j/t-LC f\JUC^(n.ci A tXxJL {{sLk^AJrtc COynX yudnAuj \n ^. ZviAytrXA-^CX^ "Is- Class _E_S16__ Book if^A^ ^L. "HJ. 'Mu^ JSl.^ THIS IREOOiRIDI THE REPUBLICAN PARTY vs. THE FALSE DEMOCRACY! " Cur cause must be entrusted to, and conducted by, | !t8 own undouJbted friends — those whose hands are free, i whose hearts are in the work, who do care for the re- ».ull."'— A. Lincoln^ I " This is a world of compensation, and ho who would t>€ no slavo must consent to /lave no slave. Those who deny freedom to others deserve itnotfor themselves, and mder a just God cannot long retain it." — A. Lincoln. THE REPUBLICAX PARTV. The Republican party was organized to resist the encroachments of slavery, pre- serve the Union, and promote the develop- ment of the resources of the country and the material prosperity of the people. In the platform adopted j^ Philadelphia in lb56 by the first NationarKepublican Con- vention, this resolution was embodied : ''Resolved, That the maintenance of the ! rinciples promulgated in the Declaration of Independence, and embodied in the Fed- eral Constitution, is essential to the pres- ervation of our republican institutions, and that the Federal Constitution, the rights of ;he States, and the Union of the States shall be preserved.'" The same Convention declared that it was the duty of the Federal Government ■ secure to all its citizens the rights of life, :berty, and the pursuit of happiness ; that Congress was endowed with sovereign power in all the Territories ; that slavery should be prohibited therein, and in favor of the construction of the Pacific railroad and the improvement of rivers and harbors, to the end, that the lives and property of Citizens be rendered secure, eomm'f'rco pro- moted, and the great natural resources of the country developed. PLATPOEM OF 1S60. The great Convention at Chicago in 1860 reiterated the declarations of 1856— the principles embodied in the Declaration of independence, the freedom of the Territo- ries, the inviolability of citizenship, the equality of all men before the law— and re- asserted the duty and power of the Federal Government to protect and develop the commerce and resources of the whole country by works of national importance, and to provide homesfeads upon the public domain for all of the laboring masses wh* may desire to settle and cultivate the same. now THESE PROMISES HAVE P.EEN REDEEMED . 1st. — The Preservation of the Union. — So .soon as it was settled ' that Abraham Lincoln, the Republican candidate, had been elected, the Democracy from one end of the Union to the other 'declared for the dis- solution of the Government. The Southern conspiracy was i-mmediately organized, with the declared purpose of overthrowing the Constitution, and in this the conspira- tors were encouraged by the Kemocrutic lead- ers and press in all the Northern States. State after .State, under the lead of Soutli- ern Democrats, abetted and encouraged by their Northern allies, withdrew from the National Congress and set up an indepen- dent and hostile confederacy. So that, when Mr. Lincoln acceded to power, the Union was practically broken and war ac- tually inaugurated, the armies of the Re- public dispersed or quartered in hostile territory under treasonable leaders, the national vessels disarmed or placed upon distant stations, and the Southern arsenals and forts, with few exceptions, subjected to the power of the enemy. In fact, all had been done by the traitorous Democracy which power and treason could accompli.?h or suggest to destroy the Union and bmld up a rival and hostile Government. Such was the legacy bequeathed by the Democracy to the incoming Republican Administration. In his inaugural address, Mr. Lincoln, true to the platform upon which he had been nominated and elected, declared firmly, that the Union nf tiie States would be pre- :y every measure in his power, every prop-r Attempt at the reconstruction of the States lately in rebellion; who has perverted the public patronage into an engine of wholesale cor- ruption, and who has been justly impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and prop'jrly pronounced guitlythereofby the vote ot 30 Senators. 9. The doctrine of Great Britain and other European powers, that because a man is once a subject he is always so, must be re- sisted at every hazard by the United States, as a relic of the feudal times, not author- ized by the law of nations, and at war with our national honor and independence. Na- turalized citizens are entitled to be protect- ed in all their rights of citizenship as though they were native born, and no citizen of the United States, native or naturalized, must be liable to arrest and imprisonment by any foreign power for acts done or words spoken in this country ; and if so arrested and im- prisoned, it is the duty of the Government to interfere in his behalf 10. Of all who were faithful in the trials of the late war, there were none entitled to more especial honor than the brave soldiers and seamen who endivred the hardships of campaign and cruise and imperiled their lives in the service of the country ; the boun- ties and pensions provided by the laws for these brave defenders of the nation are ob- ligations never to be forgotten ; the widows aud orphans of the gallant dead are the wards of the people, a sacred legacy be- queathed to the nation's protecting care. 11. Foreign emigration— which in the past has added so much to the wealth, devel- opment, and resources and increase of power to this nation, the asylum of the oppressed of all nations— should be fostered and en- couraged by a liberal and just policy. 12. This Convention declares itself in sympathy with all the oppressed people which are struggling for their rights. ADDITIONAL UESOLCTIOXS. Iiesoh-ed, That we highly commend the spirit of magnanimity and forbearance with which the men who have served in the re- bellion, but now frankly and honestly co- operate with us in restoring the country and reconstructing the Southern State govern- ments upon the basis of impartial justice and equal rights, are received back into the communion of the loyal people ; and we favor the removal of the disqualifications and restrictions placed upon the late rebels in the same measure as their spirit of loy- alty will direct, and as may be consistent with the safety of the loyal people. Resolved, That we recognize the great principles laid down in the immortal Decla- ration of Independence as the true founda- tion of democratic government, and we hail with gladness every effort toward making these principles a living reality on every incS of American soil. 6 LETTER OF GEN. U. S. GRANT Accepting the Republican Nomination. Washington, D. C, May 29, 1868." General Jos. R. Eawley, President Na- tional Union Republican Convention : In formally accepting the nomination of the National Union Republican Convention of the 21st of May inst., it seems proper that some statement of views beyond the mere acceptance of the nomination should be expressed. The proceedings of the Con- vention were marked with wisdom, modera- tion, and patriotism, and I believe express the feelings of the great mass of those who When a great rebellion wjiich imperiled the national existence was at last over- thrown, the duty of all others devolving on those intrusted with the responsibilities of legislation evidently was, to require that the revolted States should be readmitted to participation in the Government against which they had warred, only on such a basis as to increase and fortify, not to weaken or endanger, the strength of the nation. Certainly no one ought to have claimed that they should be readmitted under such rules that their organizations as States could ever again be used, as ; the opening of the war, to def3^ the n tional authority or to destroy the national unity. This principle has been the pola e' 'I sustained the country through its recent star' of those who have inflexibly insisted trials. I endorse their resolutions. . on the Congressional policy your Conven- If elected to the office of President of tion so cordially indorsed, the United States it will be my endeavor b^qj^j ^^ executive opposition and per- to admmister all the laws m good faith, g-^^^^^^ refusals to accept any plan of re- with economy and with the view of giving peace, quiet, and protection everywhere. In times like the present it is impossible, or at least eminently improper, to lay down a policy to be adhered to right or wrong through an administration of four years. New political issues not foreseen are con- stantly arising ; the views of the public on old ones are constantly changing, and a purely administrative officer should always be left free to execute the will of the people. I always have respected that will and always shall. Peace and universal prosperity, its se- quence, with economy of administration, will lighten the burden of taxation, while it constantly reduces the national debt. Let us have peace. With great respect, your obedient servant, U. S. GRANT. LETTER OF SCHUYLER COLFAX Accepting the Republican Nominhtion. Washington, D. C, May 30, 1868. Hon. J. R. Haioley, President of the Na- tional Union Republican C^onvention : Dear Sir ; The platform adopted by the patriotic Convention over which you pre- sided, and the resolutions which so happily , „ , supplement it, so entirely agree with my | soil where they first saw the light construction proffered by Congress, justice and public safety at last combined to teach us that only by an enlargement uf suffrage in those States could the desired end be attained, and that it was even more sale to give the ballot to those who loved the Union than to those who had sought icef- fectually to destroy it. The assured sac-, cess of this legislatiou is being written en the adamant of history, and will be our triumphant vindication. More clearly, too, than ever before does the nation now recognize that the greatest ,, glory of a republic is that it throws tfce shield of its protection over the humblest and the weakest of its people, and vina> cates the rights of the poor and the povver- less as faithfully as those of the rich atd the powerful. I rejoice, too, in this Conven- tion to tind in your platform the frank and fearless avowal that the naturalized citizea must be protected abroad " at every haz- ard as though they were native boru." Our whole peoi)le are foreigners or descendants of foreigners. Our fathers established by arms their right to be called a nation : it remains for us to establish the right U) wel- come to our shores all who are wiliirji^ by oaths of allegiance to become Amencau citizens. Perpetual allegiance, as claimed abroad, is only another name for perpetua,! bondage, and would make all slaves to the Our views as to a just national policy, that my thanks are due to the delegates as much for this clear and auspicioits declaration of principles as for the nomination with which I have been honored, and which I gratefully accept. national cemeteries prove how faithfully these oaths of fidelity to their adopted land have been sealed in the life blood of thou- sands upon thousands. Should we then be faithless to the dead if we did not pro- tCjCt their living brethren in the enjoyment; of that nationality for which, side by side | with the native born, our soldiers of for- j eign birth laid down their lives? It was fitting, too, that the representa- | tivefi of a party which had proved so true to national dnty in time of war, should I speak so clearly in time of peace for the | mainteuanee untarnished of national honor, national credit and good faith, as regards ; i:s debt, the cost of our national existence. | <" r do not need to extend this reply by fur- 1 tlier comment on a platform which has j elicited such hearty approval throughout , the land; the debt of gratitude itacknowl- 1 edires to the brave men who saved the Union | from destruction; the frank approval of j amnesty based on repentance and loyalty; the demand for the most thorough economy and honesty in the Government; the sympa- thv of the party of liberty with all through- out the world who long for the liberty we here enjoy and the recognition of the sub- lime principles of the Declaration of_ Inde- pendence are worthy of the organization on whose banners they are to be written in the coming contest. Its past record can- not be blotted out or forgotten. If there had been no llepublican party slavery would to-day cast its baleful shadow over the Republic. If there had been no Re- publican party a free press and free speech would be as unknown from the Potomac to the Rio Grande as ten years ago. If the Republican party could have been stricken from existence when the banner of the re- bellion was unfurled, and when the response of "no coercion'' was heard at the North, we would have had no nation to-day. But for the Republican party daring to risk the odium of tax and draft laws, our flag could not have been kept flying on the field till the long-looked for victory came. "Without a Republican party the Civil Rights bill, the guarantee of equality under the law to the humble and the defenceless, as well ad to tlie strong, would not be to-day upon our national statute book. With such inspirations from the past, and following the example of the founders of the Republic, who called the victorious General of the Revolution to preside over the land his triumphs had saved from its enemies, I cannot doubt that our labors will be crowned with success, and it will be a Success that will bring restored hope, confidence, prosperity, and progress — South as well as North, West as well as East — and, above all, the blessings, under Provi- dence, of national concora and peace. Very truly yours, SCHUYLER COLFAX. RECORD No. 2. DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES, 1863- It will be seen by a careful perusal of the platform of principles adopted by the Republican Convention which nom- inated Grant and Colfax, that there is a firm adherence to the policy and measures which have repeatedly received the sanc- tion of the American people. That the loyal State governments which have been organized in pursuance of law are to be maintained, the basis of equal rights before the law to be adhered to, thd puljlic faith at home and abroad to be strictly observed, the burden of the na- tional debt reduced as rapidly as the re- sources of the country will permit, the corruptions fostered by a recreant Execu- tive exposed and reformed, the rights of American citizens at home and abroad to be protected and defended, the obligations of the nation to its heroic defenders to be redeemed, foreign emigration invited, the principles of the Declaration of Indepen- dence made effective, and the right-hand of fellowship to be extended to all those lately in rebellion, who have honestly and earnestly aided the work of restoration on principles of impartial justice and in ac- cordance with the loyal sentiment of the nation. THE LETTERS OF ACCEPTANCE. The letters of General Grant and Hon. Schuyler Col/ax accepting the Republican nomination, are models of brevity and pa- triotism. They give forth no uncertain sound. They are a square acceptance of the principles of the Republican party, and an unqualified declaration that the will of the nation will be respected. No per- sonal or Presidential policy is to be inter- posed to thwart the expressed will of the people. These letters should be read by every Republican. They contain no unmeaning phrases, designed to deceive the people. They will bear the same construction in every section of the country, and therefore are such as become the national candidates of a great national party. THE CANDIDATES. For President, U. S, Grant. The candidate of the Republican party for President, G^eral U. S. Grant, was selected with greater unanimity than has been any Other candidate for the same ofi&ce since the days of Washington. His was 8 not the nomination of a caucus or conven- tion, but the choice of the loyal people. The members of the Convention -who nom- inated General Grant but gave expression to the positive instructions with which they were charged. lie accepts the place and promises to discharg'e the duties in obedience to the popular judgment. lie was not chosen to reward him for the great service he had rendered the country, but because the country requires his services in the place to which he has been nominated, and will be chosen. To quiet the turbulence of unrepentant rebels, allay the spirit of discord engendered by the war, give peace and security to the whole country, establish justice, secure economy in the administration of the Gov- ernment, stability and prosperity to all the industrial interests of the nation, allay the intensity of party strife, and discover and develop the great material resources of the country, requires at this time, not a mere partizan, but a man of firm purposes, of unostentatious demeanor, of inflexible tena- city and of unquestioned patriotism ; one in whom all sections may confide, whom loyal men may trust and rebels and dis- organizers fear and respect. Because Gen. Grant possesses those qualities in a high degree, unstained by mere partizanship and untarnished by mistakes or blunders in the discharge of public trusts, ho has been se- lected •, and because the people can confide in him, he will bf- elected. It is not mili- tary renown, but solid and reliable states- manship, that has placed him in the front at this time. It was not the preference of politicians, but the exigencies of country which led the people to demand the nomi- nation of G^e?t. Grant. The same unerring popular judgment which conducted the na- tion to triumph over the rebellion, has de- manded that the consequences of the national success shall inure to the country, and that the national destiny shall bo entrusted to "its own undoubted friends, whose hands arc free, whose hearts are in the work, who do care for the result," and who in peace as in war can command success. It is not by words but by works that Gen. Grant is known. It is by works that he is to be elected, by works that his duty is to be performed, by works that peace and safety, and liberty, and justice are to be secured. Ey the same sign which gave success in the Held — the united and determined sup- port of all loyal men-»-will victory be won in the forum. The same issues arc involved in the contest. Substantially the same leaders are arrayed on either side, acu. as the people rally to the standard of the iuet or the unjust, will victory or defeat come lo the respective standard "bearers. For Vice President, Sclmyhrr Colfa.:. \ Here we have a pure, an ineorru|):il;Ie 1 statesman. One who by his industry, hi^ ability, and his devotion to the cause cf tho country has won the confidence and respfcr of the American people. By no act cr' violence will the enemies of the couttry seek to bring this unflinching patriot to the head of the Government. His recti-d 's unblemislied, his character unquestko' cl, and his success undoubted. Ileis emphui- -i cally the representative of the younger ixd ij more ardent of the Republican phalans. * Thus, with a record in defense of liberty unimpcached, covered with honors in Sup- port of the Union, with all its measures j fully endorsed and its policy fully san:- j tioned by the people, the Eepublican party ' enters "upon the contest with its old and oft-defeated opponents, led by candidates I who, under favorable or unfavorable cir- 1 cumstances, have always achieved success. As in the past, it contends, now for the unity and perpetuity of the nation, for hu- man rights, and for the mental and mate- rial development of the country and its people. Its opponents, on the contrary, are led by the late enemies of the nation, contending for the mastry with the avowed purpose of defeating the restoration of the States and re-establishing a hated despi t- ism based upon race, and which is detri- mental alike to the masses of the people c f every race, and fatal to human rights ..nd progress in every clime. Between -v.ch opposing forces no patriot can hesitate. Not to act is to shamefully submit t > de- feat, and not to act with the Republican party, is to aid in erecting a despotism of class upon the broken and scattered frag- ments of a defeated Itarbarism, which is covered with crime and fresh from the as- sault upon the national life. No glowing promises which the Democratic party ^v.il now make, can wipe off the record of liood which its leaders have graven upon the hearts of the people. With the massacres of Fort Pillow, Andersouvllle, Saulsb-.ry, Belle Isle, and New Orleans iascribed upo . their standard, the Democracy and the r rebel allies will plead in vain for Uic sop- port of loyal liberty-loving men. The des- tinies of the nation cannot now be cntru.sted to hands reeking with the blood of loyal victims. PRINTED AT TIIK OFFICE OF THE GREAT ifkpCBI.TC, WASHINGTOX, D. C, :regoi^3D jsro. 2. DEMOCRATIC PROFESSIONS "VS. DEMOCRATIC PRACTICE. THEIR PARTY AND' PLATFORM REVIEWED. Published I7 the Union Repnlilicaa Congressional Gommittoo, "Wastiugton, D, C. The time waa, v.-1icq Vim Deiuocratic party was a party of progress and principles; but even priorto the rebellion, it bad long since out-lived its usefulness. Following the ex- ample of Jefferson, Madison and a host of the earliei' statesmen and patriots, the Demo- cratic party contributed largely to the ad- vancement of the principlc-s of republican government, and the security of individual rights; but, when it threvr aside the armor of liberty, ignored and derided the great truths enunciated in the Declaration of In- dependence, and embraced the rotten and despotic theories of Calhoun, Rhett, Toombs, Yancey, SJidell, and their co-conspirators, the great party itself, became a conspiracy; not only against the Union of the States, but also against the liberty of man. When it declared, through its leader:^, for the di- vinity of slavery, it became the foe of lib- erty — and the advocate and slave of dts- potism. From the time it ceased to honor its great statesmen, and commenced to re- ward only the truculent tools of a corrupt and despotic leadership, it became the enemy 01 liberty — the implacable opponent of the Union. It consented, in 1860, to its own disruption at Charleston and Baltimore, that the foundation for the dissolution of the Union might be securely laid. The power of the Union to protect and preserve liberty wa.s the only source of its offense to the Democratic leaders. Fear- ipg the exercise of that power by the Re- publicans, they organized rebellion and sought to e:-tablish a Government v/hosc cornerstone should be tslavcry, and the Vi'h'jle structure of which should consist of states torn from the national Union. Singly and by pairs and squads the Demo- cratic leaders of the South, in tho legisla- tive and executive departments of the GovernmeHt, boldly, defiantly marched out of the high places they had betrayed and dishonored, not only unrebuked, but cheered and encouraged by their Northern allies. Not a man but was a Democrat went into rebellion ; not a man but was a Democrat sympathised with or aided re- bellion. The rebellion was, in its concep-* tion and progress, a Democratic measure, inaugurated^ advocated, conducted, de- fended, and supported by none but Demo- crats. Its purpose was the esta])]ishment of a slave empire. Its advocates held that capital should owu labor, that slavery was a divine institution. Upon such theories and for guch pur- poses was the Democratic party, by the voluntary action of its leaders, dissolved, and the war for the disrnptipn of the Union entered wpon with the approval of these loaders in every section of the country. At tho first National Convention of the Democratic party after the inauguration of rebellion — at Chicago, in 18G4 — the Dem- ocratic leaders, though separated from their Southern allies by pending hostilities, did not fail to express their syjnpathv with their old allies, declare the war lor the preservation of the Union a failure, and the restoration of tho Union as it tvas tho only road to peace. Strange to say, the same leaders who made, conducted, and consented to the re- bellion still control the Democratic party. They were the ruling power in the national nomiuatingConvention recently assembled, tLld toKuX and succeeded in forcing upon the party, candidates and a platform pledged to re newal of strife, even to war, if need be, in the interest of the defeated authors of the rebellion, and ^Yilh the avowed purpose of restoring to its control men fresh from an assault upon the natiouval life. Can any further evidence be required of the utter unfitness of the Democratic party under its present leadership to rule the country. True, these wily and unprincipled lead- ers have, in the platform adopted by their 4th of July Convention made some specious promises. But what are their promises worth ? Their whole political career is but a schedule of violated pledges and unmean- ing pretensions. As actions are a better index than words to the purposes of men, let us test the promises of these leaders by their practice; compare their words with their actions, leaving to honest men the conclusions. The late Democratic Convention, which selected as its candidates Horatio Seymour and Frank P. Blair, commences its plat- form with the following declarations: " The Democratic party, in National Con- vention assembled, reposing its trust in the intelligence, patriotism, and discriminating justice of the people, standing upon the Constitution as the foundation and limita- tion of the pov/ers of the Government, and the guaranty of tlie liberties of the citizen, and recognizing the questions of slavery and secession as having been settled, for all time to come, by the war or the voluntary action of the Southern States in Constitutional Con- ventions assembled, and never to be renewed or reagitated, do, with the return of peace, demand — ''First. Immediate restoration of all the States to their rights in the Union, under the Constitution, and of civil government to the American people- ''Second. Amnesty for all past political offences, and the regulation of the elective franchise in the States by their citizens," Hero v.'o hare, 1st. The stereotyped declaratioaof devotion to the Constitution by a body of men, one-third of whom are fresh from a four years' war against the Constitution, and the other tvro-thirdg of whom fully sympathized with efforts to overthrow the Government. What faith can be placed in the pretended veneration of such men as Hampton, For- rest, Vallandigbam, Seymour, and Clymer, and the other leaders of that Convention, ail of whom either Tought against the Con- stitution, or remaining in safe places, ex- erted all their povrcr and influence to de- feat the efforts of the Government for its preservation ? 2d. A simple recognition that with thc5 downfall of the rebellion, slavery actually perished, but there is no acceptance of the logical consequences which follow the ex- tinction of slavery. The freed people are wholly ignored. Slavery abolished and the right of seces- sion still maintained. These are all the re- sults of the war as understood by the Democ- racy. In all other respects the States are, as they were, to be held in the iron grasp of a governing class, a privileged aristocracy, who are to lord it over 5,000,000 of the subject race, and retain in ignorance and degradation all of their own race not mem- bers of the favored class. That is, the 300,000 old slave masters, who made and conducted the rebellion, are to take posses- sion of the conquered States and people and run the Government machine in the old groove. LET THEIR WITNESSES TESTIFV. Tliat the purpose of the Democracy is, to destroy the reconstructed State govern- ments, and restore the rebel leaders to power and control — let their candidates, and the men who controlled their conven- tion witness: [Extracts from letter of Frank P. Blair, June 30, 18GS J "The Reconstruction policy of the radicals will be complete before the next election: the States, so long back excluded will have been admitted ; negro suffrage established, and the carpet-baggers installed in their seats in both branches of Congress. There is no possibility of changing the political character of the Senate, even if the Demo- crats should elect their President and a ma- jority of the popular branch of Congress. We