Class r(^K IlJ^' 3 MR. FRANCIS' AT PLYMOUTH. DISCOURSE DELIVERED AT PliYMOUTH, MASS. DEC. 22, 1832, IN COMMEMORATION OP THE LANDING OF THE FATHERS BTT COITVERS TRAVtCIS, CONGREGATIONAL MINISTER OF WATERTOWN. PUBLISHED BY REQUEST OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE FIRST PARISH. PLYMOUTH : PRINTED BY ALLEN DANFORTH. 1832. J2\ Bob. Athen Mar 98 06 IN SXCHAKOl P> 7^' SERMON. John iv. 38. OTHER MEN LABOURED, AND YE ARE ENTERED INTO THEIR LABOURS. There is a meaning involved in these words not inappropriate to the present occasion. Jesus reminds his disciples of the foundation already laid for the labors, on which they would enter in the exercise of their office as his ministers. In doing this, he uses expressions that may be ap- plied in a general sense to the relation, in which all men stand to those who have gone before them in the way of duty, enterprise, or suffering. We devote this day to the memory of our Fa- thers. It is theirs, and not our own. There is a spirit of fellowship in the occasion, which recre- ates the heart. Whatever may be the strife or toil, to which we are called elsewhere, here we come together in the tie of a common relation to a past age and a past generation. As dutiful chil- dren we are willing, I trust, to hush every unkind or unworthy feeling, while we stand in the pre- sence of the patriarchs of New-England. I would not do wrong to this anniversary by bring- ing it to bear on the passing disputes of our day. Let this ground at least, first trodden by the feet 4 of the Pilgrim Fathers, be dedicated to peaceful and elevated considerations. Let it be to us what Elis was to Greece of old, a territory which was never suffered to be the scene of war, where Greeks of hostile States became for the time bro- thers, where soldiers laid down their arms, and re- sumed them not till they had left the consecrated region. The story belonging to this day has been so often and so well told, and the reflections it awak- ens have been set forth in so many forms of elo- quence and piety, that every fit topic may seem to be exhausted. I am encouraged, however, with the belief that our interest in the Fathers is not of a nature to grow old, and that he who speaks of them, though feebly and inadequately, has that in his subject which will supply in some degree his own poverty or defects. Indeed the simple and somewhat rude annals of the first days of New-England must gather a continually in- creasing attractiveness, as the distance lengthens through which we look back upon them, and as the consequences of the movement then made in the world's affairs, and so little regarded at the time, are more thoroughly or more extensively developed. It may be true that, strictly speak- ing, antiquity is yet a word almost without mean- ing among us. Our community in the utmost extent of its history is comparatively but a young community, and our oldest age but a green age.* When we look at nations, who count the years on their annals by thousands, whose land is covered Sec Appendix A with remnants that point to a period beyond ilic reach of authentic story, with fallen columns or shattered monuments, still forming in their mel- ancholy beauty a magical connexion between the present moment and the days of classical antiqui- ty, we seem as it were in the childhood of our existence as a distinct people, and are made to feel that when we speak of our Fathers we speak of modern men. But such is the rapidity, with which the generations of mankind rush down through the gates of death, that the venerable strangeness of olden times has grown over the deeds and characters of the men, who two hun- dred and twelve years ago, here took the wilder- ness for their portion. Such are the revolutions of taste, customs, and opinions, that between them and us a space is already interposed, in some respects apparently as wide, as if it were measured by the course of half the ages in man's history, and that even two centuries are sufficient to excite the associations, the conjectures, and the reverend interest, which belong to antiquity. It may be thought, perhaps, that the scenes and the days commemorated on this anniversary are not sufficiently great or brilliant to require or sus- tain these frequent calls upon our attention. It may be thought, that the filial duty of celebrating the Fathers has been already overdone, and that the humble adventure of the New-England set- tlement is, at the best, but a meagre and barren story. The present, with its boasted improve- ments, iis restless spirit of activity, its great achievcmcnls and still greaier promises, presses 6 upon us with a power so stirring and absorbing, that the past, with its poor and unimposing ap- pearance, may seem worthy only to be consign- ed to the curious industry of the speculative anti- quarian. But it is a weak philosophy, which overlooks or despises the day of small things. — The record of the Plymouth settlers seems to me the more attractive, because it is the record of poverty and of humble efforts. There is some- thing refreshing to the spirit in stealing away, as it were, from the imposing greatness of the top- ics and events that now crowd upon the mind with even painful interest, to the quiet and nar- row spot in history occupied by the devoted pil- grims, steadfast and unbroken in their wants, their loneliness, and their sorrows. And when we turn from the picture of our republic as it now is, its apparent destiny as a new and mighty ele- ment of influence on the condition of man, the im- portant attitude which, with a rapidity almost miraculous, it has assumed among the nations, the gigantic results of its untired enterprise, its tide of population ever rolling on and pouring it- self through the vallies and around the rivers of the West, — when we turn from such a survey to that little band who sought an asylum on this winterbeaten shore, we must look upon them with any thing but indifference; we must feel that there is a fascination in this scene of depression and of unpretending perseverance in a good cause, w^iich takes from it, even in the 'eye of the mere man of taste, all appearance of coarseness or lit- tleness. It seems rather to be just the scene on which the mind loves to repose, not tame nor spiritless, yet undisturbed by the glare of a migh- ty and prosperous community. Travellers tell us that they have felt even more pleasure, when standing in solitude by the small sources of rivers that sweep their long course through flourishing and fertile lands, than when gazing on the outlets at which they meet the ocean, where their waters are beaten into foam by the keels of commerce, or reflect the towers and walls of a crowded city. In history, as in the traveller's experience, the splendid is not always the most interesting.* It is my purpose to arrange the views I may present under two divisions, corresponding to the suggestion in the text. Our Fathers laboured, and we have entered into their labors. They subdued and prepared the field ; we have inherit- ed the results of their toils, as materials for fur- ther cultivation and ceaseless improvement. I. In estimating the labors of the men, who gave the first impulse to the settlement of New- England, we must by no means confine our view to the affecting story of their personal suflferings. We must regard them as occupying an important place in the long line of reformers, who have stak- ed all that men hold dear, and life itself, in the cause of valued principles. It is not mere hard- ship or self-sacrificing toil, that stamps a noble character on human efforts. The vicious man will sometimes suffer more and work harder to gratify his passions, than the demands of virtue would require him to do in order to subdue them. * See Appendix B, The votary of avarice checrfiilly endures priva- tions more rigorous than those of monastic disci- pline, and gives himself up to a base martyrdom for gold with an unwavering spirit of constancy and self-denial. It is only when we regard men as devoted, heart and hand, to the sentiment of duty and to the solemn law of conscience, that their courage, firmness, and endurance assume a character of moral dignity. It is the conviction of a righteous cause, which sanctifies the quali- ties. We feel that there is a privilege in belong- ing to the same species with those who have de- fied power, smiled upon danger, and stood up against contempt, in strong allegiance to what they believed to be the right and the true. These have been the working-men in the world's ad- vancement. Great principles and important priv- ileges have gained a safe establishment among mankind chiefly at the expense of the labors and lives of reformers ; and the effective improvement of the race has been measured by the progress of successive reformations. This has been the case, for the most part, in civil affairs, in science, and in religion. These steps in the moral or intellectual progress of man have sometimes been the result of gradual and quiet changes, unobtrusive, perhaps unob- served at the successive stages, but producing at last a large amount of improvement in standards of thought, or habits of action. A diffusion of light, slow but continually