THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS HOUSEHOLD ARTS By EVA W. WHITE GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD 61 Broadway New York 1918 HOUSEHOLD ARTS THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS The results of the study of the Gary Pubhc Schools, undertaken on the invitation of the Super- intendent and the Board of Education of Gary, will be published in eight parts, as follows: The Gary Schools: A General Account By Abraham Flexner and Frank P. Bachman (25 Cents) Organization and Administration George D. Strayer and Frank P. Bachman (15 Cents) Costs Frank P. Bachman and Ralph Bowman (25 Cents) Industrial Work Charles R. Richards (25 Cents) Household Arts Eva W. White (10 Cents) Physical Training and Play Lee F. Hanmer (10 Cents) Science Teaching Otis W. Caldwell (10 Cents) Measurement of Classroom Products Stuart A. Courtis (30 Cents) Any report will be sent postpaid on receipt of the amount above specified. THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS HOUSEHOLD ARTS BY EVA \V. AVIIITE GENERAL EDUCATTOX BOARD 61 Broadway New York City 1918 COPYRIGHT, I9I9, BY General Education Bo.veb JAN 16 \m ICI.A5ll3r3 ^— {.-TO I - ^ CONTENTS PACE Introduction vii I. Aim of Household Arts Work ... 2 A. COOKING II. Time Schedule and Enrollment . . 3 III. The Cafeteria 12 IV. Staff and Instruction 17 V. Tests 23 VI. Merits and Defects 28 B. SEWING VII. Time Schedule and Enrollment . . :^^ VIII. Equipment, Staff ant) Instruction . . 39 IX. Tests 41 X. Merits and Defects 44 INTRODUCTION The G.vry Plan In the last few years both lawmen and professional educators have engaged in a lively controversy as to the merits and defects, advantages and disadvantages of what has come to be called the Gary idea or the Gary plan. The rapidly increasing literature bearing on the subject is, however, deficient in details and too often partisan in tone. The present study was undertaken by the General Education Board at the request of the Gary school authorities for the purpose of presenting an accurate and comprehensive account of the Gary schools in their significant aspects. In the several volumes in which the main features of the Gary schools are separately considered, the reader will observe that, after presenting facts, each of the authors discusses or — in technical phrase — attempts to evaluate the Gary plan from the angle of his particular interest. Facts were gathered in a patient, painstaking, and objective fasliion; and those who want facts, and facts only, will, it is believed, find them in the descriptive and statistical portions of the respective studies. But the successive volumes will discuss principles, as well as viii INTRODUCTION state facts. That is, the authors will not only describe the Gary schools in the frankest manner, as they found them, but they will also endeavor to interpret them in the light of the large educational movement of which they are part. An educational conception may be sound or unsound; any particular effort to embody an educa- tional conception may be adequate or inadequate, effec- tive or ineffective. The public is interested in knowing whether the Gary schools as now conducted are efficient or inefficient; the public is also interested in knowing whether the plan as such is sound or unsound. The present study tries to do justice to both points. What is the Gary plan? Perhaps, in the first instance, the essential features of the Gary plan can be made clear, if, instead of trying to tell what the Gary plan is, we tell what it is not. Ex- cept for its recent origin and the unusual situation as respects its foreign population, Gary resembles many other industrial centers that are to be found throughout the country. Now, had Gary provided itself with the type of school commonly found in other small industrial American towns, we should find there half a dozen or more square brick "soap-box" buildings, each accom- modating a dozen classes pursuing the usual book studies, a playground, with little or no equipment, perhaps a basement room for manual training, a laboratory, and a cooking room for the girls. Had Gary played safe, this is the sort of school and school equipment that it would now possess. Provided with this conventional school INTRODUCTION ix system, the town would have led a conventional school life — quiet, unoffending, and negatively happy — doing as many others do, doing it about as well as they do it and satisfied to do just that. As contrasted with education of this meager type, the Gary plan is distinguished by two features, intimately connected with each other: First — the enrichment and diversification of the curriculum; Second — the administrative device that, for want of a better name, will be tentatively termed the duplicate school organization. These two features must first be considered in general terms, if the reader is to understand the detailed descrip- tion and discussion. As to the curriculum and school activities. WTiile the practice of education has in large part continued to follow traditional paths, tlie progressive literature of the subject has abounded in constructive suggestions of far-reaclung practical significance. Social, political, and industrial changes have forced upon the school responsibilities formerly laid upon the home. Once the school had mainly to teach the elements of knowledge; now the school is charged witli the physical, mental, and social training of the cliild. To meet these needs a changed and enriched curriculum, including community activities, facilities for recreation, shop work, and house- hold arts, has been urged on the content side of school work; the transformation of school aims and discipline X INTRODUCTION on the basis of modem psychology, ethics, and social philosophy has been for similar reasons recommended on the side of attitude and method. These things have been in the air. Every one of them has been tried and is being practised in some form or other, somewhere or other. In probably every large city in the country efforts have been made, especially in the more recent school plants, to develop some of the features above mentioned. There has been a distinct, unmistakable, and general trend toward making the school a place where children "live" as well as "learn." This movement did not originate at Gary; nor is Gary