:^^€^ \ ^i f. ,. '''u iV ^^^ ^^^ .^^^.% '-'\^'' .-«*% .\' ,0- O, * ^ -^..^ •^-t 0' \ ' « * -^r^ « . O r. "'^0^ '^^ v^^ ■^- /\ lW#.." .?.'>' "-^A, '^- ^^^ ,0^ "^ -i. A. » >■ ,\ ^'^P^s* ,^X ^ A^ „ V . . , ^-<. ,0 o^ ■■V -0^ *. -i^. ^' ^^/r^^ "': c ,^^ 't.. '. \^\s^^. \ , N C „ -/- -1 'f ■V ''°^ ' * /i^" v^- i "^f" ;ii v/. V- \- ■^:c^<\oNc;v'''^- ^\,^-^-^.%^ ■1 « <: THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE r VJ' ^ - i ?' *1 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE BY JOHN PHILIP HILL FOEMBKLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTOKNEY FOB MARYLAND BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY 1916 ^Y" COPYRIGHT, 1916, BY JOHN PHILIP HILL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Published April iqib APR 10 1916 ^CI.A428445 PREFACE Even since 1903, when this book was started, many- important changes have occurred in the Federal Execu- tive. In 1903 there was no single book that adequately treated the President's Cabinet and the executive de- partments. Since then several books on aspects of this general subject have been written. With a few excep- tions (notably Dr. Learned's admirable book on The President's Cabinet, Dr. Fairlie's The National Adminis- tration, and Mr. Haskin's The American Government), these are merely compilations from the annual reports of the heads of the executive departments, and other government publications. The development and delim- itation of the functions of the Executive are an index of the growth of the Federal Government. Much remains to be written about it. In 1903 I was Assistant in Gov- ernment in two courses given at Harvard by Pro- fessor Frederic J. Stimson and the Honorable Charles S. Hamlin dealing with American Government. In 1905 I gave seven lectures at Johns Hopkins for Dr. W. W. Willoughby on "The Executive Administration of the United States"; in the spring of 1912, at Goucher Col- lege, three lectures on the " Creation and Development of the Cabinet" ; and in November, 1912, two lectures at the University of Virginia, one on "The Growth of the Cabinet-Council Idea in the Federal Executive" and vi PREFACE the'other on " The Department of Justice." The purpose of this book, based upon the above lectures, is to add a little to the studies on the subject and to assist in an understanding of the creation, development, organiza- tion, and functions of the Federal Executive. To-day, the population of the United States is 101,208,315, ex- clusive of Alaska and the insular possessions. These people and their vast riches are not adequately pro- tected from foreign interference. A thorough under- standing of the Federal Government of to-day is the first step toward proper National Defense. John Philip Hill. 3 West Franklin Street, Baltimore, February, 1916. CONTENTS I. The Federal Government 1 II. Creation of the Executive Departments and the Cabinet 12 III. Development op the Executive Departments and the Cabinet * ... 27 IV. Status op the Heads of the Executive Depart- ments collectively, as an Advisory Council or Cabinet 41 V. Status op the Heads op the Executive Depart- ments individually, as Constitutional Offi- cers OF THE Government 52 VI. Organization op the Executive Departments . 65 VII. Functions of the Executive Departments in Main- taining A " More Perfect Union." The Depart- ments op State, the Treasury, and the Interior 76 VIII. Functions of the Executive Departments in "Insuring Domestic Tranquillity." The De- partments OF War, the Navy, and Justice . 121 IX,. Functions op the Executive Departments in "Promoting the General Welfare." The De- partments op Agriculture, Commerce, and Labor 158 viii CONTENTS X. Functions op the Executive Departments in Se- curing Certain op "The Blessings of Liberty." The Post-Officb Department 182 XI. The Chief Executives and the Development of THE Executive Departments 194 XII. Probable Developments in the Federal Execu- tive 215 APPENDIX A. List of Presidents and Vice-Presidents and the Length of Service rendered 239 B. The Constitution of the United States of America 240 INDEX 259 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE CHAPTER I THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Lord Bryce, in his introduction to the most recent edition of "The American Commonwealth," says, "Thoughtful Europeans have begun to realize, whether with satisfaction or regret, the enormous and daily in- creasing influence of the United States." Most Ameri- cans are so occupied with the myriad interests that are creating this enormous and increasing power that they do not realize the great changes that are going on in the Government of the United States itself. In October, 1914, the American Bar Association celebrated at Wash- ington the one hundred and twenty-fifth anniversary of the Supreme Court. In this century and a quarter, al- though the questions with which it deals are somewhat different from those it considered in 1789, the organ- ization and functions of the Supreme Court have not changed. Should a celebration be held of the one hun- dred and twenty-fifth anniversary of the creation of the Federal Executive, most of the celebrants would be amazed at a realization of the changes that have taken place in the National Administration since General Washington first became President. 2 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE The Chevalier de Pontgibaud (Marquis de More), who had served through the Revolution as aide-de- camp to the Marquis de Lafayette, revisited the United States a few years after the institution of the Federal Government. He recorded: ^ — "The Government officials were as simple in their manners as ever. I had occasion to call upon Mr. McHenry, the Secretary of War. It was about eleven o'clock in the morning when I called. There was no sentinel at the door, all the rooms, the walls of which were covered with maps, were open, and in the midst of the solitude I found two clerks, each sitting at his own table, engaged in writing. At last I met a servant, or rather the servant, for there was but one in the house, and asked for the Secretary. He replied that his master was absent for the moment, having gone to the barber's to be shaved. Mr. McHenry's name figured in the State Budget for $2000 (10,500 francs), a salary quite suffi- cient in a country where the Secretary for War goes in the morning to his neighbor, the barber at the corner, to get shaved. I was as much surprised to find all the business of the War Office transacted by two clerks, as I was to hear that the Secretary had gone to the barber's." Should the Chevalier visit the War Department and the other executive departments of the Government to- day, he might find the government officials as simple in their manners as before, but he would find a very differ- ent War Office and a very different Federal Executive from that which so surprised him in the early days of the ^ A French Volunteer of the War of Independence, p. 124. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 3 Republic. The change in the Federal Executive is one of the most remarkable things in the history of the nation. Let us consider for a moment the status of one of the executive departments then and now. Nothing more strikingly illustrates the growth of the Federal Government and the development of the Cabinet and the executive departments than the history of the attorney-generalship. The first Attorney-General of the United States, Ed- mund Randolph, of Virginia, spoke of himself as "a sort of mongrel between the State and the United States; called an officer of some rank in the latter and thrust out to get a livelihood in the former." ^ Even as late as 1817, Secretary of State Monroe called attention to the fact that the Attorney-General had at the seat of the Federal Government "no apartment for business, no clerks, nor a messenger, nor stationery or fuel allowed. These have been supplied by the officer himself at his own expense." ^ Elbridge Gerry, of Massachusetts, and other jealous guardians of the rights of the States, fearful of the power of the newly created Federal Executive, provided Wash- ington with only three advisers who were heads of ex- ecutive departments, the Secretaries of State, Treasury, and War, but from the first the Attorney-General was considered a member of the advisory council composed of these three Secretaries and himself, which has come to be recognized as the President's Cabinet. Yet, 1 E. M. D. Conway, Omitted Chapters, p. 135. 2 Annals of Congress, 14th Cong., 2d Sess. (1816-17), pp. 699 and 700. 4 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE although considered a member of Washington's first Cabinet, Randolph was not the head of an executive department, and was not even required to reside at the Capital. His powers were insignificant and his compen- sation so small that he was expected to support himself from his private practice. The power and functions of the present head of the Department of Justice, if they could be known to the Anti-Federalists of Randolph's time, would cause those eminent gentlemen to turn in their graves. The fiftieth Attorney-General no longer suffers for lack of an apartment for business and a clerk, but he is the head of the great Department of Justice, the total number of whose officials and employees is about 5700,^ of which number 2070 are appointed by him. The Solicitor-General, the Solicitor of the State Department, the Solicitor of the Treasury, numerous assistant attor- neys-general, attorneys, and special attorneys in Wash- ington, numbering more than 300, 86 district attor- neys, and numerous special assistants, assistant district attorneys, and other officials, are at present under the direction of that Attorney-General, who in the days of President Monroe had neither stationery nor fuel. Kipling tells us that in the twilight of the Magic Jungle, in a sort of singsong to little Mowgli, old Baloo recited, — "As the creeper that girdles the tree-trunk, The law runneth forward and back." ^ ^ Register of the Department of Justice, 1915. * Second Jungle Booh. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 5 And so, in anti-trust prosecutions, in the crusade against the white slaver, in the enforcement of pure-food laws, in interstate commerce cases, in the suppression of fraudulent use of the mails, the power of the Attorney- General runs forward and back throughout all the States of this great Union, and the activities of the De- partment of Justice wipe out state lines and from year to year increase the power of the Federal Government and its Executive, of whose growth they are the most strik- ing illustrations. j/' The growth of the executive power has attended the growth of the nation, and its development into its pres- ent importance has been necessitated by the fusion of the federation of States into a strongly centralized American nation. To follow in detail the changes in the organization of the executive departments, and to ex- amine the methods and reasons of these changes would take us far into the life history of the Republic. In 1890, John Fiske wrote: "In signing or vetoing bills passed by Congress the President shares in legis- lation, and is virtually a third house. In his other capac- ities he is the chief executive officer of the Federal Union; and inasmuch as he appoints the other great executive officers, he is really the head of the executive depart- ment, not — like the governor of a State — a mere member of it." ^ In 1908, Woodrow Wilson compared the President, as the makers of the Constitution in- tended him to be, with what he had actually become. "His veto upon legislation was his only 'check' on * Ciml Government in the United States, p. 232. 6 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE Congress, — was a power of restraint, not of guidance. He was empowered to prevent bad laws, but he was not to be given an opportunity to make good ones. As a matter of fact, he has become very much more. He has become the leader of his party and the guide of the na- tion in political purpose, and therefore in legal action." ^ The theory expressed by Professor Wilson in 1908 has been the practice of President Wilson as Chief Execu- tive, and as a "third house" of the legislative depart- ment he has certainly not confined himself to the powers of the "third house" as described by Fiske. The Fed- eral Executive has outgrown, naturally and properly, the bounds ascribed it by the makers of the Consti- tution. The Executive, as it exists to-day, is one of the most important elements in the life of the nation. To under- stand the meaning of the national life a knowledge of the Cabinet and of the organization and work done by the Executive Departments is necessary, and while much has been written of the executive power, little has been written upon the administrative side of the Executive, as carried out by the departments. As President Wilson remarks, " It is easier to write of the President than of the Presidency." ^ The voluminous reports of the heads of the departments, the provisions of the various stat- utes of the United States relating to the departments, miscellaneous reports, congressional and department records, all set forth the business that the great govem- 1 Constitutional Government in the United States, p. 60. 2 Ibid., p. 57. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 7 mental corporation conducts. They also show in detail the methods by which this business is carried on. From them the student may learn how the State Department settles the rights of some naturalized citizen who desires to revisit his former country, but who is claimed by that country to be liable for military service, or how the Republic of Panama sprang into life and American dom- ination of the Isthmus was secured. In the same way the methods of customs collections and post-office establishments may be learned. A knowledge of these matters is essential to an understanding of daily news- paper discussions, reports of the debates and actions of Congress, and of the position of the Government. After a brief discussion of the creation and status of the execu- tive departments, it is my purpose to set forth the organization of these departments, and to indicate the matters with which they deal and their methods of work. Before doing this, however, it may be well to say a few words about the Federal Government generally. In the rush of our American life it is amazing how much we can forget, and I shall be pardoned for speaking briefly of things that we are all supposed to have once and for all time learned in the schoolroom. During the Revolutionary War, the common inter- ests of the allied colonies, almost exclusively the carry- ing-on of the war, were entrusted to the Continental Congress. This body, possessing theoretically little power, exercised, however, the greatest real power over the allied colonies. It combined in itself only the legis- lative and executive functions, for at that time there did 8 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE not exist and there was no necessity for any common judicial system for the allied sovereignties that later became States of our Union. The executive functions of the Continental Congress were exercised through its various committees and officers, but furnished httle of permanent value to the American political system. After the Revolution the government of the allied States under the Articles of Confederation for a time gave to the former colonies a more permanent and stronger common life, but that weak Government soon gave way to the present Constitution under which the nation has attained federal life and power. We learned in school that the Federal Government of the United States consists of three coordinate and theoretically independent branches, the executive, leg- islative, and judicial. We all know in a general way that the Congress makes the laws and that the Execu- tive and the courts carr^^ them out. The States' rights men in the Constitutional Convention were extremely jealous of the power of the Executive, and I shall show you in the coming chapters that they, as States' rights men, were justified in their fears, for to-day, while the express train and the telephone have eliminated state lines for all commercial purposes, the effect of recent legislation is to efface state lines for many administra- tive purposes. Before taking up the executive branch of the Federal Government, it will be well to glance at the Government as a whole. The Executive consists of the President, and, poten- tially, the Vice-President, — who, aside from the fact THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 9 that he presides over the Senate, has no place in the Government, — and the ten members of the President's Cabinet, The Cabinet, as such, is not known to the Constitution. The legal status of its members arises from Llu-'ir being heads of the executive departments, and after all they are legally only arms of the President. The power of the President and his place in the na- tional life is quite different to-day from the conception of that office held by the framers of the Constitution. They planned a Chief Magistrate, non-partisan, calm and aloof from the throbbing political questions that might agitate the legislative branch of the Government. Above the turmoil of political parties the President was dispassionately to carry out the laws in much the same non-political manner as the Chief Justice was to head the Judiciary. There were certain common interests that drew the thirteen States together: they wished to provide by the Constitution only for the needs as they saw them then — an army for external use, a diplo- matic service, also for external use, and a treasury to get money for the above external uses. The framers of the Constitution did not dream that to-day the Presi- dent would be the leader of the dominant political party in the nation ; they did not dream that he would be the one man in the nation primarily responsible to the peo- ple for the enactment into laws of their will; they did not dream that the Chief Magistrate of the new Repub- lic would exercise in time the combined powers of the English King and his Prime Minister; but then they did not dream that one arm of the President would be a 10 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE Secretary of Labor, whose duties would run into the domestic and industrial life of each of their jealously guarded States. The creation of a Department of Labor in 1913, one hundred and twenty-four years after the inauguration of the Federal Government, for the pur- pose of fostering, promoting, and developing the welfare of the wage-earners of the United States, improving their conditions, and advancing their opportunities for profitable employment regardless of state lines, is the farthest point in the development of a strongly central- ized Federal Government. At the same time it is but an indication of the enormous increase in the power of the Executive. Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists would find this increased power of the President quite to their liking, but the President of to-day is a more power- ful factor in the Federal Government than even they dared expect in 1789. Party organization and the machinery of legal primary elections were not thought of in the days when President Washington gravely and with due decorum considered the status of his Cabinet and kept the Vice-President out of it; but neither were express trains and telephones. We find the latter ex- tremely convenient and the nation no longer fears the power of the President. Besides the Executive there are to-day in the frame- work of the Federal Government two other branches. With the Judiciary this book will have little to do. As to the other branch of the Government, the Congress of the United States, it is only necessary to say that, while it theoretically makes the laws, more and more in these THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 11 days of the political leadership of the President, in much important legislation Congress merely enacts into law the principles that the majority party has de- clared in its platform. The Judiciary and the legislative branch of the Government have departed little from the theories of the Fathers. There are more courts and the Congress is larger, but the fundamental concepts of neither have greatly changed. Congress makes a greater number and more far-reaching laws, but its machinery is the same. The courts try more cases of a more far- reaching character, but their machinery is the same. The Executive has changed. In the coming years it will change more. Seats in Congress for the members of the Cabinet may come in time, and we may have places in the legislative department for arms of the Executive for which the Constitution does not specifically provide. The development of the Cabinet and the executive de- partments is the most interesting thing in the growth of the Federal Government. Let us see on what basis and out of what they were created. CHAPTER II CREATION OF THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND THE CABINET The executive business of the United States has, since the organization of the Government, been carried on by the executive departments, which have been in- creased from time to time as the requirements of the Government demanded. The Departments of State, the Treasury, and War were created by the First Congress in 1789, and the Department of the Navy was estab- lished soon after. The Post-Office and the Department of Justice had their beginnings in the same period, al- though they did not take rank as executive depart- ments till much later. The Department of Commerce and Labor, created in 1903, the Department of Labor carved from it in 1913, with the Agricultural and In- terior Departments, belong to the latter half of the history of the nation. There are to-day ten coordinate executive departments. The Constitution provides that "the executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." ^ It then proceeds to declare the length of time the President shall hold office, the method of his election and the qualifications of a President. The sec- tion contains no specific enumeration of the executive power conferred. Goodnow, in his treatise on "Com- 1 Art. n, par. 1. CREATION OF THE DEPARTMENTS 13 parative Administrative Law," ^ says that these words *' executive power" meant "that the President was to have a mihtary and poHtical power rather than an administrative power. The meaning of these words is further explained by the enumeration of the specific powers which were granted to the President by the Constitution. These are the same powers possessed by the governors of the Commonwealths. They are the power of military command, the diplomatic power, the limited veto power, the power of pardon, the power to call an extra session of Congress, to adjourn it in case of a disagreement between the houses, and the power to send a message to the Congress. The general grant of the executive power to the President means little except that the President was to be the authority in the Government that was to exercise the powers afterward enumerated as his. The only other enumerated power is an administrative power, and it is also the only purely administrative power that is mentioned clearly in the Constitution. This is the power of appointment. . . . Beyond the power of appointment he had, so far as the express provisions of the Constitution were con- cerned, no control over the administration at all." The complex system of executive departments is not provided by the Constitution. It has arisen by acts of Congress, a slow and often tentative construction, pro- vided as the national interests became more varied and far-reaching, and the needs of administration became more exacting. Our form of government is that denomi- 1 Vol. I, p. 62. 14 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE nated as rigid because of its foundation on a written instrument; but like many of our governmental institu- tions that are the product of gradual evolution, the law regulating the proceedings of the executive depart- ments, and the relations of the Cabinet to the President and Congress, is the law of the unwritten Constitution. ^ The Constitution provides that the President "may require the opinion in writing of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices." ^ The only other mention of the executive departments in the Constitution follows the provision for appointment by the President, with the consent of the Senate, of all offi- cers of the United States whose appointments are not otherwise provided for by the Constitution. By this clause of the Constitution " Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers as they think proper in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the heads of departments." ^ Upon this meager foundation have been created all ten great organiza- tions that to-day administer the domestic and foreign business of the United States. The Articles of Confederation, which preceded the Constitution, contained no provision for any executive departments, and the President of Congress under the Confederation was in no sense an executive head of the Government; yet the Continental Congress and the Congress under the Confederation had been compelled ^ Woodburn, American Republic, p. 191. 2 Art. II, sec. 2, clause 1. * Ibid., clause 2. CREATION OF THE DEPARTMENTS 15 to create some sort of executive machinery for carrying on the struggle for independence, and for conducting the business of the weak Union that was formed after the peace with England. When, on April 1, 1789, the First Congress under the Constitution was organized in Fed- eral Hall in New York, and settled down to the task of providing for the organization of the Government, it found some models for the executive department. There was a bureau of foreign affairs, and a bureau of war, each under the direction of an officer denominated a secretary. There was also a board of commissioners in charge of the Treasury, and a postmaster-general, whose duties were similar to those exercised by that officer under the colonial regime. Congress was further aided by the knowledge pos- sessed by many of its members of the discussions that had taken place in the Constitutional Convention, where, among others, a plan had been proposed (August 20, 1787) by Gouverneur Morris for a council of state, among whose members he named a Secretary of Com- merce and Finance, and another officer v/ho was to have charge of agriculture, manufactures, and kindred mat- ters, under the title of Secretary of Domestic Affairs. ^ There had also been much general discussion of the subject, and many opinions expressed. One of the most interesting of these appears in a letter, written in 1788 by Commodore John Paul Jones, in which he tells the Marquis de Lafayette that "had I the power I would create at least seven ministries in the primary organiza- ' Documentary History of the Constitution. 16 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE tion of government under the Constitution. In addition to the four already agreed upon, I would ordain a Ministry of Marine, a Ministry of Home Affairs and a General Post-Office; and as commerce must be our great reliance it would not be amiss to create also as the eighth a Ministry of Commerce." ^ Congress, however, was dominated by no such broad spirit as that expressed by the great sea captain. State jealousy of the central power operated against the creation of any more departments than were actually necessary; and after much debate in the House, where the subject was first introduced by Elias Boudinot.. a former President of the Continental Congress and a member from New Jersey, it was decided that there should be but three departments. These were to be Foreign Affairs, Treasury, and War, each with a secre- tary in charge of its work. Although the proper management of the finances was the most pressing need, and the creation of a Treasury Department had been proposed by Boudinot as the first department, the difficulties of its organization proved greater than those of any other department, and the Department of State was the first to be created. On July 27, 1789, the Senate and House of Representatives provided for its organization by passing "an act for es- tablishing an Executive Department to be denominated the Department of Foreign Affairs." ^ This fundamental 1 Original manuscript in the archives of the Congressional Li- brary. 