Class, PC Book I HUNTINGTON FUND % -^ U A SCRAPS, REV. FRANCIS WRANGHAM, M.A. F.R.S. Quispiam fort esse (nee id immeritb) mirabitur me hac cetate hominem, gravioribus studiis deditum — nunc veluti repuerascentem, non modb veteres Mas nugas tanto intervallo rcpetere, veriim etiam veluti novo stultitice auctario cumulare. (Bez^e Poem. Praef.) LONDON: PRINTED BY C. BALDWIN, NEW BRIDGE-STREET. 1816. [Only 50 Copies printed.] 20544-9 'IS"' 1-2, -C -1-T ■J£DCC12£VJL- I-HOPWOOD-S- Drawn & Ungmved by MJIauofi&ri. from tile Original JSviile. fy J-A'ol^kais.JtA: CAROLINA . SYMMONS . ANNVM . AG-ENS XV FACTE . EXTMIA. JNGENIO . ADMIRABIEI S . 11ECVS . ET J>ELICIAE . SVOKVM JTKTATIS . ET . SVAYITATIS . SVAE . FARENTIBVS . PROPINQVIS . AMITIS . tBISTE .DESID-KIUVM . KELIQYIT. FEAHCIS WUANGEAM 9 Mjio EM,S* MILTON'S ' SECOND DEFENCE OF THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND;* IN ANSWER TO AN INFAMOUS ANONYMOUS WORK, ENTITLED 4 €t)e Crp of tfje llopal 2$looti to ^eatoert against tf)e tfiujltef) $amcit>e&' Nunc sub foederibus coeant felicibus una Libertas, et jus sacri inviolabile sceptri. Jtege sub Augustofas sit laudare Catonem. (George.) Here, Diadems, with Freedom blend your rays j Augustus throned endures a Cato's praise. [Only 50 copies printed separately.^ ADVERTISEMENT. XT would not have been difficult to prefix to the present Translation a Memoir of M. Sau- maise, which should have contained several par- ticulars bearing upon this controversy, extracted from volumes apparently never consulted by his biographers, and some which those biographers with the authorities in their hands seem stu- diously to have suppressed. A professed pane- gyrist like Vorstius, in his funeral Eloge, might perhaps be permitted (to borrow the language of his French Translator) passer ces choses-la peu agreables sous silence, et faire voiles d cote de ces ecueils ; but it can hardly be supposed, that a regular historian should have been guilty of the same omission. Yet Antoine Clement, in the Life prefixed to his 6 Claudii Salmasii, Viri Maximi, Epistolarum Liber Primus* (4to. Lugd. Bat. 1656), although he adverts at some length to the part which his hero was invited * The admirable portrait accompanying this Volume is followed by a not very admirable copy of verses from the pen B 2 IV ADVERTISEMENT. to take in the questions relative to Episcopacy, Presbytery, and Independency in the English Church,* cautiously avoids even naming his im- par congressus with the author of Paradise Lost : and Bayle is still more disingenuous. His only knowledge of Milton's marriage he appears to of C. Barlaeus. For the subjoined version of it I am, in a great degree,, indebted to the Rev. Dr. Symmons. In Effigiem Claudii Salmasii, Principis Eruditorum. Gallia quo nuper, jam sidere Leyda superbit ; Prcslucet magnis ortibus ista Pharos. Hcec sunt per specti, Lector, compendia mundi: Fronte sub hac Pallas prodigiosa latet. Partimur doctrinam alii ; hicsetota recondit; Immensosque habitat mens spatiosa lares. Scribiie, scriptores : cui pagina scripta Solini est, Judice me, scripti cir cuius orbis erit. Of Gallia once, of Leyden now the star, Art's glorious torch, this Pharos beams afar. Crowded within this brow, a world is seen; A giant Pallas sits enthroned within, learning is ours by scraps, his vast and whole ; Nor cramps the spacious dome his mighty soul. Solinus now — toil on, ye writing hosts ! The universe of learning singly boasts. * Melius tamen, says his Biographer, illud regimen (sc. Episcopale) et haud dubie cum summd uiilitaie processurum in Anglicanis Ecclesiis existimabat ; cum videret contra, subla- tis Episcopis omne genus Hceresium ei Schismatum pedetentim gliscere, et repentinam illam mutationem ac nimis violentam, neG institutam eo ordine utfas erat, aliquando causam fore misc- tandce per universam Britanniam calamitatis. ADVERTISEMENT. V have derived from Salmasius* fabulous account of it, though he had actually procured Latin extracts from Toland's Life of the English Poet for the use of his Dictionary ! What, it may well be asked, would he himself have said, if he had detected any other person in a similar offence? He proceeds to characterise him as one of those satirical wits who delight in stimu- lating, accumulating, and propagating calum- nious reports,* unsuccessfully indeed (he as- serts), in his c Iconoclastes ;' as c every body abroad remained convinced, that Charles L him- self wrote the book which bore his name ! ! ' With the view of supplying, to the best of * Bishop Newton's Apology for his method of writing con- troversy is somewhat more liberal. " With more candid and ingenuous disputants, he would have preferred civility and fair argument to wit and satire : ' to do so was my choice, and to have done thus was my choice/ is his own language. Besides, contests of every kind were then waged in a rougher and more barbarous manner." (Life, p. lxx.) Of Saumaise in particular, we are told by Sorbiere, it was impossible to dispute the opi- nions, in the smallest degree, without being called c a blockhead,' ' an idiot,' and perhaps ' a rascal/ " He has constructed no work (he adds) with lime and sand, by which posterity will be benefited. He cannot live without illustrious enemies, and without some quarrel upon his hands, and it does not suffice him to have disarmed his man, and obtained from him the usual satisfaction : he must trample him in the dirt, and disfigure him. His Latinity runs away with him. He is unwilling, that all the foul language he has learnt should be lost ; and he finds it more easy to produce from the stores of his memory the vituperative terms, which he has collected from ancient authors, than deli- cate raillery and sound argument from any other source." VI ADVERTISEMENT. my power, such misrepresentations or defects, I had made copious abstracts from Burman's valuable Sylloge, the Letters of Gudius and Sarravius, Vossius' Correspondence edited by Colomesius, &c. &c. &c, to say nothing of a host of minor writers. I had even submitted, in hours of greater leisure than I now possess, to the task of analysing the arguments employed upon the occasion; and hoped to have presented to the public a memoir not wholly unworthy of it's acceptance. But the combining and revising due to such a subject and such comba- tants, which would always have been arduous to me, I now, alas ! find to be impracticable ; and I must console myself with the idea, that enough is probably known, both of Salmasius* and his royal patroness, the extravagant Christina (whom Milton must be admitted, in his sublime apos- trophe, to have raised far above her desertf) to * See Dr. Symmons' Life of Milton, 2d Edit. pp. 350, 351, &c. &c. My obligations indeed to this work, and to it's author, are innumerable. The first will be copiously traced in the following pages : the latter I am happy to seize this, and every opportunity of acknowledging, however inadequately. To the Rev. Dr. Disney also, of the Hyde, I gladly return my thanks for many kind attentions connected with this little work. f Yet the great Conde, as well at. Milton, panegyrised her magnanimity. The feelings of these two encomiasts however, on the subject of the royalty which she renounced, may be pre- sumed to have been not quite in unison. But sometimes, we are told, Idem fit ex diversis : this seems to prove, that adversis may be substituted in the Thesis. Her conduct, after her abdi- cation and abjuration of Protestantism, must surely be regarded ADVERTISEMENT. Vli render any thing in the way of elucidation be- yond what is subjoined in the following notes, unnecessary. Even the notes are, generally, so little essential to the mere understanding of the text, that I have usually left the quotations, which they contain, untranslated. The Version itself, made on the suggestion of an eminent Bookseller many years ago, as circumstances intercepted it's appearance at the time, was thrown aside with numerous other still more imperfect undertakings, to perish. -A valued friend, by his intercession, drew it from the devoted heap. It communicates re- spectability of size at least to the volume, to which it is prefixed : and if by contributing to revive, or to extend, a conviction of the integrity, magnanimity, consistency, and erudi- tion of Milton — for of the erroneousness of several of his opinions is, here, no question — it should polish or replace one leaf of his laurel crown, which Malignity has breathed upon or Time has broken off, I shall be abundantly satisfied. Such as it is, I inscribe it, with the most un- feigned respect, to THE RIGHT HON. EARL SPENCER. as indefensible. Her strange caprices of dress and association might be forgiven ; but the murther of Monaldeschi must close the mouth of her defenders. Dr. Symmons correctly confines his vindication to the period when she praised Milton, and Mil- ton praised her ! 1 MILTON'S SECOND DEFENCE, &c A HAT first and greatest of human duties, constant gratitude to God, with a faithful remembrance, and (whenever we have been blessed beyond our hopes and expectations) an express and devout acknowledgement of his favours, I feel now strongly incumbent upon me, in the very outset of my work, on three several accounts. First, because I am fallen upon those days, in which the eminent virtues and unprecedented magnanimity and persever- ance of my fellow-citizens , after due invocation of the Deity and under his most obvious gui- dance, by a series of unparallelled actions and exertions have rescued the state from grievous tyranny and religion from a most ignominious slavery : Next, because when many suddenly sprung up with low-born malice to criminate their great achievements, and one more particu- larly (elated with a pedant's pride, and puffed up by the adulations of his followers) in an 10 milton's second defence. infamous book levelled against me had nefa- riously undertaken the vindication of all tyrants, I was specially and unanimously selected by the redeemers of my country, as not unequal to an adversary of such renown or a subject of such importance, to defend in public the cause of the people of England, and if ever it might so be asserted, of Liberty herself: and Lastly, because in a matter of so much difficulty and such anxious expectation, I neither disappointed the hope, shall I call it ? or the opinion of my countrymen, nor failed to convince great num- bers of foreign statesmen and scholars ; having at the same time so shattered my presumptuous adversary in the conflict, by humbling his pride and ruining his character, as to prevent him for the three years during which he survived his defeat, notwithstanding all his indignant menaces, from again molesting me otherwise than by purchasing the feeble assistance of some contemptible allies, and suborning (as will shortly appear) a few poor fulsome panegyrists to repair, if possible, his recent and unforeseen disgrace. These important circumstances then, considered as proofs of the divine goodness, advancing a powerful claim to my gratitude, and supplying also a most favourable auspice for the commencement of my present under- taking, I now