its only evidence. It is none the less true that perhaps no- where else have the schools so deliberately and explicitly avowed this modern policy. The Gary schools are oflBi- cially described as "work, study, and play" schools — schools, that is, that try to respond adequately to a many- sided responsibility; how far and with what success, the successive reports of the Gary survey will show. It must not, however, be supposed that the enriched curriculum was applied in its present form at the out- set or that it is equally well developed in all the Gary schools. Far from it. There has been a distinct and uneven process of development at Gary; sometimes, as subsequent chapters will show, such rapid and unstable development that our account may in certain respects be obsolete before it is printed. When the Emerson school was opened in 1909, the equipment in laboratories, shops, and museums, while doubtless superior to what INTRODUCTION xi was offered by other towns of the Gary t}pe, could have been matched by what was to be found in many of the better favored larger towns and cities at tlie same period. The g>Tnnasium, for example, was not more than one third its present size; the industrial work was not un- precedented in kind or extent; the boys had woodwork, the girls cooking and sewing. But progress was rapid: painting and printing were added in 191 1; the foundr}-, forge, and machine shop in 19 13. The opportunities for girls were enlarged by the addition of the cafeteria in 1913. The auditorium reached its present extended use as recently as the school year 1913-14. The Froebel school, first occupied in the fall of 191 2, started with facilities similar to those previously introduced piecemeal into the Emerson. These facihties, covering in their development a period of years, represent the effort to create an elementary school more nearly adequate to tlic needs of modem urban life. The curriculum is enriched by various ac- tivities in the fields of industry, science, and recreation. Questions as to the efficiency with which these varied activities have been administered wOl be discussed by the various contributors to the present study. Mean- while, it is perhaps only fair to point out that the modem movement calls not only for additions to, but elimina- tions from, the curriculum and for a critical attitude toward the products of classroom teaching. How far, on the academic side, the Gary schools reflect this aspect of the modem movement will also presently appear. 3di INTRODUCTION The administrative device — the "duplicate" organiza- tion, noted above as the second characteristic feature of the Gary plan — stands on a somewhat different footing, as the following considerations make plain. Once more, Mr. Wirt was not the inventor of the in- tensive use of school buildings, though he was among the first — if not the very first — to perceive the purely educa- tional advantage to which the situation could be turned. The rapidity with which American cities have grown has created a difficult problem for school administrators — the problem of providing space and instruction for chil- dren who increase in number faster than buildings are constructed. The problem has been handled in various ways. In one place, the regular school day has been shortened and two different sets of children attending at different hours have been taught daily in one building and by one group of teachers. Elsewhere, as in certain high schools, a complete double session has been con- ducted. The use of one set of schoolrooms for more than one set of children each day did not therefore originate at Gary. Another point needs to be considered before we discuss the so-called duplicate feature of the Gary plan. In American colleges, subjects have commonly been taught by specialists, not by class teachers. The work is "de- partmentalized" — to use the technical term. There is a teacher of Latin, a teacher of mathematics, a teacher of physics, who together instruct every class — not a separate teacher of each class in all subjects. Latterly, 1 ,1 ^jRflkV ' INTRODUCTION xiii departmentalization has spread from the college into the high school, until nowadays well organized high schools and the upper grades of elementary schools arc quite generally ''departmentalized,'' i.e., organized with special teachers for the several subjects, rather than with one teacher for each grade. Out of these two elements. Gar}- has evolved an admin- istrative device, the so-called duplicate school, which, from the standpoint of its present educational signifi- cance, does indeed represent a definite innovation. For the sake of clearness, it will be well to explain the theory of the duplicate school by a simplified imaginary example : Let us suppose that elementary school facilities have to be provided for, say, i,6oo children. If each class is to contain a maximum of 40 children, a schoolhouse of 40 rooms would formerly have been built, with perhaps a few additional rooms, little used, for special activities; except during the recess (12 to 1:30) each recitation room would be in practically continuous use in the old- line subjects from 9 to 3 :^o, when school is adjourned till next morning. A school plant of this kind may be represented by Figure I, each square representing a schoolroom. The "duplicate" school proposes a different solution. Instead of providing 40 classrooms for 40 classes, it requires 20 classrooms, capable of holding 800 children; and further, playgrounds, laboratories, shops, gardens, gymnasium, and auditorium, also capable of holding XIV INTRODUCTION 800 children. If, now, 800 children use the classrooms while 800 are using the other facilities, morning and after- noon, the entire plant accommodates 1,600 pupils throughout the school day; and the curriculum is greatly enriched, since, without taking away anything from their classroom work, they are getting other branches also. A school thus equipped and organized may be represented FIGURE I REPRESENTS OLD-FASHIONED SCHOOLHOUSE 40 rooms for 40 classes, of 40 children each, i. e., facilities for the academic instruc- tion of 1,600 children. A school yard and an extra room or two, little used, for special activities, are also usually found. by Figure II, in which A represents 20 classes taking care of 40 children each (800 children) , and