228 5 py 1 - [51 THE CITY MIND A PLEA FOR A MUNICIPAL UNIVERSITY ...By--- Rev. Dr. Abram Simon. - - - Before - - - "ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE BUCHTEL COLLEGE", AKRON, OHIO, JUNE 18, 1913. WASHINGTON, D. C. THE CITY MIND A PLEA FOR A MUNICIPAL UNIVERSITY. W e have come to take counsel concerning the Next Step Forward in civic and educational progress. I am to consider with you some reasons which not only justify such a step but also render it logically and civically imperative. In order to correlate the mental attitude of the city as a unit with the responsibilities of each individual therein. I shall find it convenient to present mv proposition under the title "The City Mind." The mere title suggests at once that we have entered upon an era of municipal psychology. It is not the psychology of a mob or of a mere organism. It is the psychology of a conscious and a purposeful organization, functioning towards an intelligent destiny. The City Mind is the rational and righteous response of a community to its increasing and progressive needs. It implies a training of its citizens to think and act in terms of city welfare. It expects its citizens to be "city-wise." It presupposes that the people have a city sense. This city-conscious- ness is not narrowed by geographical limits ; it is not inimical to the wider interests of State and Federal obligations. The city is, after all, the nation's grammar school for the study of patriotism. The city's highest task is to make citizenship ethical and dynamic. Our query, then, is. "xA.re we wholly satisfied with the manifesta- tions and activities of the City-Mind? Are we wholly satisfied with the civic training of out youth? Is the corporate conscience depend- able? Have we fully educated our people to think and to act in terms of city-welfare?" Idle flattery lulls us often into the belief that we have solved the problem of the city. Even a casual glance at the daily press soon dispels any illusion on which we may have cushioned our slumbering con- science. Nor will we spend any time now in analyzing this anomalous condition of inefticiency. Having set before ourselves a specific prob- lem, we shall not permit ourselves to be drawn from its main road by the allurements of its inviting side-paths. W'e believe that, in a Republic of such lavish opportunities, there is no excuse for any in- ferior thinking or disloyal conduct. The greater the Democracy the higher is the demand it makes on personal and civic righteousness. "Noblesse Oblige" has especial application in a Republic like ours which, while it levels upward, gives a new interpretation to nobility and ob- ligation. The era of cities is upon us. Within the lifetime of all of us America has come to enfold a thousand miniature republics in one. We dare not stop to consider the multiplex causes which are responsible for the unprecedented increase in the number and size of our cities. America is rushing headlong into cities, much to the disadvantage of the rural population. But like it or not, the tendency city-ward can- not be checked. The city-problem has thus grown embarrassingly complex. Every city is a cross-section, as it were, of the heart of the Ma- tion. Here the pulse-beats of democratic life can be counted with Gift Author exactness; here a diagnosis can be made, and a piognosis divined. The civic physician insists that a nation is sound in pi ©portion to the virihty of its municipahties. Because a city is the intensest unit of self-govern- ment, it becomes the thermometer of pohtical heahh. Here vice and virtue have their playgrounds. School and brothel elbow each other. Disease-festering alleys intersect sunstreamed avenues. Upward pull- ing forces are in a tug of war with downward dragging forces. Here the Upas tree of greed and graft spreads its hideous foliage beside the Liberty Tree of loyalty, courage and patriotism. Here is the man who lives for his country, shouldering the man who lives off his country. Here is the vast population of swarming youth, pouring from shop and store. Are they to add to the lawless, the criminal, the inefficient population ; or are they to be successfully trained to self-mastery and civic righteousness ? What vast crude material ! What conditions of shame ! What opportunities for constructive labor, social uplift, civic transformation! Evidently, then, the City-Mind is not at its best. Evidently, then, the City-Mind needs a school antl a schooling adequate to its increasing dignity ! What constitutes the form and activity of this civic mind? Is it merely its fine sweep of carpeted knolls, or ample boulevards or border- ing rivers? Is it merely its busy life of shop and factory, of store and bank, its rush of cars and stream of vehicles, its overhead wires throb- bing with elsctric messages of hope or fear? Is it merely its stately institutions of justice, its homes of mercy, its gracious parks, its public press, museums, libraries, towering churches, and beneficent hospitals? Is it merely its material evidences of civic life, of police and fire pro- tection, of health and food vigilance? Or is it rather the men and women who are behind these multiform activities, whose civic pride and public spirit are in constant evidence, whose unselfish devotion to the public weal and zeal for righteousness are making their city a joy to live in? Is not community living the highest of the arts of peace? Is it not true that a sensitive, civic conscience is the greatest asset of any city? The motive force making for such a civic appreciation is public education. Our Democracy has set its greatest store by the education of its youth. I believe that the Public School has made good, and I also believe that it can do better. The tremendous industrial up- heaval in our land is not calling for a new public school system but for a new view-point. Public education must open its tvindotvs upon Life. It must train essentially for American life and American citi- zenship. The nation calls upon each city to strengthen its school