Qass. Book. \ "• '^•i iHE MISCHIEFS ^LEGISLATIVE CAUCUSESj EXPOSED IN AN £i®2DIEIE§^ TO THE PEOPLE OF CONNECTICUT. TRIT31BUIJ.. HARlTOit.D-: ■^•lu; . iN & soxs !'>;5 ']'/ ADDRESS. To all the real friends of the State of Connecticutf ofererij sect, denomination and party whatever : FELLOW CITIZEA^S, Feeling a deep interest in common with you in the peace and prosperity ot" this heretofore highly favoured community, I wish to address you on a suhject of more importance than any which has occurred since the formation of a government in our beloved state. I have chosen this period, because it appeared to my mind to be more favourable to cool reflection than any which might occur in the course of the year. We are now free from the excitement of an approaching election. The party in power have finished their work for this year ; and the severe shock which has been every where felt by their legislative results, has so far subsided, that our judg- ments can be safely trusted. Nor is there any thing in the politi- cal affairs of the nation calculated to awaken passion or the spirit of party. The measures of the general government are approved by all good citizens ; and while they evince wisdom and fidelity in our national councils, they excite neither jealousy, distrust nor clamor. The great questions which have so long and so unhappily divided public opinion, have been put at rest, by the general peace in Europe ; and harmony prevails to a degree unknown, since the establishment of the national government. In regard to our own State, the formation and adoption of the new Constitution has quieted the minds of those who wished for an enlargement of the right of suffrage, and for greater freedom in re- ligion. All male citizens above twenty-one years of age, may now vote at our elections : and the small nominal superiority which the Congregationalists had over the other denominations, arising solely from their being a majority, is now removed ; and all are placed on a perfect level. Whether these provisions are wise or unwise, and whether it was discreet to cause such clianges in our politic|i| insti- tutions, is not now to be questioned. All agree, that the Constitu- tion must be implicitly obeyed, as the supreme law of the land. 1 cannot imagine, therefore, a more favourable time for candid reflec- 4 tion on the past, and sobei- meditation on the future. I do not wisl^ to indulije in unprofitalile speculations on what has been done, and Vvhich cannot be recalled. Recrimination, and the mutual accusa- tions of partisans against their political adversaries, have produced great evils — they should never be indulged except when just; and also when necessary to influence our conduct in future. The en- quiry now should be, what course, under existing circumstances, does wisdom point out: and to give an enlightened answer to that question, a recurrence must be had to past events. In this point of view onlvj it is proper, and not only proper, but necessary to inquire into (he conduct of public men. Without such a scrutiny, we cannot learn whether they are entitled to our confi- dence and whether they may be trusted in future. Here, again 1 would remark, that a single mistake, or many mistakes, or eveu great errors, while the motives are pure, should be no ground for withdrawing our coniitlence fiom public men. To err is the lot ef humanity. Great and wise men are not exempt from this frailty of our natures. I come not, therefore, to speak to you of some unwise measures adopted by your rulers, from misapprehension or error. These might be corrected by the same men when better inform- ed, and entirely avoided in future. My message is of a different character. I covne to inform you that your interests have not been even consulted for the three last sessions of the General Assembly ; and that the foulest corruption has defiled the sanctuary of legisla- tion. It is no\Y more than three years since a combination was formed among the restless, ambitious and dissolute part of the community, to seize upon ail the public offices in the state, and apportion them among themselves. If this combination was in some measure tacit, it was nevertheless real and practical .> To promote its views, a standard was raised, called Toleration, and offices were unblush- ingly offered to all who would resort to it. Thus every office in the state, for three years past, has been in market, except those of Judges of tlie Superior Court and Supreme Court of Errors. It was falsely pretended that these were to' sacred^o be sported wit!i, or wantonly bartered away;^ and the strongest assurances were made, that they should remain sacred as (hey ought to have been ; yet these have been sold at auction to the highest bidder, and the present occupants have yielded as a con?id- '.