expansive, takes place in the altered opinions or enlarged conceptions of individual minds, by the added contributions of n 9 long series of years. Errors are undermined, rather than beaten down. Unreasonable usages are suffered to die out, instead of being demolish- ed. The stream is fed by secret rills and obscure rivulets, till its course becomes wide and its cur- rent irresistible ; and we ascertain that the world has gone forward, only by comparing with each other periods of time somewhat distant, or coun- tries somewhat remote. But, for the most part, the advances of man- kind have not been so peaceful and silent. The most powerful changes have been the effects of strong and rapid revolutions. Improvement breaks forth, as it were, in irruptions. The elements of the social state are shaken, heaved, and thrown into new forms by impulses that came apparently all at once, though in fact the materi- als for the explosion were gathered slowly and in secret. When the crisis arrives, ardent minds start up prepared to act upon it, and to be acted upon by it. They speak in tones, the echos of which ring far and wide, and awaken the slum- bering, or summon those who were only waiting for the call. Then old institutions are questioned boldly by minds that have thrown themselves into the encounter, determined not to be turned aside; and the unprepared supporters of established abuses, alarmed by the storm bursting over their heads, find themselves suddenly compelled to ral- ly to the defence of what they had been accus- tomed to receive lazily, as an unquestioned inher- itance. The work of ages seems to be done in a few years 5 or rather, a few years seem to pre- 10 pare work for ages. The spirit of man leaps from under tlie burden of oppression, misrule, and worn-out errors, and enters upon a path that, opens into regions of broader and clearer light, as it reaches forward through the tract of time. — The consequences of such striking and powerful movements are not soon developed. The impulse may be given by a few single blows ; but it will require centuries to estimate the extent and ac- tion of the vibrations, that will thus be propagat- ed through the world's affairs. Such a revolution had been in operation about a century, when our ancestors came to these shores, as the forlorn hope in carrying forward the work in a new quarter of the world. They stood in their lot at one of the most agitating pe- riods of a contest of principle against authority, which is even now far from being brought to a close. The sound, which had gone forth from Germany, was repeated with some variations in other places, and English Puritans were the legi- timate successors of Luther and Zwingle. That movement, which history emphatically and ex- clusively denominates the Reformation, as it was itself the mighty and concentrated effect of pre- ceding events, became, in its turn, perhaps the most powerful and expansive in the series of caus- es that have given character and direction to the progress of the human race.* It was introduced into England under circumstances unfavorable to the speedy operation of its true principles and genuine influence. It was made the ally of the * See Appendix C. 11 profligate passions and the haughty ambition of a monarch, whose highest praise is, that his brute energy was an instrument of more good than he intended. Henry the eighth would have the re- formation proceed no further than as it might minister to his own aggrandizement, his revenge, or his poHcy.* His arbitrary and tyrannical daughter, the Maiden Q,ueen, loved power and its glittering pomp too well, not to foster with all care whatever might gather veneration around the throne and its appendages. Of course she look- ed with angry jealousy on the disposition to in- troduce simplicity into the spirit or the rites of re- ligion, or to shake the fabric of ecclesiastical aristocracy. She hovered around the suburbs of popery, and was withheld from it, probably, only by the persuasion that it was better to exercise power herself, than to submit to the exercise of it from a foreign potentate. But though so pow- erful a party were, to use the expressive words of the Leyden pastor, " enamoured of the Romish hierarchic as of a stately and potent ladie,"t yet the authority of the old church, which had so long overshadowed the Christian world, was defied and overthrown. That was a large and impor- tant step. The spirit of reform had gained an entrance 5 and though it was compelled to strug- gle against the selfish or narrow views of sover- eigns, of courts, and of a hierarchy, and to take a circuitous course amidst the wiles of state policy, still it could nowise be banished or suppressed. * The causes of this are well stated by Neal, Hist, of the Puritans. I, 74. J J » t John Robinson'0 Just and JVecessary JJpologic, Src. p. 3. 12 The cause of English reformation, enthralled and shackled as it was, failed not to find advo- cates consistently faithful to its interests. Among those, who desired that the good work should not stop at the beginning, we must place that devot- ed class of men, whose spirit and principles were deeply imbibed by the Plymouth colonists. — Those, whom the fierce bigotry of Mary had driv- en into exile, returned with a strong love for that simplicity of worship and equality of rights, which they had witnessed on the continent m the church- es of Geneva, Frankfort, and other places. But they found on the throne a Q,ueen, who was not long in letting them know that such a wide de- parture from the old religion was by no means agreeable to her taste, and who was determined to uphold, in all its completeness, the cumbrous and gorgeous array of the English church. The rigorous execution of the Act of Uniformity laid the foundation for that definite separation from the establishment, which has ever since existed. A numerous and continually increasing party was thenceforth distinctly known under the name of Puritans, who aimed at that purer form of faith and worship, which they believed themselves bound to seek and maintain in conformity with the true principles of the reformation. This name, however, was not confined to the separa- tists from the Church. It was applied to many who found reasons to satisfy their consciences in still remaining within its pale. It seems, indeed, to have been a name of ignominy affixed to all, whether within or without the Church, who were 13 the friends of a more thorough reform, than was agreeable to such as refused the yoke of Popery indeed, but were wilUng to take upon their necks another nearly as heavy.* Of the distinguished body, thus memorable in British history, the men, whose services it is our pride and our happiness to commemorate this day, were a worthy portion. The story of the Leyden church, formed, to use the words of Secretary Morton, of " divers godly Christians of our En- glish nation in the North of England, not only witnessing against human inventions and addi- tions in the worship of God, but minding most the positive and practical part of divine institu- tions," is too familiarly known to you, that I should repeat it. The character and direction, which this little community took from the influ- ence of John Robinson, — a man scarcely to be mentioned without a pause for eulogy and respect- ful remembrance, — were such as to qualify it well for the high vocation to which it was called, as the vanguard of religion and freedom in a new world. His good sense led him to shun the ex- travagance of Brown, and to discard the name derived from that inconstant man, at first a fiery separatist, and at last an eager conformist 5 and his catholic spirit and enlarged views were well adapted to correct the errors or temper the ill directed fervor, to which even good men are lia- ble at a period of religious revolution or of right- eous resistance.! We are, then, to consider our ancestors as con- *Sec Appendix D. fSec Appendix E. 14 stituting a part — an important part — of a long line of reformers ; and it is with reference to this fact that their labors are to be regarded as pecu- liarly interesting and valuable. It is also neces- sary to take this fact into the account, in order to make a fair estimate of their characteristic vir- tues and faults. We must remember that they were cradled, reared, and grew old in the midst of conflict, — that theirs was a lot of continual struggle and sacrifice; and we must expect to find in them both the good and the evil, which naturally spring from such circumstances. The providence of God watches for our race in ways that are not as our ways, and with thoughts that are not as our thoughts, requiring us to purchase good at the price of contending with evil, and compelling even bad passions and selfish aims to minister to happy results. We may think it w ould be better for the great interests of man- kind, if improvement might always be had regu- larly in the quiet progress of common causes and effects, in what may be termed the natural order of things, with healthful impulses, and in easy de- velopements. We may imagine that an advan- tage thus gained by an individual or a nation, coming, as it were, naturally in its place, would be more justly