^. * ^ V •:,•*- <^ a: V * * • °- ^ ^^^ ,0 o V '• ^^"^^ -j^p-/ /\ '^^P-' /"% '--M k vk • ^ °o o V ~r^-^ / S 3?» E E C H OF HON. DANIEL E. SICKLES, OF N. Y., ON THE STATE OF THE UNION, DELIVERED IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, DEC. 10, 18G0, The motion to excuse Hon. Mr. Hawkins, of Florida, from serving on the Committee of one from each State, to which was referred so much of the President's Message as relates to the secession of States from the Union. Mr. SICKLES said : Mr. (Speaker : I will not be gviilty of the presumptiou of supposing that auylhiiig that I can say b_y Tray of appeal to the gentleman from Florida will change his deliberate determination, or that anything I can address personally to the House will influence the vote upon this question ; but I have believed, as my distinguished colleague [Mr. John Cochrane] thought the other day, that the gentleman from Florida, and the members, at least upon this side of the House, would listen to an appeal in the name oFithe city of New York ; and it is only, sir, as a Representative of that city, in the hope of giving expression to something of the deep and universal solicitude whi^n pervades the heart of that metropolis in this great crisis, that I would venture for a moment to claim the attention of the House. The Constitution under which we live was inaugurated in that city from the lips of Washington. One of the earliest votes it gave was for Thomas Jefferson ; and the vote of that city decided the election of Mr. Jefferson, and therein the foundation of the Democratic party. It sustained, throughout, the administra- tion of Madison. When treason lifted its head in other places, no voice but the voice of patriotism and loyalty was heard to pass the borders of the city. It sustained the administration of Jackson through all the struggles, throughout all the grave controversies which then imperiled the Union of these States. Not to speak of later and magnificent proofs of its devotion to constitutional states- men and policy, the city has never given a vote that has looked to one section in disparagement of another. Every instinct, every thought, every purpose of the city of New York is, as its record proves, national, patriotic, American. It is in the name, then, of such a people, with such a past, that I would venture " / . .$?«-•■. to appeal to men on all sides of this Chamber for that moderation, that devotion to duty, yes, even for the self-sacrifices, which are necessary in this crisis. Mr. Speaker, one of the great dangers of the day is that the country has not uuderstood, and does not understand, the extent of the peril in which it is placed. Illusions have usurped the place of reason in the popular mind. These illusions beguile us for the moment, only to plunge us into graver situations. Does any man on this floor suppose, that if, in the mouth of October, the masses of the North could have realized what they now see to be the sad truth, we would stand noiv where we are, on the verge of dissolution ? No man who knows the Ameri- can people has the credulity to believe that. The country has been fatally de- ceived, and some of these illusions possess us even now. One of them is that this Union can be preserved by force ; men believe that although we may be at the moment menaced by disunion, and although incipient movements toward it may be attempted without interference, and may be, perhaps, brought to the very verge of consummation without opposition, yet at last the strong arm of power will interpose and stay the work. I, for one, Mr. Speaker, have never for a moment entertained such a thought. It is not the opinion of the people whom I represent; and I must say to you, in all solemnity, that while the city of New York will cling to the Union to the last; while we will look on the last hour of its existence as we would upon the setting sun if we were never to see it more; yet when the call for force comes — let it come whence it may — no man will ever pass the boundaries ot the city of New York for tlie purposo of waging war against any State of this Union, which, through its constituted authorities, and sustained by the voice of its people, solemnly declares that its rights, its interests, and its honor, demand that it should seek safety in a separate existence. I mean by that, sir, not to class myself among those who do not love the Union, for it has no more loyal citizens than those of the city of New York, for whom I undertake to speak to- day. I only mean to discharge my duty in endeavoring to contribute something towards dispelling the hallucination that exists in many places — yes, sir, in distinguished places — that the Union is to be preserved by armies. The Union can be made perpetual by justice — it cannot be maintained an instant by force. If these truths had been graven deep in the hearts of the people, North, East, and West, and Jiad led to the conscientious recognition of constitutional obligations, all would have been well ; and until these truths are recognized throughout the laud we cannot have peace. Jefferson said, "every State must judge for itself of the infraction of the com- pact, and of the mode and measure of redress." His authority should be poten- tial with the Republicans, for they profess a pharasaical sort of respect for his opinions. But it is said that secession is revolution. Be it so. If it be a mode of revolutionary retaliation, it is not the less true that the revolutionary initiative has preceded secession, in the le2:islation and policy of the dominant party in the Northern States. Secession is the consequence, not the cause, of a condition of lifairs which has made a longer adhesion to the Union incompatible with the