X * ^M A . ^ ' ' * -''>., --^^\,.;^;.;V" ^ ^%%^;^ ^^^ -^^ ^^'^^0^ „ ■^f-^ * S 1 A ' ^' .\^' »r r^v - ^ . , -s-^r" r >.li C- '' o * ,, 'I- ' ^ '/ o X -<-' ■ -, '<■ ,\ V- '"^ .^^ ,V ^ .^ ^> ^^. ,^\\' .Oc ■^^ * \ V- -N^,-^^^ 0^ c'^^'^.;-^ ^^ •'' -f ■'':'f^.^ %- <^ < •' ^ » ^ ..^ ^ ,0- -0 « . -^ -'/; -'■ '^ ■■??•■ ii'''^ ■"■-"■ . '^^. * .'. s ^ .'\^ '^'^^'^ ,y % '^.^^•^ .# ^ -7-. vO ■\ '^ x^^'^-^ *-. o 0>' 'r ""^^ V^ ■<• V. \N -vie, '7->, ^^^ , N (. „ ' '/ "^1 FIRST PRINCIPLES POLITICAL ECONOMY WITH REFERENCE TO STATESMANSHIP PROGRESS OF CIVILIZATION BY PROFESSOR W. D.^WILSON OF THE CORNELL UNIVERSITY " It has something essential to teach the statesman and the mor- alist, as well as the producer, the exchanger, and the consumer of commodities."— Dr. Elder. T r^ r^ / -^ ^'V 'COPYRIGHT ^f. ITHACA L^ IS75..V^ FINCH & APGAR ^'-mTiy^j ^875 \^';^:rr--y .1^, 1. p Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1875, BY W. D. WILSON, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. Stereotyped by B. II. vwn Sviit'-, Ithaca, N. Y. PREFACE. The world is so full of books on all subjects that it is expected of any one who adds another to the number already existing, that he will offer some apology for the new demand he is making upon public attention. And the Preface seems to be the place and the occasion where he is expected to make it. Having been called some fifteen or twenty years ago to teach Political Economy — in consequence of there being no one else that had leisure to do so — I soon began to prepare the way for the use of the text books I had chosen, by certain elementary definitions and statements, like what are contained in the earlier chap- ters of the ensuing pages. Gradually, however, the elementary definitions which had thus been commenced, grew into nearly all that is contained in this work. The manuscript served for several years as the notes from which I gave the required Lectures, and is now printed for the use of the students who attend the lectures in the 4 PREFACE. ordinary course of University instruction. And it is offered to the public in hopes that it may do something towards advancing a knowledge of those principles of the creation and distribution of wealth which confessedly lie at the foundation of our civilization, and are among the most influential and controlling influences that affect human progress. If the book now ofiered to the public is found to have any merits, it will be, I think, because — 1. It presents the topics in a better order and arrange- ment. 2. It gives to the primary facts and principles, clearer and more precise definitions. 3. In consequence of the two foregoing peculiarities, it makes certain broader generalizations which are, I think, of great scientific interest and practical value. I am under great obligations to Professor Z. H. Potter for valuable labor in getting the Mss. ready for publica- tion and for assistance in carrying it through the press. W. D. WILSON. Cornell Un'versity, Ithaca, N. V., February, 1875. CONTENTS, I. TITLES OF THE CHAPTERS. CHAP. I. INTRODUCTION. CHAP. II OF THINGS IN RELATION TO WEALTH. CHAP. III. — OF PERSONS IN RELATION TO WEALTH. CHAP. IV. OF THE FORCES OF NATURE IN RELATION TO WEALTH. CHAP. V. — OF POPULATION IN RELATION TO WEALTH. CHAP. VI. OF RENT AND WAGES. CHAP. VII. OF EXCHANGE. CHAP. VIII. — OF MONEY AND BANKING. CHAP. IX. — OF OVER-POPULATION — HOPES AND PROSPECTS. II. ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION. Political Economy defined, . . . . 1 7 Important to a nation, . . . . .18 Subdivisions of the subject, .... 19 COJSTTENTS. How far a science of facts, Everything considered in a state of change, Unsettled in regard to its general principles, First reason for this. Second reason, . Third reason, Our position in regard to it^ Practical value of Political Economy, Subservient to higher civilization. 7!^ 22 23 23 24 24 26 26 7& CHAPTER II. OF THINGS IN RELATION TO WEALTH. Of things in relation to w^ealth, . . . 31 The cost of a commodity, . . - . - 3' Utility or intrinsic value, . . . . 32 Intrinsic value for different purposes, . . - 33 Intrinsic value for different persons, ... 34 Intrinsic value for different uses, . . . -35 Measure of intrinsic value, .... 36 Exchangeable value, . . . . . -37 The product of labor, . . . . . 38 The average cost of reproduction, . . . - 39 Labor increases intrinsic value, .... 40 The kinds of human wants, . . . . - 41 Price, distinguished from value, .... 42 Price determined by value, . . . . .45 Supply and demand, as affecting price, . . . 46 Three modifications, . . . . . 47 Illustration, . . . . . . 4^ - CHAPTER III. OF PERSONS IN RELATION TO WEALTH. The two elements or factors of wealth. 5S CONTENTS. 7 "Value in relation to sale and consumption, . - 52 Wealth considered as distributive and aggregate, . 53 Aggregate wealth important to nations, distributive wealth to individuals, . . ... 54 The motives by which men are actuated, . . - 55 Different kinds of human wants, ... 56 All persons considered as laborers, . . . -57 Producers and consumers, . . . . 57 Unproductive consumption, . . . .58 Producers classified, ..... 58 The function of agriculturists, . . . - 59 The function of manufacturers, ... 59 Their relatiuii to intrinsic value, . . . .60 Limit to the increase of exchangeable valu ■, . . 61 Limit to manufactures, . . . . .61 Their relation to distributive wealth, . . . 61 The function of traders, . . . . .64 Their relation to quantity and intrinsic value, . . 65 The way in which they increase wealth, . . .65 Limits to their usefulness, .... 68 Usefulness of the three classes compared, . . - 69 The function of inventors, . . . 71 All the population referred to the three classes, . - 72 CHAPTER IV. OF THE FORCES OF NATURE IN RELATION TO WEALTH. Reduction of prices, ..... 76 Limit to the decrease, . . . . - 77 The use of tools and machinery, . . . 7^ Their relation to the forces of nature, . . .79 The forces of nature defined, .... 79 The forces of nature gratuitous, . . . .80 S CONTENTS. ( They are inexhaustible, ..... S'b Conditions of tlieir use, . . . . .82 Extent of their usefulness, . . . . . 82 Man's position in nature, . . . . .84 Effect of machinery on price, .... 85 Why not uniform in its influence, . . . - ^5 Recapitulation and summary, .... 87 Elements of the labor of production, . . .88 Land both a tool and a force, .... 89 Ricardo's theory of rent, . . . . - 9> Criticisms on the theory, .... 92 Land never costs more than the average cost of reprodaetion, 93, How far Ricardo's theory correct, ... 94 Effect of a limit to the supply of land, . . -95 What makes the price of land, .... 96 Land rises in price with cultivation, . . - 97 New intrinsic values with increased population, . 98 Increased value of human labor, . . - . 100 Exchangeable value referred to its elements, . . loi Taxes and insurance, ..... 102 Commodities become cheaper, .... 103 CHAPTER V. OF POPULATION IN RELATION TO WEALTH. The emergence from savagery to civilization, . . 107 Tendency of savage life downwards, ... 107 Civilization or education upwards, ... 108 Numbers necessary to the use of the forces of nature, . 109 Origin and use of capital, . . . . 1 10 Capital represents only labor, . . . . IIO The first effect of an improvement, - . . Ill The second effect, . . - . . .112 The ways in which density of population affects wealth, 115 CONTENTS. (I) Division of labor, . . . . -II7 Saving of capital, . . . . . Ii8 Increase of knowledge of materials, . . .119 Increased skill and dexterity, . . . 119 Adaptation of natural abilities, .... 120 Saving the time of others, .... 120 Division of labor implies co-operation, ... 121 Limits to the division of labor, ... 122 (II) Saving in the cost of exchanges, ... 125 Saving in labor and travel, .... 126 Saving in the cost of roads, .... 127 Saving in teams, etc., . . . . . 128 The saving by living in villages, .... 129 (ill) Increased stimulus to production, . . 130 (iv) Articles come to have new values, ... 131 (v) Increase in the proportion of agricultural population, 132 Modifying considerations, .... 133 Waste in relation to the increase of wealth, . . 135 Unproductive capital, ..... 138 Moral influence of having the producer and the consumer near together, . . . . . . 139 CHAPTER VI. OF RENT AND WAGES Wealth the product of three elements, English use of rent, wages, and profit, Capitalists and laborers, Their necessity to each other, Rent, wages, and profit, The contract between the parties. The law of supply and demand. The fact of competition. 142 142 145 146 147 148 149 ISO lo • CONTENTS. The effect of these laws on prices, ... 153 May not act instantaneously, . . . . 153 The force of habit on prices, .... 155 The law of supply and demand will produce a supply, 156 WiU distribute laborers to their various callings, . 156 Will regulate wages among the different employments, . 157 Time a factor of wages, .... 159 Time also a factor in rent, .... 160 The result reached by another process, . . 161 Every laborer wants all he can get, .... 162 The higher wages of skilled labor, . . . 163 Exceptions to the law, ... . . . 165 Effect of constancy of occupation, • . . 165 Second law determining the rate of wages, . .166 Average cost of reproduction will not explain them, . 167 In what sense wages equal in all departments, . . 168 This just as well as necessary, .... 168 Different rates of rent, . . . . . 169 Relation of rent to interest, . . . . 170 Rate of interest decreases with increase of capital, . • ^1^ Depends rather on value than amount, . . . 173 Important law of distribution, . . . .174 Capitalists cannot defeat this law, . . . 1 75 Equality between rent and wages, . . . .177 The same result reached in another way, . . 177 Causes that retard the operation of the law, . .178 Predominance of labor, . . . . 179 CHAPTER VII. OF EXCHANGE. No exchange without division of labor, . . 182 Exchange between those who use tools, ... 183 Tools the result of past labor, .... 184 How determine their value, . . . - 185 CONTENTS. II Tools reappear in other articles, . . . i86 The basis of exchange, . . . . . 187 Elements of labor represented in any article, . . 188 Basis of estimate between the buyer and seller, . .189 The gain by the exchange, .... 189 The money-price of but little account, ... 191 In what respects important, .... 191 The benefits of exchange, ..... 192 The cost of exchange, ..... 193 Who bears the cost ? ..... 194 Cost varies with bulk and weight, ... 195 Commercial centres determining prices, ... ig6 How determined at the centres, ... 198 Effect of the rising of new centres, ... 200 Limitation to the law, ..... 201 Cost distributed between the producer and the consumer, 202 The only way of escaping this result, . . . 202 What is sold determines the price of all that is produced, 203 It determines also the price of all other articles, . . 204 A common mistake with regard to the benefits of trade, 205 Thrift determines the amount of exchanges, . . 206 Benefits of proximate exchanges, . . . 209 Articles should be manufactured at a place of production, 211 Difference in facility for manufacture and production, . 212 The great wealth of commercial centres, . . 213 Inferences in favor of free labor and free trade, . . 215 Governments not satisfied with this, . . . 216 I. Monopolies, copy and patent rights, . . .217 II. Usury laws, ..... 218 Arguments in their favor, ..... 219 III. Tariff, for revenue, .... 221 Objections to it, . . . . - . 222 Effect of tariff on importations, ... 223 What makes a tariff protective, .... 226 Effect of a tariff that is below protection, . . 226 Limits within which protection is possible, . . 227 12 CONTENTS. List's doctrine, ..... 229 Protection and national independence, ... 230 Diversification of industry, . . . . 23 1 Free trade reduces the wages of the laborers, . - 231 The evil effects of low wages on the laborers, . 232 Beneficial effects of the higher manufactures, . . 236 Free trade only with free laborers, . . . 238 Difference between British doctrine and British practice, . 239 John Stuart Mill advocates protection, . . . 240 Classes of persons that are not likely to favor protection, 242 Political motives that may oppose it, . . . 244 Probability of the continuance of protection in America, 245 CHAPTER VIII. OF MONEY AND BANKING. Traders between producers and consumers, . . 247 Money the means of exchange, .... 247 Theories of money, ..... 248 Gold and silver a part of the wealth of a country, . . 249 What determines their value, .... 249 Useful for other purposes than coin, .... 250 Proof of this view, . . . . . 251 Reasons for using them for coinage, . . . .251 Signification of coinage, .... 252 Effects of increase of gold and silver, ... 253 Labor, not money, the standard of value, . . 253 Importance of this view, ..... 256 Market value determines the coin value of silver and gold, 257 Money and trade, how they enrich, . . . .257 Trade enriches individuals, .... 258 Banks, (i) as places of deposit, .... 259 Banks, (2) as places of exchange, ... 260 Saving of labor thereby, . . . - . 261 CONTENTS. 13 Clearing houses, - - . . . 261 Banks, (3) for discount and loans, .... «62 Banks, (4) for issue of bills, .... 263 Paper currency saves loss, ..... 264 Less specie needed, ..... 265 The process of banking, ..... 265 The bankers' resources, .... 267 Loan of the deposits, ..... 268 The nature of the "loans and discounts," . . 270 Loans deposited, ...... 271 Necessity for a specie basis, .... 272 The effect of redemption, ..... 274 Ratio of specie to loans and discounts, ... 275 Limit to a bank's "ciixulation," .... 278 How banks cause fluctuations in prices. . . 278 Return to specie payments after suspension, . . 279 Ratio of specie to circulation in this country, . . 280 The effects of over-issue, ..... 281 How money differs from other commodities, . . 282 What determines the amount of paper, . . . 285 Banking compared with other "business," . . 286 How determine the amount of paper needed, . . 287 How determine the amount of specie, . . . 289 Governments cannot control the amount, . . . 290 How gold and silver affect the amount, ■ . . 292 Why no more is coined, ..... 293 Effects of inconvertible paper, .... 294 A practical test proposed, ..... 295 How money gets into circulation, ... 296 Paper not convertible on demand, .... 298 Premium on gold determined by the ratio of gold to paper, 299 CHAPTER IX. OF OVER-POPULATION — HOPES AND PROSPECTS. W^ealth the product of quantity into value, . . . 301 Man's well being depends on distributve wealth, . 302 14 CONTENTS. Effects of increasing and of decreasing wealth, . . 302 Effects seen in large cities, .... 304 Two theories of population, .... 304 Reasons for Malthus's theory, .... 305 Reasons for Carey's theory, ..... 306 How far satisfactory, . .... 308 The rate of increase of production, .... 309 The rate of increase of population, . . . 310 Limits to the rate of increase of population, . - 3^1 Statistics bearing on this point, . . . . 314 Difference between civilized and savage society in this respect, 315 Inference from the foregoing, . . . . 317 Reference to the present condition of civilized nations, . 317 The rate of interest indicates the rate of increase of wealth, 318 This compared with the rate of increase of population, . 319 Inference from these facts, .... 320 A turning point in the law, ..... 322 Signs of approach to it, . . . . . 323 The effect of reaching it, .... . 324 Changes in social and private habits, ... 325 Fears of a noblesse of wealth, .... 326 Reasons why there can be none, . . . . 327 Unity of executive necessary, . . . . 329 Effects of increasing intelligence, . . 330 Fears of a violent assumption of wealth by the few, - * 331 The poverty of the many no fault of nature, . . 332 Economic effects of universal suffrage, . - . 334 Increasing regard for the principles of right, . . 336 Improvement in the administration of justice, . . 337 Approach towards social equality, . . . 340 No over-population possible, . . - . 341 Appendix, ..... . 343 BOOKS OF SPECIAL VALUE FOR REFERENCE. As no one book in any science can ever be satisfactory to the student who wants to look on all sides of his subject, I subjoin a list of those which have seemed to me to be especially worthy of reference and consultation, naming those which not only seem to be the best, but are also within easy reach of all persons. These works I arrange under three different heads, — (l) those of import- ance as marking eras or stages in the progress of the science. (2) those to be regarded as the fullest and best treatises that represent the science as it now is, and (3) a few smaller books of great value which are more within the reach of ordinary readers. I. BOOKS THAT HAVE MARKED AN ERA IN THE PROGRESS OF POLITICAL ECONOMY. /. Aft Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Na- tions. By Adam Smith, LL.D. First published 1776 or 7. 2 vols. 4to. This work is regarded as the foundation and in some sense the fountain of the Science. It is seldom read now, however, by those who are anxious to get the most and best information in the shortest space. 2. An Essay on the Principles of Population as it affects the Future Iinprove?ne/it of Society. The first edition, London, 1798, I vol. 8vo., was anonymous. In 1826 appeared the sixth edition, 2 vols. 8vo. with the author's name — Thomas R. Malthas. The work is noted for the introduction of the famous Malthusian theory of population. J. 77^1? Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. By David Ricardo, Esquire, i vol. 8vo., 1821, 3d ed. This book is famous for the introduction of the very commonly received doctrine of Rent known as the Ricardo theory. 4. The Past, Present, and Future, By Henry C. Carey. I vol. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1848. Tills was, and is still, the most elaborate discussion of the sub- jects of Population and Rent, in opposition to Malthus and Ricardo, that has been published. It goes over the whole ground of History and Geography with reference to the questions involved : the culti- vation of the soil, which is the first to be cultivated and which the first to be abandoned by a retiring population, and the relation of the rates of the increase of population and of wealth respectively, in the case of both an increasing and of a decreasing density of population. 1 6 BOOKS FOR REFERENCE. II. BOOKS THAT ARE TO BE REGARDED AS THE MOST FULL AND COMPLETE EXHIBITIONS OF THE SCIENCE AS IT NOW EXISTS. 1. Principles of Social Science. By Henry C. Carey. 3 vols. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1858. 2. Principles of Political Economy, with a sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Science. By J. R. MacCullock. i vol., 8vo. 1825. Fourth ed. 1849. J. Principles of Political Economy, ivith some of their applications to Social Philosophy. By John Stuart Mill, 1848. There have been two American editions, one in Boston and another still later by the Appletons, 2 vols. 8vo., New York. There is also a cheaper edition, I vol., double columns and fine print, by Lee, Shepard & Dillingham, Philadelphia, 1872. 4. National System of Political Economy. By Frederick List. Translated from the German, with Notes and a Preliminary Essay, etc. I vol. 8vo. J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1858. Of these works, the first named advocates Protective Tariff; the second is opposed to it. Mill is, perhaps, the most complete work, on the whole, extant. He writes, however, from an intensely British point of view, although he admits that if he were an Amer- ican he should probably advocate Protection here. The work of List is especially valuable as exhibiting the effects of the two sys- tems of policy on the various nations of the civilized world. III. SMALLER WORKS OF VARIOUS CHARACTERS THAT ARE WITH- IN THE REACH OF ALL. 1. Amei'ican Political Eco7iomy, including Strictures on the Man- agement of the Currency since i8bi. By Francis Bowen, Pro- fessor in Harvard College, i vol. 8vo., pp. 495, 1870. 2. Elements of Political Economy. By Arthur Latham Perry, Professor of History and Political Economy in Williams College. 8vo., pp. 449, 1866. J. The Science of Wealth — a Manual of Political Economy, em- bracing the Laws of Trade, Currency and Fiitance. By Amasa Walker, LL. D. Lecturer on Political Economy in Amherst Col- lege, 1867. I vol. 8vo., pp. 496. 4. A Manual of Political Econoi?iy. By E. Peshine Smith, 1853. l2mo., pp. 269. Of these authors, Bowen and Smith advocate Protection. Perry and Walker advocate Free Tra(?e. Walker is particularly full on the subject of currency. I add one work more, which I think of great value. I know of none that is more. so. Questions of the Dav, Economic and Social. By Dr. WilHam El- der, 1871. I vol. 8vo., pp. 367. Published by Henry Carey Baird, IPhiladelphia. POLITICAL ECONOMY. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION. Political Economy defined — Important to a nation — Subdivisions of the subject — How far a science of facts — Everything considered in a state of change — Unsettled in regard to its general prin- ciples — First reason for this --Second reason — Third reason — Our position in regard to it — Practical value of Political Econ- omy — Subservient to higher civilization. /. Political Economy defined. Political Economy is defined to be the "Science of wealth." The word wealth, however, is used in two senses. In one it is a concrete term and denotes the material objects which one is said to own, and which he may use for the promotion of his comfort, his welfare, or his pleasure. In the other it is abstract and de- 2 1 8 POLITICAL ECONOMY. notes simply well-being. This last was formerly the most common use of the word, though the for- mer use is now the prevailing one. The word "Economy" itself means primarily household law ; or the law of the family. And as "the ways and means" of life are usually a matter of prime concern to every family, the general term came naturally to have the limited and specific meaning of the law or way of making the supplies more abundant in quantity and of using them to the best advantage. 2, Important to a nation. And what is thus important to the family becomes also a question of engrossing and controlling im- portance in the management and administration of the affairs of a nation. Most of the peoples who have risen to be wealthy and powerful nations have begun their career in poverty, and barbarism. In- creasing numbers and wants soon force upon them the necessity of considering the means of supply. And the development of the moral sense will soon impose restrictions upon the acquisition and use of the "ways and means." Most barbarians are ma- rauders and pirates. Hence in a general sense we say that Political Economy is the science which teaches us how to INTROD UCTION. 19 make the best use of the material objects in Nature around us for the promotion of our well being. J. Subdivisions of the subject. It is sometimes divided into four branches, Pro- duction, Distribution, Exchange and Consumption. These four terms denote the classes of operations into which all the acts of men in relation to wealth may be divided. But it is not convenient to treat them separately, since no one of them can be satis- factorily discussed without some knowledge of the others. But the subdivision and classification is recognized and based upon four facts, namely : that before any- thing can be an object of wealth, labor must be bestowed upon it in prodiietio7i ; and second, that this labor must be co-operative ; tjjat is, it must be the work of more than one person, each co-operating with and helping the other. Hence there must be a distribution of what is produced between the sev- eral parties who have bestowed labor, or a represent- ative of labor called "capital," in its production; and third, before it can be used and so minister to man's wants there must be an exchange between the producers and consumers, of different kinds, that all persons in a community may share in the products of its industry ; and fourth, in the use of any article 20 POLITICAL ECONOMY. there is a consumption, a using up of what has been the subject of labor, distribution and exchange. 4.. How far a science of facts. It has been customary to regard Political Econ- omy as peculiarly a science of facts and deduction based upon extensive collections of statistics. The consequence is that there is an almost endless diver- sity of opinions among writers on the subject, and so much of diversity and uncertainty is there in their teaching that the doctrines of the schools and the professed teachers of Political Economy have been found of very little value by practical men, and a very unsafe guide to statesmen, financiers, and business men generally. I propose in these Chapters to pursue a different method with ho^es of better and more satisfactory results. In fact no law can be proved a posteriori, that is, from a mere gathering and comparing of facts. In all such attempts there is an assumption, tacitly made and often without the slightest suspicion of the fact that any such assumption has been made, upon which, nevertheless, the certainty and value of the conclusion depends no less than upon the collected facts themselves. In mathematics it is held to be a certainty that INTR OD UCTION. 2 1 any two points will determine the course or position of a straight line. If now we have two or more points and assume that they are in one and the same straight line, we can from the data thus given easily determine the direction and equation of the line. But a line to pass through any number of given points need not be straight. It may have a curva- ture almost endlessly varied. And what is more to our purpose now, it may in its course between those points or beyond them, run any where or in any con- ceivable direction, and of course, therefore, to any length or distance, or reach any singular point which may seem exceptional and beyond all law and all possibility. But if, in addition to one or two points in the course of the line, we know the forces that propel any object that is moving along the line, keep it in, and determine for it its course, we can deter- mine the nature of the line, and the velocity and position of the moving body at any given moment All this is as familiar as the a, b, c's, to those who are acquainted with analytic mathematics, and the calculus. Now what points are to the line, and the line to these mathematical calculations, facts are to a law, and both flicts and law are to science. If we know the cause or causes of any motion or movement ; where they are situated, how and in what direction and with what force they act, w^e can determine the 22 POLITICAL ECONOMY. line along which the moving body will progress, and the points it can possibly reach, or in other words, the law of its motion. 5, Everything considered in a state of change. In Political Economy we must consider every thing in a state of change ; we take the raw material and follow it through all its stages of changing form, increasing value and final return through con- sumption to the state of nature, a mere mass of inorganic elements. We consider society also in all its stages, from savagisra up to the highest civiliza- tion, from the sparsest population found among savage, or half-civilized, or nomadic tribes, up to the densest accumulations of inhabitants in any of our most wealthy commercial centres. And we con- sider wealth also from its first beginnings in the savage state of man, where there are no mechanic arts, where there is no exchange, or only the least possible amount, up to the fortunes that are counted by millions, and the commerce that brings to our doors every varied product of the earth's abundance that can minister to our wants. Hence it is evident that we have to deal with what the mathematician calls "variable quantities," and are concerned chiefly with the laws of variation — increase and decrease. And the truths we shall have occasion to discuss,, INTRO D UCTION. 23 can for the most part be best stated for all who understand such forms, in the forms of mathematical equations — and especially differential equations. The differential coefficient we can seldom if ever find, but its nature we can always determine. And we can thus know whether it be a whole number or a fraction, positive or negative, such as to imply an attainable maximum or minimum, or unattainable hmits or not. I shall occasionally use these forms of statement, explaining my expressions as I go along, so as to make them intelligible to those who have not studied that branch of mathematics. 6. Unsettled in regard to its general principles. Of all the branches of knowledge that lay claim to be considered as sciences, there is no one perhaps that is less settled in the definitions of its terms, and the acceptance of any general first principles, than Political Economy. y. First reason for this. For this, two reasons may be assigned. Perhaps there are several more. The first that I shall specify, is the one already alluded to in speaking of the method that has been proposed. It has been regarded as pre-eminently a 24 POLITICAL ECONOMY. science of observations and facts. But the facts are so numerous, so complicated, that the opportunity for mistake and error, that always exists in a positive science, becomes not only a probabihty, but almost an inevitable necessity in this case. 8, Second reason. Another cause of the present condition of the science arises, as I think, from the disposition to dis- cuss, even in the most elementary treatises, the questions of statesmanship and social organization, which are rather applications of the science, than parts of the science itself In this respect each writer has some opinions and theories of his own ; some form of government or measure of finance, or scheme of social reform that he is anxious to pro- mote, and it would be contrary to human nature if under such influences, each one were not led — per- haps unconsciously — to give as definitions, accept as axioms, and assume as first principles whatever has a tendency to support the object he has in view, the form of government he would vindicate, or the finan- cial policy he would promote. g. Third reason. But again : Each writer is a citizen or subject of some particular nation. The facts around him are INTR OD UCTION. 2 5 likely to be the first that are seen, and those that are the most attentively studied. He is apt to assume that they are natural, "and the result of natural laws, how much soever they may have been the result of man's interference with those laws. Thus English writers generally seem to assume that Monarchy with an hereditary aristocracy, is the best form of government, and that a Political Economy, that does not vindicate such a form of government, cannot have much claim to be considered as a science. But if not this, they assume the existence of a moneyed class, who own the land, and for the most part the "capital" of the nation, whose profits are first to be secured and vindicated, and who are at liberty to employ laborers, or to spend their money in other ways as they please ; they are also generally of the opinion that England's manufacturers are one great source of her wealth, if not the greatest, and hence they are naturally inclined to the policy of trade that tends to favor England's monopoly of the manufacturing industry and commerce of the world. All these influences are natural, but they tend to bias the judgment and add greatly to the other causes that prevent a comprehensive and impartial view of the facts, and the laws of nature, on which the science should be based. 26 POLITICAL ECONOMY. 10. Our position in regard to it. In this country the biases and misguiding in- fluences may be of another character, and tending in a very different direction. But our position pre- disposes us to see the mistakes of foreign writers, and frees us from many, at least, of the influences that have misled them. It has seemed to me, there- fore, that I should have the best prospect of success if I should withdraw attention from the state of facts, actually existing in any nation, and confine my attention to the general causes and influences that are at work everywhere among men, and to consider them as accompanying and modified by the advance in population and in civilization, which takes place as a people grow up from a few savages oc- cupying a large territory, to be a densely compacted people, with no more land at home to bring under cultivation, and no foreign country, to which by way of emigration, they might fly for relief //. Practical value of Political Economy. Political Economy is eminently a practical science. Everybody has studied it to some extent and knows something about it. And sometimes it happens that those who actually know the least are ready to talk and to s^uess the most. But it is a science ITRODUCTION. 27 based on primary facts and general laws inferable from those facts. Doubtless a knowledge of Political Economy is useful to the citizen who seeks to advance his own pecuniary interest with the greatest certainty and rapidity. The statesman finds it indispensable as an aid to his efforts in promoting the aggrandizement of his country. But ^^ above all nations is hnvianity^' and the true philanthropist, who labors for the best and highest interests of his race, looks to the laws that explain the creation of wealth, and should be allowed to regulate its distribution and enjoyment, for information in regard to the conditions in which the higher influences of culture and Christianity may have free course to run and be glorified in the regeneration of humanity. The Institution of Property to which Political Economy relates, is the first and most indispensable step in any advance from savagery up toward civili- zation ; and a constitution of society and an organi- zation of the state which allows each one to possess and enjoy the fruits of his own labor and his own skill is scarcely less necessary to any considerable attainment of culture, of civiHzation, or of social and private morality even among the masses. There is immense moral power in the thought that each one in a community has and is secure in the posses- sion of all that he really deserves as the reward and 28 POLITICAL ECONOMY. product of his labors. It gives energy and inde- pendence of thought. It gives self-respect and self- reliance, without which other virtues can have at best only a sickly and unproductive growth. This is worth more than the fear of punishment or the mere hope of reward — except as it is itself a reward — in leading people to observe the rules of action and to pursue that course which promotes the truest manhood and womanhood in ourselves. 12. Subse7^vient to a higher civilization. The subject is undoubtedly one of the grandest that can occupy the human mind, and it is certainly one of the most important that can at this time en- gage the attention of the citizens of this free Republic, or interest the hearts of statesmen and philanthropists any where. The gospel is undoubt- edly a good thing — a most blessed thing for human- ity. It aims to comfort men under the evils of their fallen state, and to teach them how to make the best of them by converting them into means of in- creasing the joys and rewards of eternity. But Political Economy — which has been called in de- rision " the gospel of Mammon," — is, more than any one science, concerned in removing and extollating the very evils which Christianity aims to help us to bear with patience and spiritual profit to ourselves. INTRODUCTION. 29 I may say that individually and personally, I have no hope of any great improvement in public or private morals anywhere, except as it is to come from the hearty acceptance of Christianity as a means of teaching and bringing men into an ac- knowledged submission to God as the One Supreme Being and moral Governor of the universe. But I look to science — and to Political Economy more than any other one science — to teach men that the laws of health and happiness in this world, are a part of God's laws also, and that the recognition of, and submission and obedience to, these laws in this life, is one of the most important means towards the promotion of morality and a high spiritual culture in the masses of men, and preparing them for the life that is to come. If the Bible is a revelation of love and mercy, certainly history and science are revelations of law as well ; and both must be ac- cepted as modifying each other, and as co-working means toward our highest practical wisdom. Men must learn to submit to law before love can have its perfect work, or mercy can have its final triumph in this world. Possibly this consideration may have led me to speak with more of plainness and warmth, in the following pages, of some of the prevailing so- cial and economical evils of our day, than the calm dignity of a purely scientific treatise would allow. But I think it ought to be very emphatically 30 POLITICAL ECONOMY. stated and often repeated, that, in the reaction from the past, when the rights of property and capital have been undoubtedly too carefully guarded and held in too high an estimate, it is scarcely possible that the people of our country will not go to the opposite extreme — claiming too much for mere labor, and not sufficiently regarding the rights of capital and the sacredness of the laws by which it is protected. CHAPTER II. OF THINGS IN RELATION TO WEALTH. Of things in relation to wealth — The cost of a commodity — Utility or intrinsic value — Intrinsic value for different purposes — Intrin- sic value for different persons — Intrinsic value for different uses Measure of intrinsic value — Exchangeable value — The product of labor — The average cost of reproduction — Labor increases intrinsic value — The kinds of human wants — Price, distinguished from value — Price determined by value — Supply and demand, as affecting price — Three modifications — Illuslralion. In speaking of the things which wc daily use and which are necessary to our happiness and well-being, such words as ''utility^' ^^ value,'' ^^pricc^' *'cost,'' etc., constantly appear. And of these terms, cost is the most frequently used. ij. The cost of a commodity. But the word is somewhat vague. Wc speak of a thing as having cost so many dollars, or so much money ; of its having cost so much labor or pains ; 32 POLITICAL ECONOMY. so much time or privation, etc. Hence it is mani- fest that the word cost is not used to denote the equivalent of an object in any one thing or com- modity, that may be given in exchange for it. It must be manifest however that there will be great differences in the laws relating to these differ- ent means, as money, time, labor, privation, etc. ; any one of which may be given in exchange for an article we may want, and yet be considered as what it costs. We shall do well therefore to leave the word cost to this general use, denoting by it any thing, indifferently, that may be done, or given, or endured for the sake of obtaining a means of satis- fying our wants. But for a more correct and scientific investigation of the laws of wealth, and well-being, it will be necessary to find more specific and precise terms for many or all the elements into which cost, utility, value, etc., may be resolved. For this purpose we shall find three terms in con- stant use, and of the greatest usefulness, namely — utility or intrinsic value, exchangeable or commer- cial value, and pidce. i^. Utility or intrinsic valued Utility, or intrinsic value, is the capacity to satisfy human wants, and may be an intrinsic value for THINGS AND WEALTH. 33 either (i) immediate consumption, or (2) for manu- facture. Every object in Nature is considered as having an intrinsic value for something, or as capable of being so used as to minister in some way to man's wants. And if there are exceptions to this rule they are of no importance to our present purpose. Most objects have intrinsic value for more than one purpose. Wheat, besides being used as food for man, can be used to feed animals, and it has been in some cases used as fuel. It would also serve as ballast to a ship, and as a weight to hold down a trap door, etc., etc. So gold and silver, besides being useful for coin, are used for various purposes of ornament, as well as for utensils in the arts. And were not their intrinsic value too great for other purposes, they would be freely used for many of the more common purposes, for which baser metals are now employed. /J. Intrinsic value for different purposes. As an example of different prices of an article, arising from different kinds of intrinsic value, that is from being estimated by an intrinsic value for dif- ferent uses, we have a good illustration in the case of land. At a distance of some hundreds of miles from a village or city, it is chiefly useful for hunting 3 54 POLITICAL ECONOMY. grounds and for lumbering ; at a less distance it is used for ordinary farming, and bears a price accord- ingly. Within a short distance from such a business place, it may be wanted for garden purposes, and the raising of such vegetables as cannot well be brought in from a distance, and for this reason (among others) it commands a much higher price than the land that, though equally good, intrinsically, is situated at a greater distance. Or if the land be in the centre of a town, it will be needed for build- ing lots, and a few feet will command a higher price than as many acres would sell for, back in the country. In speaking of the intrinsic value of an article, therefore, we usually speak of it with reference to its value or use for that purpose for which it is chiefly in demand; and that will always be, of course, the utility that gives it its highest value, or that by which it satisfies the most intense want that it is ordinarily used to satisfy. 1 6. Intrinsic valne for different persons. But the intrinsic value of any article besides being different for different uses, may also be different for different persons, under different circumstances. Food has more intrinsic value to a hungry man in the state of health, than for a sick man who cannot THINGS AND WEALTH. 35 eat, and who has no occasion for food. A drug has great vahie for a sick man, but may be worse than nothing, a mere nuisance to the healthy. ly. Intrinsic value for dijf event uses. An object is useful in either of two respects, (i) for immediate consumption, or (2) for manufacture. Bread is useful for consumption as food, flour is good or useful for manufacture into bread. Manufacture and consumption are both one and the same thing; the baker in niannfacturing^oviX into bread, consumes the flour as such, although it reappears in another form and with increased value. The man that eats the bread consumes it, but in con- suming it, he manufactures it into chyle, chyme, blood, muscles, and finally, by the use of his muscles in labor, into other commodities of intrinsic value, which become articles of worth. The only difference, therefore, between what we call 7nannfacture and consumption is this : when we consider the change chiefly in regard to the increase of value given to the article by the change, we call it manufacture. But when we consider its use chiefly with reference to the giving of enjoyment to the consumer or increased value to sonictJiijig else, we call it consumption. Thus we speak of consuming coal, in the vianufacfnrc of iron. If, however, the ^6 POLITICAL ECONOMY. slag and the ashes were the most important products, we should reverse the saying and speak of consum- ing iron ore in the manufacture of coal into ashes. This results from one of the first principles of Physical Science, namely, that "man can neither create nor destroy a particle of matter." He can only change the form of that on which he operates. Manufacture is obviously only a change of form, and if the axiom cited be true, consumption can be nothing more. Nor does consumption entirely annihilate the in- trinsic value of any thing. It does in most cases, however, destroy a large part of that which had been given to any commodities by the labor of manufacture. Thus leather when made into shoes, or lumber made into cabinet ware, are worth but little as leather and lumber, whatever may be the value of the shoes, tables, etc. 1 8. Measure of intrinsic value. The measure of the intrinsic value of any article is the intensity of the want it supplies ; but this intensity is not in itself available as a measure for other things. We need something that, thermometer-hke, will measure this intensity ; and this measure is found in (i) the labor that one will perform, or (2) the privation that he will undergo rather than do with- out the article. THINGS AND WEALTH. 