APPEAL ON BEHALF OF Religious Work in the Turkish Empire, FROM REPRESENTATIVES OF BIBLE & MISSIONARY SOCIETIES AT CONSTANTINOPLE. A TENDENCY is plainly evident in some Turkish ofBcial circles to restrict or even to deny the privileges hitherto gratefully enjoyed by Missionaries in the Turkish Empire. Recent orders, apparently intended merely to secure a legitimate supervision of the sale of books, place it in the power of subordinate officials in the Provinces to treat books circulated by the Bible and Missionary Societies as though they had not received official authorization to be published. Notwithstanding that each copy bears on its title page the number and date of the permit for its publication, officials in the Provinces have detained, mutilated or confiscated these 2 books, and arrested their sale in many vexatious ways. A project of law now under consideration at the Sublime Porte, of which a copy is given below, would legalise many of the restrictions from which the Societies have suffered, and so threatens to break up the important business conducted for years by the Bible and Mis- sionary Societies, of selling these authorized books in all parts of Turkey. Of equally grave import is an edict issued during the year i8gi, of which a copy is given later on, which requires Missionaries to refrain from -'transforming" dwelUng houses " into churches or schools," except by authority of an Imperial Firman. This edict may be intended merely for the prevention of the unlawful transfer of dwellings into the category of permanent churches and schools, which by law are freed from taxa- tion. But it is so worded as to be officially interpreted in the sense that Missionaries may not hold worship or conduct school in their houses unless those houses have been permanently set apart for the purpose by Imperial Firman. In this connection, it should be borne in mind that Firmans fix the use of the property for all time, while long experience has shown that the difficulty of obtaining Firmans for churches and schools is such as to amount to a restriction often prohibitive. Under the ancient capitulations, the usage which has fixed their interpretation, and the treaties con- secrating the liberal declarations of religious liberty which have been made by the Sultans of Turkey, the right of Missionaries to exercise their profession in the Empire cannot be called in question. 3 UvSage also shows that their profession has been understood from the first to include the performance of their religious functions in Divine worship, in the instruction of the young and in the care of the sick. The new edict, as commonly understood by the officials severely charged to enforce it, is an innovation which places it in the power of the Turkish authorities to prohibit Missionaries from exercising their vocation in Turkey. It appears under these circumstances to be of great importance to the Bible and Missionary Societies that the home Governments should instruct their Diplomatic and Consular Agents in Turkey to intervene and remon- strate against edicts, laws or decrees which set aside or restrict the long-established rights of these Societies. The right of protection of both the persons and the establishments of Missionaries in Turkey is clearly assigned to the Powers by the 62nd Article of the Treaty of Berlin. The points requiring special attention seem to be the following; — 1. The maintenance of the principle that the Bible and Missionary Societies are entitled under the laws of religious liberty to circulate their books in the Turkish Empire ; and, further, that the^ official authorization granted for the publication of these books constitutes them lawful articles of commerce special restrictions upon the sales of which are in violation of the Treaties. 2. The maintenance of the principle^ that Mis- sionaries in Turkey cannot now be deprived of their immemorial right to exercise in the houses which they 4 own or control, the functions, including the education of the young and the care of the sick, which have been understood and admitted ab antiquo by the Otto- man Government as belonging to the profession of those set apart for the religious life. The necessity as well as the propriety for action in this direction will appear from the following details. For con- venience they are grouped under two heads : "The Restrictions of Religious Work," and " The Rights of Missionaries in Turkey." I. THE RESTRICTIONS OF RELIGIOUS WORK. A. Restrictions on the Circulation of Books. 1. In November, 1890, two boxes of books destined to the city of Bitlis were detained " for examination " by the authori- ties at Erzroum while in transit through that city. They were released, in part, six months later. The books were chiefly Sunday-school lesson books for Bible study, published at the expense of the Religious Tract Society, London, by the American Mission ; they were all officially authorized, and the boxes containing them were sealed with the leaden seal of the Constantinople Custom House to indicate that examination had been made. 2. In 1890 and 1891 the authorities at Erzroum con- fiscated about 500 volumes of officially authorized books, consisting chiefly of the Church Hvmnal and the Bible Dictionary, in Armenian. 