. .' n"^ <>-'.■ ,' -2-' < o . ^^' yt ^ Lis ''^ 0> c " " ° « ■* . , -is • * A^ c> "^ A' V' ,• "-i. '<^^ '^■•V ./ C> > ^-^ .^^''^ A 4-'' Vf*' .^-' UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLICATIONS IN POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-67, pis. 1-8, 15 text figures June, 1920 THE WHALING EQUIPMENT OF THE MAKAH INDIANS by T. T. WATERMAN SEATTLE, WASH. PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY 1920 CONTENTS Page Introduction 4 Alphabet ustd in rtcording Indian words 5 The "Chinook" Canoe 9 The name "Chinook" 9 Comparison with the canoes of other j)arts of the Pacific coast 10 "Rating" of canoes 12 The hull 1 i Features of the luill described bv jjrevious writers 1 i Additional notes on the hull 16 ]5ow and stern pieces 16 Shape of the hull 19 Interior fittings 20 Care of the Indl 22 Ornamentation 22 Sails and rigging 23 Features of the rigging described by ])revious writers 23 Additional notes on rigging 21 Defects of the canoe 26 Paddles 26 Information contained in previous accounts 26 Additional notes on the paddle 27 The Canoe-bailer 27 The WiiALiNJi H \nPoox \nd Its Accessory Devices 29 The liarpoon shaft 29 Information contained in previous accounts 29 Additional notes on the harpoon shaft 29 The harpoon licad 30 Information contained in jirevious accounts 30 Additional notes on the harpoon head 31 The whaling lanyard 34 Notes on the lanyard containci.? in iirevions accounts 34 Buoys or floats 31' Features of the sealsHiin buoy or float described by other writers 31 Lines and ropes 37 n; •f A. NOV 5 1920 COXTEXTS Page p The Wmale-hun't 38 Religious observances connected with whale hunting, as described by other writers 38 ^ Arrangement of equipment for whaling H *^ The pursuit of the whale H •Ilj Disposition of the whale carcass i-ii (^ Religious observances connected with bringing in the whale i6 r. Method of navigation 17 Histoi-y of the whaling industry IT Bibliography 50 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES Plate 1. Making a "Chinook" canoe. Plate 2. "Lighthouse Joe," with his harpoon and buoys ; a canoe under sail. Plate 3. Along the Makah coast. Plate 4. The harpooned whale. Plate 5. Removing the skin from a whale carcass ; baskets for carrying harpoon- heads. Plate 6. Cutting up the whale. Plate 7. The last of the whale. Plate 8. Head of the whaling harpoon. text figures Figure 1. Dugout canoe from Northern California (Yurok tribe). 2. Two t3'pes of canoe found in the Pacific Northwest; a, the "North Coast" model; b, the "South Coast" or Chinook model. 3. Diagram showing the nomenclature of the canoe. k Diagram showing the ornamentation on the prow, viewed from above. 5. The shape of the "Chinook" canoe; a, the appearance of the bottom, b, the appearance of the canoe viewed from in front. 6. Diagram showing the cross-section of the canoe. 7. Diagram showing the lashing which liolds tlic thwarts in place. 8. Canoe sail and rigging. 9. Diagram illustrating the weave employed in a sail of cedar-bark matting. 10. Canoe-bailer of alder-wood; a, the bailer; b, attachment of the loop or handle, viewed from above; c, diagram sliowing how the bailer is clutched when in use. 1 1 . Tip of harpoon shaft. 12. Diagram showing the assembling of the parts of the whaling harpoon- head, a, the bone "hafts" or barbs, viewed from one side ; b, the cut- ting edge viewed from above ; c, the complete head. 13. The float or buoy; a, the complete float with its attachments; b, detail drawing showing the nipple and plug for inflation. II'. Diagram showing the arrangement of the huntsmen and their equijinient in the whaling canoe. 15. Diagram showing the cutting-up of the wliale. 4 INTRODUCTION The present study was undertaken because of the presence for a time in the city of Seattle of a member of the Makah tribe, Mr. C. Peterson, of Neah Bay. ^Ir. Peterson is well informed concerning the life of his people, and has had for many years a certain intellectual interest in the details of jirimitive culture, especially with reference to his own group at Cape Flatter}'. The State Museum on the Campus of the University supplied the various objects described below; man}' of them being specimens collected by James G. Swan at Cape Flattery a number of years ago. Several important printed works have appeared in the past, which deal with the material culture of the Makah or their close neighbors. These works are cited in detail in a terminal bibliography on page 50. The most recent of them is the famous series of volumes entitled "The North American Indian." by Edward C. Curtis. The eleventh volume of this great work, dealing specifically with the Nootka and the Haida, includes numerous notes on the tribe which is the subject of