appreciated, and, as a matter of course, would be a starting point, from which men would peacefully proceed to other advan- tages. But in all this theory there is doubtless a fairer promise than the reality, if it could be had, would fulfil. At any rate, such is not the actual state of tlie case. The world always has 15 been, and perhaps always will be, a battle ground, where from time to time the true and the false, the right and the wrong, the warm love of the new and the zealous attachment to the old, meas- ure strength and struggle for victory. Good is to be gained, in a great part at least, irregularly and out of the ferment produced by peculiar exi- gencies. Not unfrequently it must spring out of evil itself, and be wrung from hostile circum- stances by a strong pressure. It is no little con- solation to the spirit, when it sickens over the darker pages of man's history, to see that even from the midst of oppression, injustice, and mis- rule have come great efforts, which have rapidly carried forward the improvement, or vindicated the rights of communities. The case of the Fa- thers of New-England was one of these. They would never have engaged in that perilous enter- prise, the result of which was so glorious, — they would not have loosed themselves from the strong ties of country, friendship, and domestic chari- ties, — they would not have crossed the wide ocean, and gathered new homes on a shore un- traced by the foot of civilized man, — they would not have adventured upon all the forms of danger and want that must belong to the office of being the jSrst to subdue the wilderness of a new conti- nent, — if they could have found safety and tolera- tion in their father-land. The event has shown that God meant the exigency for good ; but it was good necessarily wrought out through the medium of hardship to be endured, and of wrong to be suffered or resisted. 16 In these circamstanccs was found the blessing of that trying disciphne, by which our Forefathers were prepared for the part they were destined to accompHsh in the great designs of Providence. The hardships of their situation, as reformers, trained them to the arduous office of colonizing the wilds of America. It was this stern influence which nerved their minds for the heroic enterprise, and enabled them to bring hither, amidst circum- stances of deep depression and discouragement, the germ of those forms of freedom and improve- ment, to which the world is now looking with ever increasing interest, as furnishing signal and exciting lessons of instruction. The energy of the human character is not only powerfully exhi- bited, but mainly created, in the process of over- coming difficulties. The progress, which begins and is continued in struggle, at length stimulates men to a degree of unwavering courage, strong endurance, and resolute self-sacrifice, of which they could not have believed themselves capable. When we see them compelled to contend inch by inch for the ground, which should in justice have been conceded at once, and pressing onward and upward in a righteous cause against a host of obstacles, our compassion or indignation may be strongly excited ; but we are relieved by reflect- ing that this is precisely the way, in which they are most effectually braced and strengthened to accomplish a great amount of good. Without this discipline, the settlement of our country might have taken place, at another time, under influences far less favorable to the production of 17 happy consequences, and the colonists of New- England would probably have passed away un- noticed in the common mass of worthy men. — The hard necessity of their case revealed to them their own strength. The power that was in them might have slumbered unused, had not the strong pressure of their condition taught them what they could do or bear, as the rich mine beneath the surface may be disclosed by the lightning's flash, which rends the earth.* But while there was good in all this discipline, there was also evil scarcely to be avoided. To extract from a tuition so harsh and exasperating none but happy influences, is a task requiring such circumspection as can hardly be expected of man. In all such cases, so much vigilant cau- tion, so much strenuous self-command are neces- sary, in order, by a sort of moral chemistry, to disentangle the pure from the impure in the midst of which it is found, that the separation is, per- haps, never entirely eflfected. Strong feeling is unavoidably brought into action ; and this, though it be a necessary agent in great movements, can never act long and sharply without bringing into jeopardy the consistency and dignity even of the best men. The blessings, which spring from ac- tion and reaction, are in their nature exposed to this peril. A blow is given from one side and a rebound takes place from the other ; and amidst the fermentation and strife of the crisis, amidst the zeal of the onset on one part and of defence on the other, it rarely happens that men see the *See Appendix F. 18 point at which they ought to stop, or, if they see it, are willing to stop there. Do we ask too much, when we require that these considerations may be allowed to mitigate the censure passed upon the faults of that noble band of confessors, among whom we find the Ply- mouth and Massachusetts settlers ? I do not refer to the miserable abuse heaped upon their character and cause, in the keen excitement of controversy, by the bigoted churchmen of their day, like the sanbenitos in which the Inquisition dressed out its victims. That may well be suf- fered to pass into the oblivion, to which the ex- travagance of heated partizans should gladly be consigned. I allude to those grave accusations, which men of moderation and sober judgment have sometimes brought against that whole body of reformers, who are classed under the general name of Puritans. We are told of their unwor- thy and absurd prejudices, their unreasonable scruples, and their strong passions. We are re- minded of stern and uncompromising qualities, amounting, it is alleged, almost to a renounce- ment of the graces, the courtesy, and the respect, which dignify and sweeten life. We are present- ed wilh the image of men of dark and severe countenances, of harsh demeanor, stiffly devoted to whimsical peculiarities, and frowning on the innocent liberties of social existence.* If, how- ever, there ;were a foundation for such charges in their full extent, shall we discard the apology that may be found in the oppressive and exasperating ^Seo Appendix G. 19 circumstances that weighed heavily upon these men for a long series of years, and forget that such faults are not worthy for a moment to be laid in the balance against those sterling qualities of excellence, those substantial merits, which en- abled them to become the benefactors of the world by their deeds and sufferings ? Trace the history of the treatment they received at the hands of church and state from the time of the eighth Henry through that of the first Charles, and shall we, sitting at ease in our Zion, wonder to find the feelings of those, who were spurned as out- casts for claiming the common rights of con- science, becoming sometimes stern, rigid, or sour during such a process ? When, for instance, the Leyden church sought a grant from the Virginia company, and craved permission, as for a privi- lege, to banish themselves across the pathless ocean to the forests of these shores, the only boon they could obtain, wiih regard to religious free- dom, was, that ""the king would connive at and not molest them, provided that they carried peace- ably," but would allow them no toleration under his seal. Shall we think that we have made a surprising discovery, if men are found not free from asperity, when they are taught to esteem it a favor to be permitted to exist in a wilderness, and take their portion with the wolf and the sav- age during good behavior ? But these accusations are by no means well founded to the extent, in which they are general- ly stated. At the period when our ancestors came to this country, the Puritans were a respect- 20 able, grave, and dignified class, austere in their general character doubtless, but not inclined to despise the elegancies or refinements of life. — Some of the best scholars in the kingdom were in their number. A charge implying that they were factious and vulgar disorganizers is without truth. There were bad and wrong headed men among them, undoubtedly ; and when was there a cause requiring boldness and energy in its advo- cates, that was not sometimes tarnished by ex- travagance or folly ? But in the earlier part of their course, — and it is that of which I now speak, — before the pressure of circumstances had be- trayed the party into bitterness and excess, they were as a body distinguished by conscientious moderation. They looked indeed with but little favor on the trappings, the stateliness, and the official pomp of the establishment ; but it was because they believed, as they said without affec- tation and in the honesty of their hearts, that these things were not according to the simplicity of the Gospel. For a long time they cherished kind and filial feelings towards the church of their country, though they thought and^ lamented that she had stopped midway on the path of reform. — Even Barrow, a warm leader among the Inde- pendents, when he was asked upon his trial, whether the church of England were a true church or not, went no further in his reply than to say, — " as it is now formed, it is not ; but there arc many excellent Christians who belong to its com- munion."