambers. Check it at a distance ; dam it as far away as possible even from your outer walls. But then it must be borne in mind, that confused and entangled times will often arise, when that which is 46 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF civil and that wliicli is religious are so mixed, that no human ingenuity, nothing short of omniscience, can analyse and unravel them ; and the State, unless it is ignominiously to forego its whole function of governing, will be necessitated to act, to prescribe, to regulate ; to repress here, to foster and encourage there — even to exercise force, though some may thereby complain that their religion has been interfered with. Such is the seething and boiling in Italy at present, where the so- called spiritual prerogatives of the Pope are mixed up with his claims of temporal sovereignty. Such the in- tense and deep-seated ferment in Hungary (now beginning so closely to resemble the first motions of the Covenant- ing struggle), where the maintenance of ecclesiastical rights is but the symbol of a great national life, which is concentrating until it feel strong enough to shatter that iceberg, within which it would long ago have been frozen to death, but for the immortal fire that animates i the hearts of the people. Such also, to revert to our o\vn subject, w^as the confusion and distraction in this Britain of ours at the time of the Covenanters. Prelacy in eflfect w^as tantamount to royal absolutism, Presby- terianism to constitutional government ; and, conse- quently, the defence of Presbyterianism in Scotland, and its extension, if possible, to the two other kingdoms, were measures all but indispensable, seeing how religious sects were then marshalled, in order to the secure esta- blishment of a constitutional system of government throughout the whole of Britain. The opinion which confines the operations of the State within such narrow THE SCOTTTSH COVENANTERS. 47 limits as have been adverted to, is comparatively modern — at least as an active popular opinion. It had never previously been doubted, that the civil magistrate had a charge in regard to the religion of the people (cjrca sacra), quite as much as in regard to their civil relations ; a charge, for instance, not to minister or dispense the sacraments, but a charge to establish the Church within liis dominions ; to protect it, and to guard it from the assaults of error and dissension. Hence it was that all the states throughout Europe were ranged into classes, — Protestant or Popish, Calvinistic or Lutheran, Pres- byterian or Episcopalian ; and had each their national Church civilly endowed and guaranteed, being part and parcel of the State, and had each a certain received civil policy corresponding with these religious distinctions, — a policy which guided them in all their most critical affairs, in war and peace, in their alliances and hostilities, and in the internal government of their several peoples. Such was the understanding of all Europe. It was accepted as an axiom in the government of nations, self-evident, and beyond all dispute. And it is still an axiom in Europe, almost everywhere except in our own country ; and even in our own country it is still held sacred, I apprehend, by a large numerical majority. Surely, then, the Covenanters must have the benefit of this the universal idea of their own times, — the still cherished idea of (as I believe) the majority in the present times. Viewed in the light of this idea, there was nothing wrong or incongruous, there was every- thing just and excellent, in the State lending its sane- 48 THE FIFTY YEAES' STRUGGLE OF tion and authority to the religious principles of the Covenants. There is one principle, however, which must be ex- cei)ted from the general tribute of praise which we have awarded to the Covenants, — one principle which no allowance for times and circumstances should induce us to slur over and palliate. That is where the Solemn League and Covenant binds the takers of it, — " That we shall, . . . without respect to persons, endeavour the extirpation of Popery, Prelacy, . . . superstition, heresy, schism, profaneness, and whatsoever shall be found to be contrary to sound doctrine and the power of godliness." If by " extirpation" it could be supposed that nothing more was intended than that figurative extirpation which may be produced by argument and moral influence (and that gloss has been sometimes attemj^ted upon the pas- sage), there could be no objection, except that a harsh and revolting word had been used. But the context of the Covenants, the measures that were occasionally sanc- tioned by the leaders, as well as the universal intolerance of the period, will not permit this mild construction. It cannot be doubted that the extirpation might be by civil pains, and penalties, and coercions. Si)eaking in the nineteenth century, and in Britain, I need not formally disclaim any approval of such a sentiment. I know of no other weapons a Christian can wield, in combating what he believes to be even deadly error, but persuasion and prayer ; provided always (but this proviso must be well marked) that the error be simply religious, and have no civil characteristics, by which the propagators of it THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 49 bring lliemselves, by their own default, within the juris- diction of the magistrate. Intolerance was the universal vice of the age, and was inevitable in the transition through which mankind were then passing. It was but half a century from the awful struggles of the Reformation ; and there had been war — war — war and bloodshed ever since — through the whole length and breadth of Europe. Romanists and Protes- tants stood on the opposite banks of a small stream, ready to rush across ; and Romanism had latterly been closing in, and gaining the advantage on all sides. Protestant- ism was fresh and young and confident, little used to those doubts, those different \iews of things, with which the modem mind is familiar, and which have taught us at last, it is to be hoped, some lessons of mutual forbear- ance and charity. Young Protestantism, therefore, at first partook largely of the intolerance of old Roman- ism ; although, as can easily be proved from the writings of those very Covenanters, there were visions of loftier