CENTRAL AFRICA, A REVIEW OF THE MEASURES ADOPTED FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE SLAVE TRADE FROM THENCE, and of THEIR EFFECTS ON THE INTERESTS OF BRITISH COMMERCE IN AFRICA ; AND SUGGESTIONS FOR GIVING TO THE NATIVES OF THESE REGIONS THE MEANS OF COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATION WITH THE COAST, AND THENCE DIRECT TO EUROPE. WITH A SHORT NOTICE OF THE KINGDOM OF BENIN, IN WESTERN AFRICA. BY ROBERT JAMIESON. LONDON: EFFINGHAM WILSON, Royal Exchange. _Sg I 1 c^'ona o ns^E To the British Public, Much misconception prevails both as to the measure of success which it is assumed, attended the operations of the British squadron on the African coasts, in its endeavours during a period of upwards of thirty years, to suppress the export of Negroes; and also with respect to the influence which those endeavours have exercised on the interests of British commerce in Africa. The first and second chapters of the following paper will supply information on these points, while they are also need- ful preliminaries to the third chapter, in which the various attempts which have been made to open commercial inter- course with Central Africa by the Niger, are briefly traced ; and suggestions are submitted for attempting this great purpose on other principles, and by other means than those which have hitherto been followed without approaching the accomplishment of the desired object: and for the clearer illustration of this chapter a map is appended, kindly sup- plied by Mr. Ariiowsmitii. IV The demand for Slave labour which has recently sprung' up afresh from Cuba, and the promptness with which it has been met from the shores of Africa, give evidence that extended demand only is necessary to create a revival of Slave trading on a large scale. The Slaves shipped on the coasts of Africa are brought from the countries of the inte- rior, and the only sure mode of giving to the traffic such a blow as shall be permanently felt, is to carry legitimate commerce into those regions, and so to stimulate the popula- tion to industrial pursuits on their own soil. It may be argued that as far as the character of the African of the interior is known, his love of ease, and want of energy and enterprise, will be obstacles to the accomplish- ment of this great purpose. But it must be borne in mind, that his aptitude for agricultural industry has never yet been fairly tested : his energies are still to be drawn out and stimulated by the spurring influences of commercial pur- suits ; and the grand desideratum is to get these to bear on the regions of Central Africa. It is not to be denied that there are difficulties to be overcome in the means suggested for the attainment of this object; but difficulties may often be overcome more easily than might have been apprehended before efforts have been put forth for overcoming them. The first great point in any undertaking is to make a commencement ; and so important V do I esteem this that I should feel wanting in duty did I longer hesitate to submit views, which are the result of my experience and observation during a period of years in the direction of commerce to Western Africa. Xhe fourth chapter has been added to call notice to the kingdom of Benin, a country of great extent, comparatively of easy access, and having the Niger for some distance its eastern boundry, yet of which little is known. I address myself to the British public rather than to the Government, because the enterprise proposed is one which must necessarily take years to mature, and would be more effectually carried out by an association of individuals zea- lous in the cause, than under Government direction. And, as the law now stands, opportunity is given for carrying out important purposes on this principle, without the danger of extended liability. I Avould therefore beg leave to suggest that an association should be formed for the purpose proposed, and that the means for its prosecution be raised by a general subscription. I have treated the subject purely commercially. It is, however, now universally acknowledged that commerce is the handmaid of civilization, and in this view it would be difficult to form a grander conception than that of the people of this country uniting in one common effort towards elevat- ing to the blessings of civilization, so large a portion of our fellow men sunk in deep ignorance and degradation in these remote regions of Africa. ROBERT JAMIESON. Gloucester Square, London, January, 1859. CHAPTER I. The African Slave Trade and the Attempt at its Suppression. For some years previous to 1850-51, the export of Negroes from Africa was almost wholly to Brazil. The export to Cuba, at one time so large, had then all but ceased in consequence of the Cuban authorities, for reasons of their own, putting a stop to the import.* In the years named the Government of Brazil determined to do so likewise, and this they effected by the adoption of stringent measures at the harbours and along the coasts of the Empire for preventing the landing of Negroes. For upwards of thirty years preceding the above men- tioned period, England had endeavoured to suppress the export from Africa, by means of treaties with foreign Powers, and by the maintenance of a squadron on the African coast to enforce the terms of these treaties ; — with what results, wdl be seen by a perusal of the following pages, based mainly upon the evidence given before the select Committees of both Houses of Parliament, which sat on the Slave trade,— the Commons’ in 1847-48, and the Lords’ in 1849-50. Accompanying the Reports of the Commons’ Committee, * “ Is it not the fact that the Government of Cuba has successfully prevented the Slave Trade at the present time in that Island? I believe the Government of Cuba has done so during the last two years. I am obliged to suppose so, because that is the only method of account- ing for the great diminution in the importation of Slaves into Cuba.” Lord Palmerston before the Commons' Committee , March , 1848. 