^^:^ ^ r"^- A 'o , , .^0 s" .^ 40, .':>v^. -?-_ A-^ .->■'% ,^\^ A .A\^ o^-;:^ -u %. <* ^ ^'^ ,G .ie^ ^"-^^. v V A^ .■mmr^ ^oV' % ^'5 V J ^. -^^0^ >^'MW*' > m^ '^'- "<^ e, to be as satisfactory as possible, we shall confine our- selves within as narrow limits as we can. About twelve years ago the plan of our work was originally fixed upon. It began by the purchase and critical examination of books, pamphlets, newspapers, and early periodical publications. 28 containing or referring to documents, correspondence, speeches, parliamentary and legislative proceedings, &c. &c. Of these a large and very valuable collection has been made, containing many papers not elsewhere to be found. During great part of the time our progress was necessarily slow. For the last five years, Mr. P^'orce, excepting a short time in each year, expended on his Annual Register, has been devoted to this work, to the exclusion of every other pursuit. Since the passage of the act, ten out of the " Old Thirteen States" have been visited, and the other three are now undergo- ing examination. In Georgia a thorough examination has been made, not only of the State records and papers, but also of the collection of Joseph Y. Bevan, deceased ; all of the latter have been copied for us, and the whole collection from the former is already copied, or desig- nated for copying. In New Hampshire the whole archives have been examined, and the papers collected have been entirely copied ; the papers of the Historical Society and Portsmouth Athenseum have been selected and copied, including a large and interesting collection of Sullivan's letters. In South Carolina, the public offices at Charleston were ex- amined, and at Columbia we ceased to work, to give time to re- cover, if possible, the legislative records from 1776 to 1782, which are missing. In North Carolina we examined a great deal of the material, and had some copying done. Part of her records are lost, espe- cially the proceedings in 1765, connected with the stamp act. We know where they are in England, and shall procure them. In Virginia we examined enough to know that her whole legis- lative history prior to 1776 is lost, and can only be partially sup- plied by her " Statutes at Large" and the British offices. In all the other States visited, we ascertained the state of the records and papers, and shall know the condition of all before you make your report. In the Department of State, we may venture to say, we have handled every paper connected with the Continental Congress, and the accompanying list will show the material copied, amount- ing to more than thirty thousand manuscript pages. The amount copied in Georgia, New Hampshire, and else- where, we think, will add about twenty thousand pages more. The papers connected with the proceedings from 1774 to 1776, which we have sent for to England, as is known to the Secretary, may amount to five thousand ; and if to this we add the material collected from old periodicals, &c., the whole might reach sixty thousand manuscript pages. This, however, by no means com- prehends the whole material " already secured." 29 The unpublished collection of Dr. Belknap, late of Massachu- setts ; the papers of General Hazzard, of Pennsylvania ; of Trum- bull, of Connecticut ; of Davie, of North Carolina ; and many others, have been placed at our disposal for selection and copying. In truth, sir, every State and public institution which we have visited, has, through the Governors, or other public officers, thrown open their archives, rejoicing to know that the United States had begun a work which none of them could individually do. Thus we may venture to say that nothing is wanting but the time to collect, and have the copying done. Those papers, therefore, "expected to be obtained," strictly speaking, are the material in England, France, Holland, Spain, Cuba, and Canada. We know the disposition manifested by Eng- land and France, and have no doubt access will be granted by the others, and permission to make copies of whatever may be deemed necessary. We come now to the inquiry as to the progress made in the arrangement. As we shall print the whole chronologically, the Secretary will at once perceive that whatever is collected wants only the simple operation of comparison with what has already been done, put- ting it into proper place, and then all is ready for publication. We have now material enough for several volumes, but fre- quently there is a hiatus which requires much time and labor to supply — truly, " hie labor, hoc opus est." Our task would have been an easy one if we had contented ourselves with printing the material just as we find it ; but, pledg- ed, as we are, to the Government, no pains nor expense have been or shall be spared to make the collection complete. We shall, in a very short time, begin to print the first volume of the fourth series, and deliver it early in the next session of Congress. The third point is as to the number of volumes which will be required to complete the work, and the time when the whole will be ready for delivery. We have said before, and now repeat, that, if possible, we will bring the whole within twenty volumes, and now agree to limit ourselves to that number. It will then remain with Congress to say if, after having printed that number, there should still be some papers left, whether we shall go on or not. The Secretary, and all who will reflect upon the nature of the work, must irresistibly come to the conclusion that precision in extent is impossible ; nay, sir, the requisition is destruction. Who can lay his finger on the records of the South, and say to us, " Hitherto shalt thou come, and no farther ?" Who will put forth his hand, and blot out the deeds of Calvert and of Penn ? 