things beginning to dawn and glimmer on the inner | sense of Protestant Christians. The Westminster Con- fession, compiled when the Covenanters were at the height of their influence, both in England and Scotland, contains this golden proposition : " God alone is Lord of the conscience, and hath left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men. . . . And the requiring of an implicit faith, and an absolute and blind obedience, is to destroy liberty of conscience, and reason also." Henderson, in a Sermon preached before the House of Lords hi Westminster Abbey, in 1 045, enforces with his D 50 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF usual judgment, clearness, and gravity, the entire sjjiri- tuality of Chi:ist's kingdom. Christ " came from heaven for things Divine, to work upon the consciences of men, and was appointed to be Judge of quick and dead ; but never meddled with the office of a temporal king." " The kingdoms of the world have carnal weapons and strength of arms to pursue their ends ; but the weapons of the kingdom of Christ are spiritual, to procure spiritual obedience unto him." " Domination is forbidden church- men ; ministration is commanded." \ If the Covenanters are to be blamed for intolerance — remember — their fault was the blindness of their times, in which their oppon- ents, and other sects and parties, were as much, if not • more involved than themselves.) And Presbyterianism was at least self-curing ; it carried in its bosom the anti- dote as well as the bane. Unlike the dark, close, un- ventilated Hierarchies, Presbyterianism, by its institutions / and opinions, threw itself open to lay influences, to the i voice of the eldership, to the election of the people, to ; the full breeze of public opinion ; and public opinion, as it became more enlightened, was sure, in the end, to blow away and dissipate the fumes of intolerance. And at this very juncture, when the Covenanters arose, there were the most ominous, the most gloomy foresha- dowings of danger to Protestantism, and to human liberty, over Europe generally, but particularly in Britain. I shall quote from two Avriters, whose genius, whose calm- ness, whose large comprehension, whose research in ori- ginal documents, invest their statements with the high- est authoritv. I refer to Ranke and Guizot. As regards THE SCOTTISH COVKNANTERS. ol the general daiie(jple. It is plain that neither of them was deceived in the other. Charles felt that under the name of king he was but a prisoner, and was used as the tool of the • dominant party, who gave no credit to his professions. The Covenanters saw that his nature was base and faith - le.ss ; that no tie could bind him ; that declarations and oaths were to him but as empty air. Tliey took their 68 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF measures accordingly. They banished his Malignant associates, reduced him to a nonentity, ruled everything without him, and, what to him was the most intolerable of all, subjected him to a discipline of endless fasts, and prayers, and sermons. Argyle, the real sovereign of the country, whoever might be nominal king, seems to have tended and kept about him with a kind of ostentatious service, half-prying and half-patronizing, which struck the bitterest enmity into the young king's heart. Ever careful in those times of change and jeopardy to fence himself round with ratifications, and indemnities, and secret pactions, Argyle, in whose hands Charles was only a puppet, drew from huu a letter, wi'itten by himself, and signed with his seal-manual, expressive of his favour towards Argyle, and trust and confidence in him ; and, particularly, promising to make him a duke^ a knight of the garter, and lord of the bed-chamber, whenever he should think lit to call for performance of the promise ; to be guided by his counsels ; and, when restored to his just rights in England, to see him paid the sum of <£40,000 sterling (an enormous amount in those days, probably equal to £150,000 now), which was estimated '. as the debt due to Argyle for his public disbursements and expenses. Rising in ambition, and yielding to the weird-like vision that the race of Maccallum-More might yet mount the throne, he proposed that Charles should marry his daughter, to which the needy and reckless youth consented, probably, however, only to amuse him, and attach him by the bands of golden hope to the Royalist cause. This singular piece of secret history is THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 69 most circumstantially related by old Kirkton, a contem- porary, having the best means of information, honest and unsophisticated, himself a Covenanter, and candid and respectful to the memory of the great Marquis. " The Marquis of Argyle, being all that time almost dic- tator of Scotland, to make all sure for himself, being in great danger from the en\7- of his enemies, thought good to strike up a match betwixt the king and his daughter, Lady Anne, to which the king consented with «,ll asstir- ance ; though all that poor family had by the bargain was a disappointment, so grievous to the poor young lady, that, of a gallant young gentlewoman, she lost her spirit and turned absolutely distracted. So unfortunately do the back wheels of private designs work in the puppet plays of the public revolutions in the world." This real dictation, exercised under the guise of loyal counsel, varied by some sharp reproofs for the vices in which Charles indulged, and aggravated by what would appear the traitorous presumption of taking advantage of the king's necessities to urge the marriage with his daughter ; all these, and many other circumstances, excited in the king feelings of personal revulsion and abhorrence, which in course of time hurried Argyle to his doom. Charles, who was all his life very easy as to public indignities done to the nation, was never known to forgive any man who had insulted or personally offended himself ; only he waited on quietly till the time for revenge came round. He winked like an owl, but at last seized on his prey like a raven. This unreal and unnatural state of things, the bow 70 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF being too far bent, snapt and gave way after Cromwell's defeat of the Covenanting army at the battle of Dunbar. This battle was