37 This last, the privation one will undergo, is, how- ever, of only a theoretical value. No one ever measures it. But the first named is valuable. Labor can be measured. The strength of men is indeed different, but it can be measured. Time, also, which is an element of labor, can be measured. Hence in labor we have a measure of value of the utmost practical importance. It is, as we shall see more fully below, a product of the two factors, time and strength, entering into the various operations of life in variable quantities. And although men differ in this respect one from another, yet the average strength of man is so nearly a uniform quantity through all ages and in all countries, that it gives us a most important element in measuring values. /p. Exchangeable value. Exchangeable or Commercial v^alue, or value simply so called, is the power which any commodity has of obtaining other things by way of exchange. Exchangeable value is always the product of labor. In the state of nature things have no ex- changeable value, only intrinsic value. But the moment labor is bestowed on them they acquire an exchangeable value which is the product of labor, and always bears some relation to it, so that the amount of labor determines the amount of value. 38 POLITICAL ECONOMY. Thus water has no exchangeable value at the fountain where it gushes forth from the earth. But the moment it is dipped up and carried to some place where otherwise there would be none, it is, or may be, sold at a price proportional to the distance and labor of transportation. 20. The product of labor. Exchangeable value arising from labor must be measured by labor, and the formula for this value is the exchangeable value of any commodity is equal to the average cost of its reproduction. This cost will consist of labor and capital. But capital is a product of labor and has its equivalent in labor as we shall see below. The usual formula, among wn'iters on Political Economy, has been that " value is the cost of pro- duction." But Mr. Carey, I think, first proposed "the cost of reproduction." I shall show cause, I think, for adding another word to this formula, and say, as I have just said, the average cost of repro- duction is equal to the exchangeable value of any commodity. As a general thing articles will sell for what it costs to produce them. But suppose that at a cer- tain stage in the production of articles of any class, a new process is discovered by which articles of the THINGS AND WEALTH. 39 same kind and intrinsic value may be produced with half the labor before required to produce them, the price of articles of that class will fall in market ac- cordingly, and the old articles will no longer sell for the old price. Hence the cost of reproduction, and not the cost of production, must be taken as the measure of value. 21. The average cost of reproduction. But we need a further modification. The cost of reproduction will vary with time and circumstances. A man who has recently discovered a placer of gold, may be able to reproduce ounce after ounce of the precious metal for days, with only the labor of picking it up and taking care of it. The manu- facturer who has had the good fortune to buy a large stock at very advantageous rates, so that he can replace what he is selling at less cost than his neighbors and competitors can do, will not sacrifice his chance to make a larger profit than they do, in order to sell at what it will cost him to replace his wares. Not, therefore, the cost of reproduction merely, but the average cost of reproduction is the measure of exchangeable value. Still, however, for most purposes of ordinary dis- cussion, the shorter and more elementary form, "The cost of production," will answer just as well 40 POLITICAL ECONOMY. as the more elaborate and precise one. And yet we must be on our guard constantly, lest the error that is implied in it mislead us when we least expect it to do so. Hence God gives to articles their intrinsic value, but man gives to them their exchangeable value. 22. Labor increases inti'insic value. But the labor of man increases also the intrinsic value ; thus it converts the chemical elements of oxygen, carbon, etc., into wheat, — ^u^heat into flour, flour into bread, etc., and at each stage these ele- ments acquire an additional capacity to supply human wants, and prorriote man's wealth and welfare. The exchangeable value of an article can never rise above its intrinsic value. For since it is labor alone that produces exchangeable value, no one will continue to labor upon anything after his labor has ceased to increase its intrinsic value, or to make it better and more useful. Hence although exchange- able value and intrinsic value have no common measure, and cannot be expressed in terms of one another, we have an inexorable limit to exchange- able value ; for labor cannot raise it above the in- trinsic value of the article on which that labor is bestowed. THINGS AND WEALTH. 41 2j. The kinds of hiinan wants. I have spoken of labor as increasing the intrinsic value of articles while it creates their exchangeable value ; and intrinsic value I have spoken of as a capacity to satisfy human wants. But in all this I have taken no notice of the difference in the kind of wants that may be satisfied. These wants, how- ever, are as various in their character, as the con- stitution, the characters, the tastes, and even the wishes and caprices of men. It is not at all the nature or the character of the want, that the Po- litical Economist has to take note of, or deal with. He is concerned only with its intensity, the amount of labor or of privation and self-denial it will oc- casion. It is otherwise with the statesman. The Political Economist looks only at the effects ; the statesman must regard their moral characteristics ; and to him, virtue, integrity, patriotism, manhood, and true womanhood are infinitely more important than gold and silver, or all the other effects of a financial policy. I think that all preceding writers have made a mistake in this respect ; and notably so the English, who seem to regard the want of food, and clothing, and possibly sometimes the want of the means of en- joyment of rather a low kind, as the only wants to be taken into account. But the wants of man — those 42 POLITICAL ECONOMY. I mean which are the active, motive forces, may be referred to three classes, (i) spiritual and intellectual, (2) material and physical, such as food and clothing, and (3) aesthetic, such as lead to the creation and purchase of articles of ornament and beauty. Of the first we need say nothing now, although they are among the most powerful, and in certain emer- gencies of life and of history, they — especially religious enthusiasm or fanaticism, — rise above all others, and replace them as motives to action. The second, or material wants are the ones usually in the minds of writers on Political Economy, when they write or speak on their favorite topics. But a moment's thought will satisfy us that the aesthetic wants of man are as powerful, and enter perhaps even more largely into the motives that impel to labor and self-denial, than the material. I think that more is done and endured the world over, to procure ornament, and the ornamentation of what is sought chiefly for its utility, than for mere utility alone, without thought of ornament, beauty, or the "looks of a thing." Most men would as willingly have no coat, as to wear one that is not becoming to them. 2^. Price distijigiiished from value. Price, is the exchangeable value, as modified in THINGS AND WEALTH. 43 particular times and places by the relation of supply and demand. Exchangeable value is created by labor. Price is usually indicated and measured by reference to some accepted standard, as gold, and silver coin, etc., or the currency of the nation. This distinction between price and value has not always been made. Nay, in some cases it seems to have been avoided, if not even studiously ignored. Thus John Stuart Mill, represents value as depend- ent on supply and demand in all those articles whose supply is notably limited, and he would apparently reverse the rule in regard to those commodities that can be easily produced, and to whose production there is no necessary or natural limit. He says, "It is, therefore, strictly correct to say that the value of things which can be increased in quantity at pleas- ure, does not depend on supply and demand, on the contrary, demand and supply depend on it." B. Ill, Ch. Ill, ^ 2. In another place he says, "If for instance the general efficiency of all labor were increased so that all things without exception could be produced in the same quantity as before with a smaller amount of labor, no trace of this general diminution of the cost of production would show itself in the values of the commodities." B. Ill, Ch. IV, § 3. This may be true of Price as he has used the 44 POLITICAL ECONOMY. word. But the general diminution of the cost of production would show itself in sometliing. And what shall we call that something ? It is an item of most inestimable value in Political Economy. And yet Mr. Mill has no name for it. Something must decrease with the diminution of the cost of produc- tion, and that something, it is, that is always decreas- ing with every invention and discovery ; every change or improvement, that either renders less labor sufficient to produce a given amount of value, or the same labor able to produce more value or wealth ; so that with this advance there may be an increasing distribution of wealth, and a correspond- ingly better condition of the laborers, if there be no unjust interference with the distribution. In the examples cited, as indeed everywhere else in his treatise, the only difference he makes in the use of the words, "price," and "value," are, that while the former denotes the purchasing power of any commodity in money, the latter denotes it in other commodities as indicated by simple barter. In certain states of society it is easy to see why- persons having certain forms of social and political organization to sustain, should be unwilling to repre- sent value as the creation of labor, or as bearing any constant or necessary relation to its amount. The bare statement of such a doctrine would be too likely to suggest the thought that if this be so, "the THINGS AND WEALTH. 45 laborer is worthy of his hire," and ought not to be kept in poverty and privation, while they who do but httle or nothing are abundantly supplied with the means of gratifying their wants, to be at all a favorite with those who seem to think that men were created to produce wealth, and gentlemen to enjoy it 2^. Price determined by value. It is a fact of daily observation, that where any commodity is abundant and but few comparatively seeking for it, it is cheap. But in the inverse state of things, when an article is scarce, and many per- sons are in want of it, it is dear. And thus with no change in either the intrinsic or the exchangeable value of an article, its price may vary to almost any fraction or any multiple of its ordinary amount. And thus fluctuations affect what is called the ''price'' of articles. But besides these changes there is a something that tends gradually and steadily downwards with every advance in machinery or skill, every increase in the division of labor or saving in the cost of ex- changes; and this we call ''value.'' And it is no uncommon thing to hear people say of a thing in times of high prices, "it is worth so much." But worth is value, and not price. But again we say. 46 POLITICAL ECONOMY. "it ought not to cost so much," which means that its price is above its value. 26. Supply and demand, as affecting price. It is manifest that the same result may be obtained in either of two ways, (i) an increase of the supply, while the demand remains the same, or (2) increase of the demand, while the supply remains the same. Hence this relation is usually called the ratio of supply and demand. And for many purposes it may be regarded as a ratio, in the strict mathemat- ical sense. But for other purposes, though a relation, it is not a ratio. The formula is as follows : P= F+ (d-s) This will satisfy all cases. If the demand be greater than the supply, the price will be greater than the exchangeable value, and may rise to the intrinsic value, and then its sale will stop ; the price can go no higher. If the supply be greater than the demand, the price will fall and there is no limit to its decline. When the excess of supply over demand becomes so great that price becomes negative, the com- modity is regarded as a nuisance, a dead elephant, and we are obliged to pay something for getting rid of it. And so on the other hand, if the demand be anything, and the article a necessity of life, as food. THINGS AND WEALTH. 47 the air we breathe, or the water we need to slake our thirst, the price which the article will command becomes practically infinite ; one will give all he has, and do all he can to get it. Hence the relation of supply and demand cannot be a ratio, in the mathematical sense — for the value of a ratio can never be negative or a minus quantity so long as both terms are positive. Consequently, if the relation were ratio, the price would always be somewhat above the exchangeable value, however great the supply, and however small the demand. 2^. Three modifications. There are three very important considerations by which the relation of supply and demand are af- fected. (i) The length of time that must elapse before another supply of any commodity can be produced. Thus a wheat crop, depending upon the seasons of the year, can be reproduced only at the end of another season. If, therefore, the crop should happen to be short at one harvest, the price will rise much more in consequence, than it would if another could be produced within the next three months. This of course implies that there is labor and capital enough to produce the commodity in the shorter time, which however is usually the case. 48 POLITICAL ECONOMY. (2) The length of time during which any com- modity can be kept without decay. The gardener or green-grocer, who has fresh vegetables on hand, must sell them soon or they will become worthless by the process of decay. If, however, they could be kept indefinitely, he could hold them, until either the demand should become greater, or the supply less, and thus protect himself against the loss that would otherwise be inevitable. Hence, as a general rule, the longer an article can be kept, without diminution of intrinsic value, the less liable to fluctuations in price. (3) The third consideration is this : If the ar- ticle which is short in supply be one that is re- garded as a necessity of life, the rise in price will be greater in consequence of the shortness, than if the article were one that could be more easily dispensed with. Thus, suppose the crop of wheat is short ; people are alarmed, and each one becomes anxious to pro- vide for himself Speculators are anxious to buy, in view of the rise in prices, and the demand be- comes greater than it would have been in view of the mere fact of a deficiency in the crop, to that amount. But if the article be one that people can do without, many will conclude to do so, rather than pay the higher price, and thus will be in no hurry to buy. And this disinclination to buy — this THINGS AND WEALTH. 49 knowledge of the fact that they can do without the article, will check the upward tendency of the price of the commodity. 28. Illustration. To illustrate these relations, suppose that some one should establish a caravansera in the desert, and undertake to supply the travelers with water ; the article has great intrinsic value, but ordinarily no exchangeable value. At his caravansera in the desert, however, it would have cost him in the labor of transportation, quite a sum. It would therefore have for him and his customers exchangeable value, and a price. Suppose now a railroad, or other facility for trans- portation be built, by which the labor of getting a supply would be lessened ; the exchangeable value would be diminished accordingly, and so would the price. Doubtless he would be obliged to charge some- thing for the use of the railroad ; but that fact would not interfere with our calculation ; for we shall see bye-and-bye that capital itself can be re- solved into labor, and that in paying fo'r the use of it we are but paying for past labor. So that what we pay for, in any case, is only labor — labor per- formed either in the past or at the present. 4 50 POLITICAL ECONOMY. But suppose again, that the water is a commodity that will not keep without speedy decay — and sup- . pose, also, that no new supply can be obtained in answer to an order, in less than a week or ten days. Now, if during such an interval, the customers should be fewer than usual, so that the demand should decrease, the price would fall, and he would sell at almost any price, rather than suffer a total loss. Or, if the number of travelers wanting water should increase, he would raise his price, demand all he could get, and the price might rise up to its maximum — the intrinsic value of the article, totally independent of any change in the exchangeable value, or average cost of reproduction. CHAPTER III. OF PERSONS IN RELATION TO WEALTH. The two elements or factors of wealth — Value in relation to sale and consumption — Wealth considered as distributive and aggre- gate — Aggregate wealth important to nations, distributive wealth to individuals — The motives by which men are actuated — Different kinds of human wants — All persons considered as laborers — Producers and consumers — Unproductive consump- tion — Producers classified — The function of agriculturists — The function of manufacturers — Their relation to intrinsic value — Limit to the increase of exchangeable value — Limit to manu- factures — Their relation to distributive wealth — The function of traders — Their relation to quantity and intrinsic value — The way in which they increase wealth — Limits to their usefulness — Use- fulness of the three classes compared — The function of in- ventors — All the population referred to the three classes. 2g. The tzvo elements or factors of wealth. Wealth must be considered as the product of two factors, quantity and vahie, thus Qx V= W If we know that a man owns fifty acres of land, 52 . POLITICAL ECONOMY. we know the quantity of his possessions, but we can infer nothing whatever from this as to the amount of his wealth. Or if we know that land is worth one hundred dollars per acre, we have indeed an expression of its value ; but we do not know what is his wealth until we know how much he has of such land ; with both factors we can compute his wealth— 50 X 100 = 5000, or five thousand dollars. JO. Value in relation to sale and consumption. In this formula we must for the most part under- stand exchattgeable value. But there are cases where the intrinsic value is the only one that will fulfill the conditions of the formula. If for example, a man were alone on an island with only a limited supply of any article necessary to life, the exchangeable value of that article would be of no consequence to him since he is out of the reach of exchange ; and intrinsic value, the capacity to satisfy his wants, would be the only factor that would enter into the account to modify our estimate of his wealth. If he had only one hundred bushels of wheat or their equivalent in bread, and the intrinsic value of nine bushels is equal to one year of life, we have in this fact a means of measuring his wealth. And in fact it is one of the fundamental principles of Political Economy, that the intrinsic value of that PERSONS AND WEALTH. 53 portion of the products of one's labor which he con- sumes, is the only value that enters into the account of his wealth, while in regard to that portion which he sells, the exchangeable value is the only one that is of importance to him. One hundred bushels of wheat will go as far towards supporting the farmer's family when it is selling at one price, as if it were selling at any other. But for purposes of sale and exchange, seventy-five bushels at one dollar per bushel, are as good as one hundred bushels at seventy-five cents per bushel. This is a fact that should never be lost sight of, and will come up for application a good many times in our subsequent discussions. ji. Wealth considered as distidbutive and ag- gregate. Wealth may be considered as either aggregate or distributive. By the "aggregate wealth" we mean the entire wealth of community, irrespective of its distribution among the people, and even of the number of people altogether. By ** distributive wealth" we mean the product of the wealth estimated in dollars, or something of the kind, divided by the number of population. Thus the aggregate wealth of the State of New York, was, in 1850, $1,765,944,246. Divide this 54 POLITICAL ECONOMY. by the number of population at that time, and we have $460. 86, as the distributive wealth : that is, $460.86 is the sum which every person would have had, if the wealth had been equally distributed among all the people in the State, ^2. Aggregate zvealth tinporta?tt to fiations, distributive wealth to individuals. Now it is manifest that any means which can in- crease the aggregate wealth while the population remains the same, or which will increase the aggre- gate wealth faster than the population increases in numbers, will augment the distributive wealth. And as the distributive wealth indicates the average amount of the means of satisfying the wants of the people, the greater the distributive wealth, the better the condition of the people, when regarded solely from an economical point of view. And no in- crease of aggregate wealth that is not greater than the increase of the population, so as to increase the distributive wealth or the ratio between wealth and population, can improve the condition of the people. Thus, suppose each man's distributed wealth to be $500, it can make no difference whether he lives in a nation of 30,000,000 inhabitants, with $15,000,- 000,000, 'aggregate wealth, or one of 5,000,000 in- habitants, with $2,500,000,000, aggregate wealth — PERSONS AND WEALTH. 55 his means of supplying his wants are the same, other things being equal, in each case. • Any increment of distributive wealth for any period, must always be the excess of production over consumption during that period. When, therefore, production is in excess of con- sumption, we have an increasing distributive wealth. But when consumption is in excess of production, we shall have a decreasing distributive wealth — or in other words, the people are growing poorer. And, as we shall see more fully bye-and-bye, we have in this, one of the most demoralizing influences that can be at work upon any people in the present state of the world's history. jj. The motives by zvkicJi men arc actuated. In Political Economy all persons are assumed to be actuated by self-interest, or possibly, pure selfish- ness. We do not assert or deny that this is right, nor pause to inquire how far it is morally right or wrong. We assume it as a fact too universal to ad- mit of any exceptions, that will materially vitiate the conclusions that may be drawn from it, when taken as universal. We assume, too, that man is averse to labor and privation, and that he will perform the one, or un- dergo the other, only as he has a motive to do so. 56 POLITICAL ECONOMY. arising from the want of something, that can be procured only by means of labor or privation He will work and practice self-denial, only as a means to the gratification of some want of his own. j^. Different kinds of hummt wants. Nor do we inquire into the moral character of the wants that impel men to labor and self-denial — those are questions for the moralists. The fact of such wants — their existence as motives and stimu- lants to exertion, is all that the mere student of Political Economy has occasion to consider. In reference to the laws of production, distribution, ex- change, and consumption, it makes no difiference what these wants are, whether it is the want of food to eat, clothing to wear — a house and home for shelter and social enjoyment — books and lectures for mental culture — works of art and articles of ■we7'tit, for aesthetic enjoyment — jewelry for ornament to the person — an office to gratify one's ambition — a church and religious privileges for morality and the salvation of his soul — a title to satisfy his vanity — or even the means of vicious indulgence and de- bauchery — for they are all wants, and as such, will impel men to exertion, and the kind of exertion that creates value. PERSONS AND WEALTH. 57 jj. All persons considered as laborers. We also assume that all persons need to work in order to get a supply. Some there are, of course — the rich, as they are called — who do not need to make these exertions. But they are so few in any community, in proportion to the whole, that we need not take them into account for the discussion of the general principles of Political Economy. j6. Producers and consumers. Human beings are considered as either oonsumers or producers. All are consumers. We eat food — we wear out clothes ; and food and clothing are the products of labor. And even in sickness we consume the time of others in taking care of us. Consumption is of two kinds — productive and unproductive. The mechanic that makes wool into cloth — cloth into clothes, etc., consumes the commodities that he works up. This, however, is called productive con- sumption, because the commodity appears the same in substance, though changed in form ; and as a general rule with an increase of intrinsic value. This at least is always intended. Hence all manufac- ture is productive consumption. S8 POLITICAL ECONOMY. jy. Unproductive consumption. A case of unproductive consumption, would be that in which a man eats food, wears clothing, etc., and does nothing — or at least does nothing that in any way increases the value of any commodity or in any way increases the wealth of mankind. 2 8. Producers classified. Producers are of three kinds, (i) agriculturists, (2) manufacturers, and (3) traders. By agriculturists, we mean all those who produce what is called the "raw material." And we call them agriculturists because the material is produced from the earth, and that in one of the three ways, (i) by animal or vegetable growth, or (2) by mining, and (3) by fishing and hunting, and possibly we ought to say lumbering. In the two latter cases the material already exists in a form more or less gross, and needing to be brought into market. In the former case it exists only in the form of chemical elements, minerals in the earth and air, and must be collected and com- bined by the processes of growth and organic com- bination. PERSONS AND WEALTH. 59 jg. The ftmction of agriculturists. The labor of the agriculturist, as such, ceases just as soon as the commodity is collected from the soil and fitted to become an article of trade, to be sold and carried off for consumption or manufacture. And if the producer of the "raw material" carries his commodities to market, he is to that extent act- ing the part of the trader. Now it is manifest from this definition, that this class of producers determine the Quantum, or the first factor, of wealth. For since whoever produces the raw material is an agriculturist, as we have defined the term, nothing can become an article of wealth, or pass into the hands of manufacturers with- out first passing through their hands and receiving from them a portion of labor. 4.0. The function of Manufacturers. The second class of producers to be considered are the manufacturers. The manufacturers are those who take the "raw material" where the agriculturists leave it, and carry- it through the successive transformations it may re- quire, until it is ready for final, or ultimate consump- tion. Thus, the miller manufactures flour out of wheat, the baker manufactures bread out of the 6o POLITICAL ECONOMY. flour, and the bread is ready for final or ultimate consumption. In the same way we can trace every article through one or more transformations until it is fit for use. Now at every stage, the manufacturer adds to the intrinsic value of the article, otherwise, it would be no better for his labor, no body would pay him for the labor he may have bestowed upon it, and he would not perform that labor. /J.!. Their relation to exchangeable value. The manufacturer adds to the exchangeable value also, for a hundred bushels of wheat made into flour, sells for more than the wheat itself Lumber made into cabinet ware, is worth more than the mere lum- ber. Leather made into^i)oots and shoes is worth more than the stock of which they are made. This will be understood, of course, as the general rule. But it will often happen that one will expend labor on what is made no better by his labor, but rather worse thereby, and in some cases entirely "spoilt," as the expression is. But this, however, can only occur in exceptional cases, and even then the person who bestows the labor does it for the most part, if not always, with the expectation and belief that the material he works upon will be made PERSONS AND WEALTH. 6i into something that will at least be worth the labor, in addition to the value of the material before the labor was undertaken. /j^. Limit to the increase of exchangeable value. Hence putting this law of the increase of the two kinds of value into the form of a differential equa- tion, and using Q to denote any fraction whose value is less than unity, and denoting intrinsic value by V\, and exchangeable value by V^, we have, dV2 = ddV^ that is, the increase of the exchangeable value of any article, by any given amount of labor, multiplied by some fraction less than unity, is always equal to the increase of the intrinsic value. Hence the smaller the value of 9, the more beneficial the man- ufacture. And when Q becomes unity, manufacture has reached its limit. 4.J. Limit to tnanufactures. But the increment of the exchangeable value can never exceed the increment of the intrinsic value. For then the labor would be entirely lost and with- ' out reward. We say of such cases, "it costs more than it is worth," the improvement is not worth the labor or trouble it costs to make it. 62 POLITICAL ECONOMY. Here then we have a Hmit to manufacture as a means of wealth. Manufacturers, therefore, create and determine the second factor to wealth, namely, tlie value or quantity of the commodities. Hence we have two principles, (i) Up to a limit already pointed out, that is, so long as labor spent in manufacturing can increase the intrinsic value more than it increases the exchangeable value, the more perfect the manufacture, the greater the wealth of the community. (2) The smaller the number of persons engaged, provided they are sufficient to do all that may be necessary in any community, the better for that community. For, like agriculturists, they add to the number between whom the quantit}' determined by the agriculturists must be divided, and of course, therefore, the more there are of them, the less for the several persons — the less the distributive wealth of the community. /./. Their relation to distributive zvcalth. Hence the wisdom of reducing the number of persons engaged in manufacture as far as possible, provided only that we do not thereby prevent the manufactured articles from being carried to the maximum of intrinsic value. For since the manufacturers add nothino- to the PERSONS AND WEALTH. 63 quantity, they must take a certain portion of that which has been produced by the agriculturists as compensation for their labor, and as a means of support to themselves, and thus, while adding to the aggregate, they diminish the distributive wealth of community. The case of millers in some communities is an il- lustration ; the farmer carries his wheat to mill ; the miller — a manufacturer — grinds it, and takes for his pay one-tenth of the grist. Consequently the farmer has but nine-tenths left. If, now, one miller can grind the wheat for, say, nineteen farmers, he will receive but one-tenth of all the wheat that is raised, and the farmers have each his share of the remain- ing nine-tenths. But if it should take two millers instead of one, each taking as much when there are two of them, as either would have taken when there was but one, they would take two-tenths, or one- fifth of the whole, and each of the others have left only his share of eight-tenths, instead of the same share of nine-tenths as before. The case would be the same in principle, if the farmer should pay the manufacturer in money. For suppose wheat to be the only thing he has, and thus to constitute his entire wealth, he would be obliged to sell a part of it to get the money with which to pay the miller, and thus he might as well give the wheat immediately and directly to the 64 POLITICAL ECONOMY. miller, as to make the other exchange first. Or we may generalize the statement, and supposing the agriculturist to be possessed of any number of com- modities, he must either give part of them directly to the manufacturer — to each manufacturer through whose hands his commodities pass — or sell the same part to get the money with which to pay the man- ufacturer for his labor. Hence, manufacturers, how many or how few soever they may be, are added to the number of the persons in any community, among whom the quantity produced in any community must be dis- tributed — and hence, other things being equal, the more numerous they are, the less will be the dis- tributive wealth in any community. That is, the less there will be for each individual on an equal di- vision. ^^. The function of traders. The third class of producers, are traders. They are the persons who transport the commodities from the producer to the consumer. And, since in order to do so, they usually buy of the one, and sell to the other class, we call them traders. And, besides, transportation is not always an ele- ment — it is only incidental — they move the com- modity from one place to another, if such removal PERSONS AND WEALTH. 65 be necessary. But the man who buys at wholesale, and retails what he has bought, or who buys merely to sell again, without so much as touching or look- ing at what he has bought, is a trader. ^6. Thch' relation to quantity and intrinsic value. Now, the first fact to be considered with regard to traders, is, that they do not add to either the quantity, or the intrinsic value of the articles that make up the wealth of a community. I do not say that they do not add to the aggre- gate wealth of a community, so that the community is the richer for their existence — but what I now say is, that they neither add to the quantity of the ar- ticles that pass through their hands, nor yet do they improve the intrinsic value of those articles. For example : a dealer buys a thousand barrels of flour in one city, and transfers them to another, and sells them there ; the number of barrels does not increase by the way — nor will the flour go any farther towards supporting human life, or promoting human happiness, than if it had been produced on the spot where it is to be consumed. ^7. The ways in wJiich they increase wealth. Trade and exchange then, add to neither of the 5 66 POLITICAL ECONOMY. factors of wealth, directly, nor can they add anything to wealth, save by indirect methods. (i) By carrying commodities from places where they are produced in abundance and with ease, to> places where,, tliough needed, they cannot be pro- duced The people of England, for example, must have clothing, and it is cheaper to carry the cotton of the warmer latitudes, than it would be to raise anything that could be produced in England, to supply the place of cotton goods. The limit to the extent to which traders can in this way add to the wealth of the world, is the dif- ference between the labor of production, at the place of production, and the labor of production at the place where the article is wanted for consumption,, minus the cost of transportation to that place. For purposes of consumption, we are obliged to consider each commodity as capable of being pro- duced, wherever they are wanted for consumption,, with a difference only in the labor cost. By the building of hot-houses, etc., etc., we can raise trop- ical fruits here ; but it is cheaper to raise them where no such appliances are needed, and to bring them here as articles of commerce. (2) One man, as a trader, may often do by way of making exchanges, in a given time, what it would take many men the same amount of time each to do, if each one had it to do for himself FI:J?S02VS and wealth. 67 The office of a mail-carrier, is perhaps the best illustration of this principle. One man can carry the letters, etc., for a whole community, with the same ease and time that he could carry his own. Suppose, for example, that there are fifty letters per day from this place to New York. One man can carry them all, as well as for each one to carry his own. In the same way, the merchant who goes to New York to buy goods, can about as well buy a whole stock for the community in which he lives, as to buy only what he wants for his own consumption. And he thus saves others the expense and labor of going, each one for his own family. The saving by this means, is equal to the saving of time effected by one man's doing for several per- sons what each one would otherwise have to do for himself; for "time is always considered as money." If a man is not doing one thing, it is supposed that he will be doing something else, and making the best use of his time. Since trade adds nothing to the quantity, or the intrinsic value of the commodities it handles, there can be nothing to pay for any labor or outlay of any kind, beyond the limits already stated. So that the moment a merchant goes beyond that limit, and by his labor, raises exchangeable value above in- trinsic value at the place of consumption, he would 68 POLITICAL ECONOMY. lose his labor, or his purchase-money, one or botlij, or a part of each, as ^e might choose to compute it. ^8. Limits to their usefulness. These are the limits beyond which trade, or rather transportation, cannot increase the wealth of the world. But it may be made to increase the wealth of a single nation^ a community, or in individual cases, to a point that bears no relation to the limit just named. England is perhaps an example in point, where trade has enriched a part of the world, far beyond the amount of increment to the general wealth of mankind, by her operations. It is no uncommon thing to hear persons speak of trade and commerce, as that which makes the wealth. Within the limits spoken of, trade does add to the wealth of the world, but no farther. It is indeed true that without trade there can be no great amount of wealth, none, or not many, ac- cumulated fortunes, no large or wealthy commercial cities. But when persons speak of trade as creating or making the wealth, they should amend their ex- pression, and say, not that trade makes it, but that it makes it to be here. It adds something to the amount of wealth in existence ; but it does far more towards accumulating it in certain places, and in the hands of certain persons — a comparatively few rich PERSONS AND WEALTH. 69 persons — than it does towards the increase of the aggregate wealth of the world. It is no unfrequent spectacle to see one person, or one community, getting rich at the expense of the rest of mankind. Hence, still more strongly than in the case of manufactures, the law that, so long as trade is done up to the extent that is necessary for the increase of the wealth of the world in the ways described — or in any other, if there be one — which, however, I do not know of, and cannot even imagine — the fciuci' the number of men engaged in trade, the better for the world : and it will be better generally for each community, also, however great or however small. ^p. Usefulmss of the three classes compared. Agriculturists, therefore, determine the first factor of wealth, the quantity ; and the manufacturers determine the second factor, namely, quality or value ; and for the present occasion, we must con- sider value, as utility or intrinsic value. The trader class, on the other hand, include all persons not be- longing to either of the others, who are of any use in any way ; they really add to the wealth of com- munity indirectly, by saving the time of the pro- ducers — the other two classes. The time thus saved is equal to the labor that can be performed in the time, and is equal to the number of laborers that would be required to perform it. 70 POLITICAL ECONOMY. Traders, without adding to the intrinsic value, do add to the exchangeable value of the commodities that pass through their hands, to the extent of their own labor ; and the limit to the possibility of trade is the difference between the intrinsic and the ex- changeable value of articles as they are when they are finished by the producer. For mere traders cannot force up the exchangeable value of articles above their intrinsic value. Consequently we are to look upon any measures that tend to reduce the number of men and the amount of capital needed for the trade, and for transportation,^ the buying, seUing, and carrying of the world, as a benefit to the cause of human welfare. The means of reducing the men and money needed for exchanges, including the cost of trans- portation and the profits of the traders, are, (i) Bringing the producer and the consumer of any commodity as near together as possible, so as to save transportation, and every stage of increasing density of population is a move in this direction. (2) The number of those that are necessary is diminished, moreover, by increased facilities for transportation, as canals, and railroads, steamships, telegraphs, etc. And the smaller the proportion of persons that will be sufficient to carry exchanges up to this point, the better for the community. For each person that PERSONS AND WEALTH. 71 is unnecessarily so engaged adds one to the divisor, or rather constitutes one of the number that make up the divisor which we have to use in order to ascertain the distributive wealth, one to the number among whom the aggregate wealth must be distrib- uted, without adding anything whatever to the aggregate wealth. 50. The function of inventors. There is indeed another class of persons who at first sight may appear to deserve a special recogni- tion among the creators of wealth, the inventors. They certainly can not be included among the agri- culturists, or the manufacturers, though' agricultur- ists and manufacturers are often inventors and discoverers. They are hardly to be considered as traders, and yet their usefulness and function in aid- ing the creation of wealth, is of the same kind, and comes under the same law as that of the traders. By their discoveries and inventions they enable men to accomplish results with less time and ex- penditure than they could have done without such inventions and discoveries. Hence like the traders, by saving time they contribute indirectly to the pro- duction of value. 72 POLITICAL ECONOMY. 5/ All the population referred to the three classes. There remain for consideration, several classes of persons in eveiy civilized community, which do not appear thus far to have been "located," to use a cant phrase. These are the men who labor indeed, but do not appear to be laboring upon the inanimate, or rather the impersonal objects we have been considering as making up wealth. They may be classed as, (i) teachers, (2) preachers or priests, (3) physicians, (4) lawyers, and (5) officials. Bankers, brokers, etc., are of course traders. The first then, I think, should be classed with manufacturers. They labor on, or for, men, it is true, and man is not usually considered as an article of property, or as having exchangeable value. But we shall see bye-and-bye that both soul and body, as means and instruments of labor, come under the general law of capital as a means of pro- ducing value, and thus have an exchangeable value of their own. To a man anxious to realize the products of labor by means of the labor itself, often skill, a spiritual or mental quality, is of more value than the tools or machinery. Tools and machinery are worth but little, if anything, without strength and skill to use them. PERSONS AND WEALTH. 