B represents special faciUties taking care of 800 children. As A and B are in simultaneous operation, 1,600 children are cared for. This method of visualizing the "duplicate" school serves to correct a common misconception. The plan aims to intensify the use of schoolrooms; yet it would be INTRODUCTION xv incorrect to say that 20 classrooms, instead of 40, as under the old plan, accommodate 1,600 children. For while the number of classrooms has been reduced from 40 to 20, special facilities of equal capacity have been added in the form of auditorium, shops, play- ground, etc. The 20 classrooms apparently saved FIGURE n REPRESENTS THE GARY EQUIPMENT A B 20 classrooms for academic instruction Special facilities, takinR care of Soochil- of 20 classes of 40 children each (800 chil- drcn in the mominR hours and an equal drcn) in the morning hours and an equal number in the afternoon hours (1,600 in all number in the aftcrnwn (i.Ooo in all daily) daily) Auditorium Shops Laboratories Playground, gardens, gymnasium and library have been replaced by special facilities of one kind or another. The so-called duplicate organization and the longer school day make it possible to give larger facilities to twice as many children as the classrooms alone would accommodate. The duplicate school, as devel- oped at Gary, is not therefore a device to relieve conges- tion or to reduce expense, but the natural result of efforts to provide a richer school life for all children. JEvi INTRODUCTION The enriched curriculum and the duplicate organ- ization support each other. The social situation re- quires a scheme of education fairly adequate to the entire scope of the child's activities and possibilities; this cannot be achieved without a longer school day and a more varied school equipment. The duphcate school endeavors to give the longer day, the richer curriculum, and the more varied activities with the lowest possible investment in, and the most intensive use of, the school plant. The so-called duplicate school is thus a single school with two different t}^es of facilities in more or less constant and simultaneous operation, morning and afternoon. Such is the Gary plan in conception. What about the execution? Is it reahzed at Gary? Does it work? What is involved as respects space, investment, etc., when ordinary classrooms are replaced by shops, play- grounds, and laboratories? Can a given equipment in the way of auditorium, shops, etc., handle precisely the same number of children accommodated in the class- rooms without doing violence to their educational needs on the one hand, and without waste through temporary disuse of the special faciHties, on the other? To what extent has Gary modified or reorganized on modern lines the treatment of the common classroom subjects? How efficient is instruction in the usual academic studies as well as in the newer or so-called modern subjects and activities? Is the plan economical in the sense that equal educational advantages cannot be procured by INTRODUCTION xvii any other scheme except at greater cost? These and other questions as to the execution of the Gary plan are, as far as data were obtainable, discussed in the separate volumes making up the present survey. The concrete questions above mentioned do not, how- ever, exhaust the educational values of a given school situation, f'rom every school system there come im- ponderable products, bad as well as good. Aside from all else, many observ^ers of the Gary schools report one such imponderable in the form of a spiritual something which can hardly be included in a study of administra- tion and eludes the testing of classroom work. These observers have no way of kno\nng whether Gar}- school costs are high or low; whether the pupils spell and add as well as children do elsewhere; but, however these things may be, they usually describe the pupils as characterized by self-possession, resourcefulness, and happiness to an unusual degree. While different schools and indeed different parts of the same school var)- in this respect, the members of the survey staff agree tliat, on the whole, there is a basis of fact for these obser\'ations. Gary is thus something more than a school organization charac- terized by the two main features above discussed. The reason is not far to seek. Innovation is stimu- lating, just as conformity is deadening. Experiment is in this sense a thing wholesome in itself. Of course it must be held to strict accountabiUty for results; and this study is the work of persons who, convinced of the necessity of educational progress, are at the same time xviii INTRODUCTION solicitous that the outcome be carefully observed. The fact that customary school procedure does not rest upon a scientific basis, does not wiUingly submit itself to thorough scrutiny, is no reason for exempting educa- tional innovations from strict accountability. The very reverse is indeed true ; for otherwise innovation may im- peril or sacrifice essential educational values, without actually knowing whether or not it has achieved definite values of its own. Faith in a new program does not absolve the reformer from a watchful and critical atti- tude toward results. Moreover, if the innovator for- mulates his purposes in definite terms and measures his results in the fight of his professed aims, the conservative cannot permanently escape the same process. Gary, like all other educational experiments, must be held account- able in this fashion. Subject however to such ac- countabihty, the breaking of the conventional school framework, the introduction of new subject matter or equipment, even administrative reorganization, at Gary as elsewhere, tend to favor a fresher, more vigorous interest and spirit. Defects will in the following pages be pointed out in the Gary schools — defects of organization, of ad- ministration, of instruction. But there is for the reasons just suggested something in the Gary schools over and above the Gary plan. Problems abound, as in every living and developing situation. But the problems are the problems of life, and, as such, are in the long run perhaps more hopeful than the relatively smooth functioning of a stationary school system. Thus, not- INTRODUCTION xix withstanding the defects and shortcomings which this study will candidly point out, the experiment at Gary rightly