to the Covenanters something like the battle of Preston to the Engagers. It shattered their forces, crippled their intiuence, and dimmed the prestige which liad hitherto surrounded them. On their wreck, military and political, a kind of King's Guard was formed, composed of Royalists and Engagers, who now broke through all the meshes of restraint, soon com- manded a majority in the Committee of Estates, and at one blow demolished that Act of Classes, out of which their own proscription as a party, and the exclusive do- minion of the Covenanters, had equally arisen. They proceeded to levy a new army, commanded, officered, and very much filled by Malignants (or anti-Covenanters), who would fight no longer for the liberties of the people, but only for the restoration of the king to sovereign and absolute power. Last fatal sign, that the ancient spirit and the free- dom of Scotland were about to disappear under a total eclipse ! the Kirk, the hitherto impregnable, imyielding Kirk, stooped down from her old height, and emitted resolutions in favour of those proceedings of the Eoyalists. Against these Resolutions, a large, bold, fierce mino- rity, headed by James Guthrie of Stirling, Protested ; l)rotested that the principles of the Covenant should be maintained ; protested that Malignants should not be admitted to places of trust and authority, so as to enable them to sap and betray the liberties of the country ; protested that the king should only be received, and THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 71 allegiance only accorded to him, on the old constitutional terms of free Parliaments and free Assemblies. Such was the rise of the Eesoluiionei^s and the Protesters, one of the most bitter and implacable feuds that ever raged in any country ; and by which the Church of Scotland, once so united and powerful, and indeed the whole people, were hopelessly divided ; and were so unnerved, shaken to pieces, and deprived of all strength, as to be- come an easy prey to the mighty at the time of the Restoration. If the Protesters had not the satisftiction to carry out their own views, they had at least the consolation of paralysing the military movements of the Royalist-Reso- lutioner party. Of the nobles, indeed, Argyle alone sided with the Protesters, at least kept aloof from the Resolutioners ; but the absence of Argyle, lord of such a vast principality, so long the real governor of Scotland, created an ominous blank in the Royalist host. What the Protesters wanted in nobles, they made up in the general support of the smaller gentry, of the citizens, and the common people. This arrested the recruiting for the Royal army, which, besides, was not very bril- liantly ofl&cered, and had the poorest of commanders-in- chief in the person of the king himself Wliat was an army, so mustered and so commanded, but stubble before the sword of Cromwell 1 And such it proved, at the battle of Worcester, in IGol, where, for the time being, the final extingidsher was put upon Royalism in Britain. The protesting Covenanters had thus the merit, as they might themselves deem it — the misfortune, as it turned 72 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF out to their sad experience in the after days of reaction — to aid greatly in exchiding Charles from the throne, and the Royalists from power, wealth, and office, for the full space of ten years longer. These ten years — these dismal ten years — imparted edge and keenness to the persecutions that followed the Restoration of 1661 ! Their principal leaders hitherto had been the old Earl of Leven, Alexander Henderson, and the Marquis of Argyle. Leven restricted himself very much to his duties as a military commander. Henderson had by this time passed away from the scene, as on the wings of that whirlwind which he had done so much to raise and to moderate, to sustain and direct. Argjde re- mained, the very personification of this period of struggle anterior to the Restoration ; and we shall in due time meet him paying the penalty which all reformers must pay, whenever the floodgates of reaction break loose. Archibald, Marquis of Argyle, was the representative of one of the oldest and greatest families in Scotland. It seems to have been a family that generally sided with new aspiring parties, with new imminent revolutions, and rose upon every change. It took part with Bruce, and shared in his prosperous fortunes. It cast in its lot with the Reformation ; and when that cause became all- triumphant, the family of Argyle made a further stride in eminence and power. And now when the great struggle for constitutional liberty broke out, again there was an Argyle — true to the instincts of the family — THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 73 thoughtfully and cautiously embarking upon the revo- lutionary or popular side ; and at every swell of the wave mounting higher and higher in rank, in posses- sions, in distinction, in personal and political importance. He was born in 1598. He was educated with care, and to a degree beyond what the rough barons of those times generally aspired after. Besides the usual routine of the classics, the native bent of his mind led him to the pro- found and methodical study of theology and jurisprudence. His training thus prepared him to be the foremost states- man in an age of politico-religious revolution ; and the short pithy maxims of the scholastic theologians and jurists are thickly inlaid in all his speeches and writings. On returning from his travels, he repaired to the Court of Charles i., where he was held in gi-eat favour and consideration by the King. In 1626, he was made a privy-councillor, and was much employed in the King's service. His father, also Archibald by name, seems to have been a man of wayward, perverse, and unhappy disposition. He had been a favourite with James ; but being immersed in debt, had to quit the country in 1616, and, as Scotstarvet informs us, "went over to West Flanders to serve the King of Spain, and became Papist." The education of the son seems to have been conducted under the eye of the Earl of Morton, whose daughter he afterwards married. The father returning to London after the accession of Charles, was well re- ceived at Court ; for Charles was always kind to old courtier friends, and his conversion to Popery