Digitized by the Internet Archive 
 in 2023 with funding from 
 Columbia University Libraries 
 
 https ://archive.org/details/bishopricstuccoo00mast 
 
BISHOPRIC STUCCO 
 -OR PL el BOARD 
 
 Built On the Wisdom of Ages 
 
 q A modern combination of 
 materials and principles — 
 that ages of actual use have 
 proven the most efficient 
 in building construction 
 
 The Mastic Wall Board & Roofing Co. 
 
 Cincinnati, Ohio 
 
HE DOVETAILED LATH 
 
 j 
 
 STUCCO-OR 
 PLASTER 
 
 NO METAL TO RUST AND BREAK 
 AWAY FROM ITS FASTENINGS 
 
 NOTE—How the Stucco-Cement or Plaster is Locked in 
 by the Dovetail Lath. 
 
 NOTE—The Heavy Coating of Asphalt Mastic—non- 
 porous; non-conductor of heat or cold. Dampness 
 cannot penetrate a perfect ‘‘Sound-Deadener”’. 
 
 Two 
 
Part One 
 
 Beginning with page fowr— the composition and construction of 
 Bishopric Stucco Board — its advantages, economy — how applied 
 to old buildings as well as new —its superiority over other back- 
 grounds for Stucco, Cement or Plaster, and our Guarantee. 
 
 Part Two 
 
 Beginning with page eleven — “Objections” to Bishopric Stucco 
 Board anticipated and answered in detail. 
 
 Part Three 
 
 Beginning with page savteen — directions for applying Bishopric 
 Stucco or Plaster Board, comparative facts and figures on costs, speci- 
 fications for Stucco, and how window and door frames should be made 
 to make watertight jobs. 
 
 Part Four 
 
 Beginning with page twenty — report of tests of Bishopric Stucco 
 Board made by H. W. T. Collins, Mech. Engr., of the University of 
 
 Cincinnati. 
 
 Part Five 
 
 Beginning with page twenty-siw — reproductions from photographs 
 of buildings constructed with Bishopric Stucco Board, and testi- 
 monials from owners and builders. 
 
 Part Six 
 
 Beginning with page seven—takes up in detail the weight, and style 
 of package. 
 
 Part Seven 
 
 Beginning with page forty-siv—takes up in detail the construction, 
 uses and merits of Bishopric Sheathing. 
 
 Three 
 
By Way 
 
 of Introduction 
 
 ITH economists, the world over, ringing 
 the changes in discussion on the vital 
 24 question of the high cost of living, the 
 yy building world has witnessed the cheer- 
 ful spectacle of building costs chopped 
 right in two. Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board has 
 revolutionized old-time building methods and made 
 possible the saving of 25% of old-time building costs. 
 Modern homes can be finished in plaster, cement or 
 stucco for just 25% less the old contract price for the 
 work before the Bishopric idea came to lighten the 
 burden of building and increase the value of the 
 work. Bishopric Stucco Board is not an experiment. 
 It is nothing more than a modern, patented combina- 
 tion of materials and principles that have been in 
 constant and successful use by master builders for 
 ages. Bishopric Stucco Board itself has stood the 
 practical test of use for years and it has always 
 “stood up” and always made | i 
 good — giving permanence to }BiRb 4 
 plaster and cement walls that 
 
 will not disintegrate and pre- 
 vents cracking, making most 23% 
 effective insulation. 
 
 vuvoe 
 
 Four 
 
A Secret 
 of the Pyramids 
 
 The dovetail locked joint in Bishopric Stucco Board holds the 
 
 ? 
 
 stucco “for keeps,” and in the Pyramids and many buildings of the 
 ancients which have defied time, the same unequaled plan of dove- 
 tailing is found. The lath used in this Stucco Board are thoroughly 
 treated with creosote, or furnished plain without creosote treatment 
 —the preservative adopted by wisest corporations in insuring the 
 greatest possible life of lumber, railroad ties, telegraph poles, etc. 
 By the very same token and for the very same reason, nothing ever 
 dedicated to modern building needs will hold its own in 
 comparison with Bishopric Stucco Board as a material 
 
 that will withstand the severest weather conditions. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board is proof against moisture 
 
 and vermin. Asphalt, successfully adapted by the an- 
 =~ cient Egyptians to preserve their mummies, is now used 
 in the form of toughened Asphalt Mastic between the 
 lath and the fibreboard backing. It is this combination of centuries- 
 old, time-tested, efficiency-proven materials and principles, “Built 
 on the Wisdom of Ages,” that make Bishopric Stucco or Plaster 
 
 Board absolutely reliable and dependable. 
 
 Saves 25% | 
 on Building Material 
 
 Choose the Bishopric System of Building and: you will save 
 at least 25% in cost of building materials, because it makes un- 
 necessary the use of lumber and building paper, saves cement and 
 gives you absolute protection against all future troubles so common 
 to ordinary plaster or stucco work. Many of the best known archi- 
 tects, engineers and builders—men who KNOW, and are recognized 
 experts in their line—agree that Bishopric Stucco Board, is the zdeal 
 
 Five 
 
background for stucco, cement or plaster. They specify it and use it 
 in the modest cottage, the artistic bungalow, the pretentious apart- 
 ment building and the modern factory. It is also popularly adapted 
 for inside walls as a background for plaster. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board means much in better work 
 for less money and enables you to BUILD ONCE AND FOR 
 ALL, giving work that is put there to STAY. 
 
 Old Houses 
 Changed to New 
 
 Scores of house owners have taken their old frame buildings 
 and quickly and at very low cost transformed them into modern, 
 up-to-the minute structures. The plan is an appealing one. It is sim- 
 ple, easy and very little money 1s re- 
 quired. All that is necessary is to 
 nail Bishopric Stucco or Plaster 
 Board over weather boarding, or 
 
 other finish, and apply Stucco. In 
 
 this way you can, without the aid of 
 Aladdin’s Lamp, enjoy the greatest satisfaction and get rid of con- 
 
 tinuous painting and repairs. 
 
 Things YOU 
 Should Know 
 
 Here are some MIGHTY GOOD THINGS TO KNOW. 
 This should be called a platform of Bishopric performance. You 
 can bank on every statement, and more than that, every square foot 
 of Bishopric Stucco Board is sold under our absolute guarantee or 
 money back if not as represented. 
 
 Laths are so keyed that they LOCK the plaster in, on and up 
 
 forever. Plaster, stucco, cement, concrete, simply cannot loosen, and 
 
 Sia 
 
fall out. The material is “locked in” for 
 keeps. 
 
 The thick layer of Asphalt Mastic in which 
 the laths are imbedded under great pressure, 
 
 is wind, weather and vermin proof and fire- 
 
 resisting. 
 Back of the asphalt is the groundwork for the wonderful, in- 
 genious construction—an extra heavy layer of fibre board which 
 
 affords further protection against weather and other conditions. 
 
 Easy to Get 
 Easy to Apply 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board comes in 25-foot lengths, four feet wide, 
 suitable for studding at standard centers. 
 
 All you have to do is to nail Bishopric Stucco Board to bare 
 studding and the walls are ready to cement. Plaster or stucco. 
 
 One man can do a “master job” and put on Stucco Board faster 
 than cement plasterers can follow. 
 
 Hand-saw, hammer and nails are all you need to apply it. You 
 save the big difference in cost of labor. 
 
 There is no waste of either material or time. Every foot of 
 Bishopric Stucco Board is utilized. You do not have to pay for 
 window and door spaces. These little “rake-offs” of old-time methods 
 are cut off and saved to you. When you order 1,000 square feet of 
 Bishopric Stucco Board you can cover 1,000 square feet of wall. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board creosoted, weighs 1,000 lbs. 
 to 1,000 sq. ft. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco or Plaster 
 not creosoted, weighs 900 lbs. to 
 1,000 sq. ft. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board is ship- 
 
 ped in rolls containing one sheet 
 
 STYLE OF SHIPPING PACKAGE. 25 ft. long, 4 ft. wide (100 sq. ft.) 
 
 Seven 
 
The Superiority of 
 Bishopric Stucco Board 
 
 Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board will take and hold ANY 
 OUTER material. 
 
 It is far superior to cement blocks, so hard to dry and pro- 
 
 ductive of a damp, unhealthy atmosphere within the house. 
 
 And here’s a big saving point to remember: A very thin con- 
 crete wall over Bishopric Stucco Board keeps the house warm in 
 
 winter and cool in summer. 
 
 The Passing of 
 Metal Laths 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board far outranks in practicability metal 
 laths, which rust, break and are the cause of so much cracking in some 
 stucco or cement houses. 
 
 For those who know, from the big expense and unsatisfactory 
 service, the days of metal laths are over and they have gone into 
 
 the discard with other things which have been surpassed by later and 
 better inventions. It is absolutely 
 impossible—as many building ex- 
 
 perts testify—to secure a good 
 
 stucco job with a light, flimsy 
 background, such as metal lath. 
 
