LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. Shelf-/-/' UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. >^r^ ^^^;^^^^ PERSONAL TRAITS OF B A RITISH AUTHORS Byron-Shelley— Moore-Rogers Keats-Southey— Landor EDITED BY V EDWARD T. MASON WITH PORTRAITS^* \m 22 1885 ^ 16 2 Oi. /^ NEW YORK CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS 1885 h3 3 Copyright, 1884, by CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS TROWS PRmriNG VND BOOKBINDING COMPANY; NEW YORK. M. Y. AND L. H. Y. THESE VOLUMES ARE GRATEFULLY INSCRIBED. ' Let those who are in favour with their stars, Of publick honour and proud titles boast, Whilst I, whom fortune of such triumph bars, Unlook'd for joy in that I honour most. Great princes' favourites their fair leaves spread But as the marigold at the sun's eye, And in themselves their pride lies buried. For at a frown they in their glory die. The painful warrior famoused for fight, After a thousand victories, once foiled, Is from the book of honour razed quite, And all the rest forgot for which he toil'd ; Then happy I, that love and am belov'd, Where I may not remove, nor be remov'd." CONTENTS. PAGE Preface, . . . vii Chronology, i Lord Byron, 3 Percy Bysshe Shelley, ,...,,. 73 Thomas Moore, 141 Samuel Rogers, 167 John Keats, 193 Robert Southey, . . . . . . . , 209 Walter Savage Landor, 249 List of Authorities, . . . . „ . . 305 PREFACE. NEARLY one hundred years ago, while revolu- tion was teaching its stern lessons in France, English literature shook off the torpor in which it had lain so long, and awoke to a new life, a life of power and of beauty. To that great awakening may be traced everything of real moment and significance which has since distinguished the literature of Eng- land. Now the forces of that time seem well-nigh spent, and no fresh impulse has come. One by one the lights have gone out ; their places are unfilled. Standing to-day at the close of a brilliant period, we have the means of estimating that period with intelligence, and of gaining adequate knowledge of the men who made it illustrious — knowledge not only of their works, but of themselves. As a con- tribution to this study, the present series of books has been prepared. The aim of these volumes is to describe and illus- trate the personal characteristics of twenty-seven VI 11 PREFACE, authors, who have been chosen as fairly representa- tive of their period. Careful search has been made for everything which might throw light upon these authors ; upon their appearance, habits, manners ; upon their talk, their work and their play, their strength and weakness — physical, mental, moral. Records of acts directly exemplifying traits of char- acter have been given, whenever it was possible, in preference to mere expressions of individual opin- ion. Any testimony other than that of eye-witness- es has been admitted with reluctance. A strictly chronological arrangement was impracticable, as the authors all belong to the same general period. They have, therefore, been distributed into such groups as were suggested by the likeness or unlikeness which the men bore to one another ; an arrange- ment according either to affinity or to contrast. Although the search for materials has been care- fully made, it is by no means exhaustive. Never- theless, the hope is entertained that nothing of vital importance has been overlooked.' The materials have been found abundant, bewilderingly so, as may be inferred from the fact that the contents of these volumes have been drawn from over two hundred different sources. ^ The editor will be very thankful for any suggestion of other sources of information which may occur to readers of this book. PRE FA CE. IX The method chosen by the editor has been criti- cised by friends, who think that it would have been better to embody the results of investigation in a continuous narrative, thus avoiding the harsh tran- sitions of style and the literary awkwardness of a mere compilation. While recognizing the force of these criticisms, the editor is quite confident that his original design is better fitted to accomplish the purpose of his work. Accordingly, the several wit- nesses are permitted to tell their stories each in his own way. Nothing which directly serv^ed the end in view has been excluded because it happened to be written in bad English. On the witness-stand the testimony of the untaught peasant is often quite as valuable as that of the bard or the sage ; and so it happens that some strange and unpleasing con- trasts will be found in these pages ; for here the skilful and the clumsy stand side by side. The graceful and musical diction of De Quincey may be followed by the shabby finery of Willis, and the reader may be led from Carlyle's rugged force, or the dreamlike beauty of Hawthorne, to the flippancy of some obscure literary hack. The present volume is devoted to seven authors, whose lives and characters present a range of hu- manity varying widely in purpose, in experience, and in achievement. The leading events of their lives have been embodied in brief chronological PRE FA CE. tables. It is hoped that the dates are fairly accu- rate, as they have been derived from original author- ities. The bibliographical information presented in the introductory notes is not meant to be exhaustive, but merely suggestive — "book openeth book." In addition to this, the reader's attention is called to the fourth volume of T. H. Ward's "English Poets" (Macmillan & Co., London and New York, 1880). This volume contains admirable notices of the mod- ern English poets, estimates of their personal char- acters as well as of their literary works. The authors under present consideration are noted as follows: Byron, by J. A. Symonds; Shelley, by F. W. H. Myers ; Moore, by E. W. Gosse ; Rogers and South- ey, by Sir Henry Taylor ; Keats, by Matthew Arnold ; Landor, by Lord Houghton. Extracts have been made from the following American copyrighted books : Mrs. Kemble's " Rec- ords of Later Life " (Henry Holt & Co., New York, 1882) ; James T. Fields' "Old Acquaintance : Barry Cornwall and Some of his Friends " (J. R. Osgood & Co., Boston, 1876) ; Dr. R. Shelton Mackenzie's edition of "Noctes Ambrosianae," 5 vols. (New York, 1854); N. P. Willis' "Pencillings by the Way" (Charles Scribner, New York, 1853) ; The Atlantic Monthly (Houghton, Mifflin & Co., Boston) ; Lippin- cotfs Magazine (J. B. Lippincott & Co., Philadel- phia). Permission was kindly granted to make PREFA CE. XI selections from these works, and the courtesy of their respective owners is thankfully acknowl- edged. Among books of reference which have been espe- cially useful, the Catalogue of the Brooklyn Library holds the foremost place. This admirable work has been found an intelligent and trustworthy guide, and it is a pleasure once more to call attention to its excellence. It is certainly one of the most valu- able helps which a literary worker can possess. The editor would also express his sense of personal ob- ligation to Mr. S. B. Noyes, of the Brooklyn Library, for favors conferred, with unwearied kindness, at every stage in the preparation of these volumes. CHRONOLOGY. Bom. Died. 1763. Rogers. 1^55- 1774. SOUTHEY. 1843. 1775- Landor. 1864. 1779. Moore. 1852. 1788. Byron. 1824. 1792. Shelley. 1822. 1795- Keats. 1821. GEORGE GORDON NOEL, 6th Lord Byron. 1788-1824. INTRODUCTORY NOTE. IN a letter to his sisters, Macaulay says,' ''The worst thing that I know about Lord Byron is the very unfavorable impression which he made on men who certainly were not inclined to judge him harshly, and who, as far as I know, were never per- sonally ill-used by him. Sharp and Rogers both speak of him as an unpleasant, affected, splenetic person. I have heard hundreds and thousands of people who never saw him, rant about him ; but I never heard a single expression of fondness for him fall from the lips of any of those who knew him well." On the other hand, some of the men who knew him intimately left records which emphati- cally express admiration and affection for the man, as may be seen by consulting pp. 68-71 of this volume. There is, perhaps, no character among British au- thors so hard to understand, or as to which there is so wide a difference of opinion. Contradiction and perplexity abound in every account of his life. The ^ Trevelyan (George Otto). Life and Letters of Lord Macau- lay. 2 vols, 8vo. London, 1876. LORD BYRON, Student is confused and baffled by the conflicting testimony of witnesses who have equal claims to his belief. The versatility of Byron, remarkable as it was, does not account for this ; the explanation is that, consciously or unconsciously, he was generally acting, playing a part, posing in some attitude which he thought becoming. His nature was mor- bid in many ways, but in none more notably than in his utter want of simplicity ; he was thoroughly artificial. Among the many sources of information, the fol- lowing works deserve particular attention : Moore's and Gait's "Lives of Byron;" Leigh Hunt's ''Lord Byron and Some of his Contemporaries ;" Trelawny's " Recollections of the Last Days of Shelley and By- ron " (republished, with alterations and additions, as " Records of Shelley, Byron, and the Author ") ; Ju- lius Millingen's " Memoirs of the Affairs of Greece ;" Karl Elze's "Life of Byron;" A. G. L'Estrange's "Life of the Rev. W. Harness;" the Countess of Blessington's " Conversations of Lord Byron," and the same writer's " Idler in Italy ; " Rev. F. Hodg- son's "Memoirs;" and a series of letters relating to Lord and Lady Byron, published in the AthencBimi^ August 1 8, 1883. Leigh Hunt was Byron's severest critic. The book in which he recorded his impressions of his former friend and patron was bitterly abused, and he was himself rebuked, in no measured terms, for having written it. Undoubtedly it was written in great bitterness of heart, and therefore its statements must be received with some caution. But Hunt had an excellent reputation for honesty of purpose LORD BYRON. and for kindly feeling, a reputation generally ac- corded to him by those who were in a position to judge fairly, and this fact must also be borne in mind. In his autobiography, written in his old age, he reviews this youthful work in a calm, dispassion- ate manner, regretfully, indeed, but without retract- ing any of his former statements of fact. On the contrary, he protests that he said nothing untrue ; and as the charges have not been refuted by any competent authority, they cannot be dismissed. The most satisfactory work upon Byron's life is that of Karl Elze. The original work was published in Germany, in 1870 ; and in 1872 it was translated into English, and published by John Murray (Lon- don). A new edition has recently been published, containing additional matter (Berlin : Oppenheim, 1881) ; but I have not heard of a translation of this. Professor Elze's tenth chapter, ''Characteristics," is an admirable summary of the widely opposed views of Byron's life and character, in which the statements of the various authorities are clearly presented. Among the smaller books, designed for popular cir- culation, the best is Mr. John Nichol's volume in the "English Men of Letters " series ; the book is pleasantly written, and is quite free from partisan- ship of any kind. The latest contribution, " The Real Lord Byron," by John Cordy Jeafferson, does not add materially to the sum of previous knowledge of the subject. LEADING EVENTS OF BYRON'S LIFE. 1788. Bom, January 22d, in London. i8oi. — (Aged 13.) A scholar at Harrow. 1805. — (Aged 17.) Enters Cambridge University. 1806. — (Aged 18.) Publishes a volume of poems, which he almost immediately suppresses. 1807. — (Aged 19.) Publishes "Hours of Idleness." 1809.— (Aged 21.) Publishes "English Bards and Scotch Re- viewers." Takes his seat in Parliament. Goes abroad. 181 1. — (Aged 23.) Returns to England. 1812. — (Aged 24.) Publishes the first and second cantos of " Childe Harold's Pilgrimage."^ 1813.— (Aged 25.) Publishes "The Bride of Abydos." 1814,— (Aged 26.) Publishes "The Corsair." 1815. — (Aged 27.) Marries Miss Milbanke, January 2d. 1816. — (Aged 28.) His wife leaves him in January ; he leaves Eng- land in April. Meets Shelley, Mary W. Godwin, and Jane Clairmont, at Geneva, in May.* 1817. — (Aged 29.) Publishes "Manfred." 1818.— (Aged 30.) Publishes "Beppo." 1819.— (Aged 31.) Publishes the first part of " Don Juan." 1820. — (Aged 32.) Publishes " Marino Faliero. " 1821. — (Aged 33.) Publishes "The Two Foscari," " Sardanapa- lus," and "Cain." 1822. — (Aged 34.) Engaged upon TAe Liberal^ with Leigh Hunt. Publishes "The Deformed Transformed," "Werner," and the concluding cantos of " Don Juan." 1823. — (Aged 35.) Sails for Greece, July 14th. 1824. — (Aged 36 years, 2 months.) Dies, in Greece, April 19th. * From this year, 1816, until his departure for Greece, Byron lived upon the continent, for the greater part of the time in Italy. He never returned to Eng- land. J BYRON. THAT, as a child, his temper was violent, or rather sullenly passionate, is certain. Even when in petticoats he showed the same uncontrol- lable spirit Avith his nurse which he afterwards ex- hibited, when an author, with his critics. Being angrily reprimanded by her one day for having soiled or torn a new frock in which he had been just dressed, he got into one of his " silent rages " (as he himself has described them), seized the frock with both his hands, rent it from top to bottom, and stood in sullen stillness, setting his censurer and her wrath at Byron")/ defiance. — Thomas Moore (" Life of The malformation of his foot was, even at this childish age,^ a subject on which he showed pecu- liar sensitiveness. I have been told by a gentleman of Glasgow, that the person who nursed his wife, and who still lives in his family, used often to join ' Moore (Thomas). Letters and Journals of Lord Byron, with Notices of his Life. 2 vols, 4to. London, 1830. When eight years old. Temper in childhood. Sensitive- ness about his deforin- ity. 10 BYRON, Sensitive- ness abotit his cieforin- ity. School-n/e. P r efe r s g00d'/cll07V- ship to scholarship. the nurse of Byron when they were out with their respective charges, and one day said to her as they walked together, " What a pretty boy Byron is ! What a pity he has such a leg ! " On hearing this allusion to his infirmity, the child's eyes flashed with anger, and striking at her with a little whip which he held in his hand, he exclaimed impatiently, '' Dinna speak of it ! " Sometimes, however, as in after-life, he could talk indifferently, and even jestingly, of this lameness ; and there being another little boy in the neighborhood who had a similar defect in one of his feet, Byron would say, laughingly, " Come and see the twa laddies with the twa club feet going up the Broad-street." '— T. Moore ("Life of Byron"). At school I was . . . remarked for the extent and readiness of my general information ; but in all other respects idle, capable of great sudden ex- ertions (such as thirty or forty Greek hexameters, of course with such prosody as pleased God), but of few continuous drudgeries. My qualities were much more oratorical and martial than poetical. . . . No one had the least notion that I should subside into poesy. — Lord Byron (quoted in Moore's "Life of Byron"). Of his class-fellows at the grammar-school there are many . . . still alive, by whom he is well re- membered ; and the general impression they retain of him is, that he was a lively, warm-hearted, and high-spirited boy — passionate and resentful, but ^ See also pp. 23, 24. BYRON. II affectionate and companionable with his school- fellows — and to a remarkable degree venturous and fearless, and (as one of them significantly expressed it) "always more ready to give a blow than to take one." . . . He was, indeed, much more anxious to distinguish himself among his school-fellows by prowess in all sports and exercises, than by ad- vancement in learning. Though quick, when he could be persuaded to attend, or had any study that pleased him, he was in general very low in the class, nor seemed ambitious of being promoted any higher. — T. Moore ('^Life of Byron "). While Lord Byron and Mr. Peel were at Harrow together, a tyrant some few years older . . . claimicd a right to fag little Peel, which claim (whether rightly or wrongly I know not) Peel re- sisted. His resistance, however, was in vain ; not only subdued him, but determined also to pun- ish the refractory slave ; and proceeded forthwith to put this determination in practice, by inflicting a kind of bastinado on the inner fleshy side of the boy's arm, which, during the operation, was twisted around with some degree of technical skill, to ren- der the pain more acute. While the stripes were suc- ceeding each other, and poor Peel writhing under them, Byron saw and felt for the misery of his friend ; and although he knew that he was not strong enough to fight , w^ith any hope of success, and that it was dangerous even to approach him, he advanced to the scene of action, and with a blush of rage, tears in his eyes, and a voice trem- bling between terror and indignation, asked very Pr efe r s good-felloiv- ship to scholarship. A generous attempt to shield a school-mate. 12 BYRON'. A generous attempt to shield a school-mate. Bashfulness hi youth. humbly if would be pleased to tell him, *' how many stripes he meant to inflict" "Why," returned the executioner, ^'you little rascal, what is that to you ? " '' Because, if you please," said Byron, " I would take half."— T. Moore ('' Life of Byron"). One of the most intimate and valued of his friends, at this period,^ has given me this account of her first acquaintance with him : " The first time I was in- troduced to him was at a party at his mother's, when he was so shy that she was forced to send for him three times before she could persuade him to come into the drawing-room, to play with the young peo- ple at a round game. He was then a fat, bashful boy, with his hair combed straight over his forehead . . . The next morning Mrs. Byron brought him to call at our house, when he still continued shy and formal in his manner. The conversation turned upon Cheltenham, where we had been staying, the amusements there, the plays, etc. ; and I mentioned that I had seen the character of Gabriel Lackbrain very well performed. His mother getting up to go, he accompanied her, making a formal bow, and I, in allusion to the play, said, * Goodby, Gaby.' His countenance lighted up, his handsome mouth dis- played a broad grin, all his shyness vanished, never to return, and upon his mother's saying ' Come, Byron, are you ready ?' — no, she might go by her- self, he would stay and talk a little longer ; and from that moment he used to come in and go out at all hours, as it pleased him, and in our house consid- When he was about sixteen years old. BYRON. 13 ered himself perfectly at home.": — T. Moore ("Life of Byron "). Lord Byron's face was handsome ; eminently so in some respects. He had a mouth and chin fit for Apollo ; and when I first knew him, there were both lightness and energy all over his aspect. But his countenance did not improve with age, and there were always some defects in it. The jaw was too big for the upper part. It had all the wilfulness of a despot in it. The animal predominated over the intellectual part of his head, inasmuch as the face altogether was large in proportion to the skull. The eyes also were set too near one another ; and the nose, though handsome in itself, had the appear- ance, when you saw it closely in front, of being grafted on the face, rather than growing properly out of it. His person was very handsome, though terminating in lameness, and tending to fat and effeminacy ; which makes me remember what a hos- tile fair one objected to him, namely, that he had little beard. . . . His lameness was only in one foot, the left ; and it was so little visible to casual notice, that as he lounged about a room (which he did in such a manner as to screen it) it was hardly perceivable. But it vv^as a real and even a sore lame- ness. Much walking upon it fevered and hurt it. It was a shrunken foot, a little twisted. — Leigh Hunt ("Lord Byron and Some of his Contemporaries ")/ ' Hunt (James Henry Leigh). Lord Byron and Some of his Contemporaries, with Recollections of the Author's Life. 2 vols, 8vo. London, 1828. Bashfuhtess iit youth. Personal appearance. 14 BYRON. Personal appearance. AJirstsight of Byron. His head was remarkably small, so much so as to be rather out of proportion with his face. The forehead, though a little too narrow, was high, and j appeared more so from his having his hair (to pre- j serve it, he said) shaved over the temples ; w^hile the I glossy, dark brown curls, clustering over his head, gave the finish to its beauty. When to this is added that his nose, though handsomely, was rather thickly shaped, that his teeth were white and regular, and his complexion colorless, as good an idea, perhaps, as it is the power of mere words to convey may be conceived of his features. — T. Moore (" Life of Byron "). Genoa, April i, 1823. — Saw Lord Byron for the first time. The impression of the first few moments disappointed me, as I had, both from the portraits and descriptions given, conceived a different idea of him. I had fancied him taller, with a more dignified and commanding air ; and I looked in vain for the hero-looking sort of person with whom I had so long identified him in imagination. His appearance is, however, highly prepossessing ; his head is finely shaped, and the forehead open, high, and noble ; his eyes are gray and full of expression, but one is visibly larger than the other ; the nose is large and well shaped, but from being a little too thick, it looks better in profile than in front-face ; his mouth is the most remarkable feature in his face, the upper lip of Grecian shortness, and the corners descending ; the lips full and finely cut. In speak- ing, he shows his teeth very much, and they are white and even ; but I observed that even in his byron: smile — and he smiles frequently— there is something of a scornful expression in his mouth that is evi- dently natural, and not, as many suppose, affected. This particularly struck me. His chin is large and well shaped, and finishes well the oval of his face. He is extremely thin, indeed so much so that his figure has almost a boyish air ; ^ his face is peculiarly pale, but not the paleness of ill-health, as its char- acter is that of fairness, the fairness of a dark-haired person — and his hair (which is getting rapidly gray) is of a very dark brown, and curls naturally ; he uses a good deal of oil in it, which makes it look still darker. His countenance is full of expression, and changes with the subject of conversation ; it gains on the beholder the more it is seen, and leaves an agreeable impression. I should say that melan- choly was its prevailing character, as I observed that when any observation elicited a smile — and they were many, as the conversation was gay and playful — it appeared to linger but for a moment on his lip, which instantly resumed its former expres- sion of seriousness. His whole appearance is remarkably gentleman- like, and he owes nothing of this to his toilet, as his coat appears to have been many years made, is much too large — and all his garments convey the idea of having been purchased ready-made, so ill do they fit him. There is a gaucherie in his move- ' In writing of a meeting with Byron, which occurred about two years before the date of the Countess of Blessington's description, Leigh Hunt says, '* Upon seeing Lord Byron, I hardly knew him, he was grown so fat." Byron's precautionary measures during these two years must have been remarkably successful. AJirstsighi of Byron. i6 BYRON, AJirst sight of Byron. Captain Treiwrnfiy^s impressions. ments, which evidently proceeds from the perpetual consciousness of his lameness, that appears to haunt him ; for he tries to conceal his foot when seated, and when walking has a nervous rapidity in his manner. He is very slightly lame, and the de- formity of his foot is so little remarkable that I am not now aware which foot it is/ — Countess of Blessington C' Conversations of Lord Byron ").'^ In external appearance Byron realized that ideal standard with which imagination adorns genius. He was in the prime of life, thirty-five ; of middle height, five feet eight and a half inches ; regular features, without a stain or furrow on his pallid skin, his shoulders broad, chest open, body and limbs finely proportioned. His small finely-finished head and curly hair had an airy and graceful ap- pearance from the massiveness and length of his throat ; you saw his genius in his eyes and lips. In short Nature could do little more than she had done for him, both in outward form, and in the inward spirit ghe had given to animate it. . . . His lameness certainly helped to make him sceptical, ^ This description is substantially the same which the Countess gives in her "Idler in Italy," except that in that work she remarks that "his laugh is musical, but he rarely indulged in it during our interview ; and when he did, it was quickly followed by a graver aspect, as if he liked not this exhibition of hilarity." She also says, " His are the smallest male hands I ever saw ; finely shaped, delicately white " — with farther particulars concerning the beauty of his nails, which she likens to pink sea-shells, etc. 2 Blessington (Margaret P. G., Countess of). Conversations of Lord Byron. 8vo. London, 1850. BYRON. 17 cynical, and savage. There was no peculiarity in his dress, it was adapted to the climate ; ^ a tartan jacket braided, ... a blue velvet cap with a gold band, and very loose nankeen trowsers, strapped down so as to cover his feet; his throat was not bare as represented in drawings. — E. J. Trelawny (" Records of Shelley, Byron, etc."). ^ He had most beautiful eyes, well set in his head ; they were like a cat's, changing continually in color, now brown, now golden, then green, full of ever- varying expression. — E. J. Trelawny [Whitehall Review^ 1880). In a letter of Coleridge's to a friend, written April 10, 1816, he thus speaks of Byron : " If you had seen Lord Byron, you could scarcely disbe- lieve him. So beautiful a countenance I scarcely ever saw — his teeth so many stationary smiles, his eyes the open portals of the sun — things of light and for light — and his forehead so ample, and yet so flexible, passing from marble smoothness into a hundred w'reaths and lines and dimples correspondent to the feelings and sentiments he is uttering." — James Gillman ('^ Life of Cole- ridge").' 1 That of Italy. '^ Trelawny (Edward John). Records of Shelley, Byron, and the author. 2 vols., i2mo. London, 1878. (Published originally in 1858, with the title, Recollections of the Last Days of Shelley and Byron.) ^ Gillman (James). Life of S. T. Coleridge, vol. I. 8vo. London, 1838. ( Only one volume was published.') Captain Trela7vtiy'' s impressions. i8 BYRON, Personal appearance. Perhaps the beauty of his physiognomy has been more highly spoken of than it really merited. Its chief grace consisted, when he was in a gay humor, of a liveliness which gave a joyous meaning to every articulation of the muscles and features ; when he was less agreeably disposed, the expres- sion was morose to a very repulsive degree. — John Galt ("Life of Byron ").* A countenance, exquisitely modelled to the ex- pression of feeling and passion, and exhibiting the remarkable contrast of very dark hair and eyebrows, with light and expressive eyes, presented to the physiognomist the most interesting subject for the exercise of his art. The predominating expression was that of deep and habitual thought, which gave way to the most rapid play of features when he en- gaged in interesting discussion ; so that a brother poet compared them to the sculpture of a beautiful alabaster vase, only seen to perfection when lighted from within. The flashes of mirth, indignation, or satirical dislike, which frequently animated Lord Byron's countenance, might, during an evening's conversation, be mistaken by a stranger for its ha- bitual expression, so easily and so happily was it formed for them all ; but those who had an oppor- tunity of studying his features for a length of time, and upon various occasions, both of rest and emo- tion, will agree with us that their proper language was that of melancholy. — Sir Walter Scott {Quarterly Review^ October, 1816). Gait (John). Life of Lord Byron. i6mo. London, 1830. BYROy. 19 The absence of any description by the Countess Guiccioli of Byron's appearance calls for a word of explanation ; the countess wrote several descrip- tions, and she might reasonably be supposed to know how Byron looked ; her manner, however, fails to inspire confidence. She says: ''The Al- mighty has created beings of such harmonious and ideal beauty that they defy description or analysis. Such a one was Lord Byron. His wonderful beauty of expression . . . summed up in one magnifi- cent type the highest expression of every possible kind of beauty." And again she refers to " that kind of supernatural light which seemed to surround him like a halo." ^ In view of these observations, the failure to chronicle the lady's portrayal of her friend's " harmonious and ideal beauty " may per- haps be pardoned. His appearance on horseback was not advan- tageous, and he seemed aware of it, for he made many excuses for his dress and equestrian appoint- ments. His horse was literally covered with various trappings, in the way of cavessons, martingales, and Heaven knows how many other (to me) unknown inventions. The saddle was a la hussarde with holsters, in which he always carried pistols. His dress consisted of a nankeen jacket and trousers, which appeared to have shrunk from washing; the jacket embroidered in the same color, and with three rows of buttons ; the waist very short, the Personal apj>eara7ice. ^ Guiccioli (Teresa Gamba, Contessd). Recollections of Byron. 2 vols., 8vo. London, 1869. On horse- back. 20 BYRON. On horse- back. A timid rider. back very narrow, and the sleeves set in as they used to be ten or fifteen years before ; a black stock, very narrow ; a dark blue velvet cap with a shade, and a very rich gold band and large gold tassel at the crown ; nankeen gaiters, and a pair of blue spectacles, completed his costume, which was any- thing but becoming. This was his general dress of a morning for riding, but I have seen it changed for a green tartan plaid jacket. He did not ride well, which surprised us, as, from the frequent allusions to horsemanship in his works, we expected to find him almost a Nimrod. It was evident that he \i2,di pretensions on this point, though he certainly was what I should call a timid rider. When his horse made a false step, which was not unfrequent, he seemed discomposed ; and when we came to any bad part of the road, he immediately checked his course and walked his horse very slowly, though there really was nothing to make even a lady nervous. Finding that I could perfectly man- age (or what he called bully) a very highly dressed horse that I daily rode, he became extremely anx- ious to buy it ; asked me a thousand questions as to how I had acquired such a perfect command of it, etc. ... As I was by no means a bold rider, we were rather amused at observing Lord Byron's opin- ion of my courage.' — Countess of Blessington (" Conversations of Lord Byron "). ^ This account differs materially from Leigh Hunt's opinion of Byron's horsemanship ; Hunt says : " He was a good rider, grace- ful, and kept a firm seat." BYROJSf. 21 No defect existed in the formation of his limbs ; his slight infirmity was nothing but the result of weakness of one of his ankles. His habit of ever being on horseback had brought on the emaciation of his legs, as evinced by the post-mortem examina- tion ; besides which, the best proof of this has been lately given in an English newspaper much to the following effect : " Mrs. Wildman (the w4dow of the colonel who had bought Newstead) has lately given to the Naturalist Society of Nottingham several ob- jects which had belonged to Lord Byron, and among others his boot and shoe trees. These trees are about nine inches long, narrow, and generally of a symmetrical form. They were accompanied by the following statement of Mr. Swift, bootmaker, who worked for his lordship from 1805 to 1807. . . . 'William Swift, bootmaker at Southwell, Notting- hamshire, having had the honor of working for Lord Byron when residing at Southwell from 1805 to 1807, asserts that these were the trees upon which his lordship's boots and shoes were made, and that the last pair delivered was on May 10, 1807. He more- over affirms that his lordship had not a club foot, as has been said, but that both his feet were equally well formed, one, however, being an inch and a half shorter than the other. The defect was not in the foot, but in the ankle, which, being weak, caused the foot to turn out too much. To remedy this his lordship wore a very light and thin boot, which was tightly laced just under the sole, and, when a boy, he was made to wear a piece of iron with a joint at the ankle, which passed behind the leg and was tied behind the shoe. The calf of this leg was weaker Varyingtes- ti7nouy as to Ids lame- 22 BYRON. Varyingies- timofty as to his lame- ness. than the other, and it was the left leg. (Signed) William Swift.' " This, then, is the extent of the de- fect of which so much has been said, and which has been called a deformity. As to its being visible, all those who knew him assert that it was so little evi- dent that it was even impossible to discover in which of the feet or legs the fault existed. — Count- ess GuicciOLi C' Recollections of Byron"). The only blemish of his body . . . was the congenital malformation of his left foot and leg. The foot was deformed, and turned inwards, and the leg vv^as smaller and shorter than the sound one. Al- though Lord Byron preferred attributing his lame- ness to the unskilful treatment of a sprained ankle, there can be little or no doubt, that he was born club-footed. — Julius Millingen (''Memoirs of Af- fairs of Greece"). ^ . . . It was caused by the contraction of the back sinews, which the doctors call " Tendon Achil- lis," that prevented his heels resting on the ground, and compelled him to walk on the fore part of his feet ; except this defect, his feet were perfect. — E. J. Trelawny ("Records of Shelley, Byron, etc.," 1878). In 1858 Trelawny said, in his " Recollections of the Last Days of Shelley and Byron : " "Both Byron's feet were clubbed, and his legs withered to the knee — the form and features of an Apollo, with the feet and legs of a sylvan satyr." Here, as in so many other instances, it is almost impossible to discover ^ Millingen (Julius). Memoirs of the Affairs of Greece, with An- ecdotes of Lord Byron. i2mo. London, 1831. BYROA\ 21 the absolute truth about Byron. The latest student of his life, Mr. John Nichol/ after remarking upon the differences in the various accounts, says : " It is certain that one of the poet's feet was, either at birth or at a very early period, so seriously clubbed or twisted as to affect his gait, and to a considerable extent his habits. It also appears that the surgical means — boots, bandages, etc.' — adopted to straighten the limb, only aggravated the evil." In his attention to his person and dress, to the be- coming arrangement of his hair, and to whatever might best show off the beauty with which nature had gifted him, he manifested his anxiety to make himself pleasing to that sex, who were, from first to last, the ruling stars of his destiny. The fear of be- coming, what he was naturally inclined to be, enor- mously fat, had induced him, from his first entrance at Cambridge, to adopt, for the purpose of reducing him- self, a system of violent exercise and abstinence, to- getherwith the frequent use of warm baths. But the imbittering circumstance of his life . . . was, strange to say, the trifling deformity of his foot. B}^ that one slight blemish (as in his moments of melan- choly he persuaded himself) all the blessings that na- ture had showered upon him were counterbalanced. His reverend friend Mr. B., finding him one day un- usually dejected, endeavored to cheer and rouse him by representing, in their brightest colors, all the vari- ous advantages with which Providence had endowed ^ Nichol (John). Byron, i2mo. London and New York, i860. (English Men of Letters. Ed. by J. Morley.) Var\i7igtes- timony as ta his lame- ness. Regard for his personal aj>pearafice. 