commemorate with the profound- est veneration. Who indeed is there, that does not look upon MILTON'S SECOND DEFENCE, 21 his country's glories as his own ? And what can be more glorious to any country, than the resto- ration of freedom in both it's civil and it's religious concerns ? In both these respects, what people or what state has evinced more fortitude, or experienced better fortune, than this ? For fortitude does not wholly exert itself in battle, but equally exhibits it's energy and it's intrepidity in opposition to every species of fear. The Greeks, those primary objects of our respect, and the Romans, when they were about to expel a tyrant, displayed no other virtue than a zeal for liberty, with a weapon to wield and an arm to strike. All that was farther necessary they easily accomplished, with happy omens, amidst the praises and gratulations of mankind. Neither did they seem so much to rush into the danger of doubtful contest, as to hurry forward to the fair and honourable struggle of virtue, to rewards and crowns and the assured hope of immortality. Tyranny was not, then, a hal- lowed thing: tyrants had not, as the sudden self-created viceroys and vicars of Christ, from hopelessness of the affection, entrenched them- selves behind the blind superstition, of the populace : the lower orders had not, under the stupefying influence of the priesthood, sunk into a state of barbarism darker even than that, in 'which the idiots of India now grovel. For these only worship as deities a crew of perni- cious demons, whom they cannot get rid of; 12 milton's second defence* those on the contrary, to incapacitate themselves for the expulsion of tyrants, converted them into arrogant divinities against themselves, and consecrated the pests of mankind to their own destruction. With all those legions of inveterate opinions, superstitions, abuses, and terrors — objects of deeper dismay to others, than an actual enemy — the people of England had to contend : and all those through their better instruction, aided doubtless by suggestions from above, they subdued ; with such a confidence in their cause, and so high a degree of valour and of virtue, that though a numerous population, they can no longer be considered from their towering and elevated qualities as c a lower order;' and Bri- tain herself, which has long been accounted a land prolific of tyrants, has henceforth a title to be proclaimed by posterity more prolific of patriots — patriots, not goaded by a contempt or an infraction of the laws to ungoverned licen- tiousness, not inflamed by mock images of virtue and of glory, or allured through a ridiculous imitation of the ancients by the empty name of liberty ; but guided along the right and only path to true freedom by innocence of life and purity of morals, and armed in the just and necessary defence of religion and the laws. Relying then uniformly on the assistance of God, they repelled servitude with the most justifiable war : but though I claim no share of milton's second defence. 13 their peculiar praise, I can easily defend myself from the charge (should any such be brought against me) of indolence, or of timidity. For I did not so decline the toils and dangers of war, as not in another way, with much more efficacy and with not less danger to myself, to assist my countrymen, and exhibit a mind neither shrinking from adverse fortune, nor actuated by any improper fear of calumny or of death. Eminently devoted as I had been from my childhood to the more liberal studies, and always stronger in my intellect than in my body, I avoided the labours of the camp, in which any robust private might easily have surpassed me, and betook myself to those weapons which I could wield with superior effect : that so I might bring my better and more valuable faculties, if indeed they were of any value, and not my worse, as my greatest possible contribution to the assistance of my country and this her most honourable cause. Concluding therefore within myself that, if God selected them to achieve exploits so glo- rious, he had doubtless selected others as writers properly to record and embellish those achievements, and to protect by argument (the bulwark, properly and peculiarly belonging to man) that truth, which had already been pro- tected by arms ; though I profoundly admire those heroes of the field, I am so far from com- plaining of my own province, that I felicitate 14 MILTON S SECOND DEFENCE. myself upon it, and again fervently thank the heavenly Giver of all good gifts, that it is such as much rather to be an object of envy to others, than of regret to myself. In regard to myself, however, I would not willingly institute any comparison with the humblest of my species, nor utter a single syllable, that should wear the appearance of presumption : but whenever I look to my most noble and illustrious cause, and to the exalted function of defending the defenders of my country imposed upon me by their own free suffrages and judgements, I confess I can hardly restrain myself from adven- turously soaring beyond the natural simplicity of an exordium, and seeking a more dignified commencement ; since I as far exceed in gran- deur and strength of subject all the celebrated orators of antiquity, as I yield to them in my power of doing justice to it, with respect both to my feelings and to my expressions — confined too, as I necessarily am, to a foreign language, in which I often fall beneath my own conceptions. This subject has indeed excited such expec- tation, and is become a matter of so much pub- licity, that I imagine myself not as in the Forum or on the Rostra, surrounded by the single "people of Rome or of Athens ; but as if I had already in my former Defence addressed, and were now again addressing, almost the whole of Europe met together to listen and to decide ; milton's second defence.. 15 the collective assemblies of every thing respect- able among men, and cities, and nations. I now seem, in setting out upon my journey, to look down from my elevation over the wide- spread regions of the Continent upon innumer- able crowds, their faces totally unknown to me, their feelings in perfect unison with mine. Here the manly and high-minded German, there the Frank with his animated and liberal impetuosity worthy of his name, here the meditative wis- dom of the Spaniard, there the steady self- possessing magnanimity of the Italian meets my eyes. Every free bosom, every ingenuous and noble principle, whether prudentially concealed or openly avowed, gives me it's silent or it's public suffrage ; some attending and applauding my enterprise, and some reluctantly surrender- ing themselves to the power of truth. So accompanied, I appear as if I were bringing back Liberty, after her long long expulsion and exile, to every realm between the pillars of Her- cules and the extremities of Bacchus' eastern conquests ; and, like Triptolemus of old, com- municating universally from my own state to others of all denominations a produce, much more valuable however than that of Ceres, the restoration of civil freedom and independence. Nor do I come forward this second time either wholly unknown, or I hope wholly unac- ceptable : as I am He who before, upon the first application of the English leaders, encountered 1 16 milton's second defence. in single combat the hardy champion of tyrants, the contumelious assailant of our patriotic hosts — till then, in the general opinion as well as in his- own, accounted invincible ; and with my feathered arrow * striking his scurrilous throat, defeated him even at his own weapons ; and, if I may be permitted without depreciation to trust the sentiments and decisions of numbers of intelligent and impartial readers, bore off a complete victory.t As a proof that this is no false or exaggerated account, I may state what appears perfectly providential, that when on the honourable invitation of Christina, t that emi- * Adacto convitiantis injugulum hoc stilo. The stilus, by it's ibnn, was adapted to do execution in more ways than one : and to this P. Sarpi alluded, when he said, after having narrowly escaped assassination, "Ben riconosco lo stilo delta Romana ewria" He had, previously, been attacked with much violence by the writers of that church. From it's more bloody, though in many instances less malignant, application is derived the modern word, stiletto. An English translator, however, in order to preserve the pun, is obliged to make a slight change in the figure. + Opima spolia, as it appears from Livy (iv. 20.) are those, quce dux duci detrahit* If we were obliged to interpret the phrase rigidly in this acceptation, we might perhaps justify Milton by referring to Saumaise's common title of * Princeps Erudiiionis^ to which likewise he probably thought he had himself as just a claim. But Varro will save his modesty, by his Si manipularis miles detraxerit, dummodo duci hostium. (Fest.) % Upon this most extraordinary woman, Warton in his edition of Milton's Minor Poems (Ed. 2d. 1791.) has two long potes, pp. 483 — 488. It does not appear, however, that she milton's second defence* i? irent patroness of every valuable art and every learned man, this Monsieur or Madame Saumaise (for by whether name he ought to be called, the notorious despotism of the lady* has rendered dismissed Saumaise from her court with contempt ; if we may trust her own declarations, in her letter to his widow, that she had for him " des sentimens de iendresse aussi veritables qa'elle les awreit pu avoir pour un pere" that he was " celni de tous les hommes qui meritoit le mieux d'etre immortel," and that with regard to his son " elle voidoit contribuer, aidant qu'il dc- pendroit d'elle, a le rendre dignejils dhin si grand pere:" un- less we allow, with Warton, that from her levity, or hypocrisy, or caprice " she might have acted inconsistently in some parts of this "business." She herself says, in the same letter, that she had incurred " des soupgons d'etre mediocrement inter essee a la gloire de ce grand homme." That she did something more at least than merely " commend the wit and stile" of Milton's performance, of which Vossius has informed us, is probable from her being introduced twice more in this Defensio Secun&a, and in one of those passages made the subject of an animated apostrophe. It was no part of our authors character to recom- pense an empty compliment by the sacrifice of substantial truth. * Madame Saumaise, it appears from several letters in the Sarravian collection, was far from being a lamb in disposition. In Epist. ci, cxxiii, she is denominated c Xanthippe ; ' in cxxxi, £t &c. In the note, p. 23, an instance occurs of the kind alluded to. * Saumaise, it appears both from this passage, and from one immediately following — Citm vester ille Claudius de Jure Regio, materia save gratiosissimd, sine nomine tamen orsus esset scribere — as well as from the title of Milton's reply, ' Pro Populo Anglicano Defensio contra Claudii Anonymi, alias Salmasii, &c.,' and from some parts of his preface to it, issued his first publication without a name. This double-named Ano- nymous, as solecistical, is treated by Saumaise in his ■ Re- sjponsio' with great severity : where however he inconsistently exonerates our author of part of the Defence, insinuating that it was written d, ludimagistro quodam Gallo de trivio (Could he here blunderingly mean Gill, who died in 1642 ?) and clum- sily retaliates the alias by a Johahnis Asini, alias Multonis (nam * multo 9 vervex est etiam Anglis) which he immediately changes into Tygridis alias Leopardi, and Lupi alias Molossi ; as the first, he says, are too meek a pair of animals for the parallel. milton's second defence. 