* They did not look with so much *Bogue & Bennell's History of Dissenters, 1, 133.— The kind and 21 veneration on the carved work of the sanctuary^ as some of their cotemporaries 5 but they did not therefore aim to demolish the temple. Was it moroseness, that they reverenced the Sabbath, and were shocked with the Book of Sports, — that they deemed the Lord's day more profitably and appropriately spent in the sobriety of religious occupations, than in may-games and morris-dan- ces ? If so, some even of the dignitaries of the church must share the reproach ; for they were equally grieved at these violations of decency. — That these persecuted but unbroken champions of a righteous cause were, for many years, good and dutiful subjects of the king, cannot be denied except on the authority of the slanders of such men as Bancroft and Laud. When we consider how intimately the religious errors and abuses, which they opposed, were connected with the throne and the civil establishment, it is remarka- ble that they so long discriminated with patience and caution between the duties of remonstrance against the former and of obedience to the latter, manifesting a reasonable though not servile loyal- ty, while they kept consciences void of offence. — Their situation in this respect was not unlike that of some of the early Christians, whom the empe- ror Julian endeavored to entrap into idolatry by placing near his own statues the images of Jupi- ter and other gods, so that while, in conformity to the custom of the Romans, they bowed to the former as a token of submission and honor, they respectful disposition manifested in the well known letter " aboard the Arbella," by the leaders'of the Massachusetts settlement, shciuld bo re- membered in tiiis connexion. ^9 might seem to render the homage of worship to the latter.* WiUiams, bishop of Lincoln, once ventured to say, "that the Puritans were the king's best subjects and he was sure would carry all at last, and that the king had assured him that he would treat them more mildly for the future." It is a curious fact, that for saying this. Laud caused an accusation to be brought against Wil- liams in the Star-Chamber, for revealing the king''s secrets.^ We are sometimes told that the class, to whom our Fathers belonged, were bigots in unimpor- tant matters, and wasted a disproportionate strensth of zeal on little thin<]js. But it should be remembered that the points, about which man- kind interest themselves, are little or great ac- cording to the consequences to which they lead or the principles they involve. Estimated by this standard, the ardor with which these reformers entered even into questions about the white sur- plice, or the sign of the cross, will scarcely ap- pear misplaced or exaggerated. And even if they did sometimes think too much of trifles, and if their conduct on some occasions seems to us like a strong man lifting his arm to strike a feather, still we should remember that by the constitution of our nature an overstrained enthusiasm is a sort of necessary stimulus to those who have a great cause in hand, and that without the disposition *Cave's Primitive Christianity^ p. 72. ■j-Jones'a Lj/e of Bp. Hall, p. 150.— See Ihe touching and indignant remonstrance of the ministers of Devon and Cornwall, ns given by Neai, Hist, of the Puritans, H, 92 —The testimony of the Dutch to the ex- emplary and peaceable character of the Leyden congregation is too well known to be adduced here. 23 to magnify the importance of contested points, few undertakings of much toil or danger would be attempted or successfully accomplished. Are we reminded that our Fathers, the eager vindicators of religious liberty for themselves, were in their turn guilty of persecution ? We can but say, that this fact adds another to the many melancholy lessons of human inconsistency. But where and when have the champions of the right and the just been always right and just themselves ? The reformation from Popery was soon disgraced by some of the very errors, from which it undertook to set men free. But the principles, which it vindicated and established were none the less valuable on that account. So the cause of religious liberty, for which our Fa- thers entered the breach in contest with the pow- er of a proud hierarchy, was not less to be prized, nor the debt of gratitude we owe them for wa- ging battle for it the less, because they were not always true to it in their own example. If their conduct in this respect be viewed comparatively, as it ought partly to be viewed, it may be fairly said that with more excuse for intolerance, they were less intolerant than their oppressors. It should not be forgotten that legal toleration for dissenters was a thing unknown in England until 16S9, and then was but a grudged and imperfect concession.* With respect to this point, it should always be observed that the Plymouth colony was in a considerable degree honorably distin- *.See Appendix H. guishcd from that of Massachusetts, by a more tolerant and forbearing spirit. f I have adverted to the labors, which the colo- nists of New-England shared in common with the great company of reformers. But we must not pass unnoticed, on this occasion, those per- sonal labors and personal sufferings, which laid the foundation of a flourishing community on these shores. The whole transaction seems to me to wear an aspect of peculiar moral greatness. You know it all. You know the anxious appre- hensions, which gathered over the little congre- gation in Holland, their vexatious negociations, the fraud that in different forms spread its snares around their removal, their devout confidence in God and in " the omen of a good cause," their prayers, and their tears. You have often thought of that solitary vessel, which, having been aban- doned by her companion, as if to leave her alone with the glory of the heroic enterprize, pursued her cheerless course over the wide waste of wa- ters. I venture to say, you have felt that with that ship are connected associations, in some re- spects not less touching and great than those, which history has attached to the little and crazy fleet of that wonderful man who, somewhat less than a century and a half before, reposing with dauntless trust on the conclusions of his own mind, revealed a new and vast continent to the gaze of the old world. Your thoughts have fol- lowed her course with a solemn interest, arising from the persuasion that a great experiment for fHutchinson's /fis/. of Masaachuselts^ II, 421. 25 humanity was hanging on her fate. Your hearts have sunk to see her shaken with the fierce winds, and tossing amidst the fury and blackness of the tempest ; and you have ahnost heard the cries for deliverance poured forth by those devoted men, with no rehance but their faith, yet strong in that as in an overcoming power. You have marked how the providence of God, having chosen this vessel to be the messenger of high purposes, held its watch over her amidst danger and distress ; and if the Roman chieftain could say in his pride to his dismayed pilot — " wherefore do you fear while you carry C^sar, " — with how much better reason might it have been said to him who sat at the helm of the Mayjflower — fear not, for you carry the hope of freedom and of piety ! At length you have found them on this barren coast, thanking God on their knees for deliverance from peril and death. You have accompanied them, as if side by side, while they explored the coun- try, and finally marked this spot for their rest. — You have seen the desolation of disease and death spreading among the little band, while under the stern severity of winter they sat at their board with want and famine. You have followed them in their intercourse with the savages, — an inter- course of fearful apprehension, relieved occasion- ally by the kindness of Massasoit, Hobamak, and him who, when he died, made the affecting re- quest that they would pray for him " that he might go to the Englishman's God in heaven." — The story of all that was projected, done, or en- dured from the first motion of the proposal for 4 26 emigration to the time, when the remnant of the sufferers found themselves here at last in comfort- able homes, is as familiar to you all " as house- hold words." Here at least the genius of the place will not permit the toil and sufferings of the pilgrims to be forgotten. Here at least you will feel, that "as an eagle stirreth up her nest, fluttereth over her young, spreadeth abroad her wings, taketh them, beareth them on her wings 5 so the Lord alone did lead them, and there was no strange god with them." How much mean- ing may we now attach to that affecting saluta- tion, which fell upon the ears of the surprised pilgrims with startling pleasure, — "Welcome Englishmen !" Yes, welcome to the wants and the labors of a wilderness, — welcome to privation, distress, and wasting toil, — but welcome too to the high honor of kindling the beacon-light of the Gospel in a region of darkness, and welcome to the glorious reward of martyrs for truth and ser- vants to God !