24 BYROA'. Regard for his personal nj'jfearance. Fo/>pish- 7iess, Effetninaie and inascu- lifie traits. him^and, among the greatest, that of "a mind which placed him above the rest of mankind." " Ah, my dear friend," said Byron mournfully, ''if this (laying his hand on his forehead) places me above the rest of mankind, that (pointing to his foot) places me far, far below them." — T. Moore (" Life of Byron"). 'Ho petit maitre could pay more sedulous attention than he did to external appearance, or consult with more complacency the looking-glass. Even when en neglige h.Q studied the na,ture of the postures he assumed as attentively as if he had been sitting for his picture ; and so much value did he attach to the whiteness of his hands, that, in order not to suffer " the winds of heaven to visit them too roughly," he constantly, and even within doors, wore gloves. — Julius Millingen ("Memoirs of Af- fairs of Greece"). He had a delicate white hand, of which he was proud ; and he attracted attention to it by rings. He thought a hand .of this description almost the only mark remaining nowadays of a gentleman. . . . . He often appeared holding a handker- chief, upon which his jewelled fingers lay im- bedded, as in a picture. He was fond of fine linen as a Quaker ; and had the remnant of his hair oiled and trimmed with all the anxiety of a Sarda- napalus. The visible character to which this effemi- nacy gave rise, appears to have indicated itself as early as his travels in the Levant, where the Grand Signior is said to have taken him for a woman. But BYRON. 25 he had tastes of a more masculine description. He was fond of swimming to the last, and used to push out to a good distance in the Gulf of Genoa. ^ — Leigh Hunt (" Lord Byron and his Contempo- raries"). Nothing gratifies him so much as being told that he grows thin. This fancy of his is pushed to an almost childish extent ; and he frequently asks, " Don't you think I get thinner ? " or " Did you ever see any person so thin as I am, who was not ill ? " He says he is sure no one could recollect him were he to go to England at present, and seems to enjoy this thought very much. — Countess of Blessington C Conversations of Lord Byron "). I frequently heard him say, " I especially dread, in this world, two things, to which I have reason to believe I am equally predisposed — growing fat and growing mad ; and it would be difficult for me to de- cide, were I forced to make a choice, which of these conditions I would choose in preference." To avoid corpulence, not satisfied with eating . . . spar- ingly, and renouncing the use of every kind of food that he deemed nourishing, he had recourse almost daily to strong drastic pills, . . . and if he observed the slightest increase in the size of his wrists or waist, which he measured with scrupulous exactness every morning, he immediately sought to reduce it by taking a large dose of Epsom salts, ^ Byron was also fond of boxing, and often tried his skill with Jackson, a professional pugilist. Effevitnate and vtasczi- line traits. Dread of carj>ulettce. 26 BYRON. Diet. Conflicting testimony as to his use of tobacco. Voice atid conversa- tion. Con7>ersa- tion. besides the usual pills. — Julius Millingen (" Me- moirs of Affairs of Greece "). His system of diet here ^ was regulated by an ab- stinence almost incredible. A thin slice of bread, with tea, at breakfast — a light, vegetable dinner, with a bottle or two of Seltzer water, tinged with vin de Grave, and in the evening a cup of green tea, without milk or sugar, formed the whole of his sustenance. The pangs of hunger he appeased by privately chewing tobacco and smoking cigars.^ — T. Moore ('' Life of Byron"). His voice and accent are peculiarly agreeable, but effeminate,^ clear, harmonious, and so distinct that though his general tone in speaking is rather low than high, not a word is lost. — Countess of Bless- iNGTON (" Conversations of Lord Byron "). Captain Medwin . . . tells us that the noble poet's " voice had a flexibility, a variety in its tones, a power and a pathos beyond any I have heard." . . . But from all I ever heard of it, I should form a very different judgment. His voice, as far ■' At Diodati, in i8i6. ^ Here again we meet with conflicting testimony, for Trelawny says, *' In truth Byron never smoked either pipe or cigar." It is very difficult, however, to reconcile this statement with the allu- sions to smoking which are to be found in Byron's poems. For further particulars about his diet, see pp. 34, 35. ^ Lady Hester Stanhope told Alexander William Kinglake that Byron had an affected manner of speaking and a slight lisp. Kinglake records this in " Eothen." BYROX. 2/ as I was acquainted with it, though not incapable of loudness, nor unmelodious in its deeper tones, was confined. He made an effort when he threw it out. The sound of it in ordinary, except when he laughed, was pretty and lugubrious. He spoke inwardly, and slurred over his syllables, perhaps in order to hide the burr. In short, it was as much the reverse of anything various and powerful, as his enuncia- tion was of anything articulate. . . . Lord Byron had no conversation, properly speaking. He could not interchange ideas or information w^ith you, as a man of letters is expected to do. His thoughts required the concentration of silence and study to bring them to a head, and they deposited the amount in the shape of a stanza. His acquaint- ance with books was very circumscribed. The same personal experience, however, upon which he very properly drew for his authorship, might have ren- dered him a companion more interesting by far than men who could talk better ; and the great reason why his conversation disappointed you was, not that he had not anything to talk about, but that he was haunted by a perpetual affectation, and could not talk sincerely. It was by fits only that he spoke with any gravity, or made his extraordi- nary disclosures ; and at no time did you know^ well what to believe. The rest was all quip and crank, not of the pleasantest kind, and equally dis- tant from simplicity or wit. The best thing to say of it was, that he knew playfulness to be consistent with greatness ; and the worst, that he thought everything in him was great, even to his vul- garities. Mr. Shelley said of him, that he never Conversa- tion. 28 BYRON, Conversa- tion. made you laugh to your own content ... It is not to be concluded, that his jokes were not now and then very happy, or that admirers of his lord- ship, who paid him visits, did not often go away more admiring. I am speaking of his conversation in general, and of the impression it made upon you, ' compared with what was to be expected from a man of wit and experience. — Leigh Hunt (" Lord Byron and his Contemporaries "). Byron is a great talker ; his flippancy ceases in a tete a tete^ and he becomes sententious, abandoning himself to the subject, and seeming to think aloud, though his language has the appearance of stiffness, and is quite opposed to the trifling chit-chat that he enters into when in general society. I attribute this to his having lived so much alone, as also to the desire he now professes of applying himself to prose writing. He affects a sort of Johnsonian tone, likes very much to be listened to, and seems to observe the effect he produces on his hearer. In mixed society his ambition is to appear the man of fashion ; he adopts a light tone of badinage and persiflage that does not sit gracefully on him, but is always anxious to turn the subject to his own per- sonal affairs, or feelings, which are either lamented with an air of melancholy, or dwelt on with playful ridicule, according to the humor he happens to be in. — Countess of Blessington ('' Conversations of Lord Byron "). I never met with any man who shines so much in conversation. He shines the more, perhaps, for not BYRON. 29 seeking to shine. His ideas flow without effort, without his having occasion to think. As in his let- ters, he is not nice about expressions or words ; there are no conceahxients in him, no injunctions to secrecy. He tells everything that he has thought or done without the least reserve, and as if he wished the whole world to know it ; and does not throw the slightest gloss over his errors. . . . He hates argument, and never argues for victory. He gives every one an opportunity of sharing in the con- versation, and has the art of turning it to subjects that may bring out the person with w^hom he con- verses. — Thomas Medwin ("Conversations of Lord Byron ").^ Report had prepared me to meet a man of pecul- iar habits and quick temper, and I had some doubts whether we were likely to suit each other in society. I was most agreeably disappointed in this respect. I found Lord Byron in the highest degree courte- ous, and even kind. We met for an hour or two almost daily in Mr. Murray's drawing-room, and found a great deal to say to each other. Our senti- ments agreed a good deal, except upon the subjects of religion and politics, upon neither of v>^hich I was inclined to believ^e that Lord Byron entertained very fixed opinions. — Sir Walter Scott (quoted in Moore's " Life of Byron "). Everything in his manner, person, and conversa- tion, tended to maintain the charm which his genius ^ Medwin (Thomas). Conversations of Lord Byron, Noted Dur- ing a Residence at Pisa, in 1821 and 1822. 8vo. London, 1824. Com>e*sa- tioft. Conversa- tion and personal charvu 30 BYRON-. had flung around him ; and those admitted to his conversation, far from finding that the inspired poet sunk into ordinary mortality, felt themselves at- tached to him, not only by many noble qualities, but by the interest of a mysterious, undefined, and almost painful curiosity. — Sir Walter Scott {Qiiarterly Review^ October, 1816). Co7t7'ersa- Hon and personal charm. An indis- creet talker He is an extraordinary person, indiscreet to a de- gree that is surprising, exposing his own feelings, and entering into details of those of others which ought to be sacred, with a degree of frankness as un- necessary as it is rare. . Incontinence of speech is his besetting sin. He is, I am persuaded, incapable of keeping any secret, however it may concern his own honor or that of another ; and the first person with whom he found himself tcte a tete would be made the confidant without any reference to his worthiness of the confidence or not. This indiscretion pro- ceeds not from malice, but I should say from want of delicacy of mind. — Countess of Blessington (" Conversations of Lord Byron "). It is strange to see the perfect abandon with which he converses to recent acquaintances, on subjects which even friends would think too delicate for dis- cussion. . . . Byron is perfectly at his ease in society, and generally makes others so, except when he enters into family details, which places persons of any refinement in a painful position. — Countess OF Blessington ( "Idler in Italy ").^ * Blessington (Margaret P. G., Countess of). The Idler in Italy. 3 vols., 8vo. London, 1839. BYRON. 31 He tells a story remarkably well, mimics the man- ner of the persons he describes very successfully, and has a true comic vein when he is disposed to indulge it' — Countess of Blessington {" Idler in Italy"). Could some of the persons who believe him to be their friend, hear with what unction he mimics their peculiarities, unfolds their secrets, displays their defects, and ridicules their vanity, they would not feel gratified by, though they must acknowledge the skill of their dissector ; who, by the accuracy of his remarks and imitations, proves that he has studied his subjects con amore^^ — Countess of Blessington (" Idler in Italy "). To those who only know Lord Byron as an author, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to convey a just impression of him as a man. In him the ele- ments of good and evil were so strongly mixed, that an error could not be detected that was not allied to some good quality ; and his fine qualities, and they were many, could hardly be separated from the faults that sullied them. ... A nearly daily intercourse of ten weeks with Byron left the im- pression on my mind, that if an extraordinary quick- ness of perception prevented his passing over the errors of those with whom he came in contact, and a natural incontinence of speech betrayed him into an ' Several persons have recorded the fact that Byron was a good mimic, and gave excellent imitations of the various actors of his day. ^ See pp. 59-62. A food An apology for his cen- soriousness. 32 BYRON. An apology for his cen- soriousKess. A lover of storms. exposure of them, a candor and good nature, quite as remarkable, often led him to enumerate their virtues, and to draw attention to them. . . . There was no premeditated malignity in Byron's nature ; though constantly in the habit of exposing the follies and vanities of his friends, I never heard him blacken their reputations, and I never felt an unfavorable impression from any of the censures he bestowed, because I saw they were aimed at follies, and not character. . . . The more I see of Byron, the more I am convinced that all he says and does should be judged more leniently than the sayings and doings of others — as his proceed from the impulse of the moment, and never from pre- meditated malice. He cannot resist expressing what- ever comes into his mind ; and the least shade of the ridiculous is seized by him at a glance, and por- trayed with a facility and felicity that must encour- age the propensity to ridicule, which is inherent in him. All the malice of his nature has lodged itself on his lips and the fingers of his right hand — for there is none I am persuaded to be found in his heart, w^hich has more of good than most people give him credit for, except those who have lived with him on habits of intimacy. — Countess of Bless- INGTON ('' Conversations of Lord Byron "). In 1822 the Countess of Blessington talked with a boatman at Geneva, who had been employed by Byron. This man told her, as she states in her " Idler in Italy," that Byron " passed whole nights on the lake, always selecting the most boisterous weather for such expeditions ; " and he said, *' I BYKO.V. 33 never saw a rough evening set in . . . without being sure that he would send for me ; and the higher the wind, and the more agitated the lake, the more he enjoyed it. We have often remained out eighteen hours at a time, and in very bad weather." Such effect had the passionate energy of Kean's acting on his mind, that once, in seeing him play Sir Giles Overreach, he was so affected as to be seized with a sort of convulsive fit ; and we shall find him some years after, in Italy, when the repre- sentation of Alfieri's tragedy of Mirra had agitated him in the same violent manner, comparing the two instances as the only ones in his life when " any- thing under reality " had been able to move him so powerfully. — T. Moore ('' Life of Byron"). His fondness for dogs and other animals is often mentioned by those who knew him intimatel}^ In a letter from Ravenna, in 182 1, Shelley writes : " Lord B.'s establishment consists, besides servants, of ten horses, eight enormous dogs, three monkeys, five cats, an eagle, a crow, and a falcon ; and all these, except the horses, walk about the house, which every now and then resounds with their un- arbitrated quarrels. . . . After I have sealed my letter, I find that my enumeration of the ani- mals in this Circaean Palace was defective, and that in a material point. I have just met on the grand staircase five peacocks, two guinea-hens, and an Egyptian crane. I wonder who all these animals were before they were changed into these shapes." 1—3 A lover of storms. Powerfully affected by Kean's act' ing. Fondness for animals. 34 BYROjV. A little supper. Unable to taste. —(Prose Works of P. B. Shelley, ed. by H. B. For- man, vol. 4, p. 222.)^ The supper . . . took place at Watier's ; . . and as it may convey some idea of his irregular mode of diet, and thus account in part for the frequent derangement of his health, I shall here attempt, from recollection, a description of the supper on this occasion. . . . Having taken upon me to order the repast, and knowing that Lord Byron, for the last two days, had done noth- ing towards sustenance, beyond eating a few bis- cuits, and (to appease appetite) chewing mastic, I desired that we should have a good supply of, at least, two kinds of fish. My companion, however, confined himself to lobsters, and of these finished two or three to his OAvn share, — interposing, some two or three times, a small liquer-glass of strong white brandy, sometimes a tumbler of very hot water, and then pure brandy again, to the amount of near half a dozen of the latter, without which, alternately with the hot water, he appeared to think the lobster could not be digested. After this we had claret, of which, having despatched two bottles be- tween us, at about four o'clock in the morning we parted. — T. Moore (^' Life of Byron"). Byron had no palate. Trelawny could mix his gin-and-water as weak as he chose without By- ron's taking any notice of it whatever ; once he ^ Shelley (Percy B.). Works in Verse and Prose. Ed. by H. B. Forman. 8 vols., 8vo. London, 1880. BYRON. 35 purposely missed out the gin altogether, and Byron seemed struck by it only after several sips. — W. M. RossETTi (" Talks with Trelawny," Athenceum, July 15, 1882). Rev. Alexander Dyce, in his volume of Rogers' table-talk (published anonymously)/ gives this story, as told by Rogers : '' Neither Moore nor my- self had ever seen Byron when it was settled that he should dine at my house to meet Moore: nor was he known by sight to Campbell, who, happening to call upon me that morning, consented to join the party. . . . When we sat down to dinner I asked Byron if he would take soup ? *No ; he never took soup.' — Would he take some fish ? ' No ; he never took fish.' Presently I asked him if he would eat some mutton? 'No ; he never ate mutton.' I then asked him if he would take a glass of wine ? ' No ; he never tasted wine.' — It was now necessary to in- quire what he did eat and drink ; and the answer was, * Nothing but hard biscuits and soda-water.' Unfortunately, neither hard biscuits nor soda-water were at hand ; and he dined upon potatoes bruised down on his plate and drenched with vinegar. . . . Some days after, meeting Hobhouse, I said to him, '■ How long will Lord Byron persevere in his present diet ? ' He replied, ' Just as long as you continue to notice it.' I did not then know, what I now know to be a fact, — that Byron, after leaving my house, had gone to a club in St. James' Street, and eaten a hearty meat-supper." ^ Dyce (Rev. Alexander). Recollections of the Table-talk of Samuel Rogers. i2mo. London, 1856. Unable to taste. A dinner 7vith Rogers. 36 BYRON. Melancholy and sus- j)icious. Convivial- ity. He was often melancholy, almost gloomy. When I observed him in this humor I used either to wait till it went off of its own accord, or till some natural and easy mode occurred of leading him into con- versation, when the shadows almost always left his countenance, like the mist arising from a landscape. I think I also remarked in his temper starts of sus- picion, when he seemed to pause and consider whether there had not been a secret and perhaps offensive meaning in something that was said to him. In this case I also judged it best to let his mind, like a troubled spring, work itself clear, which it did in a minute or two. A downright steadiness of manner v\^as the way to his good opin- ion. Will Rose, looking by accident at his feet, saw him scowling furiously ; but on his showing no consciousness, his lordship resumed his easy man- ner. — Sir Walter Scott (quoted in Moore's " Life of Byron "). Byron is of a very suspicious nature ; he dreads imposition on all points, declares that he forgoes many things, from the fear of being cheated in the purchase, and is afraid to give way to the natural impulses of his character, lest he should be duped or mocked. — Countess of Blessington ('' Conversa- tions of Lord Byron "). It is a credit to my noble acquaintance, that he was by far the pleasantest when he had got wine in his head. . . . When in his cups, which was not often, nor immoderately, he was inclined to be tender ; but not weakly so, nor lachrymose. I know BYRON. 37 not how it might have been with everybody, but he paid me the compliment of being excited to his very best feelings ; and when I rose late to go away, he would hold me down, and say with a look of entreaty, "Not yet." Then it was that I seemed to talk with the proper natural Byron as he ought to have been ; . . . Next morning it was all gone. His intimacy with the worst part of mankind had got him again in its chilling crust ; and nothing remained but to despair and joke. In wine he would volunteer an imitation of somebody, generally of Incledon. He was not a good mimic in the detail, but he could give a lively broad sketch ; and over his cups his imitations were good-natured, which was seldom the case at other times. — Leigh Hunt ("Lord Byron and his Contemporaries "). William Bankes talked with much affection of Byron ; his sensitiveness to criticism. When Bankes v/as with him in Venice, he told Byron of some Mr. S (then also in Venice, and, as Byron said, " a salt fish seller ") who declared that Don Jua7i was all " Grub Street." The effect of this on Byron was so great, that Bankes is of opinion (as indeed, Byron himself told him) that it stopped Don Juan for some time. " That damned Mr. S ," he used to say. . . . He also showed Bankes one day a drawer containing the MS. of Don Juan^ saying : '' Look, here is Mr. S 's Grub Street." — Thomas Moore (^' Journal").^ ' Moore (Thomas). Memoirs, Journal, and Correspondence. Edited by Lord John Russell. 8 vols., 8vo. London, 1853-56. Convivial- ity. Sensitive- lie ss to criticism. 38 BYRON. Dreads to be thought sen- timental. Affectation of insensi- bility. The anxiety with which, at all periods of his life, but particularly at the present,^ he sought to repel the notion that, except when under the actual in- spiration of writing, he was at all influenced by poetical associations, very frequently displayed itself. "You must have been highly gratified," said a gentleman to him, '' by the classical remains and recollections which you met with in your visit to Ithaca." — "You quite mistake me," answered Lord Byron — '* I have no poetical humbug about me ; I am too old for that. Ideas of that sort are confined to rhyme."— T. Moore (" Life of Byron "). Lord Byron was our cicerone, and took us to Nervi, one of the prettiest rides imaginable and commanding a fine view of the sea. He pointed out the spots whence the views were the most beau- tiful, but with a coldness of expression that was re- markable. Observing that I smiled at this insensi- bility, he too smiled, and said, " I suppose you expected me to explode into some enthusiastic ex- clamations on the sea, the scenery, etc., such as poets indulge in, or rather are supposed to indulge in ; but the truth is, I hate cant of every kind, and the cant of the love of nature as much as any other." So to avoid the appearance of one affecta- tion he assumes another, that of not admiring. He especially eschews every symptom indicative of his poetical feelings ; yet, nevertheless, they break out continually in various ways when he is off his guard. — Countess of Blessington (" Idler in Italy"). \ In 1823, during liis Grecian campaign. BYRON. 39 Perceiving, as he \valked the deck, a small yatha- gan, or Turkish dagger, on one of the benches, he took it up, unsheathed it, and having stood for a few moments contemplating the blade, was heard to say, in an under voice, " I should like to know how a person feels after committing a murder ! " — T. Moore (" Life of Byron "). Other testimony as to Byron's tendency to be melodramatic comes from two artists, the sculptor, Thorwaldsen, and the painter, W. E. West. Hans Christian Andersen, in his " Story of My Life," ^ re- ports a story told him by Thorwaldsen, as follows : *'When I was about to make Byron's statue, he placed himself just opposite to me, and began im- mediately to assume quite another countenance to what was customary to him. 'Will you not sit still ? ' said I ; 'but you must not make these faces.' * It is my expression,' said Byron. ' Indeed ? ' said I, and then I made him as I wished, and every- body said, when it was finished, that I had hit the likeness. When Byron, however, saw it, he said, * It does not resemble me at all ; I look more un- happy ! ' " Vv^est, who painted his portrait, says : *' He was a bad sitter ; he assumed a countenance that did not belong to him, as though he were thinking of a frontispiece for Childe Harold. " Byron had one pre-eminent fault, a fault which must be considered as deeply criminal by every one ' Andersen (Hans Christian). Story of My Life to 1S67. i6mo. New York, 1871. Melodra- matic J>os- Srif- lafuier. 40 byron; Self- slander. " There al- loays 7V.IS a jtiailness 171 thefamily^'' who does not, as I do, believe it to have resulted from monomania. He had a morbid love of a bad reputation. There was hardly an offence of which he would not, with perfect indifference accuse him- self. An old school-fellow, who met him on the Continent, told me that he would continually write paragraphs against himself in the foreign journals, and delight in their republication by the English newspapers as in the success of a practical joke. . . . If I could remember, and v/ere willing to re- peat, the various misdoings which I have from time to time heard him attribute to himself, I could fill a volume. But I never believed them. I very soon be- came aware of this strange idiosyncrasy. It puzzled me to account for it ; but there it was — a sort of diseased and distorted vanity. The same eccentric spirit would induce him to report things which were false with regard to his family, which anybody else would have concealed, though true. He told me more than once that his father was insane and killed himself. I shall never forget the manner in which he first told me this. While washing his hands, and singing a gay Neapol- itan air, he stopped, looked round at me, and said, " There always was a madness in the family." Then after continuing his washing and his song, as if speaking of a matter of the slightest indifference, " My father cut his throat." ... In this in- stance I had no doubt that the fact was as he related it, but in speaking of it a few years since to an old lady in whom I had perfect confidence, she assured me that it was not so. . . . Except this love of an ill name ... I have BYRON. 41 no personal knowledge whatever of any evil act or evil disposition of Lord Byion's. I once said this to a gentleman, who was well acquainted with Lord Byron's London life. He expressed himself as- tonished at what I said. " Well," I replied, " do you know any harm of him but what he told you himself ? " " Oh, yes, a hundred things ! " "I don't want you to tell me a hundred things, I shall be content with one." Flere the conversation was in- terrupted. We were at dinner — there was a large party, and the subject was again renewed at table. But afterwards, in the drawing-room, Mr. Drury came up to me and said, " I have been thinking of what you were saying at dinner. I do 7iot know any harm of Byron but what he has told me of himself." — William Harness (L'Estrange's " Life of Har- ness ").^ To such a perverse length . . . did he carry this fancy for self-defamation, that if (as sometimes, in his moments of gloom, he persuaded himself), there was any tendency to derangement in his men- tal constitution, on this point alone could it be pronounced to have manifested itself. In the early part of my acquaintance with him, when he most gave way to this humor, ... I have known him more than once, as we have sat together after dinner, and he was, at the time, perhaps, a little under the influence of wine, to fall seriously into this sort of dark and self-accusing mood, and throw ^ L'Estranrje (Rev. A. G.). The Literary Life of the Rev. Will- iam Harness. London, 1870. " There al- ways was ii madness in thefainilyP Fond of a had rej>uta' Hon. 42 BY RON: Fond of a bad reputa- tion. Love of mystifica- tion. out hints of his past life with an air of gloom and mystery designed evidently to awaken curiosity and interest. — T. Moore ('' Life of Byron "). It is difficult to judge when Lord Byron is serious or not. He has a habit of mystifying, that might impose upon many, but that can be detected by examining his physiognomy ; for a sort of mock gravity, now and then broken by a malicious smile, betrays when he is speaking for effect, and not giv- ing utterance to his real sentiments. . . . The love of mystification is so strong in Byron, that he is continually letting drop mysterious hints of events in his past life : as if to excite curiosity, he assumes, on those occasions, a look and air suited to the insinuation conveyed ; if it has excited the curiosity of his hearers, he is satisfied, looks still more mysterious, and changes the subject ; but if it fails to rouse curiosity, he becomes evidently dis- composed and sulky, stealing sly glances at the person he had been endeavoring to mystify, to ob- serve the effect he has produced. On such occa- sions I have looked at him a little maliciously, and laughed, vv^ithout asking a single question ; and I have often succeeded in making him laugh too at those mystifications, manqiiee as I called them. . . . I am sure that if ten individuals undertook the task of describing Byron, no two, of the ten, would agree in their verdict respecting him, or con- vey any portrait that resembled the other, and yet the description of each might be correct, according to his or her received opinion ; but the truth is, the chameleon-like character or manner of Byron ren- BYJ^ON. 43 ders it difficult to portray him ; and the pleasure he seems to take in misleading his associates in their estimate of him increases the difficulty of the task. This extraordinary fancy of his has so often str-uck me, that I expect to see all the persons who have lived with him giving portraits, each unlike the other, and yet all bearing a resemblance to the orisfinal at some one time. — Countess of Blessing- TON ("Conversations of Lord Byron"). He declares that, in addition to his other failings, avarice is now established. This new vice, like all the others he attributes to himself, he talks of as one would name those of an acquaintance, in a sort of deprecating, yet half mocking tone ; as much as to say, you see I know all my faults better than you do, though I don't choose to correct them : indeed, it has often occurred to me, that he brings forward his defects, as if in anticipation of some one else expos- ing them, which he would not like ; as, though he af- fects the contrary, he is jealous of being found fault with, and shows it in a thousand v/ays. He affects to dislike hearing his works praised or referred to ; I say affects, because I am sure the dislike is not real or natural, as he who loves praise, as Byron evidently does, in other things, cannot dislike it for that in which he must be conscious it is deserved. He refers to his feats in horsemanship, shooting at a mark, and swimming, in a way that proves he likes to be complimented on them ; and nothing appears to give him more satisfaction than being considered a man of fashion, who had great success in fashionable society in London, when he resided Love of inystijica- tioii. Confessing vices. Cojirting admiration 44 byron: Fickleness and ijista- bility. there. — Countess of Blessington (" Conversations of Lord Byron "). Byron seems to take a peculiar pleasure in ridi- culing sentiment and romantic feelings ; and yet the day after will betray both, to an extent that appears impossible to be sincere, to those who had heard his previous sarcasms : that he is sincere, is evident, as his eyes fill w4th tears, his voice becomes tremulous, and his whole manner evinces that he feels what he says. All this appears so inconsistent, that it de- stroys sympathy, or if it does not quite do that, it makes one angry with oneself for giving way to it for one who is never for two days of the same way of thinking, or at least expressing himself. He talks for effect, likes to excite astonishment, and certainly destroys in the minds of his auditors all confidence in his stability of character. This must, I am cer- tain, be felt by all who have lived much in his society ; and the impression is not satisfactory. . . . There are days when he excites so strong an interest and sympathy, by showing such un- doubtable proofs of good feeling, that every pre- vious impression to his disadvantage fades away, and one is vexed w^ith oneself for ever having harbored them. But alas ! *'the morrow comes," and he is no longer the same being. Some disagreeable letter, review, or new example of the slanders w4th w^hich he has been for years assailed, changes the whole current of his feelings — renders him reckless. Sar- donic, and as unlike the Byron of the day before as if they had nothing in com.mon, — nay, he seems deter- mined to efface any good impression he might have BYRON. 