J' ^^-.- "^^■' i^°^ ^^0^ :^m^^' '^h^^ r-'^^i^'": '•*u..^< «*lo*. '"'* xS'^ <* *'TVr* .0* "^^ 'O..V - Jack Tier. Wing and Wing. '" " The Sea Lions. Wyandotte. Oak Openings. Afloat and Ashore. The Ways of the Hour. Each 'Volume sold separately. Price in extra cloth, per volume $ 3 00 " " cloth, elegant, in sets only 96 00 " " half calf, gilt or antique, the set 144 00 HOUSEHOLD EDITION. Printed on fine white paper, and handsomely bound. In thirty-two volumes, i6mo. Price in extra cloth, per volume $ i 25 *' '< *' '< the set 4000 ,".."• half calf, the set 8000 The Leather-Stocking Tales, five volumes, comprising : — Deerslayer. Prairie. Pioneers. Pathfinder. Last of the Mohicans. Illustrated Edition, cloth, elegant $15 00 half calf, gilt or antique 22 50 People's Edition, extra cloth 8 75 Household Edition, extra cloth 6 25 HURD AND HOUGHTON, Publishers, 459 Broome Street^ Neiv York, SHAKESPEARE'S -y' TRAGEDY OF /^ MACBETH AS PRODUCED BY EDWIN BOOTH Adapted from the Text of the Cambridge Editors, witli Introductory Remarks, v9*c.. By henry L. HINTON. NEW YORK: PUBLISHED BY HURD & HOUGHTON, 459 BROOME STREET. Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1868, By henry L. HINTON, In the Clerk's Office of the Distrid Court of the United States for the Southern Distri(5t of New York. INTRODUCTION. No play has called forth a greater variety of opinions than Macbeth. It has been charaderized, on the one hand, ' as the grandest conception of human genius.' On the other, the learned Dr. Johnson says, 'it has no nice discriminations of charadler ;' he adds, ' a poet who should now make the whole adion of his drama depend on enchantment, and produce the chief events by the assistance of supernatural agents, would be cen- sured as transgressing the bounds of probability, and be banished from the theatre to the nursery.' Dr. Warburton vents himself on what he calls the ' extravagances ' of the witch scenes, but he condescendingly remarks that ' the play has had the power to charm and bewitch every audience from that to this time.' It is to more recent authors that we must look for a just estimate of this wonderful produdion. Coleridge, Schlegel, Hazliit, Gervinus, and other great critics have eulogized not only the force and intensity in the poetic elaboration, but the exquisite art in the construftion of this play. The remarks of these great masters are, however, too much extend- ed for quotation here. The following elegant extract from Grant White best serves our purpose as a condensed statement of the spirit of the piece : — * What the Sistine Madonna was to Raffael, it seem.s that Macbeth was to Shakespeare— a magnificent impromptu ; that kind of impromptu which results from the application of well-disciplined powers and rich stores of thought to a subje6l suggested by occasion. I am inclined to regard Mac- beth as, for the most part, a specimen of Shakespeare's unelaborated, if not unfinished, writings, in the maturity and highest vitality of his genius. It abounds in instances of extremest compression and most daring ellipses, while it exhibits in every scene a union of supreme dramatic and poetic power, and in almost every line an imperially irresponsible control of languiig:.' As regards the history of the play, it is positively ascertained that it was written between the years 1603 and 1610; probably 1605 was the year of its authorship and produdlion on the stage. Richard Burbadge has the honor of originally personating the hero, but no account of his acting in th's rd't iv INTRODUCTION. has been preserved. He was the most distinguished tragedian of his time, and from the amount of eulogy bestowed upon him by a people who must have had a line sense of what was great in the a6lor's art, we are inclined to think he has never been surpassed. In 1665 Sir William Davenant produced a new version o^ Macbeth , and from that day to this, more or less of his vile interpolations have been in- serted in the various ading editions of the play. What this version of Davenant's was, may be described in the words of Davies, who wrote nearly a century later: — ^ After Macbeth had been thrown aside, or negleded for some years. Sir William Davenant undertook to refine and reduce it, as near as possible, to the standard of the taste in vogue. He likewise brought it, as well as he could, to the