73 Now the legitimate sphere of the teacher, is to improve the mind — the skill ; and that of the phy- sician, is to improve the body, or strength, and this is true none the less, on account of the fact that he is needed only in case of sickness or accident. So, too, the preacher and the priest — if he so ad- ministers his office as to have any right to subsist at all — is a means of improving the soul, not only pro- moting the happiness, by the gratification of the religious instincts, but also, by connecting moral teachings with religious convictions and feelings, improving the moral character of the people, and thus increasing their intrinsic value. As a means of production, the skill imparted by the teacher has a value that is readily appreciated and acknowledged. But the labors of the preacher, the man who makes moral culture, honesty among men, as a contributor to the intrinsic and produc- tive value of man, is not so generally appreciated. But in his capacity as a teacher and promoter of good morals, he is an economic benefit in another way. Like the policeman who protects our prop- erty, and thus saves us whatever time and expense would be necessary to do it for ourselves, and with far inferior results — the preacher, to the extent of the influence of his office, accomplishes the same thing. He helps to make life and property secure, and thus saves us the necessity for much of the time and care 74 POLITICAL ECONOMY. and labor and anxiety, that would otherwise be re- quisite to protect what we have, and he thus enables us to devote the time and labor to production with in- crease of results. The two classes last named, lawyers and officials, belong as I think, with equal certainty, to the class of traders. The first class, lawyers, are necessary that people may know their rights, how to deport themselves in their dealings with one another. And a lawyer, by being learned in the law, and so, ready to answer the questions of several hundred clients, on the in- stant of their asking, saves them the time that would be requisite to investigate, each one for himself, or the still greater risk of doing wrong from not having investigated the law. Officials are those who are engaged in making and administering the laws — including, therefore, legislators, assemblymen, congressmen, senators, etc., judges, executive officers of all grades, and the army and navy ; these are necessary to make, in- terpret officially, and to enforce the laws, so that the innocent may be protected, and all persons may possess, use, and enjoy the products of their own labor. Like traders, they save labor by making the products of labor secure to the laborers themselves. It will take less labor to support a family when the PERSONS AND WEALTH. 75 laborers are so protected, than when a share of it is subject to the depredations of thieves and robbers, and the earnings of each one is diminished thereby. Again, they save labor by reheving the population to a large extent of the necessity of providing se- curity against fraud and violence. A "safe" that is burglar proof, if such a thing can be produced, costs thousands of dollars. A police administration that would protect the property, would render this ex- pense unnecessary. CHAPTER IV. OF THE FORCES OF NATURE IN RELATION TO WEALTH. Reduction of prices — Limit to the decrease — The use of tools and machinery — Their relation to the forces of nature — The forces of nature defined — The forces of nature gratuitous — They are inexhaustible — Conditions of their use — Extent of their useful- ness — Man's position in nature — Effect of machinery on price — Why not uniform in its influence — Recapitulation and sum- mary — Elements of the labor of production — Land both a tool and a force — Ricardo's theory of rent — Criticisms on the theory — Land never costs more than the average cost of reproduction — How far Ricardo's theory correct — Effect of a limit to the supply of land — What makes the price of land — Land rises in price with cultivation — New intrinsic values with increased population — Increased value of human labor — Exchangeable value referred to its elements — Taxes and insurance — Com- modities become cheaper. 52. Reduction of prices. There are several considerations that tend to re- duce the average cost of reproduction with the advance of civilization. FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 77 (i) The utilization of nezv materials. The appli- cation of iron where only brass had been used before — the introduction of maize or Indian corn, and potatoes, as articles of food, after the discovery of America — the use of cotton as a material for clothing — are all examples of the fact that the addition of any new material to those already in use for the supply of articles in its kind — as corn and potatoes for food — cotton for clothing — reduces the cost of a supply of the articles of that class to the consumers. (2) The second, and by far the greatest, is the utilization of any force of nature by which the amount of human labor needed for the production of commodities of any class, is made less. The application of machinery, propelled by water or steam, to the manufacture of cloth, is an example. Many articles cost less than one-fourth as much now, as articles of the same quality did before this improvement in the process of manufacture. jj". Limit to the decrease. In case, however, there is a limit to the supply of raw material which man can not overcome, we shall have a reversal of this law. Thus in England the supply of coal is limited, and as the point of exhaustion approaches, the 78 POLITICAL ECONOMY. amount of labor necessary to mine it and get it to market, must increase. And so if the quantity is not actually limited beyond the power of man to reproduce it, as in the case of all forms of minerals, there may be a limitation of another kind which will increase the labor of reproduction. Take for example, the case of whale-oil — and again those vegetable products which require many years to re- place them when once exhausted — as pine lumber, and the average cost of reproduction will be an in- creasing one. 5^. The use of tools ajid machmery. Man as a Iboorer can do but little without the aid of strength other than his own. Hence we find him, even in the rudest and lowest state, making and using "tools." Tools are but implements for utilizing the forces of nature. Both words, "tools" and "machinery," are in use. But for the purposes of Political Economy there is no difference between them. In common use, how- ever, we call that a "machine" in which there is a combination of parts, changing relation in reference to each other. While that which consists of parts so united that they do not work upon one another, as in the case of the axe and its helve — the adze FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 79 and its handle — the scythe and its snathe, — we call each of these simply a "tool." 55, TJieir relation to the forces of nature. Tools and machines are not forces, but only means for utilizing forces ; the real forces of nature, which man has utilized are animals, the wind, streams of water, steam, etc. A tool is not usually considered as using up this force, nor even of the muscular force of man him- self When a man throws a stone, he uses a force of nature. In pounding and driving with a hammer or sledge, he uses the same force. The savage who hunts with his bow and arrows, and the watch- maker who cuts his main-springs to propel the wheels of the watch, alike use the forces of nature. A "machine," on the other hand, running as it always does, with more or less of friction, uses up a part of the force that propels it. It takes some part of the force, as in case of water-wheels and steam- engines, to propel the machinery itself. ^6. The forces of nature defined. The real forces in all these cases, and in fact, the only real forces any where, are substantial objects — water, wind, the earth, and the visible and tangi- 8o POLITICAL ECONOMY. ble objects that are around us. In fact, there is no material object, mineral plant or animal, that is not, in some relations and for some purposes, a force. The mind of man is a force, and one of the most important forces in nature. Even God himself is a force. But in this connection, we are speaking only of those forces that are subject to man. And as most of these objects are forces in dif- ferent senses, and for different purposes, in the va- rious conditions and relations of which they are susceptible, as water when running, air or wind when blowing, steam when confined, iron when magnetic — it is more common to speak of the ab- stractions — Jicat, gravity, electricity, etc., as the real forces, and no harm can come from such a use of terms, so far as mere Political Economy is concerned. But the fact to be noted is, that neither, tools nor machinery, are forces. The forces of nature, as we have said, are various ; they are for the most part, running water, wind and steam, and tools and ma- chines are merely the means of using these forces. 57. The forces of nature gratuitous. Now, the fundamental fact is, that these forces are grat?iitous, they have no exchangeable \^alue, they cost nothing ; and the only cost in using them is the labor of making the tools, machinery and other ap- paratus necessar}- for their utilization and use. FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 8i This would result from the definition of value, intrinsic and exchangeable, already given. But it results also from another consideration. Take the case of a steam-engine. When we have taken out the cost of the engine, of the fuel, the oil, etc., the labor, if any, in providing for a supply of water, as -digging a well, laying an aqueduct, etc., we have reckoned all that costs anything for the running of the engine, except of course, thjp labor of tending and using it We bestow no labor on the forces themselves, and consequently they have no ex- changeable value ; they have intrinsic value indeed, but they cost really nothing. The engine, the fuel, oil, etc., necessary to utilize them, take time and labor, and they cost something. ^8, They arc inexhaustible. The forces are inexhaustible. This results from the fact that man can only change the form of ma- terials, he can neither create nor destroy. Nor can he change the fundamental or ultimate properties of bodies. He may expand water into steam ; but the steam will condense into water again, and then is ready for another expansion. He may burn wood and coal, and thus convert them into carbonic acid gas, vapor, and residuary earthy matter in the form of ashes ; but these very materials will combine 6 82 POLITICAL ECONOMY. again in the processes of vegetable growth, and form combustible matter, ready to be burned as before. The manufacturer of cutlery, far example, con- sumes steel and coal, the coal he burns and con- sumes, the steel he manufactures into wares that he offers for sale. He uses a steam-engine, etc., in order to utilize the force with which water, heated to boiling point, expands, and the force propels the machinery. But the steam immediately becomes water again, and the elements into which the coal is resolved by combustion, unite again in reproduction of living trees and plants. 59, Conditions of their ttse. If now man can accomplish more in a given period by producing these tools, etc., and then using them in guiding the forces of nature, than he could without, this use of machinery is a gain to the cause of wealth. It produces a given value with less human labor than it could have been produced for without. 60. Extent of their usefulness. To give some idea of the extent of this help to man in his labor, I mention the fact that it has been FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 83 computed that the "machine force," as it is called, that is, the efficiency of the forces of nature, and ■chiefly, water, wind, and steam, utilized in manufac- tures in Great Britain, is equal to about twenty times the muscular force of all the inhabitants in that kingdom. That is, the people are able, in the aggre- gate, to do twenty times as much with machinery, as they could do without the aid of these forces which are utilized to them by means of machinery. But even this must be a very inadequate estimate, for it includes only the use of such forces as water, and steam, and wind, used in the propulsion of machinery. If then we consider the increment of efficiency given to man's labor by the use of tools, as they are called, we should arrive at a very differ- ent result, and no adequate estimate of it could be made. In the analysis of the labor that enters into the cost of the commodities we buy, I have taken no note of the fact that the price of an article is often for a time, and at a particular place, forced up far beyond what would thus be indicated, by the efforts of what are called, "speculators." Doubtless such things occur, and they are as exceptional and abnor- mal in the estimate of Political Economy, as they are heartless and wicked in a moral and philan- thropic point of view. ^ Political Economy, however, is not responsible for S4 POLITICAL ECONOMY. these things, and can take no notice of them except as of evils to be removed. 6i. Man' s position in nature. Hence it would seem that man's work in this world is that of an engineer, to guide the forces of nature ; to tame and utilize them, and make them do his work for him ; to use his strength, whatever it may be, in guiding them, that they may bear his burdens, and draw his loads, push his tools, and drive his machinery for him, rather than to do this heavier work himself; they are the wild horse which he is to catch and tame, and the tools and machinery are but the bridle and the harness with which the brute may be made to drag his loads and carry his bur- dens, and carry even himself, also, as a rider. Human labor may be regarded as a constant fac- tor, but the materials, utilized, and the forces of nature subjugated and made available for their pro- duction and manufacture, are variable. Hence denoting the cost of any article in any particular class by C, and the materials utilized by M, and the machine-force by F, we have this dif- ferential equation, d(Mx F) = —dC Th^t is, every improvement in the materials utilized, or in the machinery used, will cause a correspond- FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 85 ing decrease in the cost of that particular article, and by consequence, in all the articles of its class, and then by degrees, in the cost of all other articles though not of its kind. 62. Effect of machinery on price. Thus the discovery of cotton and the invention of the machinery for making cotton goods, have re- duced the price of all clothing materials, silk and woolen as well as cotton ; and by releasing labor from the production of commodities used for cloth- ing, it has increased the supply of labor for the pro- duction of other things, and thus reduced their prices also. This reduction in price, however, as already said, will not occur when there is in the na- ture of things a limit to the possibility of increasing the supply. In such cases the price will rise under the law of supply and demand, and the exchange- able value is likely to rise also, because of the in- creased difficulty of procuring a given quantity of the article, the more we approach the limit of its final exhaustion, until the price shall have reached the highest intrinsic value of the article for any use whatever. 6j. Why not uniform in its influence. Again the reduction in the average price will not S6 POLITICAL ECONOMY. be uniform in all commodities. And in some it may not be apparent because of an increase in the intrinsic value. The best quality of cloth in market now, may be no cheaper than the best cloth was many years ago ; but then it is better than could have been bought then at any price. In fact this increase in the in- trinsic value given to all articles by the superiority in the process of manufacture, goes far to obscure the important law we are discussing. Again there is another reason why reduction in the average price of articles will not be uniform. It will be greatest in those things in the production of which machinery can be used to the greatest extent, and with the greatest advantage. Hence the reduction in the price of agricultural products, and of ''raw material" generally, may not be very great. In some articles there may be no reduction. And in some, under the influence of the law of limitation spoken of, there may be indeed an increase of price. And in regard to manufactured goods, the reduc- tion will be most apparent, and if we allow for the increase of intrinsic value or improvement in quality already spoken of, the reduction will be the great- est in the most highly manufactured commodities. And yet, even this difference will not be so great as the difference in extent to which the ma- FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 87 chinery is used. And it is quite possible that in some cases the increase in the intrinsic value may be so great that there will be no reduction in the price of the article. In other cases, the article will be poorer and very much cheaper. This is probably the case with shoes and clothing made by machinery. But taking all things together, the general law stated with regard to a reduction of prices just in proportion to a reduction in the amount of human labor, will hold good. Prices have a wonderful power of equalizing them- selves. The release of some laborers from manu- factures and trade will increase the number that will be devoted to agriculture, and thus produce an effect on the price of agricultural commodities also. 64^ Recapitulation attd summary. Having now arrived at a very important result in regard to the cost of the commodities most in de- mand in any civilized country, it may be well to re- call and recapitulate the most important steps we have taken. (i) Every object in nature has intrinsic value. The first class of laborers — the producers — give to articles exchangeable value, increase their intrinsic value, and determine their amount. (2) The second class, the manufacturers, increase 83 POLITICAL ECONOMY. both the intrinsic and the exchangeable value, though the latter less than the former, they deter- mine the intrinsic value, but they add nothing to the amount. (3) The third class, the traders-, increase the ex- changeable value, but they add to neither the in- trinsic value nor the amount of the commodities they deal with. They add to the wealth of the community only by saving the time and labor that would otherwise be required to accomplish what they, in their appropriate way, perform-. 6^, Elements of the labor of production. What we pay for when we purchase an article, is simply human labor. This may be resolved into several elements, in order that the truth of the propo- sition may be more readily seen. (i) The labor actually expended by each of the classes, producers, manufacturers and traders. (2) The labor actually bestowed in making the tools, machinery, etc., by means of which the forces of nature were utilized and made to do man's work in each of these departments — or rather that part of the tools, etc., which was ttsedup, worn away and destroyed by the labor actually bestowed on the article, whose price may happen to be under con- sideration. FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 89 In the wages paid to the immediate laborers, as the producers, the manufacturers and the farmers, there is inchided the three-fold element. (i) The amount which they must pay for, (a) the food they consume, (b) the clothes they wear out, (c) the houses in which they live, as well as (d) cer- tain other incidental and inevitable personal ex- penses. Something of each of these items must ^nter into the cost of the production of every com- modity that has exchangeable value at all — and all of them cost labor, or the products of labor, and cost only the labor that is put into them. (2) That portion of the increment of the aggre- gate wealth of the community which, under the or- dinary name of "profits," goes, or should go, to each laborer as something more than is needed for food, clothing, etc., as specified above, and which by care, frugality, and economy on his part becomes Jiis wealth, his private property, his fortune, his means of independence, which he can use as capital to increase the productiveness of his own labor, or as means to promote his own ease and comfort, his culture and the improvement of his own social po- sition. 66. Land both a tool and a force. Among the means that man can or does use, there 90 POLITICAL ECONOMY, is none in more constant use — none more indis- pensable than lafid itself. When we consider that food is the first want of man in an economic point of view, the first thing to be sought and the last to be relinquished, when supplies begin to fail, and the further fact that man can eat only that which has been put into organic form, either vegetable or animal, and that no veg- etable or animal matter can be produced without the aid of soil — we see at once that soil or cultivated land must be the great force of nature upon which man depends. It is that which makes plants and animals grow for his use. In the first place, it is necessary for us to con- sider whether land used for agricultural purposes is to be regarded as a "force," or a "tool" by which we use the force, and whether in fact it be not both in one. Perhaps we shall find a solution of the difficulty in the fact that it is both, and that the writers have failed of the right conclusion by not properly so regarding it. Doubtless land is a force ; for without man, it brings forth plants, and causes the elements to unite into organic forms, and thus produces results, plants and animals, that are of inestimable intrinsic value. But it is also a "tool," an implement, or a ma- chine by which man is able to unite these elements into the forms in which they serve him for food and FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 91 clothing, and nameless other purposes, as he could not unite them, and they would not be united, with- out. He cannot eat the chemical elements, or the mineral compounds. And much of what the un- cultivated soil produces will serve him no better. He depends upon the soil for vegetable food, and upon it, too, for the growth of that which will supply him with animal food. Hence, as a force of nature, it may be gratuitous, while as a '^ tool," or means of utilizing the heat, light, etc., that combine the elements needed to con- stitute food and clothing, it may have an exchange- able value or be subject to rent. dy. Ricardo's theory of re^it. Ricardo defines rent to be the amount that is paid for the intrinsic properties of the soil. He illustrated and proved his proposition in this way. At the first settlement of a country, the settlers naturally select the best and most productive lands. In the next generation more land is needed, and land of a poorer quality will of necessity be taken into culture. Land No. i, that which was first taken up, will come to have a rent equal to the difference between its productive powers and those of No. 2. Soon, with the increase of population, more land is wanted and No. 3 is taken. The rent 92 POLITICAL ECONOMY. on No. I now is raised by an amount equal to the difference between No. 2 and No. 3, and No. 2 comes to have a rent equal to the difference between No. 2 and No. 3, and so on until all the land that will produce enough to support the cultivators, or pay for the labor of cultivation, is taken up. 68. Criticisms on the theory. Our answer is two-fold. (i) First, in regard to the fact, it is not true that the earliest settlers take the most productive land. They generally begin on the hill slides, or hill tops, where the woods are easily cleared, and where they are free from the dampness and malaria of the lower but more productive soils. So that what they naturally begin with is, on the whole, about the average in point of natural productiveness. Proof of this may be seen anywhere in our country ; and in all countries the most productive lands are generally those that need most labor to bring them into culti- vation, clear them off, under-drain them, and other- wise make them susceptible of culture. (2) But in the second place, land, like other com- modities that are bought and sold, never costs more, and seldom costs so much as the average value of the labor needed to reproduce it. In the midst of Africa, or Australia, land in a FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 93 state of nature, and as good as can be found any- where, has, nevertheless, no exchangeable value — no price ; nobody buys or sells land there. But let civilized man make his appearance, clear off the forests, and put the soil in a state for culture, and the land has a price. Let towns be built, and roads constructed ; churches, school-houses, etc., be erected — all of them products of human labor — and with every added day's labor on these public im- provements, every foot of land rises in exchangeable value. 6g. Land never costs more than the average cost of reproduction. But it never rises above the standard already laid down, the amount of labor thus expended upon it, or rather the average cost of reproduction. The real estate of New York State, was estimated, in 1850, at $1,200,000,000. This would pay for the labor of one million of men for four years, working three hundred days in a year, at one dollar per day. But manifestly that amount of labor would not change the. State of New York from what it was when Europeans first settled it, to what it is now. Consequently the State could have been bought in 1850, for less than the cost of the human labor used up in making the improvements upon it. 94 POLITICAL ECONOMY. The real estate of Great Britain is estimated at about $10,000,000,000: this would pay the wages of four million men for ten years, at the rate of two hundred dollars per year. But that amount does not represent the labor that has changed England from what it was in the days of Julius Caesar, to what it is now. Nor could that amount, with all modern improvements of tools and machinery, re- produce an England, if we had the raw materials and the opportunity to reproduce it. The same will undoubtedly be found to be the case with any portion of land that is so large that its inhabitants may be regarded as a nation or com- munity by itself And this fact is important, for there is no one farm or small tract of land whose price is determined by itself, its own condition, and the improvements upon it alone, regardless of its surroundings. If now the money value of the real estate of a country be less than the cost of the labor that would be required to reproduce the improvements that are upon it, it is manifest that in buying it we pay for only the labor and not fully for even that. 'JO. How far Ricardds theory correct. It is undoubtedly true, however, that whatever may be our theory of rent, the piece of land v/hich is FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 95 most productive, will command the highest rent, whether the superiority in this respect is owing to natural differences, or to the skill and labor of those who have had the direction of its use and culture in past years. To this extent Ricardo's theory is in accordance with fact. But there is another important fact that the theory overlooks. In case lands No. i and No. 2 were per- fectly equal in natural fertility, yet any person wish- ing to use land would doubtless prefer to pay rent for No. I, which is already under cultivation, rather than take No. 2 for nothing ; and the rent in this case would be equal to the labor required to put No. 2 in as good a condition as No. i is in already. And this accords with the facts I have just stated ; but it hardly accords with Ricardo's theory. 7/. Effects of a limit to the supply of land. There is, however, one modification of the law of "exchangeable value equals the average cost of reproduction," which we must take special notice of sometime, and which may possibly have an applica- tion to cases of land as subject to this law. It is this. Where there is a limit to the possibility of reproduction, price, under the law of supply and demand, will rise permanently above exchangeable value, and intrinsic value must take the place of it in our calculations. 96 POLITICAL ECONOMY. And although there are stih miUions of acres un- occupied, yet something of the effect and operation of this law is already felt in most of the old coun- tries of the world, and will be felt in each country as its population gets to be pretty dense, and its land quite fully brought under cultivation. Attachment to country, and the cost of emigration, will induce many to pay for land at home, more than it is really worth, more than it would cost to make a new home elsewhere, rather than go to a new country and leave all they hold so dear behind. yz. What makes the price of land. Land, therefore, is both a force and a tool. As a force it is gratuitous, as a tool it has cost man more than the average cost of reproduction, and can be bought for less. The formula thus far developed, however, will not be sufficient to determine the price of any particular piece "of land. For particular pieces we have to take into account, (i) the labor spent on it, (2) the labor spent on the land around it. Every house that is built in the neighborhood to be inhabited by man ; every road that is built, in- creasing the facilities of getting to market; every public building, as school house, church, etc. ; and in fact every public work or improvement of any FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 97 kind, adds something to the value of every foot and acre of land in the immediate neighborhood of the place where it is built Nor is this influence confined within any narrow hmits. The removal of an obstruction in the Hud- son river, for example, whereby the time and risk of transportation between Albany and New York, is diminished, adds value to every foot of land in all the north-western part of our country from which any commodity, agricultural or mineral, may come to New York for consumption, or through New York, to enter the commerce of the world. 7J. La7id rises in pri^e -with cultivation. Another consideration occurs, as modifying the price of land, namely, while all other commodities tend constantly towards a lower exchangeable value, as civilization advances, and population becomes more dense, land, on the other hand, is constantly tending upwards, demanding a higher price per acre, is constantly rising in exchangeable value. But the exception is only apparent. In all other cases we buy the finished product, and compare such product with another, as a coat, a hat, or pair of boots, etc., with the same articles as finished and fit for wear, or final consumption. In the case of land, however, we compare not one 7 gS POLITICAL ECONOMY. article with another of the same kind, but the same article with itself in different stages of its manu- facture. In an advancing civilization, with a population in- creasing in density, something is done every year on the land or around it, to improve its value, to carry it towards a higher state of perfection, and to give it an increased intrinsic value, as a means of getting a living and supplying human wants. It is as if we would compare the material for a coat, in the suc- cessive stages of its manufacture, from the time when it is but undre&sed wool, just clipped from the sheep's back, up to the time when it is ready to be put on and worn. Doubtless, at each successive stage, we should find it increasing in value and in price, as at each, more labor will have been bestowed upon it, ^y. New intrinsic values with increasing popula- tion. There is still another reason why land should be constantly commanding higher prices, in an advanc- ing civilization. To say nothing of its increasing intrinsic value as building lots, the products that are raised upon it, even if no more per acre in quantity, command a higher price. The proximity to market reduces the cost of transportation and exchanges, so that a given amount of labor on a piece of land, in FORCES OF NATURE AND WEALTH. 99 a thickly populated district, though the land will produce no more bushels of wheat, etc., will never- theless, produce more money, in consequence of the wheat's commanding a higher price. It has happened in our country, that while wheat was worth one dollar and a half in New York, it was not worth enough to pay the cost of cutting and threshing it in Minnesota. The English writers are extremely unwilling to admit this doctrine of rent. In fact I do not re- collect a single one of them that has admitted it Thus Mill (B. I. ch. I. § 2): "Rent is a price paid for a natural agency." It is the result of a monopoly. needs and expenditures. The man, for example,, who pays fifty dollars for a coat, when one that could be made for thirty would answer just as well, throws away and wastes the twenty dollars as completely as the man whom we have just supposed building a house and then burning it to ashes. It is indeed true that the money goes into the circulation, but it might as well be paid for no labor or thrown into the sea^ so far as the welfare of the community and its distributive wealth are con- cerned. With every increase of wealth and population,, there will be an increase of "waste," which will of course operate to diminish the rate of increase to the increment of distributive wealth. As an example of this waste, I will mention the fact, that it is computed that about one-twentieth or five per cent, of all the labor spent in agriculture, is devoted to raising the simple article of tobacco. Perhaps another commodity consumes another as large a per cent., I mean stimulants in the shape of alcoholic and fermented liquors, opium, etc. And there can be but little doubt that of this one branch of human labor, ninety-nine one-hundredths are waste. One per cent, of it would produce all of those commodities for which mankind is in any way the better off. POPULATION AND WEALTH. 137 Or again : it was reported a few years ago from the Agricultural Bureau at Washington, that it had been concluded as the result of a careful estimation, that the cost of keeping the number of dogs actually kept in the United States, amounted to over thirty millions of dollars annually. I think this an instance of very great waste, for I do not believe that all the skins of all the dogs in the country would be worth at the very highest possible estimate, over the half of one million of dollars. It is not my design, or my wish, in these remarks to inculcate any mere Gradgrind utilitarianism, or in- sinuate the doctrine that all that men really need is food and clothing, and the plainer and cheaper the better. On the contrary, I believe that that which is spent, if properly spent, for social, intellectual, and moral culture, and for the refinement of the taste, is among the very best and most proper expenditures we can make. I think that manhood and woman- hood, strong and noble manhood, and gentle and graceful womanhood, are the very best and most valuable commodities society can produce ; the very best things for which labor and money can be spent. I am speaking only of those expenditures and out- lays which consume and dissipate revenue, without accomplishing any of those objects. It makes no- body better, nobody really happier, or more highly cultivated. But it is an immense drain upon the 138 POLITICAL ECONOMY. income and resources of many of the most advanced nations of the earth. 106. Unproductive capital. For this reason many writers, and among them John Stuart Mill, are inclined to speak of capital as not the same as distributive or aggregate wealth. He regards capital as only that portion of the wealth which they that hold it are inclined to use in aid of labor to be employed in reproduction. And it is this "capital," or wealth in this sense, that, as he says, increases less rapidly than population, so that in all the old countries of the world there are more laborers than are wanted. This may be a fact. It certainly seems to be the case in England. But this will depend upon the ratio of what I call "waste,'' to that which he calls "capital." We have seen that, beyond all question, the rate of increase of the products of labor in England, is greater than the rate of increase in population. If their political institutions and social notions are such as to necessitate or allow of the increase of that por- tion of the annual increment of wealth, which goes to "waste'' at such a rate as to lower the increment of "capital," in Mill's sense of the word, the result he speaks of may ensue. But who is to blame for it, God or man ? POPULATION AND WEALTH. 139 If a comparatively few owning all the land, and monopolizing the increase of wealth, choose to spend it in waste, to employ or not, as they please, their fellow countrymen, to shut them off from every foot of land, exclude them from the mines, and turn them out of the factories in the exercise of their right of ownership, it is certainly true as Mill holds, that it is the amount of "capital" (not wealth) that determines the amount of labor that can be per- formed, and the number of laborers that can be employed. And of course, therefore, there may be an excess of laborers, not an excess, indeed, when compared with the laws of nature, but only an ex- cess when compared with the pleasure of the British aristocracy. Of course the effects of this kind of waste are much the same everywhere, wherever they occur, whether in London, Paris, or New York. loy. Moral influence of having the producer and consumer near together. There is also a moral influence arising from bring- ing the producer and consumer together, by in- creasing density of population, which it is worjih while to notice in passing. When population is dense, and the consumer and producer are neighbors and each acquainted with the other, there is an ob- ligation, not to say a motive, to honesty, which does I40 POLITICAL ECONOMY. not exist where they are unknown to each other. The producer of shoes, for example, who is at work in a village on the Atlantic coast, making shoes for the people in the valley of the Mississippi, or still further off, knows nothing of the people who are to wear them, and probably cares little or nothing about them. His object is to make as much money out of them as he can. Hence the temptation to cheat. But if his ware is to be used by his neighbors, who know him, who buy of him, and of whom he buys in turn, he is bound to honesty and good con- duct. For this reason it is, that whenever we go into a shoe-store, or a clothing-store, we expect to pay, and are wilHng to pay more for an article of domestic manufacture, one -made by the man of whom we buy it, than we will pay for what are called "sale shoes," "sale clothes," etc., knowing full well that they are often made to sell, rather than to wear. CHAPTER VI. OF RENT AND WAGES. Wealth the product of three elements — English use of rent, wages, and profit — Effects on Political Economy — Really but two parties — Capitalists and laborers — Their necessity to each other — Rent, wages, and profit — The contract between the parties — The law of supply and demand — The law of competition — The effect of these laws on prices — May not act instantaneously — The force of habit on prices — The law of supply and demand will produce a supply — Will distribute laborers to their various callings — Will regulate wages among the different employments — Time a factor of wages — Time also a factor in rent — The result reached by another process — Every laborer wants all he can get — The higher wages of skilled labor — Exceptions to the law — Effect of constancy of occupation — Second law determin- ing the rate of wages — Average cost of reproduction will not explain them — In what sense wages equal in all departments — This just as well as necessary — Different rates of rent — Relation of rent to interest — Rate of interest decreases with increase of capital — Depends rather on value than amount — Important law of distribution — Capitalists cannot defeat this law — Equality between rent and wages — The same result reached in another way — Causes that retard the operation of the law — Predom- inance of labor. We have thus far considered the nature and the production of wealth. 142 POLITICAL ECONOMY. 1 08. Wealth the prodiLct of three elements. We have seen that into the production of wealth there enters, (i) the forces and materials of nature, (2) capital used as tools and machinery, (3) labor. Of these three, the first adds no element to the exchangeable value, or to the cost of the articles to the consumer : the second, capital, in so far as it has exchangeable value or cost, is a product of labor, and may always be resolved into an equivalent of labor. In most or all the countries of the old world, there are three classes of persons, (i) laborers who own nothing, and are expected to do all the viamial labor, or "the work," as it it is called in the more popular use of language : (2) the aristocracy who own the land and most of the fixed capital, and who are expected to do nothing : and, (3) the middlemen, sometimes called with reference to English usage, "farmers," who own all the movable capital — the money, etc., that is to be used in reproduction — and who are expected to do nothing more than hire the laborers, and look after the general management of the industrial pursuits. log. English use of rent, zvages, and profit. Hence, of course, there are always three parties RENT AND WAGES. 143 to be considered, and three rival claims to be ad- justed in any theory for the distribution of the products of labor and capital. In such a constitution of society these three parts are called, (i) wages, or the portion that goes to the laborers, (2) rent, that portion that goes to the capitalist, (3) profit, oi'the part that goes to the middleman or farmer. The fundamental fact in such a state of society is a landed aristocracy, a class of men, usually but few in number in comparison, who own all the land, and who, in consequence of their proprietary rights, can give employment or shut out from employment, as it suits their convenience or their caprices, the la- borers of the land, and who, by possession of hered- itary political rights, or by the limitation of the right of suffrage, possess the power of making the laws and shaping the entire policy of the nation in their own interest. In many cases, and especially in England, this aristocracy have associated with them in interest and sympathy those, who, from among the commonalty, have arisen to the possession of great wealth, or to such an eminent influence as to be a desirable acquisition to their ranks. If now, this is to be regarded as the natural state of things, one that ought to be perpetuated, nothing better or different can be desired than some of the more recent of the British productions in the de- partment of Political Economy. First and foremost 144 POLITICAL ECONOMY. amongst these is the work of John Stuart Mill. All his examples and illustrations are drawn from such a state of society. It presents nearly all the facts that he takes into consideration, and all of them that he seems to consider as normal and legitimate ; and all of his doctrines seem to have been shaped with a view to justify and perpetuate such a state of things, with of course some changes by way of im- provement in its workings and results. Hence, in his opinion, the consideration of utility and intrinsic value is of no account ; the distinction between price and exchangeable value of no further use than to give us two terms, where one would answer as well ; the price or value of an article is the measure and result of the difficulty of getting it, and not a compensation for the labor that has pro- duced it. Capital determines the amount of labor that will be done, since no man can labor without the aristocracy and the capital of the middlemen : and that there may be capital and profits so that the laborers can be kept supplied with labor, the rate of wages must be kept down. And the lower classes must be compelled to forego the comforts of home and domestic life, lest they become too numerous, and so a burden upon the capitalists. But surely this is not the state of society amongst us, nor the genius of our institutions. Here we have no "landed aristocracy," in the old-world sense RENT AND WAGES. 145 of the word. We have but very few middlemen and no need of any. Nearly every capitalist per- forms some labor, and employs as many laborers as he can, if he chooses to do so ; and nearly every laborer owns some capital, and is welcome to all he can honestly acquire, and will use wisely and well. And the whole genius of our country and its institu- tions is to elevate the laborer, so that he may become a capitalist to the extent, at least, of owning all that he needs to use, and is essential to a self-respecting manhood and the management of his own affairs. Now without attempting, in this place, any com- parison of the relative merits of the two systems of nationality, or making any effort to vindicate our own, it is manifest that we must have a Political Economy which is, in practice at least, quite differ- ent in many respects from the English. Theoretically, doubtless, the principles of the sci- ence should be derived from facts and definitions that are irrespective of any special nationality, and de- signed rather to correct and improve those that are wrong, than to perpetuate any one as it is, unless it is just right as it is now. 112. Capitalists and laborers. It is, however, customary to speak of the capital as owned by one person, and the labor as performed ,10 146 POLITICAL ECONOMY. by another. This distinction is convenient for the sake of discussion, but it is not essential or impor- tant for any law or result. When the capital is owned by one man, and the labor performed by another, some division of the products, some dis- tribution, of what are called the "profits," must be made between them. Whereas, if the laborer owns his capital^ he receives the whole income to himself It is, however, vastly important to ascertain the law that determines the proportion that shall go to each. It is manifest that each party must have some portion. 