cannot, therefore, undo the radical plan of reconstruction by Congressional action; the Senate will continue a bar to its repeal. Must we submit to it? IIow can it b«i over- thrown ? It can only be overthrown by the authority of the Executive, who is sworn to maintain the Constitution, and who will fail to do his duty if he allows the Constitution to perish uuder a series of Congressional en- actments which arc in palpable violation of its fundamental-principles. "If the President elected by the Democ- racy enforces or permits others to enforce these reconstruction acts, the radicals by the accession of twenty .spurious Senators and fifty Representatives, will control both branches of Congress, and his administra- tion will be as powerless as the present one of Mr. Joliuson. ^^ There is hut one jcay to restore the Gov- ernment and the Constitution, and that is for the President-elect to declare these acts null and void, compel the army to undo its tisurpa- iions at the South, disj)C7'se the carpetbag State governments, allow the uhite people to reorganize their own governments, and elect Senators and Eepresentatives, The House of Xcprcsentatives icill contain a major it }j of Democrats from the North, and the;/ iciU ad- mit the Eejn-esentativcs elected by the white 2^eopl6 of the South, and, with the co-opera- tion of the President it will not he difficult to compel the Senate to submit once viore to the obligations of the Constitution. It will not be able to withstand the public judgment, if distinctly invoked and clearly expressed ' on this fundamental issue, and it is the sure way to avoid all future strife to jiut the issue plainly to the country. ^^ I repeat that this is the real and only question which ice shoidd alloic to control us. ' ' It was upon this letter that Frank P. Blair obtained the nomination. It was the sentiment of this letter which brought Wade Ilampton, and Gen. Forrest to his support. y Senator Bayard understands the platform and the Blair letter to be' substantially the same. lie says: ''It (the platform) is in accord, in some measure, with the senti- ments of the able statesman and gallant sol- dier who received the nomination for Vice President, General Frank Blair, of Mis- souri." Speaking of the Blair letter the Churlotts- ville (Va.) Chrcnicle says : '■^Thcre cannot be two opinions among those who desire to see the Constitution re-estab- lished as to the doctrine of the letter, and we believe that the chances are in its favor as a matter of politics at this time. "The Democratic party is nothing unless it is bold and aggressive, and (he Blair letter, as well as the previous record of the General, furnish very good guarr.ntees that he is the man to give it that character." The Lynchburg Virginian of the same date is equally explicit in its endorsement of Blair's revolutionary programme. Af- ter denouncing the fourteenth nmcndmcnt and the reconstruction acts as a farce, it says: "Frank Blair proposes to dramatize the reconstruction acts in a way that would plague the inventors " smartly." We hope that the reins of Government will be placed in the hands of men who will have the nerve to uivdo. at any hazard, the wrong that has been done." These arc but samples of the maimer in which the Democratic candidates and plat- form are received at the South. The Blair letter is the key note to the campaign. It furnishes the rule for the construction of the platform. Every other issue is merged in the one fact that the reorganized State governments must be destroyed. This done, and the rebel leaders placed in con- trol, all else becomes easy. The national debt may be repudiated or the rebel debt assumed at pleasure. As claimed by the rebel orators, the elec- tion of Seymour and Blair is to be the tri- umph of the "lost cause," it is to gain by the ballot all they lost by the bayonet. Governor "Wise, of Virginia, in a recent speech declared that he admitted the loss of slavery, but adhered to the right of se- cession which would yet triumph. FINANCE AND THE PUBLIC DEBT. On this subject the Democratic platform presents the following : Third. Payment of the public debt of the United States as rapidly as practicable ; all moneys drawn from the people by taxation, except so much as is requisite for the neces- sities of the Government, economically ad- miuestered, being honestly applied to such payment, and where the obligations of the Government do not expressly state, upon their face, or the law under which they were issued does not provide that they shall be paid in coin, they ought in right find justice be paid in the lawful money of the United States. Fourth. *Equal taxation of every species of property according to its real value, in eluding Government bonds and other public securities. ^^ Fifth. One currency for the Govern- ment and the people, the laborer and the office-holder, the pensioner and the soldier, the producer and the bond-holder." This is understood by the followers of the party to mean gold, greenbacks, or repudiation, to suit the locality. The Nashville Union and Dispatch, a Denioc.atic sheet, says : "'The Democratic platform provides that 'where the obligations of the Government do not expressly state upon their face, orthe law under which they were issued does not provide thr.t they shalt be paid in coin, they ought in right and in justice to be paid in the lawful money. of the United States.' — When this was reported to the convention it was greeted with ' thunders of applause.' The Democratic party is, therefore, pledged to pay the five-twenty bonds of the United States in greenback.s. The party is also pledged by the platform to ' one currency for the Government and the people, the laborer and the oflicc-holder, the pensioner and the soldicFj the producer and the bondholder.' Tkere is no equivocation or doubt about the position of the Democratic i>arty on the greenback question. 'J'he convention has come fully up to the requirements of the Democrats and Conservatives of Tennessee and the West oa this issue. And Governor Seymour has planted himself fairly and squarely on this plank of the platform.— Whatever ■ position he may have previously assumed, he is now pledged to the payment of the United States bonds, known as fire- twenties, in greenbacks, and he will honestly and faithfully adhere to that position. He has never been known to falsify his pledges." A Democratic orator in a neighboring city recently declared that the platform meant and was intended to mean absolute repudiation. That the debt having been contracted in the prosecution of an nncon- stitutional war, was itself unconstitutional and void, and could not be legally paid. Any practical man will see that the greenback and repudiation schemes are sub- stantially the same. To force the payment of the bonds by flooding the country with irredeemable paper is, so far as the people are concerned, equivalent to unqualified repudiation. It would postpone the resumption of coin payments indefinitely, disturb values, destroy confidence, and end in final, repu- diation ; whereas tlie whole difficulty may be avoided by bringing greenbacks to the gold standard, when it will not matter whether the bonds arc paid in gold or greenbacks. To keep the public faith is to restore the industries and business of the country to prosperity, give stability to values, employment to labor, and to pro- mote economy in public and private affairs. The sixth plank of the Democratic plat- form calls for the reduction of the army, the discontinuance of th.c Freedmcn's Bu- reau, and reform in the tax laws. These demands have already been anticipated by Republican legislation, but not without op- position from the Democrats in Congress. It further demands that the currency ho made good, but does not suggest how this ia to be done. It is therefore inferred that it is to be done by an issue of greenbacks to pay the five-twenty bonds. The demand of the Democracy for the protection of American citizens abroad has also been anticipated by act of Congress, by which it is made the duty of the Preei dent to aflbrd such protection. The platform further adopts the Repub- lican policy in regard to the public lands. 'I'he administration of Andrew Johnson is fully endorsed. It enters up a long list of charges against the Republican party, which have been in the moutlf of every rebel and Copperhead from the beginning of the rebellion to the present time. It will be seen by a careful perusal of the Democratic platform that it practi- cally confesses judgment upon every issue, except that of the public faith and the res- ton tion of the Union, and on these sub- jects it declares substantially that, the cur- rency shall be made good by violating the national obligations, and' then issuing the nation's promises to pay, just what it re- fuses to pay. First, discredit the Govern- ment paper and then force it upon the peo- ple. And on the question of restoring the Union it declares that, to the extent that restoration has been effected, it shall be de- stroyed, and the States be remitted to the condition they were in at the close of the rebellion, subject to the control of the rebel leaders. As they declared the war a fail- ure in 18G4, they declare restoration a fail- ure in 1868. But they further declare that, if entrusted with power they will make restoration a failure, by force of arms if needs be, and by Executive power will compel the ad- mission of rebel leaders into Congress and the other departments of the Government. Thus it its the Democrats contend for the issue of an irredeemable currency and the restoration of the rebellion ; and the Re- publicans contend for the maintenance of the public faith and the restoration of the Union. These are the issues, and the only issues, presented by the Democracy. THE TESTIMONY. When the rebellion was at its zenith, in the very height of its powrr, Fer.vaxdo Wood, then as now, a Democratic leader, said: "The war should cease, because it should never have been commenced, inasmuch as there is no coercive military power in the Federal Goverumeitt as against the States, are sovereign, and in possession of all which power not delegated. If power of coercion exists at all, it is legal and not military." Mr. Wood desired to have the Union armies withdrawn, and the rebellion put down by a suit in court. He denied the power of coercion, but insisted that if it existed at all it was legal and noi military. HOW IS IT XOW? Mr. Wood and his associates do not like the reconstructed governments. What is the remedy they propose? Is it legal or military 1 General Blair has already an- swered, on a precedin;^ P^gc that, it is military and not legal; That the Demo- cratic President to bo elected must, in dc- liance of law and of the law-making power, destroy thoseStates, undo what has been done, ibrce the representatives of the rebel oligarchy into the Cabinet and the Na- tional Councils, and ^'compel the Senate to submit," And it was because of this de- claration that F. P. Blair, Jr., was choacH as tho representative of a proposed rebel- lion which, tho Democratic Icadet.-J, North and South, are advocating and organizing. WII.iT THE DEMOCKATIC LEADERS SAY. TOOMBS. Mr. Robert Toonabs, in his late Georgia speech argued that all the action of the Government in reference to the South for the last three years was void and of no effect. The St. Louis Times declares : " If Mr. Blair become President, and swear to obey the Constitution, and fail to overthrow the oligarchy established by Brownlow in Tennessee, Blair would be perjured." "There is but one way to restore the Government and the Constitution, and that is for the President elect to declare these (reconstruction) acts null and void, compel the army to undo its usurpations at the South, disperse the carpet-bag State gov- ernments, allow the white people to reor- ganize their own governments, and elect Senators and BcprGseutativcs.'" — Blair's letter. GOVERNOR VAKCE. ''What the Confederacy fought for would be won by the election of Seymour and Blair." A. II. Stephens said, when tho Confed- eracy was organized that, it was to estab- lish a government whose corner-stone was slavery. That is what tho Coaederacy fought for, it is what Vance says they will gain by the election of Seymour and Blair. ANDREW JOHNSO.V. In his late veto message, Mr. Johnson says: "All the State governments ocganized in those States under acts of Congress, and under military control, are illegitimate and of no validity whatever ; and the votes cast in those States for Preeident and Vice Pres- ident, in pursuance of acts passed since the 4:th of March, 18G7, and in obedience to the so-called reconstruction acts of Congress, cannot bo legally received and counted ; while tho only votes in those States that can be legally cast and counted will be those cast in pursuance of tho law.i in force in tho several States prior to the legislation by Congress upon the subject of reconstruc- tion.'' Will Mr. Johnson, as General Blair sug- gests, use the array to abolish tho reorgan- ized States ? Tie has by solemn proclama- tion declared that the governments found in the rebel States when the war closed were usurpations and void, and he abolished them by military edict. He now declares that all the governments organized under acts of Congress are illegitimato and of no validity. What then? Only this, that the governments organized by the military without authority of law, are legal, and votes under these governments must be counted; while governments organized under military rule, and under authority of law, are of no validity and votes under them want not be counted. So that in the mind of Mr. Johnson, Gen- eral Blair and the Democratic party, it is the law enacted in pursuance of the Consti- tution which vitiates tlic Government, and the absence of law which validates them. This is precisely the position assumed in tho Democratic platform, only the Conven- tion was too cowardly to state it as clearly as has Mr. Johnson, Gen. Blair and Gov- ernor Vance. But lot us call otlior wit- nesses. GENERA?. I.AWTON. . 'I'he ex-Confedoratc General A. R. Law- ton, said in a speech at Savannali, Ga. : ' "Now, for the first time, we have aplat- foim of principles and leaders around whom we could rally. It was tho noblest, best, boldest declaration of principles ever laid down in the United States, and the demon- stration hero to-night thows it was in. uni- son with the feel jigs of the people. There was nothing that the South wanted that was not there. The military despotism which has held us in thraldom was there set in its proper light. Fur the first time we have a platform we can adhere to. We have a work to do which can be accom- plished. We have leaders to rcpu-sent those principles who will carry u.s out of the 'Slough of Despond." Peace has it8 vie- tones as well as war ; those great principles for which we fonght. aud which we- feared were lost, may yet be achieved." A KEBEL NEWSPAPER. The Augusta (Ga.) Chronicle, a bitter anti-reconstruction journal, quotes Sey- Eiour's speech delivered on his election as permanent President of the New York Convention, and Blair's infamous letter. It then says : " The sentiments expressed by both can- didates are consonant with the views and wishes of the Southern people, who only seek for that measure of justice which the Constitution and laws guaranty to every State and citizen. General Blair has only one way ia which these oiitrages on the Constitution can be checked a.nd remedied and the Government restored. It is this : The President shall declare the reconstruc- tion acts null and void, compel the army to undo its usurpations at the South, dis- perse the carpet-bag State governments, allow the white people to recognize their own governments and elect Senators and Representatives." The Mobile Tribune SLSserts : "The great Democratic party will rise in its might and majesty, and pulverize and purge the Congress, just as Cromwell purged the long Parliament. The signs of the times are pregnant with resistance to Radical tyranny, and the dagger of Brutus may aid in accomplishing our redemption from Radical rule, ruin, and usurpation." Does this mean that they will murder Seymour, if elected, that Blair may rule? MGRK REBEIi WITNESSES. At the Democratic convention held in Atlanta, Ga., one of the speakers, Clarke by ijame, "pledged himself before God to fight to the last the new governments that had been set up in the South." The Memphis (Tenn.) Avalanche, in al- luding to Blair's letter, says : "For uttering similar sentiments to the above we have been denounced and called impudent. Had the above extract appeared in the AvalancJic as editorial, the political fossils would have raised their hands in holy horror, and stigmatized us as a revo- lutionist. We would have been taunted with the worn-out stereotyped complaint that such imprudent expressions injure the Northern Democracy and the Southern peo- ple in the North. But, strange to say, it was the publication of the letter, from which we take the above extracts, that secured Mr. Blair his nomination for the Vice Pres- idency. Thus it will be seen that the North is far ahead of the South. They are rife for revolution." The Charlottville (Va.) Chronicle says : "General Blair was an Abolitionist and a war man •, but those are dead issues, and, if he was sincere in his recent letter, he- will anstuer our purpose." Humphrey Marshall asserted in his Louis- ville speech that if the Democratic ticket Avas elected his party would "wipe out" all that had been done in the wuy of recon- struction, and the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution. John Forsyth proclaims, through the col- umns of tlie Mobile Advertiser: "Mississippi must vote, and the Democ- racy loill see to its being counted. Texas and Virginia cannot go through with the forms of the Radical programme in time to bo admitted before the election, as Con- gress will adjourn beforehand. But they must votei^ AYc summon thc!^e rebel witnesses — first, because they have the control of the Dem- ocratic pai-ty, and, second, because they arc franker and honester men than the Copperheads'. Lest this may be disputed we place upon the stand EX-REBEL GENERAL WADE IlA.MrTON. In his speech at Charleston, after his return from the Democratic Convention, Mr. Hampton told the people that being on the committee onresolutions in the Tammany Convention, when itwas proposed to insert the clause declaring that the "right of suffrage belongs tothe States," he shrcwedly asked what wasto be under- stood by "States." " I agreed to the propositions, but at the same time said that it seemed to me that they had omitted one very vital point, which was to declare to what States the doctrine applied. I thought it was neces- sary to guard and limit that declaration, and to the end that we might know at what time we could go back and say who were the citizens of the States, I asled that they icoidd declare that these questions belonged to the States imdcr ;]ieir Constitutions up to the year IS65.'' To this the Northern and Western men in the Convention objected as imprudent: " Gentlemen were there from the North, South, East, and West, and by all we were met with extreme cordiality. They paid they were willing to cive us everything de- sired ; but xve of the South must rcracmher that they had a great fight to make, and it would not he •policy to place vpon fliat 'platform that xchichwoidd engender preju- dice at the North. They, however, pledf^cd themselves to do all in their poM'er to re- lieve the Southern States, and to restore to us the constitution as it had existed. As we were met in such a kindly spirit, I could not but reciprocate it. I kncv that I was representing; the feelings of my people when I did so, and I told them that I would withdraw all the resolutions I had offei'ed, and no doubt other Southern dele- gates would do the same, and would accept the resolutions oQered by Hon. Mr. Bayard, the Senator from Delaware, which declared that_ the right of suffrage belonged to the States. I said I would take the resolutions if they would allow me to add Ijut three •words, which you will find embodied in the platform. I added this : ^And we declare thatthe Reconstruction acts are revolution- aryj unconstitutional, and void'' When I proposed that, every single member of the committee — and the warmest men in it were men from the North — came forward and said they would carry it out to the end. Having thus pledged themselves, I feel assured that when the Democratic party come to triumph they will show us a remedy for our misfortunes in their own good time, for which I am perfectly willing to wait. Such is the history of our plat- form, and such were the motives which governed the committee in its formatiou." To clinch the nail, the men of Hampton's mind secured the nomination of JMr. Blair, who had already declared publicly that the State governments in the Southern States must be, and if he had power should be, overthrown, by military force if necessary. There is a whole volume in this short speech of General Uarapton. It disclosed the fact, Grst, that he, (Hampton,) an ex- rebel general, dictated the Democratic flatform on the subject of reconstruction, s not this a complete surrender to the rebel leaders? AVhat more could the reb- els ask than to dictate tJio terms of settle- ment, had they been the conquerors instead of being the conquered? Did Leo pre- scribe terms to Grant at Appomattox? Yet here is (iencral Hampton prescribing terms to tlic Democratic Convention. Could subserviency go lower, or cowardice sink a party deeper, tlian does this one fact ? But, second, Mr. Hampton says he let up on the Democracy because they liad a hard row to lioo ia the loyal States, and they thought, therefore, that a plain dccla- tion of what they meant imprudent. It would not do to let the people of the North know just what they intended. The real purpose of the platfcrm must 1^ kept from the people. But the committee prom- ised him all he desired, and the warmest men in making these pledges were from the North. It was because of these warm demonstrations that General Hampton con- sented to withdraw his other propositions. He could not find it in his heart to force these Northern Democrats to tell the hon- est truth before the people. Therefore he considerately joined in to help cheat the people of the North, where the fight was to be hard, but in the South he must and would tell the truth. Any one who will carefully read this speech of Hampton's will be convinced that the whole Democratic platform is a swindle, as are the candidates, and but for Hampton's courage and Blair's folly in disclosing the cheat, and making known the real purposes of the party, they would have stood a little chance of imposing upon some honest Democrats ; but now that the fraud is expose* their plan is ruined. MORE WITXESSKS. But here are a few more choice crumbs from rebel sources : " The Montgomery (Confederate) con- stitution is better than oars, (United States.") — Horatio Seymour to Judge liug- gles, ill 18G1. ' ' The -Ith of July has ceased to be of the slightest interest to the Democracy, partic- ularly of the South." — Richmond Exam- iner. " The spirit of Wilkes Booth still lives, thank God! Therefore, take courage 1' Seymour, Blair, and the revival of the great cause is the motto . of every true man ! ' '—Pine Bluff ( Ark. ) Vindicalor. The New York 11 orZii says : "For as many crimes against law. Con- stitution, and human nature as our Con- gress C(^mmit?, the British people would smash Parliament and hang peers and com- moners in Hyde Park. "Blood is tliicker than water. Race stands by race, all except rump Congressmen. They stand by the negroes whom they stir up to rebellion. "The new rebellion will array the people of the United States against two hundred thousand negroes and two hundred whir^ negroes in Congress. God save the radical rebels if Ihey bring on more var, for the people won't 8ave them. " In case of a new rebellion Jefferson Davis Avill have a chance to go bail for his bondsman, whose paper now stirs up the war." THE IIONKSTY A.VD PATRIOTISM OF SEY.\I0VK EXPLAINED. Captain jMarshall, a brother of Thomas Marshall, said, at a recent Kentucky Dem- ocratic ratification, "that ho was enthusias- tic in support of Seymour, and gave his reasons therefor. Seymour was nominated as a War Democrat, for the reason that no other could win. He was called a. AVar Democrat, but ho had never given any aid or support to the Government in prosecu- tion of the war when it could be avoided. In ISGIi, when the rebel troops were in Pennsylvania, and the Government called on Seymour, who was then Governor of New York, to furnish troops to expel them, he answered in the same manner, if not in the same language, as the Governor of Kentucky in 18G1, viz : that he would not send them.* He did send them, how- ever, for the reason that he was unable to do otherwise." UxicA, N. Y., July 21, 18G8. DeauSii; : — Your letter of the 16th inst. to Governor Seymour is received. He directs me to answer your interrogatories, and say he docs not o'.vn a United States bond, and never did own one ; and he never dealt in bonds or Ijanking of any kind. Vcrv respectfully yours, B. D. Noxox, Jr. To it. 11. DuNX, Esq., Bloomingtoii, lU. This testimony ought to be satisfactory to rebels, it certainly will be to loyal men. Mere is his own statement that he would not trust the Government, and of his friend that he never aided it, even in his official capacity, except as he was forced to. Nom- inated as a War Democrat: 1st. Because they could elect no other ; and 2d. Because he was opposed to the war and sympathised with the rebellion. Seymour and the i^lat- form arc an exact match. Cotli swindles, contrived and selected to cheat the people of the loyal States, and serve the purposes of the rebel leaders. Seymour himself ad- mitting that ho would be dishonored if lie accepted the nomination. No witnesses are needed to prove that he then spoke the truth. In view of the facts hereinbefore pre- sented, we charge the Democratic party : 1st. That it has proved false to its early record and history, false to liberty, false to the country, its laws and Constitution, and false to the people whom it seeks to govern. 2d. That it in no honest sense represent? the loyal people of the nation, bat on the contrary; is consorting with, and controlled by, the disloyal and despotic partisan leaders who organized and conducted a gigantic rebellion against Constitutional liberty and in the interests of a slave-hold- ing oligarchy. 3d. That by the confession of its own leading advocates it has, by its national delegates in convention assembled, adopted and published to the country a platform of principles for the purpose of cheating the loyal people into its support, while it rests under secret pledges to rebel leaders to give them all they desire. . 4th. That while professing veneration for the Union and the Constitution, it stands pledged to destroy the one and dis- regard the other. .'ith. That its candidate for the chief office by the confession of his own partisans is, and has been, a foe to the Government and a friend to the conspiracy for its de- struction; that professing to be a War Demo- crat, he is and was a rebel in disguise, as is proven by his past record and the un- contradicted statements of the rebel lead- ers who placed him in nomination. That he has been thrust upon the party, against the judgment and wishes of its honest sup- porters, and by a clique of corrupt and disloyal leaders. 6th. That its candidate for the second office is in open and undisscmblcd sym- pathy with the rebel leaders, and pledged to re-open the conflict against the Union if entrusted with power. 7th. That, as claimed by the rebel lead- ers and press of the South, and not denied by leaders or press in the North, the elec- tion of these candidates upon this platform will be the defeat of loyalty, the triumph of treason, and the renewal of rebeUion. If these are the objects for which Demo- crats desire to vote, tlien Seymour and Blair arc the men to vote for. If there are Democrats, and we believe there are, who desire a restored Union, just laws, the niaintenance of tlic public faith, and tlie peace and prosperity of the llepublic, let them vote for Grant and Cqlfax. riUXTED at TlIK C:KI; at P.EPL-Bl.lC okvick, wasiiixgtox, d. c.