LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, f FORCE COLLECTION.] $ -HP- ' #| i UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, f ®$m 9^sssws» OR WORKS OF DARKNESS BROUGHT TO LIGHT. Being a Retrospect of the Anti-Christian conduct of some of the leading characters in the vSociety called FRIENDS, towards that eminent and devoted Servant of the Lord, ELIAS HICKS, when on his last visit of Gospel Love to the inhabitants of the City ot Philadelphia. ALSO, A brief statement of facts, illustrative of the treatment of that faithful Messenger of the Gospel, PRISCILLA HUNT, at a meeting for worship, held in Pine street Meeting House, — together, with part of a discourse, delivered by her, at Green- street Meeting House. ** Whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness, shall be heard in the light 5 %nd that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets, shall be proclaimed upos the house tops." PHILADELPHIA ; PRINTED FOR THECOMPILEIU 1824. LC Control Number liil tmp96 031685 PREFACE. The following authentic documents are offered to the pub- lic with a view to shew to what stretch of power, men, cloth- ed with ecclesiastic authority, would extend their influence, were they not restrained by the Constitution of these United States, which guarantees to every citizen the rights of conscience and freedom of sentiment ; and any infringement on these sacred privileges, by men, let them be ever so dig- nified, they will (in this enlightened age) meet with opposi- sition from the intelligent and liberal minded part of every association over whom these pretended Spiritual Guides sit as Censors, and with an imperious sway judge down all that venture to dissent from them in matters of opinion ; however the Lord's faithful Servants and Handmaidens have been re- jected and persecuted from city to city, as the following facts evidently demonstrate. N. B. The above remarks were not intended to apply to the religious society called Friends, generally, but only to a few, who would, if they only had power vested in them, lord it over the whole heritage of God : however, their machinations are unveiled, and the worthy characters against whom they combined, were cordially and sentimentally re- ceived by the generality of Friends, both in this city and adjacent country ; and thousands assembled to hear the Gospel preached in its primitive purity and simplicity^ ancl with power and demonstration. Philadelphia, 4th month 14th, 1824, DARK DESIGNS MANIFESTED. In the Ninth Month, 1822, previous to Elias Hicks com- ing to this City, at a meeting for Suffering, several of the members were privately requested to stop, at the rise of the Meeting ; accordingly, on the adjournment, Jonathan Evans, Ellis Yarnall, Samuel Bettle, Samuel P. Griffitts, Richard Jordan, Joseph Whitehall, and several others, re- mained in the Meeting house till the rest had gone- -when Jonathan Evans rose and spoke to the following import, viz : I expect you have heard that Elias Hicks has obtained from his Monthly Meeting a certificate to visit Friends in this city, and as it is well known that he holds doctrines that are not doctrines of Friends, it is necessary some steps should be taken to prevent him from disseminating them among us ; he is full of words, and it will answer no purpose to argue with him. Richard Jordan and Joseph Whitehall, are present, and can state to you what they heard from himself. Then, the above named persons, one after the other, rose and stated what they said were the doctrines held by Elias Hicks ; after gome desultory conversation, several persons were appointed to wait upon him as soou as he might reach this city ; among the number thus nominated, were Ellis Yarnall and Samuel P. Griffitts, who called upon him very early after his arrival. — Queri/. Was not this unconstitutional, and contrary to good order, and most certainly a conspiracy against the peace and harmony of Society. And from this proceeding, all the con- fusion which subsequently ensued arose ; but, providentially, all their* machinations proved abortive, and recoiled with confusion upon the heads of their projectors ; and this may be justly attributed to the independence of the Society : and one would have reasonably supposed, it would have taught the Pharisaical spirit with whom they originated, a useful 6 $esson,by the which, he might have profited more than it ap- pears he has done — O ye modern Nimrod's — ye " mighty hunters before the Lord !" erect a tribunal in your own breasts, before you are called to the tribunal of Him whose prerogative you have wantonly assumed : jud?e yourselves by the Golden Rule, for by this you must be judged. Institute a just comparison, I pray you, between the tokens of Divine approbation (as the seals to his embassy) bestowed on the Gospel labours of this venerable servant of the Lord, and your own, and if you are not void of sensibility, it will give a chill to your ambition, rebuke your imperious spirit, and change the voice of vituperation into humble confession, and self-re- proach. I have made the above remarks for the man of sen- sibility and candour who may deign to read, ponder, and be wise while time and opportunity is afforded. As for the bigot, blind with prejudice and mad with intolerance, I must leave him in his sins and in his blood, to hug his ever beloved pre- judices, and to roll the precious manna of asps und^r his tongue, which will prove corrosive poison to the heart in the end. — May the