PUBLIC LIBRARY S^m ^ FOUOED MDCCCXCVllI ' DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Class J& Book t\?>*I^ Vo! GIVEN BY 3:W.U out". REPUBLICANISM FRANCE "VJOOTyCTB IDE I2.XJFBE.T. Le peuple sonverain de lui-meme, et chaciin Son propre roi ; c'est la le droit , . . . La foule un jour peut couvrir le principe ; Mais le flot redescend, I'ecume se dissipe, La vague en s'en allant laisse le droit 'a nu. (L'Annee Terrible.) NEW YORK: H. DE Makkil, 42 Great Jones Stkeet. ERIE, PA.: CAUGHEY, McCREARY, & MOORHEAD. 1874. Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1874, By DE RUPERT, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington. 8y Transfer D. C. Public Library JAN 3 1938 V/ITHDEAV/N. 18357 MAR 2 1 :. TO . f eon #arabetta, Wn08E PATKTOTIO, THOTTmi TTNSTrOOESSFUL, EFFORTS TO BEAT BACK THE VICTORIOrS ARMIES OF GERMANY WILL BE FOREVER REMEMBERED BY HIS COUNTRYMEN. IS MOST RESPECTFULLY DEniCATET) BY THE AUTHOR. ^HIwS imperfect Essay is intended as an answer i to such questions as " What do you think of the Republic in France f '• Do you think France wants a republic ^ " etc., etc., which have often been asked me by prominent citizens of this gen- erous land, and more particularly of the hospita- ble and beautiful city wherein T am now writing. T)e R. Erie, Pa., Feb., 1874 REPUBLICANISM IN FRANCE. I. ,NE evening in the year of our Lord 1869, a friend, a gentleman of the modern polit- ical school, whom we will call Monsieur D., and vour humble servant, found themselves in the old-fashioned, aristocratic salon of Monsieur C, a thorough-bred old royalist well known in the metropolis of France. None but the most devout worshipers of the old regime congregated in the famous salon: a fact which, by the way, would naturally lead one to in- quire how two republican canailles like Mon- sieur D. and the writer of this essay happened to be in the midst of these living antiquaries. We have reason to believe that they wished to enroll a few recruits into their thinning ranks. 8 Republicanism in France. It was nearly midnight. The habitues, divided into various groups, were conversing with animation. Some were talking love, others science, politics, literature, art, and phi- losophy ; while a few old wits indulged in calembours, repartees, and nonsense. Mon- sieur C. and my friend D. stood apparently admiring a painting illustrating an episode of Tasso's epic : Clorinda, mortally wounded by her lover Tancred, dies in the arms of the gallant but unfortunate knight. Presently, Monsieur C, tapping my friend on the shoul- der and pointing to the toile, said, in a voice betraying much enthusiasm and emotion : ^^ Ah ! Monsieur, those were glorious days, when France and her allies from various parts of Europe poured their mingled legions of gallant knights upon the plains of old Asia, on to Jerusalem, to deliver the holy sepulchre from the polluting gaze of the Republicanism in France. 9 barbarians, shouting as they went, * God wills it,' while the thousand banners of the cross floated in the air. Look around, upon the pages of history, and tell me where you can find in this century, which scientists, theorists, and political adventurers call the age of Progress — it chills my very blood to think of it — where, I say, can you find such noble, brave, devout, and disinterested men as Godfrey of Boulogne, the Count of Blois, Saint Louis, Richard the lion-hearted, and Robert, to say nothing of the many dis- tinguished ladies, at the head of whom stood, great in faith, the noble Countess of Blois? From the eleventh down to the latter part of the thirteenth century, three hundred thou- sand Frenchmen died fighting in that far-off, mysterious land of the East; and for what purpose? Was it to acquire fame ? Nothing could have been further from their minds. 2 10 Republicanism in France. The Oriental riches tempted their cupidity, some historians are determined to prove, despite the well-known fact that the majority of the nobles sold or mortgaged their estates to defray their expenses ; and those who returned found themselves penniless, homeless, leaving their descendants no other prospect than that of serving as valet in the ante- chamber of the Capetian kings. No, monsieur, neither thirst for fame nor any other worldly thing prompted these men to take the cross ; it was in the defence of their faith that they died and squandered their wealth ; for, you see, France believed in God then — " '' And she does still,'' interrupted D., who, although a republican, happened to be a good Christian. However, to atone for this rather rude interruption, he continued^ lavishing praise on the romantic movement of the Crusades. *^No one/' he said, "has ever Republicanism in Fraj^ce. 11 read with more interest than myself the history of the Crusades. It is with the deepest feeling of respect that I think of the two millions of intrepid Christians whose bones whiten the way to Jerusalem, pointing to future generations the road to the sacred spot whence Jesus dictated that great moral code which has been for more than eighteen hundred years the corner-stone of our civili- zation, and which will continue to be so until, following the course of natural laws, our planet ceases to exist as a compact body. The Crusades opened the era of scholarship and refinement in Northern Europe. The historian, the philosopher, brooding over the ruins of the past, gave to the world most valuable information ; and our muse, shaking off her garment of common-places, donned the Oriental robe, which won many an admirer. The Crusades have done still more 12 Republicanism in France. than this. They sowed the seeds of liberty in our land — " " What !" interrupted the old royalist, " Do I understand you to say ? do you mean to say that the Crusaders were republicans?" ^' No, indeed. Sir/' respectfully replied my friend. " I simply mentioned the fact that among the great moral results brought about by the Crusades, liberty stood prominent as the most beneficial legacy ever bequeathed to humanity." "Stop!" angrily cried the old fossil, re- straining himself with difficulty. "You insult me. Sir," and here the conversation abruptly ended. 