‘ / . / t r , — » , .. \ .‘; . '-— . 2 t, ' ‘ .- - K K S. ,v . . V . _ . i ‘x, ; 1?? « ' e .0 ' - ‘ -, - V .. 2, 2 » . ‘ K it 0 fl f ._ 1 L V I ’ g I _ . II A . V V E V §iTea‘l:'e$le5i’ea‘%fi‘s5i%;i6§‘r‘°s§’rZa1‘”‘t§§°eai‘é &§’e5r“s5'r‘’65i’ta'i”t$i°t$%Stt§i3’4$i’e , e%§~?e 3% ‘5%%*’ %%%%%%%n%%%%%%%%mwW;%%%%% ‘t . .. -~ -7' ._»... ‘ —~- ' "’.‘, ‘ I‘ .1 ie if -v": Q’ r ‘ ‘-if 7 ‘ 7 » w,$$%$%%$%%$%$$%%%%%$%,,a$r%%$$$$&%%%%+ :~ 6 ,,‘.5‘.‘ 5;‘ g ,7, ~ . 4 . p i"&‘3T§-tr 4}. i r ' «A . f I ’r.-,i~;_ ’ \ ' B R " ‘ ~ -,.~,, fir t ‘E’: _ ._ ~ A 20 ’ Q ‘O 27' d .x- » "* .. i. . in 1 577, 1’ «“ ..v ' y 22' a ! - , .. x .. *v. o ' . * i p- . ,'_ I p M J _,,... . B A RLM sH,m<5 :13 ‘U 9”’ S ' .‘ ' 1;? . '3‘ "3. ‘.5 :74 r ~ ' ' " 1 ‘ ‘ i '. , V. I’. . ii 1' "iv? ‘T: i‘ i‘,?\' .- 2 , ~ ' - 4. .~ ».,,,I. . .v; 9. ~ .~ _; M r. _a 7 -~ v . ._ , «.5 5‘ xi} ‘’ .« ;{.J~ ,~. . hi‘ -' ‘- i ..|I_._. __ 1 J l ,, p i. - ~ u l P’ :5 5 f r __ . ‘H, W _; ,1. .,,.u - 1- . _ .r I day the Earl of S/2afishu.ry was brought to the i "“il' ' "Bar upon the return an altar I-Iah. Corp. direéted W: we /23? W ‘ r » i a ,, , tothe Confiable of the Tower of London; the effeél: “ pp «p eofthe ff,-turn Was, that /"lnthonypljiarl of S/aafishmy, in M ' W“ " e e the Writ mentioned, was Committed to the Tow—- " " er of London. 1 6. Fehr. Anna Darn. 1676, By vertue , . e r \\ ti of an Order from the Lords Spiritual and Temporal then in Parliarn at affembledz the Tenour of whmh Order followeth ; in hoec verhai: Iaefl ' re ’ ea: ‘c 7" ‘ / , Ordered 12)} the Lord: Spiritual and Temporal in ‘Parliament Ajfemhlea, That the it Conflahleof His Maje/ties Tower of London, hi»: flepztty, or Deputies, jhall re» ‘ ceive the {Body of James Earl of Salisbury, Anthony Earl of Shaftsbury, and Philip Lord. Wharton; Members ofthie Itlou./e, and kee p them in fafa Cu/to-V . ' ; Q ,2}, witlgint/pee [aid Tbwer,,during Hzk Majeflies ‘Plea/are, and ‘the Tleajure of 5 i n this Houfe 5 for their Contempt: committed againfl thin Hotgfe‘, and thie [hall i he a fitfficient Warrant on that (Behalf. 4 To the Conflahle of the Tower, 840. u _ Browne Cler. Par.’ The Earl of Slziaftsharfs Council prayed that the return might be Fi- led, and it was [0, and Friday following appointed for debating the fut‘. ficiency of the return, and in themean tune direétions urere green to hrs. Council to attend the Judges and Attorney General, VV1tl‘1 their exceptl-. (ms to therewm’ and my Lord was remanded till that day, and it was ~ ‘ ‘ » e {aid .§'~i » ~ I,‘ :3}. faid that though the return was filed, the Court cou cl remaudor lflm to the Mar/halfea at their Eleétion; P’ i On Friday the Earl ivas brought into Court again, and his Couflciil argued the infufficiency of the return. ‘ tihtlliams faid, That the Caufe was of great confequence, in re: gard that the King was touched in his Prerogative , the Subject was tou-e__ ched in his Liberty, and this Courtin its ]uri§Cli&_ibns_ , rfl‘. The Catife of Commitment which is returned, his not fufficient for the general Allegations of high Contempts is too uncertain, for the Court cannot judge of the Contempt, if itdoth not appear in what aét it conlills. - _ P zdly. It is not known where the Contempts were committed, and in favour of liberty, it {hall be intended they were committed out of the Houfc of Peers. ' ‘ dly. The time is uncertain, fo that, peradventure, it was before the lall Acftof General Pardon. . - r ' '_ . ’ 4t75l)'r, It does not appear whether the Commitment Were on a Cong viétion or accufation only. ‘ . _ ' c c It cannot be denyed, butthat the return of fuch ’a Commitment, by any other Court, would be too general and uncertain, Mre. 8 A 1 ivifl» was Bailed on a return, quad commijfws fiiit per‘ mandatnm. . Mi it.‘ flni. Cuflod. hfagiz. Sigil Anglia virtnte cnjnfdem contenrpfios in curia fafii, and in that Book, that divers other perfons were bailed on fuch general returns," and the Cafes have been lately affirmed in fiujhels Cafe, reported by the’ late Lord Chief juflice V aughan,‘ where it is exprelly faid that fuch Com»- mitment and return being too general and uncertain, the Court can’: be- lieve in an implicite manner, that in truth the Commitment, was for caufes particular and fufiicient. M ’ Vau3han’s Reports, 140. Accord. 2. Infl. 52, 5 3. <5‘ 5 . and the I.'RalI:.‘ 21 8. and though the Commitment of the Jurors was or _a squirting ‘Pen’ and Afcad, contra plcnam 0' manzfeflam evident iam : it was relolved to be too’ general, for the evidence ought to appear as certainly to the Judge of the return, as it appears before the Judge authorifed to Commit. Ca./2'.’ I 7. 3 out this Commitment being by thel-loufe of Peers will make no diffi- erence ; for in all Cafes where a matter comes in judgment before this Court, let the queffion be of what nature it will, the Court is obligedto declare the Law, and that without diftinétion, whether the quefiion be- gan in Parliament or no. In the Cafe of Geo.-' fBinion in Ca 3 there Was along Debate, Whether an Original Writ mg’)! 56’ Filed againft a 0f‘P4r-‘- liament, during the time o Triviledgc ; and it Was urged, that it Being during the Sefjion of ‘Parliament, the termination of the Qgeflion did belong to the Talia- men: I ft? ' (st) rnent,but it was refolvedithat an Original might betfiled, “ and Bridginw then Chief Juftice, faid that the Court was obliged tovdeclare the Law in’ all Cafes thatcame in Judgment before them. H; Ed. 4. fiat. 47.10.; in Scdfct In Debt by River V erfus Coufin, the Defendent Pleads that he was lent of a Memb-er of Parliament, (7 Idea Capi _/eu areiiamt non debetgand , thePlantiff prays judgment, and afterwards byAdvice of all the judg-f es the judgmerit was entred. Videtur Baronibzts quad tale lmlaetur Trivilegiunt nod Magnates, &c. Et eorum familiares capi [en areftzire non debent fld nullum lmhemr privilegium quad non clebent Implamtare idea 7'€fl)071Cl€t Nojier. So in Tri—- i iziniards Cafe, a quelizion of Priviledges was determined in this Court. 3)}-.. A ter.,6o.in14.. Ed. 3. in the Cafe of Sr. john, and Sir feoflryiistagztarx ‘ which was cited in the Cafe of the Earl of Clarendon, and is entred in‘ » the Courts of Weflminfter ‘ought to jiudgeitpvoide, 7. 1 8.- I-.Iu’I2.1' I i .; ; the Lords Journal. 