MASTER NEGATIVE NO. 94-82001 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials including foreign works under certain conditions. In addition, the United States extends protection to foreign works by means of various international conventions, bilateral agreements, and proclamations. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. The Columbia University Libraries reserve the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in Its judgement, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of the copyright law. Author: Lowe, Boutelle Ellsworth Title: Representative industry and trade unionism of... Place: New York Date: [1912] qi\-'^aoo\-\ MASTER NEGATIVE « COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES PRESERVATION DIVISION BIBLIOGRAPHIC MICROFORM TARGET ORIGINAL MATERIAL AS FILMED - EXISTING BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD 267 L95 Lowe, Boutelle Ellsworth, 1890- Ilepresentative industry and trade unionism of an American city, by Boutelle Elsworth Lowe... How York, Gray £l91J>, vii, 78 p. 19 cm, A study of tho industrial development of Roches^ ter, II, Y, Bibliographys p. 78, RESTRICTIONS ON USE: TECHNICAL MICROFORM DATA RLM SIZE: 3S^ry^fv^ REDUCTION RATIO: \Q:\ IMAGE PLACEMENT: lA ^ IB IIB DATE FILMED: 3-9^-^^ TRACKING #: /ISH 0009.7 INITIALS: ^ FILMED BY PRESERVATION RESOURCES. BETHLEHEM. PA. GO 3 3 cr Is CO en OOM O 3 3 > o m (DO OQ CO N X M a a'' A* ^? SsT?- > ^p•: m o 3 i *v ^; s i a *< <^ <^ ■•?. =fp fcp ^* fp ^fvT O f"ni;PEC|!|5 o S IS to in 1.0 mm 1.5 mm 2.0 mm *aCOEFGHIJKlMNOPtJRSTUVWXYZ •bCltotlhiitilmnopqrstuvwiyz 1 234567890 ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890 ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890 ^o ^fp ^^ m H o ■o m "o > C CO I TJ ^ 0(/) 5 m 3D O m ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 2.5 mm 1234567890 C^ 3 3 O J, 1^ I? ■o ^ 0 ■ o 3 3 0> Is N c/) OOM # ■ -' :1||i»'?--^''^'*>^3/£|a,^|- K M ft jm '•i' l-^TL-J i^M;-:.;! :■'«»;■ acHpKj ipuji fHipBiqf' Plfl| m. iii Odiriaillii 'SuM^rmHMm] IfUmi « iilifikft! ]L.iQ-mm ln'Ti;;#!-:;i;.; "■mm f ■S-iui-tll ri'*'H^'! !;*:1 Jit! iiii i iiiilM If I R tVA % ii ill! •i» . > *■>/• •/*•. ^ '•.-■'.■f-iifK'* -S ^ J* i ■ • ■ L35 Columbia Bntbersittp tn tte dtp of ^etD §orfc LIBRARY This book is due two weeks from the last date ped below, and if not returned or renewed at or before that time a fine of five cents a day will^be incurred. School of Business «^ 1 ' -1 ) — 4 r t i : ; ^ \ ■ i .^.^^ a^^^ . I Representative Industry and Trade Unionism of an American City BY BOUTELLE ELSWORTH LOWE, A. M. Published by W. D. GRAY 106 SEVENTH AVENUE NEW YORK .*^ ^ i J juiui^A.,^-^*-^^^ , ^ '1\.. ^ Cf j0tmmmmt0^ US FOREWORD Rochester is the third largest city in the State of New York, possessing a population of approximately 230,000. It IS neither a large city nor a small city but an aver- age American city reflecting, in certain respects, average mdustrial conditions in the United States. If, for ex- ample, we draw a comparison between the United States and this city in respect of the five leading causes of strikes, we find that the same causes in the same order of importance hold equally good for the city as for the nation during the last twenty-five years. Again we find that when during 1889-1890 the percentage of successful stnkes m the United States was above the average the same was true of Rochester; and when during 1892- 1894 the percentage was below the average, again the same held true for Rochester, and when during 1890- 1905 the percentage rose approximately to 8 per cent above the average throughout the country, it likewise rose to 9 per cent in this city. In some respects the city's industrial status is quite superior to average Amerid mto the treasury of the Exchange by the employ- ers) pa,d ,n to stand together and break up the lScI of our order .... They (manufacturers) have the 5? tnct attorney of Rochester in their employ to send ihe members of our district board to the state prison " The unionists were not without their supporters. The t^^f Express came out with the following: "We think the clothmg manufacturers were wrong in declaring that they would en:p,oy no Knights of Labor." In comment- ing on th,s statement, an editorial of the Times for March 25, 1891, said: "You think so. We know that they are wrong." The lockout nevertheless proved disastrous to the Knights. It has been averred that only 5, members