system for the ethical and patriotic cultivation of the City Mind. Compulsory education and The Child Labor Movement will yet find the entire boyhood and girlhood of the nation at school. It is instructive to note that of the 4,11LS45 children who entered the first grade of the elementary schools in 1902, only 25 per cent or 972,011 were in the Eighth Grade in 1909. What has become of this remain- ing 75 per cent who dropped out in the intervening seven years? As we proceed in our educational system we reach the surprising fact that of this 25 per cent only 502,577 enrolled in the first year High School. This means that 12.5 per cent of the number enrolled in the first grade in 1902 entered the first year of the High School in 1910. Of these High School beginners approximately 39 per cent will graduate in 1914. We see at once what an alarming number of our children does not or can not get the advanti'ges of a High School training! H the great majority are compelled to join the earning classes, every city in a Democracy ought to create additional opportunities at night for those who crave to seize them. If the voluntary sacrifice of continued education is rather due to the luiinterestingness of the curriculum, another serious task is thrown upon the educational au- thorities of a city. These hundreds of thousands thus thrown into the vortex of our whirling life can scarcely be expected to hold their equi- librium. Can these be expected to contribute much to the development of the Civic Mind? Proceeding a step further we mount the next highest rung of our educational ladder. How many of the High School graduates will enter the college, professional or normal school '' The National Bu- reau of Education believes that fifty per cent will avail themselves of College opportunities. Where will these students go for their studies, what will be the average cost per year to them, and what will they give in turn to the cities whence they come, are very vital and perti- nent questions. As a rule, each city of average size provides fairly well for the grammar and high school courses. And right here its educational program comes to an inglorious halt. Why does a city or why should a city permit such a break in its sehenie of training its children to an appreciation of their duties as citizens? Why should not the surest and broadest foundations of a liberal and technical edu- cation be laid, upon which the youth may build a moral and civic struc- ture of greatest service to himself and the State? Why should a municipality feel its duty complete when it turns its youth out into the world at the age of eighteen either to earn a livelihood at home or to seek higher education elsewhere? To be sure, the answer will come that such a continuous system of education is too expensive and that a University education is, after all, a personal problem. Is this not a narrow and an uncivic standpoint ? If there is a City-Mind will it not make its readiest appeal at the same time when the individual mind is just awaking to the largeness of life and beginning to view the city as the field of its operation and livelihood? I am not blind to the advantages which may accrue to some students when thrown upon their own resources away from home. I am not blind to the fine and inspiring traditions which hang around some Universities and attract the eager youth thither. Nor am I blind to the increasing cost of building, equipping and maintaining with becom- ing financial and cultural dignity an up-to-date University. Objec- tions one and two are not weighty enough to halt us, while objection three can be left cheerfully to the civic earnestness of each community which, when the need arises, can levy the necessary tax without ignor- ing the generosity and public spirit of its citizenship in such a crisis. The Universities will go henceforth where the people and the pupils are to be found. The people and the pupils are now in the cities. Herein lies our weakness. Hundreds of students are compelled to seek their College training away from home. They leave their cities at their most impressionable age of budding civic consciousness. The city loses touch with the students whom it has fostered ten or twelve years. Absence from it for the next four College years dulls the edge of city-appreciation. While the city is recalled for some^ senti- mental reason, its civic possibility and duty do not loom large in the imagination and aiTection of the student. Absence does not make the civic heart grow fonder. The problems of his city do not constitute his probhms. These students have lost in civic pride. From the years of eighteen to twenty-two the civic appetite has not been whetted. What would have been gained had opportunities for higher education been opened up in their home town? Let us not sneer at the financial advantages. With the increasing cost of living, the expense of Uni- versity education is growing at an equally rapid pace. It is fair to ^ay that the cost of a University training away from home is practically twice as great as it would have been at home. Besides, the money spent at home for sucl an education would remain in the local coffers. It is fair to say that tho cost for one year, including tuition, other fees, room and board and a few moderate pleasures would run from $500 to $1,000 at any first-class College. The figures of the Cincinnati Uni- versity, however, reveal a constantly diminishing cost per student as the number of students increases. The annual cost to the municipality of Cincinnati for one student was in 19]! about $103. This school, then, of almost two thousand students has saved several hundred thousand dollars in the course of four years' training. The Cincinnatian. paying no tuition fee, living at home and spared many of the additional in- . ducements and temptations, finds that his personal expenses for nine school months in a year have been practically cut in half. If it be alleged' that the cost elsewhere is materially lessened by the opportunities of self-help afforded