RECAP 14 SIMPLIFIED GOODWIN BROWN IWWW IWTWIHIIWII H I I I H u. ^ Columbia ®ntbergttp tn tfte Cttp of JJeto gorfc ^ S ^cfjool of Cental anb (J^ral ^>urgerp Reference Htbrarp vS SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED A CONDENSED STATEMENT AND EXPLANATION FOR EVERYBODY OF THE DISCOVERIES OF CHITTENDEN, FLETCHER, AND OTHERS BY GOODWIN BROWN, A.M. FOURTH EDITION NEW YORK FREDERICK A. STOKES COMPANY PUBLISHERS Copyright, 1908, By FREDERICK A. STOKES COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED April, 1908 PREFACE rpHE object of this book is to present in A concise form and in language free from technicalities a popular summary of the information necessary for the practical application of the new principles of nutri- tion advanced by Mr. Horace Fletcher, Prof. Russell H. Chittenden, Prof. Irving Fisher and other investigators. Although the subject has been most ably presented from the point of view of its fore- most layman, from the point of view of one of the highest scientific authorities in Amer- ica, and from the point of view of a famous political economist, it has not yet been treated by a private person who has tested the merits of the system in his own life and found it good. It is this task that has been attempted here. In his fifty-fourth year, the origina- tor of this book felt that he was ageing rap- iii PREFACE idly, going painfully down the wrong side of the hill of life and giving up one by one all the pleasures that had made living at- tractive to him. He had lost his power to work, his enjoyment of social pleasures and all his interest in intellectual pursuits. He suffered from intense pain which he took to be muscular rheumatism, and, at times, from a mild form of aphasia. His one object was to get done with his necessary work as rapidly as possible and go to bed. Some- times he was so overcome with weakness, dizziness and fatigue in the middle of the day that he was forced to go to his club and lie down for an hour or so before he could go on with his work. To-day he is in better health than he has enjoyed since he was a boy and feels that — barring accidents — he should live to be a hundred. For this he has to thank the new system of diet described in the following pages. The best part of the new plan is that it costs nothing to adopt it. It requires no expensive apparatus, no consultation of spe- iv PREFACE cialists, no change of climate, no release from daily work ; it is a mere matter of get- ting and applying certain easily understood information. However, as a busy professional man, he realizes how difficult it is for a man engaged in the exacting and complicated occupations of modern life to search out this informa- tion through the various books in which it is to be found and to devise a method for ap- plying it. Therefore he has secured a digest of the points which he has found most valu- able in working out his own problem with the idea of presenting a sort of lawyer's brief of the subject. His hope is that the work will attract the attention, not only of men and women, who in the prime of life are suffering — as he was himself at one time — from all the symptoms of old age, but of the young men and women whose constitutions are subjected to the strain of commercial life; of the boys and girls in the schools and colleges whose bodily forces are taxed to the utmost by the exac- tions of modern education; and of the par- PREFACE ents and educators who have the guidance of the lives of the coming generation. It is his sincere conviction that the application of the principles recommended will yield an immense increase of energy for daily work and will add many useful years to their lives. VI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As the author's object has been to present not his own ideas, but discoveries that bear the stamp of authority, he has introduced no new theories. He lays no claim to original research, but has gone direct to the fountain-heads and has expounded in this book doctrines expressed fully in the works that have been of most help and guidance to him personally. His thanks are especially due to Mr. Horace Fletcher for the ideas and information contained in " The A. B.— Z. of Our Own Nutrition " and " The New Glutton or Epicure/' published by Frederick A. Stokes Company, New York; and to Professor Russell H. Chittenden for the use that has been made of his " Physiological Economy in Nutrition " and " The Nutrition of Man," issued by the same publishers. Acknowledgment is also gratefully made to Professor Irving Fisher, of Yale, for the use of valuable mate- rial contained in his pamphlets, magazine articles and lectures ; to Dr. Hubert Higgins, author of " Humani- culture " ; to Dr. C. W. Saleeby, the author of " Worry, The Disease of the Age," and to Professor Lafayette B. Mendel, of Yale, author of " Childhood and Growth." (These books are all published by Frederick A. Stokes Company.) vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Those interested in pursuing further any particular topic will find specific reference to the authorities quoted in this book. To those who desire a more com- prehensive knowledge of the subjects treated in this book and a more thorough acquaintance with the new conception of diet are recommended the works of Professor Chittenden, Mr. Fletcher and Dr. Sager. The three books that will probably be found most helpful to the ordinary reader are: The A. B. — Z. of Our Own Nutrition, by Horace Fletcher. The Nutrition of Man, by Professor Russell H. Chittenden. The Art of Living in Good Health, by Dr. D. S. Sager. As a busy professional man the author has found it necessary to secure the services of an experienced writer in the preparation of the manuscript. For such services he acknowledges his indebtedness to Frances Maule Bjorkman, whose enthusiasm for the subject and ability in writing have contributed to make the book what it is. G. Be vm CONTENTS PAGB Introductory .. 1 Chapter I 18 Topics: Mr. Fletcher's discovery and his quest for scientific endorsement. The test of his claims at Cambridge. Opinions of Sir Michael Foster and Dr. Hubert Higgins. Observation of the system at Yale. Dr. Anderson's report. Professor Chitten- den's experiments on professional men, soldiers, athletes and dogs. Professor Fisher's experiments upon students and upon meat-eaters and vegetar- ians. Summary of the evidence. Chapter II 56 Topics: Composition of foods. Purposes served by the various food elements. Digestion. Changes occurring in the mouth. New discoveries in regard to saliva. The effect of mastication upon the di- gestive process. Taste and appetite as stimuli of the digestive secretions. Other psychic influences in digestion. Assimilation. Poisonous properties of the body-waste. Metabolism. Quantities of food necessary to the maintenance of physical efficiency. The old dietary standards. The new standards. Chapter III 94 Topics: The principles of Mr. Fletcher's theories. Appetite, true and false. Taste, the guardian of the digestive tract. Nature's Food Filter. The Art ix CONTENTS of Mastication. Inutility of Gladstone's rule. In- hibitive effect of excess of attention. Influence of the mental and emotional state. Objections to the system considered. Results. Testimony of the rejuvenated. Chapter IV 139 Topics: True food requirements. Reduction of pro- teid. The question of meat-eating. Vegetable proteid. Amount of fuel-foods necessary. Speci- men dietaries. Tables indicating proteid and fuel value of common foods. The question of stimulants and condiments. Physiological value of sugar. In- utility of foods as specifics. General principles. Conclusion. Index 195 List of Authorities 199 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED INTRODUCTORY TITHEREVER one may look over the' * * civilized world to-day, he will find in progress a systematic movement for the im- provement of the race. In every country the greatest scientists are giving their best efforts to the study of the human organism, while sociologists, economists, reformers and philanthropists are laboring by means of popular health movements to build up a peo- ple with strong and vigorous bodies. One of the typical expressions of this great race movement is the establishment in America of the Committee of One Hundred — a body of leading scientists, social workers and finan- ciers appointed by the American Associa- tion for the Advancement of Science, to work for the creation of a national depart- ment of public health. These numerous and varied activities have one point in common — a vigorous insistence l INTRODUCTORY upon the importance of more intelligent ways of feeding. In the face of the per- haps not wholly unwarranted prejudice against any attempt at a scientific regula- tion of diet, laboratory investigators and social workers are urging the members of the human race to learn to feed themselves with at least as much wisdom as they have used for years in the feeding of their domestic animals — the physicians and physiologists declaring that practically all functional disorders have their rise in faulty nutrition, and the sociologists, political eco- nomists and social workers asserting just as emphatically that much of the poverty, vice and crime of the world is directly traceable to errors in diet. " We eat or drink for health or ill health," says Dr. Daniel S. Sager. " Explain it as you will, this is the only way in which dis- ease can occur in the human body. . . . Aside from surgery and midwifery, the practice of medicine for the most part re- volves about the stomach. . . • While medical science has thousands of names for 2 INTRODUCTORY diseases, at bottom all diseases are alike. Poisonous principles are thrown into the blood and the result is disease. There are several hundred organs and tissues in the body, each one of which, when affected, gives a name to a disease; but while the names of diseases are different, yet the cause which produces them is generally the same — overeating, which produces auto-intoxica- tion, self -poisoning, malassimilation, prema- ture old age or disease, — call it what you will. The conditions which produce Bright's disease will also produce gout, rheumatism, cancer, or appendicitis." 1 This is the view of the modern physician. Professor Irving Fisher of Yale, speaking as a political economist, says: " Much attention is now being paid to the physiological condition of the laboring classes, their housing, the sanitation of fac- tories, hours of labor, child labor, etc. Equally important is the problem of the nu- trition of these classes. Industrial inef- iSager: "The Art of Living in Good Health," pp. 8, 168, 179. $ INTRODUCTORY ficiency is the price of malnutrition. In- creased labor power will be the practical out- come of diet reform." 2 Out of this agitation there has at last emerged a complete new conception of di- etetics, the chief recommendation of which is that it gives all the best results of a scientific- ally regulated dietary in combination with all the advantages of a reliance upon in- stinctive promptings of taste and appetite. The new conception has been fittingly named "economic nutrition" because its fundamental purpose is to save the body from unnecessary labor through a reduction of food to exact physiological needs. This, the originators of the new concep- tion point out, is an unqualified advantage to anyone, as every ounce of food over and above the amount necessary to furnish building materials during growth, to repair tissue that has been broken down by muscu- lar exercise, and to supply fuel to keep the body warm and energy to keep it running, places upon every organ the thankless task 2 Irving Fisher, Ph. D.: The Independent, August, 1907, 4 INTRODUCTORY of working over this excess of food for the sole and exclusive purpose of getting it out of the way. The new theory attacks the deep-rooted idea in the mind of man that everything he can get down will do him good and that he will surely receive a return for it, if not in increased energy for work, then in a reserve which he can call upon some day when he needs it. On the contrary, it declares that food in excess of physiological requirements does not yield increased energy for work, but actually takes energy that might be given to work; furthermore, that food can- not be stored by the body in any considerable quantity, and that the residue which is left floating about in the blood is the chief source of disease to the human organism. This principle applies with particular force to the class of foods which forms the great staple of the diet of most of the civil- ized peoples of the world: the tissue-build- ing or " proteid " foods, consumed chiefly in the form of meat, fish, eggs, and in a lesser degree in peas, beans, lentils, nuts and 5 INTRODUCTORY cheese. The reason for this is that these foods — unlike the fuel-producing foods found in grains, fruits, vegetables, butter and oil — cannot be completely burned up by the body, but leave behind them a solid " ash," which, as Dr. Edward Curtis has ex- pressed it, " must be raked down by the liver and thrown out by the kidneys." 3 If you think of the body in the light of an engine, the theory at once becomes clear. After you have your engine built you do not feed it on brass and iron and copper: you feed it on coal. It is true that you have to put iron and steel and copper into it now and then when repairs become necessary, but in nothing like the quantities of coal that you have to use to keep it running. It is obvious that if you dumped iron and steel and copper into the furnace in amounts equal to or exceeding the coal, it would soon wear out or break down. This is exactly what the originators of the new theories of dietetics say happens to the s Edward Curtis, M. D.: "Nature and Health," p. 70, Henry Holt & Company, New York. 6 INTRODUCTORY human body when it is fed upon building material in excess of fuel. To the common practice of eating more meat than vegeta- bles they attribute most of our ills. Further- more, they declare that it is our excessive eating of " high-proteid " foods like meats that cuts us off in our prime at seventy or eighty or so, when, according to the biologi- cal law that the lifetime of an animal should be from five to seven times the growing period, he should live to be a hundred at the very least. It must therefore be evident that the new discovery is of immense importance to prac- tical men and women with work to do in the world. Everybody would like to be up to his or her best all the time. Most of us ex- perience only brief spurts of our maximum efficiency. If it be true that one of the lead- ing causes, if not the leading cause, of the sense of inefficiency that hangs over us like a pall, is due to the fact that we are consum- ing an excess of food — then the new diet plan supplies us with at least one effective means of tapping those "new levels" of INTRODUCTORY energy that Professor James speaks of in his famous essay, ' The Powers of Men." 4 For the benefit of those who may be in- clined to reject the new plan — for all its ad- vantages — on the grounds that it will inter- fere with the pleasures of the table, it may be stated that the universal testimony of those who have adopted it is that they never realized what true enjoyment of food was before they tried it. On this point Profes- sor Chittenden says : " Simplicity of diet does not diminish but rather increases the pleasure of eating, especially when daily restriction in diet — in- dulged in until a new habit is formed — has created a greater keenness of appetite, since under such conditions the palate takes on a new sensitiveness, and manifests a fuller ap- preciation of the variations of even a simple dietary. There is therefore no hardship, nor curtailment of the pleasure of eating in the restriction of the diet to the real needs of the body. Neither is there implied any 4 Professor William James: "The Powers of Men," American Magazine, November, 190T. 8 INTRODUCTORY cessation of that kindly hospitality that de- lights in the ' breaking of bread ' with one's friends. With enlightened methods of liv- ing, on the other hand, will come a truer ap- preciation of the dignity of the body, and a lessened desire to manifest one's feelings of hospitality by a lavish intemperance that is as unphysiological as it is wasteful." 