. < ENGLISH ANCESTRY OF MARGARET BARST , WIPE FIRST, 0? SIMON HUNTINGTON WHO DIED ON THE PASSAGE TO NEW ENGLAND IN 1633, AND SECONDLY OF LIEUT. THOMAS ST OUGHT ON OF DORCHESTER, MASS., IN 1630, AND OF WIND- SOR, CONN. , IN 163b, BY GEORGE SnEPARD PORTER, NORWICH, CONN., 1906. - t COPYRIGHT, 1906, 3Y GEORGE SHEPARD ^ORTER. All rights r eser ved. ARMS OF BARET: Arras: Argent, a bend azure, between three buckles lo-engy gules. Crest: On a helmet two ostrich feathers, the one or, the other a! gent . li. The arms of the Baret family of Westhall at tne visitation of ouffolk in 1561, were as described on the preceding page. At the Visitation of Norfolk in 1664, these, with the addition of a crest, were borne by Thomas Baret of Norwich, + -ne then representative of the family, and a brother of Mrs. Margaret (Baret) (Huntington J St ought on. A similar snield, excepting that the bend is super-imposed over one of tne buckles, appears upon the tomb of John Baret in the church of St. Mary, in Bury St. Edmunds. This is doubtless the monui.ient referred to by Thomas 3aret in his statement to Sir Edward Bysshe in 1671. The line of descent, however, is not, as yet, pos- itively determined. Ill . BARET, BARRET, BARET T , BARRETT. DIRECT PEDIGREE: 1. John Baret married Joan . 2. William Baret married Margaret Love. 3. William Baret married (2 J, Mrs. Margaret ( Pety shall ) Wing' field. 4. Christopher Baret married Elizabeth Clarke. 5. Margaret Baret married (I), Simon Huntington, and (2), Lieut. Thomas St ought on. I. JOHN BARET of Ely thbo rough, county Suffolk, England, gen- tleman, who lived in the time from about Kings Henry VI to Henry VIII, married Joan, whose maiden name is unknown, by whom he had two sons and one daughter. He was a devisee of Geoff re.? 3aret of Halesworth, in 1483 and of Margaret Koo in I4y8. John Baret died in the year I0I6, as nib will of IblO was proved by his son William, March 10th, the former year. The fol- lowing is an abstract of that instrument: John Barrett of Blythborough, in the count ie of Suffolke. My soul to God & my body to be buried in tne Church of the 31essed Trinity of Blythborough, by S Anne on the north side. d s To the High Altar ii.j iii.j . To tne Cathedral Church of Norwich xx . Legacies to the churches of Walberswick, Easton and Westleton. To buy a pair of silver candlesticks for Blythborough Church 1 :65. Owen married one Christian Randall by whom he had s e e one sonn, 2 daught : y sonn dyed yoimg: y daughters left issue, but can gi^e noe accompt of them. 12. Christopher, beeing very young when his f father dyed, was by his mother Margaret (whoe afterwards mar- ried to Aid. Suckling of Norw c t brought to iiorw c a by his f father in Law Suckling bound out an Appren- tice to London at y age of 12 years for 12 yeares service; after y expiration of his service he c h e & seated him selfe in Norw x married Elizabeth y daughter x sole heiress of Allen Clarke a Gentleman of Hebberstow or Hemmerston in Lyncolnshire by whome :.e had male ibsue Cnristop his Eldest Sonn (whoe dyed a single pson), William, Thomas, Peter & Robert, be- sides severall otner Children both male x female y dyed issueless, except only Margaret v«hoe married to one Symond Huntington whoe carried her to Mew Eng- land & had b eve rail Children by her, but wee can give rioe accompt of ner or them, yet think y shee x sev- erall Cnildren are Living tnere. William y bOnn of Cnristopn married to Martha y e daugnter of ------ Morris of Bristow <£ by her had sev- erall Children: all dyed isules but Christopher whoe is yet a single man x Peter who married Jane y e daughter of Thornton a minister in Northfolke x by her hath two sonns, Thomas _c William, both very young. Thomas y .5 sonn of Chribtoph Baret married Saran 15. e v y daughter of ffrancis Cock Esq* by wnora :.e hath had severall Children both sonns and daughters: all dyed issueless, Butt Thomas ^c Elizabeth. Thomas married r Hester daughter of John Mann Esq by whome