E356 .E6P8 ^lH*J:iH;Hi Hff; IKf LIBRARY OF CONGRESS DDDD5D7'=]5Ha Y- ^ -^ y^r ^^ fMW^ ^O ■f^ "^^. 'o . ). - A>3%{ g^^ V &-_ -f^ 0^ ,^q. .^ b"^/ . 4>^ ,, « <^ <^, «i>> a I 1 V.>. '>-, -1 •.■^j^r ,.y % ^ U A* \ .•^^^ ^p- °V V> « • • f <>■ ^> O ' O . i • V .^;<:. ^ ^. o'^ ,'^" O^ '0,1 • <^ ,-^^\^°"' O. J,"* cM"*. <^^ ^>" .0 '^ X ''^^** .^^^ ^-^o. ''^^^>' .0 '^ X'^^^ /"-^ '"^ O N V--r.\,«' » • o* ^> •i* I. V* .^LV^'^ c\ ,0^ •I'f, "> -^^0^ ,-i ^ o « ^ ,i. \"^:>i.:^.' - ' "-^ ■\ ^ « ^* ^o>^ V-^^ ^^--^ « • o. vV^. •Jt . -'^.. -^ .^^ cO-. ''^.-••' o^\-V^>/'^0. 'o * :^ '^^'' rfm-^^r :Wm'- ^^^f^m- %^ \L' .->-. ':^, e ■ rX^ ,*-^-, ->'^?-. ^O .0- !*• . » • ^^ ^^' c*^-/*. ^. .^ .•^*°'. -^^ ^V^^sVV'. o, ^0 . 'N.- .0^ ,- ^■2K- ^^0^ O o " a ■J '^'■ < O -V, Old Niagara County's Share in the Battle o£ Lake Erie Old Niagara County's Share in the Battle of Lake Erie By Peter A. Porter ^ Publication of the Niagara Frontier Historical Society Niagara Falls, N. Y. 1913 ■Eur'2 DR. T. H. LUVELL, President Niaarara Frontier Historical Soeietv c f f ••,0 11. A. TAYLOR, Corresponding Secretary, Niagara FiDiitior Historical Societv. E. T. WILLIAMS, Recording Secretary, Niagara Frontier Historical Society. 1— I CO -5 o :2; 73 A-* OLD NIAGARA COUNTY'S SHARE IN THE BATTLE OF LAKE ERIE Niagara County does not forg-et that she is the daughter of Genesee; nor that she is also the mother of Erie: and she is proud both of her ancestor and of her offspring. A century- ago Niagara County embraced the whole of the pres- ent County of Erie; the latter being set off from her as a separate county in 1819. Of Perry's fleet of ten armed vessels on Lake Erie, one half (five in all, four during that war. The chief ones of this class were in connection with the con- trol (first its loss and then its regain) of the upper lakes, and especially as regards Perry's victory on Lake Erie; towards which Black Rock made most decided contributions. Five of the nine American vessels which were captured by the British on lakes Erie and Huron in July and Au- gust, 1812, were owned at Black Rock; COMMODORE O. H. PERRY of them bought by the United States within her limits, the other captured from the British by an expedition which was planned within, and set out from, her borders) was made over into gun- boats, put into fighting trim, and start- ed out from old Niagara County. New York's contribution to that fam- ous fleet has not been sufficiently ap- preciated. The War of 1812 was the most impor- tant and the most long drawn out — as well as the most disastrous and destruc- tive event — on the Niagara frontier in the early days of the United States. But besides the many operations right along our river, this frontier bore its part in some occurrences elsewhere three of them being captured at the surrender of IMackinaw. Ebenezer Crosby, a Niagara County man, had the contract to build, at Erie, four gun- boats; three of which formed part of Perry's victorious fleet. Five vessels of that fleet, with which Perry was ready to meet Commodore Barclay's squadron, were prepared for service in Scajaquada Creek, in the winter of 1812. When the war was declared, about the middle of June, 1812, there were about 32 vessels, all told, on the upper lakes. Of these, twenty were owned by Americans; including one United States vessel (which curiously was un- der the control, not of the navy, but of the war department), the Adams. nCTF.n B. PORTER. Twelve were owned by the British, in- cluding four brigs of war, namely Cale- donia, Sfi tons; Hunter, 72 tons; Queen Charlotte, 255 tons; and Lady Prevost, 97 tons. I am aware that it had been stated on liigh authority and common- ly accepted as a fact, that when the war broke out, there were not over fif- teen vessels, all told, on these upper lakes, but this is a decided error. In volume eight of the Proceedings of the Buffalo Historical Society, there is given a contemporary list of 24 vessels which had then been built on those lakes. Of these, sixteen were Ameri- can, and eight were British. And in 1812 only one of these 24, a British ves- sel, had been lost to active service. In this list the Lady Washington is not included. She was the first American vessel on the upper lakes. She was built at lOrie, and carted over the Cana- dian Portage, from Chippawa to Queenstown, sailed out onto Lake On- tario, and was never heard of again. In volume seven of that society's pro- ceedings, there is given a further list of such vessels, nine in all, owned by