welfare of some of its members. This conflict has been produced by the deter- 3 J, mination of the majority to use its power, ac(iuircrl within the forms of the Con- stitution, for purposes subversive of its substance. The fatal decree luis ^'onc forth that the riouth is forever excluded from the Territories. How nmch the South loses or the North gains — whether it is a practical or au abstract grievance, are themes past discussion ; I will only affirm of it that it is tlie overthrow of the Constitution by the mere arbitrary will of the majority. If the majurity will signalize its control of the government by aggression, the minority will not suiTer the usurpation to become a precedent by submission. The fundamental idea of the Constitution is the equality of the States and the equal rights of the citizens thereof, one with the other, in the Union and in all its possessions, privileges, and advantages. When this principle no longer controls the government, rcvo- lution has already done its work. And it is then a question for each State to decide for itself, in view of all its obligations to civilization and to the opinion ot mankind, whether it will linger in the Union and endeavor to restore the equili- brium, or whether its interests will be better promoted out of the Union. What is secession? It is the act of a sovereign State, declaring its indepen.l- ence, consummated by its citizens acting through their duly constituted authorities. It is not nullification, nor insurrection, nor sedition, nor invasion, nor is it the act of a mob. It is the act of sovereignty. It is not, therefore, an act against which the Federal Government may employ any of the force with which it is invented by the Constitution for the maintenance of peace and tranquillity within the Union. It follows, then, that to exert the military and naval power of the remaining States against a State which has renounced the Union, is a declaration of war. To what cud shall we make war against a State which has been a member of the Union ? Surely it could not be expected that the most successful prosecution of hostilities would promote the reconstruction of the Confederacy, or persuade the seceding State to return. Shall we seek to subdue it, and hold it as a mere ter- ritory, by conquest '{ This Avould be repugnant to the theory of our Government, which has never acquired territory without compensation, nor compelled the allegiance of independent States against their consent. It is equally in conflict with the principle, now generally recognized in Europe, acknowledging the right of States to determine by universal suff"rage, not only their form of government, but the transfer of their allegiance from one authority to another. This principle has been illustrated by contemporaneous events in France, Tuscany, ^lodeua, Farma, Naples, Lombardy, Sardinia, Savoy, and Nice. And it has been formally recognized by Great Britain. If the purpose of such a war be to destroy the power of the seceding State as a foreign enemy, let us at least wait for evidence of its antagonism. And if the object be to obtain a treaty of amity and inter- course, placing our citizens upon an equal footing with those of the most favored nations, all this would doubtless be conceded without war. We mu.~t not seek subjects where we should only look for allies. Secession is the last dread alternative of a free State when it ha^ to choose between liberty and injustice. In our Federal system the recognized right of secession is a conservative safeguard, it is the highest constitutional and moral guarantee against injustice; and therefore, if it had been always aud universally acknowledged as a rightful remedy, it would have eoutribu^ed more than all else to perpetuate the Union, by compelling the observance of all their obligations on the part of all the States. The opposite dogma, which is so extensively believed at the North, that no matter what wrongs a State may have to enduie, it may aud ought to be compelled by force to remain in the Union, even as a conquered dependency, is a most dangerous heresy, in our system of government, and has contributed largely to the existing anarchy. Another illusion, Mr. Speaker, is, that the responsibility of dealing with this crisis, aud that the power to deal with it, is in the South, This is not so. The southern people have their share of responsibility. Deep and heavy it is, I am sure ; and none are more sensible of it than tbey who carry the burden. I have no doubt they will act in full view of all their just responsibilities. But, sir, the southern Representatives on this floor cannot, if they would, no matter what personal sacrifices they may deem it their duty to make, arrest the movement which has already enlisted the support of the great masses of the southern people — certainly the greater part of the population of several important States, and sufficient to precipitate the most dreadful events upon us. I believe, the people of the city of New York believe, that the responsibility of dealing with the existing state of things, and the power to deal with it effectively, rest alone with the Republican leaders ; with those who have just achieved power in the Federal Government; with those who control the Legislatures of northern States. There the responsibility rests. The country will place it there; Europe and America will place it there; history will place it there. Whatever the conse- quence may be, in the judgment of history and in the estimation of posterity, they will be held responsible. I think the country will regard the absolute silence which the Republican leaders, with a few honored exceptions, have thus far preserved as at least contemptuous, if not reckless of the