Glass jB F7o3_L Book___^FG /zc NEW LIGHT ON IMMORTALITY BY THE SAME AUTHOR TWO NEW WORLDS. I. The Infra-World. II. The Supra-World. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d. net. THE ELECTRON THEORY : a Popular Introduction to the New Theory of Electricity and Magnetism. With a Preface by G. Johnstone Stoney, M. A., D.Sc, F.R.S. With Frontispiece Por- trait of Dr. Stoney, and 35 Diagrams in the Text. Crown 8vo, 5s. net. LONGMANS, GEEEN, AND CO. LONDON, NEW YORK, BOMBAY, AND CALCUTTA NEW LIGHT ON IMMORTALITY BV E. E. FOURNIER d'ALBE B.Sc. (Lonb.), M.R.I. A. AUTHOR OF "THE ELECTRON THEORY" AND "TWO NEW WORLDS HON. SECRETARY OP THE DUBLIN SECTION OP THE SOCIETY FOR PSYCHICAL RESEARCH WITH ILLUSTRATIONS AND DIAGRAMS IN TEXT LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON NEW YORK, BOMBAY, AND CALCUTTA 1908 All rights reserved .f6 Us «3 °^ TO MY DEAR WIFE EDITH CONSUELO THIS BOOK IS AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATED Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from The Library of Congress http://www.archive.org/details/newlightonimmortOOfour PREFACE The present work has arisen out of the cosmological speculations embodied in " Two New Worlds," which themselves were suggested by certain recent advances in our knowledge of the atoms of matter and of electricity. It seemed to me desirable that the new materials should be used as soon as possible to further the solution of the " question of questions," the possibility of human immortality. Lest it appear presumptuous for a physicist to venture an opinion on such a subject, which is usually associated with psychology and theology rather than experimental science, I may plead that the relations between mind and matter require for their elucidation an extensive acquaintance with what is actually known about matter and what is not known about it. And every one, I think, will acknowledge that the relations between mind and matter are at the very root of all possible theories concerning immortality. Now the physicist is per- manently confronted with problems concerning the ultimate nature of matter, more so even than the chemist, and much more than the physiologist, who usually derives his ideas concerning matter from elementary text-books of physics and chemistry. This explains the fascination which ultimate ques- Vlll PREFACE tions are found to exert upon representatives of physics rather than upon devotees of other branches of science. This book, then, is an attempt at what we might call a Physical Theory of Immortality. Such a theory must make the minimum of new assump- tions, must not contradict any known law of physics, and must bear thinking out in all its consequences without leading to qualitative and quantitative absurdities. These requisites I have borne steadily in mind. The result, to me at all events, has been distinctly satisfactory, and although not all the points are fully worked out yet, I have, so far, failed to discover any inconsistency with the laws and experiences of the world we live in. I have taken pains to remain throughout in close touch with the facts of physiology, and have em- bodied some of the most recent results of that great science in the following pages. At the same time I have guarded myself against accepting those crude hypotheses and speculations concerning ultimate realities with which some physiologists are inclined to cloak their real ignorance concerning the inner working of the phenomena they investigate. The theory developed in the first two parts of this book may be taken, at all events, as a type of a theory of immortality which has a chance of being accepted by the scientifically trained mind. It remains for theologians to declare whether a theory of this type can be satisfactorily embodied in their systems. On this question I cannot venture to express any opinion, but I think they will acknow- PREFACE IX ledge the obvious advantage of having even a work- ing hypothesis of a future life presented to them, such as both parties could possibly be brought to agree upon. In Part III. I have gone a step further. I have ventured to include in my survey a large class of phenomena which official science has not yet accepted. I refer to what are now most usually styled " meta- psychical " phenomena, and which form the subject- matter of what is known as psychical research. Of these I have had little personal experience, but a careful examination of the extensive literature of the subject has forced upon me the conclusion that a large and solid basis of reality is at the bottom of these somewhat rare and elusive happenings. That being so, it seems naturally a little strange that they have not yet been fully recognised. But that fate has historically been shared by many other facts which did not happen to fit in with the views prevailing at the time. To judge from the trend of modern opinion, the time is approaching when a slight rearrangement of our general principles will provide the elasticity necessary to allow of these facts being duly placed and catalogued. The step I have here taken is therefore not fraught with such dire dangers of heterodoxy as some of my scientific friends have so kindly warned me of. And, even if it were, I should regard it as an obvious and imperative duty to state in precise and unambiguous language the conclusion I have, after careful exa- mination of witnesses on both sides, deliberately arrived at. X PREFACE But it should be understood that the views advanced in this book do not stand or fall with the reality or otherwise of metapsychieal phenomena. The hypothesis sketched out, or something like it, is necessary to explain the phenomena of every-day life and growth, which are not fully accounted for by any theory so far put forward. The central beam of the " new light " is the rehabilitation of life as the primary and ultimate reality. The reduction of the laws of nature to the laws of life of that congeries of inferior strata of life which we call " matter " is the most important of the new conceptions here established. It is, of course, an obvious corollary of the theorems pro- posed in my " Infra- World." In conclusion I beg to thank those kind Dublin friends who have assisted me with the loan of books and the verification of references, and Mr. E. Dawson Rogers and Mr. Henry Withall for the loan of valuable photographs. E. E. FOURNIER d'ALBE. 11 Sunbuky Gardens, Dublin, September 1908. CONTENTS PART I CHAPTER I THE PROBLEM BEFORE US PAGE The modern attitude towards death — Quantitative aspects of death — Unknown territories to explore — Man's growing optimism — Attitudes of science and theology — What we want to know 1 CHAPTER II WHAT IS LIFE? Ancient and modern definitions — Attempts to define life in terms of matter — No sharp demarcation between living and dead matter — Life more fundamental and " knowable" than matter — What do we know about matter? — The prestige of matter — Practical evidence of " existence" — Orders of reality — Matter expressed in terms of life — Laws of Nature — The life of " dead matter " — Low-order consciousness — The laws of Nature are the moral laws of lower universes — The life period of atoms . . .10 CHAPTER III THE BUSINESS OF LIFE The human messenger — The organic life-work — Pre-natal activity — Development after birth — Social or "waking" consciousness takes the place of the organic consciousness Xll CONTENTS PAGE — Vicarious : experience — The function of language — The submergence of the organic consciousness — Maturity a birth into the social world — The social business of life — Racial consciousness — Extension of personality — The personality lof communities — Selfishness — The interpre- tation of ordinary avocations — Happiness — Wisdom . 30 CHAPTER IV THE MECHANISM OF LIFE A problem of chemical physics — The human machine — A cell mechanism — Wilson on co-ordination — -Intercellular con- nections — Protoplasmic continuity — Grades of vitality — The organic hierarchy — Self-determination — No purely local phenomena — Regeneration — The death penalty — The deathless amoeba — Heredity and the Chromosomes — The centre of vitality of the cell — An invisible body . 50 CHAPTER V THE LAWS OF NATURE A security or a restraint — Who frames the laws ?— Impossi- bility — How we generalise — Majesty of natural law — Its human import — Discrediting of speculation — British and continental schools — Materialism still in power — Pax Romano, — Universality of life — Definition of a world — The world of atoms — Life of atomic species — The laws of nature are the social laws of inferior worlds — Souls within souls — Our blood relationship with all life, and with all that exists — Superior aggregations ... 76 CHAPTER VI BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRIT No room for a universal cataclysm — A new monism — Diagram of existences — The individual covers an infinite series of worlds — Death is the extraction of the vital or directing / CONTENTS Xlll PAGE elements — The search for a spiritual body — Possibility of its extraction — Externalisation of personality — Properties of the externalised body — A gaseous constitution — Where is heaven 1 96 PART II CHAPTER I BIRTH If life were reversible — Unicellular cell-division — Tetramitus — Conjugation — Union of the nuclei — Alternation of generations — Necessity of subdivision — The multiplica- tion of nuclei — Division and fusion of souls — The function of sex — Germ -cells — The problem of development — No physical causality conceivable — Infra-world memories . 115 CHAPTER II LIFE AFTER DEATH Are we prepared for a theory? — Orthodox reticence— The negative attitude of materialism — No real belief in a future life — A scientific demonstration required — No room for dogma — Modern tests and requirements — Un- expected complexity— No finality — Popular ideas reduced to absurdity — Our guiding principles — No world outside God 131 CHAPTER III THE SOUL-BODY Self-determination and the conservation of energy — The soul- body consists of material particles or structures— Proposal to call them " Psychomeres " — Darwin's "gemmules" — Weismann's " determinants "—Relation to chromosomes XIV CONTENTS PAGE and centrosomes — Weight of the soul-body— Effects of withdrawal of the psychomeres— Probable experiences — Time required for withdrawal — Comparison with chloro- form — defence of the organism — The final struggle — The moment after — The liberated soul — New functions — Earth-memories — Can a soul be wounded ? — The souls of cripples — Shape of the soul — Probable resemblance to a flame — Familiar instances — Cohesion of the soul-body — Assumption of former terrestrial shape .... 144 CHAPTER IV THE SOUL-WORLD Where is it ? — Alternative locations — Non-euclidian space — The fourth dimension — Three-dimensional space — Choice of worlds — The claims of our atmosphere — No valid objection — Structure of the atmosphere — Recent investi- gations — The isothermal layer — Evidences of stratifica- tion — Conditions of aerial life — Anatomical peculiarities — Sense-organs — Life in the soul-world .... 160 CHAPTER V INTERCOMMUNICATION The soul-world as seen from the earth — The earth as seen from the soul-world — Difficulties of intercourse — Rela- tions between the two worlds — Not necessarily amicable — No absolute separation — Community of ideals necessary — The struggle between opposite ideals — The basis of ethics — Public aspects of intercommunication — Stamping it out — How a truth becomes a myth — The flight of the fairies — Recent revivals — Methods of communication — Alternative methods — Method of the soul- world — Method of the earth-world — Spirit control of an earthly organism — Passivity and familiarity — No revelations concerning earth-life to be expected — No terrors ahead — Disease and death 175 CONTENTS XV CHAPTER VI THE WIDER PROBLEMS OP IMMORTALITY PAGE Do animals possess souls ? — Are animals and plants immortal ? — Conditions of immortality — Will and utility — Optional immortality — Amalgamation of individuals — Grades of disintegration — Blood relationship — Eeincarnation — Its difficulties — Karma — Higher entities — Kingly souls — Our responsibility — Human power ...... 191 PART III CHAPTER I THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY Decay of the introspective method — The psychophysical lab- oratory — Psychopathology — Hypnotism — Known and un- known — A theory more necessary than further facts — Summary of our theory in 19 articles — New data to be embodied — Boirac's classification — Hypnoid, Magne- toid, Spiritoid — Misuse of the word "force" — Definition of " force " — The specialisation of science — Most modern theories are specialist devices applicable to a limited range of facts — Frederick Myers — The panorama of the soul — Our modification — Refutable and verifiable — The subliminal self — The spirit hypothesis .... 203 CHAPTER II THE STORY OP " KATIE KING " The best-aiithenticated record — Miss Florence Cook — Annie Morgan, alias " Katie King " — Her full form photographed by magnesium light — Reproduced as a wood- engraving — May 7, 1873 — Exceptional conditions — Stringent tests — Mr. Luxmoore's account — Mr. Harrison's account — Diffi- culties of exposure to light — An authentic photograph — Alleged " exposure" of the medium — Cromwell Varley's XVI CONTENTS PAGE electrical test — Full report — Further particulars— Mr. Coleman's account of the farewell scene — Portrait of Miss Florence Cook in 1874 — Separate identities of Miss Cook and "Katie King" — Later portrait of Mrs. Corner (Florence Cook) — Preserved pieces of "Katie King's" dress — Mr. Harrison's account — Souvenirs of hair — Parting words — "Florence Marryat's" account — Thorough ex- amination of the form — The question of separate identity — The press on " Katie King "— Lombroso and Richet . 218 CHAPTER III INTERPRETATION OF THE PHENOMENA Clearly impossible" — Why official science was not con- vinced — Sir William Crookes' advantages — Why he suc- ceeded — A remarkable test — Hasty generalisations — Spiritualism in Europe and America — Physical character- istics of "spirit forms" — Mental characteristics — No shadow ghosts — Voice manifestations — Moral character- istics — Sensations of the medium — Drapery — Harrison's hypothesis — Alternative interpretations — "Katie King" an independent entity — "Katie King" a "double" of Florence Cook — The spirit hypothesis the simplest — Mechanism of materialisation — Risks and limitations . 268 CHAPTER IV SUPERNORMAL PHYSICAL PHENOMENA The Dialectical Society's Report — Movements of furniture — Method of the spiritualists — Instructions for private in- vestigations — Dr. Maxwell on raps — Eusapia Paladino at Cambridge — Crookes'catalogue of phenomena — Weighing of evidence — Science cannot recognise miracles pure and simple— Man supreme in his own sphere — Externalisation of energy — Source of power — The demon theory — The effect of enlightenment 294 CONTENTS xvil CHAPTER V PROOFS OF SURVIVAL PAGE Difficulties of identification — Identification of living persons — Similarity of methods and of evidence — The case of Frau von Bille-Dahl — Mr. Aksakoff's observations — Mental tests — Communications from Myers, Hodgson, and Gurney — Cross-references to "Mrs. Holland" and Mrs. Verrall — Sir Oliver Lodge's announcement . . 310 CHAPTER VI CONCLUSIONS The road behind us — How we found the soul — Survival a thinkable contingency — A question of physics and physiology — The fear of death — The needs of the heart — Reward and punishment — A boundless prospect . . 321 Index 329 ILLUSTRATIONS ' PORTRAIT OF "KATIE KING". . . . To face p. 222 -.A PHOTOGRAPH OF "KATIE KING" . . „ 232 •MISS FLORENCE COOK IN 1874 ... „ 250 • A LATER PORTRAIT OF MISS FLORENCE COOK (Mrs. Elgib Corner) .... ,,253 NEW LIGHT ON IMMORTALITY PART I CHAPTER I THE PROBLEM BEFORE US The twentieth century is too busy to occupy itself much with the problems presented by death and what follows it. The man of the world makes his will, insures his life, and dismisses his own death with the scantiest forms of politeness. The churches, once chiefly interested in the ultimate fate of the soul after death, now devote the bulk of their energies to moral instruction and social amelioration. Death is all but dead, as an over- shadowing doom and an all-absorbing subject of controversy. The spectacle of 2,000,000,000 human beings rushing to their doom with no definite knowledge of what that doom may be, and yet taking life as it comes, happily and merrily enough as a rule, seems strange and almost unaccountable. The spectacle somewhat resembles that inside a prison A 2 THE PROBLEM BEFORE US during the Reign of Terror, when prisoners passed their time in animated and even gay converse, not knowing who would be called out next to be trundled to the scaffold. Such a spectacle has from time to time appalled sensitive hearts, and led them to endeavour to impress upon their fellow-creatures the precarious- ness of their predicament and the uncertainty of their fate. Such admonitions have, however, but a temporary effect generally. It is only when death approaches the individual himself, or those most dear to him, that the Problem confronts him in deadly earnest. What are we ? Whence and whither ? Here am I yet, a being full of mental and physical activities, in full possession of my reasoning faculties, with a vast memory and experi- ence in the background, capable of understanding and influencing my surroundings, filling my place to the happiness and advantage of others, indis- pensable, perhaps, to their well-being — and yet this will all come to an end, a painful and perhaps inglorious end, just as it did in that other being whose soul was intertwined with mine, whose thoughts and very life were mine, and without whom I could not conceive of existence as possible ! Every year some 40,000,000 human corpses are consigned to the earth. A million tons of human flesh and blood and bone are discarded as of no further service to humanity, to be gradually trans- THE COMMON FATE 3 formed into other substances and perhaps other forms of life. Meanwhile the human race in its myriad forms lives and thrives. Its aggregate weight of 50,000,000 tons shows no sign of dimin- ution. No matter if the whole race is renewed every fifty years. No matter if the population of the Unknown Land increases every year by half the population of the United States. The individual perishes, the species survives. Death is a natural necessity, a matter of exact science and statistics, an inexorable doom. The individual terror sinks out of sight in the triumph of the aggregate, a triumph reflected in the ordinary indifference of the individual. " Thy fate is the common fate of all." What need to murmur when we all must suffer the same fate ? Our ancestors have faced it before us without flinching. We have nothing to complain of. We are like soldiers on a battlefield, with equal chances of being shot. A spirit of com- radeship keeps us courageous and resourceful. We have spells of panic, but a single bright example of bravery suffices to annul it. And so the race lives on, surrounded on all sides by deadly peril, and manages to smile amid a thousand forms of torture and annihilation. This magnificent nonchalance in the face of death must have some justification. It is incon- ceivable that all these millions should be indifferent to their future fate. It cannot be the effect of 4 THE PROBLEM BEFORE US religion, since this indifference is found in its most pronounced form among the least religious com- munities. It can hardly be a growing conviction that there is no immortality, that death cancels and swallows up everything, for such a feeling could not produce a vigorous and cheerful life. Most likely it is a half unconscious conviction that some- how everything will work out well, that the bright- ness and beauty of this world is a promise of more joy and delight in other forms of existence, and that the Power which gives us even a few glimpses of happiness now is the same Power that will rule and bless our future life. It may be also that the task of probing into the future has proved so beset with difficulties, the results of research so meagre and disappointing, the most eminent opinions so contradictory, that many have given up all " idle speculation " in that direc- tion, confining themselves to more accessible fields of endeavour, exploring the visible universe and tracing its laws, or ordering their surroundings and material prospects so as to secure the maximum of comfort and enjoyment for themselves and those whose personalities are linked amicably with their own. Yet one cannot but imagine that this state of things will change. Mankind is so inquisitive, so restlessly active in elucidating mysteries and extend- ing the realm of certainty, that the land beyond THE DEBATABLE LAND 5 the grave must surely some day be asked to yield up its fruits of truth. When we dissect the body and probe the human soul to its depths, it surely does not mean that bodily comfort and mental sanity for threescore years and ten are the highest aim of all our work ! No ; our minds will not be satisfied with half truths. When we explore any new territory, any new portion of the Unknown, we are not finally satisfied with contradictions and in- comprehensibilities. These only act as irritants and stimuli towards further endeavour. They encourage younger minds to try and succeed where the first pioneers failed. Nothing is so discouraging to a young Alexander as the thought that his father has left him no worlds to conquer ! Well, here are your worlds, young men ! Here is Freedom and Neces- sity, Mind and Matter, Moral Kesponsibility, the Origin of Evil, Life and Death, and Immortality — all subjects full of difficulties and pitfalls, puzzles on which the mightiest intellects have in vain plied their weapons of analysis. Ye shall succeed where your forebears failed. Has Science any new light wherewith to illumine the Debatable Land ? Have we explored in vain the depths of stellar space ? Have we solidified air, harnessed the lightning, isolated the bacillus, and split the atom without making any real and vital advance ? Are we for ever to inscribe on our tomb- stones a note of interrogation, and — 6 THE PROBLEM BEFORE US " Speak of death with bated breath, And faces blanched with fear " 1 It has been said that the lives of savages are played against a perpetual background of dread, that certainty, safety, reasonable security, are the highest gifts of civilisation. We may therefore expect that efforts will always be made to dispel the haunting insecurity of our existence, and to give us a firm footing in both worlds — the world we live in and the world to come. But the difficulties of the task are complicated by two diametrically opposite factors. On the one hand we have Science, largely materialistic or ag- nostic, which either denies point-blank all existence after death, or regards its problems as insoluble and all attempts in that direction as doomed to failure. On the other side stands theology in its many forms, armed too often with dogmatic pronounce- ments and girt about with a narrow-minded and ultra-conservative bigotry which would fain reserve the Unknown Land to itself and refuse admission to all surveying expeditions. Mankind will refuse to be fettered by either of these. No preconceived negative theory will prevent a new science being born which shall embrace all discoveries on the new continent, and that new world will be too closely associated with mankind at large and man's departed to be willingly handed over to the exclusive use of any one theology, however ancient or imposing. WHAT WE WANT TO KNOW 7 We may therefore set to work on this pioneer's task, with due care and reverence and circum- spection. We want to know what life is, and what relation it holds to matter, how it is organised and supported, how it thrives and multiplies, decays and disappears. We want to know what gives us our present bodies, why they develop as they do, without our knowing or controlling the process ; why we pass through certain stages at certain epochs, and subsequently, much against our will, gradually withdraw into ourselves and disappear from the stage. We want to know what constitutes death, what are its essential attributes and conditions, what makes it inevitable. We want to know what constitutes our individuality and identity, why we are we and none else, what hope we have of pre- serving this identity. We want to know how it feels to die, and what happens to us after we have passed the portals of the Unseen. We want to know whether we shall live for ever, and if so, whether we have lived before, or only begun exist- ence when we entered this world. And if we are immortal, are horses and dogs immortal, and trees and plants, and mushrooms and earwigs, and tubercle bacilli ? And if not, is the cleverest dog more mortal than the unborn babe or the hopeless idiot or the lowest savage ? And if that is so, what is it that gives man this tremendous privilege over the highest animal intelligence ? 8 THE PROBLEM BEFORE US And then we want to know the function of pain, the essence of happiness, the mission of good and evil, whether there are eternal rewards and punish- ments, and whether our conduct here determines our fate hereafter. We want to know if any com- munication exists between this world and the next, any wireless telegraph joining the two continents, any code of signals, any Esperanto for communica- tion. We ask whether the dead return, whether they appear again to us in this world, and if they do, whether such phantoms are real or imaginary. We want to know whether communication, or in- creased communication, between us and the de- parted is likely to benefit either us or them. In any case, we want to indicate how, if required, the gulf between us can be bridged over, and intelligent communication safely established. All this is to be done with the aid of an enlarged and enlighted Science. The foundations of present- day science are not broad enough to reach those ethereal heights where the spirits dwell. Like Marconi in Connemara, we must build a wider and vaster structure on new foundations, a structure of superior range and carrying capacity. But in doing so, all the latest results and advances of science must be brought into play. All the magnificent work hitherto accomplished in physics, astronomy, chemistry, biology, and experimental psychology must be pressed into service. Special attention MODERN WEAPONS 9 must be paid to the more recondite problems of mental pathology, and the results of the psychical and metapsychical research. Just as physicists and chemists use that rare substance, radium, to discover new and fundamental laws of matter, so must we search among the authentic records of supernormal phenomena for new guides and new enlightenments. And combining all these materials with the accepted and universal canons of logic, applying to them a sound and fearless common sense, and clothing them in a simple and unambiguous language, we may hope to acquit ourselves of our task with some benefit to afflicted humanity. CHAPTER II WHAT IS LIFE? Whenever we wish to define or explain a thing, we require something else to which, in whole or in part, it is equivalent, something to which we can reduce it or with which we can compare it. Ancient philosophy wisely refrained from a defini- tion of life in terms of something else, and dealt by preference with the soul, the " formal cause " of the organised body, assuming, as a rule, some connection with the breath, the steaming blood, the shadow, or some other less material and more evanescent aspect of the body or its functions. Modern science, more discerning and enterprising, and less devout, has attempted to define life in terms of that conception with which most of its researches have hitherto dealt, viz. matter or material. Thus we find in Baldwin's " Dictionary of Philo- sophy and Psychology " the following : — " Life : A form of organisation found in certain material things, having the properties of self-per- petuation, for a longer or shorter time, and of reproduction in some form, and further distinguished WHAT IS LIFE ? I I by certain characters described as vital properties, or properties of living matter." These characters are usually described as (1) nutrition, (2) reproduction, and (3) irritability, but later researches have eliminated (1) and (3) from the essential characteristics of living matter. Leduc's artificial plants, Lehmann's " living crystals," and J. Chunder Bose's researches on the irritability of metals have pushed back the boundary between the living and the non-living until it is hard to say where it lies, or whether there is in truth any such boundary at all. Growth and assimilation are only approximate criteria. " Assimilation enables us to recognise life only by means of long-continued observation." As regards reproduction, Burke's " radiobes " should warn us against any dogmatism on this point. Nor does chemistry help us. Le Dantec says 1 : " We cannot say by what chemical or colloid peculiarity the living being differs from its corpse "(p. 29). And again: "We cannot dis- tinguish the living whole ' cytoplasm-nucleus ' from the dead aggregate corpse of the cytoplasm and corpse of the nucleus" (p. 46). Life, according to modern biology, is " an aquatic phenomenon." It is " a surface accident in the history of the thermic evolution of the globe." Life is a matter of chemical physics, but " in the present 1 Le Dantec, " The Nature and Origin of Life." Hodder and Stoughton, 1907. ■— I 2 WHAT IS LIFE ? state of science, we are able to define exactly neither the chemical structure nor the colloidal state peculiar to living substances — and yet this, doubtless, would be sufficient to characterise life " (Le Dantec, p. 45). The least material definition is perhaps that which defines life as a succession of "functions" or rather " functionings," or, more generally, as a continual self-adaptation to surroundings. A purely mechanical or chemical view would reduce life to the configuration and motion of the molecules, atoms, or electrons of the substance ap- parently endowed with it, such motion taking place in strict and rigid conformity with the unchanging laws governing the moving forces. This view would make every event of life inevitable, predestined, and ultimately calculable. The " vitalistic " school, on the other hand, recog- nises a something apart from matter and motion, something not subject to mechanical or chemical laws, which yet exerts a determining influence upon vital processes. This something may be a" growth force " (Cope), a " genetic energy " (Williams), a kind of " self-adaptation " (Henslow), or " self-direc- tion " (Eimer), or, finally, a directive action of mind (Lodge), which is able to direct the flow of energy without influencing its amount, and thus remains in accord with the doctrine of the conservation of energy. WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT MATTER? 1 3 These, then, are the main attempts to explain life in terms of something else which is not life. Now it is obvious that an explanation is valueless unless it reduces something of which we know little or nothing to something of which we know more. The question then arises as to whether life or matter is the more fundamental, familiar, or knowable phenomenon. We must, in fact, find out whether matter, with or without some semi-material or immaterial adjunct, is capable of " explaining " life, and of forming a basis for its interpretation and control. What do we Know About Mattee? Matter has acquired a tremendous prestige through the development of physical and chemical science. Formerly treated with contempt as some- thing gross, corrupt, and perishable, it has almost become an idol fit to worship. It has at least become the substratum of the visible universe, an eternal and indestructible substance, capable, by the permutations and combinations of its elements and particles, of giving rise to all the various forms, happenings, and beings which make up our world. A great number of rules have been discovered which apparently govern the action of one portion of matter on another. A vast proportion of such interactions have been made amenable to prediction, 14 WHAT IS LIFE? calculation, and control. The more of these rules we discover, the greater becomes our interest in, and our respect for, the properties and workings of this mysterious substance. Our reverence for matter has much in common with the ancient reverence for a mighty king. We enter his country. We find his coinage and his image everywhere, his soldiers in their uniforms, his police, his laws, his rewards and punishments, his unfailing benevolence for the good, his wrath which falls upon the evil-doers, his irrevocable sentence, his unfailing mercy and charity. Our admiration increases when we find his whole people permeated by their ruler's ideas and aspirations, devoted to his person, willing to give their lives in his service. To these subjects, the king personifies all that is permanent, stable, mighty, and majestic. They find it easier to imagine the end of all things than a change in the order of their state. Or again we may admire a great empire or republic, a great organisation of any kind. We may entrust our whole fortune to a bank, believing it to be firm as a rock. In short, we find some- thing that is firm and sure, a foothold in the swirl of phenomena, and straightway we build upon it the structures, material or mental, which the human mind ever loves to design. And so with matter. We find in it something that does not shift with our passing whim, or (more RECURRENT SENSATIONS I 5 important still) our neighbour's passing whim. That is really all we care about. If I have a watch which keeps good time, it matters not to me whether the gold or brass of which it is made evolved in past ages out of uranium or lead, nor whether there is any " ultimate reality " behind that bundle of sensations which I remember and combine under the label, " my watch." Enough that when I look at it I can see the time, that I can feel it in my waistcoat pocket, that I can hear it ticking, and that I have a reasonable assurance of being able to enjoy those three sensations whenever I like. Of course, without those three sensations I should have no evidence of the existence of my watch, and if I cannot obtain such evidence indirectly (through somebody else's sense organs) I cannot know whether or not it has ceased to exist. And further, if I take away all memories of those three sensations, my watch will be practically non-existent. As far as I am concerned, the world may be full of watches, crowded with them indeed, but so long as neither I, nor other sentient beings with whom I am in touch, can perceive them, or the effects of their presence, I am justified in taking their non-existence for granted. The same argument applies to all matter. We may therefore define matter as that which, when brought into a certain relation (distance or prox- imity) with us, or with beings similar to ourselves excites in us or in them certain sensations. 1 6 WHAT IS LIFE? The proviso " beings similar to ourselves " is important. For when we come to think of it, our unaided evidence is not conclusive. If I see a book lying on a table I can as a rule safely con- clude that it is " actually there." But what does " actually there " mean ? It cannot mean simply that I do see it, for that would be nothing new. It must mean (1) that I can " do " things with it, and thus derive other groups of sensations from its presence ; (2) that other people also could see it, and test its presence in the same manner. When (1) turns out to be correct, I have reason- able grounds for " crediting the evidence of my own eyes." But there is still a possibility that I am dreaming ! To reassure myself, I call in a friend, and if he agrees with my verdict, my conviction that I have an "actual thing" to deal with is strengthened. To make assurance doubly sure, I call in other friends, and if we all have the same impression, the " fact " is established. Is this, then, the generally accepted and con- clusive manner of establishing a fact ? By no means. For in the history of the human race it has happened over and over again that a fact has been implicitly believed and attested by hundreds or thousands of people, and yet has been finally dis- credited, perhaps even by many of its original observers. This fate has not only overtaken " facts " which OBJECTIVE REALITY I 7 are essentially theories (like the flatness or im- mobility of the earth), but even sensory phenomena observed and described by half-a-dozen experts, and corroborated by photography. Of this, Blondlot's "N-rays" furnish a familiar and instructive example. We cannot, therefore, arrive at a definition of matter from our own observations, or those of our neighbours, or from any hypotheses concerning " real existence " — a term which in this connection would be utterly meaningless. But we can be perfectly sure of our own sensations. No matter what may be their cause, whether they be brought about by " objective reality " or whether they be the wild fancies of a fevered brain. So long as they last, they are real, and they form the only ultimate reality which we can postulate from personal ob- servation. " Objective reality " we can only ascribe to those things which produce similar sensations in organisms similar to our own when similarly situated, and " matter " is such an " objective reality." This, it will be remarked, is rather a flimsy substratum on which to build our " material uni- verse." So it is ; but it is the only substratum which logic and philosophy can afford us. However, for practical purposes it is quite sufficient. Suppose, for the sake of argument, that by some sudden and curious inversion of things our dream Avorld should 1 8 WHAT IS LIFE? become " reality," and our waking world should become a dream. Suppose that dream events were found to observe certain unalterable rules, different perhaps from those of our waking world, but still as permanent and as independent of our will as they. Supposing such a real dream were continued indefinitely. Then by what process could we ever be convinced of the " unreality " of our dream ? Dream and reality would have simply changed places. Like " Alice in Wonderland," we should have to try and find out the queer new " laws of nature " of our dream world, and make the best of them. All we know about matter, therefore, is that it produces certain sensations in the vast majority of individuals of the human race. Matter is therefore by no means a fundamental conception. In this respect, it is surpassed by many other conceptions. A child gets to know its mother long before it arrives at the conception of matter. As we depart from the fundamental realities of our own sensations, we have to bring into play more of our powers of cognition, and less of our perceptive faculties. We may give, perhaps, the following list of ultimate realities, proceeding from the most fun- damental to the less fundamental : — (1) Our own sensations. (2) The existence of other people. (3) The sensations of other people. (4) The existence of matter. MATTER OF CONVENIENCE 1 9 The reasoning given above proves, I think, con- clusively, that none of these can be regarded as existing, unless those preceding it are taken for granted. It is apparent at once that, since (1), (2), and (3) involve consciousness, and (4) does not, we cannot " explain " consciousness in terms of matter. We cannot even define it in terms of matter, since matter is itself but a fourth-rate abstraction. There is, on the other hand, no logical difficulty in reduc- ing matter to terms of the first three fundamentals. That this has not been done is due to certain prac- tical considerations of economy. The word " matter " is a convenient abbreviation for a certain tangle of sensations and memories of sensations, individual or collective. The practical effect upon us of that reality which is at the back of matter is not changed by (erroneously) regarding matter itself as a reality. So long as we remember that matter is not a fundamental reality, but an abstraction derived from sense experience, there is no harm in dealing with it practically as if it had an exist- ence independent of ourselves. But the mischief is, that we don't remember this when we deal with the higher problems of philosophy, and so we get lost in a hopeless maze of contradictions. It is right for me to remember, that if I wind up my watch regularly it will go ; in other words, that if I produce in myself certain muscular sensations having a certain connection with the sensations of 20 WHAT IS LIFE? touch associated with that abstraction from experi- ence called " my watch/' said abstraction will con- tinue to develop in the same orderly visual manner in which it has hitherto progressed. Practically, the first way of expressing this fact is very much more convenient than the second way. But philo- sophically the second way is more correct, and applicable over a much wider range of experience. It is, moreover (though one might at first sight think otherwise), much freer from risky theorising, and, indeed, much more " matter of fact " in the true sense. This example not only shows what economy the conception of " matter " introduces into our modes of expression, but also explains why matter should gradually have acquired the place and prestige of a fundamental reality, if not the fundamental reality. Matter in