students in the great Universities, it but presents additional argimient to the increasing advantages of self- help which your own city-university may offer you. Here, again, the Cincinnati University's testimony is eloquent. Through its magnificent scheme of co-operation with the municipality's activities, channels of self support become part of their educational endeavors. But aside from this, 59 per cent of all the students work during the year, v/hile (57 per cent of the male students work during the vacation. Recent figures indicate that the percentage of students who have followed gainful occupations before coming to the college is 85.5. The outstanding fact is that 74 per cent of all the male students are working regularly dur- ing the year for part of their time, including the co-operative students, whose work is a part of their course. This question of self-help opens up the latest issues of vocational training. Shining shoes, barbering. waiting on the table and similar kinds of unskilled labor by which students work their way through college are not calculated to reveal to them the wider avenues of voca- tional service. Again, vocational training does not belong to pupils of the elementary grades. Even boys and girls in the high schools scarcely know what line of activity will be congenial to tliem. But a University in a city is peculiarly and favorably conditioned to enter into such relationship with the activities of a city as to invite careers of usefulness to earnest students. In as much as you have enjoyed the presence and advice of Dr. Charles William Dabney you have learnt from him of the numerous points of contact between the five Colleges composing the Cincinnati University and the various branches of the municipality's quickening life. Dr. Dabney has made the "co- operation method"' so practical that it has been adopted by other Uni- versities. A^ocational I'raining is the natural outgrowth of this co- operative scheme. Each of the five colleges holds intimate relation with the Board of Health and its problems of meat, milk, water, sani- tation and 'quarantine, with street, park and alley improvements, with school teachers and children, with slum, poverty, crime and social set- tlements, with factory and shop. Theoretical teaching goes hand in hand with practical training. A student is earning and learning at the same time. But what is infinitely more, he is learning to know his city, its dark and its bright spots, its ])olitical graft and glory, its daily activities and its hourly needs. It is this close familiarity with his city during his College days which develops civic pride and civic honor. Thus, while the city serves the University, the University serves the City. The home-trained University student finds his city growing up under his own eyes. He is best prepared to give it loyal service. Our statements have not taken into consideration the thousands of earnest young men and young women who cannot afford to leave home for advanced courses. Has the city no duty to them? Shall not Democracy stand for equality of opportunity? Siiall the desire to drink from the founts of liberal culture be stifled or denied them because the support of their parents or of themselves is their paramount obli- gation? Granted that these students desire only two years of advanced studies, ought not day or night courses be open to them? Here, again, the example of the Cincinnati University becomes classical. Seventy- seven per cent of its student body comes from parents who were denied higher education. Or, looking at it from another point of view, "The University is holding the door of opportunity open to at least 1,100 stu- dents who would not be able to get a higher education if it did not exist. All the facts go to show that Cincinnati students come from the modest homes of people of limited means, representing the thrift and substance of the city's "population." If we would have the City- Mind properly activized, poverty should never become an excuse or a cause for its weakness or failure. Let me direct your attention to another consideration. Not only are the favored Universities more costly, but they are overcrowded and are becoming unwieldy. Of necessity a selective process is pur- sued under an increasingly more rigid entrance examination which makes admission to them the more difficult. I am not advocating a lowering of standards, but I am trying to indicate how a Municipal University may co-ordinate its High School courses with University demands so as to make the educational chain continuous, and how it may give cul- tural privileges to those who are not striving for academic degrees. The complexity of our municipal life is a challenge to specialism. The city is calling for experts. There is scarcely a phase of municipal administration, finance, food, hygiene, education, philanthropy, health, building, streets, which does not invite the expert. Whence do these men come? They are, doubtless, University graduates who have been invited there by big industries or city authorities. Why should the city not train its own servants as its experts? A City University in closest touch with civic administration becomes a Bureau of Municipal Re- search. Each department of the City University will become a labora- tory for the city. 6 The University must become a dynamo of moral energy. The na- tion is witnessing a remarkable ethical awakening. On all sides we hear the call for righteous leadership. We never before were so keen on idealism, vision, conscienceful politics as we are today. We never before were so ashamed of the brazen corruption m municipalities. The rising educational standards go hand in hand with the demand for the moralization of the ballot, of capital, of labor, of civic office. Has the University no credit for this splendid moral re-inforcement ? Have the people not been stirred by the leadership which caught the flame of enthusiasm and idealism from the altars of Alma Maters? H the recent ideals of civic leadership as incarnated in