the pres- ent study. A much earlier work by another author, "The Indians of Cape Flattery," by James G. Swan, deals with a larger number of topics than does the book by Curtis, but in a more schematic way. Swan's sj'stem of transliterating Makah words is less accurate than Curtis' method. The most important paper on the primitive peoples of this region is a monograph by Franz Boas, "The Kwakiutl of Vancouver Island." This famous work contains descriptions of devices and processes, printed in the form of texts in the native Kwakiutl dialect. The present writer has not dealt in detail with any of those matters which are discussed by these earlier observers. Where Boas has described a process, for example that of separating spruce root into fibers, it seems unnecessary to go into that particular matter again. What he says of technological processes among the Kwakiutl is practically all applicable to the Makah. Boas' description is incomparable for the various manufactures and the detailed processes involved in them. Curtis' ])rincipal interest, on the other hand, is in ceremonies. His admirable account of the ceremonial practices performed in con- nection with whaling, as carried on by tribes adjacent to the Makah (such tribes as the Nootka, Quilliute, Quinault, and Kwakiutl), presents a very clear pictui?. What this author says of the ceremonial practices of neighboring tribes ajjjjlies perfectly well to the Makah. Where the accounts of these previous writers nverln)). their mate- rial is summarized and put in the form of an abstract. The photographs illustrating the whaling industry are tlie work of .\sahel Curtis, Esq., of Seattle, successor to the Romans Photo Company, and they are reproduced by arrangement with him. The line drawings were done by Sara Vinsonhaler of the Department of Design of the University of Washington. Alphabet Used in Recording Indian Terms. — Many sounds occur in Makah which are not present in English. Swan^ spells tlie Indian words as best he can with the ordinary English alpliabet. with the result that the words as he gives them often do not sound like Makah. Curtis has a more complete set of symbols. His list does ' For nuthorities oitofl, sit tin- tcniiiiuil lil ]ift:;r)U:hy ni p. ro 6 U'alcrman [Vol. 1 not, however, represent all of the jMakah sounds. To describe the phonetic elements of this dialect seems to be somewhat troublesome ; unless they are expounded in physiological terms which are of no interest to the casual reader. The usual resource on the jjart of authors who have to describe sounds such as these is to avoid "accurate" physiological terms, which seem uselessly difficult; using instead certain "general" terms, which, in most cases fail to convey any accurate idea of the sound as it is spoken b}' the Indian. The following notes may serve to give some impression of how the Makah words sound to the present writer. I think practically all of their spoken sounds are here represented. i, as in machine u, as in rule (, as in pin v, as in full e, as in fete o, as in note £, as in met o, as on in ought a, as in hat a, as in bar A, as in but DIPHTHONGS ai, as in aisle oi. as in boil SEMIVOWELS w, y, substantially as in English CONSON.\NTS Labial- Contin- Affrica- Affricative Stop ised stop uant tive Nasal Lateral lateral covjfc, c^Pi. c^osfe. Labial Dental P t b d p' t' s ts ts' Alveolar c tc tc' Palatal k g g' kw kw' X Velar Glottal q y q' qw qw' h,' L 1 tl, tL The consonants are sounded approximately as thej' are in English, except for the following: Fortis Sounds — These are "exploded" or "cracked" consonants produced with the vocal organs in the position for the ordinary sound, but with hard pressure. The 1920] Makah Indians 7 release is very sudden but the rush of breath is slight. The combination produces a sharp sound, markedly different from anything in English. The sound itself is very brief, but the firm "closure" which precedes it is often prolonged. As indicated in the chart, these fortis sounds are of various types {p, k, t, etc.), and are of frequent occurrence. The sj'mbol which represents them (namely, '), is explained below. Labialized Stops — The nature of these sounds is indicated fairl}- well by the symbols chosen to represent them. Continuant Sounds — The symbol c stands for a simple sound which is represented in English usage by a combination of two symbols, namely * and h, as in the English word "she." The .r indicates a sound made by friction of the breath between the back part of the tongue and the palate, as in German ach. This sound resembles ordinary English h, except that the friction is more pronounced, the passage between the tongue and the palate being greatly narrowed. Affricative Sounds — These consist