Terms of Life In this work, however, we are not engaged in the task of stating and cataloguing phenomena in the shortest and most concise manner, but in discovering the real nature, origin, and destiny of life. For this purpose, it is not legitimate to regard life and matter as things apart. In order to escape from this ob- session of materialism, from this ever-present and almost irresistible temptation to regard matter as self-existent and independent, we must follow out MATTER IN TERMS OF LIFE 21 our logical course to the end. That logical course gives us only one perfect way. We must explain matter in terms of life, not only in a general way, but down to the most minute particulars. Thus we may hope to gain a real advance in knowledge, keeping all the while in touch with full and ultimate reality. How, then, shall we reduce the phenomena of " dead matter " to terms of life ? Obviously, we must begin with our own most fundamental realities, and gradually venture outside ourselves into the open, into that teeming world peopled with intelli- gences billionfold, where we delight to recognise now and then something akin to ourselves. The growth of every infant illustrates this fascinating process. The only things present to the immature infant mind are sensations, which rapidly assume an orderly sequence : hunger, food, satis- faction; darkness, sleep; cold, crying, nursing, warmth; and so on. Next come more elaborate motor activities : visual sensations invariably accompanying certain motor impulses, developing gradually into voluntary motion. Then the perception of outside personalities, originating in similarities of voice, of appearance, of motion, until the mother or nurse becomes, after self, the most dominant and funda- mental reality. Then the perception of things, originally regarded also as evidence of personalities, but gradually catalogued in a class of sensations indirectly subject to will. 2 2 WHAT IS LIFE ? The child stops there. To the child, and to the nnphilosophic members of the human race, material things are ultimate realities, while they last, at all events. But by-and-by, when the thinking faculties are developed, the mind probes deeper. The things are taken to pieces and are reduced to combinations of parts. Forms are distinguished, and when two things still differ, though having the same form, the conception of material is arrived at. The infinite variety of materials is reduced by analysing them into their elements, and recombining these in various ways. The behaviour of the elements is studied, and rules are found which denote their " properties " and the properties of their com- binations. The human mind is thus ceaselessly active in adapting its environment to its own needs. For all this analysis and recombination has that one single object — betterment. We seek for new combinations of parts, of forms, of materials, of elements in order to find combinations which suit us better. The child, in grasping a toy, does what we all do in more elaborate ways. It has learnt the centripetal law of appropriation, and has known the delights of ownership. We look for laws of wider sweep and more universal sway. The child learns the rules of the nursery. We search out the laws of nature. These " laws of nature," whence are they ? Why do elements have certain properties, and their com- STRATA OF LIFE 23 binations new properties ? Proceeding, as before, from the known to the unknown, we begin with the " properties " we observe in ourselves, with the qualities of our fellow-men, the dispositions of animals, the behaviour or activity of minute organ- isms. Nothing very mysterious there ! The farther down we go, the less familiar does the life of the other organisms become. But whose fault is that ? Are we to suppose that we alone have a fully con- scious life, simply because our own kind of life is the only one we can fully grasp and comprehend ? Take a lump of chalk and a lump of yeast. The one contains millions of minute shells which once were the homes of living and intensely active beings. The other contains millions of beings living even noiv. Who would suppose it ! Who even suspected it fifty years ago ! The air, the water, and the ground simply swarm with life, with minute invisible organ- isms which are capable of living for months or years within larger beings, or hibernating in cold and drought till they find a more agreeable season. And why draw the line there ! Who knows but that some future biologist, armed with optical instru- ments a thousand times more powerful than ours, may discover evidences of " life " in the very mole- cules and atoms of matter ? Even if these consist of aggregations of hard geometrical solids, they may, as I have shown in " Two New Worlds," be the homes of untold numbers of infra-beings whose 24 WHAT IS LIFE? lives, being reduced in the same proportion in time and space, are probably not very widely different from our own. Is it not, then, natural and reason- able to assume that it is life, and not dead matter or blind force, which rules the properties and events of the " material " world ? Let us assume, at one bound, that the " laws of nature" are in reality the rules of conduct and interaction and co-operation of countless, living beings of all grades, and see whether we cannot found a new and truer and profounder philosophy upon that hypothesis. That a mass of individuals may develop certain uniform qualities resembling physical or chemical properties will, I think, be readily granted. A human crowd has been likened to a viscous liquid, which acquires a certain speed under the impulse of a certain propelling or attracting force, which streams most rapidly in the middle of the street, and offers a certain constant resistance which prevents its speed exceeding a certain maximum. An army of 100,000 men is dealt with as a compound con- taining a certain proportion or officers and men, and might be represented by a chemical formula such as ON 3 M go , when O stands for officers, N for non- commissioned officers, and M for men. A shoal of herrings, a swarm of locusts, a herd of sheep, are masses having a certain consistency, speed, impetus, and inertia, which would appear to us as such if our LIFE IN THE MASS 25 bodies, instead of being what they are, were magni- fied to the size of the earth. The smaller the individuals, the less able are we to detect individual differences. A lump of yeast appears to us no more alive than a lump of putty. Yet yeast consists of countless small and simple cells, a thousand million of them to the cubic inch. Could we, by a suitable reduction in size, lump the whole human race together in the space of a cubic inch, we should get something greatly resembling that shapeless lump of yeast. We should be able to determine its physical and chemical properties, its absorption of oxygen and evolution of carbonic acid, the decom- position of its food-stuffs, accompanied by a certain development of heat and energy. We cannot logically deny to the atom what we are already bound to concede to a particle of matter little larger than a molecule. It is true that the more minute the particle the less does any conceiv- able consciousness we may attribute to it resemble our own consciousness. But that is simply due to our own limitations. We know that atoms take an intense part in all the physical happenings of the universe. Every beam of light, every electro-mag- netic wave out of the myriads of waves crossing and recrossing every part of the universe brings some change, temporary or permanent, into the most intimate structure of the atom. It awakens some " response," some adaptation perhaps. The dis- 26 WHAT IS LIFE ? covery of radio-activity has even strongly suggested the idea that the " life period " of all atoms is limited ; that they evolve and devolve ; that ura- nium or actinium is the " parent " of radium ; that helium atoms are the offspring, spores, or buds of the atoms of radium or of the atoms of substances evolved from radium The smaller the scale and the vaster the number of individuals we have to survey the more " mechanical " or purely physical do their qualities or properties become. And so is eventually born the idea of " dead matter " — dead to us because its life is inaccessible and unintel- ligible to us, because we have no language under- stood in those remote regions, no key nor code of signals by which to communicate with their inhabitants. Yet we cannot doubt that those regions of life on the borderland have traditions and laws of their own. Every hydrogen atom is a small society held together by its own social laws, which make for its safety and stability, and do actually preserve it from disintegration for very long periods of time. This social system has become stereotyped among all hydrogen atoms, just as the shape of a man or a horse has become stereotyped. Whether hydrogen atoms reproduce their own kind we cannot say. If we had nothing but a lump of yeast and no micro- scope, we could not possibly say whether yeast cells reproduced their kind or not. The process would SOCIAL LIFE OF ATOMS 27 be lost in the average. If the life of the " adult " hydrogen atom were a million times as long as its " childhood " there would not at any time be more than one " young " hydrogen atom in a million. It would be lost in the crowd, and we should declare birth and growth to be absent among hydrogen atoms. We see, then, that mechanical, physical, and chemical properties may quite conceivably originate in social systems obeying laws which we could de- scribe as social, moral, or intellectual laws. We, in our turn, utilise the uniformities so established to further our own purposes. We observe those laws, study them, make them part of ourselves, and so proceed to rule and control matter. We " stoop to conquer." It matters little to us why hydrogen, oxygen, or iron atoms have certain properties so long as those properties suit our purposes and can be relied upon. If these atoms are living beings it is no concern of ours. All we ask of them is that they shall perform certain functions in the place which we assign to them, like a horse harnessed to a cart, or a pack of hounds brought out to a hunt. The " life " of atoms is not perceptibly affected by what we do with them. They may pass through the most passionate convulsions of feeling without our being able to influence them, or even to detect any such crises. Similarly, the human soul may pass through 2 8 WHAT IS LIFE? the most violent crisis without perceptibly affecting the shape and general mechanical properties of the body, and, for aught we know, some beings on a larger scale than ourselves may be at the present moment utilising the average mechanical properties of the human race without our being aware of it. Even if we were, the individual effects upon ourselves might be much less formidable than, say, the effect of the weather, and we might be quite willing to agree to such a utilisation. These considerations suggest the following set of new definitions which shall form the basis of our researches into the possi- bilities and nature of immortality : — 1. Life is the interaction between living beings. 2. Matter is the aggregate of living beings belonging to universes inferior to our own. 3. The laws of nature are the social laws of the inferior universes. No. 1 may be criticised as being in effect a tautology. That is so, but it is inevitable. It simply illustrates the fact that life is a funda- mental thing incapable of being reduced to any- thing more fundamental. As regards No. 2, the word "inferior" does not imply moral or intellectual inferiority, but simply dimensional inferiority. An " inferior world " is a world whose atoms (indivisible or prac- tically undivided) are of a smaller order of magnitude than those of our own universe. The NEW FOUNDATIONS 29 "infra-world" is the universe next below ours in this series. The order of living beings with which we may " interact " is not stated in the above defi- nition. In fact, the order varies. When we com- municate with beings of our own order, we live socially in our own universe. When we do mechanical work, we utilise the social order of the infra-world to improve our position in our own. When we do physiological work, as in eating or drinking, we utilise the social laws of the infra- world to improve the social mechanism of that part of the infra-world appropriated to our private use, viz. our body. We build our earthly dwelling- place not on the ruins of other worlds, but on their triumphs and their permanences. CHAPTER III THE BUSINESS OF LIFE Every child born into this world is in a sense an angelos, a messenger. It is as if each of us were sent forth, with a definite charge and purpose, with instructions to proceed along a certain path and take a certain course of action. Whatever may be the difficulties in the way, the task will be attempted, or the faithful messenger will die in the attempt. With an astonishing punctuality and conscientiousness certain parts of the appointed work will be carried out at the time prearranged. Nor will the work be done unwillingly or grudg- ingly. On the contrary, its performance will be accompanied by the keenest joy, its omission with poignant regret. Of all the impulses which control human action, the impulse to carry out the pre- destined task is the most powerful. When it is accomplished, the messenger takes his leisure, lingering by the way and pursuing those objects which seem most desirable to his own more characteristic and original fancy. After some further interval, the messenger voluntarily dis- appears from the scene of his earthly activities, THE BUSINESS OF LIFE 3 1 bringing them to a close within a certain maximum time limit which is seldom exceeded. What is this life-work which is carried out with such astonishing devotion ? It is what is usually called the physical life of the organism. It is a form of life full of the most intense and varied activity, a " strenuous life " more worthy of the name than the business life of the busiest statesman or financier. Consider for a moment the work that has to be carried out by every human being from his earliest inception until maturity. An invisibly small germ cell, itself con- sisting of a thousand million complex molecules, has to be gradually subdivided and further divided until it produces an aggregate of 20,000 billion cells, each not only fulfilling its appropriate function in the organism, but ready to take a certain line of development consistent with the predestined development of the organism as a whole. These cells have to be developed by segmentation according to well-defined laws. Their materials have to be laboriously collected, sifted, moulded, and put in their proper places. The power necessary for the cell functions has to be got in from outside. For this purpose fuel has to be imported, burnt in a special place, and its energy transported into the most outlying regions. Waste materials must be removed and replaced, and the introduction of noxious matter guarded against. Damage must 32 THE BUSINESS OF LIFE be repaired, and tatigue must be followed by rest. All this vast activity must be carried on syste- matically and ceaselessly, and with, scrupulous regard to the laws governing the materials worked upon. This marvellous process goes on every day before our eyes, though, like every process to which we are accustomed, it does not strike us as marvellous. It is not the unexplained, but the exceptional and unusual, that strikes us with wonder. As a result of nine months of such intense activity, the newly born human babe finds itself provided with a complete digestive, circulatory, respiratory, and locomotor apparatus with which it can face the task of adapting itself to its proper functions in the world. The apparatus is there. It must now be developed in detail, adapted to its special circumstances, and prepared for its special destiny. The physiological work before the baby between birth and maturity is not as formidable as that which it has already accomplished. The rate of creation of new structures and tissues is retarded. Development takes place along lines already marked out. It is a period of growth rather than creation. The apparatus already fashioned is exercised and strengthened. The skater, having found his feet, now endeavours to acquire security, speed, elegance, and special accomplishments. The bicyclist, having acquired his machine and found his balance, MASTERING THE MECHANISM 33 proceeds to familiarise himself with the various peculiarities of the sport, and tests and develops his newly acquired powers. So the infant waves his arms and tramples his legs, fills his lungs and delights his own ears with the trumpet sounds of his own voice. Having found everything sound and in good order and repair, he proceeds farther on his appointed road, and enters into communication with surrounding beings of his own species. These are at first nothing but sources of warmth or food supplies, and barely distinguished from their inanimate surroundings. But it gradually dawns upon the consciousness of His Infantine Highness that there is some purpose and intention, some gleam of intelligence in the multicoloured objects he so often perceives before him. They respond to his needs, to his will. They emit sounds not quite unlike those he is himself capable of producing. He imitates them, and gradually finds that certain agreeable processes follow the emission of parti- cular sounds, and that these processes undergo a certain regular variation on varying the sounds in a special manner. And so he acquires the gift of language. Up to this, his experience has been entirely personal. There was nobody to tell him how to accomplish the arduous task of building up a vastly complicated organism. It had to be accomplished c 34 THE BUSINESS OF LIFE entirely by his own organic intelligence, aided by the prenatal impulse which sent hirn forth as an angelos into this world. The acquisition of language places him in touch with the accumulated experience of humanity, and gives him an enlarged sensorium, a wider personality. He begins to see with the X eyes of others, and hears with their ears. This new power exerts upon the infant an extraordinary and far-reaching effect. Henceforth, his own ex- periences are registered by the stereotyped formulae of language. What they lose in personal vividness they gain in generality and in permanence. They now become, potentially or actually, part of the sum of general human consciousness. As such, they acquire a certain dignity and value. They are like the acknowledged wit, more appreciated because generally accepted and recognised. These elements of memory, clothed and embodied in words, repeated from mouth to mouth, and recalled again and again, form themselves into a new and special kind of consciousness, a conscious- ness which, from its greater stability (due to its wider human basis), is invested with a special importance, just as a casual phrase becomes more imposing by being engrossed on vellum and framed. Gradually this new consciousness is associated with all the normal social activity of the child. It becomes essentially the social consciousness. But being in close relation with (and largely governed GRADES OF CONSCIOUSNESS 3 5 by) the consciousness of others, and thus clearly distinguished from the incoherent and irresponsible consciousness of dreams, it becomes colloquially known as the " waking consciousness " or the con- sciousness proper. Then what becomes of the " organic intelligence," that wonderful master-builder which built up the complex machinery of the human organism out of the miscellaneous materials supplied to it ? It shares the fate of all forms of consciousness which become superfluous or habitual. It sinks "below the threshold." In the same measure as an act becomes habitual, so does it become less | conscious. The memory is still there, and so is the power to utilise the memory. But not requiring a new effort of will, a new application of attention, it ceases to emerge into the open. A budding pianist will expend a great deal of conscious effort on the task of placing the fingers correctly on the keys, on giving the proper touch, on keeping the prescribed time. The accomplished player will perform a hundred separate musical actions every second with barely a trace of conscious effort. Reverse the succession of the keys from right to left, and the most brilliant pianist will have to begin his training all over again. In games played with a ball this development is equally marked. After a little training, the various actions and attitudes become " instinctive," as much 3 6 THE BUSINESS OF LIFE so almost as the instinct which makes the lungs breathe and the heart beat. Still, most pianists recall their early struggles with the stubborn keys. The process of learning has remained potentially a part of the waking con- sciousness. But we do not remember having learnt to walk or to speak, not to mention breathing or taking food. This, however, does not necessarily mean that these processes never were conscious. It simply means that they never were part of our social consciousness, i.e. that our experiences at that time were never clothed in words, never embodied in the audible material of the aggregate human consciousness. That we cannot recall our early efforts of organic body-building does not prove that those efforts were not supremely conscious. Our waking consciousness is continually losing material which is found to be useless or detrimental to the normal business of life. How much more will this apply to the organic prelingual consciousness ! That the organic consciousness, however, retains its activity is made evident by the continued de- velopment of the body. It grows in all its parts, and its organic development goes hand in hand with the development of the social consciousness. The earlier years of boyhood and girlhood are characterised by a very intense activity in the social consciousness. The restless questionings of child- hood, its remarkable mental acquisitiveness, offer THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS 37 some sort of parallel to the intense physiological activity of embryonic life. And in fact the social consciousness is building up a complete set of mental organs, emotional, intellectual, and voli- tional, ready for the next great stage in the journey of life. The transition to maturity is man's birth into the social world, just as his physical birth is his emer- gence into a separate physical existence. In both cases, organs recently acquired and developed are tested and exercised. In the young man we find the awakening of ambition and enterprise, associated often with a wide sympathy, a valiant optimism and idealism, a tendency towards self-sacrifice for the benefit of a community. In the young woman we have a greater development of the social instincts and affections, a desire for a deeper spiritual life, a readiness for self-surrender awaiting the appropriate stimulus. The wide range and fulness of this period of life is attributable to the fact that both the organic consciousness and the social consciousness are supremely active, the former in adapting the organism to its wider social purposes and possi- bilities, the latter exercising the newly acquired mental organs of social life, and feeling its way vaguely towards a personal character and individual consciousness. That this change towards maturity occurs with very tolerable precision about the fourteenth year 38 THE BUSINESS OF LIFE is another proof that the organic consciousness neither sleeps nor slumbers. It is another evidence of the faithfulness with which the angelos goes through the predetermined stages of his journey. It is absolutely no explanation of this almost miraculous coincidence to speak of " hereditary tendencies " or of " instinct." Things cannot be explained by simply giving a name to them. Much less is it an explanation to speak of the chemical properties and necessities of a given aggregation of cells. Every one knows that chemical equilibrium is timeless. Every chemical or physical change can be accelerated or retarded at will by a suitable variation of the supply of energy. These funda- mental vital changes are quite independent of the supply of energy. They will take place at substantially the same age in various climates on different diets, and under widely diver- gent standards of living. " Their parallel is not found in chemical reactions, but in psychical phe- nomena like hypnotic suggestion, or in the familiar experiment of determining to wake up at a certain time. That this time is hit upon almost to the minute in eight cases out of ten (a very common experience) cannot possibly be explained without having recourse to a faculty of the organic con- sciousness which is capable of exactly appreciating time, and recent experiments in post-hypnotic suggestion have proved that this unconscious EXTENSION OF PERSONALITY 39 measurement of time is exceedingly accurate and apparently endowed with powers of minute calcu- lation. 1 The social or " waking " consciousness meanwhile prepares to tackle the problems of life, to increase the sum of human experience, and to enlarge the resources of the race. The " business of life " acquires more of its ordinary acceptation. The civilised man enters upon a complex inheritance conveyed to him chiefly through the medium of written and spoken language. The wealth of this inheritance fully compensates him for the loss of direct organic consciousness ; for the organic con- sciousness, however resourceful and successful, has limits of its own. These limits can only be trans- gressed by bringing into action the higher social consciousness acquired by the human race in its ceaseless battle with nature. This higher con- sciousness nowadays implies an enormous extension of most of the elementary faculties and powers developed by the organic consciousness. Man takes up the sense organs as provided by " nature " (his own organic consciousness), and develops them a thousandfold. The limit of vision is pushed back into the remote regions of space. Things that are far are brought near. Small things are made large. The apparently simple and structureless turns out 1 See Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, Oct 1907. 40 THE BUSINESS OF LIFE to be a maze of delicate organisation. Invisible radiations are discovered. Light, visible and in- visible, is made to record its own structure, and intimate secrets of matter are brought to light by the analysis of its vibrations. Hearing is extended over hundreds of miles, and fugitive sounds are fixed in waxy substances ready for repetition as required. Analysis by smell and taste is replaced by the most delicate and diverse chemical reactions. But it is the sense of touch, and more especially muscular action, that experiences the most astound- ing extension. Every tool, instrument, or weapon is a development and extension of the corresponding organ, and more especially of the hand. Man is hundred-eyed and hundred-handed. A knife is a detachable modified finger-nail or tooth of superior power. A stone or bullet or hammer is a detached fist of superior impact and penetration. A pump is but the hollow hand prolonged and amplified. Cloths are modified and removable skin and hair. Man's personality does not end at the limits of his body. Whole portions of matter outside him belong to it. Whatever man controls is part of his personality. What a community controls is part of the larger " personality " of the community. In establishing himself in the world, man aims at enlarging his personality and safeguarding it. He builds himself a house to safeguard his food- CIVILISATION 4 l supplies and economise their consumption, but more especially in order to simplify his organic life. As his waking or social consciousness requires a larger sway, so the organic consciousness tends to sink farther and farther below the threshold. Man brings the accumulated experience of his race to bear upon the problems of his food-supply, his safety, his comfort. Civilisation means the simpli- fication of life, the more direct sway of the con- scious will. Civilisation tends to make the supply of man's organic needs automatic, in order to give freer play to his higher social talents. In this respect it simply carries the process of human growth a stage farther than " nature " carries it. Health, wealth, and wisdom are considered the three greatest gifts of this world. Health is the equilibrium of the organic life, the adequate re- sponse of physical circumstance to predetermined development, the successful carrying out of the pre- natal commission. Wealth is the successful ex- tension of the human personality over a wide range, the freer play of the will, the greater command over matter, the enhanced power of resistance to unfavourable circumstance. Wisdom is the health of the social consciousness, the capacity of design and initiative in the social and material world, the clearness of mental vision. The business of life is to secure these for ourselves and for our larger selves. For the "self" of the 42 THE BUSINESS OF LIFE socially normal man is not limited to his own body or wealth. It is a varying entity, extending over other persons " near and dear " to him, acquiring perhaps a wider range, possibly co-extensive with his race or state or nation. "Unselfish devotion" is really a devotion to a wider self. Selfishness in the wider sense is not only a vital necessity ; it is a virtue. When any one's feelings are so engaged in another person's welfare and happiness that an in- jury to the latter is felt as a pain in the former, a tendency to guard against that injury is " selfish " as regards the combined self of the two, and " un- selfish " as regards the first-named individual. This is a simple and somewhat obvious solution of the old problem as to the possibility of " unselfish- ness." Consider the working day of a business man, and translate his successive activities into more philo- sophic language. Wash and Dress. — He ensures the frontiers of his physical organism against intrusions of extraneous matter, whether organic or inorganic. He protects those same frontiers from such intrusion or other damage by surrounding them with a modified skin constructed with special regard to possible adverse contingencies. Breakfast. — He stores up within his organism certain kinds of organised matter from which his organic consciousness is able, with the aid of ex- A DAYS WORK 43 perience (inherited or acquired) to derive energy and to replace waste material. Business. — He endeavours to benefit other people, so that in turn they may benefit him. He acquires money, i.e. a universally recognised certificate of benefit rendered, which he in turn is empowered to transfer in recognition of some benefit received. He endeavours to put himself in such a position that he may confer benefits rapidly and more or less unconsciously, so as to acquire the largest possible number of " certificates " with the least expenditure of energy. Family Life. — He cultivates the larger con- sciousness which extends over all the individuals in his household, endeavouring to harmonise its development with the dictates of his own wisdom, or enjoying the free exchange of mental life and the growth of the aggregate self of the family. Social Life. — In the social sphere, the family life becomes more or less " subliminal " or unconscious. The man feels with the larger self of the society he frequents. If ambitious, he seeks to embody the will, rather than the emotion, of this larger social self. Politics. — His " self " now extends all over his country. He becomes a unit, a cell, in a higher organism, and, according to his talents, becomes part of its system, whether its digestive department (industry), its circulation (commerce), its respiration 44 THE BUSINESS OE LIFE (post, railways, &c), its nervous system (press), its musculature (armed forces, police), or its bones (law). If he has special qualities or qualifications, he may aspire to become a brain cell, and govern the country through laws, emotions, or ideas. Sleep. — In sleep, our busy man returns to his prenatal state, in which his organic consciousness, awake as ever, repairs the machinery it designed before birth and never ceased to construct or re- construct every night since. The enjoyment of life consists chiefly in the exercise of faculties newly acquired or too little used. These faculties may be physical (i.e. acquired and controlled by the organic consciousness), or social (acquired and controlled by the waking con- sciousness), or a combination of both, which gives the greatest enjoyment of all. Our dearest dreams of happiness are those of a position in which we can exercise a number of untried faculties, be the recipients of great benefits and the source of the same to others. Such is the healthy child's dream of bliss. If the present outlook is gloomy, if the faculties are overtaxed, the body and mind over- burdened, our dream of happiness is more negative, more concerned with rest and peace. The happy life is that in which power is neither overstrained nor left unemployed, a harmonious and progressive development and exercise of all the faculties. From day to day we are engaged in three HAPPINESS 4 5 different kinds of activities : constructing, exercising, and using the materials of life. From the date of our conception, from the very origin of our mundane existence, we are fashioning apparatus and ma- chinery wherewith to carry on the operations of life. This apparatus may consist of bodily organs, of language and book-learning, or of connections with larger centres of social life. In each case we first acquire or construct the apparatus. In the next stage we exercise it — a most delightful and more especially youthful experience, but open to the adult also who gets a new motor-car or comes into some property, &c. In the third stage we use the apparatus, information, or connection unconsciously, as when we walk and eat, or speak our mother tongue, or exchange hospitalities. The degree of un- consciousness with which the complicated machinery of life is manipulated is a rough and ready gauge of what is called " social status." The upper classes are those who can let the more commonplace de- tails of life sink below their level of consciousness. But essentially one can hardly speak of " higher " or " lower " activity. In many respects the " organic consciousness" is far superior to the waking conscious- ness in its resources and attainments. The structure of the humblest moss is a permanent reminder of this significant fact. And whether we are organising a baby body or a joint-stock company, our activity is essentially the same. It is the constructive stage 46 THE BUSINESS OF LIFE and element of life in general. The difference lies in the kind of material we handle. In one case we have supplies of colloid aggregates of molecules of different complexities to organise in the way of cells ; in the other case we have to weld a number of associations of human proprietors into a larger organic unit. One man gives an army the order to " march." Another whistles to his dog. A third takes up his pen and writes. In each case an action is performed in order to produce a certain effect, with a reasonable certainty that such an effect will ensue to the in- dividuals concerned. The importance of the action may vary greatly. None of the three know what ultimate effects may follow upon their action, and its effect upon themselves may vary within an in- definitely wide range. The activity of any single individual at any instant of his life is immense. It includes, of course, all his unconscious organic activity. It is sleepless and ceaseless. When we, with our im- perfect standards of activit}^, speak of a man being reduced to inactivity by disease, we commit a gross blunder. The disease itself is probably a gigantic effort of the organic consciousness to throw off some malign influence. That a man can effectually superintend the work- ins: of several thousand billion cells seems incredible. But then we must remember that by " a man " we do not mean a being whose only conscious- THE REAL MAN 47 ness is the little flicker of " waking " consciousness, itself comprising at any moment but an insignifi- cant fraction of his total waking memory, but a being with a consciousness extending and working over the whole range of his personality, whether " instinctively " or deliberately. That being does not, like the former, go out of existence every time he goes to sleep, but simply turns his atten- tion to vital processes founded at a time of life when he could not speak, and before words or other social symbols could be used to bring these processes within the purview of the ordinary waking (or social) memory. This is the real man, a being endowed with a stupendous memory and activity, and with almost unlimited command over vital and even physical processes, a man such as only rare illumined geniuses are ever aware of being, but which we all arc, though we know it not. The normal life of man, or of any species of plant or animal, is like a practicable road made by long centuries of ancestral pioneering. This road has been constructed by those who went before us, and is kept in repair and improved perhaps by the efforts of our contemporaries. A current of life wells up constantly from the immeasurable sea of existence, and pours into the accustomed channels. Every minute of our lives some new human being commences the journey of life, treads the well- worn road, and follows in the footprints of his 48 THE BUSINESS OF LIFE ancestors. Some find out new paths for them- selves, but such pioneering work is difficult and dangerous, and often leads to disaster. Such failures tend to preserve the uniformity of the species. Youth is not original, but imitative. Originality is mostly confined to the intellectual sphere, or to the higher social consciousness, and this only develops later in life, when the organic consciousness, having done its constructive work, falls more and more into a subordinate position. From the cradle to the grave, life is a perpetual expansion of consciousness. In early youth we test and enlarge our physical powers, and lay the foundations of our mental equipment. 