8 there is a memorandum of the estimated annual export of Slaves from Africa, from the year 1788 to the year 1847, which we adopt for reference, as the best statistical document of the kind extant. These exports are stated as follows : — In From 1788, . . . 100,000 yearly average. 1798 to 1805, 85,000 1805 to 1810, 85,000 „ 1810 to 1815, 93,000 „ 1815 to 1817, 106,000 „ 1817 to 1819, 106,000 1819 to 1825, 103,000 1825 to 1830, 125,000 1830 to 1835, 78,500 „ 1835 to 1840, 135,800 In 1840, 64,114 1841, 45,097 1842, 28,400 1843, 55,062 1844, 54,102 1845, 36,785 1846, 76,117 1847, 84,356 The computed casualties after shipment are stated in the memorandum, but these it is not deemed necessary to quote, as the question before us is, whether the export was diminished by the measures adopted for its prevention. The abolition of Slave-trading under the flag of England took place, it will be remembered, in the year 1807. At that period, as appears from the above figures, the export of Negroes was about 85,000 annually ; that is, when the trade was a legal one to the whole world, and when England 9 herself had been largely engaged in it. It would seem as if England in thus taking the initiative had expected that her good example in 1807 would be followed by other nations; but this did not prove to be the case, and the trade continued to be freely prosecuted by them until the year 1817. Indeed, it will be seen that during the intervening ten years the export had risen from 85,000 to 106,000 annually. Disap- pointed, as might be supposed, with this issue, England then urged Spain and Portugal, the two Powers whose flags were most extensively used in the traffic, to enter into treaties for its suppression, to which, for a consideration, they assented : Spain for its suppression on the coasts of Africa generally, but Portugal on the coasts north of the equator only, and this on the understanding that the trade should remain legal to her flag on the coasts south of that line, so long as she might hold trans-atlantic possessions. In compensation for the loss resulting from these concessions, England paid to Spain £400,000, and to Portugal £300,000, besides cancell- ing a debt of £600,000 due by her to England. Neither of these treaties gave any power for the detention or capture of Slavers on the northern coasts unless Slaves were actually on board, and their inefficiency for the prevention of the export accordingly soon became manifest. Slave traders speedily discovered, that, in defiance of these treaties, they might sail their ships to those coasts, equipped in all respects for the purchase and conveyance over seas of Slaves, without being liable to molestation by British cruisers, well aware that so long as they had no Slaves on board they could not be touched. Thus prepared for the prosecution of the traffic on the northern coasts, (the Negroes of which are considered stronger and more suitable for heavy work than those of southern latitudes,) they sailed to and fro along the shores, 10 or anchored in rivers, watching for opportunities in the absence of our cruisers to embark their cargoes and be off to sea. The Slaves, as is well known, were collected in barra- coons by agents on shore, who communicated with the ships by concerted signals (at night by lights) and, when the desired opportunity presented itself, the Slaves in a few hours were put on board, and the vessel once out to sea, the danger of capture was small. In this way the export from the northern coasts continued, with great aggravation of suffering and increase of mortality among the Negroes — brought to the coast from distant parts of the interior — cooped up in barracoons while awaiting shipment — indiffe- rently supplied with food and even water, and often all but famished previous to their shipment when embarcation was long protracted — then in hot haste huddled on board, not unfrequently through heavy surfs, and miserably stowed away in the hold in much greater numbers than the ship should carry or was supplied for. They were thus carried out to sea upon a long voyage, to put to the test the power of human endurance. While the export was going on in this manner to a greater or less extent north of the equator, it was free to the flag of Portugal and to all who chose to use that flag, in lati- tudes south of the line ; and this remained so from the time that the treaties of 1817 came into operation, until 1835, within which period the annual average export of Slaves which touched 125,000 in the five years ending in 1830, fell to 78,500 in the five years ending in 1835 — a diminution which the issue of the next five years determines to have arisen from other causes than the prevention of the export by the squadron, as will presently be seen. In 1835 Spain entered into a new treaty with England, 11 called an equipment article treaty, by which a mutual right of search of merchant vessels, and of detention if equip- ments used