DUPLICATE HX00014117 "ffC 9G Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2010 witii funding from Open Knowledge Commons http://www.archive.org/details/diseasesofmandatOOgoul DISEASES OF MAN: DATA OF THEIR NOMENCLA TURK, CLASSIFICA TION &^ GENESIS. To DESCRIBE IS TO PARTICULARISE. " Words are the fortresses of thought." " In words are contained the sciences possessed by the nations of the earth. ..." To DEFINE IS TO GENERALISE. Definition is the summary of description. " Perfect definition is the summit of human knowledge in every part of science " "To NAME IS TO KNOW." " The true progress of science must always be realised in names." "Things are known when understood and are understood when interpreted." "The perfection of a science depends, in no inconsiderable degree, upon the perfection of its language; and the perfec- tion of every language upon its simplicity and precision." "To THINK IS TO CLASSIFY," and to classify is to think. " System is the Ariadnean thread without which all is con- fusion." " Classification is not attainable by art only, it requires a mind that is capable of distinguishing things by their specific differences ; not separating things that are alike nor blending things that are different." DISEASES OF MAN: DATA OF THEIR NOMENCLATURE, CLASSIFICATION &<» GENESIS. BY JOHJST ^Sr. S. G^OUILi:E Y, M. D., Surgeon to Bellevue Hospital. NEW YORK : J. H. Vail & Co., 2 1 Astor Place. LONDON: H. K. Lewis, 136 Gower Street. 1888. Copyright, 1888. By J. W. S. Gouley. PREFACE. The objects of this book are ; first, to urge the official adoption of a stable basis for the nomen. clature and classification of the diseases of man ; second, to place before the medical profession certain propositions directed to an improved classification of diseases ; and third, to awaken the attention of teachers to the necessity of ameliorating the nomenclature of medicine, pointing out some of the many misused and im- properly formed words that are now current, and proposing new terms for their considera- tion. 6 PREFACE. In attempting to classify the affections of the male urogenital apparatus, it was found diffi- cult to do so satisfactorily, owing to the defects of the existing nomenclature. This led to an inquiry into the former and actual state of nos- onomy and nosotaxy, and into the methods em- ployed by nosographers from the time of Sauvages to the present. The conclusion ar- rived at, is that a nomenclature and classification to be useful and stable should not only rest upon a proper foundation, but should be duly authorised by the whole profession of medicine. The principles deduced from an analysis of the methods of nomenclators and classifiers are now submitted to the profession ; and certain ques- tions are suggested for discussion in, and for settlement by, the International Medical Congress which properly represents the medical profes- sion. The presentation of this subject to the profes- sion is designed as a plea for the more systematic PREFACE. 7 study of diseases, and as an individual protest against their existing nomenclature and classfica- tion, with the hope that this protest will become general among teachers and others who realise the necessity of bettering the condition of medicine, without undertaking to destroy its fabric in order to reconstruct it ; but rather to modify, simplify, and improve it by gradually substituting exact terms for those that have never conveyed correct ideas. During the preparation of this book, more or less frequent consultations were held with Doctors Clymer, Carroll, Flint, Biggs, Cronyn, Taylor, Clark, Leale, Grauer, John Shrady, Edmund Arnold, and others. The valuable sug- gestions of these kind friends are gratefully acknowledged. Botanists, Mineralogists, Biochemists and Phi- lologists have been consulted with much advant- age and their hints have been thankfully received and carried out. 8 PREFACE. Works on Botany, Zoology, General Chemis" try, Biochemistry, Physiology, Descriptive Anat- omy, General and Special Pathology, and Sur- gery, and many of the treatises on nomenclature and classification have been freely used. A general acknowledgment is made to the authors of these works which have been of the greatest service in this endeavor to elucidate the princi- ples of nosonomy and nosotaxy. 324 Madison Avenue, New-York, January 1888. CONTENTS. PREFACE, page 5-8 CORRIGENDA, " I2 INTRODUCTION "13-24 SECTION I. Preliminary Considerations. Outline of the anatomical view of man. Definition of med- icine. A classification of the science and art of medicine. Medicine and Surgery. Arrangement of medicine into certain departments in accordance with the apparatuses of the humaa body. The physician. Definition of disease. A synopsis of the morbid states and morbific processes of the body. The value and significance of proper anatomical terms in classi- fication. Definition of system, organ, apparatus, and function. Systems and organs perform no function, but yield service to apparatuses. Each apparatus performs only one function, and there is no function without an apparatus, . page 25-72 lO CONTENTS. SECTION II. Human Nosography. A summary of the progress of nosography since its founda- tion. The scope of nosography. Notice of Sauvages. A consense of views necessary in methodical arrangement. Synopses of Sauvages'. Cullen's, Parr's, Good's, and Delorme's arrangements of diseases. Comments on these several sys- tems. Cullen's rules for distinguishing genera, species, and varieties of diseases. Parr's rules. Some of the aphorisms, relating to classification, extracted principally from the phil- osophia botanica of Lmnaeus, by Dr. Thomas Young, page 73-199 SECTION III. NOSOGRAPHICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY. A chronological list of the works on nosography that have appeared from the time of Felix Platerus to the present, page 200-2 1 1 SECTION IV. Basis and Method of the Classification and Character of the Nomenclature of THE Diseases of Man. Many high authorities opposed to classification. To think is to classify. Characteristics of good classifiers. Modem classifiers use terms of classification arbitrarily without taking the pains to define these terms. Nosography on the basis of symptoms misleading and retrogressive. Anatomy the only stable basis for nosography. Description and definition of dis- CONTENTS. II eases. Methods of the nosographer. The use of the dead languages in nomenclature. The names of men should not be applied to diseases. Suggestions for an improved classifi- cation of diseases. A consense of views necessary in the use of terms of classification. Questions suggested for discussion at the Tenth International Medical Congress. Definitions of the terms of classification page 212-252 SECTION V. Review of the Morbid States and Morbific Processes. The Bacteria. Ptomaines, Leucomaines, and Extractives. Analysis of some of the terms used in general pathology and of those contained in the synopsis of morbid states and morbific processes, together with remarks on these states and processes. Summary of the present state of knowledge of the bacteria, ptomaines, leucomaines, and " extractives." The relations borne, to medicine and surgery, by these micro- organisms and alkaloids of putridity. Classifications of the bacteria, ptomaines, and leucomaines. Uniformity in their nomenclature and classification much needed. Remarks on the neoplasams and on their classification, - page 253-379 CONCLUSIONS " 380 CORRIGENDA Page 36, second line, for propylactic, read prophylactic. 40, foot note, for celibary, read celibacy. 48, V. 8, for (obsteoma), read (osteoma). 56, foot note, for eyyEvrjiy read EyyEviji. 63, " " for opyavov, read opyavov. 67, tenth line, for antonomous, read autonomous. 69, fifth line from bottom, for corect, read correct. 102, IX. L, for sangninfluxus, read sanguifiuxus. 150, fourth line, for cornea, read cornea. 212, first line, for authorites, read authorities. 255, foot note, for t'ltoy read V7t6. 365, third line from bottom, for oDoii, read aodii. For Laenec read Laennec. 13 INTRODUCTION. I. This book is divided into five sections. The first section comprises : some anatomical consid- erations of the normal human body; a statement of the objects and scope of medicine ; a classifica- tion of medicine ; the mutual relations of medi- cine and surgery ; an arrangement of medicine into departments in accordance with the appara- tuses of the human body ; the definition and genesis of disease ; a synopsis of the morbid states and morbific processes of the body, de- signed as a suggestion of a ground-work for the classification of diseases; and an analysis of some of the anatomical terms used in classification. The synopsis of morbid states and morbific pro- cesses stops at genera, but a few species are given in foot-notes. The second section relates to the history, de- velopment, scope and significance of human nosography, and contains synopses of a considera- ble number of systematic arrangements of dis- eases, illustrative of the principles of nomencla- ture and classification, and also rules for the guidance of nosographers by Cullen, Parr, Young and Linnaeus. 14 INTRODUCTION. The third section consists of a nosographical bibliography, chronologically arranged, from the time of Felix Platerus. The fourth section is devoted to the elucida- tion of what is conceived to be a proper basis, character, and method of the nomenclature and classification of the diseases of man : and to the definitions of the terms of classification. The fifth section is intended as further explana- tions of the morbid states and morbific processes, and as an analysis of some of the terms used in general pathology, besides which it embodies a summary of the present state of knowledge of the bacteria, ptomaines, ieucomaines, and " ex- tractives," and indicates the relations borne, to medicine and surgery, by these microorganisms and toxic alkaloids of putridity, and finally re- marks on the neoplasms and on their classifica- tion. 2. This work is undertaken with the hope that it will induce all those devoted laborers in the field of medical science who are struggling so diligently to solve great problems in physiology, histology, pathoanatomy, and therapy, to con- sider how much assistance methodical arrange- ment will afford them in their investigations and how much of their time will thereby be saved J INTRODUCTION. 1 5- also how important it will be for them to adopt a correct and uniform nomenclature. They will then probably reject all inexact terms and coin words, — ** verba-fidelia " — in accordance with the conditions they wish to designate with precision. In medicine, the coinage of a new word is at» tended with some difficulty and requires much deliberation, besides the censorship of men of ex- perience and sound judgment. The word should then be submitted to the profession, whose ver- dict on the question of its general adoption should be respected. On this subject of the coin- age of words, Ben Jonson says : " A man coins not a new word without some peril, and less fruit ; for if it happen to be received, the praise is but moderate ; if refused the scorn is assured." At present, a very considerable part of the nomenclature of medicine consists of such a great number of inappropriate, incorrectly formed and misleading terms, that often it is not easy, for investigators, even of the same nation, writing in the same tongue, to understand each other. " It is a waste of time," says Mill, in his Exam- ifzation of Sir William Hamilton s Philosophy, " for a mere student of philosophy to have to learn the familiar use of fifty philosophic phrase- ologies." This applies with much force to the many anatomists and medical investigators who l6 INTRODUCTION. use words of their own invention which others are at great pains to understand. 3. While the progress made in medical art during the last quarter of a century is marvelous, the improvement in the nomenclature has by no means kept pace with this great advance in the art of medicine. Accuracy is often attained in the latter while it seldom obtains in the former. If more attention were given to the formation of scientific language, much confusion and misap- prehension, which have the effect to impede the progress of medical science, would be avoided. The technical terms of medicine derived from the Latin and Greek tongues are used partly for the sake of brevity and partly that they may be understood by the medical profession of the dif- ferent nations that cultivate the dead languages. Unfortunately hovvever the cultivation of these languages is too limited among physicians. As a consequence, many meaningless expressions and as many hybrid words, compounded of Latin and Greek and sometimes of Hebrew roots, very dis- tasteful to the experienced scholar and serving to puzzle rather than to instruct the junior student, are constantly used in text-books and other works. The few modern writers who have un- dertaken the task of improving the nomenclature INTRODUCTION. 1 7 of medicine are little heeded, and professors in the great schools are still thoughtlessly dissem- inating false notions by the careless use of inac- curate expressions in their daily lectures. Many ancient words, however inexact and absurd, are adhered to with great tenacity, and innovations the most appropriate are resisted with an ob- stinacy too little in keeping with the forward movement of the time. Conservatism is praise- worthy Avhen applied to words that have stood the test of years and are still adjudged good and proper, Those time-honored terms v/hich convey ideas with precision should be jealously pre- served ; but that multitude of misleading expres- sions, to be found in the literature of medicine, should be speedily blotted out of coming medical treatises and dictionaries, and their places filled with well chosen and philologically correct words. If teachers in the several departments of medi- cine will earnestly consider this subject, and if each will contribute his share to the reformation, in another quarter of a century there will surely be a more uniform and exact medical language. The needed reformation in medical nomencla- ture should however be rightly directed, and those who undertake it should be mindful of Lord Bacon's precept that " It is good also, not I8 INTRODUCTION. to try experiments ; except the necessity be urgent, or the utility evident : and well to beware that it be the reformation that draweth on the change ; and not the desire of change that pretendeth the reformation." 4. It is improbable that the often repeated statement, " it is not profitable to attempt to change the present methods of writing and of teaching medicine owing to its great mutability,*^ will deter nomenclators and classifiers from the pursuance of their investigations, but it is a fact that they are too little encouraged, even by those who realise the necessity of a radical change in these methods. Exact nosonomy and nosotaxy will surely cause greater changes and advances than have ever been made in medicine. To give correct names to diseases involves the closest in- quiry into their nature. It is therefore fair to assume that the time will come when the name given to each disease shall indicate its nature. When this good time does come, medicine will be taught as other sciences are taught. The con- sideration of the advances destined to be made by a methodical nosography, leads to the conclu- sion that it must keep pace with the advancement to which it has given rise, and must of necessity be provisional. INTRODUCTION. 1 9 5. The inexact nomenclature of diseases, and the defective arrangement and inconsistencies in existing S3'stems are such that it is almost im^ possible for the student to learn medicine as he should ; and, in view of its continued advances, this will be quite impossible in a quarter of a century, unless a radical change be made first in the nomenclature of anatomy and next in the nomenclature and classification of diseases. Without an accurate nomenclature and classi- fication, the one hundred and tvv^enty thousand flowering plants could not have been known, nor could the immense number of species of animals be studied, and it would not have been possible to obtain an accurate knowledge of minerals. Thus Botany, Zoology, and Mineralogy, have for many years, taken each a high rank among the sciences owing to proper nomenclature and to methodical arrangement. The science of medicine will never progress as it should and will never be learned as it should be learned until it is placed upon the same foot- ing as that of the natural sciences. Without an accurate nomenclature and classi- fication it is very difficult for the practising phy- sician to have the clear understandmg of diseases so necessary to their rational treatment. All morbid states of the human body should be 20 INTRODUCTION. known by names that indicate their nature, and it is only a right conception of this nature which can lead to the use of appropriate remedies. 6. The terras nomenclature and classiiication of diseases do not by themselves express with suf- ficient precision the scope and objects of syste- matic arrangement. Therefore the word nosog- raphy should, in its broadest sense, be employed to signify the whole, or some part of the science of medicine as, for example, human nosography, nosography of the uro-genital apparatus, or of any other apparatus of the human body. 7. It is often said that language fails to express with accuracy the ideas which man conceives of things. Sweepmg as this statement may seem, it is defensible, particularly in the case of medical language which so much needs reconstruction. That however which causes the greatest per- plexity in the expression of ideas, is the misap- plication of words, and also their employment in different senses, so as to give to each several meanings. Since it is not probable — at least not for a very long time — , that human language will consist of words having each a single meaning, the most judicious use should be made of existing terms and the greatest care taken in the forma- tion of new words ; and all writers should strive INTRODUCTION. 21 to give a clear exposition of their ideas by some- times explaining the words of many meanings which they are obliged to employ. Some of the great faults in medical language are : (i,) the misapplication of words; (2,) the use of improp- erly constructed words; (3,) the use of words which do not convey an exact idea of the object designated ; and (4,) the use of men's names to designate diseases. These faults are all remedia- ble, but to repair them most effectually and to prevent their recurrence, a consense of views in the medical profession is absolutely necessary ; then the changes in terms will be uniform, will come authoritatively, and will therefore be ac- cepted. It appears that medicine is not the only science whose progress has been hindered by abuses in terms. In his Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind, Dugald Stewart says : " When I consult Johnson's Dictionary, I find many words of which he has enumerated forty, fifty, or even sixty dif- ferent significations ; and, after all the pains he has taken to distinguish these from each other, I am frequently at a loss how to avail myself of his definitions." A great thinker and metaphysician comments^ 22 INTRODUCTION. -as follows, upon words and deplores their wrong usage. " In words are contained the knowledge and sciences possessed by the nations of the earth A strict adherence to propriety in the use of words, is the only means for maintain- ing clearness of ideas, for preserving and har- monising them Many ancient and modern sophists, and many profane philosophers, sought artfully to alter the true value and force of words. The world could scarcely be deceived except by such alteration. Abuse has been made of almost all philosophical and political terms, as has been frequently shown by various writers. Whoever takes note of the errors that have arisen from the abuse of the word Nature, in the sciences of Right and Politics — of the words Sensation, Pleasure, Pain, in Metaphysics ; of the words Equality and Liberty in Politics; of the word Wealth in Political Economy — and of the many others to which, generally, there has been added only a more extensive signification than that given them by common usage, will discover the sources of incredible deceptions to the mind, and of incredible evils to humanity." (Rosmini^ Introduzione alia Filosojia.) Max Miiller in his Science of Thought ^ 1887, (p. 18) says :,.....*' That every one of these words INTRODUCTION. 23 is used in different senses by different philoso- phers, might be tolerated, if each philosopher would tell us clearly, and once for all, in what sense he himself means to use them. This is what few attempt to do ; and if they do it, they often seem to imagine that because there are so many words, there must be also so many distmc- tions. They overburden us with definitions and make confusion worse confounded." The following, which is much to the purpose is also quoted from the recent work of Max Miiller. " All I maintain is that, not only to a considera- ble extent, but always and altogether, we think by means of names, and that things are no more to us than what we mean by their names. What we really mean by names must be settled by defi- nition, and according as our knowledge changes, the definition and therefore the meaning of names will change. Every new addition to our ex- perience may be said to change, to correct, or to complete the intension and the extension of our names, but before we can use our new knowledge, it must always have been embodied either in an old or a new name There may be little or much, there may be false or true knowledge in our names, but without some sort of name we cannot reason," (p. 35, Science of Thought,) 24 INTRODUCTION. 8. As a means to the desired end, students of medicine should be thoroughly drilled in the use of words of precision, whose employment is coupled with exact knowledge, — not forgetting the fact that to name is to know^ for these two words have been traced to the same root whose antiquity is almost as great as that of man — , and exact medical knowledge, methodically arranged, will inevitably lead to its practical application in the cure of disease or the alleviation of human suffering. High as is the achievement of curing disease or of alleviating suffering, the physician should aspire to the still higher object of preserv- ing the health of the people. This should be the end of medicine. •^ PRINCIPLES OF NOMEiXCLATURE AND CLASSIFICATION. SECTION I. Preliminary Considerations. Outline of the anatomical view of man. Definition of medi- cine. A classification of the science and art of medicine. Medicine and Surgery. Arrangement of medicine into certain departments in accordance with the apparatuses of the human body. The physician. Definition of disease. A synopsis of the morbid states and morbific processes of the body. The value and significance of proper anatomical terms in classifi- cation. Definition of system, organ, apparatus, and function. Systems and organs perform no function, but yield service to apparatuses. Each apparatus performs only one function, and there is no function without an apparatus. THE HUMAN BODY. Anatomically considered man's body is a grand complex apparatus destined to perform the one function of reproduction of its species. To that end the male and female must couple. The sperm of the male then fecundates the ovum 26 THE HUMAN BODY. which is within the female, and she completes the function of reproduction of the species. This primary human apparatus is an assem- blage of secondary apparatuses that are intended to perform certain special functions, some of which are designed to conserve the individual, and others to keep the body in a healthy condi- tion and fit it for the performance of its one great function. The senses of man, each of which being the function of a special apparatus, are all subservi- ent to the genetic sense, to the one paramount function, requiring the union of the sexes for its accomplishment. Such are the facts that may be gleaned from anatomy, but archaeology too teaches its lesson. It appears that many of the ancient nations made the external genital organs of both sexes objects of worship, so much importance did they attach to generation, and that traces of phallic worship have been discovered within a comparatively re- cent period, even among the savage tribes of the South Sea Islands, and of North, Central, and South America. Anatomy and archaeology having spoken their word, if a glance be now cast at chapter i, verse 28, of the Book of Genesis, it will be seen that, for a long series of centuries, civilized man has THE HUMAN BODY. 2/ entertained the belief that the object of his exist- ence is to multiply his species. The first com- mand to man was " Increase and multiply and fill the earth." That was to be the one function of man. The other commands, to subdue the earth and rule over all living creatures, are sub- ordinate to the first command, to the one func- tion. Man was to subdue the earth to the end of fulfilling that first command, and he was to rule over all living creatures and make such use of them as might be subservient to that first command. The general disobedience of that command w^ould entail disease, death and the speedy extinction of the species. All organic nature is busy with the multiplica- tion of species. In the lowest forms of animal and vegetable life this multiplication continues until by some accident the process is interrupted. Such an interruption is one of the checks to the inordinate increase of the species ; but when the process ceases, extinction is the inevitable out- come. Man alone is prone to violate the great law of creation which impels organized beings to repro- duce their kind. In these days there are too many unfortunates who, desirous to sin without conceiving, adopt the most injurious means to effect their purpose. Among these may be men- 28 DEFINITION AND OBJECTS OF MEDICINE. tioned the iniquity of Onan, so common among the hig-her classes, so demoralising and so hurt- ful to both the male and female. Most persons are conscious that many of their diseases are caused by their own vices and ex- cesses, the consequences of which are certain to assail and perhaps to destroy them. Often blinded however by their passions, or heedless of nature's inexorable laws they fail to perceive the cause of a particular malady until it is almost if not altogether too late for its removal. Then perhaps they have reluctant recourse to the physician. DEFINITION AND OBJECTS OF MEDICINE. It often happens that certain patients long hesitate to consult the true physician, who pre- scribes for disease and not for symptoms, be- cause of their vague notions of the character and scope of rational medicine — so much derided by cynics and charlatans — and of their idea that the practiser of medicine gropes in the dark in his search for the nature of diseases and for the means of their cure, and that his diagnosis is con- jectural while his treatment is empirical. To a man of this class the title of Doctor in medicine is a misnomer, because the " Doctors " whom he DEFINITION AND OBJECTS OF MEDICINE. 29 knows are neither learned nor wise. He had never been able to make the distinction between the ignorant pretender and the conscientious and well qualified physician. He is at length brought face to face with a Doctor whose mental quali- ties give him a right to the title. After a short conference he propounds the old question so often asked by the laity, '' what is meant by medicine, and can it be ranked as a science " ? The answer to this question involves a definition of a science and of an art. If knowledge, acquired by study, experiment, and observation, methodically arranged to serve as a basis upon which are established general and particular principles for guidance in the practice of an art, be accepted as one of the definitions of a science, and if an art can be defined as skill acquired in the use of means for the accomplishment of an end, then medicine is entitled to be ranked as a science and an art. These definitions mav be thus condensed ; science is to know, and art is to do. This is the answer to the second part of the question. The first part will be answered by a definition of medicine and by a concise statement of its aims and of the methods employed in its study. Medicine,* as related to man, may be defined * Medicine, from mederi, to heal. 30 DEFINITION AND OBJECTS OF MEDICINE. as the science of man in his abnormal states, and the art of curing or ol alleviating disease. Medicine presupposes the science of man in his normal state, and implies the arts of preserv- ing health, of preventing disease, and of prolong- ing life. Medicine and its fundamental science and associated arts lay under contribution botany, zoology, mineralogy, chemistry, pharmacology, physics, mathematics, and mechanics ; assist in the execution of the law of the land, particularly in the special department known as Medical Jurisprudence ; aid the State in the prevention of disease, through the department of State Medicine ; and have their influence upon the morals of the people. The system of medical morals written by the Father of scientific medi- cine more than two thousand years ago, is so sound in its broad principles as to have required no changes except in a few details, and the addi- tions that have been made thereto only serve to enforce these principles. The best modern ethical essays are founded upon the Hippocratic oath which was itself erected upon the imperishable foundation of reason, truth, justice, and bene- ficence. There can be only one medicine, the medicine which, together with its fundamental science and associated arts, is ever seeking the CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINE. 3 1 truth, and whose objects are to prevent, heal, or alleviate disease, to preserve health, and to pro- long life. True medicine, founded as it is upon biology, is not fettered by dogmata and is therefore al- ways advancing. The student of medicine must understand the laws of life, and be acquainted with the science of man in his normal condition, and very particularly with the functions of the apparatuses of his body. Until then he is unfit to study, and still more unfit to cope with dis- ease. This leads to what is believed to be a proper classification of medicine. CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINE. Medicine comprises : (A,) the science ; and (B,) the art of medicine. A. THE SCIENCE of medicine and its funda- mental science of man in a normal state consist : (I,) of anthropophysiography, or the description of man in a state of health ; and (II,) of anthro- ponosography, or the description of man in a state of disease. I. Anthropophysiography comprises all the branches of anatomy and is the same as human biology. Anatomy is divided into: (i,) transcendental 32 CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINE. anatomy ; (2,) homological anatomy ; (3,) phys- iognomical anatomy; (4,) embryology; (5,) de- scriptive anatomy ; (6,) comparative anatomy ; (7,) topographical anatomy ; (8,) histology ; (9,) stoechiology ; (10,) human ph^^siology ; and (11,) comparative physiology.* 1. Transcendental anatomy is the study: (i,) of the general design of the body ; and (2,) of the particular design of the organs. 2. Homological anatomy is the study of the cor- relations of the several parts of the body — (i,) of the organs and their parts ; (2,) of the tissues ; and (3,) of the apparatuses of the body. J. Physiogjtomical anatomy is the study of ex- pressions depicted upon the exterior of the body, more particularly upon the face, such as expres- sions of joy, despondency, mental anxiety, pain, fear, anger, etc. ; and is also the study of those expressions induced by disease. -f * These branches of anatomy are not ordinarily studied in the order in which they appear above, but the arrangement adopted is in correspondence with the general plan of this work. t The facies of disease were very long ago carefully studied. Hippocrates described so graphically the expression often in- duced by the exhaustion incidental to certain chronic and acute diseases, and by long fasting, that this expression bears CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINE. 33 ^. Embryology is the study : (i,) o^ the fecund- ation of the ovum ; (2,) of the growth of the embryo ; and (3,) of the development of the organs. 5. Descriptive anatomy is the study : (i,) of the general configuration of the body and of the particular configuration of its several parts ; (2,) of the gross appearances of the organs ; (3.) of the construction of the organs ; (4,) of the form, size, color, consistency and weight of the organs ; and (5,) of the composition of the apparatuses. 6. Comparative anatomy is the study and com- parison of the body and organs of man with those of the lower animals. Its object is to ascer- tain the nature of the modifications of structure adapted to the needs of different animals. 7. Topographical anatomy is the study of the situations and relations of the several parts and organs of the body. 8. Histology is the study: (i,) of the minute structure of the tissues ; and (2,) of the minute structure of the organs. the name of fades Hippocratica, There are too the facies of cancer, of tuberculosis, of cholera, of hysteria, of epilepsy, etc. The facial expressions varying also according to the seat of particular diseases. 