45 made, and appears angry with himself for having yielded to the kindly feelings that gave birth to it. . . . This instability of opinion, or expression of opinion, of Byron, destroys all confidence in him, and precludes the possibility of those, who live much in his society, feeling that sentiment of confiding se- curity in him, without which a real regard cannot subsist. — Countess of Blessington (" Conversations of Lord B)^ron "). There was . young nobleman . about this extraordinary something that, even while he w^as agreeable, checked all confidence ; for though his temper was not decidedly bad, it was skinless and capricious, and I was not always in a hum.or to accord that indulgence which he constantly required. Of all the men I have ever knowm, he had the least equanimity, and yet in his felicitous moments he was singularly amusing, often interesting. To me there was an agreeable excitement frequently pro- duced by his conversation, but he claimed more deference than I was disposed to grant. — John Galt (" Autobiography ").' Few men possessed more companionable qualities than Lord Byron did occasionally : and seen at in- tervals, in those felicitous moments, I imagine it would have been difficult to have said, that a more interesting companion had been previously met with. But he was not always in that fascinating ^ Byron, when thus described, was about twenty-three years old. 2 Gait (John). Autobiography. 2 vols., Svo. London, 1833. Fickleftess and insta- bility. Irritable and exact- No depend- ence to be placed upon his moods. 46 BYRGN. No depend- ence to be placed upon his moods. Fondness /or arms. state of pleasantry : he was as often otherwise ; and no two individuals could be more distinct from each other than Byron in his gayety and his gloom. This antithesis was the great cause of that diversity of opinion concerning him, which has so much divided his friends and adversaries. — John Galt (" Life of Byron "). Those only, who lived for some time with him, could believe that a man's temper, Proteus like, was capable of assuming so many shapes. It may liter- ally be said, that at different hours of the day ?ie metamorphosed himself into four or more individ- uals, each possessed of the most opposite qualities. . . . In the course of the day he might become the most morose, and the most gay ; and the most melancholy, and the most frolicsome ; the most gen- erous, and the most penurious ; the most benevolent, and the most misanthropic ; . . . the most gentle being in existence, and the most irascible. — Julius Millingen (" Memoirs of Affairs of Greece "). Moore tells us that Byron constantly had arms of some kind about him ; it was his practice, he says, "when quite a boy, to carry at all -times small loaded pistols in his waistcoat pockets." Elsewhere Moore says : " Such a passion, indeed, had he for arms of every description, that there generally lay a small sword by the side oi his bed, with which he used to amuse himself by thrusting it through his bed- hangings." The Countess of Blessington says, in her " Idler in Ital)^," that a boatman at Geneva, employed by Byron, told her that the poet never i byron: 47 entered his boat \vithout a case of pistols, which he always kept by him. Byron was very fond of shooting at a mark, and was a capital shot. Byron has little taste for the fine arts ; and when they are the subject of conversation, betrays an ig- norance very surprising in a man who has travelled so much. He says that he feels art, while others p?'ate about it ; but his neglect of the beautiful specimens of it here goes far to prove the contrary. — Countess of Blessington ("Idler in Italy"). Lord Byron once wrote me a letter ... in which he pronounced " Reubens " to be *' a dauber." He knew so little of pictures, that you see he had not even read enough about the very names of the artists to be able to spell them. — Leigh Hunt (ex- tract from a letter). I should say that a bad and vulgar taste predomi- nated in all Byron's equipments, whether in dress or in furniture. I saw his bed at Genoa, when I passed through in 1826, and it certainly was the most gaudily vulgar thing I ever saw ; the curtains in the worst taste, and the cornice having his family motto, " Crede Byron," surmounted by baronial coronets. His carriages and his livery were in the same bad taste, having an affectation of finery, but mesqui?t in the details, and tawdry in the ensemble j and it w^as evident that he piqued himself on them, by the complacency with which they were referred to. These trifles are touched upon as being char- acteristic of the man, and would have been passed Fondness Jbr arvts. Indiffer- ence to the Jine arts. Vulgar taste. 48 BYRON. Vulgar taste. Pride of rank. by, as unworthy of notice, had he not shown that they occupied a considerable portion of his atten- tion. He has CA^en asked us if they were not rich and handsome, and then remarked that no wonder they were so, as they had cost him a great deal of money. — Countess of Blessington (" Conversations of Lord Byron "). Byron came to see us to-day, and appeared ex- tremely discomposed ; after half an hour's conver- sation on indifferent subjects, he at length broke out with, " Only fancy my receiving a tragedy to-day dedicated as follows — ^* From George to George Byron ! ' This is being cool with a vengeance. I never w^as more provoked. How stupid, how igno- rant, to pass over my rank ! " . . . Were he but sensible how much the Lo7'd is overlooked in the Foet he would be less vain of his rank ; but as it is, this vanity is very prominent, and resembles more the pride of 2, parvenu^ than the calm dignity of an ancient aristocrat. It is also evident that he attaches importance to the appendages of rank and station. The trappings of luxury, to which a short use ac- customs every one, seem to please him ; he observes, nay, comments upon them, and oh ! mortifying con- clusion, appears at least for the moment to think more highly of their possessors. As his own mode of life is so extremely simple, this seems the more ex- traordinary ; but everything in him is contradict- ory and extraordinary. — Countess of Blessington ("Conversations of Lord Byron "). One day that Byron dined with us, his chasseur, BYRON. 49 while we were at table, demanded to speak with him : he left the room, and returned in a few min- utes in a state of violent agitation, pale with anger, and looking as I had never before seen him look, though I had often seen him angry. He told us that his servant had come to tell him that he must pass the gate of Genoa (his house being outside the town) before half past ten o'clock, as orders were given that no one was to be allowed to pass after. This order, which had no personal refer- ence to him, he conceived to be expressly levelled at him, and it rendered him furious : he seized a pen, and commenced a letter to our minister — tore two or three letters one after the other, before he had written one to his satisfaction ; and, in short, betrayed such ungovernable rage, as to astonish all who were present ; he seemed very much disposed to enter into a personal contest with the authori- ties ; and we had some difficulty in persuading him to leave the business wholly in the hands of Mr. Hill, the English Minister, who would arrange it much better. — Countess of Blessington (" Conver- sations of Lord Byron"). Moore tells us that on one occasion *' in a fit of vexation and rage ... he furiously dashed his watch, a favorite old watch which had been his companion since boyhood, upon the hearth, and ground it to pieces among the ashes with the poker."' ^ Trelawny, in an interview reported in the Whitehall Review, in 1880, said that he did not think that Bjnron ever wore a watch. 1—4 Unreason- able rage. Destroying his luatc/i. 50 BYRON'. FliJ>pancy, At Venice in i8i8. I had expected to find him a dignified, cold, re- served, and haughty person, resembling those mys- terious personages he so loves to paint in his works, and with whom he has been so often identified by the good-natured world ; but nothing can be more different ; for were I to point out the prominent de- fect of Lord Byron, I should say it was flippancy, and a total want of that natural self-possession and dignity which ought to characterize a man of birth and education. — Countess of Blessington {" Con- versations of Lord Byron "). Occasionally, indeed, the fervor of the poet warmed his expression, and always the fire of genius kindled his eye ; but, in general, an affecta- tion of fashion pervaded his manner, and the insou- ciance of satiety spread a languor over his conversa- tion. He was destitute of that simplicity of thought and manner which is the attendant of the highest intellect, and which was so conspicuous in Scott. He was always aiming at effect : and the effect he desired was rather that of fashion than of genius ; he sought rather to astonish than impress. He seemed ^/^i-/with every enjoyment of life, affected rather the successful roue than the great poet, and deprecated beyond everything the cant of morality. The impression he wished to leave on the mind was that of a man who had tasted to the dregs of all the enjoyments of life, and above all of high life, and thought everything else mere balderdash and affec- tation. — Sir a. Alison ("Autobiography").^ - Alison (SirArchibald). Some Account of my Life and Writings. An Autobiography. 2 vols., 8vo. London, 18S3. BYRON'. 51 His superstition was remarkable. I do not mean in the ordinary sense, because it was superstition, but because it was petty and old-womanish. He believed in the ill-luck of Fridays, and was seriously disconcerted if anything was to be done on that frightful day of the week. Had he been a Roman, he would have startled at crows, while he made a jest of augurs. — Leigh Hunt ("Lord Byron and his Contemporaries "). He is extremely superstitious, and seems offended with those who cannot, or will not, partake this weakness. He has frequently touched on this sub- ject, and tauntingly observed to me, that I must believe myself wiser than him, because I was not superstitious. . . . Byron is, I believe, sincere in his belief in supernatural appearances ; he assumes a grave and mysterious air when he talks on the subject, which he is fond of doing. . . . He is also superstitious about days, and other trifling things, believes in lucky and unlucky days, dislikes undertaking anything on a Friday, helping or being helped to salt at table, spilling salt or oil, letting bread fall, and breaking mirrors ; in short he gives way to a thousand fantastical notions, that prove that even V esprit le plus fort has its weak side. — Countess OF Blessington (" Conversations of Lord Byron "). Went on the water in the evening. Byron was much inclined to accompany us, but when we were about to embark, a superstitious presentiment in- duced him to give up the water party ; which set us all laughing at him, which he bore very well, al- Supersti- tion. Instances of his supe*-- stitioH. 52 BYRON. Inst af tees of his super- stition. Niggardli- ness. though he half smiled and said, '* No, no, good folk, you shall not laugh me out of my superstition, even though you may think me a fool for it." ^ — Countess of Blessington {" Idler in Italy"). All that was now left of our Pisan circle estab- lished themselves at Albano^ — Byron, Leigh Hunt, and Mrs. Shelley. I took up my quarters in the city of palaces. The fine spirit that had animated and held us together was gone ! Left to our own devices, we degenerated apace. Shelley's solidity had checked Byron's flippancy, and induced him oc- casionally to act justly, and talk seriously ; now he seemed more sordid and selfish than ever. He be- haved shabbily to Mrs. Shelley ; I might use a harsher epithet. In all the transactions between Shelley and Byron in which expenses had occurred, and there were many, the former, as was his custom, had paid all, the latter promising to repay ; but as no one ever repaid Shelley, Byron did not see the necessity of his setting the example ; and now that Mrs. Shelley was left destitute by her husband's death, Byron did nothing for her. He regretted this when too late, for in our voyage to Greece, he alluded to Shelley, saying, *'Tre, you did what I should have done, let us square accounts to-morrow ; I must pay my debts." I merely observed, "Money is of no use at sea, and when you get on shore, you * Lady Blessington also tells of his having given her a pin, and asked her to return it to him the next day, because it was unlucky to give anything with a sharp point. She returned it, and he gave her a chain instead. 2 After Shelley's death. BYRON. 53 will find you have none to spare ; " he probably thought so too, for he said nothing more on the subject. — E. J. Trelawny (" Records of Shelley, Byron, etc."). In speaking of the foolish charge of avarice brought against Lord Byron by some who resented thus his not suffering them to impose on his generosity, Colo- nel Napier says, '' I never knew a single instance of it while he was here.^ I saw only a judicious gene- rosity in all that he did. He would not allow him- self to be robbed., but he gave profusely when he thought he was doing good. . . . He gave a vast deal of money to the Greeks in various ways." — T; Moore (" Life of Byron"). It is undoubtedly true that Byron was often gene- rous to a lavish degree. He was particularly kind to his servants, and succeeded in winning and retain- ing their devotion. The varying testimony upon this point is but another illustration of the difficulties which the student of Byron's life meets at every step. May 22, 1823. We have purchased Byron's yacht, the Bolivar. . . . We agreed to leave the nomination of the price to Mr. Barry, but Byron contended for a larger sum than that gentleman thought it worth. The poet is certainly fond of money, and this growing passion displays itself on many occasions. He has so repeatedly and earn- estly begged me to let him have my horse Mame- ^ In Greece. Niggardli- ness. Witnesses disagree as to his liber- ality a7id vieaii?iess. Two bargains. 54 BYRON. Two bargains. In fashion- able society. luke to take to Greece . . . that I have, although very unwilling to part from him, con- sented. 23d. A letter from Byron, saying that he cannot afford to give more than eighty pounds for Mame- luke. I paid a hundred guineas, and would rather lose two hundred than part with him. How strange, to beg and entreat to have the horse resigned to him, and then name a less price than he cost ! — Countess OF Blessington ("Idler in Italy"). I happened to be in London when Lord Byron's fame was reaching its height, and saw much of him in society. . . . Though he was far from being a great or ambitious talker, his presence at this time made the fortune of any dinner or drawing-room party for which it could be obtained ; and was al- ways known by a crowd gathered round him, the female portion generally predomxinating. I have seen many of these epidemic impulses of fashion in London society, but none more marked than this. There was a certain haughtiness or seeming indif- ference in his manner of receiving the homage ten- dered him, which did not however prevent him from resenting its withdrawal — an inconsistency not limited to the case of Lord Byron.* Though brought into frequent intercourse by our common travels in the East, my intimacy with him went little beyond this. He was not a man with whom it was easy to cultivate friendship. He had that double or conflicting nature, well pictured by Dante, which ^ See p. 126. BYjROX. 55 rendered difficult any close or continued relations with him. — Sir Henry Holland (" Recollections ").^ Byron, at first, had been more eager than Shelley for Leigh Hunt's arrival in Italy to edit and contrib- ute to the proposed new Review, and so continued until his English correspondents had worked on his fears. They did not oppose, for they knew his temper too well, but artfully insinuated that he was jeopardizing his fame and fortune, etc., etc. Shel- ley found Byron so irritable, so shuffling and equivo- cating, whilst talking v/ith him on the fulfilment of his promises to Leigh Hunt, — that, but for imperil- ling Hunt's prospects, Shelley's intercourse with Byron would have abruptly terminated. — E. J. Tre- LAWNY (" Records of Shelley, Byron," etc.). Byron talked to-day of Leigh Hunt, regretted his ever having embarked in the Liberal, and said that it had drawn a nest of hornets on him ; but ex- pressed a very good opinion of the talents and prin- ciple of Mr. Hunt, though, as he said, '' our tastes are so opposite, that we are totally unsuited to each other." ... I can perceive that he wishes Mr. Hunt and his family away. It appears to me that Byron is a person who, without reflection, would form engagements which, when condemned by his friends or advisers, he would gladly get out of without considering the means, or, at least, without reflecting on the humiliation such a desertion must ^ Holland (Sir Heniy). don, 1872. Recollections of Past Life. 8vo. Lon- Treatment of Leigh Hunt. Relations ■with Leigh Hunt. 56 byron: Relntto7is •with LeighHunt. Life at J 'is a. inflict on the persons he had associated with him. He gives me the idea of a man, who feeling himself in such a dilemma, would become cold and ungra- cious to the parties with whom he so stood, before he had mental courage sufficient to abandon them. I may be wrong, but the whole of his manner of talking of Mr. Hunt gives me this impression, though he has not said what might be called an unkind word of him. — Countess of Blessington (" Conversations of Lord Byron "). Our manner of life v/as this. Lord Byron, who used to sit up at night, writing " Don Juan " (which he did under the influence of gin and water), rose late in the morning. He breakfasted ; read ; lounged about, singing an air, generally out of Rossini, and in a swaggering style, though in a voice at once small and veiled ; then took a bath and was dressed ; and coming down-stairs, was heard, still singing, in the court -yard, out of which the garden ascended at the back of the house. The servants at the same time brought out two or three chairs. My study, a little room in a corner, with an orange tree peeping in at the window, looked upon this court-yard. I was generally at my writing when he came down, and either acknowledged his presence by getting up and saying something from the window, or he called out " Leontius ! " ^ and came halting up to the win- dow with some joke, or other challenge to conver- sation. (Readers of good sense will do me the jus- tice of discerning where anything is spoken of in a ^ A name given to Leigh Hunt by Shelley, BYRON. 57 tone of objection, and where it is only brought in as requisite to the truth of the picture.) His dress, as at Monte Nero, was a nankeen jacket, with white waistcoat and trowsers, and a cap, either velvet or linen, with a shade to it. In his hand was a tobacco- box, from which he helped himself like unto a ship- man. . . . We then lounged about, or sat and talked, Madame Guiccioli with her sleek tresses de- scending after her toilet to join us. . . . In the course of an hour or two, being an early riser, I used to go in to dinner. Lord Byron either stayed a little loriger, or went up-stairs to his books and his couch. When the heat of the day declined, we rode out, either on horseback or in a barouche, generally towards the forest. He was a good rider, graceful, and kept a firm seat. . . . Of an even- ing I seldom saw him. He recreated himself in the balcony, or with a book ; and at night, when I went to bed, he was just thinking of setting to work with " Don Juan." — Leigh Hunt ^ (" Lord Byron and his Contemporaries "). ' It seems only fair to state, in connection with the numerous extracts from Leigh Hunt's "Lord Byron and Some of his Con- temporaries," that the author made a sort of apology, many years afterv/ards, in his autobiography, for the severity of his observa- tions upon Byron. He says, in alluding to his former work, "I was then a young man. ... I was agitated by grief and anger. ... I am now free from anger. ... I am sorry that I ever wrote a syllable respecting Lord B5rron which might have been spared." The editor, however, feels fully justified in making use of these very severe criticisms ; for Leigh Hunt also says, in his autobiography, "I do not mean that I ever wrote any fictions about him. I wrote nothing which I did not feel to be true, or think so." Life at Fisa, 58 DYRON. Hunfs dis- section of Byro7i : Lack of ad- dress. Jealous of sufierlority in others. If Lord Byron had been a man of address, he would have been a kinder man. He never heartily forgave either you or himself for his deficiency on this point ; and hence a good deal of his ill-temper and his carelessness of your feelings. By any means, fair or foul, he was to make up for the disadvan- tage ; and with all his exaction of conventional pro- priety from others, he could set it at naught in his own conduct in the most remarkable manner. He had an incontinence, I believe unique, in talking of his affairs, and showing you other people's letters. He would even make you presents of them ; and I have accepted one or two that they might go no farther. — Leigh Hunt (*' Lord Byron and his Con- temporaries "). We have been told of authors who were jealous even of beautiful women, because they divided at- tention. I do not think Lord Byron would Iiave entertained a jealousy of this sort. He would have thought the women too much occupied with him- self. But he would infallibly have been jealous, had the beautiful woman been a wit, or drawn a circle round her piano-forte. With men I have seen him hold the most childish contests for superiority ; so childish that had it been possible for him to divest himself of a sense of his pretensions and public character, they would have exhibited some- thing of the conciliating simplicity of Goldsmith. He would then lay imaginary wagers ; and in a style which you would not have looked for in high life, thrust out his chin, and give knowing, self- estimating nods of the head, half nod and half shake. BYROA^. 59 such as boys playing at chuck-farthing give, when they say, "Come, I tell you what now!" A fat dandy who came upon us at Genoa, and pretended to be younger than he was, and to wear his own hair, discomposed him for the day. He declaimed against him in so deploring a tone, and uttered the word " wig " so often, that my two eldest boys, who were in the next room, were obliged to stifle their laughter. — Leigh Hunt ("Lord Byron and his Con- temporaries "). He was anxious to show you that he possessed no Shakespeare or Milton; *' because," he said, "he had been accused of borrowing from them ! " He affected to doubt whether Shakespeare was so great a genius as he has been taken for, and whether fashion had not a great deal to do with it. . . . Spenser he could not read ; at least he said so. All the gusto of that most poetical of the poets went with him for nothing. I lent him a volume of the " Fairy Queen," and he said he would try to like it. Next day he brought it to my study-window, and said, " Here, Hunt, here is your Spenser. I cannot see anything in him ; " and he seemed anxious that I bhould take it out of his hands, as if he was afraid of being accused of copying so poor a writer. That he saw nothing in Spenser is not likely ; but I really do not think that he saw much. Spenser was too much out of the world, and he too much in it. — Leigh Hunt ("Lord Byron and his Contem- poraries "). It has been said in a magazine, that I was always Jealous of superiority in others. Opinion of Shake- speare and Spcjiser. 6o BYRON. Weak in arguffzent. Jtgotism and vanity. arguing with Lord Byron. Nothing can be more untrue. I was indeed almost always differing, and to such a degree, that I was fain to keep the differ- ence to myself. I differed so much, that I argued as little as possible. His lordship was so poor a logician, that he did not even provoke argument. When you openly differed with him, in anything like a zealous manner, the provocation was caused by something foreign to reasoning, and not pretend- ing to it. He did not care for argument, and, what is worse, was too easily convinced at the moment, or appeared to be so, to give any zest to disputation. He gravely asked me one day, "What it was that convinced me in argument ? " I said, I thought I was convinced by the strongest reasoning. '' For my part," said he, *'it is the last speaker that con- vinces me." And I believe lie spoke truly ; but then he was only convinced, till it was agreeable to him to be moved otherwise. He did not care for the truth. He admired only the convenient and the ornamental. He w^as moved to and fro, not because there was any ultimate purpose which he would give up, but solely because it was most troublesome to sit still and resist. — Leigh Hunt (" Lord Byron and his Contemporaries "). He would make confessions of vanity, or some other fault, or of inaptitude for a particular species of writing, partly to sound what you thought of it, partly that while you gave him credit for the hu- mility, you were to protest against the concession. All the perversity of his spoiled nature would then come into play ; and it was in these, and simi- BYRON. 6i lar perplexities, that the main difficulty of living with him consisted. If you made everything tell in his favor, as most people did, he was pleased with you for not differing with him, but then nothing was gained. The reverse would have been an affront. He lumped you with the rest ; and was prepared to think as little of you in the particular, as he did of any one else. If you contested a claim, or allowed him to be in the right in a concession, he could neither argue the point nor really concede it. He was only mortified, and would take his re- venge. Lastly, if you behaved neither like his ad- mirers in general, nor in a sulky or disputatious manner, but naturally, and as if you had a right to your jest and your independence, whether to differ with or admire, and apart from an eternal considera- tion of himself, he thought it an assumption, and would perplex you with all the airs and humors of an insulted beauty. Thus nobody could rely, for a com- fortable intercourse with him, either upon admis- sions or non-admissions, or even upon flattery itself. An immeasurable vanity kept even his adorers at a distance ; like Xerxes enthroned, with his millions a mile off. And if, in a fit of desperation, he conde- scended to comxC closer and be fond, he laughed at you for thinking yourself of consequence to him, if you w^ere taken in ; and hated you if you stood out, which was to think yourself of greater con- sequence. Neither would a knowledge of all this, if you had made him conscious, have lowered his self- admiration a jot. He would have thought it the mark of a great man, — a noble capriciousness, — an evidence of power, v/hich none but the Alexanders E got is 711 and vanity 62 BYRON. Egotistn and vanity. Vindiciive- ness. " The Snake.^' and Napoleons of the intellectual world could vent- ure upon. Mr. Hazlitt had some reason to call him "a sublime coxcomb." Who but he (or Rochester perhaps, whom he resembled) would have thought of avoiding Shakespeare, lest he should be thought to owe him anything ? And talking of Napoleon, — he delighted, when he took the additional name of Noel, in consequence of his marriage with an heir- ess, to sign himself N. B. ; "because," said he, " Bonaparte and I are the only public persons whose initials are the same." — Leigh Hunt ("Lord Byron and his Contemporaries "). Rev. Alexander Dyce, in his " Recollections of the Table-talk of Samuel Rogers," ^ quotes Rogers as follows : "In those days at least,^ Byron had no readiness of reply in conversation. If you hap- pened to let fall any observation which offended him, he would say nothing at the time ; but the of- fence would lie rankling in his mind ; and, perhaps a fortnight after, he Avould come out with some very cutting remarks upon you, giving them as his de- liberate opinions, the results of his experience of your character." Goethe's Mephistopheles calls the serpent that tempted Eve, " My aunt — the renowned snake ; " and as Shelley translated and repeated passages of ^ Dyce (Rev. Alexander). Recollections of the Table-talk of Samuel Rogers. i2mo. London, 1856. ^ The exact time cannot be determined, but it must have been prior to 18 16. BYRON. 63 "Faust," — to, as he said, impregnate Byron's brain, — when he came to that passage, " My aunt, the renowned snake," Byron said, "Then you are her nephew," and henceforth he often called Shelley, the Snake ; his bright eyes, slim figure, and noise- less movements, strengthened, if it did not suggest, the comparison. Byron was the real snake — a dan- gerous mischief-maker ; his wit or humor might force a grim smile, or hollow laugh, from the stand- ers-by, but they savored more of pain than playful- ness, and made you dissatisfied with yourself and him. When I left his gloomy hall, and the echoes o*f the heavy iron- plated door died aw^ay, I could hardly refrain from shouting v/ith joy as I hurried along the broad-flagged terrace w^hich overhangs the pleasant river, cheered on my course by the cloudless sky, soft air, and fading light, which close an Italian day. — E, J. Trelawny (" Records of Shelley, Byron, etc."). As to friendship, it is a propensity in which my genius is very limited. I do not know the male hu- man being, except Lord Clare, the friend of my in- fancy, for whom I feel anything that deserves the name. ... I will do my duty by my intimates, upon the principle of doing as you would be done by. I have done so, I trust, in most instances. I may be pleased with their conversation — rejoice in their success — be glad to do them service, or to re- ceive their counsel and assistance in return. But as for friends and friendship, I have (as I already said) named the only remaining male for whom I feel anything of the kind, excepting, perhaps, Thomas ''The Snaked His own vie IV of frie7tdship. 64 BYRON. His oivn vieiv of friendskip. Gross vices. Knd of the latest scan- dal. Mental activity. Moore. I have had, and may still have, a thousand friends, as they are called, in life., who are like one's partners in the v/altz of this world — not much re- membered when the ball is over, though very pleas- ant for the time. — Lord Byron (quoted in Moore's '' Life of Byron "). In concluding this very unpleasant summary of Byron's bad qualities, the editor would remark that he has not deemed it necessary to soil these pages with illustrations of Byron's notorious immorality in his relations to women. The evidence in regard to this subject is authentic and voluminous, and is easily accessible to all who take an interest in such researches. Nor has it seemed needful to enter into any consideration of the last assault upon Byron's memory, an assault of which Mr. Nichol has well said ; '' Strangely enough, it is from the country of Washington, whom the poet was wont to reverence as the purest patriot of the modern world, that in 1869 there emanated the hideous story which scandalized both continents, and ulti- mately recoiled on the retailer of the scandal. The grounds of the reckless charge have been weighed by those who have wished it to prove false, and by those who have wished it to prove true, and found wanting." The charge having been met and re- futed, the whole noxious affair may well be con- sioned to oblivion. Almost every second day, while the Satire was printing, Mr. Dallas, who had undertaken to super- intend it through the press, received fresh matter BYRON. 65 for the enrichment of its pages, from the author, whose mind, once excited on any subject, knew no end to the outpourings of its wealth. In one of his short notes to Mr. Dallas, he says, "Print soon, or I shall overflow with rhyme ;" and it was, in the same manner, in all his subsequent publications, — as long, at least, as he remained within reach of the printer, — that he continued thus to feed the press, to the very last moment, with new and " thick-coming fancies," which the reperusal of what he had al- ready written suggested to him. It would almost seem, indeed, from the extreme facility and rapidity with which he produced some of his brightest pas- sages during the progress of his works through the press, that there was in the very act of printing an excitement to his fancy, and that the rush of his thoughts towards this outlet gave increased life and freshness to their flow. — T. Moore (" Life of Byron "). His memory is one of the most retentive I ever encountered, for he does not forget even trifling occurrences, or persons to whom, I believe, he feels a perfect indifference. ... It surprises me to witness the tenacity with which his memory re- tains every trivial occurrence connected with his sojourn in England and his London life. . . . For example, speaking of a mutual acquaintance, Byron said, ^' was the first man I saw wear pale lemon-colored gloves, and devilish well they looked."^ — Countess of Blessington (" Idler in Italy "). ^ Byron's memory retained better things than these. Those who knew him most intimately speak of his memory as something veiy remarkable. I.-S Mental activity^ Memory, 66 bykon: Politics. Scott believed that Byron's professions of liberal- ism were not the result of any deep conviction, but *'that the pleasure it afforded him as a vehicle of displaying his wit and satire against individuals in office was at the bottom of this habit of thinking." This view, however, does not seem tenable, for Byron confirmed his words by deeds. In 1820 he joined the secret society of the Carbonari and took an active part in the Italian insurrection ; and the last year of his life was devoted, at great personal sacrifices, to the cause of Greece. Mr, John Nich- ol, in his volume upon Byron, gives the following excellent summary of the poet's most significant words upon this subject : ** Byron regarded the established dynasties of the continent with a sincere hatred. He talks of the more than infernal tyranny of the House of Austria. To his fancy, as to Shelley's, New England is the star of the future. Attracted by a strength or rather force of character akin to his own, he worshipped Napoleon, even when driven to confess that 'the hero had sunk into a king.' He lamented his over- throw ;^ but, above all, that he was beaten by 'three stupid, legitimate old dynasty boobies of regular sovereigns.' ' I write in ipecacuanha that the Bour- bons are restored.' ' What right have we to pre- scribe laws to France ? Here we are retrograding to the dull, stupid old system, balance of Europe — ^ When he heard the news of Waterloo, he said, " I am d d sorry for it ! I didn't know but I might live to see Lord Castle- reagh's head on a pole. But I suppose I sha'n't now." This was heard by George Ticknor, who noted it in his journal. BYRON. 