5 To those who are timid about adopting it because their " doctors told them it was dan- gerous to cut down the food that makes muscle," it may be pointed out that no one — doctor or not — who has not made an ex- haustive study of the subject with the same thoroughness or the same facilities as its originators is qualified to give an authorita- tive opinion regarding it. The theory is an advance over old ways of thinking and can- not, therefore, be tested by any but the most advanced ideas. Everyone will concede that there is a limit to the quantity of food that can be consumed with advantage. For example, everyone will concede that ten pounds a day is too much — or nine pounds, or eight pounds, and 5 " Physiological Economy in Nutrition," p. 472, 9 INTRODUCTORY so on down ; but in the descending scale there comes a point where a doubt as to the suf- ficiency of the amount will be justified. That this point, below which it is dangerous to reduce the consumption of food, can be determined by science, will hardly be dis- puted. Every investigation of the subject has endeavored to fix it. In the generally accepted " diet standards," the minimum quantities of food commonly consumed by man have been accepted as the minimum quantities required. " Within certain rather wide limits," says Professor Chittenden, " there is an appar- ent tendency for people of different na- tions, having a free choice of food and not restricted by expense, to consume daily ap- proximately the same amounts of nutri- ments; to use what may be called liberal rather than small amounts of food; and lastly, to consume food somewhat in pro- portion to the amount of work done. It is perhaps, therefore, not strange that stu- dents of nutrition should have taken these results, obtained by the statistical method, 10 INTRODUCTORY as indicating the actual needs of the body for food, and that so-called 'standard diets ' and ' normal diets ' should have been constructed, based upon these and cor- responding data. . . . These standards covering the quantities of food per day ' are intended to show the actual food require- ments of persons under different conditions of life and work.' Here, however, lies an assumption which seems to meet with wide acceptance, but for which it is difficult to conceive any logical reason. The thousands of dietary studies made on peoples all over the world, affording more or less accurate information regarding the average amounts of proteid, fat, and carbohydrate consumed under varying conditions, are indeed most interesting and important, as affording in- formation regarding dietetic customs and habits ; but the writer fails to see any reason why such data need be assumed to throw any light on the actual food requirements of the body. In the words of another, 'Food should be ingested in just the proper amount to repair the waste of the body ; to furnish it 11 INTRODUCTORY with the energy it needs for work and warmth ; to maintain it in vigor ; and, in the case of immature animals, to provide the proper excess for normal growth, in order to be of the most advantage to the body.' (Benedict.) Any habitual excess of food, over and above what is really needed to meet the actual wants of the body, is not only un- economical, but may be distinctly disadvan- tageous. . . . With these thoughts in mind, may we not reasonably ask why it should be assumed that there is any tangi- ble connection between the dietetic habits of a people and their true physiological needs? Arguments predicated on custom, habit, and usage have no physiological basis that ap- peals strongly to the impartial observer. Man is a creature of habits; he is quick to acquire new ones when his environment affords the opportunity, and he is prone to cling to old ones when they minister to his sense of taste. The argument that because the people of a country, constituting a given class, eat a certain amount of proteid food daily, the quantity so consumed must be an 12 INTRODUCTORY indication of the amount needed to meet the requirements of the body, is as faulty as the argument that because people of a given community are in the habit of consuming a certain amount of wine each day at dinner their bodies must necessarily be in need of the stimulant, and that consequently alcohol is a true physiological requirement." 6 Accordingly, Professor Chittenden, actu- ated by his belief that what a man eats is no guide to what he should eat, has shown by a series of elaborate experiments, extending over long periods of time, that persons of widely varying habits of life temperament, and constitution, can maintain, and even heighten their mental and physical vigor, on far smaller quantities of food than these " minimum requirements " of the diet stand- ards. Since the point to be determined is the quantities of food men can live on, not what they do live on, it appears safe to as- sume that Professor Chittenden has come nearer than anyone else to determining the minimum food requirements of man. « Chittenden: " Nutrition of Man," pp. 157-159. 13 INTRODUCTORY Secondly, everyone must concede that it is possible for science to ascertain the mini- mum requirement of man for proteid food, and also to ascertain whether the quantities of proteid in excess of this amount are of ad- vantage or of disadvantage to the body. So far no one has been able to refute Professor Chittenden's conclusion, drawn from his elaborate experiments, that the quantities of proteid consumed by the average man are far in excess of the quantities assimilated, and that the excess of proteid not assimi- lated is of unqualified disadvantage to the body. > Thirdly, everyone will concede that it is possible for science to determine whether or not the complete mastication advocated by Horace Fletcher is of any specific value to the nutritive processes. So far all the scientists who have investigated the matter have been convinced that it is. The remarks of Elie Metchnikoff in his book, " The Pro- longation of Life," which have been taken by some persons as a scientific refutation of the claims of Mr. Fletcher's theory, are of 14 INTRODUCTORY an extremely casual nature, and are Based, not upon extensive investigations such as will be described in this book, but upon the statements of a single physician, who, in a small pamphlet, has published an account of his observations upon two persons suffering from an intestinal disease which he attrib- uted to the fact that they gave an unusual amount of care to the mastication of their food. The remarks in question are as fol- lows: " The habit of eating quickly favors the multiplication of microbes around about the lumps of food which have been swallowed without sufficient mastication. It is quite harmful, however, to chew the food too long, and to swallow it only after it has been kept in the mouth for a considerable time. Too complete a use of the food material causes want of tone in the intestinal wall, from which as much harm may come as from im- perfect mastication. In America, where Fletcher's theory took its origin, there has already been described, under the name of 'Bradyfagy,' a disease arising from the 15 INTRODUCTORY habit of eating too slowly. Einhorn, a well- known specialist in the diseases of the diges- tive system, has found that several cases of this disease were rapidly cured when the pa- tients made up their minds to eat more quickly again. Comparative physiology supplies us with arguments against too prolonged mastication. Ruminants, which carry out to the fullest extent Mr. Fletch- er's plan, are notable for extreme intestinal putrefaction and for the short duration of their lives. On the other hand, birds and rep- tiles, which have a very poor mechanism for breaking up food, enjoy much longer lives." 7 Mr. Fletcher himself has pointed out that there is danger in carrying the practice of mastication to extremes. Once the swallow- ing impulse has asserted itself, he says, there is no advantage in and there may be direct injury from attempting to hold the food in the mouth, even if it has not been reduced quite to the point of complete liquefaction and tastelessness. 7 Metchnikoff : " The Prolongation of Life." G. P. Put- nam's Sons, New York. 16 INTRODUCTORY MetchnikofF's statement that the rumi- nants are notable for intestinal putrefaction and shortness of life is at least open to ques- tion. The experiments of Dr. C. A. Herter with animals of all classes indicate that, while the bacteria in the intestines of the fast-eating animals (such as cats, dogs, lions, tigers and wolves) are of a deadly character, the bacteria in the intestines of the slow eaters (such as buffaloes, goats, horses and elephants) are practically harmless. 8 And while it may be true that the lives of birds and reptiles are longer than those of rumi- nating animals, it has yet to be proved that the lives of fast-eating animals are longer than those of the ruminants. The practical experience of everyone who has adopted the new plan supplies ample evidence that it is productive of only the best possible results. We have now to see that the reason it produces these good results is because it rests on a firm basis of scientific truth. s C. A. Herter, M. D.: " Character of the Bacterial Flora of Carnivorous and Herbivorous Animals," Science, p. 859, December 28, 1906. 17 CHAPTER I Topics: Mr. Fletcher's discovery and his quest for scientific endorsement. The test of his claims at Cambridge. Opinions of Sir Michael Foster and Dr. Hubert Higgins. Observation of the system at Yale. Dr. Anderson's report. Professor Chitten- den's experiments on professional men, soldiers, athletes and dogs. Professor Fisher's experiments upon students and upon meat-eaters and vegeta- rians. Summary of the evidence. I" IKE many another discovery of the ■*-^ highest value to science, the principles of the new conception of dietetics set forth in this book were hit upon by accident and applied in everyday life before they were worked out in theory; and, like many an- other great discovery, they had to bear the brunt of popular ridicule before they were stamped with the seal of scientific recogni- tion. Only a few years ago the mention of the word " Fletcherism " was enough to provoke a laugh. A mere American business man, without any scientific authority whatever, 18 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED was declaring from the housetops that he had stumbled upon a great truth in regard to human nutrition that the authorities on dietetics had overlooked. His contention was based on the fact that by chewing both his solid and liquid food until, literally, there was nothing left of it, he had cured himself of a complication of diseases and made him- self eligible for life insurance, although only a short time before he had been rejected as an unsafe risk. He asserted that the practice of thorough mastication had revealed to him that one-half the quantities of food consumed by the aver- age man was more than enough to meet all true bodily needs ; and that when the faculty of taste was given a chance to pass on every- thing taken into the mouth, the appetite was not only satisfied with much smaller quanti- ties, but that it indicated a preference for vegetable rather than animal food and tended to reject alcoholic liquors, tea, coffee, and most condiments. Although a member of some of the most famous clubs in the country and a social f a- 19 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED vorite in San Francisco, New Orleans, Chi- cago, New York, and generally throughout America, Mr. Fletcher suddenly found him- self an object of ridicule. He and his chew- ing-cult were made the subjects for endless humorous newspaper paragraphs. He was cartooned and lampooned from one end of the country to the other. Some of his friends, shocked and offended at seeing a man they knew rapidly becoming a national joke, actually cut his acquaintance. Nothing daunted, however, Mr. Fletcher went serenely on his way, talking his discov- ery whenever and wherever he could get any- one to listen, and finally hurling defiance in the faces of his critics by writing a pamphlet on the subject, which is now incorporated in his book, " The New Glutton or Epicure." 1 His method of eating as set forth in this vol- ume may be briefly summarized as fol- lows: Eat only when there is a vigorous appe- tite, expressed, not in a gnawing of the stom- ach — never pay any attention to that — but i Fletcher: " The New Glutton or Epicure." 