would ingratiate liim with tlie Queen, and her little mischief- 74 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF making caiiiarilla. He had conceived a morbid hatred against his oldest son, then Lord Lorn, and vowed to disinherit him altogether. He furthermore endeavoured to ruin him in the esteem and confidence of the King. But the King disregarded all this as the frenzy of blinded passion ; and having the power of forfeiture against the old Earl by means of the penal laws against Popery, under which he had fallen, Charles very gener- ously protected Lorn from the vindictive fury of his fether, and compelled the latter to assign over to his son all the estates and honours of Argyle, reserving to him- self only a liferent maintenance suitable to his rank. At their last meeting in the royal presence, the old Earl declared, " I submit to the king's pleasure, though I believe I am hardly dealt with ; " then turning to his son, " I have to call to your remembrance how undutiful your carriage has been towards me ; but bear ever in mind how bountiful the king has been to you, which yet I am sure you will forget." Summoning up the whole bitterness of a father when maddened with hatred against his own oftspring, he thus finally addressed the king : " Sire, I know this young man better than you can do. You have brought me low, that you may raise him. I doubt you will live to repent. He is a man of craft, subtlety, and falsehood, and can love no man ; and if ever he finds it in his power to do you mischief, he will be sure to do it." It was amid this hissing fire of curses that Argyle entered into his inheritance ; and certainly, however ominous the entrance, a magnificent inheritance it was, or eventually became under his nursing manage- THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 75 raent ' Since tlie Dukes of Guise in France, or the Princes of Orange in Holland, or the Black Douglases of Scotland, scarcely had any sovereign or people beheld such a prince- vassal towering up in their midst. From Glenmore in the far north, where in our more peaceful times the Caledonian Canal flows in beneficent current, to the Mull of Kintyre and tlie estuaiy of Clyde in the south, through the mountains of L<3cliaber and the forests of Badenoch, amid a country which nature had made all liut impregnable, and over tens of thousands of hardy and devoted clansmen, who knew the Maccallum-More, but not Charles Stuart — he reigned the undisputed chief. His family had been the High Justiciars of all Scotland, executing the regal authority both in civil and criminal causes ; but since the institution of the Court of Session, this, once the most exalted ofiice under the crown, had been reduced to almost nominal dignity. Argyle ex- changed the now empty bauble for real Justiciary juris- diction, that is for real sovereignty over the Western Highlands, and over the Western Isles from the Hebrides to Arran, having in his hands the liberties, the proper- ties, the lives of the whole population. A dominion so gigantic was felt in the remotest Highland glen, even though not directly under his sway ; and virtually he was King of the North of Scotland, especially when the central government was daily becoming weaker, until it ceased at last to have any influence or control. Nor was his dominion confined to the Highlands. He had pos- sessions in the counties of Renfrew and Ayr and along by the Ochils, where Castle Campbell, from its eyrie of rocks, 70 THE FIFTY YEARS STRUGGLE OF still looks with a falcon's eye over the vale of the Devon and the plains of the Forth. Besides the castles and towers that studded his extensive domains, he had in Edinburgh, in Glasgow, in Stirling, and other chief cities, large and stately mansions, filled with his retainers, where all important personages, whether countrymen or foreigners, congregated around the great man, and which marked his pre-eminence, and impressed the people with feelings of awe and submission. " Questionless," says Baillie, " the greatest subject the King had ! " This unique social position was sure to make him the prime leader of whatever party he might embrace. But, inde- pendently of position, he was endued ^^dth qualities fitted to raise him to the highest pinnacle of the state, espe- cially in confused, crooked, and intricate times. Very unlike a lord and chieftain of the Gael indeed, he was timorous to a degree often verging upon cowardice ; and though, as the head of a warlike clan, and of thousands of tributary vassals, he was frequently under the neces- sity of taking the field and conducting military expedi- tions, his name is not coupled with a single feat of prowess, or one brilliant exploit of arms. Debarred by physical temperament from gaining renown on the field of battle — his legitimate sphere as a Highland prince — he all the more sedulously cultivated the arts of political leadership and diplomacy. His governing characteristic was wisdom, in its highest sense ; that true regulator of the whole intellectual and activ^e powers, as nuich the free gift of nature as genius is, and perhaps even more rare. It is an attribute quite distinct from knowledge, THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 7 i learning, talent, skill ; or rather, it is the harmonious composition and union of them all, used in their due order, and directed so as most effectually to conduce to the desired result. Separately or unduly exerted, these special faculties are apt to fail of the mark : it is only by their nice adjustment that they are made to work etficiently ; and this nice adjustment constitutes wisdom; — as it is not strength alone that makes the expert \\Testler, nor agility alone, nor tlie knowledge of trips and throws alone, but the combination of them all, and their right use at the right moment. All the contem- poraries of Arg}'le, whether hostile or friendly, whether his own countrjmien or the English politicians, were, I had almost said, overawed by his extraordinary wisdom. His friends had a mysterious faith in it, his enemies a mysterious fear of it. In depicting the perils and per- plexities in 1646, when negotiations were going on be- tween the Scottish and English Parliaments as to terms of accommodation with the King, Baillie thus writes : "Argyle's authority and wise carriage here