in Slave-trading were found on board, was conceded; adjudication being vested in Courts of mixed Commission ; but Portugal did not enter into any new treaty, and the result was that Spanish Slave-traders simply substituted the Portuguese flag, under which the whole Slave trade of Africa was thence-forwmrd prosecuted, down to 1840, during which period of five years the average annual export reached 135,800. To check this growing evil, the British Government in 1839 assumed to itself extraordinary powers, and without regard to the will of Portugal passed an Act of Parliament, authorising the search and detention by our cruisers, of all vessels sailing under the Portuguese flag, on all parts of the African coasts. At this time, it must be kept in mind, the Slave trade was legal by treaty to the flag of Portugal south of the equator, and was being openly prosecuted under it — Slave traders having factories on shore, furnished with all manner of stores and merchandise suitable for its prosecution. It was now declared by a British Act of Parliament to be ille- gal, and the suddenness with which this measure was given effect to by our cruisers, without any previous intimation of it whatever, took the Slave traders altogether by surprise. Not only were their vessels seized, and detained for adjudi- cation in our Admiralty Courts (in terms of the Act of Parliament), but armed men were landed to burn and destroy their factories, with all the stores &c. which they contained. A great blow was thus given to the export of Slaves, and, from the annual amount of 135,800 in the five years pre- ceding 1840, the number now fell to 64,000 in that year, and to 28,400 in 1842. The success, however, that thus attended this extra- ordinary assumption of power by England, and which cannot be regarded as legitimate, terminated upon the repeal of the Act of Parliament in the year 1842 when Portugal, at last yielding to the will of England, concluded an equipment article treaty, declaring Slave trade to be unlawful under her flag in both hemispheres. Slave traders now turned their attention to the flags of nations whose treaties with England did not recognise the right of search, as was the case with those of France, and of ' the United States of America, — and they found the latter peculiarly suited to their purpose, notwithstanding that America was bound by treaty to keep a naval force upon the African ooast, adequate to the prevention of the abuse of her flag in Slave trading. Stores and equipments were now shipped upon vessels carrying the American flag, and the trade was prosecuted in the manner described by Mr. Stavely of the Foreign Office, in his evidence before the Committee of the House of Lords, in April, 1849, as follows : — “ They go out to the coast of Africa as American vessels, and so long as they wear the garb of American nationality our cruisers cannot meddle with them, but they have always a number of Spanish, Portuguese, or Brazilian passengers on board, and if they find a cargo of Slaves ready in the barracoons, they in a very few hours embark the Slaves. Then the American papers are put away, the American master and crew become passengers, and the Spanish, Portuguese, or Brazilian passengers assume the character of master and crew ; the Portugese, Brazilian, or Spanish flag is hoisted, and away they go, taking the chance of making the run without being intercepted. In this way, these vessels i J escape molestation, altogether, on the passage to Africa, unless they fall in with an American cruiser, and even she can only search ; she cannot detain them, according to the American law, unless there be Slaves found on board. Then, on their return passage to Brazil when Slaves are on board, the change of flag saves them from this detention, and from capture by any but British cruisers; and the capture of vessels under the colours now adopted, namely Spanish, Portuguese, or Brazilian, renders them by treaty liable to confiscation only— the crew are not subject to any punishment. Were the capture made under the United States’ flag, the crew would be subject to death — Slave trade being piracy by the American law.” Be it observed, that the American law as thus stated by Mr. Stavely, does not permit detention of merchant ships, even if found equipped for Slave trading after the manner de- scribed. The American cruisers can only detain, and send (to the U. S. Courts) for adjudication, vessels having Slaves actually on board, and it will be seen that, under the system practised, this never takes place. The maintenance by the United States of a squadron on the coast to watch her flag was thus reduced to a mere sham. Sir Charles Hotham, who commanded the British squadron, was asked by the Lords’ Committee, in May, 1849, “Did the American squadron interfere in any way in the suppression of the Slave trade ? ” to which he replied, “ Only in one instance, to the best of my recollection, and for so interfering the officer got into great difficulty with his Government. He watched and captured a ship that evidently intended to take a cargo of Negroes across, — she w T as at that time of course under the American flag, — he sent her to New York. It was found by the commander that the trial was nearly concluded, and Was going entirely against him, when he arrived at the port of New York, made his appearance in Court, and obtained a milder sentence, but not more than that. She was fitted for shipping Slaves — the master avowed his intention