34 CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINE. 9. Stoechiology * is the study of the chemical elements of the gases, fluids, and solids of the body. 10. Htwian physiology is> t\iQ studiy '. (i,) of the uses of the organs ; and (2,) of the functions of the apparatuses of the body of man. //. Comparative physiology is the study and comparison of the uses of the organs and of the functions of the apparatuses of all organized beings. 11. Antroponosography, which should be based upon all the branches of anatomy, consists of the two divisions: (i,) teratology; and (2,) pathology. 1. Teratology is the study of the congenital anomalies of the whole or of parts of the body. 2. Pathology is the study: (i,) of general diseases ; (2,) of diseases of particular organs ; {3,) of diseases consequent upon parasitic inva- sion of the human organism ; (4,) of the conse- quences of the introduction of foreign substances into the body ; (5,) of the effects of injuries ; (6,) of the consequences of the ingestion of poisons ; and (7,) of functional disorders of the appara- tuses. * Stoechiology — from 6roix^iov, an element — is ordinarily taught under the names of physiological chemistry and organic chemistry. CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINE. 35 The means employed in the study of disease consist in making proper use ; (i,) of aetiology ; (2,) of symptomatology ; (3,) of semeiology ; (4,) of pathoanatomy ; (5,) of pathohistology ; (6,) of nosonomy ; (7,) of nosotaxy ; (8,) of diagnosis ; and (9,) of prognosis. B. THE ART of medicine and its associated arts consist: (i,) of h3^giene, or the art of pre- serving health ; (2,) of prophylaxy, or the art of preventing disease ; (3,) of therapy, or the art of curing or of alleviating disease ; and (4,) of biothalmy, or the art of prolonging life. I. Hygiene,* or the art of preserving health — The preservation of health is generally effected by the strict observance of the rules which relate to the maintenance, in their normal state, of the functions of the body and which are directed principally: (i,) to alimentation; (2,) to exer- cise; (3,) to clothing; (4,) to sleep ; (5,) to ablu- tion ; (6,) to residence ; (7,) to ventilation ; (8,) to light ; (9,) to temperature ; etc. II. PROPHYLAXY,t or the art of preventing dis- ease. — Disease may be prevented : (i,) by avoid- ance of contagion ; (2,) by abstention from ex- cesses ; (3,) by the strict observance of the rules * Hygiene, from vyi'sid, health. t Prophylaxy, from itpo, beforehand, and (pvXdzr eiv y to guard. 36 CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINE. of hygiene ; (4,) by the use of medicinal sub- stances having propy lactic properties ; (5,) by the selection of a suitable climate ; (6,) by disin- fection ; (7,) by proper house drainage ; (8,) by the isolation of cases of contagions disease. III. Therapy, * or the art of curing or of al- leviating disease. — It should be borne in mind that many diseases are cured by unassisted na- ture, nevertheless they require the closest ob- servation of the medical attendant. Meddle- some physic in such circumstances is often pro- ductive of much evil. Here then is a field for the exercise of good judgment on the part of the wise physician who knows when to apply and when to abstain from applying remedies. Here too is the opportunity for the charlatan to make the most of his spurious wares, and to boast of *' great cures " which he never effected. How- ever, in ordinary circumstances of disease, na- ture needs assistance and this assistance should be intelligent, prompt, and efhcient. Such assist- ance may be directed : (i,) to a general disease ; (2,) to a special disease of a particular organ ; (3,) to an injury ; etc. The internal use of med- icaments, external applications, mechanical ap- pliances, or the surgeon's ministrations, may be * Therapy, from OspaTCevsiVy to cure. CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINE. 3/ needed. From these resources, for the cure or alleviation of disease, it is the office of the physician to select that which is suited to in- dividual cases. IV. BiOTHALMY,* or the art of prolonging life. — Man's life may be prolonged beyond its ordi- nary duration, if he be free from disease, (i,) by great sobriety and moderation in all his acts ; (2,) by the close observance of the rules of hygiene ; (3,) by avoidance of exposure during inclement weather ; and (4,) by his leading a serene exist- ence, free from the cares of ordinary life, but with pleasant pursuits. f When man is affected with incurable disease, his life may be prolonged : * Biothalmy, from Bio^aXjuioi, long-lived. Macrobiosis is also used to express the idea of longevity. t On this important subject of the prolongation of man's life, the reader may, u'ith advantage, consult " The Code of Health and Longevity," by Sir John Sinclair, Edinburgh, 1807. This very interesting and valuable compilation, in four octavo volumes, contains : rules for preserving health and promoting longevity ; regulations for the health of the community ; an account of the doctrines of Hippocrates concerning health and longevity ; also accounts of Galen ; of the minor Greek authors ; and of the Arabian and Jewish authors who have written on the subject of health ; and of Cicero and Seneca on old age and the shortness of life. It also contains the "Regimen Sanitatis Salerni," with Doctor Holland's transla- tion thereof ; an account of Lewis Cornaro, a Venitian gentle- 38 CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINE. (i,) by a proper dietary ; (2,) by suitable medica- ments ; (3,) by the maintenance of certain func- tions, as far as practicable, in their normal state ; (4,) by rest or exercise as needed, and attention ta the conditions of the physical surroundings ; (5,} by mechanical appliances ; and (6,) by a surgical operation, if such be required. man who livecl a " sober life " and died aged upward of one hundred years , of the weighing chair of Sanctorius and of his Medicina Statica ; and an account of British authors wha have written upon health and longevity, from Friar Bacon, vrho died in the year 1292, to Doctor Waterhouse in 1805. Among the many accounts of centenarians given in this work,, are those of John Rovin in his one hundred and seventy- second (172) year, and of his wife Sarah in her one hundred and sixty-fourth (164) year, and of Petratsch Zortan in the one hundred and eighty-fifth (185) year of his age, with en- gravings of their portraits which had belonged to the Percys^ Earl of Northumberland. An essay by J. P. M. Flourens, bearing the following title, may also be profitably consulted : " De la longevite humaine et de la quantite de vie sur le globe," Paris, 1856. A very interesting paper on " the habits and family history of centenarians" by Professor Humphry appeared in the " Popular Science Monthly " for March 1887. This paper had formed a part of a report on the subject by Professor Hum- phry to the British Medical Association. It contains an analysis of the table of centenarians, by A. Francis, M. R, C. S., of Kings College, Cambridge, which is well worthy of careful perusal. 39 MEDICINE AND SURGERY. Medicine has been separated into two depart- ments : ( I,) Medicine proper, or, as the French still call it, internal pathology ; and (2,) Surgery,, or external pathology."^ Neither designation is * For many centuries medicine was in the hands of the priesthood. In Eg>'pt, for instance, none but the priests were permitted to minister to the sick; among the early Israelites, the Prophets, Priests and Levites were the only physicians ; and the Priests of Apollo and of Esculapius were, for a long time, the only medical advisers of the Greek people. This most ancient custom, of combining the offices of physician and priest, was adopted by the Christian clergy and prevailed^ with few interruptions, until the middle of the eighteenth century. The school of Salernum owed its celebrity, from the eighth to the twelveth century, to the many learned members of the clergy who there taught or were taught medicine. Among these illustrious men may be mentioned ; Theodore, Arch- bishop of Canterbury ; Wigart, Bishop of Hildesheim ; Cuthbert, the English monk ; the monk Campo ; Hughes, Abbot of Saint Denis ; John of Ravenna ; and Gerbert, after- wards Pope Sylvester 11. They had all learned the medicine of the Arabs. During the eleventh century the Benedictine monks of Monte Cassino greatly distinguished themselves at the Saler- num school, and Didier, the Abbot of Monte Cassino, who be- came Pope Victor III, was one of the teachers in that renowned school. In the twelveth century priests were forbidden to practise 40 MEDICINE AND SURGERY. rational, for '' medicine proper " has to deal as much with external as with internal diseases, and surgery has as much to do with internal as with external diseases. The physician uses his hands in diagnosis and in mmistering to the sufferings of his patients as much as does the surgeon. The word "surgery," meaning simply the art of healing by the use of the hands, does not neces- sarily imply how the hands shall be used. It does not mean that the hand must needs contain a cautery or a knife any more than a blister or a poultice, or that the hands shall reduce a hernia surgery, that is to say to use the knife and shed human blood or to use the actual cautery, and even to study medicine. But during the crusades, and when leprosy was imported into Western Europe, the lepers' hospitals were attended entirely by monks. There came another prohibition, in the latter part of the thirteenth century, under the pontificate of Boniface VIII. The law of celibary imposed, in France, upon physicians, was abrogated, m 1452, through the influence of Cardinal d'Etouteville. This should have placed medicine entirely in the hands of the laity. It did not however ; for the clergy continued to practise medicine. The final decree prohibiting priests from practising medicine or surgery was promulgated in the middle of the eighteenth century during the pontificate of Benedict XIV. (Diocesan decrees. Book XIII, chapter X.) Medicine and surgery were not made absolutely distinct branches until the fourteenth century. MEDICINE AND SURGERY. 4I rather than percuss a chest or administer a po- tion. The term ''medicine" was applied to the healing of wounds long before internal diseases were understood. The term chirurgery, relating to manual opera- tions, was, according to Celsus, not used until the time of Herophilus (307 B. C). A few cen- turies ago the word surgeon was employed to designate the " barber-surgeon " in contradistinc- tion from the educated healer who was styled "*' Master in chirurgery." In France, as early as the beginning of the fourteenth century, no barber-surgeon was per- mitted to exercise his calling until he had been examined by certain Masters in chirurgery.* It would seem preferable to use the word med- icine as a generic term and to arrange the science and art of medicine into certain departments in accordance with the several apparatuses of the body such, for instance, as relate ; (I,) to affec- tions of the cephalo-rhachidian apparatus and of its subsidiary apparatuses ; (II,) to affections of * " Rule in favor of the Masters in chirurgery of the month of August 1301," contained in Girodat's presentation of the case of the surgeons of Paris under the title of '• Recherches Critiques et Historiques sur VOrigine, sur les Divers Etats, €t sur les Pr ogres de la Ckzrurgie en France," Paris 1744, p. 435. 42 THE PHYSICIAN. the nutritive apparatus and of its subsidiary ap- paratuses ; (III,) to affections of the motory apparatus ; (IV,) to affections of the cutaneous apparatus ; and (V,) to affections of the generative apparatus which united to the urinary apparatus constitutes the uro-genital apparatus. General affections, involving several appara- tuses, should also be arranged into proper groups. THE PHYSICIAN. The ancient Greeks called the physicians idrpoiy the healer. The ideal physician should however be more than a mere healer of wounds or a prescriber of pills and potions. — Handicraft and shrewdness are his lowest attributes. — He should, in a broad sense ol the word, be a philan- thropist (implying not only a lover but a knower of man), and a close, thoughtful, observer of the nature of the human apparatuses, the disorders of whose functions he has to interpret. He- should investigate questions relating to the structural and other characters of diseases. He should devise means for the cure of diseases, and* formulate rules for their prevention. He should be both iatrosophisia and iatrotecJina,, learned in. the science and skilled in the art of medicine. 43 DEFINITION AND GENESIS OF DISEASE. In this connection it will be proper to answer the commonly asked question ; " What is meant by disease?" Disease is a deviation from the normal state of the whole or of any part of the body. The term disease* was long ago introduced into medical language to express the idea of bodily uneasiness or distress such as may be caused by an injury ; by an interruption, or a disturbance of vital functions ; or by an alteration in the structure of an organ or of several organs of an apparatus or of all the apparatuses of the body. Hence it is that diseases have been classed into functional and organic diseases.f But dis- ease of an organ always disorders, in a greater * The etymology of the word disease though having little scientific value, is not without interest. This word is derived from dis, without, and ease, through the old French desaise, lack of ease, uneasiness, distress. t In a v/ritten communication on this subject, Professor Meredith Clymer of New York uses the following language : " There can be no change in the accustomed expression of an activity — either by increase, diminution or perversion — with- out coincident change in the plasmode. Hence strictly there can be no such thmg as a functional as distinguished from a structural disease. Disease is always material, whether recognisable as such or not." 44 DEFINITION AND GENESIS OF DISEASE. or less degree, the function of the apparatus to which it belongs, and sometimes disorders the functions of several apparatuses. Therefore such a classification is faulty and misleading. The affections of the human body may be : (i.) Congenital, resulting from vices of the pri- mary conformation ; (2.) Hereditary, transmitted by progenitors ; (3.) Primary, arising from more or less well known causes ; (4.) Secondary, consequent upon preexisting dis- ease — in this case the word pathengenetic * expresses briefly the idea of a disease spring- ing from another disease ; (5.) Traumatic, resulting from injuries ; or (6.) May be the outcome of errors of diet, of the effects of climate, of parasitic invasion, and of gaseous, mineral, vegetable, or animal poisons, including ptomaines and leucomaines. Although these affections number many spe- cies, the morbid states and morbific processes from which these species originate are compara- tively few and are comprised under the follow- ing captions : ( I,) alterations in the composition of the blood ; (2,) disturbances in the circulatory * The word pathengenetic was lately coined by Dr. Alfred L. Carroll. MORBID STATES & MORBIFIC PROCESSES. '45 apparatus ; (3,) pathengenetic alterations of struc- ture ; (4,) retrograde metamorphoses; (5,) new growths; (6,) granulation-growths; (7,) cysts; (8,) stones; (9,) injuries; (10,) monsters; (11,) extraneous bodies; (12,) parasites ; (13,) poisons ; (14,) functional disorders. SYNOPSIS OF THE MORBID STATES AND MORBIFIC PROCESSES OF THE BODY, BEING A SUGGESTION OF A GROUND WORK FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES. I. Alterationes in quantitate, in qualitate, et in compositione sanguinis, (Alterations in the quantity, quality, and composition of the blood). 1. Hyperaemia, (Superabundance of blood). 2. Hypoaemia, (Insufficiency of blood). 3. Hyperhydraemia, (Increase of blood- water). 4. Hypohydraemia, (Decrease of blood-water). 5. Hyperinosaemia, (Increase of blood-fibrin). 6. Hypoinosaemia, (Decrease of blood-fibrin). 7. Hyperleucontaemia,* (Increase of blood-albumen). 8. Hypoleucontaemia, (Decrease of blood-albumen). 9. Hyperalonaemia, (Increase of blood-salts). 10. Hypoalonaemia, (Decrease of blood-salts.) II. Hyperchromataemia, (Increase of blood-color). * XsvHoVf the white of an egg — albumen. 46 MORBID STATES & MORBIFIC PROCESSES. 12. Hypochromataemia, (Decrease of blood-color). 13. Hyperleucoc3'thaemia, (Increase of white blood- cells). 14. Hypoleucocythaemia, (Decrease of white blood- cells). 15. Hypererythrocythaemia, (Increase of red blood- cells). 16. Hypoerythrocythaemia, (Decrease of red blood- cells). 17. Hyperlipaemia, (Increase of blood-fat). 18. Hypolipaemia, (Decrease of blood-fat). 19. Hyperphysaemia, (Increase of blood-gas). 20. Hypophysaemia, (Decrease of blood-gas). 21. Hyperglycaemia, (Increase of blood-sugar). 22. Hypoglycaemia, (Decrease of blood-sugar). 23. Acetonaemia, (Acetone in the blood). 24. Ammoniaemia, (Ammonia in the blood). 25. Hyperuraemia, (Increase of blood-urea). 26. Hypouraemia, (Decrease of blood-urea). 27. Hyperuricaemia, (Increase of blood-uric acid). 28. Hypouricaemia, (Decrease of blood-uric acid). 29. Cholaemia, (Bile in the blood). 30. Hypercholesteraemia, (Increase of blood-choles- terin). 31. Hypocholesteraemia, (Decrease of blood-choles- terin). 32. Melanaemia, (Black pigment in the blood). 33. Septicaemia, (Putrid infection of the blood). 34. Pyosapraemia, (Putrid-pus infection of the blood). MORBID STATES & MORBIFIC PROCESSES. 4/ II. Turbationes in apparatus circulationis, (Disturbances in the circulatory apparatus). 1. Ischaemia,* (Arrest of the blood). 2. Athroisaemia,f (Blood accumulation, congestion). 3. Phlegmasia,^ (Inflammation). 4. Lymphexomosis, (Transudation of lymph). 5. Lymphorrhagia, (Flow from a rent lymph-vessel). 6. Haemorrhagia, (Flow from a rent blood-vessel). 7. Haemodiapedisis, (Oozing through blood-vessel walls). 8. Thrombosis, § (Coagulation). 9. Embolismus,! (Plugging.) III. Alterationes structurae pathengeneticae, (Pathengenetic alterations of structure). 1. Hypertrophia, (Hypertrophy). 2. Hypotrophia, (Hypotrophy). 3. Atrophia, (Atrophy). 4. Auxesis, (Enlargement, increase). * Anaemia localis, (Local capillary anaemia). t Athroisaemia, from dBpoi6}xa, accumulation, and axiioLy blood. Athroisaemia activa et passiva. Eff usio serosa. \ Exudationes. § Angiohaemothrombus (blood-vessel clot), cardiohaemo- thrombus (heart clot). I Angioembolus, (Vessel plug). 48 MORBID STATES & MORBIFIC PROCESSES. 5. Ectasis, (Dilatation, expansion). 6. Stenosis, (Contraction, stricture). 7. Echmasis, (Obstacle, obstruction). IV. Metamorphoses retrogrades, (Retrograde metamorphoses). 1. Necrosis,* (Necrosis, death). 2. Meiosis, (Meiosis, decrease). 3. Degeneratio,t (Degeneration). 4. Infiltratio,); (Infiltration). V. Neoplasmata, (New-growths). (i.) Desmoneoplasmata, [Connective tissue neoplasms), 1. Endothelioma, (Endothelioma). 2. Sarcoma, (Sarcoma). 3. Inoma, (Fibroma). 4. Myxoma, (Myxoma). 5. Neuroglioma, (Neuroglioma). 6. Lipoma, (Lipoma). 7. Chondroma, (Chondroma). 8. Osteoma, (Obsteoma). * Necrosis, — coagulationis, colliquativa, et caseosa. Gan- graena humida et sicca. Ulceratio. t Degeneratio, — granulosa, adiposa, amyloides, colloides, mucoides, hyalina, inoides, et sclerosa. X Infiltratio, — adiposa, pigmentaria, calcarea, et urica. MORBID STATES & MORBIFIC PROCESSES. 49 (2.) Myoneoplasmata, (Muscular tissue neoplasms\ I. Myoma,* (Myoma). (3.) Neuroneoplasmata, {Nerve tissue neoplasms). I. Neuroma, (Neuroma). (4.) Angioneoplasmata^ {Vascular tissue neoplasms). I. Angioma,! (Angioma). (5.) Epithelioneoplasmata^ {Epithelial neoplasms.) 1. Epithelioma, (Epithelioma). 2. Carcinoma, (Cancer). 3. Adenoma, (Glandular growth). VI. Blastomata, (Granulation growths), 1. Syphilis, (Syphilis). 2. Ulcus chancroides, (Chancroid ulcer). 3. Lepra, (Leprosy). 4. Tuberculosis, (Tuberculosis). 5. Lupus, (Lupus). 6. Equinia, (Glanders). 7. Actinomycosis, (Actinomycosis). 8. Rhinoscleroma, (Rhinoscleroma). * Rhabdomyoma, leiomyoma, t Haemangioma, lymphangioma. (St. 50 MORBID STATES & MORBIFIC PROCESSES. VII. Cystides, (Cysts.) VIII. Lithi, (Stones). 1. Sialolithus, (Salivary stone). 2. Chololithus, (Gall stone). 3. Enterolithus, (Intestinal stone). 4. Urolithus, (Urinary stone). 5. Prostatolithus (Prostatic stone). 6. Piilebolithus, (Vein stone). IX. Traumata, (Injuries,) including all kinds of injuries to the body. X. Terata, (Monsters,) including all kinds of congenital anomalies of the body. XI. Corpora extranea, (Extraneous bodies,) in- cluding the lodgment, in the body, of all kinds of foreign substances. XII. Parasiti, (Parasites). 1. Entozoa, (Entozoa). 2. Ectozoa, (Ectozoa). 3. Entophyta, (Entophyta). 4. Epiphyta, (Epiphyta). MORBID STATES & MORBIFIC PROCESSES. 5 1 XIII. Venena, (Poisons,) including all kinds of gaseous, mineral, vegetable, and animal poisons. XIV. Vitia functionum, (Disorders of the functions. 1. Perversio, (Perversion). 2. Deficiens, (Deficiency). 3. Immoderatio, (Excess). 4. Diminutio, (Diminution). 5. Suspensio, (Suspension). 6. Abolitio, (Abolition). COMMENTS ON SOME OF THE TERMS USED IN THE SYNOPSIS OF MORBID STATES AND MORBIFIC PROCESSES. The names given to the morbid states and morbific processes of the body should be changed whenever the true nature of these states and pro- cesses is discovered. Many of the names only convey an erroneous idea of the condition which they are intended to express. The term inflam7nation^ for instance, is used under protest until a better term shall be agreed 52 TERMS USED IN THE SYNOPSIS OF upon by the profession. The coinage of this word is based upon symptoms and not upon morbid properties. When the exact pathic con- dition of this so called inflammatory process is clearly defined, the proper name will be found, and when this is found, words will probably be coined in place of those ending in itis to denote inflammation of particular parts of the body. Auxesis'^ is placed under the caption alterations of structure because increase in bulk of an organ may and does occur independently of what is called inflammation. This word is substituted for hypertrophy which ordinarily is improperly used in the sense of augmentation. Hypertrophy neither means nor does it even imply enlarge- ment. It signifies over-nourishment, the opposite of no nourishment or atrophy. When the body is over-fed, the organs do not of necessity en- large, but much of the surplus nourishment is de- posited, in the form of fat, under the skin, in the mesentery, and around the kidneys; this is an example of true hypertrophy. The organs of the human body receive nourishment to the ex- * Auxesis, from av^7^6ii, increase, augmentation enlarge- ment. MORBID STATES & MORBIFIC PROCESSES. 53 tent of their requirements, neither more nor less whatever may be their condition. When, from disease, an organ slowly increases in size and afterwards does not tend to decrease, the calibre and length of its nutrient arteries are often found to be increased and the thickness of the walls of these vessels is also proportinately aug- mented. This condition of the blood vessels is not ordinarily called hypertrophy. It is assuredly a great inconsistency to apply the term hyper- trophy to an enlarged organ and not to its en- larged arteries. The careful study of the morbid anatomy of enlarged organs shows that the auxesis has a cause entirely foreign to over- nourishment. The disturbing element may or may not be carried to it by the blood, and when it is so carried, the enlargement is due to this dis- turbing element and not to the quantity of blood which is only proportionate to the demand of the organ for its adequate nutrition. A liver enor- mously enlarged from cancerous disease is not generally called hypertrophied, and yet it may receive one third more blood than when it was in a normal condition. A large fatty liver is called a fatty and not a hypertrophied liver. The well developed muscles of the athlete are not over- nourished. If they were, he would probably be unfit to perform his feats of strength and agility. 54 TERMS USED IN THE SYNOPSIS OF The enlarged heart is not over-nourished ; it is as likely to be inadequately fed. The only other instance of hypertrophy is that which occurs in the beginning- of certain varieties of local inflammation when, for a short period, the parts are over-fed owing to an undue activity in the circulation. This may soon be followed by stasis of blood in the capillaries. During the static period there is hypotrophy — diminished nutrition, under-feeding — , and if the stasis per- sist, nutrition ceases. Here then is true atrophy. The part that is no longer nourished dies. This is what is commonly called mortification which is regarded as an unfavorable termination of the inflammatory process. Marasmus, and the ema- ciation which occurs in phthisis pulmonalis or in the course of febrile disorders, such as typhus and typhoid fevers ; in the course of cancerous affections ; in chronic pyelo-nephritis ; and in saccharine diabetes, exemplify hypotrophy. An organ which has decreased in size may be called meiomous.^ Hypertrophy and atrophy are correctly coined, and good words in their proper places. It is only their misuse that is here criticised. The words hypertrophy and atrophy of the * Meiomous, from nEiGoj.ia, a decrease. MORBID STATES & MORBIFIC PROCESSES. 55 kidneys which are employed in the Enghsh no- menclature of diseases in the year 1869 are re- jected in the revision of 1885. The hypertrophy referred to was presumably applied in 1869 to the form of disease now called in the revised edition of 1885 "large white kidney of nephri- tis " which is a condition of auxesis or enlarge- ment. In like manner atrophy was employed in 1869, but to express the opposite condition now known, and classified in the revised edition, as contracted kidney, which is a decreased or mei- omous kidney, a retrograde metamorphosis. It seems clear in both these instances that the word hypertrophy and atrophy, used in 1869 in the case of the kidney, failed to convey an adequate idea, in the minds of the revisers, of the pathic condi- tions in question, or else, in the revision of 1885, they would not have been abandoned. If therefore this interpretation of the omission be correct, why should it not be applied to all cases where the word hyphertrophy is used in the sense of increase in bulk, and atrophy in the sense of diminution ? Auxetic affections may be echmatic as in cer- tain types of enlargement of the prostrate, or may not be echmatic as in uniform enlargement of the prostate which does not impede the flow $6 TERMS USED IN THE SYNOPSIS OF of urine. Some auxetic affections are neoplastic, others are pathengenetic. The words hypertrophy and atrophy will not be employed in this work except when in their true meaning, they are absolutely required. Stenosis* is generally the outcome of inflamma- tory action. Stenotic affections are pathic con- ditions of the excretory ducts and of hollow viscera by which these ducts are narrowed and the viscera lessened in capacity, as in the case of stenosis or stricture of the urethra or in the case of a permanently contracted bladder with mark- edly diminished capacity. A stenotic affection may or may not be echmatic. It is often echmatic in stricture of the urethra, but not in stenosis of the bladder. Stenotic affections are sometimes congenital, sometimes traumatic, but most fre- quently they are pathengenetic,t that is to say are the sequelae, the offspring" of, or are engen- dered by a preexisting morbid condition, as for instance, the strictures which result from ureth- ritis, or the stenosis of the bladder springing from inflammation of that viscus. * Stenosis, from drsruco, to make narrow, to contract. t Pathengenetic, from TtaQo?, a disease, and eyyevrfi, sprung from. (Carroll.) MORBID STATES & MORBIFIC PROCESSES. 5/ Ectasis * is a condition of expansion or dilata- tion of certain serous cavities, hollow viscera, excretory ducts, and lymphatic and blood vessels. Stenotic affections are pathengenetic, and due to inflammatory action, or to obstruction from dis- ease or from the lodgment of a foreign body. Morbid dilation of the bladder, general or local, is an ectatic affection. A so called hydrocele of the tunica vaginalis gives rise to ectasis of the tunica vaginalis. Echmasis f may result from inflammation, from a neoplasm, or from the lodgment of a foreign body. Echmasis is here used in preference to epischesis of which Vogcl makes a class and Cullen an order. Epischesis, from snexsiv, to hold up, to check, to restrain, is defined as a suppres- sion of excretions. Echmasis defines more exactly the character and the cause of the sup- pression of the excretion, as in the case of reten- tion of urine in the bladder, which generally has for its cause a material obstruction in the urinary passage, such as stricture of the urethra or en- largement of the prostrate. Echmatic affections may therefore be also stenotic or auxetic, and * Ectasis, from sk, out, and vEiveiv, to stretch, expand, or extend. t Echmasis, from '^XJJ'0(-i obstruction, obstacle, hinderance. S8 TERMS USED IN THE SYNOPSIS. they may be pathengenetic, that is to say may spring from or be engendered by a preexisting pathic condition. Blastoina "^ should be substituted for granuloma which is a h3^brid word meaning, according to Dunglison, '' a morbid product formed by parti- tion and multiplication of the connective tissue cells into groups of others resembling lymph cells, lying in an intercellular substance, with a tendency to fatty degeneration ; as elephantiasis ifiraecoruni), lupus, etc." The same author de- fines a granule as '' a small grain, a compact par- ticle, a cytoblast." The French name for granu- lation is bourgeon charnu, fleshy bud. Blastoma seems to express the meaning intended to be con- veyed by granuloma, and something more, for the blastomata are now regarded, by many his- tologists, as affections caused by the presence of microorganisms, and on this account also the word blastoma is preferable to granuloma which, besides being an ill-formed word, fails to convey the idea of a germ disease. The term disorder \ is applied to functional af- fections, e. g., disorder of a function, or func- tional disorder. An organ is said to be diseased, * Blastoma, from ftXadroi, shoot, bud, germ, and ca/za. t Disorder, from dis without, and order. PROPER ANATOMICAL TERMS. 59 but a function disordered. Functional disorders are caused by disease of one or of more than one organ of an apparatus. It is often difficult and sometimes impossible to ascertain which of the organs of an apparatus is so diseased as to dis- order the function of that apparatus. Of the six genera of functional disorders enu- merated in the synopsis of morbid states and morbific processes, only four were formerly recognised. It has seemed proper to add de- ficiency (2), which is exemplified by the lessening" of urea in the urine, and suspension (5), which is exemplified by anuria, and also by retention of urine. THE VALUE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF PROPER ANATOMICAL TERMS IN CLASSIFICATION. Certain explanatory comments are now due re- specting this proposal for the establishment of a stable basis for the nomenclature and classifica- tion of diseases in general and of affections of the uro-genital apparatus of the male in particular. In accordance with the definition given of the word disease, parasitic affections ; congenital ab- normities ; the lodgment, in the body, of extrane- ous substances or of poisons ; and injuries ; may, with propriety, be classed among the diseases of 6o PROPER ANATOMICAL TERMS man, for they, also, interrupt or they disturb vital functions. At the same time the word affection may be used as an equivalent term to disease whenever it is found convenient ; for, although an affection does not always imply the existence of an organic morbid condition with structural change, all diseases are affections. For instance man may be affected with a congenital malformation, or an injur}^, as well as with a disease in which there is alteration of structure or impairment of function. Apparatus is used instead of system for the reasons herein given. English speaking authors of high reputation have, for a long time past, made use of the phrase genito-urinary system, although the word system, in this sense, is so obviously inappropri- ate. A critical examination of the subject will not fail to convince the inquirer that system, in this particular sense has been misapplied if he take the pains to consult the standard medical dictionaries. The word system,^ when used in the anatomical sense, signifies an assemblage of organs composed of the same tissues and intended for similar uses, as for instance the nervous system (system of * System, from iv'iTrjfxa, from 'ivviir-qf.n to place together. IN CLASSIFICATION. 