30 Who in the North would be satisfied with a mutilated monu- ment of revolutionary glory, or stint the record of pilgrim purity and patience ? As to the time required to complete the whole, our answer must also be uncertain. Perhaps ten years would not be too long time to give ourselves to complete this important work. It may be possibly done in less. The fourth point of inquiry is, the estimate of the money ne- cessary to complete the contract. To these we are able to give a precise answer. Our contract is for fifteen hundred copies ; taking twenty volumes, of eight hundred pages, folio, each, the whole sum would be four hundred and eight thousand dollars. This is a large sum, but we trust we shall show that the cost is not disproportioned to the extent of the work, in comparison with other printing done for the United States, leaving out of view altogether the difficulties to be sur- mounted, and the extraordinary expenses to be incurred by the publishers. The Secretary will observe that there was an alternate in the act as to the cost. By the calculations of Mr. Stubbs, the agent of the department, one work cost ^2 57iper volume, octavo, the other was estimated at $3 20, the lower cost being taken by the Secretary as the standard of our allowance. All which will more fully appear by the following representation made to the Attorney General : Washington, 21*^ March, 1833. Sir : By an act of Congress approved on the 2d March, 1833, the Secretary of State was authorized (on the memorial of M. St. Clair Clarke and Peter Force ) to contract with said Clarke and Force for the publication of " The Documentary History of the American Revolution," to be printed in octavo or folio, as may be agreed upon, provided that the rate of expense shall not exceed the actual cost per volume of the Diplomatic Correspondence now printing, or heretofore printed, under the direction of the Secretary of State, &c." as will more fully appear by the terms of the act herewith transmitted. In point of fact there have been two distinct publications of the Diplomatic Correspondence, one under the editorial direction of Mr. Sparks, the other without any particular editor ; which last is the one " now printing." In both these works all the materials have been furnished from the Department of State, at the ex- pense and on the responsibility of the Government. In the former Mr. Sparks received his compensation as editor, and the Government furnished the materials. In the latter pub- 31 lication there has been another editor, and the " actual cost" has been in some degree diminished. In the contemplated publication by the subscribers, they are to be at the entire expense of collecting, arranging, and editing the great mass of material employed. Their proposal also embraces a copious index to each volume, of which both the other works referred to are destitute^ and the cost of the work must of course be proportionally enhanced. In arranging the terms of the contract with the Secretary of State, a doubt has occurred to his mind whether he is not pre- cluded from allowing any other or higher price for our " work" than the minimum price fixed by Congress — whether that should be the cost of the work " now printing" or " heretofore printed," (being Sparks's edition.) Our opinion is that he may exercise his discretion under the circumstances, so as to allow a price not exceeding the actual cost, in proportion, of Mr. Sparks's publication, and not falling short, in his allowance, of the cost of the Diplomatic Correspond- ence " now printing." There is a small difference in the cost of the two works, Sparks's edition being the highest. This difference we desire to be allowed, inasmuch as in our work we advance the funds and incur the responsibility ; in the others, the Government did so. Mr. Livingston has been so good as to suggest the propriety of asking your opinion on this question, and has expressed his wil- lingness to be guided by it. With his sanction, then, as will appear by his within approval, we beg leave to submit this question to you, and to inquire whe- ther, under the act of Congress in question, the Secretary of State may not lawfully contract with us for our " work" at the same rate which the first series of the Diplomatic Correspond- ence, edited by Mr. Sparks, cost. A professional friend has suggested to us to request your at- tention to the language of the Supreme Court of the United States in the first volume of Peters's Reports, pages 565 566 on the subject of commissions allowed to executors, &c. All which is most respectfully submitted to you, by Your obedient servants, M. ST. CLAIR CLARKE. PETER FORCE. Roger B. Taney, Esq. Attorney General. I approve of the above statement. EDWARD LIVINGSTON. 