obser\'ed and interpreted is both interesting and stimulating. I. AIM OF HOUSEHOLD ARTS WORK In Professor Richards' report^ it is pointed out that the industrial work for boys is not vocational in aim. Shop activities are not meant to make carpenters, paint- ers and plumbers, but to furnish growing boys with op- portunities for the development of senses and muscles and concrete experiences which will enable them to par- ticipate intelligently in a social order in which industry bulks large. Fundamentally, the same principle holds of the work in the household arts for girls; that is, it is not primarily intended to train expert seamstresses or expert cooks. Still, instruction in cooking and sewing is not on precisely the same footing as instruction in foundry work or carpentering; for, in addition to general educative value, the household arts have for girls greater personal value and a more intimate social bearing than has shop work for boys. Besides stenography and t>'pewriting, the Gary schools provide instruction for girls in printing, gardening, cook- ing, and sewing. The present report deals only with cooking and sewing. - •See report on Industrial \\i)rk. 'For printing, sec report on Industrial Work, and for gardening, see report on Science Teaching. A. COOKING II. TIME SCHEDULE AND ENROLLMENT COOKING is taught regularly in the elementary schools in the seventh and eighth grades, with pupils from the lower grades acting as helpers. The instruction is condensed into courses from ten to thirteen weeks in length, one or two hours daily. Pupils must enroll for at least one course one hour daily, and may take more. While cooking is thus compulsory for elementary pupils, it is optional for high school girls, and may be elected by thcni in the ninth, tenth, eleventh, and twelfth grades, at the Emerson and Frocbel schools, which alone have high school students. During the first term, 1915-1916,441 elementary school pupils, includ- ing helpers, were enrolled in cooking classes, and during the fourth, 280.^ (Tables I, III, IV.) The reports from Jefferson, Glen Park, and Beveridge do not distinguish between helpers and those regularly enrolled, though it may be assumed that children from •The greatest care has been exercised in preparing the enrollment data for cooking and sew-ing, but owing to the frequent change of classes and changes in the make-up of the same class, and to differences in reports which we were unable to reconcile, we arc not satisfied that the tables are more than appro.\imatcly correct cither as to numbers or grade distri- bution. 4 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS the third to the sixth grades are helpers, rather than students (Table I). At Glen Park, of the 78 pupils enrolled, 42 took cooking one hour a day and 36 for two hours daily from September to December, and all took one hour per day from December to April. At Beve- ridge, pupils continued in cooking one hour per day throughout the year. This is a considerable amount of time for elementary grades. It occurred, however, not because it was considered wise to stress household arts, but because of a shortage of teachers in other depart- ments of special work. Comparatively few high school students elect cooking. Emerson, for example, enrolled during 1915-1916 a total of only 32 for thirteen weeks, and Froebel, 57 for ten weeks (Table II). They belong chiefly to the first two high school years ; no junior or senior elected cooking at Froebel, and but two seniors and one junior at Emerson. It is to be noted, however, that many high schools do not provide household arts. The classes in cooking are always small, never con- taining over twenty and averaging from twelve to fifteen. This would be admirable, if the group were homogeneous; unfortunately, a class in cooking is seldom made up of pupils from one grade or from closely related grades. Not infrequently a class comprises pupils from the third to the ninth grades. To be sure, the younger children are supposed to assist the older; nevertheless, their pres- ence renders difficult the concentration of attention upon the needs of the regular pupils. TIME SCHEDULE AND ENROLLMENT w o 3 M Z u H ea in in Pupils Enrolled 1 hr. 12 IS d&£ - H r. i Ten Weeks No infor- mation g Pupils EnroUc'l 1 hr. 13 26 15 3 57 o:3:§ d§-S M-- in n M 2 u Z 2 2 M »r r d&2 n ^ r". M O M-*in!cr^« 1 t~M31» fR No. of Pup.I Pupils En- Enrolled rolled 1 hr. ?3 = 2 — — r~ M c> X 1 r-;TU-.Xt-« 3 0.3, o o u ! T in -.c i^ 00 3S-S2 O ? J S E „ -' 5 o E G I «_ " • -< 1 F X E — 1 t> o.— J. '- .-Em e £-9 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS to 05 w w i H 3 2 -1 oeoi-((M (M -i No. of Pupils Enrolled OCOi-l(M CO CO (M w w w w H w H Q z o O C/2 3 2 N 2 CO CO No. of Pupils Enrolled eo CO i \A w w w « t-H H H ^X3 3 2 eo N w z H a ^ S -J 00 00 J3 m\a 00 No. of Pupils Enrolled woo O OiOi-tpJ 3 e2 8 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS The time allowance for cooking is unusually liberal. On the basis of two hours per day for five days a week for 13 weeks, 130 hours are offered as compared with two hours per week for 40 weeks or 80 hours in the average school system. This number of hours added to a like number of hours in sewing shows that 260 hours may be devoted to household arts in a year. On the basis of the minimum of ten weeks' cooking for one hour per day and the same for sewing, 100 hours are scheduled for these subjects. But the allowance does not work out in practice. The groups are in continuous flux. Pupils are withdrawn in the course of a term; new pupils are admitted irreg- ularly. There is no record of the make-up of the group or of the specific tasks accomplished. The method of grading, that is, dividing the grade into A, B, C sections, and the change of classes at the end of each ten or thirteen week period also add to the confusion. While records show the number of girls enrolled in cooking classes, it is impossible to say precisely how much instruction and experience they have had, inasmuch as term lengths are not uniform in the different schools and as the periods are sometimes one hour and some- times two. Thus, for example, eighth grade pupils at Emerson had one hour of cooking daily in the first term of 1915-1916, while those who took cooking in the second term had twice as much (Table III). At