1 1 J. Tkeir necessity to each other. The laborer, if he be only a laborer, can not work without being indebted to some one else for capital. Not only must he have tools — which he must borrow if he does not own them, (and if he does he is so far a capitalist) — but he must have something to work upon, a piece of ground to till, stone to ham- mer, lumber to work up, etc., etc., all of which are capital. Since all commodities that have passed from the farmer's and miner's hands have exchange- able value ; and all land, for farming and mining purposes, has nozv come to be owned by somebody, and to have consequently a price and an exchange- able value, there is nothing now with which, or on RENT AND WAGES. 147 which, work can be done, that is, not owned by- somebody. The capitalist can not eat what he has, or if he could he would soon exhaust his store and be with- out supplies. If he goes to work with it, he ceases, thereby, to be simply a capitalist. His true policy, therefore, is to rent his capital to some one who is desirous of using it as a means of producing value ; and of course he will do so, only on condition that he can get a share of what is produced. 11^. Rejit, tvagcs, and profit. We call that portion of the increment of any operation that goes to the capitalist, ivhoi the amount is agreed upon before liand, and does not depend at all upon the amount of the increment, rent ; and the other part in this case, we cd\\ profit, or in case it is a minus quantity, loss. Hence if we let R denote rent, P profit, and / the increment, we have /= R-\- F and as R is in this case constant, we have dl=d P that is, the rate of profits is equal to the rate of the increment. We call that portion that goes to the laborer, when it is agreed upon before hand, and does not depend upon the amount of increment, or the success or 148 POLITICAL ECONOMY. failure of the enterprise, tvages ; and the rest of the increment in this case, also, profit. Hence if we take W to denote wages, and use / and P as before, we have /= W+F and for the same reason as before dI=dF It is manifest that in the first of the two cases, the laborer takes all the risk, while the capitalist takes it in the latter case. But in some cases the laborer and capitalist pro- vide for a distribution of the increments, whether positive or negative — gain or loss — in some ratio, as half and half, one and two-thirds, etc., etc. In this case the formula is I=F, + P2 and of course the differential coefficients of Pi and P2 will depend upon the nature of the contract be- tween the parties, and as we shall see, varies by- pretty definite laws in different stages of the civiliza- tion. 7/5. The contract between the parties. But the nature of the contract, whether it will be one in which the laborer works for wages, or hires the capital for rent, will depend, in each case, upon the estimate he puts upon his own capacities. If he RENT AND WAGES. 149 thinks that he can make as profit, more than he can get as wages, he will hire the capital and pay rent for it. If, on the other hand, he is distrustful of himself, and fears that for any. reason his profits will be less than his wages, if he should hire himself out, he will work for such wages as he can get. Hence, as a natural consequence, the more intel- ligent and skillful the laborer, the larger will be the portion seeking to work for themselves on capital of their own, or hired at a low rate of rent, and the more ignorant and unskillful, the larger will be the amount of capital accumulated in the hands of a few. 116. The laiv of S7ipply mid demand. Before proceeding farther with our general subject, however, let us pause to consider two of the most important and fundamental of the laws of Political Economy, namely, the law of (i) supply and de- mand, and (2) the law, or rather the fact, of competi- tion. These are the two great laws that regulate prices. The law of supply and demand supposes people in anxious pursuit of wealth, and each one desirous of increasing his profits as fast as he can [honestly]. If, now, there are two men in a community, doing different kinds of business, and one sees that the I50 POLITICAL ECONOMY. other is making larger profits, and as a consequence, getting rich faster than himself, he will probably- quit the business he has been pursuing, and go into the same kind of business as his neighbor, and thus in general : When there is one kind of business at which men can make money faster than at others, men will quit the kinds in which they are either losing money, or making it less rapidly, and go into that in which they can make it fastest. To this there are certain exceptions, which we shall have occasion to notice below. The law of supply and demand is, therefore, that where there is a demand there will be a supply ; that is, where there is what is called a demand, the demand is in excess of the supply, the price is higher than the average cost of production, which will of course, therefore, induce people to go into an in- crease of production. iiy. The fact of competition. In intimate connection with this, is also the fact of competition ; the excess of supply can bring prices down only by what is called competition. So long as price is above the exchangeable value, the producers can afford to sell for less than they do ; that is, at the usual prices, they make more than the RENT AND WAGES. 151 average rate of profit. In this state of things there are many considerations conspiring to induce them to offer to sell at lower prices. (i) As a general thing, a man wants to sell soon in order to get his money back, to be in readiness to be used again. Under this influence, he will offer to sell a little lower than others, in order to sell be- fore they do. In computing rates of profit, time enters, as well as increment and capital. We call the profit so much per cent., as six per cent. But if a man can make a turn so as to get this six per cent, once in three months, he is manifestly making money faster than if he could make his turns only once in a year. Hence the disposition to sell as soon as may be. (2) When prices are high, there is always a danger of their falling, and most always they do fall, in fact, to a figure nearer the average cost of reproduction. Hence persons having goods to sell, are generally anxious to sell before there shall be a reduction in prices. And some one, that he may sell sooner than others, offers to sell for less. They, as soon as they hear of it, "come down" in their prices also, and are in haste to sell before the reduction shall have gone farther. (3) When prices are high producers are making profit, and of course the more they sell the greater the amount of profit. Hence, in order to sell more 152 POLITICAL ECONOMY. they will sell cheaper, until the price comes down to the average rate of profit. And then they will stop, because if they fall in prices any further, they lose instead of making money. (4) There is yet another motive to competition of a still more general nature. Any person engaged in business is supposed to be desirous of making money as fast as he can. He can increase the amount of his profit in either of two ways, (i) sell- ing at higher prices, or (2) selling more at the same price, if he can do so without a corresponding in- crease in the cost of production. But he can do the former — sell at higher prices— only in certain conditions of the relation of supply and demand, conditions, which, as we have just seen, will, under the law of supply and demand, very soon regulate itself But it is manifest if one can make and sell a larger number of articles without any corresponding in- crease in the cost of production, he will accomplish the same result in regard to the amount of his profits. One hundred articles sold at fifty cents each, will bring as much as fifty articles at a dollar each. And the profit on one hundred articles is twice as much as that on fifty, if there is any profit on the manufacture and sale at all. Hence, in order to increase the amount of sales up to the highest amount that can be produced, without undue in- RENT AND WAGES. 153 crease in the cost of production, each producer becomes a competitor to every other man who is deaHng in the same kind of articles. Thus each one is induced to "undersell" his neighbor, until prices are so low that the rate of profit will not warrant any further reduction or competition. 118. The effect of these lazvs on prices. Hence competition will always bring the price of commodities to the average cost of reproduction. But that is also the point of average rate of profit. It follows that exchangeable value is the point around which price always fluctuates, and to which it is always tending, and that, therefore, the average of price is always equal to exchangeable value. For when price is above, the very fact will set in operation causes that will bring it down ; and in like manner when the price is low, this fact will set at work causes that will bring it up. Like the gov- ernor of a steam-engine, either an excess or a defi- ciency of velocity is made to correct itself and adjust the motion to the proper standard, I ig. May not act instantaneously . But these laws will not act instantaneously : the interference of speculators will often disturb the 154 POLITICAL ECONOMY. operations for awhile, and cause rises and declines in prices, totally irrespective of the laws of compe- tition and the relation of supply and demand. But of course speculators are obliged to act through these laws, and their operations differ from the nat- ural ones, chiefly in the fact that they create the state of facts themselves, on which the laws act ; produce by their operations an appearance of excess of demand, or by withholding commodities from the market, they make a shortness of supply, which there is no natural occasion for. Again, custom has much to do with regulating prices. The price of any commodity, once fixed, does not fluctuate with every variation in the state of the market. Dealers having the articles to sell prefer to take the consequences — the chances — of slight advances and depressions in the price which an article may cost them, rather than be constantly changing from day to day; the average of their profits will be as great, with less of trouble to them and to their customers, than with constant fluctua- tions. This remark holds true, however, of prices at points far remote from commercial centres, rather than in those centres themselves. These variations of price frequently occur, in some articles at least, several times during the same day. RENT AND WAGES. 155 120. The force of habit on prices. This law of competition and supply and demand applies as well to the wages of labor and to the rent of capital, etc., as to any other articles having any price or exchangeable value whatever. But in regard to these, as, in fact, in regard to many other articles, there is often a force of custom or habit that retards the ready conformity of prices to the conditions of the law. If wages, for example, are fixed at one dollar per day, for a certain season of the year and a certain kind of labor, they are likely to remain at that price for some time after the law of supply and demand have been calling for a change. Bye-and-bye, however, the employers begin to think that they are paying too much for their labor, and propose a reduction of wages, and will hire no new hands at the old prices ; or, on the other hand, the laborers, if they are free and intelligent, begin to find that they might as well get more than they are receiving, and rise in their prices, or possibly combine in what is called a "strike." If they are right in their estimate of the fact they will succeed. But whenever a change is proposed by either party, or in either direction, its success is certain if the amount be in accordance with the laws above stated. If labor be scarce in comparison with the demand, wages will rise ; if it 156 POLITICAL ECONOMY. be more abundant than the demand, it will fall; rise in the one case and fall in the other, until the equilibrium is attained. 121. The law of supply and demattd will produce a supply. We may trust the law of supply and demand for these two results. (i) It will provide for a supply, whenever there is a demand, unless the possibility of supply is limited by nature, as in case of the metals, etc. For under this influence the price will rise, either to the intrinsic value of the article in market, or until it is so great that somebody can afford to pro- duce it at the price offered. 122. Will distribute laborers to the various callings. (2) The law will distribute population among the various callings and kinds of labor, as they are needed in such proportions to each, as will best se- cure a supply of whatever is wanted. For, if at any time there are not enough engaged in any particular kind of productive labor, the few who are so engaged will be making more than the average rate of profit, and others will rush into that occupation. And conversely if there be too many RENT AND WAGES. 157 in any occupation, their rate of profit will be below the average, and people will leave it. And thus we have a law that will solve for us practically, if we will let it have its course, some of the greatest problems in social science. We are often obliged to contemplate man, not only as acting in regard to self interest alone, but sometimes even as acting selfishly. Still, even this has its good results. Suppose a large city, and a community of people around it devoted to raising supplies. Each man goes out in the morning to buy what he wants for the day, and cares for no- body else. His purchases affect the state of the market, the supply and demand. Each man living in the neighborhood goes into market either to sell or to learn what is wanted. The traders are pre- pared to buy only what they can sell, and care for nothing else. The countryman thus learns what he can sell, and goes home to produce that article, or rather, the one of those that are wanted that he can produce to the best advantage, and cares for nothing else. But in this way the wants of the consumer are made known ; the supplies are calculated and provided for, as no Commissary or Political Econo- mist on earth could compute and provide for them. 12^. Will regulate wages among the different employments. Let us now proceed to consider the facts that de- 158 POLITICAL ECONOMY. termine the rate of wages and rent, separately, be- fore we make any effort to determine their relation to one another. While both parties are desiring to get as much as they can, there is this difference between them ; the laborer must have some capital or he can do but little work, and can, of course, provide no adequate supply for his most imperious wants ; the capitalist can live for a while on his capital, without rents. But while so doing he is using it up, and has poverty before him, and himself fast and inevitably approach- ing it; the laborer sees this and knows that of course the capitalist dreads poverty more than he does, and fears a diminution of his capital, as a general thing, more than the laborer does the hard- ships that will result from being out of employment. He can always do something. Hence, in any contest, although the capitalist may often get an apparent triumph, it can only be ap- parent ; it must be short-lived, and the laborers will inevitably get the advantage, and control affairs in their own way, in the end. This, however, can be the case only when the laborers are intelligent enough to manage affairs for themselves, and when tiiey have the right of elective franchise, so as to prevent any laws being made, or other interference by way of force, on the part of the capitalists to prevent it. RENT AND WAGES. 159 1 2/1-. Time a factor of ivages. Wages is always expressed by a number, which denotes a product into which time enters as a factor. It is so much per month, per year, etc., and as the time per day, as well as the effective force of labor, varies somewhat with the season of the year, there is an advantage in speaking of it as so much per year ; and then, dividing that amount by the number of working days in a year, or about three hundred, we obtain a uniform average for a day's wages, which, however ideal it may be in some respects, is important as a means of calculation. A laborer may be regarded as a machine — his body — if we regard him as a workman earning wages for himself; and the entire man — soul and body — if we regard him as producing value for another. Considering him now in the former light, his body is a tool, or machine, by Avhich he utilizes the spirit- ual force that is in him, and constitutes his person- ality. In this respect he is analagous to a steam- engine. (i) It cost a certain definite sum to raise him from infancy, up to the time when he could work, just as it cost a certain definite sum to build the steam-engine, and get it ready for work. (2) And, as in the case of the steam-engine, it i6o POLITICAL ECONOMY. costs something for fuel and oil, so with the laboref, it will cost something day by day for food and clothing. (3) And as the engine occasionally needs repairs, so the laborer will have sick days and medicines and nursing. 12^. Time also a factor in I'ent. Now in seeking to ascertain what should be the cost of a machine we take into account these two elements : (i) Its cost; what it cost to build it, and (2) The length of time it will run. And if the laborer undertakes to find the fuel and oil, and to keep it in repair, we divide the cost of the machine by the number of days, or years, as the case may be, during which, with good care, an en- gine will ordinarily last, and the quotient is the rent per day, or year, as the one or the other was used for the unit of the division. If, however, the capitalist furnishes the coal, oil, etc., and makes the repairs, another estimate must be made of the average amount per day, or year, if the cost of these items are added to the amount above ascertained. It is estimated that every twenty years result in the completion of a matured laborer, man or RENT AND WAGES. i6i woman. A portion of the cost of developing such a machine is lost by death during this period, and enhances the value of those who do reach maturity. In estimating the cost of raising children to efficient laborers, men or women, we must include the years lived by those who die before the twentieth year, with the years lived by those who reach that age. Simply as a productive machine, a child is worth at any age the cost of its production. The lowest cost of producing a mere animal laborer, is, on an average, not less than $50 a year. Such a child at ten, is then worth $500, and the mature human machine, $1000. Accordingly, the death of every child or mature laborer results in a great financial loss to the nation. For example : during the seven years ending in 1 87 1, 81,029 persons died under twenty, in the single State of Massachusetts. Their aggregate life periods amounted to 292,762 years, which, at $50 a year, had cost the nation $14,638,100 — an amount to be deducted, as a dead loss, from the capital of the nation. 126. The result reached by another process. Now, it is not asserted that the laborer actually makes any such calculation as to his wages ; and for the most part, he will not, and it is very seldom, if 1 1 i62 POLITICAL ECONOMY. ever, that he does. But the result is the same as if he did. But this is reached by another process, and, for the most part, without any knowledge of the process, or any conscious calculation at all. The law of competition under supply and demand will work the result for him. It will be said it is of no use to make any such computations, since the laborer must take what he can get, he cannot dictate his wages to his employer ; this is, indeed, true of most laborers taken individ- ually. And it is true of all laborers who are in a condition of slavery or serfdom ; deprived alike of all political rights where they are, and of the means and the liberty to go elsewhere. But where no such restrictions exist, there are two important respects in which the competition, or its results obtained by other means, are valuable. I2J. Every laborer wants all he can get. As a general rule, as we have already seen, la- borers in a free government like ours, do, and will, control and determine the amount of wages, not, indeed, each one for himself, but the whole class collectively, as a class, by the law of supply and demand. As between laborers in different kinds of employ- ment, with the consequent difference in wages, this law regulates the actions of laborers individually. RENT AND WAGES. 163 (i) In the first place, a laborer must get enough to supply "running expenses" — so to call it; that is, food, clothing, etc., — from day to day, or he cannot live and work. (2) He must get enough to supply four persons, or about that number, or he cannot replace himself and supply a constant population. This arises from the fact that in a family there must be a mother, there will be children, and the laborer himself will sometimes be sick, and will at length get to be old. And unless he can, when in the prime of life and in health, get, as wages, enough to meet these de- mands, the supply will not be kept good, and under the law of supply and demand the wages will rise until it becomes enough to meet these wants. But above this, every laborer wants all he can get He wants leisure and means of improvement. He wants means of educating his children. He wants to have something to serve as capital, and help them to start with. He wants something to leave them as a maintenance when he dies. Hence, as I said before, he will demand all he can get. How much that is, we will see bye-and-bye. 128. The higher wages of skilled labor. In all cases, when the labor requires any particu- lar amount of skill, the wages are generally higher, 1 64 POLITICAL ECONOMY. than when no such skill is required for the work he has to do. This phenomena falls under two heads, (i) The law of average cost of reproduction, and (2) limita- tion of supply. The man that needs to spend time and money in acquiring an education, or, having a trade, has ex- pended more on himself than one who has made no such acquisition. And it will take a correspondingly large amount of outlay to educate and fit for work another like him. Hence, as an engine that has cost five thousand dollars, should, and will, rent for more than one that has cost and can be reproduced for three thousand dollars, so the educated machine, physician, lawyer, etc., should and will get more than the man who can do only simple unskilled labor. If they were to go into a computation like what I have indicated above, they would divide what it has cost them to get their education, by the average number of years during which such men live, and are able to labor, and add that amount to the or- dinary wages of simple labor. And the law of supply and demand will bring them to precisely that result. If, for example, a man as a mason cannot get more wages than a com- mon laborer, none will take the trouble to learn the trade, and hence, from a diminution of the supply RENT AND WAGES. 165 of laborers, there will be a rise in the wages, until it reaches the point where men can afford to learn the trade. i2g. Exceptions to the law. To this law there are two exceptions. (a) When any particular calling is disagreeable, or in disrepute among men, the amount demanded and which must be paid as wages, will be somewhat above what it would be by the above rule, to over- come the reluctance to perform it arising from this cause. (b) When the occupation is particularly pleasant and honorable, many will undertake it for the pleas- ure and honor, and thus will serve for less than the mere commercial value of their services. Of this kind are the services of professional men, the de- votees to art and science generally. I JO. Effect of constancy of occupation. The above statements apply to cases in which wages are computed by the year. When, however, we have occasion to compute by a shorter period, as by the day, hour, etc., there is often another element, that comes in to modify the result, which is sometimes called the constancy or steadiness of the occupation. 1 66 POLITICAL ECONOMY. Thus masons can seldom get work all through the winter, their wages will, therefore, be higher in pro- portion during the summer, and the weather when they can work. Physicians, and men of that kind,, are liable to very great irregularity and inconstancy in the occupation of their time. They charge more per hour than if their occupation was constant. Or again, when any kind of business is positively unhealthy, men will charge for their time, a sum in proportion to the time they are likely to lose by sickness. /J/. Second law determining the rate of wages. The second law arises from the limitation of sup- ply for the demand. This law applies to men of extraordinary gifts only, the great men in any de- partment, are few and never in excess of the demand. Hence they can demand for their services what they please, and they usually get it. In an ordinary lawsuit, for example, a lawyer of ordinary capacities will answer all purposes. And he cannot charge exorbitant fees, for there are so many that can do the work as well as he that their competition will deprive him of work altogether, unless he will work as cheaply as they. But in one of those cases where large amounts are at stake, and the cause one that requires the greatest skill, the RENT AND WAGES. 167 men who have that skill are so few that they can demand almost anything they please, and the prices such persons can command have no constant ratio to the expenses of educating them. The only limit to price in such cases is intrinsic value ; it cannot rise above that IJ2. Average cost of reproduction will fwt explain them. Writers on Political Economy have usually at- tempted to account for the exceptionally large fees or salaries that such persons get, on the same prin- ciple — the average cost of reproduction — as they apply to ordinary cases. But I think they fail, for two reasons : (i) It often happens that such extraordinary per- sons have expended no very great amount on their education ; they rise to their eminence by virtue of some natural gift, and with no more than the ordi- nary means of education and no more than the ordinary amount of labor and study in preparation. (2) But generally no amount of labor, tuition, or expenditure of any kind can make such men "to order." A state may be in never so great need of great statesmen or a great general, and it may have all the appliances and means for educating and "making" them. But they will not come at its call. i6g POLITICAL ECONOMY. It may be in "perishing" need, but its calamities and its clamors alike pass unheeded, unless there be some one God-made man adequate to the emer- gency, and then he is invaluable, worth more than all other men without him. /jj. In what sense wages equal in all departments. Leaving now this last class out of the account, and taking note only of the great mass of laborers, the common run of men, such as exist or can be produced by education to any extent that may be wanted, and we have the law that "Taking the cost of education into account, the wages of labor in all departments will be equal." If there is no outside influence, no misgovern- ment, no unjust legislation, the thing will take care of itself and come to this result ; the law of supply and demand is good for that. / ?^. This just as well as necessary. I have been aiming in this discussion to point out and discuss the laws that regulate the different rates of wages that are paid to men in the different call- ings and occupations of life, rather than to show the justice of what they will get, to show what will be, rather than what ought to be. It may be RENT AND WAGES. 169 worth while, however, to pause for a moment to show that what will thus occur, is just and right on the fundamental principles of justice. It is not an uncommon notion among the laborers of the lower order, that they do all the work and get but a small share of the wealth. But work to be effective, requires brains as well as muscle, good calculation as well as diligent toil. And we often see that a company of ten men, for example, with one man to plan and guide them in their work, will accomplish a good deal more than one-tenth more than they would with no such guidance. They are more likely to accomplish twice as much with him as they could without, thus showing that he is really the most effective laborer of them all, perhaps, more effective than them all. 'jj. Different rates of rent. The same laws, in general, will regulate the rent that will be paid for capital, as compared with the wages of labor, and for one kind of capital when compared with another. There may be objects that, like Niagara Falls, are unique and cannot be reproduced, which will fix their own price, irrespective of the cost of repro- duction, since reproduction in such cases is impossi- ble, and the only limit to the price they command is, I70 POLITICAL ECONOMY. as before, intrinsic value ; the price of a thing can never rise above that. But with this exception, all articles of property will rent for the average cost of their reproduction, divided by the time during which it will last, subject as before, to the two conditions of desirableness or undesirableness. A man will often give more for a house that is pleasantly situated, or a machine that is beautiful to the eye, than for one that is just as good, but does not please him as well. As in the case of laborers, if the kind of business be one dangerous to life and health, the laborer will get more wages ; so with property of any kind, if it be particularly liable to injury or loss, the amount of rent will be higher. /j(5. Relation of rent to interest. It is customary in fixing rent, to have regard to interest paid on money. And, in fact, the two, in- terest and rent, obey the same laws. Money bor- rowed, can easily be used to buy machinery with. Hence, under the law of competition, if the one were at any time higher than the other, the demand would change, and bring them to an equilibrium. Rent on capital, however, is always a little below interest, for in the case of money, there is always expected a return of the same amount of value. And the con- RENT AND WAGES. 171 tract is made on this expectation. But in the case of other articles of property, such as houses, oxen, machinery, etc., it is always expected that it will be worn by the use, and thus returned in a state of somewhat diminished value. It is better, therefore, in order to get at the law determining the rate of rent, to get first at the law determining the rate of interest. And here we must take note of the fact that in most cases of borrowing and trading between man and man, there is some uncertainty about getting back what had been lent. And hence an extra sum is charged as insurance against the risk of loss. Still, however, the average rates at which money can be hired on first class securities, is near enough to absolute inter- est for all our present purposes ; and we have the law. ijy. Rate of interest decreases with increase of capital. Let us suppose a laborer with no implements, but (to simplify the .case) with plenty of land, free of rent, to cultivate. His neighbor, a capitalist, has hoes ; the gardener finds that with a hoe he can raise twice as much as without, other things being the same. He can afford to give one-half what he could raise with the hoe, for the use of it, which would be one 172 POLITICAL ECONOMY. hundred per cent. ; that is, he would give for the hoe, as much as he could produce without it. Now, without going through all these stages, the time will come when capital is abundant, and when every laborer in consequence will have enough of his own, so that he will not want any more ; that is, he will have all the tools and machinery that he can use in his business with any advantage — with any incre- ment to the efficiency of labor, and therefore he will give nothing for any increase ; capital will com- mand no rent, money no interest, from him. Doubtless there will be stages in the progress of improvement, times when great discoveries are made, when a new machine or something of the kind will cause an exception to the general rule. The average tendency of interest and rent, when reckoned, as is usual, in the per cent, of capital, is downward ; for the reason that at each successive stage the added implement or improvement will give only a less increment to the efficiency of labor, until we arrive at the period when there is no other implement that can be bought that will give any increase to the efficiency of human labor. We have, then, the following as two general laws : (i) With every stage in the advance of civilization we find that human labor becomes more valuable ; that is, a given amount of it, with the use of machinery, (which is always increasing,) will pro- RENT AND WAGES. 173 duce a larger amount of intrinsic value. Or if, as in a preceding section, we take labor as the standard, then we have the law, as there given, that with advancing civilization the price of all commodities tends to become less. (2) Under the same conditions, the rent on capi- tal becomes less with each advancing stage of civilization, until we reach the limit, when it is nothing. 1^8. Depends rather on value than amount. In considering the rent on capital with reference to this law, we must always take the value, rather than the amount, as the basis of our calculation. The rent of a farm, for example, may be but a few hundred dollars, in a new country where people are but few and land cheap. But let the population in- crease in density, and the land, though the same in quantity, becomes more valuable, and it may rent for as many hundreds of dollars as it did for tens before. And yet, doubtless, the rent will be only a smaller per cent, of the estimated value of the land. This results, also, from the law already established, namely : that rent or interest is a less per cent, of the cost of all commodities as civilization advances, and wealth increases ; notwithstanding, the capita^l thus used increases the efficiency of the labor, so 174 POLITICAL ECONOMY. that more is produced with it than could have been produced without. The laborer gets the share due to labor. And while human labor is but a decreas- ing element in the production of each particular article — so that the articles come to be cheaper, and cheaper — the labor produces an ever increasing number of these articles, so that what the laborer gets, is a much larger number of articles with equal, perhaps greater intrinsic value, at a much less and constantly decreasing cost. He gets more and more of the necessaries of life, and whatever he may hap- pen to want to use with a day's labor, with every step in the advance of civilization. Hence, with regard to the capital itself, being but the distributive wealth, so long as it is increasing faster than the population, after a certain stage in the progress, it becomes a supply, increasing faster than the demand. Hence the price — rent or interest — must fall, whatever may be the average cost of re- production. i^g. Important law of distribution. From these considerations, we have the important law, namely: That while the total increment is constantly in- creasing with increasing density of population, and the accumulation of capital, giving an increase of RENT AND WAGES. 175 both aggregate and distributive wealth, and a greater amount of increase to both the capitaHst and laborer, the proportion of the increment which goes to the capitalist, is a decreasing one, and that which goes to the laborers, is an increasing one. Or, to put the same thing in another form, rent grows less and less in proportion to the value of the capital rented, and labor is constantly commanding a higher price, and the laborers are getting more and more wages. And this process, of course, tends to elevate the laborer, and to equalize the distribution of wealth between him and the capitalist. This change will show itself in the increased ease and frequency with which persons, starting in life with nothing but their hands and their brains, will rise to the possession of wealth. It will show itself also, soon, and about as soon, in the improved con- dition of the mass of laborers themselves. 1^0, Capitalists cannot defeat this law. It is a very comman notion, that if capitalists choose to keep their capital in their own hands, they can make their own terms, and demand what rent they please. It is a very common opinion with Political Economists, as well as with others, that capital is more than either brains or muscle, and 176 POLITICAL ECONOMY. rules the world. But we answer that they cannot keep their capital in their own hands. When, as in this country, there is no privileged class, such a thing is impossible. I have already shown how in that case they would consume it and come to pov- erty, and in ceasing to be capitalists, they must become laborers, and be obliged to go to work. It is a political and a physical impossibility for any number of capitalists to hold the land in unpro- ductive idleness. It must be cultivated in order to produce crops ; the laborers, therefore, will have it to cultivate. And if they cannot hire tools at prices below their intrinsic value, that is, for the same as, or less than, the difference between what they can do with and what they can do without, they will do without them, and do something too : begin where our savage ancestors began ; use a sharp stick for a hoe, a flat stone for a spade, and a pine knot for a plough. And next year they will have better tools from their own manufacture and no thanks to the capitalists. No class combination or civil power on earth can prevent this. This, however, is an ex- treme case. As a general rule, the law of supply and demand and of competition will regulate this, and bring rent and wages to an equilibrium. Neither class will commit suicide, least of all the capitalists. RENT AND WAGES. 177 1/f.i. Equality between rent and wages. Suppose, for example, rent is too high, that is, so high that a laborer of average capacity will have less remaining as profit at the end of the year, after having paid his rent, than he could have had if he had worked for wages ; we shall have a large sup- ply of laborers for wages, and a small demand for capital to rent. Rent will, of course, come down in obedience to the law of supply and demand. Or suppose, on the contrary, that rent is so low that the profits to the laborer, after paying it, will be more than wages ; capital will be in demand, and rents will go up. And thus the thing will regulate itself and that law of justice between man and man will be found by this means, which no man, by abstract reasoning, has been able to discover. ijf.2. The same result reached in another way. We may reach a similar result in another way. Suppose it takes two days to make a spade, and a spade will last only one day ; the capitalist puts in two days to the gardener's one, and is entitled to, and will ordinarily get, two-thirds of the products of the day's labor. If the spade will last a season of one hundred days, the capitalist puts in but two 12 178 POLITICAL ECONOMY. per cent., and so in proportion will retain his share of the increment as rent, accordingly. Now all capital is in this way the product of labor. And the capitalist is supposed to have produced it by his own labor. It is in this way that he does his part in the work of creating wealth and produc- ing a supply for the wants of mankind. And although we cannot always compute the amount of labor that any article of capital has cost,, yet the law of supply and demand^ wiser in this, as in most things else, than our most profound calculations,, will bring us to the just result in all cases. If a man can make more money by making tools than by using them, he will go to making them in- stead of using them. This is of course the general rule. 14.^, Causes that retard the operation of the law. But some there are, who, having learned one kind of trade, or for other reasons, being attached to one particular mode of life, will continue in it after his income in it has fallen below the average rate of profit, to which all forms of industry, all kinds of trades, and, as we have now seen, even the compe- tition between capital and labor itself,' always tends. If any kind of labor has become, in the common expression, a "bad business/' "does not pay/' the RENT AND WAGES. 179 old may continue it, but no young men seek it as a calling and the middle-aged, who can do so, will seek some other means of providing for their wants. Not choice or taste, only, determines man's actions in this life. Often there is a necessity for him, to which, although here and there an individual may resist it, the mass must at length submit, whether they choose to do so, or not. And if, in any cases, persons complain of high rent, or low wages — complain that rent is above the value of the property, or wages below the value of their services — they must remember that they com- pare property by one standard, when they complain, and by another, when they make the bargain. If they give more than the average cost of reproduc- tion for rent, it is because the article rented has, in their estimation, another value, besides its mere com- mercial one. And, if they work for less than their labor is worth in money, it is because they get some- thing else than money, as fame, gratification of taste, the consciousness of benefit to others, as the consideration on account of which they work. i^/f^ Predominance of labor. We have seen that human labor, however aided by the forces of nature, is the only thing that enters into our estimate of value, and that with each succes- i8o POLITICAL ECONOMY. sive stage of an advancing civilization the proportion which this bears to the forces of nature becomes less ; therefore the value of each of the articles that constitute wealth decreases. For the same reason, as well as for the one given, rent and interest will decrease also. And the only- exception in the case of rent is that in which the exchangeable value itself, as in the case of land, is rising by labor bestowed upon or around the rented property. Hence in this world labor is king. He that will do the work must and will enjoy the proceeds of his labor. Such is the law, and all nations are tending — slowly, perhaps, but surely and irresistibly — ■ towards its realization. The abolition of hereditary distinctions and privileged classes, with inherited political powers, has cleared the field of all obstacles to its fair play and full operation in our own coun- try, and the most advanced nations of the old world are drifting into the same current, and must finally come to the same result. CHAPTER VII. OF EXCHANGE. No exchange without division of labor — Exchange between those who use tools — Tools the result of past labor — How determine Jheir value — Tools reappear in other ai-ticles — The basis of ex- change — Elements of labor represented in any article — Basis of estimate between the buyer and seller — The gain by the ex- change — The money-price of but little account — In what respects important — The benefits of exchange — The cost of ex- change — Who bears the cost ? — Cost varies with bulk and weight — Commercial centres determining prices — How deter- mined at the centres — Effect of the rising of new centres — Of centres of production — Cost distributed between the pro- ducer and the consumer — The only way of escaping this result — What is sold determines the price of all that is produced — It determines also the price of all other articles — A common mis- take with regard to the benefits of trade — Thrift determines the amount of exchanges — Benefits of proximate exchanges — Articles should be manufactured at a place of production — Difference in facility for manufacture and production — The great wealth of commercial centres — Inferences in favor of free labor and free trade — Governments not satisfied with this — I. Monopolies, copy and patent rights — II. Usury laws — Argu- ments in their favor— III. Tariff, for revenue — Objections to it — Effect of taa-iff on importations — What makes a tariff protect- 1 82 POLITICAL ECONOMY. ive — Effect of a tariff that is below protection — Limits witliini which protection is possible — List's doctrine — Protection and national independence — Diversiftcation of industry — Free trade- reduces the wages of the laborers — The evil effects of low wages on the laborers — Beneficial effects of the higher manu- fectures — Free trade only with free laborers — Difference between- British doctrine and British practice — John Stuart Mill advocates protection — Classes of persons that are not likely to favor pro- tection — Political motives that may oppose it — Probability of the continuance of protection in America. Division of labor in the utilization of the forces of nature in the production of wealth, depends upon the possibility and the prospect of exchange. i/f.