.JKEN3QS INAUGURAL DISSERTATION ... DYSENTERY M-fclAS Q2 Columbia IBntoergitp intljeCttpoflrtngork College of iPfjpgtctang ano gmrgeona Hifcrarp Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Open Knowledge Commons http://www.archive.org/details/inauguraldissertOOquac AN INAUGURAL DISSERTATION, IN WHICH, BY AN INDUCTION OF FACTS FROM DYSENTERY, THE MITCHILLIAN DOCTRINE OF PESTILENTIAL FLUIDS IS ILLUSTRATED. SUBMITTED TO THE PUBLIC EXAMINATION OF THE FACULTY OF PHYSIC fcNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE, IN THE STATE OF NEW-YORK, The Right Rev. BENJAMIN MOORE, D.D. President; FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHYSIC, On the 9lh Day of November, 1802. BY NICHOLAS I. QUACKENBOS, A.B. Citizen of the State of New- York. - NEW-YORK.- Primed by T. & J. StlroRD , Printer! to the Faculty of Physic ot C'olumlii.i L'ollcgc. 1802. y&£r(JSH ? ~dM TO JOHN R. B. RODGERS, M.D. Professor of Obstetrics and Clinical Medicine in Columbia College $ / AND SAMUEL L. MITCHILL, M.D. F.R.S.E. Gentlemen, IN the dedications of books, so much adulation has been frequently poured forth to the patrons of authors, as to have thrown the practice, in a great measure, into disrepute. When a young writer, however, in his first attempt to at- tract public notice, acknowledges the immense obligations he lies under to that gentleman who has, with unremitted assiduity, conducted him in the pursuit of professional know- ledge; and when he expresses his gratitude to another, whose name is deservedly famous in the republic of letters, for his polite condescension and friendly assistance, while engaged in the prosecution of his studies ; a dedication, in such a case, will be universally allowed to be proper, as silence would be culpable; and the highest expressions of esteem and respect can be only considered as the effusions of a grateful mind. Impressed, therefore, with such sentiments, the author conceives it a tribute no less due to superior merit, than to principles of the purest gratitude and warmest affection, to itc this treatise to you, to whom he sincerely wishes B long and successful continuation of your truly valuable labours, AN INAUGURAL DISSERTATION ON DYSENTERY. CHAP. I. LITERARY AND PHILOLOGICAL REMARKS. XIl GREAT controversy exists among Phy- sicians concerning the true meaning of the words Contagion and Infection. Some have considered them as synonymous, and others have contended that they signify things of a very different nature. It does not, per- haps, become one just entering into the pro- le --ion to decide on this point, upon which men of bigh character and eminence have differed so widely: yet 1 cannot suppress a belief that the two words did originally denote ideas very unlike each other, and ( ? ) that at this time they ought not to be con- founded. There is scarcely an instance of two words in the English, Latin, or any other language, possessing the same critical meaning. Though in common speech, they may be employed as convertible terms; yet they are always found, on nice examination, to have a plain and sensible difference. The books of rhetoric and belles lettres inform us wherein " pride" differs from "vanity;" how " fatigue" is dis* tinguished from "uneasiness;" and by what means " delight" varies from " pleasure;" with hundreds of other examples of the kind. These, though in common acceptation, re- puted to be synonymous words, are in reality very far from each other in true significa^ tion. What happens in the language of common life occurs also in the dialect of medicine. Words reputed by many to be quite alike, are known by the correct and learned to intend things widely remote in their meaning. Thus " Lues," " Pestis," " Contagium," and " In* fectio," have been supposed by many as words of signification so nearly alike, that ( 7 ) in glossaries and lexicons they have been employed familiarly one instead of the other. But I shall endeavour to show that this is a mistake. 1. " Lues" seems to be derived from luo, to pay the cost, make atonement, or suffer punish- vient for a crime or fault. Hence lucre peenas signifies to suffer the penalty for an omission or breach of duty. And, for the same reason, " lues" is employed to mean any distemper brought on through or by a violation of moral obligation: particularly it applies to the dis- ease consequent upon scortatory love, which has been termed emphatically " Lues Vene- rea," the malady incident to prostituted em- braces. Such is the literal and original mean- ing of the word ; but like other words, it ac- quired afterwards a greater latitude of signifi- cation. Thus Claud ian the poet writes, " Hinc hominum, pecudumque lues, hinc pestifer acr ;" alluding to the sufferings of men and cattle; and Virgil goes a step further, and extends the idea to trees and corn: " Ai boi iUr/jue MLttsque iucs, et kthifcr annus.'* tl ( 8 ) 2. Whether " Pestis" is derived front! pereo," to perish or to die; or comes from* the Hebrew " paschat," importing to spoil or pillage, seems not necessary now to be dis- puted.* It is sufficient for the present pur- * Since the above was written I have been favoured with a letter from the Rev. J. C. Kunze, S. T. D. on the etymo- logy of this important word. The remarks of this gentle* man, so well known for his biblical ar^d oriental erudition, are so valuable that I insert them entire. " New-Tork, October 13, 1802. « Dear Sir, " Accept iny hearty thanks for the permission of perusing your Inaugural Dissertation on Dysentery in manuscript^ which I herewith return. " The derivation of the word pestis, from the Hebrew uiz/3, may be a just one, as the word is used for undressing, Lev* vi. 4. Cant. v. 3. with which the Hebrews always connect the idea of weakening. From Judges xi. 33. it appears, like- wise, that that verb has the signification of rushing upon somebody in order to destroy him. In the most places it occurs for plundering ; as 2 Sam. xxiii. 