of shipping Slaves — and she had on board the most notorious Slave dealer on the coast.” The French flag too, it is understood, assisted in the traffic to a minor extent ; and the flag of Sardinia was like- wise available for it, because, although the right of search and detention was conceded in the treaty with that power, the right of trial of vessels captured was reserved to Sardi- nian Courts only. Sir Charles Hotham, on being asked, “ Why were you prevented from capturing Slavers under the Sardinian flag ? ” replied, “ There were two instances of captured vessels being sent to Genoa and being released, although the evidence was entirely in favor of the captors. After that, our officers became of course naturally distrust- ful, and unless the case was a very glaring one (which never occurred), they would not interfere with a Sardinian vessel.” Under these circumstances the export of Slaves revived, and the numbers increased from 28,400 in 1842, to 55,062 in 1843, and to 84,350 in 1847. The memorandum of exports accompanying the Report of the Commons’ Com- mittee extends no further than 1847, but it is well known that the exports of 1848 and 1849 were upon a still larger scale, directed almost wholly to Brazil. It is not for us to discuss the merits or demerits of the policy which led our Government to domineer over Brazil in respect of the Slave trade in 1850, nor to enquire into the motives which led the Government of that Empire to prohibit further importations of Negroes into it, causing as a natural consequence a suspension pro tanto of the exports 15 from Africa, which continues to this day. It suffices that we have given a brief outline of the history of the attempt to suppress the export of Negroes from Africa by forcible means on the African coasts, and have shown that at the end of thirty years’ exertion for this object, the annual export, that is in 1847-48-49, was as large as the annual average export during the period from 1798 to 1805, when Slave trading was open to all the nations of the world, and England herself actively engaged in it. And this with a large number of ships of war upon the coasts of Africa, — many of them steamers, and in a higher state of efficiency than at any former time. And what have been the results of this fruitless crusade ? To England, a great sacrifice of valuable life in fleets cruizing off unhealthy shores, and an expenditure of millions of the public money : and to Africa, a fearful aggravation of the sufferings and increase in the mortality, of her miserable serfs before and after embarcation ! CHAPTER II. The influences of Slave Trade Suppression Trea- ties on the Interests of British Commerce in Africa. In pointing out the effects which the measures adopted in attempting to suppress the export of Negroes from Africa have had on the interests of British commerce, we shall begin with that which has been considered to be, of all others, the most important as a means of suppression, — the Equipment Article Treaties with foreign powers. The articles enumerated in those treaties, as equipments affording proof of an intention to prosecute Slave trading, are so many, that no ship engaged in lawful commerce can be without a greater or less number of them. Palm oil trading ships for instance, have of necessity to carry many of those articles either in themselves proscribed or proscribed in regard to quantities. The trade cannot be prosecuted otherwise. In consequence of this, the owners of British ships in that trade give bond to the custom house autho- rities, that these articles shall not be used for Slave trading purposes ; and certificates to this effect from IT. M. customs are respected by commanders of our own ships of war on the African coasts, but they are not so by the commanders of the ships of war of the foreign powers who have concluded equipment article treaties with us. Such documents are not recognized as legal evidence by these commanders, who have power by the terms of the treaty to detain the ships, and — 17 send them for trial by mixed Courts of Commission. Con- demnation and confiscation are in such a case certain, seeing it is indisputable that many of the proscribed articles were on board ; and, the judgment pronounced by the mixed Court being final, there is no appeal or means of redress of any kind. Virtually, therefore, the whole British palm oil trade of Africa, amounting in 1857 to 42,720 tons, is carried on by sufferance of the foreign powers with whom we have such treaties. As yet no evil has resulted from this state of things, excepting on the coast south of the line, where Portugal has colonial possessions, and her men of w’ar are fallen in with. On that coast a promising British commerce was in course of development, when Slave trading there was legal under the Portuguese flag ; but no sooner did Portugal make the traffic unlawful, by entering into the equipment article treaty before spoken of, than the annoyance to our merchantmen from search and detention by Portuguese cruisers became intolera- ble ; resulting in the seizure, trial, and final condemnation of a ship from Liverpool, and causing the withdrawal of some of the principal merchants engaged in this, until then, unmolested and rising trade. This vessel, the Lady Sale, had been dispatched from Liverpool by a house of the highest respectability to prosecute the palm oil trade on the Zaire or Congo river, but was obliged to leave it from not meeting with the success expected. At the