^. No excha7^ge without division of labor. Exchange is the giving of one article having ex- changeable value, for another having the same kind of value. Sometimes these articles are changed im- mediately by the producers of the respective articles themselves, and in that case it is called "barter." But as this is inconvenient, all civilized nations, and most savage nations, in fact, have found some means of exchange called money, for which the producers sell, and with which consumers buy whatever they choose to make the subject of exchange at all. But unless persons could make exchanges, each one would be obliged to give his attention to the production of that which he would need for his own EXCHANGE. 183 consumption, and no accumulation worth speaking of would be possible. Exchange must, therefore, begin to take place in some form, at the very inception of civilization. It takes place between the members of the same fam- ily. When, for example, it is arranged that the wife shall have charge of, and do the work in the house, and the husband, in like manner, see to, and do the out-door work, there is an exchange of labor ; or, what is the same thing, the products of labor, be- tween them. And thus exchange is the basis of di- vision of labor, and begins even in the domestic circle. 1^6. Exchange betivecn those who make, and those who use tools. But as soon as fixed habitations are commenced among men, diversity of employment comes in, of necessity. Some will make tools, others will nsc them. Soon we have the makers of tools divided into trades, as shoemakers, tailors, blacksmiths, car- penters, masons, etc, ; and those who use the tools, will also accustom themselves to different employ- ments ; and a large -share use tools that have been made by others, while making tools for others to use. Take a .single example for an illustration : the I §4 POLITICAL ECONOMY. carpenter uses, we will say, a hammer. He makes with it a house, which is a tool, to live in, a barn^ which is a tool to house crops in, and the stock of the farm, etc. But then, the farmer produces wheat, etc., which is but a tool to produce human bone and muscle,, and the bone and muscle are but tools tO' produce other commodities, the products of labor. And thus, in a most general view,, everything, ex- cept the soul of man — the intelligent moral agent in the body — is but a tool by which that soul con- trols and uses all else below, for its own purposes. 7^7. Tools the result of past labor. But let us consider the hammer a little farther. And first, in a backward glance, we see that the tool is the product of labor ; a laborer of one kind made the handle, and a laborer of another made the head. But those who made the handle used tools partly of wood and partly of iron and steel. Hence then we are on the track that leads back to the lum- berman and miner. But the lumberman and miner used tools — tools consisting of parts of wood and iron, — ^which lead our thought farther back to other lumbermen and miners before .them, and so on to the first man that ever performed a single stroke of labor on this earth. A small fraction of that labor — infinitesimally small, indeed — appears in every EXCHANGE. 185 article we use or enjoy to-day, and will do so to the end of time. And in buying the hammer, for example, the carpenter pays perhaps a dollar. But that dollar goes to pay for the work done by each and all this endless line of co-laborers in its production ; and some part of it is the compensation for each man's share, from Adam the first man, to Smith the hard- ware merchant, of whom the carpenter bought it for the aforesaid price. 1^8. How determine their value. But how came it that the carpenter paid just a dollar, that and no more, for the hammer ? Did he or the hardware man go into any calculation of (i) the amount of human labor required, on the average, to produce the sixteenth of an ounce of gold (if that be the exact amount in a dollar ?) and (2) the exact amount of labor performed by each one of this endless line of co-operators from Adam down, determining and assigning to each the precise amount of his labor which reappears in this particu- lar article of mechanism? Of course not: the thing would be impossible. But the law of supply and demand has done it for them, and made ready the price the moment the parties are ready to make the exchange. 1 86 POLITICAL ECONOMY. j^g. Tools reappear in other articles. Now let us take a forward glance. The carpenter uses the hammer. With every blow it wears out and approaches the day of its final consumption and return to the condition in which the intrinsic value it had received from all this labor is gone ; and it remains a mere piece of iron con- signed to rust, and the handle is used, perhaps, to kindle a fire with. Some part of the hammer, therefore, may be considered as going into every article the carpenter makes and uses the hammer in making ; and he charges for every article and every day's work a little more for the use and wear of his hammer. And the purchaser of his wares pays back to him what he paid for the hammer — the wages of all the Hne of laborers whose work went into that hammer — and a little more, to pay for that share of his labor which also went into the articles, each one according to its proportion. And the hammer goes into every article he makes in using it, in infinitesimally small quantities indeed, but it goes into them, and they as tools go into other articles in like manner, increasing in number in a geometrical ratio, carrying with them a con- stantly diminished and diminishing portion of the hammer, until it becomes distributed int® portions inconceivably small and incalculable in number, ever EXCHANGE. 187 increasing in number and subdividing in amount, to the end of time, and the consummation of all things. Not a second's work, not an action of muscles in productive labor, is ever lost, or can be lost, any more than a particle of matter can be either created or destroyed by the urgency of human needs or the dexterity of human manipulations. /50. The basis of exchange. Now, primarily, the labor that has gone into any article, is the basis or condition of its exchange. It created the exchangeable value, and determines its amount. Or, to be more exact, the average amount of labor needed to reproduce the article, is the average of the price at which it will be sold. Mill, (B. I, Ch. II, § I,) after tracing this subdivision of labor, and remarking that the ultimate parts are exceedingly, incalculably small, adds, "such quantities are not worth taking into account for any practical purpose." But we may not treat them as nothing. They make up the exchangeable value, small as they are, and we might as well deny that the sun is the source of light and heat, because we can not com- pute the light of a single beam, or the heat of a single ray which it is constantly emitting, and by which the earth is made habitable — the glad abode of man. i88 POLITICAL ECONOMY. Hence on his theory "value," which is but another name for "price," is but the measure of the diffi- culty of obtaining anything arising from the limita- tion of its quantity. This may be true enough in a certain sense, but it is non causa pro causa, not the truth which the case requires, even if it be a truth at all. Why is the quantity limited ? possibly and undoubtedly by nature in some cases ; but for the most part because no more labor has been expended in producing it. And what constitutes the difficulty of getting it? It can be only the work that has been performed, or rather that which is needed to reproduce it. 757. Elements of labor represented in every article. It will be the most economical, and (if we exercise proper care) it will lead to no practical evils, to speak of the labor with which an article has been produced as the only item that is at all worth con- sideration. This labor may, without going too minutely into detail, be referred to three heads : (i) The labor of the agriculturist and the miner in producing the raw material. (2) The labor which each of the manufacturers and traders in various ways bestows on the article while in his hands. (3) The distributive share of labor expended in EXCHANGE. 189 producing the tools and machinery, which were used in the work done on the commodity, and the food, clothing, etc., consumed by the laborers while producing it. 1^2. Bases of estimates betzveen the buyer and the seller. Each party to a contract estimates the commodi- ties indeed by the labor they have cost. But then each party has a different standard by which to estimate this cost. Each party estimates what he has to sell by what it has cost him in skilled labor, and what he has to buy at what it would cost him in unskilled labor to produce it. /5J. The gain by the exchange. Thus, suppose it takes, on the whole, four days to make a hat and four to make a pair of shoes ; that is, it takes the expert artizan that amount of time to produce them. But it will take the inexpert man more time, and the article will be inferior at that. Now suppose it takes the hatter four days to make the hat and eight days to make the shoes — in all twelve days to make for himself a hat and a pair of shoes. In like manner it would take the shoe- maker four days to make for himself a pair of shoes. I90 POLITICAL ECONOMY. and eight days to make his hat ; and thus it would require twenty-four days' work to supply both parties with hats and shoes without exchange, whereas with exchange it will cost but eight days each, or sixteen in all. And supposing the artizans keep at work all the time, there is a gain to the wealth of the community of the product of eight days' labor, or a hat and a pair of shoes for the laborers in some other form of industry, in conse- quence of this division of labor and the exchange which is thereby rendered possible. In the case supposed, the hatter and the shoe- maker will exchange even. But suppose one of them, the hatter, invents a means or process, by which he can produce a hat in two days, with no larger outlay for stock or tools, etc. He could now afTord to give two hats for a pair of shoes ; but it is not likely that he would reduce his price quite so much as that. He will rather increase his profits, by asking a little more than half the former price. Now, suppose the shoemaker, should find means or processes for making shoes, whereby he could make a pair in two days, and the hats and shoes would exchange one for another, as before. And so on, as long as the human labor of production is the same, the exchangeable value will be the same. EXCHANGE. 191 75^. The money-price of but little account. So far as anything we have before us now is con- cerned, it is manifestly of no consequence ivhat ive call the price of a hat or of the shoes, whether a shilHng, a dollar, a pound, or a thousand dollars, whether an ounce or a half ton of gold, coined or uncoined. Gold and silver are no standard of value : labor is the only standard, the only thing we pay for, the only thing that we buy or sell in our business transactions. As this is an important fact, let us, in order to make it plainer, make another supposition. Sup- pose the shoemaker asks a thousand dollars for his shoes ; the hatter, not having the money, goes to the bank and borrows it, pays it to the shoemaker, and the shoemaker on the next day goes to the hatter, and pays the same amount, the same identi- cal bills, perhaps, to the hatter for the hat, and the hatter takes the money back to the bank, and pays the debt he contracted when he borrowed it, and ail things return to statu qtio. 755. In zvhat respects it is important. I want the limitation above indicated, however, to be carefully noted ; for it does make a difference what is the price of commodities, in two very im- portaHt particulars. 192 POLITICAL ECONOMY. (i) The money used in making the exchange is never without cost. It costs something for the use of it, and interest is always in proportion to the amount, as six, or some other per cent. (2) If coin is used, there is always some loss by wear, etc., which is also always in proportion to the amount used. It has been computed that the wear and loss of gold and silver would be about one per cent, per year of the entire amount used, if all our exchanges were made in coin, instead of using paper. Each of these items will come up for special con- sideration under a subsequent head. But they are so small, that for present purposes, we may as well leave them out of the account. It will simplify our discussions very much to do so, and will make no difference with the results. We then assume, for the present, that the price of articles, that is, the money notation of their value, is of no importance to the fundamental laws of ex- ' change. 156. The benefits of exchange. The benefits of exchange then, are referable to two heads. (i) When there is a difference in soil, climate, mineral resources, etc., etc., or, (2) a saving of labor EXCHANGE. 193 when compared with the production at the place of consumption. Thus, it is cheaper to bring coffee from Brazil, Porto Rico, etc., than to build hot- houses and raise it here. We have considered this already. (2) But in the same locality^ where the transpor- tation is nothing, or only a minimum, we gain by it all the difference between the productiveness of skilled and unskilled labor, involving, as this does, the advantages of the division of labor, the utiliza- tion of the forces of nature, etc., already considered. 757, The cost of exchange. But exchange, at any rate and in any form, in- volves some cost by the very act of making it. This we may resolve into two elements. (i) The mere labor and expense of the trader, which consists again of two elements ; (a) his capital, as store, etc., which will inevitably obey the laws of rent already laid down, and (b) his labor, which under the laws already laid down, will also reduce to the average rate of wages for all kinds of labor. (2) The cost of transportation which will arise in all cases where there is a distance between the pro- ducer and consumer. This might be reduced to the two elements above 13 194: POLITICAL ECONOMY. named, namely : cost of means of transportation, as teams, railroads, ships, etc., and the labor needed in using them. But that is not necessary for our pres- est purpose,. I wish rather to find out where this cost of transportation must fall 1^8. Who bears the cost ? If we ask the consumers, who live mostly in villages and cities, they will answer, that of course the consumer pays the cost of transportation, and will refer you to the indisputable facts, that meat, and flour, and vegetables, are cheaper in the country than in the town, in the small town than in the large city ; that coal,, and fuel of all kinds,, are cheaper at the mines than when delivered at their doors. Hence they infer that the consumer pays all the cost of transportation. But many Political Economists hold, nevertheless,, that it is the producer who pays the cost of trans- portation : this is especially true of Carey, and the American writers who follow him. And they refer to the equally indisputable fact, that any commodity,, as flour, for example, has a fixed price or value in the city,, and that at varying distances from the city the price is less, just in proportion to the cost of transportation. Thus, note the price of flour at New York,, at Albany, at Buffalo, at Chicago, etc.„ EXCHANGE. 195 and you will find the difference in price between New York and Albany, between New York and Buffalo, as much more as the cost of transportation from Buffalo to Albany ; and so on, to the re- motest point from which any flour is brought to New York. But in fact neither of these parties are altogether and wholly in the right. In order to get at the exact truth, we must con- sider a few preliminary matters. i^g. Cost varies with bidk and weight. The cost of the transportation of articles varies with (i) their bulk or (2) their weight — very seldom with their value. Hence for any article there is a Hmit beyond which it will not bear transportation ; that is, the cost of transportation will equal the difference between the exchangeable value where it is pro- duced and the intrinsic value where it is sold. But for convenience let us speak of exchangeable value alone, as it will save words and danger of confusion to do so, and because, moreover, the exchangeable value will or'dinarily be the limit determining the price at the place of sale, as well as at the place of purchase. It will also be the element that will be taken into account in deciding upon the transporta- tion to any distant market. 196 POLITICAL ECONOMY. N.ow the distance to which anything can be car- ried will always be a product of the value into the reciprocal of the weight or bulk, as tlie case may be. Thus if one hundred dollars worth of ha}^ weigh five tons, it can be carried a certain distance without exceeding the limits spoken of But if it should weigh ten tons,, it could be carried only half as far, and if two and a half tons, twice as far. J 60. Commercial centres determining prices. Hence for all commodities there are commercial centres. And tliese centres may be either (i) cen- tres of consumption or (2) centres of trade. Suppose in a certain island there is a city to which all the wheat raised in the island, besides what is used by the producers themselves — scattered as they are on their several farms — is carried and used up in feeding the people ; this city would be, for that island and that article, the commercial centre of consumption. Or again, suppose no wheat were used in the city at all, and yet all that the inhabitants have to spare were taken there and sold to merchants to be shipped to some foreign country, or resold to be consumed by other persons in the same island ; that city would be none the less the commercial centre for that com- modity, than if the wheat were all ground up and eaten in the city itself. EXCHANGE. 197 I have spoken of an isolated island in order to simplify the illustration. And this earth itself is such an isolated place for all articles that will bear universal transportation. Such articles can have but one commercial centre. But as I have said, many articles will not bear so much transportation ; the cost of transportation would be more than the market price when they arrive in market Hence heavy and bulky articles must have a commercial centre near home, and by consequence, each one of them must have more than one such centre. And we must remember that by far the largest share of the articles that make uj) the annual product of labor on this earth, are of this kind. Suppose, then, an article in any existing state of the facilities for transportation, will bear transporta- tion only twenty miles. It must either have a com- mon centre within that distance, or it will not be produced for sale at all, the producer raising only what he wants for his own use. And that centre will be a place where all the producers of that ar- ticle, living within the circuit of the territorial dis- tances just named, will compete in underbidding each other ; and this competition will determine the price for that centre. And, consequently all such articles, by the necessity of having many centres, may have as many prices in the different centres. 198 POLITICAL ECONOMY. Now, it seems to me, that for all the purposes of our computations in Political Economy, we must re- gard, as the price of every article, that which it bears in the commercial centre of the world, if it be an ar- ticle that will bear transportation from any part of the world where it can be produced^ to that centre. But in case of articles that will not bear this- transportation, there must be more than one centre^ and, of course, more than one price; and these prices may be widely different in the different centres. And this difference in price, will be a very different thing from the different prices which an ar- ticle, that will bear universal transportation, like gold, for example, will have at different times, in precisely the same places> and is determined by a different law. 161. Ho%v deter-inined at the centres. Let us now try and determine, if we can, what will be the price of the commodity in each of the two classes of cases. Suppose, first, gold, silver, etc., including all the articles that will bear transportation to any part of the earth where they may be wanted. We have already seen what are the laws and conditions that will determine the price. It can never exceed the intrinsic value. Its average cannot exceed the ex- EXCHANGE. 199 ■changeable value, which will be, as we have seen, the average cost of reproduction. But competition, not only among the producers of those articles, but also competition among the producers of all the articles having exchangeable value, or a market price at all, as we have seen, will keep the average price down to the exchangeable value, so that the producers of that article will make by their labors the average rate of wages among mankind. But suppose, in the next place, we have an article that will not bear universal transportation. Any place where it is wanted, either for consumption or sale, will be for it a centre. At first the price will be determined by the amount of the demand, and the competition among those in the immediate neighborhood, who will take the commodity there for sale. If the price be too low, that is, below the exchangeable value de- termined as before described, the suppl)/ will de- crease and the price will rise. But if the place be a growing one, or if for any reason the demand increases, or the original supply was insufficient, either the original producers will increase their productions by increasing the labor and capital invested, (withdrawing them from others), or producers from a greater distance will bring their commodities to the new market, and the price will then be determined by competition among 200 POLITICAL ECONOMY. the producers. All the producers will bring their commodities to that market, acting under the law of supply and demand, just as if it were the only commercial centre,, for that commodity, that is to be found anywhere in the world. 162. Effect of the rising of neiu centres. If now a new centre should spring up within an old circuit or near ity or if a railroad or other means of cheapening transportation should be made be- tween any two old centres for the same article, we should have competition between the. two, with a corresponding effect on prices. The price is fixed then, as we have seen, by competition and the law of supply and demand. It makes no difference to the city purchaser where the article was produced ; its quality is the only thing that he cares for. The man that brings it in from a distance of twenty miles will get no more for his commodity than the man who has brought it but one. And at twenty miles distant the price is always less than at the commercial centre, by precisely the cost of transportation to that centre. Hence prices varying with the distance of pro- ducers from the city had better be regarded as the true and real prices, and the cost of transportation to that centre will be regarded as falling upon the EXCHANGE. 201 producer, although the consumer pays more for the article for being at a distance from the place of production. i6j. Limitation to the law. To this law there can be only one limit. In cases of a limitation of the production of the supply to one place, that one place becomes for that article the commercial centre, and we may have either : (i) A monopoly, in which case the owner can ask anything he pleases as the price of the article up to its intrinsic value, (he cannot sell at prices above that), and determine the price for the whole world. (2) Or in case there be no monopoly, the price is determined by the average cost of reproduction at that place; thus, if diamonds were found only in India, their price would be the average labor cost of finding them there, and the price would be deter- mined at the place of production, rather than at that of consumption, or at any commercial centre. Two things are manifest with the exceptions just stated. (i) The consumption among the producers would determine the price of the commodities in the com- mercial centres. 202 POLITICAL ECONOMY. (2) The article would command a higher price at the centre than at any other place within the circuit of production limited by the distance for which it would bear transportation. 1 6 /J.. Cost distributed between the producer and the consumer. Accepting, now, the price of the article in the market as the real price, we have the result, namely : the producers pay the cost of transportation to the commercial centre. And for the consumer, he pays the cost of trans- portation from the commercial centre to the place of consumption. The man who produces lead in Missouri, sells it at the current price in New York less the cost of transportation. The man in New Jersey who buys the lead to work up, buys it in New York at the market price there, also, and pays for carrying it to his place of manufacture, and the cost will of course vary with the distance and facili- ties of transportation. 165. The only way of escaping this result. And the only way in which this can be escaped, is the manufacturer's meeting it on the way, and having it carried from the producer in Missouri, for EXCHANGE. 203 example, directly to his shop in New Jersey, with- out going into New York, and out of it again, back to the place of consumption. 166. What is sold determines the price of all that is produced. If now a producer lives at some distance from market, the cost of transportation may be quite an amount, and if there are others for whom it is less, who can furnish enough to supply the demand in that market, he will have to cease producing that commoditx' since its production will not pay for his labor. And it is worth noting, that it is always the por- tion that is sold, that determines the price of the whole product, in the place where it is produced. If wheat will sell at Chicago for one dollar per bushel, and the cost of transportation to that city from some place in the interior — Chicago being the nearest commercial centre — be seventy-five cents on every bushel that is carried thither, twenty-five cents will be the price of every bushel that is raised at the place where it is raised, no matter how much there may be of it, or how little. 204 POLITICAL ECONOMY. lOy. It determines also the price of all other ar- ticles. Nor is this all. Not only does the portion of wheat carried to the market and sold there, deter- mine the price of all the wheat that is raised in the place from which it is carried, but it deternmies also the price of all other commodities, and of labor itself. For, suppose wheat is worth one dollar per bushel in Chicago, and but twenty-five cents per bushel at some place in the interior, from which to Chicago the cartage is worth seventy-five cents per bushel ; then twenty-five cents per bushel is the price of wheat there. If, now, other articles could be raised and sold at prices such as to enable the producer to make a larger rate of profit, than he could by rais- ing wheat at that price, he would raise no wheat, but only the other and more profitable articles. But our supposition implies that he continues to raise wheat. If so, other articles must sell so low, that the raising of them is no more remunerative, than the raising of wheat. And if that be the case, then labor itself can command only very low wages ; wages as much below what they are in Chicago, as wheat is cheaper in its money price, in the one place, than it is in the other. But of course if a new centre — a new market — EXCHANGE. 205 arises, and more especially if it be a manufacturing village, there is a new demand. Prices will rise, to nearly, perhaps quite to the rates they bear in the old and larger centres ; and of course all the pro- ducers in that neighborhood will be benefited by a rise in the price of the articles of their production, by the saving in distance and expense of transporta- tion thereby produced. We have now seen how trade and exchange adds to the wealth of a community and we have considered both the reasons for it and the limits within which it is, or can be, of any advantage to that community. 168. A comjnon mistake with regard to the benefits of trade. There is, however, a very common mistake in re- gard to the function of trade or commerce, in in- creasing the wealth of the world. It has been very natural, in a country or community where trade is the principal occupation, to regard the profits, and the rate of profits of the traders, as the chief indica- tion, if not the chief source, of wealth. But the statements already made are a sufficient refutation of this error. Another error kindred to it, '=as the doctrine that it is the amount of capital engaged in making the 2o6 POLITICAL ECONOMY. exchanges that determines the amount of exchanges that will be made. In favor of this view, is the obvious fact, that trade produces about the same rate of profit on the capital invested, whether that capital be much or little, or, if anything, more when the capital is large. At all events, the amount of profits is larger, if not the rate, with much than with little capital. And hence the easy inference, that the more trade and the more capital invested in trade, the better. But there are two mistakes in this theory, either of which would be fatal. (i) In the first place, it is not the amount of capital that determines the amount of exchange. It is rather the productiveness of labor. There can be no exchange where there is nothing produced to to be exchanged. And men produce, and mer- chants buy, only what they can sell, and make a profit by so doing. i6g. Thrift determines the amount of exchanges. But they can sell only on condition that there are people enough to be consumers who are able to buy and pay for what is for sale ; and they will be able to do this just to the extent that tJieir oiun labor is productive, or what is the same thing, the rate of wages is high ; the poor, poverty-stricken millions EXCHANGE. 207 of Ireland, and Turkey, for example, do not give occasion to so much trade as the same number of thousands do in some of the more thrifty parts of New England, or of New York State. (2) The second error arises from not considering the fact already stated that, as in manufactures, so in trade there is a limit, in any given state of agricult- ural production, to the extent to which any benefit can be derived from those operations. When a com- modity has reached its highest intrinsic value, manu- facture can go no further. So when the cost of transportation is more than the difference between the cost of production in two places, exchange, im- plying as it does transportation, can be of no benefit to the community , but rather a loss, how much so- ever the merchant may make by it. Now the less capital that can be made sufficient for the accomplishment of this amount of trade, the better for the community. Hence it is manifest that anything that can dimin- ish the cost of transportation, will be just so much added to the distributive wealth of the community. And this, as already said, can be done in either of three ways. (i) Bringing the producer and consumer as near together as possible. (2) By building railroads, etc., by which we utilize, as far as may be, the forces of nature in making the transportation for us. 2o8 POLITICAL ECONOMY. And of the two, manifestly the former is the best, so far as it can be effected, since it saves all that is expended in making the roads, equipping and fur- nishing them to be added to the distributive wealth. Many of the difficulties of exchange, however, can- not be overcome in this way. Railroads, ships, etc., will always remain a necessity. Of course, not every article in every place will have the same commercial centre. London, as we have seen, is the commercial centre of gold and silver for the world, and they have no other. So also for cotton goods. New York is the commercial centre for wheat on this continent, when it is so low abroad, or so high here, as not to bear transporta- tion to the European markets. But besides this, many articles, as garden vegetables, etc., each have their centres all over the country. And in fact every village of a few hundred inhabitants becomes a commercial centre for some of the articles that are produced in the immediate vicinity. Dr. Elder (Questions of the Day, p. 183) remarks: "One more carpenter, blacksmith, shoemaker or other artizan in every township of the United States would give a larger, surer, and better market to its farmers than all the foreign world ever did or ever will afford." But I can see no gain from an increase in the number of these manufacturers, if the manu- facturing of these kinds was already done sufficiently EXCHANGE. 209 for all the wants of the people in the neighborhoods, whether the increase come from either of the two possible sources, (i) immigrant laborers, thus in- creasing the population, or (2) the conversion of agriculturists into mechanics. But if the increase were from the coming into the neighborhood of persons who would add a new branch to its industry, and produce the things which we now import from foreign countries or bring from a distance, the villages that would thus spring up w^ould be new commercial centres and markets, to work up the raw material and eat up the food where both raw material and food are pro- duced ; then there would be a saving to the farmers, and through them to the wealth of the world, to the amount of a large share of the cost of transportation, which is now, to so large an extent, the reason of the comparatively low price of all agricultural prod- ucts, and the high price of all manufactured articles, in all places that are far remote from the commercial centres that furnish a market for what they produce. I JO. Benefits of proximate exchanges, I believe I have thus enumerated all the elements that enter into the difference between proximate and remote exchange — they are these: (i) The cost of transportation. 14 zro POLITICAL ECONOMY. (2) The fact,, that with but short distances be- tween the producer and the consumer, any of the most remunerative articles can be produced, which,, however, will not bear long transportation, and their production becomes impracticable when the people are scattered thinly over a large territory. (3) I will add one more. The manure which is^ needed to keep the land fram getting worn out, is- produced at the place of consumption. In any village it is- produced in abundance, and sold by tons, to be carried back to the farm and garden. But the commodity is so bulky, in pro- portion to its value, that it cannot be carried far. If, therefore, the consumer and producer are far apart, the land of the producer must ultimately be- come impoverished — his machinery of reproduction is worn out. The value of this element may be shown by the fact that in 1850, the annual value of the manure applied to the soil in Great Britain, was $516,845,- 698,, a sum far exceeding all its foreign trade. Of course this must have been mostly lost if, like- some of our southern and western States-, the English had confined themselves to the raising of the raw material only, and exported it for manufacture and consumption elsewhere EXCHANGE. 211 lyi. Articles should be manufactured at the place of production. It is a very important deduction from the forego- ing discussion, that all commodities should be car- ried to the highest practicable form of intrinsic value before transportation ; that is, they should be finished as nearly as may be, and so put in their form for final consumption, as near to the place of produc- tion as possible, before transportation. Since in this case, the cost of transportation is a less per cent, of their value at the place of consumption, and the price will be lower by just that amount. Thus it costs about ten per cent, of its value, to carry a bale of cotton from Tennessee to Lowell, or Manchester. It does not cost a tenth of one per cent, of its value to bring it back as manufactured muslins, etc. Hence, if it must be carried at all, (and it must be carried, since the cotton will not grow either in England or New England) it would be vastly better, for both the aggregate and the dis- tributive wealth of the world, to manufacture it in Tennessee, and transport it both ways after its man- ufacture, rather than carry it in the form of raw material in either direction. 212 POLITICAL ECONOMY.. jyz. Dijference in facility for manufacture and production^ It has sometimes been claimed that one nation may have special facilities for one kind of industry not possessed by others, that should be a controlling consideration. If the "special facilities" are intended to include cheapness of labor, I will postpone the consideratiork of that element for a moment. It is admitted that for the production of agricult- ural and fnineral commodities, there are facilities of climate and location that are controlling, because they cannot be overcome. Tropical fruits must be raised in the tropics, and minerals must be dug out of the earth where the Creator has placed them. And we may as well admit, in regard to manu- factures of the higher grade, (i) That the warmer and more tropical parts of the earth's surface are not so well adapted to them as the temperate zones, while these zones are better adapted to the production of the greater agricultural staples. (2) That the hilly and less productive portions of the temperate zones, where water-power and fuel are usually abundant, are better fitted for manu- factures than those portions that are better adapted to the production of the raw material, so that in all EXCHANGE. 213 probability, the greater proportion of the manufac- turing of those articles, whose manufacture requires the most labor and the most machine force, will al- ways be done in the less productive districts of the temperate zone. And every dollar that is unsclj ■expended in building railroads, or improving the facilities for ship transportation, is giving to these elements, or "natural facilities," increased power by reduction of the cost of transportation. Nor is this all ; there is many a region in which there is good water-power, healthy and invigorat- ing climate, favorable to manufactures — particularly so — which are, nevertheless, so unfavorable to agri- culture, from poverty of the soil, etc., as to afford an advantage for manufactures that will overcome a large amount of cost of transportation. lyj. TJie great ivealth of comtnercial centres. Now as we have the two results, (i) The producer bears the expense of transpor- tation to the commercial centre. (2) The consumer bears it frovi the centre to the places of consumption. We have the following deduction : producers living far from such centres, will, as a general thing, be correspondingly and in the average, poorer, for — (i) As producers, they pay more cost of trans- 214 POLITICAL ECONOMY. portation on what they produce, than those who live nearer to the centre ; and (2) As consumers,, they pay more cost of trans- portation on what they have occasion to buy. Hence in general,- in all places remote from com- mercial centres, agricultural products- — the products of the labor done there — are cheaper, while manu- factured articles — the product of labor not done there — are high, since the people have the double trans- portation to pay, or rather, because the amount they have to pay, under both these heads, is greater, the farther from the market. The only counteracting influence to this rule,, arises from the fact, that as we approach such a centre^ land rises in value, and rents become higher. This goes far towards equalizing the condition of the inhabitants in reference to the acquisition of wealth, for all those who occupy lands that are used for agricultural purposes, since their rent is always in proportion to their productive value, the cost of transportation being taken into account. But always, as we approach any commercial centre, there is a point at which the httrinsic value of land is greater for building purposes than for agricultural, and then it passes under the influence of another law, any increase of rent for such pur- poses, becomes an addition to the cost of living in another way ; this cost must be added by the mer- EXCHANGE. 215 chant to the price of what he sells. In the same way, it must be added by every manufacturer to the articles he produces, while living within the influence of this law. Hence in large cities we have a counteracting in- fluence which brings the cost of the amount of the necessaries of life, required to support an individual, so high, that what is left to the laborer after paying for them, is not more than the wages of one who lives more remote from the commercial centre. ij^. Inference in favor of free labor and free trade^ I have thus far considered exchange on the most broad and general principles. Our investigations in the preceding chapters in regard to production, have taught us that for the maximum of distributive wealth, we must have a dense population, that we may have, (i) The greatest diversification of labor. (2) The minimum of expense in exchanges. These must also be in order, that competition and the law of supply and demand may have their proper influence, (i) Free labor, — that is, each man must be left to do that which he prefers, that which he can do to the best advantage, and with the best satisfaction to 2i6 POLITICAL ECONOMY. himself. In this way he will contribute the largest amount to the wealth of the community in which he lives. (2) Free trade, — that is, the unrestrained freedoms of each man to buy of whom he pleases^ and on what terms he pleases, provided, of course, that the other parties are willing. Free Labor and Free Tirade, — these are two prime conditions of the greatest increase of wealth and the best promotion of human happiness and welfare, in so far as they are dependent on the existence and distribution of wealth. Hence the famous maxim in regard to these things, "" Laissez faire," or, in the more pungent maxim of Lord Falkland, "Where there is no necessity for legislation, there is a neces- sity for no legislation." All legislation and interference with human liberty is an evil, and can be justified only on the ground that it is the least of the two or more evils from which a choice must be made, 775. Governments not satisfied with this. But governments have not been at all careful to observe these wise precautions. In no nation on the face of the earth, except our own, is labor free in the sense here intended. For the existence of an oligarchy or an aristocracy with hereditary EXCHANGE. 217 political powers is necessarily and inevitably an interference with the freedom of a portion of the community, and that portion will of course be the laborers, who are despoiled of political rights. The laws will be made, as in England they have for centuries avowedly been made, in the interests of capital. Nor have governments been quite willing to leave their citizens and subjects to free trade. These restrictions on trade may be either domestic or foreign ; restrictions upon the trade of one citizen with another, or upon the trade of citizens with foreigners. Of these restrictions I will mention three, two domestic and one foreign. lyd. I. Monopolies, copy and patent rights. I. And first, monopolies. A monopoly is the power of one man or a class of men, constituting what is virtually a close corporation, to control the production and sale of some one article or class of articles. A monopoly therefore precludes competition, which is the only means of bringing the prices of all things to the level of justice and equality. For, as a general law, wherever there can be combination there will be no competition. 2i8 POLITICAL ECONOMY. The form of monopolies, that has thus far been able to maintain its place, is found in the case of patent rights, and copy rights. Thus far, no other practicable measures have been devised for rewarding the inventor or discoverer. The product of his labor is — when first introduced — new. It has no market value fixed, and we have no way of estimating its value as a means of increased efficiency to labor, or of promoting the welfare of mankind. Hence, there seems to be no way but to let the inventor try it, offer it for sale on his own terms, protect him from competition for a short time, and then end his monopoly by the expiration of his right. 777. II. Usury laws. II. Most governments have found, and still find it necessary, in order to protect a certain class in the freedom of their labor, to fix a legal rate of interest, and to regard the taking of more as a misdemeanor punishable by law. These laws have never been found to prevent cer- tain persons from hiring money at more than the legal rate, whenever they have found occasion to do so ; violating the spirit of the law perhaps, but not transgressing its letter in such a way as to make them liable to any penalty the law might inflict. EXCHANGE. 