o • » .**.-Jii^l.V f.O*..l'^',*°o .,**.'^%** . "d a5°^ iP-n*. ' .-^w. *.. .« .^.SJ^'. X/ ^,^., *^^^^« THE RELATIONS OF SLAVERY TO THE WAR; AND f 00iti0E 0f m AT THE PRESENT TIME. THREE DISCOURSES, PPwEACHED AT W^yj^RTOWN, N. Y., By Eev. IJ. W. KEYNOLDS. V WATERTOWN, N. Y. : SOLD AT TUE BOOKSTORES AND AT RAND's, 1861. For Civil War, tlia'. it is an evil I diSiiute not. But that it is Jba gi-eiiest of evils, that I stoutly deny. It doth indeed appear to the mi?judging to be a worse calamity than bad government, because its miseries are collected witMu a short space and time, and may easilv, at one view, be talten in and perceived When the devil of Tyranny hath gone into the body politic, he departs not but with struggles, and foaming, ap.d great convulsions. Shall he, therefore, ve:^ U forever, lest, in going out, he for a moment tear and rend it?— Miltos. It is impossible for a nation, even while struggling for itself, not to acquire some- thing for all mankind. — Motley. Whatever is just, is always true law; nor can true law either be originated or abro- gated by any written enactments. — Cicero. Tyranny is against the law of nature. — Aristotle. Slavery is introduced through human wickedness ; but God advocates Liberty by the nature he has given to man. — Blackstoxe. WHAT IT MEANS. A brief word, by way of explanation, will account for the appear- ance of this i'aniphlet. The first Discourse having been delivered, a-reeably to previou.s notice, it appeared that a few persons were displeased— the disatfected b/in-'of two classes: 1st. Those who disliked the topic too much to allosv tlicm to hear the sermon, and who —asstiming that the r.iKATMENT would be objectional3ie,— were willing to derive their impressions from report, merely. 2d. Those who attended that service expecting to dislike the address, and who heard without apprehending— as appears from their subsequent statements. My best defence, against misapprehension and misconstruction, appears to be to lay the Discourse before those who may feel any interest in the subject, in the form in which it was actually delivered. The other Discourses have grown out of the first; and are included in the publication because they were designed to illustrate and fo;tily the more radical sentiments originally expressed. The Sermons will be found not so much echoes of public opinion, a^infimations of a sentiment destined to assert itself triumphantly, if [ mistake not, in a few months, in American politics. If the pamphlet should happen to be read by those not yet prepared to accept its teachings, let ma request them to suspend their final decision until the events now pending sludl have spent their force on the public mind. I have heard it objected, that any agitation of the Slavery question, in the present crisis, is injudicious, because tending to revive party divisions and divert attention from the business immediately before IV us. In relation to the objection, I regard the people of the Free States as already decisively committed to the War ; the Government will be sustained, and the Union will be preserved ; and the thing we shall soon be obliged to decide, is. What to do with the Arch Criminal that has made all the mischief? I agree with gentlemen who say that when the house has been set on fire, the first necessity is, to smother the conflagration ; but I beg to remind them, that the next dictate of reason and self-preservation, is, to set the police on the INCENDIARY,, in order that we may never incur the like calauiity in future. E. W. REYNOLDS. May 21', 18G1. I. SLAVERY, RETEOSPECTIVE, ACTUAL, AND rROSPECTIVE. Remember Ihe clays cf ol'.l.— Peut. xxxii, There is ahvays profit in recurring- to the Past, if the retro- spect be intelligent, and the view comprehensive. In that case, tiie wise man will find, in the . surviving memorials of human history and experience, much pertinent instruction, — much to admonish, to encourage, and to guide. For humanity, in its various phases, and in its widest extremes, is impressed upon "the days of old." In its records, the rival principles that have always divided the world, and that still enlist the interest and power of mankind, have left the traces of their essence, their influence, and their results. "What can be more impressive or instructive, than to reani- mate past ages, and to see the passions which Ave have espoused, or the passions against which we are marshalled in conflict^ — displayed in their true nature, and ripening their legitimate fruit ? Eor History repeats itself, from age to age, from land to land,— like the splendid sunsets that embellish the West, and hke the tornadoes that darken the tropic seas. A few great principles, beneficent and divine — and a few great pas- Fions, pernicious and human— have furnished the materials of all the conflicts in which the nations have participated, and which it is the business of universal history to describe. Dip into what annals we will,— grope back to an antiquity however 6 TirE TtELATTONS Of ^LAVEHV TO TilK WAT. remote, — revive the concerns of a people however obscure or strange, — and we come, at once, upon these familiar elements of our nature, that are playing in