32 The language of the law leaves the question in so much doubt, that I think it most advisable not to exceed the minimum price. R. B. TANEY. 3Iarch 23, 1833. Thus then our allowance was fixed at ^2 20 per octavo volume. The Secretary required of us copious indexes, and, as there was none in either of the works referred to in the act, he allowed us eleven cents per volume for an index, taking as his estimate the cost of an index for the " American State Papers" printing by Gales and Seaton, amounting to ^2 31 per octavo volume, or four mills and a quarter per page. Having determined, as the act authorized him, that the edition should be folio, and that each page should contain four times the amount of matter, on precisely the same type, the allowance per page was seventeen mills. From papers in the Department of State, the Secretary will find that the printing of the work taken as the standard of allow- ance was paid for at Congress prices, and that, before the first account was approved of, the bill was referred to the Secretary of the Senate and Clerk of the House of Representatives, upon whose corrections the account was adjusted, and all accounts sub- sequently paid. Of what items, then, is our allowance composed ? Printing at Congress prices ; binding at the same ; the actual cost of copying in the Department of State, with the item o( cost of indexes : not one cent is allowed, as in Sparks's case, for editorial labor. We are obliged to seek for the material, and incur the heavy expenses of travel, &c. For the standard work, it was at hand and furnished. We have to advance large suras of money in procuring the material ; for the other, these advances were made by the De- partment. We feel the deep anxiety and responsibility of editors ; in the other case, there was none. From this explanation, we think it will appear that the work is doing as cheaply as it could be required ; and the appropriations being extended through many years, cannot be burdensome to the public treasury. These remarks and references have extended far beyond what we at first contemplated. As we progressed, they appeared to be called for. We desire to stand " rectus in curia," and especially that our statements and views shall be such as to meet the appro- bation of the honorable Secretary of State, and enable him satis- factorily to discharge his duty in making his report to the Con- gress of the United States. 38 With great respect, we have the honor to subscribe ourselves your most obedient, humble servants, M. ST. CLAIR CLARKE. PETER FORCE. Washington, October 10, 1834. The following letters from the Secretary of State, Secretary of War, and Attorney General, were given, at our request, previous to our examination of the several States. The letter of Mr. Adams was written two years before. Department of State, Washington, 9th April, 1833. Gentlemen : When I first heard of your intention to publish the Documentary History of the United States, I was deeply impress- ed with its importance. A better acquaintance with your plan, and more mature reflection on its utility, enable me now to add that I think it a most useful work for establishing the history of our country on its true basis. Already the fugitive documents relat- ing to our colonial state, and to the interesting struggle for our independence, begin to disappear. The most careless observer must have remarked how soon papers in the hands of every one, while the important events to which they relate are recent — how soon they vanish from the public eye, and with what difficulty, after the lapse of only a few yearsj they can be discovered. And even documents which, from their nature, seem to promise a more durable existence, scarcely form an exception. Carelessness and conflagrations, loss by frequent removals and natural decay, all concur to prevent the archives of the country from being a source to which the historian can apply for authentic information, with any certain hope of success. The want of a general place of de- posite for historical documents, and the strange refusal of Congress to provide the means of arranging and indexing those which ex- ist in the archives of the State Department, add to the difiiculty, and enhance the value of your undertaking. Although much has been lost, there is no doubt that there still are among the records of the Atlantic States, and in the hands of individuals, most precious materials for the history of the country, and the biography of its most distinguished citizens, which, un- less collected now, may be irretrievably lost. The press is the only means of making them imperishable. Once embodied in a work like that which you contemplate, they will be dispersed among so many private libraries and public institutions as to bid defiance to accident- The magazine of facts will for- 5 34 ever be accessible, and the means of acquiring a true knowledge of the origin, nature, and