Americans, and none of them included in the other list. Of these nine, four are recorded as having been lost; leav- ing five to be added to the other 23 — a total of 28 vessels in service on the up- per lakes on July 1, 1812. Certainly these two lists, did not contain a com- plete record. Neither were entirely ac- curate nor did they pretend to be. Un- (l(>u))tedly .some vessels were omitted from Ijoth. Assuming that those there- in unrecorded numbered only four, 1 make 32 the minimum number of ves- sels on Lakes Erie and Huron on July 1, 1812. Then the great problem for both sides was to secure control of those lakes. Whichever one had the preponderance in vessels, and guns thereon, would con- trol them, and also control the Niagara portages (then the only route from the Kast to Detroit and beyond), and abso- lutely prevent the other side from get- ting troops, provisions, guns and am- munition, to its western posts. That was all there was to be shipped then, for the war, of course, put an end to all regular lake commercial business, except as the four above-noted small \essels were lured by the \'ery high freights which could be obtained, to risk the chances of capture by the Brit- ish — mainly between Buffalo and Erie. (Tn July 17th the British captured .Mackinaw. This is not the place to de- tail its strategic importance, so far as its control of the fur trade went, with the attendant influence of its holders over the Indians, scattered over a vast area. Its significance to this article is that by that capture the Britisli secured four American vessels; which were there on commercial business. Three of them were owned at Black Rock. They ER ASTUS r, R AXOER . were the Mary, Captain Rouirli; the Erie, Captain Norton, and the Friends' Goodwill, Captain Lee. The fourth was the Salina, Captain Dubbins, owned at Erie. At the surrender of Detroit in August, 1812, the British captured the United States war vessel, tiie Adams, and soon afterward they captured the Cuyahoga Packet at Maiden, and a lit- tle later the Chippawa. Somewhere on Lake Erie they also captured the Ran- ger and the Nancy, both owned by Por- ter. Barton & Co., of Black P^ock. This makes nine vessels lost to the .\nurican side, and added to the British force. The Connecticut of Black liuck (some accounts erroneously call her the Com- mencement) was the first vessel taken by the British in the war. She was cap- tured off Buffalo, but was restored to her owner the next day because she had been seized before news of the declara- tion reached the American frontier. The British (by means of a special courier sent from Washington by John Jacob Astor to his agent at Queenston) had received the news eighteen hours ahead of our side. The following letter from General Peter B. Porter confirms, though not by name, the capture of the Ranger and Nancy. All the other vessels owned by his firm on the upper lakes are account- ed for by the capture of Mackinaw or, as noted hereafter, l)y sale to the United .States giivernment. Black Rock, August 30, 1812. The Secretary of War: Sir — I inclose you a copy of my letter ot this date to Governor Tompkins, to which I must beg your serious consideration. For God's sake, my friend, arouse and put forth the energies of the nation, and let ub not be beaten by a petty province. War can never be waged by tedious and two-penny cal- culations ot economy in the office at Wash- ington. The poor, but patriotic, citizens of Ohio and the frontiers of Xew York are suf- fering all the miseries of poverty and war. They alone are called out because, perhaps, their march to the frontiers is shorter and, therefore, cheaper, while the rich inhabitants of Pennsylvania are lolling in security and ease. As one of the inhabitants of this fron- tier, I can submit to the loss of property; I can see wirh composure (which is now ac- tually presented to my view) my vessels rid- ing under British colors in a British harbor, but I cannot endure the degradation of my country. Hence, on September 1, 1812, the Brit- ish had 21 vessels on those lakes, a clear gain, by capture, of nine within two months: while the Americans then had but eleven vessels, a clear loss of nine; for they had not captured a single Britisih boat. There was indeed dire need for the United States to build vessels at once above Niagara Falls, if we were to have any chance of success in the campaign of 1813. The British absolutely controlled the upper lakes from August, 1812, until