essentially of a continuant preceded by, and "fused" with, a "stop." The symbol ts in Makah has approximately the value it has in English, the two elements being pronounced as one sound. I think the sound is more properly represented by one symbol, but no convenient symbol exists. As is not the case in English, this ts sound in Makah is very frequent at the beginning of words. The tc represents the combination of t with the c sound described above. Lateral Sounds — One sound which does not exist in English, but which is extremely frequent in Makah, is represented by L. This sound has the same rela- tion to ordinary I that English p has to English h. namely the organs are in the same position, but the vocal cords are not employed. Curtis represents the sound by a combination of h with I. This combination may give a distant hint of its effect on the ear. Aifricatiz'c-lateral Sounds — These have the same relation to the laterals tiiat the ordinary aft'ricatives have to the stops ; the lateral affricative, namely, is a lateral which enters into combination with, and is "fused" with, a "stop" which precedes it. Velar Sounds — These sounds, often described as "gutterals," are produced very much in the fashion of ordinary A-, as it is in kick, but the contact is much further back in the mouth. A little practice enables an English-speaking person to produce these sounds without any difficulty. The "stop" is represented by q, and the corre- sponding continuant by y. Glottal Sounds — The most noteworthy of these is a "glottal stop" ('). Be- tween vowels, this symbol indicates an interruption of the breath by a closure of the larynx, which closure is achieved by drawing the vocal cords completely across the passage. This is a commonplace action, performed, for example, in the process of coughing. When used in connection with consonants, this symbol represents a "stress" or "explosiveness," in wliicli a glottal closure is probably one factor. The effect of this explosion produces on the ear a "cracking" of the consonant, wliich is very noticeable and striking in the speech of the native Indians. 8 Waterman [Vol. 1 Note. — The symbols used in the above tabulation are based on the report of the Committee of the American Anthropological Association on the phonetic transcription of Indian languages." The sounds of ]\lakah correspond, almost throughout, to the sounds of the Kwakiutl language as described by Boas in the opening pages of his monograph already mentioned. The sound which Boas describes as resembling ky and which he writes as h, I have written hy; and similarly with his x, etc. I heard both s and c in Makah, and also the aflricatives, ts and ic. although in Kwakiutl only s and its affricative ts occur. What Boas says of the other sounds of Kwakiutl, seems to my ear to apply to the sounds of Makah. As with Kwawiutl, t, d and * are very far forward. In the language as spoken by Mr. Peterson, they were actually dental. OUier Symbols Employed — Prolongation of a vowel or consonant is indicated by ( •), a period above the line. More pronounced prolongation is represented by a colon ( :) following the symbol for the sound. A period between two vowels indicates that they do not form a diphthong. Long-continued and non-grammatical ))rolongation, as in rhetorical exclamations, is represented by -f-. The symbol " indicates that the preceding consonant was pronounced with an (or ii) position of the mouth. Superior letters indicate in general whispered or weakly articulated sounds. The symbol (<) indicates the presumable derivation of a term ; or marks the word with which a given expression is associated in the mind of the Indian. I am not sure of the etymological accuracy of all of these derivations. In man}' cases they are undoubtedly correct. In explaining the meaning of Indian terms, literal translations are preceded by (=). Square brackets are used, as they are ordinarily, to mark the writer's editorial comments, where such comments are necessary. -See "Report on tlie iilionetlc tiansi'riftioii i.t Iii'lian liuisuasts," in tlic hilpliosriapliy .m p. r,0 below. THE "CHINOOK" CAXOE Probably the most important factor in the whaling industry of the Makah is the canoe. They procure their food supplies for the most part from the open sea. In the latitude of Cape Flattery the Pacific Ocean is very boisterous, and good boats coupled with good seamanship are essential for a seafaring life. The hunting grounds for whales lie along the shore, and the great animals, especially certain species, sometimes come quite close in, but on the other hand the hunt often takes the Indians entirely out of sight of land. The halibut banks, also, which are the mainstay of their existence, and more