8 1 U.S. Stat. L. 28. CREATION OF THE DEPARTMENTS 17 act provided for an executive department whose prin- cipal officer should be called the Secretary of Foreign Affairs, and who should perform and execute such duties as should from time to time be enjoined on or entrusted to him by the President relative to "correspondences, commissions, or instructions to or with public ministers or consuls from the United States, or to negotiations with public ministers from foreign States or princes, or to memorials or other applications from foreign public ministers or other foreigners, or to such other matters respecting foreign affairs as the President of the United States shall assign to the said department." The duties of this department were confined entirely to foreign relations, and closely approximated those of the Secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs under the Confederation. Its descent from the old department was indicated by the provision of the act by which the Secretary of the new department was given custody of the records, books, and papers in the office of the Secre- tary who had had charge of Foreign Affairs under the Confederation. The department did not long retain its character as dealing exclusively with foreign affairs. Administrative functions of a very diverse and hetero- geneous nature were added almost immediately upon the original founding of the department, for within two months was passed an act ^ providing for the safe- keeping by the secretary of this department of the acts, records, and seal of the United States and also for the publication and authentication under his authority of 1 September 15, 1789. 1 U.S. Stat. L. 68. 18 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE the laws passed by Congress. Thus, to the duties of the Foreign Secretary were added duties analogous to those of Keeper of the Great Seal of England. To indicate this new province, it was provided that the department should thereafter be denominated the Department of State, and that its principal officer should thereafter be called the Secretary of State. The department, though shorn of some of its miscellaneous functions, remains to- day substantially the same as when it was created, but its organization has kept pace with the growth that has followed the marvelous expansion of the national inter- ests. The establishing act provided for the secretary, one inferior officer to be called the chief clerk, and assistant clerks. To-day there are three assistant secre- taries, and numerous clerks and assistants of various sorts. The Secretary of the Treasury takes rank immediately after the Secretary of State, but the Department of War was the second department in order of creation. On the 7th of August, 1789, was passed the "act to establish an Executive Department to be denominated the Depart- ment of War." ^ The secretary of this department was to perform and execute such duties as should be en- trusted to him by the President "relative to military commissions, or to the land or naval forces, ships or warlike stores of the United States, or to such other matters respecting military or naval affairs as the Presi- dent of the United States shall assign to the said de- partment, or relative to the granting of lands to persons , 1 1 U.S. Stat. L. 49. CREATION OF THE DEPARTMENTS 19 entitled thereto, for military services rendered to the United States, or relative to Indian affairs." As in the case of the State Department the new De- partment of War was named as the depository of all books and records in the office of the Secretary for the Department of War, established under the Confedera- tion of the "United States in Congress assembled." The organization of the department followed that of the Department of Foreign Affairs, and it was placed under the charge of a Secretary of War. The creation of the Departments of State and of War was accomplished with comparative ease, but it was not until September 2, 1789, six weeks after the creation of the first department, that the act was passed for the establishment of the Treasury Department. The "An- nals" of Congress ^ show the diversity of opinion that existed as to the organization of the department and the opposition from certain quarters to the substitution of a single secretary for the board that had directed the Continental finances.^ The war with England had left a great burden of debt upon the young nation, and its management presented momentous problems. The Constitution provided for the collection of revenue from various sources, but was silent as to the measures to be employed. No aid of any great value was to be derived from the methods employed under the Confederation, for the lack of power to raise money had been the fatal » May 19-21, and July 23, 1789. 2 James Schouler, A History of the United States under the Con- stitiUion, vol. i, p. 93. 20 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE defect of that weak attempt at government. Further- more, the organization of the Treasury Department pre- sented internal difficulties that were totally absent in the other departments, and it is a remarkable commen- tary upon the ability of the framers of the act which established, the Treasury Department that it continues to-day under the original plan, and that in all the history of its vast dealings there has occurred no important der- eliction of duty by those in charge of the nation's funds. Its organization is, in comparison with the other de- partments, very complicated. It is sufficient here to note that in addition to the Secretary of the Treasury, there were named as officers a Comptroller, an Auditor, a Treasurer, a Register and an assistant to the Secretary. It was stated in the act that the Secretary of the Treas- ury was "to be deemed head of the Department." The fact that the duties of the other officers were so impor- tant shows the fear of Congress of putting too much power into the hands of the Secretary, and this caution is accentuated by the fact that of all the officers above enumerated only the assistant secretary was to be ap- pointed by the Secretary of the Treasury. Washington was inaugurated April 30, 1789, and at once proceeded to carry on the Government with the aid of^the executive machinery that had served the United States under the Confederation. John Jay had been Secretary of Foreign Affairs under the Confedera- tion, and upon the establishment of that department under the Constitution, he was offered the new position. He preferred rather to become the Chief Justice, but re- CREATION OF THE DEPARTMENTS 21 tained his old position at the President's request until March 21, 1790, when Jefferson returned from France to assume his duties as the first Secretary of State. On September 11, 1789, Alexander Hamilton was nominated by the President, confirmed by the Senate, and commis- sioned Secretary of the Treasury, and in this manner, just seven days after the establishment of the Treasury Department, became the first member of the first Cab- inet under the Constitution. On the same day, Henry Knox, of Massachusetts, was nominated, and on the fol- lowing day confirmed, as Secretary of War. On the 25th of September followed Jefferson's nomination as Secre- tary of State, and with his confirmation the new Cabinet was completed, although Jay continued to administer the affairs of State for six months longer. The heads of these three departments stood upon an equal footing as heads of executive departments and advisers to the President, but there were two other officers of the Government, the Attorney-General and the Postmaster-General, whose position was not for some time so clearly defined. The Act of September 24, 1789, ^ which established the judicial courts of the United States, provided for the ap- pointment of "a meet person, learned in the law, to act as Attorney-General for the United States." This officer, in addition to his duties to prosecute and conduct all suits in the Supreme Court in which the United States should be concerned, was directed to give his advice and opinion upon questions of law "when required by the 1 1 U.S. Stat. L. 73. 22 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE President of the United States, or when requested by the heads of any of the departments touching any matter that may concern their departments." Commenting on this provision, Dr. Learned * says: "The portion of the act devoted to the Attorney- General's place is curiously brief. This brevity suggests the marked immaturity of the administrative judicial system of the Central Government. Indeed, so far as the Central Government is concerned, the office was an innovation, for no such office had been known to the Confederation. On the other hand, the English attor- ney-generalship, which doubtless furnished the men of 1789 with a model was old and well estabUshed. More- over, there had been Attorneys-General in many of the colonies." Although those who drafted the Judiciary Act may have had in mind the Attorney-General of England or similar officers of the Colonial Governments, the Attorney- General of the United States from the first occupied a position quite unlike that held by any of these officers, and Dr. Learned is undoubtedly correct in his statement, that "the office was an innovation." President Lowell, of Harvard, in "The Government of England," ^ says: "The principal law officers of the Crown are the Attorney-General and the Solicitor- General. Their opinion on questions of law may be asked by the Government and by any department, al- though many of the departments are provided with per- manent legal counsel of their own whose advice is suffi- cient for all ordinary matters." He also says: "These 1 The President's Cabinet, p. 106. " Vol. i, pp. 132, 133. CREATION OF THE DEPARTMENTS 23 gentlemen hold no judicial position; and curiously- enough, while a part of the Ministry, are never in the Cabinet." Mr. Monroe, while Secretary of State in 1817, wrote: "The Attorney- General has been always, since the adoption of our Government, a member of the Executive Council, or Cabinet. His duties in attending the Cabinet are equal to those of any other members." ^ The statute which created the office merely indicated in the most meager terms the duties of the Attorney- General, and it was not till 1870 that the Department of Justice was created. The office has gradually developed and its duties become defined as the Federal Govern- ment has itself grown; but by virtue of his advisory capacity, the Attorney-General has been considered a member of the Cabinet since the appointment of Ed- mund Randolph, the first incumbent of the office. The first Cabinet was therefore made up of the Secretaries of the three departments, and the Attorney- General, who was himself not the head of a department, and therefore not one of the constitutional advisers of the President referred to in the clause providing for the furnishing of opinions to the President. He was a mem- ber of the Cabinet by reason of the advisory position provided by the Act of Congress that created his office. The fifth of the executive officers of the Government occupied a position exactly opposite to that of the At- torney-General. The Postmaster-General was for many years head of a department that performed a most im- portant function of government administration, but it 1 14th Cong., 2d Sess. (1816-17), Annals, p. 699. 24 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE was not till 1829 that the head of the Department of the Post-Ofiice was accorded a Cabinet position. The Post-Ofiice Department has the longest record of any of the executive departments of the Government. In July, 1775, nearly a year before the Declaration of Independence, a general post-office was created and Franklin chosen Postmaster-General. The Articles of Confederation provided for the continuance of this de- partment, and on September 22, 1789, the First Congress passed an "Act for the temporary establishment of the Post-Office." 1 This act provided for the appointment of a Post- master-General whose powers should be the same "as they last were under the resolutions and ordinances of the late Congress." This act was to continue in force for one year, and was continued in 1790, and again in 1791. In 1792 a more comprehensive act was passed, and in 1794 the present department was created. The work of the department was of a purely routine character, and in the beginning the Postmaster-General was considered unimportant as compared with the heads of the State, Treasury, and War Departments. In 1829, however, with nearly eight thousand deputy postmasters under his control, and consequently with more patronage than that of the head of any other department, the Post- master-General could no longer be treated as of sub- ordinate rank, and President Jackson invited Post- master-General Barry to enter the Cabinet as one of his advisers. 1 1 U.S. Stat. L. 70. CREATION OF THE DEPARTMENTS 25 When the First Congress closed its work, it had pro- vided for the immediate executive needs of the govern- ment administration, and the changes that thereafter occurred in the existing departments, and the creation of new departments came gradually as the natural re- sults of experience and of enlarged and more varied administrative demands. The first evidence of the enlarged executive require- ments of the nation was the division of the province of the War Department. During the early years of the Republic there had been constant difficulties with Eng- lish aggression on the seas, and in 1798 the relations with France had come to such a state that war with that country seemed unavoidable. The natural outcome of these conditions was increased naval activity, and on April 30, 1798, a new division of the executive adminis- tration was created under the name of the " Department of the Navy." ^ The organization of this department followed the prevailing type as exemplified by the De- partment of State, and at its head was placed a Secre- tary of the Navy. His duties, as set forth in the funda- mental act, were to "execute such orders as he shall receive from the President of the United States, relative to the procurement of naval stores and materials and the construction, armament, equipment, and employment of vessels of war, as well as other matters connected with the naval establishment of the United States." The act concluded with the natural corollary to the creation of the department that the new Secretary was to take 1 1 U.S. Stat. L. 553. 26 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE possession of the books and records appertaining to his department, which were then deposited in the office of the "Secretary at War." The first member of the Cabinet to take his place as representative of the new department was Benjamin Stoddert, of Maryland, who was appointed by President Adams, upon the refusal to serve of George Cabot, of Massachusetts, to whom the secretaryship was first offered. It is recorded of Secretary Stoddert that he was "a Georgetown merchant, without political antecedents, who proved himself an efficient officer and the most constant member of President Adams's Cabinet." 1 Schouler, vol. i, p. 404. CHAPTER III DEVELOPMENT OF THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND THE CABINET The creation of the Navy Department was made necessary by the development in importance of an existing part of the administrative work of the Execu- tive, but the estabhshment of the next department was necessitated by the assumption of new burdens by the Government, and by an enlargement of the sphere of the national activity. The creation of the Department of the Interior and of the three departments that have since been added shows in a marked degree the increased power of the Executive of the nation. The acquisition of vast territories wrested from Mexico, in addition to those acquired by peaceful means, imposed greater responsibilities upon the President, while the devel- opment of the country increased greatly the various miscellaneous duties that had in the early days been performed by the existing departments as unimportant incidents. As indicated by the plans for the departments sub- mitted to the Constitutional Convention, the idea of a general home department was discussed at the very foundation of the Government, but postponed as un- necessary under the conditions that then existed. The demand for such a division of the executive administra- jtion became imperative in the days when the Wilmot 28 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE v Proviso was concentrating all attention on internal affairs, and at a time when no foreign complications di- verted discussion from the great questions that underlay the Missouri Compromise. In February, 1849, Representative Vinton, a member of the Ways and Means Committee, reported a bill in the House that had been drafted by Robert J. Walker, President Polk's powerful Secretary of the Treasury. The bill was passed in the House by a strong non-parti- san vote, and in the last days of the session the Senate concurred in the measure.^ On March 3, 1849, this bill became a law under a title which is indicative of its character as a general measure of department reforma- tion. It is called "An act to establish the Home De- partment, and to provide for the Treasury Department an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, and a Commis- sioner of the Customs." It differs materially in some of its provisions from the acts by which the existing de- partments had been created and for that reason merits a more careful examination. The creative portion of the act provided "that from and after the passage of this act there shall be created a new executive department of the Government of the United States, to be called the Department of the Interior; the head of which de- partment shall be appointed by the President of the United States by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, who shall hold his office by the same tenure, and receive the same salary, as the Secretaries of the other executive departments, and who shall perform the duties 1 Schouler, vol. v, p. 121. DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEPARTMENTS 29 assigned him by this act." The significant portions of this part of the act are those that provide that the Senate shall concur in the appointment and the definite assignment of duties by Congress to the new Secretary. In the previous acts establishing or modifying depart- ments, it had been stated merely that the head of the department was to be appointed by the President and that he should perform those duties relative to certain named matters assigned him by the President. It was intimated in the Constitution that the heads of the departments should be appointed by and with the consent of the Senate/ and this had been the practice from the time of the appointment of the first Secretary; but by this act, for the first time, this practice was noted in the establishment of a department. The act in its further provisions showed the clearer understanding that had been gained of the position of the departments. Among the heterogeneous duties assigned to the new Secretary were the supervision of the office of the Com- missioner of Patents, formerly exercised by the Secre- tary of State, and' the supervision of the General Land Office and of the accounts of the marshals, clerks, and other officers of the United States Courts, formerly the province of the Secretary of the Treasury. The War Department lost control over Indian affairs, and the Navy Department was required to cede its supervision of pensions to the new Secretary. In addition to these duties the control of the census affairs was transferred from the State Department, while such miscellaneous ^ Art. II, sec. 2, clause 2. 30 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE matters were added as the supervision of the mines owned by the United States and the power before exer- cised by the President over the commissioners of pubhc buildings, and over the penitentiary of the District of Columbia. The first Secretary of the new department, Thomas Ewing, of Ohio, was assuredly in charge of an amount of administrative work as miscellaneous as it was important and far-reaching in its scope. Judged by the nature of the duties originally assigned to them, as well as the time of their creation, the de- partments may be said to be capable of division into two classes. The original departments, with which the Department of the Navy must be classed, were all formed during the infancy of the Republic, and their development has been but an amplification under wider and better laws of the work of the Federal Government. The Departments of the Interior and of Agriculture, and the still new Departments of Commerce and of Labor, belong to the powerful Government of a strongly cen- tralized nation, and in their work are exponents of the last half of the national life, rather than of the days of early struggle and development, when state sovereignty was the prevailing conception and the Union savored more of a strong federation of States than of such a Union as emerged from the great constitutional struggle that caused the Civil War. The early departments min- istered to the bare necessities of the Government. The later departments foster the more general welfare of the nation. The Department of Agriculture was created by Act DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEPARTMENTS 31 of May 15, 1862, for a purpose that in 1789 would have been deemed entirely outside the province of the func- tions of the National Government, — to diffuse among the people of the United States useful information on subjects connected with agriculture in its most general and comprehensive meaning. Although designated a department, it was not classed with the high executive departments of the Government. It was rather an independent bureau, and at its head was placed not a Secretary, but merely a Commissioner. It was not till February 9, 1889, that this department was placed upon an equal footing with what may be termed the Cabinet Departments. By the act of that date,^ Congress made it one of the executive departments and placed it in charge of a Secretary of Agriculture. Its duties were enlarged, and its first head, Norman J. Colman, of Missouri, became a member of President Cleveland's Cabinet on February 13, 1889. In this manner the industries of the country, a subject seem- ingly non-executive, were for the first time accorded a representative in the Council of the Chief Executive, and a new theory was definitely added to that unwritten part of the Constitution that has been slowly developing since the formation of the Union. The history of the erection of the Department of Commerce and Labor shows the same development. The national importance of the labor interests of the country received recognition in the establishment of the Bureau of Labor under the act of Congress approved 1 25 U.S. Stat. L. 659. 32 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE June 27, 1884, which occupied a position very similar to that of the Department of Agriculture at the time of its first establishment. As far as the Government was con- cerned, the commercial and manufacturing interests of the country were, at that time, left to the casual atten- tion of various offices of the several departments. With the great increase of the industries of the nation the need of more definite government supervision of indus- trial matters grew to be generally recognized. Many petitions on the subject were made to Congress, various commercial conventions presented memorials on the same theme, and the subject has been referred to in the more recent political platforms and messages of the Presidents. The arguments offered for a Department of Commerce were based on the fact noted by John Paul Jones in 1788, that the United States was a distinctly commercial and industrial nation. The creation of the Department of Agriculture was cited as a precedent, and the fact was set forth that the Census Report for the year ending June 1, 1900, showed that the aggre- gate value of the products of the manufacturing plants of the United States for that year was about four times the aggregate value of all the products of agriculture for the same period. It was argued on these premises that there existed all and as strong reasons for the super- vision of commerce by the Government, as those that. had led to the establishment of the Department of Agriculture, and, as a result of the representations be- fore congressional committees and the general public demand, a bill was originated in the Senate, passed in DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEPARTMENTS 33 the House, and on February 14, 1903, approved by the President, which recognized and provided for the needs of labor and of commerce. Under the provisions of this act ^ a new department was added to the executive ad- ministration. On February 16, 1903, the appointment of George B. Cortelyou, of New York, was confirmed by the Senate, and two days later the Secretary of Com- merce and Labor, the ninth member of the Cabinet, qualified as head of the ninth of the executive depart- ments of the Government. 2 The tenth and last of the executive departments was created by act approved March 4, 1913. By this act the new member of the Cabinet was charged with the duty of fostering the welfare of the wage-earners of the United States, im- proving their working conditions and advancing their opportunities for profitable employment; he is enabled to perform the duties of mediator and to appoint com- missioners of conciliation in labor disputes whenever in his judgment the interests of industrial peace may re- quire it to be done. From the old Department of Com- merce and Labor, the Bureau of Immigration and other matters were taken and given to the new department. On March 5, 1913, William Bauchop Wilson, of Penn- sylvania, became the first Secretary of Labor. The tendency of the original creation of the admin- istrative machinery was to limit the work of the exec- utive departments as well as their number to the bare 1 32 U.S. Stat. L. 825. 2 Department of Commerce and Labor, Organization and Law (1904). 34 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE necessities of the Government. The Department of Foreign Affairs was made to do double duty under the name of the Department of State, but the old conception of the Union has changed, and with this change, the old restrictive idea has ceased to guide the policies of the nation. Expansion is the underlying theory of present internal administration, as well as of foreign affairs, and it is probable that within a few years the ever-widening sphere of executive administration will demand further enlargement of the means of doing the increased busi- ness of the Government. It is to be expected that the history of the Departments of Agriculture, of Commerce, and of Labor, foreshadowed in a measure by that of the Post-Office Department, will be repeated, and that in the near future divisions which now exist as independ- ent bureaus or commissions will follow the course of these departments and in their turn become parts of the executive administration, equal in rank to those that were established by the first Congress that assembled under the Constitution. It is not improbable that we shall some day have a Department of Education de- veloped from the Bureau of Education, now in the Department of the Interior, and a Department of Trans- portation, already foreshadowed, perhaps, by the Inter- state Commerce Commission. I have thus briefly sketched the creation and develop- ment of the executive departments and the Cabinet. It is unnecessary to go more fully into the history of each of the departments, but it will be of value for us to ex- amine more carefully the development of the Depart- DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEPARTMENTS 35 ment of Justice, which is the most striking example of the development of a great executive department from extremely small beginnings, and from what I have to say about the Department of Justice one may readily understand the similar processes of development which have taken place in the other departments. It is probable that the character of the early Attor- neys-General and their close relation to the Presidents under whom they served had much to do with the defin- ing of the duties of the office. Randolph had been the first Attorney-General of the State of Virginia under its new Constitution of 1776. For years he had been on terms of intimate friendship with Washington, and be- cause of his qualifications and his personal relation it was natural that Washington should consider him a member of his Executive Council or Cabinet. Randolph served as Attorney-General until January 2, 1794, when he became Secretary of State. In the early days of the Administration it was definitely settled that the President must look to his Attorney-General for legal advice. In 1793 the President asked the advice of the federal judges concerning certain questions arising under the treaties with France. " It was, perhaps, for- tunate for the judges and their successors," writes the late Professor James Bradley Thayer, "that the ques- tions then proposed came in so formidable a shape as they did. There were twenty-nine of them, and they fill three large octavo pages. Had they been brief and easily answered, the court might not improbably have slipped into the adoption of a precedent that would have en- 36 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE grafted the English usage upon our natic^ial system." The judges refused to furnish the advice asked by the President. Commenting on this, Professor Thayer adds, "As it is, . . . while the President may require the writ- ten opinion of his Cabinet, he does not possess a like au- thority in regard to the judicial department." ^ So, at the outset, it was settled that the Attorney-General was the sole legal adviser of the President. It was soon de- cided that, although he was the chief law officer of the Government, he was not the legal adviser of Congress. Few men did more to define the duties of the Attor- ney-General than William Wirt, of Maryland and Vir- ginia, who accepted the office in October, 1817. In January, 1820, he declined to give to the House a legal opinion demanded of him, and from that time it has been settled that Congress cannot demand legal opinions from the Attorney-General. In refusing to act as legal adviser to Congress, Wirt said: "It is true that in this case, I should have the sanction of the House . . . and it is not less true that my respect for the House impels me strongly to obey the order. The precedent, however, would not be less dangerous on account of the purity of the motives in which it originated. I may be wrong in my view of the subject; the order may be sanctioned by former precedents; but my predecessors in office have left nothing for my guidance." ^ Wirt also further limited the duties of his office when on April 3, 1820, he wrote to the Secretary of the Navy, 1 Legal Essays, pp. 53, 54, note. (1908.) 