Perry's victory on Lake Erie in Sep- teniber, 1813. So, early in September, 1S12, Commodore Chauncey, who com- manded the United States fleet on Lake Ontario, and who also had jurisdiction over the upper lakes, ordered Lieuten- ant Jesse D. Elliott to pioceed at once to the Niagara frontier; and with the concurrence of General Van Ptcnsselaer, who commanded the army there, to locate a place where he sihuuld build two twent.v-gun \essels, six smaller boats, with barracks for 300 men, who were to be sent on from the seacoast, in order to construct those vessels. Be was also directed to consult with Peter B. Porter and Erastus Granger at Black Rock: and was authorized to buy for the government every vessel he could secure on the upper lakes. Curious as it may seem, Elliott and General Van Rensselaer decided that Scajacjuada Creek was the most desirable point, pre- sumably on the sole ground that there already was a shipyard there, where a vessel had been built as early as 1803; and there Elliott actually began his preparations. On the morning of October ftth, the \'ery diay on which the first body of .ship c-'arpenters (50 in number), reached Black Rock, two Briti.sh vessels an- chored under the guns of Fort Erie. FARMER'S BROTHER w -f^ i-H <-. TO o T-H a (ij a tf ^^ « CJ S6 o o H u o K ^ sr < c HH •p ^ c o 03 p r-* w i-:i c o o < O fe o -^ o w Ph tf 1:3 H +^ PL, o ' were the Caledonia and the De- troit, the latter the former United States war vessel Adams, which thf British bad captured at Detroit. On the suggestion of Farmer's Brother, that wise old Seneca, then 80 years old, Elliott made plans to capture them. That night ihie led 125 men, in three boats, boarded both, cut them loose, and let them drift with the current. He succeeded in g'etting- the Caledon'ia into Scajaquada creek, and' thus adding her to Uncle Sam's navy. The Detroit ran aground on Squaw Island, and during the next day sbe was so battered by the cannon on both sides, as parties from either shore alternately boarded her, that the Americans that night car- ried asihore three of her cannon, and then destroyed her by fire. They were determined that, if they could ni.jt own her, the Britis^h should no longer have her. She had five gums mounted, and there were six more in her hold, the lat- ter Ijeing American cannon, whlcih had been captured^ at Detroit. She also car- ried a large quantity of powder and ball and practically all the American muskets taken at Detroit. Elliott cap- tured two guns on the Caledonia, which, with the three we got from tlie Detroit, added five cannon to Buffalo's arma- ment, and they were badly needed. Eight cannon were also sunk when the Americans burned the Detroit. She would have been a valuable prize to our navy if Elliott had been able to get her into Scajaquada Creek. As it was, he deprived the British of the use of thirteen canmon, and much of the am- munition and muskets which the Brit- ish had so recently taken from us. The picture of her capture is from the one Elliott himself sent to the war depart- ment, accompanying his ofhcial report of tihe expedition, by which he added a vessel to the United States navy, and secured the ship from whose deck Perry himself commanded the little squadron which siailed from Biuffalo for Erie in June, 1813. That one night's work had robbed the British of one tenth of their navy on the upper lakes, leaving the relative number of vessels, British, nineteen; Americans, twelve (with one Briti-sh boat burned). The next day the Senecas held a war dance at the Black Rock navy yard, in Elliott's honor, ant made b-im a member uf the tribe. He had seen how easily he had cross- ed the river, and captured British boats. Why, he now reasoned, was there not an equal danger of the British, at any time, coming over and burning the boats he was about to build, as well as those he had just bought for the gov- ernment? If they did that (and for such an attack they could easily and secretly assemble a larger force than would be provided for the protection of those vessels), the work of his 300 men would be lost; the government would be out large sums and yet would have no vessel on the upper lakes. Was not Scajaquada creek too close to the Brit- ish shore for safety? He consulted four men; Farmer's CAPTAIN ,iA:\n:s sloan. Brother, who had given him such good advice as to cutting out those two ves- sels; Captain James Sloan of Buffalo, who had been his pilot when he cap- tured them; Captain Daniel Dobbins