11. HE foregoing conversation illustrates, on the one hand, the narrow-mindedness and excessive intolerance of those warm adherents of the doctrine of divine right; loyal men who cannot comprehend why God should postpone the triumphal entry into Paris of the last descendant of the Capetian dynasty, the rightful heir to the throne of France by the grace of God ; while on the other hand it shows the investigating Frenchman defen- ding and propagating thereby the princi- ple of democracy, from the public rostrum, at the theatre, in the street, the church, the peasant^s home, and even under the historical roof of the most powerful and fanatical of conservatives. Having now brought face to face the disci- ples of the old and modern political school, 13 14 Republicanism in France. we will proceed to argue the following propo- sition, viz : How and when has democracy crept in among the down -trodden subjects of the French kings ? France, until the latter part of the eleventh century, could hardly be considered a civilized land. During the five hundred years em- bracing the Merovingian and Carlovingian dynasties, the Franks had certainly gained a little knowledge of the Roman laws and yielded somewhat to the civilizing influence of the people whom they had conquered ; but their wild and quarrelsome instinct stood in bold relief in all their dealings. They were unfit for either command or obedience, even to the church, whose dignitaries they oftentimes insulted, and rightfully, perhaps, since the moral degradation of the priests was not in the least degree exceeded by that of the laymen. A race in such an abject state of Republicanism in France. 15 mind and morals needs the iron hand of a despot. No one would deny this. Is igno- rance supreme in the land — monarchical rule becomes a necessity. Has a nation caught as yet but a feeble glimpse of civilization — despotism is needed. Unfortunately, however, for all systems of despotism, man is susceptible of understand- ing, of progress, and he has understood, and he has progressed. The plebeian foresaw that the recognition of his rights could be brought about only through knowledge and accumulation of property ; and he went to work and he did learn and he did accumulate property ; and behold the impoverished lord borrowing money from an old runaway servant of his who has two ships on the Mediterranean Sea and an elegant mansion in Marseilles. We are in the twelfth century. The first 16 Republicanism in France. Crusade is over. There is everywhere craving for knowledge. The chieftains of the land are impoverished, and commerce, which until then had been almost unknown in Northern Europe, fills the ports with ships laden with the various products of the East. Everything indicates that civilization is rapidly entering on its upward journey. Here democracy takes root. Should the truth of this assertion be questioned, we would furthermore assert that wherever commerce gives anv signs of progress, there also a rapid spread of the prin- ciples inherent to the doctrine of self-govern- ment is sure to take place. Indeed, commerce and industry, by bringing into daily contact different nationalities and personalities of all grades, must eventually be productive of the following results: 1st. The disappearance of national preju- dices. Repubj.icanisxM in France. 17 2d. The shortening of the social distance which has hitherto divided the high and the low. 3d. The rapid growth of knowledge. 4th. Trust, confidence, and friendship ; and, finally, the mingling of all classes in the great struggle for intellectual and pecuniary- supremacy, sweeping in their onward march the decayed social fabric of old. 3 III. ^''HE dawn of the commercial and intellectual 1 era in the land of the Franks sounded the knell of absolute power, by placing in the hands of the serfs the weapons with which seven centuries afterward their chains were to be broken. New powers were now entering the arena. The combined influence of the French King and the Church, under the leadership of the mighty Pope, Gregory the VII., had reduced the oligarchical rule of the feudal lords to nought. The peasants looked to the priests as their saviors, and implored their protection against the usurpation of their royal ruler, who, on the other hand, protected them against the encroachments of those very priests; while a few speculative minds, led 18 Republic ANisi\r in France. 19 by j the famous Abelard, were teaching the young enthusiasts in Paris and the provincial towns that to think without the consent of the Pope, or of any other man, was perfectly legal. This doctrine took well, and, despite the imprisonment of its chief author, continued to gain strength. The abuses of the church and religious innovations began to be talked of. The years rolled on. Margaret of Navarre, Lefevre, Farel, and Calvin inaugur- ate the reformation which, although not recognized by the state, and hunted down by the Roman Inquisition, wins many a firm adherent, pleased with the simplicity of its doctrine, which seems to be more in accordance with the Scriptural faith than that of the Romish Church. The reformed church did not only renew the primitive faith, pure and simple, which is 20 Re^tjblicanism in France. much ; it was also a decided intellectual improvement on its crumbling but yet power- ful rival of Rome : and to the philosophical observer, here lies its merit and the secret of its success. It diffused education among the masses, impelled scientific researches and phi- losophical speculations, and helped to bring about the overthrow of monarchism in America and France : so overwhelmingly true is it that knowledge and true Christianity cannot coin- cide with absolutism. One of these powers must then be annihilated. Which one shall be cast to oblivion ? The future answers : Absolutism, and the whole world shouts : Amen ! From the dawn of the twelfth century to the great social upheaval in 1789, republican- ism had steadily been working in France, doing away, aided by its kings, with the old Republicanism in France. 21 theocratic and feudal systems, which dated from Gregory the YII and Innocent the III., " a solution which submitted Europe to the pontifical power of Rome, and produced the epic movement of the Crusades/'* But when theocracy and feudalism were conquered, royalty was no longer wanted. On the other hand, finding that it was becoming useless to the welfare of France, royalty joined that which remained of the disciples of theocracy and feudalism, in order to bring back the people to their former submission; but the latter, though often crippled by the combined forces of their adversaries, held firm to their position. Such is the struggle which has been going on for the last eighty-four years in France, leaving, as it were, the political problem of that country comparatively un- solved, despite the Republic of MacMahon *A contemporary. 