our latest politics, nnd coloring 1he character of every living man,— tliese indestructible ele- ments, which Divine Providence is weaving into a succession of dramas, for the vindication of Justice and Truth, for the discipline and perfection of the world. if it be instructive to recur to "the d.TS'S of old,"' in times of social tranquility, how much more so must be the retrospect, when Hociety is agitated and confused, — when the Government is asflailed by Anarchy — v;hcn delirious pasaions echpse the pcrenity of reason — when the present scene is too much dark- ened by the smoke of the combat to admit of distinct impres- sions; and when we are thrown back upon the Past for soud footing, and for a serene, unbiased wisdom. There are fiicts find experiments, impressed upon the olden days, well qualified to enlighten us in our duty, and to admonish us of our dangers, ill the critical times upon which we are cast. I shall endeavor, on this occasion, to bring to light such facts, or such e:xperi- cik-es, out of the Past, as seem qualified to subserve the I)urposes of an enlightened patriotism, in the present crisis of affairs. In re-reading Macaulay's History, recently, I was struck by the fact, that the great social Evil, which, in this country, has been the occasion of so much discord and the spring of such imminent danger — was abolished, in the English nation, not only without violence, but without notoriety. In the Thirteenth Century-, Slavery was universal in England; but, by the Fif- teenth or Sixteenth Centuries, it had entirely disappeared from the realm. Yet, this great social revolution seems to have .gone silently forward, involving no great controversies, and attracting no special attention from cotcmporary observers. It became the object of no legislative enactments, and it pro- voked no physical force ; but it faded out of the civ^lizatiou of England under the intensifying power of moral causes, and no man can tell, precisely, at what period it ceased to stain the web of Society. TlIK RELATIONS OV SLAVERY TO THE VTXR. / If WO inquire for the causes that produced that ffreat change, in so peaceful a innauer, and by such imperceptible degrees, we shall find that the main cause was the feeling of the Churcil, touching the institution of Slavery. The Christian Church, from the beginning, in all countries, had been hostile to the practice of slave-holding. It had uniformly made its power felt, in mitigating or restricting the Evil, as fast as it became strong enough to make its authority respected. The idea of possessing pr. >purt7 in Man was repugnant, from the first, to the faudamental .1: aths of the Gospel; and there is hardly an Uiubtrious nuruo on the roll of the Church, that is not asso- ciated with some protest against Slavery, or with some effort for its abolition. Since this was the common sentiment that swayed the Christian teachers, it followed, naturally enough, that soon as the Church obtained ascendency over a tribe, or nation, it should bring its power to bear, persistently and inflexibly, upon the unjust distinction of Master and Slave. This was really the case ; and another thing to be noted, is, that the Church, in the Middle Ages,— not only in England, but in all the countries of Europe,— had all but absolute poioer to execute her purposes. Those who professed Chris- tianity, believed implicitly that the Church held the keys^ of Heaven and Earth, and could admit the dying to endless bliss, or banish them to endless pain. In that rude age, when the Norman lords were above the restraints of Civil Law, and their vassals below its protection— the only hope of the weak, was in the power of the Church, which could bless or damn the soul of the haughtiest baron. Generously and nobly, m most instances, did the priests use that ten'ible engine of Super- stition. When the gi'eat Norman chiefs lay in the agonies of death, the blessing of the Church was of more value than all the crowns of the world ; and when that blessing was made dependent on the instant liberation of those bondmen for whom Christ died, the parting sinner was not likely to hesitate where duty and interest so palpably met. So faithfully did the Christian teachers employ their tremendous ecclesiastical influ- O THE RELATIONS OF SLAVEUY TO TUE WAR. ence, for the benefit of Societ}', that Slavery became utterl}' exterminated in England, and the servile class elevated into manhood, before the advent of the Koformation. Ar.d so unquestionable was the agency of the Ancient Church in achieving the salutary revolution, that Sir Thomas Smith — one of the ablest Protestants in the court of Elizabeth — bears the strongest testimony to the fact. Although NEGRO SLAVERY, a ccntury or so later, prevailed to Bome extent in England, it never received the general sanction of the Courts; and, in the celebrated decision of Lord Mans- field, made in 1772, it was shown that no slave could be retained, against his will, by the law of the realm. Slavery was a condition so " odious," in the language of Lord Mans- field's decision, that nothing could be suffered to support it but positive law; and that support it never had from the law of England, either