* II. It is time that I should pass to a brief consideration of the other portion of my subject, and remind you that we have entered into the la- bors of the Fathers, that their sufferings and their courage were the price of an inheritance to us, concerning which our prayer should be, that we may know how to prize it as we ought. It was the lot of the pilgrims, — a lot to which the bene- factors of mankind have been often called, — To sow in peril, and let others reap The jocund harvest. ' Se« Appendix I. ' ;i 27 Their own^ phrase, was that "they [should be but as stepping-stones to others, who might come after them."* The planting of New-England under such cir- cumstances and by such men gave birth to conse- quences of far more important and extensive ope- ration, than could have been anticipated. It is one of the most impressive of those instances, in which God teaches us that events such as man despises sometimes contain the moving springs of the greatest interests. How utterly hidden from the eyes of the hierarchy and the government of England was the nature of that work, of which they were the unconscious instruments ! Em- phatically might it be said to them, as the favor- ite son of Jacob said to his brethren, " that which ye devised for evil, God devised for good, to bring about, as it now appears, the preservation of a numerous people."! While they were framing and urging the severest measures against trifling forms of dissent, while they were inflicting fines, imprisonment, or death, as the penalty of non- conformity, while they were authorizing inquisi- torial persecutions under the name of judicial proceedings,— all unknown to themselves they were in fact preparing the foundations of a new empire ; they were casting abroad seeds which on another continent were to yield fruits for the healing of the nations ; they were driving from themselves men, who carried with them principles and feelings, the operation of which has added a ^Belknnp'a Amer Biography, II. 168.-See Appendix K. fGen.L, 20, Geddea'a Translation. 28 volume of new meaning to man's history. So that if here a refuge has been opened for the spirit of enhghtcned freedom, if here an opportunity is presented of trying fairly the experiment whether man is worthy of the high privilege of self-govern- ment, and can keep it, the whole may be regarded as the result of the insupportable action of that bad spirit, which banished from England some of her best minds and purest hearts.* I suppose few events could have been deemed more insigni- ficant by James and his court, than the departure of the puritan emigrants for the wilds of America. At that time their interest was absorbed and their minds agitated by the negotiation with Spain for Prince Charles's match, and the question of neu- trality in the contest between the house of Aus- tria and the states of Bohemia. Yet how do sub- jects like these dwindle and vanish in the true es- timate of great influences, when contrasted with the voyage of that small vessel, which, on the 6th of September, 1620, sailed from the harbor of Plymouth in the Old World, and finally cast her anchor in that of Plymouth in the New World ! We have entered into the labors of the Fathers in the blessings of our civil institutions ; for these may justly be regarded as the ultimate result of the impulses imparted by them. The English puritans, though faithful and loyal subjects till they were forced by circumstances into resist- ance, had adopted principles which were destined, as they were progressively developed, to operate as a strong check on arbitrary power. They con- *See Appendix L. 29 tended strenuously for some of the elementary rights of conscience ; and these are so intimately connected with civil rights, that the questions re- lating to the exercise of power with regard to both could not long be separated. Religious enthusi- asm is very likely to contain within itself the germ of the general principles of freedom, and to open the way for political speculations tending towards the doctrine, so harsh to royal ears, that power is a trust to be bestowed or revoked at the pleasure of those for whose good alone it should be exer- cised. England herself at this hour owes much to the men who, even by the confession of some writers whose partialities were all the other way, had the honor of infusing into her Constitution its most vigorous portions of liberty 5 for have not recent events in that kingdom borne testimony to the productive energy of the same spirit that for two centuries and a half has been at work there, sometimes flashing out in violence, sometimes struggling onwards slowly, and sometimes en- thralled or fiercely driven back, but always alive, always watchful, always ready for action ? At the period when New-England was colon- ized, the notions of civil freedom in the mother country, even among its best friends, were not a little confused and immature. But there were some principles, and more feelings, on this sub- ject sufficiently distinct and vital to render it pro- bable, that with the aid of opportunity they would ripen into clearness, consistency, and strength. — Such opportunity was found on these shores. — When the pilgrims, by the treachery of their cap- 50 tain, were placed beyond the limits of the Virginia Company, and their patent of course was useless, before they landed they entered into a compact which, as their Memorialist says, " was the first foundation of the government of New Plymouth," and which, as you know, is considered as con- taining the essential principle of popular and re- publican institutions.* This fact is of impor- tance, as showing that when left to themselves they spontaneously adopted ideas, the whole val- ue and distinct character of which they probably did not fully understand. It indicates that at the outset a principle was in existence, which in its gradual and sure expansion would produce the most extensive effects. And never was it lost, though the occasions for its full operation were comparatively long in coming. We trace its manifestations from time to time through the whole course of our history, in the strong jealousy of encroachment, in the clear apprehension and bold support of rights, even at a period when the colonists were sincerely loyal, and when the sus- picion of a wish to throw off their allegiance to the crown was indignantly repelled. At length it was brought into intense and efficient action, as an element of popular character and feeling, in the struggle which placed the colonies in the attitude of a separate and sovereign people among the nations of the earth. At that fearful crisis the spirit of the pilgrims was matured in the reso- lute wisdom, the moral courage of their descend- *Baylies'3 Hist. Memoir of the Colony of JSTeto Plymouth, I, 29, and Hutchinson's Hist, of Mass. II, 409. 31 ants ; and the voice which then echoed over our hills and along our shores, and mustered the for- ces of a common cause, was but the louder procla- mation of what had been spoken many years be- fore in a manner less audible and distinct. In this connexion, I cannot but remark a striking- coincidence appropriate to the present occasion. It was in the year 1769, a time when the dark storm was gathering, and men suspected that the hour of open and final resistance was at hand, that the Old Colony Club of Plymouth proposed and observed the first Celebration of the Land- ing,* — as if the memory of the Fathers was awak- ened with new interest to hallow the coming strug- gle, that was to finish a work, which they may well be said to have begun in the solitary places of their infant settlements. And when to the arduous conflict succeeded the yet more arduous task of building the frame- work of political and social institutions, when the hard trial of achieving the prize was followed by the still harder one of deciding how it should be preserved and used, when a new and great experiment was to be made in the philosophy of government, when the me- chanism that might constitute a durable common- wealth was to be erected among a people embar- rassed by none of the rubbish of old institutions, and fettered by no remnants of Gothic establish- ments, and when under unexampled circumstan- *Dr. Thacher's Hist, of Plymouth, p. 180. The same writer in- forms us (p. 202) that when the Rock was elevated from its bed in 1774, it fell asunder without violence. No flaw had been previously observed in it ; and some of the patriots found in it an omen of the division oftha British empire. 