1 A _ J y An Accord of wall, depended between them in the Common—Plea‘fe,=‘ and the Court was divided and the Record was Certified into thel-loufei of Lords, and they gave direction that the judgment {hould be Entred, for the Plantilf afterwards on a Writ of Error, brought in this—Court that Judgment was Reverfed : Notwithftanding the Objection, that it ‘Was given by order of the Houfe of Lords ; for the Courtwas Obliged to proceed according to the Law -in a matter that was before them in point of Judgment. Not long lince’ the Earl of firzflol Exhibited an AC}: cufation againli the Earl of Clarendon to the Houfe of Lords, and it con- tained divers matterswhereof fome» did arife out of Parliament,-Land, it t was referred to the judges to conlider wheth er that procedure viras Parlia- «mentaryfi, and the 4th. 166;. it was f€f0lVed by the Judges that the Lords ought not to ‘proceed on-lysupon an Impeachment by the Conj}. mons, when the matters arife out of the Houfe. I L i '_ g L The Conftruétion of all Aétsof Parliament,‘ are given, to the Coilrfs of Weflmin/ier, and accordingly they have ‘Judges of Validity of Aft: of Parliament, they have fearched the Rolls of. Parliament, Hub. r1é59.* Lord Hunrdons Cafe, they have determined whether the ]our— nal be a Record : Hub. 1 to : When a point comes before them in Judg- ment, they are not fore clofed by any Act of the Lords, but ought to judge according to the Law, by", which the Realm is Governedand not by the Lords: if it appears thatan A61: of Parliament be made by the King and the Lords Without the Commons, that Act is Felo=de- e, and accordingly they ought to do,if this return contain in it that iwhichyis ~ fatal to it Elf, it hath been a cjueliion often refolved in this Cou1:tiWhé_fi"a» 1Writ of Error in Parliament, {hall be a lirperfedias, and this Court hath determined that {hall be faidtto be ’arSeHion of Parliament, ,l.-i,’K0ll5_- 7-‘93 and if the Law were otherwifelthere would be a‘ failure of juliice if tlic fParliament were Uefolved, there Wouldlpe no quefifiori but,the Prifoner aihould be difcharged on a.Hdb€ds Corpus, ‘ and _yet then theCOll:1ri: mutt exp- i ‘ B i amine l l ,r- p ,5.-2 — ‘ ,. . P; ,7 **- it 1:” M.» ,. I 1 ,s,V,- . v «fl :. . W’ tr‘ fir?" ‘ W . .‘ K‘, 9 0 ~ arnine the taule of Coinrnitirient, an‘d;:bys Confequeiicesp a matter Parlia-9 rnentary, and the Court maynow liaye COg111ilaIi'1fC<€ of the matter, ‘ clearly as when the Parliament is Delolved, thes‘Party W_1o_uld be with-, ‘out’ remedy‘ for his Liberty, if he could not find it here, for it«‘i::‘iS‘. not fuficiw en: for;him to procure the Lords to determine their pleaafurgrfor his, Irn—.~ prifonmenti, for before his Enlargenientihe mull, .laay‘e the Pleafures of the rKing toibe determined, and that oughtto bein this Court, and therefore the Pirifoner ought'firPc to refort hither. , . _ A Let ‘us, fuppolie ( for it does not appear in the return, and the Court ought n“ot‘to Enquire of any matterout of it, ) tempt was a thing done out of the Houfeg it? would , be hard for this @_‘oihi‘i:‘3”t'*o remand him: Suppole he were removed to a Ftniraign Prifon, during the Pleafure of the Lords : No doubt, but that xvouslfcpl have been ~:an‘I*llg:"g‘Iil‘Commitment