3. In December, 1889, a travelling salesman of Bibles and other authorized books, issued by the American Press at Beyrout, was arrested at Dere Zor, in Mesopotamia. Seventy- nine copies of the Bible or its parts, and 179 volumes of other authorized books, were confiscated and publicly burned as " injurious." 4. On the 22nd of January, 1890, six copies of the Bible Dictionary, and 54 copies of the Church Hymnal in Armenian, were seized at the Custom House at Galata " for examination," although officially authorized for publication. On the 7th of February in the same year, 50 copies of the Church Hymnal were taken from boxes passing through this 5 Custom House en route to Teheran, Persia, a place over ship- ments to which the Turkish Government has no jurisdiction. On the i8th and 25th of March in the same year, the same officials seized 140 Scriptures, or parts of Scriptures, 15 Bible Dictionaries, and 255 copies of the Hymnal, from boxes destined to different points in Asiatic Turkey. All of these books, although admittedly authorized for publication, were retained " for examination " more than eighteen months. 5. In March, 1889, a Colporteur selling Bibles in the province of Angora, was arrested, his books seized, and with himself sent to the capital of the province, where he was compelled to wait until orders to release these authorized books could be obtained from Constantinople. 6. In April, i88g, a Colporteur selling Bibles and other authorized books in the province of Aleppo, was arrested, and his books seized, he obtaining release only through Consular interference to demand respect for the authorization of the books. 7. In July, 1889, a Colporteur selling Bibles and other authorized books in the town of Alacham, district of Janik, was compelled by the authorities to discontinue his sales. 8. In October, 1889, the authorities at Erzroum seized a quantity of Bibles while in transit to the Bible Society's depots in the interior of the country, and retained them, notwith- standing the official authorization. g. In October, 1889, the authorities at Salonica obliged a Colporteur to surrender his officially authorized books in order that the provincial Censor might review the judgment of his superiors on their innocuousness. The books, having been released after a week's detention, were offered for sale, upon which the Colporteur was again arrested, and his books once more seized. They were not returned to him for several days. 10. In February, 1890, a Colporteur was arrested in the province of Sivas, and his authorized books were seized. Having been at last released, three weeks later he was again arrested in a neighbouring district, of which the authorities preferred not to recognise the official authorization of the books, nor the second authorization of the Censor of the first district. He was sent three days' journey under guard, as if guilty of selling " injurious " books, and was finally released on bail. 11. In March, 1890, two Colporteurs were arrested in the province of Salonica, and their books seized, although authorized for publication, on the pretence that the provincial authorities alone are competent to authorize books for sale in the province. 6 12. In July, i8go, the book depot of the Bible and Mis- sionary Societies in Marash was closed, and a large number of authorized books were seized by the authorities. At the same time the travelling agent of the American Bible Society was arrested, and his books seized. He was released only on promising not to take the journey to sell Bibles, which he had contemplated. 13. In November, 1890, a Bible Society Colporteur in the province of Broosa was arrested and detained three weeks, on pretence that his licence was not sufficient ; a pretence which was finally set aside by the Sublime Porte. 14. In the same month another Colporteur was arrested, and imprisoned at a town in the province of Adrianople, although his books were all published under official autho- rization. Having been sent as a culprit under guard to Adrianople, he was there released. 15. In i8go and i8gi the authorities at Salonica mutilated by tearing out leaves the Bible Dictionary in Bulgarian, authorized by the Ministry of Public Instruction. 16. In February, 1891, the authorities of Monastir refused to allow the circulation of authorized books except as the provincial censor might see fit to permit. 17. In i8go and 1891, the authorities of Monastir notified the Colporteurs of the British and Foreign Bible Society, and the American Bible Society, that they may sell books in places named in advance only. A list of places having been made out, where the Colporteurs expected to sell books, the Colporteurs were forbidden to visit several of these places. 