resemblance of an opera. In the musical part he was assisted by Mr. Locke, an eminent master of music. It must be confessed, the songs of Hecate, and the other witches, have a solemn adaption to the beings for whom they were composed. Dances of furies were invented for the incantation scene in the fourth a6l, and near fifty years since I saw our best dancers employed in the exhibition of infernal spirits. Had Davenant stopped here, it had been well for his reputation, but this ill-instru£led admirer of Shakespeare altered the plan of the au- thor's design, and destroyed that peculiarity which distinguishes Macbeth from several of our author's pieces. The jingle of rhyme delighted the ears of our court critics, for no other reason, which I can discover, but because the plays of the French nation, and especially their tragedies, wore the chiming fetters ; but the dramatic poets of France knew that their language was too weak for blank verse, or for lines of twelve feet, without the assistance of rhyme, and therefore, what was mere necessity in them, the false judges of our language considered as an essential beauty.' The following extradl from the same writer will give the reader a knowledge of the advance made by Garrick toward a more faithful presentation of the play : * Happily for the lovers of Shakespeare, Mr. Garrick, some years before he was a patentee, broke through the fetters of foolish custom and arbitrary imposition : he restored Macbeth to the public almost in the same dress it was left us in, by the author. A scene or two, which were not conducive to the adlion, he threw out in representation ; others that were too long he judiciously pruned; very few additions were made, except in some passages of the play necessary to the better expla- nation of the writer's intention. He composed, indeed, a pretty long speech for Macbeth, when dying, which, though suitable perhaps to the INTRODUCTION. v character, was unlike Shakespeare's manner, who was not prodigal of be- stowing abundance of matter on charaders in that situation. But Garrick excelled in the expression of convulsive throes and dying agonies, and would not loose any opportunity that offered to show his skill in that part of his profession.' John Kemble, who was one of the greatest Macbeth* of these more modern times, had the good taste to omit Garrick's dying speech, and, we believe, it has since been rarely if ever introduced. But Davenant's mingling of Middleton's witches with those of Shakespeare's in this play, still, it is to be regretted, hold favor with most of our a6lors and managers. The charader of Macbeth has been less satisfadorily portrayed than, perhaps, any of our author's heroes. Davies, whom we have quoted above, in speaking of the distinguished a6lors of his time who essayed the role of Macbeth, says : — * Quin's figure and countenance, in this character, spoke much in his favor ; but he was deficient in animated utterance, and wanted flexibility of tone. He could neither assume the strong agitation of mind before the murder of the king, nor the remorse and anguish in consequence of it : much less could he put on that mixture of despair, rage, and frenzy, that mark the last scenes of Macbeth. During the whole representation he scarce ever deviated from a dull, heavy monotony. Mossop's power of expression, in several situations of Macbeth^ commanded attention and applause. Had he been acquainted with variety of adlion and easy deport- ment, he would have been justly admired in it. Barry ought never to have attempted that which was so opposite to his natural manner. He was not formed to represent the terrible agonies of Macbeth. The genius of a Garrick could alone comprehend and execute the complicated passions of this charadler. From the first scene, in which he was accosted by the witches, to the end of the part, he was animated and consistent. The tumult raised in his mind by the prophecy of the witches was expressed by feelings suitable to the occasion, nor did he suffer the marks of this agitation to be entirely dissipated in the presence of Duncan, which he discovered to the audience in no obscure manner; more especially when the king named Malcolm, Prince of Cumberland.' Of Garrick, and Mrs. Pritchard, as Macbeth and Lady Macbeth in the murder scene in the second ad, the same writer remarks : — * The represen- tation of this terrible part of the play, by Garrick and Mrs. Pritchard, can no more be described than I believe it can be equaled. I will not sepa- rate these performers, for the merits of both were transcendent. His distradlion of mind and agonizing horrors were finely contrasted by her vi INTRODUCTION. seeming apathy, tranquillity, and confidence. The beginning of the scene after the murder, was condu6led in terrifying whispers. Their looks and adions supplied the place of words. You heard what they spoke, but you learned more from the agitation of mind displayed in their a61ions and de- portment. The poet here gives only an outline to the consummate actor : "I have done the deed!" '^ Didst thou not hear a noise?" '^When?" ^' Did you not speak ?" The dark coloring, given by the aftor to these abrupt speeches, makes the scene awful and tremendous to the auditor ! The wonderful expression of heartful horror, which Garrick felt w^hen he showed his bloody hands, can only be conceived and described by those who saw him!' The banquet scene in the third acr, is the scene, perhaps, of all other where most Macbeths and Lady Macbeths fail. ' This admirable scene/ as Davies tells us, * was greatly supported by the speaking terrors of Garrick's look and aftion. Mrs. Pritchard showed admirable art in endeav- oring to hide Pvlacbeth's frenzy from the observation of the guests, by draw- ing their attention to conviviality. She smiled on one, w^hispered to another, and distantly saluted a third ; in short, she prafticed every possible artifice to hide the transadion that passed betv/een her husband and the vision his disturbed imagination had raised. Her reproving and angry looks, v/hich glanced toward Macbeth, at the same time were mixed with marks of inward vexation and uneasiness. When, at last, as if unable to support her feelings any longer, she rose from her seat, and seized his arm, and, with a half-whisper of terror, said — ** Are you a man 1" she assumed a look of such anger, indignation, and contempt, as can not be surpassed/ Notwithstanding all that Davies has said of Mrs. Pritchard's Lady Mac- beth, yet her successor, Mrs. Siddons, seems to have excited far greater en- thusiasm. *Mrs. Siddons,' as Doran tells us, * imagined the heroine of this most tragic of tragedies to be a delicate blonde, who ruled by her intelledl, and subdued by her beauty, but with whom no one feeling of common general nature was congenial ; a woman prompt for wickedness, but swiftly possessed by remorse ; one who is horror-stricken for herself and for the^ precious husband, who, more robust and less sensitive, plunges deeper into crime, and is less moved by any sense of compassion or sorrow.' Of the comparative excellencies of the chief impersonators since Gar- rick's time of the rdle of Macbeth, the following extrad from Mr. Gould's recent work. The Tragedian,* embodies a clearly denned estimate, evinc- ing a master hand in the difficult art of Shakespearean criticism : — * Published by Hurd & Houghton, INTR OD UCTION. vii ' Mr. Booth filled this part. We had seen gracious performances, and heard musical readings of the text by other adors. They reported the charader. Booth was possessed by it. A captain in the service of his king, and returning from successful fight, in company with Banquo, he is met upon a blasted heath by the three witches. The preternatural gran- deur, and significant brevity, of their greeting, are usually lost upon the stage. And this, we contend, is owing quite as much to the incapacity of imagination on the part of the performer of Macbeth, as to the fantastical, half-comic aspe6l of the three old women. While they were speaking, Mn Booth betrayed his strong inward agitation ; and when they vanished (that is, clattered off the stage), he looked at them, then into the air, with a quick and wonder-struck transition, which volatilized their substance, and abolished their defe6l.' We must illustrate this scene by a comparison: — Banquo. " The earth hath bubbles, as the water has, And these are of them. Whither are they vanished ?" Macbeth, "Into the airj and what seemed corporal melted As breath into the wind." Mr. Vandenhoff, the elder, a gentleman whose readings from Shake- speare and other poets delighted large audiences in this country some twenty years since, had a voice singularly sweet and sonorous. We saw him adl Macbeth, or rather heard him read the part ; for his adlion was always secondary. His delivery of the passage quoted, was a marvel of descriptive intonation. He gave body and form to the impalpable air. You could almost see his breath in it. But he did not give the vanishing. Booth did. With a sudden upward look, and with a sudden springing tone, not musical, but like the whiz of a shaft from a cross-bow, he gave, *'into the air.'