RHHflffifl if«i H WSSSm ifttHil iTtlt MB m I it Iff mwh H $Sls§ I III 3B sSKbBh 'HI 1 Hi Hi H SfnffflTin BBS fini'MIStl Glass TX 4 6 3 Book ,N% RELATIVE VALUE OF DIFFERENT WEIGHTS OF TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS By Transfer SEP .-9 jgjs vU.7, % Report of an irr^ektigation by a Technical Committee Representing the National Canners Association, the American Sheet and Tin Plate Company, and the American Can Company. National Canners Association Washington, D. C. 1917 / RELATIVE VALUE OF DIFFERENT WEIGHTS OF TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS 3St- Report of an Investigation by a Technical Committee Representing the National Canners Association, the American Sheet and Tin Plate Company, and the American Can Company. National Canners Association Washington, D. C. 1917 < *> $& CONTENTS Page Introduction 5 Procedure: Preparation of the tin plate 7 Manufacture of the cans 8 Selection of foods and canning plants 9 Packing procedure 1(J Inspection of packs 10 Procedure in gelatine test on tin plate 11 Lustre and rusting 12 Results of the work: Distribution of tin on the tin plate 13 The gelatine test 16 Perforations 18 Condition of cans and contents 21 Amount of tin and iron in contents 34 General note 45 Exterior appearance of the cans <. 45 Summary: Brief description of the investigation 47 Summary of results 47 Conclusions: Specific conclusions 50 General conclusion 51 GRAPHS 1. Discoloration of cans of Illinois corn 29 2. Discoloration of cans of Indiana corn 30 3. Discoloration of cans of Maine corn stored on end 31 4. Discoloration of cans of Maine corn stored on side 32 5. Discoloration of pea cans 33 6. Average tin content of New York and Pennsylvania apples : 41 7. Average tin content of string beans 42 8. Average tin content of Illinois, Michigan, and New York pumpkin 43 9. Average tin content of New Jersey tomatoes 44 APPENDICES Appendix A. Analysis of steel, weight of coating on tin plate, and disposition of sheets in making cans 1 Appendix B. Details of packing 27 Appendix C. Methods of analysis 31 Appendix D. Results of gelatine test 33 Appendix E. Plate analyses 47 Appendix F. Weight of tin coating on individual cans at different inspections 96 Appendix G. Perforations and pittings in apple cans 341 Appendix H. Data on condition of individual cans and contents at different inspec- tions 342 Appendix I. Tin and iron in contents of individual cans at different inspections 576 Appendix J. Acidity of contents of cans 664 RELATIVE VALUE OF DIFFERENT WEIGHTS OF TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS INTRODUCTION The object of this investigation was to determine, from thoroughly com- prehensive and practical tests, the relative value of different weights of tin coating on commercial tin plate used for canned food containers. There has long been a theory that heavy tin coating was necessary on food containers and that many of the troubles encountered could be elimi- nated by still heavier coating than that used commercially. This belief of canners, manufacturers, and handlers of canned foods has been largely endorsed by food chemists and food officials. The theory has been so gen- erally accepted that it has even found expression in bills presented to Con- gress calling for certain specified heavy coatings on canned food containers. The literature on the subject showed only very inadequate and conflicting data, quite insufficient to form any basis of opinion either for or against the theory. In view of this situation, the Research Committee of the National Canners Association authorized an investigation of the relative value of different weights of tin coating. On February 4th, 1915, a General Com- mittee to conduct such an investigation was formed by representatives of the National Canners Association, American Sheet and Tin Plate Company, and American Can Company. The members of the committee were : Henry Burden, Chairman of the Research Committee of the National Canners Association. S. A. Davis, Vice President of the American Sheet and Tin Plate Company. PI. W. Phelps, Vice President of the American Can Company. W. D. Bigelow, Chief Chemist of the National Canners Association. D. M. Buck, Metallurgical Engineer of the American Sheet and Tin Plate Company. H. A. Baker, Chief Chemist of the American Can Company and Sec- retary of the Research Committee. The General Committee appointed a Technical Committee, consisting of: W. D. Bigelow and F. F. Fitzgerald, National Canners Association Laboratories. D. M. Buck and Bradley Dewey, American Sheet and Tin Plate Company. H. A. Baker and W. S. Sellars, American Can Company. The Bureau of Chemistry of the United States Department of Agricul- ture was invited to participate in the investigation. W. D. Collins and H. S. Bailey of that Bureau were authorized to associate themselves with the Technical Committee and took part in all of the work and discussions of the Committee. 6 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS The Committee received able assistance from the following named chem- ists who made all the analyses and gelatine tests included in this report: National Canners Association — H. M. Miller, P. I. Donk, E. S. Middleton, E. A. Hellmuth, N. J. Stockett, C. S. Mudge, P. 11. Cathcart; American Can Company— J. E. Robinson, B. S. Clark' 1-;. G. Ham, W. F. Nast, H. G. Gundakei% W. W. Willison, W. J. Foley, H. 11. Shinnick; American Sheet and Tin Plate Company, Metallurgical Laboratory — E. F. Moss, Hugh Ruffner, Walter Maurer, Nicholas Maurer; American Sheet and Tin Plate Company Research Laboratory — R. E. Zimmerman, C. A. Crawford. In order that the investigation should be broad enough to furnish the data from which a complete and definite conclusion could be drawn, experi- mental work was carried out on a large scale and a great many interfering factors were carefully provided for sj that they could not wrongly influ- ence the results. The work was carried out with many canned foods packed on a large scale under regular factory practice. It was considered that differences in results, as shown by either observation or analyses, might be caused by : Differences in factory methods. Differences in fruits and vegetables packed. Seasonal differences. Geographical differences. Appreciable differences in weight of coating on tin plate from the same lot, even when specially made. Possible variations due to steel. Differences in containers, due to can makers' practice. The scope of the work was, therefore, fixed by the necessity for remov- ing, as much as possible, the disturbing effects of the variables enumerated above, and this was done by making the work so broad that the effect of these variables was accurately estimated, or, in some instances, diluted to the point of ineffectiveness. For instance, one steel only was not used throughout, as it might not have been thoroughly representative of regular commercial steel. In order to take care of the steel factor in the investiga- tion, a sufficient number of heats of steel were included to make cer- tain that the average commercial material was being used. This illus- trates how the disturbing effect of a factor was safeguarded against by the multiplication of tests. The geographical factor was provided for by choosing different places representing different geographical conditions, so that an average condition was obtained. For instance, apples from New York, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, which in this investigation gave different results in their action on tin plate, were chosen to represent the apple pack, and the results from them were considered both singly and together. The main part of the investigation was concerned with the service value of the can with reference to the contained foods, and the report is writ- ten, in general, from this point of view. A supplementary study was made of the value of different weights of coating as regards the lustre and the resist- ance to rusting of cans. In carrying out the work, any differences, either in analyses or observed results, were standardized by a group of chemists from different industries and of diverse experience. .Variance in observation was corrected and standardized at times of observation. PROCEDURE 7 PROCEDURE PKEPAEATION OP THE TIN PLATE Selection of Steel As suggested in the introduction, it has been the aim in this test to eliminate, as far as possible, the element of chance, thus obtaining average conditions. Therefore, in selecting the steels for the base plate, it was decided to use the product of eight different heats, each from a different mill. In making sanitary, or open top, cans it is the general practice to use Bessemer steel for the bodies and open-hearth steel for the ends. For the purpose of this investigation, therefore, there were ordered approximately ten tons of bars from each of four different heats of open-hearth steel from four different steel mills, and four full heats of Bessemer steel, also from four separate mills. The bars were entirely representative in their character, not being specially made for this test and representing average practice. (See Appendix A, page 1, for analyses.) Bang-e of Coating- It was the desire of the Committee to obtain plates with a wide range of coating, including minimum weights considerably lower than those of the average tin plate used for cans, and from this amount, in regular steps up to and including a maximum considerably higher than that commonly vised. After careful consideration it was decided to produce, if possible, seven different weights of coating, the aim being in a general way to obtain the fol- lowing figures : A 0.90 pound of tin per base box B 1.10 pounds of tin per base box C 1.30 pounds of tin per base box D 1.50 pounds of tin per base box E 1.80 pounds of tin per base box F 2.10 pounds of tin per base box G 3.00 pounds of tin per base box The lower weights of coating were very difficult to obtain. Intermediate weights fall within usual practice, while coating G is representative of heavier coatings regularly manufactured for special purposes. Method of Manufacture Usual tin mill practice was followed throughout the manufacture ol these plates in the shearing, opening, black pickling, black annealing, cold rolling, white annealing, white pickling, and in the tinning operations, with the exception, noted above, as applying to the extremely light weights of coating. The plates, after being resquared to the exact dimensions, were pickled, dried singly, weighed in 50 sheet lots, and coated ; the tin pots being adjusted to give approximately the coatings desired. The 50-sheet lots were then re-weighed. The coating operations were performed under the direct supervision of the whole Technical Committee. Certain limits for acceptance or rejection of the various lots were adopted as follows : A 0.85 to 0.95 pound of tin per base box B 1.05 to 1.15 pounds of tin per base box C 1.25 to 1.35 pounds of tin per base box D 1.45 to 1.55 pounds of tin per base box E 1.725 to 1.875 pounds of tin per base box F 2.00 to 2.20 pounds of tin per base box G 2.75 to 3.25 pounds of tin per base box 8 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS In re-weighing the lots, if the increase in weight due to coating, calcu- lated into pounds per base box, fell within the above limits, the lots were accepted and marked with designating numbers, so that they could at all times be identified. If they fell outside the limits specified, they were rejected. In order that average conditions in coating operations might be obtained, each? weight of coating was produced on at least two different tin pots for each steel (except steel Z). The assorting of the plates was performed by a regular assorter, who was instructed to perform her duties in the usual manner, dividing the plates into "primes" and "wasters." There were produced approximately 200 prime sheets of each of the 49 kinds of plates used for body stock, and 150 sheets of each kind for end stock. There were manufactured altogether 6G2 lots of 50 sheets each, of which 144 lots were rejected on account of being outside of the specified limits in coating weights. (See Appendix A for detailed coating weights.) Description of Marking' A simple system for marking the sheets and cans was devised, by which it was possible to give a complete history of the plate. The four heats of Bessemer and open-hearth steel were given letters "W," "X," "Y," and "Z." (Until the plates had been manufactured into cans, additional letters, "O" and "B," signifying open-hearth and Bessemer, respectively, were used with these letters. After the manufacture of the cans it was obviously unneces- sary to continue designating open-hearth and Bessemer.) The tin pots used were arbitrarily given numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4. These numbers do not repre- sent the original tin pot numbers in the plants. The various weights of coating were given letters from "A" to "G," inclusive, as noted above. There- fore, in considering any symbol, for instance, W-2-E, we know at once that the can marked in that manner is made of open-hearth steel "W" in the end, Bessemer steel "W" in the body, that the plate was. manufactured on tin pot designated as No. 2, and that it is from a lot carrying approximately 1.80 pounds of tin per base box. MANUFACTURE OP THE CANS Open top, or sanitary, cans were used for all products except Illinois corn, which was packed in hole-and-cap cans. The cans were made with a locked side seam and outside soldering and fluxed with a solution of rosin in alcohol. To minimize abrasion the sanitary cans were manufactured on a standard body maker having an outside horse, so that all the scratching the inside of the cans received while on the body maker was due to the polished horn on which the body was formed. The curl on the sanitary ends was lined with rubber compound. The bodies for the hole-and-cap cans were manutactured in the same way, as the sanitary bodies, except that an inside horse was used, which caused abrasion. Commercial size cans were used throughout. The sizes used for the different commodities were as follows : Commodity Can No. Diameter Height Inches Inches Condensed milk and clam juice 1 2-11/16 4 Corn, tomatoes, peas, string beans, cider, pumpkin 2 3-7/16 4-9/16 Apples > 3 4-1/4 4-7/8 Evaporated milk 2-15/16 4-19/32 Salmon 3 4-21/32 Illinois corn 3-3/8 4-9/16 Tuna fish 3-7/16 2 PROCEDURE 9 The cans were manufactured under the supervision of the Technical Committee. In Appendix A will be found a table giving a list of the lots from which the plate for each size of cans was taken. The sheets, as selected, were slit as usual, and as soon as cut, each lot was marked with a designating symbol and stacked in order. All the cutting was finished before any can making was begun. In marking the plate, regular water-proof process ink was used. Each body blank was stamped with its plate designation, and run through a steam-heated dryer. When stamped out and lined, the ends were all marked, the packer's end being distinguished by a star. When all the bodies and ends were prepared and marked, the cans of each size were run through in a block. The flanging, seaming, and testing operations represented regular can factory practice in each case. From the tester the cans were conveyed directly to the warehouse, where they were put in cases and held for re-sorting, commodity marking, and shipment. After the cans were all made they were re-sorted into groups containing the correct number of cans for each pack, and' the descriptive mark indi- cating the food article to be packed was stamped upon them with process ink. Ends were set aside for each lot of cans, and wrapped separately in a sealed package. SELECTION OF FOODS AND CANNING PLANTS In selecting the varieties of food to be used in the experimental pack, the committee had in mind the various types of corrosion and discoloration in canned foods. The questions considered were as follows : 1. A black discoloration sometimes forms on the food or on the inner •surface of the can. This occurs with certain light-colored products, such as tuna, codfish, clam juice, corn, and shrimp. Corn, clam juice, and tuna were packed to represent foods of this class. An experimental pack of salmon was also put up for a study of the same question, although discoloration of this character in salmon is relatively uncommon. Peas were packed for a study of the formation of rust spots on the cans and the changes which these spots undergo on standing. 2. Acid fruits have a tendency to dissolve the metal of the container with the liberation of hydrogen, which eventually causes spingers. Under some conditions the acids also pit and eventually perforate the plate, causing the contents to become contaminated. To represent foods of this class, apples and cider were packed. Although perforation is not experienced with toma- toes, they were packed as representative of foods of fairly high acidity, for a study of the amount of tin and iron dissolved. 3. Certain non-acid or slightly acid foods have the property of dis- solving tin, although they do not liberate hydrogen and hence do not cause springers. String beans and pumpkin were packed to represent foods of this class. 4. Canned foods which have been held in cold storage sometimes sweat when removed from storage and the outsides of the cans rust. Difficulty of this nature has been experienced with evaporated and condensed milk and packs of these products were put up for a study of this question. The locality in which each article was packed in greatest amount was also considered. In the case of some articles it was thought the locality might possibly influence the questions involved, and more than one pack was put up. For instance, corn was packed in Maine, Indiana, and Illinois, and plants were selected which had experienced difficulty from the formation of black spots or black areas on the inside of the can. Pumpkin, tomatoes and 10 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS apples were each packed in three states. The location of the plant in which each article was packed is given in the following statement : Article States Apples Michigan New York Pennsylvania String beans New York Cider Michigan Clam juice Maine Corn Illinois Indiana Maine Milk — Evaporated New York Condensed New York Peas New York Pumpkin Illinois Michigan New York Salmon . Oregon Tomatoes Indiana Maryland New Jersey Tuna fish California PACKING PROCEDURE The experimental packs were put up as nearly as possible according to the regular practice of the plants. Where the material was being packed in cans of the size made for the experiment, the experimental cans were put in the canning line in place of regular cans. In other cases slight changes from the regular practice were made in filling and closing. The lots of cans were filled in the following order: W-l-A, W-l-B, W-l-C, W-l-D, W-l-E, W-l-F, W-l-G; W-2-A, W-2-B, W-2-C, W-2-D, W-2-E, W-2-F, W-2-G ; X-l-A, X-l-B, X-l-C, X-l-D, X-l-E, X-l-F, X-l-G; X-3-A, X-3-B, X-3-C, X-3-D, X-3-E, X-3-F, X-3-G; Y-l-A, Y-l-B, Y-l-C, Y-l-D, Y-l-E, Y-l-F, Y-l-G; Y-l-A, Y-4-B, Y-4-C, Y-4-D, Y-4-E, Y-4-F, Y-4-G; Z-l-A, Z-l-B, Z-l-C, Z-l-D, Z-l-E, Z-l-F, Z-l-G. Members of the committee were present and supervised the canning of all experimental packs except salmon and tuna fish. Data for the individual packs are given in Appendix B. Most of the packs were shipped within a day or two after packing. Usually, one-half the pack was sent to the National Canners Association at Washington and one-quarter each to the American Sheet and Tin Plate Company, Pittsburgh, and to the American Can Company, New York. The milk packs were kept at the plant in cold storage at 45° F. for about two months. The corn and pea packs were held several weeks before shipment. INSPECTION OF PACKS In making inspections of the packs, cans were cut at each plant before the contents had been subjected to the shaking which necessarily occurs during shipment, and again at Washington after they had been stored for varying lengths of time. For the preliminary inspections at the factory, one or two cans from each of the forty-nine grades of plate were opened and observations made on the general appearance of the products and cans. In the case of peas and corn, additional inspections were made at intervals after packing. For PROCEDURE 11 these a number of cans of each weight of coating was opened and notes made on the appearance of the contents, the appearance of the inside of the cans, and the nature of any blemishes such as black spots. The amount of such blemishes on the body, top and bottom of the can respectively, was recorded by the use of the terms "none," "trace," "medium," "bad," and "very bad." Each can, as a whole, was also given a classification corresponding to that of the part (body, top or bottom) showing the greatest amount of discolora- tion or other blemish. The practice at the inspections conducted at the National Canners Association in Washington was to take at random from the stacks a given number of cans of each product, to number the top, bottom, and body of each of them, to determine and record the vacuum in the cans, and then to remove the top with a machine especially designed for that purpose. The contents of the cans were then poured into white enameled dishes and examined. Where analyses of the contents were to be made, the products, after inspection, were sampled and later analyzed for tin and iron in accord- ance with the procedures outlined in Appendix C. Additional representa- tive samples were analyzed for acidity. (See Appendix J.) A record was kept of the number of the can from which each individual sample was taken. The empty cans were next rinsed and their condition noted. The bot- toms of the cans were then removed and the bodies cut open along the side seam and flattened. Each of the three resultant portions of each original can was analyzed (except top of hole-and-cap cans) for weight of tin by the method given in Appendix C* (Two samples for analysis were cut from the body of a number of the cans opened at the first inspection.) With this procedure the amount of tin and iron in the contents may be considered in connection with the weight of coating on the can from which the contents was taken. In the case of products showing a tendency to perforate, such as apples, additional inspections were made of the cans in the stacks at Pittsburgh and New York. PROCEDURE IN GELATINE TEST ON TIN PLATE Though the object of this work was primarily to test the action of various grades of plate when actually serving as food containers, neverthe- less it was felt that because of the interest that has been taken in the so-called "Gelatine Test"f a study of the action of the plate under this test should, for sake of completeness, be included. Consequently, two sheets from each lot were taken at random and packed in paper until submitted to this test. The gelatine test consists of flowing over a sheet of tin plate a solution of gelatine containing potassium ferricyanide, allowing the plate to stand for a number of hours after the gelatine has set, and then grading the plate according to the number and size of the blue spots that develop over minute imperfections in the tin coating. The blue spots developed by this test are the result of the reaction in the gelatine between the iron salts corroding out of the imperfections and the potassium ferricyanide in the gelatine. The only function of the gelatine is to hold the blue pigment formed by this reaction in a spot localized approximately over the imper- fection from which the iron dissolves. Striking as are its results, the test is open to considerable criticism and this work was, therefore, conducted *This method was accurate, in this work, to .03 pound of tin per base box. fSee "The Electrolytic Theory of the Corrosion of Iron and Steel and Its Applica- tions," by W. H. Walker, Jour. Iron and Steel Institute, 1909. 12 TIN COATING ON CANNBD FOOD CONTAINERS with a full appreciation of the fact that many consider the test unreliable for the following reasons : 1. There is no relationship between the size of the blue spots that are developed and the size of the imperfections in the coating. 2. There is no definite proof that iron alloys in the tin of the coating will not give blue spots. 3. It has been claimed that no two lots of gelatine act the same way as regards either the completeness with which they will bring out all the imperfections in any plate or the size of the blue spot developed from any one imperfection. Furthermore, it has been claimed that two lots* of gela- tine cannot be so adjusted by the addition of alkali or acid as to make them act in a uniform manner. This is due to the influence on the size of the blue, spots of such factors as the cleanness of the plate, the temperature at which the gelatine is poured, the rate at which the gelatine sets, the humidity and temperature of the atmosphere in which the test is carried out, the acidity of the gelatine, the strength of the ferricyanide solution, and other indefinite characteristics of various gelatines. 4. The blue spots are much larger than the imperfections and greatly over-emphasize the size of the latter. In the hope of eliminating as many as possible of these objections the committee adopted the procedure outlined in Appendix C. LUSTRE AND RUSTING As previously mentioned, the investigation of the external appearance of the cans was in the nature of a supplemental study, and both the procedure and results on lustre and rusting are given on page 45. RESULTS OF WORK 13 RESULTS OF THE WORK DISTRIBUTION OF TIN ON THE TIN PLATE It is an industrial impossibility to produce plates carrying a uniform coating of tin. With the best practice there will be variations from box to box and between different plates in the same box, and even different parts of individual sheets will vary in coating weight. In Appendix E are given tables of the results of analysis of six sheets (three open-hearth and three Bessemer), taken at random from each lot of each weight of coating. These sheets were each cut into 12 pieces, approxi- mately the size of can bodies, in the manner shown in the tables, and a four- square-inch sample taken for analysis from approximately the center of each piece. It will be noticed, from a study of the tables, first, that the average weight of tin, as found by analysis, is in nearly every case slightly less than the average figures obtained in coating the various lots. This is due to the fact that by analysis the amount of tin on the list edge is not shown, whereas the list edge is obviously included in the figures obtained by increase in weight after coating. It will also be noticed that in many cases there is a variation in the weight of coating on different parts of the same sheet; for instance, one sheet of W-l-A, varies from 0.88 to 1.05; another from 0.64 to 0.95; one sheet of X-3-A varies from 0.68 to 1.00; one sheet of Z-l-B varies from 1.10 to 1.58, and one sheet of W-l-G varies from 3.25 to 5.70. This same sheet has an average of 4.43, while another in the same grade has an average of 2.65. Many similar variations are to be found by a study of these tables. It is to be remembered that such variations are not unusual, and are unavoidable in all regular practice. Many areas are found in sheets of a certain class so far away from the average of that class as to place the can made from those areas in another class higher or lower. In some cases the average of the entire sheet is such as to place it in a different class from that for which it was intended ; for instance, one plate of Z-l-F averaged 1.73, which would place it in class E, although the 50-sheet lot in which it was manufactured fell within the limits for class F. The extreme variations in maximum and minimum coatings are more noticeable in the results of the analysis of individual cans, inasmuch as the number of analyses, and therefore the number of different sheets, is much greater. The weights of tin coating found by the analysis of many thousand cans, including all from which the contents were analyzed, are tabulated in Ap- pendix F (pages 96 to 326). In addition to the detailed tables, there are also given in Appendix F (pages 327 to 340) tables of maximum, minimum, and average results. These tables furnish the following data for each weight of coating at each inspec- tion of the different products: (1) average amount of tin on the bodies and ends of the cans ; (2) the absolute maximum and minimum amount of tin on the can, whether occurring on the body or end ; (3) a correction obtained by calculating to pounds per base box the amount of tin removed from the can by the product, as shown by the analysis of the contents ; this correc- tion added to the average amount of tin on the bodies and ends of the cans will give very closely the average amount of tin present on the plates from which the cans were made. There are also given for all products for each weight of coating the grand average of the average amount of tin on both the bodies and ends of the cans, the absolute maximum and minimum amount of tin on the cans, and the average of all corrections. A B C D E F G 0.83 1.03 1.19 1.40 1.70 1.96 2.94 14 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS From the corrected grand averages have been calculated the following results, which show the average original weight of coating on all cans of each weight of coating opened in this investigation : Average. . . The following summary table has been prepared from the data for the first inspection, given in Appendix F. The weights of coating on the bodies and ends of individual cans as given in the Appendix have been corrected for the tin in contents. The summary table shows the number of these re- sults, for each weight of coating, falling within specified limits and the num- ber and percentage of results for bodies and ends combined similarly classified. Particular attention is called to this table, since it reveals clearly the varia- tions in weight of coating, and also gives an idea of the extent to which one class overlaps others, heavier and lighter. RESULTS OF WORK 15 . . .NOHCOMMOOM'OCOHffiHiil 3**CT>aoo— ( C3 r- c )NiO-*H r-CDr- iCOCONCOH jccoio-hnc )C!ONrHN( MOThCDlNtDlOOOrH • • r-t j m in T-i co (M = ,_i oo en ^ T+t -^ »n j^cor-to^oooiN jTftOCCOHH ro co co o oo i—i ■-HCOONMNCO' ■ COOON(ON O^CNCOKDaCNO'INiOf 'ONCOHNHH tHCJOOCOC COO-rhNrH 33ddd3ddddddd3dddddddd33dd^3d dOO"ddHHHHHHHHHHN«M«NC'ieCCOCQ'*'*>0«>N ooooooooooooooooooooooooopooo OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOiOO'OOOOOOO iO«2N00050'-ilMCO'*mtDI>OOOC'HMMiONOC , liOOiOOOO 16 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS Inasmuch as such weight variations are found in tin plates made under the best practice, in considering the behavior of cans from a box of plates averaging a certain amount, one must realize that many of the cans carry a coating much lower than that average. Also, when minimum areas from plates have furnished cans which gave satisfactory service, it is justifiable to conclude that if the coating on all the plates was in all respects like those minimum areas, satisfactory results would have been obtained. This has been borne out by the results of this work. THE GELATINE TEST Since this test was carried out only for the sake of completeness, it should be emphasized before taking up the results that no broad conclusions should be drawn from the data. These data consist of grades given two sheets from each lot of each weight of coating, both Bessemer and open-hearth, both 12 and 36 hours after flowing the gelatine, by six members of the committee. With the plate spread out in lots of about fifteen at a time, each man marked each plate individually and without a knowledge of the gradings given the plate by the other members of the committee. These grades were expressed as figures on the assumption that a plate without blue spots would receive a mark of 10 and the plate showing the maximum amount of blue spots a mark of 1. The results of these individual and inde- pendent gradings have been tabulated in detail and are shown as Appen- dix D. The following table shows the average of all the marks given each class of plate : RESULTS OF WORK 17 Average Marks Given Different Kinds and Grades of Plate on Gelatine Test Kind of Plate Bessemer : W-l W-2 X-l X-3 Y-l Y-4 Z -1 A B c D E F G 5/ 4/ 3/ 4 5 ?34 5 2 4/ 4/ 4/ G 2/ 4 4 4/ 2/ 5/ 2/ 6/ 5/ 2 T ^ 4 5/ 4/ 4/ 4 4 4 4/ 4 3 4 4/ 4/ 2 7 7/ 4 4 4/ 4/ 5 4 4/ 4/2 3/ 3/ 4 3/2 4/ 4/ 4 4 4 4/ 2/ 4/ 4 4 6/ 4/ 3/ sy 4 4 4 4 3/ 4/ 4 4/ 3 3 7/ 6 5 4/ 4/ 3/ 4/ 5/ 3/ 4 4/ 4 6/ 6 6 Average 4 Basic open-hearth : W-l W-2 X-l X-3 Y-l Y-4 Z -1 4/ 4/ 4 3/ 4 2 3/ 4/ 5 4/ 3 5 4/ 4/ 3/ 4/ 4 3/ 4 4 4 3/ 4/ 4 5 3 2/ 5 4/ 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4/ 4 4 3/ 4 3/ 4 4/ 4/ 6 5 3/ 4 4 4 3/ 2/ 5/ 6 4 5 4 4/ 3 3/ 4 4 3/ 3 4/ 4/ 3/ 3/ 4/ 3/ 3 3/ 4 4 4 3 3/ 2 4/ 6/ 6 5 5 5 3 4/ 3 Average 4 3/ 3/ 4/ 4 4 4 From this table it is evident that, with the exception of the G coat- ing on Bessemer plate, the action of the plate examined, when subjected to the gelatine test, was independent of its weight of coating. However, it should be noticed that the basic open-hearth grade G plate received a mark of but 4. 18 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS PERFORATIONS Three packs of apples and one pack of cider were chosen so that per- foration tests might be included. The following is a list of the perforations in one case each of the 49 different kinds of cans containing cider. The number of perforations found was small and no conclusions of value can be drawn from the results. Perforations Perforations W-l-B 1 X-3-F 1 W-l-E 1 Y-l-A 2 W-2-A 2 Y-l-B 5 W-2-C 1 Y-l-C 2 X-l-A 2 Y-l-D 1 X-l-C 2 Y-4-D 4 X-3-A 3 Z-l-A 3 X-3-E 1 Out of the 4,704 cans of Michigan and New York apples stored at New York and Pittsburgh, only three perforations were found — one each in lots Z-l-A, Z-l-D and Y-4-A. The following table shows the total number of perforations in the cans of Pennsylvania apples stored at New York and Pittsburgh up to October 15th, 1916: RESULTS OF WORK 19 Perforations in Cans of Pennsylvania Apples, One Case of Each Weight of Coating, Stored at New York and Pittsburgh x-i Y-l Y-4 w-i w-: Coating A : New York 1 2 Pittsburgh 2 Total 1 4 Coating B : New York 5 5 Pittsburgh 6 1 Total 11 6 Coating C: New York . 4 Pittsburgh 6 5 Total .... 6 9 Coating D: New York 2 Pittsburgh 4 Total 6 Coating E : New York Pittsburgh 1 1 Total 1 1 Coating F: New York 1 Pittsburgh 3 Total 4 Coating G : New York 1 Pittsburgh Total 1 All coatings : New York 6 15 Pittsburgh 13 16 Total ...19 31 a Percentage of total number of cans ( each group) 37.5 At New York Toal number of cans of Pennsylvania Apples 1176 Total number of cans showing perforations 202 Percentage of cans showing perforations 17. 2 z-i 15 2 20 11 18 69 7 1 17 14 16 57 22 3 37 25 34 126 12 18 8 48 8 13 17 45 20 31 25 93 8 7 19 1 2 14 10 38 1 2 22 17 57 2 1 14 8 27 1 3 3 8 19 3 4 17 16 46 . 6 13 7 26 1 2 7 9 21 1 8 20 16 47 3 1 1 2 1 9 3 11 17 3 1 4 13 1 26 2 1 4 1 2 3 1 4 1 7 30 5 28 68 50 202 16 3 28 64 60 200 46 8 56 132 110 402 B c D E F G 27.7 17.0 13.7 14.0 7.7 2. At Pittsburgh 1176 200 17.0 20 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS The apples stored at Washington were used for inspection purposes and were not considered from a perforation standpoint. General observations indicated that the results were the same as those found at New York and Pittsburgh. Although the table shows that the results from the Pennsylvania apples are very erratic, the cans with the lighter tin coatings perforated, as a rule, much worse than those with the heavier tin coatings. These results would not be expected, in view of the fact that the gelatine tests exposed practically as many imperfections in the heavily coated plates as in those with lighter coatings. In connection with the erratic results of the table, it is to be noted that the only difference between plates W-l and W-2 is that they were coated on different tin pots. The same is true of X-l and X-3, also of Y-l and Y-4 plates. There is, therefore, no apparent reason why there should be 46 per- forations in the X-l cans, while there were only eight in the X-3 cans. There were 3? perforations in the Y-l-A cans and there were none in the Y-l-B cans. One each of the 49 different kinds of cans of Pennsylvania apples stored at New York was examined for pitting and perforations by opening out the cans and examining their interiors with a magnifying glass, using a sharp pointed needle for probing the pits; 14 of the 4!) cans showed perforation; 32 of the cans showed pitting. The number of pits found in the different cans varied considerably. (Table is given in Appendix G, page 341.) No perforations were found in the New York or Michigan packs. Only one small pit was found (can X-l-C) in the New York State pack. This emphasizes the great difference in the corrosive action of apples on cans. At the present time no explanation can be offered for this fact. It might be considered that the following points would have a bearing on the case, but they shed very little light on the subject: The New York apples were mostly of the Greening variety. The Michigan and Pennsylvania apples were of many mixed varie- ties. The cans were all filled the same way. Average content of can containing New York apples was 875 grams, Michigan apples 867 grams, and Pennsylvania apples 899 grams per can. Boiling water was added to the apples in every case. New York and Pennsylvania apples were not exhausted ; Michigan apples were exhausted one minute. New York apples were processed six minutes, Michigan apples seven minutes, Pennsylvania apples five minutes in open bath. New York and Michigan apples were well cooled, whereas the Pennsylvania apples were cooled only to approximately 140°, and there was some irregularity in cooling. All of the cans were stored on their sides. The head space in the cans was variable, especially with the Penn- sylvania apples, which seemed to have a tendency to take up more water than others. The New York apples had an acidity of 74.80 cc, Michigan apples 68.50 cc, and Pennsylvania apples 43.50 cc N/10 acid per 100 grams. The average vacuum in both the New York and Pennsylvania apple cans was approximately 4.5 inches, and 11 inches in the Michigan apple cans. The contents analyses show that the amount of tin taken up in the Michigan and Pennsylvania apples was approximately the same and was only about one-half as much as was taken up in the New York apples. The iron content in the New York and Michigan apples did not vary materially and was low. The iron content in the Pennsylvania apples was quite high and varied in a manner similar to the perforation results. RESULTS OF WORK 21 Packing of the Pennsylvania apples was interrupted and part oi the Y-l and all of the Y-4 and Z-l lots were packed the morning follow- ing the packing of the other lots. It was done, however, in the same way as the other lots, and it is difficult to see how the packing differed in any way. The above data furnish no explanation for the fact that the Pennsyl- vania apples were so much more severe in their corrosive action on the cans than the New York or Michigan apples. The results are so erratic that caution should be observed in drawing any conclusions, even from the one apparently clear result shown, viz. : that perforations are fewer in cans with heavier tin coatings than in those with lighter tin coatings. At the same time it should be borne in mind that serious perforations occurred in cans of Penn- sylvania apples with all weights of coating. It is clear that more experimental work should be done on the subject of perforations in apple cans. It might be pointed out that the corrosion on a can containing apples is probably dependent on the amount of oxygen present. The amount of oxygen that was originally present cannot be determined in samples that have stood for some time, as it disappears during corrosion. Apples appear to vary materially in the amount of oxygen con- tained in them, and this factor may account for the erratic perforation results. CONDITION OP CANS AND CONTENTS The notes taken on the condition of the individual cans and contents at the various inspections are classified as "Inspection Data" and are given in tabular form in Appendix H. Some notes were taken which are not given in these tables, inasmuch as later .inspections showed that the condi- tions noted had no bearing on the problem under investigation. The gen- eral observations made on the various products follow. The method of grad- ing cans for discoloration is explained under "Inspection of Packs," page 10. Michigan Apples The cans were uniformly well filled. The apples were very soft and generally white in appearance. There was no discoloration or abnormal appearance of the cans or the contents in any case. All the cans showed definite etching of the interior surfaces, with practically no difference be- tween the various coatings except that the higher coated cans, especially the G lots, were distinguished by the prominence of the tin crystals, which had been greatly accentuated by the action of the apples. No appre- ciable change was observed in the condition of the cans or contents after the first inspection. New York Apples The cans were well filled. The apples appeared firm and uniformly white. There was no discoloration or abnormal appearance of the cans or contents in any case. The cans were distinctly etched and showed surface darkening irrespective of the weight of coating. The only difference was the prominence of the tin crystals in the G coating. No noticeable change was observed as the pack aged. Pennsylvania Apples The cans were fairly well filled, although the head space was less uniform than in the other two packs of apples. The apples were very hard and did not have a uniform white color. The interior surfaces of the cans showed more darkening than either of the other packs. The cans were etched, although to a less extent than either the Michigan or New York 22 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS apples. This corrosion was more localized, especially along the water line, showing a tendency to pitting and perforation. Except as noted above, the cans had the same general appearance as the other two packs of apples. The only change noted with time was increased pitting and perforation. String- Beans The cans were uniformly well filled and both the cans and contents were normal in appearance. The surfaces of the cans Avere all slightly etched and darkened, the only distinction being a slightly greater amount of darkening and more prominent tin crystals on the heavier coatings. There was no noticeable change in the appearance of the contents and cans with age, except a slight increase in the amount of etching. Cider The fill of the cans was not uniform. The cider contained a large amount of suspended matter and had undergone considerable bleaching. The interior surfaces of the cans were covered with a very dark loose deposit consisting largely of copper. This was probably introduced by pre- heating the cider in jacketed copper kettles and was then plated on the interior surfaces of the cans in a finely divided black form. All of the cans were etched and no difference was noted in the appearance of the various coatings except the prominence of the tin crystals in the G coating. The appearance of the cans did not change perceptibly during the period of observation. Clam. Juice Both the cans and the contents appeared normal at the first five inspec- tions. Three individual cans showed minute black specks on the interior surfaces, but these were negligible and the contents were normal. The ordi- nary black discoloration first appeared on the final inspection. This discol- oration was adherent to the can, usually appeared in the air space, and was not related to the weight of coating. The contents in all cases remained normal. Illinois Corn The cans were uniformly well filled. The contents of but few cans showed traces of black discoloration, the distribution of which, according to the weight of coating, is given in the following table : Discoloration of Contents, Illinois Corn, Arranged By Weight of Coating of Cans 1 a b cd fj f g Number of cans 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 Per cent of cans whose contents showed — No discoloration 99.4 100.0 100.0 98.8 98.9 100.0 100.0 Trace 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Medium 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 Bad and very bad 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ''A summary of the data from all the Washington inspections (see Appendix H). An inspection, of the table shows that there is no relation between weight of coating and discoloration. The cans showed but very slight discoloration, occurring usually in the air space. The table on page 23 and RESULTS OF WORK 23 the graph on page 29 show that there is no relation between the weight of coating and the discoloration of the can. During the period of observation there was a gradual solution or disappearance of the black spots. Although a shifting of the standard of grading from inspection to inspection could not be obviated, the grading of the individual cans at each inspection is believed to be on the same basis. Discoloration of Cans, Illinois Corn, Arranged By Weight of Coating 1 a b c D FJ F g Number of cans 266 266 266 266 266 266 266 Per cent of cans showing — No discoloration or trace. 95. 9 98.1 98.4 97.7 96.9 98.1 97.0 Medium .3.0 0.4 0.8 1.9 2.3 1.1 2.6 Bad and very bad 1.1 1.5 0.8 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.4 Per cent of bodies showing — ■ No discoloration or trace. 96. 2 98.5 98.8 97.7 97.7 98.1 97.4 Medium 3.0 0.4 0.8 1.9 2.3 1.1 2.6 Bad and very bad 0.8 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.0 Per cent of tops showing — No discoloration or trace. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.6 Medium 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Bad and very bad 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. a Per cent of bottoms showing — No discoloration or trace. 99. 6 99.6 99.6 100.0 98.9 100.0 100.0 Medium 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Bad and very bad 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1 A summary of all inspection data on Illinois Corn (see Appendix H). Indiana Corn The cans were fairly well filled. The contents of many of the cans were badly discolored. The amount of discoloration showed a decrease with increase of coating, as shown in the following table : Discoloration of Contents, Indiana Corn, Arranged By Weight of Coating of Cans 1 a b c d fj f g Number of cans 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 Per cent of cans whose contents showed — No discoloration 68.6 70.8 77.2 82.9 84.6 82.3 86.2 Trace 13.7 14.9 13.1 8.0 6.3 8.0 6.3 Medium 5.1 7.4 8.6 5.1 5.7 6.3 4.6 Bad and very bad 12.6 6.9 1.1 4.0 3.4 3.4 2.9 1 A summary of the data from all Washington inspections except the second, where notes on the contents of the individual cans were not recorded (see Appendix H). The cans were likewise badly discolored. The distribution of the black areas, according to the amount of coating, is given in the table on page 24. This and the graph on page 30 show the relative amounts of discoloration 24 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS appearing" on the different parts of the cans for each weight of coating. It will be seen that the amount of discoloration, although bad with all coatings, showed some tendency to decrease as the weight of coating increased. This discoloration gradually dissolved or tended to disappear as the cans aged. Discoloration of Cans, Indiana Corn, Arranged By Weight of Coatjxg 1 A B C D E F G Number of cans 2 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 Per cent of cans showing — No discoloration or trace. 14. 3 8.3 7.2 5.9 8.3 12.3 19.0 Medium 25.7 29.4 30.9 40.1 41.3 49.6 35.0 Bad and very bad 60.0 62.3 61.9 54.0 50.4 38.1 46.0 Per cent of bodies showing — No discoloration or trace. 15. 8 12.3 9.1 7.9 11.9 21.0 27.4 Medium 27.8 32.1 34.9 44.0 50.8 49.2 42.0 Bad and very bad 56.4 55.6 56.0 48.1 37.3 29.8 30.6 Per cent of tops showing — No discoloration or trace . 97 . 7 95.4 96.2 98.4 96.2 98.4 94.7 Medium 0.8 3.1 2.3 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.5 Bad and very bad 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.8 2.3 0.8 3.8 Per cent of bottoms showing — No discoloration or trace . 75 . 3 68.8 65.4 67.1 68.4 73.2 70.6 Medium 7.8 9.1 14.3 14.7 9.5 10.4 9.5 Bad and very bad 16.9 22.1 20.3 18.2 22.1 16.4 19.9 1 A summary of all inspection data on Indiana Corn (see Appendix H). Two hundred and fifty-two cans were examined. No observations were recorded on the tops or bottoms of 21 cans of each grade. The percentages of tops and bottoms recorded above are therefore based on the remaining 231 cans. Maine Corn Stored on End Under this heading are considered the cans of Maine corn that were stored on end. The cans were uniformly well filled. The contents of some of the cans were discolored, usually only to a slight extent, as shown by the following table : Discoloration of Contents, Maine Corn Stored on End, Arranged By Weight of Coating of Cans 1 a b c d e f g Number of cans 138 137 140 148 139 140 135 Per cent of cans whose contents showed — No discoloration 89.0 92.6 95.7 100.0 97.8 98.6 99.3 Trace 8.0 4.4 2.9 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.7 Medium 1.5 1.5 0.7 0.0 1.5 0.7 0.0 Bad and very bad 1.5 1.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 A summary of data from all Washington inspection (see Appendix H). The can tops were badly discolored, but the bottoms and bodies were free from black. The classification given the cans, therefore, was based on the amount of black appearing on the tops. The table that follows and the RESULTS OF WORK 25 graph on page 31 show the relative distribution of the discoloration accord- ing to the weight of coating and indicate that, although the discoloration was bad with all coatings, there was a decrease in discoloration with the in- crease in the weight of coating. The discoloration gradually decreased with borage. Discoloration of Cans, Maine Corn Stored on End, Arranged By Weight of Coating 1 a b c d b p g Number of cans 159 158 161 159 160 161 156 Per cent of cans showing — No discoloration or trace . 37 . 1 45.6 39.8 42.8 45.0 49.7 49.4 Medium 18.9 19.6 22.3 23.9 24.4 18.6 25.6 Bad and very bad 44.0 34.8 37.9 33.3 30.6 31.7 25.0 *A summary of all inspection data on Maine Corn stored on end (see Appendix H). Maine Corn Stored on Side This included one case of each lot of Maine corn which was stored on the side. The cans were well filled. The contents of some of the cans were discolored without reference to weight of coating, as shown by the following table : Discoloration of Contents, Maine Corn Stored on Siee, Arranged By Weight of Coating of Cans 1 a b c d e f g Number of cans 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 Per cent of cans whose contents showed — No discoloration 85.7 81.3 83.5 82.1 82.1 89.3 82.1 Trace ...5.0 7.9 8.6 7.2 5.7 2.1 8.6 Medium 5.0 2.9 3.6. 5.7 7.9 2.9 2.9 Bad and very bad 4.3 7.9 4.3 5.0 4.3 5.7 6.4 1 A summary of the data from all Washington inspections except the fifth, when an unequal number of cans was examined (see Appendix H). The cans were badly discolored, usually in the air space. The distribution of this discoloration and its position in the can is shown in the table on page 26 and by the graph on page 32. The discoloration was uniformly bad in all coatings. A gradual improvement in the condition of the cans and contents was noted as the inspections proceeded. ■ 26 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS Discoloration of Cans, Maine Corn Stored on Side, Arranged By Weight of Coating 1 a b c d e f g Number of cans 168 168 168 168 168 168 168 Per cent of cans showing — No discoloration or trace. 47. 6 47.0 45.2 40.4 42.8 47.6 48.2 Medium 22.0 23.2 28.0 30.4 26.8 32.2 20.8 Bad and very bad 30.4 29.8 26.8 29.2 30.4 20.2 31.0 Per cent of bodies showing — No discoloration or trace. 54. 8 50.0 48.8 45.8 49.4 53.0 60.7 Medium 21.4 24.4 29.8 29.2 25.0 31.6 22.6 Bad and very bad 23.8 25.6 21.4 25.0 25.6 15.4 16.7 Per cent of tops showing — No discoloration or trace. 87. 5 90.0 92.2 91.0 86.9 88.1 80.2 Medium 3.6 4.7 1.8 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 Bad and very bad 7.9 5.3 6.0 6.0 10.1 8.3 16.1 • Per cent of bottoms showing — No discoloration or trace. 96. 4 97.6 94.6 95.8 99.4 98.2 87.3 Medium 0.0 1.2 1.2 1.8 0.6 0.6 3.0 Bad and very bad 3.6 1.2 4.2 2.4 0.0 1.2 10.7 1 A summary of all inspection data on Maine Corn stored on side except the fifth Washington inspection, which contained an unequal number of cans (see Appendix H). Condensed Milk Many of these cans were over filled. The contents were normal. Although the cans had been held in cold storage for two months and shipped on a humid day, the exterior surfaces of the cans were clean and free from rust. The interior surfaces were new bright. No change in the condition of the cans or contents was noted during the period of observation. Evaporated Milk The contents of the cans were normal. These cans were stored and shipped in the same manner as the condensed milk and their exterior sur- faces like those of the latter were clean and free from rust. All can interiors showed etching, which was quite uniform throughout the different coatings. No change was observed in the condition of the cans or contents during the period of observation. Illinois Pumpkin The cans were well filled. The pumpkin was normal in appearance and was practically free from discoloration. The tin on the cans was severely attacked. The only distinction was the prominence of the tin crys- tals in the heavier coatings and the slightly darker appearance of the lighter coatings due to the removal of the tin. No change was observed in the condition of the cans or contents during the period of observation, except the gradual increase in the darkening and etching of the cans. Michigan Pumpkin The fill of the cans was not uniform. The pumpkin showed a grayish discoloration in the air space, which was probably caused by slack filling and lack of proper exhaust. All the cans were etched, especially the A RESULTS OF WORK 27 and B coatings, but in general to less extent than the Illinois and New York pumpkin cans. No change was observed in the condition of the cans or the contents during the period of observation. New York Pumpkin The cans were well filled. The contents showed very little discolora- tion. The cans showed a decided etching without much difference in the various coatings. The lighter coated cans were darker than those with the heavier coatings, while the G cans were characterized by the more pro- nounced tin crystals. There was no noticeable change observed in this product during the period of storage, except the gradual increase in the darkening and etching of the cans. Peas The cans were uniformly well filled. The appearance of the contents was normal. The interior surfaces of all the cans showed a more or less pronounced dark blue discoloration (normal to peas), except the portions of the cans above the surface of the liquid during processing. The portions of the plate which were above the water line of the contents during initial storage after processing were more or less rusted or blackened. At the first preliminary inspection these spots were rusty in appearance, but gradually darkened and finally toned down until they were scarcely noticeable. Although all the cans were satisfactory, those made from the Z plate had a better appearance than those prepared from the other plate. As stated above, there was a gradual improvement in the appearance of the cans throughout the period of observation. Inspection data on the individual cans of peas, as given in Appendix H, have been summarized in the following table : Discoloration of Pea Cans Arranged By Weight of Coating 1 A B C D E F G Number of cans 168 168 168 168 168 168 168 Per cent of cans showing — No discoloration or trace. 11. 3 20.2 21.4 17.9 24.4 21.4 36.9 Medium 22.6 28.6 39.3 35.4 44.1 41.1 42.3 Bad and very bad 66.1 51.2 39.3 45.7 31.5 37.5 20.8 1 A summary of all Washington inspection data on Peas (see Appendix H). This summary table gives the classification of the cans according to the amount of discoloration. The cans are graded into three classes and the figures for each class are given in the table and plotted graphically on page 33. It is to be noted that as the weight of coating increases there is a gradual increase in the percentage of cans classified as "None" and "Trace," and a cor- responding decrease in the number of "Bad" and "Very Bad" containers. While the discoloration was present in cans made from all weights of coating, it must be kept in mind that this discoloration in peas was not objectionable and that cans made from all weights of coating were satisfactory. Indiana Tomatoes The cans were not uniformly well filled. The contents showed a varia- tion in color caused by different degrees of ripeness of the tomatoes. The cans showed only the usual etching and darkening characteristic of tomato cans and no change in the condition of cans or contents was noted during the period of storage. 28 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS Maryland Tomatoes The cans were well filled. The contents were normal in appearance, except that there was a variation in color due to different degrees of ripe- ness of the tomatoes. The cans were similar in appearance to those of the Indiana tomatoes. K"ew Jersey Tomatoes Some of these cans were over filled. The tomatoes were uniformly ripe and of normal appearance. The cans were similar in appearance to those of the Indiana and Maryland tomatoes. Tuna Fish A large number of the cans of this pack were over filled. The cans in all cases showed a general purple discoloration, which is normal to this product, but in the table in the appendix only definitely black discoloration which took the form of isolated spots is considered. There was no distinc- tion between the various coatings as to appearance of either cans or contents. Salmon Observations on the cans containing this product were made with diffi- culty on account of the skin adhering to the surface of the cans. Only slight indications of rusting were found in the clear portions of some of the cans. There was no apparent difference between the various coatings and no change in the condition of the cans or contents was noted during the time of observation. RESULTS OF WORK 1. — Discoloration of Cans of Illinois Corn \/5AO s4A/D l/£&y &*£> WZZ\ M£~D/t/A7 f" I 775W-2T ^IMD A/OA/S /OOr l-i.2_i.i-li l.i.s. LI. s.I - i -i i i i 'i i i i i i ■ i i i i i , i i J - i i i i i i i r , i i i i i i i i i , ... .1. S3 - 90 k es \ < b I- /O O /4 3C£> _f~. /4& C Z>_5V /4 BOO _5" rOy&S 1 &07TOA7& This plot shows graphically the figures given in the summary table on page 23. The percentage of the total number of cans, bodies, tops, and bottoms graded as Bad and Very Bad, Medium, and Trace and None are represented by the lengths of the solid black, the shaded, and the white areas, respectively. 30 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS 2. — Discoloration of Cans of Indiana Corn \3/10 ^?A£? W£~/?r ^5WZ? A7£~£)/£//*7 I I T/Z4G^ SIA/& A/OAAT /oo I iiiiiiiiiuiiipifnri i <9C" £> S £0 s4 &££& SO£>/£lS y4 BO £>/? £& &orrc?A7,s This plot shows graphically the figures given in the summary table on page 24. The percentage of the total number of cans, bodies, tops, and bottoms graded as Bad and Very Bad, Medium, and Trace and None are represented by the lengths of the solid black, the shaded, and the white areas, respectively. RESULTS OF WORK 3. — Discoloration of Cans of Maine Corn Stored on End 31 \AZ£Z)/C/A7 I 1 T&4CjE- S7A4D A/OA4E- /OO ^ £ C D^-^C? This plot shows graphically the figures given in the summary table on page 25. The percentage of the total number of cans graded as Bad and Very Bad, Medium, and Trace and None are represented by the lengths of the solid black, the shaded, and the white areas, respectively. 32 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS 4. — Discoloration of Cans of Maine Corn Stored on Side \/3s4Z3 ^A/£> K£~/?y 3/9 £> r7£-£>/(S/ A/OM^ /OO /O II I I I I I I W /5 C Z? £~ '^ & CS4A/& s4 &&£> £'j c -& This plot shows graphically the figures given in the summary table on page 26. The percentage of the total number of cans, bodies, tops, and bottoms graded as Bad and Very Bad, Medium, and Trace and None are represented by the lengths of the solid black, the shaded, and the white areas, respectively. RESULTS OF WORK 5. — Discoloration of Pea Cans A7&D/CA7 77tMGE'/4M0 AVOAV^ 33 /oo &s so \ 1 1 /& /o JT /4 & C £>. «.. a^A/tS' This plot shows graphically the figures given in the summary table on page 27. The percentage of cans graded as Bad and Very Bad, Medium, and Trace and None are represented by the lengths of the solid black, the shaded, and the white areas, respec- tively. 34 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS AMOUNT OP TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS The amount of tin and iron in the contents of the individual cans was determined by the methods described in Appendix C. The results reported are probably accurate to 10 milligrams per kilogram of product, with a tin content of 100 milligrams per kilogram. With larger amounts of tin the results are proportionally accurate. With very small amounts the error may be relatively larger. The iron determinations are as accurate as those for tin. The amounts of tin and iron found in each can of food analyzed, expressed as milligrams per kilogram of product, are, given in Appendix I. Summary tables derived from these data are given on pages 37 to 40. These sum- mary tables show the average quantities of tin and iron in the contents for each weight of coating at each inspection. It must be kept in mind that all fruits and vegetables naturally contain iron, and that the iron reported in the tables is the total of that naturally present in the product and that dis- solved from the container. In conducting an investigation of this magnitude it was impossible to run check analyses, and likewise impossible to prevent occasional contamina- tion of individual cans either during the canning operations or during the later inspection of the product. Such contaminations or loss may account for unusual values, especially for iron. The following conclusions are based on the analytical, data obtained for the individual products, as summarized in the following tables . Michigan, New York and Pennsylvania Apples The total quantity of tin dissolved increased slightly during storage of the product. The average tin content for all cans opened at the first inspec- tion and the final inspection were, respectively, 68 and 73 milligrams per kilo- gram for Michigan apples, 166 and 175 milligrams for New York apples and 63 and 79 milligrams for Pennsylvania apples. It is evident from the figures given in the summary tables on pages 37 and 39 and the graph on page 41 that the weight of coating has no relation to the amount of tin dissolved during one year's storage. With the exception of Pennsylvania apples, which show a much wider variation in the iron content, both of individual cans as given in the detail table, and of the average as given in the. summary table, there is no appre- ciable decrease in iron with increase in the weight of coating. The Penn- sylvania apples that were packed in the cans with lighter coatings showed, as already mentioned, a higher percentage of perforations, and here also an increase in dissolved iron with decreased weight of coating will be noticed. Probably the same conditions which were responsible for the increased num- ber of perforations in the lighter coated cans also caused the larger quanti- ties of iron in the contents. To a very slight extent the iron in the Michigan and New York apples did decrease as the weight of coating increased. There was no significant change in the iron content during the period of storage. String Beans The average tin content in the cans of string beans with A coating was 85 milligrams per kilogram of product at the first inspection and in- creased regularly with time of storage to 181 milligrams at the end of thir- teen and one-half months. A similar increase occurred in the cans of each of the other coatings. The tin content of string beans increased regularly with increase in the weight of coating of the cans. For example, at the first inspection, the contents of the A cans contained 85 milligrams of tin per kilogram and there was a regular increase in the amount of tin as the weight of coating increased, up to 144 milligrams for the cans with G coat- ing. A similar increase is noted in all the other inspections, which is shown graphically on page 42. RESULTS OF WORK 35 There is no apparent relation between the coating weight of the con- tainer and the amount of iron dissolved, neither is there any appreciable increase in iron content during one year's storage of the product. Cider In cider the average figures for tin content, while less consistent than those for string beans, show a slight but definite increase with storage. There is no relation between the weight of coating on the container and the amount of tin found in the contents. The amount of iron in cider decreased with increase in weight of coat- ing of the container, as was noted in the case of apples. Clam Juice With clam juice there is little variation in either the tin or iron content during time of storage, or with different weights of coating. The average amount of tin varied between 17 and 34 milligrams per kilogram of juice. Illinois, Indiana and Maine Corn One can of each of the forty-nine separate lots of each pack of corn was analyzed at the first inspection and at the fifth inspection seven composite samples were analyzed. The composite sample called A was made by thor- oughly mixing one can each of W-l-A, W-2-A, X-l-A, X-3-A, Y-l-A, Y-4-A and Z-l-A. Similarly, composites for each of the other weights of coating were prepared. The figures obtained from these samples indicate that the amount of tin and iron in the corn increases slightly during storage, but this increase has little significance, as the total amounts found are very small. The tin varied from 11 to 25 milligrams and the iron from 4 to 10 milligrams per kilogram of product. Condensed Milk The amount of tin and iron in condensed milk increased slightly during storage, but the increase had little significance, as the total amounts were very small. The tin varied from five to 22 milligrams, and the iron from two to 10 milligrams per kilogram of product. Evaporated Milk The average tin content of evaporated milk varied from 60 to 106 milli- grams per kilogram of milk, which was considerably higher than with con- densed milk. The iron content varied from two to five milligrams per kilo- gram. There was a slight but definite increase in tin and iron content with storage. Differences in coating had no effect upon the solution of tin and iron. Feas In peas the average tin content varied from 14 to 22 and the iron from 21 to 34 milligrams per kilogram of product. Neither time of storage nor weight of coating had any appreciable effect on the iron or tin content. Illinois, Michigan and New York Pumpkin The total amount of tin present in pumpkin was higher than with the other products, varying from a minimum average* of 39 to a maximum average* of 666 milligrams per kilogram. The increase, both with time of storage and with increased weight of coating, was marked and is graph- *Minimum and maximum average as given in the summary table, page 38. 36 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS ically shown by the plate on page 43. It will be noted that at each inspec- tion and for each weight of coating the New York pumpkin had uniformly a lower tin content than the Michigan pumpkin and the latter in turn lower than the Illinois pumpkin. The iron content, as shown in the summary table on page 40, varied from a minimum average of 15 milligrams to the maximum average of 28 milligrams per kilogram, and increased very slightly with storage. There was only an insignificant variation in the iron content among the various weights of coating. Indiana, Maryland and New Jersey Tomatoes Tomatoes differed from pumpkin, where a marked increase in tin content was noted as the coating weight of the container increased. An increase in the coating of the container apparently prevented to some extent the solution of tin by tomatoes. For instance, in Indiana tomatoes, after one year's storage, the A can showed an average of 89 milligrams per kilo- gram of product, while the G cans contained 68 milligrams. The results with the New Jersey tomatoes are shown graphically on page 44. With a few exceptions the average figure for the iron content in all the tomatoes at all inspections was about six milligrams per kilogram, and there was no change with storage of the product or with variation in the weight of coating on the container. Tuna Fish At the first inspection, the average amount of tin in tuna varied from a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 15, and after 12 months from 23 to 38 milligrams per kilogram of product, showing a slight increase in tin during the period of storage. The figures for iron at the first inspection varied from nine to 17, and at the end of the storage period from 11 to 20 milligrams per kilogram of product, indicating a negligible increase with storage. The amount of tin dissolved apparently bears no relation to the weight of coating, while with the iron the small amount of data obtained indicated a decrease with in- creased weight of coating. The total amount of iron present, however, is so small that little if any significance should be attached to these results. Salmon The salmon was analyzed only at the fifth inspection, and composite samples instead of the contents of individual cans were taken for these analyses (see corn). The average minimum tin content was 36 and the maximum 46 and the variation in the iron content was from 6 to 12 milli- grams per kilogram. These variations were independent of the weight of coating: on the container. RESULTS OF WORK 37 Average Tin Content of Products in Cans of Different Coating Weights at Specified Washington Inspections Washingt on Months Inspec- A B c D E p G Product PctClvCd Michigan Apples 1# I 61 65 1V1 llllgldiiio Jt-*^- 1 66 63 67 72 79 3/2 2 72 77 70 66 71 81 rvo 5/ 2 3 ^9 75 76 73 76 84 83 ny 4 74 89 78 75 69 70 74 9y 2 5 75 70 61 69 73 76 79 11 6 85 77 66 72 71 74 69 New York Apples... 2 1 114 163 178 164 168 165 178 4 2 157 173 168 168 176 167 192 6 3 164 177 176 167 180 180 198 8 4 158 163 188 161 193 179 207 10 5 172 174 183 181 164 181 190 ny 2 6 162 175 180 166 184 163 192 Pennsylvania Apples. 2 1 58 66 63 71 65 59 58 4 2 78 72 67 79 76 66 70 6 3 91 81 67 72 76 68 69 8 4 71 75 68 66 79 75 76 10 5 89 82 87 82 76 73 76 ny 2 6 77 84 64 78 81 90 76 String Beans 4 1 85 87 99 107 117 136 144 6 2 116 121 130 132 163 164 177 8 3 124 130 155 142 175 177 199 10 4 12'3 125 152 153 190 183 208 12 5 152 161 166 185 192 205 242 13^ 6 181 202 215 205 268 256 276 Cider • 1/2 1 81 78 69 75 73 85 88 sy 2 83 76 76 95 86 107 95 By 3 101 86 82 86 81 82 SO vy 4 128 100 100 101 98 114 107 9y 5 114 101 103 100 123 106 106 11 6 137 96 96 95 98 98 92 Clam Juice 2y ±y 1 2 17 20 ir 22 20 22 22 21 19 23 21 20 21 24 ey 3 22 26 24 25 27 25 29 sy 4 27 25 27 27 28 28 32 ioy 5 31 30 32 34 34 34 33 12 6 21 24 23 25 25 24 23 Illinois Corn 3 1 11 12 13 12 12 13 12 11 5 22 22 25 23 20 20 16 Indiana Corn 3 1 6 6 6 6 6 7 8 11 5 12 9 8 11 11 11 9 Maine Corn (side) . . . 2y 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 WA 5 7 7 6 7 12 7 8 38 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS Average Tin Content of Products in Cans of Different Coating Weights at Specified Washington Inspections — Continued Washing!' Dn Months Inspec- A B c D E F G Product Packed Condensed Milk 5 1 6 5 5 5 XVliUgl Jin 5 5 6 uy 2 6 12 14 14 22 14 21 18 Evaporated Milk.. 5 1 60 78 70 69 73 67 61 9 3 106 92 85 86 81 71 82 11 4 99 99 84 83 90 91 90 5 1 16 15 14 14 16 22 20 11 4 16 16 19 19 18 21 20 Illinois Pumpkin l/ 2 1 69 94 102 122 139 165 171 sy 2 2 134 194 235 251 254 303 309 5y 2 3 208 319 338 378 394 391 374 vy 2 4 283 376 394 444 437 459 511 9y 2 5 314 398 405 491 475 512 535 ii 6 334 461 510 546 620 666 664 Michigan Pumpkin. . . i/ 2 1 66 71 77 78 75 86 96 sy 2 2 107 122 142 145 155 152 203 sy 2 3 178 189 213 255 257 260 297 ?/ 4 188 213 260 292 288 283 363 9/ 5 208 222 268 275 294 345 381 ii 6 261 275 340 383 402 439 478 New York Pumpkin. 2 1 44 40 40 41 40 39 52 4 2 54 51 56 48 44 58 71 6 3 76 66 73 61 55 60 190 8 4 96 75 87 69 55 104 189 10 5 122 94 94 77 83 112 262 11^ 6 142. 122 142 116 100 139 319 Indiana Tomatoes. . . . 3 1 81 65 50 47 54 51 48 5 2 73 79 59 55 52 54 54 7 3 89 60 60 58 57 57 77 9 4 79 78 66 62 60 67 66 11 5 78 63 56 62 53 47 47 i2y 2 6 89 87 82 73 73 77 68 Maryland Tomatoes. . 3/ 1 61 56 55 54 50 63 19 5y 2 2 65 64 58 59 58 63 51 ny 2 3 72 73 71 62 61 60 68 9/ 4 85 76 71 65 67 65 64 11/ 5 70 69 64 60 62 66 46 13 6 91 88 82 81 75 69 70 New Jersey Tomatoes sy 2 1 56 59 55 50 71 63 45 sy 2 2 59 50 61 68 49 58 48 7y 2 3 75 76 63 64 59 58 53 9/ 4 79 61 61 69 60 57 57 ny 2 5 71 73 66 55 53 69 53 13 6 82 74 65 64 60 57 65 8/ 5 40 44 52 36 46 42 36 Tuna Fish 3 1 11 13 12 10 11 12 15 i2y 2 6 31 38 26 31 29 23 28 RESULTS OF WORK 39 Average Iron Content of Products in Cans of Different Coating Weights at Specified Washington Inspections w ashington Months Inspec- A B c D FJ p G Product Michigan Apples f '-LClvGCl Milligram! 9 l/ 2 1 9 1 9 JA.IKJ5I dill 7 8 6 3>4 2 12 6 6 5 6 5 6 sy 2 3 10 8 8 8 6 7 6 vy 4 8 i 6 6 8 6 7 $y 2 5 10 11 10 9 9 7 7 11 6 9 7 8 8 9 9 9 New York Apples... 2 1 S 8 7 7 5 6 5 4 2 9 6 5 5 6 5 5 6 3 8 7 8 7 6 5 5 8 4 7 7 IV 1 7 6 6 5 10 5 9 8 7 8 7 6 iiy 2 6 8 9 1 7 7 6 6 Pennsylvania Apples. 2 1 23 25 19 12 11 10 10 4 2 22 11 8 10 7 6 11 6 3 31 22 16 13 16 11 8 8 4 11 19 23 14 15 7 11 10 5 15 16 23 17 23 26 8 ny 2 6 15 20 18 17 9 11 10 String Beans 4 1 14 14 13 15 14 14 17 6 2 16 16 14 13 14 14 14 8 3 15 16 16 15 13 13 14 10 4 13 13 13 12 12 12 12 12 5" 16 15 15 15 14 14 15 13>< 6 16 18 16- 17 16 17 16 I/2 1 25 20 19 20 19 19 18 3/2 2 22 17 17 16 19 17 16 sy 2 3 29 24 23 22 22 22 21 iy 2 4 40 22 23 29 . 25 22 19 9/2 5 29 26 26 26 28 24 24 11 6 33 25 23 22 25 23 22 Clam Juice 2y 2 1 8 7 8 8 8 8 7 4=y 2 2 5 8 6 5 5 5 6 sy 2 3 7 7 6 6 6 6 7 sy 4 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ioy 2 5 7 5 7 7 6 6 6 12 6 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 Illinois Corn 3 1 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 11 5 8 9 7 7 10 7 7 Indiana Corn 3 1 10 11 10 10 9 9 9 11 5 14 14 16 12 12 12 11 Maine Corn (side) . . . 2y 2 1 8 8 7 8 7 8 8 ioy 2 5 14 13 13 13 10 11 11 40 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS Average Iron Content of Products in Cans of Different Coating Weights at Specified Washington Inspections — Continued Washington Product Months Inspec- A B c Milligrams D E Kilogram F G Jl £LCl£6Ci tion r N 5 1 3 2 3 2 4 2 2 uy 6 9 9 9 8 10 9 9 Evaporated Milk . . 5 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 9 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 11 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 1 34 31 30 27 26 28 33 11 4 29 25 24 23 24 21 25 1/2 1 20 20 20 19 20 21 20 \ 3/ 2 24 24 24 23 22 24 27 ■sy 2 3 22 22 23 23 23 22 23 7/ 4 23 25 25 22 23 23 23 9/ 5 22 22 21 22 21 21 21 ii 6 26 25 27 23 23 25 26 Michigan Pumpkin. . . 1/ 1 18 21 20 20 20 19 24 3/ 2 24 26 25 27 27 26 28 5/ 3 28 23 24 26 24 25 25 7/ 4 23 24 23 23 24 23 25 9/ 5 28 26 26 27 26 25 27 11 6 26 26 24 26 25 26 25 New York Pumpkin. 2 1 15 15 15 15 15 16 15 4 2 20 21 20 20 20 20 20 6 3 18 18 17 18 18 18 17 8 4 26 27 25 26 24 24 23 10 5 19 18 19 18 17 18 20 ny 2 6 21 22 21 22 19 20 20 Indiana Tomatoes. . . . 3 1 13 10 7 7 7 6 7 5 2 16 8 7 6 6 6 6 7 3 12 7 7 7 6 6 7 9 4 8 9 ' 7 8 7 7 6 11 5 13 8 8 7 8 7 7 12/ 6 i 7 7 6 6 6 6 Maryland Tomatoes . . 3/ 1 7 7 6 7 6 8 7 5/ 2 7 7 6 6 6 7 6 7/ 3 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 9/ 4 6 7 7 6 6 7 6 11/ 5 8 7 7 8 8 7 8 13 6 7 6 6 7 6 6 6 New Jersey Tomatoes 3 l / 2 1 8 9 12 8 9 9 8 5/ 2 8 8 7 8 I 7 6 7/ 3 9 8 7 7 7 8 6 9/ 4 9 8 7 7 7 7 7 11/ 5 10 10 10 11 8 10 8 13 6 9 8 7 7 8 8 7 . 8y 2 5 6 12 10 6 6 9 6 3 1 17 11 10 9 9 9 9 12/ 6 20 19 16 11 14 12 12 RESULTS OF WORK • — zz ^ 42 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS ^ A 3 RESULTS OF WORK 43 8. — Average Tin Content of Illinois, Michigan and New York Pumpkin A 3 CO £~r<3 A SCO £-/^G * BCOF^G A & C £> £~ ^ G A & C £> £~ f G A & C^f^G /Sr /AfiSfiTC77£W e/W>./A— * £ o H £ W H 1? O U H w u < > /77/lV 3 bo RESULTS OF WORK 45 GENESAL NOTE All the results which are reported in this investigation are based upon the original classifications of the plate into seven classes, as already de- scribed. Inasmuch as cans made from plate of any single class differ widely in their weight of coating, the objection might be made that the grouping should have been upon the basis of the analysis of the finished cans. This point has been fully considered. Maximum and minimum weights of coating in each class were correlated with the inspections and analytical results and it was found that the variation in the results within a single class was not caused by difference in coating weights. For ex- ample, in the reported discoloration in corn and pea cans, in twenty-five instances the maximum coated cans showed less discoloration than the minimum coated cans, in twenty-nine cases the maximum coated cans showed more discoloration, and in twenty-three they had been graded alike. EXTERIOR APPEARANCE OF THE CANS lustre of Cans A study was made of the influence of weight of coating on the lustre of tin plate. In this work there were used tin plate, empty cans, freshly filled and processed cans, and cans from the experimental pack, approximately one year old. A number of methods were employed, including a careful in- spection of plates and cans, singly and in groups, in different lights and from different angles and distances. Attempts were made to group plate, empty cans and filled cans on the basis of lustre. Groups of samples of known coating classification were also compared for lustre. In judging the results obtained and individual impressions gathered from the observations, many disturbing factors, such as unavoidable differences in surfacing or cold roll- ing the black plate and in cleaning the tin plate could not be eliminated or appraised. Tin plate designated as a certain grade is known to contain many in- dividual sheets or portions of sheets that belong to grades higher or lower. Therefore, opinions of value can come only from observation of so many samples that, notwithstanding many contradictions, the general tendency is unmistakable. Although it was not found possible to express in definite numerical values the sum total of all individual observations, the committee reached the following conclusion : Weight of tin coating is a factor which, with others, such as cold rolling of the steel sheets and cleaning of the tin plate, affects the lustre or gen- eral brightness of the cans. Generally, there is a gradual increase in the lustre of tin plate with increasing weight of coating from A to F, with a marked increase in lustre in the G coating. This is somewhat less appar- ent with new cans than with plate and much less apparent after the various treatments to which the cans are subjected in packing and storing. Close inspection and comparison of group samples will often reveal differences of lustre which are unobservable at a distance. For instance, close inspection may show differences between cans two grades apart, such as B and D or C and E, while inspection from a distance of ten feet or more may reveal only differences of four grades apart, such as B and F. It is apparent that degrees of lustre cannot be carried in mind and recognized without means for direct comparison. The committee has not the data to warrant an opinion as to the relative degree of lustre of large blocks of cans. Rusting 1 of Cans The tests used in the study of rusting were of three types : Repeated exposure of cold cans and plates to heated and humidified atmosphere. 46 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS Outside exposure under variable weather conditions in a manufac- turing district in Baltimore. Storage for about fifteen months in an unheated commercial ware- house in New York City. In this work the committee was unable to consider the influence on rusting of unavoidable differences in tin plate, such as variations in abrasion and in the amount of palm oil on the plate. The degree of rusting on each can and on each sheet of plate was ex- pressed numerically, upon a scale ranging from to 10. The plates or cans practically free from rust were graded 0, and those in each set showing the maximum rust were graded 10. From four to seven members of the com- mittee, individually graded each can and each sheet of plate. From a study of the figures so obtained, and as a result of the general impression of the committee, the following conclusions were reached : The amount of rusting gradually decreased with, increasing weight of coating. Under experimental conditions, where all the cans or plates showed some rust, those of the A grade were distinctly worse than those of the G grade. The decrease in quantity of rust, however, was gradual, and no sharp break between one coating and the next higher or lower was noticeable. It is difficult to give any definite idea of the extent of rusting in the different grades. Plates exposed out of doors in Baltimore showed a grad- uation from new bright for the G coating to a uniformly rusty surface for the A coating. This difference was especially striking when the plates were viewed from a distance. At the end of the test period the sets of cans exposed to artificial rusting conditions all looked rusty a short distance away, but those with the lighter coating were redder than those with the heavier coat- ings, and the G coating had often merely a yellowish appearance. Under identical conditions heavier coated plate will remain bright longer than plate having a lighter coating. On the other hand, variations in con- ditions which cause rusting might easily be sufficient to produce a marked amount of rust on G cans, while A cans subjected to less severe conditions, even in the same warehouse, would not be seriously affected. This fact was conclusively demonstrated by conditions in a single room in the New York warehouse where, in one stack of cans, the G cans in the tier nearest the window were quite rusty while the A cans three or four rows farther away showed but little rust. The work as a whole has shown that even the heav- iest coatings used in this investigation were not sufficient to protect the cans from rusting under poor storage conditions, and that under good storage conditions cans made of the lightest plate remained free from rust for a year. SUMMARY 47 SUMMARY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OP THE INVESTIGATION Because of a lack of information concerning the relative value of different weights of coating, on tin cans, a representative committee was formed to con- duct an investigation of the question. Tin plate was manufactured and made into cans of seven general classes carrying approximately the following amounts of tin per base box : A 0.90 pound B 1.10 pounds C 1.30 pounds D 1.50 pounds E 1.80 pounds F 2.10 pounds G 3.00 pounds These were made with both Bessemer and basic open-hearth steel, and seven duplicate lots of each weight of coating were made by using various combinations of four heats of each kind of steel and a number of tin pots. These cans were then shipped to different canning plants, where they were filled in the usual manner with representative food products and reshipped to Washington, Pittsburgh, and New York for inspection and analytical purposes. In all steps in the preparation of the plate and cans, and in packing the food, care was taken to obtain average conditions and to minimize the effect of vari- ables other than the weight of coating. Analyses and gelatine tests were made on representative sheets of each class. Preliminary inspections at the canning plants and six official inspections, em- bodying studies and analyses of the cans and contents, were made throughout a period of about eighteen months after filling the cans. Detail and average results of this work have been carefully tabulated, analyzed, and discussed. SUMMARY OP RESULTS Distribution of Tin Coating analyses showed that there is a wide variation in the amount of tin coating from box to box, as well as on different sheets in the same box, and even on different portions of the same sheet. These differences were emphasized by analyses of many cans made from the different classes of plate. Gelatine Test The gelatine test showed that the action of a plate subjected to this test is practically independent of its weight of coating. External Appearance of Cans See page 45. Apples Michigan and Nezu York — No difference was noted in the appearance of the cans made from plate of different coatings, except that in the G plate the crystals were more prominent. The contents showed slightly more iron as the weight of coating decreased, but the amount of tin in the contents did not vary with the weight of coating of the container, except that in New York apples the tin content was lower in A coating and higher in G coating than in B to F inclusive. Pennsylvania — The appearance of the cans and contents and the amount of tin in the apples were independent of the weight of coating. Cans made from all 48 TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS weights of coating perforated badly, though there were noticeably fewer perfora- tions in cans made from the heavier weights of coating. The iron content of the apples reflected this condition and was higher with the lighter coatings. String 1 Beans The discoloration and etching of the cans increased with the weight of coat- ing. There was a very notable increase in the amount of tin in the contents as the coating increased, it being 50 percent higher in the G plate than in the A. There was also an increase with storage. The iron in contents was inde- pendent of weight of coating. Cider There were fewer perforations in the cider cans than were expected and they were distributed through all classes of coating, being slightly less in the heavier coatings. There were no differences in appearance of cans or contents, except with the usual prominence of the tin crystals on the G plate. The tin content was independent of the weight of coating, and increased slightly with storage. There was a slight increase in iron with decrease in coating. Clam Juice The pack of clam juice did not develop the black discoloration which is some- times found in that product. At the sixth inspection a few traces of discoloration were found, but they were entirely independent of weight of coating. There was no relation between either the appearance of cans or the amount of tin or iron in contents, and the weight of coating. Corn Illinois — In the Illinois corn there was only a very slight formation of black discoloration, which was entirely unrelated to the weight of coating. In this pack, as well as in the Indiana and Maine packs, the intensity and size of the black spots diminished with age. Moreover, the tin and iron content of the corn was entirely negligible and independent of the weight of coating. Indiana — In all classes of cans there were many black spots, both in the con- tents and adhering to the cans, and although the number of these was slightly less with the heavier coated plate, nevertheless the black was so prevalent with all weights of coating as to be objectionable. Maine (On end) — Although the black in the cans took the form of a stain on and adjacent to the covers, nevertheless the conditions were much the same as in the Indiana pack. Maine (On side) — Conditions in this pack were similar to those in the pack of Indiana corn, except that the amount and intensity of the black were not related to the weight of coating. Milk (Condensed) Satisfactory results were obtained with all weights of coating and there was no rusting of the outside or etching of the inside of any can. The tin and iron contents of both this pack and the pack of evaporated milk were unrelated to the weight of coating. Milk (Evaporated) The contents and cans in all classes were normal and satisfactory. Feas All weights of coating showed the formation of areas of rust gradually changing to black and slowly disappearing with storage. These areas were ma- SUMMARY 49 terially greater with the lower weights of coating, although all weights were satisfactory. The tin and iron in contents were low and not related to the weight of coating. Pumpkin Illinois — The tin in the contents increased enormously with increase in both coating and age ; the tin content with . G plate being, at each inspection, about double that with A plate. The iron in the contents did not vary with the weight of coating. Except for a greater darkening in the A and B coatings, due to the removal of tin by the action of the product, and the prominence of tin crystals in the higher coatings, especially G, no other differences were observed. Michigan — The results of this pack were the same as with the Illinois pumpkin, except that the tin in the contents was generally lower. New York — Though the tin content was still lower, the results in this pack were much the same as those with the Michigan pumpkin. Tomatoes The three packs of tomatoes put up in Indiana, Maryland, and New Jersey gave practically the same results. The cans showed only the usual slight etching and darkening characteristic of tomato cans. This appearance was uniform throughout the different weights of coating. The amount of tin taken up by the contents was slightly higher in the lower weights of coating, but in practically all v cases was less than 100 milligrams per kilogram. The amount of iron in the contents was uniform throughout all weights of coating. Tuna Fish The appearance of the cans and the amount of tin and iron in contents were uniform throughout all weights of coating. Salmon Because of adherence of the fish skin to the can, a % satisfactory examination for black discoloration could not be made, but no distinction could be noted among the various coatings. The tin and iron in contents was independent of the weight of coating:. SO TIN COATING ON CANNED FOOD CONTAINERS CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC CONCLUSIONS Apples and Cider During one year of storage, practically no perforations were found in two of the three packs of apples, but an unusual number appeared in the third pack. This indicates that perforation depends very largely on the apples themselves, or on the method of packing. A different season or a change in the variety or nature of the apples packed at these plants might have given very different results. Where perforations occurred, they appeared later and to a lesser extent with progressively higher weights of coating, especially with plate carrying an average of 3 pounds of tin per base box, but were not eliminated by any weight of coating. The cider pack showed few perforations. In view of these facts, it is evident that the conclusions which can be drawn from the investigation on apples and cider are not clear cut and definite as is the case with all the other products studied. String- Beans All weights of coating were satisfactory but there was a tendency for tin - in the contents to increase with the weight of coating. Clam Juice All weights of coating were satisfactory. t Corn In one pack the amount of discoloration was negligible in all weights of coating. In the other two packs of corn, much discoloration occurred with all weights of coating. It is obvious that this discoloration cannot be eliminated by any particular weight of coating. Milk (Condensed) All weights of coating were satisfactory. Milk (Evaporated) All weights of coating were satisfactory. Peas All weights of coating were satisfactory. Pumpkin The heavier weights of coating gave unnecessarily high tin in the contents. In other respects all weights of coating were equally satisfactory. Tomatoes All weights ot coating were satisfactory. Tuna Pish All weights ot coating were satisfactory. Salmon All weights of coating were satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS 51 GENERAL CONCLUSION While the scope of the investigation was limited to the study of tin coatings, the use of several heats of Bessemer and open-hearth steel and duplicate tin pots warrants the belief that the plate studied was representative of that used in the canning industry. It is also believed that the foods studied are typical represen- tatives of the various classes of canned foods. As far as the exterior appearance of the cans is concerned, it is found that, other conditions being equal, lustre increases slightly and rusting decreases markedly with increasing weight of coating. The differences in lustre are still less noticeable after packing. The heaviest coating is not sufficient to prevent rusting under poor storage conditions, but, under good storage conditions, the lightest coating is sufficient. However, under some conditions, heavy coating is of decided value in minimizing rusting. The most significant fact established by this entire investigation is that, aside from the external appearance of the cans, none of the difficulties encountered in the twenty experimental packs of twelve representative foods in plain cans was taken care of or eliminated by heavy tin coatings. These difficulties arranged themselves in three groups : Perforation of cans in certain classes of foods. Unnecessarily large amounts of tin in contents of certain classes of foods. Discoloration of either cans or contents with many classes of foods. Although perforations, when they occurred, appeared later and to a lesser extent with progressively higher weights of coating, especially with plate carrying an average ot three pounds of tin per base box, nevertheless, they were not elimi- nated by any weight of coating, and no clean cut conclusion can be drawn as to the relationship between weight of coating and occurrence of perforations. The results obtained, however, show that research work on those products which have a tendency to perforate containers, and also on methods of packing such products, is imperative. Where large amounts of tin were found in certain products (string beans and pumpkin) the amount in the contents of the heavier coated cans was unnecessarily high. The results of the study of discoloration of contents and containers show con- clusively that difficulties of this nature are practically independent of the weights of coating studied. With some packs discoloration was found to a marked extent in all weights of coating, while with another pack of the same product no appre- ciable amount of discoloration occurred with any weight of coating. The lustre and the resistance to rusting increase somewhat with increased weight of coating. In other respects, with the exception of some instances in those classes of foods that have a tendency to perforate, the conclusion from this work is that the value of different weights of tin coating on food containers is for all practical purposes the same with average weights of from one to three pounds of tin per base box. Considering the plate used and the canning methods employed as representative of present day practice, and the foods studied as typical, it is believed that this conclusion is applicable generally. APPENDIX A APPENDIX A— ANALYSIS OF STEEL, WEIGHT OF COATING ON TIN PLATE, AND DISPOSITION OF SHEETS IN MAKING CANS CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF STEELS USED Marked Carb. Mang. Sul. Phos. Sil. Copper Bessemer : W 08 .44 .064 .116 . . . Trace X 11 .36 .037 .079 . . . Trace Y 14 .50 .076 .103 ... Trace Z 15 .57 .044 .095 ... .17 Open Hearth : W 11 .40 .045 .047 . . . Trace X 14 .38 .044 .078 . . . Trace Y 14 .46 .047 .080 . . . Trace Z 11 .44 .043 .065 ... .19 APPENDIX A Q < CO < W O M o w H do K ft o o .—I H < O O h O CQ H O i— i ^ I TJH • ^H I ^ CO • I CO -» • CN? I ?> it- CO • I O , O O O CT1 H Q !> , — ! « M « K CO J> i> H CO lO OO CO^H © Ci © © © o Oi ^ -a o pq j> -^ ^h I >0 N CO CO © 1C CNJ O -H O -H OC © © tH CO o CN> 03 CO 5 ' w ■^H -* I co lO O © -+< ?^ t> I CO *^ CO « « « O « CO CO t +1 i— I 2> CO O l O -rjH ^H © O -rH O t— I t— I O? © i>- © CO CO t- co w o) cj q ^ o O pq PQ i—i £ H -* I -* -* i ^ CO CQ ■ I lO ■^ CO 03 r- < © io ai lo co | «> « « « « © co ?> co co HH-^O O? CO ^ lO © © © © w pq APPENDIX A 2 O O (X, Q 2 < < S| c o O ci M 2> LO CO Q W CO CO « « ■^ «co « « HffiffiCOcO io io ^H -^ -* t-I CO CO -f o ZD Z£> ZD ZD ZO CO CO CO CO CO ^ o pq tH o o CO t— 1 I GO o -T O CO t-! i- I CO CO CO CO I O O CO O Q Ttf 00 -jl ^H -* "* -sfri C5 00 GO CO CO CO CO CO V o en -a H o H APPENDIX A co O Oh CO Q < CO < « O H * W o pq w ~ r-l GO S>- CO 00 CO OS CO CO 1—1 o i— I i— I rH 0>i CNJ CO CO CO CO CO ^ o pq ■^H ^H ^ ^H CNJ io ^H os lO CO i— I 00 CO GO 2> CO OS 03 on? c>3 CO CO CO o o -a w w f- CO !> O lO 2- 0NJ CO CQ ^H lO J> Q CO 00 CO CO N H H « (S -H CD CO lO CQ ?- ?> O ^H CO O r-j O T-H © ON? GNi C>i CQ ON* T-H ZD *HH O? >0 rt CO o o o o > 0? W « « IN i> o o o PQ fe ■^1 CO (?0» tH o LO C LO O CN>. 03 (73 GNJ OS GN2 CO JO xH C5 rt 0O CQ GNJ CN> CNJ O 2> CO OS co co co oj (73 C\> 03 CV o +-> en X) C W o H 02 a • • • • CO t— 1 • 1.5 • 03 • 1 LQ 1 <*> • • 00 CO CD • • • CO 15 • • CO • 00 -vH • • • 03 T— 1 T-H • • -CO |3 1 • CD ^»H CO . co . IS 1 CO Q 00 N • • • i—l i—l (Ji 1 ^ 1 r co tjh • • Hff! ■ • • JO CO • • • |2 . . . 1 : • • • • O* CO • • • • i— f 1 ^ • • • • 00 Q 1^ O tH « H (K (R CO CO CO 1 <= LOf"| t— 1 CO CO 1 CD 00 as oo io co oo co ■ HH fOCOHN 1 ct: 1 1 — co -xH co io i-l « « CO CO CD ^}H CO CO 03 CS C5 OS 00 2> O 10 10 « H (N O0 J> H 2> ?> O CO CO C5 O O O 2> CO CO CI OS Ol CCNOOJ 00OH1O CO Ci Ci CO Ci « « (N « CO CO CO CO Ol LO -^ H O W rH H ,— 1 tH ,— 1 CD O CO to to o © ■^ ^r ^ to ?o to ^ Ol H CO lO J> Ci Ci O O O O CO CO Tcfl -xH -^ ^H OJ lO t- C35 O i— 1 i— 1 i— ' ■^ ■"sH ^f tH ej o 4-> CO !>> O cr n C o o "en ■a a H en +-> o H J* O en >*. -a o pq cc; 4- c E- CJ O ■s O O < < i—i i—i CM CM £ £ £ £ ^ -^ c APPENDIX A O O Ph CO P < to « o H s ■o I— I 3 .s o o ! o i— i pq P £ < o PQ a o co co H < H H gK H co 3« H 2 S H O En O o z I— I H CO O OO O' «3 O ^H O O O T— I CO 2> CI H CO . f^ « « « CO CO > •<* ^ ^ ^h -* P* O PQ M a W PQ ■ ^ O '-O C3 "O OJH« CNJ CO co o KH «K N CO ««noo O Q Cl lO CO « « N CO CO lO ?