^.ration, an entire adherence to this standard. To th:s rcDvark there is one honorable exception. His appointment, however, is well known to have been occasioned by the abortion of a monstrous cau- eus-arranho do notbe!on*to the General Assembly, attending there to inffuence appointments, than those who are members of that body. Yes, fellow citizens, strange and abiiorrent as it may appear to a pure mind, it is nevertheless true, that for the three las't sessions, it has been the constant practice of members|of the legisla- ture to hold meetings called caucusses, with any and all who see fit to assemble, from all parts of the state, of whatever character or standing, and without any other credentials than an assurance that they are prepared to go all lengths in turning out and jndting in. Here, too, as is usual in other assemblies, the minority is pledged to give way to the majority ; and every measure carried by a major vote in these meetings, is of course voted for by all wlio belong to this party in the legislature, v.hatevor may be their own private opin- ion regarding it. 6 Were these meetings composed of a portion of the legislature, in exclusion of the remainder, but without admitting others from abroad, they would be sufficiently alarming to excite the vigilant attention of every friend to. the state. Even in that case, it is per- fectly evident, that measures might be carried against the opinion of a decided majority of the legislature. A measure is adopted in caucus by a small majority — now if the minority, when the subject comes before the house, would act according to their opinions, their votes, when united with those who do not belong to this combina- tion, miglit defeat the measure. This, however, they will not do ; but in defiance of their " best judgment," and, when your interest and mine, and that of the state and posterity, and the solemn oath of God all require them so to act, they vote in direct opposition to their own convictions in obedience to the decisions of a caucus. What would the people thiak, if three out of the five judges of our Supreme Court, should enter into a combination to decide all cau- ses without consulting the other two ; and to tliis end, should retire by themselves to discuss and determine each cause, and having formed their opinion, shoulM call in the other two, to legalize the decision of a majority of the* three ? Is it not easy to perceive that in this mode, two out of five might controul the cause ? I know that these suppositions may seem extravagant, but let me tell you, fellow citizens, that unless this system of caucussing receive a seasonable check from you, some of us may live to see caucus judges as well as caucus legislators; nor is it more mon- strous or alarming in one case than in the other. There is nothing more sacred in the rights of parties to a suit in courts than in the rights i)f the public in legislative proceedings ; and the danger of extensive evils is far less, from corrupt decisions in private causes, than in public measures ; as judges are not supposed to have any interest in those causes : whereas, the sole object of these legis- lative caucusscs is, t!ie promotion of the interest of the members, in the appointment to office. But if these meetings would be so alarming when held by a portion of the legislature, wliat are we to think of tliem, when the worthless and abandoned are admitted to participate in their deliberations and decisions ? In this way it is evident, that as a majority of the caucus do not belong to the Assembly, a measure of vita! importance may be adopted against the conviction of every jnember of that body, In compliance with the decision of a caucus. And is it so ? That the people, instead of being called to yield obedience to regulations made by their representatives duly chosen, are compelled to sub- mit to the will of a caucuf, composed of the ambitious, the restless and the proflieiate ? But again, asthese caucussesare unauthorized byany laworusage, and as there is no regular mode of convening them, there is room for the practice of the most gross fraud upon eacli other. Hence it has happened that in the case of appointing candidates, both belonging .to the favoured party, and both having friends who would attend a caucus, one of them warns a meeting, giving no notice to the oppo- sing candidate or his friends, and thus secures a major vote in cau- cus, and ultimately an appointment in the legislature. This combination, by these means, in a little more than three years, has reduced our state from the highest point of elevation, to the lowest point of depression. In the general government we have uniformly furnished the House of Representatives with gen- tlemen of the first talents, of unquestioned integrity, and who, by their political opponents, have been acknowledged to be the safest guardians of the public treasure, and on this interesting subject, have had their full share of influence. In the places of such men, wht) will be found in the next House of Representatives } I will not undertake the disgusting task of analyzing their characters, and of holding them up in contrast with those of their distino-uish- ed predecessors ; but 1 will ask you to turn your attention to the men individually, and enquire what have been their private char- acters ? (For public characters they have not sustainad.) What standing and rank have they held in their vaiious professions and employments ^ What have their neighbors thought of their capacity and integrity .