in Britain or in the Colonies. In America, when the Church was brought face to face with Slavery, at the organization of our Government, the combat was to be waged under different circumstances. Society had undergone great changes, since the Middle Ages ; and some of the changes were adverse, and others were favorable, to a successfal contest with Slavery. The Keu:>rmation had broken that iron machinery of the Church, which had been so service- able iu former times; and it was our weaker Protestantism that had to grapple with the American slave-holder. Keligion had ceased to be that stern and palpable "terror to evil-doers," which it had been when the Priest was supposed to hold the keys of Heaven; and it could not, therefore, exert as vigorous H restraint. On the other hand, the progress of Society had widened and confirmed all those sentiments of humanity, which are hostile to Slavery. The Institution had become, from gene- ration to generation, more aud more odious. The tendeuLy of all History, from the opening of the Reformation ojiward, was to render every form of tyranny unpopular, — to unsetlle tin; old wrongs, — to inspire sympathy for those struggling for their rights; and to create lively anticipations of the rapid spread of Liberty over the world. THE RELATIONS OF SLAVERY TO THE WAR. 9 Such were the ch'cuinstanccs under wiiicli tlie American Churcli, eighty years ago, was .suumioned to encounter that great anomaly of our repubhc — American Shivery. I say that the Cuurcu was sunuuonetl to encounter this Evil, — not forgetting, however, that the State Governments, and the Federal Convention, were also agitating the subject ; and that Slavery provoked, from the first, the resolute opposition of most of our revolutionary statesmen. But, from the nature of the subject. Slavery had always been regarded us pre-eminently a moral subject, — as something over whicli Kelicuon liad pecu- liar jurisdiction; and as a wrong on the natuue of man, so patent and notorious, that the Christian teachers must, as a matter of course, strive unremittingly to have it done away. Nor did the conflict, at first, threaten to be very severe. The predominant sentiment of the nation was an anti-Slavery sentiment, and it found a calm and strong utterance from Virginia to Massachusetts. Only in the Carolinas and in Geor- gia, were there indications of a settled devotion to Slavery, or a determination evinced to pcn-petuate it, at all hazards. The great body of intluential men, in other states, esteemed Slavery as a blot upon the nation; and their sympathies and convic'tions were lieartily opposed to its perpetuity. Sucli being the state of public opinion, it seemed every way proljable that such influences would emanate from our Government, and especially from om- Churches, as to involve, at no distant day, the peaceful removal of the one great Evil that impe\ithout going abroad, or calling uiion other parts of the Union to aid them, or act on the subject, bo long I will consent never to interfere. I have said thin, and I repeat it ; but if they come to the Free Slates, and say to them, you must help us to keep down our slaves,— yon must aid us in an insurrection and a civil war,— then 1 Kay that, with that call amies a full and 2>knary j)mver, to this House and to the Senate, over the whole subject. It Is a war poiver. 1 say it is a war power ; and, when your country is actually in war, whether it be a war of invasion or a war of ins-nrrectkm. Congress has power to carry on the war, and 7mist carry it on according to the laws of war: and by the laws of war, an invaded country has all its laws and municipal inetitutions swept by the board, and martial law takes the place of thorn. •' This power in Congress has, perhaps, never been called into exercise under the present Constitution of the United States. But when the laws of war are in force, what, I ask, is one of these laws ? It is this : that when a country is invaded, and two hostile armies are set in martial array, the commanders of both armies have )wwer to emancipate all the slaves in the invaded territo,y. Nor is this a mere theoretic statement. The history of South Ameri(-a shows that the doctrine has been can led into practical execution, within the last thirty years. Slavery was abolished in Columbia, first, by the Spanish General Morillo, and, secondly, by the American General Bolivar. It was abolished by virtue of a military command given at the I'.ead of the army, and its abolition continues to be law to this day. It was abolished by the laws of war, and 7iot by municipal enactments ; the power was exercised by military commanders, under instructions, of course, from their respec- tive Governments. And here I recur again to the example of General Jackson. What are you now about in Congress ? You are about passing a grant to refund to General Jackson the amount of a certain fine imposed upon him by a Judge, under the laws of the State of Louisiana, You are going to refund him th'^ money, with interest; and lir's you arc going to do, because the imposition of the fine was unjust. Andw^Ly was It unjust? Because General Jackson was acting under the laws of war, and because the