1 Later on we develop our social gifts and memories. In the last stages of life, the normal tendency is towards " wisdom," a translation of our whole experience into the language of our social or waking conscious- ness, its formulation in terms of the common language which embodies the thoughts of the social Avorld about us. And then, in due time (and sometimes earlier) comes death. That stream of molecules which we call the body runs dry. The instrument which has placed us in contact with the visible universe 1 This distinction between "physical" and "mental" is con- venient, but it must not blind us to the fact that all powers are mental in the wider sense, i.e. parts of our full (organic and social) consciousness. THE QUESTION 49 withers away. The perpetual process of renewal and repair slackens and finally ceases. The clock- work, no longer wound up from day to day, runs down and stops. The ancestral road ends on the seashore. What then ? CHAPTER IV THE MECHANISM OF LIFE " The study of life belongs to chemical physics." — Le Dantec. Oue conclusion (p. 28) that life is an interaction between living beings, carried on mainly by utilising the social laws of an inferior universe (which social laws we call " the laws of nature ") enables us to go all the way with those biologists who wish to reduce the mechanism of life to physics and chemistry. It is by these sciences that we carry out all material improvements in our surroundings, and it is by physics and chemistry, by our organic familiarity with their laws, that we construct the physical basis of our lives. From our earliest independent existence onwards we utilise the laws of nature as we find them for the purpose of building up our bodies. These bodies are, however, highly differentiated structures, adapted to the pursuit of a number of special activities. The human skeleton is a system of struts and levers designed to give rigidity, strength, and mobility to the body. The tendons and muscles are structures which store the necessary energy for the various movements in a form in which it can be So THE MECHANISM OF LIFE 5 1 made instantly available on receipt of a signal from the controlling centre. These signals are trans- mitted by a system of lines called nerves, whose structure and functions closely resemble a tele- graphic network of great complexity. In this manner the fundamental necessity of motion is provided for. But Ave require much more than that. We want not only an organism capable of moving in a desired direction or producing motion in other objects — we must be kept constantly informed of the state of our surroundings, in order to determine what kind of motion will be most advantageous to us. We require a delicate instru- ment for detecting the emanations of surrounding objects. We require another for analysing the waves of elastic displacement which impinge upon us, and yet another for analysing the waves of electro-magnetic energy which pervade the space around. And so we provide ourselves with a nose and ears and eyes. Nor is this enough. The energy accumulated in the substance of our muscles is not unlimited. It requires renewal. If we were plants, we might take the necessary energy direct from the sunlight. But that source is too precarious for practical pur- poses, and it is much simpler, as well as more certain and more economical, to take the energy from lower organisms, plants by preference, which spend most of their time collecting it for us. All 52 THE MECHANISM OF LIFE we have to do is to provide ourselves with a port- able laboratory where the energy accumulated by plants or by inferior animals may be converted into a form suitable for our own mechanism. Hence our digestive system. The finished product of that digestive laboratory must then be taken to the very doors of all our subordinate mechanicians, and the waste products must be removed. This necessitates a heart and a circulation of the blood. That portion of the produce of the digestive labo- ratory which is to serve as fuel must be exposed to a slow combustion and supplied with a constantly renewed quantity of air. Hence our lungs and respiration. And finally, all this elaborate machinery must be closed in, to guard it against hostile in- fluences and give it consistency. Sentinels must be placed at the outposts to warn us of the state of our immediate surroundings, and specially delicate or sensitive districts must be specially protected. Hence our skin, and hair, and sense of touch. And so we get that miracle of mechanism, the human body, controlled by a central exchange to which all the wires converge, the brain. And within that brain, invisible to all prying eyes, sits Ego, the self, receiving every second a thousand million messages, answering them with an astonish- ing industry and despatch, and getting through an amount of business which might well be the envy OUR ORGANISATION 53 and despair of the most strenuous New York business house. The manifold calls which may be made upon every part of the organism necessitate a localised adaptation which expresses itself in a certain amount of decentralisation. The whole body is divided into minute districts, each of which is divided off from the rest and leads, to some extent, an independent life, looking to its own growth and food-supply, and fitting itself for its special function in the life of the whole. These districts are called "cells," and the adult human body contains some 25,000,000,000,000,000 of them. So small are they that twenty of them are contained in the thickness of a finger-nail. And yet each cell is itself a mechanism consisting of much more minute parts. If Ave go right down to the atoms, we find that the smallest living cell contains over 100,000,000 of them. But these are not distributed at random through the cell, but built up into structures of great complexity, structures which have a " colloid " or gummy con- sistency, and are supposed to be made up of com- plex but more or less regularly constituted chemical molecules. The human body has therefore aptly been called " a mechanism of mechanisms of mech- anisms " ; in other words, a mechanism of cells, which are mechanisms of colloid bodies, which again are mechanisms of complex molecules. Imagine, then, for a moment what it means to be 54 THE MECHANISM OF LIFE in actual effective possession of such a marvellously complex instrument. Here is a whole world of cells, numbering as many individuals as the aggre- gate human race has produced for the last million years, but all existing and flourishing at the same time, and working together towards the one purpose of placing the human self in contact with the material universe. How the individual cells play their part in the life of the whole organism is luminously expounded in Dr. E. B. Wilson's classical treatise on "The Cell" 1 (pp. 58-61). " In analysing the structure and functions of the individual cell we are accustomed, as a matter of convenience, to regard it as an independent elemen- tary organism or organic unit. Actually, however, it is such an organism only in the case of the unicellular plants and animals and the germ-cells of the multicellular forms. When we consider the tissue-cells of the latter, we must take a somewhat different view. As far as structure and origin are concerned the tissue-cell is unquestionably of the same morphological value as the one- celled plant or animal ; and in this sense the multicellular body is equivalent to a colony or aggregate of one-celled forms. Physiologically, however, the tissue-cell can only in a limited sense be regarded as an independent 1 Columbia University Biological Series. Macmillan Company, New York, 1904. CO-ORDINATION 5 5 unit ; for its autonomy is merged in a greater or less degree into the general life of the organism. From this point of view the tissue-cell must in fact be treated as merely a localised area of activity, pro- vided it is true with the complete apparatus of cell- life, and even capable of independent action within certain limits, yet nevertheless a part and not a whole. " There is at present no biological question of greater moment than the means by which the in- dividual cell-activities are co-ordinated, and the organic unity of the body maintained ; for upon this question hangs not only the problem of the transmission of acquired characters, and the nature of development, but our conception of life itself. Schwann, the father of the cell-theory, very clearly perceived this ; and after an admirably lucid dis- cussion of the facts known to him (1839), drew the conclusion that the life of the organism is essentially a composite ; that each cell has its independent life ; and that ' the whole organism subsists only by means of the reciprocal action of the single elementary parts.' This conclusion, afterward elaborated by Virchow and Haeckel to the theory of the ' cell- state,' took a very strong hold on the minds of biological investigators, and is even now widely accepted. It is, however, becoming more and more clearly apparent that this conception expresses only a part of the truth, and that Schwann went too far 56 THE MECHANISM OF LIFE in denying the influence of the totality of the organism upon the local activities of the cells. It would of course be absurd to maintain that the whole can consist of more than the sum of its parts. Yet, as far as growth and development are con- cerned, it has now been clearly demonstrated that only in a limited sense can the cells be regarded as co-operating units. They are rather local centres of a formative power pervading the growing mass as a whole, and the physiological autonomy of the in- dividual cell falls into the background. It is true that the cells may acquire a high degree of physiological independence in the later stages of embryological development. The facts to be discussed in the eighth and ninth chapters will, however, show strong reason for the con- clusion that this is a secondary result of de- velopment, through which the cells become, as it were, emancipated in a greater or less degree from the general control. Broadly viewed, therefore, the life of the multicellular organism is to be conceived as a whole ; and the apparently composite character which it may exhibit is owing to a secondary dis- tribution of its energies among local centres of action. " In this light the structural relations of tissue- cells become a question of great interest ; for we have here to seek the means by which the in- dividual cell comes into relation with the totality ORGANIC CONTINUITY 57 of the organism, and by which the general equili- brium of the body is maintained. It must be con- fessed that the results of microscopical research have not thus far given a very certain answer to this question. Though the tissue-cells are often appar- ently separated from one another by a non-living intercellular substance, which may appear in the form of solid walls, it is by no means certain that their organic continuity is thus actually severed. Many cases are known in which division of the nucleus is not followed by division of the cell-body, so that multinuclear cells or syncytia are thus formed, consisting of a continuous mass of proto- plasm through which the nuclei are scattered. Heitzmann long since contended (1873), though on insufficient evidence, that division is incomplete in nearly all forms of tissue, and that even when cell-walls are formed they are traversed by strands of protoplasm by means of which the cell-bodies remain in organic continuity. The whole body was thus conceived by him as a syncytium, the cells being no more than nodal points in a general reticulum, and the body forming a continuous protoplasmic mass. " This interesting view, long received with scep- ticism, has been to a considerable extent sustained by later researches, and though it still remains sub judice, has been definitely accepted in its entirety by some recent workers. The existence of protoplasmic 5§ THE MECHANISM OF LIFE cell-bridges between the sieve-tubes of plants has long been known; and Tangl's discovery, in 1879, of similar connections between the endosperm-cells was followed by the demonstration by Gardiner, Kienitz-Gerloff, A. Meyer, and many others, that in nearly all plant-tissues the cell-walls are traversed by delicate intercellular bridges. Similar bridges have been conclusively demonstrated by Ranvier, Bizzozero, Retzius, Flemming, Pfitzner, and many later observers in nearly all forms of epithelium ; and they are asserted to occur in the smooth muscle-fibres, in cartilage-cells and connective tissue-cells, and in some nerve-cells. Dendy (1888), Paladino (1890), and Retzius (1889) have endeavoured to show, further, that the follicle-cells of the ovary are connected by protoplasmic bridges not only with one another, but also with the ovum ; and similar protoplasmic bridges between germ-cells and somatic cells have been also demonstrated in a number of plants, e.g. by Goroschankin (1883) and Ikeno (1898) in the cycads and by A. Meyer (1896) in Volvox. On the strength of these observations some recent writers have not hesitated to accept the probability of Heitzmann's original conception, A. Meyer, for example, expressing the opinion that both the plant and the animal individual are continuous masses of protoplasm, in which the cytoplasmic substance forms a morphological unit, whether in the form of a single cell, a multi- WILSON ON CELL-BRIDGES 59 nucleated cell, or a system of cells. Captivating as this hypothesis is, its full acceptance at present would certainly be premature ; and as far as adult animal tissues are concerned, it still remains un- determined how far the cells are in direct proto- plasmic continuity. It is obvious that no such continuity exists in the case of the corpuscles of blood and lymph and the wandering leucocytes and pigment -cells. In case of the nervous system, which from an a priori point of view would seem to be above all others that in which protoplasmic continuity is to be expected, its occurrence and significance are still a subject of debate. When, however, we turn to the embryonic stages we find strong reason for the belief that a material continuity between cells here exists. This is certainly the case in the early stages of many arthropods, where the whole embryo is at first an unmistakable syncytium ; and Adam Sedgwick has endeavoured to show that in Pervpatus and even in the vertebrates the entire embryonic body, up to a late stage, is a continuous syncytium. I have pointed out (1893) that even in a total cleavage, such as that of Amphioxus or the echinoderms, the results of experiment on the early stages of cleavage are difficult to explain, save under the assumption that there must be a structural con- tinuity from cell to cell that is broken by mechanical displacement of the blastomeres. This conclusion is supported by the recent work of Hamniar (1896, 60 THE MECHANISM OF LIFE 1897), whose observations on sea-urchin eggs I can in the main confirm. " Among the most interesting observations in this direction are those of Mrs. Andrews (1897), who asserts that during the cleavage of the echinoderm- egg the blastomeres ' spin ' delicate protoplasmic filaments, by which direct protoplasmic continuity is established between them subsequent to each division. These observations, if correct, are of high importance ; for if protoplasmic connections may be broken and re-formed at will, as it were, the adverse evidence of the blood-corpuscles and wandering cells loses much of its weight. Meyer (1896) adduces evidence that in Volvox the cell- bridges are formed anew after division ; and Flem- ming has also shown that when leucocytes creep about among epithelial cells they rupture the protoplasmic bridges, which are then formed anew behind them. " We are still almost wholly ignorant of the precise physiological meaning of the cell-bridges ; but the facts indicate that they are not merely channels of nutrition, as some authors have maintained, but paths of subtler physiological impulse. Beside the facts determined by the isolation of blastomeres, referred to above, may be placed Townsend's recent remarkable experiments on plants, described at p. 346. If correct, these experiments give clear evidence of the transference of physiological influ- GRADES OF VITALITY 6 1 ences from cell to cell by means of protoplasmic bridges, showing that the nucleus of one cell may thus control the membrane-forming activity in an enucleated fragment of another cell. The field of research opened up by these and related researches seems one of the most promising in view ; but until it has been more fully explored, judgment should be reserved regarding the whole question of the occurrence, origin, and physiological meaning of the protoplasmic cell-bridges." This discovery of a probable " protoplasmic con- tinuity " gives us a new and vivid insight into the intimate structure of that marvellous apparatus which we call our body. The untold millions of individual cells are bound together by fine threads of that primitive jelly which we call protoplasm. The whole body is a " syncytium," an organised state or community of cells. Most probably the albuminous protoplasm, with its nuclei in every cell, represents the really essential part of the organism, the highest rank in the hierarchy of material mechanisms which link our inmost spiritual self with the outer world. We are familiar with the fact that many parts of our bodies are more essential, more " vital " than others. In his great work on modern war, Bloch draws a diagram of a man showing where wounds inflicted are " slight," where " severe," and where " fatal." The first areas are left white, the second 62 THE MECHANISM OF LIFE are shaded, and the last are black. The diagram presents the appearance of three beings, one inside the other, the black figure being the innermost. This diagram applies not only to the body as a whole, but to each individual cell of it. For in each cell we may distinguish an outer skin or covering, which may be classified as unessential in company with the storage and decomposition products ; an inner active " cytoplasm," in which the bulk of the physiological work is carried on ; and an innermost nucleus, the governing part of the cell, which decides its general activity, fixes the broad outlines of its development, and gives the first impulse towards division, if such is to take place. The forces which bring about the necessary harmonious development of this vast array of cells are the great outstanding riddle of physiology. And no wonder, for (as we have already seen) no physical explanation will ever explain anything, or can, in the very nature of things, be expected to do so. We cannot explain life in terms of death, or dead matter. For we know life by direct experience, but we have only a secondary knowledge of " dead " matter, and as for death, we do not know it at all. Failing a purely physical explanation of life, we have the various vitalistic theories, which distinguish between living and dead matter, organic and in- organic, as things sharply divided from each other, THE ORGANIC HIERARCHY 63 or as things which entered on a separate develop- ment at some remote age. This view, though more reasonable than the purely physical view of life, suffers from some fatal defects. The sharp division between living and dead matter is found to be non-existent. Much of human bone, hair, and skin is practically inorganic material, having no more life than an artificial tooth. On the other hand, Lehmann's " living crystals " and Stephane Led tie's " artificial plants " imitate so closely the most "vital" phenomena of life that we cannot say with any certainty where the line of demarcation must be drawn. And that line, if it were drawn to-day, would probably be obliterated to-morrow by new discoveries. No, we must take our courage in both hands, and prepare to go all the way, following the light of our unclouded intellect. There is nothing to fear. There is nothing so simple as truth, and when our reason is satisfied, our hearts will be at peace also. The living body is a vast army or hierarchy, with elaborately graded ranks, whose graduation is lost in the minute subdivisions of the infra-atomic universe. Each rank is alive with its own charac- teristic life, which, though not widely different from the life immediately above it or below it, has a tendency to appear fixed and mechanical to beings of a far higher rank, and vague and arbitrary to 64 THE MECHANISM OF LIFE the lower ranks. It is life, life, life, all along the scale. In moments of supreme consciousness there is in the healthy and fully developed human individual a free exercise of will and choice, a self-determina- tion towards a chosen line of development. No logical quibbles will explain that away. It is a primary fact of consciousness. Such a pure exercise of will may be exceedingly rare, but we can in practice approach it as closely as we please. To use an expression taken from geometry, we can approach it " asymptotically." There may always be a certain amount of unconscious impulse which makes for determinism, but that impulse may become more and more a negligible and im- measurably small quantity. We all " have it ,in us " to decide our own development, our own fate, by a free choice. But it must be a choice of practicable alternatives. The degree of practicability decides the will-power required, and that degree depends largely upon the forces at our command. A general may have two alternative ways of attack- ing the enemy. Both may be equally advisable or equally risky. He chooses, and the army obeys. But his powers are limited by his numerical strength, his commissariat, the training and morale of his troops, the enterprise of the home government, and other factors. Within those limits he has freedom of choice. So absolute is his power that he can FREEDOM OF CHOICE 65 send thousands of men to their death, and they go with a cheer to meet it. He thinks in regiments, squadrons, and batteries, as the admiral thinks in ships. The individual thinks, instead, in arms and legs, in fingers or lips or teeth, in eyes and ears. The details involved in the due execution of his orders he leaves to the nerves and muscles and bones concerned. They are well trained, and accustomed to obey. Each consists of millions of cells, accustomed to work together, each cell-nucleus controlling the proper metabolism of organic materials supplied by the " commissariat " to the individual cell, replacing waste material, and seeing that the work is properly performed. In doing so, the cell- nucleus, or rather the life-principle which it visibly represents, is no doubt aware of some kind of choice or will-power involved in such control. That choice, that self-determination, is the central aspect of the cellular " life " we have been driven to postulate. Each cell has a certain amount of " home-rule," circumscribed by the imperial interests of the organism as a whole. The consciousness of the cell is part of our " organic consciousness," that consciousness which built up our bodies from our prenatal days. The solidarity of the aggregate consciousness of the cells is probably maintained by something akin to " telepathy," whereby states of consciousness are transmitted to suitably attuned receivers. But just as, besides telepathy, we have E 66 THE MECHANISM OF LIFE visible and audible language, signals, telegraphs, and telephones, so the cellular system is provided with special contrivances designed to localise action and sensation. The telepathic control determines the general policy of the cells, whereas the nerve control carries out its details, and provides for special emergencies. The whole organism, then, may be compared to a kind of sponge of exceptionally fine grain, traversed by canals and fibres and strengthened in places by those jellies stiffened with lime and phosphates which we call bones. Countless varied actions can be executed by this admir- able mechanism, which surpasses any man-made machinery more than the most elaborate watch surpasses the flint arrow-head. And this whole machine is one. " In the individual," says Le Dantec, "there is no local phenomenon." The organism is like some palace whose every opening is filled with automatic alarms. Every part com- municates with every other. A pin-prick, a local pressure or tension, raises the temperature of the whole apparatus, and produces first, a concentration of attention on the spot, a feeling of uneasiness, and then a flow of blood towards the threatened quarter. The human organism is, in one respect, like the amoeba. It is a continuous mass of proto- plasm. But, unlike that most primitive of all animals, its parts are highly differentiated, and all DIFFERENTIATION OF PARTS 67 are under the control of the nervous system. It is useless to circulate food-stuffs through a muscle. It will not assimilate them except under the proper stimulus from its governing nerve. The differentiation of the various parts has the in- evitable effect of making some parts more " vital " than others. For those parts whose action is essential to the nutrition and government of the entire system are naturally of greater importance than those which are only called upon to perform special tasks. Thus, the heart, the lungs, the digestive apparatus, and the brains are the citadel of life, whose permanent injury means death. The limbs and sense organs can almost all be dispensed with before life must necessarily cease. And yet these latter are those upon whose activity our social life is most largely dependent. They are, in that sense, " higher " organs. But then we are familiar with the " bread-and-butter " argument which tells against many " higher " activities, and which finds but one more illustration here. The moral of it is that our present life is a stage preparatory to a higher form. Some animals, like the hydra, the starfish, the crab, the earth-worm, and the lizard may be cut to pieces, and each piece will, under suitable condi- tions of food-supply and temperature, grow into a complete adult animal. On the other hand, a small ciliated microscopic infusorian called para- 68 THE MECHANISM OF LIFE mtecia, when truncated, remains so, unless it is operated upon when very young. The renewing power appears, indeed, to be merely a matter of age. Every animal has a stage in its growth up to which it can restore any limb it loses. It is only when bones or other hard and permanent structures are formed that the organic conscious- ness loses the power of duplicating its own work. It is the price the organism has to pay for per- manence. We want to do things habitually, " in- stinctively," without having to think about it. We want certain parts of our organism to be unchang- ing, to be always at our immediate disposal, to be capable of withstanding or exerting a certain force. Well, we get what we want. We secure the services of certain combinations of hard substances, and place them in position. Once they are pro- vided, we forget all about the process by which they have been secured, and as their renewal is a matter of no urgency, we resign ourselves to leaving these hard materials in undisturbed possession of their assigned posts. But then we have to pay the penalty. And that penalty is — death. Could we, like the crab, shed our bones every now and then, we might prolong our life into thousands of years. But the crab's way of growing bones is not our way. We want ours inside instead of outside, so that we may re- tain our full and quick sensitiveness and mobility. WHY WE DIE 69 Moreover, the placing of the bones inside facilitates their own growth and their adaptation to the grow- ing organism. The primordial sin whose " wages is death " is the desire for a more spiritual life, for a larger and wider sphere of mental and emotional activity than that offered by a mere animal struggle for existence. The deathless amoeba is also sinless in this respect. Its whole consciousness is probably concerned solely with the problems of nutrition and multiplication. Its organic consciousness is co-extensive with its social consciousness. It has no " subconscious self," no areas of consciousness which but rarely emerge above the threshold. It does everything consciously and deliberately, nothing instinctively. It acquires no property in the way of permanent mechanisms, held in reserve for special occasions. It has nothing to outgrow, no dead matter accumulating in its tissues. It is called Proteus, because it can assume the most varied forms without endangering its anatomy. In fact, it has no anatomy. It is just a speck of jelly with a nucleus. That nucleus em- bodies the essential life-principle of the animal. Says Wilson 1 : " A fragment of a cell deprived of its nucleus may live for a considerable time and mani- fest the power of co-ordinated movement without perceptible impairment. Such a mass of proto- plasm is, however, devoid of the powers of assimila- ] "The Cell," p. 30. 70 THE MECHANISM OF LIFE tion, growth, and repair, and sooner or later dies. In other words, those functions that involve destructive metabolism may continue for a time in the absence of the nucleus ; those that involve constructive metabolism cease with its removal. There is, therefore, strong reason to believe that the nucleus plays an essential part in the con- structive metabolism of the cell, and through this is especially concerned with the formative pro- cesses involved in growth and development. For these and many other reasons, to be discussed here- after, the nucleus is generally regarded as a con- trolling centre of cell-activity, and hence a primary factor in growth, development, and the transmission of specific qualities from cell to cell, and so from one generation to another." There is no birth in the world of Proteus and no natural death. Multiplication takes place by the splitting of the nucleus, which is followed by that of the cytoplasm or cell-substance. This fission gives rise to two separate and independent indi- viduals, each of which shifts for itself. In the higher animals, and in the human being, there is in the earliest prenatal stages a similar fission. But instead of leading to total separation, this fission leads to a co-operative aggregation of cells, and eventually to the graded hierarchy already spoken of. The establishment of this graded hierarchy intro- REPRODUCTION 7 1 duces profound and significant changes into the method of propagation. The differentiation of the cells becomes " hereditary " in the sense of each cell reproducing, by fission, a cell of its own kind. Thus, an epithelial cell produces, by fission, two cells of epithelium. A nerve cell produces two nerve cells. But how is the whole individual to be reproduced ? As we have seen in some of the lower animals, every single cell retains the power of reproducing a whole individual. In the higher organisms such powers may exist in a latent form, depending upon the provision of external con- ditions which cannot practically be supplied, or which nobody has yet thought of trying. The mechanical, physical, and chemical conditions re- quired, for instance, to make a dog's ear, when cut off, develop into a dog, are quite unknown, or even impossible. The conditions would probably be so unusual that the result would be very different from the accepted notion of a dog, vague and wide though that notion be. The tendency to variation, which always exists, and sometimes leads to mon- strosities, must be checked unless the most valuable lessons laboriously learnt in the previous history of the species are to be thrown away. This danger is guarded against in the higher organisms by substi- tuting conjugation for simple fission. This conju- gation implies the union of the nuclei of two cells, leading up to their complete fusion, the " twain " 72 THE MECHANISM OF LIFE becoming " one," and then giving rise to one or more new individuals by fission. What conjugation is to the simpler organisms, sexual reproduction is to the more highly developed ones. The essential thing is that the vital portions, the nuclei, of two germ-cells should combine. The mechanism for producing such combination and safeguarding the results of it depend upon less important circum- stances. This essential equality between the sexes is strikingly borne out by an important recent dis- covery made by Van Beneden in 1883. Cell- division is usually (i.e. in all cases except those of degeneration or intra-cellular division of the nucleus) preceded by a striking phenomenon known as mitosis or karyokinesis. It is shown by the nucleus of the cell, or rather that fibrous part of the nucleus which easily takes up colouring matter and is therefore called chromatin, forming itself into a spireme or tangle of threads, which gradually thicken and shorten, and break up into a small but perfectly definite number of rods. These rods are called chromosomes. They arrange themselves in a straight line and split along their length, and each new cell takes up just half of the rods thus split to form its new nucleus. Every species of plant and animal has a fixed number of chromosomes. " In some sharks the number is thirty-six ; in certain gasteropods it is thirty- two ; in the mouse, the salamander, the trout, the lily, twenty- four ; in the WHAT IS MOST VITAL 73 worm Sagitta, eighteen; in the ox, guinea-pig, and in man the number is said to be sixteen, and the same number is characteristic of the onion." x Now in each of the germ-cells whose conjunction gives 'rise to the new individual, the number of chromosomes is exactly half the number found in the ordinary cells of the body. The germ-cells are thus equal and supplementary to each other. Their combination makes a complete cell, whose sub- division is capable, under suitable surroundings, of reproducing the entire individual. It has been suggested that the chromatin of the nucleus is the most vital and living part of each cell. Others have put forward a body called the " centrosome," a minute speck of matter which seems to be the first to divide, and forms two stars between which the chromosomes arrange themselves before splitting. But the most essential structure appears to be the " spindle," a web of fibres con- necting the two stars or " asters " with each other. This spindle does not take up colouring matter, and is therefore less visible under the microscope. In summing up a long discussion of the process of cell-division, Wilson says 2 : " These facts show that mitosis is due to the co-ordinate play of an extremely complex system of forces which are as yet scarcely comprehended. Its general significance is, however, 1 Wilson, " The Cell," p. 67. 2 Ibid. p. 120. 74 THE MECHANISM OF LIFE obvious. The effect of mitosis is to produce a meristic [part by part] division, as opposed to a mere mass-division, of the chromatin of the mother- cell, and its equal distribution to the nuclei of the daughter-cells. To this result all the operations of mitosis are tributary; and it is a significant fact that this process is characteristic of all embryonic and actively growing cells, while mass-division, as shown in amitosis, is equally characteristic of highly specialised or degenerating cells in which develop- ment is approaching its end." In this connection, it should be remembered that the most vital part of the cell is not necessarily the most clearly visible. In fact, there is no reason why it should be visible at all. The rivalry of the chromatin and the centrosome for pre-eminence may, for aught we know, be a mere illusion, pro- duced by peculiarities of refraction and absorption. The most essential governing parts of the cell may differ in quite other physical properties. Our eyes cannot distinguish readily between water and hydro- chloric acid and glycerine, and yet these substances are widely different in their chemical properties, and would look different to eyes sensitive to light of other wave-lengths. That we cannot definitely locate the sanctum sanctorum of the living cell may be a pure accident, or due to the lack of a suitable dye. It may be located to-morrow by some new chemical means. What concerns us is the proof AN INVISIBLE BODY 75 that every cell is highly differentiated with regard to the vitality of its parts. A nucleus weighs about a thousandth of the average cell-body. Its really vital, and perhaps invisible, portion may be a ten- thousandth of the weight of the cell. In other words, taking all the cells together, our real living matter, the vital portions of our body, may have an aggregate weight of about one-fifth of an ounce ! Could we eliminate all the rest of the cell material, we should have a " body " consisting of all that is most " alive " in every single cell. But that " body " would be quite invisible, and would, if it filled the outline of the body as before, ascend some fifteen miles into the air before it found a position of equilibrium. It would, indeed, live in a new world, hitherto " unseen," retaining all its social and organic memories and fulfilling all its essential functions except that of exerting force upon ponderable matter as we do with the help of our ponderous bones. To restore such a body to its ordinary mundane functions, it would suffice to enable the various cell-centres to resume then assimilating 1 activities for some little time. Such a withdrawal and restoration has nothing inconceivable about it. That something of the kind occurs at our own death, and that it is a possible, though perhaps unusual, process even in our ordinary life, I hope to make clear in the sequel. CHAPTER V THE LAWS OF NATURE " We assume the existence of uniformities in nature — natural laws : the narrowing down of these into exactitude being the endless problem of discovery, and the completest knowledge of them already attained at any period being, for that period, the basis of all explanation, prediction, and proof." — Alfred Sidgwick on "Fallacies." To some of us, the laws of nature are as the bars of a prison, shutting us off from freedom and the alluring delights of the world outside. To others, they are a refuge from the whirlpools and tornadoes on the sea of existence, or as guiding-stars through a dark and trackless forest. We are perpetually oscillating between the delights of possession and those of acquisition. We are conservative and radical in turn. When we have, we are glad of the limitations, safeguards, and guarantees offered by the immutability of the laws of nature and the majesty of the law of the land based on them. When we want, we feel keenly the restraint thus imposed upon us. We endeavour to remove it by discovering superior laws which allow the ex- ceptions desired by us. Science is that pursuit of knowledge which discovers and formulates the 7 6 THE LAWS OF NATURE 77 laws of nature. Every law so discovered imposes new restraints and limitations. Yet science is not essentially conservative. On the contrary, it is usually regarded as essentially radical and revolu- tionary, since it is constantly relegating long- cherislied beliefs to the limbo of exploded fallacies. Now, what exactly is a law of nature ? Who or what is the law-giver ? Who or what enforces it ? Can it ever be broken, or superseded, or revised ? These are the questions I shall endeavour to answer in this chapter. It is necessary to arrive at a clear conception of natural law before we can penetrate any distance into the unknown land which we are endeavouring to explore. Our daily life is based upon a number of im- possibilities and improbabilities. These are based upon " natural laws." We shut up a criminal in a dungeon with thick stone walls, iron bars, and ponderous locks. It is " impossible " for him to get out. Why ? because his muscular force " cannot possibly " attain the strength sufficient to burst his bonds. We present him with a problem which his physical and intellectual powers are incapable of solving. We rely upon the cohesive force of granite and steel to resist any force which he may bring- to bear upon his fetters. And so we keep him safely locked up, and if he escapes at all, it is usually not the fault of the natural laws we relied upon, but the fault of the jailer. 