of Erie, who was then in Buffalo, and Captain James Rough. Dobbins had been captured, as also had Rough, with his vessel at Mackinaw by the British. Dobbins had been paroled, and sent in charge of his vessel, as a cartel, to con- vey other paroled men to Detroit. There General Hull insisted on detaining him; and when Hull surrendered, Dobbins was again a prisoner. Fiom a friendly left Washington with a commission in the United States navy and with in- structions to report at once to Elliott and to act under his orders. All three of those men fully concur- red with the advice which Porter and Granger had already given, namely, that Black Rock was too exposed to danger and too easily reached by the enemy, to be a safe selection for a ship- yard where new vessels were to be con- structed. They all pointed out the un- deniable fact that it would be impos- sible to get the vessels Elliott had just bought, or new vessels, from the creek CAPTAIN DANIEL DOBBINS. British officer he secured a pass and managed to make his way back to Erie. From there General Mead sent him direct to Washington; where he brought the first news of the fall of Mackinaw and Detroit to the war de- partment. He retold that news to the cabinet in session, and was asked to rehearse the situation on the lakes; and also specially asked for his advice as to the preparations, and the conduct of, the next season's campaign on the lakes. His familiarity with the condi- tions thereon gave great weight to his advice. He urged the immediate con- struction by the government of several vessels and recommended Erie, Pa., as the best place for their construction. He into Lake Erie, so long as the British held Fort Erie. The only means then known by which vessels could be got up the rapids at Black Rock was liter- ally to haul them up by power furnish- ed by many yokes of oxen, or by large numbers of men. It would take a whole day, with either power, to drag each boat into Lake Erie. And, during a day, the guns of Fort Erie, and of the four batteries which the British had opposite those rapids, could not fail to destroy a slowly moving \'essel. There was an expectancy, there was a hope, that in the spring the Americans would capture Fort Erie, but there was no certainty of it. They all decidedly a 1- vised against building the vessels there. 10 This solid reasoniner convinced Elli- ott. He decided to build the boats elsewhere. He got General Van Rens- selaer's consent; and, largely on Cap- tain Dob'bins's advice, selected Erie, and thither he sent more than two thirds of the carpenters who soon arrived at Buf- falo. The rest of them he kept at Black Rock, where they were set to work transforming the merchant vessels which he had just bought at Black Rock into gunboats. These vessels could not now be got into Lake Erie, in the face of Fort Erie's guns, so they had to re- main in the creek. Elliott secured Gen- eral Van Rensselaer's promise that an ample force should be detailed to guard them during the winter. On December 19, 1812, Captain Dobbins wrote from Erie to the secretary of the navy: "In regard to the vessels cut down and in an unfinished state at Black Rock, there can be little confi- dence placed in their safety. The yard is within reach of the enemy's batteries, and, if finished, the vessels could be cut to pieces in passing up the rapids into the lake." On the very same day the secretary of war wrote to General Dear- born, directing him to sanction General Smyth's retirement. And he added: "The President feels great anxiety for the vessels at Black Rock, as the enemy may seize the opportunity to destr ^y them." The "opportunity" was the ut- ter failure of Smyth's widely heralded and much-prepared plan for the inva- sion of Canada from that place. In that creek were six vessels, one the Canadian brig Caledonia of 85 tons, which Eliott had just captured, with her two cannon. The others Elliott had bought. As I make it out, there were but four other American boats on that lake; all small (Dobbins names three of them: Dove, twenty tons; Eagle, 25 tons; Teazer, twenty tons), all in port at either Erie or Sandusky. All the other American vessels on' Lake Erie, and all such vessels sailing on Lake Huron, were already prizes in British hands. Daniel Dobbins says all American ves- sels on the lakes w'ere either purchased by the United States or captured by the British. Of the twenty American merchant vessels on the upper lakes when war was declared. Porter, Barton & Co. of Black Rock seem to have own- ed five, and to have had a half interest in two others. That firm also had three or four boats on Lake Ontario. All of their vessels, on both lakes, which had not been captured by the British were taken over by our government, as were also all other American boats, both on Lake Erie and Lake Ontario. At Black Rock Elliott bought five boats as follows; The sloop Contractor, of 64 tons, built at Black Rock in 1803. owned by Por- ter, Barton & Co., was now renamed the Trippe. The schooner Amelia, "0 tons, bulk at Detroit in 1802, Porter, Barton & Co. owned a half interest. She had once been called the General Wilkinson, and was now renamed the Tigress. The schooner Ohio, of 60 tons, built at Erie in 18u6. Porter, Barton & Co. owned a half interest. The sahooner Catharine, 90 tons, built at La Salle, 1810, owned by Townsend, Bronson & Co. She was renamed the Somers. The sloop Connecticut, 25 tons, buill a.t Black Rock, owned b\- Peter Colt of that place. I know that historians name four vessels of Perry's fleet in the famous battle as liaving been outfitted at Black Rock, which is correct. But it iit a detail which is not often recorded that six vessels were at Scajaquada Creek that winter, and that all six of them sailed from Buffalo under Perry's com- mand. They were the five just named and the Caledonia. The frontispiece shows six vessels. The Connecticut certainly was at Black Rock in September. She had been cap- tured off Buffalo on June 26th, but was restored the next day, and her owner would not allow her to leave port again. The picture — given as a frontispiece — was published in the Portfolio, in 1815. The accompanying letterpress says it "exhibits a correct view, taken on the spot, of the port of Buffaloe on Lake Erie, at the time of the landing of a part of General Harrison's troops." That publication was issued at Phila- delphia; in which city was the head office of the Holland Company — which then owned Buffalo; was interested in keeping that village before the public — and was also a good advertiser. The picture most certainly does not "correctly represent" Harrison's land- ing. It shows six vessels: fi\'e of them about of a size, the other one smaller. Xow, Perry's fleet, carrying a part of Harrison's army, consisted of eight ves- sels, and they all reached Buffalo to- gether, on October 24, 1813. One of the vessels carried the horses; for between 150 and 200 of those troops were cavalry — Ball's command. Of the other seven, three were brigs, two schooners, and two sloops. But three of those vessels U were very large for that day on the lakes. The Niagara carried twenty guns; the Lady Prevost, thirteen guns; and the Hunter, ten guns' — the two lat- ter having been captured by Perry in the battle. The wrong number of vessels, and the fact that it represents NO large vessels in the fleet, proves conclusively that it was not Harrison's landing. Again, Harrison brought 1,300 men: and there is not even a suggestion of such a num- ber in the picture. At this late date it is impossible to actually produce further proof that the picture does not represent what it claims to be; but the deduction is so plain that it is almost equal to proof. What happened was undoubtedly this: Two years after both events occurred. six vessels from Scajaquada Creek, up the rapids, into Lake Erie. This done, they were ordered to embark and £tc- company the vessels to Erie, as a pro- tection against a much feared (and, as it turned out, a very narrowly escaped) attack from the British fleet, which was known to be at this end of the lake. The picture in itself is perfect proof that Perrj' took six vessels from Buf- falo; five of them armed, and the small- est one unarmed. The latter was in- tended for use as a scout boat. Perry's success as commodore was dependent on his getting those five armed \'essels to Erie, there to join the vessels which had just been built there. A scout boat was absolutely necessary for him on this trip, and was not needed after his safe arrival. He was very particular GUNBOATS OF 1812. the Holland Land Company had the picture prepared — with the correct number and sizes of the vessels, and a correct number of soldiers in boats; to represent Perry's sailing from Buffalo for Erie, on June 13, 1813. Then some bright man and good ad- vertiser — probably a clerk In^ the com- pany's office— suggested that the arrival of a victorious army at the Holland Land Company's village