67 poising straws on lyings' noses, instead of wringing tliem off.' 'The king-times are fast finishing. There will be blood shed like water, and tears like mist ; but the peoples will conquer in the end. I shall not live to see it, but I foresee it.' * Give me a re- public. Look in the history of the earth — Rome, Greece, Venice, Holland, France, America, our too short Commonwealth — and compare it with what they did under masters.' " The author has had an opportunity of learning, from the very first authority, that the importance of Lord Byron's life to the Greek cause was even greater than he had ventured to suppose it. His w4iole influence was turned to the best and wisest purposes ; and most singular it was to behold an individual, certainly not remarkable for prudence in his own private affairs, direct with the utmost sagacity the course to be pursued by a great nation, involved in a situation of extraordinary dif- ficulty. It seems as if his keen and hasty temper was tamed by the importance of the task which he had undertaken. . . . His advice and control were constantly exerted to reconcile the indepen- dent and jarring chiefs with each other, to in- duce them to lay aside jealousies, feuds, and the miserable policy of seeking each some individual advantage ; and to determine them to employ their united means against the common enemy. It was his constant care to postpone the consideration of disputes upon speculative political maxims, and di- rect every effort to the recovery of national inde- pendence, without which no form of government Politics, Rxecutive ability tit Greece. 68 BYRON. Courage. Fit7)orable estivtates of his character. could be realized. Lord Byron")/ -Sir Walter Scott (*' Death of Moore gives the testimony of many witnesses to Byron's courage. Colonel Stanhope, who was with him in Greece, tells of a convulsive fit which nearly ended the poet's life, and how he was bled by the surgeons till he fainted. He continues, *' Soon after his dreadful paroxysm, when he was lying on his sick-bed, with his whole nervous system completely shaken, the mutinous Suliotes, covered with dirt and splendid attires, broke into his apart- ment, brandishing their costly arms and loudly de- manding their rights. Lord Byron, electrified by this unexpected act, seemed to recover from his sickness ; and the more the Suliotes raged the more his calm courage triumphed. The scene was truly sublime." What I liked about him, besides his boundless genius, was his generosity of spirit "^ as well as of purse, and his utter contempt of all the affectations of literature. He liked Moore and me because, with ' Scott (Sir Walter). Miscellaneous Prose Works. 7vols., 8vo. Baudry, Paris, 1837. ' One of the most pleasant instances of practical kindliness on Byron's part, appears in a letter which he wrote to Moore, in 18 15. He says : ** By the way, if poor Coleridge — who is a man of wonderful talent, and in distress, and about to pubhsh two volumes of Poesy and Biography, and who has been worse used by the critics than ever we were — will you if he comes out, promise me to review him favorably in the Edinburgh Review?''^. BYROA'. 69 all our other differences, we were both good-natured fellows, not caring to maintain our dignity, enjoy- ing the jnot pottr rire. — Sir Walter Scott (quoted in Moore's " Life of Byron "). Upon the occasion of Byron's death, Sir Walter Scott wrote an obituary notice, which was published in the Edinburgh Weekly Journal, and was afterwards reprinted in Scott's miscellaneous works. In the course of this article Scott said : " No man had ever a kinder heart for sympathy, or a more open hand for the relief of distress ; and no mind was ever more formed for the enthusiastic admiration of noble actions, providing he was convinced that the actors had proceeded on disinterested principles. Lord Byron was totally free from the curse and deg- radation of literature — its jealousies, we mean, and its envy." What do I know of Lord Byron ? . . . Per- sonally I know nothing but good of him. . . . When I was in the habit of familiarly seeing him,^ he was kindness itself. At a time when Coleridge was in great embarrassment, Rogers, when calling on Byron, chanced to mention it. He immediately went to his writing-desk, and brought back a check for a hundred pounds, and insisted on its being for- warded to Coleridge. ** I did not like takmg it," said Rogers, who told me the story, "for I knew that he was in want of it himself." His servants he treated with a gentle consideration for their feelings * Before his departure from England. Favorable cstiutntes of his character. Scotfs notice of his death. The eulogies of personal friends. 70 BYRON. The eulogies of personal friends. which I have seldom witnessed in any other, and they were devoted to him. At Newstead there v/as an old man who had been butler to his mother, and I have seen Byron, as the old man waited behind his chair at dinner, pour out a glass of wine and pass it to him when he thought we were too much engaged in conversation to observe what he was doing. The transaction was a thing of custom ; and both parties seemed to flatter themselves that it was clandestinely affected. A hideous old wom- an, who had been brought in to nurse him when he was unwell at one of his lodgings, and whom few would have cared to have retained about them longer than her services were required, was carried with him, in improved attire, to his cham- bers in the Albany, and was seen, after his marriage, gorgeous in black silk, at his house in Piccadilly. She had done him a service and he could not forget it. Of his attachment to his friends, no one can read Moore's life, and have a doubt. ... I have never yet heard anybody complain that Byron had once appeared to entertain a regard for him, and had afterward capriciously cast him off. — William Harness (L'Estrange's " Life of Harness "). The memoir of Hodgson ^ bears emphatic witness to the warmth and steadfastness of Hodgson's re- gard for Byron. It also records many kindly and generous acts on Byron's part, and contains a cor- respondence between Lady Augusta Leigh and ' Hodgson (Rev. James T.). Memoir of the Rev. Francis Hodg- son. 2 vols., crown 8vo. London, 1878. BYRON. 71 Hodgson, which is of considerable value as a con- tribution to our knowledge of Byron's married life. John Cam Hobhouse (Lord Broughton) was another of Byron's personal friends who remained constant to him throughout his life, and was one of his warmest defenders. Of any partiality, . . . beyond what our mutual friendship accounts for and justifies, I am by no means conscious ; nor would it be in the power, indeed, of even- the most partial friend to allege anything more convincingly favorable of his character than is contained in the few simple facts with which I shall here conclude, that, through life, with all his faults, he never lost a friend ;— that those about him in his youth, whether as compan- ions, teachers, or servants, remained attached to him to the last ; — that the woman, to v/hom he gave the love of his maturer years, idolizes his name ; and that, with a single unhappy exception, scarce an instance is to be found of any one, once brought, however briefly, into relations of amity with him, that did not feel toward him a kind regard in life, and retain a fondness for his memory. — T. Moore ('VLife of Byron "). The eulogiei of persufial friends. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY, I792-1822. INTRODUCTORY NOTE. THERE are two works of pre-eminent value to the student of Shelley's life and character. These are Thomas Jefferson Hogg's " Life of Shelley" and the " Recollections " of Edward John Trelawny. Two volumes of Hogg's book were published in 1858, but the work was never finished. Shelley's family became alarmed by the manner in which Hogg was working, and withdrew the letters and records which they had intrusted to him. We may well be thankful that he was able to publish these two volumes ; for, fragmentary as it is, Hogg's book is invaluable. Rough and caustic, it yet gives us many facts of Shelley's early years, and many illus- trations of his complex character, which we find nowhere else. Trelawny'swork shows us the Shelley of a later period. The latest edition is that of 1878, entitled " Records of Shelley, Byron, and the Author." It is interesting to know that Trelawny approved of Hogg's work. W. M. Rossetti wrote in his diary, March 11, 1870, *' Trelawny is now reading with extreme delight Hogg's ' Life of Shelley ' (hitherto unread by him) : he considers Hogg's view of the poet to be thoroughly consistent 7^ PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. with his own later experience " ("Talks with Tre- lawny," AthencEum^ July 15, 1882). The following works are also worthy of attention : '' Shelley Memorials," edited by Lady Shelley, the poet's daughter-in-law ; Medwin's " Life of Shelley ;" the careful and detailed memoir by W. M. Rossetti, prefixed to his edition of Shelley's poems ; D. F. McCarthy's " Shelley's Early Life ; " Richard Gar- nett's "Relics of Shelley;" and the various edi- tions of Shelley's works. In Frasers Magazine, 1858 and i860, there are articles upon Shelley by T. L. Peacock ; there are articles by R. Garnett in Mac- 7nillans Magazine, June, i860, and in the Fort- nightly Review, June, 1878 ; see also an article by Thornton Hunt, in the Atlantic Monthly, February, 1863. Incidental mention of Shelley, containing much that is valuable, may be found in Southey's "Correspondence with Caroline Bowles;" Leigh Hunt's "Autobiography," and the same author's " Lord Byron and Some of his Contemporaries ;" Charles and Mary Cowden Clarke's " Recollections of Writers;" Moore's "Life of Byron;" R. H. Gronow's "Celebrities of London and Paris;" Henry Crabb Robinson's "Diary ; " and a series of anonymous articles (which have been attributed to Barry Cornwall), entitled " A Graybeard's Gossip," in the New Monthly Magazine, 1847. In 1859 Lady Shelley declared that the Shelley family were in possession of facts and documents which would vindicate Shelley's character in regard to his separation from his first wife, and his elope- ment with Mary Godwin. Lady Shelley promised that these facts should be made public at some fu- PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 77 ture time, and in the latest edition of her *' Shelley Memorials" (1874) she repeated the promise ; but it still remains unfulfilled/ The time, therefore, is not yet ripe for a reconsideration of this painful epi- sode. In the chronological table of the leading events of Shelley's life (p. 79) will be found those facts, and only those facts, upon which all parties agree. To attempt more than this would be im- practicable in the present work. Those who wish to study the subject will find matter for much be- wilderment in the volumes already cited. Those who best knew Shelley speak of him w^ith a warmth which seems extravagant. It is a signifi- cant fact that men of the most opposite characters, men who differed widely in their theories of life and in their modes of conduct, unite in expressions of enthusiastic devotion to their common friend. Byron, Leigh Hunt, Trelawny, Hogg — men hav- ing but little in common — say that this was the best and most lovable man they ever knew. Such testi- mony cannot be lightly put aside, and may fairly be opposed to the vehemence of Shelley's detractors. ^ One of the latest contributions to the Shelleyan literature is an article entitled " Shelley and Mary," in the Edinburgh Review^ October, 1882. This article is based upon "A collection of let- ters and documents of a biographical character in the possession of Sir Percy and Lady Shelley, for private circulation only. 3 vols., 8vo. 1882." It is peculiarly valuable to the student of Shelley's life and character, and throws new light upon many incidents. It adds but little, however, to the former sum of knowledge concern- ing Shelley's separation from his wife, Harriet, and cannot be ac- cepted as a fulfilment of Lady Shelley's promise ; since it gives us no new facts, of material importance, in regard to the subject which has occasioned so much dispute. 78 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY, In his lifetime, whatever his sins, Shelley was very badly treated. His course of life was generally, in some way or other, in open conflict with the usages and dicta of society ; and society is prompt to re- sent opposition of this kind, in whatever form it manifests itself. Accordingly, in behalf of British respectability, the pack of critics snarled and snapped at Shelley, with varying degrees of igno- rance and malevolence. But, passing by these ephemeral things, which have ceased to have any importance save as matters of literary curiosity, there are other judgments more worthy of atten- tion. There is a wide difference of opinion about Shelley, between men whose w^ords are entitled to respect, and it is interesting to observe the extreme points of this difference, as shown by two writers, Thomas Carlyle and William Michael Rossetti. Rossetti says : '' He asks for no suppressions, he needs none, and from me he gets none. After everything has been stated, we find that the man Shelley was worthy to be the poet Shelley, and praise cannot reach higher than that ; we find him to call forth the most eager and fervent homage, and to be one of the ultimate glories of our race and planet." ^ Carlyle says : '* To me poor Shelley always was, and is, a kind of ghastly object, color- less, pallid, without health, or warmth, or vigor ; the sound of him shrieky, frosty, as if a ghost were trying to sing to us ; the temperament of him spas- * Rossetti (William Michael). Poetical Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. With Notes and a Memoir. 3 vols., i2mo. London, 1878. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 79 modic, hysterical, instead of strong or robust ; with fine affections and aspirations, gone all such a road : a man infinitely too weak for that solitary scaling of the Alps, which he undertook in spite of all the world." ' LEADING EVENTS OF SHELLEY'S LIFE. 1792. Bom August 4th, at Field Place, near Hor- sham, Sussex. 1805. — (Aged 13.) A scholar at Eton. 1810. — (Aged 17-18.) Publishes his first work, "Zastrozzi," a novel, in June. Goes to Oxford Univer- sity in October. 1811. — (Aged 18-19.) Expelled from Oxford in March. Runs away to Edinburgh with Miss Harriet Westbrook, and marries her, in Septem- ber. 1812. — (Aged 19-20.) A political agitator in Ireland. 1813.— (Aged 21.) Publishes "Queen Mab," 2 1814. — (Aged 21-22.) Remarries his wife, Harriet, March 24th. Elopes vnth Mary W. Godwin, July 28th, and takes her and her sister, Jane Clair- mont, to Switzerland. They return to England in September. 1815. — (Aged 23.) His grandfather dies, and he becomes heir to the family estates. In England, living with Mary W. Godwin. 1816. — (Aged 23-24.) Publishes "Alastor." Revisits Switzerland with Mary W. Godwin and Jane Clair- mont in May, and meets Byron for the first time, at Geneva. Returns to Eng- ' Carlyle (Thomas). Reminiscences. Edited by J. A. Froude. 8vo. London and New York, 1881. ' This was a private issue of two hundred and fifty copies, which were distributed gratuitously. This issue was pirated, and the poem was republished, against Shelley's protest, in 1821. 80 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. land in September. His wife, Harriet, commits suicide in November. (?) He maiTies Mary W. Godwin in December. 1817. — (Aged 25.) Lord Chancellor Eldon deprives him of his son and daughter, the children of his first marriage. He lives at Great Marlow with his second wife. 1818.— (Aged 26.) Publishes " The Revolt of Islam," which, under the title " Laon and Cythna," had been published in the preceding year. Goes to Italy with his wife. 1819. — (Aged 27). Publishes "The Cenci," at Leghorn. 1820. — (Aged 28.) Publishes "Prometheus Unbound." Living at Pisa. 1821. — (Aged 29.) Publishes "Adonais," and Epipsychidion. 1822. — (Aged 29 years, 11 months.) Drowned, in the Bay of Spezia, July 8th. o^ ^^^ PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. THE most authentic records of Shelley's child- hood are contained in some letters written by his sister. The following extracts have been made from these letters, as printed in Hogg's " Life of Shelley." ' "At this distant period I can scarcely remember my Jirst impressions of Bysshe, but he would fre- quently come to the nursery and was full of a pe- culiar kind of pranks. One piece of mischief, for which he was rebuked, was running a stick through the ceiling of a low passage to find some new chamber, which could be made effective for some flights of his vivid imagination. The tales, to which we have sat and listened, evening after evening, seated on his knee, w^hen we came to the dining- room for dessert, were anticipated with that pleasing dread, which so excites the minds of children, and fastens so strongly and indelibly on the memory. There was a spacious garret under the roof of Field Place, and a room, which had been closed for years, excepting an entrance made by the removal of a board in the garret floor. This unknown land was ' Hogg (Thomas Jefferson). Life of Shelley. Vols. i-2, 8vo. London, 1858. {Ahver completed.^ L— 6 His child- hood, de- scribed by his sister. 82 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. His child- hood, de- scribed by his sister. made the abode of an alchemist, old and gray, with a long beard. . . . We were to go and see him some day ; but we Avere content to wait, and a cave was to be dug in the orchard for the better accom- modation of this Cornelius Agrippa. Another fa- vorite theme was the ' Great Tortoise,' that lived in Warnham Pond ; and any unwonted noise was accounted for by the presence of this great beast, which was made into the fanciful proportions most adapted to excite awe and w^onder. '' Bysshe was certainly fond of eccentric amuse- ments, but they delighted us, as children, quite as much as if our minds had been naturally attuned to the same tastes ; for we dressed ourselves in strange costumes to personate spirits, or fiends, and Bysshe would take a fire-stove and fill it wnth some inflamma- ble liquid, and carry it flaming into the kitchen and to the back-door. . . . When my brother com- menced his studies in chemistry, and practised elec- tricity upon us, I confess my pleasure in it was en- tirely negatived by terror at its eifects. **He was, at a later period, in the habit of walk- ing out at night. . . . The old servant of the family would follow him, and say, that ' Master Bysshe only took a walk, and came back again.' He was full of cheerful fun, and had all the comic vein so agreeable in a household. " I remember well how he used to sing to us ; he could not bear any turns or twists in music, but liked a tune played quite simply. . . . His good temper was a pleasant memory always, and I do not recollect an instance of the reverse towards any of us." PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 83 Mrs. Shelley, the poet's second wife, is quoted as follows in Hogg's ''Life of Shelley:" "Amongst his other self-sought studies, he was passionately attached to the study of what used to be called the occult sciences, conjointly with that of the new won- ders, which chemistry and natural philosophy have displayed to us. His pocket-money was spent in the purchase of books relative to these darling pur- suits, — of chemical apparatus and materials. . . . Sometimes he watched the livelong night for ghosts. At his father's house, where his influence was, of course, great among the dependants, he even planned how he might get admission to the vault, or charnel-house, at Warnham Church, and might sit there all night, harrowed by fear, yet trembling with expectation, to see one of the spiritualized owners of the bones piled around him." In the year 1809 ^ an incident occurred at Eton which caused no small sensation and merriment throughout the school. It was announced one morning that Shelley, the future poet, had actually accepted wager of battle from Sir Thomas Styles. Whether he had received an insult, and that vast dis- proportion in size gave him confidence, or that over- full of the warlike descriptions of Homer's heroes, he was forced to imitate their exploits against some one or other, remains a secret. Meet, however, they did, after twelve, in the playing-field. The usual pre- liminaries were arranged — a ring was formed, sec- onds and bottle-holders were all in readiness, and ^ When Shelley was about seventeen years old. Mary Skel- leysaccowit of his child- hood. AJight at Kton. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. AJt&-ht at Rton. the combatants stood face to face. The tall lank figure of the poet towered above the diminutive, thickset little baronet by nearly a head or so. In the first round no mischief was done ; Sir Thomas seemed to be feeling his way, being naturally desi- rous of ascertaining what his gigantic adversary was made of ; and Shelley, though brandishing his long arms, had evidently no idea of their use in a pugi- listic point of view. After a certain amount of spar- ring without effect, the combatants were invited by their seconds to take breath. The baronet did not hesitate to accept the offer to sit upon the knee of his second ; but Shelley disdainfully declined to rest, and calculating upon finishing the fight by a single blow, stalked round the ring, looking defiance at his little adversary. Time was called, and the battle was renewed in earnest. The baronet, somewhat cautious, planted his first blow upon the chest of Shelley, who did not appear to relish it. However, though not a proficient in the art of self-defence, he nevertheless went in, and knocked the little baronet off his legs, who lay sprawling upon the grass, more dead than alive. Shelley's confidence increased ; he stalked round the ring as before, and spouted one of the defiant addresses usual with Homer's heroes when about to commence a single combat : the young poet, being a first-rate classical scholar, actually de- livered the speech in the original Greek, to the no small amusement of the boys. In the third and last round Styles went to work like a first-rate artist, and, after several slighter blows, delivered what is called in the prize ring ''a heavy slogger " on Shelley's PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 85 bread-basket ; this seemed positively to electrify the bard, for, I blush to say, he broke through the ring, and took to his heels with a speed that defied pur- suit. His seconds, backers, and all who had wit- nessed the fight, joined in full cry after him, but he outran them all, and got safe to the house of his tutor, Mr. Bethel. . . . Shelley never more dur- ing his stay . . . ventured to enter the pugi- listic arena. — R. H. Gronow (" Celebrities of Lon- don and Paris'').^ He passed among his schoolfellows as a strange and unsocial being, for when a holiday relieved us from our tasks, and the other boys were engaged in such sports as the narrow circuit of our prison- court allowed, Shelley, v^^ho entered into none of them, would pace backwards and forwards along the southern wall. — Thomas Medwin ('^ Life of Shelley").' In his ''Life of Shelley," Hogg inserts a letter from Walter S. Halliday, from which the following extract has been made : " Many a long and happy walk have I had w^ith him in the beautiful neigh- borhood of dear old Eton. We used to wander for hours about Clewer, Frogmore, the Park at Wind- sor, the Terrace ; and I was a delighted and willing listener to his marvellous stories of fairy-land, and apparitions, and spirits, and haunted ground ; and ' Gronow (Rees Howell). Celebrities of London and Paris. i6mo. London, 1865. - Medwin (Thomas). The Life of Percy Bysshe Shelley. 2 vols., l2mo. London, 1847. A fight at Kton. School- days at Eton. RccoUec- tions of a. school-fel- loiv. 86 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Recollec- tions of a schooi-fel- loiv. Personal aj>pearance. his speculations were then (for his mind was far more developed than mine) of the world beyond the grave. ... I v/as myself too young to form any estimate of character, but I loved Shelley for his kindliness and affectionate ways : he was not made to endure the rough and boisterous pastime at Eton, and his shy and gentle nature was glad to escape far away to muse over strange fancies, for his mind was reflective and teeming with deep thought. His lessons were child's play to him, and his power of Latin versification marvellous. I think I remember some long work he had even then commenced, but I never saw it. He had great moral courage, and feared nothing, but what was base, and false, and low. He never joined in the usual sports of the boys, and, what is remark- able, never went out in a boat on the river." ' Shelley was at this time tall for his age,'* slightly and delicately built, and rather narrow-chested, with a complexion fair and ruddy, a face rather long than oval. His features, not regularly hand- some, were set off by a profusion of silky brown hair, that curled naturally. The expression of countenance was one of exceeding sweetness and innocence. His blue eyes were very large and prominent. . . . They were at times, when he was abstracted, as he often was in contemplation, dull, and, as it were, insensible to external objects ; at others they flashed with the fire of intelligence. » See p. g8. 2 Ten years. Medwin was one of his school-mates at this time. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 87 . . . He was naturally calm, but when he heard of or read of some flagrant act of injustice, oppres- sion, or cruelty, then indeed the sharpest marks of horror and indignation were visible in his counte- nance. — Thomas Medwin ('' Life of Shelley"). His figure was slight and fragile, and yet his bones and joints were large and strong. He w^as tall, but he stooped so much, that he seemed of low stature. His clothes were expensive, and made ac- cording to the most approved mode of the day ; but they were tumbled, rumpled, and unbrushed. His gestures were abrupt, and sometimes violent, occa- sionally even awkward, yet more frequently gentle and graceful. His complexion w^as delicate, and al- most feminine, of the purest red and white ; yet he was tanned and freckled by exposure to the sun, having passed the autumn, as he said, in shooting. His features, his whole face, and particularly his head, were, in fact, unusually small ; yet the last appeared oi remarkable bulk, for his hair was long and bushy, and in fits of absence, and in the agonies (if I may use the w^ord) of anxious thought, he often rubbed it fiercely with his hands, or passed his fin- gers quickly through his locks unconsciously, so that it was singularly wild and rough. In times when it was customary to imitate stage-coachmen as closely as possible in costume, and when the hair w^as invariably cropped, like that of our soldiers, this eccentricity was very striking. His features were not symmetrical (the mouth, perhaps, excepted), yet was the effect of the whole extremely powerful. They breathed an animation, Personal appearance. 88 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Personal af>peara7ice. Voice. a fire, an enthusiasm, a vivid and preternatural in- telligence, that I never met with in any other coun- tenance. Nor was the moral expression less beau- tiful than the intellectual ; for there was a softness, a delicacy, a gentleness, and especially (though this will surprise many) that air of profound religious veneration, that characterizes the best works, and chiefly the frescoes (and into these they infused their whole souls), of the great masters of Florence and of Rome. I recognized the very peculiar expres- sion in these wonderful productions long afterward, and with a satisfaction mingled with much sorrow, for it was after the decease of him in whose counte- nance I had first observed it. — T. J. Hogg (''Life of Shelley "). I beheld ' a fair, freckled, blue-eyed, light-haired, delicate-looking person, whose countenance was serious and thoughtful ; whose stature would have been rather tall had he carried himself upright ; whose earnest voice, though never loud, was some- what unmusical. Manifest as it was that his pre- occupied mind had no thought to spare for the mo- dish adjustment of his fashionably made clothes, it was impossible to doubt, even for a moment, that you were gazing upon a gentleman.^ ..." Never did a more finished gentleman than Shelley step across a drawing-room," was the remark of Lord 1 In 1816. 2 Thomas Medwin says, in his " Life of Shelley : " " Shelley was a man of the nicest habits, — the most scrupulous nicety in his per- son ; invariably, whatever might be his occupation, making his toi- let for dinner." PERCY BY S SHE SHELLEY. 89 Byron. — Anonymous (" A Graybeard's Gossip," Neiv Monthly Magazine, 1847). Shelley, when he died, was in his thirtieth year. His figure was tall and slight, and his constitution consumptive. He was subject to violent spasmodic pains, which would sometimes force him to lie on the ground till they were over ; but he had always a kind word to give to those about him, when his pangs allowed him to speak. . . . Though well- turned, his shoulders were bent a little, owing to premature thought and trouble. The same causes had touched his hair with gray ; and though his habits of temperance and exercise gave him a re- markable degree of strength, it is not supposed that he could have lived many years. . . . His eyes were large and animated, with a dash of wildness in them ; his face small, but well-shaped, especially the mouth and chin, the turn of which was very sensitive and graceful. His complexion was natu- rally fair and delicate, with a color in the cheeks. He had brown hair, which, though tinged with gray, surmounted his face well, being in consider- able quantity, and tending to a curl. His side- face upon the whole was deficient in strength, and his features would not have told well in a bust ; but when fronting and looking at you attentively, his aspect had a certain seraphical character that would have suited John the Baptist, or the angel whom Milton describes as holding a reed "tiptwith fire." — Leigh Hunt ("Autobiography").^ ^ Hunt (James Henry Leigh). Autobiography and Reminis- cences. 3 vols., i6mo. London, 1850. Personal aJ>J>earance 90 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Personal '.;ppearance. Shelley was talland slight of figure, with a sin- gular union of general delicacy of organization and muscular strength. His hair w^as brown, prema- turely touched w^ith gray ; his complexion fair and glowing ; his eyes gray and extremely vivid ; his face small and delicately featured, especially about the lower part ; and he had an expression of coun- tenance, when he was talking in his usual earnest fashion, giving you the idea of something " seraph- ical."— Leigh Hunt (from a letter quoted by S. C. Hall in his '' Book of Memories "). His face was round, flat, pale, with small feat- ures ; mouth beautifully shaped ; hair bright brown and wavy ; and such a pair of eyes as are rarely in the human or any other head, — intensely blue, with a gentle and lambent expression, yet w^onderfully alert and engrossing ; nothing appeared to escape his knowledge. . . . Shelley's figure was a little above the middle height, slender, and of delicate construction, which appeared the rather from a lounging or waving manner in his gait, as though his frame was compounded barely of muscle and tendon ; and that the power of walking was an achievement with him, and not a natural habit. — Charles Cowden Clarke (''Recollections").* He still (1818) had that ultra-youthful figure that partook the traits of the hobbledehoy, arrived at man's stature, but not yet possessing the full manly 4 1 Clarke (Charles Cowden and Mary Cowden). Recollections of Writers. i2mo. London and New York, 1C78. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 91 proportions. His extremities were large, his limbs long, his face small, and his thorax very partially developed, especially in girth. In habitual eager- ness of mood, thrusting forward his face, made him stoop, with sunken chest and rounded shoulders. . . But in his countenance there was life in- stead of weariness ; melancholy more often yielded to alternations of bright thoughts ; and paleness had given way to a certain freshness of color, with something like roses in the cheeks. — Thornton Hunt {Atla?itic Monthly^ February, 1863). His features were small — the upper part of his face not strictly regular — the eyes unusually promi- nent, too much so for beauty. His mouth was moulded after the finest modelling of Greek art, and wore an habitual expression of benevolence, and when he smiled, his smile irradiated his w^hole countenance. His hands were thin, and expressed feeling to the finger's ends ; . . , his hair, pro- fuse, silken, and naturally curling, was at a very early period interspersed with gray. . . . He did not look so tall as he was, being nearly five feet eleven, for his shoulders were a little bent by study, . . . owing to his being near-sighted, and lean- ing over his books, and which increased the nar- rowness of his chest. — Thomas Medwin (" Life of Shelley "). In 1880 an interview with E. J. Treiawny was published in the Whitehall Review (London). He is reported to have spoken of Shelley's appearance as follows : Personal appearance. 92 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Personal aJ>J>earajice. Dress. " ' What, ' he growled, ' is all that rubbish that Symonds writes about Shelley being too beautiful to paint ? Too beautiful to paint, indeed ! When he was quite young he might have had the beauty that we admire in children or young girls, but he had no manly beauty. He was narrow-chested and he stooped like a scholar. You could see that from a child, almost a baby, he had been bending over books. He had the smallest head of any man I ever knew ; Byron's came next. His eyes were slightly prominent, and there was hardly any of the white visible. To see him in a crowd was like see- ing a stag in the midst of a herd of deer. The deer has a timid way of looking on the ground, but the stag walks with lifted head and shining eyes. His were like stars.' " ' I never remiCmber to have seen Bysshe in a great- coat or cloak, even in the coldest weather. He wore his waistcoat much or entirely open. . . Unless he was compelled to cover it by main force, he had his throat bare ; the neckcloth being cast aside, lost, over the hills and far away, and the collar of his shirt unbuttoned. In the street or road he reluctantly wore a hat, but in fields and gar- dens his little round head had no other covering than his long, wild, ragged locks. — T. J. Hogg ("Life of Shelley"). The real man was reconcilable with all these de- ^ Another description of Shelley's appearance, by Trelawny, will be found upon p. 133. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 93 scriptions.' His traits suggested everything that has been said of him ; but his aspect, conformation, and personal qualities contained more than- any one has ascribed to him, and more indeed than all put together. A few plain matters-of-fact will make this intelligible. Shelley was a tall man, — nearly, if not quite, five feet ten in height. He was pecul- iarly slender, and . . . his chest had palpably enlarged after the usual growing period. He retained the same kind of straitness in the per- pendicular outline on each side of him ; his shoul- ders were the reverse of broad, but yet they were not sloping, and a certain squareness in them was naturally incompatible with anything feminine in his appearance. To his last days he still suffered his chest to collapse ; but it was less a stoop than a peculiar mode of holding the head and shoulders, — the face thrown a little forward, and the shoulders slightly elevated ; though the whole attitude below the shoulders, when standing, was unusually up- right, and had the appearance of litheness and ac- tivity. . . . He had an oval face and delicate features, not unlike those given to him in the well- known miniature. His forehead was high. His fine, dark brown hair, when not cut close, disposed itself in playful and very beautiful curls over his brows and round the back of his neck. He had brown eyes, Hvith a color in his cheek ''like a girl's;" ' The writer is commenting upon the various accounts of Shel- ley's personal appearance. ^ Leigh Hunt says that Shelley's eyes were gray ; all the other authorities say that they were blue. Analysis of the -various accounts of his personal appearance. 94 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Analysis of the 7>arious accounts of h is personal appearance. Voice. but as he grew older, his complexion bronzed. So far the reality agrees with the current descriptions ; nevertheless they omit material facts. The outline of the features and face possessed a firmness and hardness entirely inconsistent with a feminine char- acter. The outline was sharp and firm ; the mark- ings distinct, and indicating an energetic physique. The outline of the bone was distinctly perceptible at the temples, on the bridge of the nose, at the back portion of the cheeks, and in the jaw, and the artist could trace the principal muscles of the face. The beard, also, although the reverse of strong, w^as clearly marked, especially about the chin. Thus, although the general aspect was peculiarly slight, youthful, and delicate, yet, when you looked to "the points" of the animal, you saw Avell enough the in- dications of a masculine vigor, in many respects far above the average. And what I say of the physical aspect of course bears upon the countenance. That changed with every feeling. It usually looked ear- nest, — when joyful, was singularly bright and ani- mated, like that of a gay young girl, — when sad- dened, had an aspect of sorrow peculiarly touching, and sometimes it fell into a listless weariness still more mournful ; but for the most part there was a look of active movement, promptitude, vigor, and decision, which bespoke a manly, and even a com- manding character. — Thornton Hunt {Atlantic Monthly, February, 1863). There was one physical blemish that threatened to neutralize all his excellence. " This is a fine, clever fellow," I said to myself, " but I can never PERCY BYSSIIE SHELLEY. 95 The weakness ascribed to Shelley's voice was . . . taken from exceptional instances, and the account of it usually suggests the idea that he spoke in a falsetto which might almost be mistaken for the "shriek" of a harsh-toned woman. Noth- ing could be more unlike the reality. The voice was indeed quite peculiar, and I do not know where any parallel to it is likely to be found unless in Lancashire. . . . His speaking voice unques- tionably was that of a high natural counter-tenor. I should say that he usually spoke at a pitch some- where about the D natural above the base line ; but it was in no respect a falsetto. It was a natural chest-voice, not powerful, but telling, musical, and expressive. In reading aloud the strain was pecul- iarly clear, and had a sustained, song-like quality, which came out more strongly when, as he often did, he recited verse. When he called out in pain, — a very rare occurrence, — or sometimes in comic playfulness, you might hear the " shrillness " of which people talk ; but it was only because the organ was forced beyond the ordinary effort. His usual speech was clear, and yet with a breath in it, with an especially distinct articulation, a soft, vi- Voice, bear his society ; I shall never be able to endure his voice ; it would kill me. What a pity it is ! " I am very sensible of imperfections, and especially of painful sounds, — and the voice of the stranger was excruciating ; it was intolerably shrill, harsh, and discordant ; of the most cruel intension, — it was perpetual and without any remission, — it excori- ated the ears. — T. J. Hogg (" Life of Shelley "). 96 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Voice. No ear for music. brating tone, emphatic, pleasant, and persuasive. — Thornton ^-\5^t {Atlantic Monthly .^ February, 1863). In the interview referred to on a preceding page Trelawny said, in reply to a question about Shel- ley's voice : '' Of course all the Shelley biographers must go on repeating Hogg's assertion about the harsh shrillness of the poet's tones. No doubt he was habitually hoarse in this climate. You always find that Italians lose their voice on coming to England, while that of the English gets sweeter in Italy. Shelley's voice was soft and pleasant — at any rate when I knew him." W. M. Rossetti, in his "Talks with Trelawny," published in The Athenceum^ July 15, 1882, says, " Trelawny had not an unpleasant impression of Shelley's voice, save when he was ex- cited, and then it turned shrieky ; as on one occa- sion when Shelley came in much perturbed, from an interview with Byron, and screeched, ' By God, he's no better than a Christian ! ' " It is difficult to know what to think about this mat- ter. The authorities differ materially. Medwin says, in his " Life of Shelley," " His voice was soft and low, but broken in its tones, — when anything much interested him, harsh and immodulated ; and this peculiarity he never lost." R. H. Gronow, who was a school-fellow of Shelley's at Eton, speaks of his high, shrill voice. Leigh Hunt, who knew him well, says, ''His voice was high and weak." Shelley had no ear for music, — the words that he wrote for existing airs being, strangely enough, in- PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 97 appropriate in rhythm and even in cadence ; and al- though he had a manifest relish for music and often talked of it, I do not remember that I ever heard him sing even the briefest snatch/ — Thornton Hunt {Atlantic Monthly^ February, 1863). Notwithstanding the sense of weakness in the chest, which attacked him on any sudden effort, his power of exertion was considerable. Once, return- ing from a long excursion, and entering the house by the back way, up a precipitous, though not per- pendicular bank, the women of the party had to be helped ; and Shelley was the most active in render- ing that assistance. While others were content to accomplish the feat for one, he, I think, helped three up the bank, sliding in a half-sitting posture when he returned to fetch a new charge. I well remem- ber his shooting past me in a cloud of chalk dust, as I was slowly climbing up. ... I can also recollect that although he frequently preferred to steer rather than to put forth his strength, yet if it were necessary, he would take an oar, and could stick to his seat for any time against any force of current or of wind, not only without complaining, but without being compelled to give in until the set task was accomplished, though it should involve some miles of hard pulling. These facts indicate the amount of "grit" that lay under the outward appearance of weakness and excitable nerves. — Thornton Hunt (Atlantic Monthly^ February, 1863). He told me the greatest delight he experienced at ' Yet his sister speaks of his singing. See p. 82. 1—7 No ear for music. Physical strength. 98 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Boating. Grace and wivkivard- tiess. Eton was from boating, for which he had . . , early acquired a taste. I was present at a regatta in which he assisted, in 1809, and seemed to enjoy with great zest.^ A wherry was his beau ideal of happiness. ... A boat was to Shelley, what a plaything is to a child. . . . He was nine- teen when he used to float paper flotillas at Oxford. . . . He crossed the Channel to Calais in an open boat, a rash experiment. . . . He descended the Rhine on a sort of raft. — Thomas Medwin ("Life of Shelley"). Among the innumerable contradictions in the character and deportment of the youthful poet was a strange mixture of a singular grace, which mani- fested itself in his actions and gestures, with an oc- casional awkwardness almost as remarkable. . . . Shelley came tumbling upstairs, with a mighty sound, treading upon his nose, as I accused him of doing, rushed into the room, and throwing off his neckcloth, according to custom, stood staring around for some moments, as wondering why he had been in such a hurry. — T. J. Hogg (''Life of Shelley"). He would stumble in stepping across the floor of a drawing-room, he would trip himself up on a smooth-shaven grass-plot, and he would tumble in the most inconceivable manner in ascending the commodious, facile, and well-carpeted staircase of an elegant mansion ; ... on the contrary, he ^ W. S. Halliday, who was at Eton with Shelley, says that he never went out on the river. But there is abundant evidence to show that in later years he was passionately fond of boating. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 99 Grace and anvkwardM ness. would often glide without collision through a crowd- ed assembly, thread with unerring dexterity a most intricate path, or securely and rapidly tread the most arduous and uncertain ways. — T. J. Hogg ("Life of Shelley"). His letters inform us, that he had occasionally a vegeta- restricted himself m great measure, if not entirely, i stimulants. 11,. T • T 1 Tobacco. to a vegetable diet. ... It was not until the spring of 1813 that he entered upon a full and ex- act course of vegetable diet. . . . His nutri- ment had ever been, and always was, simple, con- sisting . . . principally of bread eaten by itself or with some very slight or frugal condiment. Spirituous liquors he never tasted ; beer rarely. He never called for, purchased, or drew, wine for his own drinking ; but if it came in his way, and the company was not disagreeable to him, he would sit at table awhile after dinner, and take two or three glasses of any white wine, uniformly selecting the weakest.— T. J. Hogg ("Life of Shelley"). Shelley, says Trelawny, never smoked, but toler- ated any amount of smoking in Trelawny himself or others. — W. M. Rossetti (" Talks with Trelawny," AthencBum^ July 15, 1882). He had, . . . though a delicate, a naturally good constitution, which he had impaired at one period of his life by an excessive use of opium, ^ and * There does not appear to be any good corroborative evidence upon this point. One or two instances are recorded, by other biographers, when Shelley used opium ; but there is nothing to justify Medwin's assertion, or to warrant the inferences which might be drawn from it. Opium. lOO PERCY BYSSFIE SHELLEY. Fondness /jr bread. a Pythagorean diet, which greatly emaciated his system and weakened his digestion. — Thomas Med- wiN (''Life of Slielley"). Bysshe's dietary was frugal and independent ; very remarkable and quite peculiar to himself. When he felt hungry he would dash into the first baker's shop, buy a loaf and rush out again, bearing it under his arm ; and he strode onwards in his rapid course, breaking off pieces of bread and greedily swallowing them. But however frugal the fare, the waste was considerable, and his path might be tracked, like that of Hop-o'-my-Thumb through the wood, in Mother Goose her Tale, by a long line of crumbs. The spot where he sat reading or writ- ing, and eating his dry bread, was likewise marked out by a circle of crumbs and fragments scattered on the floor. He took Avith bread, frequently by w^ay of condiment, not water-cresses, as did the Persians of old, but common pudding raisins. These he purchased at some mean little shop, that he might be the more speedily served, and he car- ried them loose in his waistcoat-pocket, and eat them with his dry bread. . . . He was walking one day in London with a respectable solicitor, who occasionally transacted business for him ; with his accustomed precipitation he suddenly vanished, and as suddenly reappeared ; he had entered the shop of a little grocer in an obscure quarter, and had re- turned with some plums, which he held close under the attorney's nose, and the man of fact was as much astonished at the offer, as his client, the man of fancy, at the refusal. — T. J, Hogg ("Life of Shelley"). PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. lOI He occasionally rolled up little pellets of bread, and, in a sly, mysterious manner, shot them with his thumb, hitting the persons — whom he met in his walks — on the face, commonly on the nose, at which lie grew to be very dextrous. When he was dining at a coffee-house, he would sometimes amuse himself thus. . . . A person receiving an unceremonious fillip on the nose, after this fashion, started and stared about; but I never found that anybody, al- though I was often apprehensive that some one might resent it, perceived or suspected, from what quarter the offending missile had come. The wounded party seemed to find satisfaction in gazing upwards, at the ceiling, and in the belief that a piece of plaster had fallen from thence. When he was eating his bread alone over his book he would shoot his pellets about the room, taking aim at a picture, at an image, or at any other object that at- tracted his notice. He had been taught by a French lady to make panada ; and w4th this food he often indulged himself. His simple cookery was per- formed thus. He broke a quantity— often, indeed, a surprising quantity — of bread into a large basin, and poured boiling water upon it. When the bread had been steeped awhile, and had swelled suffi- ciently, he poured off the water, squeezing it out of the bread, which he chopped up w^th a spoon ; he then sprinkled powdered loaf sugar over it, and grated nutmeg upon it, and devoured the mass with a prodigious relish. He was standing one day in the middle of the room, basin in hand, feeding him- self voraciously, gorging himself with pap. *' Why, Bysshe," T said, "you lap it up as greedily Bread- balls. Panada. 102 PERCY BY S SHE SHELLEY. " Lapping up the blood of the slain" Love of chemistry . £.ton. Life at Ox- ford. as the Valkyrise of Scandinavian story lap up the blood of the slain ! " ''Aye!" he shouted out with grim delight, ''I lap up the blood of the slain ! " The idea captivated him ; he was continually re- peating the words; and he often took panada, I suspect, merely to indulge this wild fancy, and to say, " I am going to lap up the blood of the slain ! To sup up the gore of murdered kings." Having previously fed himself after his fashion from his private stores, he was independent of din- ner, and quite indifferent to it, the slice of tough mutton would remain, untouched upon his plate, and he would sit at table reading some book, often reading aloud, seemingly unconscious of the hos- pitable rites in which others were engaged, his bread bullets meanwhile being discharged in every direction.— T. J. Hogg (''Life of Shelley"). Shelley passed his leisure hours ^ in making vari- ous experiments in chemistry and natural science. He even went so far as to employ a travelling tinker to assist him in making a miniature steam-engine, which burst, and very nearly blew the bard and the Bethel family into the air. — R. H. Gronow (" Celeb- rities of London and Paris "). He was, indeed, a whole university in himself to me, in respect of the stimulus and incitement which his example afforded to my love of study, and he amply atoned for the disappointment I had felt on my arrival at Oxford. . . . We almost in- ^ At Eton, in 1809. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 103 variably passed the afternoon and evening together. . . . His rooms were preferred to mine, because there his philosophical apparatus was at hand ; and ^^^^Jf^*^'^' at that period he was not perfectly satisfied w4th the condition and circumstances of his existence, unless he was able to start from his seat at any moment, and seizing the air-pump, some magnets, the electrical machine, or the bottles contain- ing those noxious and nauseous fluids, wherewith he incessantly besmeared and disfigured himself and his goods, to ascertain by actual experiment the value of some new idea that rushed into his brain. He spent much time in working by fits and starts and in an irregular manner with his instru- ments, and especially consumed his hours and his money in the assiduous cultivation of chemistry. — T. J. Hogg {^' Life of Shelley "). He w^as a devoted worshipper of the water- nymphs ; for whenever he found a pool, or even a small puddle, he would loiter near it, and it was no easy task to get him to quit it. He had not yet learned that art, from which he afterward derived so much pleasure — the construction of paper-boats. He twisted a morsel of paper into a form that a lively fancy might consider a likeness of a boat, and committing it to the water, he anxiously v/atched the fortunes of the frail bark, which, if it was not soon swamped by the faint winds and miniature waves, gradually imbibed water through its porous sides, and sank. Sometimes, however, the fairy vessel performed its little voyage, and reached the op- posite shore of the puny ocean in safety. It is Paper-ban t navigation. 104 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Paper-boat 7itvigation. astonishing with what keen delight he engaged in this singular pursuit. It was not easy for an un- initiated spectator to bear with tolerable patience the vast delay, on the brink of a wretched pond upon a bleak common, and in the face of a cutting northeast wind, on returning to dinner from a long walk at sunset on a cold "winter's day. ... So long as his paper lasted, he remained riveted to the spot, fascinated by this peculiar amusement; all waste paper was rapidly consumed, then the covers of letters, next letters of little value ; the most precious contributions of the most esteemed corre- spondence, although eyed wistfully many times, and often returned to the pocket, were sure to be sent at last in pursuit of the former squadrons. . . . It has been said, that he once found himself on the north bank of the Serpentine River w^ithout the materials for indulging those inclinations, which the sight of water invariably inspired, for he had exhausted his supplies on the round pond in Ken- sington Gardens. Not a single scrap of paper could be found, save only a bank-post bill for fifty pounds; he hesitated long, but yielded at last ; he twisted it into a boat with the extreme refinement of his skill, and committed it with the utmost dexterity to fortune, watching its progress, if pos- sible, with a still more intense anxiety than usual. Fortune often favors those who frankly and fully trust her ; the northeast w^ind gently w^afted the costly skiff to the south bank, where, during the latter part of the voyage, the venturous owner had awaited its arrival with patient solicitude. — T. J. Hogg (''Life of Shelley"). PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 105 At times he was as sportive as his child (with whom he would play by the hour on the floor), and his wit flowed in a continual stream — not that broad humor which is so much in vogue at the present day, but a genuine wit, classical I might say, and refined, that caused a smile rather than a laugh.' — Thomas Medwin (" Life of Shelley "). Shelley often came to Hampstead to see me, sometimes to stop for several days. He delighted in the natural broken ground, and in the fresh air of the place, especially when the wind set in from the northwest, which used to give him an intoxica- tion of animal spirits. Here also he swam his paper- boats on the ponds, and delighted to play with my children, particularly with my eldest boy,'' the seri- ousness of whose imagination, and his susceptibil- ity of a ''grim" impression (a favorite epithet of Shelley's), highly interested him. He would play at " frightful creatures " with him, from which the other would snatch a "fearful joy," only begging him occasionally "not to do the horn," which was a way Shelley had of screwing up his hair in front, to imitate a weapon of that sort. — Leigh Hunt C' Autobiography "). I can remember well one day when we were both for some long time engaged in gambols, broken off 'Charles Cowden Clarke, in " Recollections of Writers," says, *' I have the remembrance of his scampering and bounding over the gorse-bushes on Hampstead Heath late one night, — now close upon us, and now shouting from the height, like a wild school-boy." 2 Thornton Hunt. Playfulnesc. Playing^ with chil- df en. io6 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Playing ivith chil- dren. Rambles with a boy. by my terror at his screwing up his long and curling hair into a horn, and approaching me with rampant paws and frightful gestures as some imaginative monster. — Thornton Hunt {Atlantic Monthly^ Feb- ruaiy, 1863). Shelley often called me for a long ramble on the heath, or into regions which I then thought far distant; and I went with him rather than with my father, be- cause he walked faster, and talked with me while he walked, instead of being lost in his own thoughts and conversing only at intervals. A love of wan- dering seemed to possess him in the most literal sense ; his rambles seemed to be without design, or any limit but my fatigue ; and when I w^as " done up," he carried me home in his arms, on his shoul- der, or pickback. Our communion was not always concord ; as I have intimated, he took a pleasure in frightening me, though I never really lost my confidence in his protection, if he would only drop the fantastic aspects that he delighted to assume. — Thornton Hunt {Atlantic Monthly^ Feb- ruary, 1863). I have already pointed out several contradictions in his appearance and character ; his ordinary prep- aration for a rural "walk formed a very remarkable contrast with his mild aspect and pacific habits. He furnished himself with a pair of duelling pis- tols, and a good store of powder and ball ; and when he came to a solitary spot, he pinned a card, or fixed some other mark upon a tree or bank, and amused himself by firing at it ; he was a pretty PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 107 good shot, and was much delighted at his success/ . . . The duelling pistols were a most discord- ant interruption of the repose of a quiet country walk ; besides, he handled them with such inconceiv- able carelessness, that I had perpetually reason to apprehend that . . . he would shoot himself, or me, or both of us. — T. J. Hogg (" Life of Shelley "). Shelley loved everything better than himself. Self-preservation is, they say, the first law of nature, with him it was the last ; and the only pain he ever gave his friends arose from the utter indifference with which he treated everything concerning himself. I was bathing one day in a deep pool in the Arno, and astonished the poet by performing a series of aquatic gymnastics, which I had learned from the nativ^es of the South Seas. On my coming out, Avhilst dressing, Shelley said, mournfully, "Why can't I swim, it seems so very easy ? " I answ^ered, " Because you think you can't. If you determine, you will ; take a header off this bank, and when you rise turn on your back, you will float like a duck ; but you must reverse the arch in your Lpine, for it's now bent the wrong way." He doffed his jacket and trowsers, kicked off his shoes and socks, and plunged in ; and there he lay stretched out on the bottom like a conger-eel, not making the least effort or struggle to save himself. He would have been drowned if I had not instantly fished him out. When he recovered his breath, he said : " I always * Leigh Hunt, Trelawny, and others tell of his fondness for this amusement, and how he and Byron joined in the sport, during their life together in Italy. Rambles nvith a boy. C (I re less of his oivn safety. io8 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Careless of his o-ivn safety. Ifidiffer- ence to death. Prussia acid. find the bottom of the well, and they say Truth lies there. In another minute I should have found it, and you would have found an empty shell. It is an easy way of getting rid of the body." '• What would Mrs. Shelley have said to me if I had gone back to her with your empty cage?" "Don't tell Mar}^ — not a word ! " he rejoined, and then continued, *' It's a great temptation ; in another minute, I might have been in another planet." — E. J. Trelawny (" Records of Shelley, Byron," etc.). He was once with me in a gale of wind, in a small boat, right under the rocks between Meillerie and St. Gingo. We were five in the boat — a servant, two boatmen, and ourselves. The sail was mis- managed, and the boat was filling fast. He can't swim. I stripped off my coat, made him strip oiff his, and take hold of an oar, telling him that I thought (being myself an expert swimmer) I could save him, if he would not struggle when I took hold of him. . . . We were then about a hundred yards from shore, and the boat in peril. He an- swered me with the greatest coolness, that he had no notion of being saved, and that I would have enough to do to save myself, and begged not to trouble me. Luckily the boat righted, and, bailing, we got round a point into St. Gingo. — Lord Byron (quoted in Moore's ''Life of Byron "). Lerici, yiine i8, 1822. — My dear Trelawny, . . . You, of course, enter into society at Leg- horn : should you meet with any scientific person, capable of preparing the Frussic Acid, or essential PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 109 oil of bitter almonds, I should regard it as a great kindness if you could procure me a small quantity. . . . I woulgl give any price for this medicine ; you remember we talked of it the other night, and we both expressed a wish to possess it ; my wish was serious, and sprung from the desire of avoiding needless suffering. I need not tell you I have no intention of suicide at present, but I confess it would be a comfort to me to hold in my possession that golden key to the chamber of perpetual rest. — Percy B. Shelley (*' Works in Verse and Prose"). I never visited his rooms until one o'clock, by which hour, as I rose very early, I had not only at- tended the college lectures, but had read in private for several hours. I was enabled, moreover, to continue my studies afterwards in the evening, in consequence of a very remarkable peculiarity. My young and energetic friend was then overcome by extreme drowsiness, which speedily and completely vanquished him ; he would sleep from two to four hours, often so soundly that his shimbers resembled a deep lethargy ; he lay occasionally upon the sofa, but more commonly stretched upon the rug before a large fire, like a cat ; and his little round head was exposed to such a fierce heat, that I used to wonder how he was able to bear it/ Sometimes I ' Shelley's treatment of his head was peculiar. In addition to toasting it before a hot fire, and exposing it, whenever he could, to the hottest rays of the sun, Hogg tells us of another mode of treatment: "The poor, imaginative head was plunged several times a day into a basin full of cold water, which he invariably filled brimful, in order to throw as much water as possible on his feet and the floor." Prussic acid. Napfiing en the hearth. no PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Napping on the hearth. Somnatn- bulism. have interposed some shelter, but rarely with any permanent effect ; for the sleeper usually contrived to turn himself, and to roll again into the spot where the fire glowed the brightest. His torpor was generally profound, but he would sometimes discourse incoherently for a long while in his sleep. At six he would suddenly compose himself, even in the midst of a most animated narrative or of earnest discussion ; and he would lie buried in entire for- getfulness, in a sweet and mighty oblivion, until ten, when he would suddenly start up, and rubbing his eyes with great violence, and passing his fin- gers swiftly through his long hair, would enter at once into a vehement argument, or begin to recite verses, either of his own composition or from the works of others, with a rapidity and an energy that were often quite painful. — T. J. Hogg ("Life of Shelley"). His systematizing of dreams, and encouraging, if I may so say, the habit of dreaming, ... re- vived in him his old somnambulism. As an in- stance of this, being in Leicester Square one morn- ing at five o'clock, I was attracted by a group of boys collected round a well-dressed person lying near the rails. On coming up to them, my curiosity being excited, I descried Shelley, who had uncon- sciously spent a part of the night sub dio. He could give me no account of how he got there. ^ — Thomas Medwin (" Life of Shelley "). ^ Medwin gives two other instances of Shelley's somnambulism : one, when he was a school-boy, the other, during his life in Italy. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. II He took strange caprices, unfounded frights and dislikes, vain apprehensions and panic terrors, and therefore he absented himself from formal and sa- cred engagements. He was unconscious and ob- livious of times, persons, and seasons ; and falling into some poetic vision, some day-dream, he quickly and completely forgot all that he had repeatedly and solemnly promised ; or he ran away after some object of imaginary urgency and importance, which suddenly came into his head, setting off in vain pursuit of it, he knew not whither. — T. J. Hogg ("Life of Shelley"). In a crowded stage-coach Shelley once happened to sit opposite an old woman with very thick legs, who, as he imagined, was afflicted with elephantiasis, an exceedingly rare and most terrible disease, in which the legs swell and become as thick as those of an elephant, together with many other distressing symptoms, as the thickening and cracking of the skin, and indeed a w^hole Iliad of woes, of which he had recently read a formidable description in some medical work, that had taken entire possession of his fanciful and impressible soul. The patient, quite unconscious of her misery, sat dozing quietly over against him. He also took it into his head that the disease is veiy infectious, and that he had caught it of his corpulent and drowsy fellow-trav- eller ; he presently began to discover unequivocal symptoms of the fearful contagion in his own per- son. I never saw him so thoroughly unhappy as he was, whilst he continued under the influence of this strange and unaccountable impression. His Crotchety freaks. A hypochon- driac 7vhivt. Elephanti- asis. 112 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. A kypochon- driac whim. Elephanti- female friends tried to laugh him out of this pre- posterous whim, bantered him and inquired how he came to find out that his fair neighbor had such thick legs ? He did not relish, or even understand their jests, but sighed deeply. By the advice of his friends, he was prevailed upon to consult a skilful and experienced surgeon, and submitted to a minute and careful examination : the surgeon of course as- sured him that no signs or traces of elephantiasis could be discerned. He farther informed him that the disease is excessively rare, almost unknown, in this part of the world ; that it is not infectious, and that a person really afflicted by it could not bear to travel in a crowded stage-coach. Bysshe shook his head, sighed more deeply, and was more thoroughly convinced than ever that he was the victim of a cruel and incurable disease ; and that these assur- ances were only given with the humane design of soothing one doomed to a miserable and inevitable death. His imagination was so much disturbed, that he was perpetually examining his own skin, and feeling and looking at that of others. One evening, during the access of his fancied disorder, when many young ladies were standing up for a country dance, he caused a wonderful consternation among these charming creatures by walking slowly along the row of girls and curiously surveying them, placing his eyes close to their necks and bosoms, and feeling their breasts and bare arms, in order to ascertain whether any of the fair ones had taken the horrible disease. He proceeded with so much gravity and seriousness, and his looks were so woe-begone, that they did not resist, or resent, the extraordinary lib- PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 113 erties, but looked terrified, and as if they were about to undergo some severe surgical operation at his hands. Their partners were standing opposite in silent and angry amazement, unable to decide in what way the strange manipulations were to be taken ; yet nobody interrupted his heart-broken handlings, which seemed, from his dejected air, to be preparatory to cutting his own throat. At last the lady of the house perceived what the young philosopher was about, and by assuring him that not one of the young ladies, as she had herself as- certained, had been infected, and, with gentle ex- postulations, induced him to desist, and to suffer the dancing to proceed without further examina- tions. The monstrous delusion continued for some days ; with the aspect of grim despair he came stealthily and opened the bosom of my shirt several times a day, and minutely inspected my skin, shaking his head, and by his distressed mien plainly signifying that he was not by any means satisfied with the state of my health. He also quietly drew up my sleeves, and by rubbing it investigated the skin of my arms ; also measured my legs and ankles, span- ning them with a convulsive grasp. '' Bysshe, wx both have the legs and the skin of an elephant, but neither of us has his sagacity ! " He shook his head in sad, silent disapproval ; to jest in the very jaws of death was hardened insensibility, not genuine philosophy. . . . This strange fancy continued to afflict him for several weeks, and to divert, or distress, his friends, and then it was forgotten as suddenly as it had been taken up, and gave place to I.