^ Wlio has confided to them his own private con- cerns .'' In the Senate of the United States, a gentleman of a known pub- lic character, who, through a long course of public service, to which he was called. in early life, has sustained the reputation of undevi- ating integrity and firmness, and who has been no less distinguish- ed for brilliancy than solidity^f talents, ha« been superceded, to make room for the election ofone signalized for nothing but pomp^. froth and noise at the bar. 8 Your judiciary? fellow citizens, where is it ? A few years since ic was your pride ; it \v«* the admiration of your surrounding neighlvors -^where is it novv ? Amidst all the professions of the present ruling party, that this sanctuary should, in all evCTits, be held inviolate, and by which some of you have been enticed and allured to aid them in then- iniquitous course, whore is it now? I need not say, that the honour of our state is prostrate ; and that Vve are humbled in the dust. As to the character of those judges who have been removed from the Superior Court and Supreme Court of Errors, it is unnecessary to speak particularly: they are personally known to many of you, and tiieir chaiacters are known to you all. Having very soon dis- tinguished them'selves at the bar, they were early promoted by the unbiassed suftVages of the freemen, to some of the highest offices in the gift of the people ; and this, too, when such a thing as a caucus, or a ticket was unknown in this state; but when every freeman was Si freeman indof d, and gave his vote according to the dictates of hJD conscience and judgment. Will it be said, that the public has gained any thing by superior- ity of qualifications in the new judges over their^ predecessors .►* If so, T ask you to go with me to the seats of justice in the various coun- ties, and call to mind the patience of investigation, tlie soundness of judgment, and the stern integrity which you have there witnessed : If this does not satisfy you, go back to the. bar and there enquire who held the superior rank } Tiiey have, in some instances, practi-* sed in the same courts — been concerned in the same causes ; and a comparison can easily be made. If any of you are so far under the influence of the excitement of party, as to be unable to view things in their true light, I pray you to go back with me three or four years, and ask yourselves what would have been your sensa- tions, had you been told that Judge Swift, Trumbull, Edmond, Smith, Baldwin, Goddard and Gould, were all to be removed to make room for John T. Peters, Asa Chapman and William Bristol, Esquires ? Of the judges tluis sacrificed by thfe combination of which I have spoken, it may truly be ^aid, thattltifcunitedly possessed qualifica- tions and talents rarely witnessed in tne same number of men. Who in Connecticut is ignorant of the high attainments in science and literature, of the profound knowledge of la«r» of the native vigor 9 aiul deep penetration of mind, and of tiie ijuyieidii!;; it.togrity late- ly so conspicuous on the seat of judgment ? Will it be said that the new judges have superior chtims, aside from pel sonal qualifications ? If so, I would enquire on what tliose claims are founded ? Does the fact that the former judges when ap- pointed to the bench, left very extensive and lucrative business, and resigned it to those mIio are rising into notice, atVurd any such claim ? Or can it be found in the fact that tlie office of judge has been considered so permanent that these gentlemen might entertain an entire confidence that, leaving profitable employments for seats on the beuc!i,thej would be continued in office during good behav- iour ? The reason of this procedure cannot be found in the ordinarif operations of parUj sph-it, but must be sought after in the still dai k- er and more gloomy regions to which I have just directed your at- tention. Is it not well known that our late judges iiave taken no part in political controversy ^ When called to exercise tlieir rights as citizens and as freemen, they have followed the dictates of their ovv^n consciences, without taking any pains to influence others ; and in the great questions which have agitated the political world for years past, as they have not been called on to act officially, their opinions have been scarcely known. Conscious, that not only a strict impartiality, but freedom from even the suspicion of a contra- ry disposition, was of the first importance in a judge, they have, as it is well understood, kept their feelings equally balanced between the conflicting parties, and the consequences have been, that the most zealous partizans of each party, have had equal confidence in their decisions; nor has a whisper of complaint of partiality beers heard from any quarter. Two of these gentlemen, have, indeed., been frequently charged with treason ; and their names have beeti held up to public execration as traitors, for no other reason, than that they performed with fidelity, an important public trust con- ferred on them by the supreme power of the State. It is well known that neither of them had any agency in originating or con- stituting the New-England Convention, nor had they been in situ- ations to act on the subjects, or agitate the points which led to it. They were therefore selected as the safest guardians of the public interest, with unlimited powers to act as their consciences should dictate. The period, all agree, Mas oxtrcmoly interesting and crit- 10 ;cai. Had these gentlemen refused to accept the trust, and exert all their powers for the welfare of the community, they would have deserved all the censure and ^buse which they have received for doing what every man will, on sober reflection, say, was their un= doubted duty. It is also to be remembered, that the loudest clam- our on this subject, has been made by those time-serving politicians who are bold and noisy in favor of measures dictated by the major- ity, but who shrink from duty when their idol, popularity, would be put in jeopardv. It is not to be concealed, that many of those, now the favorites of the mischievous combination, whose deadly influence I mean to expose, were the most engaged in the formation of that convention, but who now, with dastardly meanness, join in the slander uttered against the excellent men who composed it. In regard to sheriffs, judges of courts of common pleas, justices of quorum, judges of probate, justices of peace, clerks of courts, and even down to commissioners of turnpike roads, there has been one sweep of removal, with few exceptions arising out of particular cir- cumstances. And what have these public servants done that they should be thus treated ? Or rather, what have you done, my fellow citizens, that you should be deprived of the integrity and talents of these tried and faithful officers ? That any of them have been negligent in duty, or unworthy of public confidence, no one asserts, or is har- dy enough to suspect. They were originally selected from the body of the people, and appointed to these offices because by educa- tion, habits and character, they were fitted for the discharge of the duties of them. These duties had become familiar to them, and their usefulness to the community was much enhanced by their ex- perience. These offices have now been filled with those who were most zealous formerly in the federal ranks, but who did not possess the confidence of that party so as to entitle them to office ; or by other restless and impassioned young men. And is it come to this ? That in the enlightened state of Connecticut, such qualities should secure public favor ?. Neither with the democrats of the old school, nor with the tole- rationists, as such, have 1 any contest. Of the former, many earlj- vievved the first administrations of the General Government, and the men in power in this State, who approbated the measures of those administrations, with an eye of suspicion, if not of distrust. 11 They thought that there was an attempt to tiepait from the princi- ples which conducted us tlirough the war of the revolution, and a tendency to imitate governments founded on the principles of roy- alty or aristocracy, and all their prejudices and fears, were, of course, alarmed. Men, who have since evinced their entire want of principle, lahored to fan the flame of discord to promote tlicir own amhitious views, and were but too successful. Those times have passed away, and every sober man, on a careful review of the con- tentions which existed, and which so unhappily distracted our country, sees, in the conduct of each of the great patties, mucli to regret. A recurrence to these scenes now, would be worse than useless, if the object were only to censure or applaud men and measures which yve then condemned or approved ; siili it is proper to regard them as exhibitions of the fury with which upright citi- zens may assail each other, one day, and on the next, unite in prin- ciple and practice. I have said, that, with the tolerationists, merely as such, I feel no disposition to contend. As to those of them who have joined a foul combination to seize on all the offices and apportion them among those yvho will rally around their unhallowed standard, they have my most hearty contempt; as, I am sure they soon will, that of every honest man in the community. Such wretched office-seekers cannot maintain an elevated standing with honorable men : their popularity will soon decay. They may now regale themselves un- der the shadow of the gourd which "sprang up in the night," but it will wither also " in a night," and they will faint under the indig- nation of an insulted community. As to those of this party who verily thought that a partial reform in our political condition yvas necessary — that some intolerance was cherished, and that certain men were not sufficiently liberal in their views, without deciding on the correctn^s of their opinions, I come not to censure them. These men little thought that consequences such as we have seen, would follow. It was no part of their design to drive from the temple of justice such men as Swift and Smith, nor to deprive Ed- mond, as upright a judge as ever lived, at the age of sixty, of the means of support. These gentlemen, for nearly twenty years, had sustained their dignified stations with honor to themselves, and with the iiighest benefit to the state ; and the latter gentleman had sealed his love of countrv hv shpddin"; his blood in her ficfence. 12 wiiile n.ost of those men who have driven nitn from his seat were in their ciacllcs. His wouiuls still remain ; and they are damning proofs of (he wickedness of a combination which has aimed another dauicrer at his vitals. I repeat, with neither of these descriptions of men am I conten- ding : 1 mean to expose to public view, the restless, ambitious and unprincipled, distinct from either of these.classes but who have availed themselves of all the prejudices of both. I have never, for a moment, doubted, but that there were many,