re- mamed m the ranks of the cutters' union. An editorial of the T^mes for April ,, ,891. stated that the employers were allowmg their men to go back to the factories on cond.t.on that they had severed all relations with the Knights of Labor. Reorganization and Progress After the Lockout -^ot long after these events, another cutters' union was form- ea by the United Garment Workers of America, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, under the direc- tion of a Mr. White, who, it is confidently avowed bv some, though not admitting of adequate proof, formed this loca union with an understanding between the cloth- ing employers of the city and himself, for the purpose of nullifying the effects among labor sympathizers of the 56 OF AN AMERICAN CITY boycott instituted by the Knights of Labor against Rochester-made clothing. In support of this supposi- tion, the words of Mr. Chambers, President of the Cut- ters' Union, in the Rochester Labor Journal, Oct. 24, 1903, may be noted: "Moreover, the present union (Cut- ters No. 136 of U. G. W. A.) is a creation of the manu- facturers of this city brought into being some time after Hughes had been disposed of." It certainly appears strange that the employers should countenance the form- ation of a union so soon after the struggle with the Knights of Labor, unless they had some ulterior end in view; while, on the other hand, it does not seem at all strange that members of the American Federation of Labor should be found willing by them to antagonize a definite policy of the Knights. That very bitter enmity existed between the two Orders was evidenced by an incident which occurred in the city before the lockout. Certain Knights who were required by their Order to take stock in a concern in Chicago rebelled and secretly prepared to join the American Federation of Labor. There is nothing to show that they did so, but the bitter feeling engendered and the charges preferred against a member who was alleged to be of this number betrayed a spirit of jealousy and enmity from which one might na- turally infer that the Federation would have had slight scruples in antagonizing a boycott of the Knights such as existed against Rochester clothing after the lockout of 1891. Beside the union of the United Garment Workers, a purely local union was established, while a feeble organi- zation maintained by the Knights still existed. The latter died out and the local union in a few years joined the 57 iS II Oi INDUSTRY AND TRADE UNIONISM United Garment Workers who made such steady pro- gress that by 1903 their membership hst contained the names of between 400 and 500 cutters. Subsequent to 1899 agitation in favor of the union labeF was carried on with vigor by this union as was also an aid poHcy.« In 1900 the Garment Workers had a disagreement with other unionists in the city, in consequence of which the former withdrew from the Central Trades and Labor Council; an action for which the Labor Journal, Feb. 3, 1900, had the following explanation to give : "Commit- tee to visit the Garment Workers and Shoe Workers Unions who had served notice of withdrawal reported that their organization claimed the Assembly was so rotten and contaminated that they were in order to pre- serve the good and welfare of themselves and fellow members compelled to cease affiliating with the nest of unclean birds." Unionism suffers not a little from strife within its own ranks; in this instance, however, the Garment Workers not long after re-established their con- nection with the "unclean birds," although just what manner of regeneration had in the meantime been ex- perienced by the latter is not stated. The union of the local clothing workers had again become very prosper- ous when in 1903 they entered upon the second great crisis of their career as an organized body. Strike of jpoj-^.— After having given previous notice to their employers, four hundred and twenty cutters struck for the eight-hour day on Oct. 2, 1903. The nine- hour day, it will be remembered, had been gained in 1899. Given among the reasons for this demand was the fact of a similar movement throughout the State, coincident ^ See Union Policies— Label Agitation, p. 71 « Ibid., Aid Policy, p. 73. 58 OF AN AMERICAN CITY with the introduction of new cutting machines which reduced the nimiber of working days per year.® The trade-unionists of Chicago took active measures to help the Rochester strikers, instructing retail clerks of the city to cease pushing Rochester clothing, and voting as- sessments amounting to $3,000.00 for aid. By Novem- ber of the same year, $22,000 had been pledged to the assistance of the striking cutters. As usual the strike generated very bad feeling between the contending parties. Mr. Chambers, President of Local Cutters' Union No. 136, was arrested on a charge of grand larceny. Upon his acquittal he commenced ac- tion against Mr. Sole Wile, Secretary of the Clothiers* Exchange, for $50,000.00 damages. Numerous conflicts between individuals took place, resulting in arrests and indictments for assault or incitement to riot, some of which led to conviction on pleas of guilty, involving a striker, in one case, in a fine of $250.00, and, in another instance, a three months' term in the penitentiary. The firm of Rothschild's agreed to the eight-hour day on the following condition: "If within six months the eight-hour day should not be granted also by a majority of the other firms, then the nine-hour day should be re- stored. "At the expiration of the time set the firm re- turned to the nine-hour schedule. The strike was an utter failure. The factories trained apprentices and im- ported help so that by January, 1904, they were operating the cutting departments full-handed. The seventeen) clothing companies which thus again broke the back of unionism in this trade were : Stein-Block Co. Michaels, Stem & Co. » Ibid., Shorter Workday, p. 66. 59 INDUSTRY AND TRADE UNIONISM Garson, Meyer & Co. Adler Bros. Solomon Bros. & Lempert Moore & Biers. Meyer & Simon. A. Dinkelspiel. Block & Co. Hickey Freeman Co. Steefel, Straus & Connor. R. Goldstein. H. A. Hayes. Herman Stem. Holtz & Son. Levy Bros. Rosenberg Bros. o? le i^' n "''\'^^ ""^"^ '" *^'"- Member^ from the Untn '. l^"""" '° --^^'S" ^"""^"y PuTi -Wn ; '^°"^"'l"^""y." as the Labor Journal were obli^Ttot^- "''' "'T """'"^ °^ '"e Union closed shop. '''' ^"^ ""^'"^^-"^ ^ «tri<:tly Prw^n/ Status of Garment Workers' IJninn. a. rr t"^ ^" *"° ""^'^^ Garment Wor^^^^LT^ '^nion, jNo. 14, which was organized in 1910 60 OF AN AMERICAN CITY There is also a third but very small clothing workers' organization among the Lithuanians v^ho work at Gold- water's union factory. The union movement in this industry is now very weak so that the clothing trade may be said to present one of the most conspicuous failures in all Rochester trade-unionism. Constant friction be- tween large German and Jewish elements in the industry, rendering cooperation on the part of these employees very difficult, does not help the situation any. Never- theless the spirit of organization among these workers is not dead and one would not dare to predict what its future may be. When we endeavor to look at these industrial problems from the viewpoint of both the employer and employee and then judge impartially and sympathetically, but with due justice to each, we are forced to the conclusion that the unionist for adherence to his principles has frequently suflFered gross injustice ; on the other hand, the employers' assertion that trade-unionism is often very unfair in its demands and that in the height of its power it has been guilty of rank injustice to its employers, is equally true. The fact is we are all more or less selfish whether em- ployers or employees and, when possessed of power, are in grave danger of exercising it to our own advantage regardless of the rights of the other side. Under our present industrial regime, the employees have rights to protect, rights often best defended by organization ; like- wise, employers have rights, for the maintenance of which corporate cooperation on their part is not to be arbitrarily condemned. 61 CHAPTER III. Union Policies of Garment Workers The general purpose of a union is substantially indicat- ed in the preamble of the old Rochester Cutters' Union of the Knights of Labor: • "The object of this organization shall be for the protection £r.p=; f fa- Ta^of^la- -i't^oC: tt' oTthfS;^f.rLrV" -^ — c Of the Cons^ The purposes of unionism, as set forth by the Ameri- can Federation of Labor, may be enumerated under six general head.ngs: (i) A minimum wage enabling a man to live in conformity to American standards. (2) An eight-hour day. (3) The nonemployment of children .nH r k" T /^^ Legislation safeguarding the lives and limbs of workmen. (5) Compensation for the death or injury of the workman. (6) Improvement in sanitary conditions m factories and in the housing of the work- Forms of Orgam.ation^-Belonging to the Knights of Labor m 1890, there were in Rochester five garment workers unions representing various divisions of the trade, m^., cutters, stockkeepers, shipping clerks, and T^j7''"m'''"''"w ^'^'"'"' °^ ^^"^^^^ ^^^' federations see I r. ^'\T'^- "-'^^ Federations in the United State"' Par; ;. Chapter II m Johns Hopkins Studies in Historical Zd Pol ttcal Science, Ser. XXIV, p. 631. 62 OF AN AMERICAN CITY tailors. These locals were amalgamated with National Trades Assembly, No. 231, which had its headquarters at Chicago and which represented numerous clothing work- ers' unions in various cities. This Assembly was in turn subordinate to the General Assembly of the Knights of Labor, which had under its jurisdiction many other Na- tional Assemblies representing unions in various indus- tries and of various types. Each local elected its own officers ; the National Assembly had an Executive Board whose chairman devoted his time to the management of the locals in its jurisdiction; and the activities of the entire Order were directed by a president^ and other offi- cers elected by representatives from the affiliated bodies. In Rochester the clothing workers' unions of the Knights of Labor were disrupted in 1891 and an entirely new organization entered the city. Local Cutters' Union, No. 136, and Tailors' Union, No. 14, under this new regime are federated with the United Garment Workers of America, a national society of cloth- ing workers, which, in common with state and national organizations of other trades, is one of the parts consti- tuent of the American Federation of Labor. The officers of the American Federation, like those of the national unions, are elected in convention to which the affiliated bodies send representatives. But aside from this mode of representation, the two local unions referred to are at present connected with the American Federation in still another way, viz., through the Rochester Central Trades and Labor Council, which is entitled to a delegate in the annual convention of the Federation, and in which, as a clearing house for the unions of tlie city, each local 2 Called the General Master Workman in the Knights of Labor. 63 I INDUSTRY AND TRADE UNIONISM body may have a stipulated number of representatives • provided the Council sees ht to seat them. The local officers elected by the city unions are: President, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, Guard (for outside pass- word), Gmde (for inside password), and the Executive Board, composed of the four principal officers and three other members, whose duty it is to tend to important matter., of business, and deal with questions demanding immediate attention between regular meetings of the union. Interference of National Officers in Local Matters — The national officials of the Knights of Labor took an active part m local disputes often without regard to the desires of the local unionists and to the great aggrava- tion of employers. An important example of this has been cited.^ Another instance in which a national officer mterfered, this time in a petty local quarrel, occurred in the shop of Max Brickner, a clothing merchant of the city. Mr. Katz, unionist and employee, told a new em- ployee that, unless he joined the union, he could not work there, to which the newcomer replied that he had not money sufficient to meet the expense of joining the union. Mr. Katz, however, caused this man to leave and as a result, Mr. Brickner discharged Mr. Katz for interference in his business. Mr. Thein, a resident of the city, member of the local union, and Vice Chairman of the National Executive Board of Trades Assembly, No. 231, seemed satisfied with Mr. Brickner's explanation that Mr. Katz had exceeded his duty as an officer of the union; but Mr. Hughes of Chicago, Chairman of the Executive Board of Trades Assembly, No. 231, took up the case and wrote Mr. Brickner in threatening language ». See Trade-Unionism in the Clothing Trade, p. 49. 64 OF AN AMERICAN CITY to the effect that Mr. Katz must be re-employed. Mr. Brickner hastened to adjust the matter, but the affair by no means increased his love of the union. Such outside interference involved local unionists in frequent trouble which placed them in a bad light before employers to a degree that might have been avoided. The policy of the national organization with which the Garment Workers are at present affiliated is to inter- fere as little as possible in purely local affairs, but to enforce only such regulations as are necessary for the welfare of the organization nationally. This policy is a marked characteristic of the American Federation of Labor as distinguished from the old policy of interfer- ence of certain branches of the Knights of Labor. Union Rules Standard Wage. — It has always been a rule of the Gar- ment Workers to maintain if possible a standard rate of wages. Among the cutters the standard wage for a nor- mal week's work is $20.00. Those who are unable to earn this amount may be allowed to work, but must be paid for what they do turn out on the basis of the standard rate. Limitation of Amount of Work to Be Done.— Although there was nothing in the Constitution of the Cutters' Union of the Knights to so indicate, they seemed to adhere to a policy of limiting the amount of work to be done in a certain time. Mr. Rothschild, a wholesale clothier, in testifying before the State Board of Media- tion and Arbitration presented instances of such limita- tion among his workmen. The present unions do not have any rule as to such limitation. Each shop has a tacit understanding, how- 65 \: INDUSTRY AND TRADE UNIONISM ever, as to about what amount of work should be done in a given time for a given wage. The logical effect of this policy is to protect the standard rate of wages. Shorter Workday.— In 1899 the Knights agitated for, and gained a nine-hour day. The working day had previously been ten hours. A manufacturer by the name of Jacob A. Britenstol made an attempt to withstand the demand, but when threatened with a boycott yielded to the unionists. In 1903 the cutters instituted a strike for the eight- hour day, after having given previous notice. The eight- hour day had been granted in New York, Utica and Syracuse. Employers in Buffalo had conceded a week of fifty-one hours, and promised one of forty-eight hours when Rochester should obtain the same. Balti- more had made the same concession and the same promise to be fulfilled upon the introduction of the week of forty- eight hours in both Rochester and Buffalo. It was claimed by advocates of the union that the in- troduction of cutting machines had reduced the number of working days per year, thereby necessitating a shorter day to insure steady employment. Also, as the credit for inventing the machine was claimed by labor, it was argued that labor should have a share in the profits accruing therefrom. Although the strike was a failure, a week of forty-eight hours has come to be quite gen- erally enjoyed by the trade. Overtime Work.— The Cutters' Union of the Knights prohibited overtime, or night work, although the em- ployers were willing to pay extra wages and many union- ists would have been glad to have earned them. It was feared that, if overtime work was allowed, it would tend to undermine the standard workday, the destnic- 66 OF AN AMERICAN CITY tion of which would also involve the overthrow of the standard wage rate. This policy was especially exasper- ating to the employers as may be surmised from the fol- lowing statement of Mr. Rothschilds regarding it, in describing a futile attempt to obtain overtime work in his shop: "I went down to see Mr. Archer myself and told him : 'Now I think this is a perfect outrage, here my men are willing to work ... I am willing to pay for it, and your union won't allow it, I think it is arbitrary and ty- rannical.' " The unions at present allow night work at the rate of "one and one-half" which is the rate for all overtime work. Apprenticeship Rules. — The Knights' apprenticeship policy as set forth in the local Cutters' Constitution was as follows: Article IV. Section 1.— Apprentices shall be regulated by the local. Section 2. — The number of apprentices to be taught are one to every shop; two to every twenty journeymen and one to every additional ten journeymen in a shop and are to serve three years until they become competent cutters or trimmers. All cases not in strict accordance with the above shall be left to the discre- tion of the executive board of the local assembly. The wages of the apprentices were to be as follows : First year $3.00 per week Second year 5.00 per week Third year 7.00 per week Difficulties with the employers over these rules were frequent and serious in the few years previous to the lockout of 1891. The history of Mr. Kolb*s case has 67 I INDUSTRY AND TRADE UNIONISM already been recited.* Henry Michaels, wholesale cloth- ier, found himself unable to teach his own son the trade through the operation of these laws. Stein-Block & Co. endeavored to oppose these regulations, but they soon received a letter from the union official, Mr. Hughes, threatening to boycott their goods in a long list of cities specifically named where their customers were located. The threat was executed and immediately Stein-Block & Co. received a letter from a patron in Albany desiring them to settle with the Knights, as this Albany firm did not dare risk buying their goods under a boycott. These boycotts almost invariably succeeded in bringing the em- ployers to time. Abram Adler of Adler Co. and Isaac Wile of Wile, Stem & Co., after refusing to remove certain apprentices, were boycotted and forced to pay $1,000.00 or more each in fines. After the downfall of the Knights in the city, the Unit- ed Garment Workers maintained very similar apprentice- ship rules until the strike of 1903. Since that time the unions have been too weak to enforce such rules. Methods of Rule Enforcement Boycott. — The chief weapon by which the Knights en- forced recognition of their policies by the employers was the boycott. The union had means of finding out who their employers' customers were. Mr. Lewis Steller, a shipping clerk, for Rothschild, Hays & Co., when ques- tioned by the State Board of Mediation and Arbitration in 1891, testified that he had been indirectly asked to furnish a list of customers to the union. Also, Mr. Frederick Thon, stockkeeper for Stein-Block & Co. when « Ibid., p. 49. 66 OF AN AMERICAN CITY asked: "Have you been requested to furnish a list of the customers of the house that you serve?" replied, "I have." When asked, "To whom?", he said, "I think I am now fully able to state that it was given out by the union that we must make up a list of all the customers of our houses and forward them to the union." After thus learning who the customers of their employers were, the Knights would warn them not to patronize a boycotted firm on penalty of losing the trade of labor sympathiz- ers and being themselves boycotted. To accomplish these ends money was not spared. This method of en- forcing their policies was finally declared unlawful and involved the leaders of the union in criminal proceedings for extortion, under which Chairman Hughes, as has elsewhere been stated, was convicted and sentenced to prison for one year. In enforcing their rules against employers, the United Garment Workers resort to the label, the unfair list, and the strike. If an employer refuses to comply with the regulations of a union, he is denied the use of the label without which loyal trade-unionists will not buy his product. Moreover, his firm may be placed upon the unfair list in labor papers, which exhort their readers not to patronize any firm so listed ; but no further steps are taken in the direction of a boycott. These devices at present do not seem to hamper seriously the clothing manufacturers of Rochester, as nearly all local shops are nonunion. In forcing the observance of the union's rules upon their own members, the Knights boycotted any oflFender. The employers were warned not to hire him at the risk of a boycott of their firm until the man in question made his peace with the union. These measures were usually 69 i INDUSTRY AND TRADE UNIONISM very effective. Moreover, the Knights took special pains to disciphne their members if guilty of unreasonable con- duct toward their employer as is set forth by Article VIII in the Constitution of the Cutters' Union: Section 1. — Any member of this assembly who shall wilfully violate his position, namely: when absenting himself from the shop without proper cause when he had ought to be at work and thereby be discharged or censured by his principals, he will not be sustained by this assembly for his action and he must consider that he is doing himself a personal injury. At the present time, although an offender might suffer expulsion from the union for violation of its rules, the organization can do nothing to hinder him from obtain- ing work, since local employers discriminate in favor of nonunionists. It is not the policy of the union to sus- tain any member in unreasonable conduct toward an em- ployer ; but a guilty member, in all probability, would not be censured ; because the union is in too great need of the few members it has to risk offending any. Blacklisting a Position. — Another method of enforcing the union's policies in spite of the opposition of employ- ers is explained in the following section from the Con- stitution before referred to: Article VII. Section 2. — When a member shall be discharged by his employer without a satisfactory cause for his dismissal, no other brother shall be allowed to take his vacancy until satis- factory proof has been given to the executive board. A similar policy would probably not be adhered to now; because, as a cutter said to the writer, the imion would prefer to have one of their number hold the po- 70 OF AN AMERICAN CITY sition even if the employer could not be persuaded to re- employ the discharged unionist. Label.— The label signifies that the goods bearing it have been made under the conditions prescribed by the union, and no employer is allowed the use of it until he has met all such requirements. Those who sympathize with labor are urged by members of the union to pur- chase no goods which do not bear this emblem. In 1898 the local Garment Workers pronounced the Flour City Manufacturing Co. to be the only Rochester establishment selling clothing with the union label. Seem- ingly there had been little or no action previous to this time concerning its use, but a very definite movement was now inaugurated. Firms were investigated as to whether or not they handled union-made clothing bear- ing the label and those not doing so were advertised as unfair. Thus in the Labor Journal, June 3, 1904, ap- peared the following admonition: "Stay away from the Union Clothing Company, Garsons, McFarlins and Strauss Brothers as they don't want your patronage." This agitation has been carried on more or less spasmodi- cally ever since; but it has never attained to a great degree of success in the city. In 1909 it was announced that the McFariin Gothing Company would handle a large line of union-made clothing; but the movement in Rochester is so weak that many stores, which carry few or no labeled goods, are advertised in the Labor Journal It seems somewhat incongruous to read in one section of this paper a request to purchase only union- made goods and then find, on the opposite page possibly, the prominent advertisement of a firm which pays but scant attention to the label. Closed Shop.— The Knights adhered strictly to the 71 I I « INDUSTRY AND TRADE UNIONISM policy of the closed shop. Although they frequently were not able to furnish the employers with all the union help they desired, the employment of nonunionists was not permitted. Thus Adler Brothers and many other firms found themselves unable to fill their orders because nonunion help they could not hire and of more union help they was none. The boycott was again the chief instrument in the enforcement of this policy. The Knights resorted to but few strikes, but maintained a closed shop in almost every factory in the city. Under the United Garment Workers, before the strike in 1903, the principle of the closed shop was tacitly, though not by written agreement, enforced by the Cut- ters* Union and recognized by the employers; but now a member of the union will work wherever he can get a job ; for the clothing makers to-day have but one closed shop in the city, vis., Goldwater's. The local unions are practically powerless to force the closed shop upon un- willing employers. Welfare Features Benefits. — It was the policy of the Knights to pay sick benefits. Subsequent to the disruption of that local organization and previous to the strike in 1903, the United Garment Workers of the city also paid sick and death benefits ; but since the strike the union has been too weak to carry out any beneficiary policies. Labor Bureau. — The cutters who belonged to the Knights of Labor and were out of work procured posi- tions in the manner described in their Constitution : Article V. Section 1. — This assembly shall have a labor bu- reau under the control of the executive board. No person shall make application for work in any shop without permission from 72 OF AN AMERICAN CITY the board and they shall send members in the order in which they applied or had their names registered on the books of the secretary of the labor bureau. Section 2.— Should any firm apply for any particular man, such a man may be sent regardless of what position his name occupies on the book. Section 5.