20 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED in a watering of the mouth. If there is no appetite, wait — even if you have to omit a few meals. Never eat when you are hurried. If you haven't time to give full attention to the taste of a meal, don't eat until you can get time. Never eat when you are worried, angry, exhausted or unhappy. It is better to go without food for a week than to eat when the negative emotions have you in their grip. Masticate all food, liquid as well as solid, until it is sucked down into the throat by an involuntary swallowing impulse, giving at- tention, not to the mechanical movements of chewing, but to the sensations of taste pro- voked thereby. Remove from the mouth the tasteless resi- due. It can be done without observation, and it is better to risk criticism than to make a waste basket of the stomach. The result of this practice of eating, Mr. Fletcher declared, was a utilization of food so complete as practically to do away with 21 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED the decomposing waste products of the body and to leave nothing to the organs of excre- tion but an inoffensive deposit of cellulose and other dry, unabsorbable material. The first recognition of his theory which Mr. Fletcher received from the scientific world came from a brief review of this book in the London Lancet , in which the au- thor, Dr. Joseph Blumfield, intimated that Mr. Fletcher had apparently stumbled upon some physiological truths that had been over- looked by the experts and that might be well worth their while to look into. This gave Mr. Fletcher a new idea. It was to get the endorsement of science for his discovery — and he started out seeking for authorities forthwith. Dr. Ernest Van Someren, an English physician, was the first member of the medi- cal profession whom he succeeded in per- suading to test his claims for the practice of what he called " physiologic mastication." Dr. Van Someren, who had long been a suf- ferer from a case of gout which had refused to yield to the treatment of a London spe- 22 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED cialist, adopted Mr. Fletcher's plan of pro- longing the mouth treatment of food, both liquid and solid, until its taste had been ex- tracted and it was sucked down into the throat by the " involuntary swallowing im- pulse," and, in the course of a few weeks, his symptoms began to disappear. His conversion was complete. He ini- tiated a series of experiments upon his own account and set forth the results in a paper which he presented first to the British Med- ical Society, and later, more elaborately, before the International Congress of Physi- ologists at Turin, Italy, in 1901. 2 The paper created a sensation among the physiologists, and brought Mr. Fletcher and Dr. Van Someren an invitation from Sir Michael Foster to visit Cambridge Univer- sity in England and submit their theory to scientific tests at the hands of Dr. F. Gow- land Hopkins and the other physiological experts in the Cambridge laboratories. These experiments brought the subject 2 For this paper see, " The A. B.— Z. of Our Own Nutri- tion," pp. 27-46. 23 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED definitely and permanently before the scien- tific world. Dr. Hubert Higgins, demon- strator of anatomy at the University, after trying the system recommended by Mr. Fletcher and Dr. Van Someren upon him- self, and thereby reducing his weight from two hundred and eighty-two to one hundred and ninety-six pounds, became so enthusias- tic that he wrote a book on the subject to prove, on grounds of pure science, that the practice of " physiologic mastication " would contribute largely to the complete regenera- tion of the human race. 3 Sir Michael Foster, permanent honorary president of the Inter- national Congress of Physiologists, pub- lished a " Note " in which he declared that the observations upon Mr. Fletcher and Dr. Van Someren established beyond all question that a full and careful study of their conten- tion was urgently called for. " In the two individuals who pushed the method to its limits," wrote Sir Michael Fos- ter, " it was found that complete bodily efficiency was maintained for some weeks 3 Dr. Hubert Higgins: " Humaniculture." 24 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED upon a dietary which had a total energy value of one-half that usually taken, and comprised little more than one-third of the proteid consumed by the average man. . . . The scientific and social importance of the question is clearly immense, and it is greatly to be desired that its study should be encouraged." 4 The reports of the Cambridge experi- ments aroused the interest of Dr. Henry P. Bowditch of Boston, and, through him, of Prof. Russell H. Chittenden, President of the American Physiological Society, Direc- tor of the Sheffield Scientific School at Yale, and one of the leading physiological chem- ists of the world. Professor Chittenden invited Mr. Fletcher to come to Yale and submit himself to further observation in order that the scientists of America might investigate the claims of the new theory. The story of how Mr. Fletcher went to Yale, and, on a diet of breakfast food, milk 4 For full text see " The A. B.— Z. of Our Own Nutri- tion," pp. 48-52 ; or " The New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 18-24. 25 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED and maple sugar, beat the records of some of the best athletes in the University, has already been made familiar to the people of this country by the newspapers. However, in order that the tale may bear the weight of scientific authority, it may be well to give here the official report of the endurance tests written by Dr. W. G. Anderson, director of the Yale gymnasium. " I gave to Mr. Horace Fletcher the same kind of exercises we give to the varsity crew," wrote Dr. Anderson. " They are drastic and fatiguing and cannot be done by beginners without soreness and pain result- ing. The exercises he was asked to take were of a character to tax the heart and lungs, as well as to try the muscles of the limbs and trunk. I should not give these exercises to freshmen on account of their severity. " Mr. Fletcher has taken these movements with an ease that is unlooked for. He gives evidence of no soreness or lameness, and the large groups of muscles respond the second day without evidence of distress after or 26 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED during the endurance test, that is, the long run. The heart is fast but regular. It comes back to its normal beat quicker than does the hearts of other men of his weight and age. " The case is unusual, and I am surprised that Mr. Fletcher can do the work of trained athletes and not give marked evidences of overexertion. My conclusion, given in con- densed form, is this: Mr. Fletcher per- forms this work with greater ease and with fewer noticeable bad results than any man of his age and condition I have ever worked with." 5 In making these tests the investigators took care to assure themselves that Mr. Fletcher's records were not accounted for by the fact that he had been an athlete in his youth, or on the grounds that he was a soma- tic freak of abnormal muscle development. Other men who had been practicing his sys- tem of eating were subjected to the same tests and it was found that they surpassed Mr. Fletcher in just so far as they had a e " The New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 32-33. 27 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED natural advantage over him in youth or phys- ical training. The tests convinced Professor Chittenden that the amounts of food ordinarily con- sumed — particularly of the food known as " proteid," which is eaten chiefly in the form of meat — were far in excess of the real needs of the body. Therefore he initiated a series of experiments upon men of widely differ- ing dietary habits, activities, temperaments, and physical condition, extending over a long period of time, with the purpose of de- termining what was the minimum of food — particularly proteid food — upon which the average person can maintain himself in phys- ical and mental vigor. The subjects of the first experiment were Professor Chittenden himself; Dr. Lafay- ette B. Mendel and Dr. Frank P. Underhill, two other physiological chemists in the Shef- field Scientific School; Dr. Arthur L. Dean, instructor in plant physiology in the same institution, and Mr. George M. Beers, a clerk in the treasurer's office. While the work of these men was chiefly 28 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED mental, they could hardly be classified strictly as sedentary, because — with the ex- ception of Mr. Beers — they all had to be on their feet and moving about in their laboratories for the greater part of every day. As Professor Chittenden's purpose was not to test the merits of Mr. Fletcher's claims for the benefits of mastication, but to ascertain the exact physiological require- ments of man for food in general and pro- teid food in particular without introducing any conditions, he did not require his sub- jects to masticate their food with any un- usual degree of care. The only change he made in their accustomed dietaries was pre- scriptively to reduce the amount of meat and other proteid food about one-half. During the six months that the subjects were under observation their weight remained sta- tionary, they improved in general health and experienced a quite remarkable increase of mental clearness and energy. Furthermore, the laboratory tests revealed the fact that the composition and general character of the 29 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED blood remained unimpaired and that the sys- tems were in " nitrogenous equilibrium " — which means that the men were not paying out more than they were taking in, a condi- tion of prime importance to the maintenance of health. To meet the objection that the new diet theory, while meeting fully the requirements of persons of dainty dietary habits and high intellectual development, might fail to sat- isfy men of a more material mould, Profes- sor Chittenden used for his next experiment a detachment of twenty soldiers, volunteers from the hospital corps of the United States Army, only thirteen of whom, however, really took part as subjects. For six months these men were quartered in a build- ing near the Sheffield Scientific School at New Haven under command of Dr. Wallace De Witt, First Lieutenant and Assistant Surgeon of the United States Army, and subject to constant surveillance of the com- manding officer and the non-commissioned officers. " They represented," says Professor Chit- 30 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED tenden, " a great variety of types : of differ- ent ages, nationalities, temperaments, and degrees of intelligence. They were men ac- customed to living an active life under vary- ing conditions, and they naturally had great liking for the pleasures of eating. Further, it should be remembered that, although the men had volunteered for the experiment, they had no personal interest whatever in the principles involved, and it could not be ex- pected that they would willingly incommode themselves, or suffer any great amount of personal inconvenience. Again, there were necessary restrictions placed upon their movements, when relieved from duty, which constituted something of a hardship in the minds of many of the men and added to the irksomeness and monotony of their daily life. Regularity of life was insisted upon, and this was a condition which brought to some of the men a new experience. These facts are mentioned because their recital will help to make clear that, from the standpoint of the men, there were certain depressing influences connected with the experiment which would 31 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED add to any personal discomfort caused by restriction of diet. ' The ordinary army ration to which these men were accustomed was rich in proteid, especially in meat, and during the first few days they were allowed to follow their usual dietary habits, in order that data might be obtained bearing on their average food con- sumption. The details of one day's food in- take will suffice to show the average charac- ter and amount of the food eaten per man : Breakfast — Beefsteak 222 grams (7£ oz.), gravy 68 grams (2£ oz.), fried potatoes 234 grams (7§ oz.), onion 34 grams (1 oz.), bread 144 grams (4§ oz.), coffee 679 grams (22f oz.), sugar 18 grams (f oz.) Dinner — Beef 171 grams (5f oz.), boiled potatoes 350 grams (11§ oz.), onions 55 grams (2 oz.), bread 234 grams (7| oz.), coffee 916 grams (30J oz.), sugar 27 grams (1 oz.) Supper — Corned beef 195 grams (6$ oz.), potatoes 170 grams, (5§ oz.), bread 158 grams (7§ oz.), fruit jelly 107 grams (3$ oz.), coffee 450 grams (15 oz.), sugar 21 grams (§ oz.) " It is not necessary to comment upon the large proportion of proteid matter in the day's ration ; the three large portions of meat 32 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED testify clearly enough to that fact, while the three equally large volumes of coffee indi- cate a natural disposition toward generous consumption of anything available. Habit, reinforced by inclination, has evidently placed these men on a high plane of food consumption. " For a period of six months, a daily diet- ary was prescribed for the subjects ; the food for each meal and for every man being of known composition, each article being care- fully weighed, while the content of nitrogen in the day's ration was so graded as to bring about a gradual reduction in the amount of proteid ingested. The rate of proteid katabolism [breaking down, opposed to anabolism, or building up] was likewise de- termined each day by careful estimation of the excreted nitrogen, balance experiments being made from time to time in order to ascertain if the men were in a condition of nitrogen equilibrium. Finally, it should be mentioned that the subjects lived a fairly active life, having each day a certain amount of prescribed exercise in the university gym- 33 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED nasium, in addition to the regular drill and other duties associated with their usual work. "As just stated, the amount of proteid food was gradually reduced, three weeks being taken to bring the amount down to a level somewhat commensurate with the esti- mated needs of the body. This naturally re- sulted in diminishing largely the intake of meat, though by no means excluding it. Effort was constantly made to introduce as much variety as was possible with simple foods, though the main problem with this group of men was to keep the volume of the food up to such a point as would dispel any notion that they were not having enough to eat. A second problem, which at first threat- ened trouble, was the fear of the men, as they saw the proportion of meat gradually drop off, that they were destined to lose their strength; but, fortunately, they very soon began to realize that their fears in this direc- tion were groundless, and a little later their personal experience opened their eyes to pos- sible advantages which quickly drove away all further thought of danger, and made 34 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED them quite content to continue the experi- ment." 6 The following is a sample of the daily meals given to the men after the first month when the amount of their proteid food had been reduced : APRIL 1 Breakfast — Fried hominy 150 grams (5 oz.), syrup 75 grams (2£ oz.), butter 20 grams (f oz.), one cup coffee 350 grams (llf oz.) Dinner — Baked spaghetti 200 grams (6§ oz.), mashed po- tato 250 grams (8£ oz.), boiled turnip 150 grams (5 oz.), bread 10 grams (J oz.), apple sauce 200 grams (6§ oz.), one cup coffee 350 grams (llf oz.) Supper — Fried bacon (f oz.), fried sweet potato 200 grams (6§ oz.), bread 35 grams (1£ oz.), butter 20 grams (f oz.), jam 100 grams (3£ oz.), apple-tapioca pudding 300 grams (10 oz.), one cup tea 350 grams (llf oz.) Total nitrogen content of the day's food 7,342 grams. From this sample meal it will he seen that during the last five months of the experiment the men were living on about one-third of the proteid food to which they were accustomed. " If," says Professor Chittenden, " the relatively small amount of proteid food e Chittenden: " Nutrition of Man," pp. 193-197. 