Froebel, on the other hand, the eighth grade pupils were enrolled for two hours during the first and second terms, TIME SCHEDULE AND ENROLLMENT •o£ nC 2si .c t£ £5 U U '^ J3 — •^in t^ s^ ■X • u u ■^ -J a= ae n «« "^JS •u H *0:S — d&'e -"'Tin t^ t^ M ;?;b- = 1^ St n 5 M £5 u u 14 tC — 'S) f s ^ Ul >-o nC 2 w Ul I- o f M " j: g o _"0 U *— tfl Jj M or: — (/3 6&£ (O '- VO -T X lO ^^5 •'S nE « ■O ^s. J3 « £| U w "3 ■"' J3 g22 S^ Jj 2 u u ±-o nJ a ^ '^ ja «^£tO o s; m •fl b o 2 2 * 52 2 g u ■3 a MTlfltCr- X S H O lO THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS TABLE IV ENROLLMENT IN ELEMENTARY COOKING CLASSES, 1915-1916: FROEBEL FmsT Ten Weeks No. of Regularly Enrolled Enrolled as Helpers GRADE Pupils Enrolled Ihr. 2 hrs. Ihr. 2 hrs. 3 4 10 6 4 5 39 33 ; 6 6 7 7 7 11 11 8 12 12 Total 79 44 12 19 4 Second Ten Weeks Total 12 26 11 49 12 12 11 11 26 26 Total 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total Third Ten Weeks 26 28 69 15 15 23 19 4 17 2 "65" Fourth Ten Weeks 13 2 21 26 13 47 17 19 4 40 TIME SCHEDULE AND EXROLLIMENT ii but in the other terms for a single period (Table IV). Again, the helper system extends at Emerson as low as the third grade, but at Froebel not below the fourth. The variation in hours for regular cooking pupils is due to the fact that additional time beyond one hour is optional. Helpers, however, generally speaking, have no choice. They are allotted either to cooking or sewing as the program is worked out, in the making of which teachers, pupils, and resources are considered. III. THE CAFETERIA THE work in cooking centers about the school luncheon. Many of the children go home at the noon recess ; many get their entire luncheon at school, while others bring a luncheon from home, supplementing it with hot soup, cocoa, or dessert. The lunch rooms are open from 11:15 to 1:15. During 1915- 1916 Emerson served 44,582 persons, including teachers and guests; Froebel, 17,842; and Jefferson, 7,889. The cafeterias in the newer school buildings are well equipped ; those in the older buildings have been arranged as conveniently as possible. At Emerson there is a large kitchen and separate dining room, tastefully decorated by the art students. The kitchen is equipped with a hotel size range, steam table, continuous cooking tables with individual gas plates, and storage place for uten- sils in drawers and small cupboards; a refrigerator, wall closets and a supply room, and serving counters. The dining room is furnished with substantial oak chairs and tables; cutlery and china are provided in restaurant quantities. The quality of the food supplied is good, and the prices are reasonable, as shown by the schedule at Emerson for September : THE CAFETERIA 13 Vegetable soup Noodle soup Bean soup . Corn chowder . Cold meat . Baked beef hash, Span ish sauce . Leg of veal . Braised potatoes . Mashed potatoes . Glazed sweet potatoes Cabbage StufTed tomatoes . Sweet corn . Stuffed sweet peppers Ham sandwich . Peanut butter sandwich Cabbage and cucumber salad Orange and grape salad Grape and nut salad . 04 04 04 04 05 ^5 07 03 03 03 03 05 03 03 03 03 05 07 07 Fruit salad . Peach tapioca Apple dumpling, sauce Chocolate pudding Apple sauce Scalloped apple, cinna mon sauce Orange float Punch Grape punch Baked apple Ice cream Apple Banana . Cake Hot bread Hot rolls Lemonade CofTce . Cocoa . ^5 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 02 05 03 03 03 02 02 03 05 03 The average lunch charge per person was, at Emerson, 13.9c.; at Frocbel, 14.2c.; and at Jefferson, 15c. At Froebcl the lunches are cooked and served in one room, although there is a small alcove for the teachers and guests. The equipment is of the same general char- acter as that of the Emerson, though neither so extensive nor so complete. Its present inventory value is S750. Jefferson shows what can be done on an extremely modest scale. A basement room, not originally con- 14 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS structed as a cooking laboratory, has been partitioned off and painted white, one side serving as the kitchen, the other as the lunch room. A similar use is made of ordi- nary basement rooms at Beveridge and Glen Park. The entire operating expenses of the cooking depart- ments, with the exception of fuel and the salaries of the instructors at Emerson and Froebel and half the salary of the teacher at Jefferson, are met from the proceeds of TABLE V 'Financial Statement of Emerson Cafeteria, 1915-1916 NUMBER SERMiD RECEIPTS DISBURSE- MENTS PROFITS September October 3,958 4,127 3,869 4,255 4,998 5,080 4,738 3,711 4.851 4,995 $ 465.32 547.08 540.64 623.81 705.24 739.40 730.28 604.04 653.13 602.81 $ 410.62 499.62 508.64 573.45 674.49 693.68 721.70 576.25 632.00 519.24 $ 54.70 47.46 November December January February March 32.00 50.36 30.75 45.72 8.58 April May 27.79 21.13 June 83.57 Total 44,582 $6,211.75 $5,809.69 $402.06 the cafeteria. An examination of the receipts and dis- bursements, as submitted by the Gary authorities, at Emerson, Froebel, and Jefferson is interesting as bearing on the question of financing such departments. The total receipts at Emerson for 1915-1916 were $6,211 and the disbursements $5,809, leaving a net profit of $402 (Table V). These disbursements in- clude, however, not only the cost of food, but also the THE CAFETERIA 15 salaries of two adult helpers at a monthly wage of S65 and S40 respectively, who assist in preparing the lunches and do most of the rough work. It also includes pay for a pupil cashier, and for pupils who assist in ser\-ing and in washing dishes. While the Frocbel cafeteria shows a net profit of only $22.63 (Table VI), the actual profit was in excess of this, for the disbursements include not only the pay of the TABLE \1 1 i\\xciAL Statement of Froebel Cafeteria, 1915-1916 September . October. . . November . December. January . . . February. . March . . . . April May June Total. number RECEIPTS DISBURSE- SER\ED MENTS 1.787 - .- ".