— 8 A hyphen- driac ivhhfi. Elephanti- asis, 114 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. A vision. Sensitive- ness. more cheerful reminiscences or forebodings. — T. J. Hogg (''Life of Shelley"). The journal of Edward Williams contains the fol- lowing account of one of the many hallucinations to which, throughout the whole course of his life, Shelley was subject. Portions of this journal were published by Mrs. Shelley and by Richard Garnet ; the present extract is made from H. B. Forman's edition of Shelley's works : Monday^ May 6, 1822. — After tea, walking witli Shelley on the terrace, and observing the effect of moonshine on the waters, he complained of being unusually nervous, and stopping short, he grasped me violently by the arm, and stared steadfastly on the white surf that broke upon the beach under our feet. Observing him sensibly affected, I demanded of him if he were in pain ? But he only answered, by saying, " There it is again — there ! " He recov- ered after some time, and declared that he saw, as plainly as he then saw me, a naked child {the child of a friend who had lately died) rise from the sea, and clap its hands as in joy, smiling at him. This was a trance that it required some reasoning and philosophy entirely to awaken him from, so forcibly had the vision operated on his mind. Shelley was of an extreme sensibility — of a mor- bid sensibility — and strange, discordant sounds he could not bear to hear ; he shrank from the unmu- sical voice of the Caledonian maiden.^ Whenever The maid of all work in Shelley's lodging in Edinburgh. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 115 Sensitive- ness. she entered the room, or even came to the door, he rushed wildly into a corner and covered his ears ■with his hands. We had, to our shame be it spoken, a childish, mischievous delight in torment- ing him, and catching the shy virgin and making her speak in his presence. The favorite interroga- tory so often administered was, " Have you had your dinner to-day, Christie?" "Yes." "And what did you get ?" '^Singit heed and bonnocks," was the unvarying answer, and its efficacy was in- stantaneous and sovereign. Our poor sensitive poet assumed the air of the Distracted Musician, became nearly frantic, and had we been on the prom- ontory, he w^ould certainly have taken the Leu- cadian leap for Christie's sake, and to escape from the rare music of her voice. — T. J. Hogg (" Life of Shelley "). Like many other over-sensitive people, he thought everybody shunned him, whereas it was he who stood aloof. To the few who sought his acquaintance, he was frank, cordial, and if they appeared worthy, friendly in the extreme ; but he shrank like a maiden from making the first ad- vances. At the beginning of his literary life, he believed all authors published their opinions as he did his from a deep conviction of their truth and importance, after due investigation. When a new work appeared, on any subject that interested him, he would write to the authors, expressing his opin- ion of their books, and giving his reasons for his judgment, always arguing logically, and not for display ; and, with his serene and imperturbable Shynessand frankness. ii6 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Skynessand frankness. Delicacy of jnind. Iw a Pres- byterian church if I Edinburgh, temper, variety of knowledge, tenacious memory, command of language, or rather of all the lan- guages of literature, he was a most subtle critic ; but, as authors are not tlie meekest or mildest of men, he occasionally met with rude rebuffs, and re- tired into his own shell. — E. J. Trelawny (" Records of Shelley, Byron," etc.). Though the least effeminate of men, so far as personal or moral courage was concerned, the mind of Shelley was essentially feminine, some would say fastidious in its delicacy; an innate purity which not even the license of college habits and society could corrupt. A fellow-collegian thus writes of him : '' Shelley was actually offended, and, indeed, more indignant than would seem to be consistent with the singular mildness of his nature, at a coarse and awkward jest, especially if it were immodest or uncleanly ; in the latter case his anger was unbounded, and his uneasiness pre-eminent." — Anonymous ("A Graybeard's Gossip," New Monthly Magazine^ 1847). We reached a place of worship, and entered it with the rest ; it was plain, spacious, and gloomy. We suffered ourselves rather incautiously to be planted side by side, on a bench in the middle of the devout assembly, so that escape was impossible. There was singing, in which all, or almost all, the congregation joined ; it Avas loud, and discordant, and protracted. There was praying, there was preaching, — both extemporaneous. We prayed for all sorts and conditions of men, more particularly PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. In a Pres- byterian church ht Edinburgh. for our enemies. The preacher discoursed at a prodigious length, repeating many times things which were not worthy to be said once, and threat- ening us much with the everlasting punishments, which, solemnly and confidently, he declared were in store for us. T never saw Shelley so dejected, so desponding, so despairing ; he looked like the picture of perfect wretchedness ; the poor fellow sighed piteously, as if his heart w^ould break. If they thought that he was conscience-stricken, and that his vast sorrow was for his sins, all, who observed him, must have been delighted with him, as with one filled with the comfortable assurance of eternal perdition. No one present could possibly have comprehended the real nature of his acute suffer- ings, — could have sympathized in the anguish and agony of a creature of the most poetic temperament that ever was bestowed, for his weal or his woe, upon any human being, at feeling himself in the most unpoetic position in which he could possibly be placed. At last, after expectations many times dis- appointed of an approaching deliverance, and having been repeatedly deceived by glimpses of an impend- ing discharge, and having long endured that sick- ness of heart caused by hopes deferred, the tedious worship actually terminated. — T. J. Hogg (" Life of Shelley "). No student ever read more assiduously. He was to be found, book in hand, at all hours ; reading in season and out of season ; at table, in bed, and es- pecially during a walk ; not only in the quiet coun- try, and in retired paths ; not only at Oxford, in the Reading, ii8 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Reading, Friendly strategy. public walks, and High Street, but in the most crowded thoroughfares of London. Nor was he less absorbed by the volume that was open before him, in Cheapside, in Cranbourne Alley, or in Bond Street, than in a lonely lane, or a secluded library. . . . I never beheld eyes that devoured the pages more voraciously than his : I am convinced that two-thirds of the period of day and night were often employed in reading. It is no exaggeration to af- firm, that out of the twenty-four hours, he frequently read sixteen. . . . Tea and toast were often neg- lected, his author seldom. . . . He invariably sallied forth, book in hand, reading to himself, if he was alone, if he had a companion, reading aloud. He took a volume to bed with him, and read as long as his candle lasted ; he then slept — impatiently, no doubt — until it was light, and he recommenced reading at the early dawn. — T. J. Hogg (" Life of Shelley "). On the evening of a wet day, when we bad read with scarcely any intermission from an early hour in the morning, I have urged him to lay aside his book. It required some extravagance to rouse him to join heartily in conversation ; to tempt him to avoid the chimney-piece, on which commonly he had laid the open volume. ** If I were to read as long as you read, Shelley, my hair and my teeth would be strewed about on the floor, and my eyes would slip down my cheeks into my waistcoat pockets ; or at least I should be- come so weary and nervous that I should not know whether it were so or not." PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 119 He began to scrape the carpet with his feet, as if teeth were actually lying upon it, and he looked fix- edly at my face, and his lively fancy represented the empty sockets ; his imagination was excited, and tlie spell that bound him to his books was broken, and creeping close to the fire, and, as it were, under the fireplace, he commenced a most animated dis- course.— T. J. Hogg (" Life of Shelley "). Shelley's thirst for knowledge was unquenchable. He set to work on a book, or a pyramid of books ; his eyes glistening with an energy as fierce as that of the most sordid gold-digger who works at a rock of quartz, crushing his way through all impediments, no grain of the pure ore escaping his eager scrutiny. I called on him one morning at ten ; he was in his study with a German folio open, resting on the broad marble mantel-piece, over an old-fashioned fireplace, and with a dictionary in his hand. He always read standing if possible. He had promised over night to go with me, but now begged me to let him off. I then rode to Leghorn, eleven or twelve miles distant, and passed the day there ; on returning at six in the evening, to dine with Mrs. Shelley and the Williamses, as I had engaged to do, I went into the poet's room, and found him ex- actly in the position in which I had left him in the morning, but looking pale and exhausted. " Well," I said, " have you found it ? " Shutting the book and going to the window, he replied, " No, I have lost it ; " with a deep sigh ; '■'■ I have lost a day." " Cheer up, my lad, and come to dinner." Friendly strategy. Story of a day. I20 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Story of a day. In the pine forest 7iear Pisa. Putting his long fingers through his masses of wild tangled hair, he answered faintly, '* You go, I have dined — late eating don't do for me." ''What is this?" I asked, as I was going out of the room, pointing to one of his book-shelves with a plate containing bread and cold meat on it. "That," — coloring, — " why that must be my din- ner. It's very foolish ; I thought I had eaten it." Saying I was determined that he should for once have a regular meal, I lugged him into the dining- room, but he brought a book with him, and read more than he ate. — E. J. Trelawny (" Records of Shelley, Byron," etc.).. With no landmarks to guide me, nor sky to be I seen above, I was bewildered in this wilderness of I pines and ponds ; so I sat down, struck a light, and smoked a cigar. A red man would have known his course of the trees themselves, their growth, form, and color ; or if a footstep had passed that day, he would have hit upon its trail. As I mused upon his sagacity and my own stupidity, the braying of a brother jackass startled me. He was followed by an old man picking up pine-cones. I asked him if he had seen a stranger. " L'Inglese malincolico haunts the woods male- detta — I will show you his nest" As we advanced, the ground swelled into mounds and hollows. By and by the old fellow pointed with his stick to a hat, books, and loose papers lying about, and then to a deep pool of dark glimmering water, saying, " Eccolo ! " I thought he meant that Shelley was in or under the water. The careless, PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 121 not to say impatient, way in which the poet bore his burden of life, caused a vague dread among his family and friends that he might lose or cast it away at any moment. The strong light streamed through the opening of the trees. One of the pines, undermined by the water, had fallen into it. Under its lee, and nearly hidden, sat the poet, gazing below on the dark mirror beneath, so lost in his bardish reverie that he did not hear my approach. There the trees were stunted and bent, and their crowns were shorn like friars by the sea-breezes, excepting a cluster of three, under which Shelley's traps were lying ; these overtopped the rest. To avoid startling the poet out of his dream, I squatted under the lofty trees, and opened his books. One was a volume of his favorite Greek dramatist, Sophocles, — the same that I found in his pocket after his death, and the other was a volume of Shakespeare. I then hailed him, and, turning his head, he answered faintly, ** Hollo, come in." " Is this your study ? " I asked. " Yes," he answered, '' and these trees are my books — they tell no lies. You are sitting on the stool of inspiration," he exclaimed. " In those three pines the weird sisters are imprisoned, and this," pointing to the water, *'is their caldron of black broth. The Pythian priestesses uttered their oracles from below — now they are muttered from above. Listen to the solemn music in the pine-tops — don't you hear the mournful murmurings of the sea ? Sometimes they rave and roar, shriek and howl, like a rabble of priests. la a tempest, when a ship sinks, they catch the despairing groans of the In the fii/te /or est 7iear Pisa. 122 PER CY B YSSHE SHELLE V. In the pine Jjrest near Pisa. drowning mariners. Their chorus is the eternal wailing of wretched men." ''They, lilce the world," I observed, "seem to take no note of wretched women. The sighs and wailing you talk about are not those of wretched men afar off, but are breathed by a woman near at hand — not from the pine-tops, but by a forsaken lady." ''What do you mean ?" he asked. "Why, that an hour or two ago I left your wnfe, Mary Shelley, at the entrance of this grove, in despair at not finding you." He started up, snatched up his scattered books and papers, thrust them into his hat and jacket pockets, sighing "Poor Mary! hers is a sad fate. Come along ; she can't bear solitude, nor I society — the quick coupled with the dead." He glided along with his usual swiftness, for nothing could make him pause for an instant when he had an ob- ject in view, until he had attained it.^ On hearing our voices, Mrs. Shelley joined us ; her clear gray eyes and thoughtful brow expressing the love she could not speak. To stop Shelley's self-reproaches, or to hide her own emotions, she began in a ban- tering tone, chiding and coaxing him ; . . . Shelley, like other students, would, when the spell that bound his faculties was broken, shut his books and indulge in the wildest flights of mirth and folly. As this is a sport all can join in, we talked, and laughed, and shrieked, and shouted, as we ^ W. M. Rossetti notes, in his "Talks witli Trelawny," ** 1870, March 11. 'Shelley,' he said, 'was more self-willed than my- self;' with exquisite gentleness of manner he would always do, and do on the instant, what he resolved on." PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 123 emerged from under the shadows of the melancholy pines and their nodding plumes, into the now cool purple twilight and open country. The cheerful and graceful peasant girls, returning home from the vineyards and olive groves, stopped to look at us. The old man I had met in the morning gathering pine-cones, passed hurriedly by with his donkey, giving Shelley a wide berth, and evidently thinking that the melancholy Englishman had now become a raving maniac. — E. J. Trelawny ('* Records of Shelley, Byron," etc.). The day I found Shelley in the pine forest, he was writing verses on a guitar. I picked up a fragment, but could only make out the first two lines : " Ariel, to Miranda take This slave of music." It was in a frightful scrawl ; words smeared out with his finger, and one upon the other, over and over in tiers, and all run together in most "admired disorder;" it might have been taken for a sketch of a marsh overgrown with bulrushes, and the blots for wild geese ; such a dashed-oif daub as self-con- ceited artists mistake for a manifestation of genius. On my observing this to him, he answered, ''When my brain gets heated with thought, it soon boils, and throws off images and words faster than I can skim them off. In the morning, when cooled down, out of the rude sketch as you justly call it, I shall attempt a drawing. If you ask me why I publish what few or none will care to read, it is that the spirits I have raised haimt me until they Ik the pine forest near Ftsa. Methods 0/ work. 124 PERCY BYSSFIE SHELLEY. Working- out of doors. Extempore rhyming^ are sent to the devil of a printer. All authors are anxious to breech their bantlings." — E. J. Tre- LAWNY (" Records of Shelley, Byron," etc.). Throughout his life Shelley loved to work in the open air. Mrs. Shelley says that "The Revolt of Islam " ''was written in his boat, as it floated under the beech-groves of Bisham, or during wanderings in the neighboring country." He wrote "The Cenci" upon the roof of his villa at Leghorn." " The Triumph of Life " was written in his boat, in the Bay of Spezia. In 1880 Trelawny said, in an- swer to the question, " Did Shelley ever shut him- self up to write ? " '* Shut himself up ! " shouted Mr. Trelawny indignantly. " Never ! He wrote his poems in the open air ; on the sea-shore ; in the pine woods ; and, like a shepherd, he could tell the time of day exactly by the light. He never had a watch, and I think Byron never had ; but, if the latter had one, he never wore it." On one occasion, I remember a remarkable in- stance of Shelley's facility and exercise of imagina- tion. A word was chosen, and all the rhymes to it in the language, and they were very numerous, set down, without regard to their corresponding mean- ings, and in a few minutes he filled in the blanks with a beautifully fanciful poem, which, probably, no one preserved, though now I should highly prize such a relic. — Thomas Medwin ('' Life of Shelley "). I induced him one evening to accompany me to a representation of the " School for Scandal." When, PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 125 after the scenes which exhibited Charles Surface in his jollity, the scene returned, in the fourth act, to yosepJis library, Shelley said to me, — '' Isee the pur- pose of this comedy. It is to associate virtue with bottles and glasses, and villany with books." I had great difficulty to make him stay to the end. He often talked of the withering and perverting spirit of comedy. I do not think he ever went to another. — T. L. Peacock {Eraser's Magazine^ June, 1858). November 6, 181 7. — I went to Godwin's. Mr. Shelley was there. I had never seen him before. His youth, and a resemblance to Southey, particu- larly in his voice, raised a pleasing impression, which was not altogether destroyed by his conver- sation, though it is vehement, and arrogant, and in- tolerant. He was very abusive towards Southey, whom he spoke of as having sold himself to the Court. And this he maintained with the usual party slang. . . . Shelley spoke of Wordsworth with less bitterness, but with an insinuation of his insin- cerity, etc.— Henry Crabb Robinson ("Diary," etc.).' Shelley Haydon met occasionally. His account of their first meeting, in 1816, is characteristic ; it was at a dinner — one of the last he went to at Leigh Hunt's. Haydon arrived late and took his place at the table. Opposite to him sat a hectic, spare, intellectual-looking creature, carving a bit of broccoli on his plate as if it were the substantial ^ Robinson (Henry Crabb). Diary, Reminiscences, and Corre- spondence. Edited by T. Sadler. 3 vols., 8vo. London, 1869. Prejudice agaitisi comedy. Arrogant and intoler' ant. Aggressive table-talk. 126 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Aggressive table-talk. In society. wing of a chicken. This was Shelley. Suddenly, in the most feminine and gentle voice, Shelley said, " As to that detestable religion, the Christian," ^ — Haydon looked up. But says he in his diary, *' On casting a glance round the table, I easily saw by Leigh Hunt's expression of ecstasy and the simper of the women, I was to be set at that evening 'vi et armis.' I felt exactly like a stag at bay, and I re- solved to gore without mercy." The result was a heated and passionate argument. — F. W. Haydon C Haydon's Correspondence," "^ etc.). I have had the happiness to associate with some of the best specimens of gentlemen ; but with all due deference for those admirable persons (may my candor and my preference be pardoned), I can affirm that Shelley was almost the only example I have yet found that was never wanting, even in the most minute particular, of the infinite and various observances of pure, entire, and perfect gentility. — T. J. Hogg (" Life of Shelley "). I have seen Shelley and Byron in society, and the contrast was as marked as their characters. The ' In a letter to Horace Smith, in 1822, Shelley says that if he had any influence with Byron he " should employ it to eradicate from his great mind the delusions of Christianity." He further says, in the same letter : "I differ with Moore in thinking Chris- tianity useful to the world ; no man of sense can think it true." See p. 132. ^ Haydon (Frederick W.). Benjamin Robert Haydon : Corre- spondence and Table-talk, with a Memoir. 2 vols., 8vo. London, 1876. PER CY B YSSHE SHELLE Y. 127 former, not thinking of himself, was as much at ease as in his own liome, omitting no occasion of oblig- ing those whom he came in contact with, readily conversing with all or any who addressed him, irre- spective of age or rank, dress or address. To the first party I went with Byron, as we were on our road, he said, " It's so long since I have been in English society, you must tell me what are their present customs. Does rank lead the way, or does the ambassadress pair us off into the dining-room ? Do they ask people to wine ? Do we exit with the women, or stick to our claret ? " On arriving, he was flushed, fussy, embarrassed, over-ceremonious, and ill at ease, evidently thinking a great deal of him- self, and very little of others. — E. J. Trelawny ("Records of Shelley, Byron," etc.). One morning I was in Mrs. Williams' drawling- room. . . . Shelley stood before us with a most w^oful expression. Mrs. Williams started up, ex- claiming, '* What's the matter, Percy ? " " Mary has threatened me." " Threatened you with what ? " He looked mysterious, and too agitated to reply. Mrs. Williams repeated, *' With what t to box your ears?" "Oh, much worse than that; Mary says she will have a party ; there are English sing- ers here, the Sinclairs, and she will ask them, and every one she or you know — oh, the horror ! " We all burst into a laugh except his friend Ned. "It will kill me." "Music kill you!" said Mrs. Wil- liams. "Why, you have told me, you flatterer, that you loved music." " So I do. It's the company that terrifies me. For pity go to Mary and inter- Contrasted with Byron. Dread of bores. 128 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Interest in national affairs. cede for me ; I will submit to any other species of torture than that of being bored to death by idle ladies and gentlemen." — E. J. Trelawny ('' Records of Shelley, Byron," etc.). Shelley was not only anxious for the good of mankind in general. We have seen what he pro- posed on the subject of Reform in Parliament,^ and he was always very desirous of the national welfare. It was a moot point when he entered your room, whether he would begin with some half-pleasant, half-pensive joke, or quote something Greek, or ask some question about public affairs. He once came upon me at Hampstead, when I had not seen him for some time ; and after grasping my hands into both of his, in his usual fervent manner, he sat down, and looked at me very earnestly, with a deep, though not melancholy interest in his face. We were sitting with our knees to the fire, to which we had been getting nearer and nearer, in the comfort of finding ourselves together. The pleasure of see- ing him was my only feeling at the moment ; and the air of domesticity about us was so complete, that I thought he was going to speak of some family matter, either his or my own, when he asked me, at the close of an intensity of pause, what was "the amount of the National Debt." I used to rally him on the apparent inconsequen- tiality of his manner upon these occasions, and he was always ready to carry on the jest, because he ^ He had offered to subscribe one thousand pounds toward founding an association to carry on this work. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 129 said that my laughter did not hinder my being in earnest. — Leigh Hunt (''Autobiography"). I never could discern in him any more than two fixed principles. The first was a strong irrepres- sible love of liberty ; of liberty in the abstract, and somewhat after the pattern of the ancient republics, without reference to the English constitution, re- specting which he knew" little and cared nothing, heeding it not at all. The second was an equally ardent love of toleration of all opinions ; of tolera- tion, complete, entire, universal, unlimited ; and, as a deduction and corollary from which latter prin- ciple, he felt an intense abhorrence of persecution of every kind, public or private. — T. J. Hogg (" Life of Shelley "). Although the mind of Shelley had certainly a strong bias towards democracy, and he embraced with an ardent and youthful fondness the theory of political equality, his feelings and behavior were in many respects highly aristocratical. ... As a politician, Shelley was in theory wholly a republi- can, but in practice, so far only as it is possible to be one with due regard for the sacred rights of a scholar and a gentleman ; and these being in his eyes always more inviolable than any scheme of polity, or civil institution, although he was upon paper and in discourse a sturdy commonwealth man, the living, moving, acting individual, had much of the senatorial and conservative, and was, in the main, eminently patrician. — T. J. Hogg ("Life of Shelley"). I.-Q Liberty and toleration. Political vieivs. I30 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. A search for evi- dence. Invextigat- in-^ p re- existence. One Sunday we had been reading Plato together so diligently that the usual hour of exercise passed away unperceived ; we sallied forth hastily to take the air for half an hour before dinner. In the mid- dle of Magdalen Bridge we met a woman with a child in her arms. Shelley was more attentive at that instant to our conduct in a life that was past, or to come, than to a decorous regulation of the present, according to the established usages of so- ciety, in that fleeting moment of eternal duration, styled the nineteenth century. With abrupt dex- terity he caught hold of the child. The mother, who might well fear that it was about to be thrown over the parapet of the bridge into the sedgy waters below, held it fast by its long train. *' Will your baby tell us anything about pre-exist- ence, Madam ? " he asked in a piercing voice, and with a wistful look. The mother made no answer, but perceiving that Shelley's object was not murderous, but altogether harmless, she dismissed her apprehension, and re- laxed her hold. *' Will your baby tell us anything about pre-exist- ence,Madam!" he repeated wnth unabated earnestness. " He cannot speak. Sir," said the mother seriously. *' Worse and worse," cried Shelley, with an air of deep disappointment, shaking his long hair most pathetically about his young face ; "but surely the babe can speak if he will, for he is only a few weeks old. He may fancy perhaps that he cannot, but it is only a silly whim ; he cannot have forgotten en- tirely the use of speech in so short a time ; the thing is absolutely impossible." PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 131 " It is not for me to dispute with you, gentlemen," the woman meekly replied, her eye glancing at our academical garb ; ''but I can safely declare that I nev- er heard him speak, nor any child, indeed, of his age." It was a fine, placid boy ; so far from being dis- turbed by the interruption, he looked up and smiled. Shelley pressed his fat cheeks with his fin- gers, we commended his healthy appearance and his equanimity, and the mother was permitted to pro- ceed, probably to her satisfaction, for she would doubtless prefer a less speculative nurse. Shelley sighed deeply as we walked on. '' How provokingly close are those new-born babes ! " he ejaculated ; " but it is not the less certain, notwithstanding the cunning attempts to conceal the truth, that all knowledge is reminiscence ; the doctrine is far more ancient than the times of Plato, and as old as the ven- erable allegory that the Muses are the daughters of Memory ; not one of the nine was ever said to be the child of Invention!"— T. J. Hogg (''Life of Shelley"). Never was there a more unexceptionable dispu- tant ; he was eager beyond the most ardent, but never angry and never personal ; he was the only arguer I ever knew who drew every argument from the nature of the thing, and who could never be provoked to descend to personal contention. He was fully inspired, indeed, with the whole spirit of the true logician ; the more obvious and indisputa- ble the proposition which his opponent undertook to maintain, the more complete was the triumph of his art if he could refute and prevent him. — T. J. Hogg (" Life of Shelley "). Investigat- ing pre- existencc. A good dis* J>utant. 132 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. A passing fancy. A peculiar vie'v of Christian- ity. He had many schemes of life. Amongst them all, the most singular that ever crossed his mind was that of entering the church. Whether he had ever thought of it before, or whether it only arose on the moment, I cannot say : the latter is most probable ; but I well remember the occasion. We were walking in the early summer through a village where there was a good vicarage house, with a nice garden, and the front wall of the vicarage was cov- ered with corchorus in full flower, a plant less com- mon then than it has since become. He stood some time admiring the vicarage wall. The ex- treme quietness of the scene, the pleasant pathway through the village churchyard, and the brightness of the summer morning, apparently concurred to produce the impression under which he suddenly said to me, — *' I feel strongly inclined to enter the church." *'What," I said, *'to become a clergy- man with your ideas of the faith ? " "Assent to the supernatural part of it," he said, ** is merely techni- cal. Of the moral doctrines of Christianity I am a more decided disciple than many of its more osten- tatious professors. And consider for a moment how much good a good clergyman may do. In his teaching as a scholar and a moralist ; in his example as a gentleman and a man of regular life ; in the consolation of his personal intercourse and of his charity among the poor. . . . It is an admira- ble institution which admits the possibility of dif- fusing such men over the surface of the land. And am I to deprive myself of the advantages of this admirable institution because there are certain tech- nicalities to which I cannot give my adhesion, but PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 133 which I need not bring prominently forward ? " I told him I thought he would find more restraint in the office than would suit his aspirations. He walked on some time thoughtfully, then started an- other subject, and never returned to that of enter- ing the church. — T. L. Peacock (Fraser's Maga- zine, June, 1858). The Williamses received me in their earnest, cor- dial manner ; we had a great deal to communicate to each other, and were in loud and animated conver- sation, when I was rather put out by observing in the passage near the open door, opposite to where I sat, a pair of glittering eyes steadily fixed on mine ; it was too dark to make out whom they belonged to. With the acuteness of a woman, Mrs. Williams's eyes followed the direction of mine, and going to the doorway she laughingly said, " Come in, Shelley, it's only our friend Tre just arrived." Sv/iftly gliding in, blushing like a girl, a tall, thin stripling held out both his hands ; and although I could hardly believe as I looked at his flushed, femi- nine, and artless face that it could be the poet, I re- turned his warm pressure. After the ordinary greetings and courtesies he sat down and listened. I was silent with astonishment : was it possible this mild-looking beardless boy could be the veritable monster at w^ar with all the world ? — excommunicated by the Fathers of the Church, deprived of his civil rights by the fiat of a grim Lord Chancellor, dis- carded by every member of his family, and de- nounced by the rival sages of our literature as the A peculiar vie 70 0/ Christian- tty. Captain Trelniimy meets Shel ley at Pisa, 134 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Captaiti Trelaivny fmets Shel- ley at Pisa. founder of a Satanic school ? I could not believe it ; it must be a hoax. He was habited like a boy, in a black jacket and trousers, which he seemed to have outgrown, or his tailor, as is the custom, had most shamefully stinted him in his "sizings." Mrs. Williams saw my embarrassment, and to relieve me asked Shelley what book he had in his hand ? His face brightened, and he answered briskly, " Calder- on's 'Magico Prodigioso,' I am translating some passages in it." "Oh, read it to us !" Shoved off from the shore of commonplace inci- dents that could not interest him, and fairly launched on a theme that did, he instantly became oblivious of everything but the book in his hand. The mas- terly manner in which he analyzed the genius of the author, his lucid interpretation of the story, and the ease with which he translated into our language the 4M^t subtle and imaginative passages of the Span- ish poet, were marvellous, as was his command of the two languages. After this touch of his quality I no longer doubted his identity ; a dead silence en- sued ; looking up, I asked, ''Where is he?" Mrs. Williams said, "Who? Shelley? Oh, he comes and goes like a spirit, no one knows when or where." — E. J. Trelawny (" Records of Shelley, Byron," etc.). Here he wrote the Revolt of Isla??i^ and A Proposal for Putting Reform to the Vote through the Country. . . . He used to sit in a study adorned with casts as large as life of the Vatican Apollo and the celes- PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 135 tial Venus. Between whiles he would ^valk in the garden, or take strolls about the country, or a sail in a boat. . . . Flowers, or the sight of a happy face, or the hearing of a congenial remark would make his eyes sparkle with delight. At other times he would suddenly droop into an aspect of dejec- tion, particularly when a wretched face passed by him. . . . He rose early in the morning, walked and read before breakfast, took that meal sparingly, wrote and studied the greater part of the morning, walked and read again, dined on vegetables (for he took neither meat nor wine), conversed with his friends (to whom his house was ever open), again walked out, and usually finished with reading to his wife till ten o'clock, when he went to bed. This was his daily existence. His book ^vas generally Plato, or Homer, or one of the Greek tragedians, or the Bible, in which last he took a great, though pe- culiar, and often admiring interest. One of his fav- orite parts was the book of Job. — Leigh Hunt (" Autobiography "). On returning to Pisa I found the two poets going through the same routine of habits they had adopted before my departure ; the one getting out of bed afternoon, dawdling about until two or three, following the same road on horseback, stopping at the same Podere, firing his pop-guns, and retracing his steps at the same slow pace ; — his frugal dinner followed by his accustomed visit to an Italian family, and then — the midnight lamp, and the immortal verses. The other was up at six or seven, reading Plato, Sophocles, or Spinoza, \nXh Life at Great Mar^ lo7t\ in 1817. Shelley attd Byron at Pisa. 136 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 'Shelley and By roil at Pisa. The tribute of a content' porary. the accompaniment of a hunch of dry bread ; then he joined Williams in a sail on the Arno, in a flat-bot- tomed skiff, book in hand, and from thence he went to the pine forest, or some out-of-the-way pl?ice. When the birds went to roost he returned home, and talked and read until midnight. The monotony of this life was only broken at long intervals by the arrival of some old acquaintances of Byron's. — E. J. Trelawny (" Records of Shelley, Byron," etc.). Innocent and careless as a boy, he possessed all the delicate feelings of a gentleman, all the discrim- ination of a scholar, and united, in just degrees, the ardor of the poet with the patience and forbearance of the philosopher. His generosity and charity went far beyond those of any man (I believe) at present in existence. He was never known to speak evil of an enemy, unless that enemy had done some grievous injustice to another ; and he divided his income of only one thousand pounds with the fallen and the afflicted. This is the man against whom such clamors have been raised by the religious and the loyal, and by those who live and lap under their tables. — Wal- ter Savage Landor (" Imaginary Conversations").