Lord alarm and unmask the hypocrite, and grant him light, life, and salvation, Letter from Thomas Eddy to John Warder. New York, 10th Month 18th, 1822. My dear friend, — I send the annexed to thee in hopes it maybe useful for such Friends as thee thinks proper to offer it, for their perusal ; if approved by thee it may be handed to any other Friends. Please see W. Evans, show it to him, and if he or any others wish to copy it, please permit them : if it would be more extensively useful, 1 have no objection that 10 'copies be printed. It was done in a hurry, and might have been improved, if I had time to copy It , nowever, it can be cor- rected with you. It mav be of more use if it should not be known to be written by me, or that it came from New York. Elias gave large notice to have a public meeting at Newark, but the people knew his sentiments and would not att- nd, except about a dozen of the lower class. Please see Wm. Evans or Thomas Evans soon — I wish thee to write me soon. Tlr: son Benjamin will perhaps copy the annexed, so as it may not be read in my hand writing — Letters addressed to me as usual, at New York, will be handed me next day. Thy affec- tionate friend, THOMAS EDDY. Facts and observation* illustrative of the present state of society in New York. , If we take a view of the general state of our religious so* ciety from the days of G. Fox, it will be found, that there has seldom been divisions amongst them on account of the intro- duction of new doctrines It is true, an opposition to order and discipline appeared at different periods, but this at no time was of long continuance. The annual epistles of the yearly meeting of London, and various other documents that may be met with in the writings of Friends, serve to shew that the So- ciety in Europe and America, were uniformly preserved in a wonderful manner, in love and amity. This happy state of things lasted till the t'me of Hannah Barnard's going to Eng. in the year — . During her visit to Ireland, she introduced in her public comments, and occasionally in her intercourse with the families of Friends, sentiments of unbelief as to some parts of 'lie Holy Scriptures— on the weak ground that we are not obliged to believe what we cannot understand or compre- hend ; raid finding a disposition in many to join with her, she ver, soon manifested that she did not unite with the society respecting a belief in the divinity of Christ and other mat- ters relating to the fundamental doctrines of the christian re- ligion. These sentiments very soon spread, and particularly 8 in the North of Ireland a number of all ranks in society became infected with her speculative notions, and in consequence of this, a confused state of things occurred, that had never be- fore taken place in Society. — Great pains were taken by these deluded people to lessen the divine authority of the Scriptures, and thus, considering them no longer a test by which doc- trines might be tried and in which our early Friends on all occasions declared their willingness to appeal — many disor- ders occurred and strange notions were taken up in different places. The religious observance of set-day was deemed a mark of superstition, and to testify their disapprobation, the females employed themselves on that day at their needlework, and in some places the men worked at their usual occupa- tions. Every species of church government or discipline was by them dispersed with — all was to be done by revelation, either to peruse the Scriptures, go to Meeting, or the perform- ance of any other religious duty. These baneful principles were so widely spread, that some eminent ministers, distin- guished elders and others who had been foremost in society, sent to their respective Monthly meetings their resignations as members in Society ; after some time those of the younger class, and others who had not before been considered as active members, came forward and put in force the discipline by dis- owning such of the delinquents as had not already resigned their right of membership — those separately not uniting among themselves soon dwindled, and at the present day are scarcely known ; indeed, many of them were favored with the light of their own folly and made suitable acknowledgements, by which means, they were restored to the unity of their friends. Hannah Barnard, who appeared to be the ostensible author and promoter ol these disorders, was silenced in England as a minister of the Monthly meeting of Devonshire and Quarterly meeting of London ; which judgment was afterwards confirm- ed on her appealing to the Yearly Meeting of London : and on ber return to America 3 she was disowned by the Month!/ meeting of Hudson. In England there were very few that advocated the sentiments and conduct of Hannah Barnard and the seperatists in Ireland, among the few were William Rathbone and Thomas Foster, both men of education and pos- sessed of considerable literary talents, each of them published a book taking part with T T annah Barnard, and advocating Unitarian doctrines, on which account they were both dis- owned. The circumstances attending the case of Thomas Foster were very singular, and as regarded society, were highly important; he had united himself with the Unita- rian Books Society, which was formed for the express pur- pose of spreading books favorable to the Unitarian doctrine, and in 1 8 1 or 11, he published a tract containing a review of the London Yearly meeting Epistle, in which he endeavored to prove