> Cl H CO ^ ■00 2> s>- 00 O0 >► CO CO CO CO CO/ CO' O C3 CO ^fl CO GNJ t-H ^H CO T— ! O CO CO CO CO i~ — i- t- ?> o pq I o I CVI o H ^ W o I CM o h APPENDIX A i— i m ^r 3 £3 -2=hS fcc a * Un P5 O OS co c>3 *0 O O -rl t— I O COKlCO«(S« 03 E- to -M 2> 10 CO n O £■- «D ^ ^r 1 10 lo -^r 1 ^ 10 C- J> C3 i — CO O Q QO CO OS C5 05 ^ ^ ~-ft "^ "^H ^+* O -h ■* 03 -* ^H O t-H O "^T 1 "vH tJH £- © O Q OS « ^ t^ io CiH CO J> 00 co ■* tP -p ^4 o o +-> w Q i h> o 02 C2 io -rH o CQ CO o tH N co tH « CO CO CO CO « O ?> « CO « CD CO N OJ 00 GO 00 00 00 t— i i— ' i-l i— \ t-5 Z> £- OS i— I CO 2> to SO t~ 2> -* -f rf -r' ^ M 4-" o O PQ 1 1 © I O? GNi CO CO © (O00H i> -xH ^ £- s.-~ 00 IOHCO ©CO ^ -* TJH o o I o H APPENDIX A O Oh W Q < w <: « o l-H y a a o i— i pq < o pq O w M H < H S« Oh S H 2 S H O O o l-H H o o o c/3 H K O i— i C<1 c ^3 D, «2 So- ;-affl J s CO -^ O? 03 <* lO CO to w I 03 JO 03 04 CO Ci co jo co i— i ^r 1 H H « « COCO go co jo oa o jo CO i> -sH JO £- SO i-H O © O O S3 CO CO CO co co' co' J> 00 CO CO 03 i-H t— I i-H ^H i-H i—: CO co co co co co co o H o pq o I -H JO OS co JO o> o -H co O -H « ■* G>2 JO CO jo -^ co Ci « « JO CO CQ ^ ^ "^ co co co o o o H APPENDIX A < H" CO 3 ^h rH O 6^ &3 CO [ a 0> 0) & a ui a fcH d xsi n d CO 1-1 O =3 a J* O PQ ■ csi O H "nH oj CO co CO « CO « 2- O i> © rH O 03 GO -*H )uO CO J.-- CO CO o PQ pq X CCOQ CO CO CO c: (SCO O CO o IT CC CO © © CO CNJ 3 Q F-H ffl 1 — I >< o H 10 APPENDIX A z o i— i H H- 1 m O Ph CO t— i Q Q Z < H" w < w w o 2 •a H- < 3 H _C K c M o w 1 £ a pq i— i as h- 1 2 < C3 GO CO CO CO N CO lO 00 00 lO o 00 f>i> Q0 i> CQ G\J CQ CQ <>2 ! co o o C/j >-. o PQ U ■ -* -+l -f 1Q OS <> CO«OJ -^H <£> -* o -^ o CO CO CO 00 OS *■— S> £- CO ^ T3 U i i— i o -+i ci ci i — i >o CO C<2 ^fl rdH CD -^ O0 00 O ^H OS OS *0 ^H tJH tH ZD It- lO O OS OS O ZC oz a oi cv -r o pq Q X -^ ^ rh 02 CO OS o I <£> « CO CO H 2r- T+l -rH ^lOlO t)< lO CO , rt o o o >■ CO CO COf^ o o X o APPENDIX A , 11 53 O P < H < o I—l H o o w o £z CO H w s CO w B H fa o a i— i < O o fa o w H a i— i w £3 fcZ) A [xj C to O ci C „ Up oj 3 -^ -t J:- CO CO CO i— I CO CO ^ ■* CO 00 CO ^H CO CO HHNO t- O0 t> OO CO«HO i — i T — It — I 1 — I CO CO CO CO -a o m I 1—1 >< CO 2> CO ex? -H t- CO CO CO CO H « ^-tn ~*H co CO 00 CO CO ^H i—l ^H -H tH CO CO CO CO GNJ CO I CO . CO 1 o o I o rjH ^ CO . I CO CO f^ i> O GO O I CO O CO « TO O? CO i- CO O « lO « H O GO ^ OHOOH OJ 03 03 OJ cvj OOOOOH 03 O O i—l r-i Oi CZ C< o i T— I o Ci o cq « CO CO CO CO io CD « CO GOClO LO lO "* « « N -r -M o 12 APPENDIX A O Oh W O £* >H }*< W < P S h- 1 < < u H O 2 i— i r/3 w H < W H < C/J J W m ffi 2 H H ta (5 fe O o 2 HH H < O o fe o 00 H ffi a h-t w £ ri s &.S 42 H St! ■42 -a ffl Co f- a? O 3 02 PhW jS 00 10 -^ CO CO ^ tH CO CO CO CO i — )fl CT) to 1 — I O Q G5 Ol O 03 03 ©3 ©i CO* O CO CO ^H ©3 (N OJ « W « (3 O !D O © ^ ID o pq a x ^ 1 ^ ^ ^ owes ^H CO CO 0050 GOOH CO CO CO 03 2^ CO 10 -+< ^H ^) 00 05 05 Ol CD C5 CD^NOffltO tH t—I -i— I i—l © O "^ "^ "^1 ""n^ "^ "^ O I < CO £- CO tH ©i o -* co xH co co ©2 ©3 ©3 r- 1 2> CO Oi Ci CO CO CO O CO CO ©? CO lO lO CD ■^H "^t* -^1 xjH C +j S W < co >< -fei O APPENDIX A 13 r O 4) CD ^ OS OS CD ^ ^H 2>. O Oi o CS O COCiH?>cO0O OHHOO00 1— I 1—1 TH T— I 1—1 O Ci C5 CO CO C5 Oi CO CO W CO CO CO ^ o n CO >< ■^ -r -r CO C3 ^H CO C3 rH ^ Oi CO tH C^ CQ Cvj ,— I OOOiJ* s© -■+ t— i io 005 O O rjHCO^^ u o PQ co rJH 02 03 • O «H -CO CO i> CD O O C3 CO CO CO CNi i—l i-l i—l CO O O O C5 CO CO CO OJ O CNJ ^H 00 ?>- i> L— CD CO CO CO CO ^ o pq o I CO >< -* I tH tH ^ o o CO tH 10 o t— I 00 id o CO tH C\J CQ -V oo cxj xa O i— I CO 2> CO CO CO I?? -* CO 00 o 00 t> 2> CO CO CO CO CO — OS o o I o I CO >< c3 o 14 APPENDIX A S3 O co O Ph W3 o o w PQ Q < o PQ fi o fa o o i— ( H < O cj o CO H E O i— i w fi H 2 ho P.* oj 5 CO 00 cs co os os "^ ^ "^ ^H CO CO CO -tH ^ co tH -xH 10 10 1Q10 ^ o PQ p CO >< ^H <* -r ^ I ^ ^ I -* JO Oi CO C3 CO JO • 00 OS cq ! • co O £~ Z- Tf 1 CO < i> CO CO. tH o J^ JO O OS •^ OS 0C 03 CO CQ CD CQ Z> CO 00 CO -^ Oi O CO CO O? CO C3 JO JO JO JO CO CO 2> CO CO CO ooo^ co CO co JO JO JO o PQ w X o H Id c w CO o APPENDIX A 15 2 O O Ph Q Z < H w i— i H O O w pq P S< < o H pq O to O o I— I H < O o Eh o oo H- K O i— i m &* " »5 cS S <» O 3 tc ops kffl £> CO lO t+I -^ CO CO « CO H O OS ^H OS CO 03 i— I r- 1 O i-H o © CQ Cvj 05 03 C O0 O CO (S cs © © os © rri ira ia tH m u o o PQ CO >< ^H I -+ -H I -H 2> CO CO t- co tH i os CO CO CO © « HO0 i—l © i— i O CO CO i—l i—l ^H lO lO o r!4 w I I CO >< co -H C3 C4 OS 2> co lO CO cs w CO ^ -*+< ^H CO O CS 2> «-««o © © i-j tH CO CO CO CO ?> OS O i— I CS CS CS CS to o o to cs CD o o o PQ I O CO >< o H tJH -tf •^ rtf tO ^jH CO O co co co CS CS lO O O OS CO OS O to co o T3 a w I o I CO o H 16 APPENDIX A O O Ph Q < H < « o I— I H O »— i W PQ 5< < o PQ O H W tn H K Ph o o 2; i— c H < O o o GO H O I— ( £ d S-H tap.* <3j C V o 3 w Pnpq w -t-> n O CTS CO OS *0 ^ ^ N OJ ?> io ?o CO H CO ^ W H H COW CO ?3 CO N H CO oi as as os go 00 ffio H O tH tH O o O PQ i l < -^ -^ ^H 1 ^ CO C3 o t-MO CO ^H tJH CO ^H 2> CO CN? CO CO CO CO 2> CO OS C3 CNJ CXJ o o m w -H -H 1C CO C co CO CO CO CO o o PQ I T-H I •V -H -f CNJ CO CO o ?> OS CO CO W CO ^ os co O tH CO HHCO -a m T-H I o APPENDIX A 17 53 O co O GO P < CO < o H K O i— i H O ^ « w < Q § o 0) •r-J 0> « *? EH fi ,-H o d| £^ m K +j 0) 5 X ■s a 02 g t! «=> O oj £! +J Co, 0) S ri o-2 JS s £ -H 2^ Oi CO -H iH ©3 CO CO 1— I o> CO o CO CO CO -HI « m « « 2> GO ?> Ci ^ o • +-> o f-H O r-l > -f -T< 2H CO ©3 i-i CO xjH -H -H -H xH ©3 ?£> 00 CO ©i o J> SO ©3 « co co CO CO -Hf (DHO W CO CO CO GO O i—l CO CO (J o w o Hod oo co co co xH ©3 00 2> O K OS CO 05 OHIOH « H Q 00 O O CS C3 CO CO «« co co « r-l i— I CO (D CO 00 xn xH H O pq o o o o 18 APPENDIX A 00 O 00 P < H oo < fa fa u t— i H K a fa w J ffl tH m co ^ ^H 00 ?> J>« Oi CO 2-- CQ t- QO OO O0 lO CO N CO « N « « CO CO CO CO -H -H -f< -f 4 ^ O PQ W CO go co ^ -f ^H -t ?> Cft tH OIHO 2^ CO CO OHN CO CO CO CO CO CO T3 I T— ( UO OS CO G C\J ^ O PQ o H G I I o APPENDIX A 19 0,5 5,5 cS 5 a> o 3 to QOli I O Oi CS col «« ^H C5 l-i 00 HH-sflH O O CO »o 00 00«ffl C5 O O O c o3 to O ° °3 ftffl c -* 03 00 C3 r- 1 ■* OS lO GNi CO tH «H«COKl OS CO CO lO £- 7-i o o io 7— I 7- 1 7—1 O O 00 00 OS OS OS "^Jl ^ji ^^T* ""n" "^F rX o pq PQ -^ TH -T< -H OOOOilC tO GOCO t- O O rH O 03 00 Oi ■^jH ^H TjH "HH M -$ -f ^ <* CO P3 ^ CO (35 too o « TfH Tfl tH O 03 CO CO CO CO O 00 «£> O 02 rt i> £- i> CO 00 >■ ^ "^ xf* ^ "^ r"** ^ o H ffl u 4- I -f -H -H ^* o 7-1 ^ OS CO CO CO « CO CO CO TJH lO CO CO OJ -*50« (OtOl^ "^sH ^f ^H o ^ 03 o APPENDIX A 21 Q < H" < w o H o o go I— I >* W M < < o M fi O 00 H H 00 H _ H 1-1 r H o fa o o H < O o fa o w H X a i— i w 3°^ 0> hi) a x oS C a> O 3 to PmPQ -H CJ5 ICs CO CNJ tH 2> lO CO C5 © -+! XT'. CO CO C^ CO 00 CO cq a OS cTi 1T3 ^ -* ^ 2> CS -i— I CO lO ^ >o >o 1Q >Q O lO ^ o -H "* -H o N o Q I CO CO ^H O O CO it- CO ^H ^ xH lO 2> i— I ^H ^H xJH «J 1Q lO ^4 th -H -+i -h 2> 2> C- -rfH SO ^ CO ^ CO o o Ol Oi lO 05 R « i> 2> CO CO H CO CO »o CO COKK iO id io 1Q ^ o pq CO CO o CO CO ^H O 2> 2> CO t-<> 2> OS i— I T-i r-l C2 i— i PQ < PS 5 < CO CO CO CO 00 ^ CO os co no O O T-j oi oi o? HCOIQ o o o O lO 1Q CJ O +-> en oa I -H co -rH -* i> 2> 03 03 « CQ N -^ CO OS 00 lO GO -i—l os co io co i— O i—i i— I O r- 1 co' CO co' co' CO CO OS -* CO o o o o o o o co co co co o o -(-J >■> o PQ o I ■<*■ -* I *tf i—l Z>- CO £- i> CO CO CO i—l w oo a io co os CQ (SO CO OS o O O lO co o co O H o >< O APPENDIX A 23 1 1 +J o <1) 01 P5 ri JT3 Eh a rH O .g O^ £3 m CD O v x m g "H <=> o N c o S e OJ cS O 02 M M c \ a o3 02 IM a ri 02 H, o c8 B « a H CO CO H (N Oi (TO H 03 HC350o>OtOHW CSC5GS00CTSOS0000 C0^1O(0!>Q0ffiO tHt— Ii-HtHtHt— It— l(T\J ^ o PQ N ^H ^ ^ ^H C» ?> O CQ CO CO CO CO "^ Hrl O CO !> O "3 t- 00 IO <^> OS "^ CO 00 GO 00 00 00 H R CO r)(lO (2 W CO W CO M CO o o IX! W I < ■ r- ( N CQ ^ -H « W C5 <7- CS 00 CTS CO H H H CO CO ^H tH CO O « C5 tP^ — I t^H CO t^i CO LO 2> CNJ t-i 03 !* CO N co OJ ^ O CO tJH CO O co CO <^> CD ^ O O 1 T— I I N -* -H xH tH c — CO >C cq O W o) CO O? CQ CO CO "nT 1 CO 2>- £- 2> i-l CO oo CO CI C5 C3 H H 53 to 04 -r lO 00 03 CO © oo to 2>- CO CO CO CO i> -^ O? tO CO^NO lO lO lO lO OJ>i>J> CO 02 Oi C<* tH -* I ^ ^ I ^H t- CO CO o Q 1—1 I N 00 S> t— I CO CO -^ 00 CO CO 00 "O 00 iO ^H ^H oo to CO 2:- 2> 00 « « « o o N -* to tH ^i as CO CQ -H CQ « CO CO CO io to to ^H 00 2>- O to r-i lO 2>- 00 J> 00 fc- tO 2> CO tH IO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO X) o pq I w I 1— ( N -H ^ 03 CO C<2 o o O? CO CO CO « tJH tH O tJH CO Z> CO OO 00 00 GO Oi O CO CO "xH CO CO CO o o I N 26 APPENDIX A O to X/i O O 1-1 I go ffl < s< < o pq g O 00 H < W H < VI h-1 H to ffi 2 H i— t H to O to O ,-TS H o,3 0> b£CX g3 C oj hoc! -r< co era co -^ eo t— i cr> CO CO CO CO CO O CO'* 03 o CD O Z> CO t— I © o © © © c cci CO O? CO r^ lO n N N « « OJ « « « N M o PQ to N APPENDIX B APPENDIX B— DETAILS OF PACKING MICHIGAN APPLES— Packed October 26, 1915 The apples used in this pack were of several varieties. They were machine peeled and hand trimmed, being kept in slightly salt water during these operations to prevent surface darkening. The cans were filled by hand without reference to weight. Boiling water was added until the can? were completely full and they were then passed through a wet exhausf box, giving approximately one minute exhaust. The process was 7 min utes at 212° F. The baskets of cans were carried by a conveyor through a tank of water for cooling. Although the cooling was irregular, all cans were well cooled. NEW YORK APPLES— Packed October 8, 1915 The apples were nearly all large, sound Greenings. They were machine peeled and hand trimmed. The cans were partially filled in a string bean shaker. The packing was completed by hand, each can being weighed. After the addition of boiling water the cans were passed through an exhaust box containing no steam. This consumed 4*/2 minutes and allowed some cooling of the contents before the cans were closed. The cans were processed 6 minutes at 212° and were well cooled. PENNSYLVANIA APPLES— Packed October 5 and 6, 1915 The apples were of several varieties and were mostly "windfalls" with many defects — worm holes and immature fruit being common. The fruit was machine peeled, allowed to fall into a tank containing salt water, and cut and trimmed by hand. The cans were hand filled without regard to weight and boiling water was added to completely fill the interstices. The process was 5 minutes at 212° F. The cooling was very irregular, but most of the cans were cooled to approximately 140° F. Difficulties in closing the cans delayed the packing on October 5, so it was necessary to pack part of Y-l and all of the Y-4 and Z-l lots on October 6. The packing on the first day was frequently interrupted, but all possible care was taken to fill and close the cans under the same conditions. STRING BEANS— Packed August 10, 1915 Refugee beans (No. 2) were blanched about 2 minutes in boiling water, air cooled approximately 4 minutes and then sprinkled with water. The cans were hand filled to contain 13 ounces and brined with a hot solution of 18 pounds of salt per 100 gallons. The process was 20 minutes at 236° F. Seven to eight minutes was required to reach this temperature and four to five minutes used in relieving the pressure. The baskets of cans were cooled for 25 minutes in a traveling conveyor tank system. CIDER— Packed October 26, 1915 Cider freshly pressed from fairly whole stock was emptied from bar- rels into steam jacketed copper kettles, heated just to the simmering point about y 2 inch from the top of the can. The cans were closed, processed 5 minutes at 212° F. and well cooled, minutes at 212° F. and well cooled. CLAM JUICE— Packed September 16, 1915 The fresh live clams were placed in trays holding about a bushel and washed thoroughly with cold water. Five of these trays were then placed 27 28 APPENDIX B in a wooden steam tank with an aluminum bottom and steamed 5 minutes at about 1 pound pressure. They were allowed to remain in the tank approximately 5 minutes longer, while the heat was gradually lowered. The juice was conveyed into a galvanized iron tank through a galvanized iron pipe about 40 feet long. It was then poured by hand into a container and filtered through cotton into an aluminum kettle, where it was heated to approximately 180° F. The cans were filled from this kettle with a hose. The. process was 20 minutes at 240° F., followed by air cooling of the cans with the process end up. ILLINOIS CORN— Packed September 1, 1915 The Country Gentleman corn used was slightly green, but of fancy quality. The corn was husked by hand, sorted and trimmed. The ears were given a single cut and the cobs scraped fairly clean. After silking, the corn passed to a Cuykendall mixer and cooker, where a brine was added. The brine consisted of 87 pounds of sugar, 13 pounds of salt and 85 gal- lons of water. The average temperature of the corn when filled into the cans was about 188° F. The cans were processed 80 minutes at from 250° to 252° F. and cooled on a traveling belt in a spray of cold water. The cooling was irregular, although the cans were fairly well cooled. INDIANA CORN— Packed September 8, 1915 The corn was of. the Evergreen variety. The corn was husked, sorted, trimmed, cut, and silked according to the regular practice. From the silk- ers the corn passed to the mixing tank, where brine was added. The brine consisted of 20 pounds of salt and 30 pounds of sugar per 100 gallons. The mixture was heated to 190° F. in a Merrell Soule cooker and was then filled into the cans. The fill was very uniform, the contents coming close to the top of the can. The process was 70 minutes at from 248° to 256° F., these figures representing the widest variation. The cans were spray cooled in a retort, but, as a general rule, were quite hot when stored. MAINE CORN— Packed September 14, 1915 The variety of corn was early Crosby. It was husked, sorted, and trimmed according to the regular factory practice. The corn was cut quite deeply and scraped very lightly because the cobs were tender. Cold brine was added to the corn after silking. The mixture was stirred for about 2 minutes, poured into a Merrell Soule four-pocket cooker, heated to 190° F. and filled into the cans. The cans were processed 60 minutes at 248° F. The trays of cans were very slightly cooled by immersion in water and allowed to stand out of doors until the following day. The trays contain- ing the cans with the process end up were inclined at an angle of approxi- mately 20°, so that the corn was in contact with part of the upper shoulder and end of the can. CONDENSED MILK— Packed July 8, 1915 This product was prepared and packed according to the regular fac- tory practice. Sugar was dissolved in warmed milk, the mixture transferred to the vacuum pan, concentrated, cooled to approximately 60° F., and filled into sterilized cans. The product was not processed. The product was held at the plant in cold storage, 45° F., for several months. It was removed from storage on an especially humid day and shipped to the various laboratories. EVAPORATED MILK— Packed July 8, 1915 The milk was concentrated in a vacuum pan, cooled, homogenized, and filled into the cans. The cans were processed under pressure in a revolving APPENDIX B 29 retort and cooled by water spray before removal. The storage and ship- ment of these cans was identical with that of the condensed milk. PEAS— Packed July 6, 1915 The peas (No. 3) were blanched by hand from 15 to 20 minutes in wire baskets and were then cooled by spraying with cold water. The cans were filled and brined in the usual way. The brine consisted of 15 pounds of salt and 40 pounds of sugar in 100 gallons of water. The process was 35 minutes at 240° F., 7 to 8 minutes being required to bring the retort up to temperature and 4 or 5 minutes being required for relieving the pressure. The cooling procedure was identical with that followed with string beans and the cans were likewise practically cold when removed from the baskets. ILLINOIS PUMPKIN— Packed October 20, 1915 The pumpkins were sorted for ripeness, washed in a tumbling cleated washer and slit in half for inspection. They were then passed to an automatic cutter, after which the seeds were removed. The pieces were steamed in a tower for 45 minutes. A slatted moving belt, permitting considerable drainage, conveyed the material from the steam tower to a cyclone which removed the skins and shreds. The product was then heated for a few minutes under high steam pressure in a specially designed cooker and filled into the cans at a temperature of about 200° F. The cans were well filled and sealed immediately. The process was 50 minutes at 250° F., after which the cans were well cooled. MICHIGAN PUMPKIN— Packed October 25, 1915 The pumpkins were sorted, trimmed, and washed in large wooden tanks. They were then transferred to a dicer, which cut the pumpkins into pieces about 3 inches square. From the dicer, the pieces were fed into a rotating hopper to remove the seeds and seed fibers. They were then packed into baskets and steamed in the retort at a temperature of 240° F. for 30 min- utes. The product was pressed to remove a portion of the liquid and was then cycloned. The cans were fairly well filled, although not as full as the Illinois pumpkin. They were exhausted for 1^2 minutes and sealed promptly. The temperature of the contents at the time of closing was lower than that of the Illinois pumpkin. The process given was 50 minutes "at 240° F., after which the cans were well cooled. NEW YORK PUMPKIN— Packed October 9, 1915 The pumpkins were carefully trimmed, slitted in half, and conveyed to towers, where they were steamed for 45 minutes. After steaming, the mate- rial was drawn from the bottom of the tanks into baskets, which allowed considerable draining. The amount of water draining out determined the final consistency of the product. To each crate of steamed material a small estimated quantity of salt was added. This mixture was shovelled into a cyclone", which removed the seeds and fibers, and the pulp was then passed to a corn cooker and heated to approximately 190° F. After filling and closing the cans were processed 60 minutes at 240° F. The cans were cooled by immersion for 45 minutes in a tank of cold water and were practically cold when removed. INDIANA TOMATOES— Packed September 7, 1915 The tomatoes of varying degrees of ripeness were sorted, washed, scalded, hand peeled, and packed without the addition of salt. As a rule, the cans were very solidly packed. After filling, the cans were exhausted 30 APPENDIX B 3 minutes in a steam exhaust box. They were then immediately sealed and processed about 23 minutes at 235° to 238° F. After processing, the cans were sprayed with cold water for a few minutes and were quite warm when stored. MARYLAND TOMATOES— Packed August 26, 1915 The tomatoes showed a tendency to greenness and were rather small in size. They were well washed, scalded, and hand peeled. The cans were filled with solid tomatoes as full as possible. Each can was tested on a scale against a check can filled as full as possible with solid tomatoes. The cans were then flooded with screened juice (seeds removed), which was taken from the filling tables. They were exhausted for three minutes and sealed immediately. The process was 20 minutes at 220° F., after which the cans were fairly well cooled. NEW JERSEY TOMATOES— Packed August 24, 1915 The tomatoes were fully ripe. They were washed, sprayed, and scalded according to the regular practice at this plant. The cans were well filled without regard to weight, no juice being added. They were exhausted for 2^2 minutes in a steam box and sealed promptly. The process was 35 min- utes in an open bath without cooling. Immediately after processing the cans were stacked and stored on their sides. TUNA FISH— Packed" September 20, 1915 The fish lay on the deck of the boat and were exposed to sunlight until evening, when they were cleaned and the heads chopped off. At the can- nery they were washed with cold water and placed in pans with wire bot- toms. The pans were put' into iron racks on wheels, with a distance of about six inches between pans. They were then placed in a retort, cooked two and a half hours at a steam pressure of five pounds (227°), allowed to cool until the next morning and then cleaned ; that is, the bones, skins, and dark meat were removed. Small quantities of cotton-seed oil and salt were put in the cans and the fish packed in by hand. They were exhausted 7% minutes at 210° F., promptly sealed and processed 55 minutes at 240° F. After processing, the cans were washed and allowed to cool in the air. SALMON— Packed November 15, 1915 The cold prepared fish were filled into the cans, exhausted 9 minutes, sealed and cooked 80 minutes at 240° F. After processing, the cans were washed in a lye solution and rinsed in cold water. APPENDIX C APPENDIX C— METHODS OF ANALYSIS METHOD OF DETERMINING TIN IN CONTENTS The tin in contents was determined by the Baker volumetric method which has been tentatively adopted by the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. This method is described in the Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Volume II (1916), No. 2, page 173. METHOD OF DETERMINING IRON IN CONTENTS The iron in contents was determined by the thio-cyanate colorometric method of Thomson (J. C. S., 1885, 493 ; Sutton, Volumetric Analysis, 10th edition, page 239). The samples for this determination were prepared in the following manner : Transfer the filtrate from the determination of tin to a beaker, make alkaline with ammonium hydroxid, and add 5 cc of ammonium sulphid. Heat the solution below the boiling point on a hot plate until the iron sulphid coagulates and settles to the bottom. Separate the precipitate by nitration and wash on filter paper with cold water containing 15 or 20 cc of ammonium sulphid per liter. When the wash water has stopped dripping, place the funnel with filter paper on a graduated flask and leave exposed to the air for several hours to permit the oxidation of the precipitate. Dissolve the iron through the filter in the graduated flask with hot 1-4 hydrochloric acid and thoroughly wash the filter with hot water. Dilute this solution to volume and determine the amount of iron in an aliquot portion by the method given above. If the solution in the graduated flask is colored so as to interfere with the colorometric determination of iron, it is transferred to a porcelain dish, evaporated to dryness, ignited to destroy organic matter, and the residue dissolved by digesting in dilute hydrochloric acid and again transferring to the graduated flask. This discoloration often occurs with meat and fish, and with such products it is often more convenient to ignite the filter paper and precipitated iron in a porcelain dish instead of dissolving through the paper with hydrochloric acid. METHOD OF DETERMINING TIN ON TIN PLATE Loosely fold a piece of the plate under examination with an area of four square inches and introduce it into a 300 cc Erlenmeyer flask with from 50 to 100 cc of concentrated hydrochloric acid and determine the amount of tin by the method above referred to for the determination of tin in contents, using, however, an iodin solution of such strength that, with the size of sample employed, 10 cc is equivalent to one pound of tin per base box. For the preparation of the standard iodin solution, dissolve 45 grams of iodin and 65 grams of potassium iodid in a small amount of water and dilute the solution to four liters. After allowing to stand over night, check the strength of this solu- tion against solutions containing a known amount of tin and an amount of iron equivalent to that used in a sample, and dilute the iodin solution to such strength that each cubic centimeter is equivalent to 0.005786 grams tin. In this work, sam- ples of tin plate of four square inches were cut out by means of a die press con- structed especially for this investigation. PROCEDURE IN MAKING GELATINE TEST The gelatine test for this work was made in accordance with the procedure outlined in the following directions : 1. Clean the plates thoroughly with soft cotton saturated with petroleum ether. 31 32 APPENDIX C 2. Use a tinners' brake to turn up vertically about one-half inch of the edges of the plate and, after bending in the corners, make sure that the pans so formed lie perfectly flat. 3. Make up the gelatine solution so that each liter will contain : 250 grams Medium-Grade Gelatine which has been tested and found practically neutral in reaction and free from reducing agents. (If the solution made with this amount and poured at a temperature of 38° C. (100° F.) will not set in 10 to 15 minutes in a room at about 24° C. (75° F.), use a slightly greater quantity. 15 cc. 10% Solution of Potassium Ferricyanide. 1 cc. 1.20 sp. gr. Hydrochloric Acid, C. P. 25 cc. Glycerine, C. P. .5 cc. Chloroform. 4. In making up this mixture first soak the gelatine for about an hour in one-half the water and then add the remainder of the water (hot) to bring it to volume. In all operations carefully avoid any contamination of the solution with iron. As it may turn green on prolonged standing, the ferricyanide should not be added until the gelatine is about to be poured on the sheets. 5. Thoroughly mix all of the solution and bring it to a temperature between 38° and 41° C. (100° and 105° F.) 6. After placing, on a flat surface, each of the pans made from the plate to be tested, pour into them a uniform volume of the gelatine solution. 7. After pouring allow the plates to remain in place until the gelatine has set. This should take from about 10 to 15 minutes. Success has not been realized when using solutions where the gelatine sets up in less than 7 or 8 minutes, since these result in media which are too stiff to permit of sufficient diffusion of the blue formed at the pin holes. 8. Allow all the plates to stand in a closed room until ready for grading. (Localized drafts cause the surfaces to dry out and thereby vary the conditions of the test). Note : — The most important point to be observed in making these tests is that, no matter how carefully the various solutions have been made up, tests made with different batches of gelatine solution must not be compared with each other. The test is only of value when sheets that have been flowed with the same gelatine solution, with all conditions constant, are compared at the same time. APPENDIX D APPENDIX D— RESULTS OF GELATINE TEST INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BESSEMER PLATES, GELATINE TEST— LOT W-l Hours Elapsed Before Marking B.D. D.M.B. -Individual Markin F.P.F. W.D.C. Average Aver. Mark Grade gs W.D.B. w.s.s. A 12 36 6 5 7 4/ 6 4/ 7 4/ 5 5 7 4>4 6/ 4/ sy 2 12 36 ±y 2 4/ 2 7 4/ 5 4 6 4/ 6 4 6 4 oy 2 4 ±y 2 B 12 36 4 o O 3 4 3 4 3/ 3 5 3 4 3 vy 2 12 36 3 4 4 4 4^ 3/ 5 4 5 3/ 5 4 4/ 4 4 C 12 36 6 4/ 6 5 6 4 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 4^ 5 D 12 36 3 4 4^4 3/2 4 3 5 3/ 4 zy 2 5 3/ 4 3/ 3/2 12 36 3 6 ±y 2 6 4 5/ 5 6 4 5 5 5 4 oy 2 5 E 12 36 2 2 2 I/2 2 1/2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 36 6 5 5 4^4 6 3/ 5 5 5 3/ 2 6 4 5/ 4 4 T /1 F 12 36 ey 2 3 6/ 3 6 6 3/ 6 3 7 3 6/ 3 4/ 12 36 4 4/ 4 4/ 5 5 4 4/ 4 5 5 5 4>< 4/ 4/2 G 12 36 W 2 3/2 5 3/ 7 3/ 7 4 4/ 3/ 7 4 6 3/ 4/ 12 36 7 5 8 W2 8 5 7 5 7 5 8 5 7/ 5 6 Note. — Duplicate sheets were tested whenever possible and a record was made of each sheet after 12 hours', and also after 36 hours' standing. 33 34 APPENDIX D INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BESSEMER PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT W-2 Hours Elapsed , Individual Markings s Aver. Grade Before Marking- B.D. D.M.B. P.F.F. W.D.C. W.D.B. W.S.S. Average Mark A 12 2 3 2 3 3 3 2j/ 2 36 3 2y 2 2 3 3 3 2*/ 2 2*/ 2 12 hy 2 6 3^ 4 5 4 4^ 36 4 4444444 B 12 4 6 2>y 2 5 4 4 4^ 36 4 4 3>4 4 3^ 4 4 4 C 12 5 6 %y 2 . 6 5 4 5 36 4 4 4 4 4^ 4 4 4^ 12 4 3 2^ 4 3 2 3 36 2y 2 2y 2 2 3 3 3 2y 2 2y 2 D 12 7 7 6 8 7 5 %y 2 36 5 5 5y 2 $y 2 ±y 2 5 5 5>4 12 2>4 4 2^ 3 3 3 3 36 3 2y 2 2 2y 2 2y 2 3 2>4 2^ E 12 8 7 7 8 8 6y 2 7^ 36 6^ 7 6 7 5 6 6 6y 2 12 6>4 6 7 8 7 %y 2 7 36 6 4^ 4>4 5 3^ 4>4 4^ 5^ F 12 1222222 36 \y 2 \y 2 iy 2 . 2 2 2 2 2 12 5 4 5 5 4 4 4>4 36 4 3 3^ 3^ 4 4 3J^ 4 G 12 6^ 6 6>4 6 6 6 6 36 5 V/ 2 5 4^ 5 5 5 5*/, APPENDIX D 35 INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BESSEMER PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT X-l Hours Elapsed Before Marking -Individual Marking F.F.F. W.D.C. Average Grade B.D. D.M.B. W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A 12 36 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 4^ 5 4^ 5 4 ±y ±y ±y 12 36 ±y 2 4 5 5 4^ 4 6 4^ 5 5 5 4 5 4^ ±y B 12 36 4 4^ 5 4 4>4 4 5 4^ . 5 ±y 2 4 4 4>4 4 4 12 36 4^ 4 4 4 4>4 4 5 5 5 4 4 3>4 4^ 4 4 C 12 36 4 4 4 4 4^ 4 6 4 5 4 3^ 3}4 4^ 4 4 12 36 5y 2 6 5 5 5 6 5 5>4 5 3 4 5 4^ 1^ D 12 36 5 ±y 2 5 4^ 4^ 4 5 4 5 zy 2 4 4 4^ 4 4 12 36 3 sy 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 3^ 3>< 3 3 E 12 36 5 4 5 4 4^ 3^ 5 4 5 - 3 5 4 5 sy 4 12 36 $y 5 6 4>4 4>4 3^ 5^ 4>4 sy sy 4 4- 5 4. 4^ F 12 36 sy 4 5 3J^ 4>^ 3^ 7 4^ 6 4 4 4 5^ 4 4^ 12 36 3 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 3 3 2 2 2y 2 2 2 G 12 36 sy 2 sy 2 8 7 9 7 8^ 5^ 7^ 7 8 7 8 6}4 7 12 36 sy 6 8 7 9 7 9 6 8 6^ 9 7 8^ ey *# 36 APPENDIX D INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BESSEMER PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT X-3 Hours Elapsed Before Marking- B.D. D.M.B. -Individual Marking F.F.F. W.D.C. Average Aver. Grade W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A 12 36 4 4/ 5 4 4 4 5 4/ 4' 5 5 3/ 4/ 4 4 12 36 4/ 4 5 4/ 4 4 4/ 4/ 2 4/ 4/ 4 3/ 4/ 4 4 B 12 36 4/ 4/ 5 4/ 4/ 4 5 5 5 4/ 5 4 4r.y 2 ^2 12 36 5 4 5 4/ 4 4/ 4/ 4 5 4 5 3/ 4/ 5 4/ C 12 36 5/ 5 6 5 4/ 5/ 7 4/ 5 6 5 6 5/ 5/ 5 12 36 4/ 4 5 4 4 3/ 4 4 5 4 4 4 4/ 4 4 D 12 36 5 5 6 5 5/ 5 T / 2 6 4/ 5/ 4/ 5 4/ 5/ 5 5 12 36 4/ 5 5 4/ 5 4 5 4/ 5 4 5 4/ 5 4/ 4/ E 12 36 sy 4 3 3/ 3 3 4 . 4 4 3 4 3/ 3/ 3/ 2 3/ 12 36 4 4 3/ 3/ 4 3 5 4/ 4/ 3 4 3/ 4 3/ 3/ F 12 36 4 4/ 4 4 3/ 4 5 4 4/ 5 4 4 4 4 4 12 36 3 sy 3 3/2 3 3 5 4 3/ 4 3 3 3/ 2>y 2 3^ 12 APPENDIX D 37 INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BESSEMER PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT Y-l Hours Elapsed Before Marking B.D. D.M.B. -Individual Markin F.F.F. W.D.C. Average Aver. Grade W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A 12 5 6 4 5 5 5 5 36 ±y 2 5 4 4^ 5/ 4/ 4/ 4/ 12 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 36 4/ 4/ 4 4^ 5 4>4 4/ 4/2 B 12 36 4/ 4/ 5 4/ 4 4 5 4^ 4/ 4 4 4 4/ 4 4 C 12 36 4/ 4/ 5 4 4 4 5 4 4^ 4/ 4 4 4>4 4 4 D 12 . 36 4 4^ 4/ 4/ 3K 3^ 4 4 4 3/ 3^ 3/ 4 4 4 12 36 4^ 5 5 5 4^ 4 5 5 5 5 4 4/ ±y 2 4/ 2 4>4 E 12 36 2y 2 2y 2 2 2 2 2 sy 2 2y 2 3 2y 2 2 3 2/ 2/ 2/ 12 36 5 5y 2 4 4 4^ 4 5 5 6 4/ 4 4 4>4 4/ 4/2 F 12 36 5 ±y 2 5 4 4^ 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4=y 2 4 4 12 36 5/ ±y 2 4>4 4 4/ 4 5/ 4 5>4 5 4 4 . 4^ 4 4 G 12 36 7 5 8 7 8/ ey 2 7/ 5 8 ey 2 vy 2 6 iy 2 6 6/ 12 36 5/ 4 4 4 6 3/ 5 4 5 3/ 5>4 5 5 4 4^ 38 APPENDIX D INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BESSEMER PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT Y-4 Hours Elapsed Before Marking B.D. D.M.B. -Individual Marking F.F.F. W.D.C. Average Aver. Grade W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A 12 36 3/2 3/ 4 3/ 3/ 3 3/ 4 3 3/ 3/ 3/ 3/ 3/ ' 3/ 12 36 4 4 4/ 3/ 4 3 4/ 4 4 3/ 4 3/ 4 3/ 3/ B 12 36 4/ 4 5 4/ 4/ 4 5 4/ 4/ 4 4 4 4/ 4 4 12 36 4/ 4 5 4/ 4 4 5/ 4/ 4/ 4 4 4 4/ 4 4 C 12 36 4/ 4/ 4/ 4 4 3/ 5 4 4 4 4 3/ 4/ 4 4 12 36 4/ 4/ 5 4 4 4 5 4 4/ 4 3 4 4/ 4 4 D 12 36 , 4 4 4 3/ 4 3/ 4/ 3/ 3 3/ 3 3/ 3/ 3/ 3/ 12 5 5 5 6 5 4 5 36 4/ 5 4 4/ 4/ 4 4/ 4/ E 12 36 4/ 4 4/ 4 4/ 3/ 4/ 4/ 4 3 4 4 4/ 4 4 12 36 5/ 4 5 4 4/ 4 5 4/ 5 3/ 4 4 5 4 4/ F 12 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 36 3 3 3 3/ 3 3 3 3 12 36 3 3 4 3 3 3 4/ 4 2/ 4 2/ 3 3 3/ 3 G 12 36 8 7/ 8 8 8/ 8 7/ 8 7 7/ 7 8 7/ 8 7/ 12 36 6/ 6 6/ 6 7 7 7 5 6 5/ 6 7 6/ 6 6 APPENDIX D 39 INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BESSEMER PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT Z-l Hours Elapsed Before Marking B.D. D.M.B. -Individual Markings F.F.F. W.1XC. Average Aver. Grade W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A 12 36 6 5 6 5 4/ 4/ 4/ 4/ 5 6 4/ 4/ 5 5 5 12 36 5/ 5 4/ 4 4 4 4/ 5 5/ 4 4/ 4/ 4/ 4/ B 12 36 5 4/ 5 5 4/ 4/ 4/ 5 5/ 4 4 4 4/ 4/ 4/ 12 36 4/ 3/ 4 4 3/- 4 3/ 4 4 3/ 3/ 3/ 4: 3/ 3/ C 12 36 5 4/ 4/ 4 4 4/ 4/ 4/ 4 4/ 4 4/ 4/ 4/ 4>4 12 36 6 5 6/ 6 6 5 5/ 5 6 6 5 6 6 5/ 5/ D 12 36 4 3/ 3/2 3/ 3 3 4 3/ 3/ 3 3 3/ 3/ 3/ 3/ 12 36 5 4^ 5 4/ 4/ 4 5 4/ 4/ 4 4 4 4/ 4 4 E 12 36 5 4 5 4 4/ 4 4/ 4/ 5 4 5 4 5 4 4/ 12 36 5 4 5 4 4/ 4 4 4/ 4/ 4 4j& 4 4/ 4 4 F 12 36 7 5/ 8 6 7 7 7 7 7 5 5/ 6 IN < 6 6/ 12 36 6/ 5/ 8 5 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6/ 5/ 6 G 12 36 6 zy 2 7 5 7/ 6/ 6 6 6/ 5/ 6 7 6/ 6 6 40 APPENDIX D INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BASIC OPEN-HEARTH PLATES, GELATINE TEST— LOT W-l Hours Elapsed Before Marking B.D. D.M.B. -Individual Markin; F.F.F. W.D.C. "S Average Grade W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A 12 36 5 4 5 sy 2 5 4 4>4 4>4 5 4 5 4>4 5 4>4 4^ 12 36 5 5 5 5 5 4 4^ 4^ 5 4 4^ 4^ 5 ±y 2 4>4 B 12 36 4^ 4 ±y 2 4 5 sy 2 4^ 4^ 4^ 3>4 4 3^ ±y 2 4 4 12 36 4 4 4 3^ ±y 2 ?>y 2 3 ±y 2 4 3>4 3^ 3 4 3^4 3>4 C 12 36 5 ±y 2 4 4 ±y 2 4 ±y 2 5 5 4 4 4 ±y 2 4 4 12 36 2/ 2 2^ 2>4 l/ 2 2 2 2 2 2>4 2^ 3 2^ 2^ 2 2 D 12 36 4 4^ 4 3>4 4^ 3>4 4 4 4^ 3>4 3^ 3/ 2 4 zy 2 3H 12 36 4>4 ±y 2 5 4>4 5 4^ 5 5 4 4>4 4>4 4>4 ±y 2 ±y 2 4# E 12 36 $y 5 &y 2 5 5>4 4^ 6 4^ 5y 2 ±y 2 6 5y 2 sy* 5 5 12 36 5 J / 2 ±y 2 5 4^ 5^ ±y 2 5 4^ 5 4 5 5^ 5 4^ ±y* F 12 36 3 sy 2 3 3 3 3 3^ 3^ 3 3 4 3^ 3 3 3 12 36 5y 2 5 ±y 2 4 6 4 5 4^ 5y 2 ±y 2 $y 2 ±y 2 5^ 4^ 5 G 12 36 6 4 4 4 4 3 5 4^ ±y 2 3y 2 sy 2 4 5 4 4>4 12 36 5 4^ 5 5 4^ 4 4^ 4 ±y 2 ±y 2 5 4^ 4^ 4^ 4^ APPENDIX D 41 INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BASIC OPEN-HEARTH PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT W-2 Hours Elapsed Before Marking B.D. D.M.B. -Individual Markin F.F.P. W.D.C. Average A Grade 2JS W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A ... B ... C 12 ±y 2 4 4 4 3 3 3/2 36 4/ 3/ 3/ 4 4/ 3/ 4 3/ D 12 36 5/ 4/ 4/ 4 . 5 4 5/ 4/ W2 4 6 4 5 4 4/ 12 36 5 4/ 4/ 4 5 4 5 4/ 4 4 4 4/ 4/ 4 4 E 12 . 36 4 ±y 2 3/ . 4 3 4 4 4 3/ 3/ 4 4 3/ 4: 3/ 12 36 4/ 3/ 4/ 3 4 3/ 5/ 3 4/ 3 4 3/ 4/ 3 4 F 12 36 4/ 4^ 4 4 4 4 4/ 4 4 4/ 4/ 4 4 4 4 12 36 5/ 4 4/ 3^ . 5 3^ 4/ 4 5 3/ 6 4 5 . 3J4 4 G 12 4 4 4 4 3/ 5 4 36 4 3/ 3 4 3/ 3/ 3/ sy 2 42 APPENDIX D INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BASIC OPEN-HEARTH PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT X-l Hours Elapsed Before Marking -Individual Marking F.P.F. W.D.C. Average Grade B.D. D.M.B. W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A 12 36 5 4/ 4/ 4/ 4 4 4/ 4/ 3/ 4/ 4/ 4 4/ 4/ 4/ 12 36 5 4/ 4/ 4 4 4 5 4/ 3/ 4 5 4/ 4/ 4 4 B 12 36 5/ 5 5 5 4/ 5 5/ 5/ 4 5 5 4/ 5 5 5 12 36 4 3 3/ 3 3 3/ 3/ 4 3 3 3/ 3 3/ 3 3 C 12 36 3/ 3 2/ 2 3 3 2 ' 3 2 3 3 2/ 2/ 2/ 2/ D 12 36 7 4 7 3/ 2 6 3/ 7 4 6/ 3/ 6 4 6/ 3/ 5 12 36 W 2 6 4/ 6 3/ 5/ 4 6 3/ 4/ 3/ 6 4 5/ 4/ E 12 36 2 6 1/ 6/ 1/ 7 2 6 2 4/ 2 6 2 6 4 12 36 ey 2 2 7/ 1/2 7 1/ 7 2. 7 2 5/ 2 6/ 2 4 F 12 36 3/ 2>y 2 o O 3 3/ 3 4/ 3/ 3 3 3/ 3/ 3/ 3 3 12 36 3 3/ 3 3 3/ 4/ 3/ 3 3 3/ 3/ 3 3 G 12 36 3/ 5 3/ 5 4 4 5 5 3/ 4/ 4 4 4 4/ 4 12 36 5 3y 2 5/ 3^ 5 3^ 5/ 4 4 3 5 3^ 5 sy 2 4 APPENDIX D 43 INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BASIC OPEN-HEARTH PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT X-3 Hours Elapsed Before Marking -Individual Marking F.F.P. W.D.C. Average Aver Grade B.D. D.M.B. W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A 12 4 4 4 4 4 3/ 4 36 4 4 3/ 4 4 4 4 4 12 36 4 4 4/ 4 4 3/ 4/ 4 5 4 3/ 3/ 4 4 4 B 12 36 4 4 4 4/ 4 4 4/ 4/ 5/ 4 4 4 4/ 4 4 12 36 5 4/ 4 4/ 4/ 4/ 5 5 6 4/ 4/ 4 5 4/ 4/ C 12 36 4 4/ 3/ 4 4/ 4 4/ 5 2>y 2 5 4 4/ 4 4/ 4 12 36 4 5 3/ 4 4/ 4 4/ 4/ 4 5 3/ 4/ 4 4/ 4 D 12 36 4 3/ 3 3/ 4 3/ 2 4 3/ 3/ 3/ 3 3/ 3/ 3/ 3/ 12 36 5 4/ 4 4 4/ 4 5 4/ 5/ 4 3/ 4/ 4/ 4 4 E 12 36 sy 2 4 3 3 3/ 3 4 3/ 3^ 3 3 3/ 3/ 3/2 3/ 12 36 4 4 4 4 4 4 ±y 2 4/ 4 3/ 3/2 4 4 4 4 F 12 36 5 ±y 2 4^ 5 5/ 4 4/ 4 4 4 4/ 4/ 4/ 4/ 4^ 12 36 5/ ±y 2 5 5 5/ 4/ 5 4/ 6 4/ 4/ 4/ 5 4/ 4/ G 12 36 6 7 6/ 6 6 6 6 5 7 6 7 5 6/ 6 6 12 36 5 4>4 5y 2 5 5 4/ 5 5 6 4/ 6 4 5/ 4/ 5 44 APPENDIX D INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BASIC OPEN-HEARTH PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT Y-l Hours Elapsed Before Marking B.D. D.M.B. -Individual Markin; F.F.F. W.D.C. Average Grade W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A 12 36 4 3 3^ 4 sy 2 3 4 4 3 sy 2 4 3>4 sy 2 sy 2 3/2 12 36 5 4 4>4 4>4 4 3 J / 2 4^ 4^ 4 4>4 ±y 2 4 ±y 2 4 4 B 12 36 4^ 4 4 4 4 4 4^ 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 12 36 ±y 2 4 4 4 4 4 4J^ 4^ 5 3 4 4 4^ 4 4 C 12 36 4 sy 2 3>^ 3K 3/2 3^ 3^ 3>4 sy 2 4 3^ 4 zy 2 3^ 2,y 2 12 36 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2^ 3 3 3^ 2^ 3 iy 2 D 12 36 6 6 5/ 2 4^ 6^ sy 2 6 5>4 7 5 6 5 6 5 $y 2 12 36 6 6 6>4 6 ey 2 6 6^ 6 7^ 5 6 5^ ey 2 $y 2 6 E 12 36 4 4 4^ 4 4 4 4^ 4 5 3 4 4 ±y 2 4 4 12 36 6 5 5^ 5 6 6 5 4^ 6 5 6 5 5y 2 5 F 12 36 4^ , 4 4^ 5 4 4 4^ 4^ 4 4 5 4 4/, 4 4 12 36 5 4^ 4^ 4^ 4^ 4 5 4>4 5>4 3^ $y 2 4 5 4 4^ G 12 36 3/2 3 3 3 3^ 3^ 4 sy 2 4 3 3^ 3 3^ 3 3 12 36 4 3 3 zy 2 4 3^ 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 3^ 3^ APPENDIX D 45 INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BASIC OPEN-HEARTH PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT Y-4 Hours Elapsed Before Marking B.D. D.M.B. -Individual Markin F.F.F. W.D.C. Average Grade gs W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A 12 36 4 4 4 ±y sy sy 4 4^ 2>y 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 12 36 ±y 2 4^ ±y 5 zy 4 4^ ±y 4 4 4^ 4 4 4^ 4 B 12 36 3^ 3^ 3^ 3 3 sy zy 4 3 3 4 3^ 3^ 3^ 3# 12 36 3^ 3 sy 3 3 3^ 3^ 4 2^ 3^ 3^ 3^ 3 3>4 3 C 12 36 5 5 4^ 4^ 4 4^ 4^ 5 5 5 5 4^ 4>^ 4^ 4^ 12 36 4^ 5 4^ 5 4 5 5 6 5 5 4^ 4^ 4^ 5 4^ D 12 36 4 3 4 3>4 4 3^ 4 4 4^ 3 4 ' 4 4 3^ 3>4 12 36 4 3^ 4# sy 4^ 3^ 4^ 4 4 3^ 4 4 4 3^ 3>4 E 12 36 4^ 4 5 4 4^ 4 5 4^ 5 3 5 4 5 4 ±y 2 12 36 4 zy 4 3J4. 4 sy 4^ 4 3^ 3 4 4 4 3^ 3/ 2 F 12 36 %y 3 zy 3 3 3 4 3 2^ 2^ 3 3 3 3 3 12 36 sy 4 . 4 3^ 4 3K' 4^ 4 4>4 3^ 4 4 4 3^ 3^ G 36 12 4^ 4 4 4^ 5 sy 5 4>4 5 4/ 2 4 3^ 4^ 4 4 46 APPENDIX D INDIVIDUAL AND AVERAGE MARKINGS OF BASIC OPEN-HEARTH PLATES, GELATINE TEST— Continued— LOT Z-l Hours Elapsed Before Marking B.D. D.M.B. -Individual Markin F.F.F. W.D.C. Average A Grade gs W.D.B. w.s.s. Mark A 12 36 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 ±y 2 zy 5 5 4 4 4/ 4 12 36 ±y 2 ty 2 4/ 4/ 4 4 ±y 2 5 4 5/ 4 4/ 4 4/ 4 B 12 36 3/ 3 3 3 3 zy 3 3/ 2 3 3 4 3 3/ 3 12 36 zy 3 4/ 4 zy 2>y 2 ±y 2 ±y 3 zy zy zy 3/ °oy 2 3/ C 12 36 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 • 2/ i/ 2 2^ 3 3 2 2/ 2 12 36 ±y 2 ±y 2 5 ±y 2 5 4 5 4/ 4 4/ 4/ 5 4/ 4/ 4/ D 12 36 7 6/ ty 2 7 6/ 6/ 7/ 8 8 5/ 7 ey 7 ey 2 6>4 12 36 ey 6 7 6 6y 2 6 6 6 7 5 7 5/ ey oy 2 6 E 12 36 $y 2 ±y 2 6 4/ 6/ 5 5y 2 $y 5 4/ 6 5 sy 5 5 12 36 5 5y 2 5 5/ 6 5 sy 6 4 6 5/ 5 5 F 12 36 5 ±y 2 5 5 6 5 5 5 $y hy 2 6 ±y 2 5/2 5 5 12 36 3 2 4 2 3/ 2 4 2 4 3 4 3 •sy %y 3 G 12 36 4 ±y 4# 4 6 3/ 5/ 4^ 5 5 5 4 5 4 4^ 12 36 3 2y 2 4 3>4 3/ 3 4 4 4 3^ 4 3 3J4 3 3 APPENDIX E APPENDIX E— PLATE ANALYSES VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX PLATE W-l-A Bessemer Open Hearth .94 .92 .95 .94 .99 1.05 No. 1 List Edge .88 .91 .91 .97 .95 .91 No. 2 .64 .70 .73 .79 .79 .88 « .67 .78 .78 .84 .85 .95 No. 3 .84 .84 .84 .88 .84 .83 .77 .86 .84 .86 .90 .88 Maxima .94 .92 .95 .94 .99 1.05 .88 .91 .91 .97 .95 .95 Minima .64 .70 .73 .79 .79 .83 .67 .78 .78 .84 .85 .86 Average .81 .82 .84 .87 .87 .92 .77 .85 .84 .89 .90 .91 Avg. .94 Avg. .78 Avg. .85 95 .86 .84! .82 ,84 85 .85 82 85 .85 ,88 85 Avg. .85 86 85 .85 .87 85 .82 83 86 .87 89 Avg. .86 82 92 82 91 .83 92 85 93 87 91 80 85 Avg. .87 95 92 86 .91 .92 85 .93 91 .88 89 82 84 82 .82 83 .85 .82 82 .85 .85 80 ,85 88 87 84 87 85 .87 .84 .86 .87 .85 .86 Maximum 1 . 05 Minimum . 64 Average . 86 .95 .80 .86 Note. — Twelve analyses were made from six plates (three Bessemer, three Open Hearth) of each coating weight, the parts analyzed occupying approxi- mately the positions indicated by the figures in the table. 47 48 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-2-A Bessemer Open Hearth .80 .79 .78 .76 .80 .78 No. 1 List Edge .81 .73 .73 .72 .77 .76 No. 2 .63 .67 .70 .73 .71 .72 .81 .70 .71 .71 .73 .80 No. 3 .67 .62 .60 .62 .58 .67 .76 .72 .67 .68 .67 .83 Maxima .80 .79 .78 .76 .80 .78 .81 .73 .73 .72 .77 .83 Minima .63 .62 .60 .62 .58 .67 .76 .70 .67 .68 .67 .76 Average .70 .69 .69 .70 .70 .72 .79 .72 .70 .70 .72 .79 Avg. .77 Avg. .72 Avg. .67 .89 .97 .96 .89 1.04 .97 .93 .90 1.04 .87 1.03 .89 .79 .81 .79 .92 .85 .88 .83 .86 .86 .89 .85 .84' .90 .83 .80 .77 .78 .91 .91 .87 .84 .80 .84 .84 .90 .97 .96 .92 1.04 .97 .93 .90 1.04 .89 1.03 .89 .79 .81 .79 .77 .78 .88 .83 .86 .84 .80 .84 .84 .86 .87 .85 .86 .89 .92 . 89 . 88 ! .91 .85 .91 .86 f Avg. .95 Avg. .85 Avg. .86 Maximum . 83 Minimum . 58 Average . 72 1.04 .77 APPENDIX E 49 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-l-A Bessemer Open Hearth .88 .81 .84 .99 .88 .97 No. 1 List Edge .80 .75 ,82 .78 .79 .89 No. 2 .61 .65 .65 .63 .66 .68 .83 .72 .73 .72 .71 .74 No. 3 .70 .74 .65 .75 .71 .66 .80 .79 .74 .77 .78 .74 Maxima .88 .81 .84 .99 .88 .97 .83 .79 .82 .78 .79 .89 Minima .61 .65 .65 .63 .66 .66 .80 .72 .73 .72 .71 .74 Average .74 .73 .71 .79 .75 ,77 .81 .75 .76 .76 .76 .79 Avg. .85 Avg. .69 Avg. .74 .92 .78 .83 .87 .92 .90 .95 .76 .84 .85 .82 .85 .54 .66 .69 .70 .73 .74 .77 .78 .79 .8! .82 .83 .83 .78 .80 .78 .75 .72 .91 .83 .79 .82 .83 .75 .92 .83 .87 .92 .90 .95 .91 .83 .84 .85 .83 .85 .54 .66 .69 .70 .73 .72 .77 .76 .79 .81 .82 .75 .76 .76 .79 .80 .79 .80 .82 .79 .81 .83 .83 .81 1 Avg. Avg. .74 Avg .80 Maximum . 99 Minimum .61 Average . 76 .95 .54 .81 50 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-3-A Bessemer Open Hearth 1.01 .99 .88 .92 .90 1.09 No. 1 List Edge .93 .84 .97 .93 .81 .85 No. 2 .94 .88 .82 .88 .76 .68 .92 .88 .84 .91 .82 .75 No. 3 .74 .74 .78 .78 .70 .68 .90 .77 .80 .88 1.00 .85 Maxima 1.01 .99 .88 .92 .90 1.09 .93 .88 .97 .93 1.00 .85 Minima .74 .74 .78 .78 | .70 .68 .90 .77 .80 .88 .81 .75 Average .89 .87 .83 .86 .79 .82 .92 .83 .87 .91 .88 .82 Avg. .91 Avg. .84 Avg. .80 70 70 ,87 .68 67 .82 .86 67 80 I I 65 80 Avg. .76 Maximum 1 . 09 Minimum . 68 Average . 85 APPENDIX E 51 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-l-A Bessemer Open Hearth .85 .86 .82 .82 .85 .90 No. 1 List Edge .79 .96 .86 .98 .92 .85 No. 2 .82 .82 .92 .95 .97 1.00 .91 .82 .93 .98 1.02 1.01 No. 3 .94 .80 .79 .85 .82 .88 .92 .88 .90 .85 ..91 .95 Maxima .94 .86 .92 .95 .97 1.00 .92 .96 .93 .98 1.02 1.01 Minima .82 .80 .79 .82 .82 .90 .79 .82 .86 .90 .91 .85 Average .87 .87 .83 .84 .87 .88 .93 .89 .89 .94 .95 .94 Avg. .87 Avg. .93 Avg. .92 .91 1.02 .95 1.00 .94 .94 .92 .92 1.01 .93 1.06 .81 .82 .85 .78 .71 .76 .85 .88 .87 .79 .77 .81 .75 .79 .78 .76 .80 .75 .83 .86 .80 .80 .84 .85 .92 .91 1.02 .95 1.00 .94 .94 .92 .92 1.01 .93 1.06 .75 .79 .78 .76 .71 .75 .83 .86 .80 .79 .77 .81 .83 .84 .88 .83 .84 .82 .87 .89 .86 ! .87 i .85 .91 Avg. .96 Avg. .81 Avg. .81 Maximum 1 . 02 Minimum . 79 Average . 89 1.06 .71 .86 52 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-4-A Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge .83 .82 .82 .84 .89 .84 78 .78 .77 .78 .78 .83 Avg. .81 .96 1.00 1.03 1.03 1.02 1.10 .94 .98 .93 .94 .96 1.01 Avg. .99 No. 2 .91 .92 .87 .82 .83 .83 Avg. .89 .91 .91 .90 .86 .85 .86 .95 .93 .91 .89 .89 .96 .87 .93 .93 .88 .87 .88 Avg. .89 No. 3 .80 .82 .75 .78 .70 .69 Avg. .77 .70 .72 .72 .68 .70 .79 .81 .80 .83 .75 .80 .75 .75 .81 .82 .82 .98 .85 Avg. .78 Maxima .91 .92 .87 .84 .89 .84 .96 1.00 1.03 1.03 1.02 1.10 .95 .93 .91 .89 .89 .96 .94 .98 .93 .94 .98 1.01 Minima .80 .82 .75 .78 .70 .69 .70 .72 .72 .68 .70 .79 .78 .78 .77 .75 .78 .75 .75 .81 .82 .82 .87 .85- Average .85 .85 .81 .81 .81 .81 .85 .84 .84 .81 .82 .85 .86 .88 .88 .86 .86 .92 .85 .91 .89 .88 .94! .95 Maximum . 96 Minimum . 69 Average . 83 1.03 .68 .89 APPENDIX E 53 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Z-l-A Bessemer Open Hearth .89 .87 .92 .99 1.00 .98 No. 1 List Edge .90 .86 .92 .90 .93 .93 No. 2 .93 .90 .82 .79 .74 .78 .90 .91 .88 .84 .82 .86 No. 3 .79 .73 .77 .79 .79 .75 .87 .80 .79 .87 .85 .86 Maxima .93 .90 .92 .99 1.00 .98 .90 .91 .92 .90 .93 .93 Minima .79 .73 .77 .79 .74 .75 .87 .80 .79 .84 ■8| §.86 Average .87 .83 .84 .86 .84 .84 .89 .86 .86 .87 .87 .88 Avg. .92 Avg. .85 Avg. .81 Maximum 1 . 00 Minimum . 73 Average . 86 1.01 .91 .91 .91 .96 1.02 .85 .83 .85 .85 .83 .91 1.00 1.03 .92 .84 .84 .81 .93 .98 .94 .91 . 87 . 92 .91 .83 .75 .80 .77 .73 .92 .87 .84 .84 .82 .85 1 1.01 1.03 .92 .91 .96! 1.02 i .93 .98 .94 .91 .87 .92 .91 .83 .75 .80 .7.7 .73 .85 .83 .84 .84 .82; .85 .97 .92 .86, .85 .86 .85 .90 1 .89 .88i ! .87! .84 .89 Avg. .90 Avg. .92 Avg. .83 1.03 .73 .88 54 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-l-B Bessemer Open Hearth 1.09 1.05 .97 1.00 1.04 1.16 No. 1 List Edge .93 .84 .83 .90 1.00 .94 No. 2 1.03 .97 .93 .97 .95 1.05 1.21 1.02 1.05 .99 1.11 1.05 No. 3 .94 .92 .95 .85 .89 .98 1.17 1.00 1.10 1.01 1.08 1.00 Maxima 1.09 1.05 .97 1.00 1.04 1.16 1.21 1.02 1.10 1.01 ! 1.11 1.05 Minima .94 .92 .93 .85 .89 .98 .93 .84 .83 .90 1.00 .94 Average .99 .95 .95 .91 .96 1.06 1.10 .95 .99 .97 1.06 1.00 Avg. .98 Avg. 1.03 Avg. .99 1.40 i 1.13 .99 1.07 1.18 1.20 1.27 1.04! .93 .93 | .99 1.09 1.10 | .93 .87 .82 .96 1.17 1.18 1.06 1.00 1.03 1.10 1.34 1.13 1.07 .95 .93 .89 .93 1.22 1 1.21 1.08 1.10 1.19 1.18 1.40 1 1.13 .99 1.07 1.18 1.20 1.27 1.21 1.08 1.10 1.19 1.34 1.10 .93 .87 .82 .89 .93 1.18 1.04 .'93 .93 .99 1.09 1.21 1.04 .94 .97 1.01 1.10 1.22 1.10 1.00 1.02 1.09 1.20 Avg. 1.10 Avg. 1.05 Avg. 1.07 Maximum 1 . 16 Minimum . 83 Average 1 . 00 1.40 .82 1.07 APPENDIX E 05 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-2-B Bessemer Open Hearth .96 .96 1.03 1.03 i 1.10 1.18 Avg. No. 1 List Edge .90 .90 .87 .93 .98 1.00 .99 No. 2 .72 .74 .77 .86 .85 .82 Avg. .94 .99 1.02 .99 .99 .98 .89 No. 3 .80 .76 .80 .82 .85 .90 Avg. 1.05 .97 .94 .93 .96 .89 .89 Maxima .96 .96 1.03 1.03 1.10 11.18 1.05 .99 1.02 .99 .99 1.00 Minima .72 .74 .77 .82 .85 .82 .90 .90 .87 .93 .96 .89 • Average .83 .79 .87 .90 .93 .97 .96 .92 .94 .95 .98 .96 1.19 1.29 1.19 1.22 1.26 1.23 1.06 1.06 1.03 1.03 1.08 1.05 Avg. 1.14 1.03 1.10 .91 .89 .96 .95 1.10 1.16 1.06 .99 1.06 1.04 i Avg. 1.02 1.04 1.06 .95 .93 .91 1.08 1.14 1.16 1.26 1.10 .90 1.02 Avg. 1.04 1.19 1.29 1.19 1.22 1.26 1.23 1.14 1.16 1.26 1.10 1.08 1.05 1.03 1.06 .91 .89 .91 .95 1.06 1.06 1.03 .99 .90 1.02 1.09 1.15 1.02 1.01 1.04 1.09 1.10 1.13 1.18 1.04 1.01 1.04 Maximum 1.18 Minimum . 72 Average . 92 1.29 .89 1.07 56 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-l-B Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge No. 2 No. 3 Maxima Minima 1.11 1.02 1.11 1.11 1.10 1.12 1,14 .94 .91 .91 .91 .99 .94 .89 .82 .89 .93 .96 1.04 .97 .96 .98 .96 1.03 .98 .90 .84 .89 .94 1.00 1.08 1.04 1.05 1.01 1.07 .99 1.11 1.02 1.11 1.11 1.10 1.12 1.14 1.04 1.05 1.01 1.07 1.03 .94 .89 .82 .89 .93 .96 .98 .94 .91 .91 .91 .99 Avg. 1.03 Avg. .95 Avg. .98 1.10 1.22 1.22 1.24 1.10 1.09 1.12 1.14 1.15 1.03 .98 1.03 Avg. 1.11 1.22 1.10 . 96 j 1 . 00 1.08 1.10 1.23 1.16 1.05 1.06 1 1.08 1.15 Avg. 1.10 1.07 .96 .81 .75 .89 .93 1.14 1.02 .95 .95 1.00 1.05 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.24 1.10 1.10 1.23 1.16 1.15 1.06 1.08 1.15 1.07 .96 .81 .75 .89 .93 1.12 1.02 .95 .95 .98 1.03 Avg. 97. Average 1.01 .94 .92 .93 .99 1.03 1.09 .98 .97 .97 .98 1.00 1.13 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.1611.11 1 1.05 1.01 ! j 1.05ll.08 I Maximum 1 . 14 Minimum . 82 Average . 98 1.24 .75 1.06 APPENDIX E 57 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-3-B Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge 1.11 1.16 1.07 1.10 1.08 1.12 1.04 1.16 1.05 1.02 1.03 1.04 Avg. 1.08 1.27 1.30 1.25 1.30 1.20 1.19 1.15 1.08 1.05 1.07 1.30 1.16 Avg. 1.18 No. 2 1.23 11.10 1.03 1.07 1.10 1.09 1.14 1.14 1.15 1.09 1.15 1.08 Avg. 1.11 1.02 .95 .94 1.00 1.01 .95 1.12 1.06 1.01 1.02 1.05 .99 Avg. 11.0 No. 3 .88 .88 .92 .92 .85 .95 1.05 .98 .99 .97 .95 1.02 Avg. .95 1.03 .92 .90 .92 .90 1.00 1.15 1.05 .98 1.00 .97 1.03 Avg. .99 Maxima 1.23 1.16 1.07 1.10 1.10 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.15 1.09 1.15 1.08 1.27 1.30 1.20 1.15 1.05 1.30 1.25 1.30 1.19 1.08 1.07 1.16 Minima .88 .88 .92 .92 .85 .95 1.04 .98 .99 .97 .95 1.02 1.02 .92 .90 .92 .90 .95 1.12 1.05 .98 1.00 .97 .99 Average 1.07 1.05 1.01 1.03 1.01 1.05 1.08 1.09 1.06 1.03 1.04 1.05 Maximum 1 . 23 Minimum . 85 Average 1 . 05 1.30 .90 1.06 58 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-l-B Bessemer Open Hearth 1.09 1.03 1.06 1.01 .95 1.08 Avg. .97 1.27 1.21 1.20 1.18 1.20 1.23 Avg. No. 1 List Edge 1.14 .89 .79 .85 .89 .92 1.29 1.13 1.09 1.03 1.06 1.19 1.16 No. 2 1.10 1.00 .90 • 84 .85 .85 Avg. .99 1.10 .94 .83 .79 .77 .92 Avg. 1.18 1.07 1.04 1.00 .97 1.12 1.35 1.20 1.00 .97 1.01 1.00 .99 No. 3 1.15 1.00 .89 .94 .90 1.08 Avg. 1.03 1.05 .97 .87 .93 1.02 1.17 Avg. 1.15 1.07 .98 1.05 1.03 1.16 1.06 1.03 .99 1.04 1.10 1.23 1.04 Maxima 1.15 1.03 1.06 1.01 .95 1.08 1.27 1.21 1.20 1.18 1.20 1.23 1.15 1.07 1.04 1.05 1.03 1.16 1.35 1.2.0 1.09 1.04 1.10 1.23 Minima 1.09 1.00 .89 .84 .85 .85 1.05 .94 .83 .79 .77 .92 1.14 .89 .79 .85 .89 .92 1.06 1.03 .99 .97 1.01 1.00 Average 1.11 1.01 .95 .93 .90 1.00 1.14 1.04 .97 .97 .99 1.11 1.16 1.01 .94 .97 .96 1.07 1.23 1.12 1.03 1.01 i 1.06 Ll4 1 Maximum 1.16 Minimum . 79 Average 1 . 00 1.35 .77 1.06 APPENDIX E 59 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-4-B Bessemer Open Hearth 1.01 1.02 .99 .99 .99 1.04 No. 1 Li si Edge 1.03 1.01 1.00 1.01 1.07 1.04 Avg. 1.02 1.06 1.07 l.oaj i.09 ! 1.01 .99 . 9S| .99 1.02 1.07 1.02 1.03 Avg. 1.04 No. 2 .88 .87 .95 1.00 1.01 1.08 .03 .97 1.01 1.06 1.11 1.07 Avg. 1.00 .89 .94 .96 .95 .98 1.02 .98 1.00 .98 1.03 1 . 03 .99 Avg. .98 No. 3 .94 .88 .91 .96 1.02 1.10 Avg. 1.02 1.21 1.11 1.10 1.1C 1.12 1.17 1.07 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.14 1.13 1.12 1.17 1.10 1.16 1.20 1.20 Avg. 1.15 Maxima 1.01 1.02 .99 1.00 1.02 1.10 1.07 1.01 1.03 1.06 1.14 1.13 1.21 1.11 1.10 1.10 1.12 1.17 1.12 1.17 1.10 1.16 1.20 1.20 Minima .88 .87 .91 .96 .99 1.04 1.03 .97 1.00 1.01 1.07 1.04 .89 .94 .96 .95 .98 .99 .98 .99 .98 1.03 1.02 .99 Average .92 .92 .95 .98 1.01 1.07 1.04 .99 1.01 1.04 1.11 1.08 1.05 1.04 1.05 1.05 1.04 1.06 1.03 1.05 1.03 1.09 1.08 1.07 Maximum 1 . 14 Minimum . 87 Average 1.01 1.21 .89 1.06 60 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Z-l-B Bess EMER Open Hearth 1.14 1,26 1.17 1.12 1.24 1.29 Avg. 1.18 1.58 1.33 1.30 1.22 1.38 1.37 Avg 1.28 No. 1 List Edge 1.24 1.19 1.12 .98 1.18 1.26 1.36 1.19 1.12 1.10 1.15 1.25 No. 2 1.34 1.11 .91 .87 .98 1.06 Avg. 1.09 1.07 1.04 .94 .97 1.03 1.13 Avg 1.27 1.19 1.04 1.06 1.10 1.09 1.25 1.16 1.14 1.12 1.07 1.15 1.06 No. 3 .98 .98 .92 .88 .89 .98 Avg. 1.02 1.16 1.01 1.02 .94 1.04 1.01 Avg 1.06 1.20 1.18 1.04 .96 1.05 1.18 1.20 1.12 1.07 1.03 1.04 1.12 Maxima 1.34 1.26 1.17 1.12 1.24 1.29 1.58 1.33 1.30 1.22 1.38 1.37 1.27 1.19 1.12 1.06 1.18 1.26 1.36 1.19 1.14 1.12 1.15 1.25 Minima .98 .98 .91 .87 .89 .98 1.07 1.01 .94 .94 1.03 1.01 1.20 .98 1.04 .96 1.05 1.09 1.20 1.12 1.07 1.03 1.04 1.12 Average 1.15 1.12 1.00 .96 1.04 1.11 1.27 1.13 i ! 1.09 1.04, 1.15 1.17 1.17 1.24 1.19 1.07 1.00 1.11 1.18 1.27 1.16 l.llj 1.08J 1.09 Maxi Mini Aver mum mum age i.; .< 1.1 34 37 39 1 1 .58 .94 .14 APPENDIX E 61 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-l-C Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge No. 2 1.22 1.24 1.20 1.19 1.27 1.30 .97 1.05 1.10 1.02 1.211 1.24! Avg. 1.17 1.03 1.27 1.02 1.26 1.02 1.03 1 . 20! 1 . 22 1.02 1.03 1.25 1.15 Avg. 11.13 No. 3 Maxima Minima Average 1.29 1.30 1.29 1.13 1.10 1.16 1.30 1.23 1.22 1.14 1.14 1.20 1.29 1.30 1.29 1.19 1.27 1.30 1.30 1.26 1.22 1.22 1.25 1.24 1.03 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.02 1.03 .97 1.05 1.10 1.02 1.14 1.15 1.18 1.19 1.16 1.12 1.13 1.16 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.13 1.20 1.20 Avg. 1.21 Maximum 1 . 30 Minimum . 97 Average 1.17 1.38 1.36 1.36 1.30 1.27 1.34 1.43 1 1.44J 1.40 1.38 1.23 1.34 1.11 1.15 1.06 .96 1.04 1.12 1.27 1.17 1.10 1.14 1.18 1.23 1.47 1.37 1.40 1.27 1.27 1.30 1.47 1.15 1.18 1.26 1.34 1.34 1.47 1.37 1.40 1.30 1.27 1.34 1.47 1.44 1.40 1.38 1.34 1.34 1.11 1.15 1.06 .96 1.04 1.12 1.27 1.15 1.10 1.14 1.18 1.23 1.32 1.29 1.27 1.18 1.19 1.25 1.39 1.29 1.23 1.26 1.25 1.30 Avg. 1.36 Avg. 1.13 Avg. 1.32 1.47 * .96 1.27 62 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-2-C Bessemer Open Hearth 1.52 1.43 1.23 1.16 1.17 I 1.09 No. 1 List Edge 1.28 1.24 1.17 1.18 1.14 1.24 No. 2 1.15 1.05 .96 1.04 1.12 1.18 1.11 1.10 1.08 1.12 1.16 1.17 No. 3 1.06 1.06 1.12 .98 1.08 1.26 1.05 1.15 1.14 1.17 1.21 1.25 Maxima 1.52 1.43 1.23 1.16 1.17 1.26 1.28 1.24 1.17 1.18 1.21 1.25 Minima 1.06 1.05 .96 .98 1.08 1.09 1.05 1.10 1.08 1.12 1.14 1.17 Average 1.24 1.18 1.10 1.06 1.12 1.18 1.15 1.16 1.13 1.16 1.17 1.22 Avg. 1.24 Avg. 1.10 Avg. 1.20 1.27 1.2C 1.2S 1.32 1.31 1.28 1.281 1.2S 1.3C 1.27 1.26, 1.27 1.21 1,15 1.10 1.14 1.14 1.13 1.25 1.26 1.20 1.21 1.23 1.25 1.29 1.17 1.05 1.04 1.00 .89 1.35 1.35 1.25 1.17 1.10 1.10 1.29 1.26 1.29 1.32 1.31 1.28 1.35 1.35 1.30 1.27 1.28 1.27 1.21 1.15 1.05 1.04 1.00 .89 1.25 1.26 1.20 1.17 1.10 1.10 1.26 1.19 1.15 1.17 1.15 1.10 1.29 1 1.30J 1.25 1.22 1.19 1.21 Avg. 1.28 Avg. 1.19 Avg. 1.15 Maximum 1 . 52 Minimum . 96 Average 1 . 14 1.35 .89 1.21 APPENDIX E 63 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-l-C Bessemer Open Hearth 1.21 1.24 1.15 1.19 1.26 1.23 No. 1 List Edge 1.15 1.22 1.09 1.16 1.09 1.19 No. 2 1.12 .92 .89 1.02 .99 1.06 1.11 1.15 1.18 1.17 1.25 1.30 No. 3 1.19 .90 .95 .95 .97 1.04 1.33 1.23 1.10 1.10 1.12 1.21 Maxima 1.21 1.24 1.15 1.19 1.26 1.23 1.33 1.23 1.18 1.17 1.25 1.30 Minima 1.12 .90 . .89 .95 .99 1.04 1.11 1.15 1.09 1.10 1.09 1.19 Average 1.17 1.19 1.00 1.05 1.07 1.11 1.20 1.09 1.12 1.14 1.15 1.23 Avg. 1.18 Avg. 1.10 Avg. 1.09 1.43 1.50 1.31 1.35 1.29 1.23 1.32 1.28 1.29 1.20 1.28 1.24 Avg. 1.31 1.31 1.31 1.33 1.35 1.42 1.44 1.42 1.50 1.48 1.51 1.54 1.48 Avg. 1.42 1.05 1.21 1.02 1.12 1.00 .94 1.10 1.11 91 1.11 1.09 1.09 Avg. 1.06 1.43 1.33 1.50 1.35 1.42 1.44 1.42 1.50 1.48 1.51 1.54 1.48 1.05 1.21 1.02 1.12 1.00 1.10 94 1.11 91 1.11 1.09 1.09 1.26 1.34 1.22 1.27 1.24 1.26 1.23 1.27 1.22 1.31 I 1.30 1.27 Maximum 1 . 33 Minimum . 89 Average 1.13 1.54 .91 1.27 64 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-3-C No. 1 List Edge No. 2 No. 3 Maxima Minima Average Bessemer Open Hearth 1.31 1.22 1.37 1.36 1.63 1.75 Avg. 1.45 1.47 1.48 1.38 1.38 1.28 1.30 Avg. 1.36 1.29 1.26 1.36 1.52 1.63 1.66 1.51 1.42 1.34 1.33 1.30 1.18 .91 .85 .94 1.01 1.14 1.29 Avg. 1.05 1.32 1.18 1.04 1.15 1.23 1.29 Avg. .95 .91 1.03 1.08 1.20 1.27 1.38 1.31 1.09 1.20 1.23 1.28 1.22 i 1.1.0 1.00 1.02 .95 .87 .84 Avg. 1.01 1.12 1.13 11.16 1.24 1.38 1.20 Avg. 1.26 ! 1.10 1.17 1.15 1.07 .98 .89 1.17 1.28 1.27 1.35 1.36 1.50 # 1.31 1.22 1.37 1.36 1.63 1.75 1.47 1.48 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.30 j 1.29 1.26 1.36 1.52 1.63 1.66 1.51 1.42 1.34 1.35 1.36 1.50 .91 .85 .94 .95 .87 .84 1.12 1.13 1.04 1.15 1.23 1.20 .95 .91 1.03 1.07 .98 .89 1.17 1.28 1.09 1.20 1.23 1.18 y 1.11 1.02 1.11 1.11 1.21 1.29 1.30 1.26 1.19 1.26 1.29 1.26 '< 1.11 1.11 1.18 1.22 1.27 1.27 1.35 1.34 1.23 1.29 1.29 1.32 Maxi Mini] Aver, mum num ige 1.1 1.1 7 5 54 l7 1 1 1 51 04 28 APPENDIX E 65 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-l-C Bessemer Open Hearth 1.18 1.09 1.16 .96 .90 1.18 No. 1 List Edge 1.11 1.15 1.16 1.14 1.08 1.04 No. 2 1.50 1.51 1.40 1.36 1.37 1.39 1.55 1.35 1.36 1.33 1.45 1.45 No. 3 1.44 1.37 1.24 1.21 1.10 1.20 1.44 1.32 1.25 1.24 1.20 1.21 Maxima 1.50 1.51 1.40 1.36 1.37 1.29 1.55 1.35 1.36 1.33 1.45 1.45 Minima 1.18 1.09 1.16 .96 .90 1.18 1.11 1.15 1.16 1.14 1.08 1.04 Average 1.37 1.32 1.27 1.18 1.12 1.26 1.37 1.27 1.26 1.24 1.24 1.23 Avg. 1.09 Avg. 1.42 Avg. 1.27 1.29 1.30 1.26 1.28 1.26 1.34 1.21 1.33 1.33 1.28 1.28 1.24 1.23 1.17 1.15 1.19 1.26 1.22 1.25 1.20 1.25 1.23 1.28 1.28 1.29 1.30 1.26 1.28 1.26 1.34 1.25 1.33 1 1.33J1.28 1.28 1.28 1.23 1.17 1 1.15 1.19 1.26 1.22 1.21 1.20 1.25 1.23 1.28 1.24 1.26 1.24 1.22 1.24 1.26 1.28 1.23 1.26 1.29 1.26 1.28 1.26 Avg. 1.28 Avg. 1.21 Maximum 1 . 55 Minimum . 90 Average 1 . 26 1.34 1.15 1.25 66 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-4-C Bessemer Open Hearth 1.36 1.16 1.19 1.17 1.18 1.31 No. 1 List Edge 1.30 1.18 1.21 1.16 1.16 1.29 Avg. 1.22 No. 2 1.29 1.22 1.19 1.14 1.22 1.39 1.32 1.32 1.29 1.28 1.38 1.38 Avg. 1.29 No. 3 1.24 1.19 1.16 .98 .90 1.23 1.25 1.02 1.09 1.06 1.05 1.30 Avg. 1.12 Maxima 1.36 1.22 1.19 1.17 1.22 1.39 1.32 1.32 1.29 1.28 1.38 1.38 Minima 1.24 1.16 1.16 .98 .90 1.23 1.25 1.02 1.09 1.06 1.05 1.24 Average 1.30 1.19 1.18 1.10 1.10 1.31 1.29 1.17 1.30 1.17 1.30 1.31 1.42 1.37 1.33 1.34 1.42 1.51 1.38 1.29 1.22 1.26 1.27 1.39 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.09 1.15 1.12 1.08 1.10 1.11 1.19 1.23 1.34 1.28 1.24 1.25 1.23 1.25 1.31 1.28 1.26 1.24 1.29 1.24 1.42 1.37 1.33 1.34 1.42 1.51 1.38 1.29 1.26 1.26 1.29 1.39 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.09 1.15 1.12 1.08 1.10 1.11 1.19 1.23 1.29 1.22 1.19 1.21 1.25 1.30 1.27 1.22 1.19 1.20 1.25 1.29 Avg. 1.35 Avg. 1.10 Avg. 1.27 Maximum 1 . 39 Minimum . 90 Average 1 . 23 1.51 1.00 1.24 APPENDIX E 67 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued Bessemer PLATE Z-l-C Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge No. 2 1723 trtT 1732 T7T2 T73S 1731 1.27 1.18 1744 T7T4 TT3T 1719" Avg. 1.26 IrtT 1t48- 1t19 1-34- IrlS -3b39- 1.25 1.39 +r44 *r5* TToT -tr62- Avg. 1.38 No. 3 rm 1^& "95 T709 1.10 1.13 96il.03il.10 1.141.19 irie- Avg. 1.10 Maxima 133 T732 T73S 1.31 1.44 1.57 1.48 1.34 1.39 1.44' 1.51 1.02 Minima 1705" 117 -m TTT2 T709" T7T3 "96" T7T4 1.03 1.10 1.14 1.16 Average rts ir28 trtS TT2t 1721 1rr2d T7T? tt25 T729 tt28 1733" ±r32- 1 1.39 1.40 i 1.37 1.54 1.47i 1.46 1.41 1.33 1.33 1.43 1.29 Avg. 1.40 1t3# 4r30 1rr33 4-r33 1rr29 1t2S 1.34' 1.34 1t33 4t32 1-729- 4-36- Avg. 1.32 1723 1720 T72T 1-30 1723 1t25- T7T7 1t24 1719 1-725 1725" 1721 Avg. 1.23 1739" T74tr T747 T746 T733 T743- 1.37 1.54 1.41 1.34 1.34 1.36 1723 T72T T723 T7T7 1.19 1.25 1.20 1.30 1.25 1.24 1.25 1.24 ~ 1731 1731 T733 1.30i 1.28 1732" 1.29 1.39 1.33 1.30' 1.30 1.30 Maximum 1 . 62 Minimum . 95 Average 1 . 24 1.54 1.17 1.31 68 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-l-D Bessemer Open Hearth 1.75 1.61 1.56 1.48 1.40 1.44 No. 1 List Edge 1.70 1.51 1.50 1.38 1.39 1.40 No. 2 1.35 1.28 1.26 1.23 1.23 1.25 1.53 1.35 1.38 1.37 1.29 1.35 No. 3 1.32 1.20 1.28 1.03 1.09 1.11 1.42 1.25 1.24 1.17 1.18 1.22 Maxima 1.75 1.61 1.56 1.48 1.40 1.44 1.70 1.51 1.50 1.38 1.39 1.40 Minima 1.32 1.20 1.26 1.03 1.09 1.11 1.42 1.25 1.24 1.17 1.18 1.22 Average 1.47 1.36 1.37 1.25 1.24 1.27 1.52 1.37 1.37 1.31 1.29 1.32 Avg. 1.51 Avg. k32 Avg. 1.21 1.43 ! 1.44! 1.44 i 1.48 1.48 1.44 1.38 j 1 1.40 1.27 1.37i 1.40 i ; 1.51 1.45 1.43 1.42 1.43; 1.30 1.30 1.42 1 1.44 1.45 1 1.40 1.35 1.33 1 1 1.36 1.34 1.24 1.27 1.28 1.21 1.36 1 1.37 1.37 1.40 1.32 1.36 1.45 1.44 - 1.44 1.48 1.48 1.44 1.42 1.44 1.45 1.40 1.40 1.51 1.36 1.34 1.24 1.27 1.28 1.21 1.36 1.37 1.27 j 1.371 1.32 i i 1.33 1.41 1.40 1.37 1.39 1.35 1.32 1.39 ! l 1.4o! 1.36 ! ' 1 1.39 1.35 1.40 Avg. 1.42 Avg 1.39 Avg 1.32 Maximum 1 . 75 Minimum 1 . 03 Average 1 . 35 1.51 1.21 1.38 APPENDIX E 69 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-2-D Bessemer Open Hearth 1.52 1.63 1.51 1.58 1.47 1.49 No. 1 List Edge 1.34 1.44 1.31 1.29 1.31 1.44 No. 2 1.18 1.19 1.16 1.13 1.12 1.23 1.26 1.13 1.10 1.10 1.26 1.35 No. 3 1.29 1.32 1.27 1.20 1.16 1.18 1.52 1.44 1.29 1.24 1.30 1.80 Maxima 1.52 1.63 1.51 1.58 1.47 1.49 1.52 1.44 1.31 1.29 1.31 1.44 Minima 1.18 1.19 1.16 1.13 1.12 1.18 1.26 1.13 1.10 1.10 1.20 1.30 Average 1.33 1.38 1.31 1.30 1.25 1.30 1.37 1.34 1.23 1.21 1.26 1.36 Avg. 1.44 Avg. 1.18 Avg. 1.28 1.38 1.48 1.41 1.38 1.48 1.43 1.33 1.34 1.29 1.14 1.24 1.29 1.42 1.42 1.39 1.37 1.34 1.35 1.54 1.60 1.56 1.52 1.51 1.50 1.38 1.35 1.35 1.33 1.35 1.35 1.40 1.46 1.53 1.55 1.54 1.50 1.42 1.48 1.41 1.38 1.48 1.43 1.54 1.00 1.56 1.55 1.54 1.50 1.38 1.35 1.35 1.33 1.34 1.35 1.33 1.34 1.29 1.14 1.24 1.29 1.39 1.42 1.38 1.36 1.39 1.38 1.42 1.47 1.46 1.40 1.43 1.43 I Avg. 1.35 Avg. 1.46 Avg. 1.51 Maximum 1 . 63 Minimum 1 . 10 Average 1 . 30 1.60 1.14 1.41 70 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-l-D Bessemer Open Hearth 1.50 1.48 1.44 1.42 1.45 1.55 No. 1 List Edge 1.40 1.40:1.38 1.41 1.47 1.50 No. 2 1.39 1.4.1 1.37 1.38 1.40 1.55 1.59 1.59 1.51 . 1 1.44 1.45 1.55 No. 3 1.18 1.16 1.00 .98 1.03 1.07 1.23 1.22 1.09 1.11 1.12 1.21 Maxima 1.50 1.48 1.44 1.42 1.45 1.55 1.59 1.59 1.51 1.44 1.47 1.55 Minima 1.18 1.16 1.00 .98 1.03 1.07 1.23 1.22 1.09 1.11 1.12 1.21 Average 1.36 1.35 1.27 1.26 1.29 1.39 1.41 1.40 1.30 1.32 1.35 1.42 Avg. 1.45 Avg. 1.47 Avg. 1.12 1.63 1 . 69 1 . 68 1 . 73 1.81 1.79 1.41 ! j 1 1.40; 1.36 1.36 1.46) 1.61 1.24 1.27; 1.27 1.14 1.17 1.35 1.28 1.311 1.25 1.22 1 1 . 25 1 . 29 1.65 1.591 1.5011.26 1 i 1.30 1.26 1.76 1.71 1.57 1.48 i 1.49 1.40 1.65 1.69 ■ ; 1.68 1.73 1.81 1.79 1.76 1.71 1.57 1.48 1.49 1.61 1.24 1.27 1. 27J1.14 1.17 1.26 1.28 i i 1.31 1.25 1.22 i : 1.25 1.29 1.51 1.45 1.48 1.38 1.43 1.46 1.48 1.47 1.39] 1.35 1.40 1.43 Avg. 1.58 Avg. 1.27 Avg. 1.50' Maximum 1 . 59 Minimum . 98 Average 1 . 34 1.81 1.14 1.44 APPENDIX K 71 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-3-D Bessemer Open Hearth 1.31 1.29 1.45 1.54 1.67 1.85 No. 1 List Edge 1.12 1.22 1.40 1.47 1.62 1.85 No. 2 1.08 1.06 1.27 1.39 1.52 1.66 1.25 1.18 1.29 1.3.7 1.49 1.72 No. 3 1.13 1.17 1.22 1.40 1.50 1.75 1.31 1.16 1.28 1.43 1.49 1.73 Maxima 1.31 1.29 1.45 1.54 1.67 1.85 1.31 1.22 1.40 1.47 1.62 1.85 Minima 1.08 1.06 1.22 1.39 ]1.50 1.66 j 1.12 1.16 1.28 1 1.37 1.49 1.72 Average 1.17 1.17 1.31 1.44 1.56 1.75 1.25 1.19 1.32 1.42 1.87 1.77 Avg. 1.48 Avg. 1.36 Avg. 1.36 1.33 1.41 1.50 1 . 58 1 . 65 1.72 1.00 I 1.0911.24 1.38 1.55 1.70 Avg. 1.43 1.04 1.04 1.15 1.33 1.46 1,56 1.26 1.29 1.46 1.48 1.58 1.67 Avg. 1.36 1.75 1.50 1.30 1.36 1.20 1.10 1.83 1.78 1.63 1 . 49 ! 1 . 40 1.31 Avg. 1.47 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.58 1.65 1.72 1.83 1.78 ! 1.63 1.49 1.58 1.70 1.04 1.04 1.15 1.33 1.20 1.10 1.00 1.09 1.24 1.38 1.40 1.31 1.37 1.32 1.32 1.42 1.44 1.46 1.36 1.39 1.44 1.45 1.51 1.56 Maximum 1 .85 Minimum 1 . 06 Average 1 . 40 1.83 1.00 1.42 72 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-l-D Bessemer Open Hearth 1.68 1.62 1.62 1.52 1.65 1.77 No. 1 List Edge 1.52 1.44 1.42 1.44 1.56 1.59 No. 2 1.55 1.39 1.29 1.23 1.28 1.28 1.74 1.65 1.47 1.40 1.37 1.44 No. 3 1.72 1.50 1.37 1.30 i 1.15 .80 1.76 1.55 1.34 1.45 1.34 1.33 Maxima 1.72 1.62 1.62 1.52 1.65 1.77 1.76 1.65 1.47 1.45 1.56 1.59 Minima 1.55 1.39 1.29 1.23 1.15 . .80 1.52 1.44 1.34 1.40 1.34 1.33 Average 1.65 1.50 1.43 1.35 1.36 1.28 1.67 1.55 1.41 1.43 1.42 1.45 Avg. 1.57 Avg. 1.42 Avg. 1.38 1.85 1.7811.64 1.5511.55 1.49 1.71 1.63! 1.49 1.3711.3711.36 Avg. 1.56 1.40 1.35 1.35 1.29 1.28 1.29 1.37 1.45 1.40 1.36 1.35 1.40 Avg. 1.36 1.42 1.33 ! 1.30 [1.30 1.29 1.28 1.35 1.27 1.34 1.30 1.32 1.30 Avg. 1.31 1.85 1.78 1.64 1.55 1.55 1.49 1.71 1.63 1.49 1.37 1.37 1.40 1.40 1.33 1.29 1.28 1.29 1.28 1.35 1.27 1.34 1.30 1.32 1.30 1.56 1.49 1.41 1.38|1.38 1 1.38 1.47 1.45 1.41 1.34|1.35 1.35 Maximum 1 . 77 Minimum . 80 Average 1 . 46 1.85 1.27 1.41 APPENDIX E 73 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-4-D Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge 1.35 jl. 39 1.36 1.39 1.55 1.51 1.31 1.19 i 1.13 1.19 1.39 1.48 Avg. 1.35 1.54 1.54 1.50)1.47 1.51 1.44 1.401. 4l!l. 39 1.48 1.43 1.41 Avg. 1.46 No. 2 1.33 1.36 1.36 1.27 1.21 1.19 1.37 1.41 1.43 1.37 1.32 1.28 Avg. 1.33 No. 3 1.27 1.24 1.35 1.40 1.28 1.38 1.21 1.2511.30 1.27 1.30 1.37 Avg. 1.30 Maxima Minima Average 1.35 1.39 1.36 1.39 1.55 1.51 1.37 1.41 1.43 1.37 1.39 1.48 1.27(1.24 1.28 1.21 1.21 i 1.19 1.31 j 1.19 1.13 1. 19 i 1.30 1 1.28 1.32 1.33 1.33 1.29 1.34 1.30 1.34 1.33 1.31 1.27 1.34 1.38 1.32 1.30 1.39 1.40 i 1 . 33 ! 1 . 43 i 1 . 61 1 . 60 1.491. 5511.59 1.61 Avg. 1.48 1.30 1.29 1.42 1.47 1.55 1.69 1.44 1.50 1.48 1.52 .1.60 1.66 1.54 1.54 1.50 1.47 1.61 1.69 1.44 1.50 1.49 1.55 1 1.60 1.66 1.30 1.29 | 1.33J1.43 I 1.51 1.48 1.39 1.40 j 1.41 1.39 1.43 1.41 1.39 1.38 • 1.42 1.46 1.56 1.59 1.42 1.43 1.46 1.49 1.54 1.561 Avg. 1.50 Maximum 1 . 55 Minimum 1.13 Average 1 . 32 1.69 1.29 1.48 74 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Z-l-D Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge No. 2 IrSO- 1^0- irrm U3& ±r4£ U44r 4rr49-^T^5 1.50 1.11 ±7^5" 4^54- Avg. 1.50 1^34 1A5. 4_3S- 1 43 4^28- 1.38 4^24 1.35 4-^4^-32 1.39 1.36 Avg. 1.35 No. 3 4t75- JUS5- 4^0- i^§4 4-r£± 1.66 1.68 1.71 1.69 1.71 4-r68- 4^-80- Avg. 1.72 Maxima U5- i^a 4^51 4^46- 1. 85 1 84 1 71 1 . 6 9 1. 7 4 1 .80 4^68- ±v4>g- Minima ±t36- 4^39- lr-28- 4^-26- 4~r2^ 1.45 1.36 1.38 1.35 1.30 1.36 ±r32- Average 4^57- 4^53- 4-y, ±v47 1.60 1.54 1.51 1 1.51 1.52 1,56 4v££ ±r£2- 1.65 1.59 1.52 1.481.52 1.52 1.18 1.52 1.48 1.501.571.50 Avg. 1.54 4t55- 1ttS& 1.10 1.45 1.48 4-n59- 1.57 1.591. 561.63 1.71 1.76 Avg. 1.58 ±r54r ±t46- 1.15 1.50 M3- ±-35- 1-36- 1.381.321.37 1.30 lrr36- Avg. 1.41 1.65 1.50 ±t^2- 1.48 1.52 lr-59- 1 . 57 1.59 1.56 1.631.711.76 - ±t54- 4^45- 4^46- 4tt43- 1.50 1.38 1.35 1.30 1 . 32 1 . 37 ±786- ±t^9- 1.58 1.53 1t48 4tt43- 1t45- 1,501.51 1.17 1.511.55 1.55 1t49- Maximum 1 . 85 Minimum 1 . 26 Average 1 . 52 1.76 1.32 1.51 APPENDIX E 75 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-l-E No. 1 List Edge No. 2 1.89 1 1.79 1. 75 1 . 70 Bessemer 1773 ±770 177¥ T78T TTW T7S* TTW t-89- Avg. 1.83 2.25 1.91 2r0& ±t97- 1 . 82 i 1 . 73 i 1.67 ±r92-±- trS5- trTtr ±"80" Avg. 1.88 No. 3 ±773" tm T76T ±757 TTT58" ±765- ±760" ±75fr ±748" ±70^ ±752" ±758" Avg. 1.58 Maxima 2.25 1.91 1.82 1.79 1.96 ; 1.96 U.UO ±t97±t92 ±-85- ±t89- Minima 1.73 1.61 1.58 1 1.60 1.48 ±^3~±t57 1.65 1.50 1.50 ±752" ±758" Average ±96 1.77 1.71 ,1.71 lr8±! l.75 1.70 ±t73- ±770 ±773" ±t73 Maximum 2725" Minimum 1 . 48 Average 1 . 76 ±t76- Open Hearth 1.70 1 1.81 1.63 1.67 1786" ±785" 1 . 78 i 1 . 78 I I ±777 ±785" ±786" Avg. 1.79 ±795- 1rr86- 2t6± 1 . 87 i 1 . 78 i 1 . 8 i 1 . 71 i 1 .72- ±t78- Avg. 1.78 1 . 77 1 . 77 ±765-i±708- 1782" 1t97 T78tr ±79^ 1.71)1.59 ±-8e ±:72 ±754" ±772 ±7B5~ ±790" Avg. 1.76 1.86 1.87 1.86 1.85 1. 7 7 1.86 ' 2r6±r ±79fr!±r80-: ±778"! ±785-: ±7#5- 1.70 1.80 1.71 1 . 59 i 1 . 54 1.65 r7T±772"i 1.65 1.68 1.79 1.83 1.721.75 1.67 1.7 4 1.87 il.80il.78il.76 -2ror 1.54 1.78 1.74 1.84 76 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-2-E Bessemer Open Hearth 1.95 1.73 1.60 1.68 1.86 1.63 No. 1 List Edge 1.49 1.36 1.44 1.53 1.45 1.69 No. 2 1.96 1.80 1.81 11.76 1 . 70 i 1 . 73 1.86 1.82 1.85 1.84 1.86 1.95 No. 3 1.99 1.89 2.00 1.83 1.74 1.76 2.00 1.83 1.91 1.84 1.93 1.80 Maxima 1.99 1.89 2.00 1.83 1.86|1.76 2.00 1.83 1.91 1.84 1.93 jl.95 Minima 1.95 1.73 1.60 1.68 1.70 1.63 1.49 1.36 1.44 1.53 1.45 1.69 Average 1.97 1.81 1.80 1.76 1.77 1.71 1.78 1.67 1.73 1.74 1.75 1.81 Avg. 1.62 Avg. 1.83 AV£ 1.8 1.89 1.96 1.89 1.90,1.94 1.89 1.79 1.80 1 1.79 1.77:1.76 1.81 1.61 j 1.62 1.75 1.77 1.85 1.85 1.68 1.69 1 . 79 1 1 . 86 1 . 98 , 1 . 99 1.69 1.59 1.63 i | 1 . 66 1 . 67 1 . 63 1 1.78 1.73 1.83 ! 1.86il.881.73 1.89 1.96 1.89 1.90 1.94 1.89 1.79 1.80 1.83 1 1.86 1.98 1.99 1.61 1.59 1.63 1.66 jl. 67 1.63 1.68 11.69 1.79 1 1.77 1.76 1.73 1.73 1.72 1.76 1.78 1.82 1.79 1.75 ! 1.74 1.81 1.83 ll.87 il. 84 Avg. 1.85 Avg. 1.79 Avg. 1.72 Maximum 2 . 00 Minimum 1 . 36 Average 1 . 78 1.99 1.59 1.79 APPENDIX E 77 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-l-E Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge No. 2 No. 3 2.05 1.85 1.75 1.78 1.89 1.97 1.75 1.71 1.51 1.55 1.72 1.92 1.81 [1.77 1.64 1.55 1.66 1.64 2.03 1.86 1.70 1.64 1.75 1.82 1.73 1.72 1.68 1 . 60 ' 1 . 58 1.75 1.80 1.69 1.62 1 . 64 | 1 . 60 1.77 Avg. 1.78 Avg. 1.74 Avg. 1.68 Maxima 2.05 1.85 1.75 2.03 1.86 11.70 1.78 1.; 1.64 1.75 1.97 1.92 Minima ! I 1.73! 1.72 ! ,1. 64 1.75 i 1. 69 1 1,51 1 . 55 i 1 . 58 1 . 55 ! 1 . 60 1.64 1.77 Average 1.86 1.86 1.78 1.69 1.64 1.71 1.79 1.82 1.61 1.61 1.69 1.84 1.69 1.70 1.74 1.87 1.81 1.80 ! 1.74 1.71 1.80 11.81 1.78 1.80 1.87 1.95 1.91 1.91 1.85 1.76 1.83 t 1.73 1.76 1.71 1.6811.69 | 1.87 1.97 1.91 1.91 1.85 1.80 1.95 2.12 1.93 1.81 1.83 1.76 1.87 1 1.97 1.91 1.91 1.85 1.80 1.95 2.12 1.93 1.81 1.88 1.80 1.69 1.70 1 . 74 1 . 85 ! 1.72 1.68 1.74 1.71 1.76 | 1. 71 | 1.68; 1.69 1 ! 1 1.80 1.87 1.86 1.88 1.79 1.75 1.84 J 1.85 1.83 1.80 1.761 1.75 Avg. 1.77 Avg. 1.81 Avg. 1.86 Maximum 2.05 Minimum 1.51 Average 1 . 74 2.12 1.68 1.82 78 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-3-E Bessemer Open Hearth 2.05 1.8C 1.6C 1.54 1.41 i 1.46 No. 1 List Edge 1.85 1.77 1.64 1.51 1.25 1.32 No. 2 1.47 1.47 1.61 1.83 1.90 2.06 1.52 1.52 1.58 1.74 1.86 2.08 No. 3 1.37 1.38 1.44 1.55 1.58 1.72 1.45 1.38 1.38 1.44 1.60 1.74 Maxima 2.05 1.80 1.61 1.83 1.90 2.06 1.85 1.77 1.64 1.74 1.86 2.08 Minima 1.37 1.38 1.44 1.54 1.41 1.46 1.45 1.38 1.38 1.44 1.25 1.32 Average 1.83 1.55 1.55 1.64 1.63 1.75 1.61 1.56 1.53 1.56 1.57 1.71 Avg. 1.59 Avg. 1.72 Avg. 1.50 Maximum 2 . 08 Minimum 1 . 25 Average 1 . 60 1.69 1.62! 1.621 1.46 1.40 1.53 1.85J 1.721 1.64 1.58 1.44 1.60 Avg. 1.60 1.30 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.39 : 1.45: 1.74 I 1.77 1.64J 1. 88 1.94 2.03 Avg. 1.66 1.78 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.60! 1.81 1.61 1.73 1.69 1.71 1.8412.00 Avg. 1.69 1.78 1.62,1.62 1.60 1.85 1.72 1.741 1.77 1.81 1. 1.94 2.03 1.3011.30 1.39 1.45 1.35 1.46 1,64 1.58 1.49 1.53 1.441 1.60 1.58 1.47 1.52 1.51 1 1. 65J1.70 1.5511.59 1.70 1.69 1.74 1.88 1.94 1.30 1.65 APPENDIX E 79 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-l-E Bessemer Open Hearth 1.85 1.89 l | 1.79 jl. 77 1.93 1.89 No. 1 List Edge 2.00 1.89 1.86 1.75 1.74 1.77 No. 2 1.62 1.67 i 1 1.48 1.55 1.62 1.69 1.84 1.75 1.57 1.67 1.79 1.75 No. 3 1.90 1.60 1 1.54 11.55 I 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.50 1.60 1.65 1.72 1.70 Maxima 1.90 1.89 1.79 1.77 1.93 1.89 2.00 1.89 1.86 1.75 1 1.79 1.77 Minima 1.62 1.60 1.48 1.55 1.60 1.69 1.80 1.50 1.57 1.65 1.72 1.70 Average Avg. 1.84 Avg. 1.67 Avg. 1.65 2.05 2.05 2.02 2.07 2.27 2.20 2.05 1.95 1.85 1.85 2.05 2.12 Avg. 2.04 1.90 1.84 1.63 1.57 1.68 1.87 1.96 1.96 1.85 1.74 1.85 2.00 Avg. 1.82 1.85 1.87 1.82 1.82 1.75 1.70 1.94 1.83 1.92 1.91 1.83 3.51 Avg. 2.00 2.05 2.05 2.02 2.07 2.27 i 2.20 2.05 1.96 1.92 1.91 2.05 3.51 1.85 1.84 1.63 1.57 1.68 1.70 1.94 1.83 1.85 1.74 1.83 2.00 1.93 1.92 1.98 1.91 1.82 1.87 1.82 1.90 1.83 1.91 1.92 2.54 Maximum 2.00 Minimum 1 . 48 Average 1 . 72 3.51 1.57 1.95 50 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-4-E Bessemer Open Hearth 1.93 1.88 1.78 1.66 1.71 1.79 No. 1 List Edge 1.66 1.55 1.53 1.46 1.46 1.50 No. 2 1.53 1.45 1:38 1.41 1.45 1.42 1.66 1.62 1.56 1.62 1.75 1.73 No. 3 1.65 1.50 1.39 1.28 1.45 1.49 1.76 1.75 1.54 1.40 1.47 1.55 Maxima 1.93 1.88 1.78 1.66 1.71 1.79 1.76 1.75 1.56 1.62 1.75 1.73 Minima 1.53 1.45 1.38 1.28 1.45 1.42 1.66 1.55 1.53 1.40 1.46 1.50 Average 1.70 1.61 1.52 1.45 1.54 1.57 1.69 1.64 1.54 1.49 1.56 1.59 Avg. 1.66 Avg. 1.55 Avg. 1.52 1.96 1.86 1.81 1.87 1.97 1.89 i 1.82 1.72 1.63 1.62 1.72 1.77 Avg. 1.80 1.69 1.59 1.50 1.46 1.49 1.56 1.93 1.76 1.66 1.66 1.62 1.70 Avg. 1.64 1.63 1.64 1.56 1.56 1.58 1.64 1.74 1.78 1.77 1.74 1.70 1.76 Avg. 1.68 1.96 1.86 1.81 1.87 1.97 1.89 1.83 1.78 1.77 1.74 1.72 1.77 1.63 1.59 1.50 1.46 1.49 1.56 1.74 1.72 1.63 1.62 1.62 1.70 1.76 1.70 1.66 1.63 1.68 1.70 1.83 1.73 1 1.69 1.67 l 1.68 1.74 1 Maximum 1 . 93 Minimum 1 . 28 Average 1 . 58 1.97 1.46 1.71 APPENDIX E 81 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Z-l-E Bessemer Open Hearth 1.72 1.64 1.71 1 1 1.73 1.82 1.90 No. 1 List Edge 1.75 1.60 1.61 1.60 1.65 1.78 No. 2 1.92 1.74 1.56 1.60 1.78 1.81 1.88 1.83 1.74 1.77 1.88 1.85 No. 3 1.70 1.72 1.67 1.59 1.57 1.62 1.68 1.57 1.53 1.57 1.55 1.63 Maxima 1.92 1.74 1.71 1.73 1.82 1.90 1.88 1.83 1.74 1.77 1.88 1.85 Minima 1.70 1.64 1.56 1.59 1.57 1.62 1.68 1.57 1.53 1.57 1.55 1.63 Average 1.78 1.70 1.65 1.64 1.72 1.78 1.77 1.67 1.63 1.65 1.69 1.75 Avg. 1.71 Avg. 1.78 Avg. 1.63 1.95 1.95 1.87 1.95 2.15 2.18 1.82 1.85 1.88 11.88 1.95 2.10 1.96 1.83 1.64 1.50 1.57 1.74 2.01 2.00 1.75 1.72 1.76 1.81 1.83 1.83 1.80 1.76 1.75 1.73 1.87 1.78 1.74 1.70 1.72 1.62 1.96 1.95 1.87 1.95 2.15 2.18 2.01 2.00 1.88 1.88 1.95 2.10 1.83 1.83 1.64 1.50 1.57 1.73 1.82 1.78 1.74 1.70 1.72 1.62 1.91 1.87 1.77 1.74 1.82 1.88 1.90 1.88 1.79 1.77 1.81 1.84 Avg. 1.96 Avg. 1.77 Avg. 1.76 Maximum 1 . 92 Minimum 1 . 53 Average 1 . 70 2.18 1.50 1.83 82 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-l-F Bessemer No. 1 List Edge No. 2 2.35 2.10 270fr 1.99 T79T 1799" 2727 2719" 2732" Avg. 2.15 T7ZI 2730 2.19)2.08 2.14 1.95 2707 1t90 T776" ItTI T76tT «9" Avg. 1.97 No. 3 1.65 1.52 im 2700" 1.56 1765" T76T 1779" 1775 27T2" 27~LT 272T Avg. 1.83 Maxima 2735" 230" 27T9" 2711 2708" 1735- 2707 T799" 2727 2719- 276T %7§2r Minima 1.65 1.52 1.56 1.64 1.75 1.60 1.89 2.00 1.65 1.79 1.74 1.69 Average 2710" 2D0 1.9411.88 1.90 1.93 2.12 2707 1781 1781 2702 Maximum 2.64 Minimum 1 . 52 Average 1 . 98 2709- T759" Open Hearth 1. '/oil. 63 1.641.741 1.84 1.9812. 12)2.18 1.95 2.13 2.11 Avg. 1.89 1.57! 1.62:1.78 1.86 1.571.631.76 1.85 1.92 i 2. 00 i Avg. j 1.80 1.95 2.07 27H7 ?m T794" 1792- 1.90 1.88 1789 1797 1 . 80 i 1 . 78 Avg. 1.87 1.70 1.63 27ttr 1 . 94 1 . 90 2700- 1.92 1 1.89 1.98,2.12 lr97- 2rl& 27ir 2tH- 1.57 1.621.63 1.861.80 1.78 1.57 1.631.76 1785- 1770" 1763- 1.75,1.77 1.77 1.91 1.95:1.99 IrTir IrTtf 1t83- 1.93 1 . 93 | 1 . 94 -2718- 1.57 1.85 APPENDIX E 83 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-2-F No. 1 List Edge No. 2 Y33 ^29 27TS "27^3 Bessemer 27TS -2733 2705" 2723 T7S8" T-SB" 1 . 971 1 . 84 Avg. 2.13 1787 ±m TT82 ±t7§ T77t ±r6$ T785- T797 1.77 2.06 27T6~ -2r2T Avg. 1.92 No. 3 T77T l79tf 1766" T7T9 1.5b|1.59 1.64 1.72 T795" Trm T7& 276T Avg. 1.87 Maxima 2.33 2.18,2.18 2.05 1.97 2.16 tfm 2.43 2.33 2t23- ^m 2-ef- Minima 1.71 1.66 1.55 1.59 T79tr T7T9- T764" T772 T7B8" T79T T78o~ T78T Average 179T ^m T7S9" 2r6f} 1.84 1.83 1.93 2.05 ±t89- tt9t Maximum 2.67 Minimum 1 . 55 Average 1 . 92 IrTt} T733- 236" 2.33] 2.48 Open Hearth 2.571 2.43! 2.27 2.261 2.18 XT8 27U9 2.01 "2703" Avg. 2.27 1.96i 2.20i 2.37 1.97 2.181 2.42 276U 2t5S "2767 "2767 2719 274K Avg. 2.38 T779" 1784- 1.7911.69 1.75 1.9712.05 1.82 1.79 T774- T7S5" T793" Avg. 1.83 2.36 2.57 2.43 2.60 2.67i2.49 "233 "2748" 2t42 2758 -27671-2748- 1.79 1.79 1.69 1.75 1.97 2.01 1.84 1.82 1.79 1.74 1.85J1.93 ! 2.04.2.15 2.16 ; 2.2li2. 271 2.18 2.05i2.16;2.16i2.17 2.2012.15 "276T 1.69 2.16 34 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-l-F Bessemer Open Hearth 2.18 2.16 2.13 2.15 2.30 2.42 No. 1 List Edge 1.93 1.90 1.86 1.82 1.99 2.20 No. 2 2.38 2.02 1.72 1.81 1.84 2.23 2.65 2.25 2.12 2.05 2.15 2.32 No. 3 2.08 2.04 1.74 1.66 1.75 2.01 2.20 2.20 i 1.90 j 1.86 1.92 2.16 Maxima 2.38 2,16 2.13 2.15 2.30 2.42 2.65 2.25 2.12 2.05 2.15 2.32 Minima 2.08 2.02 1.72 1.66 1.75 2.01 1.93 1.90 1.86 1.82 1.92 2.16 Average 2.21 2.07 1.86 1.87 1.96 2.22 2.26 2.12 1.96 1.91 2.02 2.23 Avg. 2.09 Avg. 2.13 Avg. 1.96 1.84 1.78 1.90 1.93 1.93 2.15 1.97 1.72 1.82 1.92 1.91 2.12 2.02 1.98 1.91 1.94 1.85 1.74 2.06 1.99 2.04 1.94 1.98 1.76 2.39 2.21 2.00 1.85 1.82 1.84 2.32 2.20 2.00 1.90 2.00 2.00 2.39 2.21 2.00 1.94 1.93 2.15 2.32 2.20 2.04 1.94 2.00 2.12 1.84 1.78 1.90 1.85 1.82 1.74 1.97 1.72 1.82 1.90 1.91 1.76 2.08 1.96 1.94 1.91 1 1.87 1.91 2.12 1.97 1.95 1.92 l 1.96 2.06 Avg. 1.90 Avg. 1.93 Avg. 2.04 Maximum 2 . 65 Minimum 1 . 66 Average 2 . 06 2.39 1.72 1.97 APPENDIX E 85 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-3-F Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge No. 2 No. 3 Maxima Minima Average 1.86 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.72 1.84 1.95 1.89 1.80 1.97 1.93 2.01 1.90 1.82 1.88 1.88 1.97 2.14 1.81 1.69 1.73 1.73 1.84 2.11 2.32 2.00 1.95 1.84 1.95 2.09 2.19 1.88 1.70 1.83 1.92 2.10 2.32 2.00 1.95 1.88 1.97 2.14 2.19 1.89 1.80 1.97 1.93 2.11 1.86 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.72 1.84 1.81 1.69 1.70 1.73 1.84 2.01 2.03 1.84 1.86 1.84 1.88 2.02 1.98 1.82 1.71 1.84 1.89 2.07 Avg. 1.85 1.8 Avg. 1.98 2.32 2.12 2.04 2.19 2.25 2.60 2.23 2.16 2.12 2.45 2.45 2.55 1.96 1 . 89 1 1 . 92 1.88 1.94 2.00 1.83 1.71 1.69 | 1.72 1.84 2.01 2.07 ! 2.05 12.00 2.07 2.09 2.12 2.04 1.96 1.94 1.89 1.91 2.04 2.32 2.12 2.04 2.19 2.25 2.60 2.23 2.16 2.12 2.45 2.45 2.55 1.96 1.89 1.92 1.88 1.94 2.00 1.83 1.71 1.69 1.72 1.84 2.01 2.12 i 2.02 1.99 2.05 2.09 2.24 2.03 1.94,1.91 ,2.02 l i i 2.06J2.20 Avg. 2.29 Avg. 1.87 Avg. 2.02 Maximum 2 . 32 Minimum 1 . 69 Average 1 . 90 2.60 1.69 2.06 86 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE. SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-l-F Bessemer Open Hearth 1.54 1.51 1.67 1.86 2.13 2.21 No. 1 List Edge 1.41 1.43 1.46 1.54 1.73 1.90 No. 2 1.34 1.45 1.48 1.62 1.86 1.83 1.45 1.38 1.52 1.69 1.88 2.08 No. 3 2.16 1 . 98 1 1 . 84 1.67 1.48 1.57 2.40 j 2.21 1.91 1.60 i 1.50 1.62 Maxima 2.16 1.98 1 . 84 1 . 86 2.13 2.21 2.40 2.21 1.91:1.69 1.88 2.08 Minima 1.34 1.45 1.48 1.62 1.48 1.57 1.41 1.38 1.46 1.54 1.50 1.62 Average 1.68 1.65 1.66 1.72 1.82 1.87 1.75 1.67 1.63 1.61 1.70 1.87 Avg. 1.69 Avg. 1.63 Avg. 1.83 1 1 2.14 1.97 2.00 2.01 2.09 2.08 ! 1 1 i 2.06 1.98 2.10 2.05 2.10 2.02 2.30 2.07 1.96 1.84 1.85 1.93 2.54 2.29 2.13 1,97 2.04 2.09 1,99 2.00 1.97 2.00 2.01 1.90 2.07 1.95 1.97 1.90 1.97 1.95 2.30 2.07 2.00 2.01 2.09 2.08 2.54 2.29 2.13 2.05 2.10 2.09 1.99 1.97 1.96 1.84 1.85 1.90 « j 2.06 j 1.95 1.97 1 . 90 j 1 . 97 1.95 2.15 2.02 1.98 1 . 93 1 . 97 1.99 1 2.30 j 2. 02 2 . 07 j 1 . 98 j 2 . 04 j 2 . 02 Avg. 2.05 Avg. 2.08 Avg. 1.89 Maximum 2 . 40 Minimum 1 . 34 Average 1 . 72 2.54 1.84 2.02 APPENDIX E 87 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-4-F Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge No. 2 1.68 1.59 1.56 1.79 1.96 2.27 1.51 1.51 1.55 1.73 1.77 1.88 Avg. 1.73 2.18 2.11 2.01 1.94 1.89 1.76 2.10 2.09 2.21 2.30 2.16 2.10 Avg. 2.07 No. 3 2.15 1.99 1.86 1.77 1.68 1.68 2.00 1.98 1.98 2.08 2.04 1.85 Maxima 2.18 2.11 2.01 1.94 1.96 2.27 2.10 2.09 2.21 2.30 2.16 2.10 Minima 1.68 1.59 1.56 1 . 77 1 . 68 1.68 1.51 1.51 1.55 1.73 1.77 1.85 Average 2.00 1.90 1.81 1.83 1.84 1.90 1.87 1.86 1.91 2.04 1.99 1.94 Avg. 1.92 Maximum 2.30 Minimum 1.51 Average 1.91 2.30 2.05 2.28 2.33 2.29 2.39 i i 1.90 2.08 1.97 1.97 2.15 2.17 2.24 1 2.25 2.15 2.11 2.04 2.00 2.25 2.28 2.23 2.25 2.17 2.04 2.21 2.17 2.13 2.11 2.07 2.07 2.24 2.10 1.98 1.97 1.93 1.97 2.30 2.25 2.28 2.33 2.29 2.39 2.25 2.28 2.23 2.25 2.17 2.17 2.21 2.05 2.13 2.11 2.04 2.00 1.90 2.08 1.97 1.97 1.93 1.97 2.28 2.16 2.19 2.18 | 2.1312.15 2.13 2.15 2.06 2.06 2.08 2.03 Avg. 2.15 Avg 2.17 Avg. 2.08 2.39 1.90 2.14 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Z-l-F Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge No. 2 No. 3 Maxima Minima 1.92 1.85 1.85 1.91 2.19 2.53 2.64 1.93 2.05 2.25 2.47 2.45 2.23 1.87 1.66 1.55 1 . 53 1 . 57 2.22 1.94 1.64 1.55 1 1.38 1.59 2.27 2.05 1.83 1.60 1.59 1.57 2.36 2.20 1.85 1.56 1.45 1.50 2.27 2.05 1.91 2.19 2.53 2.04 2.36 2.20 2.05 2.25 2.47 2.45 1.92 1.85 1.66 1.55 1.53 1.57 1.85 1.93 1.64 1.55 1.38 1.50 Avg. 2.17 Avg. 1.73 Avg. 1.82 Average 2.14 1.92 1.80 1.78 1.88 1.93 2.14 2.02 1.85 1.79 1.77 1.85 2.16 2.10 2.09 2.15 2.33 2.60 2.54 2.43 2.22 2.00J1.94 1.98 Avg. 2.21 2.04 1.96 2.07 1.97 2.07 1.96 1.81 1.91 2.01,2.03 1.93 1.96 Avg. 1.97 1.97 2.02 1.91 1.84 1.76 1.75 2.00 1 . 92 1.85 | 1.84 1.81 1.91 2.16 2.10 2.09 2.15 2.33|2.60 2.54 2.43 2.22 2.03 i 1.94,1.98 i 1.97 2.02 1.91 1.84 1 . 76 J 1 . 75 1.96 1.92 1.85 1.84 1.81 1.91 2.06 2.06 2.02 1.98 1.97 2.09 2.17 2.11 2.03 1.96 1.89J1.95 Av£ 1.8 Maximum 2 . 64 Minimum 1 . 38 Average 1.91 2.60 1.75 2.02 APPENDIX E 39 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-l-G Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge No. 2 2.73 2.33 2.27 2.45 2.70 2.72 2.70 2.69 2.65 2.85 2.95 2.71 Avg. 2.65 4.50 3.49 5.09 3.88 5.48 5.45 4.1713.82 5.17 4.60 3.58 3.40 Avg. 4.39 No. 3 Maxima Minima Average 4.36 5.10 5.60 5.70 5.40 4.90 3.25 3.75 4.10 3.90 3.73 3.35 4.50 5.10 5.60 5.70 5.40 4.90 3.49 3.88 4.17 1 3.90 3.73 ,3.40 2.73 "1 2.33 2.27 2.45 2.70 2.72 2.70 2.69 2.65 2.85 2.95 2.71 3.86 4.17 4.45 4.53 4.4214.07 3.15 3.44 3.64 3.52 3.42 3.15 Avg. 4.43 4.05 4.18 4.17 3.98 3.83 3.45 4.23 5.68 5.98 5.99 5.18 3.02 4.13 4.68 4.94 5.14 4.95 4.51 3.98 4.19 4.13 3.95 3.70 3.60 3.80 4.70 5.01 5.04 5.06 4.25 3.69 4.06 4.07 3.85 3.60 3.24 4.13 4.70 5.01 5.14 5.06 4.51 4.23 5.68 5.98 5.99 5.18 3.60 3.80 4.18 4.17 3.98 3.83 3.45 3.69 4.06 4.07 i i i 3.8513.60 3.02 3.99 4.52 4.71 4.72 i . 4.61 4.07 3.97 4.64 4.73 4.59 4.16 3.29 Avg. 4.37 Avg. 4.33 Avg. 4.20 Maximum 5.70 Minimum 2 . 27 Average 3 . 82 5.99 3.02 4.30 90 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE W-2-G Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge No. 2 3.19 3.47 3.01 3.59 3.50 2.98 4.76 5.40 5.48 5.37 4.63 3.65 Avg. 4.13 131 X24 ^570T 73753 X3S "3772 75732 73782 7d737d ~375T ¥745" Avg. 4.26 No. 3 Maxima 4.31 5.01 5.38 5.52 5.35 4.45 4776" To74tT 5.48 5.37 ^763 3765- Minima 3.19 3.47 3.01 3.59 3.50 2.98 3.24 3.53 3.72 3.82 3.51 3.33 Average 3.75 4.24 4.20 4.55 4.43 3.67 4.00 4.46 4.60 4.59 4.07 3.49 Maxi mum b 52 Minimum 2.98 Average 4.18 3.64(3.61 3.29 2.87I2.80| 2.95 3.03 3.03 2.91 2 • Avg. 3.07 4.521 5.31| 5.63 5.47, 5.37 4.84 73772 -47T3 4.25| 3.94 3774 3765" Avg. 4.55 4.10 4.78 5.25|4.94 4.58 4.15 3.83 4.16 4.08|3.30 3.25 3.20 4.52,5.31 5.63 5.47 5.37 4.84 3.83] 4. 16 4.25 3.94 3.74 3.65 3.64 3.61 3.2912.87 1 2.8012.95 3.03 3.03 2. 91|2. 94)2.89,2. 93 4.09 4.57 4.72 4.43 4.25 3.98 3.53 3.77 3.7b 3.39 3.29)3.26 i 1 •: Avg. 4.13 75763" 2.80 3.92 APPENDIX E 91 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-l-G Bessemer Open Hearth No. 1 List Edge No. 2 2r 84 2.7( Srm SrMltti- 3.05 3.15 3.01 2.81 2.73 2.80 Avg. 2.74 2.53 2.15 2,36 2.26 2^42 2,38- 2,19'2.28 -2^44- 2-J6 2,40 Avg. 2.36 3.48 3.56 3.93 3.87 - 4.13 3.61 3.45 1.68 ! 1.78 1.75 4.65 3.77 Avg. 4.06 3t7-& 4^26- 4^60- 4^62- 3.12 3 , 23 3.42 1 3,67 3.76 3.70 1.35 1.13 Avg, 3.8£ No. 3 3.50 4.30 4-^50 2.80 2. 00 1 2.96 4~r60 4r35 3.14 3.12 -3^90- -3^-06- Avg. 3.60 Maxima &m 4.3014.50 1.60 3 . 05 3,15 ! 3,04 3,14 3,12 3.90 4. 35 13.90 Minima 2r53- -2r45- -2t42 2^20- 2.36 2.26'2.10 2.28 2. 4 6 2. 4 2r36" 2t46" Average 2M -&r±7- 3t4± -3^-oe 2.71 2.77 2.73 2.75 2.67 1 2.75 3.05 3.02 -3t45 ■3t24 -3-08- -3^47- 2-94- 2rSl- 2.02 l 2.92 ■2-79 ■2^90- 2.60'2.70 Avg. 2.94 3.70 4 .26 ±rm 4^62 3.45 4.68 4.78 4.75 4.65 3.77 4t35 ^h43- ■3tt5- -3t±2 -3-08- -2t94- 3.17 2.92 2.81 2.79 2.90 j I j 2.92 1 2.60 1 2.70 -3r44 -3-t6S -3tS2 -arff 3.27 3.60 3.71 3^ 78 3.67 1 3.39 3.76 3.55 Maximum 4 . 60 Minimum 2.16 Average 2 . 90 4.78 2.60 3.62 92 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE X-3-G Bessemer Open Hearth 2.60 2.28 2.02 2.15 2.30 2.50 No. 1 List Edge 2.50 2.33 2.23 2.47 2.50 2.37 No. 2 4.33 4.89 5.16 5.05 4.83 4.44 3.80 3.67 3.70 3.59 3.34 3.24 No. 3 2.80 2.60 2.46 2.70 2.81 2.74 2.60 2.40 2.10 2.24 2.50 2.34 Maxima 4.33 4.89 5.16 5.05 4.83 4.44 3.80 3.67 3.70 3.59 3.34 3.24 Minima 2.60 2.28 2.02 2.15 2.30 2.50 2.50 2.33 2.10 2.24 2.50 2.34 Average 3.24 2.97 3.26 2.80 3.21 2.68 3.30 2.77 3.31 2.78 3.23 2.65 Avg. 3.87 4.15 4.05 3.80 3.17 3.51 Avg 4.35 Avg. 2.35 ! 1 j : 3.90 4.80 5.30 5.45 5.40 4.82 Avg. 4.62 4.93 5.10 5.12 4.71 4.10 4.17 3.46 3.91 3.88 3.65 3.31 3.05 4.15 Avg. 3.72 4.42 4.77 4.7514.66 4.10 Avg. 2.52 2.96 3.28 3.28 3.50 3.4713.17 3.84 4.62 4.93 5.10 5.12 4.71;4.10 1 3.90 4.80 5.30 5.45 5.40 4.82 3.72 4.15 4.05 i 3.80 3.1713,51 2.96 3.28 3.28 3.50i 3.31 3.05 4.07 3.44 1 4.50 4.64 4. 564. 18 3.90 1 3.99 4.15'4.20i4.06 3.68 1 ! 1 Maximum 5.16 Minimum 2.02 Average 3.01 5.45 2.96 4.11 APPENDIX E 93 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-l-G Bessemer Open Hearth 2.88 2.45 2.30 2.57 2.93 3.05 Avg. 2.73 Avg. 2.56 Avg. 2.38 3.15 2.85 3.06 3.56 3.30 4.00 Avg. No. 1 List Edge 2.90 2.59 2.69 2.67 2.83 2.84 3.07 3.15 3.34 3.35 3.40 3.20 3.32 No. 2 2.62 2.66 2.68 2.57 2.61 2.65 2.92 3.08 3.03 3.03 2.87 2.79 Avg. 2.92 2.49 2.28 2.19 2.37 2.63 3.36 3.41 3.21 2.78 2.61 2.69 2.98 No. 3 2.40 2.26 2.37 2.49 2.73 2.74 3.25 3.16 3.15 3.18 3.15 2.91 Avg. 2.42 2.20 2.02 2.10 2.29 2.50 1 2.99 3.01 2.89 2.74 2.65 2.71 2.98 Maxima 2.88 2.66 2.68 2.57 2.93 3.05 3.25 3.16 3.15 3.56 3.80 4.00 2.92 2.59 2.69 2.67 2.83 2.84 3.36 3.41 3.34 3.35 3.40 3.20 Minima 2.40 2.26 2.30 2.49 2.61 2.65 2.92 2.85 3.03 3.03 2.87 2.79 2.42 2.20 2.02 2.10 2.29 2.50 2.99 3.01 2.89 2.74 2.61 2.69 Average 2.63 2.46 2.45 2.54 2.79 2.81 3.11 3.03 3.08 3.26 3.27 3.23 2.75 2.43 2.33 2.32 2.49 2.66 3.14 3.22 3.15 2.96 2.89 2.87 Maximum Minimum Average 3.05 2.02 2.56 4.00 2.61 3.09 94 APPENDIX E VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Y-4-G Bessemer Open Hearth 2.88 2.50 2.31 2.74 2.82 2.71 No. 1 List Edge 2.59 2.66 2.75 2.90 1 2.79 2.75 No. 2 2.72 2.86 2.67 2.61 2.55 2.74 2.29 2.37 2.37 2.17 2.27 2.48 No. 3 2.80 2.77 2.37 2.69 2.84 2.92 2.84 2.55 2.22 2.33 2.68 2.99 Maxima 2.88 2.86 2.67 2.74 2.84 2.92 2.84 2.66 2.75 2.90 2.79 2.99 Minima 2.72 2.50 2.31 2.61 2.55 2.71 2.29 2.37 2.22 2.17 2.27 2.48 Avg. 2.70 Avg. 2.51 Avg. 2.66 Average 2.80 2.72 2.45 2.68 2.74 2.79 2.57 2.53 2.45 2.47 2.58 2.74 ! 3.13J 3. 11| 3. 16 3.34 3.42 3.16 : 3.52 4.01 4.24 4.46 4.22 3.70 3.33 3.2313.09 i 1 2.87 2.86 3.01 3.6513. 39! 2.94|2. 61 2.99 3.23 3.54 3.03 4.05 1 4.07 3.80 3.62 3.27 3.55 3.20 2.97 2.87 3.01 3.54 3.23 4.05 4.07 3.80 3.62 3.654. 01 4.24 4.46 4.22 3.70 3.13 3.03 3.09 2.87 2.86 3.01 3.27 3.39 2.94 2.61 2.87 3.01 3.33 3.12 3.43 3.43 3.36 3.26 3.48, 3.65 3.46,' 3.35 i i 3.36,3.31 Avg. 3.62 Avg. 3.10 Avg. 3.42 Maximum 2 . 99 Minimum 2.17 Average 2 . 63 4.46 2.61 3.38 APPENDIX E 95 VARIATIONS IN TIN COATING ON SINGLE SHEETS, WEIGHT EXPRESSED IN POUNDS PER BASE BOX— Continued PLATE Z-l-G Bessemer Open Hearth 3.43 3.21 2.68 2.40 2.38 2.61 No. 1 List Edge 3.00 3.01 2.90 2.59 2.58 2.61 No. 2 4.11 4.70 5.66 4.73 4.54 4.16 3.47 3.65 3.50 3.28 3.18 2.94 No. 3 3.70 4.62 4.76 4.87 5.10 4.15 3.20 3.99 3.42 3.40 3.05 2.99 Maxima 4.11 4.70 5.66 4.87 5.10 4.16 3.47 3.99 3.50 3.40 3.18 2.99 Minima 3.43 3.21 2.68 2.40 2.38 2.61 3.00 3.01 2.90 2.59 2.58 2.61 Average 3.75 4.18 4.37 4.00 4.01 3.64 3.22 .3.55 3.27 3.09 2.94 2.85 Avg. 2.78 Avg. 3.99 Avg. 3.94 2.77 3.16 3.22 2.93 2.97 2.66 2.88 2.88 1 2. 93j2.91j2.98j3.il ! 4.37 5.34 ; i 5. 8715. 8915.71 1 I 4.65 3.93 4.14 4. 09 ! 3. 9313.87 3.67 2.57 2.80 2.57 2.57 l • 2.51 2.63 2.94 3.01 2.72 2.46 2.43 2.83 4.37 5.34 5.875.89 i 5.71 4.65 3.93 4.14 4.09 3.93 3 87 3.67 2.57 2.8012.57 2.57 2.. 51 2.63 2.88 2.8812.72 i i 2.46J2.43J2.83 3.24 3.77 3.89 3. 80J3. 7313.31 ! 3.25 3.34 3.25 3.10 3. 09 ! 1 3.20 Avg. 2.95 Avg. 4.62 Avg. 2.67 Maximum 5 . 66 Minimum 2.38 Average 3 . 57 5.89 2.43 3.41 APPENDIX F APPENDIX F— WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON INDIVIDUAL CANS AT DIFFERENT INSPECTIONS WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS First Inspection, December 1, 1915 W-l-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples l l / 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans .' 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2 J / 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) %y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin l]/ 2 Michigan Pumpkin l]/ 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes %y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes . . . ?> l / 2 Tuna Fish 3 96 Can No. Body No. 1 ruunus per x> Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .83 .75 .81 2 .79 .88 .70 15 .59 .66 .81 .84 16 .80 .80 .79 .62 21 .90 .79 .71 .82 22 .70 .66 .86 .88 45 .73 .66 .80 .93 46 .71 .69 .72 .72 1 .75 .66 .68 .81 2 .69 .71 .67 .70 1 .75 .91 1.05 2 .83 .95 .86 22 .92 . . . .86 23 .70 . . . .95 24 .70 .88 26 .82 .90 27 .95 .85 1 .79 .85 '.80 .78 2 .80 .76 .77 .79 3 .78 .81 .77 .80 4 .78 .81 .79 1.00 5 .76 .77 .86 .84 35 .81 .86 .79 .88 39 .73 .75 .80 .79 40 .73 .65 ..97 .80 41 .83 1.08 1.01 1.04 42 .96 .97 .77 .79 10 .85 .88 .86 12 1.00 1.02 .77 21 .96 .87 .95 23 .76 ' .87 .95 24 .73 .83 .88 1 .82 .77 .79 .90 2 .87 .90 .81 .79 1 .80 .78 .83 2 .86 .87 .79 1 .79 .73 .94 .91 2 .73 .79 .79 .83 3 .87 .83 .85 .86 4 .75 .76 .78 .68 5 .98 .93 .76 .73 6 .90 .73 .97 .90 21 .69 .73 .80 22 .83 .78 .80 1 .89 .81 .75 .85 2 .82 .96 .77 .73 21 .66 .73 .76 22 .68 .81 .70 1 .65 .73 .75 2 • .80 .83 .78 1 .65 .75 .70 2 1.20 .70 .73 1 .86 .78 .90 2 .78 .80 .79 40 1.64 1.57 Lost Lost APPENDIX F 97 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued W-2-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples 1J4 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider iy 2 Clam Juice 2j4 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2 1 /. Maine Corn (Side) 2 r / 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \ T /2 Michigan Pumpkin 1^2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3^2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3^ Tuna Fish 3 Can No. 1 Body No. .75 — Pounds per 1 Body No. 2 Base Box — Top .88 Bottom .70 2 .58 ... .84 .78 1 .66 .61 .69 .60 2 .60 .64 .73 .59 10 .69 .68 .77 .69 11 .73 .73 .84 .71 21 .70 .79 .72 .84 22 .63 .63 .84 .80 1 .74 .65 .83 .75 2 .72 .78 .98 .83 1 .80 1.10 1.10 2 .77 .85 .87 21 .85 .77 25 .74 .83 26 .73 .76 27 .81 .83 28 .73 .79 1 .91 .85 .84 .97 2 .70 .72 .80 .88 3 .74 .71 Lost .87 4 .72 • .77 .80 .83 5 .66 .80 .99 .79 35 1.00 .93 1.00 .86 39 .60 .71 .96 .98 42 .80 .79 .88 .90 43 .81 .76 .80 .93 44 .80 .83 .93 1.02 12 .73 .95 Lost 17 .77 .93 1.03 22 .74 .77 .97 23 .77 .92 .96 24 .86 .87 .98 1 .72 '.74 .83 .87 2 .85 1.00 .88 .79 1 .62 .83 .68 2 .77 .83 .78 1 ' .74 .68 .79 .90 2 .70 .66 .87 .92 3 .78 .76 .93 .84 4 .66 .74 .84 .76 5 .78 .87 1.00 .97 6 .74 .86 .93 .74 13 .83 .84 .94 14 .69 .85 .85 1 .89 .91 .82 .98 2 .72 .69 .95 .78 16 .73 .83 .83 19 .60 .87 .75 1 .68 .70 .90 2 .71 .89 .83 1 .80 1.00 .93 2 .60 .88 .86 1 .95 .79 .83 2 .80 .98 .80 6 .71 .83 .66 .67 15 1.29 1.40 .80 .94 98 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915— r-Continued X-l-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples \y 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2y Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) 2y 2 Condensed Milk ...:.... 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 2>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 2>y> Tuna Fish 3 Can No. 1 Body No. 1 .74 ruunuti pel x> Body No. 2 asc jdua — Top .97 Bottom .73 2 .69 .78 .79 13 .51 .62 .67 .66 14 .62 .69 .78 .52 21 .78 .73 .73 .81 22 .73 .69 .74 .75 21 .81 .94 .68 .72 24 .86 .75 .78 .75 1 .70 .68 .74 .72 2 .64 .69 .71 .78 1 .73 .73 .85 2 .79 .73 .78 21 .75 1.02 22 .77 . . . .79 25 .65 .93 27 .70 . . . .77 28 .73 .75 1 .85 .78 .83 .67 2 .74 .70 .84 .86 3 .74 .73 .82 .87 4 .70 .80 .79 .92 5 .77 .76 .66 .87 41 .67 .68 .69 .78 42 .69 .63 .84 .98 43 .83 .73 .77 .77 44 .80 .77 .90 .92 45 .70 .70 .79 .68 19 .79 .86 .82 20 .75 .81 .83 22 .93 .80 .80 23 .90 .88 .86 24 .80 .86 .83 1 .78 .81 .80 .76 2 . .80 .78 .73 .73 1 .64 .70 .80 2 .63 .82 .77 1 .56 .65 .82 .77 2 .82 .99 .81 .68 3 1.17 .80 .86 .75 4 .61 .58 .97 .98 5 .87 .82 .95 .89 6 .71 .74 .69 .87 21 .70 . . . .72 .79 22 .70 1.00 .80 1 .69 .75 .82 .87 2 .74 .74 .73 .80 15 .69 .70 .70 16 .71 .82 .75 1 .73 .75 .74 2 .67 .76 .76 1 .80 .70 .85 2 .65 .75 .78 1 .79 .69 .70 2 .70 .73 .77 1 .65 .73 .75 .88 2 .68 .65 .73 1.30 APPENDIX F 99 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-3-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples V/z New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2^2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn : 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2>4 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin 1^2 Michigan Pumpkin. l}/2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3J^ New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 L UU11UD \JKZL JJ Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .81 .86 .86 2 .70 .70 .87 7 .63 .66 .62 .76 10 .63 .70 .70 .70 23 .83 .75 .81 .69 24 .80 .85 .89 .68 45 1.02 .90 .73 .73 46 .76 .78 .66 .79 1 .78 .93 .78 .78 2 .77 .86 .82 .71 1 .70 .87 .87 2 .77 .78 .80 21 .90 .78 25 .73 .88 26 .88 • • • .75 27 .83 .86 28 .94 .87 1 .83 .84 '.87 .85 2 .83 .82 .92 .76 3 1.29 1.18 .82 .83 4 .77 .83 .90 .87 5 .97 .87 .87 .85 41 .96 .79 .83 .95 42 .81 .85 .82 .87 43 .83 .88 .87 .85 44 1.04 1.07 .96 .88 45 .87 .85 .79 .82 20 .77 .87 .79 21 .82 .92 .83 22 1.05 .94 .85 23 .92 .88 .95 24 .80 .87 1.06 1 .85 .86 .79 .76 2 .88 .87 .93 .85 1 .79 .69 .73 2 .82 .73 .90 1 .92 .90 .78 .86 2 .83 .73 .85 .77 3 .86 .87 .84 .82 4 .71 .69 .90 .70 5 .81 .77 .77 .71 6 .78 .86 .95 .69 13 .83 .84 .94 14 .69 .85 .85 1 .74 .83 .81 .84 2 .90 .82 .81 .72 13 .74 .70 .72 18 .78 .80 .78 1 .89 .88 .75 2 .90 .83 1.15 1 .78 .85 .83 2 .55 .76 .78 1 .82 .88 .78 2 .77 .74 .79 1 .83 .86 .69 .95 2 .86 .94 .78 .82 100 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Y-l-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples. ...... l x / 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider . V/ 2 Clam Juice 2^4 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) %y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin l]/ 2 New York Pumpkin 2. Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 2>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3^4 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. 1 Body No. 1 .78 Body No. 2 Top .73 Bottom .85 2 .73 .79 .80 7 .72 .70 .69 .63 12 .73 .66 .77 .71 22 .79 .82 .72 .83 23 .83 .83 .79 .85 25 .75 .83 .71 .78 30 .76 .84 .58 .74 1 .68 .67 .74 .74 2 .71 .80 .78 .71 1 .83 .74 .95 2 .87 • • • 1.05 .85 22 ■ .78 • > • . • • .90 25 .86 • - . ... .80 26 1.00 • • • . . . .85 27 .85 ... .90 28 .78 • • • ... .94 1 .96 .86 1.00 .81 2 .86 .93 '.93 1.13 3 .81 .79 .75 .90 4 .78 .81 .73 .91 5 .62 .57 .83 .87 41 .82 .88 .76 1.02 42 .79 .90 .91 .81 43 .85 .77 .78 .77 44 .76 .88 .71 .90 45 .72 .69 .78 .72 19 .87 .78 .80 21 -.74 .90 .89 22 .75 .80 .77 23 .83 .82 .80 24 .85 .82 .85 1 .88 .80 .74 .80 2 .74 .73 .75 .87 1 .75 .78 .73 2 .78 1.05 .74 1 .88 .75 .75 .79 2 .95 .97 .90 .75 3 .87 .96 .70 .77 4 .87 .80 .71 .71 5 .77 .75 .77 .71 6 .79 .77 .88 .77 21 .76 .85 .70 22 .70 . . > .80 .80 1 .78 .71 .76 .71 2 .82 .76 .74 .85 22 .80 .69 .68 23 .75 ... .83 .80 1 .69 .66 .73 2 .83 .75 .79 1 .76 . . • .75 .75 2 .78 . . . .77 .90 1 .80 . . . 1.10 .89 2 .75 .84 .67 1 .90 .91- .94 .86 2 .79 .80 .86 .72 APPENDIX F 101 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Y-4-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples l l / 2 New York Apples . . 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider \y 2 Clam Juice 2^4 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) %y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 2>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... %y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 ruunuci ^ci j_> Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .69 . . . .98 .77 2 .76 .89 .79 23 .78 .67 .81 .73 24 .65 .71 .74 .84 23 .73 .64 .83 .87 24 .73 .70 .88 .78 45 .76 .80 .72 .87 46 .79 .78 .88 .80 1 .86 .73 .89 .97 2 .72 .68 .88 1.00 1 .90 .98 1.02 2 .89 .90 .86 23 .73 .83 25 .85 • • • .83 26 .80 .80 27 .78 .87 28 .88 .80 1 .87 .96 1.03 .86 2 .85 .81 .97 .85 3 .82 .86 .92 .74 4 .91 .82 .92 .86 41 .79 .81 .85 .86 . 42 .90 .95 .82 .82 43 .94 .94 .73 .87 44 .94 .99 .99 .79 45 .79 .79 .78 1.03 17 .88 .90 .80 18 1.02 .85 .84 21 .93 .90 .88 22 1.02 .87 .83 23 .87 .87 .87 1 .96 .90 1.00 .87 2 .88 .89 .87 .98 1 .82 .93 .78 2 .80 .78 .79 1 .92 .85 .97 .92 2 .92 .87 .81 .82 3 .81 .84 .84 .90 4 .78 .79 .91 .84 5 .82 .82 .96 .81 6 .85 .83 .97 .87 21 .80 ... 1.00 .87 24 .60 .80 .87 1 .82 .76 .87 .89 2 .80 .77 .75 .86 13 .69 .85 .78 14 .74 .86 1.00 1 .90 .80 .83 2 .73 .96 .94 1 .93 .78 .93 2 .82 .85 .78 1 .85 .80 .83 2 .65 .86 .77 1 .85 .82 .78 .73 2 .94 .95 .91 .82 102 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Z-l-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples l J / 2 New York Apples ..... 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider \y 2 Clam Juice 2J^ Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2 l / 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2]/ 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin iy Michigan Pumpkin l J / 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3 T / 2 New Jersey Tomatoes . .'. 2>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 C^a No. Body No. 1 L UUUUB \JKZl J. Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .77 .81 .83 2 .70 .79 .78 19 .82 .80 .88 .77 22 .63 .63 .74 .80 21 .75 .74 .75 .97 22 .69 .72 .78 .80 45 .77 .64 1.44 .66 46 .74 .80 .75 .81 1 .90 .97 .85 .77 2 .82 .76 .82 .72 1 .86 .81 .87 2 .78 .90 .ys 22 .90 .87 25 .83 ... .75 26 .85 .79 27 .83 .86 28 .80 .83 1 .80 .86 .85 .81 2 .80 .82 .80 .93 3 .88 .89 .84 .96 4 .82 .84 .99 .79 5 .81 .81 .93 1.04 39 .77 .87 .73 .93 41 .82 1.02 .83 .64 42 .82 .72 .82 .86 43 .86 .78 .85 .86 44 .76 .79 .99 .77 19 .75 .83 .80 20 .90 . . . .95 1.05 22 .78 .82 .90 23 .77 . . . .98 .75 24 .88 .94 .78 1 .93 .90 .77 .81 2 .85 .88 .99 .91 1 .70 .75 .70 2 .80 .80 .74 1 .89 .95 .85 .92 2 .81 .74 .89 .81 3 .80 .79 .97 .75 4 .78 .73 .83 .77 5 .99 .98 .97 .87 6 .86 .82 .86 .87 22 .63 .87 .77 24 .65 .73 .78 1 .75 .73 .96 .80 2 .89 .86 .82 1.01 23 .87 .95 .84 24 .85 . . , .83 1.03 1 .83 .96 1.06 2 .79 .83 .80 1 .73 .66 .75 2 .99 Lost . .77 A .75 . . . .85 .77 2 .77 .80 .86 1 .81 .78 .80 .79 2 .87 .82 .80 .»9 APPENDIX F 103 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued W-l-B Age Article Months Michigan Apples 1J/2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider iy 2 Clam Juice 2^ Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2>4 Maine Corn (Side) 2^2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin 1^4 Michigan Pumpkin 1^2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3^2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3 J/2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .87 1.12 .78 2 .97 .99 1.20 2 .90 .95 .86 .82 4 .97 .95 .92 .89 9 .73 .87 1.10 .82 10 .76 .89 1.04 1.07 45 .71 .78 .92 .97 46 .97 .97 1.04 .79 1 .73 .68 .97 .92 2 .85 .80 .80 .88 1 1.00 1.05 1.00 2 1.04 1.27 1.00 22 .94 .98 25 1.00 .97 26 1.05 1.10 27 1.12 1.09 28 .98 1.08 1 .75 .94 1.17 1.11 2 88 .91 1.11 .94 3 .97 .96 1.06 1.10 4 .96 .84 1.13 1.06 5 1.10 .92 .97 1.18 40 .92 1.02 1.12 1.02 42 .98 1.04 1.25 1.04 43 .95 .92 1.13 .89 44 .86 .89 1.04 1.06 45 1.06 ' .98 .93 1.15 20 1.06 1.08 .98 21 .97 1.10 .97 22 1.00 .85 1.02 23 .95 1.04 1.08 24 .82 1.07 1.08 1 .99 1.06 1.04 .85 2 . 1.02 .98 1.30 .96 1 .94 1.00 .98 2 .92 1.19 Lost 1 .70 .69 .80 .93 2 .86 .85 1.13 1.02 3 .97 .97 1.02 1.25 4 .86 .76 .86 1.05 5 .99 1.02 1.19 1.09 6 .92 .71 .92 1.16 21 1.15 1.03 1.22 22 1.10 1.19 1.15 1 .81 .86 1.03 .92 2 1.01 .91 1.06 .98 19 1.00 .98 1.14 22 .88 .98 .95 1 .98 .90 .85 2 .98 .93 1.05 1 .82 .93 .77 2 .86 .96 .98 1 1.00 1.09 1.05 2 .98 1.06 1.08 37 .96 .88 .91 1.04 45 .77 .82 1.03 .78 104 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, 'December 1, 1915 — Continued W-2-B Article Months Michigan Apples l J / 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2]/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2 x / 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 Michigan Pumpkin l J / 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 2>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes . .". ?