18. In March, 1891, the authorities at Alacham, district of Janik, forbade the sale of the Bible in that place, although authorized for publication, and arrested the bookseller, sending his books under guard to Samsoun. He himself was imprisoned as a criminal for some time. His books were detained for six months ; some of these Bibles are still in custody, although others were released. ig. In June, i8gi, a Bible Colporteur was arrested in the province of Erzroum, and imprisoned 12 days " for selling injurious books." His Bibles, authorized for publication, were seized and held for six weeks. 20. In August, 1891, a Colporteur in the province of Adrianople, was deprived of his books, all being duly authorized, which were held " for examination " during several days. 21. In November, i8gi, another Colporteur in the province of Adrianople, was deprived of his books which have notyetbeenrestoredtohim. All were authorized for publication. 7 22. In November, 1891, the authorities of Trebizond pro- hibited the Colporteurs of the American Bible Society from selling Bibles in the villages of the province, or in the streets of the city. 23. In November, 1891, the authorities at Samsoun pro- hibited sales by Colporteurs in that place and in the surrounding villages. 24. In November, 1891, the authorities at Adana arrested the Superintendent of Sales of the American Bible Society while travelling to sell authorized books. At the same time 66 Bibles were seized from the book shop in Adana. 25. In November, 1891, a Bible Colporteur was arrested, and his books seized at Geordes. He is still held on bail while the authorities are examining the Bibles to see if they are " injurious." 26. In September, 1891, the authorities at Erzroum seized from boxes in transit through that city, destined to Bitlis, 151 volumes of authorized books. 27. In December, i89i,the authorities at Adana informed the American Bible Society's agent there that they will no longer recognise the authorization for publication as sufficient, but must decide for themselves what books are injurious. 28. In the course of 1891 the Ministry of Public Instruction at Constantinople has forbidden the publication of the Scrip- tures in the Albanian language, stopping this enterprise of the British and Foreign Bible Society, although the Bible has been authorized to be printed in all languages in Turkey. 29. In December, 1891, the authorities of Erzroum detained the Turkish Lexicon of Sir James Redhouse, pub- lished by the American Mission at Constantinople with the authorization of the Ministry of Public Instruction. After holding the book for two weeks they defaced it by blotting out with ink the Turkish word signifying Armenia. 30. In November, i89i,the authorities at Dede Aghaj, near the Dardanelles, seized a Bible from the hands of a traveller, notwithstanding the record of official authorization. They sent the volume " for examination" to Adrianople, ^nd gave the owner the choice between losing the book entirely, waiting a week or two for a verdict from the Governor-General, of going himself to Adrianople (100 miles distant) whence he had just come with the book. The practice of seizing books from the hands of travellers is of almost daily occurrence, in many places the owner of the book being held under bail until a judgment can be had from the capital of the province, whether the book is a fit one for him to read. 8 The frequency of these interferences with a lawful trade of more than sixty years standing, is sometimes explained by small officials who declare their opinion that all Christian books are dangerous. The following translation of the project of law relating to the Colportage of authorized books, which is now under consideration of the Sublime Porte, offers much ground for such an opinion. Art. III. makes the licence to sell books, unlike that for any other trade, obtainable only by petition to the highest authority of the province. Moreover, it provides that a foreigner must give up his national rights before he can engage in such a trade. Art. VI. makes it perilous for anyone to offer books for sale on faith of the official authorization, for it permits officials to punish men for selhng books which the officials deem injurious, without regard to the authorization. Art. IX., by giving all officials the right to prohibit book sales in their districts without assigned reason, cannot but suggest to the official that there must be something about the use of books which is inherently dangerous. The proposed law offers to the Societies, which have invested large capital in the lav/ful business of publishing the books, ground for the strongest protests against such needless precautions to hamper the sales of works, of whose innocuous character the Government satisfies itself before authorization to publish. 