2 16th Cong., 1st Sess., vol. 5, House Documents, no. 68, p. 2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEPARTMENTS 37 "As my official duty is confined to the giving my opinion on questions of law, I consider myself as having nothing to do with the settlement of controverted questions of fact." The reorganization of the office of the Attorney- General was from time to time subject to careful con- sideration. President Jackson, in a message to Congress, called attention to the need of reorganizing the Attor- ney-General's office. He believed that the salary of this officer should be increased, that he should be given proper quarters for his work and proper assistance, and should be charged with the general superintendence of the Government's legal matters. ^ It was also proposed that the Attorney-General should remain permanently in Washington, and not engage in private practice. A bill based upon these suggestions failed to pass Congress, but in 1830 the office of Solicitor of the Treasury was created, and the salary of the Attorney-General was raised to $4000, at which amount it remained until 1853. President Polk agreed with Jackson in his desire to in- crease the duties and responsibilities of the Attorney- General, but it was not until Gushing became Attorney- General that the office began to assume the form of a regular government department. He made certain per- tinent suggestions for the reorganization of the depart- ment, ^ and it has been said of him that he "raised the office of Attorney-General and organized it to be ^ A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, by James D. Richardson, vol. ll, pp. 314-15. 2 Opinions of the Attorney-General, vol. vi, pp. 326-55. 38 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE in truth and in fact a department of Government."* Gushing devoted considerable thought to the relation of the President to the executive departments. ^ The Givil War had greatly added to the business of the Department of Justice. In 1861 the department had grown to such an extent that there were besides the Attorney-General an Assistant Attorney-General, a Solicitor of the Court of Claims, and the Solicitor of the Treasury. From 1861 the district attorneys were under the direction of the Attorney-General. ^ The great vol- ume of law business arising from the Civil War was necessarily performed by special counsel, who were em- ployed at a great expense. It is said that between the years 1860 and 1870 the Government was obliged to pay about $100,000 a year for extra counsel. To this fact, as much as to any other, is probably due the reorganization of the office of the Attorney-General and its erection into the Department of Justice during the Administration of President Grant in 1870. The purpose of this act was to create for the Federal Government a comprehensive and capable law department. And from that time to the present Administration, the various law matters of the Government have become more and more closely super- vised by the Attorney-General. The power of the de- partment has greatly increased in the last few years. The addition and growth of the Bureau of Investiga- tion, the special agents of which, throughout the United 1 Memorial of Caleb Cushiyig (Newburyport, 1879), p. 169. 2 Opinions of the Attorney-General, vol. vil, pp. 453-82. » Easby Smith, The Department of Justice, pp. 16, 28-30. DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEPARTMENTS 39 States, gather information as to violations of the law, the assumption of control over the attorneys of the Inter- state Commerce Commission, and the closer subordina- tion of the district attorneys which took place under the administration of Attorney-General Wickersham, have attended the additional power conferred by the pure- food laws, white-slave laws, etc., and the broadened scope of such laws as section 215, Penal Code, which in 1909 was expanded to include, as a violation of the privileges of the United States mail, the mailing of any letter in pursuance of a scheme to defraud. Previous to 1909 only schemes which contemplated the use of the mails in their inception came under the federal law. Under the present law the department has charge of all manner of frauds, for few schemes to defraud exist in which the mails are not used to some extent, and any use of the mails to further the fraud is sufficient to give rise to federal prosecution. This change in the law is one of the most noticeable additions to the power of the Federal Government for the protection of the people. Under it the vendors of "fake" or unfairly inflated mining and other corporation stocks, are in danger of federal penitentiaries, and it covers a great multitude of cases. A most striking example of its broad scope is found in a case I once prosecuted as United States Attorney. The defendant, who pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a term in the Atlanta Penitentiary, al- though already married, posed as a bachelor, won the heart of a lady of some wealth in a rural community, and then, under the plea of providing himself a career 40 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE for the happiness of his betrothed, defrauded her of many thousand dollars. He told the lady he was using the money to pay his expenses in a prominent medical school, whereas, "in truth and in fact," as the indictment read, he used the poor lady's funds for the support of his wife and family, and for the entertainment of sundry other ladies to whom his wife would most certainly have objected had she known of his relations with them. The laws for the protection of the mails have thus given the Federal Government jurisdiction over matters which many of the framers of the Constitution would have considered as especially without the purview of the Federal Government. CHAPTER IV STATUS OF THE HEADS OF THE EXECUTIVE DEPART- MENTS COLLECTIVELY, AS AN ADVISORY COUNCIL OR CABINET Before considering the organization and work of the departments whose gradual development has been traced, it will be instructive to consider the status of the heads of the departments, collectively as a Cabinet, and individually as parts of the executive machinery. It is essential to a comprehension of the work of the depart- ments to understand the essential laws that define or indicate the relations that exist between the President, the Congress, and the nation at large. In the same gradual and tentative manner in which the executive administration has been created, the position of the Cabinet has been defined, and the rules that govern the various departments have been evolved. Lord Bryce, the great authority on American Gov- ernment, assures us that there is in the Government of the United States no such thing as a Cabinet in the English sense of the term,^ nor is there in the United States a body that takes the position of the boards of responsible ministers that in Continental Governments bear the name of a Cabinet. The English Cabinet is practically a committee of the sovereign, the Parlia- ment. From this supreme body it derives its existence, ^ The American Commonwealth, vol. i, p. 86. 42 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE and its power and duration depend solely upon the sup- port that its creator gives it. The Ministry of the French Government occupies a somewhat similar position. Be- cause of its relation to the legislative body the "English Cabinet is properly called, and in fact is, the "Govern- ment." The management of the affairs of the allied colonies, and of the later association of States under the Articles of Confederation, presented a mode of government in many ways like that of England to-day, and in the de- bates upon the various plans considered by the Con- stitutional Convention, there appeared many advocates for the adoption of such a system for the new American nation. The Constitution, however, provides for noth- ing in the nature of a Cabinet nor is such a body recog- nized by the laws; yet for want of a better term the col- lective heads of the various executive departments have from the days of Washington been popularly styled "the Cabinet." It has been said that the English Cabinet is the exec- utive agent of the Commons. The Constitution of the United States vests the executive function exclusively in the President; and as in England the Cabinet is the executive agent of the supreme power that combines all functions, so in America, the heads of the departments are the agents of the supreme executive power, the President. The English Cabinet formulates the policies of the Government, but while the American Cabinet participates in the formation of executive policies, it does so merely as an advisory body, whose advice need HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AS CABINET 43 not be heeded by the President. Its sole legal power lies in the individual position of its members as constitu- tional officers of the United States and executive agents of the President. The records of its meetings have no more force than those of any voluntary association, and although it plays a part in the national affairs that is ever assuming more importance, it has at law no recog- nized status of any sort. The position of the members of the Cabinet as exec- utive advisers arises from their special knowledge of their own departments, and from their general knowl- edge as experienced men of affairs. Although the Con- stitution provides that the President may require the opinions of the heads of the executive departments, it was not expected that he should do more than ask their opinions as individuals. Woodburn^ states that it was not contemplated "that he should assemble them to- gether for consultation and advice on the general policy of the administration." He then says, "He might follow this advice or not as he chose: he could proceed with the most important political matters without asking it, as John Adams did in our French relations in 1800, and Jefferson in the Louisiana Treaty in 1803, and in the Monroe-Pinkney Treaty of 1806." The advisory position of the Cabinet has varied un- der different Administrations. Washington usually con- sulted his Cabinet members individually. During the Administration of Adams the Cabinet took a more definite position, and its members asserted advisory 1 The American Republic and its Government, p. 190. 44 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE rights. Jefferson's use of his Cabinet is interesting. "Where a question occurred of sufficient magnitude to require the opinions of all the heads of departments, he called them together, had the subject discussed, and a vote taken, in which he counted himself as but one. But he always seems to have considered that he had the power to decide against the opinion of his Cabinet. . . . When there were differences of opinion, he aimed to pro- duce a unanimous result by discussion, and almost al- ways succeeded. But he admits that this practice made the Executive, in fact, a directory." ^ Buchanan had great difficulty in the management of his Cabinet be- cause of his weakness of character, but Lincoln always dominated his Secretaries. The Emancipation Procla- mation was prepared without their advice, and merely submitted to them for suggestion. ^ Andrew Johnson's difficulties with Congress led to serious encroachments by that body upon the rights of the Executive, and the Tenure-of-Office Acts were intended to deprive him of control over his own executive agents. President Wilson has very clearly stated the advisory position of the Cabinet. "Self-reliant men," he writes, "will regard their Cabinets as Executive Councils; men less self- reliant or more prudent will regard them as also political councils, and will wish to call into them men who have earned the confidence of their party. The character of the Cabinet may be made a nice index of the theory 1 Woodburn, p. 191. 2 Stevens, The Sources of the Constitution of the United States in Relation to Colonial and English History, p. 168. HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AS CABINET 45 of the presidential office, as well as of the President's theory of party government, but the one view is, so far as I can see, as constitutional as the other." ^ In recent years, especially since the Spanish-American War, the tendency has been to accord more rights to the Cabinet by the Chief Executive, while attempted con- gressional interferences, such as the Tenure-of-Office Acts, have been withdrawn. The growing power of the President has led to much discussion of the executive prerogatives and of the relations of the Cabinet to Con- gress. The advisability of giving seats in Congress to the cabinet officers has received some attention and various propositions have been advanced on the sub- ject. Those who favor such a procedure contend that should the members of the Cabinet be given seats in Congress, with power to introduce and debate upon measures but with no power to vote, such a change would make the passage of proper departmental legisla- tion more easy. The President, since the Federal Ad- ministration began, has expressed his wishes directly to Congress by messages; indirectly, in person, or through his executive officers to the individual members of the Senate or the House. In the records of the First Congress are instances in which the President himself and even members of his Cabinet appeared in Congress to advo- cate measures. On the 22d of August, 1789, President Washington and the Secretary of War came to the Senate, bringing a treaty with the Southern Indians, which the Senators were apparently expected to consent to simply 1 Constitutional Government in the United States, p. 77. 46 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE on hearing it read. When the whole matter was post- poned and referred to a committee, the President, records Senator Maclay,^ "wore an aspect of stern dis- pleasure," and withdrew at length "with a discontented air," and, adds Maclay naively, "had it been any other man than the man whom I wish to regard as the first character in the world, I would have said, with sullen dignity." When the President appeared again in the Senate on Monday, the 24th, he had recovered his equanimity, and was "placid and serene," consenting to amendment of articles of the treaty. ^ It was the custom of Washington and it has been the practice of President Wilson to appear before Congress and deliver his messages on important subjects in person. Should the President so desire, there would seem to be no constitutional reason why he should not enter into debates in Congress upon pending legislation, al- though there exist many extra-legal reasons against such practice. If the President in person could introduce bills and participate in debates in Congress, there would seem to be no constitutional reason why he should not so act through his executive agents, the members of the Cabinet. On the other hand, through the consequent right of members of Congress to question cabinet officers officially appearing in Congress as to administration policies, the President might find himself seriously ham- pered in both his legislative and executive programme. 1 Journal of William Maclay, p. 135. 2 Rowland, Life and Correspondence of Charles Carroll of Carroll- ton, vol. II, p. 137. HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AS CABINET 47 This question of giving to members of the Cabinet some individual and definite relation to Congress has been considered from time to time by political theorists and in the public press. At present, however, it would seem that the President is able without difficulty to exert upon Congress the necessary influence for the passage of party measures by the means at present existing, and it seems doubtful whether any change in this respect is likely to occur. I am inclined to the opinion that the presence of the Cabinet in Congress would seriously in- terfere with the power of the Executive. President Wilson has followed the practice in cabinet meetings of having each department represented. In the absence of the Secretary, an assistant secretary or other designated official has appeared to represent the department, but this is in no way a radical departure from the previous practice. The Vice-President has never been considered a member of the Cabinet. From certain points of view, it would be a most excellent modification of the present practice if the Vice-President should be admitted to the regular meetings wherein are discussed the executive policies of the Government, and such a procedure has from time to time been considered. In the main, however, the status of the Cabinet as a council has undergone little change since the days of President Johnson, and although its powers and rela- tions present afield for much interesting speculation, as long as our Government retains its present form the Cabinet will probably remain in its position as an unofficial advisory body, whose influence on general 48 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE executive policies will depend upon the character of its members and the personal force of the President. As to the relation of the Vice-President to the Cabinet, the Constitution provides that the Vice-President shall be President of the Senate, and that he shall have no vote unless the Senate be equally divided.^ Article I deals with the legislative powers, while Article II deals with the executive powers. The executive power is vested in the President alone, and the exclusion of the Vice- President from the Cabinet seems to be due to the theory that during the life of the President the Vice-President's executive potentialities are dormant and that he has no duties except as President of the Senate, of which he is a constitutional part. In the beginning there was considerable discussion as to the status of the Vice-President and his relation to the Government. We are again indebted to Senator Maclay for light on this subject. Senator Maclay was a Democrat and began to differ with the Federalists very early in the first session of the Senate. He boldly objected to the presence of the President in the Senate while business was being transacted and opposed any augmentation of the power of the Executive. According to him, John Adams in the session of April 25, 1789, said to the Senate, " Gentlemen, I do not know whether the framers of the Constitution had in view the two Kings of Sparta or the two Consuls of Rome when they framed it; one to have all the power while he held it, and the other to be nothing. Nor do I know whether the ^ Art. I, sec. 3, clause 4. HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AS CABINET 49 architect that formed our room and the wide chair in it (to hold two, I suppose) had the Constitution before him. Gentlemen, I feel great difficulty how to act. I am possessed of two separate powers, the one in esse and the other in posse. I am Vice-President. In this I am nothing, but I may be everything. But I am Presi- dent also of the Senate. When the President comes into the Senate, what shall I be? I cannot be [President] then. No, gentlemen, I cannot, I cannot." ^ Senator Elsworth, continues Maclay, thumbed over the sheet Constitution and turned it for some time. At length he rose and addressed the Chair with the utmost gravity. "Mr. President, I have looked over the Con- stitution [pause], and I find, sir, it is evident and clear, sir, that wherever the Senate are to be, there, sir, you must be at the head of them." The Senate itself an- swered the Vice-President's query, and ever since the Vice-President has remained President of the Senate alone, and has had no part in the cabinet councils or the work of the Executive. Adams, however, fought hard to establish the posi- tion of the Vice-President as an executive officer, and Maclay narrates many interesting and often amusing happenings in the Senate before the executive notion was driven from the mind of the presiding officer. He signed the proceedings of the Senate at first as "Vice- President," and this procedure was the subject of much debate in and out of the Senate. The distinguished Rob- ert Morris, then Senator from Pennsylvania, thought ^ Journal of William Maclay, p. 3. 50 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE this style of signature correct; Senator Carroll, of Maryland (the *' Signer")* said he thought it was "a matter of indifference," but Maclay rose in the Senate and said, " The very term Vice-President carried on the face of it the idea of holding the place of the President in his absence; that every act done by the Vice-President as such implied that when so acting he held the place of the President." Seeing the Vice-President "willing to bear me down," Maclay continued, "Sir, we know you not as Vice-President within this House. As President of the Senate only do we know you." ^ Another discussion of the matter came up when the oath of office was administered to Adams by Senator John Langdon, of New Hampshire. The minutes of the Senate read: "Mr. Langdon administered the oath to the Vice-President," and this started anew the con- troversy as to the position of that official. All this dis- cussion was concurrent with that as to the titles of the various officials, and it is strange to us now to find Senators Grayson, of Virginia, and Carroll, of Mary- land, opposing all forms of titles, while the New Eng- land Senators favored them. For a time it seemed as if the President might be styled, "His Highness the President of the United States and Protector of the Rights of the Same," or " Elective Majesty." In those days when the terms of the Constitution were being defined and the experiment of democracy was for the first time being tried, the debates of Congress are most interesting and instructive. Maclay never intended ^ Maclay, Journal, p. 40. HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AS CABINET 51 his "Journal" to be published. It is, therefore, one of the most interesting documents of the time, and well worth reading. I cannot resist the temptation to con- clude this chapter by a quotation from Maclay as to his views of the value of "The Federahst" and even of the Constitution itself. He writes, on June 14, 1789: "My mind revolts, in many instances, against the Constitu- tion of the United States. Indeed, I am afraid it will turn out the vilest of all traps that ever was set to en- snare the freedom of an unsuspecting people. Treaties formed by the Executive of the United States are to be the law of the land. To cloak the Executive with legis- lative authority is setting aside our modern and much- boasted distribution of power into legislative, judicial, and executive — discoveries unknown to Locke and Montesquieu, and all the ancient writers. It certainly contradicts all the modern theory of government, and in practice must be tyranny. Memorandum! Get, if I can, The Federalist without buying it. It is not worth it." 1 * Journal, p. 75. CHAPTER V STATUS OF THE HEADS OF THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS INDIVIDUALLY The heads of the executive departments are the exec- utive agents of the President. Although the Senate par- ticipates in their appointment, it is now settled that the power of removal is vested in the President alone, and, with certain limitations, they are responsible to him alone. They are under no direct responsibility to Con- gress, except when special duties are laid upon them, and their relations to the nation at large arise only by the possibility that under certain remote contingencies they may be called upon to exercise the presidential functions for a limited period. The relations of the heads of the departments to the President have been defined from time to time by the Supreme Court. The questions decided have been of a limited nature, but in a general way the law is clearly settled. The President acts through the heads of the several departments, in relation to the subjects apper- taining to their respective duties. ^ It follows from this that the act of a department is deemed to be the act of the President. In the case of Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 Peters, 513, Mr. Justice Barbour in discussing an act of the Secretary of ^ Williams v. United States, 1 Howard, 298. INDIVIDUAL DEPARTMENT HEADS 53 War, said (at page 513) : " The President speaks and acts through the heads of the several departments in relation to subjects which appertain to their respective duties. Both military posts and Indian affairs, including agen- cies, belong to the War Department. Hence, we con- sider the act of the War Department, in requiring this reservation to be made, as being in legal contemplation the act of the President, and, consequently, that the reservation thus made was in legal effect a reservation made by the President within the terms of the act of Congress." This principle was approved in Hegler v. Faulkner, 153 U.S. 117, when acts of the Indian department were held to be acts of the President. This applies only to matters of administration, for where the President acts in a judicial capacity, it must appear that he acted on the matter himself. This was stated by Chief Justice Waite in the case of Dunkle v. United States, 122 U.S. 543, where the approval by the President of the finding of a court-martial was in ques- tion. In the case of Kendall, Postmaster-General of the United States V. United States, 12 Peters, 524, the power of the executive department heads was discussed. Kendall, the Postmaster-General, refused to permit payment of certain money allowed by his predecessor to contractors for work done for the department. These contractors, therefore, secured the passage of a bill in Congress direct- ing payment, and later the matter was heard on applica- tion for a writ of mandamus. Mr. Justice Thompson 54 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE said (at page 610) that the granting of this writ did not involve an interference with the executive power of the President. "The executive power is vested in a Presi- dent, and as far as his powers are derived from the Constitution, he is beyond the reach of any other de- partment, except in the mode prescribed by the Con- stitution through the impeaching power. But it by no means follows that every officer in every branch of the department is under the exclusive direction of the President. There are certain political duties imposed upon many officers in the executive department, the dis- charge of which is under the direction of the President. But it would be an alarming doctrine that Congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the Constitution, and in such cases, the duty and responsibility grow out of and are subject to the control of the law and not to the direction of the President. And this is emphatically the case where the duty enjoined is of a mere ministerial char- acter." The court intimated that the President could not refuse to allow the action ordered by Congress or restrict it by reason of his power as Executive. The general powers of the heads of departments are those necessary to the proper discharge of their duties. The head of a department has the same power as his predecessors to continue an act relating to the business of the department.'^ When required to give information on any subject he may do so by acting through his sub-? 1 United States v. MacDaniel, 7 Peters, 13. INDIVIDUAL DEPARTMENT HEADS 55 ordinates.