> l / 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .83 .95 1.01 2 .85 1.02 .88 1 .72 .82 .86 .82 2 1.01 .95 1.00 .87 13 .84 .82 .88 1.01 14 .87 .78 1.13 ' 1.12 45 .88 .87 1.03 .99 46 .74 .82 .88 .92 1 1.09 1.00 1.07 1.08 2 .75 .75 .92 1.07 1 .97 1.18 .98 2 1.05 1.12 .97 21 .90 1.03 25 .85 • . • .88 26 .92 1.04 27 1.00 .97 28 1.05 .95 1 1.05 1.00 .91 .85 2 .99 1.10 1.08 .90 3 .98 .88 1.10 1.02 4 .91 .99 .98 Lost 5 1.05 1.02 1.01 1.07 41 .72 .83 .96 1.14 42 .78 .78 1.24 .98 43 .78 .83 .90 .91 44 1.16 1.02 .93 1.16 45 .95 .97 1.02 .99 20 1.04 1.10 .93 21 1.00 1.20 1.05 22 .95 1.13 Lost 23 .95 .92 .87 24 .82 1.15 1.15 1 1.09 .99 .98 .96 2 .99 .90 .93 .93 1 .88 .95 .98 2 .88 .93 1.05 1 .93 .94 1.01 1.00 2 1.09 .98 1.10 1.06 3 1.03 .99 1.08 .90 4 .89 .82 1.04 .99 5 .94 .91 1.04 .94 6 .80 .83 .87 1.12 13 .87 .77 .77 17 .83 .85 .94 1 1.05 1.08 .86 .85 2 .96 .94 .87 .96 19 .93 .95 1.00 22 .97 .93 1.07 1 1.15 1.04 1.06 2 .85 1.12 1.03 1 1.00 .93 .92 2 .98 .97 .90 1 .98 1.00 .83 2 .75 1.13 .95 1 .88 .86 .91 .90 2 .87 .79 .85 .84 APPENDIX F 105 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-l-B Age Article Months Michigan Apples 1^2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider iy 2 Clam Juice %Yi Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2,y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .82 1.09 .98 2 .80 .97 1.03 13 .76 .80 .79 .83 15 .83 .80 1.06 .95 21 .93 .85 .93 .95 22 .99 .89 1.07 1.07 44 .81 .83 .90 .81 45 .81 .77 .87 .79 1 .78 .87 .78 .86 2 1.01 1.13 1.10 .94 1 .87 1.21 1.24 2 .96 1.27 1.18 21 .87 • • ■ 1.14 22 .85 .98 25 .78 .97 27 .74 .99 28 .91 .96 1 .95 .95 1.23 1.06 2 .91 .91 1.00 1.08 3 .88 .76 1.10 1.06 4 1.28 1.08 .99 .79 5 .95 .97 .86 .97 41 1.08 1.07 1.13 1.10 42 1.04 1.23 1.06 .92 43 .95 .80 .89 1.20 44 1.07 .72 .91 1.14 45 1.24 1.13 .92 .98 19 1.03 .92 1.07 20 1.00 1.08 .94 22 .93 1.00 1.08 23 .90 .99 1.06 24 1.18 .97 .83 1 1.15 1.20 1.12 Lost 2 .97 .99 1.05 1.12 1 .94 1.03 .93 2 .88 .97 1.15 1 .78 '.82 .87 .26 2 .98 .99 1.03 1.00 3 .86 .78 .95 .91 4 1.02 .99 .97 .98 5 .98 .98 1.20 1.12 6 .81 .90 .98 .96 23 .80 .90 1.02 24 .96 .89 1.00 1 .83 .85 1.26 .95 2 .76 .81 1.08 .84 15 .91 1.03 1.07 16 1.14 1.00 1.07 1 1.00 1.28 .89 2 .95 1.00 1.15 1 .80 1.08 .90 2 .93 .94 1.00 1 1.10 .93 .94 2 .89 1.02 .99 1 .94 .83 1.12 1.08 2 1.04 1.13 .95 .91 106 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-3-B Age Article Months Michigan Apples 1^2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider iy 2 Clam Juice 2^2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) 2>4 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin I3/2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3 3/2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3 3/2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 ruunub pel _l Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .82 1.23 1.10 2 .90 .87 1.05 9 1.06 .98 1.12 1.01 12 .86 .91 1.01 1.02 23 .91 .93 1.08 1.04 24 1.01 .97 1.18 1.08 23 .91 1.04 1.08 1.08 24 1.12 1.19 1.05 .99 1 1.01 .94 1.08 1.05 2 1.09 .94 1.04 1.00 1 .85 1.12 1.19 2 .83 . . . 1.10 1.22 22 .98 1.02 25 1.02 . . . 1.06 26 .98 . . . 1.02 27 .90 . • • .96 28 .75 . . . ... 1.12 1 .91 .90 1.20 1.23 2 1.01 .92 1.18 1.03 3 .80 .76 1.16 .99 4 1.37 1.14 1.09 1.06 5 .92 .92 1.00 1.06 35 1.06 .99 1.06 1.09 38 1.03 .98 1.08 1.15 39 1.09 1.11 .95 .93 43 .85 .89 1.17 .98 44 1.12 .97 1.23 1.00 19 1.06 1.43 1.30 20 1.12 1.12 1.09 22 1.02 1.08 1.20 23 1.05 1.08 1.13 24 .97 1.17 1.22 1 1.02 1.09 1.13 1.05 2 1.03 1.15 1.17 .85 1 .87 . . . 1.12 1.25 2 .86 1.04 1.10 1 .93 .93 1.20 .97 2 .99 .96 1.30 1.02 3 1.23 1.17 1.36 1.18 4 .99 .82 1.09 1.23 5 1.05 1.09 .97 1.05 6 1.12 1.07 1.25 1.19 21 .68 1.21 .97 22 .70 1.05 1.19 1 .88 .77 1.14 1.01 2 .95 .95 .91 1.08 12 1.17 1.08 1.12 16 .79 1.07 1.10 1 1.03 1.12 1.08 2 .96 .90 1.40 1 .90 1.13 1.04 2 1.05 1.00 1.10 1 .93 1.16 1.10 2 .90 ■ .80 1.00 1 1.17 1.14 1.17 1.27 2 1.07 1.27 1.23 1.12 APPENDIX F 107 HEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Y-l-B Age Article Months Michigan Apples iy 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy> New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3^ New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 — Pounds per Base Box — \ Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .98 1.00 1.0S 2 1.00 1.06 1.00 11 .86 .82 1.12 .95 12 .90 .80 1.07 .75 23 .85 .77 1.06 1.33 24 .89 1.02 .90 1.09 42 1.01 .95 1.14 1.15 43 .80 .86 .93 1.18 1 .99 .83 1.20 .94 2 .93 .93 1.13 .90 1 1.19 . . . 1.19 1.17 2 1.40 1.09 .95 24 .88 ... 1.06 25 .92 ... 1.05 26 1.05 ... .98 27 1.02 .90 28 .86 .98 1 1.01 l.ii 1.15 1.03 2 .95 1.08 1.22 1.22 3 1.18 1.07 1.06 1.28 4 1.02 1.07 1.42 1.37 5 .92 .97 1.04 1.23 37 .93 .85 1.23 1.15 41 1.12 .99 1.08 1.07 42 .81 .78 1.03 1.14 43 .97 .82 1.32 1.16 44 1.04 .95 1.22 1.13 18 .96 1.40 1.10 19 1.05 .93 1.30 22 .88 ... 1.12 1.22 23 .92 1.19 1.17 24 .85 . . . 1.13 1.20 1 .97 .95 .87 1.06 2 .98 ' 1.00 1.16 1.03 1 1.12 . . . 1.26 .79 2 1.05 1.12 1.12 1 .99 1.02 1.16 .99 2 .99 1.01 1.22 1.15 3 1.02 1.13 1.07 .95 4 1.08 1.19 1.19 1.52 5 1.01 1.04 1.11 .95 6 .84 .92 Lost 1.10 21 .80 1.12 1.12 22 .87 . . . 1.04 .91 1 .85 .95 1.04 1.03 2 1.15 1.07 1.07 1.20 15 .93 1.00 1.04 16 .83 1.22 1.13 1 1.03 1.20 1.46 2 .95 1.25 1.10 1 .74 . . . 1.05 1.03 2 .70 .93 .95 1 .95 1.00 1.01 2 .85 . . . 1.10 1.18 1 .93 .98 1.04 1.07 2 1.48 1.40 1.16 1.07 108 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915— Continued Y-4-B Article Months Michigan Apples V/2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/2 Clam Juice 2J4 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2/ 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin 1^ Michigan Pumpkin V/z New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3^2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 2>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. 1 Body No. 1 .90 Body No. 2 Top .96 Bottom 1.10 2 .99 1.04 .96 13 .82 .85 1.00 .92 14 .84 .81 1.02 .81 23 .95 .99 .99 .98 24 1.04 1.00 1.09 1.07 23 1.22 1.15 .87 .83 24 .88 1.01 .85 .89 1 1.16 1.02 .99 1.05 2 .89 .83 1.02 .90 1 1.06 1.00 1.10 2 .95 • • • 1.18 1.06 23 1.00 . . . 1.02 25 .88 . ■ ■ ... 1.12 26 1.03 > • • ... 1.10 27 1.10 . . . 1.10 28 .90 .85 1 1.01 1.11 1.15 1.13 2 .95 1.08 1.22 1.22 3 1.18 1.07 1.06 1.28 4 1.02 1.07 1.42 1.37 5 .92 .97 1.04 1.23 37 .94 .97 .96 .95 38 .88 .80 .99 .95 39 .89 .89 1.05 1.04 41 .87 .95 .95 .90 42 .89 .90 1.05 .96 18 .98 1.00 1.08 19 .97 .94 1.22 22 .94 1.00 1.09 23 .75 1.00 1.12 24 .96 1.07 1.15 1 1.04 1.15 1.14 1.14 2 .98 .98 1.11 1.08 1 .87 1.18 1.03 2 .85 1.05 .98 1 1.00 1.00 .99 .92 2 .90 .98 1.00 .98 3 .94 .96 .92 1.06 4 .98 1.05 1.07 1.00 5 .97 1.09 .90 1.06 6 .77 .82 1.12 1.08 21 .75 ... 1.00 .87 24 .95 • . • .80 .87 1 1.01 .99 .92 .96 2 .99 1.01 1.02 1.04 13 .88 1.02 1.15 14 .87 .93 1.02 1 1.05 ... 1.00 1.00 2 1.04 1.15 1.22 1 .97 .82 1.05 2 .85 .94 1.06 1 .85 1.03 1.06 2 .96 .93 .97 1 .89 .96 1.09 1.13 2 1.02 .90 1.01 .95 APPENDIX F 109 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Z-l-B Age Article Months Michigan Apples. . „ 1^4 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2J^ Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin l 1 /^, Michigan Pumpkin 1^ New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3J^ New Jersey. Tomatoes ... 3*/2 Tuna Fish 3 . — Pounds per Base Box — \ Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .83 .99 1.04 2 .90 .93 1.10 19 .99 .80 1.08 .98 22 1.01 .80 .94 .83 21 .83 1.01 1.23 .97 22 .90 .82 1.14 1.17 46 .98 1.03 1.07 1.09 47 .98 .91 .94 1.03 1 1.13 1.11 1.12 .69 2 .92 .87 1.26 .99 1 1.21 1.10 1.07 2 1.10 ... 1.00 1.18 24 1.10 1.22 25 1.02 1.10 26 1.06 ... 1.14 27 .93 1.06 28 .87 1.29 1 1.21 1.14 1.14 1.23 2 1.16 1.21 1.24 1.15 3 1.08 1.19 1.12 1.14 4 .88 .95 1.07 1.01 5 1.08 1.17 1.12 1.03 41 .95 1.05 1.05 1.20 42 1.15 1.09 1.23 1.35 43 1.13 .91 .85 .89 44 1.03 1.03 1.03 Lost 45 .93 .98 1.12 1.17 19 .78 1.03 1.18 20 1.15 1.14 1.00 22 1.04 1.12 1.08 23 1.43 1.10 1.23 24 1.05 1.43 1.16 1 1.09 1.06 .91 1.13 2 1.07 1.12 .98 1.18 1 1.03 1.22 .95 2 1.00 .98 1.12 1 1.11 1.08 1.01 1.10 2 1.15 1.14 1.12 1.06 3 1.13 1.22 1.07 1.17 4 1.36 1.30 1.03 1.12 5 1.08 1.07 1.05 1.11 6 .97 .97 1.23 .95 14 .83 .81 .76 24 .76 ... 1.04 1.03 1 1.10 1.03 1.20 1.22 2 .80 .88 , 1.26 1.04 22 1.02 1.23 .94 23 .96 1.10 1.12 1 1.00 1.14 .97 2 .96 1.08 1.17 1 1.04 • ■«• .94 .95 2 1.16 .95 1.12 1 1.05 . . . .98 .90 2 1.20 1.17 1.00 1 .96 .92 1.11 1.09 2 .82 .97 .90 .93 110 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued W-l-C Article Months Michigan Apples .... V/ 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider l l / 2 Clam Juice 2^2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2y Maine Corn (Side) 2y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin 1J/2 Michigan Pumpkin \y> New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes. v . . 3*/2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3^2 Tuna Fish 3 f Pounds per Base Box — N Can No. Body No. 1 Body IS lo. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.11 1.20 .80 2 1.23 1.00 1.10 1 .97 .93 1.08 .94 3 .92 1.05 .93 1.01 21 1.34 1.15 1.11 1.11 22 1.08 1.17 1.20 .98 45 1.12 1.18 1.27 1.14 46 1.09 1.16 1.09 1.26 1 .96 l.oe 1.15 .97 2 .91 .94 1.10 1.12 1 1.22 1.27 1.00 2 1.08 • • ■ 1.28 ■ 1.32 2l 1.10 1.20 22 1.30 1.10 23 1.09 1.45 25 1.20 ... 1.12 26 .86 1.09 1 1.34 .1.38 1.24 1.15 2 1.37 1.32 1.17 .97 3 .88 1.01 1.19 1.11 4 1.44 1.3c ! 1.18 1.17 5 1.01 .97 1.15 1.14 40 1.40 1.34 1.16 1.00 41 1.29 1.38 1.26 1.11 42 1.04 1.11 1.16 1.12 43 1.23 1.18 1.58 1.14 44 1.23 1.12 1.26 1.38 10 1.21 1.40 1.38 11 1.26 1.35 1.37 12 1.26 . . 1.08 1.13 22 .97 1.42 1.40 23 1.35 . . 1.12 1.20 1 1.03 l.i: L 1.26 1.20 2 ' 1.23 1.0; 5 1.25 1.18 1 1.10, . . 1.06 1.19 2 1.12 1.18 1.15 1 1.04 1.1, 5 1.08 1.15 2 1.15 1.3, 5 1.14 1.22 3 1.22 1.2; I 1.05 1.24 4 1.28 1.21 ) 1.17 1.24 5 1.34 1.2( ) 1.16. 1.11 6 1.21 1.2; ? 1.05 1.33 23 .88 . . 1.31 1.06 24 .88 1.12 1.30 1 1.24 1.21 3 1.12 1.29 2 1.34 1.1 ) 1.22 1.38 19 1.10 1.15 1.56 22 .94 . . 1.20 1.07 1 1.01 1.15 1.42 2 1.33 1.30 1.25 1 .93 1.15 1.05 2 1.00 1.20 1.30 1 1.30 1.09 1.25 2 1.20 1.35 1.22 39 1.20 1.1- i 1.12 1.27 47 Lost 1.2 5 1.15 1.09 APPENDIX F 111 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued W-2-C Article Months Michigan Apples iy 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice %y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2 J / 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes d T /> New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3^4 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.09 1.16 1.03 2 1.04 1.22 1.19 21 .96 .94 1.15 1.11 24 1.06 1.02 1.09 1.05 23 1.18 1.20 1.34 1.34 24 1.12 1.10 1.18 1.30 45 .99 1.04 1.18 1.11 46 .99 1.22 1.16 1.21 1 1.05 1.02 1.24 1.14 2 .97 .96 1.21 1.17 1 1.15 1.32 1.30 2 1.19 1.50 1.46 22 1.14 1.00 25 1.32 1.28 26 1.37 • • - 1.20 27 1.19 ... 1.24 28 1.32 1.21 1 1.20 1.08 1.23 1.15 2 1.10 1.05 1.23 1.11 3 1.26 1.21 1.38 1.23 4 1.11 1.03 1.09 1.11 5 1.12 1.16 1.07 1.10 40 1.06 1.02 1.27 1.53 41 1.07 1.08 1.25 1.08 42 1.03 1.06 1.06 1.33 43 1.27 1.16 1.22 1.13 44 1.08 1.09 1.24 1.06 17 1.10 1.15 1.42 18 1.03 1.28 1.46 21 1.00 1.10 1.42 22 1.12 1.28 1.15 23 1.10 1.03 1.28 1 1.39 . 1.40 1.26 1.23 2 1.23 1.23 1.15 1.15 1 1.10 1.31 1.19 2 1.08 1.21 1.36 1 1.21 1.10 1.21 1.21 2 1.12 1.06 1.24 1.09 3 1.20 1.19 1.33 1.32 4 1.09 1.03 1.14 1.10 5 1.09 1.14 1.28 1.00 6 1.07 1.00 1.07 1.02 21 1.10 1.19 1.20 22 .94 1.14 1.20 1 .98 .99 1.05 1.10 2 1.04 1.05 * 1,35 1.11 18 .77 1.31 1.35 21 1.00 1.10 1.20 1 .93 .96 1.28 2 1.10 .1.05 1.20 1 .95 1.10 1.26 2 1.09 1.05 1.35 1 1.08. 1.20 1.12 2 1.00 1.14 1.29 1 .71 .84 1.21 1.25 . 2 1.35 1.25 1.14 1.04 112 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-l-C Age Article Months Michigan Apples. V/2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider iy 2 Clam Juice 2^ Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2>4 Maine Corn (Side) %y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3y New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3y Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.14 1.30 1.18 2 .89 1.15 1.09 13 .93 1.10 1.14 1.00 14 1.19 1.35 .95 1.06 22 1.22 1.30 1.30 1.18 23 1.05 1.00 1.11 1.01 45 .97 1.00 1.49 1.09 46 1.24 1.05 1.24 1.28 1 1.09 1.10 1.27 1.14 2 .91 .88 1.05 1.22 1 1.20 ... 1.45 1.30 2 1.15 1.39 1.47 13 1.12 . . . 1.16 21 1.18 1.09 22 . 1.05 ... . • • 1.40 23 1.03 ... • . . 1.16 25 1.27 1.12 1 1.21 1.29 . 1.13 1.20 2 1.36 1.20 1.21 1.20 3 1.00 1.00 1.36 1.16 4 1.03 1.03 1.28 1.40 5 1.02 1.16 1.18 1.40 41 1.25 1.17 1.20 1.41 42 1.25 1.13 .95 1.17 43 1.07 1.23 1.17 1.13 44 1.06 1.26 1.25 1.20 45 1.18 1.32 1.16 1.40 18 1.17 . . . 1.20 1.25 19 1.10 1.20 1.18 21 1.19 • • • 1.40 1.23 22 .94 • • • 1.50 1.20 23 1.22 . . . 1.36 1.25 1 1.27 1.22 1.30 1.26 2 1.13 1.14 1.18 Lost 1 1.09 ... 1.08 1.43 2 Lost 1.28 1.12 1 .98 1.17 1.17 1.09 2 1.39 1.46 1.16 1.23 3 1.31 1.19 1.33 1.47 4 1,19 1.17 1.17 1.20 5 1.25 1.12 1.30 1.15 6 1.37 1.25 1.34 1.11 15 .98 . . . .95 1.12 16 1.37 1.24 1.08 1 1.04 .94 1.18 1.23 2 1.13 1.05 1.31 1.13 21 1.10 . . . .98 1.12 22 .90 . . . 1.51 1.18 1 1.14 1.15 1.42 2 1.10 . . . 1.26 1.44 1 .95 1.09 1.23 2 1.03 1.22 1.15 1 .98 . . . 1.25 1.19 2 1.15 1.18 1.21 1 1.31 1.33 1.19 1.01 2 1.35 1.33 1.29 1.15 APPENDIX F 113 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-3-C Age Article Months Michigan Apples 1]4> New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider 1J4 Clam Juice %y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2*/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2 J / 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin l J / 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?> l / 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... %y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .86 1.09 1.32 2 .99 1.47 1.47 9 .72 .71 1.07 1.05 10 .81 .84 .96 1.39 23 .84 1.06 1.19 1.32 24 .90 1.00 1.28 1.19 21 1.14 1.10 1.12 1.09 24 .92 .91 1.16 1.31 1 1.27 1.34 1.22 1.10 2 1.26 1.14 1.17 1.11 1 1.18 1.23 1.27 2 1.03 1.21 1.56 22 1.03 1.28 25 1.00 ... ... 1.15 26 1.00 ... 1.00 27 .90 1.06 28 .95 1.50 1 .95 '.88 1.47 1.08 2 1.34 1.34 . 1.39 1.33 3 1.14 1.08 1.37 1.44 4 1.08 1.01 1.27 1.38 5 1.57 1.51 1.41 1.28 38 .95 .98 1.23 1.30 41 .81 .87 1.49 1.41 42 1.11 1.03 1.30 1.35 43 .93 .93 1.44 1.35 45 .99 .87 1.39 1.27 17 1.07 1.30 1.37 18 1.09 1.16 1.27 21 1.07 1.20 1.36 22 1.33 1.33 1.55 23 1.19 1.20 1.22 1 1.56 1.58 1.40 1.27 2 1.27 1.35 1.14 1.32 1 1.18 1.62 1.12 2 .93 1.00 1.18 1 1.17 1.16 1.19 1.46 2 1.18 1.11 1.22 1.37 3 1.28 1.29 1.48 1.14 4 1.12 1.14 1.20 1.38 5 1.36 1.29 1.39 1.33 6 1.38 1.26 1.54 1.38 23 .72 1.10 1.41 24 1.10 1.34 1.23 1 1.34 1.43 1.13 1.11 2 1.22 1.24 'l.07 1.42 16 .84 1.14 1.35 18 1.14 1.12 1.39 1 1.10 1.23 1.25 2 1.23 1.35 1.50 1 1.12 1.21 1.40 2 .95 1.08 1.04 1 1.06 1.09 1.07 2 .94 1.12 1.27 1 1.40 1.48 1.14 1.32 . 2 1.29 1.25 1.04 1.02 114 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Y-l-C Age Article Months Michigan Apples \y 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2,y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) 2J^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin l]/ 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 2>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .97 1.03 1.15 2 1.25 1.09 1.18 23 1.05 .89 1.06 .99 24 .90 .95 1.11 1.05 21 .91 .88 1.18 1.13 22' 1.06 1.08 1.02 1.02 22 .97 .93 1.18 1.08 23 1.06 1.17 1.05 1.04 1 1.16 1.15 1.21 1.10 2 1.10 1.14 1.06 .98 1 1.05 1.32 1.32 2 1.08 • • • 1.16 1.41 13 1.19 . . . 1.00 25 .97 . . . 1.23 26 1.17 1.15 27 1.14 . • • . . • 1.30 28 1.10 1.03 1 1.29 1.33 1.18 1.38 2 1.07 1.13 1.10 .93 3 1.25 1.21 1.25 1.26 4 1.25 1.28 1.25 1J3 5 1.17 1.07 1.14 .92 41 1.23 1.31 1.04 1.06 ' 42 1.02 .90 1.27 1.17 43 1.12 1.07 1.23 1.26 44 1.17 1.19 .89 1.16 45 1.02 1.03 1.13 1.13 18 .89 .89 1.20 19 1.20 1.23 98 20 1.10 1.20 1.08 22 1.15 1.30 1.19 24 1.12 1.37 1.28 1 1.30 1.21 1.24 1.30 2 Lost 1.05 1.35 1.29 1 1.03 1.23 1.23 2 1.15 1.15 1.20 1 1.09 1.07 1.24 .98 2 1.59 1.65 1.22 1.17 3 1.14 1.15 1.23 .88 4 1.25 1.17 1.21 1.33 5 1.25 1.26 1.36 1.02 6 1.26 1.24 1.09 .89 22 1.06 1.05 .93 23 1.05 . . . 1.28 1.28 1 1.00 1.20 .1.20 1.03 2 1.15 1.09 .95 1.07 13 1.10 1.26 .98 16 1.37 1.05 1.17 1 1.25 1.18 1.21 2 1.17 . . . 1.25 1.10 1 1.03 .98 .95 2 1.00 .98 1.10 1 .90 Lost .89 2 .83 .88 1.31 1 1.12 1.12 1.30 1.22 2 1.43 1.25 Lost 1.22 APPENDIX F 115 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Y-4-C Age Article Months Michigan Apples l l / 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider , iy 2 Clam Juice 2 J / 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2 J / 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... %y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top \ Bottom 1 .97 1.20 1.19 2 1.08 1.22 1.31 13 1.23 1.26 1.14 1.12 14 1.02 .99 1.18 1.18 1 1.13 1.31 1.15 1.06 2 1.31 1.28 1.18 1.15 41 1.30 1.19 1.01 1.05 43 1.24 1.14 1.10 1.15 1 1.13 1.19 1.12 1.14 2 1.05 1.03 1.32 .99 1 1.22 1.20 1.32 2 1.14 1.32 1.22 2 1.18 1.30 22 1.43 1.32 24 1.19 1.15 25 1.30 1.48 26 1.19 1.18 1 1.16 1.21 1.33 1.16 2 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.31 3 1.51 1.44 1.22 1.13 4 1.17 1.18 1.16 1.16 5 .92 .91 1.29 1.17 41 1.02 .98 1.02 1.11 42 1.05 1.09 1.15 1.33 43 1.06 1.13 1.15 1.51 44 1.26 1.35 1.27 1.16 45 1.18 1.23 1.26 1.11 19 1.22 1.21 1.10 20 1.37 1.12 1.30 22 1.12 1.28 1.12 23 1.17 1.40 1.18 24 1.04 1.27 1.23 1 1.32 1.22 1.24 1.26 2 1.12 1.09 1.18 1.22 1 1.28 1.35 1.31 2 1.00 1.30 1.34 1 1.24 1.22 1.06 1.22 2 1.12 1.07 1.11 1.17 3 1.07 1.21 1.07 1.17 4 1.10 1.07 1.28 1.05 5 1.31 1.34 1.16 1.17 6 1.28 1.35 1.20 1.29 22 1.12 1.07 1.00 23 1.03 1.06 1.21 1 .93 .95 J-07 1.20 2 .98 .96 1.13 1.07 23 1.15 1.40 1.19 24 .97 1.23 1.13 1 1.15 .90 1.05 2 1.20 1.05 .97 1 1.02 1.26 1.16 2 1.26 1.09 1.14 1 1.09 1.25 1.00 2 .98 1 1.12 1.19 1.23 1.15 2 1.55 1.38 1.07 1.33 116 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Z-l-C Age Article Months Michigan Apples. ....... \y 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider \y 2 Clam Juice %y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2 J / 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 Michigan Pumpkin ±y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y> Tuna Fish 3 )an No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top \ Bottom 1 1.05 1.10 1.10 ' 2 1.25 1.10 1.21 19 1.14 1.17 1.11 1.14 22 1.13 1.06 1.27 1.24 1 .86 1.18 1.26 1.24 2 1.11 1.05 1.11 1.16 45 1.12 1.07 1.17 1.30 46 1.03 1.08 1.91 1.20 1 1.37 1.33 1.26 1.15 2 1.18 1.09 1.16 1.21 1 1.15 1.21 1.19 2 1.20 1.13 1.21 23 1.09 Tost 25 1.42 1.18 26 1.02 Lost 27 1.40 1.40 28 1.35 1.34 1 1.47 1.36 1.34 1.23 2 1.33 1.19 1.37 1.36 3 .99 .95 1.24 , 139 4 1.34 1.43 1.20 1.19 5 1.22 1.24 1.29 1.23 41 1.31 1.22 .96 1.30 42 1.30 1.27 1.23 1.27 43 1.27 1.20 1.27 1.31 44 .96 .86 1.24 1.36 45 .88 .82 1.23 1.22 20 1.03 1.36 1.47 21 1.27 1.30 1.22 22 1.26 1.37' 1.20 23 1.03 1.33 1.39 24 1.38 1.15 1.27 1 1.21 1.25 1.26 1.27 2 1.27 1.31 1.21 1.21 1 1.43 1.32 1.19 2 1.33 1.33 1.20 1 1.37 1.31 1.10 1.10 2 1.19 1.24 2.47 1.33 3 1.07 - 1.12 1.53 1.24 4 1.40 1.22 1.34 1.20 5 1.20 1.22 1.25 1.17 6 1.10 1.12 1.25 1.29 22 .98 1.15 1.16 23 1.03 1.30 1.33 1 1.06 1.07 1.16 1.13 2 1.29 1.19 1.41 1.16 23 1.26 1.41 1.25 24 1.17 1.36 1.25 1 .97 1.22 1.12 2 .86 1.14 1.30 1 1.13 . . . 1.15 1.06 2 1.21 1.18 1.21 1 1.20 1.05 1.22 2 1.25 1.15 1.20 1 1.21 1.13 .1.23 1.23 2 1.39 1.29 1.28 1.33 APPENDIX F 117 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued W-l-D Age Article Months Michigan Apples • iy 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider ' V/ 2 Clam Juice 2y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2 1 /, Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas . 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3^ New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y> Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. — Pounds per 1 Body No. 2 Base Box — Top Bottom 1 1.42 1.48 1.37 2 1.21 1.31 1.58 14 1.35 1.30 1.24 1.16 15 1.21 1.18 1.36 1.43 11 1.17 1.17 1.35 1.36 12 1.35 1.39 1.43 1.34 47 1.44 1.42 1.31 1.41 48 1.32 1.24 1.52 1.32 1 1.37 1.39 1.26 1.36 2 1.37 1.36 1.17 1.45 1 1.35 1.42 1.36 2 1.46 1.33 1.37 21 1.35 1.50 25 1.32 1.45 26 1.22 • • • 1.68 27 1.29 • • ■ 1.55 28 1.23 ... 1.55 1 1.55 1.57 1.37 1.22 2 1.31 1.40 1.34 1.26 3 1.32 1.30 1.40 1.33 4 1.56 1.51 1.31 1.50 5 1.12 1.13 1.49 1.36 17 1.35 1.31 1.58 1.40 18 1.17 1.17 1.50 1.58 19 1.29 1.27 1.24 1.42 20 1.39 1.42 1.42 1.35 21 1.25 1.24 1.53 1.59 41 1.27 1.32 1.37 42 1.40 1.42 1.51 43 1.30 1.46 1.27 44 1.20 1.47 1.51 45 1.34 1.58 1.43 1 1.39 1.44 1.30 1.50 2 1.49 1.40 1.51 2.03 1 1.23 1.62 1.43 2 1.26 1.50 1.33 1 1.41 1.41 1.60 1.57 2 1.48 1.58 1.24 1.31 3 1.61 1.54 1.45 1.19 4 1.42 1.53 1.53 1.33 5 1.25 1.31 1.47 1.18 6 1.45 1.40 1.34 1.50 23 1.28 1.30 1.25 24 1.09 1.57 1.33 1 1.44 1.36 1.40 1.44 2 1.35 1.32 'l.64 1.38 19 1.15 1.36 1.47 22 1.05 1.53 1.41 1 1.18 * 1.32 1.36 2 1.15 • « • 1.37 1.45 1 1.65 1.26 1.44 2 1.17 1.30 1.33 1 1.32 1.37 1.27 2 1.36 1.40 1.33 40 1.35 1.45 1.41 1.41 43 1.54 Lost 1.25 1.24 118 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued W-2-D Age Article Months Michigan Apples l T / 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2^2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes '3 Maryland Tomatoes 2>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes . . . 2>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top \ Bottom 1 1.17 1.25 1.19 2 1.41 1.20 1.34 15 1.16 1.24 1.30 1.17 18 1.03 1.06 1.22 1.59 13 1.77 1.67 1.56 1.47 15 1.29 1.36 1.24 1.39 47 1.23 1.32 1.53 1.37 48 1.31 1.42 1.36 1.16 1 1.24 1.15 1.57 1.46 2 1.37 1.36 1.19 1.57 1 1.57 1.31 1.40 2 1.59 1.37 1.56 21 1.21 ... 1.60 25 1.48 . . . 1.29 26 1.33 . . . 1.33 27 1.28 1.80 28 1.70 . . . 1.62 1 1.11 1.01 1.65 1.73 2 1.15 1.02 1.25 1.15 3 1.24 1.16 1.31 1.35 4 1.30 1.33 1.74 1.44 5 1.17 1.30 1.33 1.59 41 1.24 1.24 1.22 1.57 42 1.43 1.35 1.74 1.57 43 1.57 1.61 1.35 1.24 44 1.31 1.36 1.53 1.36 45 1.22 1.11 1.12 1.47 19 1.46 1.83 1.43 21 1.33 1.43 1.69 22 1.22 1.53 1.10 23 1.22 1.73 1.53 24 1.46 1.65 1.37 1 1.47 1.42 1.61 1.61 2 1.34 1.12 1.23 1.44 1 1.33 1.58 1.31 2 1.50 1.47 1.33 1 .98 1.00 1.23 1.22 2 1.06 1.12 1.35 1.59 3 1.15 1.30 1.34 1.48 4 1.59 1.45 1.54 1.25 5 1.36 1.40 1.36 1.36 6 1.48 1.60 1.75 1.31 21 1.41 1.37 1.14 22 1.30 1.12 1.65 1 1.40 1.38 1.55 1.49 2 1.40 1.25 1.48 1.26 21 1.12 1.36 1.56 24 1.29 . . . 1.25 1.26 1 1.18 1.27 1.40 2 1.25 1.35 1.44 1 1.56 1.36 1.27 2 1.60 1.20 1.19 1 1.50 1.62 1.35 2 1.25 1.25 1.67 1 1.33 1.29 1.48 1.48 2 1.36 1.33 1.34 1.22 APPENDIX F 119 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-l-D Age Article Months Michigan Apples lj^ New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice %y 2 Illinois Corn ' 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin 1^4 Michigan Pumpkin 1^ New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3^2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3^> Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.28 1.49 1.30 2 1.15 1.42 1.44 5 1.09 1.06 1.36 1.55 8 1.41 1.14 1.11 1.26 21 1.35 1.33 1.60 1.59 22 1.37 1.28 1.49 1.69 15 1.15 1.10 1.30 1.42 23 1.44 1.41 1.34 1.51 1 1.17 1.15 1.34 1.44 2 1.39 1.34 1.40 1.31 1 1.43 1.56 1.60 2 1.25 1.63 1.58 21 1.19 1.40 23 1.31 1.45 25 1.30 1.4J 27 1.34 1.29 28 1.10 1.51 1 1.08 1.15 1.46 1.36 2 1.37 1.39 1.37 1.46 3 1.09 1.16 1.28 1.38 4 1.38 1.27 1.52 1.71 5 1.37 1.24 1.46 1.31 39 1.51 1.74 1.53 1.43 40 1.22 1.41 1.24 1.55 42 1.35 1.26 1.25 1.52 43 1.55 1.32 1.25 1.32 44 1.30 1.39 1.50 1.32 19 1.10 1.30 1.50 18 1.40 1.60 1.47 21 1.42 1.53 1.35 22 1.41 1.53 1.39 23 1.40 1.43 1.30 1 1.32 1.32 1.43 1.38 2 1.29 1.30 1.48 1.26 1 1.34 1.37 1.45 2 1.29 1.36 1.45 1 1.25 1.25 1.39 1.48 2 1.19 1.23 1.68 1.53 3 .67 1.20 1.42 1.52 4 1.62 1.48 1.40 1.45 5 1.22 1.30 1.42 1.24 6 1.22 1.20 1.56 1.39 22 1.05 1.48 1.34 23 .97 1.17 1.26 1 1.41 1.34 1.37 1.60 2 1.24 1.16 1.55 1.49 15 1.15 1.30 1.33 16 1.09 1.31 1.28 1 1.16 1.47 1.27 2 1.12 1.53 1.58 1 1.19 . . . 1.40 1.10 2 1.22 1.45 1.56 1 1.20 1.31 1.36 2 1.25 1.21 1.58 1 1.41 1.52 1.52 1.49 2 1.32 1.38 1.56 1.41 120 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-3-D Age Article Months Michigan Apples l l / 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice iy 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) %y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin . . iy> Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes zy 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3^2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 .89 1.34 1.56 2 1.31 1.33 1.27 9 1.02 1.05 1.47 1.57 10 1.34 1.39 1.34 1.39 21 .80 .89 1.45 1.63 24 1.18 1.14 1.25 1.33 41 1.18 1.19 1.47 1.47 42 1.72 1.56 1.27 1.54 1 1.47 1.26 .97 1.76 2 1.08 1.18 1.68 1.66 1 1.16 1.35 1.61 2 1.17 1.54 1.3S 19 1.48 1.51 22 1.28 1.26 23 1.10 1.37 25 .97 1.78 28 1.65 1.4b 1 1.36 1.39 1.52 1.54 2 1.14 .89 1.28 1.27 3 1.29 1.28 1.26 1.56 4 1.23 1.15 1.52 1.58 5 1.58 1.54 1.60 1.40 35 1.55 1.70 1.70 1.49 36 1.49 1.48 1.35 1.87 38 1.36 1.51 1.50 1.84 39 1.26 1.35 1.49 1.51 40 1.39 1.21 1.27 1.41 20 1.14 1.64 1.40 21 1.55 . . . 1.43 1.47 22 1.19 . . . 1.25 1.46 23 1.27 1.60 1.80 24 1.19 . . . 1.59 1.57 1 1.35 1.56 1.36 1.67 2 1.26 1.15 1.48 1.43 1 1.63 1.19 1.33 2 1.67 1.35 1.16 1 1.34 1.39 1.79 1.24 2 1.39 1.48 1.56 1.83 3 1:48 1.47 1.40 1.67 4 .1.20 1.29 1.41 1.53 5 1.70 1.81 1.34 1.98 6 1.61 1.58 1.31 1.53 23 • 1.40 1.32 1.23 24 1.21 1.15 1.33 1 1.17 1.18 1.55 1.99 2 1.45. 1.40 1.06 1.39 19 1.08 1.20 1.54 22 1.55 1.35 1.60 1 1.33 1.40 1.26 2 1.10 1.65 1.56 1 1.27 1.18 1.25 2 .96 1.32 1.24 1 1.23 1.19 1.31 2 1.39 1.42 1.34 1 1.18 1.07 1.36 1.93 2 .96 .96 1.47 1.36 APPENDIX F 121 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Y-l-D Age Article Months Michigan Apples Ij4 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) 2y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.40 1.64 1.33 2 1.52 1.45 1.49 23 1.14 1.42 1.35 1.1.1 24 1.03 1.12 1.16 1.26 21 1.47 1.43 1.40 1.40 22 1.09 1.00 1.56 1.26 45 1.60 1.52 1.39 1.24 46 1.04 1.17 1.12 1.60 1 1.30 1.19 1.46 1.37 2 1.53 1.58 1.43 1.58 1 1.39 • • • 1.55 1.31 2 1.26 1.46 1.53 14 1.17 1.52 25 1.14 . . . • ■ • 1.15 26 1.35 • • • ■ • • 1.60 27 1.53 1.27 28 1.56 1.55 1 1.50 1.52 1.55 1.37 2 1.62 1.60 1.34 1.48 3 1.14 1.13 1.53 1.30 4 1.16 " 1.24 1.34 1.24 5 1.41 1.43 1.13 1.24 41 1.52 1.56 1.49 1.40 42 1.30 1.30 1.44 1.39 43 1.80 1.69 1.48 1.38 44 1.60 1.60 1.52 1.40 45 1.32 1.44 1.23 1.17 17 1.35 1.50 1.65 21 1.47 1.58 1.26 22 1.65 1.41 1.51 23 1.32 . . . 1.62 1.46 24 1.48 1.45 1.56 1 1.34 1.35 1.34 1.65 2 1.32 1.35 1.79 1.76 1 1.71 1.38 1.48 2 1.43 1.40 1.38 1 1.40 1.39 1.24 1.44 2 1.25 1.22 1.40 1.41 3 1.68 1.69 1.52 1.47 4 1.20 1.18 1.62 1.58 5 1.47 1.49 1.48 1.66 6 1.47 1.28 1.62 1.28 21 1.13 1.27 1.28 23 1.37 1.61 1.51 1 1.72 1.54 1.23 1.57 2 1.45 1.60 1.17 1.78 14 1.15 ... 1.16 1.43 15 1.30 ... 1.43 1.37 1 1.30 1.30 1.60 2 ■ 1.35 1.40 1.35 1 1.15 1.23 1.38 2 1.30 1.48 1.50 1 1.43 1.40 1.43 2 1.48 . . . 1.64 1.35 1 1.53 1.60 1.54 1.44 2 1.54 1.53 .1.29 1.29 122 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915— Continued Y-4-D Age Article Months Michigan Apples 1^2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2J^ Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. 1 2 20 24 1 2 41 42 1 2 1 2 22 23 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 41 42 43 44 45 19 21 22 23 24 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 22 23 1 2 1 Missing 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Body No. 1.32 1.18 1.32 1.35 1.23 1.29 1.23 1.21 1.23 1.26 1.35 1.50 1.24 1.33 1.32 1.33 1.34 1.27 1.41 1.21 1.24 1.22 1.32 1.31 ,1.24 1.47 1.23 1.33 1.41 1.38 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.35 1.39 1.28 1.33 1.53 1.16 1.21 1.23 1.43 1.46 1.60 1.41 1.21 1.22 1.20 1.45 1.20 1.05 1.32 1.47 2.26 Pounds per Base Box 1 Body No. 2 1.32 1.39 1.25 1.28 1.18 1.35 1.30 1.23 1.31 1.43 1.11 1.17 1.27 1.31 1.29 1.32 1.56 1.26 1.55 1.22 1.24 1.77 1.31 1.08 1.13 1.40 1.29 1.30 Top 1.40 1.35 1.27 1.46 1.35 1.33 1.10 1.38 1.26 1.37 1.42 1.64 1.55 2.45 1.28 1.28 1.20 1.44 1.29 1.48 1.47 1.35 1.35 1.78 1.46 1.52 1.30 1.50 1.36 1.26 1.26 1.40 1.43 1.42 1.29 1.41 1.51 1.41 1.29 1.19 1.41 1.25 1.60 1.35 1.30 1.50 1.35 1.52 1.64 1.35 1.45 Bottom 1.30 1.25 1.06 1.13 1.54 1.26 1.20 1.67 1.39 1.15 1.31 1.31 1.17 1.49 1.43 1.20 1.63 1.49 1.45 1.28 1.56 1.48 1.35 1.35 1.34 1.56 1.30 1.59 1.40 1.13 1.20 1.23 1.36 1.50 1.32 1.57 1.35 1.28 1.35 1.28 1.46 1.33 1.22 1.31 1.53 1.36 1.30 1.46 1.10 1.30 123 1.39 1.68 1.37 APPENDIX F 123 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Z-l-D Age Article Months Michigan Apples iy 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice %y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... %y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. 1 Body No. 1 1.28 Body No. 2 Top 1.32 Bottom 1.43 2 1.40 . • • 1.21 1.55 19 1.43 1.45 1.64 1.27 22 1.31 1.36 1.32 1.53 1 1.42 1.36 1.36 1.51 2 1.17 1.27 1.40 1.49 32 1.43 1.50 1.57 1.64 35 1.23 1.19 1.53 1.62 1 1.39 1.45 1.51 1.36 2 1.45 1.41 1.69 1.57 1 1.15 1.21 1.19 2 1.20 1.13 1.21 23 1.46 1.45 25 1.44 1.41 26 1.34 1.38 27 1.49 1.40 28 1.57 1.45 1 1.38 1.31 1.42 1.53 2 1.34 1.35 1.61 1.54 3 1.46 1.48 1.59 1.45 4 1.74 1.78 1.41 1.45 5 1.65 1.61 1.55 1.52 38 1.44 1.36 1.51 1.77 41 1.78 1.67 1.58 1.57 42 1.49 1.46 1.71 1.44 43 1.43 1.43 1.66 1.65 44 1.91 1.83 1.69 1.44 19 1.41 1.68 1.41 20 1.41 1.54 1.53 22 1.60 1.56 1.50 23 1.50 . . . 1.43 1.66 24 1.33 1.55 1.78 1 1.38 1.41 1.50 1.49 2 1.69 1.69 1.32 1.43 1 1.56 . . . ■1.48 1.54 2 1.54 1.44 1.49 1 1.46 1.39 1.23 1.50 2 1.49 1.43 1.58 1.37 3 1.56 1.51 1.52 1.53 4 1.60 1.52 1.46 1.58 5 1.36 1.29 1.39 1.53 6 1.72 1.67 1.54 1.37 22 1.37 1.46 1.15 24 1.41 1.54 1.36 1 1.33 1.37 1.38 1.59 2 1.47 1.55 1.64 1.39 23 1.58 1.37 1.48 24 1.37 1.46 1.44 1 1.40 1.36 1.75 2 1.26 1.40 1.67 1 1.38 1.43 1.53 2 1.42 1.43 1.58 1 1.62 1.65 1.55 2 1.48 1.50 1.35 1 1.32 1.46 1.42 1.46 2 1.62 1.64 1.27 1.42 124 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued W-l-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples \y 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider \y 2 Clam Juice 2^ Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2*/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2>4 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin. ....... l J / 2 Michigan Pumpkin l J / 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3^4 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3 J / 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Bodv No. 1 ruunutt per jd Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.59 1.59 1.74 2 1.58 1.81 1.72 19 1.53 1.42 1.58 1.47 20 1.47 1.48 1.40 1.81 14 1.49 1.56 1.74 1.76 15 1.60 1.52 1.59 1.51 44 1.70 1.63 1.66 1.57 45 1.65 1.51 1.66 1.63 1 1.67 1.68 1.67 1.49 2 1.70 1.74 1.68 1.81 1 1.46 1.62 1.77 2 1.58 1.83 1.73 23 1.59 1.80 25 1.38 1.63 26 1.63 1.64 27 1.74 1.60 28 1.56 1.83 1 1.49 1.54 1.52 1.57 2 1.67 1.59 1.84 1.78 3 1.47 1.58 1.94 1.62 4 1.51 1.63 1.86 1.64 5 1.51 1.57 1.84 1.75 42 1.56 1.49 1.84 1.73 43 1.63 1.52 1.72 1.77 44 Lost Lost 1.85 1.55 45 1.58 1.52 1.88 1.72 46 1.55 1.53 1.65 1.77 20 1.47 1.78 1.63 21 1.78 1.65 1.65 22 2.07 2.04 2.00 23 1.83 ... 2.07 1.61 24 1.67 1.98 1.75 1 1.70 1.70 1.77 1.69 2 1.69 1.60 1.78 1.87 1 1.57 1.48 1.68 2 1.63 1.80 1.77 1 1.61 1.60 2.01 1.95 2 1.75 1.70 1.82 1.84 3 1.55 1.56 1.53 1.77 4 1.43 1.61 1.68 1.60 5 1.56 1.62 1.71 1.68 6 1.54 1.58 1.79 1.88 21 1.40 1.95 1.74 22 1.43 . . . 1.55 1.90 1 1.44 1.47 1.63 1.71 2 1.71 1.69 1.63 1.73 19 1.55 . . . 1.73 1.77 22 1.48 1.63 1.78 1 1.59 1.87 1.72 2 1.81 . . . 1.86 1.63 1 1.48 1.50 1.85 2 1.40 1.75 1.87 1 1:48 1.77 1.57 2 1.55 1.68 1.70 41 1.50 1.50 1.46 1.67 45 1.64 1.57 1.69 1.80 APPENDIX F 125 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued W-2-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples l l / 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice %y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) %y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y> New Jersey Tomatoes ... 2>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.37 1.46 1.51 2 1.42 1.40 1.42 1 1.67 1.55 1.87 1.53 2 1.14 1.20 1.67 1.83 13 1.38 1.49 1.35 1.77 15 1.72 1.83 1.69 1.77 23 1.64 1.70 1.87 1.28 24 1.78 1.76 1.55 1.58 1 1.40 1.47 1.87 1.43 2 1.28 1.36 1.93 1.62 1 1.93 1.86 1.63 2 1.33 1.50 1.82 21 1.68 1.42 25 1.57 • > * 1.54 26 1.60 • • • 1.76 27 1.56 • * • 1.61 28 1.28 1.51 1 1.51 1.50 1.55 1.83 2 1.89 1.98 1.98 1.90 3 2.05 1.89 1.72 1.90 4 1.90 1.92 2.05 2.16 5 1.76 1.70 1.54 1.40 37 1.35 1.40 1.91 1.57 38 1.69 1..62 1.53 1.87 39 1.80 1.74 1.82 1.93 41 1.51 1.47 1.52 1.84 43 2.05 1.91 1.77 1.66 16 1.56 2.07 1.90 19 1.62 1.82 1.83 20 1.86 1.92 1.95 22 1.66 2.11 1.80 23 1.70 2.06 1.80 1 1.56 1.51 2.13 1.48 2 1.46 1.47 1.50 1.73 1 1.29 1.65 1.54 2 1.94 1.42 1.53 1 1.43 1.46 1.43 1.50 2 1.48 1.48 1.38 1.78 3 1.62 1.73 1.99 1.77 4 1.40 1.66 1.64 1.92 5 1.56 1.49 1.84 1.28 6 1.65 1.65 1.47 2.00 21 1.40 1.95 1.74 22 1.43 . . . 1.55 1.90 1 1.63 1.76 1.65 1.73 2 1.66 1.72 *2.06 1.98 19 1.55 ... 1.73 1.77 22 1.48 1.63 1.78 1 1.93 . . . 1.68 1.60 2 1.77 . . . 2.05 2.06 1 1.30 . . . 1.86 2.05 2 1.77 . . . 1.75 1.S6 1 1.70 . . . 2.00 2.05 2 1.31 2.00 1.90 1 1.90 1.87 1.35 1.40 2 1.59 1.78 1.74 1.65 126 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-l-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples iy 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2]/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes o T / 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3y Tuna Fish 3 r — Pounds per Base Box — \ Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.50 1.85 1.87 2 1.37 1.78 1.49 8 1.41 1.48 1.80 1.51 9 1.42 1.57 1.67 1.41 20 1.63 1.46 1.67 1.64 23 1.46 1.37 1.69 1.81 23 1.46 1.46 1.72 1.61 24 1.31 1.25 1.83 1.80 1 1.36 1.40 1.66 1.64 2 1.47 1.49 1.70 1.54 1 1.62 1.86 2.00 2 1.38 1.83 1.94 21 1.59 1.52 22 1.80 1.40 25 1.64 • • • 1.45 27 1.63 1.41 28 1.85 1.66 1 1.79 1.88 1.75 1.79 2 1.69 1.66 1.65 1.75 3 1.78 1.80 1.77 2.05 4 .1.83 2.01 1.73 1.84 5 1.72 1.72 1.63 1.46 35 1.49 1.46 1.53 1.68 36 1.62 1.53 1.88 1.50 39 1.12 1.41 1.84 1.77 40 1.79 1.66 1.71 1.77 43 1.52 1.44 1.69 1.77 18 1.65 1.57 1.92 19 1.80 1.93 1.86 21 1.70 1.78 2.10 22 1.76 1.80 1.75 23 1.59 1.90 1.81 1 1.83 1.82 1.93 1.80 2 1.70 1.70 1.97 1.69 1 1.14 1.60 1.78 2 1.73 1.58 1.64 1 1.52 1.59 1.93 Lost 2 1.41 1.41 1.51 1.57 3 1,56 1.58 1.56 1.60 4 1.75 1.71 1.76 1.855 5 1.75 1.56 1.68 1.81 6 Lost 1.75 1.61 1.73 22 1.54 1.55 1.91 23 1.53 1.64 1.70 1 1.63 1.47 1.67 2.06 2 1.57 1.72 1.69 1.56 21 1.65 1.48 1.68 22 1.60 1.71 1.78 1 1.50 1.64 1.74 2 1.62 • • • 1.56 1.67 1 1.65 1.76 1.86 2 1.61 1.78 1.68 1 1.65 3.63 1.77 2 1.49 1.72 1.91 1 1.70 1.71 1.77 1.81 2 1.55 1.50 1.67 1.85 APPENDIX F 127 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-3-E Age Article Months. Michigan Apples 1^2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider .' V/ 2 Clam Juice 2^2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2*/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk ....... 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin l l / 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3 T / 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 ruunuo jjci j. Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.65 1.42 1.16 2 1.15 1.69 1.52 7 1.59 1.56 1.60 2.05 10 1.46 1.37 1.75 1.63 21 1.65 1.97 1.55 1.60 22 1.60 1.65 1.61 1.79 16 1.65 1.59 1.64 1.34 47 1.52 1.47 1.29 1.54 1 1.13 1.11 1.67 1.62 2 1.66 1.81 1.73 1.67 1 1.17 1.56 2 06 2 1.25 1.60 1.96 21 1.18 1.70 22 1.82 2.08 23 2.06 1.52 26 1.53 1.69 27 1.29 2.18 1 1.13 1.57 1.50 1.53 2 1.10 1.37 1.93 1.57 3 2.03 2.01 1.56 1.56 4 1.68 1.62 1.81 1.81 5 1.54 1.49 1.62 1.61 39 1.58 1.60 1.75 1.83 41 1.40 1.39 1.11 1.50 42 2.01 2.05 1.56 1.87 43 1.60 1.59 1.67 1.47 44 1.58 1.58 1.34 1.53 19 1.30 1.72 1.73 20 1.64 1.70 1.85 22 1.57 1.62 1.92 23 1.36 1.83 1.45 24 1.58 2.10 1.73 1 1.56 1.61 1.83 1.80 2 1.64 1.69 1.75 1.94 1 1.80 1.73 1.73 2 1.63 1.54 1.55 1 1.59 1.53 1.41 1.76 2 1.90 1.75 1.16 1.10 3 1.48 1.47 1.57 1.69 4 1.83 1.75 1.25 1.66 5 1.15 1.22 • 1.69 144 6 1.55 1.58 1.86 1.56 21 1.38 1.45 1.65 24 1.32 1.43 1.19 1 1.46 1.52 1.63 1.77 2 1.71 1.80 , 1.61 1.85 22 1.37 1.65 1.48 23 2.15 1.68 1.45 1 1.45 1.53 1.83 2 1.48 1.77 1.95 1 1.33 1.56 1.72 2 1.38 1.30 1.24 1 1.43 1.37 .98 2 1.68 1.53 1.73 1 1.42 1.47 1.54 1.69 2 2.10 2.10 2.10 1.67 128 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915— Continued Y-l-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples l}i New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2 x / 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2]/ 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin l J / 2 Michigan Pumpkin \ x / 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3^ New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3^4 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top \ Bottom 1 2.10 1.70 1.75 2 1.43 1.73 1.60 13 1.44 1.54 1.61 1.66 14 1.61 1.59 1.70 1.56 21 1.45 1.56 1.58 1.62 22 1.43 1.46 1.62 1.73 42 1.80 1.71 1.73 1.53 43 1.40 1.47 1.58 1.56 1 1.50 1.40 1.87 1.86 2 1.49 1.49 1.61 1.77 1 1.58 1.75 1.80 2 1.68 2.04 1.83 21 1.50 1.52 25 1.68 1.52 26 1.70 1.60 27 1.73 1.63 28 1.90 1.83 1 1.54 1.55 1.89 . 1.82 2 1.79 1.67 1.72 1.91 3 1.89 2.00 1.89 1.89 4 1.49 1.50 1.76 1.62 5 1.84 2.06 1.67 1.83 23 1.77 1.80 1.70 1.95 42 1.76 2.00 1.71 1.60 43 1.44 1.55 1.80 1.74 44 1.97 1.83 1.83 1.80 45 1.86 1.80 1.57 •1.85 18 1.78 1.66 1.55 19 1.81 1.70 1.86 21 1.67 1.82 1.60 22 1.72 1.83 210 24 1.68 1.70 1.77 1 1.60 1.57 1.58 1.78 2 • 1.77 1.77 1.80 1.80 1 1.33 1.86 1.65 2 1.56 1.91 1.83 1 1.74 1.73 1.72 1.57 2 1.53 1.45 1.88 1.89 3 1.35 1.51 1.55 1.55 4 1.53 1.48 1.68 1.62 5 1.57 1.55 1.79 1.66 6 1.47 1.37 1.69 2.00 21 1.56 1.63 1.85 22 1.55 1.77 1.89 1 1.62 1.74 1.59 1.83 2 1.65 1.68 1.68 1.57 13 1.45 1.97 1.68 14 1.63 1.73 1.69 1 1.55 1.66 1.86 2 1.57 1.65 1.85 1 1.55 2.03 1.63 2 1.65 1.56 1.92 1 1.70 ' 1.65 1.68 2 1.53 1.43 1.92 1 1.65 1.71 1.67 1.88 2 1.85 1.92 1.77 2.01 APPENDIX F 129 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Y-4-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples iy 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider \y 2 Clam Juice 2y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2]/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin l T / 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3, Maryland Tomatoes 2>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3j/2 Tuna Fish 3 f — Pounds per Base Box — N Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.35 1.40 1.95 2 1.40 1.78 1.75 13 1.56 1.59 1.84 1.81 16 1.61 1.45 1.54 1.40 21 1.61 1.40 1.58 1.51 22 1.14 1.29 1.73 1.47 43 1.60 1.70 1.36 1.73 44 1.71 1.75 1.60 1.62 1 1.66 1.63 1.64 1.68 2 1.34 1.30 1.57 1.37 1 1.66 2.16 1.66 2 1.86 1.72 2.04 22 1.81 1.92 23 1.68 2.15 26 1.70 1.90 28 1.55 2.08 29 1.53 2.00 1 1.75 1.84 1.40 1.61 2 1.69 1.61 1.60 1.68 3 1.51 1.55 1.60 1.57 4 1.66 1.56 1.64 2.01 5 1.60 1.56 1.62 1.79 37 1.92 1.83 1.92 1.73 41 1.92 1.75 1.47 1.77 42 1.56 1.46 1.80 2.01 43 1.76 1.85 1.71 1.80 45 1.62 1.69 1.66 1.79 20 1.78 1.70 1.80 21 1.48 1.88 1.57 22 1.91 1.73 1.85 23 1.34 1.65 1.83 24 1.75 1.79 1.78 1 1.69 1.74 1.78 1.73 2 1.82 1.75 1.99 1.68 1 1.70 1.75 1.73 2 1.79 1.63 1.64 1 1.45 1.39 1.40 1.55 2 1.60 1.59 1.63 1.67 3 1.66 1.80 1.57 1.61 4 1.74 1.84 1.54 1.73 5 1.53 1.57 1.39 1.84 6 1.42 1.43 1.98 1.38 22 1.55 .1.40 1.70 24 1.48 Lost 1.65 1 1.39 1.53 1.63 1.68 2 1.59 1.57 1.56 1.67 23 1.55 1.61 1.71 24 1.68 1.78 1.75 1 1.65 1.60 1.75 2 1.72 1.90 1.90 1 1.60 1.75 1.63 2 1.65 1.50 1.97 1 1.25 1.63 1.63 2 1.38 1.47 1.49 1 1.65 1.68 1.48 1.76 2 1.89 1.70 1.67 1.71 130 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Z-l-E Age Months Article Can No. r Body No. Jr OUriQS J) 6 1* 1 Body No. 2 JtJ£LS© xjOX Top Bottom Michigan Apples . iy 2 1 1.55 1.71 1.80 2 1.51 1.69 1.87 2 19 1.74 1.61 1.80 1.67 22 1.51 1.59 1.62 1.59 Pennsylvania Apples . . . . 2 1 1.44 1.47 1.87 1.65 2 1.64 1.67 1.66 1.83 String Beans 4 45 46 1.69 1.51 1.64 1.62 1.49 1.57 1.71 Lost • 1/a 1 2 1.68 1.44 1.75 1.44 1.93 1.75 1.57 1.78 . 2y 2 1 1.72 1.59 1.64 2 1.82 1.78 1.65 Illinois Corn 3 23 25 1.92 1.67 1.60 2.05 26 1.66 • • • ... 1.90 . 27 1.85 1.60 28 1.71 1.80 Indiana Corn 3 1 2 1.64 1.76 1.75 1.71 1.97 1.64 1.76 Lost 3 1.64 1.71 1.58 1.83 4 1.87 1.75 1.68 2.03 5 1.75 1.66 1.51 1.75 Maine Corn (End) . 2y 2 40 1.73 1.74 1.94 1.76 41 1.55 1.55 1.69 1.83 42 1.71 1.70 1.75 1.69 43 1.59 1.48 1.79 1.71 44 1.70 1.64 1.75 1.57 . 2y 2 19 1.61 1.65 1.69 20 1.77 1.71 1.73 22 1.43 1.88 1.65 23 1.85 2.00 1.74 24 1.55 1.66 1.74 5 1 1.96 1.94 1.78 1.68 2 1.94 1.94 1.68 1.58 Evaporated Milk 5 1 1.44 1.75 2.12 2 1.63 1.87 1.70 5 1 1.59 1.56 1.76 1.84 2 1.55 1.55 1.71 1.79 3 1.59 1.60 2.07 1.75 4 1.62 1.61 Lost 1.98 5 1.70 1.83 1.71 1.70 6 1.51 1.49 1.77 1.37 • 1/ 21 1.63 1.63 1.78 22 1.80 1.67 1.67 Michigan Pumpkin . iy 2 1 1.97 2.03 1.74 1.83 2 1.60 1.59 1.53 1.99 New York Pumpkin 2 19 1.83 1.98 1.68 23 1.93 1.78 1.69 3 1 1.40 1.36 1.75 2 1.26 1.40 1.67 Maryland Tomatoes . sy 2 1 1.38 1.43 1.53 2 1.42 1.43 1.58 New Jersey Tomatoes . . . zy> 1 1.60 1.53 1.95 2 1.66 1.90 1.70 Tuna Fish 3 1 2 1.64 1.68 1.76 1.66 1.86 1.93 1.68 APPENDIX F 131 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued W-l-F Age Article Months Michigan Apples iy> New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider iy 2 Clam Juice 2 3/2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin l J / 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3^2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. 1 Body No. 1 1.35 Body No. 2 Top 1.81 \ Bottom 2.25 2 1.66 2.10 2.07 1 1.52 1.59 2.04 2.57 2 1.78 2.00 1.94 2.03 15 2.04 2.04 1.80 1.62 18 2.33 2.32 1.83 2.16 46 1.73 1.78 2.17 1.77 47 1.78 1.99 2.00 2.79 1 2.10 2.00 2.52 2.18 2 1.95 2.12 1.56 2.07 1 2.14 2.10 1.73 2 1.50. 2.23 1.75 21 1.55 2.04 25 1.66 1.84 26 1.59 1.87 27 1.85 1.96 28 2.04 1.91 1 2.15 2.03 2.35 1.94 2 2.19 2.15 2.65 1.83 3 1.61 1.61 1.75 1.61 4 2.27 2.27 2.07 2.22 5 2.18 2.27 2.59 2.26 41 2.20 2.25 2.18 1.69 42 2.68 2.45 1.93 2.92 43 2.13 2.04 Lost 2.32 44 1.64 1.72 2.17 1.58 45 2.27 2.33 1.77 1.75 19 2.07 2.08 1.65 20 1.79 2.25 2.43 22 2.22 2.40 1.75 23 1.74 2.52 2.55 24 1.95 2.56 3.32 1' 1.86 1.90 1.99 1.97 2 2.15 2.20 1.49 2.32 1 1.58 . . . 2.10 1.73 2 2.02 2.22 Lost 1 2.05 2.08 2.06 1.84 2 2.02 2.03 1.61 1.70 3 1.64 1.55 2.24 1.77 4 1.68 1.55 2.38 1.99 5 1.99 1.92 1.66 1.99 6 /d ,/5/6 2.07 2.08 1.73 23 2.00 2.03 1.96 24 1.63 2.08 1.98 1 1.98 2.00 1.77 2.00 2 2.12 2.22 1.61 1.89 18 1.64 1.95 1.70 21 1.75 2.36 2.20 1 1.77 2.73 2.35 2 1.35 2.43 2.25 1 2.40 2.00 1.93 2 2.31 2.25 2.10 1 1.66 2.50 2.00 2 1.94 2.08 2.18 40 1.18 1.13 2.04 1.62 44 1.53 1.52 1.66 1.66 132 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915— Continued W-2-F Age Article Months Michigan' Apples l J / 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider l*/ 2 Clam Juice 2^2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2 l / 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2 l / 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin l J / 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3J4 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 2> J / 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. 1 2 18 24 15 16 46 47 1 2 1 2 21 23 25 26 27 1 2 3 4 5 41 42 43 44 45 19 20 22 23 24 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 23 24 1 2 16 24 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Body No. 1.44 1.73 1.42 1.69 1.65 2.25 1.85 1.94 1.92 2.03 1.82 1.62 1.65 1.76 2.07 1.59 2.30 2.02 1.83 1.98 1.70 1.88 1.68 1.74 1.79 2.27 1.98 1.88 1.78 1.89 2.48 2.20 1.65 2.08 1.73 2.15 1.60 1.55 1.98 2.06 2.34 1.76 1.70 1.79 1.85 1.79 1.83 1.94 1.85 1.93 1.69 1.61 1.70 ' 1.82 1.81 Pounds per Base Box- 1 Body No. 2 1.43 1.59 1.53 2.20 2.25 2.05 1.97 1.95 2.20 2.04 1.68 2.02 1.78 1.82 1.93 1.75 1.79 2.19 2.45 1.82 1.97 1.63 1.68 1.83 2.06 2.18 1.75 1.94 Top 1.70 1.90 1.72 1.71 1.95 1.79 1.65 2.13 2.28 2.21 2.22 2.10 1.97 1.73 1.89 1.89 2.05 1.81 1.92 1.87 2.13 2.41 2.26 2.13 2.07 1.70 Lost 1.74 2.76 1.86 1.66 1.61 1.99 2.11 1.85 1.99 2.57 2.24 2.04 1.63 2.47 2.30 1.85 2.00 1.98 2.04 2.03 2.63 1.87 1.75 2.50 2.07 1.84 Bottom 1.76 2.03 1.58 1.69 1.74 2.11 1.73 2.38 1.76 1.72 1.92 Lost 1.70 1.78 1.75 2.07 2.27 1.89 1.88 Lost 2 20 2.11 1.92 1.97 2.29 2.27 2 21 1.95 1.76 2.50 2.15 1.86 2.05 2.04 2.22 1.48 2.45 2.37 2.13 1.88 1.72 2.23 1.87 1.88 2.25 1.91 2.38 1.73 1.87 2.12 1.86 230 1.55 2.55 1.76 2.14 APPENDIX F 133 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-l-F Age Article Months Michigan Apples 1^4 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider l]/ 2 Clam Juice 2, J /> Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3 3/2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... %y> Tuna Fish 3 Can No. 1 Body No. 1 1.55 Body No. 2 Top 2.03 Bottom 1.93 2 1.72 1.86 1.94 15 1.79 1.69 1.86 2.30 16 1.95 2.08 1.90 1.63 21 1.81. 1.65 1.89 2.12 22 1.66 1.81 1.88 1.93 21 2.36 2.07 1.74 2.06 24 2.27 2.16 1.69 1.69 1 1.78 1.73 1.96 2.00 2 1.46 1.53 1.84 1.75 1 1.55 2.06 2.12 2 1.33 2.26 2.00 21 1.62 2.35 22 1.80 24 2 25 1.70 • . . 1.49 27 1.68 1.80 29 1.78 1.40 1 1.73 1.57 1.68 1.88 2 1.57 1.57 1.92 1.76 3 1.79 1.85 2.06 2.11 4 2.05 2.03 2.15 2.26 5 1.85 1.79 2.12 2.10 41 1.65 1.85 1.76 2.31 42 1.84 1.68 1.94 2.09 43 1.84 1.81 2.00 1.81 44 1.71 1.66 1.89 1.81 45 1.74 1.89 2.01 Lost 18 1.79 2.00 1.92 19 2.01 2.36 1.86 21 1.79 2.08 1.88 22 1.96 1.77- 2.18 23 1.47 2.10 1.76 1 2.21 2.03 2.17 2.15 2 1.86 1.91 2.19 1.85 1 1.91 2.10 218 2 2.28 2.32 1.99 1 4.75 ■ 1.62 2.44 2.06 2 -2.48 2.51 2.77 2.91 3 2.05 1.97 2.11 2.33 4 2.00 1.89 1.77 1.86 5 2.16 2.09 1.95 1.99 6 2.31 2.49 1.65 2.03 21 1.87 v ./6/0 2.57 22 1.93 2.22 1.93 1 2.29 2.30 2.05 2.13 2 1.71 ' 1.49 2.51 1.82 21 1.71 1.83 1.75 22 1.49 2.13 2.00 1 1.80 2.11 1.90 2 1.46 1.90 1.95 1 1.53 1.88 2.59 2 1.33 . . . 2.15 1.89 1 1.78 . . . 2.22 1.94 2 1.59 1.90 2.02 1 2.25 2.07 2.21 241 2 2.30 2.33 2.08 1.90 134 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-3-F Age Article Months Michigan Apples \y 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider \y 2 Clam Juice 2^ Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3^ New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y> Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.56 2.17 2.08 2 1.81 1.64 2.05 9 1.95 1.87 2.12 1.70 10 1.47 1.54 1.89 1.80 21 1.58 1.61 1.88 1.90 22 1.74 2.11 1.92 1.87 45 1.80 1.71 1.40 2.02 46 1.86 1.90 1.93 1.81 1 1.58 1.58 2.07 2.20 2 1.94 2.12 2.02 2.23 1 1.91 1.87 1.96 2 1.56 1.94 1.84 21 1.96 1.66 25 1.96 1.55 26 1.81 1.75 28 1.75 2.07 29 2.06 1.50 1 1.77 1.88 2.33 2.00 2 1.97 1.83 2.06 1.66 3 1.94 1.89 1.93 2.00 4 1.95 2.07 2.26 1.71 5 1.69 1.57 2.33 2.01 39 2.14 1.89 2.08 2.05 42 1.60 1.62 2.18 1.89 43 1.86 2.12 2.01 2.04 44 2.20 2.00 2.04 1.94 45 1.95 2.11 2.09 2.20 20 1.75 2.00 2.40 21 1.37 ... 1.75 1.90 22 1.87 2.05 2.05 23 1.80 2.16 2.02 24 1.78 2.08 2.10 1 2.01 2.01 1.94 1.64 2 1.77 1.79 1.86 1.88 1 1.98 1.95 2.54 2 1.95 1.65 2.13 1 1.80 1.72 1.74 1.60 2 1.86 1.72 2.18 Lost 3 1.94 2.04 1.86 2.31 4 1.79 1.79 2.39 1.61 5 1.84 1.75 1.67 1.96 6 1.55 1.47 1.75 1.52 22 1.65 1.80 1.78 24 1.66 1.56 1.65 1 1.64 1.64 2.16 1.70 2 1.58 1.78 2.02 1.91 14 2.03 . . . 2.07 2.30 15 2.00 1.75 1.67 1 1.82 ... 2.20 1.93 2 2.03 2.09 2.21 1 1.70 . . . 1.72 1.50 2 1.43 . . . 2.22 1.92 1 1.79 . . . 1.78 1.50 2 1.79 1.66 2.10 1 1.76 1.89 1.95 1.94 2 1.83 1.80 1.86 2.20 APPENDIX F 135 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Y-l-F Age Article Months Michigan Apples \y 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin l J / 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y> New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.35 1.70 2.15 2 1.21 1.80 1.70 15 1.23 1.24 2.04 1.62 16 1.42 1.37 1.85 1.77 3 2.25 2.31 1.81 2.15 4 1.42 1.37 2.13 1.95 45 2.33 2.40 1.91 2.19 46 1.67 1.65 1.93 1.82 1 1.87 1.89 1.95 1.80 2 2.05 2.07 1.88 1.86 1 2.15 2.06 1.73 2 1.83 • • • 2.15 2.0.0 22 1.70 1.66 25 2.10 • > • 1.80 26 1.70 • • • . • • 1.75 27 2.04 2.30 28 1.55 1.90 1 2.19 2.10 1.99 2.19 2 2.13 2.04 1.82 1.95 3 2.05 2.10 1.94 2.09 4 2.16 2.17 2.15 2.17 5 2.17 2.18 2.00 1.89 41 1.87 1.78 2.05 1.82 42 2.30 2.52 2.35 2.14 43 1.60 1.59 1.97 208 44 2.34 2.22' 2.31 2.08 45 2.17 2.23 2.20 2.03 18 &./&/& 2.24 1.98 19 2.37 1.86 2.42 20 2.02 . . . 2.12 2.22 22 1.83 ... 2.06 2.38 24 2.44 2.36 1.95 1 2.54 2.50 1.82 2.03 2 2.03 2.06 1.83 2.04 1 1.35 2.15 1.81 2 2.23 1.91 2.12 1 1.46 1.50 2.17 2.24 2 2.23 2.33 2.13 1.91 3 /i.ti/i 2.26 2.32 2.45 4 2.24 2.16 2.03 2.19 5 1.47 1.52 2.00 Lost 6 2.12 2.18 2.05 2.35 21 1.86 2.00 1.97 22 1.55 1.78 2.18 1 2.46 2.64 2.29 2.10 2 1.66 1.81 2.43 1.72 13 2.07 2.10 1.92 14 1.98 2.32 2.70 1 2.50 ... 1.93 2.30 2 2.03 2.05 2.15 1 2.15 1.85 1.96 2 1.93 . . . 2.35 3.03 1 1.82 1.86 2.28 2 1.94 1.62 1.83 1 1.84 1.72 2.01 1.97 2 1.87 1.87 1.90 1.71 136 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Y-4-F Ag-e Article Months Michigan Apples \y 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider . . .• lj£ Clam Juice %y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) %y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy> New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 2>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 1.95 1.64 1.83 2 1.67 1.90 1.75 13 1.90 1.48 1.82 1.62 16 1.91 1.99 2.13 1.79 21 1.97 1.87 1.78 1.83 22 1.86 1.68 2.15 1.79 43 1.80 2.04 1.84 1.91 45 1.68 1.82 1.86 1.94 1 2.06 2.16 2.05 1.90 2 1.58 1.74 2.20 2.07 1 1.91 2.21 2.22 2 1.86 ... 2.12 2.12 23 1.58 ... 1.63 24 1.49 ... 2.18 25 1.42 1.97 26 1.77 2.46 27 1.98 246 1 1.58 1.69 2.12 2.34 2 1.62 1.60 1.89 1.77 3 2.30 2.15 2.12 1.81 4 2.23 2.18 2.14 2.32 5 1.71 1.76 1.91 2.14 39 1.82 1.75 1.97 2.54 42 1.76 1.69 1.65 2.37 43 1.89 1.78 1.86 2.02 44 1.93 2.09 2.37 2.30 45 2.12 1.86 1.85 2.45 18 1.96 2.30 2.58 19 1.93 2.07 1.90 20 2.10 . . . 1.70 1.80 22 1.43 ... 2.07 2.15 23 1.83 1.73 2.53 1 1.97 1.94 1.99 2.06 2 2.05 2.12 2.05 . 2.02 1 1.58 2.02 1.98 2 1.65 1.93 1.93 1 1.68 1.58 1.84 2.45 2 1.68 1.72 1.87 2.06 3 1.33 1.47 2.11 1.91 4 1.56 1.68 2.13 2.06 5 1.60 1.58 2.22 2.04 6 1.69 1.97 2.03 1.93 21 1.20 1.95 2.58 22 1.86 . . . 1.90 2.18 1 1.'67 1.89 2.23 2.19 2 2.18 1.85 2.17 2.03 23 1.78 1.95 2.48 24 1.74 2.13 1.71 1 1.68 1.89 2.12 2 2.05 1.73 2.15 1 . 1.73 2.06 1.74 2 1.86 1.87 ' 2.25 1 2.03 2.08 2.29 2 1.53 2.12 1.S8 1 1.99 2.08 1.74 ■ 1.78 2 1.91 1.99 2.10 1.90 APPENDIX F 137 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Z-l-F Age Article Months Michigan Apples iy New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider iy Clam Juice %y Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 ' Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin \y 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes Sy New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3 y Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. — Pounds per 1 Body No. 2 Base Box — Top Bottom 1 2.10 . . . 1.98 1.63 2 1.56 1.98 1.57 15 1.90 1.99 1.79 1.92 16 1.95 2.18 1.79 1.89 1 1.87 1.96 1.96 1.79 2 1.63 1.55 2.05 2.03 45 1.88 1.87 2.12 1.84 46 2.18 2.19 1.82 1.83 1 1.93 2.03 &./$/£ 2.23 2 2.55 2.49 2.06 1.98 1 2.10 2.06 1.99 2 2.35 2.18 2.35 21 2.14 1.73 25 2.00 2.12 26 1.60 • • • 1.53 27 1.68 2.16 28 2.47 2.38 1 2.02 1.79 2.04 1.92 2 1.87 2.03 1.83 2.20 3 1.96 1.94 • 1.81 2.49 4 2.49 2.51 1.96 Lost 5 1.93 1.82 2.27 2.00 41 1.91 1.95 1.94 1.87 42 2.03 1.97 1.88 1.91 43 2.14 2.03 1.94 1.99 44 1.73 1.69 1.85 1.90 45 1.85 1.97 1.97 1.90 19 2.03 1.85 1.92 20 2.43 2.05 1.94 22 2.06 2.38 1.80 23 2.22 ... 1.98 i;87 24 2.53 . . . 1.85 1,88 1 2.09 2.01 2.01 1.80 2 1.82 1.86 1.83 1.80 1 2.00 1.89 1.75 2 2.15 . . . 1.71 1.96 1 2.17 2.22 2.65 1.88 2 2.28 2.21 2.01 2.01 3 2.12 2.17 1.73 2.05 4 1.97 1.91 1.85 2.26 5 2.19 2.22 1.94 l.SS 6 2.15 2.10 1.82 1.97 23 1.88 2.40 2.53 24 1.49 1.70 2.53 1 1.53 1.44 2.27 1.84 2 1.55 1.65 1.99 1.89 18 2.08 1.83 1.87 22 2.54 . . . 1.85 1.90 1 2.12 2.25 2.05 2 2.03 1.92 2.36 1 1.87 1.83 2.08 2 2.06 Lost 1.86 1 2.31 1.91 1.80 2 2.00 2.06 1.66 1 1.83 1.76 1.86 1.70 2 1.57 1.60 1.97 1.89 138 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued W-l-G Age Article Months Michigan Apples \y 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider 1% Clam Juice 2 J / 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) 2>4 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy> New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?> l / 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... %y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 JT \J U11UO JJCX -I Body No. 2 3dOC UUA — Top Bottom 1 2.53 2.80 2.62 2 3.66 2.72 2.73 1 2.46 2.18 2.90 2.82 2 2.33 2.42 2.75 3.87 14 2.55 2.22 2.69 3.06 17 2.62 2.39 2.66 2.93 23 2.33 2.16 3.18 3.05 24 2.18 2.24 2.53 2.49 1 2.56 2.59 3.26 2.83 2 2.66 2.99 2.85 3.11 1 2.30 ... 3.20 3.66 2 2.37 2.96 3.37 21 2.78 ... • • • 2.00 25 3.10 . . . 2.53 26 2.83 2.10 27 4.50 3.21 28 2.87 2.32 1 2.62 2.44 4.55 3.31 2 2.48 2.56 3.18 2.95 3 2.33 2.55 3.05 2.20 4 2.63 2.45 3.37 2.72 5 2.39 2.28 2.82 3.37 17 3.22 3.43 3.06 2.83 18 2.04 2.30 2.20 2.63 19 2.79 2.50 4.18 2.58 20 3.62 3.71 4.22 2.65 21 2.93 2.60 2.48 2.62 40 2.06 ... 2.83 2.77 42 2.46 * . . 2.95 2.92 43 2.57 . . . 3.22 2.72 44 2.42 . . . 3.24 2.66 45 2.65 . . . 3.66 3 J 2 1 2.47 2.30 2.71 3.70 2 2.73 2.46 3.01 4.99 1 2.83 . . . 4.05 2.44 2 2.58 2.42 2.73 1 2.27 2.27 2.71 2.64 2 2.55 2.61 2.73 2.61 3 2.56 2.56 2.90 2.99 4 2.60 2.56 5.25 2.67 5 2.43 2.39 2.67 2.65 6 2.55 2.31 2.53 2.58 13 3.42 2.90 3.71 14 2.64 2.70 2.S4 1 2.49 2.28 2.85 2.86 2 2.26 2.33 2.96 2/19 19 2.40 ... 2.40 2.70 22 2.55 . . . 2.85 2.75 1 2.31 . . . 3.11 2.87 2 2.83 . . . 2.98 2.78 1 2.80 . . . 3.19 2.S3 2 2.30 3.40 2.58 1 2.61 3.12 265 2 2.28 3.08 3.55 40 2.29 2.40 2.95 2.71 41 2.90 3.26 Lost Lost APPENDIX F 139 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued W-2-G Age Article Months Michigan Apples iy> New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2y 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 2.58 3.42 3.26 2 2.29 2.70 3.18 15 2.53 2.22 3.04 3.09 18 2.55 2.97 2.55 2.99 21 2.81 2.66 3.35 3.20 22 2.73 2.50 2.55 2.92 45 2.62 2.64 2.53 2.60 46 2.11 2.19 2.88 2.70 1 2.40 2.55 2.49 2.80 2 2.40 2.60 2.70 2.66 1 2.80 Lost 2.70 2 2.53 . . . 2.73 3.26 21 2.65 . . . 2.25 25 2.41 ... • • • 2.09 26 4.81 . . • • • • 3.07 27 2.62 ... • • ■ 3.14 28 2.58 ... 2.34 1 2.55 2.71 3.34 3.71 2 4.01 4.13 2.62 2.64 3 2.66 2.51 3.03 3.40 4 2.88 2.49 2.58 2.99 5 2.54 2.70 3.14 2.S0 35 2.14 2.19 3.11 3.64 36 2.62 2.88 3.34 3.19 39 3.33 3.11 3.27 2.72 40 3.73 3.69 4.97 3.06 43 3.27 3.08 4.19 3.00 20 2.95 ... 2.76 2.40 21 2.85 ... 4.66 2.80 22 2.67 ... 2.53 2.92 23 2.71 . . . 3.89 2.78 24 2.31 ... 2.77 3.12 1 3.60 3.91 3.73 3.64 2 2.29 2.24 2.59 3.02 1 4.03 2.76 2.69 2 2.54 3.25 3.09 1 3.21 3.72 2.73 3.37 2 2.54 2.43 2.98 3.01 3 2.68 2.55 3.29 2.32 4 2.89 3.37 2.93 3.73 5 2.63 2.77 3.25 3.43 6 2.68 2.68 2.47 2.65 22 2.68 • • • 2.55 5.83 23 1.98 2.83 3.33 1 2.19 2.38 4.58 3.00 2 2.18 2.13 2.83 4.14 21 2.57 . . . 2.55 2.76 24 3.66 . . . 2.95 3 JO 1 2.29 2.86 2.81 2 5.59 . . . 2.73 2.76 1 3.08 . . . 3.05 2.55 2 2.25 3.73 2.64 1 2.50 2.83 3.25 2 2.95 2.49 3.05 1 2.72 2.97 2.78 4.33 2 2.51 2.58 4.21 2.55 140 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-l-G Age Article Months Michigan Apples Vy 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider \y 2 Clam Juice 2^ Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin V/ 2 Michigan Pumpkin l]/ 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3 l /> New Jersey Tomatoes ... 2>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top \ Bottom 1 2.23 . . . 2.47 3.98 2 2.45 ... 2.91 2.95 15 2.70 2.66 2.73 2.84 16 2.73 2.62 2.67 2.97 21 5.33 3.93 3.00 3.25 22 2.69 2.41 3.16 3.16 45 4.14 4.64 2.65 3.26 46 2.03 2.03 2.73 ' 2.62 1 5.96 7.05 2.89 2.70 '2 2.44 M./C/j 3.33 2.73 1 2.66 • • ■ 2.65 2.70 2 2.37 • • • 2.77 2.65 22 4.93 . . • 3.26 23 2.48 2.86 25 2.80 2.30 27 2,36 • • • 2.40 29 2.31 2.22 1 2.13 2.38 2.84 2.72 2 2.53 2.31 2.71 2.78 3 2.13 2.11 2.89 2.62 4 3.46 3.98 3.18 4.39 5 2.76 2.73 3.06 2.G5 41 5.43 6.24 2.90 3.10 42 3.24 3.23 2.71 2.62 43 1.90 1.88 3.96 3.67 44 2.91 2.37 2.67 3,17 45 2.58 2.35 3.36 2.59 19 2.51 . . . 2.77 3.12 20 3.01 ... 2.91 3.38 22 2.22 . . . 2.92 2.80 23 2.83 ... 2.92 3.27 24 2.32 ... 3.08 3.08 1 2.52 2.72 3.24 2.97 2 2.38 2.34 3.19 2.57 1 6.58 2.68 2.S8 2 2.54 . . . 2.63 3.04 1 2.84 2.85 3.11 2.53 2 2.47 2.24 2.85 2.70 3 2.36 2.20 2.51 2.99 4 2.38 2.26 3.71 2.67 5 2.14 2.14 2.77 2.98 6 2.53 2.79 3.17 2.77 21 2.57 2.78 3.26 22 2.88 2.48 2.57 1 3.92 3.53 3.52 3.07 2 2.44 2.55 3.07 2.96 15 2.10 • . . 2.74 2.85 16 3.27 ... 2.50 3.08 1 4.53 ... 3.05 3.55 2 2.35 ... 2.66 3.32 1 2.38 2.93 2.83 2 2.76 . , , 2.46 2.62 1 4.38 . . . 2.82 2.78 2 2.45 . . . 2.67 3.04 1 2.70 2.56 2.57 2.79 2 2.67 2.62 3.08 2.84 APPENDIX F 141 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued X-3-G Age Article Months Michigan Apples iy 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider \y 2 Clam Juice 2,y 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^ Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin.' iy 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 3^2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 2.37 2.78 2.54 2 2.72 3.04 2.87 8 4.61 6.61 5.30 2. Si 9 6.82 4.18 2.99 2.99 23 4.25 3.22 3.11 4.96 24 2.21 2.51 4.05 3.25 21 2.88 3.35 2.59 2.90 24 2.87 2.50 2.60 2.60 1 4.34 5.10 2.53 2.95 2 1.88 1.81 3.15 2.74 1 4.55 2.82 3.05 2 2.27 2.83 2.70 21 2.58 • • • 2.20 22 2.34 2.49 25 6.08 • • • 1.90 26 4.96 2.38 28 2.73 • • . • • • 3.00 1 2.69 2.28 3.29 3.09 2 2.46 2.50 2.61 3.12 3 6.75 5.67 3.30 2.93 4 2.01 2.05 3.11 3.05 5 2.41 2.34 •2.72 3.00 37 2.30 2.29 2.83 2.71 41 2.34 2.59 2.74 2.88 42 2.59 2.28 3.08 2.98 43 2.19 2.22 2.71 2.90 44 2.03 2.03 2.99 3.1 1 20 1.87 3.89 2.62 21 2.09 2.65 2.81 22 3.67 4.19 4.12 23 2.12 3.53 2.92 24 1.90 3.27 2.84 1 2.09 2.10 3.84 3.50 2 2.72 2.50 3.51 2.85 1 2.23 3.33 2.55 2 6.20 ... 2.85 3.13 1 2.15 2.12 2.78 3.25 2 2.94 2.28 2.89 2.51 3 3.60 4.19 2.76 2.90 4 2.63 2.51 3.09 2.78 5 Lost Lost 2.49 2.87 6 1.91 2.03 2.48 3.35 21 3.08 . . . 2.48 3.31 23 2.05 3.08 2.64 1 2.84 3.25 2.97 2.81 2 3.71 3.34 2,53 3.02 19 2.41 2.44 2.78 22 2.48 2.47 2.74 1 2.84 Lost 2.96 2 3.60 3.25 2.76 1 3.12 2.60 2.63 2 2.62 . . . 3.05 2.47 1 2.57 2.50 3.00 2 2.53 2.65 3.00 1 2.51 2.52 2.90 3.42 2 2.19 2.20 2.82 2.72 142 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Y-l-G Age Article Months Michigan Apples 1^4 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider \y 2 Clam Juice 2 T / 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) 2^4 Maine Corn (Side) 2^ Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin l J / 2 Michigan Pumpkin l l / 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3 l / 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 et uunuo Jfci j: jaoc dua — N Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom. 1 2.45 3.13 2.75 2 2.39 3.77 2.60 16 2.40 2.63 2.48 2.36 20 2.65 2.31 2.88 2.57 3 2.42 2.80 3.55 3.29 4 2.25 2.40 2.51 3.16 46 4.75 5.58 2.31 2.78 47 2.85 2.87 2.49 3.14 1 2.52 2.70 3.01 2.63 2 2.13 2.05 2.65 2.82 1 3.43 3.10 3.12 2 2.45 2.76 2.S6 24 2.58 2.45 25 5.69 ... ... 3.38 26 2.84 . . . ... 2.59 27 2.02 4.45 28 2.69 3.20 1 2.06 2.00 2.92 2.80 2 2.36 2.55 2.69 3.05 3 2.36 2.47 3.53 2.8S 4 2.39 2.46 2,95 2.66 5 2.72 3.15 2.62 2,83 23 2.31 2.23 3.00 2.90 38 2.30 2.17 2.50 2.79 41 2.24 2.31 2.68 2.64 42 2.88 2.64 2.85 2.93 45 2.46 2.35 2.72 2.85 18 2.41 2.84 3.00 19 2.45 . . . 3.02 3.03 21 2.70 ... 2.73 2.50 22 4.63 ... 2.86 2.84 24 2.30 2.85 2.79 1 2.36 2.34 2.67 3.10 2 3.85 4.03 2.84 3.58 1 2.73 . . . 2.89 349 2 2.38 2.83 2.83 1 4.73 3.84 3.08 2.49 2 2.41 2.26 2.64 2.54 3 2.69 2.40 2.75 2.72 4 2.45 2.44 3.02 3.20 5 3.04 2.78 3.26 2.63 6 2.24 2.30 2.58 2.53 22 2.38 2.45 3.15 24 2.54 2.93 3.10 1 2.61 2.56 2.97 2.53 2 2.05 2.11 2.43 2.46 14 3.85 2.91 2.43 15 2.83 2.54 2.78 1 2.41 . . . 3.22 3.44 2 3.05 3.15 2.65 1 2.38 2.93 2.83 2 2.76 2.46 2,62 1 2.61 2.71 2.41 2 2.26 2.64 2.4 6 1 2.16 2.52 2.98 2.90 2 2.35 2.33 2.60 2.81 APPENDIX F 143 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Y-4-G Age Article Months Michigan Apples \y 2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider V/ 2 Clam Juice 2 J / 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) %y 2 Maine Corn (Side) Zy 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin \y 2 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes ?>y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ... ?>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 . — Pounds per Base Box — N Can No. Body No. 1 Body Mo. 2 Top Bottom 1 4.38 3.10 2.70 2 2.26 3.20 2.73 13 2.43 2.18 3.25 2.75 14 3.54 4.98 3.29 2.63 1 2.20 2.39 3.06 2.99 2 4.23 5.42 3.18 2.53 21 2.64 2.39 3.36 3.11 23 2.14 2.15 3.35 2.66 1 2.38 2.72 3.45 3.30 2 6.16 5.24 3.90 5.44 1 2.24 2.95 2.61 2 2.78 2.81 3.10 24 2.58 2.45 25 5.69 3.38 26 2.84 2.59 27 2.02 • • • 4.4o 28 2.69 3.20 1 2.80 3.27 2.76 3.39 2 2.23 2.27" 4.49 2.57 3 2.54 2.70 2.75 3.01 4 2.66 2.87 2.46 3.G5 5 4.12 3.77 2.61 3.16 41 2.82 3.25 2.97 2.81 42 2.74 2.52 2.63 2.88 43 2.59 2.56 4.49 5.52 44 2.26 2.40 3.31 2 94 46 2.66 2.53 3.35 3.69 18 3.00 4.66 2,82 19 2.73 2.71 3.03 20 2.50 3.10 2.70 23 2.95 2.73 2.95 24 2.47 2.68 3.39 1 2.06 2.10 3.27 2.66 2 2.17 2.26 2.75 Lost 1 3.75 2.58 3.14 2 2.53 3.08 3.09 ' 1 2.31 2.18 2.75 3.10 2 2.24 2.09 3.29 3.02 3 2.26 2.34 3.03 4.42 4 2.41 2.39 3.29 3.68 5 2.62 2.88 3.32 2.73 6 2.23 2.26 2.60 3.64 20 2.59 2.69 2.83 23 2.57 3.10 2.78 1 3.05 2.59 3.16 3.18 2 2.52 2.86 2.62 . 3.49 22 2.43 2.65 2.58 23 2.73 3.50 3.78 1 2.75 2.90 2.36 2 2.10 2.62 3.69 1 3.42 3.74 2.79 2 2.73 3.04 3.26 1 4.76 2.60 2.86 2 2.83 2.92 2.S3 1 1.12 1.16 3.01 2.59 2 2.84 2.55 2.60 3.32 144 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Z-l-G Age Article Months Michigan Apples 1J/2 New York Apples 2 Pennsylvania Apples .... 2 String Beans 4 Cider iy 2 Clam Juice 2 J / 2 Illinois Corn 3 Indiana Corn 3 Maine Corn (End) . 2]/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) 2 J / 2 Condensed Milk 5 Evaporated Milk 5 Peas 5 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 Michigan Pumpkin l J / 2 New York Pumpkin 2 Indiana Tomatoes 3 Maryland Tomatoes 3^4 New Jersey Tomatoes ... 2>y 2 Tuna Fish 3 Can No. Body No. 1 Body No. 2 Top Bottom 1 2.70 2.98 2.71 2 2.53 2.65 2.22 14 2.28 2.52 2.66 2.65 15 2.16 2.57 5.30 5.02 1 2.63 2.42 2,90 2.62 2 2.60 2.46 3.84 3.19 45 2.57 2.47 2.91 6.02 46 2.40 2.28 2.46 3.08 1 2.96 3.04 3.57 2.88 2 2.29 2.49 2.90 3.84 1 3.72 2.62 3.15 2 3.21 . 3.56 3.08 22 2.41 2.55 24 2.31 2.63 25 4.73 2.73 26 2.54 ... 2.78 27 3.12 2.55 1 4.25 3.72 3.19 5.12 2 3.55 4.45 2.00 4.13 3 3.83 3.96 2.97 3.31 4 2.94 2.64 2.53 2.S8 5 2.83 2.68 2.88 5.01 41 4.60 5.34 3.05 2.82 42 2.54 2.55 2.99 2.68 43 3.69 3.21 2.82 2.58 44 3.28 3.08 3.62 271 45 2.72 2.40 2.52 2.50 17 2.58 2.69 3.75 18 2.63 3.00 2.68 21 2.70 2.80 3.42 22 2.48 . . . 4.83 2.55 23 2.98 5.12 2.78 1 2.82 2.77 2.70 3.10 2 3.82 3.87 2.59 3.18 1 3.45 2.60 2.45 2 3.02 2.68 ' 2.67 1 8.12 2.83 2.97 2.98 2 4.43 5.61 2.91 4.56 3 3.24 3.01 3.10 2.78 4 2.93 2.51 3.19 2.99 5 2.41 2.44 3.08 3.26 6 3.06 • 2.88 3.67 2.64 22 2.41 3.14 3.48 24 2.33 4.00 2.43 1 2.57 2.72 2.42 2.85 2 2.50 2.31 2,72 5.33 23 2.26 2.83 2.51 24 2.26 2.92 2.74 1 3.37 4.05 2.55 2 2.56 2.55 2.16 1 2.96 2.86 3.28 2 2.56 5.25 2.43 1 2.40 2.63 3.15 2 2.80 3.93 2.97 1 2.59 Lost 5.17 4.42 2 2.21 2.10 3.63 3.00 APPENDIX F 145 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 W-l-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3J4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4j/2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2> J / 2 Michigan Pumpkin . . 3^2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes ... 5 Maryland Tomatoes by 2 New Jersey Tomatoes h J / 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 *Indicates Spec Can No. 3 , — Pounds Body .68 per Base Top .79 BOX s Bottom .80 4 .83 .80 .75 21 .70 .72 .69 22 .76 .88 .75 20 .83 .79 .91 23 .85 .98 .74 *39 .71 .76 .68 40 .76 .66 .76 42 .67 .98 .80 3 .62 .69 .67 4 .78 .68 .63 3 .78 .83 .78 4 .85 .83 .85 2 .78 .87 3 .73 .94 9 .76 .89 21 .75 .91 25 .85 .93 6 .83 .79 .85 7 .76 ■ .75 .73 8 .80 .73 .SI 9 .73 .76 .92 10 .89 .88 .78 33 1.11 .81 .84 34 .81 .71 .85 36 .87 .78 .80 37 .76 .90 .76 38 1.03 .73 .89 9 .77 .95 .98 20 .72 .85 .93 11 .92 .87 .75 17 .92 .90 .98 19 .70 .80 .83 3 .91 .77 .86 4 .83 .76 .85 3 .88 .79 .96 4 .72 .77 .89 7 .76 .87 .69 8 .76 .80 .94 9 .82 .74 .85 10 .83 .78 .89 11 .80 .80 .77 12 1.00 .98 .90 23 .75 .75 .71 24 .74 .98 .85 3 .68 .77 .74 4 .81 .81 .85 20 .75 .74 .80 23 .68 .70 .80 3 .85 .92 .85 4 .73 .83 .78 3 .79 .68 .74 4 .70 .87 .75 3 .78 .84 .73 4 .93 .74 .75 1 .83 1.60 .75 2 .83 .80 .87 ial Can 146 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-2-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3^ New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider ?>y 2 Clam Juice 4z J / 2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^4 Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^4 Michigan Pumpkin 3yi New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes . 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^ New Jersey Tomatoes 5^4 Salmon , . . 3 Tuna Fish 5 ^Indicates Special Can No. 3 , Pounds Body .83 per Base Top .83 Box , Bottom .68 4 .65 .85 .64 3 .79 .79 .67 10 .70 .85 .67 9 .86 .78 .69 12 .65 .90 M *43 .67 .95 .78 36 .64 ' .69 .76 45 .69 .80 .82 3 .69 .86 .85 4 .74 .71 .78 3 .73 .93 .83 4 .90 .70 .80 17 .65 ... .78 18 .80 .92 19 .75 ... .96 22 .78 ... .75 23 .70 .83 6 .79 .91 .85 7 .78 .94 .97 8 .77 .81 .80 9 .81 .99 .99 10 .74 .96 .86 36 .63 .77 .89 38 .85 .91 .93 40 .92 .90 .84 41 .79 .83 .91 45 .84 .97 1.07 9 .80 .97 .86 13 .70 .89 ,89 18 .88 .92 .76 19 .78 .78 .86 20 .70 .90 .97 3 .85 .85 .91 4 .76 .75 .93 3 .69 .85 .75 4 .99 .78 .78 7 .73 .73 .89 8 .69 .88 1.00 9 .83 .85 .87 10 .75 .85 .89 11 .80 .73 .89 12 .72 .90 1.09 15 .60 .78 .68 16 .60 .75 .84 3 .57 .70 .72 4 .59 .69 .82 20 .65 .80 .78 22 .55 .75 .83 3 .64 .84 1.03 4 .95 .78 .93 3 .68 .83 .79 4 .63 .87 .75 3 .84 .83 .94 4 .65 .94 .86 1 .78 .83 .70 2 .78 .74 .65 18 .67 .88 .82 19 Can .78 .83 .83 APPENDIX F 147 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-l-A Age Article Month; Michigan Apples 3J4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4^4 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn . . . 5 Maine Corn (End) . . 4^4 Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk . ... 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^ Michigan Pumpkin 2>y 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes ;. 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^ New Jersey Tomatoes 5 T / 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 an No. 3 , — Pounds Body .59 per Base Top .78 Box N Bottom .74 4 .64 .74 .72 9 .53 .65 .60 12 .59 .66 .59 20 .68 .73 .72 23 M .72 .68 41 .74 .75 .86 45 .87 .90 .83 46 .59 .67 .62 3 .75 .91 .77 4 .67 .72 .60 3 .78 .75 .87 4 .70 .78 .85 17 .75 ... .55 18 .59 • * • .73 19 .68 .73 23 .68 • • .- .68 24 .IT .68 6 .96 '.84 .87 7 .75 .84 .83 8 .83 .87 .83 9 .73 .78 .83 10 .76 .76 .74 35 .76 .74 .82 36 .82 .88 .73 38 .79 .82 .82 39 .83 .99 .90 40 .78 .81 .83 12 .63 .85 .79 16 .85 .83 .87 17 .85 .91 .85 18 .86 .98 .83 21 .85 .83 .88 3 .74 .68 1.00 4 .68 .70 .96 3 .58 .78 .73 4 .78 .80 .78 7 .71 .83 .95 8 .76 .82 .74 9 .86 .81 .77 10 .69 .88 .77 11 .89 80 .76 12 .74 .69 .80 17 .51 .68 .77 18 .78 .74 .68 3 .67 .89 .70 4 .71 .74 1.01 19 .63 .78 .75 20 M .85 .78 3 .58 .65 .63 4 .74 .73 .79 3 Lost .68 .78 4 .68 .73 .70 3 .69 .83 .79 4 .73 .78 .73 1 .73 .86 .78 2 .75 .73 .78 3 .73 1.43 .87 4 .76 1.60 .80 *Indicates Special Can 148 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-3-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3^2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice . . . 4J^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^2 Maine Corn (Side) 4% Condensed Milk „ 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2>y 2 Michigan Pumpkin 31^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 51^ New Jersey Tomatoes 51^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 ^Indicates Special Can , Pounds per Base Box N an No. Body Top Bottom 3 .80 .78 .72 4 .60 .80 .75 15 .86 .67 .67 18 .59 .75 .62 20 .76 • .64 .76 22 .78 .76 .96 H4 .66 .70 .79 47 .80 .68 .78 48 .87 .68 .62 3 .65 .76 .84 4 .81 .92 .69 3 .83 .93 .84 4 .87 .78 .88 17 .83 • • • .81 18 .75 .73 19 .75 ... .88 22 .85 .86 23 .83 ... .83 6 .77 .80 .87 7 .73 .94 .93 8 .83 .76 .85 9 .90 85 .95 10 .76 .85 .77 33 .93 .87 .91 34 .84 .93 .72 37 .74 .89 .73 38 .75 .81 .83 39 .83 .81 .86 15 .88 .85 1.03 16 .84 .81 .83 17 .88 .90 .90 18 .69 .94 .88 19 .93 .80 .90 3 .79 .83 .86 4 .85 .77 .82 3 .80 .78 .74 4 .84 .75 .83 7 1.05 .81 .89 8 .82 .93 .83 9 .72 .93 .85 10 .95 .77 .73 11 .67 .91 .80 12 .82 .86 .80 22 .73 .75 .79 23 .76 .78 .6<3 3 .73 .76 .71 4 .71 .75 .88 17 .81 .75 .64 19 .70 .77 .68 3 .68 .78 .83 4 .80 .75 .84 3 .78 .83 .75 4 .65 .73 .88 3 .69 .90 .84 4 .75 .74 .76 1 .88 .83 .75 2 .80 .87 .78 3 .83 .97 .89 4 .83 .83 .83 APPENDIX F 149 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-l-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples 2>Yz New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4J^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) . . 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4J/ 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^2 Michigan Pumpkin 3 T / 2 New York Pumpkin ... 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 Can No. 3 , Pounds Body .64 per Base Top .79 Box s Bottom Lost 4 .70 .93 .75 19 .63 .79 .62 20 .72 .72 .62 18 .69 .64 .71 21 .79 .77 .74 13 .66 .93 .78 15 .72 .67 1.00 3 .64 .65 .80 4 .80 .71 .67 3 .85 1.00 .87 4 .85 .85 .88 17 .68 .88 18 .98 .83 19 .78 ■ • . .88 21 .75 1.33 23 .95 .86 6 .97 .80 .89 7 1.11 .86 .76 8 .85 • .89 1.03 9 .89 .80 1.06 10 .74 .88 .87 33 .70 .67 .92 34 .80 .76 .75 37 .82 ,80 .83 38 .73 .71 .73 39 .80 .83 .84 10 .96 .87 .79 14 .66 .81 .76 17 .82 .83 .79 18 .78 1.07 .92 20 .77 .S3 .78 3 .75 .85 .89 4 .86 1.01 .78 3 .88 .80 .80 4 .89 .81 .76 7 .89 .85 .78 8 .89 .89 .84 9 .78 .89 .76 10 .92 .75 .75 11 .86 .82 .79 12 .86 .69 .91 18 .75 .91 .73 19 .80 .75 .82 3 .63 .67 .71 4 .70 .65 .85 19 .75 .78 .75 20 .79 .85 .75 3 .80 .68 .83 4 .63 .74 .83 3 .73 .84 .86 4 .78 .75 .76 3 .70 .88 .80 4 .75 .69 .19 1 .78 .85 .89 2 .74 1.00 .80 3 1.15 .80 .83 4 .88 .89 .81 ISO APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-4-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3J4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider .• ?>y 2 Clam Juice 4z J / 2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4l j / 2 Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^2 Michigan Pumpkin 3^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5J-4 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Pounds per Base Box ^ Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 .65 .83 .87 4 .73 .88 .88 21 .75 .87 .77 22 .58 .69 .73 21 .72 .86 .86 22 .67 .91 .91 42 .84 .72 .80 44 .69 .78 .88 3 .73 .83 .93 4 .84 .72 .73 3 .88 .91 .90 4 1.00 4.89 4.87 18 .93 ... .79 19 .88 . . i .79 20 .78 .84 22 .90 . • • .84 24 .74 . - . .85 6 .91 1.08 .94 7 .93 .80 .81 8 .80 .75 .83 9 .83 .91 .84 10 .82 .76 .76 35 .95 .93 .87 36 1.03 .93 .89 38 .90 .78 1.00 39 .86 .97 .78 40 .92 .80 .92 10 .88 .90 1.10 14 .83 .80 .78 19 .98 .94 .78 20 .80 .67 .83 24 .80 .90 1.03 3 ' .88 .94 .81 4 .85 .92 .79 3 .78 .78 .98 4 .73 .80 .92 7 .87 .90 .89 8 .78 .79 .85 9 .79 .84 .92 10 .87 .91 .80 11 .87 .85 .83 12 .95 .90 .87 20 .70 97 .83 22 .84 .82 .78 3 .67 .71 .86 4 .74 .71 .78 15 .74 .96 .78 16 .85 .79 .95 3 .93 .97 .73 4 .76 .83 .98 3 .71 .93 .87 4 .75 .75 .78 3 .83 .88 .74 4 .78 .83 .83 1 .89 .93 .S^ 2 .89 .86 .74 3 .93 .78 .81 4 .85 .78 .67 APPENDIX F 151 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Z-l-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples dy 2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4*/£ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) ^/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) ^/ 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk . . 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^2 Michigan Pumpkin 3^2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes h 1 /?. New Jersey Tomatoes 5J^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Pounds per Base BOX ^ Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 .65 .78 .78 4 .83 .75 .79 16 .68 .70 .68 23 .57 .65 .72 16 .79 .77 .78 20 .73 .79 .80 43 .71 .96 .73 44 .84 .76 .83 3 .71 .80 .77 4 .84 .73 .83 3 .90 .93 .84 4 .88 .88 .87 16 .79 .83 17 .84 .88 18 .83 . . . .74 20 .76 .98 21 .78 .88 6 .81 .99 .82 7 .86 .80 .87 8 .76 .95 .79 9 .81 .84 .75 10 .75 .82 .57 34 .77 .74 .79 35 .68 .95 .75 36 .80 .71 .91 38 .79 .83 .88 40 .71 .81 .88 10 .78 .88 .87 14 .80 .80 .78 17 .93 .87 .75 18 .83 .98 .95 21 .93 .85 1.05 3 .84 .88 .80 4 .87 1.28 .77 3 .80 .83 . r <8 4 .93 .70 .79 7 .93 .74 .75 8 .73 .91 .85 9 .82 .70 .95 10 .79 .88 .86 11 .82 .72 .84 12 .87 .91 .93 '20 .78 .76 .74 21 .71 .68 .64 3 .73 .74 .81 4 .71 .69 .69 21 .73 .70 .76 22 .85 .75 .84 3 .73 .83 .58 4 .73 .78 .82 3 .68 .63 68 4 .75 .78 .73 3 .80 .74 .78 4 .73 .87 .89 1 .95 .84 .80 2 .78 .79 .69 3 .89 .74 .81 4 .79 .79 71 152 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916— Continued W-l-B Article Months Michigan Apples Sy 2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples < . 4 String Beans 6 Cider 2>Vz Clam Juice 4^4 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4J4 Maine Corn ( Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2> J / 2 Michigan Pumpkin 3J^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5% Salmon 3 Tuna Fish ,. 5 ^Indicates Special Can , — Pounds per Base Box N an No. Body Top Bottom 3 .68 .96 .93 4 .83 1.04 .93 18 .80 .96 .95 19 .88 .89 .77 11 .81 .99 .92 12 .82 1.01 .95 '41 ■ .68 1.05 .83 43 .73 1.05 .89 47 .97 .91 1.04 3 .82 1.05 1.04 4 .76 .86 .86 3 1.08 1.19 1.25 4 1.07 1.15 1.15 17 .91 ... 1.00 18 1.08 ... 1.05 21 .89 . . . 1.10 23 .95 . . . .86 24 .92 1.05 6 1.06 .96 .82 7 .93 1.03 1.08 8 1.06 1.07 1.02 9 1.07 .94 1.04 10 .99 1.13 1.16 34 1.04 1.37 1.08 35 .93 1.00 1.14 36 1.15 .95 .85 39 1.05 .97 .99 41 1.03 1.08 1.29 13 .73 1.07 1.05 14 .89 1.08 1.10 19 .89 1.22 1.04 17 .86 1.11 1.12 18 .84 1.17 1.16 3 1.04 .96 1.19 4 1.07 1.11 1.04 3 .81 .99 1.15 4 .90 1.21 1.24 7 .97 1.07 1.09 8 .95 .88 1.10 9 .93 1.03 1.08 10 .75 1.04 1.18 11 1.13 1.01 1.10 12 1.02 1.15 1.20 23 .82 1.08 .93 24 .80 .85 .83 3 .95 .93 .75 4 .85 .99 .83 20 1.00 1.05 1.03 23 .89 1.03 1.08 3 .88 1.15 .83 4 .85 1.20 .93 3 1.13 1.00 .94 4 1.09 1.15 1.12 3 1.05 1.12 .98 4 .95 .96 .98 1 1.20 .96 .78 2 .93 .83 1.06 42 1.05 1.11 1.08 47 1.10 1.05 1.04 APPENDIX F 153 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-2-B Age Article Month; Michigan Apples 3^ New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4J/ 2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 4J/ 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2>y 2 Michigan Pumpkin 3y 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes §y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5 J / 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Pou ids per Base Box N 'an No. Body Top Bottom 3 .88 1.08 .95 4 .78 .94 .83 3 .76 .93 .97 5 .93 91 .85 15 .74 1.01 .93 16 .83 1.07 1.03 HI .75 .96 .87 43 ,83 .96 .80 44 .85 1.04 .95 3 .70 1.00 .84 4 .85 .82 .88 3 1.00 1.05 .87 4 .95 1.05 95 17 1.03 .89 18 .85 .98 19 .90 .98 22 .83 1.05 23 1.00 1.09 6 .84 1.03 1.07 7 1.06. 1.05 1.09 8 1.13 1.05 1.18 9 1.03 1.00 1.04 10 1.06 1.13 1.11 34 1.07 .99 1.04 37 .95 .91 1.28 38 1.07 1.22 1.15 39 .94 1.20 1.17 40 1.24 1.04 1.19 13 1.07 1.02 1.98 14 1.04 1.18 1.12 17 .97 . 1.02 1.10 18 1.10 .84 1.10 19 1.18 1.03 .88 3 .94 1.12 .92 4 .96 .96 1.21 3 .97 1.12 1.83 4 1.18 .92 .95 7 1.08 .98 .95 8 .98 1.04 .88 9 .93 98 .95 10 1.01 1.02 1.02 11 .81 .98 1.13 12 .87 1.08 .96 15 .94 .83 .89 20 .63 1.15 .96 3 .94 1.03 .84 4 .91 .85 .87 15 .80 .98 1.18 18 1.08 .95 .98 3 1.38 1.06 1.08 4 1.03 73 .89 3 .87 .95 1.12 4 1.03 .85 .89 3 .96 1.08 1.10 4 .83 .95 1.10 1 .94 1.15 .S8 2 1.28 1.02 .98 3 .95 .83 .84 4 1.04 .90 1.02 indicates Special Can 154 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-l-B Age Article Month: Michigan Apples 3^ New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider ?>y 2 Clam Juice 4*/> Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4J^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3J^ Michigan Pumpkin 3^2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , — Pour ids per Base Box s an No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.00 1.13 1.22 4 1.10 1.09 .83 9 .77 .99 .96 12 .87 .89 .84 23 .86 .80 .99 24 .82 .80 1.05 43 1.06 .96 .94 41 1.08 .88 .84 42 .96 .91 .73 3 .76 .96 .85 4 .76 .97 .89 3 .93 Lost 1.25 4 .93 1.04 1.05 17 .78 1.03 18 .85 ... 1.03 19 .93 .89 20 .93 1.03 23 .78 1.00 6 .91 1.03 1.03 7 1.09 .94 1.04 8 1.07 .91 1.18 9 1.04 .96 1.04 10 .99 .97 .92 33 1.10 1.08 1.12 34 1.15 1.10 1.06 37 .84 1.00 .98 38 1.00 .98 .98 39 .88 1.17 .97 12 .96 1.16 1.00 16 .96 1.05 1.03 17 1.12 .97 1.00 18 1.12 .98 1.03 21 .98 1.18 1.00 3 .95 .96 1.02 4 1.00 .89 .90 3 1.00 1.10 .98 4 .98 .98 1.28 7 .89 1.18 .96 8 .87 1.01 1.05 9 .93 1.18 1.12 10 1.16 1.10 1.10 11 .97 .86 1.31 12 .87 1.07 .98 21 .80 .98 .65 22 .86 .85 .81 3 .81 .91 .93 4 .86 .94 .99 14 .94 .96 1.08 20 1.00 1.08 .99 3 .83 .90 .98 4 .84 .88 1.03 3 .97 .97 1.10 4 .74 .70 .85 3 .90 .90 .90 4 .83' 1.04 .95 1 1.00 .85 .98 2 .89 .83 1.04 3 1.16 1.11 1.09 4 1.21 1.05 .95 *Indicates Special Can APPENDIX F 155 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-3-B Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3*4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider %y 2 Clam Juice 4J^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) ±y 2 Maine Corn (Side) Ay 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2>y 2 Michigan Pumpkin 2>y 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes h T / 2 New Jersey Tomatoes §y 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 an No. 3 , Pounds per Base Body Top .98 1.10 Box N Bottom .83 4 .84 .94 1.14 13 .75 .96 .76 15 .78 .98 .93 20 .92 .94 1.08 22 86 1.10 1.13 ^22 .87 1.08 1.10 47 .83 1.06 1.00 48 .81 .95 1.04 3 1.02 .92 .91 4 .95 1.16 1.02 3 .98 1.18 .98 4 " 1.12 1.14 1.15 17 1.00 1.08 18 1.00 1.08 19 .95 1.07 21 .98 1.08 23 .85 1.03 6 1.11 1.04 1.11 7 1.11 1.06 1.09 8 .93 1.06 1.07 9 .87 1.23 1.11 10 .97 1.14 1.02 34 .88 1.20 1.09 36 1.08 1.05 1.19 40 .91 1.12 1.01 41 1.08 .87 1.21 45 1.22 1.22 .96 14 .83 1.15 1.11 15 .87 1.28 17 .90 1.08 .98 18 1.08 1.38 1.12 1.04 21 .98 .90 .85 3 1.06 1.22 1.17 4 1.05 1.02 1.14 3 .98 1.19 1.15 4 1.05 1.15 .91 7 .97 1.09 1.00 8 1.18 1.24 1.06 9 .82 1.18 1.16 10 .87 1.14 1.02 11 .88 1.05 1.06 12 1.16 1.16 1.27 23 .78 .98 1.08 24 .61 1.06 1.05 3 1.02 .95 1.16 4 .94 1.10 1.05 19 1.10 1.04 .97 22 .93 1.19 .94 3 .73 .98 1.22 4 .93 1.08 1.30 3 1.05 1.05 1.02 4 .89 .82 1.16 3 .76 1.17 1.03 4 1.05 1.00 1.04 1 1.12 1.22 1.12 2 1.18 1.08 1.15 3 1.08 1.23 1.18 4 1.04 1.14 1.09 *Indicates Special Can 156 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916: — Continued Y-l-B Article Months Michigan Apples 3^2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4J/2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^4 Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3J^ Michigan Pumpkin 3J^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^2 New Jersey Tomatoes hy 2 ialmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 Can No. 3 , Pounds Body .78 per Base Top 1.23 Box x Bottom 1.03 4 .95 1.03 1.03 9 .92 .98 .83 10 .75 1.19 .80 18 .86 1.01 1.08 21 .74 1.02 1.03 21 1.06 1.41 1.06 22 .90 .94 1.16 3 .94 1.20 .93 4 1.15 1.07 1.05 3 1.07 1.10 .89 4 1.19 1.08 1.22 16 .78 1.05 17 .89 . . • 1.08 18 .88 ... 1.07 19 .94 . . • 1.22 21 1.03 1.15 6 1.14 1.14 1.13 7 .78 1.15 1.11 8 .80 , .97 1.16 9 1.01 1.22 1.22 10 .87 1.06 1.27 33 1.11 1.22 1.07 34 .87 1.17 1.17 35 .92 1.05 1.18 38 1.17 1.43 1.01 39 .81 1.24 1.12 12 .87 1.37 1.19 15 .90 1.12 1.10 16 .88 ' 1.18 1.08 17 .77 1.24 1.28 20 1.07 1.10 1.23 3 1.11 1.31 .92 4 1.14 1.22 1.06 3 1.08 1.07 1.20 4 1.00 1.12 1.10 7 .73 1.15 .94 8 1.03 1.10 1.03 9 1.05 1.00 1.04 10 1.07 1.10 1.08 11 1.00 1.25 1.05 12 .91 1.09 1.01 23 .91 1.03 1.21 24 .81 .98 .93 3 .88 1.00 .94 4 .94 1.02 1.05 13 .83 1.12 1.03 14 1.00 1.08 .96 3 .96 1.08 1.15 4 1.05 1.15 1.03 3 1.00 1.15 4 .75 1.16 1.03 3 .93 1.20 1.18 4 1.15 1.14 1.10 1 .89 1.18 1.06 2 1.16 .94 1.08 3 .93 1.19 1.06 4 .87 .97 1.10 APPENDIX F 157 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-4-B Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3^ New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3y 2 Clam Juice 4^4 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4J^ Maine Corn (Side) 4z J / 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^4 Michigan Pumpkin 3^2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes . . 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Poun 3s per Base Box s Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 .90 1.05 .83 4 .93 1.19 .95 15 .95 .90 .88 16 .96 1.01 1.15 21 .90 .94 .89 22 1.14 1.05 .84 21 .85 1.01 1.00 22 .81 .91 1.00 3 .89 .99 1.04 4 .96 .85 .90 3 1.68 1.14 .98 4 1.03 1.04 1.21 18 .87 1.05 19 .92 1.05 20 .95 1.15 22 .88 1.10 24 .95 1.06 6 1.08 .93 1.05 7 .90 1.01 1.00 8 1.04 1.06 1.14 9 .96 .99 1.06 10 1.02 1.07 .92 33 .95 1.04 1.10 34 1.09 .93 1.04 35 1.07 .95 1.18 36 1.16 .88 1.04 40 1.08 1.12 1.14 12 1.05 1.08 1.12 16 1.12 .97 1.12 17 1.04 1.08 .95 20 .85 1.10 1.18 21 1.08 1.10 1.03 3 1.02 1.07 1.13 4 1.17 1.12 1.12 3 1.03 1.05 .95 4 .95 1.16 1.08 7 .88 .94 1.08 8 1.01 1.03 1.03 9 .93 1.39 1.09 10 1.03 1.03 1.04 11 1.04 1.3 i 1.00 12 .98 1.00 .95 18 .73 1.00 1.09 20 .98 .89 .75 3 .94 .97 1.03 4 .86 .86 .93 15 .93 .87 .99 16 .74 .91 .97 3 .86 .93 1.04 4 .74 .86 .87 3 1.00 .98 .90 4 .85 .93 1.08 3 .89 .93 1.07 4 .78 1.03 1.08 1 .90 1.25 1.08 2 .93 .98 .95 3 .94 1.06 1.04 4 .91 1.05 1.01 158 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Z-l-B Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3y 2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4^4 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn ' 5 Maine Corn (End) ^A Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3% Michigan Pumpkin . . . 3}4 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5j4 New Jersey Tomatoes §y 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , — ■ Pounds 5 per Base Box N Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 .95 .80 .98 4 1.25 .98 .98 20 .91 .93 .96 23 .89 .95 .85 23 1.02 1.02 1.12 24 1.11 1.12 .96 44 1.13 1.14 1.11 45 .86 1.08 .99 3 .99 1.07 1.02 4 1.09 1.12 .94 3 ... 1.14 ... 4 1.16 1.00 1.27 18 1.08 1.28 19 .94 ... .91 20 .94 ... 1.05 22 .89 ... 1.18 23 1.12 1.08 6 1.01 1.27 1.10 7 1.02 .99 1.04 8 1.17 99 1.17 9 1.15 1.15 1.32 10 1.08 1.18 1.08 35 1.09 1.13 1.17 36 1.11 1.23 1.07 38 1.02 1.18 1.12 39 1.10 1.20 1.19 40 1.03 1.17 1.16 10 1.03 1.09 . . . 14 .90 1.32 1.15 17 1.12 1.06 .93 18 1.01 .93 21 1.04 .93 1.24 3 1.04 1.25 1.16 4 1.03 1.27 1.13 3 .94 1.18 1.30 4 .94 1.18 .83 7 .89 1.09 .99 8 1.00 1.06 .90 9 1.07 1.00 1.05 10 1.00 1.04 .94 11 1.09 1.18 1.07 12 1.10 1.13 1.32 20 .76 .77 .87 21 .95 .78 .93 3 .89 1.24 ... 4 1.12 1.10 .93 20 1.22 1.12 1.15 21 .95 1.15 .90 3 1.15 1.10 1.20 4 .94 .93 1.19 3 1.08 1.03 1.13 4 1.08 1.03 .89 3 1.05 1.13 1.00 4 1.15 .98 1.16 1 .90 1.18 1.05 2 .95 1.15 1.08 3 .94 1.28 .99 4 1.09 .88 .97 APPENDIX F 159 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-l-C Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 3^ 3 4 New York Apples 4 5 11 Pennsylvania Apples 4 23 24 String Beans 6 *42 21 22 Cider 2>y 2 3 4 Clam Juice 4^ 3 4 Illinois Corn 5 17 18 19 24 27 Indiana Corn 5 6 7 Maine Corn (End) 4J/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^ Michigan Pumpkin 3^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes , 5^> New Jersey Tomatoes 5^4 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 *Indicates Special 10 32 33 36 37 38 19 7 9 20 21 3 4 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 20 22 3 4 16 20 3 4 3 4 3 4 1 2 37 42 Can , — Pounds Body .83 1.00 .95 .98 1.17 .97 1.09 1.29 1.34 1.15 1.19 1.20 1.18 1.10 .99 1.23 1.09 1.08 1.24 1.15 .83 1.43 1.00 1.32 1.23 1.26 1.29 1.03 1.01 1.06 1.12 1.22 .85 1.12 1.10 1.22 1.27 1.24 1.19 1.16 1.38 1.45 .75 .96 1.20 1.14 .96 1.19 1.03 1.19 1.16 1.28 1.08 1.22 1.12 1.12 .99 1.45 per Base Top 1.08 1.03 1.16 .95 1.12 1.19 1.19 1.17 1.20 1.34 1.05 1.15 1.33 1.02 1.06 1.30 1.08 1.20 1.30 1.06 1.18 1.09 1.15 1.14 1.49 1.13 1.41 1.27 1.06 1.17 1.32 1.18 1.19 1.18 1.15 1.12 1.21 1.31 .98 .98 1.12 1.11 1.23 1.15 1.32 1.20 1.05 1.10 1.38 1.19 1.15 1.08 1.18 1.10 Box s Bottom 1.31 1.16 .99 .83 .97 1.17 1.06 .94 .97 1.17 1.14 1.38 1.08 1.43 1.19 1.17 1.10 1.20 1.25 1.07 1.03 1.12 1.23 1.29 1.47 1.18 1.28 1.15 1.24 1.35 1.26 1.27 1.09 1.28 1.16 1.15 1.05 1.03 1.02 1.04 1.17 1.17 1.27 1.21 1.05 1.24 1.07 1.15 1.00 1.13 1.12 1.32 1.14 1.18 1.08 1.18 1.28 1.18 1.12 160 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-2-C Age Article Month; Michigan Apples 3J4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Be^ns 6 Cider 3^ Qam Juice 4^2 iliinois Corn '6 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4J£ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2>y 2 Michigan Pumpkin %y 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5 l / 2 New Jersey Tomatoes h J / 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 an No. 3 , Pounds per Base Body Top .98 1.08 Box N Bottom 1.39 4 1.16 1.14 1.15 15 1.04 1.00 1.19 18 1.21 1.39 1.13 21 1.00 1.08 1.18 22 1.25 -L.X . 1.19 ; 43 1.01 1.28 1.05 41 1.00 l.Ui/ 1.02 42 .96 1.02 1.02 3 1.12 1.30 .83 4 1.19 1.08 1.06 3 1.1,8 1.39 1.42 4 1.15 1.89 1.18 17 1.16 1.05 18 1.30 . . . 1.15 19 1.12 1.28 1.18 . . . 1.12 24 1.14 . . . 1.12 6 1.04 1.22 1.14 7 1.17 1.07 1.20 8 1.16 1.33 1.26 9 1.33 1.36 1.01 1.37 1.14 1.27 34 1.09 1.37 1.24 55 1.16 1.15 1.40 '57 1.23 1.31 1.43 ?8 1.26 1.27 1.12 39 1.27 1.24 1.27 9 1.13 1.23 1.25 13 1.04 1.20 1.18 14 1.14 1.12 1.38 19 1.14 1.31 1.25 20 1.14 1.41 .98 3 1.06 1.44 1.35 4 1.19 1.22 1.24 3 1.32 1.28 1.18 4 1.53 1.51 1.15 7 1.14 1.36 1.32 8 1.09 1.13 1.16 9 1.23 1.04 1.06 10 1.10 1.45 1.2b 11 .96 1.28 1.09 -LnJ .95 1.45 1.12 19 .93 .95 1.06 24 1.08 .96 .95 3 .95 1.07 1.20 4 .99 1.31 1.02 14 .89 1.30 1.16 24 1.03 1.36 1.18 3 1.13 1.08 1.18 4 .88 Lost 1.04 3 1.08 1.15 1.21 4 1.00 1.12 1.15 3 1.18 1.20 1.22 4 1.04 1.12 1.28 1 1.15 1.18 1.37 2 1.12 1.19 .98 3 1.39 1.13 1.12 4 1.28 1.39 1.09 ^Indicates Special Can APPENDIX F 161 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-l-C Age Article Month: Michigan Apples 3^2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider ?>y 2 Clam Juice 4y 2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4>< Maine Corn ( Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2>y 2 Michigan Pumpkin 3^ New York Pumpkin , . . 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes §y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes §y 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 an No. 3 , Pounds Body 1.38 i per Base Top 1.24 Box s Bottom 1.03 4 .94 1.40 1.22 9 1.11 1.07 1.11 12 1.19 1.12 1.04 21 .94 1.22 1.41 24 1.05 1.36 1.05 <42 1.23 1.21 1.30 43 1.21 .99 1.09 44 1.37 1.27 1.20 3 1.23 1.13 ' 1.22 4 1.01 1.24 1.09 3 1.10 1.33 1.28 4 1.27 1.23 1.20 17 .93 1.14 18 .89 1.15 19 1.24 1.07 20 .80 1.10 24 1.24 1.28 6 1.13 1.27 1.20 7 1.08 1.19 1.15 8 1.10 1.16 1.25 9 1.42 ' 1.32 1.35 10 1.35 1.27 1.14 33 1.18 1.22 1.17 34 1.12 1.32 1.19 37 1.03 1.32 1.20 38 1.09 1.17 1.29 39 1.24 1.16 1.26 14 1.33 1.42 1.23 16 1.18 1.22 1.26 17 1.12 1.10 1.18 20 1.18 1.12 1.52 24 1.35 1.18 1.26 3 1.08 1.17 1.48 4 1.22 1.33 1.42 3 1.18 1.24 1.32 4 1.08 1.28 1.38 '7 .96 1.21 1.23 8 1.29 1.24 1.22 9 1.19 1.19 1.26 10 1.53 1.37 1.24 11 1.20 1.22 1.19 12 1.33 1.21 1.24 13 1.14 .93 1.23 14 .98 1.13 1.23 3 1.24 1.13 1.12 4 .73 1.08 1.12 13 1.12 1.28 1.00 17 1.14 1.29 1.08 3 1.12 1.18 1.29 4 1.12 1.20 1.20 3 1.15 1.25 1.29 4 .99 1.05 1.22 3 1.09 1.10 1.20 4 1.21 1.18 1.38 1 1.12 1.20 1.15 2 .95 1.04 1.28 3 1.15 1.23 1.18 4 1.13 1.00 .97 ^Indicates Special Can 162 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-3-C Age Article Month: Michigan Apples 3^4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice . 4^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) A.y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 4J^ • Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^ Michigan Pumpkin 3^2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^ New Jersey Tomatoes 5^2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 an No. 3 , Pounds per Base Body Top 1.10 Lost Box ^ Bottom 1.28 4 1.13 1.18 1.34 13 1.04 1.00 1.44 16 .77 1.19 1.18 19 1.09 1.14 1.15 22 .93 1.14 1.38 <22 .96 1.07 1.75 46 1.04 1.45 1.11 47 .77 1.28 1.51 3 1.02 1.14 1.47 4 1.02 1.39 1.32 3 1.12 1.52 1.02 4 1.08 1.15 1.19 17 .98 1.08 18 1.60 . . . 1.08 19 1.00 .98 21 1.22 1.23 23 1.40 .98 6 1.39 1.25 1.37 7 1.34 1.26 1.37 8 1.20 1.32 1.62 9 1.07 1.27 1.27 10 1.01 1.40 1.16 33 1.16 1.32 1.12 34 1.06 1.24 1.28 35 .97 1.39 1.44 37 1,11 1.30 1.17 39 .86 1.56 1.38 12 .98 1.20 1.50 16 .94 1.28 1.29 19 .92 1.22 1.29 20 1.12 1.57 1.50 24 3 4 .87 1.28 1.20 • • • 3 1.22 1.43 1.20 4 1.02 1.41 1.05 7 1.19 1.23 1.35 8 1.20 1.37 1.46 9 1.27 1.30 1.38 10 .98 1.34 1.35 11 1.31 1.32 1.31 12 1.21 1.29 1.23 20 .72 1.23 1.05 21 .91 1.28 1.00 3 1.07 1.21 1.09 4 1.12 1.22 1.05 14 .87 1.33 1.18 15 1.00 1.35 1.28 3 1.36 1.18 1.34 4 1.10 1.16 1.23 3 1.20 1.23 1.12 4 1.35 1.38 1.08 3 1.24 1.29 1.18 4 .89 1.38 1.21 1 1.15 1.38 1.38 2 .90 1.16 1.00 3 1.28 1.26 1.17 4 1.24 1.01 .99 ^Indicates Special Can APPENDIX F 163 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-l-C Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3% New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4J^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 i Maine Corn (End) 4J^ Maine Corn (Side) 4% Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^4 Michigan Pumpkin 3% New York Pumpkin , . . . 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes hy 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5J^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Pounds per Base Box N Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.14 1.12 1.24 4 .98 1.05 1.09 21 .95 1.23 1.13 22 1.11 1.08 1.01 23 .96 1.17 1.04 24 1.15 1.13 1.16 41 1.05 .98 1.00 42 1.04 1.15 1.10 3 1.14 1.03 1.27 4 1.24 1.10 1.30 3 i.02 1.19 1.25 4 1.23 1.24 1.23 9 1.09 1.25 16 1.33 . • • 1.30 19 .91 1.35 20 .83 1.12 23 1.42 • . . 1.24 6 1.17 1.21 .90 7 1.16 1.39 1.25 8 1.33 1.05 1.22 9 1.12 • 1.19 .96 10 1.43 1.12 1.11 35 1.05 1.16 1.29 36 1.15 1.00 1.14 38 1.13 1.11 .98 39 1.05 1.07 1.08 40 1.10 1.36 1.16 12 1.18 1.15 1.02 15 1.19 1.03 1.19 16 1.24 1.14 1.38 17 .98 1.07 1.29 21 1.18 LIS 1.23 3 1.10 1.23 1.30 4 1.15 1.30 1.14 3 1.19 1.30 1.22 4 1.35 1.28 1.23 7 1.05 1.25 1.20 8 1.31 1.11 1.02 9 1.05 1.05 1.20 10 1.15 1.31 1.09 11 1.26 1.22 1.00 12 1.59 1.25 .83 19 1.05 .93 .89 21 .98 1.00 1.04 3 1.04 1.07 .90 4 .89 1.07 1.12 15 .80 1.32 1.15 17 .85 1.10 .84 3 1.24 1.05 1.05 4 1.32 1.00 .95 3 .85 1.15 1.00 4 .95 1.16 1.12 3 1.23 1.22 .93 4 1.33 1.22 ' 1.21 1 1.15 1.19 1.18 2 1.20 1.21 1.32 3 .96 1.24 1.11 4 1.43 1.17 1.09 164 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-4-C Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3} 2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider '. ?>y 2 Clam Juice 4^4 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^2 Maine Corn (Side) A.y 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin Zy 2 Michigan Pumpkin %y 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes §y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5 J / 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , — Pounds , per Base Box N Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.20 1.05 1.22 4 1.00 1.28 1.24 15 1.15 1.13 1.06 16 1.11 1.21 1.13 3 1.46 1.16 1.01 4 1.27 1.19 1.10 1 1.07 .97 1.13 20 1.15 1.01 1.07 3 1.14 1.04 1.04 4 1.10 1.04 1.05 3 1.21 1.23 1.28 4 1.20 1.31 1.12 9 1.14 1.36 10 1.30 ... 1.34 15 1.35 . . . 1.32 18 1.30 . • • 1.17 19 1.40 1.39 6 1.23 1.08 1.25 7 1.30 1.25 1.10 8 1.14 1.32 1.19 9 1.23 1.19 1.14 10 1.07 .94 1.13 35 1.30 1.16 1.12 36 1.30 1.58 1.54 38 1.20 1.28 1.13 39 1.03 1.08 1.32 40 1.16 1.27 1.14 9 1.12 1.19 1.13 13 1.28 1.19 1.28 17 1.05 1.33 1.38 18 .97 1.13 1.35 21 1.90 1.48 1.35 3 1.22 1.17 1.35 4 1.30 1.18 1.14 3 1.33 1.29 1.12 4 1.12 1.28 1.10 7 1.19 1.25 1.16 8 1.30 1.15 1.08 9 1.17 1.12 1.35 10 1.30 1.16 1.07 11 .99 1.21 1.10 12 1.25 1.41 1.18 18 1.25 1.04 .93 20 .87 1.12 1.19 3 .71 1.11 1.04 4 .84 .94 1.12 21 1.13 1.09 1.24 22 1.29 1.03 1.16 3 1.16 1.24 1.25 4 1.12 1.22 1.30 3 1.24 1.20 1.15 4 1.12 1.28 1.20 3 1.24 1.15 1.33 4 1.05 1.08 1.13 1 1.22 1.35 1.16 2 1.33 1.42 1.33 3 .96 1.05 1.35 4 1.27 1.19 1.17 APPENDIX F 165 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Z-l-C Age Article ' Months Michigan Apples 3j/> New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4*/£ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) ^/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^2 Michigan Pumpkin , 2> J / 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5J^ New Jersey Tomatoes 5^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 Can No. 3 , — Pounds Body 1.28 per Base Top 1.28 Box v Bottom 1.08 4 1.55 1.33 1.20 13 1.00 1.11 1.31 16 .86 1.23 1.08 3 1.27 1.18 1.32 4 .97 1.12 1.28 41 1.04 1.09 1.24 42 .90 1.13 1.24 3 1.29 1.35 1.29 4 1.23 1.31 1.25 3 1.37 1.33 4 1.22 1.24 1.27 19 1.08 . . . 1.30 20 1.23 1.38 21 1.24 1.19 22 1.28 1.19 24 1.15 1.12 6 1.05 1.18 1.24 7 1.00 1.27 1.25 8 1.17 1.13 1.19 9 .94 1.31 1.22 10 1.18 1.11 1.06 34 1.25 1.27 1.13 35 1.10 1.22 1.19 37 .97 1.14 1.29 38 .89 1.09 1.40 39 1.14 1.13 1.22 10 1.08 1.28 1.33 14 .84 1.29 1.25 17 1.00 1.31 1.23 18 1.18 1.26 19 1.06 1.28 1.24 3 1.34 1.13 1.14 4 1.09 1.17 1.15 3 1.33 1.24 1.08 4 1.30 1.24 1.20 7 1.18 1.24 1.15 8 1.45 1.15 1.34 9 1.16 2.54 1.21 10 1.24 1.26 1.29 11 1.29 1.27 1.08 12 .92 1.21 1.20 18 .98 1.16 1.15 20 1.05 1.05 1.06 3 1.07 1.02 1.39 4 1.25 1.18 1.19 20 .95 1.08 1.33 21 1.25 1.23 1.28 3 1.29 1.22 1.28 4 1.22 1.08 1.16 3 1.21 1.19 1.28 4 1.19 1.24 1.24 3 1.18 1.43 1.18 4 1.29 1.22 1.23 1 1.15 1.30 1.24 2 1.25 1.23 1.25 3 1.07 1.41 1.21 4 1.27 1.14 1.24 166 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-l-D Age Article Month! Michigan Apples 3J4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4l x / 2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4y 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3y 2 Michigan Pumpkin 3^2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes hyi New Jersey Tomatoes 5^-2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Pounds per Base Box N an No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.35 1.28 1.34 4 1.41 1.36 1.33 18 1.26 1.34 1.36 24 1.03 1.34 1.44 10 1.24 1.29 1.43 14 1.32 1.30 1.43 <21 1.17 1.24 1.53 18 1.65 1.16 1.27 23 1.11 1.51 1.30 3 1.28 1.21 1.38 4 1.13 1.35 1.23 3 1.30 1.36 1.40 4 1.30 1.28 1.33 17 1.35 . . . 1.52 18 1.75 . . . 1.59 19 1.28 ... 1.30 22 1.33 . . . 1.43 23 1.35 1.53 6 1.25 1.32 1.62 7 1.44 1.57 1.46 8 1.18 1.40 1.48 9 1.41 1.38 1.40 10 1.47 1.22 1.62 11 1.40 1.45 1.47 12 1.57 1.64 1.75 14 1.30 1.37 1.32 15 1.57 1.46 1.61 16 1.35 1.36 1.40 37 1.31 1.40 1.26 40 1.25 1.44 1.42 38 1.22 1.51 1.41 39 1.31 1.35 1.32 33 1.27 1.27 1.27 3 1.38 1.42 1.39 4 1.25 1.39 1.38 3 1.35 1.41 1.47 4 1.27 1.43 1.34 7 1.57 1.45 1.30 8 1.47 1.39 1.51 9 1.49 1.60 1.33 10 1.24 1.39 1.15 11 1.40 1.50 1.36 12 1.57 1.47 1.44 19 1.18 1.20 1.30 21 .89 1.14 1.33 3 1.20 1.22 1.44 4 1.08 1.15 1.34 20 1.20 1.50 1.24 23 1.29 1.39 1.45 3 1.41 1.33 1.48 4 1.54 1.46 1.46 3 1.38 1.25 1.38 4 1.47 1.29 1.23 3 1.48 1.30 1.29 4 1.32 1.28 1.40 1 1.25 1.19 1.29 2 1.24 1.37 1.68 39 1.29 1.49 1.32 42 1.45 1.24 1.41 ♦Indicates Special Can APPENDIX F 167 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-2-D Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples. dy 2 3 4 New York Apples 4 14 21 Pennsylvania Apples 4 12 14 String - Beans 6 *44 45 46 Cider 2,y 2 3 4 Clam Juice , 4J^ 3 4 Illinois Corn 5 17 18 19 22 23 Indiana Corn 5 6 7 8 9 10 Maine Corn (End) 4^ 35 36 38 39 40 Maine Corn (Side) 4^ 12 16 17 18 20 Condensed Milk 7 3 4 Evaporated Milk 7 3 4 Peas 7 7 9 10 11 12 23 24 3 4 15 18 3 4 3 4 3 4 1 2 3 4 Illinois Pumpkin , 2>y 2 Michigan Pumpkin 3^2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes h J / 2 New Jersey Tomatoes h l / 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish : 5 , Pounds Body 1.27 1.12 1.40 1.33 1.68 1.22 1.43 1.43 1.09 1.10 1.56 1.35 1.44 1.45 1.23 1.35 1.30 1.26 1.48 1.33 1.14 1.42 1.48 1.26 1.57 1.28 1.29 1.56 1.28 1.26 1.54 1.26 1.18 1.49 .54 .38 .83 .21 .25 .50 .26 1.56 1.22 1.30 1.53 1.11 1.20 1.13 .98 1.28 1.37 1.34 1.50 1.35 1.10 1.38 1.33 1.32 1.36 per Base Top 1.35 1.33 1.34 1.44 1.41 1.56 1.17 1.26 1.12 1.28 1.34 1.35 1.41 1.61 1.26 1.22 1.21 1.62 1.55 1.30 1.44 1.50 1.65 1.64 1.35 1.26 1.37 1.51 1.45 1.64 1.30 1.63 1.04 1.33 1.55 1.21 1.26 1.63 1.30 .90 1.23 1.23 1.38 1.48 1.42 1.45 1.44 1.16 1.18 1.33 1.40 1.58 1.48 1.49 Box x Bottom 1.18 1.36 1.10 1.00 1.58 1.34 1.30 1.28 1.04 1.48 1.21 1.58 1.43 1.27 1.28 1.48 1.54 1.34 1.39 1.50 1.32 1.75 1.42 1.53 1.59 1.51 1.57 1.49 1.53 1.72 1.49 2.67 1.54 .28 .74 .48 .28 .54 1.34 1.71 1.55 1.13 1.47 1.16 1.60 1.15 1.27 1.24 1.46 1.48 1.28 1.22 1.25 1.24 1.22 1.49 1.38 1.52 1.30 *Indicates Special Can 168 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-l-D Age Article Month; Michigan Apples 2>y 2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 2>y 2 Clam Juice 4^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^ Michigan Pumpkin 3J-2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5]/2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 *Indicates Special , Pounds per Base Box x an No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.16 1.83 1.44 4 1.20 1.75 1.33 10 1.36 1.33 1.54 16 1.24 1.57 1.65 23 1.26 1.46 1.32 24 1.20 1.32 1.51 *44 .95 1.16 1.31 41 1.30 1.30 1.29 42 1.27 1.51 1.19 3 1.11 1.37 1.56 4 1.17 1.28 1.37 3 1.33 1.43 1.54 4 1.18 1.55 1.61 17 1.22 ... 1.38 18 1.32 ... 1.37 19 1.23 1.35 22 1.23 1.28 24 1.23 1.43 6 1.32 1.35 1.25 7 1.19 1.70 1.35 8 1.43 1.30 1.41 9 1.24 1.81 1.44 10 1.24 1.54 1.21 35 1.29 1.44 1.43 36 1.36 1.44 1.52 38 1.27 1.34 1.41 41 1.32 1.43 1.38 45 1.55 1.33 1.66 12 1.26 1.23 1.42 16 1.23 1.40 1.26 19 1.45 . 1.49 1.46 20 1.33 1.38 1.55 24 1.12 1.40 1.70 3 1.25 1.60 1.25 4 1.29 1.43 1.30 3 1.37 1.33 1.38 4 1.12 1.38 1.29 7 1.34 1.24 1.45 8 1.37 1.49 1.33 9 1.00 1.58 1.38 10 1.50 1.55 1.31 11 1.40 1.61 1.47 12 1.34 1.45 1.45 18 .90 1.33 1.00 21 .85 1.57 1.04 3 1.29 1.54 1.17 4 1.28 1.42 1.28 18 1.20 1.43 1.45 19 1.08 , 1.38 1.18 3 1.34 1.35 1.28 4 1.35 1.39 1.89 3 1.15 1.43 1.54 4 1.25 1.40 1.28 3 1.24 1.40 1.35 4 1.63 1.41 1.45 1 1.21 1.52 1.48 2 1.35 1.53 1.39 3 1.28 1.65 1.41 4 1.45 1.31 1.36 Can APPENDIX F 169 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-3-D Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3 l / 2 New York Apples . . 