73 THE LAWS OF NATURE Again, we lay in a store of coal, having at the back of our mind quite an array of laws which we expect to hold good. Among these we may specify the following : coal does not decompose ; it does not fly away ; it " keeps " indefinitely, unless raised to a certain high temperature in the presence of oxygen ; when that happens, it burns and gives out heat. Other laws upon which we rely are more complex. The law of supply and demand, and the laws of political economy in general, hold good when taken over a wide area, though they fail in almost every case taken individually. In the widest sense, a natural law is any continuity or constancy we observe anywhere. "When we go to an hotel and proceed to dress and wash, we use the water as if it could by no possibility be sulphuric acid, or a solu- tion of potassium cyanide, or a diluted culture of cholera morbus, or other bearer of deadly peril. We rely upon the average honesty and kindliness and carefulness of man, or upon his fear of pains and penalties. In other cases, our sense of confidence and safety is still more precarious. We trust a friend, judging from his past actions, or the actions of persons resembling him. Because we have known him to show signs of manliness, or ability, or sympathy, we believe him to be manly, clever, and kind. We formulate, in fact, a provisional kind of natural law concerning him, or, if you like, an hypothesis, and HUMAN AND NATURAL LAW 79 act upon that until something (or somebody) dis- illusions us. We then recognise that the character we attributed to our friend was not a " reality," but an illusion. In other fields we are still less rational. In politics we vote for free trade or protection after a hasty generalisation from a few cases of pros- perity or poverty observed in connection with one or the other of these policies, sometimes reasoning from a single case imperfectly observed. And yet this most unscientific manner of reasoning and acting is expounded and advocated by the pick of the country's intellect and ability ! Little wonder that people turn from such fragile reeds to the more solid props offered by the laws ol nature discovered by science. Here the area of observation is immensely enlarged. Instead of a single nation or a few individuals, we have thou- sands of objects to judge from, objects which are, as a rule, accessible to everybody, so that our deductions can be verified by any one who has the inclination and the necessary leisure. This circumstance secures to the laws of nature a recog- nition co-extensive with the human race. Their great prestige, their " majesty " as it is sometimes called, often produces the erroneous opinion that they are unalterable and infallible. As a matter of fact, they are as changeable and as fallible as the human race itself. Not one of them embodies So THE LAWS OF NATUKE an eternal and changeless truth. Not one of them but must remain subject to revision. They are all approximate, some of them closely approximate as judged by our present standards, but no matter how they are formulated, they may have to be recast to-morrow. Take two of the most fundamental and universal laws known: Newton's law of gravitation, and the rectilinear propagation of light. Newton's law makes gravitation proportional to the attracting masses, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. But electrical ex- periments have recently shown that mass and inertia may depend upon speed, and molecular physics have long taught us that at very small distances the force varies more rapidly than with the square of the distance. Again, the rectilinear propagation of light is a kind of optical illusion due to the interference of innumerable wavelets. When the beam is very narrow, it may be dis- tinctly observed to spread out laterally, much as a sound-wave would. Take the law known under the name of biogenesis, which maintains that all living beings are derived from other living beings, and none from inanimate material. In spite of some apparent exceptions such as Burke's radiobes and Lehmann's " living crystals," this law still holds good. But how much longer will it hold good ? If such a law as that were OPEN TO REVISION 8 I endowed with all that majesty and sway which is sometimes attributed to it, what would happen if it ceased to be true ? Everybody knows, of course, the answer : things would remain much as they always were. There would be no cataclysm, no sudden upheaval. These laws are true for us, so long as they embody the results of our aggregate observation. None of these laws exist in nature objectively, apart from the human intellect. The chemist maintains for several generations that " atoms are indivisible and indestructible." Then a physicist comes along and proves that atoms can be both split and destroyed. The world, which appeared to base its whole existence on the chemist's formula, remains profoundly indifferent. No, the laws of nature are of purely human origin, and of purely human importance. The processes which give rise to them — well, that is another matter. As Johnstone Stoney puts it, What we see moving is the shadow of some elaborate machinery. The machinery is invisible to us, but we see the shadows of some of its cranks and levers and cog-wheels. We observe that there is some sameness about the motions, that they seem to obey some law. We see a rod moving to and fro, and a wheel turning. We conclude that the rod turns the wheel, or rather (since both rod and wheel are invisible and un- known to us) that the shadow of the rod turns the F 82 THE LAWS OF NATURE shadow of the wheel ! That is all we are really concerned with, since the internal mechanism is inaccessible to us. Thus we formulate our " laws of nature." A superior being might come in and remove a spring or a catch in the machine, and then the rod would move without turning the wheel. Our " law of nature " would then have to be revised or abandoned, and the superior stranger would have proved that a wider law holds good. He again might be nonplussed by a still more gifted individual who, while leaving the catch un- touched, might establish some other connection, invisible to stranger No. 1, whereby the rod and the wheel would again move together and the original law of nature be restored ! Of these possibilities the advanced man of science is fully aware. Hence he is ceaselessly endeavouring to get at the internal mechanism of the universe, to learn all the secret springs and catches, and to control them himself. But no amount of analysis or mensuration of the shadows will ever enlighten us concerning the internal mechanism of the real machine. A surer way is to endeavour to construct a machine as best we can, or at least to consider its functions and the effects it is obviously intended to produce. A person ignorant of the watchmaker's art cannot expect to understand watchmaking by taking the watch to pieces and trying experiments with the HYPOTHESES 83 various wheels and pinions and springs. His best way is to enter, as far as possible, into the mind of the watchmaker, and find out the ideas underlying the connection of the various pieces of mechanism, seeing how this moves that, and how something keeps something else in position. The access to the secret chamber is through the man who holds the key thereof. We must learn " to think again the great thought of creation," before we may hope to fathom its inner secrets. This is not yet, however, the accepted method of scientific research. Far from it. The scientific method of to-day discourages speculation. It en- courages observation and experiment, and is frugal in the matter of hypotheses. The ruling fashion is to assume as little as possible, to be chary of theories, to state rather than explain facts. This fashion is the result of bitter experience of how premature theorising may retard discovery and the advance of knowledge. But since the function of a theory is not only to explain facts, but also to state and summarise them in a concise form, and since this latter function results in a distinct economy of thought, a sparing use of theory is indulged in. The British school is rather more prodigal of auxiliary images than the Continental school. But though the habit of framing theories is now some- what restrained in public, it is so ingrained in the human mind that it cannot be eradicated, and being 84 THE LAWS OF NATURE in the blood, it breaks out in all kinds of places, half unconsciously. This state of things is particularly apparent with regard to the subject of this book. Immortality has no place in any department of official science. The official theory is that there is nothing after death but annihilation. Even where that theory is not openly professed or acknowledged, or where it is not even consciously held, the bias is altogether against life after death. Such life, at the best, is treated as a " negligible quantity." And not only is this the case in official science, but in many other departments of human activity. The State still disposes of its worst and hopeless criminals by capital punishment, which is, in practically all cases, tacitly assumed to amount to annihilation. If the soul or spirit is referred to, it is done as a piece of conservatism, a concession to tradition or to ancient and not altogether extinct prejudice. Even the Church, by relegating the resurrection to a distant and ever-postponed resurrection morn, precludes the dead from all possibility of inter- course with us, and corroborates the official attitude of science and statecraft in a less direct but quite as effective manner. Thus has the internal aspect of nature been more and more lost sight of, and pure materialism, expressed or understood, actually holds the field of " practical politics." And should any one arise to MATERIALISM IN POWER 85 protest against this inversion of all the canons of logic and legitimate reasoning, and endeavour to bring about a saner and more fruitful policy in the world of thought, he will at once be met by out- cries against the reintroduction of medieval super- stition with all its horrors and barbarities ! Science has put forth its mailed fist. It has established a Pax Romano, among the warring creeds very much as the white man has confined the red or black native to his wigwam or his kraal. Finding that speculations concerning the soul of man led to more disorders and disturbances of the peace than anything else, it has decided to ignore that soul, or rather to shut it up in a barred cage called official psychology, whence it shall not escape to disturb the peace of mind of the materialist savant And so we find physics and chemistry and physiology and mental pathology, as well as the whole of medicine, calmly proceeding on the tacit assumption that life is an " epiphenomenon," a shadow of shadows, and that its existence, if not already accounted for on purely chemical principles, may be so accounted for to-morrow, or if not, then certainly the day after to-morrow. It somewhat re- minds one of the days of the French Revolution, when it was bad form to give hereditary or official titles, when everybody was citoyen this or citoyenne that, and Queen Antoinette was officially styled " la veuve Capet." But just as that affectation, 86 THE LAWS OF NATURE brought about by a violent swing of the pendulum, has since disappeared, giving way to a more dignified tolerance and independence, so, we may take it, will the rigid official boycott of the spiritual be relaxed when science feels sure of the safety of its fundamental and dearly bought principles. The next great development will be the opening of the new passage into the inner workshop of the universe, where the Master-builder sits at work. We must endeavour to liberate science from its materialistic fetters, to enable it to soar into brighter and higher realms. Just as, by breaking down some of the cast-iron conventions of orthodox algebra, Rowan Hamilton created the freer and more powerful calculus of quaternions, so must we now, by dissolving the prison bars of the material- istic convention, enable science to enter on a new inheritance, of which this visible and tangible world forms a significant but inadequate portion. In doing this, it is inevitable that the work should bear the well-known faults of pioneering efforts. It will have a scent and flavour of the backwoods about it. The results will be rough-hewn, the tracks will be primitive, and the axe of the wood- cutter will leave many an ugly stump behind it. But a beginning must be made sometime, and having proceeded as far as this, there is no turning back. the law-givers 87 Natural Legislation I have already, in "Two New Worlds/given reasons for believing that our material universe is really an infinite series of worlds within worlds having a certain numerical relation with each other. The argument there given proceeded on purely physical data. As our present task attempts the interpreta- tion of these physical data in terms of life (every other interpretation having been found to lead to inconsistencies) we must be prepared to encounter an infinite succession of orders of organisation. But just as the " atoms" of our world, in spite of explo- sions and reactions and test-tubes, are found to be nearly as free and independent in their movements as, say, our own earth, so, we may suppose, are the "souls" of the 100,000,000 atoms which make up the minute spore of a fungus largely independent of whatever " soul " that spore possesses. Yet some of these atoms may well be more beseelt (a convenient German word imperfectly rendered by be-soul-ed) than others, just as the earth, according to Sir A. ft. Wallace, is the only bearer of ordinary organic life in our stellar system. Thus, the human race may be that which fits the earth for becoming the most intellectual " atom " in our solar or sidereal system, and enables it thus to embody or represent a part of that vast o verso ul which sways the visible universe. 88 THE LAWS OF NATURE Defining a world as a system of discrete entities of the same order of magnitude and similar general attributes, we recognise that our faculties place us in relation with three material worlds. These are : — 1. The terrene - world, in which the discrete entities are organised beings, ranging from the lowest unicellular organism to the highest multi- cellular organism. 2. The supra - world, whose entities are the heavenly bodies, solar or planetary. 3. The infra-world, whose discrete entities are atoms and electrons. On our earth we are in .touch with all these worlds. Matter may be roughly divided into in- organic and organic matter, though there is no sharp line of demarcation. The organic matter is connected with the terrene - world, and the in- organic matter with the infra-world. The whole earth is an entity of the supra-world, and the stars and planets are its fellows and companions. In all the three worlds we have cognisance of a differentiation of types ; witness the " Evolution of Celestial Species," in which Sir Norman Lockyer classifies the stars by their spectra ; Darwin's " Origin of Species " on earth ; and the evolution of the chemical elements which bids fair to account for the genesis of the atoms of the various elementary substances — the species of the infra- world. LEGISLATION FROM BELOW 89 If we accept Darwin's view of evolution we must suppose that species are survivals of variations which have a particular fitness for the surroundings in which they are placed. Planets and satellites, comets and suns people the heavens because solid rings and cubes and spirals cannot long survive. Plants and animals assume definite forms because only such forms can thrive and multiply. [The others go to the wall. Atoms grow into definite sizes, shapes, and weights because others have in- sufficient stability. That stability is governed by laws of which we are as yet entirely ignorant, but if the atom as such has some kind of intelligence, that intelligence is faced by those infra-laws just as we are faced by the laws of chemistry and physics. It must utilise those laws and adapt itself to them or perish. We are not concerned with the infra-laws. All we have to do is to consider and obey the laws presented to us by the world of atoms — the infra- world. Modern researches into radioactivity have familiarised us with the conception of the birth, growth, and decay of atoms. Future investigations may well extend this by showing that atoms have a definite and measurable life-period and birth-rate, that, in fact, they are as much " living beings " as are bacteria, with the difference that their rate of life is some 5000 tunes faster, and their number a million million times greater. The effect on us of this numerical strength, and the rapidity with 90 THE LAWS OF NATURE which the phases of atomic life succeed each other, is that details get lost, and we are impressed with the general constancy and stability of the atomic species : — The laws of chemistry are the laws of life of the atomic species. This is said with regard to the origin and inter- action of chemical species as such. When there is no interaction, but only chance aggregates of atoms of the same or diverse species are considered, we get the laws of mechanics or physics. The differ- ence is just as if we considered cross-breeding, say, in one case, and the sufficiency of cattle-truck accommodation in another. The former would be terrene chemistry, the latter terrene physics. When we have to deal, not with atoms, but with higher aggregates of them, we get more complex laws. Atoms can only form societies under certain conditions, which we may call " conditions of mem- bership." Other forms of aggregation are no doubt occasionally devised, but they disappear owing to instability. And the higher we ascend in the scale of aggregation, the more complex do these con- ditions become, just as the machinery of a State becomes the more complicated the larger it grows- We get complex molecules, colloids, protoplasm, cells. Kesult : the laws of biology. SOULS WITHIN SOULS 9 1 And so are our laws of nature built up. They are the social laws of inferior ivorlds. Our laws of matter are the laws of an " infra-biology," the laws evolved by the interaction between living beings of an order very far below our own. Souls within Souls An obvious objection to the above reasoning is that it is a kind of rationalised materialism, in which the immutable laws of a mechanical nature are reduced to the no less immutable laws of a rather mechanical infra-society. But this objection ignores an equally obvious corollary of the same reasoning. There is no determinism. There is " free will " all along the line. The laws of nature, like human laws, are observed in the aggregate. Any member of any order of society is at liberty to transgress them, subject, of course, to the penalties given and pro- vided. Aggregation is free and voluntary. Obedi- ence and conformity are voluntary. Any aggregation of any order has a self-determining power strictly commensurate with its range of action and sphere of influence. All laws of nature are breakable, but they are practically unbroken. How closely social laws may simulate the generality of natural laws is seen in countless conventions of human society. What strange being, watching a crowd of 10,000 Europeans, would ever conclude or suspect that all 92 THE LAWS OF NATURE men, Europeans included, were born without hats, or, indeed, without any clothing whatever ? Or, if the generality of head-gear may be put down to natural causes, what causes but social laws can account for the male evening attire or the striking and simultaneous changes in feminine fashions ? But what is this same aggregation ? What bridges the gulf which separates every two in- dividuals ? Here we approach the next cross-road. Materialism lets the world consist of discrete particles, capable, in some logically inconceivable way, of interacting with each other. How on such a system any two things can ever become alike when there is any possibility of differentiation remains a mystery. Or how, granted a primordial uniformity, differences can ever arise, is equally mysterious. No, we must, in accordance with the principle of Economy, pro- ceed from the Known to the Unknown. The Known in this case is the interaction among our fellow- creatures. The Unknown is interaction in general. Human interaction is based upon a fundamental relationship known to biology as the continuity of the germ-plasm, but which from our point of view must be styled the Divisibility of the Human Soul. Just as the body of the apple is part of the body of the tree, so the soul of the apple is part of the soul of its parent, the soul of the infant part of the mother's soul. Omne vivum e vivo is one of the best- UNIVERSAL LIFE 93 established facts of biology. No life without previous life. Ultimately all living beings are our blood- relations, which means also our soul-relations. Let us be deliberate, courageous, and emphatic about the word " all." Since there is no dead matter, but all is life, our soul-stuff is co-extensive with the universe, and not with the visible and tangible universe only, but with the life that was, the life that is, and the life that is yet to be. Thus we catch a far-off glimpse of that great Universal Soul towards which indeed " the whole creation moves." Ultimately there is only One that lives. We all are sparks from that Divine fire, not thrown off at some distant and half-forgotten date, but sustained by It now, and through It, linked Avith every being that exists, or has existed, or shall exist in scecula sceculorum. Remember that, but for the elimination of " dead matter " we are still moving within the sphere of influence of orthodox and accepted science. But already we may perceive the vast range of added power and enhanced possibilities that are opening out before us. We may feel the thrill of our new freedom, Ave may see the light of the dawn that will illumine the rising day of the new knowledge. We must now get ready to enter upon our new inheri- tance. We can " call our soul our own," and as regards our body, that is no longer our soul's prison- house, but its storehouse and library, subject in 94 THE LAWS OF NATURE every detail to our superior will, provided we have due regard to the traditions and prejudices of our vast army of subordinates. It is in our power to consider all their requirements, to satisfy all their demands, to pay the maximum price they may exact from us for obeying our behest. So much for our physical organism. And then we have our social life, the intercourse with our equals, " as a Sovereign State with a Sovereign State," in which all is at our disposal if we will but pay the price or take the penalty, but where the penalty becomes a reward if we but further the interests of that higher organism which is the community, our nation, or humanity at large. And lastly, we have the central link, which is unbreakable eternally, which connects us up with the Highest, through superior aggregations or organisations of which we are as yet but dimly aware, but which some, more privileged than the rest, see in rare glimpses in moments of ecstasy. Such a rare moment is this, perhaps, of ours, when we first see the ultimate consequences of this new vision of the universe. Who would not say that, even if it be not true, it deserves to be true ? Yet truth is never wholly attainable. We can only make occasional strides towards it, big or little. This, let us hope, is a big stride. But neither can truth be made part of ourselves except by patient and detailed effort. In what follows, therefore, we must return to the plodding and the spade-work. THE NEW OUTLOOK Q5 Science has been built up by the countless individual labours of innumerable observers. If materialism has for a time enthralled it, it is because its eyes were fixed in the eye-pieces of the microscope and the telescope, its hands were in contact with actual tangible fact. So must ours be, but our outlook must be wider, our instruments more accurate, our reagents more delicate, our tests more searching and sensitive. We must account for all the accumu- lated facts of science as well as is done by any existing theory. In addition, we must account for a large number of new facts not embraced by any existing theory, simply because existing theories are diametrically opposed to their possibility. If we can do that, no power on earth or heaven can stand against us, and science will, in a few years, be re- modelled in accordance with these new and wider conceptions. CHAPTER VI BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRIT " If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body. So also it is written, The first Adam became a living soul. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit." — Saint Paul. Our next great task is not one of analysis, but of synthesis. We have reduced the whole world and all existence to an infinite gradation of intelligences, all possessing a degree of freedom, but all eternally linked with the Universal Oversoul. From these simple data we must now reconstruct in detail the world we live in, with its animal, vegetable, and mineral kingdoms, its stars and molecules, its light and sound and heat, its birth and death, its joy and sorrow, its goodness and truth and beauty, its evil and falsity and ugliness, its love and hate, its selfish- ness and self-sacrifice, its age-long evolution and final destiny. It is a gigantic task, a task attempted hitherto only by one system, that which its authors style a " scientific monism," but which is known popularly with sufficient accuracy as materialism. Other systems of philosophy have indeed claimed a like universal scope, but they have always postu- lated a dualism which the modern mind feels more 9 6 BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRIT 97 and more to be intolerable. The divorce between mind and matter cuts at the very root of their vitality. It is the old feud between Ormuzd and Ahriman, between light and darkness, between an all-powerful Good and an all but all-powerful Evil. It is not surprising that such unsatisfactory systems have to give way before any kind of con- sistent monism. The dualistic systems can only exist by the hope of a final cataclysm, in which the greatest and best of the powers shall finally prevail. But such a cataclysm is philosophically impossible. If it ever takes place, it must take place at a definite time. If it is decisive, that epoch will divide all time into two eternities, one before the cataclysm and the other after it. Thus the cataclysm will be an abrupt and absolute break in the continuity of eternity, and we have to account for the peculiar accident which placed us at the hither side of the break instead of the farther side. Moreover, if the cataclysm takes place in a measurable time, let that time be x years. These x years will be such years to us only, in our present state. In another conceivable state, they might be equivalent to as many seconds, or, again, to as many geological eras. Time is only relative to the events taking place. It has no absolute existence. And in whatever way we imagine the cataclysm to take place, it will become meaningless if we make our scale of space or time large enough or small enough. G 98 BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRIT No, the cataclysm must go, and all forms of dualism must go with it. This has been felt more and more clearly. Hence the steady advance of monism. The materialist says : " There is but one God, and that is matter, eternal and indestructible." We also preach but one God, but it is a living God. Instead of universal death and deadness, we postulate universal life. Instead of regarding life as an accident, an efflorescence, we regard it as the only reality. Instead of explaining the life which we know by the matter of which we know nothing, we proceed from the known to the unknown, with pre- cisely that regard for the economy of thought which is the pride and mainstay of orthodox science. Let us see. We have evolved the laws of nature from the social pressure of the infra-world. The life-struggles of that vast mass of atomic existences present us with certain regularities and uniformities which we find universally followed. As the regis- trar-general boils down his births, marriages, and deaths into dry figures — birth-rates, death-rates, marriage-rates " per 1000 of population " — and finds them obeying a certain rule, often remaining constant for years to within a small decimal frac- tion, so we find the seething life of countless deni- zens of the lower worlds summarised in a few broad rules, which are essentially statistical laws. These rules we profit by to build up our bodies and souls and spirits. And what are these ? ^ AN INDIVIDUAL 99 To illustrate our conception of the relations between body and soul we shall use a diagram constructed on certain simple principles. It gives an intelligible scheme illustrating the gradation of beings which make up an " individual," right down to the infinitely little. Let O represent the universal centre of being, and let the rays proceeding from it represent separate intelligences. Let a line or plane MN represent a Fig. l. " world " in which these intelligences appear and act under similar conditions. The intersections of MN and the rays will be points, i.e. they will be " separate individuals," without any apparent direct connection with each other. They will, however, not be really isolated, as they all connect through 0. This corresponds to our general scheme of existence, a number of apparently separate indi- viduals united by an unseen mechanism with the 100 BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRIT centre of all existence. It is a scheme which has many parallels in everyday life. A State, an army, a stock exchange, a telephone exchange, in fact, any human organisation, and, for that matter, any organisation whatever, is built on the same general plan. We must further postulate that is eternal, and that every ray is eternal. For if any ray could be annihilated, itself could be annihilated. The line MN is arbitrary. It can be shifted without affecting the eternity of the rays. In other words, the " worlds " in which the intelligences can act are infinite in number. If the rays are eternal, they cannot either be born or die. We are inclined also to postulate that their number is infinite, as a limited number would mean a limited universe, and that is inconceivable. Still, the infinity of the number is not quite so obvious a necessity as their eternity. For the present we will assume that the number is infinite. So far, then, we have an infinite number of eternal intelligences capable of acting in an infinite number of different worlds. We must now get closer to the meaning of the word " acting." The most obvious development is to endow the rays with motion, which changes their relative position. But position in itself does not exert any effect unless there is already a mutual action which depends upon that position. Let us take an analogy from celestial mechanics, and postulate an attraction between any OUR DIAGRAM IOI one ray and every other, which varies inversely as the square of the distance. To make this calcul- able, we must also postulate that the rays are elastic, so that as a rule they remain straight lines. They cannot get entangled, as their ends cannot be manipulated, and they are geometrical lines (i.e. length without thickness). All these provisions are not intended to fix the " mechanical properties of intelligence," but simply to determine the working of our diagram. The diagram can prove nothing. It can make valuable suggestions, and the value of these will be the greater the more closely our symbolic diagram corresponds with the reality. Having got all the suggestions we like out of it, we can, if we please, discard our diagram in favour of another with different assumed properties. We have, however, to endow our rays with at least one other non-geometrical property before we can utilise our diagram for an analysis of the uni- verse as we know it. We have postulated that each individual ray is eternal. That means that it can- not lose its identity. It cannot perfectly coincide with any other ray. It can, however, approach it as closely as we like. It can be in " contact " with it for a certain part of its length, but its lower ends must always remain separate. The junction of two rays gives us a new kind of point, a new kind of individuality, an individual 102 BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRIT intermediate between the centre and the ultimate '' monad." In the world MN the appearance is much the same, but in the world PQ a new kind of individual has appeared at A. Five boating experts, we will say, come together and form themselves into a Fig. 2. boat's crew. That crew is an " individual " as regards the training and the race. It is repre- sented by A in the boat-racing world. When it is disbanded, the scheme of Fig. 1 reappears. The importance of junctions or knots like A cannot be exaggerated. It symbolises individuality, the secret of sentient, organised being. It is the GENESIS OF INDIVIDUALS 103 Gorclian knot which we have set ourselves here to disentangle. The laws of knot-formation are the laws of the organised universe. Let us next endeavour to construct a complete individual of our own order by the same symbolism. The human body consists of organs, which are to a certain extent self-contained and independent. The organs consist of cells, which also have such a cer- tain amount of home rule. The cells again are supposed to consist of biogens or protoplasts, which lead to some extent an independent life within the cell-organisation. The biogens consist of colloid aggregates, these again of complex molecules, and these again of atoms. We know nothing of the relative degrees of independence of all these, but we may assume with some show of reason that the atoms, at all events, are largely self-contained and independent. Thus we have in Fig. 3, a human being at A, one of his organs at B, one of the cells of that organ (say, a liver-cell) at C, one of the biogens of that cell at D, and at E, inseparable from its companions by the most powerful micro- scope, we have a single atom. Below that again we have further subdivisions, which, however, are in- visible to us, and this continuous further subdivision may be symbolised by a thickening of the lines down to the infinitely small. The latter is embodied in the diagram by continually halving the successive intervals between one grade and the next. This 104 BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRIT device gives an infinite succession of gradations, which stops at the base-line. To represent reality more closely, the cells C should not be only nine in number, but more like World of Cells World ofBiogens World of Atoms Infra World : >>— Infinitesimal. Fig. a million million (a " billion "). But this would introduce needless confusion. The principle is all we want to show. This, then, is the human body, surely a more rational representation, more in accordance with A HUMAN UNIT 105 both philosophy and physiology, than any other hitherto devised ! It gives us a complete definition of the human body. But next we want to find the soul. That there is some difference in the value of the various constituents of the body is indisputable. Some organs are "vital," others can be dispensed with. In each organ, again, some cells are more important than others. Within the cell itself, as we have already seen (p. 65), it is the nucleus which governs the processes of assimilation, growth, and repair. Within the nucleus, again, we have the chromatin, of somewhat undecided predominance. And there is no reason why the process should stop there. Whatever may be the " world " we are considering, we shall always find that some parts of it are essential to the organism, others unessential, others again purely accidental and easily separable, or even oppressive and noxious. In the human subject, the nerve cells are credited with the most effective control of the organism. Every muscular fibre has embedded in it the flattened root-plate of a nerve, which connects it directly with the brain, furnishing a wire-like connection which strikingly recalls one of a bundle of telephone wires, or one of a bundle of " rays " in our own diagram above. This gradation, according to essential value or importance, must also be read into our diagram 106 BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRIT if it is to represent symbolically the main facts of life. In order to do this, we will establish the convention that the central branches of every unit are to be the most essential or " vital," and the lateral branches the less vital. Thus, hi the world of organs passing through the point B the central knot may represent the nervous system, and in the world of cells some brain cells or important " sympathetic " ganglia may be predominant enough to be assigned the central place. Modern physiology does, however, not favour the idea of centralising life hi any particular system or set of organs, more especially as all the cells are closely connected by cell-bridges (see p. 57). We must therefore recognise that there is a continuous gradation of importance, and that on some occasions the less im- portant organs and cells may assume an increased importance. This is instanced by cases in which an operation on some non-vital part is followed by death from " shock." If we wanted to extract all the essential parts of the body, leaving behind those which are non-essential, it would be more advisable to extract the nucleus from every cell. Suppose for the moment that this could be done ; what would be the effect on the remainder of the body ? Obviously its behaviour would be similar to that of a single cell which has been deprived of its nucleus. On this subject Wilson says l : " A frag- 1 " The Cell," p. 30. EXTRACTION OF NUCLEI 107 ment of a cell deprived of its nucleus may live for a considerable time and manifest the power of co-ordinated movement without perceptible impair- ment. . . . Those functions that involve destructive metabolism may continue for a time in the absence of a nucleus ; those that involve constructive meta- bolism cease with its removal." The body will not assimilate, it will not grow, it will have no power of repairing itself. It will gradually die. Mean- while the nuclei will retain all their capacities, and, if provided with suitable surroundings, with food-supplies at the proper temperature, will resume their functions as if nothing had happened, leaving the abandoned body to its fate. Let us consider for a few moments longer the nuclear organism which we have extracted. Let us endeavour to obtain as clear a view of it as possible. If it retains the outline of the body, it will have just about the density of air. Its particles are, however, over a million times heavier than air molecules. They will, in fact, form a kind of mist, and a calculation by Stokes' law shows that if left to itself in air, such a collection of nuclei would settle down at the rate of about one inch in eight hours. The extraction of nuclei has often been accom- plished in the physiological laboratory by artificial peptic digestion. But the very fact that this is possible should warn us against identifying the 108 BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRIT nucleus with what used to be called the " vital principle" of the body. It is already fairly clear that not all parts of the nucleus are equally vital. There is the chromatin, which greedily takes up colouring matter. There is the almost invisible linin, which forms the network and the spindle- fibres. There is the paralinin or ground substance. There is, further, the pyrenin, of which the nucleoli consist. And, lastly, there is the amphipyrcnin, the substance of the nuclear membrane. Which of all these is the most essential it is impossible as yet to say. Wilson (p. 334) warns his reader "that in the whole field of microchemistry we are still on such uncertain ground that all general con- clusions must be taken with reserve." It is not even decided whether the staining reactions (upon which we depend for discriminating between the various constituents of the nucleus) are of a physical or chemical nature. Our search for the " spiritual body " may be a prolonged one, but there is no reason why it should be indefinitely prolonged. At some future time we may succeed in tracing a visible difference between a cell in full functional activity and a cell which has just " died." Perhaps that could be done even now. But since we are not en rapport with the life of a cell, we cannot fix upon the moment of death. Whatever the " vital principle " may be, it is probably associated with definite THE SPIRITUAL BODY 109 material parts of the system. Indeed, we may say it consists of those parts. This is not materialism, since we have postulated that all matter is alive. These vital material parts are those entities which control the organism on behalf of our individuality. They are the officials which are empowered to act in the name of the Sovereign. Now we have had reasons for believing that there is an infinite gradation both in the order of the subservient entities and in their relative importance. If, therefore, we call the aggregate of the more vital entities of our body our " spiritual body," we must guard against any hard and fast line of demarcation. There is no limiting line where we can say : This is spiritual, that is not spiritual. It is only a question of more or less. It matters little what we call the vital aggregate. We may call it the spiritual body, or the " astral " body (an unfortunate word) or simply the " soul." That the word " soul " has come to mean something altogether immaterial is only an accident. To follow that practice would be to rehabilitate the dogma of the existence of dead matter which it was our first business to demolish. We shall therefore simply call this vital aggregate " the soul," and next inquire whether, and under what circumstances, it is capable of existence apart from the body. If we assumed, as before, that the soul consisted HO BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRTT simply of the cell nuclei, we should have to acknowledge that it is apparently impossible for the nuclei to exist separately. In any case, they are not observed to leave the cell at its death, but to " die " with it. What we have to find out is whether the soul can leave the body during its lifetime, or only at the death of the body, if at all. A few years ago it would not have been per- missible to think that any assemblage of material particles could simultaneously leave every cell of the body. But in the last few years our ideas of the possibilities of " matter " have been con- siderably enlarged. The atom has, with great probability, been shown to be a system of very much smaller bodies called " electrons," so that if an atom were enlarged to a sphere fitting within the orbit of Neptune, it would not be much more close-grained than is our solar system. This leaves ample room for all kinds of interpenetration, and we have to attribute the observed stability of our body, its constancy of volume and outline, to the play of imponderable forces acting at a distance across spaces vast in comparison with the size of the particles upon which they act. On this view, then, the body is itself a kind of mist, and there is nothing against the possibility of extracting from it a finer mist, and doing so in a short time, and repeatedly, with a nearly permanent possibility of MECHANISM OF SEPABATION I I I restoring it to its former place. For— and this is significant — the force of cohesion, which keeps our body together, is almost certainly of electrostatic origin. The full possibilities of electrostatic force are never realised in ordinary physical phenomena. It is quite conceivable that a more pronounced separation of positive and negative electricity in the " vital extract " or " soul " should amply com- pensate the tenuity of its constitution, and give it a consistency sufficient for all ordinary purposes. Nothing can, therefore, be said a priori against the possibility, at all events, of a separation of the soul from the body, and of its temporary existence as a separate entity. Now such a separation is not a mere possibility. It is a 'practiced reality. It is known to modern psychical research as to " externalisation of person- ality " (I 'exteriorization de la personnalite). Details of this will be given in future chapters, but it may be stated here that a large number of credible obser- vations are on record in which parts of the human form, more especially hands and arms, have been dup- licated and have emerged from the body in a more or less shadowy state, not so shadowy, however, but that they could exert considerable force and produce results capable of being measured and automatically recorded. In other cases, entire human forms have been thus projected, and have been material enough to produce the appearance of normal human 112 BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRIT personalities. These have, as a rule, been clothed in appropriate drapery, and it is this drapery, rather than the forms themselves, which have provoked intense incredulity. This attitude is, however, very illogical. If tangible hands, limbs, and faces can be thus produced, it means that a great deal of unessential matter (almost what we might call " ballast ") is added to the soul-form. And if that is done, why draw the line at a little additional " ballast " which enables the forms to appear in a mixed company without immediately raising insuperable objections to their presence ? However inconceivable it may be to us that elaborately organised forms should be built up in a few minutes, there is not a trace of a priori improbability about it. Such a feat is a common- place of nature, which builds up the most intricate organisms by the million at a time, and consider- ably exceeds the record of the printer in producing