85 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED made use of in this trial was inadequate for the real necessities of the body, some indica- tion of it would be expected to reveal itself, with at least some of the men, by the end of the period. One criticism frequently made is that the subject draws in some measure upon his store of body material. Should this be the case, it is evident that the body- weight — in a such a long experiment as this — will gradually but surely diminish. Fur- ther, the subject will show a minus nitrogen balance, i. e., there will be a constant tend- ency for the body to give off more nitrogen than it takes in. As bearing on the first point, the following table showing the body- weights of the men at the commencement of the experiment in October, and at the close of the experiment in April, will be of in- terest : Table of Body- Weights. October, 1903 April, 1904 kilos pounds kilos pounds Steltz 52.3 115.27 53.0 116.81 Zooman 54.0 119.01 55.0 121.22 Coffman 59.1 130.25 58.0 127.83 Morris 59.2 130.47 59.0 130.03 Broyles 59.4 130.91 61.0 134.44 36 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED October, 1903 April, 1904. kilos pounds kilos pounds Loewenthal ...60.1 132.46 59.0 130.03 Sliney 61.3 135.10 60.6 133.56 Cohn 65.0 143.26 62.6 137.97 Oakman 66.7 147.00 62.1 136.86 Henderson ....71.3 157.14 71.0 156.48 Fritz 76.0 167.50 72.6 160.01 Bates 72.7 160.23 64.3 141.71(Feb.) Davis 59.3 130.69 57.2 127.06(Jan.) " As is readily seen, five of the men prac- tically retained their weight or made a slight gain. Of the others, Coffman, Loewenthal, Sliney, and Cohn lost somewhat, but the amount was very small. Further, the loss occurred during the first few weeks of the experiment, after which their weight re- mained practically stationary. Fritz and Oakman lost weight somewhat more noticea- bly, but this loss likewise occurred during the earlier part of the trial. . . . Of all the men, Bates was the only one who underwent any great loss of weight. He, however, was quite stout, and the work in the gymnasium, reinforced by the change in diet, brought about what was for him a very desirable loss of body-weight. It is evident, therefore, that there was no marked or prolonged loss 37 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED of body-weight as a result of the continued use of the low proteid diet." 7 Professor Chittenden says that regarding the second point, viz., the nitrogen equili- brium, two different balance experiments with each of the men, one about the first of March and the other a month later, indicated plainly that the men were receiving more proteid food than was necessary to maintain their bodies in nitrogen equilibrium. " The experiment results presented," says Professor Chittenden, " afford very convinc- ing proof that, so far as body-weight and nitrogen equilibrium are concerned, the needs of the body are fully met by a consumption of proteid food far below the fixed dietary standards, and still further below the amounts called for by the recorded habits of mankind. General health is equally well maintained, and with suggestions of im- provement that are frequently so marked as to challenge attention. Most conspicuous, however, though something that was entirely unlooked for, was the effect observed on the 7 Chittenden: "Nutrition of Man," pp. 198-200. 38 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED muscular strength of the various subjects. When the experiments were planned it was deemed important to arrange for careful quantitative tests of the more conspicuous muscles of the body, with a view to measur- ing any loss of strength that might occur from the proposed reduction in proteid food. The thought that prompted this action was a result of the latent feeling that somehow muscular strength must be dependent more or less upon the proteid constituents of the muscles, and that consequently the cutting down of proteid food would inevitably be felt in some degree. The most that could be hoped for was that muscle tone and mus- cular strength might be maintained unim- paired. Hence, we were at first quite as- tonished at what was actually observed. "With the soldier detail, fifteen distinct strength tests were made with each man dur- ing the six months' period, by means of ap- propriate dynamometer tests applied to the muscles of the back, legs, chest, upper arms and forearms reinforced by quarter-mile run, vault, and ladder tests, etc. The so-called 39 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED ' total strength ' of the man was computed by multiplying the weight of the body by the number of times the subject was able to push up (strength of triceps muscles) and pull up (strength of biceps muscles) his body while upon the parallel bars, to this product being added the strength (dynamometer tests) of hands, legs, back, and chest. It should be added that all of these tests were made quite independently in the university gymnasium by the medical assistants and others in charge of the work there. It will suffice for our purpose to give here the strength tests of the various members of the soldier detail at the beginning and close of the experiment : Total Strength October April Broyles 2560 5530 Coifman 2835 6269 Cohn 2210 4002 Fritz .-; 2504 5178 Henderson 2970 4598 Loewenthal 2463 5277 Morris 2543 4869 Oakman 3445 5055 Sliney 3245 5307 Steltz 2838 4581 Zooman 3070 5457 40 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED "Without exception we note with all of the men a phenomenal gain in strength, which demands explanation. Was it all due to the change in diet? Probably not, for these men at the beginning of the experi- ment were untrained, and it is not to be as- sumed that months of practical work in the gymnasium would not result in a certain amount of physical development, with cor- responding gain in muscular skill and power. Putting this question aside for the moment, however, it is surely proper to emphasize this fact, viz., that although the men for a period of five months were restricted to a daily diet containing only one-third to one-half the amount of proteid food they had been accus- tomed to, there was no loss of physical strength; no indication of any physical de- terioration that could be detected. In other words, the men were certainly not being weakened by the lowered intake of proteid food." 8 In order to ascertain how much of the im- provement in the muscular strength, skill s Chittenden: " Nutrition of Man," pp. 202-204. 41 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED and endurance of the soldiers was due to the change in diet alone, as well as to demon- strate the fallaciousness of the old belief that a man doing heavy muscular work requires a large quantity of proteid food, Professor Chittenden secured as subjects for his next experiment a group of eight of the leading athletes of the University, all in " training form" and engaged constantly in violent muscular exercise. For five months they lived on a diet comprising not more than one- half to one-third the quantity of proteid food they had been in the habit of eating: as in the case of the soldiers, nitrogenous equili- brium was maintained, the weight, when once adjusted to the new level, remained practi- cally constant and the gymnasium tests to which they were frequently subjected showed, in every man, a truly remarkable gain in strength and endurance. " Naturally," says Professor Chittenden, " in the case of these men the gain in strength recorded cannot be assigned to systematic training. The only change in their mode of living which can in any sense be considered 42 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED as responsible for the improvement is the change in diet. The main fact to be emphasized, how- ever, is that these men — trained athletes, accustomed to living on relatively large amounts of proteid food — for a period of five months reduced their intake of pro- teid food more than fifty per cent, without loss of bodily strength, but, on the contrary, with a marked improvement in muscular power." 9 Convincing as these experiments may seem to the average lay mind they did not meet the old argument, drawn from certain experiments upon dogs, that high-proteid animals cannot live and thrive for any great length of time on the low proteid diet, and that, therefore, while man, as a moder- ate proteid-eater, can endure for a while even large reductions in proteid food he will eventually manifest some of the disas- trous results obtained experimentally with dogs. 9 Chittenden: " Physiological Economy in Nutrition," p. 438. SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED Therefore Professor Chittenden's next step was to demonstrate that these old ex- periments proved nothing at all except that any animal will not thrive if kept in close confinement under unhygienic conditions and fed on a monotonous diet. Accord- ingly the twenty dogs used in his experiment were kept under scrupulously hygienic con- ditions and fed on a diet sufficiently varied to be tempting to the appetite, although containing only about one-half to one-third the amount of proteid food to which the dogs had been accustomed. Professor Chittenden's account of his ob- servations on one of his subjects is as follows : " The animal employed in this experiment weighed on July 27, 1905, 17.2 kilograms (87.9 pounds) ; it was apparently full grown, but was thin and had the appearance of being underfed. At first, it was given daily 172 grams (5§ oz.) of meat, 124 grams (4 should be taken into the stomach. " If we swallow only the food which ex- 103 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED cites the appetite and is pleasing to the sense of taste, and swallow it only after the taste has been extracted from it, removing from the mouth the tasteless residue, complete and easy digestion will be assured and per- fect health maintained. 3 " Taste," he adds, " is the faithful servant of appetite; the sentinel of the stomach, of the intestines, of the tissues and of the brain, whose guidance and warning, if heeded, will give heretofore unknown enjoyment of eat- ing, and at the same time perfect health and a maximum of strength. 4 " How many men," asks Mr. Fletcher, " can honestly say that they taste their food? As a matter of fact, they taste the sauce and bolt their meat; they taste the butter and swallow their bread whole; they taste the sugar and their pie goes down at a gulp ; as for liquids, it may be safety said that the average man never achieves so much as a speaking acquaintance with his drinks — his coffee, his tea, his high-balls, his cocktails, 3 Fletcher: "New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 109-110. * Fletcher: " New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 152. 104 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED his wine and his beer. If he did — and this is no theory, but a well-authenticated fact — he would have no such thing as a tea or coffee habit, and he not only never would be, but never could be a drunkard. In order to give the monitor of the mouth a chance to do its work, the solid foods must be divided into small particles by the teeth, and botK solids and liquids must pass slowly and in small quantities over the taste-buds on the tongue and both must be thoroughly satur- ated with saliva. This means mastication — ■ not the ' thorough chewing ' of parental com- mand and medical advice — but mastication to a point of such completeness that the food is literally tasted out of existence and taken into the stomach by an involuntary swallow- ing impulse." 5 According to Mr. Fletcher's theories, if a man follows this practice — not with rigid conscientiousness, but with zest and enjoy- ment — he need never go to a doctor to find out what is "good for him" to eat. Any- s Frances Maule Bjorkman: The Scrap Book, New York, November, 1907. 105 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED thing that tastes good is good. If he pays attention to the physical sensations in his mouth and retains every morsel of food as long as it continues to minister to these sen- sations, he can never eat anything that is bad for him, never overeat and, if he treats liquids in the same way, he can never over- drink. In fact, Mr. Fletcher contends that in time he will develop in his throat a contriv- ance that will throw back into his mouth any- thing he attempts to swallow that has not first been made perfectly acceptable to the body by thorough mastication. Mr. Fletcher has given to this contrivance the picturesque and suggestive name of " Nature's Food Filter." Dr. Van Someren describes its workings as follows: " Food, as it is masticated, slowly passes to the back of the mouth, and collects in the glosso-epiglottidean folds, where it remains in contact with the mucous membrane con- taining the sensory end-organs of taste. If it be properly reduced by the saliva it is allowed to pass the faucet — a truly involun- 106 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED tary act of deglutition occurring. Let the food, however, be too rapidly passed back to these folds, i. e., before complete reduc- tion takes place, and the reflex muscular movement above referred to occurs . . . The late contents of the glosso-epiglottidean folds are returned to the front of the mouth for further reduction by the saliva prepara- tory to deglutition." 6 " The Food Filter, when rightly perform- ing its protective function, is impervious to anything except pure water at the right tem- perature for admission to the stomach and to nutriment which has been properly dis- solved and chemically converted by saliva- tion (mixture with saliva) into a substance suitable for further digestion." 7 The tasteless residue that is rejected by the Food Filter is invariably composed of matter that is unprofitable if not actually in- jurious to the body, and should therefore, be rejected. To the objection that it is im- possible to remove this residue from the 6 Fletcher: "A. B— Z. of Our Own Nutrition," pp. 32-33. 