 Wood Lath makes a rigid back- 
 
 ground, hence it can not sag. The “key” in Bishopric Lath holds 
 cement and plaster as nothing else can. 
 
 There are no good reasons why metal lath should have the 
 preference over Bishopric Stucco Board, which stays stiff and grips 
 the cement as nothing else can, forming a permanently solid back- 
 
 Hight 
 
ground. There is absolutely no “cost of upkeep” as in old-style 
 backgrounds which sag, spring and crack, costing a lot of money 
 
 for repairs as time goes on. 
 
 Costly Handicaps of 
 Metal Lath 
 
 Metal lath, for example, means big repair bills. This is a leat 
 from the Book of Experience. They rust, break, pull loose and 
 crack the walls. Very little of the flimsy background is really nailed 
 fast to its supports. Occasional nails or staples are all that hold 
 the cement walls to the studding. Once broken by the weight of 
 the walls and these loose metal backgrounds sag under the strain. 
 Cracks follow quickly. Once cracking starts it travels fast and far. 
 One never knows where it will end. The expense for repairs is con- 
 siderable. Good judgment would choose a permanent background 
 like Bishopric Stucco Board rather than one liable to suffer from 
 
 the ravages of rust. 
 
 Easy-to-Understand 
 Finance 
 
 Nine 
 
 You don’t have to be a Master of High Finance to figure out 
 this saving problem. The first cost of metal lath is greater than that 
 of Bishopric Stucco Board. To get rigid walls you must use one- 
 third to one-half more cement, if you choose metal lath. In other 
 words, if you want to double the cost of your stucco work and get 
 unsatisfactory results, use metal lath; but if a first-class, permanent 
 stucco job is what you want at 25% less cost, be certain that you use 
 
 nothing but Bishopric Stucco Board. 
 
There is absolutely no metal in Bishopric Stucco or Plaster 
 Board, hence, it can not rust. Its lath are nailed to the studding 
 and have 1,000% more holding power than metal lath as commonly 
 
 applied for stucco work. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco 
 Board Advantages 
 
 Handling “Objectors” with the Gloves of Truth. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board has made such tremendous 
 inroads upon old-time methods of building that echoes of the 
 “Hammer Chorus” of the “By-Gones” and the “Passing-Ons”’ have 
 been heard in the building world. In the face of insidious and 
 invidious comparisons, the Bishopric idea continues to meet with 
 cheerful, emphatic indorsement from the brains of the building pro- 
 fession—the architects who stake their own reputation upon Bish- 
 opric Stucco Board as a material that has been tried and not found 
 wanting. Assaults from the metal lath makers are to be expected. 
 They are fighting a losing fight with all the argument against them. 
 
 President Allison Bishopric of The Mastic Wall Board and 
 Roofing Company, has harvested a crop of the insinuations of the 
 “antis” and offers a broadside which has silenced the batteries of 
 those who have unsuccessfully tried to block the wheels of progress 
 of an institution which has backed its own faith with great works 
 which has made it possible for thousands to build and build well at 
 just 25% of the old cost, while hewing closely to the successful build- 
 ing experience of mankind all through the ages. 
 
 You may find in these fourteen articles convincing evidence in 
 
 rebuttal, an answer to any “objection” you may have heard. 
 
A Few ‘“‘Objections’’ 
 Anticipated 
 
 1. “Heat Expansion Will Buckle It” 
 
 The fact is that it is proof against this condition which metal lath is not. Wood 
 will shrink, not expand, under heat. If it shrinks, no harm is done, for the shrinkage 
 is infinitestimal and will not lessen the hold of the dove-tail on the clinch. Each 
 shrinkage will be on the separate individual lath and will not affect the sheet. The 
 lath, of course, will not be affected lengthwise. The asphalt and card backing is 
 sufficiently elastic to take up all expansion by the thickening of the backing. The 
 cement coating will expand about half an inch to fifty feet and an increase or 
 decrease of one ten-thousandth of an inch in thickness of the backing will account 
 for that amount of expansion. Thus, the backing being elastic, will overcome all 
 expansion easily. These figures cover a variation in temperature ranging from 
 six below to one hundred and thirty degrees above zero. 
 
 2. “Dampness Will Expand the Wooden Strips and Crack the Stucco” 
 
 Hleven 
 
 The lath strips are made of a resinous wood, which resists moisture, and if 
 there is any actual expansion as well as a theoretical one, it is not greater than 
 the movement of the cement mixture in its chemical action when the mixture is 
 properly made and applied. There is positively no greater tendency to crack when 
 setting than on metal lath, and actual experience shows that there is none whatever 
 on the stucco when used on stucco board, if the work is properly done. It should 
 be remembered that a richer mixture than three to one is too rich for preparation 
 of waterproofing compounds, and the surface will have a tendency to crack. A 
 leaner mixture than three to one has too much sand for proper filling of the tiny 
 spaces with cement and compounds, and is not sufficiently strong for permanency. 
 The cement mixture cannot properly perform its chemical readjustments in dry 
 and windy weather before it will set, unless the surface is sprayed; if this is done 
 there will be no cracks of any kind and if the stucco is waterproofed in its first and 
 second coats there can be no expansion of the lath strips and no after-cracking. At 
 802 Parker Street, Newark, N. J., the stucco, after setting and months of drying, 
 was kept reeking wet for about three weeks to test this point, and the result was 
 that there was not a single weakness of any kind developed. Ordinary weather 
 would never give it such a severe test as this. This building was waterproofed 
 with two pounds hydrotite to each one hundred pounds of cement on about three- 
 fourths of the building, and with a seven to ten per cent of hydrate of lime for 
 the balance as a water proofer. Actual tests showed one hundred per cent of 
 satisfactory results in each case. The third and fourth coats (both dash) were 
 one to one mixture with no waterproofing On this job there was a saving of 
 forty-five per cent of material as compared with a wire-cloth job at 74 Hillside 
 Avenue, Orange, N. J., done by the same mason a few weeks before. Cracks 
 have developed in the latter job, but not in the former. No dampness from leaky 
 windows and leaky gutters can reach the lath strips, as they are protected with 
 an absolutely waterproof sheet of asphalt mastic. 
 
3. “The Weight of the Stucco Will Tear Off the Lath” 
 
 No, it will NOT, if the lath are properly nailed, a nail being used to each 
 lath at every point where it crosses a stud, or four nails to each lath where used 
 over sheathing. A house recently stuccoed on wire-cloth in Maplewood, N. J., has 
 recently had the sad experience of having the stucco fall, due to too few staples 
 being used, and rarely are more than one staple used to each square foot. With 
 four nails in each lath strip, this stucco board will last for generations. Stucco 
 weighs from ten to fifteen pounds per surface foot, and it should be supported 
 with the nailing obtained in Stucco Board, not the few scattering staples generally 
 used. Then, again, for a nail to break it must be a clean shearing process, as it 
 must break between the lath and stud where there is no space, while the staple 
 usually holds the lath somewhat extended from its bearings. 
 
 4. “The Lath Strips Will Dry Rot” 
 
 Some say this who have seen stucco houses have their sheathing and frames 
 rot away in a few years. As the asphalt mastic will prevent dampness reaching 
 the frames, no dampness can get at the lath strips from inside, and if the stucco 
 is waterproofed as above, no dampness can strike it from without. Moreover, 
 imbedded between the asphalt mastic and the cement, completely shut away from 
 the air, there can be no air action and consequently no rot. In the everglades of 
 Florida, are logs lying in the water that have been there for centuries ; remove 
 them and expose them to the air and they will rot as other wood. Houses are 
 painted to keep away the air. Boards properly painted on both sides have been 
 known to last for centuries. Enterprising farmers have for years imbedded their 
 fence posts in waterproof concrete footing to make them permanent. These lath 
 strips imbedded between the asphalt and cement will outlive the house itself. The 
 metal lath of the cheaper grades will rust to powder in from three to five years, 
 and the better grades in comparatively shorter periods. In some of the seashore 
 towns owners have used common lath recently in the hope of getting away from 
 
 metal lath troubles. 
 
 5. “The Building Rocking In the Wind Will Tear the Backing Board” 
 
 This is distinctly untrue. A settlement of three sixty-fourths of an inch will 
 crack the walls seriously if the settlement occurs during a period of twenty-four 
 hours. Storms rarely crack the walls of a house, except real tornadoes. This 
 shows that rocking is really vibration, as otherwise the walls would equal a central 
 settlement of three sixty-fourths of an inch, and that is only about one one-hundred- 
 and-twenty-eighth of an inch to a four-foot piece of wall board. The wall board 
 is sufficiently elastic to accommodate a motion of one thirty-second of an inch at 
 each edge or a total of one-sixteenth of an inch; hence, it is four times safe. Another 
 view is that the wall board is more elastic than plastering and as plastering stands 
 ordinary storms the wall boards will still better stand them. 
 