additional copies of a design once provided. If we wanted to represent the soul diagram- matically, it would suffice to draw straight lines down from the level of C (Fig. 3 above), without any thickening towards the infinitesimal below. This would mean that none but the most essential parts form part of the soul. Could we arrive at some quantitative estimate of the proportion of vital (or detachable) portions to the whole, we might arrive at a really scientific definition of the soul. IS THE SOUL SEPARABLE ? I I 3 We know that if it were one-tenth per cent., for instance, the soul would have the specific gravity of air. It would float in the air. If the pro- portion were less, and the volume were the same, the soul would rise in the air like a balloon, and find its natural home somewhere in the higher atmosphere. This would give a physical justification for the old-fashioned " heavenward " gaze upwards ! As regards the " spirit," that term is too vague to be capable of even a provisional definition. In any case, to judge from analogy, there is no hard and fast line of demarcation between soul and spirit. Perhaps we might take the three straight lines radiating from A as re- presenting the spirit, ignoring all branches which split off below. Or perhaps the main line upwards from A might serve as a more suitable symbol. If the soul can be proved to be separable from the body even during the lifetime of a person, half the battle for immortality is fought and won. The great and overwhelming argument for the annihi- lation of the human individual at death is that no characteristic message from his mind to ours any longer reaches us. If we can prove that this is simply due to a kind of " moult," whereby an out- worn or damaged covering is laid aside in favour of either vastly increased freedom or a more suit- able covering, death will have lost most of its terrors. If physical death is a daily process, which H 114 BODY, SOUL, AND SPIRIT only attains a certain climax or permanence at the time of this " moult," it -will no longer be looked upon as an impassable gulf. And, to go a little farther, if we can prove that the confinement of the soul in a heavily ballasted body conduces to its stability and safety, and facilitates the acquisition of certain kinds of knowledge, we shall understand that life and death are not matters of tragedy, but entirely matters of convenience, utility, and comfort. The ultimate fate of the human monad may still remain a matter of speculation and some uncer- tainty, but it will become apparent that this uncer- tainty has nothing to do with physical death, and will, in all probability, not be removed or in any way affected by it. For practical life it will be useful to know more about the possibilities of temporary separation of soul and body, possibilities which largely partake of the nature of physical and physiological problems. The study of these possibilities will annex to science most of the realms hitherto regarded as " occult," and will enable us to deal with ghosts, apparitions, hauntings, and doubles much as we do now with meteorites or comets or icebergs, while it will throw the searchlight of accurate investigation over the path which we all one day must tread on our way into the unseen world. PART IT CHAPTER I BIRTH .Birth and death are the boundary stones of earth-life. Immortality presents itself in two different aspects in connection with these two events. In considering birth, we are faced by the problem of pre-existence, just as after death comes the problem of continued life. In the process of birth we have to account for the appearance in the world of a new individual. The progress from birth to death is irreversible. Yet there is no logical necessity for its being so. Consider the alternatives; and suppose that a portion or the whole of a human life process were reversible. If that portion were one-half of it, we should have a normal development from birth up to the age of thirty or forty, and then a gradual reversal, a diminution of bulk and strength, a gener- alisation instead of a specialisation of functions, more cell-fusion than cell-division, more elimination than acquisition, and a final dwindling of the organism to an invisibly small germ-cell, which in turn I I 6 BIRTH might fuse with other cells and finally become untraceable. A reversal of the whole life-process is more difficult to conceive. A fully formed but great lv ossified human body would have to become suddenly animated by a human intelligence, would have to gain in strength, suppleness, and soundness, to arrive at full vigour, and then dwindle to youth and infancy as already indicated. Such pure reversals are unknown. But that there is a reversal in the tendency towards ex- pansion admits of little doubt. The " second childhood " of old age looks like a reversal of some process associated with birth. It is as if, instead of expanding its realm and accreting new material, the soul retired from the world and gradually reduced its sphere of action and in- fluence. The loss of stature and weight which usually accompanies old age is an eloquent indi- cation of the general tendency towards retrench- ment, a tendenc}^ which, but for the stability of the more permanent tissues, would no doubt go much farther than it does. In the course of his " threescore years and ten " man builds him a house, many materials of which are permanent, and designed to be so in order to enable him to take a certain set of conditions as a firm and changeless base of operations. When the possibilities of development under those conditions CELL-DIVISION I I 7 are exhausted, when the novelty has worn off, the organism is not demolished as carefully as it was built up. It is laid aside, like a garment outworn. The demolishing work is left to "nature's scavengers," the bacteria of putrefaction. Although there is this rwpetissement, this re- trenchment towards both the boundaries of life, there are in other ways most significant differences. Death is not associated with the living in the way that birth is. Death is a solitary act, while birth is most intimately bound up with the maternal organism. The generalisation Omne vivum e vivo holds good, as far as we know, for the entire organic world. No individual is born into this world without the vital co-operation of at least one living individual, and in most cases two. In its simplest form, the problem of birth appears to us in the process of unicellular cell-division, and here again the simplest conditions are found in the flagellates, such as Tetramitus, a little animal consisting of a single cell provided with four hair- like tentacles which enable it to propel itself through water. It resembles a bag of jelly, with a darker central sphere, apparently without structure, and granules of chromatin scattered irregularly about it. When division approaches, the sphere becomes lengthened out, a constriction appears about the middle, which becomes more pronounced and finally leads to cleavage. At the same time, the granules I I 8 BIRTH collect about the sphere and divide themselves into two groups, each group attaching itself to one of the cloven spheres. These move apart in the substance of the cell, and the whole bag of jelly repeats the cleavage. The hair-like flagellse do the same, so that they become eight in number, and when finally " the painter is cut " we have two individuals where before we had only one. This is " birth " in its simplest form. But if we can account fully for this, the chief difficulties of the problem are solved. It would only remain to deal with the problem of conjugation, or the union of two different individuals which as a rule precedes the production of new ones. Of this, Wilson says 1 : " The conjugation of unicellular organisms possesses a peculiar interest, since it is undoubtedly a proto- type of the union of germ- cells in the multicellular forms. Biitschli and Minot long ago maintained that cell-divisions tend to run in cycles, each of which begins and ends with an act of conjuga- tion. In the higher forms, the cells produced in each cycle cohere to form the multicellular body ; in the unicellular forms the cells separate as distinct individuals, but those belonging to one cycle are collectively comparable with the multicellular body. The validity of this comparison, in a morphological sense, is generally admitted. No process of conju- gation, it is true, is known to occur in many uni- 1 " The Cell," p. 222. CONJUGATION I I 9 cellular and in some multicellular forms, and the cyclical character of cell-division still remains sub judice. It is none the less certain that a key to the fertilisation of higher forms must be sought in the conjugation of unicellular organisms. The difficul- ties of observation are, however, so great that we are as yet acquainted with only the outlines of the process, and have still no very clear idea of its finer details or its physiological meaning. The pheno- mena have been most clearly followed in the infu- soria by Biitschli, Engelmann, Maupas, and Richard Hertwig, though many valuable observations on the conjugation of unicellular plants have been made by De Bary, Schmitz, Klebahn, and Overton. All these observers have reached the same general result as that attained through study of the fertilisa- tion of the egg ; namely, that an essential pheno- menon of conjugation is a union of the nuclei of the conjugating cells. Among the unicellular plants both the cell-bodies and the nuclei completely fuse. Among animals this may occur ; but in many of the infusoria union of the cell-bodies is only temporary, and the conjugation consists of a mutual exchange and fusion of nuclei. . . . We may first consider the conjugation of infusoria. Maupas's beautiful observations have shown that in this group the life-history of the species runs in cycles, a long period of multiplication by cell- division being succeeded by an ' epidemic of con- 120 BIRTH j ligation,' which inaugurates a new cycle, and is obviously comparable in its physiological aspect with the period of sexual maturity in the metazoa. If conjugation does not occur, the race rapidly degenerates and dies out ; and Maupas believes himself justified in the conclusion that conjugation counteracts the tendency to senile degeneration and causes rejuvenescence, as maintained by Butschli and Minot." Wilson then goes on to describe the essential phenomena occurring during conjugation. They are extremely significant : — " The infusoria possess two kinds of nuclei, a large macronucleus and one or more small micro- nuclei. During conjugation the macronucleus de- generates and disappears, and the micronucleus alone is concerned in the essential part of the process. The latter divides several times, one of the products, the germ-nucleus, conjugating with a corresponding germ-nucleus from the other indi- vidual, while the others degenerate as ' corpuscules de rebut.' The dual nucleus thus formed, which corresponds to the cleavage-nucleus of, the ovum, then gives rise by division to both macronuclei and micronuclei of the offspring of the conjugating animals." Here, then, we have an epitome of the processes by one or other of which all living beings increase and multiply and people the earth. NECESSITY FOR MULTIPLICATION I 2 I Herbert Spencer propounded an ingenious theory to account for the primal necessity of subdivision. Food, he said, must be absorbed through the surface of the cell. When the diameter of a cell is doubled, its surface becomes four times as great as before, but its volume becomes eight times as great. The food- traffic will therefore be twice as heavy as before, and may unduly strain the consistency of the surface. If the eight-fold volume were subdivided into eight separate cells, the surface per volume would be the same as before, and the customary process of food-supply could be maintained. This argument supposes, of course, that enlarge- ment of volume is in itself an object towards which the natural processes tend. In view of the govern- ing activity of the nuclear matter it is more reason- able to suppose that the multiplication of nuclei is the governing tendency. Each nucleus is a centre of life, the seat of some intelligent activity which we, being so far removed from it in the scale of intelligence, can only dimly appreciate. This intelligence, we may well believe, is fitted for dealing with certain kinds of influences and impulses, provided by the medium in which it lives. It can deal with them at a certain rate. If the impulses become too rapid, life becomes too " strenuous," and the working capacity of the " central exchange " is overstrained. An undue 122 BIRTH increase in volume not only increases the points of contact with the outer world beyond a certain limit. It also, and much more largely, increases the amount of second-class matter to be superin- tended. If, then, the food-supply becomes too abundant, and growth too rapid, the nucleus divides, and the line of cleavage, after beginning among the innermost arcana of vitality, runs through the outer courts of life, emerging into the visible day and taking the remaining matter in the lump, much as two heirs, after having carefully sorted and divided the jewelry and family heirlooms, might lump the remaining property together and take their halves at random. Life and experience are thereby multiplied and varied. But a danger then arises, and has to be guarded against. It is that in the extreme varia- tion of life thus produced there may be a deviation from the best tradition, that inherited tradition of customary processes which is the outcome of long ages of ancestral experience. This danger is mini- mised by the converse process of conjugation. In this process, certain vital parts of each cell combine together and give rise to new nuclei, and thus to new individuals. From the point of view advanced in this book, it is evident that we have to deal with what, in short, we might style the division and combination of souls. For, according to our view, all cells are DIVISIBILITY OF- CONSCIOUSNESS I 23 living beings, which may or may not combine to form beings of a higher order. And the most essential, vital, directive parts of each cell con- stitute its soul. This soul is withdrawn from the cell when it " dies," and its subsequent fate is what we have to determine, if we can. Now the question arises : Can a soul split in two ? And this is matched by the converse question : Can two souls become merged into one ? If, as we have all along assumed, all living things are linked together through some superior centre (or, in the last resort, through the universal centre), if, in fact, all life is ultimately One, then there is no difficulty in assuming any number and variety of different combinations and dispersals of the ultimate infinitesimal units of life. But we have really nothing to do with these. We have in practice to deal with very complex combinations of them, with very highly organised and differentiated systems, and must ask ourselves whether such duplication of contents of consciousness as we actually observe is deducible from our general premises, or, at least, not inconsistent with them. Reverting to our diagram of an individual (Fig. 3, p. 104), we need only suppose that the central lines of each plastid bundle are capable of splitting along their lengths, beginning at the " infinitesimal " end. The result in a simple case is represented by Fig. 4, where B and C are two similar individuals formed 124 BIRTH by simple fission. Conjugation would then be represented by the converse process. The more central lines would coalesce, and liberate the re- mainder from their allegiance. The knot at A would mean that there is a unifying principle which tends to keep the species moving along the same general lines of development. This unifying knot Fig. 4. at A also brings about the " epidemic of conjuga- tion" periodically. In a multicellular individual it represents the soul, not of the cell or the species, but of the whole organism. In the metazoa or higher organisms generally, the process is more complex. It is a process of fission, conjugation, and a second fission. Briefly, it consists in this. GEEM-CELLS I 2 5 Specially equipped cells (called germ-cells) are developed by each organism, whose function it is to hand on the inherited tradition. These germ-cells are of two kinds, male and female, and while in most plants and in some of the lower animals both kinds are developed in the same individual, in the higher animals each kind is only developed by its appropriate sex. Millions of these are constantly produced, and only an insignificant proportion of them ever fulfil their appropriate function. To do this, it is necessary that a male germ-cell should reach a female germ-cell, that their nuclei should fuse, and give rise to a new nucleus capable of cleavage. When this happens, a new individual of the same species is gradually developed by the sub- division and multiplication of the original cell and the differentiation of the different groups of cells into organs. The process thus briefly sketched raises quite a number of important questions. Have the germ- cells, male or female, any souls ? And if so, of what order ? What relation have these souls to that of the individual ? What becomes of the souls of the germ-cells when they die without fulfilling their function ? What happens when they do fulfil their appropriate function ? The simplest way of dealing with these ques- tions will be to answer them, so to speak, dogmatically, and then to proceed at leisure 126 BIRTH to justify the answers given. These, then, are the answers : — All germ-cells, like other cells, have souls. Their souls differ materially, but not fundamentally, from other cells of the body, in two main particulars. They are composed of infinitesimal monads derived from the whole of the body, instead of being chiefly associated with a single organ (they are, so to speak, condensed extracts of the whole individual). And, secondly, they are one-sided, asymmetrical, or incomplete. They are incomplete structurally, as shown by their possessing only half the usual num- ber of chromosomes (see p. 72). They are, there- fore, incapable of spontaneous division or of separate growth. When the germ-cells die, with their mission un- fulfilled, their souls return to the organism whence they came. When two germ-cells meet and merge, their souls are liberated from their parent organisms. The " lines " which constitute them intertwine, swing loose from the two parent groups, and form a new knot on a level with the souls of the parent individuals. At that moment, in a flash of rapture, a new soul is conceived and enters the world in Avhich its two parents move. This view brings out the essential similarity of the process of reproduction in all forms of life. In both protozoa and metazoa there is an alternation DEVELOPMENT 127 of division and conjugation. The only difference is that whereas in the protozoa fission or cell-division implies an actual separation of the cells, in the metazoa the divided cells continue in contact, and support each other by a division of labour and by mutual service. This mutual service is the governing principle of the life of the metazoon from its earliest stages. What exactly is the guiding principle of the de- velopment of the embryonic being into its state of maturity is the most profound problem of biology. After reviewing the various theories hitherto pro- pounded, Wilson says x : — " The truth is that an explanation of development is at present beyond our reach. The controversy be- tween pre-formation and epigenesis has now arrived at a stage where it has little meaning apart from the general problem of physical causality. What we know is that a specific kind of living substance, de- rived from the parent, tends to run through a specific cycle of changes during which it transforms itself into a body like that of which it formed a part ; and we are able to study with greater or less precision the mechanism by which that transformation is effected and the conditions under which it takes place. But despite all our theories we no more know how the organisation of the germ-cell involves the properties of the adult body than we know how the properties 1 " The Cell," p. 433. 128 BIRTH of hydrogen and oxygen involve those of water. So long as the chemist and physicist are unable to solve so simple a problem of physical causality as this, the embryologist may well be content to re- serve his judgment on a problem a hundred-fold more complex." Our view of the problem is that it is not a ques- tion of " physical causality " at all, and that no physical theory can, in the nature of things, ever shed any light on the real problem of development. The course of development is so evidently governed by psychological rather than physical factors that only the prevailing materialism of biology can account for this not being acknowledged long ago. We have all along been driven to suppose that some part of the memory of the individual is embodied in every cell of the body, and we may well assume that such a crisis as the merging of two germ-cells stimulates and exalts the memories of both, and throws into strong relief all that they have in common. This common ground will be a closer approach to the average memory of the species than each memory would be when taken separately. For lack of an insight into the true cause of de- velopment, biologists have invented a word which, at all events, embodies the unknown factor deter- mining the idiosyncrasies of each species. The word is " idioplasm," and it means " the substance, now generally identified with chromatin, which by HEREDITY 1 29 its inherent organisation involves the characteristics of the species." l In short, it is the cause which, by some inherent cause, causes — the effect observed. Wilson says : 2 — " The second question, regarding the historical origin of the idioplasm, brings us to the side of the evolutionists. The idioplasm of every species has been derived, as we must believe, by the modifica- tion of a pre-existing idioplasm through variation, and the survival of the fittest. Whether these variations first arise in the idioplasm of the germ- cells, as Weismann maintains, or whether they may arise in the body-cells and then be reflected back upon the idioplasm, is a question to which the study of the cell has thus far given no certain answer. Whatever position we take on this question, the same difficulty is encountered ; namely, the origin of that co-ordinated fitness, that power of active adjust- ment between internal and external relations, which, as so many eminent biological thinkers have in- sisted, overshadows every manifestation of life. The nature and origin of this powjr is the fundamental problem of biology. When, after removing the lens of the eye in the larval salamander, we see it restored in perfect and typical form by regeneration from the posterior layer of the iris, we behold an adap- tive response to changed conditions of which the organism can have had no antecedent experience 1 Wilson's Glossary in " The Cell." 2 Ibid., p. 433. I 130 BIRTH either ontogenetic or phylogenetic, and one of so marvellous a character that we are made to realise, as by a flash of light, how far we still are from a solution of this problem." Without attempting or pretending to give a com- plete solution of this difficult problem, we may point out that there is nothing inconceivable in a pro- found stirring of ancestral infra-world memories at the union of two germ-cells. As at the moment of death, so at the moment of conception, there is an exaltation of memory which surveys, with lightning- rapidity, a vast course of previous evolution. That memory becomes a directive influence, pointing out the future path, which must be parallel with the path already trodden. And so the incipient being rehearses during its early existence the stages through which the species passed in the course of its age-long evolution, and that remarkable corre- spondence between ontogenetic and phylogenetic development arises, that agreement between the life-history of the individual and that of the species, which Haeckel has done so much to make known, and from which he has drawn so many unwarranted conclusions. CHAPTER II LIFE AFTER DEATH Aee we prepared for a rational theory of the life after death ? The question seems a strange one. Is not this rational theory what the world has been striving for ages to attain to ? Does not this question of the after-life confront us whenever we think a few years or scores of years beyond our present life ? Is not the truth the best, the greatest, the most welcome ? What is the actual present-day attitude on the question ? Let us examine it dispassionately, with sole regard for accuracy and impartiality. In Europe and America we have two main attitudes, the (more or less orthodox) Christian attitude and the Materialistic attitude. The former controls most of those who are emotional rather than intellectual ; the latter controls the quasi- intellectual classes and a considerable proportion of the highly cultured. The Christian attitude towards immortal^ is difficult to state succinctty. It depends partly upon the form of Christianity professed, and partly x 3i 132 LIFE AFTER DEATH upon personal disposition and the " private judg- ment." Broadly speaking, there is an assurance of personal survival, largely centred about the personality of the Founder of Christianity and based upon His re- surrection after crucifixion. There is a general belief hi a moral retribution, which in many cases takes the form of places of bliss and of punishment, as well as an intermediate place of purification. A final resurrection of all flesh and Judgment Day are also looked forward to, and in the more extreme forms we have the doctrines of eternal bliss and eternal punishment. Details of the life immediately following death are of the vaguest. In fact, the prevailing tendency is to avoid them carefully, to screen them from the play of reason, to veil them from the prying in- tellect, so as to avoid a conflict between the heart and the understanding, between faith and reason. The next world is peopled with angels and devils, among whom the departed soul finds it hard to hold its own, and cannot hope to do so unfortified by a fervent belief in the truths revealed by religion and the record of a good life on earth. To all this the materialistic attitude offers a blank negation. It professes to point out all the impossi- bilities and absurdities of the Christian attitude, and shows that the possibility of a future life without the brain is contradicted by every fact of nature. PRESENT CONTROVERSIES I 33 It asserts the supreme right of the intellect to decide these questions, and attributes the contrary teachings of the religious bodies to a species of in- tellectual quackery, to the misuse of intellectual powers for the misguidance of the unintelligent masses. To this sweeping condemnation the Churches reply by denouncing the materialistic doctrines as immoral and anti-moral, as dangerous to the welfare of the community. This again is met by the plea of " material prosperity," of im- provements in sanitation and public health and the survival of infants — pleas which are met by pointing out a corresponding increase in criminal statistics. And so this controversy, which originated in a dispute concerning the future life, draws its trail across the whole field of social and civil activity. But the outcome of it all has been to drive the question of survival more and more into the back- waters of " practical politics." In the tussle between the emotions and the intellect the latter has proved the stronger, and to-day the world is governed precisely as it would be if no future life existed, except that care is taken to respect the feelings of people who have strong convictions to the contrary, just as some people have strong convictions con- cerning vaccination. It is not the fact of a future life that is thus acknowledged, but solely the opinion of those who believe in it. That being the actual state of things, the advent 134 LIFE AFTER DEATH of a scientific demonstration of a future life may be expected to effect a very radical alteration in our public policy. But that alteration will never take place unless there is a scientific demonstration. Humanity is not, after toiling wearily up the hill into the sunlight, going to sink back into a dark and misty valley. After ousting all the hierarchies from every civilised government, after depriving them of nearly every shred of control over the affairs of this world, it is not going to take their word on any subject as final. If the future world is to be recognised in this it will have to be more properly accredited. It will have to give an account of itself, and submit to cross-examination. If it fails to do so it will not get a hearing, and matters will go on as they are. Humanity is too busy with its appointed tasks to trouble about chimeras. After all, what can you do to a man who gives up all hope of a future life ? He is quite impervious to threats of future retribution, and will put his simple denial in the balance against your simple assertion that such awaits him. Or if, instead of your simple assertion, you quote your revealed Scriptures, your authorities, your edicts, and dogmas, he will answer you with his universal experience, his scientific method, his canons of induction, and point out countless cases where the latter have prevailed over the former. History will repeat itself. Inductive science THE RELIGIOUS ATTITUDE I 3 5 found theology in possession of this world, govern- ing all things, interpreting nature in accordance with revelation, and manipulating the facts of geology, astronomy, botany, zoology, and chrono- logy to make them fit into a traditional scheme which was not even consistent with itself. From this territory theology has been ruthlessly evicted. The visible world being henceforth closed to it, it has taken refuge in the invisible world, where it feels free to make what declarations it likes. And that invisible world continues to be the " home " towards which the weary heart turns from a world that has become indeed clean and bright and sanitary, but utterly hopeless and empty, if not unjust and cruel. For the things of this world are not enough. From the corpse and the chamber of death we turn with loathing, unless reverence or affection or the expectation of future reunion enable us to overcome the natural feeling of repugnance. We refuse to recognise our likeness in that which lies there motionless before us. We repudiate it and disown it. We feel instinctively that that cannot be the end, though a thousand sciences may thunder it into our ear. For those whom the sweet solace of religion can reach in that hour of doubt and bereave- ment it is well. Let us tenderly respect their self- abandonment and rejoice in their child-like trust in an Almighty Father who governs everything for the 136 LIFE AFTER DEATH best and will wipe away the tears from their eyes. It is not for such that this book is written. It is written for those who think, for that increasing majority of the human race in whom the claims of the intellect have become supreme, in whom the cravings of the heart are subordinate to that general sense of fairness and fitness which, for lack of a better word, we call Reason. They do not expect a special and individual Providence for themselves. If there is such, they want to share it with the whole human race. They want to balance their own good against that of their neighbour, and ascertain that the law they recognise, if extended over all humanity, will be fair and equitable to all. They will not allow any living man, or collection of men, to prescribe or dictate to them, out of some alleged authority, what is or is not true, knowing as they do that truth is a relative term, which varies from age to age, that truth is a function of two variables, reality and symbol, and that it changes as much with the latter as with the former. In other words, a truth which cannot be revised is no truth, just as an antiquated map is not a true map. A reality is expressed in certain symbols, chosen from the intellectual currency of the time of utterance. The strict correspondence between the reality and the symbolism is truth. The symbols may be words, written or spoken ; they may be THE EVOLUTION OF TRUTH 1 37 pictures, tracings, images, or allegories. Their strict correspondence to the reality is only approxi- mate, just as even a plaster cast ceases to represent the outline 'precisely once we come down to mole- cular dimensions. The symbols, only approximate at best, change in the course of time. What the Ancients called the OrMs Terrarum we call the globe. We have discarded their empyreans and epicycles as symbols which have lost all intelli- gible meaning, i.e. all relation to reality. The very firmament has become the most infirm and changfe- able of things, the most subtle and mobile realm of ether. There is hardly a word in our present-day language whose precise use and meaning are more than four or five centuries old. And even if two people use the same word, and give it the same synonyms, we have no criterion which would en- able us to tell whether they attached to it precisely the same meaning. No, in present-day thought there is no room for dogma, except as a useful temporary assumption. Every truth must be regarded, not as a thing to stand in cetemum, but as a challenge, an obstacle to freedom, at best a solid prop capable of withstanding a strain not to exceed a certain maximum. It is in this spirit that science will, if at all, ap- proach the problem of immortality. And whatever ground it effectively occupies will therewith be irre- 138 LIFE AFTER DEATH vocably and finally withdrawn from the control of dogmatism. The masterful hand of the conqueror will imme- diately make itself felt. There will be no room for parleys and reticences and obscurities, any more than in physiology or surgery. Everything must be faced, and the examination must be as thorough as a serious medical examination. The task may be far from agreeable. It may have its own dangers and disillusionments and pitfalls. But it must be faced some time, and can only be faced in the spirit of candid, fearless, painstaking inquiry, to which everything is equally clean and holy and worthy of respect, every detail of equal interest, and only one thing unclean and abominable — falsehood. In the pursuit of that inquiry it may happen — and most likely will happen — that the problem appears the more complex the further we pursue it. Before the days of the microscope, the hair on the leaf and the grain of pollen on the stamen were about the smallest things we knew, and the simplest. To-day, both of these are great and complicated structures, capable of analysis into a thousand smaller elements, and still we are far from having attained to simple elements from which everything may be theoretically or practically reconstructed. Moreover, in those early days things appeared simpler than they do now. Meat was either clean or unclean, men were righteous or unrighteous, UNEXPECTED COMPLEXITIES I 39 gentle or simple, born to everlasting bliss or eternal damnation ; there were but seven planets and a few thousand stars fixed in a crystal vault. Science has found the reality to be quite different. Animal species are more difficult to classify noAv than in the days of Deuteronomy. Man's righteousness is judged largely by his bail and his counsel ; his gen- tility is a matter of money or education ; his future fate has ceased to interest any but himself, and even himself it preoccupies little. The list of planets has expanded to many hundreds, and the approxi- mate number of fixed stars to a hundred million, contained within a vast space beyond which other and vaster spaces stretch into infinity, harbouring infinite possibilities of further existence. When the scouts of science advance into the unseen world of our future life, they will in all probability meet with a similar expansion of detail and enrichment of experience. Actual facts of that world will refuse to fit themselves into our home- made schemes of things. Our schemes will have to be revised and made more elastic. What appears to us utter simplicity may turn out to be a bewil- dering complexity, just as a drop of stagnant water is seen to be the battle-ground of innumerable forms of life. We must not expect simplicity, neither must we expect finality. Even if Ave could survey the fate of a man we knew in this life for twenty years after 140 LIFE AFTER DEATH his death, we might be no nearer to the solution of the problem of immortality properly so called, i.e. final or absolute immortality. The man himself might be in the same kind of doubt as to his ulti- mate fate as he was on this earth. It is quite conceivable that the date of annihilation might be simply adjourned, that the future life we are looking for is but a reprieve. And yet we cannot but think that the safe crossing of one Kiver of Death may raise our courage for all subsequent crossings, if such be in store for us. If we admit the possibility of eventual annihila- tion, we must face another possibility also : it is what we might call the Greek idea of Hades, peopled by bloodless shades, capable of nothing but an aimless re-enactment of the chief scenes of their earth-life. It is the " poor ghost " idea, the larva, the shell, the helpless, haunting phantom, which restlessly seeks rest, and welcomes annihilation at the last. All these various possibilities confront us, and how shall we choose between them ? What Castor and Pollux shall be our guiding-stars, what magnetic needle shall point to a changeless pole ? The answer is this : We shall follow up each clue, each alternative possibility, and follow farthest along the likeliest path. We shall make as little breaking-away as possible from " the solid ground of nature." One of our guides shall be the observed GUIDING PRINCIPLES 141 continuity of natural phenomena, expressed in the generalisation, Natura non facit solium. We have really more material at hand than is currently realised. We have a number of " curves " (express- ing natural laws) which admit of " extrapolation," of prolongation into the unknown. Also, science deals already with several invisible worlds, any one of which may become visible to us in our next life. Besides the principle of continuity, we have also what may be called the principle of value. It is that the present, the facts of to-day, the world we live in, have a permanent and definite value in the whole scheme of the universe ; that they are inter- connected with every other event or fact, past, present, and to come ; that nowhere is there a boun- dary-wai; beyond which no ripple or echo of our events can penetrate. This means much. Among other things, it means that we are here and now in touch with the conditions of the future life, and that the future world and its denizens are here and now in touch with us, consciously or unconsciously. That being so, we have one supreme test of the truth of any theory we may formulate. It must be ex- tended to the whole world as far as we know it, to every geological era, to every form of life, and must not lead to absurdities and inconsistencies. In fact, it must be thought out to the end, in accordance with all the knowledge hitherto accumulated. This, it may be safely said, has never been done before, nor 142 LIFE AFTER DEATH can it here be attempted, except in general outline. But the way is clearly marked out for us. The light is not so dim but that we can see it, and it only re- mains to tread the path courageously, and advance as far as our strength will carry us. Let us examine some of the popular notions of a future life, and see at what point their absurdity or inconsistency arises. Many of these regard the future life as a mere continuation of this. The Red Indian hunting in his familiar prairies, the Goth fighting his battles daily in Valhalla give us examples of such concep- tions. If they are consistently thought out, they mean organisms resembling those of the earth-life, with clothes and weapons to match. But these, be it remembered, are adapted to life on the surface of this earth, and to nothing else. Transplanted into any other place, they will fit as ill as a key in the wrong lock. Other beliefs adopt the idea of a glorified earthly existence on a glorified earth, or in a place resem- bling something on earth to which a special glory or majesty is attached. Thus we get the Elysian fields, the Mohammedan paradise, the New Jerusalem. All these fall to pieces on the slightest touch of analysis. None of them bear thinking out. Either they are framed on the laws which govern this world (as regards cohesion, gravitation, and the various other natural forces), in which case they become mere POPULAR NOTIONS 143 repetitions of the earth; or these laws are only partially observed, in which case they become quite unthinkable monstrosities; or the laws are quite different, in which case we can apply no human standards of existence or pursuits whatever. Yet human or semi-human forms are postulated in each case. Nearly all the " higher " views of future existence assume a much greater effect of divine ruling in the next world than in this. God is more visible, more approachable, more supreme there than here. For this, again, we have no warrant of any kind. A world outside of God is unthinkable. It would simply be another God, and there is no room for two Universal Centres in a thinkable universe. Our views, vague as they have hitherto been, have been largely coloured by anthropomorphic images. The pagan idea of celestial potentates, who must be praised and conciliated, finds no room in a more enlightened theology. What we can reasonably postulate is just this : that the next world will be under the same beneficent Absolute Rule as this — no more and no less — and that its type of existence will be one which admits of the utilisation of experiences acquired in this life, and the further development of faculties which are only nascent in the highest types evolved in earth-life. CHAPTER III THE SOUL-BODY The self-determining action of the human individual does not contradict the law of the conservation of energy, as Sir Oliver Lodge has shown in " Life and Matter." l The will exerts a directive action, and such directive action involves little or no expenditure of energy. The cushion of the billiard-table expends no energy in deflecting a billiard-ball, nor does the grass expend energy on making a foot-ball rebound. On the contrary, it absorbs energy from the ball. When, however, we come to a " voluntary " deter- mination of direction, there arises the necessity of an expenditure of energy on the instrument by which this direction is effected. By slightly turning a bat or a tennis-racquet this way or that we can produce a large difference in the direction in which a ball will travel after impact. By pulling a trigger, we can liberate a large amount of energy, from which, if we please, we can recover the energy we spent on pulling the trigger. We can make the ratio of the two amounts of energy as great as we please. We can make the energy necessary to 1 Published by Williams & Norgate, London, 1905, *44 THE SOUL-BODY 1 45 liberate the store of energy one-millionth of the latter, or one-billionth, or infinitesimal. Every act of our muscles is some " pulling of the trigger," some influence of the will upon nerve structures, or other structures will govern the storing and liberation of energy. If these " triggers " were removed from the body, the body would be as " dead " and defenceless as an army from whose guns all the triggers had been removed. Whether these triggers form a visible structure of the cell we may leave, for the present, an open question. For ought we know, they may be Darwin's " gemmules," which, however, are supposed to be ultra- visible. Also, they may be contained, perhaps, in nerve cells only. We know that these are among the most important structures of the body, and that they are the first to lose their power of subdivision in the adult. But whatever they are, they must, according to our fundamental assumptions, be material 'particles or structures, i.e. living beings of a low dimensional scale, trained, perhaps, for joint and harmonious action through a prolonged period of co-operation. These particles constitute the soul-body, or, briefly, the soul of the individual. Their structure is further differentiated, some parts being as much more vital than the rest as the particle as a whole is more vital than the rest of the body. These most vital of particles we may take as constituting the " spirit." K 146 THE SOUL-BODY It will be convenient to have a name for the constituent particles of the soul-body. By analogy with a number of biological terms (such as chromo- mere) we will call them psychomeres (soul-particles). They may be somewhat analogous, or possibly identical, with Weismann's " biophores." Wilson says l : " The starting point of his [Weismann's] theory is the hypothesis of De Vries that the chromatin is a congeries or colony of invisible self-propagating vital units or biophores some- what like Darwin's ' gemmules/ each of which has the power of determining the development of a particular quality. Weismann conceives these units as aggregated to form units of a higher order known as ' determinants,' which in turn are grouped to form ' ids,' each of which, for reasons that need not here be specified, is assumed to possess the complete architecture of the germ-plasm charac- teristic of the species. The ' ids ' finally, which are identified with the visible chromatin granules, are arranged in linear series to form ' idants ' or chromosomes. It is assumed further that the ' ids ' differ slightly in a manner corresponding with the individual variations of the species, each chromo- some therefore being a particular group of slightly different germ-plasms, and differing qualitatively from all the others." This view of the great German biologist is a good 1 " The Cell," p. 245. PSYCHOMERES 147 instance of the tendency towards almost indefinite subdivision and grouping. There would be no objection to identifying our " psychomeres " with his " invisible self- propagating vital units called biophores" but for the fact that the chromatin of the nucleus is almost certainly not the only really vital part of the cell. The " cytoplasm " or outer substance most likely contains vital centres also, though these may be incapable of " self-propaga- tion," and our psychomeres, though somewhat con- centrated in the chromatin, must be diffusely disseminated all through the cell. Another observation which somewhat discredits the chromatin as the sole bearer of vitality is that " centrosomes " may arise cle novo from either the cytoplasmic or the nuclear substance, and may play the usual role (whatever that may be) in mitosis. 