6l nerves), the arterial system, the venous system, the lymphatic system, the muscular system, the osseous system, the ligamentous or desmic sys- tem, etc. Systems have general uses, but per- form no functions. They are all contained in apparatuses, to which they yield service. In the nomenclature of diseases prepared by the joint committee appointed by the Royal Col- lege of Physicians of London (1869), system is throughout used instead of apparatus with the exception of the phrase " lacrymal apparatus." The use of the word apparatus in this isolated case would seem to be an inconsistency. The term apparatus being however accepted as the designation of the group of organs by which the tears are secreted and conveyed into the nasal cavity, it is evident that the groups of organs which perform the functions of sight, hearing, smell, taste, respiration, digestion, urination, generation, etc., should be regarded as so many apparatuses. In the first decennial revision (1885) of this same nomenclature, the word system continues to be used for apparatus, except as before, in the case of the lacrymal apparatus. But in the cap- tion which preceeds, the revisers m.ake use of the term apparatus in a singularly inappropriate sense, i. e. " Disorders of the muscular appara- 62 PROPER ANATOMICAL TERMS tus " of the eye. The visual, like the other ap- paratuses of the body, contains parts of several systems ; therefore muscular system of the eye should have been used instead of muscular ap- paratus^ since there is not, in anatomy, any rec- ognition of a muscular apparatus. Again, in this same edition of the London nomenclature, ap- paratus is used where system should have been applied, e. g., " Nervorum apparatus morbid The nervous system yields service to the cephalo- rhachidian and other apparatuses, but there is no nervous apparatus. Another example is in the case of " Diseases of circulatory j^j/^w," latinised into ^^ Sa7iguinis apparatus morbid The circulatory apparatus comprises a system of arterial, of venous, and of lymphatic vessels, with certain reservoirs, and a pump to carry on the circula- tion. Therefore there exists neither a blood ap- paratus nor a circulatory system, but properly a circulatory apparatus. Still another inconsis- tency may be noticed in the case of " Diseases of the respiratory system, '' latinised into " Spiritus organorum morbi,'' and why not here apparatus instead of organs, since the next Latin caption is *' concoctionis apparatus 7?zorbi,'' which is translated into '' Diseases of the digestive system " ? These may perhaps be regarded as fair ex- IN CLASSIFICATION. 6^ amples of the many defects which seriously mar the modern English system of nomenclature. An organ,"^ in anatomical parlance, is a part of the body designed to contribute its share to whatever may be necessary for the completion of a function. An organ may aid in the performance of two or more than two entirely different func- tions. For instance the urethra, while it trans- mits the urine is a urinary organ, and while it transmits the semen it is a genital organ ; and there is no lack of other equally good examples in human anatomy. Therefore an organ performs no function, being simply one of an assemblage of instruments constituting an apparatus, which alone can perform a function, that is to say bring it to its completion. f "■ In the organs of a system of organs there is analogy of structure, while in the organs of an apparatus there is analogy only of function." :|: * Organ, from opyavov, an instrument. t An organ, like a system, yields service to an apparatus ia the performance of its function, or to two or more than two apparatuses. Hence it is rightly said that an organ has its uses, while an apparatus performs its one function. X Dunglison, Littre and Robin, and Dechambre, Duval and LerebouUet. 64 PROPER ANATOMICAL TERMS All apparahis^ of the human body is an as- semblage of organs which work toward the same end or, in other words, v/hich concur in a common function, though they be of different nature. An apparatus then comprises organs of differing anatomical constitution. An apparatus may be composed of, or may contain, several other ap- paratuses. For instance, the primary human ap- paratus consists of five secondary apparatuses which contain sixteen subsidiary apparatuses. The secondary apparatuses of the body are : (I,) the cephalo-rhachidian apparatus, containing the subsidiary apparatuses,(i ,) of vision — including (2,) the lacrymal apparatus — , (3,) of audition, (4,) of olfaction, and (5,) of gustation ; (II,) the nutri- tive apparatus containing the subsidiary appara- tuses, (6,) of mastication, (7,) of deglutition, (8,) of digestion, (9,) of absorption, (10,) of circula- tion, (11,) of respiration,'!' — containing (12,) the apparatus of phonation — , (13,) of urination, and (14,) of defecation; (III,) the motory apparatus ; (IV,) the cutaneous apparatus, containing (15,) * Apparatus, from the prefix ad, and parare, paratutn, to prepare. t The respiratory apparatus contains, but is subsidiary to, the phonetic apparatus which is subsidiary to the cephalo- rhachidian apparatus. IN CLASSIFICATION. 65 the apparatus of touch,* and (16,) the apparatus of transpiration ; f and (V,) the apparatus of generation. The secondar}^ apparatus of generation and the subsidiary apparatus of urination bear such close anatomical relations to each other that, for clin- ical purposes, they should be united under the name of the uro-genital apparatus. Parts of several systems are included in an ap- paratus as, for instance, nerves, vessels, glands, muscles, bones, cartilages, ligaments, connective tissue, mucous membranes, etc. Each apparatus accomplishes only one function, while each organ of that apparatus may have several uses. There is no apparatus but performs a function, and there is no function without an apparatus (Robin), man himself being a grand primary apparatus destined to perform only one function.:]: * The tactile apparatus is subsidiary to the cephalo-rhachi- dian apparatus. t The transpiratory apparatus is subsidiary to the nutritive apparatus. I Inasmuch as the views above expressed have been charac- terized as allied to positivism, it is proper that some notice be here taken of this assertion. The subject under consideration js man's body, not his soul ; his anatomy, not his psychology. Anatomy, in all its branches, teaches nothing contrary to be- lief in an Almighty God Creator of all things. A firm believer 66 PROPER ANATOMICAL TERMS The primary apparatus man then, consists of an assemblage of secondary apparatuses ; a sec- ondary apparatus consists of an assemblage of subsidiary apparatuses ; and a subsidiary appara- tus consists of an assemblage of organs and ot parts of systems. A function "^ is the act accomplished, not by an organ or a system of organs, but by an appara- tus which, as already stated, consists of an as- semblage of differing organs. Therefore the use of the word function should be restricted to the act of an apparatus. If the following comparison be allowable, the human apparatus may be likened to a grand orchestra consisting of many differing musical in- struments and of men to perform thereon. The function of each performer and his instrument being music. In this case each instrument is passive until it is played upon, when it becomes in God, who masters anatomy discovers therein nothing to disturb his creed. Anatomy can deal with only what is finite in man ; but with the infinite part of man, that which is God- like, it can have nothing to do, and on this immortal part of man, it can have nothing to say worth hearing, nor is it ever likely to shake the faith that is once well implanted in any mind. * Function, ftmctio from fimgt, fuftctus, to act, to per- form. IN CLASSIFICATION. 6/ a secondary apparatus, and a collection of such secondary apparatuses constitutes the grand orchestra or primary apparatus whose function is JLarvio7iioiis music. Doctor Meredith Clymer defines " a function as the sum of the automatic activities of the or- gans which go to make up an apparatus, and says ; an organ * yields service to an apparatus, but it can only do this by being put into act, and that act must be the result of an autonomous, in- hering property, a potentiality, set free by a lib- crating force. The product is an activity or func- tion. An organ can yield no service in a passive state. It must be in an active state, and it cannot do or be active without a transformation of po- tential mto kinetic energy by the liberation of energy.* " Doctor Clymer is known to be a close reasoner and to be convincing by his sound arguments, therefore it is not easy to venture upon anything like opposition to the views he so lucidly puts forth ; nevertheless an attempt will be made to find therein a possible flaw. The "activities" of organs are unquestioned,, but if each of these organs be isolated, its activ- ity is insufficient to constitute a function in a * From a written communication. 68 PROPER ANATOMICAL TERMS physiological point of view. The organ must have the concurrence of other organs, or the function cannot be completed, in other words, the function can be performed only by an as- semblage of organs of differing anatomical prop- erties. Each organ contributing its share of activity toward the elaboration and completion of the function. To this assemblage of differing organs, the name of apparatus has been given, and the apparatus performs the function which is the terminal act. The Doctor's definition of function is excellent and is in harmony with the views contained in this work, but does not precisely agree with what follows, for if the '' automatic activities " of certain organs go to make up the function of an apparatus, which is it that performs the func- tion ? Is it each organ or every organ ? Is it not all the organs together, of the apparatus, rather than each organ separately? If each organ separately, then an assemblage of organs, consti- tuting an apparatus, would perform as many functions as there are in it organs. But the con- trary is known to be the case in physiology. For instance, the function digestion is " the sum of the automatic activities " of the organs which constitute the digestive apparatus. The function motion is " the sum of the automatic activities ' IN CLASSIFICATION. 69 of the organs which constitute the motory ap- paratus, etc. Littre and Robin define the fujiction of an ap- paratus (in anatomy) as the special act whicli each apparatus executes, and define the uses of organs, as the acts executed by each organ. One and the same organ having several uses, while an apparatus performs only one function. '^ One and the same muscle may aid in the flexion and rotation of a limb. The jaw is used in mastica- tion and in phonation, etc. The word use should not be confounded with the word /miction which has an entirely different signification.""^ The difificulty arising from the employment of these terms does not lie in the interpretation of the acts themselves, but in language, in the modes of denoting and of differentiating the several acts. It is to be hoped that a suitable word, other than use or function, will be found to express a corect idea of the activity of an organ. The word function however seems w^ell adapted to denote the act of an apparatus. Its use should be so restricted. Therefore, until a better word is suggested, the term function \vill * Dictionnaire de Medicine, de Chirurgie, etc. D'apres le plan suivi par Nysten. Douzieme edition. Par E. Littre et Ch. Robin, Paris, 1865. 70 PROPER ANATOMICAL TERMS be used, in this work, in connection with the act of an apparatus. May not the word faculty be applied to the activity of an organ, as for example, the gly- cogenic faculty of the liver ? Crabb defines " a faculty as a specific power which is directed to one single object ; it is the power of acting according to a given form." Lewes, in commenting upon faculty and func- tion, says : " ... By faculty is commonly under- stood the power or aptitude of an agent to per- form a certain action or class of actions. It is thus synonymous with function, which means the activity of an organ, the uses of the instrument. I propose to detatch faculty from this general signification, limiting it to the action or class of actions into which a function may be diversified by the education of experience. That is to say, let function stand for the native endowment of an organ, and faculty for its acquired variation of activity." * If the word faculty be used to denote the act, the use, the aptitude, of an organ, it should not be detatched from its general signification and should " stand for the native endowment of an * Problems of Life and Mind. By George Henry Lewes. American edition. Boston, 1879, p. 27. IN CLASSIFICATION. 7I organ," and function should be restricted to the act of an apparatus. One of the conclusions drawn from the forego- ing considerations is that there is no urinary systein. The kidneys are the uropoietic organs of the urinary apparatus ; they secrete the ma- terials which enter into the composition of the urine ; in them the urine is concocted and is then transmitted by their excretory ducts to its proper reservoir. The urinary organs are the kidneys ; their excretory ducts, the ureters ; and the grand reservoir of the urine, the bladder. These organs, together with the urethra and the prostate, con- stitute the urinary apparatus. It is by means of this apparatus that the function of elimination, from the body, of certain effete substances, is brought to its completion. Another conclusion is that there is no geni- tal system. The testicles are simply the spermo- poietic organs of the genital apparatus. The genital organs are the testicles ; the deferential canals ; and the seminal vesicles ; these organs together with the urethra, the prostate, and the penis, constitute the genital apparatus by which the function of generation is accomplished under proper conditions. The uro-gemtal apparatus comprises the urin- ary apparatus and the genital apparatus. 72 PROPER ANATOMICAL TERMS. The organs of the urinary apparatus and those of the genital apparatus are so intimately asso- ciated and so interdependent that they must act in perfect harmony or the double apparatus is affected in a greater or less degree. Diseases of any of the urinary organs cause some derange- ment of the others and disturb the genital organs and often the whole organism. SECTION II. Human Nosography. A summary of the progress of nosography since its founda- tion. The scope of nosography. Notice of Sauvages. A consense of views necessary in methodical arrangement. Synopses of Sauvages', CuUen's, Parr's, Good's and Delorme's arrangements of diseases. Comments on these several systems. Cullen's rules for distinguishing genera, species, and varieties of diseases. Parr's rules. Some of the aphorisms relating to classification, extracted principally from the philosophia botanica of Linnaeus, by Doctor Thomas Young. ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF NOSOGRAPHY. An outline of the development of nosography may, with advantage, be traced from its founda- tion to the present time, and be followed by a brief commentary upon the methods employed by some of the nosographers of the last and of this century. Nosography is in reality the science of medi- cine and therapy is its art. Nosography in- cludes the description, the definition, the nomen- clature, and the classification of diseases. A knowledge of the several branches of anatomy is the essential preliminary to the study of noso- 74 ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF NOSOGRAPHY. graphy. The physician who is thoroughly acquainted with this science is a master of the natural history of diseases. The training neces- sary to its acquirement gives him a precision in diagnosis, and a degree of wisdom in prognosis and of skill in therapy, to which otherwise he could never attain. The word nosography* is of comparatively modern application. It was not in use among the ancient physicians. f Although the study of the history of diseases began Avith the founder of medical art and was faithfully continued by his successors, no attempt at their classihcation seems to have been made until about the close of the sixteenth century. Andreo Cesalpino, J the Italian physician and naturalist, was probably the first to suggest the methodical arrangement of * Nosography, from vodo's, disease, and ypdgjeiv, to de- scribe. t The works of the ancient authors, such as Hippocrates, Galen, Celsus, and others, contain no synopses of classifica- tion, but their description of diseases is often very accurate and- much of their nomenclature is still in use. Although the Arabian physicians were close followers of the doctrines of Aristotle, nothing that can be called a methodical classifica- tion of diseases has been found in their treatises. \ Cesalpino was born at Arezzo in the year 15 19 and died in 1603. ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF NOSOGRAPHY. 75 diseases. This however was not attempted until the beginning of the seventeenth century when, in 1602, Felix Platerus, of Basle, published, in his ^^ Praxeos Medicae,'' the plan of a nosographical method, but went no farther. Among other con- tributions were, the '' Nosologia'' of Warenius of Leipsic, 1605; the ^^ Nosologia Harmonica, Dog- fnatiga, et Hermetica'' of Petraeus of Marburg, 1614; the ^^ Idea Universalis Medicinae, of John- stonus of Amsterdam, published in 1644, with a section devoted to classification, wherein are arranged all diseases into three classes, divided into internal and external diseases ; and finally, in 1675, the '' Nosologia'' of Schoenfeld. All these essays were incomplete and of little use except that they were the forerunners of the good work which was subsequentl}^ performed. Such was the extent of the progress of nosography, which then stood still for half a century. Sydenham and Baglivius,* who wrote toward the end of the seventeenth century, were of opinion that diseases should be classified, like systems of botany, by genera and species with characteristic definitions. Other physicians of their time were of the same opinion (CuUen). It appears, how- * Georgii Baglivi, De Praxi Medica, etc., Lugduni Batavo- rum, 1700. ^6 ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF NOSOGRAPHY. ever, that this was not attempted until the year 1732, when Frangois Boissier de Sauvages of Montpellier published an essay with the title of ** Nouvelles Classes de Maladies Disposees dans un Ordre semblable a celui des Botanistes.'' From this preliminary essay he built up his " Nosologia Methodica' which he did not publish until 1760, after nearly thirty years of diligent labor. Men- tion should also be made of the nosographical contribution of Hebenstreit of Leipsic, 1754. But Sauvages was really the founder of method- ical nosography to which he gave the greatest impulse. He was followed by Linnaeus, Vogel, CuUen, Sagar, Macbride, Vitet, Darwin, Selle, Pinel, Baumes, Tourdes, Tourtelle, Recamier, Crichton, Parr, Swediaur, Young, Richerand, Good, Alibert, Hosack, and others who, in some instances, subtracted from, or added to, without materially changing, his great plan the frame- work of which they all retained while they made very little change in his nomenclature, much of which is still in use. Sauvages was a man of brilliant mind and ex- traordinary industry. He had been prepared for his task of founding the science of nosography by a broad and liberal education. He had studied and taught botany, and his tastes brought him into close relations with the renowned Linnaeus. ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF NOSOGRAPHY. ^J He had for counselor the illustrious Boerhaave, from whom he received much encouragement in the prosecution of his difficult and arduous la- bors. He cheerfully accepted, and profited by, the criticisms of his contemporaries, and lived to complete, but not to see in print, the last revision of his gigantic work which was not published until a year after his death. Sauvages had en- tered the medical profession at an early age, and had passed a little over one year in Paris where he gathered the material for an essay upon fevers. His first nosographical essay was pub- lished in 1732. He then wrote upon inflamma- tion, upon capillary vessels, upon hemiplegia, and upon rabies. He wrote also a physiological conspectus which was published at Lyons in 1751 ; upon a theory of the circulation of the blood ; upon the effects of medicaments ; upon embryology ; upon tumors ; muscular move- ments ; elements of physiology ; difficult respira- tion ; vision ; a theory of convulsions ; method- ical pathology ; and finally came his Nosologia Methodica. This was the crowning work, for after- wards only a few dissertations appeared from his fertile pen, and he died, full of honors, on Febru- ary 19th, 1767, at the age of sixty-one, after an illness of two years duration. To exemplify the estimation in which this 78 ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF NOSOGRAPHY. truly great physician was held, the following is quoted from Good's Physiological system of Nosology 1823. " The Nosologia Methodica, for such is the title of Mr. de Sauvages' work, is indeed, an Herculean labour. It consists, in its latest and most perfect form, of three distinct arrangements — a symptomatical, an aetiological, and an ana- tomical ; so as to accommodate itself to the taste of the old school as well as of the new. The symptomatical, to which the others are pro- fessedly subordinate, is by far the most extens- ively elucidated ; and comprises ten classes, (each introduced by an elaborate pathological synop- sis), upwards of forty orders, more than three hundred genera, and an almost innumerable host of species We have yet, however, to add the varieties, which under several species are not few ; and to bear in mind that to every variety, species and genus, as far as their relative charac- ters will allow, are allotted a definition, list of synonyms, history, diagnosis, prognosis, and mode of cure ; with, frequently, an exemplifica- tion of cases, and a brief statement of the peculiar opinions of other writers, before we can fairly appreciate the entire mass of matter with which the volumes of Mr. de Sauvages abound. He seems, indeed, to have been desirous of collecting ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF NOSOGRAPHY. 79 materials of every kind and quality from every quarter to which a market was open ; and of fol- lowing up every deviation from health into all its possible as well as its actual shades and rami- fications " The followers of Sauvages, from Linnaeus to Hosack were all men of much general and scien- tific culture. None of these eminent men was better endowed with those requisite qualities than the celebrated Cullen, who in the edition of his works prepared in 1827 by Doctor John Thomson, paraphrases an aphorism of the illus- trious Aristotle as follows : " Perfect division and definition is the summit of human knowledge in every part of science, and requires not only the clearest but the most comprehensive views, such as, with respect to diseases, we can arrive at only by often-repeated exercises and much study." Cullen further says, " The attempt may at first appear uncouth and difficult, but by repetition it will become more familiar and easy, and 3"ou must be content to make such a progress. When a little more than thirty years ago, I first got a sight of the botanical system of Linnaeus, it ap- peared to me to be a piece of the most uncouth jargon and minute pedantry ; but, by length of time, it is now as familiar to me as my mother 8o A CONSENSE OF VIEWS NECESSARY tongue ; and with whatever difficulty it was first received in most parts of Europe, it has now sur- mounted these, and its utility has reconciled every person to the study of it." A CONSENSE OF VIEWS NECESSARY IN METHODICAL ARRANGEMENT. The earliest medical authors realised the im- portance of arrangement* in the elucidation of their teachings, but formed no concerted plan. The effect of this lack of common agreement was the adoption of many differing methods. Most of these early writers divided their works into parts, books, chapters, and sections. Some of them adopted the synoptic, and others the sys- tematic method. Later the method of the bota- nists was adopted ; and the arrangement of dis- eases into classes, orders, genera and species, has, ever since, been used by the systematic writers. The systematic method has been variously modi- fied : (i,) by the adoption of an alphabetical ar- rangement of diseases ; (2,) by the arrangement * " Without arrangement, no art or science can be acquired, for in its absence none can be treated of or communicated." (J. M. Good.) IN METHODICAL ARRANGEMENT. 8 1 of diseases, in accordance with their duration, into acute and chronic diseases ; (3,) by the arrangement of diseases in accordance with the anatomical regions of the body, such as the head, the trunk, and the extremities ; (4,) by the arrangement of diseases in accordance with their aetiology ; (5,) by the arrangement of dis- eases in accordance w^ith the sex and age of the patients ; and (6,) by the arrangement of dis- eases in accordance with their symptoms. The last named arrangement having been suggested by Platerus and first effected by Sauvages. In order to convey to the mind a correct idea of the arrangement adopted by the nosographers of the past, a synopsis of the classes of the most prominent among them is introduced. But the synopses of Sauvages, CuUen, Parr, Good, and Delorme, are given entire to enable the student to conveniently examine and compare these several systems. Sauvages' system (i 732-1 767), representing the beginning of the science ; Cul- len's system (i 769-1 790), showing the progress made up to his time ; Parr's system (1809), ex- hibiting a marked change, not however for the better, in classification, while the nomenclature is little changed ; Good's system (1822), showing a very great improvement in classification though not in nomenclature ; and Raige-Delorme's sys- 82 NOMENCLATURE OF HIPPOCRATES. sytem (1841), being a fair specimen of the de- cline of nosographj in France. As it may be useful to students of nosography to have before them some ol the most ancient terms used in medicine, a part of the nomen- clature of Hippocrates is here inserted in order that they may see at a glance those ancient words which are retained in the existing medical nomen- clature. ALPHABETICAL LIST OF DISEASES UPON WHICH HIPPOCRATES HAS WRITTEN, BEING A FAIR EXEMPLIFICATION OF HIS NOMENCLATURE.* 1 Abscesses 2 Achores 3 Alopecia 4 Anasarca 5 Anchylosis 6 Anus, inflamed 7 " hard tubercles of or near the 8 Appetite, canine 9 " , loss of * From Motherby's Medical Dictionary. Third edition, London. 1791. NOMENCLATURE OF HIPPOCRATES. 83 10 Aphthae 11 Apolepsis 12 Apoplexy 13 Arms, shortness of the 14 Ascarides 15 Asthma 16 Auante 17 Baldness 18 Barrenness 19 Biles 20 Bladder, tubercles in the 21 Blood, spitting of 22 " , vomiting 23 Blotches, red on the legs, from sitting by the fire 24 Brain, concussion of the 25 '' , ruptured vessels in the 26 Breath, foetid 27 '* , straightness of the 28 Buboes 29 Carbuncle 30 Catamenia : disordered, natural 31 Catoche 32 Cancers 33 Carus 34 Cataphora 35 Cachexy 36 Catarrh 84 NOMENCLATURE OF HIPPOCRATES. 37 Caries 38 Cheek, a sphacelous of the 39 Chilblains 40 Cholera morbus 41 Chalk stones in the joints 42 Cough 43 Coryza 44 Coma 45 *' vigil 46 Contractions of the fibres 47 Consumption, of the whole body 48 '* , ischiadic 49 *' , nephritic 50 Colour, bad 51 Crookedness 52 Deafness 53 Delirium 54 Defluxion or rheum 55 Diarrhoea 56 Dreams, frightful 57 Dumbness 58 Dysentery 59 Dyspnoea 60 Dysury 61 Ears, pains in the 62 " , redundant moisture in the 63 " , ringing in the 64 " , tubercles about the NOMENCLATURE OF HIPPOCRATES. 8$ 65 Ecchymosis from contusion 66 Empyema 6y Emprosthotonos 68 Epilepsy 69 " , in children 70 Epinyctides 71 Erysipelas 72 Eruption on the skin 73 Evil 74 Eye, distortion of the 75 " , bleared y6 '' , dry-bleared yy " , clouds in the 78 " , cicatrices in the 79 "■ , pearls in the 80 '* , white spots in the 81 *' , ruptured S2 " , exulcerated 83 " , inflamed 84 '' , dry inflammation of the 85 Eye-lids, excressences on the 86 " , tumid outward -87 " , coalesence of the B8 '' , scabby Sg " J tumors on the 90 Face, hard tubercles on the 91 Favi 92 Fainting 86 NOMENCLATURE OF HIPPOCRATES. 93 Fevers 94 Fistulas 95 Fractures 96 Freckles 97 Gangrene 98 Glaucoma 99 Green sickness 00 Griping of the intestines 01 Gout 02 Gonorrhoea benigna 03 Gums, black 04 '' , pains in the, from teething 05 " , tubercles on the 06 Haemorrhages 07 Haemorrhoids 08 Hearing, dull 09 Heartburn 10 Head, heaviness of the 11 " , ache 12 '^ , scurvy 13 Herpes 14 Hesitation 15 Hiccough 16 Horror 17 Hoarseness 18 Humors, discharge of morbid 19 Hysterics 20 Hypersarcosis NOMENCLATURE OF HIPPOCRATES. 8/ 121 Jaundice 122 Illiac passion 123 Impotence 124 Inflammation: external, internal 125 Itch 126 Itching 127 '' , a pungent, in the mouth 128 Kidnies, disorders of the 129 Labour, difficult 130 Leprosy 131 " , the white 132 Lethargy 133 Leucophlegmatia 134 Lientery 135 Lips, fissures in the 136 Limping 137 Liver, inflamed 138 Lochia, disordered 139 Lungs, spasmodically contracted 140 '' , varix in the 141 " , suppurated 142 " , crude tubercles in the 143 Luxations 144 Madness 145 Melancholy 146 Mind, alienation of the 147 " , alienation through melancholy 148 Miscarriage 88 NOMENCLATURE OF HIPPOCRATES. 149 Mole 150 Mouth, distorted 151 Nauseating food 152 Navel, inflamed 153 Neck, a hard tumor in the 154 Nose, a discharge of pus in the 155 Nocturnal pollutions 156 Nyctalops 157 Opisthotonos 158 Orthopnea 159 Pain, in the loins 160 Palpitation 161 Peripneumony 162 Phlj'ctaenae 163 Phrenitis 164 Phrontis 165 Placenta, adhering 166 Plague 167 Pleurisy 168 " , a dry 169 " , a moist 170 Polypus, in the nose 171 Pterygion 172 Pustules, from acrid sweat 173 Pudenda, excressences of the 174 " , putrefaction of the 175 Pupil of the eye, too small or angular 176 '' " " " , exulcerated NOMENCLATURE OF HIPPOCRATES. 89 177 Pupil of the eye, cicatrix of the 178 " *' " '' , spoiled 179 '* " '* " , removed from its natural situation i8o *' " ** " , prominent 181 Quinsey, affecting the lungs 182 Restlessness 183 Rheum, a defluxion of 184 Ruptures 185 Salivation, a spontaneous 186 Sciatica 187 Scurvy 188 Sensation, suddenly lost 189 Shivering 190 Sight, a privation of 191 Skin, desquamations of the 192 Speech, too volatile 193 Spleen, swelled 194 ** , inflamed 195 Spine, distorted forwards 196 Sprains 197 Sphacelus 198 Stertor 199 Strangury :2oo Stone 201 Stupidity 202 Stammering 203 Superfetation 90 NOMENCLATURE OF HIPPOCRATES. 204 Tabes dorsalis 205 Teeth, stupor of the 206 " , gnashing and grinding of the 207 " , ache 208 " , of both jaws fixed together 209 Tetanus 210 Tetters 211 Testicles, swelled 212 Tenesmus 213 Terminthi 214 Tonsils, disorders of the 215 " , swelled 216 Torpidness of the body 217 Tongue, fissured 218 " , tumor under the 219 Trichosis 220 Tubercles of various sorts 221 Tumors 222 Uvula, relaxed 223 " , retracted 224 " , putrefied 225 Uterus, disorders of the 226 " , fallmg down of the 227 Ulcers 228 Urine, retained 229 Urethra, caruncles or tubercles in the 230 Voice, loss of the 231 Varices SAUVAGES' SYSTEM. 9I 232 Vertigo 233 Warts 234 Worms 235 Whitlow 236 Wry neck 237 Wounds 238 White flux 339 Yawning SYNOPSIS OF THE CLASSES, ORDERS, AND GENERA OF SAUVAGES' SYSTEM. CLASSIS 1. VITIA. Ordo I. Maculae. Genus i. Leucoma. 2. Vitiligo. 3. Ephelis. 4. Gutta rosea. 5. Naevus. 6. Ecchymoma. Ordo II. Efflorescentiae. Genus 7. Herpes. " 8. Epinyctis. " 9. Psydracia. '' 10. Hidroa. 92 SYNOPSIS OF Ordo III. Phymata. Genus II. Erythema. n 12. Oedema. ti 13. Emphysema. il 14. Scirrhus. <( 15. Phlegmone. « 16. Bubo. (< 17. Parotis. il 18. Furunculus. fi 19. Anthrax. it 20. Cancer. n 21. Paronychia. tl 22. Phimosis. Ordo IV. Excrescenti Genus 23. Sarcoma. << 24. Condyloma. (( 25. Verruca. <( 26. Pterygium. 11 27. Hordeolum. a 28. Bronchocele. << 29. Exostosis. (( 30. Gibbositas. (( 31- Lordosis. Ordo V. Cystides. Genus 32. Aneurysma. " 33. Varix. SAUVAGES* SYSTEM. 93 Genus 34. Hydatis. <( 35. Marisca. (( 36. Staphyloma. <( 37- Lupia. << 38. Hydrarthrus. it 39- Apostema. it 40. Exomphalus. (( 41. Oscheocele. OrDO VI. ECTOPIAE Genus 42. Exophthalmia. << 43. Blepharoptosis. 148. Pleurodyne. (( 149. Rheuma. a 150. Hydrothorax. 151. Empyema. CLASSIS VI. DEBILITATES. Ordo I. Dysaesthesiae. Genus 152. Cataracta. " 153. Caligo. " 154. Amblyopia " 155. Amaurosis. *' 156. Anosmia. " 157. Agheustia. " 158. Dysecoea. « 159- Paracusis. " 160. Cophosis. " 161. Anaesthesia. SAUVAGES SYSTEM. 99 Ordo II. Anepithymiae. Genus 162. Anorexia. Adipsia. Anaphrodisia. Ordo III. Dyscinesiae. Genus 16^. Mutitas. Aphonia. Psellismus. Paraphonia. Paralysis. Hemiplegia. Paraplegia. Ordo IV. Leipopsychiae. Genus 172. Asthenia. Leipothemia. Syncope. Asphyxia. Ordo V. Comata. 163. 164. 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172. 173- 174. 175. Genus 176. Catalepsis. 177. Ecstasis. 178. Typhomania. 179. Lethargus. 180. Cataphora. 181. Carus. 182.- Apoplexia. lOO SYNOPSIS OF CLASSIS VII. DOLORES. Ordo I. Vagi Geuus 183. Arthritis. u 184. Ostocopus. l( 185. Rheumatismus. << 186. Catarrh us. n 187. Anxietas. <( 188. Lassitudo. <( 189. Stupor. a 190. Pruritus. (( 191. Algor. ' (( 192. Ardor. Ordo II. Capit Genus 193. Cephalalgia. ^^. I. CJ. Incarnans, (Simple healing ulcer.) " 2. '* Vitiosum, (Depraved ulcer.) " 3. " Sinuosum, (Sinuous ulcer.) " 4. " Tuberculosum, (Warty, excrescent ulcer.) ** 5. " Cariosum, (Carious ulcer.) 