^ He need not show statutory authority for every act done. There are numerous instances which cannot be anticipated by statutory provision in which he must exercise his discretion. ^ Courts cannot usually call upon heads of departments to answer in relation to official acts. The court said, in Decatur v. Paulding, 14 Peters, 522, that many acts required of the heads of the executive departments required use of discretion, and where not purely ministerial were not subject to order of the courts. A payment of a pension granted by Congress was here refused by the Secretary of the Navy, and the refusal sustained, although the law of Kendall v. United States was held good. Regulations of the executive departments have the force of law unless in conflict with acts of Congress, ^ and regulations prescribed by the heads of departments under congressional authority may lawfully support acts done in accordance therewith. The position of the heads of the executive departments is summed up in Cooley's Blackstone's Commentaries (book 1, pages 231 to 236). He there states: "The President, not the Cabinet, is responsible for all the measures of the Administration, and whatever is done by one of the heads of departments is considered as done by the President, through the proper executive agent. In this fact consists one important difference between the Executive (King) of Great Britain and of 1 Miller v. Mayor of New York, 109 U.S. 394. 2 United States v. MacDaniel, supra. 3 United States v. Symonds, 120 U.S. 49. 56 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE the United States; the acts of the former being con- sidered as those of his advisers, who alone are respon- sible therefor, while the acts of the advisers of the American Executive are considered as directed and con- trolled by him." This responsibility of the President arises from his in- vestment by the Constitution with the executive power. His control or power of direction over the executive offi- cers arises from his power of removal rather than from his power of appointment. Since the President's control over his Cabinet depends upon his power to remove any of the heads of the departments, some remarks concern- ing this power of removal are necessary in considering the status of those heads of departments. The presidential power of removal is so briefly and well set forth in Goodnow's "Comparative Administra- tive Law" (vol. I, p. 64) that it will best serve our purpose to quote what the President of Johns Hopkins University says: — " The Constitution gave the power of removal to no authority expressly. The question came up before the First Congress in the discussion of the act organizing the Department of Foreign Affairs. Although there was a difference of opinion in the Congress as to who under the Constitution possessed this power, it was finally de- cided by a very small majority that the power of re- moval was a part of the executive power and therefore belonged to the President. This was the recognized con- struction of the Constitution for a great number of years, although it did not meet with the approval of INDIVIDUAL DEPARTMENT HEADS 57 some of the most eminent statesmen. (This construc- tion of the Constitution was approved by the United States courts in United States v. Avery, Deady, 204.) After more than three quarters of a century Congress dehberately reversed this decision and by the Tenure- of-Office Acts of 1867-69 (later incorporated in the Revised Statutes as sections 1767-69) decided that the Constitution had not implicitly or expressly settled this point, and that Congress was therefore the body to de- cide who possessed the power of removal. Congress then decided that the power of removal of Senate ap- pointments belonged to the President and the Senate. (This was constitutional, United States v. Avery, Deady, 204.) For twenty years this was the law of the land, though no one was able to explain exactly what the Tenure-of-Office Acts meant, on account of the ob- scurity of their wording, but finally, in 1887, Congress repealed them. The result is that the early interpreta- tion of the Constitution must be regarded as the correct one at the present time. That is, the President alone has the power of removal of even Senate appointments. Though the Tenure-of-Ofiice Acts had the effect of temporarily weakening the power of the President, the complete power of removal had existed so long as to determine the position of the President in the National Government, and has been of incalculable advantage in producing an efficient and harmonious national adminis- tration. The benefits which followed the interpretation of the First Congress on this question were unquestion- ably the reason why the Tenure-of-Office Acts were \/' 58 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE finally repealed. From the power of removal has been evolved the President's power of direction and super- vision over the entire national administration. To it is due the recognition of the possession by the President of the administrative power." The proceedings in the First Congress to which Dr. Goodnow refers are set forth in full in the journals both of William Maclay, Senator from Pennsylvania, and of John Adams, then Vice-President, and the importance of the decision that the President alone possessed the power of removal cannot be overestimated. The de- cision was not only important to the Executive, but was a definite delimitation of the power of the Senate, which at the first session consisted of not more than eighteen members, and which showed a considerable tendency to become unduly powerful as an advisory council to the President. The bill for organizing the Department of Foreign Affairs was discussed on the 14th of July, 1789. This bill, drawn by Madison, who was then in the House of Representatives, provided that the members of the new department "shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and to he removable by the President." Senator Maclay objected strongly to this power of removal be- ing given to the President alone, declaring that "the depriving power should be the same as the appointing power." The Senate was equally divided on the ques- tion, nine for and nine against the President's "un- qualified power of removal," and Adams, as President of the Senate, decided in favor of the President's power. INDIVIDUAL DEPARTMENT HEADS 59 Maclay considered this a great gain for what he called the "Court Party," and an attempt to destroy the Senate.^ Charles Carroll of Carrollton, Senator from Maryland, spoke strongly in favor of the President's power of removal. "The burden of his discourse seemed to be the want of power in the President, and a desire of increasing it." ^ The Senators seemed fully to realize the importance of their decision in the power of removal, and Adams gives a digest of Charles Carroll of Carroll- ton's argument which is noteworthy: "The executive power is commensurate with the legislative and judicial powers. . . . The same power which creates must anni- hilate. ... If a minister is suspected to betray secrets to an enemy, the Senate not sitting, cannot the Presi- dent displace nor suspend? The States-General of France demanded that offices should be held during good behavior. It is improbable that a bad President should be chosen, — but may not bad Senators be chosen? Is there a due balance of power between the executive and legislative, either in the General Government or State Governments? [Montesquieu quoted here] English liberty will be lost when the legislative shall be more corrupt than the executive." ^ This outline of Carroll's argument is enlightening as to the uncertainty that ex- isted in those days as to the future of the new Govern- ment, even in the mind of one who had signed the Declaration of Independence. The President's power of removal thus secured has proved not only a great source 1 Journal of William Maclay, p. 116. ^ md,^ p. X13. ' Works of John Adams, vol. ill, pp. 408-12. 60 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE of indirect influence to the President over Congress, but, as Dr. Goodnow has said, is the basis of his administra- tive power. The passage of the Tenure-of-OfRce Acts was caused by the desire of Congress to prevent the removal of Secretary Stanton by President Johnson and arose from the bitter differences of the President and Congress on the subject of Reconstruction. Congress deprived the President of many of his constitutional prerogatives and attempted to change the system of government to a form of parliamentary responsibility to Congress. This perversion of the provisions of the Constitution did not, however, long continue, and to-day Congress has little direct power over the heads of the depart- ments. It may impose certain duties of a limited na- ture upon those who are heads of departments, and since they are officers of the United States, it would seem that they are liable to impeachment. In 1876, Secretary of War Belknap was impeached, but resigned before charges were formulated. It is unlikely that such proceedings will be frequent, since the only result could be removal of the impeached officer. It may be said that the cabinet officers have no direct relation to Congress, and are in no general way under its direc- tion. In the same way, it is true that the heads of the executive departments have no direct relation to the nation at large, aside from their responsibility as private persons to the courts, except as they may be called upon to perform the duties of President. Although no case has occurred in the history of the INDIVIDUAL DEPARTMENT HEADS 61 Republic in which such a state of affairs has existed, the matter of presidential succession of the Cabinet is worthy of careful notice. It is provided by law that, in case of inability of both President and Vice-President to per- form the duties of the office of President, the executive functions shall be exercised by one of the heads of the executive departments. The Revised Statutes (sections 146-50) provided for proceedings in case of vacancy in the office of both President and Vice-President, and for an election to fill the vacancies. The method there proposed required that in case of removal, death, resig- nation, or inability of both the President and Vice- President, the President of the Senate, or, if there were none, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives, for the time being, should act as President until the disability should be removed or a President elected. It was not contemplated that this interregnum should be of long duration, for the law (passed March 1, 1792) required that, whenever the offices of President and Vice-President should both become vacant, the Secre- tary of State should forthwith cause a notification to be made to the Executive of every State, requiring that electors of a President and Vice-President be ap- pointed or chosen in the several States. If the first Wednesday in December were two months distant from the time of the notification, the electors were to be ap- pointed or chosen within thirty-four days preceding such first Wednesday in December. If there should not be the space of two months before the first Wednesday of De- cember, the same date in the year next ensuing was to be 62 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE set as the time for the meeting and voting of the electors ; but in this last case, if the term for which the President and Vice-President last in office were elected would ex- pire on the 3d of March next ensuing, no special election was required. 1 This act was never brought into service, nor the effect of its provisions tested. It presented obvi- ous objections that in the beginning of the Republic were not fully appreciated. It might well occur that the Presi- dent of the Senate or the Speaker of the House would be members of a party opposed to that of the President or Vice-President, or that these officers, while belonging to the same party, would represent a faction opposed in policy to the former Executive. The disastrous results of a sudden change in the attitude and direction of the Executive need not be commented upon. This old act was of a piece with the early provisions that allowed a President and Vice-President to be elected who belonged to different parties. The development of the executive power and of the position of the heads of the executive departments is well shown in the Act of January 17, 1886, which repealed the old act for filling the presidential office. This act names as successor to the Presidency, in case of inability of both the President and Vice-President, the Secretary of State, and if there be none, or if he be incapacitated, the Secretary of the Treasury. Under the same circum- stances, on inability of this officer, the office is to be filled by the Secretary of War, the Attorney-General, the Postmaster-General, the Secretary of the Navy, or , 1 1 U.S. Stat. L. 239. INDIVIDUAL DEPARTMENT HEADS 63 the Secretary of the Interior, in the order named. The Departments of Agriculture, of Commerce, and of La- bor, not being at that time created, their heads were not named as possible Presidents. It is usually stated that the order of succession followed that of the estab- lishment in time of the departments, but this statement is based upon the erroneous belief that the Treasury Department antedated that of War. The succession fol- lowed, however, the order of precedence that has from the first been recognized among the members of the Cabinet. By the provisions of this act, the continuance of the policy of the Administration is assured until the election of the next President. The method of such election is not provided for, the act merely stating that if Congress be not at the time in session, or not to meet within twenty days thereafter, the person on whom the presi- dential duty should devolve shall issue a proclamation convening Congress in extraordinary session, giving twenty days' notice of the time of meeting. The act does not state what Congress is to do if it be in session or at its meeting, and no cause has arisen to test this act in any way. The act requires that the persons named shall have been appointed by the advice and consent of the Senate to the offices named in the act, possess the requisite con- stitutional qualifications, and be not under impeach- ment by the House of Representatives at the time the powers and duties of the office devolve upon them re- spectively. This last clause is of interest because of its 64 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE definite assumption that the members of the Cabinet are liable to impeachment as within the class of "civil officers of the United States" who may be removed from office on impeachment/ and for the further recognition of the fact that heads of the departments are among those "other officers of the United States," whose appointment is by the Constitution ^ made subject to the advice and consent of the Senate. * Constitution, art. ii, sec. 4. 2 jud., art. Ii, sec. 2. CHAPTER VI ORGANIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS Having traced the creation and development of the various departments and noted the present status of the executive officers of the Government, we are now in a position to consider the organization and regulations that control actual administration. It will be helpful to take a bird's-eye view of the Federal Executive as a whole before proceeding to consider the typical organ- ization of the departments. At the head of the Federal Executive stands the President alone. The Vice-Presi- dent has no place in the executive machinery, nor is there any other officer of the Government qualified to act as an assistant President. The Secretary to the President comes nearest of any of the federal officials to holding the place of assistant President, and some holders of this position have cast envious eyes at the title "Assistant to the President." The Secretary to the President is chief of the President's particular execu- tive assistants, and is the gateway of approach through which all must pass who desire to confer with the Chief Executive in person. The Secretary, therefore, occupies a position of extreme importance, and his personality and ability may make or mar the success of his chief's Administration. He is not a member of the Cabinet, although brought into intimate relation with the mem- bers of that unofficial body. Since he is really an exten- 66 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE sion of the President's own personality, there seems to be no reason for any change in the status that the Secre- tary to the President now maintains. He is assisted in his work by the executive clerk, the chief clerk, and the various office clerks, stenographers, doorkeepers, messengers, and other attaches of the President's office. There are ten members of the President's Cabinet who are heads of the ten executive departments. The fol- lowing is a bare tabulation of the principal officers or divisions under which the work assigned to the various departments is performed. The names of the various bureaus and divisions of many of the departments are not here set forth, nor is the following summary in any way a complete statement of the agencies through which the Federal Executive acts. The summary, however, will be of great assistance to the general reader by show- ing in brief space the functions of all the departments, and should I ever give to any body of students an ex- amination upon the subject of the Federal Executive, I should most strongly recommend them to study care- fully the following analysis. The ten members of the Cabinet and the chief agencies of the Federal Executive are: — I. The Secretary of State. The Counselor, Solicitor, the Assistant Secretary, Second Assistant Secretary, Third Assistant Secretary, Director of the Consular Service, Chief Clerk, Chiefs of Bureaus and Divisions. II. The Secretary of the Treasury. Three Assistant Secretaries, Chief Clerk, Chiefs of Divi- sions, Comptroller of the Currency, the Treasurer, Commis- sioner of Internal Revenue, Director of the Mint, Comptrol- ORGANIZATION OF DEPARTMENTS 67 ler of the Treasury, the Auditors f or'the various Departments, the Register of the Treasury, Bureau of Engraving and Printing, Bureau of the Public Health, Coast Guard Serv- ice, Supervising Architects' Office. III. The Secretary of War. Assistant Secretary, Assistant and Chief Clerk, Chiefs of Divisions, General Staff Corps, the Offices of the Adjutant- General, Inspector-General, Judge-Advocate-General, Quar- termaster General, Surgeon-General, Chief of Engineers, Chief of Ordnance, Chief Signal Officer, Bureau of Insular Affairs (Philippine Commission, Porto Rico Government, and Dominican Receivership), Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, Office of Public Buildings, United States Engineer Office, Board of Ordnance and Fortifications. IV. The Attorney-General. The Solicitor-General, the Assistant to the Attorney- General, Assistant Attorneys-General, Attorneys and Special Assistants, Chief Clerk. V. The Postmaster-General. The First, Second, Third, and Fourth Assistant Post- masters-General, with the Chief Clerks and forces of their respective offices. VI. The Secretary of the Navy, The Assistant Secretary, the Aides for Operations, Marine Corps, Personnel, Material, Education, Director of the Navy Yards, Chief Clerk of the Department, the Office of the Admiral of the Navy, the Bureaus of Navigation, Yards and Docks, Ordnance, Construction and Repair, Steam Engineer- ing, Supplies and Accounts, Medicine and Surgery, Office of the Judge-Advocate-General, the General Board, etc. VII. The Secretary of the Interior. Two Assistant Secretaries, Chief Clerk, the Commission- ers of the General Land Office, of the Patent Office, of Pen- sions, of Indian Affairs, of Education, the Directors of the Geological Survey, the Reclamation Service, and of Mines. VIII. The Secretary of Agriculture. The Assistant Secretary, Chief Clerk, Solicitor, Chiefs of the Weather Bureau, of Animal Industry, of Plant Industry, of Forest Service, of Chemistry, of Soils, of Entomology, etc. 68 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE IX. The Secretary of Commerce. The Assistant Secretary, Chief Clerk, Director of the Census, Commissioner of Corporations, Chief of the Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, and the Directors or Commissioners of the Bureaus of Standards, Fisheries, Light- houses, and Navigation. The Superintendent of the Coast and Geodetic Survey. X. The Secretary of Labor. The Assistant Secretary, the Chief Clerk, the Commis- sioners of Immigration, of Naturalization, and of Labor Statistics, the Chief of the Children's Bureau. In a general way the departments are organized upon the same plan, and are subject to similar regulations for the conduct of their business, but from the nature of their work and the mode of their development it neces- sarily results that marked differences exist in the internal structure of each. In the early days, the routine business was apportioned among the several clerks, while the Secretary and chief clerk of each department held the position of executive and directing officers. In this way one clerk would have entire charge of a certain division of work, under the supervision of the head of the depart- ment and the chief clerk, who held the post of general superintendent of all the subordinate officers and em- ployees. As the business of the department grew, it was necessary to increase the force employed on the separate divisions of the work, and in this way developed the present system of coordinate subdivisions that exists, under different names, in all of the departments. The Secretary and assistant secretaries at the head of the de- partment, with a chief clerk having direct supervision of all inferior clerks, form the executive management of ORGANIZATION OF DEPARTMENTS 69 the department. The subdivisions of each department are in a similar manner under the direction of an officer denominated Director, Commissioner, Chief of Bureau, Chief of Division, or Superintendent, to agree with the designations applying to the subdivisions in each of the departments. In the Department of State these sub- divisions are termed Biu*eaus, and the names of the Bureau of Accounts, the Consular and the Diplomatic Bureaus, indicate the duties of these subdivisions. In the Treasury Department these unitary organizations are simply termed Divisions, with Chiefs of Divisions, while the Bureaus of the Department of Commerce are most frequently in charge of Commissioners or Directors. The heads of these subdivisions are frequently aided in their executive duties by chief clerks or assistants, whose position in the subdivision corresponds some- what to that held by the Chief Clerk of the Department. The Treasury Department differs from the typical organization in that the Comptroller of the Treasury, the Register, the Treasurer, the Supervising Architect, and the other officers, like the Director of the Mint and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, occupy a posi- tion of greater independent importance than that held by the chiefs of the ordinary bureaus or divisions, cor- responding more to the various commissioners in the Department of Commerce. The regular work of the departments is conducted in these divisions by a great company of clerks whose duties and responsibilities vary in a great degree. In addition to these clerks, there are the miscellaneous employees of all sorts, — watchmen. 70 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE laborers, messengers, — that are essential to the conduct of the great business organizations. A clear comprehen- sion of the detailed organization of each department can be got only from an examination of the register of each department, but is not essential to a general under- standing of the department management. It will be in- structive, however, to examine in detail the register of some of the departments in order to see the general plan. The State Department has, perhaps, the simplest or- ganization, and will, in a limited way, serve as a typical illustration. Its organization is as follows: — Counselor for the Department of State. The Assistant Secretary. Second Assistant Secretary. Third Assistant Secretary. Director of the Consular Service. Chief Clerk. Solicitor. Foreign Trade Advisers. TDhief of Bureau of — Accounts and disbursing clerk; Appointments; Citizenship; Consular; Diplomatic; Indexes and Archives; Rolls and Library. Chief of Division of — Far-Eastern Affairs; Information; Latin- American Affairs; Mexican Affairs; Near-Eastern Affairs; Western-European Affairs. Translators. Assistant Solicitors. Private Secretary to the Secretary of State. Law Clerks. Confidential Clerk to the Secretary of State. ORGANIZATION OF DEPARTMENTS 71 It would be extremely tiresome to go through all the departments in this manner, and the general organization of each will appear from the duties it performs. The character of the duties assigned to the assistant secretaries differs somewhat in the various departments, but as a rule they have entire direction of specified branches of the work and in many departments enjoy a great measure of independence. The duties of the chief clerk are practically the same in every department. He is the executive ofiicer of the department under the Secretary, and his position is one of great importance. It was a matter of frequent occur- rence in the early days of the Government for the chief clerk to become Acting Secretary during the temporary absence or upon a vacancy in the office of the Secretary. At present the chief clerk has the general supervision of the clerks and employees, and of the business of the department. Each clerk is required to record the time of his daily arrival and departure from the department, and at the end of the month these reports are filed with the chief clerk. It is the rule in most of the departments that no clerk is allowed to leave the building during office hours without express permission of the chief clerk, who is thus in a position to know at all times what force he has available for the extra work that the exigencies of the service may at any time call for. After the daily mail is opened and indexed by the proper persons, it is the practice in most of the departments to have it read by the chief clerk and distributed by him to the assistant secretaries, or otherwise dealt with, and in the same way 72 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE all letters written by the department come under his supervision. He has also supervision of the various pub- lications of the department and control and oversight of its property. The great body of clerks in the various bureaus and divisions are all subjected to some sort of examination before being employed by the Government, and a large part of them are subject to the rules of the so-called "classified service." This classification has steadily grown in importance. Sections 163 and 164 of the Re- vised Statutes provided for the arrangement of clerks in four classes, distinguished as the first, second, third, and fourth class, and for the examination and qualification of these clerks before their appointment. These sections are superseded by the Civil Service Act of January 16, 1883,^ which makes more compre- hensive provisions for examinations for testing the fit- ness of applicants for the public service, and for appoint- ments and promotions as the result of such examinations. By this act the United States Civil-Service Commission was established, to consist of three commissioners, not more than two of whom shall be adherents of the same party. These commissioners are to be appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The act retains the old classification of clerks, and makes minute regulations as to the manner and modes of conducting examinations, and for making ap- pointments and promotions from the lists of successful competitors. It is only necessary for our purpose to note 1 22 U.S. Stat. L. 403. ORGANIZATION OF DEPARTMENTS 73 that some examination is necessary for almost all per- sons in the government service, and that for those classifications of clerks that have been placed by the President or by the law itself in the classified service, the regulations are carefully provided in order to secure the most efficient service to the Government. There were 395,460 positions in the executive civil service on June 30, 1912, according to statistics based upon reports to the Commission, of which 236,061 were classified subject to competitive examination under the civil-service rules. The number of classified positions was increased by about 20,000 by the classification of artisans in the navy-yard service under executive order of December 7, 1912. Persons employed merely as laborers or workmen and persons nominated for con- firmation by the Senate are exempted from the require- ments of classification. Within these limits certain classes of positions are excepted from examination — among them, Indians in