1 Now this means, not that the new centre of aggre- gation arises out of an undifferentiated mass by spontaneous generation, but that the existing centre, instead of being capable of demonstration by means of dyes, is invisible. The obvious lesson is that we cannot reasonably expect to see the psychomeres. They may possibly be discovered sometime, and the quest for them should prove extremely fascinating, but for the present we must leave the question of their visibility open. Failing an ocular examination, we must endeavour 1 Wilson, " The Cell," p. 309. 148 THE SOUL-BODY in some other way to arrive at a rough idea of their physical properties. Let us place their total weight, at a guess, at one -millionth of the entire body. The nuclear matter is about one-thousandth, so that we are well below that proportion, as we ought to be, after all that has been said. Each cell contains, on the average, 1,000,000,000 atoms, so that 1000 atoms, on the average, of each cell, would go to make up psychomeres, and the total number of atoms in these psychomeres would be something like 10 19 (ten trillions). Their aggregate weight would be 50 milligrams, or about iths of a grain, or the weight of ten postage-stamps. That would be the weight of a human soul ! We must next inquire about their state of aggre- gation. In the physical theory of ionisation and condensation we have become familiar with the fact that the smallest charged particles are the most effective promoters of condensation. In fact, it would suffice to extract a very small proportion of the innumerable electrons within the body to bring about a vigorous condensation in the moist air around it. Noav growth is, to some extent, a phe- nomenon of condensation. It is eminently so in the case of plants, which derive the bulk of their tissue from the carbon dioxide gas of the air. We have reason, therefore, to expect that some, at least, of the psychomeres will resemble electrons, or groups of electrons, rather than atoms. But others may be EXTE ACTION OF THE PSYCHOMERES 1 49 complex molecular groups with abnormal electric properties. That their electric properties are ab- normal, i.e. somewhat different from those of the molecules of " dead " matter, is rendered probable by the peculiar chemical reactions to which many of them give rise, reactions which are at the root of the formation of the more complex " organic " com- pounds. Could we extract all the psychomeres from an adult human body, and leave them in the same mutual positions as before, we should have a kind of gaseous body filling the familiar outline. But the tenuity of the gaseous body would be a thou- sand times greater than that of air. It would, in fact, represent a moderate vacuum. If now its size were reduced so that, instead of some five feet, it were only six inches high, and the other dimen- sions in proportion, it would have just the density of air, and would float freely in it, without any tendency to either rise or fall. In its ordinary form, at which it represents a vacuum of f mm. of mercury, it would float upwards like a balloon, and would not attain its proper level until it had risen some 35 miles into the air, and arrived at or near the upper limit of the atmosphere. These calculations suppose, of course, that the air is excluded from the space between the psycho- meres. There is, as a matter of fact, no valid reason why it should not be. What prevents the I50 THE SOUL-BODY free passage of air through our physical bodies ? Nothing but the cohesion of the tissues. And what is this cohesion ? We do not know, but as every- thing consists of discrete particles, it must be some action between these particles, exerted across inter- vening space. We only know of three such actions : gravitational, electrostatic, and magnetic (electro- dynamic). Of these three, gravitational and mag- netic force are too feeble to account for the actual cohesive force observed. There remains electro- static attraction as the only explanation, and that is the very force with which our psychomeres are, ex hypothesi, most richly endowed. If, therefore, the soul-body has a suitable distribution of electrons, it may possess any desired amount of cohesion and defensive power, without the necessity of having the solidity of our physical bodies. Now suppose that what we call death consists in just this : the psychomeres are withdrawn from the body ; the soul which they constitute continues its life without the ballast it has just discarded. What should we naturally expect to follow ? The physical body will be deprived of its direc- tive elements. Each cell will fall a victim to whatever other directive influences are most power- ful. The processes of transpiration and evaporation will go on unchecked. The cell-life will continue for a little while on the lower planes, but the cell-community will break up. The power of WHAT HAPPENS AT DEATH I 5 I growth and nutrition will be lost. Expenditure will exceed income a thousand-fold. There will be an aimless running down of the machinery, un- balanced by a new winding up. Then there will be stagnation and disintegration. If the body is hermetically sealed up, there will be a very gradual chemical and physical disintegration. If the corpse is embalmed, much of that will be prevented. If it is cremated, the inevitable process of disintegration will be accelerated very considerably. And lastly, if the body is buried, " earth to earth," the work of disintegration will be taken in hand largely by micro-organisms, ever ready and eager to utilise cast-off organic material and perform the necessary work of disinfection and sanitation. Whatever the process may be, the end is the same. The cast-off organism goes the way of all the material which the soul pressed into its service in the course of its earthly life, and cast off again. It becomes of no more value than cast-off clothing, and hair and nails, and air breathed out from the lungs, and all the other cUbris and wastage of the complex organic machine. Not so the soul. Liberated from a slow and clumsy engine of physical activity, it finds itself free, unharnessed, unembarrassed. The most vital parts of the organism are intact. The memories and faculties are keen and alert. There is a sense of adventure, of expectancy, of possibilities but 152 THE SOUL-BODY vaguely felt, of new faculties hardly yet awakened. The community of intelligences is more closely knit than ever. Diseased or deformed conditions can be immediately rectified through the greater power of readjustment of part to part. But the soul will soon learn to adapt itself to the new con- ditions of its existence. What these conditions are we cannot readily discover, but we can make some guesses likely to be near the truth. In doing so, we must be guided by the known laws of the physical world and by the most authentic informa- tion which has yet been obtained with regard to the details of the next life. And firstly, we must consider a little further the process of the withdrawal of the psychomeres from the organism ; in other words, the separation of the soul from the body at death. How is this effected ? And what time is required for the process ? We have assumed, with some reason, that the psychomeres are material aggregates varying from electronic to molecular dimensions, and endowed with a marked electric polarity. These will have to assemble from the interior of every cell, and will have to pass through the cell walls and membranes of all grades of texture and consistency. But that offers no formidable obstacle. It means simply a variation of the process by which all nutrition and metabolism is effected. It proceeds by transpiration THE PROCESS OF SEPARATION 153 and diffusion. Only the roles of the chief actors are reversed. The host, instead of receiving his guests, bids thern adieu and departs. The whole process need not take more than a few minutes. When chloroform is breathed into the lungs, it is diffused through every cell in the body in about seven minutes. And yet chloroform consists of heavy and bulky molecules, each of which contains one atom of carbon, one of hydrogen, and three of chlorine. That all the psychomeres should act on a common impulse is not surprising. They are doing that all the time, waking and sleeping. The directive agents of our organism are ceaselessly active, and all working towards the same end, the efficiency of the machine at the disposal of the commanding intelligence. The sense of solidarity is strongly developed. In disease especially the co-operation of the various directive agencies or psychomeres is most marked. Their activity is raised throughout the body. They are so busy trying to repair the machine that we feel a sense of oppression, of disturbance, uneasiness, or pain. Little leisure is left for the ordinary activities. In fevers and all diseases which threaten the invasion of a rival power in the shape of some species of hostile microbes, the police and territorial armies go forth to battle for dear life, and the raging battle may be read in the rising mercury of the clinical thermometer. A large proportion of the psycho- 154 THE SOUL-BODY meres, in all likelihood, sally forth from their appropriate cells to fight the enemy, leaving the cells to carry on a vegetative existence until their victorious return. But it may happen that the fortunes of war go against the gallant defenders, that the strategic positions have to be abandoned one by one. The structures laboriously built up become untenable. The home armies withdraw to the citadels, and when all is lost, prepare to leave with the honours of war. The cells, thus forsaken, indulge perhaps in an ineffectual and blind struggle on their own account, each one for itself, much as the guerilla warriors of a beaten nation might endeavour to harass its conquerors. But the home forces know when the day is lost. They gradually withdraw from the stricken field, knowing that there will be plenty of work for their valour elsewhere. And so they take leave, compact and undiminished and indestructible, to go where their higher destiny awaits them. Imagine the psychomeres, then, withdrawn from the body, and floating in the air, free to trace out what form they please. If, in the earthy state, the movements were determined by the central will, and movements often repeated became habits, and generated features, how much more will this be the case when the ballast is got rid of! We may imagine some surgings or oscillations before the THE MOMENT AFTER 155 new equilibrium is attained. This equilibrium will be governed by the acquired characters of the individual psychomeres and by the requirements of the new world in which the soul is to live. Those groups which before were concerned in producing motion (chiefly the legs) will now tend to produce motion in the new world. Each group of psycho- meres will endeavour to carry out its function in the new life on somewhat similar lines as before. Possibly, the outline of the earth-body may be retained for some time, and if there is any acquisi- tion of new matter, that may go towards forming about the soul-body a semblance of drapery, that being, in civilised beings, almost as powerful an instinct as any other. But as time passes, we may well suppose that the earth memories are gradually modified, that the gaze is directed upward instead of downward, and that the soul takes its departure from the earth-scene, never more to return to it. If, on the other hand, the earth-memories are difficult to shake off, the soul will cling, more or less permanently, to the surface of the earth, will strive to retain its accustomed outline and char- acteristics, and will attach itself to some object or locality where it is comparatively free from dis- turbance. What kinds of disturbance has it to fear ? Can a soul be cut, or shot, or split in two, or exploded ? These questions are not so difficult to answer as 156 THE SOUL-BODY they seem. Of course a sword or knife can cut through a soul-body, but the soul-body would be little, if any, the worse for it, any more than a swarm of bees would. An explosion might have more of an effect. It might scatter the psychomeres so far apart that they could only with difficulty, and considerable delay, be reassembled. But the telepathic link between them, aided by electrostatic forces, would no doubt heal the wound before long. A soul-body is practically invulnerable by human means. Another question arises concerning the soul- bodies of cripples, and persons deprived by disease of the use of some organ. The answer here is two- fold. In the first place, the organ or limb thus lost may not be necessary in the new state, in which case it will not be formed. If it is necessary, the superior liberty of configuration possessed by the soul-body will easily supply it. The tradition of the organ is there, at all events, and this can be strengthened in various ways, as will be seen later on. The natural form best adapted to motion in air will be something resembling a fish rather than a human being. For we must remember that the soul-body is more of the density of air than of that of water or earth. It is, therefore, peculiarly appro- priate that the early Christians, profoundly con- vinced of the immortality of the soul, should have THE SHAPE OF THE SOUL 157 chosen a fish, IX0Y2, as the symbol of their faith. Recent researches on navigable balloons have brought out the fact that an elongated shape which is broad in front and narrow behind offers the least resistance to motion through a fluid. The shape of birds is also based on this principle, but since they are a good deal heavier than the air they displace, they require wings wherewith to produce the necessary upward impulse. The fish moves not so much by means of its fins — these are only steadying and steering devices — as by means of its tail and the undulatory motions of its whole body. An eel can move rapidly through water, with practically no fins at all. The principle is somewhat the same as that which governs the motion of a gimlet through a piece of wood. If, therefore, the soul-body, discarding its superfluous habits with its useless ballast-body, adapts itself straightway to its new environment, it will take the shape of a fish, or rather a flame. It will, like the spirit at the Pentecost, become a tongue of fire ! If it hovers about a fairy bush, such as the west of Ireland can tell of, that bush will become a burning bush such as Moses saw. If of great size, the soul-body may even appear as a pillar of cloud by day, and a pillar of fire by night. On a smaller scale, it may represent a will-o'-the-wisp and the flitting fairy -lights which so often accom- pany supernormal phenomena. 158 THE SOUL-BODY Its transit through the air may be extremely rapid. It only depends upon the energy available within it, and, besides the end-on method of pro- pulsion which we utilise in the guidable balloon, it may be endowed with a motion resembling that of vortex rings, which traverse the air rapidly without any risk of losing their coherence or identity. Whoever watches a swarm of midges dancing in the twilight must have been struck with their cohesion. They attach themselves to some bush or elevated object and, although in rapid motion, appear to keep that connection through many vicissitudes. A gust of wind blows them aside, but the connection with the bush is unbroken, and they collect in its neighbourhood like a flag about a flag- staff. They keep their peculiar evolutions through it all. These evolutions no doubt serve some social purpose. They are made possible by the energy stored up in each midge. But the general effect is that of some busy living organism inhabiting the air, indifferent to the passage of a more ponderable body like our own, and behaving as one, though made up of some 10,000 independent units. Now, instead of 10,000 units,take 25,000,000,000,000,000 units (the cells of our body) and from each of these extract one-millionth of its subtance. Is it any stretch of the imagination to suppose that these 25,000,000,000,000,000 extracts may collaborate and behave like a single well-organised being, ani- EARTH-MEMORIES I 59 mated by a master-impulse or swayed by a master- will ? After all, our bodies, even as they stand, are, according to the views now prevailing in physical science, mere swarms of molecules, atoms, and electrons, held together by electric and magnetic forces. If these can tread the earth and stem the water, why should not the aerial soul-body be equally stable in the gaseous state, and equally adapted to the life aerial ? If, for any reason, the earth memories of the soul should be reawakened, and become dominant, it can assume its accustomed earth-form, and any other form, even as in the Homeric poems the gods assumed the guise of various mortals. The psycho- meres need only resume their latent function of assimilating matter. The invisible soul-body will become, first, a fine mist, then a cloud, a tall pillar of filmy vapour, from which a complete form, moulded and clothed to suit the character assumed, would then emerge, to walk the earth as before for a little while, and to dissolve again into mist and become once more invisible. The inhabitants of the earth would then see a ghost, and be afraid, although, truth to tell, they would have more reason to be afraid of anything in a permanent earthly shape rather than of the materialised soul venturing back to its old haunts in a state of extremely unstable equilibrium, and ill equipped for any effective action, whether for good or ill. CHAPTER IV THE SOUL-WORLD Having arrived at a view of the soul-body which> even if not true, is certainly intelligible and not unreasonable, we must proceed to locate its where- abouts, its abode, its natural element. We have a larger choice of localities, divisible into : (a) Non-Euclidian space ; (b) Three-dimensional space, which may be (1) unconnected with the earth; or (2) connected with it. Let us discuss these in order. (a) Non-Euclidian Space. — It has been a favourite speculation in connection with supernormal pheno- mena to locate their cause in four-dimensional or other non-Euclidian space. Thus, Professor Zollner x explained a number of curious knot-tying experi- ments by reference to a fourth dimension, pointing out that what would be to us a knot incapable of resolution (such as a knot in a string forming a ring, or in a rubber band, or a ring cut out of a single piece of leather) might be tied and untied through the intermediary of a fourth-dimension movement, just as a flat loop would be unresolvable 1 See his " Transcendental Physics." 160 THE SOUL-WOKLD l6l in two-dimensional space, but resolvable in our space. Now this line of argument, fascinating and alluring though it may be, is contrary to the principle of economy. It is best and safest to make the minimum of new assumptions, and to make, if possible, no assumptions contrary to our general experience. An explanation is, or should be, the reduction of an apparently abnormal pheno- menon to a group of known phenomena. A wholly novel cause is only assignable when a number of independent phenomena separately points towards it, and when no known cause is available. Now a fourth dimension is not in accordance with any experience elsewhere, and it is much more logical and scientific to assign even a complex cause con- sisting of known elements rather than a simpler cause containing an entirely new element. Zollner's experiences are equally explicable on the assumption that one solid can penetrate through the substance of another solid, a possibility which the molecular structure of even the most solid matter renders quite obvious. To assign supernormal phenomena to a fourth dimension is therefore almost as bad as to assign them to no cause at all, i.e. to declare them to be " miracles " pure and simple. Non-Euclidian space must be ruled out. It is the negation of space, and the negation of reason. L 1 62 THE SOUL-WORLD (b) Three-dimensional Space. — In our Euclidian space, with, its three dimensions of length, breadth, and thickness, there is room for an infinite series of worlds within worlds, and for all the earths and heavens and hells that have ever been imagined or alleged to exist. We need not go outside it to find room for our heaven. If we are idealists of the old school, and regard the whole visible universe as but an illusion, a " veil of Maya," we may even abrogate the actuality of matter, and have an infinite three-dimensional vacuum wherein to locate what beings we please. But such an assump- tion is contrary to the principle of continuity and the principle of value, which maintain that there is an absolute reality (a living reality) behind what we perceive as matter, a reality with which we can never, in any state of existence, quite lose touch. In three-dimensional space, we have again to take our choice between space which is, and space which is not, connected with our earth. If the earth is ignored, we have at least three orders of universes to select from. These are — 1. The terrene world, in which the planets as we know them act as such; 2. The infra-world, whose planets are what we call electrons ; 3. The supra-world, in which our galactic uni- verse probably plays the part of a minute organism. 1 1 See the author's " Two New Worlds." THE CHOICE OF A WORLD 1 63 The supra-world and infra-world are immediately excluded from our measurable future by their scale of dimensions. The beings which inhabit them enter into our lives, it is true, but not in a deter- mining 1 manner. We utilise the social laws of the infra-world to compass our own ends, and our social laws are no doubt similarly utilised by the supra- beings. But that arrangement leaves us a large margin of liberty, and that liberty we are during our earth-life training ourselves to acquire and enlarge. We find the abode of the soul thus narrowed down to our own planetary dimensions. Even then we have plenty of choice. We have all the starry universe open to us, as well as a number of planets of a size comparable to our earth. Then there is the moon, or the moons of other planets. There are the comets, there is open space, there' is the sun itself. Which of all these is the heaven we are looking for ? It is little use looking to the far-off stars, or beyond them, for the abode of the blest. Astronomy has taught us that there is nothing very peculiar about far-away stars. They are much like our own sun. There is more of a strange world to be encountered 30 miles up in the atmosphere than 50,000,000 miles away, on the surface of Mars. If we want strange forms of existence, let us try to imagine the inner consciousness of a fish 1 64 THE SOUL-WOKLD or a tree. It is difficult enough, surely. No, we must resolutely combat the tendency to look for the unseen beyond the seen. The unseen is all about us. But for the accident which gave us eyes, everything about us would be " unseen." As it is, a single octave in the gamut of light-waves impresses our retina, revealing a very small pro- portion of what would be visible to a more com- pletely equipped intelligence. And then, why look to the moon and the planets ? For aught we know, they may be already in posses- sion of intelligences not far removed from our own, who might well resent our intrusion. Why not seek our heaven on ej-rth ? The earth is practically unknown to us. Six miles above sea- level clears the highest mountain. Ten miles below it reaches the lowest ocean-bottom. One mile underground touches bottom in the deepest pit. It is at the most one-eighth per cent, of the total thickness of the earth, the thickness of a thin scalp compared with the total stature of the body, the paper which covers the terrestrial globe compared with the globe itself! And the layer which supports " life " on our earth would be less than the thickness of the varnish on the paper. The known portion of the earth is comparable to a thin soap-bubble. All within and without the liquid layer is unknown. The conditions of our existence give us no direct access to the regions CLAIMS OF OUR ATMOSPHERE 165 outside, and whatever information we can accumu- late is obtained indirectly by reasoning from analogy. There is, therefore, no necessity to go beyond the earth to seek new worlds in which the soul may dwell. The earth offers boundless variety and endless possibilities of existence. Even Socrates, with his limited resources, could enlarge upon the possible delights of the upper regions of the air for beings fitted to dwell in them. 1 We have only to choose a region where our soul-bodies shall have reasonable space and liberty, free from over- crowding, and from interference from (and with) our earth-life. Such a region is, most appropriately, the atmos- phere. I hope to show in what follows that the earth's atmosphere is a possible and exceedingly probable physical location for the soul-bodies of departed men. It may look like a return to ancient superstition, but that the ancients, and people at all times, looked upward for their future abode is no argu- ment against that abode being actually located there. It may be taken, on the contrary, as an indication of a correct instinct, unconsciously evolved perhaps from slight but gradually accumulated im- pulses in that direction. We shall not use the popular view as an argument in our favour, but base our case on quite other considerations. The atmosphere extends for at least 100 miles 1 See Plato's " Phsedo." 1 66 THE SOUL-WORLD above the earth's surface. Its lower surface (that which rests upon the ground) has an area of 800,000,000 square miles, and its upper surface has an area of 840,000,000 square miles. Its volume is at least 80,000,000,000 cubic miles. This means that if the souls of all human beings that have lived and died for the last twelve centuries were distributed at equal intervals throughout the atmos- phere, they would be a mile apart ! They would, indeed, be very lonely and isolated. If we made the distance half a mile, we could find room for the human population of the last 10,000 years, with plenty of open space in which to move about. The average distance between living human beings on the land surface at the present time is one- third of a mile. If this density of population were extended to the atmosphere, the latter would be able to accommodate the human souls that lived on earth for the last 32,000 years. We see, therefore, that no quantitative difficulty is encountered by our hypothesis so far. We can hold out a prospect of at least 30,000 years' occupa- tion of a place within the atmosphere after the surface life of threescore years and ten — surely a term well worth accepting as a substantial instal- ment of immortality. When that term has expired, we may well suppose that the individual is prepared to " move on " into interplanetary space, and leave the earth behind. THE UPPER AIR 1 67 But what kind of existence would this aerial existence be ? Can we determine, even if only provisionally, some of its conditions ? As already stated, we know very little of the higher strata of the atmosphere. The highest man- bearing balloon voyage is 6 miles, and that is also the height of the highest mountain-peak. Recently, some attempts have been made to explore the higher strata of the atmosphere by means of test balloons (ballons-sondes), notably at the Trappes Observatory, near Paris. One of the most interest- ing results is the discovery of a comparatively warm stratum some distance above the earth. This is referred to by a recent writer as follows : l — " While not presuming to offer an explanation of the isothermal or relatively warm stratum in the high atmosphere, which the recent letters in Nature have made known to others than meteorologists, I desire to point out that it is probably a universal phenomenon, existing at some height all around the globe. This inversion of temperature was first discovered by M. Teisserenc de Bort with the ballons - sondes sent up from his observatory at Trappes, near Paris, in 1901, and almost simul- taneously by Professor Assmann from similar German observations. Since then almost all the balloons which have risen more than 40,000 feet above Central Europe (that is, near latitude 50°) 1 A. L. Rotch, in Nature for May 7, 1908. 1 68 THE SOUL-WORLD have penetrated this stratum, without, however, determining its upper limit. Teisserenc de Bort early showed that its height above the earth, to the extent of 8000 feet, varied directly with the barometric pressure at the ground. Mr. Dines {Nature, p. 390) gives the average height of the isothermal layer above England as 35,000 feet, with extremes of nearly 50 per cent, of the mean. Observations conducted last March by our indefatigable French colleague, Teisserenc de Bort, in Sweden, just within the Arctic circle, showed that the minimum temperature occurred at nearly the same height as at Trap pes, namely, 36,000 feet, although Professor Hergesell, who made use of ballons-sondes over the Arctic Ocean, near latitude 75° N., during the summer of 1906, concluded that the isothermal stratum there sank as low as 23,000 feet. " During the past three years the writer has despatched seventy-seven ballons - sondes from St. Louis, U.S.A., latitude 38° N., and most of those which rose higher than 43,000 feet entered the inverted stratum of temperature. This was found to be somewhat lower in summer, but the follow- ing marked inversions were noted last autumn : October 8, the minimum temperature of —90° Fahr. occurred at 47,600 feet, whereas at the maximum altitude of 54,100 feet the temperature had risen to — 72° ; October 10, the lowest tempera- RECENT RESEARCHES 1 69 ture of - 80° was found at 39,700 feet, while - 69° was recorded at 42,200 feet, showing a descent of nearly 8000 feet in the temperature-inversion within two days. The expedition sent out jointly by M. Teisserenc de Bort and the writer, on the former's steam yacht Otaria, to sound the atmosphere over the tropical Atlantic during the summer of 1906, launched ballons-sondes both north and south of the equator within the tropics, and although some of these balloons rose to nearly 50,000 feet, they gave no indication of an iso- thermal stratum. In fact, the paradoxical fact was established that in summer it is colder eight miles above the thermal equator than it is in winter at the same height in north temperate regions. This results from the more rapid decrease of temperature in the tropics and the absence of the numerous temporary inversions which, as Mr. Dines has pointed out, are common in our regions below 10,000 feet. If, therefore, as seems probable, the isothermal or relatively warm stratum does exist in the tropical and equatorial regions, it must lie at a height exceeding 50,000 feet, from which height, as the data quoted show, it gradually descends towards the Pole, at least in the northern hemisphere." We also know that about 30 miles above the ground the air is a comparatively good conductor of electricity. It is this conducting layer of the atmosphere which is probably most effective in I/O THE SOUL-WORLD absorbing the ultra-violet rays of the sun. Now what may we conclude from this ? That a. being specially sensitive to ultra-violet light would have an impression of brightness above that stratum, and of darkness below it. The stratum itself would appear like a dark cloud-bank (although quite transparent to us) and would make a pretty sharp boundary between the upper and lower regions of the atmosphere. The regular succession of day and night would be the same as with us, and this succession would no doubt bring about a periodical change of activity just as it does in our case. Clouds in our sense are confined to the lower strata of the atmosphere, but storms are not. Indeed, the modern theory maintains that all storms originate in the higher strata of the atmosphere, and are of solar or inter- stellar origin. It is just possible that some one may propound the theory that they are of psychic origin, and that all atmospheric precipitations, governed as they are by wind and by the ionisation of the atmosphere, are intimately associated with the distribution and motion of the psychic entities of the upper air, whether they be conscious of it or not. In that case we may look for a revival, if not of Jupiter Pluvius, at least of the practice of praying for rain, or for fine weather. Although the atmosphere has no permanent features, like the earth, the landscape of the latter ATMOSPHERIC STRATA 171 has a decided influence upon the state of the lower strata. The deflecting action of a hill upon a horizontal current of air may be felt as high as 30,000 feet, as the ballons-sondes observations have shown. Hills have also a decided influence upon the electric potential gradient, and peaks sometimes acquire a negative potential many thousand volts higher than the surrounding air. The extreme cold of the upper air has no terrors for a being which has no liquid in its constitution. And after all, the minimum of —90° Fahr. is not below the coldest temperature observed on the ground within the north polar circle. If human beings in the flesh have survived that, a disem- bodied spirit need have no anxiety on the matter. Life in the atmosphere, " on the wing," so to speak, is not quite like anything we are familiar with. The body of a fish is of the same density as water. A slight change in its density would send the fish right up to the surface or right down to the bottom. If the density of a fish body were in- creased by as little as one part in 10,000, it would sink at least 60 feet below the surface, and a com- pression of 1 per cent, would send it down a mile. A similar change in density, taking place in a balloon, or in any object floating in the air, would alter its altitude by not more than 300 feet. This is because air is very much more compressible than water. If a body kept its density constant, it 172 THE SOUL-WORLD would float at a nearly constant level in the air, much like a vessel rocked on the waves. The observed reversal of the temperature gradient in the upper air referred to on p. 168 would have the effect of increasing the buoyancy of the air above the plane of reversal by making the density gradient steeper. If, however, a body ever fell below the coldest stratum it would get into a region of very shallow density gradients, where the density in- creased only slowly with decreasing height, and might have to fall a considerable distance before regaining its equilibrium. If we wanted to indulge in a somewhat wild guess, we might say that this region of maximum cold, the region where the temperature gradient is reversed, is a true and effective division which separates two distinct por- tions of the atmosphere, and therefore also two distinct soul-worlds. To attain the upper region, it would be necessary for any soul to have a small weight per volume, i.e. a low density, which might either mean a great tenuity and lightness of the psychomeres, or sufficient energy to fill out and " effectively occupy " an exceptionally large space. Hitherto we have only investigated the conditions of rest and motion in the atmospheric world, as far as our very rough and incomplete methods will allow. But there are, of course, a great many other problems pressing for solution. Life does not con- sist solely in motion. Plant-life, indeed, dispenses with CONDITIONS OF LIFE 1 73 all locomotion. In animals, locomotion is a primary- necessity. But that is largely because they are in- capable of absorbing energy direct from sunlight, and have to move about to acquire it at second-hand as best they can. With us, the necessity for motion has not ceased, but its main object is not nutrition, but social activity. Some people, indeed, are never stationary in one place unless they are either eating or sleeping. In a more refined state of existence this distinction may become still more marked. The slight energy required for motion may possibly be derived from the ultra-violet light of the sun direct, and the main object of motion may be social rather than physiological. This