148 good's table of classification. CLASS. IV. NEUROTICA, Diseases of the nervous function. Ord. I. Phrenica, Affecting the intellect. Gen. I. Ecphronia^ Insanity, Craziness. Spec, I. E. Melancholia, (Melancholy.) " 2. *' Mania, (Madness.) Gen. II, Empathema, Ungovernable passion. Spec. I. E. Entonicum, (Empassioned excite- ment.) ** 2. '* Atonicum, (Empassioned depres- sion.) " 3. *' Inane, (Hair-brained passion.) Gen. III. Alusia, Illusion, Hallucination. Spec. I. A. Elatio, (Sentimentalism, Mental ex- extravagance.) " 2. " Hypochondrias, (Hypochondrism, Low spirits.) good's table of classification. 149 Gen. IV. Aphelxia, Revery. Spec. I. A. Socors, (Abscence of mind.) " 2. •* Intenta, (Abstraction of mind.) " 3. " Otiosa, (Brown-study.) Gen. V. Paroniria, Sleep-disturbance. Spec. I. P. Ambulans, (Sleep-walking.) " 2. '* Loquens, (Sleep-talking.) " 3. " Salax, (Night-pollution.) Gen. VI. Moria, Fatuity. Spec. I. M. Imbecillis, (Imbecility.) " 2. " Demens, (Irrationality.) Ord. II. Aesthetica, Affecting the sensation. Gen. I. Par op sis, Morbid sight. Spec, I. P. Lucifuga, (Night-sight.) " 2. " Noctifuga, (Day-sight.) " 3. " Longinqua, (Long-sight.) ISO good's table of classification. ^ec ■ 4. 5. 6. 7- 8. 9- 10. II. 12. 13- P. Propinqua, (Short-sight.) " Lateralis, (Skue-sight.) " Illusoria, (False-sight.) " Caligo, (Opaque cornea.) " Glaucosis, (Humoral opacity.) " Catarracta, (Cataract.) " Synizesis, (Closed pupil.) ** Amaurosis, (Drop serene.) " Staphyloma, (Protuberant eye.) "■ Strabismus, (Squinting.) Spec. I. 2. 3- 4- 5. 6. (7^?;. //. Paracusis^ Morbid hearing. P. Acris, (Acute hearing.) " Obtusa, (Hardness of hearing.) " Perversa, (Perverse hearing.) " Duplicata, (Double hearing.) " Illusoria, (Imaginary sounds.) " Surditas, (Deafness.) Gen. III. ParosmiSf Morbid smell. Spec. I. P. Acris, (Acute smell.) ** 2. " Obtusa, (Obtuse smell.) " 3. " Expers, (Want of smell.) good's table of classification. 151 Gen, IV. Parageusis, Morbid taste. Spec. I. P. Acuta, (Acute taste.) *' 2. " Obtusa, (Obtuse taste.) " 3. " Expers, (Want of taste.) Gen. V. Par apsis, Morbid touch. Spec. I. P. Acris, (Acute sense of touch or gen- eral feeling.) " 2. " Expers, (Insensibility of touch or general feeling.) " 3. '* Illusoria, (Illusory sense of touch or general feeling.) Gen. VI. Neuralgia, Nerve-ache. Spec. I. N. Faciei, (Nerve-ache of the face.) " 2. •' Pedis, (Nerve-ache of the foot.) " 3. " Mammae, (Nerve-ache of the breast.) 152 good's table of classification. spec. I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 OrD. III. CiNETICA, Affecting the muscles. Gen. I. Entasia, Constrictive spasm. E. Priapismus, (Priapism.) "■ Loxia, (Wry-neck.) " Articularis, (Muscular stiff-joint.) " Systremma, (Cramp.) " Trismus, (Locked-jaw.) " Tetanus, (Tetanus.) " Lissa, (Rabies, Canine madness.) " Acrotismus, (Suppressed pulse.) Gen. II. Clonus y Clonic spasm. Spec, I. C. Singultus, (Hiccough.) " 2. '' Sternutatio, (Sneezing.) ' Palpitatio, (Palpitation.) * Nictitatio, (Twinkling of the eye lids.) ' Subsultus, (Twitching of the ten dons.) * Pandiculatio, (Stretching.) 3- 4- 5. 6. spec. I. (< 2. << 3- <( 4. <( 5. good's table of classification. 153 Gen. HI. Sync I onus, Synclonic spasm. S. Tremor, (Trembling.) '' Chorea, (St. Vitus' dance.) " Ballismus, (Shaking palsy.) '* Raphania, (Raphania.) " Beriberia, (Barbiers.) Ord. IV. Systatica, Affecting several or all the sensorial powers simultaneously. Gen, /, Agrypnia^ Sleeplessness. Spec. I. A. Excitata, (Irritative wakefulness.) " 2. " Pertaesa, (Chronic wakefulness.) Gen. II. Dysphoria, Restlessnes. Spec. I. D. Simplex, (Fidgets.) " 2. " Anxietas, (Anxiety.) Gen. Ill Antipathia, Antipathy. Spec. I. A. Sensilis, (Sensile antipathy.) 2. '' Insensilis, (Insensile antipathy.) 154 good's table of classification. Gen. IV. Cephalaea^ Head-ache. Spec. I. C. Gravans, (Stupid head-ache.) 2. " Ecstasis, (Ecstasy.) 3. " Catalepsia, (Catalepsy.) 4. " Lethargus, (Lethargy.) 5. '' Apoplexia, (Apoplexy.) 6. " Paralysis, (Palsy.) CLASS. V. GENETICA, Diseases of the sexual function. Ord. L Cenotica, Affecting the fluids. Gen. /. Paramenia J Mismenstruation. Spec. I. P. Obstructionis, (Obstructed menstrua- tion.) " 2. " Difficilis, (Laborious mentruation.) " 3. " Superflua, (Excessive menstruation.) " 4. " Erroris, (Vicarious menstruation.) " 5. " Cessatronis, (Irregular cessation of the menses.) GOOD S TABLE OF CLASSIFICATION. 1 55 Genus II. Leucorrhoea, Whites. Spec. I. L. Communis, (Common whites.) " 2. ** Nabothi, (Labour-show.) " 3. *' Senescentium, (Whites of advanced life.) Gen, III. Blennorrhoea^ Gonorrhoea. Spec. I. B. Simplex, (Simple urethral running.) " 2. " Luodes, (Clap.) " 3. ** Chronica, (Gleet.) Gen. IV. Spermorrhoea^ Seminal flux. Spec. I. S. Entonica, (Entonic seminal flux.) " 2. " Atonica, (Atonic seminal flux.) Gen. V. GalactiUy Mislactation. Spec. I. G. Praematura, (Premature milk-flow.) ** 2. " Defectiva, (Deficient milk-flow.) *' 3. " Depravata, (Depraved milk-flow.) " 4 " Erratica, (Erratic milk-flow.) " 5. '* Virorum, (Milk-flow in males.) 156 good's table of classification. Ord. II. Orgastica, AiEfecting the org-asm. Gen. I. Chlorosis. Green-sickness. Spec. I. C. Entonica, (Entonic green-sickness.) " 2. " Atonica, (Atonic green-sickness.) Gen. IT. Proeotia. Genital precocity. Spec. I. P. Masculina, (Male precocity.) " 2. " Feminina, (Female precocity.) Gen. III. LagnesiSy Lust. Spec. I. L. Salacitas, (Salacity.) " 2. " Furor, (Lascivious madness.) Gen. IV. Agenesiuy C Male sterility. Spec. I. A. Impotens, (Male impotency.) " 2. '* Dyspermia, (Seminal-mis-emission.) " 3. *' Incongrua, (Copulative incongruity.) good's table of classification. 157 Gen, V. Aphoria, Female sterility, Barrenness. Spec, I. A. Impotens, (Barrenness of impotency.) " 2. *' Paramenica, (Barrenness of mis-men- struation.) " 3. "■ Impercita, (Barrenness of irrespon- dence.) " 4. ** Incongrua, (Barrenness of incon- gruity.) Gen. VI. Aedoptosis^ Genital prolapse. Spec. I. A. Uteri, (Falling down of the womb.) " 2. " Vaginae, (Prolapse of the vagina.) " 3. " Vesicae, (Prolapse of the bladder.) " 4. " Complicata, (Complicated genital prolapse.) " 5. " Polyposa, (Genital excrescence.) Ord. III. Carpotica, Affecting the impregnation. Gen. I. ParacyesiSy Morbid pregnancy. Spec. I. P. Irritativa, (Constitutional derange- ment of pregnancy.) 158 good's table of classification. Sp€c. 2. " Uterina, (Local derangement of pregnancy.) " 3. "■ Abortus, (Abortion.) Gen. II. Parodynia^ Morbid labour. P. Atonica, (Atonic labour.) " Implastica, (Unpliant labour.) '* Sympathetica, (Complicated labour.) *' Perversa, (Preternatural presenta- tion.) " Amorphica, (Impracticable labour.) " Pluralis, (Multiplicate labour.) " 7. " Secundaria, (Sequential labour.) Gen. III. Eccyesis, Extra-uterine-fetation. Sj)ec. I. E. Ovaria, (Ovarian exfetation.) ^' 2. '* Tubalis, (Tubal exfetation.) " 3. *' Abdominalis, (Abdominal exfetation.) Ge7t. IV. Pseudocyesis, Spurious pregnancy. Spec. I. P. Molaris, (Mole.) " 2. *' Inanis, (False conception.) •yec. I. << 2. << 3. << 4. <( 5. <4 6. good's table of classification. 159 CLASS. VI. ECCRITICA, Diseases of the excernent function. Ord. I. Mesotica, Affecting the parenchyma. Gen. I. Polysarcia, Corpulency. Spec. I. P. Adiposa, (Obesity.) Ge7t. II. Emphyma^ Tumour. Spec. I. E. Sarcoma, (Sarcom.atous tumour.) " 2. " Encystis, (Encysted tumour.) " 3. " Exostosis, (Bony tumour.) Gen. III. Parostia, Mis-ossilication. Spec. I. P. FragiHs, (Fragility of the bones.) " 2. " Flexilis, (FlexiHty of the bones.) Gen. IV. Cyrtosis, Contortion of the bones. Spec. I. C. Rhachia, (Rickets.) ** 2. " Cretinismus, (Cretinism.) i6o good's table of classification. Gen. V. Osthexia^ Osthexy. Spec. I. O. Infarciens, (Parenchymatous os- thexy.) " 2. " Implexa, (Vascular osthexy.) Ord. II. Catotica, Affecting internal surfaces. Gen. I. HydropSy Dropsy. Spec. I. H. Cellularis, (Cellular dropsy.) ** 2. *' Capitis, (Dropsy of the head.) "• 3. "■ Spinae, (Dropsy of the spine.) " 4. " Thoracis, (Dropsy of the chest.) " 5. " Abdominis, (Dropsy of the belly.) '' 6. " Ovarii, (Dropsy of the ovaries.) " 7. " Tubalis, (Dropsy of the Fallopian tubes.) " 8. " Uteri, (Dropsy of the womb.) " 9. " Scroti, (Dropsy of the scrotum.) Gen. II. Emphysema^ Inflation, Wind-dropsy. Spec. I. E. Cellulare, (Cellular inflation.) " 2. " Abdominis, (Tympany.) good's table of classification. i6i Gen. III. Paruriay Mismicturition. Spec. I. P. Inops, (Destitution of urine.) 2. " Retentionis, (Stoppage of urine.) 3. " Stillatitia, (Strangury.) 4. '* Mellita, (Saccharine urine, Diabetes.) 5. " Incontinens, (Incontinence of urine.) 6. " Incocta, (Unassimilated urine.) 7. " Erratica, (Erratic urine.) Gejt. IV. Lithia, Urinary calculus. Spec. I. L. Renalis, (Renal calculus.) " 2. " Vesicalis, (Stone in the bladder.) OrD. III. ACROTICA, Affecting the external surface. Gen. I. EphidrosiSy Morbid sweat E. Profusa, (Profuse sweat.) '* Cruenta, (Bloody sweat.) " Partialis, (Partial sweat.) " Discolor, (Coloured sweat.) '' Olens, (Scented sweat.) " Arenosa^ (Sandy sweat.) Spec. I. 2. 3. 4- 5. 6. i62 good's table of classification. Gen. II. ExanthesiSy Cutaneous blush. Spec. I. E. Roseola, (Rose-rash.) Gen. III. Exorniiay Papulous skin. Spec. I. E. Strophulus, (Gum-rash.) " 2. " Lichen, (Lichenous-rash.) " 3. " Prurigo, (Pruriginous-rash.) " 4. " Milium, (Millet rash.) Gen. IV. Lepidosis, Scale-skin. Spec. I. L. Pityriasis, (Dandriff.) " 2. " Lepriasis, (Leprosy.) *' 3. " Psoriasis, (Dry-scall.) " 4. " Icthyiasis, (Fish-skin.) Gen. V. Ecphlysisy Blains. Spec. I. E. Pompholyx, (Water-blebs.) *' 2. " Herpes, (Tetter.) " 3. ** Rhypia, (Sordid-blain.) " 4. " Eczema, (Heat eruption.) good's table of classification. 163 Gen. VI. Ecpyesis, Humid scall. Spec. I. E. Impetigo, (Running scall.) *' 2. •* Porrigo, (vScabby scall.) " 3. " Ecthyma, (Papulous scall.) " 4. " Scabies, (Itch.) Gen. VII. Malis, Cutaneous vermination. Spec. I. M. Pediculi, (Lousiness.) '' 2. •* Pulicis, (Flea-bites.) " 3. " Acari, (Tick-bite.) ** 4. " Filariae, (Guinea worm.) " 5. " Oestri, (Gad-fly bite.) " 6. " Gordii, (Hair worm.) Gen. VIII Ecphymay Cutaneous excrescence. Spec. I. E. Caruncula, (Caruncle.) " 2. *' Verruca, (Wart.) " 3. " Clavus, (Corn.) " 4. " Callus, (Callus) Gen. IX. Trichosis, Morbid hair. Spec. I. T. Setosa, (Bristly hair.) " 2. " Plica, (Matted hair.) 1 64 good's table of classification. spec. 3. 4. 5- 6. 7. 8. Spec. I 2 3 4 5 6 T. Hirsuties, (Extraneous hair.) " Distrix, (Forky hair.) " Poliosis, (Gray hairs.) " Athrix, (Baldness.) " Area, (Areated hair.) ** Decolor, (Miscolored hair.) Gen. X. EpichrosiSy Macular-skin. E. Leucasmus, (Weal-skin.) '' Spilus, (Mole.) " Lenticula, (Freckles.) *' Ephelis, (Sun-burn.) '* Aurigo, (Orange-skin.) " Poecilia, (Pye-balled-skin.) " Alphosis, (Albino-skin.) Good's classification is exhaustive but his nomenclature very fanciful. The following are among the manv blemishes contained in his sys- tem of classification. Abscess of the breast, bubo, and gum-boil, are placed as species of the same genus ; sty is in the same genus as anthrax ; chilblain with erysipela- tous inflammation ; croup with peritonitis, inflam- mation of the brain, carditis, nephritis, cystitis, etc. ; gout with white swelling ; aphtha with pemphigus and erysipelas ; priapism with wry- ALIBERT. 165 neck and locked-jaw, etc., and yet Good is con- sidered as the greatest of all classifiers. Alibert, in his Nosologie natiirelle ou les maladies du corps humain disiribiiees par fajnilles^ groups diseases, in accordance with the organs affected, into certain classes, families and genera as fol- lows: First class. Trophopathies, or diseases which attack the functions of assimilation. First family. Gastroses, diseases whose princ- ipal seat is in the stomach ; thirteen genera. Second family. Enteroses, enteric diseases ; ten genera. Third family. Choloses, diseases of the biliary- apparatus ; eleven genera. Fourth family. Uroses, diseases of the urinary appai'atus ; twelve genera. Fifth family. Pneumoses, diseases of the respiratory organs ; eight genera. Sixth family. Angioses, diseases of the cir- culatory system ; nineteen genera. Seventh family. Leucoses, diseases of the se- rous and lymphatic system ; twelve genera. Eighth family. x\denoses, diseases of the gland- ular system ; five genera. Ninth family. Ethmoplecoses, diseases of the cellular tissuse ; six genera. 1 66 HOSACK, RAIGE-DELORME. Tenth family. Blennoses, diseases of the mu- cous membranes ; eleven genera. This system of nosography does not appear to have been completed. Doctor Hosack's system consists of eight classes ; twenty-five orders ; and one hundred and ninety-eight genera. The Dictiomiaire de Medecine, second edition Paris 1841, Volume 23rd, p. 240, contains an article with the heading pathologie, by Raige- Delorme, and in this article is included a classi- fication of diseases which is here reproduced as an example of the decline of nosography in the country of its birth. raige-delorme's classification. CLASS I. General diseases whose anatomical conditions are unknow^n. Order i. Pyrexiae. Genus i. Essential pyrexiae. '* 2. Pyrexiae having, besides their febrile phenomena, certain constant an- atomical or physiological charac- ters. *' 3. Exanthematic pyrexiae. *^ 4. Symptomatic pyrexiae. RAIGE-DELORME. 167 Order 2. General cachaectic diseases. (Tuberculosis, melanosis, and the divers degenerations.) CLASS II. Mixed diseases. (General and local.) CLASS III. Local diseases. Order i. Phlegmasiae. Order 2. Haemorrhagiae. Order 3. Diseases which result in degenera- tion of the tissues ; an analogous or a heterologous organic production : tubercle, cancer, melanosis, etc. Order 4. Dropsies. Order 5. Fluxes. Order 6. Pneumatoses. CLASS IV. Neuroses. — Diseases characterised by a trouble in the functions of the nervous system, without appreciable textural lesions. The different genera of neuroses are, Neuroses of the cephalo-rhachidian centres ; l68 COMMENTS ON DELORME'S SYSTEM. Neuroses of the senses ; Neuralgiae ; Neuroses of the respiratory organs ; Neuroses of the heart ; Neuroses of the digestive organs. CLASS V. Virulent diseases. (Syphilis, variola, vaccinia.) CLASS VI. Poisoning. CLASS VIL Asphyxiae. CLASS Vin. Mechanical or Surgical diseases^ This comparatively modern classification and its nomenclature, abound in the greatest inconsis- tencies and inaccuracies, and in the most flagrant violations of the simplest rules of classification and nomenclature, to say nothing of the pathol- ogical inaccuracies and the defective definitions. The name of the first class is objectionable on account of its length and obscurity. The author^ instead of naming the second genus of the first order of this classs, attempts to describe it. In the second order of the first class he mixes tuber- culosis and melanosis with the '' different degen- erations " and repeats them in the third order of COMMENTS ON DELORME'S SYSTEM. 1 69 the third class. The second class is as objection- able as the first class. Among the orders of the third class are jumbled up, phlegmasiae, haemor- rhagiae, dropsies, fiuxes, and pneumatoses. He defines, and inaccurately too, instead of naming, the third order of this third class. Taking into consideration the excellent work, in the direction of arrangement, performed in France for more than a century prior to the ap- pearance of this classification, it is past compre- hension that so inexact and unsatisfactory a classi- fication should have appeared from the pen of a writer in the great medical encyclopedia of a country so renowned for its medical talent. All of the nosographers so far mentioned have enumerated only a very few of the affections of the uro-genital apparatus. A number of other nosographies which have more or less merit are noticed under the head of bibliography. I/O WILLIAMS. As pertinent to the subject, Doctor Williams' tabular arrangement of structural diseases or diseases of nutritition is here reproduced from the American edition of his work published in the year 1853.* Increased. — Hypertrophy- Diminished. — Atrophy Induration Softening Transformation 3 m il\ Contraction Dilatation Obstruction Compression Displacement Rupture, etc. tr. O a, Q Euplastic Cicatrices False membranes f Cirrhosis ^ 1 .• Fibro-cartilajje i CaCOplaStlC^ r.r^v tnh^rrlS o O i Aplastic Non- malignant Malignant I Gray tubercle [ Atheroma, etc. ^ Yellow tubercle I Calareous matter, etc. ( Cysts ^ Tumors ( Hydatids, etc. C Carcinoma < Encephaloma I Melanosis, etc. * Principles of medicine, etc., by Charles J. B. Williams, M. D., F. R. S. etc. American edition by Meredith Clymer, M. D., Philadelphia 1853. The American editor has contrib- uted much to exact nomenclature, particularly in his writings of the last twenty years. AITKEN 171 ON THE PRINCIPLES OF CLASSIFICATION. Sir William Aitken, in his " Science and Practice of Medicine," third edition, published in London in the year 1864, under the head ** Principles of Classification," says : " Many systems of nosology have been adopted from time to time ; and as valuable general prin- ciples have been adduced from some, the grounds on which diseases have been classified may be briefly described under the following nine heads . " I. The nature of the ascertained causes of disease. On this principle two classes of dis- eases are recognised: (i,) Diseases arising from general causes ; (2,) Diseases arising from specific causes. " II. The pathological states and conditions which attend diseases. The principle of this classification consists in determining alterations of the structure or the chemical composition of parts, from which names are given to the dis- ease " III. The properties, powers, or functions of an organ or system of organs being deranged, dictates a classification in which the most prom- inent effects or phenomena of morbid states are considered as the disease *' IV. The diseases comprehended under the 172 AITKEN. two latter principles of classification are some- times inaccurately and loosely brought together under the heads of structural and functional dis- eases. The diseases of function, for instance, be- ing made to embrace the neuroses, haemorrhages, and dropsies; while inflammation, tubercle, can- cer, melanosis, hypertrophy and atrophy are the subordinate classes of the diseases of structure. " V. A basis of classification has been adopted, founded on the pathological nature of the dif- ferent morbid processes, but the arrangement of the orders and subdivisions is determined by the anatomical arrangement of the textures and or- gans of the animal hody, as originally developed by Bichat. " VI. A ground of classification exists, having reference to the general nature and localisation of the morbid states. It comprehends three classes: (i,) Diseases which occupy the whole system at the same time, and in which all the functions are simultaneously deranged. These have been named general diseases, such as fevers ; (2,) Constitutional affections, meaning thereby diseases which display themselves in local lesions in any part but not in all parts at the same time — e.g., rheumatism, gout ; (3,) Local morbid pro- cesses. "VII. Applying the principles of a purely SAVIGNAC, STARK. 1/3 humoral pathology, we have a classification con- sisting of — a. Fevers ; b. Dyscrasiae — e. g., tabes, chlorosis, scorbutus, dropsy, diabetes, pyaemia, tuberculosis, carcinoma ; c. Constitutional dis- eases, induced by, — (i,) specific agents, (2,) veget- able substances. *' Such is Wunderlich's arrangement of dis- eases (1852). " VIII. Mr. de Savignac, Professor of Clinical Medicine at the Naval School of Toulon, has re- cently (1861) propounded a nosological arrange- ment (which he considers a natural one) founded on what he believes to be the ' elements ' of dis- ease. His so called elements seem to be vague general expressions, or names to denote the lead- ing phenomena of diseases or the unknown cause of such phenomena " IX. Doctor Stark, of Edinburgh, has recently (1864) proposed an arrangement embracing six- teen classes: (i,) Fevers; (2,) Diseases of the brain, etc, ; (3,) Diseases of the heart and organs of circulation; (4,) Diseases of the organs of respiration ; (5,) Diseases of the organs of diges- tion ; (6,) Diseases of the urinary organs ; (7,) Diseases of the organs of generation ; (8,) Dis- eases of the organs of locomotion ; (9.) Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue ; (10,) Diseases of uncertain seat ; (11,) Malformation ; (12,) Debility 1/4 STARK, FARR. at birth, and premature birth; (13,) Old age; (14,) Sudden deaths; (15,) Violent or unnatural deaths ; (16,) Causes not specified " Classification conducted on the plan proposed by Doctor Stark is inconsistent with any intelligible principle of arrangement. " None of these nine principles of classification lead to a perfectly philosophical or purely nat- ural classification, because diseases are not yet sufficiently understood to permit us to see clearly their mutual relations ; and the best recommend- ation of any one of them would be a negative one — namely, that of doing the least possible vio- lence to our imperfect knowledge regarding the natural affinities or alliances of diseases, of which we have at present only a sort of instinctive recognition The system adopted by Sir W. Aitken in nearly all the editions of his work is that of Doctor William Farr, and consists of five classes as follows: (i,) Zymotic diseases, four orders; (2,) Constitional diseases, two orders ; (3,) Local diseases, eleven orders ; (4,) Developmental dis- eases, four orders ; (5,) Lesions from violence tending to sudden death, six orders. In all twenty-seven orders. Doctor Farr's system, says Sir W. Aitken, was discussed at several meetings of the statist- ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS. 1 75 ical congress of the European nations, in Paris (1855), ^"d in Vienna (1857), where a nomen- clature similar to the English was adopted, but no definite classification was agreed upon. LABORS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF LONDON. A joint committee, of which Doctor William Farr was a member, appointed by the Royal College of Ph3'sicians of London to draw up a nomenclature of diseases, published its first re- port in the year 1869, after more than ten years of labor. In this report, one thousand one hun- dred and forty-six diseases are enumerated, ex- clusive of human parasites of which fifty-five are counted. The committee very properly offered this nomenclature as only provisional and sug- gested that it be subjected to decennial revisions. The main object of the work, as set forth in the preface, was to lay " the foundation for a nomen- clature of diseases in any language extant on the earth." This nomenclature has been reprinted by order of the chief of the United States Marine Hospital Service, in 1874, and a few years ago a part of the first decennial revision was printed by order of the New York State Board of Health. 1/6 AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. In the year 1869 the American Medical Asso- ciation appointed a committee "to determine what alterations, if any, are necessary, to adapt the Provisional Nomenclature of the Royal Col- lege of Physicians of London to general use in the United States." This Committee reported, in 1870, ** that the English nomenclature was not adapted to this end, and recommended the ap- pointment of a new committee to prepare a nomenclature of their own." The new commit- tee was appointed with Dr. Francis Gurney Smith, as Chairman and, in 1872, presented its report and nomenclature, based upon the English system. A minority report was then submitted to the Association. Both reports were accepted, but only the following resolution, appended to the minority report was adopted. ** Resolved, That the Nomenclature and classi- fication just submitted by the committee be pub- lished in the Transactions ; that one thousand extra copies be printed in pamphlet form and distributed to the profession, and that the ques- tion of the adoption of the proposed Nomencla- ture and classification by this body be postponed till the next annual meeting." The extra copies of the nomenclature v/ere dis- tributed in accordance with the resolution offered by the minority of the committee, and at the ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS. 1 7/ next annual meeting (1873) of the Association a majority report was again presented. But it was urged that the American nomenclature was inferior to the English and after some discussion, the following resolutions were adopted. *' Resolved, That in the opinion of this Asso- ciation, it is inexpedient to adopt the nomencla- ture and classification presented by the majority of the committee on nomenclature at the meeting in Philadelphia." " Resolved, That a committee of three be ap- pointed by the President, whose duty it shall be to communicate the foregoing resolution to the proper committee of the Royal College of Physicians of London, and to negotiate for the representation of the American Medical Associa- tion in the first decennnial revision of their nomenclature." The committee was duly appointed, but has never made any report. In the second edition of the official nomencla- ture of the Royal College of Physicians of Lon- don (1885), it seems as though the committee had failed to take advantage of many of the medical advances of the decade, for, aside from the viola- tions of established principles of nomenclature and classification which it contains, much of the 178 THE DERMATOLOGISTS. old medical terminolog-y is retained, and many symptoms are still classed as diseases. It is needless to indulge in any extended crit- icism of this new nomenclature, since it has al- ready been so fairly and exhaustively reviewed. The reader is therefore referred to the excellent critical analysis of the London nomenclature by Doctor A. Rabagliati, of Bradford, England. This review, which is well worthy of the most careful study, first appeared in the *' Medical Press and Circular," and then in book form.* The dermatologists have contributed largely to systematic arrangement for a century past. Their bibliography begins with the nomenclature of Celsus, of Mercurialis (1572), and of Riolan (1610), from which they trace their systematic ar- rangement of dermatoses down to Auspitz f (1881) and Bronson X (1884 and 1887). Their * Some remarks on the classification and nomenclature of diseases, by A. Rabagliati, M. A., M. D., reprinted from the Medical Press and Circular. — London, Bailliere, Tyndall, and Cox. 1886. t For a very extended dermatographical bibliography, and synopsis of divers systems, see Auspitz' system der Haut- krankheiten, Vienna 1881. I E. B. Bronson. The objects of dermatological classifica- tion, with especial reference to Auspitz' system. Journal of cutaneous and venereal diseases. Vol. II, June 1884. THE DERMATOLOGISTS. 1/9 work however requires a very extensive revision, if not an entire reconstruction. The preceding outline of the history of noso. graphy, and of the synopses of a few of the old systems, is here given with the view of placing the reader in possession of the methods of the nosogfaphers in a compact form, in order that he may see almost at a glance the defects of the early essays and compare them with the modern sys- tems before he contributes his share to the im- provement of this science. A few of the nosographers, to whose labors allusion has been made in the historical outline have worked with great fidelity and earnestness for the improvement of this science, while the great majority have simply copied their prede- cessors and reproduced their most obvious errors without the least attempt at correction. Some of the rules formulated by the early writ- ers are appended to this history. E. B. Bronson. A study of the considerations relating to the classification of skin diseases with an attempt to construct a logical system in accordance with fundamental principles of etiology. Pamphlet, pp. 19. Reprinted from the Journal of cutaneous and genito-urinary diseases. October 1887. i8o RULES FOR THE GUIDANCE OF THE NOSOGRAPHER. The following rules, for the guidance of noso- graphers, laid down by Cullen, Parr, Linnaeus and Young, are given in full because of their general excellence and because they illustrate so well the principles of nomenclature and classi- fication, besides carrying with them the authori- tative weight of these eminent men who labored with so much ardor for the advancement of noso- graphy. Cullen's nosography appeared in the year 1769. He therefore had the benefit of the experience of Sauvages, Linnaeus and Vogel. He endeav- ored to improve upon them, and formulated cer- tain rules for distinguishing genera, species, and varieties. These rules are here reproduced, al- though some of them do not now possess the value which they may have had at the time of their publication.* cullen's rules for distinguishing GENERA, species AND VARIETIES. I. "Those who have turned their attention to this subject hitherto, have not I think proceeded with due consideration. They have gone at once * Edinburgh edition 1800. cullen's rules. i8i to constitute the principal genera of the classes and orders, without sufficiently attending to the species of diseases. Now nature has made noth- ing but species ; the structure of genera is an ef- fort of the human mind, v/hich, till the species are well known and understood, must be falla- cious and uncertain ; and indeed, in constituting genera, unless we have perpetual reference to the species, all our labor will prove futile and vain. 2. " It is certainly a very difficult thing in nosology to say what is a true species, or what is only a variety ; as those marks which serve to distinguish species from varieties in zoology and botany, are not to be found in diseases. I there- fore considered it as safest and even necessary to enumerate many varieties. And as I esteem such a distinction very useful in practice, I have every- where endeavored to make it : not always indeed with equal certainty, but often, at least, with some degree of probability. 3. " When any disease, under Avhich several men labour, exhibits, in each individual, all the symptoms that characterise a certain species, I would not consider that these were different species, because the symptoms prevailed in one patient in a greater or less degree, than in an- i82 cullen's rules. other. And I am of opinion that diseases which differ only in a degree, constitute merely varieties of a certain species. 4. " Accordingly in distinguishing a variety from a species, there is only room for doubt when, in the diseases of different persons, any symptoms are wanting which generally accom- pany a species, or when others are present. 5. " When any of the usual symptoms are wanting ; and we can distinguish between those that are more and those that are less essential, 1 consider the absence of such symptoms as indica- tive of a variety only. 6. '* When to the characteristic symptoms, others are added, which can be reckoned the symptoms of symptoms, rather than the symp- toms of the cause, they constitute only a variety. 7. ** Again, when these additional symptoms are quite unusual, while, at the same time, the principal circumstances of the disease are little or not at all changed ; these too afford only a variety. 8. " When any genus of disease may arise from different causes, the diversity of the cause may occasion likewise diversity in the species, though not always ; for when the difference is small, and the symptoms at the same time are little affected cullen's rules. 185 by it, that difference will constitute only a variety. 9. "A genus of disease may, in the same man-^ ncr, produce different species, according to the diversity of its seat; but as often as the seat is different, while there is no difference either with respect to the structure of the part or Jts func- tions, this diversity of seat can only indicate a variety." In the edition of 1827, Cullen remarks, that in nosology, by beginning with the characters of the class, and from thence descending to orders and genera, the term genus has been very universally applied to species, and that, by imitation, he had . been led to do the same thing, for, of the one hun- dred and thirty three genera which he had estab- lished in his first edition, a hundred are properly species, and admit of no farther division except into varieties. He further said, "the characters of diseases are formed by a concourse of various symptoms, every particular of which, in the language of methodical writers, is a nota or mark : now, in forming the character, the first, and the most important rule is, that these marks should be neither more nor fewer than are ab- solutely necessary. If we have more, we pass from characters or definitions to descriptions ; i84 cullen's rules. Ave leave persons in doubt when they find a dis- ease with the strictly essential character, by add- ing other circumstances which they may suppose to be equall}^ necessary. The nosologists have been faulty in giving both superfluous and de- ficient characters. " A second rule is, that the marks which we employ should be sufficiently evident, and if pos- sible, constantly present at every period of the disease, these at least (that) are the most charac- teristic. Nosologists transgress against this rule when the marks are taken from the duration, and much more from the event of the disease. To affirm that a disease is a fatal one, is indeed a part of its history, but cannot serve as a charac- ter when we first view the disease. " The third rule is, that the notae chosen should be expressed in clear and very intelligible terms, and, if possible, in terms the meaning of which is already fixed in science The want of due precision of language affects many parts of all our systems. It is well known, that the want of precision in the use of terms for a long time retarded the perfection of botany ; and it has been the greatest merit of Linnaeus, that he gave much more precision, and a determined meaning to almost every word employed in that parr's rules. 