Theodore Roosevelt, William H. Taft and Woodrow Wilson bring glory to Harvard, Yale and Princeton, is not a rainbow of brilliant promise and responsibility thrown upon all the institutions of higher learning? Who can esti- mate the myriad rays of moral stimulus and civic enthusiasm which, having emanated from them, are slowly breaking through the walls of compact institutionalism and percolating down to the humblest inhabi- tant of our land? There is no clash between the University-Mind and the City-Mind ! The University-Mind is essentially one of inquiry, of freedom, of search for the truth and of devotion to it. No longer glorying in its classic aloofness or undemocratic isolation, the University stands today as the citadel of learning for the sake of the largest and fullest life. It holds the triumphs of the intellect, the visions of the seers, the glories of the humanities, the excellencies of the spirit ni trust for the people. Its ideal is consecrated service. The University is morally committed to practical idealism. Is not the City-Mind more than a gloating over its materialism of street and store, of architecture and administration? Is it not more than a clash of men and ideas? Is it not the attitude of loyal service to the citizens thereof, and of consecrated duty of the citizens to the city they inhabit? Do not the ideals of both city and University supplement and complement each other? See, then, what it will mean to a city to be blessed with the moral reservoir of its own University ? A City University will develop its own cultural type. It will train its own preachers of righteousness, haters of fraud, defenders of the poor, blazers of new paths in municipal activity. A municipal Univer- sity will be the city's greatest asset. What a nev; charm it will add to the attractions of a community? What new streams of culture will flow into municipal channels? A city begets a new distinction when it flowers into a University. It will seem like some towering pyramid of inspiration built upon the solid and expansive mass of the common people. Around it children will crowd with their ambitions to climb to the top. CXit of it will come the poorer no less than the wealthier to enter again the arena of life. Out of it will come the trained engi- neer, teacher, lawyer, physician, social worker, all lovers of, and workers for, their city. It will stand as a watch-tower in times of distress. Its influence will soften the harshness of commercialism. Its attractions will draw to it men and women of light and leading. Your factories will do better work, your industries will be examples of efficiency. The University Spirit will lave the community as with a baptism of hal- lowed service. The City-Mind will grow up to the University. The University-Mind will go out to the city. Am I wron^, 022 164 978 vocacy of a Municipal University as the most logical and progressive step in the education of the future, the education of, and in, a city for the benefit of the nation? I do not know your city or your problems, but I suspect that they are not unlike conditions generally prevalent in our country. I do not know the number of pupils who annually leave Akron for other centers of learning or the hundreds who remain home because there are no local opportunities for higher education open to them. Three things, however, I do know. You have here the great Buchtel College of whose splendid traditions you are proud, and whose future becomes a matter of loving concern. It is finely endowed, and properly equipped. It is presided over by a man of large scholarship and sweep of cultural experience. It has a faculty of enthusia.stic and scholarly professors. It has five hundred men and women who are happy to acknowledge it as their Alma Mater. And you stand now at the cross-roads! The second fact I know is that your halting between two opinions is your hesitancy to move forward from Buchtel College to the City of Akron University. \ou are proud of its tradition. You may not desire a change of name. You may feel a pang at the loss of identity. But growth means outgrowth. You must and you will advance not because you love Buchtel less, but because you will love the Akron University more. Every maiden betrothed to her beloved is proud of the memories that cling to her old home; fondly cherishes the family name which blessed her at birth. Yet marriage brings her the name of her husband. Does the assumption of the new name mean a betrayal of the old? If what I have said tonight about the spirit and advantages of a Municipal University in the light of conditions as I find them in the cities of America has any weight, you will give me the right as your guest to repeat the words of Elijah, "How long halt ye between two opinions?" The third fact is that Akron is entering upon an era of industrial prosperity, whose influence upon the civic and educational life of this city can scarcely be estimated now at its true value. You are becoming or, doubtless, now are the Rubber Tire Center of this country. There are twenty-two rubber-tire industries here, worth $200,000,000. These industries have brought a new population hither. These industries are born of and are fed by the brains of experts. These industries are in their infancy. Who can tell what new discoveries in the chemistry of rubber await the eager student? By this industry alone you are able to Akronise the country. A University strong in its scientific departments has here a world-gripping opportunity. In your own boys you may be able to greet the masters of the situation. So, each fonu of industrial, economic, social and political life in your city can offer opportunities to engage the energy and capacity of your growing youth. Let me, then, exhort you, to halt no longer, but to march forward to your great goal. You have the College and its endowment ; you have the spirit; you have the chance of a lifetime. I trust that the Akron University may become a living and an inspiring reality, a thing of civic beauty, and an educational joy forever.