■■/- ." 'X^' ^°.. ^V->■ '„W^v^^<^« ^'^ *^ 0-^ .,-1 '^^ i^,- X. '.^3m5>^° C?- . <-, .J • o_ ' . , ^ • -0 ^„ '\ -0' o -p. '->, y .0 ,-^ -,1;^^?;^ o V \ •-;:..->^ %;-i¥!*--.o'^ \-^^!a!?:>^ 'V-l|«-\o'* \^^ ,-{► ^ '>r'l'f., f ^m^.:S^/ ^mk:. "^ v^ r'fi««i:» - t-0^ ^o '/' ,0" .0^ V ,v^^' 9 , 5 ^.N V _ _ 'i^ aV '^v\ T^ _ - ■^> A> " » " ■ ^s> V <5> - . - ■' A>^ ■t- •,V'' ' . . s * J A^-^^ V > <*. c^-^^ „v- ^ ' • • ' v 0' < ^o. 'Mw^' '^ ^f^. .0-^ A'^^ v^;.,.^ v^ K \-s^- 'Sfe^ %.^ ^>«* X/ :E^ ■> ^^-o-< °^ .^q. ^^ * O . O ' S>^ (-0 '' -^^^ -^ .,-^* .-■ o > -^^ -^^ .HO, >; ^'i^r. \ '*^- "'!'^'i^/ o_t^"^ V-^.^iJ?.^ .^"^^ '.^lis^-.^^ kV^ '^:'--^''- ^- '^, V ' = .»' ^^^ o^ ■ > V • • • <•- c- <_^ f)i6tory of Lowell and Its People BY FREDERICK W. COBURN ILLUSTRATED VOLUME L LEWIS HISTORICAL PUBLISHING COMPANY NEW YORK CITY I 920 C()i'\'Ki(;iri', IQ20 Ttii-: [,k\\is I lisiiiKicAi. i'ri;i.[siii.\(; Oimi'AXY. :EC 1 1 1920 ©CI.A56I8J2 a FOREWORD THE CITY BENEFICENT: A TRIBUTE To the city which ga\c nie such eikication as J was able to assimi- late in boyhood, through its schools, its library and other institutions, and through its industrial and commercial life, I should like to think that some reader may feel this book to he a tribute of gratitude. It is meant to be that, as well as a record of happenings. Lowell of 1SS5 and thereabout stays in memory in loco parentis — a third parent, as it were, complementing by the influence of training and surroundings whatever of endowment may have come down from respected ancestors. I believe that every man and woman who has had the advantage of spending a childhood in our city will gladly acknowledge his indebtedness to a community in which, whatever its shortcomings, a spirit of friemlliness and helpfulness has always been paramount. I'rom my early infancy until as a young man I went elsewhere, our city gave continuousl}- of its op])ortunities, and, imper- fectly as I received them, I still might hope to have the ability to render some small gift in grateful recognition. This work may or may not come under that category ; it at least has been compiled with a hope of its being to some possessor of inspi- rational as well as informational value. In gathering material and in otherwise preparing myself to write the work that follows, I ha\e tried to think of the commmiity as a social organi'-m, a modern analogue of the "City-State'' of the ancients, its development, era by era, to be traced at least suggestivelv and pic- turesquely. The so-called economic interpretation of history has come to appeal strongly to most men of my temperament and tiu'u of mind, and this particular subject, which was assigned me to ccjver by the publishers in January, iqi", has naturally lent itself to a somewhat intensive study of the impingement of successive culture epochs on a single locality. Without, therefore, neglecting the conventional topics of an archivist and biograjihical sort that are inevitably taken u]) in histories of this kind, 1 have endeavored to stress the basic industries of the locality and the reaction of the inhabitants u])on the conditions created by these. This treatment has necessitated departing some- what from the dejiartnientalizing that is usu.al in local histories. As a reader I have always felt that separate consideration of topics, as of "pciiitics," "commerce and manufactures,'' "law and lawyers," "physi- iv iiis'i'oin' OF l()\\i-;ll cians," "art and artists," while perhaps logically justified as a matter of c-on\-enienee of record, hinders the formation of any clear mental picture of tlic characteristics of successive eras. 1 have, accordingly, thrown much material whicli might have appeared in dejjartmental form, into the narrative sections of the work. In arranging these latter I ha\i- in a general way followi-d a jilan of taking u]} first the economic aspects of the period, then the develojjment during that period of puhlic and privately controlled institutions, and. finally, the personal and anecdotal material that serves to illustrate the character of the time. 'I'lu' one-hundredth anni\ersary of the fcnmding of the city will be at hand soon after this hook is on the reailing tables of those who have sub.scribed for it. The successive occurrences in celebration of the advent of cotton manufacturing at I-'ast Chelmsford, the incorporation of the town and its re-incor])oration ten years later as a city, will, no doubt. gi\e publicitx to many new and \'aluable local historical contri- butions. It is lioi)ed that this work, though published a little in advance of the earliest of these celebrations, may seem worthy to be regarded as one of the commemorative efforts ajipropriate to the third decade of this century at Lowell. It has been prepared during two and one-half years of most eventful general history. The coi")i:)eration of several friends of expert (|uaIification has helped to give cseph B. X'arniim — The Lex- ington Alarm — Capt. John F"ord — Battle of Bunker Hill — Early Anti-Slavery Feeling — Rescue of Silas Royal 74 Chapter \'I — Beginnings of Industrial Lowell — Lieut. Israel Hil- dreth — Shays' Rebellion — \\'ar of 181 2 — Forty Years of In- dustrial Expansion — Highwaj-s ami Canals — Original Paw- tucket Bridge — Enterprise at Pawtucket Falls — Middlesex Canal — Manufactures Before the Factory System — Old Resi- dences — Churches and Schools 95 Chapter \TI — Creation of the Factory System — Francis Cahot Lowell and His Power Looin — New Life at Old Wamesit — Founders of Lowell — Erection of Factories- — Earliest Corpo- ration Boarding Houses — St. Anne's, oldest downtou-n Church — Incorporation of Town of Lowell — Multiplication of Textile Plants — An Aristocracy of Talent — Coming of the Irish — Early Captains of Industry — Old-time Merchants — Genesis of Factory Workers — Real Estate Developments — The Nesmiths — Politics in the Town Period 131 Chapter \'1II — An Era of Development — Conimeticenient of School System — Fight for a Modern School System — Inaugu- ration of High School — Early Days of the Fire Department — vi HISTORY OF LOWELL Pack. Comint; C)f Churclies — Tlic I'ldiuor of Thrift Institutions — Art, Literature and Mu^ic in tlic 'l"i>\vnship Period — The Old Stone House — Beginnin<;s of the Anti-Slaverv ]\roveiTient — Temperance Ag"itation in tlie W'ashingtonion I\r;i — Introc'uc- tion of Coal — L'oniinq- (if the ivailriiad 188 Chapter IX — Lowell, the Ante-Helium City — Earliest Mayors — ( )ld City Hall — The Commons — Court Houses and Jails — Early Judges — Introduction nf Running Water — Establish- ment of a City Library — Central llridge — Annexation of Cen- tralville — Dedication of Fair Crounds — Postmasters and Con- gressmen — \'isit of Abraluini Lincoln — Hydraulic Engineer- ing — Cotton Manufacture in Xineteenth Century — Deyelop- ment of Carjiet Manufacture — Beginnings of Patent Medicine Trade — Effects of F^actory System on Operatiyes — Charles Dickens' Obser\'ations — Organization of Humanitarian Asso- ciations — Tlie "LDwell C)ffering" — Middlesex Mechanics' Association — ( Jpening of Hos])ital and Dispensary — New Churches in F're-War Period — Wealthy Alen of the Fifties — Drama and Music — Art. and the h^xposition of '51 216 Chapter X — Lowell in the Civil War — Local Conditions — Alioli- tion of Toll Bridge — ( ien. Butler's "First Aid" to the Union — Liiwell's Most Celebrated Soldier — The Lowell Martyrs in Baltimore — Death of Whitney and Ladd — Obsequies of the Baltimore \'ictims — Soldiers' Aid Association — Hard Times in War Years — Municipal Affairs — i'lrst Street Cars — Lyceum Bureau — The Musical Lews — Development of Willow Dale — Art Panoramas — Return of Sixth Regiment — Lowell Men in < )ther Regiments — Lowell in the Navy — War Souvenirs — Burial of Capt. Edward Abliutt — Lowell Boys at Ship Island — Flow the City Supported the National Administration — First of the (Ireat Sanitary h'airs — The Ladd and Whitney Ml mument 285 Cha])ter XI — Frum the Civil War to the Chicago Flxposition — The I'rench Canadians — Increasing Cosmopolitanism of the City — Beginnings of Trade Unionism — Business Growth — Lowell Manufacturers at the Centennial Exposition — Im- |)rovement (if Water Power — New Industries — Municipal Affairs — Ldwell's Representatives in Congress — Governor Butler — Acti\'ities of City Departments — The Schools — From llorse Cars to the Trolley System — The Meigs Monorail — St. John's Hospital — Lowell General Hospital — Humanita- CONTENTS vii I'Ar.i:. rian Inslitulinns — l'"ronch I'roteslant College — The \'(irick and Highland Clubs — Intensive Athletics — Historical Cele- brations 341 Chapter XH — The Quarter-Century. 1893-1918 — Increasing Cos- mopolitanism — French-speaking Population — The Greeks — Polyglot Colonies — Business Expansion — The Strike i)f 1003 — Lowell Textile School — Modern Industrial Lowell — The Board of Trade — Newspajiers — Abantlonment of Corporation Boarding Houses — Absentee Ownership — New City Hall and Library — Commission (knernment — Ik-ginnings of Park Sys- tem — Bridges and Highways — Puldic Lilirary — Puljlic Health and Hovising — The Licpior Traffic — ICducational Progress — Religious Develojinients — Cardinal O'Connell — The City's Foremost Benefactor — Historical and Patri(3tic Societies — Revived Art Association — Middlesex Women's Club — Rogers Hall School — X'csper Country Club — Fish and (lame Asso- ciation 394 Chapter XIII — Bibliography 463 Chapter XI\' — Literary Lowell — "The Lowell Offering'" — Lowell Authors — Journalism — "The Lowell Courier" — Short-lived Journals — The "\"ox Popidi" — "The Citizen" — The "Times," "Mail," and "Sun" 471 Chapter X\' — 'J"he Medical I'rofcssion — I'^.arly Physicians — Later Practitioners 503 Chapter XV'I — Art and Artists 525 Chapter X\TI — Old-time Law and Lawyers — Of Later IJays... 535 CHAPTER I. Lowell a Landmark in National Industry. Judge Josiah Gardner Abbott, in a letter to the committee of tlie fiftieth anniversary exercises commemorating the incorporation of the city of Lowell, writes: "Lowell marks the beginning of an epoch in the history, not only of New England but of the whole country. With the foundations of Lowell were laid the foundations of the manufac- turing industry of the whole country." It is Lowell, in fact, the city, American, progressive, of character- istic annals and normal present activities, that must be the theme of any history, seriously meant, which can at this time be written from the records of the industrial centre at the jvmction of the JMerrimack and Concord rivers in Northeastern Massachusetts. This is not a Mecca of tourists and amateur photographers. It has interesting houses, though few of them can with any accuracy be called colonial. It has a fascinating history, but this is not of the kind that makes Salem and Plymouth and Boston hallowed ground. A student of his- tory of advanced tendencies will find in Lowell immensely rich material with which to illustrate the course of industrialism in America. The historian, on the other hand, who looks only for thrills and throbs, for the achievements of great men in war and politics, will soon see that Lowell oft'ers a limited field. As the oldest of our manufacturing cities, in brief, Lowell is the well-nigh perfect example of its kind — the first to be founded on any considerable scale ; in present status and promise of further civic advance, by no means the least interesting. Such cities, wherever situated, follow a course of development that can ordinarily be predicted. An itidustry or group of industries fixes upon a locality as suitable for exploitation of resources and employment of the local labor. Capital, in other words, has seen an opportunity for favorable investment. New machinery is set up in factories or workshops, and work that pays better, at least in point of cash disbursements, than that previously available begins to tempt people from the adjacent farms. The commencement of an actual city, with an ambitious scheme of streets and public buildings, with provisions for hotising the newly collected armv of wage-earners, is usually quite rapid. Scores of American municipalities assert with pride that they sprang up overnight. This phenomenon of tlie quick rise of communities is, of course, iust as common to-day, especially in the western part of the United L— 1 2 JIISTORY OF LOWELL States and in the Canadi;in northwest, as it was nearly a century ago when the sudden emergence of urban Lowell from the hamlet of East Chelmsford was accounted one of the wonders of American life. Once established, an American industrial city seldom loses the character imparted to it in its first years. The locality may not seem, to after generations, to have been ideally chosen for the particular kind of enterprises out of which its original prosperity grew. Its start HI life may often have been almost fortuitous. Yet, thr(.iugh hard times and boom times, the city continues to attract employers and workers. Though it may even be at a distance from supplies of raw material, and may be hampered by its geographical i)osition as regards the largest consuming centres, nevertheless, decade bv decade, the characteristic American municipality shows a growth in population and wealth quite out of proporticm, as a rule, to the advancement of the country surrounding it. So that the persistence of the I)asic industries of Lowell is true to American form. In the last two decades of the nineteenth centurv. when southern cities began to chronicle the building of factories close to the cotton fields and adjacent to abundant water jxjwer and cheap coal, pessimists were not wanting in New England who predicted a gradual decline of the communities on the Merrimack whose welfare has been dependent largely upon textile manufacturing. There were those whii in 1890 foresaw a shrunken village where once spindles had been ciumted by the hundreds of thousands. Such catastrophes rarely befall, and Lowell has shown the energy and adaptability characteristic of American munici[)alities. It has stood up under comj)etition : it has yielded to no "fell clutch of circum- stance." Progressively cosmopolitan the .\merican citv is. A wage-earn- ing population at first is drawn from the neighboring farms and vil- lages. The country capitalist who moves into the new town to engage in business on a larger scale than his neighborhood has known before, employs his relatives and neighbors. The city at the outset may be urban in name and numbers; its ways are still essentially those of rural North America. Presently, however, as it becomes increasinglv diffi- cult to induce the sons and daughters of the farm to work at the wages paid under competitive conditions in the urban workshops, and as at the same time the growing demand for the city's i)roducts tends to exhaust the local su]iply of labor, employers, thus situated, reach out for the help of immigrants. Adventurous folk from other lands, seek- ing the advantages of a political democracy, are welcomed as workers. .•\ few members of a nationality establish themselves, and these are quickly followed by others from the same foreign town or country- side. Hardly have these newcomers taken up a definite quarter in the AX INDUSTRIAL LANDMARK 3 city, often one abandoned by native Americans, when the pioneers of quite a ditYerent race may arrive and start among themselves a similar process of acclimatization. Soon the immigrants may constitute a majority of the people, but they are in the midst of such processes o^ Americanization that they fit without making much trouble into the scheme of life that was adopted by the fathers of the city. Lowell, as one of the oldest of American industrial cities, is appropriately one of the most cosmopolitan. American cities have been srimewhat slower than from European or Australian example might have been expected to become "com- munities" in the strictest sense of the word. Often they have been a little neglectful of the factors that make for an ecjuation of the com- mon life. For various reasons it has been relatively hard for ten thou- sand, one hundred thousand or a million persons composing an Ameri- can city to beha\'e as if their interests were substantially identical. The early settlers of this country were stout individualists, having the pioneering disposition ; and each man was inclined to clear his tract of the wilderness in his own way. Usually the founders of the cities of to-day were men w^ho had inherited the temperament of these pioneers. Many American manufacturing cities, furthermore, had their begin- ning, as Lowell had, at about the period of the world's history when the ideas of the so-called "Manchester school of economics" in Eng- land were at their height of popular acceptance, and when the notion of avoiding public interference with personal liberty had its warmest advocacy. The inrush of immigrants has helped to keep the popula- tion divided into small groups ot dififering nationalities, and often of diverse languages. These and other causes have made the American city backward, as it may seem to critics of international viewpoint, in undertaking enterprises which require that practically the entire popu- lation shall act in harmony and unity. The racial situation has often helped to make local politics more partisan than patriotic. Lowell has not been exceptional in having periods of its history when it tended to become a city of discordant cliques rather than an organized social entity. It was, however, one of the first places to try to make democratic government genuinely responsible to itself under the com- mission form of administration. Each decade finds the American city, despite its limitations, a better place to live in. Not only is there absolute improvement in opportunities for health, happiness and mutual helpfulness, but the standing of city life as compared with country life shows relative advancement. Not so many years ago it was currently believed, and perhaps with reason, that life in the open country was better for people than that in the crow^ded, noisy and often noisome town. The boy or girl brought up on the farm was seen to have had better training in 4 IllS'J'ORV OF LOWELL hal)its of industry and resourcefulness than the city-bred child. Even now, of course, many of the succe.s.ses of business and professional life in the larger places are won Ijy those who were born and bred on the land. Yet facts and figures accumulate to show that in many respects the modern city is overhauling the country — and, in at least some important features, already has overhauled it — as a focus of the advan- tages that make for well-rounded character. The health of children and adults is better in city than in cotuitry. The so-called funda- mentals of educatiiin, together with other subjects of an enriched curriculum, are better taught in the urban graded schools than they e\er were imparted in the little red school house. Men and women in the cities are better fed and better clad than those of the farming dis- tricts. The higher standards of personal morality, including sexual, that now prevail among most classes of Americans, to put it mildly, are (|uite as distinctly observable in the city and its immediate suburbs as they are in remote and thinly populated regions. Admitting all the charm and natural healthfulness of the country, one could wish the normal boy or girl no better fate than that of being reared in a good home of a modern city, preferably a jilace large enough to insure that educational and social facilities are of standard grade, and yet not so big but that the woods and fields are within easy reach. Such a city of pleasant and inspiriting living conditions Lowell has been and is. Only an optimistic outlook can result from accurate and sympa- thetic obserx'ation of the facts of the history and jjresent situation of the normal American city. A survey of the community's successes and failures may yield material for more or less plausible jeremiads. Figures may be adduced which sc)und an alarm of the falling off of church attendance, the "race suicide" of the old American stock, of apparent increases in arrests for crime, or commitments on account of mental disorder. No social movement, however, is or ever was alto- gether upward. A balance must always be struck between losses and gains, and those who are closest to the facts of city life — such at least has been one writer's observation — are almost unanimous in finding that the advances cjuite outmeasurc the retrogressions. That the Lowell which will celebrate the centenary of its incorporation as a town in 1926 will be a better as well as bigger community than it is to-day, seems as certain, in the hglit of observable tendencies, as that the present city is in many res])ects a more desirable place of resi- dence than that which President .\ndrew Jackson, accompanied bv several members of his cabinet, visited in 1833. The reasonableness of the i)ublication of another history of Lowell is c\ident at this lime, if one considers the likelihood that the city is at the beginning of a new epoch. Twenty years have passed since the Courier-Citizen Company brought out its admirable volume AX INDUSTRIAL LAND:\IARK 5 covering' many aspects of the community's storv from the earliest times onward. In two decades, much water has flown luider Central Bridge. Much new material liearing on the old days has been amassed, some of it in manuscript, or in printed monographs that are not easily accessible to the general reader. The industries of the citv have undergone considerable diversification. The historic form of government has been radically altered. The racial complexity has lieen increased. The interest of the outside world has been challenged by the preservation of a house in which one of the most celebrated of modern artists was born. Above all the quickening of the life of the place which was hastened 1)y the outbreak of the European War. and still further accelerated when the United States entered the conflict, is likely to continue. It seems to be only a question of time when Lowell and the other cities of the Merrimack valley will be to all intents and purposes seaports. Through readiness of access to the sea-borne com- merce of the world, Lowell will have overcome much of the handicap of its location in the extreme northeast corner of the United States. With new opportunities broadening out in every direction, it is visibly entering upon a period of expansion which may make it alike the metropolis of the Merrimack, and one of the large and model cities of North America. CHAPTER II. From Indian Town to Colonial Countryside. Like most New England factory cities, Lowell is one in which the visitor is immediately conscious of the rivers on whose banks it has l)een built. (Jld-time villages were usually placed on high land ; occu- pancy of valley sites 1)ecame comnicm only after the advent of the manufacturing era. The Spindle Cit}- is jieculiarly the gift of the Merrimack river and its tributary, the Concord, both streams of impressive pretensions. The Merrimack in especial, which, as school geographies used to say, "is utilized for m(ire mill power than any other stream in the world," is felt, at this stretch of its course where it turns almost abruptly from its north and south direction toward the northeast, to be a river of unusual nobility and [licturesqueness. The Pawtticket Falls, particu- larly when the river rnns high, have a wildness that approaches gran- deur. The long reaches of still water above and below the city have ])lacid breadth. From the railroad train speeding from Lowell north- ward, the river gives a series of delightful glimpses from the moment it first comes into sight at Middlesex village. From the surface, as seen from canoe or motorboat, it has much of the aspect of a l)eautiful lake. The complete story of the Merrimack and its confluents, from its rise in a tiny pond on the slopes of Mount W'illey in the White moun- tains uiuil it crosses the bar at Newburyjjort, does not belong to this narrative. It was told some half century ago in rather ])rolix and dis- cussive fashion by J. H. Meader. Little need here be noted except that the stream has been celebrated in North American annals ever since Pierre du Gaust, .Sieur dc Monts and Samuel du Champlain, French explorers, on Jul)- 17, 1605, entered the bay where Newburv- pnrt now stands, and that as a source of supply of "white coal" it is still, as at all periods of iiistory. one of the most favorablv situated rivers of the continent in respect of rainfall, incline, storage opportuni- ties and other advantages oljvious to the hydraulic engineer. .\s it reaches Lowell it represents the run-off of territory that is almost ideal for useful ends as well as scenic charm. Central and .Southern New Hampshire is a region of lakes, large and small, which serve as natural storage basins, regulating the flow of water in the river that drains tlie district. In the system are Lakes Winnepesaukee, .Squam, Newfound, Pennacook, Masabesic. Baboosic, and almost innumerable smaller [jonds. Some of these are directly cotitrolled by the Locks and Canals Company. .\11 of them help to promote an equable flow- AX INDUSTRIAL LANDMARK 7 age. The drainage basin, amounting to 5,015 square miles, is a large one for a stream of the length, as one realizes in encountering conflu- ents of the Nashua, one of the tributaries, in Central Massachusetts, or the headwaters of Baker's river, in territory that seems rightlv to belong to the Connecticut valley. The paramount mark of the Merrimack river for nearly a century past has been the industrial usefulness. Flowing through territory that was settled early, and presenting falls and rapids at many points which would naturally suggest easily available water ptnver, the river has had a utilitarian history that might have been predicted a century and a half ago. It would ha\'e been strange, indeed, if the Anglo- Saxon enterprise that led to dotting the landscape with miniature mills along the Charles, the Neponset and the Mother brook within the Boston basin in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries had not eventually moved upon the better chances of the Ijigger river, which, at its point of nearest apjiroach, is only aliout twenty-five miles from the Shawniut i)eninsula. The Merrimack — .\ word about the name of the chief waterway along which Lowell is built should be included. The Merrimack was not only discoxered but named by the chronicler of the "Relations des Jesuits.'" Chamjdain adopted one of two very similar designations gi\en to the river by different tribes of Indians. The aborigines of the north applied to the stream the title of "Merrimack," or "place of the strong current," from the basic words "merroh" ( strong) and "awke'' (a place). The Massachusetts aborigines, on the contrary, called it "Menomack," from "mena," meaning islands, "and awke" (a place). More or less confusion may have resulted from the similarity of those appellations. The spellings, especially before the Revolution, were many, and some of them extraordinary. A grant confirmed by Charles I. in the fourth year of his reign was to certain persons of a region thus described: "All that part of New England, in America, which lies and extends between a great river that is commonly called Mono- mack, alias Merrimack," etc. The following twenty orthographical modes were noted by the late James B. Francis in early records: Malamake. Maremake. Meremack, Meremacke. Meremak. Merimacke, Mermak, Merramack, Merramacke. Merremacke. Merremeck, Merri- mac, Merrimach, Merrimack, Merrimak, Merrimeek, Merrymacke, Monnomacke, Monomack, Monumach. On this subject of the spelling of the stream's name, it may be added, considerable acrimony existed for years between the up-river and down-river cities. Below Lawrence, people have long insisted on dropping the final "k," which Lowell, Nashua, Manchester and Concord have regarded as essential. Through the efforts of Congressman John Jacob Rogers, in 1914, the authority of the L^nited -States Government was invoked ti) declare the spelling preferred at Lowell to be the legal one. 8 HISTORY OF LOWELL W'liilc it is uncertain at what date wandering white men may have arrived at points in the Merrimack valley, it is well established, as brought iiut in a i)aper communicated by James Kimball to the his- torical ccjllections of the Essex Institute, that an authorized explora- tion of the river was conducted in 1638, when the Massachusetts Bay Colony was hardly a decade old. This quest was tmdertaken in the interest of new homes for the throng of immigrants who were arriv- ing during what is generally called the "great migration.'' "Within ten or twelve years," writes Mr. Kiml)all, "after the arri\al of Endi- cott the colonists are represented as being straightened for want of land." Hubbard, in his history of New England confirms this state- ment, saying that Ipswich was so filled \^•ith inhabitants that many of them presently swarmed out to another place a little eastward. Because of numerous petitions for "farm lands," measures were taken to ex])lore the Merrimack to the "extreme Northerly" line of the patent or charter granted to the Massachusetts Bay Company. In the colonial records appears this order : Generall Court at Boston ordered: 6th Jmij., 163S. Goodman ^Voodward Mr. John Stretton, with an Indian & two others appointed by the Magestrates of Ipswich, are to lav out the line 3 miles Northward of the most Northernmost i)art of Merrimack for w"^'' they are to have 5 s. a day a piece. These surveyors com])leted their work as far as the outlet of the Winne])esaukee. which they regarded the main confluent of the Merri- ni;ick, and at the Weirs they car\-ed in a boidder the lettering which ma}' still be seen : W. P. TOHN ENDICVT GOV [ I Jonathan Inch These letters were disclosed in I1S31 diu"ing a preliniinar\- exami- nation of the storage possibilities of W'innepesaukee basin. Within the memory of the ])rcsent generation the rock was covered with the present canopy. Th;it the surveyors' work was satisfactorily achieved ma}- be sur- mised from the following legislative resolve: May 22d, 1639. Goodman Woodw.ird was ordered to have 3 £ for his journev to discover the running up on Merrnnack : 10 s. more was added bv order of the Gov. & Dep. And they which went with h.im ; Tho. Houlet, Sargent Jacob, The Clarke & John Manning to have 5.0 s. a peice &c. DF.\-KLOPMENT FROM INDIAN TOWN 9 Voyaging on the Merrimack must have yiekled data about the river at a fairly early date. In 1635 there was published in London by William Wood a map which gave the general course of the river, locating Amoskeag, Pennacook, Pawtucket and an island called Wick- assee. A description in the British Museum which gives the length of the stream as one hundred miles and states that in places it is ten miles broad, has some of the present Indian names. The Concord River at Lowell — The chief trilnitar}- of the Merri- mack in Massachusetts is the stream that drains the eastern jjart of a trough running across the State between the coast hills and the rugged jjlateau of the central district. This river shares with the larger water course into which it nuis in economic res])onsibility for the city of Lowell. An interesting river, on many counts, is the Concord, and to fol- low its meanderings from the spot where it is formed by the junction of the Sudbur_\- and .\ssabet would involve much historical retrospect. Like most of the rivers flowing northward in this terrain, the Concord is notably sluggish. It ofTers many camp sites, but relatively few water powers. An entertaining characterization of the Concord, now thronged with pleasure canoes from A])ril to Novemlier, ma}' be (|Uoted from Meader, who wrote in the late si.xties: For fifty years past the true character of this remarkable stream was so little understood even Isy land owners along its borders that an almost continuous and very acrimonious legal controver.sy was maintained, which resulted in establishing the fact, by an able board of legislative commissioners, that the river was a very different thing from what they had all their lives supposed it to be. An inability to understand its true character had always prevailed. It had been an aggravating and expensive problem to some, and an insoluble mystery to others. The first blood of the Revolution, the blood of the intrepid and invincible yeomanry, mingled with its turbid waters at the Old North Bridge, and long years before it had been the haunt of the wary and stealthy barbarian, who, swooping down upon the exposed and defenceless settlers, enacted those atrocities which marked the advanc- ing borders of civilization in New England, and makes the history of that epoch a yet existing terror. It was then called the Mu.sketaquid or Meadow River, and it is the meadow river still, — a strong proof that the appropriateness of Indian designations need not be questioned, much less changed. If in some sense a river is a type of human life, this particular stream may be cited as symbolizing the actual career of many individuals known to those who may give the coni])arison a little reflection. How many there are who start off on the journev of life like this stream, — useless, idle and aimless, instead of becoming a wheel, a lever, an axle, a somethmg in that complicated machine called society. The topography of the country is such, and the aspect of the stream so peculiar, as to warrant the supposition that it had repudiated natural laws, ignored the attraction of gravitation, and had taken its course over a gentle acclivity, which has the effect to get lo HISTORY OF LOWEI.L itself rc'jjiuliatecl in turn by those same laws, as it leaves its bank through every depression, and riiins much of the adjacent soil by the creation of swamps, marshes and lagoons. Thus it is with individual idleness, disfiguring the course of life with waste places, while the sedges, rank water-weeds and ugly filthy reptiles represent the vices, little and great, the fungi bred by indolence, — a parasitic growth. The stream whose natural viciousness Mr. Meader thus elo- quently exposed, breaks into belated activity at North Billerica, then lapses for a short time into slothfulness, and finally at Lowell "awakes to a realizing sense of duties, obligations and responsibilities at the eleventh hour, throws off the lethargy that has held it so long in chains, and, dashing over nearly two miles of picturesque and power- ful falls, seems to seek, and with entire success, to compensate for its former vagrant life, and finally throws itself with alacrity into the Merrimack, leaving no space between the termination of its beneficent labors and its final doom." A third stream which is included in any conspectus of the water- ways making the conditions for a large manufacturing community in this locality is Beaver brook, a sizable river that drains a considerable area in Southern New Hampshire. It reaches the Merrimack at Lowell, though its principal water powers are in the town of Dracut. The natural importance of the site on which a city was later to be upbuilt might have !)een foreseen by any observer of the seven- teenth century who could have appreciated the change in men's ways of living that would be brought about by inventions of machinery and manufacturing processes. Down the narrow defile that definitely marks its turning to the northeast the Merrimack drops about thirty- four feet in less than a third of a mile. The rapids of the Concord represent a perpendicular fall of about twenty-five feet. As a further guarantee of power possibilities a survey would have developed the existence of two good manufacturing locations on Beaver brook, within three miles of its mouth, and of smaller powers on River Meadow brook, which flows into the Concord. The advantageous character of the land in the neighborhood of till- falls of these rivers, furthermore, should imt have escaped the notice of a town planner of two and one-half centuries ago. From the present site of North Chelmsford southward the country is generally level and fertile to the junction of the rivers, though two small hills occur, one .'i short distance above Pawtucket Falls and one correspond- ing with the exact longitude of the falls. To the south the land rises gently into what is now the Highlands section of the citv. A large tract extending from the foot of Pawtucket Falls to the tongue of land between the rivers is quite fiat and by nature admirably suited for flic la\-ont of a town. East of the Concord are three moderate eleva- DEVELOPMENT FROM INDIAN TOWN ii tions, now tlie residential quarter of Belvidere, Fort Hill Park and the ground occupied by the Lowell cemetery. The portion of Dracut extending from the meadow lands nearly opposite North Chelmsford and down stream to and beyond the mouth of Beaver brook is level and tillable. Opposite the hill of Belvidere, from which it is separated by Hunt's Falls in the Merrimack, is Christian Hill, with more nearly precipitous slopes than any other of the neighborhood. Except that in very early settling the tendency was to place villages on hilltops and that the Indians had already preempted the opportunities for fish- ing at the falls, one might even have expected that a trading and industrial centre at this spot could be developed in early colonial times. Wamesit — .\ capital city of the aborigines occupied the site of Lowell before the white man came. .\s the Rev. Mr. Miles wrote in 1846: "The place where the waters of the Merrimack and Concord rivers meet had a greater relative importance two hundred years ago than at any subsequent time prior to the introduction of cotton manu- factures." As an ancient metropolis, indeed, of the American Indians this tongue of land has seemed to many writers to command more of attention and interest than as the later dwelling place of a few farmers in the colonial period. The stories of Passaconaway and Wannalancet and other natives of the neighborhood have been told and retold. Less, however, than might be wished is known of the historical origin and development of institutions among those Indian people : it is to be regretted that the English who first came into contact with the primitive culture at the falls of the rivers did not make a more accurate and voluminous record of the social, political and economic phases of their towns. Two tribes, closely allied, the Pawtuckets and the Wamesits, had their chief villages within the present limits of Lowell in the middle seventeenth century, when pioneers from the white settlements at Boston and Salem first penetrated to the Merrimack valley. The com- posite community was accotmted one of the two capitals of the Penna- cook confederacy, representing an alliance of some of the most power- ful tribes of New England. The fisheries at the falls were doubtless responsible in the first instance for the great congregation of red men in this district, for the bigness of the annual run of salmon, shad and alewives in the rivers is attested by many records. To the Indian these fish, which were most easily taken at falls, furnished not only food, but fertilizer for their crops of corn. Cowley, in his "Memories of the Indians and Pioneers of the Region of Lowell," refers with emphasis to the natural advantages of the place : "Next to the Falls of Amoskeag." he wrote, "the Falls of Pawtucket were the most noted for fishing facilities on the Merrimack river. The centrality and accessibility of its geograi)hical position also added much to the 12 HISTORY OF LOWELL importance of the i)lacc. The upper Merrimack and the jNIusketaquid or Concord communicated with a vast region of the interior: while the Inwer Merrimack afforded a safe and con\'enient channel to the sea- hoard." iVlilitarv considerations, alsn, it may he ])resumed, enhanced the importance of "W'amesit,'' as the English early learned to call the town. The Pawtuckets and W'amesits were of the class of ahorigines known in native parlance as Niimiucks. or "fresh water folk." the (Ieri\-ation of the word heing traceahle from "nipe" (still water), and "auke" (a j^lace). Accustomed to depend, in war and peace, upon the inland waterwavs as a system of travel and transportation they could not have chosen a better situated strategic centre than that where Lowell now is. Northward the Merrimack and its tributaries gave them connection with allied and friendly tribes, such as the Xashuas, Soidiegans, Namoskeags and W'innepesaukees. A trip of a few miles up river and then ;:';'(; the Nashua toward the present town of Lancaster brought the Indian voyageur to the village of the Wachu- setts. Down ri\er, in Essex countv, were their kinsmen, the Agawams. The Concord, then as to-day, an almost ideal stream tor the canoeist, afforded. I'ia a short portage to the Charles, a route into the region of the Massachusetts. With short carries, too, from the present site of North Billerica into the Shawsheen, and again near North Reading into the Ipswich, it was possible to make a quick journey to the ocean at Cape Ann. These waterways which now make pleasure trips for a few followers of the sport of canoeing must anciently have had great value as trade routes, and the focussing of several of them in the neigh- borhood of Pawtucket Falls was presumably a main factor in creating the capital of Wamesit. No Indian community was large, of course, as adjudged by ci\i- lized standards. The land, under the aborigines' superficial system of cultivating only the natural clearings, could not support a heavy popu- lation. Among the Indian villages of this part of the continent, never- theless, Wamesit had a ]io])ulation such as few white settlements of New England claimed in the se\ enteenth century. According to the estimate of Daniel Gookin, superintendent of Indian relations for the Massachusetts Bay Colonv, the associated tribes of the confederacy numbered 12,000 jjeople. Tlie capital, he states, had a population of aliout 3,000 before the white m;m's scourges of disease, alcohol and gun])owder began to be o])erative. Of the metropolis on the Merri- mack this ardent friend of the Indians wrote in 1674, just before the outbreak of King Philip's War : The Pawtuckets are the last great Sachemshi]5 of Indians. Their country lyeth North & Northwest from the Massachusetts tribe, and whose dominion reacheth so far as the English jurisdiction or C(~)lony DE\'ELOP]\IEXT FROM INDIAN TOWN 13 of RIassaclitisetts doth now extend. The}- haxe under them several Sagamores, as those of the Pennacooks, Agawams, Naumkeeks, Pas- cataways, Accomintas and others. They were a considerable people heretofore — about three thousand men — and held amity with the Mas- sachusetts tribe, but they were about destroyed by the great sickness that prevailed among Indians about 1612 and 1613, so that at this day they have not above two hundred and fifty men, besides women and children. Present knowledge does not suffice to reconstruct with an}- degree of convincingness a picture of the life that was lived among the W'amesits whose wigwams were on the Concord and the Pawtuckets who had their habitations at the falls on the Merrimack that now bear their name. Most reconstructions of the kind are fanciful rather than genuinely imaginative. It is quite possible to sentimentalize the character of the Indians whose community, indeed, preceded the pres- ent city, and some writers, reviewing with indignation the story of the perfidy and cruelty of the many of the whites toward the natives, have attributed to the whole race of red men the utmost nobility of person- ality and sentiments. In point of fact, it may be assumed, the aborigines of this district had the virtues and vices of their breed — the identical qualities that may be observed to-day among the Indians of the western states, of Mexico and Central America. Gookin, their con- sistent and patient friend, had to admit that as a race they were incor- rigible liars, that they were devoted to gambling, and that they were fond of violent dancing and boisterous revels with, no doubt, a plenti- ful accompaniment of strong liquor. Heredity, it may be added, prob- ably inclined these sons of the forest to accept more readily the man- ners and morals of the underworld of Europe than the strait courses (if the ruling class of the Puritan Commonwealth. Comparatively little, nevertheless, that is seriously discreditable to the Wamesits and Pawtuckets is of record ; and most of the evidence at hand indicates that they were by nature a peaceable, affectionate folk who deserved a better fate than that which licfell them. Coming of the White Man — Just when a white man first reached the Indian wigwams at W'amesit and mingled with its inhabitants can- not be stated. Quite certainly before the adjoining village of Chelms- ford was settled by solid church-going folk, the Indian town must have attracted some of the traders and wandering outcasts of whose relations with the natives one gets an occasional glimpse in the Brad- ford '"History" and other literature. It is one of the surprises of investigation in this field that nearly every formal settlement was pre- ceded by traders, squatters and fugitives from justice. Outside the pale of organized white society there seems to have been an element of immigrants who accepted the New World as a continent on which the restraints and customs of thi Old World cciuld be safely laid aside. 14 HISTORY OF LOWELL Of such sort, presumably, may have been seven whites who, accord- ing to tradition, lived among the Indians at the mouth of the Concord l)cforc the first English townsliip was incorporated in the neighbor- hood. The Pawtuckets at the beginning of authentic history in the neighborhood, were under the leadership of a very celebrated chief named Passaconaway, who was already an old man when the newly- arrived settlers on the coast became aware of his sachemship. This chieftain held sway at two capitals, one near the mouth of the Conto- cook, where the capital city of New Hampshire now is, and the other at Pawtucket Falls. Passaconaway's name first appears in colonial records in 1629, when he sold to Rev. John Wheelwright and associates the territory extending from the Piscataqua to the Merrimack rivers and from the line of Massachusetts territory some thirty miles into the country. The deed conveying this land was signed with the marks of "Passa- conaway, Sagamon of Pennacook ; Runnawit, chief of Pawtucket; W'ahangnonowit, chief of Squamscot, and Rowls, chief of Newiche- w anmick." ]'"requent as his contact with white people may have been, Passa- conaway remains a somewhat shadowy figure in New England his- t(iry. Instead of accurate observation of the manners and customs of the American Indian writers of seventeenth century New England, anxious to make a sensation among the home-staying folks in Eng- land, were prone to indulge in such characterizations as one in W^ood's "New England Prospect'' of the good leader of the Pawtuckets. "The Indians report of one Passaconnan," it is written, "that hee can make the water burne, the rocks move, the trees dance, metamorphize him- self into a flaming man. Hee will do more, for in winter, when there are mi green leaves to be got, hee will burne an old one into ashes, and, putting those into water, produce a new green leaf, which you shall not only see, Init handle and carry away ; and make of a dead snake-skin a living snake, both to be seen, felt and heard. This I write but upon the report of the Indians who confidently afifirm stranger things." Equally sensational and analoguous to the yellow journalism of to-day, is a description of Passaconaway given by Thomas Morton, of Merrymount fame. This imaginative chronicler declares : That Papasiquinco, Sachem or Sagamore, is a Powow of great estimation amongst all kind of salvages. At their revels, which is a time when a great company of sahages meete from several parts of the country in amity with their neighbors, he hath advanced his honor in his feats of juggling tricks. Hee will endeavor to persuade the spectators that hee will goe under water to the further side of the river too broade for anv man to undertake with a breath, which thinsr hee DE\'ELOP2^IEXT FROM INDIAN TOWN 15 performed by swimming over, and deluded the company witli casting a mist before their eise that see him enter in and come out, but no part of the way hee has been scene, Morton continues : Likewise by our EngHsh in the heate of summer, to make ice appear in a bowle of faire water. First, having the water set before him he hath begun his incantations, and before the same has bin ended a thick cloud has darkened the aire, and on a sodaine a thunder-clap has been hearde, and in an instant he hath showed a prime piece of ice to fioate in the middle of a bowle, which, doubtless, was done by the agility of Satan, his Consort. \\'hatever devilish viles may have been attributed to Passacon- away, he appears never to have shown toward the colonists anything but pacific and conciliatory disposition. In 1632 he captured and delivered to Governor John Winthrop an Indian who had killed an English trader. Ten years later, at a time when there was widespread fear of an Indian conspiracy, the authorities at Boston sent some forty armed men to disarm the leader of the Pennacook confederacy. They failed to find Passaconaway, but arrested his son Wannalancet, his squaw and child. It might have been supposed that such treatment would enrage the chieftain. He held his temper, however, and pres- ently he accepted an apology from the government for the indignities that had been put upon him. About 1660, when he thought the end of life was at hand (though he actually lived on for nine years more), he renounced his sachemship to Wannalancet in an address which, as reported by the English, has often been quoted. Counseling his people to seek and keep the friendship of the white man, the aged sachem is alleged to have said : Hearken to the words of your father. I am an old oak that has withstood the storms of more than a hundred winters. Leaves and branches have been stripped from me by the winds and frosts. My eyes are dim. My limbs totter. I soon must fall. When young no one could bury the hatchet in a sapling before me. My arrows could pierce the deer at a hundred rods. No wigwam had so many furs, no pole had so many scalp locks as Passaconaway's. Then I delighted in war. The whoop of the Pennacooks was heard on the Mohawk, and no voice so loud as Passaconaway's. The scalps upon the pole in my wigwam told the story of Mohawks' suffering. The English came. They seized the lands. They followed upon my footpath. I made war upon them, but they fought with fire and thunder. My young men were swept down before me when no one was near them. I tried sorcery against them, but they still increased and prevailed over me and mine. I gave place to them and retired to my beautiful island, Naticook. I that can take the rattlesnake in my palm as I would a worm without harm, ( I that have had communication with the great spirit, dreaming and awake), I am powerless before the palefaces. i6 HISTORY OF LOWELL These meadows they shall lurn with the pluugh. The^e forests shall fall by the axe. The palefaces shall live upon your hunting grounds and make their villages upon your fishing places. The Great Spirit says this, and it must be so. \\ c are few and powerless before them. We must bend before the storm. Peace with the white man is the command of the Great Spirit, and the wish, the last wish of Passacon- away. The Wamesits and Their White Neighbors — The first resort of white men to the Indian villages of Wamesit and Pawtucket, as already suggested, was presumably on account of trade. Skins of beaver and other fur-bearing animals were an important factor in the commerce of the new colony. Before 1640 traders had ascended the Merrimack to Concord. It is a safe conjecture that the traffic with the Indians at the falls reached considerable proportions l)y the middle of the century, for its unregulated character attracted the notice of the governing class of the colony, and in 1657 Major Simon Willard and three others were granted, in consideration of a payment of £25, the exclusive right to trade with the Indians on the Merrimack river. That, however, which most definitely brought Wamesit into his- torv was the series of tireless efforts made by John Eliot and Daniel Gookin to replace the native culture with Christian habits and beliefs. Souvenirs of this missionary work remain in the nomenclature of the Lowell of to-day. No chapter of colonial annals is more creditable to the New England conscience at its best than this which covers the noble but unsuccessful plan of assimilating instead of extirpating the original owners of the country. The Rev. John Eliot, of Roxbury. who, so far as known, first visited Pawtucket Falls in 1647 '" company with Captain AVillard, of Concord, and some Christian Indians, was then forty-three years old. Since about 1632 he had been carrying on his missionary labors among the Indians, of which his translation of Scriptures into their tongues is an extant witness. The propaganda continued until there were about ten thousand "praying Indians" in New England, descendants of whom may be found in the population of to-day. After his first trip to the settlement at the falls, Eliot returned in the spring of 1648, finding "a great collection of Indians at this spot, a famous fishing place, and they furnished him with large audiences of Indi;tns that came from various villages." Thenceforward, until dis- ease and other causes practically destroyed the Wamesit community, this devoted preacher was the patron saint of "the fifth praying town," which rank it held. Years afterward, in 16S7. shortly before the .\postle Eliot's death. Cotton Mather wrote: "There are six regular churches of baptised Indians in New England, and eighteen assem- blies of catachumens professing the name of Christ. Of the Indians DEVELOPMENT FROM INDIAN TOWN 17 there are t\venty-ft)ur preachers of the word, and four English who preach the Gospel in the Indian tongue. Eliot did much for the Indians in and about Pawtucket Falls, where he preached to them and finally established a mission place and installed as pastor a native preacher named Samuel." Major-General Daniel Gookin, who next to Eliot figures as the best friend and protector of the Pawtucket and Wamesit Indians, was an Englishman who had settled in \'irginia before coming to New England. He took up residence in Cambridge in 1644. He was chosen to be captain of the local military company and was elected to the House of Deputies. In 1656 he was made superintendent of all Indians in the colony's jurisdiction. About this time he visited England and, as an authority on the Christianizing of the aborigines, received many attentions from Cromwell and other leaders of the Commonwealth. The success of the missionaries at the falls was furthered by the friendly disposition of Wannalancet, son of Passaconaway, who suc- ceeded to the sachemship of the Pennacook confederacy upon his father's abdication in 1660. This leader, one of the finest characters developed by his race, never in his long lifetime permitted the ill- treatment and indignities to which he was subjected to goad him into a hostile attitude toward the English. Some years after Eliot had begun to preach in the neighborhood, he announced his personal con- version to Christianity in a manner which was reported by Gookin as follows : Here it inay not be impertinent to give you the relation following : May 5th, 1674, according to our usual custom, Mr. Eliot and myself took our journey to Wamesit, or Pawtuckett ; and arriving there that evening. Mr. Eliot preached to as many of them as could be got together, out of Mat. xxii :i-i4, the parable of the king's son. We met at the wigwam of one called W;'.nnalancet, about two miles from the town, near Pawtuckett falls, and bordering upon Merrimak river. This person Wannalancet, is the oldest son of old Passaconaway, the chiefest sachem of Pawtuckett. He is of a sober and grave person, and of years, between fifty and sixty. He hath always been loving and friendly to the English. Many endeavours have been used several years to gain this sachem to embrace the christian religion : but he hath stood off from time to time and not yielded himself u]) i)ersonally, though for four years past he hath been willing to hear the word of God preached, and to keeji the Sabbath. A great reason that hath kept him ofif, I conceive, hath been the indisjiosition and averseness of sundry of his chief men and relations to pray to God; which he saw would desert him, in case he turned christian. But at this time. May 6th, 1674, it pleased God so to influence and overcome his heart, that it being proposed to him to give his answer concerning praying to God, after some deliberation and serious pause he stood up, and made a speech to this effect : L-2 i8 HISTORY OF LOWELL Sirs : — Vou have been pleased for four years past, in your abundant love, to apply yourselves particularly unto me and my people, to exhort, press and per- suade us to pray to (lod. 1 am very thankful to you for your pains. I must acknowledge, said he, I have, all my days, used to pass in an old canoe (alluding to his frequent custom to pass in a canoe upon the river), and now you exhort me to change and leave my old canoe, and embark on a new canoe, to wdiich I have hitlicrto been unwilling: but now I yield myself up to your advice, and do engage to pr:i\ til Odd hereafter. Tills his professed subjection was well pleasing to all that were present, of which there were some luiglish persons of qitality ; as Mr. Richard Daniel, a gentleman that lived in Billerica about six miles off, and Lieutenant Henchman, a neighbor at Chelmsford, besides l^rother Eliot and myself, with sundry others, English and Indians. Mr. Daniel, before named, desired brother Fallot to tell this sachem from him, that it ma\- be, while he went in his old canoe, he passed in .-i quiet stream ; but the end therci.if was death and destruction to soul and body. But now he went into a new canoe, perhaps he would meet with storms and trials, but yet he should be encouraged to perse- vere, for the end of his vovage woidd be everlasting rest. Moreover, he and his people were exhorted \>\ brother Eliot and myself, to go on and sanctify the sabbath, to hear the word, and use the means that God hath appointed, and encourage their hearts in the Lord their God. Since that time I hear this sachem doth persevere, and is a constant and diligent hearer of God's word, and sanctifieth the sabbath, though he doth travel to W'amesit meeting every sabbath which is above two miles; and though sundr\- of his ])eopIe have deserted him since he subjected to the gospel, yet he continues and ]iersists. Fi-om records of eye-witnesses like the foregoing, and from tradi- tions tli;it ha\e been handed down in families of the neighborhood, a fairh \i\id ])icture of Eliot's mission among those peaceful Indians might be drawn. About 1633 a log chapel was built for the apostle on Meetinghouse Hill, believed to have been on the edge of the jjresent South Common. This structure appears to have been used for a school on weekdays and as a church on the Lord's day. It is recorded to have been a story and one-half high, having an apartment for lodging the preacher during his stay. In it John Eliot conceivably ma\-, as related, have entertained the Jesuit Father Gal)riel Dniillettes, who was ttndertaking among the Maine Indians a w<.)rk of conversion not dissimilar to that of the Protestant missionary in the Bay State. The work of teaching the natives to read and write was done by an Indian named Samuel. It was part of the colony's policy to sub- stitute civil law for the suiireinacy of the sachems. Somewhere near the ])resent Boott canal a nati\e magistrate, John Xum])how by name, who frequently figures in deeds and other records, held court in a log cabin. The chajiel in which John F.liot ])reached to the Indians remained ;')) silii down to 1824, according to a statement made by Charles Cow- lev in an address delivered at the Eliot Congregational Church on 1. Tlu-OUl Inirki'r I l.msr, lin:it."il in l llil Fi-i i \ K.ia.l ii.'iil- I '.i \\ I nek. I I ;,iul<\ :il il. :;. Ilildreth llciiiHsti-uil. iiiiir lliliin-di St. ami Aikt-ii A\.', l.uill in ITsI :: Tilt- T\ ItM' Home- te;ul. in Miildlcscx VilinKi-. larint; (.1,1 iiiiisUT lielri. I. 'I'll.' l;..\vcis ll.in-c, \Vnn,l St., the oldest bouse ill Ijowi'll, built ill lli.M;, r.. Tin- "Class" Hollsr, I 'liiirc-tou nouiivai.l, built in 1.SII2, used for teiiemuiils li.v i'lii|p|o,\ ui'h that the town authorities of Chelmsford had to consider it in tlicir ])lanning. (.)n the fertile meadow lands that border Clay Pit Brook and the Merrimack River, cjpposite Middlesex X'illage. Edward Colbmn, or Coburn. believed to have been the first permanent white dweller in "ye wildernesse on ye Northerne side of Merrimac River," h;id placed his habitation. He was not. apparenth', the earliest to cul- DE\"ELOPMEXT FROM INDIAN TOWN 31 ti\ate land on this side of the stream, for some time previously Samuel \"arnum had purchased a holding over the river, but on account of the danger of raids from hostile Indians had lived on the Chelmsford side, crossing to his farm in a boat. The settlement which thus sprung up in what is now the Paw- tucketx'ille section of the city of Lowell was destined to be during the entire eighteenth century the most considerable community within the existing municipal bountlaries. While "Wamesit Neck'" was still simply a "farm end" of Chelmsford, the parish at Dracut at the head of Pawtucket Falls was one with a vigorous religious and secular life of its own. Here are several of the oldest houses in the city. In the town records, now kept at Dracut centre, are many entries that throw light on present-day inheritances. .\s a community West Dracut was remarkable, among other things, for the prominence of the two families whose progenitors were its first settlers — the \'arnums and Coburns. Samuel \"arnum, who was a resident of Middlesex \'illage before he moved over the ri\-er, is believed to have lived somewhere about the mouth of Black Brook. He was a son of George \'arnum, who settled in Ipswich about 1635. In this town, too. as it happened, was resident Edward Colburn. Thus from very early days of the Massachusetts Bay colony were associated these two families, ver}- much intermar- ried, both of whom are intimately connected with the development of the Lowell neighborhood There is a tradition to the effect that both came from the same place in England, but this has no substantiation in any data yet discovered. To George Varnum has been attributed residence in one of three or four English "Draycottes." Since, how- ever, John W'ebl) appears to have first applied the name, this tradition is probably a fiction. It is established, at all events, that Samuel X'arnum was born in England in 1619, for in 1683 he made a deposition in which he gave his age as sixty-four. Several facts about his residence in Ipswich have been unearthed by the Varnum genealogists. His marriage to Sarah Langton, of that town, took place about 1645, and there his children, five sons and a daughter, were born. The original grant to him of I 100 acres of land "in Drawcott. on Merrimacke River," was made on January 16. 1664. Richard Shatswell. who received a large grant at the same time, never became a settler in this neighborhood, selling his land on October 7, 1669, to Thomas Henchman, who conveyed it to Edward Coburn, November 22, 1671. While, probably, Samuel Varnum was still living on the south side of the river, events occurred that must be accorded notice. The first white child to be born in Lowell, so far as known, was Tdlm \'arnum. who saw the light October 25. 1669. His grand.son. .:52 HISTORY OF LOWELL I'arkcr \ arnum. in memoirs written early in the nineteenth century, refers to a family tradition, which is probable enough, that the mother was assisted at childbirth by Indian squaws of the neighborhood who were greatly rejoiced at the appearance of a "white pappoose." Supplementary notes on Edward Colburn, or Coburn ( the name being spelled in eleven different ways in colonial records) may be given. He is believed to have been the Edward Colburn who arrived from London at Boston in the ship "Defense," Captain Bostock, in October, 1635. On the same ship was Robert Colburn, presumably an elder brother, ancestor of the Colburns, of Dedham. This younger emigrant, whose age was stated as seventeen, a few years later was listed as "Nathaniel Saltonstall's farmer" in Ipswich. It is inferred by the compilers of the Coburn genealogy that dur- ing his residence in the North Shore town in which the Saltonstalls, Richard and his son Nathaniel, were leading people, Edward Colburn owned no land and that as his family grew up around him he deter- mined to better his condition. It has also been plausibly urged that at abciut this time the removal of several Wenham residents to Chelms- ford, whither the Rev. Mr. Fisk had already gone, may have turned the attention of Ipswich residents to the fertile lands of the Merrimack valley. Edward Colburn's wife is known to have been named Hannah. Her maiden name is unknown — perhaps because the Ipswich town records were burned in 1831. His nine children were: Edward (1642- 167.1); John (1644-1695): Robert (1646-1701); Thomas (1648-1728); Daniel (1654-1712); Hannah (1656 ); Ezra (1658-1739); Joseph ( 1661-1733) : Lydia ( 1666 ). This ample progeny of stalwart sons received allotments of land in the parts of Dracut which the father had accpiired, each receiving a Int that bordered on the river. To John in 1671 was deeded one-eighth of the holding bought from John Evered. "right against the new barn bounded by Robert on both sides, the river south and highway north, reserving one-half acre about the new barn with convenient highway to new barn." The son did not receive this property as a gift, for he agreed to pay his father £55 sterling, in annual installments of £5. Deeds of property to other sons are on record, the latest being one of date 1690 to Joseph, who apparently had been selected to care for his parents in their later vears. "For divers causes me thereunto moving," wrote Edward Colburn, "especially in consideration of that care to provide for me and for my dear wife so long as it shall please God to continue both or either of us in this life I do convey imto my son Joseph Colburn mv old dwelling house in Said Dracut and upon my farm thereon, which was the Garrison House, and which he is actually possessed of. Together with a half ])art of my lot of land to said house adjoining to the land DEVELOPMENT FROAI INDIAN TOWN 33 of my son Ezra Coburn, the said land lying northeast and up the river. It is the half part of that latter field which is commonly called the Barn Field.'' The reference to the Garrison House in the deed just cited raises a problem of antiquarian interest. Mrs. Griffin, in her chapter on "Old Homes and Byways," attributes to the first Paw- tucket\ille settler the erection of the famous Garrison House near the navy yard which was razed not so many years ago during Major Henrv Emery's ownership of the property. "It was built about 1669," she states, "by Edward Colburn as a place of protection for the early settlers against the hostile Indians." Others, as for instance the author of the Lowell Courier-Citizen history, have identified this fine old house with the overhanging story, upper story, with a fort which by order of the Governor and Council of the Commonwealth, was erected in 1676 and placed in command of Lieutenant Thomas Hinch- man. Quite a different location is assigned to the original Garrison House by Maji ir-General Philip Reade, a descendant of Edward Col- burn, who places it on Varnum avenue, near Totman street. .\s quoted in the Coburn genealogy General Reade says : As Edward was the first settler north of the Merrimack it was necessary to provide against the assaults of the Indians. They roamed through the woods and paddled their canoes on the river, and the lives of the white settlers were of no value to them. He erected a Garrison House, and, with his seven stalwart sons and his sons-in-law, he was able to protect himself from thieving bands of Indians, while aid could be summoned in time of danger, when larger bands would be on the warpath. His Garrison House he left in his will to his son. Joseph. and there can be no doubt that it is still standing. On \'arnum Ave- nue, nearly opposite Totman Road, is a two-story house, which for manv generations was the home of the Coburns. The last to occup)- it was Nathaniel B. and his sons, Edmund, Howard and Walter [of the eighth generation], and it passed out of the ownership of the Coburns. It had been known as the Garrison House for five generations, and the size of the timbers, the low posted rooms and the style of building, all furnish evidence of its age. It has been remodeled, and changed by additions and demolition until but little of the original building can be found. The earlier settlers had no motive for calling it the Garrison House, unless it was one, and the later generations would not have originated the name, all of which proves it to be Edward Coburn's Garrison House. If this contention of General Reade's is correct it is quite possible that the house he mentions in Pawtucketville, and not, as has been stated, the Sewall Bowers House on Wood street, is the oldest dwell- ing now standing within the limits of the city of Lowell. As for the Garrison House on the Navy Yard road, this may or may not come under the general scepticism with which present-day antiquaries regard the numerous "garrison houses" of New England, most of L-3 34 HISTORY OF LOWELL which liad the overhang not for any reasons of protection but because that was a typical form of Jacobean house, brought from England. The Navy Yard house was certainly occupied if not built by Colonel Joseph Varnuni, grandfather of Generals Joseph Bradley and James Mitchell Varnum. Examination, it may be added, of the topographical layout of the Pawtucketville "garrison house" should, seemingly, convince anyone of the likelihood that General Reade is right in his attribution of priority to this place of residence. Old Ferry road, which evidently was the first trail from the river northward, crosses the intervale land for a few rods and then turns tc:>\vard a knoll on the further side of Flag Meadow brook. On this slight elevation, the first that is sure to be above the spring freshets, the house in question was built. Totman street, though it is ncjw a road of little consequence, was, pri(.ir to the laying out of the Mammoth road, the main highway from Chelmsford into Southern New Hampshire. At its northern end, where it de- bouches into Mammoth road, one still encounters the fine colonial farm house that was occupied by Captain Peter Coburn, of Bunker Hill fame. King Philip's War — During several years of generally pleasant relationship between the settlers of Chelmsford and their Lidian neigh- bors the only danger from hostile tribes that was scented came from the distant Mohawks, who were hereditary enemies of the Pennacooks. It was for the purpose of repelling a threatened invasion of those foe- men that Wannalancet, who had been living further up river, came down stream about 1669 and constructed fortifications on a sightly hill just east of the Concord river. The defences thus established gave its name to Fort Hill, now an attractive jiart of the Lowell Park system. Some antiquarians have thought they found relics of the original fortifications on the sides of the hill, and sharp stones unearthed there have from time to time been asserted to be arrow heads. The chieftain, meantime, occtipied, as during much of the rest of his life, the island of Wickassee, now Tyng's Island, and the home of the Lowell Country Club, some four miles above Pawtucket Falls. This place, still notable for its magnificent white pines, was a valuable cornfield and an hereditary possession of the family of Passaconaway. Wannalancet and his friends had been permitted to occupy and culti- vate Wickassee for some years past, perhaps cherishing it the more since in the last year of Passaconaway's sachemship the ownership had temporarily been wrested from them. It then happened that one of the sons of the family went surety for another Indian and, in default of means of making good, was apprehended and lodged in jail in Bos- ton. Wannalancet undertook to release his brother and petitioned for DEVELOPMENT FROM IXDIAN TOWN 35 permission to sell the island. His request was granted on November 8, 1659. ''"'^1 W'ickassee was sold to Ensign John Evered, or Webb, as elsewhere related. In 1665 an effort was made to recover the prop- erty, three Indians, Unanunquosett, Wannalancet and Nonatomenut, addressing to Governor Richard P.cllinsham and the General Court the following petition : To the most worshipful Richard Bellingham, Esq., Govr and to the rest of the Honrd Genrl Court. The petition of us poore neilmr Indians whose names are hereuntci subscribed, humbly sheweth that whcras Indians severall years we yr petits out of pity and compassion to our pore brother and countryman to redeem him out of prison and bondage and whose name is Nanamo- comuck, the eldest son of Passaconnaway, who was Cast into prison for a debt of another Indian unto John Tinker for which he gave his word thr redemption of whome did cost us our desirable posetions where we and ours had and did hope to enjoy our Livelihood for our- selves and our posterity : namely an Island on Merrimack River called bv the name of wicosurkc which was purchased by Mr. John Web : who hath Curtiously Given Us leave to plant upon ever since he hath possessed the same, we doe not know whither to Goe nor where to place ourselves for our Lively hood in procuring us bread ; having l^eine very Solicitous wh Mr. Web to lett us enjoy our said posetions againe he did condescend to our notion provided we would repay him his charges, but we are pore and Canot so doe — or request is mr. Web may have a grant of about 500 acres of land in two places adjoying his owne Lands in the wilderness, which is our own proper Lands as the aforesaid Island ever was. 10:8:65 NoBHOW in behalf of my wife and children Uh.anunquosf.tt wan.^l.\ncett non.\tomexut If the Court please to grant this petition then yr petitioner Wana- lancet is willing to surrender U]'. ye hundred acres of land yt was granted him by the Court. This petition, whose wording it may not be unfair to suspect Webb of having supervised, was favorably received by the General Court whose answer was as follows : In Ans to this petition the Court grant Mr. John Evered (Webb) five hundred acres of land adjovning to his lands vpon condition hee release his rights in an Island in the Merrimacke river called Wico- satike which was purchased by him of the Indian petitioners— also upon condition wonalancet do' release a former grant to him of an hvndred acres and the court do grant said Island to petitioners— John Parker and Jonathan Danforth are ajjpointed to lav out the grant of five hundred' acres to John Evered. Enwn Rawson. Secy. Consented to by the Deputies 15 Oct. 1665. 36 HISTORY OF LOWELL The incident certainly showed no governmental intention of being unfair or ungenerous to the natives; it may be cited as proving the favorable relationships between the races which were in process of establishment when the menace of a widespread conspiracy brought to naught the life work of John Eliot and other devoted friends of the natives. CHAPTER III. Onset of King Philip's War. All New England was affected by tiie effort which, upon his father's death, Philip, son of the ever-friendly Massasoit, made to align the various Indian tribes against the encroaching whites. The life of the communities about the mo.uth of the Concord was profoundly influenced by the happenings of King Philip's War, even though little of actual warfare was seen in the district. Chelmsford suffered hardly at all, thanks perhaps to previous preparation against contingencies of the kind. That the settlers were apprehensive during the years in which the colonial relations with King Philip were approaching a crisis is proved by an order of the selectmen, signed by Samuel Adams, clerk : 25 the 5 month 1671. It is ordered by tlie Selectmen For Severall Considerations espetialy for the preservation of jieace That with in one moneth After the Date hear of every maile person with in our towne above the Age of fiveten years Shall provid a good Clube of fotier or five foott in lingth with a Knohe in the end, and to bring the same to the metting house, ther to lea\e the Same vntill ocation fore tise of it be (found, &c.). Other measures were afterwards taken for defence in case of attack. On the summit of Robbins Hill, the most conspicuous emi- nence in the town, a house of refuge was ordered built in 1673. The colonial action of three years later in erecting and garrisoning a house on the north side of the river has already been referred to. Whether or not this was identical with the old garrison house near the navy yard which is remembered by people still in middle age, it is probable that the fortification was placed so as to overawe the Wamesits in case of their becoming restless. In the records of the treasurer of the colony is preserved a list of sixty-nine Chelmsford men who did duty at the local garrison houses between November 20, 1675, and September 23, 1676, together with the credits allowed them. The Christianized Indians of the neighborhood gave, in reality, but little cause for worry during the troublous years of the war. \\'annalancet, following his father's pacifist precepts, remained a faith- ful friend of the w^iites. Knowing, doubtless, that his people were under suspicion, he withdrew most of them to the Pennacook neigh- borhood and later to the headwaters of the Connecticut. In a period of h}-steria. however, it was difificult to convince many of the settlers that all red men were not conspiring to murder them in their beds Certain local happenings helped to explain, while they 38 HISTORY OF LOWELL certainly did not excuse, the treatment that was meteci out to the few remainingf Waniesits and Pawtuckets. (jeneral Daniel Gookin, ever a true friend of the ''praying In- dians," was anxious that Fort Hill he manned by the red men living at its base, these to he directed h}- eight English soldiers. \'aluable protection would thus be assured from marauders. Popular suspicion, however, had been roused to such a pitch that every Indian was regarded as a foe. Peril til the white inhabitants north of the Merrimack was proba- 1_)I_\' more imminent then than it was to nmst nf the people of Chelms- fiird. The lands occupied by the Colnirns and \'arnums were close to the river and almost directly opposite the reservation which the Gen- eral Cuurt had provided for the Indians. So long, however, as there was no restlessness among these "praying Indians," the farmers' only danger was from wandering skulkers. It was probably some such band of vagrants which, on April 15, 1675, fired on and killed two of Samuel Varnum's sons, young fellows, who were crossing the river in ;i boat. Only a few weeks previous Joseph Parker, of Chelmsford, had been waylaid and shot to death in the fcirest. These mishaps tended to increase apprehension. Then a still mure alarming situation developed. "Mar. 18 1676," according to Drake's "Indian Wars," "at Chelmsford the said W'amesit Indians fell upon some houses on the north side of the river, burnt down three or four that belonged to the family of Edward Colburn : the ."^aid Colburn with Samuel \'arnum his Neigh1)or being pursued as thev j.iassed over the River to look after their Cattell on that -Side of the River." The attributi(]n (jf this dut- rage to the "praying Indians'' was quite ]irobal)ly mistaken, Init it indicates the temper of the time. Symptomatic of the general state of fright is a Billerica letter, now preser\-ed in the Massachusetts Archives, which under date of December 25, 1675, reports that scouts have found three houses burnt "near where Joseph Parker was formerly shot." It is stated that Indians have been seen from Billerica. lurking on the west side of the Concord, and that the sumke iitr;iry to the iniiirl of the bench. The jury alleged they ONSET OF KING PHILIP'S WAR 41 wanted evidence, and the prisoner plead that his gun went otY by accident ; indeed, witnesses were mealy-mouthed in giving evidence. The jury was sent out again and again by the judges who were much unsatisfied with the jury's proceedings; but yet the jury did not see cause to alter their mind, and so the fellow was cleared. When this incident was reported at Wamesit the natives, thinking that their destruction might come at any moment, fled for a second time, leaving six or seven old folk and invalids. As a crowning infamy white men of the neighborhood set tire to the wigwams in which these helpless people had been left, and the invalids were burned to death. Lieutenant Richardson, \\ho had apjieared as the friend of the Indians in these jiathetic events, retired, jierhaps in disgust, from the region of Wamesit Neck in the fciUowing spring and became a resident of Charlestown. His knowledge of Indian affairs was destined to bring him to his untimely death. In the spring of 1677, when the set- tlers of the Province of Maine were alarmed by Indian raids, the lieu- tenant and Captain Benjamin .Swett were sent by the Alassachusetts Governor in command of a body of forty white soldiers and two hun- dred friendly Indians to the Kennebec river. Landing at Black Point, in Scarborough they were ambushed and both cajjtain and lieutenant slain. From the eight children of this member of the Richardson family, all born at Chelmsford, have come many descendants. The oldest son, Thomas, married Hannah Colburn, daughter of Edward Colburn, and settled near his father-in-law. having purchased an eighth part of the "farme of Capt. Webb," lying along the river where the present Pawtucket boulevard is. The Wamesits did not return to their settlement until after the war. How cruelly they suffered under the suspicion and brutal treat- ment which took the place of ordinary humanity in the white man's conduct is proved by a quite pathetic letter written by Simon Betokom, one of John Eliot's pupils. It is signed with the marks of Numphow, their magistrate, and John a Line, wdio wrote: To Mr. Thomas Henchman, of Chelmsford. I, Nunphow, and John a Line, we send a messenger to you again ( Wecoposit ) with this answer, we cannot come home again, we go towards the French, we go where Wannalancet is: the reason is we went away from our home, we had help from the Council, but that did not do us good, but we had wrong by the English. 2dly. The reason we went away from the English, for when there was any harm done in Chelmsford, they laid it to us. and said we did it, but we know ourselves we never did harm to the English but we go away peaceably and quietly. 3dly. ."^s for the Island, we sav there is no safety for us, because many English be not good, and may be they come to us and kill us as in other case. We are not sorry for what we leave behind, but we are sorry the. English have driven' us from our nraving to God and our teacher. We did 42 HISTORY OF LOWELL begin to understand a little of praying to God. We thank humbly the Council. We remember our love to Mr. Henchman and James Rich- ardson. Ill-prepared for a sojourn in the wilderness, these faithful friends (if the colonists are believed to have undergone great hardshi{)s in their wanderings toward the headwaters of the Connecticut. The town of Chelmsford underwent some pecuniary loss on account of the war. Upon petition to the General Court for relief the following order was granted : "In answer to the petition of the select- men of Chelmsford, &c., it is ordered that Chelmsford be allowed and aloted the sum of fivety three pounds, seven shillings and one penny out of their last term county rates towards their losses." One man, at least, from the farms that occupied jjarts of the city of Lowell lost his life in service against the hostile Indians to the southward. Edward Coburn, Jr., who had come with his father from Ipswich to a share in tile Webb property in Pawtucketville was of a militia company that went into the action at Sqiiakheage, now Brookfield. The circum- stance leading up to this affray was that in July, 1675, a band of Nipnucs from King Philip's district fell upon the village of Mendon and murdered four or five people. A punitive expedition was sent after them consisting of some twenty men in charge of Captains Wheeler and Hutchinson. These were ambushed near the present Brookfield by a band of upwards of 200 Indians and several of the white men were slain. Last Years of the Indian Community — The death of King Philip, on .Xugust 12, 1676, liruught tu an end a period in which fifty-three towns (if the English were wholly or partly destroyed, upwards of fioo lives of white people lost and an indebtedness of more than half a million dollars incurred by the colonists. To the Indians, whether hostile (ir friendl}-, the losses due to the war were irreparable. The life work (if Jdhn Eliot and Daniel Gookin was undone not only at Wame- sit, hut in the entire Commonwealth. At the outbreak of the trouble it was estimated that there were about 10,000 praying Indians in New England. Thereafter this element of the population rapidly faded away. Most of the separate communities were broken up, though many individuals, of course, became members of the white townships, it is perhaps true that there is to-day more Indian blood among old New England families than has sometimes been conceded. Other- wise nothing but a menKjrv remains of one of the most creditable undertakings of the Puritan governing class. Wamesit. as an Indian town, did not, ne\'ertheless, immediately disappear fnun the map. Wamialancet presently returned to his former haunts and sought out the Chelmsford minister to compare experiences. A familiar anecdote, which may have as much historical ONSET OF KING PHILIP'S WAR 43 foundation as the majority of such sayings, represents him as asking Mr. Fiske whether the town had suffered much during the war. When the clerg\-man replied. "Thank God, no," "Me next," asserted \\'anna- lancet. Taking advantage of the grant that had been made him in 1665, the (-liieftain with a numher of his Pawtuckets returned to the island and came under the personal protection of Colonel Jonathan Tyng, of Dunstable, their nearest neighbor. There is an indication of this good man's watchfulness for their interests in a communication received by the colony's Governor and Cc)uncil on March 24, 1677, signed by James Parker, who wrote "from Mr. Henchman's farme ner Meremack, hast post hast." Describing a warning against prowling Mohawks, Parker wrote : To the Honered Govner and Counsell. This may informe youer honores that Sagamore Evanalanset came this morning to informe me, and then went to Mr. Tyng's to informe him. that his son being on ye outher sid of Meremack River a hunting, and his daiiter with him. up the river, over against Souhegan, upon the 22nd day of this instant, about ten of the clock in the morning, he discovered 15 Indens on this sid of the river which he soposed to be Mohokes by their speech, and he having a canow ther in the ri\"er, he went to breck his canow that they might not have ani ues of it, in the menetime thay shot about thirty guns at him. and he being much frighted, fled and came home forthwith to Nahamcok, wher ther wigowemes now stand. After some years of quiet residence on the island, Wannalancet and his surviving Pawtuckets gave up the lands they had been per- mitted to occupy and wandered to Canada, where for six years they lived among the St. Francis Indians. Here the sachem, now aging fast, might have breathed his last, but that in 1692, in a time of peril due to King William's War, white peo])le living in and about Chelms- ford suddenly remembered what, a friend and protector he had been during the previous era of hostilities. It seemed to them that again he might be able to stand between the settlers and the hostile red men. A special envoy was sent to urge the Pawtuckets to return to Massa- chusetts. With this wish Wannalancet complied and during the war was once more helpful and considerate. The last years of the old chieftain were spent in what is now Tyngsboro on the Merrimack. Colonel Tyng gave him shelter in the mansion, still standing, near a fine bend in the river, and here for four years Wannalancet wandered about the grounds and exchanged remi- niscences with his white friend. When he died he was buried in the Tyng cemetery. Over a boulder in this burying ground, in whose shadow, according to tradition, he often used to sit in warm weather, the Societv of Colonial Dames of Massachusetts has placed a tablet bearing this inscription : "In this jjlace lived during his last years. 44 HISTORY OF LOWELL and (lied in 1696, Wannalancct, last sachem of the Merrimack River Indians; Son of Passaconawaj'. Like his father, a faithful fri'^nd of the early New Eng-land Colonists.'' W'annalancet outlived by some years the two great white men who had rejoiced in his conversion and friendliness. John Eliot died in i6yo. "He had the mortification," Cowley writes, "to see the labors (if more than 40 years terminate in failure. He lived to witness the fourteen Christian towns which he had organized reduced first to seven, and afterwards to five : and e\'eii these were not lc)ng to survive. Much of his time, toward the close of his life, was spent in promoting educatiiin among the negroes, many of whom were now living in the colony as slaves." Daniel Gookin, who had l>een made major-general in 1681, died in poverty in 1687, a year after he had been deposed from his office through the dissolution of the charter. Cowley pays this tribute to his memnry: "Though a man of some bigotry and many prejudices, his understanding was excellent, his integritv inflexi- l)le, his patriotism disinterested, his piety exemplary, his religious and [iiilitical principles firm and uncliangealile : he was zealous, active and l)enevolent, and a true friend to the Indians who mourned his death with unfeigned sorrow." X CHAPTER IV. The Wamesit Neck Proprietorship. Indian occupancy of lands situated close to one of the most valu- able fishing privileges in New England could hardly have continued into the eighteenth century. It was the way of the white man. in normal times, to buy for a pittance what, in case of refusal, he would have taken by the sword. By 1685 residents of Chelmsford were already taking steps to pur- chase the title of the Wamesits and Pawtuckets to the reserved tri- angle between the two rivers. The deal, which was doubtless fair enough of its kind, was consummated by Jonathan Tyng, of Dun- stable, and Major Henchman, of Chelmsford. It was followed by the allotment of the property, covering practically all the older part of the city of Lowell to fifty proprietors. This proprietorship continued for nearly a century, and the record book of its transactions, preserved by descendants of Benjamin Parker, the last survivor of the original pro- prietors, gives more information than, perhaps, any other single docu- ment regarding the settlement of the district whose apexes were Middlesex Village, North Billerica and the point of confluence of the rivers. The "fifty associates." as they might be called in modern legal par- lance, who acquired the Neck, and who with the original settlers in Billerica east of the Concord, and in the Centralville and Pawtucket- ville districts of the old town of Dracut, may be termed the fathers of the city-to-be, were as follows : Worshipful Jonathan Tyng Esq. (of Dunstable), Major Thomas Hinchman Ensign John Fisk Sergt. Josiah Richardson (of Chelms- ford) Mr. Moses Fisk, Mr. Thomas Clark, Josiah Richardson Junr. Jerameel Bowers, James Richardson, Thomas Parker Solomon Keyes Joseph Parker Sen. Joseph Hide Edward Spaldin Senr. Stephen Peirse Benj. Parker Moses Parker .