againfl; Magma Clmrta and the P€t1t1{()11'»;;ethejre,the Cloriiiriitnient would have beentlixprelly Illegal, and it II1a;§<( be this Come ernitrnentt may be no lefs 5 for if it had been Exprefly {h€\VIi1;§,31’}_1Clifrl1,€'b€ ., v._ ‘ _ ‘ . s _ A . V “ _ . “remanded, he is Com itted by this Court Whoare t0:*25I1l.W€r, for=,t~h1,s iirlprifonment. ’ C ' ’ r l * ’ ‘ he A 1 i “B: 2:, i the lirnitation of the Imprilioriinent during the eBlealiires“o'f ;th,je and the Houfe is Illegal fandzu n‘”cert?ain,:fot,_fin§e it oughtsto deterifnin ‘fijtvvo i_(3ou‘rts, itfiean have no‘ pc‘ei*tairt;P,erioidi, i3§iiiCOmH1i§§i)&L;fit until he be'Dil‘chargetl by Kings Bench and .Cb1nni1o1:1§. Pleas. *flS"j‘,f-‘I1i,1€ a“’1‘i.’.':V‘i:::if‘“‘Q,\r‘ “*‘t‘h‘,¢:tiiI’frif3ifier can"t apply himfelf inifuchseaiinaiineirttrass sito,,s0b§ia§in: ii’“£il'l‘Ii‘a"r’g“e‘."i" ‘iilli a;Mani be Comriiitted tofi~irrther"ord,ér ,€o0k?{ai£}i;ehetis_Bay»-. «,- "»1ab he p’:ef¢'nt1y,i forthat I'm§orts« till hefliaallzbetdeliitered"iri;%:gQ9d.CO11riie iiiol” Law, and if tl1‘is»Comr'nitm.ent havefnot th«at.»:Sei,;1ce, «it; is3lllegal,; for the plealiire of the King isthat which {hall he deUeirminedr~accordingfto Lawf in his Courts, as Where theSéat;;.‘of“ Weji‘m':rz:‘7ter,,r ,*l;;?Q_94[2_,;’ 1 ;*de—-i dares’ thiatihe is not reprovable", who is,talcited?@u[hels.Tc.aife, .«sV4fu,—r:‘.5rtn; 1 that ,..a mp. «and their gfixcifes -are examinable Court, fojr,,;hfer,e, »,a great diffes‘ rence between the hrrors and E,xcife,i11i.;,n4 of at Cdiirt b'e;tWeen an En-o. I1i0l1S pr0C€€Cli11gWithot1tjuriididiétiory Wliyieh is Void arndéa meer Nu1- ljty 4. H 7. 1 8. 6. in the Parliament,,the Kingwouldhave One attain it of Treafon, and lofe his Lands, and the Lords affented butnothing was faicl of the Commons, Wherefore all the Jufticyesiy clearly that it was no and was reftored to his Land, and Witihout doubt in thefame A eafe if the Party been Imprifoned, the juftices might have made i the likeirefolution that he ought toe have been difcharged. “L N L It is a folxcifme that a Man {hall be Imprilflonedby a limited ]ur_if’dic‘?ci- ‘on, and it {hall not be examinable, Whether the caufe were Within their jurifdiétion or not, ifthie Lords Without the Commons fhould grant a Tax, and one that refufed topay it fhould be _Imprifoned, tl1ie;,,']"ax, is void, butby a general Commitment the Party {hall beremedylefs if lid be the Lords lhould award a Gapias for Treafon or Fellony. A i 1 , . By thefe Inftances it appears that ,.their}i]t1rifdiétio'ni was rel’crai'ned" the Common Law, and it is iallo reftrained by divers sA€ts of Parliament, i Hevz. Cimp. 14. no Appealsfhall be made, or any Waysppurfued or A Where a Statute is made a Power is Implici,tly,given to this Court by the ct Fundamental Inltitution, which makes the judges Expofitors of‘Aé‘ts of ’ Parliament; and peradventure if all this eafeiappeared upon the return . this might be a Cale in whith they Were ~reftrained,by,thei Stat; 14., He;;,3, ii "Chap. 8- That all the Suits, Ufeinents,‘ and C ondemnations,.gz7%c; Mae, ny time from henceforth, atany time to be put oruhad upon any,” Mem-i bersf0rsar1:yBil_l {peaking