has much stopped the mouth of our enemies." He elsewhere affirms of him, that in all exigencies he " did give most and best advice in every purpose which came by hand." And writing at the time of his execution, although he had been estranged from him by party controversies for more than ten years, Baillie exclaims with an aflfecting and subdued pathos, " Tlie man was very wise ! " Wisdom always presented itself as the marked and dominating fea- ture of his character. His constant rule in government — the word constantly on his lips — was " moderation :" 78 THE FIFTY YEAKs' STRUGGLE OF not the moderatiou of feebleness, but of a considerate and compreliensive mind. The whole policy of Scotland, both in Cliurch and State, from 1638 to 1650 — daring yet cautious, revolutionary in plan, yet moderate and orderly in execution — is the biography of Argyle. Like all the liigher class of statesmen who have ruled pre-eminent at critical eras — such as our own Burleigh, and Regent MuiTay, and Somers, and Pitt, and Peel — he has but little personal history ; his name represents the policy of his country. This large endowment of wisdom for which he was so remarkable, was fitly mated with an industry constant and untiring. Nothing was too hard or heavy for his powers of labour : nothing so minute or nicely disguised as to escape his ever-watchful eye. His own policy was locked up in a breast that revealed nothing ; time alone was his slow interpreter ; but the designs of his adversaries he knew by intuition, or tracked by his extensive means of secret information, and he was always prepared to ward off a blow, long before the arm was raised that was to strike it. He was master of others, because he had first learned to be master of himself : his wisdom and industry were seconded by his unruffled self-possession and coolness. Burnet, who was his con- temporary, and moved in the same circles, descril)es hun as being " of an invincible calmness of temper." There are traces, however, that his temper was naturally some- wliat harsh and austere. Baillie sometimes records his " flytings" in Parliament ; and Sir James Balfour gives specimens of his invective as idiomatic and unceremoni- ous, as if they had proceeded from a Swift or a Cobbett. THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. / \) The " invincible calmness," therefore, which he gener- ally displayed, and which was his character with the pnblic, must have been a victory of strict self-control and self-discipline. His morals were correct and pure ; his deportment grave and solemn ; and entirely absorbed in the public service, he was sober, reserved, and frugal in his habits of lining. He was an able and accomplished speaker. Baillie calls him " an excellent spokesman ;" Kirkton, " a judicious la^\^er and an eloquent orator." Judging from the remains of his writings and speeches, he was very methodical and comprehensive in treating his subject ; resolved every question into its first prin- ciples, or the plainest grounds of expediency ; was con- cise and sententious, often gravely ironical, and was fond of strong homely metaphors and illustrations. He was a man of decided religion, of fervent and exalted piety. From his first appearance in history down to the close of his career, he was consistent in his profession and con- duct. It is easy and it is usual for cynical men of the world to sneer at such high religious professions as hypocrisy ; but the religion which, as in the case of Argyle, has accompanied a man through a long life, amid every change and temptation, has largely stamped his actions, and set up an altar in his family, has con- i S(jled him in prison, supported him to the scatibld, and j inspired his last breath, will be accepted by every gene- 1 rous mind as true, and practical, and sincere. He evi- dently preferred the Presbyterian model ; but he nowhei-e appears as a mere Presbyterian zeahjt, and showed an extreme aversion to clerical secularity. His cliief anxiety 80 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF was for the preservation of the Reformed religion, pure and simple, and the overthrow of all hierarchies. He believed that hierarchies, if ever they get full scope, are incompatible with constitutional monarchy, or constitu- tional government of any kind. In particular, he be- lieved that Papal Rome can only subsist, like cancer, by eating into the living flesh of free men, and corrupting all its sound elements into a foul and diseased mass. Thus, in answer to a taunting letter from the Earl of Strafford, in 1638, he expresses himself in language which is verified every day, even in our own times and country : " This people (the Scots) can hardly be brought back one step to Rome, wliich on so good grounds they have cast off, and settled by their laws. And they keep still this maxim, — that whosoever love or favour Popery more than the Reformed religion, if they durst avouch it, love the Pope too, or any of his sect better than the sovereign of the country." That he had many faults, is at once admitted. This is the common admis- sion to be made concerning all men, even the best and greatest, more particularly in situations of extreme diffi- culty, and in seasons of revolutionary fury. Doubtless he had a selfishness of his own, as we all have. It is probably true, what Burnet alleges, that " he was much set on raising his own family to be a sort of king in the Highlands." He may have been cold, hard, unami- able ; he was by temperament hesitating, suspicious, un- confiding ; and seems to have been only frank and gracious upon policy, when he was gaining people over to his own ways. Then he could trim his sails to catch THE SCOTTISH COVENANTEES. 