(J $ 148.94 1,943 IJb&i.M 232.76 I 1,677 238.82 247.80 1.184 171.29 172.69 2.018 250.48 232.57 2,035 284.90 207.22 1,938 271.25 311.57 1,353 189.39 243.36 2.162 302.72 333.33 1.745 354.01 394.30 $2,547.17 $2,524.54 $ 66.56 36.05 —8.98 —1.40 17.91 77.68 -40.32 —53.97 —30.61 -^0.29 $22.63 adult helper at $60 per month, but also expenditures for equipment amounting to Si 50. JcfTcrson makes the best showing of all, for even after paying half the salary of the instructor and an assistant for two hours a day at $10 per month, there remained a net profit for the year of $453.30 (Table VII). In all instances it is the policy of the school authorities to use the surplus for the benefit of the pupils either in adding i6 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS to the teaching staff or in improving the equipment. An accimiulation of profits is not permitted. The financial experience of Emerson, Froebel, and Jefferson demonstrates that cooking departments offer- ing hmited opportunities may be operated, after the original capital outlay, without cost to the system other than the salaries of professionally trained teachers, and may even be made to pay a part of this expense. TABLE VII Financial Statement of Jefferson Cafeteria, 1915-1916 September . October . . . November . December . January. . . February. . March . . . . April May June Total. NUMBER RECEIPTS DISBURSE- served MENTS 417 $ 57.15 $ 59.12 886 143.95 89.97 649 71.23 40.58 877 115.65 62.68 970 112.45 50.13 520 126.47 88.00 1,099 191.13 146.27 595 86.69 64.63 959 153.31 76.31 917 125.69 52.73 7,889 $1,183.72 $730.42 -1.97 53.98 30.65 52.97 62.32 38.47 44.86 22.06 77.00 72.96 $453.30 TV. STAFF AND INSTRUCTION THE teachers fall into three groups. Emerson, Froebel, and Jefferson have professionally trained instructors from the University of Chicago, from Cornell University, and from Valparaiso University. Their salaries are Si,ooo, S750 and S600 respectively. At Glen Park a regular teacher with slight special preparation conducts the work, and at Beveridge a prac- tical housekeeper, with no professional training, is in charge. Practical housekeepers receive from $40 to S65 a month. It is difTicuIt to determine definitely the content of the cooking instruction in cither the elementary schools or the high schools, since there is no systematic course of study for either all schools or any one school. !More- over, the year of the sur\'cy chanced to be one of unusual disorganization. The teacher at the Froebel school had been in the system only since September and was preparing to leave, as was also the instructor at Emer- son. Teachers changed at JelTerson during the spring, and at Glen Park all cooking gave way in April to gardening, while at Beveridge nothing more than the preparation of the school luncheon has ever been at- tempted. However, effort was being made, at least 17 i8 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS at the Emerson, Froebel, Jefferson, and Glen Park schools, to meet the minimimi elementary, and at Emer- son and Froebel the minimmn high school, requirements of the State Department of Public Instruction.^ Be- yond these minimum requirements, each teacher was free to plan and to execute such daily tasks as in her judg- ment were calculated to meet local and individual needs. As has already been stated, the preparation of food for the cafeteria forms the basis of the Gary work whether of elementary or high school grade. There are no cook- ing laboratories or facihties other than the kitchens and utensils employed in the preparation of the noon luncheon. The same equipment is used by both ele- mentary and high school students and the same in- structor directs both groups. The children help to pre- pare the food, set the tables, and do the serving, the older pupils being held for the more responsible tasks. Under these conditions, the content of the cooking instruction can be best inferred from typical menus : MONDAY TUESDAY Cream of tomato soup Roast pork Boiled ham Sweet potatoes Baked potatoes Stewed tomatoes Tuna fish salad Cabbage salad Tomato salad Brown betty Cup cake Chocolate cream Peach dumplings 1" Domestic Science must be taught to the girls of the 7th and 8th grades . . . two regular recitation periods per week." "High Schools must provide at least one full year's work." f Bulletin No. 17, State Department of Public Instruction, p. 214.) „ STAFF AND INSTRUCTION 19 WEDNESDAY THURSDAY Lima bean soup Hot roast beef sandwiches Roast beef Scalloped meat Boiled potatoes Steamed cabbage Banana salad Ham sandwich Washington pie Orange salad Stew'ed prunes Marble cake Steamed pudding Lemon cookies It is possible to cover the field by means of such varied menus quite as thoroughly as by means of defi- nitely organized courses, provided the teacher keeps track of what the pupils have done and what remains for them to do. Unfortunately, however, except in one school there were no such records, so that between the absence of records and the frequent change of teachers, there was danger of repetition without progress. Unquestionably, in the Emerson school, where individual records were found, the pupils were getting broader and more adequate instruction than elsewhere, as is apparent from the schedule given on the following page. This schedule shows that the instructor responsible for the schedule had a plan underlying her w^ork. Note, for example, the soup column. The making of cream soup of various kinds was driven into a girl's under- standing by repetition and yet the monotony was relieved by varying the kind of cream soup. By tabu- lating what the pupils had done, the teacher had a record of accomplislmient to guide herself and her successor. 20 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS « Clove Sauce Baked Custard Bread Pudding Rice Custard J3 c 1 =^3fSf^^5g '^w 1 > cj U cS 000 UUU ! g '3: ■a ta m •a -^1 -w ■« ja W Pi W •^ S 4> 3 4 22 12 10 5 22 22 6 13 13 7 15 11 4 8 5 5 Total 77 29 4 34 10 36 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS o o w u b^ in M M M ^73 J H T- 1) M rt a C (M (M H 53 :S (M ^ ? 2 ?P c f^w I— ( to 03 H 1-H a ^ TS ••-I u) 5 CJ 3 2 (M K* M S ^ ^« t-IM«DOO CO W COCOr-l C5 w 1—1 »-( w H 73 N 0:3:3 • a tXM^DOO CO 3 fc! oocoi-H en ^^^ w § CT>Oi-((M 3 pj rH T-H rH "0 H TIME SCHEDULE AND ENROLLMENT 37 u z ;2 ^T3 3 2 -J N N -^ CO No. of Pupils Enrolled t-;D?CCT) 00 CO II "? 2 -J »0 NN »— 1 TT CONGO No. of Pupils Enrolled Ol CO TJ" U5 H g u N CO c^J 00 MN N ^H *- TTOOmtO CO No. of Pupils Enrolled ' children receive the explanatory and supplementary in- struction necessar}'' to make their practical work intelligible, two written tests were given. The ques- tions addressed to 2$ ninth, tenth, and eleventh grade girls were as follows: 1. Name the common sewing stitches. Tell how each should be used. 2. Explain a French seam. Give an example of its use. 3. To do good sewing, what supplies should be on hand? 4. How do you test a new paper pattern? 