Class _P/£l2^^ Book^IlJ\ COPVRIGHT DEPOSrr. ^■^ije aicatiema Scitrs of lEiigltst) Classtrs THE DE COVERLEY PAPERS FROM THE SPECTATOR EDITED BY SAMUEL TPIURBER ISoston ALLYN AND BACON I w ^ COPYRIGHT, 1S98, BY SAMUEL THURBER. 2n jV^O COPIES RiCtlVED- Xavtoooti i3vrs3 J. S. Cushiiip; & Co. — Berwick & Smith Norwood Mass. U.S.A.-^ CONTENTS. Introduction . . . . 1. The Spectator introduces Himself. No. 1 . 2. The Spectator Club. No. 2 . 3. Wit versus Manners. No. 6 . . . 4. The Spectator's Policy Discussed. No. 34 . 5. A Fashionable Lady's Library. No. 37 6. The Spectator at Sir Roger's. No. 106 . 7. Sir Roger and his Dependants. No. 107 . 8. Will Wimble. No. 108 . 9. The Coverley Portrait Gallery. No. 109 . 10. Haunted Houses. No. 110 11. The Immortality of the Soul. No. Ill . 12. Sunday in the Country. No. 112 13. Sir Roger in Love. No. 113 . . . 14. Tlie Importance of Economy. No. 114 15. Hunting as an Exercise. No. 115 16. The Spectator in the Hunting-field. No. 116 17. Moll White, the Witch. No. 117 . 18. How Confidants prevent the Making of Matches No. 118 19. Town and Country Manners. No. 119 PAGE v 1 6 12 16 20 25 29 32 36 40 45 48 52 57 61 65 71 75 79 IV Contents. 20. The Moralist in the Poultry-yard. No. 120 21. The Moralist in the Poultry-yard — {continued) No. 121 .... 22. Sir Roger at the Assizes. No. 122 23. Florio and Leonilla. No. 123 . 24. Party-spirit. No. 125 ^ 25. Party-spirit — {co7itinued). No. 126 X26. Sir Roger and the Gypsies. No. 130 . ^^ ^(^ 27. The Spectator decides to return to London. No 131 .... The Captain finds his Match in the Quaker. No 132 ... . Sir Andrew combats Sir Roger's Prejudices. No The Cries of London. No. 251 28. X9. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. Notes / Sir Roger in Westminster Abbey. No. 329 A Study of Beards. No. 331 . Sir Roger at the Theatre. No. 335 . AVill Honeycomb's Adventures. No. 359 Sir Roger at Vauxhall Gardens. No. 383 The Death of Sir Roger. ^No. 517 . PAGE 83 88 93 97 102 107 111 115 118 122 127 132 136 140 143 147 151 154 159 INTRODUCTION. The character of Sir Roger de Coverley is portrayed in less than forty papers of the Spectator, occupying in this volume barely a hundred and fifty pages of type, which may be read in an evening of pleasurable leisure. It is impossible to make a painful task of this reading. Writ- ten by Steele and Addison for the delectation of their con- temporaries, the Spectator continues, after the lapse of nearly two hundred years, to delight all people of taste; and the most pleasing portion of these 635 very miscel- laneous papers is that small group devoted to Sir Eoger. Excepting the critical papers on Paradise Lost, no consider- able number of others can be found having sufficient unity of theme to justify a grouping under a common rubric. Nor do the Sir Roger papers from the Spectator have much internal organic unity of development. They__give us but little story ; there is absolutely no plot ; they stand in no necessary sequence, and except that allusions would here and there become thereby unintelligible, even their order might be changed with impunity. These papers make, however, a very distinct impression, and leave us in no confusion as to the characteristics of the man whom the writers had in their imagination conceived. This distinctness of outline depends on an inner unity of vi Introduction. fidelity to an ideal consistently thought out and nobly planned. The writers did not add piece after piece to their work at random. When they came to Sir Roger, they knew the man they had to describe. In short, we have in this selection a very happy, though slight, attempt at character painting. Were there only a plot, and com- plicated relations with other characters equally well drawn, Addison and Steele would have given us a novel before the days of Fielding. We have, however, only the picture of Sir Roger. All other draughts of character are inchoate, sometimes sug- gesting possibilities, but never carrying possibilities to realization. The Spectator remains a miscellany of bright, humorous Avriting on subjects oftenest commonplace, though some- times rising to a noble religious fervor. The authors an- nounced it as their endeavor '^ to cultivate and polish human life, by promoting virtue and knowledge, and by recom- mending whatever may be either useful or ornamental to society." In this announcement of ^ourpose there is no cant. Both the writers of the Spectator were sincere men, and in their work they make good all their professions. Neither Addison nor Steele was still to learn what the public would take with avidity ; nor was either of them still to learn where his own strength