dearest interests of the nation. But that is a question for them to consider. When the pioneer sees the billows of flame rolling over the burning prairie, he does not waste the precious moments in a hopeless struggle against the intan- gible foe ; but he hastens to his cabin, and, gathering around him his femily, leads them to a place of security. So the South, when the cry of extermination against their institutions has reached their frontiers; when the slave already hears across the border the whispering emissary of insurrection, who has been suffered unrebuked to proclaim his infamous plots aloud in the streets and churches of the North ; now, when the family and fireside appeal for protection, is this a time to ask the representatives of southern States to abandon their measures of self-defense, and resume the weary task of persuading the dema- gogues and the fanatics of other States to undo the irreparable wrong which has been committed ? No, no. Let the representatives of the aggressive States, at the other end of the Capitol, and here, speak to their people. Let the Legisla- tures of the northern States be convened, aud let them act. Let the sealed lips 6 ^J^ of the Medusa head at Springfield be opened, and send back to tlicir caverns the ma 1 winds which are driving our good ship of Sfatc to destruction. Again, I s^}', those who arc resp )nsible in this crisis must not be allowed to hide themselves nor to shrink from their duty We mu-t keep steadily in vi< w tho^c with whom the power rests to rescue the country from its peril; and therefore I do not concur in some of the criticisms which have been made upon the organization of this committee. I would be pleased to see the honorable gentleman from Ohio who last addressed the House [Mr. A''allandigiiam] upon the committee. I would be pleased to see the distinguished gentleman from Illinois [Mr. McCler- nand] likewise upon the committee. My constituents would have been glad to be assured of their knowledge, their assiduity, tlieir {latriotism, in the councils of that committee; but these gentlemen, unfortunately, arc not in a position to speak for the Legislatures of Ohio and Illinois; and I think it was wise, I think it was eminently proper and just in the Speaker, to place upon that committee leading members of the dominant party of this House and of the couniry; and especially was it right to place upon that committee, from each State, men iden- tified with the party that controls the legislation of tie State. So far as this has been done by the Speaker, I am prepared to commend his action in the dis- charge of his difficult and delicate duty. It is suggested to me, as a cheering sign, that none of the gentlemen on the Republican side of the chamber have asked to be excused from service on this committee. It is regarded as an evidence that they are vrilHog to meet the issue ; that they are prepared to deal with the questions of the day one way or 'the other; that they are prepared to confer with their people at home, and see if there be such assurance of concession as will be ju.st to the South and will enable us to go on together as one people ; or whether, on the other hand, it is impos.'-ible to preserve peace between the sections; that there is no hope left for the Confed- eracy; that the party controlling the legislation of the northern States is willing to take the responsibility, before God and the country, of breaking up the Gov- ernment rather than tolerate slavery within the Union. I am glad, therefore, that these gentlemen have been placed upon this committee. If I were to allow myself to make any criticism upon the composition of the committee, it would be the expression of a regret that gentlemen even more prominent — more ultra, if you will; more closely identified with the real life and strengtli of the llepubli- can party — were not placed upon ir. 1 would like to see in this House, and in the Senate, committees composed largely of men who are authorized to speak for the Kepublican party ; of men who are intimate in the councils of the President elect; of men whose voice is potential in the Legislatures of their respective States; and then, if they are willing to bring before this Congress a report recommending measures which gentlemen from the South can accept, and go home to their constituents and ask them to accept, there is some prospect, at least some possibility, of emerging from this crisis with dignity, with success, and with honor. Otherwise there is none. The sad question that we will have alone to consider then will be, laow to terminate, or liow to reconstruct this work which was so gloriously begun, and which has been, thus far, so successfully conducted. Mr. Speaker, T hear a great deal said of propositions to amend the Constitu- tion. I trust that there may be some reason to expect justice and conciliation through that channel. But, sir, I have a deep distrust of the capacity of this generation, and especially of any of the men of the Republican party, from whom the denunciations of the present Constitution have come, to make a Constitution that shall succeed where the genius, the wisdom, and the patriotism of Wash- ington and Madison and Hamilton failed. What is the real cause of our present trouble ? It is a disregard of the obligations of our Constitution. Obey the Con- stitution we have, cherish it, cleave to it as an article of faith, and you will have peace again. If that had been done always, this calamity never would have come upon us. But if there be not enough of conscience among the people to obey the Constitution made sacred by the ini . S • • » /-w <>> . t • ,*^ -\ ♦ AT ^ • "V^^V' "V^^^^/^ "V^'^V^ \'''* IIP/ 'V ^ - '^/;,c^/%^ ^c°\.^7-o^ /.^^^y% /.'%