of Buffalo would be a better advertisement for the sale of lots there, than the mere sail- ing of a part of a fleet that later be- came famous. So the plate was left unchanged; but the suggestion was adopted, so far as the descriptive article was concerned. The soldiers in the boats represent, and correctly, the embarkation of the 200 soldiers who had been' sent from Fort George to Buffalo, to help haul the in his orders as to just how those five armed vessels were to line up on the trip — both W'hen sailing abreast, and also when sailing one behind the other. In those orders he never mentioned the Connecticut, because she was never in- tended to be a part of either line. She was always to be far in advance, "on .scout duty." A picture is gi\'en herewith, show- ing the kinds and sizes of the Ameri- can gunboats in 1812. They constituted 170, out of a total of 190, of our Ameri- can navy then. It undoubtedly shows what those Black Rock vessels looked like, wihen they had been transformed. Elliott was ordered to the Lake On- tario ports in December, and did not return to Black Rock untii May. From his departure until Perry's arrival in February, 1813, Sailing Master Dobbins was in charge of the upper lakes, under 12 Commodore Chauncey. But Perry was g'iven a separate and full control of those upper lakes, and Chauncey was left in charge of Lake Ontario. Lieu- tenanl; Angus was in comniiind of the Black Rock navy yard until 1S13, when he was ordered to the coast, I^ieutonant Pettigrew succeeding him ih.ere. Those six vessels were hauled up on the banks of Scajaquada Creek, and during the winter, five were cut down and made over into gunboats. A strong guard of soldiers was maintained close to them, for their protection against an always feared sudden attack from the Canadian shore. In the early spring they were again launched in the creek, and lay there to await the result of the contemplated attack by the Americans of Fort George late in May, which if had towed them into Scajaquada Creek, a battery was ordered built, on the south side thereof, just east of the navy yard, facing north, and so placed as to control the bridge over it, which, ex- cept for the one far to the east (on the road to Batavia, that is the present Main street), was the only such struc- ture o'v'er that stream. Henry Eckford, who later achieved such fame as a naval constructor, came here several times during that winter, for it was under his plans and directions that five of those boats were made ready for warfare. At the end of May, 1813, the Ameri- cans captured Fort George, at the mouth of our river, and the Canadians Then abandoned the entire frontier. The Americans at once occupied Fort VESSELS HAULED UP IN SCAJAQUADA CREEK. successful would result (as it did) in their reaching Lake Erie. Strange as it now seems, during all that time the British made no attempt to destroy them. But they knew the Americans could not get them up into the lake as long as the British held Fort Erie. Again they may have reas- oned that they had better let the Amer- icans get them into fighting trim, and then try to capture them, also captur- ing the villages of Buffalo and Black Rock. On the arrival of the ship carpenters, the little battery near the Block House was materially enlarged, and strength- ened, being known thereafter as The Sailors' Battery. Up to the time El- liott reached Black Rock, in Septem- ber, 1812, all the batteries which had been built thereabouts after the dec- laration of war, had faced Canada, there was no defense against a British attack from the north. But, when El- liott had bought those five vessels, and Erie. Perry himself came to Black Rock on June 1st from Fort George, at \Ahose capture he had commanded the seamen, and on June 13th all six of those vessels had been hauled up the ra,pids and set sail for Erie. Five of them were armed. The other, the <'onnecticut, was unarmed. Perry used her as a scout, for he was taking every precaution to enable him to get those fl^■e armed boats to Erie. It was not Perry's first visit to Buffalo. He had been here in March on his way to Erie, he had then inspected those ve.'