lay. Only two months before the first number of the Spectator appeared, Steele had brought to an end his Tatler, after a career of 271 numbers. In this enterprise, from the twentieth num- ber on, Steele had had the occasional assistance of Addison. In his Tatler Steele had felt his way to the form of writ- ing which he could best manage, and which the conditions of the time most clearly solicited. The essay on a moral or social theme, as we know it in the Spectator, was only Introduction. vii one of several features wMcli were embraced in his original conception. For one thing, he included in his scheme, at the outset, a department of news. For telling the political news he had special facilities, for he held the office of '^ gazetteer," or editor of the London Gazette, then, as now, the official organ of the government for the publication of important state transactions. The gazetteership was a pub- lic office, depending for its retention on the continued favor of the party in power. The English civil service was at that time as corrupt as was that of the United States before the reformers began their work. Politics changed, Steele's enemies came into power, and Steele lost his office. Hence- forward he could give the Tatler no special distinction by publishing news. But in the light, witty, satirical essay, touching upon social foibles, Steele had, during his editor- ship of the Tatler, found himself very much at home. In this field he was unrivalled, except by the man who, join- ing the enterprise as a loyal coadjutor, helped him to the achievement of a fame far greater than he could have attained alone. The Tatler, therefore, before Steele brought it to an end in the beginning of 1711, had become such a paper that the Spectator followed it natur- ally, and without essential change of plan. Not only had Steele sounded the public taste and found the bent of his own genius ; he had secured a partner of greater literary skill than himself. Very generously he recognizes the primacy of Addison in their joint enterprise. "I have," says he, "only one gentleman, who will be name- less, to thank for any frequent assistance to me, which in- deed it would have been barbarous in him to have denied to one with whom he has lived in an intimacy from childhood, considering the great ease with which he is able to dispatch the most entertaining pieces of this nature. This good office viii Introduction. he performed witli such force of genius, humor, wit, and learning, that I fared like a distressed prince, who calls in a powerful neighbor to his aid ; I was undone by my auxiliary ) when I had once called him in, I could not subsist without dependence on him." Thus does Steele speak in closing the Tatler. How the two writers apportioned their Avork cannot now be known. No system or plan of dividing the responsibility is perceptible. Probably there was none. The truth would seem to be that Steele was known as the responsible editor, on whom devolved the ultimate care of providing copy, while the position of Addison was that of a generous con- tributor, whose aid was so abundant that the editorial func- tion, though by no means a sinecure or a secondary affair, was always relieved from anxiety. AVe can hardly conceive Steele as rejecting or correcting anything from Addison. Almost as little likely is it that Addison ever complained of Steele. If the men worked in nnbroken harmony, this happy union will have to be ascribed chiefly to the large heart and good nature of Steele, and in an inferior degree to the courte^^ and high breeding of Addison. Both were lovable men; but Steele was the more capable of for- bearance, the readier to pardon, the less liable to give offence. The methods employed by Addison and Steele to render their essays an effective agency for the moral improvement of society should be carefully noted. It was plainly an absolute necessity, if the essays were to be widely read, that they should be interesting. The public of that day had its own peculiar tastes, largely inherited from the time of the Restoration. These tastes were vicious, and Avere in fact precisely the thing that was to be corrected. To sermons and pamphlets the public was quite too thoroughly used. Introduction. ix These instrumentalities had exhausted their efficacy as means of reaching the polite, pleasure-loving classes. Some- thing very unlike a sermon, very unlike a partisan pamphlet, was evidently called for by the situation. Here were possi- ble readers in plenty, ready to laugh with a humorist or a wit, — prepared to relish satire directed against even their own foibles and extravagances, provided only the satire was