23 The followers and friends of kings are not ashamed of their principals. How then can these be such ? They bestow no presents, but rather receive them : they contribute nothing, not even their names, to the royal cause. What then ! They give words ; * and yet even these they have not the generosity to give for nothing, or the spirit to sanction by the addition of their signatures. Whereas I, Messieurs Les Anonymes (for I must address you by a foreign name, as you do not allow me to do it in plain English) though your great Saumaise first published upon his most courtly subject, the Royal Prerogative, without his name, and left me at full liberty to follow his example ; I was so far from being ashamed of myself or of my cause, that I should have deemed it infamous to undertake a work of such importance without an open ac- knowledgement of myself. What I then openly acknowledge, writing in a republic against kings, why do you, writing in the dominions or under the patronage of kings against a republic, studiously conceal ? Why do you tremble, in a place of safety ? Why shrink, as in the night, amidst full day-light; and by your invidious and suspicious cowardice throw a slur upon the high power and favour, by which you are pro- •r * Dant verba, every school-boy knows, is an equivoque, which admits of no parallel version into English, so as to imply f deception* in terms compatible with the gratis dare? which follows. 14 miltgn's second defence. tected ? Do you doubt, whether or not they are able to protect you ? So masked and disguised, truly, you resemble rather a band of thieves collected to " roD the exchequer," than a cohort of warriors marshalled to defend the rights of kings. I publicly state, what I am ; # and the power, which I now withhold from kings, I would still in any legitimate kingdom continue rigorously to withhold from them : neither could any monarch condemn me as a criminal, without first condemning himself as a tyrant. In inveighing indeed against tyrants, how do i injure kings, whom i place at the far- THEST distance from tyrants ? Good men and bad do not, in fact, more widely differ. Whence it follows, that a tyrant is not only not a king, but a character universally most hostile to a king ; and, if we refer to the annals of anti- quity, we shall find that more kings have been dethroned and destroyed by tyrants, than by the people. To affirm, then, that tyrants ought to be cut off is to affirm, not that kings, but that their worst and deadliest enemies ought to be cut off. What you, on the other hand, con- * " I am a plain man, and on my lirst appearance in this way I told my name, and who I belonged to." (Preface to the « Defence of the Divine Legation.') Such was Warburton's principle. The practice of his followers appears, occasionally, to have been somewhat less honest. See, in Parr's Dedication of i Two Tracts of a Warburtonian* to Bishop Hurd, his com- ment upon these " deeds without a name/' p. 158. MTLTON S SECOND DEFENCE. 25 tend for as the prerogative of kings, that their will should be law, is not a prerogative, but a mischievous and criminal and ruinous privilege. By this envenomed, not salutary present, pro- claiming them to be above all violence and peril, you are yourselves the authors of their destruction ; and establish their identity with tyrants, by giving to both an identity of what you call ' rights/ For, if a king does not avail himself of this his prerogative (which he will never do, so long as he is a king, and not a tyrant) that is to be set down to him not as a king, but as a man. And what more absurd than a right, which a king cannot exercise but by renouncing his humanity ; and which con- strains him to prove himself a man, only by ceasing to be a king ! What can be urged, more contumelious to royalty than this ? The advo- cate of such a doctrine must himself be the vilest and most unjust of mortals : and how can he be more vile, than by becoming the very creature, which he would make others? If there- fore, as one of the ancient sects arrogantly pro- nounced, " every good man be a king;"* it * Nay more, if we may trust Horace, rex denique reguml (Ep. I. i. 107,) or ' Cesar's Caesar.' Horace's Sapiens, in this passage, is the bonus vir et fortis of Cicero, qui miser esse non potest. (Paradox, ii.) To this ' wise man of the porch/ the * budge doctors of the Stoic fur* in the fifth and sixth Para* doxes appropriate all genuine freedom and real opulence 1 26 milton's second defence, equally follows that every bad man, to the ex- tent of his capacity, is a tyrant. For, not to puff him up by the denomination, a tyrant is a mean, not a lofty thing ; mean in proportion to his magnitude, and servile in proportion to his power. Others are voluntary slaves to their own vices alone : whereas a tyrant is a slave not only to his own, but even (often against his •will) to those of an importunate host of minis- ters and satellites; compelled to devolve his despotism on his infamous minions, and to live, the lowest of slaves, in a state of servitude to his own dependents. Rightly, then, may this name be bestowed upon the humblest retainer of tyrants, for instance, upon this crier now in question ; whose deep-mouthed bawling in their behalf will be sufficiently accounted for by what I have already stated, and am farther about to state, as also why he sculks without a name. For he has either, like Saumaise, basely sold this cry of his to the royal blood for a paltry sum of money, or feels himself completely ashamed of his infamous doctrines, or is con- scious of an abandoned and profligate life ; in any of which cases we cannot be surprised, that he should be anxious to remain undetected : or perhaps he wishes to reserve to himself the privi- lege of deserting kings, if he scent greater profit in any other quarter, and of offering his services to some future republic — even so, not without the MILTON S SECOND DEFENCE. 27 precedent of his vaunted Saumaise, who dazzled by the glitter of gold # went over in his old age from the right discipline of the church to that of bishops, from the popular party to that of kings. You are not hidden, therefore, you yelping cottage-cur : your lurking-corner will not avail you : you shall be dragged out, trust me, and all your petty artifices exposed :t you shall be constrained, in fine, to allow for the rest of your life, either that I am not blind, or at least that I have eyes for you. Who then, and what sort of a creature is this fellow ; and by what hopes, bribes, and tempta- tions he has been induced to come forward in the royal cause — it is a loose watering-place kind of story ^ — I will now state to you. * Affulgente lucro. This idea had previously occurred in the Si dolosi spes refulserit nummi borrowed from Persius' Pro- logue, v. 12, in our author's epigram, * In Salmasii Hun- dredam' (Pro Pop: Anglic. Def. viii.) of which some account^ with a translation, is given in a subsequent note. f The Plutonis galea of the original was fabricated by the Cyclops, during the war of the Gods and the Titans, for the Monarch of the shades, and like Gyges ' ring had the faculty of rendering it's wearer invisible. (Apollod. I. ii. 1.) It was lent to Perseus, to aid him in his attack upon the Gorgon s. (Id. ib. II. iv. 2.) Dr. Symmons, in the Preface to the second Edition of his ( Life of Milton,' p. xiii. traces it, with classical felicity of allusion, into the possession of modern Reviewers. % Milesia aut Baiana fabula. The Milesiacs or Milesian Fables had their origin in Miletus, a luxurious town of Ionia. Aristides was the most celebrated author of these licentious fictions. Plutarch, in his Life of Crassus, calls them }V tVTVfclM £l 3C0H Xiu* ivxpowrov, ac denique — zyyifaxov to tto\$ 9 ctyy iXixwripot m» &XV6HCV. In this panegyric, he attacks Grotius for having called Calvin, p. 83, Serveti Exustor, and for disgracefully lending himself to the views of the Romish court. The Letter to Farellus, in which (according to Grotius) Calvin boasted effecturum sese, si quid sua valeret auctoritas, ne Servetus vivus abiret, More contends was never produced ; and the invidious insinuation, about the Genevese Reformer's cook, he repels by referring to the pallidulum os of his portrait ; hoc satis faciei , ut studiosissimum sed non cupediarum, nee nisi librorum hel* luonem intelligat : non pinguem, non adipejartum, quad mo* milton's second defence. 29 half Scot (that the whole infamy of the man may not press too heavily upon a single race, or nation) a worthless scoundrel, on the accumu- lated testimony not only of indifferent persons, but what is much more conclusive, of his own friends, whom he has entirely alienated by his villainies, a faithless lying ungrateful scurrilous wretch, the constant calumniator both of men and women, to whose chastity as well as cha- racter he is a decided enemy. This fellow first became known — for I will pass over the ob- scurity of his early life — as a teacher of Greek at Geneva : yet, though he had often explained his own name* in that language to his pupils, nachis attribui solet ut in adagium abierit, non rubricato hi pustulas vultu, non gemmanti et quasi fruticanti naso, sed qualem Calvinum oportuit inveniet. It is admitted however, elsewhere, that he might casually have so expressed himself; and I believe it is not doubted, that he was the cause of his former friend's being thrown into a dungeon, and wished for his con- demnation, though he might not subsequently have objected to a mitigation of his punishment. After the censure, which More passes upon Grotius' * Annotations on the Scriptures,' it is not a little curious that twenty years afterward he should pilfer from them so copiously. He closes his work of flattery with the wretched and imperfect anagram of Respublica Gene- vensis, " Gens sub ccelis vere pia." There is a good note upon him in Warton, ib. 486. Another Du Moulin was the author of a rare Calvinistic Tract, entitled ' Moral Reflexions upon the Number of the Elect, proving plainly from Scripture-Evidence, &c. that not One in a Hundred Thousand (nay, probably, not One in a Million) from Adam down to our time, shall be saved V 1 680. * M^pe^ fatuus. On the word {tfopa&n, Matt. v. 13. B. P, SO milton's second defence. he could not unlearn the vicious folly which it implies ; but, in spite of his consciousness of so many crimes hitherto perhaps undiscovered, he had the frantic ambition to offer himself a can- didate for ordination, and to pollute with his infamous morals the Christian church. He was quickly, however, exposed to the censure of the presbytery as an amorous coxcomb, branded with many vicious practices and many hete- rodox opinions, which though he meanly dis- Tingstadius observes, correcting Rosenmiiller's remark upon the passage, that " anciently savour was a metaphor of wisdom and virtue, and insipidity of folly aud vice;" for which he refers to Job vi. 6. and Prov. xi. 22., the usage of the Arabian poets, and the etymology of the Romans, who cc derived sapi- entia from sapor, and by insipidus and insulsus described a foolish and vicious man/' Schleusner himself does not escape his censure (See his f Mise. Philol. Remarks on the Swedish Ver- sion of St. Matthew,' Upsal.) So the Schol. on Eurip. Androm. 