that the sentiments therein expressed were opposite to those held by the society and particularly by our early Friends, who he insisted held Unitarian doctrines and es- teemed Christ only as a man and a great prophet, &c On this account he was disowned by Rad( iifTe Monthly meeting, on which he appealed to the London Quarterly meeting, which appointed 16 of the most eminent Friends in the soci- ety as a committee, who sat 6 days in order to give him a full heating, r'e introduced before the committee a new version 1 1' the New Testament, in order to prove wrong trans- lations, and divers interpolations in the version in common use ; and he also urged many extracts he had made from Penn's • ed, and whose conduct should be so extremely inconsistent. It is indeed a most deplorable state of society when ic is considered that a Quarterlv Meeting should sanction a ma,< to go abroad to visit other Yearly Meetings, who has been for some time prorogating principles which tend to destroy the christian religion. If however the sentiments of each indi- vidual could have been known and declared, there would have been exhibited such a formidable opposition, that such a certificate would never Lave been granted him ; it was ob- tained in consequence of his adherents on Long Island imme- diately getting up one after another expressing approbation, so that those who otherwise might have said something to dis- countenance the measure, were deterred from expressing their sentiments, besides it so happened teat very few were present from New York, except those who were so blindly prejudic- ed in his favor that they cannot persuade themselves he can do or say any thing wrong. It is said only two Friends showed any disapprobation and one of them stated he thought he thought it would be very incorrect to retain in the cer- tificate as itAvas read by the Clerk, the words " fully united with ;" a particular adherent of Elias Hicks, remarked, that as so many hed united he thought it would be very proper to retain those worcle ; the Friends again urged for them to be left out. The Meeting then directed they should be omitted ; yet notwithstanding this conclusion of the Meeting, the Clerk has furnished a cetiificate in which those words are in- serted !* In short if we believe the words of Christ that the * We are assured by a Friend who was present at the Quarterly Meeting of Westbury , that no such opposition as stated above took place. The circum- stances as they occurred were simply these,— after a very general ex P rcs : sion of unity, one simple Friend observed, that he thought the word "full' might be spared ; a pause, as is common in such cases, ensued, and no other expressing his approbation of the proposition, the word was retained, and that without any observation on the part of the Clerk : so that the assertion that the Clerk inserted words in the endorsement, which had been agreed to be omitted by the Meeting, is altogether unfounded and false. 17 Louse divided against itself is brought to desolation, then we may tremble when we find such a man ( ountenanced in ad- vancing doctrines that go to destroy the directs foundation of our society, and lay waste its first principles, and that he should be permitted to go to other places to produce the same divisions that he has already produced at New York. The injury that society has already received through the conduct of this man has been very great. Highly respectable persons of other denominations, charge our Society with being Unita- rians; when they are told this charge is untrue they reply they have heard E. Hicks openly and publicly avow this doctrine, and as he is an acknowledged minister in the Society of Friends, and as they allow him to go about the country to hold meetings, of course the doctrines delivered by him must be considered as held by the society. It is very humiliating to observe there are ministers among us who so much admire E. Hicks as to imitate and copy alter him at least in the un- christian and violent manner in which he abuses the clergy— Indeed they try if possible to < xceed him in this respect; Elias Hicks, at a public meeting at Long Island, at a place where no Friends reside, and in company with his cousin Elias, in the course of a long communication, disclaimed in a most se- vere manner against the Clergy, their Common Prayer Book, and many of the religious observances of the Church of Eng- land, one of their ministers was present; he told them you might search the kennels of any great city, and take soldiers, sailors, and the very worst of mankind, and they would be more likely to enter into the kingdom of Heaven than the hireling priest. Another preacher, Dr. Carey of Saratoga, speaking in the same spirit against ministers of other denominations, at a public meeting at which a number were present, rot mem- bers of our Society, burst out with these expressions : I insist upon it that one hireling is worse than ten old devils ; and at another public meeting he said, " I will tell you how they make a hireling — they first send a young mm to an academy 18 for a few years, they then send him to Eliphalet Nott to finish him, and then the yonng devil is sent abroad into the world to do all the mischief he can." In this way those people, in- stead of being under the calm influence of the Gospel, which would preserve them in a meek, humble, quiet spirit, present the phantoms of their own wayward, foolish imaginations, and presume with daring impiety to bar the