81 the breeze, and be courtly, bland, and insinuating, and (as Baillie naively phrases it) " he drew all men after him," It is no presumption in favour of any kindliness in his nature, that he was under the malison of his father ; that he was at mortal enmity with his father-in-law the Earl of Morton ; that, like his own father over again, he took, or pretended to take an inveterate dislike to his eldest son Lord Lorn, and threatened to disinherit him. Even on the good easy maxim in such cases, that there are faults on both sides, a large share of the faults must have been Argyle's. Craft was another vice always charged upon him. We have seen how his en- raged father denounced him as " a man of craft, subtlety, and falsehood," and who could " love no man." His enemies have perpetuated this cry ; and even friendly chroniclers will sometimes drop a hint of his " cun- ning ways." This is the fault into which political wis- dom is the most apt to degenerate. In his very outer man, as transmitted to us in portraits and traditions, there is the adumbration of two natures : the one crafty and politic ; the other wise and clear. The spare wiry figure, the long face, the compressed yet unctuous mouth, the squint eyes — sharp but unreadable, whence he is known as the " giied Marquis " until this day — these we may suppose to indicate a man dexterous, shifty, versatile, capable of the most secret designs, the most imexpected movements, a man deep and impene- trable : yet again, looking at the gi-eat upper head, the finely- knit capacious brow, and the calm fixed energy of expression, you feel in the presence of one who had a F 82 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF large grasping intellect, a concentrated subtle force of will, a capacity for gi'eat tlioiiglits and plans, a long- enduring persistence of purpose, fitting him to rule as the first statesman in an age of political and theological revolution. " He kept his authority," observes Kirkton, " after the fall of almost all his competitors, which occa- sioned him, as is usual, a great deal of envy ; and being very wise and politic, he was by many reckoned either subtile or false." Yet with all his faults, I have tried every theory upon his character, and nothing will explain him, in life and in death, except the theory that he was a TRUE PATRIOT. Nothing will explain him, if we do not believe his own solemn words, uttered at his trial, when he knew that he was within a few weeks of death. " In all the transactions of affairs in which I ever had any hand, I was never led by any private design of ad- vantage to myself, either of honour or benefit, which are the main things that sway the most part of men's actions. ... If I had aimed at honours, I wanted not opportu- nities, if I durst have forsaken other things in which I was engaged by strict obligations more binding upon me than personal ends." For more than twenty years, his whole princely power, the whole energies of his mind, his whole working life, were dedicated to the realization of two ideas, — first, the establishment of constitutional monarchy, but he would rather have the throne vacant than occupied by a despot ; second, the abolition of hierarchies, so that the nation might enjoy its religion in assurance and freedom, in peace and security. And when at any time these ideas could not be fully realized, THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 83 his next nile Wiis, never to despair of his country, never to turn away on the other side even if she had fallen amongst thieves, never to neglect the opportunities that remained, but to make the best use of every crisis, and to save the people as much as possible from injury and violence. Of all the peers of Scotland who had first led the battle, all had gone ; — some no doubt by death, but many from timidity, or weariness at the long-protracted struggle ; many of them from wounded pride and rivalry ; most from apostasy, each looking for his gain from his quarter : aU had gone save Argyle. As he had entered the revolution with long forethought and caution, so he kept his post with resolution and unfaltering faith. His- tory ought to be tender with the memory of such men. His frailties were human ; but his great example and his great death are amongst the things divine, which glorify the page of histoiy ; which rouse the pulse of man, when it becomes languid amid the corruptions and tyrannies of the earth, to beat again with hope and re- newed courage, and confidence in the ultimate triumph of every just cause. 84 THE FIFTY YEARS' STP.UGGLE OF III THE COMMONWEALTH— THE RESTORATION. The Commonwealth became supreme in England, Scotland, and Ireland. Charles, a poor contemptible fugitive, hanging on the skirts of this foreign court and that foreign court, pocketing their stingy alms, yet avoided and despised by them, — selfish, mean, spiritless, and licentious, a trifler as to everything manly and serious, and only industrious in vice and debauchery, — Charles was very speedily forgotten by the generality of people, or the reports which they heard concerning him tended only to sink him lower in their estimation. A new generation was growing up, who had listened with won- der to the history of Cromwell, his first appearance, his rise, his activity, his greatness of mind, the deeds of his " Ironsides," his many " crowning mercies," his elevation to sovereign command, his admirable fitness for it ; and how, by the terror he inspired, the name of a Briton was now as much feared throughout the world as was ever that of a Boman. The nations were becoming accustomed to his sway, rigid and arbitrary no doubt in some respects, but upon the whole wise, equitable, and THE SCOTTISH COVENANTEES. So enlightened, eminently favourable to commerce, and gentle and tender on the score of religion. The house of Stuart seemed waning away from the memory of Britain, as that of Bourbon now seems to be from the memory of France. Cromwell — if the Richard had been half equal to the Oliver ! — might have founded a dynasty on the ruins of the Stuarts, under which we might at this day have been living. In Scotland, the controversy between the Kesolutioners and Protesters continued with unabated animosity ; and personal rivalries, injuries, and offences mingled Avith and embittered the dispute. Indeed, there was virtually a schism in the Church between the two factions' — vir- tually two Churches. The sort of practical shape which the controversy now took was this : — The Kesolutioners still confided, or affected to confide in Charles, and de- sired and would have aided to bring about his restora- tion, on the best guarantee that could be got from him, or even without any express guarantee. The Protesters, though neither hostile to monarchy, nor to the family of the Stuarts, had no confidence in Charles, and believed that there was neither faith nor truth in him ; that it was not expedient at present to