185 science, which he did by forming a delineato J)lantae, by fixing a term for every part of a plant, and for all the circumstances in which these parts can vary. But we will not bring nosology to a good condition till something of the same kind, a delineatio morbi, be attempted, which ought to consider all the symptoms that -enter into a specific character in another view than that taken by the pathologists, who only trace them to their causes. Here we ought to •examine the symptoms more minutely with re- spect to the variety of their appearance, and affix terms to them accordingly. " The fourth rule, is that the characters should be absolutely free and independent from all theory and hypothesis Every species ought to have the character of its genus ; and in naming or distinguishing species, it is sup- posed sufficient merely to name the genus, and to add such marks as distinguish the species." parr's rules. Under the head of classification Dr. Parr says : I. "It is said that nature has created only species : it is not true ; for she has created only individuals. The similarity of these has occa- sioned the establishment of species. Individuals, i86 parr's rules. differing in circumstances arising from accident ; in plants and animals, from soil and climate ; in diseases, from constitution ; in minerals, from lo- cality, are styled varieties ; and these, when cir- cumstances are changed, return to the species from which they started. These distinctions,, though apparently simple and obvious, are how- ever, necessary ; for naturalists have usually be- gun at the other extremity, and formed ' meth- ods,' classes, and orders before they have estab- lished species and, at this moment, in nosology and mineralogy, the greatest impediments to im- provement arise from the uncertainty of what are species. Even in botany this difficulty was once so great, that more than half of Tourne- fort's supposed species have been found to be varieties only. Three-fourths of Sauvages' species of diseases are varieties or symptoms.* 2. " This is the first step in arrangement ; for the establishment of species consists in ascertain- ing identity ; of genera similarity. A striking discriminating mark, in many species, sometimes * The criticism made, by Dr. Parr of Sauvages' species of diseases, three quarters of a century ago, will apply, to a very great extent, to the two editions of the modern English nomenclature, for they both include many symptoms classed as diseases. parr's rules. 187 establishes a genus ; at others, a general similar- ity. The conduct of botanists, however, has dif- fered in this part of their labor, from the differ- ence of their dispositions. Some naturalists^ catching hastily at analogies, have included nu- merous species under a genus : others more wary and exact, have retrenched them too rigorously. The latest botanists have rendered the genera more, sometimes too, numerous ; but this of the two is the more venial error, since new dis- coveries continually enlarge them. 3. " An order is an association of genera ; but orders are usually too comprehensive, including^ too great a number of genera ; and to facilitate investigation, these are often divided into sepa- rate groups, as in mineralogy the species are sometimes divided into sub-species. Each is a proof of imperfection in arrangement. 4. "A class contains the different orders; and though in reality, it should be the last, or nearly the last, labourer, it has usually been the first ; and to make the system elegant in appearance^ the classes have been few and comprehensive." -1 88 APHORISMS RELATING TO CLASSIFICATION, TAKEN CHIEFLY FROM THE PHILOSOPHIA BOTANICA OF LINNAEUS, BY DOCTOR THOMAS YOUNG. Of generic characters. 1. *' The foundation of methodical science con- sists of two parts, arrangement and nomenclature. 2. ''Arrangement is either theoretical, relating to classes, orders, and genera, or practical, relat- ing to species and varieties. 3. " Arrangement or method is either synop- tical or systematic. 4. *' A synopsis depends on arbitrary divisions proceeding in pairs at each step, and is not ad- missible in botany, except as a key or index. 5. '* A system proceeds in its arrangement by five steps ; classes, orders, genera, species, and varieties. 6. "System is the Ariadnean thread, without which all is confusion. 7. '' Species m natural history are supposed to have been originally created distinct. 8. '"■ Varieties may be as numerous as the in- dividuals which have been produced. 9. " Genera are determined in botany from the agreement of the parts of fructification. LINNAEUS AND YOUNG. 1 89 10. '* Classes are deduced from the regular agreement of many genera, in the parts which characterise them. 11. "An order is a subdivision of a class, in-^ tended for convenience. 12. ** Species and genera depend on nature ; varieties often on cultivation ; classes and orders on a combination of nature and art. 13. '* Habit is a general agreement in growth and appearance. 14. " Habit is to be silently consulted in form- ing genera, but must not and cannot be de- scribed. 15. "No positive rules can be laid down re^ specting identity of genus. 16. " Few genera are without some cases of accidental deviation. 17. " Each genus is commonly characterised by^ some decided singularity of form. 18. "Genera thus marked must be kept dis-^ tinct or united accordingly. 19. " The more constant the mark in different species, the better distinction it affords. 20. " Different parts are the most constant in different genera ; but scarcely any part is ever wholly invariable. 190 APHORISMS OF LINNAEUS 21. ** A generic character is the definition of a genus, and may be of three kinds, factitious, es- sential, or natural. 22. " An essential character affords a singular and appropriate criterion of the genus. Its ex- cellence depends on its brevity. 23. *' A factitious character distinguishes the genus only from others of the same artificial order. 24. " A natural character contains everything remarkable that is found in all the species of the genus. It may often require alteration when new species are discovered. 25. ''A factitious character is a substitute for an essential one, which is always the best when it can be obtained. A natural character is a work of great labor, but, when completed, it is the basis of all systems, the guardian of genera, and is applicable to every correct and practicable mode of arrangement. 26. "No character can be infallible unless it has been compared with all the species of the genus. 27. " A generic character must not contain comparisons, except with things perfectly well known. 28. " The character must be expressed in se- AND YOUNG. I9I lect, accurate, distinct, and compendious terms, sufficient in number, but not superfluous. 29. "The character must remain invariable in every possible system that can be adopted. With this precaution, the introduction of a new system is no misfortune. 30. " A genus may consist of a single species, although it more usually contains several species. 31. " What is established respecting the charac- ters of genera must be understood, with some latitude, of those of classes. 32. " Classes are more arbitrary than genera, orders than either. 33. " The more naturally classes are established the better. 34. '* Great difficulty arises from the excessive length or number of classes and orders. 35. ''Genera which are allied to each other ought to stand together. Of names. 36. " He who establishes a new genus is bound also to give it a name. 37. " A generic name must be decided on be- fore a specific one is formed. 192 APHORISMS OF LINNEAUS 38. " No man in his senses would employ a generic name destitute of etymological meaning. 39. " Generic names consisting of two entire and separate words are prohibited. 40. " Generic names consisting of two Latin words united together are scarcely to be tol- erated. Such compounds of Greek origin, on the contrary, are elegant. 41. " Generic names of hybrid origin, for in- stance partly Greek and partly Latin, are to be rejected. 42. " Generic names including other generic names are unworthy of a scientific nomenclature. 43. " Generic names ending in oides are pro- hibited. 44. '* Generic names derived from others by the addition of a sjdlable are disapproved. 45. *' Generic names very nearly resembling each other are likely to cause confusion. 46. '' Generic names not derived from Greek or Latin are forbidden. 47. '' Generic names common to natural history and anatomy, pathology, therapeutics, or the arts, are to be avoided. (Thus lichen must not be a genus of diseases : and I have been obliged to change the name spiloma into spilosis, having AND YOUNG. I93 found that the botanists had taken possession of this too.) 48. '* Generic names contradicting the proper- ties of some of the species are bad. 49. " Generic names must not be identified with those of natural classes or orders. 50. " Diminutives and derivatives of a similar nature are allowable as generic names. (The diminutives of other generic names are however scarcely admissible.) 51. " Adjectives are inferior to substantives as generic names. 52. " Generic names which have already been employed are to be preferred where it can be done without inconvenience. (Sometimes how- ever it is better to employ a new term than to alter materially the application of an old one.) 53. " Such generic names as express an essen- tial character or habit are the best. 54. "An ancient name should be employed for a genus long established. 55. "A good name once established ought not to be changed, even for a better or more ancient one. 56. " If a genus is to be divided, the old name 194 APHORISMS OF LINNAEUS must remain attached to the most common species. 57. " Generic names are to be written in Latin letters, the Greek letters being expressed accord- ing to the established custom. 58. ''The sounds of generic names are to be softened as much as possible. 59. *' Long and harsh names are to be avoided. Names should scarcely exceed twelve letters. 60. " Terms of art ought not to be employed for generic names. 61. " Names of classes and orders are to be governed by the same rules as those of genera. The name is to be single ; not unmeaning, hybrid, barbarous, equivocal, inapposite, personal, too long, nor harsh. 62. '• Names of classes and orders should in- clude their characteristic marks. Of specific differences. > 63. " A perfect name includes a generic and a specific name. All solid learning in natural his- tory, agriculture, and medicine, depends on the knowledge of species. 64. "A legitimate specific name or character distinguishes the species from all others of the AND YOUNG. I95 same genus. Trivial names, often called specific names, are subjected to no very accurate rules. 65. " All specific characters which distinguish the species from others, not of the same genus, arc superfluous and bad. 66. ** Trivial names are only limited to a single word. (Substantives have an advantage over ad. jectives, as being more convenient when brevity is required ) 6y. " Specific characters must be taken from circumstances not subject to vary. 68. " Magnitude affords no specific distinction. (Thus the degree of putrescency scarcely affords a sufficient distinction between nervous and pu- trid fever.) 69. " Comparisons with other genera are to be excluded from specific characters. 70. " Comparisons with other species of the same genus are bad. 71. *' Care must be taken to exclude varieties from the rank of species. 72. *' Each species must bear the name of the genus. 73. " The specific name must always follow the generic. The idea of the genus must occur first to the mind. 196 APHORISMS OF LINNAEUS 74. " A specific name without the generic is like a bell without a clapper. 75. " The specific name must not be united to the generic as a termination. "jd. "A genuine specific character is either synoptic or essential. jj. " A synoptic specific character distinguishes the species of the genus by successive subdivi- sions into two portions. In large genera such subdivisions are often indispensable. 78. " An essential specific character exhibits a single distinction, appropriate to one species only. 79. '' The shorter a specific character can be made, the better, provided that it be sufficient. 80. *' Specific characters must contain only such words as are necessary for distinguishing the species from others of the same genus. 81. '' When a genus contains only one species, a specific character is superfluous. (There may however be cases in which a character, pointed out as likely to be essential, by a person well acquainted with the species, may be useful in dis- tinguishing it from others subsequently dis- covered.) 82. *' When a new species of a genus is dis- AND YOUNG. IQ/ covered, the characters of all the other species must be accommodated to it, if they become in- adequate. 83. " The words forming- a specific character are not to be compounds resembling generic names, nor purely Greek, but Latin ; and the more simple they are, the better. 84. ** The specific character ought not to be embellished by the flowers of rhetoric, but natu- ral and faithful. 85. *' The specific character admits neither comparatives nor superlatives. 86. " The specific character must be expressed in positive terms, not negative. (Privatives are often unavoidable, although in some measure objectionable ) 87. '* Resemblances, if ever employed for spe- cific characters, must be striking and well known. 88. '* Adjectives mrast immediately follow their substantives. 89. *' Conjunctive particles are to be excluded from specific characters, except v/here they are necessary to the sense. 90. " Successive adjectives are not to be sep- arated by commas. 91. " A specific character must never contain 198 APHORISMS OF LINNAEUS a parenthesis, whether distinguished or not by the appropriate mark. A parenthesis is bad, as implying a defect of order. Of varieties. 92. ** To the generic name and specific charac- ter the distinction of a variety may be added, where it exists. 93. *' The generic names, the specific character, and the marks of varieties, are to be printed in different types. 94. '' Very slight varieties are to be disre- garded. 95. ''The specific character must agree with all the varieties, as far as is practicable. 96. " It is often as difficult and as important to reduce varieties to their proper species, as species to their proper genus. Of Synonyms, 97. " Among the synonyms enumerated, the most approved name is to be set down first. 98. "Authors who have employed the same synonyms are to be quoted together. 99. " Each synonym is to begin a new line. AND YOUNG. I99 100 ** Synonyms must be accompanied by the names of the authors, and the pages of the works in which they are to be found." The student of nosography may, with profit, consult the modern system of " Laws of Botanical Nomenclature'' which was adopted by the Inter- national Botanical Congress held at Paris in August, 1867, and which was published together with a historical introduction and a commentary by Alphonse De Candolle. 200 BIBLIOGRAPHY. SECTION III. NOSOGRAPHICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY. A chronological list of the works on nosography that have appeared from the time of Felix Platerus to the present. Platerus, (Felix) — Praxeos Medicae, etc. Bas- iliae, 1602. Warenius, (Henricus) — Nosologia. Leipsiae, 1605. Petraeus, (Henricus) — Nosologia Harmonica, Dogmatica, et Hermetica. Mar- burgi, 1614. Junius, (Adrianus) — Nomenclator. Francofurti, 1620. JOHNSTONUS, (J.) — Idea Universalis Medicinae. Amsteldami, 1644. SCHOENFELD, (Phillipus Jacobus) — Nosologia. Ingolstadii, 1675. Sauvages, (Frangois Boissier de) — Nouvelles classes des Maladies Dispos^es dans un Ordre Semblable a celui des Botanistes, Comprenant les Genres et les especes. Montpellier, 1732. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 201 Sauvages, (F. B. de)— Nosologia Methodica. Lugduni, 1760, Geneva, 1763. Hebenstreit, (Johannes Ernestus) — Program- mata, Ordo Morborum Causalis. Leipsiae, 1754— 1757. Hebenstreit, (J. E.) — Exegesis nominum grae- corum, quae morbos definiunt. Lip- siae, 175 1 — 1761. Linnaeus, (Carolus) — Genera morborum. Up- salae, 1759 — 1763. VoGEL, (Rudolphus Augustus) — Dissertatio, Def- initiones Generum Morborum. Goet- ingae, 1764. Plenk, (J. J.) — Novum Systema Tumorum qui hi morbi in sua genera et species rediguntur. Vienna, 1767. Cullenus, (Guiliemus) — Synopsis Nosologiae Methodicae in Usum Studiosorum. Edin., 1769, — 1772, — 1780. Cullen, (William) — A synopsis of Methodical Nosology, etc., translated, from the fourth edition, by Henry Wilkins, M. D. Philadelphia, 1793. Cullen, (W.) — Nosology, etc., translated from the Latin. Edin., 1800. 202 BIBLIOGRAPHY. CuLLENUS, (G.) — Synopsis nosologiae melh- odicae, etc., editio sexta, 1803. CULLEN, (W.) — The works of, edited by John Thomson, M. D., etc. Edin., 1827. Sagar, (J. B. M.) — Systema morborum symp- tomaticorum secundum classes, or- dines, et genera, cum characteribus. Vienna, 1771. Editio tertia, 1783. Macbride, (David) — A Methodical Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Physic. London, 1772. Selle, (Christ. T.) — Rudimenta Pyretologiae Methodicae. Berlin, 1773. Ackermann, (J. F.) — Programma sistens nosolo- giam Holsaticam. Kiloniae, 1773. Hartung, ( ) — Diss, de generali mor- borum divisione. Aug. Trev., 1777. Hennemann, (Guil. Josephus) — Primae lineae nosologiae animalium. Goettingae, 1778, VlTET, (Louis) — Medecine expectante. Lyons, 1778. (Containing a nosological method.) Haartmann, (J. J.) — Diss. Sciagraphiae mor- borum. Aboae,^i779. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 203 CiRlLLio, (D.) — Nosologiae Methodicae Rudi- menta. Napoles, 1780. TODE, (J. C.) Copenhagen, 1781. Daniel, (Chris. Fredericus) — Sjstema aegritu- dinum. Leipsiae, 1781. GlESEKE, ( ) — Animadversiones in systema nosologicum. Goettingae, 1781. Vachier, ( ) — ** Methode nosologique.** Paris, 1785. Wallis, (George) — Nosologia methodica ocu- lorum ; or a treatise on diseases of the eyes ; selected and translated from the Latin of Francis Boissier de Sauvages, with annotations. London, 1785. Van Heuvell, ( ) — Tentamen nosolog- icum, sistens morborum a vitio vis vitalis divisionem et dispositionem practicam. Lugduni Batav., 1787. Sprengel, (Curtius) — Rudimentorum nosologiae dynamicorum prolegomena. Hallae, 1787. Baldinger, (E.g.) — Opuscula Medica, containing among other dissertations, animad- versionum in systema nosologiae, specimina 1 et IL Goettingae, 1787-8. 204 BIBLIOGRAPHY. LaUTH, (Thomas) — Nosologia chirurgica. Ar- gentorati, 1788. Ploucquet, (Guil. Godofredus) — Delineatio sys- tematis nosologici naturae accomo- dati. Tiibingae, 1791. Ploucquet, (G. G.) — Onomatopoeae nosologiae fundamenta. Tubingae, 1793. Dyrsen, ( ) — Diss, primae lineae systematis morborum aetiologici. Goettingae, 1792. Arnemann, (Justus) — Synopsis Nosologiae. Goettingae, 1793. ASSUR, ( ) — Diss. Animadversiones ad sys- tema nosologica usitatiora. Regio- montis, 1794. Darwin, (Erasmus) — Zoonomia. London, 1794 — 1795. Grunner, (Chris. Gottfr.) — Nosologia Historica. lenae, 1795. MUNCK, ( ) — Diss, sistens nonnulas circa nosologiam methodicam observa- tiones. Lundini, 1796. Caillau, (Jean Marie) — Premieres lignes de nosologic enfantine. Bordeaux, 1797. PiNEL, (Philip) — Nosoi^raphie philosophique. Paris, 1798 — 1818. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 20$ Castel, (Louis) — Analyse critique et impartiale de la nosographie philosophique de Pinel. Paris, An VII. Hoffmann, (Philip) — Grundriss eines systems der Nosologie und Therapie. Elber- feld, 1798. Callisen, (H.) — Systema Chirurgiae Hodiernae. Containing a classification of sur- gical diseases. Copenhagen, 1798. Nebel, (E. L. W.) — Specimen nosologiae bru- torum cum hominum morbis com- paratae. Giessae, 1798. Villars, (de Grenoble) — Tableau nosographique servant d'introduction a la con- naissance des maladies internes et externes, 1798. WiLLAN, (Robert) — Description and Treatment of cutaneous diseases. London, 1798 — 1807. Brera, (Valeriano Luigi) — Classificazione delle malatie secondo i principi di Brown, si premette una definizione dei vo- caboli propri del sistema Brovvniano. Venet., 1799. Horn, (Ernst) — Versuch einer praktischen noso- logie der fieber. Brunsvic, 1800. 206 BIBLIOGRAPHY. Baumes, (J. B. Th.) — Fondemens de la science methodique des maladies. Mont- pellier, 1801. Baumes, (J. B. Th.) — Essai d'un syst^me chimique de la science de Thomme. Nismes. an VI. Meyer, ( ) — Diss, integram et systematicam morborum divisionem dari non posse una cum nonnullis observa- tionibus de principio nosologiae Reschlaubianae subjecto. Franco- furti ad Viadrum, 1801. Tourdes, (J.) — Esquisse d'un syst^me de noso- logic, fonde sur la physiologic et la therapeutique. Strasbourg, 1802. Bayle, (G. L.) — Considerations sur la nosologic, la medecine d'observation, et la medecine pratique, suivies d'observa- tions pour servir a I'histoire des pustules gangreneuses. Paris, 1802. Abernethy, (John) — Sui'gical observations, con- taining a classification of tumors, etc. London, 1804. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 20/ Abernethy, (J.) — " An attempt to form a classi- fication of tumors according to their anatomical structure." In the Sur- gical works of John Abernethy, F. R. S. From the sixth London edi- tion. Hartford, Connecticut, 1825. Crichton, (Alex.) — A synoptical table of dis- eases, exhibiting their arrangement in classes, orders, genera, and spe- cies. London, 1804. ToURTELLE, (E.) — Elemens de medecine theorique et pratique. 1805. Salva, (D. F.) — Discorso sobre la necesidad de reformar los nombres de los morbos, y plan para hacerlo. Barcelona, 1807. Parr, (Bartholomew) — The London Medical Dictionary. 1809. Article nosology. SWEDIAUR, F. (18 1 2.) — In Hosack's system of Nosology. Young, (Thom^as) — An introduction to medical literature, including a system of practical nosology. London, 18 13. Davidge, (J. B.) — Nosologia methodica: classium et generum, et specierum, et varieta- tum series morborum exhibens. Edit. 2d. Baltimore, 181 3. 208 BIBLIOGRAPHY. RiCHERAND, (Anthelme)— Nosographie chirur- gicale 4ieme edition, 1815. 5ieme eHition, 1821. Herritz, (Aloysius Benedictus) — Diss, sistens notiones quasdam de summis mor- borum generibus. Viennae, 181 5. DURET, (J. J.)— Tableau d'une classification generale des maladies. Paris, 181 5. Good, (John Mason) — A physiological system of nosology, with a corrected and sim- plified nomenclature. London, 1817. Good, (J. M.) — The study of medicine. London, 1822. Bateman, (Thomas) — Delineations of cutaneous diseases, etc. London, 1817. Seigneur-Gens. — Nosographie Generale. 18 18. Alibert, (Le Baron J. L.) — Nosologic naturelle, ou les maladies du corps humain dis- tribuees par families. Paris, 1818 — 1838. Hosack, (David) — A system of practical nosol- ogy, etc. New York, 18 18 — 1821. PiNEL ET Bricheteau. Article nosographie dans le Dictionaire des Sciences Medicales. Tome 36. Paris, 18 19. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 209 Barbier, (J. B. Q.) — Precis de nosologic et de therapeutique (unfinished). Paris, 1827. BoiSSEAU, (F. G.) — Nosologic organique, ou traite complct de medecinc pratique. 4 vol. 8 vo. Paris, 1828. Struve, (L. a.) — Synopsis morborum cuta- neorum secundum classes, genera, species et varietates. Berlin, 1829. PlORRY, (P. A.) — Traite de Medecinc Pratique et de Pathologic iatrique on medi- cale : Polygraphies ou generalites. Vol. I, 1841. Delorme, (Raige) — Article pathologic in the Dictionnaire de Medecine, second edition, vol 23. Paris, 1841. BOUILLAUD, (J. B.) — Traite de Nosographie med- icalc. Paris, 1846. AlTKEN, (William) — Science and practice of medicine. Article nosology — con- taining Doctor William Farr's classi- fication. The nomenclature of diseases drawn up by a joint committee of the Royal College of Physi- cians of London. London, 1 869. A nomenclature of diseases with the reports of 2IO BIBLIOGRAPHY. the majority and of the minority of the commit- tee thereon. Presented to the American Medical Association at the meeting held in Philadelphia^ May, 1872. Philadelphia, 1872. Nomenclature of diseases prepared for the use of the medical officers of the United States Marine Hospital Service, by the Supervising- Surgeon, John M. Woodworth, M. D., being the classification and English-Latin terminology of the provisional nomenclature of the Royal Col- lege of Physicians, London. Washington, 1874. Nomenclature of diseases. State Board of Health of New York (No. 65). New York, 1883. Paul, (F. T.) — A classification of the new. growths of the urinary system (Blad- der, Prostate, and Kidney). British Medical Journal, January 12th, 1884^ Bronson, (E. B.) — The objects of dermatological classification, with especial reference to Auspitz' system. Pamphlet, pp. Reprinted from the Journal of Cu- taneous and Venereal Diseases. VoL II, June, 1884. The nomenclature of diseases drawn up by a joint committee appointed by the Royal College of Physicians of London. Second edition, being the first revision. London, 1885. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 211 Rabagliati, (A.) — Some remarks on the classifi- cation and nomenclature of diseases. (Reprinted from the Medical Press and Circular). London, 1886. Smith, (Joseph R., U. S. Army)— On the best form of report of the sick and wounded of Armies. A paper read before the Section on Military and Naval Surgery and Medicine of the Ninth International Medical Con- gress. September, 1887. BroNSON, (E. B.) — A study of the considerations relating to the classification of skin diseases with an attempt to con- struct a logical system in accordance with fundamental principles of etiol- ogy. Pamphlet, pp. 19. Reprinted from the Journal of Cutaneous and Genito-urinar}^ diseases. October, 1887. 212 SECTION IV. BASIS AND METHOD OF THE CLASSIFICATION AND CHARACTER OF THE NOMENCLATURE OF THE DISEASES OF MAN. Many high authorites opposed to classification. To think is to classify. Characteristics of good classifiers. Modern classifiers use terms of classification arbitrarily without taking the pains to define these terms. Nosography on the basis of symptoms misleading and retrogressive. Anatomy the only stable basis for nosography. Description and definition of dis- eases. Methods of the nosographer. The use of the dead languages in nomenclature. The names of men should not be applied to diseases. Suggestions for an improved classifica- tion of diseases. A consense of views necessary in the use of terms of classification. Questions suggested for discussion at the Tenth International Medical Congress. Definitions of the terms of classification. As preliminary to the further consideration of human nosography, the following questions may with propriety be propounded : 1. Is there need of classification of any kind ? 2. If so, what should be the basis of the classi- fication of diseases ? 3. What should be the character of the nomen- clature of diseases ? 4. What should be the method of the classifica- tion of diseases ? NEED OF CLASSIFICATION. 21 3 An answer to each of these questions will now be submitted to the decision of the medical pro- fession, for no official nosography should be established except with the concurrence of the medical profession. I. IS THERE NEED OF CLASSIFICATION OF ANY KIND? Despite the well known aphorism, " system is the Ariadnean thread without which all is confu- sion," some of the highest authorities in science have been opposed to methodical arrangement. Among them may be cited the celebrated Buffon. Many of the physicians of the present time do not approve of classification notwithstanding the fact that medicine is a science only by reason of the methodical arrangement of diseases, and that these physicians themselves are constantly classi- fying, for they think and therefore classify, and it is a fact that to think is to classify, therefore in thinking they classify nolens volensj^ To think of * " Looking to the experience of the past, it cannot, with any reason, be urged that systematic arrangements, if consistent with existing knowledge ever cramp or hamper a man in carrying out scientific investigations ; on the contrary, they enable him to sec more clearly in what direction his la- bor must be advanced, and demonstrate more forcibly than otherwise the deficiencies of his knov/lege." (Aitken.) 214 BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. an object is to recognise the properties which dif- ferentiate it from other objects and consequently place it in its proper class. — Particular illustra- tions need not be given. — But to make a general classification accurate and useful requires pro- found thinking, a good understanding, sound judgment, persevering study, careful observa- tion, persistent labor, untiring industry, and the co-operation of many men possessing these quali- ties. Nosotaxy however to be of practical utility to the medical profession, and of much benefit to mankind, requires more than the co-operation of many men. It exacts the prompt and substantial aid of the very great majority of all true physi- cians in the world. The answer to the first question is that there is great need of a classification of the diseases of man, established upon a proper basis, which shall constitute an epitome of the science of medicine. 2. WHAT SHOULD BE THE BASIS OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES? During this century nosography has not ad- vanced so rapidly as might have been reasonably expected. Among the chief reasons of this hin- derance are ; (i,) that the establishment of a proper basis for its development has never been BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. 21$ agreed upon by the medical profession, and (2,) that no particular system of classification has been officially adopted by the profession. Individuals and certain nations having- each some special sys- tem of classification and nomenclature of diseases, with no apparent aim toward uniformity. In sundry nosographical arrangements the words groups, sections, classes, orders, families, tribes, genera, and species, are so loosely and carelessly employed that it is difficult to understand the meaning which these terms are intended to con- vey, used, as they often are, in violation of estab- lished principles of classification, for many classi- fiers employ them arbitrarily and do not take the pains to give their own definitions of these arbi- trary terms. The starting point in nearly all the systems of nosography is the symptom. This has led astray many nosographers who, mistaking symptoms for diseases, placed these symptoms in the category of diseases, notwithstanding the existing excellent rules for the guidance of the student of noso- graphy. The system of Cullen having been judged the best was, for many years, in general use, and yet it was full of the most glaring errors, some of which he acknowledged in after years. Many of Parr's suggestions were excellent, but his system was as ill founded as those of his pre- 2l6 BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. decessors. Pinel's " nosographie philosophique ^ which superseded the nosology of Cullen in France, has long- been obsolete. It failed, even after a very considerable number of revisions, probably because it was established upon the same faulty basis as that of former systems. The nosographical contributions of Recamier, of Richerand and of others had no better success. More than forty years ago Doctor Williams classified and tabulated certain diseases upon a physio-pathological basis, but there halted. It seems clear that the great defect of all these systems is the lack of a stable basis upon which to erect the structure of nosography. This defect was long ago realised but not remedied, and nosography had already shown signs of decay when it was almost entirely reconstructed by Doctor William Farr and by the Royal College of Pysicians of London. But even the modern English system is full of inconsistencies although it is declared to be founded upon anatomy. It is noteworthy that nearly all the early gen- eral nosographers were at either extreme of adopting very few or very many classes, and that they failed to agree as to what should constitute classes, orders, genera, species, or symptoms, for these are scattered throughout what at first sight seem to be the most methodical arrangements. BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. 