22 Republicanism in France. and the ( so - called ) National Assembly. It is doubtless these facts which have given rise to two distinct theories. The first, in- augurated by the adherents of the old regime, is : " That a government by the people is the fancy of demagogues ; that it has been tried and proved a most miserable failure ; that it is productive of nothing but mediocrities in the realms of politics, philosophy, science, art, and literature ; and that petty jealousies, selfishness, irreligion, and immorality, the natural offshoots of decayed intellect, cut short the existence of that political dream, called republicanism/' The second, which seems to be popular with Americans at large, is : " That the fickleness, the inconsistency, the peculiar code of morality which can put the mildest puritan to flight. Republicanisjm in France. 23 and the religious skepticism of the French, make doubtful the stability of self-government with them." Let us now look into these doctrines, for it would be well to see, after a conscientious review of historical facts, whether they should be admitted as incontestable truths, or indig- nantly discarded as puerile combinations of parties, either interested or misinformed. IV. fISTORY shows that the dawn of democ- racy among Pagan and Christian nations, has, in all cases which we know of, paved the way to most progressive eras. The Republics of Athens, Carthage, Venice, etc. , oligarchical though they were, reached the pinnacle of military and intellectual greatness. Let us prove this assertion. The great captains, Themistocles and Mil- tiades ; the poets, all^schylus, Sophocles, Euripides, Aristophanes; the historians, Herodotus and Xenophon ; the philosophers, Zeno, Socrates, Democrates, Plato, and Aris- totle ; the statesman, Pericles ; the scientist, Hippocrates, and many other names well known to the student of history, were citizens of the Republic of Athens. 24 Republicanism in P^rance. 25 The Roman Republic has been as prolific of great names as its Grecian rival. Regains, Fabius, Marcellus, and the two Scipios com- manded its armies ; Sallustius, Hirtius Pansa, Nepos, and Livius wrote its history ; Flavins, Terentius, Catullus, Virgilius, and Horatius sung its praise ; Cicero and Cato arraigned its citizens and Virtruvius built its palaces. The great Carthaginian warriors, Hannibal, Hasdrubal, and Hamilcar, made their republic forever famous. Venice gave to the world some of its greatest artists and savans. Cromwell, Milton, Newton, Bunyan, Dry- den, and Locke flourished during the nominal Republic of Great Britain. In France, Montesquieu, Voltaire, Rous- seau, Diderot, Lafayette, Napoleon, Mirabeau, Ney, Dan ton, Chateaubriand, Michelet, Thiers, 4 26 Republicanism in France. Lamartine, LaPlace, Legendre, Cuvier, Renan, Littre, Comte, Victor Hugo, Louis Blanc, Gambetta, and Rochefort are all more or less identified with the Republic, and they are indeed the greatest names of France. Let us now come to the United States. The grand Republic. The eldest daughter of our civilization. " The home of the free." Oh, precious land of liberty ! may God continue to bless thee ! is the earnest prayer of a refugee. A hundred years ago, this broad land was but an humble colony of three or four million inhabitants, scattered through New England, Eastern New York and Pennsylvania, and some of the Southern States, and paying their annual tribute to the British Crown; and behold now a nation of some forty millions of free citizens, whose thrift, energy, patriotism. REprtJUCANisM IN France. 27 Christian principle, wealth, and general intel- lectual attainment have raised her to the foremost rank amongst nations. To be scarce a century old, and to lead Europe in the path of progress appears fabulous, but it is nevertheless strictly true, if it be admitted that the working, in its full completeness, of the doctrine preached nineteen centuries ago, by the Divinity itself, embodying liberty, fraternity, and equality, or, in other words, the leveling of castes, the freedom, happiness, and enlightenment of all, constitutes progress. It has often been surmised by European and even American writers of the conservative school, that this Republic, owing its rapid growth strictly to a feverish thirst for gain, will eventually end in an oligarchy of wealth.* *"It is easy to see where North America stands at present, and whither it is tending. Its rapid progress, due to the most degrading workf<, has fascinated Europe ; 28 Republicanism in France. There may be some truth in this assertion ; but if three years of constant study of the politico-social organization of this land entitle your humble servant to an opinion on this seemingly grave question, he would beg to differ with the learned writers above alluded to. In the first place, the general and rapid prosperity of IN'orth America is not exclusively, though in a great measure, due to speculations in stocks, etc. Other powers have been at work to build this gigantic machinery. George Washington was no railroad king. Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, Calhoun were no brokers. Adams, the two Websters, Lincoln, Grant, but the results of this progress, exclusively material, already appear. Barbarism, profligacy, general bank- ruptcy, systematic destruction of the native races, idiotic slavery of the conquerors, bound to the most trying and repulsive of lives under the yoke of their own machinery. " America might founder in the ocean once for all, and the human race would suffer no loss thereby. Not Republicanism in France. 29 Sherman, Thomas Paine, Poe, Irving, Cooper, Holmes, Longfellow, Bryant, Whittier, Mrs. Stowe, Franklin, Prof. Morse, Agassiz, Greeley, Sumner, Wendell Phillips, Emerson, Henry Ward Beecher, George William Curtis, and Hiram Powers are not known to the world as princes of finance ; and the thousands of churches, school-houses, and newspaper offices scattered throughout the land, were never used in the manufacture of broadcloth and pig-iron. There are indeed here, as in many other countries, parvenus who, forgetting their own origin, sneer at the ^^ government of a saint, not an artist, not a thinker has it produced, unless one may term thought the aptitude for twisting iron for the construction of freight trains. The priests who wear out their lives there cannot create a civilization. Thus far there is no civilization in America, and as far as appear- ances go, there never will he." — Louis Veuillot, '^ Paris U'nive7\s.'^ so Republicanism in France. the plebs ;" but their iDfluence does Dot go beyond a certain class of sneaks whose ridiculous family pretensions contrast singu- larly with their crude conception of social ethics and strange (not to say low) tastes. It would be absurd to think that such inoffensive idiots could ever endanger the liberties of this great people. Let us come to the second doctrine, now that we have put in its full relief the following truths, viz : That republicanism is no fancy, but a most practicable theory; that it is conducive to the highest intellectual attainment and general prosperity of a state ; and, that there being no vices or telling defects inherent to its principles, the frequent occur- rences of its overthrow have always been the result of human depravities. V. ^JRANCE has been, from time immemorial, ^ the subject of much study, and yet she remains an enigma to the world. Unlike other countries, there are no rules whereby she can be judged ; for she violates all rules. To day, as obedient to the laws as a Spartan Helot; to-morrow, behold her throwing the head of her king into the bloody basket of the guillotine. Ninety-four finds her sinking into the lowest depths of anarchy ; and ten years later she holds firm in her grasp the destinies of the civilized world. Eighteen hundred sixty-nine comes. You remember that year, do you not, reader ? If you do not, I do ; and there comes a chill creeping all over my body every time I think of it. I feel as though I was drawn by the feet into the icy regions of Dante's Hell ; but on the 31 32 Republicanism in France, other hand, with the thought of eighteen hundred seventy-three comes a pleasant re- action. The contrast is immense. Since the advent of the " Maid of Orleans/' France had never fallen so low as during the last war. Her armies were lying in German prisons. Her cannons, Chassepots, and sixty flags captured. The enemy holding twenty-nine of her strongholds and a third of her territory. Eighty thousand brave fellows killed. Two rich provinces lost. Nine hundred million dollars gone to the winds, and nine hundred millions more to be paid as indemnity to the Germans. Society crumbling to pieces, and anarchy, famine and despair staricg every one in the face. That is the France of three years ago; and now she is free, and at peace with the world and herself. Her indemnity is paid ; her finances in a tolerably good condition, and her commerce and industry flourishing. Republicanis:\[ in France. 83 Society has regained its equilibrium, and the world is compelled to admit that the mighty- deeds which she has performed during the last three years, throw in the shade the most glorious epochs of her former history. The twelve revolutions through which France has passed during the last eighty -four years would be enough to lead the superficial foreign observer to infer that the French are, and ever will be, incapable of self-government. This is, however, a mistake. That which seems to be inconsistency and fickleness with them is, in reality, merely their marvelous power of adaptability to the numerous political changes naturally involved in a long contest for supremacy; betwixt knowledge and indus- try, representing the republic on one hand, and monarchism, with its decayed principles, prejudices, and religious fanaticism, on the other. To be incapable of enjoying a liberty 6 34 Republicanism in France. which it has taken eight hundred years of constant labor and much bloodshed to win! Ah ! think of it. Is not this the height of absurdity ? VI. ^JOREIGN geographers tell the children, with an assurance characteristic of text- books, that the French are a social, courageous, but immoral race; or something to that effect. A thorough diagnosis of the French character will not be needed here to refute the latter part of this geographical saying, since it is ac- knowledged by historians and moralists of all times and nationalities, and by all the people who possess any knowledge of human nature, that wherever immorality dwells courage is there unknown. This assertion admits of exceptions, of course, but they are few. Moral depravity is not at home on the field of honor. If it be admitted that one of the Frenchman's most prominent characteristics is courage, it must also be granted that this much-abused individual does not spend his life in the pursuit of lustful pleasures. 35 36 Republicanism in France. "Paris is indeed the haunt of vice/^ wrote lately the correspondent of a New York paper. Perhaps it is; but what of that? Paris is not all France ; and even were it so, has it not been admitted by foreigners (and we have ourselves purposely tested the truth of this assertion) that more than one-half of the regular patrons of fashionable places of ill -re- pute are Germans, Russians, Italians, English, and (shall we say) Americans ? We have no inclination to deny that there are in France profligates, men and women of doubtful virtue; but we do most emphatically assert that they do not represent more than one- sixtieth of the population. An English contem- porary, whose name we have forgotten, asserts that there are more illegitimate births in most European States, including even Scotland (in proportion to the population), the land of propriety of speech and of action, than in REPUBLICANlSai TN FrANCE. 37 France. Furthermore, the general good health and industrious habits of the French, and their excessive fondness for home, show, if anything, that the disgusting epithet, immoral, when applied to the nation at large, is a gross calumny. We come now to the so-called irreligious sen- timent of the French. We are aware that this unexpected "' so-called '^ will give rise to many a skeptical smile. It is well. Smile, if you wish ; but read on, we beg of you. France has a population of thirty-six millions. Twenty- five millions are tillers of the soil ; and, it is well known, the most fanatical of believers. The number of priests. Christian brothers and nuns reaches two hundred thousand. There are eighteen hundred thousand Protestants, whose faith in the Lord is unquestionable. The re- maining nine millions include at least five million women and children, and the French wo- 38 Republicanism in France. man and child are most devout Catholics. These statistics show that there are in France thirty- two million believers, leaving only four million sworn enemies to the established church ; and yet the French are called anti-religious. Now, in justice to these four million indi- viduals, let us investigate what sort of a church it is they are so anxious to annihilate. ^ It is a church which declared heresy a crime worthy of death, and that the grace of God would follow the murderers of heretics.* It is a church which claims the power " to make just that which is unjust, and unjust that which is just ;"t and boldly informs the world that '^ the tribunal of the Pope and the tribunal of God is one and the same thing /^ that " when the Pope thinks, it is God who ♦Innocent III. letter 11th. Urban, II. in a letter to the Bishop of Lucqnes. Decretals (Part ii, ch. 15). tCommentators on the Canon Law quoted by Des- saulles. Republicanism in France. 39 thinks through him ;'^* that " the Pope is a God upon earth ;"t that ^' he is less than God but more than man f^l that " he has about the same power as God ;^'§ that " he will judge the saints and the angels in Heaven ;"|| that ^^ he is our Lord God ;"1[ that '' he is the sovereign judge of civil laws ;'^** and that "the most depraved monk is better than the best laity/'tt "'^ It is a church which sends to hell all non- believers in its infallibility, and condemns liberty of conscience, despite the famous precept of Paul : " Examine all well and take *CivUta CattoUca (the acknowledged organ of the Pope) of 1870. fBishop Alvare Pelage, tinnocent III. §Julianus (one of the best authorities among canonists.) Illnnocent IV. Letter to the Emperor Frederic. IZenzolius. **Clvllta CattoUca, March 18th, 1871. ttSt. Pierre Damien and PiUchdorff. 40 Republicanism in France. that which is good ;'^ and of James, who said : " The law of Christ is the law of liberty/' It is a church which seems to have so far forgotten, or rather so to antagonize certain Scriptural teachings, that the unprejudiced observer is compelled to question its Chris- tianity. It is a church which refuses a last prayer for the unknown dead, fearing it might be the mortal remains of a heretic ! It is the church which, through the celibacy of its priests and nuns, has been the chief cause of the depopulation not only of France,* but also of Austria, Spain, Italy, and *In the year 1500 there were in France 40,000 religious men and women, in a marriageable state ; a number that would have given, supposing three children for each generation : In 1530 120,000 children, and later 60,000 couple. In 1560 these 60,000 couple could have given 180,000 children, or 90,000 couple, and so on for every thirty years, giving for 1874 over 11,000,000 inhabit- ants. These statistics need no comments. Republicanism in France. 41 South America, threatening thereby the final extinction of the Catholic races. It is the church which condemns all consti- tutions based upon the principle of the sovereignty of the people ; calls for an immediate destruction of educational estab- lishments which it cannot control ; curses the universities, and upholds the doctrine of intellectual stagnation. 'r It is the church which, through its arro- gance, hypocrisy, and everlasting crusades against intellectual progress, religious and political liberties, has succeeded most admirably in creating, amongst the thinking classes of Catholics f a feeling of indifference or disgust towards Christianity itself.* *Roman Catholic polemics maintain that Protestant- ism is responsible for the skepticism and unbelief that prevail so extensively among the Christian nations. They assert that there has arisen in the wake of Protes- tantism a spirit of irreligion, which threatens to subvert 6 42 Republicanism in France. The most powerful enemy which the French Republic has to contend with, is again the same church ; and before many years have elapsed, my American friends, you will also the social fabric. The causes of this evil, however, do not lie at the door of Protestantism. The free inquiry that has developed in Europe, in connection with the revival of learning, could not be smothered by mere authority. The earnest rehgious feeling, which the Reformation at the outset brought with it, counteracted the tendencies to unbelief, for a time, at least ; and it was only when Protestantism departed from its own principles, and acted upon the maxims of its adversary, at the same time losing the warmth of religious life so conspicuous at the beginning, that infidelity had a free course. The ideas which Plutarch long ago embodied in his treatise on Superstition and Unbelief are well founded. They are two extremes, each of which begets the other. Not only may the artificial faith which leads to superstitious practices and drives its devotees to fanaticism at length spend its force, and move the same devotees to cast off the restraints of religion, but the spectacle of superstition, also, repels more sober and courageous minds from all faith and worship. Such has been the notorious effect of the superstitious ceremonies and austerities of the Roman Catholic system, both in the age of the Renaissance and in our own day. Religion comes to be identified, in the opinions of men, Rkpublicanism in France. 43 feel the might of this same power, should you neglect to apply the preventive in time. Now, ought the antagonists of that self-styled with tenets and observances which are repugnant to reason and common sense ; and hence truth and error are thrown overboard at once. Disgusted with the follies which pass under the name of religion, and attract the reverence of the ignorant, men make ship- wreck of faith altogether. The same baleful influence ensues upon the attempt to stretch the principle of authority beyond the due limit. It is like the effect of excessive restraint in the family. A revolt is the conse- quence wherever there is a failure to repress mental activity and to enslave the will. The subjugation of the intelligence which the Roman Catholic system car- ries with it as an essential ingredient, compels a mutiny which is very likely not to stop with the rejection of usurped authority. . . Looking at the matter historically, w^e find that, in the age prior to the Reformation, unbelief was most rife in Italy, the ancient centre of the Roman Catholic hierarchy. In recent times skepticism is nowhere more prevalent than among the higher, cultivated classes in Roman Catholic coun- tries, where the doctrines of that religion have been perpetually taught, and where its ritual has been cele- brated with most pomp.— Pro/. George P. Fisher, D.D., of Yale College : Extract from a Paper read before the Evangelical Alliance held in New York, October, 1873. 44 Republicanism in France. infallible church to be branded to the world as "disciples of the Devil/^ "enemies of society," "crazy reds/^ etc., or as earnest, if not always successful, seekers after truth, and intelligent advocates of the liberty of con- science? We beg leave to demand of the enlightened Protestant clergy of this Christian land an answer to this question. The arguments set forth in support of the complex theories which we have been discuss- ing in the last three sections of this Essay, have, we hope, been sufficiently refuted to satisfy the reader of their utter worthlessness. Let us now throw a rapid glance over the actualpolitical field of France, and see what can be deduced therefrom. VII. HE French National Assembly is perhaps the most singular political phenomenon of modern history. It might well be compared to a ship left in the command of a crew in full mutiny. The violence of speech charac- teristic of the several parties which compose that body, and their cordial hatred of each other, would seem to attest the truth of this parallel. Here the Legitimists and Orleanists clamor for a king, foretelling an immediate return to the golden age which never existed, not even in the time of the canonized Louis, the wisest of all French monarchs. There the Bonapartists, with an impudence never surpassed by their deceased chief in his palmiest days, uphold the governmental 45 46 Republicanism in France. doctrine inaugurated by the great man of Austerlitz and buried with the man of Sedan. Opposite this group, surrounding the banner of absolutism, move, wide awake, and bound by a common idea, and perhaps as unscrupulous as their opponents — and as all politicians are — the clever representatives of modern civilization. Known as Republicans, Moderate Republicans, Red Republicans or Oommuneux (not petroleurs), the latter advocate, from their respective points of view, a form of government more likely to coincide with the spirit of liberalism characteristic of our epoch : in other words, a government by and for the people. Which is to be the happy victor ? Whither is this obstinate political tournament leading France ? Worthy representatives of the old noblesse Republicanism in France. 47 who fought on many a battle-field for the honor and the glory of France, the Legiti- mists, were made conspicuous by the famous fusion. Their devotion to the cause of royalty and their faith in its ultimate success cannot be questioned. Yet, their most skillfully arranged plan failed. The Count de Cham- bord had the good sense to see in his visit to France that he was not wanted there. The indifference of the people, and the democratic atmosphere which he was compelled to breathe in the very face of his ancestor at the Pont Neuf, chilled him to the heart, and, like a far-seeing man that he proved to be, he preferred not to risk his head for a crown. This rather unexpected action on the part of the Bourbon Prince dealt an irreparable blow to the party which so faithfully upheld his candidature to the throne, and it looks very much now as thouo-h it was doomed to return 48 Republicanism in France. to the quite domestic life from which it emerged at the downfall of the Imperial regime. Beloved by the high bourgeoisie, but antag- onized by all the parties and the country at large, the Orleanists, it seems to us, might as well give up all hope to crown one of their sires. The revolution of 1848 condemned Philippism to an everlasting slumber. Despite their well-phrased apologies, the Bonapartists will not be likely to induce the people to believe that either Thiers or Gambetta, and not their immaculate hero and '^ martyr," Napoleon, has covered France with woe, misery, and shame, and whitened her frontiers with the bones of thousands of her brave children. That Napoleon was forced into the war by his advisers — *whicli is perhaps true — does not REPUliLICANIS-AI IN FllANCE. 49 alter tlie fact that he is responsible for the disasters which ensued. (^ui tk'iit le ijouctr/Kiil doit connaltre lecut'd^* is a truth which it would be ridicu- lous to question. In short, France has had enough of Csesarism. The imperial regime is already a thing of the past, and ere long the people will forget that it ever existed. Ever since the existence of the Versailles Assembly, and more particularly after the overthrow of M. Thiers, these three factions, bound by a mutual fear of their common enemy, the Republic, have been the absolute rulers of France. Being elected during the period of despondency subsequent to the fall of the Empire, these petty monarchs do not to-day represent the people of France, and should the radicals succeed in bringing about *LaHarpe — "Whoever is at the ]ielm must know where perils lie." 50 Republicanism in France. the dissolution of the Assembly, they would be sent away rusticating, leaving their places to be filled by republicans ; but they are, nevertheless, the legal delegates of the nation, and as such they shrewdly invested themselves with a power which has so far dwarfed the efforts of the dissolutionists and made the country submissive to their will, and, should they continue to oppose a solid, unwa- vering front to their republican antagonists, it is probable that they will hold the sceptre until the expiration of President MacMahon's term of office. However, the entente, ^Yh'lch. has heretofore constituted the strength of these opponents of democracy, will doubtless be brought to an end ere the septennial power is over, through the impatience which the parties already manifest to make sure the success of their respective claimants to the throne, hastening thereby their overthrow and the final Republicanis:\i in France. 51 triumph of the worthy representatives of the Left, the triumph of a Republic, not royal like that of MacMahon, or socialistic, like that dreamed of by the Internationalists ; but mod- erate and rational — a republic which will not debase and destroy, but instruct and build, up- rooting thereby the last vestige of absolutism. Changes (which the most far-reaching minds fail to discover on the political horizon) antagonistic to the working of democratic institutions might, however, occur during the next twenty-five years. Absolutism might again appear at the surface, but like a dark cloud in a clear sky, it would be swept away by the resistless breath of democracy ; for Frenchmen Forget not The price for Freedom paid, The blood, the treasure, sufferings, tears. On their country's altar laid ;* *A. H. Caiighey— Poe?/i5, page 63. 52 Republicanism in France. they are born democrats; the republic is in their blood. M. Thiers well understood this when he said that '^ the Republic is the only government possible for France.'^ Cha- teaubriand, the great writer and veteran monarchist, went still further. He foretold almost half a century ago, not simply the final triumph of the republic, but also a complete reorganization of the social structure. '•'' The foUovnvff was written, in 1834- and 18S6, hy Cha- teaubriand : "Europe runs to democracy. France herself is nothing but a Republic trammeled by a King. The people have served their time as pages. Princes have enjoyed la garde-nohle long enough. To-day, nations arrived at their majority assume to have no more need of tutors. From David down kings have been called. To day, in their turn, nations ase called. The exceptions of the Greek, Carthaginian, and Roman Republics do not alter the general political fact that the normal state of society upon this globe has been monarchical. Now society abandons monarchy : at least such monarchy as it has known heretofore. '• Symptoms of this social transformation abound on every hand. Vain are all attempts to reconstitute a REPUBLICANlSAt IN l^^NCE. 5*^ Whether the latter of these prophecies is party whose principle shall be government by one. The elenientary principles of such a government can be found no more : men are as much changed as principles are. Even the facts, however contrary they may seem, tend no less to establish the same result, as in a machine, the wheels which turn in contrary directions produce a common motion. " Sovereigns submitting gradually to popular innova- tions, separating themselves without violence and with- out shock from their pedestal, transmit to their sons, in a period more or less extended, their hereditary sceptre reduced to proportions measured by law. But no one understands the event. Kings become obstinate in keeping that which they should not know how to retain ; instead of gracefully descending the inclined plane, they expose themselves to falling into the abyss ; instead of dying a beautiful death, full of honors and of days, monarchy runs the risk of being fla5^ed alive. ''Nations the least prepared for liberal institutions, such as Spain and Portugal, are pushed on to constitu- tional movements. In these countries ideas are in advance of man. France and England, like two enor- mous battering-rams, are striking tremendous blows against the crumbling ramparts of ancient society. *'The boldest doctrines of liberty, equality, and fraternity are proclaimed evening and morning in the face of monarchs who tremble behind a triple defense of suspected soldiers. The deluge of democracy is gaining on them ; they mount step by step from the foundation 54 Republicanism in France. likely to be fulfilled, we will not pause to to the roof of their palaces, from whence they throw themselves forth to swim in the tide which has engulfed them. "The discovery of printing has changed all social conditions; the press, that engine which nothing can crush, shall continue to destroy the ancient world, until she has formed of it a new one. It is a voice calculated for the universal forum of the people. Printing is only the Word, first of all powers. The Word has created the universe. Unhappily the word, in man, shares human infirmities. Evil is mingled with the good, so that our fallen nature does not retain its original purity. " The transformation demanded by this age of the world will take place. All is calculated in this design. Nothing is possible now but the natural death of society, whence it shall go forth again to a newer and better existence. It is impious to struggle against the Angel of God; to believe that we shalJ arrest Provi- dence. Viewed from this point, the French revolution is only one part of the general revolution. All anxiety ceases. All the axioms of ancient politics become inap- plicable, ''Louis Philippe has ripened in a half century the democratic harvest. The bed bourgeoise, where was planted Philipism, less worked by the Revolution than the military or popular beds, furnished still some vigor to the vegetation of the seventh of August, but it, too, will soon be exhausted. Republicanism in France. 55 argue. It would not, however, be hazardous "There are religious men who revolt at the first supposition of anything hard and severe in the actual order of things. 'There are,' say they, 'some inevita- ' ble reactions— some moral reactions. If the monarch ' who initiates us into liberty has paid in his qualities the * despotism of Louis the Fourteenth and the corruption ' of Louis the Fifteenth, can anyone believe that the debt ' contracted by equality at the scaffold of an innocent ' king will not be acquitted ? Equality, in losing its life, ' has expiated nothing. Weeping at the last moment * cannot redeem anyone. The tears of fear moisten only 'the breast, but fall not upon the conscience. What I ' can the race of Orleans reign in sight of the crimes and ' the vices of its ancestors ! Where then would be Prov- ' idence ? A more terrible temptation could never have * assailed virtue, accused eternal justice, and insulted the * existence of God.' "I have heard these arguments made; but must we conclude from them that the sceptre of the ninth of August is to be broken immediately. "In elevating itself in the universal order, the reign of Louis Philippe is only an apparent anomaly — only an infraction, not real, to the laws of morality and equity. They are violated, these laws, in a sense limited and relative. They are obeyed in an unlimited and general sense. From one enormity permitted by God I draw a high conclusion. I deduce from it the Christian proof of the abolition of Boi/aJfy in France. It is this very abolition, and not an individual chastisement, which will 56 Republicanism in France. to assert that the first has become, or is on the be the expiation of the death of Louis XVI. After this act of retributive justice, the Diadem iDill never again sit firmly vpo)i any head ! Napoleon, spite of bis victories, saw it fall from his brow ; Charles the X., in spite of piety. To complete the disgrace of the crown in the eyes of the people, the sons of the regicide will be per- mitted to rest a moment in the bloody bed of the martyr. "Royalty is doomed. It must pass away. What are three, four, six, ten, twenty years in the life of a people? Ancient society perished with the political conditions which gave it birth. At Rome the reign of a man was substituted for that of law by Caesar. They passed from the Republic to the Empire. Revolution is going on to-day, but in a contrary direction ; the law dethrones the man. We pass from Royalty to Republicanism. The era of the People is come. It remains to see how it will be filled. "Europe must first be settled into the same sys- tem. One cannot imagine a representative government in France while all around her are absolute monarchies. Should this happen, she must not only sustain foreign wars on every hand, but struggle at home against a double anarchy — moral and physical. "What shall be said upon the division of property? Shall it remain as it is ? A state of society where some individuals have an income of two millions, while others are reduced to filling their wretched lodgings with heaps of decay, in order to breed worms — worms which, sold to the fishermen, are the sole means of subsistence Republicanism! in France. 57 point of becoming, an accomplished fact. of the families themselves ? Can such a society remain stationary, upon such foundations, in the midst of the general progress of ideas ? "But if it shall touch upon the matter of property, there will result immense overturnings which will not be accomplished without the sheddmg of blood. The law of blood and of sacrifice is everywhere. God ^ delivered His son to the death of the cross, that he might remodel the order of the universe. Before any new rights can be evolved from this chaos, the stars shall often rise and set. The eighteen hundred years since the Christian era have not sufficed to abolish slavery. Still only a small part of the gospel mission is accomplished. " These calculations suit not French impatience. In revolutions the element of time is not admitted ; there- fore they are always confounded by results contrary to their hopes. While they overturn, Time re-arranges. It brings order from disorder. It rejects the green fruit ; it gathers the ripe. It sifts and sorts men, manners, and ideas. "Modern society has taken ten generations to settle itself. Now it is unsettled. The generations of the middle ages were vigorous because they were in an ascending progression. "This waning world shall not gather again its strength until it shall have reached the last step, whence it shall remount to a new life. We are only passing 8 58 Republicanism in France. This may not please the army of political generations : obscure, intermediate generations, doomed to oblivion, forming the chain to clasp the hands of those who shall reap the harvests of the Future. " Respecting misfortune — respecting my own self — what I have served, and what I shall continue to serve, at the price of the repose of my old age. I would fear to pronounce, while living, a single word which could wound the unfortunate or even destroy their chimeras. But when I shall be no more, my sacrifices shall give to my tomb the right to speak the truth. My duty will be changed. The interests of my country shall carry it away upon the engagements of honor, from which I shall be released. To the Bourbons belongs my life ; to my country belongs my death. I, a prophet, in quitting this world, trace my predictions upon my last failing hours, leaves sere and withered, which the breath of eternity shall soon bear away. If it be true that the lofty race of the kings, refusing to be enlightened, approach to the end of their power, would it not be better in their historic interest that, by an end worthy of their grandeur, they retire into the holy night of the past, "Draped with the shadows of the dead centuries. " Society, such as it is to-day, will not prosper, until the inferior classes are educated ; until they discover the secret plague which has infected social order since the beginning of the world; the plague which is the cause of all evils, and of all popular agitations. The Republicanism in France. 59 canters known to the world as conservatives too great inequality of fortunes and conditions has been able to maintain itself thus, because it has been con- cealed, on the one side by ignorance, and on the other Bide by the false organizations of the city. But as soon as that general inequality is perceived by all, then the mortal blow is struck. "Reorganize, if you can, the aristocratic fictions; attempt to persuade the poor man, when he shall have learned to read, the poor man to whom the daily press brings news from city to city and from village to village. Attempt to persuade this poor man, thus enlightened, possessed of the same intelligence as you, that he ought to submit to all such privations, while another man, his neighbor, has, without labor, a thousand times the superfluities of life. Your eiforts will be useless. Do not demand of the crowd virtues which are beyond human nature. "The development of material resources of society shall also add new impulse to the development of Mmd. When steam shall be perfected; when joined with telegraphs and railroads it shall make distances disappear, it will not onlj'^ be commerce of the nations which will travel from one end of the world to the other with the rapidity of lightning, but it will be ideas also. "When all financial and commercial barriers shall have been abolished between the several States, as they already are between the provinces of the same State ; when the payment of wages, which is only a vestige of 60 Kepublicanism in France. of the old regime, ultramontane Catholics, and slavery, shall be abolished because of the equality established between the producer and the consumer ; when the various nations, adopting the manners of each other, abandoning national prejudices, — those old ideas of supremacy and conquest shall tend to the unity of the people ; — by what means, think you, can society retrograde to the principles of the dark ages ? Bona- parte himself has not the power to do it. Equality and liberty, to which he opposed the inflexible bar of his mighty genius, have resumed their destined course, and carried before them his works. The dominion of force which he created has vanished; his institutions have failed. The light which he kindled was only a meteor. "There was only one original monarchy in Europe — the French— all the rest are her daughters. All of them will pass away with their mother. Kings have lived, behind this monarchy a thousand years, sheltered by a race incorporated with the centuries. When the breath of the Revolution cast down that race, Bonaparte arose. He held the tottering princes upon the thrones which he overthrew and built up. Bonaparte passes away. The monarchs remain living drearily amid the ruins of the Napoleonic coliseum as the hermits who beg alms at the Coliseum at Rome. But soon these ruins even will fail them. "But when shall this reorganization of society be accomplished ? When society, (composed of old*, of family circles from the fireside of the laborer to the fire- side of the kingjj shall be reconstructed upon a system Republicanism in France. t>l imperialists : but it will please four-fifths of the nation, which is much better. In short, France has spoken. She demands the Repub- lic. She will have it. Her will is henceforth to be her law. as yet unknown — a system more in accordance with nature, after ideas and by aid of means which are innate. God knows when. Who can calculate the resistance of passion, the crushing of vanity, the perturbations and accidents of history ? An unexpected war, the sudden appearance at the head of a nation of a man of brains, or a stupid man, the smallest event can suspend or hasten the march of the nations. Many a time death has quenched nations full of fire, turned to silence events ready to be accomplished, as a little snow fallen during the night, can hush the noise of a great city. "The future will surely be a future of power, free in all the fulness of the gospel equality ; but it is far away still — far away beyond the sweep of the visible horizon. Before reaching that end — before attaining to the unity of the nations — democracy must pass through social anarchy, through times of peril, of blood maybe, of weakness certainly. This crisis has begun. It is not yet ready to bring forth results ; in germ only exists the new world." ..^^S^K-H5 wrg^^: •\^^:^yr^. K- -p>,T "^"t&iMB ^' '"" '^^TEN^ "^ ■m