ne hath had two Children, John k Sarah, but botn dyed very young. Elizabeth married to William Rayley 2 sonn to John r Rayley Esq by whome she hath now Living foure sonns, John, Thomas, William & Augustine & five daughters, Mary, Sarah, Elizab, Ann x Rebecca. e th Peter y 4 sonn of Christoph Baret married to Mary y daughter of Wright of :-;eckles in Suffolk by wnome he hath had severall Children y dyed young. Thomas his eldest married to -, dyed late- ly Issueless. Christoph his 2 sonn is still a single th man: Elizab his daughter married to John Kent of London whoe liveth at y Tonns in Crowchet ffryars & hath Children by her, but I know not how many. e th Robert y 5 sonn of Christoph Baret married to e r Lydia y daughter of ffr: Cock Esq by whome he had several Children y dyed young: his eldest was Chris- topher who eyed Issueless: his daughter Elizabeth mar- ried to Jackson of Yarmouth in Norfolke, March & hath by him one Sonn Robert & one daughter Lydia both young. This ffamily and ther Auncestors did inhabitt in 14. Westhall & Blyborough for betweene Si & 6 hundred yeares & y Coate of Anne a was sett in y Glass win- dowes of y e a parish Churche till y e Late Reforma- tion, that tooxe painted Glass as Idolatrous, beate them downe, as Robert y youngest sonn of y abovesd Christopher did often testify (whilst Liveingj to his owne knowledge. There is now extant an Aunchent Mon- ument of one of o r Auncestors in Bury.& there was an other whoe Layeth buryed in S Martins in the feilds as I was informed by a tetter from a Relation some yeares since. William Baret , 2 d sone to Christoph, beeing ser- vant 31 to S r John Suckling, Controuler to y e howshold a st of his Late Matie Cha y I , about oO odd yeares since, searched y heiroulds' office in London & found y e Coate verry aunchent, given without a crest, and e d about 100 & odd yeares after y Crest of a helmet Bar & Plumed Or & Azure was added; c we nave a tradition amongst vs y it was gi^-en to Will Baret, a french t e Gentleman y cam over with William y Conqueror Jb was with him at y Bataile of Abby , as Stow mentions in his list of names taken after y Battaile. This statement was made by Thomas Barrett of Norwich The word "servant" was then u^ed in England as we use "clerk". 15. (whose pedigree was entered in the Norfolk Visitation th of 1664 J to Sir Edward ijysshe, in a letter dated 4 * Nov. 167 I. Add. MS. 22,883, fo. 40. iv. Peter, fourth son, married Mary Wright of 3eccles, county Suffolk, by whom he had, among otner children, Thomas wno married "nut died without issue, Christo- pher who was unmarried in 1671, and Elisabeth wno married. John Kent of London, and had several children. Peter Baret wrote a letter to his nepnew, Christo- pher Huntington of Saybroox, Connecticut, (a son of his sister Margaret), which is preserved in the State library at Hartford. Tne following is a copy: Cosin Christopher Huntington: Your letter date th about the 20 September, 1649, from Seabrook, I Re - ceaved, & doe pereseve that you have :c shall receive to the value of 140 pounds of my Brother Sawton, x which, when you have Received, & securitee for what shall be behinde unpaide, then give him and my sister an acquittance, as from me, in full Discharge of all matters & Demands that I can or may Lay claim unto from them soe. The Devision of this £140, it shall be thus done: whatever is Lost as ox or cowe, or by x Peter Baret * s sifter Margaret, was then the wife of Lieut. Thomas St ought on. 16. Reason the Comodities may not be altogether worth soe much as you took them for, shall be first deducted out of the £140, & then the rest devided: You shall take out £5 in tne first place, And then devide the rest into five parts, whereof take too to yourself e, one to Symon , one to Thomas, cc one to Ann, w will be all the five parts; & then give to Symon the other five pound, for my Intent is hee shall have £5 more than one fifth part} dc I suppose you now know ay In- tent & meaning nerein,