time of her capture, she had on board a greater quantity of water than is allowed by equipment article treaties, the principal part of which had been taken in on the Congo as ballast, and was quite unfit for human use, being in palm oil casks. She had also more rice than is allowed by these treaties ; this article having been laid in for the food of Kroomen who were engaged upon the coast, 18 as is usual, in order to save the European crew of the ship from the heavy part of the work of the palm oil trade. She had also on board an iron boiler or large pot, which was abso- lutely necessary for testing the qualities of the oil, that being done by boiling. These articles form part of those proscribed, and the fact of their having been found on board was held to be proof of an intention to prosecute Slave trading, and was the cause of the ship’s condemnation. Of course this put an end to any further palm oil trading on the Congo, but the application of those treaties to British shipping extends equally to all parts of the African coasts, north and south. The having on board any one of the proscribed articles would justify the condemnation and con- fiscation of a ship, and thereby the owner is placed in this position ; — He is, by the sentence of the court, held to have entered upon an illegal voyage — his policies of insurance become thereby void — and the ship and cargo are irretriev- ably lost to him. The ship above alluded to was, it is true, after a length of time and the loss of a voyage, restored ; but only as an act of grace. The fairness of the capture and trial, and the soundness of the judgment pronounced, according to the text of the treaty, were maintained by the Portuguese authorities, and could not be questioned by those of England. What a serious hindrance is thus presented to the spread of British commerce on the southern coasts, and in what jeopardy is the whole British palm oil trade with Africa placed, by treaties of our own formation, and by ourselves urged upon foreign Powers ! Another class of treaties considered to be of great impor- tance as a means of Slave trade suppression, but which in their operation are inimical to the spread of British commerce in Africa, are those entered into with native kings and chiefs 19 foi* the relinquishment of Slave dealing, — or, more properly speaking, for the relinquishment of the practice of selling Slaves for exportation. A theory is got up and propounded to them by the officers of the squadron, to the effect that Slave trade and lawful commerce cannot co-exist, — that the one must be relinquished before the other can be formed, and that if treaties with England be entered into whereby Slave trading shall be relinquished, lawful commerce will come in and compensate for the loss. The poor ignorant men five credence to this doctrine, and, dazzled by the O receipt of presents as from the Queen of England, put their marks to papers the nature of which they cannot be supposed to comprehend. Dealing in Slaves is suspended, and the immediate advent of the promised lawful commerce is anticipated as a necessary consequence ; but it does not come, — for commerce, as every sensible man knows, cannot be formed in a day, or in a year. Disappointment and a return to Slave selling are the natural consequences. This, how- ever, is an infringement of the treaty, and the issue is illus- trated by what took place, under such circumstances, with the Chiefs on the river Gallinas. A fleet of British men of war assembled at its mouth, and on the 3rd i ebruary, 1849, landed 300 armed men, who burned to the ground, towns, villages, and stores, with all the property in them, to the distance of about twenty miles up its banks. Lawful com- merce is of slow growth, and can only take root where there is continuous mutual friendliness and good faith ; but here the chiefs are deceived, and with their people are made our enemies. But the most grievous part of the matter, is, that the theory on which those treaties is based, namely, that lawful commerce cannot co-exist with Slave trade, is fallacious. 20 The doctrine, nevertheless, is preached up by certain parties at home, and is apt to impress the public mind with the idea that the commerce which exists with Africa must have risen up in localities where no Slave trading was prosecuted, or where it had first been put down by the squadron. We shall prove that the theory and this deduction from it are alike erroneous. This is so far done by what has already been stated, namely, that while the Slave trade was legal to the Portu- guese flag on the south coasts of Africa, and was prosecuted without let or hindrance under it, lawful commerce was at the same time prosecuted there. And further, the evidence of Capt. Matson who commanded a ship of the squadron when the onslaught was made upon the traffic on these coasts in 1840-41-42, may be quoted as to the fact: — “ At Ambriz,” said he, to the Commons’ Committee, “ when the five Slave factories were burned, there were five or six or seven other factories that were legal factories, — English, American, German, — they were not touched — they were all full of goods; the same trade was going on — the Slave trade in one factory, and legal trade in the other.” But the history of the rise and progress of the palm oil trade now flourishing in the Bight of Biafra on the north coast, furnishes very interesting and satisfactory proof on the ques- tion. This commerce dates its commencement so early as from the