•\ndrew Spalden Eliezer Browne William Underwood Nathaniel Howard Junr Jno. Wright Junr. Jno. Porrum Jno. Spaldin Junr. Joshua Fletcher Benj. Spaldin Joseph Spaldin Joseph Farwell Solomon Keyes Senr. Peter Talbot Jno. Kidder Wm. Fletcher Samuel Foster Junr. Edward Foster Samll Foster Senr. Jno. Steevens Nathaniel Butterfield Samuel Buttertield, Joseph Butterfield Jno. Spalden Sen. Jno. Shijjley Mr. Cornelius Waldo Senr. Geo. Rob- bins Jno. Parker Jno. Balde Gorsham Proctor Peter Proctor Isaac Parker Abraham Parker. Two separate purchases of special interest should be noted. Wannalancet's old planting field at Middlesex Village, whence he used to go two miles to hear John l'"liot preach in the log cha])cl on 46 HISTORY OF LOWELL Meeting Hcjitse hill. \\a^ hmight hy Major Henchman on November i8, 1685. This was a tract of about thirty acres which is descrilied as being "south of Merimack river at a place called Neahambeak near Wamesit upon Black brook — Ijounded by Merimack river on the North Hinch- man land on ye west it contains that whole corn field fenced in with ditch & otherwise that was broken & improve for some years l:)y said Sachem Wanalansit & by his sonnes & by his men it lying near to the old Indian fort in that place." At the east end of the Wamesit pur- chase was another Indian field which was bought by Jerathmeel Bow- ers "for 3 pounds & also much former kindness" on June y. 1686. Even after those sales of the acres horn which their ancestors had dominated Central New England, a few of the Wamesits and Paw- tuckets lingered in the neighborhood. The last vestige of their owner- ship of land im which Lowell is now built was removed bv a deed of 1 7 14 conve^'ing to John Borland, a farmer in the district now called Belvidere and then a part of Billerica, about 250 acres to which hereto- fore the W'amesits had had a chum. This con\'eyance grew out oi an earlier one, of May 11, 1701, by which James Meinzies, of Boston, had sold to Borland some 930 acres of the grant originally made to Mar- garet Winthrop. As some of this land was held by Indians Borland's title was defective, and under the law he could acquire this part of the property only by special permission of tlie General Court. To perfect the Borland title it accordingly was decreed that Colonel T}'ng might represent the colony in purchasing these acres from the Indians and thus perfecting John Borland's title. In 1714 Tyng completed the transactions. The final deed, though long, is so replete with local interest, that it may well be set forth in entirety : To all People to whom these prsnts shall Ccime Greeting, Know ye. that Wanalansit Sachem, John Numphow, Sam Numphow, John Aline, Simon Bitticum and John Conaway Indians, formerly both they and theire predecessors, the Ancient Inhabitants of Weymosit wch lyeth at the mouth of Concord River in the County of Middx. in the Massachusetts Bay which is in his Majesties Territory and Dominion of New England For and in Consideration of Several Sums of money vfe goods To the value of Twenty Three pounds To them and to Each of them (being Severally Divided) well and truly paid by Jonathan Tyng of Dunstable, Esqr. the receipt whereof the sd. Indians Severally Each prson for him Selfe Do by these prsnts acknowedge and there- with to be fully satisfyed Contenled and paid and thereof and of Every part & parcel thereof Do fully- freely Clearly and absolutely acquit Re- lease and Discharge the said Jonathan Tyng his heirs and assnes for Ever by the prsents grant bargain & sell, have granted, bargained & sold and by these presents do fully freely clearly & absolutely alien, Enfeofi'e and Confirme To ye sd Jonathan Tyng, and to his heaires and assignes for ever Two several parcels of Land lying at Weymesit by the mouth of Concord River, and it lyeth on both Sides of Said River, one parcel of it lyeth on ye East Side of Concord River, and Contain- THE WA^FESIT XKCK PROPRIETORSHIP 47 ing the old Planting ground that said Indians them Selves and their predecessors wth theire Associats, have for very many years Improved by planting and Fishing, and Dwelling thereupon, which parcell of land Contains about Two hundred and Twelve acres, be ye same more or less and is bounded liy Meriinack River four Score poles and So runs in a straight Line neerest ye South to take in the Greatest part of the old Fort Hill and bounded Southward by the fence of ye old Indian Field and Westward by Concord River. The other parcel con- taines by Estimation Three Score & Ten acres be the Same more or less, and lyeth on the west Side of said River and bounded by it East- ward, and Containes only that Land which now is and for many years hath been within the Indian Ditch where ye last Fort Did stand. To Have and to Hold the above granted and bargained wth all ve privi- ledges and appurtenances to the Same appertaining, or in anv wise belong To him the said Jonathan Tyng and to his heires and Assigncs for Ever. To his and theire only proper use and behoofe, And they the sd. Wanalansit Sachem John & Sam Numphow John Aline, Simon Betticum and the rest of sd. Indians for them Selves their heires and Administrators, Do Covenant promise and Grant To and wth ye sd. Jonathan Tyng Esq. & wth his heires & Assignes by these prsents. That they and Each of them (according to ye Ancient Laws and Cus- toms of their predecessors and forefathers, and according to former Laws Established by ye Englishmen in this Massachusetts Bay, Have good right full power and Lawfull authority the premises to grant bar- gaine and Confirme To him the said Jonathan Tyng and To his heires and assignes for Ever And that he ye said Jonathan Tyng his heires and Assignes for Ever, Shall and may at all times and from time to time for Ever hereafter C[uietly and peaceably Have, Hold occupy pos- sess and enjoy all and Every part of the above granted premises lying on both Sides of Concord River as aforesd. both upland and Meadow Land wth the woods and Timber, Springs, Water Courses, and fishing places, wth all other priviledges to ye Same appertaining as aforesaid, without the Lawfull Lett hindrance Contradiction or Denyall of them ye above named Indians, or of either of them, or of any other prson or prsons whatsoever (whether Indians or English) Lawfully Claiming or haveing, any right. Title or Interest therein, or theire unto, by from or under them or Either of them, or by theire meanes & procurements, or by vertur of any Indian right or Title there unto, or to any part thereof by any Lawfull wayes End means whatsoever. In Witness whereof the above named Indian.'-, have affixed theire hands and scales hereunto December ye Second in ye year of our Lord God Sixteen hun- dred eighty and Seven and in the Third year of ye Reign of our Sov- ereign Lord James the Second — Wanalansit his mark and seal. Sam Numphow his mark & a seal. John Conoway his mark and a seal. John Numphow his mark & a seal. Joseph Aline his mark and a Seal. Signed Sealed and Delivered in the present of Jerahmere Bowers, Elizabeth Bowers her mark, Hannah Bowers her mark Middx. Con- cord Augt. 31st 1714 Before ye Court of Genii Sessions of ye Peace then & there held within & for ye County of Middx prsonally appeared Capt. Jerahmire Bowers one of the witnesses Subscribed to ye within written instrument & made oath that he was prsonally prsent and Saw the respective Subscribers vigt. Wanalansit, Sam Numphow, John Conaway and Joseph Aline Sign, Seal and Deliver the within written 48 HISTORY OF LOWELL instrument as theire Act and Deed and that he then with Elizabeth Bowers and Hannah Bowers did set theire hands thereunto as wit- nesses. Att. Saml. Phipps Cler pacs. Charlestowne Augt. 31 1714 Reed, and accordingly Entrd. by Samll. Phijjjjs Regs. With the execution of the foregoing deed the Indian ceased to be a factor in the life of Wamesit Neck, as the neighborhood was now called. The remaining aborigines doubtless were absorbed in general population. It is related that one Indian family was resident in the niirthern part of Dracut toward the end of the eighteenth century and that two or three men of the race were regularly employed to guide rafts of logs over Pawtucket Falls. How long a few Indians continued to come periodically to Pawtucket Falls would be hard to say. The wandering red men who were noted in the vicinity from time to time even after the founding of the village of Lowell may or may not have had anv racial connectiim with the Wamesits and Pawtuckets. The Indians, certainly, had not entirely disappeared even toward the mid- dle of the nineteenth century, if we may credit a writer in the Opera- tives' Magazine for February, 1842, who says: "The Pawtucket Falls and their immediate vicinity were formerly the favorite resort of the Indian tribes of the surrounding country, and annually a small and degraded band of their posterity still visit the place, pitching their tents a few rods below the falls, where they remain till the autumnal winds remind them that cold winter is near, and they must away." Wamesit Neck in Colonial Times — A century intervened between King Philip's war, which ended the possibility of continued existence of an Indian community at W'amesit, and the Revolution which marked the beginning of American economic as well as political inde- pendence, and which ushered in the era of exploitation of New Eng- land water powers. During the major part of the eighteenth century Wamesit Neck was a less important place under the cultivation of white farmers than it had been in earlier days when it was a town of the praying Indians. For a long time, indeed, the |;iolitical status of the land on which down- town Lowell is built was undetermined. The few dwellers on the grants did not even know to what town they legally belonged, though they attended church at Chelmsford Centre. Only over the river in the present Pawtucketville was there a characteristic civic centre of the type established in C(;)lonial New England. To write a longer history of Wamesit Neck or East Chelmsford, as it eventually was called, through the late seventeenth and the eighteenth centuries would be a most intricate task, and profitable only in a technical sense. Rights were sold and resold. Some of the THE WAMESIT NECK PROPRIETORSHIP 49 proprietors came and built on their holdings ; others simply used the common field for pasturage and continued to live elsewhere. The beginnings of the ownership, fortunately, are well explained in the minutes of the proprietors, to which reference has already here been made. The title page of this record book of the earliest Lowell real estate syndicate reads : "This book belongeth to the purchasers & proprietors of the Wameset neck and was bought by theire order and for theire use may:26:i687; prise 4 s." It shows that the individual lots extended from a great fence on the southerly side of the property to the river on the north and east, running into what was known as the Pawtucket meadow, extending from the foot of the falls to the mouth of the Concord along the line of the present manufacturing cor- porations. A general field, or "Wamesit Field," of evidently about goo acres, was used in common for some years for pasturing stock. Regu- lation of this usage was obviously necessary. On March 7, 1712, it was voted "that every man that hath Right or Rights in sd neck : may turn in six creturers to a Right & no more." The bounds of this com- mon field are thus described by the premier historian of Chelmsford, the Rev. Wilkes Allen, who wrote in 1820: "The north west boundary of said 'purchase' began near the head of Middlesex Canal and so on to the glass manufactory and thence running near the houses of the late Mr. Philip Parker, Mr. Micah Spalding: and Capt. Benj. Butter- field, terminated at Wamesit Falls in Concord or at the mouth of River Meadow Brook." For further identification, Henry S. Perham, in a paper before the Old Residents' Historical Association, stated that the above-mentioned Mr. Parker lived on the present Pine street ; Mr. Spalding at School and Liberty streets, and Captain Butterfield on Hale street, near Lincoln square. A tract that is still easily recog- nizable from its geological and dendrological character is called in the records the "great pine plain." It obviously covered land where the Edson and Catholic cemeteries now are. The ownership of the triangle thus bounded by the two rivers from the upper falls on each and the line of the present Middlesex Canal became so complex that the ramifications can hardly be set forth in detail. As mentioned, Hamblet stated some twenty years ago : To follow these titles separately would require an examination of nearlv all the land titles within that territory, involving an immense amount of labor, and which historically would be of little or no special interest. Nearly the entire tract of land was, for nearly one hundred years, used for farming purposes and, except in few instances, nothing of special interest was attached lo it in that time. In 1726 all the terri- tory south of Merrimack River, lying between Concord River and the Town of Chelmsford, was annexed to, and became a part of, the Town of Chelmsford. The Indian Town, as a distinct territorial district, became extinct. One of the most prominent of the settlers on the 1^4 50 HISTORY OF LOWELL Ixniiulary of tlic old Indian reservation was Jerahmere Bowers to whom in 1686 Wannalancet convyed a considerable tract of land near I'awtucket Falls. Jjowers' descendants continued ownership of por- tions of this district down to recent times. The number of jiropriettjrs at Wamesit Neck was by 1750 reduced to the following- list: Thomas Fletcher, Andrew Fletcher. Henry Fletcher, Benjamin Parker, Josejih Moors, Stephen Fletcher, Jerath- mel Bowers, Benjamin Parker, Eleazer Frost, Robert Peirce, Josiah Fletcher, Henry Stevens, Robert Fletcher, John Burg, David Butter- field, Ebenezer Parker, James Perkust (Parkhurst), John Butterfield, Ste])hen Peirce. .\mong these names are recognized of course, pro- genitors of leading families of the city of Lowell. .\ somewhat similar statement of intricacies might be made con- cerning the farm pro])erties on the Billerica side of the Concord. The tracing of old Ijoundaries is still full of knots for antiquarians. -Settlement of the lands lying just east of the Concord rix'er was about simultaneous with the occupation of \\'amesit Neck. The familiar name of "Hunt's Falls" in the Merrimack, just below the ingress of the Concord, recalls the settlement of northwestern Tewks- bury by Samuel, son of Samuel Plunt, born in England in 1605, and one of the first inhabitants of the town of Concord. The son Samuel bought 3,000 acres of land at the lower end of the Concord river and along the easterly shore of the J\.Ierrimack as far as the .\ndover line from the Winthrop estate in i6gi. It was he probably who sold to Jona. Bowers eight acres of the \\'amesit purchase, March 14, 1703. Descendants of Samuel Hunt in and about Lowell have come down through his son I'eter, who was born in i6q2, who in 1715 married Mary Sheldon. John Borland, already mentioned as a ])ioneer farmer in the Bel- vidcre district, is known to have sold a portion of his large holding to others. The name of Sprague, often spelled Sprake, comes into the record in 1737, when Jose])h Hunt, who had purchased from one of the heirs of Margaret \\'inthrcp, conveyed to Nicholas Sprake, of Billerica, a small tract of about forty acres at the falls on the Concord river. Something is said about a dwelling house and barn on the pro]K'rty. These farm buildings must have been somewhere near the east end of Church street bridge. One of the first settlers on the Bor- land land was Thomas Farmer, the deed of whose ownership has not been f(jund, but who in 1735 conveyed to his son Thomas, in considera- tion of £150 about forty acres on the Concord, a tract bounded east- erly "to a walnut tree which is a corner bound from thence running southwesterly by a long fence to aforementioned Concord River." This purchase, according to Hamblet, ran along the Belvidere shore of the Concord, Init did not quite reach the Merrimack. In 1738 it was Till': WAAIKSIT NKCK PROPRI I'TORSH I P 51 conve_\ed by the }-ouiiger I-'armcr to Nicholas Sprague, Jr. Leases of Borland land are recorded as taken out by Thomas Taylor, Jacob Saunders and Edward Boatman, the last of these expiring in 1785. After Borland's death his sons, Thomas and Samuel, occupied parts of the farm. The interest of all the other Borland heirs was bought out in 17S5 by Leonard \'assall Borland, who conveyed the whole property on January 27,. 1785. to Jonathan Simpson, Jr. Old Days in West Dracut — Over the river, where there was no problem of a "real estate trust" such as that of the Wamesit Neck pro- prietorship, family histories and holdings are as easilv followed as perhaps an}-where in Massachusetts. On the fine level tract that borders Flag Meadow Brtiok in Paw- tucketville, Thomas \'arnum, the first of six successive X'arnums of that Christian name, laid the foundations of markedly successful agri- culture, continued down to the present writing. A boy of fourteen when he saw his two older brothers shot by the Indians, the first Thomas Varnum had married Joanna Jewett, of Ipswich, and settled into a peaceful and useful life that lasted until 1739. Further down river were his brothers, John and Joseph, the former of whom, "in con sideration of Six bushells of god Merchantable Indian Corne,'' had bought of Jonathan Kidder, of Chelmsford, his right, title and interest "in a Tract of Land lying upon ye North Side of Merameck River, at a place Called by ye name of Pawtuccett falls, by estimation Five Hun- dred acres." These three brothers all lived in the Lowell of to-day, the youngest occupying territor}- toward the mouth of Beaver Brook, where the Lowell Textile School has become a landmark. The records of their many transferences of property are well established, and details of their manner of living are fairly known, as will ])resently appear. Many towns of Massachusetts were originally laid out on too large a scale ; Chelmsford and Billerica were not exceptional in this regard. As holdings were taken up in the distant parts of a township, the rigors of a long drive to church and to town meeting were resented by those most affected. Presently a nucleus of families w-ould resolve to have a parish of their own. That meant petitiiming the Legisla- ture for separate recognition. Preciselv this integration of new communities took jjlace in the wide areas claimed l)y the two towns whose original line of sc])aration was the lower Concord. That the lands lying north of Pawtucket l-'alls would ])resentl_\- be set ofl:' into a separate jurisdiction might have l^een predicted on the day when Edward Collnirn and his sturdy sons began to build their houses on the Chelmsford flats. Their ])rogeny were numerous. 'Attendance at church bv way of a ferry at the site of the present 52 HISTORY OF LOWELL Middlesex Village and with thence a long drive to Chelmsford Centre was difficult. As farms were taken up northward and eastward from the falls a certain community life began to develop ; though it was nearly half a century before the district had a church of its own. Gor- don's researches indicate a rough and ready mode of living in those years prior to incorporation, and include the discovery of a murder — the killing of a Richardson in a lirawl by one of his Coburn brothers- in-law — "and I find no indictment based on this lamentable scuffle." In i/Oi petitioners to the General Court designated Dracut as "A tract of land beyond Chelmsford, in Massachusetts, which runs seven miles eastward on the North side of Merameck River, from Dunstable line, and then six miles northward from said river." This was not, however, the first petition for corporate recognition. As earlv as i'')03, according to the C the Inhabitants and Pro- prietors of Dracutt a tract of land for a Township." Besides the section of West Dracut at the head uf the falls, two other districts of Lowell, now well populated, had their sparse early settlements in the first decades of the eighteenth century. The sandy plain extending from the mouth of Beaver Brook fell largely into the hands of descendants of Sergeant Richard Hildreth, of Cambridge and Chelmsford. The contribution of the Hildreth family toward the development of Lowell has been excellently covered by General Philip Reade. No one, indeed, has more thoroughly examined both the Dracut records and the archives of the Commonwealth than this distinguished investi- gator upon whose researches every one who writes about the Spindle City's beginnings must depend. In general it may be said that what the progeny of Samuel Varnum were to the Pawtucketville district, the descendants of Sergeant Richard Hildreth have been to the region between the east bank of Beaver brook and the summit of Christian Hill. A stock in which marked aptitude for military and political service has Ijeen handed down from generation to generation, the Hildreth strain has considerably dominated the district by force of character ever since Jtme, 1709, when Benjamin Walker, of Boston, and Ephraim Hunt, of Weymouth, conveyed to Ephraim Hildreth, of Chelmsford, for £400 current silver money of New England some 1,300 acres of land "upon Merrimack river upon a ditch which divides it from the land of Jonathan Belcher over to Beaver brook, so across being on the west side of Beaver brook, joining upon the Merrimack river." The children and grandchildren of Ephraim Hildreth were prominent in every situation that arose during the late colonial and revolutionary eras; among the descendants in the generations now living are not a few of the foremost citizens of the community under consideration. The Hildreth mansion, still standing, was one o( the solidest pre-RevoIutionary structures of the neighborhood. The en- closure in which rest the remains of many Ilildreths, Foxes, Joneses and Hoveys is one nf the relics of older Lowell to be shown to every visitor whn is interested in local history. This burying ground, still owned b\- the town of Dracut, though situated within the bounds of the citv (if Lowell, was given to the town by Major Ephraim Hildreth. His own remains were ]ilaced there in 1740. Here lie his son Elijah, who died in 1S14; his grandson. Lieutenant Israel Hildreth, who died in iS^i), and Dr. Israel Hildreth, wlici was laid to rest in 1859. Of the children in the next generation of Hildreths there rest in the cemetery: Sarah Jones, wife of General Benjamin F. Butler, died in 1876; Fisher THE WAMESIT NECK PROPRIETORSHIP 55 Ames, died 1873; Susan, wife of ilur.. William Prentiss Webster, died 1874; Harriet, wife of Franklin Fiske Heard, died 1866; Dolly Maria, wife of Colonel John Milton Grosvenor Parker; Laura Wright, wife of George Howard Pearson, died 1891 ; Rowena, wife of Henr\- Reade, died in 1913. The deed of conveyance of this ancient burying ground was placed on record by Major Hildreth's sons twelve years after his death. It reads as follows : Dracut. November 17. 1752. We the subscribers, being willing to conferm our Honored father Promise. Verbally made. Relating to the Buring place Now in Use in Dracutt. to which Track of land their hath, as 3'et, Been no titel, we therefore conferm the same by the following Record : Said Track of Land being Bounded as followeth : Bounded Esterly by the Highway leading to Robart Hildreth Ferry, the northwest corner is a stak and stones by said Road ; Thens Runing \\'esterly Eight Rods and a half to a stak and stone; Thens Runing Southerly Nine Rods to a stake and stone by the said Highway: the above mentioned sd. Track of Land Hand is and is to Remain a buring Place for the Town of Dra- cutt ; and in Testimony of the above Record being and Remaining a good and faire Titel to the Town of Dracutt of the above said Track of Land, we have hereunto set our hands the day above mentioned. Ephraim Hildreth, W'lLLiAM Hildreth, Elijah Hildreth. Entred pr Ephraim Hildreth. Town Clerk. The peculiaritv of the present jurisdiction of the Hildreth ceme- terv. it mav be added, brought it into controversy a short time prior to the preparation of this history. A threat on the part of City Treasurer Andrew G Stiles, in September, 191 3, to sell the cemetery, situated within the Lowell limits, but belonging to the town of Dracut, caused no little excitement. The case was one in which the adjoining town had neglected to pay a bill of $398.13 on account of a sidewalk on Hil- dreth street. Had the old burying ground been sold at auction as pro- posed it would have been necessary to remove the remains of General Benjamin F. Butler and his wife, to say nothing of the ashes of many ancestors of the present generation. Upon the publication of an adver- tisement of the property, including 118.037 square feet of land, in Lowell newspapers, Warren W. Fox, town counsel, promptly peti- tioned the SufYolk county courts for an injunction to restrain the city of Lowell from selling the cemetery. The essential historic facts on which the Dracut petitioner relied were as follows : Prior to 1740 the ground was dedicated to the town of Dracut to be used as a cemetery by Major Ephraim Hildreth, one of the earliest settlers. He died about'the year 1740 and in 1752 his three sons, Wil- liam, Ephraim and one other joined in a deed confirming that dedica- 56 HISTORY OF LOWELL tion. That deed is now in existence, and we have a copy of it. It states, in substance, that the land is to be used for burial purposes f(jrever. And it has been so used up to the present time, and we intend that it shall be. The town has always looked after the cemetery and has paid for its upkeep. When a board of cemetery commissioners was appointed the direct control of the place passed into their hands. The beginning of a settlement at the base of Christian Hill, that is to say of the present suburb of Centralville, dates from about the middle of the eighteenth century. In 1758 Solomon Abbott, of the fourth generation from George Abbott, of Andover, bought from John White a tract of 1 10 acres with buildings and fishing rights, a prop- erty formerly belonging to Robert Hildreth. This farm extended from the present First street to Tenth street, and from Bridge street to the crest of the hill. Abbott presently sold fifty-seven acres of his holding and the ferry to Amos Bradley of Haverhill, retaining his hillside pas- tures. One of his sons, David Abbott, owned a farm on the easterly side of the hill including the islands in the river at the foot of Hunt's Falls. These islands were known for a long time as Abbott's Islands. Another son, Daniel Colby Abbott, bought the farm on Hildreth street from John Bowers, which was inherited by his son Daniel. Old-Time Ferries — Communication between the farms on oppo- site sides of the Merrimack was by boat for more than a century. The earlier and more important ferry was that operated from Middlesex village and connecting on the further side with the now grass-grown roadway between the Boulevard and Varnum avenue that is called Old Ferry road. Its continuation, now Totman street, was the main route of travel to the towns of Southern New Hamp- shire east of the river. A reminder of the nature of the ancient ferry scenes may be seen in the Durkee house in Old Ferry road, said by some authorities to be the oldest dwelling in Lowell north of the river. It is, of course, not actually the oldest if General Philip Reade is cor- rect in his surmise regarding the nearby Coburn house in Varnum, but it at all events dates well back into the first days of the town. The records show that in 1754 this Durkee house was owned by Abraham Coburn, who sold it to Abraham Blood, in whose family it remained for more than a century. In 1856 it passed into the ownership of Wil- liam H. N. Durkee, whose name it bears. When the ferry was still operated, that is before the building of Pawtucketville bridge, the Blood house was a popular tavern at which teamsters starting north- ward on the long road to Pelham, Derry and beyond were wont to secure food and drink. The ferry which preceded Central bridge at a point just above the confluence of the rivers became one of the most famous on the lower Merrimack. Its history has been given by John M. Varnum in an THE WAMESIT NECK PROPRIETORSHIP 57 account which shows that for nearly sevent)- years the ferry was owned and operated by members of the Bradley family. Amos Bradley, of Haverhill, on October i, 1761, purchased the ferry and fifty-seven acres of land for £266 13 6 from Solomon Abbott, of Dracut. It had previously been known as "Abbott's Ferry" and, prior to 175S as "White's Ferry." Amos Bradley and his son, Joseph Bradley, owned and conducted this ferry down to the erection of Central bridge. The equit}' was conveyed by Joseph Bradley, October 26, 1827, to the Central bridge corporation of which he was president. From 1761 to 1827 this cross- ing was the only one between Pawtucket Falls and Deer Jump Falls in Eastern Dracut. The rates of ferriage in 1810 at Bradley ferry are a matter of court record, for in that year Nehemiah Bradley, brother of Joseph Bradley, was licensed as ferryman by the Court of Common Pleas as Concord, in the following terms : For each foot passenger, 2 c : for each horse and rider 6 c ; for each cart, sled, or other carriage of burden drawn by two and not more than four beasts, 20 cents ; for each additional beast, 4 cents ; for each riding sleigh drawn by two beasts, 15 c & four cents for each addi- tional beast; for each chaise, chair or sulkey 17 c; for each curricle 20 c; for each coach, chariot, phaeton or other four-wheeled carriage for passengers 32 c : for neat cattle and horses, exclusiAC of those in carriages, or ridden, 4 c ; for each sheep & swine i c & 5 mills, and only one person as a driver of each team shall be allowed to pass free of toll. A small ferry was operated on the Concord river near where the present East Merrimack Black bridge crosses. An Early Plan for Separate Incorporation — While the farmer folk over the river early acquired a stable town government of their own, the proprietors and others who lived on the former Indian reservation of Wamesit were, apparently, content for forty years not to know to whom they belonged. It was presumably supposed, in a general way, that they were under the jurisdiction of Chelmsford, but when the town sent to the General Court in Boston Deacon Stephen Peirce, of Wamesit, this representative was refused a seat on the ground that he was not a resident of the township he claimed to represent. Angered by this action the people at the Neck refused to pay their taxes and petitioned to be "erected into a separate and distinct town." The pro- posal was to incorporate the northern part of Billerica, including about 500 acres on the east side of the Concord and about 2,000 acres of the old A\'amesit reservation. This quest for separate incorporation probably did not please other residents of Chelmsford, for the selectmen put in a counter peti- tion urging that the Neck be formally annexed to their town. The influence of these constituted authorities of the neighborhood pre- 58 . HISTORY OF LOWELL vailed, and on June lo, 1726, the Legislature went on record thus: "Ordered that the Prayer of the Petition he so far granted, That the Tract of Land called W'amesit & ye Inhabitants thereon be and hereby are annexed to and accompted as Part of the Town of Chelmsford." Ccnnplete satisfaction appears not to have followed at the Neck since its people two years later petitioned to become a separate pre- cinct. An act to this effect was drawn, but again there was opposition from Chelmsford. Lobbxing against a measure in the Legislature was not very ex- pensive in those days, if one may judge from a payment made in 1730 from the town treasury "To Majr Jones Clark to answer his bill of Expense and time ex[)ended about getting the neck Land of from lieing a precint 03 -04 -06." This ended a proposal which, if successful, would have probably made it inevitable that the present city would lie called Wamesit, and not by the name of any "outsider" such as, of course, Francis Cabot Lowell was. One of the prime movers in the petition for separate incorporation of Wamesit was Samuel Hunt, 1657-1743, who dwelt in what was then the northwest corner of Billerica, near the falls in the Merrimack which bear his name. He and some of his neighbors in a section of the town already distant from Billerica Centre, continued to agi- tate for some kind of separate political and parochial establishment. The success of the residents of Southern Billerica in securing a sepa- rate incorporation under the name of Bedford presently led to another movement for secession. On May 13, 1733, petitioners went before the town meeting at Billerica with a request to "erect a meeting house in the center of the town or so to accommodate the northerly part of the town, upon the Town's cost, or set them oft', so that they may maintniu preaching amcmg themselves." This petition was rejected, but on December 19 following it was renewed with a request that the town "please to set them off, with two-thirds of the land lying between Andover and Billerica meeting hotise, from Wilmington line to Concord river, for a township." A committee was appointed to "view the land," perhaps with the idea of saving as much domain as possible to Billerica. This committee reported in favor of the proposal on January 9, 1733-34, and in accord- ance with its recommendations the town voted "that the northerly ;ind northeasterly parts of the Town, according to their petition, be set off as a Township. Granting them two-thirds of the land from An- dover line to our meeting house by a parallel line with said Andover line, extending from Concord River to Wilmington line (if the inhabi- tants on the southeasterly side of Shaw^hin River be willing to join with them)." THE WAMESIT NECK PROPRIETORSHIP 59 Having progressed tlius far. Hunt and his associates framed a petition to the General Court, "praying an absolute grant of this Court for their being made a Towne within these limits." Finally, on De- cember 23, 1734, the request was approved and the town of Tewks- bury was duly incorporated. It took from Billerica about 9,000 of the acres remaining after Bedford seceded. How intimately this town, which later gave up its northwestern corner to Lowell, has been asso- ciated with the progress of its urban neighbor is suggested by a mere recital of some of the family names ajjpearing among the petitioners : Brown, Farmer, French, Frost, Hall, Haseltine, Hunt, Kidder, Kitt- redge, Levestone, Manning, Marshall, Needham, Osgood and Patten. .Among these settlers Samuel Hunt was in various ways the most prominent person. He served in Major Jonathan Tyng's regiment in 1702 and participated in the expedition that relieved Lancaster. His house at Wamesit had been used as a garrison house during King William's war, 1689-97, being regarded as the most important station of its kind on the Chelmsford road. An unsigned article on "Old Houses in Lowell and Vicinity," which was published in the "Star," August 11, 1893, made special reference to the legend of a garrison house in Belvidere : An interesting relic on the estate of the late John Clark of Tewks- bury, about a mile from the Lowell line, is the hearthstone of an old blockhouse which was used in early times as a place of refuge and protection from the raids of Indians who dwelt in this vicinity. These houses were built in every settlement, and must have been especially welcome to the women and children. The upper story projected over the lower part which was strongly barricaded. There were openings in the floor above, so that those inside could fire down upon the intruders if they came beneath with lighted torches to set the building on fire, and also loopholes near the roof which seemed to let in some light and allow another chance of firing upon the foe. A trail led from Hunt's Falls, and here in the corner of the field can be seen the very spot where the cellar was dug. Mr. Clark could remember when it was filled up. The hearthstone is of granite and worn perfectly smooth. The ground is slightly elevated and commands a good view of the surrounding country. Mode of Living — The manner of life of the farmer people in the three tnwns under consideration is not so difficult to understand if one realizes that these were settled for the most part by a sturdy pro.s- perous yeomanrv of good inheritance and tradition. There was in the eighteenth century practically no lure of the cities drawing from the farms the ablest and most adventurous and leaving at home the dull of wit and feeble of initiative to reproduce their kind. The order of intel- ligence and morality was relatively high, even though one who looks for them mav find evidences of the persistence of lawless and shiftless 6o HISTORY OF LOWELL strains. Accumulation of property was usual. Old inventories of this neighborhood dispel any notion that the people who farmed on the Merrimack were, after the hardships of the pioneer years were passed, a collection of impoverished strugglers. Conditions of a settled, civilized existence were, in fact, well established before the genera- tion that saw King I'liilip's war had passed. Agriculture was, naturally, the predominant occupation. Such former cornfields of the natives as John Sagamore's planting ground at Middlesex were occupied by farmers who quickly developed com- fortable financial circumstances. Se\-eral houses that date back to the early eighteenth century, or even earlier, still attest the sound con- struction that was conventional in building at that era. The Coburn house on Varnum avenue, which may have been constructed by the founder of the family in America, has already been mentioned. Its beams have withstood the wear and tear of centuries. Of such sort, too, is the Sewall Bowers house in Wood street, situated originally on the farm of one of the oldest of Lowell families. Of age reaching cer- tainly Iiack to about 1770 is the ^'arnum homestead, on a lane leading off Varnum avenue, standing on property that has never been trans- ferred by deed since John W^ebb disposed of these fertile acres to Samuel Varnum in 1664. A boulder on Hale street, in the Ayer's City district of Lowell, marks the site of the historic Old Rock Tavern, which was originally the homestead of the Butterfield family. Refer- ence lias been made to the Hildrtth house. The manner of living on the farms was that of the time, with much more of manufacture carried on in the home than is customary in the farm house of to-day. Old inventories give a notion of the equipment of farm and household articles. Here, for example, is the inventory of the personal estate left bv John Varnimi. the second of Samuel Varnum's surviving sons, who as its first white child may be called the Peregrine White of Lowell. The list shows what a substantial farmer might easily accumulate in the early eighteenth century. Some of the Jacobean furniture thus listed, needless to say, would to-day be worth almost its weight in silver. After appraising real estate valued at £517 los. the inventory reads : PERSON.'KL ESTATE: Imprimis : The swfird, staff and apparil of ye Deceased at lo- 6-0 His RiK)ktain John Tomlinson. It was decided that whereas in the old grant "the course of the river, though unknown, was supposed to bt from west to east," proper surveying had proxed that it would have been "in- equitable to have constructed the Massachusetts grant'' and that therefore "it was determined : that the northern boundary of the Province of Massachusetts he, a similar curve line pursuing the course of Merrimack river, at three miles distance, on the north side thereof, beginning at the i\tlantic Ocean and ending at a point due north of Pawtucket Falls ; and a straight line drawn from thence due west, till it meets with his Majesty's other governments." This decision of 1740 was regarded as substantially a victory for New Hampshire. It at the same time removed for all time the possi- bility that Dracut, Methuen and the other Bay State townships north of the river would ever be allocated to the Commonwealth with which they seemed, and perhaps still seem, logically to belong. The three- mile line from the mouth of the river westward was duly run by George Mitchell, surveyor, as far as the designated "station north of Pawtucket Fall in the township of Dracut." Thence Richard Hazen took up the tape and carried the line over the river through Dunstable and westward as far as the boundary of New York. Some slight errors made bv these survevors have been rectified in our own time. CHAPTER V. East Chelmsford and West Dracut in the Revolution. The new social spirit that was evoked in Massachusetts just before and during the American Revolution is more significant, in a retrospect of Lowell history, than any listing of Bunker Hill partici- pants from this neighl:)orhood or any data of pensions granted to vet- erans of the war. The economic causes of the revolt from the mother country are, of course, to be found in the increasing prosperity and stability of just such communities as those of West Dracut and East Chelmsford on opposite sides of the "Great Bunt" of the Merrimack river. Within a century a distinctive social order had been formed, one tending to grow apart from, in essential respects, its English model. The mother cmmtry, especially when governed by a Tory ministry, was peculiarly inept at understanding the temper of such men as John Ford, of Chelmsford, and John Varnum, of Dracut, representatives of an aggressive leadership which had been created by force of character in the erstwhile feeble colony. The British ruling and mercantile classes for a long time had taken it amiss that they should meet with competition, commercial and [tolitical, in the overseas colonies. From the date of the discovery of America onward, the New World had been regarded in Europe as primarily a field of profitable investment. .Ks the English colonies grew ]5opulous and. to some extent, affluent, the home go\ernmcnt became concerned with preventing the upgrowth of just such indus- tries as later appeared at the various water powers on the Merrimack. 'Tn 1750," writes James Oneal, in "The Workers in .American History," "Parliament passed acts prohibiting the erection of any mill or engine for slitting or rolling iron or anj' plating forge or any steel furnace. Hatters were not allowed to take more than two apprentices at a time or any for more than seven years. It was made illegal to manufacture hats or woolens in one colony and sell in another. These laws were generally violated by resorting to smuggling." Pre-Revolutionary protests against the usurpations of the Lon- don government were by no means confined to the coast towns, whose trading classes were most directly affected. The attitude of the coun- try was generally one of cordial support to every policy of resistance. Tn this regard the towns under consideration were certainly not excep- tional. During the agitation concerning the stamp act of 1765, Chelmsford's declaration of rights was made through a special town meeting in the form of instructions to Colonel Samson Stoddard, then IN THE REVOLUTION 75 the town's representative in the General Court. Here is the well ex- pressed resolution : This being a time when, by reason of several acts of Parliament, not only this province, but all the English colonies of this continent are thrown into the utmost confusion and perplexity: the Stamp Act, as we apprehend, not only lays an unconstitutional but also an insup- portable tax upon us, and deprives us, as we humbly conceive, of those rights and privileges to which we are entitled as free born subjects of Great Britain by the Royal Charter: wherefore we think it our duty and interest at this critical conjuncture of our public affairs, to direct you, sir, our representative, to be so far from countenancing the execu- tion of the aforesaid Stamp Act, that you use your best endeavors that such measures may be taken and such remonstrances made to the King and Parliament, as may obtain a speedy repeal of the aforesaid act, and a removal of the burden upon trade. This attitude of consistent support of the protesting leaders of public opinions in Boston, Salem and other seaports of the Common- wealth was maintained in Chelmsford throughout the period of agita- tion. Colonel Stoddard was sent as a delegate to the convention in Boston called in the name of the Committee on Safety in September, 1768. Among the town meeting records of a national interest, this was adopted unanimously on January 22, 1773: We are fully of opinion that the inhabitants of this province are justly entitled to all the privileges of Englishmen, and to all those rights inseparable from them as members of a free community. We are also sensible that some of these rights are at present endangered. In such unhappy circumstances the only question that can be made is this: What method is most suital)le to obtain redress? Whatever doubts may arise about a particular mode, this we are clear in, that all rash, unmeaning, passionate procedures are by no means justifiable in so delicate a crisis. When a community thinks any of its rights endangered they should always consider consequences, and be very cautious lest they run into a step that may be attended with the most deplorable effects. In a somewhat similar style, a little verbose after the manner of the day, but determined in tone, instructions were drawn up for guid- ance of Rejiresentative Simeon S]iaulding.* Early Life of General Joseph B. Varnum — While Chelmsford men were thus considering the problems of their future relationship to King and Mother Country, the same subject was deeply agitating a stripling of the X'arnum family over the river. Military leadershij) in Dracut was destined to be vested for the entire war of the Revolution, and for many years afterward, in a grandson of Colonel Joseph Var- num, and son of Major Samuel Varnum. The time of the Stamp .Act agitation coincided with the beginning of the illustrious services ren- • LoweU Spalding's to-day have all dropped the "u," liul in tlif old records we sometimes find it. sometimes not. — Author. 76 HISTORY OF LOWELL dered to his town, State and Naticm by Joseph Bradley Varnum ( 1750- 1821), who subsequently became a major-general in the Common- wealth's service, who represented the Northern Middlesex District in the National House of Representatives, of which he was Speaker for two terms, and who had the honor during his one term of service in the United States Senate of being in 1814 its President and Acting Vice-President of the United States. So intimately is the name of this soldier and statesman connected with the early history of the Lowell district, and so illuminating" are his reminiscences, dictated in iSiy and published in 1888 in the "American Magazine of History," that these vie in local interest with the John Varnum journal already referred to as a source book of the jieriod. The manner of General \'arnum's narrative, which runs in the third jierson, is sometimes tinged, it may be said parenthetically, with the pompositv of the early days of the Reiniblic when almost every- body wrote and spoke in formal and solemn periods. It is, neverthe- less, a transjiarentlv sincere and very human document. Without much reading between the lines one gets from the earlier parts of it a vivid picture of a born commander of men, who as a boy so far fore- saw the impending revolutionary struggle that while others were absorbed with their daily tasks and fun-making, he was accustomed to take every possible occasion to visit Boston and study the methods of military training used among the royal troops. It reveals a young man, just married, who when the outbreak of hostilities was generally perceived to be inevitable was so much better informed than any of his neighbors regarding drill and discipline that he was chosen captain over the heads of much older and more experienced men. His narra- tive will bear quotation at se\eral points in this history. The auto- biography states : Joseph Bradley Varnum. son of Major Samuel \'arnum and Han- nah Mitchell, was born in Dracutt January 29th old stile, or February 9th new stile 1751 : his father and mother buried their three children who died in childhood ; afterwards they had four sons, Samuel, James Mitchell, Joseph Bradley and Daniel, and five daughters who all lived to be married. James Mitchell had a collegiate education : the rest of the family were brought up together with the scanty opportunity of schooling which was offered to the youth of that time in the town of Dracutt : and the opportunity was indeed scanty. At the age of fourteen, young \\arnum was already evincing these qualities of foresight and personal initiative which were later to make him easily the most eminent person of Northeastern Massachusetts. In the year 1765 the account recalls: When the famous Stamp Act passed the British Parliament and became a law, and a piinciple of liberty and patriotism was raised in IX THE REVOLUTION tj his breast, although then quite a youth, he applied himself to the study of the various systems of government in the world, and especially to the propriety or impropriety of the measures which had been taken by Great Britain towards America, which by no means lessened his oppo- sition to the Stamp Act, nor was he much elated when the repeal of this obnoxious act in 1766 took place, when he considered the circum- stances and principles in which the repeal was effected. * * * While the British troops were in Boston, transported thither with an original design of enforcing submission to the mother country, a military ardor glowed in his breast, and with a view the better to enable him- self to become useful in the defence and in anticipation of the inde- pendence of his country, he, \\\ an isolated and apparentl}- obscure situation, visited the British troops in Boston from day- to day-, for some time : after what he had acquired from that source he applied himself to the study of the most recent and approved authors upon tactics and military discipline, by which he acquired many of the elements of discipline necessary to be possessed by the soldier. This intensive preparation of y^oung \'arnum's was undoubtedly in large measure responsible for the active part which the men of Dracut took in the war that followed. "The massacre committed by the British soldiery in 1770,'' he wrote, "seemed to rouse every latent spark of the love of liberty and independence which had for some time apparently laid dormant in the breasts of the inhabitants of that town." Previously there had been but one military company in the place. Now it was proposed to form two companies after the model of the royal military organization, "and although at that time, accord- ing to the views of the people generally, Joseph Bradley \'arntmi was but a bov and quite too young to be intrusted with military command, yet having been acquainted with his manners and disposition and learned something of his military acquirements, they unanimously made choice of him for their cajjlain." Under this captaincy, drills were carried on regularly in the years just preceding the armed con- flict. It is recorded that "thcv went on harmoniously, frequently meeting for discipline, and making as much progress therein as the nature of the case would permit, until December, 1774, when the Pro- vincial Congress thought proper to continue the royal arrangement of the militia into regiments and companies as the best adapted rule of procedure under existing circumstances." AX'hile the Dracut men from Scarlet Brook to the Nickel mine, and from the Christian Hill to Black North, were thus busily prepar- ing for eventualities, their young captain was not neglecting the citi- zen's duty of developing a farm and Iniilding up a family. "In the vear 1769," he writes, "he for the first time became acquainted with his present beloved wife, that acquaintance was continued until the 26th day of January. 1773, on which day they entered into the holy bonds of matrimonv, and on the 4th day of February following, they 78 HISTORY OF LOWELL commenced the station of housekeeping at Dracut. She was the daughter of a respectable farmer in Pelham, Newhampshire, by the name of Jacob Butler." Thus was brought into the wartime activities of Dracut, Molly Varnum, after whom is named one of the Lowell organizations of patriotic women, the Molly Varnum Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution. This woman, a granddaughter of Deacon John Butler, who went from Woburn to Pelham and whose descendants are many throughout the Nation, was one of the many heroines of the difficult time into which the colonies were plunged by their effort to secure political independence. As General Varnum wrote of his consort: "Notwithstanding the cordiality and friendship which has uniformly pervaded both their minds toward each other since their first acquaintance, they have been called upon to sustain many griev- ous trials and afflictions which required Christian fortitude to sustain. For the first nine years of their dwelling together nothing unusually grievous occurred except the loss of a darling daughter eighteen nil mills old, while he was al)scnt in the army." Elsewhere the hus- band affectionately records the wife's devotion to the revolutionary cause. "Through the whole of this struggle he had the consolation iif the accordance of his beloved wife: when soldiers were called upon to go into the service who were not possessed of blankets, her feelings induced her to supply them to the best ones she had; when they wanted sheets or knapsacks she furnished them bv cutting up her sheets even to those of her own bed, relying on di\ine Providence for strength to manufacture more in their room." The home which General and Mrs. Joseph Bradley Varnum made for themselves amidst the trials oi a great war was situated on what is now Lawrence road, about three miles below Centralville. They thus cannot strictly be claimed as residents of the Lowell that was to be. So closely, nevertheless, were they identified with the develop- ment of the district which General \'arnuni later represented in Con- gress that frequent citation from the autobiography will not trans- gress the limits set upon this work of narrative and compilation. In the years following the Boston massacre, it began to be e\'ident that such prevision of tr(iul)lc as young Jose])h Bradley Varnum had experienced was no hallucination. In August. 1774, in response to a call to be represented at a provincial meeting at Concord, Chelmsford nominated as its delegates Jonathan W. .\ustin and Samuel Perham. At the meeting the former representati\e of the towm was one of a committee "to consider the late acts of Parliament." The report which was duly rendered is a long one, resounding with what John Fiske calls the "eff'ort to defend the eternal principles of natural jus- tice." It ended by declaring that "a Provincial Congress is absolutely IN THE REVOLUTION 79 necessary in our present unhapp)- situation." Said the eloquent pero- ration : "Our fathers left a fair inheritance to us, purchased by a waste of blood and treasure. This we are resolved tu transmit e(|ually fair to our children after us. No danger shall affright, no difficulties intimidate us ; and if, in support of our rights, we are called u])on to encounter even death, we are yet undaunted, sensible that he can never die too soon who lays down his life in support of the laws and liberties of his country." To the several Provincial Congresses which succeeded the Con- cord meeting and which determined many projects of moment to the Nation that was then in formation, all the towns of the Lowell neigh- borhood sent able and public-spirited representatives. At the Provin- cial Congress of Deputies which convened at Salem, October 7, 1774, Chelmsford was represented by Simeon Spaulding, Jonathan Wil- liams Austin and Samuel Perham ; Dracut by William Hildreth : Tewksbury by Jonathan Browne ; Billerica by William Stickney and Ebenezer Bridge. The second Provincial Congress of Deputies was convened at Cambridge. February i, 1775. Among the deputies were these: Chelmsford, Simeon Spaulding; Dracut, Peter Coburn ; Tewksbury, Jonathan Browne ; Billerica, W illiam Stickney. The third Provincial Congress met rt Watertown, May 31, 1775. Here again Chelmsford was represented by Colonel Spaulding. Dracut sent Deacon Amos Bradley ; Tewksbury, Ezra Kendall ; Billerica, William Stickney. As the crisis approached, Chelmsford held a town meeting at which it was voted to supply equipment to all men on the alarm list and to have ready for active service at least fifty minute-men. The meeting also appointed a committee of inspection to prevent the sale in Chelmsford of any articles imported from Great Britain. The people over the river were equrlly awake. A Dracut committee of correspondence, inspection and safety was formed on January 12, 1775, "for the purpose of communicating and securing an interchange of views upon the great questions which are agitating the public mind." This organization was effected nineteen days before the as.sembling of the Provincial Congress at Cambridge. A committee of townsmen was appointed to "examine and report upon the quan- tity, nature and condition of military stores and ordnance material, arms and equipment on hand or obtainable, for any great emergency. Report regarding same to be made to town." Four months later the Dracut records show that twelve pounds were appropriated for bayo- nets, lead for bullets and flints for muskets. This equipment was placed in the hands of minute-men subject to training half a day each week for ten weeks, "unless the last act of Parliament, the Boston Port bill, shall be repealed." 8o HISTORY OF LOWELL The Lexington Alarm — "The Civil War was begun at Concord this morning," wrote the Rev. Ebenezer Bridge, of Chelmsford, in his diary of April 19, 1775. "Lord divert all things for his glory, the good of his church and people, and the preservation of British Colonies, and to the shame and confusion of our oppressors." The alarm summons reached Chelmsford at aliout 7 o'clock on the morning of the lyth. Messengers were despatched over every road to warn the militia and minute-men of the town. The first man who may be called a pre-Lowell citizen to receive the news was, according to data contained in a paper prepared by George F. O'Dwyer in 1899 for the Father Matthew Temperance Association, Deacon Aaron Chamberlain, a soldier of Captain Barron's company, who lived on the old turnpike road near the site of the present city farm. Captain John Ford was among the first to be notified in the vicinity of Pawtucket Falls. In a short time every soldier of the Neck was on his way to the rendezvous at Chelmsford Centre. A story has it that on that fateful morning when the people of the Centre and the Neck were thus aroused by ringing of bells and firing of alarm guns, the godly pastor endeavored to round up the minute-men for a brief service of prayer in the meeting house ; liut that Captain (at that time Sergeant) J(jhn Ford, imjmtiently prcj- nounced against any such waste of time and hurried his men toward Concord. Certain it is that Chelmsford men went out in two companies, one under Colonel Moses Parker, the other under Captain Oliver Barron. These companies reached Concord in time for some of the fighting. Among the wounded were Captain Barron and Deacon Aaron Chamberlain. Captain Davis and Abner Hosmer, Acton mem- bers of the company, were killed at the liridge. The sense of exalta- tion which this event at Concord produced in Chelmsford is reflected in an entry of April 20 in Mr. Bridge's diary. "We are now involved," he wrote, "in a war which Lord only knows what will be the issue of, but I will Ii(ipe in His Mercy and wait to see His sah'ation." The two Dracut companies, coming from a greater distance^ arrived too late for the fight at Concord bridge, but joined in the pur- suit of the British troops back to Cambridge. Five men of Chelmsford achieved especial distinction at the be- ginning of the Revolution, two of wliom. Captain John Ford and Ben- jamin Pierce, lived in the portion of the town since occupied by Lowell. The other three were Colonel Simeon Spaulding, Colonel Ebenezer Bridge and Lieutenani-Colonel Moses Parker. Colonel .Spaulding, a descendant of Edward Spalding ( Spalden or Spaulding as it was variously sjjelled ) who settled at Braintree about 1632, and who in 1655 was one of the first settlers of Chelmsford, IX THE REVOLUTION 8i was in his sixty-second year wlicii the war began. His residence was at Chelmsford Centre, "'in ci\il matters," writes C. C. Chase, "he was doubtless the first and most influential citizen of Chelms- ford in the great crisis of the Revolution." He had already lieen town treasurer, 1755-66^6/'; selectman, \j(yi-(^2; and on March 18, 1755, had been commissioned cornet of the Second Regiment of the Provincial Militia. He became colonel during the Revolution. He was in the .\merican cam]) at Cambridge on the day of the Bunker Hill battle. He represented Clielmsford in the Legislature in 1770 and again in 1773 and 1774. In September, 1775, he was appointed justice of the peace. He was a member of the Committee of Safety in 1775-76. Later, in 1779, he was a delegate to the convention which framed a Constitution for the State of Massachusetts. He died .\])ril 7. 1785. Through his son. Weld Spalding, and his grandson, William Barry Spalding, he counts as one of the forefathers of Lowell. Colonel Parker, who was a veteran of the French and Indian wars, fought at Bunker Hill. He was wounded in the leg, was cap- tured by the British, and died on July 4, 1775, in consequence of an unsuccessful, and perhaps unskillful, amputation of his leg. Colonel Bridge was a son of the Rev. Ebenezer Bridge, minister at Chelmsford, where he was born April 29, 1744. A graduate of Har- vard College, he taught school for a time, and then opened a store at Billerica, whence the inclusion of his name in the records of that town at the beginning of the war. In 1775 he was chosen colonel of the Twentv-seventh Massachusetts Regiment. He died at Hardwick, New York, in 1814. Captain John Ford — The great man of the East Chelmsford set- tlement at Pawtucket Falls throughout the Revolution was John Ford, mill owner, capitalist and military jjersonage, a native of Haver- hill, where his birth was recorded as of November 6, 1738. His father. Robert Ford, is supposed to be identical with the Robert Ford who was in Lovewell's fight. A legend jjerpetuated by several historians has it that John Ford as a youtli was himself a dauntless foeman of the redskins and that after he had come to Pawtucket Falls and begun operation of a mill, a revengeful Indian appeared and threatened his life, only to be seized by the white man, killed and thrown into the rushing tail race. As there are several versions of this story, it may, perhaps, be accepted as based on fact, though one suspects the Indi.in in the case to have been one of the survivors of the friendly Wamesits, who down to the end of the eighteenth century earned a precarious living by assisting the passage of logs around Pawtucket Falls, and that New England rum rather than long cherished vengeance prob- ably supplied the motive for the attack. L— 6 82 UlSiORY OF LOWELL Just when John Ford's removal from Haverhill took pTace appears not to have been determined, but it is established that "before the Revolutionary War, Captain Ford was engaged in a large range of business. He owned a saw mill at the foot of Pawtucket Falls, near the mouth of the Concord river, and his account book shows that he dealt largely in planks, boards and other kinds of lumber. He also kept a store, furnished with a variety of West India and other goods. From 1 77 1 to 1782 he sold a great amount of luml^er to Timothy Brown, who built and occupied as a tavern the celebrated 'Old Yellow House' in Belvidere." John Ford, as has already been indicated, went to the Concord fight in the capacity of a sergeant of the minute-men. He arrived just too late for the contest at the bridge, but was among the colonials who harrassed the royal troops on the way back to Boston. In the rear- guard action at Hardy's Hill, he displayed conspicuous daring, such that Gordon, in his "History of the American Revolution," writes: "It can be fully proved that Captain Ford killed five regulars." .\ fifth man of later fame, wlmni the stir at Lexington and C<.>n- cord Ijrought forward, was Benjamin Ir'eirce or Pierce, then a youth of eighteen years, living with his uncle, Robert Pierce, on what is now Powell street, Lowell. Young Pierce, the story goes, was ploughing with a pair of steers when the news of the British invasion reached him. .\s no horse was available he set out on foot for Concord, arri\- ing too late for the fight. He continued his walk to Cambridge and enlisted in Captain Ford's com[)any. He was at Bunker Hill and re- mained in the service in Colonel John Brooks' regiment, .\fter the Revohnion. he left Chelmsford and settled on wild land in Hillsbor- ough, New Hampshire. He rose to be Governor of that State and his son, Franklin Pierce, became President of the United States. Battle of Bunker Hill — Large contingents of men from the farms now covered by Lowell fought at Bunker Hill in the companies of their respective townships. In the steps taken to raise money and enroll troops. Chelmsford, Tewkslnn\v and Dracut all adopted patri- otic action and sent their res])ective comiianies to join the force that accumulated in front of the English army at Boston. Colonel Ebenezer Bridge, already mentioned, commanded one of the regiments which undertook to occupy the heights in Charlestown. Soon after the events of April, 1775, John Ford, foremost citizen of the Neck, undertook to raise among his neighbors a company for service in the provincial army. Of this force he was chosen captain. His company, as it marched to Cambridge to be enrolled under Gen- eral Ward, was composed more largely than probably any other of ancestors of Lowell people of the present generation. Its member- ship was as follows : IX THE RFA'OLUTION 83 Captain, John Ford: lieutenant, Isaac Parker; ensign, fonas Parker: sergeants, Moses Parker, Daniel Keyes, Parker "Emerson, Jonas Pierce; corporals, John Bates, Benjamin Barret, William Cham- bers, \\'illiam Cambill ; drummer, William Ranstead ; filer, Barzilla Lew; privates, John Keyes, Alexander Davidson, John Chambers, Samuel Britton, Moses Barker, Benjamin Pierce, David Chambers, Ebenezer Shed, Samuel Wilson, Nathaniel Poster, James Dunn, Isaiah Foster. Benjamin Parker, Benjamin Farley, Enoch Cleaveland, Benjamin Butterfield. Samuel Howard, Moses Esterbrook, Robert Anger, Elijah Haselton, John Glode, Jesse Dow, Joseph Spalding, Francis Davidson, Oliver Cory, Samuel Marshall, Joseph Chambers, Nathaniel Kemp, Joseph Spalding, Solomon Keyes, Isaac Barrett, Noah Foster, Reuben Foster, Jonas Spalding, Timothy Adams, Josiah Fletcher, John Parker. James Chambers, W^illiam Rowel, Silas Parker, Benjamin Haywood, Robert Richardson, Thomas Bewkel, William Brown. James Alexander, Solomon Farmer. In Dracut the course of young Joseph Bradley Varnum's mili- tary ambitions did not run smoothly in this early period of the war. His temporary retirement to the ranks appears, however, to have been accepted in good part even though it prevented his name from being prominent in the list of those who went against the British at Con- cord Bridge and Bunker Hill. The former captain's narrative of the happenings of the spring of 1775. as they effected him, is a model of circumspect reminiscence: The volunteer companies in Dracutt being attached to good order and government, reassumed their standing as private soldiers, and the whole company thus again collected made choice of Stephen Russell as captain. Ephraim Colburn as first lieutenant, Simon Colburn as second lieutenant and Abraham Colburn as ensign. These were all respectable gentlemen considerably advanced in life, but all of them almost totally uninformed in tactics and military discipline. In order to acquire a degree of necessary information in the military art they employed the said Varnum as an instructor, both to themselves and the militia under their command, in which capacity he continued to serve them until after the commencement of the Revolutionary War, without fee or reward, while he continued in the honorable station of a private soldier in the said conijjany, and as such marched with Cap- tain Russell to the battle of Lexington which took place on the 19th of April, 1775, and up(^n various other occasions of alarm throughout the year 1775, and until the British troops evacuated the town of Bos- ton, on the 17th of March, 1776. The second Dracut company of this time was commanded by Captain Peter Coburn (1737-1813), who lived in a house still standing on Totman street, near where it joins Mammoth road, near Collins- ville. This company was among those concerned in the Concord fight and, after seven days' service, was disbanded. When a few weeks later the men were again called out. Captain Peter Coburn was in command, taking an important jiart in the battle of Bunker Hill. 84 HISTORY OF LOWELL Tewksbiiry, too, was well represented in the American forces be- sieging Boston. Most of the minute-men from this town were en- rolled either under Captain John Harnden, of Wilmington, or Captain Benjamin \\'alker, of Chelmsford. Of Tewksbury, in the Harnden company, were: John Biirt, William Harris, Joshua Thompson, Moses Gray and Samuel Manning. In Captain Walker's company were: Lieutenant, John Flint; sergeants, Luke Swett and Eliakim Walker; corporals, Philip Fowler, David Bayley and Peter Hunt; drummer, Phineas .Annis ; fifer. Isaac Manning; privates, Jcihn Bayley, Jonathan Beard, John Button, Amos Foster, Jonathan Frost, Jona- than Gould, John Hall, Nehemiah Hunt, Josiah Kidder, Eliphalet Manning. Joseph Phelps, Samuel Ba^de}-, Job Danderly, Timothy Dutton, Jacob Frost, Joseph Gray, John Howard, Paul Hunt. .Xsa Laveston. Daniel Merritt, Hezekiah Thorndike. Without undertaking to retell the story of the struggle between British and colonials for possession of the heights in Charlestown, we may notice here a little known circumstance of the period of prepara- tion just before the assault on the breastworks. That Bunker Hill battle was fought behind pro])erly prepared redoubts instead of from the bare hilltop, and that, therefore, the American forces secured the encouragement of success through continuing as long as their |)owder lasted was due in large measure to the military perspicacy of the leader of the company from East Chelmsford. Of Captain Ford's par- ticijiatiiin in this affair, Mr. Chase wrote: ( )n the dav before the battle he volunteered to carrv from Cam- l)ridge to Bunker Hill a message from General Ward. To do this he must pass over Charlestown Neck in the range of the British guns, at the imminent peril of his life. He had orders from General ^^'ard to dismcnmt from his horse at the neck and cross on foot to escape iil)^er\ atinn. But he ran the risk and passed and repassed on horse- liack. While at Bunker Hill he warned General Prescott that from movements of the enemy it was evident that they were preparing to attack the Americans on the hill, and urged the necessity of imme- diately throwing up breastworks and redoubts. Prescott, who had not foreseen such an attack, yielded to the persuasion of Captain Ford and before the morning of the battle the breastworks were completed, without which the Americans could not have held their ground or achieved the immortal glory of that illustrious day. Early on the day of the assault at Charlestown, it may iie added. Captain Ford's company pushed ahead of the rest of their regiment. On arrival the captain was ordered by General Putnam to take charge of the operation of two field guns. John Ford at first objected that his men while good shots with the rifle knew absolutely nothing aliout the handling of artillerv. .\s the Connecticut general, however, per- sisted. Captain Ford obeyed like a good soldier, and his amateur artil- IX THE RH\-()LUTIO.\" 85 lerists gave a good account of themselves, even though they burst one of the guns at the eleventh shot. The valor displayed by Captain Peter Coburn, of Dracut, in the fierce fighting that followed is a matter of familiar record. He is said to have been the last man to speak to General Warren before the gal- lant commander fell. "As the Americans were about to retreat a Brit- ish ofificer sprang upon the breastworks and waved his sword encour- aging his men. Captain Peter, hurling a huge stone, knocked him backwards, and then followed his men in the retreat." He is said to have come back to Dracut with eleven bullet holes in his clothing and not a wovmd on his person. The mortality among the men from the Merrimack was consider- able at Bunker Hill. An important loss to the Revolutionary cause, as already indicated, was that of Lieutenant-Colonel Moses Parker, of the Twenty-seventh Regiment, a lineal descendant of one of the five Parker brothers who were among the original settlers of Chelms- ford. Colonel Parker was taken wounded by the British to Boston, where he died as a result of the amputation of his leg, on July 4, 1775. In the retirement from the hill. Captain Ford found among the wounded his neighbor. Captain Benjamin Walker, of the Second Chelmsford Company, whom he carried on his back for some forty rods. As it soon became evident that both men would be captured. Ford dropped his burden at Walker's request and escaped o\er Charlestown Neck. Captain Walker, like his fellow-townsman. Colo- nel Parker, died in prison from the effects of his wounds and, presum- ably, from lack of care. In the battle. Colonel Bridge's regiment had fifteen killed and twenty-nine wounded. During the siege of Boston that followed the battle of Bunker Hill, it became evident to the men at Pawtucket Falls as elsewhere that a long war was ahead. Captain Ford and most of his men. after nine months' service, reenlisted. In intervals of quiescence they were permitted to return to their farms for needful o])erations. They joined in the expedition to Ticonderoga, during which Captain Ford kept an orderlv book that is preserved by a descendant. An old enlistment agreement, discovered by Ca])tain J. P. Thomp- son, of Lowell, in 1892, indicates the seriousness with which the Chelmsford farmers took their military duties. It contains the names of several residents of the "Neck" and is to the following purport : W'e the Subscribers do hereby severally enlist Ourselves into the Service of the United Colonies of America, to serve until the fifth day of April next, if the Service shall require it; and each of us do engage to furnish and carry with us into Service a good effective Firearm and Blanket (also a good Bayonet and Cartridge pouch if possible). And we severally consent to be formed such Persons as the General Coun- cil shall appoint with a Company of Ninety Men, including one Cap- 86 HISTORY OF LOWELL tain, two Lieutenants, one Ensign, four Sergeants, four Corporals, one Drummer and one Fifer, to be elected by the Companies, and when formed we engage to march to Headquarters of the American Army, with the Utmost Expedition, and to be under the Command of such Fieldofficer as the General Council shall appoint, and we further engage during the Time aforesaid to be subjects to such Generals as are, or shall be, appointed, and to be under such Regulations, in every respect, as are provided for the arms aforesaid. Dated this — Day of January 29, A. D. 1776. Samuel Perham, Snr., Jonathan Stevens, Joseph S])aulding, Samuel Tvviss, Isiah Keyes, John Mears, William Fletcher, Stephen Peirce, the J. P. Herelujahah Fletcher, Jonas SiJaulding, Oliver Richardson, Ebenezer Gould, Isaiah Foster, Jeptha Spaulding, Charles C). Fletcher, John Spaulding, William Pierce. On the north side of the river. Captain J. B. Varnum's reinstate- ment as an officer was not long delayed after the retirement from Charlestown. "The legislature thus formed." he writes, referring to the session of 1775-76, "having now organized the militia, they divided the town of Dracutt to two companies, a choice of officers was ordered and the company to which the said Varnum belonged, both train band and alarm list, except seven old men, avowed that they had no dislike to him as an officer except as to his age." To clinch matters, young Varnum had a personal interview with each of the objectors, and agreed not to accept the tendered commis- sion if any one of them would carry his story of dissatisfaction to the presiding field officers. This "they one and all refused to do, saying they had rather submit to the choice as it stood than to be at that trouble. He then told them that if they would not be at that small trouble he should accept the command, and that he felt fully deter- mined to perform his duty without favor or partiality : that, therefore, notwithstanding their advanced years, they must expect equal with the otlier members of the company to do their duty or aliide by the rigors of the law." With this understanding Joseph Bradley Varnum took command of the company on May 31, 1776, under a commission from the government of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, signed by sixteen colonial councillors. This rank of captain he held con- tinuously during the war and until April 4, 1787, when there began a series of promotions that made him successively lieutenant-colonel, colonel, brigadier-general and major-general. In his later life he was considered the foremost authority on military matters in Congress. Rounding up "Slackers" — The difficulty with which the .\meri- can Revolution was prosecuted, after the first elation of success had passed, is reflected in the records of the towns out of which Lowell has been formed. The war which our ancestors, with help from several countries of continental Europe, finally brought to a victorious con- clusion was nowhere, except in Massachusetts and Virginia, any- IN THE REVOLUTION 87 thing like a spontaneous uprising of the people. As President John Adams afterward wrote: "New York and Pennsylvania were so nearly divided, if their propensity was not against us, that if New England on one side and Virginia on the other had not kept them in awe, they would have joined the British." "The great mass of labor- ers, artisans and small farmers," says James Oneal, speaking of the attitude of the colonies as a whole, "were indifferent to the agitation for liberty and independence." Even in the Bay State, which fur- nished a quota of soldiers quite out of proportion to its population, strenuous measures had to be taken to bring out the "slackers," and to repress the tories. Striking evidences of the efforts made in this direction in Dracut are to be noted in the town records. Thus, on February 17, 1777, Alajor William Hildreth, as town clerk of Dracut, signed a call for a meeting "To see if the town will come into some method such as they shall think most proper for the raising of men in Dracut ; for recruiting the continental army from time to time as shall be occasion ; and to come into some method for adjusting past service that persons have done in said town in defence of the country." At a subsequent meeting it was voted to give each enlisted man £30 exclusive of Continental and State bounties. Later, in February, 1778, it was agreed to "give as donation to each conti- nental soldier that went into the continental army for the Town for three years or during the war, one pair shoes, ditto stockings, and two shirts." On May 2 following there came another call for a town meeting "to engage men to reinforce the continental army and adjudge what each man shall be allowed for services in the present war; also to raise men to go into the army." In August more efforts were made to induce soldiers to enlist in General Sullivan's army then operating in Rhode Island, and on September i, 1778. it was recorded that a town meeting "raised £1535, 10 s. to pay nine months, eight mos., six mos. and six weeks men that went into the service the summer past." At this meeting the town officers were empowered to "act as commit- teemen to raise the men in this town at as cheap a wage as they can get them." .A. census, presumably fur military purposes, was held in Dracut, and reported by John Varnum in 1778. to the effect that "there was 225, 3 of which were of ve Boston Donationers, one of Charlestown, one Idiot, one distraught man that had been so for a number of years and who had lost the use of his limbs & altogether incapable of help- ing himself for sundry years past & without hopes of recovering & 4 Negroes." For the slackness in enlisting there was possibly a certain excuse in the latter part of 1776 and the first nine months of 1777. in that no considerable military operations were in progress in the vicinity, and 88 HISTORY OF LOWEl.I, that much neglected t'lcld-work demanded the services of as many men as possible. Farm help was scarce and high during the Revolti- tion, though by comparison with the prices which the truck farmer of to-day in Pawtucketville or South Lowell must pay it would seem that Squire Varnum got of¥ easy in April, 1778, when he made the following contract : "Settled a bargain with Wm Young for 6 months laljor, beginning this day. for which I am to give him a wool, home made coat, waistc(jat & breeches, two shirts, 2 pare of Trowsers, 2 pare of stockings, a pare of shoes, a hat & 10 $ for which sd W'm promised to labor for me for 6 mos from this day." When there was exceptional need of soldiers, as in the campaign to entrap General Burgoyne in the autumn of 1777T the hardy men on either side of Pawtucket Falls did not fail to respond. The call for troops to assail the British in New York State came from the Great and General Court on September 22. 1777. The towns about the Great Bimt replied promptly. The ever-reliable Captain Ford shut down his mill and prepared his company to set forth toward the northern army on September 30, 1777. The muster roll of his command in Colonel Jonathan Reed's regiment shows the following names : Captain, John Ford ; lieutenant. Temple Kendall ; sergeants, Jona- than Bancroft, Willard Parker; corporals, Silas Pierce. Caleb Coburn, Simeon Cummings ; privates, Olive Barron, Jonathan Shed, William Chambers, Jonathan Woodard, Willard Howard, David Putnam, Joseph Adams, Samuel Adams, Jeduthan Warren, Samuel Perham, Josiah Fletcher, Henry Fletcher, Joel Spalding, David Danforth, David Marshall, Aaron Chamberlain, Azariah Spalding. Timothy .'\dams, Jonathan Robins, Ephraim Robins, Supply Reed, \\'illiam Spalding, Stephen Pierce, Benjamin Butterfield, Levi Fletcher, Ben- jamin Haywood, Oliver Richardson, John Hadlock, Joseph Butter- field, Joseph Ingalls, Aaron Small, William Fletcher, Benjamin Detion, Samuel Lunn, Solomon Pollard, John jMarsh, Jesse Butter- field, Elizer Farwell, William Parker, Jacob Baldwin. Joseph Tyler, John French; Oliver Adams, Samuel Adams. This company was out for forty-three days. It brought back some fifty prisoners, which it guarded all the way to Cambridge. With the Saratoga incident. Captain Ford's military career came to an end. For forty-five years subsequently he dwelt in peace and prosperity at the Falls, remembered by his physician. Dr. John A. Green, as "a tall, wiry, active man, bowed by the weight of years and his great privations and labors, of few words, direct, of primitive sim- plicity and sterling integrity." From the Dracut side went forth against Burgoyne. Captain Joseph Bradley Varnum's company with the following muster roll : IX THE REVOLUTION 89 Captain, J. B. Varnum ; lieutenant, Ephraim Cobiirn ; sergeants, Abijah Fox, Jonas Varnum, Jonathan Jones, Timothy Parker; cor- porals, John Hancock, David Trull ; clerk, Joshua Pillsbury ; fifer, Barzala Lue (Barzillai Lew); privates, David Jones, Samuel Barron, William Abbott, Simeon Coburn, David Coburn, Samuel Coburn, Reuben Coburn, Jonathan Crosby, Moses Davis, David Fox, Zacha- riah Goodhue, Bradley \'arnum, Josiah Hildreth, Daniel Jaqueth, John Means, Jonathan Parkhurst, Ebenezer Sawyer, David Sawyer, David McLaughlin, Isaac Parker, Samuel Piper, Jonathan Taylor, Thomas Taylor, Solomon W'oods, John Woods, Peter Hazleton. The veteran John \'arnum's entries during the weeks of this cam- paign are of interesting evidence of the local excitement. They run as follows : 27 Sept. 1777, Orders came for X> of ye able bodied officers and soldiers immediately to march to Tyconderoga. 29 Sept., Capt. Joseph Bradley Varnum was drawn with 40 men to march to ye Westward. I Oct., Capt. Varnum and his men tarried until afternoon wait- ing for horses. I Oct., The Companv marched early in ye morning. 12 Oct., Had news that our people had arrived safely to Benning- ton. 16 Oct., Old Mr. Davis came home from the Army with ye horse that went with the last recruits. Brought word that our friends was all well, in high spirits, that Burgoyne's Army was retreating, our Army harassing them giving battle. Got many advantages greatly embarassing Burgoyne's Retreat. Sunday, 26 Oct. 1777. Lt. Ephrm : Coburn, Jona : Jones & Dr. Abbot come home from ye Army. Confirmed the surprising account of ye Wonderful Victory over Burgoyne and his whole Army, being about 7000 all taken. Surrendered to Gen. Gates and laid down their arms to us, resigned their public stores, that our Militia was conduct- ing them to Boston, expecting they would be in this week. Mr. Davis preached an excellent sermon suitable to the occasion, from that part of the story of Moses where Pharaoh & his host was pursuing the Children of Israel, and had overthrew them in the Red Sea. A concise statement of the Dracut participation in the Burgoyne campaign occurs in the Joseph Bradley Varnum autobiography : "In 1777 he [Captain Varnum] marched with a volunteer company to the siege of Burgoyne, and on the 17th of October, 1777, he had the con- solation of seeing a whole British army, with Burgoyne at their head, march from the heights, music beating a retreat, upon the plains of Saratoga, and there lay down their arms and surrender themselves prisoners of war to the American army and militia." General Var- num appends some figures of the number of prisoners and the ciuan- tity of the booty. He adds that "Varnum and his command again volunteered their services and guarded the German troops from Sara- toga to Winter Hill, near Boston." 90 HISTORY OF LOWELL The pleasure with which the neighborhood regarded the success of their men at Saratoga is certainly reflected in an entry of Squire Varnum's journal: "i Nov., Jona : Parkhurst came home from ye Army, brings word that all is well. Zealous for a fife & fiddle for the grand apperance the day that Burgoyne's Famous Army is to be brought in. A Wonderful Show, a day that our hearts should be employed to speak and live to the peace of God." In the dreary time between Burgoyne's surrender and the Ameri- can victory at Yorktown, the difficulty of securing volunteers was persistent. Captain Josej)h Bradley Varnum. however, in 1778, marched in command of his militia company to Rhode Island to join with General Sullivan in his contemplated attack which was to be made in conjunction with the French fleet. "The fleet being dis- persed by a heavy gale of wind it became necessary for the General to retreat. They retreated l)y way of Pro\-idence and served out their term of enlistment at East Greenage and Warwick." Toward the end of the war, nevertheless, the prevalent lack of enthusiasm appears to have affected even the unusually loyal militiamen of Dracut, for Cap- lain Varnum, though in a commendatory way, comes into a record of bewailment that fills General Heath's communication of April 7, 1780, to the General Assembly of Massachusetts, as disclosed in the Heath papers, published by the Massachusetts Historical Society. The Bay State commander reported that "letters [from West Point] are so replete with representations of the uneasiness and discontent of the troops of your line that it would be criminal in me to conceal them." One correspondent, quoted by Fleath, wrote: "Where is the publick spirit of the year 1775, where are those flaming patriots who were ready to sacrifice their lives, their fortunes, their all for the publick, are they throwing their weight into the scale against those who have fought bled and even the widows of those who have been killed in the service of their country?" Another correspondent wrote to the gen- eral : "Captains Varnum and Bancroft have resigned within these three days, with a great number of other good officers. I have not heard of one soldier inlisting for a month past." Other similar pas- sages might be cited to show that the affair at Yorktown came none too soon to satisfy a war-worn and exhausted people. Another bit of evidence of the effort with which enlistments were secured is noted in a resolve of the Dracut meeting of February 9, 1779: To pay Kindall Parker Ten Pound money per mimey he paid to hire men into the service in the )'ear 1778 18/ for a pair of stockings. Kendall Parker, wIki thus appears in the record as a recruiter, advancing his own money in the patriotic cause, was a resident of the I\' THE REVOLUTION 91 extreme eastern part of the town, an ancestor of Dr. Moses Greeley Parker, of Lowell, some time president-general of the National Soci- ety of the Sons of the American Revolution. His military record, as piililished by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts: Private, Capt. Stephen Russell's Co. of Militia in Col. Green's Regt. which marched on the alarm of April 19, 1775; services, two days : also Corporal, Capt. Joshua Reed's Co. Col. Varnum's Regt. ; enlisted Dec. 13, 1775 (service not given); also Private, Capt. Joseph Bradley Varnum's Co., Col. Simeon Spaulding Regt. ; abstract of equipments for train band and alarm list endorsed '1777'; reported as belonging to alarm list ; also, returns, etc., of 2nd Dracut Co. ; list of persons who paid money to hire men to serve 8 months in the Conti- nental Army, agreeable to resolves passed in April, 1778; said Parker with others hired Ebenezer Sawyer, and is reported as having paid £ 10 toward his hire. These efforts on the part of public-spirited men and women, it should be said, gave Dracut a remarkable reputation for participation in the war. In 1904 there was dedicated at Dracut Centre, in front of tlie Yellow Meeting House, a tablet with the following inscription: In Memory of the Men of Dracut Who Served in the Revolutionary War, 1 775- 1 783. 423 out of a Population of 1173 Placed by Old Middlesex Chapter, Sons of the American Revolution. 1904 Suppression of loyalists or "tories" was one of the duties or privi- leges of home-staying folk in the country towns of Massachusetts during the Revolution. Lo}al as the Bay State was in the main to the revolutionists' cause, adherents of the King were so numerous and so well to do that the Legislature felt itself obliged on April 30, 1779, to pass its very drastic Confiscation and Banishment Act. Lancaster and other towns of the Nashua river valley were especial centres of Tory influence, as shown by Jonathan Smith, in his "Toryism in Worcester County," and many families of Dimstable, Westford and Chelmsford are indicated by entries in Squire John Varnum's journal as infected by the same spirit of disaffection. Early Anti-Slavery Spirit — Incidents of the daily life of the neigh- borhood show that during the Revolution what may be called distinc- tivelv American ideas regarding human rights and freedom were be- coming part of the mental equiiiment of average citizens. In view, indeed, of the part which Lowell was later to play in the great war for extinction of feudal slavery in the South, especial interest attaches to 92 HISTORY OF LOWELL the hostility toward slave-holding which was already developing in New England. The extinction of negro slavery, which in Massachu- setts had been forecast in such opinions on the subject as were held by the \'arnums of Dracut, was an immediate consequence of the Revolution. The popular notion is that the holding of slaves became illegal through the adoinion of the State Constitution, "which declared all men free and equal." As, however, the late Emory Washburn showed in one of his contributions to the Massachusetts Historical Society, this famous clause "was literally a declaration of what the people regarded as already their rights, rather than an exposition of any newly adopted abstract jirinciples. * * * It was not, as already stated, determined S(.i much by ruiy ])Ositive language to enactment in the Constitution as by that all pervading sense of the community, that the time had come when that shnery against which they had been so long struggling, was incomi)atible with their character as a free and independent State, and ought to be suppressed." A datum indicating the revised feeling toward sla\-ery is in an item of the John \'arnum journal of March 4, i77(): "One Stephen Hartwell here to ad\-ise relating to a Neagro named Jeffery Hartwell. Spent considerable time with him, at his request relating to said Negros freedom. He would IvdvQ given me a fee. I refused to take one in a Neagro cans." The Rescue of Silas Royal — Of all the stories of the Dracut inter- est in the welfare of colored folk, the most thrilling, assuredly, is that of the rescue of Silas Royal, faithful servant of the East Dracut Wirnums. from kidnappers, after a chase that brought forth the \'ar- niim clan from \\'oodbine cemetery down to the Alethuen line. Thi.-^ faithful negro was bought as a baby by Major Samuel \';irnum in Boston in exchange for a fine salmon. The little pickaninny was care- fullv reared in the home which the father of two Revolutionary officers had built in the easterly part of Dracut al^out three miles below the junction of the two rivers. Roval seems to have grown up into a husky young fellow. ]H>pu- lar in the whole countryside. An adventurous spirit led him in the first days of the war to leave home and enlist on a privateer. Out of disputes concerning his share of prize money grew a mass of troul:)les which the eloquent chronicler. Squire Varnum, descrilies in one of the most entertaining passages of his journal. Here is the story: June 19. 