would do away with all necessity for digestion and respiration and cir- culation, and would simplify anatomy very con- siderably. It would then remain to be seen whether any muscles, nerves, and special sense organs were required. As regards muscles we might reply in the affirmative. For since the sun is not always \ shining, and there is no other equally powerful supply to take its place, there must be some way of storing the erergy for use when required. Our muscles are such stores of energy, and we can well imagine groups of psychomeres set apart with the special object of acting as stores of energy. As regards sense organs, it is evident that eyes like our own would be very nearly useless. The chief object of organs of vision would be the per- 174 THE SOUL-WORLD ception of neighbouring soul-bodies. These are invisible to mortal eyes, and therefore the eyes of the soul must be of quite a different structure. The ordinary laws of refraction cannot apply to them since they are transparent to our light waves. There may be specialised organs based on a different principle, or there may be just the generalised sensibility which we find in the infusoria. The latter is rendered probable by certain experiences of ecstasy, as well as the curious locations of sight in the knee-joint, &c, exhibited by some hysteric patients. Life in the soul-world thus probably consists in a greatly vivified intercourse of " kindred souls." We can imagine that what we call a " play of features " is generalised into an expressiveness of the soul-body as a whole, which excludes all deceit and falsehood and enables souls to group themselves readily ac- cording to their sense of kinship. Such groupings, of course, may, like their earthly counterparts, be only temporary. Whether there is any amalgama- tion or true fusion of souls must, of course, remain an open question. If there is, the question of the " over-production " of individuals finds an easy solution. We need only assume that for every individual that becomes two (as in birth), two individuals become one. Thus the number of indi- viduals on the planet might remain sensibly the same. CHAPTER V INTERCOMMUNICATION Having arrived at a consistent and coherent con- ception of the soul-body and the soul-world, we must next examine the relations which exist be- tween our earth-world and the soul-world. Strictly speaking, the soul-world is also an earth-world, as it belongs to our planet. But we will use the term " earth-world " to denote that thin layer of the earth's surface which supports organic life, and which is supposed by materialists to be the only seat of life in the universe. The soul-world, by our hypothesis, is the atmos- phere, and more especially the upper atmosphere, which is illuminated by ultra-violet light from the sun in the daytime, and by a faint glow of ultra- violet light from the unveiled stars at night. How do these two worlds appear to each other ? To us, the soul-world is a wide flat dome over- head, blue in the daytime and nearly black at night, often obscured by clouds of fantastic shapes, which diffuse the sunlight and intercept the light of the stars. We observe the enterprising tribe of birds traversing the air at some distance above the 1 76 INTERCOMMUNICATION ground, and hope to follow in their tracks in the near future. On a cloudless day the sky hangs over us like a vast blue crystalline globe, without a trace of structure or differentiation, and we look longingly, but in vain, for any sign of recognition, any familiar face or object, in that vast and ap- parently vacant expanse. True, a polariscope shows us that the light from the sky is not uniform in all directions, and reveals some kind of a " structure " in the various parts of it. But our unaided eyes see nothing but uniformity, sameness, the symbol of peace, of eternity, of nothingness, of Nirvana, the end and consummation of all things. And now look at the reverse of the medal. A soul floating some 30 or 40 miles above the ground, above a summer-hot landscape, would see nothing but clouds below, even though to us the sky be cloudless. The clouds would consist of masses of ionised air which absorb or reflect the ultra-violet light to which alone the soul's vision is attuned. Below these clouds there would be a dim light resembling what we would call moonlight, consisting of the small proportion of ultra-violet light transmitted to the earth, and this again would be all but lost in the denser atmosphere and clouds of ionisation nearer the earth's surface. The sunlit landscape would appear to the soul much as the bottom of a rather muddy pond would appear to us. DIFFICULTIES OF INTERCOURSE 177 The proportion of people who care to dip into muddy pools and investigate their aquatic life is not large among mortals. And so we may imagine that it is not usual among souls to haunt the haunts of men in the earth-world, and if any of them do, they will be the exception rather than the rule, and will do so under some very powerful impulse which overrides their natural disposition and takes them out of their natural element. On our side, the temptation to penetrate into the upper regions of the soul-world is not great either. Our bodies are quite unadapted to life in the upper air. If we got there, we should see nothing, and would find ourselves as uncomfortable as a fish out of water. Intercourse between the earth-world and the soul-world requires a modification in the denizens of either the one or the other before it is practicable. That is to say, souls must become like men, or men must become like souls, before they can commune on anything like equal terms. As matters stand, the vast majority of disembodied souls are inacces- sible to us, and we to them. It is not a question of superiority. If the souls have a superior kind of existence, if they are more free and unfettered, more mobile, better able to express and embody their inmost thoughts, they are not therefore superior to us, who surpass them, most probably, M I 7 8 INTERCOMMUNICATION in power over the solid and liquid states of matter, and reign supreme on the crust of the globe. Our spheres of influence are separate. Our interests and pursuits are different. There is not necessarily- more sympathy between us and them than there is between different animal species. Look at the human race on earth ! Do not rivalry, competi- tion, mutual envy, and hostility have more to say to our daily conduct than sympathy and com- passion ? Is there always love between brothers, or even between parents and children ? Is not love I the exception rather than the rule ? Then how shall we feel a love for beings in another world with whom we may have even less in common ? We can quite imagine a state of feeling amounting to an " armed peace " between the earth-world and the soul-world, each world guarding its frontiers from aggression and from the immigration of " un- desirable aliens." What complicates matters is that we are pouring a ceaseless stream of very mixed entities — some 50,000,000 per annum — into the soul-world every year. Some of these are not fit to be received there, and are possibly sent back to prowl about the earth until they find a more auspicious opportunity of rising. But this pressure from below may be a valuable incentive towards further development for the higher strata of entities, just as the encroachments of bacilli and insects are to us. We find a teeming life below us, which will PERMANENT RELATION'S I 79 overcome us unless we make our position solid and impregnable, and carefully and vigilantly guard the sphere we wish to reserve for our own use. Some- thing like the same state of things may prevail as between our earth-world and the soul-world. It may be a question, less of hostility or sympathy than of " live and let live," of mutual adjustment and toleration. If, in addition, certain bonds of affection apparently severed by death are strong- enough to withstand the tension across the gulf, there may be a constant stream of thought-com- munication passing between inhabitants of this world and the next, and even an exchange of visits in special cases. That there is no absolute separation between the inhabitants . of the two worlds is clear from our hypothesis, which regards all intelligences as rays from the same centre. But that kind of connection also links us with the most " malignant " fiend, and does not exclude fierce hostility. An intermediate linkage would be a surer bond of friendship. This ought to be provided by the continuity that exists between the human race extant and those that have " gone before." But blood-relationship is no sure guarantee against parricide and fratricide, and a link of close sympathy is often forged of quite different elements, such as community of interest and of work. We may put it down as a pretty safe rule that ISO INTERCOMMUNICATION wherever communication is desirable and mutually profitable, there it will sooner or later be established. We may treat with the soul-world as " a sovereign State with a sovereign State." Our earth-world has its own dignity, and its own responsibilities, which no other world, high or low, can deprive or relieve us of. We must solve our own problems in our own manner, by the light of our own in- tellectual resources. We are constantly asserting that right here, ruthlessly and pitilessly in many ways, as, for instance, with regard to many animal species less powerful than ourselves. We by no means agree as a race upon any single policy. Within the human race there are many inde- pendent communities, largely in a state of rivalry or hostility towards each other. Each evolves, by long experience, its own principles of conduct, its own ethics, its own ideal of good. It endeavours to carry out those ideals, deeming them the best, or even the only good. The hostile community evolves different ideals, which, in the conflict between the two, prevail or go under. The better survives, and mankind at large is the richer by a valuable experience, a valuable addition to its ethical evolution. If we are the vanquished, we say that it is a triumph of evil. If we are the victors, we call it a triumph of good. After a lapse of time, mankind recognises that that was not a Manichean struggle between good and RIVALRY OF IDEALS l8l evil, but between good and better. Whether a thing is to be ranked as good or as better depends upon the area to which it applies. A thief pursues his own good only. His ideal, applied all round, would mean anarchy and universal poverty. Therefore his ideal is " bad," and the community sees to it that a better ideal prevails. Let us apply this line of reasoning to the question of our relations with the soul-world. We have certain ideals which we are steadily realising here on earth. They include such things as safety, liberty, self-development, increase of knowledge, facility of motion, avoidance of pain and disease, general stability, encouragement of the arts and all that makes life beautiful. We comprise all this in the single word civilisation. It is our highest earthly good. All education, all reform, all public policies are judged by the manner in which they affect this good, favourably or unfavourably. If any one wishes to bring about a reform, a new departure, he must persuade the community that it would be for the public good. If it is already in force elsewhere, he must point out its good results, and prove that its adoption would prove equally beneficial at home. If he proves insufficiently per- suasive, he can try other methods. He can adopt the reform himself, and persuade his friends to do the same. He will then be judged by the number and the determination of his friends. The good he I 8 2 INTERCOMMUNICATION and his friends experience will be tested by the amount of their unwillingness to give up the reform. If they are willing to go to prison for it, they may carry the day. What was judged bad or even criminal may then be judged good and commend- able, and worthy of imitation. It may be adopted by the entire community. The reform will become a betterment, and will vanquish the antecedent good. All ethics thus resolves itself into a competition, a race. All evil is comparative. We must take care that we can stand comparison. In so far as we cannot, we shall be condemned. What is the safest guide towards this end ? It is love, it is sympathy. By it we enlarge the area of our own good, and make it include our neigh- bour's good. Love is a higher linkage, a knotting of rays above our own plane. Love bars out cruelty and treachery. It does not bar out a good straight fight. How will any possible intercourse with the soul- world affect our public policies ? It will be judged by its effect on civilisation. In fact, we might say it has been judged by that, and has heretofore been found wanting, and has accordingly been abolished. In the days of Troy, the gods fought hand to hand with mortals. The gods of Persia prevailed over those of Babylon, the gods of Greece over Persia. All ancient records are full of apparitions of gods SUPPRESSION" OF INTERCOURSE 1 83 and angels, of wizards and soothsayers, of demons of the air and goblins of the deep. Men go out of their bodies and devils enter them. Apollo appears out of a cloud Nubc candentes umeros amictus and disappears as he came. Signs and wonders appear in the sky. People go about who possess all kinds of uncanny powers and occult lore. This goes on for centuries, until the days of the Press and the national school. Learning becomes general, the voice of the learned reaches farther than the university lecture hall. It is heard all over the land, it is heard throughout the masses of the population. The nation becomes of one mind, and bears the imprint of its own master-minds. These master-minds ponder over the uncertainty, the havoc wrought by those demons and witches and apparitions. They conclude that they ought to be stamped out. The population, in a mad frenzy, goes and stamps them out. The next generation know them no more. The young devotees of science grow up unaware of their existence. The young devotees grow up, and become master-minds. These master-minds proclaim aloud that such things do not exist, do not occur. Nay, more, they never did exist, they never took place. It was all a de- lusion, due to well-known laws of popular fallacy. All present-day reports of apparitions are instances 1 84 INTERCOMMUNICATION of these well-known laws of popular fallacy. Being such, they must not be taken seriously, or, if any one does take them seriously, the proper place for him is the lunatic asylum. And thus it comes about that all the fairies, pixies, sylphs, and gnomes fly before the flaring light of science. They are not so much sent away as explained away, and that, in a large and well- organised community, is very nearly as good, and suffices for all practical purposes. The absence of all recognised forms of communi- cation with the soul-world in recent times is due to the concentration of attention on the things of our earth-world. The effect of such concentration of attention in obscuring other things is a common- place of psychology. Nevertheless, we cannot be certain that both the possibility and desirability of communication with the soul-world may not again very prominently occupy the attention of mankind. A small begin- ning (if it is a beginning) has been made within the last fifty years, first in America, then in England, and lately in Italy and elsewhere. The results, broadly speaking, have made out a strong case for the possibility of such communication. The general desirability of it may still be a moot point, but in any case, no disasters, and no inconveniences worth speaking of, have occurred through the tentative efforts so far made ; and that is saying more in its METHODS OF COMMUNICATION I 85 favour than can be alleged in many new departures of, say, surgery or bacteriology. Without entering into the discussion of any com- munications, real or alleged, between this world and the next, we can arrive at some general principles which most probably regulate such communications. The method of communication which we adopt among ourselves consists chiefly in certain audible or visible signals and symbols, each of which we are educated to associate with a certain idea or experi- ence of our own. That is language. The method of communication between souls is probably more direct, owing to the greater mobility and expressive- ness of the soul-bodies themselves. It consists in what we would call thought-reading and face-read- ing, or their equivalents. To communicate with the soul-world, either of these methods must be used. The souls must use our sign-language, or we must acquire their thought-transference. There is evi- dence to show, with a high degree of probability, that both methods are in force. In religious ecstasy, in inspiration and illumination, in the bursts of genius, in moments of crisis, in the moment of death, we have glimpses of this direct receptivity, this filling of the whole being with a flood of thought or emo- tion, which most probably characterises life in the soul-world. On the other hand, we have the records of trance-speaking, automatic writing, and the per- cussion and motion of objects to show that some 1 86 INTERCOMMUNICATION intelligence other than human is working along the customary human channels. When a soul attempts to do this, the obvious plan Avould be for it to throw itself into a kind of " trance " in which it would recall the conditions of its earth-life. This would be most easily accomplished by entering into close rapport with some suitable living person whose or- ganism might be controlled by the visitor from the soul-world for temporary purposes of communica- tion. This rapport, for aught we know, may take the form of a temporary physical amalgamation of the embodied and disembodied souls, which would correspond to what the ancients called " possession." Or the embodied soul might even be temporarily disembodied, and lend its organism for a time to the stranger. The latter would, under favourable conditions, find no difficulty in controlling the bor- rowed organism for a time. This control might take the form of speaking or writing under control, perhaps the readiest and most satisfactory method of communication. If the controlling soul wishes for a temporary return to earth-life, the natural thing would be to exert its old condensing and organising powers on earthly matter. The matter so used must be specially adapted to this purpose, just as animal and vegetable tissues are specially adapted to our own growth and nutrition, and such a supply of matter would most readily be found within the borrowed organism. A partially or APPARITIONS 187 wholly "materialised" organism might thus be temporarily produced, and be afterwards as rapidly dematerialised. It goes without saying that a pro- cess of this kind would expose the borrowed organ- ism to unknown dangers, and might be a matter of very great difficulty and delicacy. In any case, the " apparition " would derive its characteristics from the earth-memories of the " controlled " person or medium, and from any traces of earth-memories which might be possessed or temporarily recalled by the visiting soul. It would be strongly influenced by the general character of those present and by the surroundings. Its conditio sine qud non would be a recollection, a familiarity with the temporary earthly surroundings, and nothing unusual in word or action need be looked for. The control of an earthly organism by a being from the soul-world requires a state of passivity in the former. This state is naturally greater in the night than in the daytime, greater in the dark than in the light. We might therefore expect better conditions in the dark than in a bright light. We need not expect much intelligible information from any such communications. In the first place, they would naturally be made under conditions anything but favourable to intelligent communica- tion. The spheres of life are more different than those of men and of fishes, and whatever connection is established is biassed and strongly coloured by the I 8 8 INTERCOMMUNICATION human medium. And further, we cannot reason- ably expect anything new or valuable about our own world from beings who naturally belong to another. It would be as reasonable to expect from my next-door neighbour new information concern- ing the state of my coal-supply or the pickles in my pantry. If an attempt is made to inform us concerning life in the soul-world, such information will be found extremely difficult to impart and to translate, so to speak, into the language of the reci- pients, who may have no equivalent experience to appeal to. Yet with patience and the taking of pains we might enter into the life of the soul-world to the extent, at all events, to which we have entered into the life of ancient Egypt since we began to decipher the hieroglyphs. But, taking all the circumstances into consideration, we cannot expect to obtain satis- factory results without taking very much more trouble about it than Egyptologist ever took. And who is there at present prepared to face such a task, even for the immense reward it offers ? The inevitable communication between the two worlds which takes place at the death of one of us remains to be considered. May we not think that perhaps some loving welcome awaits us at death, similar to the welcome which greeted us at birth ? Is there not, perhaps, an instinct for the increase of soul-life which rules the soul-world, just as the NO TERRORS AHEAD I 89 silent impulse towards child-life rules this ? Does not the divine impulse towards the cherishing and protecting of inexperience extend also into the soul- world, and urge its wise and beautiful inhabitants to minister to the newly born soul-body with the keen delight which parents feel in ministering to their earthly offspring ? Of this I am certain, that if any terror awaited us beyond, if the soul-world were not at least as fair and as good to live in as this, there would long ago have been such a steady back- ward pressure of fear and repugnance as would have sufficed to counterbalance the forward pressure of the human race. The race, in its horror of death, would have had a horror of life, and a horror of generating life, which would ages ago have dried up the springs of fertility and made an end of the human race. The race would have been like a vast crowd surging towards an abyss, and warned of it by the vague disturbance ahead, the cries of distress, the straining backward, the gathering panic. No, we may be certain that nothing worse awaits us than the worst we experience in this earthly life. And for aught we can dimly foresee, most of our familiar terrors will be eliminated. Falsehood and uncertainty are two of our greatest curses, and these will almost certainly become very much mitigated. The conditions of the new life are such as to reduce them to a minimum. Of the elimination of disease and death I need 1 90 INTERCOMMUNICATION not speak. The former may possibly be eliminated from earth-life before very long, or reduced to a single form, that of a prolonged and healing sleep. And as regards death, we shall then know that what we formerly understood by that is non-existent. CHAPTER VI THE WIDER PROBLEMS OF IMMORTALITY Hitherto we have only dealt with the human aspect of immortality, or rather, of this world and the next. The general problem of immortality is immeasurably wider. It includes questions as to the fate of lower organisms, the existence of organisms far beyond the human scale, of in- habitants of other stars and planets, and of inter- stellar space. We can only touch the fringe of these vast problems, and need only deal with them in so far as they affect our present state and our immediate prospects hereafter. Do animals possess souls ? According to the general lines of our argument, we must answer most decidedly : they do. Their organisms are as complex as our own. They require similar directing centres or psychomeres. Their mental faculties are, as a rule, greatly underrated, largely on account of the difficulty we experience in "putting ourselves in their place." Indeed, we may seriously doubt whether ants and bees, for instance, are, in their own sphere, in any way inferior to ourselves, or, if they I92 THE WIDER PROBLEMS OP IMMORTALITY are, whether their partial inferiority in some things is not compensated by a superiority in others. Do they survive then, also ? Are they, too, immortal, like ourselves ? We can allege no sufficient reason why they should not be ! The idea that noxious insects, for instance, may accompany us and confront us in the soul-world is enough to fill some sensitive minds with horror and loathing. They would, at that price, rather not have immortality. They would prefer annihilation. But let us look at this question rationally and coolly. In the first place, we may possibly never come near them. They may be thoroughly " earth- bound," and passing through a cycle of rapid rein- carnations, they may, if they people the atmosphere at all, be confined to its lowest strata. If they inhabit the soul-world itself, they may fulfil a useful function there, something like horses and cows and pet canaries in this. For the practices and pursuits which make them objectionable here will be neces- sarily modified by the change of world and of state of aggregation. With plants the case is somewhat different, though not fundamentally different. A plant is a much looser aggregation of cell communities than an animal. A flower, plucked from the stem, is cap- able of blooming for some time in a flower-glass. When it dies, it is quite possible that the knot PERMANENT IMMORTALITY 1 93 which bound its cells together is dissolved also, that the cell-knots are loosened, and that certain organic molecules, or even the atoms which com- posed them, may be the only permanent units of consciousness which remain. We may take it for granted that the more the self-consciousness and the will are developed, the more permanent is the individuality. The in- dividuals of the human race have therefore the best chances of real (i.e. permanent) immortality. The development of the individual goes hand in hand with his training in altruistic activity. Both factors make for permanent survival. He is made strong, and he is made useful — strong to defend himself, useful in forwarding the interests of the com- munity. Permanent survival thus depends upon two factors, each of them of independent value, but both together forming an irresistible com- bination. If I would have my life-knot strong and secure, I must see to it that all the psychomeres which obey my will feel thoroughly at one, and firmly bound together in a common cause. " Union is strength." I must fill their lives with a common inspiration. They will strengthen me, and I, in turn, shall strengthen them. If, for any reason, I am personally unable to give them that firm government and vital inspiration which they need, I must get it from above, i.e. by N 194 THE WIDER PROBLEMS OF IMMORTALITY attaching myself closely to a larger organism, enter- ing its service with loyalty and glad devotion, and hand that loyalty and gladness down to them that serve me. I must be wise in my choice of that higher organism, that Master whom I will serve. He must be able to command my unswerving love and devotion. He must be strong, and His strength must be permanent too, and for the same reason, i.e. because it is in accordance with the greatest good. Thus I can safely defy the immeasurable eternities before me. Immortality thus presents itself to us in several new aspects. It is possible, though not inevitable. It is, so to speak, optional. The alternative to im- mortality is the disintegration of the individual, which is the only real death, and is not in any way connected with the laying aside of the ballast organism which is popularly known as death. The latter should, if anything, lead to a closer tying of the vital knot, a more vivid and energetic co-opera- tion between the psychomeres, and to that " sense of immense power " testified to by those who have been half-way across the gulf and returned. Nor can the possible amalgamation or fusion of two or more personalities be taken to imply the death of the individual. It should be, of all things, the moment of the most supreme rapture and ineffable bliss, a bliss of which we catch a faint glimpse in the transports of human love, and more especially in DISINTEGRATION 1 9 5 those exquisite refinements of love between the sexes which have been sung by poets of every age. Again, the disintegration of an individuality admits of several gradations. We have seen that there are infinite gradations of life-communities and planes of life-knots. The dissolving of a knot on one plane need not imply the dissolving of the knots immediately below it. Sometimes it certainly does not. Thus,' those infusoria which, after conjuga- tion, become cj^sts and give rise to numberless independent spores, show a disintegration of in- dividuality which but slightly lowers the plane of life, and does not hinder the re-attainment of the original level by the independent individuals. In the human body, after physical " death," the disintegra- tion is much more complex. The life-knots of the cells are dissolved, and also those of the biophores or " pangens " which build up the various contents of the cell. These are probably destroyed by the withdrawal of the controlling psychomeres. Disin- tegration remains latent so long as there is no active agent of destruction, and may remain undiscover- able when such agents are wanting (as under ex- treme cold). But under ordinary circumstances those useful scavengers, the bacteria, make short work of the outworn machine. They convert it into amines and amino-acids, which again give rise to ammonia. The latter is either absorbed by plants direct, or " nitrified " into nitrates, or " denitrified " 196 THE WIDER PROBLEMS OF IMMORTALITY into nitrogen. The nitrates are absorbed by plants, and the nitrogen is fixed in the soil by the nitrogen- fixing bacteria, so that it also becomes suitable for that most essential link between the animal and inorganic worlds, the plant. It is thus that nitrogen, that chemical species which of all species produces the most unstable and delicately poised compounds, circles the round of nature, descending into the " hell " of the infra-world before it again rises to the level of the animal. The view here adopted gives also a rational inter- pretation of blood-relationship as affecting life in the soul-world. It is just here that the incon- ceivabilities of the ordinary loose notions of survival become most glaring. Imagine a soul-world in which ancestors and grandsires and great-grand- children are indiscriminately herded together. If any earthly traditions remained among them there would be an intolerable tyranny of age over youth, tempered perhaps by a perennial and ever-increasing recalcitrance of the latter. There would not be, as with us, a reasonable progress tempered by a reason- able conservatism. On our view, on the other hand, there is a gradual ascent of man towards higher and higher levels, represented, not symbolically, but really, by higher strata of the atmosphere. It is like the smoke of incense ascending towards the Most High. A view such as this is opposed to what is known REINCARNATION 1 9 7 as metempsychosis or reincarnation, or the return of the soul to earth-life after a certain interval, and its passage through successive lives in the course of its gradual perfectioning. But our general experience of nature in such departments as those of natural history precludes us from pronouncing such a return as impossible, or even unlikely. Whenever we have a choice of two alternative processes, the safest conclusion to arrive at is that loth are true, and are sometimes chosen. For nature loves variety, not only of individuals, but of ways and means. Putting it grossly, we might call it a matter of statistics, and ask the question : What percentage of souls go through repeated incarnations on earth ? Reincarnation itself may take place in a variety of ways. There are well-authenticated cases of double or ' ' duplex " personality, in which the char- acter of a person suddenly changes, exactly as if the person's body were in possession of another entity. The former personality suddenly returns, and sometimes there is a more or less rapid alterna- tion of the two selves. 1 By careful treatment, the two personalities may even be amalgamated and fused into one. If we assume the " spiritistic " explanation, the invading spirit must obviously be taken as tempo- rarily incarnated, and as enjoying the powers con- 1 See Sidis and Goodhart, "Multiple Personality" (Appleton, London, 1905). 198 THE WIDER PROBLEMS OF IMMORTALITY ferred upon it by the possession of a physical organism. If that is possible, then such invasion is also conceivable in infancy or at the moment of birth, or even during gestation, in which case we should have to postulate the physical death or disembodiment, temporary or permanent, of the soul previously in possession of the organism in- vaded. This would appear to be rather a purpose- less procedure. And even if we go right back to the moment of conception, the difficulties by no means disappear. For although the presence of a crowd of souls desiring re-embodiment might explain not only the readiness with which new-comers are welcomed, but also the rapidity of their prenatal development, it fails when we take the most primitive type of birth, viz. simple fission. For when a cell divides into two equal parts, it would be absurd to suppose that one of them is henceforth to harbour an invading soul, while the other remains in possession of its original occupier. And as regards the problem of development, even if we explained it by the memories of previous in- carnations, which facilitate the formation of the well-remembered organs, the explanation would hardly cover the equally rapid formation of an organ by regeneration in an earth-worm or a lizard. Again, the doctrine of Karma (the accumulated record of character in the Indian philosophy) is already sufficiently contained in the formation of MASTER SPIRITS 1 99 the soul-body, which is much more lasting than the physical body, and bears with it the impress and record of all past actions and experiences. The question of immortality can hardly be dis- cussed without some reference to the higher com- manding entities which may possibly exist or be gradually evolved in the soul-world, and whose existence might conceivably produce some marked effect upon this earth-world. Even here there is an enormous difference between the power of the highest intellect and the power of the lowest. If there is anything certain in human development, it is that men are not born " free and equal." Their degree of freedom varies within very wide limits, and no two individuals are equally endowed except as regards, perhaps, their physical organism in its general outlines. Yet the desire for freedom and equality is not without its proper satisfaction. For, if anything is clear from the line of reasoning we have followed, it is that man has a certain definite freedom of choice within narrow limits imposed by the worlds next above and next below his own. Within those limits he is absolutely free, and his power is equal to that of any other entity, however much higher in the scale of being than himself. We have seen that each plane of being carries on its own type of life independently of all others, within the limits already referred to. The tree lives its own life, and the birds on its boughs live 200 THE WIDER PROBLEMS OF IMMORTALITY theirs. The supra-entity in whose blood our galactic system is a single corpuscle effects his mighty purpose independently of our puny will, and we in turn effect ours in utter indifference to his. That there are kingly souls in the soul-world, just as there are on earth, we must naturally expect. For aught we know, their ascendency may be more pronounced than any ascendency we find on earth. And if any large invasion of the earth-world is ever carried out from above, we may well assume it to be planned and carried out by some commander-in- chief of the soul- world. But such organised invasions would naturally be rare, and would become rarer as civilisation proceeded and as we obtained a firmer grip upon our own earth-conditions. This world of ours is " worth fighting for," as Cromwell said of Ireland. It is one of many worlds. It may not be the best of all possible worlds, but it is ours, and we are to blame for any lack of per- fection. It is our business so to order it that it may reach our highest conceivable ideal of perfec- tion. Since that task cannot be accomplished in a life-time, we must see that those who come after us have that ideal always before them, and have the strength to work towards it. The earth-world is lying there before us, ready to be moulded to our will. We are given powers of life and death over the animal and plant worlds. We can, and do, MANS SUPREMACY ON EARTH 201 alter the face of the land and the sweep of the coast. There is no limit to our mechanical powers, to our organisations, to the amount of matter, living or dead, which we may press into service. Surely such liberty brings with it tremendous responsibilities. And how can we put the blame on any shoulders but our own when anything is amiss ? If there is pain, is not the world full of anodynes ? If there is poverty, is there not untold wealth lying unclaimed ; is there not the delight of service which relieves distress ? If there is death, where is its terror ? For death is but the transition to a more subtle and intense life, in which again we have the choice between serving and governing, with its attendant alternatives of a light-hearted loyalty and sombre responsibility. Even if we are weary of life, and of all the struggle and the turmoil of it, we have the option of a surrender of our indivi- duality, of a sinking into the bosom of the All and One, of the merging of all that makes up our Selves in the ocean of life, where it will assume a myriad new forms, each guarding some echo and faint tradition of that Ego which once walked this earth through storm and stress. A fair world is ours now, and a fairer world awaits us beyond. Here on earth the flowers bloom for us, the trees wave their branches, the winds sigh, and the birds sing. A soul dwells in every tree, a mystic and dreamy soul, a soul half merged in that 202 THE WIDER PROBLEMS OF IMMORTALITY ocean of life whither many of us may tread our weary way as a last refuge some day. The green republic of the leaves lift up their faces towards the upper air and the sun, whence they have their sustenance and strength. The wide expanse of plain and mountain harbours endless forms of life, a thin film of existence emerging from the solid ground and merging imperceptibly into the ether above. In all this fulness of life the joy outweighs the sorrow, the progress surpasses the decay. Then whither have our terrors fled ? We find them neither in this world nor the next. In this world we have the comradeship of man to fight our battles with us and for us. In the next we have the comradeship of all mankind that went before us to prepare the way, and the same friends, perhaps, who welcomed us into this world will greet us on our transition thither. In all worlds present or to come, we have the sustaining power of the great Centre and Origin of all life, of God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, who never more will appear as an angry Judge, half repentant of having created us, but as the source of all life and all joy, the equally loving cherisher of all that lives and all that exists, in whom and through whom we are, and by whose strength and warrant we, too, have almighty powers. PART III CHAPTER I THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY The recent history of psychology has marked a gradual extension of the science into regions for- merly regarded as non-scientific, or as unworthy of the name of science. The old introspective school has been powerfully affected by the recent science of experimental psychology on the one hand and by mental pathology on the other. The psycho-physi- ological laboratory and the lunatic asylum have been the mines from which the richest treasures of psychological science have recently been obtained. The galvanometer and the chronograph have con- verted psychology to some extent into a quanti- tative science, and, on the other hand, the human mind, studied in its more abnormal and aberrant aspects, has revealed properties of which the older psychology was entirely unaware. The discredited art of " mesmerism " has been revived and codified, if not sanctified, under the new and more respectable name of " hypnotism " by Braid at Manchester and Charcot at the Paris Salpetriere, who conclusively 204 THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY established the extraordinary sway which one mind may obtain over the mind of another, and even over the body of another, down to its most elementary and essential organic functions. Hypnotism is now part of the regular curriculum of the medical pro- fession, and has almost completely disappeared from the popular stage. Its dangers are well recognised and guarded against, and its curative powers are being more and more extensively utilised. We may anticipate that the fate of hypnotism will be shared in the near future by many other " occult " realms of knowledge, such as animal " magnetism," telepathy, and spiritism. These comprise a large body of real or alleged observa- tions of a particularly obscure and difficult nature, which are not yet accepted by the bulk of repre- sentatives of official science, but are gradually being sifted and ranged in order, and will no doubt be the commonplaces of science by the middle of this century. In the present work we are moving necessarily so much on the borderland of the Known that it would be more than foolish to ignore these new facts simply because they do not yet form legiti- mate subjects for discussion, say, at the meetings of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Moreover, this book does not work under the limitations of a college text-book. It is not bound to give only that which is generally accepted. ROOM FOR NEW FACTS 205 It has to take its facts wherever it can find them, and the less " accepted " they are, the more light are they calculated to shed on the obscure problems hero dealt with — problems whose very obscurity shows how far official science is from furnishing a solution for them. There is also another consideration. The facts which have been sufficiently authenticated to be here utilised are, as a rule, not officially accepted, simply because they Jit into no accepted theory. If the facts are facts, the obvious conclusion is not that we must ignore them, but that we must alter our theories to suit them. Now the theory sketched out in what has been already written contains all the modifications necessary, not only to fit in the facts of the " new psychology," but also a host' of traditions of bygone times which have been dis- credited solely by being out of harmony with the prevailing trend of modern thought. Let us briefly resume the theory of the human individual developed in the preceding chapters : — 1. An individual is a permanent organisation consisting of an infinite number of living entities, graded in a " hierarchy " ranging from the most vital and essential to the least vital and least indispensable. 