675. explains ywaiKu ^/&'p«iv»c-«y by 5repsysToi of women disposed jc©r,Tcci vrpwwt, or c beds of all various herbs for ever green/ like the c nuptial bed of espoused Eve' (P. L. iv» 710.) The A^avi^ Kyzti, consecrated to Venus on account of her handsome paramour, are explained by Erasmus, in his ' Adages,' as referring to res levicidcs parumque frugiferce, et ad brevem prcBseniemque modb fructiim idonecs. Of the passage which follows, Jicui morum inserere^ complures inde sycomoros quam citissime enasci, &c. we cannot regret the impossibility of pre- senting an adequate version to the English reader. Our term e bed,' however, is proportionally more expressive than the original areolce. i In this stoiy, Milton seems to have made some slight mis- take, More, whose learning procured him the offer of several milton's second defence. S3 the utmost difficulty procured some cold formal * Letters Testimonial/ as they are called, from that place — on condition of his immediate de- parture 5 several indeed thinking it very wrong, that the church should bear testimony in favour of such a profligate, but the majority deeming any thing rather to be borne than the profligate himself. On his arrival in Holland, he waited upon Saumaise, and there cast a lustful eye upon Pontia, his wife's maid ; for the gentleman is always partial to servant-girls. Thencefor- ward, he began assiduously to cultivate Sau- maise, and as often as occasion served, Pontia too. Whether indeed Saumaise, won by the convenience and fulsomeness of the fellow, or More thinking that he should have better and more frequent opportunities of seeing Pontia, first introduced mention of Milton's * Reply,' literary appointments, had obtained Letters Testimonial with some other view, six or seven years previously to his final departure from Geneva ; and upon that occasion being obliged to apply for Letters Recommendatory, by going round to indi- viduals and importuning them for their signatures, he got (not, as in the former case, Jrigidulas but) frigidissimas litems, granted chiefly for the credit of his profession and the removal of himself. These however, under the pretext of not having been able to procure a copy, he suppressed. See the ( Pro Se Defensio,' where Milton takes an opportunity, in his copious and animated account of this affair, of estimating the weight of Testimonials in general, and of paying a fine compliment to the small republic of Geneva. He there, likewise, renews the alle- gation, which immediately follows : Ancillis, ut videtur, quo~ canque vadis, nullum abs te refugium est. D 54 milton's second defence. I am not competent to decide. However that be, More undertakes Saumaise's defence, and Saumaise promises More a divinity-chair in that city,* by his interest, in return : More likewise promising himself the indulgence of carrying oa a sly intrigue with Pontia into the bargain. Under the pretence of consulting his principal upon this subject, he frequents his house day and night. And now, as Pyramus was for- merly transformed into a mulberry-tree, behold our mulberry-tree t suddenly transformed into a Pyramus, transplanted from Geneva to Baby- * Leyden. f Lat. Morus. This, as it might be expected, is not anew pun. At Losely, the seat of the Mores (near Godalmin, in Surrey) we learn from Manning's f History and Antiquities of that County,' p. 98, were sundry notable devices: and among the rest, " in the corner of the great withdrawing- room, is inserted a Mulberry-tree, on the side of which is this inscription, Morus tarde moriens ; on the other, Morum cito moriturum" meaning respectively, f The tree perennial,' * Perishing the fruit.' From the Moria Encomium of Eras- mus, indeed, to the Honor es Mutant Mores of Jo Miller, the word is fertile in witticisms. In Vossius* Letters to Hein- sius, this unlucky name appears under the alias of iEthiops (Maurus.) In the Genevensis in Babylonium t which follows, we find an antithesis between the churches of Geneva and Rome, which latter city has been deemed by most commentators the anti-type of the Babylon in the Apocalypse; a fortunate cir- cumstance, as Milton would esteem it, with reference to the scene of Pyramus' story. We may be permitted indeed to wonder, that no allusion is made to the fornication and har- lotry of that city, Rev. xvii. 2, 5, &c. milton's second defence. 35 Ion ; but luckier, though less deserving than that youth, he can converse with his Pontia as he pleases under the same roof: no need to* seek a cranny in the wall. He promises her marriage, under that engagement he debauches her, and thus at once (I shudder to state it, but it must be stated) he violates the purity of his profession, and the rites of hospitality. From this intercourse sprung a monstrous and unna- tural compound birth. Both the male and the female conceived ; Pontia a little Morell, des- tined long afterward to exercise the patience of Saumaise, the Plinian exercise-writer ; r* and More an empty wind-egg, whence issued this flatulent • Cry of the Royal Blood? at first indeed holding out the prospect of an agree- able treat to our hungry royalists in Belgium, but proving to their regret, upon breaking the shell, addle and rotten. For More swelling with his conception, and fancying that he had curried favour with all the Orange-faction, greedily swallowed in anticipation whole pro- * Saumaise's celebrated Work, entitled c Exercitatiortes Pli- niance in Cai, Jul. Solin. Poly hist.' was first published at Paris in 1629. The subject of this commentary, a miserable compilation of historical and geographical remarks on different countries, abounds with extracts from Pliny the Naturalist to «uch a degree, as to have procured for it's author the name- of ' Plinii Simla' The term f conception,' occurring below, Milton would pro- bably have used, if he had written in English, instead- of th« less equivocal word fcetu. © 2 56 milton's second defence. fessorships; and had wickedly abandoned his Pontia, now pregnant, as a servant and a beggar. Upon this she applied to the synod and the magistracy, with complaints of his neglect and breach of faith. Thus the story got abroad, and was long a subject of joke and ridicule at almost every table and in every party. Whence some one, no bungler in epigram, threw off the following distich : < Pontia's with child by More — but why this fuss? She is well wzoral'd, and morigerous.' * * The whole affair of this English Abigail, Pontia, or (as More himself, in his Reply, taught Milton more correctly to call her) Bontia — see his f Pro Se Defensio * — after every deduc* tion for the virulence of our author's invective, appears to have been a most disgraceful piece of business. It is not perhaps worth the more ample investigation, which Milton in his sub- sequent Rejoinder has bestowed upon it, orWarton's very prolix note, pp. 485 — 487. It's best result was the present Audoenie epigram, which M. Colomies emphatically calls un sanglant distique, but of which the poignancy (depending on a verbal conceit) is with difficulty transferable to our language. My attempt in the text, aiming to be literal, is I fear obscure ; to Dr. Symmons the reader will be indebted for a superior version : f Though Pontia's big, cease, dames, to call her w— e : You bear a spotless name, buteshe bears — More/ (p. 411, Note*.) Madame Saumaise has not wholly escaped the suspicion of having, like Juno, been actuated by a sense of the spreta injuria Jbrmce in the prosecution, which she instituted against More upon the occasion. See Thurloe's f State- Papers,' ii §94., where mention is made also of Ulack the printer, in- MILTON S SECOND DEFENCE, 3? Poor Pontia alone found it no joke : but all her complaints proved ineffectual. The Cry of the troduced below. — " De JEthiope (More) et Angld" says Is, Vossius to Nic. Heinsius,in a letter dated ' Amst. 1652/ lepida sunt et f estiva, quce reponis ; sed nunc negant ea vera esse, et sparsa esse ab malevolis quibusdam. Sane constat mihi Anglam istam omnes JEihiopi reddidisse amatorias suas. Liter ipsum et Salmasium lis Jbrsan orietur (qucenam, enim, inter tales j)ossit esse diuturna concordia ?) propter librum quendam hie excusam, cui titulus * Clamor Sanguinis Regii in Ccelum.* Scriptus ille videtur a quodam anonymo Anglo, transmissus verb Salmasio, divulgatus verb ad JEthiope. Propter sexaginta exemplaria, quce promisit typographus, inter ipsos est con- tentio. JEthiops ea sibi vult vindicare, decrevitque sex exem- plaria inscribere Regince nostrce, totidem verb Regi Anglice ; alia item sex Gallice Regi, &c. &c. Vossius seems to have known the secret History of this cele- brated Tract very correctly ; as the * anonymous Author/ Du Moulin, in his ? Reply to a Person of Honour,' &c. 4to. Lond. 1675, actually owns the work; as well as in the Prefatory Epistle, intended to accompany his furious Iambics against Milton in their second edition with the ( Regii San- guinis Clamor.* His illiberal sneers at Milton's blindness, and his mean exultation at beholding another smarting in his stead, display at once as Dr. Symmons has observed, the most selfish cowardice, and the most egregious want of principle. And yet his loyalty raised him, in those times, to a high station in our church ! Compared with him, More was, indeed, a liberal and honourable antagonist. From the 'Pro Se Defensio 9 how- ever of Milton it appears, that the latter wrote the Prefatory Epistle to Charles II., and even subscribed his name to it in many of the copies instead of that of A. Ulack. More afterward prosecuted the young woman, and her master Salmasius with his whole family. His resentment, fully pro- portionate to his preceding intimacy, Jed him meanly to disclose $$ milton's second defence. Royal Blood easily drowned those of a weak ruined girl, complaining of her seduction. Sau- maise too, shocked at the injury and disgrace inflicted upon himself and his whole family, finding himself duped by his dear friend and encomiast and a second time laid at the mercy of his enemy, and perhaps likewise considering the event as a misfortune super-added to what he had already incurred in the royal cause, sunk shortly afterward into the grave. But I antici- numerous little incidents relative to his old patron and his Xanthippe during an occasional dinner (perhaps given for the purpose) to Saumaise's bitter enemy , Isaac Vossius. A dis- gusting recital of one of them is contained in a subsequent Letter from Heinsius dated f Venice, 1653;' where the whipping referred to by Warton in his Note, the crime, and the confede- rate {Hebe Caledonia) are introduced in minute detail. See also a Letter from Vossius to Heinsius, stating Saumaise's wish that ' More would marry his wife's light-charactered attendant/ with More's sturdy refusal, and a consequent squab- ble between him and his Dulcinea, Burm. Syll. iii. 651. More had not scrupled to represent the lady as unfaithful to her hus- band's bed ; and as Saumaise had triumphantly disarmed of all it's virulence the name e Alastor * bestowed upon him, by dis- covering that it had somewhere been given to Jupiter, they quaintly agree to bestow upon him the latter title, with itV Lybian adjunct of ' Amnion.' In the legal investigation of the quarrel, it seems to have been the great object of Madame Saumaise and her advocates, to establish by testimony the incontinence of More; and their good fortune to find, as they supposed, proof unius alteriusve ancillce quibus vim inferre voluerit. It is amusing to read these elassical scurrilities of the animce calestes of literature. milton's second defence. 