move in his restoration, but so far to acquiesce in, and take the benefit of the present strong, settled, and not unkindly government. In short, the Kesolutioners were ardently attached to royalty and to the Stuarts, and were really enemies to the English Commonwealth. The Protesters were no enemies to royalty in the abstract, but were inclined to trust more to the existing Commonwealth than to any 86 THE FIFTY YEAES' STRUGGLE OF kind of royalty likely to be established by Charles or his counsellors. This latter party (the Protesters) were now chiefly represented by Ai'g}de, Warriston, and James Guthrie, who thus, indirectly at least, supported and strengthened the government of Cromwell. Hence, at the Restoration, the whole fury of the Court and Royal- ist party descended upon the Protesters, and especially upon the heads of these three as the leading men. But although, during the time of the Commonwealth, this controversy was raging and storming in various ways ; yet Cromwell having, for the sake of public peace and quietness, closed the doors of the General Assembly, which used to be the great scene of the com- bat, many ministers ceased from this work of strife and contention, and devoted themselves more assiduously than they had been doing before to their strictly pasto- ral duties ; to the instruction of their flocks in the essentials of the gospel, to the care of the young, to more stated visiting and catechizing, to those labours of love which best become a Clu'istian ministry, and which are the human means for rearing up the people "in knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness." And the fruits of this awakened, earnest zeal on the part of the ministers soon began to appear in a visible and astonish- ing improvement amongst the people. Blessed prepa- ration for the fiery trials in which they were so soon, ministers and people, to be involved ! On the death of Cromwell, on the 3d September 1658, the crown of Britain (for so it was, though the THE SCOTTISH COVENANTEES. 87 title of the -vvearer was Lord Protector instead of his ^Majesty the King) passed as easily from Oliver to Richard, as ever it had done from Tudor to Tudor, from Stuart to Stuart, or does now from Guelph to Guelph. The exiled family liad little hold upon England ; and in Scotland, if there was a national prejudice in their favour, it had been much cooled by the scandal of Charles's behaviour when in Scotland, by the opposition of the Protesters, and also by the prosperity and tran- quillity which had been enjoyed under the rule of Crom- well, Ireland, in its own kind of wild, confused way, threatened to be "up" for the king ; but owing to num- berless circumstances, Ireland could take no initiative in the events that were passing ; and could only, at the utmost, have achieved a riot or a massacre. The Stuarts had been long out of the country, and were now repre- sented only by a young libertine, incapable of any ex- traordinaiy etibrt or daring enterprise. The Cromwells were in possession ; and so they might have continued, had Richard possessed the nerve of Louis Napoleon, or been as lucky in his confederates. The nations were calm, still, and moderate, as Richard ascended the steps of the throne. But the moment it was perceived that he stood with tottering feet, and wavering and uncertain purpose, all was tumult and dis- order. Old parties reared their heads ; and new parties, who had been engendered in the confusions of the late years ; and still newer parties, vomited out in the troubles of the moment, plotting and speculating on the chances of the murky future. 88 THE FIFTY YEARS' STEUGGLE OF In England, there were of old parties, the Royalists, adherents of the Stuart dynasty, and zealots for the Church of England as part and parcel of their politics ; and Puritans (English Presbyterians), haters of Episco- pacy, asserters of the principles of the Solemn League and Covenant, and of Parliamentary or constitutional government. Of parties new, or even momentarily- formed, were the Protectorists, those attached by inter- est, or preference of any kind, to the Cromwell family ; the Republicans, as also the Independents, the whole brood of sectaries, and the body of common soldiers, who were mostly Republicans of the deepest dye ; and a motley group of adventurers ; single individuals, or little conspiring knots, who had no opinions, no seri- ous objects, no covenant, no sacred banner, but were actuated only by the hungry, wolf-like savageness, the disease of revolutionary times, which stimulates to the work of ravage and gorging, and plunder and destruc- tion. In Scotland, several of those types were wanting. There were no Protectorists, Republicans, or sectaries. But there were the old parties — the Royalists and the Presbyterians ; and there were abundance of adventurers, the spawn of the moment. There were also types which were wanting in England, at least in the exact kind. The Resolutioners, who were bound to the Covenants, but who would receive back the Stuarts on any, or no terms, rather than the old monarchy should perish ; and the Protesters, also bound to the Covenants, also inclined to monarchy, and to the Stuarts in the abstract, but who THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 89 would not receive them back, or assist in any such step, except upon the conditions of the Covenants, that is, upon the terms of limited monarchy. The parties in Ireland, for the reason above mentioned, I need not describe. No leading influence could emanate from thence ; but, generally, the parties there woidd go into the scale of Royalism. The Republicans of all the various different shades in England, and the Protesters in Scotland, were the only parties in the three kingdoms fixed in their opposition to the return of the Stuarts. But the Republicans and Protesters had no real affinity, and could never co- operate ; for the former were enemies to monarchy altogether ; whereas the latter were only opposed to absolute monarchy, and to the king's supremacy over the Church, but would readily unite to receive him on sufficient and trustworthy guarantees being given. Of all the parties now thrown into a state of ferment, there were two which undeniably were the strongest in point of numbers, of wealth, of rank and influence in society, and in the