1778. This morning while at breakfast heard that Joshua WS-man [of Woburn] had sold Ryal Varnum, that ye news was brought from W'estford by Joseph Varnum, Jr., and that sd Ryal was carried oiT in a covered waggon HandicuiTed. On hearing of which Immediately called for my horse & galloped to Jos. Varnums to know the certainty. He confirmed it. Sent him to Capt. Jos. to come Imme- diately & Joyne in ye pursuit to Relive sd Ryal. He came Imme- diately. Sent Jonas'with my horse. Gave Jonas $20 to bare his ex- IX Till-: RK\"OLUTIOX 03 penses, with orders to pursue with all possible speed, overtake, Bring back, and not suffer such astounding vyolence to Escape with Im- punity. They pursued. Came to Woburn. found the news confirmed. That it was ye infamous John White, the Scurrilous Tinker of Haver- hill, that Bought him (at ye same time knowing sd Ryal was a free- man) sd White had Imprisoned him, Woburn people had liberated him. Sd White laid a false charge against him. Said he was an Inlisted Soldier in ye Continental service, that he had received $20 Continental money & had Deserted, that he stole from sundry persons & was a thief, & that if ye prison Could not hold him, ye guard should & Profainly Swore that he had bought him & would have him some- way, and on that complaint, altho he knew it to be false, he put him under Guard. There is ye Infamous W'hite, That hath worked by some means or other to be a Quartermaster for the Army at or near Boston, a fine post to get money when Truth nor Honour be not regarded. Silas Royal's friends fortunately had influence as well as the grafting quartermaster. The sequel was recorded a day later: June 26, Capt. Jos. & Joaas \'arnum went to Boston. Com- plained to Gen. Heath Against sd White, had sd Ryal liberated & a promise from ye General that he would take Notice of said \\'hite. They give him sd White's Just Character, he promised he would take notice of it. They went to White, Informed him what they had done. He was extremely angry. Curst & Swore very Profainly, they dealt him very sharph' for his Conduct to Ryal. He said he did not know Ryal was free. They told him that he could not know that his Crime alleged against Ryal for which he was put in Gaol was true, but that he knew ye Contrary. He said all such Damd Neagroes ought to be slaves. They told him that Ryal was as Good a man, & of as much honour as he, at which he was extremely angry & profain. Laid his hand on his Hanger by his side. They told him that they had seen Hangers & men before they had seen him or his, that they was ready to answer him any way he pleased, that they could not forget his Con- duct towards Ryal, that they on sd Ryal's Behalfe should bring an action of Damage for false Imprisonment, that such arbitrary Tyrants & menstealers should not go uninuiished. They came to Wyman's ye same Day, Gave him ye like trimming. The attempted kidnapping of Royal finally came to court, and before Justice John Varnum, the diarist. Captain Joseph Bradley and Jonas \'arnum gave sworn testimony to the effect that "some time in June, 1778, we heard from Persons of \'cracity that Sergeant Wyman of Woburn had sold Silas Ryal, and that the sd Silas Royal was seen in a wagon with irons on his hands between Cambridge and Waltham, the sd Royal crying for help, as was supposed ; But the wagon being drove fast, were not able to make any pursuit. Upon this intelligence we set out in order to rescue the sd Royal, if possible, from being sent forth as a slave, supposing this to be the Intent <>{ the Purchaser." 94 HISTORY OF LOWELL In the courts the cause of Silas Royal did not at first run just as the X'arnunis wanted; hut finally matters were adjusted and the delighted Ijlack man was restored to his f'ld friends. He lived on as a servant in the Varnum household until after the General's death in 1821, and when he passed away he was buried, at his own request in a corner of the Varnum cemetery beside a grave that was reputed to be that of an Indian. CHAPTER VI. Beginnings of Industrial Lowell. The transition of industry from a basis of handicrafts to one of numufacturing. of social life and customs, from a rural status to one of increasing urlianity and cosmopolitanism, began, as for the Lowell district of Northeastern Massachusetts, in the period that ex- tended from the end of the Revolutionary War to 1822. Events in these forty years did net. indeed, nio\e so rapidly as might have theoretically been ex])ected toward an industrialism which was already established in England and which was more or less generally foreseen as impending in the United States. One is struck in going over local records of the first decades of the new Republic with the persistence of habits of working and living which were fixed long before the separatiim from England. Politically, of course, man's ways of thinking underwent a change, but otherwise people were inclined to cling to ancient usages and devices for feeding and cloth- ing the family. In the third decade of the nineteenth century, new ideas, new people, came crowding to the villages and farms about the falls of the two rivers. Up to that time East Chelmsford and the communities over the river wer^r only a little more urban than they had been for nearly a century before the Peace of Utrecht. Building of canals, nevertheless, development of water powers and starting of manufacturing enterprises more ambitious than the very simple woolen mills, saw mills and grist mills of the eighteenth century were signs of an era that was approaching. The cutting of the Pawtucket canal helped to draw public attention to the power that ran to waste over Pawtucket Falls. The inauguration of the Locks and Canals Company furnished for the first time a definite incentive to improve the river for purposes of manufacturing and navigation. The building of the Middlesex canal brought the district into closer connection than before with Boston, and its suburbs, whence, ultimately, came much of the capital and other help required for creating the first American factory city. The stable, civilized and generally prosperous condition of the communities in question (except that they shared the universal dis- tress which immediately followed the Revolution, and which to a less extent was felt before and during the War of 1812) may reasonably be emphasized. \ tradition to the effect that the neighborhood of Pawtucket Falls, prior to the coming of capitalists from the coast, was one in- habited solely by uncouth rustics is persistent. A characteristic mis- yC) HISTORY OF LOWELL i-tatement of facts, which should be easily ascertainable, is one in John Bach JMcMaster's "History of the American People" (vol. i, p. 6i): "When, in 1820, the fourth census was taken the C(.juntry arijund Lowell was a wilderness where sportsmen shot game. The splendid falls whicli furnish power to innumerable looms were all unused, and the two Inmdred needy beings who composed the whole population of the town found their sole support in the sturgeon and alewives taken from the waters of the Concord and Merrimack." Actually, as has been seen, the Dracut communities, which are now wards of the city of Lowell, belonged to one of the most prosperous and vigorous towns of the Commonwealth, one with a life of its own that would compare favorably with any American community of to-day whose interests are mainly agricultural. The Neck, or East Chelmsford, by reason of its distance from Chelmsford Centre, was less of a communal entity than was the present Pawtucket\ ille, but its people were of the same enterprising and successful sort. Inferior persons and families there were, as everywhere, city or country ; but the record of wills probated and the domestic furnishings which are still preserved by descendants entirely refute such a notion of universal poverty as might be gained from Professor McMaster's characterization. The fisheries to which Mr. McMaster refers were of some importance, but any pripulation which should have depended u]ii.n them for sole support would have been needy, indeed. That which was about to iKqipen was, to some extent, foreseen in the district. One certainly of tlmse who had prescience o'f the forth- coming industrial development was Squire Varnum, whose opinions and deeds have been freely quoted in the preceding chapter, and with whom leave must now be taken. In his will, executed shortly after his death in 17S3, is found this clause: "Whereas I have in this Will, Given all mv Rights of Fishing, wharfing, staging, Building of Mills, Dams &c. at ye Petucket Falls, and near the same, to my said three sons in Ecjual proportions, and as the same may hereafter be of some Importance for Mills, I direct that if either of them or their Heirs or anv of them shall desire to build thereon, and the others Interested shall Neglect to Joyne therein, those that are Desirous may build thereon without Let or hindrance from their Decling Brethren." Whatever premonitions of future commercial and industrial activ- ity men like John Varnum may have had, nothing revolutionary took place at once in the life of the settlements about the falls. Much of the personal attitude and feeling of this time is reflected in reminiscences of the Hildreths, whose chief holdings, as has been seen, were on the Dracut side of the river below the mouth of Beaver brook, occupying a large part of CentraKille north of Bridge street. INDUSTRIAL BEGIXXIXGS 97 Lieutenant Israel Hildreth — Preeminent in many respects among the pre-Lowell Hildreths was Lieutenant Israel Hildreth ( i755-i<^39), whom General Reade has most graphically characterized. Assessor, appraiser, agent to Boston, banker, bondsman, meeting house builder, fish ward, fence viewer, keeper of the town paupers and l:)oarder of school dames, overseer of the poor and ordination committee man, road commissioner, referee in disputes concerning bounds and fences, sealer of weights and measures, school committeeman, selectman, land surveyor, town treasurer, town clerk and tithingman — these are some of the local offices which he is shown by the town records to have held. He had besides, a taste of military experience and his service aboard a privateer in the Revoliilion was not without episodes. He lived in a part of Dracut that was afterward annexed to Lowell and during his long life time he saw the little villages about the falls in process of being overlaid with a thriving city. Much of a conserva- tive he appears to have been, least as regards changes in the life of the neighborhood which the ad\ent of capitalists from Boston was eflfecting. He led the resistance of Dracut to encroachments upon ancient fishing privileges and he otherwise was an opponent of the policies of the Locks and Canals Company. General Reade's account of Israel Hildreth indicates that he was one of those exceptionally strong and complex characters who found conditions favorable in the first days of the Republic. He must have created an impression of awe among his intimates, for even the mem- bers of his family habitually addressed him as "sir," and when he entered a room all chattering or merriment ceased. His goodness of heart at the same time was universally recognized, and all beggars or other persons in need of help were sent to Lieutenant Hildreth. Often several beds in the back part of the Hildreth mansion were occupied by homeless wanderers whom no one else would have sheltered. His means were large for the time, and he was known as a liberal sub- scriber to many good causes. In person the Lieutenant was stately and dignified, scrupulously neat in his attire and. unlike most men of his period, never addicted to tobacco. He had black hair which he wore braided into a cue and tied behind with a l)lack ril)bon. He attended church at Dracut Centre. If on any account the sermon did not please him he was liable to leave abruptly, banging the door as he went out. In politics he spurned dictation, especially that of his down-river neighbor. General Joseph Bradley Varnum. who once tact- lessly said to him while both were serving in the Legislature : "Israel, of course you will \ote as I do." Lowell's First Titled Resident — Intimate glimpses of the quality of the social life of the neighborhood directly after the Revolution are similarlv afforded by the story, which Mrs. Gritifin has most graphically L-7 (jS HISTORY OF LOWELL tuld, of a distinguislied alien who came to spend the remaining years of his life in the older part of Draciit. Colonel Marie Louis Amand Ansart de Marasquelles, son of a French marquis and nephew of the celebrated Marquis Montalambert. or Colonel Ansart, as he was demo- cratically known after he became a resident of this country, was one of the conspicuous residents of the Merrimack valley for a number of years. He had come from France to help the revolutionists in 1776. Because of his special knowledge of artillery, he was made colonel of artillery and inspector-general of the foundries of Massachusetts, an office which he held throughout the Revolutionary \\'ar. Not caring to return to France he was naturalized in the courts of Massachusetts. He chose a home in Dracut through his friendship, as it is supposed, with General James AL Varnum. He bought the farm on Varnum ave- nue known as "The Ministree," which had been occupied by Rev. Thomas Parker and there he lived down to his death in 1804. As a resident of the community at Pawtucket Falls, Colonel Ansart took a live interest in local happenings, and his name appears frequently in the records. He kept servants, both white and black, including a French cook. His sulky, to which a fine span of horses was hitched, is said by Mrs. Griffin to have been the first vehicle of its kind in Dracut. There seems to be reason for believing that Colonel Ansart spent more than his income. After his death, at all events, Mrs. .■\nsart, in 1804, petitioned Congress for a pension, setting forth her late husband's services and the straitened circumstances in which he left his family. This petition was referred to a committee, but no action was taken until RLirch 17, 1806, when the widow was given leave to withdraw. After Mrs. .\nsart's death in January. 1840, a pension was granted the children. Colonel Ansart's long-lived sons, it may be added, are well re- membered by people of Lowell and Dracut who in 1918 are not be- yond middle age. Their residerice in the homestead on A'arnum ave- nue in the seventies and eighties gave to many a sense of nearness to the revolutionary struggle. Concerning the later survivor of these "Sons of the American Revolution," the "Evening Star" published an obituary on November 18, 1892, which contains interesting and valu- able data as follows : Abel Ansart, an old citizen of Lowell, died of pneumonia recently at the residence of his son, George Ansart, at Londonderry, N. H., with whom he had resided for a number of years past, at the advanced age of 94 years, i inonth and nine days. Mr. Ansart was born in Dracut on what is now called Varnum Avenue, and was a son of Louis -Ansart, an officer in the Revolutionary war, who came from France in 1776, and was employed by our government in casting can- non, and appointed inspector general of the foundries. Col. Ansart was an educated Frenchman. Some time after the death of Col. INDUSTRIAL BEGIXXIXGS 99 Ansart Abel, the third son. went to live with Daniel Webster, with whom he lived for many years. He became a great favorite with Mr. Webster, and the writer has frequently heard him relate incidents in connection with his experiences in the Webster family. After he had returned to Dracut to live the great statesman would sometimes send for him to go on hunting and fishing excursions with him. Two of the sons of Col. Ansart remained in Dracut, viz. Atis, who died April 18, 1888, at the age of 91 years, and Abel, the subject of this sketch. They became residents of Lowell by the annexation of the territory where they lived in 1874. Belated recognition of the importance of this first titled resident of Lowell came about in recent _\ ears. For a long time a simple head- stone in the Woodbine cemetery occasionally caught the eye of the curious. Mrs. Griffin's account of Colonel Ansart's career, in her book on old Lowell houses, brought to light many forgotten details. The Dracut Library, since February 22, 1906, has had a portrait of him, believed to be authentic. This work was given at a meeting of the historical committee of the Molly Varnum Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, of Lowell, Silas R. Coburn receiving the picture and making a response in behalf of the library trustees. Under the portrait is an inscription : "Marie Louis Ansart de Marasquelles, colo- nel of artillery, inspector general of Massachusetts foundries in the War of the American Revolution; naturalized in 1793 by the name of Louis Ansart; born in France in 1742, died in Dracut in 1804.'' The Crushing of Shays' Rebellion — The political and military histor\- of the Lowell district in the last years of the eighteenth cen- tury and the first decades of the nineteenth is hardly to be told, con- nectedly. Since Shays' rebellion of 17S6-87 in Western Massachusetts was directly responsible for a concerted movement toward a more stable National government and a National constitution, the participation of Dracut and Chelmsford men in it has some special interest. After the Revolution, as is well known, the economic conditions of most American communities were deplorable in the extreme. The poorer classes of society, in particular, were hard pressed. Money was scarce. Farmers and others were very generally reduced to the expedient of barter. Thousands signed pledges to resist any court that attempted to take their property and to resist the public sale of goods that had been taken to pay debts. Those circumstances led to the revolt of many representatives of the debter class under Daniel Shays, a former soldier of the Revolution. \\'ithout entering into discussion of the real story of Shays' rebel- lion, which others who follow the economic interpretation of his- tory have told convincingly, it should be chronicled that one of the leaders in suppressing the revolt was attended by a following of Var- lOO HISTORY OF LOWELL nums, Coburns, Parkers, I'ierces, Hildreths, Tylers and representa- tives of other families of the farms about the falls. The foremost military and political figure oi northern Middlesex county, Joseph Bradley Varnum, (.)f Dracut, in the winter of 1786-87, left the Senate chamber and marched with his company to aid General Benjamin Lin- coln in quelling the rebellion. While the cam])aign was short and bloodless the service was severe on account of the bitter weather. The Varnum autobiography contains a succinct account of the night march uf thirty-three miles to Betersham through the cnuiching snow without a mouthful of food, an exploit which virtually spoiled Shays' chances of success. In the midst of the excitement General Lincoln found himself in need of funds with which Ui jiay the troops. He sent Captain \'arnum t(j Boston. The efficient officer covered a journey (if three hundred and twenty miles in three davs and one-half, and thereby won a special letter radley Varnum was thus summoned to render effective aid. Being then State Senator, General William Hiidreth wrote out an oath of allegiance under date of March 4, 1787, which was signed by many of the neighbors. "The signers," writes General Reade, "were sworn before a justice of the peace and their affirmation of principle and patriotism deserves to l>e honored by all Americans." The wording of this oath, which is cjuite representa- tive of the literary style of the late eighteenth century in North America, is as follows : We, the subscribers, do truly and sincerely acknowledge, profess, testify and declare that the commonwealth of Massachusetts is and of right ought to be, a free, sovereign and independent state ; and I do swear that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the said common- wealth and that 1 will defend the same against traitorous conspiracies and all hostile attempts whatsoever, and that I da renounce and abjure all allegiance, subjection and obediance to the King, Queen or govern- ment of Great Britain (as the case may be), and every other foreign power whatsoever ; and that no foreign Prince, Prelate, State or Potentate hath, or ought to have, any jurisdiction, supremacy, promi- nence, authority, dispensing or other power which is or may be vested by their constituents in the Congress of the L^nited States. And I do further testify and declare that no man, or body of men, hath or can have any right to absoh'e or discharge me from the obli- gation of this oath, declaration or affirmation, and that I do make this acknowledgment, declaration, denial, renunciation and abjuration heartily and truly according to the common meaning and acceptation of the foregoing words without any equivocation, mental evasion or secret reservation whatsoever. So help me God. INDUSTRIAL Bl^GlXNIX'GS loi The first signers of this oath of allegiance were J. B. \'arnum, \\illiam Hildreth, Thomas Hovey, Israel Hildreth, Parker \'arnuni, Joseph \arnuni. Bradley Varnum. Joseph Varnum. James Varnum, Peter Parker, Stephen Russell. Josiah Hildreth, George Stevens, Thomas Colnirn, James Harvey, Richard Hall and Samuel Barron. Another local incident which illustrates the feelings started by the Shays' disturbances concerns the ever loyal Molly Varnum. "Dur- ing this winter's campaign," writes General \'arnum. in his autdbiog- raphy, "Mrs. Varnum was annoyed by a number of those friendly to the insurrection and insulted in a nio.st menaced manner, but that heroic zeal and undeviating patriotism which was her uniform char- acteristic during the Revolutionary War enabled her promptly to repel their insinuations and menaces in a manner which compelled them to retire with apparent shame and confusion of face." An order on the town of Dracut dated in January, 1787, gives an indication of the method of financing the campaign against Shays. It is in the following phraseology: To Mr. Joseph \'arnum, Treasurer uf the Town of Dracut or Suc- cessor in sd. office pay to us the subscribers Selectmen of Dracut four pounds sixteen shillings which said sum the Selectmen paid to the Soldiers of Dracut when they marchd. towards Worcester for the Defence of this Commonwealth also twelve shillings to deliver to Mr. Kindel Parker Junr. for expenses for man and horses carrying Provi- sions t(i the .\rmy. Thom.\s Hovey, I SKA EL HiLDKETH. Dracut Jan. ye 2^, 1787. Selectmen of Dracut. A Contested Election — The district of which Chelmsford, Dracut and Tewksbury were a part in 1795 elected to membership in the Fourth National Congress, General Varnum, who was an anti-Fed- eralist. .\n evidence of the [lolitical animosities of the time occurred when this election was promptly challenged by some of the successful candidates' adversaries on the ground that, acting as selectman of Dracut, he had allowed certain votes to be received and counted, although those who cast them were ineligible to vote. A committee of Congress was appointed to look into the legality of Mr. \'arnum's election. Their report was to the effect that the "people of Dracutt were so satisfied as to gi\e no informaticMi on the suljject : and that the universal respect for Mr. Varnum where he lived contradicted the old proverb that 'a projihet is not without honor save in his own coun- try'." The report was a comj^lete vindication, since "no one of the plaintiffs or their agents had appeared to prosecute the complaint ; that the sitting member had evidence that the election in the town of Dracut (the unfairness of which had been complained of) was con- ducted with justice and propriety, and though there had been some 102 HISTORY OF L0\VP:LL irregularities committed in other ])laces, they mostly owing to the misconduct of the petitioners, and that the conduct of the sitting mem- ber has been fair and h(.)norable thrnughout the wliole transaction." The Congressional district, of which Lowell was soon to be the chief citv centre of po]iulation, tO(jk p'ride in the rapid rise of this son of Dracut to a commanding place in the Nation and he never lacked local support in the elections which returned him to several subse- quent Congresses. The fervor and rancor of American pulitics in the first four or five administrations has impressed more than one student of our history , and the corner of Massachusetts under survey was typically American in this as in other regards. Politically as well as in social aspects there appears to have been considerable difference between Chelmsford and Dracut in the first years of the Reptiblic. ']"he community south of the Merrimack was inclined toward Federalism ; in the precincts beyond Pawtucket Falls the personal influence of the Varnums was perhaps not the only factor in keeping the electorate strongly dennicratic. A characteristic election was that of 1809, when the anti-Federal- ists in opposition to Christopher Gore nominated for the Governorship, Levi Lincoln- for Lieutenant-Governor, Joseph Bradley Varnum. The Federalists, as was expected, carried the State. The votes of the two towns in cjuestion was : Gore. Lincoln. Chelmsford 95 loy Dracut 23 171 In the midst of the high feeling created by the opposition of Mas- sachtisetts Federalists to the second war with Great Piritain the Re- publicans on a platform favoring vigorous prosecution of the war nominated General Varnum for Governor and William King for Lieu- tenant-Governor. The intrenched candidate for reelection was Caleb Strong. The campaign was an active one in which the State rang with such doggerel as "A Republican Song" with a \'arnum and King chorus of which the first and last stanzas are possibly enough to quote : Election approaches ! ye Freemen attend And take the advice of a plain-hearted friend. If you're faithful in duty I'll venture to sing Vou are sure of the triumph of Varnum and King. ^ :|^ -t: * * =7: Then lie active and linn, ye Republican souls, .And let nothing keep you away from the polls. For Honor and Truth and Liberty sing Huzza for America, \ arnum and King. Despite the personal respect in which the candidate from Dracut was held, he failed to be elected, and Massachusetts was left in the INDUSTRIAL BEGIXXIXGS 103 position of the leadintj defeatist Commonwealth. The vote of April 5, 1813, in the towns of the Lowell district was as follows: \'arniim. Strong. Dracut 148 61 Chelmsford q3 151 Teuksbiiry 100 57 War of 1812 — Defective as the records of the War of 1812 are, it is evident that the militia of Chelmsford, Dracut and Tewksbury stood ready for service just as the minute-men of 1775 had been prepared. When general orders were issued to the State Guard on July 3. 1812, two of the three commanding officers of the Southern Division were Dracut men. the orders being received by Major-General Joseph B. Varnum and Brigadier-Generals Ebenezer Lothrop and William Hildreth. The hostility of Boston and the other coast towns to the war was such that the early preparations for possible invasion appear to have been much of a farce. Governor Strong mounted a few cannon nn Boston Common in a position of so evident uselessness that they were made the subject of sarcastic jest by his political o])ponents. It was not imtil after the capture of Washington in the summer oi 1S14 that the Commonwealth became aroused to the need of equipment against possible and probable assault. On September 6, of that year came orders from Adjutant-General J. Brooks for "the whole of the militia to hold themselves in readiness to march at a moment's notice." Pursuant to the spirit of these orders a con\ention of citizens of Mid- dlesex count}' met at Concord with Hon. .\mos Bond as chairman. Dracut was represented in the committee on resolutions by Brigadier- General Simon Coburn. General \'arnum's son-in-law, whose asso- ciates were the Hon. William Lustis, Hon. Samuel Dana. Mr. Bond, Dr. Thomas Whitcomb, Colonel Enoch Wiswall and Colonel John Chandler. The resoltitions called for immediate prei^aration of the forces asked for bv the Governor, for their proper ecjuipnient by the selectmen of their resjjective towns and other measures of preparation. In the fortification of Fort Strong that followed some of the Middle- sex companies were used, but the towns in the Lowell territory seem not to have been represented. The district on the whole can hardly be said to have participated extensively in the second war with England, but that circumstance was due jirimarily to the attitude of leading families at Boston and other commercial centres of New Eng- land. General \'arnum, who was a vigorous supporter of Madison's administration and of an aggressive military policy, was President of the United States Senate in iXi.Vi4. Forty Years of Industrial Expansion — .\ gradual di\ersitication of the vocational activities of the ])eople about Pawtucket Falls may 104 IIISTORV OK LOWKLL be traced during tlie jjei-iiid nf aljuut turty years in which the contests between Federalists and Repubhcans stood for a genuine uppusition of interests between shore towns of New England and tlu- unde- veloped hinterland. "l>v common c(jnsent," writes Weeden in his "Economic and Social llistiir\- of Xew l-'.ngland." "the year 1783 has been made an e])(.)cli in industrial deitelo]imcnt." In that year the political independ- ence of the United States was definitely guaranteed ; there were not wanting tho>e of the dominant social classes who already forsaw the economic in(le])en(Ience of the cgrowth of interest in transportation and manufac- turing which was one of the phenomena of the post-Revolutionary era, and which was soon felt in the communities at East Chelmsford and West Dracut. resulted, in brief, from causes that are quite apparent. Prior to the war the strip of seaboard from Maine to Florida had been regarded b}- the ruling classes of England as one of their prime oppor- tunities fur profitable inx'estment. Restrictions of every conceivable kind had been ])laced on colonial enterprise. Parliament in 1750 pro- hibited the colonials from erecting mills or apparatus designed to slit or roll iron, to do plating or to make steel. No hatter might employ more than two apprentices — an obvious plan of preventing the de- velopment of hat factories. Hrts or woolens made in one colony might not be sold in another colony. Despite the considerable smug- gling of locally made articles there was, therefore, relatively small incentive to engage on manufacturing on any large scale. This oppression from overseas naturally often overreached itself. "The acts restricting commerce and manufacture," says Oneal, "were aimed, as we have seen by the British ruling class against the colonial rtiling class. Tliis was sufficient to arouse the resentment of the lat- ter and drive most of them to revolt. But our colonial manufacturers were also aware of the great advantages which their British brethren possessed in the new machinery that Arkwright and others were in- venting across the sea. Machines for carding and spinning were fast displacing the old hand processes in tnaking cloth. * * * To guard this advantage the British parliament passed acts prohibiting the ex- portation of machines, plans or models of machines or any tools used in cotton or linen manufacture, under penalty of 200 ptiunds. Even the possession of them for export rendered the offender liable to arrest.'' Nearly forty years ela])sed before the full apparatus of the factory system, as evolved in Great Britain, was available for setting tip at Lowell ; I:)ut in the meantime a work nf i)re])aration toward this out- come was visibly going forward. The Era of Highway Making and Canal Building — Imi)rovemcnt of transportation facilities was one of the subjects that first occupied the attention of enterprising men at the end of the eighteenth century. In a countryside like that of Eastern Massachusetts, with its large population more evenly spread over the farms, less congested into towns than it now is, the problem of distributing commodities not unnaturally seemed to be of paramount concern. Until, indeed, the io6 HISTORY OF LOWELL motor car once more gave the open highway a renewed imjjortance, New England roads, and incidentally roadside taverns, were never so busy as in the da"\'s just prior to the introduction of steam na\'igation and the steam railway. Across the corner of Lowell th;it lies lietwcen North Billerica and Middlesex \'illage passed in thi first years of the nineteenth century an almost continuous procession of huge wains called "baggage wagons." These were part of a regular transijortation system cover- ing Central New Hampshire, and the valley of the Upper Connecticut. Each wagon was covered with a canvas top and the goods were securely protected by tarpaulins. In winter the wains were replaced In' tw(_) horse sleighs. These vehicles brought butter, cheese, apple sauce, dried apj)les, dressed hogs, maple sugar and other farm products to Boston and returned with salt fish, groceries, dry goods and much Medford rum. The old tavern, still standing in 1918 in Middlesex Village, was long a favorite hostelry of the drivers in this service. It was only one of almost innumerable places 01 refreshments between Boston and the outlying settlements of Northern New England. The prices which teamsters jiaid for entertainment at such houses as this one seem rea- sonable as judged by modern standards. In 1814, according to J. B. French's recollections, lodging at taverns in Chelmsford cost six or eight cents, the former rate prevailing if two shared a l)ed. Meals were twehe and a half cents each. "It was not an tmcommon occur- rence," remarks Mr. French, "when the teamsters were seated around a good fire in the evening, fur the landlord to bring in and treat to what cider the C(impan\- might want; and sometimes when competi- tion ran jiretty high for this kind of travel, a glass of 'sling' or 'bitters' was thrown in on settlement in the morning." Even after the Middlesex canal was built, much (if the traffic be- tween East Chelmsford and Boston continued to go oxer the high- ways. "Teaming from what is now Lowell and the adjoining towns," wrote Mr. French, in 1S74, "was done by ox teams almost entirely, biith summer and winter, in going to market, which was either Boston or Salem. Teams usually started frtim home the forepart of the day, carrying their uwn proxision fur man and lieast, traveling all day and such ]iart of the night as to enable them to reach market early the next morning, and disposing of their load that forennon. would start for h(jme in the afternoon, reaching hunie the third dav or night in the afternoon or evening, as a general rule without much rest or sleep except such as they were able t'l get while their teams were feeding." llnw uneci moniical this mude of trans])ortation was can readily be underst(.i(id. It kept a large body of otherwise productive workers on the TiYdd. it prex'cnted use of oxen and horses in farm work. It was INDUSTRIAL BEGIXXIXGS 107 liable to interruption in "mud time." The heavy teaming entailed great expenses upon the towns for maintenance and repair of roads. That favorable conditions for this large volume of teaming were kept up is proof of essential Yankee enterprise and conscientiousness. The office of road surveyor was entrusted to an energetic and careful man. Typical of the scrupulousness with which the highways were maintained are entries in the Dracut records regarding the repairing of what is now the main rciad between the cities of Lowell and Law- rence, and which then connected the communities at the falls with Methuen and Haverhill. In 1800 Jonathan Parker, serving as "Sur- veyor of Highways and Townways in the Town of Dracutt," was in- structed "To mend and repair" the road beginning at the school house near the Prescott Varnum place as far as the Methuen line, and he was commissioned "to alow one dollar per day for a man working at said way and fifty-six cents for a yoke of oxen at said way until the first day of August and after that fifty cents for a man per day and thirtv-three cents per day for a yoke of oxen and twenty-five cents per day for a cart when used." This order was signed by Thomas Hovey, Timothy Barker, Jr., and Solomon Osgood, Jr., assessors of Dracut. Similar entries might doubtless be drawn from the Chelmsford and Tewksbury records. The Original Pawtucket Bridge — Building and maintenance of bridges likewise assumed much consequence in the decades when trade expansion was primarily effected by extensions of good roads. The story of the first bridge over the Merrimack at Lowell, at the location now occupied by the sightly Pawtucket Bridge of reinforced concrete, is closely connected with the development of a trade route over Mammoth road to Derry, Londonderry, Chester and other in- terior towns of Southern New Hampshire. The economic and social effects of this undertaking supjilanting the tedious and unreliable Clark's Ferry at Middlesex, and Bradley's Ferry at Centralville, were such that the details may properly be set forth with some amplitude, and the narrative carried down into years succeeding the incorpora- tion of the town of Lowell. In this building of the predecessor of Pawtucket bridge, Lowell claims a certain priority among the towns of the Merrimack valley. It was the first to span the river in Massachusetts. Twenty-one days be- fore the Essex bridge at Newburyport was opened for traffic, which occurred on November 26, 1792, passage, free of tolls for twenty-four hours, was admitted to the Middlesex Merrimack river bridge, regu- larly incorporated under the laws of Massachusetts. This was thus a pioneer installation of its kind. Already in preparation for the event, the Mammoth road — its grandiloquent name delightfullv expressive io8 HISTORY OF LOWF.LL of the spirit of its age — had been hiid cmt throtit;!] Draciit intn the New Hampshire towns to the north. The Middlesex bridge i)roprietorship, in the organization of which Parker Varnum, son of Squire John Varnum, was the leading figure, was formed in February, 1792, under the style of the "Middlesex River Bridge ,Cori)oration." The plan was duly approved by Governor John Hancock. At a meeting of stockholders held at the house of Joel Spalding in luast Chelmsford, now the home of the Molly \'arnum Chapter of the Daughters of the .\merican Revolution, Colonel Loammi Baldwin, of Wdburn, was elected president, Parker \'arnum clerk and Colonel James X'arnum treasurer. The bridge jjlanned at this meeting was entirely of wood. Work was begun on the structure in June, 1792. To hurry operations forward the president was instructed l.iy the directcirs to buy at Boston two barrels of New England rum and every laborer was allowed half a pint a day "when called for by the master worker." This purchase may have looked like favoritism toward the workers, for a little later the [)resident was instructed to obtain a barrel of West Indi.a rum for use of the proprietors. Jocular intent, it may be, was inherent in a miiuite to the effect that directors absent from regular meetings must pa_\- "a fine sufficient to ]3ay for two mugs of Hip or toddy." The efforts of the carpenters, thus encouraged by generous pota- tions, seem to have been redoubled, for the work was finished long before cold weather came to make it arduous and disagreeable. On the evening before the opening day a special supjx'r was pro\-ided for sixty of the proprietors and laborers. The menu has not lieen pre- served. It is a safe surmise that the viands were not unaccom]3anied by flip and toddy. Tolls were collected on the new bridge by Itbenezer Bridge, of honored Chelmsford name. In the first three months the receipts were £18, 14s. 8^'jd. An inuuediate effect was greatly to increase the importance of the community at West Dracut, and, as will be shown in the subsetjuent account of the Pawtucketville church, to bring the residents of the Pawtucket street and Wannalancet Hill district of Lowell into close parochial relations with the church over the river. The record book, still in existence, of the proprietors of Middle- sex Merrimack bridge is one of the invaluable source books for the years between 1792 and the incorporation of the new town of Lowell. Among several interesting circumstances which it reveals is some evidence of a movement in 1813 toward setting off' a separate town to include the eastern part of Chelmsford and the western part of Dracut. This incorporation, which would have been more logical than the one actuall)' occurring a few years later, would have corresponded sub- INDUSTRIAL BKGIXXIXGS 109 stantially with the limits of the present city, exclusive of Belvidere and Centralville. It would, however, presumably have taken in a larger section of Dracut than that which was later annexed under the name of Pawtucketville. The Washingtonian temperance movement is shown by the bridge proprietors' JDook to have been still far in the future in the first decade of the nineteenth century, for, in keeping with the conditions of the original construction, the management continued to be liberal in their supply of strong liquor for their workmen. The following record is characteristic: "iiSoj. June 22. Being about to rebuild with stone abutments, voted to have the treasurer procure rum by the barrel and sugar by the quantity, and deal it out to the workmen." That this favoring attitude toward products of the still was not coupled with any hostility toward religion, of which the proprietors may be assumed to have been staunch "professors," is indicated by a vote passed a little later offering "free passage to all persons to anv public meeting at the West Meeting-house in Dracut." It was, indeed, a deacon of this church, of whom the story is told that being in Boston to lobby for some privilege concerning the bridge, he was met by two of his fellow proprietors in a bar room. "Well, deacon, what shall we have to drink?" "I don't know as it will do for me to take anything," was the cautious reply, "unless perhaps it be a leetle gin for my com- plaint." The "complaint," of course, was generally believed to be imaginary. The bridge at the falls continued throughout the pre-Lowell period to ofTer the only continuous highway to the farming districts north of the river. The desirability of having a second bridge a couple of miles further down river, to relieve inhabitants of eastern Dracut from the tiresome detour around the Great Bunt, seems to have been felt long before Central bridge was successfully projected. The proprietors at Pawtucketville did not welcome competition, as may be observed from this entry : "1823. Jan. 16. At a special meet- ing voted to choose an agent to oppose in the Legislature the petition of Edward St. Loe Livermore for a bridge over Merrimack River at Hunt's Falls, so-called." Year by year until long after Lowell was a thriving city, passen- gers paid toll at Pawtucket bridge, and the proprietors counted on receiving substantial dividends. The business methods under which they operated would excite the ridicule of a modern accountant. "The actual toll money," writes James S. Russell in his paper, "How Paw- tucket Bridge Was Built," read before the Old Residents' Associa- tion, August 4, 1887, "was emptied upon the table, counted and after deducting the quarter's expense, the remainder was divided by sixty, no HISTORY OF LOWELL the number of shares. Each one present bagged his pile, and others at their leisure obtained their portions by calHng upon the treasurer." As an entcrjjrise the IniiUling and operation of the bridge was a good investment. No special provision was made for depreciation and obsolescence. When repairs or rebuilding became necessary the shareholders were liable to assessment, but in only one year, in i8tS, was it required that an assessment be paid in cash. Ordinarily a cer- tain percentage of the annual dividend was withheld and called an assessment. The original shares cost $125. They sold as high as $300. The dividends, amounting in some years to as high as eighteen dollars a share, averaged to net about twenty-four per cent, on the first investment. The first cost of the bridge was $8,000. When, finally, after enjoying very substantial returns for more than half a century the proprietors were required to sell out in the interest of progress they received Si.2,000 lor the physical property. The early bridging of the Concord at North Billerica has been descrilied. This relatively narrow stream ofTered no such obstacles to the bridge iniilder as did the Merrimack. It should be noted that the growth of a settlement on the east side of the Concord in what was later called Belvidere was encouraged by the building of a bridge in 1774 just north of the site of the present structure. This bridge, as James Bavles has shown in one of the Old Residents' contributions read by him in i8qi, must have been a flimsy structure, for it was liio\\n down before it was fairly completed and another was started a few rods further up stream on the site of the jiresent bridge. Newburyport Enterprise at Pawtucket Falls — Lowell, as a city of ]iicturesque canals and humming factories, is generally held to have been a creation of Boston ca[)ital. It has sometimes been overlooked by historians that the first elifort to canalize the river came not from the Hub, but from the wealthy and aggressive town at the mouth of the stream, from Newburyport. Shortly after the declaration of peace in 1783 the merchants of Newbury, as disclosed in a paper prepared in 1876 b)' the artist, T. B. Lawson, of Lowell, began to consider ways and means of increasing traffic with the interior. In winter they had good trade with the towns of Southern and Central New Hampshire, and even with Ver- mont, by means of sleds laden with "pork and produce." Much of this traffic ceased with the advent of spring. Develo])ment of water- ways was already much under consideration abroad. The same im- pulse led Newburyport capitalists to send Nicholas Pike and Captain Stephen Holland up river to make a survey of the possibilities of a canal which should eliminate the navigation difficidties at Pawtucket Falls. Out of this expedition grew the first considerable deflection of the waters of the Merrimack for a commercial purpose. INDUSTRIAL BKGIXXIXGS ni Arrived at the seat of Captain John Ford's milling operations, the investigators from Newburyport discovered a natural depression ex- tending from the south side of the Merrimack just above the falls to the Concord river at no great distance from its confluence with the larger stream. Out of their report grew a definite project for a canal A charter for this enterprise was granted June 25, 1792. The directors were: President, Hon. Jonathan Jackson; vice-president. Hon. Dud- ley Tyng; treasurer, Joseph Cutler; Joseph Tyler, Nicholas Johnson, John O'Brien, Joshua Carter and William Smith. Plans were informally considered at a dinner in Davenport's tavern on August 13, 1792, and then came a meeting at the house of Joseph \'arnum in Dracut, at wliich the actual route was mapped out. It was resolved "that a canal Ije cut at Pawtucket Falls on the side of Chelmsford, beginning near the 'Great Landing Place," thence run- ning to 'Lily Pond,' from there bj- 'Spear's Brook' to Concord River." This was on August 23. On the 13th of September following, Mr. Tj-ng was authorized to buy from Jonas Parkhurst the land through which the canal would run and to pay therefor £100 lawful currency. In March, 1793, the promoters signed a contract with Joseph Tyler to dig the canal for £4,334 lawful, of which £ 1,000 was to be paid on or before April 25, 1793. Pawtucket Falls were not the only rapids to be considered, for on June 14 following it was resolved to ascertain how- much money was needed to clear Hunt's Falls just below the junction of the two rivers and Wickassee Falls at Tyng's Island. Operations at the former spot may have been included in a resolve of Julv 2~, 1795. to the purport "that Colonel James \'arnuni l)e authorized to employ men, and to superintend operations below Pawtucket Falls, and to expend all necessarj- sums not exceeding one thousand two hundred dollars." Canal building was not without its difiiculties, and, on January 25, 1796, Joseph Tyler having failed to complete the work as expected, it was voted that "Thomas Marsh Clark of Newburyport, be, and hereljy is, appointed superintendent of the operations to be performed at Paw- tucket Falls the ensuing season, and that he be paid three dollars and thirty-three and one-third cents per diem, for every day that he shall be employed in the service of the proprietors, together with his board and necessary travelling expenses. He is also authorized to employ men, purchase tools, etc." The new superintendent appears to have been a veritable Colonel Goethals of his day, and on October i, 1796, the canal, with its four locks was so nearly completed that the directors announced October iS as the date of opening. A formal event was planned which, as the Courier-Citizen history states, proved "somewhat unfortunate," for "as the first barge carrying many notables was passing through the 112 HISTORY OF LOWELL first lock, witnessed by hundreds of spectators, the sides of the lock biu'st, and txiat notaldes, visiters and all, took a hath together. It was remarkable that none was killed or seriously injured." As the first of its kind in tlie New World the completion of this canal was widely heralded thrcjughout the United States. A local consequence of much moment was to inaugurate and perpetuate the Proprietors of the Locks and Canals on Merrimack river, under whose auspices has occurred a great deal of the manufacturing development of Lowell and other cities of the valley. This canal, the first of Lowell's extensive system of waterways, was not conceived of as a water power project. "The canal thus com- pleted," wrote Mr. Lawson, "was successful in its main object of facili- tating the transportation of ship timber, lumber and produce to New- buryport and the mouth of the river, but paid small dividends, at long intervals^ probably averaging less than four per cent, upon the total outlay." The organization which was formed under the style of "The Pro- prietors of the Locks and Canals on Merrimack River," after a petition for incorporation signed by Dudley A. Tyng, William Coombs, Joseph Tyler, Nicholas Johnson and Joshua Carter, was endowed with exten- sive privileges, having the power to take land by eminent domain, to levy tolls and fix rates in accordance with the following stipulations : For passing the locks and canals at Wickasick and Patucket Falls, to be received at Patucket, for every thousand feet of pine boards, two shillings ; for every thousand feet of two and a half inch pine plank, six shillings, and other pine plank in proportion thereto ; for every cord of pine wood, eight pence ; for every cord of other wood, one shil- ling; for every thousand feet of barrel staves, two shillings; for every thousand of hogshead staves, three shillings and six pence ; for every thousand of pipe staves, five shillings ; for every ton of oak timber, one shilling and six pence ; for every ton of pine timber, ten pence ; for everv boat or other vessel, at the rate of one shilling for every ton burthen it is capable of conveying, whether loaded or not ; for every mast, at the rate of one shilling for every inch of the diamter thereof at one third of the length from the largest end ; and for all articles not enumerated in proportion to the rates aforesaid for passing the locks, canals and passageways at Hunt's, Varnum's, Parker's and Peter's Falls, one half of the foregoing rates ; for passing the locks and canal of Peter's Falls only, one quarter of the foregoing rates. And on all articles having passed the locks, canals and passageways of Patucket Falls, one half on!}- of the toll herein established, to he paid at Peter's Falls, shall be received ; and for passing the locks, canals and passage- ways of Bodwell's I-'alls and Mitcliell's Falls one third of the rates hereinbefore established, to be paid at Patucket Falls, subject to a deduction of one third thereof on all articles having paid toll at Pa- tucket Falls. INDUSTRIAL BEGIXNINGS 113 These rates of toll were in 1804 further regulated by the Legis- lature. The Locks and Canals Company, it may be added, in this period of its history, was hardly to be regarded as a markedly success- ful concern, the more so as, in its primary function of carrying lumber, it soon had a formidable competitor in the Middlesex canal, the story of which must be narrated with some fullness of detail. In 1822 the proprietary rights of the Locks and Canals Company suddenly assumed a new significance. The Middlesex Canal — Canal building across country, to aft'ord cheaper transportation, had, as everybody knows, a remarkable vogue in the United States between the beginnings of industrialism and the introduction of George Stephenson's "Iron horse," the Erie canal be- tween New York and the Great Lakes ranking as the superlative achievement. The priority in this type of American transportation of the Mid- dlesex canal, whose northern terminus was on the ancient John Saga- more reservation at Middlesex Village, has given to the history of this construction unique interest to residents of Lowell and the other towns on its route. Its opening occurred in the first years of the nineteenth century. It was successfully operated until long after Lowell had been incorporated as a city. Men now living have per- sonal reminiscences of the picturesque traffic which was carried on over the stretches of quiet water between Middlesex \'illage and Charlestown. Those recollections have been emliodied in valuable papers such as, in especial, those of Judge Samuel P. Hadley, whose father was manager of the locks at Middlesex Village and who as a young boy was personally acquainted with boats and boatmen on the canal. The [Middlesex Canal was finally abandoned when because of much stress of competition from the railroad, it had ceased to pay. The condition of its bed over most of the distance from Concord river down to Mystic Lake in \\ inchester in such as, frequently of late years, to have prompted the suggestion that at no great expense the canal might be rebuilt to the considerable benefit of several manufacturing communities reached by it. This was not the first enterprise of the kind to be chartered in the United States, for in 1792 the Massachusetts Legislature granted per- mission to General Henry Knox and others to construct a canal con- necting the Connecticut river with Boston harbor. This latter project presumably appeared to be too great for the resources of the pro- moters, for it never passed the initial stages. A year later, however, the Great and General Court entertained a proposal from se\eral prominent gentlemen of the Bny State to project a canal from the most southeasterly angle of the Merrimack to tide water in Charles- town. The original act incorporating the projjrietors of the Middlesex L-8 114 HISTORY Ol- LOWIiLL canal was signed l)y tjovernor Julm Ilancuck, June 22. 171J3. The incorporators were James Sulli\an. ( )liver Preacutt, James W'inthrop, Loammi Baldwin, lienjamin Hall, Jonathan J'orter, Andrew Hall, Ebenezer Hall, Samuel Tufts, Jr., Aaron Brown, Willis Hall, Samuel Swan, Jr., and Ebenezer Hall, Jr. By their charter they were author- ized to "cut" a canal from the Merrimack ri\cr tn Medford | Mystic] river. C,)ut (if this ]iermissiiin grew the first American iractinn canal of a t}'pe that was already familiar in luigland and mi the cimtinent of Europe. The moving si)irit in this undertaking was L'nlonel Luammi Bald- win, fiiurth in descent from Henry Baldwin, one nf the ciriginal set- tlers of Woburn and son of James and Ruth ( Richardson ) P.aldwin. An early exponent of the engineering sciences. Colonel Baldwin estab- lished in an active lifetime many claims to an honorable place in American annals. He was born in Wolnirn, January 21, 1745. and died Octoljcr 20, 1807. As a student at Harvard he excelled in mathe- matics t(i such an extent that his chcjice of surveying as a profession was natural. In the Revolution he entered ser\ice as a major, taking part in the Ijattle of Lexingtim Green on April 19, 1775. He fought at Long Island and was with Washington when the Hessians were cap- tured at Trenton. In 1777, due to failing health, he was retired with the rank y Mr. W'ardwell. The passengers will bring their provisions on board, as there can be no delay to go on shore for refreshment. The passage money is four cents a mile, and passengers will be taken on and landed where they shall choose. The toll for Canalage, is, at the rate of 1/16 of a dollar for a ton each mile. And the expense of transportation in the boat is three cents and an half for each mile. The property will be secure from hazard or accident, and delivered to the owner or his consignee where he directs. If nobody appears to take it, the Agent of the Canal Corporation will hold it, subjected to payment of storage, until the owner or his consignee appears. The toll and transportation between Charlestown and the head of the Canal is twenty-eight miles. Goods brought to, or carried from, Boston, will pay for thirty miles. Goods will be taken in and landed at Aledford, Woburn, Wilmington and Chelmsford. But this must be done so as not to prevent the Boat from eflfecting a punctual arrival at the ends of the Canal. There are other boats ready on the Canal to proceed when there shall be business for them. The regula- tion suggested will apply to the other boats, subject to such altera- tions as experience shall dictate for all the boats employed. Middlesex Village, with its well kept houses, its historic tavern and its old New England meeting house (now no longer /';; situ) was peculiarly a creation of the Middlesex canal. The land between Black brook and Xorth Chelmsford was originally, as has been observed, the John Sagamore plantation, a tract especially favorable to raising corn. By the Indians this land was sold to Lieutenant Henchman, who dis- posed of a part of it to a Mr. Cragie and another part to members of the Howard family. Through Mr. Cragie or his grantees some of the lands came into possession of C:'ptain Tyler, who moved thither from Wamesit Xeck. Befcjre the canal came, the tiiree or four houses and a tavern com- posing the hamlet could hardl}- be called a village. The residences of which there is record were the Willard Howard house, Jerathmel Bowers house, the Clark house at the ferry and a cottage house and barn which Judge Hadley describes as being "between the old tavern and the ferry, and known in my childhood as the Sawin house, that being the name of the family who ()ccui)ied it." According to tradi- tion the Deacon Adams house on Baldwin street was formerly a shop at the corner of [Middlesex and Baldwin streets, but was later moved back and made over into a dwelling. The ta\'ern, as it still stands at this writing, is obviously an outcome of several additions. It was a natural location for a public house prior to the building of the Paw- tucket Bridge, for Clark's Ferry was a funnel through which traffic poured to and from Dracut, Pelham, Windham and Derry. The landlord of the Middlesex tavern in the first years of the cen- tur\- was Jacob Howard, who ceased to purvey food and drink about 1816. and who was succeeded by Jesse Smith, to be followed in 1820 by Simeon Spalding. I20 HISTORY OF LOWELL Near by on Wood street, in what is believed to be the oldest house in Lowell south of the river, lived Colonel Joseph Bowers, re- called as a typical New England farmer of the better sort, "honest, energetic, upright and downright." He was locally famous for his tine cattle. "He always,'' writes Judge Hadley, "kept a number of yoke of strong oxen which, in the canal season, he used in towing rafts of masts, spars and lumber logs from the head (jf the canal at Middlesex and to tidewater at Charlestown." The house in which Judge Hadley has lived during his long and honorable career was built in 1822 by Harvey Burnett. Here for a time Francis Brinley had his law office, in the east room. The first-hand cpiality of Judge Hadley 's reminiscences of canal-boat days is evidenced by his statement : "I suppose I am one of the very few surviving employees of the Canal Corporation. I not only worked for it, but 1 fished in it, 1 swam in it, I came very near being drowned in it, I sailed my little boats upon it, I skated upon it, and I knew every part of it. From early childhood until the close of the canal, I knew every captain and boat man who worked upon it.'' Manufactures Before the Factory System — The manufacturing in- terests uf the Lowell district continued tu be relatively a minor con- sideration as compared with agriculture down to the date at which the modern factory system was introduced, even though the existence of much industry of a primitive sort in this neighborhood cannot be for- gotten. In general, nevertheless, the importance of manufacturing was as yet not so great but that it might be depreciated as detrimental to the fisheries. The Hildreths, of Centralville, were notably hostile to developments which threatened to interfere with the ancient privi- leges of fishing at the Great Bunt. Colonel William Hildreth was chosen fish ward on April 6, 1801, and in 1817 the office was bestowed simultaneously upon Dr. Lieutenant Israel Hildreth and his son Dr. Israel, Jr. "Their revenue," says Captain Reade, "was luifavorably afifected by the dams, canals and manufacturing establishments of the companies and corporations that were more interested in the develop- ment of Lowell than in the preser\-ation of Merrimack Ri\er shad, salmon or alewives." General William Hildreth, as State Senator, was instructed in May, 1801, to present the remonstrance of the town of Dracut to the effect "that the creation of a dam across the Merrimack river at Paw- tucket falls in the manner ])roposed by the petitioners to the General Court at the last session will, in the opinion of this town, totally destroy the fish in the said river and deprive the people of the impor- tant privilege which they for a long time, even from time immemorial, have enjoyed without interference of taking near their doors the most delicate food and much of the real necessaries of life ; and no other purpose can be answered through a gratification of the avari- INDUSTRIAL BEGIXXIXGS /- 121 cious feelfngs of a few individuals who must be unacquainted with the real effect of the proposed measures or regardless of the public good." In other respects members of the Hildreth family opposed the Locks and Canals Company in questions of riparian rights long before the large manufacturing companies of Lowell were in existence. A few beginnings, nevertheless, of modern industrial establish- ments, despite such opposition, were already notable before the War of 1S12, and after the second peace with Great Britain, manufacturing received something of an impetus in this territory. Data have been preserved regarding at least three of these pioneer manufactures of the city. The most considerable manufacturer of the pre-Lowell decades, unquestionably, was Moses Hale, after whom Hale's brook was named, a man of decided mechanical ability, a prototype of many of the busi- ness men who later in the nineteenth century helped to create the industrial city of now. Moses Hale was born at West Newbury in 1765, but passed most of his youth in Dracut, where his father, Ezekiel Hale had built on Beaver brook a fulling mill, the chief business of which was to dress the cloth woven in nearby homes. In 1790, shortly after his father's death, Moses Hale moved o\er to East Chelmsford and there constructed a fulling mill on River Meadow brook, buying the land and water-power privileges from Moses Davis, whose daughter he had married. The new mill was adequately equipped for fulling, dyeing and dressing home-woven cloth. All the preliminary work was done in homes, where the farmers' wives and daughters carded the wool, spun it into yarn and wove the fabric on the hand loom. Hale's mill, on River Meadow brook, soon became famous for the expert manner in which the cloth was finished. "For men's wear," records Mr. Arthur Gilman from notes supplied by B. S. Hale, ''the cloth was fulled up thick, then napped with teasels, sheared and pressed." Hale early saw the advantage of carding wool by machin- ery. In 1801 he bought a picker and carding machine, the first of its kind to be operated in Aliddlesex county. The new apparatus proved popular. The farmers brought to the mill their wool packed in sheets. After it had gone through the carding machine the rolls were carefully taken up by the handful and laid back in the sheets. The cloth was then folded about the wool and secured with thorns. This factory on Hale's brook was a pioneer in introducing several other improvements. Shears were at that time used for shearing the cloth, the device consisting of knives set at angle and moved horizon- tally, with a crank motion. Presently Mr. Hale adopted twisted blade 122 HISTORY OF LOWELL shears, which gave a better surface. I'^inding- the cutting of dye wood by hand too slow, he framed up a cutting knife that worked between a stationary and a movable timber. His gig for napjjing cloth was a cylinder set with teasels. Hale was alive to the value of publicity fur his industry. Alnjut ihi]) hy J(ihn Xesmith. \vhi_> sold it to the Sisters of Charity, by wlimn it was used as the ell of St. John's Hospital. These statements ahcmt the ( )lfi Yellow House are doubtless sub- -^tantiallv enrrect, e.xcept that the date given of its erection is impos- sible, if, as Mrs. Griffin states, the lumber was obtained from Captain Ford's saw mill. It presumably was built some time before the Re\'0- lution, but nut as early as 1750. John Ford was only twel\-e }ears old in 1750. Mr. C. C. Chase found data tu inflicate that I-"ord supplied the timlier for the house. Mr. Stone says that according t(} his recollection there were one or two other houses in what has since become Belvidcre. The inde- fatigable Mrs. Griffin has supplied some details about th<.ise. Out on Andover street, at the corner of Old County road, was the Moses Worcester farm, bought in 1748 from Samuel Hunt. The site is still occupied by the home of Mrs. Richard W. Baker, directly descended from Moses Worcester; and o\'er the way still stands in good preser- vation, the residence built in 1802 by Eldad Worcester, grandson of the original settler. ( )n Clark road was built in 1790, by Lieutenant Thomas Clark, son of Cajjtain Jonas Clark, of the Clark's tavern at Middlesex Village, a house which has been continually in possession of members of the Clark family. These, and perhaps the original Hunt homestead, were doulitless the hiiuses recalled by Mr. Stone. On the cross road which later became Central street, Joseph War- ren kept a, tavern about where th.e American Hiiuse to-day offers hos- pitality. C)n Lawrence street Nathan Ames and John Fisher had their respective houses. Davis corner, out on Gorham street, gets its name from the Davis farm house, Johnson Davis dwelling there in 1802, as did his ancestor Elisha in earlier days of Chelmsford. Moses Hale's residence, already mentioned in cn of the West Congregational Soci- ety in Dracut. Two weeks later the first parish meeting was held at which Colonel James Varnum was elected moderator, Peter Coburn, Ir., clerk; Parker \'arnum, .Solomon (Osgood and Timothy Coburn, assessors, and Colonel James \'anuim, treasurer. Thus succeeding the original Dracut church, which was in Paw- tucketville, was started the oldest church in the city of Lowell at which worship has been continuous to this day. It is interesting that for a number of years this church was of the Presbyterian rather than INDUSTRIAL BEGINNINGS 129 the Congregational faith. Shtirtly after its formation many families on the East Chelmsford side of the river began to attend this chvirch, having obtained from the Legislature a special act thus setting them off for parochial purposes. The annals of the church at Chelmsford, with which, until after 1820, many of the families of the ancient Neck were still associated, belongs to the history of that town rather than of Lowell. They are unusually copious and satisfactory, due in part to the fact that the Rev. Wilkes Allen in 1820 prepared a history of Chelmsford, which, published at the expense of the town, is accounted as the fir.st book of local history of its sort ever produced in America. For cemeteries the families at East Chelmsford used either the one still preserved at the corner of School and Branch streets, that over the river near the Pawtucketville church, the Hildreth cemetery, already described, or the one on the heights in Belvidere, which has long since disappeared. Schooling for East Chelmsford children was not interrupted even during the distressed years of the Revolution. The educational facili- ties of the time were slight, as judged by standards of to-day, but such as they were they seem to have been maintained scrupulously. An indication of the territory covered by a single school district is given in a town vote of 1781 : "Nine months Righting school 3 mos in Neck so called extending from Mr. Timothy Clarks to the mouth of Concord & to Mr. Simeon Morses & to Mr. Joseph Pierces .So to Mr. Philip Parkers." From this specification it is seen that all the children of the triangle formed by a line extending from the Clark place on Baldwin street, Middlesex Village, through the Highlands to Moore street had three months of instruction at a little red school house on School street. The only exceptions were a few who attended the grammar school at Chelmsford Centre. It is proof of the com- paratively rapid growth of the Neck that by 1794 in the same terri- tory there were three schoolhouses : One at Middlesex Village, one at Parker and Powell streets and one on Pawtucket street at the cor- ner of Salem street. The social and intellectual life of the whole neighborhood appears to have received an impetus after 1787. In 1794 the Chelmsford Social Library was established at the Centre, an institution which continued for a century, until succeeded by the present Free Public Library. When the .Social Library was started there were Init nine libraries in Massachusetts outside of Boston. A new interest in ]5roblems of scientific agriculture was nothing sporadic. There was organized in 1794 a Chelmsford societv for the "promotion of useful improvements in agriculture." This movement J^9 I30 HISTORY OF LOWELL was significant of the pnioressive sjiirit of the people of this district, for there were, so far as known, at that (kite but three other agricul- tural societies in the United States. The association was incorporated February 28, 1803, under the name ni "'The Western Society of Mid- dlesex Husbandmen." At that time there was but one other incor- porated agricultural society in Massachusetts. CHAPTER VII. Lowell and the Factory System. The creation of the first large American factory town at the forks of the Merrimack and Concord was an achievement of the second and third decades of the nineteenth century. Within fifteen years a rural neighborhood, in which a few old- time manufacturing industries were conducted on a limited scale, was transformed into an active industrial city of a kind now familiar to most districts of the United States, but then regarded as one of the wonders of the continent. A\'ater-powers were developed in rapid succession. Farm lands were sold to manufacturing companies and private individuals, often with an accompaniment of intrigue and speculation. An influx of operatives, at first from the nearby farms and villages, and later from foreign countries, set in. Many merchants and professional men saw the advantages of settling in a community whose growth was the marvel of New England. Churches and schools were established. The New England town form of government was projected for the expanding community, only to be succeeded ten years later by a city charter, the third of its sort to be granted in Massachusetts. Many of the institutions which now are an essential part of Lowell were started prior to 1836, the 3-ear of urbanization. Most of the problems which remain to be solved in a complex society had begun to appear before Van Buren relinquished the presidency of the Nation. The fact of priority gives any topic an interest that is not wholly factitious ; the pioneership of Lowell in the evolution of the American industrial community renders the details of its progressive evolution one of general as well as local significance. Here is material for inten- sive study of the economic and social changes incident to the coming of modern capitalism in North America. That which now happened in New England was not, of course, without precedent elsewhere. The factory system, the basic feature of modern industrialism, which was definitely brought to East Chelms- ford with the incorporation of the Merrimack Manufacturing Com- pany in 1822, was already well established in Lancashire and other districts of Great Britain. The story of its inception and advancement, and of its progressive adaptation to American conditions, has been interestingly sketched in Jonathan Thayer Lincoln's little book, "The Factory System," and in a more condensed form by the same author in "The American Business Encyclopaedia." The general aspects of this phase of social evolution, out of which we have not yet emerged, 132 HISTORY OF LOWELL are (|uitc' pertinent tu the special evolution of the city of Lowell. FulK', indeed, to understand how momentous a change was involved in the life of the community on the site of the former Indian metrop- olis when the great mills began to go up, one needs to have a sure idea of what was involved in the introduction of the factory systeiri. The narrative of the origin of this system takes one back to the older countries of Europe, where in the eighteenth century it began to be seen that wealth in manufactured articles could be created more rapidly by means of machinery, with use of subdivided labor, than by means of the ancient handicrafts. "Obvious as are the productive advantages of the factory system," says Lincoln, "society did not adopt the new method in a large way until inventive genius had cre- ated the modern factory. The early manufactures of textiles and other articles were handicrafts, properly so-called. They were pursued by craftsmen, living and working at their own homes, mostly in rural districts. Down to the beginning of the eighteenth century master- clothiers in the larger towns sent into the surrounding country sec- tions sacks of wool to be spun into yarn, returned to the consignors, and by them redistributed among the weavers. Often members of a single family combined to take care under one roof of the three opera- tions of carding, spinning and weaving. The workers generally car- ried on more or less farm work at the same time. This domestic sys- tem has been praised by advocates of the handicraft revival. It had its pleasant features, but it contained in an exaggerated form evils — such as child labor — which are by some supposed to be peculiar to the factory system." English manufactures, whether of wool, linen or cotton (which seems to have first been introduced in commercial quantities about 1641) were pursued, as Mr. Lincoln has stated, after the fashion of handicraft down to the date of Richard Arkwright's invention of a spinning frame. It seems, indeed, to be established that England, although des- tined to manufacture for the whole world, was somewhat slow in securing its start as an industrial nation. The Anglo-Saxon genius, as Dean Edwin F. Gay, of the Harvard Graduate School of Business Ad- ministration, has urged in his Lowell Institute lectures on "The Me- chanical Inventions," is "for the practical — for the application of science — but even in these practical works it was for a time more imitative than truly inventive. A letter written in 1701 by a represen- tative of the East India Company in defense of the company's impor- tation of cheap printed and 'painted' cloth from India challenged the national ability to make progress in technical directions and averred that there was 'only one saw mill in all the land,' whereas, Holland had many, and did, indeed, 'abound in mills and engines'." THE FACTORY SYSTEM 133 England's turn, nevertheless, to become a manufacturing country was foreseen in the forepart of the eighteenth century, the epoch in which arose for the first time a numerous and prosperous middle class for whom the hand industries could not turn out articles of clothing and household equipment in sufficient abundance and of the right price to satisfy their rising standards of comfort. The result was a new era which followed closely upon a period in which the artistic handicrafts of Great Britain reached a nearer approximation to perfection than ever before or since. Under William and Mary and Queen Anne, the wood-carver, Grinling Gibbons, and his many assistants and imitators filled palaces and manor houses with wood-work that now ranks among the foremost treasures of art in English public and private collections. The Huguenot iron-worker, Jean Tijou, employed for many years by Sir Christopher Wren, on St. Paul's Cathedral, trained up in his shop a group of native apjirentices who for about half a cen- tury designed and executed iron gates and grill work, the surviving examples of which are a model for every architect of every country. The early eighteenth century was the day of the "grand tour" to France and Italy, made by young men whose parents could afford it ; out of these youthful travels grew a prevalent disposition to become connoisseurs and dilettanti. Many Italian stucco workers and plas- terers settled in England Furniture underwent successive refine- ments at the hands of Chippendale, Sheraton, the .\dainses and others whose styles were reflected in American colonial workshops. English silver work and pewter were at their best under the first Georges. The invention of copper rolled or "Sheffield" plate carried the finest silverware designs of the period into the homes of people of moderate means. That marvels of pottery were produced by Wedgwood, Wall and others of the west counties hardly need be said. It was a time of improving taste and expanding luxury, and in this century of enlarg- ing human desires, English wit began, at first imitatively, to take up the problems of cheapening production and of thereljy stimulating consumption of commodities. As Mr. Gay says: England's turn, it seems quite clear, was toward the practical. Very early in England there occurred a great spread of popular belief in the possibilities of science. Indeed this faith became so great that it verged upon the grotesque. It had for one thing this important result that it tempted out the money of private investors for use in enterprise. Among the many valid schemes there were still more "wildcats." One promoter banked so much on the faith of the public in inventive schemes that his prospectus plainly announced that stock was "to be subscribed for a project to be divulged." This popular faith was reenforced by the example of Holland, where much practical progress had already been made. Holland had shown the way, it was said, and England was counseled to emulate. Wherever Englishmen could lay thci- hands on a good thing, in the 134 HISTORY OF LOWELL printing' trades, in the manufacture of paper, in the metal trades, they incorporated it into their own industry. Finally, with the increasing subdivision of labor in some of the special industries, a form of the factory system had become developed even before the machines entered. When the great inx-entions began, one step of progress literally forced the demand for another. The increased development of the weaving business caused a demand for more yarn, and there was a rapid succession of inventions to provide it. Chief among these Ark- wright's water frame literally necessitated factory productiiin. run as it was by water power. With the mule an enormous amount of yarn was produced, and the pressure next began to bear on the weaving side, to make use of all the yarn that was made. Cartwright's loom followed. There was trouble to bleach all this cloth by the old proc- esses, and chloride bleaching was developed. Thus necessity mothered invention within a single industry. Btit one industry also catised a demand upon other industries. To provide machines of the type required, the iron supply had to be developed, and for the steam engine it was necessary to produce a cylinder that could be bored with accuracy. The means for mining and transporting coal also recjuired development to meet the demand. Sir Richard Arkwright's spinning frame, as just intimated, stands nt the beginning of the new phase of civilization. The fascinating story of the career of the humble barlier of Preston, whose inventions raised him to a baronetcy and made him the father of industrialism, cannot be rehearsed here. It has been told authoritatively in Richard Whately Cooke-Taylor's "The Modern Factory System." Notice should be taken, however, as bearing directly on the changes that occurred in Lowell from 1820 onward, that in 1769 Arkwright ob- tained a patent for a water frame s])inning machine which within a very few years ptit literallv millions of home-spinning wheels (.nit of business. The invent(ir himself said of this machine, in the preamble of the specification attached ti) the application for a patent, that he "had by great study and long application invented a new piece of machinerv never before found out, practiced or used, for the making of weft or varn from C(jtton, flax and wnol, which would be of great utility to a great many manufacturers, as well as to his Majesty's sub- jects in general, bj- emplo}-ing a great number of poor people in work- ing the said machinerv, much superior to any heretofore manufac- tured or made." This Arkwright spinning frame, operated by power, had spindles that were much more productive than those of the cottage wheel, mul- tiplying many fold the value of the labor of the operator. The frame itself, moreover, was from the first far too cumbersome to be set up in a private house. It required a w.irkshop. a factory, for efi'ective opera- tion. This need of segregation of labor was foreseen by Arkwright, who in the year of his receiving his patent erected at Nottingham an THE FACTORY SYSTEM 135 unpretentious little mill for cotton spinning, its machinery turned by two horses harnessed to a treadmill. Thus at about the date when the farmer folk of the American Chelmsford and Dracut were drilling their train-bands against the increasing tyranny of the London government was born the system which later was to revolutionize all conditions of living at Pavvtucket Falls, and which was to make the ])resent city of Lowell possible. Other mechanical improvements, as Dean Gay has noted, followed '.he Arkwright spinning frame, as for example, the inventor's jjatents of 1775 for carding, drawing and roving machines, to be employed "on preparing silk, cotton, flax and wool for spinning." The new system also made much use of previous inventions, as of John Kaves' fly- shuttle oi 1738 and James Hargreaves' spinning jenny of 1767. In 1779 Samuel Crompton, a practical weaver of Bolton, invented the mule-jenny, so-called because, like the crossing of the horse and the donkey, it combined the principles of Hargreaves' jenny and Ark- wright's water frame. By this time the most essential machinery was comjilete ; though many subsequent modifications and improvements have been made, in several notable instances by Lowell inventors. The first power loom was fashioned in 1785 by Edmund Cartwright, a clerg-yman. In that year, too, a Nottingham cotton mdl for the first time in the history of the industry installed a steam engine. These things were happening, it should be recalled, during years in which much manufacturing of the primiti\e sort was carried for- ward at East Chelmsford and Dracut Navy Yard, just as in hundreds of other several communities of New England. Precisely as in Eng- land before Arkwright's invention, the factory was a clearing house from which yarn s]nni in the nearl)y homes was sent out again to the home to be woven on the hand loom, the miller's functions being those of carding, fulling and finishing. The older system was obviously quite dift'erent from that which began with Arkwright's plan of hav- ing all the processes of textile manufacture carried on under a single roof. The economies of the factory system fr(.)m its first davs were sur- prising to whoever became acquainted with them. "A handloom weaver," says Lincoln, "was highly comj)etent if he produced two pieces of shirting a week. Early in the nineteenth century an average power loom weaver wove seven pieces in the same time. Two hun- dred looms in a factory operated by half as many weavers produced as much cloth as wiiuld ha\e come from 875 looms scattered among the households where the women had meals and children and the men gardens and live stocks to look after. Under methods of the present day the disparity between hand weaving and power weaving is even more striking." The sex problem in industrj- was simultaneously [36 HISTORY OF LOWELL intniduced liy the factory. "Women," says Arthur Harrison Cole, in his "History of the Wool Manufacture in the United States to the Establishment of the Factory System," "could now he substituted for men in the j^rocess of weaving. The hard labor of operating the har- ness and 'beating-up' the cloth as it was woven, so as to make it com- pact and firm, was now obviated.'' American men of affairs in the first days of the Reputilic, as already observed, were more or less excited by the uiigrowth of this new form of manufacturing in luigland. A survey of the situation was made in Alexander Hamilton's celebrated report on domestic manufactures, which gives this imjircssive list: "Great quantities of coarse cloths, coating, serges and flannels, linsey-woolseys, hosiery of wool, cotton and thread, coarse fustians, jeans, and muslins, coverlets, and counter])anes. tow linens, coarse shirtings, sheetings, towellings, and table linen, and various mixtures of wool and cotton, and of cot- ton and flax, are made in the household way ; and, in manv instances, to an extent not only sufficient fcjr the sup[)ly of the family in which they are made, but for sale, and even in some cases for exportation. It is computed, in a number of districts, that two-thirds, three-fourths and even four-fifths of all the clothing of the inhabitants, are made by themselves." That there were more economical ways for spinning and weaving those fabrics now began to be understood. Immediate imitation of these methods, however, was not practicable for various reasons. Trade secrets were carefully guarded abriiacl. England jealously pre- \cnted ex]iortation of machinery that might create commercial rivals elsewhere. Not many peo]5le in America imderstood clearly as yet the economic and social aspects of the industrial revolution that was in jjrogress in Lancashire and Yorkshire. Interest in economic sub- jects was generally vague, as probably in the minds of the Massachu- setts Legislature of 1786, which ap])ointecl Richard Cranch, of the Senate, and Messrs. Clarke and Rowdoin, of the House, "to view any new invented machines that are making within the Commonwealth for the purpose of manufacturing sheep's wool and cotton wool, and report what measures are pro])er for the Legislature to take to encour- age the same." This quest at least led the committee to Bridgewater, where, according to Samuel Batchelder, some machinery made by R(>l')crt and .'Mexander Barr included the Arkwright improvements. As a conse- quence of a favorable report from the committee the General Court on November 16, 1786, granted the sum of £200 "to enable them to com- plete the said three machines, and also a roping machine, and to con- struct such other machines as are necessary for the purpose of card- ing. ro])iiig and spinning of sheep's wool, as well as of cotton wool." THE FACTORY SYSTEM 13; This State aided enterprise at Bridgewater seems not to have suc- ceeded, for it does not again come into the records. For Beverly is claimed the distinction of harboring the first Amer- ican cotton factory, though one would hardly say that it entertained the factory system as it is now known. ''The Beverly company," states Montgomery in his "History of the Cotton Industry in Amer- ica," "commenced operation in 1787, and are supposed to be the first company that made any progress in the manufacture of cotton goods (that at Bridgewater had been on a very limited scale) ; yet the dififi- culties vmder which they labored — the extraordinary losses of ma- terials in the instruction of their servants and workmen — the high prices of machines unknown to their mechanics, and both intricate and delicate in their construction, together with other incidents which usually attend a new business, were such that the company were put to the necessity of applying to the Legislature for assistance, to save them from being compelled to abandon the enterprise altogether." Such, at Beverly, was the beginning of cotton manufacture in North America. The new company experienced difficulties which are a matter of record. In 1790 it received from the State a grant of £1,000 to be so expended as most efifectually to further the making of cotton piece goods in the Commonwealth. The enterprise continued for some time further, but it lost its reputation after more extensive and better equipped factories were built at Pawtucket. Providence. Waltham and, finally, at Lowell Reference should be made in passing to the successful efforts of Samuel Slater, who came in November, 1789, from one of Arkwright's mills in England, to establish factories in Rhode Island. This indus- trial pioneer, whose descendants still control jjroperties which he started. arri\'ed without working drawings of the machines which he desired to reproduce in America. \Vith the help of a good memory and knowledge of mathematics he was able to construct machinery which served its i)urpose reasonablv well. Beginning his operations at Pawtucket in December, 1790, he soon after opened the first Ameri- can cotton yarn mill at New Providence. The progress of the busi- ness for tnany years was discouragingly slow. In January, 1807, there were but 4,000 spindles in operation in Rhode Island. These furnished yarns for hand-weaving at home. The country still imported nearly all its cotton cloth from England and the East Indies, the receipts from Calcutta alone amounting in 1807-08 to about 53,000.000 yards. The cost of spinning Slater's yarn is said to have been about double that (if the whole jirocesses of spinning. wea\"ing and finishing in the Lowell mills of a generation later. Most of these enterprises of Southern New England were pros- trated during the War of 1812. They came to life again in the revival of bnsinr",s after the war. 138 HISTORY OF LOWELL Througliout this time tlie factor}' system, even in the cotton manu- facture, hardly existed as it is now known. Weaving was still done mostly by hand, for the Cartwright loom, though invented in 1785, was jealously guarded by the English. It did not become available for American use until nearly a generation later. Such as it was, further- more, the primitive Cartwright invention required many years of suc- cessive improvements to become the smooth running, efficient machine of iTiodern manufacture. In the first looms the warp was perpendicu- lar, the reed fell with a force of at least fifty pounds and the springs which threw the shuttle were, as Alfred Gilman puts it, "strong enough to have thrown a congreve rocket, and it required the power of two strong men to operate it very slowly for a very short time." Francis Cabot Lowell and His Power Loom — I'rancis Cabot Lowell, who studied the conditions of manufacture in England in the years 1810 and 181 1, who took the initiative in devising and financing a practical power loom for American use. who interested himself in the social as well as the commercial effects of the factory system, is, by general admission, tiie originator of the American cotton manufac- ture. His family name is perpetuated in the city which, as an outcome of his pioneer enterprise at Waltham, grew up on the site of the ancient Indian metropolis of the Merrimack. Just before the city of Lowell celebrates the centenary, the one hundred and fiftieth anniversary (if this representative of a famous family, its patron saint, will demand commemoration. The father of the .\inerican factory system was the fourth child of Judge John and Sarah Higginson Lowell, of Newburyport. where he was born in 1775. The family, descended from Percival Lowell, is one which has had a long succession of distinguished members from the earliest days of the Massachusetts Bay colony to the ])resent time. Judge Lowell was a leading man of his community, a member of the Provincial Assembly of 1776 and of the Constitutional Convention of 1780. Francis Cabot Lowell was graduated from Harvard College in 1703. As a young man he undertook mercantile business in A\hich he was remarkably successful. His visit to England, made just before the War of 1S12, was on account nf his health which was already fail- ing. In 181 1 he was in Edinl)urgh. with his family, according to the reminiscences of Nathan Appleton. and thence he wrote to his friends I if ha\-ing l)ecome interested in cotton manufacturing and of his de- termination to visit Manchester before his return to .America. Lowell came back in 1813 at a time when such industries as the United States ])ossessed were flat on account of the war with England. His acti\e mind saw the im])ortance of the economic independence of the country. The practical undertaking upon which he now entered is best described in Nathan .Simpleton's words: "He and Mr. Patrick THE FACTORY SYSTEM 139 T. Jackson came to us one day on the Boston Exchange and stated that they had determined to establish a cotton manufacturing company, that they had purchased a water power in Waltham (Bemis's paper mill), and that they had obtained an act of incorporation, and Mr. Jackson had agreed to give up all other business and take the manage- ment of the concern." The authorized capital of this new manufacture at Waltham was $400,000, but only $100,000 was to be raised until the company was assuredly successful. The original promoters themselves subscribed most of the capital. Mr. Appleton took $5,000. Lowell, as might be surmised from general knowledge of human nature, did not enter upon this scheme with the unanimous support of his family connections and friends. Henry Lee, in an article in the "Boston Daily .Advertiser," in 1830, recalled that "many of his near- est connections used all their influence to dissuade him from the pursuit of what they deemed a visionary and dangerous scheme. They, too, were among those who knew, or thought they knew, the full strength of his mind, the accuracy of his calm calculations, his industry, patience and perseverance, and, withal, his power and influ- ence over others, which was essential to his success ; they still thought him mad, and did not recover from that error till they themselves had lost their own senses, of which they evinced s^-mptoms at least, by shortly purchasing into the business of this visionary schemer at thirty, forty, fifty and even sixty per cent, advance." Much of the stibseqiient prosperity of Francis Cabot Lowell's first attempt to introduce modern manufacturing in this country was un- doubtedly due to his good fortune securing the services of a mechani- cal genius in the person of Paul Moody, whose name is perpetuated in one of the principal streets of Lowell. This inventor was born at Newbury, May 23, 1779, in the sixth generation from the saddler, Wil- liam Moody, of Ipswich, England, who settled in 1634 at the Massa- chusetts Ipswich, and a 3'ear later moved into what is now Newbury. Paul Moody was one of seven sons of Captain Paul Moody. His aca- demic education was limited. \\'hen sixteen years old he learned the weaver's craft, at which he became expert. He presently went into business with Jacob Perkins, of Amesbury, who had invented a nail- cutting machine. In 1812 he was in the employ of Kendrick and Worthen, manufacturers of carding machinery. Later, with Ezra Worthen, Thomas Boardman and Samuel Wigglesworth, he began to make satinets, a popular mixture of wool and cotton, their firm being incorporated, Februarj- 16. 1813, as the Amesbury Wool and Cotton Manufacturing Company, capitalized at $46,000. Finally in 1814 Mr. Moody went to Waltham to superintend the setting-up of the machin- ery of the new mill [)lanned by Messrs. Lowell and Jackson. Here he I40 HISTORY OF LOWELL found jilenty of exercise for his inventi\-e and organizing talent. One of his less known discoveries was that of the economical value of leather belting, afterwards in almost general use in mill drive. The power loom with which Francis Cabot Lowell hoped to revo- lutionize American textile manufacture was not the Cartwright loom which was already in operation in Lancashire. It was one on which he himself had worked experimentally in a store on Broad street, Bos- ton, employing a C(.~iuple of men to turn a crank and thus furnish the power. By the time the building at Waltham was complete the first loom was ready for installation. "I well recollect," writes Appleton, "the state of admiration and satisfaction with which we sat by the hour, watching the Iseautiful movements of this new and wonderful machine, destined, as it evidently was, to change the character of all textile industry. This was in the autumn of 1814." Lowell appears from this account to have been a mechanic of no mean order. At Wal- iham, nevertheless, Paul ]\Ioody's services were recjuired to invent an important mo\ement to which the loom owed its complete success. Other essential innovations for which Moody was responsible during the years he s]3ent at Waltham are described with considerable precision by Re\-. H. A. Miles in his "Lowell As It is:'' He invented the "dead spindle," which was introduced ;it Waltham and is still used throughout the mills at Lowell. The Rhode Island machinery emploj'ed the "Ii\-e spindle," copied from the English. The product of the former is greater, though it requires more power. About the time of starting their mill at Waltham, Mr. Lowell and Mr. Moody went to Taunton, Mass., to procure a machine for winding the filling upon a boljbin. Just as the former gentlemen were concluding a con- tract for these machines Mr. Moody suggested that if they would re- turn to Waltham without them, he thought he could invent a machine to s])in tlie yarn upon the bolilnn the same conical form in which the winder put it on, and thus supersede the necessity of the intervention of that machine. Upon their return he invented what is called the "fill- ing frame," a machine which he at once perfected, and which is still used both at Waltham and at Lowell. Near the same time Mr. Lowell told Mr. Moody that they must ha\-e a "governor," to regulate the speed of their wheels. This was an ap]jaratus of which Mr. Moody had never heard, and the only information concerning it which his friends could supply was that, having seen one in England, he remembered there were two iron balls susj^ended on two rods, connected at one end like a pair of tongs. When the wheels were in too rapid motion these balls were driven apart, and produced a partial closing of the water gate; when on the other hand, tlieir motion was slow, the balls ajiproached each other and eft'ected a greater opening of the gate, by which an increased motion was obtained. This conversation was held in Boston, at Mr. Lowell's house. The gentlemen separated with an understanding that the "governor" should forthwith be ordered from England. Mr. Moody, on his ride to Waltham, could not get those balls out of his mind. They were flying around in his brain the whole THE FACTORY SYSTEM 141 of that day and night. The next day he went to the shop and chalked out the plan of some wheels which he ordered made. Not long after this Mr. Lowell was at W'altham. and Mr. Moody inquired if the "gov- ernor" had been ordered from England. On learning that it had not Mr. Moody produced the "governor" which he had made. It was set up in the mill, and that identical one was in successful use until 1832. The "governors" now used in this city are all copied from that. Mr. Mood}', with the assistance of Mr. Lowell, was the inventor of the "double speeder." This machine was set in operation at Waltham and was patented. Some time after this the patent right was infringed upon by some mechanics who had worked upon the machine at Wal- tham, and prosecution ensued. The case was tried before Judge Story and was argued by Mr. Webster. The late Mr. Bowditch, then of Salem, was requested to examine the principles, both of the original and the imitated machines, in order to appear as a witness at the trial. Mr. Bowditch was afterwards heard to say that seldom had his mind been more severely taxed, for the "double speeder'" required for its construction the greatest mathematical power of any piece of mechan- ism with which he had become acquainted. The idea of this machine originated with Mr. Moody, but the mathematical calculations neces- sary for its construction were made by Mr. Lowell. The Lowell power loom was not without a competitor almost from the outset. Closel)' following upon its appearance came the im- portation of the Horrocks loom at Pawtucket, Rhode Island, in 1817. The latter w-as of English devising, on the basis of patents taken out in 1803, 1805 and 1813. Though inferior to the Lowell machine in having a crank instead of a cam to lift the harness, it otherwise was simple and efficient and could be built for about $70 as opposed to $300, the cost of the loom controlled by the Boston Manufacturing Com- pany. The system of company boarding houses and other provisions for the welfare of operatives which Mr. Lowell and his associates intro- duced at Waltham had iew, if any, counterparts in the old world. The germination of this principle of looking out for the human units of production, as well as for the machines, appeared a little later in the initial scheme of the city of Lowell. The attitude of responsibility for the condition of employees which prevailed from the outset of the experiment at East Chelmsford thus dated from the philanthropic mind of Francis Cabot Lowell, who "had another idea in his mind which was one of the greatest impor- tance, and that was the moral and religious instruction of the opera- tives." Rev. George Kengott, in "The Record of a City," follows the tradition that Lowell and his friends were much influenced by the humanitarian philosophy of Robert Owen. Be that as it may, the Boston Manufacturing Company as early as 1814 built model board- ing houses and presently undertook schools, a church, and the "Rum- ford Institute of Mutual Instruction," and when the question of estab- 142 HISTORY OF LOWELL lishment of mills at Lowell was under consideration, according to Mr. Appleton, "the question arose and was deeply considered whether this degradation [of the type familiar in English factory towns] was the result of the peculiar occupation or other distinct causes." As Rod- ney Hemenway expresses i^, in his "Genesis of the Social System in New England Manufacturing," the Boston promoters deliberately "chose the example of that wise, philanthropic manufacturer-reformer, Robert Owen, rather than that of the average factory manager with whom the\' came into contact during their studies of the manufactur- ing question." Even a sketchy record of Francis Cabot Lowell's achievements would be incomplete without reference to his pioneership protec- tionism. One of the chief results of American distresses during the War of 1812 was that shortly after it the Nati(.in committed itself to a policy of subsidizing home industries through protective tariffs. \\'hereas, England, under the influence of the jjhilosophical anarchism of Adam Smith and Jeremy Bentham, had already evolved a theory of free trade, the United States definitely adopted the plan of protecting the Nation's capitalists and laborers from the effects of world-wide com- petition. Without this legislative encouragement, it hardly need be said, the use of the water powers of the Merrimack for manufacturing purposes would probably have been delayed for years, or even genera- tions, and it is interesting to note that Francis Cabot Lowell led the fight for recognition of the protective principle which was due shortly to make possiljle the upbuilding of the city that now bears his name. In the winter of 1816 Lowell was in W'ashington and there, as Edward E\'erett relates in his memoirs : In confidential intercourse with some of the leading men of Con- gress, he fixed their attention on the importance, the prospects and the dangers of the cotton manufacture, and the policy of shielding it from foreign competition by legislative jurisdiction. Constituti(_inal objections at that time were unheard of. The Middle States, under the lead of Pennsylvania, were strong in the interest of manufactur- ing. The West was about equally divided. The New England States, attached from the settlement of the country to commercial and navi- gating pursuits, were less disposed to embark in a new policy which was thought adverse to some branches of foreign trade, and particu- larly to the trade with India, from which the supply of coarse cottons was principally derived. The planting States, and cmincntl\- South Carolina, then represented by several gentlemen of distinguished abil- ity, held the balance between the rival interests. To the planting interest it was demonstrated by Mr. Lowell that by the establishment of the cotton manufacture in the United States the southern planter would greatly increase his market. He would furnish the raw ma- terial for all those American fabrics which should take the place ot manufactures imported from India or partly made in England from Till-: FACTORY SYSTEM 143 India cotton. He would thus, out of his own produce, be enabled to pay for all the supplies which he required from the North. This simple and conclusive view of the subject prevailed, and determined a portion of the South to throw its weight in favor of a protective tariff. The minimum duty on cotton fabrics, the corner stone of the system, was projiosed \)y Air. Lowell, and is believed to have been an original con- ception on his part. It was recommended by Mr. Lowndes, it was advocated by Mr. Calhoun, and was incorporated into the law of 1816. To this provision of law, the fruit of the intelligence and influence of Mr. Lowell, New England owes that branch of industry, which has made amends for the diminution of her foreign trade ; which has kept her prosperous under the exhausting drain of her population to the West ; which has brought a market for his agricultural products to the farmer's door ; and which, while it has conferred these blessings on this part of the country, has been productive of good, and nothing but good to every other portion of it. For these public benefits — than which none, not directly connected with the establishment of our liberties, are of a higher order or of a more comprehensive scope — the people of the United States are indebted to Mr. Francis Cabot Lowell ; and in conferring his name upon the noble city of the arts in our neighbor- hood a monument not less appropriate than honorable has been reared in his memory. What memorial of a great public benefactor so be- coming as the bestowal of his name on a prosperous community which has started, as it were, from the soil at the touch of his wand? Pyra- mids and mausoleums may erumble to earth, and brass and marble mingle with the dust they cover, but the pure and well deserved renown, which is thus incorporated with the busy life of an intelligent people, will be remembered till the long lapse of ages and the vicissi- tudes of fortune shall reduce all of America to oblivion and decay. Francis Cabot Lowell did not live to see the fruition of the enter- prises for which his sagacity and persistence were mainly responsible. He died at the early age of forty-one. He had, of course, no direct connection with the community which later adopted his name at the instance of its benevolent despot, Kirk Boott. It is not known that he ever saw the water powers of the Merrimack and Concord at East Chelmsford. Of his business acumen, which placed the cotton industry for the first time on a firm basis, his friend, Nathan Appleton, relates: It is remarkable how few changes, in this respect [of installing machinery and routing processes through the mill] have been tnade since those established by him in the first mill built in Waltham. It is also remarkable how accurate were his calculations as to the expense at which goods could be made. He used to say that the only circum- stance which made him distrust his calculations was that he could bring them to no other result but one which was too favorable to be credible. His calculations, however, did not lead him so far as to make him imagine that the same goods which were then selling at thirty cents a yard would at any time be sold at six cents, and without a loss to the manufacturer, as has since been done. He died in 1817, beloved 144 HISTORY OF LOWELL and respected by all who knew liini. He is entitled to the credit of having introduced the new system in the cotton manufacture under which it has grown up so rapidly ; for. although Messrs. Jackson and Moody were men of unsurpassi-d energy and talent in their way, it was I\Ir. Lowell who was the informing soul which gave direction and form to the whole proceeding. The New Life at Old Wamesit — In 1820 and immediately there- after the communities at Pawtucket and Massic Falls were jogging on in the old ways which have been described. At Pawtucket Bridge, Elisha Ford (1778-1855). son of Captain John Ford, surveyor and hydraulic engineer, represented the contemporary interest in water power. Over at Chelmsford Centre the Rev. Wilkes Allen had just brought out, through a town appropriation for that purpose, "the first book of town history issued in America." Middlesex \'illage, as has been seen, was an active hamlet, through business due to the Middle- sex canal, and through the glass works. The substantial families then living between Middlesex and the Chelmsford bridgehead at the falls ])ursued their handicrafts and agricultural vocations, and many of them attended divine worship on the north side of the Merrimack. Between Clark's Ferry and the Navy Yard, Dracut looked much as it now would, if the mid-century and later constructions could be re- moved and only the fine old white houses, some of which happily sur- vive, were left to maintain their dignity among the elms. The Hild- reth bailiwick about the Great Bunt still had its annual excitement when the shad and alewives ran. The yellow meeting house at Dracut Centre, the object of many controversies, was now an established insti- tution. In East Dracut, Joseph Bradley Varnum, the greatest man of this ])art of Massachusetts, had just passed away, in Septem- ber, 1821, from angina pectoris, having shortly before his death dic- tated to his niece. Miss Harriett Swett Varnum, tlie aut(il:iiography which has been frequently Cjuoted in this history. In the downtown district of the future city the family of Tylers was conspicuous, Na- than Tyler owning nearly all the land from the old Pawtucket or Navi- gation Canal, to the Merrimack and as far down as the mouth of the Concord near which the Tyler mansion stood. Over the Concord was the Gedney mansion, the old yellow house, already described. Like the Hildreths, the Tylers took great interest in the fisheries. Some remi- niscences of the late Captain Silas Tyler give a vivid picture of the customs of the time : "The best haul of fish I ever knew was eleven hundred shad and eight or ten thousand alewives. This was in the Concord just below the Middlesex Mills. My uncle, Joe Tyler, once got so many alewives that he did not know what to do with them. The law allowed us to fish two days in the week in the Concord and three in the Merrimack. * * * The Dracut folks fished in the pond at THE FACTORY SYSTEM 145 the foot of Pawtucket Falls. They would set their nets there on for- bidden days. On one occasion the fish wards from Billerica came and carried off their nets. The wardens, when they returned to Billerica, spread the nets in the grass to dry. The next night the fishermen, in a wagon with a span of horses, drove tn Billerica, gathered up the nets, brought them back and reset them in the pond. People would come fifteen or twenty iniles to procure these fish. Shad were worth five dollars per hundred and salmon ten cents per pound." The neigh- borhood was one whose simple farmer people, fairly prosperous, lived the kind of life their ancestors had prescribed for them, with much hard work, and much merriment and gayety. In the autumn of 1821 Thomas M. Clark, merchant of Newbury- port and a director of the Pawtucket Canal, through which logs were rafted down to the head of Hunt's Falls, came to East Chelmsford and began tn negotiate for some of the farm lands whose titles had come down from the original Wamesit Neck proprietorship. He began by buying the Nathan Tyler farm. This tract included about forty acres, covering the territory between Merrimack street on the north, the lower end of Pawtucket canal on the south, the present Merrimack canal on the west and coming across Merrimack street near the present Merrimack square and extending to the junction of the ri\-ers. For this property eight thousand dollars were paid. Be- tween Merrimack street and the river was the sixty-acre farm of Josiah Fletcher, which sold for the same price. Above the Fletcher projjerty was the Chee\'er farm, the homestead of which long stood just above the Lawrence corporation. Here were one hundred and ten acres, nine undivided tenths of which Mr. Clark secured for $1,800, with an option oil the rcmnining cjne-tenth for twd hundred dollars. "The owner of the other tenth," says Miles, "had agreed to convey it for two hundred dollars ; but dying insolvent, it was sold by order of the court, the Locks and Canals Company giving, for seven and a half tenths thereof, upwards of three thousand dollars. The remaining two and a half tenths were Ijought a year afterwards for nearly fi\c thou- sand dollars — so rapidly did the \alue of the land rise. In 1S22 the farm of the widow of Joseph W arren was purchased, a tract of alxjut thirty acres, l}'ing between Central street and Concord river, with the Pawtucket canal on the north, and extending up nearly as far as Rich- mond's Mills on the south. For this the sum of five thousand dollars was i)aid. Within these boundaries Mr. Thomas Ifurd owned two or three acres of land in the near neighborhood of his woolen mill, which was situated where the Mechanics' Mills now stand. The farm of Mr. Jose])h I'^letcher. the homestead of which still stands on the high land in the rear of the np]uT ])art oi Appleton street, came down to the I'riwtiicki'i canal on the north and Central street on the east, and con- I in 146 HISTORY OF LOWELL taincd ahuul diu' hundred acres. This was not purchased until 1824, for which the sum of ten thousand dollars was paid." These purchases of the ancient farmsteads of Wamesit Neck had not gone far before the neighborhood began to suspect that Mr. Clark, of Newburyport, must represent clients more influential and ambitious than the proprietors of the transportation canal which annually en- abled a few million feet of i^ine lumber from u|.) country to circumvent the tortuous channel of Pawtucket brails. What was really ha|ipen- ing soon became evident to their astonished eyes. The prosperity of the Waltham cotton manufacture led to a search which in the early twenties induced several Boston capitalists to con- sider where next they might plant a factory town. The horse power developed by the Charles river is small, and there is no other stream in the immediate neighborhood of Boston that could be used for a large installation. Hence the manufacturing interests already must look further afield. The narrati\e of the quest for a dependable supply of power can- not be told better than In' follov.ing Mr. Appleton's narratixe: The success of the Waltham company made me desirous of ex- tending my interest in the same direction. I was of opinion that the time had arrived when the luanufacture and printing of calicoes might be successfully introduced in this country. In this opinion ]\Ir. jack- son coincided : and we set about discovering a water power. At the suggestion of Mr. Charles H. Atherton, of Amherst, New Hampshire, we met him at a fall of the Souhegan river aliout six miles fmni its entrance into the Merrimack, but the ])ower was insufficient for our ])urpose. This was in the summer of 1821. In returning we jiassed the Nashua river without lieing aware of the existence of the fall which has since been made the source of so much power by the Nashua companv. We saw a small grist mill standing in the meadow near the road, with a dam of some six or seven feet. Soon after our return I was at Waltham one day, when I was informed that Mr. Moody had lately been at Salisbury, where Mr. Worthen, his old partner, said to him : "I hear Messrs. Jackson and Appleton are looking out for water power; why don't they Inn up the Pawtucket canal? That would give them the whole jjower of the Merrimack, with a fall of thirty feet." On the strength of this, Mr. Moody had returned that way, and was satisfied with the extent of the power, and that Mr. Jack.son was making inquiries on the subject. Mr. Jackson soon after called on me, and informed me that he had had a correspondence with Mr. Clark, of Newliuryport, the Agent of the Pawtucket Company, and had ascer- tained that the stock of that company, and the lands necessary for using the water power, could lie ])urchased ; and asked me what I thought of taking hold of it. He stated that his engagements at Wal- tham would not permit him to take the management of a new concern; Init he mentioned Mr. Kirk Boott as having expressed a wish to take the management of an active manufacturing establishment, and he had confidence in his possessing the proper talent for it. .\fter a discussion THE FACTORY SYSTEM 147 it was agreed that he should consult Mr. Boott ; and that, if he should join us, we would go on with it. He went at once to see Mr. Boott, and soon returned to inform me that Mr. Boott entered heartily into the project ; and we set about making the purchases without delay. Until these were made it was necessary to confine all knowledge of the project to our own three bosoms. Mr. Clark was employed to pur- chase the necessary lands, and such shares in the canal as were within his reach ; whilst Mr. Henry Andrews was employed in purchasing up the shares owned in Boston. I recollect the first interview with Mr. Clark, at which he exhibited a rough sketch of the canal and adjoining lands, with the price which he had ascertained they could be purchased for; and he was directed to go on and comjilete the purchases, taking the deeds in his own name, in order to prevent the project taking wind prematurely. The purchases were made accordingly for our equal joint account; each of us furnishing funds as required to Mr. Boott, who kept the accounts. Formal articles of association were drawn up. The}- bear date December i, 1821 ; and are recorded in the records of the Merrimack Manufacturing Company, of which they form the germ. The six hundred shares were thus described : Kirk Boott and J. \V. lioott 180 N. Appleton 180 P. T. Jackson 180 Panl Moody 60 The Act of Incorporation of the Merrimack Manufacturing Com- pany bears date 5th of February, 1822, recognizing the original asso- ciation as the basis of the company. Our first visit to the spot was in the month of November, 1821, when a slight snow covered the ground. The party consisted of P. T. Jackson, Warren Dutton, Paul Moody, John W. Boott and myself. We perambulated the grounds and one of us retnarked that we might live to see twenty thousand people in the place. Such was the beginning of the scheme for a mill village at East Chelmsford. The original purchases on account of the town which it was planned to lay out totaled aliout four hundred acres. The aver- age price paid was about one hundred dollars an acre. That the nego- tiations caused much surprise in the neighborhood, and much wonder- ment as to what was about to happen, may be conjectured. S|)ecuIation in land for the jnirpose of selling out was soon rife. as Mr. Appleton had expected. Thomas Hurd, the manufacturer of satinets on the Concord river, after whom Hurd street was named, is described by Alfred Oilman as a "shrewd operator," who happening to be ill Boston and to overhear a conversation regarding purchase of lands at East Chelmsford, hurried home and secured the refusal of the Bowers saw mill, near Pawtucket bridge, and of considerable land in their neighborhood. The records of the Merrimack company sup- port this story, for they show that on July 29, 1822, the directors re- ceived a projjosal from Mr. Hurd in reference to a sale of land at the fall'' which t'rojxisal was referred to a committee. On August 17, 148 HISTORY OF LOWELL 1822, the Hiird holdings were Ixjught t>)- the company. In other trans- actions of the times, Mr. Hurd appears in the light of a business man with talent for making himself obnoxious for a financial purpose. Lowell, it should be observed in passing, might have been founded on the Kennebec instead of the Merrimack, had one of the Maine property owners proved as accommodating as the farmer folk about Pawtucket Falls were found out to be. It appears to be well authen- ticated that during the period of negotiations Kirk Boott made a trip from Boston to Gardiner, Maine, to bargain with R. H. Gardiner, of that place, concerning the water-power privilege belonging to his family's estate. The owner was quite willing to conclude a long lease, but not to sell his land and power. Hence Boott returned to Boston, rebus iiifi'ctis. The Founders of the City — The group of Boston capitalists who became the founders of a city which still honors their memories con- tained several quite notable personalities. Foremost among them was Francis Cabot Lowell's brother-in- law, Patrick Tracy Jackson, who after Mr. Lowell's death was the final authority in all financial arrangements. A descendant of Jonathan Jackson, an Irish merchant who settled in Newburyport, he had a business training in the East India trade, which helped to develop imagination and a spirit of enterprise in so many American youths of the early nineteenth century. His subsequent interest in the creation of New England railroads will appear in this narrative. Nathan Appleton, who frequently came forward as literary spokes- man, as well as financial factor of the early manufacturing enterprises, was of the celebrated family that came from Captain Samuel Appleton, of Ipswich, commander of the Massachusetts troops in King Philip's AVar. He liegan a college course at Dartmouth College, which he did not finish, as he had an opportimity to enter business with his brother, Samuel Appleton, of Boston. He liecame one of the heaviest investors in Lowell mill properties. He was a member of the Massachusetts Legislature between 1815 and 1827 and a member of Congress in 1830. His personal characteristics have thus been described by his friend, Robert C Winthrop: "Persistent courage and inflexible integrity were indeed the two leading characteristics of Mr. .Xjipleton's char- acter, and constituted the secrets of his good success. To these, more th;in to anything else, he owed his fortune and his fame. He displayed his Iioldness by embarking in untried enterprises, by advocating un- po])ular doctrines, by resisting popular prejudices, by confronting the most powerful and accomplished opponents in (iral and written argu- ments, and by shrinking from no controversy into which the independ- ent expression of his opinions might lead him. His integrity was manifested where all the world might read it, in the daily doings of a THE FACTORY SYSTEM 149 long mercantile career, and in the principles which he inculcated in so many forms of moral, commercial and financial discussion.'' A rather less favorable opinion of his judgment and business acumen, espe- cially in his latter years, was expressed by Dr. J. C. Ayer, of Lowell, who "muckraked" the Boston managements of Lowell mills just be- fore the Civil War. The position of town manager, to use a term that has lately come into currency, was deputed by the capitalists who planned to create this mill city at East Chelmsford to Kirk Boott, who had expressed himself as desirous of undertaking work of this kind. To this choice, fortunate, no doubt, in the main, Lowell owes many of its distinguish- ing peculiarities even to this day. The young manager who was given his tryout during the exacting first years of the town was a positive character and left his impress in many directions. He was born in Boston in 1791, but as a young boy was sent to England, where he was trained at the celebrated Rugby school. He presently returned to America and entered Harvard Col- lege, from which, however, he was not graduated. His father secured for him a commission in the British army and he entered that service in which he made a distinguished record. As a lieutenant in the Duke of York's Regiment, he witnessed the capture of San Sebastian, the battles of Nieve and the Nivelle, the passage of the Garonne and the siege of Bayonne. He probably would have risen to high rank in the royal army, but for the intervention of the War of 1812, in the course of which his regiment was ordered to America. Unwilling to fight against his fellow countrymen, young Boott resigned his British commission after five years' service. In 1817 he returned to Boston to engage in business with his brothers. Their enterprise proved unsuccessful, and at the time of the negotiations for the Pawtucket Canal and the adjacent lands, Kirk Boott, as it hap- pened, was out of employment. At this juncture he gladly accepted the tender made by Patrick Tracy Jackson to become superintendent of the new mills at East Chelmsford. To his personality, and especially to his English education and ideas, were due many of the characteris- tics of the town of which he was at the outset the virtual dictator, or "benevolent despot." Whether more credit than was his due has been given to Kirk Boott for his share in projecting Lowell is a fair subject for argument. His commanding personality to the generation immediately following made him seem to have been the major initiator of the enterprise. Toward a more moderate estimate of the part taken by the first agent of the Merrimack company, Alfred Gilman, in his sketch of the history of Lowell published in 1880, quotes John A. Lowell, of Boston, as writing: "I should be the last person to say one word in depreciation 150 HISTORY OF LOWELL of Kirk ])(jiitt. He was my bosdin friend, and I was his trustee. I would not say anything to detract from his credit; V)ut it is no more true as a matter of fact that he made the first experiment in joint stock companies in carrying on the cotton manufacturing than it is true that he went out with a fishing Hne and found that there was a water power at Chehnsford. The first person who suggested the place was Ezra Worthen. Paul Moody knew nothing about it. Mr. Moody and Mr. Jackson came up afterwards and saw the jilace. It is not true that Mr. Boott was the first to suggest it. So far from it, the whole pur- chase was made of the Pawtucket Canal, and of most of the farms here, before Mr. Boott ever had set foot on the spot." After the enter- prise was under way, however. Kirk Boott was unquestionalily for some years the principal person in the management of affairs, down to the time of his untimely death from heart failure in Merrimack street, Lowell. A likable man Kirk Bontt hardl_\' was. and various stories are told that illustrate his personal unpopularity with the populace of the com- nuuiity which he came to direct. His riding whip at very slight jirovo- cation fell upon the backs of boys whom he deemed impudent. His anglomania made trouble for him. One Fourth of July, for example, he raised both the English and the American flag on the flagpole at his residence, with the former emblem on top. An indignant crowd gathered and deiuanded that he reverse the order of the flags. This Boott refused to do, whereupnn the citizens swarmed into his yard and did it for him. Kirk Boott's negotiations with landowners of the neighborhood were regarded, whether rightly or wrongly, as rather ungenerous. A ditty is recalled of which the following were characteristic stanzas : There came a yuung man from the old countree, The Merrimack River he happened to see. What a capital place for mills, quoth he, Ri-toot, ri-noot, ri-toot, riumpty. ri-tooten-a. And then these farmers so ctite. They gave all their lands and timlicr to Boott, Ri-toot. ri-noot, etc. Under the auspices that have been noted the Merrimack Manu- facturing Co:ni)anv was duly incorporated under the laws of Massa- chusetts in 1822 with a capital stock of $600,000, and a train of events was started which almost overp.ight altered the characteristics of old Wamesit Neck. From this foundation dates the factory town as now known, a cominunitv in which thcjusands of workers are summoned daily at the same hour into workshops where each performs his task in a scheme of subdivided labor. The rural countryside in Chelmsford, Dracut and Tewksbury, re- mained, of course, for a time, much as before ; only, indeed, with the THE FACTORY SYSTEAI 151 advent of the trolley and motor car in very recent years here the sev- eral nearby "centres" became radically different from the villages which sent forth their minute-men to the Concord fight. The "city of the dinner pail," however, which was inaugurated at East Chelmsford, was distinctly a departure in American municipalities. The plans of the Boston entrepaneurs, it may be emphasized, were for a much more humane and decent industrial commvmity than any of those gathering places of the exploited classes with which the land- scape of nineteenth century England had already been fouled. As a man thinks so will he do. The New England capitalists, whatever their outlook on life, had to a far less extent than the contemporary Englishmen of business fallen under the spell of a "political economy which posited man as a naturally lazy and selfish animal who must be forced to work under the spur of grim necessity and whose ethical and altruistic sentiments, aspirations and instincts were to be ignored as negligible factors, while his greeds and dreads were constantly to be played upon, in the interest of large profits for his employer." The laissez-faire theory, in point of fact, was far more prevalent in England than in .America. In the former country, to quote again from Lin- coln's article on "The Factory System" in "The American Business Encyclopjedia," "the manufacturer took no responsibility, as a rule, for the housing of the workers allured from the country to the town by the prospect of steady work. How the masses lived and where they were buried, worn out at forty, was their own account." In contradistinction to the picture of human misery serving as a background for the profits of Lancashire manufacturers, Messrs. Jack- son, Appleton and their associates appear from the first to have had a vision of the city of neat well-clad, self-respecting operatives, reported by visitors to Lowell prior to the War of the Rebellion. It is possible, of course, somewhat to sentimentalize the favorable conditions of liv- ing in New England factory towns, of which Lowell was the proto- type. Some of the plans that were adopted for the welfare of the workers left little or no provision for human nature ; and those subse- quently went into the discard. "Corporation paternalism," writes Oneal in considering the status of the working class during this period, "became rampant. The girls not only slept in company houses, but patronized company stores. Some corporations maintained churches, paid the preacher's salary, collected pew rents from the opera- tives, and held out fixed sums from their wages for the welfare of their souls. Si.x and eight girls frequently occupied the same bed chamber, and the hours of labor varied from twelve hours in summer to fourteen hours in winter." Whatever the defects, nevertheless, of the specific plans, it re- mains true that Lowell, especially in its first years, was an exemplar 152 HISTORY OF LOWELL of the principles of "welfare work" which are now generally applied in American industry. That some of the arrangements adopted were crude may be conceded. The same criticism, indeed, still lies against many more modern efforts of the same surt. It stands at least to the credit of the men who founded Lowell that they took into their con- sideration the jjroper ui)keep of men as well as machines ; that they did not purjjose tu permit the sons and daughters of the farms who came trooping to their new town in search of work to feel that the employer had no interest whatever in them outside of working hours. It is be- ginning to be understood that the world movement toward industrial democracy, the uni\ersal class struggle which has l,)een increasingly apparent since the factory system came into being, cannot be com- pletely forefended by palliatives ; yet it is tolerably obvious that the relative freedom which Lowell has enjoyed from sanguinary clashes of interest between the representatives of capital and of labor may have been due, in large measure, to a disposition among the employers, evident from the first, to create opportunities by which the strong and ambitious worker might readily ini])r()\e his condition in life. The inauguration of this wise policy of regarding the human equa- tion, the late Governor Frederic T. Greenhalge attributed, in his ad- dress at the Lowell commemorative exercises of April i, 1886, to the founder of the initial experiment at W'altham. "If it was wise to stock a factory with the best inanimate machinery," he said, "Francis Cabot Lowell thought it wise to obtain the best human machinery, too. The welfare of the operative, mental, moral and physical, was as important in any wise man's scheme of a factory as the ten thousand horse pow-er of the river. The factory system, as then established, in this country and in England, was execrable. This was twenty years before Shaftes- bury had led public opinion to the coal pit and the factory and showed how stunted and deformed, how feeble and helpless, how ignorant and depraved, men, women and children had become under the cruel sys- tem followed by selfish employers. The factory system was looked upon as accursed, and, if the daughters of New England were to run the looms in the new enterprise, a very different system must be adopted. "And so," continued Mr. Greenhalge, "the great plan was formu- lated ; the neat, well-kept boarding house, with pleasant, home-like habits and restrictions, was established ; the church, the library and the lecture room followed: and religion, culture and refinement lent their influences to the life of toil. A new doctrine was proclaimed ; the welfare of the employed was a necessary factor to the success of the employer, just as the welfare of the employer was necessary to the success of the employed. They were one in interest, one in the loss and one in the gain ; one in prosperity and in adversity. IMilton tells THE FACTORY SYSTEM 153 us of a music so divine that it would create a soul under the ribs of death. Lowell discovered a principle that created a soul under the ribs of political eciinciniy." Excavation of Canals and Erection of Factories — Following the jnirchase of lands at East Chelmsford, and the incorporation of the Merrimack company, as related, in the spring of 1822 a force of five hundred laborers was gathered to effect an enlargement of Pawtticket canal. Somewhat more than a }ear was required for this work, which cost abottt Si20,ooo. When coinpleted the canal w^as sixty feet wide and capable of carrying eight feet of water throughout. Simultaneously a lateral canal, the present Merrimack canal, was dug from the Paw- tucket canal northward to the IMerrimack ri\-er. This latter channel furnished power for the Merrimack company's original installation. To I'-zra W'orthen, of Amesbury, who had first made the sugges- tion that the Boston capitalists should consider the water powers at Pawtucket Falls, was entrusted the superintendency of the construc- tion work of the Merrimack company's first mill, which went on pari passu with the digging of the canals. This yotmg man, whose name is perpetuated in W'orthen street, was a descendant of Ezekiel Worthen, who became one of the proprietors of the town of Amesbury in 1666. He was born at the ancestral home February 11, 1781. After learning the trade of ship carpentry he turned his attention to textile manufacture. For a time he made carding machines for a firm in Amesbury. In 181 2 he formed partnership with Paul Moody and others for making woolen goods. In 1813 this enterprise was incor- porated under the name of the Amesbury Wool and Cotton Company, with which 'Sir. W'orthen was connected until he came to East Chelms- ford in 1822. He witnessed the solid, substantial factory completed and the first return of cloth made in November, 1823. Like many others of his generation, he was a bad risk, from the viewpoint of the modern life insurance expert. "He barely lived long enough to see a great promise in his fruitful idea. He died June iS, 1824. A man of much manufacturing experience, and of great mechanical talent, his loss in the infancy of the enterprise was deeply felt." Previous experience with manufacturing on the Concord river seems to have helped in this first undertaking on a large scale to use the heretofore vmharnessed power of the Merrimack. In the con- struction of the Merrimack canal it is believed that the engineers were greatly influenced by a smaller Init generally similar hydraulic arrangement which Oliver Whipple, the powder manufacturer, had just put into successful operation on the Concord river. W'hile engaged in manufacturing at this [joint, as already stated, Mr. Whip- ple saw- the jjossibility of developing power that might be used by several mills. He accordingly constructed a canal from the head of 154 HISTORY OF LOWELL the rapids which ran nearly parallel with the river to the foot of the falls, thence taking a westerly course and discharging its water, after using, into Hale's brook. The rapids of the Concord have a total fall of about twenty-five feet, and the net result of Mr. W'hipjjle's under- taking was to provide the mill sites that were later used l)v Faulk- ner's mill, for flannel manufacture; Chase's mill, which specialized on fancy wo(_ilens, the Charles A. Stott flannel mill, yVmerican boot com- pany, lielvidere woolen company, the shuttle factory, American bunt- ing company, Naylor's carpet comjKiny, a grist mill and a worsted mill. The A\'hipple canal is understood to have been the first of its kind in this ccjuntry. Partners of the manufacturer were so skeptical about it that they insisted on consulting the eminent engineer. Colonel Loammi Ilaldwin, who at once pronounced the plans perfectly prac- tical.ile. The work of constructing this canal began in September. 1821. Aleader states that "it is not im])rol)able, in fact it is known, that this small canal had a favorable influence on the men who, the follow- ing year, examined the Pawtucket Falls with a view to establishing the immense Inisiness which [jreeminently entitled Lowell to the dis- tinctive name it bears — the City of Spindles." During this digging of the Pawtucket canal an interesting geo- logical fact came to light. It is now, apjiarently, the general belief of geologists that the Merrimack river at one time continued to flow southward, jiresumably into Boston harbor, instead of turning abruptly to the northeast as at present. Confirmation of this theory is afl^orded by a notice in the "Lowell Journal," March 10, 1826: "In digging this canal ledges were found considerably below the old canal which bore evident traces of its having once been the bed of the river. Many places were worn in the ledge, as there usually are in falls, by stones kept continually in motion." The new factory of the Merrimack company was opened on time and the first piece of cotton cloth ever made in the modern way at Lowell was woven by Deborah I^kinner, whom Paul Moody had brought from Waltham to instruct the new operatives in the care of the looms. Miss Skinner continued in the service of the Merrimack company for about five years, when she married Horace Barbour, an overseer. The family later removed to Lewiston, Maine, where Mrs. Barbour died in 1870. Some day, as the importance of the beginning is better appreciated than now, a sculptor or a mural painter may be commissioned to make a representation of Deborah Skinner at the loom. The driving force in the town planning and construction work which from 1822 onward rapidly transformed East Chelmsford, resided, of course, in the jierson of Kirk Boott. The superintendent of the new factory had come to East Chelmsford to live, watching over THE FACTORY SYSTEM 155 the erection of his own tine house on a knoll of the old Tvler place just north of Merrimack square, the house that later was moved to the head of Merrimack street to become the main building of the corporation hospital. Mr. Boott, from all accounts, was an inde- fatigable worker. He "gave his whole zeal and strength," says Miles, "to promote the prosperity of the new village and town. He watched its growth with a paternal interest, resolving here to live and die." The Earliest Corporation Boarding Houses — The system of cor- poration boarding houses, which at this writing is still existent in the life of the city, though each decade finds the residential holdings of the corporations smaller, came in with the advent of the Merrimack manufacturing company. It was foreseen that the new chances for employment would result in an influx of young people from the farms, ,and it was pur- posed to see that these should be at least as well housed as at home. According, in 1822-23, were constructed the first of the long blocks of brick boarding houses, each divided into six or eight tenements, which for years have been conspicuous on the side streets off Merri- mack and Middlesex streets. "These tenements," wrote Miles in 1845, "are finished off in a style much above the common farm houses of the country, and more nearly resemble the abodes of respectable mechanics in rural villages. They are all furnished with an abundant supply of water, and with suitable yards and outbuildings. These are constantly kept clean, the buildings well painted, and the prem- ises thoroughly whitewashed every spring at the Corporation's expense." The typical boarding house of the early period, it may be added, placed the dining-room in front, making it easy for the operative to slip in for a meal, whether going to her room or not. The kitchen was situated in the rear. There was usually a special parlor for the board- ing house keeper, customarily a widow. In some houses a sitting room was provided for the boarders. The rest of the building was given to the sleeping rooms. "In each of these," continties IMiles, "are lodged two, four, and, in some cases, six boarders; and the room has an air of neatness and comfort exceeding what most of the occu- pants have been accustomed to in their paternal homes. In many cases these rooms are not sufiiiciently large for the number who occupy them ; and sometimes that attention is not paid to their ventilation which a due regard to health demands." It must be observed, in amplification of Mr. Miles' last point, that in point of hygiene and sanitation these boarding houses could not be expected to approach modern standards of the "model tenement." They were built, with all the best intentions in the world, at a time when infectious diseases were more rife than now and when the means 156 HISTORY OF LOWELL of preventing- them were very little understood. They were, neverthe- less, much better kept up under corporation management than the same houses are now maintained in most of the cases in wliich they have come into the hands of private owners. Segregati!. .\i\iNi", h (_-HliiL(_H (Episcojial) 3. ORACK UNIVKTISALIST CHrHCH 4. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH. THE FACTORY SYSTEM 157 might be engendered it an effort were made to force their forms of worship and belief upon a population most of whom must come from communities in which the orthodox or trinitarian type of Congre- gationalism was still dominant, they appear to have listened with interest to a suggestion from Mr. Boott that a Protestant Episcopal Church be established. Nathan Appleton's narrative shows that in December, 1822, Messrs. Jackson and Boott were appointed a com,- mittee of the corporation to Isuild a suitable church for the operatives. Later it was voted that the structure should be of stone at a cost not to exceed nine thousand dollars. In pursuance of this vote the corner- stone of St. Anne's Church was laid May 20, 1824. The church society had previously been organized on February 24. 1824, as The Merrimack Religious Society. The first public serv- ices of this society were held on March 7, 1824, in the schoolhouse which the Merrimack company had built on Merrimack street, on land where the Green school now stands. The evening before these services an officiating clergyman had arrived in the person of the Rev. Theodore Edson. Thus was started the oldest church society in downtown Lowell. It is hardly accurate, of course, in view of the priority of the West Congregational Church and Society of Dracut, founded in Pawtucket- ville in 1794, to assert, as does the author of the Courier-Citizen's "Illustrated History of Lowell, Massachusetts," that .St. Anne's was the first building that was dedicated to religious worshiji within the present limits of the City of Lowell. The founding of St. Anne's Church brought to East Chelmsford one of the most famous churchmen of his day, the scholarly and beloved Rev. Theodore Edson, D. D., who was born at Bridgewater, August 24, 1793. Dr. Edson as a youth learned carpentry, but having intellectual tastes entered Phillips Academy, Andover, in 181O, and thence continued his education at Har\ard College, from which he was graduated with honors. He assumed deacon's honors and became assistant at St. Matthew's Church, South Boston, from which he was invited to come to the newly- erected St. Anne's. His distin- guished ser\'ices to the cause of popular education in Lowell and to manv other good movements will be recorded in the narrative that foUow's. The Incorporation of the Town of Lowell — The principles of political democracy, since the American Revolution, were so generally accepted that the manufacturing community at East Chelmsford could hardly have gone on for many years completely subject, both polit- ically and economically, to the irresponsible if benevolent paternalism which the rule of Mr. Boott and his associates had ushered in. The natives of the region, as has appeared in preceding chapters, had 158 HISTORY OF LOWFLL always been assertive. Practicall\- all newcomers were of the same virile and inilepeiulcnt ^'ankee stock. It was, therefore, good policy for the corporate manag-cments to submit to and even favor the self- government which was inevitable from the moment the settlement began to grow. .Mfred Oilman very cleverlv and discreetlv stated the nature of a little revolution in local afTairs which was ushered in by the incor])oration : "Up to this time (1826) the afYairs of this comiiiunit}' had been managed by the resident agents of the compa- nies. No doubt, in their view, this was their prescriptive right. These ciimpanies had done much for the welfare of the })eople gathered here; building and maintaining a church and school hiiuses, purchasing books f(_)r a library, and doing everything necessary for the religious, moral and physical wellbeing of the people. Incorporation as a town- ship brought another element to the surface ; the people found that they were themselves called u])on to participate in the management of aflairs." The governmental business of such a commiuiit}- as grew up after the Merrimack company came in could not forever be transacted at Chelmsford Centre. The records of the Merrimack Manufacturing Company show that as early as November 22, 1824, the possibility of setting off East Chelmsford as a separate township was in the minds of the directors, for on that date a committee was appointed to report on a jiossible petition for incorporation. No action was taken at that time, but the manufacturing village was increasing fast in population and wealth. It had become a hardship to have all municipal affairs deiiendent on a hamlet four miles from the mills. Accordingly, just a centurv, as it ch.mced, after W'amesit Neck was formally annexed to Chelmsford, the same district, with slightly different boundaries, was made over into a new township. The new jurisdiction did not keep its former name of East Chelmsford. Kirk lloott, who decided this as he decided many other matters, admitted to a fellow director that he had narrowed the choice of designations down to "Lowell" or "Derby." "Then let it be Lowell," was Nathan Appleton's counsel, which was followed. There are some who on sentimental grounds have always regretted that the place could not have been named W'amesit: but (jf the historical a]ipropriateness of "Lowell" as a desig- nation for an industrial centre there can be little doubt. The Town of Lowell came into existence through a legislative act of March i, 1826, whose pro\'isions should be (pioted entire: P.e it enacteil by the Senate and House (jf Representatives in General Court assembled and by the authority of the same : That the North Easterly part of the Town of Chelmsford in the County of Middlesex, lying easterly and northerly of a line drawn as follows: viz., beginning at Merrimack River at a Stone post, about THE FACTORY SYSTEM 159 two hundred rods above the mouth of Patucket Canal, so called, thence running- southerly in a straight course until it strikes the Middlesex Canal, at a point ten rods above the Canal Bridge, near the dwelling house of Henry Coburn ; thence southerly on said Canal twenty rods ; thence a due course to a stone post at Concord River ; be and hereby is incorporated into a town by the name of Lowell ; and the inhabitants of said Town of Lov^-ell are hereby invested with all the powers and privileges, and shall also be subject to the duties and requisitions of other incorj)orate towns according to the Consti- tution and Laws of this Commonwealth. Be it further enacted. That the inhaljitants of said Town of Lowell shall be holden to pay all arrears of taxes which have been assessed upon them i)y the Town of Chelmsford before the passage of this act, and the said Town of Lowell shall be holden to pay two- fifths parts of the balance or residue of all debts due and owing from said Town of Chelmsford on the first day of ^Lirch one thousand eight hundred and twenty-six, after deducting- therefrom the sum of twenty- seven hundred and twenty-six dollars, and after applying to the pay- ments of said debt all the money belonging to said Town and all the taxes assessed by said Town of Chelmsford before the passing of this act. Be it further enacted. That the said Towns of Chelmsford and Lowell shall hereafter be liable for the support of all persons who do or hereafter shall stand in need of relief, as paupers whose settle- ment was gained or derived from a settlement gained or derived within their respective limits ; and in all cases hereafter wherein the settlement of a Pauper was gained or derived before the passing of this act, partly within the limits of both of said Towns, or so herein it shall not be proved within the limits of which of said towns such set- tlement was gained, the said Towns of Chelmsford and Lowell shall Ije equally lial)le for the support of said paupers. Re it further enacted. That until a new \-aluation is taken by the Commonwealth the .State and County taxes and any reimbursements required by the Commonwealth for the payment of the Representa- tive of the present and past years of said Town of Chelmsford, which may be called for from said Towns of Chelmsford and Lowell, shall be paid jointly by said Towns, and in the proportion of three-fifths for said Chelmsford and two-fifths for said Town of Lowell. Be it further enacted. That any Justice of the Peace in the County of Middlesex be and hereby is authorized to issue his war- rant to any principal inhabitant of the Town of Lowell, requiring him to notify and warn the inhabitants of said Town of Lowell to assemble and meet at some convenient time and place in said Town to choose all such officers as Towns are required to choose in the months of March and April, and to do and transact any other lawful business relative to the alTairs of said Town. In the House of Representatives, March ist, 1826. This Bill having had three several readings passed to be enacted. TiMOTHv Fuller, Speaker. In Senate, March i, i8j'>. This Bill having had two several readings passed ti> be enacted. i\'.\th'l Silsisek, President. i6o HISTORY OF LOWELL March ist, 1826. Approved: Levi Lixcoln. A true copy. Attest: Edward D. Bangs, Secretary. A true Copy from original. Attest : Saml'KI. a. ConURN, Town Clerk. Without delay the citizens of East Chelmsford availed themselves of the provisons of the new incorporation. A warrant was issued on March 2, 1826, by Joseph Locke, a justice of the peace, instructing Kirk Boott to call a meeting of qualified voters to take action in the matter of establishing a town government. Mr. Boott, having received the warrant, called the meeting at the Old Stone House, now the Ayer Home for Children, of which Samuel Adams Coburn, the first town clerk, was one of the pnjprietors. Thus was inaugurated a town government which continued for ten years. The first selectmen, chosen under the act of incorporation, were Na- thaniel Wright, Samuel Batchelder and C)liver M. W'hij.jple. Of these earliest town fathers, Mr. Whipple, manufacturer of powder and designer of the Concord river canal, has already been encle in all sections nf the continent. When Lowell, in lirief, was practically the only town of its kind in North America, it naturally secured the very pick of aspiring young manhood. To-day youths of similar ability to these forefathers of the city still may choose to settle in Lowell in preference to some one of a score of other New England cities of the same type, or again, they may, as so often happens, turn to (Uie nf the newer and presumably more progressive industrial centres of the West or South. An opinion is sometimes expressed to the effect that Lowell in its first years was a more stimulating place to live in than it is to-day. The impression is perhaps not altogether unfounded. Yet it would be unsafe to draw from it the familiar pessimistic conclusion that the Nation and the race have somehow degenerated since 1N30. The conditions were very exceptional which brought to Lowell the grandfathers and grand- mothers of so many of the solidcst families of the city of this century. The youthfulness of the new Lowell may well be emphasized. It was in truth a boys' town that rose on the streets carefully laid out over the old Tyler and Fletcher farms. One is impressed by the fact that atent in 1846. Little, however, did he appreciate the value of his invention ; for he offered to sell his patent for the sum of .'R500 — a patent from which he afterward realized half a million dollars in a single year. He died October 3, 1867, at Brooklyn, New York." From Marlboro an arrival was that of Wesley Sawyer (1810- 1879), son of a satinet manufacturer of that place, who in 1824 secured employment in the Howe mill, in Belvidere and at nineteen became its superintendent — a man of most extraordinary mechanical genius. It was later said of him,: "It always seemed to me that wherever Wesley Sawyer went there was sure to be a turning over of the machinery of the mill. He was a born mechanic, and could not only see the necessity of a machine to do what was done by hand, Init could produce the machine or mechanism necessary to do it." One of his first inventions was a wire heddle for loom harnesses, taking the place of the former hand knit harnesses, made by women of families living near the mill. His subsequent inventions included the familiar shawl fringer, which knots the fringes of shawls and toweling (an operation formerly performed by hand) and a machine for woven wire netting which was the basic asset of the Lowell Wire Fence Company, of which Mr. Sawyer afterwards became president. The value of the training in Lowell workshops in these first years of the new city was such that surprisingly many of the distin- guished manufacturers of other New England cities had their first practical education in the Spindle City. Of such sort was Jonathan Sawyer, who for many years made the finest grade of cassimeres known to the American textile trade. Mr. Sawyer was born at Marlboro in 1S17 and was brought at the age of twelve by his widowed mother to Lowell. He was a member of the first class of the Lowell High School, having General Benjamin F. Butler as one of his classmates. He entered Wesleyan Univer- sity, Middletown, Connecticut, but remained for only two terms when he went to work as a dyer in Lowell. He learned the busi- THE FACTORY SYSTEAF 177 ness thorougflily and later became a large manufacturer on his own account at Dover, New Hampshire. The Sawyer cassimeres and suitings were [jremiated at the Philadelphia Exposition in 1876. Mr. Sawyer was a notable figure in his day, an active anti-slaverv man and very independent commercially, even to the point of always making direct sales of his product instead of selling through commission houses. Only in early life was he identified with Lowell. .\braham Howe (1789-1861) was a Marlboro man who came to Lowell to li\ e before it was incorporated as a city and whose inven- tions included the revolving shuttle-box for looms, the tenon bit and the whip or belt saw. His son, Edward B. Howe, became a notable manufacturer of cards in Lowell. James Dugdale, a mechanic from Lancashire, England, was one of the first of the many Lowell inventors who have furthered the textile industry. He came in 1825 as overseer on the Alerrimack and soon thereafter devised the "dead spindle,'' which revolutionized methods of spinning coarse yarns. William \\'. Calvert, who reached Lowell in 1825, was an inge- nious inventor, as was his even more distinguished brother, Erancis Calvert, tn whom the textile industry owes the burring machine, the comber and the cotton willow. Erancis Calvert also introduced the first worsted spinning machinery into Lowell. George Wellman ( 1810-1864) was still another inventor of tex- tile machinery who settled here before the incorporation. He was made foreman of a carding room, on the Merrimack in 1835, in which position he began a series of inventions that included the stoj) motion employed on the dressing frame and winder, a self top card stripper and other very important devices. Much of the substantial building of the oldest parts of Lowell was due to the conscientious work of Humphrey Webster ( 1781- 1S471. a cousin of Daniel Webster, who was born at Boscawen but resided as a youth at Newburyport before he came to East Chelmsford as a builder and carpenter. This typical business man of his day erected the Ijuildings of the Merrimack Print works, including the famous "Jiihn Bull's Row," occupied by calico ]irinters and engravers who had been brought hither from England. The Hamilton corpora- tion block on Central street just south of the canal bridge is his. He built the agents' houses of the Appleton corporation and the Lowell Machine shop, and the large blocks of houses owned by the Boott and Tremont corporations. His row of cottage houses on Merrimack street between Kirk and John has now disajjpeared. He did the carpentry on the old town hall, built in 1828-29. He was in ])art responsih'p for the construction of Central bridge, of which he had L— 12 1/8 HISTORY OF LOWl-.LL charge from the opening down tn his death. lie is said to have empl(}\e(l an average of 50 ti> do men whose hours nf wurk in summer were thirteen, beginning at five o'clock, with lialf an hour out for Ijreakfast at seven, then to noon and half an hour for dinner, and so on to seven o'clock. Air. \^^ebster at first lived on the Merrimack cor])0- ration. Later he moved over to Christian hill, wlu-re the Webster mansion is still one of the landmarks. A man of very interesting personality, Mr. Webster took especial pride in the achievements of his distinguished kinsman who always looked in on him when he came to Lowell. Of his business habits it is said that he balanced his books each night with every individual l:i\- whom he was employed, for it was one of his princijjles to have no debts. He was notably abstemious in his habits of eating and drinking. A New Hampshire youth, founder of a good Lowell family, was Stejjhen Mansur ( i jyy- 1 CS63 ) , who was born at Temple and who, as a result of youthful em])loyment on the Erie canal, came to Lowell in 1822 to act as superintendent of the job of widening the oUl canal between the guard locks and the machine shop. He was at this time proprietor of a hotel in Bostc.m, a position which he did not relinquish until 1830, when he Ijecamc a resident of Lowell for good and all. engaging in the hardware and housefurnishing business and serving the community in many useful capacities. He was an assessor under the town government and a recognized ex])ert in real estate values. From Fayette, Maine, in 1828, arrived Edward Tucke, descended from Roliert Tucke, surgeon, who in 1638 settled at Hampton, New Hampshire. Mr. Tucke entered the employ of Samuel .\. Coburn. then proprietor of the Old Stone House, whose sister he married. He later founded the first express business between Lowell and Boston. From Portsmouth was J()siah Greenough Peabody, descended from Lieutenant Francis Peabody, one of the original settlers of Hamjiton. In 1824 he began learning the builder's trade at Fast Chelmsford with John llassett. In 1832 he was employed upon the Merrimack House and on Central lUock, the first four-story building in the town. Later contracts, when he was in business for himself, were the Savings Bank building on Shattuck street, the Kirk and Lee street churches; two mills for tlie I'loott corporation and two for the Massachusetts corporation ; the Varnum school house, and many structures outside Lowell. Old-Time Merchants of Lowell — Growth of mercantile businesses was ;i natural c inse(|uence of the incoming of a new and fairly well jiaid po])ulation to luist Chelmsford. At the time Kirk Boott nego- tiated with the liical farmers for their lands there was but one store in the present territory of Lowell south of the Merrimack and east of THE FACTORY SYSTEM ijg Black brook. This was the general trading establishment of Captain Phineas Whiting at the corner ot Pawtucket and School streets, where the Frederick Aver mansion was built later. Soon after the Merrimack ComiJauy began operations, a second store was started just over the Concord in Belvidere. Thereafter, as was but natural, the number of traders increased rapidly and there was soon a considerable differentiation of establishments, suc- ceeding the countr)- stores of which Captain \\'hiting's place was typical. Not all the new ventures were successful, and it is recorded that Lowell got rather a bad reputation with credit men in the thirties because so many ad\enturers came in and tried to start business with "a shoe string" as capital. Others succeeded and laid the founda- tions for some of the solidest fortunes in the city of to-day. The suc- cessful merchant in Lnwell has always held an enviable social position, and every incentive has been offered to young men of the finest type to engage in trade. The late Charles Ho\'ey, in a paper read before the Old Residents' Association in i8So, listed the traders who con- ducted shops in Lowell between 1822 and 1832 as follows: Phineas \\"hiting. H. & W. Spalding, Alpheus Smith, John Richardson, War- ren Dyar, Jacob Robbins, George H. Carleton, Horace Howard, Ro- land Lyman, Meacham & Matthewson, \\"illiam W'. Wyman, Samuel L. \\"ilkins, Paul H. ^^"illard, William Davidson, Aaron H. Safford, Mansur, Child &: Company, Ransom Reed, Hazen Elliott. Henry J. Baxter, William S. Bennett, Daniel Sanderson, Whidden & Russell, Wentwnrth & Raynes. John T. Pratt. H. W. Hastings, Charles H. Sheafe, John Putney, Joel Stone, Thomas Flint, Thomas Billings, Atherton 8z Buttrick, Frye & .Abbott, James K. Fellows, William Bas- com. Perez Fuller, L^. S. & T. P. Saunders, James Tyler, Paul R. George. Philip T. \\'hite, Daniel E. Knight, S. & T. P. Goodhue, Charles Sanderson, Jonathan Kendall, Edward Sherman, Mathias Parkhurst, J. L. Foote, Luther Richardson, William C. Gray, Dennis Fay, E. B. Patch, Charles Green. The first Lowell directory was printed by Thomas Billings in 1832. It contains the names of thirty-two traders. Among the occu- pations are some called bv name? that are now obsolete, such as "cord- wainer" and "yeoman." The many young men of mechanical and executive ability who. like those just mentioned, were brought to Lowell by the new ojipor- tunities were but a handful, of course, as com]jared with the host of young women whom the mills called from country hoines. Hundreds of men and women of the present generation are proud of grand- mothers who got their start in life through working in the factories. If in later decades a foolish stigma was sometimes attached to labor at the loom and spinning frame, such a condition was due to the un- i8o HISTORY OF LOWELL fortunate spirit of caste that was increased when people from overseas began to throng the mills. While social distinctions existed most decidedly in the town of Lowell as everywhere else in the quondam British colonies, these were not of a sort to be insurmountable bar- riers. Genesis of the Lowell Factory Workers — No better description of the kind of young women who came to Lowell from the nearby town- ships, from New Hampshire, \'ermont and Maine, has been written than that in Harriet H. Roliinson's "Loom and Spindle:" In Lowell, at first only a few came ; others followed, and in a short time the prejudice against factory labor wore away, and the Lowell mills became filled with blooming and energetic New England women. They were naturally intelligent, had mother wit, and they fell easily into the ways of their new life. * * * Some were not over ten years old, a few were in middle life, but the majority were between the ages of sixteen and twenty-five. The very young girls were called "doffers." They doffed or took off the full bobbins from the spinning frames and replaced them with empty ones. These mites worked about fifteen minutes every hour and the rest of their time was their own. When the overseer was kind they were allowed to read, knit, or go outside the mill yard to play. They were paid two dollars a week. The work- ing hours of all the girls extended from five o'clock in the morning until seven in the evening, with one-half hour each for breakfast and dinner. Even the doft'ers were forced to be on duty nearly fourteen hours a day. Those of the mill girls who had homes generally worked from eight to ten months in the j'ear ; the rest of the time was spent with parents or friends. A few taught school during the summer months. Their life in the factory was made pleasant for them. In those days there was no need of advocating the proper relationship between employer and employed. Help was too valuable to be ill- treated. One is impressed in reading between the lines of such accounts as this, with the possibility that this "golden age" may have had its tar- nished aspects. Relatively light as the work undoubtedly was, for the present-day speeding-uj) processes had not then been conceived by factory managers innocent of "efficiency," the long hours, seemingly, must have produced superabundant fatigue in many of the operatives, and the eft'ect of the toxins thus caused was the same in 1826 as in 1918. Child labor, again, is child labor, and it denies the right of nor- mal childhood to unfettered play and frequent changes of occupation, even if it is so conducted that the children doft' l)ol)bins only once an hour during a fourteen-hour day. We shall later find the Rev. Henry ,A. Miles engaged in a defence of, which was tantamount to an apology for, the very long hours which women and children were obliged to labor in the Lowell mills prior to 1845. There is also an intimation that the democracy of the time was not very far-reaching in Mrs. Rob- THE FACTORY SYSTEM i8i inson's statement that "the most favored of the girls were sometimes invited to the houses of the dignitaries of the mills, and thus the line of social division was not rigidly maintained." The conditions of employment, nevertheless, were unquestionably better during the township era of Lowell history, from the point of view of the welfare of the employed, than they became after the influx of several different races had broken up the first homegeneousness of the populatiiin. Early Real Estate Developments — Merrimack and Central streets were laid out in their present directions and dimensions about 1822. The triangular tract at the head of Central street was sold by the Locks and Canals Company to Patrick Tracy Jackson, of Boston, who paid for it what was then regarded as the extravagant price of thir- teen cents a foot. By a few of the more foreseeing, however, it was appreciated that this location, directly across the street from Carter's Tavern, later the Washington House, would always be of commanding commercial importance. Here subsequently W'illiam Livingston erected a business building which was so magnificent in its appoint- ments that many predicted financial loss from it. In this, however, they were mistaken. The ground floor of the building was occupied by Mr. Tower with his very successful dry goods store, and thus arose the name of Tower's corner, by which the junction point of the several streets that "fan" into Central street is now known. In 1873 an in- effectual attempt was made to remove the Livingston building and to create in its place a public square. The residential districts of the town were mostly very close to the mills in the era of long hours and no street car facilities. The streets between Lowell (now Salem) street and the present Little Canada were well occupied before 1836, and there was a good popula- tion between Thorndike street and the Concord river. The present development of the Highlands was hardly thought of and even School street hill was not yet divided by streets. The "court end" of the town, to which Kirk Boott removed his fine residence (now the Cor- poration Hospital) when the land on the old Tyler farm was wanted for other purposes, was along Pawtucket street, where several of the oldest families had good houses before the founders of Lowell came in. One of the strong arguments in favor of this section for exclusive resi- dences was to the effect that on account of the prevailing west and northwest wind it got very little of the smoke from factory chimneys. A rival residential district to Pawtucket street began to be cre- ated across the Concord river from about 1830 onward. The somewhat baronial "Old Yellow House" that could be seen amidst its poplars from the site of Kirk Boott's mansion on the former Tyler farm has been mentioned. It stood on land which in 1691 had i82 HISTORY OF LOWELL been deeded by Adam Wiiithr(ip to Samuel Himt. 'l"he house in 1816 liad lieen bou,t;ht by Judge Livermore as an ideal country jdace. That it was such is well attested by reminiscences of his daug-hter, Mrs. Josiah G. Abbott. "The house was delightfully situated at the conflu- ence of the Merrimack and Concord rivers," she wrote. "Standing at an elevation of 40 feet above the water it commanded a distinct and lovely view of both the streams. Back of the heights, on the opposite side of the Merrimack, rose Dr.'icut Heights, as if to shield the spot from the north winds. It was certainly a lovely old mansion." Here for a number of years Judge Livermore lived in retirement after an active career in which, as jurist and member of Congress, he emulated the services of his father, also Judge Livermore, of the New Hamp- shire Supreme Court. He died ir. 1S32 at the age of seventy. The first i)r(Tprietor of "Eeh iderc" was. in fact, an interesting per- sonage. Edward St. Loe Livermore, a descendant of John Livertnore, one of the first settlers of Watertown, was a son of Chief Justice Sam- uel Livermore, of the New Hampshire Supreme Court. His father (1732-1803) married Jane, daughter of the Rev. Arthur Browne, the first Episcopal minister settled in New Hampshire. In 1765 he began the settlement of Holderness, Grafton county, where on the Pemigewasset river he built the huge mansion that sulisequently liecame the Epis- copal Seminary for the diocese of New Hampshire. He was a repre- sentative in the first National Congress and a member of the LTnited States Senate for nine years, during a portion of wdnich time he was President pro tcuiporc. His son Edward, who was born at Portsmouth in 1762, had his early education at Londonderry and Holderness, with the Rev. Robert Eowle as his principal tutor. He studied law at New- buryport with Chief Justice Parsons and began his practice at Con- cord, New Hampshire. Soon after the death of his first wife, who was Mehitable Harris, Mr. Livermore removed to Portsmouth. Eor several years, by appointment of President Washington, he was Lhiited States District .-\ttorney. In 1798 he Iriecame justice of the Supreme Court of New Hampshire. In 1799 he married Sarah Crease, daughter of William Stackpole. merchant of Boston, still remembered by older residents of Lowell, where she died in 1859. Her name is perpetuated in Stackpole street. In politics Judge Livermore was a Eederalist. ^^'hen in 1802 he moved to Ncwburyport, that centre of Eederalism at once elected him State Senator. "His course there was so wise and judicious," his daughter wrote, "that he was chosen to represent the North Essex District, then so-called, in Congress." In 1807 he actively opposed President Jefferson's Embargo Act. He retired from Congress in 181 1 and moved his residence tc; Boston, where he was out of public affairs for several years. His attitude to the War of 1812 was that of THE FACTORY SYSTEAF 183 many leading New England Federalists, one of intense hostility. Shortly after the war, Judge Livermore and his family went to Zanes- ville, Ohio, intending to settle there. The discomforts of what was then a pioneer settlement proved too much for them and they soon returned to Boston. The desire for a peaceful country life was strong in Judge Livermore, nevertheless, and led to his buying the Old Yel- low House, in Tewksbury, in 181 6. That good society was the rule at the Old Yellow House may be judged from the daughter's description of her father's habits of living: "For many years Judge Livermore had associated with men prominent in letters and in politics, in this and other countries, and had taken an active part in the political transactions of the times, so that, being endowed with a comprehensive memory, he had at his command a large fund of anecdotes, and his conversation was agreeable and instructive to all with whom he came into contact. When he bought the Gedney estate in Tewksbury he called it 'Belvidere,' a most appro- priate name for so beautiful a place. Lentil 1826 the nearest place of ])ublic worship was about two miles from 'Belvidere,' at Pawtucket Falls, where the Rev. Mr. Sears, a Presbyterian minister, preached for many years, and here the Livermore family became constant attend- ants.'' After the opening of St. Anne's the Li\'ermore family natvirally transferred their affiliation to a church that was not only near at hand, but of their inherited choice. At the first meeting of the new parish a pew was placed at the disposal of Judge Livermore. This was occu- pied, down to comparatively recent days, by Miss Elizabeth Browne Livermore. "Judge Livermore li\-ed to see a large and flourishing city grow up around the lonely spot he had selected for a quiet home, and to gather round his fireside neighbors who would have graced society in any city of the world. He died at 'Belvidere' on the 15th of Septem- ber, 1832. at the age of seventy years, and was buried in the old Gran- ary Burying Ground in Boston. He left seven children by his second marriage, four of whom are still living, t'/.?., Elizabeth Browne Liver- more, who lives at Lowell and is unmarried ; Caroline, the wife of Hon. J. G Abbott, of Boston ; Sarah Stackpole, wife of John Tatter- son, Esq., of Southbridge, Mass. ; and Mary Jane, wife of Hon. Daniel Saunders, of Lawrence." The Nesmiths, Developers of Belvidere — .After Judge Livermore's death, Belvidere was sold to John and Thomas Nesmith for about $25,000. These brothers were descended from Deacon James Nesmith, who settled in Londonderry in 17 19 and who was an elder in the Pres- byterian church. His eldest son, Thomas, moved over into the adjoin- ing town of Windham, where he acquired a large estate. His grand- i84 HISTORY OF LOWELL sons, just named, were Jnhii and Thunias, f(junders of families which have had a great share in the upgrowth of Lowell. John Nesmith, born in Windham, August 3, 1793, was, in especial, a man of large affairs. As a youth he rose to prominence, serving as treasurer of his native town in 1819-20 and as its representative in the New Hamp- shire Legislature in 1821. In 1821 he and his brother Thomas engaged in manufacturing at Derry. They also made a venture in New York, where they started an extensive and remunerati\e business. In 1S31 they came to Lowell. Arrived in Belvidere the Ncsmiths in far-sighted fashion laid out the scheme of streets which now covers the finest residential quarter of the city, retaining ample locations for their own noble residences, still standing. Previous to this developmental work, it should be noted, Belvidere had never been highly esteemed as a place for select residences. It had, however, all through the town period, an up and coming popula- tion, some of the members of which gave no end of trouble to the sedate farmers of Tewksbury. For five or six years there was an ever-increasing demand on the part of Belvidere for annexation to the town of Lowell, in which most ot the bread-winners worked and where their real interests lay. Their demand was at first resisted by Tewks- Iniry, whose citizens viewed with alarm the loss of much of their taxa- ble property. Militant methods of protest, however, finally won over the town to a policy of letting the turbulent village go in peace. "We used," wrote George Hedrick, years afterwards, "to charter all the teams, hay carts and other kind of vehicles and go down [to town meeting at Tewksbury Centre] and disturb the people of the town by our boisterous actions. As we neared the village a 'hurrah' gave the warning of our approach. We took extra ]iains to ha\'e a full turnout, make all the trouble we could, and have, for a day in the year, a great time. At twelve o'clock we adjourned to Brown's tavern for dinner, and hot flij) and other favorite beverages of those days were freely par- taken of. We met again at two o'clock and kept up the turbulent pro- ceedings until seven, and returned well satisfied with our endeavors for the good of the town." On one occasion, Mr. Hedrick recalled, the "rough element" suc- ceeded in passing a resolution to the effect that the next Tewksbury town meeting shuuld be held in Belvidere. This was too much. The townsmen finally cajiitulated and consented to the annexation, which became effective May 29, 1834. How the growth of the new manufacturing town affected the quiet rural neighborhood opposite the confluence of the rivers was described with not a little literary charm in 1891 by "M. W.," who wrote on "Old Dracut" for a booklet called "Our Home'' and published in aid of the Home for Young Women and Children. THE FACTORY SYSTEM 185 Of Christian Hill, formerly "Dracut Heights," the author said: One whose childish memories commenced before the century had completed its fortieth birthday has in her mind a fair picture of a gracefully shaded country winding over a wooded hill upon the crest of which was a noble pine tree, a landmark for miles around. This hill, where our city now stores her pellucid and healthgiving waters, was intersected with many grassy paths and shaded wood roads through which Sarah, Helen and I wandered all the summer days. * * * Below lay the sparsely settled village of Centralville, then a part of Dracut, and a mere cluster of houses. On the hillside were as many, perhaps, as could be counted on the two hands. There were a few good old homesteads with fine trees about them, a tvpical country store, a public house and an academy. But the village road led to Lowell, that wonderful town across the river that had sprung into busy life under the eyes of the old settlers of Dracut, while they were blinking at it with astonishment; and be- tween them and it hung the covered wooden bridge of the period, dark and gloomy, and full of suggestions of a "foul and bloody deeds." It was the ugliest structure that ever connected shore with shore, and through it the village maiden, stranded in the twilight, hurried fear- fully, with throbliing heart and many an anxious backward look. At the Dracut end of the liridge was the toll house, small and prosaic, but full of sunshine. It was a place of more than common interest and had a distinct individuality. It was the spot where a choice bit of news or gossip, flying through the air, was sure to lodge. The Lowell paper would always be read there, and "lost, strayed or stolen" posted. The development of the suburb of Centralville as a district of Dracut began while Lowell was still a township. Two men were especially responsible for foreseeing the residential possibilities of Christian Hill and the adjacent low lands. Joseph Bradley was of the old Haverhill family which had settled on the Dracut side of the river to operate the ferry that long went by their name. His son-in-law was Benjamin Franklin Varnum, one of the sons of Major-General Joseph Bradley Varnum. These gentlemen inaugurated the first petition to the General Court for a bridge, and, when the requested corporation was sanctioned in 1825, Mr. Bradley was elected its president and Mr. Varnum its clerk. A little later the Varnum residence was started on what was then known as Dracut Heights with grounds of unusual pretension for the place and time. The locality became known as Centralville, to distinguish it from other and supposedly more outlying parts of the town of Dracut. To the initiative of these two men was due the project of an acad- emy on Christian Hill, together with a large boarding house for stu- dents. This educational institution was incorporated under the style of Centralville Academy. The schoolhouse was on the site now occu- pied by the Varnum school, which was given its name in honor of this i86 HISTORY OF LOWELL son of Speaker Varnuni, and not, as has often been stated, of the Speaker himself. Politics in the Town Period — The political as well as the indus- trial growth of the new communit}- was rapid in the period between the two incorporations. The time was one in which men took their politics very' seriously, in which respect Lowell was not exceptional. The first Congressional election in which Lowell citizens cast votes was that of November 6, 1826. Edward Everett, Whig, was chosen over John Keyes, Democrat. This distinguished orator, some time president of Harvard College, continued to represent Lowell at W'ashington down to 1830, when a new arrangement of Congressional districts separated the northern from the southern towns of Middlesex county. Everett's successor was Gayton F. Osgood, of Andover, a Democrat. He was followed, in 1S35, by Caleb Cushing, who was elected "after a contest," accordmg to Cowley, "rarely equalled in the annals of party strife." Mr. Cushing continued to represent the Lowell district until 1843. He subsequently became a justice of the Supreme Court, Attorney-General of the Linited States, and president of the Charleston Convention of i860. The political complection of the town of Lowell is indicated by the presidential votes of three successive elections: 1828 — Jackson, Democratic, 97 ; Adams. Federal, 278. 1832 — Jackson, Democratic, 412; Clay, Whig, 694. 1836 — Van Buren, Democratic, 894: \\'ebster, Whig, 878. Local political complications were occasionally of an exciting nature. All that was best in the town meeting system undoubtedly came uppermost before a city government was inaugurated. While politics was then a game, it had not. to any alarming extent, become a graft. Men of the highest character were chosen, usually, to direct town affairs. The annual meetings had their lively discussions, their wholesome ebullitions of democratic spirit ; but public business was not hindered by them. Considering the resources of the community the ajjpropriations for support of the local public institutions were generally liberal. Until 1824 there was no post office at East Chelmsford. In that year Jonathan C. Merrill was installed as first postmaster. He was a merchant whose post office business, the salary varying according to the receipts from $80 to $362, was necessarily subordinate to the con- duct of his store on Tilden street, near Merrimack. He was succeeded in 1829 by Captain William W. Wyman. appointed !>y President Jack- son. Captain Wyman. who down to his death in 1864 was one of the citv's prominent citizens, had a salary varying from $625 to $1,000. His office was at first on Central street and later in the city govern- ment building at Merrimack and John streets. In 1833 President Jack- THE FACTORY SYSTEM 187 son appointed to the postmastership. the Rev. EHphalet Case, a staunch Democrat, who later removed to Ohio. With A. C. Bagley, also a Lowell man, he settled in Cincinnati, where he engaged in the pub- lishing business. He was for some years editor and part owner of the "Enquirer." About the beginning of the Civil War he removed to Portland, Maine, and bought the "Advertiser." He died December 15, 1862, aged sixty-six years. In some reminiscences contributed by Hon. J. G. Peabody to the "Courier Citizen" histor}- of 1S97, it is stated that he "finally went to Indiana, engaged in farming and died there." This statement of Mr. Peabody's, evidently made from memor}-, must have been erroneous, as the "Lowell Citizen" published an obituary, rather lengthv and circumstantial for the time, on December 18, 1862. CHAPTER VIII. An Era of Improvement. Commencement of the Lowell School System — It was characteris- tic nf the temper of the community that the institutions of public edu- cation were exceptionally well started in the first decade of municipal existence. Provisions for schooling had not figured so very heavily in the budgets of the towns out of which the territory of Lowell was taken. One of the first schoolmasters, a worthy predecessor of many who have served the community in this essential capacity, was Joel Lewis, born at Canton in iSoo. When th.e Merrimack company in 1824 opened its school on the site of the Green school, this yoimg man was em- ployed as teacher. He had had experience already, having begun to teach at Braintree as a boy of eighteen. In 1822 he became an assist- ant in Warren Colburn's Boston school and thus jiresumably came tmder consideration for the position at East Chelmsford. Besides being an excellent pedagogue Mr. Lewis was, like his friend, the resi- dent agent of the Merrimack company, an enthusiastic student of astronomy. "Many a night when the lazy world was locked in sleep," says Joshua Merrill in his "Reminiscences of Joel Lewis," "Mr. Col- burn and he were engaged in their favorite occupation of observing the stars." Mr. Lewis did not teach for long, resigning to enter the em- ploy of the Locks and Canals Company. He was one of the founders of the Middlesex Mechanics' Association, in which he took great inter- est. He died November 11, 1834. His friend, W^arren Colburn, died in September 13, 1834. These two men, with Dr. Edson, share the credit for the establishment of a modern public school system in Lowell. This tribute was paid to Mr. Lewis: "Rarely has it hap- pened to anyone, by a spirit of the truest benevolence, by peculiar charms of social intercourse, and a manifestation of true high moral worth, to leave a deeper impress, not only on the minds of near friends by whom he was belo\ed, but in those wider circles in which he had his walk in life." The beginnings of the pulilic school system date, in reality, from the first Lowell town meeting, that of March 6, 1826. Oliver M. Whip- ple, Warren Colburn, Henry Colnirn. Jr., Nathaniel W^right and John Fisher were then appointed a committee to ]>lan for a division of the town into school and highway districts. At the meeting of April 3 following their report was accepted. It provided for creating five school districts with school houses at the following locations: No. i, site of the present Green school ; No. 2, at the corner of Pawtucket ^^^ -r / y irf»fMiM«|t»^^n i. l-Vv. i^ ^-> W^;:; mm 5 ^^K ^^V=,^ I^S <: y. S AN ERA OF IMPRO\"EMENT iSy and Salem streets, on the grounds now occupied by the Corporation Hospital ; No. 3, near the pound ; No. 4, near Hale's mills ; No. 5, on Central street, just south of Hurd street. The committee appointed to take charge of these educational facilities was: Theodore Edson, ^\'arren Colburn, Samuel Batchelder, John O. Green, Elisha Hunting- ton. The town's first appropriation on account of the schools was $ 1 ,000. So many of the operatives were young unmarried people that the schools, it may be assumed, did not at first have quota of pupils pro- portionate to the population. "One of the districts. No. 3," Dr. Edson recalls, "was very small, not containing more than about 16 pupils. In 1825, the year previous to the incorporation of Lowell, the town of Chelmsford appropriated for schools in this whole region, which was reckoned one district, the sum of $113.50." In March, 1827, the number of pupils in the Central street district had grown so fast that district No. 6 on the east side of the street was created. Reminiscences of the teaching at the school house which, as before stated, stood at the head of Salem street, near where the Cor- poration Hospital now is. were contributed in May, 1892, at a meeting of the Old Residents' Historical Association by the Rev. V^arnum Lin- coln, who said: "The school lasted for six or eight weeks in summer and ten or twelve weeks in winter. When I began to go there it was taught by a man named Byam. After this Jefferson Coburn taught the school in winter. In summer he tended bar for his brother, who o\\ned the ^lerrimack House. Such a mixing of vocations would hardly be tolerated now, but Mr. Coburn didn't instill the same kind of spirits into his pupils that he did into his customers, and was alto- gether one of the best teachers I ever knew." This dispenser of knowledge and toddy whom Mr. Lincoln thus commended, it may be added, became later the proprietor, successively, of the Franklin House, Lawrence, the Rockingham House. Portsmouth, and the East- ern Exchange. Boston. He died at Lowell in 1871. Some recollections of an early schoolmaster. In- Joshua N. Mer- rill, read before the Old Residents' Historical Association, give essen- tial facts of school history of Lowell before the district system was abolished : I went to see the school house where I was to labor for three months, wrote Mr. Merrill. It was a neat little building, standing at the corner of Middlesex and Eliot streets. It had formerly been the Hamilton counting room. Some thirty years ago. when the brick school house was to be erected on the same location, it was removed to the back part of the school vard. After remaining there several years, occupied by a primary school, it was sold and moved on to the 190 HISTORY OF LOWELL lot next east of the engine house on Middlesex street. An addition has been made to it, and a brick basement, but the outlines of what was the first counting room of the Hamilton Manufacturing Company, the first school house in Lowell, are plainly to be seen. On Monday, November 5, I commenced my school, with about seventy-five scholars, whose ages ranged from three to twenty years. The second day I received a formal visit from the superintending com- mittee, which in i(S27 consisted of Theodore Edson, Warren Colburn and John O. Swan. During the winter a very serious difficulty originated between the su{)erintending and prudential committees in several of the school dis- tricts in regard to the books required to be used in the schools: but fortunately my school was not disturbed in the least. * * * At the close of the three nnnUhs the committee examined the school and expressed their satisfaction with the progress. The town apjjropriatinn for the schools in 1827 was $1,000: of this sum $120 was allotted to this district. More than that had been ex- pended, the balance being paid by the Hamilton company. A new engagement was nov/ made, as follows: "By order of the Agent of the Hamilton Company, agreed with Joshua Merrill, to teach the school eight weeks, commencing Feb. 4, 182S, for fifty-two dollars including his board. Agreed to keep five and a half days in a week. Attest: L A. Beard, Clerk." Accordingly I kept eight weeks at the expense of the Hamilton company, the school being under the direc- tion of Mr. Beard, then paymaster of that company. During the five months I had ninety-one different scholars. Of this number 1 am not aware that more than four now reside in Lowell, vi::.: J. G. Teabody, A. D. Puiifer, Edwin T. Wilson and Mary T. Beard, the latter a teacher in one of our primary schools since 1844. At the aimual town meeting in R'larch an entire new l)oard or superintending school committee was chosen, consisting of the Rev. Abraham B. Alerrill, William < iardner, Jr., Jonathan C. Merrill, John Johnson and Dr. Harlin Pill>hury. None of these gentlemen have ser\eil im the committee since, except the Rev. Dr. Merrill, who was elected the next year. March 29, 1828, a school meeting was held in District No. 5, and Ca]itain Daniel Balch, Captain John Bassett and Mr. David Cook were chosen prudential committee. April 4, 1S28, the committee agreed with me to teach three months, to commence on the first Monday in October, 1828, for $28 per month, board included. Miss Field taught the school from April 17 to Sep- temlier 2j. at $3.25 jjer week, lioard included. In 1828 the town appropriated $1,200 for schools: Lif this District No. 5 received $150. As part (if the school system the building later occupied by the Free Cha])el in Middlesex street was erected l)y cooperation between the Hamilton and AiJ])leton companies in T829. Mr. Merrill was nidved into that building. His descri])tion of its equipment is graphic: The interior of the new school house was finished under the direc- tion of Mr. Beard, who was an critrinal genius, alwavs inclined to e:et AN ERA OF IIMPROVEMENT 191 up something new ; and this time he succeeded admiralily. Each seat and desk were made for two scholars. The seats had very high board backs. The scholars were seated with their backs toward the teacher's desk ; the reason given was that they could not see the teacher without looking around. When I stood upon the floor I could just see the heads of ni}' largest scholars above the backs of their seats ; but to Compensate for this the teacher's desk was elevated similarly to the pulpits we sometimes see in the old churches. All the woodwork was painted and sanded with very coarse sand, to prevent the scholars from cutting it. In two or three weeks the sand had made such havoc with the children's clothing that Mr. Beard was glad to make peace with their mothers by rubbing off as much of the sand as possible and re- painting. The windows were put very high, so that children could not look out. The heating apparatus, too, I think, must have been original. It was called a furnace. It was built of brick in the southeast corner of the cellar. The chimney, to convey the heat to the school room above, was built on the bottom of the cellar, some forty feet, and then up on one side of the school room. About two feet from the floor an opening six or eight inches square was made, to admit the hot air to warm the room, but it never came. There was always a strong current of air from the school room into the chimney — making an excellent ventilator. After running the stove day and night for some time with- out effect a wood stove was substituted. Nothing more was said about the furnace. The Fight for a Modern School System — l-'ive years after the tcnvn meeting at which the Lowell school system was inaugurated cam,e a test of the sincerity of Dr. Edson's interest in the cause of popular education — a controversy in which he found himself pitted against the strongest influences that could be brought to bear upon a young and ambitious clergyman. He stood his ground, won his con- tention before the people and thus was personally responsible for giving Lowell an eminence in public education which has never been lost. Other factors considered, such as wealth per capita and the dis- advantages of a polyglot population, no other city in America, it is safe to assert, has had a more laudable record of devotion to the prepa- ration of its yotmg people for their work in the world. The district school system, which then as now was fairly well adapted to the needs of rural communities, was by 1830 proved to be quite unsuited to a compact, rapidly growing commimity like Lowell. After some agitation a town meeting appointed a committee of which Dr. Edson was chairman, to propose a better system. At a meeting of April 2, 1832. the committee urged that two modern school houses of the "graded" type be erected. This proposal to incur expense for good schools at once aroused a storm of opposition to which a weaker character then Dr. Edson must have yielded. As General Butler expresses it in his autobiog- raphy: "The taxation of that day for these new grammar schools ot i(j2 HISTORY OF L0\V]':LL brick would he home substantially by the manufacturing companies and the Proprietors of the Locks and Canals. ,Mi-. Boott declared that this could not and would not be done." .\s the project continued to be agitated he presently "informed Mr. Edson that any further advo- cacy of this proposition would so far meet with his disapprobation that he should withdraw from his church and from attendance upon his ministration ; that he should g'ne his attendance and influence to another religious society, and that all support of St. .Xnne's in any- way by the manufacturing companies would be withdrawn." With that regard for truth and right which distinguished him, Dr. Edson went steadily forward as if he had entertained no such threats. His [proposal in its final form came before a town meeting, and won by a majority of eleven \otes. A later meeting was called in an effort of the opposition to rescind the resolution. Messrs. Luther Lawrence and John P. Robinson, celebrated lawyers, how- ever, had been retained to speak in opposition. They accomplished so little with the electorate that the majoritx' in favor of making the appropriation of $20.otx3 for the new school houses was increased to thirty-eight. It was, in fact, a signal triumph for the clergyman. Some of his parishioners and personal friends, nevertheless, were bad losers, like t)ne bv whcmi he was addressed as he left the hall: ''Well, you have got vour school houses," was the taunting assertion, "but you will never get the children into them." Dr. Edson recalls that this gentleman later became one of tlie staunchest friends of the Lowell school system. Kirk Boott withdrew from St. Anne's, but his doing so did not ruin or even sensibly injure the society. One of the best anecdotes of Dr. Edson's earnestness in this contest to secure a system of graded schools for Lowell was related by Frederic T. Greenhalge at the fiftieth anniversary of the incorpo- ration of the city. The story is as follows: ".\t a meeting called to take action as to a school system, the imperious Kirk Boott was opposed to the measure, and declared that it was folly to incur any expense >m its behalf. Lowell was but an exjieriment, and a traveler visiting the place in a few >ears might find only a heap of ruins. Theodore Edson replied that if the traveler exantining these ruins found among them no trace of a school house, he would have no diffi- culty in assigning the cause of the downfall of Lowell. There is logic and wit enough in that retort to have made the reputation of an English ]iriine minister." On February 23, 1833, the former of the two school houses pro- vided for under the town's appropriation was first opened to pupils. It was known as the South Grammar school, frtjm its location on the South Common. It afterwards was named for the man who had fought plnckily for its inception. It is the Edson school. The North AX ERA OF IMPROVEMENT 193 Cirammar school on the North Comniun «-as openctl a Httle later. It became known as the Bartlett school, in honor of the city's first mayor. Thousands of boys and girls have had their elementary edu- cation within its walls, the Edson school being still in use in 1918; the old Hartlett school lately disused. Inauguration of the Lowell High School — "The high school con- tem])lated in our present system,, and recjuired by law," wrote Dr. Edson, as chairman of the school committee, in his report of 1835, "has been kept only part of the year. Of the sum which, upon the most economical calculation, it was estimated that the schools would cost $1,000, was not granted by the town, consequentl}' the committee w'ere enabled to sustain the High School only one-half the time, and to employ but one teacher instead of two. The school, being loudly called for by the community, was opened in August, tuider the care of Mr. ?Iall. About seventy have attended. The school has been kept full, containing sixty members, and the attendance has been good. ^lany more are desirous of the privilege of the school and might be admitted if provision were made for their instruction. The school is prosperous, and the committee are happy to commend it to the favor of the town." Such is the first formal report on one of the most beneficent of Lowell institutions which, since the middle thirties, has ottered to studious boys and girls, of whatever family and financial circum- stances, free instruction carrying them well beyond the bare rudi- ments of education. From the outset to the present time it has been a school of which ever}- alumnus should be proud, one marked by the high scholarship and professional devotion of its teachers, and one in which there has always been an admirable esprit dc corps among the students. The high school's beginning dates back to December, 1831, when it was opened in a room of the Middlesex street school house, after- wards the Free Chapel, having as teacher Thomas M. Clark, later Episcopal Bishop of Rhode Island. Among the pupils who entered for that first class in the Lowell high school was a young fellow named "Ben" Butler, who was destined to be heard from later. In speaking of his classmates this youth afterwards wrote in his "Book :" "There were eight of us in the first class, the classification being made according to apparent advance- ment in scholarship. The one alphabetically at the head, whose edu- cation went no further than in that one school, because afterwards a Boston man in high standing and, later still, a merchant in the State of V' ermont. Another fitted for college in the class, became a graduate of Dartmouth, and died young, standing very high in his profession as L-13 194 JllSroRV OF l.( )\\ I'.LL a sur'^i'eun. AiKjtluT, wIkj^c cducatiuii was ended there, hecame a ci\'il engineer e)f the very highest standing, fuunded the manufacturing city uf Manchester, New Hampsliire, and was, for several years, gov- ernor (if the v^tate. Another, who left the school and became a mid- shijiman in the navy, rose to be of the first class in his profession, and afterwards was the active head uf the nav_\', and (inly efficient one it had during the War of the Rebellion. Andther, going fr(_)m this class to a medical school, fitted himself for his ])rofession as surgeon, and before his untimely death became (,ine of the most successful and best known surgeons of the ctiuntry. Two others became reputable and somewhat distinguished citizens. The remaining one is the writer,'' who was, of course, Major-General Benjamin Franklin Butler. Eiiforts to establish separate schtiols for the children of Irish immigrants began in Alarch, i^'^i. when a cunimiltee C(jmposed (.if Dr. Edson, Rev. Fl. W. F'reenian. Rev. I'Jiphalet Case, Dr. I'llisha Bartlett and Josiah Crosby was appointed by the town "t(j determine whether it is expedient to establish a sch(.iol district f(.ir the Irish children in Lowell." This committee, at the .\pril meeting, rejiorted as follows : That a schdol for the Irish children has been kept about two years. Last vear the town voted the sum of $50 for its support. According to the rule by which the school money is now divided, this, if made a district, wotiW receive $50. The average number of children attending the school is about thirty. The Irish population is located conveniently to f(irm a district of themselves; therefore, your com- mittee recommend : That the Irish population living on the Acre so called, be formed intd a district, t(.) be called District No. 7. That such Irish families not living within the above limits who, in the opini(.in (if the Super- intending School Committee, are conveniently situated, may send to the school in District No. 7. This arrangement seems not to have given entire satisfaction and after a i)eriod of experiment the committee, with the cooperation of the Roman Catholic pastor, tl:e Rev. Father Connoll}-, authorized the establishment of special schools for Catholics, to be taught only by Catholics and with use of text books satisfactory to adherents of that church. The committee jirescribed as conditions of the opening of such schools that: "i. That the instructors must l)e examined as to their qualifications by the committee and receive their appoint- ments from them,; 2. That the books, exercises and studies should all be prescribed and regulated by the committee, and that no other whatever should be taught or allowed ; 3. That these schools should be placed as respects the examination, inspection and general super- vision of the committee, on precisely the same ground as the other AN ERA OV 1 M PROVEM ENT 195 schools ot the town." 'I'hrcc Catholic schools were eventually con- ducted iur a time under this arrangement. Other municipal departments besides the schools made their start under the town government. One of the most interesting of these, for ol)\ious reasons, was the tire department. Early Days of the Fire Department — Protection of the town's man_\- wooden liuildings from tire was necessarily more or less hap- hazard in the first years. Just as in smaller places down to this day an alarm, of fire drew forth a motley collection of volunteers and small boys. Out from the nearest engine house was drawn the ancient "hand tub." Everybody ran behind it en route to the fire. The machine somehow was hitched up to one of the i:)rimitive hydrants of the da}' and a stream from a half-inch hose was played more or less etTcclually ujjon the conllagration. All illuminating account of the primitive system has been con- trilnited l.)y Erank X. Owen, who writes: In common with the custom observed in the larger towns in the Commonwealth, Lowell had a fire society in those earlier days. It was known as the Lowell United Fire Society, and its members were required to keep hanging in a convenient and accessible place a leather fire bucket for each male member of the household. Upon an alarm of tire they were recpiired to seize the buckets and repair to the fire, where they did service in passing the water. Some of these fire buckets are still preserved in many of the older families of the city. They were elaborately painted and decorated and had the name of the owner painted thereon. Mrs. Ransom Reed, resident on Tvler street, has two buckets in a good state of preservation, marked "Lowell U. F. Society, Ransom Reed, 1828." Secretary Philbrick, of the Veteran Firemen's Association, has in his custody a bucket for- merly kept in the house of Jonathan M. Marston, and other families in the city have one or more which are carefully preserved as relics. At an annual meeting of the town, held in March, 1829, steps were taken for the organization of a fire department, and $1,000 was voted to equip the same with a tire engine, hose, etc. The firewards were authorized to purchase the engine, and were appointed a committee to consider the subject of forming a fire department. The firewards made arrangements for the purchase of an engine, etc., and also reported favorably in the matter of forming a fire department. At an adjourned meeting of the town it was voted that the firewards act as a committee "to locate and build an engine house, and to provide places for keeping the ladders, fire hooks, etc." in compliance with this order the firewards voted, at their next meet- ing: "That the engine house be located on the easterly side of Cen- tral street, between the corner of Merrimack street and the Canal Bridge, on the land of the Proprietors of the Locks and Canals Com- pany, where it may remain, rent free, till such time as the said com- pany have occasion to make some other use of the land, when it is to be removed by the town to some other place." 196 HISTORY OF LOWELL Tlie act formally creating the Lowell Fire Department was passed by the Legislature, February 6, 1830. It was not, however, until some time afterward that active measures were taken to organize a depart- ment on an efficient basis. The first fire engine purchased was called the Niagara, and was kejjt in a house at the corner of Central and Merrimack streets, afterwards being removed to what is now Hosford Sf|uare. In 1832. Captain Josiah G. Peabody, Charles Gregg and others organized a fire company, which did efficient service. From this time until 1836 the engineers were as follows: Kirk Boott, 1832; Joseph Tyler, 1833, 1834, 1835; Oliver M. Whipple, from 1835 to 1836. The assistants were : Joseph Tyler, \^'arren Colburn, 1832 ; George Brownell, 1832, 1833. 1835 ; J. AL Dodge, 1832. 1834, 1835 ; O. M. Whip- ple. 1833, 1834. 1835; Alvah ^Nlansur, 1833, ^^34'- Israel Whitney. 1833. 1S34; Ahiel .\bbott. 1833 ; James Cook. 1833, 1834, 1835 : William Wyman, 1833; Cleorge Motley, 1835: John A\ery. 1833: Jonathan Bowers, 1833, 1834, 1835; Charles L. Tilden, S. A. Colnirn, I])avid Dana. Jonathan Al. Marston and .-Xlpheus Smith. 1835. The Coming of the Churches — The cnnimencement of religious services in downtown I,owell and the establishment of St. Anne's Church has been described. As the town acquired a population of prevailingly religious people its churches luultiplied and grew pros- perous. The consecration of St. Anne's, as noted, occurred on March 16, 1825. Thence followed parochial acti\'ities which belong to the records of the town. The early wardens, with their dates of election, were: Warren Colburn, 1825; Allan Pollock. 1825; Joel Lewis, 1827; John C). (ireen. 1830; Elisha Huntington. 1833; J. H. B. Ayer, 1833; Robert Cleans, 1835; George Brownell, 1835. Successive treasurers were Xathaniel Gordon, 1824: Thomas Billings. 1828; Benjamin Mather, 1821) ; George H. Carleton, 1833. The first three clerks were George B. Pollock, 1824; Joel Lewis, 1828; Daniel Bixby, 1835. The first baptism was that of John Wright, son of Kirk and Anne Boott, ^Nlarch 20. 1825 : the first funeral, that of a child of Josiah B. French, January 12, 1827. On August 26, 1826, Joel Lewis offered himself for the first confirmation. On July 17. 1825. James Flood and Harriet Bowers l)ccame the church's first Iiridal pair. The good Dr. Edson's activities, except his interest in costly edu- cational innen-ations. as recorded above, were of a sort to justify the expectaU(jns entertained of him by the directors of the Merrimack Compan\'. He has told about them at a later date. "My early rela- tions with tile Merrimack Corporation," he related at the fiftieth anni- versarv exercises in 1876, "it having given the church and parsonage, and for the first few years gathered the pew rents for the support of divine worship, as a provision for all the people in their employ, o ■J. AN ERA OF IMPROVEMENT 197 being- it was l:)ut riglit to make the ministrations as generalK- and as extensively acceptable as might be, gave a very general claim upon my services, and it is but a fair question to ask whether my pastoral labor for the rich and poor, ministering to the sick and afflicted, the dying and the dead, caring for the children and their education, and ready discharge of other ordinary items of ministerial duty, have been such as to justif}' the original outlay and answer the reasonable expecta- tions of the Merrimack Company." Concerning the significance of this establishment of .St. Anne's Church at East Chelmsford, Bishop William, Lawrence dwelt at some length in his sermon at the sevent_\-fifth anniversary of the church: "Although a majority of the directors of the Merrimack Company were Unitarians, they voted to build an Episcopal Church : and an Episcopal clergyman was called. We can hardly appreciate the sig- nificance of that now. Although the Episcopal Church was very little known in Massachusetts outside of Boston, and was not recognized there as a church of reconciliation, yet here, in this city, the Episcopal Church was planted, the only parish for the whole community — the house of worship for Christian ])eoi)le of all names. Here, at the Lord's table knelt the members of many denominations, and at the hands of the pastor received the Sacrament. Here, in unity of spirit and the bond of peace, they prayed in the praters of their common ancestors of old England. Here they together recited the Apostles' Creed, to which for several generations New England had been a stranger. Thus, until the growth of the population demanded new churches, St. .Anne's stood, like a parish church in old England, as the church of the whole people." Toward the support of St. .Anne's every operative on the Merri- mack cor])oration was at first required to spend pay thirty-seven and one-half cents a month. A story of the rejection by a i)orti<.)n of the jjopulation of the religious services that the conqiany at first may have thought to make ol.jligatory tipon all, has been told by the Rev. D. C. Eddy, D. D., who said, in an address at the semi-centennial jubilee of the First Baptist church : "After the consecration of the Episcopal church by Bishop Griswold in 1S23, the inhabitants of the \illage made it their religious home, without much declaration of sect or creed. It was doubtless the intention of some of the directors of the Merrimack company, espe- cially of their agent and treasurer. Kirk Boott, to make the place an Episco])al settlement. The operatives were expected to attend serv- ice, and the sum necessary to pay for a seat in the sanctuary was regu- larly deducted from the wages of each. Mr. Boott, with his English education. Episcopal tendencies and military habits, did not readily see how burdensome such taxation must be to a people edticated in 198 HISTORY OF LOWELL New England, and whu inhcritfcl all the just prejudices of their ances- tors against an established church, and a religion supported t)\- the taxation of those who declined to enjoy its benefits. Against such an enforced system of worship old New England has always Ijeen veheinenth' protestant, and when somelhing like it was tried in Lowell, all outside of the I'4)iscopal church were dissenters. Yet until two other churches were formed, the First Baptist and the First Con- gregational, the latter of which was organized in 1826, a few months after the form,er had begun its existence, the tax continued, but was at length abandoned, a very strong public opinion expressing itself against it." There was, as a matter of tact, room for many denominations in the expanding community. The Baptist church, which made a great man_\ con\-erts in this part of New England about 1820, claims a certain priority even over the Episcopalians, in that meetings addressed by Rev. John Park- hurst, of South Chelmsford, were held in 1822 at the house of Abel Rugg, at the corner of Flosford Square and Wamesit street. Shortly after the Episcopal church occu])ieil St. Anne's the Baptists estab- lished a meeting (if their own in the vacated school house of the Merrimack company, and early in r826 definitely organized a religious society, inviting Rev. John Cookson, then of Maiden, to become their first ])astor. Their meeting house was dedicated November 15, 1826. The I'irst Congregational Church was founded as a consequence of the gathering together f(_ir ser\ice cif prayer in 1824 at a corpora- tion licjarding- house of a few men and women who had a jireference f(ir the traditional forms of New England orthodoxy. Their society was organized June 2(>, i82r>, with a memliership of about fifty persons. In 1827 they dedicated the h(.)use of worshij) on Merrimack street, which down to 1S84 was a Lowell Lmdmark. The first ])astor was the Rev. Ceorge C. lieckwith, who served less than two years. Me was succeeded by the Rev. Amos Blanchard, D. D., whose ministry lasted fourteen years. Roman Catholicism, now so |)roniinent in the religious life of Lowell, had an approjiriate field for expansion even in the first days of the town. Mass was celebrated, so far as known for the lirst time at East Chelmsford, by the Rev. John Mahoney, in 1822. Many Irish workers were already employed in excavating and construction, and some of them haung ]\Ien's Temperance Society, which was organized September 15, 1833. Its officers were: President, John W. Graves ; vice-president, Samuel F. Haven ; secre- tary, L. P. Patch ; treasurer, Moses F. Eaton ; executive committee, Seth Ames. Thomas B. Thayer, Samuel B. Simonds, H. C. Meriam. Charles M. Morrill, Sylvanus Adams, T. P. Saunders, Daniel Bixby. J. W. Mansur, William Hall. Reminiscences of the crusade against intemperance were also included in a paper of Judge Samuel P. Hadley's childhood recollec- tions of Middlesex Village. "The great temperance movement abotit 1839 or 1840," he writes, "had in it a very important and, as I regard it, a very beautiful feature, the organization of the children of the country in the 'cold water army,' and the 4th of July was selected as the day on which to make its most imposing demonstrations. Thou- sands of children, of all ages, dressed in their best, with music, ban- ners, flowers and what was infinitely more beautiful, happy, joyous 20.S msroRV of i.owell faces, moved in lung processions thmugh iTundreds of New England villages to some shady grove where they heard speeches, sang their songs of the virtues of cold water, partcnik iif a generous collation and returned home, tired but happy." Visitors' Comments on Lowell — What the dUtside world thought of the "Spindle Cit)-" in its first decade has been recorded in many amusing jiassages. It liecame "the thing" for whoever visited New England tn jnake a special trip to Lowell, the industrial show place of the Nation. The somewhat oriental descriptions which many \isitors wrote of the beauties of the community Ix-low the falls must undi mlttedly be t.nkcn with allowance for the grandiloquence of the age. It remains true, nevertheless, that Lowell as a village was a more attractive place than it has e\er been since. .American architecture had not vet altogether outgrown the regard for style and good pro- portions which made our colonial houses and churches one of the finest outflowerings of art in the history of wooden construction. Most of the Iniilding that was done at East Chelmsford was plain and utili- tarian, but the materials were solid and good and the total effect, as is seen in sur\iving examples, must have been one of dignit_\- and sobri- etv. The influence of President Thomas Jefferson, the foremost advo- cate I if a purelv classical style of architecture, is unmistakably seen in the manner of many of the mure ambitious residences surviving from the twenties, such as the Kirt Boott house, the Nesmith houses in Bel- videre, the Tucke house in Cenlralville. Far in the future still was the succession of nondescript and debased manners, after \\hlch in Lowell, as in all .\merican cities, residences were fashioned between, say, 1850 and the present period of partial regeneration. It is safe, therefore, to conjecture that the appearance of the vil- lage of which Kirk Boott was town manager was not altogether un- worthv of this panegyric of the editor of the "Essex Gazette," of .Salem, who, on August 25. 1825, thus ga\'e in detail his impressions of the place : .'\s we ascended the high grounds which lie on the side of the Merrimack, the beautiful valley which has been chosen for the site of manufacturing establishments opened tipon our view. It is indeed a fairy scene Here we behold an extensive city, busy, noisy and thriving, with immense prospects of increasing extent and boundless wealth. * * * On the banks of the Merrimack are already three superb factories and two immense piles of brick buildings for calico- printing. In front of these, on the banks of the factory canal which is fenced in and ornamented with a row of elms, are situated the houses of the people. They are handsomely and uniformly painted, with flower gardens in front and separated by wide avenues. There is a beautiful Gothic stone church [St. Anne's] opposite the dwelling houses, and a parsonage of stone is erecting. There is a post office, AX ERA OF I]MPRO\"EMENT 209 fine taverns, one (if which is a superb stone edifice, with outbuildings of the same material, and perhaps two hundred houses all fresh from the hands of the w^irkmen. The ground is intersected with fine roads and good bridges. The whole seems like enchantment, .\bout three hundred persons, two-thirds of whom are females, yoimg women from the neighboring towns, are employed. The women earn from a dollar to two dollars a week, according to skill. We stood gazing at this fairy vision at the distance of a mile. The roar of the waterfalls is intermingled with the hum and buzz of the machinery. There seemed to be a song of triumph and exultation at the successful union of nature with the art of man, in order to make her cnntribute to the wants and ha]:)piness of the human family. One of the first oi the many distinguished visitors from abroad who were attracted to Lowell, and whose impressions naturally form a part of any comprehensive story of the city, was Captain Basil Hall. R. N. (1788-1844). This explorer of China, Corea and South America, who was a voltiminous writer of travel literature, saw the United States in 1827-28, and in 1829 brought out a volume of impressions whose comtnents on American manners created considerable stir in this cotmtry. His references to Lowell were complimentary. "A few years ago," he wrote, "the spot which we now saw covered with huge cotton mills, canals, roads and bridges, was a mere wilderness, and, if not quite solitary, was inhabited only by painted savages. Under the convoy of a friendly guide, who allowed us to examine not only what we pleased but how we pleased, we investigated the works very care- fully. The stufts manufactured at Lowell, mostly of a coarse descrip- tion, are woven entirely by power looms, and are intended, I am told, chiefly for home consumption. Everything is paid for by the piece : but the people work only from daylight to dark, having half an hour to breakfast and as long for dinner. The whole discipline, ventilation and other arrangements appeared to be excellent, of which the best proof was the cheerful and healthv look of the girls, all i)f whom, by the way, were trigged out with much neatness and simplicity, and wore high tortoise shell combs at the Ijack of their heads." Just before the incorporation as a city. Lowell was inspected by Michel Chevalier, the distinguished French economic writer, whose somewhat impressionistic comment is also worth reproducing: The town of Lowell dates its origin eleven years ago and it now contains 15,000 inhabitants, inclusive of the suburb of Belvidere. Twelve years ago it was a barren waste, in which the silence was interrupted only by the murmur of the little river, the Concord, and the noisy dashings of the clear waters of the Merrimack against the granite blocks that suddenly obstruct their course. At present it is a pile of huge factories, each five, six or seven stories high, and capped with a little white belfry which strongly contrasts with the red masonry iii the building and is distinctly projected on the dark hills I.-14 210 HISTORY OF L( )W I'.LL in the Injriznn. By the side uf these larger structures rise numerous little wooden houses, painted white, with green blinds, very neat, very snug, very nicely carpeted, and with a few small trees around them, I ir brick houses in the English style, that is to say, simple and tasteful without and comfortable within ; one side, fancy goods shops and mil- liners' rooms without number, for the women are the majority in Lowell ; and vast hotels in the American style, very much like bar- racks (the only barracks in Lowell) ; on another, canals, water-wheels, water-falls, bridges, banks, schools and libraries. f(ir in Lowell read- ing is the only recreation, and there are no less than seven journals published there. All around are churches and meeting houses of every sect, Episcoimlian, Baptist, Congregationalist, Methodist, Universalist, Unitarian, etc., and there is also a Roman Catholic chapel. Here are all the edifices of a flourishing town of the Old World, except the prisons, hospitals and theatres; everywhere is heard the noise of ham- mers, of spindles, of bells calling the hands to work or dismissing them from their tasks, of coaches and six arriving or starting off, of the blowing of rocks to make a mill-race or to level a road; it is the peaceful hum of an industrious population whose movements are regu- lated like clockwork ; a population not native to the town, and one- half of which at least will die elsewhere, after having aided in found- ing three or four other towns ; for the full-blooded American has this in common with the Tartar, that he is encamped, not established, on the soil he treads upon. One of the most celebrated \v liefore the public which furnish the conclusion that the grant of a railroad is a public exigency, even for such a purpose. The remonstrants would also add that so far as they know there can never be a sufficient inducement to extend a railroad westwardly and northwestwardly to the Connecticut, as to make it the great avenue to and from the interior, but that its termination must be at Lowell and, consequently, that it is to be a substitute for the modes of transportation now in use and cannot deserve patronage from the supposition that it is to be more extensively useful." The contention of these remonstrants was su|>ported in the Legis- lature by so cogent an argument as that of Rejiresentative Cogswell, of Ipswich, who averred that : "Railways, Mr. Speaker, may do well AN ERA OF IMPROVEMENT 213 enough in the old countries, but will never be the thing for so yoiuig a country as this." Despite such antagonism from vested interests, the plan that was proposed by Patrick Tracy Jackson and others of the group of capital- ists who had founded Lowell was finallj- authorized by the General Court, and work was begun upon what is now the main line of the Boston & Maine system, southern division. The first locomotive ran over the road. May 27, 1835. This was a trial trip, the train consisting of the locomotive and a single car, carrying a few passengers. The running time was one hour, seventeen minutes. A newspaper paragraph regarding the success ot the Boston & Lowell railroad stated on October 16, 1833: "This road has been in use since the middle of June last, and every business man in town has felt the convenience of it. No official statement of the amount of receipts has been given ; but we are informed that up to the first day of the present month the number of passengers both ways was within a fraction of 50,000, a little less than 4,000 a v\-eek." Some unusually valuable "details regarding this pioneer transpor- tation enterprise were given in a paper on "Early Days of Railroad- ing in Lowell," by Herbert C. Taft, read March 2, 1909, before the Lowell ■ H istorical Association. Prior to the opening of the Boston and Lowell railroad, according to Mr. Taft, an average of forty-five stages arrived and departed daily at Lowell, employing from 250 to 300 horses. Rather more than half these stages made the journey back and forth to Boston. The freight rates to that city were froin $2.50 to $4.00 per ton. Passengers were carried at $1.25 each. The promoters of the new railroad estimated that the line would yield them from its carriage of merchandise about $30,434 annually, and that the gross receipts from passengers would be $28,089, giving a total revenue or gross revenue of $58,523. This was a sufficient in- ducement to interest some of the capitalists of the day. It was esti- mated that the cost of making the railroad would be $400,000. To be sure of not running short, a total capital of $600,000 was raised. The construction was very substantial and solid — in some respects need- lessly so, as when the rails were bolted to stone sleepers, costly to cut and to handle. The cost of the line aggregated about $60,000 a mile. The payroll of the road at its inception would cause the soul of a modern railroad president to rejoice. A superintendent was em- ployed at a salary of $1,500; a clerk at $500. In each city there were two clerks and two warehousemen whose wages totaled $1,500. Two engineers were engaged at two dollars a day each, and two tenders at one dollar a day. The whole salary list amounted to only $5,372 a per annum. 214 HISTORY OF LOWKLL .\ [jfouil (lay fur Patrick Tracy Jackson was Wednesday, May 17, 1835, when the first run was made eiver the completed railway between the two cities. The engine, appropriately named the "Stephenson," was one that had been built by the Robert Stephenson Company of Newcastle-iipon-T\-ne. It was brouyht ti.i this country in sectinns, which upon their arrival were placed in a canal boat and brought over the Middlesex canal, whose usefulness this very shipment was soon to destroy. Why the engine should have been run fr(jm Lowell to IWis- ton has been variously conjectured. Possibly the explanation is that mechanics capable of assembling it and looking it over before the start were surest to be found in the manufacturing town. The departure, at any rate, was made from the northern terminus. The passengers were Mr. Jackson, agent of the com]iany during the construction ; George \\'. Whistler, chief engineer of the Locks and Canals Company : James F. Baldwin, the civil engineer wdio made the railroad. The run to Boston was accomplished in one hour and seventeen minutes. The return trip, with twenty-four ])assengers aboard, required one hour and forty minutes. After this experimental trip \arious details evidentl_\- had to be completed, fur the ser\ice was not opened to the public until June 24 following Concerning the running of the first trains out of Li)well. Mr. Taft recalls that the original conductor was John Barrett, a native New Englander. The original engineer, who merited the adjective in both senses of the word, was W'illiam Roliinson. a Briton, who had been imported for this special wiirk. Robinson took a quite li.ifty view of his own indispensalileness, and readily undertook to play upon the credulity of the ignorant natives. "He was not very particular about train time, would saunter up to the depot about an hoiu- after his train was due to start, carelessly look around upon the waiting passengers, look over his engine, mount the platform, put on his kid gloves and in his own good time and pleasure, start his train toward Boston. He would also stop his train suddenly when he got nearly to a station, jumj) down, look the engine over anxiously, crawl under it, remove a nut from some bolt, look it over and put it liack again. The next day the i)a]iers would have an account of how the engine had broken down on its way, but had been skillfull}- repaired by Engineer Robinson. It was not li-)ng, however, before tb.e manag'ement caught on, and he was replaced by a skilled mechanic from the Locks and Canals Locomotive Works, frcjm which source the eiiginers reipiired were obtained for many years." What the Baldwin Locomotive Works are to American railroad- ing to-day, the Locks and Canals Works, later the Lowell Machine Shop, was to the transj)ortation system before the war. The readi- AN ERA OF IMPROVEMENT 215 ness with which some of General Butler's men repaired a locomotive in the first days of the Civil A\'ar was not surprising, as they had been trained in a shop which fcjr a long time had engine building as one of its specialties. The first locomotive to be built at Lowell was placed upon the rails, June 30, iiS35. No longer was the railroad dependent upon Eng- lish machine shops. The naming of this engine created something of a local commotion. In compliment to Patrick Tracy Jackson, it was proposed to call the new locomotive "The Jackson." It happened, however, that at the moment feeling among Lowell Whigs against General Andrew Jackson ran very high, and strenuous objection to this naming were registered. .\s a compromise the management of the machine shop called the engine "The Patrick." A second one was finished four days later and was christened "The Lowell." This loco- motive was the first to be devoted exclusively to freight hauling. The first ticket agent at the JNIerrimack street station was a Mr. Long. His honesty was evidently never in question, for his oppor- tunities for collusion with himself seem to have been unlimited. The system was such, the tradition goes, that he sold the tickets at the sta- tion and then went aboard the train just before it started, to collect them. The railroad had been chartered to carry passengers to Boston for seventy-five cents ; the management at once set a price of one dol- lar. To live within the law, however, one car on each train was run at the legal price. This was a rude open box car with a few rough pine seats. People who possibly could aft'ord to pay the additional twenty- five cents never rode in the second-class car. The ])resent elaborate classification of freight rates was still to be invented. A flat price of $1.25 for 2,000 pounds between Lowell and Boston was charged. In carload lots one got a rate of $1.10. The first station to be used in Boston was that on Lowell street. In 1S57 the company erected a depot on the present site in Causeway street. Concerning this inauguration of railroad service between Lowell and Boston. Mrs. Robinson says, in "Loom and Spindle:" "I saw the first train that went out of Lowell, and there was great excitement over the event. People were gathered along the street near the 'deepot,' discussing the great wonder; and we children stayed at home from school, or ran barefooted from our play, at the first toot of the whistle. As I stood on the sidewalk I remember hearing those who stood near me disputing as to the probable result of this new attempt at locomotion. 'The ingine never can start all them cars.' 'She can, loo.' 'She cant. I don't believe a word of it.' '.She'll break down and kill everybody,' was the cry." CHAPTER IX. Lowell, the Ante-Bellum City. "To consider if any alteration^ or nindilications in the municipal regulations of said town are necessary, and if so, the expediency of establishing a city governn:ent" was the object of the appointment of a committee of twenty-fi\e citizens of the town nf Ldwell on February 3. 1836. A town meeting had reached the conclusiun that the time might be at hand for adopting a form of government to which Boston had already attained and for which Salem had just received atithorization. This committee consisted of Luther Lawrence, chairman : Erastus Douglas, Granville Parker, Eliphalet Case, Walter Willey, John Xes- mith, Thomas P. Goodhue, Oliver M. Whipple, Isaac Swan, William Austin, Thomas Flint, Joseph W. Mansur, Richard Fowler, Seth Ames, Daniel H. Dean, Joel Stone, Jr., Henr}- L. Baxter, Hamlin Davis, L RI Doe, John R. Adams, John Aiken, John Chase, George Brownell, William N. Owen. Thus was inaugurated a movement toward making a modern municipality of the manufacturing village on the Merrimack. The form of government which, it was almi_ist a foregone conclusion, the citizens' committee would recommend, was that under which most readers of this work have li\ed. It was based on the familiar Ameri- can combination of poijular representation and di\'ided responsibility. The defects of the system became so apparent to a later generation that in Lowell, as in many other municipalities, an attempt has been made to centralize authorit}- in :i single commission. In its first years at least, the administration of civic affairs of New England communi- ties, through a mayor, board of aldermen and common council, indi- cated no breakdown in the theory of popular self-government. Under the municipal government, and often through its initiative, were de- veloped institutions of public use and enjoyment such as ha\-e made the modern city, for all its drawbacks, a better place for most people to work in and to live in than the rural communities by which it is surroimded. The advantages of the city are often minimized by resi- dents to whom the defects are annoyingly evident and who are victims of the "golden age" delusion, perpetually looking back to earlier and more jirimitix-e conditions with a will to believe those better than the present circumstances. Neither politically nor economically has the development of Lowell since 1836 been ideal. Improvements have been wrought with difficulty ; in some departments of the common life there has been retrogression. Yet it was a good citv that was THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 217 founded at the junction of the rivers a quarter of a century liefore the Civil A\'ar, and a good city it has remained. From the days of Theo- dore Edson and Elisha Bartlett onward it has been a privilege to be born and reared in such a community as Lowell. Events moved rapidly after the question of becoming a citv was broached by the townspeople. An adjourned meeting was held on February 17. 1836, at which the foregoing committee submitted a report which was accepted and adopted. It read as follows: The committee appointed ''to consider and report if any modifica- tions or alterations in the municipal regulations of the town are neces- sarv', and if so. the expediency of establishing a city government," and of petitioning the Legislature at their present session for a charter for that purpose, have had the same under consideration, and now ask leave to report. Our New England ancestors, among their first acts after their arrival in this country, marked out and divided such portions of their wilderness into towns as the}- chose to improve and possess for their government. Those laws were characterized very strongly by their peculiar manners and habits of the age, and were skillfully adapted to the resolute and self-denying spirit of their authors. Many of those statutes are now in form with little or no alteration. Such were the spirit and principles of most of them that they are suited to all men in every condition of life, who cherish a love of civil and religious liberty and a determination to maintain and enjoy free and equal rights. Much and most of what is now or ever has been estimable in the New England manners and character may be ascribed to the influence of our municipal regulations. Religious worship, free schools, the care of the poor and the highways, were the principal objects of early legislation for towns. The first has ceased to be under the care of the town ; the others, with the preservation of the health of the people, are now the great and engrossing objects over which towns extend their care. The exist- ing laws are well adapted to the wants of towns of a small or moderate size in point of numbers, but have been found insufficient for the efficient regulation of those that have a large population. Special legislation has been resorted to, in many instances, for large towns, but in most cases, when their numbers were not sufficient to entitle them to a city government. The principal defects in the operation of the present system of laws as it respects large towns, and especially Lowell, are the want of executive power and the loose and irresponsible manner in which money is granted and expended tor municipal purposes. It is believed to be impossible to provide a remedy for these defects in the town under the present system. Such a modification of the laws is necessary that the power of granting and expending money and of executing the laws be so concentrated that direct and well defined responsibility to the people may be imposed on those who have the administration of the public afi'airs. Having thus expressed an opinion on the first proposition submitted, your com- mittee now proceed to consider the second, to wit, the expediency of establishing a city government. This last proposition presents a grave question, that of changing the frame and form of our municipal gov- 2iS HISTORY OF LOWHLL ernment, with which are identifu-d niiich uf uur prosj)erity and happi- ness. In deciding this question it is necessary to keep constantly before the mind the number of our inhabitants, their dissimilar habits, manners and pursuits, the rapid and progressive increase of our popu- lation, the variety of interest and the constant changes which are tak- ing place. It is certain that some change is necessary in our present system to preserve health and to live in peace and security. Such a government as the well-being and prosperity of the town require, in the opinion of your committee, cannot in any way be so easily attained as in the establishment of a city government. The town may continue a few years under the present system, Init the time is near at hand wdien there must be a change and a citv government or something similar must be adopted. The difference in the expense of the present system and a city government will necessarily be from one to two thousand dollars annually, and it may be less after the new government is put into o|)erati(in : much, however, in that respect must depend on the provi- sions in the charter of the new government and the administration under it. The charter should, as much as possible, restrain and guard against extravagance, and should grant to those entrusted with power no more patronag"e than is absolutely necessary for the prompt and forceful execution of the laws. Finally, your committee are of opinion that it is expedient to establish a city government, and that the town [letition the Legislature now in ^ession to grant a charter for that pur- pose. And they beg leave to report the resolves below- for that ]>ur- pose, all of which is submitted. Per order, Luther L.\wrence, Chairman. Resolved, That it is expedient that the Town of Lowell become a city, and that the Selectmen of Lowell be a committee to draft a peti- tion and jiresent the same to the legislature now in session, to grant a charter to make said town a cit)-. and establish a city government therein. A further resolve was : Resolved, That Luther Lawrence, Eliphalet Case, John Nesmith, Oliver M. Whipple, William Austin, Joseph W^ Mansur, Seth Ames, Joel Stone, Jr., Amos Spalding, Hamlin Davis, John R. Adams, John Chase, William N. Owen, Erastus Douglass, Granville Parker, Walter W'illey, Thomas P. Goodhue, Isaac Swan, Thomas Flint, Richard Fowder, Daniel H. Dean, Henr\- I. Baxter, J. M. Doe, John Aiken, George Brownell, Joseph Locke, David Boynton, Tappan Wentworth, John Mixer, Peter H. Willard. Benjamin Walker, Samuel A. Coburn, Thomas Hopkinson, Benjamin Hutchinson, and Thomas A. Comins be a committee to draft a charter for the purpose aforesaid and present the same to the said town as soon as may be for their consideration and approval. The act b}- which the General Court incorporated the city of Lowell was signed by Governor Edward Everett on April i, 1836, sub- ject to a referendum of the voters of the town. This latter was held April II, 1836. The vote resulted as follows: THE ANTE-r.ELLUM CirV 219 WIioU" number of votes 1,289 Yeas 961 Nays 32S The outcome of the first election for officers of the new city was: Mayor, EHsha Bartlett. Aldermen : William Austin, resigned Octo- ber 10; Joseph Tapley, elected in November; Benjamin Walker, Oliver Al. \\'hi])i)le, Seth Ames, Alexander Wright, Aaron RIansur. City clerk: Samuel A. Coburn. Common council: John Clark, president; Stephen RIansur. Henry J. Baxter, John Mixer, Jonathan Bowers, Thomas Nesmith, George Brownell, David Nourse, James Cook, Thomas Ordway, David Dana, James Russell, Erastus Douglas, John A. Savels, Josiah B. French. Sidney Spalding, Cyril French, Weld Spalding, Samuel Garland, Jonathan Tyler, Horatio \\ . Hastings, Tappan Wentworth, Horace Howard, William Wyman. George Woodward, clerk, died, .\lbert Locke elected. Thus, under favoring auspices, began the experiment of munici- pal government which, in this chapter, is described in outline down to the outbreak of the war between the American States. It must not be supposed that the first election cind the subsequent municipal elections were free from popular furore and partisan bitterness. The middle decades of the nineteenth centur} were marked throughout the United States by political exuberance. The first municipal election in Lowell, which was characteristic of many more to follow, was thus described by Charles Cawley some twenty years after the event : The canvass preceding the election of the first mayor was distin- guished by extraordinary excitement. An eye-witness — Dr. Htmting- ton, in his recently published address before the Middlesex North District Medical Society on the life and character of Dr. Bartlett — well observed that "political parties were nearly equally divided, and politi- cal feeling was at fever heat. Each party was desirous of the honor of inaugurating the young municipality." Each party nominated its most available candidate. The Whigs concentrated their strength on Dr. Elisha Bartlett ; and, with his name inscribed upon their banner, they felt strong and well grounded assurance of victory. The unterri- fied democracy, nothing alarmed by the action of their Whig friends, nominated Eliphalet Case, Esquire, and determined to elect him whether he received the requisite number of votes or not. Mr. Case had been the first pastor of the first Universalist Church, but had ceased to beat "the drum ecclesiastic," and had addicted himself con amore to the desperate game of politics. He was the most adroit political manager that had appeared in these regions since the days of that other ex-priest, the Indian sachem, Passaconaway. (Jnce the contest had been settled, neighbors, of course of oppos- ing political faiths, settled down to their peaceful vocations and avoca- tions. The electorate had chosen an able and honest chief executive • 220 HISTORY OF LOW I'.LL it did nothing less in the subsequent years. Of the succession of mayors in the first two decades Cowley says : "Our mayors have been solid but not brilliant men — honestly, judiciously and quietly discharg- ing their magisterial functions, but making little display and employ- ing no trumpeters to proclaim abroad their fame. No charge of cor- rtiption, j)eculation or official misconduct has ever been seriously alleged against any of them. Once or twice disturbances have occurred and the riot act has been read ; but otherwise no striking events have transpired in connection with our municipal administrations." The political history of the city from the incorporation onward is not easy to trace in detail. There were numerous currents and cross currents. The community at the outset was normally safe for the Whigs on National and State issues, if only the Whig party had been united against the Democrats. Inter-party feuds, however, were re- flected in the voting population of a city as alive to considerations of State and National politics as Lowell then was. The situation was fur- ther mixed by the perpetual local issue of "corporation" and "anti-cor- poration." Many citizens, including not a few of the representatives of families who were on the ground before the manufacturing companies came to East Chelmsford, were resentful of any and all attempts of the corporation agents to "steer the city government." This issue, in one form and another, was continually appearing. The mayors of the early vears were, as Cowley has noted, with- out exception high-grade men. Even a sketchy account of their per- sonnel shows that under municijial government the voters, however divided in party allegiance, did not fall under the influence of tricksters or demogogues. Lowell's Earliest Mayors — The first of the ante-bellum mayors, as already stated, was Dr. Elisha Bartlett, M. D., born at Smithfield, Rhode Island, October 6, 1804, and trained at the Brown University Medical School and by a year of hospital study in Europe. Dr. Bart- lett moved to Lowell as a young man to practice his profession and quickly became a very popular citizen. He was reelected to the mayoralty in 1837. The Bartlett School was named in his honor. Never a robust man — like many of the leading spirits of Lowell in the tubercular decades — he presently became a chronic invalid. He re- moved to his former home at Smithfield and died there in 1855. Ltither Lawrence, the second mayor, was of the Lawrences of Grotiin, where he was born September 28, 1778. He was graduated from Harvard College in 1801. After successfully practicing law in Groton he removed in 1831 to Lowell. During his second term he was killed, A]iril 17, 1839, by accidentally stepping into a penstock. A very distinguished citizen was Dr. Elisha Huntington, the third mayor of Lowell, whose years of service in this ofiice were 1840-41-44- THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 221 45-52-56-58 and part of 1859. In his honor Huntington Hall was named. His descendants have further enhanced the reputation of the great name which he established. Dr. Huntington was born at Topsfield in 1796, a son of the Rev. .^sahel Huntington, fcir twentj'-fix'e years a minister in that town. He was graduated from Dartmouth College in 181 5. After completing his medical education he came to Lowell in 1824 to practice his profession. His public service began in 1833 when lie was elected to the board of selectmen. Under the new city charter he was in the common councils of 1837-38-39, serving as president for two years. Besides being mayor as stated, he was in the board of aldermen in 1847-53-54. He was con- sulting physician of the Tewksl)ury almshouse from the time of its foundation until he died, December 13, 1865. In 1S63 he was Lieu- tenant-Governor of Massachusetts. -At the time of his death he was senior warden of St. John's Episcopal Church. Lowell. His wife was Hannah, daughter of Jose]ih and Deborah Hinckley, of Marblehead. Their sons were Major I. F. Huntington, of Boston, and Rev. Wil- liam R. Huntington, D. D., for man)- years rector of Grace Church, New York Cit}- ; a daughter was Mrs. Josiah Parsons Cooke, of Cam- bridge, wife of the professor of chemistry at Harvard University. Nathaniel Wright defeated Dr. Huntington in the ma}-oralty con- test of 1842, running as a Whig of anti-corporation affiliations. He was born at Sterling, F"ebruary 13, 1785, was graduated from Harvard College and was admitted to the bar in 181 1. He is remembered as an excellent lawyer and an honest, able administrator, a man of few words and averse to display and ostentation. He died on November 5, 1858. In i8-'6 Lowell elected Colonel Jefferson Bancroft ma^or. He was twice reelected in successive years. This admirable citizen was born at Warwick in 1803, of a family that has had many eminent mem- bers since it was founded in this country by Lieutenant Thomas Ban- croft, born in England in 1822. In 1824 Jefferson Bancroft came to East Chelmsford from Boston via the packet boat on the Middlesex canal and secured work as a factory operative. Within a few \'ears he had become an overseer for carding on the Appleton. In 1826 he married Harriet, daughter of Amos Bradley, M. D., of Dracut. In June, 183!. he began a long service as deputy sheriflf of Middlesex comity, an office which he held imtil 1890. with the exception of the years 1853-60. In the last two years of the town of Lowell he was collector of taxes. In 1840-41 he was in the common council and in T842-43 in the l)oard of aldermen. Between 1844 and 1846 he was chief engineer of the fire department. He twice represented Lowell in the Legislature and held various other positions of responsibility. In 1836 he was chosen adjutant of the Fifth Regiment, Massachusetts z-^z HISTORY OF LO\\ELL \'oliinteer Militia, and was aft^'rwards its culonel. The cummunity had 11(1 more useful niciubcr than Colonel Bancroft and niine more uni- versally respected. He died at Tyngsborough, January 3, 1890. On the "Citizens' ticket'' Josiah Bowers French was chosen mayor of the city in 1849-50. The community thus secured the services of an able and far-seeing financier whci was responsible for the upbuilding of several important enterjiriscs. Mr. French came in 1824 to East Chelmsford from Billerica, where he was born December 13, 1799. He had just been appointed deputy sherifif of Middlesex county, an office which he held until 1830. He was in the common comicils of 1836 and 1842; was in the Legislatures of 1835 ^""J '^^i ; was chief of the fire department in 1840-41, and from 1S44 to 1847 was one of the county commissioners. His business connections were many. He was one of the prom<_iters (if the Central Bridge Company, with which he was associated until the property was taken over by the city. Be- tween 1831 and 1846 he managed stage-coach lines plying between Lowell and Concord, New Hamjjshire, and other northern points, ffe was active in securing the establishment of the Lowell and Appleton National banks and the City Institution for Savings. For a time he was presitlent (if the Appleton I'ank. In 1851 he was elected president (if the Northern New Hampshire railroad. With his l)rother, Captain Walter French, he l.iuilt a raihxiad in Ohio. Fur fourteen years he was agent of the Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton and Woolen Manufac- turing Company. In politics he was a Democrat ; in religion a Uni- tarian, and in every respect a burn leader (jf men. It is recalled that "he was a man of fine personal lieariug — tall, erect and commanding — giving the impression to one wIki met him that he was nn ordinary man." He died August 21, 187(1. James H. B. A}-er, Imrn at llaxerhill in 17S8. was elected mayor in 1850. He came to East Chelmsford in 1823 to take a p(.)sition with the L(_icks and Canals Ciim])any. He was thus emplnyed until 11846, when he went into the lumber business in partnership \\ith Ibiratio Fletcher. Sh(irtl\- after the [leridd of his mayoralty he retiu'iied to the Locks and Canals Company as paymaster. He died June 7, 1864, remembered as a man of high personal integrity and good business ability. Sewell G. Mack, born at Wilton, New Hampshire, November 8, i(Si3. was mayor in 1853-54, a rejjresentative of the fine Scotch-Irish stock that settled several tnwnshijis of Snuthern New Hampshire. His }-outh and early manh(.)od were passed at Amherst, New Hamp- shire, fr(im which town he was sent as delegate to the National Con- ventiiin at Baltimore that nominated William llenrv Harrison for the presidency. In 1840 he came to Lowell to take u]) the l)usiness of a lirother who had just died. The firm of Cushing <& Mack, later S. G. THE ANTE-liELLUM CITY 223 Mack & Cuni])an}-, was a 1)usiness landmark duwn to 1S87. Mr. Mack was closely associated with many enterprises of public service and business. He and John Wright became interested in gas lighting and organized the Lowell Gas Light Company, of which Mr. Mack was president for many _\ears. In 1842 he was chosen a director of the Railroad Bank. Later he became president of the Five Cent Savings Bank. From its incorporation he was a director of the Stony Brook railroad. He was one of the incorporators of the Old Ladies' Home, a director in the Lowell Dispensary and for some years the "citizens' trustee" of the Corporation Hospital. Besides serving as mayor he was at various times a coimcilman, alderman, school committeeman and representative in the Legislature. For fifty years he was a deacon of Kirk Street Congregational Church, of which he w-as one of the founders. Ambrose Lawrence became mayor in 1855. Coming from the same emigrant ancestor with the Lawrences of Groton, he was born at Boscawen. New Hampshire, in 1S16. At twent3--one he took a posi- tion as machinist in the Suffolk Manufacturing Company. Three years later he entered upon the stiuh' of dentistry, for which he had natural capacit}'. His office from 1S39 onward was near the old postoffice. He prospered in his profession, in which he became a recognized expert, at one time holding a dental professorship in Boston. His fine resi- dence in John street, built in 185,2, later became the Home for Young Women and Children. Dr. Lawrence was much interested in prob- lems of local government. He entered the common council in 1849 and the board of aldermen in 1S51. He died in 1893. Stei)hen Mansur, who was mayor in 1857, was born at Temple, New Hamjishire, August 25, 1799. As already related, he came to Lowell througli his sjiecial knowledge of canal construction, as he had served on the Erie canal. He represented the citv in the Legislatures of 1836 and 1850. He was in the city council in 1836 and 1839, and in the board of aldermen in 1840, 1847. and 1853. He was appointed one of the inspectors of the Tewksl)ury .\lmshouse, when that institution was created in 1853. He attended the First Baptist Church, of which he was long a deacon. James Cook, mayor of Lowell in 1859, was born at Preston, Con- necticut, October 4, 1794. He learned the clothier's trade in his father's fulling mill. In 1830 he came to Lowell as agent of the Middlesex com])any. Under his direction this company became remarkably suc- cessful, leaving dividends as high as thirty-three per cent. Mr. Cook was subsequently agent of the Winooski Mills, at Burlington, \'er- mont, and the Uncas Mills, of Norwich, Connecticut. After he re- turned to T-owell he engaged in the insurance business. He was twice a member of the common council and was elected to the mayoralty b}' the so-called "American" ])arty. He died April 10, 1884. 224 HISTORY OF LOWELL Under the municipal go\ernment authorized by the charter of 1836, Lowell began proin[itiy to Iniild up the departments for protec- tion of life and property, for the cultural advancement of the whole people, which it is a prime function of the modern city to administer. The city at this time hafl twenty schools, with an average daily attendance of 1,370; high, 75; grammar, 550; primary, 745. There were thirteen churches ; two national banks, the Lowell and the Rail- road, and one savings bank, the Lowell Institution for Savings. The population was 17.633, of whom the aliens were 2,661 and the col H. Carrin, 1851; Edwin L. Shedd, 1852-54; Samuel Mil- ler. 1855: William H. Clenence, 1859. Court Houses and Jails Before the Civil War — The first court house in Lowell was the old market building, in Market street, erected by co(")perati(jn of cit\" anrl county in 1837. .\l>out t84() the count\'s interest in this structure was sold to the city for $10,000. The court house on Gorham street, predecessor of the present luonuniental structure, was built m iN4() at a cost of about .$38,000. In 1855 the North Registry was established, an act of great convenience to the city and the surrounding towns. All the records relating to this end of the countx-, covering a period of more than 200 years, were copied under a special statute from the originals in Candiridge, THE ANTE-BELLUM LTrV 227 The building of the court liouse in Lowell, it should be noted, was a marked step in the direction of centralization of legal business of northern Middlesex county. It meant that Lowell became more than ever before a desirable place for residence of able lawyers, who con- tributed a marked element in the professional and social life of the place. The improving facilities for quick transportation by rail were, in fact, rapidl}" jnitting the country lawyer out of business. The jail on Thorndike street, still one of the conspicuous institu- tions of the city, was built in 1852-53, after designs by James H. Rand. The architecture is truthfully, t.nd perhaps a little sarcastically, de- scribed Ijv Cowley as "semi-Gothic, differing in many resjiects from any other structure of the kind." Functionally, withal, it embodied what at the time of its erection were the latest and best ideas in penol- ogy. As erected the jail was 123 feet long with a width of 90 feet on the front and 54 in the rear. It was four stories high, with octagonal towers at each of the front corners of the main edifice. The scheme provided for entire separation of the quarters for men and women. There were 90 cells for men, 12 for women, two hospitals and four rooms for temporary confinement. Criticism of the cost of this jail was not wanting. 'I'here were those, indeed, who seemed to find that offenders against the law were more magnificenth- housed in Lowell than were the great majority of the law-abiding. A certain caustic chronicler wrote: "March 20, 1858. the new jail on Thorndike street was first occupied. This mag- nificent structure cost $150,000 and contains 102 cells. If the annual rent of this building should be reckoned at 10 per cent, of its cost and if every cell were constantly occupied, the average rental of a cell would be $132. When to this is added the average cost of each occu- pant for food, salaries of officers, etc.. the very lowest annual expense to the county of each prisoner is $400. Thus a scoundrel, who thinks his family of six persons fortunate if they can afford to occupy a tene- ment whose annual rental is $50, finds, when he is so fortunate as to get into this magnificent jail, the county lavishes on him alone an ex- pense which, if bestowed upon his large and suffering family, would enable them to live in almost lu.xury. To squander money thus ap- prcjaches very near a crime." Judges in Lowell's First Decades — The first judge of the Lowell Police Court was the Hon. Joseph Locke, a man of fine humanitarian instincts and one of the leaders in the temperance cause. He had li\ed in Billerica, where the story was told of his having been elected to an office, the incumbent of which was expected by custom to treat his constituents in celebration of the victory. Mr. Locke refused to Iniy the drinks, but turned over an equi\alent amount of money to the school authorities, with instructions to buy school books for those 228 HISTORY OF LOWELL children whose parents had difficulty in providing them. This noble jurist administered justice in Lowell for thirteen years. Judge Nathan Crosby, who succeeded Judge Locke, was born at Sandwich, New Hampshire, in 1798. After graduation from Dart- mouth College in 1820, he settled in Newburyport to practice law. He became interested at the same time in the temperance movement, in behalf of which he lectured throughout New England. In 1843 he came to Lowell through his connection, mentioned elsewhere, with the purchase of water rights in the New Hampshire lakes. As judge of the Police Court during a term of service covering thirty-nine years, he confirmed the traditinn of di£;nity, humanity and uniform courtesy which was established by Judge Locke, and which has been continued liy his successiirs. Judges TTndley and Enright. Making a Modern Fire Department — The fire department which had been organized under the town was rai>idl\- developed in efficiency and reliability under the new government. Fires, fortunately, were few in the first vears of the city. In 1840, for exaiuple, there were but six alarms. A few older residents still remember the "Protection Company" which o]5erated for about ten years. Owen describes it as follows : 'Tn 1840 also the 'Protection Cnmiiany' was formed. This company was composed principally of business irien, and its primary object was to protect personal property in case of fire, not only froiu the fire but from plunder when remii\-ed from the street. The memlx-rs were pro- vided w^ith a screw-driver, bed key and a bag with which to prosecute their important part in saving property. Being unprovided w'ith any means of fighting fire, they were forced to beat a hasty retreat when the premises became uncomfortably warm, and do police duty in the streets. The company was com|)osed of some of the most influential business men of the period, and became an efficient feature of the de- partment. It continued in existence until 1850, when it disbanded. Stephen Mansur, mayor of the city in 1857, was the first foreman." Chief engineers of the fire de|)artment down to i860 were : Charles L. Tilden. 1836-38: Jonathan M. Marston, 1838-39; Joseph Butterfield, 1839-40; Josiah E. French. 1840-42; Stephen Cushing, 1842-43; Jona- than M. Marston, 1843-44 ; Jefiferson Bancroft, 1844-46; Aaron H. Sher- man, 1846-50; Hcirace Howard, 1850-53; Lucius A. Ctitler, 1853-54; Weare Clififord, 1854-60. The Introduction of Running Water — The problem of a pure water supply was one which agitated the authorities of Lowell from the first vears of the incorporation. In 1838 G. M. Dexter, represent- ing the citv, made a survey of Tyng's and Long ponds, to the north- west, both which have a water level that is about sixty feet abo\'e the river at Pawtucket dam. THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 229 This investigator's estimate was that the former pond might sup- ply the city with about 1,200,000 gallons of water per day. No action was taken, however, and the community continued to draw water from the canals by permission of the Locks and Canals Company and from prixate wells until 1848, when W. E. Worthen, under instruction from the city council took up the Tyng's pond proposal and reported ad- versely upon it. lie found that much loss of water must be forecasted in bringing it from this distance and that a considerable portion of the city would be above the level of the pond, necessitating pumps and a high surface reservoir. He was doubtful, furthermore, about the quan- tity (if water awiilable. "The outlet of Tyng's Pond," he wrote, "was delivering a few days ago only I ' j cubic feet per second, and the pond was said not to be rising." With Mr. Worthen's adverse report was ended the scheme of find- ing citv water in one of the local ponds. Soon after this a commis- sion on water supply was appointed, consisting of Oliver M. Whipple, JefTerson Bancroft, John Avery, David Dana. Otis L. Allen and Thomas Ho]ikinson. This committee retained Mr. \\'orthen as engi- neer. Through him a report was secvired from the famous chemist, Samuel D. Dana, recommending the use of the Merrimack river water. "Its amount and cjuality of salts, organic and mineral matter indicate that it is not less pure than that used by the inhabitants of Philadel- phia and New York from the Schuylkill and Hudson rivers." Out of this o])inion ensued the construction of a water works system under authority of a legislative act of 1855. The reservoir on Lvnde's hill, Belvidere, it should lie oljserved, was not projected as a public enterprise. It was built in 1848 by the manufacturing companies of the city at the urgence of Mr. Francis, engineer. Situated on a hill about a mile and a half from cit)- hall, the top of the em])ankment stands about 190 feet alcove the water level in the up])er canals. The depth is eighteen feet, with a depth of water of twehe feet, giving an effective height of 184 feet. The enclosure is 174 feet square at the top and 102 feet at the bottom. When filled it carries 1,201,641 gallons of water. The original object was to supply water in case of a fire occurring when the canals were drawn off, to feed the corpnration boilers and tor use in the boarding houses. The Establishment of a City Library — The Lowell City Library-, one of the must beneficent of mimicipal institutions, dates from May 20, 1844, when it was founded by enactment of the common council. It was one of the pioneer examples in New England of a lil)rary sup- ported out of taxation for the benefit of all citizens. This library, now so imposing that it greatly impresses all visitors, started with slender resources, for it was built upon no large collections previously formed, nor was it at the outset privately endowed. Some help, however, was 230 HISTORY OF LOWELL availalile from outbide. It ha])|)cned that in the middle forties the Commonwealth of Massachusetts was endeavoring by a system of subsidies to encourage the several cities and towns to form what were then called "school libraries." Lowell was entitled to about $1,200 from this source. The new library was accordingly opened under the designation of the "City School Library." It was assigned a room in City Hall. Books were first drawn on February 11, 1845, each person paying annual dues of fifty cent.- for the privilege. To the liljrarian- ship was chosen Josiah Hubbard, who served for thirteen years. A private circulating library was p'.irchased soon after the opening. The period of great expansion of library facilities began after the Civil War. Central Bridge From Private to Public Ownership — A complete narrative of the relations of the Central Bridge Corporation to the citv of Lowell and the town of Dracut, to which Centralville belonged until 1851, would require almost unlimited space. The proprietors of this bridge, already an important artery of traffic, were shrewd men and not above playing the game of politics. They coped cleverly with an increasing public impatience; they finally had to yield, as so many other bridge companies must, to a demand that general taxation rather than private toll gathering should pay f<.)r the construction and main- tenance of bridges in the city of Lowell. The story of the Central Bridge Company was told in consider- able detail in Alfred Oilman's paper of November 8, 1882. In the first days of the new city, that is between 1836 and 1842, there may have been an undercurrent of popular dissatisfaction regarding the cost of crossing the river, but of this feeling, if it existed. Mr. Gilman found no documentary evidence at all. In the last-named year Dracut called a meeting "to see what measures the town will take to reduce the toll on Central Bridge." Repeated meetings thereafter were held to dis- cover, if ])ossible, the actual cost of operating the bridge. It was shown til the town that the pro]irietors' dividends had averaged more than nine ])er cent. Rebuilding of Central bridge, meantime, had become necessary. On March 23, 1843, ''^t- Legislature jjassed an act permitting recon- struction. The city of Lowell accepted this act on A])ril 5 following; Dracut, after much ])olitical maneu\'ering, on Ajjril 3, 1843. Three years later a question of the athisaltility of annexing Cen- tralville til Ldwell was raised. 1 he city at that time evidently did not want a su''urb on the north side of the river, for the vote of December (). 1830, stimd 831 in fax'or and 1.153 upposed. Lowell, hdwever, at last "struck hands with Dracut in intent to free Central Bridge." On May 21, 1853, an act was passed authorizing THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 231 the city of Lowell and the town of Dractit t(_) Iniy Central bridge "on such terms as might be agreed." The proprietors, howexer, had no intention of "agreeing" and in 1854 the city petitioned that the Supreme Court of the State be author- ized to declare what amount might properly be paid. This application wa.s opposed by the bridge company, which had retained Rufus Choate. The city was ably represented by A. P. Bonney and T. H. Sweetser. The result was an enactment whose wording was drawn up by Mr. Bonney: "An act to pro\ide a mode of opening Central Bridge free of toll." Not until 1862 was the issue finally settled and the obnoxious toll lifted. As municipal ad\'antages increased and as population l)egan to spread into the suburban areas, it was natural to expect that a desire for annexation to Lowell would be expressed by people living just beyond the city limits. Tlie annexation of Belvidere under the town government has been chronicled. It was not many years before an- other residential village was clamoring for admission. The Annexation of Centralville — Some eight years before annexa- tion finallv was granted the inhabitants of Centralville, as shown bv a n(.)tice in the ''Lowell Courier" of Eebruary 7, 1S43, petitioned as fol- lows : Respectfully represent your petitioners that they are inhal)itants of that part of Dracutt, in the County of Middlesex, which is known by the name of "Centralville." That their business, feelings and inter- ests connect them much more closely with the city of Lowell than with the town of Dracutt ; — That many of them do business in Lowell, and all of them are wholly dependent on that City for their prosper- ity; — That "Centralville" is separated from the heart of the City of Lowell only by the Merrimack River, and is very intimately connected with the City : — That the remotest part of "Centralville" is not more than half a mile distant from the Citv Hall, the Courthouse and the Post Office of Lowell. \\ herefore, as a matter of pul)lic and pri\'ate convenience, your jietitioners pray that said "Centralville," which is now a part of said Dracutt, and contains less than 300 acres of land, may be set off from said Dracutt, and be annexed to and become a [jart of the City of Lowell in said County — tn wit : Beginning at a point at the thread of the Merrimack River, on the lint' which separates the City of Lowell from Tewksbury, thence running N. 17 deg., 30 N. E., to a Hemlock tree on the north bank of said River; thence running N. 8 deg., 15 m. \\'., sixty-seven chains and fift\- links; thence running N. 39 deg., W. seventy-five chains nearly, till it reaches the thread of said Alerrimack Ri\er below Pawtucket Fall ; thence turning and running easterly, fol- li.iwing the thread of said River to the jjoint of beginning. This petition was signed I)y Joseph Bradley and seventy-nine others, representing for the most part families who had built resi- dences on Christian Hill 232 HISTORY OF LOWELL The original petition was not granted and the agitation continued. Finall}- in 1N51 Centralvilie was annexed to the city, not so much through any anxiety of Lowell jieople, it would apjiear, to extend the municipal hounds as of the people on the further side of the river to secure the benefits of municipal imprc ivemcnts. On Ueccmlier 9. 1^50. a referendum was sulnnitted to the voters of Lowell in the following terms: "Ls it expedient that the part of Dracut called Centralvilie be annexed tcj the City of Lowell, according to the Petition of L. G. Howe and others?" The vote stood: Yeas, 851 ; nays, 1,153. Despite this expression of popular reluctance to assume responsi- bility for this suburb a bill before the Legislature was passed to be engrossed on February 27, icS5i, and was duly signed by the Governor. Thus ended the long campaign of the Centralvilie residents for annexa- tion. Their section of the city grew rapidly after the bridge tolls were remitted, for it is hardly inferior to Belvidere in point of convenience and natural attractiveness. One of the most famous real estate de\'elopnients of the forties was that of "Ayer's New City," projected in 1847 by Daniel Ayer. This gentleman purchased a large tract of sandy plain near Hale's brook, laid out some streets and lots and inaugurated a monster auc- tion sale, inciting" attendance by promise of a barbecue. The ox was duly roasted and "the occasion drew a crowd of peo])Ie but the unsa- vory smell spoiled their ai)petites." Mr. Ayer later went through bank- ruptcy, owing money to a large list of creditors. He eventtially, how- ever, paid every cent for which he was morally liable. His venttire is, of course, still per])etuated in the name of A}er. Dedication of the Fair Grounds — A landmark, which has now dis- api)carctl, was created in the snuthern jjart of the city in i860, when the Middlesex North Agricultural Societ}- on June 18 dedicated its building at the fair grounds. This reservation, the scene of festi\'ities that for half a century brought residents of all the surrounding towns to Lowell, had been made possible by ])urchase of land from the Bos- ton tK: Lowell railroad. The building was one formerly used by the L(.iwell Bleachery, which was moved over to Gorham street. In it was installed the headquarters of th<' Massachusetts .\gricultural Library Association, with 140 members and an initial collection of about 275 books on subjects connected with farming. The fair gniunds. thus set ofif, became unexpectedly useful in within a few nuiuths, fur they were rented to the United States Government as a training cani]> under the name of Camp Chase. Here se\'eral thousand men fr^ni nurth Middle- .sex county were prepared to go tn the front. Postmasters of the New City — The National go\'ernnient most closely touched ante-bellum Lowell through the postal service. The local i)ostmastershij) in 1837 was gi\en by President Tyler THE ANTE-BELLU:\I CITY 22,Z to Jacob Rohbins (1798-1885), formerly of Harvard. The choice was fortunate. Mr. Robbins. who was a graduate of Westford Academy, was a scholarly, broad-minded man and well equipped for public serv- ice. He was, incidentally, one of the first citizens of Lowell to interest himself in forming a collection of objects of fine art. His incimibency of the postmastership lasted four years. Stephen S. Seavey was appointed postmaster by President Polk in 1841. His salary in the four years of his term sometimes ran as high as $1,800, which was considered phenomenal. Alfred Oilman, whose reminiscences have been frequentl\- drawn U])on for the purposes of this history, was chosen postmaster in 1841; by President Taylor. His salary was fixed at $2,ocx). President Pierce in 1853 appointed Thomas P. Goodhue to the ofilice. This gentleman died Octolier I, 1853. He was succeeded by Fisher Ames Hildreth, who held the office during the Pierce and Bu- chanan administrations and who was in many respects one of the important men of his city. He was of the Dracut Hildreths, whose prominence in the district now Centralville has been recorded. In the seventh generation from Sergeant Richard Hildreth, he was born in Dracut, February 5. i8i8, the onlv son of Dr. Israel and Dolly Jones Hildreth. In his native town he held practically all the offices open to a yoimg man. including that of representative in the General Coiu't. In 1845 he removed to Lowell, where he studied law for a time and then undertook the publication of a newspaper, "The Republican."' Later, besides this publication, he acquired the tri-weekly "-\d\ertiser'' and weekly "Patriot." which were merged into the "Lowell Patriot." The two papers were imder his ownership and management until their suspension in 1863. Among many reminders of Mr. Hildreth's activi- ties of this time is the Hildreth building in Merrimack street, built on the site of the Lowell Museum, incorporated as a stock company in 1850, with Air. Hildreth as one of its directors. President Pierce's postmaster was one of the most enthusiastic Democrats of ante-bellum Lowell, and a leading personality in the coalition movement of 1850. Several Lowell Congressmen — The Congressional district of which the city of Lowell was an increasingly important centre continued until 1843 to be represented by Caleb Ctishing, of Newbury port, a Whig. The reason for this statesman's retirement has been set forth by Cowley in his "History of Lowell," in a passage which is so redolent with the political afflatus of the time that it merits reprinting: "When the Whig State Convention, in 1842, under the dictation of Abbott Lawrence, jiassed their stupid resolution of 'eternal separation' from the administration of John Tyler, Mr. Gushing, following the lead of Mr. Webster, refused to concur. Thereupon various hungry politi- cians who were not worthy to black Mr. Cushing's shoes, combined 234 HISTORY OF LOWELL to ml) him nf the* confidence of his constituents l)y an active and unscrupulous tise of the coward's favorite weapon — calumny. Weak- ened ]>}■ these nefarious tactics, Mr. Gushing retired from Congress and accepted the mission to China. It has been common to sneer at Mr. Cushing as one who Tvlerized. P)tit as between Mr. Cushing and his adversaries in the controversy of 1S42, the calm verdict of history must clearly be given to him — Mr. Cushing saw clearly and declared franklx- that to follow tlie petulant policy dictated by Mr. Clay was to waste life in a vain chase after bubbles. Considering with what blind jK-rsistence this fatal policy was jnirsued, and with what disastrous results, it cannot be wondered that Mr. Cushing. with his broader statesmanship and catholicity of feeling, held himself aloof until his qtiondam friends had achieved their ruin ; and afterward, when the old issues had become obsolete, and new issues had arisen, he sought a more congenial ])lace in the Democratic party. Of his services as Colonel and Brigadier-General during the Mexican War we shall not here speak. Nor is this the place to dwell upon his subseqtient career as Mayor of Newhurypurt. Representative in the Legislature, Judge of the Supreme Court, Attorney-General of the L'nited States, Presi- dent of the Charleston Convention of iSfio, Commissioner to Codify the United States Statutes, etc." In 1843 Amos Abbott succeeded Caleb Cushing as Lowell's rep- resentative in Congress. He was described as "a good, clever man \\'ho had achieved distinguished success as keeper of a grocer's shop at the cross-roads in Andover ; but was utterly insignificant in Con- gress." He was, nevertheless, twice reelected. James II. Duncan in iS4() became congressman in Mr. .Xbhott's stead. He served two terms. Tajjpan Wentworth. \\'hig, of Lnwell, and Henry Wilson, Coali- tionist, were rival candidates in the closely contested election of 1852. Cowley afterwards \\rote : "The tactics used to defeat General Wilson had better not be scrutinized too closelv. His defeat, however, was one of the most fortunate events in a life remarkabl}' fidl of \icissitudes. Had he been elected to tlic House in 1852 he would hardly have been a candidate for the Senate in 1855. and the chair then \acated by Edward Everett would probabU- have been filled by Marshall \\ Wilder or Henry J. Gardner." Mr. Wentworth, whose ser\-ice at Washington lasted hut one term, was the first resident of Lowell to go to Congress. He was born ill Dover. New Ham])shire, February 24. 1802, and died in Lowell, June 12, 1875. It will be recalled that he was on the committee which secured the city's municipal charter and that he was elected to the first Common Council. ( )f this board he \vas suljsecpiently president. In 1848--IIJ he \\ as in the State Senate. After his term at Washingtcin he THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 235 served again in tlie Legislature, sometimes in one liranch and some- times in another until 1866, when he retired from public life. In 1855 Chauncey L. Knapp, another Lowell man, represented the district in Congress. ]\Ir. Knapp was born at Berlin, \'ermont. Feb- ruary 26, I Sex), where his father, the Hon. Abel Knapp, was an honored citizen holding many offices including that of Judge of Probate of Jefferson (now Washington) county. Chauncey C. Knapp learned the printer's trade and did editorial work at, successively, St. Johnsbury, Boston and Montpelier. Between 1836 and 1840 he was Secretary of State of \'ermont. Then, through his opposing Henry Clay, the ^^'hig candidate, he Inst many i)f his ])olitical friends and was defeated for reelectiiin. Soon thereafter he left \"ermont and came to Lowell, taking u[) work as a journeyman printer. While at the case he became acquainted with John Greenleaf Whittier, who advised him to remain in a growing city. Mr. Knapp's subsequent experiences in editing and ])ublishing newspapers in Lowell are related elsewhere. He developed through his extensive jotirnalistic training into a facile writer and close student of ecoiKjmic and political qtiestions. This line of interest made him a very valuable Congressman. In 1859, just before the outbreak of the Ci\il War, Hon. Charles R. Train (1817-1885) of Framingham, was elected to Congress from the district. He was a son of Rev. Charles Train of that town, a graduate of Brown University and an able lawyer. Abraham Lincoln's Visit to Lowell — A distinguished visitor of the year following the Mexican War, though his greatness was. of course, not yet fully recognized by Lowell people, was Abraham Lin- coln, of Illinois, then an orator of the Whig party. A reminiscence of the martyr President's one appearance at the Spindle City was con- tributefl by Judge S. P. Hadley at the Lincoln Memorial meeting of the Lowell Historical Association in February, ily with the chairman of the central committee. Hon. Linus I hihl. mi Kirk street: possibly with Hon. llomer Hartlett, who resided in the same block with Air. Child. Whether he remained o\er Simda\- 1 do ni.it know. The industrial acti\ities on which the political and social life of Lowell was liased were already well established when the city became a town. Thev underwent, in the next quarter century, no extraordi- nar_\- expansion Init r.ither a steady growth. Some new industries sought the city. More would doulitless have done so if it could have been foreseen that the supply of temporary labor fr(jm the nearby farms would presently cease and that a ]iermanent factory popula- tion would result. Lowell was weak, and to a certain extent still is weak, in industries employing men operatives. It is now generally understood that a factory community prospers best if opportunities are made for employment ut of the house." As he had already had some training in mechanical work under his father, wdio was a mine railroad superintendent in South Wales, the emigrant yLiuth applied for a jiosition with Major George W. W'his- tler, who was then engaged with Alajor William Gibbs McNeill in Iniilding the Shore Line Railroad between New York and Boston. He made such an impression of competence that when Major Whistler shortly afterwards went from Stonington to Lowell to take charge of the machine shop, then controlled by the Locks and Canals Company, young Francis was invited to go with him as his assistant. The stay of the W'histler faniil}- in the house in Worthen street now occupied by the Lowell Art Association was shiirt (though in that time was born there the distinguished author of "The Gentle Art of Making Enemies"). When in 1837 Major Whistler accejited a c(.)m- mission to go to St. Petersburg to build a railroad connecting the two Russian capitals, his assistant, though only twenty-two years old, was prcimoted to be chief engineer of the Proprietors of Locks and Canals on the Merrimack River. This position he held continuously until 1885, a period of forty-eight }ears. In 1845 he was also given the title of "agent" of the pmprietors. In 1837 Mr. F^rancis married Sarah W. Brownell. daughter of George FSrownell. then sujierintendent of the machine shop, and thus was bound by family ties, never broken, to this jjart of New England. "As agent of the Propriettirs," writes Mr. Herschel, "Mr. Francis was in position to design and urge the constructiiin of imjDroyements to the |)ropert\- placed in his charge; and we thu> Inul him designing the Northern Canal the \-ery next year after his appointment, in 1846." "This canal," continues Mr. Herschel, "now taken as a matter of course, like so many engineering works once they are done and put into operation, was a most notable impro\'ement to the water power created by means of the old navigation canal, originally built to carry boats around Pawtucket Falls. It was built wholly or i)rincipally by day's labor, in the most durable manner ; it cost, with accompanying work, some $650,000, a very large sum for those days, and a very large THE ANTE-BELLURE CITY 239 sum for an engineer only some 30 odd years old to ha\ e the responsi- bilit}' for : and it was built within the estimated cost. During its serv- ice of 60 years it is doubtful if any one has ever in any of its features found fault with it." The Northern canal, it hardly need be added, made it possible to get about the maximum of power from the ordi- nary stages of the river. .\ strain of dry humor which was in Mr. Francis' nature comes to the surface in Mr. Herschel's story oi the inception of his plan to fore- stall tloods which might have descended by way of the new canal. .■\n old man living near the falls one day called the engineer's attention to a rock in the ri\-er lied just below the dam and said that in boyhood he well remembered a freshet which completely submerged this rock. Asked what year that occvn-red he stated that it was either 1785 or 16S5 — he could not exactly remember which. The cjuaintly illiterate remark led Mr. Francis to consider very seriouslv the possibility that at some future date the river might go much higher than it ever had done since the comjianies first came to Lowell : \\'hat had been was likely to occur again, and while property losses by flood could not perhaps be heavy in 1785 or 1685, yet they must decidedly be guarded against in 1850, when large investments in mills and machinery and a city had gathered below the head of Paw- tucket Falls. And so he built a new and safer guard gate in as simple and economical manner as possible. Merely a huge panel, 27 feet wide by 25 feet high, built of sticks of timber the like of which have long since ceased to float down the Merrimack, suspended in grooves over the canal lock by an iron strap, so that boats could pass under it : the strap to be cut so as to let fall the big gate whenever occasion for its use should arise. As the great gate hung there, suspended between heaven and earth, it was a marked feature in the landscape, and was promptly christened "Francis' Folly" by the populace. More than that, it would probably have fared hard with the reputation of the young engineer if 10 or, say, 20 years should have elapsed before the freshet of 65 years previous came to be repeated ; but fortune favored. In 1852, only two years after the building of the guard gate, there came the equal of the f )ld river man's freshet of 67 years before : the iron strap was cut, the huge gate fell and shut off a torrent that but for it would have caused incalculable damage to Lowell and Lowell industries. It mav be added that after this flofid leading citizens of the city, headed b}- J. B. French, desiring, as Meader expresses it, "to testify in some tangible form their appreciation of his wise forecast, procured a testimonial, suitably inscribed, which they presented to Mr. Francis." The river on the morning of Ajjril 22, 1852, rose to the unprece- dented height of seventeen feet and six inches. .'\s a precautionary measure stones were placed on Pawtucket bridge. The Concord river J40 HISTORY OF LOWELL bridges were likewise barricaded. The flood affected downtown Lowell. Davidson, Howe and Wall streets, in Belvidere, ran three feet of water. The barroom of the City Hotel was flooded to the level of the counters. Cellars in the lower parts of Centralville were filled, and many families were forced to take refuge on Christian Hill. Several of the corporation yards were under water and the lower r(.)oms of the mills were threatened. The jireniises of Col.nirn Blood, in Pawtucketville, were deep with water and he was ol:)liged to save his oxen by swimming them to higher land. Although ninety-three years old, Mr. Blood had never seen the river so high. The work which Mr. Francis did on the Merrimack in this era was summarized in his book called "Lowell Hydraulic Experiments," published in 185S. This went through several editions and became a text-book of hydraulic engineering practice throughout the civilized world. It led to the election of the author to every engineering society of consequence. Directly supplementing Mr. Francis' studies, which led to the construction of the Northern canal, was a plan of using lakes Winne- pesaukee, Squam and Newfound as reservoirs in which surplus water could be stored in spring to increase the flow of the Merrimack in summer. This project was devised and put into operation when the city was about ten years old. Even in 1840 the irregularities of flow in the river had became a source of troulde to the manufacturing companies. To Nathan Crosby, a young lawyer from Newburyport, afterwards judge of the Lowell Police Court, were due both the original suggestion and the execution of the design for this very essentia! scheme of conservatiim nf "white coal." Judge Crosbv, according to his pul)lished reminiscences, was one day talking with Samuel Lawrence, of Boston, in regard to a mill in which both were interested at Meredith bridge, the second dam on the river below Lake \\'innepesaukce. In conversation he threw out the idea that the manufacturing companies of the lower Merrimack ought to gain control of the lake and convert it into a storage reservoir as a means of i)revcnting shortage of water during the midsummer droughts. The suggestion was received seriously and for some muntlis Judge Crosby was in correspondence with ]\lr. Lawrence regarding it. Then presently in 1845 John Nesmith, who had become interested in the new city of Lawrence, called one day upon Mr. Crosby and gave him carte l^Iaiichc tn buy water ]50wers and outlets in the upper Merrimack valley and to draw upon Samuel Lawrence for whatever funds were needed. This commission was gladly undertaken. "I spent much THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 241 time," wrote Judge Crosby, "in examining the shores of the hikes and Days to ascertain what low lying farming lands would he drained or flooded by lowering or raising dams, and what property on the river would be aiTected in value by withdrawing or rushing along the water as the demands at Lowell might require. It was also desirable to make our widespread purchases as simultaneously as possible, so that the fair market price of the propert}' might not be disturbed. Careful examination of the value of each piece of property was, therefore, made and the asking price ascertained so that future complaint might not be made that the vendor had not received the market value of his property. When the preliminaries had been settled, men were placed at different points and deeds obtained on the same day, or within a few days of the most important places. * * * These purchases were on Lake W'innepesaukee, both bays in Meredith and Sanljornton, both Squams in Holderness and Newfound Pond in Hebron. * * * Some three to five feet of more than 100 square miles of surplus water are now at the command of the Lowell and Lawrence mills — a holding back of spring floods for use in the summer months to the great bene- fit of every mill between the lakes and the sea." The total capacity of the Winnepesaukee storage basin, which stands as a monimient to Judge Crosby's foresight and initiative, has been figured b_\" the United States Geological Survey at eight billion cubic feet. The lake, at capacity, covers an area of 183 square miles. The references to the city of Lawrence in Judge Crosby's narra- ti\ e, it may be said in passing, are evidence of the identity of interests between these adjacent communities on the Merrimack. It should be noted that John Nesmith, besides being the originator of the Lowell School of Belvidere, was the real founder of the city at the mouth of the Spicket. "As early as 1836," says Meader, "Mr. Nesmith, in com- pany with Daniel Saunders, Esq., had made j)urchases of the land adjacent to the falls on either side of the river and had secured a char- ter for damming." The panic of T837 interrupted the schenae for utiliz- ing the power at this point in the river, and nothing was done until 1844, when Mr. Nesmith secured a renewal of his charter and suc- ceeded in interesting several Boston capitalists, with results that are evident in the city of to-day. With the Merrimack thus used to capacity, Lowell industries were generally prosperous along lines alread}- indicated. The Locks and Canals Company continued to be a dominant factor in the life of the city even though a reorganization of the company occurred in 1845, under which it sold off much of its land and turned over its business of making machinery to a new corporation to be knuwn as the Lowell Machine Shop, with capitalization of $600,000. U-16 242 HISTORY OF LOWELL Passing of the Middlesex Canal — The effect of railroad cimipeti- tion, at tirst regarded l>v many people as unlikeK- to injure the traffic uf the Middlesex canal, began to be felt seriously as the road's facili- ties for handling freight improved. In the late forties it was already evident that the canal was likely to be discontinued. Finally, in 1851, the [jrojirietors began to dispose of their holdings of land and buildings in Middlesex Village north of Middlesex street, a tract of about six acres on which stood locks, storehouses, a collector's office and a cot- tage house and barn. This property was conveyed on September 3 of that year to the father of Judge Hadley, long in charge of the locks. In the conveyance the proprietors reserved the right to the canal until the charter should be stirrendered. The last boat to go from Lowell to Boston was one owned by Dix & Rand, in charge of Samuel King, carrying eighteen tons of stone and two cords of wood. It left Middle- sex V'illage, November 25, 1851. The Middlesex canal did not die in law until 1859, when the .Attorney-General of Massachusetts put it out of business. Figures of Pre-War Manufacturing at Lowell — In 1856. when Charles Cowley made a commercial sur\ey of the city for [lublication in a Ijook which contained Lin opposite pages a condensed history of the community and advertisements of its leading firms, Lowell had twelve large manufactur'ng cijrjiorations operating some fift}' mills. The aggregate capital of these concerns was aliout fourteen million dollars. The total value of their real and personal estate was estimated at twent}'-two million dollars. It was calctdated that the home market which they had created had increased the value of farm properties in the neighborhood of the city I)y at least a million dollars. Since 1S45 the number of sjnndles had doubled, the total now standing at 400.000. There were about 12,000 looms. Of cotton the mills required annually aljout 36,000,000 i)ounds: of wool. 5,000,000 pounds. Other raw ma- terials were used in corresponding amounts. The annual output of the looms amounted to So, 000, 000 yards of cotton cloth: 20,000,000 yards of calico: 15,000,000 yards of broadcloths and cassimers, 1,000,- 000 }-ards of carpet : 3,000 vards of rugs : $2,000,000 worth of machin- ery. The dailv output of woven cotton was about two hundred miles, enough to encircle the globe twice in a year. The most celebrated single product was the series of textiles known as "Merrimack Prints." made by the corporation of that name under direction of John D. Prince, for man}- ^•ears su])erintendent of the print works. In addition to the jjlants of the larger corporations. Lowell at this time had wadding and liatting mills, a good-sized flannel mill, several tanneries, sawing and iilaning mills, machine shops, dye houses, screw- bolt factories, card factories, bobbin and shuttle factories, bedstead THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY ' 243 factories, a wire fence factory, a l^agging mill, a grist mill and other minor industries. Transportation facilities of this period were well established. An immense business in freight and passengers was done over the Bos- ton & Lowell railroad. The Stony Brook railroad, giving Lowell a most valuable connection with the West, had been incorporated in 1845, with a capital of $300,000, and opened to shippers in July, 1846. Lowell and Lawrence were now connected by rail and the Lowell and Salem railroad, incorporated in 1848, with capital of $400,000, and opened for business August i, 1850, gave ingress to coal and other sea- borne commodities. Technique of Cotton Manufacture in Nineteenth Century — The technical processes of cotton manufacture at Lowell in the forties and fifties were in many respects the same as those of to-day, though, of course, mechanical imjirovements have been numerous. The cotton was botight by agents in the South, shipped to Lowell via Boston or Salem and deposited in storehouses. As required it was wheeled to the carding room, on the first floor of the lactory. Here each bale was opened and the cotton from the variotis sales mixed to insure a imiform quality. B}- action of a whipper the cotton was beaten and thrown into a state of flufiiness. Thence it passed thr(.nigh a conical willow emerging ready for the picker. The picker room was customarily in a Iniilding apart from the rest of the mill, on account of danger due to the rapid movement of the machinery. Here the cotton was laid upon a strip of cloth or leather ajjron and drawn into the picker where it was th(_iroughly opened and freed from lint and dust. Thence it passed through the lapper, coming out in sheets, neatly wound around a wooden cylinder. The laps were taken to the card room and applied to the backs of cards. The i)rocesses of carding were two fold ; the first through the breaker and the second through the doubler or lap-winder. After carding, the cotton was turned over to women operatives who sent it through the drawing frame, by means of which the fibres were laid in one direction and Ijrought together in a rope-like shape. These strands were twisted by the double-speeder into a coarse roving, which the stretcher drew out still further. From the carding room the fibres went to the spinning room on the floor above. The frames prior to 1845 were all of the "throstle"' type ; though mule spinning was introduced soon after that. The roving was distributed by a man to the operators of the speeders, throstles, warpers and dressers. Over each machine was the familiar one-week clock, used to mark the quantity of work done. The woof or filling came from the spinning room ready for the weaver, but the warp went to the dressing room, where the yarn was _'44 HISTORY OF LOW ELL warped off from the spools to the section beams. These beams were transferred to the dresser for sizing, brushing and drying. Then, with the ends drawn in through the harness and reed by hand, the yarn on eight section beams was transferred to a loom beam. Two weave rooms to each mill was the rule, with two or three overseers and a boy to distribute the yarn in each roc)m. Some 130 weavers to a room were employed. The woven fabric was carried to the cloth room, trimmed, meas- ured, folded, recorded and then cither baled for the selling agency or delivered at the print works. Aniline dyes were, of course, still far in the future and the calico printing of 1850 and thereabout involved inore laborious operations than now. A good description of the processes was furnished to the historian. Rev. Mr. Miles, by Dr. Samuel L. Dana, chemist of the Merrimack print works. In this account it is shown that upiin being received from the manufactory the cloth was singed, to get rid of the fine nai>, 1)}' running o\'er a half cylinder of copper, heated red hot. "This singeing process always excites the wonder of the beholder who is not a little astonished that the cloth is not injured." The bleaching was done in accordance with Dr. Dana's principle that "a good white is not only the Sdul of a print, Init without it no good and brilliant color can lie dyed." The cloth to be bleached was steeped in warm water fur some hours, washed in the dash wheel and subjected to the following operations: boiling by steam in creamy lime; washing in the dash-wheel; boiling in alkali by steam; washing in the dash wheel: steeping in bleaching powder solution fur some hours ; stee]3ing in dil iif vitriol and water," about the strength of lemon juice ;" washing in the dash wheel ; squeezing between rollers ; ironing in the flatwork ironer, then called the "mangle." In the printing of the bleached cloth four to six colors were ap- plied by the printing machine — others, if needed, 1:)y hand with blocks after the rest of the work was finished. The paste containing a mor- dant to fix the dyes was applied with an admixture of "sightcning" to enalile the printer to judge of the quality of the work. The popular mordants were alum and copperas, either of which was first modified into acetate of alumina or iron. In the color shop were prepared the various dyes and their accessories. Dyeing was then, of course, on vegetable basis, with madder, indigo and logwood prominent among the dye-stuffs. Having been printed and dried the cloth was "aged" in order that a chemical comliination might take place between the mordant and the cloth, the time of this process varying, according to circumstances, from two or three days to as many weeks. The cloth was then passed by means of rollers through a boiling hot solution of phosphate of THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 245 soda, to give insolubility to any uncoinbined mordant and to wet the cloth evenly. After washing in the dash wheel and removal of all thickening by immersion in hot bran and water or meal and water, the fabric was ready for the large wooden dye vats into which it was introduced over a winch. Steam was admitted and the goods turned, with the temperature of the water raised gradually, until, when the boiling point was nearly reached, the mordanted cloth was perfectly dyed. It was taken out rinsed, washed, and sometimes stiffened. Practices of heavily loading with metallic oxides, soap and glue, light flimsy cloth, not unknown in some textile factories of New England at this day, had hardly been conceived of in the simple era under con- sideration. A designer, with an assistant or two, drew the patterns which were reproduced at first on a small steel dye, thence transferred to a steel cylinder in relief and from this pressed into a copper roller under high pressure. Development of the Carpet Manufacture — One of the prime indus- trial develojMnents of this jjeriod was the introduction of carpet weav- ing at Lowell. Prior to 1842 all three-ply and ingrain carpets were made on hand looms, the motive power being furnished by the indi- vidual weaver. In that year a New England man, E. B. Bigelow, con- ceived a series of devices for an automatic carpet loom. His inven- tion was brought to the attention of the treasurer of the Lowell Manufacturing Company, who secured the exclusive right to make ingrain carpets by the Bigelow process. The carpet works soon became one of the show industries of the city. Prior to 1863 upwards of 25,964,185 yards of carpet had been woven at the works in ^larket street and Lowell carpets had become famous throughout the new world. This was also the period of the establishment of the dyestuflf trade in Lowell. The brothers Talbot, Charles P. and Thomas, founders of a family prominent in manufacturing at Lowell and North Billerica, settled here in the first years of the new city. They were of a race of woolen manufacturers of Ireland whose father had engaged in business at Cambridge, New York. The elder brother built up in Low'ell a famous business in dyestuffs under the style of C. P. Talbot & Co. The firm in 1851 bought the water power of the Middlesex Canal Company at North Billerica, and in 1857 built there a manufactory of woolen flannels, the nucleus of the present Talbot Mills. The civic services of both brothers were many, the younger rising to be Governor of the Commonwealth in 1879. The Crompton Loom at Lowell — Although the manufacture of the Crompton loom has been prominently associated with the Massa- chusetts city of Worcester, the first successful try-out of this loom 246 IllSToin- OF LOWl'lLL was in tlic Middlesex mills at Lowell. The Crumptdii family had been noted for several generations for their in\-entiveness. The original Samuel Crompton invented a device in cotton manufacture for which Parliament gave hmi an honorarium of ^25,000. Thomas I'. Cromp- ton invented an ajiparatus for drying jiaper which was introduced into the Farnsworth mills, of which he was proprietor. The first of the family to come to America was William Crompton, who after being here about a year devised a loom for weaving figured cassimeres. Mill men saw at once that this would be a valuable improvement. Crompton returned to England in 1830. secured a patent and returned to the United States with his wife and children. In the vear follow- ing he arranged to install his loom at the Middlesex mills, ^\'hile the importance of the invention was appreciated, the work of intro- ducing it elsewhere went slowly and Crom])ton became discouraged. In 1851. when the patent expired. lie was still a poor man. His son, however, (jeorge Crompton, had come into manhood and perhaps had brought to the enterprise a driving ability which the original inventor lacked. He entered, at all events, into ])artnership with Merrill E. Forbush and began at Worcester the commercial production of the l)est loom for figure wea\ing oi that date. \\'ithin a few years the Crr)mpton looms works, became, as now, one of the show factories of New England. Lowell at least claims the credit for the first demon- stration of the value of the invention. The Beginnings of the Patent Medicine Trade — :\mongthe newest businesses that had sought a location in the city, one of especial celebrity should be noted. Patent medicine manufacturing has prob- ably brought more publicity to Lowell than any other single industry. For many years past the labels on "Ayer's" and "Hood's" prepara- tions, to say nothing of their widely read almanacs and newspaper advertisements, have carried the city's name and fame to every part of the world. This very interesting industry began to be developed in 1843. when J. C. Ayer undertook the making and marketing of "Cherry Pectoral." "Cathartic Pills" soon feillowed. The establish- ment on Middle street was built up rapidly under modern methods of manufacture and advertising, so that when Cowley wrote his 1856 book it was already accounted "the largest indiviilual interest in the city," the receipts in that year amounting to more than half a million dollars. An edition of three million copies of the almanac then went liroailcast and the liottles of medicine shijiped out of Lowell would have sufficed to give three doses a year to every man, woman and child in the LTnited States. The career of Dr. James C. Ayer, who inaugurated the patent medicine industry at Lowell, was one of the most striking of this period. Born at Groton in 1S18, he came as a young boy to Lowell. THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 247 At the Lowell high schunl he was a fellow jnipil classmate of General R. F. Butler and others who later became distinguished. He also had special instruction in Latin from the Rev. Dr. Edson. After leaving school he was apprenticed to Jacob Robbins, then the leading apothecary of the city. In this shop he first compounded the cherry pectoral that later became famous. At twenty-three young Ayer bought out his employer's interest and moved into a store belonging to the Hamilton Manufacturing Company at the corner of Central and Jackson streets. In 1855 he admitted to partnership his brother, Frederick Ayer. In that year Ayer's Sarsaparilla was first marketed. Its success was almost instantaneotis. The senior partner in i860 was granted the degree of M. D. by the Philadelphia Medical University. He in the meantime had married Josephine M. Southwick and had bought the C)l(l Stone House in Pawtucket street. Effects of the Factory System on Operatives — The effect of the factory s}'stem upon those employed in the mills was an engaging subject of observation, discussion and speculation among nearly all who wrote about Lowell in the middle nineteenth century. Just as they were in the first years of the city, people were still anxious to know what good and what harm was done by a plan which brought together in great workshops thousands of workers, most of them women, and nearly all of them reared in quiet country homes. "Lowell is not amusing," wrote M. Chevalier, the French econo- mist, "but it is neat, decent, peaceable and sage. A\'ill it always be so? Will it be so long? It would be rash to affirm it; hitherto the life of manufacturing operatives has proved little favorable to the preser- vation of severe morals. So it has been in France as well as in England : in Germany and Switzerland as well as in France. But as there is a close connection between morality and competence it may be considered very probable that while the wages shall continue to be high at Lowell, the influences of a good education, a sense of duty and the fear of iniblic opinion will be sufficient to maintain good morals." Its defense of the reputation of Lowell mill operatives against current charges of immorality comprises a considerable part of the little book "Lowell as It Was and as It Is," which Rev. Mr. Miles, minister at the First Unitarian Church, published in 1845. The moral efl'ects of the factory system had, naturally, been under attack almost before it was established. It was obviously vulnerable from the angle of experience overseas, to say nothing the disposition of all reactionaries in all times to predict that whatever effects change will necessarily accomplish deterioration. In taking up "the provisions made for the health, comfort and moral protection of the operatives, and the actual character which the 248 HISTORY OF LOWELL mass of these operatives sustain," Mr. Miles begins with an admission that "Liiwell has been highly commended by some, as a model com- munity, for its good order, industry, spirit of intelligence and general freedom from vice. It has been strongly condemned by others as a hotlied of ci irruption, tainting and pcjlluting the whole land." Basing his generalization upon his personal experiences of nine years and believing himself to be free from partisan prejudice, the clergyman reached a conclusion very favorable to the present morality of the commimity even though he conceded that it "is an experiment whether we can preserve here a pure and virtuous population : whether there are no causes secretly at work, and to be developed in the course of thirty or forty years, to lower our standard, and to sink our character; whether we can run a career of half a century free from the corrupting and debasing influences which ha\'e almost universally marker! manu- facturing cities abroad." The circumstances of factory life in Lowell which Mr. Miles developed in his Ijook included one of especial importance in the fact that ii]jerati\-es of the first decades came out of an environment wdiich usually jiroduced self-respecting young people. They were, as has so often been observed, boys and girls from the farms of New England. The author of the forties, it is true, does not make allowances which every writer of to-day would feel constrained to make for the existence and jjersistence of much moral degeneracy in rural New England ; for debased strains in the hill towns that have almost automatically pro- duced criminals in generation after generation. He assumed "virtuous rural homes" in a land where in 1840 as in 191S some were inhabited by the "virtuous" and some by degenerates addicted to the practice of every known vice. Yet, making this allowance it may stand as a fact that early Lowell down at least to the Civil \\'ar was relatively for- tunate in its "supply of help from the virtuous homesteads of the country." It was emphasized that "we have no permanent factorv popula- tion. This is the wide gulf that sejjarates the English manufacturing towns from Lowell. The female ojjeratives do not work, on an aver- age, more than four and a half years in the factories. They then return to their homes and their jilaces are taken l.)y their sisters or by other female friends from their neighborhood. '■ ''^ * The former [in England] are resident operatives, and are operati\-es for life, and con- stitute a jiermanent dependent factory caste. The latter [in New England] come from distant homes to which in a few years they return to be the wives of the farmers and mechanics of the country towns and villages. The English visitor to Lowell, when he finds it so hard to understand wdiy American o])eratives are so superior to THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 249 those of Leeds and Manchester, will do well to remember what a different class of girls we have here to begin with." Drunkenness among women operatives was apparently very un- common in 1S45, and no doubt among men had been greatly reduced during the first years of the temperance movement. Mr. Miles states that "no persons are employed on the Corporation who are addicted to intemperance, or who are known to be guilty of any immoralities of conduct. .\s the parent of all other vices intemperance is most carefully excluded. Absolute freedom from intoxicating liquors is understood throughout' the city to be a prerequisite to obtaining employment in the mills, and any person known to be addicted to their use is at once dismissed. This point has not received the attention from writers upon the moral condition of Lowell which it deserves ; and we are surprised that the English traveler and divine, Dr. Scoresby, in his recent book on Lowell, has given no more notice to this subject. A more strictly and universally temperate class of per- sons cannot be found than the nine thousand operatives of this city: and the fact is as well known to all others living here as it is of some honest pride among themselves. In relation to other immoralities, it may l)e stated that the suspicion of criminal conduct, association \vith suspected persons and general and habitual light Ijehavior and con- \-ersation are regarded as sufiRcient reasons for dismission, and for which delinquent operatives are discharged." Dismissals from the mills, Mr. Miles goes on to state, were of two classes : honorable discharge and dishonorable discharge. There appears to have been so much cohesion among the factory employers of the day that the possession of an "honorable discharge" certificate was highly prized among the employees. It meant that another jcib could be readily secured. Those, on the other hand, who left one employment under a cloud were blacklisted. "Such per- sons." as Mr. Miles says in italics, "obtain no more employment throiugh- oiit tlic city." The kind of offences for which operatives were dishonoralilv dis- charged may be noted by a few specific cases : 1838. Dec. 31. Ann . No. 4, weaving room; discharged for altering her looms and thinning her cloth. 1839. Jan. 2. Lydia . No. i, spinning room; tsbtained an honorable discharge by false pretences. Her name has been sent round to the other Corporations as a thief and a liar. Jan. 3. Harriet and Judiah . From No. 4, spinning room, and No. 5, weaving room ; discharged as worthless characters. Jan. 9. Lydia . From No. 2, spinning room ; left irregu- larly ; name sent around. Feb. 15. Hadassah . From No. 3, lower weaving room; discharged for improper conduct — stealing from Mrs. . 250 HISTORY OF LO^^■r•:LL March 14. Ann . No. 2, sjiinnine; mom; discharged for reading- in the mill ; gave her a line stating the facts. March 29. Harriet . No. 4, carding room ; Laura , No. 4, spinning room.; h'llen . No. i, carding room; Gecjrge , re]:iair shop — all discharged for improper conduct. A])ril 3. Emily . No. 5, carding room ; discharged for ])rofanity and simdry other misdemeanors. Name sent round. The moral surveillance which is shown by such an extract from a corporation's ])ooks to have been regularly practiced among the "hell)," seems to this age to be more paternalistic than present day operatives would endure. The overseer, indeed, sitting at a little desk near the door of each department was an arbiter of reputations, for he was "held responsible for the good order, propriety of conduct ;ind attention to business of the operatives in that room." His word went, when it was a question of "sending a name 'round."' There must under such a system ha\'e lieen instances of injustice. No ])rovisiou for appeal against 1)lackdisting is mentioned by Mr. Miles. It presum- abl}' did not exist. The moral control which the women operatives exercised among themselves is emphasized liy various writers who ha\'e descril)ed the life among the industrial workers of Lowell. Public opinion was beyond doubt a more potent factor for discipline in the da}'s w'hen virtually all the mill girls were of one race and langua.ge, of a homo- geneous culture in other words, than now when they are separated by barriers of language and diverse social customs. "A girl siisf^cctcd of immoralities, or seri(jus improprieties of conduct," writes Miles, "at once loses caste. Her fellow boarders will at once leave the house if the keeper does not dismiss the ofTender. In self-protecti(_in, therefore, the matron is obliged to put the offender away. Nor will her former companions walk with, or work with her; till at length, tnuling herself everywhere talked about, and pointed at and shunned, she is obliged to relieve her fellow o]jeratives of a presence wdiich they feel Ijring dis- grace." Queries, in the form of what would now be called a "question- aire," were put by Mr. Miles to several mill agents and through them to the overseers of the corporations. The data thus obtained remain as perhaps the best extant documentary e\idence of the racial char- acter of the operatives of that time and the ideals under which it was undertaken by the companies to protect their morality. Characteristic statistics are those furnished In- the Merrimack Manufacturing Company. The mill selected is our No. 3 mill. The names of the overseers are as follows, viz.: Jes.'ie Phelps, who has been Overseer over 19 years. John W, Holland, wlio has been Overseer over 17 years. THE ANTE-BELLUM CITV 251 George W'ellniaii. who has heen Overseer ()\ er 11 years. James Townseiid, who has hcen Overseer over 11 years. James C. Crombie, who has been Overseer over i year. Xumber of girls employed usually in the mill, iwn humlri-il and forty. Natives of — New Hampshire resented the cft'orts of not more than si.x regular writers and about twenty occasional contributors. The first of the comparatively few^ strikes which Lowell has ex- perienced occurred ^■ery soon after the incorporation of the munici- pality. It was not a very serious aft'air, as one realized from a rather amusing account of it written in 1876 by Mrs. ^V. S. Robinson : "The first strike, or 'turn-out,' as it was called, was in 1S.36, and was caused, of course, by the reduction of wages. Tlie operatives were very indig- THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 261 nant: they held meetings and decided to stop their work and turn out and let the mills take care of themselves. Accordingly, one day they went as usual, and when the machinery was well started up they stopped their looms and frames and left. In one room some indeci- sion was shown among the girls. After stopping their work they dis- cussed the matter anew and could not make up their minds what to do, when a little girl of eleven years old said : 'I am going to turn out whether any one else doe^ or not,' and marched out, followed by all the others. The 'turn outs' all went in procession to the grove on 'Chapel Hiir and was addressed by sympathizing speakers. Their dissatisfac- tion suljsided or Ijurned itself out in this way, and though the authori- ties did not accede to their demands, they returned to their work, and the corporations went on cutting down their wages." Initial Restriction of Hours of Labor — The first real contest for shortening the hours of labor in Massachusetts factories began in 1850. with a proposal favoring a shorter day. By comparison with more recent legislation this measure would seem preposterously in- adecjuate for its purpose. It was, of course, strenuously resisted by the corjjorations and many who were not specifically under the cor- porate influence believed in a general way that it was a good thing for the Working class not to have much leisure. Nobod}' at that date understood how many evils, physical and mental, grow out of exces- sive fatigue superinduced by long hours of labor; nor was it appre- ciated that in the long run the liinnan mechanism is most productive when operated with alternate periods of rest and activity. On the reformatory side was the agile minded Benjamin F. But- ler, who in 1852 made a campaign for the Legislature on this issue. It was unquestionable that the cor])orations were determined to head him off, for in various mills of the city was posted this notice : "Any man who votes the Ben Butler ten-h(jur ticket will be discharged.' This attempted interference with the suffrage was resented and a great indignation meeting was held at which Mr. Butler is recorded as saying: "I do not counsel revolution or violent measures; for I do not, I can not believe that the notice posted in the mills was author- ized. Some ignorant underling has done this with the hope of pro- pitiating the favor of distant masters; misjudging them, misjudging you. The owners of the mills are surely too wise, too just, or at least too prudent, to authorize a measure which absolutely extinguishes government, which incites and justifies anarchy. For tyranny less odious than this, men of Massachusetts, our fathers cast off their allegiance to the king, and plunged into the bloody chasm of revolu- tion : and the directors must know that the sons stand ready to do what their sires have done before them." 262 HISTORY OF LOWELL The young Lowell attorney was elected and the eleven-hour i)ro- posal Ijecame law. First Setback to Lowell's Prosperity — Toward the end of its first quarter century of existence, Lowell for the first time began to suffer from an exodus of its inhabitants This was a new experience. \\'hen the place was young and when opportunities for industrial employ- ment were still very limited the jiioneer factory town experienced only influx after influx of inhabitants It was excei)tional for people who had once established themselves m Lowell to go elsewhere. From the time, however, of the gold discovery in California liegan a process of constant dilution of the population by emigration which is still going on. The call of the West, of New York City and of newer manufactur- ing centres in New England has long been insistent, and consistent efforts have never been made to counteract it. In recalling the first great commercial calamit}' of this kind, Gen- eral Butler said at the centennial exercises in 1876: "Another cause which retarded our prosperity, rpiite frequently overlooked, came in the years 1848-49, and was the discovery of gold in California. Those listening to me past the middle age of life who can throw their minds back tC) that period will remember that that was quite the darkest time Lowell has ever known, and for the reason that in addition to the fact that the dividends earned here, just alluded to, were not spent here, the enterprise and spirit of our young men were drawn by stories of fabulous wealth to be had in California. During that fever we lost nearly 1,300 young and middle-aged men who left us for the Golden State, and they were among the best, most energetic and enterprising of our citizens, or they would not have had the energy to go." Organization of Many Humanitarian Associations — As a city no- tably responsive to the influences of its time, Lowell could hardly have failed to become a centre of vaiious humanitarian movements in the quarter century between its incorporation and the outbreak of the Civil War. This era was one in which movements of what would now be called "uplift" liecame \ery prominent in the national consciousness, the period stjmewh.nt resemljling the generations of .\merican idealism between the opening of the Chicago Exposition and the participation of the Nation in the war of the nations in 191 7. The anti-slavery agitation, destined finally to bring the forces of modern ca])italism and those of surviving feudalism into armed con- flict, was only one of matiy that looked forward to the improvement of the conditions of living on the planet, some of them absurdly unscien- tific and empirical, but almost all of them grounded in sincerity and fine lofty altruism. This was the time of the Brook Farm and Red Bank efforts to apply the communistic principles of Fourier ; of Josiah THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 263 \\'arren's equity mercantile enterprises; of the beginnings of Sylves- ter Graham and of almost countless "isms." In this period concessions to the common people were many, as in the abolishment of imprison- ment for debt and the improvement of public schools. The Period of "The Lowell Offering" — Emerson wrote of this era of the outflowing of \ew England transcendentalism: "The children of New England between 1820 and 1840 were born with knives in their brains.'' In many of them, certainly, the literary instinct was strongly developed. In the Lowell mills the "literary'' girls might often be seen writing poetry on scraps of paper while still attending to their looms or spinning frames. The idea of forming an association for literary purposes was first ])roposed in 1837 by Harriot F. Curtis. Out of her proposal grew an "improvement circle." Who its officers were is no longer recorded. It is known that Emmeline Larcom was secretary. Other improve- ment societies followed, so that in 1843 there were at least five in as many neighborhoods of the city. .\11 who attended meetings were expected to bring a written contribution to be read aloud. In 1839 the Rev. Abel S. Thomas and Rev. Thomas B. Thayer, pastrrs respectively of the Fir-l and Second L^niversalist churches, estal)lished improvement circles in their societies. Some of the ctmtri- butions which were read at their meetings proved to be remarkably interesting The}- were published by Mr. Thomas in pamphlet form under the title of "The Lowell Offering, a Repository of Original Articles, written by Females employed in the Mills." The first series, covering the contributions of four months, was issued in October, 1840. A brisk demand for the booklet at once appeared. Tct meet this a new rev'ew. "The Lowell Offering." jjrobably so-called, now began to be printed. It was usuall}- of thirty-two pages and was issued under the church auspices until October, 1842, when Miss Curtis and Harriet Farlev took it over, and thereafter assumed responsibility for it. The story of the career of this famous magazine and of some of its contril)- utors is told at greater length in a special chapter <>n Lowell autl-ors in this histor}'. Growth of the Middlesex Mechanics' Association — The ante-bel- lum years were the lime of the Mechanics' .Association's greatest pros- perity. It used to be a source of lioyish wonder, in the seventies and eighties, just what the Middlesex Mechanics' Association and its ex- cellent library in Button street had to do with mechanical affairs. In conspicuous positions hung several rather awe-inspiring fidl-length portraits. These were obviously not portraits of mechanics — at least not of mechanics of the present-day type. The library was of a gen- eralized sort, and the well-informed librarian was not one to whom one 264 HISTORY OF LOWELL would turn for infurniatiun about gears, shafting or high-speed steels, however helpful she might be in selecting a historical novel or bring- ing forth material for debating society use. Most of those who used the library seemed not to l)e of the mechanic sort, but rather to be people will) preferred its quiet exclusiveness to the democracy of the public lilirary. The Mechanics' Association of 1885 — that is only a rccoUectidn df a persmial ''mpression — appeared to !)c one of the insti- tutions of Lowell in which an overalled mechanic would be ])articu- larly ill at ease. The Middlesex Mechanics' Association was, in fact, something of a Lowell analogue of the Boston Athenaeum. That the recession from original intent came early in the history of the association is well established. .'\s an organization composed exclusively of men engaged in the mechanical trades this association almost "died a-borning." As a clearing house of literary and scientific culture it led a notabl}- useful existence for sixty years or more. It was at the height of its influence and prestige just before and during the Civil War. In the latter decades of the century its day had plainly passed and its dissolution was as clearly foreseen as regretted. The association, as already noted, was incorporated in 1825, upon petition (jf some eighty mechanics of the then manufacturing village of East Chelmsford. The name conveyed a suggestion of the original intent of the association. It was expected that a membership of me- chanics of Middlesex County would be enrolled. The first meeting was held (')ctol)er 6, 1825, at "Ira Fry's Inn," which stoiid in Central street on the site of the present American House. "We aim to be just," was adopted as the association motto. It was decided to charge an admission fee <_if three dollars and thereafter (juarlerly assessments of twenty-five cents. A somewhat grandiloquent statement of the aims and objects of the organization may be noted in "An Address De- livered before the IMiddlesex Mechanics Association at the .\nni\'er- sary, October 4, 18J7," by Ithamar A. Beard. The peroration of this oratorical effort may be worth quoting : "This association was formed for the mutual lienefit of its memljers ; for the improvement of their morals ; and for the good of society generally. May we be an example to others of temperance, frugality and industry ; of a charitable disposition towards others, and of cjuiet peaceable citizens. May no disgraceful action characterize any of its members; and may we aim at the general good of society and our own mutual improvement. In doing which I would recommend that the Association meet more fre- quently than we have done heretofore, and statedly enter into the dis- cussion of some useful topic that will serve to improve the mind, make us niiire intimately acquainted with each other and more firmly unite US bv the stronger bonds of interest and friendship." Presumably the workers for whom and by whom the associati'm THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 265 was founded did not respond as expected to invitations to join. In Decemlier. 1827, at all e\ents. a vote was passed to the effect that "manufacturers are considered mechanics and may be admitted." This action, which was not adopted without opposition, hej^an a long series of discussions and controversies concerning the conditions of membership. In Feliruary. 1S34, it was voted that "an attempt should be made to raise the character of this association and to form it into an active and useful association." In jjursuance of this motion the by-laws were radically changed. An admittance fee of twenty-five dollars was estab- lished, representing a share which was transferable. An appeal was taken to substantial citizens and some 220 new members were voted in. It was also purposed to raise money for a building. This plan was furthered by the gift, in August, 1H34, of a lot of land in Button street, \alued at about $4,500, which the proprietors of the Locks and Canals deeded over to the association. By sale of shares the members mean- time raised about $7,000 and started in to Iniild a structure of which the total initial cost was about $20,000. In this undertaking Kirk Boott took great interest. In its new quarters the association became an institution of much moment to the city. Its Lyceum lectures for many years brought to Lowell the best speakers of the day. The library and reading room had a very general use. Opening of Hospital and Di&pensary — Among humanitarian insti- tutions whose foundation date back to the first days of the city, none is more striking in equipment than the Lowell Corporation Hospital, whose fine Ionic portico is one of the landmarks of the city. This hos- pital originated in 1839, when the several manufacturing companies ])urchased the mansion which Kirk Boott, then lately deceased, had erected on the old Tyler farm and had afterwards removed to the head of Merrimack street. The cost to the companies of purchase and alterations was aliout $20,000. The building was devoted to the needs of operatives who were ill. A resident physician was appointed and the spacious living rooms and chambers converted into wards. The charges were set at four dollars a week for men and three dollars for women. Those patients who were able to pay settled directly with the superintendent ; those unable to do so referred their needs to the corporation agent, who became responsible. Of the expenses of the hospital the corporations in the first years paid about two-thirds. The nrmber of ])atients in the forties averaged about 150 annually. The Lowell Dispensary, another fine charity, was incorporated in 1836, having as its object to hel]) the poor by affording medicines and medical attendance gratuitously. It employed two physicians, each with a section of the city under his charge. All subscribers to the jG6 history of LOWELL support of this institution commanded the services of the phjsicians in behalf of the sick poor. The Howard Benevolent Society was organized in 1840. It aimed to "afford encouragement and aid to the moral and industrious poor."' A board of trustees was divided into subcommittees of two i)ersons to each ward of the city. On proper recommendation the society was to make gifts or loans of articles necessary for relief of distress. The ministry at large, a model non-denominational religious in- stitution of Lowell, was established in 1844 at the instance of the South Congregational Society (LTnitarian) and in accordance with a plan devised by Rev. Dr Tuckerman, in Boston. The object was to minister to the temporal and spiritual needs of persons not reached by the existing religious societies. Regular services were held each Sun- day in the Hamilton chapel on Middlesex street. No collections were taken and no pew rents exacted. A Sunday school of about one hun- dred children was soon enrolled. The ministry at large began at once to employ a minister who gave most of his time to relieve suffering among the poor. The annual reports of the first years are excellent examples of descriptive writing ;'nd valuable sources of information as to economic and social C(.indition''. in the city. New Churches in the Pre-War Period — The multiplication of Prot- estant churches between 1836 and i860 in the city of Lowell seems as remarkable as are the present difficulties with which many of them are beset. The community was composed almost entirely of church-going people, most of whom were of the old Puritan stock. A man or woman who had no religious affiliations was under suspicion of being a had citizen. The Congregational churches in especial were spread over the community to an extent that at a later date proved embarrassing. The Second Congregational Church, the jiredeccssor of the jires- ent l'',liot Church, began its services under the town government. Its first church liuilding, in .\ppleton street, the one which was afterwards sold til the First Presbyterian Church, was dedicated July 10, 1S31. The fu'st minister was Rev. William Twining, ordained (Jctolier 4, 1831. In 1837 came Rev. LTriah Burnap, who remained with the church until he died in 1854. Mr. Burnaji was succeeded by twii ministers of comjjaratively shcirt pastorates: Rev. George Darling, who stayed two years and then accepted a call to Ohio, and Rev. John P. Cleveland, whii resigned to become cha|ilain of the Thirtieth Massachusetts Regi- ment. In 1831) it appeared that still another Congregational church was needed, and on March 1 i of that year the men members of the First .•md Second societies met and voted that "it is expedient to form imme- diately a new church." It was resolved that "from each church should THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 267 be taken, to form the new church, not more than t\venty-fi\e males and one hundred and fifty females from both churches." This arrang-ement was the beginning of the church in John street, now defunct, which for many years was one of the strong centres of orthodox Congregationalism in Massachusetts. Under date of Febru- ary 22, 1839, John Aiken, Royal Southwick and Jesse Fox were incor- porated as "Proprietors of John Street Church in Lowell." These pro- prietors, together with A. L. Brooks, David Sanborn, and Edward F. Watson were chosen as a building committee. Land was bought of the Locks and and Canals Comjiany at two shillings a square foot. The church building cost $17,884.12. It was dedicated Januar\- 2t,. 1840, with a sermon by Rev. Amos Blanchard, of the First Church. A call was extended to an Andover student, Stedman W. Hanks, a gradu- ate of Amherst College, who was installed as pastor March 20, 1840. A crisis in Mr. Hanks' pastorate, the story of which has been re- lated by the Rev. George H. Johnson, afterwards minister of the church, was typical of the controversies of the time. The new minis- ter was a pronounced anti-slavery and temperance advocate, and he soon was in trouble because he preached on these moral issues instead of confining himself to "pure religi(in." As Mr. Johnson savs, "his course speedily ga\e offence to the staid and conservative elements of society : the church came to be designated as 'Texas.' and it was said that the subjects considered at its meetings were 'rum and niggers' instead of the Gospel. After much consultation a council representing twenty churches was convened to advise whether the zealous young pastor should be dismissed. All the deacons were opposed to his remaining: on the other hand the women of the church stood loyally by their pastor, ninety-seven being in his favor to thirteen against him. The result of the council's deliberation was in favor of Mr. Hanks, and the opposition to him was gradually won over by his steadfast spirit and by a real zeal for the prosperity of the new church enterprise. A marked revival of religion followed this reconciliation ; large congre- gations attended the services and the Sunday school, containing over 700 members, was said to be the largest in the State. An addition of over 100 new members on a single Sunday, and a contribution of more than $700 at one collection, showed that the new church had outlived the spirit of dissension, and from that time to the ]iresent no dissen- sion between the pastor and people has marred the usefulness of the organization." Re\'. Mr Hanks was dismissed from the i)astorate at John street church in October, 1852. He had served the church nearh- thirteen years during which he had welcomed into its meml)ership 627 com- municants. The second John street pastor was the very distinguished Rev. 26« HISTORY OF LOWELL Eden B. Foster, born at Hanover, New Hanipsliire, in 1813, being one of eight brotliers of whom seven were graduated from Dartmouth Col- lege and six became ministers. When called to Lowell, Dr. Foster was minister of the church in the nearby town of Pelham. His instal- lation tocik place February 3, 1853. He served the church during two pastorates, the first extending to 1861 and the second between the years 1866 and 1878, in which latter year he was made pastor emeritus. He died April 11, i(S62. His first pastorate was one in wliicli he took a decided stand against negro slavery. The fourth Congregational church to be organized within the jircsent city limits was that in Kirk street. On April 22. 1845, James Buncher and fifty-five other members of the First Church jietitinned for dismissal in order that they might start a new church. On Ma_\' 2 the petition was granted. The church started with 157 members. It was voted to call Rev. Amos Blanchard, then pastor of the First Church, at a salary of $1,000. 'I'his call was accepted on i\Iay 17 and four days later Mr. Blanchard was dismissed from his former pastorate to take \\\) his new one. Services were held at first in Mechanics Hall and a Sunday school was formed. Later the place of worship was changed to City Hall, where services were held for about a year. A location for the neu' clnu'ch in Kirk street was decided at a meeting of June 30, 1845. The church building, which has since been torn down to make room for the high school extension, was dedicated December 17, 1846. It.-> total cost was $22,679.12, including $1,800 for an organ and $3,805.13, the cost of the land. The pews were assessed at $3,500 per annum and were auctioned c:in Christmas Day. Rev. Dr. Blanchard, wlio was called to the Kirk street church lie- fore it was Iniilt. stayed with it down to his death. January 14, 1870. He was liorn at Andover, March 7, 1807, and was graduated from Yale College, and from the Andover Theological Seminary. His first minis- try began at the First Church in 1829, so that his entire professional career of more than forty years was spent in Lowell. F.arly deacons of the church were John Aiken, elected 1845, but declined to serve; Sewell G. ^lack. elected 1845 and resigned Ma)- 28, 1895. after fifty years' service; James Buncher, elected 1845, Init declined to serve; Samuel Stickney, elected 1845 and died 1875; James Buncher, elected 1847 and resigned 1864 on account of leaxiiig the city; Nathaniel Bart- lett, elected 1847 and resigned 1864. Superintendents rif the Sunday school before i860 were: Samuel W. Stickney. 1845: T. L. P. Lam- son, 1849: .\aron W'alker. 1850: Josiah G. Coburn. 1831; Andrew Moody, 1853; Samuel W. Stickney, 1853. Singing by the church congregation originated at Kirk street chiu'ch, so far at least as New England is concerned, according to remi- niscences related in June, 1S75, in a sermon preached bv Rev. C. D. THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 269 Barrows in commemoration of the thirtieth anniversary of the found- ing of the society. "This was the first city in Xew England," he said, "that introduced congregational singing into its Sabbath services, and Boylston was the first tune upon which the experiment was tried. It happened that the pastor was preaching in exchange the second Sab- bath of the trial, and the ofificiating clergyman, after reading the hvmn. was so surprised at seeing the audience rise and begin to sing, that he quite forgot his ministerial dignity, and his gravity gave way to a generous smile as, unable to take his seat, he stood chained to the spot — but whether by the superiority of the music or by the unexpected volley from the audience was never clearly known." The crowded condition of John Street Church presently led to a movement on the ])art of those members living in Belvidere to organ- ize a society of their own. The High Street Congregational Church accordingly was organized January 22, 1S46, with seventy-one mem- bers, of whom fifty-two came from Jc'hn Street and the others from elsewhere. The original incorporators were Erastus D. Leavitt, Arte- mas L. Brooks and John Tuttle. Major Atkinson C. Varnum states that "The enterprise of establishing a fifth Congregational church in Lowell, to be located on the east side of Concord river, seems to have been suggested by the failure of St. Luke's Protestant Episcopal Church (which was incorporated February 25, 1842), and the feeling that the field should be occupied by some Protestant denomination." The first meeting of the society was held in the vestry of John Street Church. July 7, 1845, Nathan Crosby acting as moderator. Arrange- ments were made to purchase the unfinished edifice known as St. Luke's Church on December 4, 1845. The first pastor was the Rev. Timothy Atkinson, installed February 25, 1846. He was followed on December 15, 1847, by Rev. Joseph H. Towne, who after seven years was succeeded by Rev. Orpheus T. Lamphear, whose stay was only a year. On September 15, 1857, came Rev. Owen Street, D. D., who remained until his death May 27, 1887. St. Luke's Church, which the High street congregation acquired as a church home for $7,300, represented an unfortunate attempt to establish an Episcopal church in Belvidere with insufficient financial support. In the late thirties the attendance at St. Anne's Church had increased so fast that another Anglican church was proposed. Serv- ices were held for a time in a room in the Wyman Exchange, with Justin T. McCay as minister, and with music directed by George Hed- rick as a volunteer organist and choir director. The room was soon overcrowded, and Mr. McCay felt that the time was at hand for a new edifice. Against the advice of some of his supporters he circulated a subscription list and obtained money enough to buy the lot of land in Belvidere and to erect the present structure, which was heavily mort- 2J0 HISTORY OF LOWELL gaged. The church was first occupied in 1841. ']"he attenchmce, which had seemed overwhehning at the room in the Wyman Exchange, failed to fill the pews. The financial support which Mr. McCay had confi- dently expected from the manufacturing corporations was for some reason or other withheld. The ]jrospect steadily grew more discour- aging, and in 1845 the opportunity to sell to the newly organized Con- gregational body was welcomed. A Third Congregational Church, which was started in June, 1832, came to an end soon after the incorporation of the city. This society, whose struggling existence of about six years has been generally for- gotten, was initiated, like several others to follow, by reason of the crowded condition of the pews in the First Church. To Major Var- num the late Deacon Samuel B. Simonds contributed some reminis- cences frcjm which it appears that the society began with eighty-three communicants. The first prejiaratory lecture and communion ser\'ice was ministered by the Rev. Daniel .S. .Southmaid. On December iS, 1832. a call was extended to Rev. Charles Kittredge to settle "at a sal- ary of $700 the first year, to be increased $300 when the resources of the church would admit." This call was declined. After two other clergymen had refused to come, Rev. Giles Pease, of Coventry, Rhode Island, accepted the invitation. He was installed October 2, 1833. Public services were maintained in a Iniilding at the corner of Market (then Lowell) and Sufifolk streets. In 1833 financial irregularities of the treasurer comjjelled the society to give up its building and hold meetings in the town hall. The embarrassment continued and the church made an a])peal to the ci immunity for help in buving a theatre that had been constructed on Market street, just alio\e Worthen street, and which the owners would sell for four thousand dollars. "Considerable aid," it is related, "was furnished by peo])le who were not especially interested in the church, but were willing to be rid of the theatre." A large audience assembled at the first religious serv- ices in this l)uilding, "owing in part to the fact that one Henry Patch had circulated the report that 'a performance would be given that evening at the theatre'.'' The attendance presumalily did not continue to be satisfactory, for in 1834 the society adopted the free church sys- tem under the style of "The First Free Church of Lowell." The for- mer name of the Third Congregational Church was resumed in 1837. Meantime, on I\la>' 31, 1836, Mr. Pease hatl resigned. In 1837 mem- bers of the church sent a communication to the other churches oi the city stating explaining their embarrassed financial condition and ask- ing advice as to the proper course to pursue. No records have been found to show what reply was made to this communication, but it was Mr. Simonds' recollection that in the s]iring of 1838 the remaining 1. I.NTIOKli il; \li;\\ (i|'' ST. I'ATUIi'KS c'HI'llc-H. ■2. ST. IM'rPKIfS ClIUlK.'ll. ?,. iii:\iArr.TLATio concki'tkin chukoh. 4. INTKRlnr. A-lls\V OF ST. JICAN BAl'TISTI'; CHURCH. THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 271 iiicinhers \'Oted themselves letters of dismission to other churches of tlieir choice. The Second Universalist Society, later known as the Shattuck Street Universalist Society, grew out of a meeting of May 22, 1836. in City Hall, at which Rev. J. G. Adams was preacher. He officiated four Sundays and then a meeting was held in Mechanics' building to con- sider whether or not it was advisable to organize a society. A com- mittee reported that it was so expedient, and accordingly, on Septem- temljer 4. 1836, about one hundred men and women signed the pream- ble and constitution. The first pastor, the Rev. Zenas Thompson. was installed February 5, 1837. The first annual meeting was held March 27, 1837, at which Solon D. Pumpelh- was chosen chairman; David Tapley. treasurer; W. B. Davis, collector; Isaac Place, James C. Hill, Hale Clement. Otis Bullard and Holland Streeter, jirudential committee. St. Peter's is Lowell's second oldest Roman Catholic church, and dates its beginning from the )-ear 1841, St. Patrick's from 183 1. When it was deemed important that "Chapel Hill," as the Gorham, Green and William streets section was called, should have a church of its own, there was a great deal of ojiposition among the parishioners of St. Patrick's, and a special meeting was called in 1841, at which Bishop Fenwick, of Boston, presided. Bishop Fenwick was impressed by the speeches of those favoring a second church, and finally, to test their sincerity, he asked for all who would contribute $100 to a building fund to indicate it by rising. He received such a hearty response that the debate was ended without further argument, and a second parish was decided upon. As a result, a plain brick church edifice costing about $22,000 was dedicated in September. 1S42, that church standing at the corner of Gorham and Appleton streets. Services w^ere first held in the church on Christmas Day, 1842, Rev. Father Conway being the first pastor of the new parish, which was named in honor of St. Peter. At the dedi- cation the pews sold at a high price, those nearest the altar bringing $200 and more, each purchaser receiving a deed signed by Bishop Fen- wick. The new parish was under Father Conway's care until 1847 ''"'l prospered. Failing health compelled Father Conway to take a vaca- tion, Rev. Peter Crudden being appointed to fill the pastorate during his absence. Later Father Crudden was appointed pastor of St. Peter's, Father Conway going to a .Salem parish. Father Crudden continued as pastor until the summer of 1883. man_\- parish activities dating from his pastorate, one being St. Peter's Orphan Asylum on Appleton street, near St. Peter's Church, built and placed in charge of the Sisters of Charity, whom he introduced to the city. Rev Michael Ronan succeeded Father Crudden, August 8, 1883. 272 HISTORY OF LOWELL and j^reatl}- im[)r defray in part the cost of the new build- ings erected. After the sale of the old building, possession lieing at once demanded, quarters were found in the newl}'-erected building owned by the Shaw Stocking Company, which was used until the completion nf the new home. The business administration inaugu- rated bv Father Ronan has since pre\ailed, the children of the Orphan- age, about one hundred and thirty, are cared for under the best condi- tions, and Sisters of Charitv are in charge, under the sujiervising care of the [jastor of St. Margaret's and general direction of the pastors of the Catholic parishes of the city. No vital interest of St. Peter's has licen neglected in bringing anout the snlution of these problems, (in the contrary, the ]iarish, under Dr. Keleher, has prospered materially and spirituall}-. and in the nianv wavs not visible to the unthinking l)ut to those who can discern are the truest measure of a pastor's success. He is a profound and learned theologian, an eloquent preacher, possessing a fine voice and commanding presence, a cultured Christian gentleman with a pleasing personality which wins the love and respect of all who come within the circle of his influence. He is a strong advocate for any cause he mav espouse, and numbers his friends among all classes. He THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 275 is a member of the Lowell Board of Trade, and interested in all move- ments tending to the betterment of the city and the cause of the com- mon good. It is in keeping with this spirit that he so warmly advo- cates the cause of temperance, his long continued labor as chaplain of the Mathew Society resulting in great good. He has also interested himself in the Society of San Antonio, an Italian social and beneficial society, and in many ways his influence has been exerted for the good of his fellow-men outside of his priestly duties. Many substantial improvements to the church property have been made during Dr. Keleher's pastorate, amongst others, the purchase in May, 1910, of the residence immediately south of the rectory and the removal of the buildings, and the addition of the site to the grounds surrounding church and rectory. In 1916 the building north of the church was removed and the site added to the church grounds. In 191 5 a beauti- ful estate, at the corner of Highland and Thorndike streets, was pur- chased, and a convent opened. In 1916 the adjoining property was purchased, and after extensive alterations and improvements, was joined to the former, and now both are occupied by the Sisters who teach in the school. There is nothing in the histor_\- of St. Peter's parish of which the people are more proud than that it is the home of Cardinal O'Connell, for here he was born, and here he spent his childhood and youth, and e\en in thiise early days gave promise of his great career. The many activities of Rev. Theodore Edson at St. Anne's and of his devoted parishioners kept that church in the forefront of the city's life. At the Unitarian church. Rev. Henr}- Adolphus Miles continued his enlightened and scholarly ministry during a period of sixteen years down to Alay 30, 1853, when he resigned to become secre- tary of the American Unitarian Association. He was succeeded by the Rev. Theodore Tebbetts, whose pastorate, interrupted by ill health. lasted only ten days and who was followed liy Rev. Frederick Hinck- lev. whose ministry continued until October 3. 1864. The first cemetery to be ojiencd after the incorporation of the town of Lowell was the Old Lowell Bm-ying Ground on Gorham street, just opposite the former fair grounds. The first grave in this was dug August 15. 1833. It is still kept up, though of late years there have been but few interments. The Lowell Cemetery, occupying some eighty-four acres of land near the Concord river to the south of Fort Hill, was laid out by a corporation chartered March 8. 1841. The original officers were: President, Oliver M. Whipple ; treasurer. James C. Carney ; clerk, Charles Hovey ; trustees, John .\ikcn. James Cook. Jonathan Tyler, Samuel Lawrence, John \\'. Graves, Seth Ames. John C. Dalton, Alex 276 HISTORY OF LOWELL ander Wright, David Dana, Eliphalet Case, John Nesmith and Wil- liam Livingston. The cemetery was dedicated June 20, 1841, with exercises of great solemnity. There was singing by the Lowell L'nion Singing Society, J. C. Aiken, conductor. Rev. Lemuel Porter offered the prayer. The dedicatory address by the Rev. Amos Blanchard was long remembered for its eloquence and rich imagery. TJie consecrat- ing prayer was made by the Rew Henry A. Miles and the benediction delivered by the Rev. Mr. Packard, of Chelmsford. The Catholic and Edson cemeteries were opened in 1846 in the sandy plain acniss Ciirhnm street from the fair grounds. Social Life Before the War — Socially, Lowell continued to be — much as it was under the town government — a coiumunitv of delight- ful homes. Cultivated people kept alive the arts and sciences. Of gayety there was enough. Suggestive testimony to the social charm of the city's first years was offered by Judge J. G. Abbott, in a letter read at the centennial celebration of 1876. This jurist, whose residence in Lowell ended just before the Civil War, wrote : My acquaintance with Lowell began in the latter part of 1834, when it had a population, I believe, of about twelve thousand. I think all who lived there at that time and for the next twenty years, will agree with me that in saying that no city of its size ever contained more remarkable people or [was] a pleasanter or more cultivated cit}-. I doubt if any place of as large a population ever had within its borders a larger number of very able men who would be marked and remark- able in any community. The reason of it was, I think, that for scime years our state had not been especially progressive or prosperous, Ijut on the contrary quiet and even languishing. Our lands, for agriculture, could not compete with the al)unclant fertility of the West. Our commerce had been paralyzed by the war with England, and was slow in recovering. Lowell was the real beginning of a new epoch for our state. Here was an opening for men of energy, ]:)ower and activity who had been wait- ing for an opportunity — and it was improved. Lowell's Wealthy Men of the "Fifties" — Who the Lowell men re- puted to be wealthy were in 1851, together with some notes on their personal characteristics, came out in an entertaining ])ublication writ- ten \>y A. Forlies and J. W. Greene, with the title of "The Rich Men of Massachusetts, containing a Statement of the Reputed Wealth of about Fifteen Hundred Persons, with Brief Sketches of more than one Thousand Characters." One of the features of this compilation was its emphasis on the benevolence, or lack thereof, of the well-to-do persons listed, the belief of the authors being that an increasing jealousy of the poor regarding the rich might be dissipated if the latter all gave liberally to good causes. Thev expressly state that when nothing in their notes is said THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 277 concerning a person's benevolence the reader should not conclude that this man never gives, but simply that he has not acquired among his felli)\v-men a reputation for being liberal. The following were found to be the indubitably solid men of Lowell, with their ratings and, in some instances, their personal char- acteristics: Adams, Joel, $100,000. Began with small means. Law- yer by profession. President of Prescott Bank. Bartlett, Homer, $100,000. Native of Granby. Graduate of Williams College. Studied law with Hon. Daniel Noble, W'illiamstown. Cashier of Ware Bank and agent of \\'are Manufacturing Company. About 1839 appointed agent of the RLissachusetts Cotton Mills, Lowell. "Mr. Bartlett is a remarkable demonstration of what can be effected by application, un- tiring perseverance, and inflexible integrity. He commenced without a cent, and with but a partial allowance from his father to defray the expenses of his classical education, and even this pittance he has long since refunded. He enjoys the unqualified respect of the citizens of Lowell." Carter, George, $100,000. Began a poor boy, but received something by marriage. Apothecary. "A very industrious, jjrudent man and much given to acts of benevolence." Fiske, William. $100,- 000. Commenced in Lowell poor. Carpenter. "Energetic man and very benevolent." French, Benjamin F., $100,000. Mostly inherited. President of Railroad Bank. Livingston, William, $100,000. Began a hard-worker, digging, jobbing, etc. Has a lumber wharf and deals in coal, lime and grain. "Made twenty thousand dollars one year by selling grain at a profit of two cents on the bushel. Had no education to begin with. A man of very fair benevolence." Nesmith, John, S200,ooo. Nesmith, Thomas, $100,000. The account states that these brothers were poor farmer boys at Wenham (sic), and that they "accumulated their money in trade and speculation." Rogers, Zadoc, $100,000. Inherited. Farmer. Old bachelor. Southwick, Royal, $100,000. Small portion by inheritance and marriage. Manufacturer. "Smart, enterprising man. Bene\olent where he likes, and this quality in him is often rendered more active by a very benevolent wife." Tyler, Jonathan, $100,000. "Commenced poor. Accumulating by say- ing 'No.' Obtained an acre in the heart of Lowell for a mere trifle many years ago, and would never sell an inch of it." Whipple, 01i\-er M., $200,000. "Commenced as a common hand in a ]30wder mill. Came to Lowell with pack on his back. Is now an extensive powder manufacturer." Wright, Nathaniel, $100,000. Lawyer and former mayor. "His wife is very benevolent, and he 'don't object to it'." Wyman, William W., $150,000. "Mostly inherited." Considerable interest in literary production has always charac- terized Lowell families. Apart from the authors and editors of the "Lowell Offering." which excited Charles Dickens' admiration, there 278 HISTORY OF LOWELL were, as elsewhere noted, several writers of reputation living in the city at one time and another before iS6o. One of the most prominent of these, socially, was Mrs. Jane Ermine Locke, for some years a corre- spondent of the "Boston Daily Journal" and "Daily Atlas" and author of many magazine poems and special articles. Mrs. Locke was friendly with most of the literary workers of what is now called the "golden age of .American literature" — Whittier, Bryant, Poe, N. P. Willis, Mrs. Sigoin"nc}\ Mrs. Osgood and many others. When Poe came to Lowell in 1848 to deliver his lecture on "Poetic Principle," he was entertained at Mrs. Locke's home and was introduced to many of her friends. The poet Whittier's residence in Lowell was lirief. It resulted in a little hook of impressionistic word pictures. When American Drama Was at Its Best — During the great age of the American drama; that is between about 1840 and the ad\'ent of vaudeville in the eighties. Lowell had certainly better theatrical enter- tainments than are now vouchsafed it liy the New York managers. Boston was then far more important, relatively, in the theatrical world than it is to-da}', and as the nearest large town tn the Hub, Lowell was often fa\'ored with the presence of the greatest contem- porary actors and actresses. Much of the old-time prejudices against theatres survived, and entertainments were sometimes perforce given under disguises that were as transparent as is the n?me of "sacred concerts" more lately ai)plied to Sunday evening \ariety shows. Both amateur and profes- sional drama, nevertheless, was familiar to such of the Lowell public as liked to see plays. A particularly instructive chapter of Lowell history is concerned with the attempts to maintain here a stock company generally similar in cjuality to the celebrated Boston Museum Stock Company. The plan started in 1840, when Daxid Kimball, of Boston, brought to a room in Wyman's Exchange a collection of curiosities from Green- wood's old New England Museum. In Lowell, as at the New England cajiital, the "educational value" of the "curios" e.xhiliited was relied upon to overcome the antipathy of many people toward the dramatic entertainment to which the admission fee also entitled the ticket holder. The curinsities in this "museum" consisted of objects of natural historv, oil paintings, engravings, wax figures and other works of art. It cost twelve and a half cents to enter. Minors were not ad- mitted unattended. The Kimlialls did not long continue their interest in this venture, and in 1845 they sold the entire collection and fixtures to Noah F. Gates for $3,000. This gentleman at once removed the curios, improved the theatri- cal accessories, obtained a license and engaged six or seven profes- THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 279 sional people among whom were George W'yatt, Mary Gannon and Master ATeyer. Adelaide Phillipps, opera singer, and Freeman, the giant, were secured as special attractions. Under such auspices the house at once began to draw sizable audiences. Then, in 1846. Mr. Gates aroused, as Cowley puts it, "strong in- dignation in Zion." by leasing lor his theatre the building formerly owned by the First Freewill Baptist Society, on the site of the present Hildreth building at Merrimack Square. Despite initial opposition the place was fitted up as a museum and theatre and was opened on No- vember 24, 1846. with a company frimi the Boston Museum, which in- cluded Mr. and Mrs. G. C. Germon, George E. Locke, Messrs. Davis, Currier and Rogers, I*'. W. Germon, Mr. and Mrs. Altemus, Mr. and Mrs. Bryant, Mrs. C. Groves, Mrs. Perkins, Miss Downs, Messrs. J. Brooks Bradley, Robinson, W. F. Johnson and Warner. The opening piece, appropriately, was "Raising the Wind." The whirlwind followed. The anti-theatre forces put pressure on the city government and the manager was forbidden to give any more exhibitions, the license for 1847 I'eing revoked. As a parting j)erform- ance on the last day of 1846 Mr. Gates had a stellar attraction in the person of Tom Thumb in a play called "Much and Little.'' Friends of the American drama, however, were not wanting in Lowell, and in the first four days of 1847 thev circulated a petition, urging that Mr. Gates' license be restored. This secured upwards of 2.200 names. The city council yielded to the point of holding a hear- ing. The petitioners engaged Hnn. Thomas Hopkinson, one of the most distinguished lawyers of the city. The case against the drama was presented by two clergymen, Messrs. Thurston and True, who based their argument solely "on Bible grounds." Manv of the council were "professors." but the petitioners won a qualified victors-. .