7 Fletcher: " New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 110-111. 107 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED mouth without violating the canons of good form, Mr. Fletcher replies : "Do you not remove cherry pits, grape skins, the shell of lobster, bone, etc., when you encounter them? Then why not remove the fibrous matter found in tough, lean meat, the woody fibre of vegetables, or anything rejected by instinctive desire to discard it after taste has been exhausted, and which is a protection provided by beneficent Na- ture? ... If fibre is found in the food, it can be put upon the fork in the same man- ner that a cherry pit is usually handled and transferred to the plate without obser- vation. " There is nothing more pronounced than . . . the impulsive desire to spit out of the mouth anything that seems unprofitable to the senses. " Muscles have been provided for this pur- pose that are more facile than those of an elephant's proboscis . . .If you acquire the habit of practicing only involuntary swallowing in eating you will find that these muscles are very discriminating, and will in- 108 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED stinctively assist in the rejection of unprofit- able matter. " Their sense of touch will soon discrimin- ate against unprofitable food even when the sense of taste is fooled by some alluring sauce or condiment." 8 "When food is filtered into the body after having become liquefied and made al- kaline, or at least neutral, by saliva," con- tinues Mr. Fletcher, " the appetite is given a chance to measure the need of the body and to discriminate against excess. As soon as the point of complete saturation of any one deficiency is reached, the appetite is cut off, as short as possible to imagine, with no indication of stomach fullness. " The appetite satisfied by the infiltering process is a sweetly appeased appetite, calm, rested, contented, normal. There is no danger from the flooding of intemperance, for there is not even toleration of excess either of more food, or more drink, and this contented appetite will remain in the condi- tion of contentment until another need has a Fletcher: " New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 117-123. 109 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED really been earned by evaporation or destruc- tive katabolism." 9 " The normal sensitiveness of taste can be recovered," he declares, " if already lost, in the course of a week, or two weeks at most, by means of the stimulating and regenerat- ing influence of natural body repair, if the method of taste and appetite cultivation re- commended in this book is followed." 10 As Professor Irving Fisher has said, " It is fortunate for the ordinary man that the taste instinct can be so easily revived, for it would be out of his power to prescribe for himself each day the exact quantity of food necessary for that day's work — the proper proportions of proteid, fat, starch and sugar, and the amounts needed of the fifteen odd mineral salts, to say nothing of acids and enzymes, for each of which only one definite amount is ideally correct. " The loss of the delicate food instinct in the ordinary man has been aggravated not only by the habit of food bolting, but the » Fletcher: "A". B— Z. of Our Own Nutrition," p. 95. 10 Fletcher: "New Glutton or Epicure," p. 153. 110 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED habit of eating what is set before us by others, instead of choosing our food for our- selves. In the experiment at Yale none of the men were served anything until they had looked over the menu and made their own choice. While this procedure is not always practicable at home or in boarding houses, it is nevertheless within the power of the ordinary individual to use his power of choice more than he does at present. If he will do so, he will usually be rewarded in a few months by reaching a condition of physical and mental efficiency of which he had scarcely dared to dream. The instinct to eat was given us for the purpose of enabling us to adapt our daily food to our varying daily needs. The realization that we have let this valuable instinct atrophy by disuse is the needed incentive to restore it to activity." " In adopting the practice of Mr. Fletcher's system, however, it is well not to be too con- scientious in regard to the mere mechanical act of chewing. " Excess of attention," says 11 Professor Irving Fisher: The Independent, New York, August, 190T. Ill SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED Dr. C. W. Saleeby, "interferes as mark- edly as carelessness with the performance of many subconscious or semi-automatic acts." 12 There is no doubt that too much thought directed upon the act of eating has a tend- ency to inhibit the digestive secretions. It is a perfectly healthy instinct that prompts the average man to think as little about his food as possible, and to demand only that it taste good. " He who counts his chews or makes hard work of mastication, by attending only to the mechanical act of chewing," says Prof. Irving Fisher, " will receive more harm than good from the practice. The food should be chewed and relished with no thought of swal- lowing. There should be no more effort to prevent than to force swallowing. It will be found that if we attend only to the agreeable task of extracting the flavors from our food, Nature will take care of the swallowing, which will become, like breathing, involun- 12 Dr. C. W. Saleeby: "Worry, the Disease of the Age," p. 34. 112 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED tary. It will also be found that taste will grow more discriminating and can be de- pended upon to guide us, both in respect to the kind of food, and also to the amount." 13 " Above all things don't strain to be care- ful. Strain inhibits — paralyzes — all of the glandular functions and deranges the nerv- ous nicety of adjustment. Just eat slowly, deliberately, small morsels, and sip and taste small quantities of liquids and observe what happens. 14 " Numbers of mastications . . . are no guide to be relied upon. " Gladstone's dictum. ' Chew each morsel of food at least thirty-two times,' was of little value except as a general suggestion. Some morsels of food will not resist thirty- two mastications, while others will defy seven hundred." 15 Therefore, needless to say, there should be no attempt to " count the chews." Even Gladstone did not carry out in his own case is Professor Irving Fisher: The Independent, New York, August, 1907. 14 Fletcher: "New Glutton or Epicure," p. 126. is Fletcher; " New Glutton or Epicure," p. 127. 113 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED his advice to his children to chew each mouth- ful thirty-two times. Dr. Hubert Higgins says 16 that an interested observer in the strangers' gallery at a public dinner in Cam- bridge took pains to count the jaw move- ments of the great statesman to each mouth- ful of food, and found that the number was usually as many as sixty or seventy. Even if counting the chews did not have this tend- ency to check the flow of the digestive juices, the practice could be of no value as a guide to the amount of chewing required because each food demands a mouth-treatment all its own. Furthermore, because of the differ- ence in the supply and the alkalinity of the saliva in individuals, no two persons can be sure of disposing of a morsel in the same number of mastications. " One person," says Mr. Fletcher, " may dispose of a morsel of bread in thirty mastications so that the last vestige of it has disappeared by involun- tary process into the stomach. Another per- son, of similar general health appearance, selecting as nearly as possible an equal mor- i« Dr. Hubert Higgins: " Humaniculture," p. 101. 114 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED sel of bread, may require fifty acts of masti- cation before the morsel has disappeared. . . . The dissimilarity lies in the difference of the copiousness and strength of the secre- tions at the time of trial." 17 It should be noted in this connection, how- ever, that, just as the strength of the arm is increased by exercise, so the vigorous use of the mechanism of mastication increases its efficiency. The secretion of saliva is not only increased, but is rendered more alkaline. Despite the popular idea, Mr. Fletcher him- self is a fast eater. Having made a vigorous and persistent use of his masticatory appara- tus for ten years, he is now able to keep pace with the average eater and yet fulfill all the conditions of complete mastication. The actual time that he spent over his two daily meals during the Yale tests was from twelve to fifteen minutes each. From this it will readily be seen that there are no grounds for the common belief that it is necessary for a follower of Mr. Fletcher to spend an un- usual length of time over his meals. it Fletcher: " New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 125-126. 115 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED And right here it should be emphasized that all that has been said in regard to the importance of mastication and insalivation applies to fluid as well as to solid food. As Mr. Fletcher points out, liquid food is a form of sustenance invented by civilization that Mother Nature did not count with when she planned the human body. The only fluid food provided by Nature is milk, the natural method of procuring which is by sucking, a process exactly analogous to chewing. The wisdom of this arrangement can well be un-* derstood when it is remembered that milk, when taken into the stomach, is transformed into a thick curd, and must undergo diges- tion as a solid. Naturally, the stomach can handle a number of these small curds much more easily than it can one large one. In order that soups and beverages may be submitted to the digestive action of saliva, it is necessary that they should be given care- ful mouth treatment before being swallowed into the stomach. " Food (drunk without mixing it with saliva) is a sort of nutritive self-abuse," says Mr. Fletcher, " and the 116 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED only way to avoid the ill effect is to give it the same chance to encounter saliva that the constituent ingredients would have had in a more solid state. . . . Anything that has taste, even soup, wine, spirits or whatsoever is tried, will resist numerous mastications be- fore being absorbed by Nature's Food Filter. Above all things, milk, wines, etc., should be sipped and tasted to the limit of compulsory swallowing." 18 Mr. Fletcher declares (and the testimony of all the people who have tested his theory uphold him) , that when tea, coffee, and alco- holic liquors are thoroughly insalivated be- fore being swallowed, the appetite will re- fuse to receive them except in extremely small quantities, if it does not refuse to re- ceive them at all. "When the body will tolerate spirits tasted into it — not poured into it — at all," says Mr. Fletcher, " which is not often when the nutrition is normal (only in damp or cold weather, as a general thing and then, in the case of the writer, only at rare inter- 18 Fletcher: "New Glutton or Epicure," p. 112. 117 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED vals, say two or three times a year), the spirit will mix quickly with the saliva and become neutralized sufficiently to excite the swallowing impulse. Continue sipping the spirit for a time and you will note that there comes a point where the saliva and the spirit do not mix, do not neutralize; the mouth becomes unduly full of liquid wdthout any relaxation or invitation of the swallowing impulse, and the really instinc- tive inclination will be to spit it out. It is a clear indication that the body toleration has been fully taxed ; there is no longer any bodily need for alcohol — in fact, there is no longer natural toleration — and the secretion sent down into the mouth is evidently mu- cous for a washing-out process, and is not alkaline saliva for assisting in a utilization function. " It will be difficult to convince the advo- cate of total abstinence that any whiskey can be taken in a seemingly harmless form, but it is true that thorough insalivation of beer, wine or spirits, until disappearance by in- voluntary swallowing, robs them of their 118 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED power to intoxicate, partly because appetite will tolerate but little. " As a matter of fact, whiskey taken in this analytical way is a sure means of break- ing up desire for it, and is an excellent pro- tection in drinking as well as in eating. Many of our test subjects have been steady and some heavy drinkers, but persistent at- tention to Buccal-Thoroughness has cured all of them of any desire for alcohol, and in time surely leads to complete intolerance of it." 19 There has been a good deal of contro- versy among those who follow Mr. Fletcher's practice as to whether conversation at meals is likely to interfere with the process of mastication. Mr. Fletcher himself declares that it does not. He is a generous enter- tainer and is extremely fond of having his friends with him at table. " It is true," says Mr. Fletcher, "that one cannot converse freely with large morsels of food in the mouth. It is also true that it is is Fletcher: " A. B.— Z. of Our Own Nutrition," pp. 93- 94; " New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 128-129. 119 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED nothing less than a gluttonous custom to greedily take a big mouthful of food, and, if accosted with a question, to bolt it in order to answer. " It will be found easy to carry on conver- sation without disagreeable interruptions and yet follow Nature's demands in prop- erly masticating food by taking small mor- sels into the mouth. It will be found also to add to the real pleasure of eating, and eventually will become a habit by choice." 20 On the other side, Dr. Daniel S. Sager says : " Despite the commonly accepted idea, conversation is apt to interfere seriously with the proper mastication of food and to dimin- ish the pleasure of eating, which should be all-absorbing for the time. The Hindu sages of antiquity considered eating a kind of sacrament to be engaged in abstemiously and silently. The Pythagorean sect ate in profound silence. Shakers never speak at the table, except in receiving or in passing food. At all events, whether the meal is eaten with merry conversation or with Qua- 20 Fletcher: "New Glutton or Epicure," p. 119. 120 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED ker-like silence, the essential thing is com- plete mastication of the food. Throughout, one should be intent upon the pleasure of eating and the gratification of the sense of taste. ... If one would enjoy food to its fullest possible extent, it is accomplished to perfection by a concentration of the mind upon the tip and sides of the tongue, and by thinking and feeling how extraordinarily good the food tastes." 