10. Nahurr iii. 16* it is applied to the mischiefs of the canker-worm. " It seems, however, more probable to me, that the word arose from another verb, rr nefit will/ I presume^ be derived from this mode of treatment. On trials with carbonate of magnesia, it appears to be not sufficiently strong and effi- cacious. Its powers are greatly inferior to carbonate of pot-ash. Though its qualities are good as far as they go, yet they are, how- ever, too feeble to be relied on in eases where decisive and energetic practice is required. The disagreeable taste of pot-ash is some- times objected to by patients. When this happens, carbonate of soda may be employed. This is much less unpleasant, and may be tasted and swallowed with ease : indeed, on reflecting that soda is the basis of the bile, and of the culinary salt, which we constantly and by instinct as it were, swallow with our food, it appears to be more natural and friendly to the constitution than either pot-ash or mag- nesia ; and for this reason it is that neutral salts, with a basis of soda, are preferable to all others, for their efficacious, safe and kind operation. The bringing them more gene j rally into use would be a great improvement in the practice of physic. ( 35 } The formula of giving carbonate of soda in dysenteric cases is, a solution in water strong enough to be taken into the mouth and su> mach without smarting, or any other incon- venience. The dose is from a tea spoonful to two or three table spoonsful; and the times of administration are every quarter or half hour, or every second and third hour, as the symptoms seem to require. Portions of the same solution are applied in the form of glister, to be retained ; and they are very useful and efficacious in allaying tenesmus, and diminishing the frequency of evacuar '{ions. I have seen several cases of dysentery cured with this plain prescription in the tttm modes just mentioned. Sometimes, however, the carbonate of soda may be dissolved in mint-water, instead of common water: and occasionally the addi- tion of some laudanum, where the patient suffers much pain, lias bad a happy effect. I think whore alkalies are prescribed there need be Less hesitation to administer opiates than in conjunction with any oilier remedy. f ol. ricirri, or of ol. olivarum, may a tonally interposed with advantage, as. ( 36 ) mild oils have a tendency to obtund the acid exciting cause of the malady. The same quality probably belongs to all fat and greasy substances that are not rancid. On the con- trary, lean meats are found universally bad for dysenteric patients, who ought always to be interdicted their use, I have known a convalescent relapse into dysentery after eat- ing a dinner of beef. For food we would re- commend rice, tapioca, sago, panada, and ge- nerally farinaceous and saccharine substances; and likewise soups and jellies, if the sick have an inclination for them. In all these kinds of food an advantage would be derived from sprinkling in as much muriate of soda as can be conveniently and agreeably done. By these means the alimentary canal can in general be sufficiently alkalized. We al- kalize our clothes and the outer surface of our bodies with solutions of soap and weak leys, to keep ourselves clean and healthy. The intestines are alkalized by the bile, and their internal surface is protected by the mediation of that admirable liquid, which is prepared and applied without our knowledge or con^ ( 37 ) currence, by the most excellent provision in the animal economy. When the gall is in- sufficient, it becomes the physician to alka- lize the intestines and their contents, by some- thing as nearly allied to the bile as he can find. Soda is such a substance. Perhaps camomile, gentian, or some other bitter, would improve it, by making it resemble the natu- ral secretion more nearly. The carbonates of pot-ash and soda seem to be better in dysentery than the combina- tion of those simple salts with stronger acids. They arc more easily decompounded, and while the septic acid of the intestines joins the alkalies, to form septitcs of pot-ash and soda, the carbonic acfd is extricated to pro- duce the agreeable effect of which it is sup- posed capable, and for which it has been long celebrated. But it ought to be remembered that tbe tart rites of pot-ash (soluble tartar), and of soda (Rochelle salt), and phosphate of soda are very valuable remedies. And to these \m may add muriate of soda, by which is meant the compound formed by mere tnuri* acid unci goda, and not the adulterated and heterogeneous composition forming the ( 38 ) sea-salt commonly in use. No objection ought to arise against the use of these alkaline remedies, in ordinary cases, as being too fiery and pungent; nor even in cases of inflamma- tion and ulceration of the intestines: for it is shown, in a memoir in the Medical Repo- sitory, by Dr. Mitchill, that carbonates of pot- ash and soda are very substantial helps to the surgeon, when applied to the surface of foul and eroding ulcers. And from their internal use, another good effect will ensue: the fasces will possess very little fastor, and no infection, Nurses and attendants may perform their ser- vices commodiously, and without hazard of catching the distemper. Under the use of these remedies it can never spread. Alkaline remedies, excellent as they are, may be abused ; and for want of proper care 'in their administration and continuance the customary good effects may not be produced by them *. but they can do a great deal; for they can overcome the acid exciting cause of the dysentery, and prevent its further mischievous operation upon the intestines, and its absorption into the system. They may do all this, and yet not be capable of curing every case that presents. ( ™ ) Inveterate dysenteries and fluxes will often baffle medical skill, and end fatally, in oppo- sition to alkaline and all other remedies. After the stomach has lost, in a considerable degree, its power to digest, the liver to fur- nish bile, the lacteals to imbibe their appro- priate fluid, and the intestines to perform their peristaltic movements, there is no great prospect of recovery, even though the excit- ing cause of the malady should have been entirely expelled from the body. Still it ap- pears, from repeated trials and careful obser- vation, that the alkaline plan of treatment which we have described, is preferable to every other. Rhubarb, ipecacuanha, cerated glass of antimony, calomel, and Peruvian bark, seem to be very inferior remedies. None of them promise to do much good, fur- ther than as they operate as cathartics. And for a purgative purpose, the neutral salts which we have enumerated possess a decided superiority. THE END, Date Due 9 QuaeW Inaugu] terv 3.7 sen-