 Twelve 
 
6G. “The Clinch Will Break Off” 
 
 Oliver Wendell Holmes in his “Wonderful One Hoss Chaise,” that ran a 
 hundred years to a day, had every point just as strong as another; there was no 
 weak point. If you use good material and put it on thick enough the outside wall 
 will be strong enough; then if there is a weakness, it will be that the clinch is not 
 wide enough, for the dovetail groove will not allow the stucco to get away, the 
 nails will not allow the wooden strips to get away, the waterproofing will not 
 allow the strips to rot, the mastic will protect from the inside, the liberal nailing 
 will not allow the weight of the stucco to give any trouble, and thus the only weak- 
 ness can be cured by making the clinch wide enough. When plastering is broken 
 away it is the clinch that fails. Look at an old plastered wall being torn down, 
 and see the clinch stay between the lath after the plastering has fallen, and it will 
 be clear to you that the weakness was the clinch not being wide enough. It could 
 not be on the ordinary lath, because the pressure of the trowel would have pushed 
 all the mortar through the wall if the lathe had been wide enough apart. On the 
 stucco board there is a mastic background, and the mortar will not pass through, 
 thus the space can be made any amount desired, and the board is supplied with 
 wide openings, which is as strong as the strongest other parts. 
 
 ~ <The Stucco Will Not Stick To the Surface of the Lath Strips and Will 
 Come Off Between the Clinch Lines” 
 
 This is partly answered in the last section. If this criticism was true then 
 all plastered walls would fall, and all old-fashioned mortar walls, all patent plaster 
 walls, all cement mortar walls, would have fallen long ago. From time immemoria! 
 mortar work on frame exteriors in foreign countries (England among them) has 
 been done on wooden lath, and this defect has not been known among the natives. 
 Ordinary lath has no surface advantage over the lath used in Bishopric Stucco or 
 Plaster Board, and the clinch is far superior in the mastic boards. 
 
 8. “It Cannot Be Used in Panelled or Half-timbered Effect Without So 
 Much Cutting that the Cost Would Be Prohibitive” 
 
 There is no occasion for such cutting. Put the stucco board on the building 
 before trimming, then use seven-eighth-inch stock instead of one and one-eighth-inch 
 and save twenty-five per cent on your pine or cypress bills. Nail your seven-eighth- 
 inch panel strips on over the stucco board and save a lot of labor as compared with 
 shipping wire lath. Remember, too, that you are saving about forty to forty-five 
 
 per cent of your mortar, as compared with metal lath work. 
 
 9. “The Shrinking of the Sheathing Will Crack and Buckle the Stucco Board” 
 
 Put the sheathing on horizontal; it is the best way; it gets more nails than 
 diagonal; it does not mislead in the location of a leak that follows the shiplap; it 
 does not pry open the house in setting, as in diagonal work, and it ties the house 
 
 Thirteen 
 
together better. Then put the stucco board on vertical. The shrinkage of the 
 sheathing cannot buckle the stucco board when end grain crosses side grain. When 
 the stucco board is put directly on the frame, put it on horizontal so that it will 
 cross the grain of the studs or wall strips. If you must use diagonal sheathing, 
 it is best to put the stucco board on also diagonally in the opposite way, so that it 
 will cross the grain. Do not be afraid to use the Stucco Board vertical. It was 
 used that way at 802 Parker Street, Newark, N. J. When the stucco is SET it 
 cannot get away because of the dovetail grooves; when it tries to slide down it can- 
 not because of the rough uneven groove. If the stucco is not washed down by a 
 hose while you are putting it on, it will adhere just as it did at Parker Street, and 
 everywhere else where it is used vertically. Remember, it should always CROSS 
 the grain of the underwood just as is the case with double floors. 
 
 10. “Eecept In Balloon Construction, It Will Buckle Where and When the 
 Intertie Shrinks” 
 
 The shrinkage of an intertie will be about one-twelfth of an inch, and it is 
 possible that in rare cases buckling could happen; but there is a sure remedy: use 
 a belt line of about the same or greater vertical measurement. For a four-inch 
 intertie use a belt line four inches or more; for a six-inch intertie use a six-inch or 
 more belt line. You should do the same thing when metal lath is used, for the same 
 risks exist. You should do the same thing in your stairways at the second and 
 third floor lines—break out a two or three-inch line in the plastering and cover with 
 a facier board running around the stair well hole, or where wall board is used leave 
 a one-inch opening. 
 
 11. “It Cannot Be Used Around the Cornice, Under Eaves, and In Other 
 Small Places, As Wire Can” 
 
 The contrary is true; it is better than wire for such places. If you use wire 
 you must always have sheathing, while this is sheathing itself. See the time and 
 cost saved in building porches—nail on the stucco board and porch is built and 
 lathed at the same time. Try it once and you will realize that it is a great time 
 saver compared with wire lath and snip shears. 
 
 12. “It Is Not Fireproof Like Metal Lath” 
 
 A salesman of the cheap kind of metal lath recently said he was ashamed to 
 sell the lath that sells at fourteen cents per square yard, as it will not last long 
 enough for him to get out of the state; to our positive knowledge such lath often 
 if not generally causes repairs to begin in about three or four years. The best 
 metal lath is the wire cloth or wire mesh galvanized, but that has been condemned 
 by the National Board of Fire Underwriters, as it is held by soldered joints, and 
 the solder melts in a fire. In one case the lath is rusted out before the fire comes, 
 and in the other case it melts, and so both fail. The stucco board has a fire-resisting 
 backing and the lath cannot burn because they are imbedded between and in asphalt 
 
 Fourteen 
 
mastic and cement. It cannot rust; it will be there when the fire comes, if it comes, 
 and it will be the last thing to go. It is, therefore, far superior to the metal lath 
 for fire resistance. 
 
 13. “It Is No Cheaper to Use Than Metal Lath” 
 
 If it were not cheaper—yes, even if it were dearer—it should be used on the 
 ground that it is better. But, listen! Good wire mesh costs five cents per foot in 
 small lots, and from three and one-half to four cents in larger lots for a whole house. 
 This sells for three cents per square foot. Then you save the waterproof paper at 
 $2.00 per roll, the furring, and the stapling, as well as the nailing of the furring; 
 adding only in this case the labor and nails of putting on the stucco board. As 
 for the cheaper metal lath, you should be ashamed to use it, but we still doubt the 
 saving. The cheapest lath that should be used or can be used with an ordinary 
 American conscience, costs twenty-five cents per yard. Add to this paper at four 
 cents per yard, and a saving in material which the stucco board makes of at least 
 eight cents per yard, to say nothing of the saving in labor which is the big item, 
 and you have thirty-seven and one-half cents as against thirty-three cents for stucco 
 board. It is a general fact that good stucco cannot be done on wire lath without a 
 loss of about twenty-five cents per yard as compared with stucco board, and that 
 is an item of $100 on an ordinary two-family house. Then comes the saving in 
 sheathing on a new house, for the stucco board is sheathing, and high grade water- 
 proof sheathing at that. This saving is about $150 on such a house. Thus, we can 
 save you $250 on the outside, and we can show you a saving of about $200 on the 
 1,000 yards of plaster on the inside by using the Bishopric Stucco and Plaster Board. 
 Thus we show a total saving of about $450, which is more than many builders now 
 make on a house (New York City prices). 
 
 14. “The Stucco Will Crack On First Coats When Setting By Reason of the 
 Lath Strips Swelling” 
 
 Fifteen 
 
 Not if you follow directions. A rich stucco will have a tendency to cause surface 
 cracks, and a lean stucco will not be permanent. A body mixture of three to one 
 with seven per cent hydrate of lime will make a satisfactory medium lean mixture 
 that will not crack if it is not allowed to set too rapidly. In cool, damp weather 
 there will be no difficulty; and in warm windy weather the setting of the cement 
 must be retarded by spraying the stuccoed surface with water. This is true whether 
 stucco board or metal lath is used. A good job can only be secured by proper 
 methods of working. If the stucco is allowed to dry too rapidly, the thinner sec- 
 tions between the clinch will set first and then when the shrinkage comes from the 
 rest of the material setting, cracks will show, as is well known in stucco work. 
 Follow these proportions and the spraying process and the results will be all that 
 can be desired. 
 
Directions for Applying Stucco Board 
 
 CARE OF THE MATERIAL—lIt is necessary to keep the Stucco 
 
 Board dry. It should be put under cover promptly on arrival and protected from 
 rain and dampness. When applied to the building it should be thoroughly nailed 
 as fast as put on so that rain will not twist the lath strips before they are fastened. 
 When once thoroughly nailed it does no harm to wet them; in fact, in dry weather 
 it is not a bad idea to sprinkle the exposed surface before applying the stucco. 
 If the lath strips are swelled they can never swell more, and if damp there will 
 not be so great a suction and consequent quick setting of the cement on the surfaces 
 of the strips. It is therefore well to have the lath strips sprayed if dry. 
 
 VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL—RBe sure to always have the lath 
 
 strips cross the grain of the under surface; if the stucco board is applied directly 
 to the studs or wall strips, it should be horizontal, but if put over horizontal sheath- 
 ing it should always be vertical. Do not imagine that the mortar will not adhere 
 to the vertical strips, for experience shows that it will with the utmost satisfaction. 
 If the sheathing is diagonal, the stucco board should also be diagonal in the opposite 
 direction, so the two grains will still be crossed. But, as there are so many reasons 
 for having the sheathing horizontal and so few for diagonal, it is hardly worth while 
 considering the diagonal method. 
 
 BRACING THE FRAME—There is really no reason for using seven- 
 
 eighth-inch sheathing in addition to the stucco board (which is sheathing). See 
 engineer's report, page 20. 
 
 WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES—For detail description illustrat- 
 
 ing how they should be made to make water-tight jobs, see page 18. 
 
 CUTTING— Saw across the lath strips with a sharp, well set saw, laying 
 
 the sheets on a bench for the purpose, or on a pair of boxes with a couple of strips 
 of scantling on top and saw between them. For lengthwise cutting, use a coarse 
 rip-saw in the sheet between the lath strips from the black side. If a sheet is 
 slightly large, remove a strip of lath and with snips cut off the sheet and replace 
 the lath as required. Small pieces may be nailed in vertical or horizontal, if the 
 nailing is done near the center of the sheathing board, the purpose being to avoid 
 action by shrinking of the sheathing boards. 
 
 NAILING—In applying Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board, it is nailed 
 
 direct to the studs, sixteen inches apart, with No. 6 galvanized wire nails, which 
 makes it absolutely impossible for this board to buckle or warp, or give you any 
 trouble whatever on the wall. 
 
 We have sold hundreds of jobs of this material which are giving the utmost 
 satisfaction and will be glad to give you references. 
 
 BREAKING JOINTS—We advocate breaking joints at least every four 
 feet, thereby avoiding continuous joint and adding greater strength and rigidity 
 to building. 
 
 We have sold hundreds of jobs of this material which are giving the utmost 
 satisfaction and will be glad to give you references. 
 
 Sixteen 
 
Facts on the Cost of Wali Construction 
 
 Seventeen 
 
 The following figures show, for comparison, the average approximate costs of 
 1,000 square feet of finished outside wall construction using (1) Weatherboarding, 
 (2) Wooden Shingles, (3) Metal Lath with Stucco, (4) BISHOPRIC STUCCO 
 OR PLASTER BOARD with Stucco. 
 
 (1) WEATHERBOARDING 
 
 1,200 square feet Boarding at $22.50 per thousand................. $ 27.00 
 Aloe ia ayy lOO ooo ou dood sooo unowecnehocusccno0oH SUE 7.00 
 1O00Rsquaresiecta sheathing bapers ..r)severnlstete lle \let-teartetteyelel- o) <1) 4.00 
 UENO? HO. ADDN? ODEs coo onrcepoasonbuessoutcbuooencbudgonaeococe 2.00 
 1,300 square feet Weatherboarding at $30.00 per thousand......... 39.00 
 LAO? tO BOON, GAMING. ca conponoonconcocnebacgencw acct cacouous abe 10.00 
 
 One coat Priming, two coats Paint (Prime, 2 gal. at $1.25 per gal. 
 IPevbnts, Sys, egies ane APLOO) fore? el) \seacoongocucansandsouese 9.50 
 iekyinias lnloaie (CPCOc oon co cu soocgsuodo0ss councogddGEdgsoouUKC 2.00 
 $107.50 
 
 (2) WOODEN SHINGLES 
 1,200 square feet Boarding at $22.50 per thousand................ $ 27.00 
 [OAH oF tO) AYO hy ENING 2 cigs oie co pawn ic aut oe Abode bao noma oMdor. 7.00 
 1OOOms(uatemtcets Sheathing la pervs ta rvelrt ene tletrene tir sven eter 4.00 
 ILAING? UO BIOS SERINE. Soe cooncoMbn Urn to boboDOOdood oun OObOUODAT 2.00 
 1OOOORSHinGleskat 55:50) persthousand crac neers ler aeleleterrelene leet 55.00 
 LEV? HO QTY SENN co cog nag onogsmiGce sop ou oonte BDO beSoBEnaRaUOe 20.00 
 Two gallons Creosote Dye or Stain at $1.25....................... 2.50 
 IPEninaeS Ilo (Ch COE) sonpoooovcds soocncnaodesocagcnsoscsc0ec 2.00 
 $119.50 
 (3) STUCCO OVER METAL LATH 
 
 1,200 square feet Boarding at $22.50 per thousand................. $ 27.00 
 ILENE WOE SENN 5 Coco nod go duGnl Fb CoUbeE ows SOgDadDUEDaOUN OC aE 7.00 
 OOO sole sien Seen nes JENA ooonesuvoooocepocuncepoonoobCe 4.00 
 Mabormtovap plye Sales. a vee mea debrstdeiis tee ais ate sistas SiGe laine 2.00 
 LOOORinealstech MuLrim os Strips rime reierersteroien stews <1) esieinehets: ties caste) Pel ekere 6.25 
 Wabor=totapply ssamierg. werdeetas alan eras ensistece esse sole share. conte site's aye avenets 2.00 
 1,000 square feet Metal Lath at 22c per square yard............... 24.42 
 Waborktorzapplyines samen a pavcrr acts Paces orl ye Cetoke tk tshs ciao 4.00 
 hreestonsauCement eo tucconatedo:00mas LOlmmaerrreireericn casein caterers 18.00 
 Labor to apply three coats Stucco at 40c per square yard........ 44.40 
 $139.07 
 
 (4) STUCCO OVER BISHOPRIC STUCCO OR 
 PLASTER BOARD 
 
 1,000 square feet Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board.............. $ 30.00 
 Mabors towapply Same. miscacrtncitie the oreo MelaeActacs ore ienstasle lees ace sraiersi 6.00 
 127 tons) mixed (Cement) Stucco’ at $6.00) per tom: -.. 4... - 4. . 52 10.50 
 Labor to apply same in three coats at 40c per square yard......... 44.40 
 
 NOE UNS Semine om Wms WHlcs oc oncanassunoonudanpbogscauees $90.90 
 
 Nore—If your local prices on lumber and other raw materials differ from the above, 
 substitute your prices in comparing the four methods. 
 
 AVERAGE COMPARATIVE COSTS PER SQUARE YARD 
 
 Wreathe road linge eed ay hey. Sek © tat, uit fete yes state as ie $1.06 per square yard 
 WV OOH SMIING Comte ta aur snits carats sce lst iaia cts ipl sa cia © Sus. S0e-e 4 Oa : 
 Stuceosnnd @iletals hatha 5 ca ackne ic os We dae as ee wee 2 25 As i i. 
 Stuccoland sbishopric Stucco Board. ¢4.00 seats oacd eee seas Sle a « 
 
 No. 4—Lasts forever. Is absolutely moisture-proof, is stronger and warmer than lumber 
 and building paper could make it, never needs painting, greatly reduces fire insurance rates 
 and costs nothing for upkeep. 
 
 In addition to this immense saving in the cost of construction, we wish to call your atten- 
 tion to the fact that the weight of the stucco is more evenly distributed over Bishopric 
 STUCCO OR PLASTER BOARD, thus lessening the danger of any unusual strain which 
 might cause your stucco wall to crack or give away. Also by mixing a small quantity of 
 
 hydrated lime with your cement stucco when preparing it, you will waterproof your stucco 
 
 so as to make it absolutely impossible for any moisture to penetrate to the board. Acids in 
 cement rust and corode the best galvanized metal lath, but acids in cement in no way 
 injures wooden lath. 
 
SIMPLE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTING WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES 
 
 Note how stucco is rounded into and under hanging stiles. This method will 
 secure air and water tight frames around the openings. 
 
 STUCCO 
 
 TESA Ay 
 PLASTER #5 
 NEE AES GSEES Ke 
 DISSES 
 
 DY 
 
 Eighteen 
 
Stucco Specifications 
 
 Nineteen 
 
 For Use on Bishopric Stucco Board 
 
 No matter what the foundation or background for the Stucco finish may be, unless the 
 Stucco itself is properly compounded the results are bound to be unsatisfactory. 
 
 Mr. Albert Moyer, member of the Associated American Society of Civil Engineers, has 
 prepared the following specifications for Stucco finishes that can be absolutely relied upon. 
 
 LATH—Secure the Bishopric Stucco Board firmly 
 by putting a nail in each lath in every stud. 
 
 PLASTER—Mix 10 parts of Portland Cement, 
 one part dry, pulverized, hydrated lime. meas- 
 ured by volume. add dry, clean sand in pro- 
 portion one part cement lime mixture, two 
 parts sand. Turn with shovels, raking while 
 shoveling, until the mixture is of a uniform 
 color. Add necessary water to make a stiff 
 plaster and turn several times with shovel, 
 raking while shoveling. 
 
 PLASTER WITH LIME PUTTY—Dry mix one 
 part Portland Cement, one part sand, just be- 
 fore using. With this mix one part lime sand 
 paste, add water to bring to proper consis- 
 tency. 
 
 N. B.—To make lime sand paste, slake 
 double strength lime for one week, strain, mix 
 one part lime and nine parts sand. 
 
 FIRST COAT—Start plastering at top of wall 
 and make surface continuous from corner off- 
 set to corner or other convenient stopping 
 place. One day’s work to be completed from 
 top to bottom of wall. Force plaster well into 
 dovetail of Bishopric Stucco Board. Scratch 
 deeply over entire surface of plaster while it 
 is wet. 
 
 Finishing Stucco Surfaces 
 
 OAKUM FINISH—Take a handful of oakum 
 about the size of your two hands bundled up 
 and work in a circular movement over the 
 surface of the stucco, not pressing too hard. 
 This should be done after the stucco is fairly 
 hard but still soft enough to receive the im- 
 pression of the thumbnail. Dampen the oakum 
 from time to time and a smooth and interest- 
 ing surface will result. 
 
 To brighten up the surface, make a_solu- 
 tion of one part commercial muriatic acid, five 
 parts water. Use large whitewash brush and 
 paint the surface with this mixture. As soon as 
 the effervescence stops, wash with hose and 
 clear water. 
 
 BRISTLEBRUSH—Another effect can be pro- 
 duced by following the above methods and 
 using an ordinary home scrubbing brush instead 
 of a piece of oakum. 
 
 WIRE BRUSH—Still another effect can be pro- 
 duced by allowing the stucco to get a little 
 bit harder and using a wire brush. The ce- 
 ment finisher will soon learn the consistency 
 to bring about the effect desired. 
 
 TILE INSERTS—If it is desirable to insert col- 
 ored clay tile in design or panels to form a 
 spot of color, this should be provided for by 
 nailing lightly to the Bishopric Board a wooden 
 block or slab 44-inch larger than the exact size 
 of the tile or panel that is to be inserted. 
 After the stucco has been applied and is hard, 
 remove the wooden block or slab and set tile 
 in much the same manner as you would set 
 floor tile. 
 
 BROOM DASH FINISH—While the last coat of 
 the stucco is still thoroughly damp, apply a 
 Portland Cement mixture composed of one 
 part Portland Cement, 12 per cent of the vol- 
 ume of the cement of well hydrated lime in 
 pulverized form, and one part of the volume 
 of the cement of fine white sand. Mix with 
 
 SECOND COAT—Mix second coat in same pro- 
 portions as first coat. Apply second coat as 
 soon as first coat will bear pressure of trowel. 
 Second coat must not be applied to any part 
 of first coat which shows any drying of the 
 surface. Make second coat from 44-inch to 
 %4-ineh thick. 
 
 THIRD OR FINISHING COAT—Mix third coat 
 same as second coat. Apply third coat as soon 
 as second coat is strong enough to support it. 
 Third coat must not be applied to any part of 
 the wall where the second coat shows any 
 signs of drying on the surface and must be 
 continuous from corner to corner or other con- 
 venient stopping place, and from top to bottom 
 of wall in one day’s work. Finish third coat 
 in accordance with specifications for finishing. 
 
 PORTLAND CEMENT—‘Vutcanire” or equal. 
 
 SAND—Well washed, coarse and well graded. 
 All sand must pass through a %4-inch mesh 
 screen. 
 
 CURING OR SEASONING—Keep entire surface 
 continuously damp for one week. If the wea- 
 ther is dry and windy, hang tarpaulins or 
 some form of cloth over surface and keep the 
 cloths wet. 
 
 water to the consistency of cream or the ordi- 
 nary cold water paint. Stir constantly and 
 apply by using a whisk broom, throwing this 
 paint on the surface of the stucco with some 
 force. This will give a very pleasing effect. 
 Keep this finish surface damp for at least six 
 days and longer if economy will permit. Do 
 not allow it to dry out in any one place during 
 the week. If the weather is hot and windy, 
 hang tarpaulins or cloths as previously de- 
 scribed. 
 
 Other finishes such as floating with a wooden 
 float and troweling, smooth surface, pebble dash, 
 splatter dash, etc., are so well known as to need 
 no further description. 
 
 If coloring matter is to be used, please bear in 
 mind that the only lasting green is what is known 
 as cromium oxide. This is quite expensive, but 
 any sort of a substitute is worthless and will 
 fade out within four or five months, making a 
 refinish of the stucco necessary. In using color-’ 
 ing matter, mix coloring matter with the cement 
 in proportions as described below. 
 
 Mix thoroughly until of an even color and mix 
 the cement with the sand. Continue turning and 
 raking until of an even color. Proportions of 
 coloring matter to cement are as follows: 
 
 GRAY, LAMPBLACK OR BONEBLACK—¥ lb. 
 to 1 bag of Portland Cement. 
 BUFF—4 lbs of yellow Ochre to 1 bag of Cement. 
 
 REDDISH BROWN —6 lbs. of Red Iron Oxide to 
 1 bag of Cement. 
 
 RED—6 lbs. of Pompeian Red to 1 bag of Cement. 
 
 GREEN 7 lbs. of Cromium Oxide to 1 bag of 
 Cement. 
 
 BLUE—4 lbs. of Ultra Marine to 1 bag of 
 Cement. 
 
 ALFRED MOYER, Associated American Society of Civil Engineers. 
 
Extracts from Report of Tests of 
 Bishopric Stucco Board 
 
 Made by H. W. T. Collins, Meck., Eng. 
 Norwood, Ohio 
 In Charge of Mechanical Engineering Laboratories 
 
 University of Cincinnati 
 
 The object of the tests was to determine the relative resistance 
 to deformation in the plane of the wall, of sections of walls made of 
 Bishopric Stucco Board nailed on studding and of sections of walls 
 
 of standard construction. 
 
 When the wind acts on the side of a building, there are stresses 
 set up in those walls at right angles to the surface upon which the 
 wind acts. ‘Those stresses tend to “rack” or cause a movement in 
 the plane of the walls, which movement, although slight, is injurious 
 to the interior or exterior plastering. ‘The tests were performed to 
 determine the resistance offered by the different types of construc- 
 
 tion hereafter described, to stresses approximating those caused by 
 wind pressure. 
 
 Page 22, Test Section No. 1, Figure No. 1. 
 
 This consisted of a frame four feet high by eight feet long, made 
 by two by four-inch rough studding spiked together with four-inch 
 (20d) wire spikes, as shown in Figure No. 1. Bishopric Stucco Board 
 was nailed to both sides of this frame with 114-inch (4d) nail in each 
 
 Jath in each stud. The laths were laid horizontally. 
 Page 22, Test Section No. 2, Figure No. 1. 
 
 This consisted of a frame of the same size and construction 
 as No. 1, but with common lath on one side and sheathing 
 on the other. The sheathing boards were one inch thick, five 
 
 and one half inches wide and eight feet long. Each board had two 
 
 Twenty 
 
nails 244 inches long (8d) in each stud. ‘The sheathing was not 
 
 dressed, nor matched, but was closely laid and securely nailed. 
 
 Page 23 is a photograph of Test Section No. 1 (with stucco 
 board on both sides of the frame) after a load of 2,650 lbs. had been 
 applied. At this load, the rule showed deformation of 1,2; inches. 
 On examination it was found that the spikes in the bottom of the 
 first stud, (C, Fig. 1) had been pulled out, allowing the stud to 
 rise. ‘Chis upward movement increased, to some extent, the deform- 
 ation as measured. ‘The paper backing of the stucco board was also 
 ruptured near the point where the stud had been pulled out. 
 
 Page 24 is a photograph of ‘Test Section No. 2 (with common 
 lath on one side and sheathing on the other), after a load of 1,650 
 Ibs. had been applied. ‘The deformation at this point was shown by 
 the rule to be 544 mches. The stud (C, Fig. 1) was pulled up in a 
 similar manner to that in No. 1, but to a less extent. 
 
 Figure 5, page 25, shows the load deformation curves of Test 
 Sections No. 1 and No. 2, plotted to the same scale. It is evident 
 
 from these curves that No. 1 is more rigid than No. 2. 
 
 Nore.—A complete report of these and other very interesting 
 tests can be had on application. Ask for “Copy of Tests.” 
 
 Ermira, N. Y., May 19, 1915. 
 
 Tue Mastic Watt Boarp anv Roortne Co., 
 
 Twenty-one 
 
 Spring Grove and Este Avenues, 
 Winton Place, Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Gentlemen—Yours of the 18th received, and in reply will say that I have just completed 
 a house for Mr. Frank S. Jones, Vice-President of the Standard Distilling Co., Cincinnati, O.., 
 who resides in Elmira, N. Y., and I used the Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board on the same, 
 which seems to please my client very well. 
 
 I am now building a house for myself and I am also using the Plaster Board—in fact, 
 I refer you to The Elmira Building Supply Co., whom I purchase these goods through. I 
 expect to close a contract tomorrow for a Boston Flat, and I am talking Stucco Board to my 
 client. If I can bring him to see how much better it is that to have us use building paper and 
 lath, I shall place another order soon. 
 
 I received the sample all O. K., but had been a user of the same for some time, as I 
 have used it on a large double house and also on a garage, and let me say that if it is properly 
 applied, I believe it the most modern, up-to-date building material on the market. 
 
 Wishing you continued success, I remain, 
 
 Very sincerely, 
 GERTRUDE S. JONES. 
 
suzburags Kaoay ig 
 
 Of UaSOY Of teem 
 
 SIYIAS BAIM 
 
 (POD) YUE ZX 
 “6 
 SayIdS HIM 
 
 (P02) Yul -E A, 
 <we af Sa41dS a41M 
 
 (002) YU! y -Z 
 
 SaYIdS DAIM 
 
 POZDYIUE-E | 
 
 Twenty-two 
 
i \ 
 
tie 
 
 EER OQVWwE_S“’ 
 
 Twenty-four 
 
as i [ig ee 
 oy g- OF 
 
 Load-Deformation Curves 
 
 Paes! 
 3 Fees for Ay 
 No.! Stuccoboard on both sides. ee 
 ES ye Sheathing on one Side, BES 
 Lath on the other. 
 
 /800 
 
 ea 
 an 
 i 
 ae 
 i 
 
 Pa 
 ea y 
 
 /600 
 
 pues 
 
 Pa eee 
 Bra 
 
 4 
 
 1200 
 
 a 
 aaaet 
 Se = 
 [| 
 Le 
 % 
 ENS 
 FEEL 
 ae 
 fies 
 a 
 S 
 ee 
 i 
 E 
 ES 
 ia 
 La 
 
 900 
 
 Al ie 
 ] ecm 
 fe Hp ttt 
 
 Load on the Platform Sc@le, Los. 
 
 es ES 
 Ba 
 Ze< 
 
 600 
 
 Twenty-five 
 
ANE 
 AU 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on this row of houses, Brook Avenue, Passaic, 
 N. J. Owners, architects and builders, Passaic Building Co., Passaic, N. J. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on residence of Karl F. Hessenmueller, 1112 La 
 Clare Street, Wilkinsburg, Pittsburg, Pa. Contractor, Arthur Vernon, Pittsburg, Pa. 
 Architect, F. W. Hessenmueller, Long Acre Building, New York City. 
 
 Twenty-six 
 
: | 
 
 fs 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on this residence at Palisades Parke Nis nC On-= 
 tractors, D. B. Owens & Bro., Palisades Park, N. J. 
 
 [ES on 
 
 Eight six-family apartments on Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Mass., built 
 by F. A. Corbett & Co., owners and builders, extending 480 feet frontage from 1,710 
 
 to 1,740. Bishopric Stucco Board used on all exteriors. Stucco contractor, Louis 
 De Angelus. 
 
 Twenty-seven 
 
Bishopric Stucco Board used on three-family apartment of Edw. F. Freeman, 
 
 Roxbury, Mass. 
 
 d used on this residence, Gallatin Street, Providence, R. I. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Boar 
 dfrey, Providence, R. I. Stucco contractor, Geo. H. 
 
 Architect and builder, E. S. Go 
 Robert, Providence, R. I 
 
 Twenty-eight 
 
Bishopric Stucco Board used on residence of Mr. H. W. Karrer, (owner and 
 builder) Troy and Beach Avenue, Ventnor, Atlantic City, N. J. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on dairy barns of Edward Jennings, Weston, Mass. 
 Architect, Russell Spring, Newton Lower Falls, Mass. Stucco contractor, M. Span- 
 kard, Waltham, Mass. 
 
 Twenty-nine 
 
Bishopric Stucco Board used on residence of W. B. Porch, owner, architect and 
 builder, Ventnor, Atlantic City, N. J. Stucco contractor, Chas. Q. Barker, 11 N. 
 Victoria Avenue, Ventnor, Atlantic City, N. J. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on residence of W. D. Govin, Union, N. J. Archi- 
 tect, Richard Hayes, Union, N. J. Contractors, Hayes Construction Co., Elizabeth, 
 
 New Jersey. 
 
 \ 
 
 Thirty 
 
awe Z 
 ee 
 
 gp eee 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on residence of Ford Knapp, Foster and Grey 
 Streets, Elmira, N. Y. Contractor, S. C. Woodside, Elmira, N. Y. Stucco con- 
 tractor, Seeley June & Son, Elmira, N. Y. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on residence of Chas. E. Near, Elmira, N. Y. 
 
 Thirty-one 
 
Bishopric Stucco Board used on duplex apartment of Chas. E. Near, W. Church 
 Street, Elmira, N. Y. Contractor, S. C. Woodside, Elmira, N. Y. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on this residence at Leonia, N. J. Architects and 
 builders, Coover-Hitchcock Co., Leonia, N. J. 
 
 Thirty-two 
 
Residence J. R. O’Connor, Arlington, N. J. Architect, C. F. Zachan, 45 Clinton 
 Street, Newark, N. J. Contractor, E. Sargent, North Arlington, N. J. Bishopric 
 Stucco Board used. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on these two duplex apartments at Arlington, 
 Mass. Contractor and builder, John C. Cameron, 59 Mt. Vernon Street, Arlington, 
 Massachusetts. 
 
 Thirty-three 
 
Bishopric Stucco Board used on this nine-family apartment, Geneva and Olney 
 Streets, Dorchester, Mass. Robt. Hamilton, architect and builder. Stucco con- 
 tractor, Jermiah Noonan. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on interior and exterior of this house and garage. 
 Plans drawn by Christiansen & Kremnitz, Architects, Milwaukee, Wis. Plastered 
 by Wm. Fred Bauman, 860 Layton Building, Milwaukee, Wis. 
 
 Thirty-four 
 
Bishopric Stucco Board used on this residence, Gallatin Street, Providence, R. I. 
 Architect and builder, E. S. Godfrey, Providence, R. I. Stucco contractor, Geo. H. 
 Robert, Providence, R. I. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on this residence at Bloomfield, N. J. Architects 
 and builders, Passaic Building Co., Passaic, N. J. 
 
 Thirty-five 
 
SERN 
 
 Owners, archi- 
 
 idence at Passaic, N. J. 
 
 is res 
 Iders, Passaic Building, Passaic, N. J. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on th 
 
 i 
 
 tects and bu 
 
 incy 
 
 Tenth and Qui 
 
 J. Dyal, 
 . Nash. 
 
 idence of John 
 
 ishopric Stucco Board used on res 
 Topeka, Kansas. Stucco contractor, W. S) 
 
 Streets, 
 
 B 
 
 ty-sie 
 
 Thir 
 
Residence on Green Lee Avenue, Avondale, Cincinnati, Ohio. Myers Y. Cooper, 
 architect and builder. Bishopric Stucco Board after stucco was applied. 
 
 Residence on Green Lee Avenue, Avondale, Cincinnati, Ohio. Myers Y. Cooper, 
 architect and builder. Bishopric Stucco Board before stucco was applied. 
 
 Thirty-seven 
 
Bishopric Stucco Board used on residence of F. A. Carleton, 13 Troy Street, 
 Lake Shore Park, Peabody, Mass. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on this row of houses at Montclair, N. J. Owners, 
 architects and builders, Passaic Building Co., Passaic, N. J. 
 
 Thirty-eight 
 
Bishopric Stucco Board used on residence of Architect Walter H. Lee, at Fern- 
 bank, Cincinnati, Ohio, for interior plastering. 
 
 fe eel eat 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on this parsonage at Woodbury, N. J. Architect, 
 J. F. Stuckert, Philadelphia, Pa. Contractor, Joseph Best, Woodbury, N. J. 
 
 Thirty-nine 
 
Bishopric Stucco Board used on residence of J. Nesselmueller, La Clare Street, 
 near Hutchison Street, Wilkinsburg, Pa. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco Board used on residence of J. F. Erickson, Mounds, IIl. 
 Contractors, Mattson, Knupp & McNew, Mounds, Ill. 
 
 Forty 
 
Satisfied Users 
 
 Boston, Mass., January 26, 1914. 
 
 Tue Mastic Watt Boarp & Roorine Co., 
 Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Gentlemen:—You may be interested to know that the writer has specified and used 
 Bishopric Stucco Board in a house that he is building. We mention this because it shows 
 our customers that we must have a good deal of faith in this material in order to use it our- 
 selves, and this information may be of value to you in pointing out to your customers that 
 your good distributors are not only selling your products, but using them. 
 
 My reason for using stucco board was principally on account of the saving in cost, 
 and at the same time, I felt that stucco board would give me fully as good a foundation for 
 stucco as any other material. 
 
 I was also anxious to put as little inside finish in the house as possible, and figured that 
 by using stucco board I could let the smooth back of the sheet show between the studs and 
 do away with any further finish on the inside of the wall. 
 
 Very truly yours, 
 WALDO BROTHERS, 
 By C. S. Watpo, Jr. 
 
 Mount Vernon, N. Y., November 11, 1914. 
 
 Buitpinc CoMMITTEE, 
 City of Mount Vernon, N. Y. 
 
 Gentlemen:—We wish to submit for your approval the Bishopric System of Stucco 
 Board, sample of which has been submitted to the Building Inspector, Mr. James R. Kain. 
 
 Realizing that it is necessary to get a material which will reduce the cost of the 
 suburban house and make building possible, we are at the same time interested in improving 
 the construction. To this end we have personally experimented with the material on four 
 houses, the result being even better than we anticipated, as up to the present time we have 
 not discovered a single crack in the entire work. 
 
 As to the insulation, we believe that the building will be very much warmer than one 
 sheathed with rough boards and covered with cheap building paper. 
 
 We invite your personal inspection of the house built by us on Nyac Avenue, Pelham 
 Heights, on which this material was used. 
 
 Yours very truly, 
 THE MILLIGAN COMPANY. 
 
 SprincrieLp, Mass., August 24, 1914. 
 
 Tue Mastic Wart Boarp & Roorimne Co., 
 Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Gentlemen:—What will you deliver Stucco Board at Springfield per 1,000 square feet? 
 I will need 1,000 square feet, perhaps 2,500. 
 
 I used it on Mr. Barton’s house at Niagara, N. C., last winter, and like it very much. 
 We used it on studding for stucco, and he has a fine looking bungalow—the best in that section. 
 
 Please let me hear from you as soon as possible and oblige, 
 
 Yours truly, 
 1, el, WOOK, 
 Contractor and Builder. 
 
 Forty-one 
 
Mr. A. D. Howard, Eastern Representative Ar.incton, Mass., February 22, 1915. 
 Tue Mastic Watt Boarp & Roorine Co., 
 Boston, Massachusetts. 
 
 Dear Sir:—Answering your inquiry as to my experience with the Bishopric Stucco 
 Board on my Stucco Houses. 
 
 I am pleased to advise that I have used this board on four two-family houses on 
 Dickson and Hills Streets, at Teale Square, West Somerville, and am entirely satisfied with 
 the results. 
 
 Two of these houses were built during the spring of 1914, and have been completed 
 and occupied since last summer. I had such satisfactory results with these two that I put 
 up two more last fall, and am building two now on Boardway, on which I will use Stucco 
 Board and have ready to be stuccoed as soon as the weather permits. 
 
 On the last two built I used your creosoted board and the creosoting has acted as a 
 preservative during the winter and enabled me to go ahead with my inside plastering and 
 finish. 
 
 I consider the Bishopric Stucco Board as the best and most satisfactory background 
 for stucco on the market. My finished houses have stood through the winter without showing 
 any cracks or signs of dampness, and I am pleased to recommend the material highly. 
 
 Yours very truly, 
 JOHN C. CAMERON, 
 509 Mt. Vernon St. Contractor and Builder. 
 
 Newton Lower Faris, Mass., November 2, 1914. 
 
 Tue Mastic Watt Boarp & Roorine Co., 
 Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Gentlemen:—In regard to the Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board I used inside and 
 outside of Dairy Houses, Cow and Horse Stables one year ago, it is very satisfactory up 
 
 to this time. 
 Yours truly, 
 
 E. JENNINGS. 
 
 Exmira, N. Y., November 7, 1914. 
 
 Tue Mastic Watt Boarpv & Roorine Co., 
 Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Gentlemen:—The writer encloses you at this time a photo of house built by him. He 
 is going to use the board on another house now in the course of construction, as it has 
 
 proven very satisfactory thus far. 
 CHAS. H. NEAR. 
 
 Very truly yours, 
 
 Bronx, N. Y., May 11, 1915. 
 
 THe Mastic Watt Boarp & Roorrne Co., 
 Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Gentlemen:—I have specified your Stucco Board in my specifications for both jobs. 
 I have used quite a lot of it, and have found it O. K. 
 Respectfully, 
 ROBERT SKRIVAN, 
 Architect. 
 
 Forty-two 
 
Mitwavxer, Wis., February 8, 1915. 
 
 Tews Lime & Cement Co., 
 North and Humboldt Sts., Milwaukee, Wis. 
 
 Gentlemen:—The Bishopric Stucco Board which we have used in the construction of 
 our work last summer has given perfect satisfaction. It was used on the inside of walls as 
 
 well as on the outside. 
 Anybody using Bishopric Stucco Board will not make a mistake. 
 
 Respectfully yours, 
 CHRISTIANSEN & KEMNITZ, Architects. 
 Per Gro. A. Kremnitz. 
 
 Boston, Mass., March 27, 1915. 
 
 Tue Mastic Watt Boarp & Roortne Co., 
 Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Gentlemen:—Last year I purchased, through Waldo Brothers, Bishopric Stucco 
 Board, as per bill of cost. 
 
 The walls have stood the winter fine, no cracks except a small hair line on each 
 corner, the result of the house heaving owing to my not having gone deeper than two 
 feet with my foundation posts. 
 
 The house stands in an exposed place and has had to stand the full force of north- 
 west winds the whole winter. 
 
 Yours truly, 
 FRANK S. ABERCOMBE. 
 
 West Franxrort, Itz., March 20, 1915. 
 
 Tue Mastic Watt Boarp & Roorrne Co., 
 Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Gentlemen:—Enclosed herewith pictures of Baptist Church and residence in which your 
 Stucco Board played an important part. 
 
 We used 100 squares in the church job for plaster, and 18 squares in the residence 
 for stucco. 
 
 The introduction given it on these jobs caused it to be used on many more here, and 
 it is certainly satisfactory in every respect. 
 
 Yours very truly, 
 W. J. REINTJES, E. M. 
 
 Awnwapouis, Mp., August 31, 1914. 
 
 Tue Mastic Watt Boarp & Roorine Co., 
 Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Gentlemen:—I am in receipt of your favor of the 28th inst., asking for information 
 about the house and store upon which I used the Bishopric Stucco Board. 
 
 The building is now completed, and it is admitted by competent judges to be a credit- 
 able structure. 
 
 I have not had the building photographed, neither have I had any thought of doing so, 
 but if you desire to have photographs made I am perfectly willing to get them done for you 
 for the purpose of use upon your files and literature. 
 
 I have no hesitancy in saying that the Bishopric Stucco Board is a splendid invention, 
 and that it is my intention to use it largely in the future where the location and type of 
 building will justify its use in the construction. 
 
 Yours very truly, 
 WALTER H. HART. 
 Architect. 
 
 Forty-three 
 
Omaua, Nesraska March 9, 1914. 
 Tue Masric Watt Boarp & Roorrne Co., 
 
 Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Your explanation to my previous letter is entirely satisfactory, and will say that I 
 am going to push this material of yours all I can in connection with my own special stucco. 
 This and your wall board go hand in hand, and with the two materials I am able to construct 
 houses much cheaper than when I use sheathing and siding, and at the same time it makes 
 a better lasting surface than any wood siding, and has a better and neater appearance. 
 
 Yours very truly, 
 VICTOR F. BECK, Architect. 
 
 Mitwavxer, Wis., January 25, 1915. 
 Tews Lime & Cement Co., 
 
 North Avenue, Milwaukee, Wis. 
 
 Gentlemen:—Some time ago your Mr. Pipkorn sold 4,500 square feet of Stucco Board 
 to me, which was used on my Cass-Wayne Apartments, located at 501 Cass Street. 
 
 This building is a four-story building, and I found I saved considerable money 
 by not using sheathing wherever this stucco was used. 
 
 Bishopric Stucco board is the best material for background for outside plaster or 
 
 stucco work that I have ever used. 
 Yours truly, 
 
 JOHN HUNHOLZ. 
 
 Mitwavxer, Wis., January 26, 1915. 
 Tews Lime & CEMENT Co., 
 
 Milwaukee, Wis. 
 
 Gentlemen.—Have used the Bishopric Stucco Board on several occasions, lately on a 
 four-story apartment building, 501 Cass Street, Mr. John Hunholz, owner, and will say that 
 it was very satisfactory and an advantage over the old way, as it saves space, labor and 
 
 material. I can recommend it and will continue to use it. 
 Respectfully, 
 J. W. ANDREE. 
 
 Architect and Superintendent. 
 
 Excuo, Wis., March 12, 1915. 
 Tue Masric Watt Boarp & Roorine Co., 
 
 Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Gentlemen:—Used your Bishopric Stucco Board last year to build garage. Proved very 
 
 satisfactory. Will use much more of it this year. 
 Yours truly, 
 
 IR Je (EAVNE IMU EIL, 
 
 Forty-four 
 
Winston-Satem, N. C., March 29, 1915. 
 
 Messrs. C. M. Tuomas & Company, 
 
 Winston-Salem, N. C. 
 
 Gentlemen:—In reply to yours of even date asking my opinion of Bishopric Wall Board 
 and Stucco Board, I wish to state with much pleasure that I have yet to hear of one complaint 
 from the many clients that I have specified Bishopric Wall Board and Stucco Board for in 
 the erection of their buildings, either dwellings, apartment houses, or, in fact, all classes of 
 buildings. I have used it in the trying climate of the North for years, including seacoast 
 towns, where it has been put to the severest test. In my opinion it is far superior to the 
 cheap grades of metal lath with which the market is flooded, that is, Bishopric Stucco Board, 
 for it will not break or rust, and takes about 25 per cent less material in the way of cement 
 than the ordinary way of using the plain lath. The Stucco Board holds the stucco as no other 
 method does, by the “dove-tail” key. I cannot speak too highly of the good qualities, and I 
 recommend its use to anyone who is desirous of having a warm dry house in winter and a 
 cool one in summer. 
 
 You are at liberty to give my name to anyone whom you think would like to consult 
 me further on the subject. 
 
 Yours truly, 
 C. GILBERT HUMPHREYS. 
 
 Architect. 
 
 Rores BRrorHers, Satem, Mass., February 9, 1915. 
 
 Builders’ Supplies, Salem, Mass. 
 
 Gentlemen:—I can say in regard to the use of Bishopric Stucco Board on the four 
 houses corner of Walter and Foster Streets, North Salem, where I have applied it on the 
 exterior, that I am well satisfied with it and believe it is the best material on the market for 
 a basis for stucco exterior. 
 
 I feel it is an economical material to use, is very easy to apply, and makes a stronger 
 and warmer job than any other method I know of. 
 
 The mastic backing to the bevelled lath prevents dampness striking through from the 
 outside, and will tend to prevent rats gnawing. 
 
 I have finished two of my houses with stucco, and shall apply stucco to the other two 
 in the spring when danger of frost is past, the Bishopric in the meantime keeping out cold 
 and dampness. 
 
 JAMES CHALEFOUR, Contractor and Builder. 
 
 Diaconat, Ia., October 18, 1914. 
 
 Tue Mastic Watt Boarp & Roortne Co., 
 
 Forty-five 
 
 Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
 Gentlemen:—I bought some Stucco Board of you a short time ago and have same on 
 my house. It is a new thing in my town and everybody is pleased with it. 
 Yours truly, 
 ROY SHEETS, 
 Contractor and Builder. 
 
Bishopric Sheathing 
 “Better and Cheaper than Lumber” 
 
 Bishopric Sheathing is made of the very same materials used in 
 Bishopric Stucco Board. It is made in precisely the same way, the 
 only difference being that the wood lath is not dovetailed. So far 
 as service 1s concerned, it is equal to Bishopric Stucco Board. The 
 same patents which cover Bishopric Stucco Board protect the exclu- 
 sive manufacture by us of Bishopric Sheathing. 
 
 Construction of Bish- 
 opric Sheathing. — Arrow 
 points to Asphalt Mastic, 
 into which laths are imbed- 
 ded. Bishopric Sheathing 
 is nailed to outside of stud- 
 ding, laths and asphalt ex- 
 posed as shown in cut. 
 Over this, weather boards 
 are nailed or cement ap- 
 plied. Used as a foundation 
 for ready roofing, Bishopric 
 Sheathing is applied to rafters, smooth side up. Used under flooring, 
 either side may be up, though lath side up may be preferred, since it 
 leaves dead-air space between laths and flooring. 
 
 Proof Against Cold and Dampness 
 
 Bishopric Sheathing is proof against heat, cold, dampness, frost, 
 wind and vermin. Being a non-conductor, it keeps the building 
 cooler in summer and saves 
 fuel in winter. 
 
 Photographic view of 
 house in the construction of 
 which Bishopric Sheathing 
 is used, lath side exposed, 
 and—note above founda- 
 tion wall—weather board- 
 ing nailed over same, insur- 
 ing a dry interior, warm in 
 winter and cool in summer. 
 
 Forty-six 
 
: Bishopric Sheathing is used with equally splendid results under flooring and roofing boards. Used under floors, 
 it serves as a sound deadener and keeps out dampness; used under the shingles, it keeps out Summer heat. 
 
 Sheathing Applied Two Ways 
 
 Illustration below shows the application of Bishopric Sheathing over rafter and studding. In application over 
 rafters, note that smooth side is up, the lath side showing up underneath the roof. In application over studding, note 
 that lath side of sheathing faces the weatherboards, leaving dead air space between lath spaces and weatherboards. Bish- 
 opric Asphalt Mastic Roofing, or Pyramid Shingles, or any other ready roofing, may be applied easily over Bishopric 
 
 Sheathing. 
 
 SSS SS 
 ee 
 SSSSsssssssss} 
 SSS) 
 = 
 
 Bishopric Sheathing is nailed to the weather side of studs, with lath and asphalt side exposed. Over the laths, 
 weatherboards are nailed or cement is applied. Compared with low grade wood, Bishopric Sheathing is preferred for 
 
 the following ten reasons: 
 
 1—Bishopric Sheathing makes a more solid and substan- 
 tial wall than lumber; therefore, develops greater 
 wind strength. There are no gaping joints; no widen- 
 ing cracks due to shrinkage; no knot holes. It’s like 
 a solid board. 
 
 2—The Asphalt Mastic in Bishopric Sheathing is a non- 
 conductor; is proof against heat and cold; keeps the 
 building cooler in summer and warmer in winter. 
 
 8—The body of Bishopric Sheathing being Asphalt Mastic, 
 moisture cannot penetrate it. The wall, therefore is 
 proof against dampness. 
 
 4—Bishopric Sheathing is proof against vermin, weevils, 
 etc. The pests cannot bore through the tough gummy 
 Asphalt Mastic. 
 
 5—In applying weatherboards over the laths, dead air 
 
 space is left between the laths, forming splendid 
 insulation. 
 
 Forty-seven 
 
 6—One wagon load of Bishopric Sheathing covers an area 
 from six to ten times as great as one load of lumber— 
 a tremendous saving in hauling. Five thousand feet 
 can be hauled in an ordinary wagon. 
 
 7—The cost of applying ordinary wood sheathing is from 
 $5 to $10 per 1,000 feet, where as the cost of applying 
 Bishopric Sheathing is but $2.50 per 1,000 feet—A 
 SAVING OF ABOUT 75 PER CENT. Furthermore, 
 1,000 square feet of wood sheathing covers but 750 feet 
 of surface, 20 per cent less being due to tongue and 
 groove. In Bishopric Sheathing 1,000 square feet 
 covers 1,000 feet of space. 
 
 8—Bishopric Sheathing does away with the expense of 
 building paper and cost of its application. 
 
 9—In applying ordinary lumber, heavier scaffolding, more 
 tools and greater scaffold floor-space are required. In 
 applying Bishopric Sheathing one man drives a few 
 nails in each sheet; a common laborer or boy can 
 finish the nailing. 
 
Where Bishopric Stucco or Plaster 
 Board May Be Used 
 
 1. Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board should be used in place 
 of lath for all interior walls, ceilings and partitions in dwellings, 
 apartments, tenements, office and flat buildings. ‘The results obtained 
 are economical and convincing. 
 
 First. You save twenty-five per cent in plaster materials, as well as twenty- 
 five per cent of the amount of labor required to put on plaster. 
 
 Second. You obtain a wall which is a perfect sound deadener and which, for 
 partition work inside dwellings, office or flat buildings has no equal for 
 sound-retarding qualities. 
 
 Third. Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board is so perfect a non-conductor of 
 heat and cold that you can keep a uniform temperature in your house 
 and have greater living comfort, with an actual saving of twenty-five 
 per cent un fuel. 
 
 Fourth. WDampness positively cannot penetrate the asphalt mastic behind the 
 lath, and your building will always be dry and healthful. 
 
 Fifth. Architects and experts proclaim Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board 
 the most up-to-date, scientific and efficient background for plaster which 
 this age has produced. 
 
 2. Don’t spend your money on wood sheathing and building 
 paper for storm protection! Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board on 
 the outside of your studding makes them entirely unnecessary. It 
 gives a more solid and substantial wall than lumber; therefore, 
 develops greater wind strength. There are no gaping joints, no 
 widening cracks due to shrinkage, no knot-holes. It’s like a solid 
 
 board. 
 
 8. Don’t ceil your cellar with lath and plaster! The constant 
 jarring above will develop cracks and loosen the plaster. Use 
 Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board! The key or dovetail holds plaster 
 like nothing else can. 
 
 4. Use Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board under your floors! 
 It will prevent any dampness from penetrating into the house from 
 the basement and it will make a wonderful difference in keeping your 
 building dry and in preventing draughts. 
 
 Live comfortably! it costs no more! You can get all the above 
 results and have the greatest living comfort possible in your home by 
 using Bishopric Stucco or Plaster Board. It will give you walls that 
 are sound-proof, moisture-proof, cold-proof, wind-proof, and in every 
 way of a substantial, everlasting construction. Indorsements from 
 our customers prove the above facts. 
 
 Forty-eight 
 
hi 
 
 AVERY LIBRARY. 
 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 
 
a 
 
 Y CEMENT AND 
 OY LATH DOVETAILED 
 \ TOGETHER 
 
 CREOSOTED LATH 
 y~ ASPHALT MASTIC 
 "WATERPROOF FIBRE BOARD