^sels in the creek, and had ex- pressed approval of the progress that had been made on them. Five were now armed with cannon taken from the batteries at Black Rock; and under Perry's command, they sailed for Erie on June 13th. "When Perry returned to Buffalo that fall, he was the Hero of Lake Erie. He was accompanied by General "William Henry Harrison, and they were publicly feted by the people 13 of the two villages, General Porter pre- sided at the banquet which they gave them; and the tw^o villages were illumi- nated in their honor. In a History of the Battle of Lake Erie, written by Captain W. W. Dob- bins and based on his father's papers, he says that one of the vessels thus t;iken from Black Rock "was condemn- ed on examination after reaching Erie and sunk in the harbor." That was the old Amelia (now the Tigress), she being unrepairable after the battle was fought. When Perry's fleet left Erie on August 12th it consisted of ten vessels, five of which had come from Black Rock. Of these the Cale- donia, Trippe, Tigress and Somers took part in the Battle of Lake Erie on Sep- tember 10, 1813. The Ohio, under com- mand of that experienced sailor, Daniel twelve-year-old-vessel and the war de- partment had built no fortification to offset Fort Erie. On August 30, 1812, Peter B. Porter wrote from Black Rock to Governor Tompkins: "In March last I urged on the President and to the secretaries of war and the navy the ne- cessity of having a naval force on the lake superior to that of the British, which might have been done at an ex- pense of less than $100,000 (as I then demonstrated), and ready to act by the first of July." His good advice was not heeded. One or two small sloops are said to have been built at Black Rock in the winter of 1812-13. The guard and the camp of soldiers which the United States maintained at and near the navy yard caused their builders to feel that thev could take the risk of their de- BRIDGE OVEE SCAJAQUADA CREEK, 1812. Dobbins, had been sent awaj' a few days before by Perry for provisions. She had not got back when Barclay's fleet (for which Perry had been cruising) was sighted, and Perry rushed into bat- tle with nine vessels. Two of his fleet had been built on the Niagara river; one (the Somers) at La Salle, the other (the Trippe) at Black Rock. Of the six vessels in the British fleet, two were prizes which had been captured from the Americans: and one of these (when captured the Friends Goodwill, re- named th« Little Belt) was built at Black Rock. The navy department had treated Buffalo and the frontier just as badly as the war department had treated them. All the signs had pointed to a certain declaration of war against Great Britain for at least eight months before the President signed the meas- ure. Yet the navy department had made no move during that time toward building any war vessels on the upper lakes, where its sole strength was one struction by the British. There was not a single vessel left in private hands at thi.s end of the lake. Hence, if, in the spring of 1813, the Americans should be able to end the war victoriously, there would at once be a large amount of lake business, at very profitable prices, for any boats that were then ready to take cargoes. It should be noted that this Scajaqua- da Creek derives its name from an old Indian, a descendant of the Neuters, who once dwelt hereabouts, John Con- jocety by name. He dwelt at its mouth, and his son, Philip, continued to dwell there until 1807. The erection of the blockhouse and the presence of the sol- diers then caused him to remove to the Seneca village on Buffalo creek. He died about 1870. and the claim that he was 102 years old was generally believed to be correct. And so, as above narrated, on the banks of Scajaquada Creek there were prepared and armed one half of the number of vessels with which Commo- 14 dore Perry sailed from Erie to attack the British lake squadron, which result- ed in the battle of Lake Erie— the only instance in history where a British fleet, in its entirety, ever surrendered. Whether the Americans recovered those eig'ht cannon from the Detroit, as her hulk lay in comparatively shallow water on the west side of Squaw Is- land, 1 have never been able to learn. As we controlled both shores of the Ni- agara river from the last of May until December in 1813 our men could have removed them during that period with- out interference. Can any of my read- ers throw any light on that point? CAIs/\\ AHA \ \\ \v',*J WffY,^*^ amj\\i' ^ * ^Urljr'j -J?;:/ K 3?'. ^#, V \' ^ ^ *<:. o'- ^-'H^ v^ >",%jj\^:^ o ^f^m /,»., ..:-_. ' "^^v,!^. ci' '^. ^ p • - "- ■^0^ .H o •' ,** aV-^. %^^ ■->- . 3 (^^,^. ^v>U .V :^m^?- ^o\^ ^£01: 1 V ■Q!>- <^ v>. , i^iM . i_ ■ 1M _i M ^Mi I -r ' ' '—I WERT BOOKBINDING JAN 1989 Graniville, PA K^. ' ' ' ■ 'i'.- i