LP 339 .B8 M5 Copy 1 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 022 115 444 7 METAL EDGE. INC. 2007 PH 7.5 TO 9.5 RA.T. Lfi 339 .B8 M5 Copy 1 The Reorganization of Public School 89 BROOKLYN, N. Y. Report made January 19, 1915, to Presideut Thomas W. Churchill, Board of Education, New York City, by William Wirt On October 31st, 1914, the Parents' Association of Public School 89, Brooklyn, asked for relief from the conditions existing in this school, because of overcrowding. To bring about this relief, a demand was made by the Taxpayers and Parents for the immediate erection of fourteen portable buildings to be followed by a new building, or an annex to the present building. With your permission I visited this school with a view to suggesting how the situation could be met. On November 6th a new school program was put into effect. I would point out that, although the initial reason for taking up the problem of Public School 89 was to relieve the congestion in that school, the sole purpose controlling the new program was to give to the children richer opportunities for study, work and play. As this demonstration in Public School 89 illustrates the method that it will be necessary to pursue in the reorganization of nearly all of your schools, it is important to note, step by step, the transfor- mation in this one school. Public School 89 lacks many of the modern facilities which are found in other schools in the city. For example, it does not have a gymnasium, woll arranged play-room, public play park with a direc- tor in charge, branch of the public library, well equipped auditorium, sufficient wardrobes, and baths. While it would have been much easier to make a demonstration in a better equipped school, yet the demon- stration at Public School 89 is all the more valuable because of the fact that it has been made with very limited facilities, and because it has been in operation for twelve weeks practically without any ex penditure for additional accommodations. The Old Progi-am of Public School 89. Prior to November 6, 1914, there were forty classes attending School 89, a building containing twenty-six class rooms, with a program planned according to instructions issued to elementary school principals — "General circular No. 4, 1913-1914, September 23, 1913." Twelve of the forty classes, representing the upper grades, were on full time, having the exclusive use of tv/elve of the twenty-six class rooms. The remaining twenty-eight classes were or- ganized in two groups of fourteen classes each and were accommo- dated in the remaining fourteen class rooms, small auditorium and five cellar rooms, with a modification of the following program: Copyrigbt, 1915, by William Wirt Old Program at P. S. 89, Brooklyn V K^^;^ ^^ ^ School Hours 14 Class Rooms Opening Exercises and Study in Auditoriiun and Playgrouhd 8:30- 9:30... First Group — 14 Classes 9:30-10:30. .. First Group Second Group — 14 Classes 10:30-11:30. . . Second Group- —14 Classes First Group — 14 Classes 11:30-12:30. . . First Group — At Luncheon 12:30- 1:30. . . First Group Second Group — At Luncheon 1:30- 2:30... First Group Second Group — At Lunch.son 2:30- 3:30. .. Second Group 3:30- 4:30. .. Second Group Since, with the old program twelve classrooms were used exclu- sively by twelve classes, the burden of the over-crowding was placed entirely upon the remaining fourteen class rooms. These fourteen rooms had a multiple use for eight hours a day, but the auditorium and playground were used only two hours a day. This means that the auditorium and playground v/ere congested during the short time they were in use. When it rained and all the children were required to be in the building from 9:30 to 11:30, nine classes were forced to use the five cellar rooms at one time as study rooms. No provision was made for the systematic use of other child welfare agencies. The Old Program Was Not Intended to Secure Greater Facilities for Children than the Ordinary Single System School Offers. The principle underlying the old program was that of securing the traditional five-hour school day by supplementing the four hours in the class room with an additional hour in playground and audi- torium. Unfortunately, the latter hour was used as much as possible for study in quarters that were never intended for use as a study room and cannot be made satisfactory for study. No one offers the argument that such a five hour school is better or even as good as five hours of regular class room work in the ordinary single system school. This program was not intended to secure greater facilities for children than the ordinary single system school offers. The purpose was to secure as nearly as possible the traditional xoork of the regu- lar five-hour full time school, and it was considered only as a tem- porary expedient until a sufficient number of neio schools could be built to provide the regulation full time school. Since the main object was the building of additional school buildings for permanent relief, no funds could be expended upon this temporary double sys- tem expedient. / 2 ©CIA398()21 APR 16 1915 The Part Time Problem. I do not know ot a finer presentation ot the part time school prob- iem thaVtLt of your special committee on Part Time ^Docnme„ No 9-1913) The criticisms that I have made of the Old Program at PS. 89 were made by the Fart Time Committee as follows: Two Classes With Two Teachers In One Boom. •■one 0. the .