2. The most vital entities in this hierarchy are those which have the most powerful determining action upon the life processes. They are also 206 THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY those which are most permanently essential to the organisation. 3. At death, the most vital entities, down to a certain order of vitality, are detached from the body, which then falls a prey to other entities. The entities thus disembodied are here termed psychomeres or soul-particles. Together they make up the soul-body, or, in short, the soul. 4. The psychomeres are estimated to weigh not more than one-thousandth, nor less than one- millionth, of the total weight of the body. 5. Their disembodiment is undiscoverable by weighing the body in air, as their weight in air is zero. 6. The soul-body contains all the memories, organic and social, of the individual. It is more mobile and plastic than the physical body, and therefore capable of a more exalted and vivid type of existence. 7. The soul-body is probably held together by electrostatic forces. 8. The soul-body retains its power of assuming any shape desired, and may, under exceptional conditions, reconstruct for itself a physical body. 9. The abode of the departed souls is the earth's atmosphere. 10. The normal shape of the soul-body some- what resembles a flame, and is of about the same tenuity. A SUMMARY 207 11. The number of psychomeres constituting an individual may be roughly estimated at a trillion (10 18 ). 12. A certain proportion of the psychomeres are temporarily detachable from the physical body even during the life-time of the latter. 13. The psychomeres of a lost limb, &c, return to the organism of the individual on the death of the limb. 14. The birth of a new human being is due to the conjunction of two psychomeres derived from opposite sexes. These psychomeres are then lost to the parent individuals. 15. Death is necessitated by the overcharging of the psychomeres with permanent structures, formed for the purpose of simplifying life processes. 16. The immortality of the individual is not absolute, but depends upon the development of his individual consciousness and upon his utility to a superior organisation. Death in general does not tend to destroy the individual, but to enhance his individuality. 1 7. All individuals of any order are organisations of individuals of lower orders, down to the infini- tesimal. Individuals of all orders below the range of our analysis are regarded by us as " dead matter." 18. The laws of "matter" (the laws of Nature) are the aggregate of the social or organic laws of all individuals of orders below our range of analysis. 208 THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY 19. All individuals of whatever order are con- nected with the Universal Centre of Life, and are thus ultimately connected with each other. This scheme, which contains no very startling assumptions, accounts in a simple manner for the phenomena of both normal and abnormal psychology. It puts psychology on a sound logical basis, beyond the reach of destructive materialism. It abolishes the dualism of mind and matter, putting in its place what might be called a spiritual monism. It makes life the fundamental reality of the universe, and reduces physical death to a kind of " moult," a freeing of the individual from a worn-out piece of machinery built up by himself. It vitalises biology by reducing life processes to the known (viz. the phenomena of consciousness) instead of putting them back into the unknown recesses of atomic matter. Finally, it gives a reasonable working hypothesis of a future life, based upon well-known physical and physiological principles, which en- ables us not only to classify and explain a large number of hitherto isolated observations, but also to predict new ones capable of future veri- fication. We shall, in what follows, attempt to bring within our range the following abnormal or super- normal phenomena, variously classified as hypnotic, " magnetic," magic, subliminal, spiritualistic, mete- therial, mediumistic, or occult : — ABNORMAL PHENOMENA 209 a. The temporary withdrawal of the soul-body (" double," or " astral " body) during earth-life. b. The temporary duplication of parts of the body (cf. Davenport Brothers, Stainton Moses, Eusapia Paladino). c. Observations of withdrawal at or near death. d. Materialised spirit-forms. e. Luminous metapsychic phenomena. /. Mechanical phenomena of modern spiritualism (telekinesis). g. Phenomena of control and possession (auto- matism). h. Externalisation of sensation (telesthesia). i. Thought-transference (telepathy). j. Psychological exaltation (ecstasy, prophecy, genius). h. Retrocognition (" psychometry ") and haunting (apparitions). I. Hypnotism (animal "magnetism") and sugges- tion (psycho-therapeutics). These phenomena are classified in a different manner by Rector Boirac of Dijon. 1 He dis- tinguishes three orders of phenomena : — 1. Hypnoid. — Phenomena which are apparently explained by the forces already known, if we suppose that under certain conditions these forces act according to laws which we do not know yet, 1 See La Psychologie Inconnuc, par Emile Boirac. Felix Alcau : Paris, 1908. O 2IO THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY and which may be very different from the known laws. 2. Magnetoid.- — Phenomena apparently explicable by hitherto unknown forces or agents distinct from those which science has already discovered and studied, but which, we may add, belong normally to our world, and are comprised within that per- manent set of forces and agents which we call " nature." 3. Spiritoid. — Phenomena which seem to imply the intervention of forces which, though not indeed " supernatural," are extra-natural, not belonging normally to our world, but making in some way sudden incursions into the realms of nature from some plane of existence foreign to the plane in which we move. Boirac himself admits that this classification must be regarded as provisional only, and that there is a likelihood of class 3 being reduced to a special case of class 1 or class 2. We are not disposed to postulate any super- natural or even extra-natural forces. It is, in fact, unscientific to postulate these except as a last resort, when all other attempts at explanation fail. Besides, the term " force " has been greatly abused in this connection. It is a term belonging to physics, and means that which produces a dis- placement or acceleration of matter. It is not a satisfactory term. It is so vague and " meta- "FORCE 211 physical " that physicists have lately used it very sparingly, or have even attempted to discard it altogether. As a rule, one can distinguish a good work on physics from a bad one partly by the frequency with which the word " force " is used, and its use in books on psychology is often a sign of faulty reasoning or a loose terminology. To talk about the " conduction of magnetic force " is quite meaningless, and has no analogy anywhere in physics, and when we find the same force described as a " fluid," we reach the height of absurdity. Neither electricity nor magnetism are " forces." The former is, indeed, a fluid, and can be conducted. The latter is not a fluid, but a mode of motion of electricity, and can not be conducted. There is, of course, electrostatic force, and magnetic force, and electrodynamic force, but these can only be propa- gated across space (with the velocity of light), and cannot be conducted. Their nature is quite unknown ; and there is nothing to indicate any " fluidic " constitution for them. The forces governing biological processes are just as unknown as those which produce, say, the levi- tation of a table. Cohesion, chemical affinity, and the forces governing crystalline and colloid aggrega- tions are on the very borderland of physical science as far as their " explanation " is concerned. We can only state that such and such changes take place under suitable conditions. We have not got 212 THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY even so far as to explain why a stretched wire holds together. We cannot yet reduce its cohesion to known " forces," though there is every probability that cohesive force is electrostatic rather than mag- netic or gravitational. If that must be admitted concerning such a familiar thing as a copper wire, what shall we say about the much more mysterious forces of chemistry and biology ? We may guess that chemical affinities are matters of electrostatics, but if we remember that the very structure of electricity has only been elucidated within the last ten years, we shall understand that we are only arguing from the altogether unknown to the very imperfectly known. And as regards the form or structure of atoms, we can only indulge in the very wildest guess-work. They may be, for aught we know, living species of a very low order, whose birth-rate and death-rate are too rapid to enable us to perceive anything but an apparent uniformity and lifelessness. If two such highly developed sciences as physics and chemistry utterly forsake us in investigating the small-scale phenomena of matter, what must be said of biology, which has hitherto relied for all its ultimate explanations upon those very sciences, two broken reeds in the dismal swamp of the unknown ! Known Forces ! There are no such things. We know that certain effects as a rule are observable under certain conditions. What produces those SPECIAL HYPOTHESIS 213 effects ? Such and such forces. What are these forces ? They are that which produces such and such effects. We argue in a circle, and believe we are scientific. It is more legitimate to study, describe, and classify the effects, the uniformities observed in nature, to trace any observable analogies between physical and psychic occurrences, to deal as far as possible with simple facts and conditions, and to remain in the region of the known. Above all, we must refrain from " explaining " unusual phenomena with the help of highly speculative theories which happen to hold the field in any circumscribed science. The specialisation of modern research is such that every discipline has its own type of theory. The physicist deals in molecules or elec- trons, the chemist in atoms and stereochemical structures, the mineralogist in crystalline aggregates, solid or liquid, the physiologist in biogens and colloid substances, the astronomer in gravitating bodies. Those who can survey all these fields and unify them are few, and are becoming fewer. There is no inducement to generalise since the " specialist " holds the market. The wide sweep of a Newton is nowadays well-nigh impossible. It is safest, therefore, to take from every science its facts, and to look upon its theories as working hypotheses of very limited application. In psycho- logy it would be folly to reduce anything to matter 214 THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY and motion. Psychology must have its own funda- mental conceptions, its own units. And when we consider that psychology deals with more intimate and immediately knowable phenomena than any other science, it becomes evident that its reduction to physics or physiology is nothing but an abject and unworthy surrender. That mistake has not been committed by F. W. H. Myers, or by the other leaders and founders of the " new psychology." Myers, in his epoch-making work, 1 laid the foundation of a new psychological philosophy in which human faculties are presented to us in a wide perspective, ranging from the ordinary waking consciousness through the " subliminal " conscious- ness (the consciousness below the threshold) out to the universal or cosmic consciousness, the mind of the world-soul. In this scheme, ordinary waking (" supra-liminal ") memory comprises only a small fraction of the memory-tract really inherent in the individual. It is surrounded by regions of hypermnesia or exalted memory on one side, and by organic memory on the other, with a background of memories inherent in higher or lower orders of organisms. Sensation has similar annexes of hyperesthesia and telesthesia. Volition is flanked by self-suggestion and the 1 "The Human Personality, and its Survival of Bodily Death." Longmans, London. MYERS 2 I 5 superior control of matter, and ordinary foresight works on a background of subliminal or " instinc- tive " anticipations on the other hand, and sug- gestions and premonitions inflowing from the sea of life on the other. The past and future, im- perfectly surveyed by the individual, are clear and present to the world-soul, to which we are destined further and further to approximate. This magnificent scheme of human faculties is not based upon biological data, but upon the material accumulated by the Society for Psychical Research, and forms the most authoritative expo- sition and summary of the valuable data hitherto rendered available. The scheme as it stands repre- sents a minimum of new assumptions, and must be therefore described as possessing to an exceptional degree the scientific virtues of economy and con- tinuity. Our own scheme, while embodying that of Myers, will go a step farther. It will furnish a physical interpretation of the strata of consciousness. Instead of leaving them afloat in non-Euclidean space, it will locate them and bring them down to earth. Such a modification is, of course, exposed to the risk of refutation. It is more vulnerable than a purely psychological scheme. But that disadvant- age is amply compensated by the very living and graphic manner in which the various facts may be dealt with. Above all. it allows us to utilise the 2l6 THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY facts and laws of physics and physiology, so far as they have been determined. We can come down to figures, and estimate and predict. Thus we are in a position to test our theory in the only manner which is finally convincing. We have already had occasion to distinguish between the " organic " and the " social " memory. The latter may be identified with the supraliminal memory of Myers. The subliminal strata will then be composed of the organic memory on the one hand (including the racial memoiw), and those illuminated memories which, in occasional flashes, pervade the whole structure of the individual. Du Prel 1 regards the organism itself as the " thres- hold," and, in accordance with this nomenclature, Professor Barrett 2 uses the word '■ supra-liminal " to denote those supernormal faculties which we have referred to as only exercised in earth-life in occasional flashes. Such faculties comprise the hyperboulia, hypermnesia, and hyperesthesia of Myers. They are implied in our view of the organic connection of the individual with individuals of higher planes, and with the Universal Centre of Life. The subliminal self is probably paramount in the phenomena of suggestion and curative hypnotism, 1 "Philosophy of Mysticism," translated by C. C. Massey. Eedway, London, 1889. 2 " On the Threshold of a New World of Thought." Kegan Paul, London. 1908. THE SUBLIMINAL 2 17 in faith-healing, and in some forms of automatism. But in some directions the conception of the sub- liminal has been overworked. It has been made to do duty in many cases where it by no means offers the simplest explanation of the phenomena. That, of course, was natural so long as the old materialistic prejudice against human survival and the existence of extra-mundane intelligences re- mained in force. But now that we have arrived at a rational and intelligible view of death and survival, nothing would be gained by leaving out of consideration the manifold possibilities of dis- embodied intelligences acting upon our own world. We shall therefore be free to assume such action wherever it offers the " least resistance," and only if it does that. Our physical and quantitative data will enable us to discriminate in doubtful cases between the various probabilities, and if in any given case the " spirit hypothesis " is the simplest, we shall have no hesitation in applying it and working out its consequences. CHAPTER II THE STORY OF "KATIE KING" It will be useful at this stage to enter somewhat fully into the details of one of the most remarkable and best authenticated manifestations of super- normal activity on record. The story is thirty-four years old, but can be completely reconstructed from contemporary records, and its chief recorder, Sir William Crookes, F.R.S., is, happily, still alive, and ready, if necessary, to bear witness to its accuracy. It is the story of the frequent appearance of a materialised " spirit form " in various places in London, most usually in the presence of a " medium" of the name of Florence Cook, a girl of fourteen. The appearances took place from May 21, 1871, to May 21, 1874, a period of just three years. During the latter portion of this period the appear- ances were minutely studied by Mr. William Crookes, Mr. Cromwell Varley, F.R.S., Mr. S. C. Hall, Mr. J. C. Luxmoore, J. P., " Florence Marryat," Mr. W. H. Harrison, Editor of the Spiritualist, and other prominent people, who exhausted all their ingenuity in devising tests for the supernormal character of the phenomena. 218 FLORENCE COOK 219 Some details of a biographical nature are given concerning Miss Florence Cook in Light of December 15, 1894. She was at that time married to a Mr. Elgie Corner, and had several children. She died on April 22, 1904. We are told that her grandmother was given to seeing visions, and once lay in a trance which lasted for three weeks. Florence herself fell into occasional trances. Her first acquaintance with the physical phenomena of spiritualism was made during some table-tilting experiments with a school- fellow at Hackney, in which the table rose a clear four feet from the ground. At another sitting she was carried about on her chair by some abnormal means. Continuing the stances at home, she was instructed by raps to proceed to the house of Thomas Blyton, at Dalston, the secretary of a small group of spiritualists, through whom she was introduced to a number of people interested in the phenomena, which were at that time attracting considerable attention in London. Acting on their advice, she had regular sittings in her own family, the kitchen being curtained off to form a dark " cabinet " for her, while the family sat outside on the stairs. Under these circumstances she was " controlled " by an entity who called herself Katie King, and later on " Annie Morgan," and who en- deavoured to peep out through the curtain while Florence was lying in a trance inside. As no such 2 20 KATIE KING control took place when the medium sat in the light, the arrangements were improved by con- structing a wooden cabinet large enough to hold Florence seated on a chair, with a window near the top through which faces could be shown. These stances went on for some time, gradually developing in elaboration and the degree of illumi- nation, the form of Katie King eventually gaming sufficient power to emerge completely from the cabinet. After all precautions had been taken to prevent Miss Cook impersonating the figure, it remained to be shown that its appearance was not due to a collective hallucination of the company. This was done on May 7, 1873, by photographing the figure by magnesium light. The following is the full account of this achieve- ment, as published in the Spiritualist of May 15, 1873:— "PHOTOGRAPHING A SPIRIT BY THE MAGNESIUM LIGHT " A series of sittings has been held recently in the presence of responsible witnesses, to photograph the spirit ' Katie King,' who of late has been temporarily materialising herself so frequently through the non-professional mediumship of Miss Florence Cook. The efforts of the experimentalists have been successful, and the large engraving on PHOTOGRAPHIC TEST 22 1 the next page is about as faithful a copy as wood- cutting can give, of one of the photographs obtained on Wednesday night, last week. In the photo- graph itself the features are more detailed and beautiful, and there is an expression of dignity and etheriality in the face, which is not fully represented in the engraving, which, however, has been executed as nearly as possible with scientific accuracy, by an artist of great professional skill. " The following account of the principal stance, signed by all the witnesses, is rather more lengthy than the average of such documents, as it was thought that the extreme novelty and interest of the operations made it desirable that the particulars should be given somewhat in detail : — " We, the undersigned, have attended a series of four special stances recently held at the residence of Mr. Henry Cook, of Hackney, for the purpose of obtaining photographs of the materalised form of the spirit, ' Annie Morgan,' commonly known as Katie King, who manifests through the medium- ship of Miss Florence Cook. The most successful sitting was held on the evening of Wednesday, the 7th instant. " Katie can now manifest in full form by day- light ; but it being found that the ordinary light in the stance room (descriptions of which, and of the cabinet, have been given in former numbers of 2 22 KATIE KING the Spiritualist) was not well adapted for photo- graphic purposes, it was resolved by Mr. Harrison, who volunteered to do the photographing, to darken the room, and use the magnesium light. At the earlier stances Katie could only come out of the cabinet and bear the glare of the magnesium light for a few seconds at a time, once or twice during the sSance ; she had to go back quickly into the cabinet to gather fresh power from her medium, saying that the strong and unaccustomed brilliancy of the light made her ' melt quite away.' But gradually she became more and more used to it, and at the sSance now referred to, no less than four photographs were taken. It is from one of the best of these that the engraving is copied. " The cabinet doors were placed open, and shawls hung across, as on previous occasions already described. The sdancc commenced at six p.m., and lasted about two hours, with an interval of half- an-hour. The medium was entranced almost directly she was placed in the cabinet, and in a few minutes Katie stepped out into the room. The circle being most harmonious, conditions were ex- ceptionally good. The sitters, in addition to the undersigned, were Mrs. Cook and their two youngest children, whose delight at Katie's familiarity with them was most amusing. Katie was dressed in pure white, as previously described in the Spiritualist, except that her robe was cut low, with short sleeves, Portrait op "Katie King" Taken May 7, 1873, by magnesium light. Reproduced from a woodcut in the Spiritualist of May 15, 1873 GOOD CONDITIONS 223 allowing her beautiful neck and arms to be seen. Her head-dress was occasionally pushed back so as to allow her hair (which was brown) to be distinctly- visible. Her eyes were large and bright, of a dark blue or grey colour. Her countenance was animated and lifelike, her cheeks and lips ruddy and clear. Our expressions of pleasure at seeing her thus before us seemed to encourage her to redouble her efforts to give a good stance. By the light of a candle and a small lamp, during the intervals of photography, she stood or moved about, and chattered to us all, keeping up a lively conversation, in which she criticised the sitters, and the literary photographer and his arrangements very freely. By degrees she walked away from the cabinet and came boldly out into the room. A camera slide being overlooked, she walked up to a table where it was some distance away, and placed her hand on it. The door of the stance room was open all the while, in order that the plates might be taken out and developed in the adjoining kitchen. The window was opened several times to admit fresh air (and with it the twilight) after each ignition of the magnesium. The photo- grapher and some of the circle were occasionally moving about, but nothing seemed to interfere with the good conditions, or stop the manifestations in any way. Mr. Cook (who arrived late from the City) and the servant Mary, having called out from the kitchen that they would like to see what was 224 KATIE KING going on, Katie bade theni stand outside the door and look in, which they did nearly the whole of the stance. Katie usually leaned on the shoulder of Mr. Luxmoore, and stood up to be focussed several times ; on one occasion holding the hand lamp to illuminate her face. Once she looked at the sitters through that gentleman's eye-glass, patted his head and pulled his hair, allowed him and Mrs. Corner to pass their hands over her dress, in order that they might satisfy themselves that she wore only one robe. As one of the plates was taken out of the room for development, she ran a few feet out of the cabinet after Mr. Harrison, saying she wished to see it ; and on his return it was shown to her, he standing close to and touching her at this time. While he was absent, she walked up to the camera, and inspected ' that queer machine,' as she termed it. Just before one of the plates was taken, as Katie was reposing herself outside the cabinet, a long, sturdy, masculine right arm, bare to the shoulder, and moving its fingers, was thrust out of the opening at the top of the cabinet through which the faces are shown. Katie turned round and up- braided the intruder ; saying, that ' it was a shame for another spirit to interpose while she stood for her likeness,' and she bade him ' get out.' ToAvards the close of the seance, Katie said her power was going, and that she was ' really melting away this time.' The power being weak the admission of PRECAUTIONS 225 light into the cabinet seemed gradually to destroy the lower part of her figure, and she sank down until her neck touched the floor, the rest of her body having apparently vanished, her last words being that we must sing, and sit still for a few minutes, ' for it was a sad thing to have no legs to stand upon.' This was done, and Katie soon came out again entire as at first, and one more photo- graph was successfully taken. Katie then shook hands with Mr. Luxmoore, went inside her cabinet, and rapped for us to take the medium out. The only stipulation Katie made throughout was, that the sitters would not stare fixedly at her whilst she stood for her photograph. " The stance was given under stringent test con- ditions. Before commencing, Mrs. and Miss Corner took the medium to her bedroom, and having taken off her clothes, and thoroughly searched them, dressed her without a gown, but simply with a cloak of dark grey waterproof cloth over her under- clothing, and at once led her to the stance room, where her wrists were tied tightly together with tape. The knots were examined by the sitters respectively, and sealed with a signet ring. She was then seated in the cabinet, which had been previously examined. The tape was passed through a brass bracket in the floor, brought under the shawl, and tied securely to a chair outside the cabinet, so that the slightest movement on the p 2 26 KATIE KING part of the medium would have been at once detected. " During the interval of half-an-hour Mrs. Corner took charge of the medium whilst she was out of the cabinet, and did not lose sight of her for one minute. The tying and sealing were repeated before the second part of the stance, and on each occasion of the medium leaving the cabinet, the knots, and seals, and tape, were duly examined by all the sitters before the tape was cut, and were found intact. The medium was tied and sealed by Mr. Luxmoore, whose signet ring was used. " Amelia Corner, 3 St. Thomas's Square, Hackney. Caroline Corner, 3 St. Thomas's Square, Hackney. J. C. Luxmoore, 16 Gloucester Square, Hyde Park. G. P. Tapp, 18 Queen Margaret's Grove, Milclmay Park, London, N. William H. Harrison, Wilmin Villa, Chaucer Road, Heme Hill. " Mr. Luxmoore has favoured us with the following letter : — " To the Editor of the ' Spiritualist ' " Sir, — In the communication which you were good enough to publish on the 1st inst., I hinted that I was not without hope that in your next number I should be able to relate ' some additional MR. LUXMOORES ACCOUNT 227 facts which our opponents will find a little difficult to digest/ and I am happy to say that hope, in this instance, has not been blighted by disappointment. We have long had the wish to get a photograph of Katie, she having promised to do all in her power to assist us. On Monday, the 5 th inst., we had what Katie facetiously called ' a dress rehearsal,' for the purpose of photographing her while she was materialised. The difficulties attending the photo- graphic process were very great, but these you will, I am quite sure, explain much better than I can. I will only mention that we were entirely de- pendent on magnesium powder for light. On this first occasion the funnel through which the magnesium powder had to pass, had too small an orifice, and it was consequently choked. We ob- tained faint pictures, which, perhaps, were as much as we could expect on a first trial. " On Wednesday, the 7th, having gained much experience from the rehearsal, our efforts were rewarded by what I may venture to call a great success, as I think will be admitted by all who see the engraving which I hope you will be able to publish in the number of the 15 th instant. " The sitting was under strict test conditions. Miss Cook was, just before the seance commenced, taken into her bedroom and carefully searched by Mrs. and Miss Corner, in order to ascertain that she had 228 KATIE KING Fig. 2. nothing concealed about her, and from that time, to the final close of the photographing, she was not, for one minute, out of Mrs. Corner's sight, except while in the cabinet. Miss Cook's hands, A, Fig. 2, were firmly tied together with tape, which was then passed through a piece of brass, B, fixed with two screws to the floor (the heads of these screws, D D, were sealed so that no screw-driver could be used), and then, round my chair, beyond E. To make doubly sure, I tied the tape in a knot at B, before passing it out of the cabinet to my All knots, except the last (B), were sealed, that being unnecessary, as the tape was not severed at this point. To those who know how these stances are conducted, I need scarcely add that on this and all other occasions when tests are used, the seals are, when Miss Cook comes out of the cabinet, found to be quite perfect. The distance from her hands to the floor, when tied, was eighteen inches, so that it was absolutely impossible that she could stand upright, or, indeed, lift herself more than a very small distance from the low chair in which she sat. Katie stood perfectly erect, and is taller than Miss Cook — indeed, altogether, a much larger figure. She rested her elbow on my shoulder while some of the photographs were being taken. chair. --- MR. LUXMOORES ACCOUNT 229 This was done to insure her keeping quite still (no little difficulty for any one to do, when, suddenly, such a light as that produced by magnesium, is thrown on them). I, perhaps, should have stated that Katie was in her usual white robe, with a portion of her neck bare. If the above are not test conditions, I confess myself unable to say what would be considered satisfactory. This seance is certainly the best I have ever seen. Katie walked in full light some feet out of the cabinet, turned round, and allowed us to see her back. Her arms, hands, and feet were bare, and, certainly, no tape was to be seen. The tests were in accordance with Katie's strict orders. She refused to be photo- graphed unless her directions were obeyed ; and I must add that I think she was quite right, know- ing, as I do, the unfair (I might use stronger language) treatment mediums are subjected to. Evidence which would be deemed sufficient to prove anything else is often utterly ignored where Spiritualism is concerned. " On reperusal, I find I have omitted to state that I carefully examined every part of the cabinet while Miss Cook was being searched by Mrs. and Miss Corner. Nothing could possibly have been con- cealed there without my discovering it. I should also mention, that soon after one of the photographs had been taken, Katie pulled back the curtain, or rather rug, which hangs in front, and requested us 230 KATIE KING to look at her, when she appeared to have lost all her body. She had a most curious appearance ; she seemed to be resting on nothing but her neck, her head being close to the floor. Her white robe was under her. "J. C. LUXMOORE. " 16 Gloucester Square, " Hyde Park, W. " Mr. Luxmoore's tying and sealing is efficient and secure ; as a nautical man, who spends much of his time annually in his yacht, he knows how to tie knots. After tying Miss Cook's wrists together with tape, he seals the knots between the wrists, very close to the skin, with his signet ring. On Wed- nesday, May 7, the tape was sufficiently tight about the wrists to leave marks all round. " Mr. Harrison makes the following statement about the photographic operations : — " Many conditions had to be complied with to secure successful results. A harmonious circle was necessary, that the medium might be at ease, free from all care and anxiety, in order that the mani- festations should be given with the greater power. It was necessary that the medium should not sit too frequently, and have little to do at other times so as to reserve power and vital energy for the stances. In short, all the conditions which Spiritual- MR. HARRISONS ACCOUNT 23 I ists know to favour good manifestations were supplied as nearly as possible. " The cabinet being in one of the corners of a room in the basement of the house, the light is too weak, and not in the best direction for photographic purposes. For the same reason, that spirits can always handle old musical instruments better than new ones, and that the manifestations are usually stronger after a medium has lived for some time in the house, it was not desirable to make a new cabinet, the old one being well charged with those imponderable emanations from the medium, of which science at present knows nothing. It was, therefore, thought desirable to use the old cabinet, and to do the photographing by the magnesium light. " Magnesium ribbon Avill not ignite readily at a desired moment, and sometimes goes out unex- pectedly, so would be liable to cause many failures. As both materialised spirit forms and photographic plates, deteriorate rapidly after they are prepared in perfection, it was necessary to have a light which should not fail at a critical moment. "Accordingly magnesium powder mixed Avith sand was used, on the principle devised by Mr. Henry Larkins. A narrow deal board A B, Fig. 3, three feet long, was nailed to the base-board D E, and firmly held in a vertical position by the sup- port H. A Bunsen's burner, K N, to consume gas 232 KATIE KING mixed Avith common air, was fixed horizontally through the vertical board, and an india-rubber tube, D K, supplied the burner with common gas. The end of the funnel, W, was thus in the gas-flame F. When some mag- nesium powder and sand were poured into W they fell in a great stream, which caught fire at N, and burnt between N and B, in a great flame of dazzling brilliancy. The larger the proportion of magnesium in the powder, the B s Fig. 3. longer was the flame, and the best results were obtained with a flame averaging two feet in length, and lasting for five or six seconds. Sometimes the flame was so long as to scorch the base-board at B, and it set fire to it there once or twice. " As might be expected, there has been more success as yet in obtaining positives than negatives, as a shorter exposure will do for the former. The ordinary processes were used — namely, a thirty-five grain nitrate of silver bath, and proto-sulphate of iron development. Mawson's collodion. A half- plate camera and lens were used, with a stop rather less than an inch in diameter, between the front and back combinations of the lens. l< Materialised spirits always complain that the A Photograph of "Katie King" Taken in the presence of Dr. Gully ALLEGED EXPOSURE 233 gaze of observers pains thein, and so does a strong light ; this is one reason why we have so much of musical instruments playing under instead of over tables, at stances, and why direct spirit writing is rarely obtained under the direct gaze of observers. Consequently, after Katie had ' posed ' herself by ordinary light, she insisted that all the observers should turn their eyes from her during the few seconds the magnesium was burning." On May 12, four more positives Avere taken under similar circumstances. The question of the identity of Florence Cook and Katie King was repeatedly raised in the ensuing newspaper controversies, and was put to a somewhat extraordinary test on December 9, 1873, at Mr. Cook's house. A Mr. Volckman grasped the appari- tion round the waist and tried to throw her down with his feet. " Katie " extricated herself and went back to the cabinet, and Volckman was seized and ejected. The occurrence, which has since often been repeated on similar occasions, threw grave doubts on the bona fides of the medium, in spite of the precautions of tying, &c. A few days after- wards, Miss Cook requested Mr. William Crookes to examine the phenomena under more strictly scientific conditions. An elaborate investigation was then undertaken by Crookes, which extended over five months, and which completely established 2 34 KATIE KING the separate identity of the medium and the materialised form. One method of doing this was an electrical one, described by Mr. Varley as follows : l — "ELECTRICAL EXPERIMENTS WITH MISS COOK WHEN ENTRANCED. "By Cromwell F. Varley, F.R.S. " The experiments in question were made at the house of Mr. J. C. Luxmoore, J.P., 16 Gloucester Square, Hyde Park, W. The back drawing-room was separated from the front by a thick curtain, to exclude the light of the front room from the back room, which was used as a dark cabinet. The doors of the dark room were locked, and the room searched before the sdance began. The front room was illu- minated by a shaded paraffin lamp turned low. The galvanometer used in the experiment was placed on the mantelpiece ten or eleven feet from the curtains. The following observers were present : Mr. Luxmoore, Mr. William Crookes, F.R.S. , Mrs. Crookes, Mrs. Cook, Mr. G. R. Tapp, Mr. Harrison, and myself. Mr. Crookes sat close to the curtain on one side, and Mr. Luxmoore on the other. "Miss Cook was placed in an arm-chair, in the room which was subsequently to serve as a darkened cabinet. Two sovereigns, to which platinum wires 1 The Spiritualist, March 20, 1874. THE ELECTRICAL TEST 235 had been soldered, were attached one to each of her arms a little above her wrists, by means of elastic rings. Between the sovereigns and the skin three layers of thick white blotting paper, moistened with solution of nitrate of ammonia, were placed. The platinum wires were attached to her arms, and led up to her shoulders, so as to allow of the free movement of her limbs. To each platinum wire was attached a thin cotton-covered copper wire, which led into the light room, where the sitters were to be located. Thick curtains separated the two rooms, so as to leave Miss Cook in the dark when the curtains were down. " The conducting wires were connected with the two cells of a Daniell's battery, and a regular cable- testing apparatus. When all was ready the back room was darkened, the current passing through the body of the medium the whole evening.