possession of all the old traditions, and old memories, and old sympathies of the country. These were, the Royalists and Presbyterians, both in England and in Scotland. Even singly and alone, each was formidable. If they should form a junction, what should resist their joint determinations ? But were not their antiijathies too keen, and had not these antipathies been too recently inflamed, the one against the other, ever to allow of their entering into combined action for any object whatever ? And, more- 90 • THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF over, was tliere not a lion in their path, which might well appal the stoutest heart 1 those iron legions, namely, scattered through the country, 50,000 strong, whom Cromwell had drilled and prayed into inspiration ; who, under his command, had trodden upon the high places of the earth ; who, on the fields of England, in the mountain-passes of Scotland, before the strengths of Ireland, had shared with him in those " crowning mer- cies" which Heaven distilled upon his head like the drops of the morning ; who abhorred the House of Stuart, as if the curse of Saul were upon it ; who ab- horred the Church of England, as the eldest daughter of Babylon ; and who, since the death of their chief, had held together, and still felt impelled to follow his mighty shade, as it seemed to beckon them on to the Beign of Saints ! In spite of all these difficulties, apparently insur- mountable, a coalition was at leng-th formed between the Royalists and Presbyterians ; but not the Presbyterian Protesters, who to the last opposed the return of Charles, except under suitable terms and conditions. In the flush and intoxication of the moment, the Royalists, with the English Presbyterians and the Scottish Resolutioners, prevailed ; and a sufficient armed force was brought to- gether for their protection and support. Common inte- rests and common party ends neutralized their mutual repulsion. George Monk was the secret, wily, wrinkled old alchemist, who extracted this coalition from so many discordant materials. This being accomplished, the result could not be doubtful. Charles ii. was re- THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 91 stored to liis dominious, and arrived in Loudon on the 29th of May IGGO. He was now in the prime of life, a'oout thirty years of age ; healthy and vigorous in body ; and if, from circumstances, not very carefully educated or accom- plished, this defect was almost compensated by his natu- ral cleverness and ready understanding. He had been long tried in the furnace of adversity ; he had been re- stored as by a miracle, which might well impress even the most frivolous mind ; and he was hailed by a people who welcomed in him a deliverer from the horrors of anarchy — a prince of the old line, who was to bring hope, relief, and peace, and cheerier, happier times. Such, no doubt, was the day-dream of the populace, always caught by the spangles outside ; never initiated in the farces or tragedies it may be, that are preparing behind the scenes. And so they kindled bonfires, and drank themselves blind, at every market-cross in the country. But, alas ! Charles, if so far, since we last met him in Scotland about ten years ago, he had been growing in experience of men and of the world, had equally been growing in all the vices we then obser^^ed, — in falsity, hollowness, idleness, profligacy, and in the voluptuary's rather than tlie tyrant's determination to be king with- out interference or control. " I have no desire," he once said to Lord Essex, " to sit like a Turk, and order men to be bowstringed ; but then, I will not suffer a set of fellows to be prying hito my private atlairs." Almost 92 THE FIFTY YEARS' STRUGGLE OF immediately upon his return, he abandoned himself en- tirely to pleasure, the only jewel in his estimation that made a crown worth having ; and although, in his off- hand, good-humoured, no-meaning way, he spoke pleasant things to everybody who approached him, he scarcely bestowed one moment's serious thought upon public business, or any affair of state, except where his own authority or his o^^^l personal feelings or habits were likely to be touched. He left everything to his vizier, Clarendon, and to hundreds of greedy, cruel, insatiable pashas, who immediately fastened open-mouthed upon the country. His truly wicked example, when it came to be seen and known of all men (for, as he was without virtue, so he was without shame), like the upas tree, dropped blasting and death upon his Court, upon the aristocracy, and less or more indeed upon all classes of the community. All historians bear confirming testi- mony to Roger Coke's assertion, that " King Charles left the nation more vitiated and debauched than ever it was by any other king." When monarchy was restored in 1660, Clarendon and the Anglican (or Church of England) Royalist party were masters of the situation. Their leading ideas were, to govern under the forms of legality ; but, above all, to revive Episcopacy, which had been abolished in England ; to impose it upon Scotland ; and to compel ecclesiastical uniformity and passive obedience in both kingdoms. This Anglican Ministry continued in power from 1660 to 1667 ; and so long the Court and the Anglicans worked in harmony. THE SCOTTISH COVENANTERS. 93 The return of Charles, with Clarendon as chief mini- ster, was a sufficient indication that there was a fore- gone design, in due time and season, to re-establish Episcopacy. But there was great difficulty in the way. The Pres- byterians in England and Scotland were too numerous and influential, and had too largely contributed to the Restoration, to be ofifended and set aside all at once ; and Charles, the reverse of his father, would have laughed at the idea of dying a martyr, or losing his throne, or even a good night's revelry, for any or all the sects in Christendom — perhaps for Christianity itself. He had a plain matter-of-fact shrewdness, possessed by none of his fiimily before him on the English throne, nor by the only one of his race that came after him. He could see what was practicable in the world. He could see the prose of things, and was not to be carried away by the fumes of zeal or fancy ; and beyond the practicable and workable, he would not commit himself. It is true, he ha