31. — Translation of the Projected Law on Book Colportage. " Art. I. Those who sell in the streets or other places books or tracts of any description, or pictures or photographs, or any printed or written papers, excepting newspapers, by carrying them or placing them on some means of conveyance, or by spreading them out on temporary exhibition, are called book-hawkers (Colporteurs). "Art. II. Book-hawkers are required to obtain a licence, in the capital from the Prefecture of the city, and in the provinces from the Municipality. 9 " Art. III. In order to obtain a licence, those who wish to become book-hawkers are required to draw up a petition containing name, title or profession, age, residence, nationality, and the names of the places where it is proposed to carry- about (books), as well as the promise not to sell books, tracts or other papers or pictures or photographs which are opposed to the public peace, to morals, or to the religious sects. To this is to be attached a testimonial from some honourable quarter as to the good repute of the applicant. This petition is to be presented in Constantinople or its dependencies to the Prefect of the city, and in the provinces to the Governor- General of the Vilayet ; or, in those districts which are separately administered, to the Governor of the District. In case the petitioner is a foreigner, he is required to add to his petition and his testimonial a bond certified by the Embassy of the Government of his ahegiance, whereby he agrees to be treated as an Ottoman subject. " Art. IV. These who have not entirely fulfilled the con- ditions laid down in Art. III. will not be given licences for Colportage. " Art. V. If Colporteurs shall call out the books which they sell by any words, aside from the title, which suggest the contents of the books, their licences are to be given up, and they them- selves are to be fined in accordance with Art. 254 of the Penal Code. "Art VI. Book-hawkers who knowingly seU any kind of pernicious or immoral books, tracts, pictures, photo- graphs, or other papers, either openly or secretly, are regarded as accessories in crime with the authors or printers, and besides suffering the treatment prescribed by law, they will be restrained from exercising their calling for from one to three rr.onths. "Art. VII. The force of the licence is limited to the time specified in it, and if the books and tracts relate to religious matters they are not to be sold in the vicinity of any place of worship. " Art. VIII. Those who sell books, tracts, pictures, photo- graphs, or other papers printed or prepared without permission, or imported from abroad, and those who engage in book- hawking without obtaining an offiicial licence, are fined from three to ten Turkish pounds. "Art. IX. It is in the hands of the Government to prevent the purchase and sale of books, tracts, and other papers, whose printing and publication rests on an official authorization, when their circulation in some places is thought 10 to be harmful for the time being. Booksellers selling such books within the prohibited districts give up their licence, and are punished in conformity with Art. VIII. " Art. X. The term of validity of the licence and the course to be pursued in regard to its being limited to the owner, conforms to the system in vogue with regard to trade licenses. " Art. XI. Book-hawkers ai^e subjected to the inspection of the officers of the Ministry of Public Instruction, of the Municipality and of the police. "Art. XII. The Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Public Instruction are charged with the execution of this law." B. — Restrictions on the Exercise of the Missionary Profession. 1. The following is a tfanslation of the essential parts of a Note communicating to the Foreign Diplomatic representatives in Constantinople the decree in reference to the "transformation" of dwelling-houses into "churches or schools." The Note is dated at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Aug. 17, 1891. " It occurs sometimes that Missionaries or Religieux trans- form in an irregular manner into churches or schools, buildings which they construct or buy as private houses. In order to stop this abuse it has been decided that hereafter the buildings which have undergone such a transformation without authori- zation by Imperial Firman, will be restored to their primitive purpose. Instructions in this sense having been given to the competent authorities, the Minister of Foreign Affairs begs . . . . to be kind enough on its part to inform those who are concerned." 2. The following is a translation of an order sent early in 1891 by the Sublime Porte to the Governors of Provinces upon this subject : — " While it is prohibited to construct such estabhshments as churches and schools without superior authority, it has been the custom in many places to establish such institutions and afterwards to ask the Imperial Government to kindly grant permits for them, and this privilege has been put to a bad use. Since the prohibition is unquestioned, and the necessity for enforcing it is evident, by decision of the Council of State, approved by decree of His Imperial Majesty, hereafter, any official who allows the making of churches and schools, and such like, without permission, will be brought to judgment." II Neither of these two documents shew precisely what is the object aimed at.