32 ces of interest and responsibleness a choice was to be made, where — to use the words of one of the greatest men of that day* — " a wrong election might be considered as the general misfortune of mankind," — then was at length reared the struc- ture of a confederate republic, of which we may justly say, that it stands as a monument to the principles and labors of our pilgrim ancestors. A^ain : we have a blessinix. A. A striking illustration of the youthfulness of our country may be found in the fact, that within a very few years it has required only the memory of two men to reach back to the first Plymouth ■colonists. The Hon. Ephraim Spooner,who died in March 1818, was acquainted with the venerable Elder Faunce, who died in 1745 in the 99th year of his age , and Elder Faunce was well acquainted with some of the the first settlers. B. Ernesti, in the fine dedication prefixed to his edition of Cic- ero, has well and truly said — " Nescio enim, naturane nobis hoc datum sit, an errore quodam ipsa antiquitate vehementer move- araur, magisque rebus antiquis, quamvis tenuibus et parvis, quam recentibus vel niaximis afficiamur." C. The causes and consequences of Luther's reformation have furnished a most fertile topic for ingenious and profound specu- lation. The subject has perhaps never been investigated in a more truly philosophical spirit, than in the work of Villers. — That great revolution was doubtless aided in its progress by many concurrent labors, some of which were apparently trivial, but really important. Warton has observed, that " the lively colloquies of Erasmus, which exposed the superstitious prac- tices of the papists with much humour and in pure Latinity, made more protestants than the ten tomes of John Calvin." — Hist, of English Poetry, III. 267. The materials for the final manifestation, which was brought out under the agency of the great reformer, had been long in accumulation, when the matchless energy of that most courageous man put them in ac- tion. The immediate causes of remarkable changes are gen- erally not those, which deserve the most attention. It is said that a work was once projected, to be entitled Historia Refor- mationis ante Reformationem. A similar history might be de- sired with regard to almost all important changes. But the hu- mor of tracing a long series of connexions and dependences among events is too pleasant an exercise of ingenuity not to be abused. I do not remember a more striking instance of the absurd length to which speculations of this kind may be carried 48 than in the concatenation of causes and effects, by which John Newton of Ohiey seriously attempts to show, tliat if Josepli had not dreamed, " mankind had been still in their sins witliout hope, and the counsels of God's eternal love in favour of sin- ners defeated."! See his Authentic Narrative, &,c. Letter VI. D. The term Puritan, for some time after its origin,was not the exclusive designation of those who separated from the Church, but was applied to all such as were remarkable for strictness or severe piety, or such as entertained scruples about complying with some ecclesiastical requisitions. The remarks of Fuller on this subject deserve to be quoted. " The English Bishops," says he, " conceiving themselves impowered by their Canons, began to show their authority in urging the Clergy of their Diocess to subscribe to the liturgie, ceremonies, and discipline of the Church, and such as refused the same were branded with the odious name of Puritans. A name which in this nation first began in this year (1564), and the grief had not been great, if it had ended in the same. The philosopher banisheth the term, (which h poly sec mon) that is subject to several senses, out of the Predicaments, as affording too much covert for cavill by the latitude thereof On the same account could I wish that the word Puritan were banished common discourse, be- cause so various in the acceptions thereof We need not speak of the ancient Catliari or primitive Puritans, sufficiently known by their hereticall opinions. Puritan here was taken for the opposers of the Ilierarchie and Church-service, as resenting of superstition. But propliane mouths quickly improved this Nick- name, therewith on every occasion to abuse pious people, some of them so far from opposing the liturgie, that they endeavoured (according to the instructions thereof in the preparative to the Confession) to accompany the Minister with a pure heart, and laboured (as it is in the Absolution) for a Iife;;M/-e and holy." — The Church History of Britain, b. IX, p. 76. Some of the best prelates in the Church, such as Hall, bishop of Norivich, were reproached with being puritanically inclined, because they would not fall in with the fashionable laxity of principle, while they were willing to abate the rigor of ceremonies and un- important matters for the sake of tender consciences. Under these circumstances the name became an honor, instead of a disgrace ; and there w?s reason for the prayer expressed by an admirer of these good men — "sit anima mea cum Puritanis Anglicanis." In process of time, however, the term Puritan was appropriated entirely to separatists from the Church, and other names to designate the same body succeeded this. " It now appeared," say Bogue and Bennett, "that there were some who wished to make the church of England the half-way house of the reformation, while others were for gonig all the lengths to which the Scriptures might lead. Hence the latter party, who pleaded for a church more pure from all the corruptions of pope- 49 vy, were denominated puritans ; when the act of uniformity was passed, in the reign of Charles the second, they were called non- conformists ; and at the revolution they obtained, from the tol- eration act, the title of dissenters. Hooper, bishop of Gloces- ter, who was burnt alive as a martyr for the protestant religion under queen Mary, was the first puritan or dissenter." Histo- ry of Dissenters, I, 49. See Neal's Hist, of Neio England, ch. II, Peirce's Vindicatioii of the Dissenters, Part I, and Bur- net's Hist, of the Reformation. Part III. E. Brown and Robinson seem to have differed not bo much in principles, as in spirit. Robinson has been called "the Father of the Independents;" but Brown had before him zealously in- culcated the principles of the Independents. They both main- tained the equality and " independence of churches, the right of the brethren to elect and invest with office their minister with- out the sanction of ecclesiastical governors, and in general those views with regard to the nature and power of churches, which rendered the Brownists so odious to the hierarchy. I am not aware that Robinson ever receded in any degree from these principles. The difference between the two men was chiefly in temper and character. Brown was fiery, rash, and unstable, and, as might have been expected, soon deserted his own prin- ciples. Robinson was calm, considerate, and steadfast ; and therefore though he adhered to his views to the last, yet from being at first one of the rigid separatists he became afterwards, by intercourse with Dr. Ames whom he found in Holland, much more mild and lenient with regard to other churches, — insomuch as to give great offence to the violent Brownists who stigmatized him as a Scmi-scparatist. In his Apologia guorundam Chris- tianorwn, &c., printed in IG19, and afterwards translated into English with the title of " A just and iiecessaiy Apologie of certain Christians/' &c., he was more charitable and less for separation than in his " Justification of Separation from the Church of England, against Mr. Richard Bernard his invective," &LC., published in IGIO. Robinson was involved at one time in a controversy with one of the brightest ornaments of the English church, Hall, afterwards bishop of Norwich. Hall wrote an Epistle addressed to him in connexion with John Smith, the pastor at Amsterdam, styled the Se-baptist because he baptized himself by immersion. This letter was directed to them as " ringleaders of the late Separation," and was full of strong and earnest expostulation. Robinson replied to it in " An Answer to a censorious Epistle," in which he complained of being stig- matized by the term ringleader. Hall rejoined in his " Com- mon Apology of the Church of England," &c., in which, with the contemptuous asperity to which even good men are some- times betrayed by the warmth of controversy, he says — " as for the title of ringleader, wherewith I styled this pamphleteer, if I have given him too much honour in his sect, I am sorry. Per-n 7 50 haps I should have put him (pardon a homely, but, in this sense, not unusual word) in the tail of this train. Perhaps I should have endorsed my Letter ' To M. Smith, and his Sliadow." — So I perceive he was," — See The Works of Joseph Hall, D. D. &c., edited by Pratt, vol. VII, p. 171, and vol. IX, p. 401. — Little reason had the churchman to speak thus of a man, whose talents and learning were such that he was selected to hold a public disputation with Episcopius. The maturity, which P^ob- inson's charitable and enlarged views at length reached, is evinced by those admirable passages, so often quoted, in the well known Fast Sermon in July 1020, which justly deserve the high praise bestowed upon them by Prince. F. Foxcroft, pastor of the First Church in Boston, reported it as a saying of our Forefathers, that " they esteemed brown bread and the Gospel good fare." The severity of their circumstan- ces would naturally tend to secure them from idle and corrupt self-seekers, from those who might have been tempted to join them by the lure of