important from the point of view of their food economy than is the killing of whales, lie from iive to thirty miles off shore. Under these circumstances, specialization in matters connected with the canoe takes on the very highest importance. Better canoemen than the Makah have probably never existed. I learn also that their boats deserve the very highest place for staunch sea- worthiness, coupled with great manageableness and speed. The Makah use only one type of craft, the so-called "Chinook" canoe. This type of canoe is a dugout, hewn, except for a superimposed bow and stern pi<;ce, from one cedar log. The particular model which is popularly spoken of as the "Chinook" canoe, is illustrated in Figure 2, b. The use of this model is charac- teristic of the whole of Puget Sound, and of a region stretching some distance to the north and south along the coast. I am not familiar with the exact limits of the area, but the Columbia River is included in it (Curtis, Vol. 8, Folio, Plate 265 shows that boats of this type are used by the Wishram, living at the great cascades of this stream). The use of this canoe characterizes the whole coast of Washington, and a large part of the west coast of Vancouver Island. The Nootka and Clayoquot, near Nootka Sound, use imposing specimens made along this model. In fact, there is evidence that this type of boat originated with them.^ They manufacture a large number of the boats whicli are in use at the present day, and supply them to the tribes on Puget Sound and southward, either directly, or through the Makah. As pointed out by Swan,** the Makah themselves do not make canoes to any great extent, because their territory does not furnish the best cedar. They, however, depend upon the canoe for all purposes, including the winning of their livelihood. The "Chinook" type of canoe used by them in common with other tribes has never been adequately described, so it may appropriately be taken up in detail here. It is as much used by the Makah, and as skillfully handled, as by any tribe, even though they do not as a usual thing manufacture their own boats. THE NAIIE "cHIXOOk" This word, "Chinook," holds a high place in the affections of the Northwest. Primarily the name of one small sub-lribe, living at the mouth of the Columbia River, it has become associated through historical accident not only with a type of canoe, but also with a certain "jargon language," and with a warm southwest wind. The ' Lewis, 1906, p. 1C3. ' 1870, p. 30. 10 U'atcniian [Vol. I wind does not concern us here; but the jargon language which passess commonly under the name "Chinook," is, like the canoe, the product primarily of the Nootka,^ living on the west coast of Vancouver Island, many hundreds of miles to the north of Chinook territory. The term Chinook has long been in use, in connection with the "jargon," and the canoe, and I think this usage, in spite of its inaccuracy, deserves to be followed. COMPARISON WITH CANOES OF OTHER PARTS OF THE PACIFIC COAST There is a good deal of similarity in the dugout canoes used by the various tribes along the whole Pacific Coast, including the tribes of Southern Alaska, those of Northern California, and all the coast tribes in between. South of the Columbia River, however. Indian boats are not very large, nor are they at all seaworthy. They are built on what the northern Indians would call a "shovel-nose" model. The bot- tom, that is to say, is rounded in cross section, but somewhat flatter toward the bow and the stern, which are cut off square, as in the "punt" of civilized communities. These squared ends are crowned up in a sort of peak, to relieve their clumsy appear- ance, and among the California tribes a carven ornament rides upon the prow. Such boats are excellent for quiet water, and are quite speedy, but the Indian takes his life in his hands if he goes very far to sea in one of them. This is the type of craft which the great Vancouver mentions, in connection with his exploration at Port Orford, in Oregon, in the year 1792: "Their canoes, calculated to carry about eight people, were rudely wrought out of a single tree ; their shape much resembled that of a butcher's tray, and seemed very unfit for a sea voyage or anj' distant expedition." Pro, 1 — Dugout canoe from Northern California (Yurok tribe). University of California, Museum of Anthropology, ("ataloK NuMil.cr 1/1700. I.i-ngth, IS foot (,^).nO moti-isl. • See Meany, 1907, p. 44. « 1798, Vol. 1, p. 204. 