* The natural answer of a Missionary to a charge of having illegally transformed his house into a church or school, is that it has undergone no such transformation, and pays as a dwelling-house the taxes laid upon it. But the average provincial official, informed that he is to be brought to judgment if he allows an undefined something in regard to schools and churches, deems it safest to stop Divine worship and close schools held in buildings which have not an Imperial Firman. In this sense, it has been learned, the decree is interpreted by many officials in Government Bureaux in Constantinople. Interpreted in this way, the order implies the prohibition of any new Missionary operations in Turkey, and perhaps even the closing of long-established undertakings, unless the Missionary can induce the Sultan to protect him by a Firman. 3. The following are instances where this interpretation has been given to this decree by provincial officiah : — {a.) The Governor-General of Van having closed an American mission-school at the village of Agantz, was directed to allow it to be reopened under the terms of the agreement by which American schools of long standing are not to be closed on the sole ground of a lack of a formal permit. On the appearance of the above order the Governor-General promptly closed the school again, declaring the meaning of the order to be that no Christian school in the smallest village can be carried on without special Imperial Firman. (6.) In October, 1891, the Governor-General of Adana notified the American Missionaries, in that province, that all of their schools will be closed, unless, within three months, they obtain an Imperial Firman authorizing the continuance of each one. (c.) About the same time the authorities in Antioch served a notice of similar tenor upon the Missionaries of the Irish Presbyterian Church in that city. {d.) In August of 1891, the Governor of Herek, in the province of Sivas, closed and sealed up the Protestant chapel in that place, and forbade meeting for worship in any other room, saying, "Any and every place where Christians meet for * See, however, Postcript on page ig. X2 prayer is a church, and must have an Imperial Firman before worship can be held." {e.) An American Missionary at Bourdour, in the province of Iconium, bought a piece cf land, and, obtaining the usual municipal permit, commenced to build himself a house. In October, 1891, just as the roof was about to be tiled, the Governor of the district stopped the work, and refused to allow the roof to be completed unless the owner would sign a bond to the effect that Divine worship should not be statedly held in the building, nor a school opened there. These examples suffice to show the danger threatening all Missionary institutions in Turkey, if the interpretation of these officials is to become general. In many towns are tem- porary residents in small numbers who desire to meet for worship. In others, the native Protestant Community is too poor to build church or school-house. Whether Missionaries would offer to such a place of meeting, or whether the people would meet for prayer in one of their own houses, according to the interpretation put upon this decree, they may not meet anywhere unless they can devote property to the construction of a church and have it set apart by Firman. But if worship in places which have not a Firman is to be prohibited, perhaps it may be supposed that a Firman can be easily obtained. On the contrary, if a Missionary applies for a Firman he is often denied it on the ground that there are none of his nation living in the place where he would build a church or school. If a small group of native Protestants ask it, they are in a fair way to be told that being few in number they do not need a church or school. In the most favorable circumstances a Firman for a Christian church or school in Turkey cannot be expected to issue in less time than one year from the date of application. 4. The following; are the ordinary conditions required by Turkish regulations to be fulfilled before a Firman can be issued for a Christian Church or school building : — I. The owner of the property must consent to dedicate it inalienably to the purpose specified. 