39 pate. Previously to his death, like Salmacis of old (for their stones, as well as their names,* have a strong resemblance) unconscious that he had clasped in his arms an hermaphrodite com- petent to the functions of both sexes, and not knowing what More had begotten in his house, Saumaise fondles what he brought forth by the press — I mean the volume, in which he finds himself so often denominated c the Great,' and peruses with so much complacency t compli- * Here the pun upon the names is more obvious in the original, Salmasius and Salmacis. t This instance of vanity was too gross, to be lightly dis- missed : it is again brought forward in a subsequent page. And yet Saumaise, in a letter to J, F. Gronovius (dated, it is true, fifteen years before, in 1637) says, u Suffercti sufflatique quan- tum volent emendicatis laudibus ambulent, dum ego vix Jerre queo — non dico, meritas, quid enim mereor? sed ne modicas quidem et h benevolentibus ultro tributas ;" and goes on to request his friend to abstain from compliments, that they may deal with one another after the old Roman fashion, " et hujus- modi ineptias ex animo nostro primum, deinde ex scriptis dele- amus!" (Salm. Epist. lxxvii.) But Colomesius, in his ( Recueil de Particularity , 9 has preserved an anecdote (quoted, with too many others of a similar kind by the amusing Menckenius, in his f De Charla- tanerid Eruditorum,' p. 52, n.) which deposes strongly against the sincerity of this deprecatory language : ( Messieurs Gaul- min 9 Saumaise , et Maussac se rencontrans un jour a la Bib- lioiheque Royale, le premier dit aux deux autres ; " Je pense que nous pourrions bien tous trots tenir tite a tous les Savans de V Europe? A quoi M. de Saumaise repondit ; " Joignez a tout ce quHl y a de Savans au monde, et vous et M. de Maus- sac, je vous tiendrai tite tout seul" (Opuscul., Ultraj. 1669, P- 98.) 40 milton's second defence. merits, by the world pronounced ridiculous and absurd. He, therefore, instantly sets out to the printer's ; and, in his fruitless effort to preserve the fame that has long been slipping through his ringers, descends to play the humble mid- wife's part in obstetricating to those praises, or rather those fulsome adulations, for which he miserably cringes to such sycophants as this. For this labour, one Ulack seemed a most com- modious accomplice. Him he easily persuades, not only to undertake the printing of the book in question, for which he would have incurred no censure ; but also to subscribe his name, as the author, to an Epistle addressed indeed to Charles (II. ), but crammed with abuse and scurrilities against me, who had never set my eyes upon the fellow. To prevent any surprise at his pliability in thus consenting most impu- dently to assault me without provocation, and taking another's extravagances so readily upon his own shoulders, I will here give some ac- count of his treatment of others, so far as I have been able to make it out. Ulack — whence he sprung, heaven knows — is a sort of itinerant pamphlet-vender, a noto- rious scoundrel and spendthrift. For some time he sold books clandestinely in London, whence after innumerable shifts he was obliged pre- cipitately to decamp, over head and ears in debt. At Paris, he quickly revived his old cha- racter for dishonesty and profligacy, in the Rue MILTON^S SECOND DEFENCE. 41 St. Jacques ; of which likewise he was presently constrained to take a French leave, without daring ever to come near it again : and now, if any one wants an unprincipled and venal black- guard, he is to be found white- washed as a printer at the Hague. To prove how little stress is to be laid upon any thing he says or does, how promptly for the least pittance of money he will profane things the most sacred, and how little connexion public feeling (as might have been supposed) had with his tirade against myself, I will produce evidence out of his own mouth. Having observed that my c Reply to Saumaise' had been a profitable con- cern to the booksellers engaged in it, he writes to some of my friends* to request that c they would prevail upon me, if I had any thing ready for the press, to entrust it to his management ; and he would take care, it should be executed with much greater correctness than my former tract.' I answered, through the same channel, that ' I had nothing at that time in hand, which required the exercise of his art.' When lo! within a short period he makes his appearance as not only the printer, but the author too by * Hartlib, to whom Milton's ' Tractate on Education' is ad- dressed ; as appears from his relation of the same story, in his subsequent ' Pro Se Defensio : ' in which, by the bye, occurs a host of puns, founded upon Ulack's f Tables of Sines, Tan- gents, and Secants/ setting all translation and even paraphrase at defiance. 4$ MILTON'S SECOND DEFENCE. adoption, of a most scurrilous composition against the very man, to whom he had so re- cently and so officiously tendered his services. My friends indignantly expostulate with him. The impudent fellow writes back, that 6 he is astonished at their simplicity and inexperience, in expecting or demanding any regard to honour or honesty from one reduced like himself to such shifts for a livelihood ! * that i he received the Letter in question with a book from Sau- maise, who entreated him as a favour to do what he had done!' and that, ' if either Mil- ton or any other person chose to make use of his press in reply, he should not in the least scruple* to assist them in the publication!' — that is, either against Saumaise or against Charles, for against them alone could he sup- pose that such a reply would be directed. In short, you see what he is. I now proceed to the rest ; for more than one have lent their assistance in patching up this mock-tragedy of c The Royal Cry* against me. First then, as usual, the Dramatis Persona ■ Cry, who opens the business. Ulack, the blackguard ; or rather Saumaise, disguised in the mask and cloak of Ulack, the blackguard. * From the often-quoted ' Pro Se Defensio* it appears, that mack's words were, " Quid ad typographos tarn magnce con- trover site, nisi ut operant suam ?" * Why then, Ulack,' as Mil- ton immediately asks, " Jamosissimo libello tuiim subscriber e prqfessum nomen, quasi auctor esses, debuisti?" mixton's second defence, 43 Two Verse-mongers^ muddled with stale beer.* More, an adulterer and a seducer. A charming party, upon my word! A most respectable set of competitors for me ! Such as they are however, since our cause can hardly be opposed by any of a more respectable cha- racter, I will attack them in succession : only beforehand requesting those, who may deem my refutation occasionally deficient in gravity, to consider that I have to do, not with a grave adversary, but with a gang of strollers ; in re- ference to whom I have sometimes thought it right to lower the tone of my reply, beneath it's proper dignity, t to the level of my antago- nists. * This dramatising of the matter recurs, as a favourite figure, in the ' Pro Se Defensio : * as do also the Verse-mongers, under the name of Versijicatores, who had affixed two copies of verses to the * Regii Sanguinis Clamor ; ' the first an Alcaic Ode of Thanks to Saumaise, and the latter ' In Impurissimum Nebu- lonem Johannem Milionum Parricidarum et Parricidii Advo* catum, 9 both very indifferent productions. f A better principle is laid down in the Si ego dignus contu- tnelid hac maxime, at tu indignus quijaceres tamen, of Terenee ; in a passage of Demosthenes, * n*p* "Lt^m*/ 0*»» ^ xip » x.a*#$ fit- Q^kcti. (Plutarch. Apophthegm. Lacon, $\*Q. »«. I. 93& 8m Ed. Wyttenb. Oxon, 1795.) 4& milton's second defence, counsel or their protection, under the signature and at the hazard of others, not their own. Let then this empty babbler, whoever he is, cease to brag of his vigour and spirit in coming for- ward : while his man of unparallelled genius , forsooth ! forbears to give his illustrious signa- ture — not daring even to dedicate unto Charles a book, which professes to * avenge the royal blood/ except through the medium of Ulack his representative ; and poorly satisfied with en- treating a king, in the words of a printer, to permit a nameless book to be inscribed to his name I Having now done with Charles, he makes ready for his threatened attack upon me. After this introduction, the famous Saumaise will himself blow his terrible trumpet. You are the harbinger of health, and announce a new species of musical concert in preparation : for what symphony more suitable to this terrible trumpet, whenever it begins to roar, than a roaring \ I would not, however, have Saumaise puff up his cheeks too much ; for they will only, believe me, more temptingly invite slaps, which will harmoniously re-echo the delightful jingle of vour c famous Saumaise y * on both sides. But you go on to chatter : — Who has neither equal r , nor second, in the whole world of science and of * 'Famous' fortunately jingles with Saumaise, nearly as well as ScivfAjua-ioc, with Salmasius in the original, and that without the introduction of a foreign language. milton's second defence. 