21/ Thus phlegmasiae are placed among classes by Sauvages, Linnaeus, and Sagar, and among or- ders by Cullen, Vogel, Macbride, and Good. These, and many other blemishes already pointed out, occur from the time of Sauvages to that of Hosack, and are owing partly to the fact that too little attention has been bestowed upon species notw^ithstanding the caution of Cullen who, how- ever, fell into the error he so much wished to avoid, and partly to the state of knowledge of physiology and morbid anatomy at that epoch. Although Doctor Good based his nosology upon physiology, he reaffirmed many of the errors of the older authors. This want of agreement, and the absence of a substantial foundation and of associated harmoni- ous labor, have given rise to the greatest confu- sion in the use of terms and in arrangement. This confusion and the tendency of each noso- grapher to reproduce the inaccuracies of his pre- decessors, have greatly impeded the progress of nosography and have led to much unfavorable criticism and to the frequently asked question, *' of what use is nosography '* ? — This question is now often sneeringly asked by those who fail to appreciate the fact that, without the existing sys- tematic arrangement of diseases, they could not have learned, and could not intelligently and sue- 2l8 BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. cessfully practise, medicine. — In the beginning of this century nosography was not regarded with much favor by many learned physicians both in England and on the continent of Europe, and the mass of the profession spoke of it contemptu- ously. Doctor Parr, in commenting thereon says : '' nosology is seldom mentioned but to be ridiculed and despised." * Under the same head, Parr says : *' Systems are the work of our own minds ; for nature advances by almost imperceptible shades ; and where we cannot point out the termination of one family, and the commencement of another, it is only confessing that the intermediate link is unknown : thus when our knowledge advances the advantages of our system lessen, for our lim- its are lost " If a foundation could be obtained, it was ap- parently by considering the disorder as connected with an internal change, which would then afford what might be styled an object, whose properties we might examine. . " The great advantage of nosology is distinc- tion, discrimination, etc We still want a delineatio morbiiu imitation of tht, delineatio plantae in Linnaeus." * The London Medical Dictionary. London, 1809. BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. 219 How can proper distinction, discrimination, and a delineatio morbi be made unless nosography have a stable foundation such, for instance, as can be built from anatomy ? As early as the year 1801 Bayle was of opinion that nosography should be founded upon anatomy, but the idea was never fully carried out, although Alibert named his families of diseases in accordance with the organs affected, although Richerand and others made similar attempts, and although the modern English system is avowedly founded upon anatomy."^ It was an error of much consequence on the part of the nosographers to make symptoms the foundation of the science instead of using them as one of the means by which to discover individ- ual diseases. An anatomical foundation would in no way have lessened the importance of symp. tomatology and of semeiology, for, however sub- stantial might have been the foundation of noso- graphy, its superstructure could never have been built without proper methods of detecting and of expressing the characteristics of diseases. It is * The latest work of Sauvages (published a year after his death) contained a symptomatica!, an etiological, and an anatomical arrangement, but the etiological and anatomical were held in entire subordination to the symptomatical ar- rangement. 220 BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. chiefly by the aid of symptoms and signs that in- dividual affections are recognised and species established, and it is from species that the super- structure rises. While due consideration should be given to symptoms, it would, in the present state of science, seem unwise to attempt to make a delineatio morbi solely upon the basis of symp- toms, for, without placing under contribution aetiology and pathoanatomy, it would not be possible to fix a term for every circumstance in which the morbid conditions might vary. For example, in the case of a deformity, the descrip- tion of its external charaters would be insufficient and its definition inexact if the cause and pathic properties were not set forth. This cause may be an injury, or a previous disease, or the de- formity may be congenital. Again, an echmatic affection may be owing to a congenital anomaly, to a previous disease, or to an injury. A tumor may consist of fat, or of muscular or fibrous tis- sue, of cartilage, or of bone, or of cellular ele- ments which are rapidly proliferated to be soon destroyed. In such cases, symptoms would in- dicate simply the existence of a tumor of a cer- tain size and shape and its immediate effects, but not its anatomical properties. To make the de- scription of an abnormal condition of the human BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. 221 body accurate and its definition exact, all the cir- cumstances connected with it should be closely scrutinised and analyzed, whether they be ex- ternal manifestations, or physical signs brought to light by the aid of certain tests systematically applied, as for instance, in the case of the sense of hearing in auscultation, of touch in palpation, or of other methods of physical exploration. At the same time the greatest importance should be attached to the causes and to the pathic proper- ties of these conditions as revealed by the mod- ern appliances for determining the anatomical and other characters of diseases, such as chemical tests, the electrical apparatus, the microscope, the polariscope, and other instruments of pre- cision. Cullen speaks of the difficulty he experienced in determining what is really a true species and what is onh' a variety, and finds it necessary to enumerate many varieties. Tliis difficulty doubt- lessly arose from his adopting a system based upon symptoms rather than upon anatomy. Some of his rules for discriminating between species and varieties would now be of little value and must have been very unsatisfactory in his own time. For instance, it could not have been easy to form a clear conception of what is " a symp- tom of a symptom," or of "a symptom of a 222 BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. cause." The " symptoms of symptoms " have been defined as " effects which result from the symptoms of a disease, but which are not necessarily allied to the disease," and the follow- ing example is given: "thus the debility which results from the frequency of the alvine evacua- tions in dysentery is a symptom of symptoms." All this has been handed down from the time of CuUen and seemingly accepted without demur or comment on the part of the profession and re- corded by such authors as Dunglison, Littre and Robin, and other writers of eminence. From symptoms effects cannot arise, for symptoms are only manifestations of a morbid condition which is itself the effect of a cause. The idea of an ef- fect arising from a manifestation is therefore most irrational. The debility which results from such phenomena as the frequent alvine evacuations in dysentery is a consequence and not a symptom of the dysentery. The outward manifestations of dysentery are the frequent bloody alvine evacua- tions accompanied by tenesmus. The analysis of these symptoms furnishes a sign upon which to base the diagnosis of the disease. There are no ** symptoms of a cause " any more than ;here are " symptoms of symptoms." The cause produces an effect — disease — which BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. 223 effect manifests itself by certain general or local symptoms. Of late years it has been proposed to employ two classifications and nomenclatures, one for the clinician, based upon the characters of the symp- toms of disease, and one for the pathologist, to be used in the autopsy room. Such a system would be entirely unnecessary if a single classi- fication and nomenclature were placed upon a proper foundation. The modern botanical classification is based upon the reproductive organs of plants, that is, upon anatomy. Zoological classification is likewise based upon anatomical characters, and this basis was adopted to a certain extent by Buffon, notwithstanding his general opposition to methodical arrange- ment, by Pennant in his history of quadrupeds, published in 1781, and by other zoologists of their time. Looking at the inorganic world, it will be seen that the classification of minerals is based upon their chemical properties. The system adopted by the mineralogists includes classes, orders, species and varieties. The chemical nomenclature of the present, the result of more than a century of arduous labor, is based upon the composition of compound sub- 224 BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. stances, so that the name of a chemical compound generally indicates its exact composition. All systematic studies of those sciences wherein the greatest advances have been made during this century, are established each upon a rational, a substantial basis, except medicine ; and w^hy the good example set by the naturalists has not been more generally followed by medical writers, it is not easy to explain. A nosography based upon sysmptoms cannot be accurate and must necessarily fall. To be of practical utility, the classification of diseases should be based upon anatomy. This is the answer to the second question. In this work therefore, an attempt is made to raise the superstructure of nosography upon this foundation. Dr. Clymer, whose opinion was asked in rela. tion to the question of the basis of classification of diseases, writes as follows : "The first attempts towards a classification of diseases are, necessarily along the lines of symp- toms. They are the objective marks of disorder ; the salient signs that compel attention. In an early state of study, with defective knowledge of substance and its properties, they offer the one conception of departure from sound working we can have. True scientific research is bottomed BASIS OF CLASSIFICATION. 22$ on observation. The unknown cannot be made the subject of positive thought. Cognition is conditioned on experience, which comes through perception ; and a right understanding of phe- nomena must be within the limitations of ex- periences, and can be studied successfully only by this method. " When we get to a better knowledge of sub- stance, its forces, and their variations, the artifice classification, based on positive data, becomes possible. It will be more or less perfect in proportion to the degree and fulness of such knowledge. Berkeley says : ' We know a thing when we understand it ; and we understand it, when we can interpret, or tell what it signifies.' " When the square of the hypotheneuse is geometrically demonstrated, no one has a right to his own notion about it. " Facts of phenomena arise from facts of sub- stance, otherwise they are facts of fancy. Symp- toms looked at alone as such and not coupled with the suffering substance whose speech they are, and by which its troubles are told, will mis- guide or give no hint of the true state of things. Necessitated correlation of matter and force is a primal law. No change in the customary expres- sion of an activity, whether by increase, lessen- ing, arrest or perversion, may happen, without, 226 DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION. at like time, a change, coarse or fine, in the plas- mode. Hence, as a matter of fact, there can be no such thing- as mere functional disorder apart from structural damage. This would be an ab- straction, as it supposes a quality without sup- port, which is meaningless and contradictory. We can neither know, or be ignorant of an ab- stract thing. *' Facts of quantitative or qualitative disturb- ance, made known by objective or subjective tokens, can, therefore, be only truly expressed in terms of substance." DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION. Summarising what has already been stated as to the scope of nosography, it is found to include: (i,) the description; (2,) the definition; (3,) the nomenclature ; and (4,) the classification of dis- eases. The description of a disease is the setting forth, in detail, of its cause, nature, pathoanatomy, and symptoms. The definition of a disease is the statement of its peculiar, dominant, and constant characteris- tics so concisely and clearly, that it can be readily recognised. Description and definition are too often con- CHARACTER OF THE NOMENCLATURE. 22/ founded. An exact definition is the summary of an accurate description. It takes from such de- scription only what is essential to precisely characterize a disease and distinguish- it from any other disease. An exact definition can therefore be deduced from the analysis only of a complete description. In the description of a disease there may be symptoms and other conditions which are com- mon to two or to more than two diseases. To in- troduce such characters into a definition would vitiate and render it useless. The methodical nosographer first describes a morbid condition. From this description he ex- tracts the definition and from the definition ob- tains the correct name of the disease which he accordingly classifies. 3. vVHAT SHOULD BE THE CHARACTER OF THE NOMENCLATURE OF DISEASES? Nosonomy,^ or the nomenclature of diseases is that division of nosography about which there is * Nosonomy, from v66oi^ disease, and ovojuaf name. The words know and name are said to be traceable to the same root. Diseases to be properly named should therefore first be well known. 228 CHARACTER OF THE NOMENCLATURE. the least agreement among both the ancient and modern authors ; consequently, of all scientific nomenclatures, that of medicine is confessedly the most defective. Of the many good rules pre- scribed for naming diseases, few have been ob- served, and many of the most absurd and mean- ingless terms, anciently adopted, are still obstinately retained. A pernicious habit of in- accuracy among writers has been the outcome of this faulty nomenclature which now proves to be one of the greatest detriments to the science and art of medicine. Although repeatedly pointed out, no concerted international action has been taken for the remedy of this evil. The nearest approach to reformation is indicated by the work done, in the past thirty years, by the medical pro- fession of the advanced European nations, more particularly of England. Most of the labor, how- ever, was individual, and performed by the late Doctor William Farr, of London, who is entitled to the highest praise for his devotion to this sec- tion of nosography. He has done much to ad- vance nomenclature, but there remains much more of the same kind of work to be accom- plished. Sir W. Aitken, who has also given great atten- tion to the question of nomenclature, summarises ** the considerations which have generally reg- CHARACTER OF THE NOMENCLATURE. 229 ulated the naming of diseases " as follows: *'(i,) some names have been taken from the part affected — e. g., peripneumonia, podagra, opthal- mia, dysentery ; (2,) the most characteristic symptoms have furnished the name — e. g., ileus, tenesmus, paralysis, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, coma ; (3,) some names have been taken from these two circumstances combined — e. g., cephalalgia, otal- g-ia, cardialgia, odontalgia, hysteralgia ; (4,) an alteration of tissue upon which subsequent changes depend being recognised as the essen- tial element of the disease, it is named accord- ingly — e. g., pleuritis, peritonitis ; (5,) such alteration not being discovered, the first tangi- ble link in the chain of causation has been used instead — e. g., m.elancholia, cholera, typhus ; (6,) when a lesion tending to sudden death at once follows the application of a cause, that cause may name the disease — e. g., lightning, prussic acid, arsenic, scald, sun-stroke, cut, stab, frost- bite, etc. : (7,) a considerable number of names of diseases have been derived from some imaginary resemblance to external objects — e. g., elephanti- asis, cancer, polypus, anthrax, etc. ; (8,) there are still many names the origin of vi^hich it is not easy to trace." Faulty as are these and many other terms, it is extremely difficult to fill their places with suit- 230 CHARACTER OF THE NOMENCLATURE. able expressions. That this will in time be ac- complished — perhaps however not until two or three generations of physicians shall have passed away — is reasonably to be anticipated. Mean- while it is to be hoped that durmg the present generation good substitutes will be offered for such caconymous terms as podagra, rheumatism, apoplexy, melancholia, ileus, dysentery, diar- rhoea, cholera, typhus and typhoid fevers, variola, diphtheria, hydrophobia, elephantiasis, lupus, leprosy, anthrax, cancer, chancre, chan- croid, scrofula, syphilis, and a host of other equally inappropriate names of diseases. Many of these terms are used in this essay — but under protest — until, by general agreement, correct terms shall be substituted. " The perfection of a science depends, in no inconsiderable degree, upon the perfection of its language ; and the perfection of every lan- guage upon its simplicity and precision." * The language of medicine should be euphoni. ous, simple, expressive, and accurate, for, its ob- ject is not only to describe and define diseases with precision, but to mirror the medical ex- perience, wisdom, and genius of the past as well as of the present. Nosographical nomenclature * John Mason Good. CHARACTER OF THE NOMENCLATURE. 23 1 is the most important part of medical language and consists of the technical terms therein used. This nomenclature should be based upon the structural characters, of the affections of the hu- man body ; therefore the names given to diseases should convey to the mind an exact idea of the morbid conditions which these names are de~ signed to express, at least a strong endeavor should be made toward the attainment of that end.* As a general rule these names should be * " The exactness of names and the uniformity of terms render more facile and prompt the knowledge of a science, and an expressive and characteristic denomination makes a profound impression upon the mind which necessarily puts the object designated into the place of its designation."^ (Paraphrased from Condillac by Pinel.) Condilliac in commenting upon nomenclature propounded the following aphorism. " Les sciences se reduisent d des langues Hen faztes." This may be liberally translated into,, sciences may be reduced to exact language. " It is the exactness and also the good use of words, or more generally of signs, which should be considered as the criterion of the truth ; it is to their vague character, to the un- certain and confused manner in which they are employed, that should be attributed imperfect notions, prejudices, errors, and all vicious habits of the mind. " In nearly all the departments of medicine, the language is ill constructed. It has been more and more corrupted by the false application of words borrowed from the other sciences^ 232 CHARACTER OF THE NOMENCLATURE. Latin or Latinised Greek, or of Greek or Latin derivation but should not be compounded of Latin and Greek. To avoid confusion it is de- sirable that one name only be adopted lor each individual disease. When a disease already bears several names, if one of these be accurate it should be adopted to the exclusion of the super- fluous or improper names, otherwise a correct term should be coined, and the other names should be placed under the head of equivalents, synonyms, or caconyms, as the case may be. The names of men applied to diseases are ex- tremely objectionable, convey no idea of the nature of these diseases, and even fail to flatter vanity. It happens sometimes that a disease bears the names of tv\ro persons whose descrip- tion thereof is the same. May it not also happen that one and the same disease is very differently described by two or even three persons, each giv- ing his name to the disease, so that two or three diseases may be enumerated where only one exists ? The resulting confusion and perplexity would, in such a case, be most discouraging to earnest students. The fashion of giving men's and by a certain insignificant and ridiculous jargon which has too often been adopted by physicians owing to a culpable re- spect for popular prejudices." (Cabanis.) CHARACTER OF THE NOMENCLATURE. 233 names to diseases has continued through so long- a series of years that it has grown into a con- firmed and mischievous habit. If this sentimental, but mistaken, notion of honoring or of rewarding merit could have been limited, no great harm would have ensued. The evil is however already an offensive blot upon the nomenclature of medi- cine, and threatens to mar the best pages of medical literature. Will it not be a most agree- able relief to the senses of the heedful reader when authors shall have banished from their treatises such terms as Addison's disease, Base- dow's disease, Bright's disease, Charcot's disease, Duchenne's disease, Dupuytren's contraction, Graves' disease, Hodgkins' disease, Meniere's disease, Pott's disease, and very many more of kindred names which express no notion of the nature of the affections bearing such pseu- donyms ? The names of regions of country — e. g., Bar- badoes leg ; of animals — e. g., lupus, elephantia- sis ; of vegetables — e.g., hay fever; of some of the elements — e. g., St. Anthony's fire ; and other names too absurd and too numerous to particularise have been given to diseases. The same faulty nomenclature exists in the fundamental science and associated arts of medi- cine. 234 CHARACTER OF THE NOMENCLATURE. It is to be hoped that the much desired general reformation in medical nomenclature will soon begin, but the bad foundation must first be sapped by a radical change in the nomenclature of the fundamental science and associated arts of medicine. The answer to the third question is that the nomenclature of diseases, to be exact, should be based upon the true nature of morbid conditions and should be characterized by simplicity, brev- ity and accuracy. Inasmuch as many of the words employed by the earliest nosographers are now largely used, and inasmuch as their use will probably be con. tinued for a long time, it is proper that the inten- tion of their coinage be clearly understood. Doctor John Mason Good's nosology contains a full explanation of many of the terms employed by Sauvages and other contemporaneous nosog- raphers, and also a table of some of the medical prefixes and terminals with a brief statement of the senses in which they are applied. This table of prefixes and terminals is here reproduced for the benefit of those who may desire to know their exact meaning as understood when they were coined. 235 good's table of prefixes and terminals with the senses in which they ARE USED * Prefixes. A, («), Diminution or less quality or power. fFor the most part A^^ „^ u t ^ ^ ^ iterative, duplicate^ rff.' ^?;f ■ * V ' ^''^ or augmented ac: tion : but often m^ determinate. Cata, cat, {>iaraj nar). Dia, (<5ta), Separation ; secernment ; or secretion. Dys, (5i»5), Morbid state or action generally, em- phatical, when accompanied with dis- tress or difficulty. Ec, ex, (£«, £^), ] r^ i. f 4. J Epi, ep, eph, (£^z, £^, £^), t ^"t «f; outwards r Hyper, (^^£^), f «^^^*' ^^ove. Hj^po, {v7to), Under. En, (er), Within ; below ; applied to places. Su- periority ; excess or intensity ; applied to quantity or quality. * A more extended table of prefixes and terminals is to be found at the end of Volume I, of Piorry's " Trate de Medi- cine Pratique et de Pathologie latrique ou Medicate,. Generalites." 1841. 236 PREFIXES AND TERMINALS. Para, {itapa), Morbid state or action generally ; and hence synonymous with dys\ except in a few terms derived from anatomy, in which it imports apud^ " bordering on," as in parotitis, pa- ronychia. Peri, {itepi), Circuit; circumference. Terminals. Algia, {aXyia)^ Pain or ache. "] Morbid action, pow- Asmus, osmus, {a6^a, odjuoi) | er, or possession Esmus, ismus, (£(^mo?, idjao^), \- generally ; but Esis, osis, {e6i?, (iodi<^)j mostly very inde- terminate. lasis, {ladii)^ Cutaneous eruption, unconnected with fever as its cause. Itis, {iri7^), Organic inflammation. Kele, cele, i^i'n'^v), Covered protrusion of a soft part. Odes, (ta^T^s), Like ; akin to. Oma, (o^ywa), External protuberance. Ptoma, {TtTGo^ia)^ Naked prolapse of a soft part. Rhoea, (/^oza), Preternatural flux of any fluid ex- cept blood. Rhagia, {pocyia)^ Preternational flux of blood. METHOD OF THE CLASSIFICATION. 23/ Latin terminals. Igo, Diffuse or migratory action or motion. rn ' • \ ' \ Simple diminutive terminations, lilaris, ularis, j ^ Osus, Simple augmentive termination. 4. WHAT SHOULD BE THE METHOD OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES? Nosotaxy or the classification of diseases. — The fourth division of nosography relates to the grouping of those diseases that have been de- scribed, defined, and named, and to their arrange- ment into distinct classes, orders, genera, and species. This is called taxonomy * or classifica- tion. Next to nomenclature, classification has exhib- ited the most diversified and incongruous views. At the close of the last, and in the beginning of this century, classification was in such fashion that ^M^rj prominent physician thought himself bound to construct a new classfication of dis- eases. The result was that no two systems agreed ; and that nearly all classifiers not only repeated the * Taxonomy, from ra'^z?, arrangement, and v6/ioi, a law; and, for the sake precision and brevity, nosotaxy, the classifi- cation of diseases. ^38 METHOD OF THE CLASSIFICATION. heresies of their predecessors, but often made greater mistakes, so that nosograpby soon fell into disrepute and contempt. The excessive ^eal displayed b)'' many of these classifiers in en- deavoring* to promote nosography, and their pre- mature publication of imperfect and ill digested systems, are among the main causes of the re. tardation of its progress. Sir W. Aitken, in his warm advocacy of meth- ical arrangement, predicts a glorious future for nosography. He says, under the head *' principles of classi- fication " : " A perfectly philosophical or natural system of classification aims at having the details of its plan to agree in every respect with the facts as they exist in nature, and to be as it were a * trans- lation of the thoughts of the Creator into the language of man.' To effect this end, arrange- ments, as they naturally exist, require to be traced out, not devised. The tracts in which our knowledge is as yet deficient, may be shortly in- dicated under the following heads: (i,) the affinities or alliances of diseases with each other ; (2,) the morbid anatomy of diseased parts? (3,) the communication, propagation, inoculation, generation, development, course, and spontaneous natural termination of diseases ; (4,) the connec- METHOD OF THE CLASSIFICATION. 239 tion of the phenomena recognised during life with the facts of morbid anatomy ; (5,) the geo- graphical distribution of diseases ; (6,) the suc- cession of diseases, so far as they can be traced through past ages ; the peculiarities they have exhibited at different periods in the world's his- tory, or within comparatively recent cycles of years. "But," he further says, "the time has not yet come for a classification on a basis so comprehensive — simply because the material does not yet exist; and attempts to make so- called natural systems of arrangement must end in disappointment, on account of the uncertain and fluctuating data on which they must be based." It is true that the whole of the material does not yet, and may never, exist for " a perfectly philosophical or natural system of classification," but there is enough good material at hand, which, if wisely used, will greatly improve the present systems of classification. It surely is not the part of wisdom to wait an indefinite time to begin this work. Had the early nosographers waited for the " proper time to come," this science would, to-day, scarcely be in existence. But they quickly made use of such material as was then at hand and their labors have led largely to the advances which are at present enjoyed. 240 METHOD OF THE CLASSIFICATION. The succeeding generations of nosographers wil doubtless profit by the good work — and by the errors too — of the preceding, and it may possibly be many centuries before the fond hope of Sir W. Aitken can be realised, but the beginning should be made now. The task of improving the classification of dis- eases may be begun by individuals, but individual labor should, with good grace, be submitted to the criticism and correction of other individuals and of organized associations of the medical pro- fession, first of the country of these individuals, then of all countries of the world. The study of the nosography of the past, show- ing, as it does, such great diversity in the many systems, such lack of agreement among the no- sographers, such confusion in classification, and such eccentricity in nomenclature, must needs lead to the conclusion that it is not possible, in the existing state of medical science, for any one person, or for a single association, or even for the medical profession of one or of several nations to produce a complete general nosography. The un- successful efforts already made in this direction for the past century and a half are good evi- dences of the correctness of this proposition. Many individuals may each prepare the nosog- raphy of one apparatus of the human body and METHOD OF THE CLASSIFICATION. 24I thus doubtless give substantial aid in the cause of nosography and contribute thereto much valua- ble material ; but, in view of the progressive character of medical science, the details of all such work must necessarily be provisional and constantly subjected to alterations and revisions. The final decision of questions relating to the general principles of nosography, and tending to make the nomenclature of medicine uniform in all countries, should be made by an assembly of representant physicians of all nations, through in- ternational conferences, so that every individual member of the medical profession may know that his voice shall be heard for or against the adop- tion of any proposed method of nomenclature and classification of the diseases of man. By this means only can a comprehensive system of no- sography be compiled which will be of practical utility to all nations for the purposes of vital statistics and of the medical reports of armies, navies, and general hospitals, or for the use of students, teachers and investigators. The answer to the fourth question is that the excellent method of classification, borrowed from the botanists, by the early medical classifiers, should be re-adopted with the modifications in- dicated below. If the majority of the medical profession of the 242 METHOD OF THE CLASSIFICATION. world should decide in favor of classifying the diseases of the human body, as heretofore, like systems of botany, it would seem rational to base the classification upon anatomy in its broadest sense ; and such a basis is the one which offers the greatest advantages and the widest scope in theory and in practice. A knowledge of the gross appearances and of the construction and re- lations of the several parts of the body ; of the minute structure of the tissues and organs ; of the development and abnormities of the organs; of the functions of the apparatuses ; and of the nature of morbid conditions, is of the utmost im- portance. Nay more, a mastery of these various branches of anatomy is essential to the study of the natural history of diseases. By its aid, all de- viations from the normal state of the body or any part thereof are at once recognised. It remains only to differentiate these abnormal conditions and to define, name, and classify them. These, it seems, are sufficient grounds for the adoption of the anatomical basis for the nosography of man. It is therefore suggested that all diseases, in- juries, and congenital abnormities be grouped into families, one family for each apparatus of the body, and one or more than one family for general diseases. Some of the families should have two or more than two branches, and fami- METHOD OF THE CLASSIFICATION. 243 lies and their branches should be divided into classes, orders, genera, species, sub-species, varie- ties and sub-varieties. It is of the utmost importance that, in the med- ical profession, there be a consense of views con- cerning not only nomenclature and methodical arrangement but also the use of the terms of classification. Notwithstanding the fact that the early nosographers indicated, as best suited to the purposes of nosography, the simple arrange- ment of diseases into classes, orders, genera, species, and varieties, the most recent of the modern medical classifiers begins with classes and after orders introduces " sub-orders, tribes, and families," next to which he places genera, species, and varieties. Such a method only leads to confusion, complication, and uncertainty. Sim- ilar methods have been tried in medicine and found wanting in clearness and accuracy. The plan proposed in this work does not in- clude sub-orders, or tribes. Families are applied to the groups of diseases dwelling in the appara- tuses of the body. The nosographer who lays before the profes. sion a system of classification is in duty bound to give an exact definition of each and every term of classification which he employs, in order that he may be rightly understood. 