the Indian service, attorneys, pension examining surgeons, field deputy marshals, and a few employees whose duties are of an important con- fidential or fiduciary nature. By an executive order of October 15, 1912, the President classified all fourth-class post-offices not before classified, the number being 36,236. Various examinations are held in every State and Territory at least twice a year. The examinations range in scope from technical, professional, or scientific sub- jects to those based wholly upon the physical condition and experience of the applicant, and in some cases do not require ability to read or write. During the fiscal 74 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE year ended June 30, 1912, 33,240 persons were appointed through examinations, including 12,807 navy-yard em- ployees. The salaries of all persons in the service of the depart- ments are provided by law, from those of the Secretaries to those of the lowest grade of laborers. It was pro- vided that the heads of departments should receive an annual emolument of $10,000,^ but by the Act of January 20, 1847, this was reduced to $8000, and by the Act of March 4, 1911, increased to $12,000, which is the present salary of all cabinet officers. The assistant secre- taries receive from $4000 to $6000. The clerks of the fourth class are allowed $1800, while those of the third, second, and first classes receive respectively $1600, $1400, and $1200. The lowest grade of employees are classed as laborers and are paid $720. The salaries of chief clerks, commissioners, and others vary from $2000 to $6000. Many details of general departmental regulations are provided by the Revised Statutes of the United States, but the only remaining matter of interest is the provi- sion that legal advice is to be had by the heads of the departments only from the Attorney-General. ^ The remaining matters of organization and regulations are best seen by examining the departments separately. I am indebted to Hon. John A. Mcllhenny, President of the United States Civil Service Commission, for the following information as to the civil service on February 15, 1915. The extent of the executive civil service is as 1 U.S. Rev. Stat., sec. 160. ^ j^icl^^ gee. 187. ORGANIZATION OF DEPARTMENTS 75 follows, based upon reports furnished by the several de- partments, to the Commission. Owing to inaccuracies in this method of reporting and inadvertent omissions, the figures must be accepted as only approximate. On June 30, 1914, there were 482,721 officers and employees in the executive civil service. Of these, 292,460 held positions subject to competitive examination under the civil-service rules, an increase of 9863 during the year. Of the 190,261 persons whose positions are not sub- ject to competitive examination under the civil-service rules, 10,652 are presidential appointees, 8650 being postmasters of the first, second, and third classes; 5042 are clerks in charge of contract postal stations; 73,000 are clerks in third and fourth class post-offices; 7910 are mail messengers; 12,532 are star-route, steamboat, and screen- wagon contractors; 4641 are pension examining surgeons; 28,605 are engaged on the Isthmian Canal work, chiefly as laborers and minor employees; 729 are employees of the Department of Commerce, mostly of the Census Bureau; and 26,339 are unclassified laborers not elsewhere herein enumerated, of whom 6500 are subject to tests of physical fitness under labor regula- tions. The remaining 20,811 are excepted from exami- nation under Schedule B of the civil-service rules, of whom 1069 are employed in Washington and the others in branches of the field service. Few important posi- tions are excepted from competitive examination under Schedules A and B. Their great variety will be seen by reference to those schedules. CHAPTER VII FUNCTIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS IN MAINTAINING A "MORE PERFECT UNION" THE DEPARTMENTS OF STATE, THE TREASURY, AND THE INTERIOR We have considered the constitutional authority for the executive administration, and the manner in which Congress has from time to time provided for the needs of this administration by the estabhshment of the vari- ous departments. We have also examined the status of the heads of the departments, collectively as an Advi- sory Council, or Cabinet, and individually as executive agents in control of separate divisions of the administra- tion. I have attempted to give some idea of the general organization of these independent divisions. In the re- maining chapters, I shall endeavor to show the scope of the Government's administration, and the methods it employs in fulfilling its functions. In order to do this, we will take up the departments separately, and indicate what their duties are and how discharged. It will be im- possible to go into the historical development of the various functions, for this would include a large part of the history of the nation, and it will, therefore, be necessary to pass over many things that invite careful study. The circumstances attending the various treaties concluded under the direction of the Department of State; the results of the many arbitrations it has ar- STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 77 ranged; the results of the work of the War Department in engineering matters; the results of the labors of the Geological and Coast Survey, — all these fill many- volumes of reports and furnish much matter of interest to the student of history and government. We shall have to pass them by, however, with such brief notice as will suffice to make them intelligible as illustrations of what has been accomplished by the working of the ad- ministrative machine whose mechanism we are exam- ining. We have already seen that there are ten executive departments, in the order in which they are at present ranked,^ — ^ State, Treasury, War, Justice, Post-Office, Navy, Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, Labor. Each of these executive departments performs certain func- tions of the Federal Executive. It is impossible to make a rigid classification of the functions of the Executive they perform, but it has seemed to me, taking the pre- amble to the Constitution as a guide to the functions of the Executive, that the work of these ten departments falls into four divisions. The Departments of State, the Treasury, and the Interior deal with foreign and do- mestic relations and the finances of the Government itself. I have, therefore, considered them together under the title of this chapter, "Functions of the Executive Departments in Maintaining a 'More Perfect Union.' " The work done by these three departments is necessary for the existence of the United States as a nation; it must have funds; it must have dealings with its neigh- * Congressional Directory, December, 1914. 78 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE bors; and it must look out for its public lands and other internal matters. The Departments of War, the Navy, and Justice are all for the purpose of "insuring domestic tranquillity." The first two departments are primarily for the purpose of providing a common defense against foreign enemies, although the War Department in the Civil War, and in the occasional use of regular troops in case of internal disorder, protected the people of the nation from internal disintegration and turmoil. The Department of Justice devotes itself to the preservation of that portion of domestic tranquillity which is not provided for through the police and legal departments of the States. I shall discuss these three departments in the same chapter. The Departments of Agriculture, of Commerce, and of Labor will be considered under a chapter entitled, "Functions of the Executive Depart- ments in 'Promoting the General Welfare.'" We have thus classified all of the ten departments except that of the Post-Office. I have already pointed out that as a purely governmental function, the Post-OfRce is an anomaly. It, however, in terms of the preamble to the Constitution, devotes itself most certainly to securing for the people of the United States certain of "the bless- ings of liberty." Unlike the Departments of Agriculture, of Commerce, and of Labor, it does not promote the general welfare of any one element of national prosper- ity. It is not necessary like the Departments of State, the Treasury, and the Interior, for the maintenance of the Government itself, nor is it necessary, like the Departments of War, the Navy, and Justice, for the STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 79 protection either of the Government or the individual citizen. Primarily, with its means of transporting intel- ligence and its banking facilities of money orders and savings banks, it is a convenience to the individual citizen as well as to the Government itself, and may be regarded more as a "blessing of liberty" than as an essential to securing or protecting the Union, a luxury of liberty rather than a necessity of liberty. We will first consider the foreign relations of the United States as cared for by the State Department. The Government of the United States is in intimate relation with twenty American Republics, and there are at Washington more diplomatic representatives of for- eign countries than in any other capital. In the period from 1896 to 1909 the foreign trade of this country had been growing from $1,662,331,612 to the enormous total of $2,950,275,817, an increase of seventy-eight per cent. This increase in trade alone greatly added to the work of the diplomatic and consular offices of the Depart- ment. The war with Spain had marked a new epoch in the history of American foreign relations, and the State Department was called upon to deal with a multitude of questions with which before it had not been concerned. A reorganization of the department was imperatively demanded by reason of its greatly increased functions. The Hague Conferences, boundary adjustments, arbitra- tions, and the efforts of the United States to improve conditions in Central America were among the active duties of the department. The increasing number of questions arising from the development of Mexico and 80 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE the protection of interests of nearly forty thousand of our citizens who had temporarily taken up their residence and invested nearly $1,000,000,000 of American money in that country, together with the general increase in the work of the department, caused its reorganization under the direction of Secretary Root in 1909. In this reorgan- ization there were created in the department a number of new officials and divisions. The posts of Counsel for the Department and Resident Diplomatic Officer were posts of importance that were added to the department. The post of Counselor, under the Administration of President Wilson and the secretaryship of Mr. Bryan, assumed added importance in the fact that by the prac- tice adopted, the Counselor, rather than the First As- sistant Secretary of State, becomes Acting Secretary of State in the absence of that officer. A Division of Wes- tern-European Affairs, one of Near-Eastern Affairs, and various other divisions and bureaus were created in the department. Aside from the time and attention required by his general duties to the President, as a member of the Cabinet, involving many questions of domestic poHcy, the Secretary of State is primarily responsible for the conduct of foreign relations. He has charge of all mat- ters relating to the public Ministers and Consuls of the United States, and with the representatives of foreign powers accredited to it, and to negotiations of every character relating to foreign affairs. He is also the medium of correspondence between the President and the chief executives of the several States, and has cus- STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 81 tody of the Great Seal, which he affixes to all executive proclamations, to various commissions, and to warrants for the extradition of fugitives from justice. He is also the custodian of the treaties made with foreign states, and of the laws of the United States, and the Depart- ment of State grants and issues passports and ex- equaturs to foreign consuls in the United States. The immigration into this country increased from 343,267 in 1896 to 751,786 in 1909. The emigration increased from 329,558 in 1896 to 586,452 in 1909. Every immi- grant coming to this country, and every American citi- zen going to a foreign country, in one way or another is likely to cause work for the Department of State. The personnel of the organization of the Department of State has been given in detail in Chapter VI. The work of the department is chiefly conducted through its four principal divisions, — Latin-American Affairs, Far- Eastern Affairs, Near-Eastern Affairs, Western-Euro- pean Affairs, — its Division of Information, the Diplo- matic Bureau, the Consular Bureau, and the Bureau of Citizenship. Bureaus of Appointment, of Indexes and Archives, of Accounts, of Rolls and Library, and of In- formation are subsidiary elements in the work of the department. In addition to the general direction of the Department of State, the Secretary personally receives the representatives of foreign countries for the discussion of diplomatic business and is in touch with the Com- mittee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. The office of the Assistant Secretary, which corre- sponds to that of Under-Secretary or Vice-Minister for 82 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE Foreign Affairs in foreign offices, has also general direc- tion of the department under the Secretary. The prac- tice as to departmental duties varies in different Admin- istrations, but as a general rule the Assistant Secretary- does not specialize, but holds himself in readiness to take the place of the Secretary in general matters of direction. The Second Assistant Secretary of State is charged with detailed treatment of diplomatic and po- litical questions, while the administrative work of the diplomatic service as distinguished from the treatment of subjects of international intercourse, is delegated to the Third Assistant Secretary of State. The Counselor devotes himself to the study of pending diplomatic questions, but as I have indicated, under the present Administration, is sometimes called upon to assume the duties of the Secretary in his absence. Before Secretary Lansing succeeded Mr. Bryan, he performed most im- portant functions as Counselor. The Division of Latin-American Affairs has charge of all diplomatic and consular questions relating to Mexico, Central and South America, and the West Indies. As an index of the amount of its work it may be noted that it annually prepares more than nine thousand communi- cations, such as instructions to diplomatic and consular offices by mail and telegraph, and notes to diplomatic and consular representatives of other governments. It deals with such questions as the obtaining permission in Mexico for the construction of such work as that of the Colorado River projects, the settlement of such mining cases as the Rincon Mine Company's case, enforcement STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 83 of the neutrality laws, the release of Americans charged with various offenses, and all matters generally arising in the ordinary intercourse of American citizens and the Mexican Government. In Haiti, the State Department has at times exercised a large sphere of influence, among its most important achievements being that of securing participation of American financiers in the recent finan- cial adjustment of Haitian affairs. In Venezuela there have been such matters as the settlement of the Orinoco Company's cases against Venezuela for $385,000, pend- ing since 1890, and the settlement of various other claims of American interests. The Division of Latin-American Affairs is one of the most important divisions in the State Department, and will become increasingly im- portant as our relations with Mexico and Central and South America grow stronger. The Division of Far-Eastern Affairs has charge of matters relating to Japan, China, Siberia, Hongkong, French Indo-China, Siam, the Straits Settlements, Borneo, East Indies, India, and in general the Far East. As examples of subjects studied by the Division of Far- Eastern Affairs there may be cited matters concerning the policy of that division, tending to the cooperation of the United States with the other great Powers in relation to the political integrity of China and the "open door" of equality of commercial opportunity. Such matters as the protection of American missionaries and the general protection of American interests constantly occupy the attention of this division. The Division of Near-Eastern Affairs relates to Ger- 84 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE many, Austria-Hungary, Russia, Roumania, Servia, Bul- garia, Montenegro, Turkey, Greece, Italy, Abyssinia, Persia, Egypt, and colonies belonging to countries of this series. This is naturally a very important division. Railway concessions in Turkey, the diplomatic aspects of the potash controversy with Germany, questions re- lating to the treatment of American Jews in Russia, and similar matters fall into the province of this division. The remaining division of the State Department is that of Western-European Affairs, and deals with matters re- lating to Great Britain (Canada, Australia, New Zea- land, and British colonies not elsewhere enumerated), Portugal, Spain, France, Morocco, Belgium, the Congo, Switzerland, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, Lux- emburg, Denmark, and Liberia. All sorts of questions come before this division, but in the main it is sufficient to say that it deals with all international questions be- tween the United States and the countries in that divi- sion, relating to the rights of the United States or to the rights of any of its citizens. The above is, I fear, a not especially interesting de- scription of the functions of the State Department, but it is impossible to condense in a few pages an any more instructive account of its work. There is no department in the Government which deals with more interesting questions. They are most essentially human questions, affecting the relations between nations and individual men, and concerning such dealings only detailed ac- counts can portray their living interests. The seizure by English cruisers of American vessels as carriers of contra- STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 85 band articles during the present European war, the rights of neutral vessels in the North Sea, and hundreds of vital and important questions for the State Depart- ment arise from this great international conflict. All I am attempting to do is to indicate in a general way the duties of the department, and it is impossible for me to stray into the alluring realms of diplomatic history. It is not improper to say, however, that although much of great interest has been written of the diplomatic history of this country, there are still unexplored fields in the archives of the State Department inviting the work of the student in American history. ^ The heads of most of the executive departments make their annual reports of the work of their departments to the President, who transmits them to Congress. As I have already pointed out, the Treasury Department in its organization differs in a number of particulars from the departments that were created coincidently with it, War and State. The management of the finances of the Government seemed to the members of the First Congress and to the men who formulated the plans for the Treasury Department of such great importance that 1 President Wilson, in Cleveland, on January 29, 1916, stated the policy of the United States as follows: "America has not only to assert her rights to her own life within her own borders, but she has to assert the right of equal and just treatment of her citizens wherever they go. And she has something more than that to insist upon, because she has made up her mind long ago that she is going to stand, so far as this whole Western Hemisphere is concerned, for the right of people to choose their own policies without foreign in- fluence or interference." In the first instance, the carrying-out of this generally accepted policy falls upon the State Department. 86 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE Congress was given some control over the Treasury, whereas it had none over the other departments. The work of the Treasury Department has assumed enormous proportions. This can be noted in no more striking manner than by an examination of the estimates of government disbursements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1914. In his report for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1912, Secretary MacVeagh placed the above appropriations at $732,556,023.03. These estimates were exclusive of those for expenditures for the Panama Canal, which were to be paid from bond sales, and those of the postal service, which were to be repaid from postal receipts. The estimated expenditures for the Panama Canal for the same period are $30,174,432.11. The or- dinary receipts during the current fiscal year of 1913 were estimated at $711,000,000, and the ordinary dis- bursements at $670,800,000, showing an expected ex- cess of receipts of $40,200,000. It may be interesting to notice some of the elements of receipts and some of the elements of disbursements for the year 1913 in order to see from what sources the Government realizes its enormous revenues and for what purposes these moneys are expended. Of these estimated receipts $328,000,000 were expected from customs; $297,000,000 from internal revenue taxes, — that is to say from taxes on spirits, oleomargarine, etc. ; $29,000,000, from the tax on the net income of corporations; and $57,000,000 from miscella- neous sources. Of the estimated expenditures from these receipts, $177,000,000 was for the civil establishment of the Government, including all expenses of Congress, the STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 87 executive departments, etc.; $158,000,000 for the War Department; $130,000,000 for the Navy Department; $18,000,000 for the Indian service; $22,800,000 for in- terest on the pubhc debt; and $165,000,000 for pensions. It will be noted that the amount paid in pensions nearly equals the cost of the maintenance of the civil estab- lishment of the Government. As to this enormous sum for pensions, it is interesting to note the comment made by former President Taft upon the subject of pensions in his "Popular Govern- ment," published by the Yale University Press in 1913. On page 524, he says: "Those pensions are not properly a part of the expense of the military system of the United States and ought not to play a part in determin- ing the expenses of our present army and navy. They are due to our not having an adequate army ready in the past. Certain it is that the larger army and navy we maintain, the less in size will be our pension list after another war, should we have one, because the more adequate provision we make for a prompt and active campaign, the less men we shall enlist and the less their loss of life and limb." It is necessary to call attention to the above receipts and expenditures of the Government in order that the usual well-informed American may realize that the Treasury Department has much more important duties than the opening of travelers' trunks upon their return from a summer vacation in Europe, or the laundering of bank-notes. The latter function of the Treasury De- partment has created considerable interest and some 88 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE amusement throughout the country; but this reform, by which old notes are Uterally washed, dried, and ironed, has been estimated to mean a saving to the Government of more than $500,000 a year. The principal officers of the Treasury Department are the Secretary of the Treasury and his three Assistant Secretaries, the Comptroller of the Treasury, the Treas- urer of the United States, and the Comptroller of the Currency. There are also among the important officers of the department, the Supervising Architect, the Au- ditors for the various departments, the Register of the Treasury, the Director of the Mint, and the Commis- sioner of Internal Revenue. By the act of Congress creating the department, the Secretary of the Treasury is charged with the management of the national finances. It is his business to prepare plans for the realization of revenue and for the maintenance of the public credit. He superintends the collection of the revenue, and directs the forms of keeping and rendering public ac- counts; grants warrants for all moneys drawn from the Treasury in pursuance of appropriations, and for the payment of moneys into the Treasury, and in the form I have indicated above submits annually to Congress estimates of the probable revenues and disbursements of the Government. The work of the department, there- fore, consists principally in collecting and disbursing money. It also, through the Mint and the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, issues the coin and notes which are the legal medium of exchange and are commonly called " money." STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 89 The revenues of the Government are derived chiefly from the customs duties on articles imported into the United States, and from the taxes upon spirits, tobacco, oleomargarine, etc., known as internal revenue. For the collection of these two sources of revenue, the United States is divided into territorial districts. There are a certain number of internal-revenue districts and a cer- tain number of ports of entry through which goods may be brought into the United States, and where, through the collectors of the port, the customs duties may be paid. The Treasury Department, therefore, has a type of territorial organization, and in this particular it re- sembles the Department of Justice, which divides the United States into federal districts for the purpose of administering the laws of the United States. At the present time the War Department has a very meager territorial organization. In time I believe that the United States will be divided into military districts re- sembling those of the corps districts in Germany and other nations that maintain an adequate military es- tablishment, but at the present time it is to be noted that the Treasury Department and the Department of Justice are the only two departments that have divided the United States into districts for the practical pur- pose of administration. There are three Assistant Secretaries of the Treasury. All three of these are in charge of various avenues of income and disbursement. The Assistant Secretary in charge of customs, controls all matters pertaining to the customs service. Another Assistant Secretary is in 90 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE charge of certain fiscal bureaus and has supervision of all matters relating to the Bureau of the Mint, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, the Office of the Treasurer of the United States, the Office of the Comp- troller of the Currency, the Office of the Comptroller of the Treasury, the Auditors of the several departments, the Register of the Treasury, the Secret-Service Divi- sion, the Division of Public Moneys, the Division of Loans and Currency, the Division of Bookkeeping and Warrants, the Bureau of Internal Revenue, the Divi- sion of Printing and Stationery, the Division of Mail and Files, and the Office of the Disbursing Clerk. The remaining Assistant Secretary is in charge of certain miscellaneous divisions of the Department and super- vises matters relating to the public health service, the Supervising Architect, the selection of sites for public buildings, the revenue-cutter service, life-saving serv- ice (the last two were consolidated, January 28, 1915, as the Coast Guard), appointments, and the bond divi- sion. If we consider the matters coming under the direc- tion of each of the Secretaries, we shall gain a general understanding of the functions of the Department. Since the foundation of the Government the question of the tariff has been one of the most important ques- tions of national policy. The necessity for a central government became apparent after the Revolution pri- marily for a proper treatment of customs duties, and such has been the history of the confederation of many nations. The regulations upon which goods may be im- ported and exported from one State into another affect STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 91 most vitally the business of each of these communities, and after the Revolution there existed a condition in which one of the former colonies of Great Britain was attempting to exact customs duties from another of its fellow colonies. The collection of revenue by cus- toms duties is what is called indirect taxation, and has usually