^ On our way to Covent-Garden, I expressed my surprise and dissatisfaction at our strange visit,^ and I learned that when he came to London before, in the course of the summer, some old man had re- ^ Landor (Walter Savage). Works. 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1846. {The passage quoted above does not appear in the later edition, 8 vols., 8vo. London, 1876.) - Shelley had taken his friend to a pawn-broker's shop. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 137 lated to him a tale of distress,^of a calamity which could only be alleviated by the timely application of ten pounds ; five of them he drew at once from his pocket, and to raise the other five he had pawned his beautiful solar microscope ! He related this act of beneficence simply and briefly, as if it were a matter of course, and such it was indeed to him. — T. J. Hogg ("Life of Shelley"). As an instance of Shelley's extraordinary gener- osity, a friend of his, a man of letters, enjoyed from him ... a pension of a hundred a year, though he had but a thousand of his own, and he continued to enjoy it till fortune rendered it superfluous. But the princeliness of his disposition was seen most in his behavior to another friend, the writer of this memoir, who is proud to relate, that with money raised by an effort, Shelley once made him a present of fourteen hundred pounds, to extricate him from debt. I was not extricated, for I had not yet learned to be careful : but the shame of not being so, after such generosity, and the pain w^hich my friend afterward underwent when I was in trouble and he was helpless, were the first causes of my thinking of money-matters to any purpose. His last sixpence was ever at my service, had I chosen to share it. — Leigh Hunt ("Autobiography"). Music affected him deeply. He had also a deli- cate perception of the beauties of sculpture. It is not one of the least evidences of his conscientious turn of mind, that, with the inclination and the power to surround himself in Italy with all the Panvns his vticroscope. Generosity. 138 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Generous self-denial. Instances of his generos- ity. graces of life, he made no sort of attempt that way ; finding other uses for his money, and not always satisfied with himself for indulging even in the lux- ury of a boat. When he bought elegancies of any kind, it was to give away. Boating was his great amusement. He loved the mixture of action and repose which he found in it ; and delighted to fancy himself gliding away to Utopian isles, and bowsers of enchantment. But he would give up any pleas- ure to do a deed of kindness. Indeed, he may be said to have made the whole comfort of his life a sacrifice to what he thought the wants of society. — Leigh Hunt ("Autobiography"). The following summary of instances of Shelley's generosity is taken from J. A. Symonds's recent vol- ume upon Shelley, in the "English Men of Letters" series : ^ — " Peacock received from him an annual allowance of loo/. He gave Leigh Hunt, on one occasion, 1400/. ; and he discharged debts of God- win, amounting, it is said, to about 6000/. In his pamphlet on Putting Refor7n to the Vote., he offered to subscribe 100/. for the purpose of founding an association ; and ... he headed the Tremadoc subscription with a sum of 500/. These instances of his generosity might be easily multiplied ; and when we remember that his present income was 1000/., out of which 200/. went to the support of his children, it will be understood not only that he could not live luxuriously, but also that he was in ' Symonds (John Addington). Shelley. i2mo. London and New York, 1879. (English Men of Letters. Ed. by J. Morley.) PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. r39 frequent money difficulties through the necessity of raising funds upon his expectations. His self-denial in all minor matters of expenditure was conspicu- ous." Shelley married the daughter of Mr. Godwin, and resided at Great Marlow in Buckinghamshire, where my family and myself paid him a visit, and where he was a blessing to the poor. His charity, though liberal, was not weak. He inquired personally into the circumstances of his petitioners ; visited the sick in their beds (for he had gone the rounds of the hospitals on purpose to be able to practise on occasion), and kept a regular list of industrious poor, whom he assisted with small sums to make up their accounts. — Leigh Hunt ("Autobiography"). Shelley tended me like a brother. He applied my leeches, administered my medicines, and during six weeks that I was confined to my room, was as- siduous and unintermitting in his affectionate care of me. — Thomas Medwin (" Life of Shelley "). I was returning home one night to Hampstead after the opera. As I approached the door, I heard strange and alarming shrieks, mixed with the voice of a man. The next day it was reported by the gos- sips that Mr. Shelley, no Christian (for it was he who was there) had brought some ''very strange fe- male " into the house, no better of course, than she ought to be. The real Christian had puzzled them. Shelley, in coming to our house that night, had found a woman lying near the top of the hill in fits. Instances oj his gjneros- ity. Practical charity. The f>oor ivoniati at Hampstead. I40 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. The poor ivoman at Hcunpstead One, yet many. It was a fierce winter night, with snow upon the ground ; and Avinter loses nothing of its fierceness at Hampstead. My friend, always the promptest as well as most pitying on these occasions, knocked at the first houses he could reach, in order to have the woman taken in. The invariable answer, was, that they could not do it. He asked for an outhouse to put her in, while he went for a doctor. Impossible ! In vain he assured them that she was no impostor. . . . The woman was then brought to our house, which was at some distance, and down a bleak path. . . . The doctor said that she would have perished had she lain a short time longer. — Leigh Hunt (''Autobiography "). We must learn to think of Shelley not merely as gentle, dreamy, unworldly, imprudently disinter- ested, and ideally optimistic — though he was all this — but likewise as swift, prompt, resolute, iras- cible, strong-limbed and hardy, often very practical in his views of politics, and endowed with preter- natural keenness of observation. There is but one formula for combining and harmonizing these ap- parent discrepancies : he was an elemental force whose essence is simplicity itself, but whose modes of operation are many and various. If we study the divers ways in which those who shared his so- ciety have striven to express that which they have felt to be inexpressible, we shall find that in the last analysis all amount to this. — Richard Garnett (Fortnightly Review, June, 1878). Note, — Some particulars of Shelley's intercourse with Southey will be found on pp. 240-244. THOMAS MOORE. 1779-1852. INTRODUCTORY NOTE. MEN agree about Moore almost as thoroughly as they differ about Byron and Shelley. Here at least there was no mystery. Brilliant, jovial, kindly ; frivolous, yet hysterically sensitive ; in principle a Whig, in practice a worshipper of aris- tocracy ; a Roman Catholic, but not a bigot ; free — loose even-— in speech and with pen, yet clean in the conduct of his life ; a fond husband, yet always quite prepared to sacrifice his wife's enjoyment to his own — all this, and more, was readily discerned by those who watched this airy little fellow " who wore his heart upon his sleeve." He fluttered gayly through life, winning the ad- miration and applause which he craved, and bearing hardship with a good grace. In common with most sentimentalists, he was very selfish ; but his nature was so superficial, and his egotism was so fully developed, that it may well be doubted if he ever suspected that selfishness might be one of his failings. His amiability, and his many engaging, and even fascinating qualities, secured him a host of friends ; and he can but seldom have inspired any feeling harsher than a good-humored contempt for the weaknesses which were obvious to all. 144 THOMAS MOORE. The chief authority upon Moore's life is his own journal, edited by Lord John Russell. This is one of the most exhausting books in our language ; eight tedious volumes, overflowing with egotism and triviality. Information about him is to be found in many books written by his contemporaries, among which may be noted, S. C. Hall's " Book of Memories ; " N. P. Willis's " PencilUngs by the Way ;" Julian Charles Young's "Memoir of C. M. Young;" the Countess of Blessington's "Conversations of Lord Byron ; " and Leigh Hunt's " Lord Byron and some of his Contemporaries." LEADING EVENTS OF MOORE'S LIFE. 1779. Born, May 28th, in Dublin. 1794. — (Aged 15.) Enters Dublin University. 1799. — (Aged 20.) A law student in the Middle Temple, London. 1800. — (Aged 21.) Publishes a translation of the " Odes of Anac- reon." 1801. — (Aged 22.) Publishes "Poems by Thomas Little." 1803. — (Aged 24.) Goes to Bermuda, upon a government appoint- ment. 1804. — (Aged 25.) Travels in the United States. Returns to England. 1806. — (Aged 27.) Begins the composition of his "Irish Melo- dies." 1 81 1. — (Aged 32.) Marries Miss Elizabeth Dyke. 1817.— (Aged 38.) Publishes "Lalla Rookh." Takes Sloperton Cottage. 1819. — (Aged 40. ) Travels on the Continentwith Lordjohn Russell. 1825. — (Aged 46.) Publishes the "Life of Sheridan." 1830. — (Aged 51.) Publishes the " Life of Byron." 1835. — (Aged 56.) Receives a pension of three hundred pounds per annum. 1852. — (Aged 72 years, 9 months.) Dies, February 25th. THOMAS MOORE. 145 Note. — Lord John Russell edited Moore's "Diary," and stated therein that Moore was born in 1779. The same date was engraved upon the poet's tombstone. If these were errors, it is probable that they would have been corrected at the time by Mrs. Moore, or by others who were able to speak with authority. No such correction was made, although there was one error of Lord Russell's which Mrs. Moore took pains to set right : Lord R gave February 26th, as the day of Moore's death, but Mrs. ]\Ioore stated that he died upon February 25th. It would seem, then, as if the date of Moore's birth was pretty definitely settled. Never- theless, there are several writers, who assert that Moore was bom in 1780. This assertion is based upon a baptismal register, which gives 1780 as the date of Moore's baptism. This, however, is not conclusive evidence, and does not touch the point at issue j for who can tell us what length of time elapsed between the birth and the record of baptism ? In the absence of definite proof that bap- tism immediately followed birth, this record cannot be legitimately used to establish a date subsequent to the one generally received as correct. The weight of evidence is in favor of 1779. The safe rule in regard to baptismal registers is, that they may be trusted to establish priority, but not subsequence of date. L — 10 THOMAS MOORE. HE was a sort of " show-child " from his birth, and could hardly walk when it was jestingly said of him that he passed all his nights with fairies on the hills. '* He lisped in numbers for the numbers came." Almost his earliest memory was his having been crowned king of a castle by some of his play- fellows. At his first school he was the show-boy of the schoolmaster ; at thirteen years old he had written poetry that attracted and justified admira- tion. In 1798, at the age of nineteen he had made " considerable progress " in translating the Odes of Anacreon. — S. C. Hall (" Book of Memories").^ I recall him at this moment, — his small form and intellectual face, rich in expression, and that expres- sion the sweetest, the most gentle, and the kindliest. He had still in age the same bright and clear eye, the same gracious smile, the same suave and win- ning manner, I had noticed as the attributes of his comparative youth : a forehead not remarkably broad or high, but singularly impressive, firm, and ' Hall (Samuel C). A Book of Memories of Great Men and Women of the Age. 4to. London, 1876. Precocity. Personal appearance. 148 THOMAS MOORE. Personal aJ>J>earance. full. . . . The nose . . . was somewhat upturned. Standing or sitting, his head was invari- ably upraised, owing, perhaps, mainly to his short- ness of stature. . . . His hair was, at the time I speak of (in his sixty-fifth year), thin and very grey, and he wore his hat with the "jaunty" air that has been often remarked as a peculiarity of the Irish. In dress, although far from slovenly, he was by no means particular. — S. C. Hall (''Book of Memories "). His forehead is bony and full of character, with "bumps " of wit, large and radiant enough to trans- port a phrenologist. His eyes are as dark and fine, as you would wish to see under a set of vine-leaves ; his mouth generous and good-humored, with dimples ; his nose sensual, prominent, and at the same time the reverse of aquiline. There is a very peculiar character in it, as if it were looking forward, and scenting a feast or an orchard. The face, upon the whole, is Irish, not unruffled with care and passion, but festivity is the prominent expression. — Leigh Hunt (" Lord Byron and his Contemporaries "). To see him only at table, you would think him not a small man His principal length is in his body, and his head and shoulders are those of a much larger person. Consequently he sits tall, and with the peculiar erectness of head and neck, his diminutiveness disappears. . . . Moore's head is distinctly before me as I write, but I shall find it difficult to describe. His hair, which curled once all over it in long tendrils, unlike anybody else's in THOMAS MOORE, 149 the world, and which probably suggested his sobri- quet of " Bacchus," is diminished now to a few curls sprinkled with grey, and scattered in a single ring above his ears. His forehead is wrinkled, with the exception of a most prominent development of the organ of gaiety, w^hich, singularly enough, shines with the lustre and smooth polish of a pearl, and is surrounded by a semicircle of lines drawn close about it, like entrenchments against Time. His eyes still sparkle like a champagne bubble, though the invader has drawn his pencillings about the corners ; and there is a kind of wintry red, of the tinge of an October leaf, that seems enamelled on his cheek, the eloquent record of the claret his wit has bright- ened. His mouth is the most characteristic feat- ure of all. The lips are delicately cut, slight and changeable as an aspen ; but there is a set-up look about the lower lip, a determination of the muscle to a particular expression, and you fancy that you can almost see wit astride upon it. It is written legi- bly with the imprint of habitual success. It is arch, confident, and half diffident, as if he were disguising his pleasure at applause, while another bright gleam of fancy was breaking on him. The slightly tossed nose confirms the fun of the expression, and alto- gether it is a face that sparkles, beams, radiates, — everything hvX feels. Fascinating beyond all men as he is, Moore looks like a worldling. — N. P. Willis (" Pencillings by the Way "^ Nothing but a short-hand report could retain the ^ Willis (Nathaniel P.). Pencillings by the Way. i2mo. New York : Charles Scribner, 1853. Personal a^^earance. 150 THOMAS MOORE. Voice and con7>ersa- tion. delicacy and elegance of Moore's language, and memory itself cannot embody again the kind of frost-work of imagery, which was formed and melted on his lips. His voice is soft or firm as the subject requires, but perhaps the word geiitlemanly describes it better than any other. It is upon a natural key, but, if I may so phrase it, it is /z/^^^ with a high-bred affectation, expressing deference and courtesy, at the same time, that its pauses are constructed peculi- arly to catch the ear. It would be difficult not to attend to him, though the subject were but the shape of a wine-glass. — N. P. Willis (" Pencillings by the Way"). I must say, Moore's tone, in conversation, is per- fect. He appears to me to be as well bred as if he had been born in the circle in which he moves, and in which he is treated by the highest as their peer. He is not devoid of self-complacency — it would be odd if he were — but it is not an offensive self-com- placency : it is innocent and innocuous. He knows his gifts ; and if he did not, all the fine ladies of Lon- don have done their best to enlighten him on that point. — J. C. Young (*' Memoir of C. M. Young," etc.).' '* I never spent an hour with Moore," said Byron, " without being ready to apply to him the expres- sion attributed to Aristophanes, * You have spoken * Young (Julian Charles). A Memoir of Charles M. Young, Tragedian, with Extracts from his Son's Journal. i2mo. London and New York, 187 1. THOMAS MOORE. 151 roses;' his thoughts and expressions have all the beauty and freshness of those flowers, but the piq- ' uancy of his wit, and the readiness of his repar- Conversa- -' ' '^ twn and tees, prevent one's ear being cloyed by too much i sociaigi/ts. sweets, and one cannot ' die of a rose in aromatic pain ' with Moore ; though he does speak roses, there is such an endless variety in his conversation. Moore is the only poet I know," continued Byron, *' whose conversation equals his writings ; he comes into society with a mind as fresh and buoyant as if he had not expended such a multiplicity of thoughts on paper ; and leaves behind him an impression that he possesses an inexhaustible mine equally brilliant as the specimens he has given us. . . . Moore is a delightful companion, gay w^ithout being boisterous, witty without effort, comic v/ith- out coarseness, and sentimental without being lachr)^mose. . . . My tete a tete suppers with Moore are among the most agreeable impressions I retain of the hours passed in London. ... I have known a dull man live on a bon mot of Moore's for a week." — Lady Blessington ("Conversations of Lord Byron "). I was very much struck by his conversation. It was brilliant and sparkling in the highest degree, abounding in those Eastern images and poetical thoughts which appear with such lustre in his *'Lalla Rookh " and "Irish Melodies," mingled with quick repartee and rapid interchange of ideas acquired in the highest and most intellectual London society. It was easy to see that he was thoroughly a poet ; perhaps a little spoilt by the Cofiversa- tion. 152 THOMAS MOORE. Conversa- tion. Singing his oivn songs. adulation he had met with from the most intoxicat- ing of all quarters, that of elegant young women of fashion. Delightful and sociable, when he continued, as he generally was, the idol of the circle, he was apt to be pettish if another shared its attention, and in an especial manner to be jealous of the admiration of young ladies. — Sir A. Alison (''Autobiography"). He makes no attempt at music. It is a kind of admirable recitative, in which every shade of thought is syllabled and dwelt upon, and the sentiment of the song goes through your blood, warming you to the very eyelids, and starting your tears, if you have a soul or sense in you. — N. P. Willis (" Pen- cillings by the Way "). His journals curiously indicate what I repeatedly witnessed in my own house and elsewhere, his mor- bid sensitiveness, when singing his Irish ballads, to the effect they produced on those around him. In the most touching passages his eye was wandering round the room, scrutinizing jealously the influence of his song. — Sir Henry Holland (" Recollec- tions "). He had but little voice, yet he sang with a depth of sweetness that charmed all hearers ; it was true melody, and told upon the heart as well as the ear. No doubt much of this charm was derived from association, for it was only his own melodies he sang.— S. C. Hall (''Retrospect").' ^ Hall (Samuel Carter). Retrospect of a Long Life. Loudon and New York, 1883. 8vo. THOMAS MOORE. 153 "Mr. Moore!" cried the footman at the bottom of the staircase, " Mr. Moore ! " cried the footman at the top. And with his glass at his eye, stumbling over an ottoman between his near-sightedness and the darkness of the room, enter the poet. Half a glance tells you that he is at home on a carpet. Sliding his little feet up to Lady Blessington, . . . . he made his compliments, with a gaiety and an ease combined with a kind of worshipping deference, that was worthy of a prime-minister at the court of love. With the gentlemen, all of whom he knew, he had the frank, merry manner of a con- fident favorite, and he was greeted like one. He went from one to the other, straining back his head to look up at them (for, singularly enough, every gentleman in the room was six feet high and up- ward), and to every one he said something which, from any one else, would have seemed peculiarly felicitous, but which fell from his lips, as if his breath was not more spontaneous. — N. P. Willis (" Pencillings by the Way "). No one can read his poems, or see his deportment in female society, without feeling that his admira- tion, not exclusively for beauty, but for the sex, is intense. I verily believe that, w^ere his doctor to prescribe for him a twelve-months' course of rigid abstinence from female society, the result would be as injurious to his health as it w^ould be for one ad- dicted to dram-drinking to be ordered suddenly to take the tee-total pledge. Although fondly attached to his wife, and with none of the lower propensities which detracted so much from the nobler qualities A dinner at Lady Bless- ington' s in 1835. Gallantry. 154 THOMAS MOORE. Gallafitry, Crcrving for society. ' ToMtJuy loves a lord." of Byron, it cannot be denied that, for many a year, he has lived in a state, more or less feverish, of chronic flirtation : " From beauty still to beauty ranging, In every face he found a dart." — J. C.Young ('' Memoir of Charles M. Young, etc."). I do not fancy that he is a self-sufficing man. I doubt his being content, like Cowper, to live alone, " in some vast wilderness, some boundless contigui- ty of shade." . . . Flis social instincts are too pronounced and too gregarious for seclusion to be otherwise than distasteful to him. . . . The drawing-room is the sphere in which he shines the brightest. What with his singing and his conversa- tional power, and his winning and deferential ad- dress, he is captivating (1836). — J. C. Young ("Me- moir of CM. Young •)• Byron said to Lady Blessington, as she records in her "Conversations of Lord Byron," "The great defect in my friend Tom is a sort of fidgety unset- tledness, that prevents his giving himself up, co/i a7?iore, to any one friend, because he is apt to think he might be more happy with another ; he has the organ of locomotiveness largely developed, as a phrenologist would say, and would like to be at three places at once." His estimates of persons seemed to depend much on their position or rank ; he did not trouble him- self to discuss persons w^ho had no rank at all. In his diary or letters, published in Lord John Russell's memoir, he speaks of being present at two dinners, THOMAS MOORE. 155 viz., at one where the company consisted of "some curious people " (I think that is the phrase), namely, Wordsworth, Lamb, Southey, etc.', and at the other, where he met a '' distinguished circle," consisting of Lord A., Lord B., Lord C, etc., all of whom are now duly forgotten. " Tommy loves a lord," as Lord Byron said of him. — B. W. Procter (''Auto- biographical Fragment ").^ A remark was made,^ in rather a satirical tone, upon Moore's worldliness and passion for rank. *' He was sure," it was said, '' to have four or five in- vitations to dine on the same day, and he tormented himself with the idea that he had not accepted per- haps the most exclusive. He would get off from an engagement with a Countess to dine with a Mar- chioness, and from a Marchioness to accept the later invitation of a Duchess ; and as he cared little for the society of men, and would sing and be delight- ful only for the applause of women, it mattered little whether one circle was more talented than an- other. Beauty was one of his passions, but rank and fashion were all the rest." This rather left- handed portrait was confessed by all to be just. Lady B. herself making no comment upon it. — N. P. Willis (" Pencillings by the Way "). There is a naivete 2i}QO\}X his vanity, which, though it may cause a smile, does not nettle the amour propre ^ Procter (Bryan W.). Autobiographical Fragment, and Bio- graphical Notes, with Sketches of Contemporaries, etc. Ed. by Coventry Patraore. i2mo. London, 1877. 2 At an assembly at Lady Blessington's house. " Tomi7zy loves a lord.^' Beauty, rank, and. fashio7i his chief joys. 156 THOMAS MOORE. of others to whom it is frankly exposed. I remem- ber an instance of it in point. One morning, at Vajtity. breakfast, at Bowood, he mentioned that, when Lockhart was engaged in writing his father-in-law's life, he received a letter from him, requesting him to be kind enough to write for him, for publication, his impression of Sir Walter Scott's ability as a poet and novelist, and his moral and social qualities as a man. He said he had had great pleasure in com- plying with Lockhart's wish ; and had paid an un- grudging tribute of respect to the great and good man's memory : though he owned to having been much mortified at being unable to find an excuse for introducing a word about himself. He mentioned that there was one circumstance connected with his visit to Scott of which he was longing to tell, but which, from a feeling that there ought to be no rival by the side of the principal fig- ure on his canvas, he reluctantly withdrew — viz., the unparalleled reception awarded to himself at the Edinburgh theatre, when accompanying Walter Scott there. '■'• Although," he said, *' I merely went under Scott's wing, and as his guest, and though Scott at the time was the national idol, the moment we appeared, I heard my name cried out. It spread like wildfire through the house. He was nowhere ; and I was cheered and applauded to the very echo. When the Life^ however, came out, I was rewarded for my self-denial by finding that Lockhart himself had done ample justice to the scene." ^ — J. C. Young (** Memoir of C. M. Young," etc.). • Moore took care to give a full account of this event in his Diary — v^hich was undoubtedly written for publication. THOMAS MOORE. 157 Moore, unquestionably, was of the sanguine tem- perament, and, without disparagement to his manli- ness, as hysterical as a woman. That he was quickly moved to smiles, any one who has witnessed his surpassing sense of the ludicrous will readily ac- knowledge * that he was as quickly moved to tears, the following incident will prove. (Mr. Young proceeds to relate, at too great length for quotation, that, at Bowood, the home of Lord Lansdowne, in 1838, a large party was assembled, Moore being one of the guests. Upon this occasion the young widow of the heir of the family, had been induced to make her first appearance in society, since the death of her husband. The story contin- ues as follows :) The piano was wheeled into the middle of the room. He took up his position on the music stool, and the Duchess of Sunderland planted herself on a chair by his side. . . . He happened to be in good voice and high feather. He was evidently flattered by the marked attention with which the Duchess listened to him ; held his head higher than ever in the air, and sang song after song with fault- less articulation and touching expression. All his airs were more or less pathetic. . . . During an interval, . . . the Duke of Sutherland crossed the room, and coming up to Moore, asked him to sing a song for him, of which he had the most agreeable recollection. . . . "There's a song of the olden time Falling sad o'er the ear, Like the notes of some village chime ■ Which in youth we loved to hear." Morbid sen- sibility. Music and hysterics. 158 THOMAS MOORE. Music and hysterics. In old aoe. When he had proceeded with the strain thus far, he happened to turn his head from the Duchess, and glance at the widow. The instant he saw her lovely, sorrow-stricken face, with an abruptness that was fearful, he shrieked aloud, and fell flat on his face to the ground, in violent hysterics. Not a soul moved towards him, except Lord and Lady Lansdowne, who raised him with difficulty from the ground, supported him into the adjoining room, and closed the door. The most embarrassing silence reigned through the drawing-room — a silence only broken by the alternate sobs and laughter of the poet from the next room. — J. C. Young ("Me- moir of Charles M. Young " etc.). The last time I saw Moore was when I was stay- ing in Stratton Street with Miss B. Coutts. This was shortly before his last illness. He called and lunched, and Miss Coutts asked him to stay and dine. Charles Dickens was there that day ; and Moore, who had been buoyant and delightful before he came, became taciturn and sulky after. When he had gone, Moore, evidently contrasting the then reputation of Dickens with his own past celebrity, spoke to me with much chagrin of the fickleness of public opinion and the instability of literary reputation. He said, '* I dare say Dickens is pointed out as ' Boz ' wherever he goes. So was I once pointed out as ' Tom Little.' I can't say how sad I feel when I go to the opera now. I take up my lorgnette and see no one I know, or who knows me. Twenty years ago I flitted from box to box, like a butterfly from flower to flower. Go where I THOMAS MOORE. 159 would I was greeted with smiles. I could not pass through the lobby of a theatre without hearing people whisper as I passed, * That is Tom Moore.' Now^ no one knows me, and no one cares for me. Telle est la vie, Heigho ! " — J. C. Young ('* Memoir of Charles M. Young," etc.). DTsraeli regretted that he should have been met, exactly on his return to London, with the savage but clever article in Frasers Magazine, on his pla- giarisms. ''Give yourself no trouble about that," said Lady Blessington, "for you may be sure he will never see it. Moore guards against the sight and knowledge of criticism as people take precau- tions against the plague. He reads few periodicals, and but one newsDaper. If a letter comes to him from a suspicious quarter, he burns it unopened. If a friend mentions a criticism to him at the club, he never forgives him ; and, so v^^ell is this under- stood among his friends, that he might live in Lon- don a year, and all the magazines might dissect him, and he would probably never hear of it." — N. P. Willis (" Pencillings by the Way "). Breakfasted in bed for the purpose of hastening the remainder of my " Cribb " work. It is singular the difference that bed makes, not only in the facil- ity but the /<2;20' of what I write . . . ; if I did not find that it relaxed me exceedingly, I should pass half my day in bed for the purpose of compo- sition. — Thomas Moore ("Journal," etc.). Mr. S. C. Hall, in his "Book of Memories," de- scribes Moore's cottage at Sloperton. He tells us In old age. Dislike for criticis;u. T1V0 meth- ods of work. i6o THOMAS MOORE. Tivo meth- ods of work. Duel with Jeffrey. that there was a garden and lawn in front, and a kitchen garden behind, and that along this kitchen garden there was a raised bank, which the poet called his ''terrace-walk. Here," Mr. Hall continues. " a small deal table stood through all weathers ; for it was his custom to compose as he walked, and, at this table, to pause and write down his thoughts. He was alwa3^s in motion when he composed. If the v/eather prevented his walking on the terrace, he would pace up and down his small study ; the length of his walk was indicated by the state of the carpet ; the places where his steps turned were, at both ends, worn into holes." (In 1806 there appeared in the Edhtburgh Review a criticism upon a recently published work of Moore's. This criticism so deeply incensed Moore, that he challenged the author, Jeffrey, to mortal combat. The account of this meeting is so charac- teristic of both the men, that I insert it, notwith- standing its length. After describing the prelimi- naries of the duel ; the insulting letter which he wrote to Jeffrey, couched in such terms as to pre- clude all explanation or retraction ; his own utter ignorance of the use of fire-arms ; the choice of seconds, Horner acting for Jeffrey, Hume for him- self, Moore proceeds as follows : — ) The chaise being in readiness, we set off for Chalk Farm. . . . On reaching the ground we found Jeffrey and his party already arrived. . . . And then it was that, for the first time, my excel- lent friend Jeffrey and I met face to face. He was standing with the bag, which contained the pistols. THOMAS MOORE. l6l in his hand, while Horner was looking anxiously around. It was agreed that the spot where we found them, which was screened on one side by large trees, would be as good for our purpose as any we could select ; and Horner, after expressing some anxiety respecting some men whom he had seen suspiciously hovering about, but who now appeared to have de- parted, retired with Hume behind the trees, for the purpose of loading the pistols, leaving Jeffrey and myself together. All this had occupied but a very few minutes. We, of course, had bowed to each other on meeting ; but the first words I recollect to have passed be- tween us was Jeffrey's saying, on our being left together, " What a beautiful morning it is ! " "Yes," I answered with a slight smile, "a morning made for better purposes ; " to which his only response was a sort of assenting sigh. As our assistants were not, any more than ourselves, very expert at warlike matters, they were rather slow in their proceedings ; and as Jeffrey and I walked up and down together, v/e came once in sight of their operations : upon which I related to him, as rather apropos to the purpose, what Billy Egan, the Irish barrister, once said, when, as he was sauntering about in like manner while the pistols were loading, his antagonist, a fiery little fellow, called out to him angrily to keep his ground. " Don't make yourself unaisy, my dear fellow," said Egan ; ''sure isn't it bad enough to take the dose, without being at the mixing up ? " Jeffrey had scarcely time to smile at this story, I. — II Duel with Jeffrey. 