> Reprinted from the Transactions of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, 1905. SOME PERSONAL RECOLLECTIONS OF THE CIVIL WAR/ By S. weir MITCHELL, M.D., LL.D., CORRESPONDING HONORARY MEMBER OF THE FRENCH ACADEMY OF MEDICINE. The story of the part played in the Civil War by our profession is nowhere told in a satisfactory manner. Histories of regiments, war biographies from private to general, the countless volumes of the rebellion record, relate the tale of battles lost or won, and of the military glory commemorated by monuments or rewarded by pensions. Except as to our technical story we alone are unre- corded. I know of no book which tells the personal life of a war sur- geon; what he did day by day on the field or in the hospital. I can imagine that such a book might be very interesting, and there are men in our own mitlst who could tell the story, and tell it well. It would have its romance, its pathos, its humor. Surgeon I/Ctterman left a volume giving an account of service with the Potomac army. It is a briefly told story of the difficul- ties of the army surgeon and what was required of him in the field. There are men here to-night of whose careers as brilliant and courageous war surgeons most of you know nothing. They are quiet gentlemen who no longer talk war, and it might be well for some of you to read with what respect and admiration the surgeon-in-chief of the Potomac army speaks of the competence of William Thomson and John II. Brinton. The other book on the history of the war is in the form of an official history of the medical department of the United States 1 Read April 5, 1905. N 2 MITCHELL: RECOLLECTIONS OF THE CIVIL WAR Army by Harvey E. Brown, and was published by the surgeon- general's office in 1873, but has been long out of print. The portion which deals with the rebellion is not more than thirty- five or forty pages. It has the dry, technical quality of official records and does no justice to a subject which should tempt some abler pen. When on April 12, 1861, we heard with shame and anger, such as few here can realize, that the flag had been fired on at Fort Sumter, the medical department of the army consisted of 30 surgeons and 83 assistants. Of these 24 resigned to take part in the rebellion and 3 were dismissed for disloyalty; 13 were natives of the South, but stood true to the flag. Two surgeon- generals, owing to death or resignation, succeeded one another rapidly, and finally, soon after the beginning of the war, it was found necessary, owing to age, to permit the surgeon-general, who had difficulty in fulfilling the duties of that office, to retire. He was an old army surgeon; had done excellent work, but was