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice . 4^2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^ i Michigan Pumpkin 3J^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5J^ New Jersey Tomatoes 5^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 *T„A;~„t-< Can No. 3 , Pounds per Base Body Top 1.05 1.18 Box N Bottom 1.18 4 1.29 1.23 1.50 13 1.03 1.57 1.53 16 1.29 1.37 1.29 22 1.61 1.65 1.35 23 1.34 1.53 1.62 *37 1.24 1.21 1.30 43 1.44 1.32 1.31 44 1.22 1.27 1.26 3 1.17 1.29 1.67 4 1.36 1.12 1.40 3 1.29 1.48 1.14 4 1.58 1.54 1.37 17 1.05 1.38 18 1.22 ■ • • 1.52 20 1.38 1.56 21 1.03 1.59 24 1.10 1.74 6 1.55 1.65 1.66 7 1.32 1.59 1.62 8 1.45 1.57 1.45 9 1.45 1.52 1.48 10 1.49 1.48 1.73 30 1.32 1.38 1.10 31 1.41 1.49 1.53 33 1.85 1.51 1.63 34 .95 1.38 1.58 37 1.14 1.65 1.63 12 1.31 1.35 2.00 16 1.37 1.33 1.63 17 1.21 1.44 Lost 18 1.23 1.94 19 1.28 1.43 1.54 15 3 1.03 4 1.34 1.31 1.76 3 1.48 1.73 1.58 . 4 1.25 1.25 1.33 1 1.74 1.56 1.72 8 1.51 1.36 1.56 9 1.74 1.83 1.76 10 1.30 1.55 1.53 11 1.39 1.68 1.40 12 1.72 1.15 1.36 18 1.18 1.18 1.09 22 1.72 1.19 1.26 3 1.34 1.00 1.04 4 1.36 1.19 '1.27 20 1.22 1.83 1.83 23 1.50 1.41 1.52 3 1.34 1.24 1.40 4 1.46 1.24 1.58 3 1.26 1.76 1.45 4 1.15 1.29 1.83 3 1.58 1.71 1.54 4 1.65 1.28 1.62 1 1.34 1.70 1.45 2 1.54 1.43 1.86 3 1.40 1.60 ] 23 4 1 n„„ 1.20 1.41 1.18 170 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-l-D Age Article Month; Michigan Apples 3^ New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider Zy 2 Clam Juice 4^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^2 Maine Corn (Side) 4J^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3J^> Michigan Pumpkin 3^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^4 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^4 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Pounds per Base Box x an No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.20 1.48 1.29 4 1.32 1.63 1.25 21 1.38 1.24 1.33 22 1.28 1.62 1.30 13 1.58 1.38 1.38 23 1.12 1.39 1.39 42 1.46 1.36 1.49 43 1.72 1.30 1.70 3 1.34 1.27 1.43 4 1.25 1.14 1.28 3 1.54 1.48 1.43 4 1.38 1.40 1.38 18 1.33 • • ■ 1.46 19 1.60 ■ • . 1.39 21 1.20 • . • 1.28 22 1.45 . • . 1.44 23 1.59 1.28 6 1.32 1.32 1.72 7 1.39 1.36 1.19 8 1.37 1.32 1.66 9 1.33 1.73 1.53 10 1.54 1.56 1.36 35 1.07 1.37 1.42 36 1.38 1.37 1.42 38 1.82 1.47 1.58 39 1.46 1.68 1.42 40 1.64 1.38 1.32 12 1.43 1.47 1.88 16 1.38 1.38 1.79 18 1.33 1.45 1.43 19 1.47 1.58 1.36 20 1.64 2.02 1.33 3 1.47 1.23 1.26 4 1.57 1.75 1.35 3 1.30 1.73 1.49 4 1.46 1.78 1.43 7 1.46 1.48 1.62 8 1.50 1.39 1.34 9 1.42 1.44 1.56 10 1.21 1.54 1.31 11 1.40 1.38 1.27 12 1.45 1.46 1.67 22 1.33 1.10 1.27 24 1.16 1.18 1.08 3 1.49 1.35 1.27 4 1.44 1.21 1.31 16 1.21 1.22 1.39 19 1.35 1.29 1.45 3 1.54 1.33 1.48 4 1.45 1.36 1.50 3 1.36 1.30 1.59 4 1.38 1.31 1.35 3 1.23 1.33 1.41 4 1.78 1.42 1.39 1 1.16 1.34 1.36 2 1.60 1.49 1.33 3 1.31 1.32 1.41 4 .81 1.41 1.24 APPENDIX F 171 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-4-D Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3J4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider %y 2 Clam Juice 4J^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn .5 Maine Corn (End) 4^4 Maine Corn (Side) ^/ 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^2 Michigan Pumpkin 3^ * New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^ New Jersey Tomatoes 5% Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 an No. 3 , Pound Body 1.15 3 per Base Box x Top Bottom 1.14 1.58 4 1.18 1.23 1.34 15 1.25 1.32 1.22 18 1.22 1.15 1.05 3 1.29 1.23 1.35 4 1.29 1.24 1.48 43 1.16 1.24 1.31 44 1.17 1.16 1.14 3 1.40 1.39 1.32 4 1.36 1.41 1.43 3 1.48 1.32 1.44 4 1.43 1.37 1.35 18 1.28 . . . 1.51 19 1.20 1.36 20 1.40 1.41 21 1.41 1.08 25 1.43 1.44 6 1.30 1.42 1.37 7 1.32 1.39 1.35 8 1.33 1.36 1.45 9 1.20 1.40 1.34 10 1.25 1.18 1.34 35 1.37 1.64 1.50 36 1.21 1.20 1.24 38 1.45 1.34 1.55 39 1.42 1.38 1.32 40 1.35 1.30 1.28 11 1.40 1.38 1.20 15 1.45 1.40 1.32 17 1.28 1.35 1.33 18 1.27 1.43 1.19 20 1.28 1.50 1.20 3 1.23 1.37 1.21 4 1.39 1.51 1.41 3 1.22 1.38 . 1.48 4 1.36 1.40 1.52 7 1.31 1.34 1.30 8 1.39 1.27 1.44 9 1.05 .97 1.50 10 1.61 1.34 1.34 11 1.13 1.31 1.29 12 1.17 1.59 1.30 20 1.18 1.22 1.47 21 1.48 1.22 1.58 3 1.43 1.32 1.36 4 1.26 1.58 1.31 1 1.19 1.12 1.04 2 1.28 1.17 1.40 3 1.05 1.44 1.32 4 1.28 1.62 1.35 3 1.31 1.30 1.23 4 1.25 1.12 1.40 3 1.39 1.53 1.53 4 1.10 1.13 1.63 1 1.23 1.43 1.28 2 1.12 1.38 1.25 3 1.31 1.28 1.64 4 1.16 1.36 1.30 172 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Z-l-D Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3^2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^4 Clam Juice 4^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^4 Maine Corn (Side) 4^2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3J^ Michigan Pumpkin 3^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5J-2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Pounds per Base Box s Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.28 1.35 1.33 4 1.48 1.30 1.54 13 1.29 1.49 1.14 16 1.48 1.29 1.40 3 1.28 1.36 1.22 4 1.26 1.33 1.32 21 1.47 1.46 1.41 22 1.48 1.31 1.40 3 1.42 1.64 1.54 4 1.40 1.77 1.36 3 1.47 1.47 1.41 4 1.44 1.48 18 1.38 1.41 19 1.34 ... 1.42 21 1.56 ... 1.43 22 1.36 1.45 24 1.36 1.44 6 1.34 1.51 1.55 7 1.52 1.39 1.46 8 1.38 1.29 1.50 9 1.39 1.49 1.40 10 1.35 1.42 1.42 33 1.41 1.57- 1.55 34 1.42 1.56 1.53 35 1.47 1.41 1.43 37 1.40 1.68 1.55 39 1.50 1.60 1.34 12 1.68 1.61 1.38 16 1.43 1.43 1.44 17 1.58 1.55 1.43 18 1.65 1.48 1.53 21 1.49 1.43 1.76 3 1.46 1.44 1.28 4 1.40 1.39 1.43 3 1.33 1.46 1.27 4 1.63 1.43 1.48 7 1.20 1.42 1.34 8 1.44 1.57 1.55 9 1.55 1.43 1.35 10 1.44 1.62 1.71 11 1.33 1.39 1.61 12 1.71 1.61 1.48 20 1.48 1.48 1.34 21 1.30 1.41 1.28 3 1.35 1.76 1.05 4 1.26 1.29 1.34 19 1.54 1.43 1.41 20 1.12 1.43 1.70 3 1.28 1.57 1.58 4 1.40 1.46 1.53 3 1.35 1.40 1.30 4 1.35 1.55 1.43 3 1.38 1.48 1.54 4 1.38 1.48 1.46 1 1.50 1.55 1.48 2 1.35 1.40 1.35 3 1.40 1.56 1.40 4 1.68 1.42 1.51 APPENDIX F 173 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-l-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3j4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3/^ Clam Juice 4/2 Illinois Corn , 5 Indiana Corn . 5 Ivlaine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4/£ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 072 Michigan Pumpkin 3/2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5/2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5/2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 ^indicates Special Can No. 3 4 13 14 11 13 *42 41 43 3 4 3 4 17 19 21 22 6 7 8 9 10 35 36 39 40 41 16 18 19 12 17 3 4 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 20 23 3 16 20 3 4 3 4 3 4 1 2 37 42 Can , Pounds Body 1.51 1.48 1.58 1.40 1.62 1.59 1.39 1.56 1.49 1.52 1.63 1.60 1.73 1.80 1.45, 1.64 1.68 1.43 1.79 1.50 1.59 1.73 1.67 1.74 2.06 1.92 1.53 1.67 1.87 1.73 1.79 1.89 1.86 1.52 1.74 1.53 1.65 1.72 1.74 1.56 1.98 1.91 1.85 1.55 1.54 1.60 1.44 1.77 1.45 1.82 1.68 1.64 1.48 1.50 1.55 1.46 1.63 1.76 1.70 per Base Top 1.63 1.82 1.69 2.02 2.07 1.61 1.43 1.66 1.60 1.76 1.80 1.78 1.77 1.78 1.60 1.71 1.68 1.62 1.79 1.74 1.72 1.77 1.93 1.78 1.76 1.80 1.78 1.99 1.92 1.86 1.63 1.48 1.76 1.59 1.87 1.88 1.76 1.60 1.76 1.48 1.45 1.68 1.77 1.80 1.68 1.46 1.89 1.72 1.87 1.73 1.78 1.72 1.43 1.64 Box v Bottom 1.60 1.63 1.64 1.65 1.72 1.60 1.68 1.64 1.88 1.64 1.84 1.75 1.92 1.94 1.59 1.82 1.78 1.83 1.76 1.70 1.71 1.54 1.59 1.96 1.73 1.62 1.87 1.77 1.78 1.44 1.75 1.62 1.78 1.73 1.77 1.70 1.54 1.60 1.65 1.79 1.64 1.74 1.84 1.43 1.44 1.73 1.95 1.58 Lost 1.73 1.83 1.83 1.48 1.89 1.88 1.58 1.50 1.78 1.82 174 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-2-E Age Article Month! Michigan Apples Z x / 2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 2>y 2 Clam Juice 4^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4l t / 2 Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin Zy 2 Michigan Pumpkin 2>y 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes b x / 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^4 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 indicates Special Can , Pounds per Base Box , an No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.26 1.93 1.63 4 1.84 7 1.57 1.32 1.78 12 1.19 1.44 1.58 12 1.90 1.72 1.92 14 1.40 1.70 1.42 ^20 1.39 1.24 1.36 21 1.78 1.39 1.98 48 1.81 1.90 1.38 3 1.42 1.46 1.68 4 1.87 1.80 2.07 3 1.83 1.98 1.58 4 1.19 1.66 1.43 17 1.45 1.93 18 1.75 . . . 1.44 19 1.93 1.64 22 1.82 1.69 23. 1.70 1.80 6 1.64 1.87 1.72 7 1.75 1.32 1.59 8 1.58 1.99 2.22 9 1.37 1.42 1.99 10 1.88 1.48 1.55 33 1.76 2.09 1.59 34 1.59 1.85 1.45 35 1.70 1.87 1.65 40 1.88 1.56 1.99 44 1.91 1.85 1.46 14 1.76 1.74 1.89 15 1.85 1.50 2.10 17 1.58 1.73 1.72 18 1.58 1.52 1.95 21 1.85 1.69 1.72 3 1.81 1.73 2.11 4 1.75 1.82 1.39 3 1.55 1.58 1.47 4 1.84 1.87 1.25 7 1.83 1.42 1.49 8 1.41 1.85 1.40 9 1.46 1.57 1.49 10 1.70 1.89 2.29 11 1.74 1.78 1.74 12 1.76 1.98 1.32 18 1.54 1.59 1.88 21 1.53 1.68 1.74 3 1.74 1.70 1.67 4 1.05 1.42 1.93 19 1.91 1.46 1.98 23 1.30 1.73 1.64 3 1.78 1.39 1.73 4 1.50 1.53 1.93 3 1.63 1.68 2.10 4 1.40 1.54 2.00 3 1.60 1.38 1.94 4 1.85 1.43 1.98 1 1.83 1.85 1.93 2 1.75 1.76 1.38 3 1.72 1.65 1.59 4 1.86 1.47 1.34 APPENDIX F 175 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-l-E Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 3^ 3 4 New York Apples 4 11 12 Pennsylvania Apples 4 21 24 String Beans 6 *41 . 45 46 Cider Zy 2 3 4 Clam Juice 4^2 3 4 Illinois Corn 5 17 18 19 23 24 Indiana Corn 5 6 7 Maine Corn (End) 4^2 Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3J^ Michigan Pumpkin 3J-2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes ... 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 9 10 34 38 41 42 45 12 16 17 20 24 3 4 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 20 24 3 4 17 18 3 4 3 4 3 4 1 2 3 4 "Indicates Special Can , Pounds Body 1.36 1.46 1.42 1.48 1.50 1.43 1.81 1.39 1.76 1.75 1.59 1.68 1.65 1.68 1.72 1.80 1.90 1.85 1.54 1.80 1.55 1.86 1.62 1.82 1.29 1.61 1.74 1.48 1.62 1.42 1.71 1.58 1.69 72 74 58 64 76 78 76 55 38 1.45 1.20 1.16 1.50 1.54 1.43 1.54 1.44 1.65 1.63 1.30 1.65 1.38 1.68 1.49 1.83 2.19 per Base Top 1.80 1.50 1.86 1.58 1.65 1.59 1.62 1.74 1.57 1.59 1.57 1.75 1.58 97 46 79 59" 54 55 87 1.57 1.71 1.55 1.83 1.88 1.59 1.68 1.79 2.07 1.64 1.68 1.67 1.83 1.77 1.86 1.71 1.68 1.85 1.58 1.63 1.73 1.67 1.57 1.63 1.56 1.50 1.48 1.40 2.08 1.85 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.70 Box x Bottom 1.54 1.89 1.65 1.46 1.66 1.96 1.81 1.69 1.72 1.68 1.76 1.89 1.68 1.13 1.65 1.38 1.55 1.46 1.94 1.96 1.52 1.71 1.94 1.80 1.66 1.81 1.82 1.73 1.85 1.86 1.80 1.86 1.86 1.65 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.65 1.81 1.56 1.61 1.87 1.82 1.70 1.58 1.74 1.67 1.73 1.68 1.78 1.66 1.55 1.83 , 1.50 1.60 1.87 1.78 1.80 1.86 176 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-3-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples Zy 2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider S*/ 2 Clam Juice 4*/2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) . 4z J / 2 Maine Corn (Side) Ay 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2>y 2 Michigan Pumpkin 2>y 2 New York Pumpkin , . . 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5y New Jersey Tomatoes hy 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , — Pounds per Base Box N Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.54 1.63 1.48 4 1.43 1.46 1.64 14 1.53 1.83 1.43 17 1.30 1.89 1.60 17 1.60 1.58 1.47 20 1.83 1.62 1.58 43 1.41 1.41 1.52 44 1.73 1.56 1.48 3 1.42 1.38 1.64 4 1.51 1.44 1.78 3 1.49 1.63 1.95 4 1.43 1.78 1.55 17 2.15 1.60 18 1.78 1.30 19 1.48 1.69 20 2.02 1.54 24 2.18 1.70 6 1.97 1.34 1.47 7 1.73 1.80 1.97 8 1.17 1.62 1.47 9 1.57 1.80 1.62 10 1.96 1.39 1.54 33 1.77 1.98 2.10 34 1.93 1.69 1.69 35 2.06 1.59 1.68 37 1.81 1.68 1.69 38 2.11 1.69 1.68 10 1.66 1.78 1.88 14 1.54 1.80 1.55 17 1.51 1.78 2.00 18 2.07 2.09 1.65 21 1.59 1.75 1.67 3 2.06 1.83 1.94 4 1.91 1.81 1.69 3 1.41 1.53 1.64 4 1.53 2.03 1.45 7 1.62 1.64 1.95 8 1.64 1.52 1.59 9 1.54 1.81 1.61 10 1.62 1.76 1.53 11 1.80 1.46 1.53 12 1.42 1.56 1.87 22 1.48 1.38 1.49 23 1.63 1.58 1.15 3 1.53 1.54 1.66 4 1.82 1.50 1.56 19 1.45 1.54 1.65 21 1.38 1.70 1.59 3 1.31 1.58 1.32 4 1.85 1.86 1.78 3 1.46 1.44 1.63 4 1.48 1.58 1.71 3 1.54 1.40 1.54 4 1.10 1.65 1.68 1 1.53 1.58 1.S6 2 1.49 1.46 1.94 3 1.57 1.75 1.69 4 1.95 1.80 1.40 APPENDIX F 177 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-l-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3^ New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider %y 2 Clam Juice 4J4 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4: x / 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin , 3J4 Michigan Pumpkin 3^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^2 Salmon 3 Tura Fish 5 ^— Pounds per Base Box N Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.61 1.96 1.73 4 1.82 1.78 2.12 15 1.72 1.58 1.46 16 1.68 1.65 1.65 23 1.81 1.71 1.60 24 1.59 1.87 1.83 39 1.47 1.53 1.68 40 1.62 1.70 1.53 3 1.52 1.47 1.80 4 1.51 1.62 1.83 3 1.65 2.10 1.78 4 1.63 2.04 1.75 18 1.48 1.65 19 1.51 • • • 1.76 22 1.78 1.55 23 1.48 1.73 24 2.02 1.73 6 1.81 1.78 1.76 7 1.62 . 1.61 2.16 8 1.76 2.07 1.85 9 1.65 1.73 1.76 10 1.58 1.65 1.80 33 1.84 1.95 1.88 34 1.63 1.79 1.74 38 1.83 1.50 1.88 39 1.46 1.81 1.88 41 1.96 1.61 1.68 11 1.83 1.58 1.73 14 1.87 1.86 1.86 15 1.75 2.01 1.79 17 1.68 1.67 1.58 20 1.91 1.65 1.69 3 1.90 2.02 1.68 4 1.79 1.67 1.76 3 1.70 1.74 1.78 4 1.75 1.88 2.50 7 1.76 1.65 1.57 8 1.90 1.71 1.87 9 1.66 1.94 1.71 10 1.84 1.74 1.87 11 1.89 2.07 1.58 12 1.64 1.56 2.03 20 1.60 1.79 1.43 23 1.23 1.50 1.55 3 1.77 1.66 1.55 4 1.64 1.66 1.73 15 1.44 1.71 1.78 16 1.43 1.73 1.97 3 1.74 2.08 2.07 4 1.66 1.58 1.65 3 1.65 1.65 1.95 4 1.71 1.73 1.68 3 1.56 1.78 1.94 4 1.53 1.70 1 1.53 1.80 2.03 2 2.08 2.09 1.95 3 1.62 1.83 1.75 4 1.84 1.54 1.49 178 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-4-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3J< New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider ?>y 2 Clam Juice 4^2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4z J / 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2>y> Michigan Pumpkin 2>y 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^ New Jersey Tomatoes §y 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 r — Pounds per Base Box N Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.53 1.40 1.60 4 1.29 1.90 1.68 19 1.58 1.82 1.95 24 1.57 1.83 1.65 23 1.57 1.62 1.66 24 1.61 1.55 1.81 41 1.85 1.45 1.79 42 1.60 1.75 1.47 3 1.72 1.56 1.86 4 1.66 1.89 1.69 3 1.68 1.68 1.81 4 1.49 1.85 1.95 18 1.79 1.94 19 1.68 . . . 1.74 20 1.73 ... 1.93 21 1.65 ... 1.88 24 1.83 ... 1.56 6 1.54 1.62 1.67 7 1.72 1.76 1.69 8 1.39 1.60 1.51 9 1.79 1.66 1.89 10 1.69 1.85 1.93 33 1.75 1.68 1.81 34 1.77 1.68 1.50 35 2.03 1.85 1.73 38 1.60 1.51 1.69 39 1.38 1.87 1.60 9 1.51 1.75 1.70 13 1.75 2.10 1.45 17 1.65 1.75 1.69 18 1.59 1.98 1.70 19 1.48 1.58 2.04 3 1.70 1.96 1.66 4 1.76 1.72 1.91 3 1.65 1.72 1.80 4 1.68 2.14 2.0S 7 1.37 1.49 1.67 8 1.64 1.69 1.75 9 1.56 1.84 1.92 10 1.68 1.61 1.45 -11 1.62 1.88 1.75 12 1.85 1.61 1.62 20 1.43 1.60 1.57 21 1.33 1.63 1.58 3 1.75 1.57 1.70 4 1.68 1.38 1.57 21 1.71 1.55 22 1.32 1.58 1.71 3 1.30 1.68 1.73 4 1.86 1.73 1.68 3 1.68 1.68 1.76 4 1.24 1.95 1.48, 3 1.53 1.75 1.58 4 1.58 1.73 1.85 1 1.80 1.60 1.73 2 1.74 1.85 1.73 3 2.20 1.81 1.57 4 1.70 1.62 . 1.73 APPENDIX F 179 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Z-l-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3J^ New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider dy 2 Clam Juice 4J4 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3 J /2 Michigan Pumpkin 3^-4 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^ New Jersey Tomatoes 5^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 Can No. 3 r — Pounds Body 1.65 per Base Top 1.85 Box s Bottom 1.74 4 1.64 1.53 13 1.91 1.67 1.61 16 1.60 1.62 1.53 5 1.75 1.60 1.56 11 1.68 1.65 1.71 18 1.65 1.58 1.56 19 1.26 1.42 1.57 3 1.79 1.84 1.73 4 2.01 1.62 1.61 3 1.76 1.74 1.68 4 1.66 1.74 1.59 18 1.81 1.59 19 1.74 1.89 20 1.75 1.65 22 1.65 1.83 24 1.74 1.60 6 1.34 1.56 1.77 7 1.56 1.50 1.70 8 1.55 1.47 1.81 9 1.75 1.78 1.61 10 1.87 1.72 1.97 34 1.82 1.58 1.80 35 1.57 1.95 1.37 36 1.75 2.09 1.81 38 1.56 1.61 1.75 39 1.42 1.65 1.69 15 1.76 1.92 1.75 16 1.73 1.78 1.75 17 1.88 1.70 1.73 18 1.84 1.84 1.73 21 1.63 1.84 1.48 3 1.93 1.68 1.62 4 1.93 1.49 1.44 3 1.58 1.83 1.58 4 1.69 1.94 1.67 7 1.71 1.77 1.69 8 1.39 1.44 1.81 9 1.96 1.69 1.67 10 1.69 1.81 1.71 11 1.73 1.71 1.74 12 1.55 - 1.67 1.75 18 1.44 1.53 1.45 20 1.52 1.43 1.85 3 1.71 1.81 1.69 4 1.73 1.65 1.56 21 1.71 1.71 1.75 22 1.80 1.78 1.80 o O 1.60 1.55 1.73 4 1.91 1.71 1.92 3 1.59 2.05 1.65 4 1.83 1.70 1.55 3 1.44 1.72 1.70 4 1.63 1.58 1.64 1 1.58 1.83 1.75 2 1.98 1.93 1.68 3 1.87 1.60 1.71 4 1.71 1.68 1.77 180 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-l-F Age Article Month; Michigan Apples 3J^ New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4^2 Illinois Corn < 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) -. . . 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3J^ Michigan Pumpkin ?>y 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^ New Jersey Tomatoes 5^2 Salmon , 3 Tuna Fish 5 *Indicates Special Can , Pounds per Base Box N an No. Body Top Bottom 3 2.24 1.57 1.55 4 1.54 1.64 1.95 6 1.62 1.73 1.64 9 1.76 2.01 1.71 16 1.94 2.24 1.68 17 1.62 2.48 1.89 H2 1.95 2.10 2.35 43 1.90 2.01 1.79 44 2.07 2.50 1.49 3 1.91 2.10 1.83 4 1.90 1.87 1.94 3 1.58 2.06 1.78 4 2.04 1.45 1.60 17 1.95 1.89 18 1.98 * . • 2.22 19 1.93 1.75 23 2.35 ... 1.75 24 1.46 ... 1.43 6 1.77 2.13 2.44 7 1.60 2.13 2.10 8 1.90 2.32 2.06 9 1.82 1.78 1.93 10 1.65 2.06 2.62 35 1.72 2.44 2.01 36 2.08 1.92 1.92 38 1.88 1.66 1.69 39 2.45 1.75 2.42 40 2.11 2.30 2.09 21 1.58 2.75 1.96 17 2.48 1.88 2.34 12 2.36 1.87 2.75 18 1.51 1.99 1.71 16 2.38 2.77 2.23 3 1.47 2.68 2.73 4 2.01 1.64 1.52 3 1.75 1.83 2.32 4 1.65 2.08 2.18 7 2.17 1.70 2.19 8 2.33 /O./V/O 1.97 9 1.46 2.25 1.89 10 2.27 1.93 2.17 11 1.60 2.33 1.92 12 2.37 2.10 1.61 20 1.73 1.88 2.58 21 1.84 1.92 2.38 3 1.36 2.04 1.96 4 1.92 1.83 1.97 15 1.89 2.08 2.98 24 1.55 2.00 1.98 3 1.83 2.42 2.24 4 1.68 1.94 2.26 3 1.87 1.91 2.26 4 1.70 2.18 2.10 3 2.04 2.01 2.04 4 1.83 1.80 1.93 1 2.00 2.08 2.43 2 2.07 2.00 2.59 39 1.57 1.56 2.11 43 2.09 2.15 1.94 APPENDIX F 131 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-2-F Age Article Month; Michigan Apples 3y 2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4^ Illinois Corn . . . . 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4J^ Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk ■ 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3j4 Michigan Pumpkin 2>y 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes b 1 /^ New Jersey Tomatoes . . . 5^> Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Pounds per Base Box , an No. Body Top Bottom 3 2.08 2.33 2.00 4 1.95 1.70 2.28 6 2.11 2.36 1.85 12 1.58 2.05 1.70 17 1.81 2.12 1.75 19 1.61 1.64 2.01 : 44 2.15 2.11 2.30 45 1.96 2.28 2.14 48 2.20 2.42 2.56 3 2.22 2.34 1.68 4 1.57 2.00 1.79 3 1.84 1.87 1.74 4 1.73 1.60 1.93 17 1.49 1.85 18 1.54 2.40 19 2.22 1.96 20 1.65 2.35 22 1.95 1.70 6 1.92 2.06 2.14 7 2.08 2.17 2.16 8 1.77 2.63 1.68 9 1.75 1.95 1.78 10 1.80 2.58 2.35 35 1.92 2.18 2.53 36 1.86 2.25 2.23 38 2.02 2.13 2.18 39 2.39 2.16 1.79 40 2.20 2.72 2.17 12 1.78 1.95 2.00 16 1.87 2.00 3.90 17 1.65 1.75 1.90 18 1.94 2.00 2.25 21 2.26 1.95 1.75 3 2.26 1.82 2.14 4 1.91 1.75 2.10 3 2.08 1.64 2.18 4 2.42 1.87 1.50 7 1.98 2.14 2.09 8 2.12 2.12 2.30 9 1.80 1.92 2.43 10 1.67 2.02 2.27 11 1.68 2.28 2.0-1 12 2.27 1.89 2.19 21 1.76 2.18 1.83 22 1.73 2.30 1.54 3 1.85 2.46 1.94 4 1.82 2.04 - 1.75 7 2.18 2.32 2.08 12 2.45 2.02 1.78 3 2.44 1.96 2.28 4 1.68 2.40 2.38 3 1.80 2.18 1.87 4 1.80 1.55 1.64 3 /d./6,4> 2.22 1.S3 4 2.24 1.83 2.04 1 1.72 2.03 2.05 2 1.94 2.19 1.89 3 2.05 2.14 2.70 4 2.30 2.45 2.24 indicates Special Can 182 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-l-F Age Article Month: Michigan Apples 3*4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider Zy 2 Clam Juice 4*4 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Com (End) 4>4 Maine Corn (Side) 4*4 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^2 Michigan Pumpkin 3>y 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^2 New Jersey Tomatoes . §y 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 ^Indicates Special Can , Pounds per Base Box N an No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.58 1.87 2.08 4 1.38 1.88 1.90 9 1.65 1.96 2.01 12 2.29 2.04 1.88 23 1.77 1.95 2.1± 24 1.51 1.95 2.11 <20 2.01 1.79 2.15 43 2.28 1.95 2.38 45 2.08 1.91 1.80 3 1.94 2.04 2.07 4 1.81 2.03 2.00 3 1.45 2.18 1.95 4 1.44 1.84 2.i2 17 1.83 1.48 18 1.83 2.03 19 1.65 1.86 23 1.84 1.60 24 1.98 2.08 6 1.74 1.84 1.74 7 1.89 1.86 1.87 8 2.08 1.95 2.05 9 2.00 1.77 1.97 10 2.11 1.94 • 2.08 35 1.76 1.83 1.97 36 2.05 2.00 2.08 38 1.83 1.87 2.06 39 2.04 1.71 2.03 40 1.99 1.78 2.32 12 2.23 1.81 2.00 16 2.03 1.99 2.10 17 1.59 1.60 2.10 20 1.54 2.08 1.79 24 1.73 1.80 2.02 3 1.88 1.91 1.98 4 1.86 2.20 1.84 3 1.54 2.38 2.12 4 2.05 1.98 1.93 7 1.68 1.97 1.78 8 1.76 1.66 1.78 9 1.65 1.78 2.15 10 1.65 2.09 2.00 11 2.31 1.91 1.99 12 1.95 1.86 2.16 19 1.83 1.59 1.50 23 2.03 2.22 1.84 3 1.50 1.73 1.74 4 1.54 1.67 1.67 20 1.59 2.60 2.18 23 1.44 2.32 1.83 3 1.80 1.70 1.72 4 2.38 1.87 1.73 3 1.53 1.87 2.15 4 1.55 1.73 2.19 3 1.98 1.71 1.83 4 1.94 1.63 1.68 1 1.59 2.15 1.98 2 1.88 2.12 1.86 3 1.61 2.12 2.39 4 2.44 1.96 1.96 APPENDIX F 183 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-3-F Age Article Months Michigan Apples %y 2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples , . 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin ' 3J^ Michigan Pumpkin 3^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^ New Jersey Tomatoes h 1 /^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish '. 5 Can No. 3 , Pounds per Base Body Top 1.93 1.56 Box x Bottom 1.58 4 1.84 1.78 1.68 8 1.93 2.10 1.99 17 1.81 1.85 1.76 20 1.75 2.18 1.65 23 1.85 2.02 1.85 43 1.90 2.03 1.88 47 2.27 1.46 1.59 3 1.75 1.52 1.59 4 1.75 2.01 1.78 3 1.58 2.20 2.19 4 1.48 1.70 1.68 17 1.79 1.60 18 2.23 19 2.04 1.63 22 2.24 2.34 23 1.96 1.77 6 1.82 2.24 2.07 7 1.81 1.85 1.85 8 1.95 . 2.15 2.24 9 1.90 2.15 2.23 10 2.11 1.73 1.56 35 2.07 2.15 1.84 37 1.70 1.73 1.92 38 2.10 2.14 2.39 40 2.25 1.94 1.99 41 1.73 1.90 1.91 15 2.03 2.12 2.00 16 1.90 1.50 2.04 17 2.13 1.94 1.79 18 1.73 2.60 2.02 19 1.96 1.48 2.19 3 1.92 2.26 2.21 4 1.84 1.65 1.66 3 1.48 2.60 2.43 4 1.63 2.68 1.98 7 1.74 1.60 2.30 8 1.87 1.69 2.17 9 2.10 1.81 1.85 10 1.84 1.67 1.71 11 1.99 2.20 2.92 12 1.73 1.93 2.65 18 1.58 1.76 2.12 20 1.55 1.68 1.68 3 1.59 2.02 1.45 4 1.72 1.60 2.03 13 1.74 2.01 2.09 17 1.56 1.89 3 1.55 1.70 2.22 4 1.63 2.62 2.02 3 1.87 1.84 1.94 4 1.18 1.81 1.86 3 1.48 1.98 1.74 4 1.42 1.97 1.70 1 1.95 1.87 2.35 2 1.85 2.04 2.08 3 1.86 1.79 1.95 4 1.99 1.83 2.09 184 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-l-F Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3 J4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider . 2y 2 Clam Juice 4*4 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4,]/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) 4*^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^ Michigan Pumpkin 3j4 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes hy 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5j4 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 Can No. 3 4 13 14 1 2 42 43 4 3 4 17 18 19 21 23 6 7 8 9 10 35 36 38 39 40 13 14 15 17 21 3 4 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 19 20 3 4 15 16 3 4 3 4 3 4 1 2 4 3 Body 1.69 1.82 1.46 1.86 2.05 2.14 2.11 1.96- 1.84 1.87 1.98 1.82 1.40 1.86 1.84 1.98 2.32 2.10 1.75 1.48 2.14 2.30 2.36 1.78 1.93 2.43 1.98 2.27 1.63 2.42 2.24 1.45 2.10 2.14 1.98 2.23 2.58 2.25 2.21 1.91 2.06 1.90 1.78 1.32 1.96 2.02 2.10 1.73 1.55 2.00 2.24 2.35 2.08 1.93 2.28 2.02 1.96 Pounds per Base Box Top 2.30 1.78 1.99 1.77 1.97 1.87 1.99 1.88 2.62 2.08 2.02 2.03 2.11 2.16 1.98 2.09 1.94 2.33 2.28 2.01 2.02 1.98 2.20 2.22 2.30 2.26 2.06 1.79 1.73 2.03 2.16 1.98 2.02 1.93 2.18 2.41 2.18 1.83 1.83 1.70 2.30 2.28 2.12 2.26 1.68 2.08 1.79 1.68 2.45 1.64 1.73 1.94 Bottom 2.14 2.12 1.91 1.94 1.70 1.91 1.97 1.73 2.21 2.24 1.38 1.89 1.89 2.10 1.79 2.42 2.28 2.30 1.95 2.15 1.62 2.16 2.03 2.08 1.91 2.09 2.10 1.83 2.33 1.90 1.99 1.98 2.33 1.87 2.37 1.64 1.98 2.00 1.71 1.75 1.83 2.05 1.69 1.75 2.12 1.74 2.54 2.05 2.03 1.78 1.95 2.37 1.75 1.97 1.95 APPENDIX F 185 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-4-F Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3J^ New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3y 2 Clam Juice 4^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2>y 2 Michigan Pumpkin 3J^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , — Pounds per Base Box N Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 1.96 1.80 1.76 . 4 1.94 2.00 1.94 21 1.85 2.17 1.86 22 1.99 1.71 1.77 23 1.79 1.77 1.75 24 1.52 1.86 1.78 41 1.89 2.12 2.30 44 1.73 1.83 1.86 3 2.17 1.95 1.66 4 2.01 1.99 1.85 3 1.51 1.94 2.26 4 1.61 2.03 2.13 18 1.48 1.89 19 1.58 ... 1.64 20 1.88 1.97 21 1.38 1.93 22 1.68 • • • 2.15 6 2.16 2.23 2.27 7 2.24 1.97 1.91 8 2.10 2.21 2.00 9 1.60 . 2.27 2.32 10 2.07 2.24 2.17 34 1.93 2.23 2.21 35 2.07 2.07 2.26 36 1.94 2.33 1.84 38 1.98 2.38 2.20 40 2.04 2.58 1.83 9 1.70 2.54 2.23 13 2.15 2.14 2.48 14 1.98 2.56 1.98 17 1.58 2.06 2.36 21 1.89 1.95 2.00 3 1.56 2.06 1.89 4 1.85 1.84 2.13 3 2.04 2.02 2.22 4 1.53 1.85 1.96 7 2.19 1.93 1.84 8 2.09 1.78 2.06 9 1.98 1.97 2.58 10 1.99 1.73 1.94 11 2.08 2.17 1.71 12 1.52 2.49 ' 1.93 16 1.55 1.72 1.68 20 1.84 1.17 1.58 3 1.76 1.72 2.33 4 1.78 1.78 1.80 21 1.19 2.10 2.28 22 1.74 1.92 1.S5 3 1.86 2.24 2.45 4 1.54 2.18 2.43 3 1.59 2.10 1.84 4 1.70 1.96 1.S7 3 1.83 1.78 2.25 4 1.68 1.85 2.18 1 1.65 2.32 2.25 2 1.87 1.93 2.53 3 2.06 2.08 2.54 4 2.00 2.39 1.92 185 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Z-l-F Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3J^ New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3>4 Clam Juice 4^4 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^ Michigan Pumpkin 3J^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5% New Jersey Tomatoes 5^2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , — Pounds ; per Base Box , Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 2.00 2.00 1.90 4 2.08 2.02 1.75 21 2.11 1.81 1.85 24 1.55 1.83 1.78 5 2.00 1.97 1.86 19 2.03 1.95 1.80 41 1.75 1.53 2.13 47 1.59 1.87 1.96 3 2.62 1.76 1.67 4 1.91 1.97 1.89 3 1.95 2.00 1.96 4 2.14 2.06 2.00 19 2.08 2.35 20 1.53 2.55 21 1.63 2.08 22 1.58 2.25 23 2.12 2.12 6 2.18 2.42 1.83 7 2.03 1.96 1.85 8 1.69 2.46 1.89 9 2.43 1.79 2.21 10 2.13 2.25 1.95 34 1.77 1.91 2.38 35 1.77 1.96 1.95 38 1.62 1.96 1.85 39 1.99 2.16 1.93 40 2.32 2.28 1.94 . 12 1.85 1.88 1.95 15 1.48 1.97 2.03 16 2.10 1.98 1.83 18 2.58 2.18 1.99 21 1.98 2.10 1.98 3 2.14 1.73 2.11 4 2.35 1.83 1.97 3 2.12 1.86 1.83 4 2.36 2.08 1.84 7 2.39 1.97 1.96 8 1.99 2.11 1.87 9 2.52 1.80 2.30 10 2.54 1.92 1.81 11 1.34 2.20 1.94 12 2.14 2.11 1.76 20 1.83 1.85 2.15 21 1.98 2.07 1.80 3 1.89 1.88 1.73 4 2.33 1.72 1.78 20 2.27 1.80 1.78 21 1.41 1.95 1.94 3 2.28 2.43 1.83 4 1.87 1.98 1.95 3 1.48 2.05 2.16 4 2.23 2.22 1.93 3 1.83 1.75 1.89 4 1.92 1.71 1.84 1 1.45 1.71 1.95 2 1.90 1.83 1.97 3 1.70 1.83 1.59 4 2.18 1.84 1.78 APPENDIX F 187 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-l-G Age Article Month! Michigan Apples 3J4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3>4 Clam Juice 4z J / 2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) ±y 2 Maine Corn (Side) 4*4 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2>]/ 2 Michigan Pumpkin 3J^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5y 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , — Pounds per Base Box x an No. Body Top Bottom 3 2.53 3.03 3.08 4 2.78 3.08 2.69 4 2.63 3.04 4.55 7 2.29 2.97 3.42 15 5.22 2.68 2.98 16 2.74 2.65 3.06 HI 2.71 6.45 2.59 21 2.00 3.29 2.42 22 2.51 2.75 2.56 3 2.55 3.34 2.54 4 2.60 3.12 2.95 3 2.18 3.64 2.64 4 2.08 3.09 2.80 17 2.80 . . . 2.62 18 2.38 2.42 19 2.58 2.68 22 2.53 2.32 23 2.41 2.42 6 2.69 3.18 2.78 7 2.52 2.97 3.07 8 2.92 3.11 2.88 9 3.37 2.99 2.80 10 2.30 3.15 2.35 9 2.87 4.91 2.78 10 2.64 2.60 2.74 13 2.25 2.64 2.51 14 2.33 2.65 2.64 15 2.44 3.03 2.84 39 2.66 2.73 2.89 38 2.36 2.48 3.09 30 2.43 3.85 2.69 34 2.56 3.43 3.45 41 2.34 2.91 3.49 3 2.33 2.88 2.61 4 2.24 3.02 3.10 3 5.52 2.47 2.78 4 2.28 3.48 2.74 7 2.21 2.66 2.49 8 4.09 2.66 2.62 9 2.74 3.32 2.71 10 2.55 3.31 3.19 11 2.38 6.55 3.62 12 2.77 2.84 2.73 15 4.52 3.00 3.19 16 5.85 3.21 2.29 3 2.56 2.89 2.43 4 6.17. 2.40 2.97 20 2.35 2.50 2.43 23 2.38 2.84 2.S3 3 2.45 2.84 2.78 4 3.22 2.98 2.84 3 2.35 2.83 3.05 4 2.15 2.48 5.55 3 2.46 2.48 2.78 4 2.12 2.51 2.90 1 2.30 4.96 2.63 2 2.25 2.83 Lost 28 2.95 3.02 2.94 39 2.25 2.75 2.S6 *Indicates Special Can 188 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued W-2-G Age Article Month: Michigan Apples . 3*/> New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans . 6 Cider , 3^ Clam Juice 4^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3>y 2 Michigan Pumpkin 3^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes §y 2 New Jersey Tomatoes h J / 2 Salmon . . . 3 Tuna Fish 5 an No. 3 , — Pot Body 2.62 mds per Base Top 2.58 Box v Bottom 2.81 4 2.53 3.68 2.43 12 4.55 2.43 2.98 20 2.29 2.80 2.09 23 2.91 4.14 3.3? 24 2.44 3.89 3.12 "42 2.49 2.68 3.09 43 2.85 2.70 2.73 44 3.10 2.50 2.39 3 2.59 2.52 2.81 4 2.71 3.39 2.77 3 2.05 4.23 3.15 4 2.09 2.73 2.98 17 2.79 2.36 18 5.35 3.75 19 2.55 ... 2.43 22 4.58 2.02 23 2.85 2.53 6 2.56 3.04 2.77 7 3.52 3.00 3.16 8 2.58 2.55 5.41 9 3.57 2.87 3.37 10 3.49 2.95 2.70 34 3.05 6.02 2.64 37 3.63 2.51 4.18 38 2.90 3.90 2.76 41 3.17 3.10 2.86 45 2.23 2.50 2.67 15 2.48 3.42 3.42 16 2.46 4.86 2.82 17 1.83 3.09 3.50 18 2.54 3.19 2.83 19 3.19 3.19 2.90 3 3.36 2.77 2.66 4 2.21 2.84 3.43 3 2.78 2.87 2.60 4 2.74 3.30 2.52 7 2.62 3.43 3.44 8 2.63 3.14 2.64 9 2.58 3.01 3.30 10 2.63 2.69 2.65 11 2.60 4.63 3.19 12 2.22 2.79 3.10 18 4.32 3.03 2.73 21 2.28 2.53 2.55 3 2.08 3.75 3.21 4 2.39 2.44 2.64 20 2.43 2.58 2.88 23 2.85 2.56 2.73 3 2.68 2.58 2.93 4 3.50 3.12 2.93 3 3.13 3.75 4.91 4 2.45 4.28 3.20 3 2.45 2.45 2.70 4 2.93 3.23 3.00 1 2.55 4.60 2.69 2 5.24 2.61 4.18 3 4.71 2.79 2.60 4 2.72 2.92 2.56 *Indicates Special Can APPENDIX F 189 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-l-G Age Article Month; Michigan Apples 3yi New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider 3^ Clam Juice 4^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4J/2 Maine Corn (Side) 4J/ 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 2>y 2 Michigan Pumpkin 3^2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5 1 /, New Jersey Tomatoes 5^ Salmon " 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Pour ds per Base Box > an No. Body Top Bottom 3 2.53 2.62 4.78 4 2.24 3.03 2.87 9 2.71 3.27 3.64 12 2.54 2.64 2.48 23 2.23 2.91 3.10 24 2.29 3.09 2.42 ^47 2.58 2.95 2.70 43 2.74 3.35 2.60 44 2.66 2.73 3.02 3 2.46 2.55 3.01 4 2.74 3.22 2.93 3 1.98 2.90 3.72 4 2.29 2.98 3.19 17 2.92 2.05 18 hi . UU 3.05 20 2.42 2.93 21 2.72 2.53 24 2.58. 1.98 6 3.88 2.38 2.66 7 2.64 3.38 2.54 8 2.37 3.09 2.70 9 2.23 2.67 2.93 10 2.84 2.86 3.25 33 4.97 2.67 2.83 34 3.31 3.34 3.28 35 3.04 2.51 3.30 37 2.39 3.13 2.96 38 2.83 3.56 2.98 12 2.00 2.69 3.05 16 2.86 3.36 2.69 17 5.57 3.91 2.76 18 2.22 3.57 2.69 21 2.12 3.05 2.67 3 2.62 2.91 2.72 4 2.14 2.84 2.49 3 6.75 3.48 2.95 4 2.43 2.55 2.55 7 2.03 2,81 3.20 8 2.49 3.14 3.05 9 3.33 2.87 3.00 10 2.57 2.65 6.74 11 2.36 3.47 3.03 12 2.69 3.16 2.79 23 2.08 3.06 2.35 24 2.00 2.58 2.63 3 2.80 2.74 2.32 4 2.09 2.86 2.50 21 2.41 2.38 3.61 24 2.32 2.78 2.56 3 4.36 3.00 5.54 4 2.30 2.96 2.48 3 2.24 2.95 3.20 4 2.40 3.12 4.53 3 2.32 2.88 3.34 4 2.35 2.73 3.00 1 2.35 3.14 4.96 2 5.38 5.28 2.81 3 1.92 3.27 3.08 4 2.44 3.18 3.10 *Indicates Special Can 190 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued X-3-G Agre Article Months Michigan Apples 2> x / 2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider : Sy 2 Clam Juice 4J^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) ^/ 2 Maine Corn (Side) ^/ 2 Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3-^ Michigan Pumpkin 3^2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5j4 New Jersey Tomatoes ^]/ 2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Pounds per Base Box ^ Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 2.72 2.55 2.48 4 5.78 3.65 2.69 10 2.55 2.42 2.47 13 2.48 2.53 3.18 17 2.53 2.73 2.83 18 2.58 4.96 5.58 22 2.58 2.45 3.45 23 2.02 2.63 2.93 3 2.06 2.92 2.59 4 2.02 2.66 3.41 3 1.95 2.55 2.51 4 5.25 2.83 2.63 12 2.84 2.95 16 2.60 ... 2.62 17 4.95 2,35 18 2.52 2.68 23 2.38 2.38 6 2.44 2.86 5.03 7 2.20 3.15 5.53 8 3.66 3.23 2.82 9 2.58 2.96 4.39 10 3.27 3.09 2.78 33 2.66 3.02 2.61 34 2.13 3.47 3.51 35 1.90 3.46 3.17 38 2.47 3.05 2.98 39 2.49 3.15 3.44 9 2.43 2.88 3.12 16 1.89 3.34 2.96 17 3.78 2.61 2.68 18 2.66 3.13 3.20 19 5.27 3.28 2.96 3 3.21 2.88 2.99 4 2.27 3.49 3.16 3 2.00 4.78 2.63 4 2.54 2.83 2.88 7 2.73 3.83 2.65 8 2.27 2.63 3.12 9 4.12 2.99 2.96 10 2.88 2.51 3.15 11 2.25 2.50 2.94 12 2.48 2.67 2.94 17 3.72 2.49 2,87 22 2.18 2.81 3.25 3 4.55 2.89 5.29 4 2.89 2.60 2.68 18 .3.06 3.20 .2.72 21 2.06 2.84 3.42 3 4.-73 3.34 2.89 4 2.30 2.68 2.63 3 2.38 2.96 2.58 4 2.42 3.08 2.98 3 2.10 3.08 2.53 4 2.34 3.28 2.90 1 .2.54 2.98 Lost 2 2.35 3.10 3.06 3 1.87 3.18 3.27 4 2.64 2.82 3.19 APPENDIX F 191 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-l-G Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3JX New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans , 6 Cider , sy 2 Clam Juice 4^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4^ Maine Corn (Side) i 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3^ Michigan Pumpkin 3J^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes ... 5 Maryland Tomatoes 5^ New Jersey Tomatoes 5*^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 Can No. 3 , Pounds per Base Body Top 5.73 3.58 Box v Bottom 2.83 4 4.86 2.96 2.55 13 5.34 2.69 2.86 14 2.80 2.68 2.44 1 2.44 2.80 2.90 2 2.38 2.89 2.48 42 5.05 2,87 3.10 45 2.45 2.48 2.88 3 2.87 2.95 2.51 4 2.90 2.48 3.00 3 2.07 2.53 3.08 4 2.35 3.49 2.83 18 3.10 3.47 19 5.83 2.54 20 2.68 3.63 22 4.60 3.34 23 2.53 2.32 6 2.51 2.66 2.97 7 2.92 2.50 2.83 8 2.26 2.62 3.00 9 2.48 2.50 2.91 10 6.00 2.59 3.12 33 2.25 2.54 2.61 34 2.16 3.02 2.95 35 2.47 2.58 3.36 37 2.36 3.08 2.89 39 2.06 2.68 2.62 9 2.53 2.50 2.63 13 2.65 2.94 3.51 14 2.68 2.70 3.03 17 3.35 2.64 2.98 20 6.20 2.94 2.53 3 3.81 3.06 2.51 4 2.45 3.62 2.70 3 3.04 3.24 2.96 4 2.85 2.48 2.9S 7 3.00 2.76 2.72 8 2.61 3.04 2.39 9 2.72 2.66 2.51 10 2.53 2.73 2.47 11 2.24 2.84 2.80 12 2.49 2.58 2.79 20 2.18 2.62 2.66 21 2.05 2.54 2.52 3 1.96 2,38 2.61 4 2.09 2.61 2.39 13 3.80 3.34 2.53 16 2.72 3.04 2.87 3 2.40 2.77 3.12 4 2.35 3.18 2.58 3 2.50 2.98 2.68 4 2.62 2.56 2.82 3 2.23 2,54 2.88 4 4.10 3.18 2.79 1 2.62 2.66 3.28 2 2.83 2.55 2.58 3 2.46 3.68 2.54 4 2.79 2.49 2.87 192 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Y-4-G Age Article Months Michigan Apples 3J4 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider Sy 2 Clam Juice 4^ Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4J^ Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Illinois Pumpkin 3J^ Michigan Pumpkin ?>y 2 New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland T-omatoes h J / 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 5^ Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 , Pounds per Base Box \ Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 4.58 3.34 3.21 4 2.57 3.52 ' 2.87 19 2.34 2.63 2.74 24 4.24 3.76 2.56 3 2.51 3.33 4.66 4 2.39 2.42 2.62 45 2.14 2.79 2.59 46 2.72 2.72 2.51 3 4.13 2.64 5.70 4 2.79 3.33 3.31 3 4.20 2.95 . . . 4 3.70 2.94 3.06 15 2.55 ... 2.81 17 2.86 ... 2.24 18 4.60 ... 2.69 20 5.60 2.88 21 2.63 2.32 6 2.54 2.92 2.96 7 4.08 4.87 2.54 8 3.10 3.00 3.35 9 2.61 2.96 2.72 10 2.57 2.72 2.89 33 2.55 2.78 2.98 34 2.45 3.42 4.19 37 2.84 3.75 3.68 38 2.54 2.77 2,74 39 2.75 3.14 2.82 15 4.58 2.80 3.40 16 2.55 3.00 3.03 17 2.60 3.00 2.93 21 2.69 2.71 2.38 22 2.27 3.49 2.79 3 2.13 3.58 3.30 4 3.28 3.15 2.82 3 3.83 2.98 2.78 4 2.24 2.58 2.68 7 3.82 .2.55 2.94 8 2.51 2.81 2.93 9 3.69 3.15 2.94 10 5.10 3.15 3.25 11 2.59 3.82 3.32 12 2.53 2.55 • o.oo 18 2.35 2.27 6.68 19 2.12 2.68 3.22 3 4.51 3.30 3.35 4 2.64 2,98 3.30 19 2.78 2.55 2.53 20 2.54 2.48 3.05 ■ 3 3.20 2.78 3.28 4 2.82 2.72 3.29 3 2,48 2.63 3.15 4 2.18 3.35 2.98 3 2.82 2.50 2.97 4 2.54 2,85 2.83 1 4.26 3.23 2.60 2 4.65 2.76 2.78 3 2.30 2.82 2.57 4 2.60 2.43 2.66 APPENDIX F 193 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Z-l-G Age Article Months Michigan Apples 33/2 New York Apples 4 Pennsylvania Apples 4 String Beans 6 Cider Sy 2 Clam Juice 4^2 Illinois Corn 5 Indiana Corn 5 Maine Corn (End) 4>4 Maine Corn (Side) 4^ Condensed Milk 7 Evaporated Milk 7 Peas 7 Pounds per Base Box Illinois Pumpkin 3*/2 Michigan Pumpkin 3J^ New York Pumpkin 4 Indiana Tomatoes 5 Maryland Tomatoes h]/ 2 New Jersey Tomatoes h J /2 Salmon 3 Tuna Fish 5 Can No. Body Top Bottom 3 2.35 2.58 2.70 4 2.40 2.95 5.13 21 2.79 5.50 3.79 24 2.28 2.63 4.55 3 2.47 3.26 2.44 6 2.54 2.78 3.11 43 2.25 2,58 2.17 3 2.27 3.81 2.37 4 3.14 2.77 2.98 3 2.40 5.15 2.63 4 2.74 2.97 3.19 17 2.96 . . • 2.45 18 6.10 ... 2.40 19 3.03 2.58 20 2.55 2.96 23 2.36 2.21- 6 2.37 . 3.06 2.72 7 2.42 2.65 3.32 8 3.78 ' 2.71 2.66 9 1.55 10 2.68 2.75 2.95 33 2.49 2.48 3.23 34 2.69 2.77 2.58 35 2.31 2.79 2.77 37 3.00 2.71 2.61 39 3.04 2.89 3.58 11 2.74 4.58 3.53 15 3.12 2.76 3.08 19 2.54 2.44' 2.98 20 3.19 3.04 3.60 24 2.69 3.06 2.56 3 2.54 3.06 3.07 4 2.31 3.03 2.79 3 2,43 2.98 2.59 4 2.93 2.83 2,72 7 2.58 2,67 2.95 8 2.57 2.97 2.91 9 2.77 2.77 2.79 10 2.65 . 2.95 5.40 11 4.13 2.38 2.71 12 2.79 2.37 2.43 19 2.61 2.55 2.46 20 2.72 2.38 3.74 3 2.60 2.66 2.60 4 2.59 2.55 2.51 18 2.50 2,72 4.85 19 3.73 3.93 2.85 3 2.35 2.36 2.73 4 2.41 2.85 2.66 3 4,65 2.98 2.63 4 2.35 2.62 3.02 3 2.60 2.65 2.57 4 2.63 4.70 3.44 1 3.33 2.72 4.42 2 2.55 3.15 3.69 3 2.79 4.56 2.96 4 3.20 5.52 2.84 194 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 W-l-A Age , Pounds per Base Box „ Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 5^ 5 .59 .79 .69 6 .76 . .78 .74 New York Apples 6 17 .73 .76 .70 20 .59 .80 .6G Pennsylvania Apples 6 16 .88 .89 .38 17 .68 .75 .83 String Beans 8 33 .55 .85 .72 34 .68 .70 .75 Cider 5 J / 2 5 .78 .85 .71 6 .80 .80 .76 Clam Juice 6*/ 2 5 .80 1.06 1.25 6 .88 .91 1.02 Evaporated Milk 9 5 .91 .78 .75 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ 17 .65 .80 .83 18 .85 .79 .65 Michigan Pumpkin 5^ 5 .75 .93 .80 6 .76 .70 .77 New York Pumpkin 6 13 .76 .91 .93 14 .90 .70 .72 Indiana Tomatoes 7 . 5 .75 .71 .77 6 .76 .73 .84 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ 5 .86 1.04 .90 6 .96 .82 .93 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ 5 .80 .77 .69 6 .78 .89 .67 W-2-A Michigan Apples 5>4 5 .73 .65 .70 6 .64 .81 .83 New York Apples 6 5 .68 .81 .84 11 .63 .73 .57 Pennsylvania Apples 6 6 .75 .88 .82 7 .75 .87 .76 String Beans 8 25 .64 .69 .87 26 .64 .73 .71 Cider V/ 2 5 .62 .77 .92 6 .78 .80 .93 Clam Juice 6^ 5 .75 .69 .79 6 .78 .85 .87 Evaporated Milk 9 5 .66 .69 .83 Illinois Pumpkin 5 l / 2 17 .54 .80 .75 18 .68 .78 .65 Michigan Pumpkin 5^ 5 .63 .77 .84 6 .65 .71 .75 New York Pumpkin 6 14 .73 .98 .75 17 .75 .78 .85 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 .74 .78 1.02 6 .79 .76 .87 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ 5 .63 .72 .84 6 .82 .92 .92 New Jersey Tomatoes iy 2 5 .78 .82 .86 6 85 .88 .86 APPENDIX F 195 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued X-l-A Age r — Pounds per Base Box s Article Months Michigan Apples 5J^ New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5^ Clam Juice 6^ Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5J^ Michigan Pumpkin 5^ New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ X-3-A Michigan Apples 5^2 New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5^ Clam Juice §y 2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5 J / 2 Michigan Pumpkin 5^ New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes iy 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ Can No. Body Top Bottom 5 .60 .77 .66 6 .72 .74 .78 11 .62 .56 .59 16 .56 .62 .53 15 .55 .73 .71 18 .65 .72 .70 39 .78 .73 .63 42 .74 .68 .66 5 .61 .82 .75 6 .68 .72 .60 5 .86 .83 89 6 .88 .78 .75 5 .69 .99 .79 15 .66 .65 .6Q 16 .56 .69 .80 5 .69 .81 72 6 .74 ■ .69 .63 13 .59 .72 .72 14 .86 .77 .78 5 .69 .74 .67 6 .68 .77 .69 5 .71 .77 .73 6 .73 .72 .78 5 .77 .75 .80 6 .73 .84 .77 5 .71 .79 .90 6 .81 .98 .62 11 .62 .78 M 17 .68 .65 ,54 17 .80 .82 .82 18 .78 .73 .65 40 .71 .85 .72 41 .69 .82 .87 5 .80 .81 .73 6 .73 .73 .85 5 .83 .81 .83 6 .82 .87 .87 5 .84 .82 .72 17 . .78 .64 .65 18 .63 .60 .70 5 .81 .76 .79 6 .76 .85 .66 14 .74 .65 .65 20 .67 .89 .73 5 .90 .74 .70 6 .84 .73 69 5 .83 .77 .80 6 .97 .78 .90 5 .85 .86 .83 6 .85 .83 .74 196 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Y-l-A Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples h]/ 2 5 6 New York Apples 6 11 23 Pennsylvania Apples 6 17 20 String Beans 8 17 18 Cider ^/ 2 5 6 Clam Juice 6^4 5 6 Evaporated Milk 9 5 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ 13 14 Michigan Pumpkin h]/ 2 5 6 New York Pumpkin 6 6 14 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 6 Maryland Tomatoes 7^2 5 6 New Jersey Tomatoes 1 l / 2 5 6 Y-4-A Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom .80 .73 .82 .74 .71 .80 .67 .65 .72 M .73 .66 .70 .79 .87 .66 .82 .71 .73 .94 .55 .66 .63 .80 .78 .72 .76 .76 .84 .77 .85 .90 .82 .95 .78 .74 .70 .85 .74 .57 .85 .63 .72 .64 .68 .56 .61 .75 .66 .79 .67 .78 .71 .74 .92 1.06 1.00 .86 .75 .83 .74 .63 .67 .81 M .73 .74 .79 .68 .84 .75 .76 .92 .78 .Q6 Michigan Apples b J / 2 New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider o J / 2 Clam Juice 6^ Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin h J / 2 Michigan Pumpkin 5^4 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ New Jersey Tomatoes r t 1 / 2 5 .79 .86 .71 6 .80 .77 83 17 .62 .71 .74 18 .73 .83 .75 13 .74 .74 .96 14 .72 .75 .70 38 .70 .74 .80 39 .73 .77 .84 5 .77 .88 .84 6 .84 .94 .86 5 .88 .85 .89 6 .83 .91 .92 5 .77 .84 .79 17 .80 .93 .65 18 .67 .75 .88 5 .83 .87 .77 6 .74 .84 .91 17 .80 .84 .80 18 .90 .90 .74 5 .87 .87 .88 6 .71 .83 .98 5 .77 .75 .82 6 .78 .92 .75 5 .67 .80 .74 6 .84 .80 .82 APPENDIX F 197 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Z-l-A Age rz — _ Pounds per Base Box „ Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 5^ 5 6 New York Apples 6 14 15 Pennsylvania Apples 6 8 23 String Beans 8 38 39 Cider 5^ 5 6 Clam Juice 6^2 5 6 Evaporated Milk 9 5 Illinois Pumpkin ty* 17 18 Michigan Pumpkin 5^ 5 6 New York Pumpkin 6 17 18 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 6 Maryland Tomatoes 7J^ 5 6 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ 5. . 6 Body Top Bottom .70 .82 .63 .59 .83 .82 .63 .64 .73 .59 .69 .69 .60 .62 .68 .57 .61 .60 .69 .74 .76 .76 .85 .75 .71 .78 .53 .73 .73 .65 .84 .86 .82 .75 .86 .86 .89 .84 .71 .73 .68 .67 .86 .66 .62 .60 .75 .81 .77 .76 .73 .72 .75 .80 .70 .69 .71 .68 .91 .83 .76 .88 .75 .72 .76 .79 .73 .71 .71 .69 .91 .90 .70 .82 .76 198 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued W-l-B Age , — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Michigan Apples by 2 New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans ,8 Cider 5*/ 2 Clam Juice 6 T / 2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ Michigan Pumpkin hyi New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ W-2-B Michigan Apples §y 2 New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider *. ' 5^ Clam Juice % l / 2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin h x / 2 Michigan Pumpkin 5J^ New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^4 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ Can No. Body Top Bottom .72 .92 .74 6 .73 .98 .99 10 .92 1.00 .77 11 .73 1.03 .87 5 .91 1.01 .84 6 .88 .95 .98 37 .95 .97 .90 39 .86 .95 .80 5 .70 1.07 1.00 6 .99 .96 .95 5 1.04 .91 .92 6 .98 1.18 .96 6 .88 .98 .92 17 .78 .97 .76 18 .77 .82 .80 5 .92 .90 .81 6 .87 .96 1.28 16 .90 .93 1.11 17 .96 1.19 .90 5 .87 .97 1.13 6 .96 1.06 .90 5 .98 1.04 1.00 6 1.01 .89 .78 5 1.00 .89 1.00 6 1.09 1.04 .96 5 .79 .97 .90 6 .96 .93 1.05 8 .80 .88 .95 9 .86 .95 .92 18 .67 1.04 .35 19 .86 1.15 .93 37 .73 1.05 .93 38 .70 .92 1.07 1.01 .85 1.05 6 1.05 .97 .80 5 1.09 1.12 1.02 6 1.06 1.09 1.29 5 .89 .88 .79 18 .80 .60 .80 19 .74 .71 .66 5 .84 .78 1.09 6 .95 .92 .99 11 .83 1.13 .96 17 .82 .85 1.00 5 1.06 .93 1.02 6 .78 1.04 .92 5 .90 1.16 .92 6 1.11 .91 1.03 5 1.16 .93 1.05 6 .98 .90 .96 APPENDIX F 199 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued X-l-B Age ^ — Pounds per Base Box s Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples hy 2 5 6 New York Apples 6 8 14 Pennsylvania Apples 6 13 14 String Beans 8 37 38 Cider 5^ 5 6 Clam Juice §y 2 5 6 Evaporated Milk 9 5 Illinois Pumpkin by 2 17 18 Michigan Pumpkin 5^2 5 6 New York Pumpkin 6 13 17 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 6 Maryland Tomatoes ly 5 6 New Jersey Tomatoes iy 2 5 6 Body Top Bottom .89 .85 1.15 .82 1.14 .96 .78 Lost .76 .84 .94 .82 .67 .88 .98 .80 1.00 87 .65 .94 .97 .70 1.05 1.10 1.06 .83 .81 .99 .98 1.04 .98 1.02 1.02 1.06 1.14 1.28 .93 1.15 90 1.04 .86 1.04 .89 .65 .89 .83 .93 .98 .75 ■ 1.21 1.04 1.06 .87 .88 1.08 1.04 .90 .93 1.07 1.06 1.11 1.05 1.10 1.11 .96 1.05 .89 .94 92 .82 .96 .9S .88 .93 .93 X-3-B Michigan Apples by New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples «... 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5^ Clam Juice 6y Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin by 2 Michigan Pumpkin by 2 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes ly, New Jersey Tomatoes iy 2 5 .95 1.27 .87 6 .98 1.21 1.07 8 .78 1.13 .96 16 .83 1.05 .99 14 .97 .91 .86 16 .78 1.14 1.05 42 1.03 1.01 .96 43 .90 1.07 1.07 5 1.04 1.14 1.02 6 1.08 1.10 1.02 5 1.04 1.19 1.17 6 1.10 1.03 1.37 5 .86 1.22 1.07 15 .79 1.20 .88 16 .88 .90 1.07 5 .90 .86 1.16 6 .85 .87 1.12 14 1.09 1.12 1.03 17 .90 1.08 1.05 5 .97 .90 1.17 6 .74 1.12 1.12 5 1.00 1.01 1.06 6 1.03 1.01 .98 5 1.03 .91 1.01 6 1.01 .99 1.01 200 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Y-l-B Age , — Pounds per Base Box x Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 5^ 5 .90 .97 1.14 6 1.11 1.03 1.00 New York Apples 6 5 .63 .89 .86 6 .85 .92 .80 Pennsylvania Apples 6 17 .83 .93 .87 19 .90 88 .82 String Beans 8 37 .92 .97 1.23 38 .92 .96 83 Cider 5 l / 2 5 1.02 .98 1.08 6 1.14 1.20 1.08 Clam Juice 6^ 5 1.00 1.37 1.01 6 . 1.08 .86 .94 Evaporated Milk 9 5 1.04 1.23 .95 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ 17 .85 1.11 .95 18 .63 .94 .88 Michigan Pumpkin ' h]/ 2 5 .85 1.05 .99 6 .90 1.09 1.19 New York Pumpkin 6 17 1.00 1.21 1.08 18 .89 1.17 .97 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 .95 1.01 1.25 6 .87 1.11 1.12 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ 5 1.07 1.07 1.09 6 .98 .98 .90 New Jersey Tomatoes iy 2 5 .96 1.01 1.37 6 .91 1.10 1.08 Y-4-B Michigan Apples l 5^ 5 .87 1.01 1.13 6 .98 1.09 1.06 New York Apples 6 17 .94 .89 .97 18 .88 1.24 .78 Pennsylvania Apples 6 17 .90 .94 ,95 20 .84 1.05 .95 String Beans 8 13 1.03 .79 .88 14 .95 .85 .85 Cider 5y 2 5 1.02 .95 .86 6 .83 .94 .99 Clam Juice 6^ 5 .89 1.16 1.09 6 .93 1.09 1.19 Evaporated Milk 9 5 .84 1.26 1.02 Illinois Pumpkin 5y 2 13 .70 .75 .84 17 .72 .96 1.00 Michigan Pumpkin 5^ 5 1.01 .96 1.17 6 .94 .95 1.04 New York Pumpkin 6 17 .90 .82 1.02 18 .90 .93 .95 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 1.02 .96 1.01 6 .95 1.08 1.05 Maryland Tomatoes 7 J / 2 5 .87 .95 .80 6 .91 .99 .96 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ 5 .93 1.10 1.01 6 1.01 1.00 .90 APPENDIX F 201 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Z-l-B Age , — Pounds per Base Box — v Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 5^ 5 1.07 .92 1.02 6 .92 " 1.17 .98 New York Apples 6 13 .80 1.15 .97 14 .93 1.15 .98 Pennsylvania Apples 6 16 .86 1.08 .97 17 1.02 1.05 1.19 String Beans 8 39 .90 1.06 .97 40 1.03 1.02 .94 Cider 5 J / 2 5 .70 1.23 .93 6 .99 1.04 .96 Clam Juice 6^ 5 1.04 1.18 1.20 6 1.08 .94 1.02 Evaporated Milk 9 5 .96 .90 .88 Illinois Pumpkin Q l / 2 13 .72 .96 .76 17 .67 .94 .91 Michigan Pumpkin 5y 2 5 .95 1.11 .97 6 1.04 .75 1.05 New York Pumpkin 6 17 1.08 1.13 .86 18 .84 .95 .99 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 .98 1.01 1.06 6 .97 1.03 1.03 Maryland Tomatoes 7*4 5 .83 1.03 1.15 6 1.01 1.00 .97 New Jersey Tomatoes 7 l / 2 5 1.22 1.11 1.02 6 1.01 1.18 .96 202 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued W-l-C Age r — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Michigan Apples - 5J^ New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples , 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5^ Clam Juice 6y> Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin §y 2 Michigan Pumpkin h T / 2 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ New Jersey Tomatoes r ty 2 W-2-C Michigan Apples 5^ New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider sy 2 Clam Juice §y 2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ Michigan Pumpkin o l / 2 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes iy 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 11 y 2 an No. Body Top Bottom 5 1.05 1.14 1.14 6 1.15 1.22 1.03 7 1.00 .94 1.10 8 .97 .93 1.05 17 1.20 1.17 1.24 18 1.16 1.10 1.42 17 1.35 1.12 .84 18 1.27 1.07 1.02 5 1.17 1.24 .97 6 1.11 .96 1.20 5 1.27 1.17 .98 6 1.24 1.29 1.21 5 1.19 1.01 1.11 17 .85 .84 .92 18 1.02 1.01 .87 5 1.08 .95 1.10 6 1.04 1.06 1.27 12 1.04 1.39 .92 14 1.04 1.08 1.08 5 1.15 1.27 1.22 6 1.15 1.30 1.42 5 1.10 1.14 1.97 6 1.06 1.45 1.20 5 1.00 1.20 1.23 6 1.05 1.18 1.43 5 1.01 1.08 1.05 6 1.08 1.27 1.16 20 .88 1.49 1.25 23 .96 1.09 1.11 18 1.00 1.17 1.02 19 1.04 1.34 1.18 37 1.15 1.14 .92 38 .94 1.23 1.28 5 .88 1.00 1.15 6 1.06 1.09 1.25 5 1.13 1.46 1.21 6 1.15 - 1.27 1.18 5 .99 1.12 1.47 17 .88 l.io 1.06 18 .87 .90 .81 5 1.07 1.13 1.30 6 1.10 1.04 1.14 15 1.05 1.25 1.34 17 1.40 1.17 1.20 5 1.07 1.13 1.21 6 .96 1.16 1.20 5 1.11 1.17 1.05 6 1.16 1.06 .82 5 1.01 1.15 1.26 6 1.04 1.15 1.28 APPENDIX F 203 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued X-l-C Age , — Pounds per Base Box v Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 5}4 5 1.15 1.27 1.27 6 1.09 1.29 1.16 New York Apples 6 11 .85 1.27 1.03 15 .89 .95 .99 Pennsylvania Apples 6 18 .95 1.30 1.15 19 .80 1.05 1.05 String Beans 8 37 .80 1.07 1.07 38 .97 1.12 1.20 Cider 5^ 5 1.25 1.02 1.22 6 1.10 1.10 1.14 Clam Juice 6^ 5 1.25 1.22 1.28 6 1.39 1.25 1.38 Evaporated Milk 9 5 .95 1.20 1.16 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ 17 1.00 .99 .83 18 .90 1.05 .91 Michigan Pumpkin 5^ 5 1.16 1.06 1.09 6 1.01 1.02 1.16 New York Pumpkin 6 14 .96 1.21 1.32 18 1.01 1.30 1.25 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 1.11 1.26 1.09 6 1.22 1.13 1.12 Maryland Tomatoes 7>4 5 1.05 1.13 1.30 6 1.12 1.17 1.01 New Jersey Tomatoes 7*/ 2 ■ 5 1.17 1.13 1.14 6 1.35 1.15 1.25 X-3-C Michigan Apples 5^ 5 1.07 1.10 1.30 6 .99 1.17 1.46 New York Apples 6 8 .88 1.10 1.46 11 .88 1.23 1.41 Pennsylvania Apples 6 17 1.25 1.09 1.25 18 .94 1.25 1.27 String Beans 8 41 1.36 1.17 1.42 42 .92 1.09 1.13 Cider 5^ 5 1.14 1.34 1.28 6 1.09 1.25 1.27 Clam Juice 6^ 5 1.33 1.38 1.51 6 1.26 1.41 1.40 Evaporated Milk 9 5 1.35 1.35 1.17 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ 17 .90 1.05 .85 18 .88 .92 .86 Michigan Pumpkin 5 J / 2 5 1.06 1.20 1.26 6 .95 1.19 .98 New York Pumpkin 6 17 .85 1.30 1.46 23 .93 1.14 1.26 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 1.12 1.26 1.38 : 6 1.23 1.23 1.25 Maryland Tomatoes - 7^ 5 .86 1.37 1.67 6 1.06 1.23 1.16 New Jersey Tomatoes 7 J / 2 5 .94 1.40 1.45 6 1.11 1.20 1.11 204 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Y-l-C Age Article Months Can No. Body Michigan Apples 5 l / 2 5 .95 6 .97 New York Apples 6 17 1.03 18 .92 Pennsylvania Apples 6 13 1.09 14 .92 String Beans 8 37 1.21 38 1.0.6 Cider 5}4 5 1.20 6 1.14 Gam Juice §y 2 5 1.20 6 1.11 Evaporated Milk , 9 5 1.30 Illinois Pumpkin 5>4 17 .87 18 .96 Michigan Pumpkin $y 2 5 1.07 6 1.09 New York Pumpkin 6 14 1.07 18 .88 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 1.29 6 1.06 Maryland Tomatoes iy 2 5 .95 6 .97 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ 5 1.33 6 .87 Y-4-C Pounds per Base Box Michigan Apples . by 2 New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5^ Clam Juice : 6^ Evaporated Milk . . . . 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5^2 Michigan Pumpkin 5^ New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ New Jersey Tomatoes 7^2 5 6 17 18 5 6 16 21 5 6 5 6 5 13 17 5 6 17 18 5 6 5 6 5 6 1.24 1.16 .98 1.21 1.19 1.11 1.03 1.16 1.11 1.46 1.45 1.22 1.24 1.00 .98 .99 .94 1.17 1.13 1.22 1.25 1.13 1.20 1.07 1.27 Top 1.39 1.17 1.27 1.04 20 19 ,02 16 .01 .13 .22 .29 .20 .97 .95 1.09 .96 .92 1.13 1.19 .95 1.24 1.06 1.04 1.09 Bottom. 1.34 1.04 .94 1.07 1.33 1.10 1.04 .79 1.21 .96 1.23 1.12 1.18 .97 .67 .97 1.15 1.25 1.20 1.15 .95 1.07 1.19 1.28 1.21 1.29 1.14 1.16 1.14 1.09 1.14 1.08 .96 1.28 1.16 1.21 1.26 1.21 .93 1.10 .96 1.06 1.12 1.22 1.04 1.10 1.03 .90 1.06 1.16 1.05 1.30 1.12 .99 1.23 1.20 1.10 1.0S 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.27 1.02 1.10 .93 1.08 .90 1.23 1.52 1.09 1.16 1.0a 1.08 1.10 1.26 APPENDIX F 205 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Z-l-C Age , — Pounds per Base Box — \ Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 5^ 5 .99 1.23 1.09 6 1.45 1.12 1.20 New York Apples 6 14 1.05 1.12 1.05 18 .88 1.05 1.12 Pennsylvania Apples 6 5 1.20 1.15 1.22 7 1.12 1.13 1.06 String Beans 8 37 1.06 1.03 1.25 38 1.24 1.00 1.30 Cider 5*/ 2 5 1.01 1.21 .95 6 1.05 1.16 1.20 Clam Juice 6^ 5 1.23 1.28 1.16 6 1.24 1.17 1.08 Evaporated Milk 9 5 1.13 1.21 1.32 Illinois Pumpkin 5*/ 2 13 1.11 1.15 .95 17 1.21 1.16 .94 Michigan Pumpkin 5^4 5 1.19 1.30 1.19 6 1.01 1.30 1.13 New York Pumpkin 6 17 .85 1.20 1.16 18 1.33 . 1.26 1.26 Indiana Tomatoes " 5 1.09 1.20 1.32 6 1.34 1.30 1.14 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ 5 1.00 1.32 1.15 6 .96 1.22 1.22 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ 5 1.18 1.20 1.22 6 1.15 1.12 1.03 206 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued W-l-D Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 5^ 5 6 New York Apples 6 17 20 Pennsylvania Apples 6 9 13 String Beans 8 17 19 Cider ^A 5 6 5 6 Evaporated Milk 9 5 Clam Juice 6^ Illinois Pumpkin ^Yi 17 18 Michigan Pumpkin 5*^ 5 6 New York Pumpkin 6 13 14 Indiana Tomatoes 7 • 5 6 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ 5 6 New Jersey Tomatoes 7J^ 5 W-2-D , Pounds per Base Box N Body Top Bottom 1.24 1.50 1.29 1.16 1.54 1.31 1.08 1.35 1.17 1.25 1.29 1.55 1.28 1.15 1.55 1.22 1.46 1.39 1.30 1.31 1.37 1.33 1.35 1.18 1.40 1.26 1.41 1.56 1.34 1.36 1.44 1.41 1.30 1.43 1.53 1.4S 1.48 1.61 1.39 .95 1.45 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.23 1.22 .86 1.39 1.27 1.40 1.17 1.20 1.19 1.57 1.27 1.50 1.46 1.20 1.28 1.62 1.24 1.27 1.45 1.72 1.42 1.32 1.42 1.12 1.37 1.57 1.45 1.38 1.40 1.47 1.16 Michigan Apples 5^ New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider hy 2 Clam Juice '. 6}^ Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5^2 Michigan Pumpkin 5J4 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^2 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^2 5 1.16 1.39 1.50 6 1.16 1.14 1.21 17 1.22 1.34 1.19 22 1.26 1.17 1.40 9 1.23 1.47 1.12 10 1.23 1.30 1.23 37 1.32 1.36 1.30 41 1.35 1.38 1.62 5 1.16 1.37 1.48 6 1.35 1.46 1.54 5 1.49 1.33 1.63 6 1.49 1.58 1.44 5 1.48 1.39 1.39 17 1.14 1.15 1.13 18 1.33 1.21 1.27 5 1.43 1.48 1.62 6 1.50 1.19 1.28 14 1.41 1.14 1.43 17 1.46 1.54 1.15 5 1.16 1.63 1.65 6 1.39 1.41 1.40 5 1.50 1.51 1.26 6 1.22 1.43 1.58 5 1.34 1.18 1.46 6 1.41 1.09 1.59 APPENDIX F 207 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued X-l-D Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 5^ 5 6 New York Apples 6 6 20 Pennsylvania Apples 6 17 18 String Beans 8 37 38 Cider 5y 2 5 6 Clam Juice 6^2 5 6 Evaporated Milk 9 5 Illinois Pumpkin h l / 2 13 17 Michigan Pumpkin §y 2 5 6 New York Pumpkin 6 11 17 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 6 Maryland Tomatoes 7J^ 5 . 6 New Jersey Tomatoes iy 2 5 6 X-3-D Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 1.34 1.42 1.46 1.20 1.63 1.56 1.11 1.32 1 2* 1.37 1.49 1.58 1.05 1.24 1.47 1.06 1.30 1.29 1.13 1.26 1.50 1.17 1.29 1.33 1.20 1.34 1.60 1.30 1.25 1.29 1.40 1.62 1.52 1.38 1.62 1.33 1.41 1.66 1.52 '.97 1.06 1.03 .91 .91 .91 1.32 1.49 1.38 1.40 1.32 1.39 1.11 1.36 1.33 1.40 1.35 1.25 1.16 1.38 1.48 1.46 1.52 1.48 1.26 1.39 1.35 1.33 1.34 1.3? 1.17 1.22 1.30 1.27 1.31 1.52 Michigan Apples oy New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider oy 2 Clam Juice 6j4 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5y Michigan Pumpkin b J / 2 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes Vy New Jersey Tomatoes 7J^ 5 1.53 1.38 1.49 6 1.06 1.25 1.52 8 1.32 1.61 1.40 11 1.15 1.38 1.57 16 1.48 1.52 1.58 20 1.40 1.51 1.62 34 1.25 1.35 1.25 38 1.30 1.43 1.72 5 1.10 1.77 1.35 6 1.15 1.28 1.64 5 1.55 1.60 1.49 6 1.54 1.40 1.51 5 1.62 1.28 1.27 17 1.20 1.12 1.27 19 1.20 1.10 1.12 5 1.34 1.06 1.60 6 1.22 1.30 1.28 13 .97 1.23 1.41 17 1.26 1.33 1.39 5 1.07 1.29 1.85 6 1.43 1.25 1.51 5 1.48 1.05 1.45 6 1.11 1.38 1.41 5 1.47 1.29 1.54 6 1.52 1.43 1.55 208 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Y-l-D Age , Pounds per Base Box N Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 5^ 5 1.46 1.63 1.46 6 1.22 1.30 1.40 New York Apples 6 17 1.23 1.25 1.51 18 1.08 1.27 1.46 Pennsylvania Apples 6 14 1.20 1.58 1.25 15 1.05 1.51 1.70 String Beans 8 37 1.19 1.32 1.12 38 1.21 1.20 1.33 Qder 5/4 5 1.25 1.28 1.52 6 1.30 1.46 1.27 Clam Juice W 5 1.60 1.70 1.33 6 1.49 2.01 1.29 Evaporated Milk 9 5 1.33 1.40 1.38 Illinois Pumpkin • ^A 17 1.18 1.02 1.02 18 1.01 .92 1.04 Michigan Pumpkin tyi 5 1.42 1.17 1.33 6 .99 1.29 1.28 New York Pumpkin 6 17 1.38 1.75 1.42 18 1.38 1.31 1.33 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 1.32 1.40 1.37 6 1.58 1.41 1.48 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ 5 1.28 1.35 1.52 6 1.26 1.21 1.19 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ 5 1.48 1.12 1.41 6 1.30 1.46 .1.30 Y-4-D Michigan Apples 5y 2 5 1.25 1.30 1.22 6 1.22 1.37 1.33 New York Apples 6 14 1.24 1.27 1.46 17 1.37 1.20 1.33 Pennsylvania Apples 6 5 1.50 1.60 1.31 6 1.30 1.31 1.19 String Beans 8 36 1.11 1.25 1.32 37 1.05 1.20 1.25 Cider .*. . . 5^ 5 1.50 1.49 1.32 6 1.29 1.29 1.51 Clam Juice 6J^ 5 1.38 1.25 1.55 6 1.28 1.37 1.32 Evaporated Milk 9 5 1.29 1.33 1.48 Illinois Pumpkin o J / 2 13 .95 1.02 .99 17 1.00 1.18 1.20 Michigan Pumpkin 5y 2 5 1.12 1.28 1.41 6 1.27 1.29 1.14 New York Pumpkin 6 17 1.32 1.26 1.40 18 1.46 1.37 1.41 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 1.38 1.29 1.33 6 1.33 1.24 1.48 Maryland Tomatoes 7 J / 2 5 1.26 1.15 1.24 6 1.55 1.19 1.26 New Jersey Tomatoes 7y 2 5 1.26 1.49 1.46 6 1.13 1.37 1.34 APPENDIX F 209 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Z-l-D Age , Pounds per Base Box Article Months Michigan Apples 5^ New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5y 2 Clam Juice 6^2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin ; 5J^ Michigan Pumpkin 5^ New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7j4 New Jersey Tomatoes 7% Can No. Body Top Bottom 5 1.12 1.40 1.33 6 1.27 1.55 1.51 20 1.29 1.27 1.32 23 1.30 1.30 1.20 6 1.24 1.37 1.37 7 1.30 1.54 1.31 17 1.23 1.52 1.58 18 1.26 1.40 1.23 5 1.19 1.46 1.56 6 1.66 1.33 1.47 5 1.31 1.30 1.41 6 1.44 1.40 1.52 5. 1.35 1.25 1.46 17 1.12 . 1.25 1.00 18 1.37 1.28 1.23 5 1.59 1.28 1.37 6 1.16 1.55 1.39 16 1.23 1.62 1.44 17 1.53 1.59 1.37 5 1.51 1.41 1.55 6 1.38 1.46 1.52 5 1.45 1.50 1.47 6 1.60 1.45 1.49 5 1.26 1.48 1.63 6 1.54 1.50 1.70 210 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued W-l-E Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 5J^ 5 6 New York Apples 6 16 17 Pennsylvania Apples 6 10 12 String Beans 8 37 38 Cider Wt. 5 6 Clam Juice Q J /2 5 6 Evaporated Milk 9 5 Illinois Pumpkin 5^4 17 18 Michigan Pumpkin 5^2 5 6 New York Pumpkin 6 21 24 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 6 Maryland Tomatoes 7f/2 5 6 New Jersey Tomatoes 7J^ 5 6 W-2-E Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 1.66 1.68 1.34 1.39 1.49 1.45 1.40 1.40 1.63 1.58 1.46 1.80 1.44 1.50 1.49 1.42 1.45 1.55 1.28 1.64 1.70 1.65 1.60 1.85 1.57 1.85 1.92 1.79 1.83 1.58 1.76 1.87 1.78 1.71 1.85 1.83 1.68 1.52 1.62 1.50 1.40 1.65 1.46 1.60 1.40 1.43 1.53 1.65 1.64 1.48 1.69 1.40 1.72 1.69 1.49 1.75 1.61 1.79 1.57 1.63 1.88 1.89 1.61 1.99 1.74 1.82 1.79 1.60 1.73 1.51 1.68 1.91 1.63 1.65 1.85 Michigan Apples 5^ New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5y 2 Clam Juice ' 6^ Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5% Michigan Pumpkin 5^ New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^2 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^2 5 1.62 2.02 1.51 6 1.59 1.84 1.28 4 1.57 1.33 1.61 5 1.35 1.49 1.35 10 1.70 1.65 1.48 11 1.55 1.39 1.42 41 1.42 1.84 1.85 43 1.35 2.09 1.85 5 1.80 1.45 1.52 . 6 1.88 1.42 1.92 5 1.65 1.46 1.60 6 1.90 2.03 2.01 5 1.99 1.41 1.67 14 1.68 1.56 1.36 17 1.39 1.98 1.60 5 1.70 1.89 1.61 6 1.51 1.34 1.56 14 2.11 2.00 1.57 17 1.63 1.96 1.72 5 1.41 1.86 1.63 6 1.88 1.93 2.21 5 1.49 1.51 1.99 6 1.85 1.62 1.79 5 1.73 1.45 1.81 6 1.41 2.03 1.95 APPENDIX F 211 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued X-l-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples 5^ New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5^ Clam Juice & J / 2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ Michigan Pumpkin 5J^> New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7*/2 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ X-3-E Michigan Apples * b J / 2 New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider ; 5>4 Clam Juice &y 2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin §y 2 Michigan Pumpkin §y 2 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes ■ *ty 2 New Jersey Tomatoes ^y 2 Can No. 5 , Pounds Body 1.57 per Base Top 1.61 Box , Bottom 1.57 6 1.60 1.68 1.77 14 1.34 1.56 1.64 20 1.51 1.40 1.84 14 1.65 1.93 1.66 18 1.35 1.73 1.74 37 1.53 1.42 1.6a 38 1.67 1.73 1.67 5 1.77 1.65 1.69 6 1.78 1.56 1.98 5 1.73 1.92 1.90 6 1.69 1.80 1.71 5 1.74 1.64 1.76 17 1.42 1.66 1.42 18 1.14 1.31 1.35 5 1.71 1.64 1.64 6 1.67 1.38 1.64 19 1.56 1.69 1.83 20 1.52 . 1.59 1.60 5 1.43 1.69 1.81 6 1.74 1.82 1.69 5 1.35 1.74 1.75 6 1.56 1.53 1.72 5 1.18 1.78 1.48 6 1.63 1.80 1.54 5 1.29 1.65 1.50 6 1.60 1.61 1.64 8 1.40 1.53 1.82 9 2.05 1.48 1.51 19 1.66 1.75 1.68 23 1.74 1.72 1.47 38 1.25 1.35 1.56 39 1.68 1.67 1.45 5 1.61 1.53 1.74 6 2.15 1.62 1.52 5 1.90 1.62 1.56 6 1.63 1.53 1.64 5 2.18 1.79 1.61 17 1.28 1.20 1.15 18 1.44 1.33 1.27 5 1.43 1.41 1.69 6 1.70 1.56 1.45 14 1.34 1.51 1.70 15 1.39 1.47 1.84 5 1.45 1.61 1.80 6 1.23 1.59 1.38 5 1.85 2.16 1.68 6 1.44 1.45 1.72 5 1.57 1.69 1.58 6 1.87 1.62 1.94 212 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916^-Continued Y-l-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples 5J^ New York Apples •' • • 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5>4 Clam Juice . . . .■ 6^2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5 l /i Michigan Pumpkin 5^ New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes ., 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ New Jersey Tomatoes 7^4 Y-4-E Can No. 5 , Pounds Body 1.61 ; per Base Top 1.69 Box s Bottom 1.66 6 1.56 1.65 1.95 17 1.50 1.60 1.64 21 1.54 1.77 1.72 13 1.55 1.90 1.87 14 1.49 1.76 1.88 20 1.61 1.56 1.86 22 1.55 1.77 1.86 5 1.86 1.60 1.61 6 1.87 1.90 1.77 5 1.88 1.86 1.78 6 1.50 1.63 1.74 5 1.35 1.68 1.85 17 1.04 1.39 1.55 18 1.69 1.35 1.46 5 1.60 1.71 1.4S 6 1.47 1.66 1.65 17 2.04 1.65 1.83 18 1.61 1.74 1.78 5 1.77 1.64 1.47 6 1.88 1.75 1.80 5 1.68 1.58 1.55 6 1.61 1.64 1.55 5 1.88 1.84 1.58 6 1.88 1.63 1.58 5 1.51 1.57 1.82 6 1.67 1.68 1.80 14 1.40 1.38 1.56 17 1.76 1.91 1.78 13 1.53 1.66 1.63 15 1.57 1.96 1.58 36 1.76 1.75 1.47 37 1.73 1.51 1.75 5 1.68 1.57 1.69 6 1.84 1.51 1.25 5 1.91 1.87 1.59 6 1.80 1.70 1.70 5 2.11 1.74 1.77 17 1.53 1.25 1.44 18 1.37 1.32 1.72 5 1.35 1.45 1.80 6 1.41 1.66 1.69 17 1.63 1.58 1.53 18 1.45 1.56 1.82 5 1.93 1.75 2.06 6 1.61 1.82 2.19 5 1.63 1.48 1.66 6 1.48 1.51 1.78 5 1.68 1.78 1.66 6 1.58 1.42 1.64 Michigan Apples 5 J / 2 New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5 Clam Juice 6J^ Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ Michigan Pumpkin 5J^ New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^2 New Jersey Tomatoes 7J^ APPENDIX F 213 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Z-l-E Age r _ — Pounds per Base Box s Article Months Michigan Apples 5^ New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider hy 2 Clam Juice 5.^2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ Michigan Pumpkin h]/ 2 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ New Jersey Tomatoes 7J^ Can No. Body Top Bottom 5 1.43 1.72 1.57 6 1.77 1.89 1.68 14 1.47 1.66 1.51 17 1.61 1.68 1.63 4 1.55 1.75 1.64 8 1.49 1.62 1.66 40 1.79 1.68 1.71 41 1.52 1.37 1.41 5 1.43 1.88 1.68 6 1.56' 1.52 1.84 5 1.83 1.71 1.70 6 1.65 2.26 1.71 5 1.77 1.80 2.05 17 1.48 1.55 1.56 19 1.31 1.58 1.68 5 1.42 1.62 1.59 6 1.44 1.59 1.71 17 1.55 1.87 1.71 18 1.37 1.75 1.76 5 1.55 1.75 1.73 6 1.78 1.45 1.64 5 1.80 1.71 1.80 6 1.80 1.74 1.36 5 1.70 1.55 1.84 6 1.52 1.60 1.52 214 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — 'Continued W-l-F Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 5>4 5 6 New York Apples 6 3 11 Pennsylvania Apples 6 13 14 String Beans 8 38 39 Cider 5^ 5 6 Clam Juice 6J^ 5 . 6 Evaporated Milk 9 5 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ 17 18 Michigan Pumpkin 5 J / 2 5 6 New York Pumpkin 6 14 17 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 6 Maryland Tomatoes 7 J / 2 5 6 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ 5 6 W-2-F Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 1.55 1.88 2.29 1.93 1.80 1.94 1.61 2.14 1.88 1.46 2.08 1.51 1.78 1.86 1.94 2.19 1.79 2.12 2.02 1.93 1.62 1.86 1.90 2.28 2.47 2.42 2.25 1.53 2.02 1.92 2.50 1.60 1.81 2.07 1.70 1.77 2.14 2.06 1.76 2.05 1.72 2.03 1.88 1.42 1.80 2.19 1.41 1.78 2.09 1.95 1.83 1.59 2.03 2.24 2.20 1.85 1.85 1.64 1.60 2.38 1.94 1.64 1.58 1.92 1.69 2.77 1.75 1.76 2.51 2.28 2.10 2.13 2.02 1.80 1.66 Michigan Apples h x / 2 New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider ^/ 2 Clam Juice 6^2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin h l / 2 Michigan Pumpkin h]/ 2 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^2 New Jersey Tomatoes 7J^ 5 1.67 1.97 1.75 6 1.79 1.73 1.69 16 1.64 1.90 2.18 22 1.59 2.50 1.63 11 1.53 1.78 2.05 14 1.52 2.15 1.55 37 1.88 1.64 1.58 41 2.25 1.73 2.10 5 1.94 2.20 2.13 6 1.68 2.39 1.61 5 1.88 1.66 2.15 6 1.71 1.59 1.83 5 1.67 2.14 1.69 17 1.87 1.66 1.32 18 . . . 5 2.17 1.52 1.69 6 1.80 1.62 1.76 11 2.02 2.29 1.94 17 1.89 2.50 2.33 5 1.65 1.66 2.06 6 1.71 1.84 2.33 5 2.11 2.46 1.77 6 1.71 2.14 2.07 5 1.80 2.01 2.39 6 2.07 2.24 2.00 APPENDIX F 215 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued X-l-F Pounds per Base Box Age Article Months Can No. Body Top Michigan Apples by 2 5 1.72 1.85 6 1.71 2.10 New York Apples 6 11 1.98 2.06 14 " 1.80 1.81 Pennsylvania Apples 6 17 1.63 1.95 18 1.80 2.08 String Beans 8 39 2.35 1.94 40 2.06 1.76 Cider , 5^ 5 1.75 2.04 6 1.78 2.40 Clam Juice 6j/ 2 5 1.74 2.13 6 1.81 1.83 Evaporated Milk 9 5 1.97 2.33 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ 13 1.16 1.90 17 1.97 1.77 Michigan Pumpkin 5V 2 5 1.85 1.60 6 1.62 1.74 New York Pumpkin 6 17 1.71 1.69 24 2.30 2.12 Indiana Tomatoes 7 ■ 5 2.24 2.46 6 2.10 2.24 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ 5 1.89 2.45 6 2.03 1.90 New Jersey Tomatoes iy 2 5 2.51 2.20 6 2.30 1.84 * X-3-F Michigan Apples 5^ New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5y 2 Clam Juice 0>y 2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin h J / 2 Michigan Pumpkin h J / 2 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes ' 7^2 New Jersey Tomatoes l l / 2 Bottom 2.12 2.04 1.86 1.77 1.85 1.62 1.66 1.61 1.69 1.51 2.13 1.90 2.00 1.60 1.45 1.94 2.49 2.01 1.80 2.12 1.95 1.90 1.81 1.53 1.66 5 1.56 1.72 2.09 6 1.63 1.92 2.13 7 1.43 1.87 2.00 11 2.03 1.98 2.08 17 1.98 1.84 1.57 18 1.62 1.85 1.44 38 1.68 2.15 1.87 39 1.74 1.50 1.83 5 2.05 1.58 1.54 6 2.00 1.84 1.99 5 1.64 1.96 1.59 6 1.73 1.93 2.29 5 2.05 2.04 2.12 17 1.57 1.50 1.66 18 1.77 1.55 1.15 5 1.85 1.60 2.13 6 1.59 1.93 1.62 16 1.83 1.70 1.61 18 1.90 2.00 2.54 5 2.07 1.94 1.91 6 1.99 1.68 2.19 5 1.90 1.90 2.17 6 1.91 2.32 2.75 5 1.55 1.74 1.73 6 1.80 2.00 1.81 216 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Y-l-F Age r — Pounds per Base Box • Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples oy 2 5 6 New York Apples 6 17 18 Pennsylvania Apples 6 5 6 String Beans « 8 37 38 Cider 5^ 5 6 Clam Juice 6^2 5 6 Evaporated Milk 9 5 Illinois Pumpkin 5J^ 17 18 Michigan Pumpkin 5J^ 5 6 New York Pumpkin 6 17 18 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 6 Maryland Tomatoes 7^2 5 6 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ 5 G Body Top Bottom 1.76 1.79 2.12 2.15 1.67 2.26 1.47 1.61 1.63 1.66 1.91 1.88 1.56 1.84 2.07 1.82 1.98 2.22 2.16 1.77 2.12 1.44 2.00 1.89 1.94 2.24 1.87 1.43 1.84 1.92 1.81 1.88 1.95 1.90 2.00 2.07 1.35 2.50 2.55 1.11 1.14 1.92 1.58 1.97 1.62 2.14 1.83 1.92 1.98 1.67 1.95 1.81 1.75 1.93 2.08 1.98 2.04 2.33 2.04 2.24 1.65 2.03 2.43 2.46 2.29 2.04 2.33 2.03 2.09 2.36 1.75 2.18 1.61 2.01 2.03 Y-4-F Michigan Apples b]/ 2 New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5^ Clam Juice Q>y 2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5y Michigan Pumpkin 5 l / 2 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7J-4 New Jersey Tomatoes iy 2 5 2.04 1.68 1.66 6 1.87 1.68 1.83 14 1.69 2.10 1.52 17 1.68 2.12 1.74 17 1.56 1.66 1.98 18 1.85 1.93 1.77 19 1.61 1.84 2.00 38 1.37 1.81 2.13 5 1.85 1.80 1.97 6 2.13 2.23 2.33 5 1.81 2.26 1.86 6 1.70 1.94 1.86 5 2.05 1.86 1.78 13 1.62 1.58 2.45 14 2.18 1.55 1.87 5 1.63 1.91 1.93 6 1.62 1.93 1.92 17 1.77 2.01 1.77 18 1.41 1.86 2.11 5 2.09 2.22 2.18 6 1.80 2.30 1.98 5 1.93 1.87 1.70 6 1.47 1.78 1.96 5 1.72 1.96 2.34 6 1.96 2.12 2.45 APPENDIX F 217 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS-pContinued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Z-l-F Age r — Pounds per Base Box ,, Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 5^2 5 6 New York Apples 6 14 17 Pennsylvania Apples 6 3 A String Beans 8 38 39 Cider 5^ 5 6 Clam Juice 6^2 5 6 Evaporated Milk 9 5 Illinois Pumpkin 5^2 17 18 Michigan Pumpkin 5^ 5 6 New York Pumpkin . .' 6 17 ■" 18 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 6 Maryland Tomatoes 7^2 5 6 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^2 5 6 Body Top Bottom 1.67 1.98 2.15 1.97 1.90 1.95 2.02 2.18 2.07 2.07 1.82 1.88 1.50 1.66 1.70 2.10 1.95 1.82 2.11 1.66 2.31 1.51 1.70 1.70 1.59 1.74 1.89 1.64 2.24 2.34 2.09 2.07 1.92 2.43 2.64 2.14 2.28 1.73 1.75 1.72 1.78 1.67 1.32 1.88 1.46 1.87 2.37 1.76 1.58 1.87 1.80 1.97 2.13 1.93 2.05 2.35 1.99 2.03 2.43 1.88 2.23 2.14 2.30 2.47 2.32 2.08 2.19 1.98 1.93 2.49 2.46 1.85 1.82 2.12 1.96 218 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916— Continued W-l-G Pounds per Base Box Age Article Months Can No. Body Top Michigan Apples 5^ 5 2.42 2.60 6 2.46 2.55 New York Apples 6 5 2.70 3.69 11 2.34 3.88 Pennsylvania Apples 6 12 2.39 2.80 13 2.23 3.07 String Beans 8 16 2.15 2.60 17 .98 4.23 Cider 5^ 5 2.39 2.39 6 2.59 3.28 Clam Juice 6^ 5 2.23 2.73 6 2.62 3.56 Evaporated Milk 9 5 2.87 3.32 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ 17 2.02 2.81 18 2.37 2.73 Michigan Pumpkin 5^ 5 1.91 2.60 6 2.36 2.65 New York Pumpkin 6 13 2.50 2.58 14 2.53 2.95 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 3.00 3.12 6 3.42 2.98 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ 5 2.55 3.07 6 2.67 2.70 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^2 5 3.10 2.65 6 3.40 3.13 W-2-G Michigan Apples 5^ New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider 5^ Clam Juice 6^ Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5}4 Michigan Pumpkin 5^2 New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7}4 New Jersey Tomatoes iy 2 5 6 10 11 17 18 37 38 5 6 5 6 5 13 17 5 6 14 15 5 6 5 6 5 6 2.44 2.82 3.66 2.27 2.52 2.50 2.55 2.58 2.63 2.50 2.40 2.40 4.83 2.07 2.05 3.21 2.80 2.71 2.58 2.46 2.49 2.56 2.55 2.61 3.00 3.54 2.79 2.93 2.53 3.24 3.60 2.68 2.78 2.50 3.10 2.63 2.70 2.82 2.83 3.58 3.24 2.75 3.14 2.80 2.68 4.52 4.85 2.97 2.73 2.70 Bottom 2.92 3.23 2.73 2.80 3.09 3.08 2.23 2.36 2.72 2.47 2.80 3.00 2.89 2.34 5.25 2.68 2.40 2.70 2.65 2,92 2.64 2.63 2,82 2.58 2.50 4.21 4.36 3.25 3.17 3.31 2.35 2.90 2.67 2.63 2.81 2.63 3.03 2.88 2.67 3.90 2.59 2.59 2.81 2.85 2.86 2.83 3.45 2.95 3.00 3.00 APPENDIX F 219 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued X-l-G Age , Pounds per Base Box ^ Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples : o l / 2 5 2.13 3.28 3.13 6 2.08 2.50 4.03 New York Apples 6 14 2.33 2.50 2.50 17 2.54 3.08 2.55 Pennsylvania Apples 6 13 2.10 2.53 2.83 17 2.46 2.95 2.52 String Beans 8 38 1.79 4.30 3.11 39 2.29 3.90 2.40 Cider 5^ 5 3.71 3.02 2.65 6 2.13 2.88 2.72 Clam Juice 6 J / 2 5 2.03 2.73 2.65 6 3.99 3.15 2.70 Evaporated Milk 9 5 3.47 2.65 3.07 Illinois Pumpkin hy 2 17 2.62 2.67 5.25 18 4.08 2.69 2.64 Michigan Pumpkin 5^ 5 3.45 2.26 2.88 6 3.14 2.59 2.40 New York Pumpkin 6 ■ 14 1.90 2.45 2.82 17 3.88 3.26 3.16 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 3.33 2.84 5.50 6 2.43 3.23 2.46 Maryland Tomatoes 5 2.92 3.29 2.94 6 2.55 2.67 2.95 New Jersey Tomatoes «. iy> 5 2.18 2.65 2.74 6 2.20 2.70 3.24 X-3-G Michigan Apples hy 2 New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider hy 2 Clam Juice 6% Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5^2 Michigan Pumpkin 5y New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes 7^4 New Jersey Tomatoes 7~y 5 2.87 3.18 3.03 6 4.34 2.57 3.26 11 2.13 2.95 2.44 14 2.34 2.65 2.47 1 2.67 2.63 2.54 19 2.55 3.04 2.86 7 2.20 2.83 3.08 18 2.50 2.72 3.15 5 3.38 2.61 3.19 6 6.03 2.85 3.31 5 2.37 2.68 3.46 6 2.66 2,82 2.98 5 2.46 5.24 2.96 9 2.62 3.40 2.36 18 2.28 2.76 3.57 5 2.49 2.83 3.11 6 2.03 2.49 4.07 14 4.35 2,30 2.45 15 1.95 2.95 2.61 5 3.72 3.02 3.10 6 2.69 2.78 2.86 5 4.25 3.00 2.69 6 2.42 6.30 3.09 5 3.95 3.54 2.35 6 2.13 2.78 2,77 220 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Y-l-G Age , — Pounds per Base Box , Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 5 l / 2 5 2.60 2.88 2.75 6 2.61 2.76 2.94 New York Apples 6 18 2.37 2.65 3.31 19 2.14 3.03 2.51 Pennsylvania Apples 6 6 2.38 3.47 2.40 7 5.93 ' 2.70 2.65 String Beans 8 38 3.50 2.80 2.90 39 2.72 3.06 2.66 Cider 5^ 5 3.28 2.93 2.61 6 2.35 2.38 2.60 Clam Juice 6^ 5 3.73 3.79 3.16 6 2.36 2.70 3.74 Evaporated Milk 9 5 2.32 3.44 2.59 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ 17 3.33 2.92 2.35 18 2.45 2.66 2.50 Michigan Pumpkin 5^ 5 2.36 2.54 2.75 6 2.20 2.41 2.19 New York Pumpkin 6 17 2.85 2.70 2.60 18 2.28 3.22 3.12 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 3.46 2.24 3.23 6 4.18 3.01 3.44 Maryland Tomatoes 7^ 5 5.50 2.26 2.62 6 2.01 2.90 2.74 New Jersey Tomatoes 7 l / 2 5 2.06 3.04 2.70 6 2.64 3.90 2.15 Y-4-G Michigan Apples hy 2 New York Apples 6 Pennsylvania Apples 6 String Beans 8 Cider by 2 Clam Juice 6^2 Evaporated Milk 9 Illinois Pumpkin 5^4 Michigan Pumpkin 5y New York Pumpkin 6 Indiana Tomatoes 7 Maryland Tomatoes iy 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 7 J^ 5 6 16 17 5 6 13 17 5 6 5 6 5 13 17 5 6 17 18 5 6 5 6 5 6 2.70 2.52 3.86 2.34 2.54 2.49 2.33 2.70 2.60 2.43 2.49 2.32 4.32 2.23 2.71 2.71 1.96 2.98 2.53 2.57 2.86 2.74 2.78 2.51 2.76 2.53 2.63 3.31 2.56 3.32 2.85 3.13 3.20 2.81 3.64 2.80 3.44 2.54 2.33 2.50 3.00 2.98 2.50 2.73 3.48 2.56 3.11 2.80 3.44 5.20 3.32 3.45 2.46 2.78 3.47 2.80 2.51 2.53 2.53 2.88 3.70 3.00 2.66 2.85 2.36 2.53 2.70 3.48 2.80 2.68 2.89 2.50 5.02 2.86 3.02 APPENDIX F 221 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Z-l-G Age f- — Pounds per Base Box > Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples h]/ 2 5 6 New York Apples 6 17 18 Pennsylvania Apples 6 7 8 String Beans 8 37 38 Cider 5y 2 5 6 Clam Juice 6^2 5 6 Evaporated Milk 9 5 Illinois Pumpkin 5^ 17 18 Michigan Pumpkin 5}^ 5 6 New York Pumpkin 6 17 20 Indiana Tomatoes 7 5 6 Maryland Tomatoes 7^2 5 6 New Jersey Tomatoes 7^ 5 6 Body Top Bottom 5.14 2.85 2.75 2.43 2.75 4.33 2.13 2.77 2.28 2.46 2.63 2.49 2.60 2.67 2.60 2.57 3.12 2.59 2.45 2.60 3.40 2.32 2.40 4.10 2.55 2.57 2.61 5.43 2.44 2.45 3.43 2.54 2.76 2.35 2.50 2.83 2.65 2.59 2.36 1.92 2.53 4.09 2.15 2.66 2.03 3.05 2.76 2.82 2.28 2.46 4.29 3.74 2.47 5.22 2.10 5.05 2.68 2.57 2.89 2.68 2.54 3.60 2.47 2.80 3.25 3.30 2.67 2.56 2.53 2.63 2.58 2.56 3.71 2.71 2.25 222 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 W-l-A Age , Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7}4 1 2 New York Apples 8 14 23 Pennsylvania Apples 8 15 19 String Beans 10 28 31 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice Sy 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 19 20 Michigan Pumpkin 7 J / 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 19 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9 J /i 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 2y 2 1 2 Body Top Bottom .74 .71 .77 .87 .77 .83 .78 .88 .73 .71 .82 .76 .70 .85 .79 .79 .86 .76 .76 .83 .77 .70 .74 .68 .60 .75 .70 .52 .61 .63 .96 .80 .86 .90 .83 .95 .97 .82 .80 .80 .78 .83 .86 .76 .75 .80 .73 .86 .84 .94 .75 .81 .86 .72 .78 .84 .97 .78 .82 .85 .84 .74 .76 .79 1.03 .87 .72 .83 .57 .73 .58 .60 .62 .78 .84 .82 .86 .65 .70 .95 .88 .67 .68 .75 .85 .78 .80 .63 .65 .75 .76 .77 .88 .82 .88 .82 .80 .74 .56 .88 .78 .77 APPENDIX F 223 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued W-2-A Age r — Pounds per Base Box , Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7}4 1 2 New York Apples 8 6 9 Pennsylvania Apples 8 2 8 String Beans . . .* 10 35 41 Cider 7y 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8^4 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 ■ 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7]/ 2 19 20 Michigan Pumpkin 7 J / 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 21 23 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9J^ 1 2 Body Top Bottom .84 .70 .85 .71 .75 .78 .73 .69 .72 .62 .86 .63 .79 .83 .96 .49 .89 .79 .69 .79 .74 .64 .64 .71 M .89 .84 .79 .80 .84 .73 .96 .75 .80 .75 .76 .74 .71 .85 .81 .86 .80 .83" .70 .79 .96 .92 .88 .73 .90 .85 1.04 .95 .91 .86 .79 .90 .69 . .87 1.03 .77 .92 .92 .82 .87 .87 .65 .68 .68 .73 .65 .83 .71 .81 .78 .63 .68 .84 .58 .86 .77 .63 .75 .87 .85 .98 .96 .83 .87 .88 .66 .81 .87 .90 .82 .87 .80 .65 .98 .77 .70 1.01 224 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916— Continued X-l-A Age , Pounds per Base Box ■ Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 8 15 Pennsylvania Apples 8 14 16 String Beans 10 37 38 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8J^> 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk . 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7 1 /, 20 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7}i 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 16 21 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 Body Top Bottom .70 .58 .57 .75 .71 .65 .70 .68 .60 .70 .75 .66 .72 .79 .73 .90 .69 .72 .76 .65 .69 .60 .80 .72 .76 .68 .76 .73 .73 .81 .70 .90 .95 .75 1.00 .80 .63 1.02 .79 -.77 .77 .78 .80 .90 .73 .72 .75 .82 .84 .88 .84 .76 .73 .82 M .75 .81 .81 .84 .89 .77 .94 .70 .74 .93 .82 .63 .78 .65 .72 .66 .66 .63 .75 .75 .57 .64 .78 .89 .92 .86 .84 .68 .83 .82 .70 .77 .86 .80 .78 .67 .88 .73 .73 .78 .72 1.67 .83 .80 .75 .70 .72 APPENDIX F 225 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-3-A Age , Pounds per Base Box , Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^2 1 2 New York Apples 8 13 14 Pennsylvania Apples 8 15 16 String Beans 10 38 39 Cider 7>4 7 8 Clam Juice 8j/ 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 • 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin \ iy 2 19 20 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 23 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes dy 2 1 2 Body Top Bottom .75 .88 .93 .63 .88 .69 .70 .65 .75 .70 .76 .69 .72 .83 .89 .90 .65 .72 .68 .70 .66 .70 .68 .81 .91 .83 .73 .96 .70 .71 .90 .73 .74 .85 .75 .78 .80 .76 .82 .86 .86 .88 .77 .82 Lost .88 .80 .75 .76 .82 .84 .73 .84 .87 .72 .73 .85 .82 .88 .87 .95 .76 .89 .93 .87 .91 .72 .62 .72 .60 .66 .73 .65 .85 .81 .71 .78 .65 .55 .68 .73 .85 .55 .55 .80 .83 .72 .94 .81 .82 .90 .73 .80 .82 .80 .81 .78 .63 .70 .82 .70 .75 226 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Gontinued Y-l-A Age ^ — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Michigan Apples iy 2 New York Apples 8 Pennsylvania Apples 8 String Beans 10 Cider 7*/ 2 Clam Juice 8*^ Condensed Milk 11 Evaporated Milk 11 Peas 11 Illinois Pumpkin 7^2 Michigan Pumpkin 7*/2 New York Pumpkin 8 Indiana Tomatoes 9 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ New Jersey Tomatoes § l / 2 an No. Body Top Bottom 1 .63 .90 .80 2 .72 .63 .80 21 .55 .66 .69 22 .67 .70 .57 14 .75 .62 .73 19 .76 .72 .80 31 .80 .68 .66 40 .62 .63 .77 7 .70 .64 .90 8 .63 .66 .68 11 .90 .90 .98 12 .98 .80 .88 7 .92 .90 .93 8 .83 .74 .86 1 .75 .82 .86 2 .76 .76 .82 19 .78 .96 .82 20 1.00 .82 .82 21 .94 .90 .82 22 .85 .84 .89 23 .89 .90 .82 24 .93 .78 .87 20 .87 .66 .67 17 .86 .78 .68 7 .77 .71 .65 8 .65 .64 .71 18 .70 .95 1.00 21 .68 .97 .85 -i -L .87 1.01 .90 2 .86 .87 .91 1 .73 .80 .80 2 .80 1.03 .81 1 .85 .83 .83 2 .70 .85 .88 APPENDIX F 227 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Y-4-A Age r — Pounds per Base Box N Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7y 2 1 2 New York Apples 8 19 20 Pennsylvania Apples 8 15 16 String Beans 10 37 40 Cider 7y 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^2 19 23 Michigan Pumpkin 7j4 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 19 20 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 Body Top Bottom .54 .87 .28 .98 .85 .84 .62 .80 .75 .76 .99 .86 .77 .89 .74 .70 .90 .82 .85 .69 .60 .93 .93 .80 .86 .96 .91 .90 .71 .80 .98 .94 .95 .96 .88 .95 .77 .93 1.00 .83 .83 .91 .80 .90 .95 .88 .77 .73 .87 .86 .88 .76 ' .93 .93 .86 .82 .87 .84 .92 .80 .96 .89 .92 .86 1.01 .75 .80 .83 .73 .82 .87 .70 .78 .65 .68 .63 .59 .75 .83 .88 .73 .90 .86 .83 .87 1.01 1.02 .84 .90 .90 .84 .83 .98 .82 .90 .92 .75 .75 .77 .77 .97 1.00 228 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Z-l-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples 7}/2 New York Apples 8 Pennsylvania Apples 8 String Beans 10 Cider 7>4 Clam Juice 8^2 Condensed Milk 11 Evaporated Milk 11 Peas 11 Pounds per Base Box Illinois Pumpkin l l /z Michigan Pumpkin 7*^> New York Pumpkin 8 Indiana Tomatoes 9 Maryland Tomatoes 9j4 New Jersey Tomatoes 9j4 Can No. Body Top Bottom 1 .66 .68 .78 2 .73 .65 .68 17 .60 .64 .70 20 .53 .67 .66 Missing 34 .67 .69 .73 37 .74 .69 .86 . 7 .72 .84 .74 8 .79 .80 .79 11 .92 .90 1.04 12 .86 .83 .90 7 .75 1.20 1.45 8 .79 .81 .89 1 .84 .75 .82 2 .80 .78 .77 19 .79 .83 .84 20 .91 .87 .84 21 .76 .93 .85 22 .86 .75 .79 23 .79 .78 81 24 .77 .76 .78 19 .72 .60 .58 22 .70 .67 .75 7 .63 .63 .81 8 .65 .73 .75 19 .78 .85 .90 20 .84 .94 .98 ■ 1 .82 .75 .76 2 .73 .83 .78 1 .70 .98 .86 2 .75 .68 .70 1 .78 .72 .95 2 .76 .75 .78 APPENDIX F 229 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued W-l-B Age r — Pounds per Base Box ., Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 73^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 17 24 Pennsylvania Apples 8 7 8 String Beans 10 25 28 Cider ny 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 ^ h/iii 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7 J / 2 20 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7 J / 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 13 18 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9 J /2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^4 1 2 Body Top Bottom .75 1.02 ,92 .86 .96 .85 .83 1.03 .92 .98 .88 .76 .91 1.10 1.03 .94 .91 .93 .70 1.08 .73 1.00 .80 .76 .86 .76 .96 .64 .95 1.06 1.12 1.20 .98 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.01 1.06 1.30 1.04 1.27 1.00 .98 1.05 1.08 .80 1.07 .95 1.04 1.04 .93 .78 .88 1.03 .86 1.18 1.20 .89 .99 .90 .84 1.09 .94 .89 1.08 1.17 .83 1.06 .88 .88 .86 .85 .92 .91 .81 .82 .96 .66 1.84 .80 .80 .92 1.12 1.03 .73 1.14 .92 .80 1.03 1.14 .80 .98 1.09 .78 1.05 1.08 .93 .95 .96 .96 1.08 .92 230 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued W-2-B Age ,-- — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7J^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 4 10 Pennsylvania Apples 8 20 24 String Beans 10 33 40 Cider 7>4 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 23 22 Michigan Pumpkin 7 J / 2 7 8 ' New York Pumpkin 8 20 23 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes %y 2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^2 1 2 Body Top Bottom .83 1.10 .96 1.10 1.16 1.11 .75 1.01 .90 .77 1.11 .93 .73 1.08 1.15 1.06 .96 1.08 .77 .98 .86 .97 .94 .79 1.59 1.15 1.27 1.06 .94 1.15 .95 1.08 1.18 1.00 1.00 .85 .95 1.13 .98 1.03 .96 1.04 1.15 .98 .98 .93 1.04 1.05 1.11 .98 1.13 1.05 .91 1.13 .87 1.17 1.20 1.00 .89 .92 .99 .93 99 1.05 1.09 1.08 .64 .65 .75 .72 .68 .55 .73 .87 .76 .83 .99 .82 .84 .85 .96 .90 .87 .88 1.15 1.03 .98 1.10 .95 1.06 .82 .96 1.04 .97 .93 1.05 .95 .90 .92 .76 .98 1.10 APPENDIX F 231 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-l-B Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 11 16 Pennsylvania Apples 8 18 20 String Beans 10 35 36 Cider iy 2 7 8 Clam Juice Sy 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk* 11 . 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 19 20 Michigan Pumpkin 7^2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 18 19 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9% 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^2 1 2 , Pounds Body .58 i per Base Top .62 Box N Bottom .96 .66 M .92 .71 .62 .96 .85 .90 .89 .79 .80 1.07 .90 1.17 .98 1.04 1.00 .86 1.09 1.09 .92 1.00 .97 1.00 1.07 .89 .96 1.18 1.45 1.16 1.00 1.05 1.00 .92 .87 1.01 .95 1.19 1.18 .86 1.18 .95 1.04 .98 1.32 .98 1.06 .90 1.15 .99 1.20 1.09 1.01 .94 1.04 1.08 1.09 1.05 1.05 1.17 1.12 1.00 1.09 .76 .75 .76 .80 .85 .72 .75 .75 .89 .89 .82 .91 .88 .77 .94 1.12 1.03 .90 .88 1.00 1.23 .86 1.23 1.10 .83 .96 .92 .82 .97 1.18 .95 .85 .97 1.15 .95 1.15 232 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-3-B Age ^ — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7J^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 . 11 14 Pennsylvania Apples 8 17 21 String Beans 10 37 41 Cider 7*/ 2 7 8 Clam Juice sy 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^2 19 20 Michigan Pumpkin 7^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 23 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 2 J / 2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes d T / 2 1 2 Body Top Bottom 1.01 1.11 1.06 1.05 1.03 1.10 .79 .93 .82 .70 1.07 .92 1.0Q 1.26 .99 1.00 .88 1.05 .86 .92 1.13 1.14 1.03 .97 .75 .87 .87 1.01 1.08 1.04 1.03 Lost 1.08 1.10 1.15 .93 .93 .99 1.14 1.12 1.16 1.23 1.02 .77 1.04 1.01 1.12 1.15 1.08 .98 1.36 .76 1.00 1.18 .94 1.12 1.11 .90 1.30 1.14 1.10 1.09 1.08 .99 1.13 1.28 .81 .93 .93 1.05 .75 .88 .85 1.06 1.23 .83 .96 .92 .78 .80 .88 .88 .97 1.03 1.06 1.08 1.10 .88 1.09 1.10 1.30 1.10 1.23 1.08 1.08 1.06 1.15 1.12 1.06 .93 1.04 1.10 APPENDIX F 23: WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Y-l-B Age Article . Months ' Can No. Michigan Apples ^Yz 1 2 New York Apples 8 7 8 Pennsylvania Apples 8 20 22 String Beans 10 33 40 Cider 7*/ 2 7 8 Clam Juice • 8J^ 11 12 Condensed Milk , 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7>4 19 20 Michigan Pumpkin 7^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 22 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes % J / 2 1 2 Pounds per Base Box • Body Top Bottom .90 1.18 1.25 .96 .90 1.15 .72 .96 .72 .53 1.11 .90 .85 .89 .89 .84 .92 .87 .96 1.09 .97 .92 1.00 .89 1.22 1.03 1.13 1.05 .94 1.34 1.00' 1.15 1.25 1.05 1.25 .98 1.12 1.03 1.15 1.36 1.00 1.00 .78 .96 1.08 .98 1.30 1.25 1.09 1.26 1.20 1.27 1.26 1.22 1.09 1.28 1.03 1.12 1.26 1.14 1.21 1.13 1.26 1.18 1.15 .86 .80 1.06 .90 .86 1.05 .91 .88 1.10 .87 .91 .79 .84 1.25 1.18 1.03 1.01 1.02 .92 1.03 .98 1.08 1.03 1.08 .92 1.13 .83 .95 1.20 .96 .67 .93 .38 1.08 .95 1.17 234 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Y-4-B Age ,- — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples lYz 1 2 New York Apples 8 19 20 Pennsylvania Apples 8 14 19 String Beans 10 15 18 Cider iy 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8 T / 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7y 2 19 23 Michigan Pumpkin 7^2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 19 20 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 Body Top Bottom 1.02 .90 1.13 1.01 1.15 Lost .89 .92 .83 .83 .1.03 .93 1.00 .88 .84 .87 .89 .88 .87 .89 .97 .92 .89 .93 .96 1.17 1.16 .85 1.08 1.32 1.36 1.08 1.20 .92 1.12 1.18 1.00 1.02 1.08 .94 .99 .94 .97 .97 .90 1.13 .96 1.20 .97 1.05 .98 .99 .97 .91 1.01 1.03 1.13 .94 1.00 .96 .95 1.14 1.04 1.00 1.23 .99 .72 .80 .75 .65 .92 .90 .72 .87 .85 .78 .82 .87 .91 1.00 1.10 .87 .95 1.06 .82 1.10 1.10 1.18 1.05 .95 .97 1.08 .94 1.03 .98 .92 .86 1.07 1.01 .87 .88 .98 APPENDIX F 235 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Z-l-B Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples iy 2 1 2 New York Apples 8 16 18 Pennsylvania Apples 8 2 6 String Beans 10 20 24 Cider 7y 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8y 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 23 22 Michigan Pumpkin 7y 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 19 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes §y 2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9 J-2 1 2 Body .93 .96 .63 .80 1.01 .97 .96 .96 .95 1.08 1.28 1.15 1.10 1.13 .97 Lost 1.20 1.10 1.10 1.08 .90 1.15 .70 .76 .99 1.06 .93 1.08 1.00 1.03 1.18 1.12- .97 1.15 Pounds per Base Box Top 1.05 1.16 1.05 1.10 .91 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.13 1.04 1.10 Lost 1.02 1.04 1.17 1.05 1.10 1.10 1.28 1.11 .99 1.08 .78 .85 1.04 1.08 .98 1.06 .82 1.10 .96 .93 1.00 .98 Bottom 1.05 1.23 .96 1.11 1.24 1.26 1.12 1.12 1.18 1.08 1.20 1.30 .83 1.00 1.10 1.17 1.06 .94 1.11 1.03 1.08 .94 .98 .65 1.12 .94 1.05 1.34 1.00 .92 1.23 1.05 1.03 1.08 236 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued W-l-C Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7>^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 10 21 Pennsylvania Apples 8 7 20 String Beans 10 29 31 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8y 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7j4 19 21 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 17 23 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 2 J / 2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^2 1 2 Body 1.05 1.10 1.07 1.22 1.16 1.00 .90 1.21 1.12 1.10 1.28 1.23 1.07 1.27 1.27 1.34 1.21 1.41 1.24 1.20 1.14 2.44 .86 .96 1.05 .81 1.00 1.14 1.17 .98 1.17 1.25 1.05 1.20 Pounds per Base Box Top 1.15 1.25 .89 .83 1.01 1.23 1.25 1.23 1.09 1.16 1.15 1.36 1.21 1.05 1.33 1.28 1.17 1.19 1.34 1.08 1.20 1.28 .97 1.12 1.19 .94 .82 1.10 1.33 1.35 1.30 1.33 1.17 1.40 Bottom 1.32 1.20 .92 1.09 1.35 1.11 1.00 .75 1.20 1.30 1.28 1.S7 .98 1.16 1.16 1.20 1.08 4.18 1.18 1.11 .99 1.39 .86 .80 1.00 1.26 1.30 Lost 1.20 1.16 1.34 1.30 1.28 1.28 APPENDIX F 237 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued W-2-C Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7 l /i 1 2 New York Apples 8 14 22 Pennsylvania Apples 8 14 15 String Beans 10 33 40 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas .Ml 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7>4 20 . 23 Michigan Pumpkin 7J^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 20 23 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9% 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9J4 1 2 Body 1.20 .97 1.01 1.05 1.20 1.18 .90 .97 1.10 1.04 1.15 1.20 1.18 1.12 1.16 1.21 1.01 1.09 1.28 1.08 1.16 1.18 .97 .81 .90 1.00 .94 1.17 1.35 1.28 1.07 1.14 .88 .89 Pounds per Base Box Top 1.16 1.09 1.20 1.01 1.09 1.18 1.28 1.03 1.38 1.08 1.32 1.18 1.31 1.21 1.35 1.16 1.23 1.40 1.26 1.03 1.30 1.16 .88 .68 .84 .95 1.08 1.22 1.12 1.00 1.15 1.30 1.33 1.25 Bottom 1.17 1.29 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.18 1.03 1.04 1.36 1.36 1.27 1.23 1.16 1.40 1.23 1.15 1.44 1.18 1.22 1.15 1.36 1.12 .75 .59 1.31 1.30 1.15 1.33 1.17 1.20 1.33 1.57 1.15 1.31 238 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-l-C Age , — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7}4 1 2 New York Apples 8 8 16 Pennsylvania Apples 8 4 20 String Beans 10 33 36 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8y 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 20 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7^2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 20 23 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9J4 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 Body Top Bottom 1.13 1.25 1.35 1.18 1.48 .98 .87 1.09 1.06 1.26 1.12 1.21 .83 1.33 1.31 1.20 1.23 1.15 1.09 1.04 .98 1.15 1.29 1.11 1.08 1.42 1.24 1.20 1.18 1.24 .97 1.37 1.33 1.18 1.45 1.10 1.17 1.33 .96 1.08 1.21 1.13 1.15 1.13 1.18 1.03 1.34 1 27 1.17 1.37 1.31 1.29 1.23 1.23 1.41 1.19 1.32 1.44 1.19 1.32 1.26 1.34 1.28 1.14 1.28 1.29 .78 .82 1.12 .97 .97 1.00 .90 1.05 1.33 1.27 1.29 1.08 1.16 1.18 1.26 1.22 1.28 1.08 1.20 1.08 1.17 1.13 1.23 1.38 .98 1.10 1.24 1.25 1.27 1.08 1.10 1.28 1.17 1.12 1.30 1.58 APPENDIX F 239 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-3-C Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7 l / 3 1 2 New York Apples 8 14 17 Pennsylvania Apples 8 20 21 String Beans 10 37 44 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8# 11 12 Condensed Milk . 11 . 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 22 4 Michigan Pumpkin 7^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 20 22 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9*4 1 2 Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 1.35 1.45 1.38 1.08 1.33 1.34 .96 1.06 1.00 1.01 .91 1.11 .95 1.07 1.38 .89 .87 1.36 1.05 .97 1.30 1.09 1.40 1.09 .93 1.30 1.34 1.15 1.17 1.19 1.13 1.43 1.58 1.08 1.45 1.33 .96 1.33 1.20 1.25 1.43 1.39 1.48 1.06 1.06 1.16 1.63 1.15 1.26 1.13 1.72 1.17 1.54 1.30 1.33 1.44 1.56 1.22 ' 1.32 1.26 1.20 1.22 1.40 1.29 1.59 1.39 .96 .92 1.10 .82 1.10 1.05 1.19 .92 1.06 .97 1.17 1.28 1.15 1.64 1.31 1.08 1.50 1.33 1.28 1.16 1.36 1.22 1.48 1.60 1.10 1.25 1.14 .96 1.20 1.10 .87 1.28 1.06 1.12 1.45 1.16 240 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Y-l-C Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 1}A 1 2 New York Apples 8 19 20 Pennsylvania Apples 8 15 16 String Beans 10 34 35 Cider ?K 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 20 24 Michigan Pumpkin 7^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 18 20 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes < d l / 2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9J^ 1 2 , Pounds per Base Box \ Body Top Bottom .97 1.26 1.15 1.07 1.25 1.20 .96 1.14 .96 .92 1.10 .97 1.21 1.15 1.12 1.17 1.19 1.12 1.02 1.19 .96 1.13 1.15 .93 1.18 1.11 1.13 1.23 1.28 1.00 1.18 1.23 1.25 1.23 1.18 1.21 1.03 1.29 1.20 1.00 1.19 1.27 1.20 1.08 1.17 1.10 1.17 1.23 1.29 1.28 1.13 1.37 1.21 1.00 1.21 1.17 1.12 1.06 1.22 .98 1.36 1.23 1.14 1.15 1.36 1.10 1.15 .98 .93 .88 1.10 1.02 .99 .89 1.09 .95 .91 1.36 .94 .98 .95 .75 1.15 .96 1.10 .97 1.17 1.20 1.25' 1.05 1.20 1.36 1.08 .87 1.13 1.21 1.08 1.17 1.02 1.15 1.23 1.10 APPENDIX F 241 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Y-4-C Age ,-_ — Pounds per Base Box > Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 19 20 Pennsylvania Apples 8 7 10 String Beans , .' 10 23 42 Cider iy 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk Ml 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 19 21 Michigan Pumpkin 7^2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 19 20 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^> 1 2 Body Top Bottom 1.13 1.04 1.34 1.14 1.30 1.22 1.03 1.02 1.03 .93 1.04 .99 1.19 1.16 1.26 1.36 1.31 1.00 1.13 1.10 1.06 .94 1.00 1.06 1.16 1.37 1.11 1.11 1.26 1.27 1.12 1.25 1.15 1.20 1.13 1.31 1.17 1.24 1.13 1.17 1.23 1.22 1.45 .90 1.20 1.31 .98 1.23 1.15 1.15 1.32 1.33 1.14 1.03 1.23 1.19 1.03 1.31 . 1.05 • 1.25 1.09 1.08 1.20 1.19 1.29 1.19 1.05 1.15 .96 1.13 .95 .98 1.00 .94 .92 .98 .86 1.13 .97 1.17 1.18 1.20 1.25 1.53 .98 1.20 1.30 1.07 1.35 1.20 1.26 1.12 1.38 1.30 1.27' 1.18 1.18 1.45 1.25 1.19 1.15 1.24 242 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Z-l-C Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 20 23 Pennsylvania Apples 8 6 11 String Beans 10 23 24 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice Sj/ 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 21 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7^2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 19 22 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9j4 1 2 Body 1.13 1.53 .91 .90 .98 1.06 .80 1.24 1.05 1.30 1.30 1.16 1.39 1.16 1.29 1.13 .97 1.11 1.29 .97 .97 1.09 .73 1.05 .90 1.11 1.08 1.15 1.04 1.08 1.20 1.30 .98 1.20 Pounds per Base Box Top 1.34 1.06 1.01 1.18 1.10 1.14 1.06 1.19 1.22 1.16 1.50 1.63 1.04 1.12 1.28 1.22 1.31 1.85 1.26 1.18 1.29 1.32 .94 1.02 1.00 1.16 Lost 1.33 1.30 1.05 1.20 1.18 1.25 1.12 Bottom 1.08 Lost .96 .89 1.20 1.23 1.19 1.00 1.33 1.29 1.35 1.28 1.13 1.31 1.31 1.40 1.14 1.25 1.26 1.30 1.23 1.22 1.10 .98 1.11 1.24 1.32 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.28 1.18 1.33 1.52 APPENDIX F 243 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued W-l-D Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples iy 2 1 2 New York Apples 8 21 23 Pennsylvania Apples 8 7 16 String Beans 10 7 8 Cider . 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 • 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 20 24 Michigan Pumpkin 7 l / 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 16 17 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9*/2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9 J/2 1 2 Body 1.22 1.26 1.46 1.40 1.25 1.30 1.41 1.10 1.33 1.37 1.22 1.28 1.37 1.40 1.48 1.80 1.51 1.57 1.14 1.81 1.49 1.26 1.09 1.01 .99 1.10 1.30 1.28 1.30 1.35 1.41 1.48 1.23 1.20 Pounds per Base Box Top 1.34 1.37 1.56 1.30 1.17 1.30 1.25 1.30 1.27 1.39 1.47 1.43 1.57 1.43 1.36 1.35 1.64 1.26 1.45 1.36 1.41 1.71 1.20 1.03 .89 1.31 1.30 2.50 1.38 1.23 1.45 1.40 1.37 1.40 Bottom 1.55 1.38 1.26 1.30 1.40 1.22 1.44 1.42 1.37 1.33 1.40 1.52 1.23 1.54 1.38 1.18 1.55 1.24 1.30 1.46 1.43 1.33 .95 1.17 1.13 .85 1.20 1.22 1.32 1.60 1.51 1.44 1.22 1.28 244 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916— Continued W-2-D Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7}4 1 2 New York Apples 8 16 20 Pennsylvania Apples 8 16 18 String Beans 10 38 39 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice Sy 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin iy 2 19 20 Michigan Pumpkin 7*4 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 20 . 