or reiafoning, of any matters concerning the Par- Iiamenttito be Commtlned oruyffreatedp {hall be utterly void and of no Efheét, ‘ rioiiviit does' not : but this is a Cor-reéA_‘tion and Punifhment Impofetl upon the Earl_, contrary to the Statute, there is no queltion now . made offithe Pox-Vera the Lords, but itis only urged that it is neceffary lfgyithcm to declare Vertue,.wl1at Power they, proceed_ otheifvvife the , Liberty of every Engliflv Man he fiibjeét to the Lords, whereof they any ttlaemyagaigialt an,A,<§t,, of Parliainent, but no ufage H {can lhch a proceedingtfp _,E1/ino2“g?5 Cafe of the Poll, Netti. 19.Théi L l Duke of Sufiblk was Impeaehed the Commons} of High Treafon, and 1}/filildemenaitiors, the Lords xyere in doubt whethebrytliey fliould proceed ti on fuch a general Impeachment to Iir:r1prifonthe:,Duke, and the ad—- ififeiof the judgesbeibng d.ern_anded, andltlieir Refolution given in the Negatiye the Lords were Cafe is meiitioned de-of fign to fhew the refpieétigixrgggini ]jt}d§es, and that the have determined the higlieft inattersipiParliaineiit. 7A.t a (‘3onfere1ice.held be} tween the Lords and the L s§,{1,prili._ 4., Car. concerning, right and sPriVil‘edg'e of theSiLi,,l,)jsec‘,"t, ,declared and agreed, that no Ij“r,ee_man ought to, Committed “ or reltraiped by ,,,'iQommitment of the Kiingpor Privy Councel, i’or~a1j’i_)i7p 3othe,r,ir(,,iQtt§Nhichst1ie I-Ioufe of Peers is ’ in¢1uded,') .1 it I P 4 'iin‘cludied,) }m1e1E'fomecaufé of Commitment, Reiiraint, or Detainofi ii be iietiiortii for which by Law he ought to be Committed, (ye. i. ‘Now if“ the King who is the head of the Parliament, nor thee-Privy Councel ‘v'vhoisaCourt of State, to which iiecrecy is io neceiiaryfmayi ‘ not Impriioiiwithout ihewing cauiie a fortiori f The Lords in, Parliament , «efesvgv i V .‘$"""’ ' Céiflifs \7VhiCh are a Court of Law as well as a Court of State, and there» ‘ fore ought not to proceed in an Illegal manner, tis true in 1. Rolls. 1 92.7 Ruflm2ortlv.r Caie, Cook is of Opinion that the Privy Councel may Commit P P without ihewing cauie, but in his more Mature Age, he was of another P Opinion and accordingly the Law is declared in the Petition oi: §>miti) argued to the fame purpoie, and i aid a Judge cannot make a, judgment unleis the Fact appears to’ him and on an Habeas Corpus, the Judge can only take notice of the Fact returnied, it is lawful for any Sub-4 jeéts that finds himieli agrieved by any Sentence or judgrrient to Petitign the King in an humble manner for redreis and Where the Subjeét is -re- i’train‘ed of his liberty the proper place for him to apply himielf ‘unto is this Court which hath the Supream Power as to this ‘purpoie, over 311 Courts and on an Hdbeas Corpus Iihuing hence, the King ought m have an Account of his Subjeft Rolls. Hub. Corp. 64. Witberlies Cafe and though the Commitment be by the Lords, yet if it be Illegal, this Cou1't is O; A bliged to diicharge the Priioner, as Well as if he hzzid been Illegally"Imt. priioned by any other Court ; the Houie of Peers is a high Court ‘butthe Kings fiend; hath ever been Inftruéted with the Liberty of the7Subje€t and if it Were otherwiie in caie of Impriionment by the Peers the Pow: ./ er of the King was leis abiolute than the Powerioi the Lords.’ - It does not appear but that this Commitment was for Breach of the Priviledge, but nevertheleis if it were,this Court might give relief as ap~* pears in Sr. George §8z°omore3 Cafe before cited and M512. :2. Edi i 4. Rat, 2.0. for the Court which has Power to judge what is Priviledge‘ has am, bower to judge What is Contempt of Priviledge if the Iudges may judge’ of an Act of Parliament, Afortiori, they may judge (if an order of the Lords. 20. Ed. .’Butcloers cafe, where he in Revertion brought an Aaiou of \Y/’ai’t, and dyed before judgment, and his Heir brought an Afition‘ " for the flame Wail, and the King and theiLords determined that it did lie P and commanded the judges to give Judgment accordingly For the tim , to come, but by Ryley. 39. it appears that it is only an Order of the K‘ E and the Lords, and that was the cauie the judges conceived that mi) were notbouncl by it, but 39. 3. 1 3. and ever fince haw Tud Gdth?’ contrary if it be admitted. for that for Breach of tPriviledge ‘ina E Cot 6 min) yet it ought to appear on the Commitment that that was thii C "IP. for othetwiie that may becalled aBreach, whigh jg 031), 3 refuf If a” Cf fiver to a matter whereof the Houfe of Lords is refh-amend to hoifpltfaagl); I ...,m,, i V" ts») Stat. of the 1 it. of He;2.o,. and for a Contempt Conimitted out of Hufe they cannot Commit, for the Word Appeal in the Statute extends A Vito all Mifdemeanors, as it vyas refolved by the Judges in the Earl ofClci¥ _, .;.;.-i;~g;m’o;z’s Cale, 1 66 3 . If the Imprifonment be not lawful the.Court cannot remand him to his wrongful Imprifonment, for that would be an A8: of Injultice, to lmprifon him, 93 720220 Vaucg/azzn. i 56. It does not “appear whether the Contempt was a Voluntary A6}, or an Opinion, oi: - an Inadvertency, and he has now fuflered five Months Imprifonment al-4 ready, falfe Imprifonment is not only Where the Commitment is unjuft-, but where the Petition istoolong. 2171]}. 5;. In this Cale if this Court icannot give Remedy, peradventure the linprifonment fhall be perpetu-3 al for the King as the Law is now taken may Adjourn the Parliament for lil0,0_1'2OY€'a1"S. P e . W - But all this is laid on Suppofition that this Sefiion has Contir1'"uanlce,,_I'cone3 iceivethat theKings givinghis, Royal Allent to feveral Laws which has been Enaié?ted,the Seflion is determined,anc_l then their order for the Impiri-9 l~()inm€11tlSi2tll‘O determined Brook Parliament.‘ 86. Every Selliori in which the King Signs Bills is a.day of it felt, a Seflioii of it felf, 1‘. Cam .7. A Spe- cial Aét is made_,the giving the Royal Allent to feveral Bills, {hall not de-« termine the Sefiion. ( ’T is true, tis there laid to be made for the avoiding all Doubts.) In the Stat. ‘16.Car. 1 .There is a Promife to the fame purpofe, and alfo 1'2.€zzr.2.1 . and 22. and 2.3.Cctr.'2.2.I.1 1:’1{o.2.No.1z.' , By the Opinion of Cook. 4.. 27. the Royal Aflent does not deter‘?