amusing. The writer who purposed to get a hearing in this class must obviously meet it half way. He must not seem too serious, too lofty in his professions. Only in dealing directly with religion and religious institutions could he be pardoned for assuming the solemn tone. He must be per- petually in good humor, always urbane, never above the level of his readers. Hence he must avoid squeamishness in language, speak in the usual manner of his time, and use the freedom and breadth of illustration that everybody ex- pected. In short, he must make his essays light, joyous, provoking; and while the moral was always present, and plainly deducible, its reception must be provided for by bringing readers into a pleased and receptive mood. Earnest whigs as Addison and Steele notp.bly were, they saw that their paper would utterly miss its aim if it became known as a partisan enterprise. Its attitude towards politics is the attitude of a censor, not of any political doctrine, but of all political bitterness of feeling. Even the most sple- netic tories loved Addison, and welcomed the Spectator without misgiving. Then the writers of the Spectator understood perfectly that their paper could not dispense with the favor of women. They meant it should go into homes, there be read aloud and laughed over, assured that what was talked about at the tea-table would make an impression on minds and win regard. X Introduction, Thus it comes to pass that the Spectator is a collection of essays i^revailingiy light and . merry, but often becoming nobly serious and directly didactic. TheijL,.clli^|_literary characteristic is their humor, which still gives them distinc- tion, and makes them eminently readable. This humor is fine and subtle ; rarely, at least in the hands of Addison, broad or too obvious. Young readers are apt to miss, now and then, the point of Addison's humor. The style, both of Addison and Steele, is wonderfully free and rapid, suggesting ease of composition, as was in- deed befitting in a paper published every day. In reading the English of the Spectator, you are borne on through a simple and lucid syntax that asks no more mental effort than does the conversation of cultivated men and women. Their themes being generally commonplace, these essayists do not task the attention or the understanding. Above all things, they desired to be read by a great multitude of cultivated persons ; and to be read rather as the occupa- tion of leisure than as material for criticism. Caring not to attain, either in their grammar or in their rhetoric, a cor- rectness which their contemporaries would not have appre- ciated, they proceeded directly, and without artifices of speech, to the happiest possible expression of whatever they had to communicate. The essays which are concerned with Sir Eoger de Cover- ley as their main theme, are barely twenty in number. The greater part of these were written during that memorable July, — the fifth month of the Spectator's existence, — which the mysterious personage whom we call Mr. Spec- tator, and who figures as the author of all the papers, is represented as having passed at Sir Roger's country-seat in Worcestershire. For the purposes of the rest Sir Roger Introduction, * xi is brought to town. But besides the papers devoted to Sir Eoger de Coverley as their main theme, many others make allusions to him and his humors in one way or another, and furnish more or less occasion for inclusion in a Sir Eoger series. It is not easy to draw the line. This collection presents thirty-seven papers, in all of which the Knight is at least mentioned; but many more might have been found having equal claim with these for admission under the de Coverley title. But these thirty -seven papers seemed to be enough for the purposes of the book, and it was neces- sary to stop somewhere at last, however appropriate and abundant the matter that might have been added. In accordance with the taste of their time, the authors of the Spectator introduced each paper with a motto quoted from a Greek or Latin writer. These mottoes they did not translate. The use of them was merely conventional, indi- cating, on the part of the essayists, a profession of culture, or, as they called it in those days, of learning ; just as cer- tain articles of apparel have always, in English society, been deemed the peculiar and necessary note of the gen- tleman. The Spectator's mottoes seldom add any real piquancy to the essays. In the editions published since the earliest ones it has become customary to append trans- lations to the Latin and Greek quotations. In this volume such translations will be found in the notes. Of the thirty-seven