operations of our Government will be open to our posterity at the remote period to which all our hopes and prayers carry its existence. It is not only to the gratification of the pride or curiosity of our posterity (laudable as they are) that your collection is to minister. It will serve a higher purpose. Fifty years have not yet elapsed since the formation of our National Government, and already the great principles on which it was founded are forgotten, or misre- presented, or unknown. Facts are distorted to suit party purposes, and an honest, intelligent people are deceived, because the means of correcting error are not within their reach. But place in their hands the documentary evidence of what we were in our colonial state ; of the union by which we achieved our indepen- dence ; of the defect of that system ; of the means by which the ad- mirable structure of our constitution was raised. Let them read, not in the distorted, turgid language of party writers of the present day, but in the lucid arguments of the sages who deliberated on the formation, the adoption, and the first movements of the Gov- ernment ; let them draw from that source, fact, and truth, and sound argument, and they can never be made the instruments of political parties, or designing demagogues. Go on, then, gentlemen, with your important work ; hasten its publication ; every volume that appears will destroy some error, or establish some political truth. You greatly overrate the value of, or necessity for, my recom- mendation. No State will refuse to you the examination of its re- cords, and there are few individuals who will not gladly commu- nicate to you such family papers as show the part their ancestors acted in the past times which your work is intended to illustrate. I am, with respect. Your most obedient servant, EDW. LIVINGSTON. M. St. Clair Clarke, Esq. and P. Force, Esq. Copy of a Utter from Lewis Cass to M. St. Clair Clarke. Washington, April 18, 1833. Sir : I have received your letter of the 13th instant, and have read, with much satisfaction, the accompanying plan upon which you and Mr. Force propose to publish a Documentary History of the United States. 35 Such a compilation is an object interesting to our country, and if executed, as I have no doubt it will be, with judgment and fide- lity, will be a most valuable repository — a repository which no other nation possesses, containing the most authentic materials for history from the earliest period of our settlement, and exhibiting the whole course of our Governments, Colonial, State, and Fede- ral, together with those contemporaneous opinions, statements, and expositions which are so necessary to a full comprehension of the subject, and which yet, in other countries, so seldom meet the public eye. Unless these are soon collected, and placed in safety by the imperishable power of the press, they will be irretrievably lost, and with them will be lost the true knowledge of many of the most eventful scenes of our history. These documents are now buried in the public archives, or dispersed among various indivi- duals through the country. Their compilation will render them accessible to all, and no one can be indifferent to the success of a work which promises so many lessons of wisdom derived from the experience of the past, and to be applied to the objects of the future. Very respectfully, I have the honor to be. Your most obedient servant, LEW. CASS. M. St. Clair Clarke, Esq. Milledgeville, Georgia. Copy of a letter from R. B. Taney to M. St. Clair Clarke. Washington, April 15, 1833. Dear Sir : The Documentary History of the United States, in which you are engaged, is a work so much to be desired, that I presume you will experience no difficulty in obtaining access to any papers in public offices, or in the hands of individuals, which may enable you to accomplish your undertaking in the most per- fect manner. Every citizen will take an interest in preserving the documents you propose to collect ; and I take pleasure in ex- pressing my cordial approbation of your plan, and will readily affi)rd you any aid in my power to promote its successful exe- cution. I am, dear sir, very respectfully. Your obedient servant, R. B. TANEY. 36 Extract from a letter of John Q. Adams to Matthew St. Clair Clarke, Washington. QuiNCY, nth August, 1831. Dear Sir: **** I should hope that octavo is the form upon which you will fix, with Mr. Force, for the collection of what once were called the prior documents, and for those contained in the Remembrancer, with others of the same character, down to the adoption of the constitution of the United States. The men of the present age are under a sacred obligation, both to that which has past, and that which is to come, to preserve the recorded vir- tues of their forefathers for the instruction and emulation of their posterity ; nor shall they be unremembered who assume upon them- selves to perform this duty for their contemporaries. Receive, with Mr. Force, my thanks for engaging in the enterprise, and my best wishes that you may both live to witness its accomplish- ment, and to be duly rewarded for it. With much respect, I am, dear sir. Your obedient servant, J. Q. ADAMS. The following is part of the material copied in the Department of State : Letters A, 1777 to 1789. B, 1777 to 1778. 