13 II. The land must be free from Mortmain lien (vakouf) to any Mohammedan sanctuary, or, in view of the rarity in cities of unencumbered land, the lien must be transformed into a perpetual ground- rent of one per cent, per annum of the actual value of the land and its buildings. This transformation into ground-rent requires a special and separate authorization from the Sultan. III. The parties applying for church or school must show that they have a proper number of families living in the district. IV. The parties applying must show that they have money to build, and must explain how they became possessed of this money. V. The plan of the building must be approved by the Municipality. VI. An official plan of the land and its surroundings must be made by the local city engineers to go with the application. yil. The application for the Firman must be approved in writing by the following : — (a.) The neighbours of all sects. (b.) The nearest Muslim notables. (c.) The Municipality, which must also certify that the site is not in a Mohammedan quarter, and is not " near " a mosque. (d.) The Governor of the Province and his Council. (e.) The Minister of the Interior (provisionally). (/.) The Grand Vezir (provisionally). ig.) The Court of Supervision of Mortmain Trusts, which has to give judgment in regular form in favour of the arrange- ment proposed. (A.) The Minister of the Evkaf (Mortmain Trusts) and his Council. (j.) If the application is for a school, the Minister of Public Instruction and his Council. If it is for a church, the Minister of Justice and Public Worship and his Council. {k.) The Grand Vezir (again provisionally). (l.) The Council of State. (;«) The Council of Ministers. (n.) His Imperial Majesty. Failure to secure the approval of any one of the above series stops all proceedings, save for such as have direct access to the ear of the Sovereign. A single notable in the town where the church or school is to be built, can often prevent its construction bya black-ball vote. The application of the Armenian Protestants of Constantinople for a Firman to build a church has been detained ten years in its 'earliest stages — by certain local men of influence, who wrongly certify, now that it is in a Mohamme- dan quarter, now that it is " near " a Mosque, and now that there are no Protestants in the quarter where 40 or 50 Protestant families are almost heart-broken over the opposition to their having a Church. Enough has been said to show that application for an Imperial Firman does not offer a means of escape from the hardships of a decree understood to mean that Missionaries may not exercise their profession in the houses which they inhabit. II. THE RIGHTS OF MISSIONARIES IN TURKEY. A.— The Right to Circulate Books. No argument is required to show that after the sovereign right of the Ruler of the Empire to decide what may and what - may not be published in his domains has been exercised, and respect for the laws of religious liberty has led to the issue of permits to print the Bible and other religious books, justice requires that this authorization should not be nullified by restrictive orders given to the officials who supervise the operations of the book agents. After a Society established in Turkey has incurred the expense of printing a book on faith of the permit to print it, the principles of the Commercial Treaties ought to protect the Society in its freedom to sell its ware under the authorization which has made them lawful merchandise. Reference to the list given above of expensive and vexatious interferences in the book trade of the Societies, will sufficiently show the bearing of this remark. It is worthy of note, however, that the perpetual examinations and re-exami- nations of authorized and well-known books, which are a chief obstacle to success in the book trade in Turkey are contrary to 15 law. The following decree, exempting authorized books from detention for examination, is published in the official collection of the laws of the Ottoman Empire (Dustur) : — " Although it was formerly ordered that books published in the Empire, or imported from abroad, should be examined by Custom House officials, and those deemed injurious seized, yet, since the treatment like those published abroad, of books published within the Empire, and transported from one place to another in Turkey, has been found to hinder the desired development of the art of printing, and since no books can be published in the Empire without first obtaining a permit for the same, after examination of their contents, the fact that books have been published by permission will be regarded as sufficient, only books imported from abroad being examined at the Custom House." — 5 Sefer, 1293 (1876). B. — The General Right of Missionaries to Exercise THEIR Profession in Turkey. The following documents show that Missionaries have a right, fortified by what amounts to an international agreement, to exercise freely their profession in the Turkish Empire in places which they inhabit or control. I. Translation of an Extract from the French Capitulations of 1740. "Art. 82 The Bishops and members of the religious orders under the French Emperor who are in my Empire, shall be protected so long as they keep within the limits of their calling, and no one shall prevent