^ Could he dally with the image? No. Voice, look, adion, conveyed the instant thought, the vanishing. And the conclusion of the sentence came in the same style : — ** And what seemed corporal " {looking at his ozun body)^ ** Melted as breath into the ivind '* {short i ), with a succession of emphasis, swift, and filled with wonder. To assign the method of various adlors, we might say : Vandenhoff played the imagery ; Macready, the analysis ; Kean, the passion of the scene ; Booth, the charader, which not only includes the other methods, but supplies an element wanting in them. The speech beginning, " Two truths are told," drew upon that well-spring of imaginative expression, which lay deep in Booth's nature, and which Macbeth gave scope for, in a more condensed viii INTRODUCTION. and terrific way, than any other charader. The efFedl of the ^* supernatu- ral soHciting " was to kindle this quality into its highest life. No voice that we have ever heard or read of^ could convey like his, the embodied beauty or terror of supernatural emotions. The music of the ** imperial theme " was in his ears. He saw the throne in vision, but between him and it were darkness, fearfiil guilt, and '^horrible imaginings.'* ** My thought, ivhose murder — yet — is but fantastical {^^with tone and gesture that Jjgured a hovering and 'vanishing shape)^ Shakes so my single state of man (w/M 'vibrant intensity)^ that fundtion Is smothered in surmise, and nothing is But what is not.** This phrase was uttered in one continuous tone of involved resonance, and in such a manner as to make the listener feel that the thronging shapes of Macbeth's roused and guilty imagination had displaced the world of objedlive realities. . . . During the alarm at the discovery of the mur- der of the king, Macbeth goes to Duncan's chamber and returns, siaying — "Had I but died an hour before this chance, I had lived a blessed time," etc. While delivering this speech, and the following one, wherein he justifies himself for the added murder of the grooms, an intelligent reporter for the press happened to enter the theatre. " That 's not good," he exclaimed. '^ What 's the matter with Booth to-night ?" Nothing was the matter, except that the ador had reached the height of the histrionic art, and was speaking Macbeth'sy^/j^ sentiments with pretended feeling. He delivered the forced imagery, in the affedled manner of a hired mourner, hired by '^ the common enemy of man," and paid — a crown. ^Hazlitt says of Kean's Macbeth, that '^he was deficient in the poetry of the charadler ;" and that *^ he did not look like a man who had encoun- tered the Weird Sisters." How then, we may ask, could he play the part at all ? For, unless we are made to feel that the ador is possessed by visions of the mind, startled by voices in the air, waylaid, and drawn on to his confusion by those — " Secret, black, and midnight hags,'* it becomes of little account that he gives, as Kean did, one heart-rending pidure of remorse, after the commission of a murder. This might be done without representing Macbeth. Booth's performance, on the con- trary, was constituted by imagination, kindled and swayed by supernatural agencies ' So close was Mr. Booth's identification of charader that its transpira- INTRODUCTION. ix tions were manifest, in minor and unconsidered ways. We may instance as contrasted examples the different modes of fighting and dying, in Rich- ard and in Macbeth. The circumstances are externally similar. In each play a brave and guilty king dies in single combat, either with the rightful heir to the throne, or his representative, after suffering a supernatural and prophetic visitation. But how different is the soul of the respedive scenes. In Richard, the vision of the night has passed like a forgotten dream. In the battle — " A thousand hearts are swelling in his