19201 Makah Indians 11 This type of boat is the one used at the present time by the Yurok along the Klamath River, in Northern California, and by their neighbors. Figure 1 shows a characteristic Yurok specimen. This is exactly what we would expect to find, if a knowledge of navigation, and a specialized industry in canoe-making, had become gradually diffused southward from a center somewhere north of the Columbia River. The same general type of craft is known along the coast of Washington, and a close relative is found among the tribes of British Columbia, but it is used only in navigating estuaries, rivers, sloughs, creeks and other quiet waters. In other words, as we go southward, the size of canoes diminishes and we find fewer models in use, until in northern California but one type, and that a relativesly poor one, has survived. The "Chinook" canoe is in many ways an excellent model. It is very large, is pointed at both ends, and carries lofty carved prow and stern pieces. It is perfectly "fit" for use on the high seas. On the eastern coast of Vancouver Island, and north- ward among the Indians of the British Columbia coast and Alaska, a slightly differ- ent type of canoe is in use. This northern craft differs enough in externals of design from the one last mentioned to be easih' distinguishable. If we call the second the "Chinook" model, we may speak of this third type perhaps as the "Northern" model. These "Northern" canoes, of which the Haida make probably the best specimens, are very large in size, .exceeding the "Chinook" specimens (though the latter in extreme cases reach a length of fifty feet or more). The northern boat is also more elaborately ornamented. The main differences in shape are that the northern model has a vertical cutwater, and an oblique stern, while the Chinook model has a sloping cutwater, and is vertical at the stern. These differences are illustrated in Figure 2. b Stern NORTH COAST c Cross section amidships. MODEL. /, Cross section amidships. CHINOOK MODEL I.- Two types of se The "northern" model is drawn from a Haida specimen (University of Wash- ington, State Museum, Accession No. 271); the "Chinook" model is from a minia- ture canoe made of alder, Makah tribe (Catalog Number 26;)8). 12 Jl'atcniuvi [\'o\. 1 The difference just mentioned has been pointed out by previous writers. Niblaok in Plate 3t of his "Coast Indians of Southern Alaska," illustrates it with a plate. In his drawing, however, he has turned his Haida boat end for end, placing the stern where the bow ought to be. This misrepresentation may be the error of his draftsman. Niblack's own remarks, however (on page 295 of his work), seem to indicate that the two ends of the boat are confused with each other in his memory. The bow of the Haida boat, as may be noticed in Figure 2 on this page, does at first glance seem to be designed for a stern. The best canoes in this Northwestern region, whether of the northern or the Chinook model, show an outward "flare" in the side just below the gunwale. The Makah boats exhibit this feature, and Curtis mentions it as charac- terizing the canoes of Puget Sound (Curtis, Vol. 9, p. 60). Its purpose is to keep waves from curling into the boat in rough weather. It hardly seems that so slight a protection could have much effect, yet I am assured that the presence of the flare makes the boat behave quite differently in a sea. The Makah say that the "northern" or Haida boats lack this feature. Niblack, on the other hand (p. 295 of his work), says that the northern models have it, while the Makah or "Chinook" specimens lack it. The truth very likely is that the use of this flare depends upon the skill of tlie individual carpenter. The only Haida canoe which I have had a chance to examine (a University of Washington specimen), did not have this feature. I doubt, liowever. in view of Niblack's remarks, that the lack of it is characteristic of any particular tribe. The "northern" boats, says Niblack, "have projecting prows, higii, spur- shaped sterns, flaring gunwales, and a gracefully rounding or curving cross-section, although without any distinct keel. The latter have the blunt, straight stern, a grace- fully curving bow, but a flat bottom, with little curve in the cross-section." This type is "heavier, roomier, stronger, less cranky, and more durable than the Haida type, but the latter is swifter, handier, and more buoyant." The present writer's Makah informant says that the Haida canoe is not so "dry" as the Makah boat, nor is the Haida boat, they say, so easy to handle. The Makah canoe ships no water except in the wildest weather, and is even then easily kept free with a bailer (for this ingenius utensil see below page 27). The Haida canoe, possibly on account of its liigh stern, is said to be particularly good in a following sea. "rating" of canoes As remarked above, most of the tribes of the Pacific Northwest liave \arioiis styles of craft, for use under special circumstances. For example, they often