1 62 THOMAS MOORE. Duel with Jeffrey. when our two friends, issuing from behind the trees, placed us at our respective posts (the distance, I suppose, having been previously measured by them), and put the pistols into our hands. They then re- tired to a little distance ; the pistols were on both sides raised ; and we waited but the signal to fire, when some police officers, whose approach none of us had noticed, and who were within a second of being too late, rushed out from a hedge behind Jeffrey ; and one of them, striking at Jeffrey's pistol with his staff, knocked it to some distance into the field, while another running over to me, took pos- session also of mine. We were then replaced in our respective carriages, and conveyed, crestfallen, to Bow Street. On our way thither Hume told me, that from Horner not knowing anything about the loading of pistols he had been obliged to help him in the operation, and in fact to take upon himself chiefly the task of loading both pistols. When we arrived at Bow Street, the first step of both parties was to despatch messengers to procure some friends to bail us. . . . In the meanwhile we were all shown into a sitting-room, the people in attendance having first inquired whether it was our wish to be separated, but neither party having expressed any desire to that effect, we were all put together in the same room. Here conversation upon some literary subject, I forget what, soon ensued, in which I my- self took only the brief and occasional share, beyond which, at that time of my life, I seldom ventured in general society. But whatever was the topic, Jef- frey, I recollect, expatiated upon it with all his pe- THOMAS MOORE. 163 culiar fluency and eloquence ; and I can now most vividly recall him to my memory, as he lay upon his back on a form which stood beside the wall, pouring volubly forth his fluent but most oddly pronounced diction, and dressing this subject out in every variety of array that an ever rich and ready wardrobe of phraseology could supply. I have been told of his saying, soon after our ren- contre, that he had taken a fancy to me from the first moment of our meeting together in the field ; and I can truly say that my liking for him is of the same date.' — Thomas Moore ("Journal," etc.). Reference to his journal will show that, of all his contemporaries — whenever he spoke of them — he had something kindly to say. There is no evidence of ill-nature in any case — not a shadow of envy or jealousy. — S. C. Hall (*'A Book of Memories"). I do not think he would willingly calumniate or even disparage ; if he could not speak well of a man, he would abstain from speaking ill of him. — J. C. Young (" Memoir of C. M. Young "). To his mother — ... a humbly-descended, homely, and almost uneducated woman — Moore gave intense respect and devoted affection, from the time that reason dawned upon him to the hour of her death. To her he wrote his first letter (in 1793), . . . and in the zenith of his fame, when society drew largely on his time, and the highest and best ' The result was that the duelists were bound over to keep the peace, and soon after met at Rogers's house, settled their difficulty amicably, and became intimate friends. Duel Tvit/t Jeffrey. Kindly judgments of men. Devotion to his mother. 1 64 THOMAS MOORE. Devotion to his mother. Leigh Hu?tfs cpinio7i. Cheerful- ness and honesty. in the land coveted a portion of his leisure, with her he corresponded so regularly that at her death she possessed (so Mrs. Moore told me) four thousand of his letters. Never, according to the statement of Earl Russell, did he pass a week without writing to her twice^ except while absent in Bermuda, when franks were not to be obtained, and postages were costly. — S. C. Hall ("Book of Memories "). Mr. Moore was lively, polite, bustling, full of amen- ities and acquiescences, into which he contrived to throw a sort of roughening of cordiality, like the crust of old port. It seemed a happiness to him to say '* Yes." There was just enough of the Irishman in him to flavor his speech and manner. He was a little particular, perhaps, in his ortheopy, but not more so than became a poet : and he appeared to me the last man in the world to cut his country even for the sake of high life. — Leigh Hunt (" Lord Byron and his Contemporaries "). Moore is still more delightful in society than he is in his writings; the sweetest-blooded, warmest- hearted, happiest, hopefulest creature that ever set fortune at defiance. He was quite ruined about three years ago by the treachery of a deputy in a small office he held, and was forced to reside in France. He came over since I came to England, to settle his debts by the sacrifice of every farthing he had in the world, and had scarcely got to London when he found that the whole scheme of settlement had blown up, and that he must return in ten days to his exile. And yet I saw nobody so sociable, kind and happy ; so resigned, or rather so trium- THOMAS MOORE. 165 phant over fortune, by the 'buoyancy of his spirits and the inward light of his mind. — Francis Jeffrey (From a letter written in 1822). There have been many who would suffer the ex- treme of penury rather than borrow — such . . . was Thomas Moore, to whom the purses of wealthy and high-born friends were as sacred as the Crown- jewels. — S. C. Hall (''Book of Memories"). I knew him well, and, rating him as a poet much lower than you do, delighted in him as a companion and wit — the most perfectly graceful, genial, and kindly of all wits. As a family man, he was, I be- lieve, more than usually amiable. My acquaintance with him was in town, but a dear friend of mine was his' near neighbor and Mrs. Moore's intimate friend at Sloperton, and she says that she never knew a more exemplary husband and father. — Mary Rus- sell MiTFORD (" Friendships of M. R. Mitford ").' In a recently published volume upon Moore, by A. J. Symington,^ I jSnd the following estimate of Moore, written by William Howitt, who knew him : — *' It is as useless to wish Moore anything but what he was, as to wish a butterfly a bee, or that a moth should not fly into a candle. It was his nature ; and the pleasure of being caressed, flattered, and admired by titled people must be purchased at any 1 L' Estrange (Rev. A. G.). The Friendships of Mary Russell Mitford, as recorded in Letters from her Literary Correspondents. i2nio. New York, 1882. ^ Symington (Andrew James). Thomas Moore, his Life and Works. Cheerful- ness and Jwnesty, A womatCs opinion : a good hus- band and father. General view of his character. 1 66 THOMAS MOORE. General r;iew of his character. cost. Neither poverty nor sorrow could restrain him from this dear enjoyment. We find him one moment overwhelmed by some death or distress amongst his nearest relatives or in the very bosom of his family. Nev/s arrives that a son is ill in a far-off land, or a daughter is dead at home. In the very next entry in his diary he has rushed away with his grief into some fashionable concert, where he sings and breaks down in tears. . . . He goes into the charmed, glittering ring to forget his trouble, and leaves poor, desolate Mrs. Moore soli- tarily at home to remember it. *'At another time you find him invited to dine with some great people, but he has not a penny in his pocket ; Bessy, however, has scraped together a pound or two out of the housekeeping cash, and lets him have it, and he is off. *' And yet this strange little fairy was a most af- fectionate husband, son, and brother. We find him and his wife staying at Lord Moira's for a week be- yond the time that they should have left, because they had not money enough to give to the servants. Thus, night after night, season after season, he is the flattered and laughing centre of the most brill- iant circles of lords and ladies, while he and his wife, in the daytime, are at their wits* end to find the means of meeting the demands of their humble menage. He is joking and carrolling like a lark, while his thoughts are, at every pause, running on how that confounded bill is to be taken up. All the time, his wife is sitting solitarily at home pondering on the same thing, and cannot call on her friends because it would necessitate the hire of a coach." SAMUEL ROGERS. 1763-1855. INTRODUCTORY NOTE. ROGERS used to tell, in his old age, how on a certain day long ago, when he was an unknown youth, he w^ent to a house in London and knocked for admittance. Presently he heard a shuffling sound, as of an old man moving about within. He did not wait until the door was opened, but fled precipi- tately, dismayed by the approach of the man w^hom he longed to see. We can fancy the opening of that door, we can almost see the unwieldy frame and dis- ordered garb of him who stood for a moment upon the threshold, rolling his great head and peering forth into the vacancy of Bolt Court — for it was Samuel Johnson to whom young Rogers went to pay his respects. Rogers remembered the oratory of Burke, the acting of Garrick. He was thirteen years old at the time of the American revolution ; and yet some of us can recall how we laughed, only a few years ago, when his peculiarities of voice and manner were mimxicked by Charles Dickens, in his reading of "Justice Stareleigh," the judge of the " Pickwick " trial. In his youth Rogers wished to become a dissent- ing minister, but his father prevented him from do- I/O SAMUEL ROGERS. ing so by taking him into his bank. He remained constant throughout his life to the principles in which he was born and bred, adhering in religion to the dissenters, and in politics to the whigs. His frequent visits to the continent, and the publication of his various works, were the only incidents which disturbed the even course of his life. His long bachelorhood was uneventful, but it derives consid- erable interest from the curious variety of aspects in which he appeared. He was a successful banker ; an intelligent and generous patron of literature and art ; a laborious scholar and author ; and a leader in literary society, where he was by turns courted for his wit, and dreaded for the cruelty with which he exercised it. His character shows a singular combination of benevolence and malignity. The nearest approach that has been made to a life of Rogers is a sketch by his nephew, Samuel Sharpe, which was privately printed in London, in 1859, and has since been published in several editions of Rogers's poetical works. Alexander Dyce published a volume of his table-talk. In addition to these works the following volumes may be mentioned : William Jerdan's, ''Men I have Known," and the " Autobiography " of the same writer ; P. G. Pat- more's *' My Friends and Acquaintances ; " S. C. Hall's "Book of Memories ;" James T. Fields's "Old Acquaintance;" C. R. Leslie's ''Autobiography;" Abraham Hayward's "Essays;" H. F. Chorley's "Autobiography ; " Harriet Martineau's " Biograph- ical Sketches ;" Henry Crabb Robinson's " Diary ;" and Thomas Moore's "Journal." SAMUEL ROGERS. 1 71 LEADING EVENTS OF ROGERS'S LIFE. 1763. Born, July 30th, at Stoke Newington, a suburb of London. 1781. — (Aged 18.) Contributes to the Gentleman'' s Magazine. 1786. — (Aged 23.) Publishes "An Ode to Superstition." 1792. — (Aged 29.) Publishes " The Pleasures of Memory." 1812. — (Aged 49.) Publishes *' Columbus." 1814. — (Aged 51.) Publishes "Jacqueline." 1819. — (Aged 56.) Publishes "Human Life." 1822. — (Aged 59.) Publishes the first part of "Italy." 1828.— (Aged 65.) Publishes the second part of "Italy." 1855. — (Aged 92 years, 4 months.) Dies, December i8th. Note. — Rogers was privately educated, and entered his father's banking-house. Precise dates of events in his life, from his first to his eighteenth year, are not obtainable. SAMUEL ROGERS, HIS personal appearance was extraordinary, or rather, his countenance was unique. His skull and facial expression bore so striking a likeness to the skeleton pictures which we sometimes see of Death, that the facetious Sydney Smith (at one of the dressed evening parties . . . ) entitled him the ^' Death-dandy ! " And it was told (probably with truth) that the same satirical wag inscribed upon the capital portrait in his breakfast-room, "Painted in his life-time." — W. Jerdan ("Men I have Known")/ There is something preternatural in the cold, clear, marbly paleness that pervades, and, as it were, penetrates his features to a depth that seems to preclude all change, even that of death itself. Yet there is nothing in the least degree painful or re- pulsive in the sight, nothing that is suggestive of death. — P. G. Patmore (" My Friends and Acquaint- ance ").* ' Jerdan (W^illiam). Men I have Known. 8vo. London, 1866. ' Patmore (Peter George). My Friends and Acquaintance. 3 vols. Svo. London, 1854. Perso7ial appearance. 174 SAMUEL ROGERS. Personal apjiearance. A man evidently aged, yet remarkably active, though with a slight stoop and grizzled hair ; not, to my thinking, with a pleasant countenance ; cer- tainly not with the frank and free expression of a poet who loved and lived with Nature ; . . . He did not often smile, and seldom laughed. — S. C. Hall (" Book of Memories "). His countenance was the theme of continued jokes. It was "ugly," if not repulsive. The ex- pression w^as in no w^ay, nor under any circumstances, good ; he had a drooping eye and a thick under lip ; his forehead was broad, his head large — out of pro- portion, indeed, to his form. . . . His features were "cadaverous." Lord Dudley once asked him why, now that he could afford it, he did not set up his hearse ; and it is said, that Sydney Smith once gave him mortal offence by recommending him, "when he sat for his portrait, to be drawn saying his prayers, v/ith his face hidden by his hands." — S. C. Hall (" Book of Memories"). His head was very fine, and I never could quite understand the satirical sayings about his personal appearance which have crept into the literary gossip of his time. He was by no means the vivacious spectre some of his contemporaries have repre- sented him, and I never thought of connecting him with that terrible line in the " Mirror of Magis- trates ; " — " His withered fist still striking at Death's door." His dome of brain w^as one of the amplest and most SAMUEL ROGERS. 175 perfectly shaped I ever saw, and his countenance was very far from unpleasant. His faculties to en- joy had not perished with age. He certainly looked like a well-seasoned author, but not dropping to pieces yet. — James T. Fields (" Old Acquaintance ").' My first look at the poet, then in his seventy- eighth year, was an agreeable surprise, and a pro- test in my mind against the malignant injustice which had been done him. As a young man he might have been uncomely if not as ugly as his re- vilers had painted him, but as an old man there was an intellectual charm in his countenance and a fascination in his manner which more than atoned for any deficiency of personal beauty. — Charles Mackay (" Forty Years' Recollections ").^ Several times, at Pet worth, we met Mr. Rogers. I recollect that, one evening, all the young ladies in the house, formed a circle round him, listening with extreme interest to a series of ghost stories which he told with great effect. Indeed, while he stayed at Petworth, the beaux there had little chance of engaging the belles, when he was in the room. His manner of telling a story was perfect. I re- member only one other person, the late Lady Hol- land, who, like him, used the few^est words with the greatest possible effect ; sometimes more than sup- * Fields (James T.). Old Acquaintance : Barry Cornwall and some of his Friends. 32mo. Boston : J. R. Osgood & Co. 1876. 2 Mackay (Charles). Forty Years' Recollections, from 1830 to 1870. 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1877. Personal af>pearaiice. Conversa- tion. 176 SAMUEL ROGERS. Conversa- tion. Dickens's invitation o/ //is manner of telling a story. plying the omission of a word by a look, or a gest- ure. Rogers told his stories as in prose he wrote them. The story of '' Marcolini " in his " Italy," for instance, could not have better words, nor fewer, without loss of interest. — C. R. Leslie (" Autobio- graphical Recollections ").^ My uncle's conversation could hardly be called brilliant. He seldom aimed at wit, though he en- joyed it in others. He often told anecdotes of his early recollections and of the distinguished persons with whom he had been acquainted. These he told with great neatness and fitness in the choice of words, as may be understood by an examination of the prose notes to his poems. But the valuable part of his conversation was his good sense joined with knowledge of literature and art, and yet more particularly his constant aim at improvement, and the care that he took to lead his friends to what was worth talking about. — Samuel Sharpe (" Some Par- ticulars of the Life of S. Rogers ").^ In Percy Fitzgerald's *' Recreations of a Literary Man," there is a story of Dickens's imntation of Ro- gers, which, although in very bad taste, is too sug- gestive to be omitted : — " I recall his filling more than an hour with some sketches of * Old Rogers,' the poet, and of his mode of telling a story. Those ^ Leslie (Charles Robert). Autobiographical Recollections. Ed. by Tom Taylor. 2 vols. i2mo. London, i860. ^ This sketch was privately printed in London, in 1859. since been published in several editions of R.'s poenms. It has SAMUEL ROGERS. 177 who attended the Readings will recall Justice Stare- leigh : the strangely obtuse and owl-like expression, and the slow, husky croak with which the words were projected. This was borrowed from the ' Poet of Memory,' and many were the stories he told in his manner. The old man would relate his cut-and- dried ^ tales,' always in the same fashion, and 'go on,' like a wheezy musical box, on the smallest in- vitation. Sometimes Dickens would go and dine with him, and he described the scene as piteously grotesque, a faithful man-servant cheerily suggest- ing the old stories which they knew by heart. Thus : * Tell Mr. Dickens, sir, the story of the Hon. Charles Townshend and the beautiful Miss Curzon.' The old poet would start in a slow, almost Grego- rian tone, and in curious old-fashioned phrase : 'The Hon-or-able Charles Townshend' (this name will serve as well as another) 'became enamored of Miss Curzon. She was beeyewtiful. He beribed her maid to conceal him in her cheeamber, and when she arrived to dress for a ball, emerged from his hiding-place. She looked at him fixedly, then said : "Why don't you begin ? " She took hi?nfor the 'air-dresser / '" * He was a great walker, and it was his daily cus- tom after breakfast (which was often a long meal, as he was fond of company at his breakfast-table) to go out and spend the greater part of the day in the open air, quite regardless of the weather, of which he never complained. — C. R. Leslie ("Auto- biographical Recollections "). « See pp. 182, 183, 187. Dickens's imitation oj his manner- of telling a story. A great 7valker. I.— 12 1/8 SAMUEL ROGERS. Not afraid of jfoul 7vsather. Ohservation of nature. Good taste. On occasions when he attended meetings of the Royal Society, ... at the close, let the night be ever so severe, if rain or snow were falling, he was invariably seen buttoning up his great-coat in preparation for a walk home. On one occasion I ventured to say to him, ..." Mr. Rogers, it is a very wet night ; I have a fly at the door : may I have the honor to leave you at your house ? " but the invitation was declined ; the old man faced the weather, from which younger and stronger men would have wisely shrunk. — S. C. Hall ("Book of Memories "). In Mr. Clayden's biography of Rogers's nephew, Samuel Sharpe,^ the following extract from Sharpe's diary is printed : " He said he never, when he could help it, missed seeing the sunset, and regretted that by being in bed we lost the sunrise. He often felt inclined to stop the people in the streets to show them a glorious sky. Looking at such wonders of nature he thought should be cultivated as a habit." Whatever place may be assigned to Samuel Ro- gers among poets, he deserves to hold the high- est place among men of taste, not merely of taste for this or that, but of general good taste in all things. He was the only man I have ever known (not an artist) who felt the beauties of art like an artist. He was too quiet to exercise the influence he should have maintained among the patrons of art ; - Clayden (P. W.). Samuel Sharpe, Egyptologist and Transla- tor of the Bible. 8vo. London, 1883. ' '■ ' - ^ muj y \ 'J iJ F- J i » 1 1 « I ■ I SAMUEL ROGERS. 179 but, as far as his own patronage extended, it was most useful. He employed, and always spoke his mind in favor of, Flaxman, Stothard, and Turner, when they were little appreciated by their country- men. The proof of his superior judgment to that of any contemporary collector of art or vertu is to be found in the fact that there was nothing in his house that was not valuable. In most other collec- tions with which I am acquainted, however fine the works of art, or however rare the objects of curi- osity, I have always found something that betrayed a want of taste — an indifferent picture, a copy pass- ing for an original, or something vulgar in the way of ornament. — C. R. Leslie (*' Autobiographical Recollections"). In his writings, as in his daily life, Mr. Rogers was fastidious. In correcting the press, only Camp- bell could equal him for anxiety to polish. On one occasion I chanced to see a sheet of one of his poems C Italy," I think) as it was passing through the printer's hands, and pointed out some very slight errors. The reader told him of this hyper- criticism (for it was nothing more), and he cancelled the whole of the impression, and introduced the re- quired alteration at the expense of above one hun- dred pounds. In other respects he would not be guilty of anything like extravagance. On the con- trary, there was a curious spice of the miser-economy in his nature. — W. Jerdan (" Men I have Known"). One Friday afternoon, when I went as usual to my printer's, ... to correct the last proofs, Good taste. Fastidious- ness. 8o SAMUEL ROGERS. Costly accu- racy. Composition a slo7v and laborious process. Musical taste : an or^an- gj-inder in the hall. . . . I happened to glance over some loose sheets lying on the desk of Rogers's " Italy " (I think). I pointed out two or three of the slightest inaccu- racies or doubtful points to the reader, . . . which he communicated to the poet, and the result was the cancelling of several sheets, at an expense of fifty or sixty pounds. The majority of writers w^ould not have given sixpence to mend them all. Not so the fastidious Rogers. — W. Jerdan (" Auto- biography "). Writing with great difficulty himself, he dispar- aged and undervalued all who wrote with facility ; and boasted to me that he had employed three weeks in writing a short note to Lord Melbourne, to sug- gest the bestowal of a pension. . . . There was not a word in it, he said, which he had not studied and weighed, and examined, so as to assure himself that it could not be omitted or exchanged for a better. — Charles Mackay ("Forty Years' Recollec- tions "). Rogers's musical taste was a natural gift, the result of organization, and partook very slightly of the acquired or conventional quality. He delighted in sw^eet sounds, in soft flowing airs, ... in simple melodies, rather than in complicated harmo- nies. . . . Amongst Italian composers, Bellini was his favorite. Although he was a constant at- tendant at the concerts of ancient and sacred music, he had slight relish for the acknowledged master- pieces of Handel, Beethoven, or Mozart. When he dined at home and alone, it was his custom to have an Italian organ-grinder playing in the SAMUEL ROGERS. I8l hall/ . . . He kept nightingales in cages on his staircase and in his bedroom, closely covered up from the light, to sing to him. — x\non. {Edinbui'gh Review^ July, 1856). Those who know Rogers only from his writings, can have no conception of his humor. I have seen him, in his old age, imitate the style of dancing of a very great lady with an exactness that made it much more ludicrous than any caricature ; and I remem- ber, when I met him at Cassiobury, that he made some droll attack, I quite forget what it was about, on one of the company, and went on heightening the ridicule at every sentence, till his face ''was like a wet cloak ill laid up," as were the faces of all present, and especially the face of the gentleman he was attacking. At an evening party, at which I met him, the the oddest looking little old lady, for she was as broad as she was long, and most absurdly dressed, as she was leaving the room saw him near the door, and accosted him : " How do you do, Mr. Rogers ? It is very long since I have seen you, and I don't think, now, you know who I am." " Could I ever forget you ! " He said it with such an emphasis that she squeezed his hand with delight. — C. R. Leslie (" Autobiographical Recollections "). Rogers was unceasingly at war with the late Lady Davy. One day at dinner she called across the ^ It is amusing, in this connection, to remember that Dickens wrote to Forster that he had bought a new accordeon, upon which he played for the benefit of the passengers, while on his first voy- age to this country. 1 82 SAMUEL ROGERS. Humor, Insincerity. table ; " Now, Mr. Rogers, I am sure you are talk- ing about me " (not attacking, as the current ver- sion runs). "Lady Davy," was the retort, " I pass my life in defending you." — A. Hayward ("Es- says ").^ I soon discovered that it was the principle of his sarcastic wit not only to sacrifice all truth to it, but even all his friends, and that he did not care to knovv^ any who would not allow themselves to be abused for the purpose of lighting up his breakfast with sparkling wit, though not quite, indeed, at the expense of the persons then present. I well remem- ber, on one occasion . . . Mr. Rogers was en- tertaining us with a volume of sarcasms upon a disagreeable lawyer, who made pretensions to knowl- edge and standing not to be borne ; on this occasion the old poet went on, not only to the end of the breakfast, but to the announcement of the very man himself on an accidental visit, and then, with a bland smile and a cordial shake of the hand, he said to him, " My dear fellow, w^e have all been talking about you up to this very minute," — and looking at his company still at table, and with a significant wink, he, with extraordinary adroitness and experienced tact, repeated many of the good things, reversing the meaning of them, and giving us the enjoyment of the double ente?idre. The visitor w^as charmed, nor even dreamed of the ugliness of his position. . . . I should be unjust to the venerable poet ' Hayward (Abraham). Biographical and Critical Essays, vols. 8vo. London, 1858. SAMUEL ROGERS. 183 not to add, that notwithstanding what is here related of him, he oftentimes showed himself the generous and noble-hearted man. — Joseph Severn (Atlantic Monthly, April, 1863). He was, plainly speaking, at once a flatterer and a cynic. It was impossible for those who knew him best to say, at any moment, whether he w^as in earnest or covert jest. Whether he was ever in earnest, there is no sort of evidence but his acts ; and the consequence w^as that his flattery went for nothing, except with novices, w^hile his causti- city bit as deep as he intended. He would begin with a series of outrageous compliments, in a meas- ured style which forbade interruption ; and, if he was allowed to finish, w^ould go away and boast how much he had made a victim swallow. He would accept a constant seat at a great man's table, flatter his host to the top of his bent, and then, as is upon record, go away and say that the company there was got up by conscription — that there were two parties before whom everybody must appear, his host and the police. When it was safe, he would try his sarcasms on the victims themselves. A mul- titude of his sayings are rankling in people's mem- ories which could not possibly have had any other origin than the love of giving pain. Some are so atrocious as to suggest the idea that he had a sort of psychological curiosity to see how people could bear such inflictions. — Harriet Martineau ("Bio- graphical Sketches").^ ' Martineau (Harriet), don, 1869. Biographical Sketches. i2mo. Lon- A Jlatterer a7id a cynic. 84 SAMUEL ROGERS, Wilful rudeness. Gratuitous brutality. Few old men have ever shown a more mortifying behavior to a young one than Mr. Rogers, from the first to the last, displayed towards me. There was no doubting the dislike which he had conceived for me, and which he took every possible pains to make me feel. . . . Whatever the cause might be, he did his best to make me feel small and uncomforta- ble ; and it was often done by repeating the same discouragement. The scene would be a dinner of eight ; at which he would say, loud enough to be heard, ''Who is that young man with red hair?" (meaning me). The ansAver would be, "Mr. Chor- ley," et cetera^ et cetera. " Never heard of him be- fore," was the rejoinder : after which Rogers would turn to his dinner, like one, who, having disposed of a nuisance, might unfold his napkin, and eat his soup in peace. — H. F. Chorley ("Autobiography").' I always considered myself the person to whom Rogers made his most gratuitously ill-natured speech. . . . It was at the Aiitient Concerts, on a night when the room was crowded, . . . and when every seat was occupied. Mine was at the end of a bench, by the side of the Dowager Lady Essex (Miss Stephens that had been). She was one of Rogers's prime favorites. . . . He loved to sit next her, and pay her those elegant and courteous compliments, the art of paying which is lost. When I saw the old gentleman creeping down the side avenue betwixt the benches, at a loss for a seat, I ^ Chorley (Henry F.). Autobiography, Memoir, and Letters. Compiled by H. G. Hewlett. 2 vols. T2mo. London, 1873. SAMUEL ROGERS. 185 said, ^^ Now I shall give up my place to Mr. Rogers; good-flighty While I was stooping for my hat, "Come," said she, in her cordial way, "come, Mr. Rogers, here is a seat for you by me." " Thank you," said the civil old gentleman, fixing his dead eyes on me, as I was doing my best to get out of the way ; ''thank you ; but I don't like your company. — H. F. Chorley (" Autobiography "). May df, 185 1. Forster called; w^ent with him to Rogers. Found the old man very cheerful, thinner than when I last saw him, but in very good spirits. He told all his stories ''over again." ... Took leave of dear old Rogers once more. I think indeed for the last time. I cannot make out his character. He is surely good-natured, with philanthropic and religious feelings, but his fondness for saying a sharp thing shakes one's certainty in him : his ap- parent desire too to produce effect, I think, some- times awakens doubts of his sincerity in some minds. — W. C. Macready (" Reminiscences ").^ He was one of those few instances in which talent is found united with wealth and energetic labor. In his literary work he was most persevering ; so much so that he spent no less than seventeen years in writing and revising " The Pleasures of Memory." But Rogers was not only a wealthy banker and rural poet ; he had also a keen sense of humor, and there ' Macready (William Charles). Reminiscences and Selections from his Diaries and Letters. Ed. by Sir F. Pollock. 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1875. Gratuitous brutality. In doubt concerjting his charac- ter. Various character- istics. 1 86 SAMUEL ROGERS, Various character- istics. Contradic- tion of character increased by age. A cold critic. was something in the deadness of his countenance and the dryness of his manner which seemed to give additional point to his sarcasms. . . . Lord Lansdowne once spoke to him in congratulatory terms about the marriage of a common friend. " I do not think it so desirable," observed Rogers. " No ! " replied Lord Lansdowne, '' why not ? His friends approve of it ! " *' Happy man ! " returned Rogers, " to satisfy all the world. His friends are pleased, and his enemies a7'e delighted ! " — A. G. L'EsTRANGE ("Life of W. Harness"). As age advanced upon him, the admixture of the generous and malignant in him became more sin- gular. A footman robbed him of a large quantity of plate ; and of a kind which was inestimable to him. He was incensed, and desired never to hear of the fellow more, — the man having absconded. Not many months afterward Rogers was paying the passage to New York of the man's wife and family — somebody having told him that that family junc- tion might afford a chance of the man's reformation. Such were his deeds at the very time that his tongue was dropping verjuice, and his wit w^as sneering behind backs at a whole circle of old friends and hospitable entertainers. — Harriet Mar- TiNEAU (" Biographical Sketches "). Anything approaching hilarity, aught akin to en- thusiasm, to a genuine flow of heart and soul, was foreign to his nature — or, at all events, seemed to be so. Yet, of a surety, he was a keen observer ; he looked " quite through the deeds of men ; " and his '.^