49 letters ; — gracious heaven ! And ye, insulted names of scholars! that you should thus be rated beneath a mere book-louse, with his hopes and concerns confined within the limits of an index; who would be completely distanced, if compared with any men of real learning ! This could surely never have been so stupidly advanced, except by some miserable driveller beneath the level of even Ulack himself. — And who has already exerted his stupendous and infi- nite erudition, in combination with a genius perfectly divine, in the defence of your majesty. If it be remembered (as I stated above) that Saumaise himself carried this letter, written either by his own or some other unacknow- ledged hand, and begged the obsequious printer to set his name to it, as the author himself did not choose to do so ; the mean and abject nature of the man thus giving currency to his own praises, and courting the exaggerated panegyric* of such a dull encomiast, will clearly appear. — For, while many vainly abuse his immortal work, it is a subject of amazement to lawyers, that a Frenchman should have so readily comprehended and explained the concerns, laws, statutes, and other public instruments of England, &c. On the other hand, from the evidence of our own lawyers I have abundantly demon- strated, what an ass and a parrott he is in these * Emendicatis laudibus I See a former note, t Pica, as he stiles him, in his Epigram upon Saumaise's E SO milton's second defence. respects. But he is now projecting a new im- pression against the rebels, which will at once stop the mouths of all carping grammarians, and give Milton in particular the thrashing he so richly deserves. You therefore, like the little herald-fish,* precede the shark Saumaise, in his awkward attempts to latinise some of our forensic terms, viz. i Countie-.court,' ' Hundred/ &c. This occurs, with much of the abundant demonstration here referred to, in his Pro Po- pzdo Anglicano Def., viii., and is happily translated by Dr. Symmons in his Life of Milton, p. 366. It implies some "clippings of the Corinthian metal" to try to mend it; but his candor will forgive me, though with his gold I combine Wash- ington's brass in the experiment. e Who to our English tuned Saumaise's throat, And taught the pie Hundreda's foreign note ? A hundred golden Jameses did the feat, An outlaw'd king's last stock : he wish'd to eat^ Let the false glare of gold allure his hope ; And he whose stormy voice late shook the Pope, And threaten'd Anti-Christ with speedy death, Will sooth the Conclave with his tuneful breath.' The imputation, however, of bribery is indignantly repelled by Johnson, as what " might be expected from the savage- ness of Milton" (Life of Addison); and, with a suspicious degree of soreness it is true, denied by Saumaise himself in his posthumous Reply, in which he affirms, that c Dr. William Morley brought him nothing from the exiled Prince but a letter of thanks for his exertions.' Wood too, in his e Athence OxonienseSy ii. 770 (most probably, upon this authority) asserts the same thing, and pronounces Milton ( an impudent liar ' for having reported the contrary. * This little pilot-fish (the Gasterosteus Ductor) is most frequently found in the Mediterranean, and in the tropical milton's second defence. 51 menaced c impression ' on our shores : and we are sharpening our harpoons, to drain from him whatever oil or blubber he can be made to yield upon the occasion ; not a little delighted, by the bye, with the more-than -Pythagorean benevo- lence of that great character, who in pity to the brute and fish-kind (upon which even Lent itself has no compassion) has provided so many tomes to wrap them in, and bequeathed to so many thousand of poor tunnies and pilchards a paper coat a-piece. ( Ye pilchards, and ye fish who glide In winter through our northern tide, Rejoice ! Saumaise, a noble knight ! Pitying your cold and naked plight, Prepares his stores of paper goods, Kindly to make you coats and hoods— Stamp'd with his name, his arms, his all ; That you, his clients, on each stall parts of the Atlantic Ocean. Catesby calls it Perca Marina Secteria, or the Rudder-fish. The latter name it probably obtained among sailors, from being often seen toward the stern of ships. Osbec indeed, who describes it as Scomber cceruleo- albus cingulis transversis nigris sex, deduces it from it's follow- ing the dog-fish, to which it is supposed to point out some victim. By Daubenton it is rather referred to it's attending the shark, which it precedes (or rather super-cedes) by about a foot and a half, closely imitating all it's movements, and dex- terously seising the floating remains of it's prey. It has so little confidence, however, in it's principal, that when the shark turns to catch any fish, it invariably starts away. The Dutch assign another motive for it's following vessels, and call it ' The Dung-fish/ It may be considered as a parallel to the Wry- neck among birds, and the Jackall among quadrupeds. E 2 52 milton's second defence* May shine above your brother-fish, Array'd in sheets, the pride or wish Of fishmongers and dirty thieves, Who wipe their noses on their sleeves.* * C. S. So much then for the long-expected edition of this noble volume ; of which while Saumaise (as you inform us) was c projecting an impres- sion,' you, More, were polluting his house by a villainous compression of his maid. And Sau- maise does, indeed, appear to have anxiously laid himself out in the completion of this prodi- gious work : for, being questioned a few days before his death through some one sent on pur- pose by a learned man, who himself told me the story, c When he intended to give the world the second part of his c Remarks on the * Cubito mungentium was a cant appellation among the Romans for fishmongers, and on that account was sarcastically applied to Horace's father. (Suet. c Vit. Horat. 9 ) W. This destination of the sheets of Saumaise's new book seems a favourite figure with Milton. It recurs in the e Pro Se Defensio,' and also in the ' Apology for Smectymnuus/ § 8., where he speaks of " folios predestined to no better purpose, than to make winding-sheets in Lent for pilchards." This may help us to the intended meaning of Scombri, though not accu- rately with reference to the Linnean System. See Warton's note, p. 483. The ( noble volume,' mentioned below, has an obvious reference to the Salmasius eques, and the Claudii insignia, &c. of the preceding epigram. Saumaise's family, however, was really ancient and noble, as appears from his correspondence and his biographers. The term ' impression/ which follows, is one of the infelici- ties of translation. milton's second defence. 63 Pope's Supremacy ? ' he replied, that c he should not resume that publication, until he had finished the c Answer to Milton,' in which he was then engaged.' So that I am to be refuted, even before the Pope ! and that primacy,* which Saumaise refuses to him in the church, he wil- lingly allows to me in his hostility ! Thus have I proved the protector of His Holiness' totter- ing Supremacy ; and turned aside this modern Catiline, not like Tully of old in my robes, nor indeed at all dreaming of the matter, but quite differently occupied, from the walls of Rome. Surely I have a claim upon more than one red hat in return, and perhaps may have cause to apprehend that the Pope will transfer to me the title of our late kings, as f Defender of the Faith ! ' You see then, in what an invidious situation he has placed me : but be the respon- sibility on him, who shamefully deserting his honourable post, and intruding himself into disputes with which he had no concern, has passed over from the cause of the church to that of a foreign state (to him totally foreign), en- tered into a truce with the Pope, and disgrace- fully patched up a peace with the prelacy,! * De Primatu Payee, it will be recollected, was one of Saumaise's celebrated works. t This inconsistency was objected to him, even by his friend Sarrau. Miratus sum, et proculdubib mecum erunt multi in eddem sententia, ubi legi in Prcefatione * Necessarios tibi videri Episcopos in regimine ecclesice Anglicance : ' tibi, inquam, qui 54 with which he had previously waged a most determined warfare. in Wallone Messalino adeb acriter eos insectatus es, utforsan inde arrepta sit, si non nata occasio eos penitus amovendi. (See Clement's Life of Saumaise, p. xlix.; who, however, attempts to repel the charge of inconsistency here alleged against his hero.) Hoe sane dicent esse ra kxi^co £*tevuv potius, quam tjj tcX&uu n&teSett. — — Dicetur, as he adds in a subsequent letter, calidum te etfrigidum eodem ex ore efflare. This honest adviser had previously pointed out to him the delicacy of the undertak- ing, as coupled with his obligations to the Republic of the United States : Pericidosce plenum opus alece aggrederis, De- fensionem dico nuper occisi Britanniarum Regis ; maxime cum Vestri ordines mediam via?n secent. Laudo tamen animi tui generosum proposition, quo nefandum scelus aperte damnare sustines. Hac tamen te cautione uti opus est, ne ita Majestatem Regidm extollas, id erga subditos amorem videantur Mi gratis largiri, Debent enim illi suis populis prcesertbn prodesse, quo- rum causa constituti sunt.-r-A large concession for a Parisian Senator in the midst of the seventeenth century ! — Satis sciunt hoc nostro cevo Reges, quce et quanta sit sua potestas ; omnibus qui illos accedunt aulicis certatim eorum auribus insusurrantibus, eos uno Deo minores posse quodcunque libuerit, nee idli mortalium debere administrations sues redder e rationem. Sed istius potes- tatis verum, legitimum, et moderatum usum pauci eos docent, duabus de causis : Prior est } quia Reges non amant cogi in ordi- nem, nee volunt ullas quamvis liberas pati habenas ; altera est, quia eorum qui iUos accedunt unum studium est illis placere et assentariy unde jit ut in immensum eos extoliere tantum laborent. Hos si effugeris scopulos, ad quos plurimi impegerunt, magnum feceris operce pretium. * * But it was not the character of Saumaise to be guided — except by his wife: and he is, in consequence, frequently reproached by his respectable correspondent for his fatal un- tractableness. De tuo pro infelice Rege Apologetico solens fads, qui fads quod libet, et amicorum consilia spernis. Quod milton's second defence. 55 "Let us now come to the charge, which he brings against me. Is there any thing in my tamen tibi proposueram, omni culpa et periculo vacabat. Con* suluisses, si Mud sequutusjidsses, et famce Regies et propria securitati. Videris velle irritare crabrones, et tuis inimicis occa- siones prcebere in te non sine occasione insaniendi, &c. &c. The offended critic remonstrated with acrimony upon such plainness of speech ; and Sarrau was obliged to soften his obser- vations. Scilicet non placet tibi libertas, quti soleo tecum de rebus scriptisve tuis agere. Monitus cautius agam imposterum — nihil est, propter quod ' durus, dirus, et non amplius amicus' credar. From the same series of Letters (Gudii et Sarravii Epistotce) we learn, that in the distribution of presentation-copies of the ' Defensio Regia/ the Dowager Queen complained of having been neglected by Saumaise ( f Quamvis eiiim, inquiebat, ' sit in re minime lauta, tamen potuisse solvere pretium tabellarii, qui illud attidisset ') / and also, by implication at least, that his sickness at Stockholm in 1650 was generally referred to the issue of his Miltonian conflict: Mitius et cautius Jbrsan aget deinceps cum suis adversariis. Ejus vehementior impetus bonis €t gravibus dudiim improbatus est : sed non solet facilem se prcebere amicorum monitis ; uti nee alii plurimi prcestantissimi viri, qui se suaque amant, et privatis affectibus indulgent. In Burman's Preface to the Collection, the character of this Coryphaeus of literature is strongly sketched : Erat Salmasio ingeniwm sublime ae pene divinum^ doctrina immensa, et memo* ria, qua cuncta ab omni cevo scripta complectebatur, ultra huma- nam sortem tenacissima ; sed cum paucos sibi pares duceret, ne* minem verb superior em ferret, contumeliose ac acerbe de omni' bus ejus cevi viris sentiret et loqueretur, et similis Pan Theocri* teoj cut Alt fyi[//US& froXol 7TQTI pV* KCt3-*)TCtt t omnium Jamam laceraret, cum omnibus fire contentiones et lites sxercebat. Hence his terrors, as he was of a suspicious and 56 milton's second defence. life or morals, upon which his censure can fasten ? Certainly not. What, then, is his con- duct ? That, of which no one but a barbarian could have been guilty : he reproaches me with my form, and my blindness. In his page, I am " Monstrum horrendum, hiforme, ingens, cui lumen ademptum" A monster — horrid, hideous, huge, and blind.