219 But it is found that without some rate of interest, fixed by law, there is always a tendency, with cer- tain kinds of persons, to take advantage of the neces- sities of others, and compel them to make contracts with high rates of interest, and what is still more, to take advantage of opportunities to compel their debtors either, (i) to raise the interest, or (2) to sacrifice what property they have. The argument against usury laws that is most commonly urged, is, that money is like anything else that a man has. He should be left free to buy and sell, borrow and lend, on any terms he can agree upon, any conditions he can make with the other party — that leave the borrower and the lender free to bargain with each other as they please, and the competition under the law of supply and de- mand will bring the price of money, that is, the rate of interest, to its lowest figure. I J 8. Arguments in their favor. But to this, the answer usually given is two-fold. (i) Money is not in all respects like other com- modities ; of this I shall say something in the next chapter. We shall then see that in two or three most important respects it is unlike any other com- modity. (2) In the second place, it is claimed, that in - 220 POLITICAL ECONOMY. every case where the matter has been tried, the abolition of all usury laws, leaving the borrower and lender entirely unrestrained, the effect has been to raise the average rate of interest. This, however, is rather a question of statesman- ship than of Political Economy, and Jt would lead me too far from my plan to discuss it here. I may add, however, that I beHeve the proposition is well sustained, and furnishes therefore another fact to be accounted for by the Political Economist. It cannot be said, that the only thing we are to infer from the fact that the rate of interest rises whenever the usury laws are abolished, is, that it was too low before. I think it can be shown every- where, that whenever a rate of interest is fixed by law, money can ordinarily be hired on good security at rates below the legal rate. Now, under the operation of laws that have been discussed in the last chapter, if the legal rate were too low, nobody would be a lender. Wishing to make money as fast as possible, he would invest his funds in some- thing else, rather than lend it on mere simple inter- est. If the legal rate were not as high as is neces- sary to enable the lender to make the average rate of profit by lending his money, it would certainly be raised by an act of the law-making power. It is claimed, nevertheless, that we should leave people in this, as in all other respects, to put their EXCHANGE. 221 own estimate on what they buy, and pay for it whatever they can afford, and in accordance with their own estimate of its intrinsic value to them ; let them buy it as they please, and at any price they may choose to give for it. This might be well if only they were buying money ; but they are borrowing rather than buying. And if a man already involved and embarrassed tries to borrow, to help him out of his difficulty or save his reputation, and gives as security a lien upon what he has, he is really defrauding the old credit- ors in favor of the new one he makes by borrowing. If he really succeeds by this means and saves himself so as to pay all of his old liabilities, it is well, and nobody is the w^orse for his transaction, perhaps. But if he fails, as men who are driven to the necessity of borrowing at rates of interest above that established by law are pretty sure to do, then of course there will be only the less left for those whom he was owing when he effected the loan at such high rates ; in consequence of the loan he had made they are losers by the operation. I'jg. III. Tariff, for rcvcmce. III. Tariff. A tariff is a tax imposed on articles that are brought into a country, across the national boundary, for sale and consumption. 2 22 POLITICAL ECONOMY. It Is first to be considered as a means of revenue, and then, in regard to protection. A tariff, for whatever purpose imposed, is an ob- stacle to freedom of trade between the citizens and subjects of different nations. Its only recommendation as a means of revenue, is the convenience of collecting it, and collecting it too, in amounts sufficient to answer the purposes and wants of government, without much complaint on the part of those who pay it. Without a tariff for revenue, the means to carry on the government must be raised by a direct tax on the people, or a tax on articles of home produc- tion. And in either case it is likely to be paid by the people, very much in proportion to their means, and hence many of them will complain. But if raised by a tariff, they pay their taxes when they buy their goods, and are not aware how much of their purchase money goes for the tariff, and how much for the intrinsic value of what they buy. 1 80. Objections to it. To this method of raising a revenue for the gov- ernment — a tariff for revenue — Political Economists have been accustomed pretty uniformly, to urge two very serious objections, without, however, having ever yet succeeded in accomplishing much by their objections, namely : EXCHANGE. 223 (i) It encourages extravagance in the govern- mental expenditures ; the money comes indirectly from the people, and in such a way that no one really knows how much he pays, and consequently nobody feels it as he would if he paid it directly. Hence, the people are not apt to watch the appro- priations and expenditures of the government, so closely as they otherwise would. (2) The burden usually falls very unequally upon the people. When the revenue is raised by tariff, no man pays according to his property, or his in- come, but only and solely in proportion to the amount he consumes of the article that is taxed. Hence, it often happens that a poor man, by con- suming more of the article that is taxed, pays more of the taxes that go to support the general govern- ment, than the rich man. In fact, this inequality is almost if not quite an inevitable result, of a tariff for revenue. But it soon occurs to the statesman, that the tariff which the wants of the government make a ne- cessity, may as well be so arranged as to favor do- mestic industry, and promote the welfare of the people who are thus taxed. 181. Effect of tariff on importations. Mr. Carey, (Harmony of Interest, 1856,) en- 224 POLITICAL ECONOMY. deavors to show that a tarifif for revenue has never produced enough for revenue, in any one instance when it has been tried. He also claims to have shown that more goods are actually imported under a high tarifif, if it only be so adjusted as to be pro- tective, than under any tarifif that fails of protection, however low. He draws from this, however, not the most natural and obvious inference that would be expected, namely: that ''protection does not pro- tect,'' but rather that it does protect, and that, too, so efifectually that under its influence the people of a nation can buy, notwithstanding the higher prices which it occasions, more than they could without it. People can buy only what they can pay for, and what they can pay for depends upon the amount and the productiveness of their own labor ; or what is the same thing, the amount of work they can get to do, and the amount of wages they can get for doing it. And this, it seems to me, is a sound and satisfac- tory inference. Under protection, domestic industry is so much more thriving and prosperous that the surplus, beyond domestic consumption, is so much greater than under a low tarifif, as to create the greater demand for foreign productions. He de- pends upon two propositions for this inference. (i) Whatever is produced will be sold in ex- change for other commodities, excepting, of course. EXCHANGE. 225 what is needed by the producers themselves for their own immediate consumption. (2) The amount which we import from foreign countries, after correcting for variations in the bal- ance of trade, is an indication of the thrift and pro- ductiveness of labor at home. There can be no doubt that the greater the amount of the products of labor in any one year, year by year, the greater will be the amount of domestic exchanges ; that is, the greater will be the amount of purchases and sales of the people them- selves, one with another. And so long as there are objects of foreign production which the people want, the greater the amount they may have left after purchasing the articles of domestic production which they must have, so much the greater will be the amount of those foreign products that will be in demand, to act as stimulus to the enterprise of the importers. But an increase of imports, so long as there is an increasing balance of trade against us equal to the increase of imports, is no indication of thrift at home. With this caution, it seems to me that Mr. Carey's facts, and his inferences from them, are well made out and eminently worthy the attention of the statesrnen and legislators of our country. 15 226 POLITICAL ECONOMY. 182. What makes a tariff protective. A tariff, to be protective to any particular form of industry, must, of course, always be equal to the difference between the rate^ at which the commodity can be produced in the country of its production,, and that at which it can be produced in the country of its consumption. Thus,, if cotton cloth can be produced in England, and sold, after cost of trans- portation here,^ for ten cents per yard, and it cannot be produced here for less than twelve, two cents per yard would be a protective tariff^ and anything be- low that could not operate as protection ; above that, it would be,, virtually, prohibition, 18^. Effect of a taHff that is below protection.. A tariff that falls below the point at which it is protective, cannot fail to increase the price of the article to the consumer ; for it would raise the price of the article by the amount of the tariff, without creating any competition among domestic producers,, so as to reduce the price, by means of their compe- tition, one with another. Or again, a tariff upon articles, that for any reason a nation cannot produce, as for example, cotton in England, would only enhance the price to the ex- tent of the tariff, and for the same reason, as a EXCHANGE. 227 "'reventie tariff," as it is sometimes called, would raise prices there permanently. There are, or can be no domestic producers to reduce it by competi- tion, (i) among themselves, or (2) with the foreign producers. A tariff then, upon articles which we cannot pro- duce, or a tariff that fails .to be protective upon what we can produce, but does not only increases the price of the article to the consumer. And even a tariff for protection, if it be needed at all for that purpose, will raise the price of the imported article for the time being. But if it be an article which the laborers of that country can pro- duce to advantage, the tariff will have the effect of creating an increased demand for labor, and thus, by raising the price of labor in all branches of industry, it will enable the people of the country generally to buy the article more easily than before, even at the advanced price. / defense : to the effect,, namely, that Free Trade was not an absolute doctrine, but a question of circum- stances. ' Certainly ' was his answer, ' I have never affirmed anything to the contrary. I do not presume to say that the United States may not find protection expedient in their present state of devel- opment. I do not even say, that if I were an American I should not be a Protectionist' He added that he believed the best of Protectionists- held that doctrine as a temporary one, which they stood ready to exchange or modify, when the coun- try should have proved itself able to compete with European manufactures." /p-/. Classes of persons that are not likely to favor protection. There are, however, certain classes of persons,, who, for one reason or other, are not likely to be persuaded into protection ; they are, (i) Salaried men who live on fixed means. Their income is fixed and does not vary with the fluctua- tions in price. Free trade would therefore reduce the price of many of the articles they have occasion to buy, without reducing at all the amount of their EXCHANGE. 243 salaries ; or at least, so they think, and hence free trade is to them virtually an increase of salary, to -quite a per cent. (2) For the same reasons, rich persons, whose ■money is to a large extent or wholly invested in government stocks, banking, etc., where the rate of interest is regarded as independent of the price of the ordinary commodities of consumption. Free trade is for them the same in effect as an increase of interest, or the per cent, of the dividend on the stocks they own. (3) Merchants, brokers, bankers, etc., especialh' in seaport towns. Their business consists in trade, and to a large extent in foreign trade, and as their profits are a per cent, on their capital, and vary with the amount of business, they will advocate the policy that produces the most business in their line, free trade. (4) All those persons whose business is such as to allow of no foreign competition. Of this class, .perhaps newspaper proprietors are the best illustra- tion. The New York Herald, Times, Tribune, World, etc.^ could no more be made, printed, and published in England, and brought here for sale, than coal be mined in New York, or cotton raised in London. They must be made here — written mostly, set up, worked off here, in order to be ready for distribution while they are fresh and new. 244 POLITICAL ECONOMY. But free trade with foreign countries would reduce the cost of paper, ink, articles of most or all kinds^ the cost of the labor of the office also, and that too^ without any reduction in the price at which the pro- prietors of such papers can sell them ; or possibility of rivals made in London or elsewhere, where labor and materials are cheap. /p5. Political motives that may oppose it. Perhaps to these we ought to add a fifth class,, (and I fear there are such in our country) ; I mean all those who believe that an aristocracy of wealth or power is the best form of goverment, or who at least desire such an one for our country. For the effect of free trade with foreign nations, by reducing the wages of the laborer, would of course raise up a wealthy few and reduce the many to such poverty and dependence, that they would be powerless against their richer neighbors, and without hopes or possibility of rising to education, wealth, and means of influence. Such a result might not follow in all countries, and under all circumstances. But there can be no doubt, I think, that it would follow in any country, where the wages of the laborer is higher than the average rate in those countries with which it would thus be brought into commercial relations. The law of competition will effect this. EXCHANGE. 245 ig6. Probability of the continuance of protection in America. Not long since a distinguished professor of Po- litical Economy from England, lecturing in New York, in advocating free trade, remarked that it seemed to him that protection in this country was taxing "the many in the interest of the few; taxing all the citizens of our country to support the mines of Pennsylvania and the factories of New England. This may be so. But if it is, then free trade will surely result in the breaking down of the miners of Pennsylvania, and the manufacturers of New Eng- land, to build up the capitalists of Great Britain. Well, — blood is thicker than water, and I rather think that so long as we must have a tariff for rev- enue, the laborers of our country will insist that it shall be so adjusted as to protect American industry, rather than foreign capital CHAPTER VIIL OF MONEY AND BANKING. Traders between producers and consumers — Money the means of exchange — Theories of moneys — Gold and silver a part of the wealth of a country — What determines their value — Useful for other purposes than coin — Proof of this view — Reasons for using them for coinage — Signification of coinage — Effects of increase of gold and silver — Labor, not money, the standard of value — Importance of this view — Market valoie determines the coin value of silver and gold — Money and trade, how they enrich — Trade enriches individuals — Banks, (i) as places of deposit — Banks, (2) as places of exchange — Saving of labor thereby — Clearing houses — Banks, (3.) for discount and loans^ — Banks, (4) for issue of bills — Paper currency saves loss — Less specie needed — The process of banking — The bankers' resources — Loan of the deposits — The nature of the "loans and discounts" — Loans deposited — Necessity for a specie basis — The effect of redemption — Ratio of specie to loans and dis- counts — Limit to a bank's "circulation" — How banks cause fluctuations in prices — Return to specie payments after suspen- sion — Ratio of specie to circulation in this country — The effects of over-issue — How money differs from other commodities — What determines the amount of paper — Banking compared with other "business" — How determine the amount of paper needed — How determine the amount of specie — Governments MONEY AND BANKING. 247 'Cannot control the amount — How gold and silver affect the amount — Why no more is coined — Effects of inconvertible paper — A practical test proposed — How money gets into cir- culation — Paper not convertible on demand — Premium on gold determined by the ratio of gold to paper. igj. Traders between producers and consumers. I have thus far spoken of exchange as if con- ducted by the producers and consumers without the intervention of any third party, and as though it were an exchange of the simple commodities them- selves. But neither of these conditions often occur. For the most part there is a class of traders interven- ing ; and the commodities are sold and bought for some "circulating medium," as it is called, which is considered as money. ig8. Money the means of exchange. Of the utility of both money and a class of trad- ers, as indirectly increasing wealth, by facilitating exchange, there can be no doubt. The man who has a crop of wheat to sell, can deliver it all at one place, and take the money for it ; this he can carry with him, and use in purchasing other articles. Otherwise he would be obliged to part with a por- tion of his wheat to one man in exchange for what he might happen to want to purchase of him, and another portion to another, and so on. 248 POLITICAL ECONOMY. We have shown in previous chapters, and under several different heads, how traders by diminishing the necessary labor of exchange, add indirectly to- the aggregate and distributive wealth of a commu- nity. In any civilized country some exchanges, besides- those that can be made immediately between the producers and the consumers, are necessary also. And one man can make the exchanges for a large number of persons, with about the same labor, time,, and capital, as for a much smaller number. But he needs some means, implements, or "tool" with which to do it ; this tool, or implement, is money. jgg. Theories of money. Of money there have been several theories. David Hume, who, so far as I recollect, was the first to treat of it in a professedly scientific way, evidently regarded money as constituting the only wealth, or element of wealth in a community. But this is manifestly wrong ; as every product of labor remaining over and above what is consumed in the process of producing it, is a part of the wealth of a nation, or the world at large. And that which is not money, is often more useful than money itself A more recent theory holds that money is no part of wealth, but is only a repvesentation of value; MONEY AND BANKING. 249 a certificate, in the language of Bastiat, "that the bearer has rendered to society services equivalent to the amount of the silver he holds, etc.," for which he has received no pay. 200. Gold and silver a part of the zuealth of a country. But manifestly gold and silver are a part of the wealth of any community, though, not as the earlier writers seem to have supposed, the whole of it ; they obey the same laws, for the most part, as other commodities. In a state of nature, and before the approach of man, they have no exchangeable value ; they are produced by labor, and the quantity which can be obtained per day 07i the average, determines their exchangeable value, as truly and rigorously as this law of production determines the exchangeable value of any other commodity. 201. What deterviincs their valne. This results from the law of supply and demand. If a man wants silver and gold, no matter what for, he will go to digging, if by that means he can get in a given time the amount of those metals he wants, and in the form in which he wants them, by the least amount of labor. But if he can get more of 250 POLITICAL ECONOMY. them In that form in the same time, and with the same labor, by raising wheat, cutting logs, making or laying brick, he will resort to these forms of in- dustry and trust to the possibility of exchanging the commodities he will thus produce for the gold and silver he wants, but does not produce. 202. Useful for other purpose than coin. And in this respect it makes no difference what one may happen to want the gold and silver for. They have a use for other purposes than as a circu- lating medium. This is an important, a controlling fact ; but it is one that is often overlooked. And it is their intrinsic value for other purposes that, together with the average labor required for their reproduction, determines their market price, and the amount that shall be put into coin of any particular denomination, as a dollar, a franc, a sovereign, an eagle, etc. For suppose that an ounce of silver and a sixteenth of an ounce of gold are ordinarily worth one dollar, that is, assuming the dollar to be a con- stant value. If gold and silver increase in quantity more rapidly than the aggregate wealth, the supply is greater, probably because the average cost of re- production is less, and more of them must go to make a dollar. If they become scarcer, it is because of a change MONEY AND BANKING. 251 in the labor cost of reproduction, and the dollar must weigh less, or it will be worth more. 20J. Proof of this viezv. To test this, suppose gold and silver have become more abundant, and by the law of supply and de- mand, cheaper than formerly ; the farmer, for ex- ample, will not sell his wheat for the same amount of gold and silver, as before. He will demand more. This will be indicated, indeed, as a rise in the price of wheat. It is more properly, a decline in the price of silver and gold. Or, on the other hand, suppose that gold and silver become scarce — the coin will be sought and used in the manufacture of gold and silver ware — they will rise in price, and nobody will pay them out for ordinary commodities except at a reduced nominal price of those com- modities. In such cases, the commodities are usually said to fall in value. But it is more proper to say, that the gold and silver have risen in price. 20:1-. Reasons for using them for coinage. It is undoubtedly true, however, that gold and silver, besides being otherwise the most convenient things to serve as a means of exchange, are also more nearly uniform in their average cost of repro- 252 POLITICAL ECONOMY. duction, as well as in intrinsic value, than any other commodity. Hence, we have in general, five pe- culiarities by which they seem to be better qualified than anything else, for the use of ej^change. (i) They are of more nearly uniform intrinsic value. The gold and silver of different mines are of the same quality. (2) They condense an amount of exchangeable value within a small compass, larger than almost anything else. (3) They are more nearly uniform in exchange- able value, than any other available commodity ; it taking about as much labor to get them from the mines in one age, as in another. (4) They are more easily coined into convenient forms than anything else, that is valuable enough (per pound) to answer the purpose. (5) I add a fifth. Such is their nature, that the process of coining them, or manufacturing them into money, does not, in the least, injure or impair their intrinsic value for other purposes. In most cases, on the contrary, the manufacture of a material into any one kind of article, ruins and spoils it for all others. 205. Significance of coinage. Coining is generally, — always, in latter times — MONEY AND BANKING. 253 done by the government. And this. is in order to prevent abuses. The objects and significance of coining, may be referred to two heads ; the im- pression stamped on each piece, is a certificate of two facts. (i) That the piece so stamped, has a certain weight, — and thus the coining saves the necessity of weighing every time an exchange is made. (2) That the piece is of a given purity ; this is important, for, being alloyed with cheaper and baser metals, it might have the same weight as another piece, and yet be of a very inferior value. 206. Effects of the increase of gold and silver. It would be easy to trace the history of money, and show how, in every case, (i) any increase in the aggregate wealth, ivitJiout a corresponding increase in the quantity of the precious metals, has resulted in an increase of their price, and, (2) how any sud- den increase in their quantity, as by the discovery of new mines, has resulted in their decline in price, or, which is the same thing, and a more adequate expression of it, — there has been a rise in the price of all other things. zoj. Labor, not money, the standard of value. Money itself, then, being the product of labor, 254 POLITICAL ECONOMY. obeys the law already laid down. An ounce of silver, if that be the quantity we call a dollar, is the product of the labor expended in mining, coining, etc., that piece of silver, and must depend for its value, upon the average cost (labor) of reproduction. If a new mine should be discovered, and if new means for mining, etc., should be invented, so that an ounce of silver could be obtained by one half the labor it now costs, and that, too, in an unlimited quantity, the price of all things would rise — if we should still continue to make silver the standard — in nearly the same proportion ; the fact would be that silver had become cheaper. "Writers usually put the intrinsic value of the precious metals as measured by their purchasing power, in the reign of Henry VIII, or about three centuries ago (A. D. 1509 — 1547) at twelve times greater than now. But for want of a standard to measure the intrinsic value, or labor cost of the metals themselves, there is no proof of any tolerable exactness in the estimates that are made, even by the most capable persons, of the change of value of an ounce of gold or silver, after the lapse of cen- turies. And, if difficult for long periods, the rate of the process from day to day, or from year to year, is no less so, though of less moment. But the general fact is indisputable, that gold and silver have grown several times intrinsically cheaper, than MONE V AND BANKING. 2 5 5 they were before the discovery of America, by Co- lumbus." (Elder, Q. of Day, pp. 113 — 114.) But labor is a constant. It is the product of time into human strength. Now the strength of men varies undoubtedly, if we compare man with man, at any time or in any place. But the average strength of men, in one age or place, is so nearly the same as that of any other time or place, that we may, for all our present purposes, assume it to be the same. Hence strength is a constant quantity. Time is, of course, measured by the revolutions of the earth, and a day is twenty-four hours, the number of hours out of the twenty-four during which men can labor, however much it may vary if we compare individual cases one with another, affords, nevertheless, a constant average ; the men of to-day, and of this country, can work just about as many hours a day, on the average, as those of any country or age. Hence time for labor is a con- stant quantity. And with these two, labor will vary ; two men unequal in strength, will perform equally dispropor- tionate amounts of labor in a given time. Or, two men of equal strength will perform different amounts of labor in unequal times, the difference varying as the time. But at this average they become constant, that is, when men work all the time they can and with all their strength. We have the formula, 2:56 POLITICAL ECONOMY. Tx S = L and TdS-\- SdT=dL that is, time multiplied into strength gives the amount of labor. And as the time of labor and the strength with which men can labor, are both, when at their average or at their maximum, in fact, con- stant, the product is constant, and we have in that — which nothing else can afford — a constant standard of value. 208. Importance of this view. To this everything, gold and silver no less than wheat, iron, cloth, etc., must conform ; and they be- come really cheap or dear, cost much or little, just as they can be obtained with much or little labor. Hence it is that we never know whether a laborer is in a good condition merely by knowing the amount of his wages in gold and silver. We want to know what the means of living cost, bread, fuel, clothes, house rent, etc., how much of these he can obtain for a day's work, or a week's work ; for the days and weeks of a year are limited, and in each the year comes around with the vicissitudes of sum- mer and winter, seed time and harvest. MONE Y AND BANKING. iii 2og. Market value determines the coin value of gold and silver. There is one more consideration of great impor- tance bearing upon the coin value of silver and gold. Being in demand for other purposes, and being not at all injured for other purposes by coinage, if the coin contains more silver than can be bought in the ingot for its price, say a dollar, the manufacturers will buy up the coin and melt it over for the manu- facture of their wares, until the coin is all bought up, or has risen in price on account of the scarcity thus created. Or on the other hand, suppose the coin contains less silver than can be bought in the ingot for the same money, the coin is below par, no one Avill take it in payment except at a discount, and then, of course, it is driven out of market as uncur- rent. The same is true, of course, of gold. Hence we see that coin cannot be kept in circula- tion unless the quantity in a dollar, for example, is equal to what can be bought in the mass, for a dollar of other money, or a dollar's worth of any other commodity, labor itself included. 210. Money and trade, hoiu they enrich. In this view of gold and silver I think we find an ample justification for the assertion that they are 258 POLITICAL ECONOMY. like any other product of labor, a part of the wealth of the community, and cannot be regarded as the entire wealth, nor yet as mere representatives of wealth. The man Vvdio has received a piece of silver or gold for his work, has received his pay in full, as truly and as completely as if he had received any other commodity, article of food or clothing. And the view taken of traders in these lectures differs as widely from the more prevalent ones as it does in regard to money. It is very commonly thought, that because the richest men in a commu- nity are usually f^und among traders, and because commercial cities are the wealthiest, therefore, it is trade and the traders that make the wealth of a community. Exchange is indeed indispensable tO' wealth, and a class of traders is useful as a help tO' making the exchanges; but traders, as we have seen, neither produce the quantity, nor increase the intrinsic value — the two factors whose product is the wealth of a community. 211, Trade enriches individuals. Trade, however, conduces more than any other kind of business to that unequal distribution of wealth which rises into view, in the form of great fortunes — to be counted by millions. And there- fore it is that it holds out special inducements to those MONE Y AND BANKING. 2 59 who are anxious to grow rich rapidly, to amass large •fortunes ; and therefore it is that trade is supposed to be the most efficient means of making money, or of increasing wealth, when in fact, it is least so of all, if we regard the welfare of the community, rather than the aggrandizement of individuals. It affords to individuals the most rapid means of amassing a fortune, while of the great branches, agriculture, manufactures, and trade, it is the least conducive to the increase of the wealth of the country. After the introduction of money, the next great agent for saving labor in making exchanges, is banking and banks. The Bank of Amsterdam, established A. D. 1609, was the earliest considerable institution of this kind which looked to the promotion of commerce among the people ; its predecessors of the twelfth century in Venice and Genoa having been chiefly devoted to the management of state finances. This bank was guaranteed by, and under the authorit}' of, the city. It continued to promote the prosperity of the city for nearly two centuries. It failed in 1790. Banks, or banking, as conducted in our time are for four distinct functions. 212. Banks, ( i) as places of deposit. Money being an object of almost, if not quite, z6o POLITICAL ECONOMY. universal desire, and being also a commodity that can more easily than anything else be carried away and concealed, if once stolen,^ becomes an object of property calling for especial efforts to protect it against theft, burglary, etc. And it requires about as much labor and expense to provide for the safe keeping of a small sum, as for that of a large one. Hence a vault or repository, in which one man can take care of the money of several men, is likely to occur as a means of economy, at a very early day. The man who keeps it is called a banker, and the money left with him is said to be deposited. 2 1 J. Banks, (2) as places of exchange. Suppose a dozen men employ the same banker to keep their funds. It is not necessary, when any one of them wants his money, or a portion of it, to make a payment to another, that he should actually go and take the money out of the bank and pay it over. A much shorter method is to give the payee a draft on the banker. The draft being taken to the banker, he will credit the amount to the payee and charge it to the payor, and the exchange is as truly made, without the handling or counting of a dollar of the money, as it could be in any other way. The entries in the books must of course be made at any rate. But by this means millions on millions of MONEY AND BANKING. 261 dollars of exchanges may be made without the labor of counting or handhng a single dollar of the money. 21^ Saving of labor thereby. And, in fact, in all civilized countries, a large share of the exchanges and payments are made in this way. Men that have occasion to handle much money, make their deposits in some bank, make all their larger payments in checks, and keep on hand only the amount of money that is necessary for the smaller balances, that are daily and hourly occurring, when it is necessary to effect a balance, pay a bill, or "make change," without the trouble of going to the bank. 2/5. Clearing houses. In towns and cities, where there are several banks, a bank for bankers alone, is usually established. This is sometimes called a "clearing house." So long as there is but one bank in a town, all the men who keep bank accounts at all, will have their deposits there. But, in case there are several, each business man will give checks on the bank he does business with. A, for example, gives B a check, but B has no business with A's banker. He takes the check to his banker. Hence a necessity for the 262 POLITICAL ECONOMY. bankers themselves to exchange with one another ; this is'usually done every day after banking hours* 216. Banks, (j) for discoupJ and loans. It is manifest that if millions of dollars of ex- changes can be made without handling the coin,, they could be made, a large part of them at least,, just as well if there were no coin in the vault at alL But let us now take a different starting point ; let us suppose that a man who has capital (money) tO' lend, starts a bank. He can, not only keep the money of other persons on deposit with his own, and make their exchanges for them ; but besides all this he can lend money of his own to those who may have occasion to borrow. Nor is this all. He can lend, also, a part of that which he has on deposit. After a short time he will, find out about how much comes- in, on the average,, per day, and, of course, also how long,, on the aver- age, each dollar remains with him, and how much on the average, he has on hand at a time. Now suppose he should find that he has, on an average, a hundred thousand dollars on deposit, and that, on the average, each dollar remains with him twenty days, it is manifest that he can lend seventy or eighty thousand dollars of that which he has on deposit, for short periods — anything less than twenty days — MONEY AND BANKING. 265 and yet always be able to meet the drafts that may be drawn upon him by the depositors — always I say — except when the day of winding up operations comes. He must cease making loans before that day arrives, in order to prepare for its arrival. 21^, Batiks (^) for issue of bills. But we have another expedient still, affecting the business of banking, and of making exchanges thereby, namely, the issue of bills or bank notes. Gold and silver, in large quantities, are heavy, and inconvenient, besides being attended with risk and loss. Hence, several consequences. (i) In the first place, drafts on banks, are likely in themselves, to pass from hand to hand for some time, as representatives of the money that is on de- posit in the bank. This the customers themselves will do, rather than take out the money itself, and carry it about with them. (2) But, in the second place, the banker himself may issue his bills, provided he has capital of his own. In this case, instead of keeping the money deposited by each customer, separate and distinct, he counts it, places it to the credit of the depositor, and when he calls for it, gives him his own bills ; that is, pieces of paper on which is written, or printed, or both, a promise to pay a given amount 264 POLITICAL ECONOMY. on demand, at the banking house of the banker who issues it. And this paper "currency" is — ^as gold and silver are not — a mere representative value. As such, it circulates so long as the credit of the banker i& good, and does the work of money quite as effi- ciently and more conveniently than coin itself could do. 218, Paper atrrency saves toss. (i) There is always some wear of coin in use — old coins become defaced. This is a complete and total loss, as much so as if a similar portion of gold and silver had sunk to the bottom of the ocean. (2) Again, some of the coin will be lost in the way last named. A ship sinks at sea ; a confla- gration takes place ; and in other ways coin disap- pears from the use of men. It has been computed that in these ways not less than one per cent, of the coin actually in use is lost annually; this, as we have seen, is nearly half as much as the rate of interest in some of the more wealthy nations of the world. But, (3) There is also safety to the individual himself in having paper that will serve in making his ex- changes, instead of coin. Suppose a man makes a draft, or holds a certifi- MONEY AND BANKING. 265 cate of deposit, and that draft or certificate is lost, he loses nothing but the value of the paper on which it is written, nor does anybody. This is not true of ordinary bank-notes or bills payable to bearer ; but it is true of other forms of representa- tives of value, which one can always take, and with which we can make our exchanges without risk or loss. 2ig. Less specie needed. There is still another very important influence of banking considered as a process of making ex- changes. It enables the banker to make a large amount of exchanges with a small amount of specie. We have seen that the banker can lend a certain portion of his deposits, so that that portion will be doing the work of making exchanges in that form also : and then it is actually doing double work ; (i) As (by supposition) in the vault, serving as the basis of the exchanges that are made ; by drafts emitted to the drawer and charged to the drawer ; and, (2) As actually in circulation, for so it becomes by the very act of lending it, that is, provided the loan is drawn out of the bank. 220. The process of banking. To get at the whole matter at a glance, let us 266 POLITICAL ECONOMY. suppose a man or a company begin banking with a capital, say of $100,000. And for the sake of simplifying our statement, let us leave out of sight all cost of banking house, fixtures, etc., etc. (i) He will need to keep a certain portion of his money on hand, as specie with which to redeem his bills when they are presented for redemption at his counter. An examination of the history of banks shows that the amount of specie needed in a country vil- lage will not be much, if any, over ten per cent, of the capital, or $10,000. In large cities, however, the proportion of specie must be larger, and in commercial towns it is often equal to the entire amount of the circulation, and is sometimes even greater. (2) The remaining $90,000 he can invest in stocks, bonds, and mortages, etc., bearing interest 2X the lawful rate, which is seven per cent, in this State, New York. (3) On this $90,000, however, he can issue his bills, which will circulate as money, or currency rather. These bills he loans, accepting for them notes, etc., on time, and receives also, either interest or discount on the notes, which he thus receives in exchange for his bills. The amount in bills that may be issued is often regulated by law. Thus under the old New York MONEY AND BANKING. 267 system, as it was called, the bank was required to deposit its stocks, bonds, and mortgages, with the State authorities, and receive for them bills — not yet executed by the signatures of the bank officers — equal in amount to the capital thus deposited, which in the case supposed would be $90,000. Something of the kind exists now under our United States banking laws ; that is, some limitation on the amount of bills a bank may issue, an amount proportioned to the capital or the deposits made to secure the redemption of the bills. But in cases where no such restrictions exist, the amount of cir- culation is limited only by the prudential consider- ations of expediency. Some years ago the amount limited by law, in one of the New England States, was double the amount of capital. And in some cases banks have been known to keep afloat three times the amount of their capital for some time. 221. The banker's resources. Let us now consider the banker's resources. He has as means of redeeming his $90,000 of issue, (i) The $10,000 in specie reserved in his vault. (2) The $90,000 in stocks which can, of course, be converted into money. (3) The notes, etc., which he has discounted and in exchange for which he paid out his bills. 268 POLITICAL ECONOMY. And thus with honesty and good capacity on the part of the banker, his bills to the amount of nine or ten times the specie on hand arc entirely safe, and one dollar in money is made to be, or at least to do the work of ten dollars in making the ex- changes that are required in the business world. Of course all these estimates and proportions will change with localities, seasons of the year, and the kinds of business done in the community where the bank is located. But our object has been to state and illustrate the principle rather than to give exact practical working figures, that one might depend upon in going into the banking business. These must be ascertained in each case separately, and on its own merits and peculiarities. 222. Loan of the deposits. I have taken no note, in this discussion, of the fact that a large proportion of the deposits — the deposits ordinarily in our American banks — equal or exceed the amount of the capital as loaned by the bank. A careful computation made a few years ago with the aid of a friend who was an experienced banker, showed that the amount of deposits that were actu- ally loaned in this State, was over seventy per cent., varying all the way from sixty-three or four up to something above eighty per cent, of the deposits. MONEY AND BANKING. 