21 To most people " mirth and merry com- pany " at table are too valuable as aids to digestion to be lightly banished; and if, as Mr. Fletcher says, the food is taken in small mouthfuls, there seems to be no reason why they should not indulge their desires in this respect as much as they wish. The adoption of Mr. Fletcher's system results immediately and invariably in cer- tain marked changes in the dietary habits. If a man conscientiously " waits for an ap- petite," he will find that it registers a de- mand for food not more than twice a day. As an ordinarily good digestive apparatus 2iSager: "Art of Living in Good Health," pp. 24-25. 121 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED cannot dispose of an average meal in less than six hours, and as the digestive appara- tus should be permitted a certain amount of rest, it would seem that there was every rea- son why the prompting of the appetite should be followed. Crato, one of the physicians of antiquity, said, "Eat but twice a day and put seven hours betwixt dinner and supper ; " and since his time the wisest physicians of all periods have been pleading with their patients not to send food into their stomachs until the previous meal had been disposed of. In most cases, the meal most easily elim- inated is breakfast. In the early morning when the body has been lying inert for sev- eral hours, with the utilization of heat and energy and the breaking down of tissue re- duced to a minimum, there can be no genu- ine need for food. The common declaration of the average man that he has to have a square meal as soon as he gets up "to work on " is not based on physiological principles. It is obvious that no man works on the food that is in his stomach. Food in the stom- 122 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED ach, or in any other part of the digestive tract, takes energy rather than gives it. Food becomes available only when it has been digested and assimilated. There is, therefore, no doubt that the heavy American breakfast is a most un- wholesome institution. If any food is to be taken at all in the morning it should be lim- ited to the Continental breakfast of rolls and coffee, or something equally light. Mr. Fletcher, himself, has for years made it his custom not to eat at all until he has finished his day's work. Many instances might be given of great men who have followed this plan because personal experiment had shown that the brain is clearest when the stomach is empty. On no account, however, should any marked reduction of food be made sud- denly. The best plan is not to change the dietary at the start at all, but merely to be- gin the practice of mastication — giving at- tention to the taste of the food and not to the jaw movements — and let appetite be the guide. 123 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED It will be found much easier to resist the old impulse to hurry down masses of un- tasted food if only small portions are placed on the table and served on the plate. With only a small amount of food before him, a man will make the most of it, just as a child will make a small piece of candy last as long as a big piece if he knows that the small piece is all that he is going to get: whereas, if the man is given a large portion, his ten- dency is to bolt it down without submitting it to the discriminations of taste, just as a child would bolt down candy as long as he knows there is more coming. A very few weeks of complete mastica- tion will lead, however, to an automatic re- duction of the diet to true physiologic needs, and also to a great simplification of tastes. Under the old way of eating the tendency is towards number and variety of complex, highly flavored foods; the practice of ana- lytical tasting leads to a preference for one or two dishes of simple and delicate flavor uncomplicated by sauces and condiments. The experience of almost everyone who has 124. SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED adopted the new plan is that the taste for stimulating foods of every character gradu- ally disappears. No one need try to give up meat, condiments, tea, coffee, alcohol and tobacco, because if he continues to masticate conscientiously for several months, he will have no desire to indulge in them to any harmful extent. The man who has developed the delicate instincts of taste and appetite that Mr. Fletcher has shown to be latent in every human being can restrict his diet to exact physiological requirements without impos- ing upon himself anything like self-denial. He no longer feels any temptation to in- dulge in the pernicious practice of eating to kill time* because he not only has no desire to eat except when there is a physiological de- mand for food, but he actually cannot make himself eat. When, however, in answer to the call of genuine appetite, he does sit down to his meal, he enjoys his food as he never did before. The adoption of the new system is ex- tremely likely to be followed by a sudden 125 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED and a very considerable loss of weight. This should not, however, be cause for alarm to anyone. The latest discoveries of science have proved conclusively that we know nothing whatever in regard to the relation of a man's weight to the state of his health. The tables prepared by life insurance com- panies purporting to give the number of pounds that a man should weigh in propor- tion to his height and age are mere guesses based on their observation of the fact that healthy men of given heights and ages tend to tip the scales at the same point. This proves that these men have these weights, not that they should have them. Scientific authorities do not presume to say how many pounds a man needs to carry to be in perfect health, because they do not know. Experi- ence tends to prove, however, that the old idea that fat people are the healthiest, is a fallacy, and that, as a matter of fact, it is the thin, wiry people who are likely to live longest and enjoy the best health. The ex- perience of most of us is, probably, that the best health we have ever enjoyed was in the 126 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED " spindling " period of our youth, when our extreme leanness often made us a butt for the humorous remarks of our friends. Professor Chittenden says that obesity is a condition which is distinctly undesirable and may prove decidedly injurious. " Un- due accumulation of fat," he says, " is not only a mechanical obstacle to the proper ac- tivity of the body as a whole, but it inter- feres with the freedom of movement of such, muscular organs as the heart and stomach, thereby interposing obstacles to the normal action of these structures. Further, when- ever undue fat formation is going on in the body, there is the ever present danger that the lifeless fat may replace the living proto- plasm of the tissue cells and so give rise to a condition known as ' fatty degenera- tion.' " 22 " Let any actuary of life insurance," says Dr. Edward Curtis, "be asked his experi- ence with heavyweight risks, where the waist measures more than the chest, and the long-drawn face of the business man, at 22 Chittenden: " Nutrition of Man," p. 270. 127 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED memory of lost dollars, will make answer without need of words. Then let it be noted the physique of the blessed ones that attain to green old age, and, in nine cases out of ten, spry old boys — no disparagement, but all honor in the phrase — will be found to be modelled after the type of octogenarian Bryant or nonogenarian Bancroft — the white-faced, wiry and spare, as contrasted with the red-faced, the pursy, and the stout. It is true, as has already been mentioned, that in old age much of an adventitious obesity is absorbed and disappears, but the Bryant-Bancroft type is that of a subject who never has been fat at all. And just such is pre-eminently the type that rides easily past the fourscore mark, reins well in hand, and good for many another lap in the race of life." 23 " Thorough repair of an impaired body may not be effected immediately," says Mr. Fletcher, " although wonderful results — almost miraculous — have been obtained in 23 Dr. Edward Curtis: "Nature and Health," p. 70. Henry Holt & Co., New York. 128 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED three months; but a week's faithful and at- tentive study of the possibilities of Epicure- anism, with right alimentation as its basic requirement, in adding to the comfort and enjoyment of life, will result in right eating being made physiologically and religiously habitual, and will give a backbone of Epi- curean character that will not easily suc- cumb to gluttonous impetuosity." 24 ' The result, in all cases of my observa- tion, has been an immediate response of nat- urally increased energy; approach of weight toward the normal, whether the subject was overweight or underweight; a great falling off of the waste to be discharged by the avenue of the lower intestines and also through the kidneys ; relief of bleeding hem- orrhoids and catarrh; emancipation from headaches ; clearing of the tongue of yellow deposit; and return of the energy for work which all men and women should have, and which finds expression in healthy children in the form of great energy for play." 25 24 Fletcher: "New Glutton or Epicure," p. 131. 25 Fletcher: " New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 174-175. 129 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED The following statements of the experi- ence of Dr. Hubert Higgins and Dr. Ernest Van Someren are of particular value from the fact that, as physicians, they have been able to make unusually exact and scientific observations upon themselves and therefore to arrive at particularly valuable conclu- sions. " The best period of health that I can remember in my life," writes Dr. Higgins, " was that between seventeen and twenty- one, during the time I was preparing for the medical profession. I had a small break- fast at about 7.30 A. M. and then went up to London to St. George's Hospital, which was about fourteen miles from my home. My parents gave me 2s. 6d. for my midday meal, but I fortunately economized and only spent 6d. to lOd. of it on food. After fin- ishing my work I usually arrived home at 5.30 and had a * meat tea ' ; this allowed me to devote six hours to reading. During the whole of this period I was in excellent men- tal and physical condition. I was made house surgeon at twenty-one, obtained my 130 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED degree in under four years, besides obtaining several valuable prizes. " After this I lived in the hospital, where three meat meals were provided. These I conscientiously ate ' to keep up my strength ' during the performance of my exhausting duties. I consider that this period was the commencement of my degeneration. I put on twenty-four pounds in weight and lost much of my mental energy. " My strong hereditary tendency to gout, with the excessive meat eating, the hurried eating, during some three and one-half years at St. George's Hospital, London, and at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, re- sulted in constant suffering from headache, lumbago, rheumatic pains, and all those dis- tressing symptoms known under the generic name of ' goutiness.' After seven or eight years I weighed two hundred and twenty- four pounds and complained of increasing symptoms of gout. I then became a pa- tient of Dr. H of London, whose sys- tem requires one to abstain from meat, fish, poultry, beans, tea, coffee, in other words, 131 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED from foods containing uric acid or its equiv- alent. For about five years, till the end of 1901, when I first met you, I fluctuated con- siderably in health, on the whole I am bound to say, in a steadily downward direction, till I was overloaded with the excessive weight of two hundred and eighty-two pounds. " I commenced, under your advice, masti- cating my food thoroughly at the end of De- cember, 1901. After practising this method till the present September, 1903, I have lost one hundred and four pounds in weight and consider that I have gained very considera- bly in mental and physical fitness. I prefer to divide this period into two parts: (a) The first eight months. During this time I followed my appetite, but with a strong mental bias in favour of keeping up as nearly as possible to the daily ' physiological ration ' of nitrogenous food. I lost, not- withstanding, some sixty-four pounds in weight in spite of having an inordinate appe- tite for butter, and generally taking two pints of milk daily. During this period I un- dertook some very severe work in the Lab- 132 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED oratory of Physiological Chemistry, with the object of trying to devise some method of measuring the extent of a person's de- parture from their optimum health. This led almost unconsciously to a stronger men- tal bias in favour of prescribing the amount of food one should eat, and to a certain number of experiments in feeding. To- wards the end of this period I got rather exhausted in consequence of my severe work and complained of occasional headaches. Following the suggestions of some friends, I added fifty grams of casein to my daily diet for two or three weeks. This was fol- lowed by a return of rheumatism and con- siderable sickness and inability to work, (b) The subsequent six months. I resolved to devote this period to a careful study of my desires for food — to take no notes — to make no experiments — in short, to allow my body to run itself, and to try to make my brain interpret the wants of the body. I had moved for the purpose of this experi- ment into a small house, with a boy and a woman, who came daily to clean the house — 133 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED (I mention these details because practically one finds that a woman has usually such quick sympathy about matters concerning food that their agitation and fears are enough in themselves to cause you to mod- ify your diet.) I only kept bread, butter, and milk in the house, all other foods I was obliged to send for, and if I required a dish to be cooked, I first learned how to do it myself and then taught the boy. I had no fixed times for meals, and did not have a table laid, my food always being brought up on a tray; usually I did not interrupt the work I was doing. I deliberately adopted all these precautions because I had become aware by experience of the extraordinary influence suggestion, and other mind influ- ences, such as habit, had in one's selection of food and the amount one ate. During the first two months in conscientiously eating what I wished* as much of it as I wanted and when my appetite demanded food, my desires were very irregular, ranging over meats and fish (occasionally), chocolate, sweets, cream, cheese, butter, milk, bread. 