23 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9J4 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^2 1 2 Body 1.10 1.21 1.36 1.36 1.42 1.32 1.05 1.02 1.42 1.31 1.32 1.52 1.16 1.16 1.48 1.38 1.21 1.61 1.44 1.29 1.57 1.43 .91 1.30 1.21 1.00 1.30 1.05 1.54 1.58 1.35 1.65 1.30 1.10 Pounds per Base Box Top 1.42 1.56 1.38 1.45 1.40 1.45 1.33 1.30 1.40 1.31 1.47 1.68 1.49 1.31 1.48 1.60 1.32 1.32 1.56 1.23 1.13 1.53 1.18 1.46 1.38 1.30 1.33 1.63 1.45 1.28 1.35 1.42 1.30 1.51 Bottom 1.45 1.20 1.02 1.19 1.65 1.32 1.50 1.03 1.75 1.37 1.62 1.60 1.47 1.39 1.30 1.40 1.62 1.78 1.42 1.42 1.43 1.51 1.03 1.15 1.16 1.29 1.35 1.08 1.32 1.60 1.38 1.36 1.68 1.47 APPENDIX F 245 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-l-D Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7 l / 2 1 2 New York Apples 8 4 14 Pennsylvania Apples 8 8 20 String Beans 10 34 35 Cider 7^ 7 8 Gam Juice 8J4 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 - 7 8 Evaporated Milk ,11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 1 l / 2 20 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7}4 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 23 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 1.30 1.45 1.35 1.32 1.48 1.43 1.14 1.36 1.16 1.09 1.38 1.23 1.34 1.29 1.42 1.26 1.53 1.43 1.30 1.16 1.34 1.45 1.27 1.25 1.31 1.25 1.34 1.37 1.32 1.72 1.83 1.66 1.28 1.23 1.55 1.40 1.17 1.38 1.33 1.28 1.54 1.16 1.18 1.34 1.43 1.13 1.43 1.50 1.44 1.35 1.49 1.22 1.46 1.55 1.26 1.41 1.39 1.38 1.34 1.47 1.26 1.41 1.40 1.37 1.61 1.31 .96 1.16 1.30 1.03 .89 1.05 1.14 1.24 1.37 .97 1.24 1.15 1.38 1.26 1.30 1.22 1.30 1.77 1.25 1.20 1.38 1.35 1.43 1.20 1.33 1.38 1.48 1.16 1.37 1.43 1.30. 1.28 1.40 1.25 1.35 1.60 246 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-3-D Age , Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7>4 1 2 New York Apples 8 14 17 Pennsylvania Apples 8 15 19 String Beans 10 35 36 Cider ^A 7 8 Clam Juice 8J/^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^2 20 21 Michigan Pumpkin 7^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 14 16 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^> 1 2 Body Top Bottom 1.31 1.45 1.35 1.15 1.43 1.42 1.11 1.44 1.45 1.03 1.44 1.28 1.45 1.20 1.40 1.37 1.13 1.36 1.38 1.26 1.48 1.43 1.38 1.17 1.48 1.53 1.24 1.52 1.46 1.56 1.28 1.58 1.45 1.42 1.63 1.03 1.17 1.29 1.27 1.50 1.35 1.32 1.10 1.48 1.35 1.36 1.16 1.51 1.36 1.76 1.30 1.88 1.33 1.91 1.94 1.44 1.42 1.91 1.63 1.80 1.66 1.31 1.31 1.05 1.28 1.03 1.10 1.05 .95 1.03 1.23 1.24 1.30 .88 1.10 1.38 1.72 1.82 1.30 1.46 1.18 1.40 1.66 1.60 1.35 1.26 1.65 1.35 1.42 1.18 1.25 1.35 1.60 1.10 1.35 1.52 1.34 1.50 1.56 APPENDIX F 247 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Y-l-D Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 • 19 20 Pennsylvania Apples 8 7 8 String Beans 10 34 40 Cider ^A 7 8 Clam Juice 4 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 20 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7^2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 13 20 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes d x / 2 1 2 Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 1.23 1.46 1.40 1.35 1.48 1.30 1.17 1.12 1.30 1.13 1.37 1.60 1.58 1.29 1.26 1.22 1.45 1.40 1.31 1.32 1.22 1.38 3.24 1.29 1.71 1.65 3.38 1.49 1.34 1.51 1.27 1.43 1.45 1.73 1.30 1.50 1.45 3.39 1.45 1.33 1.44 1.37 1.56 1.50 1.26 1.35 1 .26 1.32 1.46 1.65 1.34 1.49 1.41 1.20 1.61 1.54 1.46 1.43 1.36 1.27 1.46 1.43 1.31 1.59 1.44 1.57 1.03 .95 1.16 1.45 1.03 1.15 1.21 1.22 1.62 1.13 1.06 1.36 1.53 1.42 1.30 1.35 1.50 1.32 1.50 1.25 1.37 1.30 1.38 1.39 1.30 1.20 1.40 1.45 1.38 1.57 1.20 1.25 1.43 1.36 1.50 1.35 248 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Y-4-D Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 21 23 Pennsylvania Apples 8 7 8 String Beans 10 33 34 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8^2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 19 18 Michigan Pumpkin 7^2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 19 20 Indiana Tomatoes .■ 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 2]/ 2 1 2 Body .88 .88 1.28 1.32 1.31 1.20 1.27 1.12 1.50 1.20 1.38 1.28 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.25 1.40 1.25 1.25 1.32 1.47 1.35 1.06 1.05 1.31 1.30 1.90 1.60 1.42 1.31 1.45 1.16 1.45 1.30 Pounds per Base Box Top 1.20 1.45 1.40 1.21 1.52 1.26 1.54 1.28 1.41 1.44 1.28 1.43 1.34 1.59 1.40 1.40 1.25 1.49 1.46 1.47 1.63 1.15 1.08 .97 1.16 .98 1.26 1.38 1.55 1.40 1.19 1.27 1.43 1.67 Bottom 1.53 1.28 1.09 1.07 1.23 1.30 1.27 1.53 1.20 1.48 1.33 1.50 1.24 1.29 1.85 1.53 1.29 1.29 1.40 1.49 1.20 1.42 1.15 1.30 1.37 1.44 1.55 1.75 1.40 1.46 1.35 1.56 1.38 1.53 APPENDIX F 249 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Z-l-D Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples iy 2 1 2 New York Apples 8 15 18 Pennsylvania Apples 8 15 16 String Beans 10 14 20 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 19 23 Michigan Pumpkin 7J^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 13 22 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^> 1 2 Body 1.20 1.23 1.50 1.22 1.23 1.20 1.42 1.49 1.14 1.26 1.60 1.95 1.53 1.54 1.40 1.33 1.22 1.30 1.64 1.13 1.40 1.48 1.20 1.26 1.33 1.28 1.57 1.54 1.35 1.56 1.42 1.40 1.45 1.58 Pounds per Base Box Top 1.34 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.38 1.29 1.35 1.23 1.77 1.44 1.40 1.54 1.53 1.45 1.55 1.48 1.55 1.64 1.45 1.46 1.47 1.45 .92 1.43 1.29 1.19 1.58 1.70 1.55 1.45 1.48 1.56 1.58 1.46 Bottom 1.33 1.45 1.16 1.25 1.28 1.50 1.23 1.21 1.70 1.55 1.18 1.37 1.39 1.23 1.43 1.55 1.68 1.60 1.42 1.53 1.30 1.50 1.50 1.18 1.23 1.39 1.47 1.60 1.60 1.47 1.48 1.60 1.51 1.60 250 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916— Continued W-l-E Age ^ — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 73^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 18 23 Pennsylvania Apples 8 16 17 String Beans 10 34 36 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8y 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 • . 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 13 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 13 23 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 93^ 1 2 Body Top Bottom 1.38 1.22 1.57 1.58 1.58 1.75 1.65 1.62 1.67 1.45 1.80 1.77 1.65 1.80 1.72 1.74 1.61 1.61 1.50 1.55 1.75 1.48 1.57 1.70 1.56 1.72 1.71 1.50 1.64 1.72 1.48 1.80 1.75 1.78 1.76 1.74 1.85 2.01 1.86 1.37 1.69 1.64 1.77 1.53 1.53 1.80 1.65 1.63 1.85 1.59 1.81 1.67 2.20 1.90 1.54 1.84 1.75 1.43 2.02 1.78 1.37 1.55 1.56 1.77 1.97 1.85 1.45 1.38 1.66 1.35 1.47 1.81 1.44 1.38 1.34 1.61 1.42 1.42 1.51 1.84 1.60 1.82 1.87 1.75 1.65 1.75 1.87 1.61 1.74 2.00 1.50 1.82 1.77 1.87 1.67 1.85 1.45 1.68 1.77 1.59 1.70 1.96 APPENDIX F 251 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued W-2-E Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7*/ 2 1 2 New York Apples 8 8 11 Pennsylvania Apples 8 16 17 String Beans 10 42 44 Cider 7 l / 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8y 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 ' 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7 J / 2 20 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7y 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin : 8 20 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9y 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9y 1 2 Body 1.58 1.48 1.72 1.37 1.70 1.35 1.66 1.89 1.45 1.52 1.67 1.63 1.87 1.70 1.97 1.54 1.53 1.31 1.46 1.64 1.94 1.81 1.58 1.61 1.46 1.60 1.60 1.72 1.60 1.76 1.85 1.95 1.65 1.70 Pounds per Base Box Top 1.35 1.57 1.85 1.56 1.76 1.40 1.28 1.10 2.15 2.05 2.40 1.93 1.54 1.64 1.72 1.95 2.07 1.49 1.88 1.59 1.32 1.37 1.28 1.48 1.11 1.60 1.62 1.72 1.77 1.40 1.57 1.97 2.18 1.28 Bottom 1.58 1.38 1.66 1.18 1.66 1.87 1.18 1.42 1.74 2.12 1.70 1.77 1.69 1.62 1.77 1.66 1.83 2.18 2.02 1.76 2.01 1.51 1.17 1.47 1.88 1.64 2.22 2.08 1.97 1.88 2.08 1.37 1.83 1.97 252 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916— Continued X-l-E Age r—— Pounds per Base Box Article Months, Can No. Michigan Apples 7^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 19 21 Pennsylvania Apples 8 19 22 String Beans 10 36 40 Cider iy 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8V 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 21 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7^2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 23 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 Body Top Bottom 1.23 1.84 1.83 1.39 1.53 1.18 1.50 1.57 1.65 1.50 1.70 1.69 1.57 1.81 1.73 1.54 1.71 1.93 2.15 1.70 2.32 1.82 1.88 1.80 1.47 1.35 1.55 1.40 1.51 1.51 1.82 1.65 1.95 1.91 1.72 1.75 1.74 1.93 1.S5 1.91 1.88 1.72 1.84 . 1.75 1.65 1.88 1.85 2.03 1.89 1.73 1.73 1.88 2.01 1.83 1.67 1.65 1.94 1.58 1.52 1.69 1.62 1.76 1.91 1.64 2.01 2.20 1.36 1.44 1.58 1.30 1.48 1.55 1.46 1.42 1.69 1.47 1.71 1.53 1.53 1.91 1.62 1.43 1.88 1.77 1.68 1.78 1.78 1.66 1.76 1.62 1.43 1.69 1.65 1.47 1.83 2.35 1.65 1.77 1.67 1.61 1.55 1.68 APPENDIX F 253 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-3-E Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples r t 1 / 2 1 2 New York Apples 8 11 13 Pennsylvania Apples 8 14 24 String Beans 10 37 40 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 ' 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7 l / 2 19 20 Michigan Pumpkin 7 J / 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin .- 8 17 20 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 2 T / 2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes % J / 2 1 2 Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 1.58 1.57 1.48 1.70 1.68 1.48 1.65 1.50 1.56 1.63 1.50 1.35 1.73 1.48 1.39 1.56 1.62 1.65 1.71 1.29 1.32 1.52 1.47 1.32 1.52 1.54 1.45 1.77 . 1.22 1.62 1.83 1.78 1.72 1.81 1.78 2.03 1.42 1.67 1.84 1.60 1.67 1.67 1.70 1.43 1.60 2.25 1.54 1.85 2.15 1.80 1.86 1.38 1.67 1.67 1.62 1.73 1.99 1.34 1.72 1.33 1.46 1.61 1.81 1.99 1.78 1.83 1.05 1.33 1.14 1.67 1.52 1.26 1.76 1.26 1.42 1.33 1.53 1.43 1.56 1.95 1.50 1.62 1.73 1.68 1.55 1.72 1.40 1.53 1.46 1.86 1.40 1.40 1.80 1.52 1.66 1.75 Lost 1.54 1.45 1.42 1.52 1.56 254 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916- — Continued Y-l-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples 7^ New York Apples 8 Pennsylvania Apples 8 String Beans 10 Cider 7y 2 Clam Juice 8^ Condensed Milk 11 Evaporated Milk 11 Peas 11 Pounds per Base Box Illinois Pumpkin 7^2 Michigan Pumpkin 7^2 New York Pumpkin 8 Indiana Tomatoes 9 Maryland Tomatoes 9}i New Jersey Tomatoes 9^2 a,n No. Body Top Bottom 1 1.42 2.17 1.90 2 1.52 1.68 1.85 20 1.38 1.81 1.69 24 1.68 1.58 1.49 5 1.53 1.74 1.85 6 1.57 1.53 1.52 38 1.76 1.70 1.41 41 1.64 1.89 1.34 7 2.08 1.69 2.09 8 1.75 1.76 1.74 11 1.57 1.98 1.88 12 1.78 1.65 1.58 7 1.59 1.90 1.70 8 1.85 1.60 1.79 1 1.70 1.35 2.05 2 1.45 1.76 . 1.97 19 1.67 2.09 1.96 20 1.82 1.87 1.62 21 1.67 1.59 2.05 22 1.68 1.97 1.73 23 1.92 1.72 1.76 24 1.85 1.86 1.97 24 1.48 1.47 1.18 19 1.32 1.28 1.48 7 1.32 1.43 „ 1.81 8 1.22 1.46 1.49 19 1.56 1.80 2.00 20 1.75 1.90 1.77 1 1.53 1.66 1.72 2 1.58 1.65 1.58 1 1.77 1.90 1.71 2 2.35 1.94 1.70 1 1.75 1.97 1.63 2 1.80 1.98 1.62 APPENDIX F 255 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Y-4-E Age , Pounds per Base Box N Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 7>£ 1 1.55 1.18 1.72 2 1.67 1.83 1.50 New York Apples 8 20 1.58 1.57 1.49 23 1.53 1.83 1.51 Pennsylvania Apples 8 7 1.45 1.69 1.45 16 1.37 1.63 1.48 String Beans 10 34 1.36 1.60 1.50 35 1.49 1.33 1.59 Cider 7% 7 1.75 1.69 1.79 8 1.62 1.62 1.55 Clam Juice 8^ 11 1.36 1.72 2.00 12 1.62 1.95 1.62 Condensed Milk 11 • 7 1.79 1.82 1.66 8 1.56 1.81 1.83 Evaporated Milk 11 1 1.62 1.79 1.75 2 1.65 1.48 1.76 Peas 11 19 1.53 1.90 1.75 20 1.53 1.71 1.62 21 1.53 1.71 1.96 22 1.83 . 1.90 1.72 23 1.55 1.55 1.97 24 1.66 1.55 1.52 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 19 1.30 1.17 1.70 23 1.46 1.45 1.46 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 7 1.56 1.51 1.65 8 1.42 1.15 1.43 New York Pumpkin 8 . . ... ... ... Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 1.60 1.95 1.66 2 1.65 1.82 1.67 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 1.75 1.70 1.72 2 1.56 1.68 1.68 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^ 1 1.68 1.74 ' 1.85 2 1.87 1.54 1.86 256 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Z-l-E Age , Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples r i l / 2 1 2 New York Apples 8 20 23 Pennsylvania Apples 8 7 23 String Beans 10 17 22 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8*/, 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 23 24 Michigan Pumpkin 7^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 20 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes dy 2 1 2 Body Top Bottom 1.50 1.75 1.65 1.68 1.58 1.48 1.44 1.59 1.46 1.66 1.60 1.62 1.56 1.43 1.64 L37 1.64 1.60 1.50 1.50 1.26 1.52 1.65 1.63 1.81 1.75 1.83 1.68 1.80 1.71 1.78 1.77 1.65 1.88 1.60 1.60 1.62 1.66 1.50 1.61 1.66 1.44 1.55 2.15 1.66 1.81 1.63 1.66 1.80 1.69 1.92 1.67 1.59 1.41 1.45 1.55 1.96 1.50 1.74 1.92 1.76 1.60 1.82 1.50 1.92 1.92 1.58 1.50 1.42 1.40 1.42 1.37 1.67 1.62 1.46 1.53 1.54 1.39 1.77 1.76 1.88 1.90 1.80 1.92 1.53 1.50 1.82 1.65 1.63 1.77 1.85 1.71 2.08 1.89 1.78 1.76 1.77 1.98 1.82 1.55 1.72 2.03 APPENDIX F 257 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued W-l-F Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 7 8 Pennsylvania Apples 8 19 30 String Beans 10 35 37 Cider 7>4 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 - 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7>^ 19 22 Michigan Pumpkin 7^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 20 23 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9j4 1 2 Body 1.67 1.76 1.60 1.46 2.38 1.85 2.09 1.66 1.89 2.03 1.65 2.18 1.77 1.89 1.63 1.97 1.63 1.57 1.90 1.76 2.41 1.90 1.98 2.35 1.88 1.44 1.94 2.40 1.60 2.03 1.90 1.85 2.05 1.75 Pounds per Base Box Top 1.78 1.82 2.31 1.56 2.66 1.85 2.32 1.85 2.55 2.04 2.10 1.93 1.42 2.01 2.56 2.06 1.86 1.68 2.06 1.90 1.92 1.94 1.74 1.75 1.95 1.88 1.96 2.26 1.58 2.06 1.90 2.05 1.86 2.91 Bottom 1.50 2.10 1.88 2.23 2.10 1.57 1.78 2.03 2.25 2.02 1.45 1.87 1.52 1.53 1.75 2.20 1.80 2.07 2.63 1.88 1.78 2.07 1.60 1.78 1.53 1.90 1.88 1.92 2.16 2.32 2.40 2.48 2.30 2.40 258 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — -Continued W-2-F Age , Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7J4 1 2 New York Apples 8 5 11 Pennsylvania Apples 8 18 21 String Beans 10 38 39 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7 J / 2 19 20 Michigan Pumpkin 7^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 23 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9% 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9j4 1 2 Body Top Bottom 1.67 1.26 2.15 1.61 1.52 1.71 2.06 1.81 1.80 2.16 2.24 1.50 2.15 1.71 2.15 2.04 1.84 1.73 1.71 1.66 1.71 1.86 1.53 2.26 2.20 2.23 1.83 1.83 2.33 1.74 1.86 Lost 2.27 2.03 1.85 2.15 2.01 1.63 1.62 1.33 1.62 2.31 2.09 2.13 2.15 2.07 1.98 2.52 /V ,tt & 2.85 2.03 2.57 1.79 2.35 2.20 2.46 2.47 2.20 1.69 2.08 2.06 2.12 1.81 1.73 2.23 1.58 2.08 1.52 1.90 1.61 1.62 1.67 1.69 2.03 1.44 2.18 2.35 1.85 2.07' 2.09 2.15 1.95 2.12 1.90 2.45 1.92 2.00 2.15 1.85 1.95 2.42 2.20 2.25 Lost 1.94 2.15 2.14 1.96 2.14 2.17 1.88 APPENDIX F 259 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-l-F Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples %y 2 1 2 New York Apples 8 13 17 Pennsylvania Apples 8 19 20 String Beans 10 38 41 Cider iy 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7 J / 2 20 18 Michigan Pumpkin iy 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 18 19 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9y 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes § l / 2 1 2 Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 1.44 2.05 1.86 1.85 2.12 2.10 1.78 2.00 1.87 1.97 1.87 1.83 1.81 1.94 1.80 1.78 1.91 2.19 1.63 1.53 1.84 1.73 1.58 1.53 1.83 1.89 1.72 1.77 1.52 1.73 1.58 1.93 1.93 1.60 2.32 2.10 2.20 1.92 1.77 1.74 1.75 1.91 1.75 1.85 2.00 1.72 1.96 1.75 2.46 2.01 2.01 1.78 1.99 2.14 1.62 2.37 2.33 1.88 1.99 1.86 2.41 2.41 2.51 1.88 1.78 2.53 1.58 1.60 1.50 1.77 1.95 1.62 1.68 2.09 2.17 1.30 1.96 1.62 Lost 2.03 2.24 1.77 2.30 2.15 2.38 1.75 2.30 2.10 1.76 1.97 2.23 1.57 1.68 1.42 2.28 2.00 2.05 2.23 2.12 2.00 1.77 1.89 260 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-3-F Age r — Pounds per Base Box ■ Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 13 16 Pennsylvania Apples 8 19 24 String Beans 10 37 40 Cider 7y 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7*/ 2 23 21 Michigan Pumpkin 7}^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 22 23 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^4 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9 J^ 1 2 Body Top Bottom 1.98 1.63 2.15 1.90 2.03 1.98 1.67 2.07 1.69 1.85 1.55 1.69 1.88 1.99 1.86 1.54 1.72 2.40 1.89 2.35 1.99 1.65 1.75 1.66 2.04 1.99 1.94 1.83 2.26 1.84 1.53 2.18 2.28 1.92 2.36 1.55 1.62 1.57 1.77 1.74 1.63 1.60 1.97 1.56 2.22 1.84 2.05 1.77 1.80 2.07 2.00 1.60 2.21 2.15 1.69 2.01 1.95 2.04 2.02 1.76 2.21 1.83 2.02 1.97 1.91 1.64 1.26 1.36 1.58 1.46 1.15 1.83 1.89 1.47 1.60 1.55 1.54 2.28 1.98 1.88 2.12 1.70 1.72 1.63 1.58 2.66 1.80 1.80 2.15 1.78 2.10 2.18 1.96 1.87 2.12 2.20 1.78 1.95 2.40 2.05 2.00 1.96 APPENDIX F 261 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Y-l-F Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^4 1 2 New York Apples 8 19 20 Pennsylvania Apples 8 8 12 String Beans 10 33 40 Cider iy 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 - 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 24 23 Michigan Pumpkin 7J4 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 19 20 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^4 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes §y 2 1 2 Body 1.77 1.75 1.80 1.61 2.10 1.56 2.16 1.54 1.54 1.57 Lost 2.45 1.95 1.89 2.20 2.05 1.59 2.61 1.93 1.75 1.91 1.55 1.68 1.60 1.54 2.44 2.23 2.54 2.05 1.58 2.23 2.26 1.90 2.00 Pounds per Base Box Top 2.20 2.21 1.86 1.85 1.81 2.24 1.86 2.03 2.14 1.94 1.88 1.91 1.91 1.80 1.93 1.99 2.09 2.20 1.90 2.31 1.75 1.76 2.60 1.75 1.71 1.86 2.13 2.47 1.85 2.28 2.31 2.03 2.16 1.68 Bottom 1.97 1.91 1.85 1.95 2.12 1.97 2.00 2.24 2.01 1.79 2.00 1.92 1.82 1.80 1.97 1.85 1.69 2.11 2.00 1.89 2.15 1.58 1.68 1.88 2.15 2.12 2.06 1.71 2.41 2.08 2.78 2.18 2.26 262 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916— Continued Y-4-F Age , Pounds per Base Box Article Months Michigan Apples 7^ New York Apples 8 Pennsylvania Apples 8 String Beans 10 Cider 7J^ Clam Juice 8^2 Condensed Milk 11 Evaporated Milk 11 Peas 11 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ Michigan Pumpkin 7^2 New York Pumpkin 8 Indiana Tomatoes 9 Maryland Tomatoes 9j4 New Jersey Tomatoes §y 2 Can No. Body Top Bottom 1 -2.07 1.67 1.85 2 1.80 2.03 1.77 20 1.50 1.86 1.56 23 1.82 1.85 1.76 19 1.99 1.90 1.86 20 1.96 1.77 1.85 36 1.82 1.65 2.25 37 1.53 1.82 2.10 7 2.27 1.99 2.17 8 2.06 1.90 2.13 11 1.55 1.85 2.12 12 1.80 1.68 2.13 7 1.72 1.87 2.00 8 2.07 1.93 2.04 1 1.80 1.56 1.85 2 1.92 2.30 2.00 19 2.10 1.92 1.86 20 2.17 2.15 1.86 21 1.89 1.75 2.00 22 1.82 1.93 1.92 23 1.65 1.97 1.87 24 1.85 1.82 1.90 17 1.55 1.92 1.96 15 1.75 2.03 2.23 7 2.01 1.63 2.01 8 1.32 1.52 1.86 19 1.42 1.50 1.89 20 1.87 2.17 2.03 1 1.91 2.08 1.96 2 1.95 2.05 2.48 1 1.73 2.38 2.12 2 1.68 2.08 2.10 1 2.20 1.85 2.15 2 2.15 1.76 1.87 APPENDIX F 263 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Z-l-F Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples l x / 2 1 2 New York Apples , 8 20 23 Pennsylvania Apples 8 6 10 String Beans 10 37 40 Cider I 1 /. 7. 8 Clam Juice 8y 2 11 ' 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7 1 /, 22 19 Michigan Pumpkin ^ l / 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 23 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes. 9^2 1 2 Body 1.72 2.30 1.91 1.70 1.81 1.73 1.85 1.85 2.45 2.18 2.01 2.46 1.49 1.47 2.46 2.23 2.40 1.55 2.52 2.15 2.22 2.00 1.95 1.60 1.62 1.55 2.63 2.14 1.65 1.78 2.06 2.03 2.40 1.76 Pounds per Base Box Top 2.02 1.88 1.86 1.85 2.06 1.83 1.63 1.85 1.79 1.76 2.58 1.93 1.78 1.85 2.00 2.05 2.02 1.90 2.13 1.90 1.83 2.05 1.77 1.78 2.01 1.90 2.40 1.85 1.68 2.25 2.06 2.00 2.18 2.30 Bottom 2.17 1.97 1.70 1.70 1.80 1.96 1.69 1.90 1.85 1.83 2.05 2.07 1.88 1.84 1.80 2.10 1.92 2.05 1.96 2.13 1.72 1.92 1.58 1.75 1.81 2.43 2.18 2.23 1.90 2.08 2.17 1.80 2.05 1.87 264 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916— Continued W-l-G Age r — Pounds per Base Box • Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7}4 1 2 New York Apples 8 8 12 Pennsylvania Apples 8 18 19 String Beans 10 45 46 Cider iy 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8y 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7^ 20 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7J4 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 16 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9J^ 1 2 Body Top Bottom 4.12 2.58 3.78 2.31 3.20 2.48 2.38 2.77 2.83 2.65 2.43 2.58 2.43 2.73 3.13 2.40 2.82 2.92 2.72 2.65 2.93 2.20 2.43 2.58 2.59 3.30 3.14 2.62 2.95 2.68 2,55 2.95 2.73 2.20 4.03 5.20 2.42 3.86 3.59 2.35 3.20 3.06 2.18- 2.73 2.58 2.58 2.84 2.72 2.24 3.21 2.49 2.76 4.24 2.86 2.65 2.88 2.89 2.52 2.82 2.49 1.20 2.53 2.72 2.54 4.31 3.62 3.00 3.30 2.50 2.48 2.86 2.90 2.28 3.05 2.38 2.35 3.90 .94 2.38 2.78 2.64 2.82 3.02 2.42 2.30 3.05 3.20 2.54 3.10 2.67 2.76 3.30 3.46 2.70 3.12 2.74 2.64 2.78 3.24 5.40 2.62 2.90 APPENDIX F 265 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued W-2-G Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples ^Yz 1 2 New York Apples 8 13 22 Pennsylvania Apples 8 19 20 String Beans 10 39 40 Cider ny 2 7 8 Clam Juice Sy 2 11 • 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7J^ 19 20 Michigan Pumpkin 7 x / 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 17 18 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 2.76 2.99 3.26 2.60 2.92 2.56 2.20 2.29 3.27 2.69 2.65 2.69 2.78 3.02 2.63 2.13 3.16 4.63 2.80 4.12 2.55 2.19 2.50 2.70 2.27 2.63 3.47 2.39 3.23 2.84 2.37 3.17 2.65 2.38 2.67 2.93 1.95 3.07 3.04 2.15 2.65 3.57 2.50 2.63 2.64 2.75 5.62 2.78 2.75 2.86 3.30 2.76 2.70 3.16 2.51 2.77 3.14 2.09 2.70 2.66 2.60 2.72 3.44 2.82 4.32 3.22 2.55 2.47 3.77 2.58 2.11 2.43 2.29 2.20 2.49 3.97 2.88 2.67 2.22 3.58 3.00 3.08 2.94 2.42 3.45 3.40 2.90 4.17 3.64 3.56 2.48 2.66 3.30 2.65 2.16 3.05 3.40 2.58 2.85 2.93 266 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-l-G Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 8 13 Pennsylvania Apples 8 19 20 String Beans 10 37 40 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8y 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7*/ 2 20 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7>4 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 23 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes §y 2 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 Body 2.18 2.41 2.25 2.17 2.40 2.66 2.26 2.50 2.64 2.95 2.00 2.36 2.55 2.29 2.00 3.45 1.95 5.02 2.20 1.96 2.01 2.54 3.36 1.90 2.41 2.43 2.40 2.22 5.70 2.40 2.27 4.68 2.46 2.20 Pounds per Base Box Top 2.84 2.52 3.33 2.68 3.07 2.90 2.98 2.66 2.60 3.07 2.35 2.57 2.64 3.07 2.75 2.63 2.75 2.95 4.34 2.93 2.74 2.72 2.55 2.77 2.72 3.10 2.67 2.60 2.73 2.68 2.88 2.72 2.58 Bottom 3.18 4.52 2. 84 2.70 2.70 2.84 2.86 2.75 3.04 2.86 2.50 3.00 2.80 2.71 2.51 2.75 3.26 4.06 2.56 2.56 3.47 4.08 2.12 2.98 2.77 2.88 2.60 2.90 2.94 2.54 6.50 3.03 2.58 2.93 APPENDIX F 267 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued X-3-G Age r — Pounds per Base Box v Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7 l / 2 1 2 New York Apples 8 16 17 Pennsylvania Apples 8 21 22 String Beans 10 5 8 Cider Vy 2 7 8 Clam Juice Sy 2 11 . 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7 J / 2 19 20 Michigan Pumpkin 7 J / 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 16 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^4 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes % J / 2 1 2 Body Top Bottom 2.18 3.16 2.85 4.75 3.05 2.55 3.00 2.52 2.96 2.12 2.78 2.40 2.05 4.63 2.80 2.69 4.61 2.65 2.62 2.70 3.28 1.87 4.02 2.87 3.37 3.28 2.79 2.56 2.89 2.82 2.01 2.74 2.50 2.09 2.88 3.68 2.58 2.43 2.89 2.35 2.66 3.31 2.15 2.42 3.75 3.50 3.00 3.20 4.34 3.45 2.92 2.62 2.80 2.97 2.31 2.85 6.72 4.37 4.33 3.47 2.44 2.53 3.20 3.33 3.00 4.75 2.41 2.80 3.03 2.38 2.60 3.08 2.20 2.28 2.95 2.07 2.87 2.77 2.30 2.65 2.45 1.80 2.53 Lost 2.92 2.70 2.12 2.58 2.88 2.78 1.94 2.54 2.86 2.55 2.84 3.08 3.75 2.93 3.00 3.22 3.25 2.50 268 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Y-l-G Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples iy 2 1 2 New York Apples 8 15 22 Pennsylvania Apples 8 8 9 String Beans 10 37 40 Cider 7*/ 2 7 8 Clam Juice 8y 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 Illinois Pumpkin 7 J /> 23 19 Michigan Pumpkin 7y> 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 19 20 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9j4 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9y 1 2 Body 2.52 4.30 3.28 4.46 2.32 2.28 1.98 2.53 2.82 4.07 2.46 3.00 2.43 2.70 2.23 2.36 2.05 2.13 2.92 2.65 2.10 4.45 2.40 3.09 2.65 3.39 3.14 2.53 2.15 2.68 2.32 2.30 2.40 2.62 Pounds per Base Box Top 2.50 3.38 2.86 3.38 3.69 3.62 2.90 2.83 3.45 2.53 2.26 2.46 2.84 2.54 3.20 2.78 2.96 2.67 2.42 2.58 2.71 2.64 2.96 2.61 2.58 2.54 2.40 2.45 3.15 2.67 Lost 2.50 2.95 3.12 Bottom 2.62 2.74 2.82 2.61 2.46 3.50 2.73 3.13 3.08 3.54 2.75 2.68 2.95 2.75 2.62 2.48 2.85 3.28 2.92 2.75 2.63 2.62 2.72 2.62 2.37 2.11 2.43 2.52 2.46 3.09 Lost 2.58 2.76 2.98 APPENDIX F 269 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Y-4-G Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7}4 1 2 New York Apples 8 20 23 Pennsylvania Apples 8 7 8 String Beans 10 43 47 Cider 7^ 7 8 Clam Juice 8 x / 2 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 21 Illinois Pumpkin 7 J / 2 22 21 Michigan Pumpkin 7 J / 2 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 21 24 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9^ 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes % J / 2 1 2 Body 2.48 1.13 2.60 2.20 2.46 2.46 2.18 2.28 3.24 2.52 2.48 3.91 3.77 2.13 2.92 2.75 2.18 2.46 2.15 2.72 2.20 3.62 2.56 3.95 2.52 2.67 2.80 2.62 2.60 2.68 3.13 2.25 2.76 2.45 Pounds per Base Box Top 3.30 2.96 2.60 2.90 3.21 3.05 2.81 3.23 2.65 2.36 2.98 3.12 2.73 2.63 2.88 2.95 3.35 2.47 3.20 2.70 2.75 2.72 2.92 2.55 2.96 3.16 2.37 2.20 3.16 3.20 3.18 3.44 2.53 3.24 Bottom 3.38 2.90 2.67 4.17 2.63 3.05 2.62 2.60 2.57 4.19 3.00 2.90 3.57 3.10 2.75 2.64 2.92 3.56 2.74 3.10 2.50 2.18 2.32 4.05 3.09 2.47 6.57 3.00 2.82 3.28 3.06 3.05 3.00 2.70 270 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Z-l-G Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 7^ 1 2 New York Apples 8 20 23 Pennsylvania Apples 8 9 11 String Beans 10 22 40 Cider 7% 7 8 Clam Juice 8^ 11 12 Condensed Milk 11 7 8 Evaporated Milk 11 1 2 Peas 11 19 20 21 22 23 21 Illinois Pumpkin 7 J / 2 23 21 Michigan Pumpkin 7J^ 7 8 New York Pumpkin 8 21 22 Indiana Tomatoes 9 1 2 Maryland Tomatoes 9% 1 2 New Jersey Tomatoes 9J-4 1 2 Pounds per Base Box ^ Body Top Bottom 2.20 2.87 2.64 2.47 2.95 3.45 2.23 2.45 2.66 2.58 2.37 2.76 2.10 3.25 3.05 2.42 4.58 2.53 2.30 2.38 2.33 2.12 2.40 4.65 2.60 2.43 2.86 2.57 2.83 3.02 2.58 2.50 2.68 2.57 3.20 2.90 2.20 2.79 6.34 2.32 2.38 2.68 2.47 2.73 3.30 2.31 2.80 3.25 2.67 2.71 3.08 2.42 4.15 3.03 2.42 2.66 2.80 2.41 2.70 3.06 2.66 2.77 3.85 2.62 3.30 2.58 2.10 2.65 2.94 2.60 2.75 2.63 2.74 4.65 2.42 2.43 2.49 3.16 2.35 3.75 2.86 2.94 4.93 2.57 2.32 2.75 2.80 2.95 3.16 3.20 2.56 3.31 2.98 3.06 2.78 2.63 4.55 2.77 3.10 2.97 2.60 3.82 Body Top Bottom .66 .60 .87 .79 .68 .74 .45 .78 .68 .66 .64 .64 .71 .94 .72 .63 .94 Lost M .71 .77 .75 .81 .78 .80 .78 .65 .88 .82 .70 .88 .85 .81 .81 .79 .74 .87 .78 .73 .55 .67 .62 .51 .69 .58 .52 .70 .62 .63 .59 .66 .81 .79 .71 .76 .76 .73 .50 .83 .80 .65 .87 .78 .68 .73 .77 .68 .65 .48 .69 .85 .93 .77 .77 .97 .79 .69 .64 APPENDIX F 271 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 W-l-A Age f~ — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9^ 7 8 New York Apples 10 18 19 Pennsylvania Apples 10 14 18 String Beans 12 4 11 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10y 2 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 ' 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^2 11 12 Michigan Pumpkin 9j4 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 11 12 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^2 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11/^ 9 10 Salmon s 9 Tuna Fish 11 Lost . . . Lost Lost W-2-A Michigan Apples 9J4 7 8 New York Apples 10 4 12 Pennsylvania Apples 10 1 4 String Beans 12 23 24 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ 2 4 Michigan Pumpkin 9^2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 5 6 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes llj^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11 J4 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... .73 .79 .84 .80 .89 .76 .88 .78 .62 .68 .49 .55 .65 .63 .58 .78 .93 .72 .83 .93 .80 .61 .71 .66 .86 .68 .78 .79 .80 .73 .80 .78 .87 .81 1.03 .88 .69 .75 .68 .67 .73 .54 .59 .80 .63 .67 .69 .55 .65 .80 .61 .75 .80 ,79 .86 .66 73 .88 .66 ,58 .78 .93 68 .95 .84 ,68 .73 .94 ,72 .83 .83 ,70 .68 .77 73 .83 .74 71 .91 .83 Body Top Bottom .59 .75 .79 .58 .70 .73 .53 .65 .68 .65 .70 .53 .63 .73 .68 .69 .83 .75 .88 .74 .84 .77 .65 .76 .65 .75 .65 .63 .68 .78 .78 .74 .91 .84 .79 .96 .95 .78 .73 .71 .59 .56 .68 .68 .67 .70 .72 .77 .70 .70 .67 .71 .74 .98 .71 .78 .86 .54 .80 .79 .78 .69 .80 .77 .73 .84 .78 .73 .78 .54 .75 .93 .73 .85 .68 .83 .79 .89 272 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916— Continued X-l-A Age r — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9 z / 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 17 18 Pennsylvania Apples 10 10 11 String Beans 12 15 16 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ 1 9 Michigan Pumpkin 9 T / 2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 1 5 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11 ^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes llj^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 ,10 ... .78 .70 X-3-A Michigan Apples i 9 l / 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 9 12 Pennsylvania Apples 10 9 11 String Beans 12 15 16 Cider 9y 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10J^ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9y 3 11 Michigan Pumpkin . .• 9y 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 9 12 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes liy 2 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes liy 2 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish n io ... .85 .85 .80 .75 .88 .87 .76 .84 .60 .78 .57 .67 .73 .59 .78 .78 .95 .74 .80 .75 .80 .75 .74 .69 .74 .77 .85 .90 .76 .90 .63 .87 .90 .78 .76 .96 .77 .80 .75 .70 .83 .59 .52 '.68 .63 .60 .54 .74 .65 .64 .61 .81 .60 .81 .76 .61 .73 .76 .71 .68 .83 .73 .74 .76 .87 1.13 .87 Lost .83 .87 .92 .60 .74 .73 .68 .78 .78 .75 .75 .84 APPENDIX F 273 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Y-l-A Age , Pounds per Base Box N Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9y 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 9 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 11 16 String Beans 12 24 29 Cider '9y 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 . 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9y 2 9 11 Michigan Pumpkin 9y 2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 5 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^4 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... .75 .78 Y-4-A Michigan Apples 9 J / 2 7 8 New York Apples -10 14 15 Pennsylvania Apples 10 9 17 String Beans 12 23 33 Cider 9y 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9y 2 4 12 Michigan Pumpkin 9y 2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 7 8 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... .78 .80 3ody Top Bottom .55 .80 .77 .73 .68 .90 .53 .73 .59 .68 .68 .98 .64 .87 .88 .75 .88 .85 .77 .83 .85 .78 .71 .68 .82 .75 .78 .82 .88 .66 .88 1.04 .91 .89 .75 .88 .68 .74 .78 .69 .68 .69 .70 .65 .58 .65 .51 .59 .69 .70 .61 .83 .65 .73 .81 .70 .73 .64 .78 .78 .73 .83 .79 .70 .65 .74 .68 .73 .83 .68 .77 .68 .68 .88 .78 .69 1.16 .72 ,65 .99 .86 .75 .89 .93 .54 .65 .68 ,56 .78 .68 48 78 .94 .69 .74 .83 ,96 .92 .78 ,89 .84 .68 .72 .75 .78 .97 .75 .70 .90 .94 .84 .81 .86 1.00 .86 .90 .98 .69 .53 .61 ,66 .70 .72 .61 .64 .64 .66 .71 .72 .68 • .74 .79 .74 .80 .87 .64 .78 .68 .78 .86 .85 .64 1.08 .85 .64 1.18 .87 .83 .68 .85 .82 .85 .83 .89 .94 .80 274 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Z-l-A Article Months Michigan Apples 9j4 New York Apples 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 String Beans 12 Cider 9^ Clam Juice 10J^ Condensed Milk 13 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ Michigan Pumpkin 9^ New York Pumpkin 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ New Jersey Tomatoes llj^ Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 Pounds per Base Box Can No. Body Top Bottom 7 .69 .73 .72 8 .74 .80 .78 21 .58 .59 .58 24 .58 .62 .64 Lost Lost Lost Lost Lost Lost Lost Lost 25 .79 .82 .83 26 .67 .85 .71 9 .63 .82 .98 10 .68 .68 .68 13 .91 .86 .82 14 .94 .78 .94 9 .98 .89 .83 9 .71 .80 .70 11 .59 .62 .65 9 .67 .96 .76 10 .69 .83 .79 9 .71 .86 .89 10 .69 .79 .89 9 .63 .65 .67 10 .74 .68 .68 9 .66 .68 .83 10 .82 .69 .78 9 .68 .68 .85 10 .70 85 .83 .75 86 .74 10 70 .90 Body Top Bottom 1.00 1.14 .99 .88 1.08 .84 .64 .93 .39 .68 .87 .73 .78 .73 Lost .84 .97 1.10 .98 .75 .73 .79 .89 .83 .73 .97 .88 1.00 .98 .97 .93 1.06 .88 .93 1.03 1.10 .88 1.12 .94 .75 .80 .63 .61 .85 .71 .91 .85 .73 .80 .92 .83 .74 1.00 .89 .87 1.09 1.00 .98 1.04 .93 1.04 .94 .98 1.12 1.12 .94 1.10 .94 1.06 .90 .68 .98 .76 1.13 1.03 1.00 .85 .88 APPENDIX F 275 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued W-l-B Age ^ — Pounds per Base Box ^ Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9y 2 1 2 New York Apples 10 8 16 Pennsylvania Apples 10 1 2 String Beans 12 27 31 Cider ^A 9 10 Clam Juice ^A 13 • 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin . . 9^ 11 12 Michigan Pumpkin 9*4 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 9 12 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11/4 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11/4 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 29 '. . '. '.83 .59 W-2-B Michigan Apples 9/ 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 7 12 Pennsylvania Apples 10 21 23 String Beans 12 21 24 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10J4 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9*4 4 12 Michigan Pumpkin 9}4 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 7 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11J4 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11/4 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... .95 .78 .88 1.14 .96 1.09 1.00 .98 .78 .87 .70 .73 .84 .97 .75 .87 .93 .80 .90 1.13 .89 .91 1.03 .89 .76 1.02 1.09 .88 1.09 .98 1.03 1.12 .87 1.01 1.11 .97 .96 1.07 .83 .90 .95 .57 .68 .68 .70 .59 .78 .83 .92 .78 .89 .82 .91 .91 .86 .96 .94 .89 1.04 .77 .88 .88 .88 .95 1.10 .95 1.03 .96 1.03 1.05 1.07 .87 Lost 1.08 .87 .93 1.13 .98 .79 .87 276 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued X-l-B Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9^ 7 8 New York Apples 10 10 17 Pennsylvania Apples 10 15 String Beans 12 30 34 Cider 9/ 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^2 8 11 Michigan Pumpkin 9J/2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 3 4 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^2 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11 J^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 X-3-B Michigan Apples 9 l / 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 7 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 8 10 String Beans 12 25 29 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10y 2 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ 4 S Michigan Pumpkin %y 2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 3 5 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^4 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 9 Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom .78 .98 1.13 .69 .98 1.05 .78 .89 .83 .74 1.07 .76 .78 1.05 1.03 .58 .68 .59 1.13 1.00 .97 .62 .85 .89 1.03 1.24 .97 .97 .82 .95 1.01 1.06 .98 1.11 1.17 .89 .78 1.08 .95 .79 .68 M .73 .72 .90 .95 .78 .95 .98 .79 .84 1.11 .96 1.20 .91 .81 1.13 .95 1.13 1.05 .93 .89 1.03 .85 1.03 .87 .88 .95 1.03 1.00 .94 1.03 .89 .92 .94 1.06 1.76 1.00 1.28 1.03 1.00 1.26 1.04 .87 1.09 1.09 .78 1.03 1.05 .78 .98 .94 .95 1.05 1.33 .94 1.08 1.09 .88 1.05 1.10 .97 .98 1.04 1.13 .92 1.04 1.05 1.02 1.07 1.19 1.29 1.45 1.04 1.27 1.16 1.03 .74 1.18 .70 .88 .77 .68 1.06 .81 .81 .81 .98 .82 .96 .79 1.07 .99 .93 1.11 1.01 .89 1.05 .98 .94 1.16 .99 1.12 1.05 1.08 .98 .98 .90 1.08 .98 .93 1.18 1.03 1.20 1.18 1.04 1.23 1.12 1.20 1.09 APPENDIX F 277 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON, CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Y-l-B Age , Pounds per Base Box ^ Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 9^ 7 .79 1.16 1.25 8 .95 .95 1.25 New York Apples 10 1 .83 .98 .85 2 .83 .80 1.03 Pennsylvania Apples 10 , 15 .78 1.05 .97 16 .83 1.16 1.00 String Beans 12 26 .99 1.21 1.15 30 .91 1.10 1.03 Cider 9y 2 9 1.04 1.12 1.18 10 1.09 .97 .96 Clam Juice 10y 2 13 1.03 1.03 1.16 ' 14 1.09 1.12 1.02 Condensed Milk 13 9 .87 1.18 1.13 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ 1 .72 .87 1.03 5 .86 .73 .93 Michigan Pumpkin 9^ 9 .78 1.01 .89 10 .89 1.06 .89 New York Pumpkin 10 1 1.21 1.10 1.16 4 .93 1.11 1.09 .Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 .68 1.00 1.00 10 .93 .90 1.00 Maryland Tomatoes liy 2 9 1.03 1.08 1.12 10 .87 1.08 .89 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 .86 .98 1.12 10 .98 1.02 .98 Salmon 9 .. 1.05 1.19 1.09 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... 1.08 1.09 Y-4-B Michigan Apples 9 J / 2 7 .94 1.03 1.07 8 .98 .95 .98 New York Apples 10 23 .83 1.07 .98 24 1.12 1.03 .94 Pennsylvania Apples 10 13 .88 .97 .86 15 .94 1.09 1.04 String Beans 12 9 .90 .97 .78 10 1.04 .93 1.01 Cider 9^ 9 1.06 .89 .95 10 .92 .96 .97 Clam Juice 10y 2 13 1.17 1.06 1.10 14 1.22 1.03 1.20 Condensed Milk 13 9 1.16 1.18 1.12 Illinois Pumpkin 9 J / 2 1 ,.73 .79 • .83 2 .91 .68 .90 Michigan Pumpkin 9^ 9 .73 .67 1.01 10 .89 .74 .92 New York Pumpkin 10 1 .91 .90 1.17 2 1.33 .86 .90 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 .89 .89 1.12 10 .90 1.15 .88 Maryland Tomatoes '11^ 9 .92 .90 1.00 10 .88 1.08 1.38 New Jersey Tomatoes H^ 9 .98 .94 1.13 10 1.03 .98 .98 Salmon 9 .. 1.00 1.00 1.11 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... 1.03 1.00 278 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Z-l-B Age , — Pounds per Base Box N Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 9^ 7 .88 1.08 .98 8 .88 1.10 .83 New York Apples 10 21 .98 .95 .97 24 .65 1.08 .98 Pennsylvania Apples 10 Lost Lost Lost Lost Lost Lost Lost Lost String Beans 12 37 1.10 1.17 .77 38 1.01 1.10 .95 Cider 9^ 9 1.12 1.04 1.01 10 1.01 1.07 1.01 Clam Juice 10>^ 13 1.27 1.08 1.10 14 1.14 1.15 1.11 Condensed Milk 13 9 1.20 1.10 1.09 Illinois Pumpkin 9>4 8 .51 .78 .59 12 .69 .78 .74 Michigan Pumpkin $y 2 9 .91 .86 1.02 10 .98 .78 1.16 New York Pumpkin 10 4 .91 1.23 1.07 7 .96 .87 1.24 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 1.03 .84 1.05 10 1.15 1.05 1.03 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 .90 .87 Lost 10 .85 .98 1.20 New Jersey Tomatoes liy 2 9 1.12 .98 1.03 10 1.09 1.10 1.03 Salmon 9 . . 1.09 .81 .90 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... 1.13 1.03 APPENDIX F 279 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916— Continued W-l-C Age , — Pounds per Base Box s Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 9^ 7 1.06 1.19 1.12 8 .98 1.31 1.14 New York Apples 10 4 .68 1.00 .83 22 .73 .79 1.28 Pennsylvania Apples 10 ' 8 1.31 1.16 1.12 9 1.13 Lost 1.19 String Beans 12 38 1.18 .93 1.26 39 .98 1.32 1.07 Cider 9^ 9 .90 1.36 .96 10 .98 .95 1.00 Clam Juice 10^ 13 1.37 1.32 1.06 14 1.11 1.11 1.13 Condensed Milk. 13 9 1.08 Lost 1.23 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ 9 .95 1.06 .80 10 .88 .93 .86 Michigan Pumpkin 9*/ 2 9 .75 1.06 .80 10 .91 1.10 .91 New York Pumpkin 10 4 1.17 ... .91 5 .89 1.18 .99 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 1.07 1.28 1.00 10 .99 1.10 1.00 Maryland Tomatoes liy 2 9 1.43 .93 1.15 10 1.18 1.18 .98 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 1.03 1.20 1.22 10 1.05 .93 1.22 Salmon 9 . . .99 1.08 1.08 Tuna Fish 11 48 ... 1.12 1.15 W-2-C Michigan Apples 9 1 /. 7 8 New York Apples 10 13 19 Pennsylvania Apples 10 13 16 String Beans 12 15 16 Cider 9y 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10>^ 13 14 Condensed Milk .13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9 l / 2 3 4 Michigan Pumpkin 9y 2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 7 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes liy 2 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes llj^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... 1.35 1.15 1.19 1.38 1.05 1.10 1.19 .74 .98 1.12 1.05 1.00 .87 1.24 .85 1.22 1.36 .90 1.25 1.58 1.18 .95 .76 .91 1.30 1.11 .95 1.15 1.21 1.13 1.16 1.06 1.27 1.14 1.13 1.24 1.11 1.26 1.03 1.13 1.33 .75 1.06 .84 .81 1.01 .92 .97 .92 .86 1.12 .72 1.13 1.03 .96 1.03 1.03 1.24 1.27 1.02 1.19 1.15 .98 1.23 1.15 1.07 1.45 1.15 1.05 1.18 .98 .98 1.23 . 1.23 1.13 1.24 1.23 1.24 1.27 .98 280 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued X-l-C Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9^ 7 8 New York Apples 10 10 17 Pennsylvania Apples 10 7 8 String Beans . . . 12 15 16 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10y 2 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ 4 12 Michigan Pumpkin dy 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 7 11 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes liy 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes liy 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 X-3-C Michigan Apples d]/ 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 15 18 Pennsylvania Apples 10 9 14 String Beans 12 15 16 Cider . .' 9y 9 10 Clam Juice 10y 2 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9y 2 8 Michigan Pumpkin $y 2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 9 12 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes liy 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 9 Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 1.08 1.22 1.35 1.03 1.20 1.20 .77 1.05 1.05 .88 1.04 1.07 .90 1.22 1.08 .83 1.14 1.05 1.21 1.15 1.13 1.03 1.07 1.07 1.00 1.03 1.30 1.08 1.15 1.40 1.17 1.37 1.44 1.23 1.19 1.31 1.05 1.40 1.30 .91 .87 .68 .92 .83 .70 .86 1.02 1.20 .91 1.02 .88 1.12 1.08 1.35 1.09 1.19 1.03 1.15 1.14 1.05 1.32 1.03 1.09 1.37 1.24 1.24 1.13 1.22 1.12 1.12 1.00 1.12 1.33 1.35 1.22 1.10 1.31 1.19 1.40 .95 .85 1.14 1.24 1.05 1.48 1.33 .79 1.18 1.08 1.00 1.03 1.27 .98 1.30 1.38 1.13 1.25 1.24 1.28 1.06 1.17 1.42 1.01 1.22 1.05 1.27 1.16 1.15 1.25 1.17 1.59 1.28 1.47 1.11 1.16 1.42 1.22 1.23 1.28 .69 .87 1.03 .72 .99 1.16 .77 .89 1.11 .94 .91 1.14 .91 1.37 1.27 .96 1.17 1.27 1.05 1.16 1.25 1.05 1.22 1.28 1.03 1.47 1.29 1.12 1.35 1.98 .94 1.32 .89 1.08 1.47 .68 1.16 1.03 .99 1.05 1.08 APPENDIX F 281 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Y-l-C Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9y 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 15 16 Pennsylvania Apples 10 5 6 String Beans 12 31 32 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10y 2 13 ' 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin %y 2 3 4 Michigan Pumpkin 9% 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 4 8 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^2 9 10 ■ New Jersey Tomatoes 11J/2 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 Y-4-C Michigan Apples dy 2 7 ' 8 New York Apples 10 23 24 Pennsylvania Apples 10 14 15 String Beans 12 12 17 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 2y 2 3 4 Michigan Pumpkin 9y 2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 2 6 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes liy 2 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 9 Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom .98 1.15 1.05 .94 1.13 1.34 .93 1.14 1.03 1.03 1.14 1.37 .97 1.08 1.12 .89 1.16 1.10 1.14 1.13 1.17 1.08 1.20 1.13 1.10 1.10 M 1.10 .97 .89 1.17 1.32 1.08 1.23 1.28 1.11 1.08 1.15 1.33 .78 .74 .76 .74 .94 .84 .92 .86 .98 1.06 .94 1.00 1.24 .80 1.12 .96 1.01 1.00 .95 .90 .85 1.09 1.18 1.00 .95 1.24 1.15 .94 1.25 1.08 1.08 1.13 1.15 1.09 .95 .98 1.32 1.43 1.40 1.13 1.20 1.08 1.13 1.38 1.18 1.20 1.15 1.12 1.27 1.08 1.10 1.12 1.08 1.10 1.22 1.12 1.17 1.23 1.05 1.05 1.27 1.07 1.11 1.01 .85 1.16 1.15 1.07 1.30 1.15 1.24 1.29 1.19 1.28 1.20 1.11 1.17 1.23 1.13 1.08 .91 .69 .85 .91 .83 .89 .93 1.20 .98 1.01 .78 1.32 1.11 .93 1.15 1.13 1.30 1.29 1.40 1.08 1.30 1.03 1.16 1.05 1.18 .94 1.29 .98 1.37 1.24 1.24 1.22 1.13 1.27 1.55 1.15 1.41 1.42 1.41 1.13 1.13 282 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916— Continued Z-l-C Age .Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples ^Vz 7 8 New York Apples 10 21 24 Pennsylvania Apples 10 14 14 String Beans 12 27 30 Cider 9y 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10 j£ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9}4 1 5 Michigan Pumpkin 9^2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 2 4 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^2 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^2 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 Body 1.12 1.12 .83 .94 Lost 1.15 1.00 .99 1.03 1.14 1.27 1.16 1.18 1.12 .96 .95 .89 1.19 1.06 1.42 1.24 1.00 1.27 .93 1.45 .96 Pounds per Base Box — Top 1.13 1.18 1.03 1.05 .85 Lost 1.33 1.17 1.08 1.25 1.26 1.27 1.28 .91 1.20 1.13 1.18 1.15 1.08 1.05 1.17 1.21 1.29 1.03 1.30 .96 Bottom 1.13 1.15 1.05 1.03 1.38 Lost 1.18 1.12 1.13 1.18 1.24 1.17 1.18 .69 .61 1.11 1.21 1.18 1.30 .98 1.03 1.17 1.14 1.14 1.15 1.26 1.24 APPENDIX F 283 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916— Continued W-l-D Age , Pounds per Base Box N Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 9^ 7 1.26 1.38 1.34 8 1.14 1.03 1.16 New York Apples 10 19 1.19 1.23 1.37 22 1.12 1.38 1.08 Pennsylvania Apples 10 9 1.29 1.59 1.33 15 1.12 1.35 1.55 String Beans 12 2 1.32 1.08 1.22 24 1.28 1.19 1.11 Cider 9^ 9 1.37 1.30 1.33 10 1.43 1.29 1.33 Clam Juice 10^ 13 1.27 1.37 1.17 14 1.29 1.30 1.33 Condensed Milk 13 9 1.18 1.29 Lost Illinois Pumpkin 9 J / 2 11 .81 1.11 1.11 12 1.07 .95 1.15 Michigan Pumpkin 9y 2 9 1.11 .94 1.09 10 1.00 1.02 1.20 New York Pumpkin 10 9 1.52 1.42 1.19 12 1.18 1.21 1.37 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 1.28 1.46 1.37 10 1.24 1.43 1.43 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 1.05 1.37 1.23 10 .98 1.34 1.29 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 1.23 1.28 1.20 10 1.37 1.33 1.35 Salmon 9 . . 1.31 1.35 1.19 Tuna Fish 11 36 ... 1.32 1.46 W-2-D Michigan Apples 9 J / 2 7 8 £Jew York Apples 10 19 » 23 Pennsylvania Apples 10 8 17 String Beans 12 28 40 Cider 9y 2 9 10 Clam Juice , 10y 2 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9 J / 2 11 12 Michigan Pumpkin 9 T / 2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 11 12 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11J4 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes liy 2 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 '. . . 1.46 1.30 1.22 1.49 1.28 1.29 1.34 1.05 1.24 1.14 1.17 .93 1.37 1.05 1.12 1.49 1.48 1.10 1.13 1.83 1.03 1.28 1.38 1.23 1.26 1.44 1.15 1.39 1.52 1.33 1.31 1.13 1.31 1.30 1.19 1.57 1.32 1.39 1.37 1.53 1.42 .92 1.50 .80 .99 1.34 1.21 .95 .90 1.38 1.32 1.06 1.15 1.51 1.19 1.35 1.50 1.51 1.57 1.25 1.35 1.55 1.53 1.38 1.59 1.63 1.46 1.67 .98 1.18 1.37 1.43 1.43 1.23 1.37 1.37 1.68 1.22 1.58 1.49 284 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued X-l-D Age ,- — Pounds per Base Box ■ Article Months Michigan Apples 9}4 New York Apples 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 String Beans 12 Cider 9^ Clam Juice 10^4 Condensed Milk 13 Illinois Pumpkin 9j4 Michigan Pumpkin 9^2 It New York Pumpkin 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 Maryland Tomatoes 11}^ New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... 1.53 1.28 X-3-D Michigan Apples 9]/ 2 New York Apples , 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 String Beans 12 Cider * 9^ Clam Juice lOJ^ Condensed Milk 13 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ Michigan Pumpkin 9j4 New York Pumpkin 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ New Jersey Tomatoes 11J/2 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 ' 9 ... 1.45 1.43 in No. Body Top Bottom 7 1.22 1.50 1.29 8 1.15 1.55 1.38 12 1.03 1.47 1.43 18 1.06 1.12 1.30 4 1.12 1.53 1.30 5 1.30 1.45 1.43 3 1.32 1.34 1.11 36 1.11 1.19 1.28 9 1.36 1.17 1.45 10 1.28 1.30 1.59 13 1.27 1.35 1.42 14 1.35 1.45 1.72 9 1.28 1.33 1.43 5 '.79 1.22 .73 10 .79 .77 .77 9 1.06 1.15 1.18 10 1.11 1.22 1.34 3 1.21 1.30 1.30 4 1.13 1.52 1.65 9 1.37 1.15 1.32 10 1.24 1.25 1.29 9 1.32 1.57 1.29 10 1.57 1.28 1.43 9 1.18 1.75 1.35 10 1.40 1.24 1.18 1.52 1.48 1.51 7 1.24 1.35 1.61 8 .83 1.59 1.65 15 1.32 1.36 1.10 18 .77 1.43 1.33 13 1.36 1.30 1.38 17 1.35 1.29 1.18 9 1.36 1.59 1.17 22 1.30 1.35 1.28 9 1.18 1.63 1.43 10 1.62 1.16 1.73 13 1.73 1.72 1.23 14 1.65 2.21 1.35 9 1.19 1.29 1.54 8 1.25 .94 1.11 10 .82 .89 1.16 9 1.19 1.12 1.47 10 .78 1.30 1.19 1 1.27 1.11 1.19 4 1.65 1.50 1.47 9 1.37 1.64 1.24 10 1.46 Lost 1.35 9 1.43 1.13 1.23 10 1.47 1.25 1.87 9 1.42 1.38 1.78 10 1.12 1.30 1.77 . , 1.25 1.30 1.51 APPENDIX F 285 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916— Continued Y-l-D Body Top Bottom 1.35 1.47 1.29 1.00 1.62 1.50 1.07 1.38 1.58 1.13 1.45 1.28 1.38 1.30 1.33 1.45 1.65 1.31 1.30 1.18 1.21 1.42 1.42 1.09 1.30 1.16 1.32 1.22 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.82 1.36 1.32 1.35 1.38 1.25 1.43 1.28 .97 .99 1.6 i .96 1.15 .72 1.08 1.08 .72 1.07 1.18 1.47 1.46 1.71 1.40 1.42 1.42 1.47 1.29 1.27 1.54 1.37 1.12 1.65 1.23 1.42 1.48 1.08 1.42 1.11 1.32 1.32 1.33 1.13 1.16 1.53 1.73 1.58 1.44 Age r^ — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9^ 7 8 New York Apples 10 13 14 Pennsylvania Apples 10 7 18 String Beans 12 27 28 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 ' 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9J/2 1 11 Michigan Pumpkin 9^> 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 9 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^4 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 i6 ... 1.24 1.58 Y-4-D Michigan Apples * 9 J / 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 16 19 Pennsylvania Apples 10 11 12 String Beans 12 23 35 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ 1 2 Michigan Pumpkin 9^ 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 9 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes llj^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... 1.47 1.18 1.17 1.44 1.41 1.18 1.45 1.58 1.12 1.33 1.16 1.03 1.29 1.20 1.41 1.24 1.37 1.17 1.15 1.55 1.39 1.29 1.21 1.30 1.61 1.27 1.21 1.31 1.33 1.32 1.53 1.53 1.48 1.32 1.17 1.48 1.37 1.30 1.33 1.23 1.29 1.11 .95 1.20 1.29 1.15 1.19 1.08 1.10 1.18 1.16 .83 1.06 1.24 1.35 1.35 1.50 1.38 1.16 1.18 1.38 1.35 1.19 1.45 1.38 1.20 1.03 ' 1.40 1.19 1.35 1.52 1.58 1.03 1.25 1.35 1.78 1.22 1.37 1.55 1.11 286 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Z-l-D Age , Pounds per Base Box ^ Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 9y 2 7 1.34 1.39 1.42 8 1.40 1.26 1.34 New York Apples 10 21 1.32 1.28 1.15 24 1.16 1.26 1.47 Pennsylvania Apples 10 18 1.38 1.00 1.28 20 1.15 1.15 1.61 String Beans 12 15 1.34 1.35 1.37 43 1.39 1.27 1.54 Cider 9^ 9 1.43 1.36 1.23 10 1.52 1.49 1.60 Clam Juice 10^ 13 1.22 1.41 1.37 14 1.41 1.56 1.41 Condensed Milk 13 9 1.48 1.53 1.35 Illinois Pumpkin 9 J / 2 5 1.07 1.38 1.24 7 1.12 1.38 1.14 Michigan Pumpkin 9 1 /, 9 1.04 1.19 1.34 10 .93 1.23 1.28 New York Pumpkin 10 1 1.17 1.42 1.50 2 1.36 1.35 1.41 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 1.03 1.55 1.43 10 1.63 1.37 1.52 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 1.33 1.12 1.43 10 1.53 1.38 1.35 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 1.46 1.05 1.43 10 1.85 1.54 1.57 Salmon 9 . . 1.41 1.43 1.70 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... 1.29 1.43 APPENDIX F 287 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued W-l-E Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9^ 7 8 New York Apples 10 9 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 7 8 String Beans 12 15 16 Cider 9y 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 ' 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9% 3 7 Michigan Pumpkin 9 T / 2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 9 12 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes llj^2 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 W-2-E Michigan Apples 9y 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 21 22 Pennsylvania Apples 10 7 8 String Beans 12 22 32 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^2 7 10 Michigan Pumpkin 9^2 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 2 4 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes llj^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 40 Body 1.63 1.30 1.28 1.68 1.60 1.42 1.24 1.37 2.00 1.56 1.70 1.54 1.46 1.40 .98 1.80 1.71 1.78 1.55 1.10 1.98 1.96 1.83 1.87 1.64 1.41 Pounds per Base Box - Top 1.75 1.58 1.76 1.34 1.37 1.66 2.04 1.67 1.56 1.86 1.68 1.62 1.73 1.53 1.75 1.64 1.44 1.54 1.50 1.86 1.46 1.56 1.38 1.50 2.00 1.74 1.68 Bottom 1.75 1.60 1.14 1.94 1.49 1.67 1.95 1.76 1.51 1.35 1.47 1.65 1.91 1.03 1.52 1.41 1.67 1.95 1.55 2.12 1.46 1.63 1.33 1.47 1.75 1.41 1.68 1.22 1.95 1.53 1.59 1.83 1.58 1.29 1.28 1.34 1.42 1.64 1.59 1.55 1.92 1.73 1.84 1.55 1.64 1.55 1.61 1.45 1.34 1.73 1.72 1.62 1.53 1.55 1.54 1.80 1.68 1.67 2.08 1.72 1.59 1.85 1.72 1.68 1.89 1.73 1.13 1.34 1.39 1.28 1.48 1.50 1.33 1.50 1.67 1.26 1.53 1.38 1.63 1.37 1.62 1.58 1.51 1.69 1.64 1.73 1.63 1.48 1.78 1.55 1.53 1.70 1.75 1.57 1.73 1.93 1.47 1.76 1.78 1.48 1.70 1.85 1.52 1.70 1.65 1.60 1.43 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916— Continued X-l-E Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9^ 7 8 New York Apples 10 10 13 Pennsylvania Apples 10 7 12 String Beans 12 25 26 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10y 2 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 2 l / 2 2 9 Michigan Pumpkin 9y 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 1 2 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^2 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 9 X-3-E Michigan Apples 9y 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 12 16 Pennsylvania Apples 10 13 15 String Beans 12 3 22 Cider 9 J / 2 9 10 Clam Juice wy 2 13 14 Condensed Milk .13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9y 7 12 Michigan Pumpkin 4 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11/4 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 9 Y-4-E Michigan Apples 9 J / 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 15 18 Pennsylvania Apples 10 8 9 String Beans 12 23 • 24 Cider 9y 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10}4 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 t Illinois Pumpkin 9^4 9 10 Michigan Pumpkin 9^4 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 9 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^4 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11 J^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish , 11 10 Body 1.48 1.49 1.37 1.39 1.57 1.38 1.74 1.43 1.72 1.66 1.72 1.83 1.53 1.37 1.53 1.56 1.37 1.75 1.74 1.58 1.43 1.52 1.64 1.83 1.68 1.63 Pounds per Base Box Top 1.77 1.85 1.97 1.96 1.77 1.69 1.87 1.93 1.71 1.70 1.72 1.90 1.76 1.37 1.35 1.14 1.35 1.65 1.72 1.63 1.95 1.68 1.64 1.83 1.83 2.04 1.63 Bottom 1.68 2.15 1.45 1.77 1.73 1.65 1.46 1.45 1.66 1.80 1.58 1.81 1.80 1.20 1.18 1.42 1.65 1.56 1.84 1.83 1.89 1.58 1.70 1.72 1.60 1.65 1.48 1.54 1.50 1.58 1.78 1.74 1.79 1.48 1.86 1.64 1.59 1.74 1.65 1.58 1.66 1.60 1.54 1.95 1.56 1.69 1.47 1.37 1.40 1.40 1.50 1.69 1.95 1.66 1.66 1.59 1.76 1.90 1.75 1.69 1.75 2.03 1.67 1.66 1.83 1.98 1.10 1.12 1.44 1.27 1.13 1.35 1.38 1.21 1.22 1.27 1.21 1.49 1.62 1.48 1.74 1.82 1.48 1.84 1.77 1.53 1.58 1.48 1.53 2.05 1.34 1.68 1.73 1.48 1.69 2.04 1.73 1.37 2.00 1.57 1.62 1.45 1.74 1.65 1.79 1.68 1.41 290 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916— Continued Z-l-E Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9*^ 7 8 New York Apples 10 21 24 Pennsylvania Apples 10 12 13 String Beans 12 2 16 Cider . . . .• 9 J / 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10y 2 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^2 9 10 Michigan Pumpkin 9}4 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 3 4 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11 J^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 1.78 1.85 1.68 1.63 1.62 1.55 1.58 1.37 1.73 1.47 1.73 1.43 1.78 1.68 1.59 1.49 1.63 2.02 1.52 1.60 1.54 1.63 1.37 1.56 1.47 1.78 2.04 1.67 1.97 1.68 1.70 1.79 1.64 1.89 1.75 1.54 1.68 1.63 1.76 1.17 1.42 1.28 1.25 1.42 1.22 1.11 1.42 1.80 1.47 1.26 1.62 1.62 1.79 1.72 1.64 1.67 1.90 1.38 1.68 1.68 1.74 1.97 1.57 1.54 1.83 1.78 1.81 1.72 1.70 1.46 1.65 1.74 1.48 1.83 1.59 1.67 1.80 1.86 1.76 1.74 APPENDIX F 291 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916— Continued W-l-F Age , Pounds per Base Box N Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples , 9>4 7 1.73 2.10 1.75 8 1.46 2.37 2.38 New York Apples 10 4 1.78 1.78 1.78 5 1.74 1.50 1.98 Pennsylvania Apples 10 12 1.45 1.88 2.08 21 1.78 1.97 1.78 String Beans 12 21 1.83 1.61 1.93 22 1.55 1.51 2.11 Cider 9^ 9 2.16 2.16 1.90 10 1.55 1.55 2.10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 1.64 1.74 1.82 14 1.86 1.45 1.74 Condensed Milk 13 9 1.53 1.95 1.60 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ 7 1.76 2.41 2.66 12 1.52 1.74 1.20 Michigan Pumpkin 9j/ 2 9 1.44 1.85 2.10 10 1.95 1.35 1.88 New York Pumpkin 10 9 1.95 1.71 1.88 12 2.14 2.28 1.80 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 1.59 2.35 2.13 10 2.08 2.47 2.28 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 2.08 1.95 1.83 10 1.67 1.98 2.65 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 1.53 2.68 2.00 10 2.05 2.52 1.45 Salmon 9 . . 2.04 1.55 1.83 Tuna Fish 11 41 ... 1.83 2.12 W-2-F Michigan Apples 9j4 7 8 New York Apples 10 4 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 10 12 String Beans 12 12 21 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ 2 11 Michigan Pumpkin 9^ 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 2 3 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^2 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... 1.89 1.96 1.59 1.59 1.93 1.59 2.08 1.53 1.87 1.78 1.89 1.53 1.78 1.63 &./Q/6 1.90 2.17 1.68 1.83 Lost 1.99 1.72 1.78 1.86 2.43 1.83 1.76 1.96 2.01 1.71 2.14 1.83 2.02 1.65 2.12 1.82 1.87 1.60 3.35 1.87 2.00 1.65 1.92 1.94 1.77 1.61 1.52 1.67 1.46 1.64 1.50 2.05 2.02 1.72 2.18 1.97 2.08 1.81 2.04 2.10 1.73 1.80 2.08 2.46 2.35 2.12 2.48 1.73 1.68 1.83 1.67 2.12 2.12 2.18 2.35 2.22 2.22 1.76 2.36 2.63 292 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued X-l-F Age r_ — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Michigan Apples 9^2 New York Apples 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 String Beans 12 Cider 9^ Clam Juice 10*2 Condensed Milk 13 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ Michigan Pumpkin 9^2 New York Pumpkin 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ New Jersey Tomatoes W/i Salmon ' 9 Tuna Fish 11 Lost . . . Lost Lost X-3-F Michigan Apples '. . . . . 9y New York Apples 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 String Beans 12 Cider 9 1 /. Clam Juice 10y 2 Condensed Milk 13 Illinois Pumpkin 9^2 Michigan Pumpkin 9^2 New York Pumpkin 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 Maryland Tomatoes HJ/2 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^4 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... 1.96 2.80 in No. Body Top Bottom 7 1.50 1.87 1.90 8 1.65 1.78 2.04 7 1.83 1.93 1.80 10 1.83 1.78 1.78 5 1.73 1.76 1.85 8 1.68 2.07 1.65 31 1.90 1.74 1.82 32 1.77 1.62 1.74 9 1.75 1.62 2.25 10 1.94 1.67 1.71 13 1.97 2.04 1.87 14 1.67 1.94 1.78 9 1.83 1.81 1.93 ii 1.49 1.61 1.68 12 1.53 1.53 1.60 9 1.56 1.93 1.63 10 1.51 1.60 1.98 3 1.80 2.28 1.66 4 1.62 1.60 1.89 9 1.78 1.92 1.72 10 2.37 1.74 2.00 9 1.98 2.03 2.04 10 1.87 1.72 1.67 9 1.33 2.24 1.95 10 2.25 1.87 1.74 1.63 1.90 1.77 '2 7 1.53 1.89 2.17 8 2.35 1.82 2.14 12 1.57 1.88 1.93 14 1.49 1.97 1.98 2 1.63 2.19 1.93 10 1.56 1.46 1.82 22 1.71 1.69 1.72 23 1.77 1.87 1.61 9 1.86 2.30 1.85 10 1.81 1.82 2.40 13 2.02 1.67 1.81 14 1.81 1.91 2.17 9 1.78 2.18 • 1.88 1 1.24 1.68 1.66 3 1.21 1.54 1.52 9 1.60 1.53 1.54 10 1.50 1.35 1.62 4 1.97 1.48 1.57 12 1.69 1.85 1.92 9 2.34 1.93 1.98 10 1.98 2.13 2.38 9 1.76 1.83 1.78 10 1.68 2.07 2.03 9 1.83 1.50 1.45 10 1.65 1.57 1.85 1.84 1.84 2.11 APPENDIX F 293 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916— Continued Y-l-F Age Article Months Michigan Apples 9 z /2 New York Apples 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 String Beans 12 Cider 9y 2 Clam Juice 10^ Condensed Milk 13 Illinois Pumpkin 9J/2 Michigan Pumpkin 9y 2 New York Pumpkin . . 10 Indiana Tomatoes 1-. Maryland Tomatoes 11^ New Jersey Tomatoes 11 J^ Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 Y-4-F Michigan Apples 9 l / 2 New York Apples 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 String Beans 12 Cider 9y 2 Clam Juice 10^ Condensed Milk 13 Illinois Pumpkin 9^4 Michigan Pumpkin 9}4 New York Pumpkin 10 Indiana Tomatoes .11 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ New Jersey Tomatoes 11/4 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 /—— Pounds per Base Box , Can No. Body Top Bottom 7 1.45 1.89 1.98 8 2.02 2.22 2.00 23 1.83 2.07 1.87 24 1.28 2.25 1.93 11 1.66 1.73 Lost 16 1.84 2.03 1.93 15 2.06 1.79 1.93 16 2.08 2.12 1.66 9 2.46 1.92 2.09 10 1.61 2.03 2.03 13 1.62 1.95 1.97 14 2.02 1.83 1.85 9 1.41 1.96 2.05 3 2.12 1.54 1.67 4 1.43 1.55 1.47 9 1.82 1.79 1.84 10 2.56 1.68 1.65 9 1.92 1.90 2.52 10 1.80 1.90 2.11 9 2.42 1.83 2.28 10 2.12 2.13 1.93 9 1.67 2.34 2.03 10 2.08 1.83 1.83 9 2.12 1.93 1.89 10 1.95 2.12 2.05 . . 1.55 2.28 2.06 10 1.80 1.92 7 • 1.80 1.83 1.76 8 1.85 1.83 1.78 15 1.87 1.60 2.04 18 2.00 1.75 1.53 12 1.97 2.05 1.85 16 1.60 2.00 1.83 25 1.50 2.33 2.07 34 1.48 2.46 1.89 9 2.09 1.93 2.01 10 1.53 1.91 1.97 13 2.00 2.10 1.97 14 1.62 1.89 2.21 9 2.12 1.86 1.98 5 1.72 1.52 1.41 12 1.25 2.00 1.53 9 1.84 1.36 1.60 10 1.64 1.72 1.85 1 1.38 1.87 1.72 9 1.89 2.22 2.00 9 1.98 2.05 2.53 10 1.98 1.52 1.85 9 1.53 1.78 1.86 10 1.56 2.02 2.10 9 1.83 1.83 2.47 10 2.02 1.92 2.15 . . 1.70 2.14 2.28 10 2.12 2.65 294 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916— Continued Z-l-F Age , Pounds per Base Box \ Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 9^ 7 1.85 1.93 1.87 8 1.87 1.82 1.85 New York Apples 10 13 1.90 1.68 1.75 18 1.45 1.84 1.65 Pennsylvania Apples 10 8 1.63 1.74 1.73 9 1.92 1.95 2.90 String Beans 12 13 1.35 1.59 2.11 14 1.58 1.90 2.02 Cider 9^ 9 1.61 1.90 2.27 10 1.90 2.22 1.84 Clam Juice 10>^ 13 1.92 1.88 2.06 14 1.55 1.69 2.08 Condensed Milk 13 9 2.28 1.83 1.95 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ 1 1.23 1.89 1.78 2 1.72 1.58 1.50 Michigan Pumpkin 9^ 9 1.73 1.67 1.58 10 1.35 1.59 1.62 New York Pumpkin 10 1 1.92 2.18 1.68 9 2.26 1.66 2.29 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 1.93 1.83 1.73 10 2.38 1.75 1.65 Maryland Tomatoes 11 J^ 9 2.12 1.83 2.10 10 1.38 1.87 2.04 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^ 9 1.88 1.78 1.51 10 1.78 2.00 2.22 Salmon 9 . . 2.24 1.84 1.97 Tuna Fish 11 10 ... 1.93 1.84 APPENDIX F 295 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued , W-l-G 6 9 9 20 13 14 9 10 13 14 9 5 9 9 10 2 3 9 10 9 10 9 10 37 Age Article Months Can No Michigan Apples 9»>4 7 New York Apples 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 String Beans 12 Cider \... 9y 2 Clam Juice 10^ Condensed Milk., 13 Illinois Pumpkin 9j4 Michigan Pumpkin 9j4 New York Pumpkin 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 Maryland Tomatoes 11/^ New Jersey Tomatoes 11^2 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 W-2-G Michigan Apples 9^ New York Apples 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 String Beans 12 Cider $y 2 Clam Juice 10^ Condensed Milk. 13 Illinois Pumpkin 9^2 Michigan Pumpkin 9^2 New York Pumpkin 10 Indiana Tomatoes 11 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ New Jersey Tomatoes 11^2 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 Body 3.79 2.73 3.35 2.27 2.75 2.59 2.36 3.32 /O./i/i 2.46 3.30 2.63 2.08 2.85 2.13 2.18 2.13 2.23 2.67 2.57 2.14 5.68 4.85 2.63 2.58 4.95 Pounds per Base Box Top 3.48 2.56 2.66 2.51 3.02 2.65 2.81 2.61 3.21 2.41 3.20 3.36 2.05 2.59 2.59 2.35 2.38 2.79 2.94 3.52 2.68 3.57 2.63 2.68 3.43 3.12 3.80 Bottom 5.60 2.83 3.93 3.28 2.88 3.38 2.34 2.40 2.51 3.01 3.19 2.29 2.53 2.88 2.23 2.28 2.25 2.50 2.78 2.78 2.74 2.62 2.84 2.80 2.63 3.02 2.70 7 2.88 2.44 3.12 8 4.90 4.50 3.65 16 2.63 2.43 2.87 71 2.58 2.83 3.53 15 2.78 3.18 2.86 16 2.34 3.00 Lost 35 2.56 2.88 3.36 36 3.17 2.97 3.14 9 2.51 2.70 3.16 10 2.88 2.73 3.01 13 2.43 2.59 2.43 14 2.49 4.49 3.24 9 2.54 2.88 2.53 4 1.90 3.40 2.12 7 3.14 2.52 2.92 9 1.87 2.38 2.27 10 3.10 2.50 2.83 1 3.64 2.53 2.94 4 3.14 2.95 2.95 9 2.63 3.13 2.75 10 2.63 3.34 2.95 9 3.08 4.27 3.62 10 3.52 2.63 2.78 9 2.78 2.60 2.95 10 2.98 2.48 2.60 2.37 3.17 2.97 2.60 2.55 296 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued X-l-G < Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9y 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 7 10 Pennsylvania Apples 10 15 16 String Beans 12 33 34 Cider 9y 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10y 2 13 11 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9y 2 3 9 Michigan Pumpkin 9y> 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 10 11 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^2 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes ll/^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 9 X-3-G Michigan Apples 9y 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 7 12 Pennsylvania Apples 10 8 11 String Beans 12 37 38 Cider 9^ 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9y 2 4 Michigan Pumpkin 9*4 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 1 3 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11 y 2 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^2 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 Body 1.77 2.34 2.08 2.27 1.98 5.48 2.66 2.68 3.63 2.06 2.61 4.08 2.12 2.10 1.83 2.26 2.32 2.18 1.97 4.46 3.08 2.47 2.38 2.10 2.24 6.23 Pounds per Base Box Top 2.70 2.68 3.38 2.58 2.98 5.67 2.79 3.19 3.30 2.72 2.59 2.70 3.18 2.95 3.09 2.36 2.63 2.47 2.96 2.89 3.04 4.30 4.45 2.63 4.90 3.05 2.05 Bottom 2.38 3.02 2.58 2.71 2.74 3.35 3.02 3.08 2.62 2.46 3.14 2.46 2.98 2.11 2.59 2.11 2.52 3.04 2.43 2.43 2.64 Lost 2.93 2.63 2.68 2.66 2.05 2.24 3.15 2.49 2.43 2.85 2.43 2.68 3.24 2.66 1.97 2.83 2.83 2.63 2.91 3.28 2.87 2.90 2.63 2.65 2.36 2.36 2.14 2.75 2.69 2.04 2.48 2.58 5.71 3.05 2.51 3.79 3.44 2.68 2.78 2.50 2.41 4.00 2.85 2.85 1.97 2.19 2.91 4.81 2.82 2.62 2.07 2.85 3.34 3.14 1.92 4.15 2.28 2.83 3.14 2.25 2.47 2.35 2.52 5.33 2.83 1.98 2.96 2.84 4.08 4.30 3.13 2.18 2.87 2.63 2.13 2.60 2.50 3.35 2.54 2.55 2.42 3.13 3.47 2.62 3.23 APPENDIX F 297 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Y-l-G Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9}i 7 8 New York Apples 10 23 24 Pennsylvania Apples 10 11 12 String Beans 12 21 22 Cider 9y 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 • 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^4 2 11 Michigan Pumpkin 9^ 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 7 11 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes. 11^2 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 Lost Y-4-G Michigan Apples 9y 2 7 8 New York Apples 10 15 18 Pennsylvania Apples 10 11 12 String Beans 12 3 41 Cider 9y 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10J4 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 #9 Illinois Pumpkin 9^ 2 9 Michigan Pumpkin 9^ 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 4 12 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes 11^4 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 io Body 2.40 2.25 2.45 2.40 2.48 2.82 2.66 4.03 2.65 2.36 3.44 2.80 2.23 2.03 2.17 1.93 1.85 2.41 3.07 2.02 2.63 2.45 3.13 2.18 2.73 2.31 Pounds per Base Box Top 2.91 2.03 3.08 2.63 2.25 2.24 2.46 2.68 3.24 2.39 2.99 2.92 2.53 2.03 2.01 2.56 2.58 2.76 3.00 2.83 2.83 2.46 2.73 2.78 3.03 3.42 Lost Bottom 2.98 2.78 2.33 3.35 2.85 2.35 2.43 3.24 2.80 2.65 3.57 3.37 3.43 2.55 2.49 2.42 2.17 2.63 2.63 2.78 2.78 3.20 3.26 2.68 2.63 2.50 Lost 2.42 2.88 3.12 2.68 2.89 2.63 2.83 2.98 3.32 3.86 3.28 3.14 2.78 1.65 2.63 2.77 3.23 2.55 2.27 2.70 2.59 2.19 2.59 3.24 2.38 2.46 2.87 2.52 2.42 2.80 2.63 2.89 2.58 2.33 2.77 3.14 4.09 2.68 2.83 2.37 3.03 2.53 2.56 2.33 2.20 2.55 3.12 2.53 2.29 2.63 2.58 2.66 3.17 3.32 2.69 2.61 2.86 5.38 2.35 2.68 2.82 3.22 3.18 2.57 2.60 2.78 3.35 3.14 3.38 2.63 2.56 2.92 2.42 5.00 2.96 3.34 2.75 2.09 2.35 2.86 298 APPENDIX * WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Z-l-G Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 9^ 7 8 New York Apples 10 13 16 Pennsylvania Apples 10 4 5 String Beans 12 11 13 Cider 9 J / 2 9 10 Clam Juice 10^ 13 14 Condensed Milk 13 9 Illinois Pumpkin 9y 2 3 4 Michigan Pumpkin 9J4 9 10 New York Pumpkin 10 3 4 Indiana Tomatoes 11 9 10 Maryland Tomatoes 11^ 9 10 New Jersey Tomatoes llj^ 9 10 Salmon 9 Tuna Fish 11 10 , Pounds Body 2.54 per Base Top 2.93 Box x Bottom 5.33 3.74 2.78 2.84 2.34 2.27 3.49 2.35 2.63 2.10 2.18 2.55 2.35 2.24 2.27 4.84 2.17 2.50 2.51 2.45 2.43 2.43 2.24 2.90 3.32 3.38 2.55 2.45 2.87 2.73 3.09 2.75 2.63 2.91 2.93 2.48 2.87 2.48 2.43 2.42 1.93 2.18 2.24 2.08 2.94 4.76 2.31 2.23 3.34 2.25 2.44 2.61 2.64 2.45 2.75 2.45 3.74 4.57 Lost 2.68 2.70 2.22 2.90 2.62 2.53 2.65 2.53 3.07 2.55 2.34 2.65 3.18 2.60 3.13 3.39 2.69 2.85 2.73 APPENDIX F 299 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 W-l-A Age £- — Pounds per Base Box N Article Months Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11/^ Pennsylvania Apples llj^ String Beans 13^ Cider 11 Clam Juice . . 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^4 Indiana Tomatoes 12^4 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 W-2-A Miohigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11^ Pennsylvania Apples . . 11^2 String Beans 13 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11 J^ Indiana Tomatoes 12^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 an No. Body Top Bottom 9 .72 .85 .67 10 .59 .73 .66 9 .71 .73 .61 10 .70 .61 1.62 9 .72 .85 .79 13 .59 .81 .87 26 .78 .82 .98 30 .90 .90 .75 9 .55 .65 .67 10 .88 .60 .79 14 .85 .78 .83 15 .91 1.02 .88 •5 .64 .56 .57 9 .48 .56 .67 11 .61 .67 .6,8 12 .66 .63 .68 1 .80 .78 .75 5 .68 .74 .77 11 .76 .90 .75 12 .77 .75 .82 11 .98' .85 .88 12 .82 .92 .78 11 .75 .70 .78 12 .70 .81 .90 9 .73 .60 .70 10 .57 .73 .67 7 .52 .58 .64 8 .69 .61 .65 5 .67 .59 .70 13 .63 .82 .76 15 .70 .90 .75 16 .80 .75 .90 9 .58 .81 .81 10 .60 .76 .82 14 .73 .90 .85 15 .85 .70 1.10 2 .44 .53 .62 3 .44 .47 .55 11 .51 .56 .94 12 .50 .66 .59 3 .70 .67 .72 11 .61 .66 .56 11 .70 .75 .82 12 .70 1.28 .90 11 .70 .85 .80 12 .65 .82 .72 11 .61 .98 .82 12 .68 .92 .83 300 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916— Continued X-l-A Age Article Months Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples liy 2 Pennsylvania Apples 11^2 String Beans 13^ Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^ Indiana Tomatoes 12*/2 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 X-3-A Pounds per Base Box Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11^ Pennsylvania Apples 11/4 String Beans 13^ Cider •. 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin liy 2 Indiana Tomatoes 12^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 Jan No. Body Top Bottom 9 .61 .73 .71 10 .64 .66 1.84 3 .65 .58 .58 5 .56 .64 .59 7 .58 .62 .75 12 .66 .65 .70 25 .75 .75 .75 35 .60 .82 .82 9 .63 .51 .58 10 .70 .61 .85 14 .75 .85 .77 15 .72 .75 .81 2 .59 .53 .57 3 .48 .59 .58 11 .56 .56 .56 12 .52 .65 .56 3 .61 .69 .74 6 .74 .88 .67 11 .75 .65 .80 12 .70 .72 .72 11 .83 .70 .75 12 .85 .76 .76 11 .70 .85 .87 12 .71 .86 .83 9 .64 .72 .70 10 .77 .69 .73 16 .70 .74 .62 22 .71 .78 .61 7 .79 .79 .79 10 .73 .76 .69 13 .75 .87 .75 11 . t l .77 .87 9 .85 .88 .75 10 .80 .87 .78 14 .88 .75 .73 15 .83 .80 .90 5 .48 .53 .57 12 .67 .53 .59 11 .70 .66 .56 12 .66 .59 .63 8 .73 .55 .56 11 .63 .71 .75 11 .60 .81 .75 12 .87 .81 .81 11 .95 .75 .70 12 1.05 .65 .80 11 .83 .98 .87 12 .90 .88 .78 APPENDIX F 301 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Y-l-A Age f-_ — Pounds per Base Box — ^ Article Months Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11] Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans 13 J^ Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin liy 2 Indiana Tomatoes 12^' Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 Y-4-A an No. Body Top Bottom 9 .60 .75 .69 10 .61 .75 .70 1 .64 .72 .61 2 .64 .63 .54 7 .67 .77 .76 10 .78 .80 .70 9 .75 .78 .80 11 .82 .78 .71 9 M .75 .66 10 1.00 .73 .81 14 .73 .78 .93 15 .87 .87 .90 8 .68 .62 .52 10 .56 .49 .67 11 .56 .56 .71 12 .55 .53 .62 4 .67 .73 .68 6 .51 .79 .62 11 .70 .78 .73 12 .65 .74 .85 11 . ■ .68 .65 .78 12 .95 .63 .75 11 .81 .76 .80 12 .67 .78 .78 9 .55 .69 .59 10 .61 .81 .72 10 .74 .74 .76 11 .72 .77 .76 11 .77 .83 .76 12 .67 .80 .73 21 .75 ■ .92 .65 22 .80 .88 .80 9 .56 .72 .75 10 .65 .58 .70 14 .81 .80 .84 15 .85 .85 .95 7 .59 .69 .57 11 .57 .61 .72 11 .45 .67 .61 12 .49 .58 .71 3 .78 .80 .80 12 .81 .86 .85 11 .83 .68 .95 12 .70 .80 .88 11 .80 .87 .81 12 .75 .65 .86 11 .73 .95 .82 12 .68 .75 1.00 Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11>4 Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans 13^ Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^2 Indiana Tomatoes 12^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 302 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916— Continued Z-l-A Article Months Michigan Apples , 11 New York Apples 11^2 Pennsylvania Apples 11 Yz String Beans 13^4 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin llj^ Indiana Tomatoes 12^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 , Pounds per Base Box \ Can No. Body Top Bottom 9 M .60 .67 10 .61 .73 .70 1 .51 .59 .60 2 .56 .56 .85 19 .70 .65 .65 23 .71 .88 .58 9 .90 .70 .86 10 .90 .76 .88 14 .85 .75 .87 15 .78 1.08 .65 5 .54 .64 .56 8 .57 .56 .59 11 .53 .90 .70 12 .56 .60 .71 2 .70 .73 .84 6 .75 .69 .72 11 .70 .65 .67 12 .75 .87 .76 11 .85 .68 .75 12 .80 .78 .88 11 .90 .95 .76 12 .78 .68 .71 APPENDIX F 303 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued W-l-B Age , Pounds per Base Box s Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 11 9 .81 .93 .94 10 .85 .98 .95 New York Apples 11J4 13 .78 .78 .84 22 .72 .95 .64 Pennsylvania Apples 11}£ 3 .70 .85 .77 4 .75 .84 .94 String Beans 13^ 2 .65 1.05 .92 9 1.00 1.02 1.05 Cider 11 9 .65 .81 .90 10 .87 .70 .94 Clam Juice 12 14 1.20 1.24 1.08 • 15 1.15 1.08 1.10 Illinois Pumpkin 11 9 .71 .73 .85 10 .61 .87 .63 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 .71 .86 .85 12 .70 .98 .83 New York Pumpkin W/z 7 .77 .91 .87 11 .85 .85 .81 Indiana Tomatoes 12>4 11 1.03 .93 .92 12 .81 ..87 .87 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 .60 .72 1.03 12 .85 .78 1.08 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 .88 .95 .95 12 .95 1.10 .85 W-2-B Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11J4 Pennsylvania Apples 11^2 String Beans 13^ Cider 11 Clam Juice _ 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^ Indiana Tomatoes 12^2 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 9 10 6 11 9 10 22 23 9 10 14 15 7 8 11 12 8 11 11 12 11 12 11 12 .84 .81 .84 .81 .75 .89 1.15 1.40 .92 1.09 1.05 .96 .56 .57 .82 .48 .73 .90 .88 .85 .90 1.07 .70 .86 .90 .90 1.02 .92 .96 .84 .95 1.05 .88 .90 1.03 .98 .69 .56 .73 .90 .89 .96 .85 .83 1.15 1.03 .86 .90 .96 .94 .95 .77 .93 .84 .70 .96 .95 .88 .92 .85 .55 .55 .78 .81 .87 .75 .90 1.05 .98 1.05 1.08 .98 304 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916— Continued X-l-B Age r — Pounds per Base Box- Article Months Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples H/4 Pennsylvania Apples 11/4 String Beans 13^ Cider H Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 12^2 Indiana Tomatoes 12J4 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 X-3-B Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples \V/ 2 Pennsylvania Apples 11 ^ String Beans 13^ Cider : 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin W/z Indiana Tomatoes 12J^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 in No. Body Top Bottom 9 .77 .97 1.05 10 .77 .85 1.12 6 .76 1.13 .75 7 .85 .87 .85 11 .79 .82 1.07 12 .80 .88 1.00 3 .97 .98 .82 20 .85 .88 .85 9 .92 .96 1.02 10 .79 .95 .95 14 1.15 1.10 .90 15 .90 1.02 1.10 3 .66 .71 .79 4 .79 .76 .77 11 .61 .74 .74 12 .68 .79 .83 7 .97 .88 .92 8 .88 .97 .77 11 .81 .93 1.06 12 .90 1.03 .90 11 .90 1.03 1.10 12 1.05 1.10 1.08 11 1.08 .97 1.08 13 .91 .95 1.11 9 .78 .93 .78 10 .75 .90 1.03 17 .90 .81 .99 22 .89 .88 1.02 15 .91 1.06 1.05 18 .98 1.06 1.01 26 1.02 1.05 .97 30 .75 .92 .92 9 .93 .87 .82 10 .95 1.05 1..02 14 1.05 1.12 1.18 15 1.00 1.20 1.10 11 .86 .80 .70 12 . .64 .82 .86 11 .81 .87 .69 12 .97 .80 .86 2 .93 .95 .93 6 1.46 .94 .94 11 .98 .98 .92 12 1.05 .95 1.03 11 .78 1.05 .98 12 1.05 1.28 ' 1.10 11 .98 .85 1.12 12 .72 1.05 1.10 APPENDIX F 305 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Y-l-B Pounds per Base Box Age Article Months Can No. Body Top Michigan Apples 11 9 .75 .87 10 .85 1.10 New York Apples liy 2 3 .65 1.03 4 .87 1.08 Pennsylvania Apples . liy 2 13 .87 .97 11 .72 1.08 String Beans lSy 2 24 .80 1.20 28 .88 1.06 Cider 11 9' .75 1.03 10 .90 1.08 Clam Juice 12 14 1.20 .76 ' 15 .98 1.15 Illinois Pumpkin 11 9 .54 .86 10 .66 .66 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 .60 .82 12 .76 1.07 New York Pumpkin 11^ 2 .88 .94 3 .91 1.02 Indiana Tomatoes 12}/2 11 1.15 1.26 12 1.00 1.25 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 .70 1.08 12 1.03 1.20 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 .83 1.05 12 .97 1.20 Y-4-B Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11>£ Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans 133^ Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^2 Indiana Tomatoes 12J4 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 9 10 1 2 5 16 45 46 9 10 14 15 6 9 11 12 3 4 11 12 11 12 11 12 .99 .83 .99 .96 .82 1.06 .88 • .82 .88 .88 .95 .67 .57 .77 .88 .91 .78 .87 .75 .95 1.00 1.00 1.12 .85 1.02 .85 .95 .98 .90 .78 1.00 .85 .84 1.20 1.07 .68 .81 .70 .85 .89 .86 1.00 1.05 .98 .72 1.03 .98 Bottom .95 1.10 .92 .86 .86 .97 1.00 1.05 .85 .95 1.10 1.32 .84 .82 .82 1.02 1.02 1.07 1.08 1.42 1.15 1.10 1.03 .92 1.00 .86 .92 .90 .99 .95 .78 .95 1.03 .87 1.00 1.15 .63 .75 .98 .79 .82 1.00 1.12 1.00 1.08 .98 .92 .98 306 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916— Continued Z-l-B Age r — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 11 9 10 New York Apples llj^ 7 11 Pennsylvania Apples llj^ • String Beans 13^2 15 23 Cider 11 9 10 Clam Juice 12 14 15 Illinois Pumpkin 11 1 2 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 12 New York Pumpkin liy 2 3 12 Indiana Tomatoes 12^ 11 12 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 12 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 12 Body Top Bottom .54 1.02 .92 .86 .93 1.08 .75 1.03 .94 .80 1.00 1.04 1.12 1.01 1.06 1.13 .82 1.06 1.15 - .98 .94 1.12 1.10 .96 1.10 1.15 1.12 1.00 1.18 1.06 .77 .62 .83 .60 .71 .76 .79 .79 1.05 .87 .84 1.02 .91 1.02 .97 .98 1.21 .S7 1.03 .85 1.17 1.23 1.10 .75 1.08 1.05 1.05 1.10 1.00 .88 1.13 1.15 1.15 1.08 .98 1.12 APPENDIX F 307 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916— Continued W-l-C Age Article Months Can No. Body Michigan Apples 11 9 .99 10 1.14 New York Apples H/2 2 .72 20 1.13 Pennsylvania Apples 11J4 13 1.39 16 1.09 String Beans 13^ 43 1.08 44 1.00 Cider 11 9 1-30 10 1.20 Clam Juice 12 ' 14 1.30 15 1.20 Illinois Pumpkin 11 5 .57 6 .94 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 .98 12 .89 New York Pumpkin . . .'. 11^ 7 1.07 10 1.12 Indiana Tomatoes 12^4 11 1.25 12 1.55 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 1.16 12 1.15 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 .95 12 1.28 W-2-C Pounds per Base Box Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples ' 11^ Pennsylvania Apples 11/^ String Beans 13^ Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^2' Indiana Tomatoes 12^2 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 12 11 12 11 12 1.08 1.02 1.02 1.08 1.30 1.00 Top 1.17 1.22 1.07 1.11 1.06 1.08 1.30 1.05 1.13 1.12 1.06 1.31 .97 .97 .93 .88 1.47 1.00 1.50 1.05 .95 1.22 1.20 1.15 Bottom 1.08 1.02 .85 .74 1.20 .94 1.18 1.25 1.05 .98 1.20 1.36 .88 .69 .73 .93 .91 1.12 1.12 1.13 1.03 1.10 .88 1.20 9 1.06 1.04 1.09 10 .94 1.19 1.22 3 1.06 1.08 1.05 6 .99 .99 1.15 9 .84 1.09 1.12 12 1.02 1.06 1.29 13 1.30 1.06 .95 14 1.16 1.16 1.22 9 .95 1.12 1.00 10 1.00 .96 1.08 14 1.22 1.20 1.25 15 1.18 1.35 1.18 7 .79 1.03 .86 8 .72 .91 .73 11 .71 .89 .97 12 .85 .90 .88 9 .98 .82 1.08 12 1.00 .95 .96 1.22 1.05 1.48 1.15 1.18 1.40 .97 1.22 .95 1.16 1.22 .96 308 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916— Continued X-l-C Article Months Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11^ Pennsylvania Apples 11/-4 String Beans 13^ Cider H Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^2 Indiana Tomatoes 1254 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 X-3-C , Pounds per Base Box x Can No. Body Top Bottom 9 1.32 1.07 1.23 10 • .86 1.23 1.02 7 1.10 1.05 1.19 18 .88 .94 1.03 13 1.18 1.17 1.24 14 1.18 1.26 1.05 29 1.15 1.26 1.12 35 .92 1.12 .96 9 1.03 1.08 1.43 10 .98 1.05 1.21 14 1.03 1.07 1.26 15 1.08 1.28 1.28 7 1.01 .88 .78 8 .71 .71 .83 11 .98 1.10 1.07 12 M .88 1.03 3 .85 .95 1.09 8 1.12 1.26 1.18 11 1.03 1.12 1.18 12 1.15 1.03 1.35 11 1.35 1.20 1.12 12 1.20 1.28 1.35 11 1.05 .98 1.26 12 1.05 1.20 1.36 9 1.03 1.09 .93 10 .81 1.07 1.23 20 1.14 1.05 1.42 21 1.03 ■ .95 1.27 11 .88 1.01 1.24 12 1.18 1.00 1.24 25 .82 1.07 .97 26 1.03 1.08 1.28 9 .95 1.25 1.26 10 1.35 1.20 1.27 14 1.06 1.40 1.50 15 .93 1.30 1.08 1 .85 .82 .82 5 .64 .84 .89 11 .99 1.02 .88 12 .86 .88 .95 8 .93 1.07 1.04 11 .89 1.03 .83 11 1.06 1.35 1.50 • 12 1.05 1.22 1.10 11 1.08 1.08 1.15 12 1.09 1.25 1.08 11 1.00 1.38 1.26 12 1.02 1.36 1.43 Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11^2 Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans 13^4 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^4 Indiana Tomatoes 12^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 APPENDIX F 309 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued ' Y-l-C Age Article Months Can No. Body Michigan Apples 11 9 .81 10 .84 New York Apples 11^ 1 .94 2 1.10 Pennsylvania Apples 11 Yz 7 1.04 8 .94 String Beans 13 j£ 27 .92 28 1.20 Cider 11 9 .96 10 .95 Clam Juice 12 . 14 1.25 15 1.21 Illinois Pumpkin 11 7 .64 8 .66 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 .88 12 .87 New York Pumpkin \V/ 2 3 .95 11 1.00 Indiana Tomatoes 12J4 11 1.05 12 1.06 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 1.28 12 .92 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 1.16 12 1.18 Y-4-C Pounds per Base Box Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11^ Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans , 13^4 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 113^ Indiana Tomatoes 12J^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 9 10 1 2 12 13 9 11 9 10 14 15 10 12 11 12 6 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 1.19 1.08 1.07 .87 1.41 1.23 1.25 1.05 1.03 .88 1.30 1.45 .72 .86 .83 .95 1.04 1.06 1.08 .98 1.15 1.38 1.11 1.16 Top 1.07 1.15 1.09 1.04 1.14 1.17 1.32 .98 1.30 1.08 1.30 1.40 .61 .81 .86 .83 1.05 .94 .95 1.20 .96 1.05 1.15 1.23 1.12 1.30 1.10 1.14 1.01 1.07 1.16 1.10 1.00 1.17 1.32 1.12 .86 .75 1.05 .98 1.06 1.08 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.08 1.12 1.20 Bottom 1.15 1.18 1.09 .92 1.17 .96 1.10 1.00 .95 .75 1.45 1.35 .63 .74 .92 .84 .99 .86 1.20 .88 .85 .98 1.16 1.12 1.14 1.06 1.12 1.08 1.20 1.04 1.06 1.07 1.38 1.05 1.30 1.22 1.03 .72 1.23 .84 1.18 1.10 1.25 1.17 1.03 1.20 1.26 1.20 310 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Z-l-C Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 11 9 10 New York Apples liy 2 10 11 Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans isy 2 17 36 Cider 11 9 10 Clam Juice 12 14 15 Illinois Pumpkin 11 2 3 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 12 New York Pumpkin liy 2 6 8 Indiana Tomatoes 12*^ 11 12 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 12 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 ■ 12 Pounds per Base Box- Body Top Bottom .81 1.16 1.20 1.16 1.21 1.20 .82 .96 .93 1.18 1.11 1.08 1.35 1.10 .98 1.08 1.25 1.16 1.25 1.13 1.15 1.65 .98 1.23 1.22 1.28 1.23 1.24 1.26 1.25 .66 .78 .76 .68 .62 .81 .95 .91 .97 .76 1.36 .87 1.19 1.12 1.22 .92 1.16 1.14 1.35 1.17 1.16 1.08 1.12 1.08 1.25 1.30 1.22 1.23 1.27 1.18 .98 1.23 1.20 1.15 1.28 1.38 APPENDIX F 311 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued W-l-D Age , Pounds per Base Box ,, Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 11 9 1.04 1.41 1.36 10 1.31 1.20 1,44 New York Apples 11 J4 7 1-20 1.39 1.28 10 1.27 1.40 1.28 Pennsylvania Apples 11^ 18 1.16 1.05 1.30 19 1.09 1.52 1.40 String Beans 13>4 43 ■ 1.00 1.30 1.50 44 1.30 1.20 1.32 Cider ■■ 11 9 1.62 1.30 1.55 10 1.57 1.25 1.67 Clam Juice , 12 14 . 1.35 1.31 1.45 ' 15 1.60 1.41 1.52 Illinois Pumpkin 11 9 .98 .96 .78 10 .99 .96 1.08 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 1.02 .91 1.16 12 .91 1.08 .79 New York Pumpkin 11^ 8 1.16 1.26 1.38 11 1.54 1.29 1.31 Indiana Tomatoes 12^ 11 1.60 1.06 1.33 12 1.35 1.16 1.27 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 1.30 1.35 1.32 12 1.52 1.20 1.33 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 1.15 1.30 1.25 12 1.20 1.35 1.18 W-2-D Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples ll^ Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans 13^ Cider 11 Gam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^ Indiana Tomatoes 12J^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 9 10 9 12 6 21 14 20 9 10 14 15 4 8 11 12 9 10 11 12 11 12 11 12 1.00 1.22 1.22 1.45 1.33 1.26 1.65 1.10 1.42 1.29 1.30 1.58 .79 1.00 .84 1.17 1.27 1.24 1.08 1.51 1.40 1.45 1.05 1.30 1.41 1.07 1.30 1.49 1.31 1.35 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.38 1.55 1.52 .78 1.09 .79 1.23 1.19 1.47 1.37 1.05 1.70 1.30 1.15 1.47 1.14 1.46 1.42 1.15 1.26 1.44 1.65 1.43 1.50 1.60 1.48 1.40 1.09 .97 1.17 1.15 1.49 1.47 1.20 1.17 1.52 1.60 1.30 1.30 312 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916— Continued X-l-D Age , Pounds per Base Box s Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 11 9 1.31 1.14 1.79 10 1.14 1.30 1.19 New York Apples \V/i 9 1.22 1.35 1.30 11 1.07 1.19 1.36 Pennsylvania Apples 11 j£ 14 1.09 1.38 1.39 15 1.21 1.53 1.31 String Beans ■ 13 >4 17 1.10 1.20 1.22 19 1.22 1.50 1.47 Cider 11 9 1.40 1.30 1.45 10 1.61 1.50 1.58 Clam Juice 12 14 1.27 1.74 1.37 15 1.30 1.40 1.60 Illinois Pumpkin 11 1 .75 .93 .72 9 .75 .91 .80 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 1.05 .96 1.03 12 1.10 1.08 1.03 New York Pumpkin 11^ 8 1.23 1.23 1.53 12 1.23 1.11 1.30 Indiana Tomatoes 12^ 11 1.10 1.42 1.18 12 1.15 1.52 1.31 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 1.17 1.48 1.75 12 1.35 1.45 1.78 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 1.06 1.37 1.62 12 1.12 1.30 1.46 X-3-D Michigan Apples 11 9 .89 1.24 1.63 10 .90 1.22 1.30 New York Apples 11^ 20 1.14 1.05 1.12 21 1.03 .95 1.27 Pennsylvania Apples W/i 10 1.21 1.33 1.63 11 1.03 1.12 1.36 String Beans 13>4 10 1.15 1.32 ■ 1.12 11 1.02 1.15 1.20 Cider 11 9 .98 1.18 1.45 10 1.12 1.35 1.30 Clam Juice 12 14 1.15 1.50 1.35 15 1.22 1.60 1.40 Illinois Pumpkin 11 5 1.24 ' 1.27 1.07 6 .90 .71 1.08 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 1.14 .88 .94 12 1.29 .94 .99 New York Pumpkin 11^ 3 1.25 1.72 1.23 5 1.46 1.28 .95 Indiana Tomatoes 12>^ 11 1.12 1.15 1.54 12 1.41 1.50 1.52 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 1.20 1.38 1.40 12 1.10 1.15 1.60 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 1.17 1.60 1.12 12 1.26 1.03 1.86 APPENDIX F 313 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Y-l-D Age ^ — Pounds per Base Box s Article Months Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11^4 Pennsylvania Apples llj^ String Beans 13^ Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin \\y 2 Indiana Tomatoes 12^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 Y-4-D Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples liy 2 Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans 12>y 2 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11 J4 Indiana Tomatoes 12*4 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 in No. Body Top Bottom 9 1.45 1.22 1.27 10 1.28 1.30 1.51 1 1.21 1.56 1.12 2 1.03 1.19 1.09 19 1.33 1.43 1.29 20 1.31 1.28 1.40 33 1.22 1.18 1.30 35 1.46 1.15 1.25 9 1.31 1.20 1.45 10 1.28 1.36 1.44 14 1.40 1.35 1.30 15 1.57 1.46 1.48 2 .88 1.18 .98 3 .98 .93 1.03 11 .89 1.25 1.37 12 1.06 1.18 1.03 1 1.35 1.33 1.33 5 1.35 1.30 1.47 11 1.15 1.51 1.31 12 1.55 1.26 1.32 11 1.40 1.18 1.35 12 1.50 1.40 1.28 11 1.16 1.40 1.41 12 1.18 1.60 1.26 9 1.31 1.40 1.37 10 1.11 1.14 1.46 1 1.19 1.19 1.11 2 1.31 1.11 1.16 9 1.34 1.60 1.36 14 1.13 1.24 1.38 25 1.10 1.40 1.35 26 1.20 1.41 1.48 9 1.18 1.36 1.30 10 1.35 1.25 1.31 14 1.47 1.42 1.34 15 1.75 1.27 1.42 6 1.06 1.00 .99 9 .78 .88 1.09 11 .96 1.03 1.31 12 1.00 1.16 1.16 40 1.14 1.40 1.26 41 1.46 1.35 1.08 11 1.36 1.45 1.68 12 1.18 1.50 1.42 11 1.15 1.26 1.21 12 1.15 1.49 1.23 11 1.28 1.26 1.36 12 1.17 1.50 1.25 314 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Z-l-D Age , Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 11 9 10 New York Apples llj^ 1 2 Pennsylvania Apples llj^ 22 23 String Beans 13 }4 41 46 Cider 11 9 10 Clam Juice 12 14 15 Illinois Pumpkin 11 1 2 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 12 New York Pumpkin 11*^ 5 6 Indiana Tomatoes 12^4 11 12 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 12 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 12 Body Top Bottom 1.18 1.27 1.34 1.45 1.27 1.38 1.26 1.28 1.30 1.37 1.25 1.22 1.32 1.25 1.20 1.18 1.31 1.33 1.30 1.46 1.33 1.23 1.42 1.35 1.25 1.48 1.40 1.45 1.43 1.35 1.58 1.50 1.55 1.56 1.62 1.48 .88 1.13 .98 .87 .96 1.03 1.19 1.04 1.40 1.18 1.12 1.18 1.18 1.37 1.46 1.27 1.43 1.43 1.60 1.30 1.58 1.53 1.45 1.60 1.40 1.32 1.65 1.48 1.50 1.43 1.41 1.37 1.40 1.61 1.41 1.41 APPENDIX F 315 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued W-l-E Aere ,- — Pounds per Base Box ,, Article Months Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11 J4 Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans 13^ Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin . . . 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin \\y 2 Indiana Tomatoes 12^2 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 W-2-E Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples .' W/2 Pennsylvania Apples 11>2 String Beans 13^ Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^ Indiana Tomatoes 12^4 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 in No. Body Top Bottom 9 1.69 1.72 1.60 10 1.54 1.67 1.47 7 1.43 1.61 1.49 10 1.45 1.53 1.52 9 1.62 1.49 1.37 18 1.20 1.63 1.52 28 1.45 1.85 1.60 33 1.28 1.38 1.42 9 1.27 1.58 1.68 10 1.58 1.85 1.70 14 1.55 1.70 1.90 15 1.56 1.68 8 .98 1.26 1.19 9 1.41 1.23 1.27 11 1.20 1.15 1.41 12 1.43 1.29 1.40 5 1.32 1.64 1.62 6 1.47 1.62 1.72 11 1.55 1.77 1.72 12 1.65 1.38 1.78 11 1:58 1.70 1.65 12 1.65 1.68 1.60 11 1.38 1.26 2.05 12 1.60 1.54 2.06 9 1.18 1.67 1.58 10 1.30 1.44 1.35 19 1.30 1.87 1.19 22 1.63 1.88 1.35 6 1.81 1.30 1.58 20 1.57 1.56 1.47 13 1.70 1.55 1.52 18 1.69 1.79 1.35 9 1.42 1.28 1.88 10 1.53 1.52 1.48 14 1.56 1.55 1.80 15 1.72 1.68 1.56 11 1.39 1.46 1.26 12 1.48 1.18 .84 11 1.64 1.84 1.17 12 1.56 1.23 1.37 10 1.52 1.15 1.46 11 1.42 1.54 1.80 11 1.82 1.88 1.23 12 1.88 1.52 1.62 11 1.70 1.72 1.33 12 1.56 1.92 1.76 11 1.82 1.98 1.71 12 1.80 1.81 1.90 316 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued X-l-E Age Article Months Can No. Body Michigan Apples 11 9 1.59 10 • 1.42 New York Apples liy 2 6 1.54 7 1.37 Pennsylvania Apples 11^2 15 1.45 16 1.52 String Beans 13>4 19 1.60 22 1.50 Cider 11 9 1.38 10 1.50 Clam Juice 12 14 1.57 15 2.05 Illinois Pumpkin 11 5 1.29 10 1.17 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 1.27 12 1.22 New York Pumpkin liy 2 3 1.56 5 1.41 Indiana Tomatoes 12^2 11 1.52 12 1.78 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 1.64 12 1.40 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 1.31 12 1.58 X-3-E Pounds per Base Box Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11^ Pennsylvania Apples 11/4 String Beans 13^ Cider ..." 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin liy, Indiana Tomatoes 12^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 9 10 1 2 10 11 7 11 9 10 14 15 4 8 11 12 3 7 11 12 11 12 11 12 1.51 1.46 1.37 1.45 1.54 1.62 1.62 1.36 1.25 2.10 1.30 1.48 1.08 1.46 1.13 1.84 1.57 1.54 1.28 1.82 1.30 1.38 1.48 1.31 Top 1.65 1.81 1.63 1.63 1.80 1.56 1.42 1.53 1.80 1.45 1.90 1.75 1.17 1.42 1.30 1.16 1.57 1.67 1.02 1.75 1.37 1.45 1.55 1.60 1.79 1.58 1.53 1.51 1.36 1.77 1.35 1.75 1.28 1.40 1.74 1.58 1.15 1.33 1.34 .88 1.62 1.51 1.56 1.40 1.72 1.38 1.95 1.48 Bottom 1.45 1.76 1.78 1.45 1.40 1.57 1.50 1.77 1.61 1.63 1.75 2.01 1.20 1.39 1.60 1.22 1.62 1.82 1.55 2.00 1.71 1.75 1.82 1.86 1.55 1.54 1.35 1.42 1.46 1.63 1.40 1.88 1.68 1.60 1.58 1.67 1.09 .95 1.43 1.18 1.48 1.52 1.60 1.65 1.40 1.46 1.54 1.88 APPENDIX F 317 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Y-l-E Age Article Months Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11^ Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans 13 }4 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11 J^ Indiana Tomatoes 11 J^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 Y-4-E Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11*4 Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans 13^2 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 113^2 Indiana Tomatoes 12^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 Can No. 9 , Pounds Body 1.30 per Base Top 1.63 Box N Bottom 1.60 10 1.41 1.81 1.71 1 1.44 1.62 1.60 2 1.46 1.52 1.59 9 1.63 1.70 1.75 20 1.68 1.58 1.81 15 1.62 1.65 1.78 19 1.40 1.75 1.85 9 1.58 1.90 1.90 10 1.57 1.68 1.50 14 1.75 1.60 1.72 15 1.55 1.72 1.65 6 1.11 1.18 1.28 7 1.19 1.50 1.07 11 1.37 1.00 1.39 12 1.46 1.38 1.46 7 1.72 1.75 2.00 12 1.56 1.80 1.57 11 1.80 1.61 1.68 12 1.60 1.80 1.92 11 1.64 1.50 1.75 12 1.60 1.70 1.90 11 1.40 1.53 1.55 12 1.60 1.61 1.84 9 1.63 1.54 1.69 10 1.57 1.74 1.71 1 1.50 1.60 1.80 2 1.42 1.51 1.52 19 1.65 1.54 1.42 20 1.50 1.69 1.67 15 1.40 1.35 .90 20 1.65 1.45 1.45 9 1.48 1.50 1.67 10 1.49 1.52 1.55 14 1.92 1.85 1.67 15 1.72 1.97 1.88 2 1.14 1.40 1.27 6 1.31 1.00 1.36 11 1.24 1.51 1.40 12 1.14 1.19 1.40 2 1.60 1.96 1.57 6 1.40 1.22 1.71 11 1.54 2.02 1.92 12 1.30 1.60 1.90 11 1.42 1.85 2.02 12 1.68 1.35 1.63 11 1.43 1.37 1.75 12 1.45 1.58 1.70 318 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Z-l-E Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 11 9 10 New York Apples llj^ 1 2 Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans 13 J4 15 21 Cider 11 9 10 Clam Juice 12 14 15 Illinois Pumpkin 11 1 2 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 12 New York Pumpkin 11^ 6 7 Indiana Tomatoes 12J^ 11 12 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 12 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 12 Pounds per Base Box Body Top Bottom 1.59 1.51 1.49 1.48 1.56 2.03 1.76 1.57 1.42 1.62 1.56 1.36 1.40 1.72 1.87 1.43 1.56 1.61 1.58 1.88 1.52 1.48 1.80 1.63 1.70 1.67 1.60 2.05 1.91 1.80 1.26 1.22 1.35 1.15 1.09 1.23 1.19 1.57 1.37 1.17 1.05 1.67 1.55 1.50 1.60 1.59 1.69 1.74 1.65 Lost 1.78 2.00 1.85 1.54 1.68 1.76 1.68 1.70 1.66 1.73 1.55 1.66 1.72 1.48 1.51 1.92 APPENDIX F 319 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued W-l-F • Age £- — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples . '. 11^ Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans .- lSj4 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^2 Indiana Tomatoes 12^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 W-2-F Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11 J4 Pennsylvania Apples 11^ String Beans 13^ Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^ Indiana Tomatoes 12^2 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 !an No. Body Top Bottom 9 1.84 1.88 1.95 10 1.76 2.16 1.53 21 2.28 2.10 1.93 22 1.62 .94 1.51 11 1.84 2.25 1.82 22 1.59 1.55 1.63 17 1.65 1.80 1.92 18 2.18 2.00 1.84 9 2.35 1.98 2.02 10 1.91 1.97 2.05 14 1.58 1.93 1.88 15 2.35 1.65 1.55 9 1.52 1.44 1.57 11 1.20 1.63 1.58 11 1.91 1.36 2.23 12 1.67 1.89 1.65 8 1.71 1.94 1.85 11 1.95 1.40 1.29 11 1.60 1.75 1.85 12 2.00 2.12 1.52 11 1.88 2.10 1.98 12 1.70 2.46 2.13 11 2.00 1.96 1.92 12 1.35 2.15 2.31 9 2.00 2.38 1.62 10 2.21 1.71 2.10 14 2.11 1.64 2.18 20 1.72 1.61 1.92 8 1.73 1.69 1.79 20 1.92 1.62 2.29 16 2.10 2.22 1.75 6 2.10 2.08 1.72 9 2.05 1.94 1.73 10 & .mm 2.10 1.74 14 1.80 1.81 2.12 15 1.90 1.65 2.26 6 1.63 1.85 1.14 10 1.77 1.39 2.04 11 1.30 1.49 1.74 12 1.60 1.50 1.90 5 2.13 2.41 1.83 21 1.73 2.42 1.63 11 1.78 1.87 2.48 12 1.95 2.17 2.31 11 2.36 1.98 1.71 12 1.86 1.80 1.85 11 1.72 2.48 1.81 12 2.00 2.56 2.28 320 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued X-l-F Age r — Pounds per Base Box Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples W/2 Pennsylvania Apples 11^2 String Beans 13J4 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin llj^ Indiana Tomatoes 12J/2 Maryland Tomatoes ■'. . . 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 X-3-F Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11 }£ Pennsylvania Apples 11J-4 String Beans 13 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^2 Indiana Tomatoes 12J^ Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 an No. Body Top Bottom 9 1.58 1.94 1.73 10 1.26 .81 1.69 18 1.72 1.71 1.89 21 1.89 1.92 1.78 15 1.52 1.87 2.38 16 1.56 2.03 2.12 23 2.10 1.52 2.07 33 2.20 1.95 1.87 9 1.50 1.80 2.10 10 1.45 1.77 1.90 14 1.87 2.15 1.97 15 1.80 1.96 2.15 3 1.59 1.34 1.46 7 1.73 1.67 1.49 11 1.37 1.93 1.52 12 1.32 1.46 2.03 6 2.13 2.03 2.10 7 1.88 1.67 1.99 11 1.58 2.12 2.13 12 1.93 2.70 1.87 11 2.33 1.80 1.82 12 1.62 1.94 2.05 11 2.50 2.00 1.78 12 1.86 1.75 1.88 9 1.94 1.84 1.66 10 1.41 1.92 1.84 2 1.49 1.62 1.45 3 1.62 1.72 1.99 11 1.93 1.55 1.66 12 1.94 1.73 1.92 29 1.78 1.98 /t./j'/i 33 1.40 1.63 1.75 9 1.82 1.75 1.96 10 1.65 1.95 2.10 14 1.87 2.05 2.10 15 1.75 1.90 2.12 11 1.39 1.29 1.33 12 1.12 1.32 1.25 11 1.59 1.50 2.14 12 1.28 1.12 1.12 9 1.66 1.48 2.13 11 1.95 1.58 1.73 11 1.52 2.00 2.06 12 1.65 2.06 2.18 11 1.85 1.90 1.90 12 2.03 2.01 1.96 11 2.30 2.00 1.89 12 1.78 1.95 1.87 APPENDIX F 321 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Y-l-F Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 11 9 10 New York Apples liy 2 1 2 Pennsylvania Apples 11^2 9 10 String Beans 13^ 11 18 Cider 11 9 10 Clam Juice 12 14 15 Illinois Pumpkin 11 8 9 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 12 New York Pumpkin 11^ 5 6 Indiana Tomatoes 12J^ 11 12 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 12 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 12 Y-4-F Body 1.33 1.36 1.59 1.34 1.93 1.60 2.16 2.30 1.58 1.75 1.89 1.90 1.32 1.85 1.96 1.45 1.79 1.89 1.35 1.66 1.65 2.26 1.84 Pounds per Base Box Top 2.05 2.00 1.67 1.75 1.94 1.75 2.40 1.85 1.84 1.83 2.10 1.92 1.66 1.94 1.42 1.59 1.71 2.14 2.10 2.00 2.25 2.13 1.90 1.75 Bottom 1.86 1.73 2.20 2.03 1.87 2.27 1.85 1.68 2.11 2.36 2.10 1.95 1.33 1.81 1.42 1.94 1.72 1.84 2.00 1.95 2.40 2.45 1.98 2.15 Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11^ Pennsylvania Apples 11^2 String Beans 13^4 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^ Indiana Tomatoes 12^2 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 9 10 1 2 1 2 16 18 9 10 14 15 1 4 11 12 5 11 11 12 11 12 11 12 1.34 1.81 1.57 1.72 1.63 1.81 1.45 1.75 1.60 1.50 1.46 1.47 1.13 1.42 1.33 1.52 2.03 2.00 1.60 2.00 2.04 2.08 1.96 1.60 1.62 1.78 1.79 1.55 1.92 1.54 2.12 2.'05 1.78 1.75 2.05 2.40 1.81 1.82 1.44 1.36 2.43 2.24 1.78 2.08 1.75 2.11 1.78 2.28 1.83 1.76 1.66 1.84 2.01 1.66 1.87 1.85 1.77 1.95 1.85 2.04 1.52 1.75 2.01 2.04 1.72 1.77 2.15 1.88 1.58 1.71 1.90 2.05 322 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 : — Continued Z-l-F Age , — Pounds per Base Box ,, Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 11 9 1.88 2.57 1.81 10 2.03 1.83 1.80 New York Apples liy 2 1 1.96 1.87 1.56 2 1.76 1.85 1.72 Pennsylvania Apples 11^ 11 1.59 1.69 1.32 String Beans 13^ 15 1.58 2.26 1.70 16 1.88 1.90 1.63 Cider 11 9 1.00 2.18 2.00 10 1.85 2.05 2.44 Clam Juice 12 14 2.06 1.87 1.95 15 2.20 1.50 2.00 Illinois Pumpkin 11 4 1.68 1.58 1.70 7 1.23 • 1.22 1.46 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 1.81 1.40 1.71 12 1.62 1.60 1.44 New York Pumpkin 11^ 2 1.66 1.82 1.81 8 2.42 1.84 2.06 Indiana Tomatoes 12>^ 11 1.48 1.70 ' 1.90 12 1.49 1.87 1.72 Maryland Tomatoes .13 11 1.98 1.88 2.00 12 2.00 1.90 2.10 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 1.94 1.95 1.71 12 2.13 2.01 1.86 APPENDIX F 323 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued W-l-G Age , Pounds per Base Box ., Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 11 9 2.10 2.60 4.06 10 1.95 3.40 2.57 New York Apples 11 J4 3 2.44 3.26 2.58 15 2.51 2.58 2.69 Pennsylvania Apples 11 J4 10 2.42 2.48 2.82 11 2.34 2.67 2.71 String Beans 13>4 10 3.00 3.50 2.48 11 2.95 2.75 2.71 Cider 11 9 2.82 3.28 5.52 10 3.17 3.22 2.55 Clam Juice 12 ' 14 2.42 2.90 3.50 15 2.60 2.90 4.27 Illinois Pumpkin 11 2 2.71 3.02 3.33 10 2.37 3.14 2.18 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 2.18 2.57 2.17 12 2.00 2.74 2.20 New York Pumpkin 11 }4 4 2.77 3.23 2.99 5 2.81 2.57 2.85 Indiana Tomatoes 12^ 11 3.54 3.17 2.50 12 2.52 3.08 2.95 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 2.50 2.84 2.56 12 2.48 4.00 2.93 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 2.03 2.84 3.00 12 2.48 2.36 2.58 W-2-G Michigan Apples '. 11 New York Apples W/2. Pennsylvania Apples W/ 2 String Beans 13J4 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^/2 Indiana Tomatoes 12^2 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 9 10 8 9 13 14 18 22 9 10 14 15 11 12 11 12 2 3 11 12 11 12 11 12 2.60 2.54 2.36 2.17 2.76 2.43 2.45 2.35 2.24 2.68 3.55 2.06 3.11 2.74 2.54 2.16 3.15 2.55 2.36 2.45 2.92 3.48 3.37 3.30 3.15 2.52 2.35 3.55 2.52 2.45 2.48 2.77 2.88 2.60 4.70 2.18 2.30 5.35 3.05 2.36 2.24 2.52 3.10 2.85 2.38 2.91 2.86 2.45 2.81 3.06 5.00 3.17 3.07 2.93 2.50 2.92 2.61 3.00 3.10 2.19 2.04 3.49 3.69 2.49 2.48 2.58 3.25 3.12 3.57 2.45 2.28 324 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916— Continued X-l-G Age r Pounds per Base Box N Article Months Can No. Body Top Bottom Michigan Apples 11 9 2.03 2.99 2.74 10 4.13 2.48 2.94 New York Apples 11% 3 5.78 3.52 2.86 11 1.84 2.86 2.57 Pennsylvania Apples 11%' 8 2.05 2.86 2.88 14 2.07 3.68 3.25 String Beans 13% 11 2.35 2.85 2.80 13 1.80 3.82 3.00 Cider 11' 9 5.18 2.78 2.58 10 2.68 2.70 2.87 Clam Juice 12 14 2.10 2.95 3.70 15 1.95 3.03 3.60 Illinois Pumpkin 11 1 4.26 . 2.30 2.23 10 3.48 2.54 2.44 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 1.93 2.41 2.07 12 1.93 2.88 2.90 New York Pumpkin 11*4 7 2.46 4.58 3.60 8 2.24 2.33 2.67 Indiana Tomatoes 12% 11 2.25 3.15 3.40 12 2.42 3.72 3.28 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 2.70 3.55 2.78 12 5.08 2.58 2.53 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 2.38 3.30 3.31 12 2.50 2.83 3.23 X-3-G Michigan Apples 11 9 2.42 3.19 3.38 10 2.33 2.35 3.06 New York Apples 11% 1 6.19 2.87 4.60 2 5.39 2.55 2.39 Pennsylvania Apples 11% 4 2.12 2.62 2.64 5 2.66 3.53 2.92 String Beans 13% 45 1.95 3.75 3.28 48 2.36 2.48 3.36 Cider 11 9 3.20 3.85 2.57 10 5.18 2.55 2.53 Clam Juice 12 14 4.12 3.10 3.10 15 1.95 2.65 3.02 Illinois Pumpkin 11 6 1.82 2.37 2.32 7 1.72 3.01 3.23 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 2.50 1.83 2.60 12 4.37 2.52 2.63 New York Pumpkin 11% 2 2.23 2.53 2.89 5 2.34 2.57 2.16 Indiana Tomatoes 12% 11 2.43 3.20 2.75 12 2.45 3.10 2.82 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 2.28 3.32 4.92 12 2.88 2.88 4.00 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 2.28 3.15 2.74 12 3.35 2.95 3.28 APPENDIX F 325 WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Y-l-G Age r _ — Pounds per Base Box .^ Article Months Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11^ Pennsylvania Apples ll*^ String Beans 13^' Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin 11^ Indiana Tomatoes 12^2 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 Y-4-G Michigan Apples 11 New York Apples 11 J^ Pennsylvania Apples 11/^ String Beans 13^4 Cider 11 Clam Juice 12 Illinois Pumpkin 11 Michigan Pumpkin 11 New York Pumpkin W/2. Indiana Tomatoes 12^2 Maryland Tomatoes 13 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 an No. Body Top Bottom 9 2.49 2.67 2.80 10 2.55 3.07 3.00 1 3.12 2.77 2.65 2 2.12 2.83 2.35 10 3.75 2.75 2.70 14 2.02 3.65 2.66 27. 4.15 2.85 2.77 28 4.90 2.65 2.67 9 2.30 2.65 2.16 10 2.41 2.98 2.60 14 2.50 3.75 2.96 15 2.73 2.68 2.75 9 2.06 1.76 1.95 10 2.04 2.08 2.04 11 2.48 1.76 1.98 12 2.19 2.33 2.27 6 2.36 2.68 2.36 9 4.00 3.25 3.11 11 1.98 2.80 2.83 12 3.13 2.75 2.90 11 3.08 2.60 3.92 12 2.30 3.00 2.96 11 2.75 2.45 2.82 12 2.40 2.31 3.50 9 2.15 2.67 2.94 10 4.12 2.88 3.07 21 3.40 6.24 6.16 22 2.70 2.67 2.49 6 2.46 3.22 2.79 10 2.35 3.49 2.83 38 2.05 2.70 2.50 44 2.42 2.75 3.30 9 2.30 2.58 2.88 10 1.98 6.08 3.95 14 2.27 2.78 2.96 15 2.60 2.97 3.10 1 2.06 2.19 2.32 3 2.07 2.70 2.40 11 2.23 2.74 2.44 12 2.14 2.65 3.49 7 2.03 3.05 3.00 11 2.70 2.47 3.14 11 2.66 2.42 3.40 12 2.75 2.68 2.50 11 2.48 3.20 2.75 12 2.65 2.50 3.30 11 2.51 3.68 3.08 12 2.31 2.60 3.65 326 APPENDIX F WEIGHT OF TIN COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Z-l-G Age Article Months Can No. Michigan Apples 11 9 10 New York Apples liy 2 19 22 Pennsylvania Apples 11 Yz 10 12 String Beans 13^4 5 7 Cider 11 9 10 Clam Juice 12 14 15 Illinois Pumpkin 11 6 8 Michigan Pumpkin 11 11 12 New York Pumpkin IVfe 7 11 Indiana Tomatoes 12J^ 11 12 Maryland Tomatoes 13 11 12 New Jersey Tomatoes 13 11 12 Body 4.24 2.71 2.90 2.71 2.88 2.35 5.48 2.42 2.88 2.20 2.54 2.45 2.37 1.82 1.99 2.18 3.46 2.21 2.42 2.57 2.58 2.62 2.87 2.43 Pounds per Base Box Top 2.27 3.78 2.74 2.82 3.11 3.09 2.51 2.12 2.57 2.90 3.35 2.90 5.25 2.40 2.55 2.40 2.31 2.21 2.52 2.82 2.68 3.03 5.50 2.82 Bottom 2.64 2.33 2.39 2.52 2.56 2.29 2.15 2.51 2.40 2.80 3.15 3.25 2.18 2.06 2.47 2.18 2.42 4.98 4.18 2.78 2.92 3.28 2.63 2.68 APPENDIX F 327 AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS First Inspection, December 1, 1915 Made for A .90 B 1.10 Pounds C 1.30 i per Base D 1.50 ! Box E 1.80 F 2.10 G 3.00 Michigan Apples Average (Bodies) . .74 .89 1.07 1.29 1.52 1.62 2.69 Average (Ends) . . .81 1.02 1.17 1.38 1.66 1.89 2.91 Maximum .98 1.23 1.47 1.64 2.10 2.25 4.38 Minimum .58 .78 .80 .89 1.35 1.21 2.22 Correction .04 .05 .05 .04 .05 .05 .06 New York Apples Average (Bodies) . .68- .88 1.01 1.25 1.51 1.71 3.01 Average (Ends) . . .72 .94 1.09 1.32 1.66 1.88 3.11 Maximum .88 1.12 1.27 1.64 2.05 2.57 6.61 Minimum .51 .72 .71 1.02 1.14 1.23 2.16 .10 .12 .13 .12 .12 .12 .12 Pennsylvania Apples Average (Bodies) . Average (Ends) . . .75 .79 .97 .90 1.06 1.33 1.10 1.17 1.34 1.23 1.43 1.77 1.53 1.66 1.97 1.86 1.92 2.33 ' 2.90 3.15 5.42 Minimum .64 .04 .73 .05 .84 .04 .80 .05 1.14 .05 1.37 .04 2.20 .04 String Beans Average (Bodies) . .77 .93 1.09 1.33 1.60 1.98 2.79 Average (Ends) . . .76 .97 1.17 1.41 1.59 1.93 2.91 Maximum 1.02 1.22 1.37 1.72 1.87 2.79 6.02 Minimum .58 .71 .91 1.04 1.25 1.40 2.03 .06 .06 .07 .07 .08 .09 .09 Cider Average (Bodies) . .75 .93 1.10 1.32 1.50 1.93 3.15 Average (Ends) . . .79 .99 1.15 1.42 1.68 2.02 3.11 1.00 1.26 1.37 1.76 1.93 ' 2.55 7.05 Minimum .64 .68 .88 .97 1.11 1.46 1.81 .05 .05 .04 .05 .05 .05 .05 Clam Juice Average (Bodies) . .81 1.03 1.15 1.41 1.60 1.86 2.83 Average (Ends) . . Maximum . . • .89 1.10 1.11 1.40 1.30 1.56 1.46 1.75 1.80 2.16 2.05 2.35 2.92 4.55 Minimum .70 .83 1.00 1.16 1.25 1.33 2.24 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 Illinois Corn Average (Bodies) . Average (Ends) . . .81 .84 .95 1.04 1.16 1.21 1.34 1.46 1.65 1.71 1.79 1.91 3.29 2.66 Maximum 1.00 1.22 1.50 1.80 2.18 2.47 6.08 Minimum .65 .74 .86 .97 1.28 1.42 1.90 Correction . . .• .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 328 APPENDIX F AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915— Continued Pounds per Base Box N A B C D E F G Made for .90 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.80 2.10 3.00 Indiana Corn Average (Bodies) . .82 .99 1.19 1.32 1.69 1.96 2.86 Average (Ends) . . .86 1.08 1.22 1.42 1.73 2.04 3.08 .Maximum 1.29 1.42 1.51 1.78 2.16 2.65 6.75 Minimum .57 .75 .88 .89 1.37 1.57 2.00 Correction .01 .01 . .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 Maine Corn (End) Average (Bodies) . .82 .96 1.12 1.41 1.65 1.96 2.83 Average (Ends) . . .85 1.04 1=22 1.46 1.72 2.05 3.07 Maximum 1.08 1.35 1.58 1.91 2.05 2.92 6.24 Minimum .60 .72 .81 1.11 1.35 1.59 1.88 Correction .01 .01 .01 .01 .00 .01 .01 Maine Corn (Side) Average (Bodies) . .84 .99 1.15 1.36 1.67 1.97 2.62 Average (Ends) . . .87 1.09 1.26 1.48 1.80 2.09 3.08 Maximum 1.06 1.43 1.55 1.83 2.11 3.32 4.83 Minimum .73 .75 .89 1.10 1.30 1.37 1.87 .01 .01 .01 .01 .00 .01 .01 Condensed Milk Average (Bodies) . .84 1.03 1.24 1.39 1.71 2.03 2.71 Average (Ends) . . .84 1.05 1.24 1.49 1.77 1.94 3.09 Maximum 1.00 1.30 1.58 2.03 2.13 2.54 4.99 Minimum .72 .85 1.03 1.15 1.46 1.49 2.01 Correction .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Evaporated Milk Average (Bodies) . .76 .94 1.14 1.44 1.61 1.89 3.39 Average (Ends) . . .79 1.05 1.24 1.41 1.70 1.99 2.88 Maximum 1.05 1.26 1.62 1.71 2.12 2.54 6.58 Minimum .62 .79 .93 1.16 1.29 1.35 2.23 .03 .05 .04 .04 .04 .04 .04 Peas Average (Bodies) . .81 .98 1.21 1.39 1.57 1.92 2.68 Average (Ends) . . .84 1.06 1.22 1.45 1.69 2.04 2.95 Maximum 1.17 1.36 1.65 1.98 2.07 2.91 5.61 Minimum .56 .69 .88 .98 1.15 1.33 1.91 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 Illinois Pumpkin Average {Bodies) . .70 .86 1.02 1.29 1.54 1.72 2.58 Average (Ends) . . .82 .98 1.17 1.33 1.69 2.05 3.01 1.00 1.22 1.41 1.65 2.08 2.58 5.83 Minimum .57 .68 .72 .97 1.32 1.20 1.98 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .11 .11 Michigan Pumpkin Average (Bodies) . .80 .94 1.15 1.37 1.64 1.87 2.65 Average (Ends) . . .82 1.03 1.17 1.47 1.72 2.04 3.07 Maximum 1.01 1.26 1.43 1.99 2.06 2.64 5.33 Minimum .69 .04 .76 .05 .93 .05 1.06 .05 1.39 .05 1.44 .06 2.05 .06 APPENDIX F 329 AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS— Continued First Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued A Made for 90 New York Pumpkin Average (Bodies) . .74 Average (Ends) . . .80 Maximum 1.03 Minimum 60 Correction 03 Indiana Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .77 Average (Ends) . . .83 Maximum 1.15 Minimum 65 Correction ' . .05 Maryland Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .79 Average (Ends) . . .80 Maximum .' . . . 1.20 Minimum 55 Correction 04 New Jersey Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .79 Average (Ends) ... .81 Maximum 1.10 Minimum . .65 Correction 04 Tuna Fish Average (Bodies) . .86 Average (Ends) . . .83 Maximum 1.40 Minimum 65 Correction 00 Grand Average 80 Maximum 1.40 Minimum 51 Correction 03 B c D B p G 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.80 2.10 3.00 .95 1.06 1.24 1.67 1.89 2.77 1.05 1.23 1.38 1.71 2.02 2.78 1.23 1.56 1.60 2.15 2.70 3.85 .79 .77 1.05 1.37 1.49 2.10 .03 .03 .03 .03 .03 .03 1.00 1.11 1.22 1.66 1.89 3.04 1.09 1.20 1.43 1.76 2.11 2.97 1.46 1.50 1.75 2.06 2.73 5.59 .85 .86 1.10 1.45 1.35 2J0 .04 .03 .03 .03 .03 .03 .91 1.05 1.32 1.55 1.85 2.95 .98 1.15 1.35 1.72 2.06 2.93 1.16 1.40 1.65 2.05 3.03 5.25 .70 .93 .96 1.24 1.33 ' 2.25 .04 .04 .03 .03 .04 .03 .96 1.07 1.35 1.53 1.82 2.85 1.02 1.16 1.42 1.69 1.99 2.84 1.20 1.35 1.67 2.05 2.55 4.76 .75 .83 1.05 .98 1.50 2.26 .04 .04 .04 .05 .04 .03 .99 1.25 1.46 1.70 1.87 2.66 1.02 1.19 1.43 1.72 1.91 3.14 1.48 1.55 1.68 2.10 2.33 5.17 .77 .71 .96 1.35 1.52 2.10 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.17 1.38 1.67 1.90 2.92 1.48 1.65 2.03 2.18 3.32 7.05 .68 .71 .80 .98 1.21 1.81 .03 .03 .03 .04 .04 .04 330 APPENDIX F AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 A Made for 90 Michigan Apples Average (Bodies) . .70 Average (Ends) . . .79 Maximum 93 Minimum 59 Correction .05 New York Apples Average (Bodies) . .68 Average (Ends) . . .71 Maximum 88 Minimum 58 Correction 11 Pennsylvania Apples Average (Bodies) . .75 Average (Ends) . . .79 Maximum 98 Minimum 64 Correction 06 String Beans Average (Bodies) . .74 Average (Ends) . . .78 Maximum 1.00 Minimum 62 Correction 08 Cider Average (Bodies) . .73 Average (Ends) . . .76 Maximum 93 Minimum 62 Correction 05 Clam Juice Average (Bodies) . .84 Average (Ends) . . .85 Maximum 1.00 Minimum 70 Correction 01 Illinois Corn Average (Bodies) . .78 Average (Ends) . . .84 Maximum 1.33 Minimum. . . 59 Correction 01 Pounds per Base Box — ^ B C D FJ F G 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.80 2.10 3.00 .92 1.12 1.25 1.50 1.88 3.30 1.00 1.19 1.37 1.70 1.89 3.08 1.25 1.55 1.83 1.96 2.33 5.78 .68 .83 1.05 1.26 1.38 2.24 .05 .05 .05 .05 .06 .05 .85 1.03 1.27 1.53 1.83 £.99 .93 1.13 1.35 1.66 1.89 3.06 1.19 1.44 1.65 2.02 2.36 5.50 .75 .77 1.00 1.19 1.46 2.09 .12 .12 .12 .12 .12 .14 .89 1.11 1.34 1.63 1.81 2,69 1.00 1.17 1.40 1.68 1.92 3.19 1.14 1.36 1.65 2.07 2.48 5.58 .74 .93 1.12 1.40 1.51 2.23 .05 .05 .06 .05 .05 .05 .91 1.09 1.36 1.60 1.98 2.70 1.00 1.13 1.31 1.61 1.98 2.74 1.41 1.45 1.72 1.98 2.56 5.05 .73 .77 1.04 1.26 1.46 2.02 .08 .09 .09 .11 .11 .12 .90 1.15 1.29 1.64 1.95 2.70 .97 1.17 1.38 1.69 1.93 3.02 1.20 1.47 1.77 2.07 2.62 4.13 .70 .83 1.10 1.37 1.51 2.02 .05 .06 .06 .05 .07 .-06 1.09 1.18 1.39 1.61 1.73 2.C7 1.10 1.21 1.42 1.76 1.95 3.12 1.68 1.52 1.61 2.10 2.26 5.25 .89 1.02 1.14 1.19 1.44 1.95 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .93 1.19 1.33 1.74 1.82 3.23 1.05 1.20 1.42 1.68 1.93 2.63 1.28 1.60 1.75 2.18 2.55 6.10 .78 .80 1.03 1.30 1.38 1.98 .01 .02 .01 .01 .01 .01 APPENDIX F 331 AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS— Continued Second Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued — Pounds per Base Box - C D E 1.30 1.50 1.80 A B Made for 90 1.10 Indiana Corn Average (Bodies). .82 1.01 1.18 1.36 1.65 Average (Ends) .. .85 1.07 1.20 1.45 1.71 Maximum 1.11 1.32 1.62 1.81 2.22 Minimum 57 .78 .83 1.14 1.17 Correction 01 .01 .01 .01 .01 Maine Corn (End) Average (Bodies). .83 1.03 1.14 1.40 1.74 Average (Ends) . . .84 1.11 1.-24 1.47 1.74 Maximum 1.11 1.29 1.58 1.85 2.11 Minimum 63 .81 .86 .95 1.29 Correction- .00 .00 .00 ".00 .00 Maine Corn (Side) Average (Bodies). .82 .97 1.12 1.36 1.71 Average (Ends) . . .87 1.10 1.26 1.47 1.77 Maximum 1.10 1.98 1.90 2.67 2.10 Minimum 63 .73 .84 1.03 1.38 Correction 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Condensed Milk Average (Bodies) . .82 1.04 1.16 1.39 1.80 Average (Ends) . . .86 1.09 1.24 1.42 1.76 Maximum . 1.28 1.31 1.48 1.75 2.11 Minimum . .68 .92 1.06 1.21 1.39 Correction .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Evaporated Milk Average (Bodies). .81 .99 1.25 1.38 1.63 Average (Ends) . . .80 1.12 1.24 1.45 1.74 Maximum 99 1.83 1.53 1.83 2.50 Minimum 58 .81 1.02 1.12 1.25 Correction 06 .06 .05 .05 .05 Peas Average (Bodies). .82 .97 1.19 1.40 1.68 Average (Ends) . . .84 1.07 1.23 1.44 1.71 Maximum 1.09 1.39 2.54 1.83 2.29 Minimum 67 .73 .75 .97 1.32 Correction .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 Illinois Pumpkin Average (Bodies). .72 .81 1.01 1.25 1.44 Average (Ends) . . .77 .94 1.06 1.26 1.57 Maximum 98 1.21 1.28 1.72 1.88 Minimum 51 .61 .72 .85 1.15 Correction 09 .13 .16 .17 .17 Michigan Pumpkin Average (Bodies) . .69 .92 1.00 1.29 1.61 Average (Ends) .. .76 .97 1.12 1.29 1.65 Maximum 1.01 1.24 1.39 1.76 1.95 Minimum 57 .75 .71 1.00 1.05 Correction 07 .08 .09 .09 .10 p 2.10 1.97 2.05 2.63 1.48 .01 2.01 2.07 2.72 1.62 .00 1.96 2.06 2.77 1.48 .00 1.90 1.98 2.73 1.45 .00 1.91 2.05 2.68 1.48 .05 2.00 2.02 2.92 1.34 .01 1.78 1.88 2.58 1.17 .20 1.74 1.85 2.46 1.32 .10 G 3.00 2.90 3.04 6.00 1.55 .01 2.68 3.06 6.02 1.90 .00 2.92 3.06 6.20 1.83 .00 2.64 2.98 3.81 2.13 .00 3.17 2.90 6.75 2.00 .05 2.80 3.05 6.74 2.03 .01 2.92 2.89 6.68 2.00 .20 2.99 2.85 6.17 1.96 .13 332 APPENDIX F AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS- Second Inspection, February 1, 1916— Continued -Continued — Pounds per Base Box - C D B 1.30 1.50 1.80 A B Made for...- 90 1.10 New York Pumpkin Average (Bodies). .72 .96 1.04 1.24 1.55 Average (Ends) . . .78 1.03 1.18 1.40 1.70 Maximum 96 1.22 1.36 1.83 1.98 Minimum 55 .74 .80 .98 1.30 Correction 04 .03 .04 .03 .03 Indiana Tomatoes Average (Bodies). .75 .94 1.17 1.36 1.65 Average (Ends) . . .81 1.03 1.17 1.42 1.69 Maximum 1.03 1.38 1.36 1.62 2.08 Minimum 58 .73 .88 1.05 1.30 Correction 05 .05 .04 .03 .03 Maryland Tomatoes Average (Bodies). .72 .97 1.12 1.32 1.55 Average (Ends) . . .78 1.00 1.18 1.37 1.70 Maximum..' 87 1.16 1.38 1.83 2.10 Minimum 63 .74 .85 1.12 1.24 Correction 04 .04 .04 .04 .04 New Jersey Tomatoes Average (Bodies). .76 .95 1.16 1.40 1.53 Average (Ends) . . .81 1.05 1.21 1.40 1.71 Maximum 94 1.16 1.43 1.78 2.03 Minimum 65 .78 .89 1.10 1.10 Correction 04 .03 .04 .04 .03 Salmon Average (Bodies). .81 1.02 1.14 1.33 1.68 Average (Ends) . . .84 1.03 1.22 1.44 1.77 Maximum 1.60 1.28 1.42 1.86 2.09 Minimum 65 .78 .90 1.12 1.46 Correction 00 .00 .00 .00' .00 Tuna Fish Average (Bodies). .84 1.02 1.21 1.32 1.82 Average (Ends) . . .88 1.05 1.16 1.40 1.66 Maximum 1.60 1.28 1.45 1.68 2.20 Minimum 67 .83 .96 .81 1.40 Correction ... .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Grand Average 79 1.00 1.16 1.37 1.67 Maximum 1.33 1.98 2.54 2.67 2.50 Minimum 51 .61 .71 .85 1.05 Correction 04 .04 .04 .04 .04 F 2.10 1.80 2.08 2.98 1.41 .04 1.84 2.13 2.62 1.54 .03 1.75 1.97 2.26 1.18 .04 1.92 1.87 2.35 1.42 .04 1.86 2.09 2.59 1.45 .00 1.99 2.03 2.70 1.56 .00 1.93 2.92 1.17 .05 G 3.00 2.71 2.88 4.85 2.08 .05 2.93 2.99 5.54 2.30 .03 2.59 3.21 4.65 2.15 .05 2.57 2.92 4.70 2.10 .03 3.23 3.32 5.38 2.25 .00 2.69 3.05 4.71 1.92 .00 2.93 6.75 1.55 .05 APPENDIX F 333 AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS— Continued Third, Inspection, April 10, 1916 Pour ids per Basi 2 Box A B C D E p G Made for .90 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.80 2.10 3.00 Michigan Apples Average (Bodies) . .71 .91 1.10 1.24 1.56 ' 1.79 2.83 Average (Ends) . . . 1 t 1.02 1.19 1.41 1.65 1.92 3.12 Maximum .98 1.27 1.46 1.63 2.02 2.29 5.14 Minimum .59 .72 .95 1.06 1.28 1.56 2.08 Correction .06 .05 .05 .05 .05 .06 .06 New York Apples Average (Bodies) . .(54 .83 .96 1.23 1.53 1.72 2.55 Average (Ends) . . .69 .95 1.12 1.35 1.60 1.92 2.82 Maximum .84 1.24 1.49 1.61 2.05 2.50 3.88 Minimum .53 .63 .88 1.08 1.33 1.43 2.13 .12 .12 .12 .12 .13 .13 .14 Pennsylvania Apples Average (Bodies) . .70 .85 1.07 1.25 1.55 1.75 2.71 Average (Ends) . . .76 .97 1.18 1.40 1.66 1.86 2.90 Maximum .96 1.19 1.42 1.70 1.96 4t.4i4/ 5.93 Minimum .55 .67 .80 1.05 1.35 1.44 . 2.10 .06 .06 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 String Beans Average (Bodies) . .69 .88 1.11 1.23 1.56 1.86 2.47 Average (Ends) . . .76 .97 1.10 1.35 1.67 1.86 2.97 Maximum .94 1.23 1.42 1.72 2.09 2.35 4.30 Minimum .55 .65 .79 1.05 1.25 1.37 .98 Correction ' .08 .09 .10 .09 .11 .12 .13 Cider Average (Bodies) . .74 .97 1.13 1.32 1.76 1.84 3.14 Average (Ends) . . .78 .99 1.15 1.42 1.66 2.03 2.77 Maximum .94 1.23 1.46 1.77 2.15 2.51 6.03 Minimum .53 .70 .88 1.10 1.25 1.43 2.13 .06 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 Clam Juice Average (Bodies) . .84 1.03 1.25 1.44 1.75 1.92 2.68 Average (Ends) . . .87 1.10 1.26 1.47 1.76 1.91 2.97 Maximum 1.25 1.37 1.51 2.01 2.26 2.50 3.99 Minimum .69 .86 .98 1.25 1.46 1.59 2.03 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .02 Evaporated Milk Average (Bodies) . .78 .91 1.16 1.42 1.83 1.93 3.27 Average (Ends) . . .80 1.01 1.20 1.42 1.71 2.02 3.00 .99 1.26 1.47 1.66 2.18 2.55 5.24 Minimum. M .79 .95 1.25 1.35 1.35 2.32 .06 .06 .05 .05 .05 .04 .05 334 APPENDIX F AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS— Continued Third Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued A Made for 90 Illinois Pumpkin Average (Bodies) . .69 Average (Ends) . . .?2 Maximum .93 Minimum 54 Correction 14 Michigan Pumpkin Average (Bodies) . .71 Average (Ends) . . .77 Maximum 93 Minimum 56 Correction 12 New York Pumpkin Average (Bodies) . .77 Average (Ends) . . .80 Maximum 1.06 Minimum 59 Correction 05 Indiana Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .77 Average (Ends) . . .79 Maximum 1.02 Minimum 63 Correction 06 Maryland Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .79 Average (Ends) . . .80 Maximum 1.04 Minimum 63 Correction 05 New Jersey Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .79 Average (Ends) . . .80 Maximum 92 Minimum Q6 Correction 05 Grand Average 76, Maximum 1.25 Minimum 53 Correction 07 B Pounds C per Base D Box E p G 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.80 2.10 3.00 .79 .96 1.10 1.41 1.68 2.50 .88 .96 1.14 1.47 1.67 " 2.97 1.20 1.21 1.60 1.98 2.45 5.25 .60 .67 .91 1.04 1.11 1.92 .21 .22 .25 .26 .25 .23 .90 1.05 1.30 1.54 1.86 2.57 1.01 1.10 1.32 1.60 1.84 2.77 1.28 1.30 1.62 1.89 2.49 4.29 .75 .90 .86 1.34 1.41 1.91 .12 .14 .15 .17 .17 .19 .95 1.05 1.31 1.58 1.90 2.78 1.00 1.22 1.39 1.71 2.01 2.97 1.21 1.52 1.75 2.11 2.54 5.22 .82 .85 .97 1.34 1.41 1.90 .04 .05 .04 .04 .04 .12 .94 1.16 1.33 1.67 1.96 2.98 1.05 1.19 1.44 1.74 2.06 3.05 1.25 1.42 1.85 2.21 2.46 5.50 .74 .95 1.07 1.23 1.60 2.24 .04 .04 .04 .04 .04 .05 .98 1.05 1.39 1.67 2.01 2.93 .98 1.19 1.35 1.68 2.09 3.14 1.16 1.97 1.72 2.16 2.77 • 6.30 .78 .82 1.05 1.35 1.47 2.01 .05 .05 .04 .04 .04 .04 1.00 1.11 1.37 1.63 2.02 2.78 1.01 1.20 1.40 1.69 2.00 2.92 1.37 1.45 1.70 2.03 2.51 5.20 .82 .87 1.09 1.18 1.53 2.06 .05 .04 .04 .04 .04 .03 .96 1.12 1.33 1.64 1.90 2.87 1.37 1.97 2.01 2.26 2.77 6.30 .60 .67 .86 1.04 1.11 .98 .07 .07 .08 .08 .08 .09 APPENDIX F 335 AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1915 r Pounds : per Base i Box A B C D B p G .90 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.80 2.10 3.00 Michigan Apples Average (Bodies) . .73 .90 1.15 1.19 1.52 1.81 2.74 Average (Ends) . . .74 1.03 1.24 1.40 1.61 1.91 3.00 Maximum .98 1.25 1.53 1.56 2.17 2.30 4.75 Minimum .57 .58 .97 .88 1.18 1.26 1.13 Correction .05 .06 .06 .05 .05 .05 .05 New York Apples . Average (Bodies) . .67 .77 1.01 1.26 1.55 1.78 2.63 Average (Ends) . . .73 .94 1.03 1.30 1.60 1.84 2.80 Maximum .99 1.11 1.26 1.60 1.85 2.31 4.47 Minimum .53 .62 .83 1.02 1.18 1.46 2.12 Correction .11 .12 .13 .11 .14 .13 .15 Pennsylvania Apples Average (Bodies) . .75 .92 1.10 1.32 1.55 1.90 2.40 Average (Ends) . . .79 1.00 1.17 1.35 1.64 1.95 3.21 Maximum .96 1.26 1.38 1.65 1.93 2.66 4.63 Minimum .49 .73 .83 1.17 1.35 1.54 2.05 Correction .05 .05 .05 .05 .06 .05 .05 String Beans Average (Bodies) . . t 4/ .94 1.04 1.30 1.64 1.78 2.33 Average (Ends) . . .73 .96 1.10 1.31 1.54 1.87 2.90 Maximum .93 1.14 1.40 1.54 2.32 2.35 4.65 Minimum .60 .70 .75 1.02 1.10 1.53 1.87 ■ .08 .08 .10 .10 .13 .12 .14 Cider Average (Bodies) . .75 1.01 1.13 1.39 1.63 1.96 2.80 Average (Ends) . . iviv . i i 1.05 1.23 1.45 1.70 1.97 2,97 Maximum .96 1.59 1.38 1.77 - 2.15 2.55 4,19 Minimum .52 .64 .93 1.14 1.22 1.52 2.27 .07 .06 .06 .06 .06 .07 .07 Clam Juice Average (Bodies) . .87 1.08 1.17 1.45 1.71 1.89 2.50 Average (Ends) . . .87 1.12 1.31 1.45 1.79 2.01 2.93 Maximum 1.04 1.45 1.63 1.95 2.40 2.58 5.20 Minimum .70 .92 .97 1.03 1.36 1.45 2.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .02 Condensed Milk Average (Bodies) . .81 1.04 1.14 1.32 1.68 1.78 2.44 Average (Ends) . . .88 1.06 1.21 1.40 1.72 1.79 3.07 Maximum 1.45 1.36 1.43 1.59 2.01 2.31 6.34 Minimum-. .63 .83 .96 1.16 1.37 1.33 1.95 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Evaporated Milk Average (Bodies). .82 .97 1.23 1.37 1.75 1.98 2.58 Average (Ends) . . .80 1.07 1.21 1.42 1.72 2.00 2.93 Maximum .96 1.32 1.63 1.85 2.25 2.56 5.62 Minimum .70 .77 .90 1.10 1.35 1.56 2.00 .06 .06 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 336 APPENDIX F AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS— Continued Fourth Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued — Pounds per Base Box - C D E 1.30 1.50 1.80 A B Made for 90 1.10 Peas Average (Bodies). .83 1.02 1.23 1.44 1.65 Average (Ends) . . .85 1.08 1.28 1.44 1.78 Maximum 1.04 1.36 4.18 1.94 2.20 Minimum 66 .76 .97 1.13 1.31 Correction 01 .01 .01 .01 .01 Illinois Pumpkin Average (Bodies). .74 .79 .94 1.15 1.42 Average (Ends) . . .71 .83 .96 1.13 1.43 Maximum 87 1.06 1.15 1.50 1.81 Minimum 57 .55 .59 .89 1.05 Correction 19 .24 .26 .30 .29 Michigan Pumpkin Average (Bodies). .68 .85 1.00 1.16 1.49 Average (Ends) . . .73 .91 1.09 1.22 1.49 Maximum ........ .86 1.23 1.36 1.62 1.88 Minimum 57 .66 .81 .88 1.11 Correction .12 .14 .17 .19 .19 New York Pumpkin Average (Bodies). .75 .99 1.07 1.35 1.66 Average (Ends) . . .82 .99 1.22 1.47 1.77 Maximum 1.00 1.84 1.64 2.50 2.22 Minimum 55 .77 .75 1.05 1.43 Correction 06 .05 .06 .05 .04 Indiana Tomatoes Average (Bodies). .83 .96 1.15 1.40 1.61 Average (Ends) .. .84 1.05 1.23 1.42 1.72 Maximum 1.02 1.23 1.60 1.65 2.00 Minimum - .63 .75 .97 1.20 1.40 Correction 05 .05 .04 .04 .04 Maryland Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .78 .97 1.15 1.37 1.73 Average (Ends) . . .83 1.03 1.23 1.41 1.77 Maximum 98 1.30 1.57 1.65 2.35 Minimum QG .78 .87 1.16 1.37 Correction 05 .05 .05 .04 .04 New Jersey Tomatoes Average (Bodies). .85 .96 1.07 1.30 1.65 Average (Ends) . . .79 1.00 1.26 1.45 1.75 Maximum .' . . . 1.67 1.17 1.58 1.68 2.18 Minimum. 56 .67 .87 1.10 1.28 Correction 05 .04 .04 .04 .04 Grand Average 78 .98 1.15 1.35 1.64 Maximum 1.67 1.84 4.18 2.50 2.40 Minimum 49 .55 .59 .88 1.05 Correction 06 .07 .07 .07 .08 F 2.10 1.98 2.02 2.85 1.55 .01 1.72 1.75 2.60 1.15 .30 1.67 1.89 2.44 1.30 .18 2.05 2.05 2.63 1.42 .07 1.88 2.05 2.66 1.58 .04 1.97 2.12 2.78 1.42 .04 2.02 2.08 2.91 1.68 .04 1.92 - 2.91 1.15 .08 G 3.00 2.65 3.03 6.72 1.20 .01 2.79 2.88 4.32 1.90 .34 2,46 2.77 4.65 .94 .23 2.63 2.92 6.57 1.80 .12 2.87 2.93 5.70 2.12 .04 2.77 3.10 6.50 1.94 .04 3.01 2.92 5.40 2.16 .04 2.80 6.72 .94 .09 APPENDIX F 337 AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 Made for. Michigan Apples Average (Bodies) . Average (Ends) . . Maximum Minimum Correction New York Apples Average (Bodies). Average (Ends) . Maximum Minimum Correction Pennsylvania Apples Average (Bodies) . Average (Ends) . Maximum Minimum Correction String Beans Average (Bodies) . Average (Ends) . , Maximum Minimum Correction Cider Average (Bodies) . Average (Ends) . , Maximum Minimum Correction Clam Juice Average (Bodies) . Average (Ends) . , Maximum 1 Minimum Correction Condensed Milk Average (Bodies) Average (Ends) . Maximum Minimum Correction Illinois Pumpkin Average (Bodies) Average (Ends) . Maximum Minimum Correction ....... A B Pounds C per Base D Box E F G .90 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.80 2.10 3.00 .71 .90 1.06 1.20 1.53 1.73 2.80 .80 1.05 1.19 1.40 1.72 1.93 3.07 .99 1.26 1.48 1.65 2.15 2.38 5.60 .55 .69 .74 .83 1.22 1.45 1.77 .05 .05 .04 .05 .05 .05 .06 .59 .80 .91 1.11 1.43 1.71 2.58 .67 .93 1:09 1.29 1.61 1.83 2.91 .98 1.12 1.37 1.47 1.98 2.25 3.93 .45 .64 .68 .77 1.14 1.28 1.97 .12 .12 .13 .13 .12 .13 .13 .07 .82 1.02 1.26 1.57 1.74 2.76 .83 .99 1.19 1.38 1.68 1.93 2.93 .95 1.33 1.58 1.83 2.02 2.90 5.67 .48 .59 .83 1.00 1.37 1.45 1.65 .06 .06 .06 .06 .05 .05 .05 .78 .94 1.11 1.29 . 1.54 1.75 2.67 .77 .96 1.11 1.29 1.61 1.88 2.73 .96 1.21 1.42 1.59 2.04 2.46 4.03 ,61 .62 .76 1.03 1.24 1.35 2.14 .10 .11 .11 .12 .13 .14 .10 .78 1.02 1.08 1.34 1.59 1.84 2.79 .76 1.00 1.13 1.39 1.72 1.98 2,76 .98 1.24 1.40 1.73 2.05 2.46 5.71 .63 .73 .89 1.13 1.31 1.53 2.04 .07 .06 .06 .06 .08 .07 .07 .88 1.07 1.24 1.43 1.68 1.83 2.92 .84 1.09 1.23 1.43 1.74 1.88 2.94 ..04 1.45 1.59 2.21 2.08 2.21 4.49 .69 .87 1.06 1.17 1.42 1.45 2.29 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .82 .96 1.12 1.30 1.56 2.04 2.86 .79 1.05 1.24 1.38 1.78 1.92 2.76 .98 1.20 1.40 1.54 1.98 3.35 4.09 .67 .74 1.03 1.18 1.33 1.41 2.05 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .64 .71 .86 ' 1.00 1.22 1.55 2.45 .65 .78 .87 1.08 1.32 1.66 2.54 .80 1.06 1.16 1.50 1.75 2.41 4.81 .51 .51 .61 .72 .85 1.20 1.83 .20 .25 .'26 .32 .30 .34 .33 338 APPENDIX F AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS— Continued Fifth Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued A B Made for 90 1.10 Michigan Pumpkin Average (Bodies) . .65 .87 Average (Ends) .. .70 .88 Maximum 96 1.16 Minimum 51 .67 Correction 13 .14 New York Pumpkin Average (Bodies) . .75 .99 Average (Ends) .. .77 1.01 Maximum 98 1.33 Minimum 61 .74 Correction 08 .06 Indiana Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .67 .95 Average (Ends) . . .79 .99 Maximum 95 1.16 Minimum 50 .68 Correction 05 .04 Maryland Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .71 .96 Average (Ends) . . .80 1.02 Maximum 1.18 1.38 Minimum 48 .85 Correction 05 .04 New Jersey Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .70 .95 Average (Ends) . . .80 1.02 Maximum 97 1.20 Minimum .54 .68 Correction 05 .05 Salmon Average (Bodies). .77 1.03 Average (Ends) . . , .83 1.04 Maximum 1.16 1.76 Minimum 64 .81 Correction 03 .03 Tuna Fish Average (Bodies) . . . "... Average (Ends) . . .78 1.01 Maximum 90 1.28 Minimum 70 .50 Correction 00 .00 Grand Average 75 .96 Maximum 1.18 1.76 Minimum 15 .50 Correction 07 '.07 — Pounds per Base Box- C D E 1.30 1.50 1.80 .93 1.01 1.32 .75 .17 1.06 1.14 1.37 .80 .06 1.13 1.11 1.42 .85 .04 1.12 1.22 1.47 .93 .04 1.12 1.16 1.55 .68 .04 1.17 1.23 1.43 .96 .04 1.15 1.40 .95 .00 1.10 1.59 .61 .07 1.06 1.18 1.47 .78 .18 1.37 1.38 1.71 1.11 .05 1.32 1.40 1.65 1.03 .04 1.29 1.36 1.87 .98 .04 1.37 1.39 1.85 1.03 .04 1.41 1.47 1.73 1.19 .02 1.39 1.58 1.18 .00 1.31 2.21 .72 .08 1.42 1.43 1.80 1.11 .20 1.68 1.64 1.95 1.24 .05 1.51 1.69 2.12 .76 .03 1.62 1.69 2.46 1.33 .04 1.61 1.69 2.00 1.37 .03 1.57 1.70 2.04 1.41 .03 1.65 1.87 1.41 .00 1.59 2.46 .76 .08 p 2.10 1.69 1.70 2.56 1.35 .22 1.87 1.93 2.52 1.38 .07 2.08 2.02 2.53 1.35 .03 1.80 1.96 2.65 '1.38 .04 1.91 1.98 2.68 1.33 .04 1.82 2.04 2.63 1.55 .03 2.07 2.80 1.80 .00 1.86 3.35 1.20 .08 G 3.00 2.29 2.6^ 4.76 1.85 .24 2.58 2.76 3.64 1.97 .17 2.89 3.03 5.38 1.98 .03 3.18 3.11 5.68 2.18 .03 2.60 2.87 5.00 2.10 .04 3.51 2.98 6.23 2.09 .02 2.70 3.80 2.05 .00 2.32 6.23 1.65 .09 APPENDIX F 339 AVERAGE, MAXIMUM [ AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS — Continued Sixth Inspection, ! September 18, 1916 ■ Pounds ! per Base Box , * A B C D E p G Made for .90 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.80 2.10 3.00 Michigan Apples Average (Bodies) . .0-1 .80 1.00 1.18 1.48 1.70 2.74 Average (Ends) . . .74 .96 1.14 1.33 1.63 1.84 2.89 Maximum 1.84 1.12 1.32 1.79 2.03 2.57 4.24 Minimum .55 .06 .54 .05 .81 .05 .89 .05 1.18 .05 .81 .05 1.95 Correction .05 New York Apples Average (Bodies) . .65 .82 1.00 1.20 1.48 1.74 3.26 Average (Ends) . . .69 .92 1.06 1.28 1.55 1.76 3.14 Maximum 1.62 1.13 1.42 1.67 1.88 2.28 6.21 Minimum .51 .65 .72 .95 1.19 .94 1.84 Correction .11 .12 .13 .12 .13 .11 .14 Pennsylvania Apples Average (Bodies) . .69 .83 1.12 1.21 1.57 1.74 2.48 Average (Ends) . . .75 .94 1.12 1.35 1.57 1.84 2.93 Maximum .87 1.08 1.41 1.63 1.81 2.38 3.75 Minimum .58 .70 .84 1.03 1.20 1.32 2.02 Correction .06 .06 .05 .06 .06 .06 .05 String Beans Average (Bodies) . .76 .97 1.09 1.22 1.50 1.90 2.90 Average (Ends) . . .79 .96 1.12 1.33 1.57 1.91 2.81 Maximum .9.8 1.40 1.35 1.65 1.88 2.40 5.48 Minimum .60 .65 .82 1.00 .90 1.40 1.80 .12 .13 .14 .14 .17 .17 .18 Cider Average (Bodies) . .73 .91 1.11 1.35 1.51 1.80 2.94 Average (Ends) . . .74 .93 1.12 1.39 1.62 1.96 3.04 Maximum 1.00 1.10 1.43 1.67 2.10 2.44 6.08 Minimum .51 .65 .75 .98 1.25 1.45 1.98 Correction .09 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 Clam Juice Average (Bodies) . .82 1.04 1.19 1.44 1.68 1.85 2.56 Average (Ends) . . .85 1.08 1.27 1.46 1.74 1.96 3.17 1.10 1.32 1.50 1.75 2.05 2.40 4.70 Minimum .70 .76 .93 1.15 1.30 1.46 1.95 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 Illinois Pumpkin Average (Bodies) . .55 .66 .75 .92 1.24 1.47 2.47 Average (Ends) . . .58 .74 .81 .98 1.23 1.55 2.51 Maximum .72 .87 1.03 1.27 1.50 2.04 5.25 Minimum .44 .54 .57 .71 .84 1.12 1.72 Correction .21 .31 .34 .36 .41 .43 M 340 APPENDIX F AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COATING ON CANS— Continued Sixth Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued ■ Pounds ; per Base ; Box A B C D E F G Made for .90 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.80 2.10 3.00 Michigan Pumpkin Average (Bodies) . .56 .75 .87 1.06 1.35 1.55 2.34 Average (Ends) . . .65 .85 .95 1.08 1.33 1.64 2.66 .94 1.07 1.36 1.40 1.84 2.23 5.35 .45 .17 .48 .17 M .22 .79 .25 .88 .27 1.12 .28 1.76 .31 New York Pumpkin Average (Bodies) . .69 .91 1.01 1.30 1.52 1.92 2.67 Average (Ends) . . .73 .93 1.06 1.34 1.62 1.88 2.84 .88 1.46 1.47 1.72 2.00 2.42 4.98 Minimum .51 .73 .82 .95 1.15 1.29 2.03 .09 .08 .09 .07 .07 .09 .21 Indiana Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .73 .95 1.13 1.34 1.66 1.68 2.57 Average (Ends) . . .80 1.00 1.16 1.36 1.68 2.01 2.97 1.28 1.42 1.55 1.68 2.02 2.70 4.18 Minimum .60 .75 .88 1.05 1.02 1.35 1.98 .06 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .04 Maryland Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .83 .93 1.17 1.33 1.57 1.97 2.83 Average (Ends) . . .77 1.03 1.14 1.42 1.65 1.99 3.11 Maximum 1.05 1.28 1.48 1.78 2.02 2.46 5.08 Minimum .63 .06 .60 .06 .85 .05 1.10 .05 1.30 .05 1.58 .04 2.2-5 .04 New Jersey Tomatoes Average (Bodies) . .75 .94 1.10 1.22 1.51 1.95 2.64 Average (Ends) . . .84 1.01 1.21 1.37 1.70 2.00 2.99 Maximum 1.00 1.20 1.43 1.86 2.06 2.56 5.50 Minimum .61 .70 .88 1.03 1.26 1.35 2.03 .05 .05 .04 .04 .04 .04 .01 Grand Average .- .72 .91 1.07 1.27 1.54 1.82 2.81 Maximum 1.84 1.46 1.55 1.86 2.10 2.70 6.24 Minimum .44 .48 .57 .71 .84 .81 1.72 .09 .10 .10 .10 .11 .12 .13 While the maximum and minimum results shown, in nearly all cases represent the variation in the weight of coating on the original plate, it is recognized that in a few instances extreme results, such as the minimum G in the third inspection, the maximum C and minimum G in the fourth inspection, and the maximum A in the sixth inspection, are probably due to errors, which it was impossible to entirely eliminate in an investigation of this magnitude, consisting of approximately 37,000 analyses of tin plate. APPENDIX G APPENDIX G— PERFORATIONS AND PITTINGS IN APPLE CANS PERFORATIONS AND PITTINGS FOUND IN ONE CAN OF EACH COATING WEIGHT CONTAINING PENNSYLVANIA APPLES W-l * * * * W-2 — * * * — * * * — — — — X-l * * * * * * * * X-3 * * — — — # * * Y-l * * — * : — — — * * * — — . — . — Y-4 * * * * — * * * . — _ * — — — * Z-l — * * * * * * * * *4 7 *4 6 " *1 5 *3 6 *1 5 *0 1 *1 2 —3 —3 1 —6 2 —4 1 —6 2 —7 6 —6 5 Total Total number showing- Total number number of cans perforations Percentage showing pitting Percentage 49 14 28.6 32 65.3 — Indicates "No Perforations or No Pitting." * Indicates "Perforations or Pitting." 341 APPENDIX H APPENDIX H— DATA ON CONDITION OF INDIVIDUAL CANS AND CONTENTS AT DIFFERENT INSPECTIONS INSPECTION DATA— MICHIGAN APPLES First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Can Lot Number W-l-A 1 2 W-l-B 1 2 W-l-C 1 2 W-l-D 1 2 W-l-E 1 • 2 W-l-F 1 2 W-l-G 1 2 W-2-A 1 2 W-2-B 1 2 W-2-C 1 2 W-2-D 1 2 W-2-E 1 2 W-2-F 1 2 W-2-G 1 2 X-l-A 1 2 X-l-B 1 2 X-l-C - 1 2 X-l-D 1 2 X-l-E 1 2 X-l-F 1 2 X-l-G 1 2 X-3-A 1 2 X-3-B 1 2 X-3-C 1 2 X-3-D 1 2 342 Vacuum Inches 8 Lot X-3-E Can Number 1 Vacuum Inches 10 7 7 X-3-F 2 1 10 10 10 10 X-3-G 2 1 10 11 12 6 9 Y-l-A 2 1 10 11 11 10 Y-l-B 2 1 10 7 10 8 Y-l-C 2 1 10 11 11 12 Y-l-D 2 1 10 10 11 Y-l-E 2 1 10 8 11 11 Y-l-F 2 1 11 9 10 9 Y-l-G 2 1 3 12 10 10 10 Y-4-A 2 1 12 11 11 10 Y-4-B 2 1 12 7 9 10 Y-4-C 2 1 8 10 13 11 Y-4-D 2 1 10 13 10 Y-4-E 2 1 12 10 10 10 Y-4-F 2 1 11 11 11 9 Y-4-G 2 1 10 10 7 7 9 Z-l-A 2 1 8 10 7 10 Z-l-B 2 . 1 10 11 11 10 Z-l-C 2 1 11 10 10 10 Z-l-D 2 1 10 13 10 Z-l-E 2 1 9 11 11 10 Z-l-F 2 1 10 8 10 9 Z-l-G 2 1 9 9 10 9 11 2 11 APPENDIX H 343 INSPECTION DATA— MICHIGAN APPLES— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Can 'Lot Number W-l-A 3 4 W-l-B 3 4 W-l-C 3 4 W-l-D 3 4 W-l-E 3 4 W-l-F 3 4 W-l-G 3 4 W-2-A 3 4 W-2-B 3 4 W-2-C 3 4 W-2-D 3 4 W-2-E r . . 3 4 W-2-F 3 4 W-2-G 3 4 X-l-A 3 4 X-l-B 3 4 X-l-C 3 4 X-l-D 3 4 X-l-E 3 4 X-l-F 3 4 X-l-G 3 4 X-3-A 3 '4 X-3-B 3 4 X-3-C 3 4 X-3-D 3 4 Vacuum Inches 10 Lot X-3-E Can Number 3 Vacuum Inches 10 12 10 X-3-F 4 3 10 8 8 11 X-3-G 4 3 11 9 12 8 12 Y-l-A 4 3 12 10 10 11 Y-l-B 4 3 10 8 3 10 Y-l-C 4 3 9 10 10 13 Y-l-D 4 3 10 10 13 Y-l-E 4 3 10 10 11 11 Y-l-F 4 3 11 11 10 11 Y-l-G 4 3 11 12 11 10 10 Y-4-A 4 ..... 3 10 11 11 11 Y-4-B 4 3 9 11 10 8 Y-4-C 4 3 11 11 11 9 Y-4-D 4 3 12 13 11 Y-4-E 4 3 15 13 11 10 Y-4-F 4 3 11 10 12 11 Y-4-G 4 3 11 13 6 10 9 Z-l-A 4 3 11 10 11 10 Z-l-B 4 3 11 12 11 13 Z-l-C 4 3 12 10 8 12 Z-l-D 4 3 13 11 12 Z-l-E 4 3 14 11 11 11 Z-l-F 4 3 11 10 11 10 Z-l-G 4 3 11 10 10 11 11 4 11 344 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MICHIGAN APPLES— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 5 6 W-l-B 5 6 W-l-C 5 6 W-l-D 5 6 W-l-E 5 6 W-l-F 5 6 W-l-G 5 6 W-2-A 5 6 W-2-B 5 6 W-2-C 5 6 W-2-D 5 6 W-2-E 5 6 W-2-F 5 6 W-2-G 5 6 X-l-A 5 6 X-l-B 5 6 X-l-C 5 . 6 X-l-D 5 6 X-l-E 5 6 X-l-F 5 6 X-l-G 5 6 X-3-A 5 6 X-3-B 5 6 X-3-C 5 6 X-3-D 5 6 Vacuum Inches 12 Lot X-3-E Can Number 5 Vacuum, Inches 11 9 8 X-3-F 6 5 10 10 10 11 X-3-G 6 5 11 11 11 11 9 Y-l-A 6 5 10 11 10 12 Y-l-B ... .. 6 5 11 11 11 10 Y-l-C 6 5 11 12 11 12 Y-l-D 6 5 11 11 10 Y-l-E 6 5 10 12 10 10 Y-l-F 6 5 12 12 8 11 Y-l-G 6 5 12 13 12 13 12 Y-4-A 6 ' 5 14 13 10 12 Y-4-B 6 5 10 10 10 13 Y-4-C 6 5 12 10 12 10 Y-4-D 6 5 11 11 3 Y-4-E 6 5 10 12 11 13 Y-4-F 6 5 13 10 12 10 Y-4-G 6 5 11 12 12 10 11 Z-l-A ..... 6 5 12 12 10 12 Z-l-B 6 5 12 13 10 13 Z-l-C 6 5 13 11 11 12 Z-l-D 6 5 10 12 12 Z-l-E 6 5 11 12 11 12 Z-l-F 6 5 12 11 12 12 Z-l- G 6 5 11 12 11 11 12 6 11 APPENDIX H 345 INSPECTION DATA— MICHIGAN APPLES— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 Lot W-l-A . . . Can Number 9 Vacuum Inches 13 W-l-B 10 9 19 11 W-l-C 10 9 10 11 W-l-D ... 10 9 11 12 W-l-E 10 9 12 12 W-l-F 10 9 11 11 W-l-G 10 9 9 11 W-2-A ... 10 9 11 12 W-2-B 10 9 12 12 W-2-C 10 9 11 8 W-2-D 10 9 6 11 W-2-E 10 9 11 9 W-2-F 10 9 10 10 W-2-G 10 9 11 10 X-l-A 10 9 13 11 X-l-B :... 10 9 12 11 X-l-C 10 9 11 10 X-l-D .... 10 9 10 10 X-l-E .... 10 9 10 10 X-l-F .... 10 9 10 12 X-l-G .... 10 9 11 11 X-3-A 10 9 10 o X-3-B 10 9 10 10 X-3-C .... 10 9 11 9 X-3-D .... 10 9 10 11 10 10 Lot X-3-E Can Number 9 Vacuum Inches 10 X-3-F 10 9 9 10 X-3-G 10 9 11 10 Y-l-A 10 9 11 11 Y-l-B 10 9 10 10 Y-l-C 10 9 11 12 Y-l-D 10 9 12 11 Y-l-E 10 9 11 10 Y-l-F 10 9 11 12 Y-l-G 10 9 10 14 Y-4-A 10 9 13 11 Y-4-B 10 9 11 10 Y-4-C 10 9 11 10 Y-4-D 10 9 11 15 Y-4-E 10 9 11 12 Y-4-F 10 9 10 11 Y-4-G 10 9 10 11 Z-l-A 10 9 11 9 Z-l-B 10 9 10 10 Z-l-C 10 9 11 10 Z-l-D 10 9 10 11 Z-l-E 10 9 4 13 Z-l-F 10 9 12 11 Z-l-G 10 9 12 10 10 11 346 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MICHIGAN APPLES— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A .7 8 W-l-B 7 8 W-l-C 7 8 W-l-D 7 8 W-l-E 7 8 W-l-F 7 8 W-l-G 7 8 W-2-A 7 8 W-2-B 7 8 W-2-C 7 8 W-2-D . . 7 8 W-2-E 7 8 W-2-F 7 8 W-2-G 7 8 X-l-A 7 8 X-l-B 7 8 X-l-C 7 8 X-l-D 7 8 X-l-E 7 8 X-l-F 7 8 X-l-G 7 8 X-3-A 7 8 X-3-B 7 8 X-3-C 7 8 X-3-D 7 8 Vacuum Inches 12 Lot X-3-E Can Number 7 Vacuum Inches 8 7 10 X-3-F 8 7 9 12 10 X-3-G 8 7 11 3 11 10 11 Y-l-A ..... 8 7 11 11 12 11 Y-l-B 8 7 10 10 9 11 Y-l-C 8 7 11 9 11 11 Y-l-D 8 7 10 10 13 Y-l-E 8 7 10 11 10 11 Y-l-F 8 7 10 10 11 10 Y-l-G 8 7 11 11 10 12 10 Y-4-A 8 7 12 3 12 12 12 12 Y-4-B Y-l-C 8 7 8 7 10 9 11 10 12 10 Y-l-D 8 ..... 7 11 12 11 Y-4-E 8 7 11 11 10 11 Y-4-F 8 7 12 9 9 8 Y-4-G 8 7 11 11 8 10 10 Z-l-A 8 7 11 11 10 10 Z-l-B 8 ..... 7 11 10 11 10 Z-l-C 8 7 10 12 10 11 Z-l-D 8 7 10 12 11 Z-l-E 8 7 10 4 11 10 Z-l-F 8 7 10 9 10 9 Z-l-G 8 7 10 10 11 3 11 8 11 APPENDIX H 34? INSPECTION DATA— MICHIGAN APPLES— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 9 10 W-l-B 9 10 W-l-C 9 10 W-l-D 9 10 W-l-E 9 10 W-l-F 9 10 W-l-G 9 10 W-2-A 9 10 W-2-B 9 10 W-2-C 9 10 W-2-D 9 10 W-2-E 9 10 W-2-F 9 10 W-2-G 9 10 X-l-A 9 10 X-l-B 9 10 X-l-C 9 10 X-l-D 9 10 X-l-E 9 10 X-l-F 9 10 X-l-G 9 10 X-3-A 9 10 X-3-B 9 10 X-3-C 9 10 X-3-D 9 10 Vacuum Inches 7 Lot X-3-E Can Number 9 Vacuum Inches 8 9 6 X-3-F 10 9 8 10 6 10 X-3-G 10 9 10 8 10 8 9 Y-l-A 10 9 8 6 8 8 Y-l-B 10 9 7 8 8 8 Y-l-C 10 9 11 9 4 10 Y-l-D 10 9 8 10 7 Y-l-E 10 9 9 7 10 8 Y-l-F 10 9 8 9 11 10 Y-l-G 10 9 8 11 8 8 9 Y-4-A 10 9 10 7 . 8 10 Y-4-B 10 9 10 9 8 6 Y-4-C 10 9 9 9 10 8 Y-4-D 10 9 9 9 9 Y-l-E 10 ...*.. 9 11 9 10 10 Y-4-F 10 9 11 9 8 6 Y-4-G 10 9 10 10 8 8 8 Z-l-A 10 9 10 6 8 9 Z-l-B 10 9 6 11 8 9 Z-l-C 10 9 11 5 9 9 Z-l-D 10 9 8 11 10 Z-l-E 10 9 6 6 10 6 Z-l-F 10 ..... 9 6 6 10 9 Z-l-G 10 9 9 10 10 10 10 9 11 348 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— NEW YORK APPLES First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot W-l-A Can Number 15 Vacuum Inches 4 4 4 4 5 6 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 5 4 2 5 4 4 4 4 5 3 5 4 4 3 3 3 5 6 5 5 5 4 6 5 5 4 4 Lot X-3-E Can Number 7 Vacuum Inches 3 W-l-B 16 2 X-3-F 10 9 5 5 W-l-C 4 1 X-3-G 10 8 4 4 W-l-D 3 14 Y-l-A ..... 9 7 4 16 19 4 W-l-E Y-l-B 12 11 4 20 1 5 W-l-F Y-l-C 12 23 5 2 1 5 W-l-G Y-l-D 24 23 3 2 1 4 W-2-A Y-l-E 24 13 5 4 W-2-B . 2 1 Y-l-F 14 15 2 4 W-2-C . 2 21 24 15 Y-l-G 16 16 4 4 W-2-D Y-4-A 20 23 4 18 1 5 W-2-E Y-4-B 24 13 4 2 18 5 W-2-F Y-4-C 14 13 3 24 15 3 W-2-G Y-4-D 14 20 4 18 13 o X-l-A Y-4-E 24 13 4 X-l-B 14 13 Y-4-F 16 13 2 5 X-l-C 15 13 Y-4-G 16 13 5 4 X-l-D . 14 5 Z-l-A 14 19 4 8 8 4 X-l-E Z-l-B 22 19 1 9 15 4 X-l-F Z-l-C 22 19 4 16 15 X-l-G Z-l-D 22 19 3 16 7 4 X-3-A Z-l-E 22 19 4 3 X-3-B 10 9 Z-l-F 22 15 3 4 X-3-C 12 9 Z-l-G 16 14 5 5 X-3-D 10 9 15 3 10 APPENDIX H 349 INSPECTION DATA— NEW YORK APPLES— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 21 Vacuum Inches 4 4 6 5~ 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 5 2 3 4 4 4 5 5 3 1 5 • 4 5 5 4 5 % 12 6 4 2 ■ 4 5 3 3 4 3 1 5 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 Lot X-3-E Can Number 14 Vacuum Inches 7 W-l-B 22 18 X-3-F 17 8 5 5 W-l-C 19 5 X-3-G 17 10 5 2 W-l-D 11 18 Y-l-A Y-l-B 13 19 20 9 4 W-l-E 24 13 4 3 14 6 3 W-l-F Y-l-C 10 21 5 9 4 5 W-l-G Y-l-D 22 21 3 7 3 10 3 4 W-2-A Y-l-E 22 15 3 5 W-2-B Y-l-F 16 13 5 6 W-2-C 5 15 18 14 Y-l-G ..... 14 13 3 4 W-2-D Y-4-A 14 21 2 21 7 4 W-2-E Y-4-B 22 15 12 6 12 12 3 W-2-F Y-4-C 16 15 3 3 W-2-G Y-4-D 16 15 2 20 9 3 X-l-A Y-4-E Y-4-F 18 19 24 21 4 X-l-B 12 ; 9 6 4 X-l-C 12 9 Y-4-G 22 19 4 X-l-D 12 10 Z-l-A 24 16 4 16 11 4 X-l-E Z-l-B 23 20 1 12 9 5 X-l-F Z-l-C 23 13 4 12 9 5 X-l-G Z-l-D 16 13 1 12 15 3 X-3-A Z-l-E 16 . 13 4 X-3-B 18 13 Z-l-F 16 21 6 X-3-C 15 13 Z-l-G 24 21 4 3 X-3-D 16 13 24 1 16 350 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— NEW YORK APPLES— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 17 Vacuum Inches 4 6 5 6 4 5 5 6 5 5 6 5 5 6 5 5 6 7 5 5 4 5 5 4 6 4 4 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 7 5 5 5 6 5 5 4 5 7 5 5 3 6 Lot X-3-E Can Number 8 Vacuum Inches 5 W-l-B 20 10 X-3-F 9 7 4 6 W-l-C 11 7 X-3-G 11 11 6 4 W-l-D 8 17 Y-l-A 14 23 6 20 16 6 W-l-E Y-l-B 11 5 7 17 3 6 W-l-F Y-l-C 6 17 6 11 5 6 W-l-G Y-l-D 18 17 5 11 5 6 W-2-A Y-l-E 18 17 6 5 W-2-B 11 8 Y-l-F 21 17 6 5 W-2-C 9 23 Y-l-G 18 18 5 5 W-2-D 20 17 Y-4-A 19 17 5 22 4 6 W-2-E Y-4-B 18 17 7 5 16 4 W-2-F Y-4-C 18 17 5 22 10 5 W-2-G Y-4-D 18 14 5 11 11 6 X-l-A Y-4-E 17 14 4 5 X-l-B 16 8 Y-4-F 17 14 6 7 X-l-C 14 11 Y-4-G 17 16 6 6 X-l-D - 15 6 Z-l-A ..... 17 14 6 20 14 6 X-l-E Z-l-B 15 13 5 20 14 11 14 5 X-l-F Z-l-C 14 14 7 5 X-l-G Z-l-D 18 20 4 17 17 6 X-3-A Z-l-E 23 14 6 6 X-3-B 11 8 Z-l-F 17 14 5 6 X-3-C 16 8 Z-l-G 17 17 4 6 11 18 t X-3-D 8 6 11 7 APPENDIX H 351 INSPECTION DATA— NEW YORK APPLES— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 Lot W-l-A .... Can Number 14 Vacuum Inches 3 3 3 2 4 4 4 7 4 4 5 3 3 3 5 5 3 5 3 3 4 4 6 4 3 3 2 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 6 3 5 5 4 1 6 Lot X-3-E Can Number 11 Vacuum Inches 1 5 4 5 4 5 W-l-B 23 17 X-3-F 13 13 W-l-C 24 10 X-3-G 16 ■ 16 W-l-D • 21 21 Y-l-A 17 21 23 ..... 16 5 W-l-E Y-l-B 22 7 23 7 3 4 W-l-F Y-l-C 8 19 8 8 3 4 W-l-G Y-l-D 20 19 12 6 5 W-2-A .... Y-l-E 20 20 5 9 •' 4 5 W-2-B Y-l-F 24 19 5 10 14 4 W-2-C Y-l-G 20 15 5 22 16 4 W-2-D Y-4-A 22 19 4 W 2 F 20 3 W 2 F 11 K Y-4-B 20 19 6 4 W 2 G 11 13 Y-4-C 20 19 1 4 22 8 Y-4-D 20 21 4 4 X-l-A Y-4-E 23 20 4 15 11 5 X-l-B Y-4-F 23 20 3 16 8 4 X-l-C Y-4-G 23 20 5 16 4 4 X-l-D Z-l-A 23 17 1 X-l-E . 14 19 5 X-l-F 21 13 Z-l-B 20 16 4 3 X-l-G 17 8 Z-l-C 18 20 3 4 13 13 Z-l-D 23 15 4 4 X-3-A Z-l-E 18 20 5 14 . 11 4 X-3-B Z-l-F 23 20 14 14 5 X-3-C Z-l-G 23 20 4 17 14 4 X-3-D 23 3 17 352 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— NEW YORK APPLES— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 18 19 W-l-B 8 16 W-l-C 4 12 W-l-D 19 22 W-l-E 21 22 W-l-F 4 5 W-l-G 6 9 W-2-A 4 12 W-2-B 7 12 W-2-C 13 19 W-2-D 19 23 W-2-E 9 10 W-2-F 4 10 W-2-G 7 15 X-l-A 17 18 X-l-B 10 17 X-l-C 10 17 X-l-D 12 18 X-l-E 10 13 X-l-F 1 10 X-l-G 7 10 X-3-A 9 12 X-3-B 7 10 X-3-C 15 18 X-3-D 15 18 Vacuum Inches 3 4 3 6 4 2 4 5 3 3 3 4 1 5 3 4 4 4 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 4 2 4 2 4 3 i 3 2 5 4 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 Lot X-3-E X-3-F X-3-G Y-l-A Y-l-B Y-l-C Y-l-D Y-l-E Y-l-F Y-l-G Y-4-A 14 Y-4-B Y-4-C Y-4-D Y-4-E Y-4-F Y-4-G Z-l-A Z-l-B Z-l-C Z-l-D Z-l-E Z-l-F Z-l-G Can Vacuum Number Inches 12 4 16 4 12 4 14 3 7 4 12 3 9 4 10 3 1 5 2 . 4 15 3 16 3 13 4 14 4 22 3 23 3 23 3 24 6 23 3 24 3 14 3 15 3 23 2 24 23 4 24 3 16 19 2 15 3 18 3 15 5 18 1 15 4 18 21 4 24 3 21 24 4 21 3 44 2 21 7 24 4 21 3 24 1 13 3 18 4 13 4 16 4 APPENDIX H 353 INSPECTION DATA— NEW YORK APPLES— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 9 Vacuum Inches 1 2 2 4 3 4 4 4 . 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 3 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 5 2 4 5 Lot X-3-E W-l-B 10 13 X-3-F W-l-C 22 2 X-3-G W-l-D W-l-E 20 7 10 7 Y-l-A W-l-F 10 21 Y-l-B W-l-G 22 3 Y-l-C W-2-A 15 7 Y-l-D Y-l-E W-2-B 8 6 Y-l-F W-2-C 11 3 Y-l-G W-2-D 6 9 W-2-E 12 19 Y-4-A W-2-F 22 14 Y-4-B W-2-G 20 8 Y-4-C X-l-A 9 3 Y-4-D Y-4-E X-l-B 5 6 Y-4-F X-l-C 7 7 Y-4-G X-l-D 18 9 X-l-E 11 6 Z-l-A X-l-F 7 18 Z-l-B X-l-G 21 3 Z-l-C X-3-A 11 16 Z-l-D Z-l-E X-3-B 22 17 Z-l-F X-3-C 22 20 Z-l-G X-3-D 21 20 21 Can Vacuum Number Inches 1 2 2 2 2 4 3 2 1 4 2 3 1 3 2 3 3 4 2 1 2 2 3 1 3 2 3 1 2 2 1 4 2 4 1 4 2 3 10 2 11 2 1 4 2 3 1 3 2 2 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 4 21 3 22 3 1 3 2 2 7 11 3 10 4 11 2 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 4 19 4 22 4 354 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot W-l-A Can Number 21 Vacuum Inches 5 W-l-B 22 10 3 4 W-l-C 9 21 5 W-l-D 22 11 2 3 W-l-E 12 14 4 4 W-l-F 15 15 4 3 W-l-G 18 14 3 3 W-2-A 17 10 2 3 W-2-B 11 13 3 4 W-2-C 14 23 4 3 W-2-D • 24 13 4 3 W-2-E 15 13 3 W-2-F 15 15 5 3 W-2-G .... 16 21 2 1 X-l-A 22 21 1 2 X-l-B 22 '. 21 3 2 X-l-C 22 22 4 3 X-l-D 23 21 5 3 X-l-E 22 20 2 4 X-l-F 23 21 3 X-l-G 22 21 2 1 X-3-A 22 23 2 1 X-3-B 24 23 3 4 X-3-C 24 23 , 3 4 X-3-D 24 21 5 24 5 Can Lot Number X-3-E 21 22 X-3-F 21 22 X-3-G 23 24 Y-l-A 22 23 Y-l-B 23 24 Y-l-C 21 22 Y-l-D 21 22 • Y-l-E 21 22 Y-l-F 3 4 Y-l-G 3 4 Y-4-A 23 24 Y-l-B 23 24 Y-l-C 1 2 Y-l-D 1 2 Y-l-E 21 22 Y-l-F 21 22 Y-l-G 1 2 Z-l-A 21 22 Z-l-B 21 22 Z-l-C 1 2 Z-l-D 1 2 Z-l-E 1 2 Z-l-F 1 2 Z-l-G 1 2 Vacuum Inches 2 5 4 4 2 4 3 4 6 1 4 4 3 4 3 4 5 3 2 1 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 5 7 4 4 4 4 3 4 APPENDIX H 355 INSPECTION DATA— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 20 Vacuum Inches 5 6 5 2 4 5 6 4 3 . 4 4 6 5 6 3 4 1 4 4 4 4 3 3 5 3 3 2 1 3 1 3 2 3 5 2 7 5 4 4 1 3 4 4 6 5 5 5 4 Lot X-3-E Can Number 20 Vacuum Inches 6 W-l-B 23 11 X-3-F 17 20 5 3 W-l-C 12 23 X-3-G 23 18 4 5 W-l-D 24 10 Y-l-A Y-l-B 17 17 18 18 3 W-l-E 14 13 1 5 11 16 7 W-l-F Y-l-C 21 23 10 17 15 5 W-l-G Y-l-D 24 23 4 16 9 1 W-2-A .... Y-l-E 13 23 3 4 W-2-B 12 15 Y-l-F 24 1 5 5 W-2-C 16 21 Y-l-G 2 1 5 3 W-2-D 22 12 Y-4-A 2 21 14 12 W-2-E Y-4-B 22 21 5 14 17 5 W-2-F Y-4-C 22 3 4 19 23 4 W-2-G Y-4-D 4 3 3 24 20 1 X-l-A Y-4-E 4 23 5 4 X-l-B 23 23 Y-4-F 24 23 3 3 X-l-C 24 21 Y-4-G 24 3 6 5 X-l-D 24 23 Z-l-A 4 16 5 24 21 4 X-l-E Z-l-B 20 23 24 23 3 X-l-F Z-l-C 24 3 4 24 23 6 X-l-G Z-l-D 4 3 24 20 3 X-3-A Z-l-E 4 5 5 6 X-3-B 22 20 Z-l-F 11 5 4 5 X-3-C 22 19 Z-l-G 19 3 5 4 X-3-D 22 . 22 9 6 23 356 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 16 Vacuum Inches 4 6 6 5 5 6 5 4 5 6 4 5 5 5 6 5 5 8 5 5 4 5 6 5 4 3 4 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 4 3 5 5 4 5 3 3 4 7 5 5 5 4 5 6 Lot X-3-E Can Number 23 Vacuum Inches 7 W-l-B 17 5 X-3-F 19 17 6 4 W-l-C 6 17 X-3-G 18 1 4 5 W-l-D 18 9 Y-l-A 19 20 5 13 10 6 W-l-E Y-l-B 17 17 6 12 13 3 W-l-F Y-l-C 19 13 3 14 12 6 W-l-G Y-l-D 14 14 6 13 6 6 W-2-A Y-l-E 15 13 4 5 W-2-B 7 19 Y-l-F 14 5 5 5 W-2-C 18 19 Y-l-G 6 7 5 5 W-2-D ■ 18 9 Y-4-A 6 13 4 10 10 2 W-2-E ..... Y-4-B 14 17 4 11 11 4 W-2-F Y-4-C 20 5 3 14 17 6 W-2-G Y-4-D 6 5 4 18 15 6 X-l-A Y-4-E 6 13 6 7 X-l-B ..... 16 13 Y-4-F 15 .• 17 6 6 X-l-C 14 19 Y-4-G 18 5 6 6 X-l-D 18 17 Z-l-A 6 8 4 18 14 1 X-l-E Z-l-B . 23 17 18 17 X-l-F Z-l-C 16 5 18 17 5 X-l-G Z-l-D 7 7 2 13 17 X-3-A Z-l-E 6 8 3 X-3-B 18 14 Z-l-F 4 3 3 6 X-3-C 16 17 Z-l-G 4 7 3 5 X-3-D 18 16 8 6 20 APPENDIX H 357 INSPECTION DATA— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 15 19 W-l-B 7 8 W-l-C 7 20 W-l-D 7 16 W-l-E 16 17 W-l-F 19 20 W-l-G IS 19 W-2-A 2 8 W-2-B 20 24 W-2-C 14 15 W-2-D 18 16 W-2-E 16 17 W-2-F 18 21 W-2-G 19 20 X-l-A 14 16 X-l-B 18 20 X-l-C 4 20 X-l-D 8 20 X-l-E 19 22 X-l-F 19 20 X-l-G 19 20 X-3-A 15 16 X-3-B 17 21 X-3-C 20 21 X-3-D 15 19 Vacuum Inches 1 Lot X-3-E Can Number 14 Vacuum Inches 3 3 2 X-3-F 24 19 3 3 1 X-3-G 24 21 2 3 2 2 2 Y-l-A 22 14 3 2 3 Y-l-B 19 20 3 4 3 2 Y-l-C 22 15 1 4 2 3 Y-l-D 16 7 3 3 2 Y-l-E 8 5 2 4 1 Y-l-F 6 8 3 6 3 3 Y-l-G 12 8 3 • 2 2 2 Y-4-A 9 15 1 5 3 2 Y-l-B 16 14 2 2 3 Y-4-C 19 . . .. . 7 2 1 2 Y-4-D 10 7 3 2 3 Y-4-E 8 7 5 3 4 Y-4-F 16 19 2 2 2 1 Y-4-G 20 7 3 3 2 2 Z-l-A 8 3 3 4 Z-l-B 2 2 1 Z-l-C 6 6 1 1 1 1 Z-l-D 11 15 3 4 Z-l-E 16 7 4 2 Z-l-F 23 6 2 3 5 Z-l-G 10 9 3 1 3 3 3 11 2 358 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 Can Vacuum Lot Number Inches W-l-A 14 18 W-l-B 1 3 2 W-l-C 8 5 9 3 W-l-D 9 3 15 3 W-l-E 7 2 W-l-F 12 2- W-l-G 21 9 5 5 W-2-A 20 1 1 3 W-2-B 4 21 2 W-2-C 23 13 1 3 W-2-D 16 8 3 3 W-2-E 17 7 3 2 W-2-F 8 10 2 3 W-2-G 12 15 2 2 X-l-A 16 11 3 3 X-l-B 10 15 1 3 X-l-C X-l-D 19 7 8 4 1 2 X-l-E 5 7 1 4 X-l-F 12 5 6 7 X-l-G 8 15 2 3 X-3-A 16 9 2 4 X-3-B 11 8 6 5 X-3-C 10 9 2 5 X-3-D 14 13 3 7 X-3-E 17 13 5 2 15 5 Lot X-3-F Can Number 2 Vacuum Inches 1 X-3-G 10 11 1 5 Y-l-A 8 11 4 5 Y-l-B 16 15 2 2 Y-l-C 16 5 3 4 Y-l-D 6 17 1 3 Y-l-E 18 7 3 3 Y-l-F 17 11 5 4 Y-l-G 16 11 6 1 12 3 Y-4-A 17 9 Y-4-B 13 15 Y-4-C 14 15 Y-4-D 11 12 Y-4-E 8 5 3 3 5 1 5 5 5 2 1 Y-4-G 11 4 12 4 Z-l-A Z-l-B. Y-4-F 12 16 Z-l-C 14 Z-l-D Z-l-E Z-l-F Z-l-G 20 18 12 2 13 8 1 9 4 5 3 Can No. 10 X-l-A black inside Can No. 19 X-l-B very rusty inside, large air space and every evidence of severe corrosion. No perforation. APPENDIX H 359 INSPECTION DATA— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 9 Vacuum Inches 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 1 2 4 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 5 3 6 3 4 5 1 5 4 3 3 1 Lot X-3-E Can Number 10 Vacuum Inches 1 W-l-B 13 3 X-3-F 11 11 1 W-l-C 4 13 X-3-G 12 4 1 3 W-l-D 16 18 Y-l-A 5 7 3 19 9 4 W-l-E Y-l-B 10 13 3 18 n 4 W-l-F Y-l-C 14 7 2 22 10 4 W-l-G Y-l-D 8 19 3 11 5 3 W-2-A Y-l-E 20 9 3 1 W-2-B 13 9 Y-l-F 20 9 4 4 W-2-C 10 9 Y-l-G 10 10 3 1 W-2-D 12 6 Y-4-A 14 11 1 21 6 3 W-2-E Y-4-B 12 5 2 20 8 4 W-2-F Y-4-C 16 12 3 20 13 1 W-2-G Y-4-D 13 9 1 14 7 2 X-l-A Y-4-E 14 19 X-l-B 12 11 Y-4-F 20 1 4 1 X-l-C 12 13 Y-4-G 2 6 1 4 X-l-D 14 14 Z-l-A Z-l-B 10 3 X-l-E 15 15 16 15 X-l-F Z-l-C 16 8 X-l-G Z-l-D 22 14 7 X-3-A Z-l-E 23 X-3-B 10 15 Z-l-F 11 X-3-C 18 11 Z-l-G 10 X-3-D 12 10 12 5 11 360 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— STRING BEANS First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Can Lot Number W-l-A 45 46 W-l-B 45 46 W-l-C 45 46 W-l-D 47 48 W-l-E 44 45 W-l-F 46 47 W-l-G 23 24 W-2-A 21 22 W-2-B 45 46 W-2-C 45 46 W-2-D 47 48 W-2-E 23 24 W-2-F 46 47 W-2-G 45 46 X-l-A 21 24 X-l-B 44 45 X-l-C 45 46 X-l-D 15 23 X-l-E 23 24 X-l-F 21 24 X-l-G 45 46 X-3-A 45 46 X-3-B 23 24 X-3-C 21 24 X-3-D 41 42 Vacuum Inches 10 Lot X-3-E Can Number 46 Vacuum Inches 8 10 11 X-3-F 47 45 11 8 8 8 X-3-G 46 21 10 9 10 11 10 Y-l-A 24 25 8 9 11 9 Y-l-B 30 42 11 9 9 10 Y-l-C 43 22 4 10 9 9 Y-l-D 23 45 13 11 11 Y-l-E 46 42 11 11 10 10 Y-l-F 43 45 11 10 9 9 Y-l-G 46 46 12 11 6 10 9 Y-4-A 47 45 11 10 10 10 Y-4-B 46 23 9 10 10 8 Y-4-C 24 41 10 10 10 7 Y-4-D 43 41 11 10 11 Y-4-E 42 43 13 13 9 10 Y-4-F 44 43 12 11 10 9 Y-4-G 45 21 9 9 11 8 10 Z-l-A 23 45 11 10 8 10 Z-l'-B 46 46 9 9 9 11 Z-l-C 47 45 10 9 10 11 Z-l-D 46 32 10 6 10 Z-l-E 35 45 13 10 9 10 Z-l-F 46 45 10 11 10 9 Z-l-G 46 45 13 10 11 46 7 11 11 APPENDIX H 361 INSPECTION DATA— STRING BEANS— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 40 Vacuum Inches 7 10 9 10 8 12 7 9 6 6 12 9 9 9 9 9 5 10 10 7 9 9 5 9 7 9 7 9 10 11 10 10 10 9 9 9 10 8 6 9 10 10 11 8 10 10 6 6 10 8 Lot X-3-E Can Number 43 Vacuum Inches 9 W-l-B 42 43 X-3-F 44 43 12 10 W-l-C 47 21 X-3-G 47 22 8 9 W-l-D 22 18 Y-l-A 23 13 Jammed 23 41 5 W-l-E Y-l-B 15 21 10 43 43 44 21 8 W-l-F Y-l-C 22 41 9 9 W-l-G Y-l-D 42 42 9 22 36 11 W-2-A Y-l-E 43 39 9 10 W-2-B 45 43 Y-l-F 40 42 10 8 W-2-C 44 41 Y-l-G ..... 43 . 42 10 . 8 W-2-D 42 45 Y-4-A 45 42 4 46 21 7 W-2-E Y-4-B 44 21 7 48 45 8 W-2-F Y-4-C 22 1 10 48 43 44 45 9 W-2-G Y-4-D 20 43 7 11 X-l-A Y-4-E Y-4-F 44 41 42 ..... 41 12 12 X-l-B 46 41 11 12 X-l-C 42 43 Y-4-G 44 45 11 11 X-l-D 44 41 Z-l-A Z-l-B 46 43 44 44 10 X-l-E 42 45 14 13 46 43 11 X-l-F Z-l-C 45 41 7 45 43 10 X-l-G Z-l-D 42 21 9 44 47 12 X-3-A Z-l-E 22 . 19 12 11 X-3-B 48 47 Z-l-F 18 41 11 13 X-3-C . 48 46 Z-l-G 47 43 13 10 X-3-D 47 43 44 12 44 362 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— STRING BEANS— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Can Vacuum Can Vacuum Lot Number Inches Lot Number Inches W-l-A 33 10 9 X-l-A 39 10 34 42 11 35 10 43 11 37 10 44 9 W-l-B 37 6 11 X-l-B 37 10 39 38 9 40 5 39 8 44 7 40 12 W-l-C 17 10 10 X-l-C 37 10 18 38 7 20 8 39 7 24 9 40 7 W-l-D 17 11 10 X-l-D 37 8 19 38 9 20 10 39 10 22 9 , 40 7 W-l-E 37 9 7 X-l-E 37 9 38 38 8 39 9 39 8 40 6 42 8 W-l-F 38 9 10 X-l-F 39 10 39 40 8 40 10 42 7 41 6 44 10 W-l-G 16 10 10 X-l-G 38 10 17 39 11 18 7 41 10 19 9 42 7 W-2-A 25 11 12 X-3-A 40 8 26 41 10 37 11 42 7 38 10 43 8 W-2-B 37 10 7 X-3-B 42 10 38 43 10 39 7 45 9 42 7 46 10 W-2-C 37 7 9 X-3-C 41 9 38 42 9 39 10 43 7 44 10 45 9 W-2-D 37 10 10 X-3-D 34 10 41 38 7 42 9 39 9 43 10 40 11 W-2-E 41 10 7 X-3-E 38 10 43 39 12 45 6 41 9 46 9 42 10 W-2-F 37 9 10 X-3-F 38 13 41 39 10 42 10 41 6 43 10 44 11 W-2-G 37 3 10 X-3-G 7 11 38 18 7 41 7 19 10 47 8 20 7 APPENDIX H 363 INSPECTION DATA— STRING BEANS— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Can Vacuum Lot Number Inches Y-l-A 17 11 18 8 26 5 42 4 Y-l-B 37 3 38 10 39 13 41 10 Y-l-C 37 10 38 10 39 10 40 12 Y-l-D 37 7 38 11 39 4 41 6 Y-l-E 20 15 22 7 23 7 24 7 Y-l-F 37 8 38 10 39 7 41 9 Y-l-G 38 9 39 10 43 9 44 7 Y-4-A 38 8 39 10 41 10 47 10 Y-4-B 13 10 14 10 19 6 20 6 Y-4-C 16 14 21 13 22 10 24 10 Y-4-D 36 7 37 7 38 8 39 12 Can Vacuum Lot Number Inches Y-4-E 36 6 37 10 38 7 40 9 Y-4-F 19 10 38 10 39 10 40 11 Y-4-G .... . 13 7 17 11 20 5 24 12 Z-l-A 38 9 39 10 40 9 42 9 Z-l-B 39 10 40 10 41 11 42 7 Z-l-C 37 10 38 14 39 10 40 9 Z-l-D 17 11 18 9 19 11 24 13 Z-l-E 40 11 41 9 42 3 44 7 Z-l-F 38 12 39 3 43 11 44 11 Z-l-G 37 13 38 11 39 10 41 10 364 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— STRING BEANS— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 28 31 W-l-B 25 " 28 W-l-C 29 31 W-l-D 7 8 W-l-E 34 36 W-l-F 35 37 W-l-G 45 46 W-2-A 35 41 W-2-B 33 40 W-2-C 33 40 W-2-D 38 39 W-2-E 42 44 W-2-F 38 39 W-2-G 39 40 X-l-A 37 38 X-l-B 35 36 X-l-C 33 - 36 X-l-D 34 35 X-l-E 36 40 X-l-F 38 41 X-l-G 37 40 X-3-A 38 39 X-3-B '.. 37 41 X-3-C 37 44 X-3-D 35 36 Vacuum Inches 10 Lot X-3-E Can Number 37 Vacuum Inches 10 7 10 X-3-F 40 37 9 7 10 11 X-3-G 40 5 10 11 10 11 9 9 10 Y-l-A Y-l-B 8 31 40 33 8 8 1 12 10 Y-l-C 40 34 13 10 10 10 Y-l-D 35 34 10 13 11 Y-l-E ..... 40 38 6 10 10 10 Y-l-F 41 33 10 10 7 10 Y-l-G 40 37 10 10 11 10 11 Y-4-A 40 37 11 11 9 9 Y-4-B ..... 40 15 11 11 8. 11 Y-4-C 18 23 11 10 11 10 Y-4-D 42 33 9 6 10 Y-4-E 34 34 9 5 10 8 Y-4-F 35 36 10 9 11 9 Y-4-G 37 43 9 10 12 9 10 10 9 Z-l-A Z-l-B 47 34 37 20 10 8 13 6 1 8 Z-l-C 24 23 10 8 10 10 Z-l-D 24 14 11 11 10 Z-l-E 20 17 11 11 6 11 Z-l-F 22 37 10 10 7 10 Z-l-G 40 22 7 10 8 9 10 40 9 APPENDIX H 365 INSPECTION DATA— STRING BEANS— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number . 4 Vacuum Inches 7 8 7 8 7 8 6 6 7 7 9 5 7 7 9 8 7 6 7 8 9 9 8 10 7 10 9 6 9 11 10 10 IV 1 9 9 11 9 7 9 9 9 6 9 6 11 10 9 7 11 10 Lot X-3-E Can Number 3 Vacuum Inches 8 W-l-B 11 27 X-3-F 22 22 9 5 W-l-C 31 38 X-3-G 23 37 5 10 W-l-D 39 2 Y-l-A 38 24 8 24 22 9 W-l-E Y-l-B 29 26 8 32 21 14 W-l-F Y-l-C 30 31 8 22 13 10 W-l-G Y-l-D 32 27 8 14 23 11 W-2-A Y-l-E 28 16 11 W-2-B 24 21 Y-l-F 18 15 10 6 W-2-C 24 . 15 Y-l-G ..... 16 21 5 9 W-2-D 16 28 Y-4-A 22 23 9 40 15 16 12 10 W-2-E Y-4-B 33 9 9 10 W-2-F Y-4-C 10 12 8 21 , 35 10 W-2-G Y-4-D 17 23 10 36 15 9 X-l-A Y-4-E ..... 35 23 13 8 X-l-B 16 . 30 Y-4-F 24 25 8 8 X-l-C 34 15 Y-4-G 34 3 9 8 X-l-D 16 3 Z-l-A 41 25 11 36 . 25 9 X-l-E Z-l-B 26 37 6 26 31 10 X-l-F Z-l-C 38 27 11 32 33 12 X-l-G Z-l-D Z-l-E Z-l-F 30 15 43 2 16 13 10 X-3-A 34 15 11 11 7 X-3-B ..... 16 25 9 9 X-3-C 29 15 Z-l-G 14 11 10 7 X-3-D 16 9 13 22 366 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— STRING BEANS— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 26 30 W-l-B 2 9 W-l-C 43 44 W-l-D 43 44 W-l-E 28 33 W-l-F 17 18 W-l-G 10 11 W-2-A 15 16 W-2-B 22 23 W-2-C 13 14 W-2-D 14 20 W-2-E 13 18 W-2-F 6 16 W-2-G 18 22 X-l-A 25 35 X-l-B 3 20 X-l-C 29 35 X-l-D 17 19 X-l-E 19 22 X-l-F 23 33 X-l-G 11 13 X-3-A 13 14 X-3-B 26 30 X-3-C 25 26 X-3-D 10 11 Vacuum Can Vacuum Inches Lot Number Inches 10 X-3-E 7 9 9 11 7 10 X-3-F 29 9 7 33 6 10 X-3-G 45 5 3 48 9 6 7 Y-l-A 9 9 11 11 9 7 Y-l-B 24 6 8 28 9 11 Y-l-C 27 11 9 28 11 9 Y-l-D 33 7 35 4 9 Y-l-E 15 11 10 19 7 10 Y-l-F 14 9 7 18 9 7 Y-l-G 27 10 6 28 10 9 7 Y-4-A 21 8 7 22 9 11 Y-4-B 45 10 6 46 10 10 Y-4-C 9 11 10 11 9 11 Y-4-D 25 7 26 6 9 Y-4-E 15 8 9 20 8 10 Y-4-F 16 9 7 18 10 7 Y-4-G 38 6 8 44 7 9 12 Z-l-A 19 8 7 23 8 4 Z-l-B 15 8 8 23 6 9 Z-l-C 17 10 9 36 9 12 Z-l-D 41 11 46 6 11 Z-l-E 15 10 11 21 11 12 Z-l-F 15 9 8 16 9 8 Z-l-G 5 8 8 7 11 7 9 APPENDIX H • 367 INSPECTION DATA— CIDER First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot W-l-A Can Number 1 Vacuum Inches 10 W-l-B 2 1 9 12 W-l-C 2 1 15 14 W-l-D 2 1 10 13 W-l-E 2 1 16 14 W-l-F 2 1 12 13 W-l-G 2 1 12 11 W-2-A 2 1 14 14 W-2-B 2 1 16 15 W-2-C 2 1 14 15 W-2-D 2 1 15 13 W-2-E 2 1 13 15 W-2-F 2 1 12 12 W-2-G 2 1 11 11 X-l-A 2 1 11 12 X-l-B 2 1 14 14 X-l-C 2 1 13 13 X-l-D 2 1 12 12 X-l-E 2 1 14 14 X-l-F 2 1 11 11 X-l-G 2 1 12 12 X-3-A ..'... 2 1 10 16 X-3-B 2 1 12 15 X-3-C 2 1 18 15 X-3-D 2 1 15 14 2 13 Lot X-3-E Can Number 1 Vacuum Inches 15 X-3-F 2 1 13 12 X-3-G 2 1 13 13 Y-l-A 2 1 14 14 Y-l-B 2 1 15 13 Y-l-C 2 1 15 13 Y-l-D 2 ..... 1 15 13 Y-l-E 2 1 13 9 Y-l-F 2 1 11 13 Y-l-G 2 . . . . . 1 12 16 Y-4-A 2 1 15 13 Y-4-B 2 1 13 15 Y-4-C 2 1 14 14 Y-4-D 2 1 16 13 Y-4-E 2 1 13 14 Y-4-F 2 1 14 13 Y-4-G 2 1 14 16 Z-l-A 2 1 13 14 Z-l-B 2 1 15 . 16 Z-l-C 2 1 16 15 Z-l-D .... 2 1 12 8 Z-l-E 2 1 11 12 Z-l-F .... 2 1 15 15 Z-l-G .... 2 1 15 18 2 15 363 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— CIDER— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Two cans of each lot opened and inspected. No detailed observations recorded, as condition the same as before. Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 5 Vacuum Inches 10 10 9 14 10 12 13 14 15 16 15 15 14 16 15 15 15 13 13 13 16 15 14 16 12 14 10 11 6 5 13 14 13 11 13 12 13 14 11 12 12 13 14 15 12 14 15 16 16 14 Lot X-3-E Can Number 5 Vacuum Inches 15 W-l-B 6 5 X-3-F 6 5 14 11 W-l-C 6 5 X-3-G .... . 6 5 12 14 W-l-D 6 5 Y-l-A 6 5 14 6 5 15 W-l-E Y-l-B 6 5 13 6 5 15 W-l-F Y-l-C 6 5 12 6 5 12 W-l-G Y-l-D 6 5 15 6 5 12 W-2-A . . i . Y-l-E 6 5 13 12 W-2-B 6 5 Y-l-F 6 5 12 14 W-2-C 6 5 Y-l-G .. Y-4-A 6 5 6 5 14 17 W-2-D 6 5 15 6 .... 5 15 W-2-E Y-4-B 6 13 6 5 16 W-2-F Y-4-C 6 5 15 6 5 13 W-2-G Y-4-D 6 5 16 6 . . . : 5 14 X-l-A Y-4-E 6 5 15 16 X-l-B 6 5 Y-4-F 6 5 15 16 X-l-C 6 5 Y-4-G 6 5 17 15 X-l-D 6 5 Z-l-A Z-l-B 6 5 6 5 16 X-l-E 6 5 13 14 6 5 16 X-l-F Z-l-C 6 16 6 5 15 X-l-G Z-l-D 6 5 10 6 5 8 X-3-A Z-l-E 6 5 12 13 X-3-B 6 5 Z-l-F 6 5 14 16 X-3-C 6 5 Z-l-G 6 5 16 16 X-3-D 6 5 6 15 6 APPENDIX H 369 INSPECTION DATA— CIDER— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 7 Vacuum Inches 5 W-l-B .... 8 7 9 13 W-l-C 8 7 14 » 14 W-l-D 8 7 9 14 W-l-E 8 7 12 13 W-l-F 8 7 15 14 W-l-G .... 8 7 15 14 W-2-A .... 8 7 11 14 W-2-B 8 7 16 13 W-2-C W-2-D 8 7 8 7 15 14 14 13 W-2-E 8 7 15 14 W-2-F .... 8 7 12 12 W-2-G 8 7 11 12 X-l-A 8 7 9 13 X-l-B 8 7 7 12 X-l-C 8 7 10 10 X-l-D 8 ■ 7 10 12 X-l-E 8 7 12 12 X-l-F 8 7 11 10 X-l-G 8 7 10 13 X-3-A 8 ...... 7 11 14 X-3-B 8 7 12 15 X-3-C 8 7 16 14 X-3-D 8 7 14 14 X-3-E 8 7 12 14 8 12 Can Lot Number X-3-F 7 8 X-3-G 7 8 Y-l-A 7 8 Y-l-B 7 8 Y-l-C 7 8 Y-l-D 7 8 Y-l-E 7 8 Y-l-F 7 8 Y-l-G 7 8 Y-4-A 7 8 Y-4-B 7 8 Y-4-C 7 8 Y-4-D 7 8 Y-4-E 7 8 Y-4-F 7 8 Y-4-G 7 8 Z-l-A 7 8 Z-l-B 7 8 Z-l-C 7 8 Z-l-D 7 8 Z-l-E 7 8 Z-l-F 7 ' 8 Z-l-G 7 8 Following cans slack filled : W-l-A— No. 8. W-2-G— Nos. 7 & 8. Vacuum Inches 10 10 15 12 12 13 13 14 13 12 10 12 12 14 15 15 14 11 15 14 16 12 12 12 15 14 15 14 15 17 11 12 15 17 13 16 6 8 14 15 13 15 14 15 370 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— CIDER— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 9 10 W-l-B 9 10 W-l-C 9 10 W-l-D 9 10 W-l-E 9 10 W-l-F 9 10 W-l-G 9 10 W-2-A 9 10 W-2-B 9 10 W-2-C 9 10 W-2-D 9 10 W-2-E 9 10 W-2-F 9 10 W-2-G 9 10 X-l-A 9 10 X-l-B 9 10 X-l-C 9 10 X-l-D 9 10 X-l-E 9 10 X-l-F 9 10 X-l-G 9 10 X-3-A 9 10 X-3-B 9 10 X-3-C 9 10 X-3-D 9 10 Vacuum Inches 11 Lot X-3-E Can Number 9 Vacuum Inches 8 14 13 X-3-F 10 9 10 12 14 9 X-3-G 10 9 10 12 9 12 12, Y-l-A 10 9 13 9 11 6 Y-l-B 10 9 8 13 14 13 Y-l-C 10 9 12 9 15 11 Y-l-D 10 9 14 12 13 Y-l-E 10 9 12 9 12 14 Y-l-F 10 9 13 13 14 14 Y-l-G 10 9 10 16 11 12 13 Y-4-A 10 9 12 2 12 11 Y-4-B 10 9 13 13 12 11 Y-4-C 10 9 13 5 10 10 Y-4-D 10 9 12 8 12 Y-4-E 10 9 14 14 7 12 Y-4-F 10 9 9 14 12 11 Y-4-G 10 9 15 15 13 9 12 Z-l-A 10 9 16 12 12 12 Z-l-B 10 9 16 11 11 Z-l-C 10 9 14 12 13 11 Z-l-D 10 9 11 8 12 11 16 13 17 15 14 13 Z-l-E 10 9 8 7 Z-l-F 10 9 9 17 Z-l-G 10 9 13 14 10 APPENDIX H 371 INSPECTION DATA— CIDER— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 9 10 W-l-B 9 10 W-l-C 9 10 W-l-D 9 10 W-l-E 9 10 W-l-F 9 10 W-l-G 9 10 W-2-A 9 10 W-2-B 9 10 W-2-C 9 10 W-2-D 9 10 W-2-E . 9 10 W-2-F 9 10 W-2-G 9 10 X-l-A 9 10 X-l-B 9 10 X-l-C 9 10 X-l-D 9 10 X-l-E 9 10 X-l-F 9 10 X-l-G 9 10 X-3-A 9 10 X-3-B 9 10 X-3-C 9 10 X-3-D 9 10 Vacuum Inches Lot X-3-E Can Number 9 Vacuum Inches 7 6 10 X-3-F 10 9 14 10 11 10 X-3-G 10 9 10 11 6 11 11 Y-l-A 10 9 10 11 11 10 Y-l-B 10 9 10 14 11 Y-l-C 10 9 11 12 11 10 Y-l-D 10 9 10 12 Y-l-E 10 9 10 10 14 12 y-1-f .:... 10 9 10 8 13 13 Y-l-G . .... 10 9 9 8 12 11 12 Y-4-A 10 9 11 1 12 11 Y-4-B 10 9 1 11 12 10 Y-4-C . .... 10 9 12 10 11 Y-4-D 10 9 12 12 6 Y-4-E 10 9 12 10 9 11 Y-4-F 10 9 11 14 11 7 Y-l-G 10 9 10 13 10 9 10 10 8 Z-l-A Z-l-B 10 9 10 9 12 12 9 13 8 5 Z-l-C 10 9 11 8 9 8 Z-l-D 10 9 10 4 10 10 14 Z-l-E Z-X-F 10 9 10 9 4 6 7 10 10 15 Z-l-G 10 9 12 13 13 12 12 10 12 372 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— CLAM JUICE First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Can Lot Number W-l-A 1 2 W-l-B 1 2 W-l-C 1 2 W-l-D 1 2 W-l-E 1 2 W-l-F 1 2 W-l-G 1 2 W-2-A 1 2 W-2-B 1 2 W-2-C 1 2 VV-2-D 1 2 W-2-E 1 2 W-2-F 1 2 W-2-G 1 2 X-l-A 1 2 X-l-B 1 2 X-l-C 1 2 X-l-D 1 2 X-l-E 1 2 X-l-F 1 2 X-l-G 1 2 X-3-A 1 2 X-3-B 1 2 X-3-C 1 2 X-3-D 1 2 Vacuum Inches 17 Lot X-3-E Can Number 1 Vacuum Inches 17 16 18 X-3-F 2 1 17 16 5 4 X-3-G 2 1 16 18 18 17 15 Y-l-A 2 1 17 17 17 17 Y-l-B 2 1 18 18 16 17 Y-l-C 2 1 6 17 17 17 Y-l-D 2 1 18 14 5 Y-l-E 2 1 18 18 17 18 Y-l-F 2 1 18 19 17 18i Y-l-G 2 1 19 18 17 16 18 Y-4-A 2 1 17 18 18 18 Y-4-B 2 1 19 17 17 17 Y-4-C 2 1 18 18 17 17 Y-4-D 2 1 18 18 17 Y-4-E 2 1 18 18 16 18 Y-4-F 2 1 18 18 16 18 Y-4-G 2 1 18 18 18 16 18 Z-l-A 2 1 15 18 18 15 Z-l-B 2 1 17 18 6 18 Z-l-C 2 1 17 17 18 16 Z-l-D ..... 2 1 18 18 18 Z-l-E 2 1 18 18 5 18 Z-l-F 2 1 18 17 18 18 Z-l-G 2 ] 16 17 18 19 19 2 16 APPENDIX H 373 INSPECTION DATA— CLAM JUICE— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 3 4 W-l-B 3 4 W-l-C 3 4 W-l-D 3 4 W-l-E 3 4 W-l-F 3 4 W-l-G 3 4 W-2-A 3 4 W-2-B 3 4 W-2-C 3 4 W-2-D 3 4 W-2-E 3 4 W-2-F 3 4 W-2-G 3 4 X-l-A 3 4 X-l-B 3 4 X-l-C 3 4 X-l-D 3 4 X-l-E 3 4 X-l-F 3 4 X-l-G 3 4 X-3-A 3 4 X-3-B 3 4 X-3-C 3 4 X-3-D 3 4 "Vacuum Inches 17 Lot X-3-E Can Number 6 Vacuum Inches 16 16 3 X-3-F 4 3 17 16 17 18 X-3-G 4 3 16 7 18 17 17 Y-l-A 4 3 4 18 15 19 Y-l-B 4 3 18 18 15 16 Y-l-C 4 3 17 17 18 3 Y-l-D 4 3 17 18 17 Y-l-E 4 3 18 3 3 4 Y-l-F ..:.. 4 3 19 18 19 18 Y-l-G 4 3 19 19 17 17 7 Y-4-A 4 3 19 19 17 17 Y-4-B 4 3 19 1 17 18 Y-4-C 4 3 18 17 16 17 Y-4-D 4 3 4 17 17 Y-4-E 4 3 17 17 16 16 Y-4-F 4 3 19 17 17 4 Y-4-G 4 3 19 18 18 17 17 Z-l-A 4 3 15 19 16 19 Z-l-B 4 3 19 18 14 16 Z-l-C 4 3 3 16 18 18 Z-l-D 4 3 18 19 18 Z-l-E 4 3 18 18 17 17 Z-l-F 4 3 18 17 17 4 Z-l-G 4 3 19 17 17 18 18 4 18 374 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— CLAM JUICE— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Can Vacuum Can Vacuum Lot Number Inches Lot Number Inches W-l-A 5 17 15 X-l-A 5 16 6 6 18 7 17 7 8 15 8 10 W-l-B 5 17 17 X-l-B 5 17 6 6 18 7 4 7 18 8 17 8 17 W-l-C 5 17 19 X-l-C 5 18 6 6 18 7 2 7 5 8 4 8 18 W-l-D 5 16 6 X-l-D 5 17 6 6 18 7 6 7 19 8 17 8 17 W-l-E 5 16 17 X-l-E 5 17 6 6 13 7 5 7 17 8 17 8 3 W-l-F 5 16 16 X-l-F 5 18 6 6 13 7 6 7 8 17 8 15 W-l-G 5 17 17 X-l-G 5 6 13 6 14 7 7 7 16 8 9 8' 18 W-2-A 5 6 17 16 X-3-A 5 16 6 17 7 3 7 3 8 17 8 18 W-2-B 5 7 17 X-3-B 5 18 6 6 18 .' 7 12 7 18 8 16 8 17 W-2-C 5 17 16 X-3-C ' 5 12 6 6 17 7 17 7 19 8 17 8 8 W-2-D 5 17 18 X-3-D 5 17 6 6 18 7 2 7 18 8 18 8 18 W-2-E 5 18 16 X-3-E 5 18 6 6 18 7 17 7 18 8 18 8 18 W-2-F 5 12 17 X-3-F 5 16 6 6 16 7 18 7 n 8 18 8 W-2-G 5 18 18 X-3-G 5 17 6 6 16 7 18 7 5 8 18 8 13 APPENDIX H 375 INSPECTION DATA— CLAM JUICE— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Can Vacuum Can Vacuum Lot Number Inches Lot Number Inches Y-l-A 5 18 48 Y-4-E 5 17 6 6 17 7 3 7 17 8 18 8 17 Y-l-B 5 17 18 Y-4-F 5 17 6 6 17 7 19 IV 1 17 8 19 8 6 Y-l-C 5 18 17 Y-4-G 5 18 6 6 6 7 5 . 7 16 8 . . 8 17 Y-l-D 5 17 18 Z-l-A 5 6 17 7 18 6 17 8 2 7 18 Y-l-E 5 19 19 18 Z-l-B 8 5 18 6 7 17 6 17 8 18 7 17 Y-l-F 5 19 17 17 Z-l-C 8 5 17 6 7 16 6 16 8 18 7 17 Y-l-G 5 18 18 6 Z-l-D 8 5 16 6 7 18 6 18 8 18 7 8 17 17 Y-4-A 5 19 18 Z-l-E 5 18 6 6 16 7 19 7 5 8 19 8 6 Y-4-B 5 17 17 Z-l-F 5 18 6 6 17 7 17 7 17 8 15 8 17 Y-4-C 5 16 17 Z-l-G 5 17 6 6 18 7 17 7 18 8 17 8 17 Y-4-D 5 17 18 6 7 18 8 18 376 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— CLAM JUICE— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 11 Vacuum Inches 14 17 16 18 17 18 19 18 18 17 18 6 4 19 18 18 17 20 17 17 Q O 17 18 3 18 19 18 19 19 18 18 17 17 16 18 18 17 17 18 19 18 18 18 18 18 18 2 20 19 19 Lot X-3-E X-3-F Can Number 11 12 11 Vacuum Inches 17 W-l-B 12 11 18 17 W-l-C 12 11 X-3-G 12 11 18 16 W-l-D 12 11 Y-l-A 12 ..... 11 16 12 11 6 W-l-E Y-l-B 12 11 19 12 11 19 W-l-F Y-l-C 12 11 20 12 11 19 W-l-G Y-l-D 12 11 18 12 11 17 W-2-A Y-l-E 12 11 19 17 W-2-B 12 11 Y-l-F ..... 12 11 19 18 W-2-C 12 11 Y-l-G 12 11 18 19 W-2-D 12 11 Y-4-A 12 11 19 12 11 18 W-2-E Y-4-B 12 11 19 12 11 18 W-2-F Y-4-C 12 11 17 12 11 17 W-2-G Y-4-D 12 11 17 12 11 18 X-l-A Y-4-E 12 11 18 18 X-l-B 12 11 Y-4-F 12 11 17 19 X-l-C 12 11 Y-4-G 12 11 18 17 X-l-D 12 11 12 11 Z-l-A 12 11 18 20 X-l-E Z-l-B ., Z-l-C 12 11 12 11 18 X-l-F 12 n 18 18 12 11 17 X-l-G Z-l-D 12 11 17 12 11 18 X-3-A Z-l-E 12 11 18 18 X-3-B 12 11 Z-l-F 12 11 18 18 X-3-C 12 11 12 11 Z-l-G 12 11 19 17 X-3-D 12 18 12 APPENDIX H 377 INSPECTION DATA— CLAM JUICE— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 13 Vacuum Inches 14 15 18 15 16 13 13 12 14 16 15 15 14 15 16 17 16 16 5 16 17 17 18 16 17 17 17 7 17 17 16 15 15 17 18 18 18 16 18 18 18 18 16 16 18 18 16 8 18 18 Lot X-3-E Can Number 13 Vacuum Inches 17 W-l-B 14 13 X-3-F 14 ' 13 18 17 W-l-C 14 13 X-3-G 14 13 18 15 W-l-D 14 13 Y-l-A 14 13 17 14 13 19 W-l-E Y-l-B 14 13 19 14 13 19 W-l-F Y-l-C 14 13 19 14 13 6 W-l-G Y-l-D 14 13 16 14 13 17 W-2-A Y-l-E 14 13 19 2 W-2-B 14 13 Y-l-F 14 13 4 16 W-2-C .14 13 Y-l-G 14 13 19 18 W-2-D 14 13 Y-4-A Y-4-B 14 13 14 13 19 W-2-E 14 13 19 18 14 13 18 W-2-F Y-4-C 14 13 17 14 13 17 W-2-G Y-4-D 14 13 18 14 13 4 X-l-A Y-4-E ..... 14 13 18 17 X-l-B 14 13 Y-4-F 14 13 18 18 X-l-C 14 13 Y-4-G 14 13 18 19 X-l-D 14 13 Z-l-A 14 13 19 14 13 5 X-l-E Z-l-B 14 13 18 14 13 18 X-l-F Z-l-C 14 13 18 14 13 16 X-l-G Z-l-D 14 13 17 14 13 18 X-3-A Z-l-E 14 13 18 17 X-3-B 14 13 Z-l-F 14 13 18 7 X-3-C 14 13 Z-l-G 14 13 17 12 X-3-D 14 13 14 17 14 378 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— CLAM JUICE— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 14 Vacuum Inches 15 11 14 15 15 15 14 15 15 15 15 13 14 15 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 15 13 14 15 10 8 15 15 15 14 15 15 13 13 15 14 7 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 Lot X-3-E Can Number 14 Vacuum Inches 15 W-l-B 15 14 X-3-F 15 14 15 13 W-l-C 15 14 X-3-G 15 14 15 15 W-l-D 15 14 Y-l-A 15 14 14 15 14 15 W-l-E Y-l-B 15 14 15 15 14 16 W-l-F Y-l-C 15 14 16 15 14 15 W-l-G Y-l-D 15 14 15 15 14 16 W-2-A Y-l-E *15 14 15 15 W-2-B 15 14 Y-l-F 15 14 16 16 W-2-C .... 15 14 Y-l-G Y-4-A. Y-4-B 15 *14 15 *14 15 14 14 15 W-2-D .... 15 14 15 W-3-E .... 15 14 15 15 15 14 15 W-3-F .... Y-4-C . 15 *14 15 15 14 15 *14 13 W-2-G X-l-A Y-4-D Y-4-E Y-4-F 15 *14 15 . . . , *14 15 *14 14 14 13 15 X-l-B 15 14 16 15 X-l-C 15 1-1 Y-4-G 15 14 14 16 X-l-D - 15 14 Z-l-A *15 *14 16 15 14 15 X-l-E Z-l-B *15 *14 15 15 14 15 X-l-F 2-1-C *15 14 14 *15 14 14 X-l-G Z-l-D *15 14 14 15 14 15 X-3-A Z-l-E *15 14 14 15 X-3-B 15 14 Z-l-F *15 14 13 14 X-3-C 15 14 Z-l-G *15 *14 *15 14 14 X-3-D 15 . ... . 14 14 15 *Black traces appeared in the air space of these cans. APPENDIX H 379 INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN (Stored on Side) Preliminary Inspection, September 24, 1916 Lot W-l-A . Black Patches on Cans . . Medium Medium Medium Trace Lot X-l-A .. Black Patches on Cans . . None None None None W-l-B Bad Bad Trace Trace X-l-B Trace Trace None None W-l-C Trace Trace Trace Bad X-l-C None None None Trace W-l-D W-l-E W-l-F W-l-G W-2-A W-2-B None None None None None None None Bad Bad None None None None None None None None Trace Trace Trace None None None None Four cans each of X-l-D, X-l-E, X-l-F and X-l-G showed no black. X-3-A X-3-B X-3-C X-3-D None None None None None None Bad Trace None None None None Medium Medium Medium Trace Four cans each of X-3-E, and X-3-G showed no black. X-3-F Four cans each of Y-4-A, Y-4-B, Y-4-C, Y-4-D, Y-4-E, Y-4-F and Y-4-G showed no black. W-2-C Very bad None None None Four cans each of W-2-D, W-2-E, W-2-F and W-2-G showed no black. Four cans each of Z-l-A, Z-l-B, Z-l-C, Z-l-D, Z-l-E, Z-l-F and Z-l-G showed no black. All the tops were free from black except one can of Y-l-G. The body and bottom of this can were clean and the top was medium. 380 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Preliminary Inspection, September 24, 1916. Cans Stored Bottom End Up Two cans of each lot were inspected. No black was found in any case. Preliminary Inspection, October 22, 1915. Cans Stored Cap End Up Two cans each of forty-nine lots were inspected. A trace of black was found on the bodies with Y-l-B cans. The remainder showed no black. Preliminary Inspection, October 22, 1915. Cans Stored Cap End Down Two cans each of the forty-nine lots were inspected. Bad black was found only on the bottom of two cans, one each of X-3-A and X-l-E. The remainder were clean. APPENDIX H 381 INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Preliminary Inspection, October 22, 1915 Black Patches Lot on Cans W-l-A Medium Medium Medium Black Patches Lot on Cans X-l-A Trace None None W-l-B X-l-B Medium Trace Bad ■ Trace W-l-C .• None X-l-C Trace None None None None W-l-D X-l-D None None Medium None W-l-E X-l-E None Trace None None W-l-F X-l-F None None None None W-l-G X-l-G None None None None W-2-A X-3-A Bad None Trace None None W-2-B Trace None None W-2-C None None None X-3-B Trace Trace None X-3-C None None None W-2-D None None None X-3-D None None None W-2-E Trace None None X-3-E Trace Trace None W-2-F Trace None None X-3-F Trace None None W-2-G Trace None None Three cans each of X-3-G, Y-l-A, Y-l-B and Y-l-C showed no black. 382 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Preliminary Inspection, October 22, 1915 — Continued Black Patches Lot on Cans Y-l-D Trace Trace Trace Y-l-E Trace None None Y-l-F Trace None None Y-l-G None None None Y-4-A Trace Trace Trace Y-4-B None None None Lot Y-4-C Y-4-D Black Patches on Cans . . None None None Trace None None Three cans each, of Y-4-E, Y-4-F and Y-4-G showed no black. Three cans each of Z-l-A, Z-l-B, Z-l-C, Z-l-D and Z-l-E showed no black. Z-l-F Z-l-G Trace Trace None None None None All tops were free from black. One can of W-l-B showed bad black on the bottom. The other parts of the can were clean. One of each of the following showed a trace of black on the bottoms (the other parts of the cans were clean) : X-l-C, X-l-F, X-3-A, X-3-E, Y-4-A. The can W-2-E, which is not indicated free from black, showed a trace on both the body and the bottom. APPENDIX H 383 INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot W-l-A . Can Vacuum Black Patches W-l-B . W-l-C . W-l-D W-l-E W-l-F W-l-G W-2-A Number Inches . . 22 15 23 15 24 15 26 16 27 16 22 25 26 27 28 21 22 23 25 26 21 25 26 27 28 23 25 26 27 28 21 25 26 27 28 21 25 26 27 28 21 25 26 27 28 15 17 17 16 17 18 17 17 16' 17 18 18 10 18 18 18 17 18 18 18 18 17 17 18 18 18 17 17 18 18 18 17 18 18 18 on Cans Trace None None None None None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Can Vacuum Black Patches Lot Number Inches on Cans W-2-B . ...21 17 None 25 17 None 26 17 None 27 17 None 28 17 None W-2-C . ...22 17 None 25 20 None 26 17 None 27 18 None 28 17 None W-2-D . . . . 21 18 None 25 17 None 26 17 None 27 17 None 28 17 None W-2-E . ...21 17 None . 25 18 None 26 17 None 27 17 None 28 17 None W-2-F . ...21 17 None 23 17 None 25 17 None 26 17 None 27 17 None W-2-G . . . . 21 17 None 25 18 None 26 18 None 27 18 None 28 17 None X-l-A . ...21 18 None 22 17 None 25 17 None 27 17 None 28 18 None X-l-B . ...21 17 None 22 17 None 25 18 None 27 17 None 28 17 None 384 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Can Vacuum Black Patches Can Vacuum Black Patches Lot Number Inches on Cans X-l-C 13 18 None 23 18 None 21 5 None 22 17 None 25 17 None X-l-D . ...21 17 None 23 17 None 25 17 Medium 27 17 None 28 17 None X-l-E . ...21 17 None 22 17 None 25 17 None 27 17 None 28 17 None X-l-F . . . . 21 18 None 22 17 None 25 17 None 27 17 None 29 17 None X-l-G . . . . 22 17 None 23 17 None 25 17 None 27 17 None 29 16 None X-3-A . ...21 17 None 25 18 None 2C» 16 None 27 18 None 28 17 None X-3-B . ...22 17 None 25 18 None 26 18 None 27 17 None 28 17 None X-3-C . ...22 17 None 25 18 None 26 17 None 27 17 None 28 17 None X-3-D . ...19 17 None 22 17 None 23 16 None 25 17 None 28 17 None Lot Number Inches on Cans X-3-E . . ... 21 16 None 22 17 None 23 17 None 26 17 None 27 17 None X-3-F . . . . 21 18 None 25 16 None 26 17 None 28 17 None 29 17 None X-3-G . . . . 21 17 None 25 17 None 26 17 None 22 18 None 28 17 None Y-l-A . 22 None 25 None 26 None 27 None 28 None Y-l-B . ...2-1 None 25 None 26 None 27 None 28 None Y-l-C . ... 13 None 25 None 26 None 27 None 28 None Y-l-D . ...14 None 25 None 26 None 27 None 28 None Y-l-E . . . . 21 Medium 25 None 26 Medium 27 None 28 None Y-l-F . . . . 22 None 25 None 26 None 27 None 28 None I APPENDIX H 385 INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Can Vacuum Black Patches Lot Number Inches on Cans Y-l-G 24 . . None 25 . . None 26 . . None 27 . . None 28 . . None Lot Z-l-A Can Vacuum Black Patches Number Inches . . 22 16 25 17 26 17 27 17 28 16 on Cans None None None None None Y-4-A 23 25 26 27 28 16 16 16 14 16 None Trace Trace Trace None Z-l-B . 24 25 26 27 28 17 17 18 17 17 None None None None None Y-4-B 23 25 26 27 28 16 16 17 16 17 None None None None None Z-l-C 23 25 26 27 28 17 18 17 17 17 None None None None Trace Y-4-C . 22 24 25 26 2 17 16 16 17 16 None None None None None Z-l-D 25 26 27 28 16 17 17 17 17 None None None None None Y-4-D 22 23 26 27 28 16 17 17 16 17 None None None None None Z-l-E 23 25 26 27 28 16 17 16 17 17 None Trace None None None Y-4-E . 23 22 26 28 29 16 16 16 16 16 None Trace Trace Trace None Z-l-F . 24 25 26 27 2S 16 16 17 14 17 None None None None None . Y-4-F Y-4-G 24 25 26 27 24 25 26 27 28 16 17 17 17 17 16 17 17 16 18 None None None None None None None None Trace None Z-l-G 22 24 25 26 27 16 17 17 17 17 None None Trace None None All the tops and bottoms were free from black except can No. 25 X-l-D. The top of this can showed a medium amount of black. The other parts of this can were free from black. The following cans showed a medium amount of black in the contents : Y-l-E can 21, Y-4-E can 22, Z-l-D can 25. The following cans showed a trace of black in the contents : Z-l-A can 22, Z-l-D can 28. 386 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Can Vacuum Black Patches Can Vacuum Black Patches Lot Number Inches on Cans Lot Number Inches on Cans W-l-A . ... 2 15 Trace W-2-B . . . 17 16 None 3 14 Trace 18 16 None . 9 11 Trace 19 16 None 21 16 Trace 22 16 None 25 15 Trace 23 17 None W-l-B . .. 17 15 Trace W-2-C . .. 17 17 None 18 16 Trace 18 17 None 21 15 Trace 19 17 None 23 15 Trace 21 17 None 24 15 Trace 24 17 Trace W-l-C . .. 17 4 Trace W-2-D . ...17 17 None 18 16 Trace 18 16 None 19 15 Trace 19 17 None 24 16 Trace 22 17 None 27 16 Trace •23 17 None W-l-D . . . . 17 16 None W-2-E . ...17 3 None 18 16 None 18 17 Trace 19 15 Trace 19 16 Trace 22 17 Trace 22 15 None 23 16 Trace 23 18 None W-l-E . ...17 17 None W-2-F . . .. 17 17 None 18 17 None 18 17 None 19 17 None 19 16 None 21 18 None 20 17 None 22- 17 None 22 17 None W-l-F . .. 17 16 None W-2-G . ...17 17 Medium 18 16 None 18 17 Medium 19 17 Trace 19 17 None 23 17 None 22 16 None 24 10 None 23 16 None W-l-G . ...17 17 None X-l-A . ...17 17 None 18 17 Trace 18 17 None 19 17 Trace 19 17 Trace 22 18 Trace 23 14 None 23 17 Trace 24 17 Trace W-2-A . ...17 17 Medium X-l-B . ...17 14 Trace 18 17 Trace 18 17 None 19 16 None 19 17 Trace 22 17 Trace 20 18 None' 23 18 Medium 23 17 None APPENDIX H 387 INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Can Vacuum Black Patches Can Vacuum Black Patches Lot Number Inches on Cans Lot Number Inches on Cans X-l-C . . . . 17 6 Trace X-3-E . ... 17 12 Bad 18 17 Medium 18 17 Trace 19 Trace 19 17 None 20 14 Trace 20 17 Trace 24 16 None 24 17 Trace X-l-D . . . . 17 17 Trace X-3-F . . . . 17 17 None 18 14 None 18 17 None 19 None 19 13 None 22 18 Trace 22 15 Medium 24 17 None 23 10 Trace X-l-E . . . . 17 17 Medium X-3-G . . .. 12 3 None 18 18 Medium 16 16 Trace 19 4 Medium 17 16 None 23 10 None 18 6 Trace 24 17 None 23 16 None X-l-F . . .. 17 17 None Y-l-A . . .. 17 16 None 18 16 None 18 18 Trace 19 17 Medium 19 18 None 23 17 None 21 7 None 24 13 None 23 18 None X-l-G . ...17 17 Medium Y-l-B . . . . 16 17 None 18 17 None 17 16 None 20 17 Medium 18 17 Trace 21 17 Trace 19 18 None .24 17 Trace 21 17 None X-3-A . . . . 16 3 Bad Y-l-C . . . . 9 18 None 17 11 Trace 16 17 None 19 17 Trace 19 17 None 22 17 Trace 20 17 None 23 17 Trace 23 17 None X-3-B . ...17 17 None Y-l-D . ...18 18 None 18 17 None 19 14 None 19 17 Trace 21 18 None 21 17 Trace 22 17 Trace 23 17 None 23 . 18 None X-3-C ., ...17 17 None Y-l-E . ...18 17 Trace 18 17 Trace 19 17 None 19 17 Medium 22 17 None 21 15 Trace 23 17 None 23 16 None 24 18 None X-3-D .. , . . 17 17 None Y-l-F ' . . ...17 2 None 18 18 None 18 17 None 20 17 Trace 19 17 None 21 17 None 21 17 None 24 17 Trace 23 18 None 388 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Can Vacuum Black Patches Can Vacuum Black Patches Lot Number Inches on Cans Lot Number Inches on Cans Y-l-G . . . . 18 18 None Z-l-A . .. . 17 17 None 19 18 None 18 17 Medium 20 17 None 16 18 None 22 17 Trace 20 17 None 23 17 None 21 6 Trace Y-4-A . . . . 18 18 None Z-l-B . . . . 18 6 None 19 18 None 19 17 None 20 5 Trace 20 16 Trace 22 19 None 22 18 None 24 18 None 23 19 None Y-4-B . . . . 18 17 None Z-l-C . . . . 19 18 Trace 19 17 Trace 20 17 None 20 18 None 21 18 None 22 17 None 22 18 None 24 17 None 24 19 Trace Y-4-C . ... 9 17 None Z-l-D . .. . IS 18 Medium 10 17 None 19 17 None 15 17 None 21 18 None 18 17 None 22 17 None 19 18 Trace 24 18 None Y-4-D . . . . 18 17 Trace Z-l-E . . . . 18 17 Trace 19 16 Trace 19 18 None 20 17 None 20 17 Trace 21 17 None 22 18 None 25 17 Bad 24 18 None Y-4-E . . . . 18 17 None Z-l-F . ...19 17 Trace 19 17 None 20 17 None 20 17 None 21 17 None 21 16 Trace 22 17 None 24 17 None 23 17 None Y-4-F . ...18 17 Bad Z-l-G . . . . 17 17 None 19 17 None 18 17 Trace 20 17 Medium 19 17 None 21 17 None 20 18 Trace 22 17 Trace 23 13 None Y-4-G . . . . 15 17 18 20 21 17 18 18 17 18 None Medium Medium Trace None The tops of all cans were free from black. The bottoms of all cans were free from black except can No. 17, X-3-E, which was bad. The body of this can was medium. No black was found in the contents of any can. APPENDIX H 389 INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Lot VV-l-A . W-l-B W-l-C W-l-D W-l-E W-l-F . W-l-G . W-2-A Can Number .. 1 11 12 18 19 . . 12 13 14 19 20 . 6 10 13 14 20 . . 10 13 14 20 24 . 10 11 14 15 16 . 9 13 14 20 22 . 9 13 14 20 24 . 12 15 16 20 24 Vacuum Black Patches Can Vacuum Black Patches Inches on Cans Lot Number Inches on Cans 15 None W-2-B . ...10 18 None 16 None 14 18 None 16 None 15 17 None 17 None 20 18 None 14 None 24 17 None 14 None W-2-C . ... 9 17 None 17 None 10 18 None 16 None 13 17 None 16 None 14 17 None 16 None 20 18 None 16 None W-2-D . ...13 18 None 18 None 14 18 None 17 None 16 17 None 18 None 20 18 None 18 None 24 19 None 18 None W-2-E . ...11 18 None 18 None 14 18 None 3 None 15 18 None 17 None 20 18 None 17 None 24 18 None 17 None W-2-F . , .. . 9 18 None 18 None 10 18 None 17 None 13 17 None 18 None 14 18 None 18 None 15 17 None 18 None W-2-G . . . . 11 17 None 18 None 14 18 None 18 None 15 18 None 17 None 20 17 None 18 None 24 18 None 18 None X-l-A .. . . 9 17 None 18 None 10 3 None 18 None 13 18 None 18 None 14 18 None 17 None 20 18 None 18 None X-l-B .. . . 10 3 None 17 None 11 18 None 17 None 13 18 None 18 None 14 18 None 18 None 15 19 None 390 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916— Continued Can Vacuum Black Patches Lot Number Inches on Cans X-l-C . .. . 9 18 None 10 15 None 11 18 None 1-1 18 None 15 18 None X-l-D . . . . 10 17 None . 13 3 None 1-1 18 None 15 18 None 20 17 None X-l-E . ... 10 18 None 11 18 None 14 17 None 15 18 None 20 17 None X-l-F . .. 13 18 None 14 18 None 15 18 None 16 18 None 20 18 None X-l-G .. . . 9 19 None 10 18 None 13 17 None 14 17 None 19 18 None X-3-A .. .. 10 17 None 14 17 None 15 17 None 20 17 None 24 17 None X-3-B .. .. 10 17 None 13 18 None 14 17 None 20 17 None 24 17 None X-3-C .'. . . 10 17 None 14 17 None 15 17 None 20 17 None 24 16 None X-3-D . . . 11 17 None 12 17 None 14 18 None \ 15 17 None 16 18 None Lot X-3-E X-3-F X-3-G Y-l-A Y-l-B Y-l-C Y-l-D Y-l-E Y-l-F Can Number Inches "Vacuum Black Patches . 11 12 14 15 16 . 11 15 16 20 24 . 10 11 14 15 24 . 14 15 20 24 29 . 13 14 20 22 23 10 18 21 22 24 9 10 13 17 20 13 14 15 16 20 14 15 16 20 24 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 9 17 17 17 17 18 17 18 18 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 17 18 18 18 18 19 18 18 18 17 17 17 18 18 17 17 17 17 18 on Cans None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None APPENDIX H 391 INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Lot Y-l-G . Can Number ...11 Vacuum Inches 17 Black Patches on Cans None Lot Z-l-A . Can Number ...11 Vacuum Inches 3 Black Patches on Cans None 12 18 None 12 17 None 14 IS None 13 18 None 15 18 None 14 17 None 16 18 None 15 17 None Y-4-A . ...12 17 None Z-l-B . .. . 14 17 None 15 17 None 15 18 None 16 16 None 16 17 None 17 17 None 17 18 None 21 18 None 21 17 None Y-4-B . ...12 17 None Z-l-C . . . . 14 18 None 14 17 None 15 18 None 15 18 None 16 18 None 16 17 None 17 18 None 21 18 None 18 18 None Y-4-C . ...13 17 None Z-l-D . . . . 10 17 None 16 18 None 14 18 None 17 18 None 15 18 None 20 17 None 17 18 None 21 18 None 21 18 None Y-4-D . . . . 11 17 None Z-l-E . ...14 17 None 12 17 None 15 18 None 15 18 None 16 18 None 16 17 None 17 17 None 17 17 None 21 2 None Y-4-E . ...12 17 None Z-l-F . ...14 17 None 14 17 None 15 18 None 15 17 None 16 17 None 16 18 None 17- 18 None 17 17 None 18 17 None Y-4-F . ...13 16 None Z-l-G . ...13 18 None 14 17 None 14 5 None 15 17 None 15 18 None 16 17 None 16 17 None 17 17 None 21 9 None Y-4-G . ...11 12 13 14 16 18 17 18 3 17 None None None None None I No black was observed in the contents. The tops and bottoms were all free from black. 392 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 Lot W-l-A . W-l-B . W-l-C W-l-D W-l-E . W-l-F W-l-G W-2-A Can Number . . 3 7 10 16 20 . . 6 9 10 11 10 5 11 12 15 16 . . 9 11 12 15 16 6 9 12 13 7 11 12 15 16 10 11 12 15 16 9 10 n 13 14 Vacuum Black Patches Can Vacuum Black Patcl Inches on Cans Lot Number Inches on Cans 13 None W-2-B . ... 9 17 None 12 None 11 17 None 15 None 12 16 None 10 None 13 16 None 15 None 16 16 None 15 None W-2-C . .. 6 16 None 13 None 11 16 None 14 None 12 16 None 15 None 15 16 None 15 None 16 15 None 3 None W-2-D . .. . 9 16 None 4 None 10 15 None 17 None 11 16 None 15 Trace 12 17 None 16 None 15 16 None 10 None W-2-E . . . . 6 16 None 17 None 9 17 None 16 None 10 16 None 16 None 12 16 None 15 Trace 16 17 None 18 None W-2-F . .. 1 13 None 16 None 5 16 None 17 None 11 17 None 17 None 12 16 None 18 None 16 16 None 16 None W-2-G . . . . 9 17 None 17 None 10 16 None 16 None 12 17 None 16 None 13 16 None 17 None 16 16 None 17 None X-l-A . .. 9 16 None 17 None 11 16 None 17 None 12 17 None 16 None 15 16 None 17 None 16 17 None 16 None X-l-B . .. 2 17 None 5 None 6 16 None 16 None 9 17 None 16 None 12 17 None 16 None 16 17 None APPENDIX H 393 INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Lot X-l-C Can Vacuum Black Patches Number Inches , . 3 5 6 16 7 16 12 16 16 3 on Cans None None None None None Lot X-3-E Can Number . . 3 7 9 10 13 Vacuum Black Patches Inches on Cans 17 15 16 16 None None None None None X-l-D 6 9 11 12 16 17 5 16 17 2 None None None None None X-3-F 9 10 12 13 14 .16 15 15 15 16 None None None None None X-l-E 9 12 13 16 17 16 17 17 17 None None None None None X-3-G 3 7 9 13 19 16 16 17 17 15 None None None None None X-l-F 6 9 10 11 12 16 17 17 17 17 None None None None None Y-l-A 10 11 13 16 16 16 15 16 15 None None None None None X-l-G 6 11 12 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 None None None None None Y-l-B 9 10 11 12 16 15 16 17 17 17 None None None None None X-3-A 9 11 12 13 16 16 16 16 17 15 None None None None None Y-l-C 9 11 12 16 17 16 16 15 16 16 None None None None None X-3-B 9 11 12 15 16 16 15 16 15 16 None None None None None Y-l-D 6 11 12 15 16 15 17 17 17 17 None None None None None X-3-C 9 11 12 13 16 2 17 16 16 15 None None None None None Y-l-E 6 9 10 11 12 16 16 16 16 16 None None None None None X-3-D 9 10 13 15 16 16 16 16 None None None None None Y-l-F 7 10 11 12 13 16 16 15 15 16 None None None None None 394 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Lot Y-l-G . Can "Vacuum Black Patches Number Inches on Cans . . 8 15 None 10 17 None 13 16 None 17 17 None 21 16 None Lot Z-l-A Can Vacuum Black Patches Number Inches on Cans . . 3 16 None 7 15 None 8 15 None 9 16 None 10 16 None Y-4-A 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 14 15 17 None None None None None Z-l-B . 9 10 11 12 13 16 16 12 16 16 None None None None None Y-4-B-. 3 7 10 11 17 16 16 16 16 None None None None None Z-l-C 9 10 11 12 13 17 16 16 4 17 None None None None None Y-4-C 3 5 7 9 13 16 16 16 15 15 None None None None None Z-l-D 9 11 12 13 16 17 16 15 15 15 None None None None None Y-4-D . 7 9 10 13 14 16 15 16 15 15 None None None None None Z-l-E 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 16 15 None None None None None Y-4-E 7 9 10 11 13 16 16 16 16 16 None None None None None Z-l-F . 7 S 11 12 13 16 15 15 3 16 None None None None None Y-4-F 9 10 11 12 16 15 15 16 16 None None None None None Z-l-G 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 11 16 None None None None None Y-4-G 3 7 8 9 10 16 15 15 16 16 None None None None None All can bodies, tops and bottoms were free from black except W-l-C can No. 15 and W-l-D can No. 16, which showed traces of black on the tops. No black was observed in the contents. APPENDIX H 395 INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 Can Vacuum Black Patches Lot Number Inches on Cans W-l-A 5 11 None 8 14 None 13 15 None 15 13 None 17 16 None Can Vacuum Black Patches Lot Number Inches on Cans W-2-B .... 2 17 None 3 16 None 5 16 None 6 15 None 8 16 None W-l-B . 16 15 15 15 14 None Trace None Trace None W-2-C 16 16 16 16 16 None None None None None W-l-C 16 16 15 16 14 None None None None None W-2-D 15 16 16 16 17 None None None None None W-l-D 16 15 16 16 15 None None Trace None None W-2-E . . . 17 16 16 16 16 None None None Trace None W-l-E . 16 3 16 16 17 None None None None None W-2-F 16 17 17 16 16 None None None None. None W-l-F 16 16 20 16 16 None None None None None W-2-G 16 16 16 16 16 None None None None None W-l-G 16 16 15 17 17 None None None None None X-l-A .. 17 17 17 17 18 None None None None None W-2-A . 15 17 17 16 17 None None None None None X-l-B .. 17 17 17 17 17 None None None None None 396 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Lot X-l-C Can Number .. 1 2 4 5 Vacuum Black Patches Inches 17 16 17 17 7 on Cans None None None None None Lot X-3-E . Can Number .. 1 2 4 Vacuum Black Patches on Cans None None None None Inches 16 16 16 16 16 None X-l-D 17 17 17 17 17 None None None None None X-3-F 17 16 16 16 16 None None None None None X-l-E 17 17 16 17 17 None None None None None X-3-G . 16 16 16 16 16 None None None None None X-l-F 17 16 17 16 16 None None None None None Y-l-A 1 6 7 8 12 18 17 17 17 16 None None None None None X-l-G 15 17 17 16 16 Medium None None None None Y-l-B . 17 17 17 17 18 None None None None None X-3-A 16 17 17 16 17 None None None None None Y-l-C 3 4 7 8 14 17 17 16 17 16 None None None None None X-3-B 16 15 16 15 17 None None None None None Y-l-D 16 17 17 17 17 None None None None None X-3-C 8 16 16 17 16 None None None None None Y-l-E . 16 17 16 17 16 None None None None None X-3-D 16 16 17 17 16 None None None None None Y-l-F . 17 16 16 15 16 None None None None None APPENDIX H 397 INSPECTION DATA— ILLINOIS CORN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Lot Y-l-G Y-4-A Y-4-B Y-4-C Y-4-D . Y-4-E Y-4-F . Can Number . . 3 4 6 7 4 5 6 8 13 1 11 12 1 4 5 6 Vacuum Black Patches Inches 15 15 16 16 15 16 15 17 18 16 17 16 16 15 16 16 15 16 17 16 16 16 17 16 15 15 15 15 16 15 15 15 15 on Cans None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Lot Z-l-A . Can Number ... 1 Vacuum Inches 15 Black Patches on Cans None 2 16 None 4 15 None 5 15 None 6 15 None Z-l-B . ... 1 17 None 2 15 None 4 4 None 5 17 None 8 17 None Z-l-C . ... 3 7 None 4 16 None 6 17 None 7 16 None 8 16 None Z-l-D . .. . 1 17 None ■2 17 None 5 17 None 6 7 None 8 17 None Z-l-E . .. . 1 17 None 2 16 None 4 15 None 6 16 None 7 16 None Z-l-F . . . . 1 17 None 2 15 None 5 16 None 6 16 None 9 16 None Z-l-G . None 2 15 None 5 16 None 6 15 None 7 4 None Y-4-G 15 15 16 16 16 None None None None None All tops and bottoms were free from black. No black was observed in the contents. 398 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA- -INDIANA CORN First Preliminary Inspection, September 22, 1915 . T71 n r*lr "D " + « i-» ^ *-< tin Lot r Cans JT> I i a. c it i ii Contents Y-4-B 6 14 Medium Medium None None No detailed 7 15 Bad Bad None None observations 8 14 Bad Bad None None recorded. 9 16 Bad Bad None None Discoloration 10 Trace Trace None None quite general. Y-4-C 6 15 Bad Bad None None 7 16 Trace Trace None None 8 14 Bad Bad None None 9 16 Bad Bad None None 10 17 Bad Bad None None Y-4-D 6 14 Bad Bad None None 7 16 Bad Bad None None 8 14 Bad Bad None None 9 16 Bad Bad None None 10 16 Bad Bad None None Y-4-E 6 16 Bad Bad None None 7 16 Trace Trace None None 8 16 Medium Medium None None 9 16 Medium Medium None None 10 14 Bad Bad None None Y-4-F 6 16 Medium Medium None None 7 16 Bad Medium None Bad 8 16 Medium Medium None None 9 17 Medium Medium None None 10 16 Medium Medium None None Y-4-G 6 16 Bad Bad None None 7 16 Bad Bad None None 8 16 Medium Medium None None 1 9 16 Medium Medium None None 10 16 Bad Bad None None Z-l-A 6 15 Bad Bad None None 7 15 Bad Bad None None 8 15 Trace Trace None None 9 15 Bad Bad None None 10 17 Bad Bad None None Z-l-B 6 15 Trace Trace None None 7 17 Trace Trace None None 8 17 Bad Bad None None 9 17 Medium Medium None None 10 16 Bad Bad None None Z-l-C 6 17 Bad Bad None None 7 15 Bad Bad None None 8 14 Medium Medium None None 9 15 Bad Bad None None 10 16 Medium Medium None None APPENDIX H 415 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Lot Z-l-D Can Vacuum No. Inches Z-l-E 6 7 8 9 10 6 7 8 9 10 17 17 16 16 16 15 16 16 16 15 Cans Bad Medium Medium Medium Bad Medium Medium Bad Medium Medium — Black Patches on • Bodies Tops Bad None Medium None Medium None Medium None Bad None Medium None Medium None Bad None Medium None Medium .None Bottoms Bad None None None None None None None None None Black in Contents No detailed observations recorded. Discoloration quite general. Z-l-F. 6 7 8 9 10 15 16 16 14 14 Medium Bad Medium Bad Medium Medium Bad Medium Bad Medium None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-G 6 7 8 9 10 14 13 16 15 13 Medium Bad Trace Medium Medium Medium Bad Trace Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None 416 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Lot W-l-A. Can Vacuum No. Inches 11 12 13 14 15 17 14 16 16 3 , Black Patches on , Black in Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms Contents Trace Trace None None Medium Medium Medium None None Medium Medium Medium None None None Bad Bad None None None Bad Bad None None None W-l-B. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 13 17 17 Medium Bad Medium Medium Medium Medium Bad Medium Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None Trace None None None None W-l-C. 11 12 13 14 15 17 17 16 16 17 Trace Medium Trace Medium Trace Trace Medium Trace Medium Trace None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None Medium None W-l-D . 11 12 13 14 15 15 18 18 16 18 Bad Medium •Medium Bad Medium Bad Medium Medium Bad Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None Medium None None W-l-E. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 16 17 Bad Bad Medium Bad Medium Bad Bad Medium Bad Medium None None None None None Bad None None None None None Trace None None None W-l-F. 11 12 13 14 15 17 17 17 17 15 Trace Medium Bad Trace Medium Trace Medium Bad Trace Medium None None None None None None None Bad None None Medium None None None None W-l-G. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 17 17 Medium Trace Bad Medium Medium Medium Trace Bad Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None W-2-A. 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 17 17 16 Bad Medium Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None W-2-B. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 18 Bad Medium Trace Medium Bad Bad Medium None Medium Bad None None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None APPENDIX H 417 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Can + n ^ ac Lot No. V ft C U U 1T1 Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms -t>lacl^ in Contents W-2-C 11 17 Bad Bad None None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None Trace 13 16 Medium edium None None None 14 17 Trace Trace None None Trace 15 17 Bad Bad Trace Bad None W-2-D . . .. 11 18 Bad Bad None None None 12 18 Medium edium None None Trace 13 17 Medium Medium None None None 14 18 Medium Medium .None None None 15 18 Trace Trace None None None W-2-E 11 16 Medium Medium None None Bad 12 17 Bad Bad Medium None None 13 17 Trace Trace None None None 14 17 Bad Bad None Bad None 15 17 Bad Bad None None Trace W-2-F 11 17 Medium Medium None None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None None 13 17 Bad Bad None None None 14 15 Bad Bad None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None W-2-G... . . 11 21 Trace Trace None None None 12 16 Bad Bad None None None 13 17 Medium Medium None None None 14 16 Medium Medium None None None 15 18 Trace Trace None None None X-l-A 11 16 Bad Bad None None None 12 16 Medium Medium None None Trace 13 15 Bad Bad None None None 14 17 Trace Trace None None Trace 15 16 Medium Medium None None None X-l-B 11 16 Medium Medium None None None 12 16 Medium Medium None None None 13 16 Medium Medium None None None 14 16 Bad Bad None None None 15 16 Bad Bad None None None X-l-C 11 16 Medium Medium None None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None None 13 17 Medium Medium None None None 14 15 Bad Bad None None None 15 17 Medium Medium None None None X-l-D 11 16 Medium Medium * None None Medium 12 17 Bad Bad None None None 13 17 Medium Medium None None None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 Trace Trace None None None 418 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Can V^RCiiuni !Blctck PelI" / "*^~* ^^ *"»■*"» Lot No. Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms -hsiaciv in Contents X-l-E 11 18 None None None None None 12 16 Medium Medium None None None 13 17 Medium Medium None None Trace 14 15 Bad Bad Trace None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None X-l-F 11 17 Medium Medium None None None 12 15 Medium Medium None None None 13 17 Trace Trace None None None 14 20 None None None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None X-l-G 11 17 Medium Medium None None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None None 13 17 Bad Bad None None None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 16 Bad Bad None None None X-3-A 11 16 Trace Trace None None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None Trace 13 20 Trace Trace None None None 14 16 Medium Medium None None None 15 17 Bad Bad None None None X-3-B 11 18 Trace Trace None None None 12 17 Trace Trace None None Trace 13 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 14 18 Bad Bad None None None 15 17 Medium Medium None None None X-3-C 11 16 Bad Bad None None None 12 16 Medium Medium None None None 13 19 Trace Trace None None None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 17 Bad Bad None None Trace X-3-D 11 17 Bad Bad None None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None None 13 17 Medium Medium None None None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 17 Bad Bad None None None X-3-E 11 18 Medium Medium None None None 12 17 Bad Bad None None None 13 17 Medium Medium None None None 14 16 Trace Trace None None None 15 18 Medium Medium None None None X-3-F 11 18 Medium Medium None None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None Trace 13 16 Medium Medium None None None 14 18 Medium Medium None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None APPENDIX H 419 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Can BlcLCk p^tnhoc r\ti . Lot No. V aCUUlYl Inches t Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms -fc>iacK in Contents X-3-G 11 18 Medium Medium None None None 12 17 Trace Trace None None None 13 17 Trace Trace None None .None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 17 Medium Medium None None None Y-l-A 11 16 Medium Medium None None None 12 16 Medium Medium None None None 13 16 Medium Medium None None None 14 16 Medium Medium None None Trace 15 17 Medium Medium None None None Y-l-B 11 16 Medium Medium None None None 12 15 Medium Medium None None None 13 17 Medium Medium None None None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 1 14 Medium Medium None None None Y-l-C 11 16 Medium Medium None None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None None 13 16 Medium Medium None None None 14 16 Bad Bad None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None Y-l-D 11 15 Medium Medium None None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None None 13 17 Trace Trace None None None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 Bad Bad None None None Y-l-E 11 16 Trace Trace None None None 12 16 Medium Medium None None None 13 16 Bad Bad None None None 14 16 Medium Medium None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None Y-l-F 11 15 Medium Medium None None Trace 12 15 Medium Medium None None None 13 16 Medium Medium None None None 14 16 Bad Bad None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None Y-l-G . . . .. 11 16 Trace Trace None None None 12 16 Medium Medium None None None 13 15 Medium Medium None None None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None None Y-4-A 11 16 Bad Bad " None None Trace 12 17 Medium Medium None None None 13 18 Bad Bad None None None 14 16 Trace Trace None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None None 420 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Can No. "Rltinlr Potnlifle- r\ri . Lot v Etcuiim Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms JjiacK in Contents Y-4-B... . . 11 16 Medium Medium None None None 12 14 Bad Bad None None None 13 15 Bad Bad None None None 14 14 Medium Trace Medium None None 15 15 Bad Bad None None None Y-4-C 11 15 Medium Medium None None None 12 17 Trace Trace None None None 13 18 Medium Medium None None Trace 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None None Y-4-D 11 15 Medium Medium None None None 12 16 Medium Medium None None None 13 16 Bad Bad None None None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 16 Bad Bad None None None Y-4-E 11 16 Medium Medium None None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None None 13 15 Bad Bad None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None Y-4-F 11 17 Medium Medium None None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None None 13 17 Bad Bad None None None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None None Y-4-G . . .. 11 16 Medium Medium None None Trace 12 17 Trace Trace None None None 13 18 Trace Trace None None None 14 17 Bad Bad None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None None Z-l-A 11 16 Bad Bad None None None 12 15 Medium Medium None None None 13 17 Bad Bad None None None 14 16 Trace Trace None None Trace 15 15 Trace Trace None None None Z-l-B 11 14 Trace Trace None None None 12 17 Trace Trace None None None 13 17 Trace Trace None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None Z-l-C 11 16 Medium Medium None None None 12 15 Medium Medium None None Trace 13 17 Medium Medium None None None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 17 Medium Medium None None None APPENDIX H 421 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued — . . T^li^lr Po^-nVinf *-\ti Lot No. V Rcuum Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms -t>l£LClc in Contents Z-l-D . . ..„ 11 16 Trace Trace None None None 12 17 Trace Trace None None None 13 18 Medium Medium None None None 14 18 Bad Bad None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None Z-l-E 11 15 Medium Medium None None None 12 15 Medium Medium None None None 13 15 None None None None None 14 15 Trace Trace ■ None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None None Z-l-F 11 16 Medium Medium None None None 12 15 Medium Medium None None None 13 16 Medium Medium None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None None None 15 17 Trace Trace None None None Z-l-G 11 14 Trace Trace None None None 12 15 None None None None None 13 14 Bad Bad None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None None 422 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 Can No. Vacuum Inches "Rl a r>lr PntoViac rtv» . Lot r Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms -fc>iacli in Contents W-l-A. . . .. 11 15 Very bad Very bad None None None 12 16 Very bad Very bad None None None 13 14 Bad Bad None None None 14 16 Bad Bad None None None 15 16 None None None None Bad W-l-B... 11 16 Very bad Very bad None None None 12 16 Bad Bad None None None 13 12 Medium Medium None None None 14 16 Very bad Very bad None Bad None 15 15 Very bad Very bad None None Medium W-l-C... 11 15 Very bad Very bad None None Medium 12 16 Medium Medium None None Medium 13 15 Bad Bad None None None 14 16 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 Bad Bad None None None W-l-D . . . . 11 15 Bad Bad None Medium None 12 18 Bad Bad None Medium None 13 17 Bad Bad None Medium None 14 15 Bad Bad None None None 15 15 Bad Medium None Bad None W-l-E 11 16 Bad Bad None None None 12 14 Bad Bad None Medium None 13 13 Medium Medium None Medium None 14 17 Medium Medium None Medium None 15* 16 Trace Trace None None None W-l-F 11 15 Bad None None Bad None 12 17 Medium Medium None None None 13 14 Medium Medium None None None 14 17 Medium Medium None None Medium 15 17 Very bad Very bad None None Medium W-l-G. . . 11 16 Bad Bad None None None 12 18 Medium Medium None None None 13 16 Bad Bad None Bad Medium 14 17 Bad Bad None None None 15 17 Bad Bad None None Bad W-2-A 11 15 Bad Bad None None None 12 15 Bad Bad None None None 13 16 Very bad Very bad None Bad None 14 16 Very bad Very bad None None Bad 15 15 Very bad Very bad None None None W-2-B 11 16 Bad Bad None Bad None 12 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 13 17 Bad Bad None None Bad 14 2 Bad Bad None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None Medium Very bad APPENDIX H 423 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Can 331o.clv r* tX + n ^ '"*" "■*" Lot No. V ftcuum Inches f Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms -DiciCK in Contents W-2-C n 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 12 17 Bad Bad None None None 13 16 Medium Medium None Medium Medium 14 15 Medium Medium None None None 15 1 Medium Medium None Medium None W-2-D . . .. 11 15 Bad Bad None None None 12 16 Bad Bad None None Medium 13 16 Medium Medium None None None 14 15 Bad Bad None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None Medium None W-2-E 11 14 Medium Medium None Medium None 12 14 Medium Medium None None Bad 13 15 Medium Medium None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None None None 15 13 Medium Medium None None None W-2-F 11 15 Medium Medium None None None 12 15 Very bad Very bad None None None 13 15 Bad Bad None None Medium 14 15 Very bad Very bad None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None W-2-G 11 14 Very bad Bad None Very bad None 12 16 Very bad Bad None Very bad Very bad 13 13 Medium Medium None None None 14 4 Bad Bad None None None 15 17 Very bad Medium None Very bad None X-l-A 11 16 Bad Bad None None Medium 12 11 Very bad Very bad None None None 13 14 Bad Bad None None None 14 16 Bad Bad None None Bad 15 16 Bad Bad None None Bad X-l-B 11 16 Bad Bad None None None 12 14 None None None None None 13 16 Bad Bad None None None 14 18 Bad Bad None None None 15 15 Bad Bad None None None X-l-C 11 16 Very bad Very bad None None None 12 16 Bad Bad None Medium None 13 16 Bad Bad None Medium None 14 15 Bad Bad None Medium None 15 17 Medium Medium None None None X-l-D 11 14 Bad Bad None None None 12 17 Bad Bad None None None 13 17 Medium Medium None None Medium 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 17 Bad Bad None Medium Medium 424 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Can IBldClC P CL 1" n ^"* n " nin . Lot No. Inches f Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms .fc> l a c k i n Contents X-l-E 11 16 Bad Bad None Bad None 12 17 Bad Bad None Medium None 13 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 14 14 Medium Medium None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None X-l-F 11 16 Bad Bad None None None 12 14 Medium Medium None None Very bad 13 16 Bad Bad None None Very bad 14 15 Medium Medium None None Very bad 15 16 Bad Bad None None None X-l-G 11 17 Bad Bad Bad None None 12 17 Medium Medium None None None 13 18 Bad Medium Bad None Very bad 14 18 None None None None None 15 15 Trace Trace None None None X-3-A 11 17 Bad Bad None None Very bad 12 16 Trace Trace None None None 13 18 Bad Trace Bad None Bad 14 14 Trace Trace None None None 15 15 Trace Trace None None None X-3-B 11 3 Very bad Very bad None None None 12 16 Bad Bad Medium None None 13 16 Bad Bad Medium None None 14 14 Medium Medium None None None 15 7 Bad Bad None None None X-3-C 11 17 Bad Bad None None None 12 16 Bad Bad None None None 13 16 Bad Bad Medium None None 14 15 Very bad Very bad None None None 15 17 Bad Bad None None . Medium X-3-D 11 16 Bad Bad None None None 12 16 Bad Bad None None None 13 14 Medium Medium None None • None 14 17 Medium Medium None None None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None X-3-E 11 15 Bad Bad None None None 12 17 Bad Bad None None None 13 14 Bad Bad None None None 14 14 Bad Bad None None None 15 15 Bad Bad None None None X-3-F 11 16 Bad Bad None None None 12 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 13 18 Bad Medium None Bad None 14 14 Very bad Very bad None Bad None 15 15 Bad Bad None None None APPENDIX H 425 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Lot X-3-G. Can "Vacuum No. Inches Black Patches on Y-l-A. 11 12 13 14 15 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 17 16 15 15 16 15 15 Bottoms Cans Bodies Tops Bad Bad None None Medium Medium None None Medium Medium None None Medium Medium None None Bad Medium None Bad Bad Bad None None A ery bad Very bad None None Bad Bad None None Bad Bad None None Bad Bad None None Black in Contents None None None None None None None Bad None Trace Y-l-B 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 15 16 Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad None Bad None None Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None Trace Y-l-C 11 12 13 14 15 14 14 17 16 15 Bad Bad Bad Trace Bad Bad Medium Bad Trace Bad None Bad None None None None Medium None None None Medium None None None None Y-l-D 11 12 13 14 15 3 15 15 14 16 Bad Bad Medium Bad Medium Bad Bad Medium Bad Medium None None None None None None None None None None None Bad None None None Y-l-E. 11 12 13 14 15 15 16 15 16 15 Bad Bad Bad Medium Medium Bad Trace Bad Medium Medium None Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-F 11 12 13 14 15 15 15 15 15 14 Trace Bad Bad Medium Bad Trace Bad Bad Medium Bad None None None None None None None None None Bad None None None None None Y-l-G, 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 15 15 15 Trace Bad Medium Bad Bad Trace Bad Medium Bad Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None None Medium None Y-4-A. 11 12 13 14 15 15 16 14 16 16 Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium None None Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None 426 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Lot Y-4-B Can Vacuum No. Inches 11 12 13 14 15 Y-4-F 11 12 13 14 15 15 14 3 16 15 Cans Very bad Very bad Bad Trace Medium — Black Patches on ■ Bodies Tops Medium Medium Bad Trace Medium None None None None None 3 3 16 16 16 Bad Trace Bad Trace Trace Bad Trace Medium Trace Trace None None None None None Bottoms Very bad Very bad Bad None None Black in Contents None None None None None Y-4-C 11 15 Bad Bad None None Trace 12 15 Bad Bad Bad None Trace 13 15 Medium Medium None None None 14 14 Bad Medium None Bad None 15 16 Medium Medium None None None Y-4-D 11 15 Trace Trace None None None 12 16 Bad Bad None None None 13 16 Medium Medium None None None 14 17 Bad Bad None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None None Y-4-E..... 11 17 Bad Bad None None None 12 15 Bad Bad None None None 13 16 Medium Medium None None None 14 15 Very bad Bad None Very bad None 15 17 Bad Bad None None None None None Bad None None None None None None None Y-4-G Z-l-A Z-l-B 11 12 13 14 15- 11 12 13 14 15 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 15 17 17 12 13 17 16 20 14 16 15 16 15 Trace Medium Bad Medium Bad Bad Bad Trace None None Medium None Bad Medium Bad Trace Medium Bad Medium Bad Bad Bad Trace None None Medium None Bad Medium Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Very bad None None Medium None Z-l-C 11 12 13 14 15 17 15 14 15 15 Bad Bad Bad Bad Medium Bad Bad Medium Bad Medium None None None None None None None Bad None None None None None None None APPENDIX H 427 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Cin l * Lot No. V ticuuni Inches Cans ■ x>ltXCl£ Jr a Bodies Tops Bottoms Jb>l£lCl£ in Contents Z-l-D 11 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 12 16 None None None None Bad 13 16 Trace Trace None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 15 15 Medium Medium None None None Z-l-E 11 10 Trace Trace None None None 12 14 None None None None None 13 18 None None None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 None None None None None Z-l-F 11 14 Bad Bad None None Medium 12 14 Bad Bad None None None 13 16 Medium Medium None None None 14 14 None None None None None 15 16 Bad Bad None None None Z-l-G 11 12 Bad Bad None None None 12 10 Bad Bad None None None 13 14 Trace Trace None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None None None • 15 15 None None None None None 428 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 Lot W-l-A. Can Vacuum No. Inches 21 22 23 24 25 15 16 16 15 16 Cans Bad Bad Trace Bad None Black Patches on Tops Bodies Medium Trace None Bad Bad None None None None None Bottoms Bad Bad Trace Bad None Black in Contents Trace Medium Bad Trace Medium W-l-B. 21 22 23 24 25 15 17 19 16 17 Bad Bad None Bad Medium Bad Bad None Bad Medium None None None None None Bad None None Bad None Trace Trace None Trace None W-l-C. 21 22 23 24 25 17 16 15 15 15 Trace Very bad Medium Medium Trace Trace Very bad Medium None Trace None None None None None None Bad None Medium None None None None Trace None W-l-D 21 22 23 24 25 16 16 17 14 14 Very bad Bad Medium Very bad Medium Very bad Bad Medium Very bad Medium None None None None None Medium None None None None Trace None None None None W-l-E. 21 22 23 24 25 6 17 14 17 15 Medium Medium Medium Trace Medium Medium Medium Medium Trace Medium None None None None None Medium None Trace None Trace None None Trace None None W-l-F. 21 22 23 24 25 17 16 14 17 17 Medium Medium Bad Medium Medium None None Bad Medium Medium None None Bad None None Medium Medium None None Medium Trace None Bad None None W-l-G., 21 22 23 24 25 17 17 10 17 17 Medium Bad Medium Trace Medium Medium Bad Medium Trace Medium None None None None None None None None None None Trace Trace None None Trace W-2-A. 21 22 23 24 25 15 15 15 16 16 Bad Medium Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Medium None None None None None Trace None None None Bad Trace None None None None W-2-B. 21 22 23 24 25 17 4 17 16 21 Medium Medium Medium Bad Medium Medium Medium Medium Bad Medium None None None Bad None None None None None None Trace None None None None APPENDIX H 429 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Lot W-2-C. Can Vacuum , No. Inches Cans 21 22 23 24 25 15 17 15 15 16 Bad Bad Medium Trace Trace — Black Patches on Bodies Tops Bad None Bad None Medium None Trace None Trace None Bottoms Bad Bad None None None Black in Contents None None None None Trace W-2-D 21 15 Medium Medium None None None 22 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 23 14 Bad Medium None Bad None 24 16 Bad Bad . None Bad None 25 14 Bad Bad None Bad None W-2-E. 21 22 23 24 25 16 15 12 14 16 Medium Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None None None None None None None None Bad Bad Medium None None None Bad W-2-F. 21 22 23 24 25 15 16 16 14 16 Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Trace Trace Trace Trace Medium None None None None None Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None Trace None None Trace W-2-G.. 21 22 23 24 25 14 17 14 16 14 Medium None Medium Medium Bad Medium None Medium Medium Bad None None None None None None None Trace Medium Medium None Bad None None None X-l-A 21 22 23 24 25 14 16 14 16 16 Medium Bad Bad Bad Bad Medium Bad Bad Bad Bad None None None None None Medium Bad Bad None None None Trace None None Trace X-l-B 21 22 23 24 25 14 14 16 16 16 Bad Bad Bad Medium Bad Trace Trace Bad Medium Bad None None None None None Bad Bad None None None Trace None None None Trace X-l-C 21 22 23 24 25 17 15 15 16 15 Bad Medium Bad Medium Medium Bad Medium Bad Medium Medium None None None None None None Medium Bad Medium Medium Trace None Medium None None X-l-D. 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 17 14 Bad Medium Bad Bad Medium Bad Medium None None Medium None None None None None Medium None Bad Bad None None None None Trace None 430 APPENDIX H .Lot X-l-E INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Can Vacuum No. Inches 21 14 22 6 23 16 24 16 Cans Medium Medium Trace Medium Black Patches on Bodies Tops Medium None Trace None Trace None Medium None 25 15 Medium Medium None Bottoms None Medium None Medium None Black in Contents None None Trace None None X-l-F. 21 22 23 24 25 15 16 15 15 16 Bad Medium Medium Trace Trace Bad Medium Trace Trace Trace None None None None None None Medium Medium None None None Medium None None Trace X 1-G 21 22 23 24 25 16 16 16 15 17 Medium Trace Trace Very bad Bad Medium Trace Trace Very bad Bad None None None None None None None None Very bad None Trace None None Bad None X-3-A 21 22 23 24 25 14 14 14 16 17 Bad Bad Medium Bad Trace Bad Bad Medium Bad Trace None None None None None None None Medium None None None None Trace None None X-3-B 21 22 23 24 25 16 16 14 16 15 Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None None None None None Medium Medium Bad Bad None None None None Trace Trace X-3-C 21 22 23 24 25 16 14 16 14 15 Bad Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Bad Medium None None None None None Bad None None Bad Bad None None None None Trace X-3-D. 21 22 23 24 25 15 15 16 17 15 Bad Medium Medium Medium Medium Bad Medium Medium Medium Medium None None None None None Bad Medium Medium Medium None None None Trace None None X-3-E. 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 16 16 16 Medium Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Medium Trace None None None None None Trace None Medium Bad Bad None None None None Trace X-3-F. 21 22 23 24 25 15 16 15 15 16 Medium Medium Bad Medium Bad Medium Medium Bad Medium Bad None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None None None APPENDIX H 431 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Can No. "Rlnnlr PaffiVioc rv-n Black in Contents Lot V jicuuni Inches r Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms X-3-G 21 15 Bad Bad None None None 22 16 Bad Bad None None None 23 15 Bad Bad None Bad None 24 16 Medium Medium None None None 25 16 Trace Trace None None Trace Y-l-A 21 16 Bad Medium None Bad Bad 22 17 Trace Trace None None None 23 16 Bad Bad None None Trace 24 17 Medium Medium ■ None None Trace 25 15 Medium Medium None Medium Bad Y-l-B 21 14 Medium Medium None None None 22 16 Bad Bad None Bad Trace 23 15 Bad Bad None None Bad 24 15 Bad Bad None None Bad 25 15 Trace Trace None None Trace Y-l-C 21 15 Bad Bad None Medium None 22 14 Medium Medium None Medium None 23 15 Very bad Very bad None Bad Trace 24 16 Very bad Bad None Very bad Bad 25 16 Bad Bad None Bad None Y-l-D . . . .. 21 16 Bad Trace None Bad None 22 14 Bad Bad None Bad None 23 16 Medium Medium None Medium Medium 24 17 Bad Bad None Bad Trace 25 14 Bad Trace None Bad None Y-l-E 21 17 Bad Bad None Bad None 22 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 23 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 24 14 Very bad Very bad None Bad None 25 14 Very bad Very bad None Bad None Y-l-F 21 15 Medium Trace Medium None None 22 14 Bad Bad None Bad None 23 14 Bad Bad None None None 24 15 Medium Medium None None None 25 16 Bad Trace None Bad None Y-l-G 21 17 Medium None None Medium None 22 16 Bad Bad None Bad Medium 23 15 Medium Medium None None Medium 24 15 Bad Medium None Bad None 25 14 Bad Bad None None None Y-4-A 21 14 Medium Medium None Medium Trace 22 15 Medium Trace None Medium Trace 23 15 Trace Trace None None None 24 14 Medium Medium None None None 25 14 Bad Medium None Bad None 432 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued T^lpplr Pqtnliae r\n Lot No. V mc uum Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms Black in Contents Y-4-B 21 15 Medium Medium None None None 22 14 Medium Medium None None Bad 23 14 Bad Bad None None None 24 15 Medium Medium None None Trace 25 15 Trace Trace None None Trace Y-4-C 21 13 Bad Bad None None None 22 16 Bad Bad None None Medium 23 13 Bad Bad Trace None None 24 14 Bad Medium None Bad Trace 25 14 Medium None None None Trace Y-4-D 21 6 Medium Medium None Medium None 22 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 23 15 Medium Medium None Medium Trace 24 15 Medium Medium None None None 25 15 Bad Bad None Bad Trace Y-4-E 21 15 Bad Medium None Bad None 22 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 23 15 Very bad Medium None Very bad None 24 16 Bad Medium None Bad None 25 15 Bad Medium None Bad None Y-4-F . . . . . 21 13 Bad Bad None None Trace 22 14 Bad Medium None Bad None 23 16 Bad Medium None Bad None 24 15 Medium Medium None None Trace 25 15 Medium Medium None None Trace Y-4-G 21 16 Medium Medium None None None 22 16 Medium Medium None None None 23 15 Bad Bad None None None 24 15 Bad Bad None None None 25 16 Medium Medium None None None Z-l-A 21 15 Medium Medium None None Bad 22 15 Medium Medium None Medium Medium 23 15 Medium Medium None None None 24 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 25 17 Bad Medium None Bad None Z-l-B . . . . 21 16 Bad Trace None Bad None 22 16 Trace Trace None None Trace 23 16 Medium Medium None None None 24 16 Medium Medium None None None 25 16 Bad Trace None Bad None Z-l-C 21 17 Bad Bad None Medium None 22 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 23 16 Bad Medium None Bad None 24 16 Bad Bad None Bad None 25 15 Medium Trace None Medium None APPENDIX H 433 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Can No. Vacuum Inches T31ir»lr pfi+rtVinn *-.*-i Lot r Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms ijiacic in Contents Z-l-D 21 14 Bad Bad None Bad None 22 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 23 16 Bad Medium None Bad None 24 15 Medium Medium None None None 25 17 Medium Medium None None None Z-l-E 21 14 Bad Bad None Medium None 22 18 Medium Medium None None None 23 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 24 15 Medium Trace .None Medium None 25 15 Trace Trace None None None Z-l-F 21 12 Trace Trace None None None 22 15 Trace Trace None None None 23 15 Bad Medium None Bad None 24 15 Medium Medium None None None 25 15 Trace Trace None None None Z-l-G 21 15 Bad Bad None None None 22 15 Medium Medium None None None 23 15 Bad Bad None None None 24 13 Bad Bad None Bad None 25 17 None None None None None 434 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 Lot W-l-A. Can Vacuum No. Inches 31 32 33 34 35 15 16 17 17 16 Cans Medium Medium Trace Medium Medium — Black Patches on Bodies Tops Medium None Medium None Trace None Medium None Medium None Bottoms None None None None None Black in Contents Bad Bad None None None W-l-B. 31 32 33 34 35 17 16 17 18 17 Bad Medium Bad Medium Medium Bad Medium Bad Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None Trace Trace Trace None None W-l-C. 31 32 33 34 35 15 17 17 15 16 Bad Medium Bad Medium Medium Bad Medium Bad Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None Medium None None None Medium W-l-D 31 32 33 34 35 15 14 16 15 15 Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None Trace Trace None None Medium W-l-E. 31 32 33 34 35 16 17 17 17 16 Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None Trace None None Trace Trace W-l-F. 31 32 33 34 35 18 17 17 16 15 Trace Trace Medium Medium Bad Trace Trace Medium Medium Bad None None None None None None None None None None Medium Medium None Trace None W-l-G. 31 32 33 34 35 17 16 16 15 17 None Bad Trace Bad Bad None Bad Trace Bad Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None Trace W-2-A. 31 32 33 34 35 17 16 17 17 17 Medium Trace Trace Medium Trace Medium Trace Trace Medium Trace None None None None None None None None None None Trace Bad None None None W-2-B. 31 32 33 34 35 15 18 16 16 Bad Bad Medium Medium Very bad Bad Bad Medium Medium Bad None None None None None None Trace None None Very bad None None None None None APPENDIX H 435 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Can Vacuum Black Patches on — Black in Lot No. Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms Contents W-2-C. . . .. 31 17 Trace Trace None None None 32 16 Bad Bad None Bad Trace 33 18 Bad Bad None None Trace 34 2 Bad Medium None Bad None 35 17 Bad Medium None Bad None W-2-D . .. 31 16 Bad Medium None Bad None 32 16 Bad Medium None Bad None 33 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 34 16 Bad Medium •None Bad None 35 16 Bad Medium None Bad None W-2-E 31 13 Trace Trace None None Bad 32 13 Medium Medium None None None 33 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 34 16 Medium Medium None Medium Trace 35 15 Medium Trace None Medium None W-2-F 31 15 Medium Medium None None None 32 17 Medium Medium None None None 33 17 Medium Medium None None Trace 34 17 Medium Medium None None None 35 15 Medium Medium None None Bad W-2-G 31 18 Medium Medium None None None 32 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 33 17 Medium Medium None None None 34 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 35 16 Bad None None Bad None X-l-A 31 16 Bad Bad None None Trace 32 19 Medium Medium None None None 33 17 Medium Medium None None None 34 15 Medium Medium Medium None None 35 16 Bad Bad None None Trace X-l-B 31 15 Bad Medium None Bad None 32 17 Medium Medium None None None 33 16 Bad Bad None None Trace 34 17 Bad Medium None Bad Medium 35 17 Medium Medium None Trace None X-l-C 31 17 Bad Bad None Bad None 32 16 Bad Medium None Bad Medium 33 16 Bad Bad None None None 34 16 Bad Bad None Bad None 35 16 Bad Medium None Bad None X-l-D 31 15 Medium Medium None None None 32 17 Bad Bad None Bad Medium 33 17 Bad Medium Bad Bad Trace 34 15 Medium Medium None None None 35 16 Bad Bad Trace None None 435 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Can V&cuuni IBls^ck T^^+^V>^c* <-»n Lot No. Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms -DicLCic in Contents X-l-E 31 16 Very bad Very bad None None None 32 18 Bad Bad None None None 33 17 Medium Medium None None Medium 34 16 Medium Medium None None Very bad 35 16 Medium Medium None None None X-l-F 31 16 Medium Medium None None None 32 17 Medium Medium None None None 33 17 None None None None None 34 16 Medium Medium None None None 35 16 Bad Bad None None None X-l-G... . 31 17 Medium Medium None None None 32 16 Medium Medium None None None 33 17 Bad None Bad None None 34 18 Bad None Bad None None 35 17 Bad Bad None None None X-3-A 31 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 32 16 Trace None None Trace None 33 18 Medium Medium None Medium None 34 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 35 15 Bad Bad None Medium None X-3-B 31 7 Medium Medium None Medium Trace 32 15 Medium Medium None Trace None 33 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 34 16 Bad Bad None Medium Trace 35 17 Medium Medium None Medium None X-3-C 31 15 Medium Medium None None None 32 17 Medium Medium None Medium None 33 15 Bad None None Bad Trace 34 15 Bad Medium None Bad Trace 35 15 Bad Bad * None None None X-3-D 31 17 Medium Medium None None None 32 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 33 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 34 17 Medium Medium None None None 35 17 Medium Medium None Trace None X-3-E 31 16 Bad Medium None Bad None 32 16 Bad None None Bad None 33 17 Very bad Medium None Very bad None 34 17 Very bad Medium None Very bad None 35 17 Bad Medium None Bad None X-3-F 31 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 32 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 33 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 34 17 Bad Medium None Bad Medium 35 16 Bad Bad None Bad None APPENDIX H 437 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Can T-T 1 1 r* 1 r T* «-» •*■ « i-» « ™ *■»■*-* Lot No. v cicuuin Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms JtJlacK in Contents X-3-G 31 16 None None None None None 32 17 None None None None None 33 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 34 16 Bad Bad None None None 35 15 Bad Bad None None None Y-l-A 31 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 32 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 33 15 Medium Medium None Medium Medium 34 16 Medium Medium None Medium Medium ' 35 16 Medium Medium None Medium None Y-l-B 31 17 Medium None None Medium None 32 16 Medium None None Medium None 33 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 34 16 Bad Bad None Medium None 35 10 Bad Bad None Medium None Y-l-C 31 14 Medium Medium None Medium None 32 17 Medium Medium None None None 33 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 34 15 Bad Medium None Bad None 35 15 Medium Medium None None None Y-l-D 31 14 Medium Medium None Medium None 32 17 Medium Medium None None None 33 15 None None None None None 34 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 35 16 Medium Medium None Medium None Y-l-E 31 16 Bad Medium None Bad None 32 11 Medium Medium None None None 33 17 Medium Medium None None None 34 14 Medium Medium None None None 35 15 Bad Medium None Bad None Y-l-F 31 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 32 16 Medium Medium None None None 33 16 Medium Medium None None None 34 14 Medium Medium None None None 35 15 Bad Bad None Medium None Y-l-G 31 15 Bad Bad None Medium None 32 15 Medium Medium None None None 33 17 Medium Medium None Medium None 34 16 Medium Medium None None None 35 15 Bad Bad None None Medium Y-4-A 31 7 Medium Medium -None None None 32 15 Medium Medium None None None 33 15 Bad None None Bad None 34 16 Medium Medium None None None 35 16 None None None None None 438 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Lot Y-4-B Can Vacuum No. Inches 31 32 33 34 35 16 14 15 16 16 Cans None Medium Bad Medium Medium — Black Patches on Bodies Tops None Medium Bad Medium None None None None None None Bottoms None None None None Medium Black in Contents None None None None None Y-4-C 31 32 33 34 35 16 16 16 16 16 Medium Bad Medium Medium Medium Medium None Bad None None None Medium None None None Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None None None None None Y-4-D 31 32 33 34 35 17 17 16 17 15 Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None None None None None Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None None None None None Y-4-E. 31 32 33 34 35 16 15 17 15 16 Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None None None None None Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium None None None None None Y-4-F 31 32 33 34 35 15 16 15 15 16 Medium Medium None Trace None Medium Medium None Trace None None None None None None Medium Medium None Trace None None None None None None Y-4-G 31 32 33 34 35 15 17 15 17 16 Medium Bad Bad Bad Bad Trace Bad Bad Bad Bad None None None None None Medium Medium Medium Medium Bad None None None None None Z-l-A 31 32 33 34 35 14 16 16 16 16 None Medium Medium Medium None None Medium Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-B 31 32 33 34 35 16 15 17 22 17 Medium Medium Medium Bad None None Medium Medium Bad None None None None None None Medium Medium Medium Bad None None None None None None Z-l-C 31 32 33 34 35 15 16 15 15 17 Medium Medium Bad Medium None Medium Medium Bad Medium None None None None None None Medium Medium Bad None None None None None None None APPENDIX H 439 INSPECTION DATA— INDIANA CORN— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 — Continued Can toVo( Lot No. Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms .tslaCrC in Contents Z-l-D 31 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 32 16 Medium Medium None Medium None 33 17 None None None None None 34 17 None None None None None 35 17 Medium Medium None None None Z-l-E . . . . 31 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 32 17 None None None None None 33 15 Medium Medium None None None 34 17 Bad Medium None Bad None 35 17 Bad None None Bad None Z-l-F. 31 15 Medium Medium None Medium None 32 15 Medium None None Medium None 33 15 Medium None None Medium None 34 15 Medium None None Medium None 35 16 Bad Bad None Bad None Z-l-G 31 14 Medium None None Medium None 32 14 None None None None None 33 13 Bad Bad None None None 34 13 Medium None None Medium None 35 8 None None None None None 440 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End) First Preliminary Inspection, September 15, 1915 One can of each lot was inspected. No black was found in any can. APPENDIX H 441 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Second Preliminary Inspection, October 11, 1915 Black Patches Lot on Cans W-l-A Medium Trace W-l-B None Very bad W-l-C None Trace W-l-D None None W-l-E None None W-l-F None None W-l-G . . None None W-2-A Very bad Very bad W-2-B Trace Trace W-2-C Very bad Bad W-2-D None None W-2-E None None W-2-F None None W-2-G None None X-l-A Very bad Trace X-l-B Bad Trace X-l-C Bad Bad X-l-D None None X-l-E None None X-l-F None None X-l-G None None X-3-A Bad Bad X-3-B None Bad X-3-C None None X-3-D None None Black Patches Lot on Cans X-3-E None None X-3-F None None X-3-G None None Y-l-A None Very bad Y-l-B Trace Trace Y-l-C Trace None Y-l-D Bad Bad Y-l-E' Bad None Y-l-F None None Y-l-G Bad None Y-4-A Bad Very bad Y-4-B Very bad Very bad Y-4-C Bad Very bad Y-4-D Very bad Bad Y-4-E Medium Bad Y-4-F None None Y-4-G None Bad Z-l-A . Trace Trace Z-l-B Medium None Z-l-C Bad Trace Z-l-D Medium Bad Z-l-E None None Z-l-F Trace None Z-l-G None None 442 APPENDIX H A— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)- -Continued shington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 35 13 Bad None 39 13 Very bad None 40 15 None None 41 14 Medium None 42 12 Trace None 40 12 None None 42 14 None None 43 13 None None 44 14 Trace None 45 14 None None 40 12 None None 41 14 None None 42 14 None None 43 13 Bad None 44 14 Trace None 17 15 None None 18 15 None None 19 13 None None 20 14 None None 21 14 None None 42 12 None None 43 13 None None 44 13 None None 45 15 Trace None 46 13 None None 17 13 None None 18 12 Trace None 19 14 None None 20 14 Trace None 21 13 Trace None 40 15 None None 42 16 None None 43 13 None None 44 10 None None 45 13 None None 35 14 Bad Trace 39 14 Bad Trace 42 14 Bad Trace 43 15 Bad Trace 44 13 Bad Trace Lot W-l-A W-l-B W-l-C W-l-D W-l-E W-l-F W-l-G W-2-A APPENDIX H 443 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Lot W-2-B W-2-C W-2-D W-2-E W-2-F W-2-G X-l-A X-l-B X-l-C Can Number 41 Vacuum Inches 14 Black Patches on Cans - Bad Black in Contents Trace 42 14 Trace None 43 14 Bad None 44 14 Bad None 45 15 Bad Trace 40 12 None None 41 13 Medium None 42 14 Bad Trace 43 12 Bad None 44 14 Very bad Bad 41 13 Medium None 42 14 Medium None 43 13 None None 44 13 None None 45 13 None None 37 13 None None 38 13 None None 41 14 None None 43 12 Trace None 39 13 None None 41 14 Very bad None 42 43 44 45 13 13 13 13 Very bad Very bad Very bad Trace None None None None 36 13 None None 39 14 None None 35 14 None None 43 14 None None 46 14 None None 41 12 Bad None 42 12 Trace None 43 13 Bad None 44 12 Bad None 45 13 None None 41 14 None None 42 13 Trace None 43 14 None Trace 44 14 None None 45 13 None None 41 14 Trace None 42 14 Medium None 43 13 None None 44 14 Bad None 45 14 Bad None 444 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Lot X-l-D X-l-E X-l-F X-l-G X-3-A X-3-B X-3-C X-3-D X-3-E Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 39 J 2 None None 40 13 None None 42 14 Medium None 43 13 None None 44 13 None None 35 14 None None 36 11 None Trace 39 13 None None 40 13 None Medium 43 14 None None 41 14 Trace None 42 12 Trace None 43 13 None None 44 13 None None 45 14 None None 41 14 Trace None 42 13 Trace None 43 14 None None 44 15 None None 45 14 None None 41 13 None None 42 13 Bad None 43 13 None None 44 13 Trace None 45 12 None None 35 13 Medium None 39 13 Bad None 38 11 None None 43 13 None None 44 14 None None 41 13 None None 42 13 None None 43 13 None None 38 14 None None 45 14 None None 35 13 None None 36 13 None None 38 12 None None 39 14 None None 40 14 None Note 41 13 None None 42 12 None None 43 13 None None 44 13 None None 39 11 None None APPENDIX H 445 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Lot X-3-F X-3-G Y-l-A Y-l-B Y-l-C Y-l-D Y-l-E Y-l-F Y-l-G Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 39 12 None None 42 14 None None 43 14 None None 44 14 None Medium 45 14 None Medium 37 13 Bad None 41 13 None None 42 13 None None 43 14 ■ None None 44 14 None None 41 12 None None 42 11 None None 43 13 Bad None 44 .13 Bad None 45 13 None None 37 13 Very bad None 41 13 Medium None 42 13 Trace None 43 13 None None 44 13 None None 41 15 Trace None 42 14 Trace None 43 13 Trace None 44 15 None None 45 14 None None 41 14 Bad None 42 14 Bad. None 43 12 Bad None 44 13 Trace None 45 14 Very bad None 23 14 None None 42 14 Medium None 43 16 None None 44 14 None None 45 14 Trace None 41 15 None None 42 14 None None 43 14 None None 44 13 None None 45 13 None None 23 15 None Trace 38 14 None None 41 14 None None 42 15 Bad None 45 14 None None 446 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Lot Y-4-A Y-4-B Y-4-C Y-4-D Y-4-E Y-4-F Y-4-G Z-l-A Z-l-B Can Number 41 Vacuum Inches 13 Black Patches on Cans Bad Black in Contents Bad 42 13 Very bad None 43 44 12 12 Very bad Very bad None None 45 13 Very bad Trace 41 12 Bad Bad 42 13 Bad None 37 38 39 13 14 13 Very bad Very bad Very bad None Very bad Medium 41 15 Very bad None 42 14 None None 43 13 Medium None 44 14 Medium None 45 14 Medium None 41 14 None None 42 14 Trace None 43 44 13 14 Very bad None None None 45 13 Medium None 37 14 Trace None 41 15 Trace Medium 42 14 Trace None 43 15 Trace None 45 14 Very bad None 39 14 Trace None 42 14 None None 43 14 None None 44 14 None None 45 15 None None 42 14 None None 43 15 None None 44 15 None None 46 15 None None 41 14 None None 41 14 Trace None 42 14 Bad Medium 43 44 14 14 Very bad None None None 39 14 Very bad None 41 14 None None 42 13 None None 43 14 Medium Medium 44 16 None None 45 13 None None APPENDIX H 447 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Lot Z-l-C Z-l-D Z-l-E Z-l-F Z-l-G Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 41 13 Medium None 42 15 Trace None 43 15 None None 44 17 Bad None 45 14 Trace Medium 41 13 None None 42 13 None None 43 15 Medium None 44 13 Medium None 38 14 Bad None 40 15 None None 41 15 None None 42 14 None None 43 14 Trace None 44 14 None None 41 1? None None 42 15 None None 43 14 None None 44 15 None None 45 15 None None 41 17 None None 42 15 None None 43 13 None None 44 13 None None 45 13 None None 448 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot W-l-A W-l-B W-l-C W-l-D W-l-E W-l-F W-l-G W-2-A Can Number 33 Vacuum Inches 12 Black Patches on Cans None Black in Contents None 34 14 Trace None 36 13 Medium None 37 19 Trace None 38 14 Trace None 34 13 None None 35 14 None None 36 15 Trace None 39 14 Bad None 41 14 None None 32 13 None None 33 14 Medium None 36 14 None None 37 12 None None 38 14 None None 11 12 None None 12 13 None None 14 13 None None 15 14 Medium None 16 14 None None 35 14 Trace None 36 12 Trace None 39 12 None None 40 14 Medium None 41 14 Medium None 35 13 Bad None 36 14 None None 38 '12 Medium None 39 12 Bad None 40 14 None None 9 14 Trace None 10 14 None None 13 14 Bad None 14 14 Bad None 15 2 (dented) None None 36 38 40 41 45 13 13 14 14 14 Very bad Very bad Very bad Very bad Bad None None None None None APPENDIX H 449 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Lot W-2-B W-2-C W-2-D W-2-E W-2-F W-2-G X-l-A X-l-B X-l-C Can Vacuum Black Patehes Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 34 14 Medium None 37 14 Trace None 38 15 Medium None 39 13 None None 40 14 None None 34 13 Very bad None 35 12 Medium ' None 37 14 Very bad None 38 14 Medium None 39 15 Bad None 35 13 Bad None 36 13 Verv bad None 38 13 Bad' None 39 14 Bad None 40 9 Bad None 33 , 14 Bad None 34 14 None None 35 13 None None 40 11 Very bad None 44 ' 14 Very bad None 35 14 Medium None 36 13 Trace None 38 14 Bad None 39 14 Bad None 40 14 Medium None 34 14 Trace None 37 11 None None 38 13 Medium None 41 12 Medium None 45 13 Trace None 35 14 Very bad None 36 13 None None 38 12 Trace None 39 14 Very bad None 40 12 None None 33 14 Bad None 34 14 Very bad None 37 14 Trace None 38 13 Bad None 39 13 Bad None 33 13 Trace None 34 13 None None 37 13 Trace None 38 14 Bad None 39 13 Trace None 450 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Lot X-l-D X-l-E X-l-F X-l-G X-3-A X-3-B X-3-C X-3-D X-3-E Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 35 13 Trace None 36 13 Trace None 38 15 Medium None 41 14 Medium None 45 13 None None 34 13 None None 38 15 Medium None 41 14 Very bad None 42 14 Very bad None 45 14 Trace None 35 14 Bad None 36 13 Medium None 38 14 Medium None 39 14 Bad None 40 14 Medium None 33 13 None None 34 13 Very bad None 35 15 Very bad None 37 5 Medium None 38 12 Medium None. 33 14 Bad None 34 13 None None 37 14 Medium None 38 13 Medium None 39 13 Bad None 34 14 Trace None 36 13 None None 40 12 Trace None 41 14 None None 45 14 Trace None 33 13 None None 34 13 None None 35 14 None None 37 14 Medium None 39 14 None None 30 14 Medium None 31 13 Medium None 33 14 Bad * None 34 13 Trace None 37 14 None None 33 13 13 Medium Trace None 34 None 35 14 Medium None 37 13 Medium None 38 13 Medium None APPENDIX H 451 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Lot X-3-F X-3-G Y-l-A Y-l-B Y-l-C Y-l-D Y-l-E Y-l-F Y-l-G Can Vacuum Black Patohes Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 35 14 None None 37 14 None None 38 13 None None 40 11 None None 41 12 Very bad None 33 11 Medium None 34 13 Medium None 35 13 Medium None 38 14 ■ ' None None 39 14 None None 33 12 Medium None 34 12 Bad None 37 14 Very bad None 38 -i ,1 Trace None 39 12 None None 33 10 Medium None 34 12 Trace None 35 14 Bad None 38 13 Bad None 39 12 Medium None 35 14 Bad None 36 13 Very bad None 38 13 Very bad None 39 13 Bad None 40 12 Bad None 35 13 Medium None 36 13 Medium None 38 13 Bad None 39 13 Medium None 40 12 Medium None 33 5 Medium None 34 13 Medium None 38 12 None None 39 1 None None 41 12 Medium None 35 14 Very bad None 36 12 Very bad None 38 12 Trace None 39 13 Bad None 40 14 Bad None 33 15 Medium None 34 14 Medium None 35 14 Medium None 37 15 Medium None 39 14 Medium None 452 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Lot VT-4-A Y-4-B Y-4-C Y-4-D Y-4-E Y-4-F Y-4-G z-I-A Z-l-B Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 35 14 Very bad None 36 IT Very bad None 38 14 Very bad None 39 14 None None 40 13 Very bad None 35 4 Very bad None 34 12 Very bad None 35 12 Very bad None 36 3 Very bad None 40 14 Very bad None 35 14 Medium None 36 13 Trace None 38 14 Very bad None 39 15 Bad None 40 14 None None 35 5 None None 36 12 Trace None 38 14 Trace None 39 14 Trace None 40 15 Trace None 33 14 Medium None 34 14 Bad None 35 14 Trace None 38 15 Medium None 39 14 Very bad None 34 14 Medium None 35 13 Bad None 36 14 Very bad None 38 14 Medium None 40 13 Trace None 33 15 None None 34 14 Medium None 37 14 Medium None 38 13 Very bad None 39 13 Bad None 34 8 Bad None 35 13 None None 36 14 Medium None 38 15 Medium None 40 3 Bad None 35 12 Bad None 36 13 Medium None 38 13 Medium None 39 14 Medium None 40 13 Trace None APPENDIX H 453 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Lot Z-l-C Z-l-D Z-lrE Z-l-F Z-l-G Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 34 13 Trace None 35 13 Trace None 37 13 Medium None 38 14 Medium None 39 14 Medium None 33 13 Medium None 34 12 Medium None 35 14 Medium None 37 5 Medium None 39 13 Medium None 34 15 Trace None 35 14 Medium None 36 13 Trace None 38 13 Medium None 39 14 Medium None 34 15 Medium None 35 15 Trace None 38 14 Medium None 39 15 Medium None 40 15 Medium None 33 14 Bad None 34 14 Medium None 35 15 Trace None 37 16 Medium None 39 15 Bad None 454 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Lot W-l-A W-l-B W-l-C W-l-D W-l-E W-l-F W-l-G W-2-A Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 26 14 None None 29 15 Trace None 30 13 Trace None 31 15 Trace None 32 15 Trace None 29 14 Trace None 30 15 Trace None 33 15 Trace None 37 15 None None 38 15 Trace None 30 15 None' None 31 14 Trace None 34 16 Trace None 35 14 Trace None 39 15 Trace None 7 13 Trace None 8 15 Trace None 9 15 None None 10 14 None None 13 14 Trace None 31 19 Bad None 32 14 Medium None 31 14 Medium None 37 15 Medium None 38 14 Trace None 30 15 15 Trace None None 31 None 33 14 Medium None 34 15 Bad None 37 14 Medium None 2 13 15 Trace Medium None • 5 None 6 16 Trace None 7 15 Trace None ' 11 15 Medium None 30 13 14 Trace Bad None 31 Bad 33 15 Bad None 34 13 Bad None 37 15 Bad Trace APPENDIX H 455 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Lot W-2-B W-2-C VY-2-D W-2-E W-2-F W-2-G X-l-A X-l-B X-l-C Can Vacuum Black Patches Black umber Inches on Cans in Contents 30 ' 6 Medium None 31 14 Medium None 33 14 Trace None 35 15 Bad None 36 15 Trace None 29 16 Bad None 30 15 Medium None 32 15 Bad None 33 8 Medium None 36 14 Bad None 31 15 Medium None 32 15 Bad None 33 15 Very bad None 34 15 Medium None 37 13 Trace None 26 - 13 Medium None 27 15 Bad None 29 13 Bad None 30 14 Medium None 31 14 Trace None 27 14 Trace None 30 14 Bad None 31 15 Trace None 34 15 Bad None 37 16 Trace None 27 15 Trace None 28 15 Bad None 31 15 Very bad None 32 15 Bad None 33 15 Bad None 31 12 Medium None 32 15 Medium None 33 14 Trace None 34 15 Medium None 37 15 Medium None 30 15 Trace None 31 15 Medium None 35 15 Bad None 36 11 Bad None 40 15 Bad None 29 15 Trace None 30 15 Trace None 31 15 Bad None 35 15 Bad None 40 15 Bad None 456 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Lot Number Inches on Cans in Contents X 1-D 26 13 3 Bad Trace None 27 None 30 13 Trace None 31 14 Trace None 32 15 Medium None X 1-E 28 14 15 Trace Bad None 32 None 33 15 Bad None 37 15 Bad None 44 15 Medium None X-l-F 27 3 Medium None 31 15 Bad None 33 15 Bad None 34 15 Medium None 37 13 Bad None X-l-G 26 14 8 Trace Medium None 30 None 36 15 Bad None 39 14 Trace None 40 15 Bad None> X-3-A 25 14 15 Medium Trace Medium 29 None 30 15 Bad None 37 14 Trace None 35 15 Medium Trace X-3-B 27 15 15 Trace Medium None 30 None 32 15 Trace None 33 14 Trace None 37 15 Medium None X-3-C 26 3 14 Medium Bad None 30 None 31 13 Medium None 36 10 Medium None 40 15 Trace None X-3-D 25 15 14 Bad Bad None 26 None 27 15 Medium None 29 13 Bad None 32 14 Trace None X-3-E . 25 13 Medium None 26 14 Bad None 29 15 Medium None 30 14 Medium None 31 14 Medium None APPENDIX H 457 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Lot X-3-F X-3-G Y-l-A Y-l-B Y-l-C Y-l-D Y-l-E Y-l-F VT-l-G Can rumber 27 Vacuum Inches 13 Black Patches on Cans - Trace Black in Contents None 31 14 Bad Trace 33 12 None None 34 15 None None 36 15 None None 27 15 Bad None 31 15 Bad None 32 15 Bad None 36 15 Bad None 40 10 Trace None 27 14 None None 31 13 Medium None 35 14 Trace None 36 14 Bad None 40 14 Medium None 26 14 Medium None 29 10 Bad None 30 15 None None 36 3 Bad None 40 4 Bad None 28 15 Bad None 32 15 Trace None 33 15 Bad None 34 14 Bad None 37 14 Medium None 27 15 Bad. None 31 15 Bad None 33 15 Bad None 34 14 Medium None 37 13 Medium None 30 13 Medium None 32 14 Bad None 35 10 Bad None 37 15 Trace None 40 14 Bad None 31 15 Medium None 32 14 Medium None 33 13 Medium None 34 2 Trace None 37 13 None None 27 15 Medium None 30 15 Medium None 31 15 Medium None 36 15 Medium None 40 15 Trace None 458 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Lot Y-4-A Y-l-B Y-4-C Y-4-D Y-4-E Y-4-F Y-4-G Z-l-A Z-l-B Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 27 15 Bad None 31 13 Bad Trace 33 15 Medium None 34 14 Bad None 37 15 Bad None 27 6 Trace None 28 15 Medium Trace 30 13 Medium None 31 14 Bad Trace 32 14 Bad None 26 15 Bad None 30 14 Medium None 33 15 Bad Trace 34 14 Trace None 37 15 Trace None 27 15 Medium None 31 3 Medium None 33 15 Trace None 34 15 Bad None 37 15 Trace None 26 15 Medium None 30 14 Bad None 31 15 Bad None 36 15 Bad . None 40 15 Trace None 30 15 Bad None 31 14 Trace None 32 15 Medium None 33 15 Bad None 37 15 Medium None 27 15 Bad None 30 15 Trace None 35 15 Trace None 36 15 Medium None 40 15 Medium None 27 16 Trace None 28 3 Bad None 32 16 Bad None 33 15 Bad Trace 37 15 Medium None 31 10 Trace None 32 14 Medium None 33 15 Medium Trace 34 16 Bad None 37 15 Bad None APPENDIX H 459 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Lot Z-l-C Z-l-D Z-l-E ., Z-l-F Z-l-G Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans ' in Contents 27 15 Bad Trace 31 15 Trace None 33 15 Medium Trace 36 15 Bad None 40 14 Medium None 28 15 Medium None 31 15 Medium None 32 15 Medium None 36 15 . Trace None 40 14 Medium None 27 15 Bad None 28 15 Bad None 30 15 Medium None 31 15 Bad None 32 15 Bad None 27 15 Bad None 28 14 Medium None 31 15 Bad None 32 15 Bad None 36 15 Medium None 28 15 Bad None 32 15 Bad None 31 12 Medium None 36 15 Medium None 40 15 Medium None 4bU APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA A— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)- -Continued Vashingi ton Inspection, July 31, 1916 Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Content 25 12 Medium None 27 13 Trace None 28 14 Bad None 25 13 None None 26 13 None None 27 14 Trace None 28 14 None None 31 13 Medium None 24 12 Medium None 25 14 Bad None 26 14 Medium None 27 13 Medium None 28 12 Medium None 1 13 Bad None 2 12 Bad None 3 13 Bad None 4 14 Medium None 5 14 Bad None 25 12 Bad None 26 11 Bad None 27 13 Bad None 28 11 Bad None 29 14 Bad None 25 14 Bad None 26 13 Bad None 27 14 Bad None 28 13 Medium None 29 10 Bad None 1 11 Trace None 3 , 15 Very bad None 4 13 Bad None 8 14 Bad None 12 10 None None 25 13 Medium None 26 12 Very bad None 27 11 Bad None 28 12 Bad None 29 14 Medium None Lot W-l-A W-l-B W-l-C W-l-D W-l-E W-l-F W-l-G W-2-A APPENDIX H 461 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Lot W-2-B W-2-C W-2-D W-2-E W-2-F W-2-G X-l-A X-l-B X-l-C Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 25 13 Medium None 26 14 None None 27 13 Trace None 28 17 Bad None 29 13 Bad None 24 12 Bad None 25 14 Bad None 26 13 Very bad None 27 13 Very bad None 28 13 Bad None 25 14 Very bad None 28 13 Bad None 27 12 Bad None 28 11 Bad None 29 v 13 Medium None 24 7 Trace None 25 12 Bad None 28 14 Bad None 32 12 Trace None 36 Bad None 25 14 None None 26 5 Bad None 28 12 Bad None 29 14 Bad None 32 15 Bad None 25 14 Bad None 26 14 None None 29 12 Medium None 30 14 Bad None 25 11 Medium None 26 11 Medium None 27 11 Trace None 28 12 Trace None 29 11 Trace None 25 15 Bad None 26 12 Bad None 27 11 Bad None 28 4 Medium None 29 14 Bad None 25 13 Bad None 26 14 Bad None 27 14 Bad None 28 13 Bad None 32 11 Medium None 462 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Lot X-l-D X-l-E X-l-F X-l-G X-3-A X-3-B X-3-C X-3-D X-3-E Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans in Contents 25 11 Medium None 28 13 Bad None 29 13 Bad None 34 12 Bad None 37 11 Bad None 25 14 Medium None 26 14 Medium None 27 13 Medium None 29 12 Medium None 30 12 Bad • None 25 13 Bad None 26 4 Bad None 28 11 Bad None 29 , 13 Bad None 30 13 Medium None 25 12 Medium None 27 14 Medium None 28 12 Medium None 29 13 Trace None 31 13 Bad None 26 13 Medium None 27 12 Medium None 28 12 Bad None 32 13 Bad Trace 36 11 Trace None 25 4 Trace None 26 4 Medium None 28 12 Medium None 29 11 Medium None 25 13 Medium None 27 12 Medium None 28 5 Medium None 29 11 Bad None 32 13 Medium None 28 12 Very bad None 31 12 None None 32 9 None None 27 12 Bad None 28 13 Bad None 36 14 Bad None 10 13 Bad None APPENDIX H 463 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Lot X-3-F X-3-G Y-l-A Y-l-B Y-l-C Y-l-D Y-l-E Y-l-F Y-l-G Can Vacuum Black Patches Black umber Inches on Cans' in Contents 25 12 Trace None 26 12 Trace None 28 13 Trace None 29 11 Medium None 30 13 Bad None 25 13 Bad None 26 13 Medium None 28 12 Bad None 29 12 ■ • Bad None 30 7 Bad None 25 11 None None 26 13 Bad None 28 4 None None 29 13 Trace None 30 13 Trace None 25 13 Bad None 27 6 Bad None 28 16 Bad None 31 13 Bad None 32 13 Medium None 25 14 Bad None 26 11 Bad None 27 14 Bad None 29 13 Bad None 30 11 Medium None 25 12 Bad None 26 10 Bad None 28 12 Bad None 29 12 Bad None 30 12 Medium None 25 13 Medium None 26 13 Bad None 27 10 Medium None 28 12 Medium None 29 14 Bad None 25 12 None None 26 14 None None 27 13 Medium None 28 12 Medium None 29 12 Medium None 25 3 Medium None 26 15 Bad None 28 13 Medium None 29 13 Medium None 464 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Lot Y-4-A Y-4-B Y-4-C Y-4-D Y-4-E Y-4-F Y-4-G Z-l-A Z-l-B Can Vacuum Black Patches Black umber Inches on Cans in Content 25 11 Medium None 26 14 Bad None 28 13 Bad None 29 13 Bad None 30 14 Bad None 25 12 Medium None 26 9 None None 29 14 Medium None 25 14 Bad None 27 13 Bad None 28 14 None None 29 11 Bad None 32 13 Bad None 25 8 Bad None 26 14 Very bad None 28 13 Trace None 29 14 Bad None 30 13 Medium None 25 12 Bad None 27 18 Bad None 28 13 Bad None 29 12 Bad None 32 11 Bad None 25 3 Bad None 26 11 Bad None 27 14 Bad None 28 14- Bad None 29 lS Bad None 25 13 Bad None 26 14 Bad None 29 14 Medium None 32 14 Bad None 25 15 Medium None 26 13 Trace None 29 13 Medium None 30 14 Medium None 31 13 Medium None 25 11 Bad None 27 12 Medium None 28 11 Bad None 29 12 Bad None 30 14 Bad None APPENDIX H 465 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on End)— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Lot Z-l-C Z-l-D Z-l-E Z-l-F Z-l-G Can Vacuum Black Patches Black Number Inches on Cans ' in Contents 25 15 Bad None 26 15 Medium None 28 15 Very bad None 29 13 Bad None 30 13 Bad None 25 6 Bad None 26 14 Bad None 27 14 Very bad None 29 14 . Bad None 30 14 Bad None 25 15 Bad None 26 14 Bad None 29 14 Medium None 33 15 Medium None 37 15 Trace None 25 15 Medium None 26 14 Bad None 29 15 Bad None 30 15 Bad None 33 14 Bad None 25 14 Bad None 27 14 Bad None 30 14 Bad None 456 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side) First Preliminary Inspection, September 15, 1915 Lot Cans W-l-A Very bad W-l-B Very bad W-l-C Very bad W-l-D None W-l-E Medium W-l-F Medium W-l-G None W-2-A Very bad W-2-B None W-2-C None V-2-D None W-2-E Very bad W-2-F None W-2-G None X-l-A Bad X-l-B Bad X-l-C None X-l-D Bad X-l-E Medium X-l-F Medium X-l-G None X-3-A Medium X-3-B None X-3-C Bad X-3-D Medium X-3-E None X-3-F None X-3-G None Y-l-A None Y-l-B Trace Y-l-C , Medium Y 1-D None Y-l-E None Y-l-F None Y-l-G None Y-4-A Bad Y-4-B Bad Y-4-C Bad Y-4-D Trace Y-4-E Medium Y-4-F Trace Y-4-G None Z-l-A None Z-l-B Medium Z-l-C Medium ; -1-D Bad Z-l-E None Z-l-F None Z-l-G None Black Patches on — Bodies Tops Bottoms Very bad None None Very bad None None Very bad None None None None None Medium None None Medium None None None None None Very bad Bad None None None None None None None None None None Very bad None None None None None None None None Bad Bad None Bad None None None None None Bad None None Medium None None Medium None None None None None Medium None None None None None None None None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None. None None Bad Bad None Bad Bad None Medium Bad None Trace None None Medium None None None Trace None None None None None None None Medium None None Medium None None Bad None None None None None None None None None None None APPENDIX H 467 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Second Preliminary Inspection, October 11, 1915 Bottoms None Bad Bad Bad Medium None Trace None Trace None . None None None None None None None None None None , Black Patches on — Lot Cans Bodies Tops W-l-A Very bad Very bad None Very bad Very bad Trace Very bad Very bad None W-l-B Bad Bad None Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None W-l-C. . . .' Very bad Very bad None Bad Bad None Bad Bad Bad W-l-D Bad Bad Trace Bad Bad Bad W-l-E Very bad Very bad Trace Very bad Very bad Trace Bad Bad Trace W-l-F Trace Trace Trace Bad Trace Bad None None None W-l-G Very bad Very bad Bad Bad Bad None Bad Bad None W-2-A Very bad Very bad None None Very bad Very bad Very bad None Bad Bad None None W-2-B Very bad None Very bad Bad Bad Bad Very bad Very bad None W-2-C Bad Bad Trace Medium Medium None Bad Trace None W-2-D . . Bad Bad Bad Bad Very bad Very bad Bad None Very bad Very bad None None W-2-E Very bad Very bad Very bad None Very bad Very bad None None Very bad Very bad Very bad None W-2-F Medium Medium Trace Bad Bad Bad Bad Trace Bad W-2-G Very bad Bad Very bad None Bad Trace Bad None Very bad None Very bad None None None None None None Bad Trace None Trace 468 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Second Preliminary Inspection, October 21, 1915 — Continued i Black Patches on Lot Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms X-l-A Very bad Very bad Bad None Very bad Trace None Very bad Very bad Very bad None None X-l-B Trace Trace None None Bad Bad None Trace Very bad Medium Very bad None X-l-C Trace Trace None Trace Bad Bad None Trace Bad Trace Bad Bad X-l-D . . Bad Bad None None Bad Bad None None Bad Bad None None X-l-E Bad Bad None None Medium Medium None None Bad Bad None None X-l-F Bad Bad None Bad Medium Medium None None Medium Medium None None X-l-G Very bad None Very bad Very bad Very bad Bad None Very bad Very bad None Very bad Trace X-3-A Medium None Medium None Bad Bad Medium None Bad Bad None Trace X-3-B Very bad Trace Very bad Very bad Bad Bad Trace Trace Bad Bad None None X-3-C Very bad Very bad Trace Very bad Medium Medium None None Bad Bad None None X-3-D Bad Bad None Bad Bad Trace None Bad Bad Bad None Trace X-3-E Medium Medium None None None None None None Bad Bad Trace None X-3-F Medium Medium Trace None Medium Medium Trace None Trace Trace Trace None X-3-G Very bad Medium Very bad Bad Very bad Very bad None Trace Very bad Very bad Trace None APPENDIX H 469 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Second Preliminary Inspection, October 21, 1915 — Continued , Black Patches on Lot Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms Y-l-A None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-B Very bad Medium Very bad None Very bad Very bad Bad None Very bad Very bad None None Y-l-C Bad Bad None None Bad Medium Trace Bad Bad None None Bad Y-l-D Bad Bad None None Bad Bad None None Bad Trace Bad Bad Y-l-E Bad None Bad None Very bad Very bad Trace None Bad Bad None None Y-l-F Bad Trace Bad None Very bad Very bad None None Bad None Bad Bad Y-l-G Bad None Bad Bad Trace Trace None None Very bad Medium Very bad Bad Y-4-A Bad Medium Bad None Bad Medium Bad Bad Very bad Very bad Bad None Y-4-B Very bad Very bad None None Bad None Bad None Trace Trace None None Y-4-C . Bad Bad ' Bad None Bad Bad Bad None Bad Bad Trace None Y-4-D Very bad Very bad None None None None None None Bad Bad None None Y-4-E Bad Bad None None Very bad Very bad Very bad None Very bad Bad Very bad None Y-4-F Bad - Bad None None Very bad Bad Very bad None Very bad Very bad Bad None Y-4-G Very bad Medium Very bad None Very bad Bad Very bad None Very bad Bad Very bad None 470 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Second Preliminary Inspection, October 21, 1915 — Continued None None None None Bad None , Black Patches on Lot Cans Bodies Tops Z-l-A None None None Very bad Very bad None Very bad Very bad None Z-l-B Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Z-l-C Verv bad Very bad Bad Bad None None Z-l-D... Bad Bad Very bad None Bad None Z-l-E Very bad Very bad Very bad Bad Bad Trace Z-l-F Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Z-8-G Medium None Bad Bad Trace None Bad Very bad Bad Bottoms None None None None None None None None None None None Very bad None Bad None None None None Bad None Bad None None None Medium None Bad None Trace None APPENDIX H 471 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot W-l-A. W-l-B. W-l-C. W-l-D Can Vacuum No. Inches .10 12 21 23 24 .20 21 22 .23 24 .10 11 12 22 23 .41 42 43 44 45 13 13 13 12 11 5 14 15 15 13 9 13 14 15 15 15 15 13 14 14 Cans Medium Bad None Medium Trace Medium Medium Bad Bad Bad Medium Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Trace Bad Bad Bad — Black Patches on Bodies Tops Medium None None Medium None Medium Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Trace Bad Very bad Bad None Bad None Trace Trace Bottoms None None None None None Medium None Medium None Bad None Bad None Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None None None None Bad None Bad Trace Trace Trace None Trace Black in Contents None None None Trace Trace None None Trace None Trace Trace None Trace None Trace Bad Medium Trace Bad Medium W-l-E 20 16 Bad Very bad None None None 21 14 Bad Very bad Very bad None None 22 14 Medium Medium Medium None None 23 13 Medium Medium None None Trace 24 13 Medium None Medium None Trace W-l-F. W-l-G. .19 20 22 23 24 W-2-A. W-2-B. .40 42 43 44 45 17 21 22 23 24 20 21 22 23 24 14 14 15 14 13 15 16 13 10 13 14 16 15 14 14 14 14 14 12 13 Trace Trace Trace Medium Trace Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Medium Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Trace Trace Trace None Trace Very bad Very bad None Trace Bad Bad Very bad Very bad Medium Very bad Very bad' Very bad Very bad Very bad Very bad Trace None None None Trace None None Very bad Very bad None None None Medium Trace Bad None None None Medium None None None None Medium Trace Bad None Medium None Very bad None None None None None None None None None None Bad Bad None None None None None Bad Trace Trace Trace None Medium None Very bad Medium Trace Medium Bad Medium 472 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Lot W-2-C. Can Vacuum No. Inches 17 18 21 22 23 15 15 15 15 15 Cans Bad Medium Bad Medium Bad — Black Patches on Bodies Tops Bad Bad Medium None Bad None Medium Medium None None Bottoms None None None Bad None Black in Contents Bad None None Very bad Very bad W-2-D .19 21 22 23 24 14 8 14 13 14 Medium Bad Bad Bad Bad Medium Very bad Bad Bad Bad Medium None Trace None Bad None None None None None Bad None None Very bad Trace W-2-E. 16 19 20 22 23 14 13 7 15 13 Medium Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Bad Bad Trace None None None None None None None None None Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium W-2-F 19 20 22 23 24 14 13 8 15 Medium Medium Bad Medium Trace Medium Medium Bad Medium Trace Medium None None None None None None None None None Bad None None Medium Bad W-2-G. 20 21 22 23 24 15 15 15 14 15 Bad Medium Bad Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None Bad None Very bad Medium None None Medium None None Bad Very bad Very bad Very bad X-l-A. 19 20 22 23 24 13 15 14 14 15 Bad Medium Medium Trace Medium Bad Medium Medium Trace Medium None Trace None None None None None None None Trace Medium None Medium None Medium X-l-B 19 20 22 23 24 13 14 14 15 13 Medium Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Very bad Bad Medium None None None None Medium Medium None None None None None Verjr bad Trace Bad None X-l-C. 18 19 21 22 23 13 14 14 14 14 Medium Medium Trace Medium None Medium Medium Trace Medium None None None None None None None None None None None Trace Trace None Trace None X-l-D 19 18 21 22 23 14 15 13 14 14 Medium Medium Medium Bad Trace Medium Medium Medium None Trace None None None Bad Trace None None None None None None Medium Bad Medium None APPENDIX H 473 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Lot X-l-E. Can Vacuum No. Inches .18 19 21 22 23 13 14 14 15 14 Cans Trace Bad Trace Trace Trace Black Patches on Tops None Bodies Trace Bad Trace Trace Trace None None None None Bottoms None None None None None Black in Contents Bad None None Medium None X-l-F. .18 19 21 22 23 16 15 13 16 14 None Trace Medium Trace Medium None None None Trace None None None Medium None Medium None Trace Trace None None None None Trace Medium None X-l-G .19 20 22 23 24 15 14 13 15 13 Trace Trace Medium Bad Bad None Trace Trace Trace None None None Medium Bad None Trace Trace Medium Trace Bad Trace None Medium Bad Medium X-3-A .20 21 22 23 24 14 12 13 14 13 Medium Medium Trace Bad Bad Trace Medium Trace Trace Bad Medium None None Bad Bad None None None None None Medium None None Bad None X-3-B . .19 20 22 23 24 14 13 15 14 13 None Trace Trace None None None Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None X-3-C 17 18 21 22 23 14 10 13 15 12 None Trace Trace None None None Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None Bad None None None X-3-D 20 21 22 23 24 13 13 14 13 14 Medium None Medium Medium Medium Trace None Medium Medium Medium None None None None None Medium None Medium Medium None None Trace None None Trace X-3- .19 20 22 23 24 12 14 12 13 14 None Medium None Medium None None None None Medium None None None None None None None Medium None None None None None None Very bad None X-3-F. .20 21 22 23 24 13 14 13 15 13 Trace Trace Trace None Trace Trace Trace Trace None Trace None None None None Trace None None None None None None None None None None 474 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Lot X-3-G. .20 21 22 23 24 14 14 15 15 14 Can Vacuum , No. Inches Cans Bad Bad Medium Trace Trace — Black Patches on Bodies Tops None Bad None Bad Medium None None Trace None Trace Bottoms Bad None Trace Trace None Black in Contents None None Trace Medium None Y-l-A. 19 21 22 23 24 13 14 11 14 13 Trace Bad Medium Trace Trace None None None None None None None Medium None None Trace Bad None Trace Trace None None None None None Y-l-B .18 19 22 23 24 13 13 15 14 14 Medium Trace Medium Medium Medium None Trace Medium Medium Medium Medium Trace None None Medium None None None None None None Trace Bad None None Y-l-C 18 19 20 22 24 14 13 12 12 13 None Medium Trace Trace None None Medium Trace Trace None None Medium None None None None None None None None None Trace None None None Y-l-D 17 21 22 23 24 13 15 14 15 14 None Bad Trace None None None Bad Trace Trace None None None Trace None None None None None None None None Trace None None None Y-l-E. .18 19 21 22 24 13 15 13 13 13 None Medium Medium Medium None None Trace Medium Trace None None Medium None Medium None None None Trace None None None None Trace None None Y-l-F 18 19 20 22 24 14 13 14 14 12 Bad Bad Medium Medium Trace Medium Bad Medium Medium Trace Bad None Medium None None Trace Trace Trace Trace None None Trace None None Trace Y-l-G 18 19 21 22 24 14 18 14 13 13 Bad Bad Bad Bad Medium Bad Trace None Medium None Trace Bad Medium Bad Medium None None None None Very bad Trace Bad Trace None None Y-4-A 17 14 None None None None None 18 15 Medium Medium None None None 21 14 Bad Medium Very bad None None 22 13 Bad Trace None Very bad None 23 14 Bad Trace Very bad None Medium APPENDIX H 475 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Lot Y-4-B Can Vaeuu^i No. Inches .18 19 22 23 24 14 14 13 14 13 Cans Medium Bad Bad Medium Medium — Black Patches on Bodies Tops Medium Medium Bad Medium None Medium None Trace Bad Medium Bottoms None None None None None Black in Contents Trace Very bad Trace None None Y-4-C 19 20 22 23 24 15 15 15 16 15 Medium Medium Bad Trace Trace Medium Medium Trace Trace Trace None None None None Very bad None None None Trace None None Medium Very bad Trace None Y-4-D 19 12 Bad Very bad None None Trace 21 14 None None None None None 22 15 Bad Bad Very bad None Trace 23 10 Medium ' Medium Medium Trace Trace 24 14 Bad Trace Bad None Trace Y-4-E. .20 15 Bad Medium 21 15 None None 22 15 Bad Bad 23 15 Medium Medium Medium 24 15 Bad Medium Bad Very bad None None None Bad None Trace None Bad None Medium Very bad None Y-4-F Y-4-G .18 19 20 22 23 18 19 20 23 24 15 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 12 15 Trace Medium Trace Bad Bad Medium None Bad Trace Trace Trace Medium Trace Medium Very bad Medium None None Trace Trace None Medium None Bad Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None Bad None None Bad None None None None None None None None None Z-l-A 19 20 22 23 24 14 16 13 15 16 Bad Bad Bad Medium Bad None Bad Bad Medium Bad Bad None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None None Z-l-B 19 20 22 23 24 13 14 15 13 12 Medium None None None None Trace None None None None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-C 20 21 22 23 24 14 14 14 14 14 Bad None None Bad Bad Bad None None Bad Medium Medium None None Very bad. Very bad None None None None None None None None Bad Medium 476 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 — Continued Lot Z-l-D Can "Vacuum No. Inches 19 20 22 23 24 14 13 14 13 9 Cans Medium Trace None Bad Medium — Black Patches on — Bodies Tops Medium Medium Trace Trace None Trace None None Bad Medium Bottoms None None None None None Black in Contents None None Medium Bad None Z-l-E .19 20 22 23 24 15 16 15 15 14 Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad None Medium Bad None Medium Very bad None Very bad None Bad None Very bad None Bad None Medium None Medium Trace Trace Z-l-F. . 19 15 Medium Medium Trace None None 20 15 Bad Medium Bad None None 22 15 Bad None Very bad None Bad 23 15 Medium Trace Medium None None 24 16 Bad Bad None None Bad Z-l-G 17 15 Bad Trace Bad None Bad 18 14 Bad Medium Very bad None Bad 21 14 Bad Bad Very bad None None 22 16 Bad Bad Very bad None Trace 23 15 Bad Very bad Medium None Trace APPENDIX H 477 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot V-l-A. Can Vacuum No. Inches . 9 11 17 19 20 12 13 13 13 13 Cans Bad Medium Medium None — Black Patches on ■ Bodies Tops Medium Medium Bottoms None None None Bad Medium Medium None None None Black in Contents None Contents None all free None from None discoloration None W-l-B. 13 14 17 18 19 13 14 14 13 13 None Trace Medium Trace None None Trace Medium Trace None . None None None None None None None None None None W-l-C. . 7 9 19 20 21 15 13 13 13 14 Medium Medium Trace Medium Bad Medium Medium Trace Medium Bad None None None None None None None None None None W-l-D .33 37 38 39 40 13 13 5 13 13 None Medium Medium Medium Trace None Medium Medium Medium Trace None None None None None None None None None None W-l-E. 12 16 17 18 19 13 12 11 12 4 Medium None Trace Trace Medium Medium None Trace Trace Medium None None None None None None None None None None W-l-F. 12 16 17 18 21 14 13 13 13 13 Medium Trace Trace Medium None Medium Trace Trace Medium None None None None None None None None None None None W-l-G. 30 34 38 39 41 13 13 13 13 14 Trace Medium Medium Medium None Trace Medium Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None None W-2-A. 9 13 18 19 20 14 14 13 4 14 Bad Bad Trace Trace Bad Bad Bad Trace Trace Bad None None None None None None Bad None None None W-2-B. 13 14 17 18 19 13 13 5 14 14 Medium Medium Bad Bad Bad Medium Medium Bad Bad Bad None None None None None None None None None None 478 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued V „„„, 1VV , BldClC Pi. t "" k1 "* *"*" "" Lot No. Inches Cans Bodies Tops ^ BlclClC in Bottoms Contents W-2-C 9 12 Bad Bad None None Contents 13 14 None None None None all free 14 15 None None None None from 19 14 Bad Bad None None discoloration 20 14 Bad Bad None None W-2-D 12 13 Medium Medium None None 16 13 Bad Bad None None 17 13 Medium Medium None None 18 13 Bad Bad None None 20 13 Trace Trace None None W-2-E 14 14 Trace Trace None None 15 14 Trace Trace None None 17 14 Medium Medium None None 18 14 Medium Medium None None 21 14 Bad Bad None None W-2-F 12 13 Bad Bad Note None 16 14 Medium Medium None None 17 13 Trace Trace None None 18 Medium Medium None None 21 14 Trace Trace None None W-2-G 15 14 Medium Medium None None 16 14. Trace Trace None None 17 14 Bad Bad None None 18 14 Medium Medium None None 19 14 Trace Trace None None X-l-A 12 15 Trace Trace None None 16 14 Medium Medium None None 17 14 Medium Medium None None 18 15 Trace Trace None None 21 14 Trace Trace None None X-l-B 12 14 Trace Trace None Trace 16 14 Trace Trace None None 17 3 None None None None 18 14 Medium Medium None None 21 Medium Medium None None X-l-C 14 14 None None None None 16 14 Trace Trace None None 17 15 Trace Trace None None 20 14 Trace Trace None None 24 15 Trace Trace None None X-l-D 12 15 Trace Trace None None 16 15 Bad Bad None None 19 15 Trace Trace None None 20 15 Medium Medium None None 24 15 Trace Trace None None APPENDIX H 479 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Lot X-l-E, Can Vacuum No. Inches .12 16 17 20 24 14 15 15 14 14 , Black Patches on Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms Medium Medium None None Trace Trace None None Trace Trace None None Trace Trace None None Trace Trace None None Black in Contents Contents all free from discoloration X-l-F. 12 14 Trace Trace None None 16 14 Medium Medium None None 17 14 Medium Medium None None 20 14 Trace Trace None None 24 14 Trace Trace None None X-l-G 12 16 17 18 21 15 14 5 14 13 Bad None Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None Bad None Bad None None X-3-A. 15 16 17 18 19 13 15 15 14 14 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None X-3-B 14 15 17 18 21 14 14 14 14 13 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None X-3-C. 12 16 19 20 24 15 14 15 12 15 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None X-3-D. 12 16 17 18 19 13 14 14 14 14 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None X-3-E. 10 14 17 18 21 13 13 13 5 13 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None X-3-F. 15 16 17 18 19 6 14 14 14 14 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Lot X-3-G. Can Vacuum No. Inches 9 16 17 18 19 15 15 14 14 14 ,. Black Patches on Cans Bodies Tops None None None None None None Bad None None Bad None None None None None Bottoms None None Bad Bad None Black in Contents Contents all free from discoloration Y-l-A 10 14 17 18 20 12 14 12 14 14 None None Trace Trace Trace None None Trace Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-B 12 15 16 17 20 12 14 13 14 14 None Trace None Trace None None Trace None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-C. 12 15 16 17 21 14 10 10 10 10 Trace Trace Trace None None Trace Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-D. .12 16 18 19 20 10 13 14 14 13 None None None Trace None None None None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-E. 11 14 15 17 20 13 15 14 15 14 Trace Trace Trace Tr^ce None Trace Trace Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-F 13 14 15 17 21 12 13 14 14 14 Trace None Trace Trace Trace Trace None Trace Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-G , 9 13 14 17 20 14 14 14 14 14 Trace Trace Trace None Trace Trace Trace Trace None Trace None None None None None None None None None None Y-4-A 10 14 19 20 24 14 14 14 14 14 None None None Trace Trace None None None Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None APPENDIX H 481 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Lot Y-4-B Can Vacuum , No. Inches Cans .12 16 17 20 21 14 14 14 13 13 Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace — Black Patches on Bodies Tops Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace None None None None None Bottoms None None None None None Black in Contents Contents all free from discoloration Y-4-C. 9 13 17 18 21 14 14 15 15 15 Trace Medium Medium Bad Trace Trace Medium Medium Bad Trace None None None None None None None None None None Y-4-D. 11 15 17 18 20 15 14 5 14 14 Medium Medium Medium Medium Trace Medium Medium Medium Medium Trace None None None None None None None None None None Y-4-E. , 9 13 17 18 19 14 14 14 15 4 Trace Medium Medium Trace Bad Trace Medium Medium Trace Bad None None None None None None None None None None Y-4-F 9 13 14 17 21 14 13 13 4 14 Medium None Trace Trace Medium Medium None Trace Trace Medium None None None None None None None None None None Y-4-G 15 16 17 21 22 14 15 15 15 14 Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-A 10 14 17 18 21 14 5 14 14 15 None None Trace Trace None None None Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-B 10 14 17 18 21 14 14 15 15 15 Trace None None Medium None Trace None None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-C 10 14 17 18 19 15 15 14 15 15 Trace None Medium None Trace Trace None Medium None Trace None None None None None None None None None None 482 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 — Continued Lot Z-l-D Can Vacuum No. Inches 12 16 17 18 21 13 14 13 13 14 Cans None Medium Medium Medium Trace — ■ Black Patches on Bodies Tops None None Medium None Medium None Medium None Trace None Bottoms None None None None None Black in Contents Contents all free from discoloration Z-l-E Z-l-F. 15 16 17 18 21 .12 15 16 18 21 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 6 14 15 Bad Trace Trace None Bad Trace Trace Trace Medium Medium Bad Trace Trace None Bad Trace Trace Trace Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-G 11 12 Trace Trace None None 15 14 Medium Medium None None 19 15 Trace Trace None None 20 15 Trace Trace None None 24 15 None None None None APPENDIX H 483 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Can No. Plnplr p n + rt V,^r. ^*-, Lot V aCUlim Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms -fc>lacK in Contents W-l-A. . . ...5 14 Medium Medium None None Bad 6 14 Bad Bad None None None 7 15 None None None None None 8 15 Medium Medium None None None 18 15 Trace Trace None None None W-l-B 9 15 Medium Medium None None None 10 15 Trace Trace None None None 11 15 None None None None None 12 15 Bad Bad ' None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None Trace W-l-C. 5 14 Medium Medium None None None 6 14 Bad Bad None None None 8 16 Medium ' Medium None None None 17 15 Medium Medium None None None 18 15 Medium Medium None None None W-l-D 6 16 None None None None None 23 15 Bad Bad None None None 24 15 Medium Medium None None None 25 13 Medium Medium None None None 26 15 Medium Medium None None None W-l-E 10 14 . Medium Medium None None None 11 14 Medium Medium None None None 13 13 Trace Trace None None None 14 14 Medium Medium None None None 15 13 None None None None None W-l-F 6 15 Bad Bad None None None 10 15 Medium Medium None None None 11 14 Medium Medium None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None None W-l-G 31 15 Bad Bad None None None 32 16 Medium Medium None None None 35 13 Trace Trace None None Trace 36 16 Bad Bad None None None 37 16 Medium Medium None None None W-2-A 10 16 Bad Bad None None Trace 11 14 Medium Medium None None None 14 14 Trace Trace None None None 15 15 Bad Bad None None None 16 15 Trace Trace None None None W-2-B 6 15 Bad Bad None None None 11 15 Bad Bad None None None 12 16 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None None 16 15 Trace Trace None None Bad 484 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Can Bl*~lClt pn + n^n« *-»-*■* Lot No. v^cuu m Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms -tSlELCtC in Contents W-2-C 10 15 Medium Medium None None None 11 16 Bad Bad None None None 12 14 Medium Medium None Medium None 15 7 Bad Bad None None None 16 15 Medium Medium None None None W-2-D 10 15 Medium Medium None None None 11 15 Medium Medium None None None 13 14 Bad Bad None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 Bad Bad None None None W-2-E 4 11 None None None None None 6 14 Bad Bad None None None 8 14 Medium Medium None None None 10 14 Bad Bad None None None 11 14 Medium Medium None None None W-2-F 10 14 Medium Medium None None None 11 14 Trace Trace None None None 12 13 Medium Medium None None None 14 13 Medium Medium None None None 15 14 Bad Bad None None None W-2-G 8 15 Medium Medium None None None 10 15 Trace Trace None None None 11 15 Medium Medium None None None 12 13 Medium Medium None None None 14 15 Trace Trace None None None X-l-A 10 16 Trace Trace None None None 11 15 Medium Medium None None Bad 13 16 Medium Medium None None . Medium 14 14 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 Medium Medium None None Bad X-l-B 10 15 Medium Medium None None None 11 15 None None None None None 13 15 Trace Trace None None Bad 14 15 Medium Medium None None Trace 15 15 Bad Bad None None None X-l-C 9 15 Trace Trace None None None 10 13 Trace Trace None None None 11 14 Medium Medium None None None 13 15 Bad Bad None None None 15 3 Medium Medium None None None X-l-D... ...10 14 Trace Trace None None None 11 16 Bad Bad None None None 13 13 Bad Bad None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None None None 15 15 None None None None None APPENDIX H 485 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Lot X-l-E. Can Vacuum No. Inches 10 11 13 14 15 15 15 14 15 15 , Black Patches on N Black in Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms Contents Medium Medium None None Trace Trace Trace None None None Medium Medium None None None None None None None None Medium Medium None None None X-l-F. 10 11 13 14 15 13 15 14 14 15 Medium Medium Trace Trace Trace Medium Medium Trace Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None X-l-G 10 11 13 14 15 13 15 15 16 15 Trace Medium Bad Trace Trace Trace Medium TBad Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None Trace None None None Trace X-3-A 9 10 11 13 14 15 10 15 15 12 Medium None None Trace None Medium None None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None X-3-B. 10 11 12 16 15 15 14 15 14 Medium None None None Medium Medium None None None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None X-3-C. 9 10 13 14 15 14 15 14 5 14 Medium None None Medium Trace Medium None None Medium Trace None None None None None None None None None None Medium None None None None X-3-D. 10 11 13 14 15 15 15 14 14 14 Medium None Trace Medium Medium Medium None Trace Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Medium X-3-E. 11 12 13 15 16 12 12 14 13 12 Trace Medium None None Medium Trace Medium None None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None X-3-F. 7 10 11 13 14 14 15 14 10 14 None Trace Medium Trace Medium None Trace Medium Trace Medium ' None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None 486 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Lot X-3-G. Can "Vacuum No. Inches 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 15 13 14 Cans Medium Trace None Trace Medium — Black Patches on Bodies Tops Trace Trace None Trace None None None None Medium None Bottoms Medium None None None None Black in Contents None None None None None Y-l-A. 11 12 13 15 16 16 13 14 14 15 None Trace Trace None Medium None Trace Trace None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-B 10 11 13 14 21 15 12 15 15 12 Trace Trace None Medium Medium Trace Trace None Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None Trace None None None None None Y-l-C. 9 10 11 13 14 3 14 14 5 1 Trace None None Trace Medium Trace None None Trace Medium None None None None None None None None Trace Medium None None None None Trace Y-l-D 7 10 11 14 15 15 12 10 4 15 Medium None Trace Medium Trace Medium None Trace Medium Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None Y-l-E. 9 10 12 13 16 1 4 15 15. 15 Medium None Trace None None Medium None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None None None Y-l-F 16 6 9 10 11 15 14 15 14 11 Medium None Medium Trace Trace Medium None Medium Trace Trace None None None None None Trace None None Trace Trace None None None None None Y-l-G. 10 11 12 15 16 16 15 14 15 14 Medium None Bad Trace Trace Medium None Bad None Trace None None None None None Trace Trace Trace Trace None None None None None None Y-4-A. 11 12 13 15 16 15 3 14 15 15 Trace Medium Medium Trace Medium Trace None Medium Trace Medium None Medium None None None None None None None None Trace Trace None None None APPENDIX H 487 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Lot Y-4-B Can Vacuum No. Inches 10 11 13 14 15 14 14 15 15 15 Cans Bad Medium Trace Bad None — Black Patches on • Bodies Tops Bad Medium Trace Bad None None None None None None Bottoms None None None None None Black in Contents Trace None None None None Y-4-C 10 11 14 15 15 15 16 15 15 15 None Medium Bad Medium Bad None Medium Bad Medium Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None None Y-4-D 10 12 13 14 16 16 14 15 6 Trace Medium Medium Medium Bad Trace Medium Medium Trace Bad None None None Medium None None None None None None None Bad None None None Y-4-E. 10 11 14 15 16 16 16 16 3 16 Bad Bad Bad Bad Medium Bad Bad Bad Bad Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None Y-4-F 10 11 12 15 18 15 12 15 15 15 Trace Trace Trace None Trace Trace Trace Trace None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-4-G Z-l-A 10 11 12 13 14 11 12 13 15 16 15 15 15 15 14 14 15 14 16 16 Bad Medium Medium Medium Bad Trace Trace None None Bad Bad Medium Medium Medium Bad Trace Trace None None Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-B 9 11 13 15 16 14 14 14 14 13 None None Trace None Trace None None Trace None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None Very bad None None Z-l-C 11 12 13 15 16 12 3 15 14 15 None None None Medium Medium None None None Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None None Medium None None None APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 — Continued Lot Z-l-D Can Vacuum , No. Inches Cans Black Patches on ■ — ■ — ,, Black in Bodies ' Tops Bottoms Contents 7 15 Medium Medium None None Medium 10 16 None None None None None 11 16 None None None None None 14 15 Medium Medium None None Medium 15 15 None None None None None Z-l-E 7 8 11 12 14 15 15 16 15 15 Trace None None None None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-F 9 10 11 13 17 16 16 15 14 16 None Medium None Medium None None Medium None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Medium Z-l-G 10 12 13 14 16 16 15 16 16 14 None Trace None Medium Medium None Trace None Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Trace APPENDIX H 489 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 Lot W-l-A. Can "Vacuum , No. Inches Cans 3 14 15 16 4 13 13 13 13 13 Trace Medium Trace Bad None — Black Patches on Bodies Tops Trace None Medium None Trace None Bad None None None Bottoms None None None None None Black in Contents Bad None None None None W-l-B. 4 6 7 8 16 14 12 14 12 13 Bad None Trace Trace Bad Bad None Trace Trace Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None Bad None Bad W-l-C. 4 13 14 15 16 13 13 15 15 15 Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None W-l-D 26 27 28 29 30 13 15 13 15 14 Trace Bad Trace Trace Medium Trace Bad Trace Trace Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None W-l-E. 14 14 13 12 14 Medium Medium Bad Trace Bad Medium Medium Bad Trace Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None None Bad None W-l-F. 5 7 8 9 13 13 14 15 14 15 Medium Bad Trace None Medium Medium Bad Trace None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None W-l-G. .24 15 Medium Medium None None None 26 15 Bad Bad None None None 27 15 Trace Trace None None None 28 14 Medium Medium None None None 29 13 Trace Trace None None None W-2-A. W-2-B. 5 6 7 8 12 5 7 8 9 10 14 Very bad Very bad None None None 14 Medium Medium None None None 14 Very bad Very bad None None None 14 Very bad Very bad None None None 14 Very bad Very bad None None None 14 3 14 15 14 Medium Medium - None Bad Bad None Bad Bad None None None None Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None Bad 490 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Kluclc Pcl + r> ^ n '"*" '■'" "R1 a cAz i n Lot No. V3.CUU 111 Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms -DlcLCiv 111 Contents W-2-C. 2 18 None None None None None 5 14 Very bad Very bad None None None 6 14 Medium Medium None None None 7 15 Medium Medium None None None 8 13 None None None None None W-2-D.. ...5 14 Very bad Verv bad None None None 6 14 Bad Bad None None None 7 13 Trace Trace None None None 8 13 Bad Bad None None None 9 13 Medium Medium None None None W-2-E 5 14 Medium Medium None None None " 6 13 Bad Bad None None Bad 7 13 Very bad Very bad None None Bad 9 12 Bad Bad None None Bad 13 14 Medium Medium None None Bad W-2-F 5 14 Medium Medium None None None 7 12 Medium Medium None None None 8 15 Bad Bad None None None 9 13 Bad Bad None None Bad 13 13 None None None None None W-2-G 5 14 Trace Trace None None Bad 6 15 Medium Medium None None None 7 13 Trace Trace None None None 9 3 None None None None None 13 13 Medium Medium None None None X-l-A 5 14 Bad Bad None None None 7 15 Medium Medium None None None 8 14 Bad Bad None None Trace 9 10 Medium Medium None None Trace 3 13 Trace Trace None None Trace X-l-B 5 13 None None None None None 6 13 Trace Trace None None None 7 13 Bad Bad None None Trace 8 13 Medium Medium None None None 9 13 Medium Medium None None None X-l-C 5 13 Bad Bad None None None 6 14 None None None None None 7 14 Trace Trace None None Trace 8 13 Medium Medium None None None • 12 13 Medium Medium None None None X-l-D 3 14 None None None None None 5 13 Medium Medium None None None 7 12 Medium Medium None None None 8 15 Medium Medium None None None 9 14 Medium Medium None None None APPENDIX H 491 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued „„„,„,„ ]Bl*\Cl*- pn+ntinr. n ■»-* . Lot No. Inches r Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms -t>i£LClv in Contents X-l-E 5 13 Bad Bad None None None 6 15 Trace Trace None None Medium 7 13 Bad Bad None None None 8 13 Trace Trace None None None 9 13 Trace Trace None None None X-l-F 4 13 Medium Medium None None None 5 13 Medium Medium None None None 6 13 Medium Medium None None None 7 13 Bad Bad . None None None 8 14 Medium Medium None None None X-l-G 5 13 None None None None None 6 14 None None None None None 7 14 None 'None None None None 8 15 None None None None None 9 13 Trace Trace None None None X-3-A . , 5 13 None None None None None 6 13 Medium Medium None None None 7 13 Medium Medium None None None 8 9 None None None None None 12 13 None None None None None X-3-B 5 13 None None None None None 6 11 None None None None None 7 13 None None None None None 8 2 Trace Trace None None None 13 13 Trace Trace None None None X-3-C 5 13 None None None None None 6 14 None None None None None 7 13 None None None None None 8 13 Trace Trace None None Medium 11 13 None None None None None X-3-D.. 2 13 Trace Trace None None None 5 14 Trace Trace None None None 6 13 Medium Medium None None None 7 3 None None None None None 8 13 None None None None None X-3-E 5 12 None None None None None 6 12 None None None None None 7 11 Trace Trace None None None 8 13 None None None None None 9 13 Trace Trace None None None X-3-F 5 13 None None ► None None None 6 13 None None None None None 8 12 Trace Trace None None None 9 13 None None None None None 12 13 None None None None None 492 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Lot X-3-G. Can Vacuum No. Inches 5 6 7 8 10 5 13 13 13 14 Cans None None Medium Trace None — Black Patches on Bodies Tops None None Medium Trace None None None None None None Bottoms None None None None None Black in Contents None None None None None Y-l-A. 13 13 13 13 14 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-B 13 15 14 14 14 None None Bad None None None None Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-C. 14 14 12 13 13 None None None None Trace None None None None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None Y-l-D. 5 6 8 9 13 14 13 13 13 13 None None Trace Trace None None None Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-E. 13 14 14 13 13 Medium None Trace Trace None Medium None Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-F 1 5 7 8 12 13 12 12 12 13 Trace None Medium None Trace Trace None Medium None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None Medium None None None Y-l-G 13 14 14 13 13 None Trace Trace None Trace None Trace Trace None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-4-A 14 13 12 12 13 None Trace None None None None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None APPENDIX H 493 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Lot Y-4-B. Can Vacuum No. Inches 21 12 12 13 13 Cans Bad Bad None None Trace — Black Patches on • Bodies Tops Bad Bad None None Trace None None None None None Bottoms None None None None None Black in Contents None None None None None Y-4-C, 5 6 7 8 12 14 14 13 14 15 None Trace Medium Trace None None None Trace None Medium None Trace . • None None None None None None None None Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Y-4-D 14 14 14 12 12 Trace Medium Trace None Trace Trace ,Medium Trace None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-4-E. 5 6 7 8 12 12 7 14 14 11 Bad Trace Bad None Medium Bad Trace Bad None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-4-F 14 14 14 8 15 Bad Medium Medium Bad Bad Bad Medium Medium Bad Bad None None None None None None None None None None Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Y-4-G 15 15 15 15 12 Medium None None None Medium Medium None None None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None Medium None None Z-l-A 14 14 15 14 13 None Medium None Trace None None Medium None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-B 5 6 7 8 12 13 14 14 4 15 Medium Medium Trace Medium Trace Medium Medium Trace Medium Trace None None None None None None None None None None None Medium Medium Medium Medium Z-l-C 13 14 15 14 3 Trace Medium None Medium None Trace Medium None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None 494 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 — Continued Ctin IBllXClt Tp*y "*" rtl "' rt ^ *^"*"« Lot No. V cLCiium Inches r Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms JjicLCit in Contents Z-l-D 5 14 None None None None None 6 13 Medium Medium None None None 8 13 Trace Trace None None None 9 12 Medium Medium None None None 13 12 None None None None None Z-l-E 5 13 None None None None Medium 6 16 None None None None None 9 13 Medium Medium None None None 10 13 None None None None None 13 14 None None None None None Z-l-F 5 5 Trace Trace None None None 6 13 Bad Bad None None None 7 13 Bad Bad None None None 8 14 Trace Trace None None None 14 14 Bad Bad None None None Z-l-G 5 14 Medium Medium None None None 6 15 None None None None None 7 14 Very bad Very bad None Bad None 8 14 Bad Bad None Bad None 9 15 None None None None None APPENDIX H 495 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 Can n No. 1 2 Vacuum Inches 12 14 Cans None Medium Black Pa Bodies None Medium Black in Contents None None Lot W-l-A. Tops None None Bottoms None None W-l-B 1 2 3 13 13 15 Bad Medium None Bad Medium None None None None None None None None None None W-l-C. 2 3 15 15 Medium Bad Medium Bad None None None None None None W-l-D . . .. 23 24 25 13 4 15 Bad Bad Medium Bad Bad Medium None None None Bad Medium None None None None W-l-E 1 2 4 12 14 14 Medium Bad Medium Medium Bad Medium None None None None None None None None None W-l-F 1 2 4 12 3 14 Medium Trace Medium Medium Trace Medium None None None None None None None None None W-l-G 22 23 12 14 Medium Bad Medium Bad None None None ' None None None W-2-A 1 2 3 4 15 14 15 14 Medium Bad Very Bad Bad Medium Bad Very bad Bad None None None None None None None None None None None Trace W-2-B 1 2 3 4 14 3 14 15 Bad Medium Bad None Bad Trace Bad None Medium None None None None Medium None None None None None None W-2-C 1 3 4 15 14 14 None Bad Medium None Bad Medium None None None None None None None Trace Trace W-2-D . . .. 1 2 3 4 14 11 13 14 Medium Bad Medium Bad Medium Bad Medium Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None W-2-E 1 2 3 14 13 14 Bad Medium Medium Bad Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None W-2-F 1 2 3 4 11 12 15 11 None Medium Bad Bad None Medium Bad Bad None None None None None None None None Trace None None None 496 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Lot W-2-G. Can Vacuum No. Inches . 1 15 2 15 3 14 4 14 Cans None None None Medium — Black Patches on Bodies Tops None None None None None None Medium None Bottoms None None None None Black in Contents Trace Trace None None X-l-A 12 None 11 Medium 11 Bad 13 None None Medium Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None Bad X-l-B 13 Bad 12 Medium 13 Bad 14 Bad Bad Medium Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None None X-l-C 14 None None 14 Medium 14 Bad None None Medium Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None X-l-D. 14 Medium 14 Trace 13 Trace 14 Trace Medium Trace Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None X-l-E. 14 Medium 14 Trace 14 . Trace 14 Medium Medium Trace Trace Medium None None None None None None None None None None None Trace X-l-F. 12 Medium 12 Trace 12 Medium Medium Trace Medium None None None None None None None None None X-l-G 14 Trace 14 Trace 13 Trace 13 Medium Trace Trace Trace Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None X-3-A. 13 None 13 None 13 None 13 Trace None None None Trace None None None None None None None None None Trace Trace Trace X-3-B 5 None 12 Trace 13 None 12 Medium None Trace None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None Medium X-3-C . 14 Trace 13 None 13 None 13 None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None APPENDIX H 497 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Lot X-3-D Can "Vacuum , Black Patches on > Black in No. Inches Cans Bodies Tops Bottoms Contents . . 1 15 None None None None None 2 11 None None None None None 3 12 None None None None Bad 4 11 None None None None Trace X-3-E 13 Trace 13 Trace 11 Trace Trace Trace Trace None None None None None None None None None X-3-F. 13 None 12 None None 12 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Trace Trace X-3-G. 14 None 13 Trace 13 None 14 None None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-A. 12 None 8 None None 13 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-l-B. 15 Medium 13 None 14 Trace 13 None Medium None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None Bad Y-l-C. 14 Trace 15 Medium 11 Bad Trace Medium Bad None None None ■ None None None None None None Y-l-D. 14 None 15 None 2 None 12 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Bad None None Y-4-E 2 3 4 Y-l-F 2 3 4 Y-l-G 1 2 4 12 Trace 12 Medium 15 None 12 Medium 14 Trace 13 Trace 13 13 13 Trace Medium Trace Trace Medium None Medium Trace Trace Trace Medium Trace None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Trace None None None None 498 APPENDIX PI INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Lot Y-4-A. Can Vacuum , No. Inches Cans Black Patches on ,, Black in Bodies Tops Bottoms Contents 1 11 None None None None None 2 13 Trace Trace Trace None None 3 12 Trace None Trace None None 4 12 None None None None None Y-4-B 1 12 Bad Bad None None Trace 2 15 None None None None None 3 11 Bad Bad None None None 4 15 Medium Medium None None None Y-4-C. 15 Trace 2 Medium 3 Medium 11 None Trace None Medium None Medium None None None None None Medium None None None None None Y-4-D. 14 Medium 15 None 15 None 14 Medium Medium None None Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-4-E. 14 Medium 2 None 14 Trace 15 Bad Medium None Trace Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None Y-4-F 14 Medium 14 Bad 14 Medium Medium Bad Medium None None None None None None None None None Y-4-G. 14 Trace 15 Trace 14 None 15 Bad Trace Trace None Bad None None None Trace None None None None None Medium None None Z-l-A 12 None 10 None 12 None 14 None None None None None Trace None None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-B 12 Trace 15 None 15 Trace 13 None Trace None Trace None None None None None None None None None Bad None None None Z-l-C 13 None 14 Bad 14 Medium 15 Medium None Bad Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-D 14 None 13 None 15 None 14 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None APPENDIX H 499 INSPECTION DATA— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 — Continued Can No. Vacuum Inches Cans Black Patches on — Bodies Tops . Lot Bottoms Contents Z-l-E 1 2 3 4 15 13 15 5 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Bad None Z-l-F 1 2 3 4 14 14 15 15 None Bad Medium Medium None Bad Medium Medium None None None None None None None None None None None None Z-l-G 1 2 3 4 14 15 14 Trace Trace None Bad Trace Trace None Bad None None None None None None None None None None None None 500 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— CONDENSED MILK* First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Two cans of each lot were inspected. All cans appeared absolutely new and bright. Most of the cans had no vacuum at all. CONDENSED MILK— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Two cans of each lot were inspected. All cans appeared normal. *Condensed milk was not inspected at all Washington inspections. APPENDIX H 501 INSPECTION DATA— CONDENSED MILK— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can Number 5 Vacuum Inches 7 W-l-B 6 5 7 6 W-l-C 6 5 6 W-l-D 6 5 7 6 W-l-E 6 5 6 7 W-l-F 6 5 8 3 W-l-G 6 5 6 7 W-2-A 6 5 6 1 W-2-B 6 5 W-2-C 6 5 1 W-2-D 6 5 6 W-2-E 6 5 4 W-2-F 6 3 W-2-G 5 7 X-l-A 6 5 6 6 X-l-B 6 5 7 X-l-C 6 5 X-l-D 6 5 2 6 X-l-E 6 5 4 7 X-l-F 6 5 8 3 X-l-G 6 5 3 X-3-A 6 5 o X-3-B 6 . . . . 5 2 2 X-3-C 6 5 7 X-3-D 6 5 3 5 6 4 Can Lot Number X-3-E 5 6 X-3-F 5 6 X-3-G 5 6 Y-l-A 5 6 Y-l-B 5 6 Y-l-C 5 6 Y-l-D 5 6 Y-l-E 5 6 Y-l-F 5 6 Y-l-G 5 6 Y-4-A 5 6 Y-4-B 5 6 Y-4-C 5 6 Y-4-D 5 6 Y-4-E 5 6 Y-4-F 5 6 Y-4-G 5 6 Z-l-A • 5 6 Z-l-B 5 6 Z-l-C 5 6 Z-l-D 5 6 Z-l-E 5 6 Z-l-F 5 6 Z-l-G 5 6 Vacuum Inches 3 5 5 502 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— CONDENSED MILK— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 7 8 W-2-B 7 8 W-l-C 7 8 W-l-D 7 8 W-l-E 7 8 W-l-F 7 8 W-l-G 7 8 W-2-A 7 8 W-2-B "7 8 W-2-C 7 8 W-2-D 7 8 W-2-E 7 8 W-2-F 7 8 W-2-G 7 8 X-l-A 7 8 X-l-B 7 8 X-l-C 7 8 X-l-D 7 8 X-l-E 7 8 X-l-F 7 8 X-l-G 7 8 X-3-A 7 8 X-3-B 7 8 X-3-C 7 8 X-3-D 7 Vacuum Inches 1 Lot X-3-E Can Number 7 Vacuum Inches s X-3-F 8 7 s s X-3-G 8 7 s 2 3 Y-l-A 8 ..... 7 2 s 3 4 Y-l-B 8 7 s s S s Y-l-C 8 7 s s 3 4 Y-l-D 8 7 s S , Y-l-E 8 7 1 s S s Y-l-F 8 7 s s Y-l-G 8 7 3 s s 3 Y-4-A 8 7 s 3 s s Y-4-B 8 7 4 s s s Y-4-C 8 , 7 S 1 1 Y-4-D 8 7 s i Y-4-E 8 7 s 2 Y-4-F 8 7 s s s s Y-4-G 8 7 L Z-l-A 8 7 s 3 Z-l-B 8 7 S s Z-l-C • 8 7 3 s Z-l-D 8 7 3 Z-l-E 8 7 o O s s s Z-l-F 8 7 s s s s Z-l-G 8 7 s s s s 8 S indicates overfilled. APPENDIX H 503 INSPECTION DATA— CONDENSED MILK— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 Can Vacuum Lot Number Inches W-l-A 9 2 W-l-B 9 W-l-C 9 4 W-l-D 9 W-l-E 9 W-l-F 9 W-l-G 9 W-2-A 9 W-2-B 9 W-2-C 9 W-2-D 9 W-2-E 9 W-2-F 9 W-2-G 9 X-l-A 9 X-l-B 9 X-l-C 9 X-l-D 9 3 X-l-E 9 2 X-l-F 9 X-l-G 9 X-3-A 9 X-3-B 9 X-3-C 9 X-3-D 9 Lot X-3-E Can Number 9 Vacuum Inches X-3-F 9 X-3-G 9 Y-l-A 9 Y-l-B 9 Y-l-C 9 Y-l-D 9 Y-l-E 9 Y-l-F 9 Y-l-G 9 Y-4-A 9 1 Y-4-B 9 Y-4-C 9 Y-4-D 9 Y-4-E 9 Y-4-F 9 Y-4-G 9 Z-l-A 9 Z-l-B 9 4 Z-l-C 9 Z-l-D Z-l-E 9 9 4 Z-l-F 9 Z-l-G 9 504 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— CONDENSED MILK— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 Can Vacuum Can Vacuum Lot Number Inches Lot Number Inches W-l-F 10 W-l-G 10 :j W-2-F 10 W-2-G 10 1 X-l-F 10 1 X-l-G 10 X-3-F 10 1 X-3-G 10 1- Y-l-F 10 6 Y-l-G 10 u Y-4-F 10 1 Y-4-G 10 <> Z-l-F 10 2 Z-l-G 10 APPENDIX H 505 INSPECTION DATA— EVAPORATED MILK First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot W-l-A W-l-B W-l-C W-l-D W-l-E W-l-F W-l-G W-2-A W-2-B W-2-C W-2-D W-2-E W-2-F W-2-G X-l-A X-l-B X-l-C X-l-D Can Number 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 o 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 X-l-E 1 2 X-l-F 1 2 X-l-G 1 X-3-A 1 Vacuum Inches G 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 G G 6 6 • G 6 6 G 5 6 6 6 6 G 6 G G G G G X-3-B 1 2 X-3-C 1 2 X-3-D 1 2 Lot X-3-E X-3-F X-3-G Y-l-A Y-l-B Y-l-C Y-l-D Y-l-E Y-l-F Y-l-G Y-4-A Y-4-B Y-4-C Y-4-D Y-4-E Y-4-F Y-4-G Z-l-A Z-l-B Z-l-C Z-l-D Z-l-E Z-l-F Z-l-G Can Vacuum Number Inches 1 5 2 G 1 G 2 5 1 G 2 o 1 5 i\> 5 1 G 2 r, 1 5 2 5 j 5 2 G 1 5 2 G 1 5 2 6 1 5 2 5 1 5 2 5 1 A 2 5 1 G 2 5 1 5 2 1 G 2 G 1 6 2 G '4 5 i G p # G 1 G 2 G 1 G 2 G i^ 5 g G 1 5 2 5 i. G 2 6 506 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— EVAPORATED MILK— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 3 4 W-l-B 3 t W-l-C 3 4 W-l-D 3 4 W-l-E 3 4 W-l-F 3 4 W-l-G 3 4 W-2-A 3 W-2-B 3 4 W-2-C 3 4 W-2-D 3 4 W-2-E 3 4 W-2-F 3 ■± W-2-G '? 4 X-l-A 3 4. X-l-B 3 4 X-l-C 3 4 X-l-D 3 .1 X-l-E 3 4 X-l-F 3 4 X-l-G 4 X-3-A -6 4 X-3-B 3 4 X-3-C 3 4 X-3-D a 4 Vacuum Inches 4 Lot X-3-E Can Number 3 Vacuum Inches 6 4 5 X-3-F 4 6 5 5 X-3-G 4 3 6 rv 5 5 5 Y-l-A 3 6 6 7 6 Y-l-B ■* 5 5 G 6 Y-l-C A 1 1 6 5 5 Y-l-D . 4 3 G 5 5 it 5 Y-l-E Y-l-F 4 3 4 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 Y-l-G 3 5 5 6 5 5 Y-4-A 4 3 6 3 6 6 Y-4-B 4 15 5 5 6 6 Y-4-C 4 •< o 5 6 6 Y-4-D 3 5 6 .5 Y-4-E 4 3 5 5 5 Y-4-F 3 5 G 5 Y-4-G I 5 4 5 5 4 Z-l-A 4 3 5 5 3 Z-l-B ..... 4 o 5 5 5 4 Z-l-C 4 5 5 5 G Z-l-D 4 3 5 5 G Z-l-E A. 3 6 5 5 Z-l-F 4 3 5 6 5 6 Z-l-G 4 a 5 5 5 4 5 APPENDIX H 507 INSPECTION DATA— EVAPORATED MILK— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 Can Lot Number W-l-A 5 G W-l-B 3 W-l-C 5 6 W-l-D 5 6 W-l-E 5 6 W-l-F 5 W-l-G 5 6 W-2-A 5 6 W-2-B 5 6 W-2-C 5 G W-2-D 5 G W-2-E 5 6 W-2-F 5 G W-2-G 5 o X-l-A b 6 X-l-B 5 b X-l-C 5 G X-l-D 5 G X-l-E 5 f X-l-F 5 6 X-l-G b C X-3-A o 6 X-3-B 5 6 X-3-C 5 6 X-3-D 5 Vacuum Inches 6 Lot X-3-E Can Number 5 Vacuum Inches 6 6 X-3-F o 7 3 IV X-3-G G 5 G 6 Y-l-A 6 5 6 6 g Y-l-B 6 o 7 7 Y-l-C G 5 7 4 Y-l-D e 5 7 7 7 Y-l-E 6 5 7 7 7 Y-l-F 6 6 3 7 6 Y-l-G 6 5 G 6 7 IV 6 Y-4-A 6 5 IV 6 6* 6 Y-4-B 6 5 6 6 6 7 Y-4-C 6 5 6 6 7 IV Y-4-D 6 5 6 6 Y-4-E 6 5 6 6 7 G Y-4-F 6 5 7 6 '3 5 Y-4-G 6 5 6 6 5 6 6 7 Z-l-A Z-l-B 6 5 6 5 6 4 5 5 IV 1 7 Z-l-C 6 5 5 6 IV Z-l-D 6 5 6 5 f. Z-l-E 6 5 4 4 6 '3 Z-l-F 6 5 4 5 7 7 Z-l-G 6 5 4 4 7 6 5 508 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— EVAPORATED MILK— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 Lot W 1-A Can Number 1 Vacuum Inches 2 3 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 6 6 5 4 4 3 5 6 6 5 5 3 4 5 6 5 4 4 4 3 4 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 6 5 5 6 6 5 Can Lot Number X-3-E 1 Vacuum Inches 5 W-l-B 2 1 2 X-3-F 1 5 5 W 1-C 2 1 2 X-3-G 1 6 5 W-l-D . 2 1 2 Y-l-A 1 2 Y-l-B 1 5 W 1-E . 2 1 5 5 2 1 5 W-l F 2 Y-l-C 1 4 2 1 5 W-l- G . 2 Y-l-D 1 4 2 1 4 W 3-A 2 . Y-l-E 1 5 4 VV-3-B 2 1 2 Y-l-F 1 4 5 W-2-C 2 1 2 Y-l-G 1 5 4 W-2-D . 2 1 2 Y-4-A 1 4 2 1 5 W-2-E . 2 Y-4-B 1 4 2 1 2 1 4 W-2-F 3 Y-4-C 1 4 4 W-2-G . 3 Y-4-D 1 4 2 1 2 1 5 X-l-A . . 3 Y-4-E 1 5 5 X-l-B . . 2 Y-4-F 1 4 5 X-l-C . . 2 1 2 Y-4-G 1 6 4 X-l-D . . 2 1 2 Z-l-A 1 4 2 1 5 X-l-E .. 2 Z-l-B 1 4 2 1 4 X-l-F . . 2 Z-l-C 1 5 2 1 5 X-l-G . . 2 Z-l-D 1 5 2 1 5 X-3-A .. 2 Z-l-E 1 5 5 X-3-B .. 2 1 2 Z-l-F 1 5 4 X-3-C . . 2 1 2 Z-l-G 1 5 5 X-3-D . . 2 1 2 5 2 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— PEAS First Preliminary Inspection, July 9, 1915 509 Rust or Rust or Rusty Patches Rusty Patches Lot on Cans Lot on Cans W-l-A Bad X-3-E Bad Bad Bad W-l-B Bad X-3-F Bad Bad W-l-C Bad X-3-G Bad Bad W-l-D Bad Bad Y-l-A Bad W-l-E Bad Bad Bad Y-l-B W-l-F Bad Bad Bad Y-l-C Bad W-l-G Bad Bad Y-l-D W-2-A Bad Bad W-2-B Bad Bad W-2-C Trace Bad W-2-D Bad Bad W-2-E Bad Bad W-2-F Medium Bad W-2-G Bad Bad X-l-A X-l-B X-l-C X-l-D X-l-E X-l-F X-l-G Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Medium Bad Bad Bad X-3-A Bad Bad X-3-B Bad Bad X-3-C Bad Bad X-3-D Medium Bad Bad Y-l-E Trace Bad Y-l-F Bad Bad Y-l-G Medium Medium Y-4-A Bad Bad Y-4-B Medium Bad Y-4-C Bad Bad Y-4-D Bad Bad Y-4-E Trace Bad Y-4-F Bad Bad Y-4-G None Medium Z-l-A Bad Bad Z-l-B Bad Bad Z-l-C Bad Bad Z-l-D Bad Bad Z-l-E Bad Bad Z-l-F Bad Bad Z-l-G Medium Bad 510 APPENDIX H INSPECTION DATA— PEAS— Continued Second Preliminary Inspection, August 11, 1915 Rust or Rust or Rusty Patches Rusty Patches Lot on Cans Lot on Cans W-l-A Bad X-3-D Bad Bad W-l-B Medium X-3-E Bad W-l-C Bad X-3-F Medium Medium W-l-D X-3-G W-l-E Medium Y-l-A Bad Medium W-l-F Medium Y-l-B Medium W-l-G Bad Y-i-c ...:.... Trace Y-l-D Medium W-2-A Bad Medium Y-l-E W-2-B Medium Medium Bad Y-l-F W-2-C Medium Bad Bad Y-l-G Medium W-2-D Medium Bad Medium W-2-E Medium Y-4-A Bad Bad Bad W-2-F Medium Y-4-B Medium Medium Medium W-2-G Medium Bad Y-4-C Medium Y-4-D X-l-A Medium Bad Y-4-E Medium X-l-B Medium Medium Bad Y-4-F Trace X-l-C Medium Medium Bad Y-4-G X-l-D Bad Bad Trace X-l-E Medium Z-l-A None Bad Trace X-l-F Medium Z-l-B None Medium Medium X-l-G Medium Z-l-C None Z-l-D X-3-A Trace Bad Z-l-E X-3-B Trace Medium Z-l-F Trace X-3-C None Medium Z-l-G APPENDIX H 511 INSPECTION DATA— PEAS— Continued First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot W-l-A . Can Number ... 1 Vacuum Inches 8 Rust or Rusty Patches on Cans Bad Lot W-2-A . Can Number .. 1 Vacuum Inches 8 Rust or Rusty Pa.tches on Cans Bad 2 , — Mg. per Kg. — N Lot Can No Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 3 74 24 Y-l-A 3 56 6 B 3 68 5 . B 3 82 6 C 3 62 7 C Q 74 5 D 3 57 5 D 3 74 5 E 3 58 6 E 3 75 5 F 3 125 5 F 3 72 4 G 3 85 5 G 3 76 4 W-2-A 3 86 5 Y-4-A 3 87 B 3 83 5 B 3 89 7 C 3 83 5 C 3 74 4 D 3 56 4 D 3 75 5 E 3 80 4 E 3 69 5 F 3 75 5 F 3 75 4 G 3 68 5 G 3 52 4 X-l-A 3 76 10 Z-l-A 3 62 18 B 3 72 5 B 3 75 6 C 3 72 Lost C 3 69 Lost D 3 77 5 D 3 49 6 E 3 67 3 E 3 78 11 F Lost Lost 5 F 3 74 10 G 86 13 G 3 68 5 X-3-A 3 65 11 B 3 67 10 C 3 54 7 D 3 76 8 E Lost Lost 5 F 3 63 5 G 3 78 5 578 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MICHIGAN APPLES— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — s ^Mg. per Kg. — ^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 5 54 14 X-3-E 5 82 7 A 6 44 24 E 6 86 7 B 5 60 13 F 5 89 8 B 6 55 13 F 6 87 6 C 5 46 14 G 5 78 6 C 6 43 12 G 6 81 5 D 5 51 12 D 6 58 8 Y-l-A 5 73 11 E 5 86 7 A 6 86 9 E 6 48 7 B 5 73 7 F 5 77 6 B 6 80 7 F 6 87 7 C 5 83 9 G 5 72 5 C 6 75 6 G 6 78 6 D 5 83 7 D 6 74 6 W-2-A 5 83 7 E •5 77 5 A 6 75 6 • E 6 76 6 B 5 89 5 F 5 82 6 B * 6 68 Lost F 6 89 7 C 5 87 7 G 5 81 5 C 6 83 6 G 6 99 6 D 5 66 6 8 D 6 78 6 Y-4-A 5 94 E 5 73 6 A 6 90 8 E 6 88 5 B 5 77 6 F 5 83 7 B 6 73 7 F 6 83 6 C 5 71 6 G 5 76 6 C 3 85 7 G 6 85 " 5 D 5 81 6 D 6 77 7 X-l-A 5 109 13 E 5 77 7 A 6 86 7 E 6 72 6 B 5 88 6 F 5 81 7 B 6 78 7 F 6 87 7 C 5 79 6 G 5 90 6 C 6 73 7 G 6 89 6 D 5 80 11 D 6 75 7 Z-l-A 5 82 9 E 5 64 6 A 6 82 9 E 6 74 5 B 5 84 8 F 5 84 7 B 6 85 9 F 6 85 7 C 5 89 7 G 5 87 5 C 6 97 8 G 6 81 5 D 5 68 7 D 6 6Q 22 X-3-A 5 69 6 E 5 77 9 A 6 72 9 E 6 89 7 B 5 66 6 F 5 83 7 B 6 70 7 F 6 79 9 C 5 73 6 G 5 77 5 C 6 75 7 G 6 90 6 D 5 86 6 ■ D 6 75 6 APPENDIX I 579 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MICHIGAN APPLES— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — N , — Mg\ per Kg. — •> Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 10 40 7 X-3-E 10 79 6 A 9 86 6 E 9 92 5 B 10 89 7 F 10 98 9 B 9 96 7 F 9 55 6 C 10 29 10 G 10 85 5 C 9 57 5 G 9 92 5 D 10 41 5 D 9 55 6 Y-l-A 10 65 7 E 10 20 10 A 9 80 10 E 9 Lost 6 B 10 89 8 F 10 58 6 B 9 98 8 F 9 81 6 C 10 75 5 G 10 87 6 C 9 80 6 G 9 67 5 D 10 89 7 D 9 88 6 W-2-A 10 51 5 E 10 72 7 A 9 Lost 6 E 9 87 7 B 10 68 5 F 10 80 10 B 9 82 5 F 9 81 5 C 10 149 4 G 10 87 7 C 9 75 4 G 9 78 6 D 10 82 5 D 9 95 6 Y-4-A 10 92 6 E 10 68 5 A 9 82 7 E 9 86 5 B 10 108 7 F 10 82 5 B 9 90 7 F 9 53 4 C 10 80 6 G 10 52 5 C 9 107 6 G 9 59 9 D 10 76 6 D 9 88 7 X-l-A 10 60 6 E 10 68 7 A 9 89 7 E 9 76 7 B 10 81 6 F 10 66 6 B 9 85 7 F 9 57 7 C 10 67 8 G 10 48 8 C 9 78 6 G 9 57 7 D 10 81 7 D 9 89 5 Z-l-A 10 89 10 E 10 59 12 A 9 Lost 15 E 9 82 11 B 10 72 7 F 10 83 4 B 9 99 7 F 9 85 4 C 10 79 6 G 10 89 6 C 9 101 6 G 9 96 5 D 10 81 12 D 9 57 8 X-3-A 10 79 6 E 10 58 9 A 9 74 Lost E 9 52 8 B 10 78 5 F 10 27 m m B 9 85 11 F 9 70 Lost C 10 83 7 G 10 Lost Lost C 9 26 6 G 9 65 13 D 10 61 5 D 9 66 5 580 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MICHIGAN APPLES — Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 , — Mg. per Kg. — ^ r-Mg. per Kg. — s Lot Can No Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 8 45 8 X-3-E 8 87 22 A 7 59 13 E 7 87 6 B 8 66 8 F 8 90 5 B 7 59 13 F 7 86 5 C 8 66 8 G 8 87 5 C 7 28 8 G 7 143 5 D 8 48 11 D 7 65 7 Y-l-A 8 92 9 E 8 43 6 A 7 77 9 E 7 79 5 B 8 86 10 F 8 80 6 B 7 97 10 F 7 83 5 C 8 72 7 G 8 59 5 C 7 63 8 G 7 66 5 D 8 65 7 D 7 70 6 W-2-A 8 79 6 E 8 79 5 A 7 64 8 E 7 82 10 B 8 62 6 F 8 80 8 B 7 50 Lost F 7 81 8 C 8 74 6 G 8 Lost 7 C 7 54 8 G 7 72 6 D 8 59 5 D 7 63 5 Y-4-A 8 93 8 E 8 83 6 A 7 31 9 E 7 74 6 B 8 41 7 F 8 69 5 B 7 17 9 F 7 63 5 C 8 21 9 G 8 64 4 C 7 24 9 G 7 66 8 D 8 25 8 D 7 15 7 X-l-A 8 105 15 E 8 64 8 A 7 77 9 E 7 83 8 B 8 94 24 F 8 87 10 B 7 84 5 F 7 71 7 C 8 80 14 G 8 Lost 5 C 7 82 5 G 7 77 19 D 8 92 7 D 7 94 8 Z-l-A 8 83 13 E 8 65 7 A 7 85 9 E 7 74 8 B 8 87 11 F 8 71 7 B 7 84 14 F 7 73 6 C 8 56' 20 G 8 77 6 C 7 70 27 G 7 92 7 D 8 80 12 D 7 63 20 X-3-A 8. 73 6 E 8 72 18 A i 84 19 E 7 44 Lost B 8 63 12 F 8 80 10 B 7 90 8 F 7 55 10 C 8 93 5 G 8 68 12 C 7 75 7 G 7 75 8 D 8 90 8 D 7 137 19 APPENDIX I 581 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MICHIGAN APPLES— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — N r-Mg". per Kg-. — N Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 10 83 7 X-3-E 10 73 11 A 9 58 6 E 9 73 7 B 10 57 5 F 10 89 7 B 9 52 5 F 9 85 8 C 10 63 4 G 10 72 12 C 9 61 4 G 9 92 9 D 10 65 6 D 9 6Q 5 Y-l-A 10 76 Lost • E 10 59 3 A 9 80 10 E 9 52 5 B 10 87' 7 F 10 68 5 B 9 80 11 F 9 83 4 C 10 67 8 G 10 88 4 C 9 65 7 G 9 70 4 D 10 56 7 D 9 56 6 W-2-A 10 74 5 E 10 78 7 A 9 83 6 E 9 61 8 B 10 69 5 F 10 72 11 B 9 77 5 F 9 61 17 C 10 71 10 G 10 60 8 C 9 51 4 G 9 54 8 D 10 86 6 D 9 3 Y-4-A 10 74 9 E 10 82 9 A 9 79 8 E 9 63 8 B 10 74 12 F 10 58 7 B 9 71 6 F 9 75 6 C 10 69 12 G 10 ■ 70 5 C 9 37 7 G 9 54 6 D 10 78 11 D 9 81 10 X-l-A 10 99 7 E 10 65 6 A 9 100 7 E 9 63 6 B 10 79 7 F 10 80 8 B 9 92 7 F 9 73 8 C 10 69 7 G 10 74 6 C 9 85 11 G 9 80 7 D 10 92 12 D 9 89 14 Z-l-A 10 112 20 E 10 85 9 A 9 126 17 E 9 87 12 B 10 93 10 F 10 79 10 B 9 107 9 F 9 49 10 C 10 66 Lost G 10 69 12 C 9 77 7 G 9 67 8 D 10 47 7 D 9 61 7 X-3-A 10 57 9 E 10 98 10 A 9 84 8 E 9 54 ,9 B 10 77 9 F 10 76 9 B 9 69 9 F 9 87 9 C 10 65 8 G 10 56 15 C 9 71 9 G 9 54 16 D 10 89 8 D 9 73 8 582 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW YORK APPLES First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — s Iron Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — N Iron W-l-A 15 111 8 Y-l-A 7 160 8 B 2 168 11 B 11 170 7 C 1 162 7 C 23 118 8 D 14 149 6 D 23 145 5 E 19 177 6 E 13 171 5 F 1 189 6 F 15 167 5 G 1 167 5 G 16 178 6 W-2-A 1 143 8 Y-4-A 23 149 7 B 1 174 7 B 13 160 15 C 21 170 6 C 13 175 5 D 15 186 7 D 20 199 7 E 1 161 4 E 13 145 5 F 18 125 6 F 13 149 6 G 15 172 5 G 13 189 5 X-l-A 13 166 7 Z-l-A 19 146 9 B 13 141 5 B 19 170 7 C 13 Lost 7 C 19 263 10 D 5 146 7 D 19 157 11 E 8 149 4 E 19 210 7 F 15 157 5 F 15 210 6 G 15 180 6 G 14 Lost Lost X-3-A 7 136 7 B 9 158 4 C 9 178 6 t D 9 166 8 E 7 162 5 F 9 157 6 G 8 179 5 APPENDIX I 583 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW YORK APPLES— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — s r-Mg. per Kg\ — s Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 21 151 8 Y-l-A 19 185 8 B 18 168 7 B 9 182 7 C 5 139 5 C 21 153 5 D 18 178 5 D 21 168 5 E 13 151 6 E 15 168 4 F 6 169 6 F 13 172 6 G 4 184 5 G 13 192 5 W-2-A 3 132 17 Y-4-A 21 171 6 B 3 161 5 B 15 171 6 C 15 165 • 6 C 15 193 5 D 11 160 5 D 15 193 6 E 7 304 10 E 19 148 6 F 6 173 6 F 21 186 5 G 12 200 5 G 19 172 5 X-l-A 9 172 12 Z-l-A 16 159 8 B 9 177 6 B 20 199 6 C 12 181 6 C 13 174 6 D 10 154 5 D 13 141 4 E 11 168 4 E 13 146 6 F 9 135 4 F 21 155 4 G 9 198 6 G 21 201 4 X-3-A 15 128 5 B 13 154 6 C 13 169 5 D 13 183 5 E 14 146 4 F 8 176 4 G 10 199 4 584 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS- EW YOR] £ APPLES— Continued :tion, April 10, 1916 Lot Can No. ^-Mg. Tin per Kg. — . Iron X-3-E 8 179 6 E 9 190 5 F 7 187 4 F 11 176 4 G 11 204 4 G 14 181 4 Y-l-A 23 146 7 A 11 166 8 B 5 168 6 B 6 174 7 C 17 182 5 C 18 180 8 D 17 175 7 D 18 182 6 E 17 180 6 E 21 197 4 F 17 173 Lost F 18 151 4 G 18 198 5 G 19 214 4 Y-4-A 17 173 7 A 18 169 Lost B 17 184 7 B 18 180 5 C 18 170 6 C 17 177 Lost D 17 182 5 D 14 158 5 E 14 168 5 E 17 180 6 F 14 159 6 F 17 186 6 G 16 196 5 G 17 200 6 Z-l-A 14 138 6 A 15 158 7 B 14 153 7 B 13 182 7 C 18 180 7 C 14 175 7 D 20 147 5 D 23 130 5 E 14 147 5 E 17 155 6 F 14 190 5 F 17 186 5 G 18 190 4 G 17 211 4 r—Mg. per Kg. - Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 20 166 16 A 17 157 8 B 11 179 12 B 10 175 8 C 8 204 7 C 7 194 8 D 20 139 16 D 17 178 6 E 17 197 8 E 17 179 7 F 11 199 8 F 3 174 6 G 11 190 6 G 5 185 6 W-2-A 5 177 6 A 11 161 6 B 9 193 8 B 8 180 7 C 20 162 7 C 23 175 8 D 22 171 8 D 17 195 5 E 5 193 5 E 4 197 7 F 16 182 7 F 22 173 5 G 11 Lost 6 G 10 192 5 X-l-A 16 180 11 A 11 191 7 B 14 171 6 B 8 175 5 C 15 159 6 C 11 168 6 D 20 163 5 D 6 164 5 E 20 177 5 E 14 . 184 5 F 11 189 4 F 14 195 5 G 17 202 4 G 14 214 4 X-3-A 11 159 5 A 17 156 3 B 16 184 4 B 8 173 5 C 11 161 5 C 8 178 17 D 11 166 5 D 8 184 10 APPENDIX I 585 EW YOR* : APPLE IS — Continued ction, June 12, 1916 Lot Can No. r~ Mg-. Tin per Kg. - Iron X-3-E 13 203 ' 5 E 11 203 5 F 16 202 5 F 13 206 5 G 17 218 4 G 16 76 4 Y-l-A 22 173 8 A 21 182 8 B 8 131 6 B 7 185 6 C 20 171 7 C 19 160 12 D 20 178 13 D 19 195 5 E 24 179 5 E 20 171 5 F 20 158 7 F 19 157 7 G 22 189 5 G 15 171 6 Y-4-A 20 120 6 A 19 148 7 B 20 195 7 B 19 114 10 C 20 146 5 C 19 184 5 D 23 112 5 D 21 178 5 E 23 187 ' 7 E 20 164 6 F 23 183 6 F 20 196 6 G 23 268 6 G 20 198 6 Z-l-A 20 161 9 A 17 141 8 B 16 185 7 B 18 149 7 C 23 196 6 C 20 186 6 D 18 170 8 D 15 146 7 E 23 215 7 E 20 Lost 6 F 23 124 6 F 20 202 7 G 23 193 6 G 20 235 6 r-Mg-. per Kg. — Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 14 142 10 A 23 144 9 B 17 134 7 B 24 178 8 C 10 352 6 C 21 194 6 D 21 169 5 D 23 158 14 E 18 190 5 E 23 194 7 F 7 171 ' 7 F 8 202 9 G 8 188 5 G 12 189 6 W-2-A 6 127 7 A 9 185 7 B 4 156 7 B 10 198 6 C 14 193 5 C 22 202 12 D 16 172 5 D 20 166 6 E 8 177 5 E 11 225 8 F 5 198 5 F 11 202 7 G 13 408 5 G 22 228 6 X-l-A 8 179 5 A 15 184 6 B 11 164 6 B 16 149 5 C 8 166 6 C 16 159 5 D 4 124 4 D 14 196 5 E 19 164 4 E 21 234 5 F 13 159 Lost F 17 139 5 G 8 135 5 G 13 X-3-A 14 141 6 A 13 181 6 B 14 175 4 B 11 163 7 C 14 156 7 C 17 172 5 D 14 173 5 D 17 113 5 586 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW YORK APPLES- Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 -Continued r-Mg. per Kg. - Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 19 188 8 A 18 146 8 B 16 201 7 B 8 176 11 C 12 201 7 C 4 187 8 D 22 192 9 D 19 168 6 E 22 159 12 E 21 68 9 F 5 208 7 F 4 184 6 G 9 178 5 G 6 192 12 W-2-A 12 186 12 A 4 161 11 B 12 182 7 B 7 85 7 C 19 187 . 7 C 13 182 6 D 23 179 6 D 19 170 6 E 10 196 7 E 9 184 7 F 10 215 8 F 4 194 6 G 16 197 6 G 7 195 5 X-l-A 18 184 9 A 17 Lost 9 B 17 179 7 B 10 146 6 C 17 170 6 C 10 177 8 D 18 211 9 D 12 181 5 E 13 172 6 E 10 164 6 F 10 182 6 F 1 189 7 G 10 194 * 4 G 7 187 5 X-3-A 12 172 8 A 9 163 8 B 10 192 6 B 7 174 5 C ]8 154 5 C 15 194 6 D 18 202 5 D 15 154 6 Lot X-3 Y-l- Y-4 Z-l-A A B B C C D D E E F F G G Can No. 16 12 14 12 12 7 10 9 2 1 16 15 14 13 23 22 24 23 24 23 15 14 24 23 24 23 19 16 18 15 18 15 18 15 24 21 24 21 44 21 24 21 24 21 18 13 16 13 r-Mg. Tin 181 151 181 181 185 131 195 197 156 189 150 195 188 206 187 188 128 167 182 222 167 181 164 195 Lost 192 218 143 171 162 182 166 204 212 164 129 159 231 187 204 171 141 149 163 159 201 170 207 per Kg. — Iron 9 7 10 8 6 6 8 5 6 8 10 10 9 Lost 7 7 6 7 5 6 7 7 9 18 6 10 11 8 10 8 6 7 6 6 APPENDIX I 587 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW YORK APPLES— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 r- Mg. per Kg. — N r-Mg. per Kg. — x Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 10 203 14 X-3-E 2 172 7 A 9 161 12 E 1 184 7 B 22 194 10 F 3 157 5 B 13 161 8 F 2 155 6 C 20 194 9 G 2 194 6 C 2 161 7 G 1 184 Lost D 10 176 8 D 7 177 7 Y-l-A 2 149 7 E 10 185 8 A 1 187 7 E 7 194 6 B 4 178 8 F 22 184 8 B 3 244 14 F 21 147 7 C 2 179 8 G 15 173 8 C 1 174 7 G 3 187 7 D 2 153 8 D 1 157 8 W-2-A 8 176 7 E 2 170 8 A 7 121 7 E 1 207 10 B 11 156 8 F 2 163 8 B 6 189 8 F 1 162 10 C 6 IV 3 5 G 2 180 7 C 3 165 5 G 1 173 8 D 12 174 6 D 9 146 5 Y-4-A 11 164 10 E 22 169 6 A 10 157 9 E 19 157 7 B 2 116 12 F 14 154 5 B 1 175 11 F 20 121 5 C 2 172 8 G 9 172 6 C 1 180 7 G 8 195 6 D 2 179 6 D 1 189 7 ' X-l-A 5 181 • 11 E 2 189 7 A 3 161 9 E 1 183 6 B 7 187 8 F 2 167 7 B 6 174 8 F 1 166 7 C 18 185 9 G 22 196 6 C 7 184 9 G 21 206 6 D 11 177 ' 6 D 9 174 7 Z-l-A 2 141 5 E 7 197 ■ 8 A 1 148 4 E 6 185 7 B 11 156 4 F 21 174 6 B 7 160 16 F 18 159 6 C 11 199 4 G 11 192 8 C 10 181 4 G 3 194 5 D 2 155 4 D 1 155 9 X-3-A 22 142 8 E 2 205 6 A 16 174 8 E 1 184 5 B 22 200 6 F 2 196 4 B 17 166 6 F 1 183 6 C 21 194 8 G 22 228 4 C 20 180 7 G 19 212 5 D 20 157 6 D 21 150 8 588 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — N Iron Lot Can No. Tin per Kg. — N Iron W-l-A 21 31 15 Y-l-A 22 42 11 B 9 71 14 B 23 67 11 C 21 66 21 C 21 70 8 D 11 65 12 D 21 58 15 E 15 47 9 E 21 62 11 F 15 34 8 F 3 63 9 G 14 29 7 G 3 42 16 W-2-A 10 65 10 Y-4-A 23 70 29 B 13 59 28 B 23 78 11 C 23 66 13 C 1 63 56 D 13 66 7 D 1 53 15 E 13 37 11 E 21 76 8 F 15 73 7 F 21 85 8 G 21 68 9 G 1 86 8 X-l-A 21 79 54 Z-l-A 21 Lost Lost B 21 80 13 B 21 70 90 C 22 Lost 9 C 1 63 11 D 21 77 9 D 1 72 16 E 20 72 13 E 1 72 15 F 21 43 7 F 1 63 9 G 21 40 12 G 1 85 10 X-3-A 23 55 20 * B 23 38 11 C 23 47 16 D 21 104 12 E 21 92 8 F 21 50 23 G 23 56 5 APPENDIX I 589 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot Can No. Tin per Kg. — N Iron Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — N Iron W-l-A 20 34 10 Y-l-A 18 177 28 B 11 67 6 B 18 55 11 C 23 72 14 C 23 97 7 D 10 101 15 D 13 84 8 E 11 79 6 E 23 74 7 F 16 38 ( F 1 80 6 G 15 40 6 G 1 101 7 W-2-A 9 67 11 Y-4-A 21 67 41 B 15 97 12 B 21 83 8 C 21 61 6 C 3 45 7 D 12 56 5 D 3 63 16 E 12 61 5 E 23 78 5 F 17 79 6 F 23 91 5 G 23 41 6 G 3 115 9 X-l-A 20 74 20 Z-l-A 16 58 27 B 23 72 8 B 23 84 20 C 21 77 7 C 3 65 11 D 23 89 8 D 3 73 11 E 21 80 5 E 5 86 12 F 23 42 4 F 5 72 7 G 23 67 10 G 3 69 28 X-3-A 22 70 19 B 22 48 9 € 22 51 6 D 23 84 8 E 20 75 8 F 23 59 5 18 60 10 590 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES- Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 -Continued r-Mg. per Kg. - Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 16 60 7 A 17 72 8 B 5 84 7 B 6 68 7 C 18 79 7 C 17 67 6 D 13 60 6 D 9 52 6 E 10 63 7 E 12 62 11 F 13 38 6 F 14 38 8 G 12 39 5 G 13 30 8 W-2-A 6 65 7 A i 59 9 B 19 74 13 B 18 89 7 C 19 81 5 C 18 80 9 D 10 74 9 D 9 68 14 E 10 85 5 E 11 67 8 F 11 83 14 F 14 98 6 G 18 71 6 G 17 53 7 X-l-A 15 104 18 A 18 113 16 B 13 125 13 B 14 79 34 C 18 72 14 C 19 74 38 D 17 94 12 D 18 100 9 E 14 97 10 E 18 91 11 F 17 50 . 5 F 18 63 9 G 13 78 5 G 17 93 4 X-3-A 17 70 80 A 18 57 70 B 16 57 8 B 14 56 5 C 17 48 6 C 18 55 6 D 20 73 11 D 16 81 5 Lot X-3-E E F F G G Y-l-A A B B C C D D E E F F G G Y-4- A A B B C C D D E E F F G G Z-l-A A B B C C D D E E F F G G Can No. 23 19 18 17 19 1 17 20 19 17 13 14 15 14 14 13 5 6 7 14 13 20 17 6 5 6 5 15 13 18 17 6 5 23 17 16 7 5 6 7 4 8 4 3 .7 — Mg\ per Kg. — Tin Iron 57 82 66 60 64 77 51 91 81 73 59 85 83 60 98 66 58 74 67 77 83 103 102 70 64 162 225 58 147 48 43 81 57 71 61 48 64 71 81 51 7 61 10 77 10 63 14 79 6 91 8 6 9 7 25 20 6 5 9 16 42 27 9 9 6 6 20 11 8 8 6 6 38 135 66 60 63 42 48 36 56 54 20 10 26 15 APPENDIX I 591 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — N r~ Mgr. per Kg\ — s Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 15 55 11 X-3-E 14 58 18 A 19 70 20 E 24 80 18 B 7 70 35 F 19 54 7 B 8 106 32 F 24 73 6 C 7 60 11 G 21 62 6 C 20 120 10 G 22 56 46 D 7 64 7 D 16 66 7 Y-l-A 19 56 8 E 16 85 7 A 14 51 6 E 17 49 21 B 20 72 7 F 20 32 '7 B 22 70 6 F 19 42 7 C 15 74 6 G 18 29 8 C 16 39 6 G 19 39 7 D 7 68 16 D 8 69 6 W-2-A 2 73 12 E 5 70 15 A 8 83 12 E 6 92 7 B 20 50 15 F 8 90 6 B 21 73 18 F 12 80 7 C 14 72 18 G 8 143 6 C 15 98 8 G 9 89 6 D 18 63 5 D 16 76 11 Y-4-A 15 88 8 E 16 95 6 A 16 79 5 E 17 92 6 B 14 123 11 F 18 91 6 B 19 89 30 F 21 114 7 C 7 58 13 G 19 53 6 C 10 105 10 G 20 32 6 D 7 77 6 D 8 60 7 X-l-A 14 48 6 E 7 ' 70 12 A 16 129 27 E 16 98 10 B 18 60 6 F 19 81 10 B 20 65 7 F 20 64 7 C 4 58 57 G 8 77 7 C 20 55 75 G 7 86 5 D 8 59 24 D 20 80 8 Z-l-A . m E 19 69 7 A , . E 22 72 7 B 2 87 60 F 19 47 6 B 6 91 12 F 20 89 7 C 11 43 70 G 19 103 6 C 6 80 14 G 20 64 Lost D 16 50 D 15 56 13 X-3-A 16 44 7 E 7 95 48 A 15 72 7 E 23 77 34 B 21 51 14 F 10 58 11 B 17 47 11 F 6 130 10 C 21 48 6 G 9 146 6 C 20 43 22 G 11 77 24 D 15 59 13 D 19 62 18 592 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — , r- Mgr. per Kg-. — x Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 18 62 11 X-3-E 15 62 15 A 14 62 7 E 13 75 60 B 2 79 5 F 10 Lost 7o B 1 69 11 F 2 85 Lost C 9 107 19 G 11 76 7 C 8 109 9 G 8 82 8 D 15 67 12 D 9 73 6 Y-l-A 16 57 11 E 8 66 6 A 11 65 Lost E 7 75 26 B 16 82 11 F 21 43 6 B 15 76 11 F 12 46 15 C 6 75 8 G 20 45 6 C 5 71 22 G 9 35 7 D 18 59 7 D 17 66 13 W-2-A 4 77 8 E 17 69 10 A 1 71 11 E 7 84 7 B 23 81 11 F 16 107 8 B 21 81 50 F 11 76 12 C 16 62 11 G 12 76 rv l C 13 82 9 G 11 116 8 D 17 53 12 D 8 85 10 Y-4-A 17 144 17 E 8 47 12 A 9 145 32 E 7 75 7 B 15 116 21 F 12 97 8 B 13 90 18 F 10 76 7 C 15 113 70 G 16 70 6 C 14 65 13 G 15 47 8 D 12 63 12 D 11 53 11 X-l-A 11 99 13 E 9 79 12 A 10 89 20 E 8 84 9 B 19 F 16 73 37 B 15 92 9 F 12 97 11 C 8 146 36 G 12 77 9 C 7 80 33 G 11 89 Lost D 5 76 8 D 4 91 16 Z-l-A , , E 12 89 6 A 128 E 7 84 7 B F 8 78 9 B F 5 59 5 C G 16 103 7 C 14 Lost 45 G 15 90 4 D 20 135 50 D 18 172 65 X-3-A 11 59 11 E 13 Lost 60 A 9 101 22 E 12 94 80 B 10 63 17 F 9 54 60 B 8 69 11 F 8 51 80 C 14 67 12 G 5 94 7 C 9 66 16 G 4 72 17 D 17 82 8 D 13 75 7 APPENDIX I 593 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— PENNSYLVANIA APPLES- Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 -Continued ^-Mg. per Kg. — Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 13 51 9 A 9 27 17 B 4 71 22 B 3 76 8 C 16 69 8 c 13 46 Lost D 19 51 20 D 18 53 10 E 18 68 11 E 9 65 10 F 22 32 ' 8 F 11 43 8 G 11 35 11 G 10 40 8 W-2-A 13 6o 14, A 5 68 7 B 10 63 7 B 9 111 9 C 12 66 16 C 9 56 D 21 69 7 D 6 47 9 E 20 67 6 E 6 51 10 F 20 75 8 F 8 85 10 G 14 8 G 13 46 10 X-l-A 12 112 21 A i 140 17 B 12 132 40 B 11 124 60 C 14 54 7 C 13 115 73 D 15 91 7 D 14 103 21 E 16 82 6 E 15 90 7 F 16 54 7 F 15 98 7 G 14 86 15 G 8 93 16 X-3-A 10 65 8 A 7 109 11 B 18 58 7 B 15 36 9 C 12 37 16 C 11 46 6 D 10 100 72 D 10 79 10 Lot X-3-E E F F G G Y-l- Y-4-A A B B C C D D E E F F G G Z-l-A A B B C C D D E E F F G G Can No. 11 10 12 11 5 4 10 7 14 13 8 7 20 19 20 9 10 9 14 10 12 11 16 5 13 12 14 9 20 19 2 1 10 6 Mg\ per Kg. — Iron 23 22 11 12 10 Tin 111 107 65 35 90 71 92 69 105 94 69 47 71 66 92 91 89 107 63 45 56 69 69 74 79 89 46 53 75 73 75 94 141 87 120 138 319 94 96 12 11 14 27 14 10 13 9 12 8 22 21 16 34 23 8 20 10 9 10 10 15 11 9 12 17 14 9 594 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— STRING BEANS First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — N Iron Lot Can No. ^-Mg. Tin per Kg. --» Iron W-l-A 45 80 17 Y-l-A 25 75 10 B 45 75 22 B 42 94 12 C 45 101 16 C 22 98 11 D 47 90 15 D 45 141 15 E 44 123 16 E 42 111 14 F 46 150 19 F 45 125 14 G 23 145 33 G 46 161 12 W-2-A 21 97 18 Y-4-A 45 83 13 B 45 78 13 B 23 100 11 C 45 98 13 C 41 93 14 D 47 130 15 D 41 88 11 E 23 105 14 E 43 103 13 F 46 154 13 F 43 129 14 G 45 140 ■ 14 • G 21 151 16 X-l-A 21 90 14 Z-l-A 45 91 12 B 44 107 13 B 46 82 15 C 45 82 14 C 45 131 15 D 15 84 12 D 32 124 14 E 23 120 16 E 45 131 13 F 21 118 11 F 45 149 13 G 45 ' 131 13 G 45 154 19 X-3-A 45 81 13 B 23 76 11 C 21 88 11 D 41 94 23 . E 46 127 14 F 45 128 15 G 21 126 12 APPENDIX I 595 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— STRING BEANS— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg\ — x Iron Lot Can No. Tin per Kg. — ^ Iron W-l-A 40 Lost 18 Y-l-A 13 144 21 B 43 91 19 B 21 140 18 C 21 128 19 C 41 129 15 D 18 97 20 D 42 156 9 E 41 134 14 E 39 159 11 F 43 158 13 F 42 143 11 G 21 171 13 G 42 163 13 W-2-A 36 132 19 Y-4-A 42 100 14 B 43 100 13 B 21 117 12 C 41 119 13 C 1 154 12 D 45 151 9 D 43 Lost 14 E 21 163 11 E 41 164 13 F 45 147 15 F 41 176 12 G 43 175 16 G 45 252 12 X-l-A B 45 41 87 119 15 17 C 43 130 12 D 41 125 13 E 45 161 21 F 43 167 15 G 43 124 14 Z-l-A B C D E F 43 106 11 44 121 16 41 130 13 21 129 13 18 222 13 41 185 14 43 202 13 -3-A 47 129 15 B 47 150 15 C 46 123 15 D 43 Lost 14 E 43 135 14 F 43 174 18 G 22 152 15 596 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— STRING BEANS— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 r~ Mg\ per Kg. — ^ r-Mg. per Kg. — N Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 34 111 16 X-3-E 38 138 16 A 33 115 17 F 38 150 14 B 37 128 14 F 39 163 15 B 39 126 15 G 7 224 13 C 17 122 16 G 18 185 15 C 18 105 16 D 17 131 15 Y-l-A 17 135 12 D 19 139 12 A 18 149 14 E 38 150 13 B 37 104 13 E 37 161 14 B 38 Lost Lost F 39 190 12 C 37 140 13 F 38 177 11 C 38 149 11 G 17 206 13 D 37 160 23 G 16 204 16 D 38 163 15 E 22 207 13 W-2-A 26 142 Lost E 20 180 16 A 25 128 15 F 37 123 13 B 37 132 15 F 38 213 15 B 38 120 16 G 39 177 13 C 37 139 15 G 38 212 13 C 38 134 15 D 37 128 13 Y-4-A 39 128 15 D 41 141 14 ,A 38 129 15 E 41 180 13 B 14 138 18 E 43 172 14 B 13 176 14 F 37 166 13 C 21 235 14 F 41 145 13 C 16 224 20 G 37 191 15 D 37 146 15 G 38 197 14 D 36 166 15 E 37 155 14 X-l-A 39 118 14 E 36 204 12 A 42 122 16 F 38 173 14 B 38 135 15 F 19 198 12 B 37 135 13 G 17 230 13 C 37 132 14 G 13 229 12 C 38 133 15 D 37 138 13 Z-l-A 38 112 14 D 38 117 13 A 39 120 14 E 37 153 11 B 39 136 34 E 38 170 12 B 40 108 16 F 39 204 16 C 37 148 27 F 40 153 13 C 38 132 16 G 38 151 16 D 17 155 13 G 39 158 16 D 18 156 14 E 40 212 13 X-3-A 40 123 13 E 42 233 14 A 41 108 13 F 38 210 12 B 42 126 16 F 39 209 15 B 43 130 14 G 37 221 14 C 41 154 14 G 38 206 12 C 42 152 14 D 34 123 14 D 38 122 18 APPENDIX I 597 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— STRING BEANS- -Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. -^ r- Mg\ per Kg. — ., Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 28 101 15 X-3-E 37 174 13 A 31 141 20 E 40 13 B 28 121 14 F 37 147 13 B 25 128 Lost F 40 134 12 C 31 157 13 G 5 157 12 C 29 174 15 G 8 203 12 D 8 149 13 D 7 163 11 Y-l-A 31 118 13 E 3G 162 12 A 40 117 14 E 34 177 11 B 33 107 10 F 37 196 11 B 40 107 12 F 35 219 12 C 34 107 12 G 46 226 13 C 35 161 12 G 45 228 10 D 34 142 12 D 40 206 13 W-2-A 41 182 13 E 38 213 13 A 35 133 13 E 41 213 16 B • 40 140 14 F 33 175 12 B 33 142 12 F 40 153 13 C 40 144 12 G 37 186 14 C 33 140 13 G 40 198 13 D 38 148 11 D 39 147 13 Y-4-A 40 134 12 E 42 224 13 A 37 137 13 E 44 207 13 B 18 119 14 F 38 212 13 B 15 129 15 F 39 178 . 13 C 42 147 14 G 39 186 13 C 23 212 13 G 40 208 14 D 34 120 12 D 33 153 12 X-l-A 38 95 13 E 35 143 12 A 37 107 12 E 34 215 13 B 36 152 • 13 F 37 176 11 B 35 122 12 F 36 188 11 C 33 157 12 G 43 269 11 C 36 1.45 12 G 47 273 Lost D 34 145 12 D 35 119 13 Z-l-A 37 117" 11 E 36 159 8 A 34 126 12 E 40 160 10 B 20 108 12 F 38 196 12 B 24 122 15 ■ F 41 222 9 C 24 173 12 G 37 184 11 C 23 142 13 G 40 166 12 D 20 167 12 D 14 220 12 X-3-A 38 126 12 E 22 237 11 A 39 93 11 E 17 Lost Lost B 37 120 Lost F 40 213 12 B 41 130 12 F 37 152 12 C 37 124 11 G 40 210 11 C 44 140 11 G 22 217 11 D 35 146 Lost D 36 111 10 598 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— STRING BEANS- -Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 /-Mg. per Kg. — , , — Mg. per Kg.-, Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 4 151 17 X-3-E 3 171 14 A 11 146 E 22 169 22 B 27 134 9 F 22 166 13 B 31 173 17 F 23 210 13 C 38 172 17 G 37 256 13 C 39 172 16 G 38 285 13 D 2 191 15 D 24 207 16 Y-l-A 24 163 15 E 22 182 13 A 29 195 14 E 32 140 14 B 26 165 20 F 21 164 16 B 30 184 13 F 22 125 14 C 31 125 15 G 13 201 13 C 32 106 14 G 14 208 15 D 27 246 15 D 28 201 18 W-2-A 23 204 14 E 16 188 16 A 24 169 15 E 18 205 16 B 21 155 15 F 15 266 14 B 24 133 15 F 16 223 13 C 15 164 15 G 21 219 13 C 16 150 14 G 22 232 13 D 28 164 14 D 40 184 14 Y-4-A 23 109 14 E 15 145 14 A 33 116 13 E 16 156 13 B 9 Lost Lost F 12 122 14 B 10 220 13 F 21 273 16 c . 12 237 15 G 35 210 13 C 17 248 15 G 36 203 15 D 23 203 16 D 35 139 15 X-l-A 15 120 18 E 23 233 14 A 16 175 18 E 24 238 14 B 30 188 17 F 25 239 15 B 36 151 14 F 34 206 13 C 15 148 13 G 3 269 15 C 16 126 14 G 41 252 13 D 3 191 16 D 36 131 11 Z-l-A 25 130 14 E 25 209 11 A 26 128 18 E 26 146 12 B 37 168 18 F 31 191 14 B 38 156 18 G 33 185 15 C 27 167 13 G 34 343 24 C 30 156 14 D 15 183 12 X-3-A 15 147 14 D 43 210 14 A 16 181 21 E 2 250 13 B 25 116 15 E 16 264 12 B 29 144 16 F 13 260 13 C 15 206 21 F 14 222 12 C 16 144 16 G 11 254 14 D 9 133 12 G 13 275 14 D 22 209 16 APPENDIX I 599 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— STRING BEANS— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — s r-Mg. per Kg. — N Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 26 163 17. X-3-E 7 260 14 A 30 173 16 E 11 232 30 B 2 185 17 F 29 242 . # B 9 216 18 F 33 246 24 C 43 218 16 G 45 292 16 C 44 198 16 G 48 282 16 D 43 240 18 D 44 185 16 Y-l-A 11 208 14 E 28 523 16 A 9 220 16 E 33 282 14 B 24 240 18 F 17 218 14 B 28 236 14 F 18 •224 16 C 27 216 16 G 10 278 16 C 28 226 16 G 11 175 Lost D 33 212 16 D 35 286 16 W-2-A 15 174 14 E 15 260 14 A 16 160 16 E 19 246 14 B 22 186 18 F 14 264 16 B 23 186 16 F 18 272 16 C 13 242 18 G 27 286 16 C 14 200 24 G 28 280 16 D 14 234 18 D 20 212 22 Y-4-A 21 202 18 E 13 204 16 A 22 164 14 E 18 278 16 B 45 266 14 F 6 258 18 B 46 178 20 F 16 254 20 C 9 304 16 G 18 234 14 C 11 260 14 G 22 274 14 D 25 186 16 D 26 216 16 X-l-A 25 190 18 E 15 470 14 A 35 192 18 E 20 230 14 B 3 168 16 F 16 250 14 B 20 184 40 F 18 260 14 C 29 186 16 G 38 338 14 C 35 144 16 G 44 330 14 D 17 120 20 D 19 184 14 Z-l-A 19 178 16 E 19 226 14 A 23 154 14 E 22 228 16 B 15 164 16 F 23 274 16 B 23 182 14 F 33 264 26 C 17 216 14 G 11 248 24 C 36 148 14 G 13 242 22 D D 41 46 242 250 14 X-3-A 13 184 24 E 15 292 14 A 14 174 20 E 21 276 14 B 26 186 18 F 15 274 14 B 30 224 14 F 16 280 16 C 25 228 16 G 5 324 14 C 26 220 14 G 7 Lost Lost D 10 108 14 D 11 196 14 600 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— CIDER First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — ^ Iron Lot Can No. , — Mg\ per Tin Kg. -> Iron W-l-A 1 126 40 Y-l-A 1 70 22 B 1 109 25 B 1 S5 23 C 1 96 22 C 1 61 20 D 1 96 22 D 1 75 20 E 1 83 21 E 1 81 25 F 1 99 20 F 1 85 21 G 1 159 • 26 G 1 58 19 W-2-A 1 93 30 Y-4-A 1 56 21 B 1 87 19 B 1 62 20 C 1 79 17 C 1 58 19 D 1 92 20 D 1 50 20 E 1 64 18 E 1 68 18 F 1 86 17 F 1 Lost 21 G 1 95 12 G 1 60 19 X-l-A 1 73 25 Z-l-A 1 94 ' 22 B 1 76 18 B 1 60 19 C 1 80 16 C 1 53 22 D 1 87 16 D 1 76 19 E 1 68 14 E 1 82 19 F 1 97 17 F 1 74 19 G 1 91 17 . G 1 59 19 X-3-A 1 56 13 B 1 69 18 C 1 59 15 D 1 46 19 E 1 65 19 E 1 65 19 G 1 93 16 APPENDIX' I 601 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— CIDER— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot Can No. Tin per Kg. — N Iron Lot Can No. , — Mg\ per Tin TTa- . xV to . ^ Iron W-l-A 3 135 42 Y-l-A 3 69 25 B 3 74 18 B 3 87 25 C 3 87 17 C 3 62 17 D 3 100 17 D 3 110 20 E 3 118 16 E 3 103 30 F 3 104 16 F 3 74 19 G 3 86 16 G 3 96 18 W-2-A 3 85 15 Y-4-A 3 85 15 B 3 103 18 B 3 62 16 C 3 86 15 C 3 93 21 D 3 91 13 D 3 Lost Lost E 3 70 13 E 3 61 20 F 3 132 14 F 3 68 19 G 3 91 15 G 3 66 16 X-l-A 3 90 26 Z-l-A 3 69 17 B 3 52 9 B 3 83 16 C 3 75 14 C 3 67 20 D 3 85 14 D 3 99 16 E 3 104 15 E 3 85 19 F 3 130 16 F 3 125 14 G o O 165 17 G 3 ' 65 15 X-3-A 3 49 15 B 3 74 18 C 3 60 18 D 3 82 18 E 3 59 17 F 3 114 21 G 3 98 14 602 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— CIDER— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 ,— Mg\ per Kg. — x r-Mg. per Kg. — x Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 5 138 37 X-3-E 5 56 22 A 6 126 32 E 6 69 20 B 5 132 42 F 5 83 18 B 6 91 19 F 6 83 22 C 5 142 20 G 5 77 22 C 6 109 20 G 6 62 20 D 5 117 21 D 6 115 23 Y-l-A 5 55 24 E 5 124 20 A 6 53 28 E 6 81 21 B 5 68 22 F 5 112 21 B 6 86 26 F 6 81 20 C 5 77 25 G 5 96 20. C 6 65 23 G 6 ,75 20 D 5 75 20 D 6 94 24 W-2-A 5 75 23 E 5 85 18 A 6 103 23 E 6 94 22 B 5 67 18 F 5 82 20 B 6 102 20 F 6 92 18 C 5 77 21 G 5 74 19 C 6 92 21 G 6 85 18 D 5 . 77 19 D 6 83 19 Y-'l-A 5 98 21 E 5 81 18 A 6 115 30 E 6 58 19 B 5 98 24 F 5 81 18 B 6 89 22 F 6 71 26 C 5 90 24 . G 5 105 22 C 6 69 18 G 6 95 18 D 5 71 24 D 6 77 23 X-l-A 5 167 40 E 5 86 17 A 6 154 42 E 6 83 19 B 5 80 22 F 5 66 18 B 6 65 30 F 6 64 18 C 5 83 20 G 5 62 23 C 6 80 26 G 6 75 17 D 5 76 16 D 6 89 22 Z-l-A 5 99 32 E 5 52 24 A 6 66 28 E 6 72 20 B 5 72 16 F 5 92 22 B 6 65 21 F 6 96 20 C 5 64 35 G 5 92 20 C 6 95 25 G 6 71 22 D 5 107 27 D 6 95 28 X-3-A 5 89 22 E 5 84 32 A 6 69 22 E 6 109 33 B 5 107 30 F 5 65 36 B 6 79 20 F 6 75 24 C 5 55 22 G 5 67 25 C 6 52 20 G 6 79 23 D 5 40 20 D 6 86 27 APPENDIX I 603 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— CIDER— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg-. — N r-Mg-. per Kg. — v Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 7 118 17 X-3-E 7 85 40, A 8 263 80 E 8 99 28 B 7 79 28 F n i 118 28 B 8 80 . F 8 122 24 C 7 86 G 7 92 16 C 8 165 24 G 8 105 18 D 7 98 18 D 8 96 22 Y-l-A 7 124 32 E 7 108 20 A 8 190 42 E 8 114 .18 B 7 143 24 F 7 106 16 B 8 88 F 8 107 16 C 7 73 30 G 7 108 16 8 83 26 G 8 142 24 D 7 98 22 D 8 92 24 W-2-A i 96 20 E 7 129 26 A 8 86 18 E 8 101 24 B i 110 19 F 7 124 24 B 8 85 19 F 8 98 24 C 7 120 16 G 7 91 20 , c 8 92 16 G 8 99 20 D 7 103 18 D 8 89 14 Y-4-A 7 107 30 E 7 87 16 A 8 162 90 E 8 104 16 B 7 92 20 F 7 117 17 B 8 121 22 F 8 132 21 C 7 85 22 G 7 110 19 C 8 103 26 G 8 183 18 D 7 104 28 D 8 101 30 X-l-A 7 110 22 E 7 69 18 A 8 130 23 E 8 72 20 B 7 125 20 F 7 89 24 B 8 143 21 F 8 139 22 C 7 100 22 G 7 92 30 C 8 110 26 G 8 89 18 D 7 115 23 D 8 110 31 Z-l-A IV i 102 36 E 7 107 30 A 8 124 38 E 8 124 50 B 7 76 22 F 7 145 32 B 8 85 20 F 8 114 25 C 7 98 28 G 7 101 16 C 8 87 25 G 8 103 18 D 7 102 23 X-3-A 7 75 50 D 8 107 23 A 8 98 60 E 7 111 23 B 7 77 20 E 8 67 20 B 8 89 25 F 7 115 20 C 7 87 18 F 8 73 18 C 8 102 25 G 7 105 20 D 7 82 34 G 8 82 18 D 8 113 90 604 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— CIDER— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — N r-Mg. per Kg. — ., Lot Can No. Till Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 9 106 16 X-3-E 9 123 30 A 10 103 23 E 10 101 25 B 9 96 24 F 9 136 22 B 10 81 25 F 10 108 27 C 9 141 29 G 9 106 22 C 10 133 25 G 10 83 25 D 9 93 21 D 10 131 26 Y-l-A 9 138 22 E 9 161 28 A 10 124 40 E 10 162 34 B 9 112 26 F 9 88 24 B 10 Lost 36 F 10 105 23 C 9 125 30 G 9 124 24 C 10 74 19 G 10 125 24' D 9 103 29 D 10 88 26 W-2-A 9 111 25 E 9 136 28 A 10 88 32 E 10 111 25 B 9 118 21 F 9 88 24 B 10 106 35 F 10 126 24 C 9 84 22 G 9 113 25 C 10 101 25 G 10 137 '27 D 9 103 30 D 10 Lost Y-4-A 9 175 37 E 9 100 24 A 10 88 28 E 10 125 25 B 9 103 26 F 9 102 24 B 10 141 27 F 10 114 26 C 9 139 25 G 9 96 16 C 10 103 24 G 10 92 21 D 9 135 38 D 10 55 22 X-l-A 9 124 25 E 9 107 24 A 10 130 25 E 10 88 38 B 9 114 20 F 9 116 20 B C 10 9 125 121 24 23 F G c 10 9 10 52 80 62 31 24 48 C 10 108 19 D 9 107 36 Z-l-A 9 121 20 D 10 101 17 A 10 137 66 E 9 151 36 B 9 88 23 E 10 144 23 B 10 90 26 F 9 131 26 C 9 83 42 F 10 123 20 C 10 105 34 G 9 96 20 D 9 112 23 G 10 128 20 D 10 101 20 E 9 99 26 X-3-A 9 68 32 E 10 107 20 A 10 88 18 F 9 76 23 B 9 62 21 F 10 112 20 B 10 74 27 G 9 90 27 C 9 60 24 G 10 157 17 C 10 65 22 D 9 65 26 D 10 102 20 APPENDIX I 60S TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— CIDER— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — N — iMg. per Tin Kg. -^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Iron W-l-A 9 6 to Lost X-3-E 9 89 38 A 10 110 27 E 10 38 20 B i) 86 27 F 9 77 24 B 10 76 27 F 10 77 24 C 9 117 19 G 10 92 23 c 10 99 23 G 10 99 23 D 9 123 22 D 10 120 26 Y-l-A 9 95 30 E 9 120 21 A 10 123 36 E 10 190 22 B 9 165 36 F 9 102 23 B 10 74 25 F 10 89 22 C 9 60 25 G 9 106 31 C 10 111 33 G 10 104 34 D 9 79 29 D 10 63 23 W-2-A 9 104 28 E 9 91 22 A 10 118 14 F 10 Lost 27 B 9 86 16 F 9 90 20 B 10 100 20 F 10 Lost 22 C 9 83 12 G 9 106 17 C 10 105 21 G 10 67 22 D 9 108 15 D 10 103 18 Y-4-A 9 183 34 E 9 80 22 A 10 179 60 E 10 99 21 B 9 86 29 F 9 102 19 B 10 134 23 F 10 126 25 C 9 166 30 G 9 91 21 C 10 64 22 G 10 69 23 D 9 76 23 D 10 70 24 X-l-A 9 173 35 E 9 54 29 A 10 127 31 E 10 83 23 B 9 92 21 F 9 78 24 B 10 106 Lost F 10 100 20 C 9 78 22 G 9 86 22 C 10 112 21 G 10 86 22 D 9 84 23 D 10 123 18 Z-l-A 9 51 23 E 9 147 20 A 10 71 56 E 10 109 34 B 9 60 24 F 9 118 24 B 10 74 27 F 10 , 162 C 9 72 26 G 9 81 16 C 10 108 33 G 10 11 16 D 9 119 24 D 10 100 18 X-3-A 9 96 21 E 9 100 23 A 10 90 39 ' E 10 71 23 B 9 91 27 F 9 61 25 B 10 109 24 F 10 85 23 C 9 78 19 G 9 82 24 C 10 81 19 G 10 104 19 D 9 106 18 D 10 54 21 606 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— CLAM JUICE First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot Can No. Tin per Kg. — , Iron Lot Can No. Tin per Kg-. — x Iron W-l-A 1 15 8 Y-l-A 1 17 7 B 1 17 6 B 1 15 7 C 1 25 14 C 1 19 8 D 1 22 7 D 1 26 10 E 1 22 7 E 1 23 F 1 20 7 F 1 21 10 G 1 19 7 G 1 27 7 W-2-A 1 27 12 Y-l-A 1 17 7 B 1 18 8 B 1 18 8 C 1 22 7 G 1 22 8 D 1 21 6 D 1 20 8 E 1 19 8' E 1 15 6 F 1 19 7 F 1 20 7 G 1 26 7 G 1 18 5 X-l-A 1 15 7 Z-l-A 1 9 8 B 1 17 7 B 1 12 7 C 1 19 7 C 1 13 7 D 1 25 11 1) 1 19 6 E 1 20 9 E 1 15 6 F 1 26 13 F 1 22 7 G 1 16 9 G 1 17 i X-3-A 1 20 7 B 1 19 7 C 1 18 IV 1 D 1 22' 8 E 1 19 9 F 1 22 8 G 1 22 9 APPENDIX I 607 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— CLAM JUICE— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — N r-Mg. per Kg. — s Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 3 17 4 Y-l -A 3 23 5 B 3 24 15 B 3 21 6 C 3 18 4 C 3 21 4 D 3 16 5 D 3 21 4 E 3 18 6 E 3 33 4 F 3 20 5 F 3 17 5 G o 20 5 G 3 25 4 W-2-A 3 • 15 5 Y-4 -A 3 21 5 B 3 29 10 B 3 20 14 C 3 16 5 C 3 24 5 D 3 27 4 D 3 20 4 E 21 4 E 3 21 4 F 3 23 4 F 3 19 5 G 3 23 5 G 3 23 5 X-l-A 3 18 4 Z-l -A 3 21 6 B 3 21 5 U ','■> 19 5 C 3 28 11 (' '•> 19 5 D 3 21 5 JJ y, 23 5 E 3 22 5 K 3 27 5 F 3 18 6 F -> 25 5 G 3 22 5 G ;; 26 5 X-3-A 3 22 5 B 3 17 4 C 3 29 6 D 3 18 5 E Tin Iron Lot Can No. r- Mg. Tin per Kg. — > Iron W-l-A 10 5 9 Y-l-A 19 5 8 B 20 4 8 B 18 4 9 C 10 4 9 C 18 4 8 D 41 3 9 D 17 4 7 E 20 4 6 E IS 4 6 F 19 4 • 9 F 18 4 6 G 40 4 9 G 18 4 8 W-2-A 17 4 9 Y-4-A 17 4 7 B 20 4 9 B 18 4 6 C 17 4 50 C 19 4 5 D 19 6 8 D 19 4 12 E 16 4 10 E 20 4 7 F 19 4 9 F 18 4 7 G 20 3 7 G IS 4 7 X-l-A 19 3 8 Z-l-A 19 4 8 B 19 6 7 B ]9 3 7 C 18 3 8 C 20 4 7 D 19 5 8 D 19 3 8 E 18 4 8 E 19 3 7 F 18 4 IV 1 p 19 3 9 G 19 6 8 G 17 4 11 X-3-A 20 4 7 B 19 5 8 C 17 4 9 D 20 5 7 E 19 4 8 F 20 4 IV 1 G 20 5 7 APPENDIX I 617 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MAINE CORN (Stored on Side)— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 Lot , Mg. Tin per Kg. — S Iron Composite A 7 13 Composite A 7 15 Composite B 7 13 Composite B 7 13 Composite C 6 13 Composite C Lost Lost Composite D 7 12 Lot Composite D Composite E Composite E Composite F Composite F Composite G Composite G Mg. per Kg. ,, Tin Iron 7 13 8 10 15 10 6 11 7 11 7 11 8 11 618 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— CONDENSED MILK First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — ^ Iron Lot Can No. r- Mff. Tin per Kg. — v Iron W-l-A 1 5 2 Y-l-A 1 6 4 B 1 6 2 B 1 5 4 C 1 6 2 C 1 4 4 D 1 3 2 D 1 4 3 E 1 3 8 E 1 4 4 F 1 4 1 F 1 6 4 G 1 3 1 G 1 12 4 W-2-A 1 7 1 Y-4-A 1 5 3 B 1 4 1 B 1 5 1 C 1 Lost Lost C 1 7 7 D 1 4 1 D 1 7 4 E 1 Lost Lost E 1 8 4 F .1 3 2 F 1 5 2 G 1 3 2 G 1 6 4 X-l-A 1 9 7 Z-l-A 1 5 2 B 1 4 3 B 1 5 1 C 1 4 3 C 1 4 2 D 1 Lost 1 D 1 3 1 E 1 5 1 E 1 4 1 F 1 5 1 F 1 4 2 G 1 5 1 G 1 Lost 1 X-3-A 1 5 1 B 1 5 1 C 1 4 1 D 1 6 1 E 1 4 6 F 1 5 1 G 1 5 2 APPENDIX I 619 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— CONDENSED MILK— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 Lot Composite A Composite B Composite C Composite D Mg. per Kg\ N Tin Iron 12 9 14 9 11 9 22 8 Lot Composite E Composite F Composite G Mg-. per Kg-. ^ Tin Iron 14 10 21 9 18 9 620 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— EVAPORATED MILK First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot Can No. ,— Mg\ per Kg. —a Tin Iron Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — N Iron W-l-A 1 Lost Lost Y-l-A 1 24 3 B 1 86 3 B 1 69 3 C 1 62 3 C 1 66 1 D 1 52 3 D 1 74 1 E 1 77' 2 E 1 74 1 F 1 hS 3 F 1 Lost Lost G 1 58 2 p G 1 49 1 W-2-A 1 62 3 Y- -4-A 1 77 2 B 1 64 3 B 1 87 3 C 1 82 3 C 1 74 1 d' 1 80 5 D 1 52 1 E 1 82 2 E 1 60 1 F 1 54 2 F 1 56 1 G 1 52 3 G 1 49 1 X-l-A 1 66 2 Z-l-A 1 56 Lost B 1 92 4 B 1 88 Lost C 1 78 3 C 1 Lost Lost D 1 93 2 D 1 Lost Lost E 1 62 3 E 1 76 1 F 1 78 2 * F 1 73 1 G 1 84 3 G 1 75 Lost X-3-A 1 76 3 B 1 60 3 C 1 58 3 D 1 65 2 E 1 79 3 F 1 82 3 G 1 62 3 APPENDIX I 621 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— EVAPORATED MILK— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 i— Mg. per Kg. -^ ,— Mg. per Kg. — N Lot Can No. Tin Iron ' Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 5 78 3 Y-l-A 5 196 4 B 6 80 4 B 5 94 4 C 5 76 5 C 5 90 4 D 5 76 3 D 5 74 7 E 5 84 4 E 5 82 5 F 5 Lost 4 F 5 82 4 G 5 74 4 G 5 84 5 W-2-A 5 90 3 Y-4-A 5 96 5 B 5 76 . 6 B 5 116 4 C 5 72 4 C 5 94 5 D 5 94 5 D 5 94 5 E 5 Lost 4 E 5 76 6 F 5 74 4 F 5 68 4 G 5 76 4 G 5 84 5 X-l-A 5 94 5 Z-l-A 5 84 5 B 5 114 4 B 5 80 6 C 5 92 6 C 5 84 3 D 5 90 6 D 5 90 4 E 5 78 4 E 5 78 4 F 5 96 4 F 5 86 5 G 5 102 4 G 5 72 4 X-3-A 5 104 3 B . 5 82 4 C 5 90 4 D 5 82 4 E 5 88 4 F 5 90 8 G 5 80 8 622 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— EVAPORATED MILK— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 ,-Mgr. per Kg. — x r-M?. per Kg. — x Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 1 76 Lost X-3-E 1 84 5 A 2 84 Lost E 2 90 5 B 1 66 4 F 1 84 5 B 2 118 3 F 2 128 4 C 1 56 3 G 1 62 5 c 2 108 5 G 2 112 5 D 1 66 4 D 2 62 3 \ r -l-A 1 108 5 E 1 94 5 A 2 94 4 E 2 116 6 B 1 96 5 F 1 78 5 B 2 78 5 F 2 102 5 C 1 Lost 4 G 1 80 5 C 2 96 4 G 2 Lost D 1 108 4 D 2 70 4 W-2-A 1 104 4 E 1 90 4 A 2 112 6 E 2 92 4 B 1 6 F 1 80 5 B 2 72 6 F 2 88 6 C 1 80 4 G 1 92 5 C 2 108 5 G 2 86 5 D 1 92 5 * D 2 88 4 Y-4-A 1 96 5 E 1 90 6 A 2 116 5 E 2 98 5 B 1 122 4 F 1 72 4 B 2 126 5 F 2 78 12 C 1 92 5 G 1 62 4 C 2 98 Lost G 2 86 5 D 1 42 5 D 2 78 4 X-l-A 1 86 5 E 1 78 5 A 2 100 8 E 2 80 7 B 1 80 5 F 1 80 5 B 2 126 6 F 2 Lost C 1 68 4 G 1 72 4 C 2 96 5 G 2 84 4 D 1 66 5 D 2 78 3 Z-l-A 1 78 5 E 1 58 5 A 2 82 Lost E 2 102 5 B 1 84 4 F 1 100 5 B 2 108 4 F 2 108 4 C 1 76 4 G 1 156 8 C 2 84 4 G 2 136 4 D 1 92 4 D 2 116 4 X-3-A 1 122 5 E 1 90 5 A 2 130 4 E 2 98 3 B 1 104 5 F' 1 96 4 B 2 108 6 F 2 104 4 C 1 74 5 G 1 72 4 C 2 60 5 G 2 56 4 D n 78 5 D 2 124 5 APPENDIX I 623 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— PEAS First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 r—Mg\ per Kg-. — N r— Mg\ per Kg. — ^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 1 13 41 Y-l-A 1 20 33 B 1 14 46 B 1 12 20 C 1 10 Lost C 1 17 25 D 1 9 34 D 1 13 24 E 1 Lost 30 E 1 21 30 F 1 14 30 F 1 16 16 G 1 15 40 G 1 19 28 W-2-A 1 13 38 Y-4-A 1 9 28 B 1 14 38 B 1 11 24 C 1 11 38 v_. 1 11 HO D 1 16 33 D 1 14 18 E 1 11 32 E 1 10 18 F 1 38 38 F 1 13 23 G 1 16 33 G 1 18 25 X-l-A 1 9 38 Z-l-A 1 18 30 B 1 14 33 B 1 21 24 C 1 18 30 C 1 15 35 D 1 15 25 D 1 13 27 E 1 16 23 E 1 24 17 F 1 18 30 F 1 43 24 G 1 27 28 G 1 19 2ti X-3-A 1 32 32 B 1 20 30 C 1 16 32 D 1 20 30 E 1 14 30 F 1 11 33 G 1 24 52 624 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— PEAS— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 r- Mg. per Kg. -^ , — Mg\ per Kg. -^ Lot Can No. Tin li-on Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 19 26 30 X-3-E 19 Lost 24 A 20 14 32 E 20 Lost 26 B 19 14 32 F 19 Lost 22 B 20 15 28 F 20 23 20 C ' 19 24 36 G 19 21 40 C 20 22 26 G 20 15 24 D 19 19 22 D 20 24 19 Y-l-A 19 13 26 E 19 27 54 A 20 14 30 E 20 • 15 23 B 19 16 20 F 19 21 22 B 20 13 22 F 20 23 24 C 19 14 20 G 19 26 28 C 20 Lost 20 G 20 18 54 D 19 Lost 20 D 20 Lost 20 W-2-A 19 15 32 E 19 Lost 13 A 28 14 30 E 20 17 15 B 19 14 30 F 19 18 15 B 20 18 26 F 20 28 12 C 19 14 .28 G 19 24 17 C 20 Lost G 20 18 16 D 19 13 28 &> D 20 18 28 Y-4-A 19 18 28 E 19 25 24 A 20 16 24 E 20 19 28 B 19 22 24 F 19 Lost 18 B 20 14 18 F 20 Lost 46 C 19 14 19 G 19 Lost 30 C 20 11 22 G 20 Lost D 19 14 20 D 20 Lost 20 X-l-A 19 Lost E 19 Lost 20 A 20 12 32 E 20 Lost 20 B 19 15 Lost F 19 19 23 B 20 Lost F 20 12 20 C 19 17 24 G 19 17 18 C 20 15 26 G 20 14 17 D 19 17 22 D 20 28 22 Z-l-A 19 15 20 E 19 10 24 A 20 Lost E 20 13 26 B 19 17 20 F 19 21 16 B 20 18 20 F 20 21 20 C 19 29 20 G 19 19 20 C 20 30 18 G 20 21 24 D 19 20 30 D 20 19 16 X-3-A 19 Lost 32 E 19 22 18 A 20 Lost 30 E 20 16 18 B 19 Lost 30 F 19 26 16 B 20 21 32 F 20 23 16 C 19 21 24 G 19 26 11 C 20 17 22 G 20 18 19 D 19 20 34 D 20 Lost 22 APPENDIX I 625 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— ILLINOIS PUMPKIN First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — N Iron Lol Can No. ,— Mgf. Tin per Kg-. — N Iron W-l-A 21 53 17 Y-l -A 21 Lost Lost B 21 77 20 B 21 64 20 C 23 83 20 C 22 86 20 D 23 89 • 19 D 21 119 19 E 21 109 18 E 21 148 19 F 23 161 20 F 21 153 18 G 13 161 17 G 22 194 20 W-2-A 13 82 20 Y-4 -A 21 74 21 B 13 208 22 B 21 76 20 C 21 90 20 C 22 135 19 D 21 129 20 D 22 115 21 E 21 150 23 E 22 148 18 F 23 177 29 F 21 138 19 G 22 172 26 G 20 180 20 X-l-A 21 69 23 Z-l -A 22 68 17 B 23 65 20 B 14 101 19 C 15 129 23 C 22 81 19 D 22 179 18 D 22 125 19 E 22 144 20 E 21 134 24 F 21 139 20 F 23 172 Lost G 21 166 20 G 22 164 18 X-3-A 13 66 19 B 21 70 19 C 23 107 21 D 23 96 19 E 21 143 18 F 22 216 21 G 21 159 21 626 APPENDIX I ,LINOIS i PUMPKIr> f — Continued :ion, February 1, 1916 Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — Iron Y-l-A 18 130 25 B 23 126 Lost C 19 224 28 D 22 292 23 E 20 256 23 F 19 310 25 G 20 205 22 Y-4-A 20 124 26 B 18 133 30 C 18 248 26 D 20 272 22 E 20 294 27 F 16 291 26 G 18 336 25 Z-l-A 20 134 27 B 20 252 26 C 18 153 24 D 20 194 25 E 18 208 24 F 20 232 26 G 19 314 25 r-Mg. per Kg. — Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 23 113 23 B 23 148 22 C 20 190 20 D 19 242 18 E 20 260 18 F 20 299 18 G 15 354 Lost W-2-A 15 187 22 B 15 362 21 C 19 229 20 D 23 262 22 E 18 288 22 F 21 Lost G 18 338 20 X-l-A 17 106 22 B 21 180 20 C 13 335 23 D 18 Lost E 20 219 19 F 19 273 24 G 23 304 27 X-3-A 22 147 24 B 23 154 26 C 20 267 30 D 18 246 28 E 22 Lost 23 F 18 414 25 G 17 313 40 APPENDIX I 627 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— ILLINOIS PUMPKIN— Continued Third Washington Inspection , April 10, 1916 Lot Can Nc i. Tin per Kg 1 . — s Iron Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — \ Iron W-l-A 18 144 26 X-3 -E 18 400 21 A 17 151 24 E 17 560 18 B 18 258 22 F 18 601 19 B 17 205 F 17 369 19 C is 278 23 G • 18 Lost 20 C 17 197 19 G 9 417 20 D 18 328 23 D 17 421 22 Y-l -A 14 146 20 E 18 365 20 A 13 144 23 E 17 366 18 B 18 179 20 F 18 409 20 B 17 300 15 F IT 445 22 C 18 339 27 G 18 312 22 C 17 274 24 G 17 409 20 D D 18 17 355 304 Lost 21 W-2-A 18 256 19 E 18 392 26 A 17 250 22 E 17 442 32 B 19 416 23 F 18 411 23 B 18 428 26 F 17 361 23 C 18 280 21 G 18 499 26 C 17 310 20 G 17 483 27 D 18 345 24 D 17 312 23 Y-4 -A 18 183 27 E 17 376 30 A 17 439 25 E 1-1- 361 24 B 17 279 21 F lS 351 21 B 13 479 26 F 17 361 21 C 17 354 24 G 17 391 22 C 13 495 25 G 13 392 22 D D 17 13 453 387 24 30 X-l-A 16 185 21 E IS 434 27 A 15 217 19 E 17 350 23 B 18 304 20 F 14 431 24 B 17 258 15 F 13 237 24 C 18 389 24 G 17 410 24 C 17 379 19 G 13 196 23 D 17 497 23 D 13 467 23 Z-l -A 18 225 24 E 18 342 23 A 17 173 22 E 17 338 25 B 17 383 28 F 17 301 24 B 13 365 25 F 13 378 24 C 17 378 24 G 18 392 22 C 13 338 28 G 17 377 23 D D 18 17 365 343 30 21 X-3-A 18 203 21 E 19 367 20 A 17 199 18 E 17 428 21 B 16 286 23 F 18 396 25 B 15 324 21 F 17 418 23 C 18 373 22 G 18 431 26 C 17 351 15 G 17 154 18 D 19 344 18 D 17 369 21 628 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— ILLINOIS PUMPKIN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. —x r-Mg. per Kg. — N Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 19 313 20 X-3-E 19 457 26 A 20 329 22 E 20 519 24 B 19 333 20 F 21 711 24 B 20 254 20 F 23 764 26 C 19 337 22 G 19 489 28 C 21 323 20 G 20 468 22 D 20 427 20 D 24 386 20 Y-l-A 17 177 24 E 13 484 18 A 20 Lost 24 E 19 423 20 B 19 366 26 F 19 20 B 20 303 24 F 22 481 24 C 20 340 24 G 19 493 22 C 24 376 22 G 20 486 20 D 19 424 22 D 20 386 24 W-2-A 19 321 20 E 19 473 24 A 20 321 18 E 24 Lost 22 B 22 505 20 F 23 469 24 B 23 414 20 F 24 473 24 C 20 384 50 G 19 582 22 C 23 322 22 G 23 594 24 D 19 392 22 *> D 20 380 20 Y-4-A 19 294 20 E 19 457 24 A 23 304 20 E 20 439 22 B 19 331 22 F 19 442 22 • B 23 352 24 F 20 463 22 C 19 363 22 G 19 551 Lost C 21 439 20 G 20 505 22 D 18 428 22 D 19 453 29 X-l-A 19 283 28 E 19 484 24 A 20 264 24 E 23 452 23 B 19 355 40 F 15 510 23 B 20 343 20 F 17 423 23 C 19 432 23 G 21 506 25 C 20 507 24 G 22 520 25 D 19 519 21 D 20 550 Lost Z-l-A 19 290 25 E 19 194 24 A 22 275 25 E 21 303 25 B 22 506 40 F 18 340 20 B 23 442 23 F 20 257 23 C 19 427 26 G 19 441 20 C 21 376 23 G 20 430 .23 D 19 490 21 D 23 440 21 X-3-A 19 261 23 E 23 509 24 A 20 251 23 E 24 486 21 B 19 362 25 F 19 465 21 B 20 392 25 F 22 512 21 C 4 460 25 G 21 516 27 C 22 447 24 G 23 519 21 D 20 491 24 D 21 435 22 APPENDIX I 629 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— ILLINOIS PUMPKIN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 r- Mg. pe: ' Kg.^ r-Mg. per Kg. — N Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 11 315 19 X-3-D 10 472 Lost A 12 342 23 E 7 428 Lost B 11 228 23 E 12 400 16 B 12 360 19 F 1 658 24 C 9 558 27 F 3 584 21 C 10 504 21 G 2 444 24 D 11 434 22 G 4 626 21 D 12 4G3 17 E IV i 556 17 Y-l-A 9 248 26 E 10 414 14 A 11 244 24 F 656 14 B 1 320 26 F 12 526 13 B 5 405 26 G 5 566 14 C 3 414 25 G 9 386 8 C 4 406 25 D 1 502 26 W-2-A 2 348 13 D 11 504 25 A 4 538 16 E 9 526 25 B 4 446 6 E 11 524 26 B 12 526 13 F 3 616 23 C 3 342 8 F 4 Lost C 4 294 8 G 2 688 27 D 11 400 7 G 11 676 24 D 12 432 12 E 3 300 10 Y-4-A A. 282 14 E t 552 9 A 12 302 29 F 2 292 15 B 1 356 25 F 11 524 Lost B 2 452 28 G 4 12 C 3 346 21 G I 436 Lost C 4 376 28 D 1 462 25 X-l-A 1 - 382 18 D 2 506 27 A 9 208 16 E 9 470 28 B 8 426 Lost E 10 570 28 B 11 284 Lost F 5 472 25 C 4 344 Lost F 12 543 28 C 12 264 Lost G 2 .496 27 D 5 556 Lost G 9 516 25 D 10 670 Lost E 2 440 Lost Z-l-A 9 334 32 E 9 536 Lost A 11 222 28 F 11 462 Lost B 8 506 26 F 12 336 Lost B 12 438 28 G o O 542 Lost C 1 458 28 G 9 504 Lost C 5 444 Lost D 5 444 28 X-3-A o O 348 Lost D 7 448 26 A 11 280 Lost E 9 412 26 B 4 102 Lost E 10 524 26 B 8 432 Lost F 1 454 24 C 2 Lost F 2 538 26 C 8 516 Lost G 3 504 26 D 8 592 Lost G 4 566 26 630 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— ILLINOIS PUMPKIN— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — s r-Mg. per Kg. — ^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 5 286 26 X-3-E 4 628 24 A 9 308 24 E 8 706 24 B 9 368 24 F 11 982 22 B 10 386 26 F 12 776 24 C 5 530 24 G 6 648 24 C 6 498 22 G 7 628 30 D 9 472 24 D 10 432 20 Y-l-A 8 330 26 E 8 388 22 A 10 322 28 E 9 594 24 B 9 374 26 F 9 600 20 B 10 484 20 F 11 596 24 C 7 410 20 G 2 532 26 C 8 522 26 G 10 558 24 D 2 540 26 D 3 528 22 W-2-A 2 218 24 E 6 624 22 A 3 368 24 E 7 656 24 B 7 482 24 F 8 694 24 B 8 516 24 F 9 648 24 C 9 630 30 G 9 820 32 C 8 382 24 G 10 824 22 D 4 378 22 D 8 396 22 Y-4-A 7 348 24 E 11 590 22 A 11 346 26 E 12 968 B 6 350 28 F 6 688 22 B 9 344 38 F 10 628 18 C 10 410 G 11 650 26 C 12 496 26 G 12 694 20 D 5 518 22 D 9 554 24 X-l-A 2 376 30 E 2 596 22 A 3 362 26 E 6 508 20 B 3 450 26 F 1 632 26 B 4 506 22 F 4 630 22 C 7 608 42 G 1 698 22 C 8 506 24 G 3 688 24 D 1 690 22 D 9 700 24 Z-l-A 5 318 30 E 5 572 . 20 A 8 . . E 10 498 24 B 1 698 24 F 3 556 24 B 2 568 18 F 7 602 24 C 2 506 26 G 1 614 42 C 3 574 26 G 10 624 22 D 1 646 24 D 2 514 24 X-3-A 416 4/r*i E 1 664 26 A 12 342 26 E 2 690 24 B 11 474 26 F 4 604 36 B 12 456 28 F 7 694 24 C 1 508 32 G 6 642 24 C 5 560 24 G 8 680 22 D 5 624 28 D 6 650 24 APPENDIX I 631 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MICHIGAN PUMPKIN First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot Can No. r— Mg. Tin per Kg. — v Iron Lot Can No. , — Mg\ per Tin Kg. -^ Iron W-l-A 1 68 13 Y-l-A 1 64 20 B 1 66 IS B 1 70 20 C 1 80 17 C 1 79 20 D 1 84 15 D 1 81 21 E 1 67 14 E 1 Lost 21 F 1 80 20 F 1 110 24 G 1 89 30 G 1 104 25 W-2-A 1 74 13 Y-4-A 1 67 24 B 1 78 19 B 1 75 23 C 1 73 15 C 1 77 23 D 1 83 19 D 1 79 25 E 1 75 18 E 1 80 21 F 1 73 15 F 1 78 19 G 1 110 20 G 1 91 29 X-l-A 1 58 20 Z-l-A 1 55 18 B 1 77 20 B 1 60 26 C 1 75 21 C 1 73 27 D 1 73 18 D 1 67 25 E 1 87 21 E 1 67 29 F 1 93 20 F 1 76 17 G 1 110 20 G 1 66 27 X-3-A . 1 76 18 B 1 71 18 C 1 85 20 D 1 81 18 E 1 76- 19 F 1 91 20 G 1 101 17 632 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MICHIGAN PUMPKIN— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot W-l-A B C D E F G Can No. 3 o O 3 3 3 3 3 Mg. per Kg. — Iron 18 Tin 103 102 151 192 134 127 187 20 21 20 21 20 26 Lot Y-l-A B C D E F G Can No. 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Tin 128 122 143 125 145 160 & /L & Mg-. per Kg. — Iron 25 31 30 29 29 30 29 W-2-A B C D E F 3 113 3 115 3 130 3 138 3 194 3 156 3 232 21 22 23 21 25 26 24 Y-4-A B C D E F G 110 140 166 147 127 181 181 28 31 27 42 33 33 Lost X-l-A 102 26 B 3 127 24 C 3 129 26 D 3 132 23 E 3 127 23 F 3 130 22 G o O 214 21 X-3-A 3 104 23 B 3 127 26 C 3 Lost 23 D 3 137 20 E 3 138 25 F 3 183 23 G • 3 246 40 Z-l-A B C D E F G 87 Lost 132 144 220 125 138 27 26 36 30 27 APPENDIX I 633 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MICHIGAN PUMPKIN— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — N r-Mg. per Kg. — -, Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 6 112 50 X-3-E 6 203 22 A 389 22 E 5 211 20 B 6 186 17 F 6 237 23 B 5 204 18 F 5 221 24 C 6 235 19 G 6 308 23 C 5 225 16 G 5 297 23 D 6 215 19 D 5 288 16 Y-l-A 6 189 24 E 6 249 18 A 5 156 24 E 5 215 16 B 6 F 6 257 21 B 5 165 24 F 5 249 17 C 6 180 23 G 6 275 18 C 5 160 24 G 5 259 19 D 6 179 29 D 5 212 26 W-2-A 6 160 19 E 6 231 28 A 5 203 19 E 5 30 B 6 211 20 F 6 257 26 B 5 181 21 F 5 284 27 C 6 153 20 G 6 300 29 C 5 194 18 G 5 295 30 D 6 279 20 D 5 213 20 Y-4-A 6 155 30 E 6 307 20 A 5 215 31 E 5 211 20 B 6 ■ 220 27 F 6 293 21 B 5 256 23 F 5 285 22 C 6 278 26 G 6 302 23 C 5 302 27 G 5 309 20 D 6 270 33 D 5 272 34 X-l-A 6 133 26 E 6 271 30 A 5 153 25 E 5 237 31 B 6 166 26 F 6 294 31 B 5 174 24 F 5 Lost 30 C 6 184 27 G 6 263 30 C 5 186 22 G 5 284 36 D 6 Lost 29 D 5 220 27 Z-l-A 6 140 31 E 6 296 25 . A 5 127 39 E 5 222 23 B 6 201 25 F 6 279 21 B 5 187 25 F 5 220 24 C 6 259 40 G 6 320 22 C 5 203 30 G 5 292 20 D 6 292 28 D 5 179 30 X-3-A 6 172 23 E 6 343 28 A 5 151 24 E 5 351 30 B 6 141 23 F 6 231 28 B 5 162 24 F 5 279 28 C 6 246 25 G 6 339 32 C 5 179 23 G 5 317 30 D 6 192 23 • D 5 218 30 634 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MICHIGAN PUMPKIN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A i 164 17 A 8 166 19 B 7 215 18 B 8 162 16 C 7 287 22 C 8 230 24 D 7 349 16 D 8 340 19 E 7 266 14 E 8 218 16 F 7 264 16 F 8 301 18 G 7 ' 339 20 G 8 316 Lost W-2-A 7 182 22 A, 8 163 24 B 7 218 20 B 8 190 23 C 7 238 21 C 8 247 17 D 7 309 18 D 8 282 24 E 7 380 22 E 8 304 20 F 7 373 19 F 8 308 27 G ■ 7 375 25 G 8 377 26 X-l-A 7 155 24 A 8 183 24 B 7 203 22 B 8 226 20 C 7 Lost 18 C 8 220 21 D 7 251 22 D 8 276 25 E 7 299 24 E 8 204 26 F 7 289 24 F 8 293 25 G 7 386 21 G 8 374 21 X-3-A 7 204 23 A 8 208 25 B 7 195 26 B 8 247 24 C 7 329 26 C 8 272 26 D 7 264 26 D 8 262 *54 ■ Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. - Iron X-3-E 7 308 27 E 8 287 24 F 7 235 26 F 8 327 27 G 7 404 26 G 8 465 28 Y-l-A 7 231 30 A 8 236 28 B 7 270 37 B 8 227 29 C 7 234 23 C 8 264 24 D 7 293 26 D 8 308 29 E m # E F F G G •• Y-4-A A m m B 7 262 24 B 8 236 24 C 7 301 22 C 8 309 24 D 7 300 23 D 8 285 26 E 7 291 26 E 8 241 28 F 7 274 26 F 8 256 24 G 7 295 26 G 8 349 28 Z-l-A 7 170 22 A 8 138 23 B 7 173 25 B 8 155 26 C 7 236 23 C 8 210 26 D 7 273 22 D 8 301 24 E 7 314 25 E 8 347 36 F 7 265 21 F 8 208 20 G 7 329 25 G 8 347 24 APPENDIX I 635 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MICHIGAN PUMPKIN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 r~Mg. per Kg. — ^ r-Mg. per Kg - . — ^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 9 191: 24 X-3-E 9 256 20 A 10 182 24 E 10 258 20 B i) 191 22 F 9 330 22 B 10 220 24 F 10 316 20 C 9 274 22 G 9 352 20 C 10 346 22 G 10 390 22 D 9 172 28 D 10 372 34 Y-l-A 9 286 26 E 9 304 . 22 A 10 352 30 E 10 Lost 22 B 9 210 28 F 9 352 22 B 10 rJ/O/C 28 F 10 412 18 C 9 232 32 G 9 454 20 C 10 214 26 G 10 478 22 D 9 236 26 D 10 258 28 VV-2-A 9 206 22 E 9 352 28 A 10 210 22 E 10 274 26 B 9 286 24 F 9 380 32 B 10 294 24 F 10 282 28 C 9 308 22 G 9 246 26 C 10 300 22 G 10 268 30 D 9 318 20 D 10 312 24 Y-l-A 9 170 30 E 9 424 24 A 10 152 32 E 10 372 24 B 9 198 28 F 9 492 24 B 10 210. 32 F 10 372 26 C 9 272 32 G 9 482 24 C 10 306 30 G 10 464 24 D 9 174 32 D 10 154 32 X-l-A • 9 178 28 E 9 256 36 A 10 224 30 E 10 244 36 B 9 236 26 F 9 216 28 B 10 240 28 F 10 214 22 C 9 264 28 G 9 214 46 C 10 266 26 G 10 290 24 D 9 280 24 D 10 328 26 Z-l-A 9 132 34 E 9 206 28 A 10 116 36 E 10 416 24 B 9 192 26 F 9 372 24 B 10 134 24 F 10 408 26 C 9 236 28 G 9 378 26 C 10 Lost 28 G 10 432 26 D 9 284 36 D 10 206 30 X-3-A 9 290 28 E 9 152 26 A 10 220 24 E 10 280 28 B 9 236 24 F 9 282 28 B 10 234 26 F 10 300 26 C 9 244 26 G 9 452 28 C 10 220 24 G 10 438 36 D 9 248 22 D 10 212 22 636 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MICHIGAN PUMPKIN— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — , r-Mg. per Kg. — s Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 11 222 22 X-3-E 1 ! 356 20 A 12 98 20 E 12 544 26 B 11 206 16 F 11 562 20 B 12 260 16 F 12 496 28 C 11 374 22 G 11 484 28 C 12 430 21 G 12 568 24 D 11 422 20 D 12 602 20 Y-l-A 11 314 30 E 11 428 17 A 12 276 24 E 12 423 18 B 11 272 24 F 11 398 19 B 12 260 28 F 12 398 20 C 11 296 22 G 11 480 20 C 12 346 22 G 12 476 20 D 11 444 26 D 12 312 32 W-2-A 11 286 20 E 11 392 30 A 12 254 21 E 12 354 34 B 11 266 20 F 11 398 30 B 12 204 21 F 12 398 30 C 11 252 IS G 11 624 26 C 12 294 21 G 12 462 2S D 11 320 20 ^ D 12 462 22 Y-4-A 11 222 28 E 11 412 21 A 12 256 30 E 12 466 21 B 11 317 32 F 11 516 25 B 12 396 32 F 12 530 22 C 11 418 28 G 11 454 23 C 12 406 28 G 12 470 24 D 11 342 30 D 12 366 28 X-l-A 11 222 36 E 11 384 30 A 12 476 33 E 12 272 Lost B 11 214 28 F 11 390 30 B 12 192 28 F 12 450 34 c 11 262 25 G 11 440 26 C 12 258 25 G 12 550 30 D 11 368 24 D 12 220 25 Z-l-A 11 242 30 . E 11 322 22 A 12 214 30 E 12 478 27 B 11 252 30 F 11 382 27 B 12 280 34 F 12 352 22 C 11 316 28 G 11 252 26 C 12 258 30 G 12 492 26 D 11 398 32 D 12 348 30 X-3-A 1 1 His E 11 368 28 A 1?, 258 24 E 12 432 34 B 11 366 28 F 11 444 30 B 12 364 26 F 12 376 Lost C 11 448 26 G 11 480 34 C 12 396 24 G 12 456 20 D 11 334 26 D 12 430 26 APPENDIX I 637 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW YORK PUMPKIN First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 Lot Can No. r— Mg. per Tin Kg. -, Iron Lot Can No. ,— Mgr. Tin per Kg. — N Iron W-l-A 21 66 18 Y-l -A 22 51 14 B 19 55 16 B 15 43 14 C 19 45 ' 15 C 13 42 13 D 19 45 14 D 1-! 41 14 E 19 45 16 E 13 32 14 F 18 37 17 F ' 13 43 15 G 19 49 15. G 14 Lost Lost W-2-A 16 44 15 Y-4-A 13 31 14 B 19 46 15 B 13 29 14 C IS 37 16 C 23 32 14 D ')-< 44 16 D Lost Lost E 19 49 16 E 23 43 18 F 16 38 16 F 23 31 16 G 21 41 15 G 22 37 15 X-l-A 15 35 14 Z-l -A 23 31 16 B 15 37 14 B 22 28 15 C 21 42 15 C 23 36 16 D * 15 46 13 D 23 28 14 E 21 40 13 E 19 31 15 F 21 49 14 F 18 38 16 G 15 64 14 G 23 54 15 X-3-A 13 50 14 B 12 42 14 C l(i 45 14 D 19 44 15 E 22 41 14 F 14 Lost Lost G 19 65 14 638 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW YORK PUMPKIN— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 , — Mg. per Kg. — ,, r-Mg-. per Kg. — ^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 20 50 22 Y-l-A 1!) 64 18 B 20 82 26- B 13 45 20 C 16 78 21 C 15 65 21 D 20 59 19 D 16 45 21 E 16 59 20 E 15 40 20 F 15 63 23 F 15 21 G 20 61 20 , G 13 65 20 W-2-A 20 91 21 Y-4-A 15 30 21 B 15 45 20 B 15 42 23 C 14 49 24 C 21 41 19 D 15 57 19 D 1 35 21 E 19 Lost 18 E 21 38 21 F 7 56 20 F 21 50 22 G 20 53 16 G 19 42 21 X-l-A 19 48 20 Z-l-A 21 39 21 B 14 46 17 B 20 41 19 C 13 Lost 20 C 20 43 17 D 18 57 in I) 19 31 * 23 E 17 44 20 E 21 39 21 F 20 58 19 F 20 53 19 G 21 24 G 1.8 136 19 X-3-A 17 57 20 B 19 53 20 C 14 58 21 D 20 53 20 E 19 46 21 F 13 67 19 18 Lost APPENDIX I 639 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW YORK PUMPKIN— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg\ — s r-Mg. per Kg-. -^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 14 77 IS X-3-E 15 61 20 A 13 110 19 E 14 62 17 B 17 101 22 F 18 76 15 B 16 70 20 F 16 75 18 C 14 131 17 G 15 256 18 C 12 92 17 G 14 300 17 D 14 74 14 D 13 66 15 Y-l-A 14 82 21 E 24 55 16 A 6 19 20 E 21 64 15 B )8 53 20 F 17 63 15 B 17 63 17 F 14 66 16 C 18 85 20 G 14 133 15 C 14 88 17 G 13 16 D 18 48 20 D 17 57 Lost W-2-A 17 95 16 E 18 42 17 A 14 82 16 E 17 47 20 B 17 86 16 E 18 43 18 B 14 71 15 F . 17 44 17 C 17 58 16 G 18 127 18 C 15 69 15 G 17 55 18 D 17 17 D 14 67 20 Y-4-A 18 18 E 17 64 19 A 17 49 15 E 14 77 20 B IS 44 18 F 17 54 17 B 17 53 18 F 11 55 17 C 18 56 16 G 15 58 15 C 17 46 15 G 14 63 15 D 18 45 15 D 17 44 15 X-l-A 14 52 17 E IS 46 18 A 13 48 18 E 17 52 15 B 17 54 15 F 18 39 16 B 13 90 14 F 17 39 19 C 18 65 16 G 18 60 16 C 14 66 Lost G 17 156 16 D 17 83 18 D 13 71 15 Z-l-A 18 31 18 E 20 58 17 A 17 48 18 E 19 68 16 B IS 46 17 F 24 76 21 B 17 42 18 F 17 80 20 C 18 56 19 G 17 316 20 C 17 56 19 G 14 323 18 D 17 42 18 D 16 51 21 X-3-A 20 150 20 E IS 44 18 A 14 148 20 E 17 46 22 B 17 76 18 F 18 57 19 B 14 74 18 F 17 66 19 C 23 85 18 G 20 294 17 C 17 68 20 G 17 326 18 D 17 73 16 D 13 72 16 640 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW YORK PUMPKIN— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 r-Mgr. per Kg. — ^ r-Mg. per Kg. — s Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 19 78 20 X-3-E n 58 18 A 24 86 24 E 20 67 16 B 13 73 20 F 22 283 16 B 18 116 21 F 23 149 16 C 23 142 24 G 16 334 16 C 17 135 22 G 24 305 14 D 16 120 20 D 17 99 35 Y-l-A 18 111 20 E 13 74 24 A 21 95 18 E 23 77 17 B 22 93 Lost F 20 106 25 B 24 81 18 F 23 94 15 C 18 112 18 G 16 161 16 C 20 71 16 G 21 188 32 D 13 51 16 D 20 52 16 W-2-A 21 155 15 E 19 54 16 A 23 162 22 E 20 44 16 B 20 130 19 F 19 70 16 B 23 64 29 F 20 68 18 C 20 91 27 G 19 214 14 C 23 71 Lost G 20 173 16 D 20 74 Lost D 23 67 50 Y-4-A 19 50 18 E 20 41 52 A 20 49 22 E 24 39 32 B 19 65 16 F 8 44 54 B 20 45 16 F 23 106 30 C 19 69 16 G 17 60 30 C 20 66 16 G 18 44 38 D D Lost Lost 16 X-l-A 16 40 46 E 19 62 16 A 21 41 46 E 20 53 16 B 18 47 36 F 19 177 Lost B 19 44 68 F 20 45 14 C 23 63 52 G 21 36 16 C 20 54 32 G 24 ■ 73 16 D 23 51 44 D 21 38 40 Z-l-A 19 49 18 E 23 52 44 A 20 46 16 E 21 49 38 B 19 49 16 F 18 104 32 B 24 49 16 F 19 50 30 C 19 56 16 G 24 209 30 C 22 70 16 G 23 203 36 D 13 73 16 D 22 58 18 X-3-A 23 184 40 E 20 49 16 A 24 193 40 E 24 65 18 B 23 93 36 F 23 75 B 24 106 34 F 24 83 .- C 20 105 36 G 21 344 C 22 109 34 G 22 303 D 14 57 20 D 16 88 18 APPENDIX I 641 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW YORK PUMPKIN— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 , — Mg. per Kg. -^ r-Mg. per Kg. -^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 11 G4 21 X-3-E 4 86 21 A 12 72 25 E 8 82 IS B 9 122 23 F 4 264 20 B 12 94 24 F 12 130 28 C 4 70 18 G 1 326 23 C 5 94 18 G 3 444 24 D 9 106 19 * D 12 128 16 Y-l-A 5 152 23 E 2 128 16 A 10 156 32 E 4 54 17 B 1 94 14 F 9 56 17 B 4 64 20 F 12 146 17 C 4 50 20 G 2 334 25 C 8 112 24 G 3 298 19 D 9 52 26 D 10 66 14 W-2-A 6 220 19 E 4 74 18 A 5 140 17 E 11 54 18 B 7 200 16 F 9 88 18 B 10 92 18 F 10 46 18 C 7 82 17 G rv 216 20 C 10 120 18 G 11 248 22 D 11 70 17 D 12 66 17 Y-4-A 7 196 20 E 9 84 17 A 8 48 18 E 12 106 14 B 1 52 20 F 2 70 17 B 2 52 28 F 3 80 19 G 2 98 24 G 1 220 15 C 6 46 24 G 4 250 25 D 9 78 22 D 10 92 16 X-l-A 1 42 19 E 9 78 14 A 5 .48 17 E 10 170 16 B 3 68 18 F 1 48 16 B 4 120 17 F 9 56 13 C 7 128 17 G 4 270 Lost C 11 60 17 G 12 158 14 D 3 48 19 D 4 52 16 Z-l-A 9 64 12 E 1 60 17 A 10 60 13 E 2 84 18 B 4 78 11 F 3 250 19 B 7- 90 7 F 4 85 16 C 2 114 11 G 10 102 16 G 4 78 14 G 11 108 72 D 1 88 18 D 2 56 13 X-3-A 9 280 17 E 3 38 16 A 12 158 18 E 4 66 15 B 3 128 19 F 1 92 13 B 5 60 13 F 9 158 Lost C 9 Lost 20 G 3 334 17 C 12 166 20 G 4 360 18 D 1 Lost 17 D 4 98 18 642 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW YORK PUMPKIN— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 r-MgV per Kg. — s ,— Mgr. per Kg\ — N Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No: Tin Iron W-l-A 1 88 24 X-3-E ■ > 218 20 A 5 88 24 E 7 86 14 B 7 140 26 F 9 90 16 , B 11 98 22 F 11 244 20 C < 150 20 G 5 474- 20 c 10 185 22 G 2 386 20 D 8 183 16 D 11 132 28 Y-l-A 4 178 18 E 5 198 20 A 6 162 24 E (i 98 20 B 2 170 20 F 8 154 26 B 3 128 22 F 11 310 18 C 3 185 22 G 4 224 16 C 11 184 20 G 5 276 20 D 1 56 20 D 5 80 20 W-2-A o O 188 16 E 7 70 20 A 11 148 18 E 12 68 16 B 8 128 30 F 5 112 18 B 11 178 16 F 6 160 18 C 9 156 16 G 6 310 18 C 12 152 18 G 9 218 20 D 9 86 18 D 10 164 18 Y-4-A 3 110 20 E 10 96 16 A 12 90 22 E 11 96 22 B 3 96 16 F 5 126 20 B 4 72 16 F 21 128 18 G 6 88 24 G 2 216 18 C 12 70 20 G 3 284 20 D 40 164 24 D 41 . 64 22 X-l-A 3 18 E 2 64 18 A 6 44 14 E 6- 92 20 B 7 76 20 F 5 98 20 B 8 88 18 F 11 60 24 C 3 116 18 G 7 174 26 C 8 110 20 G 11 258 24 D 8 88 16 D 12 136 20 Z-l-A 2 62 22 E 3 54 14 A 6 84 22 E 5 76 18 B 3 58 30 F 6 108 18 B 12 110 26 F 7 56 18 C 6 118 26 G 7 404 18 C 8 86 26 G 8 410 20 D 5 94 22 D 6 86 24 X-3-A 8 326 24 E 6 82 22 A 11 276 22 E 7 108 22 B 2 228 22 F • £ 110 20 B 6 140 20 F 8 190 26 C 8 168 18 G 7 414 22 C 11 204 20 G 11 424 16 D 3 92 32 D 5 194 22 APPENDIX I 643 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— INDIANA TOMATOES First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 r-Mg. per Kg. — s r-Mg. per Kg. — s Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Cai i No. Tin Iron W-l-A 1 88 13 Y-l-A 1 60 8 B 1 58 ' . 8 B 1 47 7 C 1 56 7 C 1" 46 5 D 1 46 7 D 1 54 6 E 1 46 7 E 1 43 5 F 1 45 6 F 1 46 • 4 G 1 39 7 G 1 53 7 W-2-A 1 175 26 Y-4-A 1 47 6 B 1 56 ■ 7 B 1 107 21 C 1 41 5 C 1 52 7 D 1 47 5 D 1 44 Lost E 1 77 6 E 1 • 57 7 F ] 44 5 F 1 46 9 G 1 49 5 G 1 51 8 X-l-A 1 101 23 Z-l-A 1 . 57 ry B 1 55 6 B 1 67 8 C 1 50 7 C 1 51 8 D 1 48 7 D 1 43 7 E 1 54 8 E J 48 8 F 1 83 8 F 1 46 6 G 1 44 6 G 1 54 6 X-3-A 1 42 7 B 1 Lost Lost C 1 55 7 D 1 46 i • E 1 50 8 F 1 48 7 G 1 48 7 644 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— INDIANA TOMATOES— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — N Iron Lot Can No. r-Mg. Tin per Kg. — N Iron W-l-A 3 110 29 Y-l-A 3 57 8 B 3 50 6 B 3 57 7 C 3 53 6 C 3 62 6 D 3 50 5 D 3 45 5 E 3 43 6 E 3 64 6 F -3 43 6 F 3 46 6 G 3 56 5 G 3 59 W-2-A 3 54 7 Y-4-A 3 51 B 3 100 6 B C D E F G X-l-A 3 127 19 Z-l-A B 3 124 11 B C D E F G c 3 69 6 D 3 52 5 E 3 60 7 F 3 49 6 G 3 44 5 C 3 52 7 D '6 76 7 E 3 50 6 F 3 62 7 G 3 60 6 A 3 43 Los B 3 65 9 C 3 65 7 D 3 49 10 E 3 52 6 F 3 63 5 G 3 57 7 3 100 8 3 54 M i 3 54 6 3 47 5 3 69 7 3 52 6 3 67 28 3 56 8 3 Lost 7 3 58 6 3 48 6 3 46 7 3 48 7 APPENDIX I 64i TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— INDIANA TOMATOES- Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 -Continued r-Mg. per Kg. - Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 5 183 32 A 6 116 40 B 5 70 8 B 6 57 8 C 5 57 16 C 6 55 6 D 5 51 6 D 6 87 9 E 5 48 8 E 6 54 1 F 5 52 6 F 6 50 7 G 5 41 6 G 6 51 8 W-2-A 5 80 7 A 6 134 18 B 5 61 5 B 6 57 5 C 5 56 5 C 6 62 6 D 5 52 5 D 6 52 6 E 5 50 6 E 6 55 5 F . 5 46 6 F 6 55 5 G 57 5 G G 47 6 X-l-A 5 73 6 A G 76 6 B 5 68 6 B G 56 5 C 5 59 6 C G 57 5 D 5 60 5 D 6 Lost E 5 45 5 E 6 62 5 F 5 63 7 F 6 73 7 G 5 64 6 G 6 7 X-3-A 5 59 10 A G 89 17 B 5 60 7 B 6 52 9 C 5 64 8 C 6 57 8 D 5 57 6 D 6 54 6 Lot X-3- Y-l Y-4- ■E E F F G G A A B B C C D D E E F F G G A A B B C C D D E E F F G G Z-l-A A B B C C D D E E F F G G Can No. Tin 69 64 49 57 75 58 62 80 58 57 67 76 58 68 48 70 50 58 75 47 53 59 63 64 60 60 51 54 68 54 74 62 63 64 71 104 51 63 58 58 61 52 51 57 54 52 49 72 Mg. per Kg. - Iron 6 6 7 6 6 16 6 7 6 6 5 6 6 5 6 6 5 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 32 i 646 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS- -INDIANA TOMATOES— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. -^ r-Mgr. per Kg. — 4 Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 1 108 8 X-3-E 1 53 7 A 2 172 18 E 2 72 7 B I 104 17 F 1 93 7 B 2 143 27 F 2 54 5 C 1 58 9 G 1 70 5 C 2 52 10 G 2 105 5 D 1 25 D 2 58 6 Y-l-A 1 66 8 E 1 58 6 A 2 74 5 E 2 42 7 B 1 77 6 F 1 60 6 B 2 73 6 F 2 41 8 C 1 74 5 G 1 70 6 C 2 75 6 G 2 80 6 D D 1 2 38 44 6 6 W-2-A 1 7 E 1 68 5 A 2 78 8 E 2 56 6 B 1 79 6 F 1 47 6 B 2 97 9 F 2 60 5 C ' 1 64 6 G 1 67 C 2 64 8 G 2 47 5 D 1 105 7 D 2 Lost Y-4-A 1 65 6 E 1 75 7 A 2 64 7 E 2 46 6 B 1 77 6 F 1 Lost 10 B 2 86 6 F 2 Lost C 1 73 7 G 1 51 6 C 2 51 7 G 2 57 6 D D 1 2 90 85 7 6 X-l-A 1 73 6 E 1 76 6 A 2 75 6 E 2 49 6 B 1 46 7 F 1 70 6 B 2 62 7 F 2 75 6 C 1 55 6 G 1 46 6 C 2 46 6 ' G 2 64 7 D 1 49 5 D 2 51 5 Z-l-A 1 68 7 E 1 98 7 A 2 49 6 E 2 59 11 B 1 53 6 F 1 61 8 B 2 70 6 F 2 55 6 C 1 56 5 G 1 72 6 C 2 98 10 G 2 56 6 - D D 1 2 46 43 5 5 X-3-A 1 58 7 E 1 44 7 A 2 52 8 E 2 49 6 B 1 53 8 F 1 73 7 B 2 77 7 F 2 95 10 C 1 77 6 G 1 70 7 C 2 82 9 G 2 62 8 D 1 76 7 D 2 60 10 APPENDIX I 647 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— INDIANA TOMATOES— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection i, July 31, 1916 r— M&. per Kg. — ., ^-Mg\ per Kg. — s Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lo t Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 9 Lost Lost X-3-E 9 85 8 A 10 144 28 E 10 37 8 B 9 73 8 F 9 31 7 B 10 52 8 F 10 52 8 C 9 52 17 G 9 51 8 C 10 66 16 G 10 51 7 D 9 72 10 D 10 41 6 Y-l -A 9 61 9 E 9 38 7 A 10 60 9 E 10 38 6 B 9 76 9 F 9 46 T B 10 89 8 F 10 29 7 C 9 58 1 G 9 30 6 C 10 51 6 G 10 37 5 D D 9 10 61 64 6 6 W-2-A 9 114 31 E 9 39 8 A 10 67 7 E 10 44 6 B 9 61 7 F 9 41 . 7 B 10 58 6 F 10 47 6 C 9 44 7 G 9 48 7 C 10 59 7 G 10 61 i D 9 33 4 D 10 24 6 Y-4-/ 9 29 5 E 9 40 5 A 10 71 8 E 10 51 5 B 9 72 8 F 9 35 5 B 10 66 8 F 10. 47 5 C 9 57 7 G 9 24 6 C 10 58 7 G 10 37 5 D D 9 10 54 49 9 10 X-l-A 9 51 7 E 9 39 6 A 10 64 7 E 10 57 7 B 9 56 7 F 9 59 8 B 10 52 6 F 10 58 7 C 9 52 7 G 9 61 9 C 10 39 6 G 10 67 9 D 9 69 8 D 10 19 7 Z-l -A 9 130 27 E 9 39 14 A 10 80 8 E 10 154 8 B 9 58 8 F 9 54 7 B 10 56 5 F 10 42 7 C 9 37 7 G 9 56 7 C 10 71 8 G 10 42 7 D D 9 10 10 63 7 6 X-3-A 9 69 10 E 9 42 7 A 10 74 8 E 10 43 17 B 9 33 12 F 9 66 10 B 10 76 10 F 10 52 7 C 9 68 . 8 G 9 40 7 C 10 73 7 G 10 55 7 D 9 108 6 D 10 173 6 o48 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— INDIANA TOMATOES- Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 -Continued r—Mg. per Kg. - Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 11 96 11 A 12 125 7 B 11 74 7 B 12 86 6 C 11 86 7 C 12 83 6 D 11 95 7 D 12 59 6 E 11 48 7 E 12 36 6 F 11 59 6 F 12 85 6 G 11 46 6 G 12 36 5 W-2-A 11 112 6 A 12 75 7 B 11 69 6 B 12 90 6 C 11 70 5 C 12 64 5 D 11 27 4 D 12 87 5 E 11 54 5 E 12 66 5 F 11 91 5 F 12 46 6 G 11 ■57 5 G 12 74 7 X-l-A 11 80 8 A 12 83 6 B 11 70 6 B 12 54 5 C 11 78 IV t C 12 55 7 D 11 S9 6 D 12 84 6 E 11 86 6 E 12 68 6 F 11 77 7 F 12 75 7 G 11 65 6 G 12 103 7 X-3-A 11 77 8 A 12 86 6 B 11 96 8 B 12 79 7 C 11 93 7 C 12 78 6 D 11 74 7 D 12 83 6 Lot X-3- Y-l-A A B B C C D D E E F F G G Y-4- Z-l- Can No. 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 — Mg\ per Kg. — Tin Iron 83 8 85 78 91 48 72 74 84 109 110 91 101 76 83 83 81 77 ■ 80 79 58 87 87 90 91 85 78 83 64 90 110 68 78 78 76 82 91 84 118 83 108 65 59 66 71 69 103 80 83 7 7 7' 8 8 7 6 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 5 4 5 6 6 6 6 7 5 11 6 8 7 6 4 7 7 7 APPENDIX I 649 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MARYLAND TOMATOES First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 r~ Mg'. per Kg". — x r-Mg. per Kg-. — ^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 1 56 8 Y-l-A 1 78 6 B 1 49 11 B 1 67 6 C 1 51 7 C 1 66 9 D 1 50 7 D 1 74 10 E 1 44 8 E 1 69 6 F 1 43 13 F 1 143 9 G 1 42 14 G 1 61 7 W-2-A 1 64 8 Y-4-A 1 65 7 B 1 53 ■ 7 B 1 60 6 . C 1 53 5 C 1 58 7 D 1 52 6 D 1 52 7 E 1 48 5 . E 1 49 7 F 1 52 7 F 1 71 7 G 1 51 6 G 1 47 6 X-l-A 1 62 6 Z-l-A 1 53 7 B 1 65 7 B 1 43 5 C 1 48 5 C 1 46 6 D 1 54 1 D 1 57 5 E 1 38 7 E 1 43 5 F 1 39 7 F 1 40 7 G 1 41 IV 1 G 1 41 6 X-3-A 1 52 8 B 1 54 C 1 62 6 D 1 38 6 E 1 57 7 F 1 51 6 G 1 58 6 650 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MARYLAND TOMATOES— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot W-l-A B C D E F G Can No. 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mg. per Kg. — Iron Tin 56 46 56 54 51 50 44 Lot Y-l-A B C D E F G Can No. 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mg. per Kg. Tii 94 90 59 86 54 81 43 Iron W-2-A B C D E F 58 56 57 54 54 50 49 Y-4-A B C D E F G 64 78 54 66 58 65 63 X-l-A 71 B 3 68 7 C 3 74 5 D 3 45 5 E 3 35 5 F 3 59 6 G 3 54 7 X-3-A 3 57 7 B. 3 59 IV i C 3 51 6 D 3 55 7 E 3 99 7 F 3 91 8 Z-l-A B C D E - F G 57 54 56 56 55 42 50 54 APPENDIX I 651 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MARYLAND TOMATOES— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg'. — v ^Mg. per Kg. — N Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 5 65 6 X-3-E 5 76 6 A 6 65 6 E 6 75 9 B 5 67 6 F 5 79 6 B 6 63 10 F 6 50 7 C 5 59 5 G 5 63 5 C 6 64 6 G 6 78 5 D 5 48 6 D 6 72 6 Y-l-A 78 7 E 5 57 7 A 6 87 6 E 6 51 i B 5 94 7 F 5 63 6 B 6 97 7 F 6 54 6 C 5 98 7 G 5 56 7 C 6 90 6 G 6 67 7 D 5 75 7 D 6 64 5 W-2-A 5 61 6 E 5 52 5 A . 6 54 6 E 6 '68 5 B 5 60 6 F 5 66 5 B 6 65 5 F 6 77 5 C 5 66 6 G 5 90 6 C 6 63 5 G 6 91 6 D 5 60 5 D 6 30 6 Y-4-A 5 86 6 E 5 52 . . A 6 94 6 E 6 54 . . B 5 90 6 F 5 57 . . B 6 61 5 F 6 57 6 C 5 110 7 G 5 43 5 C 6 61 7 G 6 45 5 D 5 57 5 D 6 60 7 X-l-A 5 65 6 E 5 78 7 A 6 89 6 E 6 62 7 B 5 70 6 F 5 72 7 B 6 99 5 F 6 52 6 C 5 53 G 5 117 8 C 6 63 6 G 6 64 6 D 5 81 6 D 6 54 6 Z-l-A 5 61 7 E 5 68 7 A 6 76 8 E 6 51 6 B 5 61 7 F 5 48 7 B 6 62 6 F 6 55 7 C 5 80 7 G 5 62 6 C 6 50 7 G 6 10 6 D 5 70 7 D 6 59 6 X-3-A 5 55 7 E 5 47 ' 7 A G 70 7 E 6 59 6 B 5 63 6 F 5 61 6 B G F 6 48 5 C 5 61 7 G 5 55 6 C G 76 7 G 6 49 9 D 5 7 D 6 73 6 652 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MARYLAND TOMATOES— Continued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 , — Mg\ per Kg Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 1 66 6 A 2 108 6 B 1 53 6 B 2 66 6 C 1 58 6 C 2 70 6 D 1 45 5 D 2 83 5 E 1 39 6 E 2 62 6 F 1 56 5 F 2 50 5 G 1 38 5 G 2 54 5 W-2-A 1 A 2 B 1 B 2 C 1 C 2 D 1 D 2 E 1 E 2 F 1 F 2 G 1 G 2 X-l-A 1 A 2 B 1 B 2 C 1 c 2 D 1 D 2 E 1 E 2 F 1 58 7 F 2 74 7 G 1 48 5 G 2 56 5 X-3-A 1 76 5 A 2 116 6 B 1 80 6 B 2 81 6 C 1 Lost 6 C 2 78 5 D 1 85 5 D 2 7 4 5 Lot Can No. r-Mg\ Tin per Kg. - Iron X-3-E 1 73 5 E 2 79 6 F 1 63 6 F 2 66 6 G 1 66 5 G 2 112 6 Y-l-A 1 108 7 A 2 78 6 B 1 92 7 B 2 99 7 C 1 89 7 C 2 82 7 D 1 75 6 D 2 52 6 E 1 69 7 E 2 72 7 F 1 66 6 F 2 78 6 G 1 59 7 , G 2 114 6 Y-4-A 1 73 6 A 2 63 6 B 1 68 7 B 2 84 6 C 1 64 5 C ' 2 56 5 D 1 64 7 D 2 60 6 E 1 72 6 E 2 69 6 F 1 73 6 F 2 90 j G 1 58 6 G 2 58 6 Z-l-A 1 103 7 A 2 60 7 B 1 66 7 B 2 70 7 C 1 64 7 C 2 74 11 D 1 52 7 D 2 57 6 E 1 72 7 E 2 58 8 F 1 49 6 F 2 61 13 G 1 45 7 G 2 54 7 APPENDIX I 653 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MARYLAND TOMATOES— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 r—M-g. per Kg. — -, , — Mg\ per Kg. -^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 9 66 13 X-3-E 9 68 7 A 10 150 Lost E 10 47 6 B 9 70 8 F 9 35 7 B 10 62 7 F 10 40 8 C 9 60 G 9 41 8 C 10 50 . . G 10 48 22 D 9 57 . . D 10 80 . . Y-l-A 9 88 8 E 9 54 6 A 10 90 8 E 10 76 6 B 9 94 8 F 9 65 7 B 10 90 7 F 10 56 6 C 9 85 7 G 9 30 6 c 10 119 11 G 10 42 6 D 9 41 12 D 10 81 7 W-2-A 9 44 8 E 9 117 7 A 10 35 8 E 10 72 6 B 9 55 6 F 9 89 8 B 10 91 6 F 10 128 6 C 9 52 7 G 9 67 6 C 10 60 6 G 10 52 7 D 9 59 6 D 10 38 6 Y-4-A 9 90 7 E 9 59 6 A 10 72 12 E 10 47 7 B 9 64 7 F 9 36 6 B 10 65 6 F 10 35 6 C 9 61 6 G 9 63 6 C 10 73 7 G 10 41 7 D 9 67 8 \ D 10 42 7 X-l-A 9 67 6 E 9 60 6 A 10 58 7 E 10 54 7 B 9 64 7 F 9 84 7 B 10 64 6 F 10 118 8 C 9 79 7 G 9 25 7 C 10 66 7 G 10 51 7 D 9 80 6 D 10 63 10 Z-l-A 9 46 8 E 9 64 7 A 10 58 7 E 10 49 28 B 9 63 9 F 9 74 6 B 10 37 7 F 10 58 6 C 9 45 7 G 9 49 6 C 10 45 8 G 10 53 6 D 9 61 7 D 10 42 7 X-3-A 9 60 8 E 9 37 11 A 10 59 5 E 10 57 8 B 9 86 7 F 9 66 6 B 10 58 8 F 10 37 7 C 9 40 6 G 9 Lost 7 C 10 59 6 G 10 34 7 D 9 65 6 D 10 60 8 654 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— MARYLAND TOMATOES— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 ,-Mgf. per Kg. — x r-Mf. per Kg. — N Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 11 71 6 X-3-E 11 116 6 A 12 82 6 E 12 84 7 B 11 106 5 F 11 63 6 B 12 80 6 F 12 85 6 C 11 78 5 G 11 82 6 c 12 96 5 G 12 81 6 D 11 65 6 D 12 61 7 Y-l-A 11 109 i E 11 67 6 A 12 148 16 E 12 59 2 B 11 104 6 F 11 56 7 B 12 129 7 F 12 QQ 6 C 11 86 7 G 11 71 6 C 12 111 7 G 12 74 5 D 11 81 7 D 12 117 7 W-2-A 11 83 6 E 11 97 7 A 12 70 7 E 12 67 7 B 11 60 6 F 11 72 7 B 12 Lost 6 F 12 92 6 C 11 71 8 G 11 61 6 C 12 80 8 G 12 78 5 D 11 117 7 D 12 74 6 Y-4-A 11 106 7 E 11 63 IV i A 12 104 6 E 12 84 5 B 11 97 6 F 11 74 7 B 12 99 6 F 12 59 5 C 11 72 6 G 11 86 6 C 12 91 5 G 12 42 5 D 11 79 6 D 12 69 7 X-l-A 11 83 6 E 11 80 6 A 12 76 6 E 12 72 6 B 11 75 7 F 11 80 7 B 12 77 5 F 12 72 6 C 11 83 5 G 11 59 6 C 12 84 7 - G 12 54 7 D 11 72 7 D 12 Q6 7 Z-l-A 11 70 6 E 11 62 6 A 12 84 E 12 63 5 B 11 77 7 F 11 69 6 B 12 66 5 F 12 6Q 7 C 11 72 5 G 11 76 6 C 12 65 4 G 12 82 6 D 11 66 D 12 83 6 X-3-A 11 90 6 E 11 61 6 A 12 93 5 E 12 76 6 B 11 82 6 F 11 57 5 B 12 93 5 F 12 55 6 C 11 85 6 G 11 76 7 C 12 75 7 G 12 61 5 D 11 79 6 D 12 106 6 APPENDIX I 655 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW JERSEY TOMATOES First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 r-Mff. per Kg. — s r-Mg. per Kg. — ^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 1 69 8 Y-l-A 1 57 8 , B 1 77 10 B 1 64 5 C 1 78 12 C 1 ' 52 8 D 1 51 7 D 1 51 9 E 1 Lost Lost E 1 60 9 F 1 52 13 F ■ 1 45 7 G 1 46 7 G 1 43 9 W-2-A 1 50 9 Y-l-A 1 71 8 B 1 50 9 B 1 59 14 C 1 ' ' 42 26 C 1 41 14 D 1 53 9 D 1 54 13 E 1 104 11 E 1 49 11 F 1 98 9 F 1 82 14 G 1 40 7 G 1 36 9 X-l-A 1 50 8 Z-l-A 1 51 8 B 1 51 7 B 1 62 10 C 1 52 7 C 1 48 8 D 1 54 7 D 1. 43 7 E 1 54 7 E 1 39 7 F 1 50 F 1 67 5 G 1 50 9 G 1 58 10 X-3-A 1 43 5 B 1 49 6 C 1 70 6 D 1 46 6 E 1 118 10 F 1 47 5 G 1 44 6 656 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW JERSEY TOMATOES— Continued Second Washington Inspection, February 1, 1916 Lot W-l-A Can No. 3 r-Mg. Tin 48 per Kg. — N Iron 7 Lot Y-l-A Can No. 3 ^Mg. Tin 69 per Kg. -^ Iron 8 B 3 65 11 B 3 51 7 C 3 49 8 C 3 57 I D 3 46 8 D 3 46 8 E 3 64 l 9 E 3 58 7 F 3 60 1 F 3 98 9 G 3 50 8 G 3 48 6 W-2-A 3 ' 57 8 Y-4-A 3 66 7 B 3 39 8 B 3 62 9 C 3 46 6 C 3 54 6 D 3 51 7 D 3 81 7 E 3 46 : t E 3 35 6 F 3 36 i! F 3 64 6 G 3 49 5 G 3 45 5 X-l-A 3 62 8 Z-l-A 3 59 10 B 3 36 6 B 3 41 9 C 3 94 8 C 3 62 7 D 3 113 9 D 3 64 7 E 3 56 7 E o O 36 6 F 3 62 8 F 3 32 8 G 3 44 7 G 3 52 7 X-3-A 3 54 7 B 3 56 7 C 3 62 7 D o O 76 8 E 3 46 I F 3 57 7 49 APPENDIX I 657 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW JERSEY TOMATOES— Continued Third Washington Inspection, April 10, 1916 r-Mg-. per Kg. — s , — Mg\ per Kg.-, Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 5 76 7 X-3-E 5 67 5 A 6 TO 10 E 6 57 5 B 5 55 7 F 5 60 5 B 6 66 42 F 6 55 6 C 5 71 6 G 5 82 5 C G 57 9 G 6 45 5 D 5 71 10 D 6 55 8 Y-l-A 5 75 10 E 5 59 8 A 6 73 9 E 6 55 20 B 5 111 8 F 5 100 18 B 6 73 7 F 6 Lost 8 C 5 73 9 G 5 52 8 C 6 Lost G G 55 7 D 5 114 9 D 6 85 7 W-2-A 5 76 8 E 5 64 6 A G 55 7 E 6 53 6 B 5 83 8 F 5 52 8, B 6 59 8 F 6 47 6 C 5 53 8 G 5 49 7 G G 54 8 G 6 50 6 D 5 80 6 D 6 59 7 Y-4-A 5 55 9 E 5 50 8 A 6 76 7 E 6 63 7 B 5 Lost 7 F 5 50 8 B 6 68 8 F 6 47 8 C 5 71 7 G 5 74 7 C 6 53 6 G 6 44 5 D 5 45 6 D 6 42 5 X-l-A 5 77 9 E 5 53 5 A 6 97 9 E 6 85 5 B 5 80 9 F 5 64 10 B G 49 6 F 6 53 IV ( C 51 7 G 5 47 6 C G 57 8 G 6 37 6 D 5 39 9 D 42 6 Z-l-A 5 64 8 E 5 68 6 A 6 119 20 E G 44 5 B 5 95 6 F 5 42 8 B 6 67 6 F 6 55 5 C 5 60 6 G 5 70 6 c 6 90 IV 1 G 6 24 5 D 5 58 6 D 6 57 6 X-3-A 5 75 8 E 5 52 8 A 6 65 6 E 6 55 6 B 5 62 6 F 5 81 7 B 6 115 7 F 6 44 6 C 5 66 7 G 5 57 6 C 6 68 6 G 6 61 6 D 5 86 5 D 6 63 5 658 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS- -NEW JERSEY TOMATOES— Con tinued Fourth Washington Inspection, June 12, 1916 r-Mg. per Kg. — v , — Mg\ per Kg.-, Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 1 76 14 X-3-E 1 76 7 A 2 61 10 E 2 Lost 6 B 1 65 9 F 1 Lost 6 B 2 45 8 F 2 62 6 C 1 47 8 G 1 46 7 C 2 66 iv i G 2 42 8 D 1 72 9 D 2 133 9 Y-l-A 1 86 7 E 1 45 8 A 2 Lost 13 E 2 73 9 B 1 Lost 8 F 1 53 9 B 2 Lost 8 F 2 72 10 C 1 58 6 G 1 53 7 C 2 Lost 6 G 2 55 6 D 1 65 7 D 2 59 6 W-2-A 1 60 7 E 1 66 6 A 2 88 9 E 2 44 6 B 1 62 6 F 1 61 7 B 2 61 6 F 2 52 7 C 1 71 6 G 1 58 8 C 2 66 7 G 2 67 10 D 1 50 7 D 2 91 8 Y-4-A 1 75 8 E 1 76 7 A 2 85 7 E 2 71 6 B 1 53 7 F 1 54 6 B 2 68 10 F 2 Lost 5 C 1 73 7 G 1 Lost 6 C 2 59 6 G 2 Lost 7 D 1 56 5 D 2 45 5 X-l-A 1 7 E 1 46 6 A 2 96 7 E 2 85 6 B 1 61 11 F 1 63 6 B 2 60 iv i F 2 60 6 C 1 61 6 G 1 92 5 C 2 59 7 G 2 51 5 D 1 56 8 D 2 60 6 Z-l-A 1 58 9 E 1 37 6 A 2 71 8 E 2 43 6 B 1 72 8 F 1 50 ' 10 B 2 64 6 F 2 67 4 C 1 46 7 G 1 46 6 C 2 50 7 G 2 85 6 D 1 67 6 D 2 54 6 X-3-A 1 110 12 E 1 54 7 A 2 Lost 9 E 2 62 7 B 1 Lost IV 1 F 1 53 5 B 2 Lost 7 F 2 32 6 C 1 Lost 8 G 1 38 6 C 2 71 5 G 2 51 6 D 1 66 IV I D 2' 90 7 APPENDIX I 659 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW JERSEY TOMATOES— Continued Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 r~ MgT. per Kg. — n r-Mg. per Kg. — , Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A !) 48 8 X-3-E 9 66 8 A 10 66 . 9 E 10 63 8 B 9 78 12 F 9 123 8 B 10 71 11 F 10 44 7 C 9 100 12 G 9 44 7 C 10 59 10 G 10 35 7 D 9 33 11 D 10 53 9 Y-l-A 9 76 8 E 9 51 9 A 10 66 8 E 10 43 9 B 9 76 8 F 9 63 9 B 10 75 7 F 10 50 7 C 9 69 8 G 9 44 11 C 10 58 26 G 10 37 11 D 9 94 18 D 10 60 8 W-2-A 9 84 11 E 9 51 7 A 10 84 10 E 10 52 7 B 9 Lost 11 F 9 66 7 B 10 68 10 F 10 63 9 C 9 54 9 G 9 54 7 c 10 50 10 G 10 45 7 D 9 41 8 D 10 54 6 Y-4-A 9 85 8 E 9 55 7 A 10 79 8 E 10 59 8 B 9 38 7 F 9 38 7 B 10 80 9 F 10 53 10 C 9 89 10 G 9 50 10 C 10 68 9 G 10 63 10 D 9 76 6 D 10 42 7 X-l-A 9 72 8 E 9 51 8 A 10 72 8 E 10 34 9 B 9 55 8 F 9 75 7 B 10 61 7 F 10 88 8 C 9 61 7 G 9 73 • 8 C 10 54 7 G 10 47 11 D 9 61 8 D 10 66 9 Z-l-A 9 70 10 E 9 45 7 A 10 76 9 E 10 43 8 B 9 77 10 F 9 107 8 B 10 59 27 F 10 70 11 C 9 74 12 G 9 56 8 C 10 44 7 G 10 63 7 D 9 30 8 D 10 66 36 X-3-A 9 59 14 E 9 63 7 A 10 63 18 E 10 66 7 B 9 150 10 F 9 76 10 B 10 56 9 .F 10 50 38 C 9 57 6 G 9 73 7 C 10 82 8 G 10 63 7 D 9 35 7 D 10 60 7 660 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— NEW JERSEY TOMATOES— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 ^-Mgr. per Kg-. — , r-Mg. per Kg. -^ Lot Can No. Tin Iron Lot Can No. Tin Iron W-l-A 11 79 10 X-3-E 11 32 6 A 12 76 9 E 12 34 6 B 11 94 9 F 11 33 6 B 12 74 12 F 12 32 5 C 11 63 12 G 11 43 6 C 12 71 7 G 12 68 5 D 11 98 9 D 12 67 8 Y-l-A 11 97 7 E 11 93 10 A 12 104 10 E 12 56 9 B 11 110 13 F 11 66 9 B 12 63 7 F 12 68 8 C 11 . . . . G 11 57 9 C 12 64 6 G 12 54 7 D 11 52 9 D 12 59 9 W-2-A 11 73 8 E 11 75 6 A 12 135 13 E 12 11 B 11 78 7 F 11 50 B 12 84 7 F 12 52 19 C 11 77 7 G 11 6 C 12 80 7 G 12 186 8 D 11 65 7 D 12 76 6 Y-4-A 11 104 8 E 11 76 6 A 12 58 8 E 12 68 7 B 11 67 8 F 11 64 6 B 12 51 7 F 12 62 8 C 11 58 5 G 11 38 8 C 12 46 6 G 12 81 7 D 11 88 6 D 12 52 6 X-l-A 11 80 8 E 11 61 5 A' 12 61 8 E 12 57 18 B 11 44 6 F 11 69 5 B 12 45 7 F 12 55 6 C 11 52 6 G 11 44 6 C 12 27 7 G 12 49 6 D 11 50 8 D 12 43 7 Z-l-A 11 73 9 E 11 51 6 A 12 86 7 E 12 64 6 B 11 70 6 F 11 63 7 B 12 61 6 F 12 83 6 C 11 91 6 G 11 52 6 C 12 37 6 G 12 47 6 D 11 56 6 D 12 52 5 X-3-A 11 63 7 E 11 59 6 A 12 59 7 E 12 58 6 B 11 91 7 F 11 55 6 B 12 97 7 F 12 48 7 C 11 81 6 G 11 61 6 C 12 97 7- G 12 60 6 D 11 72 6 D 12 68 7 APPENDIX I 661 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— TUNA FISH First Washington Inspection, December 1, 1915 r-Mg. per Kg. — Lot Can No. Tin \ Iron W-l-A B 37 18 12 C 39 14 8 D 40 11 8 E 41 10 6 F 40 9 6 G 40 14 5 7-2-A 6 Lost 9 B 1 16 11 C 1 19 12 D 1 10 Lost E 1 14 11 F 1 16 12 G 1 13 8 X-l-A 1 10 10 B 1 12 10 C 1 12 7 D 1 11 8 E 1 11 10 F 1 14 8 G 1 12 1 [-3-A 1 11 12 B 1 10 11 C 1 9 10 D 1 8 10 E 1 12 12 F 1 8 8 S 1 16 20 , — Mg\ pei- Kg. — Lot Can No. Tin Iron Y-l-A 1 12 47 B 1 10 14 C 1 12 12 D 1 10 9 E 1 11 8 F 1 14 Lost G 1 19 8. Y-4-A 1 8 9 B 1 10 7 C 1 10 10 D 1 9 10 E 1 10 10 F 1 15 8 G J 14 8 Z-l-A 1 12 16 B 1 Lost Lost C 1 11 9 D 1 10 8 E 1 10 9 F 1 9 10 G 1 15 9 662 APPENDIX I TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— TUNA FISH— Continued Sixth Washington Inspection, September 18, 1916 Lot Composite A Composite A Composite B Composite B Composite C Composite C Composite D - Mg\ per Kg-. Tin Iron 30 20 32 20 44 18 32 20 26 18 2(3 14 30 14 Lot Composite D Composite E Composite E Composite F Composite F Composite G Composite G Mg-. per Kg-. Tin Iron 32 8 28 10 30 18 24 16 22 8 30 12 26 12 APPENDIX I 663 TIN AND IRON IN CONTENTS— SALMON Fifth Washington Inspection, July 31, 1916 , Mg- . per Kg. ., , Mg. per Kg. Lot Tin Iron Lot Tin Iron Composite A 40 6 Composite E 46 6 Composite B 44 12 Composite F 42 9 Composite C 52 10 Composite G 36 6 Composite D 36 6 APPENDIX J APPENDIX J— ACIDITY OF CONTENTS OF CANS It is well known that there is no relation between the acidity and the amounts of tin and iron dissolved by different food products. However, for the sake of completeness, it was believed desirable to include such determinations in this investigation. The procedure followed in these deter- minations is outlined below. One can (lot X-l-D in each case) of each of ten representative products was examined. The weight of the contents from each can was determined, and, wherever possible, the percentage of drained solids and liquor. The can was analyzed for coating weight and the contents for tin and iron. Determinations for tin and iron were made separately on the drained solids and on the liquor, when such separation could be made. The acidity was determined by titration as follows: The sample (10 to 20 g.) was diluted to approximately 300 cc, 2 or 3 cc N of 1% phenolphthalein solution added and — - alkali run in until the solu- .' . N tion was just alkaline. A slisrht excess of — acid was added, the solu- J b 10 tion boiled a few minutes, cooled and the titration completed. The individual samples for titration were prepared in the following manner : The samples of cider, clam juice, condensed milk, and evaporated milk were weighed out directly. The clear liquor of the string beans and peas was tritrated. The apples and tomatoes were ground and the clear liquor expressed through linen was used. The samples of corn were ground and the milky liquor expressed through linen was titrated. The pumpkin was mixed and the clear liquor expressed through linen was titrated. The hydrogen ion concentration of the ten samples was determined by Dr. H. E. Patten and Mr. G. H. Mains of the Bureau of Chemistry, United States Department of Agriculture. The method used is briefly de- scribed by them as follows : "In each case a 4-5 cc sample of the juice or liquor from the canned product was placed in a special electrode vessel in which con- tact was made between the juice and a hydrogen electrode in an atmos- phere of hydrogen. The hydrogen electrode consisted of a small piece of gold freshly coated with palladium black and saturated with hydro- gen. Connection was made between the juice and a 0.1 normal potas- sium chlorid, calomel half-cell by a saturated potassium chlorid solu- tion, and the electro-motive force (E.M.F.) of the cell thus formed (Hg/HgCl/0.1 N KCl/sat. KCl/juice/H pd ) was measured by a Leeds and Northrup potentiometer, standardized against a Weston standard cadmium cell. By means of a constant temperature air bath, the tem- perature of the cell being investigated, was maintained at 25° C. within ± 0.05° C. during measurements. Duplicate determinations were made on samples of the same juice until an observed E.M.F. constant within 0.002 volt was obtained. Since the voltage of the calomel half-cell is a constant for any given temperature, the E.M.F. measured is the difference in potential between the juice and the hydrogen electrode, plus this constant, and is dependent upon the concentration of ^ in the juice ; the exponent, the observed electromotive force, Eh at 25° C, was calculated from the 664 APPENDIX J 665 Ph, of the drogen ion conecentration (Ph = log „, ) corresponding to equation :* = Eh— 0337 „ h 0.0591 The acidity of eight other products was also determined by titration. The table on the following page gives the data for the different products. i *Compare : Sorensen, Etudes Enzymatiques, Comptes Rendus du Labo ratoire de Carlsberg, 8, 29 (1909). 666 APPENDIX J M J3 Oh CO OS t-H N CO * O CO ■ !>■ 00 © •N©0 •ION'* • rj< ■ iO 2.88 3.11 XI - • • H • ■ • O • ■ P! 0B jj OO UI UOIJBJ^IX A'q A'lipiov iOOOOOOON^iChOi^O OaxMN^CDHN'-iNOS'HOO t>T— It— It-Ht— It— It— 1** lO CO lO • iO -00 • uO ■ iO — < oo • ■* • -co ■ • oo co ■ . |^ ■ . r^ ■ CO CO '3^ jad - 3j^ siua^uoQ ni uojj ■33j jad -Spx! •S;ua;uoQ u ' n TX CO 00 • iO' -CO00O3 ■ jJO^f ■ • _« • • 00 O CO • ■iONCv 1 <>J * • • S • • C5 > O ffl CO CO ■ ■ * • • O O 00 • • ■ • i— I 00 -CO ■ OCOH • t— I • t— I • Oi • y— I 6 o o PQ ooco • -oo ■ • -* n i> r-H.ai ■ ■ - (M • • I> • • t-H ■ CN| • i — 1 o HOi • -co ■ NIMO0 ■ ■ ■ ■ CC hoo ■ ■ * • -c^coco ■ • • ■ c 1 — 1 © ■' — 1 -i — h — ! i—l ■ T— •CO ■ • a: s- 4 a, i i i o H p ~ i— i a a. c += oc c E- ■r p > — oc c P P 0C a. cc bi EZ K -r ";-P c a: oc v. t- c 5 xr. oc a. a. X CCi O ■ O IB — i ^ : : ?V, J : ^^^ I a i ^ i • co O-i £ o CD ' -a 1 p^ ^ Oh So LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 014 421 008 6 Iraffi iiii Sm ill URHT m m '■1/ •.».:, 1 !l': ntiiitJIlli&i «>i:!i- bh man 8SS ilii'JiHtSi