Missionary Series.] re C ¥: /SELF- SUPPORT ° | ; } { AND. i a5 “MISSION WORK “Noni INDIA MISSION. | BY REV. E. W. PARKER. A CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN DR. WILLIAM TAYLOR'S BOOK ON “‘SELF-SUPPORTING MISSIONS.” ~ ee ROHILCUND DISTRICT REPORT FOR 1882. ng Ege FL ee Eg a eT Oe Pee , : x i : NEW YORK: PRINTED FOR THE MISSIONARY SOCIETY, 805 BROADWAY. 1883. Nyaa ( SUMMARY OFv SELF-SUPPORT. ( “A reference to the statistics of the North India Con- ference in the ANNUAL Ruporr for 1882 will show that, taking the five columns, which represent the different forms of contribution ion the field, the aggregate of such contribution, or general self-support, in the Mission is $32,002 02, being more than half the appropriation from the missionary treasury. {These contributions proceed chiefly from.the Anglo-Indian population; but the Hin- dus, nearly all -paor, are learning, as will be seen in the following pages, to do their part. a GENERAL STATISTICS OF THE MISSION IN 1882. Number of missionaries, 21; assistant missionaries, 15; missionaries of the Woman’s Foreign Missionary Society, 12; European and Eurasian assistants of same society, 19; native workers of the same, 217; native preachers and other helpers, 269; native teachers, 352; members and probationers, 3,474; Sunday-schools, 339; Sunday- scholars, 14,631; Theological schools,1; students, 26; high schools, 6; pupils, 429; day-schools, 307; pupils, 9,734; orphans, 612; churches, 32; halls, and other places of worship, 313 parsonages, 59; value of church property, $198,297; value of schools, hospitals, etc., $144,255; total contributions-on the field, $32,002 02. The statistics reported at the North India Conference of January, 1883, would show much advance on the above figures in some points. Mr. Parker, it will be seen, uses in his criticism of Dr. Taylor’s book the statistics of 1881. Missionary Series.] DR. WILLIAM TAYLOR’S BOOK ON. SELF- SUPPORTING MISSIONS. BY REV. E. W. PARKER. S I am a sincere believer in Brother Taylor’s _work, I very much regret the necessity of calling attention to the errors in this book, lest I may seem to be writing against the great ¢ ood which he hag accomplished. But the fraternal letter of mine, _ written to the South India Conference, which he publishes in his book, will be proof to ’all readers that I have been and still am in hearty sympathy - with the work of the South India Conference. Many of the errors in the book, however, so injuriously “misrepresent us and our work in the North India Conference, that I feel sure it is the duty of some one to correctthem. SoI write simply to endeavor to correct the wrong impressions that the book : No. 7. A A Correction of Errors in must make, and not to say any thing against the work in India. THE TWO FIELDS. 1. In comparing the work of the North India and the South India Conferences, the different circum- stances and conditions under which they were estab- lished and exist must be borne in mind all the way through, or a false impression will be received. The work in the South India Conference, with two or three exceptions, was opened and is carried. on in the central places of India where there are Europe- ans and Hurasians residing, and where mission work has been carried on from fifty to seventy-five years. ‘So that all things were ready for.a harvest. These Europeans and Eurasians were as a rule Protestants, who were, however, neglected by the chaplains of the Government, and were in need of salvation. Brother Taylor’s work was commenced and is mostly carried on among these Christian people, and the support of the work comes from them. They — support their pastors. The work of the North In- dia Conference was established among twenty mill- ions of heathen who had never heard of the Gospel message, and where in most of the stations there - were very few Europeans or Eurasians. Ours was a work for the heathen, who regarded us as enemies, where no missions had ever been established ; theirs was in the old fields and among nominal Christians — _ who, in their neglected condition, gladly received ministers who would work for them. No. 7. rs Dr. Taylor's “ Self-Supporting Missions.” 5 SELF-SUPPORT IN EACH FIELD. 2. Where we have work among Europeans and Eurasians our Churches are also self-supporting, ex- actly as in South India. In Lucknow, Cawnpore, and Nynee Tal we have the same kind of work that characterizes the South India Conference, and it is supported in the same way. On the other hand, in the South India Conference, where they have men devoted to native work, they are no more self- ~ supporting than our men are who are working ainong the heathen. They are not supported by the hea- then among whom they labor. The native Churches also in South India are no more self-supporting than ours are. Our native Christians contribute to the support of their pastors, and in nearly all of our older stations at least one native man is fully sup- ported by each native Church. Brother Ward is re- ferred to by Brother Taylor as working among the heathen, and he “supports himself.” How? He has a very regular Income from friends, not heathen, who gladly give their charity money to him. — Be- sides this he sends out annually all over India and to friends in America a most touching report, giving full particulars of all his work. In these ways he secures the means for carrying on his mission. It is misleading to call this self-support, or to say “he supports: himself.” He is supported, and so is his work, by Christian friends of missions in India and America. The point is this: In our work and in the South India work the laborers among the heathen are supported by the Church, or by friends of the | | No. 7, 6 A Correction of Errors in missions; we by an organized plan, they by an un- organized one. The laborers among Europeans in both Conferences are supported by these Europeans, andthe native laborers, where there are native Chris- tians, are supported partially or wholly by those Christians according to the number and circum- stances of the people. The difference is simply in the manner of securing the money. CONVERTS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE MISSION. 3. Brother Taylor says, page 244, “Of the 3,228 members of the North India Conference 661 of them, including the 68 local preachers named, are employed as teachers and helpers in various departments of missionary work, and are paid by the Missionary Society. The most of these being men, they and their families constitute the Jarger proportion of this 3,228 members, and drawing their supplies from New York.” Again, on page 246, he says, ‘“‘ When I labored with them, twelve years ago, they bad a - membership of about 800, and nearly all directly or indirectly depending on the missionary appropria- tions from New York for their subsistence.”