E 540 J r^LiBRARY OF Congress.^ ^ Shelf— JA.G^.-Q..SJ ^ ^ i ijT^UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.rm^ m**^ 9-16' ^^'^ Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2010 witii funding from Tine Library of Congress littp://www.arcliive.org/details/speechofhontliaddOOstev / I V V SPEECH / HON. THADDEUS STEVENS OF PENNSYLVANIA, ON THE BILL TO EAISE ADDITIONAL SOLDIERS. ""} DELIVERED IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, FEB. 2, \U\ The House having under consideration the bill to raise additional soldiers for the service of the Government, Mr. STEVENS said : Mr. (Spbakkr: in the course ot this protracted debate, no gentleman has ex- pressed his opiuious with more candor than the gentleman from Maryland [Mr. May] who has just taken his seat. He avows his hostility to this bill because he is ppposed to the war. 1 do not expect any gentleman who will avow him- self opposed to the war to vote for this bill, because I am quite sure that the bill itself is a very efficient engine in carrying on this war. Hence the gentle- man from Maryland cannot be expected to vote for a bill whose beneficial ef- fects on the war are so evident. This bill has been opposed on various grounds ; by some true and loyal men, whose prudence, however, generally degenerates into timidity ; by otnerson that side of the House whom 1 am not at liberty to deem disloyal, but whose arguments and acts compel the belief that they are strong sympathizers with their " wayward sisters." it said that we have already so large an army that we have no need of more soldiers, and that this will cause a needless expense, it will require some three or four mouths to raise one hundred and fifty thousand. By that time, about June, the time of the two years men of iSew York, and of the nine months men, will expire. They will take from the Army, 1 think, at least three hua- dred thousand men. How are you to supply their place except by colored solr ■■ diersif It is said by our opponents that in the present temper ot the country you could not raise in the whole North fifty thousand men by voluntary enlist^ ment, and that to enforce conscription is out of the question. It may be so; and if it be so, it is useless, perhaps, to inquire what lias produced, this condi- tion of the public mind. iSo doubt the unhappy management of the war, and. , ■want of successful battles, have done something toward it. An unsuccessful. J war is always unpopular. Another great cause is the conduct of partisan demagogues. The Democratic leaders — and when 1 speak ot Democrats in these remarks, 1 beg to be under- stood as not including those true L>emocracts W|ho support the war and give their aid to the Administration — the Democratic leaders, 1 say, have been busy for the last year in denouncing the war and the Administration. They tell the people that this is an abolition war, a war for the negro, and not for the Union ; * that our southern brethren have been injured, and that we ought to lay down our arms and compromise. During the last electioneering campaign through- / out Pennsylvania, and i suppose the whole North, when the new volunteers were called for, Democratic leaders traveled everywhere and adviced that no Democrat .should volunteer, but stay at home and carry the election and re- gain power. The masses followed their advice; scarcely any Democrats joioedi the volunteers. Another thing that has cooled the ardor of the people is the rivalry among' the officeis, and the evident sympathy of a large portion of them with the rebels. Our armies have been in the hands of men who had no lieart in the cause, and who have demoralized the Army; and such demoralization hasbeea transferred to their friends at home. Hence, if we are to continue this war, we must call in the aid of Africans, slaves as well as freemen. But gentlemen speak boastfully of the power of the white men of the North, and that we have a million men in the field, and need no other aid. Sir, I have as high an opinion of the valor of northern men as any man can have ; but, instead of having a million, I do not believe we have now half that number of effective soldiers. Sickness, the sword, and absenteeism have taken half our troops ; and in four mouths one fourth more will be taken by the expiration of their time. "But suppose we could recruit our armies by white volunteers, i."