wealth or power. Cushman, in the Epistle Dedicatory to his Sermon at Plymouth in 1631, describing the sort of men who were wanted for the new settlement, says — " if there be any who are content to lay out their estates, spend their time, labours, and endeavours for the benefit of them that • shall come after, and in desire to further Lhe Gospel among those poor Heathens, quietly contenting themselves with such hard- ship and difficulties, as by God's Providence shall fall upon them, being yet young and in their strength, such men [ would advise and encourage to go, for their ends cannot fail them." — Yet even then the preacher, it seems, did not think the colo- nists exempt from the danger of selfish motives and purposes ; for in the Sermon (p. 16) he says — " It is reported, tliat there are many men gone to that other plantation in Virginia, which, whilst they lived in England, seemed very religious, zealous, and coDscionable, and have now lost even the sap of grace and edge to all goodness, and are become mere worldlings. This testi- mony I believe to be partly true, and amongst many causes of it, this self-love is not the least. It is indeed a matter of some commendations for a man to remove himself out of a thronged place into a wide wilderness, to take in hand so long and dan- gerous a journey to be an instrument to carry the Gospel and humanity among the brutish heathen ; but there may be many goodly shews and glosses, and yet a pad in the straw ; men may make a great appearance of respect unto God, and yet but dis- semble with him, having their own lusts carrying them : and out of doubt, men that have taken in hand hitherto come, out of discontentment, in regard of their estates in England ; and aim- ing at great matters here, affecting it to be gentlemen, landed men, or hoping for office, place, dignity, or fleshly liberty ; let the shew be what it will, the substance is naught, and that bird of self-love which was hatched at home, if it be not looked to, 51 will eat out the life of all grace and goodness ; and thongh men have escaped the danger of the sea, and that cruel mortality which swept away so many of our loving friends and brethren, yet except they purge out this self-love, a worse mischief is pre- pared for them." Still it may truly be said of ihose who sus- tained the enterprise of the first settlement of New England, and infused into it the spirit of devotedness without which it would have perished, that— in the language of Stoughton in his Election Sermon, — "God sifted a whole nation, that he might send a choice grain over into this wilderness." G. The Edinburgh Review (No. XXV, 1808), in an article on Mrs. Hutchinson's Memoirs of the Life of Col. Hutchinson, has some excellent remarks on the difference between the charac- ter of the earlier Puritans, and that which they acquired after the Restoration, when they were a defeated, and degraded par- ty^ — a difference which has not been sufficiently considered. — *' It is from the wits of that court (the court of Charles the se- cond) however, and the writers of that party," says the review- er, " that the succeeding and the present agp, have derived their notions of the puritans. In reducing these notions to the stand- ard of truth, it is not easy to determine how large an allowance ought to be made for the exaggerations of party hatred, the per- versions of witty malice, and the illusions of habitual superiori- ty. It is certain, however, that ridicule, toleration, and luxury gradually annihilated the puritans in the higher ranks of socie- ty ; and after times seeing their practices and principles exem- plified only among the lowest and most illiterate of mankind, readily caught the tone of contempt which had been assumed by their triumphant enemies, and found no absurdity in believ- ing that the base and contemptible beings who were described under the name of puritans by the courtiers of Charles II, were true representatives of that valiant and conscientious party, which once numbered half the gentry of England among its votaries and adherents." No one, who has read it, can forget the powerful description of the puritan character in the same Review, in the splendid arr tide on Milton, No. LXXXIV, 1825. H. Locke's admirable Letters on Toleration first placed the sub- ject in a clear light, and on the foundation of great general prin- ciples. They have been justly called " the best treatise on re- ligious liberty, which has ever appeared since the day that the chief priests and captain of the temple, and the Sadducees, com- mitted Peter and John to prison for preaching Christ." Locke felt obliged to introduce the first Letter to the world in a very guarded and cautious manner. It was written while he was living as a proscribed man in Holland, and published first in Latin with an evidently studied obscurity, on the title page, as 52 to its author. Limborch, to whom it was dedicated, disclosed the secret to a friend. Locke was much vexed at this, and in a Latin letter to Limborch complains of it, as a piece of treachery he did not expect in his friend, with a tone of almost angry petu- lance, which seems curiously in contrast with the calm and equa- ble character of the philosopher. "Nescis," says he, " inquas res me conjecisti," and begs Limborch to prevent the further circulation of the secret. It is to the honor of Locke that he is known to have been dissatisfied with the terms granted in the Toleration Act by the new Government after the Revolution, and considered them as very inadequate and insufficient. — Lord King's Life of John Locke, &c. vol. L p. 291, 327, and vol. II, p. 310. It would seem as if the sound maxim of Turretin must ap- prove itself at once to the common sense of mankind, — " in re- bus ad salutem necessariis, unusquisque sibi ipsi Theologus es- to." Yet so it is, that men have learned nothing more slowly and reluctantly, than to tolerate one another's opinions. On this subject they would seem to have supposed, that they were absolutely required to renounce those principles of forbearance, upon which they vvjre accustomed readily to act in other things, — as if a belief different from theirs were an offence against God, which they were bound not to pardon. Lord Herbert of Cherbury, in his Life (p. 109) tells us that when he was in France, " Pere Segnerand, confessor to the king, made a ser- mon before his majesty upon the text, that we shou'd forgive our enemies, upon which argument having said many good things, he at last distinguished forgiveness, and said, we were indeed to forgive our enemies, but not the enemies of God, such as were hereticks, and particularly those of the religion (i. e. of the Protestant faith); and that his majesty, as the Most Chris- tian King, ought to extirpate them, wheresoever they cou'd be found." Thus it is, that intolerance can practice no cruelty, for which sophistry cannot find a shelter in some paltry quibble or some miserable distinction. The principles of the Reforma- tion ought, from their very nature, to produce a spirit of tolera- tion ; and on the whole they unquestionably have progressively had this effect, notwithstanding the frequent and lamentable un- faithfulness of Protestants to these principles. Voltaire, who had no partiality for any form of Christianity to bias his judg- ment,' in the £ssai sur Ics Mcciirs remarks, — " Le principe d'examen adopte par les Protestants conduisait necessairement a la tolerance, au lieu que le principe de I'autorite, point fondar Tnentcil de la croyance Romaine, en ecarte non moins neces- sairement : enfin I'intolerance des Protestants n'etait qu'un reste de papisme, que les priricipes memos sur lesquels la reforme etait fondee devaient detruire un jour." But whether Protes- tantism can throw off all blame so easily, or can account for all its own nitolerancc by calling it " a remnant of popery," may be doubted. In connexion with this subject, I am reminded of a mistake 53 of Hume, who affirms that "even so great a reasoner as Lord Bacon thought that uniformity in religion was absolutely neces- sary to the support of government, and that no toleration could with safety be given to sectaries." For this assertion he refers to the essay De imitate ecclesia;. Now that Essay does by no means warrant so broad an inference, as any one may see by an examination of it. It contains indeed exceptionable expres- sions, but it is manifestly not a plea for intolerance ; and Bacon closes it by quoting with approbation from one of the Fathers the remark, *' that those which held and persuaded pressure of consciences, were commonly interested therein themselves for their own ends." The noble stand which Roger Williams, at so early a period, took in favor of the broadest principles of toleration, does great honor to his memory. I. The account of the sufferings, wanderings and adventures of the pilgrims, when they arrived on these shores, is given in a manner extremely interesting from its primitive simplicity and minuteness by Mourt in his " Relation or Journal of the Begin- ning and Proceedings of the English Plantation settled at Plim- oth in New England," &c., published in London 102:2, and in Winslow's " Good Newes from New