134 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED potatoes, oranges, bananas, sugar, etc., but during the final period my desires were much more simple and regular, confining them- selves to bread, Gruyere cheese, butter, cream, bananas, occasionally milk. During and subsequent to this period I have become convinced that provided you eat your food slowly and follow your appetite, without guidance from any other knowledge what- ever, you get marked preference for simple foods with increasing health and happiness, the contentment that comes from the ines- timably valuable possession of simple de- sires." 26 " Three years ago, when I first met you," writes Dr. Van Someren to Mr. Fletcher, " though under thirty years of age, and my- self a practising physician and surgeon, I was suffering from gout, and had been un- der the regime of a London specialist for the treatment of that malady. Though vigorously adhering to the prescribed diet, I suffered from time to time. My symp- toms were typical — paroxysmal pain in my 26 Fletcher: "New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 226-235. 135 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED right great toe and in the last joints of both little fingers, the right one being tumefied with the well-known ' node.' From time to time, generally once a month, I suffered from incapacitating headaches. Frequent colds, boils on the neck and face, chronic eczema of the toes, and frequent acid dys- pepsia were other and painful signs that the life I was leading was not a healthy one. Yet I was accounted a healthy person by my friends, and was, withal, athletic. I fenced an hour daily, took calisthenic exercises every morning, forcing myself to do them, and I rowed when I obtained leisure to do so. In spite of this exercise and an inher- ent love of fresh air, which kept all the win- dows of my house open throughout the year, I suffered as above. Worse still, I was los- ing interest in life and in my work. . . . " In three months after the practice of these principles my symptoms had disap- peared. Not only had my interest in my life and work returned, but my whole point of view had changed, and I found a pleasure in both living and working that was a con- 136 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED stant surprise to me. For this, my dear Mr. Fletcher, I can never repay you. My only desire has been, and is, to try and do for others in my practice what you did for me. "Now I have since that time Had occa- sional colds, headaches, and gouty pains; but, whereas formerly I could not explain their causes, I can now invariably trace them to carelessness in the buccal digestion of my food, and can soon shake them off." 27 The following paragraph, taken from the " testimonial " of one of Mr. Fletcher's lay " patients " is valuable as corroborating Mr. Fletcher's claim that his system works auto- matically to reduce the food tojtrue physio- logical needs. :< I have for some time been chewing a la Fletcher and find it of great advantage. It is getting to be automatic and is losing its irksomeness. Indeed it already seems nat- ural and produces some results ' set down in the book.' For instance, I have no desire for meats and foods which do not lend 27 Fletcher: "New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 10-17. 137 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED themselves to the Fletcher method. This in itself is a great advantage. " By the way, I have not eaten meat since the 20th of last October (nearly a year) , and I find I have gained greatly. I only desire two meals a day, except when the exigencies of travel make a light breakfast agreeable and desirable. By these means I have gained nerve force wonderfully and my muscular strength and endurance have increased so that I walk long distances and climb mountains easily. In fact, I do now with pleasure and avidity what I could not formerly do at all. They are the sort of things that are supposed to require a ' strong meat diet,' but which under such a diet were impossible to me. Mastication and thor- ough mouth- treatment seem to allow the ap- petite to prescribe what my body needs, and this is the essence and substance of your dis- covery. . . . There is no doubt in my mind but what there is a natural protection given us which has been lost by perver- sion." 28 28 Fletcher: " New Glutton or Epicure," pp. 213-215. 138 CHAPTER IV Topics: True food requirements. Reduction of pro- teid. The question of meat-eating. Vegetable proteid. Amount of fuel-foods necessary. Speci- men dietaries. Tables indicating proteid and fuel value of common foods. The question of stimulants and condiments. Physiological value of sugar. Inutility of foods as specifies. General principles. Conclusion. Tp VEN when the regulation of the dietary ■*-^ has been handed over to an appetite made normal by the practice of slow eating and analytical tasting as recommended by Mr. Fletcher, there is a certain advantage in knowing what amounts and proportions of the various classes of foods are necessary — according to the new principles enunci- ated by Professor Chittenden — to make up a well-balanced ration. It will be remembered that Professor Chittenden fixes the proteid requirement per day for a man of average — say 154 pounds — weight at 60 grams, about two 139 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED ounces a day. A man with more muscular tissue to nourish will require more proteid, and a man with less muscular tissue will not need so much. 1 Taking into consideration the fact that 60 grams or 2 ounces of pro- teid are contained in half a pound of lean beef, seven-eighths of a pound of bacon, half a pound of fresh American cheese, two quarts of milk, nine eggs, one pound of baked beans, or two-thirds of a pound of almonds; it will readily be seen that the average man with his two or three meat meals a day — often reinforced with proteid in the form of cheese, milk, eggs, nuts, beans or peas — is getting a great deal more of this particular food element than he needs or than he can use with advantage. Since meat is the form in which proteid is consumed in the largest quantities, it is obvious that the quickest and surest way of reducing the excess of proteid is by cutting down the consumption of flesh food. 2 This 1 Chittenden: "Nutrition of Man," pp. 271-279. 2 Under flesh foods are included all meats and " stock " soups. It has been shown that although these extracts of meat contain a large amount of nitrogen, it is not in the 140 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED should not, however, be taken as a recom- mendation for a sudden and absolute elim- ination of meat from the diet. If there is one point which the discoverers of the new principles in dietetics insist upon more than another, it is that all changes in the dietary should be made gradually. In regard to the matter of meat reduction Professor Fisher says : " The sudden and complete exclusion of meat is not always desirable, unless more skill and knowledge in food matters are em- form of proteid which can be utilized, but only of waste nitrogen which must be excreted. Apparently the sole virtue of such soups is that they supply the " peptogenic " stimulus. Irving Fisher, Ph. D.: "The Effect of Diet on Endur- ance." Publications of Yale University, pp. 44-45. New Haven, Conn. It is well known that Liebig came to repudiate the idea that the extractives of meat were nutritious, and that inves- tigation has shown them to be poisonous. Recently, Dr. F. B. Turck has found that dogs, mice, and rats fed on meat extractives exhibit symptoms of poisoning, and often die. The poisonous effect is aggravated by intestinal bac- teria, which find in these extractives as excellent culture medium. Irving Fisher, Ph. D.: "Diet and Endurance at Brus- sels," Science, N. S., vol. xxvi, No. 669, pp. 561-563. Oc- tober 25, 1907. 141 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED ployed than most persons possess. On the contrary, disaster has repeatedly overtaken many who have made this attempt. Pavlov has shown that meat is one of the most and perhaps the most ' peptogenic ' of foods. Whether the stimulus it gives to the stomach is natural, or in the form of an improper goad or whip, certain it is that stomachs which are accustomed to this daily whip have failed, for a time at least, to act when it was withdrawn. " Nor is it necessary that meat should be permanently abjured, even when it ceases to become a daily necessity. The safer course, at least, is to indulge the craving whenever one is 'meat hungry,' even if, as in many cases, this be not oftener than once in several months. The rule of selection employed in the experiment was merely to give the benefit of the doubt to the non- flesh food; but even a slight preference for flesh foods was to be followed." 3 3 Irving Fisher, Ph. D.: "The Effect of Diet on Endur- ance," Publications of Yale University, pp. 44-45. New Haven, Conn. 142 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED " It goes without saying that any change in diet, unless it be a change in amount only, should be gradual. Thus, if a person has been accustomed to excessive proteid, his stomach has probably become adjusted to this condition and secretes a large amount of gastric juice. When the reduction of pro- teid is sudden, the gastric juice will not at first decrease in proportion, and a large part of this secretion will therefore remain un- used. This uncombined acid interferes with the digestion of starch and the person feels a ' sour stomach.' A gradual reduction of proteid, on the other hand, will avoid this difficulty. The reduction may be more rapid (for the hyperacid) if the proportion of fat be increased, as fat tends to restrain the gastric secretion." 4 All the leaders of the movement are still divided in their opinion as to whether a com- plete exclusion of meat, even when effected gradually, is to be recommended. Profes- sor Chittenden's opinion is that " man is an * Irving Fisher, Ph. D.: "A Graphic Method in Practical Dietetics." New Haven, Conn. 143 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED omnivorous animal and Nature never in- tended him to subsist solely on any specific form of food to the exclusion of all others." . # . " Vegetarianism may have its vir- tues," he says, " as too great indulgence in flesh foods may have its serious side, but there would seem to be no sound physiologi- cal reason for the complete exclusion of any one class of food stuffs, under ordinary con- ditions of life." 5 He is emphatic in declar- ing, however, that " a diet which conforms to the true nutritive requirements of the body must necessarily lead toward vegeta- ble foods. In no other satisfactory way can excess of proteid be avoided and at the same time proper calorific value be obtained. This, however, does not mean vegetarianism, but simply a greater reliance upon foods from the plant kingdom, with a corre- sponding diminution in the typical animal foods." 6 To this discussion Professor Fisher has 6 Chittenden : " Physiological Economy in Nutrition," p. 470. e Chittenden: " Nutrition of Man," pp. 291-292. 144 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED contributed a summary of a monograph by Mile. Dr. J. Ioteyko, head of the laboratory at the University of Brussels, and Mile. Varia Kipiani, student in science, setting forth the results of their recent investigation of the relative merits of a vegetarian and a meat diet. " The authors have become convinced," says Professor Fisher, " that the vegetarian regime is for the most part a more rational one than the highly nitrogenous diet ordi- narily prevailing in Western Europe and America. The authors quote, in behalf of their conclusions, the eminent French diet- ician, Armand Gautier, ' who without him- self being a vegetarian, praises the good effects of the vegetarian regime.' The au- thors quote Gautier as follows : " * The vegetarian regime, modified by the addition of milk, of fat, of butter, of eggs, has great advantages. It adds to the alkalinity of the blood, accelerates oxida- tion, diminishes organic wastes and toxins; it exposes one much less than the ordinary regime to skin maladies, to arthritis, to con- 145 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED gestions of internal organs. This regime tends to make us pacific beings and not aggressive and violent. It is practical and rational/ " The authors, while apparently classify- ing themselves as advocates of vegetarian- ism, admit that in certain cases it is necessary to prescribe meat as a * medicament ' — ' just as one prescribes sometimes alcohol and other poisons.' The authors also observe that the transition to a vegetarian diet should be gradual. " The personal history is traced of forty- three vegetarians of Brussels. Among other interesting observations is the follow- ing: ' " * For the most part the vegetarians ap- pear' younger than their age; notably the ladies are distinguished by their clear and fresh complexion.' ' The experiments conducted by Miles, loteyko and Kipiani are restricted to vege- tarians who have been such for several years. The experiments were, for the most part, comparisons of strength and endur- 146 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED ance. So far as strength is concerned very little difference was discovered between veg- etarians and ' carnivores.' In endurance, on the other hand, a very remarkable differ- ence was found, the vegetarians surpassing the carnivores from 50 to 200 per cent., according to the method of measurement. " This result agrees with the " (Professor Fisher's) "experiment on nine Yale stu- dents described in Science. These subjects, by dint of thorough mastication, gradually lost their taste for flesh foods. At the end of five months, while not becoming vegetari- ans, they had reduced their consumption of flesh foods to one-sixth of the amount to which they had originally been accustomed. Their strength remained practically station- ary, but their endurance, according to the gymnasium tests, was increased on an aver- age by over 90 per cent. " The authors compared the endurance of seventeen vegetarians, six men and eleven women, with that of twenty-five carnivores, students of the University of Brussels. Comparing the two sets of subjects on the 147 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED basis of mechanical work, it is found that the vegetarians surpassed the carnivores on the average by 53 per cent. Comparing the two groups on the basis of the number of contractions — or, what amounts to the same thing, the length of time during which the ergograph could be continuously operated — it was found that the vegetarians could work on the ergograph two or three times as long as the carnivores before reaching the exhaus- tion point. : ' This last result corresponds to conclu- sions of the present writer in an experiment in which forty-nine subjects, about half of whom were flesh-eaters and half flesh- abstainers, were compared. It was found that the flesh-abstainers had more endurance as measured by gymnasium tests than the flesh-eaters, to the extent of from two to three fold. " The Brussels investigators found also that the vegetarians recuperated from fa- tigue far more quickly than the meat-eaters, a result also found in the Yale experiment. "The authors conclude by advocating a 148 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED vegetarian regime as a proper system for workingmen, and believe that its use would reduce the accidents on railways and in in- dustry which come from over-fatigue, in- crease the productivity of labor, as well as have other economic benefits. " These investigations, with those of Combe of Laussanne, Metchnikoif and Tis- sier of Paris, as well as Herter and others in the United States, seem gradually to be demonstrating that the fancied strength from meat is, like the fancied strength from alcohol, an illusion. The ' beef and ale of England ' are largely sources of weakness, not strength. Whether in moderation they are harmful may still be a matter of con- jecture. While the trend of recent experi- ments is distinctly against the excessive use of flesh foods, there are still needed many more experiments — medical, athletic, and in- dustrial — before the economics of diet can be established on a secure basis." 