269 The data before us did not enable us to determine the average amount of time for which it was loaned. But probably it would have been quite short, not, I presume, excecdint^ twenty days. But if we look at this as affecting the bank's sol- vency or ability to meet all its liabilities, we see at once that the notes discounted, on which these loans were made, must have exceeded in amount the money but by the discount or interest on them, and they must have left over and above what they amounted to, a portion of the deposits not loaned out at all. But anyhow, a bank is not strengthened — it is rather weakened — by this loan of a portion of its deposits ; the total ratio of resources to liabilities, is reduced by it, and may, of course, be so far reduced as to render the bank unsafe. It is, however, a means of increased profit and income to the banker. Without it, as we have seen, he is able to realize in- terest on a good deal more than the amount of specie in his vaults ; with it, the amount on which he receives interest in excess of his specie is very much increased. And we must remember that the specie in his vaults, is about the only part of the banker's capital that is really at work, and earning the income of the banker. All else rests on this, or draws interest and does its work only because this is there as a basis. 270 POLITICAL ECONOMY. The specie is to the banker, what "the capital," technically and properly so called, of other trades- men, is to them ; and all else, circulation, notes dis- counted, stocks owned, bonds and mortgages on file, are to the banker, what the wares and articles of merchandise are to the trader. They may far ex- ceed in amount, the capital engaged in the business, and necessary for its safe and successful prosecu- tion. 22^. The nature of "the loans and discounts." It may be necessary to state farther, as a means to a fuller comprehension of the whole subject, that "the loans and discounts," as they appear on the banker's books, do not represent, or bear any con- stant relation, to either the specie in the vaults, or the bank-bills issued by the bank, making what is ordinarily discussed under the head of circulation. A glance at any bank statement, or report of the condition of its affairs, will disclose the fact, that as a general thing, the loans and discounts exceed the amount of both specie and circulation ; thus, to use a statement now before me, which is a fair average statement: In the State of New York, Dec. loth, 185 1, the total specie was $8,306,829; thetotal of circulation $26,228,553; making together $34,535,- 382. But the loans and discounts on that day, MONE V AND BANKING. 2 7 r amounted to $104,039,788, or about three times as much as the specie and bills together ; the specie, of course, was not allowed to pass out of their vaults into circulation, so that the loans and discounts were about four times the amount of the bills, or money they had to lend. 22/].. Loans deposited. The explanation is easy. Whenever a customer to a bank makes a loan of large amount, he does not want the loan in money that he can carry away with him. He prefers to have it in the bank, in the shape of credit to his name, so that he can draw upon it to make the payments he may have occasion for in the ordinary course of his business. Hence, when he borrows money, instead of taking the money, he prefers to leave it "on deposit," subject to his order. But there may be no money, as we have seen, that could be counted out and passed into his hands over the counter ; none, for the reason that the loans and discounts exceed the money, by about four to one. So, when the draft comes in, the party to whom it has been given by the depositor in payment, may not want the money ; many of them will not want it ; they will merely want to have the amount credited to them in their bank account, to be drawn against in like manner by themselves, when occasion may require. 272 POLITICAL ECONOMY. In the same way, the items of deposits greatly exceed the amount, whether in currency or in specie, that has actually been deposited ; that is, passed over the counter of the banks into their custody. It consists largely of the "loans and discounts" that have not been paid, but only passed to the credit of the borrower. 22^. Necessity for a specie basis. This brings us to the very important question of specie payments, or what is called in other words, "the solvency of a bank." The solvency of a bank, and the possibility of specie payments, must depend, of course, upon a certain ratio between the specie in the vaults, and the bills in circulation. The paper thus issued, it will be remembered, has in itself no intrinsic value, or but little as old paper — perhaps three cents a pound. Its value consists in its being evidence of ownership ; or, as is sometimes said, the intrinsic value consists not in the paper, but in the responsibility of the parties that issue it as a "promise to pay;" but more cor- rectly in its being evidence of the obligation to pay the amount of the face of the bill. Suppose, for example, I buy a piece of land. Since I cannot remove it, I take a deed of it; that MONEY A^W BANKING. 273 deed is evidence of ownership, and as such has an intrinsic value far exceeding that of mere blank paper. Suppose, again, I buy a horse, and do not wish to take it away at the time ; I take a bill of sale, and that is proof of ownership, and entitles me to take the horse at a subsequent time, as by contract agreed upon. Suppose, again, I lend a man a sum of money, or work for him a day. I acquire thereby a right of ownership in something that is in his possession. He gives me his note, and that entitles and enables me to go and demand something equal in value to what is specified in the note or due-bill, and usually estimated in money ; and in case he refuses or neglects to pay me, it authorizes me to take some- thing of his as payment. But suppose, again, instead of giving me his note he gives me bank-notes, or bank-bills, as we usually call them. I release him, and have no further claim on him, but I become OAvner by that fact, and to the extent of the face of the bills, of the stock and other property of the bank, although of course I am not regarded in law, nor am I in fact, a stock- holder, technically so called. 226. The effect of redemption. And if a bank should be obliged on any one day 18 274 POLITICAL ECONOMY. to redeem or take in all its bills, the bank would have the bills indeed, but the former bill holders would have the capital, and all that the former stockholders would have would be the notes, etc.,. which they had discounted. These^ in like manner,, would be in their hands- evidence in the ownership in the property of their customers for whom they had granted the discounts,, and their value could be collected out of these bor- rowers. And thus,, if at any one moment,, all paper money, together with all other forms of paper evi- dence of ownership or indebtedness, should be destroyed,, or pass on according to its original destination until it shall have reached maturity and accomplished its object,, there would be indeed a change in the fact of ownership, but no change in the real aggregate wealth of a community. Only a vast amount of property would very suddenly "change hands/' as the expression is, and rest in the hands of the true owners, so that the visible and apparent, and the real or true,, owners would be the same parties. But this case can never come until the final day of doom, and then we shall all have something else to think of besides getting our share of the pelf and peltry of this world. MONEY AND BANKING. 275 32y. Ratio of specie to loans and discounts. At all times some specie will be wanted for change, and some will be wanted for foreign ex- change, etc. Now so long as people can get enough for such uses, they do not want more : they had rather have paper, provided the banks are "good." Bankers soon find by experience {and we may, by studying their reports) how much specie they need to meet their wants. More is required in the city than in the country. But taking the two together, we find the ratios pretty constant at about one dollar in specie to three, or a little less, of paper; and about fifteen per cent, or one in specie to six or seven of capital ; or ten per cent, in the country, and twenty in the city banks. The ratio of specie to loans and discounts may be changed by a change in either of the items — specie in the vault, or loans and discounts credited on the books. (i) When there is a large balance of debt against us in foreign countries, specie must be drawn from the banks and be exported in order to meet that indebtedness ; hence the necessity for so much more specie in proportion to circulation in commercial cities than in inland towns. (2) When there are prospects of large crops and zi6 POLITICAL ECONOMY. an active business, banks are tempted to lend freely^ and thus, if not actually to increase the amount of bills in circulation, to increase their liabilities in the form of loans and discounts credited on their books^ which may be drawn against, and which, therefore,, they must provide for, and which, as well as their bills, they must pa)*' on demand in specie. So that usually the ratio of specie to loans and discounts is much more important as determining- the possibility of specie payment, than that of specie to circulation. This ratio is found to be about seven or eight per cent, or one dollar in specie for twelve of indebtedness in the banks in our country, gener- ally : or rather, it was so in the days of specie pay- ments before the war. But it is greater in the seaport towns than in the interior ; that is, the loans and discounts cannot so far exceed the specie in the seaport towns as in the country. The bank report for the United States, Dec. 3 1 st 1874, gives the following facts. Total number of banks 2027. Capital, - _ _ . $495,802,481 Deposits (total), - - - 693,927,095 Loans and Discounts, - - 955>86i,397 Specie, _ _ . 22,436,761 Legal Tenders, - 82,751,791 Legal Tenders and Specie, - 105,188,552 Bank notes in circulation - - 322,043,937 MONEY AND BANKING. 2^; The Loans and Discounts are very nearly double their Capital, and nearly as large as their Capital and Deposits together; or to be exact, the Loans and Discounts are equal to their Capital and a little over sixty-six per cent, or about two-thirds of their De- posits. The total amount of Specie and Legal Tenders combined, was to their bills outstanding, as i to 3.26, or their circulation was more than three times the Legal Tenders and Specie which are to re- deem it. The Deposits were in excess of their Capital by about the rate of three dollars of Deposits to two of Capital. And the ratio of Specie and Legal Tenders to- gether, to the Capital, was about one to five, or the Specie and Legal Tenders were only about twenty- one per cent, of the Capital. Now, when for any cause the proper ratio be- tween either capital, or specie and discount, becomes too small, the banks, having discounted too much, are cramped, and if it comes to be very much less, the banks are obliged to suspend specie payment, simply for the reason that they cannot supply the amount of specie needed for the business that will be done with so large an amount of indebtedness standingf against them on their books. 278 POLITICAL ECONOMY, 22S. Limit to a bauISs 'Circulation." And this is really the hmit to circulation alsa^. namely : the ratio between the amount of coin that is needed for redemption of their bills and the amount of paper that is needed for the purposes of exchanges ; this ratio will vary with many circum- stances. (i) In times of insecurity and uncertainty, people are anxious to have aS' much of their means in specie as possible. Hence with the first alarm of war or other calamity^ a run upon the banks, and a large amount of specie is drawn out to be hoarded. (2) In times of large importations more specie is needed : since our foreign goods can be paid for — at least the excess of imports over exports — only in gold and silver ; hence we have an additional item in favor of domestic exchanges as contrasted with foreign. (3.) The prohibition of small bills. In many States the issue and circulation of bills of a less denomination than $5.00 has sometimes been pro- hibited. This will of course necessitate the keeping of a larger amount of specie in the banks to meet the demands of business. 22g. Hotv banks cause fluctuations in prices. The agency of banks in causing fluctuations in MONEY AND BANKING. 279 price is easily understood. When everything is favorable they discount largely, and that makes money plenty and prices high. But the moment they exceed what is actually needed for the business •of the country, they become straightened and are obliged to withhold discounts, and "call in their cir- culation," as the expression is ; this they must do in ■order to be in a condition to meet their liabilities. This "calling in" of their circulation makes money scarce : prices fall ; dealers lose ; many fail. It is sometimes thought and said that banks might relieve a "tight market" by further issues, or at least by forbearing to "call in." But we forget that they have already discounted until they are in danger. If, therefore, they should continue to dis- count, or keep out their bills, they would soon be unable to redeem them — they would fail, and then all their paper would become depreciated and worthless, and the country would be worse off than a merely "tight market" could make it 2 JO. ReUirji to specie payment after suspension. I have spoken of banking as being done by indi- viduals and corporations ; the effect will be the same if it be done by nations. Their paper will be at par when they can redeem it, as fast as it becomes due at par, either in gold and silver, or in bills on 28o . POLITICAL ECONOMY. specie-pa\-iiig bonds. But if the ratio of specie to debts be too small, they can return to specie pay- ments in either of two ways, and in one or the other of them only. (i) By reducing the paper in circulation. This- they can do by destroying it as it is paid in, and this they can do, of course, only when their income is in excess of their expenses. Otherwise the paper or something of the same kind,, must go out to pay the liabilities. (2) Or secondly, by holding on to the quantity of paper until the amount of specie increases by the growth of business to the normal ratio. This is a slow process ; but in a growing country it is a sure one. 2JI. Ratio of specie to circulation in this country. When our last war broke out, the amount of pa- per bills was about $225,000,000; it is now $725,- 000,000, or more than three times as much. The specie then was sixty millions ; the specie now- owned by the government, is not more, probably, than twice that amount, or about one hundred and twenty millions. The specie is about twice as much as then, the circulation three times as much. And whether the circulation be more than business wants require, or not, it is more by about thirty per cent. MONEY AND BANKING. 281 than the amount of gold on hand can keep up to the par value. And gold is, as we say, thirty per cent, premium, or $1.30. But more truly, paper is at about 75 per cent, its nominal value The fol- lowing table shows the amount of bills in circulation with the ratio of the one to the other, for sixteen years before the war : 1837 CIRCULATION $149,185,890 SPECIE $37,915,340 RATIO 3-97 I84I 107,290,214 34,813,958 3 08 1842 83.734.011 28,440,423 2 94 1843 58,563,608 33.515.806 I 74 1844 75,167,646 49,898,269 I 30 1845 89,608,711 44,241,242 2 02 1846 105,552,427 42,012,095 2 75 1847 105,519,766 35,132,516 3 00 1848 128,506,091 46,369,765 2 79 1849 114,743,415 43,619,368 2 56 1850 131,366,526 45,379.345 2 76 I85I 155,165,251 48,671,048 3 19 1854 204,689,207 59,410,253 3 61 1855 186,952,223 53,944,546 3 46 1856 195.747.950 59,314,063 J 30 1857 214,778,822 58,349.838 3 — Average $2.88 2^2. The ejfects of over -is sue. The lowest ratio was in 1844; it was then 1.30; 282 POLITICAL ECONOMY. in 1857 372, and in 1837 it was 3.97; and in both these years we had a suspension of specie payments by our banks, showing clearly that 3.72 is above the ratio of circulation to specie which the banks in our country can carry. The average for the sixteen years is 2.88, which may, perhaps, be assumed to be the safe one, or that at which the banks in our country are safe, and at which specie payments can be maintained. And about the same ratio is found to be safe and neces- sary in England, in France, and in other nations of Europe. It will be considered that this is the average for the whole country. Each locality has one of its own, and for itself In New York city the banks seldom, if ever, have so much circulation as specie, their loans and discounts consisting mostly of credits on their books. But in the country it is not uncommon for the ratio of circulation to specie to exceed ten to one. The ratio for the State of New York as a whole is about the same as that for the nation as given above, though a little higher. ^ It not only brings, in the end, and as a result want, hunger, cold, privation, with all the train of diseases, suffering and death which insuffi- cient food and clothing produce ; but it produces, long before such an extremity is reached, anxiety in view of it, with a transformation of self-interest, which is commendable, into selfishness, which hardens the heart against all considerations of humanity and generosity; nay, even against the natural affections that bind man to his own "flesh and blood," his wife and children ; with an immense relaxation of public and private morals, men rushing into crime and women into shame, until we have all the evils of which humanity is capable, concen- trated and accumulated in one centre. On the other hand, an increasing distributive wealth is one of the most favorable conditions for 304 POLITICAL ECONOMY. promotion of intelligence, morals and refinement that we know of. In fact, so important and control- ling- are these two influences that all other means to promote or retard morality are of but little avail without them. 2^g. Effects seen in large cities. Now what we thus contemplate in general and in the abstract is apt to occur in any large city, whither people are attracted by one influence or another in excess of the demand for the performance of any labor that is there to be found. Hence, while there may be a class who are growing richer, and while in fact the general distributive wealth of the city or the nation is increasing, we have a large portion for whom it is decreasing ; and the effect is the same, if not worse, upon them than if the decrease were general, and extended to all the inhabitants of the city or the nation alike. These people usually col- lect or are forced together in some special locality, and make a Five Points for any city, a sort of pan- demonium of accumulated brutality and beastliness. 2^0. Two theories of population. Two widely different theories are held as to the ratio that exists between the increase of population OVER-POPULATION. 305 and the increase of wealth in the world at large, and on a smaller scale in every civilized community. The one is known as the Malthusian theory, which teaches that after a certain stage, already reached in many countries, distributive wealth is a constantly decreasing quantity. The other is advocated by Mr. Carey and others in this country, and holds that the distributive wealth is a constantly increasing quantity in all civ- ilized countries. Facts in great abundance can be cited — in fact, they have been cited — in proof of both theories. But, as I have said in the Introduction, facts never prove anything without an assumption, which may, of course, be false, — a mere petitio principii, — and thus vitiate the whole argument. 2-^1. Reasons for Malthiis' s theory. The Malthusian theory of population is usually held with the Ricardo theory of rent, and the two together teach — (i) That population tends to increase in a geo- metrical ratio, or by the constant multiplication of the number of people of each age by a certain rate of increase. (2) That wealth increases, at best, only in an arithmetical proportion, and this for two reasons ; 20 3o6 POLITICAL ECONOMY. (a) People, as he holds, always begin to cultivate the best and most productive soils first ; so that at each successive stage and with each succeeding generation in a nation's history, they will be taking into culture lands of inferior productive value, and hence the average productiveness of the soil actually under cultivation will be a decreasing one. (b) That the cultivation of the soil tends to wear it out, so that the same soil becomes less and less productive as time rolls on ; and that, in conse- quence, in each succeeding age the land will produce less than in any preceding age. Taking these two conditions together, we may represent the distributive wealth of successive ages by the quotient of the corresponding terms in two series, the one geometrical, and the other arithmet- ical, the terms in the geometrical series being always a divisor ; thus, 1234567 I 2 4 8 16 32 64 2^2. Reasons for Carey's theory. Mr. Carey, on the other hand, holds, (i) That cultivation always begins with the poorer if not the poorest lands, on hillsides and hill- tops, where the forests are light and the soil thin ; while the most productive soils are on the lowlands V VER-POPULA TION. 307 — too heavily timbered and too wet for the cultiva- tion of the first settlers — and hence, the average productiveness is an increasing one, in consequence of the fact that the portion taken into cultivation by each succeeding generation is better than that of the preceding. (2) That culivation itself, so far from wearing out the soil, tends, if properly conducted, to deepen and enrich it ; so that instead of bearing less, it becomes more productive with successive genera- tions of cultivators. Hence, in considering the production of wealth as affected or limited by land, we have three varia- bles, which may vary independently of each other. (1) The amount of land actually under cultiva- tion. This will, of course, be greater when the inhab- itants of the earth number millions, than it can be when they are but a few hundred. (2) The average entire productiveness of the soil actually under cultivation. Ricardo holds, as we have seen, that it would be less when the earth, or any large portion of it, is pretty well occupied, than when there are but a inw people, and that, therefore, the average native pro- ductiveness of the soil actually under culture de- creases with the increase of population ; so that a day's work, on the average, will produce less and SoS POLITICAL ECONOMY. less. Carey holds the opposite view as already stated. (3) The acquired productiveness. Ricardo holds that the land becomes vi^orn out,, and so the native productiveness becomes less and less with each advancing generation. Carey holds^ that with proper culture each acre may become more and more productive, and hence the acquired productiveness is an increasing one ; so that a day's labor will produce more and more. 2§j, How far satisfactory . There can be no doubt that Carey is right in the main, in the two last of these propositions. Both authors are agreed in regard to the first. It is a fact that the first settlers in any country do not generally begin in the lowlands, which with proper cultivation will produce the largest crops. And it is undoubtedly true, and I presume both Malthus and Ricardo would admit it, if they were now living, that cultivation need not exhaust the soil, but on the contrary, if we will return to it in the form of manure all that we take from it, or its equivalent, it will grow more and more productive with culti- vation. But I cannot attribute to the premises of Mr. Carey the influence he claims for them in disproof of the Ricardo-Malthusian doctrine. OVER-POPULATION. 309 (i) The quantity of land that can possibly be brought under cultivation is limited by geograph- ical and astronomical considerations that man cannot change. It is manifest that the soil on which any great city, or in fact any village of considerable size, stands, could not be made to produce food enough to sustain the people that now live upon it Suppose now under the law of increase of popu- lation already stated, population should become the world over as great to the square mile as in our cities and villages, or even approaching it, there could be no increase of the means of living equal to the increase of population. (2) The productiveness of any soil is limited. Nobody supposes th-it an acre of ground, for ex- ample, could be made to produce an unlimited quantity of wheat. Hundreds and thousands of bushels to the acre is beyond human expectations — beyond possibility. 2^4. The rate of increase of production. Hence, the first series of terms given above, that which represents the increase of productiveness of the soil, and constitutes the successive numerators in the preceding paragraph, though of the nature of an arithmetical series, cannot be regarded as hav- ing any constant rate of increase or common differ- 3IO POLITICAL ECONOMY. ence. At times, doubtless, the series will increase more rapidly than by a common difiference of one, and at others, by a difference less than one, until',, when all the land shall have been brought under cultivation, and the fertility of the soil shall have been increased up to the highest point, to which skill and labor can carry it, there can be no common difference, no farther increase at all,, whatever may be the state of the population, whether increasing or decreasing. And so, too, the "difference," or rate of increase in certain cases, may become a minus quantity, and give in succeeding quantities a smaller quantity of the products of labor with which to supply human wants. Doubtless such a thing, though possible, will be rare and most demoralizing in its influence, wherever and whenever it may occur. ^55. The rate of increase of population. Certainly the rate of increase in human popula- tion is of the nature of a geometrical ratio. Two parents, for example, may have four children, and they may, each pair of them, become parents, with four children in each family, and so on ; and thus we have a geometrical series, with a ratio of two to indicate the rate of increase of population. Of course this will not be the exact number in all cases. But it indicates the law of the series. O VER-POPULA TION. 3 1 1 2^6, Limits to the rate of iticrease of population. But to the operation of this law there are two limits, that the advocates of the Malthusian theory seem not to have taken into account ; both of them limiting, after a certain stage in the progress of the race, the rate of increase, totally irrespective of any change in the distributive wealth. (i) Human beings, like every thing else in the animal, and even in the vegetable world, become generally less productive as they rise in the scale of culture. We are all familiar with the fact that roses and others of our most highly cultivated flowers will produce no germinating seed ; some- times they have no seed at all. The higher ranks in any civilized society, if we take wealth and cultivation as the standard, seldom produce offspring enough to keep their numbers, as a class, good. Most of the great men of the world have had no children ; very few have had descend- ants in any direct Hne for more than three or four generations. (2) As population becomes dense large cities arise and increase in number, and in the number of their citizens. But they are great consumers of human life. I doubt if in cities with thirty thousand inhabit- ants, there are, on an average, more persons born 312 POLITICAL ECONOMY. than die annually within their limits. In larger cities the number of deaths almost invariably ex- ceeds the number of births. In New York it is about three to one. For some years past there have been in round numbers, births 14,000, deaths 21,000. And this certainly not because there is not enough to live upon : not because New York State is not increasing in distributive wealth. Dense aggregations of people, such as cities and armies, furnish an extended field for the operation of the causes tending to destroy human life. The barrack and the camp are great nurseries of vice and disease, and far more destructive to life than the actual battle field, while the influx of fresh blood into cities and towns unprotected by sanitary precautions affords them the only refuge from depopulation and decay. The tendency of population is to centralization. Great cities and large towns thus become pestif- erous centres, absorbing the vigor and energy of the country and increasing at its expense. The causes tending to produce disease and death are more fatal and prevalent among a dense than among a scattered population. In England, for example, from every class of diseases except two, the deaths were more numerous in the cities and larger towns than in the rural districts. OVER-POPULATION. 313 For the diseases called zymotic, and believed to originate from over-crowding and a general sanitary- condition of the people, the deaths were twice as numerous in the cities as in the country, while for the whole number of diseases the deaths were forty per cent, more among the civic than among the rural population. Of the whole ninety-five causes of death specified in the reports of the Registrar- General, only fourteen — and these among the least destructive — were more prevalent in the country than in the cities of Eng- land. The reports of the Registrar- General give the ra- tio of deaths, in each of the six hundred and twenty- three registration districts, to the density of popula- tion, for twenty years, and show that the death-rate varies directly as the density and inversely as the advance of sanitary civilization. In the most crowded localities, with a population of two hundred and fifty to the acre, the death-rate was one in eighteen ; while in the country, with from twenty to thirty-eight acres to the individual, the deaths were only one in sixty-two. As another proof that the average life of man is shorter, his vitality lower, and his physical powers less fully and perfectly developed and less vigorously sustained in the city than in the country, I cite the fact that of the recruits enlisted for the British and 314 POLITICAL ECONOMY. French armies who fail to meet the requirements of health, strength, constitution and stature, a much greater proportion of them are from the cities than from the rural districts. ^57. Statistics bearing on this point. I find the following statistics in the Philosophical Transactions, Vol. VII, pp. 10 and 214 of the Abridgment relating to the cities on the continent of Europe, chiefly German ; I could doubtless find more recent facts on the same subject, but these are sufficient, I think, to justify me in the inference I have made. CITIES. BIRTHS. DEATHS PER YEAR. Breslau, 1295 1482 Vienna, 4104 6490 (A. D. 1720) Dresden, 1396 1850 Leipsic, 760 1300 (A. D. 1719) Ratisbon, 250 220 Nuremburg, 1084 1063 Copenhagen, 2630 2247 Dantzic, Weimar, 1833 100 1435 183 Berlin, 2701 2499 Lobau, 226 171 Freyburg, 262 321 Erfurt, 666 448 Augsburg, I9y. ,347,481 394,837 Totals, 370,030 415,806 VER-POPULA TION. 3 1 5 or a rate of births to deaths nearly six to seven. Pt will also be noticed that, with important exceptions, the excess of births to deaths is in the smaller towns. Doubtless improvements in sanitary regulations will change the ratios for the better. But still I think that the general principle holds good, that there is a tendency to increase the death-rate above the birth-rate in large towns, with densely crowded population, scarcity of food, insufficient cleanliness, foul air, and still fouler habits and morals. 2^8. Difference between civilized and savage society in this respect. We have, then, two causes that influence the rate of increase of population, bearing directly upon the ratio given on a preceding page, namely : (i) With higher culture, the births among the better class will be fewer, and (2) In the lower classes the deaths will be greater in proportion to numbers. Now there can be no doubt that the rate of in- crease is of the nature of a geometrical ratio, as expressed by the successive denominators given above ; and yet, the ratio itself is not constant. It may be true for several generations in some states of society and some conditions of human life. But 3i6 POLITICAL ECONOMY. in others it will, for the two causes just named, be less, so that it may become unity, with, of course, a population stationary. And with war, pestilence and famine, and epidemic diseases, it may become a fraction ; in which case the series is a decreasing one, and we have a state of things most unfortunate for human morals as well as for the physical well- being. And it is worthy of special note, that at present and in this stage of human history both causes co- operate infertility of the highly cultivated and fre- quent deaths among the vicious, debased, and pov- erty-stricken population of our large towns. In a savage state, only the latter cause would operate to any considerable extent. But as we pass to a higher civilization, and approach the last stages of human existence, the opportunity for this cause will, as I think, disappear and the other come into fuller oper- ation, and control the conditions of society and the destinies of man. And thus we shall have a state in which there will be and can be no over-popula- tion, and that too without death-rates increased by starvation, or by any other cause or influence than such as men and women choose to impose on them- selves, irrespective of any question as to the ways and means of raising and providing for the children that may happen to be born to them. OVER-POPULATION. 317 2^6. Inference from the foregoing. Taking then the two elements, (i) rate of increase of production, and (2) rate of increase of population, into consideration together, and considering the con- trolling causes that influence the nature of the rates, we find that there must come a time when the pro- ductions of the soil and the means of human sub- sistence shall have reached its highest limit, and can go no further ; and a time, also, when the ratio of increase to the population will be reduced to unity ; and then we shall have no further increase in the total or aggregate population of the earth. From the nature of the case, the two conditions, though to some extent independent of each other, are not, nevertheless, so independent but that they must occur at about the same time. 260. Reference to the present condition of civilized natio7is. Another general fact will be useful in confirming our position. In all the nations of Europe and in America, too, for that matter, there has been, indeed within the last three hundred years, a great increase in the density of the population. But there can be no doubt that there has been a s^reater increase in both 3i8 POLITICAL ECONOMY. the aggregate and the distributive wealth, also, from which it is evident that the aggregate wealth has increased faster than the population. This might not be inferred, or admitted even, if we were to look only at the conditions of the poorer classes alone. But if we look into the mansions of the rich and consider their style of living, the amount of the products of labor they consume in the family, their houses and their tables, their wardrobes and their stables, and compare these items of expense with what their ancestors, some three or four hun- dred years ago, were accustomed to, I think we shall find reason to accept the statement that both the aggregate and distributive wealth have greatly increased. 261. The rate of interest indicates the rate of increase of wealth. But looking at the rate of interest and the rate of increase of population as independent facts, we deduce a conclusion that is both illustrative and confirmatory of the general doctrine just an- nounced. The rate of interest indicates the rate of increase in capital : that is, it indicates the rate of increase in distributive wealth, that would result if all the wealth were used as capital — the rate of increase therefore, that is always possible for a nation. O VER-POPULA TION. 3 1 9 Thus, suppose a man with five thousand dollars capital and employing two men, can make a certain net amount of profit in a year. Now suppose that with one thousand dollars more of capital he could make one hundred dollars more after paying for whatever of additional cost there may be in carry- ing on the business, arising from this increase in his capital. It is manifest that he will hire that one thousand dollars, if he can get it, for a rate of inter- est that is less than ten per cent., or one hundred dollars on a thousand ; that is, he will pay nearly all he can make more, in consequence of the use of the borrowed money, for the use of that money. But of course he can make that amount only because a thousand dollars capital can be made to produce that additional amount of value. Hence the rate of interest is an indication of the increment in distrib- utive wealth, or the addition that is made to it year by year. If this be great, interest will be high ; if small, the rate of interest will be low. 262. This compared zvith the rate of increase of population. If now we turn to some of the leading nations of the earth, we find that the rate of increase in popu- lation per year, is about as follows ; 320 POLITICAL ECONOMY. United States, _ - _ 3.00 per cent. England, - - - - 1.80 Austria, - - - - 1.30 Prussia, - - - - 1.40 Netherlands, - - - 1.30 Naples, - - - - .83 France, - - - - .60 The list might be extended so as to include all the nations of the civilized world. But that is un- necessary. Now the rate of increase of population is not probably in any one of these cases, or in any other that can be cited, more than one-half so great as the rate of interest, even when divested of all increments on account of risk, uncertainty of payment, etc.. In the United States, at the time referred to above, the average rate of interest was more than five per cent. In England it was certainly not less than three per cent. In the Netherlands it was more than two per cent., and so for the rest. In all cases the rate of interest is more than that of increase of popula- tion, showing conclusively that up to this time wealth is increasing, even in our richest and most densely populated countries, much faster than the population among whom it should be distributed. 26 J. Inference from the facts. It must be manifest, therefore, that any increase to the population must give an increase to the rate VER-POPULA TION. 3 2 1 at which wealth will be increased until we have the operation of this arrested by one or the other of the following facts. (i) No more land to be taken into cultivation. (2) No possibility of increasing the productive- jiess of that which is under cultivation. (3) No new article, which having been hitherto useless, may be utilized. (4) No discovery of a new use for an article, which has been already in use, that may increase its intrinsic value or power of satisfying human wants. (5) No possibility of greater economy in con- sumption, so that what we use will be made "to go further" as the expression is. (6) No further reduction of the "waste" which is in some measure inseparable from all forms and con- ditions of human life. Short of these limits, the aggregate wealth may increase with the increase of population, and for reasons already given, it must increase more rapidly than population up to a point very near to those limits. It must be understood moreover, that the increase of wealth will not be arrested by the reaching of any one, or in fact, any part of them alone ; they must all be reached before there will be a stop to the increase of the aggregate wealth of the world. •21 322 POLITICAL ECONOMY. 26^. A turning point in the law. But it is certainly possible, and in fact highly probable, that long before this time the Hroit to the- increase of the distributive wealth wilt have been reached, that is, the point at which no more can be produced during th-e year by the labor of mankind than will be consumed by them during a similar period. The history of the world furnishes examples of decreasing wealth and population, as well as of the reverse. The plains of Mesopotamia, "'the marshes"' as they are called, about Rome, are examples. In all these cases the decrease of population caused an abandonment of the most fertile land, simply be- cause they required more labor for their cultivation than the decreasing population could give. Not- withstanding these lands yielded when properly cultivated more per cent, and more for each day's work bestowed on them, they were the first to be abandoned, as they were the last to be brought into cultivation. With a decrease in wealth and population, comes also an abandonment of the precautions taken to retain the richest or marsh lands for agricultural purposes. Noxious malaria is thus permitted to in- vade the salubrious districts ; it invariably advances upon the decay, and retreats before the growth HOPES AND PROSPECTS. 323 of civilization. The Pontine marshes have sickened the district of Volci and the Eternal City for many an age, the noxious malaria of the Maremma has been long familiar, and to that agency alone do the people attribute their inability to overcome the effects of the pestilential invasions of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Hence it seems manifest that from the first settle- ment of a country, or the first step in the process of emerging from savagery, wealth will increase more rapidly than population, and thus give a con- stantly increasing distributive wealth. But there is a point, as we have seen, at which this ratio of the two increments must cease, I have indicated that point as the concurrence of five con- tingencies, but practically they will all come to one, namely : the time when there is no more uncul- tivated land to be brought under culture as a means of production. 26^. Sig?is of the approach to it. Of the approach of this period there will be several signs, and beyond it there will be certain consequences which it may be well theoretically to consider. The first sign is this, interest on money, or what is the same thing, rent for capital will be reduced to a minimum, and most likely to nothing. 324 POLITICAL ECONOMY. I refer here only to the facts proved to be the re- sult of an inevitable law, that interest decreases as capital, or distributive wealth increases in quantity or amount. And it may be well to remark that capital is always distributive wealthy and distributive wealth is capital ; this results from the fact that every man uses up his annual income in some zaaj/. Even if he invests it in bonds or stocks, it becomes capital for the support of labor. Railroad stock, for ex- ample, is but the representative receipt for money paid towards the labor of building and equipping the road, or of obtaining the right of way, etc., as prehminary conditions to its construction. National stocks form no exception. They represent Jiozv, largely, work that was done in the late war as a means of preservation to the nation itself, and thus the money invested in them is, or has been devoted to the support of labor. But to return to the fact. It is obvious, at first sight, that the richer the country, the lower the rate of interest. In all new countries it is very high, twelve and fifteen per cent. In New England it is six per cent. ; in New York seven ; in England four or below ; in Holland and Belgium still lower. 266. The effect of reaching it. Under this law the time must come when interest HOPES AND PROSPECTS. 325 and rents will be so low that nobody can live on them alone, without productive labor and exertion of his own. For, before we reach that limit, all such institutions as primogeniture, entail, jointure, etc., by which large estates are locked up and kept together, in and for the use of a single privileged family, as in England, must have been swept away by other influences than those that mere Political Economy takes note of Hence at and before this period in the world's history, accumulated wealth as a means of support, must be drawn upon like the oleagenous matter in the system in the animal economy when disease has impaired the processes of digestion and nutrition. All will of necessity become laborers, and all will be gradually approaching that condition, in which all will be nearly equal ; for all will be reduced, each one to that which he can do, even with his own hands and by his own skill ; and the utmost produc- tion of all labor combined can do no more than to produce what is needed from year to year for con- sumption. 26y. Changes in social and private habits. First in the order, all mere waste will be stopped ; we must give up tobacco and whiskey ; and the lux- uries, as they are called, will be dispensed with. 326 POLITICAL ECONOMY. And I have no doubt we shall have an increase of health and longevity, as well as a great improve- ment in public and private morals, with this change. And doubtless some of those things which are called " conveniences," will be the next to go, and with them, or with what will then be considered as belonging to and constituting this class — there will probably be no loss to the cause of health and good morals. And at this period, I have no doubt that in obe- dience to laws I have already stated, there will be such a modification of the rate of increase of popu- lation, that there will be little if any farther increase at all ; and the births,, without any restraint imposed by the state or other agency than the voluntary choice of the people themselves, will not be more numerous than the deaths that will occur without violence and in the ordinary course of nature. 