England ; or a True Re- lation of things very remarkable at the Plantation of Plimoth," &c., published in London 1624. The disjointed manner, in which these Relations were published by our Historical Socie- ty, owing to the circumstance that the abridgement of them in Purchas's Pilgrims was the only authority accessible for a long time, is much to be regretted. Coll. of 3Iass. Hist. Sac. \st Series, vol. VIII, p. 203 and 239, and 2f/ Series, vol. IX, p. 26 and 74. The original edition of Mourt's Relation, as well as that of Winslow, is now in the Library of Harvard College, in which the collection of books and tracts relating to American history and antiquities has become very extensive and valuable, Morton's New England's Memorial, which has been so greatly enriched by the labors of the Hon. John Davis in his very valu- able edition of the book, is so familiarly known that it need scarcely be mentioned as an authority. In connexion with the reference to the Landing of the Fath- ers at Plymouth, it may be observed that there is and has been an error of one day in the celebration of that event. It is now established, I believe, that the difference between O. S. and N. S. was but ten days in the 17th century, and consequently that the Landing should in strict propriety be commemorated on the 21st instead of the 22d of December. Dr. Thacher has dis- cussed this subject, and given the authorities, in a note to his History of Plymouth, p. 25. The error, however, is not of much importance. Whether it be sufficiently important to induce a change in the day of the celebration, must be left to others to judge. 54 Notwithstanding the severe hardships attending the situtation of the first settlers at Plymouth, I know not what reason Hutch- inson had for his doubt, whether, if they had not been encour- aged and strengthened by tlie arrival of Endicot at Salem, who prepared the way for the settlement of Massachusetts, "the plantation would not in a few years have been deserted, and the settlers have removed to some more fertile part of America, or, which is more probable, have returned to England, where, from the change of times, they might have enjoyed civil and religious liberty, ior tiie sake of which they first quitted it, in as great a latitude as their hearts could wish." Hist, of Mass. vol. II, p. 420. The most appalling of their difficulties were probably over, before Endicot settled at Salem. The Rev. Dr. Harris, one of the most learned and thorough antiquarians iu our country, insists upon a distinction between the Plymouth and the Massachusetts settlers, maintaining that the former were " Scpai-atists, and, as respected ecclesiastical polity. Independents," while the latter, to whom appropriately belonged the name of Puritans, "were only Dissenters, and as regarded ecclesiastical polity were Congrcgationalists, and held an accordance and union of churches." Memorials of the First Church in Dorchester, &c. in tioo Discourses July 4, 1830. — Perhaps there was at one time a good foundation for this dis- tinction ; but Plutchinson was probably correct in the remark, that " the Massachusetts people refined and took the name of Congrcgationalists, although it will perhaps be difficult at this day to show any material diffi^rence between the churches of the two colonies ; for although Plymouth never established by act of government the Massachusetts platform, yet in practice they seem generally to have conformed to it.'' — Vol. II, p. 415. K. To the case of our Fathers may be applied the spirit of that beautiful passage in which Lord Bacon, at the close of his re- view of philosophy, describes himself as having made an attempt to tune the instrunients, from which others might produce a full and harmonious concert." "Tandem igitur paululum respiran- tes, atque ad ea, qua3 priEtervecti sumus, oculos retroflectentes, hunc tractatum nostrum non absimilem esse censemus sonis illis et pra3ludiis, quje prajtentant musici, dum fides ad modu- lationem concinnant ; quae ip3a quidem auribus ingratum quid- dam et asperum exhibent; at in causa sunt, ut qua? sequuntur omnia sint suaviora ; sic nimirum nos in animum induximus, ut in cithara musarum concinnanda, et ad harrnoniam veram redigenda, operam navaremus, quo ab aliis postea pulsentur chorda) meliore digito aut plectro." Dc Atigmcntis Scientiarum, lib. VIII, c. III. L. Milton, in one of the fine strains of his indignant eloquence, mourns over the folly of the English government in driving from 55 their country such multitudes of good men and devoted Chiis- tians : — " Next, what numbers of faithful and freeborn English- men and good Christians, have been constrained to forsake their dearest home, their friends and kindred, whom nothing but the wide ocean, and the savage deserts of America could hide and shelter from the fury of the bishops. O sir, if we could but see the shape of our dear mother England, as poets are wont to give a personal form to what they please, how would she appear, think ye, but in a mourning weed, with ashes upon her head, and tears abundantly flowing from her eyes, to behold so many of her children exposed at once, and thrust from things of dear- est necessity, because their conscience could not assent to things which the bishops thought indifferent? What more binding than conscience ? What more free than indifferency ? Cruel then must that indifferency needs be, that shall violate the strict necessity of conscience ! merciless and inhuman that free choice and liberty that shall break asunder the bonds of religion ! Let the astrologer be dismayed at the portentous blaze of comets, and impressions in the air, as foretelling troubles and changes to states ; I shall believe there cannot be a more ill-boding sign to a nation, God turn the omen from us ! than when the inhabi- tants, to avoid insufferable grievances at home, are enforced by heaps to forsake their native country." — Of Reformatio7i in England, &c. book II. M. Berkeley's beautiful " Verses on the Prospect of planting Arts and Learning in America" (Works, vol. Ill, p. 233) have been so often quoted in whole or in part, that it is merely ne- cessary to refer to them in this connexion. One of his biogra- phers has said of them, that " in them another age, perhaps, will acknowledge the old conjunction of the prophetic character with that of the poet to have again taken place." Bishop Watson, in a letter written to Dr. Falconer in 1804, speaking of the probability of new positions to be taken by the political powers of the word, gives it as his opinion, " that America will become the greatest naval power on the globe, and be replenished by migrations of oppressed and discontented peo- ple from every part of Europe." — Anecdotes of the Life of Rich- ard Watson, loritten by himself, &c. p. 327. There is wisdom in cherishing bright hopes of the future ; and we should cleave to them till duty or facts forbid us to be blind to darker prospects. But it remains yet to be seen, wheth- er it shall be the high vocation of our country to realize the splendid promise written for her in the following stanzas of an English poet, who, with great faults, has many passages of striking power and beauty. Thetc is a People mighty in its joulli, A land bejonil (lie Oceans of (he West, Where, though wilh rudest riles, Freedom and Truth Are worshipp'd ; from a glorious mothei's hreast, 56 Who, since liigli Alheni fell, anioag (he rest Sate like the Queen of Nations, bill in woe. By inbred uions(ei's outraged and oppressM, Turns to her chainless child for succor now, It draws the milli of Power in Wisdom's fullest flow. That land is like an Eagle, whose young gaze Feeds on the noontide bean], whose i^olden plume , Floats moveless on Ihe slorni, and in the blaze Of sunrise gleams when Karth is wrapt in gloom ; An epit.iph of glory for the tomb Of murder'd Europe may thy fame be made, Great People: as the sands shalt thou become; Thy growth is swilt as morn, when night must fade; Tlie multitudinous Earth shall sleep beneath thy shade. I would fain hope that no conflict of interests or of heated passions, in our confederacy, may compel us to read so beauti- ful a tribute with the feeling of sadness arising from dark and fearful apprehensions. The old Roman maxim was 7ievcr to despair of the rcpuhlic; and it is a maxim which we should not lightly abandon. N. This illustration is borrowed from Sprat, who, in speaking of the proper manner of imitating the ancients, says — "There are two principal ways of preserving the names of those that are past ; the one by inctures, the other by children. The pictures may be so made, that they may far nearer resemble the origin- al, than children do their parents; and yet all mankind choos6 rather to keep themselves alive by children, than by the other. It is best for the philosophers of this age to imitate the ancients as their children, to have their blood derived down to tliern, but to add a new complexion and life of their own ; — while those that endeavour to come near them in every line and feature, may rather be called their dead pictures or statues, than their genuine offspring." History of the Royal Society of London ^ &c. London. 1734. p. 51. ^ LEFe'll