-"_ mine, but the Authorities on which he relies, don’t Warrant his Opinion, for firltin the Parliament, R0114 .H. 7. ltappearsthat the Royal Allen: ‘Was given to the A62, for the reverfal of the Attainder of the Members of Parliament 5 the fame day it was given to the other Bills, and the fame “Year thefame Parliament Afiembled again, and then tis Probable, that the Members which had been attained were prefent and not before, 8 2 . No. 1 3. is only a Judgment in Cale of Treafon, by Vertue of a Pow- , ei"reTerved to them on the Statute 25. Ed. 3. Rot. Parliament.‘ 7. H; 4.. between the King and the Houles, {oi No.7 is not an§‘,Aél: of Parliament, 14. Ed. 3. N. 789; The Aétis firlt e'ntred""on the Roll, but on Condition the King will grant their other Petitions, the Inference my Lord'Coo/<)mal1_/lag, or‘ of the Lords :1 and if it WCfC‘OthCrW1fC, ‘)7€C5i5tl1Ci’i' A ‘Kiiig could pardon the Contempt under the Great Seals; aor2:dpifa- it i_Cl1fl1.‘,_gC the ImprifonmentundertlieJ?riVy;Seali.' ~ . Ifhall not fay What would be tliemconfequenee ( as to; this (plTlfQl1II1Cl1t)“lf tlieSeflion were ClCtCf111111€(l5 for that is not the pie: ‘charge the Earl. ‘Q ‘tifflilu Jtifliee. C The Return no doubt is illegal giblilit; quellioin is of aPointof]urifdi;:1ion, Whether it maybe e’xarrfiined =hei*e;? ‘ ‘ This Coutt'Caii’t; nieddlewith the ‘Traiifaéhotis of the mofi High ‘ ‘Court of Peers in Parliament. during the Sefhon, W’hie‘h is .eji_e+ termined 3 and thereforeithe certainty orfuncettainty oftlie _.tL11‘I11’Sl10t111;1(cI'l(il», ;fQf_itlSl10ti€Xa1I1i1113.l3lCil]Ci‘C: but ifthcisgg iionhad been eleteriniiied, my OPl1]l;Ofl would be, tliat l1C Ought itobep difeharged. C A v" .- ifiainfiffizfl CliiefJu{‘ti"ce.i ThisCourtiih:/is .Cati._{e, “ and therefore the Form of tl1esR—eturn is not*et.)‘:fnficl",erable, “We ought not to extend our Juiriifdifcioii beyzond its, due limits ,. ii and ‘Ch? 35300115 Of AI1C€Pctors'oo will nttsiratraiateiiisriin fiicihan Attempt. » l t T he Confequence would be very ‘inifehietvous ‘if";thiS Céfurt mould deliver a Memberof the Houfe of .tPeer$.~.£U33. who are committed, for thereby the bufinefs of Parliament -be retarded : for it niay be the C_Q._;II1_n1it1h€nfjW3S fQI3- evil b_e;li,a,v_i} oiiigor undeeent ‘reflections on other Membfe\rs., to the Idifturbaggie of the Affairs of Parliament. p p \ — ‘ ’ s "' t ‘The Commitment in this cafe is not forf '» n-, C execution of the Judgment given by the rds for the Contempg F . . J‘ ..r~§- .? V 5. r . .2 2.2: if 7- 3 and therefore if he fhould bi: bayled, heavzoiildbe i(IlC,_l‘l;VClI,C_i§l}:()l?1§ .o‘f.'CXCCuti0n5 for a Contempt in facie Czzme there‘ issno oi§hC...B Judgment or Execution. e i i ' ~ A p This Court has no Jurifdié‘tion , and remanded. Ideliver no Opinion iwshethesrit-:would iothcifwiffir in cafe otaProi‘ogation. C i ;;:Y 1* . ‘vv emtsmujuiiicc was abfeiit, buthe cieiiied. Juiiice i . date that his Opinion was, That the Pairtv ought tobe B;em.andegl; ‘ And foihe was remanded byithe Court. ' 1' F I 1 ntinuimeeof : the ‘.;lI11‘P,IlfQ§1ni€i1E,i has fent‘Cafe but; as the cafe is, the Courtcanneither'Bayl not p..D.pjf. ei.:Cufisodit;l:ut l1i€Ii:S.iliI;1 RARE KD 371 . T7 S5 1 677 uuvuurn as snow: - oowuu ELL SPC RRE RARE D ||IIK| iii|if|f|W|||||\I 01 O-007243379