5. What t^pes of persons should avoid plaids? Stripes? Bright colors? 6. What do you consider essential to good gowning? 7. WTiat points should be remembered in sewing a sleeve into a garment? 8. How can a woman, when buying, influence factory conditions under which clothing is made? Explain. 9. What decides you to choose between ready-made and home-made garments? 10. How much instruction have you had in sev^'ing? Name the articles you have made. Questions i, 2, 3, and 5 were answered correctly. Questions 4 and 7 brought out surprisingly loose, 41 42 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS general answers, considering that question lo elicited a long list of articles. Questions 6 and 9 were answered incompletely, only- one factor, as a rule, being mentioned. Question 8 was not attempted by most of the pupils. The second test was given to 35 tenth, eleventh, and twelfth grade students. The questions were as follows: 1. What considerations enter into the choice of different kinds of fabrics? 2. When is a woman "well dressed"? 3. How should a paper pattern be altered if the waist is too long? If the waist is too short? 4. Name, in succession, the steps to be taken in cutting out a skirt when a paper pattern is used. 5. Which is easier to make, a shirt-waist of plain ma- terial or a shirt-waist of plaid material? Explain. 6. Explain what a placket is. 7. TeU how to press a seam. 8. With what sewing machine are you familiar? What are its special characteristics? 9. How do you figure the cost of an article of underwear? 10. Write a list of articles you have made at home. Questions 3, 5, 6, and 7 were answered, in the main, correctly. Questions i and 2 were answered in very general terms. Question 8 was not answered correctly by a single mem- ber of the group, yet all stated the make of a machine. Questions 4 and 9 elicited indefinite and inaccurate answers. TESTS 43 Question lo brought out a long list. The pupils do reasonably well, it will be observed, with questions dealing with facts and with questions related closely to their experiences, but they are weak when called on for general information and for reasoned answers. In justice to the pupils, it should be said that there is practically no class discussion. And in justice to the teachers, it should be remembered that the numbers tested are small, that the courses in sewing are narrow, and there is no leeway for related work. Though the teachers recognize the value of supplementary comment and instruction, the opportunities for it are very Limited. X. MERITS AND DEFECTS THERE is no doubt that sewing instruction in the past has erred by too close application of the A, B, C of technique, and by devoting too much time to drill on valueless objects. Gary is to be commended for breaking away from this lock-step pro- cedure. But in attempting to construct a course in sewing around personal and family needs, it is quite possible that she has gone to the other extreme. The theory of the Gary work in sewing assumes that the reality of the task assures the child's interest and that, as compared with this, logical sequence in the tasks set is of inferior importance. The proposition cannot, however, be accepted in this simple form. While the older model exercises have been rightly banished, some form of regular progress is unquestionably indis- pensable. It is the teacher's business to advance the child more or less regularly through the main steps of plain sewing, dressmaking and millinery, with constant regard at each step for the realities possible. Thus, merely formal training is avoided; but, on the other hand, some consideration beyond the practical needs of the moment controls procedure. Gary wisely avoids mass teaching in sewing. On the 44 MERITS AND DEFECTS 45 other hand, with its classes of 25 or 30, helpers being included, individualization is apt to distract the teacher and to dissipate her energies. As each pupil goes her own way, it is necessary to make the same explanation over and over again, and the teacher is constantly on the jump. Far more, we beUeve, could be done for the children if they were handled in groups. Certain prin- ciples in all household art processes can be demonstrated and explained to a number of pupils at one time. The majority will be able, as a result of the demonstration, to carry out the process, and thus the instructor is left free to help those in need of special assistance. It may be, too, that this excessive elTort to individual- ize instruction accounts for the strain noticeable among the practical assistants, especially when this is coupled with a seven hour day. A trade day is a day of eight hours, it is true, but there are difficulties involved in instructing mLxed groups of cliildren which make a seven hour day in the classroom more exhausting than eight hours in the work shop of a dressmaking estab- lishment. Again, the emphasis at Gary on actual production is commendable, but sewing instruction is something more than learning to sew on buttons and hooks and eyes, and learning to mend and make simple gamicnts. AbiUty to do these things and to do them well is desir- able, but it is quite as important that children give attention to the kind and character of the garments required for different purposes, to the worth and quality 46 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS of different fabrics, to dyes, and to a multitude of other matters essential to the proper background for clothing a modern family. Owing to the lack of appropriate records, it was im- possible to determine the amount of sewing the children had had and to judge their accomplishments in the light of the amount of time given to their training. Observa- tions of the classroom work and inspection of garments yielded a few vivid impressions. In the first place, the standard of accomplishment is by no means high. In the lower grades this may be due to the fact that pupils with little or no prior experience often begin at once to make garments. Under these conditions a finished product of high quality could not be expected. Much