* I certainly never imagined that, with respect to person, there would be instituted any compe- tition between me and a Cyclops. But he im- mediately corrects himself: So far however is he from being c huge,' that a more puny, bloodless, shrivelled animal was never seen. Although it be idle for a man to speak of his own form, yet since even in this particular instance I have cause of thankfulness to God, and the power of credulous nature, of personal retribution ; particularly of being cudgelled, or even smothered in a ditch, by his adversary Daniel Heinsius. Grotius was another distinguished object of his safe hostility — after his death, it seems ; as the widow of that great man threatened to publish twenty four of his letters addressed to her deceased husband, < ut videat orbis quantum ei vivo detulerit, qui jam defunctum crudelissime lacerat. At e puxupiTw conjux meus eum semper coluit ; quinetiam scepis- sime in libris suis honorifice compellavit, &c. The English reader, it is hoped, will forgive this long note ; and not exclaim, if acquainted with French (what is observed by Vorstius' Translator upon his hero's trop d'impetuosite) les per- sonnages moderes n'approuvent pas ce trop. * Virg. Mn. iii. 658., where the line is applied to Poly* phemus. milto'n's second defence. SI confuting the falsehoods of my adversaries, I will not be silent on the subject ; lest any person should deem me, as the credulous populace of Spain are induced by their priests to believe those whom they call heretics, to be a kind of rhinoceros, or a monster with a dog's head. By any one indeed, who has seen me, I have never to the best of my knowledge been consi- dered as deformed : whether as handsome, or not, is less an object of my concern.* My sta- * And yet, if we might trust the representations of his adver- sary, in his posthumous Reply, this was to his feeling" no indiffer- ent matter. Next to the barbarous sneers upon Milton's blind- ness, which abound in almost every page (such as, Bellua quce nihil hominis sibi reliqui fecit, prceter lippientes oculos ; — Malo isto magnam partem tuce pulcritudinis deperiisse, pro eo ac debeo doleo ; — talpd ccecior, &c.) stand those ironical observations on his size and beauty — Staturd pumilionem, malitid gigan- tem ;—formosus pasio ;—formce decore, quam semper plurimum venditdsti, fyc. particularly as estimated by his Italian friends: Quid Itali nunc dicerent, si te viderent cum istdjwdd lippi- tudine ? — quern olim pro Jcemind habuerunt ; — culcita ; — mol- iicellus et bellulus catamitus, &c. In the next paragraph, upon his stature, Milton perhaps remembered Aristotle's cl fjjMyot d'as-uoi m/a (rt/^t/^sTpoj, Kcttot £■' a. HS-. iv. 7« In this discreditable contest of scurrility, in which it must be owned the invectives of both parties are equally reprehensible for their coarseness, it could hardly be expected that Manso's punning distich (comparing Milton in c form, face, mien, mind, and manners' to an angel), or Milton's own tetras- tic on the S}9-«<5 V7T0 tyjc, ruffle, U.XX& «rfyy£f$ soix.ii>} patiols xcci ku.to'Jqo\y& kfi/ec T»xpovu o-wttiB spurn. Appius Claudius, qui propter invalitu- dinem oculorum jamdiu consiliis publicis se abstinuerat, venit in curiam, et sententid sua tenuit, ut id Pyrrho negaretur — sc. in urbem recipi (Liv. Suppl. Epit. xiii.) Metellus is, also, men* tioned ib. xix. To these ancient instances might have been added from Cicero, Tusc. Disp. v. 38., where the privations of blindness are discussed, the names of Antipater of Cyrene, and C. Drusus. Of the modern part of the catalogue, Zisca (so called from the loss of an eye) was chosen leader to the Hussites, and in the prosecution of their quarrel with the emperor Sigismimd lost the other at Rabi. He died A. D. 14)04 ; and his skin, such was the terror of his name, was converted into a drum. Zanchius, or Zanchy, a voluminous writer of great piety and learning among the Reformers, died at Heidelberg (where he had been appointed Professor of Divinity) A. D. 1590. But I may be told, by some modern Johnson, that " I am chasing a school- boy to his common-places." I will add however to the number, upon their own respective authorities, Ossian and Dr. Lucas, author of the excellent Essay on c Happiness/ The former, in the midst of his sublime apostrophe to the Sun (at the end of his « Carthon ') says ; ts But to Ossian thou lookest in vain, for he beholds thy beams no more; whether thy yellow hair flows on the eastern clouds, or thou tremblest at the gates of the west." See P. L. iii. 41. " But not to me returns " &c. quoted in a following note. And the latter : " Should I struggle to rescue myself from that 63 illustrious for their civil wisdom and heroic exploits ; Timoleon of Corinth, the rescuer of Ms own state and of all Sicily from oppression, one of the best, and — in every thing relative to the republic — the purest of men : Appius Clau- dius, whose patriotic speech in the senate, though it could not restore his own sight, relieved Italy from her great enemy, Pyrrhus ; Caecilius Metellus the High Priest, who lost his eyes in preserving not only Rome, but the Palladium also to which her fate was attached contempt, to which this condition (wherein I may seem lost to the world, and myself) exposes me ; should I ambitiously affect to have my name march in the train of those all (though not all equally) great ones — Homer, Appius, Cn. Aufidius, Didymus, Walkup, P. Jean l'Aveugle, &c. all of them eminent for their service and usefulness, as for their affliction of the same kind as mine ; even this might seem almost a commenda- ble infirmity," &c. (Pre£) He afterward, in the very spirit of Milton, affirms; " The soul can gaze on those charms and glories, winch are not subject to the bodily eye, the vultus. nimium lubricos aspici $ " pronounces her " happy in her own,- strength and wealth, ipsa suis pollens opihus ; " and represents her as " going out, like Dinah, to see the daughters of the land." (Gen. xxxiv. 1.) To the above list may, also, be subjoined the celebrated Irish bard Carolan, whose elegant little Composition on the influ- ence of beauty is preserved in Miss Brookes' ' Reliques of English Poetry.' It concludes thus : — f E'en he, whose hapless eyes no ray Admit from Beauty's cheering day, Yet though he cannot see the light, He feels it warm and knows it bright/ .64 milton's second defence. and her most sacred vessels from the flames; since the Deity has upon so many occasions evinced his regard for bright examples even t>f heathen piety, that what happened to such a man so employed can hardly be accounted an evil. Why need I adduce the modern instances of Dandolo, the celebrated Doge of V T enice or the brave Bohemian General Zisca, the great defender of Christianity, of Jerome Zanchius, and other eminent divines; when it appears that even the patriarch Isaac,* than whom no one was ever more beloved by his Maker, lived for some years blind, as did also his son Jacob,! an equal favourite with heaven; and when our Saviour himself explicitly affirmed, with regard to the man whom he healed, t that neither on account of his own sin, nor that of his parents, had he been Cf blind from his birth ?." In respect to myself — I call thee, O God, to witness, who " triest the very heart and the reins," that after a frequent and most serious ex- amination and scrutiny of every corner of my life, I am not conscious of any recent or remote crime, which by it's atrocity can have drawn down this calamity exclusively upon my head. As to what I have at any time written (for, in re- ference to this, the royalists triumphantly deem my blindness a sort of judgement) I declare, with the same solemn appeal to the Almighty, * Gen, xxvii. 1. + Gen. xlviii. 10. X Jolmix, 3. 65 that I never wrote any thing of the kind alluded to, which I did not at the time, and do not now, firmly believe to have been right and true and acceptable to God : and that, impelled not by ambition, or the thirst of gain or of glory, but simply by duty and honour and patriotism ;* nor with a view singly to the emancipation of the State, but still more particularly to that of the Church. So that when the office of replying to c The Royal Defence ' was publicly assigned to me, though I had to struggle with ill health, and having already lost nearly one of my eyes was expressly fore-warned by my physicians that, if I undertook the laborious work in question, I should soon be deprived of both ; undeterred by the warning, I seemed to hear the voice — not of a physician, or from the shrine of ^Escu- lapius at Epidaurus,t but of an internal and more divine monitor : and conceiving that by some decree of the fates the alternative of two lots was proposed to me, either to lose my * The honesty of this avowal is strongly attested by the story, which the elder Richardson relates (and Johnson, for the pleasure of rejecting it, repeats) of his having refused the offer of his old department, of Latin Secretary, from Charles II. after the Restoration. Why Milton, in 1673, should be unwilling to own his con- nexion in 1634 with the Bridgewater family, conspicuous as it was for it's unshaken loyalty, and at that time in high fevour at court, Warton ought to have explained (ib. 117. not. §). t Epidaurus was a town of Argolis, in Peloponnesus, where the heathen God of Medicine was chiefly worshipped. E 06 milton's second defence. sight or to desert a high duty, I remembered the twin destinies, which the son of Thetis informs us his mother brought back to him from the oracle of Delphi : A<^9-«JWs Y~r,px$ tpzpf/Aiv B-etvccloio TiXo^f E» (&£» ic r ccvB-l fjtjivuv Tpaav ttoXiv ccp^ipcc^uihai^ Ei h xiv 6ncct£ r UoifAi «*s j * Reach out your hand to friendship's fond fast grasp/ And, Aihfyye-w yjaf % o$yynel periclitentur. Homines, plerumque, propter scelera et pravita- ievt manus carnificum subeunt ; libri verb, virtutis et prcestanticz ergo. Soli fatuorum labores tales non metuunt casus. Sed sane Jrustra sunt, qui se hoc modo extirpare posse existimant Miltoni et aliorum scripta, cum potius Jlammis istis mirum quantum clarescant et illustrentur. (Burm. Syll. iii. 621.) Scilicet illo igne &c. remarks Tacitus with virtuous indigna- tion, in the Introduction to his Life of Agricola, of the times of Domitian. milton's second defence. 