268. Fears of a nablesse of wealth. But it has been predicted, in view of the vast power which wealth, as acquired capital gives to the man who possesses it, that there is a prospect that those who have it will acquire by the natural oper- ation of the laws of Political Economy, at a con- stantly increasing rate, until nearly all the wealth is owned by these business men, and managed by HOPES AND PROSPECTS. 327 them so that we shall come to have a noblesse of wealth, in the near future as we have had a noblesse of political power in the past ages of mankind. Such persons argue that as capital in the shape of tools, machinery, etc., gives to the laborer increased capacity to produce commodities, ther-e is a tendency towards greater diversity in the amount of wealth that will be possessed by the individual, arising from the fact, that he that has the most capital to work with, can make money the fastest. Now this is to some extent true. The introduc- tion of machinery, with a consequent division of la- bor in any kind of manufacturing, will drive all the small manufacturers, who labor without machinery, out of business, and close their shops. The same is true to some extent on our farms : the man with a large farm can afford to buy and use ■expensive labor-saving implements, which his poorer neighbor, with but a few acres, cannot afford to buy. Hence, in all our countries that have been settled fifty years or more, and that are pretty thickly settled, the owners of small farms are selling out, and their lands are being absorbed into larger estates. And, in the same way, small manufactories are being merged into larger ones. 26^. Reasons why there can be 7ione. But 'there is a limit to this increasing disparity in the distribution of wealth. 32S . POLITICAL ECONOMY. There is always a limit to the amount of capital which any one man can use with increasing rate of profit. It will be understood that I am speaking only of the legitimate means of acquiring wealth — agricult- ure, manufactures and trade ; what I have said may not be true of speculation. In that way of getting wealth, the larger one's capital the greater may be the extent to which it will enable him to make combinations, buy up stocks, force "comers," and the various other operations known to the craft. But this is exceptional and abnormal. Even now it meets the disapprobation of the moral sense of mankind, and there can be no doubt, I think, that means will be found in the progress of civilization to slough off this diseased tissue and get rid of this perpetual ulcer on the body politic. This kind of "business" is greatest and most sought for, when the rate of interest is high, the country unsettled, and prices and values are fluctu- ating. It is merely a temptation to men who are not disposed to do anything to increase the actual wealth of the community, to put in their hands and clutch all they can get hold of, of the products of other men's labor : they buy and sell for none of the legitimate purposes of trade ; they do not wait for the natural rise and fall in prices, though ready to take advantage of them ; they buy to f(5rce up HOPES AND PROSPECTS. 329 the market, or they sell to "bear" it down ; and are really but little better entitled to the gratitude of mankind than the incendiary who sets fire to a town only for the chance of plunder, which the conflagra- tion, that his criminal act has produced, affords him. 2yo. Unity of executive necessary. Any kind of business that deserves the name of business, or is in any way useful to mankind, re- quires, in order to the highest rate of profit, to be carried on as a unity, and must be supervised and managed by some one mind. Now when in any case the business of any es- tablishment or firm gets to be so large, that no one man can give to it, and to all its parts the maximum of skill and attention, some man with the same amount of skill and industry, and less capital or bus- ness to manage, will make money faster than he does, that is at a faster rate, though perhaps not so much in gross amount per year. Again, much will depend upon locality, especially in matters of exchange. A merchant in New York needs more capital than he could well manage in a country village. This is notably true of banks. In the country the capital seldom goes beyond one or two hundred thousand dollars ; in the city it 330 POLITICAL ECONOMY. sometimes reaches fifteen or twenty millions. It takes but little if any more time and care to make entries and look after accounts that amount to thousands of dollars than those that count by tens or hundreds. 2^1. Effects of increasing intelligence. But a most important limitation is to be found in the intelligence of the people themselves. In a country of savages alone, ignorant and unskilled, there is no doubt that one man could produce from any large tract of land more as owner and control- ling mind than they would produce if left to them- selves, or could produce if they were each one of them to direct his own efforts in his lack of skill. But convert these mere ignorant operatives into intelligent farmers, each as capable of managing a farm as the one supposed capitalist, and the tract of land would require to be subdivided into much smaller farms, in order that we might get the bene- fits of each man's skill or realize the greatest rate of profit on the capital employed in its cultivation. We find, then, that in the increase of the number of educated laborers there is a limit to the tendency to accumulate the wealth of a nation in the hands of a few, and that a constantly decreasing portion of the population, and hence a corresponding ten- HOPES AND PROSPECTS. 331 dency towards an equality in the distributive wealth. But the great fact is, that with any increase in the intelligence of the people there will be a greater utilization of the forces of nature; they will be compelled to do more and more of our work for us. Human labor will be a constantly decreasing portion of that which makes up the intrinsic value of the articles we have occasion to use, and the exchange- able value we have to pay for in purchasing them. Hence they will be cheaper and evermore becoming cheaper, and thus more and more within the reach of the mere laborer, increasing not only his comfort and means of enjoyment, but also his power to accumulate and become a capitalist, and thus reap the profits due to the capital employed, as well' as receive the wages of the labor performed. Hence to every intelligent and competent man the way is opened to the possession and ownership of as much capital as he can use with a maximum rate of profit, or as is necessary to his happiness and welfare. 2^2. Fears of a violent assumptioti of wealth by the few. Again, there are those who predict that as we ap- proach the time when the earth is so full that there is a prospect of want, the powerful and cunning few will get the wealth into their hands by some violent 332 POLITICAL ECONOMY. means, assume all political power and control, and devolve all the evils of the want and destitution upon the laborers, so that they will be only the worse off, the more numerous they are. There is much in the present condition of the wealthiest, and most densely populated nations of the old world, as well as in the history of the past, to give plausibility, if not probability, to this view. But I have been speaking of the time when the "whole world" shall have become so full, as to bring about these results everywhere, rather than of the case as it may occur in any particular nation. In this age, emigration has come in to play a most important part. It not only carries off the surplus population ; but the surplus of capital also goes abroad, seeking investment where it can find offers of greater returns, than can be expected at home. For these two reasons, the exportation of labor, and the transfer of capital, we do not see in any of the nations of Europe, all the legitimate effects of the growing density of their population. Rents are not so low, and the condition of the laborers is not so bad, as it would have been, had not this means of relief been extensively in operation. zyj. The poverty of the many no fault of nature. But why, one very naturally asks, will not all HOPES AND PROSPECTS. 333 these evils come upon us in their most aggravated and most unmitigated forms when the earth itself gets so full that there will be no place for emigration to transfer, either wealth seeking new investments, or laborers in search of employment and the means of sustenance ? To this question I answer that the wealth of the few or poverty of the many is no fault of nature, or of the Author of nature. It is rather the fault of man. No nation of any con- siderable size has ever yet had so many people that with equal laws, fair distribution, and proper frugal- ity, it could not abundantly support them all. And for reasons already assigned, I think we may safely affirm that no such phenomenon will ever occur. If now we look into the nations where there has been the greatest complaint of "over-population," we shall find causes at work, quite other than the laws of nature, that are sufficient to account for what has occurred. We not only find a large mon- eyed class, but we find them in possession of the political power as well. Selfishness there does not enable them to grasp all they want, notwithstanding the poverty the destitution, and the starvation of the masses. But this cannot always continue : there is one country now, where it cannot possibly occur. Give us a country in which the people are comparatively intelligent, and have been accus- tomed to the possession and exercise of political 334 POLITICAL ECONOMY. rights; to choose their own officers, and through them to make and execute their own laws ; and any approach to the Hmit where population overtakes the power of the earth to support it, will show itself in the gradual approach towards an equality of wealth ; leaving behind an inequality only as great as that which exists in the productive value of each man's ability to create wealth. zy^. Econo7mc effects of universal suffrage. I look upon the formation of the American Re- public, now that time and the experience of a century have proved it a success, as one of the greatest epochs in history. I know of only one that I would reckon its equal, and that is the introduction of Christianity. The political equality which was here established, was the great and characteristic feature of the new era for humanity. Here the people are voters, and the people are laborers. Hence the laborers do the voting, they get accustomed to re- spect and to exercise their rights, they will see that their rights are guarded and enforced ; and among them, as the most sacred of all, the right of the la- borer to his hire, and the right of every man to the wealth he lawfully acquires. It is evident, I think, from the condition of things at present, that this relation of the people, one to HOPES AND PROSPECTS. 335 another, is approaching in all the nations of the old world. Privileged classes must go to the unrelent- ing receptacle of the past, and long before the earth will have become so full that she can sustain no more, and the ratio of the increase of population will have become unity, universal suffrage will have become universal in fact, as well as in name. And then no grasping few, however selfish and well dis- posed to do so, can secure and hold to themselves an abundance, while the many are starving or wait- ing in undesired idleness, kept from creating as well as earning for themselves a living. There will be no class trained to servility, and accustomed to the abnegation of their rights, to submit to such tyranny. The sacred awe for superiors will have passed away, or cease to exist in any such sense as to allow them to monopolize the means of subsistence and enjoy- ment. Hence the power to acquire and hold the wealth by the few will have passed away ; they cannot do it by physical force — they will be too few in num- bers for that. They cannot do it by moral means, or rather the immoral means of superstitious vene- ration for superiority of rank ; for the people are too much enlightened and too irreverent for that. They cannot do it by any voluntary consent of the people ; for, however it may happen that here and there one may consent to starve that others dearer 336 POLITICAL ECONOMY. than himself may eat and hve, this can never be the case with the masses ; and the masses will see no occasion for their sacrificing themselves for others who, so far as they can or will see, are no better than themselves. 275. Increasing regard for the principles of right. And I have no doubt that as the period we are contemplating approaches, there will be an increas- ing regard for the moral principles, which now and ever lie at the foundation of all society, of all government, and of all law. I have already inti- mated my belief that it was man's entering upon that stage towards civilization, where labor becomes a necessity, which, if it did not originate, did cer- tainly give a most important impulse to the develop- ment of man's moral nature. From that time to this, there has been, indeed, even in the midst of civilization — to say nothing of what has occurred among savage and barbarous nations outside of it — two diverse and opposite tendencies of the influences at work, according, as I think, to the diversity in the natural constitutions of those upon whom the in- fluences have been operating. But the tendency has been, on the whole, upwards and for the better. And that must be so hereafter. The means of liv- ing becoming scarce in proportion to the population HOPES AND PROSPECTS. 337 that want them, and there being no privileged classes who may, and no selfish class who can, take to themselves the lion's share, each one of the better disposed will become more jealous of the rights of property, especially the rights of the laborer to his share, as contrasted with that of the capitalist. Hence, clearer notions of right and the passing away of many of the principles of "the law mer- chant" which now pass current, and are accepted by everybody, must ensue. 2^6. Improvement in the administration of justice. Nor will it be merely a change in the notions and views of the rights of property ; there can hardly fail to be greater certainty of detection, and greater severity of punishment for any unlawful means of getting property. And some of the measures that are now allowed or winked at, will then be regarded as unjust and consequently made unlawful. But at present, John Jacob Astor may be worth his forty or fifty millions of dollars, and be honored and respected by every body, and as completely protected by the laws of the state and all the force of the general government, if need be, as the poor man in the enjoyment of his daily wages. Perhaps a few lazy, vicious, or improvident spendthrifts may curse him for their poverty. A few unfortunate 22 338 POLITICAL ECONOMY. widows and invalids, who are poor and destitute from no cause of their own, may, with good reason perhaps, feel that he ought to be a little more liberal of his abundance in supply of their necessitieSi But the great mass of the people regard him with admiration and envy rather; everybody is glad there are such men. He is an example that shows what others may become. His very existence shows that a man may be worth his millions and nobody the worse for it, but rather the better. It shows that such men may not only exist, but that they may each of them be regarded as a public blessing, a philanthropist, a benefactor of his race. And so doubtless, such men are, in the present stage of the world's history. But let the time come when all that the combined industry of the world can do,, is to produce as much as the inhabitants of the world will need to meet their annual consumption,, and the state of things will be greatly changed. Not all the armies and navies in the world could protect a man in the ownership of so much wealth, for there could nobody be found that could be com- pelled or hired to serve in an army or a navy that is to be used for such a purpose. So long as there does not appear to be any limit to the wealth that may be had, so that one man, by getting rich ever so fast, does not seem to be any hindrance to others getting rich as fast as they please. HOPES AND PROSPECTS. 339 but is rather an example and an encouragement to them, they are not likely to look very carefully at the means by which he acquires his property. They care but little for that so long as there are no violent outrages upon the property of others, as larceny, etc. But when the time comes that everybody sees that A by getting rich very fast, is in consequence of the limitation of the amount of wealth, by just so much a hindrance and an obstacle in the way of B and C and all their neighbors and fellow countrymen, to the end of the alphabet, getting rich at all, or even getting a hving, they will become exceedingly jeal- ous and watchful, and see that by no means, and under no pretence of law or right, shall anybody get anything more than a fair compensation for the work he actually performs in some department of useful industry. Long before that time arrives however, men will become jealous of the means by which large fortunes are gained. Stricter notions of honesty and more vigorous means of enforcing them will prevail, with great benefit to the public, as well as the private morals of mankind. And thus while there will doubtless be individual instances of persons or of small neighborhoods in which the influences that tend to advance civilization, appear to exert a de- moralizing effect ; making men and women worse; proving itself, as in fact, something better than even 340 POLITICAL ECONOMY. civilization has been declared to be — "a savour of death unto death " unto some ; yet, on the whole, the increasing diversity of the population must have for the race at large, a tendency upwards, towards a higher moral as well as a higher intellectual level ; the very "struggle for life and the survival of the fittest," will work in this direction, and may be re- garded as good for this result. When starvation is staring men in the face, they will not be so indifferent as now, either to the crimes that take from them the means of living, or to the virtues that multiply that means and tend to secure its more equal distri- bution. zyy. Approach towards social equality. And I think, too, that this equality of pecuniary condition, or rather, the near approach to it — far equality is a limit which it can never reach — will tend to improve men and society, in other ways than the one I have more especially spoken of It will, I think, make men all alike in one respect. Even if they are not equal, they will all be obliged to work and earn a living. Hence, one of the greatest causes of the rivalries and jealousies, that have hitherto done so much to harden the hearts, and embitter the lives of mankind, will be done away, and replaced as we think, by a sympathy and fellow-feeling, that HOPES AND PROSPECTS. 341 is the parent and fruitful source of most of the do- mestic and social virtues, and without which, they cannot exist. "The love of money" is the root of •evil only when it becomes the love of that portion, or amount of money, that may minister to vice, or enable one to lift himself above the common wants, and the common sympathies of his fellow-men, into that aristocratic and self-indulgent isolation, where some measure of indifference becomes indispensable to the maintenance of the "position," in which their money has placed them. 2^8. No over -population possible. Hence, instead of expecting any " over-popula- tion," in the sense in which the words are ordinarily used by Political Economists, I regard the thing as impossible. On the contrary, I look upon the in- creasing density of population in the world, as one of the indispensable conditions of an advancing civilization, and as one of the most efficient means towards a greater freedom and equality, a higher morality, and a more enlightened humanity, than the world has ever yet seen. But I expect nothing, however, from Political Economy, without Christianity. I believe in "origi- nal sin," an inherited depravity working inwardly to produce tendencies to evil which "remaineth even 342 POLITICAL ECONOMY. in them that are regenerate," and which no mere education in the principles of science, no combina- tion or force of external circumstances and condi- tions, can wholly eradicate ; and certainly this will always produce evil men and evil deeds, unless, in- deed, in some far off future, and some widely differ- ent circumstances of our race, the cleansing influ- ences of the in-working Holy Spirit of God shall effect a renovation in the race at large, like that which has actually been wrought in rare instances in men from the days when first the Holy Ghost was poured on the believing few on that early Pen- tecost in the first century. But we shall have, as I believe, in the future, con- straint and pressure of outward circumstances con- spiring with inward conditions and the influences of the Holy Spirit acting through the doctrines and institutions of Christianity, to bring in an ideal state of humanity, a golden age of perfected manhood. Then there will be none, as I think, so rich that they will not need to work, and none who will work, so poor that they will need be ignorant, vicious, or vile. APPENDIX. An Essay on '•'■the Relations of Labor and Capital froin a Christian point of View" — Read before the First Amer- ican Church Congress, New York, October 7, 1874, by the Rev. W. D. Wilson, D. D,, LL. D., of the Cornell University. [Reprinted from the Proceedings.] The relation of labor to capital is one of the great problems of the age — of all ages. In the lowest stages of human society, capital does not exist The labor, such as it is, is performed by each one, man and woman alike, for himself or for herself But soon, at a stage above, this ceases. The strongest party shirk the work, devolving it on the women, and take to themselves the more lordly occupations of war and hunting. At the next stage we find the institution of slavery, and a ser- vile class, without rights, without so much as the owner- ship of themselves, doomed to do the work, while the masters live at ease, and enjoy themselves on the pro- ceeds of the labor. But as society advances, slavery is found to be both inhuman and uneconomical, and antislavery sentiment 344 APPENDIX, arises. But, without this, it is much preferable in many respects that the master should cease to be a master and man-owner, and become only the capitalist, dealing with those who do the work, not as slaves, but rather as equals, laborers employed by contract and consent. And we have now society divided into capitalists and laborers — both free, both equal before the law — but very une- qual in respect to culture, social position, and the means and opportunities for enjoyment. And even this state of society, which is usually regarded as civilization, as. the two preceding stages have been respectively regarded as savagery and barbarism, tends and looks forward to another in which all shall be capitalists, and all be labor- ers; every man shall work for the living he has, and every one shall own the capital he needs wherewith to do his work ; and culture will be universal, if not equal. Means and leisure for all reasonable enjoyment will be within the reach of all; and moral purity, a high state of integrity, and a benevolent regard by all persons for the welfare of all others will be the prevailing sentiment. Shall we call this the Christian stage — the millennium — the divine ideal fully realized ? . Doubtless our blessed Lord saw these great problems, as he saw all others that have oppressed and embarrassed humanity. But in this, as in all other things, he gave no scientific or philosophic solution. He came not to teach a philosophy, but a religion. Not, as has been quaintly said, to teach us how the heavens go, but how we may go to heaven. Instead of solving the problem for the intellects of his disciples, he solved it practically for all those who, adhering to his method, would believe in or- der to know, and obey in order to understand. APPENDIX. 345 There are two precepts of Christianity which seem to me hkely to work out a solution of this problem. When the Forerunner of our Lord said to the soldiers who had inquired of him what they should do, " Be con- tent with your wages," he uttered a precept which, I think, we may take to be universal in its character, and applicable alike in all time for those who work for wages. This, then, is the first of the two precepts to which I have referred. And for the second, I turn to St. Paul, whom I take to have been uttering the mind of his divine Master, his Lord and ours, when he said, " We beseech you, breth- ren, that ye study to be quiet, and to do your own business, and to work with your own hands, as we commanded you. (ist Thessalonians, 4:10, 11.) There may, indeed, arise some doubt whether this is to be taken as a general or universal precept, when we consider the fact that most of the early Christians were poor people, belonging to the laboring classes, as they are called. But when we call to mind the many things that are said in the Bible about the danger of rich men trusting in their riches, and the im- possibility of those who do so entering into the kingdom of heaven, and the many warnings and the denunciations against oppressing the hireling in his wages, I think we shall be reconciled to regarding it as the inculcation of a universal precept of Christianity. Now, I am aware that here is no attempt to determine the amount of wages which the poor should receive or the rich ought to give. I use the words rich and poor as well as capitalist and laborer ; for in the popular sense of the words, and in the discussions of science on this sub- 346 APPENDIX. ject, the laborers are the poor and. the poor are the la- borers ; while for all practical purposes, the rich and the capitalists are one and the same class. I say, then, our Lord makes no attempt to determine the amount of wa- ges that should be given. He recognizes the fact that there are two classes. He doubtless knew, though he did not expressly admit, that the wages of the poor, or the laborers, as modern science prefers to call them, are often grossly and most unjustly inadequate. But he was no agitator. He was no violent revolutionist. He did not even state all the elements of the problem. He told, as was his manner of teaching, what we should do, not what we should say. To the poor he said, " Be content with your wages," and to the rich, "Work with your own hands." This, you may say, was no solution of the problem. And so it was not. But herein is illustrated the contrast between our Lord's method of dealing with the great problems of humanity, and that of the modern men of science, who look to themselves and their own vision rather than to God for their wisdom. Our Lord told men what to do; informed them that knowledge and wisdom — the solution of problems, nay, the comprehen- sion of mysteries — would come in time, as the result of faith working by love. It would come as a result. Mod- ern scientists would, on the other hand, stand and wait, and teach their followers to wait, until the problem is solved and the mystery comprehended, before they begin to work, before they take the first step toward doing what lies before them. And history justifies his method. I have not time to APPENDIX. 347 illustrate ; but all the ages from that day to this are a proof and illustration of the many problems in philoso- phy and science which have been solved in his way. All the fundamental principles of modern life and civilization have been reached by his method. The Greeks, who pursued the other method, speculated and philosophized, and did everything but believe and obey, and yet they solved none of these great problems. Faith and obedi- ence brought the solutions ; and so it will ever be. Po- litical economists have labored long and faithfully — though faithlessly — to determine how much the laborer ought to receive, and how much the capitalist ought to give. But this has hitherto been in vain, and it must be forever in vain if they adopt no other method than the one they have been accustomed to pursue. They may stand, and wait, and speculate forever, but no solution will come in their way. Meanwhile the evil thickens upon them ; the atmosphere is dark with the coming storm; its winds howl and its thunders roar, but they cry in vain for some one to show them any good. Our Lord's solution they will not accept. One of their own they cannot hope to find. But let us preach the Gospel. To the poor say, with our Lord, " Be content with your wages ;" work for what you can get, but work : go to work now ; work always and constantly ; accept what you can get ; deserve more, and in the Lord's good time you will get more if you de- serve it. Doubtless your wages, in some cases at least, are not what they ought to be. But you know, as Chris- tians — if not, it is our pleasure and privilege to teach you — that what you suffer here from the injustice of others 348 APPENDIX. will turn to your account hereafter. Be quiet. Whatso- ever your hands find to do, do it, and be content with your wages. God will take care of the rest." To the rich we should say, "Study to be quiet, to do your own business, and work with your own hands." The former precept — that addressed to the poor — has been pro- claimed and applauded with hurrahs and aniens until the world is sick of hearing it. Its echo, which meets us everywhere, has too much the tone of self-interest and grasping greed to be altogether pleasing to humane ears. The latter — the message to the rich — I fear, is seldom heard anywhere in these days. The prevalent doctrine seems to be that, if a man is able to live without work of any kind, he may do so, and be none the worse Christian for his idleness and self-indulgence. In reference to the purely secular aspect of the problem, however, it may be well enough for us to say that while science has not yet determined, and never can determine precisely, how much of the income of the combined in- fluence of capital and labor should be given to the laborer in order that justice may be done, it does treat of, and has taugljt us one important element of the solution, which, however, is like the Lord's, a practical precept — a direction for action, and not a theoretical solution that gives a precise result. What science has done for us is to teach us that in our country where the laborers are all free, and are, moreover, the equals, both civilly and politically, with the rich, we are to leave the matter to free competition, under the law of supply and demand, and the result will work itself out. It will come by work and not philosophy, by doing what APPENDIX. 349 is before us rather, and not by any a priori speculations on assumed premises. In other countries, it may be other- wise ; but here the laborers are the equals of the employ- ers. They are duly impressed with the dignity and importance of that equality, and they have sufficient self- assertion and independence to demand all they can get. They can hire capital if they cannot get the wages they demand for their labor, and the path is open for them, as they well know to the greatest wealth, the highest offices, and the most coveted social positions. They cannot be oppressed here. The ballot is their defense against all evils that come from that source. The rate of wages can not long be kept below what is fair and just as between the laborer and capitalist, if it is now or ever has been be- low that point. In this way experience will work out the result. Science accepts our Lord's method, and says to both parties. Go to work with things as they are; and science adds something which he did not, with regard to the way in which the method is to work out the solution, and confirms the assurance he gave that it will come. But no solution can come in the speculative or a priori way. It sets the parties to work in the wrong spirit; or rather it recognizes as right their aims and positions while there is an element that is radically wrong in them. The poor are seeking how much they may demand with the prospect of getting it, and trying to get as much as they can for the work they do. And the rich are seeking to give as little as they can for the amount of work they need to have done. And the secular efforts to solve the problem go upon the assumption or admission that this is right. But if there is any one thing that the Gospel 350 APPENDIX. teaches with more plainess and emphasis than another — a doctrine which is confirmed by all the experience of life and all the teachings of history — it is that in all cases of doubt and uncertainty, it is better to err, if err we must, on the side of generosity than on that of selfishness; on the side of self-denial rather than on that of self-in- dulgence. It is better, if either must be, that we suffer wrong than do wrong, to even the humblest and poorest of God's creatures. Let men see and accept this funda- mental truth, and they will find no difficulty in accepting and being satisfied with Christ's method of solving the question of capital and labor. I have no doubt this solution of the problem will be unwelcome to the rich. But let us consider their case a little more in detail. In the first place, let us say emphatically that there is nothing wrong or sinful in the mere fact of one's being rich. Neither the laws of man nor the laws of God set any limits to the amount of wealth one may honestly possess, so far as I know or believe. If one has come honestly by what he has, he may be honest in the posses- sion of it. There may have been dishonesty in the acquisition of it ; there may be wrong and sin in the use that is made of it ; but there is not, necessarily, any wrong or sin in the act of ownership or possession. In the second place, we must define exactly what we mean by work or labor. Labor does not always imply the use of hands or feet. It is not always, nor all of it, occupied with the manual operations so often called work. Work may be of the mind as well as the body. And I would define work to be any occupation of mind or body or both, which is undertaken for the creation of value, or APPENDIX. 351 for the promotion of human good. But in order to be work it must imply thought and direction. It impHes self-denial and self-control, and it must be carried to the point, sometimes at least, of weariness and of fatigue. It must sometimes bring the sweat of the brow, the weary heart, and the aching limbs. Nothing short of this can answer the meaning of the word labor, as used in oui discussion of the problem. It must be exertion for a purpose, and it should be undertaken with a conscious desire of promoting and advancing the welfare of others as well as our own. Doubtless there is much of the ex- ertion that is made by the rich, which they call labor — which, at all events, fatigues and worries and exhausts them — that does not come under this definition. Much of what they do by way Of taking care of what they have, and most of what they do by way of devising and exe- cuting plans for enjoying it, must, I fear, fail to be passed to their credit as work or labor performed in accordance with our Lord's requirement, as stated by St. Paul. La- bor, in the Christian view of it, must be exertion for the good of others, for something that increases the grand aggregate of means to supply human wants ; something that alleviates human suffering, that educates, or helps to educate the ignorant ; to instruct and convert the erring and perverse ; something that does good to men and pro- motes the glory of God. Nothing less than this is the labor we speak of But there is nothing contrary to God's law in a man's being rich. But there is much that is contrary to his law in the way in which rich men, for the most part, live. This may be shown in many ways. 352 APPENDIX. All wealth is created by labor, and is limited in quan- tity. Objects in nature have, indeed, some intrinsic value or capacity to satisfy human wants. But most of them are useless as they are, and derive much of their intrinsic and all of their exchangeable value from human labor. It is labor that gives them their value and makes them wealth. Now, the man, whether rich or poor, who lives without labor, is all the while consuming the products of labor without doing anything to create them. No matter how rich he is, he is living upon other people, consuming what has cost them the sweat of the brow and the weari- ness of the heart, the product of exertions he does not make. Living would be easier for other men, or they would have something more to enjoy in life, if he would take hold and do a part of what needs to be done, and bear a share of the burdens that must be borne by some- body, instead of leaving them all, or as much of them as he can, to others. Again, it is an obvious fact everywhere, that not the sons and daughters of the wealthy are the most enter- prising, the most efficient for good, or the most useful members of society. If the community were made up of them alone, sad indeed would be its case. The very idea that prevails in their childhood's home, that they have enough to live upon, and that, since they have enough they may live without labor, enervates them. They are apt to be as little given to self-control as to self- exertion. Law, and order, and right, and duty are less cared for than ease and mere aesthetic enjoyment. Hence, novels are preferred to science, fiction to fact, and every kind of sentimentalism takes the place of moral earnest- APPENDIX. 353 ness — ritualism takes the place of religion, and we find either a vague pantheistic mysticism, or a still more vague and senseless rationalism, according to the temperament of the individual, instead of that substantial faith in reali- ties unseen which nerves the souls of men and women for great deeds, for endurance, and for martyrdom. But again, the rich, as such, are a short-lived race. I believe it was the great Niebuhr that first called attention to this fact, and all the more recent investigatons have confirmed this statement. It can best, perhaps, be ex- pressed in some such way as the following : The rich families — the capitalists who can live without labor — in a community, consist to-day, we will say, of so many thou- sands. Doubtless they are, in the aggregate, more in number than they were fifty years ago, and they will be more fifty years hence than they are now. But this increase comes entirely from accessions from without. It is not a development from within. New men and new families rise up to join their rank and be counted in the number of the rich. But if we take note of those who are regarded as the rich people or the rich families to- day, it is morally certain that their descendants will be less numerous in the next generation than they are them- selves now. The succeeding generation will witness a still further diminution, and so on, until in a few genera- tions scarcely any of them will remain. Their name and their posterity are clean cut off from the earth. Infer- tility, shrinking from the pains and the perils of child- birth and child-rearing, inefficiency, nervous diseases leading to debility of body and mind, announce the coming doom of family extinction. Such is the fact. 23 354 APPENDIX. Such is God's way of proclaiming in the life of man, in the destiny of families, and in the history of nations, his law that "if any will not work, neither should he eat." Of course there are exceptions to this rule, but they are comparatively few. And I think it will be found that all the exceptions, and the only exceptions, are really no exceptions at all. They are those, who, although rich and powerful, do nevertheless work and labor in the cause of humanity. For it is not wealth but laziness that eats out the manhood of humanity. It is not the posses- sion of much riches, but the indolence and self-indulgence for which wealth furnishes the opportunity and the means, that brings into families the invincible leprosy of decay. If we look into the history of some of the great fami- lies whose lineage has lasted long and occupied a con- spicuous place in the pages of history, we shall see abundant reason to beheve that the cares, anxieties and labors of their respective stations do as effectually ex- clude all thought of ease, idleness, or the indulgence of effeminate luxuries, as the stern necessities of labor and poverty drive these pests of humanity from the dwellings of the humble poor. Thus God in his word and in his work calls us to labor — to labor with the hand or with the head, either or both, according to the endowment he has given us. , Let men, and women too, realize this great law, and set themselves to do the duty to which it points, and the problem of the relation of capital and labor is resolved, or rather disap- pears. The honest poor do not pine or complain be- cause they are poor. It is rather because that, while there is enough and to spare in the world, and within the APPENDIX. 355 very sight of their eyes, they and their families have not the means of culture and education, of social enjoyment and religious worship. And they comi)lain of the rich, not because they are rich, but rather because they con- sume their riches on their lusts, in idleness, self-indul- gence, and are a fraud and cheat — as they, from their point of view, are apt to regard them — a fraud and a cheat upon humanity. But let the rich recognize th^- Christian doctrine of self-denial, and the sacred obliga- tion to labor — an obligation binding equally, though per- haps for different reasons, upon all, whether rich or poor — and show themselves, as Christians ought, to be more ready to sacrifice than to indulge themselves, and live for the good of men and the glory of God, and envy and jealousies on the part of the poor will disappear. I believe the greatest, most fundamental, and the most pernicious error of our age is the doctrine that p^rsoi s, if they are only able to live without work, may do so. In my view, the materialism of scientific men, the ration- alism of compromisers, nay, the doctrine of the Immac- ulate Conception, and of the Papal infallibility itself, are harmless in comparison with this great, wide-spread, and deeply rooted error. They may be refuted by rea- soning; they are all repugnant to the instincts of the hu- man heart in all the hours of its most intense earnest- ness; but this takes from the heart all instincts, but the one it creates and fosters. I think, then, we may clearly infer and confidently teach mankind, that God has clearly foretold, has taught the way to, and in his providence, is working to usher in, that brighter age of humanity — that stage which, accord- 356 APPENDIX. ing to our enunciation at the beginning of this essay, is forthcoming — when all shall be capitalists, and all shall be laborers ; none shall have enough to feel at liberty to live without labor, and no honest laborer shall be so poor that he shall need to be ignorant, boorish, unrefined, and unchristianized. Men will not, of course, be equal in intellect, in station, or in wealth ; but they will be equal in the common lot of humanity, its sin and fall, its re- demption and restoration, the labor that secures the one and the sorrows that are inseparable from the other. And when we all shall feel that to serve God and glorify the name of the Redeemer is more than all else, is so im- portant that all other distinctions and all other consider- ations sink in comparison into utter insignificance, the great problem of capital and labor will have been solved to the satisfaction of all parties, and not, I fear, before that time. I have written earnestly upon this subject, and I have used strong language. I have done it intentionally and designedly, for I believe that, next after the Atonement made on Calvary, to work, and the necessity for it — not works — is the most efficient means of human welfare, whether we regard the condition of the body in this world or the salvation of the soul in the next.* * It formed no part of the subject assigned me to consider the relation of the rich to the poor who cannot work. Although we have them always with us, and are commanded to work that we may have something to give them, my subject related rather to those who are not in a condition to need charity. /» ■• i^ , , . D 1 5 ^N '>- V ^ -* A ■■3 ^>. .^ -^ ^^" "^ -.. .^" . 1 -P ^S.^' "^^. V^ ^/^oro'^v '5,. ''/ ...s' r/^^ V>. - 't ■«^v -' ,0 ,aV '^^ '•'^si.itj^^' ■> . V ^<^, r^^ -.¥ .,~^ C- • •^^ -^. ^. '' .'X- '■ » . , * .J N ' ^0- xr. .V, xV c " '^ -/'