244 QUESTIONS FOR THE TENTH Only those terms of classification that are ap- proved by the medical profession should be used in a special or in a general nosography. The sooner the question of method is put to a vote, after free discussion in an association rep- resenting the medical profession of the whole world, the better it will be for the cause of ac- curate nomenclature and classification. Therefore the following questions are sug- gested for discussion at the Tenth International Medical Congress. 1. Shall there be instituted an International system of nomenclature and classification of the diseases of man ? 2. If so, what shall be the basis of this nomen- clature and classification ? 3. What shall be the character of the nomen- clature ? 4. What shall be the method of the classifica- tion ? 5. What shall be the nature of the terms used in the classification ? 6. Shall these terms be defined ? In case the first question — shall there be insti- tuted an international system of nomenclature INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS. 245 and classification of the diseases of man? — be de- cided in the affirmative, it is further suggested : 1. That the International Medical Congress es- tablish a permanent section on the nomenclature and classification of the diseases of man, to be composed of physicians and surgeons represent- ing the medical profession of all nations. 2. That all national medical associations like- wise establish each a section on the nomenclature and classification of diseases, composed of physi- cians and surgeons representing different regions of country, in order that their knowledge of the peculiarities presented by disease in differing climates may be made available in the work to be accomplished. 3. That state, city, and special medical associa- tions, through their presiding officers, each ap- point a committee on the nomenclature and classification of diseases. — This can be effected without, in any way, deranging the machinery of these associations. 4. That the city and special associations report to the State Associations such action as they may take upon the proceedings of their committees. 5. That the reports of the city and special associations be embodied in the report of the 246 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS. State committee, and the consolidated reports be presented to the State Association for action and transmission to the national association. 6. That the national association refer the state report to the national section on nomenclature, etc., for a report after careful examination and free discussion. The report to be acted upon by the National Association and forwarded, or pre- sented by a delegate, to the section on nomen- clature and classification of the International Medical Congress. 7. That the section on nomenclature and classi- fication of the International Medical Congress then revise the several national reports, consoli- date them, and present their conclusions to the Congress whose decision thereon should be final. These suggestions are made in the belief that they point to a fair method of obtaining the views and the vote of the whole medical profession on a subject of the vastest importance to mankind, and also to the most expeditious way to attain the desired end of compiling a uniform nomen- clature and classification of diseases that may be of practical utility to all nations. 247 DEFINITIONS OF THE TERMS OF CLASSIFICATION. The following definitions of the terms of classi- fication are modeled upon botanical nomencla- ture, except those of family, class, and order, which do not here occupy the same relative posi- tions as in works on Botany and Zoology. 1. Families of diseases.'*' — A family is a group of diseases dwelling in an apparatus of the human body and affectmg, in a greater or less degree, the organs of this apparatus and consequently its function. Therefore affections of the organs of an apparatus, and also general diseases affecting several apparatuses at once, should be grouped into families. 2. Branches of families. — A branch of a family of diseases is a division of the family predicated upon affections peculiar to sex ; as in the case of the family of affections of the uro-genital appara- tus which should be divided into two branches, (i,) andrology, (2,) gynaecology; or upon the * Family, — ixovafamilia, a family, and famulus, a servant, and SjxtXta, an assembly, and the Hebrew word which means to labor, — is the most general term, being those who are bound together upon the principle of dependence. Family includes in it every circumstance of connexion and relationship. (Crabb.) 248 DEFINITIONS OF THE affections of an apparatus which includes two, or more than two subsidiary apparatuses, as in the cases of the cephalo-rhachidian, nutritive, and cutaneous apparatuses. 3. Classes!^ — A class of diseases is ordinarily defined as a division of diseases grouped together on account of their common characteristics. In this case, however, the term class is used to signify a group of diseases which, though possess- ing different characteristics, affect a particular organ. In this system, therefore, the classes have reference to, and bear the anatomical denomina- tion of, the organs of an appparatus. 4. Orders.^ — Kw order is an association of genera or a group of the general morbid condi- tions of allied affections of particular organs. The orders, therefore, refer to the general de- * Class, from classis very probably from the Greek nXocdii, a fraction, division, or class. Class is more general than order. " Classification is a branch of philosophy which is not attaina- ble by art only, it requires a mind peculiarly methodical by nature, that is capable of distinguishing things by their generic and specific differences ; not separating things that are alike ; nor blending things that are different." (Crabb.) t Order, from ordo, from opx^'^y a row, which is a species of order, is applied to everything which is disposed. The order lies in consulting the time, the place and the object, so as to make them accord. (Crabb.) TERMS OF CLASSIFICATION. 249 nomination of the morbid condition of the organs of an apparatus. 5. Genera!^ — A genus is an assemblage of spe- cies possessing certain characters in common. The genera, therefore, refer to the particular de- nomination of the morbid condition of the organs of an apparatus. A single species having distinctive characters that seem of more than specific value may con- stitute a genus. 6. Species.\ — A species is a permanent series of similar individual affections associated on account of their common properties. These properties are to be determined only by the closest observa- tion of abnormal conditions of the human body. Species, says Cullen, " are ready made by na- ture" (he would have been more exact had he said, the individual diseases which constitute species are ready made by nature) ; the nosog- * Genus, from gignere, from yevstv, to engender, " is a class of objects divided into several subordinate species." (Webster.) t Species, from spicere, to behold, signifies literally the form or appearance, and in an extended sense that which comes under a particular form. Species is a term used by philosophers, classing things according to their exiernal or in- ternal properties." (Crabb.) 250 DEFINITIONS OF THE rapher has only to discover and name them, but the orders and genera he must construct — not according to fancy, but to reason and to definite rules. Species are therefore named in accordance with the general specific properties of the affec- tions of the organs of an apparatus. 7. Sub-species. — A sub-species is a subordinate species, possessing distinctive characters that arc of more specific value than those of a variety. On this account it occupies a middle position be- tween the species and the variety. 8. Varieties!^ — A variety is a form of species possessing peculiarities that differentiate it from the typical characteristics of the species. The varieties are therefore named in accordance with the particular specific properties of the affections of the organs of an apparatus. 9. Stib-varieties. — A sub-variety is a subordinate variety or a division of a variety. It may indi- cate morbid properties differing in their charac- teristics from those typical of varieties, or may * Variety, from varius which probably comes from varus a speck or speckle, because this is the best emblem of variety. Variety seems to lie in the things themselves. A variety can- not exist without an assemblage. Variety strikes on the mind, and pleases the imagination with many agreeable images; it is opposed to dull- ««2/ic?rwi/y." (Crabb.) TERMS OF CLASSIFICATION. 2$ I indicate the special cause of the affection. The sub-varieties, therefore, relate partly to the spe- cial character and partly to the aetiology of the affections of the organs of an apparatus. 10. Symptoms^' — A symptom is a manifestation of disease. It is perceptible to the senses, even of the patient. 11. Signs. — The sign of a disease is the indica- tion of its presence. It may be (i,) a sign per se, indicating disease apart from symptoms, or (2,) an inferential sign deduced from the analysis of a symptom or of a group of symptoms. The symptoms and signs, without which ac- curate classification would be impossible, serve to detect individual diseases and establish species, and from the species the classification is con- structed, for out of them spring the genera and the orders, the varieties and the sub-varieties. Therefore the position of symptoms and signs is next in order to the fundation stone of no- sography. Symptoms of diseases, being their manifesta- tions or those phenomena which are apparent to the senses of the observer or even of the patient, * Symptom, from 6vVf with, and ictjerstv, to fall. To fall in with. Any perceptible change in the human body. 252 TERMS OF CLASSIFICATION. differ very materially from the signs, these being deduced from the analysis of the symptoms. Therefore the symptoms are noticeable by any- body, but unless rightly interpreted are generally of little value. It is only the wise and experi- enced physician, after analyzing a group of symp- toms and properly interpreting them, who can perceive what is correctly termed the sign of a disease.* * The following note is paraphrased from Double's " Se?ne~ iologie Generale. A collection of symptoms properly analyzed becomes the sign of a disease. The sign is a conclusion which the mind draws from the symptoms thus analyzed. Therefore the sign belongs to the understanding and the symptom to the senses. The sign of a disease may exist with- out symptoms. It is said by Fernel that all symptoms are signs but that all signs are not symptoms. Symptoms are observed only in disease, but there are signs which belong to health. It is not generally said that a man shows symptoms of health, but that he shows signs of health. 253 SECTION V. REVIEW OF THE MORBID STATES AND MORBIFIC PROCESSES. THE BACTERIA, PTOMAINES, LEUCOMAINES, AND EXTRACTIVES. Analysis of some of the terms used in general pathology and of those contained in the synopsis of morbid states and morbific processes, together with remarks on these stales and processes. Summary of the present state of knowl- edge of the bacteria, ptomaines, leucomaines, and " extrac- tives." The relations borne, to medicine and surgery, by these microorganisms and alkaloids of putridity. Classifications of the bacteria, ptomaines and leucomaines. Uniformity in their nomenclature and classification much needed. Remarks on the neoplasms and on their classification. As already stated, the synopsis of morbid states and morbific processes is intended as a suggestion of a ground-work for the classification of diseases, but inasmuch as new terms are therein proffered, and changes, tending to greater precision, made in many of those that are in general use, some explanation is due respecting the nature of the new words and the foundation of the changes in the old terms. Therefore most of the terms contained in the synopsis will now be defined, analyzed and, as far as practicable, reasons given for their introduction. 254 ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. In this attempt to correct defective words and to coin new terms, prefixes and terminals which are in general use will be employed, such as hyper which signifies over, above, excess, and will be applied in the sense of increase, and hypo which signifies under, below, and will be applied in the sense of decrease. The terminal aemiay from ai}ia, blood, will be employed in preference to osis so often improperly used in that connec- tion. The middle section of each term com- pounded of three roots will also be explained and its etymology given in a foot note. I. ALTERATIONS IN THE QUANTITY, QUALITY, AND COMPOSITION OF THE BLOOD. I. Hyperaemia* is here used in its strict signi- fication of a superabundance of blood, an in- crease of its whole quantity in the body, and is offered to replace '■'plethora vera,' poly- aemia, and hyperaematosis. Hyperaemia has often been wrongly employed to signify local congestion or the accumulation of blood in the capillary vessels, or even inflammation. In the Lexicon of Medicine, etc., of the New Sydenham Society, London 1886, hyperaemia is defined as * vitipt over, above, excess, and atjxa, blood. Above the normal amount of blood. ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. 2$ 5 *' an excessive amount of blood in the vessels of a part ; a local overfilling of the blood-vessels, so that they are distended with blood and give more or less increased redness to the part, with some swelling. When hyperaemia continues there may be oedema of the part from effusion of serum, or there may be haemorrhage." There is nothing in this definition, or rather description^ to indicate general overplus of blood. It is, in reality, a definition of congestion whose proper place is under the caption of disturbances in the circulatory apparatus. 2. Hypoaemia,* meaning an insufficiency of blood, a decrease of its whole quantity in the body, is introduced in place of anaemia which literally signifies absence of blood. The inten- tion in the coinage of the word anaemia was to express the idea of a lessening of the red blood cells, and it has failed to do so. The privative alpha in this, and in many other words to which it is affixed, leading to misconception of the con- dition intended to be designated. Therefore all w^ords so prefixed should be rejected, except where the a is absolutely needed, as in atrophy^ when cessation of nutrition is intended to be ex- * From vTtOy under, beneath, below, and aipta, blood. Be- low the normal amount of blood. 256 ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. pressed, and in local anaemia when there is literally no blood in the capillary vessels of a part; e. g., local capillary anaemia caused by ischaemia arising from constriction of the capil- laries, the plugging of a neighboring arteriole, etc. The term hypoaemia was formerly used to in- dicate the presence of blood in the anterior chamber of the eye, although there is not a sylla- ble in this word to show that it has reference to the eye. Hypoaemia was also used synonym- ously with ecchymosis, sugillatio. "Anaemia, used {by the French) S3monymously with oligaemia, is a want, or deficiency of blood ; the condition of the body after great loss of blood; exsan- guinity. There may either be a defect in the to- tal quantity of blood, as occurs for a short time, perhaps, after profuse haemorrhages, or a dimi- nution in the relative amount of red corpuscles as compared with the other constituents of the fluid, as in chlorosis." * This mixed definition, not of anaemia, but of hypoaemia, hypoerythrocythaemia, hyperhy- draemia and hypohydraemia, is very confused and confusing. * Lexicon of Medicine, etc. New Sydenham Society. ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. 25/ 3. Hyperhydraemia* signifies increase of blood- water which is not indicated by the commonly used word hydraemia whose meaning is simply blood-water, although it has been defined, by high authorities, " as a watery condition of the blood depending on defect of albumen and fibrin, or on retention of water from arrest of the cu- taneous or renal secretions." Hyperhydraemia is the outcome, of profuse haemorrhage, exhausting diseases, or starvation. 4. Hypohydraemia signifies decrease of blood- water, and is the outcome of those diseases in which much water is consumed in, or discharged from, the body, as in cholera, erysipelas, acute articular rheumatism, puerperal fever, typhus and typhoid fevers, conditions producing poly- uria, etc. To express the idea of deficiency of serum in the blood, Piorry adopted the term anhydraemia which means absence of blood-water and is there- fore inexact. 5. Hyperinosaemiaf signifies increase in the tendency to the formation of blood-fibrin, while hyperinosis indicates " over activity of muscular fibre." The term hyperinosis was suggested by * ijdoop, water. t vitep, excess, i'i, i'roi, muscle, fibre, and at/ia, blood. 258 ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. F. Simon to express the idea of " excess of fibrin in the blood ; such as occurs in acute rheuma- tism and in erysipelas, when it may amount to upwards of one per cent." But this, like many other imperfectly constructed terms, fails to con- vey the intended idea, unless the final is be re- placed by aemiuy 6. Hypoinosacmia signifies decrease in the tendency to the formation of blood-fibrin. Flint* uses the term hypinosis to signify imperfect coagulation of the blood, but it really means de- creased activity of muscular fibre. Hypoinosaemia appears to be the more exact term. " It has been observed in some acute infectious diseases, in acute icterus, in death from asphyxia, and in death from certain poisons, such as sulphuretted hydrogen and hydrocyanic acid." 7. Hyperleucontaemia signifies increase of blood-albumen.f There being no Greek word for albumen, the term leucontaemia is offered to signify blood-albumen, from A.«v«ov, white of Ggg, which is albumen. * A. Flint, Principles and Practice of Medicine. 1886. t The substance formerly called albumen of the blood is in reality serine and metalbumen. {Flint's Physiology.) ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. 2$^ 8. Hypoleucontaemia signifies decrease of blood-albumen. Hypoalbuminosis, a hybrid word and therefore inadmissible, has been used ta designate a deficiency of albumen in the blood. A condition existing in starvation or after a co- pious haemorrhage. 9. Hyperalonaemia* signifies increase of blood- salts. 10. Hypoalonaemia signifies decrease of blood- salts. These alterations in the quantity of the saline elements of the blood play an important part in diseases. 11. Hyperchromataemiaf signifies increase of blood-color. The coloring matter of the red corpuscles of the blood is called haemaglobine which is a hybrid word. It is sometimes dif- fused in the blood owing to disintegration of the red corpuscles, and thus the blood is increased in color. The term haemoglobinaemia is used to designate this condition, but its composition ren- ders it hybrid as well as tautological. It is taken from ai'/iict, blood, globulus^ globule, and the term- inal ai'fxay blood. Hyperchromataemia seems to^ indicate clearly an increase in the blood-color. It * vita'py increase, ocXi, aXoov (genitive plural), salt salts,. and ai'/xa, blood. f xpoojiioCf color. 26o ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. is for the pathoanatomist and clinician to de- termine and interpret its causes and effects. 12. Hypochromataemia signifies decrease of blood-color. As there is increase, so, in all prob- ability, many circumstances arise to cause a de- crease in the color of the blood. 13. Hyperleucocythaemia signifies increase of white blood-cells. Leucocythaemia* is the term ordinarily used, but it only means white blood- cells, and expresses a normal condition. The other terms, leucocytosis and lukaemia, sug- gested by Virchow are quite as indefinite ; the latter meaning white blood, which is lymph* This eminent pathoanatomist adopts the word leucocytosis to express the idea of a temporary increase in the number of white corpuscles, but the term entirely fails to convey such an idea. In the case of a great and permanent increase of white blood-cells he uses leucocythaemia or lukaemia, both equally misleading. In hyperleucocythaemia, the red blood-cells are generally decreased in number, so that the two conditions hyperleucocythaemia and hy- poerythrocythaemia occur in conjunction. Hypoxanthine has been found in considerable * Xevxoif white, Mvdrti, pouch, bag, — cell. ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. 261 quantity in cases of hyperleucocythaemia. (Gamgee,) 14. Hypoleucocythaemia signifies decrease of white blood-cells. 15. Hypererythrocythaemia* signifies increase ot red blood-cells. Plethora,t plerosis, — meaning repletion, and intended to mean a superabund- ance of blood in the system but failing to do so ; hence the division of plethora into general and local, — hyperaemia, polyaemia, polycythaemia, polyhyperaemia (!), angioplerosis, erythraemia (red blood), have all been used, improperl}'- of course, to designate increase of red blood-cells, 16. Hypoerythrocythaemia signifies decrease of red blood-cells. Anaemia is generally, and im- properly, used to express this condition. An- aemia literally means absence of blood, and should be restricted to the expression of the idea of local absence of blood, — local anaemia, — such as occurs in ischaemia which may be a temporary or a permanent arrest of blood in a part, the lat- ter arising from constriction of the capillaries, from plugging of a neighboring arteriole, or from some other cause. ♦ epvQpoS, red. t Plethora, from xXrfBoi, a great number. 262 ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. 17. Hyperlipaemia signifies increase of blood- fat, and is generally called lipaemia (blood-fat), a normal condition which is very variable in the blood-plasma. It increases after the ingestion of fatty substances until the blood may acquire a milky appearance. Fat has been known to in- crease in the blood of diabetics, in certain affec- tions of the liver, in phthisis, in chronic alcohol- ism, and in fat embolism. 18. Hypolipaemia signifies decrease of blood- fat. 19. Hyperphysaemia signifies increase of blood- gas. The gases which exist normally in the blood are carbon dioxyde, oxygen, and nitrogen, either in solution, or in combination with organic or inorganic compounds. Their increase gives rise to abnormal states which will not here be discussed. The reader is therefore referred for further information on this interesting subject to Paul Bert's experiments, and to works on general pathology in which are found articles on the ef- fects of high atmospheric pressure, air embolism, etc. 20. Hypophysaemia signifies decrease of blood- gas. The ill effects of this condition are fully treated of in the works to which allusion has been made above. But a word may be said in ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. 263 reference to the effects of rarefaction of the at- mosphere on the respiration and on the blood, such as are felt during the ascent of high moun- tains. The name of the " mountain disease or anoxyaemia " has been given to the condition of individuals who, thus breathing an insufficient amount of oxygen, take more but shorter inspira- tions than normally, suffer head-ache, epistaxis and other haemorrhages, and are soon overcome by fatigue, cold, sleep, and in some cases by death. The same phenomena occur during baloon ascensions. A notable instance is re- corded by Tissandier, sole survivor of three who had ascended to a great height in the baloon Zenith."^ Jourdanet has published an interesting work, in two volumes, upon the influence of at- mospheric pressure on the life of man, based upon a long experience and many observations made principally in Mexico. f 21. Hyperglycaemia signifies increase of blood- sugar. Glycaemia, blood-sugar, is a normal con- dition. It is only when the sugar exceeds in amount two parts and a half in one thousand of blood that it causes any disturbance. It then * Academie des Sciences 25 Avril 1875, La relation de M. G. Tissandier, seul survivant. t Sur I'influence de la pression de I'air sur la vie de rhomme» Paris 1875. 264 ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. shows itself in the urine and constitutes what is known as glycosuria. It arises from the disas« similation of certain alimentary substances. 22. Hypoglycaemia signifies decrease of blood- sugar. 23. Acetonaemia signifies acetone in the bloods That acetone is found in the blood in connection with disease is not doubted, but its exact import is still unsettled. On the other hand it has been asserted that '' acetone is a normal product of tissue metamorphosis." 24. Ammoniaemia signifies ammonia in the blood. Ammonium carbonate is formed in stag- nant, decomposed urine in the pelves of the kid- neys or in the bladder, and absorbed and carried into the circulation, or may be absorbed from the intestines. In cases of stagnation of urine in the bladder, a bacterial ferment is said to have been discovered which possesses the property of con- verting urea into ammonium carbonate. This ferment is often introduced from without through the use of unclean catheters. "It was suggested by Frierichs, in 1852, that uraemic phenomena are due to the conversion of urea into ammonium carbonate in the blood, but there is no ground for believing that such conver- sion actually occurs during life." (Gamgee.) ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. 265 25. Hyperuraemia signifies increase of blood- urea. Uraemia means blood-urea, but it is generally used in the sense of accumulation in the blood of the elements of the urine. May not the group of phenomena called urinary in- toxication be due to the accumulation in the blood, of acetone together with ammonium car- bonate, urea, and other deleterious excrementi- tious substances, such as the " extractives " ? In an experimental study of the poisonous prop- erties of the urine of different animals, Charrin concludes " that the urea is not the toxic agent of the urine." Hyperuraemia indicates the increase of a nor- mal constituent of the blood (urea). 26. Hypouraemia signifies decrease of blood- urea. 27. Hyperuricaemia signifies increase of blood- uric acid. Flint first suggested the term uric- aemia which simply means blood-uric acid, and Murchison adopted the word lithaemia (from Xi'Qoij stone), stone in the blood, meaning uric acid in the blood which is a normal condition. A great increase of uric acid in the blood has been observed by Garrod in the disease called gout. 266 ALTERATIONS OF THE BLOOD. 28. Hypouricaemia signifies decrease of blood- uric acid. 29. Cholaemia signifies bile in the blood. In morbid conditions where the exit of the bile from the liver is impeded, the bile is absorbed by the lymphatics and carried into the circulation. The constituents of the bile creating certain toxic ef- fects, and the bilirubin staining most of the tis- sues of the body and producing the condition known as icterus or jaundice. 30. Hypercholesteraemia signifies increase of blood-cholesterin. Flint jr. asserted, in 1862, *' that the cholesterin of bile is a result of an ex- cretory function of the liver not previously recognised, and that it is an excrementitious principle derived chiefly from the disassimilation of nervous tissue," and has given the name of cholesteraemia to the accumulation of cholesterin in the blood. He attributes grave toxic effects to such accumulation. Up to the present date Doctor Flint holds the same opinion on this sub- ject. Some of the French, English and German writers take issue with Doctor Flint in his view that hypercholesteraemia is capable of producing the toxic effects attributed to " grave-jaundice." 31. Hypocholesteraemia signifies decrease of blood-cholesterin. SEPTICAEMIA, PTOMAINES. 26/ 32. Melanaemia signifies black pigment in the blood. The different views respecting the pro- duction of this condition will not here be dis- cussed. The reader is therefore referred to works on general pathology.* 33. Septicaemia f signifies putrid infection of the blood. This is due to infection of the blood with the poisons of putrefied animal substances. These animal poisons are now known to be alkaloidal, and are named ptomaines, from Tcroo/xa, cadaver, and zV, in, eV, within, opposed, to e'k without. The terminal in, or ine, is ordinarily employed by chemists to designate alcaloids. There is nothing in this etymology to denote an alkaloid, therefore ptomaine is not a word of precision. if The ptomaines may be evolved in severely in- jured parts of the human body followed by rapid decomposition, before suppuration takes place, or in blood effused in the great cavities of the * There are other changes in the constituents of the blood, but they are not sufficiently well known to be here considered, t From 6r}7tTo Fibromata, scribed tumors. S e. Epithelial elements, forming a^j particular tissue, without mixture f tt of other elements. Transition to | (^ heterology. J broca's synopsis. 351 Sub-class II. — Homoeomorphous and heterologous productions, I. Fibrous and fibro-plas- ttt * . ' * • * • .. , ^ . u » 1 Warty tumors of cicatrices, tic elements in about equal •( a * • 1 . u 1 . I Anatomical tuberculous tumors. " P [ Certain fungi of the dura mater. 2. Autogenous and permanent fibro-plastic ele- < nuclear, ments Fibroids. \ fibrillary. 3. Autogenous epithelial elements. ... \ °, ., !?'... T7^;*u^i,««,o \ of the mucous Epithelioma, j . ^ f membranes. 4. Disks with multiple nuclei or myeloplaxes )y, 1 • j. forming the autogenous clement. . . . ' \ ^ Simple melanosis 5. Autogenous pigmentary elements. \ (rare in man, com- mon in the horse). '1 6. Elements of entirely new formation ) Pseudadenomata imitating the form of glandular culs-de- > (or heteradeno- sac, but forming a heterologous tissue. . . ) mata.) 352 broca's synopsis. CLASS II. — Heteromorphous Productions (all are heterologous). A. Accidental productions forming part of the economy. 1. Tumors of a high organization, and of a greater or less vascularity of their own, containing specific ele- ments called cancerous elements, pure or mixed with adventitious elements : Cancers. 2. Tumors of a much lower organization, deprived of vessels and containing specific elements called tuber- culous elements : Tubercles. B. Accidental heteromorphous production which does not form a part of the economy : Pus. CLASS III. — Amorphous Productions. ' of gelatiniform matter Simple colloid. of very small corpuscles which belong neither [ Syphilitic to nuclei nor to cells ) gummata. of coagulated fibrin, without ( a^x-,,^ „i .„ ^t ♦u ^ ^ A ^ ai^ cu ^ Active clots of the ar- o { tendency to fibrous or nbro- < <. • „ e cu' , . •' . .. ) teries or of aneurysms. "' plastic organization ( ^ of fat granules, cholesterincrys-l Cretacious. atheroma- tals. sundry crystals, and cal- calcareous, and sah?"'.^". ..." .Tr"'!" j ^°P^^^ ^"P°^^'^' ^^^• CLASS IV. — Encysted Parasitic Animals. Hydatids. NEOPLASMS. 355 Cornil and Ranvier make some improvement on the preceding arrangements, but instead of gathering together like genera, they rank as or- ders several of these genera. They divide the ** tumors " into ten groups as follows : * Group I. — " Comprises tumors formed of a tissue analogous to embryonic tissue. We might employ a new word to indicate this analogy, but we prefer to make use of the old word sarcoma, though it has been employed in very different senses by different authors. This group only contains one genus, sarcoma, of which there are a great number of species and varieties. Group II. — "Contains tumors formed of a tis- sue, the type of which is found in connective tissue. This tissue is sometimes mucous, and the tumor is called myxoma, sometimes fibrous and called fibroma (Verneuil), or inoma, from t'ro?, fibre (Paget), sometimes adipose, when called lipoma. In some cases the tissue under- goes hypertrophic aberration affecting the size of the cells ; this is the case in carcinoma, which * Cornil and Ranvier, Manual of Pathological Histology, second edition. Translated by A. M. Hart. London 1882. Na change in Cornil and Ranvier's classification of tumors has been made since their first edition which was published in 1869. 354 NEOPLASMS. would be better called alveolar fibroma ; in others, the cells atrophy, as in tubercle, glanders and syphilitic gummata. This second group therefore contains the varieties myxoma, fibroma, lipoma, carcinoma, tubercle, glanders, and syphil- itic gummata. Group III. — "Contains tumors formed of car- tilaginous tissue, of which there is but one genus, chondroma. Group IV. — *' Is composed of tumors formed of osseous tissue, osteoma. Group V. — " Tumors, formed of muscular tis- sue or myoma, are divided into two kinds, ac- cording as the fibres of new formations are striated or non-striated : myoma of striated fibres, myoma of non-striated fibres. Group VT. — "Tumors formed of nervous tis- sue are of two varieties : the medullary neuroma containing nerve cells, and the fasciculated neuroma containing nerve tubes. Group VII. — " In this are tumors formed of blood-vessels, or angioma. Group VIII. — " Contains tumors composed of lymphatic vessels, lymphangioma, and those which reproduce the structure of lymphatic glands, lymphadenoma. Group IX. — •' Contains tumors composed of NEOPLASMS. 355 epithelium of new formation. They are divided into four varieties according as the cells are ar- ranged in irregular masses, epithelioma, or in papillae, papilloma, or in culs-de-sac, adenoma, or in cavities of new formation, cysts. Group X. —Contains mixed tumors, containing^ a great number of tissues ; they are found specially during intra-uterine life." Cornil and Ranvier* say ** We wish to treat simply from the histological point of view, and have therefore included under the head of inflammation and haemorrhage what seemed to us to rightly belong to them, blood-tumors, hy- gromata, for example. We also think we have a right to reproach Virchow with having invented new words, drawn from gross physical characters, whereby to designate certain tumors, instead of employing words representative of the tissues. Thus he uses the word psammoma to signify a tumor of the meninges, because it contains cal- careous granules similar to fine sand, and the word glioma is applied to tumors of the brain because they are of a consistency analogous to glue. He thus departs from the classification which Miiller's law suggests, and which we in- tend to follow absolutely." * Op. cit. pp. 123-124. 3S6 NEOPLASMS. At page 125, the same authors write: "The classification of tumors which we propose differs, it will be seen, notably from those hitherto pub- lished. It is an anatomical classification. It can- not consequently serve to determine the degree of gravity of a tumor. No anatomical classifica- tion can at present answer this legitimate desire of the physician. To determine the degree of gravity of a tumor, knowledge of the order, species, and variety to which it belongs can alone be depended upon. The sole general considera lion, which may be advanced on the subject of the benignity or malignity of tumors, is that the most serious are those which determine, the formation of a large quantity of embryonic ele- ments, at the expense of which they grow rapidly. Our classification has the advantage of being purely histological and of being based on one law and on one consideration which seems to us to be supreme, that is, the general arrange- ment of the morbid tissue and the distribution of the elements composing it." Cornil and Ranvier, adopting the aphorism of Miiller, endeavor to conduct their classification on the anatomical basis, but even at the beginning are inconsistent, for instead of grouping the tu- mors in accordance with the histogeny of the tissues, they mix connective tissue with epithelial NEOPLASMS. 357 growths ; thus they place in group second, in- oma, myxoma, lipoma (connective tissue growths), with carcinoma (epithelial growth), and then add tubercle, glanders, and syphilitic gummata, which have no legitimate place in this group. Instead of placing in one and the same group, sarcoma, myxoma, inoma, lipoma, chondroma, and os- teoma, which are all connective tissue growths, they scatter them in four distinct groups. They make varieties of medullary and fasci- culated neuromata which are in reality species ; and epithelioma and adenoma which are genera are also set down as varieties. They class papilloma as a variety of epithelial growth, while in truth it is a papillary or villous inoma, and should be so named and not called papilloma. They include too the cysts, which should be placed under a distinct and separate caption. The mixed tumors, described by them as formed especially during intra-uterine life, belong properly to the teratisms and should be classified accordingly. This all shows how inconsistent and fallible men can be ; even those whose minds are richly stored with knowledge. Therefore nothing in medicine should be taken for granted because ut- tered by one high authority. Every assertion, 358 NEOPLASMS. theory, discovery, and new method or process, should be put to the most searching tests by many laborers, and, before they are accepted, should pass through the expurgating crucible of criticism which will clear away the dross of error and misconception, and bring forth the genuine glitter of the pure and precious truths of science. This is the right path to advancement. Hasse thinks that neoplasms probably arise in tissues in different conditions — embryonic, grow- ing, mature, retrogressive. They are regarded as new formations because they are more or less in- dependent of the matrix tissue. They behave like independent, isolated bodies, except that they draw their sustenance from the organism ; they have their autonomy, so that they bear no relative increase or decrease of size with the organism. Examples: A neoplasm, in a fat subject, does not decrease in size upon the supervention of emacia- tion ; and a neoplasm, in a lean subject, does not increase in size upon the supervention of cor- pulency. " The neoplasm assumes properties distinct from its surroundings, the individual ele- ments of the growth become affected in some w^ay and they are rendered dissimilar to their neighbors. There is no limiting or directing in- fluence of the surrounding tissues on the new growth. The result is development of a tissue of NEOPLASMS. 359 abnormal type, a local anatomical misforma- tion." Cohnheim is of opinion that neoplasms cannot be regarded as localised hyperplasias because they generally differ in their histogenesis from the matrix tissue, and because this histogenesis is so different from the formative processes orig- inating in inflammation. His views of the em- bryonic theory are substantially as follows : Many forms of neoplasms are developed at all ages, they originate too in apparently normal tissues, and are due to the persistence of embry- onic germinal tissues in the otherwise mature organism ; taking their rise in what may be called belated rudiments — foci of formative em- bryonic tissue which have not been utilised in elaborating normal tissues, and so have lingered on unchanged. In other words such a growth is an atypical new-formation starting in a latent embr)^onic rudiment. The germs of the growth may be very small and elude observation, being embryonic cells, or may be quite recognisable among the normal elements. These germs may long remain inactive, but when external condi- tions, supply of nutriment, and relation to sur- rounding tissues are favorable, they begin to multiply, start into a new life and form a neo- 3^0 NEOPLASMS plasm.* Cohnheim's arguments in favor of his theory have explained the otherwise unaccount- able heterogeny of many neoplasms. He says : many new-growths are hereditary ; they may exist at birth or develop in infanc}'^ ; they show a preference for sites where, in early develop- mental stages, complication of structure happens ; where different epithelial formations pass one into the other, as the lips, stomach, anus, and cervix uteri ; or where the entire -process of de- velopment is complex, as the genital apparatus ; also the atypical structures. In order to fully understand the blastodermic theory of the development of neoplasms, it is necessary to pass in review the changes which take place in the human blastoderm. The follow- ing, which exposes the most recent views of the subject, is abstracted from Duval's physiology. " Originally the human organism consisted of a single cell, the ovule, which when fecundated begins to undergo certain transformations, the first of which being segmentation. As soon as the ovule is divided in four segments, these limit between themselves, by their slight separation, a space called the segmentation cavity. As the * It is well known how often new-growths take their start* ing point from traumatisms. NEOPLASMS. 361 segmentation goes on, this cavity increases more and more, and finally the segmented ovule be- comes a hollow sphere whose parieties are con- stituted by a layer of cells comparable to epithelia. The large cavity circumscribed by this layer of cells still bears the name of segmentation cavity. Then take place transformations which differ somewhat in different animals, but may neverthe- less be brought to the following type : that is to say to the formation of a gastrula. One of the hemispheres of the hollow sphere becomes fiat, then is gradually invaginated in the interior of the other hemisphere. A new cavity, called the invagination or gastrula cavity, is thus produced, w^hich corresponds to the future intestinal cavity. " The segmentation cavity is then reduced to a mere chink separating two cellular layers : the one of the layers, which corresponds to the interior of the original intact hemisphere of the hollow sphere, is called the external layer, the other, which corresponds to the interior of the invagi- nated hemisphere is called the internal layer. Soon the internal layer, by multiplication of its cells, is divided into two layers, one of which be- ing the internal layer proper, and the other the middle layer or mesoblast. The mesoblast there- fore occupies a position, in what was the segmen- tation cavity, between the internal and external 362 NEOPLASMS. layers. Such is the origin and development of the blastodermic vesicle, and such are the relations of its three layers. The epiblast or external horny layer retains its cellular character, and from it is derived the epidermis. " The entoblast or internal layer furnishes the epithelium of the future intestinal mucous mem- brane and of that of its annexes, of the great majority of glands, and of the lungs. "The mesoblast or middle layer. The cells of of this layer undergo much more complicated transformations than those of the other two layers. Some of them are transformed into nerve tissue, into muscle tissue, and into all the forms of connective tissue ; others preserve their cellu- lar state, but are changed in form and diffused in the fibrous element of connective tissue, ** they are called embryonic or mesoblastic cells — cells of tendons, cartilage, bone — ; the others swim in a fluid — blood cells, etc." * Rindfleisch and Lancereaux based their classi- fications of the new-growths upon the derivative tissues of the blastoderm, and divided these new- growths into two great classes ; (i,) that in which the generative tissue is derived from the meso- ♦ Mathias Duval. Cours de Pysiologie. Sixieme edition. Paris, 1887. NEOPLASMS. 363 blast ; (2,) that in which the generative tissue is derived from the entoblast and epiblast. The first being formed of connective tissue, the second of epithelium, of epidermis, or of their derivatives. Hallopeau adopted this basis of classification in the first edition of his work, but in the second edition he says: "to-day the soundness of this division may be doubted in view of the late em- bryogenic researches of Waldeyer, showing that the entoblast and mesoblast are derived from the invagination of the epiblast; in that case the mesoblast has not the same individuality as the others, for, elements of different nature are therein united. Duval had arrived independently at the same conclusion. In his work on Physiological Chemistry (1880), Gamgee, in treating of the epithelium of the mucous membranes, says : " This epithelium is mainly derived from the hypoblast, though in some cases it takes its origin in the epiblast (epithelium of mouth and salivary glands), in others from the mesoblast (certain portions of the epithelium of the genito- urinary tract). In short, the epithelium of the mucous membranes is possessed of diverse chem- ical attributes and is developed in several ways ; it does not therefore possess any common charac- ters which permit of a general description." 364 NEOPLASMS. The clinical basis is out of the question because, if an arrangement were attempted on such a foundation, the malignant and non-malignant growths would have to appear under separate heads ; for instance, epithelioma and carcinoma would have to be placed in the same order as sarcoma, etc. It would be against all rules of nosography to arrange growths in accordance with their benignity or malignity, for this belongs to prognosis which occupies its proper rank in methodical arrangement. Rindfleisch still adheres to the blastodermic basis,* and defines a tumor as ** an excess of de- generative local development." The classification which he now promulgates is based upon the duality of the embryonic ele- ments (His.), namely, (i,) archiblastic tissues, which, besides the epithelial casing of the epiblast and entoblast, include the muscular and nervous elements that are generally credited to the meso- blast; (2,) the /<3:r Ammoniaemia . 46, 264 Amnesia lOZ Amphimerina , . 95 Amputatura 94 Anacatharsis , 105 Anaesthesia 98, 114 Anaphrodisia, , , 99,114 Anasarca 82, 104, 112 Anatomy . . . . . 31 Anchylosis 82 Anepithymiae . 99. 127 Anetus . . . 139 Aneurysma . . . . • * 92, 115, 147 Angina .... 98 Angioma . . . 49 Angioses . 16S Anhelatio . . . . . 97, 117, 125 Anorexia 99. 114 Anosmia . . , . • 98. 114 Antipathia 102, 153. Anthracia I • I4S Anthrax . . . 92, 141 Anthroponosography . 34 Anthropophysiography 31 Anxietas . . 100, 153 Aphelxia . • 14^ Aphonia . 99, 114, 136 Aphoria 157 Aphorisms of Linnaeus . 1 8a Aphtha 83. 95, no. 144 INDEX. 385 Apocenosis .... . 115. 125 Apolepsis 83 Apomyttosis 97 Apoplexia 83, 99, III, 154 Apparatus — definition of 64 Apparatus — circulatory, disturbances in . .47 Ardor . . . . 100 Aridura 104 Arthritis . . . , 100, 124 Arthrocace 94 Arthrodynia no Arthropuosis ., • .110 Arlhrosia . . » • 144 Ascarides . . 83 Ascites . . . 105. 113 Asphyxia 99 Asthenia . . . . 99 Asthma . 83,98,111,125,138 Athroisaemia . 47. 324 Atrophy . 47,52.55.104,112 Auante . . . . 83 Aurigo . . 106, 127, 164 Auxesis . . . . 47, 52, 326 Azoteneses , . 119 Bacteria . • . . . 298-323 Ballismus . 153 Barber-surgeon . 41 Basis of classification . 214 Baumes' system 118 Beriberia 97. 153 Bex . , . . . 137 Bezoardus , , , . 133 Bibliography, nosographical , , 200-211 30O INDEX. Biothalmy » . » . ; 37 Blastomata , . . , 49. 373 Blennoses . 166 Blennorrhoea . , . -. . 155 Blepharoptosis ..... 93 Blood, alterations in composition of , 45. 254 Bronchitis . ^ , . . 142 Bronchocele ,. , 92 Bubo ... . . . 83 92. 115, 140 Bucnaemia ..... . 143 Bulimia ...... 102, 114 Cachexiae . . . 83, 104, 108. 112, 117, 127 Caeliaca . 103 Calculus . . ... . 133 Caligo . , . ... 98, ii3» 150 Callus . ,. . • 163 Calorineses ...... . 119 Cancer . „, . , 83, 92, 115. 336 Carbuncle ... . . . 83 Carcinoma . . , 49, 105 Carcinus . 146 Cardialgia , . , , . , , ' loi, 132 Cardiogmus . . 100 Carditis . , . . 96, 109, 123, 142 Caries . , , . , . 94. -116, 147 Carphologia . . , , , . , 97 Carpotica . 157 Caruncula ..... , 163 Carus . . . . , 83.99 Catacausis , 146 Catalepsia . 154 Catalepsis ,. . ,. . . 99 Cataphora 83.99 INDEX. 387 Catarracta . . 98, 150 Catarrhus . . . loo, no, 124, 143 Catoche . ... . 83 Catochus . . , ... . 97 Catotica . ... . 160 Cenotica . . . .... 154 Cephalaea . . . • 100, 154 Cephalalgia . . . \ 100 Cephalitis . . . 96, 142 Chancroid ulcer 49 Chirurgery, master in 41 Chlorosis . . . 106, III, 156 Cholaemia . 46, 266 Cholera . _ , . . 84, 103, III, 133 Cholesteraemia . . . ... 266 Chololithus . , 135 Choloses . . 165 Chondroma 48 Chorea . . . . . III. 153 Cibaria 132 Cinetica 152 Clasis .... 128 Classification of medicine . • • 31 Classification . , 212 Classification, basis of 214 " , method of .237 " , need of . , • 213 Claudicatio 97 Clavus . 115,163 Clonici generates ., . .97 Clonici partiales . . • 97 Clonos .... • • 126 Clonus . . . ^ • 152 388 INDEX. Coeliaca .... 124, 130 Colica .... loi, III, 132 Coma ..... 84, 126 Comata .... 99. Ill Condyloma .... 92 Congestion .... 47. 324 Constrictoria .... 125 Contractura . , , 96, 114, 126 Contusio .... 94 Convulsio .... 97. Ill Cophosis . , , . 98 Coprostasis , , , 132 Coryza . . , . . . 84, 103, 136 Crampus .... 96 Cretinismus .... 159 Crichton's system 122 Critici . . . . , 107 Cullen's rules . . 180 Cullen's synopsis . . 109 Cynanche .... 96, 109, 123 Cyrtosis .... . 159 Cystides .... 92 Cystirrhoea .... 124 Cystis .... 128 Cysts ..... 50. 376 Cystitis .... 96, no, 123, 142 Cystocele . . . . 93 I>arwm'§ §y8tem 118 Debilitates . . . . 98,117 Decrease . . , , 48, 54 Definition of medicine 29 Definitions of terms of classification 247 Defluxion ♦ , • , . 84 INDNX. 389 Deformes • • * 108 Deformitates . 108 Degeneration . 48, 327 Deliria .... . 102 Demens . 149 Demonomania . 102 Description and definition • • • 226 Desmoneoplasmata . 48, 371 Diabetes 103, in, 125 Dialysis .... . . 128 Diarrhoea, 84, 103, in, 132 Diastasis .... . 94, 129 Dilatation . 48,57 Diplopia .... • . lOI Dipsosis . 131 Discalorineses . . n9 Disease, definition of . . 43 , etymology " . • 43 , facies " • 32 Disorder . . . . . . 58 functional • 51 Disoxygeneses • . n9 Diuresis • 125 Dolores . . . • 100, 108, n/ Dolorosi . 107 Dyalyses . . . . . . n6 Dysaesthesiae 98. 113 Dyscinesiae • • 99, n4 Dysecoea . 98, 113 Dysenteria 84, 103, no, 124, 143 Dysodia . 104 Dysopia . . . . . • . 113 Dysorexiae • n4 390 INDEX. Dyspepsia Dyspermatismus Dyspermia Dysphagia Dysphonia Dysphoria Dyspnoea Dysthetica Dystocia Dysuria ficchymoma Ecchymosis Eccritica Eccyesis Echmasis . Eclampsia Ecphlysis Ecphronia Ecphyma Ecpyesis Ecstasis Ectasis Ecthyma Ectopiae Eczema Effera Efflorescentiae Elcosis Elephantiasis Emboh'smus Emesis Empathema ■ Emphlysis . Ill, 132 . 104 , 115, 126 • • . 156 lOO, 114 125, 131 • • 137 • 153 84. 98, III, 125, 138 • 145 . lOI 84, 104, 115, 126 9h 115 • 85, 127 . 159 • , 158 48,57 • • 97 162 • . 148 163 • ^ 163 99. 154 • . 48,57 163 93. 116, 128, 129 162 • • 95 91. 125 106 105, ] ti3. 146 . 47» 326 132 • . 148 . 145 INDEX, 391 Emphyma « • -• • 159 Emphysema • • < • 92, 128, 160, 142 Emprosthotonos • • « . 85 Empyema • • • 85, 98, 109 Empyesis t • • . 145 Enanthesis 144 Encephalocele • • • 93 Endothelioma 48 Enecia • 140 Enlargement 47. 52 Entasia « • • . 152 Enterica 130 Enteritis . . 96, 109, 123, 142 Enterocele 93 Enterolithus . 133 Enteroses 165 Enuresis . 103, 115 Epanetus 139 Ephelis 91. 164 Ephemera . 94. 139 Ephialtes . 97. 138 Ephidrosis . 103, 115, 161 Epichrosis 164 Epilepsia . 75. 97. Ill Epinyctides • 85 Epinj'ctis 1 • • 91 Epiphora . • • • • 103, 115 Epiplocele . 93 Epiploitis » - • • • . 96 Epischeses • • • 57, 108, 115, 125 Epistaxis • < • - . no Epithelioma » 1 » 49 Equinia • ' • • ' . 49 392 INDEX. Erotomania 127 Erysipelas . , 85, 95, no, 144 Erythema 92, 124, 141 Eschara . . . 94 Ethmoplecoses 165 Evacuatorii . 108 Exangia 147 Exania . . . . 93. 134 Exanthemata . no, n7, 125 Exanthematica 95, 107, 144 Exanthesis 162 Exarthrema . 94 Excoriatio 94 Excrescentiae . 92 Exocyste . 93, 128 Exomphalus , . 93 Exophthalmia . , 93 Exormia . 162 Exostosis 92, n6, 124, 159 Extractives . 294 Exulceratio 94 FacuUy, definition of . 70 Farr's system . 174 Favi . 85 Feb res 94, 108, 109, 117 Fibroma 48, 371 Fissura 94 Fistula 86,94 Flatus , . . . 132 Fluxus 102, 117 Foreign bodies 50 Fractura 94, 116 Framboesia 105, n3 INDEX. 393 Function, definition of . 66 Functional disorders . 51. 59 Furor . . . . 156 Furunculus 92. 141 Oalaetia 155 Galactirrhoea . . . 104 Ganglion . . . . 115 Gangraena 86, 106,^09, 147 Gangrene, humid and dry . . ' 48 Gasterocele 93 Gastritis . , . . 96, 109, 123, 142 Gastrodynia V . .101 Gastroses . . . . 165 Generic characters 188 Generic names 191 Genetica . 154 Genetic sense 26 Gibbositas . . 92 Glanders 49 Glaucoma , • S6 Glaucosis 150 Glioma .... 48, 371 Gonorrhoea . 86, I04,jii5, 124 Good's system . 130 Gout . . . 86 Graviditas 104 Green sickness 86 Gutta rosea 91 Haeman gioma . 49. 372 Haematemesis 103 Haematica . , » 139 Haematuria . 103, 125 Haemodiapedisis . 47, 325 394 INDEX. Haemoptysis t • • - * t 102, no Haemorrhagia .47, 86, 102, no, 125. 145. 325 Haemorrhois • • - • - m -, • 86, 103, no Hallucinatio . • • • « . loi, 127 Hectica • • • • . 95, 109 Helminthia . , • • ^ . . 133 Hemicrania • • • • • 100 Hemiplegia 99 Hepatalgia • ' • * 9 • • lOI Hepatirrhoea »■- • • • 103 Hepatitis 96, 109, 123, 142 Hepatocele 93 Hernia • • • •- • 116, 128 Herpes 86 , 91, 116, 162 Hidroa • • • • • 91 Hippocrates, diseases upon which he has written 82-91 Hordeolum 92, 141 Hosack's system » » »- • i66 Hydatis 93. 1 16 Hydrarthrus . • • ((N * - 93, n6, 144 Hydrocele , ii3» 128 Hydrocephalus . 105, n2 Hydrogeneses . n9 Hydrometra . . 105, n3 Hydrophobia 102, 112 Hydrops 160 Hydrorhachitis 105, n2 Hydrothorax . 98, 113 Hygiene . 35 Hyperaemia . . 45. 254 Hyperaestheses . 108 Hyperalonaemia . 45. 259 Hypercholesteraemia » .. . . 46, 266 INDEX. 395 Hyperchromataemia Hypererythrocythaemia Hyperglycaemia Hyperinosaemia Hyperhydraemia Hyperleucocythaemia Hyperleucontaemia Hyperlipaemia Hyperphysaemia Hypersarcosis Hypertrophy and Hypotrophy Hyperuraemia Hyperuricaemia Hypoaemia Hypoalonaemia Hypocholesteraemia Hypochondriasis Hypochromataemia Hypoerythrocythaemia Hypoglycaemia Hypohydraemia Hypoinosaemia Hypoleucocythaemia Hypoleucontaemia Hypolipaemia . Hypophysaemia Hypostophyle . Hypouraemia Hysteralgia Hysteria . , Hysteritis Hysterocele Hysteroloxia • 45. 259 46, 261 . 46, 263 45. 257 . 45. 257 46, 260 . 45. 258 46, 262 . 46, 262 . S6 53. 55. 326 46, 265 . 46, 265 45. 255 . 45. 259 46, 266 lOI, III 46, 260 . 46, 261 46, 264 . 45.257 45, 258 . 46, 261 45. 259 . 46, 262 46, 262 93 46, 265 lOI 97, 112 10 124, 143 • 93 93 390 INDEX. Hysteroptosis 93 Icterus . . • • 113' 134 Icthyiasis 162 Ileus . 103, 132 Impetigines 105, 113 Impetigo . 127, 163 Impotens S7, 156 Infiltration . . • • 48. 328 Inflammation 47, 51, 52, 123 Inoma . • 48, 371 International Medical Congress, questions s uggested for discussion by 244 Intumescentiae . 104, 112, 128 lonthus 141 Ischaemia 47, 323 Ischias lOI Ischuria . 105, 115, 125 Lagnesis . 156 Laryngismus 137 Laryngitis 142 Lassitudo 100 Laxarthrus 94 Leiomyoma 49» 372 Leipopsychiae 99 Leipothymia 99 Leontiasis 105 Lenticula 164 Lepidosis 162 Lepra . 49,105,113 Lepriasis 162 Leprosy . 87 Lethargus , . 99» 154 Lethargy . 87 INDEX. 397 Leucaemia Leucasmus Leucoma Leucomnines Leucophlegmatia Leucorrhoea Leucorrhois . Leucoses Lichen Lienteria . Limosis Lipoma Lissa . , Lithia Lordosis Loxia Lues Lumbago . Lupia . Luxatio Lymphangioma Lymphexosmosis . Lymphorrhagia ]%Iacbride'§ system Macies Maculae Madness Malasicterus Malis Mania Marasmus Marcores Marisca 260 164 91 286-296 87 104, 124, 155 124 . 165 162 87» 103. 133 131 48, 334 152 . 161 92 . 152 146 . loi . 93» 115 87, 116, 128 • 49. 372 47, 325 . 47, 325 . 117 104 91, 127 87 . 106 105, 163 102, 112, 148 145 112 93, 134 398 INDEX. Mastodynia • ■ • • lOI Means • • • . • 135 Medicine, definition of 29 , classification of • 31 and surgery 39 Meiosis . 48, 54. 327 Melaena . ' . 103. 134 Melanaemia 46, 267 Melancholia , , . * S7, 102, 112, 148 Melasma . 127 Membranaceae • t 96 Menorrhagia , , 103, no Mentales . , 107 Mesotica . 159 Metamorphoses, retrograde 48 Meteorismus ^ J 105 Metritis . » • 96 Miliaria , 95, no, 144 Milium • • ' 162 Monsters 50 Moria . • • 149 Morbositas 127 Morositates ° • ■ 102 Motorii 108 Mutitas • '' • . 99. 114 Myoma • < 49. 372 Myxoma . 48 ]Vau§ea 103 Necrosis • ' • ■ . ' 48, 106, 147, 327 Neoplasmata . 48 49» 328-372 Nephralgia • ' « lOI Nephritis , . k no, 123, 142 Neuralgia • • 151 INDEX Neuroglioma Neuroma Neuroses Neurotica Nictitatio Nomenclature, character of Nosography, origin of Nostalgia Nyctalops Nymphomania . , Nystagmus Obstipitas Obstipatio Obstruction , . Odontalgia . Odontia Oedema , . Oneirodynia Ophthalmia Opisthotonos Oppressivae Orchitis Organ, definition of Orgastica . , Orthopnea Oscedo Oscheocele . , Osteoma . . Osthexia . . , - Ostocopus ^ , o . Otalgia . , Otitis Otorrhoea , , 399 48, 371 49. 372 III 148 152 227 . 74 102, 114 . 88 . I02, 114, 127 97 . 96 115. 125 . 49, 57 lOO, no, 124 130 • 92 . 112 oo, 109, 123, 143 , 88 . 98 • 143 . 63 • 156 88,98 • 97 . 93 • 48 160 • 100 100 • 142 104 400 INDEX. Oxygenases Pa I pita! io Pandiculatio Panophobia Parabysma Paracusis Paracyesis Parageusis . Paraglossa Paralysis Paramenia Paramorphiae Paraneurismi Paranoiac Paraphonia Paraphrenitis Paraph legia Paraphrosyne Parapsis Parasites Pareccrises Parenchymatosae Parhaemasiae Paristhmitis Parodynia Paroniria Paronychia Paropsis Parorchydium Parosmis Parostia Parotis Parotitis . 119 97, III, 152 97, 152 102 135 98, 113, 150 157 151 93 99, III, 154 154 129 129 108, 127 99, 114 96 99 102 . 151 50 129 96 129 142 . 158 149 92, 141 149 93 150 • 159 92 142 INDE X. 401 Parr's rules . 185 Parr's system 122 Paruria 161 Pathengenetic and pathogenetic 56, 326 Pathology 34 Pemphigus 95. no, 144 Periostea 124 Peripneumonia 88,96 Peritonitis 109, 142 Pernio 142 Pertussis in Pestis • • 95. no, 145 Petechia 127 Phaenigmus 106, 127 Phallic worship 26 Phimosis 92 Phlegmasia . 47. 52 Phlegmasiae 87, 95. 109, 117. 123 Phlegmatia 104, 128 Phlegmon 123 Phlegmone 92, 140 Phlogistici . 107 Phlogosis 109, 124 Phlogotica 140 Phlyctaenae . 88 Ph lysis . . . . 141 Phonica 136 Phosphoreneses n9 Phrenica 148 Phrenitica 124 Phrenitis . 88 , 96, 109, 123 Phthinasis • 106 Phthisis 104, no, 124, 146 402 INDEX. Phyma 92, 141 Physconia . 104, 113 Physician, the ideal 42 Physocepiialus ^ 105 Physometra 105, 112 Pica . 102, 114, 132 Pinel's system . 118 Pityriasis 162 Plagae . 94, 117, 128 Plague . . 88 Plethora . 145. 254 Pleuralgia 138 Pleurisy . 88 Pleuritis 96, 142 Pleurodyne . 9» Plica . 163 Pneumatica 136 Pneumatosis . • . 104, 112 Pneumonia 109, 123 Pneumonica . 124, 137 Pneumonitis 142 Pneumoses 165 Podagra . no, 144 Poecilia 164 Polypus . 88, 125, 136 Polydipsia . 102, 114 Polysarcia 104, 112, 159 Pompholyx 162 Porphyra . . 147 Porrigo 163 Priapismus . 96, 126, 152 Proctalgia lOI Proctica . • 134 INDEX. 405 Proeotica 156 Profluvia . . * • 108, 125 Profusio .... "5 Prolapsus ', , . . 116, 128 Prophylaxy .... 35 Proptoma . . . . 93 Prurigo . . . • 162 Pruritus . , . . . 100 Psellismus . -. . . 99. 114, 137 Pseudoblepsis • 113 Pseudocycsis 158 Psora . . . . 116 Psoriasis .... 162 Psydracia ... . 91 Pterygium 88, 92 Ptomaines 267-286 Ptyalismus . . . • 103. 115. 131 Pudendagra . lOI Puerperalis . , . • 124 Punctura . . 94 Purpura , . , 95 Pyosapraemia 46, 297 Pyretica 139 Pyrexiae . . , . 109, 123 Pyrosis . . , 100, III Pyuria . 104 Qiiietale§ . 108 Quinsey . . . . . 89 Rai^e-Delorme's system i66 Raphania .... III, 153 Recamier's system . -■ , , 121 Rhabdomyoma 49» 372 Rhachia . . , 159 404 INDEX. Rhachialgia . . Rhachitis .... Rhagas .... Rheum .... Rheuma .... Rheumatismus Rhinoscleroma Rhonchus . . , , Rhypia .... Richerand's system . . . Rigor .... Rosalia .... Roseola .... Royal Coll. of Phys. of London Rubeola .... Rubigo .... Rubula .... Rules for the guidance of the nosographe: Ruptura .... Sagar'8 §y§tein Salacitas . . , , Oaid-X • • • a • Sanguifluxus Sarcoma .... Satyriasis .... Sauvages, notice of . Savignac's system Scabies .... Scarlatina .... Scelotyrbe .... Sciatica, .... Scirrhus .... Scorbutus .... 48, loi, 132 105, 113 . 94 89 . 98 100, no 49. 374 136 . 162 129 . 97 144 162 175 95. no, 144 127 145 180 94 116 156 149 102 92, 115. 159. 365 102, 114. 127 76 173 105, 163 95, no 97 89 . 92, us 105, 113. 127 INDEX. 40s Scrophula 105, 113 Scurvy . . 89 Scybalum 133 Selle's system • 117 Septicaemia . , 46, 267 Serifluxus . . 103 Singultus 98, 152 Sinus 94 Somnambulismus lOI Spasmi '96, 108, III, 117, 126 Spasmodicae 97 Specific differences 194 Spermorrhoea . . 155 Sphacelus 89, 109, 147 Spilus . 164 Splanchnica 134 Splenalgia lOI Splenitis 96, no, 142 Splenocele 93 Staphyloma 93. 150 Stark's system 173 Stenosis 48, 56 Sternalgia . 138 Sternutatio 97, 152 Stertor 89,98. 136 Stomacace 103 Stones . , 50, 89 Strabismus yu, 114, 126, 150 Strangury . 89 Stricture • • • 48, 56 Strophulus 162 Struma • • 146 Stupor . , , 100 406 INDEX. Suffusio lOI Supercalorineses .119 Superoxygeneses 119 Suppressiones .117 Suppressorii . . . . 108, 125 Surditas .... . . . 150 Swediaur's system . . . 129 Sycosis .... . 141 Synclonus 153 Syncope .... 99. Ill Synocha 94. 109, 123 Synochus 94, 109, 123, 140 Synonyms . . . . 198 Synopsis of Cullen .109 Synopsis, of morbid states, etc. . ; 45 Syphilis . . 49, 105, 113, 127, 146 Syphilodes . . , , 146 Syrogmos • • . lOI Systatica . . . , 153 Systremma . , . 152 Tabes • . . , 104, 112, 146 Tabes dorsales ... 90 Tarantismus , . . . 102 Tenesmus 90, 103, 134 Teratology . . . . 34 Terminthi . • 90 Tetanus . . . , 90,97, III, 126, 152 Tetartophya . .95 Therapy . . . , . . 36 Thrombosis . • 47.325 Tinea . . . 105, 116 Tonici generales . . 97 Tonici partiales . , . 96 ] [NDEX. 407 Tourdes' system , .120 Tourtelle's system . ....... 121 Tricoma .106 Trichosis . • . 90. 163 Tremor . , . 97. III. 153 Trismus 96, III, 126, 152 Tritacophya . • . 95 Trophopathies • 165 Tuber . 128 Tubera • • 105 Tuberculosis . 49 Tuffls 98 Tumors . . • . 90 Tympanites . 105, 112 Typhomania 99 Typhus, 95. 109. 123, 140 Ulceration 48 Ulcers . ... 90 Ulcus . 94,116,147 Ureses • 165 Urticaria . no, 144 Taccinia . . . 144 Vagi , . . . . 100 Varicella no, 144 Varieties . . 198 Variola 95. no. H5 Varix • . 90,92, us, 147 Verruca 92.115.163 Vertigo 91. loi Vesaniae , . loi, n2, 117, 127 Vitet's system .117 Vitia . 91] 108. 117 Vitiligo 91 408 INDEX. Vomica • • • • • 109, 140 Vomitus ••••••• 103 Vulnus • • • • • . 94, 116 Angell's Pnnting Office, 354 Fourth Ave., N. Y. 409 WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR. A CASE OF POLYPUS OF THE LARYNX. — Tracheotomy to prevent impending suffocation ; laryngo-tracheotomy ; recurrence of the disease ; operation repeated ; recovery. New York Medical Journal, September 1867. On external perineal urethrotomy, or an improved method of external division of the urethra in perinaeo for the relief of obstinate stricture, etc. Transactions of the Medical Society of the State of Nev^ York, 1869. New York Medical Journal, August 1S69. Reprinted in pamphlet form, pp 32. Instruments for exploration of the urethra, — Difficult catheterism, etc. Medical Record, March 15th, 1870. Treatment of intractable (urethral) strictures. Divulsion and divulsors, etc. Medical Record. April ist, 1870. On internal urethrotomy. Medical Record. April I5lh, 1870, Strictures at the meatus urinarius, and in the fossa navicularis. Their nature, diagnosis and treatment. Medical Record. May 2d, 1870. On MODERN lithotripsy. Medical Record. October ist, 1870. 4tO Urethral fever from catheterism, its nature and treat- ment. Medical Record. October ist, 1872. Case of retention of urine caused by a single, diseased kidney, situated in the pelvic cavity, for tiie relief of which rectal puncture was done. The trocar passing to the right of the bladder and entering the kidney. Death on the fourth day after the operation. Autopsy. Re- marks. Medical Record. October I5ih, 1872. Rupture of the bladder from retention of urine due to .stricture of the urethra. With cases and remarks. Medical Record. November ist, 1872. Diseases of the urinary organs, including stricture of the urethra, affections of the prostate and stone in the bladder. 1873. 8vo pp 368. Perityphlitic ABSCESS due to perforation of the appendix vermiformis, with remarks on the surgical treatment thereof. Transactions of Medical Society of the State of New York, 1875. Virginia Medical Monthly. March 1875. Pamphlet pp 9. Treatment of chronic cystitis. Abstract of a paper read on this subject to the Medical Society of King's County, New York. Medical Record. October 30th, 1875. Urethroplastic operations to remedy hypospadias, epispadias and incurvation of the penis. Medical Record. February 19th, 1876. Pamphlet pp 15. 411 Stone in the bladder, its spontaneous expulsion and its removal by lithotripsy, lithotomy and perineal lithotrity, with an analysis of thirty-five cases. Abstract of paper read to Medical Society of the State of New York, June 1876. Medical Record. July 8th, 1876. Report of a case of sub-periosteal excision and dis- articulation of the entire inferior maxillary bone for phosphorous necrosis. Pamphlet pp 6. Extracted from the Transactions of the International Medical Congress, Philadelphia. September 1876. Amputation of the penis. Cases illustrative of the man- agement of the extremity of the urethra after amputation of the penis close to the pubes. Louisville Medical News. September 15th, 1877. Retention of urine in elderly men. Acute retention of urine. Medical Record. August 23rd, 1879. Internal urethrotomy and lithotripsy at the same sit- ting, etc. With remarks on rapid lithotripsy, and on the evacuation of detritus from the bladder. Pamphlet pp 16. Reprinted from the Medical Record. October i8th, 1879. Note on CYSTORRHagia from retention of urine. Pamphlet, pp 15. Reprinted from the Transactions of the Medical Society of the State of New York for 1880. and published in ihc Medical Record. February 21st, 1880, Chronic retention of urine in elderly men. Pro- ceedings of the Medical Society of the County of Kings. Vol, VI, January 1882. A CLINICAL contribution to lithoclastic cystotomy, with eleven illustrative cases. The Medical Gazette. Nev^r York, June 2d, 1883. Report of a case of ligature of the right prim- itive ILIAC artery for diffuse aneurism of the external iliac; death from pyaemia on the twenty-first day. Transactions of the New York State Medical Association. 1884. Some points in the surgery of the hypertrophied prostate. Transactions of the American Surgical Association. 1885. Notes on contracture of the bladder consequent upon cystitis. Transactions of the New York State Medical Association. 1885. Sacculation and perforation of the bladder as consequences of chronic retention of urine. Pamphlet pp 14. Reprinted from the Transactions of the New York State Medical Association. 1 886. COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES 0043056059 ^^■-^'- ^- DATE DUE JAN 6^T?^ ^ . nw Demco, Inc. 38-293