time when Slave trade was legally prosecuted by subjects of England. The Supercargoes of ships from Liverpool, while lying in the Bight for the purchase of their Slave cargoes, bought also such palm oil as was offered (in very small quantities) for sale; the article, so far as it went, being useful as ballast on the voyage tfTThe West 21 Indies, as well as remunerative when forwarded thence for sale at Liverpool. Upon the abolition of Slave trading by England, this incipient commerce — an off-shoot as it were of the Slave trade — was followed up by the merchants of Liverpool. From custom hottse and other documents, it is estimated that the palm oil received from the Bight of Biafra at that port in the year 1806 was 150 tons, in 1809 upwards of 600 tons, in 1819 upwards of 3000 tons, in 1829 upwards of 8000 tons, and in 1839 it was 13,600 tons, giving a value, at the then price of the oil, of nearly half a million sterling. During the whole of this period the Slave trade was prose- cuted in the Bight, the Slaves and the palm oil being both supplied under the auspices of the same kings and chiefs. The enormous extent to which Slave traffic is represented as having been carried in 1820-21, appears from a despatch of Sir Charles Mac Carthy, presented to Parliament in 1822, along with other papers relating to Slave trade, namely, that “ during the nine months from October, 1820 to July, 1821, 190 cargoes of Slaves were taken out of the river Bonny, and 162 out of the Old Calabar.” This was quoted by Capt. Denman, in his evidence before the Lords’ Committee of 1849-50. Before the same Committee, Mr. Dawson, a merchant of Liverpool prosecuting the palm oil trade in the Bight of Biafra, stated, that “in 1830 he had seen as many as 17 Slavers in the river Bonny at one time, some of them very large ships.” And Capt. Denman further stated, that when he was on the coast in 1834-35, “ the Bight of Biafra was the great focus of Slave traffic, north of the equator.” By 1839, however, the export of Slaves from the Bight had ceased, leaving in its place a trade in palm oil, which by 22 that time had expanded (as has been already stated) to 13,600 tons. At the end of the next ten years, namely, in 1849, the import from thence into Liverpool was estimated at upwards of 15,700 tons. In one of these years however, 1845, it touched 18,040 tons, and, assuming this to have been the highest point of the import for that period, the remarkable fact is brought out, that during those ten years, when the Bight was free from Slave trading, the palm oil trade did not progress in so great a ratio, as it had done in the ten years preceding, when Slave trading was actively prosecuted. What then becomes of this theory, and of what value are the treaties based upon it ? The theory, we submit, has been proved to be utterly erroneous ; and this being the case, what shall we say of the treaties ? It is true that witnesses have come before the Parliamentary Committees, who, without having given to the question sufficient considera- tion, or having bestowed upon it due enquiry, have stated it as their opinion that lawful commerce cannot exist in contact with Slave trading. But the preceding pages contain ample evidence not only that the contrary was the fact at Ambriz and elsewhere on the south coast ; but that, for thirty years from its rise, the palm oil trade of the Bight of Biafra on the north coast flourished in the midst of the traffic : and we may add this gratifying and important fact, was in the end the means of banishing it, as we trust and believe for ever, from the Bight. CHAPTER III. The Extension of Commercial Intercourse to the Interior of Western Africa. The fallacy of the doctrine that lawful commerce cannot exist in contact with the Slave trade, and the injurious effects which the measures based upon such a doctrine have had upon the interests of British commerce with Africa being thus exposed, the way is so far clear for considering the best means of extending commercial intercourse into the regions of Central Africa, watered by the river Niger and its con- fluent the Chadda. And if we examine into the causes which have led to the advancement of the palm oil trade in the Bight of Biafra, we shall find data that may enable us to arrive at the best mode of procedure for attaining the desired object. But first, let us show the progress which has been made by that trade down to the present time. We have, in the preceding pages, traced it from its commencement in 1806, to the year 1849, during which period the annual export of oil rose from 150 tons to 15,700 tons, and we have now to state that it continued to increase in the years which followed, and that in the year 1857 it amounted to 26,050 tons, landed at the port of Liverpool alone ;* to which if we add the * The oil imported from the Bight into Liverpool during the past year (1858) through the ordinary channel (namely, in merchant shipp- ing), amounted to 20,300 tons ; besides which, 3600 tons were imported in the African mail steamers which now run to Liverpool. It is believed comparatively small quantity of 2500 tons shipped to other ports, the exports from the Bight may be stated at two thirds of the total import of palm oil from Africa to Great Britain during that year, as given in the Board of Trade returns, namely, 42,720 tons. And now with respect to the causes which have led to this wonderful advancement ; one, and a significantly impor- tant one was, that the trade in its