of the work of the advanced pu- pils is also below standard. While it is true that trade work and school instruction differ, still, in so far as the processes are common, the home making standard should equal the trade standard. Gary certainly Judges its products more leniently than does the trade. Again, the instruction is hardly calculated to result in capacity to do independent work. Obviously, not much can be expected at the outset of children who begin their school work in sewing with garment making. The difficulty is that throughout the course the teachers are apt to do so much of the thinking that it is doubt- ful whether many pupils can, on completing their course, put a dress together by themselves. There are, to be sure, exceptions and for these the system is en- MERITS AND DEFECTS 47 titled to full credit. That is, there are students who sew skillfully and who cut and lit with sureness. On the whole, however, it remains true that suffi- cient drill is not given in the principles of garment making, nor is the power to think, as applied to sew- ing and garment construction, satisfactorily devel- oped. Finally, too little pressure is put on the students; as a result, they do not take their work seriously. A degree of inattention in the elementary grades is excusable, but in the high school grades, there should be e\ddence of concentration aiming at a dcfmite object. This was by no means commonly in evidence. A class supposed to start at 2:15 did not get down to work until 2:35. Of a group numbering 14, only nine were occupied. These were busy — three on underwear, one on an apron, an- other on a duck skirt, a sixth in making bloomers, a seventh embroidering a sofa cushion, an eighth, a center- piece, and the ninth was cutting out a dress. A monthly school paper had just been published and the remaining five members of the class were absorbed in looking through the issue and in discussing the same. The thread at a sewing machine broke. The pupil did not re-thread that machine but moved to another. At another time a group of girls came into the se\\Tng room and part of them went to work. The rest were absorbed in reading **The Tempest," which was to be performed that after- noon by the senior class. In sewing as in cooking, the experience of Gary shows 48 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS that mere practical ends — the cooking of the daily school luncheon or the making of needed garments — are not alone broadly or sufficiently educative. Training should aim to give the pupil an intelligent grasp of both subjects. The child must of course be able to cut, fit and sew; but she must also have an interest in fabrics, designs, uses, etc. The instruction must have a conscious, central aim; it must touch, now here, now there, the child's other studies and activities. A course can be conceived and executed in this spirit only if there is team play between instructors under proper supervision. At Gary, unfortunately, the single supervisor of manual work devotes himself almost entirely to the industrial work for boys. The household arts themselves require the full time of a supervisor. Not only is there need of a supervisor to stimulate and assist the teachers, but to exercise leadership in solving the perplexing problems surrounding the practical train- ing of girls, in experimenting with courses of study, or- ganization and methods, and in working out connections with other studies and especially with the home. The foregoing pages endeavor to depict with complete impartiality the actual instruction given in the Gary schools in household arts and the theory on which the in- struction is based. No effort has been made to extenuate defects; every effort has been made to do full justice. It remains, however, to be said that there is danger that such an account as has been given may mislead because MERITS AND DEFECTJj 49 it fails to give the reader a proper realization of the atti- tude and spirit of the Gary pupils. These pupils are happy and this is a point that cannot be ignored when an inventory is taken. In the writer's judgment, the hap- piness and spontaneity of the children are due to a variety of causes — to the flexibility of the schedule, to the develop- ment of special activities, to the absence of repressive rules, to the general feeling that the school exists for the child, not the child for the school. THE PUBLICATIONS OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD REPORTS: THE GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD: AN ACCOUNT OF ITS ACTIV- ITIES, 1902- I9I4. 254 PAGES. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD, I9I4-I915. 82 PACES. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD, 1915-1916. 86 PAGES. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD, I916-I9I7. 87 PAGES. STUDIES: PUBLIC EDUCATION IN MARYLAND, BY ABRAHAM FLEXNER AND FRANK P. BACHMAN. 2ND EDITION. I76 PAGES, WITH APPEN" DI.X. THE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, BY THOMAS H. BRIGGS.* COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY FINANCE, BY TREVOR ARNETT.* OCCASIONAL PAPERS: 1. THE COUNTRY SCHOOL OF TO-MORROW, BY FREDERICK T. GATES. 15 PAGES. 2. CHANGES NEEDED IN AMERICAN SECONDARY EDUCATION, BY CHARLES W. ELIOT. 29 PAGES. 3. A MODERN SCHOOL, BY ABRAHAM FLE.XNER. 2} PAGES. 4. THE FUNCTION AND NEEDS OF SCHOOLS OF EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES, BY EDWIN A. ALDERMAN. 31 PAGES, WITH APPENDI.X. 5. LATIN AND THE A. B. DEGREE, BY CHARLES W. ELIOT. 21 PAGES, WITH APPENDI.X. 6. THE WORTH OF ANCIENT LITERATURE TO THE MODERN WORLD, BY VISCOUNT BRYCE. 20 PAGES. * In Preparation. The REPORTS issued by the Board arc official accounts of its ac- tivities and expenditures. The STUDIELS represent work in the field of educational investigation and research which the Board has made possible by appropriations defraying all or part of the expense involved. The OCCASIONAL PAPERS arc essays on matters of current edu- cational discussion, presenting topics of immediate interest from vari- ous points of view. In issuing the STUDIES and OCCASIONAL PAPERS, the Board acts simply as publisher, assuming no responsibil- ity for the opinions of the authors. The publications of (he Board may be obtained on request LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 014 184 374 6