? that any ar- gument against emplaying blacks? Why should our race be exposed to suffer- ing and disease, when the African might endure his equal share of it? Is it wise, is it humane, to send your kindred to battle and to death when you might put the colored man in the ranks, and let him bear a ])art of the conflict be- tween the rebels and his enfranchised slave ? Why should these bloody graves be filled with our relatives rather than with the property of traitors slain by their own masters, who, in their turn, would fall by the hands of the oppress- ed ? I have but little respect for the northern man who would save the rebels' property at the expense of the life of white men, We have heard repeated the usual slang of Democi-ats, so freely and falsely nsed by them to prejudice the minds of the people, that Republicans are trying to make the black man equal in all things to the white. The distinguished gentleman from Kentucky [Mr. Wickuffe] and his allies from Ohio have talked of Sambo's commanding white men. Sir, the bill contains no such provisions. Thev are to be employed only as soldiers or non-commissioned officers as is provided by the original bill and by the amendments as now proposed. I do not expect to live to see the day when, in this Christian land, merit shall coun- terbalance the crime of color. True, we propose to give them an equal chance to meet death on the battle-field. But even then, their great achievements, if equal to those of Dessalinet^, would give them no hope of honor. TRe only place where they can find equality is in the grave. There all God's children are equal.^ But it is said that our soldiers would object to their employment iu arms. It would be a strange taste that would prefer, themselves, to face the death- bearing heights of Fredericksburg, and to be buried in trenches at the foot of them, than to see it done by colored soldiers. 1 do not believe it. My col- league [Mr. Wright] said that he had heard some of our officers sa}- that if we thus used them they would lay down their arms and retire from the army. In God's name let them go. They are rebels in heart, and ought to be in the confederate army rather than in ours, to demoralize our soldiers. My colleague ought to report their names to the proper department, that they may be tried and inexorably shot. The gentleman from Kentucky objects to their employment, lest it should lead to the freedom of the blacks. He says that he fights only for the freedom of his ov/n white race. That sentiment is unworthy the high reputation of the friend and compeer of the great statesman of the West. That patriotism that is wholly absorbed by one's own country is narrow and selfish. That philan- thropy which embaaces' only* one's own race, and leaves the other numerous races of mankind to bondage and to misery, is cruel and detestable. IBut we are not fighting for the freedom of the slaves — we are fighting for the life of the nation ; and if, in the heat of such strife, the chains of the bondman are melted off, I thank God all the more.._ The distinguished, and, I would fain believe, the learned, gentleman from Kentucky exclaimed : " When before did any civilized country call on slaves to fight their battles? When did Sparta, or Athens, or Rome?" I must attribute this interrogative assertion to lack of memory. I ask, when did any civilized nation refuse to use their slaves in the defence of their country, when its exigencies required it? Never I All have used g them, and uniformly given their freedom for their services. Sparta and Athens on many occasions armed their Helots. They were always their armor- bearers. That I may not be suspected of speaking without authority, I will read a few passages from Roman history. In Arnold's Rome, it is said : "The other consul, Tiberius SemproniuB, was to have no other Eoman army than two legions of volunteer slaves." — Page 17.5. " A graduated ]iroperiy tax was imposed for the occasion. They were required to furnish a certain number of slaves as seamen ; to arm and equip them," &c. — Page 192. "The slaves, also, were again invited to enlist, ani two legions were composed out of them."— Page 192. "But there is no reason to doubt that Gracchus gained an important victory; and it was rendered famous by his giving liberty to .the volunteer slaves by whose valor it had mainly been won. Some of these behaved ill in the action, and were afraid they should be punished, rather than rewarded; but Gracchus first set them all free without distinction, and then sending for those who had misbehaved, made them severally swear that they would eat and drink standing so long as their military service should last, by way of penance for their fault. 8ueh a sentence, so different from the usual merciless severity of the Eoman discipline, added to the general joy of the army. The soldiers marched back to Beneventum in triumph, and the peop[e poured out to meet them, and entreated Gracchus that they might invite them all to a public entertainment. Tables were set out In the streets, and the freed slaves attracted every one's notice by their white caps, the well-known sign of their enfranchisement, and by the strange sight of those who, in the fnlfllment of their penance, ate standing, and waited on their worthier comrades The whole delighted the generous and i