them from exercising their rights according to their custom, in the churches which are in their hands, as well as in the other places which they inhabit, and when our tributary (non- Muslim) subjects and the French go and come between their respective residences for sales, purchases or other business, they shall not be molested, contrary to law, on account of these visits " 2. Extract from the British Capitulation of 1809. " Art. 18. That all capitulations and privileges granted to to the Venetian, French, and other princes who are in amity with the Sublime Porte, having been in like manner through i6 favor granted to the English by virtue of our special command, the same shall be always observed according to the form and tenor thereof, so that no one in the future do presume to violate the same or act in contravention thereof." 3. Extract from the Treaty of Berlin, 1878. " Art. 62 The freedom and outward exercise of all forms of worship are assured to all, and no hinderance shall be offered either to the hierarchical organisation of the various communions, or their relations to their spiritual chiefs. " Ecclesiastics, pilgrims and monks of ah nationalities tra- velling in Turkey in Europe or in Turkey in Asia, shall enjoy the same rights, advantages and privileges. "The right of official protection by the Diplomatic and Consular Agents of the Powers is recognised, both as regards the above-mentioned persons and their religious, charitable and other establishments in the holy places and elsewhere." 4. The attitude of the U nited States on this subject. This is shown by the following extracts from a despatch of Mr. Bayard, Secretary of State of the United States of America, to Mr. Straus, U.S. Minister at Constantinople, dated April 20, 1887, and published in the volume for 1887 of " The Foreign Relations of the United States ": — " _ • • ■ • The construction given by Turkey to these treaties, and especially to the capitulations to Great Britain, quoted above is evidenced by her continued protection of the American Missions in Turkey, with their hospitals and schools, m which Turkish patients are received and Turkish children instructed .... The protection by Turkev of the schools established by other religious communions on Turkish soil, a protection which has existed from a time coincident with the establishment of such schools, shows that Turkey has regarded them as among the incidents of the terri- torial rights assigned by the capitulations to those religious communions. ^Ve have, therefore, in this protection not only a contemporaneous construction of the Turkish capitulations, treaties, and edicts, but a construction so continuous that it has the force of settled law .... " From what has been said it will be seen, therefore, that the right of Protestant citizens of the United States to conduct their various missions, chapels, hospitals, and schools, in the way they have been heretofore conducted, rests on the privi- leges of extra-territoriality granted to Christian foreigners in Turkey, as expanded in the present case by usage established 17 in Turkey so as to enable persons of Turkish nationality to be received in such hospitals and schools. " So far as concerns the right of Americans, whatever be their religious faith, to protection in the exercise of that faith, the right rests on the concessions of extra-territoriality above stated. So far as it concerns their right to receive in their hospitals and schools (otherwise than as servants) persons of Turkish nationality, it rests on usage amounting from duration, and the incidents assigned to it by law, to a Charter." 5. The conformity of this view with that of the Ottoman Government in the past as to the right of Missionaries freely to exercise their profession in Turkey, is seen from the following : — In 1867, Fuad Pasha, then Minister of Foreign Affairs, sent to the Turkish representatives in Europe a circular on the progress made by the Ottoman Government in giving effect to the Hatti Humayoun of 1856. The chmax of his claim in regard to the completeness of religious liberty in Turkey, is in these pregnant words : — " Not only no Christian or other non-Muslim is or has been constrained to accept Islamism, but the notion of Mohammedan proselytism is unknown in the Ottoman Empire, so that it may be claimed with truth, in respect to religious propaganda, that none exists in Turkey save that which the various Christian sects carry on with a freedom which has no limits but the absolute necessities of pubhc order." 6. Note on the usage of the past in regard to the freedom of Missionaries to preach and to teach in Turkey : — " Usage alone establishes a right, but it also serves to show the interpretation put upon treaties in cases where a new inter- pretation is proposed." (a.) The usage of the past shows that the Ottoman Govern- ment has hitherto interpreted the treaties as conferring upon Missionaries the right of holding religious worship according to the custom of their communion in their private houses. During sixty years American Missionaries have enjoyed this right unquestioned in all parts of Turkey. It has always been conceded that they are entitled to enjoy the rights conferred on the French clergy by the Treaty of 1740 and hence that no i8 Ottoman official may call in question the act of the Missionary in holding Divine worship in houses which he owns or controls, or in admitting to such worship such of the people of the country as choose to attend. (b.) The usage of the past shows that the Turkish Govern- ment has formerly and continuously interpreted the capitula- tions as conferring on Missionaries the right to open and carry on schools. It has not only not interfered with such schools in their establishment and continuance to the present period, but it has repeatedly intervened to protect them against unlawful aggression on the part of ill-disposed persons. Moreover, in the Decree of 1864 concerning the Custom House franchise accorded to religious bodies and their establishments of benevo- lence, the Ottoman Government has made formal definition of what these establishments are understood to comprise. It recites for the information of all concerned (Art 3), that " Since, to the convents named in Art. 2. {i.e., of all religious orders in Turkey) there are or may be attached, either in whole or in part, seminaries, and establishments or works of benevolence, such as hospitals, dispensaries for the care of needy and indigent sick, orphanages, free hoarding and day schools for the in- struction of poor children, and hospices, the Custom House will accord to these seminaries, and to each of these works of benevolence, the annual allowance of franchise, which will be distinct, be it well understood, from that given to the persons belonging to the convent." There is no hint here of authorizations or Firmans for these schools, and at the time of the issue of this decree the demand for such had never been made. The decree provides that new schools are entered on the list for enjoyment of the franchise upon a Consular certificate to the fact of their existence. And to-day the Consular certificate is still the document which compels the Administration of the Custom Houses to enter new schools upon the free list. This shows conclusively that Missionaries were held, as religious bodies in Turkey have always been held, to be by reason of their religious vocation engaged in teaching the young in schools forming a part of the establishments where they are free to exercise their profession. 19 But no room remains for denial of the interpretation to be put upon the usage of the past, in respect to the Hberty to estabHsh schools, after perusal of the following : — 7. Extract from the Haiti Hiimayoun, noted in the Treaty of Paris as an obligation voluntarily assumed by Turkey toward all of the powers. " Moreover, each Community is authorized (Turkish mezun) to establish its own schools of science, of art, and of industry, only the method of instruction and the choice of teachers in this class of Public Schools being under the supervision and inspection of a mixed Council of Instruction, whose members will be appointed by ourself." The conclusion from the examination of these documents can hardly be other than that the right of Missionaries to exercise their profession in Turkey is incontestable. In fact, every examination of the subject only emphasizes the greatness of the innovation which proposes that the Missionary may neither hold worship nor open schools until he has fulfilled the cumbersome formalities connected with securing a Firman of authorization from the Sovereign himself. POSTSCRIPT. Since the above was in type the following order, issued by the Sublime Porte explains fully the attitude toward freedom of worship and freedom of education, which has been adopted by the Ottoman Government. Translation of General Order of January, 1892. " The prohibition against founding or opening, in the Ottoman Empire, schools or places of worship without obtain- ing official permission is reiterated. Moreover, peremptory in- structions should be given to those concerned, that in respect to schools and places of worship, which have been opened without official permission, it will be necessary for them, within 20 a period fixed according to the locality, to obtain, by the usual method, permits for these also, and, further, that those schools and places of worship which do not obtain permits will be closed at the expiration of the specified time. It must also be made known to them that those who found schools or places of worship without permission will be treated according to provisions of Art. 129 of the Law of Public Instruction, and to the present edict. The decision upon these points of the High Council of Ministers having received by Irade the sanction of His Imperial Majesty, the orders for its execution have been given."