papers in this selection twenty-five are by Addison, nine by Steele, and three by Budgell. The last named writer gets his entire distinction in English literature from the fact tliat, under the patronage, and perhaps with the help, of Addison, he Avas allowed to con- tribute to the Spectator about one-seventeenth of all the numbers. His papers bear a general resemblance in style to those of Addison. xii Introduction. While working at this selection from the papers of the Spectator, the class will have frequent occasion to consult the writers' complete works. A complete Addison and a complete Spectator and Tatler should lie on the table for easy reference during the time devoted to this period of literature. Two editions of Addison's works are accessible, — that of Bishop Hurd, enlarged by Henry G. Bohn, pub- lished in six volumes, in the Bohn Standard Library, by Macmillan & Co., and the edition, also in six volumes, of Professor George Washington Greene, published by J. B. Lippincott & Co. The Spectator can be had in numerous shapes. Chiefly to be recommended is the edition in eight volumes, edited by G. Gregory Smith, and now publishing by Charles Scribner's Sons. Good also is the edition of Professor Henry Morley in three volumes, published by Eoutledge & Sons. The Spectator, Tatler, and Guardian are included in the series of British Essayists, edited by A. Chalmers. Books and articles, bearing directly on Addison and Steele and their writings, will be found in endless profu- sion. Macaulay's essay on Addison is perhaps to be named first. The Life of Addison by Miss Aikin, Avhich Macaulay criticises, is republished in this country, and may easily be looked up in the libraries. Still more accessible is Mr. Courthope's Addison, in the English Men of Letters series. In 1889 appeared the Life of K-ichard Steele by George A. Aitken. This handsome book, in two octavo volumes, will be found valuable for reference. It contains interesting portraits. Much smaller is Austin Dobson's Steele in the English Worthies series. A book not yet quite superseded by all the literary researches of three generations is Nathan Drake's Essays, biographical, critical, and historical, illustra- tive of the Tatler, Spectator, and Guardian, London, 1805. Introduction. xiii The book entitled Addisoniana, published in two small vol- umes in 1803, will be found worth looking up. It contains a curious portrait of " Mr. Addison at Button's." With a little enterprise pupils will hunt up many portraits of Addison and Steele. A school girl succeeded in getting a portrait of the Countess of Warwick, the lady whom Addi- son married. On the manners and customs of the eighteenth century, the student will find useful and interesting, either for casual consultation or for continuous reading, England and the Eng- lish in the Eighteenth Century, by William Connor Sydney, Macmillan & Co., 1891. Still more interesting, by reason of its numerous illustrations, is Social Life in the Reign of Queen Anne, by John Ashton, Chatto & Windus, 1882. On the general history of Addison's times the reader will naturally refer to Macaulay's History, so far as this ex- tends, and should learn to refer to the index to the Essays even for eighteenth century matters not reached by the His- tory. Charles Knight's Popular History of England is a book that every high school should possess. Its pictures and its frequent reference to social and literary matters make it a work of supreme interest to youth. A most ex- cellent book, both for reading and for handy reference on all topics of English history, is Samuel Rawson Gardiner's Student's History of England. Every high school should have this work. Of all thinkable books of reference, perhaps the most important to the student, either of history or of literature, is the Dictionary of National Biography, still publishing, and now (May, 1898) so far advanced in the alphabet as to include Steele. Fortunate the school that possesses this work. It presents the lives of writers on just the scale required by the general student. This scale is large enough xiv Introduction. to make the book most interesting to read as well as to consult. Merely verbal difficulties in texts no older than the Spec- tator are usually explained by the larger dictionaries. When all the common dictionaries fail, then the Century should be tried. When the Century fails, then you must go to the New English Dictionary of Dr. Murra}^, if this has ad- vanced far enough to meet your case. At present the letters A-F are completed, and a good beginning is made on G and H. S. T. , May, 1898. THE SIR ROGER DE COVERLEY PAPERS FROM THE SPECTATOR. :>>9