7 7 Irving Fisher, Ph. D. : " Diet and Endurance at Brus-i sels," Science, N, S., vol. xxvi, No. 669, pp. 561-563, October 25, 1907. 149 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED In another place, Professor Fisher con- cludes : " The users of low-proteid and non-flesh dietaries have far greater endurance than those who are accustomed to the ordinary American diet. ... It may be said that, whatever the explanation, there is strong evidence that a low-proteid non-flesh or nearly non-flesh dietary is conducive to endurance. . . . " The question of the extent to which flesh foods can be used advantageously is still open, but there can now be little ques- tion, in view of the facts which have come to light during the last few years, that the ordinary consumption of those foods is ex- cessive." 8 The endurance-giving qualities of a non- flesh dietary are, however, attributed by Miles. Ioteyko and Kipiani, not to its low proteid values, but to toxins present in ani- mal tissue. The chemical processes that go on in the bodies of all living creatures gen- 8 Irving Fisher, Ph. D.: "The Influence of Flesh-eating on Endurance," Yale Medical Journal, March, 1907. 150 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED erate substances which, in character and effect, are true poisons. These poisons serve their own good purposes in the bodily econ- omy, and, in the healthy organism, are readily transformed into harmless sub- stances or excreted. There is no moment in the life of a creature, however, when its tis- sues are wholly free from them. Therefore, when an animal is slaughtered for food and the chemical processes which would other- wise have disposed of its toxins are suddenly arrested, the poisons remain in the tissues and are devoured by the consumer along with the meat. A person in vigorous health can usually manage to dispose of toxins taken into his body in this fashion as well as the poisons generated by his own organism, but only at the expense of a great deal of hard work. Persons who have a tendency to manufac- ture more poisons than they can manage conveniently — for instance, gouty and rheu- matic persons who have a tendency to manu- facture an excess of uric acid — are, how- ever, almost sure to suffer unless their use 151 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED of meat is limited to extremely small quan- tities. Allied with these facts is the discovery that meat-eating apparently tends to in- crease the number and virulence of the bac- teria in the lower intestines. 9 In view of Elie MetchnikofFs recent declaration 10 that it is primarily the presence of these or- ganisms in the colon that causes the human body to break down or wear out before its time, this fact alone would seem to add con- siderable weight to the argument for re- duced consumption of flesh food. In defense of their uncompromising con- demnation of meat-eating, vegetarian dog- matists usually bring out the argument that the most spiritual and intellectual men of all ages have discouraged the use of animal- flesh for food; or quote from the Scriptures to prove that they have inspired authority; 11 9 Chittenden: " Nutrition of Man," pp. 292-293. 10 Elie Metchnikoff: "The Nature of Man," "The Pro- longation of Life." G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York. ii A favorite reference of the kind occurs in the first chapter of the book of Daniel, where it is related how the budding prophet, after having rejected the meats and wines 152 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED but the leaders of the new movement have considered the subject from a purely physio- logical view-point. On this point Professor Fisher says : "Vegetarian fanaticism has done much to defeat its own ends. From the premise — often bolstered up by theological dogma — that flesh-eating is wrong, the inference is drawn that it must be unhygienic. This reasoning is so utterly at variance with the methods of modern science as to stamp those who use it as victims of bigoted prej- udice, and to prevent any genuine scientific investigation. At present the tendency of such investigations as those of Chittenden, Mendel, Folin, MetchnikoiJ^ Caspari, Le Fevre, Fauvel and others have a distinct trend towards a fleshless dietary. And yet, such are the associations of the term ' vege- tarian,' that many are loath to grant even what is due to the tenets of ' vegetarianism.' of the king's "table and subsisted on pulse and water for ten days, was found " fairer and fatter in flesh than all the children that did eat of the king's meat," and " ten times better than all the magicians and astrologers that were in all the realm." 153 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED The proper scientific attitude is to study the question of meat-eating in precisely the same manner as one would study the ques- tion of bread-eating." 12 It is quite possible to overeat on proteid without making use of meat at all. The old-fashioned vegetarians who substituted for meat an equivalent of proteid derived from nuts, peas, beans, lentils — or, in the case of the so-called " lacto-vegetarians," eggs, and milk and the milk-products — were probably not deriving as much benefit from their abstention from meat as they should have done if they had not been so careful to replace it with non-flesh proteid — particu- larly as the non-flesh sources of proteid have many of the disadvantages of meat. Uric acid exists in large quantities in all the legumes. Eggs contain a substance known as xanthin, which is closely allied to uric acid. The decomposition products of the " ripe " cheeses, so highly prized by epicures, are only less dangerous than those of meat. 12 Irving Fisher, Ph. D., " The Influence of Flesh-eating on Endurance," Yale Medical Journal, March, 1907. 154 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED Milk is so extremely susceptible to contam- ination by bacteria that some persons have gone so far as to condemn it as an article of food except for nursing infants. Accord- ingly the restrictions in the use of meat may be applied with advantage to the meat-sub- stitutes as well. In addition to the 60 grams or two ounces of proteid, enough carbohydrate food should be taken every day to make up a total fuel value of from 2000 to 3000 calories, accord- ing to the degree of bodily activity. " The man whose work is mainly mental," says Professor Chittenden, " has no real need for high fuel values in his daily ration. For such a man, a high potential energy in the daily intake of food is an incubus and not a gain. Body equilibrium can be maintained on far less than 3000 calories per day by the brain worker. . . . Moreover, as our experiments have clearly indicated, even the man who is called upon to perform consid- erable physical work has no apparent need for a fuel value in his food of 3000 calories per day. No doubt, the man who works at 155 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED hard labor for ten or twelve hours a day will require a larger intake of fats and carbohy- drates, sufficient to yield even more than 3000 calories, but this is not true of the mod- erate worker, nor of the average man whose work is in large measure mental rather than physical." 13 The following dietary, outlined by Pro- fessor Chittenden, will give the reader a general idea of the kind and amount of food required for the proper proportions of pro- teid and carbohydrate food, and will furnish him with a basis for working out a balanced ration for himself. Breakfast. Proteid Calories One shredded wheat biscuit 3.15 grams 106 30 grams or 1 ounce. One teacup of cream 3.12 206 120 grams or 4 ounces. One German water roll 5.07 165 57 grams or 2 ounces. Two one-inch cubes of butter 0.38 284 38 grams or 1£ ounces. Three-fourths cup of coffee 0.26 100 grams or 3^ ounces. One- fourth teacup of cream 0.78 51 30 grams or 1 ounce. One lump of sugar 38 10 grams or ^ ounce. \ ounce approx.=12. 76 grams 850 i3 Chittenden: "Physiological Economy in Nutrition," p. 476. 156 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED Lunch. Proteid Calories One teacup homemade chicken soup .. 5.25 grams 60 144 grams or 4§ ounces. One Parker-house roll 3.38 110 38 grams or 1^ ounces. Two one-inch cubes of butter 0.38 284 38 grams or 1-J ounces. One slice lean bacon 2.14 65 10 grams or ^ ounce. One small baked potato 1 .53 55 60 grams or 2 ounces. One rice croquette 3.42 150 90 grams or 3 ounces. Two ounces maple syrup 166 60 grams or 2 ounces. One cup of tea with one slice lemon One lump of sugar 38 10 grams or ^ ounce. J ounce approx.=16.10 grams 928 Dinner. Proteid Calories One teacup cream of corn soup 3.25 grams 72 130 grams or 4^ ounces. One Parker-house roll 3.38 110 38 grams or 1£ ounces. One-inch cube of butter 0.19 142 19 grams or § ounce. One small lamb chop, broiled lean meat 8.51 92 30 grams or 1 ounce. One teacup of mashed potato 3.34 175 167 grams or 5| ounces. Apple-celery lettuce salad with mayon- naise dressing . 62 75 50 grams or If ounces. One Boston cracker, split, 2 inches di- ameter 1.32 47 12 grams or £ ounce. One half-inch cube American cheese. . . 3.35 50 12 grams or £ ounce. One-half teacup of bread pudding.... 5.25 150 85 grams or 3 ounces. One demitasse coffee One lump of sugar 38 10 grams or £ ounce. ■ 1 ounce approx.=29.21 951 157 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED " The grand totals for the day, with this dietary, amount to 58.07 grams of proteid (2 oz. approx.) and 2729 calories. It is of course understood that these figures are to be considered as only approximately cor- rect, but the illustration will suffice, perhaps, to give a clearer understanding of the actual quantities of food involved in a daily ration approaching the requirements for a man of 70 kilograms (154 pounds) body- weight. Further, there may be suggested by the fig- ures given for proteid and fuel value of the different quantities of foods, a clearer con- ception of how much given dietary articles count for in swelling the total value of a day's intake. Moreover, it is easy to see how the diet can be added to or modified in a given direction. If a little more proteid is desired without changing materially the fuel value of the food a boiled egg can be added to the breakfast, for example. An average- sized egg of 53 grams (2 oz.) contains 6.9 grams of proteid, while it will increase the fuel value of the food by only 80 calories. Or, if more vegetable proteid is wished for, 158 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED a soup of split-peas can be introduced, with- out changing in any degree the calorific value of the diet. Thus, one teacup of split- pea soup (144 grams, or 4§ oz.) contains 8.64 grams of proteid, while the fuel value of this quantity may be only 94 calories. The addition of one banana (160 grams, 5 J oz.) will increase fuel value 153 calories, but will add only 2.28 grams of proteid. If it is desired to increase fuel value without change in the proteid-content of the food, recourse can always be had to butter, fat of meat, additional oil in salads, or to syrup and sugar. " Such a menu as is roughly outlined, however, has perhaps special value in em- phasizing how largely the proteid intake is increased by food other than meats, and which are not conspicuously rich in proteid matter. All wheat products, for example, while abounding in starch, still show a large proportion of proteid. Thus, shredded wheat biscuit (1 ounce), which is a type of many kindred wheat preparations, from bread and biscuit to the many so-called 159 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED breakfast foods, yields about 3 grams of proteid per ounce and approximately 100 calories. Even potato, which is conspicu- ously a carbohydrate food owing to its large content of starch, yields of nitrogen the equivalent of at least three-fourths of a gram of proteid per ounce. If larger vol- ume is desired without much increase in real food value, there are always available green foods, such as lettuce, celery, greens of various sorts, fruits, such as apples, grapes, oranges, etc. Too great reliance on meats as a type of concentrated food, on the other hand, augments largely the intake of proteid food, and adds a relatively small amount to the fuel value of the day's ration." 14 The following specimen meals, taken at random from among the dietaries used by the subjects of Professor Chittenden's ex- periments, are given here as actual examples of dietaries in which the proportions and amounts of the various kinds of foods are properly balanced. 15 14 Chittenden: "Nutrition of Man," pp. 280-282. is The quantities of food in the specimen meals, which 160 SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION SIMPLIFIED Professor Chittenden 16 Breakfast — 1 cup coffee (demitasse), £ teacup cream, 1 teaspoonful sugar. Lttnch^-I shredded wheat biscuit, £ teacup cream, 1 teacup tea, J teaspoonful sugar, I small piece of apple-pie, 2 wheat