first and more tender stages had the good fortune to be let alone. There was no jarring by interference with the Slave trade as it then existed in the Bight, or with the habits, customs, and pre- judices of the people ; and before the chiefs were invited to enter into treaties with England, Slave trading had ceased. Another cause was, that the trade was conducted directly under the auspices of the kings and chiefs, who found themselves and their people benefited by it, and therefore encouraged its promotion. And a third and most important cause was, that the trade was an open one on equal terms to all who chose to engage in it, and by this means the benefit of competition, regulating values in the interchange of com- modities according to supply and demand, was kept up ; the natives obtained full value for their oil in barter for the merchandise they were in want of, and thus their industry was stimulated and maintained. For the present the palm oil trade absorbs all the available labour of the Bight ; but there can be no doubt, that if labourers were plentiful, other tropical products suitable for the purposes of commerce would be cultivated and prepared. If, then, the same elements were brought to bear upon that a large portion of this was from the Bight of Biafra ; still there is a falling off for the year as compared with 1857, which is attributed to local troubles at Bonny, that for a time suspended the trade. 25 the promotion of commerce with Central Africa, there can be little question of the eventual issue being as prosper- ous there, as it has proved in the Bight of Biafra. The first of these elements is in our own hands : as far as our inter- course with those regions has hitherto gone, kings, chiefs, and people, have shown the greatest desire to be friendly, and to become connected with us in commerce ; and why should not this be reciprocated by us, without any intermeddling with their internal affairs ? The second referred to, was the direct encouragement which the kings and chiefs in the Bight of Biafra gave to the promotion of industry among their people, by their being themselves personally engaged in trade. This would soon be developed in Central Africa also. The benefits which would accrue to both chiefs and people from such a course would very speedily be seen and appreciated. And in regard to the third and most important element — wholesome competition — how is that to be brought to bear ? How is the stimulus to industry, arising from general supply and demand, to be brought into operation in regions so dis- tant and difficult of approach ? The experience of the past gives proof that this must be attained by other means than the expensive one hitherto pursued, of navigating the rivers by steam vessels. It is now a quarter of a century since the first attempt to open commerce with those regions in this way was made, and failed of success. This was a commercial expedition, consisting of two steamers, equipped and dispatched from Liverpool, in 1832-33, by an association of merchants, and conducted by Messrs. Laird, Oldfield, and others. The Niger was ascended as high as to the town of Rabbah, some 500 miles from the coast, and the Chadda was also ascended to some distance ; but the heavy expenditure proved ruinous to the enterprise, and its further prosecution was abandoned. 2(1 Again it is nearly twenty years since the second attempt was made by the less expensive means of one steamer, — the Ethiope, built by the writer for the purpose, who appointed Mr. Becroft to the command, and to the conducting of the adventure, in conjunction with his surgeons Messrs. King and Moffat. The Niger was in this instance navigated to a point above Rabbah, some 50 miles below the town of Busah, where it is supposed the celebrated traveller Mungo Bark perished; here further progress was stopped by strong rapids which could not be passed by a vessel of the Ethiope' a steam power (30 horses). This voyage also was seriously damaged by the heavy expenditure of the steamer. Nevertheless, the proceeds of the produce obtained were to such an amount, as gave a ground of hope that by a continuous series of such ascents, the trade transacted might gradually increase, so as eventually to defray expenditure, and afford remuneration. The government expedition to the Niger of T841-42, next followed, consisting of three steamers, — the Albert, Wilber force, and Soudan, — sent out professedly for the advancement of commerce and agriculture in Central Africa, but which, in the opinion of merchants then engaged in trade to Africa, was not likely to accomplish that object, — of which more as we proceed. The disastrous results of this expedi- tion are before the world, and it will always be a source of satisfaction to the writer that he gave timely warning of the probable consequences; and, that this being unheeded, he gave such instructions to Capt. Becroft (who was still on the coast in command of the Ethiope ) as enabled him to render impor- tant succour to the Albert when in distress up the Niger. Again, after the lapse of some years, a further experi- ment to form commercial intercourse by steam navigation un the Niger, was attempted under the direction of the writer : 27 subscriptions having been entered into by a number of mercantile men, and others not connected with commerce, of London, Liverpool, Manchester, and Glasgow, to form a guarantee fund against expenses and possible results, the Niger was again ascended to Kabbah by