— No member of this assembly shall be permitted to apply for work in any shop unless sent there by the secretary of the labor bureau and no organized shop shall permit any brother of this class to work in their shop unless they have an order from the secretary of the bureau after being notified by the executive board through their shop committee. The United Garment Workers maintained a similar bureau previous to the strike in 1903. Since then the bureau has ceased to exist. Aid Policy.— A voluntary aid policy to help unionists of other trades has been supported by the clothing work- ers of the city. In 1898 they adopted measures to pro- hibit members patronizing nonunion dailies; in 1899 they contributed to the Pennsylvania coal miners, and in 1901 to needy metal polishers in Dayton ; they even threatened members with punishment who patronized a nonunion barber shop. These measiu-es tend to bind organized trades together in common sympathy and reciprocal sup- port. Protection of Public Health.— The policy of the unions is to eliminate as far as possible all conditions of gar- ment making inimical to the health of the ultimate pur- chaser. The following cases will illustrate. In 1905 a special committee investigated and made public imsani- tary conditions in a certain sweatshop. The publicity helped to correct the evil. In 1906 Secretary Bohrer of the Central Trades and Labor Council wrote the Board of Health as follows : "I was instructed to notify you 73 I INDUSTRY AND TRADE UNIONISM of the fact that the parties residing at No. i6, Philander St., had a scarlet fever sign tacked on the house and were at the same time working on clothing on said premises." Needless to say this was speedily attended to. This policy of the unions is of inestimable value to the commimity in general as well as to each one of us in particular when we wear ready-made clothing. to k. fe; ft. o O o to k, O to CO s o O ft, o The average percentage of strikes in the United States (on basis of establishments involved, wholly or partially successful is 63.22% o c G V> Qi •c -4-> w O c u l-l w u o tn .c o o Vt-I o • c Qi O U Qi Failing o o o ^0 NO to o o y-* Succeed- ing wholly or in part o o vO NO o o >o Below average per cent. of success \o NO Above average per cent. of success 8 o o On" This table shows the relation of the per cent, of strikes that are successful to the industrial pros- perity of the times Condi- tion of business Pros- perous o • «-< c Pros- perous en i-i 1889 1890 1892 1894 1899 1903 u 15 \ ft3 s CO o CO CO CO CO k. O Ci I*J '-n f^ tij "-. 2 5 8 •5 ° . c (A 73 (U o > C «* ctJ NO w^ t^ o a 00 • • o t^ c NO lO o ''J' fa §■§ (A l-i o 00 00 «0 sq; ui s9snBo p •4-> C °! u tn OX S o c '3 ^ 8 d 3^ o 4) rt 0) &£< en t^ oj 5Sc o ■t-> &£ o o c o •;3 u w »- (X c o ^ C O O >*- C o «4H c g<. CJ rt a; s c p u o1 .HE c- 2i S- ' x « c 1. . 1 C c . < °l Co j3 15 ^ ^^ CA^ J5 O aS 6 >> c 76 AUTHORITIES CONSULTED !{■' w 1 1 ' .i. Annual Reports of N. Y. State Board of Mediation and Arbitration for the years, 1888-1909. Reports of New York State Department of Labor. Twenty-first Annual Report of the Federal Commis- sioner of Labor, 1906. Federal Report on the condition of "Woman and Child Wage-Earners in the United States." Vol. 2. (Report of Commissioner of Labor on men's ready-made clothing mdustry in the United States, August 8, 1910. Federal Senate Document No. 645 (Sixty-first Congress, Second Session.) Complete Files of the Labor Journal of Rochester. Files of the Rochester Times. Annual Reports of the Rochester Chamber of Com- merce. History of Rochester and Monroe County.— William F. Peck. Rochester, A Story Historical.— J. M. Parker. Rochester Trades Assembly and Building Trades Council. Illustrated History. Article on Rochester Labor.— Paul Moore Strayer, i 78 1r '■:nM. .•■':-'■::. "■■'^r- w \li COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBR. •*~^'- ^ U^ w^ O This book is due on the date Indicated belovB ^^^ — -~ — expiration of a definite period after the date of bo provided by the library rules or by special arrang — _ _...„.,.„,, „. the Librarian In charge. Representative industry and trade unioiiism of an American city DATE •ORROWCO DATS OUC OCT 3 } \W^ -ip. C2a(449)M50 OATK BORROWCO ^^^cX/SS^J OCT 3 1 1949 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITJUBRA^^^^^^ > ■ » 0044255691 P(\^\'^ COC3^> i.v f iS iV«W END OF TITLE