been considered the least painful method of raising revenue for the maintenance of a govern- ment. At present the nation is in the midst of the uncertainties which attend the recent revision of the tariff, and upon the question of the fundamental prin- ciples which underlie the imposition of customs duties the people of the United States have always been di- vided. It is without the scope of this book to go into questions of the relative merits of high or low protec- tion to American industries. The tariff law which has recently been adopted by Congress was formulated by the President, with the advice of his Secretary of the Treasury and the leaders of his party in Congress, to meet the demands of the successful party in the last national election. The tariff legislation itself is, there- fore, a matter of great executive concern, and the part that President Wilson has played in the present tariff legislation shows in a most marked degree the powerful position of the President under the present party sys- tem of government. It is a matter of great interest to note the change in this particular since 1884, when Pres- ident Wilson published his book "Congressional Gov- ernment." In that book the President said: "The mem- bers of the Cabinet have the privilege of advising him 92 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE [the President] as to matters in most of which he has no final action without the concurrence of the Senate, but the gist of all policy is decided by the legislative and not the executive will." In 1884, before the repeal of the Tenure-of-Office Acts, Congress was the dominating element in the Na- tional Government. To-day the President is the domi- nating influence in the policies of the nation. President Wilson foresaw this when in 1900 he wrote the pre- face to the fifteenth edition of " Congressional Govern- ment," in which, commenting on the increased powers of the Executive caused by the Spanish War, he said: "It may be that the new leadership of the Executive, inasmuch as it is likely to last, will have a very far- reaching effect upon our whole method of government. It may give the heads of the executive departments a new influence upon the action of Congress. It may bring about as a consequence an integration which will substitute statesmanship for government by mass meetings." As to the actual collection of customs, it is only neces- sary to say that under the present tariff almost every- thing that is imported into the United States must pay a tax and that the Treasury Department collects this tax. For this purpose at each port of entry of the United States there exists a complicated organization, the collector of customs, appraisers, surveyors, special agents, customs agents, and vessels of the revenue- cutter service, which see to it that illicit importation of goods is prevented. STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 93 The second great source of national income is that from the internal revenue. The tax upon the net income of corporations is the smaller source of this revenue. The larger part of the income of the Government from this source comes from the tax upon all alcoholic pro- ductions, tobacco, and oleomargarine. Every distillery in the United States has attached to it revenue officers of the Government, who watch carefully all the proc- esses of production, and see to it that each barrel of whiskey or keg of beer pays its tax to the United States. The illicit distilleries in the mountains of Tennessee and elsewhere have been the subject of novels and are famil- iar subjects to the general reader. A large part of the activities of the officers, who come under the direction of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, is devoted to the collection of the tax on oleomargarine. This is an absurd tax and it is to be hoped that in time Congress will repeal it. When it was first discovered that there could be made from the fats of animals a very excellent substitute for butter, great opposition to the sale of the so-called "oleomargarine" arose on the part of the dairymen and the heavy tax upon its sale was imposed. At the present time the Government imposes a tax of 10 cents per pound on all artificially colored oleomar- garine, and a tax of one quarter cent per pound on oleomargarine in its natural white or yellow state, not made yellow like butter by the addition of artificial coloration. Anybody, with an old tin can and some hot water and a dark room in a back cellar, can manufac- ture illicitly what is sometimes called "moonshine but- 94 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE ter," and thus defraud the Government out of nine and three-quarters cents a pound. The temptation to do this and the ease with which it can be done is a constant menace to honest dealers in oleomargarine, and it is to be hoped that the laws relating to this form of internal revenue will be modified. In the above manner were obtained most of the revenues of the Government be- fore the passage of the act imposing a tax on personal incomes above certain amounts. It is too early yet to discuss the results of this new tax. ^ All expenditures are under the direction of the Secre- tary of the Treasury. The Comptroller of the Treasury and the various auditors of the department supervise these expenditures. The Comptroller of the Treasury prescribes the forms of keeping and rendering all pub- lic moneys except those relating to the postal revenues. Certain officers of the Government are bonded as dis- bursing officers, and only disbursing officers can draw warrants upon the Treasurer of the United States and expend its funds. Upon the application of disbursing officers, the head of any executive department, or other independent establishment not under any of the execu- tive departments, the Comptroller of the Treasury is required to render his advance decision upon any ques- tion involving the payment to be made by them or under them, which decision, when rendered, governs the Audi- tor and the Comptroller in the settlement of the ac- count involving that payment. There are Auditors for the Treasury Department, for the War Department, for the Interior Department, for the Navy Depart- STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 95 ment, for the Post-OfEce Department, and one for the "State and Other Departments," whose duty is to re- ceive and settle all accounts for the departments under their direction. The Treasurer of the United States is charged with the receipt and disbursements of all pubhc moneys that may be deposited in the Treasury at Washington or in the various subtreasuries in New York and various other large cities, and in the national-bank depositories, and in addition has charge of the actual custody of the moneys in the Treasury. The Comptroller of the Cur- rency has supervision of the national banks: their or- ganization and examination, and the preparation, issue, and redemption of their notes which form a large por- tion of the circulation of the United States. There has just been enacted by Congress a bill for the reformation of the currency, which provides for a new system of government of the national banks of the country. With the exception of immediate and adequate National De- fense, this and the recent tariff legislation form the most important questions at present before the Government for solution, but it is too special a subject for considera- tion in a book of this nature. From the above it will be seen that the power of the Secretary of the Treasury is very great. On June 30, 1912, the available balance in the general fund of the United States Treasury was $167,152,478.99. The work- ing balance in the vaults of the Treasury at this time was over $98,000,000. The Secretary of the Treasury has charge of the disposition of these funds, and what 96 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE disposition of them he authorizes to be made is of the utmost importance to the communities in which he se- lects depositories and to the country at large. At the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 1912, there were in actual operation 7394 national banks with an author- ized capital of $1,040,545,435. Its relation to this enor- mous aggregation of capital whose activities reach into every community of the United States is another source of power for the Treasury Department. It is a most in- teresting commentary, as I have already pointed out in a previous chapter, upon the wisdom of the founders of the Grovernment that the administration of the national resources has been since its institution honest and effi- cient. According to the theories of some prominent "states- men" of to-day, a government does not really need an army and navy to preserve it, and although a police department is convenient, it is not a necessity of gov- ernment. There has never, however, been any question that, in addition to a treasury and a department for dealing with its neighbors, a government must have as an essential to its existence a proper "Home Affairs Department." This the United States has in the De- partment of the Interior, which we will now consider. President Lowell, of Harvard University, writing of the executive departments in the Government of England, says: "The Home Office is a kind of residuary legatee. It is entrusted with all the work of the secretariat that has not been especially assigned to the remaining Sec- retaries of State, or to the other administrative depart- STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 97 merits. Its duties are, therefore, of a somewhat mis- cellaneous character." ^ These observations apply with equal force to our Department of the Interior. In France ministerial portfolios are created by execu- tive decree and from time to time their number has varied. In 1875 there were nine, in 1879 there were ten, in 1887 there were eleven, and to-day there are twelve. In the order in which these rank, they are as follows: (1) Interior; (2) Finance; (3) War; (4) Justice and Pub- lic Worship; (5) Marine; (6) Colonies; (7) Pubhc In- struction; (8) Foreign Affairs; (9) Commerce; (10) Agriculture; (11) Public Works and Posts, Telegraphs and Telephones; and (12) Labor. There are seven ex- ecutive departments in the Government of Switzerland: (1) Foreign Affairs; (2) Interior; (3) Justice and PoUce; (4) Military Affairs; (5) Imposts and Finance; (6) Posts and Railways; (7) Commerce, Industry and Agricul- ture. ^ There are to-day in the United States ten execu- tive departments: (1) State; (2) Treasury; (3) War; (4) Justice; (5) Post-Office; (6) Navy; (7) Interior; (8) Agriculture; (9) Commerce; and (10) Labor. It is im- possible to make an accurate comparison of the divi- sion of the executive departments in these three Repub- lics, since each has peculiar and individual necessities which require different methods of treatment. The ex- ecutive departments, however, correspond in a gen- eral way. Our Department of State, which is really a Department of Foreign Affairs, is the equivalent of 1 A. Lawrence Lowell, The Government of England, vol. I, p. 105. 2 Frederic Austin Ogg, The Governments of Europe, pp. 312, 424. 98 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE departments in France and Switzerland. Our Depart- ment of the Treasury, in France goes under the name of "Finance," and in Switzerland, "Imposts and Fi- nance." Our Department of War, in France bears the same name, while in Switzerland it is called, "Military- Affairs." Our Department of Justice parallels "Justice and Public Worship" in France and "Justice and Po- lice" in Switzerland. In France, the Department of Public Works and Posts, Telegraph and Telephone deals with a greater variety of matters than our Post- Office, as also does the Swiss Department of Posts and Railroads. Switzerland, having no means of naviga- tion, has no such department as our Navy Department and the French Ministry of Marine. Each of the three Republics has an Interior Department, but these de- partments deal with rather different matters. Exclu- sive of these Interior Departments or Ministries, we have noted six departments or ministries in France and five in Switzerland. In addition to the Interior Depart- ment, the United States has the three additional De- partments of Agriculture, of Commerce, and of Labor. In addition to the Interior Department, France has the five additional Departments of Agriculture, of Com- merce, of Labor, of Colonies, and of Public Instruction. Of these five departments, the first three parallel our departments of similar names. We have colonies, but no separate Department of Colonies, such matters com- ing under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of War. We have a Bureau of Education in the Interior Depart- ment, but no Ministry or Department of Public Wor- STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 99 ship. Besides the Interior Department and the other five enumerated departments, Switzerland has one more, the Department of Commercial Industry and Agriculture. It will be seen that the executive depart- ments of the three Republics deal with practically the same matters, and the matters dealt with by the Execu- tive and the names applied to the departments, in most governments, are practically the same. In 1849, the United States had but six departments. State or For- eign Affairs, Treasury, War, Navy, Justice, and Post- OfRce. Each of these departments dealt primarily with the matters indicated by its name, but each depart- ment had charge of other executive matters of the Gov- ernment. In 1849 the Interior Department was cre- ated to take care of the miscellaneous matters which did not properly belong to Foreign Affairs, Finance, Military Affairs, Justice, or Posts. Since the creation of the Department of the Interior, there have been created the Departments of Agriculture, of Commerce, and of Labor; but when we take up these departments, it will be seen that these three, together with the Department of the Interior, all deal with home affairs other than those dealt with specifically by the departments in exist- ence in 1849, and that the last four departments cre- ated in the Federal Executive deal with home affairs which are parceled out among these departments in no very scientific or orderly manner. The Departments of Agriculture, of Commerce, and of Labor, in the main exercise functions which were given to the Depart- ment of the Interior when it was created, and it will 100 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE be interesting to consider, a little more fully than we have previously done, the creation of the Department of the Interior. Soon after the close of the Mexican War, and as an outcome of the accession of territory resulting from that war, as well as of the great increase in population, wealth, and business throughout the country, a move- ment was started having in view the estabhshment of a new executive department, to be known as the " Home Department," which should take over the various bu- reaus and offices transacting public business relating to domestic affairs, such as patents, pensions, Indian affairs, and the Census. At that time the work pertain- ing to these offices was distributed among various de- partments: The Patent Office was under the supervi- sion of the Secretary of State; the Land Office and the Census were under the Secretary of the Treasury; In- dian affairs were controlled by the Secretary of War; and pensions were granted under the supervision of the Secretaries of War and the Navy. In his annual report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1848, R. J. Walker, the Secretary of the Treasury, in- vited attention to the enormous amount of work de- volved upon the head of that department, and the di- verse nature of the duties performed by him, some of which had no connection with commerce or the public finances. He also pointed out that the State Depart- ment had no proper connection with the work of the Patent Office, and that Indian affairs and applications for pensions could be better handled elsewhere than in STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 101 the War and Navy Departments. He accordingly re- commended that a new department be established, and that all the offices above named be placed under such new department. The matter was subsequently taken up by Congress; and on February 12, 1849, the Committee on Agricul- ture of the House submitted a report endorsing the views of the Secretary of the Treasury, together with a bill for the creation of a new department, to be known as the "Home Department," or "Department of the In- terior." The committee stated that the immediate considera- tions which urged the establishment of the new depart- ment were the mischiefs, losses, and dangers resulting from the existing irrational and ruinous distribution of executive powers and duties. They added, however, that there were broader considerations of public policy dictating the creation of such a department. Since the establishment of the Federal Government sixty years before, they said, some $700,000,000 had been expended for purposes of military aggression or defense; and the average expenditure for the War and Navy Depart- ments was then twelve or fourteen millions of dollars. The whole amount of expenditure during the same period for the promotion of the arts of peace, the development of agriculture and of the mechanical sci- ences, and for the facilitation of internal intercourse and trade, the support of education and the diffusion of knowledge, did not exceed one million dollars. The report continued: "The general fact remains unaf- 102 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE fected, that war and preparations for war have been practically regarded as the chief duty and end of this Government, while the arts of peace and production, whereby nations are subsisted, civilization advanced, and happiness secured, have been esteemed unworthy the attention, or foreign to the objects, of this Gov- ernment. It seems to us that this should not always continue, but that we should, as a wise people, reor- ganize the Government, so far as to fulfill these duties also, which are suggested by the nature, aspiration, and wants of our race, as psychic, moral, and intel- lectual beings; that it should do something towards protecting the people against those internal enemies, ignorance, destitution, and vice, as well as against those foreign foes who may invade, or who it is apprehended may assail us." In pursuance of the foregoing recom- mendation. Congress passed the act approved March 3, 1849,1 entitled "An Act to estabhsh the Home De- partment," which I have discussed in Chapter III. To-day the Department of the Interior deals with five totally different classes of matters. The General Land Office, Reclamation Service, Geological Survey, and Bureau of Mines all relate to the public lands of the United States and would seem to be very properly in a department called the "Interior." The other things dealt with by the department are education, Indian affairs, patents, and pensions. When we examine the Department of Agriculture, we shall find that, in addition to the bureaus that deal with purely agricul- » 9 U.S. Stat. L. 395. STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 103 tural matters, there is an office of Public Roads, whose duty it is to study road-building in connection with state highway officials and to conduct a one-year post- graduate course in highway engineering. This office has no more to do with agriculture than it has with labor, and it would seem properly to belong in the Bu- reau of Education, which, until a Department of Edu- cation is created, is in the Interior Department. There is also in the Department of Agriculture the Forest Service, and it would seem that this service has more to do with the lands held by the United States than it has to do with agriculture and so should belong in the Interior Department. The Forest Service has also an educational side which would seem to furnish an addi- tional reason for its being placed in the Interior Depart- ment, which conducts the Bureau of Education. When we examine the Department of Commerce we shall see that, in addition to its functions as to matters relating primarily to commerce, under it the Bureau of the Cen- sus is a subdivision. Theoretically it would seem that the Bureau of the Census deals primarily with the personnel of American citizens and that the Census might just as well be in the Department of the Interior or in the Department of Labor. The Department of the Interior was created to attend to the miscellaneous home affairs of the United States. There was no partic- ular theory of the separation of executive functions con- sidered when it was created, nor have such principles been considered in the creation of the subsequent De- partments of Agriculture, of Commerce, and of Labor. 104 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE The Department of the Interior grew too large and part of it was broken off to form the Department of Agri- culture. It continued to grow and the Department of Commerce and Labor was created. Labor insisted on recognition in a department of its own and the Depart- ment of Labor was created. When the next executive department of the Government is created, the Depart- ments of the Interior, of Agriculture, of Commerce, and of Labor should all be reorganized and the former Departments of State, Treasury, and War should be stripped of the matters which do not properly belong to them. The Department of Justice as at present organ- ized deals solely with matters properly in the law de- partment of the Government. A statement of the functions of the Department of the Interior must be either a brief description of its duties as to public lands, education, Indian affairs, patents, and pensions, or it must be a very detailed description of these entirely diverse matters. Any full consideration of the history of the dealings of the na- tion with the Indians, or any full description of the pub- lic lands held at present by the United States, or any technical discussion of patents is entirely without the scope of this book. The Department of the Interior to- day conducts its work through the General Land Office, the Indian Office, the Bureau of Pensions, the Patent Office, the Bureau of Education, the Geological Sur- vey, the Reclamation Service, and the Bureau of Mines. Before briefly considering the matters performed by these subdivisions of the department, it will be of inter- STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 105 est to note that the Department of Labor had its origin in the Bureau of Labor created in the Department of the Interior in 1884, and that there was once under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior a Commis- sioner of Railroads. The Interstate Commerce Com- mission was formerly also under his supervision, and the Secretary of the Interior once also had charge of the suppression of the slave trade. The department was created to handle all existing miscellaneous home affairs. The policy of the new department was in harmony with the purpose of Congress in creating it, and in the very first annual report of the Secretary of the Interior, Thomas Ewing, of Ohio, submitted to the President, December 3, 1849, a recommendation for the organiza- tion of a separate Bureau of Agriculture, which should carry out, on an enlarged and systematic scale, the work hitherto performed by an agricultural division in the Patent Office. The Secretary also urged in this report the construction of a highway or a railroad to the Pacific Ocean. A Bureau of Agriculture was estab- lished, but it grew later into the Department of Agri- culture. The work of the Department of the Interior in regard to railroads, however, deserves more than passing mention. By the original act incorporating the Union Pacific Railroad Company, approved July 1, 1862,^ the Sec- retary of the Interior was authorized to nominate five of the incorporators; and the company was required to 1 12 U.S. Stat. L. 489. 106 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE file its acceptance of the conditions of the act in the Interior Department. Various other duties with respect to the Pacific Railroads were imposed upon the Sec- retary from time to time; and he was, generally speak- ing, made the medium of carrying out the policy of the President with regard to such roads, with the excep- tion, of course, of duties pertaining to the indebtedness of the roads to the United States, which were per- formed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Federal Executive, through the Interior Depart- ment, exercised very important functions in reference to the building of the great transcontinental railroads. At the present time, however, the Department of the Interior has nothing to do with these roads. I shall later consider the possibility of future executive super- vision of the railways of the nation. To encourage the building of these roads, the United States granted to the railroads enormous tracts of its public lands, and to-day the Department of the Interior, through the General Land Office, has charge of all that remains of the enormous territory that originally belonged to the Federal Government. As I have already stated, the present functions of the Department of the Interior have to do with lands, education, Indians, pensions, and patents. Let us first consider the functions of the department in reference to the government lands. The four subdivisions of the department, the General Land Office, the Reclamation Service, the Geological Survey, and the Bureau of Mines, all deal with these functions, and we shall con- STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 107 sider them together, although they are not grouped together in the official list of the subdivisions of the department. The General Land Office was organized as a Bureau of the Treasury Department under Act of May 25, 1812, ^ and became a Bureau of the Interior Department when the latter was created. The Geolog- ical Survey was organized as a Bureau of the Interior Department under Act of March 3, 1879, ^ while the Reclamation Service was not provided for until June 17, 1902.^ The Bureau of Mines was provided for May 16, 1910.^ The General Land Office is in charge of a commissioner, while the Geological Survey and the Reclamation Commission and the Bureau of Mines are in charge of directors. Each of these four divisions of the Interior Department has its separate organiza- tion and is only under the general direction of the Sec- retary of the Interior. The General Land Office not only has its own chief clerk, but has its own corps of law clerks and examiners, and is itself divided into twelve divisions, each of which is in charge of a chief of division. So, too, the Geological Survey has its own chief clerk and its various administrative branches. The Reclamation Service has its own chief clerk, chief engineer, and chief counsel as well as a corps of assist- ants, while the Bureau of Mines is divided into eleven sections, each in charge of a chief of section. One of these sections is the legal department. The General Land Office has entire charge of the survey, management, 1 2 U.S. Stat. L. 716. 2 20 U.S. Stat. L. 394. » 32 U.S. Stat. L. 388. ^ 38 U.S. Stat. L. 369. 108 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE and disposition of public lands, with all the various matters relating to them, such as the adjudication of conflicting claims, the issuance of patents for lands, granting of railroad rights of way, and other easements; the Geological Survey is charged with classification of the public lands and the examination of the geological structures, mineral resources, and mineral products of the national domain. It has been and still is engaged in making a geological map of the United States involv- ing both topographic and geologic surveys, and every year it collects its statistics of mineral productions and makes investigations as to surface and underground waters. The Reclamation Service is charged with the survey, construction, and operation of the irrigation works in arid States, while the Bureau of Mines inves- tigates methods of mining, the treatment of ores, the use of explosives, and other matters relating to mining. The bureau also tests and analyzes coals, ores, and other mineral fuel substances for the use of the United States. One of the most important duties of the bureau is in relation to the safety of miners, appliances for the pre- vention of accidents, and improvements of conditions under which mining operations are carried on. In this last function, the Department of the Interior through the Bureau of Mines touches very closely the sort of work one would expect to be done by the Department of Labor. Since the Government was founded, about 1,835,- 000,000 acres of land have come into the control of the United States, and all of this has been disposed of in STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 109 various ways except about 700,000,000 acres. ^ By the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, the territory from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains became part of the United States, and all but a very small portion of this territory became the absolute property of the Government. The Oregon Territory and the purchase of Florida also brought to the United States added land assets. The public domain was further augmented as a result of the Mexican War, and the purchase of Alaska in 1867 brought another enormous and valuable terri- tory into the possession of the Government. The greater part of the pubHc domain of which the Government has disposed has been sold to individual settlers at low rates for the purpose of developing the country. Large grants have been made to various of the States for educational purposes and for internal improvements. Ten million acres were given to the States for agricultural college properties in 1862, and since 1860 such great trans- continental railroads as the Northern Pacific, Union Pacific, and Central Pacific were granted large tracts of land as an aid to the building of these railroads. The Government is still disposing of land under the law which provides for homestead entries by actual settlers. The report of the Secretary of the Interior shows that the total cash receipts from sales of public land for the fiscal year 1914 were $4,256,102.96. Oil lands, coal lands, forest lands, water rights, timber lands, all give rise to most important questions concerning the proper administration of the public domain, and the Secretary ^ Frederic J. Haskin, The American Government, p. 79. 