bosom." His kingdom is still at stake. The hope of vi6lory lives in the fast em- brace of his enormous and tenacious will, and never leaves him till the last blow is struck. Accordingly, Booth as Richard, seemed — "Treble sinewed, hearted, breathed. And fought maliciously," while in Macbeth, he flung out voice and a6tion with the desperate aban- donment of a brave soldier, consciously meeting a preternatural doom.' COSTUME. Garrick dressed Macbeth as a complete modern Scottish sergeant-major, while Macklin donned a costume of a semi-military charader. Mrs. Pritchard, as Lady Macbeth, appeared in a ' court skirt over huge hoops, and a train tucked up to the waist, with powdered hair surmounted by a forest of feathers ;' and Mrs. Crouch personated one of the witches ' in a killing fancy hat, her hair superbly powdered, rouge laid on with delicate effedl, and her whole exquisite person enveloped in a cloud of point lace and fine linen.' Since such masquerade chara6lerizations are no longer endured, the question has arisen as to what is the proper costume for Mac- beth, Charles Knight, in his Shakespeare, offers a good argument on this much contested subjedl, of which the following is an abstra^l : — The rudely-sculptured monuments and crosses which time has spared upon the hills and heaths of Scotland, however interesting to the antiquary in other respe£ls, afford but very slender and uncertain information respect- ing the dress and arms of the Scotch Highlanders in the eleventh century ; and attempt how we will to decide from written documents, a hundred pens will instantly be flourished against us. Our own opinion, however, formed long ago, has, within these few years, been confirmed by that of 1* X INrRODUCTION. the historian, W. F. Skene, who says : * it would be too much, perhaps, to affirm that the dress, as at present worn, in all its minute details, is ancient ; but it is very certain that it is compounded of three varieties in the form of dress, which were separately worn by the Highlanders in the seventeenth century, and that each of these may be traced back to the remotest antiquity.' These are : 1st, The belted plaid; 2d, The short coat or jacket; 3d, The truis. With each of these, or, at any rate, with the first two, was worn, from the earliest periods to the seventeenth century, the long-sleeved, saiFron-stained shirt, of Irish origin, called the Leni-croich. Nicolay d'Arfeville in 1583, says: * They wear, hke the Irish, a large full shirt, colored with saiFron, and over this a garment hanging to the knee, of thick wool, after the manner of a cassock (soutane). They go with bare heads, and allow their hair to grow very long, and they wear neither stockings nor shoes, except some who have buskins (botines) made in a very old fashion, v/hich come as high as the knees.' Lesley, in 1578, says : ' all, both nobles and common people, wore mantles of one sort (except that the nobles preferred those of different colors) ; these were long and flowing, but capable of being gathered up at pleasure into folds. The rest of their garments consisted of a shorty woolen jacket, with the sleeves open below, for the convenience of throwing their darts, and a cover- ing for the thighs of the simplest kind, more for decency than for show or defense against cold. They made also of linen very large shirts, with numerous folds and very large sleeves, which flowed loosely over their knees. These the rich colored with saffron, and others smeared with some grease, to preserve them longer clean among the toils and exercises of a camp, &c. Here we have the second variety — that of the short, woolen jacket with the open sleeves. The third variety is the truis, or trowse, * the breeches and stockings of one piece.' The truis has hitherto been traced in Scotland only as far back as the year 1538 ; and there are many who deny its having formed a portion of the more ancient Scottish dress : but inde- pendently that the document of the date above-mentioned recognizes it as an established ' Highland ' garment at the time, thereby giving one a right to infer its having long previously existed, the incontrovertible fa6l of a similar article of apparel having been worn by all the chiefs of the other tribes of the great Celtic or Gaelic family is sufficient, in our minds, to give probability to the belief that it was also worn by those of the ancient Scotch Highlanders. With regard to another hotly-disputed point of Scottish costume, the colors of the checkered cloth, commonly called tartan and plaid INTRODUCTION. xi (^neither of which names, however, originally signified its variegated appear- ance, the former being nearly the name of the woolen stuif of which it was made, and the latter that of the garment into which it was shaped), the most general behef is, that the distin6\ion of the clans by a particular pattern is of comparatively a recent date ; but those who deny ' a coat of many colors' to the ancient Scottish Highlanders altogether, must as un- ceremoniously strip the Celtic Briton or Belgic Gaul of his tunic, * flowered with various colors in divisions,' in which he has been specifically arrayed by Diodorus Siculus. In Major's time (1512) the plaids or cloaks of the higher classes alone were variegated. The common people appear to have worn them generally of a brown color, ^ most near,' says Moniepennie, * to the color of the hadder' (heather). Martin, in 1716, speaking of the female attire of the Western Isles, says the ancient dress, which is yet worn by some of the vulgar, called arisad, is a white plaid, having a few small stripes of black, blue, and red. Defoe, in his ^ Memoirs of a Cavalier,' describes the plaid worn in 1639 as * striped across, red and yellow,' and the portrait of Lacy, the adlor, painted in Charles II. 's time, represents him dressed for Sawney, the Scot, in a red, yellow, and black tunic and belted plaid, or, at any rate, in stuff of the natural yellowish tint of the wool, striped across with black and red. For the armor and weapons of the Scotch of the eleventh century v/e have rather more distinct authority. The sovereign and his Lowland chiefs appear early to have assumed the shirt of ring-mail of the Saxon ; or, per- haps, the quilted panzar of their Norwegian and Danish invaders ; hut that some of the Highland chieftains disdained such defense must be ad- mitted, from the well-known boast of the Earl of Strathearne, as late as 1138, at the battle of the Standard : *I wear no armor,' exclaimed the heroic Gael, * yet those who do will pot advance beyond me this day.' It was indeed the old Celtic fashion for soldiers to divest themselves of al- most every portion of covering on the eve of combat, and to rush into battle nearly, if not entirely naked. The Scottish female habit seems to have consisted, hke that of the Saxon, Norman, and Danish women — nay, we may even add the ancient British — of a long robe, girdled round the waist, and a full and flowing mantle, fastened on the breast by a large buckle or brooch of brass, silver, or gold, and set with common crystals, or precious gems, according to the rank of the wearer. Dio describes Boadicea as wearing a variegated robe. DRAMATIS PERSONS Of this adaptation of Macbeth as cast for its first representation at Booth^s Theatre, New York, . Duncan, king of Scotland Malcolm, -i c DONALBAIN,/'''' '°"=--i Banquo, ' } S^^^'^^' °^ '^^ ^^^S^' ^'"^y- i .V.V.'. V.'.V* .,,. — Macduff, Lennox, Ross, Menteith, Angus, Caithness, Fleance, son to Banquo - SiWARD, earl of Northumberland, general of the English forces.- Young SiWARD, his son - Seyton, an officer attending on Macbeth - A Doftor A Messenger A Sergeant A Servant A Porter First Murderer An Old Man Second Murderer An Attendant noblemen of Scotland. ^ Lady Macbeth Gentlewoman attending on Lady Macbeth Hecate First Witch First Apparition.. . Second Witch '— Second Apparition. Third Witch Third Apparition . . Lords, Gentlemen, Officers, Soldiers, Attendants, &c. Scene : Scotland : England, Note* — The asterisks that occasionally appear in the text refer to the glossary. THE TRAGEDY OF MACBETH. ACT I. Scene I. A desert place. Thunder and lightning. Enter three Witches. First Witch. When shall we three meet again In thunder, lightning, or in rain ? Sec. Witch. When the hurlyburly's done, When the battle's lost and won. Third Witch. That will be ere the set of sun. First Witch. Where the place ? Sec. Witch. Upon the heath. Third Witch. There to meet with Macbeth. First Witch. I come, Graymalkin."^ All. Paddock"^ calls : — anon ! Fair is foul, and foul is fair. Hover through the fog and filthy air. \_Exeunt. Scene II. A camp near Forres. Alarum within. £w/