77 the mean while, still continue your invectives against me ! Still affirm, that I am worse even than Cromxvell ; the greatest compliment, in fact, which you can pay me ! Shall I in return pronounce you a friend, a fool, or an insidious foe ? c A friend' you certainly are not, for your language indicates hostility. Why, then, are you such 6 a fool' in your censures, as to think of setting me above so illustrious a personage as Cromwell ? Don't you know, or do you think I don't know, that the more virulently you ex- press your hatred to me, the higher in reality you raise my merits toward the commonwealth of England ; and that every sarcasm you utter against me, is a recommendation of me to my own party ? Your hating me above all others only proves that I, above all others, have tor- tured and annoyed and harassed you, and there- fore deserved proportionately well of my fellow- citizens : for the evidence and judgement of an adversary, however little to be depended upon in other respects, is one of the best we can have with regard to his own suffering. Can you, a poet too! have forgotten that Nestor recom- mended Ajax and Ulysses, when they disputed the arms of Achilles after his death, to refer the decision not to their Grecian friends, but to their Trojan foes ? Tttvix.ct Tfwtnv iiAiv t'Ofyoirt rip>^t bxatrctt. 4 Let theii some Trojans sage the strife decide :* 78 milton's second defence. and, a few lines below : 'Of get JtxjjK iB-ttxv tni o(, 6 Ayu- Utiwui to h\ott San^u fcctpio-cto-S-cti rat vrtpi rat A%iAteai$ tnrXcn Mfjttv T^wuv »ya.ym 3 vpwTiivT«yv o\. ' l rov Ofba-et*' rut ui%U/et?iUT6>v 9 cJajAet^ij tKttvo* tivxi rov upiotvTti r toi srtetfw AVTFnirxvTec rv$ *%$?%$> ^<>"* v wd-vq Tat OJWtr« Tit ottaoi. This wa& a much less invidious mode of determining the dispute, than that assigned by Ovid, in his Consedere duces, &c. milton's second defence. 79 bear the ideal heaven portrayed on the shield, for others not myself to view in the combat, to take the real not ideal burthen on my shoulders, for myself not others to feel it's weight. Having no resentment or private quarrel with any man, and (as far as I know) no one having any quarrel with me, I am the less disposed to repine at the scurrilities and invectives, which I incur exclusively on the public account : and, without complaining that I have had a much greater share of the calumnies than the advan- tages connected with our late revolution, I sit down contented with the consciousness of having pursued, and of still pursuing, honour- able ends for themselves alone. Let the world know this; and learn you that of the weal and wealthiness, with which you upbraid me, I never partook ; and on that particular account, which forms the principal subject of your accu- sation, I never fingered a single doit.* * Saumaise, in his posthumous Reply, says, quatuor millia librorum te inde jam in reditu habere ferunt, qui mentiri nes- ciunt. Ut aliquid degustares, tibi dederunt aliqua rpayxtox, prop- ter quae istam (sc. tyrannidem) eorum defendendam suscepisti. These rp«yy«tA»a however, upon Toland's testimony, consisted in a donation of 1000/. : neither is it probable that he received more, if we consider his subsequent employment and mode of life ; and that at the highest computation, after deducting two losses of 2000/. each, he left less than 3000/. behind him for the subsistence of his family. Let us hear what he himself says, in his f Animadversions on the Remonstrant's Defence : • "Do they think that all these 80 B1ILT0N*S SECOND DEFENCE. Enters More again, and in a second letter states the reasons of his writing — to whom? To the Christian Reader forsooth, More the adulterer and the seducer, Health ! A pious letter this promises to be ! " Now, for your reasons." The minds of all the nations of Europe, and more particularly of our French Hugonots, are roused to take cognisance of the parricide, fyc. $c. The Hugonots themselves have waged war with kings. What more they would have done, had they been more successful, cannot be positively stated ; but their kings, it is certain (if we may trust your national records) enter- tained no less apprehensions of them, than ours did of us : and they had sufficient grounds for their fears, in the numerous books and frequent manifestoes at that time circulated against them. Let them not then, whatever you may pretend, hold out gorgeous accounts of themselves, and unjust censures against us. But to the reasons : — / heme, lived in habits of meaner and superfluous things come from God, and the divine gift of learning from the den of Plutus or the cave of Mammon? Certainly never any clear spirit, nursed upon brighter influ- ences, with a soul enlarged to the dimensions of spacious art and high knowledge, ever entered there but with scorn, and thought it ever foul disdain to make pelf or ambition the reward of his studies ; it being the greatest honour, the greatest fruit and proficiency of learned studies, to despise these things.' ' The assertion which follows, relative to the French Hugo- nots, was repeated by More in his Reply, and repelled by Milton in his < Pro Se Defensio/ in nearly the same words. milton's second defence. 81 so much Intimacy with Englishmen of superior character (these c superior characters/ in the es- timation of men of integrity, are c superior ' only in infamy) that I can safely affirm, I know these monsters thoroughly and to the bone. I thought you had c known } only your adulteresses and harlots ; do you ' know also monsters, tho- roughly and to the bone h* My English friends easily prevailed upon me to suppress my name : and a most discreet mea- sure of theirs it was ; that so they might profit more extensively by your impudence, and their cause might sustain less detriment from your character, which was even then bad enough. For they knew you well, what an excellent God of the Gardens* you were : they knew too that, though now a shorn and polished priest, you had not kept your hands from Pontia, who had undergone neither of those operations ;f and that (as the hangman, from his concern with carnage, is stiled Carnifex) it was not for nothing you, from your concern with Pontia, of a simple * Alluding to his garden-adventure. See a former Note. The Priapus of the ancients, who was chiefly worshipped at Lampsacus, forbade the birds, &c. novis considere in hortis. With reference to the same story, Milton subsequently calls him Episcopum Lampsacenum, ex horto Priapum, &c. t This passage, fortunately, precludes translation. The epi- thet Pilata in the original, combined with Pontia, obviously alludes to the Roman Governor of Judaea. %2 milton's second defence, priest appeared to yourself a Pontifex.* Though both yourself and others, however, could not but know all this, with incredible and abo- minable impiety you dare openly to profess, that you only study and vindicate the divine glory ; and, at the very time that you are en- gaged in the most criminal pursuits, charge others with disguising their crimes under the mask of godliness — the identical conduct, of which you yourself are most flagrantly and most dreadfully guilty. In drawing up the seines of events (you say) you have projited much by several writers, but particularly by the 6 Elenchus Motuum Nu- perorum in Anglia.'t Absurd indeed! After * A f Pope/ We cannot doubt that Milton, if he had lived in these times, would upon this occasion have quaintly profited by the name of our late respectable primate, Dr. Moore. t The Author of this work (Angl. * Exposure of the late Disturbances in England') of which the First Part originally appeared I believe in 1()51, was a Dr. George Bates, Principal Physician to Charles II. and according to the writer of the £ Flagellwn/ " a worthy and learned hand ; " and from him (Elench. II. 331. Ed. 1676.) Noble, in his ' Memoirs of the Protectoral-House of Cromwell ' relates a filthy story of the Protector, by which he forfeited in early life the good opinion of his uncle, Sir Oliver. (See I. 98. Note.) A Third Part (now rare) under the Title of f Motus Compo- siti/ containing an account of Monk's return from Scotland, and the Restoration of Charles II., was published by a Dr. Skinner. The Second Part, having been attached to a second edition of the First Part, drew from the pen of a Mr. Pugh ia milton's second defence. 83 such a c cry ' to adduce nothing of your own, but a parcel of royalist writings, on that very ac- count undoubtedly to be suspected, and whose credit once overthrown puts an entire stop to your farther progress. I myself then will over- throw it, if necessary, by opposing one Eleii- chas to another ; and refute in due time, not your authorities by you, but you by your au- thorities. In the mean while, let us see how you support your own allegations, which are of a nature, when considered as proceeding from a debauchee and an atheist, to inspire every pious mind with horror. The love of God com- 1664 a Reply, entitled c EJenckus Elenchi' (likewise scarce) to which Milton here, probably, alludes. When we read the terms, in which Milton is characterised by the first of these Royalist Doctors, we are not a little surprised at the lenity with which he treats his calumniator: Conductitio calamo scribes cujusdam Jilii, e vappd Pcedagogo in novitium Secretarium re-* cocti, utuntur ; qui natus ad satiras et scommata, coeno spur* cissimo oblita lingua, Eikovox.Xc&?ioiv adornaret, et gliscente livido ingenio, Jallaciis et qffuciis Regicidium approbaret contra Sal-* masium. (lb. p. 120.) The gall of his second antagonist, in 1676, does not appear to have been diluted by the lapse of years : Pudendis hisce prodito- rum exequiis deficit uuicl audax Me Orator dicam, an Siticen ; ut qui (Latinus Regum cojivitiator) parricidarum partes et scelera scriptis sustinuisset : nunc torvi oris Ludimagister defunctos lau- daret pro rostris, aid patibidarium saltern latronum elegidia caneret ; tot scelerum monstris dignus orator, poeta haud in- dignus. (P. 90.) Such was. the language of party, in characterising the Author of the. « Paradise Lest ! ' G 2 84 milton's second defence. mands, and a deep sense of the injury offered to his holy name compels^ me to lift up my suppliant hands to heaven.* Down, clown with those * In the annual commemoration of this evenc, ordained by ©ur church, it is to be regretted that the second lesson appointed for the Morning Service is Matt, xxvii. ; as it involves a parallel, of which, we shall presently observe, the royalists were but too much disposed to make a very profane use. More, elsewhere, mentions the sacrum Regis caput : and both he and Saumaise seem to have thought, beyond Shakspeare (and with- out the plea of poetry for the hyperbole) that " divinity doth not only hedge," but form, a king. Mr. Ofspriag Black- hall, Chaplain in Ordinary to his Majesty, even ventured in a Sermon preached on the thirtieth of January, 1698-9, before the Honourable House of Commons, to call him " the best of Kings, and the best of Men ! " to the manifest disparagement, as Toland observes, of such men as St. Paul, and Socrates, and William III. (Amyntor, p. 166.) : a Mr. Long of Exeter was for having some portions of his pretended book, the E<*w> B*ff-a