110 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE of the Interior in his report for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1914, says, "Contrary to the general belief, the business of the Land Department is increasing, al- though the monies received from pubHc land sources are decreasing." By the Act of March 1, 1872, Congress inaugurated the policy of setting aside tracts of land as national parks. The Yellowstone National Park was the first of these national reserves. Since the creation of the Yellowstone Park, eleven different parks in various parts of the country have been created. Alaska, rich in mineral and other resources, presents at the present time most important questions for solution by the De- partment of the Interior. There has been no railroad construction in Alaska for a number of years, and on March 12, 1914, Congress passed a law providing for the construction of a system of railroads into the interior of Alaska. The handling of the public lands of the Gov- ernment is a matter to which the general public has given but little consideration, and it is only in recent years that a realization of the enormous assets still pos- sessed by the Government has been brought home to the American people. The Patent Office, Bureau of Education, Office of Indian Affairs, and Bureau of Pensions remain to be considered. Article I, section 8, of the Constitution gave to Congress the power to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their re- spective writings and discoveries. In the beginning of the Government, patents were granted by a board, of STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 111 which the Secretary of War and the Attorney-General were members, and later the granting of patents de- volved upon the Secretary of State and the Attorney- General. In 1836 a Bureau of the State Department was established having entire charge of patents, and on the creation of the Department of the Interior, in 1849, the Patent Office was transferred to it. Patents are granted to the original inventor and secure to him the exclusive right to his invention for a term of years. The Patent Office is in charge of the Commissioner of Pat- ents and two assistant commissioners. It employs an enormous force of examiners and clerks and occupies the whole of a huge building for its purposes. The work of the office is highly technical, and the "Congressional Directory" for December, 1914, gives a list of forty- four principal examiners having charge of applications for patents relating to acoustics, artesian wells, buckles, buttons, buildings, hardware, carriages, chemistry, elec- tricity, and a long list including all matters in which any one could possibly claim an invention. It is stated that the civilized nations of the earth have issued three million patents, and that more than one milHon of these have been issued by the American Patent Office. The present Patent Office Building, although it occupies several square city blocks in Washington, is totally in- adequate for its purposes, and the work of this office is in a marked degree indicative of the mechanical and industrial achievements of the American people. Dur- ing the fiscal year ending June 30, 1914, the total num- ber of applications for patents was 81,539, the greatest 112 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE number received during any year in the history of the Patent Office. The total receipts of the office for that year were $2,069,988.95. ^ One sometimes finds a great deal of unintentional humor in the official reports and directories of the Gov- ernment. The official duties of the Commissioner of Education, as set forth in the "Congressional Direc- tory" of December, 1914, are as follows: "The Com- missioner of Education collects statistics and general information showing the condition and progress of edu- cation, issues an annual report in two volumes, a bulle- tin in several numbers annually, and miscellaneous publications; has charge of the schools for the educa- tion of native children in Alaska, supervises the rein- deer industry in Alaska, and administers the endow- ment fund for the support of colleges for the benefit of agriculture and mechanic arts." ^ Professor Fairlie says, "The bureau has collected one of the most valu- able pedagogical libraries in the world and has been called a sort of educational clearing-house." ^ The issu- ing of an annual report in two volumes, a bulletin in several numbers, and the supervision of the reindeer industry in Alaska by no means give an adequate under- standing of the important work rendered by the Com- missioner of Education. Although the National Gov- ernment under the Constitution is not authorized to 1 Report of the Secretary of the Interior for 191^, p. 52. 2 Congressional Directory, December 14, 1914. ^ John A. Fairlie, The National Administration of the United States, p. 214. STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 113 establish a general system of education, it takes a most important part in educational matters throughout the country, and there are numerous educational activities of the Government which should be brought under the direction of the Commissioner. During the year 1914 the bureau through its specialists studied such impor- tant matters as recent developments in English uni- versities, preparation of teachers in secondary schools in Germany, France, and Great Britain, and exercised a most salutary influence throughout the country. Representatives of the bureau inspected thirty-five American colleges and universities, attended fifteen con- ferences on higher education in different parts of the country, worked out plans for the tabulation of college curricula, and otherwise promoted education. All of this in addition to conducting the Alaska reindeer serv- ice! As a part of his report on the Bureau of Education, the Secretary of the Interior states: " On June 30, 1913, there were in Alaska 47,266 reindeer distributed among sixty-two herds. The increase for the year was twenty- three per cent, notwithstanding the fact that nearly five thousand reindeer were killed for their meat and skin. The total income of the natives from the reindeer industry during the year, exclusive of meat and hides used for the natives themselves, was $66,966.00." ^ Upon reading this, I wrote to the Secretary of the Interior as follows: "I am working on a little book on the executive departments, and I am venturing to ask 1 Report of the Secretary of the Interior for 19H, p. 56. 114 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE you if you could advise me how it happens that the Bureau of Education has charge of the Alaska reindeer service. Such duties seem to me quite foreign to the bureau, and as illustrative of the heterogeneous func- tions of the Department of the Interior. There may, however, be some reason for the association of the rein- deer service with the Department of Education. If there is, I should be greatly obliged for information on this subject." I very promptly received the following explanation from the Chief of the Alaska Division: — "The Alaska reindeer service is an integral part of the educational system of the Bureau of Education for northern and western Alaska. The district superin- tendents of schools are also the superintendents of the reindeer service; the teachers in charge of the United States public schools in the regions affected by the rein- deer industry are ex-ofido local superintendents of the reindeer herds in the vicinity of their schools. The reindeer service is a system of industrial education of the most practical kind, which, in the course of a sin- gle generation, has elevated the Eskimos in the coastal regions of western Alaska, from Point Barrow to the Pacific Ocean, from nomadic hunters and fishermen, eking out a precarious existence upon fish and game, to civilized, thrifty people having in their herds assured support for themselves and opportunity to acquire wealth by the sale of meat and skins to the white men in those regions." The Constitution (article I, section 8) provides that STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 115 Congress shall have power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes. The Constitution makes no further reference to the Indians. Washington delivered his first inaugural address in the City of New York on April 30, 1789. Among the first, if not actually the first of the special messages he sent to the Senate referred to Indian treaties. On May 25, 1789, he communicated with the Senate as follows: "Gentlemen of the Senate, In pursuance of the order of the late Congress, treaties between the United States and civilized nations of In- dians having been negotiated and signed, these treaties, with sundry papers respecting them, I now lay before you for your consideration and advice, by the hands of General Knox, under whose official superintendence the business was transacted and who will be ready to communicate to you any information on such points as may appear to require it." ^ General Knox had served throughout the Revolutionary War, was an offi- cer of the Society of the Cincinnati, and at that time was the Secretary of War, and, although the only refer- ence in the Constitution to Indians referred to the regu- lation of commerce with the Indian tribes, for nearly fifty years after Washington's inauguration, Indian affairs were of necessity administered by the military authorities. In 1832 the office of Commissioner of In- dian affairs was created in the War Department to deal with the Government's peaceful relations with the In- dians; but until the creation of the Department of the ^ Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol. i, p. 57. 116 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE Interior and the transfer to it of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the relations of the Government to the Indians were far from peaceful. There have been a number of interesting books written on the subject of the Ameri- can Indian and something has been written concerning the relation of the Government to the Indian; but at the present time the Indian problem, although differ- ing entirely from what it was at the institution of the Government, is one of the most interesting and impor- tant questions before the Federal Government, and the subject of the relation of the Government to the Indians, together with the history of the Indians in this coun- try, furnishes a most inviting field for research and a most profitable region of investigation for the student of history and government. There is an opportunity for a most valuable work on this subject. On the 1st of July, 1914, the Cherokee Nation ceased to exist. Its Senate and House, governor and officers, laws and property have disappeared. The members of the Na- tion became American citizens, and if the Government at the present time has any well-defined policy as to the Indians, it is to break up the tribal government and fit them for individual citizenship as soon as possible. I cannot here go into the history of the Indian or his relation to the Government. The relations of the Gov- ernment with the Indians are among the most important matters with which the Interior Department has to deal, and the Interior Department at the present time is the most interesting department of the Executive by reason of the importance and novelty of the problems which STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 117 confront it. The Census of 1860 showed 254,300 In- dians in the United States. The Census of 1910 shows an Indian population of 304,950. These Indians mostly- live on government reservations which Secretary of the Interior Lane aptly designates as "little more than ex- panded and perhaps somewhat idealized orphan asy- lums." The importance of the present Indian problem may be seen from the fact that at present they have lands aggregating 109,150 square miles, or territory equal to that of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Kentucky, and Virginia. The Department of the Interior estimates these hold- ings to be worth $600,000,000. Over two thirds of this land is now held as individual farms, the unallotted or tribal lands being estimated as worth less than $200,- 000,000. The "Report of the Secretary of the Interior for 1914" says: "If the oil and coal and timber lands belonging to the Indians were appraised at their full value, and if to this the value of their yieldings and personal property were added, it is estimated that the Indians would be found to have a wealth approximat- ing $900,000,000." In other words, each Indian in the United States is at the present time worth on an aver- age $3000. In addition to these possessions, the Treas- ury of the United States has tribal funds approximat- ing $50,000,000, while in the banks throughout the nation, the Government has deposited to the credit of individual Indians under its control something over $18,000,000. The Secretary of the Interior considers the Osage Indians as the wealthiest people in the world, 118 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE and the department estimates the average wealth of the Osage Indians at $9579.85. With their land-hold- ings and oil and gas royalties, for an average family of four the Osages have an annual income of approxi- mately $2700, in addition to their income from lands, and some families have an income of $12,000 a year.^ A Bureau of Pensions was originally under the direc- tion of the War Department, ^ and logically it might just as well still be under the direction of the War De- partment as a part of the Department of the Interior. In his first annual address to Congress, on January 8, 1790, Washington said: "A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manu- factories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military supplies." ^ I have already quoted President Taft as stating, as his opin- ion, that the present pensions are largely due to our not having an adequate army ready in the past. The Secretary of the Interior reported to the President that during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1914, the total expenditures for pensions had been reduced from $174,- 171,660.80 in the preceding year to $172,417,546.26.'^ At the end of this fiscal year there were on the pension roll 785,239 names, a net loss of 35,033 from the total of 820,272 on the roll at the beginning of the year; the 1 Report of the Secretary of the Interior for 191 If, p. 3. 2 Act of March 2, 1833, 4 U.S. Stat. L. 622. 2 Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol. I, p. 65. ^ Report of the Secretary of the Interior for 191 It, p. 19. STATE, TREASURY, INTERIOR 119 decrease of pensioners for the preceding year was 40,094. The actual number of soldiers pensioned for the Revo- lutionary War was 52,504. The last pensioned soldier of this war died in 1869 and the last pensioned widow died in 1906. For the War of 1812, the total number of pension certificates issued was about 67,000 and the last surviving pensioned soldier of this war died in 1905. "^ Since the institution of the Government, it is estimated that about $4,680,000,000 has been paid for pensions, and that of this amount all except about $163,- 000,000 has been paid on account of Civil War pensions. The Bureau of Pensions occupies a huge building de- voted exclusively to its purposes in Judiciary Square in Washington. On the outside of this building is a deco- rative frieze under the eaves running all about the building, and upon this frieze, in plaster, a long line of troops is ever silently tramping. The Civil War was fought for the preservation of the Union. Whatever may be one's views as to the amount and kind of pen- sions paid, whether one regards this fabulous annual expenditure as partly a reward for service and partly as a penalty for unpreparedness, or whatever view the American citizen may take of these pensions, this greatest item of annual expense to the Government should cause every citizen of this great nation to ask himself the question, whether in the words of Wash- ington a free people ought not to be "armed and dis- ciplined." The history of the Department of the In- terior and of the matters now under its supervision ^ Report of the Secretary of the Interior for 19H, pp. 48-51. 120 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE gives one the best idea of the miraculous development of this nation, of its enormous present resources, and even in the mind of the most unimaginative should awake visions as to the future of this Union. The Civil War was fought for the preservation of the Union. The constitutional questions arising from that war are set- tled once and for all. The Department of the Interior deals with the greatest material resources of the nation. Through the Bureau of Pensions it makes the greatest single item of national expenditure, and it performs some of the most important functions of the Federal Executive in securing to the people of these United States the "more perfect Union" sought by the Consti- tution. Note. — Because of the European War, oertain temporary changes have been made. Third Assistant Secretary of State Phillips advises me that a separate Mexican Division was created July 28, 1915, not in the nature of a permanent division, but to meet the exigencies of the present situation. A Bureau of War Risk Insurance in the Treasury Department has also been created. Its purpose, states Assistant Secretary Peters, is to offer to American vessels and cargoes the facilities for war risk insurance provided by English and continental governments after the out- break of the war. CHAPTER VIII FUNCTIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS IN "insuring DOMESTIC TRANQUILLITY" THE DEPARTMENTS OF WAR, THE NAVY, AND JUSTICE The Constitution of the United States (article II, clause 2) says that the President shall be the Com- mander-in-chief of the army and navy. The Secretary of War, the third ranking member of the Cabinet, is the executive officer through whom the President exercises these functions on land in peace and in war, but the War Department has important administrative duties con- cerning the Government of the United States other than the national defense. Expenditures of the department show its various functions. For the fiscal year 1913 the estimated disbursements for the War Department were $158,000,000. (This did not include $165,000,000 for pensions for the Civil and other wars.) For the year July 1, 1911, to June 30, 1912, of the total disbursement of $147,000,000, the appropriations amounted to about $2,000,000 for the maintenance of the civil establishment of the War Department, including such matters as the salaries in the office of the Secretary of War and other officials in Washington and the current expenses of the depart- ment. There was appropriated about $91,500,000 for the support of the army proper, a little over $1,000,000 for the Military Academy at West Point, and nearly 122 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE $4,000,000 for the support of the organized militia. Of the above $147,000,000 for the War Department in 1912, $40,000,000 was appropriated for various public works of the United States. Of this amount over $6,- 000,000 was for fortifications, arsenals, and military- posts, while the balance was chiefly appropriated for work upon the rivers and harbors of the United States under the direction of the War Department. There were also over $8,000,000 of insular appropriations, and so, out of the total $147,000,000 appropriated for the year ending 1912, it will be seen that a considerable part was expended for non-military purposes. ^ But the purely military expenditures of the United States Government amounted to a very large sum, and mat- ters relating to the military forces of the Government are the chief concern of the War Department, although the duties of the Secretary of War include most impor- tant domestic matters and the entire supervision of the insular possessions of the United States. We will con- sider the general functions of the department and its general organization, before discussing its purely war duties. The work of the department can be divided into four classes: The army, including the National Guard; the Engineering Department, supervising river and harbor improvements throughout the United States; the Pan- ama Canal; the general supervision of the Philippine Islands, Porto Rico, and other insular possessions. The Secretary of War, as head of the department, is charged 1 Annual Report of the Secretary of War for 1912. WAR, NAVY, JUSTICE 123 with the supervision of all things relating to the above matters, and in his duties he is aided by one Assistant Secretary of War, who is authorized to decide all cases except those involving "questions of policy, the estab- lishment or reversal of precedents, or matters of special or extraordinary importance." The Assistant Secretary has particular charge of all matters relating to the militia. The construction of the Panama Canal, under the direction of the War Depart- ment, was successfully carried to a termination under the direction of officers of the army. The importance of the Panama Canal is impossible of estimation. Its opening will create a new epoch in the history of the world, but its construction contains for us nothing of interest in connection with the executive departments of the Government, except that the efficiency of the present Panama Canal Commission is a most favorable comment upon the character and ability of American army officers and the work of the War Department, and that to-day the Chief of Staff says we have no ade- quate army to defend it. The Philippine Islands are at present governed by the Commission to the Philippine Islands, with a President and Governor-General and the local legislature. The affairs of the Philippine Is- lands and of Porto Rico are under the general supervi- sion of the Bureau of Insular Affairs of the War Depart- ment. The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors in the War Department has charge of numerous internal improvements in the United States. The actual amount expended under the direction of the Chief of Engineers 124 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE in connection with the improvements of rivers and harbors during the year ending June 30, 1912, was $35,719,403.62, and its work included such matters as the construction of the Troy Dam, in the State of New York, in the Hudson River, for the improvement of the waterways in connection with the reconstruction of the Erie Canal. The river and harbor work of the department is of the very greatest importance to the United States and constitutes one of its largest annual expenditures. The foregoing are the non-military duties of the War Department. Our military affairs are directed through various bodies in the department. At the head of them is the General Staff Corps, which is the general direct- ing power of the army. The General Staff Corps was organized under the provisions of the Act of Congress, approved February 14, 1903. It is the directing brains of the army. It is its duty to prepare plans for the na- tional defense and for the mobilization of the military forces in time of war; and to study and report upon all questions affecting the efficiency of the army. At the head of the General Staff is the Chief of Staff, who is practically the commanding general of the army, al- though in time of peace we have no such offiicer. He has supervision of all troops and of all the other de- partments which exist for the administration of army affairs. The office of the Chief of Staff is the supervising military bureau of the War Department. The other bureaus and divisions of the department relating to military affairs are the Division of Militia Affairs and the various military bureaus. WAR, NAVY, JUSTICE 125 The Division of Militia Affairs, which is especially under the direction of the Assistant Secretary of War, has charge of all matters relating to the National Guard of the various States, including such matters as arma- ment, equipment, discipline, training, education, and organization. The United States has in recent years assumed the direction of the militia, and since the Span- ish War has brought the various state organizations to a much higher state of efficiency. Every summer there are conducted camps of instruction in which the militia and regular army usually participate, and it has been the policy of the Government more and more to make the militia a first line of support for the army in time of war.^ Of the various military bureaus, it is unnecessary to ^ Experts agree that the state militia is not the most effective support for the army. Until something better is provided it is all we have. Universal, obligatory military service, somewhat after the Swiss system, seems to be the only adequate solution of our needs, and the chief argument in favor of the "Continental Army" plan is that it is a step toward universal service as an adequate protection for the Federal Government. Mr. Henry Breckinridge, Assistant Secretary of War, has furnished me with the following official explanation of the Continental Army: "The Continental Army, so-called, is the supplement or reserve of the Regular Army. It will consist of 400,000 men that are organized, equipped, officered, and subject to instant call. It will be raised by annual increments of 133,000 men, — each man to serve with the colors three years, — so that after the first three years, it will always have 400,000 men in it with the colors." In reference to the recruiting of the Conti- nental Army, Secretary Garrison says, "Taking the four hundred congressional districts of the country, it would require three hun- dred and thirty-three each year from each one." At the present time, however, the Continental Army is only a plan and not a part of our national defenses. 