moment you, place a milUai-y commander in a district which is the theatre of war, the laws of war apply to that district. »♦*******»•• " I might furnish a thousand proofs to show that the pretensions of gentlemen to the sanctity of their municipal institutions, under a state of actual invasion and of actual war, whether servile, civil or foreign, is wholly unfounded ; and, that tho laws of war do, in all such cases, take the precedence. I lay this down as the law of nations. I say that military authority takes, for the time, the place of all ninnl- cipal institutions, and Slavery among the rest ; and that, under that state of things, 60 far from its being true that the States where Slavery exists have the exclusive mnnagement of the subject, not only the rresldent of the United States, but the Oom- maiiMier of the Army, haspawer to prder the universal emancipation of the slaves. I have given here, more in detail, a principle which I have asserted on this floor before now, and of which 1 have no more doubt, than that you, Sir, occupy that chair. I give it in its develojiment, in order that any gentleman, from any part of the Union, may, if he thinks proper, deny the truth of the iwsition, and may main- tain his denial ; not by indignation, not by passion ;uul fury, but by sound and Bober reasoning from the laws of nations and the laws of war. And if my position can be answered and refuted, I shall receive the refutation with pleasure ; I shall be glad to listen to reason, aside, as I say, from indignation and passion. And if, by the force of reasoning, my understanding can be convinced, 1 here pledge myself to recant what I have asserted." ♦ ♦*********♦ There is, in this declaration, from one of the ablest publicists this country has ever known, matter worthy of profound consideration. THE RELATIONS OF SLAVERY TO THE WAR. 4r) Its main position is, tliat in war the military law supersedes, and, for the moment, annuls the civil law. It is for the Commander at the head of the Army, to declare what shall be law in any military dis- trict within his control : and the only question he has to ask himself is, what will host i)ronK)te the efFicioncy of his military operations. The moment a Federal army is marched into any Slave State, the general, at the head of it, has power to decree the emancipation of every slave. This is a prodigious power, — one which, it is to be hoped, our armies will not be compelled to exercise. But no man can shut his ej'es to the possibilit}', — the probability even, — that this contest will be waged, by the rebel forces, in a manner so regardless of all law, and all humanity, as to compel a resort to every weapon which tho laws of war legitimately place at our command. The South has begun, by waging a piratical irm- upon prkmt-e property. In this, they take us at prodigious disadvantage. The sea is white with the sails of our connnercc, and millions of dollar.s may be plundered, and thousands of our lives taken by their priva- teers, while they have no commerce exposed to retaliation. They have struck a blow at our "peculiar institutions," — at commerce, in which millions upon millions of our property are invested. We sug- gested, some weeks ago, that the issuing of letters-of-marque would be almost certain, sooner or later, to lead to measvrres of retaliation upon tlieir peculiar property, — the only property they have which is vulnerable to assault. At present, public sentiment indorses, fully, the policy pursued by General Butler, and set forth in his letter to Governor Andrew. But . . . ' after the Southern privateers have fairly commenced their murderous depredations upon our commerce, it will be impossible to restrain our people from wielding every weapon which the laws of war place in their hands. [From a Report of thn Boston Annivorsarics, pnlilished in tlic New- York Tr'ilrwm of June 3cl.] The annual meetings, of the American Anti-Slavery Society, were postponed by the simultaneous decision of many minds, through a wise unwillingness to risk even a ripple against the grand reformatory wave which Divine Providence is now so gloriously rolling over the nation, in this magnificent war for Freedom and the Constitution. But, glad as this people would have been to have heard the splen- did orators of Anti-Slavery, whose peerless eloqucnco all admit and 46 THE RELATIONS OF SLAVERY TO THE WAR. admire, there was no need of it this year, as a specialty, when all the speakers, at all the meetings, from the Tract Society downward, had no other text than the War— Freedon— and Slavery. The tenor of ever speech was AVar— the base was Slavery— the deep, sub-base was Abolition. Dr. Tyng said, before the Boston American Tract Society, that slave-holding— that is, holding men and women in bondage— was a crime. Hear me, added he, as they were uproarious with applause, Slavery ought to be abolished— Slavery can be abolished— Slavery shall be abolished— Slavery will be abolished— by this war. If to believe that, and to work for it, is Abolitionism, them I'm an Abo- litionist. Quoting from a South-side clergyman, who argued that Slavery was a divine institution— " Yes," said the Doctor, "as hell is a divine