\ license was granted on condition that the house close at ten-thirty and "that moral plays only should be produced." Thenceforward, despite recurrent fires that every now and then threatened to bankru])t the management. Lowell for a number of years saw some of the best actors of the time who would come down from Boston for a week's engagement, playing to the support of the stock company The enterprise in 1850 was regularly incorporated with a capital of $60,000, and with the following officers : President, Noah F. Gates ; clerk, W. A. Richardson ; treasurer, G. L. Pollard ; directors, the foregoing and B. H. Weaver, F. A. Hildreth, A. B. French and Henry Reed. The prices were increased to fifty cents for the box seats and reserved seats. On May 10, 1850, was presented "William Tell," with Joseph Proctor in the title role. The week following came I\lr. and Mrs. McFarland and Mrs. Nichols in the "Wife and Clau- dare." A notalile week in September, 1850, was given by Junius 28o HISTORY OF LOWELL Brutus Bouth, tlit-u sixty years old, presenting Richard IL and other Shakespearean pieces. In November of that week Mr. and Mrs. J. W. Wallack gave several classic plays, and Mr. and Mrs. Dibdin Pitt appeared in Charles XII. and Hamlet. George E. Locke, J. B. Booth and Charlotte Cu>liman succeeded one another as poi:)ular \isitors. In 1851 the director manager discharged his old company and engaged a new one, having as its principal members: Mr. and Mrs. W. L. Ayling, Mr. and Mrs. H. M. Herbert, Mr. and Mrs. xM. A. Tyr- rel, Messrs. Steele, Lubey, Joyce, Howe, Mrs. Groves Rainforth, Misses Steele and Parker. Professor Herman Eckhardt was signed as leader of the orchestra. There may have been local feeling regarding the discharge of the former company. It is recorded, at all events, that the new organiza- tion "never were the favorites, nor did they do the business ot the original one." The house was regularly open, however, until Sepiem- ber 30, 1853, when a fire of unknown origin gutted the place. Nothing daunted, the owners rebuilt the theatre at an expense of nearly $5,000 and reopened on January 2, 1854. with W. L. Ayling as manager and with a company comprising Mrs. Ayling. J^lrs. Forbes, Mrs. Bryant, Messrs. Kames, Linden. Madigan, Ka\anaugh. Benson and others Such pieces were presented as "London Assurance," "Raising the \\ ind," "Uncle Tom's Cabin," "The Loan of a Lover," "The Lady of Lyons," "The Spectre Bridegroom" and various Shake- spearean dramas. Mr. Gates personally resumed the management in October, 1854. In that season several famous visitors played at the house. A drama entitled "The Five Masks," written by a local ama- teur, was staged successfully. The stock company's season closed the latter part of April, but several traveling shows rented the house dur- ing the summer season. In November, 1855, the house reopened under a new management which Mr. Gates soon displaced. In the second week of December, Mr. Wallack brought Shakespearian roles. Then came Mrs. \'incent in "The Merchant of V^enice." She was followed by the National Theatre Company of Boston, who were playing, when on January 30, 1856, another fire broke out and completely destroyed the playhouse. It was not rebuilt and thus passed Lowell's most famous and artistically meritorious stock company. During its pros- perous period, so Cowley states, it employed an average of thirty people at salaries aggregating about $300 a week, which certainly would not figure out at a high average. Amateur theatrical organizations were fairly acti\-e in Lowell prior to the Civil War. In 1836 some thirty young men of the city formed a Thespian Club to give gratuitous entertainments in the former Lowell street theatre, for which a license had been refused to professionals by the THE ANTE-BELLUM CITY 281 selectmen of the town of LliwcII. This association contained at least one member who later became a distinguished stage person, J. Brooks Bradley. Other locally prominent performers in its exhibition were Perez Fuller, John Wellington. John Sweetzer, Moses \\'inn. William T. G. Pierce, Luther Conner, Joseph Ripley, Kelsey Moore, Miss Wil- lis. Miss Seymour. Miss Eaton. Perhaps the first plav to be written in Lowell was staged by the Thes]jians. one based on the story of Henrv \T. and written by Mr. Clapp. one of the high school teachers. The performances of the association soon created a debt, and as a means of liquidating this an admission fee of twenty-five cents was charged. When presently the members found themselves out of debt, thev were so pleased that they decided to disband. The example of the stock company a little later presumably stirred up new interest among Lowell amateurs, for in the late forties and fifties numerous dramatic performances, pantomimes, dioramas and other forms of entertainment were offered at City Hall, Merrimack Hall, Concert Hall. Classic Hall. Wentworth Hall Welles Hall. Em- pire Hall. Huntington Hall, Jackson Hall, Central Hall and Mechanics' Hall. Advertised by handbills and not usually reported in the news- papers of the period, the records of these performances are quite meagre. One of the few that got considerable publicity was the per- formance given December 14, 1853. by the Aurora Club, which had engaged a hall in a building at Merrimack and Prescott streets. About two hundred people were in attendance. Just as the play began the whole floor gave way, dropping to the story below, fortunately without a panic which might have caused the loss of lives. Most of the plays written in Lowell during the first decades — and for that matter during subsequent years — have gone into deserved oblivion. One very famous, if not highly meritorious piece which was dramatized in Lowell, is "Ten Nights in a Bar-room." made over from T. S. Arthur's novel of that name by \\'illiam \\'. Pratt. It had its premiere in the nearby city of Lawrence. Mid-Century Musical Offerings — Much of the best music in Lowell three-quarters of a century ago. as well as subsequently, has been given in connection with church services. Amateur help was commonly offered, for the day of high-priced organists and singers did not arrive until after the Rebellion. In Atkinson \'arnum's reminiscences of the oldest church within the present city limits, the West Dracut church at Pawtucketville. reference is made to an orchestra which was quite famous before the society in 1850 purchased a modern organ. Among the instrumental- ists Vi'ere Zadoc Lew, of the family of colored people from Groton, who have already- been mentioned in connection with their musical serv- 282 HISTORY OF LOWELL ices in the Revulutioiiary army, this particular Mr. Lew Iteinc^ "quite a cclehrated ])layer, ior his day, on a bassoon and other wind instru- ments ;" Nathaniel Varnum, Jeremiah Varnum, Orford R. Blood. John T. SpofFiird. and Gordon F. Tucker (players u])on the iiass viol) ; Oli- ver P. Varnum. Rufus Freeman. Jnhn Cutter, Joseph Merrill, Rapha W. Sawyer, A. C. Varnum. violinists; Adrastus Lew, clarionet; Cof- fern Nutting, trombone. The society also had a choir led for many years by Henry Osgood, a powerful bass singer, whose services were so approved that he was jiaid a small salary l)y a member of the con- gregation. Art and the Exposition of '51 — The instincts that demand art are never entirely repressed and they were no more sadly perverted in Lowell of the early Victorian decades than elsewhere in North Amer- ica — possibly, indeed, in some respects they were rather less absurdly manifested than in most communities. It is amusing, nevertheless, to review the artistic features of such an attem]5ted exposition of the beautiful and pictures(|ue as was brought together in one section of the great Mechanics' Fair of the autumn of 1851. That was the year of the first of the large international eximsitions in London which to the few who were truly critical revealed strikingly the downward tendency of the arts, Init which was hailed by the un- thinking as a wonderful exhibition of the superior taste of modern times. The fame of the London show undoubtedly led to efiforts to make an exceptionally striking exposition of art and manufactures at Lowell. The collections in the "Cotton Palace," or "Pitch])ine Palace" as it was humorously called, were possibly of about the same grade of artistic achievement as those in the celebrated Crystal Palace in England. The entries, as one to-day follows an accoimt that was published serially in the "Daily Vox" of September and October. 1S51. are often of a sort to raise an indtdgent smile. The vestibule, which was intended to be thoroughly impressi\'e, contained several of the portraits with which the present generation is familiar: The good honest, workmanlike likenesses of John Lowell, y\bbott Lawrence, Nathan Appleton and other fathers of- the town. They, at least, were dignified and imposing. Here, too, was a great plain block of marble, to be sent by the ladies of Lowell for incorpora- tion in the Washington monument, and suitably inscribed with lines written bv Mrs. Elisha Huntington : From the Ladies of Lowell. Massachusetts : Where Iiulustry her grateful tribute pays. To Him whose valor won us prosperous days. THE ANTE-BELLUAr CITY 283 "Over the above," commented the "Vox" chronicler, "sits a neat case of patented Tooth Powder, looking very nice, by Dr. E. C. Dale, of Boston. As there is no special description of its excellences, as the Doctor does not ad\'ertise in the "Daily Vox," we pass this by without further remark." The section of the exposition gi\-en over to objects of art. anti<|uity and curious interest, as opposed to the machinery and manufactured goods in the textile section, must have presented an astonishing med- ley of the genuinely artistic handicrafts of the colonial jieriod, the de- based contemporary "fancy-work" and exhibits of purely commercial character. In juxtaposition, in the "Vox's" story, one finds such items as these : 996 — A most formidable looking body of defective masticators ex- tracted by Dr. S. Lawrence, Lowell. One can almost hear a thousand agonized groans, issuing from these relics of wretchedness. 409 — A very large Picture of Washington, wrought in worsted by Miss Laura N. Andrews, Lowell. It is an admirable piece of work, and attracts much attention and deserved praise. Here is a continuation of the running narrative and critical expo- sition : Say 868, a love bouquet of wax flowers — enough — sight more natural than real flowers — by Miss L. Haynes. The accomplished and judgmatical reporter of the Courier says it is the best specimen of wax work in the fair. We dare not be so bold — but it is really lovely. To close this case, we take No. 723. Four admirably executed cameos, all likeness from life, by Miss Marguerite Foley, Lowell — -cer- tainly a most artistic proof of that young lady's talent and skill, in this delicate and difficult branch of sculpture. These specimens, as far as we are able to criticise, will bear com]5arison with any work of this kind we ever saw. They are really first rate. The cameos contributed by Miss Foley, it is safe to assume, were among the most really meritorious works of art in the exhibition, for the later career of this yoimg woman was quite distinguished. Two more examples of the art criticism of 1851 will suffice; the latter entry, introducing one of the earlier and ambitious productions of the late Jonathan Bowers, whose round stone house on \\'anna_- lancet Hill was, and is, one of the architectural freaks of the Com- monwealth : 274 — Another excellent crayon drawing by Miss Emeline Colcord, Lowell. Emeline should continue her practice. 790 — This, probably, is the most ingenus [sic] specimen of cun- ning and patient labor upon a mere fancy article, in the whole Fair. It is a Mosaic Centre Table — at least, that is the imperfect description 284 HISTORY OF LOWELL in the Catalogue ; for it is of Mosaic (of wood) glass, shell, gilt, pearl, and we can hardly say what else. The maker, Mr. Jonathan Bowers, of this city, is said to have received no regular mechanical education — but the work shows that he has a thorough knowledge of every branch, requisite to produce this rare and costly table, in the perfection of mechanic art. It is said that $1,000 — the News says $2,000 — have been refused for this beautiful piece of work ; but w-e do not know what credit belongs to the stories. The thousand dollars is a large sum of money, for so small an article of furniture — more, even, than we could, ourself, flush as we are, afford to pay. Specific examples like the above of the sort of taste prevailing in mid-century Lowell are perhaps worth citing, if only to prevent senti- mentalizing this era of national and local history, as some antiquarians are already bidding us do. .Vrt of a certain sort was publicly exhibited during several years in the old Lowell Museum, the annals of which have already been given in jiart. As in the case of the Boston Museum, the collections of art and curiosities were of the nature of a blind, to help overcome the aversion which many of the puljlic then had for theatrical ])erform- ances. The exhiliits were of a sort to make a really esthetic sou! shud- der, if one may judge from such advertisements as the subjoined, which appeared in the "Vox Populi'' of March 26, 1842: ( LOWHI.I. AfuSF.UM ) Corner of Merrimack and Central Streets The public are respectfully informed that the above Institution, having received many valuable additions and having been entirely refurnished and renovated throughout, is now open day and evening for the reception of visitors. The collection, which embraces a large variety of specimens of Natural History, Painting, Engraving, Statu- ary, Wax-work and Curiosities, is perfectly in order and so arranged as to impart much instruction and amusement. Among the objects of real interest are fourteen large Scriptural paintings of the Life and Sufferings of our Saviour, the Musical Androides, Hall of Industry, Military Androides, Elephant Horatio, Ourang-Outang, double Lamb, etc., etc. BS^ Just added, the great picture of the Death of Abel, which has always been considered an exhibition alone. Surmounting the building is an Observatory which commands an extensive view of the city. Ladies and Families are infi:)rmed that the strictest order is main- tained and that they can with perfect propriety visit the Museum with- out the company of a gentleman. F. G.ATES, Superintendent. Bg^ Boys are not admitted unless accompanied by their parents or guardians. CHAPTER X. Lowell in the Civil War. '['he alertness of Lowell thn iu.<;hi mt the crisis that was precipi- tated when several of the sla\-e-holding States undertook to leave the Union, was typical of a community in which young and vigorous peo- ple still predominated. At no other period of its history has the city so consistentl}' taken National prominence as during the years 1861- 65. Lowell was first in several episodes of the war and lagged in nothing that was required for successful prosecution of the conflict. So far as the struggle was caused by the slavery cjuestion, Lowell, it must be conceded, was, up to the outset of the war, far from being a community united in opposition to the pretensions of the Southern autocracy. Except, indeed, for a few people who were regarded as cranks, the whole North, as Wendell Phillips once put it, "was choked with cotton dust," and a manufacturing city, in especial, whose pros- perity was bound up in a plentiful supply of raw cotton, and whose leading business men had close relations with the South, was unlikely to be a hotbed of anti-slavery agitation. The lalioring classes as well as the em])loyers were often hostile to the efforts of abolitionists, feel- ing that, as Oneal says, "division along sectional lines delayed the coming of the solidarity of all workers North and South." So that, although the pre-Lowell district, as we have seen, had in Squire John Varnum and General Joseph Bradley Varnum two of the earliest American protagonists of comjilete human freedom, the city of i860 was bv no means a unit in resisting the encroachments of feudal slav- er}- upon the freer institutions of the North. The "big business" of the day, it may 1)e added, was generally averse to interfering with the .South's "peculiar institution." In the cotton industr}- dividends were quite dependent upon a regular supply of the basic material of the manufacture. It is a safe conjecture that many of the mill men whose ]iroperties were at Lowell would have echoed the sentiments of Nathan .'\ppleton, one of the city's founders, as expressed in an apologetic letter of December 15, i860, to a Charles- ton man with whom he had business dealings. "It is evident," wrote Mr. Appleton, "that the South is in a state of great excitement, a feel- ing of extreme indignation toward 'the North, which has been produced in great measure by the abuse of the South poured forth in speeches and letters by the inore extreme of our politicians. But it is a great mistake to suppose that these represent the feelings of the masses in the North or even in New England. Every man of common sense knows that the abolition of slavery, if desirable, is an utter impossi- bility, and there is no such thing as a general hatred of the South " 286 HISTORY OF LOWl'lLL While the Bostcm manufacturers no duuht expected that the Na- tional trouble would blmv over, they shrewdly undertook tn prejjare against it as far as was possible in the weeks between President Lin- coln's election and his inauguration. It was reported on January 18 that the manufacturing companies were buying largely of raw cotton and storing it for future use. "One corporation has lately made, in the purchase of a cargo of this article, enough to ])ay its last semi- annual dividend. The different railroad tracks to the various corpora- tions in the citv are daily covered with cars loaded with cotton." This foresight was responsible for some nf the mills continuing to operate at or near capacity for many weeks after the war had reduced ship- ments t(.j practically nothing. Tliat business was good at the liegin- ning of iSfji was attested by "Milo," the "Boston Journal's" corres- pondent, will) told his readers that "notwithstanding Southern poli- ticians and newspa])ers are ])roclaiming that the working classes of the north are on the brink of starvation, business is as good in this city as it usually is at this season." Conditions in Lowell at Outbreak of the War — .Miout to complete its fourth decade as a factory city, Lowell had no reason to desire any- thing Init the preservation of peace. The census of 1S60 showed that the city had reached a i)0|)ulation of 36,827, and an assessed valuation of $20,894,207. The effects of the ])anic of 1857 had jiassed and times were reasonably good. Normally the development of the city should have gone forward during the next half decade without unusual excite- ment or serious industrial depressions. Municipal politics continued on a high jjlane. City (ifficers for the year 1861 were elected toward the close of i860 as folliiws: Mayor, Benjamin C. Sargent; aldermen, Samuel T. Manahan, Jonathan P. Folsom. James \Vatson, W'illiam f. i\lorse, Hocum Hosford, Aldis L. \\'aite, Sager Ashwnrth, William S. Cardner. The new mavor was one of the business men of good grade who frequentlv stood for office in ante-bellum Lowell. He was a bookseller by trade, whose ])lace of business in one of the rented stcires of City Hall is ])leasurably remembered by older Lowell jieople of studious tastes. A native of LTnity, New Hampshire, he had come to Lowell in 1 831), at the age of sixteen, to serve as clerk in the bookstore of his brother-in-law, Abijah Watson. In 1843 he went to New York, where for three years he was employed in a book and publishing concern. Retm-ning to Lowell he started a business of his own in Central street, which was later removed to the City Building. He was a member of the common council for five years in the fifties, during three of which years he was its president. As mayor he was a f|uiet, efficient official, who did what was expected nf him in times of crisis and emergency He died March 2, 1870 ]N THK CU'IL WAR 287 Political conditions were otherwise fa\orabIe in Lowell, as well as other Massachusetts comnuinities. The State election of i860 had provided an unusually able and energetic government. John A. An- drew, destined to be known as the War Governor, was then chosen for the first time In the Legislature, which met on January 2, 1861, Wil- liam Claflin. of Newton, was president of the Senate; John A. Good- win, of Lowell, Speaker of the House of Representatives. Abolition of the Toll Bridge — A local happening of the winter that preceded the war. vied in excitement with the National situation. Resi- dents of Pawtucketville, the West Dracut and of the Pawtucket street section of the city, late in i860, made a final and successful effort toward abolition of the toll nuisance on Pawtucket bridge. At a meeting in Cambridge of the Middlesex county commission- ers on January i, 1861, a petition of Peter Sullivan Coburn and others to lay out Pawtucket bridge as a public highway was considered. Simultaneously a petition was prepared and submitted to the Legis- lature urging a special act to enable the city of Lowell and the town of Dracut to support the bridge jointly and justly between them. These petitions were duly granted. The joint juliilation of Lowell and Dracut on the occasion of the abolition of tolls on the Pawtucket bridge occurred, fortunately, just before the National crisis had become so acute as to absorb the atten- tion of serious-minded people. Through some one's initiative a public meeting in Huntington Hall was called for February 9 to consider whether it would be desirable to have a celebration in honor of the liberation of the bridge. It was the unanimous sense of the assembly that such celebration would be desirable, and a committee of Lowell citizens was chosen as follows: .\lfred Gilman, E. B. Patch. Levi Sprague. James Watson. W. G. Wise, ^^■illiam McFarlin. H. M. Hooke, G. F. Sawtell, J. U. Gage. Dracut was to be represented by Asa Clement, J. B. V. Coburn, Joseph Chase. C. B. X'arnum and George W. Coburn ; Pelham by K. M. Marsh, and Tyngsborough by C}-rus Butterfield. It was arranged that the ceremonies at the bridge should take place on February 20 follow- ing, and that there should be exercises in Huntington Hall on Wash- ington's birthday. Accordinglv, on the 20th of Feliruary. in a driving snowstorm, a crowd gathered around the ma}or of Lowell and others of the city government, the selectmen of Dracut and other dignitaries, while the treasurer of the city and town respectively paid over four thousand and two thousand dollars to the count}- treasurer, who added a check for six thousand dollars and ])resented the whole amount to Artemas Holden, treasurer of the bridge company. The papers were signed at ten forty-five, whereupon County Com 288 HISTOrn' OF LOWELL missioner Huntress declared the bridge a free public highway. Three cheers were given, the nearby church bell was pealed and thirty-four salutes were fired from a nine-pound gun, which had been brought to the river bank. Then the toll gate w'as hitched behind a sleigh in which rode William McFarlin and Peter Sullivan Coburn, who had lieen the jjrime movers in the agitation to free the bridge, and who were thus the first to have the right to cross it without paying toll. Behind them came members of the celelirated Lew family, playing Yankee Doodle on sundry instruments. Thus ended the services of Toll Collector Proctor, who had held up "teams" and foot passengers fur twenty-nine years. Mr. Holden, during nearly as manv years, had been watchdog of the corporation's finances. The bridge had been privately owned and managed since 1792. The celebration on the 22nd in Huntington Hall l)rought to Lowell a big gathering of sleighs from Dracut. Tyngsborough and the south- ern towns of New Hampshire, There was music by the Otto Club and the Hall Brass Band, singing by Perez Fuller, and addresses by nota- bles. The sole disa])pointment was that a poem which had been widely heralded as forthcoming from a former resident now in the West failed to reach the committee in time to be read. With the opening of Pawtucket bridge as a highway, Lowell citi- zens had free access to thirty-one bridges in addition to those of the manufacturing corijorations. Of these bridges the city owned four- teen, the Locks and Canals Comjiany thirteen and the railroad com- panies four. Li the midst of the cit_\"s ])eaceful life, which was but little ruffled by the exciting election of November, iSOo, it began to be e\'ident by the first of the new year that momentous events were on their way. Preparations against a great emergency that was \-isibly approaching were not wanting in Lowell. Officers of the Sixth Massachusetts Regiment, several of whose companies were composed of Lowell men, met on January 21 at the .A-mcrican House to "arrange for future con- tingencies." Thriiugh M.'ijor B. F. Watson a resolution was presented and unanimously adopted, as follmvs: "Resolved, That Colonel Jones be authorized and recpiested, forthwith, to tender the services of the 6th regiment t(i the commander-in-chief and legislature, when such service may become desirable, for the purposes contemplated in Cen- eral Order No. 4." This resolution was read shortly afterwards in the State Senate by General Benjamin F. Butler. It was also sent to Gov- ernor Andrew and by him mentioned in the following message of Jan- uary 22 ti) the Legislatm-e : "I transmit herewith, for the information of the General Court, a communicaticjn offering to the Commander-in- Chief and the Legislature the services of the Si.xth Regiment. Third Brigade, Second Division of the Volunteer Militia of the Common- IN THE CIVIL WAR 28g wealth, which was this day received by me from the hands of Brisja- dier General Butler." This message from the Lowell meeting- was duly noticed l)y the Legislature, which, on January 23, passed the following resolve: Whereas, several States of the Union have through the action of their people and authorities assumed the attitude of rebellion against the National Government ; and whereas, treason is still more exten- sively diiifused ; and whereas, the State of South Carolina, having first seized the Post Office, Custom House, moneys, arms, munitions of war and fortifications of the United States, has by firing upon a vessel in the service of the United States, committed an act of war; and whereas, the forts and property of the United States in Georgia, Ala- liama, Louisiana and Florida have been seized with hostile and treason- able intention ; and whereas. Senators and Representatives in Congress avow and sanction these acts of rebellion, therefore. Resolved, that the Legislature of Massachusetts, now, as always, convinced of the inestimable value of the Union, and the necessity of preserving its blessings to ourselves and our posterity regard with un- mingled satisfaction the determination evinced in the recent firm and ])atriotic special message of the President of the United States to ajjply and faithfully discharge his constittitional duty of enforcing the laws and preserving the integrity of the Union, and we proffer him, through the Governor of the Commonwealth, such aid in men and money as he may require, to maintain the authority of the National Government. Resolved, that the Union-loving and patriotic authorities, repre- sentatives, and citizens of these United States whose loyalty is endan- gered or assailed by internal or external treason, who labor in behalf of the Federal Uni(jn with unflinching courage and patriotic devotion, will receive the enduring gratitude of the American people. Resolved, that the Governor Ije requested to forward, forthwith, copies of the foregoing resolution to the President of the United States and the Governors of the several States. Certain defects in preparation among the Lowell companies were suggested in a letter which their colonel addressed to Governor An- drew early in February. His communication follows: Boston, Feb. 5, 1861. To His Excellency, the Commander-in-Chief: At our interview this morning, you requested me to put the mat- ter which I wished to communicate in writing. In accordance there- with, I make the following statement as to the condition of my com- mand, and take the liberty to forward the same directly to you, passing over the usual channel of communication for want of time. The Sixth Regiment consists of eight companies, located as fol- lows, viz.: four in Lowell, two in Lawrence, one in Acton and one in Boston, made up mostly of men of families, "who earn their bread by the sweat of their brow," men who are willing to leave their homes, families, and all that man holds dear, and sacrifice their present and future as a matter of duty L-19 290 HISTORY' OF LOWELL P'our cnnipanifs of the regiment are insufficiently armed (as to quantity) with a serviceable rifle musket; the other four with the old musket, which is not a safe or serviceable arm, and requiring a differ- ent cartridge from the first, which would make confusiim in the dis- tribution of ammunition. Two Companies are without uniforms, having worn them out and were proposing to have new ones the ensuing Spring. Six companies and the band have company uniforms of different colors and styles, but insufficient in numbers, and which are entirely unfit for actual service, from the fact that they are made of fine cloth, more for show and the attractive appearance of the company on parade than for any other purpose, lieing cut tight to the form and in fashionaljle style. 1 would (after being properly armed and equipped) suggest our actual necessary wants, \iz. : a caj), frock coat, pantaloons, boots, overcoat, knapsack, and blanket to each man, of heavy serviceable ma- terial, cut sufficiently loose and made strcfngly, to stand the necessities of the service. Such is our position, and I think it is a fair representa- tion of the condition of most of the troops in the State. Their health and efficiency depend greatly upon their comfort. My command is not able pecuniarily to put themselves in the nec- essary condition, nor should they, as matter of right and justice, be asked so to do, even were they able. What is the cost in money to the State of Massachusetts, when compared to the sacrifices we are called ujjon to make? Respectfully, Edw.vrd F. Jones, Colonel Sixth Regiment. P. S. — I would also suggest that it would rerpiire from ten to four- teen days as the shortest possible time within which my command could be i)tit in marching order. The watchfulness with which the officers of the Sixth Regiment looked after details of equipment undoubtedly explains in large [lart the priority of this Bay State regiment in taking the field. Tliese men were descendants in spirit as well as lineage of the minute-men of Lexington Oircen. General Butler's "First Aid" to the Union — The \ery real con- Irihutions which the militant attorney of Lowell made to the efficient conduct of the war in its initial stages have jierhaps n(_)t been exag- gerated in the accounts given by himself and others in the Butler correspondence that was published for the first tinxe in 11)17. General Butler's early and effective pleading for preparation in the Bay State was noted in the address which General Edward F. Jones, commander of the Massachusetts Sixth Regiment, made before the Loyal Legion in New York, May 13, 1911. A report of this address states that "on 14 T>in-. 1861, General Butler, who was in command of the Third Brigade, Mass. Vol. Militia, called u])on Col. Jones, commanding the Sixth Regiment (himself) and requested that he (Jones) go with him (Butler) to see Gov. Andrew, remarking: 'Andrew and I are not very good friends, and you have more influence IN THE CI\"IL WAR 291 with him than I have. I want to impress upon him (Andrew) the necessity of having some troops ready to meet the emergency which I know is coming. The South is attempting secession, and if the North is not ready, thc}- (the South) will get an advantage which it will be difficult for us to overcome.' " General Butler himself committed to writing his memory of the occurrences of this winter in a letter to General A\'illiam Schnuler under date of July 10, 1870. Schouler, it should be noted, as editor of the Bay State's war records, had been in position to enhance or depreciate reputations. It might also be noted that he was a former Lowell editor of the "Courier" at a time when that sedate paper was much under fire of the "Vox Populi," to which Butler was a frequent anonymous and markedly sarcastic contributor. The 1870 letter from Washington to this old political adversary was quite conciliary in tone. The significant portion of it begins as follows : That you had espoused the cause of your chief, Governor Andrew, in the unfortunate differences of opinion which arose about the recruit- ment of the New England Division in 1861 I have never thought ground of personal enmity. I expected that fidelity to your com- mander; and therefore when in 1864 you came to my headquarters you will remember that you had no cause of complaint at your recep- tion. I had seen, however, subsequently, indications in your writing up the part that Massachusetts took in the war, of what seemed to me a desire to belittle any efforts of mine in behalf of the country in the great struggle ; but I have never placed pen to paper to correct any supposed misrepresentation or omissions upon your part which fell to my lot. Undertaking for Schouler's information a narrative of his per- sonal interest in the contest that in the winter of 1860-61 was seen to impend. General Butler told how on December 23, i860, he was in attendance at the Democratic convention in Washington which had been planned for at Baltimore in the jireceding spring, had been plan- ned for in the event of the party's defeat at the national election : I found that all hope or desire to reorganize the Democratic party as a union party had passed away, especially from the more advanced of the southern men. They looked for an immediate dissolution of the Union, with homogeneous govenmicnt constructed in the South, with slavery for its corner-stone, with which piecemeal portions of the North should seek admission. I remember Pennsylvania was to be admitted first, as she was deemed likely to ask ; then the North- western states, particularly Illinois, were to be tolled into the fold, that state being desirable because she was the home of the President. No doubt was expressed that Indiana would be among the earliest to take part with the South ; that New York City, if she could not carry the state with her, would be sui)ported in dividing herself as a free 292 HISTORY OF LOWELL city from the rest of the state. When I asked a southern gentleman what was tn he done with New England, he said that she was to be left I Hit in the cold, except perhaps Connecticut, which might well enough l)e a ]Kirt of the state of which New York City was to be the centre. I said the North would fight. He said the North could not fight. Who in the North would fight? I said I would, for one. He replied there will be men enough found at the North to take care at home of all who want to fight the South. I retorted that if we marched South we should leave all the traitiirs liehind us hanging on trees. After this conference Butler returned to Boston, where he arrived on January 3. convinced in his own mind that there would be war. He immediately saw Governor Andrew and explained the need of having the militia ready for possible service at inauguration time. At his suggestion Andrew made a recommendation that the legislature approjiriate $25,000 for overcoats. This measure was attacked as extravag.ant by newspapers of both political parties. "The reply was," llutler writes sarcastically, "on the part of the Democratic pa[iers, — with that charity as tO' motive which ever distinguishes the partisan press, — that General Butler might have advised the Governor to get the overcoats, but as he was a large stockholder in the Middle- sex Mills wdiich made such cloth it was having an eye to business in getting the contract for them to his mill." Events of Feliruary and March, iSfii, arc referred to passingly in Butler's letter. On the evening of April 16 came the order for the Massachusetts troops tn entrain for the defence of Washington. "T went home to Lowell that night from Boston," he writes, "and saw there James G. Carney, Esq., president of the Bank of Mutual Redemption, and my lifelong friend, now deceased, patriotic gentle.- man of far-reaching influence, and said to him: 'You can do me a favor. The Governor of the State has orders to march troops to Washington, and he has no money with which to do it. You can do an act of patriotism and an act of friendship to me at the same time by offering to the Governor a credit of fifty thousand dollars at your bank until tlic legislature can get an appropriation'." Mr. Carney readily assented. With this ofifer in hand General Butler went to the Governor and asked to be detailed as brigadier- general in command. The chief executive asked about ways and means. "Governor," replied General Butler, "I have foreseen and provided for it. Here is an order for a credit of fifty thousand dol- lars on the Bank of Mutual Redemption, and I doubt not every bank in State street will follow the example. Now I very much desire to be detailed to march with these troojis. Two regiments of my brigade are going and they canno: go without their brigadier." He "took the IN THE CIVIL WAR 293 matter under consideration for a short time ; the Major-General of Militia, General William Sutton, was soon after present and strongly urged the same thing, and so did General Oliver, and the Governor detailed me in command of the troop. The rest is history." Lowell observers, meantime, had seen that nothing helpful came out of the peace convention held at Washington in February, 18G1. They read with keen interest President Lincoln's inaugural address of March 4. in which he laid down as basic principles that ( i) the rights of each State to control its domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively should be maintained inviolate; (2) the fugitive slave clause of the constitution and the fugitive slave law should be executed; ('3) the Union is unbroken and perpetual; (4) the laws of the Union should be faithfully executed in all the States. Mr. Lin- coln's decision to send supplies to Fort .Sumter, already in a state of siege, was highl}- ajiproved. Finally, on April 12, came the order from Governor Pickens of South Carolina to bombard the fort. Amidst the flare-up of indignation caused by this open declaration of war Massachusetts at once took a prominent place in the movement to protect the seat of national government at Washington. A spirited demonstration of loyalty was that given by citizens of Irish nativity or parentage on St. Patrick's Day, 186 1. The Ameri- canism of the men who fled from Ireland to escape economic oppres- sion and seek larger industrial opportunities in this country' is almost proverbial. In Lowell it was admirably displayed from the outset. The celebration of March 17 was under the auspices of the Lowell Irish Benevolent Society. Orators of the day were John A. Goodwin, who still felt that "secession will come back like the prodigal son after they have starved in isolation long enough," and General Butler, who announced that he was disposed to offer the olive branch of submission to the traitors with the sword as alternative in case they refused to accept the tender. Among the patriotic "premieres" which may be claimed for Lowell is that the first flag to be unfurled from a church tower was in March, 1861, when the National emblem was floated from the spire of St. Paul's Methodist Church, upon recommendation of Rev. William R. Clark. Churches throughout New Tuigland soon followed this ex- ample. In the middle days of April, the season when, traditionally, wars begin for the United States, Lowell witnessed the departure of the four companies of the faithful Sixth. The non-combatant citizen had read in the papers of the determination of the authorities at the State house to make an immediate demonstration against secession. On April 15, from Adjutant General William Schouler, there came to Colonel Jones at Lowell the preemptory order "to muster your regi- 294 HISTORY OF LOWELL tnent on Boston Common, forthwith, in compliance with a requisition made by the President of tlie United States." A hurry call was rushed to more than thirty towns and villages in the neighborhood of Lowell, in which individual members of the regi- ment lived. On the morning of the i6th u[>wards of 700 officers and men had responded. They assembled in Huntington Hall in whose galleries and about whose doors a host of onlookers had collected. An eloquei:t farewell to the troops was read by the Rev. Amos Blanch- ard, of the Kirk Street Congregational Church. Thence the men entrained in the railway station below the hall. On arrival in Boston they marched to Faneuil Hall, where they were addressed by Governor Andrew in a stirring appeal. The regimental colors were presented to the commanding officer with the words : "We shall follow you w^ith our benediction and our prayers. Those whom vou leave behind you we shall cherish in our heart of hearts." To this sentiment Colonel Jones replied : "You have given me this flag, which is the emblem of all that stands before you. Tt represents my whole command, and, so help me God, I will never disgrace it." Thus departed for the disturbed borderland a regiment that had enrolled several hundred of the young men of Lowell and the vicinity who had in peace times submitted themselves to military discipline against such an emergency as this. It mustered in a total of 699 men. The companies and their captains were as follows : Company A, Na- tional Greys, Lowell, Captain Josiah A. Sawtelle ; Company B, Groton, Captain Clark; Comi^any C, iMechanics Phalanx, Lowell, Captain Al- Ijert Follansbee ; Company D, City Guards, Lowell, Captain James W. Hart ; Company E, Acton, Captain Tuttle ; Company F, Lawrence, Captain Chadbourne ; Company G, Worcester, Captain Pratt ; Com- pany H. Watson Light Guard, Lowell, Captain John F. Noyes ; Com- jjany I, Lawrence. Ca])tain Pickering; Company K, Boston, Captain Sampson; Compan\' L. .'-^tuneliam, Cajjtain Dike. Lowell's Most Celebrated Soldier — The prompt response of the Sixth Regiment called National attention, amongst other things, to the energy and efficiency of the brigade commander, under whose orders this mustering in was effected, and whose further undertakings and ex])loits will necessarily receive much space in any account of Ldwell in the Civil War. The Lowell citizen whose fame was most mitably enhanced by the Civil War, though in many respects it was already great before the conflict began, was Benjamin Franklin Butler, lawyer, politician, statesman, soldier. Reference has been made in preceding chapters to views and acts of this very remarkable man, practically all of whose life was spent in Lowell, a personage of keen, incisive intellect, more likely perhaps to be right in national questions than some of his IN THE CIVIL WAR 295 political adversaries would like td admit: a loyal friend and aggres- sive opponent, one who 'jelieved heartily in the city of his residence and who was generally believed in by his friends and neighbors. General Butler was born at Deerfield. New Hampshire, Novem- ber 5, 1S18. a few months beft.ire his father's death. His grandfather, Zephaniah Butler, had come to the neighboring town of Nottingham from Connecticut. His father. Captain John Butler, had served with the dragoons in the \\'ar of 1S12 and had subsequently commanded a Letter of Marque in the service of Simon Bolivar, the South Ameri- can liberator. He died in the West Indies shortly after Benjamin's birth. The widowed mother, when the boy was ten years old, moved to Lowell, which city he saw for the first time from the crest of Chris- tian Hill. His pride in the Lowell High School, of which he was one of the first pupils, has been attested in his reminiscences of its first graduates. He was consistently a believer in the public school system. After finishing his preparatory course, young Butler entered ^^■aterville College. Maine, from which he was graduated in 1838. He was at this time in somewhat delicate health, but a trip to the banks in a fishing smack built up his ])hysique. He undertook the study of law in the office of William Smith. Lowell, and in 1841 he was admit- ted to the Middlesex county bar. He was meantime learning the ins and outs of the political game. In 1840 he made his first stump speech, in favor of I\lartin \'an Buren. As he entered into the practice of his profession, he soon astonished older men than hiinself by his shrewd- ness and acumen. Politicallv. Mr. Butler's sympathies were with the Democratic party from the outset of his career. At considerable risk of personal reputation, since his adversaries were often ready with charges of demagogism. he espoused the cause of the working class in the new industrial communities of which Lowell was a prototype. He was one of the adx'ocates of a ten-hour law and as a member of the Legislature did much toward shortening the legal working day. He was a dele- gate to each National Democratic convention from 1844 to i860. He first went to the Legislature in 1853. In the same year he sat at the constitutional convention. In 1859 he was one of three Democratic State Senators. In that year he drew up the bill by which the old Court of Common Pleas was abolished and the Superior Court was substituted. At the Democratic convention of i860 he represented constituents who would have liked him to vote for Stephen .\. Doug- las for President. As. however, it was evident that a Northern candi- date would not be accepted. General Butler voted for Jefferson Davis, afterwards President of the Confederacy. When the convention ad- journed from Charleston to Baltimore, IMr. Butler and a few other Northern delegates, and a majority of those from the South, bolted 296 HISTORY OK LOWELL and nominated John C. Breckenridg'e. In 1859 Mr. Butler was the Democratic candidate, and in 1860 was the Breckenridge Democratic candichite fiir tlie Massachusetts Governorship, but was defeated on each occasion. General Butler's natural ability and exi)erience in military mat- ters were mure unusual than his detractors would sijmetimes concede. He joined tlie militia in 1839, as a private in the Lowell City Guard. He served in the ranks for three years. Thence he rose step by step through all the gradations of military rank, and at the outset of the Civil War he held the rank of brigadier-general. On April 15, 1861, he was pleading a case in a Boston court, when an order from the State house was placed in his hands. It stated that the Si.xth Regi- ment should report for National duty on the morrow, the President having just issued his call for 75,000 volunteers. Hastily moving a postponement of the case (which remains postponed to this day), the lawyer soldier took the first train to Lowell to see that evervthing was in readiness for entraining. The Lowell Martyrs in Baltimore — The 1S61 anniversary of the battle of Lexington, as every schoolboy knows, witnessed the first bloodshed of the Civil War. Newsjiajiers of the 20th brought to ex- cited Lowell pciiple fragmentar\- and somewhat inaccurate tidings of an attack made upon the Sixth Massachusetts liy a mob in the streets of Ijaltimore It was known that several men had been killed and others more or less sex'erely wounded. An early report placed among the dead Private Edward Coburn, of Dracut. Facilities for collecting news and handling it over the wire were less well developed then than now. The "stories" carried in the Boston papers of the day after the occurrence seem almost surprisingly meagre and conflicting. \Vhat actually hajipened was revealed to Lowell readers of the "Boston Iiiurnal" a day later, \\hen this newspaper reprinted from the "New York Times" a currected and summarized accoimt which f(il- lows : Through the C(nirtesy of an eye-witness of the disturluince in Baltimore, upon occasion of the passage of the Massachusetts \'olnn- tccrs. we are enabled to give a reliable account of what actually occuned. ;ind at the same time to correct a false im])ression in regard to the number of troops engaged in conflict with the secession mob. It appears that the Massachusetts Regiment occupied eleven cars and arrived safely and in excellent spirits at Baltimore. There was no demonstration made upon their arrival, and the cars were permit- ted to leave the depot with the troops still on board. The cars pro- ceeded c|uickly through the streets of li.altimore on their way to the depot at the other side of the cit\-. and the fears expressed by some of the citizens that an attack would lie made were somewhat allayed. But they had not proceeded more than a couple of blocks before the crowd became so dense that the horses attached to each car were IN THE CIVIL WAR 297 scarcely able to push their way thrciugh. The remaining two cars of the train, containing about 100 men, were cut off from the main body and the men found themselves accompanied by an infuriated mob of over 8,000. These isolated cars were immediately attacked and several of the soldiers had their muskets snatched from them. At this moment news came that the Philadel])hia \'olunteers had arrived, and the re- port excited the mob to a fearful degree. The Massachusetts troops, finding the cars untenalile, alighted and formed a hollow square, advancing with fixed bayonets upon all sides in double quick time, all the while surrounded by the mob — now swelled to the number of at least 10,000 — yelling and hooting. The military behaved admirably and still abstained from firing uperfection of financial arrangements, has never been ex- celled, if ecpialed." The executive committee in charge of this enterprise was: Chair- IX THE CI\'IL WAR 333 man. Mayor Hocuni Hosford ; secretary, W". F. Salmon; E. P. Patch, George Riple\-, H. H. Wilder, Isaac Place, Abiel Rolfe, E. F. Sherman, Jacob Rogers, Mrs. James B. Francis, Mrs. John Nesmith, Mrs. George Hedrick, Mrs. C. P. Talbot, Miss B. Robbins, Miss M. Hinkley. The heads of special committees were as follows : Finance, S. D. Sargeant ; music, Charles Merrill; tables, ^^'illiam P. Brazier; refreshments, O. E. Gushing ; decorations, J. G. Peabody ; flowers, Mrs. John Nesmith ; clothing, H. P. Perkins; police, N. F. Crafts; printing, S. W. Huse. The three days' bazaar and fete in Huntington Hall was markedly- successful in spite of a severe rainstorm that continued during most of the time. There were amusing as well as picturesque incidents. Some complaints were heard to the effect that young ladies in charge of the tables did not gi\e change or bills tendered in payment for articles. One young man asked a girl who seemed loath to give him specie in change to hand him some small articles in its lieu which would always remind him of her. She promptly drew a pickle from a jar and gave it to him. The net receipts from the Sanitary Fair were $4,884.99. When this amount was tendered to the National Sanitary Commission it drew from Dr. Bellows, the well-known Unitarian divine of New York, such a letter of appreciation and of commendation of the Lowell spirit as deserves to reappear in full in any record of the city's achieve- ments. Mr, Salmon had written to Frederick Law Olmsted, then general secretary of the Sanitarv Commission, stating the amount that had been raised and the feeling of the local committee that a part of the fund might properly be disbursed for articles made in Lowell, for which advantageous terms cotild be secured and which would keep the mills running for the benefit of the working class. From New York a few days later came this enthusiastic letter : U. S. Sanitary Commission. New York Agency, 823 Broadway. New York, March 21, 1863. Wm. F. Salmon, Esq., Secretary of Executive Committee of Ladies of Lowell — Sir: — Your favor of the 14th inst. has just been referred to us by the General Secretary of the U^nited States Sanitary Commission. The zeal and liberality of your community have been conspicuous in every hour of the war. The Sanitary Commission has met the Lowell soldiers in many fields ; and among its very^ earliest experi- ences recalls a delightful meeting with your mayor and other citizens at Fortress Monroe, where a Lowell company was admitted into the line with regulars, and proved itself their peer in drill and discipline. Even your repeated contributions to our stock of supplies had not led us to anticipate such a splendid addition as you now offer! You would have been up to the average if }-ou had stopped where you were. You 334 HISTORY OF LOWI'.LL will make it \ ery ilifticult for any cuinimmit}' (tlii> sidt- the Rocky iMountains) to keep |)ace with you, now that you pour four thousand eight hundred and fifty dollars into our treasury! I think we must declare you the banner town in New England. It is perhaps due to the fact that you have a larger proportion of women than of men in your ])opulation : and needles and prayers are the weapons witli which women carry on the war, after they have sent all the men they can s])are (and more) to the front, with guns, and freemen's souls liehind them. \(iur suggestion about the mode of vising the fimd \(iu have raised is perfectly acceptaljle to us. We acquiesce in your view, and request you to transmit half of the amount in a check or draft to our treasurer N. T. Strong, Esq., No, 62 Wall street. New York, and the other half in supplies to ovir Auxiliary, No. 22 Summer street, Boston. As to the nature of the supplies we refer you to that .\uxiliary, on wdiom we draw for certain articles which we must look to communities like vciiu"s in her \'icinity to suji[>ly her depot with. -\sk her what she needs most to meet our calls upon her, and govern yourselves accord- ingly. System is so necessary in our work that you'll apjireciate the reasons of this apparent indirection. With lively gratitude to the ladies and citizens of Lowell, I am, in behalf of the Sanitary Commission, and still more of our sick and wounded soldiers, Your obliged friend and servant, Henry W. Uhllows, President. The Chicago Sanitary Fair closely followed Lowell's. The Bos- ton Fair came in December, 1863, and netted receipts of $153,568.97. Several other communities adopted this Lowell-born plan for assist- ing the National Sanitary Commissit)n. The old Sixth Regiment, now a \'eteran organization, returned to Lowell u])on the expiration of its enlistment on May 30, 1863. As was natural considering that it was the pioneer volimteer regiment a receptiiin was tendered the officers and men in Huntington Hal!. Mayor Hosford, in his address, congratulated the regiment on its achievements. CoK)nel Albert S. Follansbee, who had been with the regiment since the aitair in Baltimore, made appropriate reply. The Sixth's service was not at an end, however, for it again went out for one hundred days. During the protracted \'irginia campaign, which was finally brought to a close by Grant's dogged determination, casualty lists were eagerly scanned in Lowell and many such deaths were noted as liave l)een referred to in the paragraphs on the records of the separate regiments. Boys from the Merrimack valley did a big bit toward winning Gettysburg, toward preventing actual defeat at the Wilder- ness. What Lowell Learned About Fort Fisher — His fellow-citizens were natur;illy much interested in the first and disastrous assault u]ion l^'ort l'"ishcr because of the prominence in it of General Butler and his son-in-law, General Adelbert Ames. Many Lowell friends of the IN THE CIVIL WAR 335 militant lawyer felt, whether rightly or wrongly, that certain leading men of the navy were not altogether ingenuous in foisting upon this one army nfficer the entire blame for the occurrences in front of one of the Confederacy's mightiest strongholds. What readers of the Lowell and Boston newspapers gathered from reports was that on December 13, 1864, General Butler, as part of the strategy planned by Generals Grant and Sherman for ending the war, sailed with seven thousand troops of his department from Fortress Monroe to cooperate with Admiral Porter in an effort to take Fort Fisher, near Wilmington, North Carolina. It was General Butler's suggestion that a steamer loaded with upwards of two hundred barrels of gun powder be driven in as close as possible to the walls of the fort and exploded, with expectation that the walls would be shattered and the garrison paralyzed by the shock. The explosion occurred, but perhaps because the orders were not executed skillfully, inflicted little if any damage upon the Confederates. An attack in force had been agreed upon for the following day, but as the sea ran high the troops were not all landed and those that reached shore gained only a slight success over the opposing outposts. Thereupon General Butler and General Weitzel, his chief engineer, deciding that the fort could not be carried by assault, ordered all the troops who were on shore to re- embark. This fiasco, if such it was, ended General Butler's militaiy career. A second attack on Fort Fisher, three weeks later, carried the place. That, however, the Lowell general's caution was justified by the circumstances of the situation at the time of the first attack has been strenuously maintained by his friends and supporters. Colonel William Lamb, furthermore, who defended the fort, afterwards as- serted in an article on "The Defence of Fort Fisher," that Admiral Porter was quite as much to blame as General Butler for the first failure. As for the retirement General Weitzel, as a qualified engi- neering expert, took, before a Congressional committee on the conduct of the war, the blame of advising General Butler, saying: In the two instances when the enemy assaulted my position the_\ were repulsed with heavy loss. After that experience, with the in formation 1 had obtained from reading and study — for before this wa. I was an instructor at the Alilitary Academy for three years unoei Professor Mahan on these very subjects — remembering all the re marks of the Lieutenant-General commanding, that it was his inten tion I should command that expedition liecause another officer selected by the War Department had once shown timidity, and in face of thi fact that I had been ap])ointed Alajor-General (inly twenty days before, and needed confirmation ; notwithstanding all this I went back to General Butler and told him 1 considered it wduld l>e murder to ordei an attack on that work with that force. I understood Colonel Com stock to agree with me perfectly, although I did not ask him, and Gen- eral Butler has since said that he did. J36 HISTORY OF LOWF.LL Di-s])ite the success which liefell tlie second attack on Fort Fisher when an immense hombarding flotilhi cooperated with a force of some 2,000 sailors and marines and an additional command of 2,400 troops, the committee on the conduct of the war, with Hon. Ben Wade as chairman, reached a conclusion that exonerated General Butler from the charges of timidity and defective judgment. Their conclusion was: "In conclusion your Committee would say, from all the testi- mony before them, that the determination of General Butler not to assault the fort seems to have been fully justified by all the facts and circumstances then known or afterwards ascertained." A full report on the Fort Fisher happenings was rendered to his fellow-citizens I)v General Butler at a reception which was arranged in his honor on the 30th of January, ii%5. The general was loudly ajjplauded in such passages of his address as when he asked whether he ''ought to be hounded down and a price almost set upon my head, like a wolf, l:>ecause I did not order an assault which two of the best engineer officers in the United States service advised me not to make and in reference to which, one of them said to me (I use his very ex- pression). 'If vou order it. General, it will be murder'." Inception of the Ladd and Whitney Monument — The earliest pub- lic announcement nf a plan to honor the last resting place of the first \ictims of the war was made in Mayor Hosford's inaugural address of Tanuary 4, 1S63. In the course of this he asked : "In the border of our cemeterv rest the revered remains of young Ladd and Whitney, the first martvrs to our cause, unmarked the spot, unobserved by the passer-by Ought we not to provide a 'Heroes' Field' where others may sleep, and i)\'er their sacred remains raise heavenward the crystal granite or the polished marlile shaft?" Influenced presumably by this suggestion. Representative J. N. Marshall of Lowell, on April 17th following, introduced a resolution appropriating from the State Treasury the sum of $2,000 toward a suitable monument for Messrs. Ladd and Whitney, on condition that the city of Lowell appropriate a similar amount. This proposal was subsequently accepted by the city government and plans made for a memorial Progress on the Ladd and Whitney monument was noted from time to time by adults and small boys during the winter of 1864-1865. The plans had been drawn by Woodcock & Meacham, Boston. The work of erecting the shaft and laying out the approaches in Lowell was commissioned to Runels, Clough & Company. The memorial was to take the form of a simple granite shaft twenty-seven and one-half feet high. On the plinth of one side were the words: Addison O. Whitney, born in Waldo, Me., October 30th. 18^9, and Luther C Ladd, born in Alexandria, N. H., Dec. 22d, 1843. Marched IX Till-: CI\'II. \\-AR 337 from Lowell in the 6th M. V. Al. to the defence of the National Capi- tal, and fell mortally wounded, in the attack on their regiment, while passing through Baltimore, April 19, 1861. The Commonwealth of Rlassachusetts and the City of Lowell dedicate this monument to their memory, June 17, 1865. On the reverse iilinth is a quotation from Milton's "Samson Ago- nistes :'' Nothing is here for tears, nothing to wail (Jr knock the breast ; no weakness, no contempt. Dispraise or blame, nothing but well and fair And which may quiet us in a death so noble. It was originally proposed to dedicate this monument on the lyth of April, but unexpected delays prevented. Even if ever}thing had been in readiness the National calamity of April 14 would have changed all plans. Victory and the Assassination Thrill the City — Excitement began to run high in the spring of 1865, as it was realized that the end of the war was in sight. C)n April 6 a mass meeting was called in Hunting- ton Hall to celebrate the recent Union successes on the field. Mayor Peabody presided. Fervently patriotic addresses were made by Rev. Mr. Backus, Joseph C. Kiinball, former Mayor Sargeant, and Rev. J. O. Peck. The exercises closed with the singing of "John Brown's Body" by the Glee Club and of "Old Hundred" by the Glee Club and the entire audience. Finally, on the afternoon of April 10, readers of the "Lowell Citi- zen" beheld with delighted eyes, under a representation of the Stars and Stripes, the headlines: "God be Praised! The Morning Cometh. Closing Victory of the \\'ar. Surrender of Lee and his Army." By that token every man. wuman and child knew that, though still tech- nically existent, the Confederacy was really dead ; that it was only a question of a few days before the remnants of the rebel armies must follow the e.xample of their former commander-in-chief. An imme- diate invitation was issued to all citizens to attend another mass meet- ing in Huntington Hall. Again the mayor presented a list of local speakers, Dr. Elisha Huntington, John Wright, James Dean and sev- eral of the resident clergy. On that evening and for two days after, the city rang with rejoicing. Black lines between columns in the newspapers of Ajiril 15, 1865, signified a National tragedy. The news of President Lincoln's assas- sination had reached Lowell. The story which came from Washington over the wires was essentially that with which every school child is now familiar — of the president's attending the theatre to seek a little recreation in a time of especially anxious care ; of the sudden appari- tion of the assassin with his pistol shot and his melodramatic shout of "Sic semjjer tyrannis." Thereupon blackness fell upon the land. I.- 2 338 HISTORY Ol'^ LOWI^LL 'I'he details of tlu- dreadful e\ent at W'ashingtt)!! helung, of course, rather to general than t(j lucal history. An incident of the forenoon in which the news was received in Lnwcll is worth citing as illustrating the tense and overwrought state of ]>ul)lic feeling. In the ]iresence of Daniel S. Greenleaf. a loyal citi- zen, (ine Otis Wright, a merchant who had lately come to the city from New Hampshire, a State then regarded as much of a hotbed of "copperheadism," ventured to ex])ress himself as well satisfied with the assailant's work, adding "words of contempt for the President too brutal for repetition among civilized men." Mr. Greenleaf in indigna- tion reported these utterances in the street and within a short time a crowd of several hundred angry peojjle gathered in front of Mr. Wright's place of business in the Museum Iniilding and demanded his appearance. The man came forward bearing an American Hag and denying that he had said anything disloyal. Mr. Greenleaf. howe\er, pr(.)m[)tly addressed the crowd, rejieat- ing the New Hampshire man"s exact words as he rememljered them and challenging him either to deny or correct them. Then the "cop- jjerhead" hung his head and became too confused to answer. The crowd l)y this time was in ugly mood and it might have fared badly with the man Wright, had not Mayor Peabody arrived on the scene and begged his fellow-citizens to indulge in no rioting, as he under- stood that the offender had already made arrangements to leave the cit\'. Soon after this the assailant of the martyred President's charac- ter left Lowell for good and all, as it is belie\-ed. Solemn services in all the clun-ches on Sunday, the i6th, attest- ed the awed solemnitv that had liefallen the city since the news of the assassination at ^^■ashington. On Thursday, the 20th. appro- ]>riate memorial exercises were held in Ihuitington Hall, with Con- gressman (afterwards Co\-ernor) George S. Bontwell as orator of the occasii m. The Dedication of the Monument — As Powell slowly recovered from the feeling of stunned grief that Walt Whitman so nol)ly expressed in his "Captain, Mv Cajitain," preparations were continued for the dedication which should memorialize the beginning and sig- nalize the end of the long conlbct. It was decided to imveil the Padd and Whitney monument on June 17. fust i)rior to the dedication two portraits of the fallen heroes were exhibited at the store of H. M. Ordway, in Merrimack street. These were the work of Alfred Ordway, of Boston, one of the founders of the Boston Art Club. They were designed, it was announced, to be part of the collection of the "National Gallery of Heroes," for which ambi- tious plans were then under consideration. Credit for commissioning Mr. Ordway to do these portraits appears to have rested with Messrs. IN TIIK CIX'IL WAR 339 Nesmilli aiul Talbot, of Lowell. The pictures were hung in Ilunting'- ton Hall during the dedicatory exercises. Finally, on the anniversary of Bunker Hill battle came the most spectacular celebration Lowell had yet had. In addition to the turn-out of old and young from every street in the city, a crowd estimated at about twenty thousand poured in from the surrounding cities and towns. The long procession through Lowell streets was headed by the Spalding Light Cavalry, closely followed by nine companies of the old Sixth and three companies of the Thirty-third, the latter under the tattered colors which they had lately borne "from .\tlanta to the sea." Then came the sheriff of Middlesex county, the wliole city government of Lowell, various Masonic Ijodies, aged veterans of 1812 and 1845 ''^ carriages; the Independent Order of Cadets, of Boston; officers of the stafT of the Governor of Maryland ; Major General Butler ; the Execu- tive Council of the State of Massachusetts; the chaplain and toast- master : the mayor and aldermen of Boston ; representatives of the Great and General Court of Massachusetts; representatives of the Massachusetts Judiciary; representatives of the governments of Wor- cester and Lawrence, and the selectmen of Groton, Acton and Stone- ham ; former majors of Lowell ; the Lowell Fire Department ; Inde- pendent Order of Odd Fellows; Independent Irish Benevolent Society; Young Men's Catholic Library Association; American Protestant Association ; Lowell Circle of Feniam Brotherhood ; Franklin Zouaves. An incident of the parade was the massing of young women, arrayed in white and waving the flags of the loyal States, in front of the Appleton street house of George F. Willey, music master. These girls sang the national airs which were taken up by the veterans as the}- passed. Residents of the Chapel Hill district had prepared vast quantities of lemonade, which was tendered to the thirsty paraders as there were pauses in the line of march. At one thirty the head of the procession arrived at Monument Square. The subsequent exercises were divided into two parts, fra- ternal and civic. The square at first was made the scene of a Masonic Grand Lodge, ojiened by Most Worthy Grand Master William Park- man, of Boston, who made an eloquent address. The situaticMi was then turned over to the civic authorities. After a prayer by the Rev. Amos Blanchard. Mayor Peabody introduced the orator of the occa- sion, John A. Andrew, Governor of Massachusetts. The ringing periods of the Governor's elaborate resume of Massa- chusett's part in the Ci\-il War were in the best manner of the oratory of the period. It was a supreme effort, worthy of the day on which Lowell and the Bay State were as conspicuous in the eyes of the nation as at any time in the nineteenth century. The speech was printed 340 HISTORY OF LOWELL \'ei"l)atim in a ten-column story of the events of the celebration in the "Citizen," an unusual journalistic feat for the time. As a reminder of its style and substance the peroration, at least, should be given : Let this monument, raised to preserve the names of I, add and Whitney, — the two young artizans of Lowell who fell among the first martyrs of the great rebellion, — let this monument now dedicated to their memory stand for a thousand generations ! It is another shaft added to the monumental columns of Middlesex. Henceforth shall the inhabitants of Lowell guard for Massachusetts, for patriotism and liberty, this sacred trust, as they of Acton, of Lexington, of Concord, protect the votive stones which commemorate the men of April, 'j~,. Let it stand as long as the Merrimack runs from the mountains to the sea ; while this busy stream of human life sweeps on by the banks of the river bearing to eternity its freight of destiny and hope. It shall stand here, a mute, expressive witness of the beauty and the dignity of youth and manly prime consecrated in unselfish obedience to Duty. It shall testify that gratitude will remember, and praise wait on the humblest, who, by the intrinsic greatness of their souls, or the worth of their offerings, have risen to the sublime peerage of Virtue. CHAPTER XI. Lowell, from Civil War to Chicago Exposition. Industrially and socially considered the period from the end of the War of the Rebellion to about the time of the Chicago Exposition and the panic of 1893 forms rather a distinct unit in the history of the city of Lowell. The happenings of these three decades are in marked con- trast to the stirring scenes of the years 1861-65. While progress was steady and continual in many directions this was not a time of sensa- tional developments, of startling achievements or even, perhaps, of so much display of enterprise and initiative as had characterized the first years of the manufacturing community, or has since 1893 marked the conduct of affairs in the city. Pessimism, indeed, concerning the future of Lowell was more rife in the seventies and eighties than it has been since the successful establishment of the Lowell textile school and the continual broaden- ing of the industrial life of the neighborhood by intensive development and specialization among the established manufactures and by further diversification of the local businesses. Reasons for alarm were not wanting; these were easily magnified by those who lacked vision to sense the corrections of evil conditions which were already in prepara- tion. Many of the gravest problems of the twentieth century city first became acute in the last decades of the nineteenth century : deteriora- tion of originally inadequate housing facilities fur the working class; indiiiference to city planning for the future ; neglect of the welfare of newly arrived immigrants ; increasing tolerance of the evils of alcoholism and sex disease ; a spread of coarsening influences in popu- lar amusements and recreations ; a new tendency toward vulgarity and ostentation among some of the well-to-do. Exaggeration of these evils was sometimes practised by orators and writers who felt that the experiment of the high-minded founders of a model manufacturing community was coming to grief ; that Lowell was visibly approaching some such ruin as Kirk Roott had once predicted. The well-ordered town of 1835 had become a city with serious problems by 1885. The compen.sating features were fre- cpiently ignored, for it was not so apparent, as it became thirty years later, that cosmopolitan Lowell has within itself all the elements needed for its own regeneration. A marked change in the racial complexion of the city, and espe- cially of the operative class, was unquestionably the most striking communal development of the post-bcUnm years. It was likewise one 342 HISTORY OF LOWELL whicli frequently caused gloomy, and, as it has turned out, needless fcireboding's. In i8f>5 the mills at Lowell were still filled with young people from \ew England farms, even though this source of labor supply no longer yielded quite so many new recruits as in the first days of the manufacturing cumminiit}". Practically the only "foreigners'" were those using the English language and practising arts of living gener- ally similar to those of the native-born population: the English, Irish and Scots, with a few people from the maritime Canadian provinces. By i8qo, on the contrary, most of the native "Yankees" still left in the factories were elderly yjersons, survivors of former conditions; jjrac- tically all the young men and women were aliens by Ijirth or parent- age, and many of these spoke languages which sounded to the man in the street like jargon. The operative population in the nineteenth centur)' was not so mixed and pol_\'glot as it has since become, Init it was already in visible process of diversification ; it included French, Germans, Swedes, Russians and a few of the Greeks, Syrians and Armenians, who now have large colonies. This tendency toward racial complexity in the laboring population was not, of course, peculiar to any one New England textile center. The national figures ul the nativity of cotton mill employees during three succeeding censuses, tell statistically and quite accurately the story of what was happening in Lowell, as may be seen from the following table : Percentages. Born in U, S. 1870 1880 1890 1870 1880 l8go United States 7i,547 94,oio 9O,.404 64.1 55.6 44.7 British America 7,613 3f>.385 40,(m)o 6.9 21.4 25.5 Ireland 18.713 19.73^ 16.306 6.8 11.6 9.5 Great Britain 16,805 16,237 17,131 10.6 9.6 9.9 Germany 11,214 1,988 3,763 i.i 1.2 2.2 All iitliers 664 1,419 3.587 0.5 0.8 2.1 In exposition of these figures Copeland says, in his valuable book on the cotton manufacture: "In 1870 the Irish predominated among the foreign-born employees in our cotton mills, and the number has re- mained about the same, while the proportion has declined. The num- I)cr of JMiglish and Scotch, likewise, has not manifested much change; the outflow and inflow have balanced. The Irish and particularly the British o]jeratives, however, have moved upward in the scale of em- ployment within the mills. Nearly all of the luiglish are mule spin- ners, weavers, slasher tenders or overseers." The Coming of the French-Canadians — As regards Lowell the overshadowing racial development of the years in question was due to the coming of the French-Canadians. Within one generation descend- ants of Norman and Breton jieasants became so numerous as to give a tone to whole sections of the town. AFTER THE C]\IL WAR 343 The appL-araiice of French-speaking people in Lowell began much earlier than has generally been stated. While it is true that the great exodus from Canadian farms to New England factories did not start until after the Civil War, a considerable number of French families were settled here prior to i860. The first comers, it is understood, were not Canadians by birth, for they were of the New York State French villages situated in the Adirondack region. From this district a few French people found their way to Pittsfield and the Connecticut valley cities and thence to Lowell. The first native American of French tongue, so far as known, to settle in the city was Alaric Mercier, who came in 1845 and who in 1917 was still living. Several others followed in 1848, among them Louis Bergeron, Paul Lesieur, Edouard Courchesne, Joseph Dufresne, H. Dozois, Pierre and Luc Viau, St. Onge Laurence, M. Gobeil, Nar- cisse Remy. Some of these men boarded in a house off Middlesex street, in the rear of the present Richardson's Hotel. Several of them were wood-workers. One was a blacksmith. From 1852 onward their number increased, and during the war as many as 400 enlistments of French Americans were noted. After the war the immigration from French -Canada increased rapidly. Arrived in Lowell the French-Canadians brought with them the characteristic institutions of their Quebec villages. Their priesthood was their own : they did not join in worship with the Irish Roman Catholics. In 1868 was organized a branch of the St. Jean Baptiste Society, which had previously been started in Quebec in 1834 and which was already widespread throughout French-speaking Canada. This society in 1872 had a great celebration of the feast of St. John the Baptiste. The fete was renewed two years later. By 1877 the society had a Lowell membership of nearly 600. Numerous other French societies, lay and religious, were started at later dates. Little Canada, which became the residential quarter of at first a majority of the Lowell French, was an open field prior to the Civil War, situated between the western end of the Lawrence corporation and the Great Bunt in the Merrimack. The location was convenient enough for a colony of mill operatives, to whom carfare would have been a prohibitive consideration. A plan of the Locks and Canals Company to lease house lots in this tract proved to be very profitable to the company. It was not, however, conducive to substantial build- ing. The landlord's one object, only too often, was to realize large returns on an investment which he knew might be impaired by refusal at the end of the stipulated sixteen years to renew the lease. The newcomers, therefore, were housed for the most part in flimsy structures, ranging from renovated horse sheds up to a large wooden "Idock"' containing thirty-two tenements. Some promoters are re- 344 HISTORY' OF LOWELL ported t(i have realized iniineiise profits from their venttires in this district. iMjout 18IS1, according to a credible account, a two and one- half story house on Merrimack street, very decrepit, was sold at auc- tion for ten dollars, the seller who purposed rebuilding on his land, supposing that the old structure would be turned into kindling wood. The new owner, however, had the timbers moved over into Little Canada, spent about $400 on patching them up for occupancy and obtained good paying tenants who gave $480 a year for the quarters. As the land rental was only $40 a year the landlord more than covered the total investment in a year and thereafter had an income exceeding one hundred per cent, on his money. The fire risks were stich, and sanitary conditions so unsatis- factory, that about 1885 there was more or less public disctission of the advisability of condemning the whole quarter and requiring the population to find other homes. Nothing was done collectively, how- ever. The French people themselves, to a certain extent, began to solve the prolilem by moving over into a more substantially Iniilt sec- tion along Moody and Merrimack streets. Increasing Cosmopolitanism of the City — 1 he fortuitous settle- ment of other racial colonies in New England manufacturing towns has been a nujst interesting phenomenon since about 1880. Lowell began early to ha\-e its share, some conservatives maintained more than its share, of the polyglot populations that were seeking oppor- tunity for a livelihood in the New World. The Southern Slavs, who are now so numerous, must have been a mere handful about 1883, when a family of Greek fruit vendors oper- ated a stand in City Hall a\'enue. Even in 1892 lower Market street still had more sakions than coffee houses. The Germans and Belgians, who in these years were flocking to America, rarely came to Lowell. The same thing is true of the Finns, who were beginning to furnish Fitcliluirg manufacturers with their most reliable help. The Swedes, while more inclined to settle in Worcester, made up a small but in- creasing element in Lowell, and there were a few Poles. Toward the end of the designated era, marked expansion of the Jewish colony added to the cosmopolitanism of Lowell. A few- families of German Hebrews had settled in the city before 1880 and had become an integral part of its commercial life. About 1890 the Russian and Polish Jews, manv thousands of whom were coming into the countrv of New York, began to find their way to the Merrimack valley. Apparently there was more or less direction (if their migration. In August, i8()i, the Lowell mill agents received letters from the L'nited Hel)rew Chari- ties of New York, asking if they could ofifer work to Russian Jews, driven from their own country by persecution. "There are many skilled niechanics among their numlicr," the communication stated. AFTER THE C1\TL WAR 345 "as well as families who have some experience and are well fitted to become operatives in mills and factories." This proposal, coming at a time when labor was not particularly well employed, created much antagonism in Lowell as in other New England textile centres. "In the present condition of labor in Lowell," said the "Times," "the ship- ping of these Hebrew paupers here would mean that some hundreds of people already settled here and paying taxes would be out of em- ployment." Reports were spread that the Jews had brought much typhus fexer from Russia. In Fall River the labor unions made strenu- ous objections to their employment in the mills. In an elifort to coun- teract the prejudice that had been aroused in Lowell Agent Joseph S. Ludlam. of the Merrimack company, invited a newspaper man to visit the mills with him and see such Jews as were already at work. The reporter was evidently impressed. He wrote that "these women are dark with lovely eyes," and he readily accepted Mr. Ludlam's testi- mony that they were among the most industrious, thrifty and self- respecting operatives in the company's employ. Despite opposition, they continued to come, though never in such numbers as to rank with the French-Canadians or Greeks as candidates for citizenship. One effect of the incoming of these immigrants which was grati- fying to local pride was, of course, to maintaiit the city's numerical growth. Lowell in 1870 was a small city of 40,000 inhabitants ; in 1890 it had nearly 80,000 people, and was plainly destined soon to reach the 100,000 class. That racial diversification should be accompanied by new social cleavages was inevitable. These did not add to the democracy of the commiuiity, and they had one eftect whose value may be variously interpreted. These cleavages were so marked that they beyond pre- adventure hindered the growth of economic class consciousness, which, in an industrial city of fairly uniform population, will invariably, as a natural and proper phase of social evolution, arise. Solidarity of the workers was held back in Lowell by the fact that native Americans and Irish often hesitated to fraternize with French-Canadians, Greeks and Hebrews. This lack of cohesion might conventionally be inter- preted as advantageous to Lowell manufacturers. Yet throughout the eighties and nineties was witnessed the phenomenon of the rise of Fall Ri\-er and New Bedford to leadership in the textile industry, so that by 1893 Lowell, the ])ioneer large factory city of America, had became distinctly a secondary factor in the cotton industry. For Fall River's rapid rise, the advantage of tide-water transportation has been gener- all\- alleged. It is significant, nevertheless, as a possible supplementary factor, that owing to a larger percentage of English-born and English- speaking operatives, the labor union movement has been much more vigorous in "the Cit}' of the Dinner Pail" and ;it Xew Bedford than it 346 inSTORY OF LOWELL ever has been in Lowell ; and the query rises, if perhaps the kind of WLirkingf people who are capable of getting together and asserting themsehes are not in the long run a great asset to the community, the assurance of its further progress. Freedom from labor disturbances is not necessarily a sign of commercial health ; it may be a mark of jiartial stagnatioti. Be that as it mav, Lowell took no such leading place in the labor union movement of the j^ust-bcUiDii years as from its historic position in the manufacturing world might have been expected. The Mule Spinners' Lhiion of Fall River, which had been organized in 1858, con- tinued to be the model of its kind in the textile trades. In Lowell the increased prominence of ring spinning, which requires less of skilled help, mav have l.ieen a factcir in checking organization. Beginnings of Trade Unionism — Perhaps the most interesting ex- ample, indeed, of working-class self-assertion in Lowell in the time under review, came at its very beginning. In the autumn oi 1865 ^ decided effort was made by working men to influence the city's repre- sentation in the Legislature. The undertaking, as it turned out, was only partially successful, even though the nominations made by a workingmen's committee were taken over bodily by the Democratic party. The incident at least was not without economic significance and the resolutions which were adopted on October 25, 1865, at the first meeting of the Lowell workingmen's committee, should be a good document for some future historian of American labor relations. They are in direct evidence of a considerable growth of class consciousness, as thus expressed : Whereas, we heartil}' sympathize in the movement miw being agitated throughout the ciiuntrv in favor of a redtiction in the hours of labor, and we believe that the future stability of our prosperity of our republican institutions in America depend on the intelligence and edu- cation of the masses — we therefore, in behalf of the workingmen of Lowell, set forth and adopt the following resolutions : Resolved, That the institutions of civil liiierty given us by our fathers, and preserved from traitorous assaults by our gallant soldiers and sailors, can only be perpetuated by a thinking ballot box. Resolved, That the interests of our manufacturing industry and all (lur mechanic arts flourish or decline according as the laborers em- ployed in them are educated or ignorant, moral or vicious, and that the standard of education and morality among laboring people is higher or lower according as the o])portnnities afforded them ior intel- lectual and moral culture. Resolved, That to secure any impro\'ement in education and morality among the laboring classes it is indispensable that there be a reduction in the hours of lalior. Resolved, That we disapprove and discountenance "strikes" as tending to lead to difliculties between the employer and emplnyed and retard the interests of both. AFTER THE CIVIL WAR .^47 Resoh'ed, That havinnf lieen silent during the war. now brought to a glorious termination, when capitalists made their fortunes, though laborers still struggled for their subsistence, we now claim the aid of legislation to secure a reduction of the hours of labor, and of the Dress to advocate this reduction. Resolved. That the fleets and armies whose valor sa\ed the Uninn from dismemberment were recruited chieflv from among the working men : that justice demands that a liberal policv be pursued towards our returned soldiers and sailors, and that those who answered the first calls of their country should receive at least equal bounties with those who responded to summonses of a later day. Resolved. That in behalf of the working people of Lowell we will labor to secure the election of such candidates for public office, and such only, as we believe to be friendly to these measures, and com- petent to promote their successful adoption. This undertaking to create a distinctive labor party in local poli- tics catised more or less excitement which was reflected in the press. .\ largely attended meeting was held a few days later in Jackson Hall, tmder the auspices of an "Amalgamated Short Time Committee," which brou,ght forward as orator of the evening J- B. Howe, of Bos- ton. The ever broad-minded Dr. ]. C. Ayer also spoke briefly, urging "organization of workingmen for their own interest, as capital is organized for its own protection." The following nomination for the Legislature w^ere made : Senator, Charles F. Howe ; representatives. Foster ^^'ilson. Lorenzo D. Cogswell. L Henry Paige. Benjamin L. Butterworth. Charles Hunt. Foster Nowell. A characteristic proceeding followed. A Democratic partv cau- cus, seeing capital to be made out of this inovement. next dav adopted the foregoing list of candidates as its own. .Such action may or may not have been helpful to the laboring man's cause. In the ensuing election the Republicans as usual carried the city ; of the working- men's candidates only Foster Wilson was elected. Abotit 1883 there was a general strengthening of class conscious- ness in Massachusetts which was at least mildly reflected in Lowell. The time was that in which Henry George's "Progress and Poverty" was first attracting the attention of the more progressive American bourgeois, whose beau ideal of social reform it has been and is. Mak- ing much less of a stir but influencing a few thinking workers and "in- tellectuals" here and there, a certain A\'ilhelm Liebknecht. member of the German Reichstag, lectured in Boston in 1886, as in several other American cities. He was accompanied by Dr. and ]\Irs. Edw'ard Avel- ing, of London, the wife a daughter of Carl Marx. This visit effected the introduction of scientific socialism into the United States, occur- ring just prior to the greatest effulgence of romantic or Utopian social- ism, that promoted through the famous book "Looking Backward." In Lowell the Central Labor Union \vas formed in 1887. It was 34H HISTORY OF LOWELL com])ose(l of delegates from all the local unions. These were not so many, all told, considering the niimljer of ununionized employees in the city. Lowell was then — and still is — a hard town from the view- j)oint of social propaganda. An important point was gained, from the unionists' contention, when in 1890 the spinners' union was formed. Two years later the Central was found strongly supporting the 54 hour law for women and child workers, the final enactment of which was one of the achievements up to that time in safeguarding the health of those workers who are peculiarly helpless and liable to exploitation. The bill was passed May 19, 1892. It was a great victory for labor and yet not, as the sequel proved, in any way a real defeat foi the manu- facturers who managed to live under it and in many jilants to improve their product in directions rer|uiring enhanced skill and perscjnal inter- est on the operatives' part. A Generation of Normal Business Growth — Recovery of the busi- ness on which the life of Lowell depended, from the partial prostration which overtook them during the Rebellion, was virtually comi)lete before the jianic of 1X73 temporarily retarded their growth again. After that som,ewhat artificial depression (which was due in the main to excesses of speculation and the weaknesses of our unscientific monetary system) the industrial life of the city ran 1 m quite smoothly, with the usual ups and downs of commercial elation and depression, but with very few occurrences that were in any way startling or epoch making. How the city had suffered during the war was proved numerically by the Massachusetts census of 1865. On July 3 of that year citizens learned for the first time through an informal announcement made by Samuel A. McPhetres, appointed by the Legislature to take the Lowell census, that their population had dro])ped from 36,227 in 1S60, to 30,757 in the month of President Lincoln's assassination. No note of discouragement was heard, nevertheless. The whole citv went to work. Another bit of evidence of the depressed state of the cotton indus- try out of which Lowell had to emerge, may be noted from figures collated by Edward Atkinson at the beginning of 1864 for the preced- ing year. He found then that the number of idle spindles was 2,169,- 650. As the total numlx-r of spindles in the States surveyed was 4,288,113, it was evident that only about half the spindles were in operation in the last fidl year of the war. The rapidity, in especial, with which the cotton manufacture began to improve after the cessation of iKjStilities gave cause for abundant optimism in Lowell. In Jul}- and August, 1865, the news- papers were filled with such statements of the revival of business as the following, from the "Citizen ;" AFTER THE CI\"1L \\'AR 349 With the return of jieace and the greater demand for cloths and dry goods generally, a steady increase in jiroduction is noted. As is well known, the season of quiet has been well improved in refitting machinery in our mills, and to some extent in replacing old works with new, and the introduction of machinery for the production of new fabrics. In the Suft'olk mills, as also in the Lawrence, these changes are most marked, the former now turning out new and beautiful styles of woolen and mixed goods for both men's and women's wear. On the Lawrence Corporation the manufacture of hosier}', shirts and drawers is now so well systematized that 700 dozen shirtings are pro- duced dail}', while the number of shirts and drawers amounts to 35 dozen each day ; and what is more, the style and texture of the goods compares favorably with the best English fabrics of this description. It is certain that the coming fall and winter will witness a very large increase of the industrial output of our city. The importance, economic and social, of the mill agent was prob- ably at its height in the seventies and eighties As the older genera- tion of shareholders died off their heirs became more and more accustomed to leave all details of the manufacture to the treasurer, with offices in Boston ; and he in turn had so many financial duties and responsibilities that he leaned heavily upon his man at the mill for judgment concerning all details of operation. It was, fortunately for the mills and for the community, an era of able mill men wh<:), if less daring and spectacular than some of the leaders of the same industry in Southern ^Lassachusetts, at least were alwavs conservatively pro- gressive. Critics, like the late General Butler, often assailed the absentee ownership of the factories, but they were usually quick to admit that the resident agents did about as well as could be expected. Collectively the mill agents formed a group of men whose influence in public and institutional aft'airs was very powerful. In contradistinc- tion to some of the agents whom they succeeded they were nearly all men who had risen from the ranks. In 186S Alexander G. Cumnock, destined to leadership in Aineri- can textile education, became agetit of the Boott corporation. He was born at Glasgow, Scotland, in 1834, a son of Robert L. Cumnock, who in 1848 came to this country and settled on a farm at Mason, New Hampshire. Of eight sons of this Glaswegian, five became successful manufacturers. Alexander Cumnock came to Lowell at twelve years, and after education in the public schools and at a commercial college, entered the employment of the Hamilton Company. Thence he rose from position to position until upon the retirement of William A. Burke, in 1868, he was chosen agent of the Boott corporation. In 1874 the agency of the Merrimack Company, the oldest of the great corporations, was assigned to Captain Josejjh Smith Ludlam, born at Cape May, X. J., in 1837, a navigator who had seen much 350 HISTORY OF LOWELL service in China and the Orient generally and a life-long friend of General C G. (Chinese) Gordon. Under this leadership the company, with its affiliated print marks, lost nothing (jf its old-time reputation. Charles F. Battles, agent of tiie Tremont and Suffolk from 1858 on\vard, died in 1870. He was succeeded by Edward \V. Thomas. Homer Bartlett, first agent of the Massachusetts Cotton Mills, and later treasurer, resigned January 22, 1872, after thirty-two years' service with the corporation. He was born July 19. 