SPEECH OF THE REV. DR. DUFF, AT THE ANNIVERSARY OF THE reft of gbtcilanfr’s jfom'p Jflfeston#, EXETER HALL, MAY 8, 1837. LONDON: GEORGE BERGER, HOLYWELL STREET, STRAND. Price Twopence. SPEECH. The Reverend Gentleman, in rising to propose the third Resolution, was received by the audience with loud cheers. First of all he proceeded at some length to detail, on the authority of a recent Government Report, some of the cruelties of Indian superstition. He significantly pointed to the preaching of the everlasting Gospel, as the primary in¬ strument to be employed in regenerating a guilty world; adding that for India not sixty or a hundred, but sixty or a hundred thousand teachers and preachers were wanted, and that in order to raise such a number, Christian schools and colleges are begun to be established. He emphatically pro¬ claimed our simple, absolute dependence on the influences of the Holy Spirit to render all the instituted means of grace efficacious. He illustrated the potency of sound, useful knowledge in demolishing the systems of Hinduism, and pointed out the necessity of supplying the higher knowledge of Christianity. To prevent mistakes, he endeavoured to show how the two kinds of knowledge ought ever to be combined. Most true it is, said he, that I for one have advocated with all the strenuousness of which my nature is capable, the in¬ troduction into India of the largest range of sound European knowledge in every imaginable department, and that too for reasons which in this very hall I formerly stated at large, and which have proved more than satisfying to all really en¬ lightened and reflecting minds, but which on that very account it is wholly unnecessary for the present to recapitu¬ late. Be it remembered, however, that in order to secure all the great and important uses and advantages of knowledge, apart from its manifold abuses and disadvantages, I at the same time laboured to demonstrate, that it should not only be accompanied with, but every where, both at home and abroad, actually based on a valid substratum of religious truth, the only sound religious truth in the world, that is, Christianity. (Great cheers.) How often do we now-a-days hear of the streams of this knowledge flowing through the land, and fertilizing the intellects of the people into a rich harvest of intelligence? Yea, after the manner and ampli¬ tude of Oriental hyperbole, how often do we hear this know¬ ledge compared to a mighty ocean that has already begun, and is finally destined to encompass the whole world of intel¬ lectual being ? Well, granting for a moment to the adorers of knowledge their very hearts’ desire, may we not for their special edification push their own parallel into a few particu- 3 lars ? Modern knowledge, say they, is like the great ocean, seen to roll its waters on every shore ! What then !—and if, like the great ocean, it has its serviceable tides, may it not have its destructive inundations too ? (Cheers.) If, like the great ocean, it has depths profound, may it not have its straits and shallows too ? (Cheers.) If, like the great ocean, it has its roads and havens, may it not have its rocks and quick¬ sands too ? (Cheers.) If, like the great ocean, it has its gales and gentle breezes, may it not have its storms and tempests too? (Great cheers.) If then, by some incontrollable neces¬ sity the two kinds of knowledge, secular and sacred, were to be separated by an impassable gulf; if, by the same in¬ controllable necessity, we were left no alternative but to adopt one or other, but only one; and if, to decide our pre¬ ference and election, the question were peremptorily put. Which of the two do you choose ? may I not venture to affirm, in the name of this great audience, that in such a peculiar and extreme case, there is not a real Amr^-Christian in the British empire that would hesitate for a moment to reply, I choose that knowledge, that blessed knowledge of Jesus Christ, and him crucified, which is contained in the Bible, in preference to all the secular knowledge in the world? (Loud cheers.) Never, perhaps, has the immeasur¬ able superiority of the latter been more strikingly displayed, than by Cowper, in those beautiful lines wherein he contrasts the condition and prospects of the poor, but pious English cottager, that sat “ At her own door, Pillow and bobbins all her ‘ little store,’ ” with the condition and prospects of the celebrated French infidel Voltaire. “ She knows, and knows no more, her Bible true, Truth the brilliant Frenchman never knew, And in that charter reads with sparkling eyes, Her title to a treasure in the skies. Oh, happy peasant! oh, unhappy bard ! His the mere tinsel, hers the rich reward. He, praised perhaps for ages yet to come, She never heard of half a mile from home: He lost in error his vain heart prefers, She safe in the simplicity of hers.” (Cheers.) This graphic allusion of Cowper to “ the brilliant French¬ man,” in connexion with the present subject, leads us directly and by a natural association of ideas, to notice the most terrible exemplifications of the tendency and effects of knowledge without religion, recorded in the annals of all time. Some of the original founders of the modern French philosophy, about the middle of last century, were, beyond all debate, in their own sense of the term, philanthropists. Was not K 4 theirs a system, which, according to their calculations, was to regenerate the world without the aid of religion at all ? Before their system, was not barbarism every where to give place to civilization—preponderant rights to equality—and tyranny to liberty? Was not truth, so long buried beneath the rubbish of ages of ignorance and error, to experience a species of resurrection? Was not reason, so long befooled by prejudice and superstition, to be restored to her rightful ascendancy in the intellectual firmament ? In a word, was not the new philosophy to construct an altar whence the flames were expected to ascend, and spread, and brighten, till they poured the stream of illumination round the globe. Mag¬ nificent rising sun of promise ! And doomed how inglori- ously to set in darkness! Alas! the heart of man is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked ; who can know it ? Not one who does, but sees it clearly reflected in the spotless mirror of God’s own word. (Hear, hear.) And the Encyclopaedists and Economists, and the whole body of fra¬ ternizing illuminati of France, in casting that eternal word in derision away from them, did thereby cast away the only lamp that would have guided them into the labyrinth of the heart’s natural perverseness. (Hear, hear.) Who then need wonder that, wholly ignorant as they were of the real nature of the disease, they should have blundered fatally in pre¬ scribing a remedy? And has not the disastrous issue ac¬ cordingly shown, that, instead of kindling a light that might illuminate the world, they were only fanning a flame that was soon to envelop it in a universal conflagration ? (Loud cheers.) Ah ! if one of the better-intentioned of the earlier fathers of the new philosophy had only arisen from the grave, and alighted in the vale of Paris during the midnight gloom of the reign of terror ; if there he had, in personified forms, met his own philosophy metamorphosed into undis¬ guised Atheism, openly proclaiming there was no God, and that death was an eternal sleep ; and along with Atheism, her legitimate offspring, savage anarchy wielding his tremendous scimitar fresh reeking with the blood of thousands of unhappy victims, slaughtered in the name of humanity; ah ! me- thinks he would start back as aghast at the hideous aspect of his own double progeny, as the archangel, fallen from the shapeless monsters he encountered at the gates of Pan¬ demonium! (Great applause.) And, like the thunder- striken seraph, he might thus break silence : —