1779 to 1781. 1782 to 1789. C, December 16, 1775, to December 18, 1780. 1781 to 1789. D, 1777 to 1780. 1781 to 1789. E, October, 1776, to 25th December, 1789. F, 1777 to 1789. G, 1777 to 1780. H, January 4, 1777, to February 16, 1780. 1780 to 1789. K, December 7, 1776, to May 25, 1789. L, January 26, 1778, to August 13, 1786. M, 1777 to 1789. P, 1777 to 1789. R, 1777 to 1789. S, 1782 to 1789. 37 T, 1777 to 1789. W, 1777 to 1789. U,V, Y, Z, 1777 to 1789. Letters, New Hampshire, 1775 to 1787. Massachusetts, December 30, 1776, to Sept. 1781. Rhode Island, 1777 to 1787. Connecticut, 1777 to 1789. New York, 1777 to 1788. New Jersey, February 3, 1777, to 1788. Pennsylvania, 1777 to 1789. Delaware, 1777 to 1789. Maryland, 1777 to 1789. Virginia, 1775 to 1789. North Carolina, 1777 to 1789. South Carolina, 1777 to 1778. Georgia, 1777 to 1787. Memorials, A, 1777 to — . Petitions, B. Memorials, B. Memorials, D. Reports of Committees on Post Office, 1776 to 1788. on App. of Ind, W. 1775-1784. Washington's letters. Vol. 1, July, 1775, to May, 1776. 2, June 3, 1776, to September 18, 1776. 3, 4, September 19, 1776, to August 27, 1777. 5, August 28, 1777, to May 1, 1778. 6, May to December, 1778. 7, December 16, 1778, to September 11, 1779. 8, September 13, 1779, to July 10, 1780. 9, July, 1780, to February, 1781. 10, February 26, 1781, to September 16, 1782. 11, October, 1782, to January, 1784. Gates's letters, July, 1775, to June, 1778. June 21, 1778, to August, 1782. Schuyler's letters, 1, 2, 3, January 28, 1775, to June 12, 1785. Arnold, U775 to 1781, Starke, Armstrong, Sterlin*'" Heath,'july 21, 1775, to July 19, 1782. Clinton, Nixon, j^ j^^g ^^ j^gg Nicola, Harraar, 38 Greene, 1, July 8, 1776, to March 10, 1781. 2, March, 1781, to August, 1785. Knox, 1, April, 1785, to October, 1786. 2, October 5, 1786, to September 29, 1787. 3, November, 1787, to July, 1788. R. Howe, ) jyj^j.^j^ j^ j^^g ^^ November 9, 1779. J. Sullivan, 5 - Canada Papers, ) j*^q j^i^g Sullivan's Expedition, &c. ) ' Moultrie, April, 1778, to February, 1782. Lincoln, March, 1777, to August, 1789. Wooster, July, 1775, to December, 1776. Montgomery, October, 1775, to January, 1776. Charles Lee, January, 1776, to October, 1780. McDougal, January, 1776, to March, 1781. Wayne, February, 1776, to August, 1789. St. Clair, January, 1776, to January, 1783. Mifflin, November, 1776, to January, 1780. Parsons, December, 1777, to August, 1779. Spencer, November, 1777, to December, 1777. Steuben, December, 1777, to August, 1789. De Kalb, August, 1777, to September, 1779. Armand, December, 1777, to January, 1786. Smallwood, January, 1778, to June, 1782. Pulaski, March, 1778, to August, 1779. Dupatail, December, 1778, to November, 1781. D'Estaing's letters, July, 1778, to September, 1778. Ethan Allen, March, 1781. Letters and Reports of Committees, 1775 to 1789. Reports, Board of War, 1, 1776 to 1778. 2, April, 1778 to Dec. 1779. 3, 1779. December 1779 to Dec. 1780. March to June, 1781. Lincoln, Secretary of War, November 26, 1781 to 1783. June, 1783, to Nov. 1783. Letters of Board of War, 1780, 1781, Reports of Board of War, vol. 6, 1781. Feb. 27, 1777, to Jan. 6, 1788. Nov. 18, 1780, to Aug. 13, 1783. Letters from States, 1775, 1776. alphabetical, 1775, 1776. Letters from Laurens, Pierce, Palfrey, Blaine, 1778 to 1783. Committee to treat with Six Nations of Indians, 1775. Letters from Secret Committee, 1776. Committee at Philadelphia, 1776, 1777. TTK ^^«- 39 Letters from Paul Jones, Robert Morris, &c. 1776. Committee at head quarters, 1780. Reports and letters of Robert Morris, 3 vols. 1781-'4. H. Laurens, President, 2 vols. Nov. 1777, to Dec. 8, 1778. J. Jay and S. Huntington, Dec. 11, 1778, to May 19, 1780. S. Huntington, May 19, 1780, to May 20, 1781. Presidents of Congress, 1781 to 1787. Reports, Board of Treasury, 1776, 1777. 1778. 1779. 1780. Jan. 2, 1781, to Sept. 13, 1781. Feb. 14, 1785, to Dec. 16, 1786. May 14, 1785, to Sept. 11, 1788. Letters of Board of Treasury, 1785 to 1788. Reports of Treasury on App. of individuals, A to J. Reports of the Committee. Reports of Committees relating to Congress. Carleton, relative to Captain Huddy. Reports of Committees, 1781 to 1787. Reports of Treasury on App. of States, &c. 1784 to 1789. Estimates of receipts, expenditures, and taxes, &c. from 1781 to 1787. Letters and Reports of Committees, 1775 to 1779. Pay, &c. of army, August 1, 1780, to December 31, 1780. Charles Thompson's letter-book A, November 20, 1799, to October 7, 1785. Memorials and petitions, A to G, 1775, 1776. H to W, 1775, 1776. Reports of Committees, A, C. on App. of individuals, H to L. fW?^- c ^^fh: -^^ .> V \f. 0^ » ^ * "^ > J v •7- .^vJ"'.. i^:^', ^ ^. ^^ ;^%v^ ::^^:^/ 0-/ xO■n^. i: '^'^-il ■5; l ^Ov-j, <-^ % ^^^^^ ■^-.^^ CJ <• c.^ ^.^^fA ^ i. » ft ."^^r Hq. I , DOBBSBROS. . V-^ I LIBRARy EINOING - *$- \^ s • * , ^,^^ ( -> -'i'f^" .0^ 4' ^ » ■J^ s- -,^,,. .^^% "''^. % -b V^ LIBRARY OF CONGRESS v\ II II r t II i 011 699 364 8