have flat-bottomed and blunt-nosed canoes for use in still waters, and along creeks and rivers. The !Makah spend their time in the turbulent waters around their cape, and use their sharp-nosed sea-going Chinook canoes practically to the exclusion of every- thing else. The only variant is a small wide boat, "with a stern at both ends." which is used by young people before they can be trusted to handle the big canoes. Tliey use, however, various sizes of canoes. The general term for canoe is tc'A'p.Ats (Chap-ats, in the notation given by Swan). Niblack mentions four ratings as gen- erally recognized among tlic Indians': (1) Hunting and fishing canoes. (2) family 1920] Makah Indians 13 and transportation canoes. (3) voyaging canoes, and (1) war canoes. Swan*^ groups the canoes of the Makah into four classes. The spelling and accent of the native terms for these ratings differ on different pages of this work. They are as follows : (1) The whaling canoe, pa-dau-t'hl (p. 21), pah-dow-tlil (p. 95); (2) the canoe for six persons, bo-kwis-tat (p. 21), bo-kwis-tat (p. 95); (3) a smaller canoe, a-tlis-tat (p. 21), ar-tlls-tat (p. 95); (4) a very small canoe used for fisliing. ta-ka-aii-da (p. 21), ta-kaow-dah (p. 95). XoTE. — Swan's pa-dau-t'lil is probably pada'wiL.^outfit. or equipment. The term in-obably refers to the equipment of floats, lines, tow-ropes, and harpoons, witli which the wlialing canoe is laden. His term for the second type, bo-kwis-tat. is ex- plained by my informant as bu-kyi'st, bu = four, kyist = inside. It would seem to be properly a descriptive expression for canoes carrying four persons, not six. His term a-tlis-tat, I cannot identify. His term for the "very small canoe," "te-ka-au-da. is apparently tek'eodi'yak (:=; in the middle one sits). The craft was so small that one could not sit in the stern without capsizing. Curtis mentions two sorts of canoes, the whaling canoe, "oo'talisets." and the war canoe, "wi-tuk-ests." According to my informant there are seven "ratings " as follows: The "freight" canoe, ci'tLats. This craft is the largest made. Such canoes are employed when people are moving their effects from one locality to another. In some cases even the house timbers are loaded into the canoe, or towed along beliind. Occasionally two or three canoes are lashed side by side, and the house planks laid across them to make a platform, spaces being left between the planks to accommodate the paddlers. The Makah do not often resort to this device. If a squall comes up the lashings liave to be cast off. or the canoes soon fill. The "war" canoe. witA'ksAts (tAkwi'dak — war). This is given bv' Curtis (\'ol. II. p. 179) as wi-tuk-csts. The craft is also known as the tLe'iks (^expe- dition, or errand, boat). It is somewhat smaller than the preceding, and has much less width of beam, in proportion to its length. It is used in warfare, for making ceremonial visits, in connection with marriages and feasts, and is employed for all extended trips. Canoes of this kind combine seaworthiness witli speed, but could not carry much cargo without great inconvenience. The "whaling" canoe. The bottom of tliis craft is 1' o "stretches ' of the builder's arms in length. The "three people" canoe, atLA'kwodiyak. This term is said to be descriptive of the position of the men in the canoe, namely, two men forward, paddling, witli a steersman in tlie sternsheets. The "sealing" canoe. y£'cabA(|Ats ("for two men"). In pursuing the seal, one man paddled while the other planted himself in tlie bow witli tlie liarpoon in readi- ness. This general method is the one employed by civilized sealers at the present, each boat carrying a "boat-puller," and a "hunter, " the latter with a rifle. The sealing canoe is carefully designed so tiiat it does not splash the water as it sur- mounts the waves. It carries a "knife-blade " at each end. whicli cuts tin- water (see » 1870. pp. 21. (1.-.. 14 Waterman [Vol. 1 below page 19. The seal are very alert and a boat which squatters over the swells causes them to take alarm. This canoe measures along the bottom 3l/o "stretches" of the arms, from tip to tip of the fingers. The "one man" canoe, tck'eodi'yak (^in the middle one sits). This is men- tioned in the note above. It accomodates one person only. The "children's canoe," hupi'dwwac (, he-tuk-wad, hey-tuks-wad). B. kaqai'yuwaxs (Swan, loc.cit ka-kai-woks, hah-hai-xcohs). tc'eL-'kduwAxs (Swan, loc.cit. cha-t'hluk-dos, chah,-thlik-do-as). liitA'ksistAxs (=inside place), ll.'i'tca (=stern). ADDITIONAL NOTES ON THE HULL Boxc and Stern Pieces When the canoe is small, the whole hull is carved from one piece. In the craft of greater size, large additional pieces, called in general si'kwAb="sitting jjieccs" (