126 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE do more than mention their names. There is the Office of the Adjutant-General, which has charge of the issu- ing of orders, and the Office of the Inspector-General, which has charge of the examination of the condition of troops and military posts. The Office of the Judge- Advocate-General deals with matters of discipline and is the law department of the army, as the Office of the Surgeon-General deals with the physical welfare of the troops. The remaining office of importance, that of the Quartermaster-General, is one that has charge of the payment, feeding, clothing, and transportation. The present Quartermaster Corps is a consolidation of the Office of the Quartermaster-General, the Commis- sary-General, and the Paymaster-General of the army, provided by Act of Congress, August 24, 1912. Such are the general functions of the department, viewed as a branch of the Federal Executive. The power of the department, except as it directs our colonial affairs, and the matter of rivers and harbors, has in- creased little since its creation. The War Department has not developed in any such way as has the Depart- ment of Justice, and there is no arm of the Executive that to-day requires serious consideration more than the War Department. The United States spends more money on its army than any other nation in respect to what it has to show for it. President Taft, writing in 1913, said: "So far as our military policy is concerned, it would seem as if the maxim that 'the Lord looks after children and drunken men' ought to be extended to the United States, for by hook or crook, through mistakes WAR, NAVY, JUSTICE 127 of the enemy, or through luck and by the expenditure of far greater treasure and many more Hves than were necessary, we have generally been successful." ^ He also writes: "I have not the comparative figures for the cost of the European armies and our own this year, but in 1906 this statement which I made as Secretary of War was true: 'Our regular army to-day amounts in effec- tive force to about 60,000 men, and it costs us in round numbers about $72,000,000 to sustain our miUtary es- tablishment. France maintains an army on the active list of 546,000 men, and it costs her $133,000,000. Ger- many maintains an army which has upon its active list 640,000 men, and it costs her $144,000,000 a year to maintain it. In other words, France has an army about nine times the size of ours which it costs her substan- tially less than twice the sum to maintain, while Ger- many has an army more than ten times as large which it costs her just about double our sum to maintain.' " ^ It is absurd for a nation possessing the vast wealth of the United States to allow itself to be so inadequately protected. December 5, 1779, Charles Carroll of Carroll- ton, wrote to Benjamin Frankhn: "We have a good, though not a numerous army, about 20,000 fine hardy fellows, as tough as the knots of an old seasoned oak, well disciplined, well armed, and pretty well clothed, commanded by a man whom they reverence and love." ^ It is interesting to compare this description of our army ^ Popular Government, p. 248. ^ Jiyid., p. 255. 3 Life and Correspondence of Charles Carroll of CarrolUon, vol. II, p. 30. 128 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE in 1779 with the above observations of President Taft, and especially with the report to the Secretary of War, of November 15, 1914, of the Chief of Staff, Major-Gen- eral W. W. Wotherspoon, According to this report, on November 15, 1914, the actual strength of the army, exclusive of the Philippine Scouts, was 4572 officers and 88,444 enlisted men. The authorized strength was 4726 officers and 95,977 enlisted men. The army, said Gen- eral Wotherspoon, was therefore 154 officers and 7533 enlisted men below its authorized strength. The Secre- tary of War, in December, 1912, stated that "outside of the regular army, the only force of men who have re- ceived any military training existing in the United States to-day is the National Guard." General Wotherspoon reported that on November 15, 1914, the total reported strength of the National Guard, or organized militia, was 8323 officers and 119,087 enlisted men. Of the reg- ular army the field or mobile force of our army was less than 52,000 enlisted men. Of the organized militia only 73.87 per cent of officers and men attended the annual camps of instruction. As to the organized militia, Gen- eral Wotherspoon said: " It must, however, be admitted, that unless there be a material change in the laws gov- erning the organized militia, which will bring about a greater reliance upon and an increased control by the General Government, that branch of our military es- tablishment cannot be regarded and depended upon as a refiable force." The report concludes that, "in look- ing over the strength of our garrisons in foreign pos- sessions, it becomes at once manifest that the garrisons WAR, NAVY, JUSTICE 129 we are maintaining there or propose to maintain there, under the scheme of distribution of our army as it ex- ists at present, are entirely inadequate for the need of those possessions." As to conditions at home, the then Chief of Staff said, "That we cannot, with our pres- ent strength, rapidly assemble a sufficient force, fully equipped for field operations, to meet such an expedition as might be dispatched against our shores, is evident." Worthy of serious consideration is the assertion: "That the great waterway of the Panama Canal cannot be protected against the operations of a first-class military power by the present or proposed garrison we contem- plate placing there, without the power and ability to reinforce it rapidly by troops from the United States, is equally manifest." i I have elsewhere compared our defenses with that of a first-class continental power, ^ and it is not the prov- ince of this little book to discuss army reform; but the department of the Executive, primarily meant to insure domestic tranquillity^ has not kept pace with the needs^^^ of the Government/ For the amount of money expended and for the proper protection of the United States our present military establishment is extremely inadequate. In his last report as Secretary of War, Mr. Stimson called attention to "the diffusion of the army and the lack of tactical organization, which results in our hav- ing what is virtually a number of scattered groups of constabulary rather than an integral organization and 1 " Autumn ManoBUvres of a German Army Corps," Infantry Journal, December, 1912. 130 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE which prevents the proper training and team work of the national army." The General Staff of the army, on August 12, 1912, made a report on "The Organization of the Land Forces of the United States." This document contained the broad outlines of a comprehensive military policy. Some of the reforms proposed can be carried out by executive action, but the greater part of these reforms must be provided by Congress. Treatment of the army itself in time of peace has varied under every Admin- istration, and almost uniformly Congress has opposed the recommendations of the Executive for reforms of the army. The existence of isolated and small frontier posts and garrisons throughout the United States has repeatedly been the subject of criticism by the Execu- tive, but so far Congressmen have been very loath to consent to the removal of any body of troops from cities in their districts, which profit by the presence of such troops. I i think if Is time that the people of the United States read and ponder General Wotherspoon's report and bear in mind the opinion of the most pacific of Presidents: " I am as strongly in favor as any one can be of prose- cuting every plan that will make war less and less prob- able. I believe there are practical plans that can ac- complish much in this direction. I do not believe the plan of common disarmament is a practical plan. It has been tried and has failed." ^ I am entirely of the opinion here expressed by President Taft and I also * Popular Government, p. 256. WAR, NAVY, JUSTICE 131 agree with his following conclusion: "The people of the United States, on the whole, are a shrewd, enter- prising, and provident people, but they have not proven it by their military policy." ^ A morning newspaper of to-day (February 19, 1915) lies on my table as I begin this chapter. Under large headlines I read this report: "London, Feb. 18. — The immediate effect of the German submarine blockade of the British Isles, beginning to-day, was to tie up all passenger traffic from England to Holland. The crews of one Danish and three Norwegian ships at Aarhus, Denmark, refused to-day to sail for England and left their ships. This action was announced by the Ex- change Telegraph Company's Copenhagen correspond- ent in a dispatch which reported that the Norwegian steamer Nordcap had struck a German mine in the Baltic Sea and foundered. All her crew perished." ^ President Lowell, of Harvard University, writing in November, 1908, says of the British Admiralty: "The system appears to be highly satisfactory, and in fact it is constantly held up as a model to the less fortunate 1 Popular Government, p. 247. 1 wrote this chapter in February, 1915. When I corrected the proof on February 4, 1916, 1 found no need for a revision. "Pre- paredness" was much discussed, and various plans were under consideration, but in regard to actual armaments the Federal Gov- ernment was in exactly the same position as it was a year before. I have elsewhere discussed the subject of "Preparedness." ("Policy and Armament," Baltimore American, January 25 and 28, February 1 and 5, 1916. These articles were written under the name of "X.") 2 The Sun, Baltimore, Friday morning, February 19, 1915, vol. CLVI, no. 82, p. 1. 132 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE chiefs of the army." ^ As I write, the whole fabric of the English Government is being tested. Built up through centuries of development by the employment of legal fictions, the English Government to-day has seemed to be one of the most effective Governments in existence, but from the point of view of American political science, there is little benefit to be derived from a comparison of our Federal Executive and the executive departments of the English Government. The principal divisions of the English executive departments are the Foreign Of- fice, Colonial Office, India Office, War Office, Home Office, the Treasury, the Post-Office, the "Law Offi- cers' Department," the Admiralty, the Board of Trade, the Local Government Board, the Board of Works, the Board of Agriculture, and the Board of Education. It is impossible here to go into the peculiarities of the Eng- lish Government, which are due to the necessity of plac- ing new wine in old bottles by attributing novel functions to ancient institutions. A familiar example of such fic- tions is that by which the Island of Ascension, instead of being under the direction of the Home Secretary as an island, is brought under the jurisdiction of the Admiralty upon the official announcement that the island is to be considered a vessel of war. The boards I have enu- merated, in the words of Mr. Lowell, "are legal phan- toms that provide imaginary colleagues for a single responsible Minister." ^ The English Government is, , 1 A. Lawrence Lowell, The Government of England, vol. I, p. 93. 8 Ibid., vol. I, p. 84. WAR, NAVY, JUSTICE 133 therefore, much more hke our Government than would appear from a superficial examination of the names of the executive departments, and each of these depart- ments is actually under the direction of a Minister who is more or less in the position of the head of one of our executive departments. The Admiralty, however, is one of the executive departments, and in fact the only one which is actually conducted by a board. This board consists of a First Lord, four Naval Lords, and a Civil Lord, together with the parliamentary and per- manent Secretaries.^ The First Lord is practically a Minister of Marine or Secretary of the Navy, assisted by an advisory council. The British Admiralty has many points in common with our Navy Department, in which our Secretary of the Navy corresponds to the English First Lord, while the chiefs of the various bureaus have duties quite similar to those of the remain- ing members of the Admiralty, with the marked differ- ence that none of our executive officers have seats in the legislative branch of the Government. As I have before pointed out, it is impossible to draw any very close analogy between our executive departments and those of foreign Governments, but a comparison is interesting. In 1798 the sea soldiers of the United States passed from the control of the War Department, and the newly created Secretary of the Navy assumed direction of the naval affairs of the nation. The War of 1812 was an overseas war, but had the army of the United States 1 Report of Commissioners on Administration of Naval and Mili^ tary Departments, Com, Papers (1890), xix, 1, pp. viii-ix. 134 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE been as efficient as its navy, the war might well have been settled on land, for England possessed in Canada vulnerable territory. The Civil War was a land war, but the navy rendered conspicuous service. In the problems of the national defense, or, as the Constitu- tion puts it, securing domestic tranquillity and pro- viding for the common defense, there should be no poli- tics. Whether our army and navy are adequate for these purposes is no more a question for a division of the citizens of the United States into the usual political parties than is the question of whether or not the New York police force furnishes adequate protection for life and property in that city. The "New Navy" dates from Secretary Whitney, 1885-89, and in the Spanish War, as well as in the previous wars, rendered conspicuously efficient service. The army of the United States has no logical territorial systems of garrisons and depots. Frontier posts of by- gone days still exist at the positions in which they were originally placed as necessities to Indian warfare, and remain at these locations in spite of the fact that the need which called for their original establishment has long since ceased to exist. From the points of view of discipline, mobility, and administration, the scattering of what land forces the United States possesses is very detrimental to the army. The location of navy-yards and depots has been frequently subjected to question, but the navy is not under the same disadvantage as the army in reference to the unsystematic location of garri- sons, for in the navy each fighting unit possesses in it- WAR, NAVY, JUSTICE 135 self the essentials of mobility and action. Unlike a regi- ment or greater fighting unit of the army, which, in a country like ours, must rely upon transportation by railroad or water, each ship of the navy individually possesses facilities of transportation, subsistence, and combat. The navy has been fortunate in another mat- ter of great importance. The majority of the members of most Congresses have considered themselves ex-offi- cio experts in army affairs, and the list of colonels of volunteers commissioned in the Spanish War would lead one to believe that the opinion is prevalent that any one can successfully command a regiment. Fortu- nately for the navy, a similar belief has not prevailed. The navy has not suffered to the same extent as has the army from unskilled civilian interference. President Lowell is authority for the statement that a similar condition has existed in England. To the Englishmen, however, he says, "the navy is a mystery which ordi- nary men do not pretend to understand, and with which they do not attempt to interfere; and this is a security for expert management." ^ The navy is admittedly a matter for experts. For its history and its uses one must look to the writings of such men as the late Admiral Mahan. For the study of the Federal Executive, the navy offers little material. I shall, therefore, attempt only a brief consideration of the navy as a force avail- able to the President in his capacity as commander-in- chief for insuring domestic tranquillity. The constructive genius of the American people has ^ A. Lawrence Lowell, The Government of England, vol. i, p. 102. 136 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE been much more alert to the needs of the navy than to the possession of a properly trained, equipped, and or- ganized defensive army. Until the termination of the present European conflict, all opinions as to the value of naval units must be held in abeyance, but it is stated that the American navy at the present time is in a commendable state of efficiency, whether or not it is adequate in size for the protection of the nation. It certainly possesses the best training school for officers that exists, and the character of the training accorded to the officers of the navy is vital to the efficiency of that branch of the service. Experts agree that our system of naval training for officers is better than that of England. English writers, especially after the Boer War, were united in their adverse criticism of English army training, but there has never been any serious criticism of the training afforded by West Point to what army officers the United States has graduated from that institution. The American people are as capable of organizing and training a sufficient force as are the people of any other nation, but they are not awake to the dangers that threaten our huge and inadequately protected borders. The Naval Academy at Annapolis was formally opened October 10, 1845. Its history ^ states that the Naval Academy at Annapolis owes its inception to the administrative ability of George Bancroft as Secre- tary of the Navy. "Less than eight months after as- 1 James Russell Soley, Historical Sketch of the United States Naval Academy, pp. 74-76. WAR, NAVY, JUSTICE 137 suming the duties of his office, Bancroft was enabled to present to the country a fully organized academy, in efficient working order, which was destined to do for the navy what West Point had so long done for the army. He had accomplished during a single recess of Congress what his predecessors had for thirty years in vain attempted to secure by legislation." Whatever matter fully commands the interest of the American people is apt to be well and satisfactorily accomplished. Unfortunately, very little public interest has been taken in the past in the study of governmental problems. When the proper use of experts in government is fully realized, and when a proper separation between political and purely expert officers in the Government is made, then and only then shall we begin to secure thoroughly efficient service in our cities, in our States, and in our federal service. I should be very glad to see the De- partment of Education in the Interior Department erected into a Department of Education whose head would rank with the other members of the President's Cabinet, and I should like to see, as one of the most important functions of this department, the establish- ment and maintenance of a training-school for public civil servants of the Government similar to West Point and Annapolis. Prior to the foundation of the Naval Academy, offi- cers mostly obtained their training from instruction given upon the individual ships of the navy. There is no comparison between the efficiency of the training thus afforded and the education that may be obtained 138 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE at the present Naval Academy. At the present time the civil employees of our diplomatic service, our consular service, and our various administrative branches of the Government are trained in a much less satisfactory way than were the officers of the navy prior to the foun- dation of the Naval Academy. We have learned from that experience the value of such a training-school. To-day our colleges are devoting an increasing amount of attention to instruction in government, and many courses are given with the avowed purpose of fitting students for government service. The furtherance of such education, however, would be greatly facilitated by the organization of a governmental school of admin- istration and public service. Washington was in favor of a National University. The whole basis of the gov- ernment of a free people is proper education. General collegiate or university education is not lacking in facili- ties in this country, but it is imperative that some method be devised by which trained men may be reared for the work of the federal executive administration. In reference to this, Secretary Bancroft's annual re- port of December 1, 1845, contains the following ac- count of the founding of the Naval Academy which merits consideration: "Congress, in its great desire to improve the navy, had permitted the department to employ professors and instructors at an annual cost of $28,200; and it had been used, besides the few employed at the receiving-ships and the Naval Asylum, to send professors with the midshipmen to every ocean and every clime. But the ship is not friendly to study, and WAR, NAVY, JUSTICE 139 the office of professor rapidly declined into a sinecure; often not so much was done as the elder officers would cheerfully do for their juniors. The teachers on board of the receiving-ship gave little instruction, or none whatever; so that the expenditure was fruitless of great results. Many of the professors were able and willing, but the system was a bad one. The idea naturally sug- gested itself of seizing the time when the midshipmen are on shore and appropriating it to their culture. In- stead of sending migratory professors to sea with each handful of midshipmen, the midshipmen themselves, in the intervals between sea-duty, might be collected in a body and devote their time to suitable instruction. For the pay of the instructors Congress has provided. In looking out for a modest shelter for the pupils, I was encouraged to ask for Fort Severn, at Annapolis. The transfer was readily made by order of the Secretary of War, and a school was immediately organized on an unostentatious and frugal plan. This institution, by giving some preliminary instruction to the midshipmen before their first cruise; by extending an affectionate but firm supervision over them as they return from sea; by providing them suitable culture before they pass to a higher grade; by rejecting from the service all who fail in capacity or in good disposition to use their time well, will go far to renovate and improve the American navy." The Naval Academy has done more than any other one influence "to renovate and improve the Amer- ican navy," and it would be a most excellent thing for the civil government of the United States if the same 140 THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE renovating and improving process could be applied in the same manner for the production of trained experts in government. In his first annual address to Congress, President Washington, on January 8, 1790, said: "Among the many interesting objects which will engage your atten- tion, that of providing for the common defense will merit particular regard. To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." ^ The main- tenance of our army and navy is for the purpose of pre- serving peace. Let us see what measure of preparedness "against" war (to use the excellent distinction made by the Honorable A. P. Gardner) as a preservative of this peace the navy affords. In 1789, when the department was created, the navy consisted of 22 ships, 456 guns, and 3484 men. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 1914, the enlisted strength of the navy reached a total of 52,667 men, and in May, 1914, the navy's author- ized complement, which had been short for several years, was completely filled. ^ The appropriations for the fiscal year 1914-15 for the naval establishment amounted to more than $140,000,000. I am indebted to the Hon- orable Franklin D. Roosevelt, Assistant Secretary of the Navy, for the following summary of vessels in the navy on February 20, 1915: — 1 Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol. I, p. 65. 2 Report of the Secretary of the Navy for 19H, p. 25. piacen Qf ^Jjvides for the completion by 191.8 of 4 battle cruisers, 8 small Y lays N 1 ily Austria-Hungary 1 ' 1 1 10 2 19 15 rs- ■ il37 80 '753 558 73 175 326 164 ! 259 (c) 84 1228 224 (h) 107 141 (i) — 11 ,340 387 1,660 1 — 17,689 0") ,913 19,531 Ly ore only, 6 flag officers, 20 cap- le Coaf*- cipauj fman ^ ^ ofiic< Jias, U jljgjjgjicy was due to the inclusion of tenanr" \ was benanf'' ^'"^^ officers. Under Italy the July 1, mil, SEA STRENGTH SHIPS Office of .Vara/ 1 itlclUgcnce, Nai'tj Department TABLE I. — VESSELS BUILT TABLE II, — VESSILS BUILDING OR AUTHORIZED Baltleships. Dreadnought type (a) Battleships (6) Battle cruxsers Armored cruisers Cruisers id) Destroyers Torpedo boats Submarines Coast defense vessels (.) 1 Battleships. Drt'adnoutjht type Battle cr^\s^rs Cruistrs Dfntrat/trs Torpetio boats Suhmarinns 20 13 8 4 2 3 3 40 20 22 18 13 7 8 6 9 (A-) 4 2 34 9 11 20 13 6 9 2 74 (fc) 41 14 9 13 9 6 5 167 (k) 130 51 84 50 91 32 18 49 13 135 27 14 (38 39 75 (k) 27 30 G4 13 30 19 6 1 " 1 2 4 1 2 2 C t England (/) Germany ig) United States. . . . 16 7 4 8 4 7 I 1 4 2 4 17 {k) 5 8 2 5 21 (A) 24 11 3 2 44 15 1 (Jcrmany Unil,ed States 18 19 Japan (h) Russia (H Italy ",■; 19 S li Austria-Hungary. . Austria-Hungary . (fi) BaUleshipa having a main battery of all big guns (11 inches or more in caliber). (Ii) UaHlcaliips of (about) 10,000 tons or more displacement, and having more than one caUber in the main battery. (r) Armored cruisers liaving guns of largest caliber in main l>attery and capal)Ie of taking their place in hne of battle with the battleships. Tliey have an increase of speed at the expense of carrying fewer guns in main battery, and a decrease in armor protection. id) Includes all unarmored cruising vessels above 1.500 tons displacement, (c) Includes smaller battleships and monitors. No more vessels of this class are being proposed or built by the great powers. (il) Germany has a continuing shipbuilding progmmmc, governed by a tied law uulhoiinod by tho Reichstag. For 1913 there are nuthori>ed 1 battleship, 1 battle cruiser, 2 cruisers, 12 destroyers, ICvoutual 1 strength to consist of -11 battleships, 20 armored cruisers, -10 eruisora, 14.| dosti'oyors, 72 Bubnuulnon, j (A) S7S,S37„'>I)9 authorised to be o.\pendeil from Itlll to 11117 for the eoustru'elion of war vesaeia. (A) Includes vessels of colonies. 1 (i) Russian shipbuilding programme provides lor die eon\plelioii by IiMn .>( 1 hiUile cruiMcrs. S small 1 cruisers, 3li destroyers, and IS submarines. The following vessels are not included in the tables: Ships over twenty years old from date of launch, unless thoy ha Torpedo craft over fifteen years old. Transports, colliers, repair ships, converted merchant vessels, or any otlier auxiliaries. Vessels of less than 1500 tons, except torpedo craft. Torpedo craft of less than 50 tons. Note. — Vessels undergoing trials are considered as completed. n reconstructed and recniu'd within live yearn. ACTIVE PERSONNEL /Mil/ AuilriifHuniiaty _ 1 1 10 2 19 15 137 HO 7r,:i 558 73 175 326 1114 259 (r) 84 22H 224 (/,) 107 141(1) 11 i,:j40 387 3ti,f) the inchulon ol 1 niler Italy the Office of Naval Intelligence, Navy Department LY AUSTRIA- HUNGARY Building Built Building Number ll Tons (estimated) Number Tons Number Tons (estimated) 7 187,150 3 60,030 4 93,510 — — 6 74,613 — — — — 6 41,700 — — [ . 2 13,380 — 2 4,888 5 13,815 5 21,216 15 14,203 18 9,450 — — 1 2 272 39 6,852 24 5,886 I ^ 5,842 6 1,686 6 5,370 — 212,355 — 221,526 — 125,982 ,815 347,508 j n of battl e with the ik decreas e in armor j ^ which b atterjr and fe all cTui sers except I 'lets hav 5 e not been . within fii ^e years. ;! 1 i ) - WARSHIP TONNAGE OF THE PRINCIPAL NAVAL POWERS NUMBER AND DISPLACEMENT OF WARSHIPS, BUILT AND BUILDING, OF 1500 OR MORE TONS, AND OF TORPEDO CRAFT OF MORE THAN 50 TONS Oflieo o 1 1 ,4SS ;)ii.;iii2 IB 1 17 21 22 421,750 2S,W)() ()7,l)l>0 21,770 17,230 13 20 2 4 II 41 130 27 285,770 2'12,80() 8,108 88,740 04,245 150,747 (;7,1II14 14,140 7 4 5 21 18 lS7,lli4 112,000 20,000 14,400 14,400 H 22 4 11 14 51 13 30 189,050 309,282 12,900 140,295 00,410 35,008 2,528 4 11 '19 117,800 11,950 4 IS 1 20 9 84 135 04 92,308 262,675 8,800 201,724 46,095 35,812 13,426 27,940 8 3 22 193,656 2,653 14,766 2 13 2 2 13 13 50 27 13 41,600 191,380 9,086 55,000 138,483 67,915 20,487 3,017 2,072 4 2 122,400 65,000 1,676 1,200 2 9 91 14 30 98,750 10,380 63,500 52,845 36,748 2,132 6,500 4 8 44 19 159,409 128,000 53,600 53,004 13,284 3 8 9 30 68 19 62,044 90,100 74,020 18,83(1 10,807 11,584 5,475 2 15 2 8 187,150 4,888 14,203 272 5,842 3 18 39 00,030 71,013 41,700 13,380 13,815 0,450 0,8,52 1,080 ■1 21 93,510 21,210 5,8S0 Siil)miii'iinm 6,370 TnUilUmxIiiillUiud lulid li.im liiiililiim 550,250 - 051,713 - 354,804 - 705,133 - 129,750 - 688,840 - 211,075 - 519,040 - 180,276 - 270,801 - 407,957 - 285,400 - 212,355 - 221,620 - 126,082 'I'lilld h.liMl.llill. I>l>d iMlildlMII. 2,714,100 i 1,300,577 894,889 899,915 099,910 678,818 497,816 347,608 HEIjATIVE OIlDEn OF WAILSmi" TONNAGE J'rilAllI oTiln {tonnaue eomfitetal) Omit. Brltiiia (loriniuiy . . .1 Unltml Btivloi Fvnudo 1 .liiptui , Kidy , IlUSHill AuKlriu-Il Ijnry. 2,167,850 961,713 705,133 088,840 510,040 285,400 270,801 221,620 A» tooultl be //iK c Groftl Britain- Cicrmany Franco United States. Japan Russia Italy A\i»triii V building uiere computed Totm 2,7M.10G 1,300,577 899,915 8iM,8S9 099,910 078.818 497.R15 347,508 > Bnttleahipa having a main battery of all big guna. (1 1 inches or more in caliber.) ' I BQttle8hip3 of (about) 10.000 or more tons diaplacement, whoao mnin battorioa aro of more than ono calibtir. ' Includes smaller battleships ami monitors. * Armored cruisers having guns of largest caliber in main battery and capable of taking their place in Una of battle with i battleships. They have an increase of speed at the oxponsc of carrying fewer guna in main battery and li deorouao In am protection. " All unarmore.- = -^ 1 c^ - v^ ^^^ -^e .-N -^ri o N r. . -^. ^ %.' ^ ^ "^ \ .. .^ ^"^ - ^ * ^^ v^^ 1 <. OO' « o . -" / * ^; ■ \^^ 4' • n;-' ^ ''if. 0^.^!^-.% ■ .^\^i:^^3 cpF^:^*^.'^ '- ""^^ v^' ,0 o. vO o. CS^ «' 8 1 \ " . o"^ ^°1'%^. N c; „ < .0 O ' ^ ' ■r 'i' ^ * «'■' o C^' cJ', * 8 1 \ ■ .O' ■< ■» 5? '?' ^ '%r ^ -7