gates of Heaven against all whom from the influence of early education adopt a different mode of offering worship to the Almighty. If all who differ from us in religious opinions are to be doomed to destruction in the next world, it might be asked these deluded people, what has been the lot of many of our Friends who were ministers, that a few years ago bought and sold their fellow creatures as slaves? surely no considerate man will pretend to say, that hireling ministers are worse for being such than slaveholders. But the conduct of these men defeats their own views by giving way to their violent dispositions, as it is a solemn truth that the very valuable and essential testimony that Friends have to bear in favor of a free ministry, can only be spread in the world by the spirit of love, and in this spirit the principles founded on the Gospel of Jesus Christ, can only be preached with any effect. After what has teen said respecting the unsound doctrines held by E. Hirks, it may be well to enquire, how are we to account for the circumstance of so many of the members of his quarterly neetiiig being so blind as not to discover the un- soundness of his principles? we have no hesitation in saying, that the leading rause is the want of a proper or suitable edu- cation; the writings of early Friends (except some Journals) are scarce and little read, all kinds of school learning, except reading, writing, and the first rules of arithmetic, are dis- couraged, as well as general History, and books written by persons who are not members. To read the Scriptures daily or at fixed hours, is declared to be mere formality, in many families they are very little read. It is therefore not so very 19 extraordinary as might at first appear, that a great proportion of the people so educated and so instructed, should submit to be led, and be so entirely influenced by such a man as Elias Hicks. If Friends in Philadelqhia should allow this man to visit families, and in this way spread his poisonous principles, divisions among them will assuredly be the consequence. The following was addressed by Isaac Pennington to a per- son holding similar doctrines to Elias Hicks, and may he now read as if addressed immediately to him — Gurney's Memoirs of Isaac Pennington, page 150. « shallow man, when wilt thou cease measuring God by the eye of thy reason; wilt thou say it must be thus and thus, because thou canst not set- how it can be otherwise, a proper query for the great reasoners of this age? O man, behold thy Saviour, know thy life, do wot despise eternity, because of its appearing, and acting through mortality. This is he that came to redeem thee, to be a propitiatory sacrifice for thee, and a pattern for thee, art thou able to measure God in any work of his through the Creation? Thou knowest thou art not. Then why dost thou measure him so confidently in his greatest work through his Christ: even the work of Redemption, and so apparently con- tradict him in it? Very deep and weighty was the answer of Christ to Philip when Philip said, « show us the Father and it sufficeth." "Hast thou not seen me, Philip?" said Christ; " How is it that thou sayest show me the Father? Ik that has seen me has seen the Father also" Are they not one nature, one wisdom, one pure eternal Being? Can the one be possibly seen and not the other, though they may be distinct in mani- festation, in the heart where they are received is it possible they should be divided one from the other, and separate? They that thus apprehend, plainly manifest that tiny have never received the knowledge of the Father and Son, but have only notions and apprehensions of man's wisdom concerning them. During George Withy's being in New York, many of those who have uniformly appeared as zealous supporters of Elias 20 Hicks showed themselves highly displeased with George, and addressed lo . im several anonymous letters, in which they charged him with preaching wrong doctrines, &c. A few days before he embarked for England, they (sixteen of them) had prepared a letter of several sheets to be signed by two or three of them in behalf of the whole, which they intended to deliver to him. They seemed to be in much trouble because the doctrine preached by him was so directly opposed to that held by Elias Hicks, and were exceedingly disturbed that George should have told Elias that his sentiments went to de- stroy the fundamental doctrines of the Christian religion. In order to support Elias they published one thousand copies of William Perm's " Sandy foundation Shaken," for the purpose, as they said, to show that the Unitarian doctrine held by Elias Hirks agreed with what was advanced by Penn — They were also urged to print Penn's Tract called " Innocency with her Open F :re," as they were told that that was afterwards pub- lished by him in order to prevent any wrong constructions that might take place in the minds of those who should read « Sandy foundation Shaken," but this of course they refused to print. FINIS. The above letter from Thomas Eddy of New York to a Friend in this city, and the accompanying remarks, are taken from the original in the hand-writing of the author. It was very desirable that a few friends should be furnished with a copy, in order t! ; a' the baneful and invidious effects intended to be produced by it might be counteracted, and it was thought best to have a few copies printed, being less liable to error than in transcribing, and its length would make this process tedious: b^d. in