the Ethiope, com- manded as before by Capt. Becroft, and with Mr. Kino as surgeon and supercargo ; but the adventure commercially fell so far short of expectation, and was attended by so many adverse contingencies, that further prosecution of the experi- ment was relinquished. Since then, the Chadda, the confluent of the Niger, has been successfully explored by Dr. Baikie, in the Pleiad steamer, under the auspices of government, and the direction of Mr. MACGREGOR Laird; and that gentleman has just returned to the coast from an ascent of the Niger under the -same auspices and direction. But these missions, supported by pecuniary grants from government, must be looked upon, more as exploratory and scientific than commercial. Out of them, however, a project has arisen for the prosecution of trade upon the river by a Joint S' o k ( ompany, of which notice will be taken as we proceed. At present it is our purpose to show the difficulties that stand in the way ol the formation of general commerce with Central Africa by steam navigation upon the Niger, — difficulties which have not hitherto been sufficiently considered. In the first place, the danger to life in passing the unhealthy swamps of the Delta, although lessened by the employment of Africans for ships’ crews, and by the use of quinine and other precautionary measures, must always be a great barrier to the promotion of general commerce with the interior by that channel. In the next place, the cost of steam vessels and the heavy 28 expenditure attending their navigation to, and in, such remote regions, (not to speak of the heavy responsibilities arising from casualties,) inevitably enhance the cost of the merchan- dize to be bartered for produce in Central Africa, to a degree such as the limited extent of trade cannot bear. And even if produce were obtainable in much larger quantity, it would require to be purchaseable at very low prices, in order to defray such heavy expenditure, not to say a word of remu- neration; and in such a case no encouragement would be given to call out and stimulate native industry. Commerce must be remunerative to all parties engaged in it, to be lasting, — to be lasting it must become general, — and must be general to become competitive, and there is no prospect of commerce attaining and passing through those stages in Central Africa by means of steam navigation on its waters. The project of a J oint Stock Company above alluded to, carries with it in its details the appearance of partially over- coming these difficulties, inasmuch as the heavy expenditure of steamers would, in some measure, be lessened by what is proposed, namely, to plant trading stations at various parts of the rivers in the interior, for the collection of produce in barter with the natives ; those stations to be visited periodi- cally by a steam vessel with flat bottomed launches in tow, bearing supplies of fresh merchandize, and conveying to the coast in return the produce collected. This mode of prose- cuting the trade is now being followed, aided by annual subsidies from government; and the object of the scheme projected is to extend existing operations by the formation of a J oint Stock Company with limited liability. Of course the ground-work of this project is a desire to advance .com- mercial intercourse in those quarters, but it is not difficult to see that while the commerce transacted might, with govern- 29 ment aid, be remunerative to those conducting it, its ostensi- ble object would not be accomplished. For a commercial company with limited liability on the one hand, and support from grants of the public money on the other, would form a monopoly to the utter exclusion of general supply and demand. Though it might be remunerative to the English shareholders it would be devoid of that essential element for the development of native industrial resources, — competition, and instead of being a means towards the expansion of general commerce with Central Africa, would retard it. Nor would the purposes intended to have been carried out by the government expedition before referred to, have had any other result, supposing that the river fever had not put a stop to the enterprise, by causing a prompt return of the steamers to the coast. Those purposes were mainly — to make treaties with the kings and chiefs of the interior, such as have already been alluded to, for the suppression of dealing in Slaves ; and to enter into arrangements for the purchase of territory on which to plant a British settlement, professedly to initiate the population of the interior in the culture and preparation of productions suitable for exchange in commerce. Only two such treaties were concluded, — one with the chief of Eboe, the first considerable place come to in ascending the Niger, just above the Delta, — the other with the chief of Iddah, the next considerable place; and an incident which occurred a few days after the signing of the latter, strikingly developed their mischievous practical opera- tions. The circumstances (abridged from Thomson and Allens' published narrative of the expedition) were shortly these : Capt. Trotter of the steamer A Ibert, in ascending the river, fell in with a large canoe descending, belonging to the chief 30 of Muye, and in charge of his son. It contained three Slaves, a male and two females, three horses, and other property, pur- chased at the market of Egga. “ As Muye is in the territory “ of the chief of Iddah, the canoe, Slaves, horses, &<*., were