^>! : i! i Si .i.^^. l\mR\ OF CONGRESS.V l" ' r\ Li i-- / &pjf, Snpi|ng|t !f 0. Shelf. ^..^.B^ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2 ^^'' gfte Sttt^cttts' SjeKiics of gttglisTt ©lassies. SHAKESPEARE'S COMEDY OF A Midsummer-Nights Dream EDITED WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY KATHARINE LEE BATES Wellesley College * " Music and poesy use to quickest you " Taming of the Shrew, I. i. NOV ^^^^ LEACH, SHEWELL, & SANBORN, BOSTON. NEW YORK. CHICAGO. N. ^v. V Copyright, 1895, By Leach, Shewell, & Sanbokn. /^-5fJT> Typogkapht by C. J. Petees & Son, Boston Pbesswobk by Bebwick & Smith. PREFACE. This school edition of A Midsumtner-Night^ s Dream differs but little in plan from the preceding edition of The Merchant of Venice. Both books aim to recog- nize the poetic values of Shakesperian study, and to stimulate the student to do his own thinking about the plays. The distinctive feature of the editing is to be found in the interrogative character of the notes. In- formation which the student could not readily obtain for himself and brief quotations of peculiarly suggestive criticism are supplied, but, more often, questions take the space usually allotted to statements of fact and opinion. The notes are divided into three groups, — tex- tual, grammatical, and literary. The text is based upon that of the first folio, quarto readings and critical guesses being introduced only where the meaning would other- wise be obscured or the cadence seriously marred. Ex- cept in case of obvious misprints, such changes are duly recorded in the notes. The textual notes present, too, all other important quarto variations, and a few of the less impertinent emendations, in order that the student may in every significant instance make his own decision as to what Shakespeare probably wrote. If the folio text as here printed be carefully revised by teacher and iii IV PREFACE. students in accordance with, the suggestions of the notes, the exercise can hardly fail to impart a livelier sense of style in general, and of Shakesperian style in particular, together with something more than a hint of the pro- cesses and principles of Shakesperian scholarship. The textual work, however, is not designed for beginners. It may also be well for junior classes to pass over the grammatical notes, although students sufficiently ad- vanced to undergo the drill in the niceties of language afforded by annotated editions of the Anabasis and the jEneid should find something to interest them in Eliza- bethan syntax. The literary notes refer to the two pre- ceding sets in cases where acquaintance with a textual or grammatical discussion is essential to the appreciation of the passage. In illustration of those elfin and lyric qualities that are to the editor the chief charms of the play, the literary notes contain, together with questions on substance and form, and with more or less of the usual explanatory matter, many scattered bits of .fairy-lore and snatches of Elizabethan song. It is hoped that these notes, judiciously administered, may result not only in a finer and more independent apprehension of the young poet's delectable fairy-drama, but in quickened fancy and fuller joy. The introduction is confined to the play under dis- cussion. For a brief sketch of Shakespeare's early life and of the antecedent growth of the English drama, with references, and for a condensed account, with refer- ences, of Elizabethan copyright and the history of PREFACE. V Shakesperian criticism, students may refer to the intro- duction of The Merchant of Venice in the Students' Series of English Classics. The welcome appearance, this past summer, of A Midsuminer-N'ujhfs Dream in the " ]^ew Variorum " so ably and delightfully edited by Dr. Furness has been a cause of especial thanksgiving to the present writer, whose debt to so rich a mine of learning and wisdom may not easily be overstated. KATHAKLNE LEE BATES. Wkljlesley College, October, 1895. CONTENTS PAGE Preface .• iii Introduction — I. History of the Play 1 IT. Sources 6 III. Structure 10 lY. Treatment 16 A Midsummer-Night's Dream 25 Notes — Textual 113 Gkammatical 129 Literary , 141 INTRODUCTION. I. HISTORY OF THE PLAY. When was A Midsummer-Night's Dream written ? Three hundred years ago nobody cared, and so to-day nobody knows. It was printed in 1600. It was mentioned in 1598. Is there any way of tracing it farther back ? The Queen of Fairyland plumes herself with comical complacency on the cold, wet summer, followed by a poor harvest, which has befallen Attica {alias England) because of her tiny Maj-Bsty's domestic wranglS with " jealous Oberon." At this hint the scholars have ran- sacked Elizabethan literature, from almanac to sermon, in the effort to locate this calamitous season. The year 1595 fell under suspicion, 1597 was challenged, but the bulk of testi- mony points to 1594. Yet while it is quite possible that, in case the play was written and presented during an excep- tionally stormy period, Shakespeare might have alluded to the bad weather, it by no means follows that poetical fogs and frosts within the theatre are proof of literal fogs and frosts without. If we knew from other sources that A Mid- summer-Nighfs Dream was acted in 1594, it would be sound criticism — supposing, what some critics deny, that weather and description tally — to recognize in Titania's boast, pro- tracted as it is, a reference to the times ; but the reverse does not hold good. It cannot be maintained that this much-dis- puted passage has established the date of the comedy. Neither 1 2 INTE OB UCTION. can anything more solid than conjecture be raised upon tlie lines, — " The thrice-three Muses, mourning for the death Of Learning, late deceas'd in beggary," although there may well be in these saucily syllabled verses both a reminiscence of the alliterative Spenser's somewhat despondent poem, " The Teares of the Muses," 1591, and, with this, a haunting, not unkindly memory of poor, brilliant, un- stable Robert Greene, " Master of Arts in both Universities," who had worked with Shakespeare, and envied Shakespeare, and had died a profligate's death in 1592. A Midsummer-Nighfs Dream has something the effect of a bridal masque. It is easy to see in imagination a stately Elizabethan hall thronged with applauding gentles, while the young poet, still in the dress of Lysander, receives with be- coming modesty the thanks of a noble bridegroom, and bends his knee to the imperial smile of the " fair vestal throned by the west." Again the critics have recourse to the Elizabethan annals, and again the fruits of research are confusion and dis- appointment, although two weddings within the decade have excited especial interest. The Earl of Essex espoused the widow of Sir Philip Sidney in April, 1590. It was a private marriage which, when divulged, brought down upon the young husband the hot wrath of the queen. A private marriage, however, might admit of private festivities. Shakespeare was then a " poor player " of six and twenty, seeking a patron. There is, apparently, a loyal reference to Essex, who was three years Shakespeare's junior, in Henry V. (Prologue to Act Y., lines 29-34), and it is probable that sooner or later the two men were personally acquainted. If the play was acted on or near May Day, the plot becomes significant, while the title, INTBOBUCTION. 3 A Mid summer-Nigh fs Dream, usually understood, like Twelfth Night, as indicating the time when the comedy was first brought upon the stage, may have been added for a later public presentation in a London theatre. The other wedding about which much wistful curiosity has played is that of the Earl of Southampton and Elizabeth Vernon in 1598. This, too, was a secret marriage, and one peculiarly unwelcome to