17Q5. at Granby, and was graduated frmii Williams College in iSiS. He died in 1874. The resident agent down to i88(j was Frank Forbes Battles, born at Dorchester, in 1820, and educated in the Lowell public schools, where he was a classmate at the high school with General Butler and Cajjtain Gustavus W. I'^ox. He was paymaster of the Frescott Mills prior to their absorption by the Massachusetts in 1856, and thereafter was appointed agent of the combined corporations. Mr. Battles was suc- ceeded by William S. Southworth, born at Chicago in 1849, and named after an uncle who was agent of the Lawrence Manufacturing com- pan^■ in Lowell. i\lr. South\\(jrth came to Lowell as an office boy on the Lawrence in 1864. After \-arious services, including five years with the Draper Manufacturing Company at Hopedale, he returned to Lcjwell in 1882 to become superintendent of the ALassachusetts. After his a])pointment as agent in 1889 he was enabled to enter upon the great course of expansion at Lowell and in the South which has put the Massachusetts into the \-er}- forefront of New England manu- facturing enterprises. William Al\-ord lUirke, whose agency at the Boott Cotton ^lills was terminated in iSfi8, in order that he might accept the office of treasurer nf the Tremont and Suffolk, was another of the leading mill men of this era, and nne who kept his residence in Lowell. He was born at Windsor. \'eriuoiit, in 18S1. As a buy he displayed exceptional capacit\- fur learning languages, Init the family circumstances i)re- vented his going to college and at fifteen he was apprenticed to the machine shop of the Nashua Manufacturing Company. He learned the machine trades thoroughly, and at twenty-three he was at the head of the ( iay Machine Works in Nashua. Two years later he was called tn direct the re])air works of the Bo(]tt Company in Lowell. In 1845 he was made superintendent of the Lmvell Machine Shop, a posi- tion which he held until i8t)2, when he was made agent of the Boott. In iSjd he was elected treasurer of the Machine shoji, holding this responsible office until 1884. He died in 1887. In 1884 Oliver H. Moulton. born at Dover, New Hampshire, in 182c;, came tcj Lowell as agent of tlie Hamilton Conipau}-. He was h'kewise a director of the Kitson Machine Comjiany, the Shaw Stock- ing Coni,i)any and other manufacturing enterprises. ■STlULlXCr MILI-: Tltli.MUXT ANU .SLTFB^OLK iIll,I..S. .MASSAciirsi'rr'i's i -mi-ti ..\ .\iii,i,s ■'•V M ICKKIM Ai-K M.',.\TFArTri;l\i: CI ^\I1•AX^- .; .i: -«»« IlOliTT .MILLS, AFTER THE CI\'IL WAR 351 The destinies for tlie Appleton Company for many years were directed by Charles H. Richardson, born at Xorthfield, Massachusetts, in 1^43. anei one of the highly trained "graduates'' of the Lowell Machine Shop. Mr. Richardson rose through sheer ability to one of the large positions of the textile industry. Agent of the Lowell Manufacturing Company from 1852 to 1874, and thereafter its treasurer until his death in 1880, Samuel Fay was one of the most conspicuous figures in Lowell manufacturing in the post-bellum period. Born at Warwick, Massachusetts, in 1817, he came to Lowell at sixteen and after brief clerkships in se\eral down- town stores he became an office boy in the counting room of the Law- rence corporation. He rose rapidly and presently was recommended !)}• his eni.ployers for the ])osition of paymaster. He here enjoyed the confidence of the then agent, Alexander Wright, whom he succeeded after the latter's death. Mr. Fay was accounted one of the mathe- matical ex]jerts of the textile trade. "His ability," said a writer in a New York trade journal in 1880. "to estimate and compute the relative cost of raw material and manufactured goods was almost marvelous, and his associates were frequently astounded at the accuracy of his computations and predictions, his foresight being wonderfully great and correct." He was for a long time treasurer of the National Asso- ciation of Wool Manufacturers. Lowell Manufacturers at the Centennial Exposition — Under such leadership as the foregoing, New England textile manufacturers made a particularly good showing at the Philadelphia Centennial in 1876. The Lowell mills were represented with a display of sheetings, shirt- ings, drillings, calico flannels, jirinted calicoes, furniture coverings, bleached and dyed cambrics. The machine shops likewise sent exhibits. The figures of operation of the principal Lowell ct)rporalions in this year of the American centennial, just half a century after the incorporation of the town, as compiled liy \\'el)ber. may be cited: No. of Lbs. of Yards Name of Company. Spindles. Operatives. Cotton. Produced. Merrimack Manufactnring Co 15*^.-164 2.700 6,34-1,000 37.700.000 Hamilton Manufacturing Co .=;6,o8o 1,225 3,900,000 14,040,000 .\ppleton Manufacturing Co 42.458 600 4.092.OOO 12.480.OOO Tremont& Suffolk Manufacturing Co. g3.528 1.400 7,280,000 19,760,000 Lawrence .Manufacturing Co 92.000 1.700 q.tocooo 22.920,000 Boott Manufacturing Co 112,752 1.875 6.760.000 23.020.000 Massachusetts Manufacturing Co... 101.720 1.475 0,256.o' most New England textile men, has not been an unmixed blessing to the industry. Copeland sa}'s of it that "so far as the selling of spot cotton is concerned, its usefulness has steadily waned with the reestablishment of the simpler method of marketing." The metropolitan exchange, in brief, has not been a "traders' market," hut primarily a sjieculative, tir gambling, exchange. The Menace of Southern Competition — A considerable portion of the periijd of Lowell history now under consideration was one in which most New England manufacturers imagined themselves engaged in a bitter struggle for existence against Southern competi- tion. How this fantasy arose is easily seen. Mills of the South had a small but impressive exhiliit at the Philadelphia Centennial in 1876. In the years immediately following, factories began to be built in the Piedmont belt from Virginia to Alabama. These new manufactories had their tiwn propagandists, who made the most of the argument from location. It soon became a fashion in many quarters to predict that the BAY .STATK COTTON CORPORATION. SILF:SrA JIILLK OF UNITED STATES WORSTED ClWrPANY, AFTER THE CIVIL WAR 353 multiplication of mills close to the cotton fields spelled the ruin of such cities as Lowell. These jeremiads overlooked, of course, certain very patent factors favoring continued prosperity of the cotton industry in New England. They ignored the truth that with millions of unclad and half clad peo- ple in the world there was room, for all the factories of both sections. The value of experience passed on from generation to generation of textile workers was not always properly appreciated. Neither was it foreseen that many Northern mills, as notably those of New Bedford, would become more profitable than ever before through turning their attention to the making of fine and high-jjriced goods, in which the element of the worker's skill is far more significant than the cnst of the basic raw material. Pessimism, likewise, failed to take into account the larger reservoirs of quick capital which are available in thrifty New England, for the manufacturer who can command ready cash in buying his cotton is always at an advantage over the other manufac- turer whose bank account and credit are more limited. These and other factors, which are now generally understood, operated to keep Lowell's spindleage gaining even at a time when many people were anxiously expecting that the city's basic industry would soon begin to decline. Intensive Improvement of Lowell's Water Power — While water power, with the example of Fall River and its coal-powered mills be- fore them, was undoubtedly not so highly esteemed among mill men in the second half of the nineteenth century as it had been regarded in the earlier decades, no effort was lost at Lowell to utilize to the fullest extent possible the gift of the Merrimack. During 1875 and 1876 much of the Pawtucket dam from "Great Rock" to the Pawtucketville shore was reconstructed under direction of Cleveland J. Cheney, who in 1863 had succeeded Paul Hill as super- intendent uf the Locks and Canals Company. During this period some 400 men worked in the river bed whenever conditions permitted. In 1889, again under Mr. Cheney's supervision, an extension of the Boott Company's penstock was accomplished, and at the same time work was begun of removing obstacles in the river at Hunt's Falls, with the object of lowering the water in the basin between Central and Aiken street bridges and thus increasing the head of water in the turbines all along the river front. New Industries for a Growing City — While the established manu- facturing corporations were either holding their own or making gradual advancement, Lowell was continually gaining new industries, usually, up to 1893, in some way connected with the textile trades. The advent of at least a few of the most considerable of these should be noted in this narrative L-23 354 HISTORY Ol- [J)\VI':LL Ivichanl Kitson, founder of the machine sh(j]i that lont;' lias l)orne his name, and whose principal development was from about i860 onward, was born at Cleckheaton, Yorkshire, England, in 1814, a son of John Kitson, a card clothing manufacturer. He was trained in his father's shop. In 184';, when a valualjle patent was about to expire and when the firm was in difficulty on account of the dishonesty of an employee, the }ounger Kitson received a proposal from Francis Calvert that he migrate to Lowell. He did so and in a small shop on Broadway Liegan to make the first needle-pointed card clothing in America. Being a Ixirn in\entor, Mr. Kitson [jresently turned his attention to the construction of pickers, on which he received many patents. In 1852 he devised a single card-opening machine which became popular throughout the textile industry. He introduced the needle-pointed cylinder to take the jdace of the beater in certain lap- pers. The "trunk system'' of opening and cleaning cotton fibre owes its inventiiin to him. These machines of Mr. Kitson's contriving were at first made by contract in other shops, as he lacked the capital to establish such a machine shop of his own as he desired to have. In i860, however, he succeeded in obtaining the means to buy land on which an old school house stood to the rear of the i)resent Kitson Machine Shop. This was the beginning of one of Lowell's most pros- perous manufacturing concerns. The business was incorjiorated in 1874 under the title of The Kitson Machine Company, iif which Mr. Kitson was elected president, serving initil his death, July 14, 1885. Its expansion since iQio has been one nf the notalile features of the Lowell industrial situation. Comb i^ins began to be made at the shop of Walter H. Bagshaw about 1871. This manufacturer was born at Derb^-shire, England, in 1847. being the son of a pin manufacturer. In 1S67 he came to the United States to take a place in a sewing machine company. In 1871 he established himself at Lowell as a comb pin manufacturer, with one boy as an assistant. His business increased rapidly and within a short time he was eni|iloying alxiut 25 men in making this specialty. riu- largest American Inisiness of making reed^ and harnesses was established in Lowell 1)y Robert Carruthers, born at Blackburn, Lancashire, in 1846, of a famil}- whose male memliers for more than a century had specialized in this manufacture. Mr. Carruthers came to this counti-y in 1872. After employment with the Providence Reed and Harness Company, he went into btisiness for himself, at first, in Law- rence, and then, while looking for larger quarters, decided to inove to Lowell. His establishment in Dutton street soon liecame the largest of its kind in North America. Wilson W. Carey, borti at Lcmpster. New Hamjishire, in 1831, and trained as a wood-worker, brought the manufacture of wood- AFTER THE CIA'II- \\AR 355 working machinery, hangers, shafting and pulleys to Lowell, begin- ning in 1867. In the following year he took a partner, George W. Harris. This hrm continued in business for twelve years and then Wr. Carey became the sole owner. .\ machine shop for manufacture of steam and gas fitting special- ties was founded at first in Howe street and later in Middle street by- Horace R. Barker, who in a relatively short life became one of the city's foremost citizens. Mr. Barker was born in 1829 at Lexington, Massachusetts, the son of a skilled maker of cutlery. He served an apprenticeship with the New England Gas Pipe Company of Boston. In 185 1 he started his business in Lowell. He died of enlargement of the heart in 1886. Specialties in the way of patent warping, baling and beaming machines, expansion combs and traverse card grinders, which are now made in large quantities in Lowell, for sale to textile manufacturers all over the world, are due to the inventive talent of Thomas C. Ent- whistle, who started his shop in the city in 1887. Mr. Entwhistle was born at Belmont, Lancashire, England, in 1846, a scion of a family of mill managers. He learned his trade in his native country and came to America in 1869. He helped set up at Manchester, New Hamp- shire, one of the first slashers ever used in that State. He patented a new type of warping machine. For five years he was with the Drapers at Hopedale. In 1880 he came to Lowell and organized the Phoenix Machine Company, of which he was agent. Presently he left to take a more important position at Hartford, Connecticut, and then in 1887 he returned with sufficient capital to start a machine shop on his own accovmt. In 1871 the Pevey brothers, John M., George E., Franklin S. and James A., sons of Abiel Pevey, for twenty-five years foreman of the Lowell Machine Shop, opened their extensive foundry on Walker street, which was enlarged in 1882 and again in 1887. This became one of the largest firms of its kind in the United States, its castings going to every part of the continent, in addition to supplying regular and rush work for the leading manufacturers of Lowell. Copper washers were made for the first time in the United States at the Button street shop of David H. Wilson, born at Paisley, Scot- land, in 1839, and educated in Lowell public schools, in the carpet designing department of the Lowell Manufacturing Company, and under David A. Dana, coppersmith. In 1874. with his brother, John C. Wilson, he inaugurated a metal working establishment with distinc- tive specialties. From about 1890 active eiTorts of the Board of Trade, of which John Smith was secretary, to bring new businesses to Lowell were crowned with manv successes. One of the most conspicuous of the ,556 HISTORY OF LOWELL companies thus induced to settle in the Spindle City was the Massa- chusetts Mohair Plush Company, one of the American pioneers in weaving the long silky hair of the Angora goat, for generations a spe- cialty of the English city of Bradford. Lowell's prominence in the knit goods industry was assured in May, 1869. when the Lowell Hosiery Company was incorporated with a capital stock limited to 8200,000. The company started with a capital of $100,000, which was subsequently raised to $175,000. The charter was granted to William F. Salmon, Thomas Nesmith, Hocum Hos- ford and their associates and successors. .\nuther of the remarkable industrial developments of this period in Lowell grew out of the invention of machinery for making seamless hose. Residents of the Pawtucket street neighborhood about 1877 became aware of a newcomer in Arlington street, a man of strong fea- tures, picturesque l.ilack curly hair and heavy mustache, who was reputed to be a clever in\entor. This was Benjamin Franklin Shaw, who, as textile people knew, had for the past ten years been working on apparatus for making seamless stockings. To the educational world Mr. Shaw was already well known, for in the years 1860-64, while in the employ of a Philadelphia publishing house, he had com- piled two famous geographies, based on objective and associative methods which were then only beginning to be understood. When Mr. Shaw came to Lowell from Cambridge in 1877, his tex- tile project was virtuallv ready for fulfillment on a large scale. It immediately gained the attention of local capitalists and the Shaw Stocking Company was formed. In 1880 Mr. Shaw took his loom to England, where it was e.xhibited to manufacturers from every Euro- pean country and, under most picturesque circumstances, to the Lord High Chancellor at Westminster palace. The apparatus was speedily recognized to make svich an advance in the art of knitting as to make its in\'entor tlie compeer of Lee. who invented the first stocking frame. ]\lr. Shaw was managing head of the stocking compan)- that bore his name down to his death in 1890. Apart fronx his standing in the manufacturing world, he gained celebrity throughout New England through his [jurchase and development of Ossipee Park, on the eastern slope of the New Ham])shire mountain of that name, whose falls and scenic outlooks were carefully preserved from vandalism. The Multiplication of Patent Medicines — The fame of Lowell as a patent medicine centre grew apace. The Hood manufacture of patent medicines, which through in- genious advertising ri\alcd the Aver company in international pub- licity, was founded by C. I. Hood, born at Chelsea. Vermont, in De- cember. 1845, the son of an apothecary from whom he first learned the elements of the drug Inisiness. Mr. Hood came to Lowell as a youth AFTER THE CIVIL WAR 357 and served a five years' apprenticeship in the shop of Samuel Kidder, at Merrimack and John streets. For two years he was prescription clerk in the establishment of Theodore Metcalf, Boston, which has had a remarkable reputation for the successes of its "graduates." In I1S70 Mr. Hood bought an interest in the store, later EUingwoods', in the old Barristers' Hall building, at the corner of Merrimack and Central streets. Here Hood's sarsaparilla was conceived. It had local success from the outset. In 1878 the business had grown to such an extent that rooms for the manufacture were engaged in Southwick block, Prescott street. A year later the Crosby building, Church street, was rented. In 1882 the company contracted for the present large lalioratory near the railroad station, four stories high, with floor one hundred by fifty feet and with a bottling capacity of 10,000 bottles a day. Municipal Affairs After the Civil War — The administration of municijja! afl'airs in Lowell from 1865 to 1893 continued to be on a general high plane of honesty and efficiency, though it is not to be denied that occasional occurrences pointed to such a situation as led in the present century to adoption of the commission form of govern- ment. Only good men of either of the political parties could be elected to the mayoralty ; the council sometimes contained members of rather small calibre. No loyal citizen of Lowell, certainly, need to be ashamed of the mayors who held office from the Civil War onward. Josiah Greenough Peabody, who was mayor of Lowell at the close of the Civil War. has already been mentioned. He took a life- long interest in political and municipal affairs. As a young man he was a Democrat, but the repeal of the Missouri Compromise Act threw his allegiance over into the Republican party, with which he remained during the rest of his life. In 1837 he served a term in the Legislature. In the years 1850, 1859 and i86o he was in the common council. In 1865 and 1866 he was mayor and again in 1872. In all the years he served the city he missed but one meeting of any kind at which he was supposed to be present. He had among other interests the affairs of the Merrimack River Savings Bank, of which he was president for twent_\-four years and of Dean Academy, Franklin, of which he was a trustee; of the First L^niversalist Church in Hurd street, of which he was long the oldest member. No finer example of intelligent and high-minded citizenship occurs in the history of Lowell. George F. Richardson, who was mayor in 1867 and 1868, was one of the three lawyer sons of a Tyngsboro attorney, all of whom attained distinction in their profession. He was born in 1829, and educated at Philli])s Academy, Exeter; Harvard College, from which he was grad- uated in 1850. and the Harvard Law School. In 1862-63 he served in 35S HISTORY OF LOWELL the ciimmon council. After his nia\iiralty, in 1871 and 1.S7J. he was State Senator from Lowell. His other public services were many. For a number of years he was president of the Middlesex Mechanics' Association and a trustee of the Public Library, in whose work he took great interest. He was president of the Lowell Manufacturing Company and a director of the Prescott mills. Jonathan P. Folsom was mayor in 1S69 and 1870. He was born at Tamworth, New Hampshire, October 9, 1820. He came to Lowell in 1840 to take clerical work with Dinsmore and Reed. Like several other Lowell men of the middle decades he tried the South for a time, settling at Benson, Alabama, but after six years he returned to the Spindle City. He built up a dry goods business on Merrimack street and soon was accounted among Lowell's successful men. Lie served in the common council of 1856 and 1867: as alderman in 1859,1861, 1862 and 1878. After his mayoral years he had two terms in the Legislature. He was a director of the Old Lowell National Bank and a trustee of the Central Savings Bank. Edward Fay Sherman, mayor in 1871, was a brilliant graduate of the Lowell High School and of the 1844 class of Dartmouth College. A descendant of Rev. John Sherman, second minister of Watertown, he was a son of Captain Edward Sherman, who came to Lowell from Wayland in 1824. The younger Sherman had a brief experience as a schoolmaster. He was admitted to the bar and later became secretary and treasurer of the Traders' and Mechanics' Insurance Company, of Lowell. He was in the Massachusetts houses of representatives of 1862 and 1867. He died in Lowell, February 10, 1872, on his fifty-first birthday. In the years 1873, 1874 and 1875. Francis Jcwett was mayor. This verv able business man had a career which is of national as w-ell as local interest for he was one of the founders of the dressed beef busi- ness, as it is carried on to-da}-, the firm which he founded being one of the components of the "beef trust." Mr. Jewett was born at Nelson, New Hampshire, September 19, 1820. After preliminary schooling in the district school of Nelson, he entered the Baptist Seminary at Han- cock, a nearby town, where he continued his education until he was twenty-one. He acquired his father's farm, but trading in cattle inter- ested him more. In 1848 he came to Lowell and took work at the slaughter house of Clement Upham, in Chelmsford. He learned what he could about the meat business and in 185 1 he started a concern of his own. In 1877 the firm became Jewett & Swift, the first dealers in dressed beef in Lowell and the prototype of the present Swift organiza- tion of Chicago and Boston. Mr. Jewett was not only a remarkable man of business, but a ])oi)ular mimicipal officer. He had two years in the common council, 1864 and 1865, and two in the board of aldermen. AFTER 'I'HE CI\'IL WAR 359 i868 and 1869. When he first ran for mayor he had as opponent for- mer Mayor Hosford, who was the citizens' candidate. Mr. Jewett was the only one on the regular Republican ticket to be elected. In 1875 he was nominated by both Republican and Citizens' parties and had a practically unanimous election. In 1877 and 1879 he was Senator from the Lowell district. He was a director of the Wamesit National Bank ; senior vice-president of the Merrimack River Savings Bank; director of the Erie Telephone and Telegraph Company ; president of the Mid- dlesex Odd Fellows' Building Association ; president of the proprietors of the Odd Fellows' Building; director in the Swift Refrigerator Com- pany; director of the Ayer Home for Young Women and Children. He died Ajiril 22, 1896. Charles A. Stott. mayor in 1876 and 1877, was a son of the woolen manufacturer, Charles Stott, formerly of Rochdale, England, whose story has already been told in this hist(jry. The younger Stott was born in Dracut, August 18, 1835. He re- ceived his education in the public schools of Lowell, of whose high school he was a graduate. After brief service in a hardware store and in the counting room of the .Merrimack company, he went into the em- jiloy of his father's company, the Belvidere ^^'oolen Mills in 1856. Down to the senior Stott's death, in 1882, he was clerk and paymaster of this company. Thereafter he became agent and treasurer. Before the Civil War, Mr. Stott was captain of Company H, Sixth Regiment, Massachusetts \'olunteer Militia. Upon the regiment's enlistment he went in as major and had nine months' service under Colonel A. S. Follansljee. In politics Major Stott was a Republican, who served the city in the common councils of 1859 and i860 and the hoard of alder- men in 1869 and 1870. He was chairman of the Republican State committee in 1881 and 1882 and ])residential elector in 1884. John A. G. Richardscjn, the tirst Democratic mayor of the city in twenty-eight years, was elected in 1878 and reelected the year follow- ing. He was born in Lowell. October 13, 1840. W'ith a brother, he conducted a successful pruvisicm business. Personally a very ]5opular man, he was elected to Legislature in 1874 as a Democrat from the Republican stronghold of ^\ ard Four. He was a member of Company C, Sixth Regiment, during the Ci\il War. In 18S2 a desire to operate in a larger business field led to his going to Minneapolis, where the rest of his life was spent. The mavoralty contest of 1880 brought tn the front one of the ablest and most eloquent of the younger men of his time, Frederic T. Greenhalge. The pride with which a former teacher of this statesman and orator described his youthful attainments to her class of ten-year- old I)oys and girls is well recalled bv the present historian. Mr. Greenhalge was born at Clitheroe, England, July 19, 1842. The family 36o HISTORY OF LOWELL came to America durint,' his hoyhood. His early education was re- ceived in the Lowell school. He entered Harvard College in 1859, but on account of military service did not finish his course. He was ad- mitted to the bar in 1S65. He was in the common council in 1868 and 1869. From 1871 through 1873 he was a valued member of the school board. His distinguished career, after the years of his mayoralty, will appear in the later narrative. George Rimcls, mayor in 1882, was born at Warner, New Hamp- shire, February 3, 1823. After ordinary schooling in district schools and New London Academy, he moved to Lowell and learned the stone cutter's trade. Of a naturally adventurous disposition he did not really settle down in Lowell until several years later. One of his ex- periences was to embark on a three years' whaling voyage from Salem. About eighteen months out, the ship was wrecked on one of the Fiji Islands The crew were three days in open boats and then picked up bv a vessel which landed them nn the coast of New Zealand. Mr. Runels remained in the British cobmy for three months, during which time he helped to build the first large wharf in the islands. Afterwards he shipped on a trading vessel and for more than a year saw something of most of the Fast Asiatic ports. In 1845 he returned to Lowell and resumed stone cutting, but the lure of California caught him and in 1849 he went West. Five years later he was back again to engage in business once again. He retired with a competence in 1878. He served in the common cciuncil of 1862 and in the board of aldermen in 1S64 and 1873. Many creditable achievements stand to the credit of John J. Dono- van, mavor in 1882 and 1883. This very able man of affairs was born at Vonkers, New York, July 2S, 1843. His widowed mother brought him t(i Lowell in 1846. He had a good education in the Washington grammar and Lowell high schools. On leaving school he entered the em])loyment of David Gove, at 223 Central street. At twenty-one he was admitted to partnership. In 1877 Mr. Donovan became interested in pai)er-making in Dracut and seven )ears later he organized the .At- lantic Telegraph Company, of which he was treasurer. In 1882 he was serving on the lioard of overseers of the poor when he was elected mayor on the Democratic ticket. The electorate approved his adminis- tration bv giving him a second term, llis mayoralty was a time of large achie\'ements. The .\iken street and Central bridges were then practically completed. New buildings were erected at the City Farm. The Pawtucket grammar school and the Powell street school repre- sented important additions to the city's educational plant. Largely thrnugh the mayor's initiative the annual dues for service from the Public Library were remitted and free reading rooms were ojiened. .After his vears of office ]\lr. Donovan became Democratic candidate AFTER THE CI\TL WAR 301 for Congress from the eighth Massachusetts district and was nearly elected. He was a felicitous public speaker and a man who made a remarkably favorable impression on public occasions. Edward J. Noyes, mayor in 1885, was born at Georgetown, Sep- tember 7, i(S4i. He was educated in the schools of his native town and in Lowell. At age cif nineteen he took part in the recruiting of soldiers for General Butler's Gulf of Mexico expedition. He was with the general at Ship Island and at New Orleans. He saw much active service in Louisiana and Texas, receiving a wound in the shoulder in I\Iay, 1863. which incapacitated him for some time. He had by this time risen to the rank of major. He returned to Lowell in 1S64. In 1868 he studied law at Columbia University, New York. In 1S81 he was elected chief of police of Lowell. His election to the mayoralty in T885 was by a vote of 5,012 against 4,477 for his opponent, George \\'. Fifield. During his year the municipal debt was reduced by about $200,000. In 1888 Mr. Noyes was again chief of police. The local Democratic party in 1886 elected and the following \ear reelected to the mayoralty James C. Abbott, born at Andover, June 3, 1823, a graduate of Phillips Academy, Andover, for two years a student at Dartmouth College and a student at the Harvard Law School. Mr. x\bbott practiced his profession in Lowell for more than fifty years, with honor and reasonable emolument. He was for many years president of the First National Bank and president of the Lowell Mutual Fire Insurance Company. He was elected to the board of aldermen in 1880. He gave six years to the service of the school board. The Republican party came back in the city election of 1888. the beginning of Charles Dana Palmer's three years' mayoralty. Mr. Pal- mer, a son of George \\". Palmer, book publisher, was born at Cam- bridge, November 25, 1845. -^^^ ^ member of the 1864 class at the Bos- ton Latin School, he received one of the four Franklin medals. He entered Harvard College and was graduated in 1868. Going into the service of the Washington Mills Company, Lawrence, he showed such ability that in 1869 he was chosen by the United States commissioners of Paris Exposition to gather statistics concerning the wool industry of Canada. In 1872 he engaged in the manufacture of woolen shoddy at North Chelmsford, whence his long connection with Lowell affairs. In 1880 he married Rowena, youngest daughter of Fisher A. Hildreth, who had died in T873, leaving a large estate. After his marriage much of Mr. Palmer's time was given to managing the Hildreth properties. George \V. Fifield, a Democrat, was elected mayor in 1891 and reelected in 1892. He was born at Belmont, New Hampshire, in 1848 and was educated at Gilmantnn Academy. He learned the machinist's trade, and, being a man of vigorous personality and very considerable inventiveness, he soon rose out of the employee class. The Fifield 362 - HISTORY OF LOWELL Tool Company, which he organized, became one of the principal manufacturing companies of its kind in the United States. Mr. Fifield was also president of the Appleton National Bank, of the Lowell Elec- tric Light Corporation and director in many other business enterprises. Lowell's Representatives in Congress — The Congressional repre- sentation of Lowell was regarded b}- local business men and working men as a matter of especially vital concern in the 3-ears in which the country was recovering from the elTects of the Civil War. JMost rep- resentatives of the manufacturing interests were strongly committed to a high tariff. From the end of Congressman Train's second and last term in 1863 down to 1870 the district was represented by Hon. George S. Boutwell, of Groton, afterwards Governor of the State. In the lat- ter year George jM. Brooks, later judge of probate for Middlesex county, was chosen, to be followed two years later by Constantine Esty. In 1874 John K. Tarbox was elected; in 1876, General Butler; from 1878 through 1882, William A. Russell ; in 1884, Charles H. Allen, of Lowell, being reelected in 1886; in 1888, Frederic T. Greenhalge, also of Lowell; 1890, Moses T. Stevens, reelected in 1892; 1894-1902, William S Knox, of Lawrence; 1902-12, Butler Ames, of Lowell; 1912. John Jacob Rogers, of Lowell, the incumbent at this writing. During the years 1866-76, General Benjamin F. Butler was con- tinuously in Congress, but not from the North Middlesex District. The Lowell statesman had acquired a summer residence on Cape Ann and was regularly elected as a Republican of independent proclivities from the Essex District. It was during this service that he espoused the cause of fiat mone}' with all the intensity of his temperament. General Butler's Governorship — General Benjamin F. Butler, of Lowell, was elected Governor of Massachusetts in 1883 as a Democrat ujH.in a platform which promised, among other measures, to undertake a thorough investigation of the State institutions. The electorate knew in advance that the gubernatorial thrust w(juI(1 Ije directed espe- cially against the Tewksbury almshouse concerning the management of which serious charges had been made at intervals for some years past. The proximity of this institution to Lowell naturally led Gen- eral Butler's fellow-citizens to be keenly interested to see what prog- ress he would make with his jilan of a general housccleaning at Tewks- bury. The narrative of this investigation, which stirred the whole Com- monwealth during the spring and summer of 1883, and which ended somewhat inconclusively despite the apparent evidences of abuses of management which the Governor's committee amassed, and which the Governor himself presented to the public in the character of a prosecu- tor, belongs rather to the history of Massachusetts than of Lowell. It should at least l)e noted that one of the strong points which General AFTER THE Cl\ IL WAR 363 Butler was able to make against the conduct of the State almshouse was the superior record of the Lowell city almshouse, then under direc- tion of Colonel Albert Pinder, situated only eight miles from the other institution and operated without any such ghastly statistics of mor- tality as had aroused a certain section of the public. One of the most serious charges, indeed, which the investigating committee made against the Tewksbury almshouse was based on figures showing that of babies born at the institution or transported there during infancy practically none survived, the mortality among them exceeding ninety per cent. ! The defence, as commonly urged at that period, was that these children were born with inherited weaknesses such that nature in any circumstances would mercifully release most of them from suffering. Upon this argument, which we now know to be in the main baseless (since characteristics acquired in the lifetime of parents are not inherited). General Butler countered by showing that under the city of Lowell's treatment unfortunate babies did not die. In his "Argument before the Tewksbur}- Investigation Committee" this is a significant passage : Albert Pinder, superintendent uf the Lowell almshouse, testified in answer to questions from Governor Butler: "In the iiurser}- I have an average of from forty to forty-five." Q. "How old does the nursery include?" A. "All the way from a birth to nine or ten years old." Q. "How many children have you in the reform school?" A. "I think I have twenty-six sentenced children, besides about as many more pauper children." Q. "Twentv-six convicts — that is, sentenced there by the courts, sentenced there hv the Police Court?" A. "Yes, .sir." Q. "And about the -iame number of what?" A. "About the same number of pauper children : they all attend the same school." Q. "How many children under the age of nine, in the nursery, did you lose last year?" A. "I don't think I lost a child last year, if my memory serves me right ; I have lost one or two this }-ear." This good showing of the Lowell almshouse furnished the guber- natorial investigator with excellent argumentative material, for in the vear preceding the investigation seventy-one out of seventy-two chil- dren at the State almshouse had died — this, too, in face of the fact that Colonel Pinder was allowed only $1.07 for food per child, while the similar item of cost at Tewksbury was $2.09. The literature of this now historic controversy about the conduct of the State almshouse from its foundation under a law of 1852 down to the vear of General Butler's governorship, is well represented in the collections of the Boston Public Library. From, a cursory survey 364 HISTORY OF LOWELL of it uiie would not want to pass judgment on the question (which supplied the governor's primary animus ) whether or not officers of the Harvard Medical School misused their privilege of receiving a supply of cadavera from this source. It would at all events appear to be well established that the chief executive, with his almost pre- ternatural aliility to discover damaging circumstances, did succeed in uncovering about as disgraceful management as has ever gone un- checkefl for a period of years in any Massachusetts institution. It was at the time gratifying to local pride that the Lowell almshouse could be used to refute the argument that careful and kindly treatment are of little avail in preventing infant mortality among the children of unfortunate parentage. Activities of City Departments — The departmental work of the cit}- government gradually grew in scope as Lowell attained more and more of the proportions of a large city. Defects in the plan of appointment of police officers became very apparent in the years just succeeding the Civil War. From the time of incorporation there had been inherited a system under which appoint- ments were made after each election. The policeman's position was thus a part of the spoils system, dependent on political pull rather than personal fitness for the work. This situation was not peculiar to Lowell. To remedy it the Massachusetts legislature passed the Civil Service Law of 1884, Chapter 320. Two years later the title of City Marshal was dropped and that of Chief of Police was substituted. The police department thus constituted has been singularly free from charges of corrujition or incompetence. .■\ serious epidemic oi small-pox alarmed the city in February. 1 87 1. The disease got the upper hand and was epidemic all summer. Nearlv si.x hundred persons were attacked by it and 178 of these died. There was much criticism of the health authorities for letting the disease get started, and out of this criticism grew a new efficiency in the handling of problems of the i)ublic health. Streets and l)ridges were extended as the cit}- continued to expand. An iron liridge at Pawtucket Falls w-as completed on November 25, 1871. Tliis structure took the place of the former toll bridge, whose story has been told at some length in this history. In this year also was finished and dedicated the iron bridge at Tyngsborough, the costs of which were assessed bv the county commissioners according to the following percentages: The cnunty, 38; Tyngsborough, 40: L(:)well, 16; Dunstable, 3: Chelmsford, 3. The Aiken street bridge, popularly termed "the red elephant," was completed in .\])ril, 1883, at an ex- pense of $195,000. The opposition that was aroused by the proposal to span the river at this point is well remembered ; it was some years before the traffic over the liridge in any way justified its erection; and AFTER THE CIVIE WAR 365 even now it carries a much smaller traffic than that of the hridg^e be- low it. A fire of August 4, 1SS2, destroyed the old Central bridge. In its place was built an iron structure, at a cost of $113,441, which was opened to traffic in September, 1883. Problems of a proper water supply for a growing city agitated both the water board and the general public of Lowell for many years. A nearly ideal solution was finally found in the driven well system. The Merrimack river in primitive conditions l)rought singularly clear and ])ure water from the New Hampshire mountains to the sandy intervale lands such as flank the stream from Concord downward. The growth, however, of manufacturing cities and villages on the main stream and on many of its influents during the nineteenth cen- tury caused steadv deterioration of the quality of the river water. A generation ago the dictum to the eft'ect that running water purifies itself was often repeated in justification of continued use of a supply from the river. This notion was held true down to a comparatively recent date : it was quite effectually disproved by studies of the con- tent of nitrites and nitrates in the water of the Potomac river from Harper's Ferry to Washington about 1906. In 1869 agitation of the city water problem arose. One engineer's estimate of the cost of serving the city with filtered water was $740, 000. James B. Francis, of the Locks and Canals Company, presently brought out a pamphlet in which the probable cost was set at $2,000,- 000. A referendum on the subject of a new system was held on Feb- ruary 2T,, 1869. It resulted: Yeas, 1,866; nays, 1,418. This was a victory for the joint special committee on a supply of water for the city of Lowell. Their report had shown conclusively the inadvisability of attempting to draw a water supply from the Concord river or from Beaver brook. No ponds in the vicinity were found to have sufficient drainage area to guarantee a water supply for a city of rising forty thousand people with an average daily consumption of sixty gallons per inhabitant. The Merrimack was indicated as the offering the one feasible source of supply. The need, meantime, of a more adequate system of obtaining pure water was shown by the continued use of wells in the most crowded parts of the city. Some of the wells, on the outskirts, were presum- ably fairly innocuous. One at the corner of Dummer and Lowell streets was imderstood to be a menace, even in days when the danger of polluted water was less universally realized than now. "This well," wrote the investigating committee, "is evidently supplied mainly from the washing of the streets and the drainage of sewers and vaults, fil- tered through a few feet of earth. The result is a comjiound which 366 HISTORY OF LOWELL may fairl}- he characterized as poisonous. It is understood that the water, when accessible, is used by at least too families." .A decision to introduce a system of filtered water having been reached, a i)oard of water commissioners was appointed in January, 1870, to hold office for three years, unless the proposed water works should l)e finished sooner. Under this board was constructed one of the most elaborate systems of "natural filtration" _\et undertaken any- where. The basis of the system was a filtering gallery, whose intake was on the Pawtucketville side of the river about quarter nf a mile aliove the falls. The water was admitted to the gallery from the river through a metal pipe. The length nf the gallery was 1,300 feet. It connected with a conduit whose total length from the inlet chamber to the terminal chamber was 14.1S2 feet. Lender Beaver Brook, which was crossed near the Dracut navy yard, the water was carried by an in\erted syphon. Thence the conduit ran to the newlv established ])umping station in West Sixth street, Centralville. The pumping station that was ci instructed by the water commis- sioners has long been one the show places of Lowell. Its operations are spectacular enough to interest the general public : thev were for a long time enough of a novelty to bring engineers to visit the works. The Morris engine, indeed, which was installed as part of the original pumjiing arrangements, was soon imicpie. It happened that in 1872, when the conmiissioners were considering pumping apparatus, Henry J. Morris, of Philadel])hia, built for the Spring Garden Works of that city an engine which was considered remarkable on account of its large results from a small expenditure of coal. It specifically was guaranteed to raise seventy-five million poimds of water one foot on one hundred ]30uno schools where the customary fumbling and stumbling was tolerated. "Bunny." as Mr. Sherburne was affectionately called, was a teacher with marked capacity for ha\ing "something d(_iing every minute" in his classes. The droning sleepiness of the average classical lecture room was c[uite absent from his bailliwick, and the alertness of his recitations undoubtedl}' had an eft'ect in "speeding up" the manner of teaching of yuunger people when they were elected to classrooms at the schoeil. The mathematical and luiglish teaching of Miss Mar\- A. Webster was not less effecti\-e in making the Lowell High School one of the best preparatory schools in the country. During a long service Miss Webster earned the gratitude of every earnest boy and girl who came into one of her classes by her patient insistence on clearness and sim- plicity of demonstration. Her own grasp on the subjects she taught was impeccable, and she was almost preternaturally quick to discover whether a pupil really understood or was only trying to "Iduff through." About 1S85 there came to the high school a young man who looked so young that he was frequently mistaken for one of the stu- dents. This was the late principal, Cyrus Irish, just graduated from Harvard, where he had specialized in scientific subjects. He was, like Mr. Coburn, an enthusiastic advocate of the laboratory inethod of torching and he made chemistry fascinating to every youth who took it up. So one might go on enumerating the whole list of really remark- able teachers of the decade in which the Lowell school first lived closely up to the ideal that President Eliot had set for the secondary schools of the country. Out of the discordant situation which Mr. Chase experienced in the first years of his principalship, when the female half nf the schnol was under a separate jurisdiction, he suc- ceeded before his retirement in creating a fine unified loyal corps of teachers and a quite wonderful school spirit. This condition was handed on to his successor. The spirit is by no means extinct. An element that affected most of the community very favorably was introduced in t88t when military drill was made compulsory for high school boys. The hall in the historic market building in Market street was long used as a drill hall. The exhibitions and field days of the battalion did much to advertise the institutions. The efficiency of the drill as imparted by Captain Hanscom was such as to place the Lowell high well up among the leading military schools of the State. The instruction undoubtedly gave many boys a decided "slant" toward a military or naval career. In 1889 courses of "calisthenics" or physi- cal culture for girls were introduced. The graimnar schools in this period were likewise undergoing 1^24 370 HISTORY OF LOWELL cuntiuual im])r(.ivement. L'ndcr [jruf^ressive school liuards the curricu- lum was enriched, as it should lie in any well ordered system of in- struction for children, who are incapable of intensive application upon a few subjects and whose energy is best spread over many subjects. well taught. The music instruction under George F. W'illey, who served as special teacher, and who appeared once a week with accordeon and pitch pipe, was of a very good grade. A step was taken toward recognition of the claims of the manual arts when draw- ing was introduced about 1875. The first instruction, based on South Kensington models, was rather hard and mechanical, but not alto- gether unadapted 10 the conditions of a textile city. The annual ex- hibitions in Huntington Hall brought forth much work of decided merit. In the "three R's" the instruction was that of the period : the arithmetic liable to be over the heads of all but the better mentalities of the class ; the handwriting mechanical rather than calligra]>hic ; the spelling following analytical rather than synthetical methods. The various subjects, ne\-ertheless, were taught by teachers drawn from the liest elements of the community. It was a privilege for the boy or girl, whether of humlilc nr fortunate parentage, to be under their influence from the crude little ])rimary schools that still sur\ived from earlier days through the five grammar grades and into the high school. Public services, privately administered began to assume a new im- portance in Lowell as electric lighting, electric traction and the tele- ]>hiine came into prominence. From Horse Cars to the Trolley System — Expansion of street car transportation which was destined radically to alter the life of the community after electrification became general, had already begun before the success of the trolley car experiment at Richmond. \'irginia, was assured. Up to 1886 the Lowell Horse Railroad Company had a mono])oly of the local transportation. Their horse cars, with the flours co\ered with straw in winter, ji>gged o\er a few lines radiating from the old post office in the Hildreth building. In addition to the original Belvidere-Pawtucket street, Gorham street and Middlesex street lines, the company had made extensions on Westford and Chelmsford streets and y annual fairs and t;'ifts from friends. Or])hans lia\e heen cared for ft)r years past at the Theodore Edson Or])hanai;e, No. 13 Anne street. This orphanage, non-sec- tarian in character and sui)i)orted in part by contributions from St. .\nne's parish and in part by donations from the general public, was started in 1S75 \>y Rev. Dr. Theodore Edson, under the style of St. Mary's Orphanage. The name was changed upon the founder's death in 1884, to The Theodore Edson Or])hanage. The historic Old Stone Mouse, a landmark in l^awtucket street from the inception of the town of Lciwell, in October. i8g2. was con- veyed, through the generosity of Mrs. Josephine Ayer, of Paris, and her son Frederick Planning Ayer. of Mew York City, to one of the city's finest charities, the "Home for Young Women and Children." which had been organized in 1876. The purpose of this institution, henceforth known as the Ayer Home for Young Women and Chil- dren, is to provide a temporary home at moderate expense, to assist in finding employment and otherwise to help in the adjustment of family relations. It is likewise a home for unfortunate and destitute children who. on account of the loss of both parents or one. are left helpless and uncared for. The original officers were : President, J. K. Chase; vice-presidents, Mrs. D. S. Richardson. Mrs. E. D. Burke; clerk. Mrs, E. B. Adams; treasurer. Thomas Nesmith ; auditor. Levi .Sjirague ; jihysician. Dr. F. A. Warner; directors. Mrs. ]. K. Chase, Mrs. D. S- Richardson, Mrs. E. D. Burke. Mrs. David Gove, Mrs. Robert Wood, Mrs. W. C. Avery, Mrs. A. L. Richmond. Mrs. E. B. Adams. Levi S])rague. Francis Jewett, Horace J. Adams, Jeremiah Clark. A. G Cumnock. W^ G. Ward. Mrs. Ayer, who thus became one of Lowell's chief Isenefactors, liAcd in Paris for many years after the death of her husband. Dr. J. C. Ayer. She was a daugliter of Royal Southwick. Her uicnacjc. in the stately mansion formerly occupied by the Duchesse de Aloudry. ncc Princesse Murat. on the Esplanade des Invalides, was described by ]\Lary Bacon Ford in the "Cosmoj)olitan ALagazine" for April, 1893. Mrs. Ayer was one of the first Americans to form an extensive collec- tion of works by the modern French school of painters. To her timely help, it is well understood, the .\merican Art Association owed its existence during its first struggling years. She died in i8<;7. A branch of the Women's Christian Teiuperance L'nion was or- ganized in Lowell. I'ebruary 17, 1875. The h'ather Matthew Temjierance Institute, which has exerted much influence toward sobriety among yovmg men of Irish lineage, was formed in Lowell, janu.ary i, 1882, in response to a call issued by Florence \. H. Donoghue and P. F. Sulli\-an, later jiresident of the AFTER THE CIX'IE WAR 379 Bay State Street Railway Company. This association within a few- years became one o{ the largest and strongest of its kind anywhere. The Channing fraternity was added to the list of Lowell [jhilan- thropies on May 24, 1871. As the name indicates, it is a Unitarian organization, designed to aid the worth}- poor : to provide for religions meetings in public places and to institute courses of improving lec- tures. The fraternity was incorporated in 1884 with the following incorporators : Rev. Josiah Lafayette Seward, Benjamin Gamage Franklin, George Reed Richardson, Edward Kirk Perley. Walter U. Lawson. Ralph Fletcher Brazer, Helen Augusta W'hittier. Martha Coburn. The work of the fraternity has consisted of Sunday evening meetings in the Unitarian church and elsewhere: of lectures, concerts and occasional theatrical entertainments. The People's Club, an tirganization making for social enjoyment under democratic conditions, had its origin in the spring of 1S72. What this association has accomplished for men and women who for one reason and another could not belong to an expensive club has been of incalculable social worth. To Lowell, throughout its history, young people of good training and decent tastes have come as strangers, un- certain whether how long they will remain ; often for one reason or another averse to forming close affiliations with distinctively religious bodies. For such the People's Club has provided opportunities for cjuiet reading and study and for harmless amusements. It organized a well appointed reading room, supplied with many magazines and newspapers, long before the Public Library was so provided. The checker and chess tournaments conducted at the rooms in the Nesmith building were among the innocent and gentle diversions of scores of promising youths of the seventies and eighties. A plan for a club of this character was first Ijroached at a public meeting of March 12, 1872. in Mechanics' Hall, at which Cajitain G. \'. Fox was chairman, and Dr. F. M. Nickerson secretary. It was de- cided to organize a "social union" for the following purpose : "Its objects shall be to ])romote a place of resort in the City of Lowell to which all shall be freely invited who are in need of amusement and recreation for leisure hours and the influences of social companionship and home life." At a later meeting the name of "People's Club'' was adopted. The first officers were: President, Captain G. V. Fox: vice- president, John A. Buttrick, George F. Richardson : executive com- mittee, the foregoing and John F. McEvoy, J. H. Sawyer, Mrs. C. P. Talljot, Mrs. Horatio Wood, Mrs. Frederick .\yer, Mrs. David Gove ; treasurer. : assistant treasurer. Miss Maria Swan; secretary. lames A\'atson : assistant secretary. Miss E. O. Robbins. The mainstay of the People's Club was the untiring devotion of the Rev. Horatio Wood. Having j)erceived that the club was filling- a 38o HISTORY OF LOWPXL real need, especially among young unmarried men, this clergyman undertook the responsibility of seeing that the experiment did not fail for want of advocacy and supervision. From 1876 until his health hmke down about ten years later he was most assiduous in attendance at all meetings, in organizing entertainments, in soliciting funds. After he was no longer able to continue his labors his associates in one of the chib's annual reports paid a well deserved tribute to his efforts. Of the very practical character of his services they wrote; "For years he collected all the funds outside of the sum annually contriljuted by the corporations. * * * I le had entire charge of the libraries, buy- ing every book placed upon the shelves and choosing them with great care and skill for the readers for whom they were intended. He also engaged every lecturer, going to Boston often for those personal inter- views which he thought far beyond the force of any correspondence to explain to them the purposes of the club and to fix the engagements." The People's Club at the outset was formed for the benefit of men members. Soon, however, it was seen that a class of women em- ployed in the city would appreciate its advantages and a women's branch was formed, with headquarters in the W'yman's Exchange Iniilding, Mr. Wood's services in the interest of the People's Club, as of manv other humanitarian enterprises in Lowell, were not forgotten after his death. In July, 1893, a tablet in his memory was placed on the walls of the free Chapel of the Ministry-at-large in Lowell. It bears this inscription, written by Dr. Andrew P. Peabody, of Har- vard University: "To the memory of Rev. Horatio Wood, who by 24 years of wise, faithful and self-denying service, placed the ministr}- at-large in Lowell on a firm foundation and won for himself the honor, gratitude and love of our whole communit}-." Mr. Wood died in Lowell, May 12, 1891, aged eighty-four years. Among other charitable organizations of the city owing their in- ception to this period are the Day Nursery, started in 1885, the Dor- castrian Association, Faith Home, St. Peter's Orphan Asylum, the Holy Name Society of St. Patrick's Church, Massachusetts Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children, L'Union St. Joseph de Lowell. The multijilication of charitable agencies, with many possibilities of duplicated effort, resulted in the formation. May 6, 1881, of the Associated Charities of Lowell. The stated object of this organiza- tion, which conforms to a t}-pe familiar to many cities, is to ".give proper direction to the charities of the benevolent; to aid in dis- criminating between the deserving poor and the fradulent ; and to secure justice in the proper distribution of the contributions in aid of the stiffering.'' The historj- of most Lowell churches from 1865 to 1893 was one of AFTER THE C1\'1L WAR 381 continuance rather than of marked increase in activities. Several new ciiurches were organized in the Highlands district of the city. This was the era in which the Church of the Immaculate Conception, within surrounding landscape development, became a landmark of Belvidere. Particularly among the older Protestant churches there was a forcw arning of the struggle for existence which has been ver}' e\-ident in the present century. Without necessarily any considerable diminu- tion of natural religiosity in the population, it is unquestionable that habits of church going became less dc rigciir toward the latter end of this period than they had been at first. Efforts, naturally, were made by devoted clergy and la}-men to stay this tendenc}'. It certainly progressed less rapidly in Lowell than in many other American cities. A notable instance of a church's working against an apjjarcntly inevitable tendency came into prominence when the free church move- ment, much in evidence in Boston about 1890, was brought to the con- sideration of Lowell people in 1892. The future of John Street Con- gregational Church at this date was already very dubious. This stronghold of orthodoxy, which in the middle nineteenth century had been one of the really great churches of New England, was steadily losing attendance, after the fashion of many downtown churches, as the native American population more and more tended to move into the suburbs, or sometimes to drop all church connections. The church was obviously situated too close to Kirk street and to the First Church. Even the brilliant pastorate of Rev. Henry T. Rose failed to stay the decline, and in January, 1892, when Mr. Rose, having been called to the pastorate of the First Congregational Church of Northami)ton and being minded to accept, tendered his resignation, his letter contained the statement : ".A.bout 50 years ago the John Street church was a very prosperous organization ; its seats were all rented and were filled ; its Sunday school was large. Then its constituency was all, or nearly all, drawn from within a radius of half a mile from its doors." Mr. Rose's resignation was reluctantly accepted and a committee appoint- ed to consider and report on the free church plan, as de\eloped by Rev. C. A. Dickinson, formerly of Lowell, at Berkele}- Temple, Boston. This committee, consisting of Frank Coburn, N. G. Lamson and Dr. W. H. Lathrop, visited Mr. Dickinson's exiieriment in Boston, and to the disajjpointment of some memljers of the church, made rather a lukewarm report regarding the proliability that such success as it was having could be duplicated in Lowell. The subsequent decline of Berkeley Temple among the churches of Boston may be taken as justifying this committee in their belief that Lowell offered too limited a field for a church of this character. 382 HISTORY OF LOWPILL Lowell's First Collegiate Institution — A mo\cment to convert French-Canadians of Lnwell and other New England cities to Protes- tantism gained some impetus and for several years excited much inter- est among Americans of English ancestry. In 1878 a French Protestant Society of seven members was formed in the city by the Rev. T. G. A. Cote, who took a residence on Arlington street in a native American neighborhood, and who soon impressed local Congregationalists and others with his ability and sin- cerity. The little congregation at first worshipped in a rented h;ill. .A.S it grew in numbers a church building fund was started. In ( )cto- ber, 1881. the society held services for the first time in the plain stone church, .still standing at the corner of Fletcher and Bowers street. In 1883 a jubilee was celebrated to commemorate the extinction of the last dollar of indelitedness. Mr. Cote, in the meantime, had been chosen general missionary among the French-Canadians of Massachu- setts and had been succeeded in his pastorate by the Rev. Calvin E. -Vmaron, B. D. In a little publication entitled "The Evangelization of the French- Canadians of New England," Mr. Amaron proposed that steps be taken to found a French Protestant College, to be conducted in Lowell. Cordial ap])ro\'al of his proposal was offered by several of the local ministers. The college was duly ojiened in rented quarters in Octo- ber, 1886, with si.xteen ])Upils. During the first year the attendance increased tu twenty-five and \v(juld have gone to at least forty had accommodations been available. The officers of the college at its inception were: President, J. M. Greene, D. D. ; clerk. Rev. C. A. Dickinson; treasurer, George A. Hanscom; executive committee. Rev. Owen Street, D. D., Rev. C. E. Amaron, B. D., Rev. C. H. Willcox, Martin L. Ilamblet. In the secimd year of the French Protestant College some fifty- one boys and young men sought admission. During this school year the trustees entertained an offer of a gift of land at Springfield, (jn con- dition that the institution be mo\-ecl to that city. Certain manual training advantages, much needed for the class of students attracted Iiy this college, were accessible in Springfield and were at the time lacking in Lowell. In the third \-ear, therefore, the new college was mo\ed from its birthplace. Its subsec|uent histor\- belongs to that of the city of Springfield. Social Aspects of Lowell's Late Nineteenth Century — Socially considered, Lowell oi the later decades of the nineteenth century was still a pleasant place to live in. There was a constant and healthy infusion of new elements of population, due to the fre(iuenc\' with which manufacturers and executi\es came to Lowell from elsewhere — from other .\merican cities and often from Great Britain. The fami- AFTER THE CIVIL- WAR 383 lies of these newcdiners helped to jjrevent the unfortunate condition in which everybody in a community is a cousin to everybody else. The geographical layout of the city was, and is, somewhat con- ducive to social diversity. Belvidere, the Highlands, Centralville, Pawtucketville and Middlesex have tended each to develop its own traditions and customs. The early rivalry between Belvidere and Pawtucket streets as a place of residence of the wealthiest families was visibly disriiijiearing by 1890; Pawtucket street, historically the oldest and most aristocratic section of the city, had been hopelessly distanced by Belvidere. The Yorick and Highland Clubs — Ambition to emulate the larger cities in cluli life may lia\ c helped tn bring into being two of the most ambitious new social projects i>f this ])eriod of Lowell history, the Yorick Club and the Highland Club. The Highland Club was dedicated February 6, 1892. This struc- ture was designed by Messrs. Stickney and Austin for situation on a tract of 90,000 feet of land on Harvard and Princeton streets. The dedicatory exercises were thoroughly impressive. They were in charge of a committee consisting of Colonel J. W. Bennett, chairman ; Orrin B. Ranlett, C. C. Streeter, Charles W. Wilder, C. W. Pierce. The chairmen of other committees were: Reception, William E. Liv- ingston ; decorations, E. S. Hylan ; music, D. E. Dwelly ; costumes, Fred Home: supper, Frank H. Haynes ; billiards, C. Arthur Abliott ; carriages, J. S. Hanson ; doorkeeper, George W. Dearborn. A club, for "clubable men," of a sort familiar in the larger cities, first took form in Lowell in the eighties. The Yorick Club, at which in these later years a male visitor to the city is reasonably sure to be entertained, dates from a meeting held November n, 18S2, at the home of Joseph A. Nesmith. the purpose stated in the call being to organize "a young men's social club." At this and at a subsequent meeting at the home of George Richardson the club was definitely formed. A room was hired in Wyman's Exchange. The club began with a mem- bership of twenty and the following officers : President, Percy Parker : secretary, Frederick W. Stickney ; treasurer, Frederick A. Chase ; directors. George R. Richardson and Walter M. Lancaster. The other members of the club were: Joseph A. Nesmith, James E. Nesmith, George S. Motley. Theodore E. Parker, Jr.. \\'alter U. Lawson, Paul Butler, Samuel E. Stott, Charles H. Hooke, Harry V. Huse, Edward Ellingwood, Herbert P. JefTerson, Frederick C. Church, Gerard Bement, Harry A. Brown, Frank W. Hnwe. The name of "Yorick Club" was adopted May 19, 1883. The Yorick Club continued for some years to occupy rented quar- ters ; after May, 1883, in the then new Post Office building in Merri- mack square; then in Room 42, Hildreth building, and lieginning Julv 384 HISTORY OF LOWELL I, 18S5, in a suite of rooms in the Mansur building-. Central street. The apartments last named served the club for sixteen years. Finally, after a fire which swept the rooms in the Mansur building in June, 1900, action was taken toward securing the present club house, a three- stor}- brick house built by the Merrimack Manufacturing Company for occupancy by some of its high officials. This house was bought, altered and furnished at a cost of about $60,000 and was occupied for the first time on the evening of July 22, 1901. Deterioration of Huntington Hall — The safety of historic Hunt- ington Hall, over the old Boston and Lowell "depot," began to l)e seri- ously questioned in March, 1892, after a bazaar for the benefit of St. John's Hospital, in which considerable sagging of the floor was re- corded. J. Frank Page recalled that in 1856, when Rufus Choate spoke in Lowell, the hall settled in the middle "abdut an inch, but it seemed to us as if it were ten feet." At that time there was a public scare, but Mr. Page's father, Jonathan Page, was engaged to bolster the floor with two iron trusses and after that no more alarm was felt. The 1892 incident presaged the day when this famous hall, with which so much of the communal life of the city had been connected, must be abolished in the name nf public safety. The Era of Intensive Athletics — Outdoor sports had an extraordi- nary expansion in Lciwell after the Civil War — one to which at least suggesti\e reference should be made. This was the period in which baseball became the national .\merican game; tennis, the characteristic athletic amusement of the well-to-do (with golf as a lively competitor from about 1885 i>n\\;ird ) ; Rugby footliall an autiminal dixersion of college students and high school l)oys. Lowell, through its consider- able British and Canadian population, likewise became celebrated in New England for its devotion to cricket and association football. Aquatic sports, in particular, had a vogue in Lowell about 1880 such as they have not enjo^-ed since. Throughout the summer season the reaches of the Merrimack above the f.alls were alive with shells and working boats. In those halcyon days of oarsmanship good races were rowed b\- "Big Pat" Mclnerny, ex-Councilman Driscoll, janitor of the \'esper Boat Club; John Tweed, W. S. Stevens. Jack Barry. Tom Butler, Ralph Brazer and many another. Above all "lul" Han- Ion, the world's chaminon, liked the Lowell course and used to train on it. One of the present historian's proud recollections is to have helped put H anion's shell into the water at least twice and to have received a nod of acknowledgment from the sturdv oarsman. No Fourth of July amusements of late years can have equaled in general ]iopularity the regattas of those years when for miles upstream on both sides of the river every available \antage spot was denselv thronged. AFTER THE CIVIL WAR 385 The Vesper Boat Club was chartered April 9, 1875. It at first had its headquarters at Corbett's boathouse on Pawtucket street, lately moving to its own clubhouse at the head of the Pawtucket canal. In the first decade of its existence sculling was a very popular sport on the river, and the \'esper Club became one of the chief centres of aquatic interest in New England. The pleasure of canoeing began to be appreciated about 18S0. Two or three of the members bought birch canoes in Canada. These craft were not altogether satisfactory. The cedar and canvas canoes were just beginning to be known and soon there was a little fleet of these. Harper's Young People, and per- haps other juvenile periodicals of the time, gave expositions of ama- teur canoe building, and many youths who frequented the boathouses helped to put together canvas canoes which, when made, might or might not need a ballast of sand bags to prevent them from tipping over. Canoe sailing came into vogue toward 1890 and, largely through Paul Butler's example and precept, the Vesper Club took a leading place at all American canoe meets. Local baseball was never, perhaps, in the history of Lowell main- tained at a greater height of public frenzy than in 1887 and there- about. In February of that year the Lowell Baseball Corporation was organized with F. W. Howe, president; Edwards Cheney, secretary and treasurer ; directors, Edward Gallagher, J. F. Callahan and H. E. Shaw. To review the history of the succeeding teams with which Lowell was represented in the New England League might not com- port with the traditions of dignified historical writing. To the future student, however, of the manners and customs of the late nineteenth century the sporting pages of the Lowell newspapers will long be a source of huge amusement and instruction. In the summer of 1888, during a spirited contest with Portland for the championship, popular excitement reached an intensity that has probalily never since been surpassed, and Lowell at that time had no more popular citizen than the heavy-hitting little shortstop, Hugh Duffy, afterwards a distin- guished figure among the teams of the major leagues. The Twilight of Willow Dale — Milder sports such as fishing from flatboats, swimming in fresh water and riding "flying horses," were cultivated at the several picnic resorts of the neighborhood : at Willow Dale, Long Pond, Nabnasset, Haggett's Pond and Tj'ng's Island. An account of the origin of the picturesque resort on Tyng's Pond has already been given. It remains to chronicle the stirring events which attended the establishment of a second resort on this beautiful bodv of water and which forecasted the gradual waning of the popu- larity of Willow Dale. Resentment and resistance of the now aged Jonathan Bowers and his hardy sons to street railway encroachment upon their pretty soli- 1-25 386 HISTORY OF LOWELL tude created a stir in Lowell in the spring of 1890. In the intervening years "Johnny" had carried on his business in his own inimitable way. The place was respectable and well kept up. It entertained hundreds of Sunday school picnics. High school graduating classes often held their dinners in the long banquet hall that projected out over the water. The fleet of flatlioats that made harbor in a tiny co\e, with sandy beach, were among the safest vessels that ever swam. li.xcept for this jMcnic ground, much concealed by rows of willows, the shores of the lake were of almost primeval wildness. On the eastern side a sandy carriage road ran among the pines and from this there was a short cut leading over to Long Pond, where the late Charles Coburn had an even simpler and more rural resort for picnickers. Came suddenly the Lowell & Dracut Trolley Company, with plans to buy up the whole eastern shore, install a dance hall, a rustic theatre, steamboat landing and other appurtenances of a new type of pleasure park. The cars began to bring to the "pond," now called Lake Mascuppic, cosmopolitan crowds. A whole city was suddenly emptied upon a quiet countryside. Despite the obvious opportunities for making more money than ever before, Mr. Bowers, his wife, his sons and his nephew, Edward Caldwell, appear genuinely to have resented the change wdiich elec- tric traction had produced in their affairs. Most irritating of all, the designation strips on the electric cars bore the announcement that passengers were transported to "XMllow Dale." This was adding insult to injury. On .\pril 6. 1890. Jonathan Bowers, through his attorney, warned August Eels, president of the street railway company, that his organization had no right to use the title "Willow Dale." The communication claimed that the name was an essential part of assets accumulated during fifty-three years' occu- pancy of the place. "The Messrs. Bowers are asking for no favors in this matter from your company, and thej- have instructed me to grant none," was one of the emphatic statements of the letter. The street railway people apparently were anxious to avoid trouble, for on May 8 it was reported that an honoral)le agreement had l)een reached and that the name "Willow Dale" would be withdrawn from the cars. It was also intimated that the street car company had supposed it was doing Mr. Bowers a favor by advertising his place. On May 28, however, to the amazement and amusement of all Lowell, an assault case was filed in the Police Court against the two sons of Jonathan Bovvers and their Caldwell cousin, on the ground that they li.'id thrown President Eels to the ground in an altercation regarding a wooden fence which the Willow Dale proprietor had erected to part his place from the electric railway domain. The elder Bowers was a witness in fjivor of his boys, who were finally, on June AFTER THE CI\IL WAR 387 10 discharged from custody liy Judge Hadley on a finding to the eflfect that Mr. Eels and his men iiad no right of way on the Bowers property and that unnecessary force had not been used in the ejectment. A simultaneous development of Lakeview and Willow Dale fol- lowed in the next few years. Camps and cottages sprang up in every direction around the lake. The prosperity of the Bowers family pre- sumably was not al)riilged by the enhanced value of their lands and by the increased demand for their products, including their celebrated Saratoga chips. The character of the whole region, howexer, was rapidly changed — some might say cheapened. The genial proprietor of Willow Dale lived some years longer. He was immortalized in facile verse of "Ered" Greenhalge's, who sometime about 1892 or thereabouts wrote an often cjuoted Willow Dale song, to be sung to the air of "Cockles and Mussels," the first second and last stanzas of which may be quoted : Oh, good Johnnie Bowers, how jocund the hours, That sang their sweet chime o'er thy glimmering lake ; In June or December, 'tis sweet to remember, Thy crispy potatoes and juicy beefsteak. Chorus — Oh, John of the Dale ! Oh, John of the Dale, We'll praise thy good suppers. Oh, John of the Dale. Thy face apostolic (yet just a bit frolic) Has brightened our banquets for many a year; And now thy deep laughter would ring to the rafter, .•\nd wake all the echoes on mountain and mere. Chorus — Oh, John of the Dale ! etc. Then soft be thy pillow beneath the green willow. And never may sorrow thy rosy cheek pale ; And we will remember, in June or December, To praise thy good suppers, Oh, John of the Dale. Chorus — Oh, John of the Dale ! etc. Willow Dale for sotiie years had a rival as a picnic resort in Tyng's Island, the ancient Wickasee, which was once Wannalancet's place of residence. Especially in the days of the steamer "Evangeline," which had been somehow brought up from the sea and which plied the course froin the head of Pawtucket canal under command of "Coinmo- dore" Edward B. Peirce, "the island" drew almost numberless excur- sions. In 1887 Daniel Emery and a number of other Lowell men took the place over and continued to run it. A personal recollection is that its character as a resort did not improve as the years went on. It later became the home of the combined Wsper and Country clubs. Two Historical Celebrations in Lowell — Preservation of local his- torical data such as have been extensively used in cmnpiling this 388 HISTORY OF LOWELL record of the growth of an American city, began to be a matter of organized effort soon after the war. The formation of an Old Residents' Historical Association in 1868 meant much to every future historian of Lowell and of Massachu- setts. The papers which were read at its meetings sujiplemented with wealth of detail and anecdote the dry records of the municipality and of the townships out of which it was formed. The association, for- tunately, was started at a time when several of the founders of the citv were still alive. Out of their personal recollections it was possible to save material that would otherwise have been lost completely. The association was first proposed in September, 1868, by Z. E. Stone, then editor of the Vox Populi. On the 21st of the following November a meeting was called at the bookstore of Joshua X. Merrill. Fifty-four persons were present. George Brownell served as chair- man, Mr. Stone as secretary. The following were appointed a com- mittee to formulate a plan for permanent organization : John O. Green, J. G. Peabody, Charles Morrill, George Brownell. E. B. Patch, E. M. Read, Samuel Fay, Artemas L. Brooks, Charles Hovey, Z. E. Stone, E. B. Howe. The attendance at the next meeting, on December 21, was so large that it was necessary to adjourn to Jackson Hall, where the constitu- tion was read and adopted and officers chosen as follows: President, John O. Green; vice-president, A. L. Brooks; secretary and treasurer, Z. E. Stone. The Historical Association held its first annual meeting in May, 1869, at which time it had eighty-five members. In 1871 Alfred Gil- man became secretary and to his efforts in the next eight years were due in large measure the association's many admirable publications. The greatest commemorative occasion in Lowell history prior to the centennial that will doubtless be appropriately celebrated in 1926, was the semi-centennial celebration of March i, 1876. The initiative in this celebration came from Councilman Charles Cowley, LL. D., born in England in 1832, educated in the public schools and in the law office of Josiah G. Abbott and Samuel A. Brown. As one of the historians of Lowell, upon whose works every subsequent writer has drawn, and a most enthusiastic member of the Old Residents' Historical Association, Judge Cowley was peculiarly fitted to conduct such an affair as was finally arranged at Huntington Hall. The first premonition of a celebration was in Feliruary, 1875, when Judge Cowley, then a member of the crjuimon cy the Germania Orchestra, con- ducted by Carl Zerrahn. the celebrated leader who had brought these musicians irom Berlin about twenty years previously. The prayer was by Rev. Dr. Theodore Edson. General Benjamin F. Butler made one of the capital addresses of his career, filled with fascinating remi- niscences and touching tributes. Other addresses at the afternoon session were made by John A. Lowell, nephew of Francis Cabot Lowell ; Rt. Rev. Thomas M. Clark, Protestant Episcopal Bishnji (if Rhode Island, who had been first prin- cipal of the Lowell High School ; Hon. Marshall P. Wilder, a manu- facturer whose connection with the Spindle City was close for many years; Rev \. A. Miner. L^niversalist clergyman of Boston, who held AFTER THE CIML WAR 391 a pastorate in Lowell in the forties ; Dr. John O. Green, representing the Old Residents' Historical Society. Letters containing valuable data were read from Judge Josiah G. Abbott, Seth Ames, Samuel Batchelder and others. An original poem was recited by John S. Colby, editor of the "Vox Populi." A public levee and reception in the evening ended one of the red letter days of this era of Lowell history. The 1876 celebration had one outcome that aft'ects the centennial celebration to be held, presumably, in March 1926. While the city was still talking of the inspirational exercises in Huntington Hall, the councilmen received the following letter from one of the members of the celebration committee : Lowell, March 7, 1876. To the City Council of the City of Lowell : Gentlemen : — Having lived in the town and city of Lowell since 182S and been in trade since 1830, and I believe now the only person in Lowell in trade at that date, and having been thankful to Almighty God for his great goodness to me, I therefore wish in this form to give unto others of my fellow-men, for their benefit and improvement in the future here in Lowell, where I have lived so long and enjoyed so much, the small gift of one thousand dollars, if the City Council will accept the same, upon the following conditions, to wit : I wish the money to be put on interest for fifty years, the centennial year of the town of Lowell, and the interest added to the principal either annually or semi-annually, until that time, when all but the original sum of one thousand dollars may be expended for the benefit and improvement of the city and citizens of Lowell as the City Council may determine, by a two thirds' vote, upon the manner of disposing of the same at that time, it may be left to succeeding city governments to dispose of by the same two-thirds vote of the City Council. The original one thou- sand dollars shall again be put at interest as before described, and at the end of every fifty years thereafter, all but the original principal may be disposed of in the same manner as before mentioned. Respectfully yours. H.\p(;ood \\'right. N. B. — If there is no objection it may be called the Hapgood Wright Centennial Trust Fund. This gift was, of course, thankfully accepted by the representa- tives of the city government, and the Hapgood Wright Centennial Trust Fund was put at interest. Mr. Wright, whose benefaction thus initiated, will normally ex- tend to Lowell's latest posterity, was born at Concord, Massachusetts, March 28, :8ii. His early life was passed on a farm. As a youth he became intensely interested in Unitarianism, through his acquaintance with Rev. Ezra Ripley, then living at the Old Manse. In 1828 \oung \\'right was sent by his father to Lowell to sell some produce. The energy and bustle of the new tciwn impressed him, and he determined to settle in it. A short time later he found a clerkship in a shoe shop 392 HISTORY OF LOWELL on Central street and thus entered upon his long and honorable mer- cantile career. From 1830 to 1840 he was in ])artnership with Llijah Mixer. From the first he was prominent in the affairs of the new Unitarian church. In 1844 he actively assisted in the foundation of the Ministry-at-Large. In i86y he served in the Board of .\idernien. "Probably no trader in Lowell," said his contemporary, Benjamin Walker, "has ever exceeded Mr. Wright in the length of his business experience, and certainly no one has e\-er acquired and maintained a more enviable reputation than he for upright and honorable dealings." In iSSi Dartmouth College gave Mr. Wright a well-merited honorary degree of Master of Arts. He died May 14, 1896. Thmughout his long life Mr. W'right maintained a live interest in his birthplace and when, in September, 1883, Concord celebrated the J50th anniversary of its founfling. he endowed a memorial fund in the same amount and under the same general conditions as that given to Lowell. He also had given the "Lowell Courier" to the Concord Librarv frmn 1843 onward, and at the time of the celebrati(_in he gave the town $300, the interest to be used to make the gift perpetual as long as such a news])aper shall be [lublished. The 1886 Celebration — A fitting celebration of the fiftieth anniver- sary of the incorporation of the City of Lnwell was arranged in the winter of 1886. One of the mo\ing spirits in this dignified and api)roj)riate cele- bration was Councilman Laurence J. Smith, who introduced the origi- nal order and who directed many of the subsequent arrangements. Mr. Smith was thoroughly representative of what the city was doing for the children of newcomers from abroad. Born in County Meath, Ireland, June 13, 1850, he was brought to Lowell as a child by his ])arents and given public school education up to the age of four- teen. He then had thirteen years' service with the Middlesex Manu- facturing Company, acquiring a thorough knowledge of textiles and textile values. In the meantime he had been employed during cer- tain e\-enings of the week as a clothing salesman and had become in- terested in the merchandising of fabrics. In 1877 he was made man- ager of the Lowell One Price Clothing Company, then one of the ("coming concerns" of the city. Mr. Smith's ability as buyer and seller of fabrics made him a source of strength to this store. He inter- ested himself early in public affairs, serving as a Democratic member of the Common Councils of 1881, 1882, 1883 and 1886; as a member of the library directorate and the police commission. He was one of the early memliers and later sujireine cliief ranger of the Foresters of America. It fell to this admiral)le citizen to take the lead in express- ing public gratitude for the far-sightedness of the founders of Lowell. AFTi'.R 11 II'; L\\[[. WAR 393 With active approval and coo])eration of Mayor J. C. Ahl)ott a series of meetings was set tor April I, iSS6, in Huntington Hall. At the morning exercises four hunch-ed children of the public sciiools were brought together as a chorus under direction of H. D. Dav. Councilman Smith presided. The ])ra}er was by Rev. George W. iiicknell. l-^irm Principal C. I'. Chase, of the high school, read a retrospective address, many extracts and citations of which have already appeared in this narrative. In the afternoon Mayor Abbott gave a lirief introductory address. Then after a prayer by the Rev. Owen Street, Hon. Frederic T. Green- halge delivered one of the best commemorative addresses of his career, calling attention to patent defects in the working out of the Lowell plan, but crediting the founders with large insight and noble aims. In the e\e)iing came a general levee and reception. The committee in charge of these exercises consisted of: Honor- ary chairman, ]Mayor J. C. Abbott; chairman, Laurence J. Smith; aldermen, Jeremiah Crowley and James B. Francis ; councilmen, Ros- well 'M. B'lUtwell. Charles S. Richardson and Charles H. Hobson. On the reception committee were William F. Salmon, Artemas S. Tyler, Oliver E. Cushing, Thomas R. Garity, George A. iMarden, Solon \V. Stevens, Albert A. Haggett, Prescott C. Gates, Walter Coburn, \\ alter H. Leighton, James W. Bennett, George F. Lawton, Da\ id W . O'Brien. The chief marshal was General Charles A. R. Dinion, who was assist v'd by the following young men: Paul Butler, Edward H. Shattuck, W. E. Westall, John Welch, Robert E. Crowley, Edward Ellingwood, H. G. C). Weymouth, Royal W. Gates, James A. Carney. J. H. Carniichael, A. W David, E. B. Conant. Charles F. Blanchard, Henry \'. Huse, W. W. Tuttle, The addresses, of this celebration, in- cluding man\- letters of congratulation and reminiscence from former residents of the city, were subsequently published. H 77 78 'vv^ii .^^•^ '.£StV •i"\ '''5- n'^ V . . •*■„ .^' o. ,.•?-• 0' -' ■ "' > ,% c^" ,';-:• =^ o " o ,0^ ■V .<>' , c " <= , <^^ ,-e> . r^W ' -? -^ '~VaV-''' ■I' ,0- />•;;:• %C -:>, .'y ■v •^. A ' . . > ■ .0 ^ ^^ \\ "-^ >P-'.K ■^^^■■^:^ .0' -■'■•- o. ■<-■% ..A'- ,0' <^, ,■■ 0' ,,\ '/i • ••( ■ t^ , '> o t- a.)^-., --..!<> ^^^ ■>', ^o■ .•',: ''if'-^ ,/ S' '■f >j ^ * . ' - - --> c s\"^ -c A' .•\ '■^ ''r^sffi^'^ ^^ . .A"- 'A % °^ ^■'j ^^ ..., \> ' *•* ■/ °^ a'^ .b^ ^o. % a'" ly , ♦ • '. v- v^^ •7 V/ • * ' * ' ' c 0~ <" , \' „^ '■ ^, ■.■■ *> °^ ■; 4 "^^^ >-o^ .-C- ^-^ "oV -:>■ ■ ^^% ^-J^S J'\ '^ym^ ^'% ■ -' /""^ .0' ■^x. ^^ .-to.. V v. .^ 0^ 4- '*■ ' ^ .A. .-». A t- i-<>''' ■^^. -N*ij ,^^ ^*=-^^ ^^ ■5- >Cr. ^J-, ^°-^<^. '^^>..^" .^v^. V ,0^ "^o JAN 78 ,\^ N. MANCHESTER INDIANA >^ •^^. .A*'