institution, and destined, I hope, to go to the devil with the close of this war." Beyond denial, this speech of Dr. Tyng was, as The Traveller has intimated, the boldest and most eloquent speech of the kind, ever listened to by Boston orthodoxy. Middlemen and ultra conservatists, that six months ago would have turned pale and stood aghast at such a belching of fanaticism, now bent over and applauded to the echo the strongest patriotic and Anti-Slavery blasts of the lion-hearted Doctor, who seemed, as the French say, in a state of perfect abandon to his theme, and yet of entire control and choice of his language. The inspirited afflatus was plainly upon him. The sacred furore was clear to be seen. Abolitionists, proper, had nothing to do but leave the course clear for such a fiery charger, whose neck was clothed with thunders by this glorious war for the Union, the Constitution, and Freedom. Nevertheless, at the three public meetings of the Church Anti-Slavery Society, not a few strong things were said and done, by the Revs. Messrs. Webster, Blanchard, Cheever, Davis, Thorne, Fee, Bailey. Smith, Lewis Tappan, and others. The resolutions adopted were vigorous, and wisely in advance of those births of Providence which are rapidly ripening, and which, there will not be wanting strength to deliver when their hour has come. One of them declares: — -That, in our Jud-mcnt, the guidiug Btar, through the war luto which we have been forced, is the purpose of God in regard to Slavery, as made kno^^al by llm word His Ppirit, and lliB providence ; and if our Government i« stiU dreaming that this .trn.'gle can be successful, while the laws of Jehovah are ignored and Ins com- mand, • Let tde orrBESSKD oo fkee,' Is disregarded, then there is preparing for u« a terrible awakening." THE RELATIONS OV SLAVERY TO THE WAR. 47 Another resolution qnotes at lonpth from the colclirated ppecch of John Quincy Adams, in 1S42, and asserts, with confidence, " that, in the order of Divine Provi- dence, the time has come for the people and the Government to avail themselves of the rights of the war power, as argncd by John Quincy Adams, and to declare an act of emanHpation as the only means of averting the horrors of a wide-spread and most Woody servile insurrection." The Ministry and Churches were recommended to sign and circu- late a memorial to the President of the United States, that, as the Chief Magistrate of the Nation — " the minister of God for good, not bearing the sword in vain," — and having the undoubted Constitutional right, b}^ the war power, with which he is intrusted, to "proclaim Liberty throughout all the land, unto all the inhabitants thereof,"— that he call, by proclamation, upon all the inhabitants of the United States of all conditions, bond and free, to aid in supporting the Gov- ernment, — assuring them all of its impartial protection under the common flag of our National Union and Freedom, A petition was forthwith drawn up, and signed by upward of twenty-five representative clergymen of different denominations, from all parts of the country, and forwarded to Washington. [From a Washington letter in the New-York Times of May 31st. J Probable Effect of the War upon Slavery. The impression gains ground that there can be no end to the present war, no compromise, no peace, which leaves the cause of it in exist- ence. The irrepressible conflict having taken this sanguinary char- acter, can no more be staid while >Slavery exists. It has been resolved, by the whole people of the North, that the Union must be preserved. The Government responds to this popular outburst of patriotism, and re-echoes it in official instructions to our Foreign Min- isters. This is the one great point determined, and it is now becom- ing evident that it cannot be made final and sure without a complete overthrow of the institution of Slavery. How, then, shall this great revolution in Southern society be effected ? It can be accomplished by making war upon it, and noth- ing seems to be more proba})le than that abolition will be a necessary result of war. The war will cost hundreds of millions, directly and indirectly, to the Government, hundreds of millions to the rebels, and the event will leave the weaker party in a condition little short of ruin. Is it not better to look these facts in the face, in the beginning of tlie contest, and make an effort at compromise, on the broad and per- 48 THE RELATIONS OF SLAVERY TO THE WAR. manent basis of peaceful and gradual emancipation, with compensa- tion ? It may be necessary that the South shall receive one or two overwhelming defeats in the battle field, before its people will consent to so radical a measure ; but, in the meantime, it will be well for the people of the North to have it under consideration. If Congress should adopt a resolution in favor of calling a General Convention of the States, looking to the adoption of such a compromise, it could not fail at once to arrest the attention of thousands of Southern men, who would prefer such a settlement to a continuance of destructive war. If, for instance, it were agreed that Slavery shoul../ l^-' **"% -.HlK.- /\ "»^.- *■^^% ^. ^of iP'V^ «*1°<. 5^>. \^ < ife: