il^\;; 
 
^s^s^^sse^ ^c^ g^ a g^g ^^ 
 
 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. I 
 
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 
 
REPORT 
 
 Joint Special Committee 
 
 TO INVE.STIGATK 
 
 THE CAUSE OF THE OUTBREAK OF DISF^ASE AMONG 
 THE CATTLE AT THE STATE COLLEGE FARM, 
 
 The Loss and Disposal of Cattle Therefrom, 
 
 AND THK 
 
 DOINGS AND COKRESrONDENCE OF THE COMMISSIONERS ON 
 CONTAGIOUS DISEASES AMONG CATTLE IN RELA- 
 TION TO THE SAME, 
 
 I ^ TOCiKTHEK WITH THE 
 
 Tcslinionv Taken Bcloie I lie CommilliT. 
 
 AUGUSTA: 
 
 SPRAGL'K & SON, PRINTERS TO THK STATE. 
 1887. 
 
STATE OF MAINE. 
 
 In Senate, Febiuary 12, 18S7, P. M. 
 
 Ordered. That a Joint Special Gomnjittec, consisting of Senators Allen 
 of Knox and Rich of Waldo, with Representatives Walton of Skowhegan, 
 Libby of Biirnliani and Adams of Litchfield, are hereby instructed to in- 
 vestigate the cause or causes of the late outbreak of disease among the 
 cattle at the State College farm, the loss of other cattle at said farm prior 
 to that time, the disposal of cattle sold therefrom, and the doings and cor- 
 respondence of the commissioners on contagious diseases among cattle in 
 relation to the same. Said committee shall have power to employ a sten- 
 ographer and to send for such persons and papers as may be necessary to 
 accomplish the purpose of such investigation : their report to be made to 
 this legislature as soon as practicable. 
 
 Read and i>assed. 
 
 C. W. TiLUEN, Secretary. 
 
 In House of Repkeskntatives, \ 
 February 12th, 1887. / 
 
 Passed in concurrence. 
 
 Nicholas Fessenden, Clerk. 
 
 .4. 
 
REPORT. 
 
 TIh; iiiulersi;;iioil, ;i iiiajorily t>l Llic comiiiitteo appoiiitod by a Joint 
 ortler of the two FIoiiscs of tin; T.ofifislaiun' to iiivostigato the cause or 
 causes of the late oulbicak of disease am )iii;' tlie cattle at the State Col- 
 lege farm, the loss of other cattle at said farm prior to that time, the dis- 
 posal of the cattle therefrom, and the doings and correspondence of the 
 < 'ommissioners on Contagions Diseases Among Cattle and in relation to 
 the same, have attended to that duty and after several hearings and an 
 exhaustive examination of the facts, beg leave to report, that the disease 
 from which tli(> herd of cattle at the State College farm was sullering in 
 March and April, 1S.S(). was tuberculosis, a disease identical with con- 
 sumption ill the human family; that said disease, according to the evidence 
 introduced before us, which is made a part of this report, is contagious, 
 and readily conuuuuicated by reason of the constant intermingling of the 
 didV'rent animals of a herd together, and is transmittible from citlier parent 
 to its offspring. 
 
 The date and source of the first introduction of the disease into the 
 College herd is unknown, but the evidence tends to disclose that it had 
 existed there for some years, and that it had caused the dt^atli of several 
 cattle on said farm before the slau<rhter of the lierd in April, ISSG. 
 
 The outbreak of said disease there in the winter and spring of 1886 was 
 the most malignant on record, and se(Miis to have been caused by the col- 
 lecting and intermiiigliug of so many cattle, some of which, at least, 
 were diseased in close and well-llnished stables and by the thorough im- 
 pregnation of said stables with contagious virus from those and former 
 diseased animals. I.ittle out-door exercise and concentrated and stimu- 
 lating food were also potent factors in the rapid extension and progress 
 of tlie disease. 
 
 This herd, which appears to have been thoroughly inbred, wliitli fact 
 caused the disease to develop in an unusually severe form. 
 
 The disposal of the cattle from said farm for several years past is shown 
 by the evidence introduced before us and is referretl to. 
 
 The dohigs and correspondence of the Conimissiouers on contagious 
 diseases among the cattle on said farm, are also lierewith submitted in the 
 evidence introduced. The facts seem to fully Justify the destruction of 
 the entire College herd. 
 
In relation to those cattle sokl from the College farm for several years 
 past, if we are allowed by the tei'ms of the order for investigation to make 
 a recommendation, we mnst certainly recommend a most carcfnl examina- 
 tion of those animals, and especially tlie bnlls recently sold therefrom, by 
 a competent board of cattle commissioners, to the end that every vestige 
 of said disease, wherever found, may be stamped out and destroyed. As 
 a committee of this Legislature, we talve no part in any controversy aris- 
 ing out of this matter. Yet we cannot help coming to the conclusion that 
 the Cattle Commissioners have not given such attention to tiiis case as the 
 exigency required, and we respectfully suggest that the existing condition 
 of things may liave grown out of the fact that one of the members of said 
 Commission seems to have held several official positions, tlie duties of 
 wliich were incompatible with each other. 
 
 We malve the majority report of the Cattle Commission, signed by Dr. 
 Bailey and Messrs. Bell and Ferguson, a part of the evidence in this in- 
 vestigation, and, as a consequence, a part of our report, and we respect- 
 fully call attention to the testimony given in said investigation by Dr. J. 
 F. Winchester of Lawrence, Massacliusetts, a member of tlie Cattle Com- 
 mission of Massachusetts, and A. W. Cheevcr of Dedham, Massacliusetts, 
 also a member of said Board, and others. 
 
 The above report is signed by I. C. Libby, who differs from the other 
 members of the Committee in the recommendation of the examination at 
 the State's expense of any apparently well animals and also any rellection 
 on any member of the Cattle Commission. 
 
 Samuel H. Allen, \ Committee on the part 
 Alfred W. Rich, j of the Senate. 
 
 S. J. Walton, ^ Committee on the part 
 Enoch Adams, > . ,i „ jt^„ / 
 
 , ,, -r-ii V o1 the House. 
 
 1. C. Libby, ) 
 
TESTIMONY. 
 
 Wednesday, FgI). 23(1, 1887. 
 
 Leslie C. Cornish, Esq., of Augusta, addressctl the coni- 
 mitteo : 
 
 If you will pardon the iiiti'usion, I will state that Mr. Hall 
 C. Burleigh has asked me to be present at this investigation. 
 The matter under consideration Is one in which he is deeply 
 interested, as it atl'ects the cattle interests of the State. I 
 do not desire to intrude at all, or to interfere with the 
 course of the investigation. I presume that the committee 
 will get at all the material facts, but if, after your examina- 
 tion is completed, any further points may suggest themselves 
 to me, I should like the privilege of inquiring in regard to 
 them. This privilege I hope the committee will accord me. 
 
 Chairman Walton : I have no doubt, Mr. Cornish, that 
 you can have that privilege. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF J. F. WINCHESTER. 
 
 I reside in Lawrence, Mass., and am a veterinary surgeon 
 and one of the P>oard of Cattle Commissioners of Massachu- 
 setts. I have had a little experience with the discnse pleuro- 
 pneumonia and considerable experience with the disease called 
 tuberculosis. Pleuro-pneumonia is highly contagious, charac- 
 terized by lesions of the lung and pleura. It is confined entirely 
 to bovines and has an indefmite period of incubation, varying 
 from two to three weeks to ninety days, but has been know n \n 
 break out after that period. The first notireal>lo symptom of 
 
the disease is an elevation in the temperature and a cough, 
 then the symptoms of ordinary Umg trouble and pleurisy com- 
 bined. Those two are associated. It ditfers from ordinary- 
 pneumonia from the fact that a sul)ject of that disease ordina- 
 rily gets well or dies inside of a fortnight, while in contagions 
 pleuro-pneumonia it will be sometimes as long as eight or ten 
 weeks from the time it begins before resolution takes place, 
 that is, if they get well. A good many die, because it resists 
 most any form of treatment or cure. It has been and is a 
 disease which we fear very much, from the fact that it is so 
 highly contagious and so hard to control, except by the most 
 stringent laws. I do not think they die eft* so quick with this 
 disease as with simple acute pneumonia. I think this disease 
 a little more important than tuberculosis. The characteristic 
 appearance of a lung after death from this disease is a marbled 
 appearance, due to thickening of the cellular tissue between 
 the lobes of each lung, making it have the appearance of mar- 
 ble, not unlike some beef that you see where the fat and the 
 meat are pretty well distributed. I am not so sure that it is 
 not transmitted from the parent to progeny. My experience 
 with the disease is limited. They may have a chronic condi- 
 tion of the disease that will last for years, so that it becomes en- 
 cysted ; then, under favorable circumstances, the cyst breaks 
 and the virus is set free and acts as a source of contao^ion 
 again. 
 
 I have had considerable experience with tuberculosis in the 
 last ten years. My experience and learning tell me that it is 
 both hereditary and contagious. Some authors upon it claim 
 that the contagiousness of it is a sight worse than its danger 
 of being hereditary. I think we are justitied in accepting that 
 to be the case. It is a chronic disease ; that is to say, it is 
 slow in its develojjment. It may exist in an animal her nat- 
 ural life and not be detected, except when dying from some 
 other cause. It may aflect the brain, the lungs, the pleura, 
 the peritoneum, the intestines, the joints, the genitive organs, 
 in fact any organ of the body. There is no question that it 
 
is a disease that is transmitted l)y propasfation. It is not oon- 
 tagious unless the tubercles or tubercular deposit is attached 
 to a mucous membrane, and by atmospheric inHuence it is de- 
 veloped so that it starts the virus and that is taken into the 
 system by some other animal, either by breathing or by diges- 
 tion. It is due to a specific germ which has been propagated 
 and inoculated and the tuberculosis produced. It is identical 
 to the disease in man, tul)erculosis. It may be carried from 
 man to a bovine, and, I think there is evidence now to show, 
 from bovine to man. That is a pretty hard thing to prove, 
 because there have been no experiments to that effect. I said 
 it was contagious when it affected the mucous membrane, be- 
 cause all mucous membranes are exposed to the atmosphere. 
 The serous meml)rane is one that is not exposed, and therefore 
 if the disease affects that there is no danger of its escaping to 
 any other animal. It may affect the milk of a cow. It is not 
 invariably transmitted from parent to progeny. There are 
 instances on record where a tubercular animal has delivered 
 healthy offspring, and they remained healthy through their 
 life. Whether those animals transmitted it to the second 
 generation, I do not know, Imt it has been known to skip one 
 generation and be reproduced in the next. The probabilities 
 are that the offspring will be affected. I have found that to 
 be the case a number of times. I have had three generations 
 on the same farm, mother, daughter and grand-daughter. 
 Think there was a herd of ten on that fiirm and two cases of 
 the disease on that one farm ; but the mother of those two 
 had been sold. There were three out of the ten affected. That 
 is a very recent occurrence. Some eight or nine years ago I 
 was called to a ftirm and found a cow with tuberculosis among 
 a herd of forty or fifty. I had her killed and I have not been 
 called there since. I had a case of the disease in an imported 
 cow which had been on the farm a week before she was taken 
 sick and died. I inquired about the offspring of this cow und 
 could not get any instances or indications of the disease. The 
 breakinET down of the tissue had not occurred in her <:iso, and 
 
8 
 
 that is probably the reason why none were affected. She was 
 three or four years old. She could not have given the dis- 
 ease to the other animals while in that condition. You must 
 have the germ, the virus, set free to get the tubercles. That 
 does not occur until the breaking down of the tissue holding 
 it. A consumptive cow may throw a healthy calf, and it may 
 not. I think the largest per cent of tuljercular animals are 
 past five yejw's. It is a chronic disease in the beginning and 
 does not develop rapidly. If a cow is diseased and the udder 
 is not art'ected I do not think you would have any trouble about 
 using the .milk. The udder is at times specially affected. It 
 is generally accej)ted that until there is a breaking down of 
 this membrane, unless the lymphatics are highly diseased, the 
 beef is a fair quality, kind of second quality beef; that is, if 
 there is not too much disease of the lymphatic glands. Ofii- 
 cially we have never done anything in regard to the isolation 
 and quarantining of tuberculosis in Massachusetts, because we 
 have never been called to but one case since I have been on 
 the Board, a year ago last October. 
 
 Q. Whether you find it often at the slaughter-houses in 
 Massachusetts where they are slaughtering cattle for beef. 
 
 A. I saw a letter written by a gentleman who had been at 
 a hearing at the State House on this subject, and he made a 
 strong statement, — that of these old cows, "skates" I believe 
 he called them, there was hardly one that did not have some 
 evidences of the disease. He was not a professional man, 
 and I do not know what right he had to make that statement. 
 He said he did not think there was a herd of twenty cows in 
 all Massachusetts but what had it. But I do not believe that. 
 I do not consider it a prevailing disease. Every animal I 
 have condemned I have seen opened. The general appear- 
 ance of the animals was some fat and some lean. The condi- 
 tion of the fiesh depends a good deal upon what tissues are 
 involved. The lungs of one animal, particularly, when we 
 took off the muscles on the bottom of the caul, the periton- 
 eum, we found lots of little seeds, called tubercles, completely 
 
covering that, and the intestines themselves were filled with 
 the tubercles, also the lymphatic gland filled with them, — all 
 in different stages of life. You will often find these deposits 
 in the liver, the lungs, in the joints, sometimes in the brain, 
 in the spinal cord. These tubercles have the appearance of 
 little gray beans, like seed, and hitch on to the serous mem- 
 brane of the lungs, and sometimes the pleura; they then 
 grow together and become a large mass. When they first 
 start they are little meaty sui)stances like warts. In the first 
 stages you get a thickening of your tissues, which is grayish 
 in color, and then it grows, not very large, about the size of 
 a millet seed ; then they grow together and i)ecome soft in 
 appearance. After a while they get hard, so that they grit 
 the knife in cutting ; and then again they suppurate and break 
 down. Usually this is very slow in its development. If the 
 lung is aflected the creature usually has a cough. The ci-eat- 
 ure must have some deposit in her bronchial tubes caused by 
 this tubercular growth before the cough comes on. A cow 
 could have a cough for a great many years from some cause 
 and live. I should not expect to find ordinarily some disease 
 in the lung of every creature afiectcd with tuberculosis. You 
 would lind some cases where the lungs would be entirely free. 
 The disease causes lameness of the joints sometimes. This 
 outbreak in Orono was the most rank of any that I ever knew 
 or read of. What 1 know of this is gained by reading. It is 
 the mott virulent case I have ever known. So far as the milk 
 is concerned, I do not think there is any doubt that the milk 
 contained the germ of tuberculosis if the udders wi-re dis- 
 eased. 
 
 Q. Suppose the udder was not diseased? 
 
 A. That is a question I would not answer in but one wa}'. 
 I think the probabilities are that the disease, as it existed 
 there, aflected the milk itself in the last stagfes. 
 
 Q. Tell us if, in the first four or five years of this disease, 
 when the animal's udder was in good shape, all right and 
 
10 
 
 healthy-looking in appearance, the milk would be good or 
 not ? 
 
 A. I would not recommend its use. I do not think the 
 milk is healthy in tubercular animals in the last stages. If 
 you start in with a good deal of disease I do not think the milk 
 would be desirable. 
 
 Q. If you were called in a case and condemned a cow 
 which unmistakably had this disease, would you recommend 
 to the people of Maine to follow out the progeny of that cow 
 clear down to the second or third generation, whether appar- 
 ently well or not ? 
 
 A. That has been my practice in individual cases. Of 
 course, officially we do not do it. That is, we have not done 
 it. 
 
 Q. Do you take them well, and kill them? 
 
 A. No, sir. I should kill the first one, and if I got stuck on 
 that I would be a little careful with the next one. I should 
 consider the milk in such attacks as at Orono dangerous to 
 use. 
 
 Q. In so much as these germs are destroyed by heat, and 
 milk is more often taken without being heated than any other 
 part oi" the creature, in so much greater degree would the 
 danger be ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. By digestion this identical disease could be 
 thus transmitted to a human being. The disease can be pro- 
 duced in man by feeding it to consumptive people. I do not 
 understand that feeding has anything to do with this disease. 
 I understand that poorly fed animals would be in as great 
 danger from it as highly fed animals. You have to have the 
 germ. If, as in the case under consideration, some ten or 
 fifteen animals had a case of tuberculosis, they would be more 
 likely to have it in close quarters, because the closer the quar- 
 ters the more chance to breathe the expired air. Each might 
 have the disease, and if kept in an airy place would live a 
 long life to old age. The disease is transmitted to man by 
 the germ, the bacilli, getting into the system either through 
 
11 
 
 the digestive organs or the respiratory organs, or abrasions 
 of tlie skin, — an>' way that will cause the virus to y)e al)sorhed 
 into tiie l)h)0(l of the individual. One way is by drinking the 
 milk of such animals. I cannot tell you whether an animal 
 sometimes has the disease without affecting the milk at all. I 
 would not recommend the drinkmg of milk from an animal 
 having the disease. If the disease of the lymphatics had not 
 advanced far enough, or there were not in that body any well- 
 developed tubercles, I do not think the beef would be dan- 
 gerous. That you cannot tell until after the animal is killed. 
 
 Q. And it was on that basis that you made this recom- 
 mendation in your last report to the Massachusetts Legisla- 
 ture : "The milk and beef of any animals in any stage of 
 this disease should be proscribed, as it is transmittible to 
 man." And those are your sentiments? 
 
 A. Yes sir. The largest percentage of these diseased an- 
 imals are found above live years. 
 
 Q. What are the symptoms of disease before that time — 
 from two to four years ? 
 
 A. You would have a cough, — that is usually the first 
 symptom ; you might have a staring look, an unhealthy ap- 
 pearance of the skin, a lameness, or from very careful obser- 
 vation you would find some of the lymphatic glands on the 
 outside enlarged. A cough is not a necessary part of the 
 disease. The disease can exist in other parts of the body 
 without the cough. I deem it wise to crush the disease out 
 as fast as it can be located. I think it a dangerous disease 
 among cattle, and, more or less, the human race. I have 
 heard considerable about the case at Orono and have kept run 
 of it. 
 
 Q. There was a herd of 51 animals, and 40 were found to 
 have this disease in one stage or another. AV^ould you have 
 deemed it prudent to scatter those animals or any of them 
 among the farmers of this State for use? 
 
 A. On general principles I would not; but if there was a 
 contract entered into to supply them it might be a ditt'erent 
 
12 
 
 matter. On general principles I do not think it would be a 
 wise thing to do. It is a pretty hard question to answer 
 whether the action of the Commissioners was wise or not in 
 causing the cattle at Orono to be killed as they were. If I 
 had found a herd at our State College in the same condition I 
 should have made the same recommendation. 
 
 Q. Supposing you had a mother of a bull calf killed, and 
 it was found to be in this condition, — lungg loaded with de- 
 posits of virus, large abscesses in cavities, l)ronchial glands 
 greatly enlarged, age eight years. Is that, or not, an ad- 
 vanced stage? 
 
 A. It is. I would expect a calf dropped by that cow to 
 have the same tendency. There is a pre-disposition to it, 
 hereditarily. I would not deem it advisable to use that calf 
 for breeding purposes. With my individual clients I have 
 recommended that such calves be killed. The disease can be 
 transmitted from the bull just the same. 
 
 il. If you found that in a herd of 49, 47 were found to 
 have this disease, and you learned that 11 bull calves had 
 been sold to various people about the State, coming from this 
 herd, would you, or not, recommend the killing of those bull 
 calves'? 
 
 A. I think I should. I should deem that a wise and pru- 
 dent thing, necessary for the safety of the herds of the State. 
 
 Q. In regard to this College herd : if they had been situ- 
 ated up there at Lawrence, and some fellow would come there 
 and give the College $1,500 for them and put them on an 
 island, would you not have advised them to be sold? 
 
 A. I have been in the same position and told them to kill 
 the cattle. I should consider it great danger to have those 
 cattle shipped from one part of the State to another. I have 
 been in just that position, and it was my strong recommenda- 
 tion not to let those cattle go. I have seen the man in the 
 barn with the money in his hand to pay for them, and still 
 would not let the cattle ffo. 
 
13 
 
 Q. NoAV, in rcgartl to this hull calf: you say you would 
 recommcncl that animal should not ho used for hioedin<^ pur- 
 poses ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. If that animal was the father of 100 calves, part heifers 
 and part hulls, would you recommend that those 100 calves 
 1)0 used for hrecding purposes? 
 
 A. I have never seen it traced down that far ; hut I should 
 like to know how it would work. I think the tendency would 
 he that it would propagate itself. 
 
 Q. Would you recommend that these 100 calves should he 
 picked up all over the State and slaughtered, — the hull in ap- 
 parent good health ? 
 
 A. If the mothers of these 100 calves were rugged cows, 
 I would take my chances of their overcoming the tendency 
 to propagate the disease from the bull, on account of the dis- 
 tance it had gone from the bull's mother, — if the mothers of 
 the calves were in no way related to the mother of the bull. 
 If the bull was killed and found to he troubled with that dis- 
 ease I should recommend the destroying of the whole of the 
 100 calves. I think you would iind the disease in some of the 
 calves ; but by the time you killed 50 and did not find it you 
 would want to go slower. If the hull is apjiarently well and 
 strong, that does not argue that he has not the disease. If this 
 hull is apparently well now, it develops after that age. If 
 this bull was killed and found healthy, then I would let the 
 progeny take their chances, and let them live ; but if I found 
 him diseased, then I should expect to Hud his progeny dis- 
 eased. I have killed apparently well animals and found them 
 diseased. An animal has never been known to recover from 
 the disease. The milk heated to a boiling point will kill these 
 germs. 
 
 Q. Have you heard any complaint, or of any trouble, either 
 from doctors or anybody else, as to milk from these diseased 
 cows being poisonous or hurtful? 
 
14 
 
 A. I think I know of one caiie, where a man who had h)ng 
 been troubled with, and family died of, phthisis. I know I 
 was called to see his cow, and she had a tuberculous udder. 
 He was living on milk altogether, but he had plenty of money 
 and had kept himself going by special treatment, and luxuries, 
 &c. He ultimately went under. I don't know but what it 
 may have been a coincidence ; but I should attribute it U) the 
 milk of the cow. Tuberculosis had developed in the udder 
 of the cow. That is not infrequent. You often say a cow 
 has the garget, and it may be really an enlargement of the 
 lymphatic glands from tubercular development. Sometimes 
 it is hard to dissipate those swellings, and then suspicion is 
 aroused, because an ordinary case of garget runs away quite 
 soon. I think an ordinary gargetty inflammation of the udder 
 is often mistaken for tuberculosis, and in a good many cases 
 where it is thought to be garget the inflammation is due to 
 tuberculosis. I think there are more cases than we are aware 
 of on that account. 
 
 Q. What is the ditterence in the milk where the cow has the 
 tuberculosis and where she has the garget? 
 
 A. The appearance of the milk depends a great deal. If 
 the tuberculosis is in the tirst stages, before the breaking down 
 of the tissue, you would not notice any physical difference in 
 the milk, ordinarily, without microscopicalexamination, while 
 in a case of garget, as you well know, there is a marked 
 physical diflerence in the character of the milk. After the 
 tubercles had broken down, the milk would be similar in gen- 
 eral appearance to ordinary gargetty milk. In such cases it 
 is highly poisonous. 
 
 Q. How about the milk previous to the breaking down of 
 the tissue? 
 
 A. It is poisonous at that time. 
 
 Q. Is it in the incipient stages of the disease? 
 
 A. If the udder is aflfected in the beginning I do not see 
 why the milk should not be. I think they could have the 
 
15 
 
 disease in ccrUiin portions of the body, without the milk being 
 aflccted at all. 
 
 Q. There is no danger from taking the disease from a cough 
 until the tubercles in the lungs break down, is there? 
 
 A. Well, I don't know. If the cough is due to some irrita- 
 tion of the bronchial tubes, and the irritation of the bronchial 
 tubes is due to an exudation that throws the germ off*, you can 
 just as well get it then as to wait for the tubercles. Generally 
 there is little danger until the tubercles break down. By 
 coughing the animal might throw out some of the virus. j„^i 
 
 Q. Now if the tubercles in the udder have not commenced 
 to break down, or up to the time of the breaking down, there 
 is not much danger from the milk? 
 
 A. I should think there was, because the milk is a natural 
 secretion i'rom the blood, and the blood contains more or less 
 of that trouble. 
 
 Q. If four bulls were brought here of the first generation 
 of the cattle that were killed, ranging from two to four years 
 old, and they are slaughtered and no signs of tuberculosis 
 are found in them, does that argue necessarily that the others 
 are not affected? 
 
 A. No, sir, it does not. 
 
 Q. Well, notwithstanding the fact that it shows itself some- 
 times in the second generation, you would not take the chances 
 of killing the descendants of those bulls, if you found them 
 in a healthy condition ? 
 
 A. No, sir. 
 
 Q. We understand you that it is not always hereditary? 
 
 A. No, sir; there are exceptions. 
 
 Q. My point is that, being at the age they are, they might 
 not, if killed now, show symptoms of the disease ; and at a 
 later period in life these same animals might exhibit signs of 
 the disease? 
 
 A. That is it exactly. 
 
16 
 
 Q. Would there be as much clanger to bleed from animids 
 that do not show any signs now of disease as it would be 
 later on after the disease is developed? 
 
 A. I don't think there would he so much danger. 
 
 Q. Do 3'ou think it would be wise to breed from them? 
 
 A. No, sir ; I should not, on general principles, as I said at 
 the start. 
 
 Q. It is impossible to say which one of these bulls will 
 show, and which will not, without a post-mortem examina- 
 tion, indications of the disease? 
 
 A. You might have some physical examination, but it 
 would be safer to have a post-mortem one. 
 
 Q. Could you tell by a physical examination in a mild 
 case ? 
 
 A. No, sir. 
 
 Q. We understand from what you say that these bulls are 
 not necessarily diseased? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Now, when can you determine whether an animal has 
 got the tuberculosis ; in what stage has it g(jt to be before 
 you can determine? 
 
 A. You have got to have disease of the lymphatic glands ; 
 they are external. 
 
 Q. Suppose the lungs are diseased? 
 
 A. In that case you cannot always tell. 
 
 Q. How far must it be advanced? 
 
 A. You must have enough so that it interferes with the 
 respiration. There might be one or two tubercles on the 
 lungs that it would take an acute ear to discover by any 
 change in the respiration. 
 
 Q. How about percussion? 
 
 A. You do not get much change by percussion. 
 
 Q. Would you suppose that those animals or any portion 
 of them take this trouble by contagion ? 
 
 A. It is natural to infer that they do. 
 
 Q. Would the fact that some of these cows were found to 
 have tuberculosis at the time they were killed argue that 
 
17 
 
 they must have the disease at the time they dropped calves, 
 three or four j'ears before? 
 
 A. IL dous not necessarily follow. 
 
 Q. Would you think tubercles niis^ht develop in one year? 
 
 A. I should think so ; ordinarily three or four months. 
 
 Q. Notwithstanding these eleven bulls came out of those 
 diseased cows that were killed two or three years later, they 
 might have been well when the calves were dropped ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. I suppose that would depend a good deal on the stage 
 of the disease at the time those cows were killed. I judge 
 there is no rule to tell how long the disease was in existence ? 
 
 A. That is it. You have got to have very slow develop- 
 ing tubercles in the lung before you can tell anything in the 
 respiration; and you must have a good many and quite 
 largely developed. 
 
 Q. Didn't you state that the probabilities were largely in 
 favor of their having the disease, from the fact of their com- 
 ing from these diseased animals, whether those animals 
 apparently or not had the disease when they were dropped? 
 
 A. I don't know. 
 
 Q. And we understand you to say that the cows were not 
 necessarily diseased from two to four years previous to the 
 outbreak of the disease ? 
 
 A. Not necessarily. 
 
 Q. This condition of things, I think you have said, could 
 come inside of two years ? 
 
 A. It is a slow thing ordinarily, but once in a while takes 
 a quick turn. 
 
 Q. Can you tell us the reason why it takes that quick turn ? 
 
 A. I suppose the natural condition of the animal has a 
 great deal to do with it ; some are more susceptible to the 
 action of the virus than others. You can get this virus in the 
 animal and it will not develop the disease, because he has a 
 constitution to throw it oft'; but if he is weak and predisposed 
 
18 
 
 that way, it will run its course. An animal of strong consti- 
 tution misfht take the virus and not take the disease. 
 
 Q. Have you read the report and become acquainted sub- 
 stantially wuth the facts, so as to give your opinion as to how 
 many years tuberculosis has existed at the State College ? 
 
 A. No, sir. 
 
 Q. How long has it existed in Massachusetts? 
 
 A. Well, Mr. Cheever has told you that it was at Amherst 
 12 years ago. I do not know. My idea is it has existed for 
 about 13 years. 
 
 Q. Now, here is a linthole in the barn, with four places of 
 ventilation on one side, — that ventilator runs up the sides of 
 the barn to the eaves, where it goes out under the eaves, — 
 would there be any danger from the snow melting on that 
 roof and running into the cistern, and the cattle drinking 
 that water ? 
 
 A. That is to say, the contamination from the animals would 
 go up and become absorbed in the snow and then come down 
 again in water. No, sir, I don't think it would. 
 
 Q. I would like your opinion on that. 
 
 A. It would really depend a good deal on how much draft 
 you had there. If there was a good deal of draft, I do not 
 believe it would have any effect at all. In fact, I don't believe 
 it would any way. 
 
 Q. There are lots of citizens in this State who would like to 
 know whether cotton-seed meal fed to the stock would have 
 anything to do with this disease ? 
 
 A. Hot climates are good for tuberculosis, but I don't be- 
 lieve it grows in the cotton-field, and therefore I don't think 
 cotton-seed meal has anything to do with it. 
 
 Q. How would you account for the rapid spread of the 
 trouble in that particular herd ? 
 
 A. I think, from what I know of it, that the lung tissues 
 were so broken down, and so much virus escaped from each 
 animal, it was the center of contagion, and the animals being 
 well bred, closely bred, — the finer bred the animal, the less 
 
19 
 
 strong his constitution, — the virus got to work pretty fast, 
 there being so much of it. 
 
 Q. Would there not be pretty good chance for the spread 
 of the disease in the herd from the animals drinking out of the 
 same trough ? 
 
 A. Yes, they could get the disease that way, because it 
 works just as rapidly in the digestive organs as in the respira- 
 tory organs. 
 
 Q. Don't you think that this disease had probably existed 
 there for several years ? 
 
 A. My inference would be that it existed there some time. 
 
 Q. I would like to ask whether the feeding of cotton-seed 
 meal to cattle diseased in this way would have a tendency to 
 hasten the result? 
 
 A. No, sir. 
 
 Q. Is it necessary that an animal should have tuberculosis 
 developed in the lungs, in order to transmit it to the young? 
 
 A. No, sir. You may have the disease confined entirely 
 to the genitive organs. 
 
 Q. Must it be developed in any place in the system? 
 
 A. It can suit itself about its location. It is not confined 
 to any organs. 
 
 Q. Must the disease have any stage of development in the 
 animal in order to transmit to the young? 
 
 A. I don't know what the exact period of incubation is. 
 
 Q. I want to get at whether there is a constitutional pro- 
 clivity to transmit, without the tubercles existing? 
 
 A. Yes ; there is a predisposition in all animals closely 
 bred for something or other. 
 
 Q. I suppose the disease first exists in the blood ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir; and it locates itself anywhere. 
 
 Q. The question is whether it could be transmitted while 
 simply existing in the blood without being located? 
 
 A. That, sir, I could not sa}'. 
 
 Q. Is it similar to consumption in people? 
 
 A. It is identical. 
 
20 
 
 Q. Well, you find parents dying with consumption, and 
 children never having it ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Can you tell any nearer in the disease in an animal than 
 you can in a man ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Is the action of the disease in the bovine similar to that 
 in the man ? 
 
 A. Identical. 
 
 Q. What can you say about recommending the destruction 
 of animals after three or four years? 
 
 A. The only recommendation I have made is that they be 
 killed, because thus far my observation has been that it has 
 been handed down from generation to generation, and I have 
 been justified in killing their progeny, but I knew that those 
 animals were diseased when their progeny came along. I 
 never had any occasion to test it where they were dropped 
 before the disease exhibited itself. 
 
 Q. Would you not make a greater distinction in the work- 
 ings of this disease in the animal, than you would in the 
 human race ? Is there not a greater tendency to enlargement 
 of the glands, and greater deposits. 
 
 A. I don't know much about the pathology of man, but I 
 say the disease is identical to that in man. I supposed the 
 workings would be the same. 
 
 Q. I understood you to say there was much more danger 
 of contagion on account of difference in habits of the ani- 
 mals and the human race ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. I think a good many of these questions have been mis- 
 leading. It has been asked here if a bull that came out of a 
 cow from two to four years old might not have been bred 
 from a healthy cow. The facts are these. The mother of 
 these bulls was killed and found diseased, and their off-sp'ring 
 from two to four years killed at the same time and every one 
 found to be diseased. 
 
21 
 
 A. If the ojff-spring of these cows killed were found to be 
 diseased, and they were older than the bull now living or 
 were ut least within six or nine months of his age, I should 
 recommend the destruction of this bull. 
 
 Q. If the ofi-spring of these animals remained with that 
 herd, does it necessarily follow that those who went out from 
 the herd about two to four years before were diseased? 
 
 A. No, sir. 
 
 Q. One of those animals that was bred from a diseased 
 animal does not have the disease. Now, is it possible that 
 that animal, though the disease is not developed at all, may 
 transmit it to its progeny ? 
 
 A. I understand ; that is the question I have answered 
 that I did not know. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF A. W. CHEEVER. 
 
 I am a farmer by education, now connected with a news- 
 paper and on the Cattle Commission of Massachusetts for a 
 year and a little over. I have never seen a case of tubercu- 
 losis in a dead animal. My knowledge of it is by reading 
 and being taught. Before coming here I inquired of Pro- 
 fessor Stockbridge, who has been on the Commission nearly 
 since its organization — 20 years, more or less — in regard to 
 the disease as it has developed itself at the College farm in 
 Massachusetts, and that is about all I know of the disease 
 practically. It was introduced on the College farm there in 
 some Short-horn cattle, I think, about 11 years ago. There 
 were, Professor Stockbridge tells me, at different times about 
 sixty Short-horn cattle on the farm, and some 4 or half a 
 dozen of the whole number, at one time, exhibited evidences 
 of the disease. At one time 2 or 3 Ayrshire cattle gave evi- 
 dences of the disease, whether taking it from the Short-horns 
 or bringing it there themselves originally, I do not know. 
 Two or three sales or disposals were made from this farm. 
 Short-horns and Ayrshires, and afterwards a few were found to 
 be diseased. One, supposed to be all right, except that she 
 
22 
 
 refused to breed, was sent to the butcher and killed, and was 
 found to have the disease in the internal organs. Two Ayrshires 
 were sold off of the premises, and soon after, or at some 
 time after, developed the disease ; and they were destroyed 
 or killed. The strong point that Professor Stockbridge 
 wished to make, on the conservative side of the question, 
 was that the disease had never spread in the herd beyond the 
 first animals attacked ; it had never spread outside of the 
 college herd into the two herds into which were sold animals 
 that had been diseased, and in which the disease developed 
 while they were in those herds. 
 
 Q. Would you go to the herds which had among them the 
 progeny of any of these diseased cattle, and kill them, down 
 to the second, third or fourth generation? 
 
 A. I do not feel familiar enough with the workings of 
 this disease to lay down the rule of action. Think we have 
 had it in Massachusetts 11 years to my knowledge. On gen- 
 eral principles, with a willing State to back it up, I would 
 say weed out every imperfection in all animals and vegetables, 
 and every thing the farm raises ; but with public sentiment 
 not educated up to that point, the question comes in, where 
 is the money coming from? I should not feel that at the 
 present time in our State we would dare to recommend killing 
 and destroying everything that had been exposed to what we 
 supposed is that disease. I consider the disease, according 
 to ray reading, contagious — something as glanders is. It 
 would be a very cheap experiment, and worth the trial, to 
 select four of the most suspicious animals that have gone out 
 from this college herd and slaughter them. If they were all 
 found to be diseased I would begin to examine their progeny 
 if I could find them. The disease is known as a hereditary 
 and contagious one, and a dangerous one among cattle. That 
 is what a part of the authorities say. 
 
 Q. You heard read to your associate the condition in which 
 the mother of a certain bull was found when killed — lungs 
 loaded with deposits, etc. What would you recommend to 
 be done with a bull dropped by that cow ? 
 
A. I would recommend the killing of him. 
 
 Q. What would you recommend as to the 11 other bulls 
 dropped by other members of the herd there, from diseased 
 mothers ? 
 
 A. I do not see why we should not treat them all alike. I 
 think I should recommend the killing of those eleven. Very 
 likely that would be the wisest and cheapest course for the 
 State to take. It would be liable to save a great expense to 
 the people of the State in the future. 
 
 Q. Supposing the bulls were calved from a year and a half 
 to four years before any knowledge of disease among those 
 cows was had by anybody in attendance, any one connected 
 with the animals : would you recommend Ihoir destruction? 
 
 A. I should recommend examining and killing some of 
 them, as the State is able to do it. 
 
 Q. For what purpose ? 
 
 A. To study the disease. 
 
 Q. Would your commission recommend their destruction 
 in such cases, as a commission? 
 
 A. AVe have not done it yet, or anything like it. 
 
 Q. Have you known of any commission that has recom- 
 mended or practiced that system of killing apparently sound 
 animals? 
 
 A. No, sir. I do not know of any laws this side of Ger- 
 many looking to that extreme action. We have never had a 
 case in Massachusetts that I know of anywhere approaching 
 the rankness of the case at Orono. 
 
 Q. Don't you think it would be dangerous to have those 
 eleven bulls scattered over this State, with the pre-disposition 
 to tuberculosis in them which they must have? 
 
 A. There is certainly a possibilit3^ There is more proba- 
 bility that they will be dangerous than that they will not be. 
 If I found in a herd of cattle of mine one case of tubercu- 
 losis I do not think I should immediately go at work and 
 destroy the whole herd. Think I should kill none but the 
 diseased one. Speaking as a fiirmer, and supposing under 
 certain conditions that the meat would be wholesome, I should 
 
24 
 
 try to get the most out of the diseased one that I could. If 
 he was fit for beef I should kill him, and if not fit I would 
 kill him anyhow. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF DR. A. R. G. SMITH. 
 
 I have been one of the members of Governor Robie's 
 Council for the last two years. I went to the College farm 
 and saw the cattle before they were slaughtered, but not 
 after. From statements to me I found the herd losing flesh. 
 Nearly all of them were kept on the same feed ; very many 
 of them had a dull-looking color, hair dead ; a portion of 
 the herd had a bad cough. I examined those most diseased, 
 and found the lungs quite dull on percussion and the respira- 
 tion bad, with every indication of tuberculosis as you will 
 find it in human beings. In my practice as a physician I am 
 acquainted with those indications in the human family. I 
 found the same indications there in that herd. Nearly all of 
 the herd showed more or less signs of the disease. Some 12 
 or 13 were quite diseased, although I examined particularly 
 only two. Those two I found as I have stated, with some 
 indications of hectic fever. They were cows. I was there 
 March 23d. I do not consider consumption in the human 
 family particularly contagious. I consider it hereditary. If 
 persons are advancing to death with the disease, and you take 
 their breath, as you naturally would do in sleeping with them, 
 I should look upon it as contagious. You most always find 
 the nurse who takes care of a consumptive to be afllicted 
 with a cough, even if they do not get the germ seated in 
 their system and die from it. I have seen healthy persons 
 who have been companions of consumptives frequently follow 
 them into consumption. 
 
 Q. So if the opportunities were as good to take it from 
 person to person, as it is from cattle to cattle, through their 
 eating from the same manger, drinking from the same tank, 
 you would expect it to be terribly contagious in the human 
 race? 
 
25 
 
 A. I should. I would not advise for the human family the 
 use of milk of cows that I had any suspicion were affected 
 with the disease in any stage. My knowledge of this disease 
 among cattle is not very great, but my view is that it is pre- 
 cisely the same as the disease in the human race. I hadacasethis 
 summer where a consumptive mother transmitted the disease 
 to her child by nursing it. The child lived about 6 months 
 longer than its mother. Children born of consumptive 
 mothers in my practice and experience have been puny, and 
 have grown up in that condition if they have lived ; the 
 majority of them died. I think the taint is in the blood and 
 may skip one or two generations without making itself man- 
 ifest. I think tuberculosis is dangerous among cattle in this 
 way : I think it is apt to crop out from one generation to 
 another, and spread itself in that way. I would not recom- 
 mend the use of beef from animals that had this disease. I 
 approve of the policy of the destruction of the entire herd, 
 and also of the policy of the college in not selling any butter, 
 milk or beef from that herd after the disease was discovered. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF GILBERT M. GO WELL. 
 
 I reside at Orono on the State College farm. Have been 
 on that farm 4 years last April. I have had the care of the stock 
 in question during that time. Think it was in November, 
 '85, that I first discovered any apparent signs of disease among 
 the herd. Think in all there were 46 in the herd at that 
 time. Think there were 26 cows and 2 bulls. The rest were 
 young, heifers and bulls, except two steers, too young to 
 come into milk. Sixteen were imported Jerseys and 16 
 Maine State Jerseys ; 8 were Short-horns. During the time 
 I was there we lost cattle from other disease than this. 
 April 26, '83, we lost one Jersey cow. She was ailing for a 
 few weeks. We thought it rheumatism at first, and called 
 Dr. Wild, a practicing veterinarian of Bangor, and he was 
 not able to decide the trouble. He found all the organs in 
 their usual condition with the exception of the spleen, and 
 
26 
 
 that was slightly shrivelled. He was unable to tell what the 
 cause of it was. November, '83, we lost the cow Bess during 
 the time of parturition. That was wholly a local cause — 
 inversion of the uterus. October, '84, we lost the cow called 
 Maggie, the one I spoke of to Dr. Bailey as having a cough 
 when I went to the farm in the spring of '82. She did not have 
 the cough up to the time of her death ; after that, in the spring, 
 she became well of the cough, improved very much in appear- 
 ance, and shortly after came into milk, milking the heaviest 
 the next year of any cow in the herd. Nearly 2 years later 
 she ran down and became very much reduced, though no cough 
 was present. We slaughtered and buried her. We examined her. 
 I have no knowled2:e of the disease of which she died. She had 
 no cough again until her last sickness, then it came back on her. 
 We had no examination of her by a veterinarian. I never 
 discovered anything about her to locate any disease. Up to 
 her last sickness she ate heartily. She was the only cow in 
 the herd that could consume 20 pounds of hay in a day. 
 Afterwards I learned the symptoms of tuberculosis, after the 
 herd became infected with it. Looking back now, I think 
 the cough that the cow Maggie had was very similar to the 
 low cough that our other animals had in the years later ; and 
 the loss of flesh Avas quite similar. She had that cough when 
 I went there, and it continued not more than 2 or 2 1-2 
 months. Mr. Rich stated that she had had it before that 
 time. After she got well of it she did not have it again until 
 her last sickness, not to my knowledge. W^e next lost stock 
 about February 7, '85. A Short-horn cow had failed to 
 breed and had not carried a calf for more than a year, and 
 we sold her for beef to a party in Bangor. She had no cough. 
 Within a few days he notified me that the cow was in a very 
 bad condition, which he described. He said she was "covered 
 with bunches inside," as he expressed it. His statement was 
 that there were bunches attached to her back and ribs, to the 
 meat, as well as to the lungs. As he described it, she was 
 completely filled up with bunches and a mass of matter. I 
 did not see her. I knew the man and did not doubt his state- 
 
27 
 
 ment. The meat was worth 2 cents a pound for feeding 
 to hogs and the hide was worth something, and I paid back 
 one half of the money loss. The cow was fat and I had 
 never noticed any cough. I had not noticed any indications 
 of disease. She had refused to breed although she was 
 brought many times to the bull. We next lost the Jersey 
 Lilly from the stock. She was something over two years old. 
 She had a calf about that time. She Avith several other young 
 animals had stift* necks, and I supposed at the time that it 
 arose from feeding over a rather high manger. She had a 
 bunch on her jaw, or right at the throat, — it was not attached 
 to the jaw. It was quite a large swelling, and I opened it; 
 it discharged soniewhat. About this time she had a calf and 
 she continued to lose ground so much that we slaughtered 
 and buried her. I did not examine her to see what the trouble 
 was. I supposed the trouble was still local. I should say 
 the calf when we killed the mother was two or three weeks 
 old. It was not thrifty, so we simply slaughtered it and laid 
 it away too. 
 
 Q. How many of the young cattle were troubled with 
 enlarged glands, a swelling about the neck? 
 
 A. I think there were four, — three heifers and one bull. 
 They were tied on one side of the barn and fed from mangers 
 constructed for older animals. They all stood together and 
 were a fleeted in the same way with the stift' necks. I sup- 
 posed it was the manger, and reduced it. 
 
 Q. Was there any change for the better then ? 
 
 A. With two of them there was, with the other two I 
 think there was not. 
 
 Q. When next did you lose any stock? 
 
 A. November, 1885. 
 
 Q. Before or after you discovered tuberculosis in the herd ? 
 
 A. Before we discovered it. The cow that I spoke of as 
 coughing in the fall of 1885 was coughing at this time, 
 November, when we lost those two young heifers, or slaught- 
 ered them, rather. These are two of the young heifers that 
 
28 
 
 had stiff necks. We slaughtered one in November and one 
 in December. 
 
 Q. Did you examine those two ? 
 
 A. No, sir ; any further than the others. 
 
 Q. What did you find with regard to the throats of those 
 animals? 
 
 A. That the glands were somewhat swollen. That was all 
 the trouble we discovered at the throat, but there was a tend- 
 ency to carry the head to one side. 
 
 Q. Was there not some other appearance of disease about 
 those cattle ? 
 
 A. There was a reduction of flesh. 
 
 Q. Then the indication was that there was some other dis- 
 ease besides the swelling of the glands? You did not regard 
 that as a trouble that would reduce the heifers to the condi- 
 tion where you were obliged to kill them ? 
 
 A. I did not know how much they were troubled with that 
 neck trouble. 
 
 Q. They were running sores ? 
 
 A. No, sir. One of them lost flesh. 
 
 Q. Were their lungs examined ? 
 
 A. They were not. 
 
 Q. You say only one of them lost flesh ? 
 
 A. Only one of those slaughtered in the fall of 1885. 
 
 Q. Why did you slaughter the other one, if the trouble 
 was simply an enlargement of the glands and she was in good 
 condition ? 
 
 A. From the fact that her neck was stiff as the other one's 
 was, I feared it would result in the same way. She was not 
 growing, was not thriving, but had not yet become poor as 
 the other one had. 
 
 Q. Had you not called in any one at that time to make an 
 examination ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. In the spring, at the time the Jersey heifer 
 was slaughtered, I called upon the veterinarian in Bangor and 
 gave him the condition of these animals. He thought it 
 might have arisen from the cause I attributed it to, and told 
 
29 
 
 me to apply iodine and treat them. I did so, and two of 
 them, a heifer and a bull, seemed to recover under the treat- 
 ment. The others did not, although we used it freely. In 
 the fiill he was called to the farm to see another cow, and 
 saw these animals at that time. He then was of the same 
 opinion that he was in the spring, that it arose from feeding 
 from the high manger. That was while these two animals 
 were in the barn. 
 
 Q. This was in November, 1885 ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. How soon after that did you discover that there was 
 tuberculosis in the herd? 
 
 A. In October or November, 1885, the cow Betsey was 
 coughing slightly. The cough continued to increase during 
 the winter, and she lost flesh and became so reduced that she 
 was slaughtered, as we found her recovery was very doubt- 
 ful. She lost ground very rapidly after she had the young 
 calf. I think she was slaughtered the last of January. Her 
 lungs were found to be, — the lower parts of them, — almost 
 solid, like cheese; the upper parts of the lungs were full of 
 bunches. I think the bunches were almost entirely confined 
 to her lungs. 
 
 Q. Do you doubt these other cattle had the same disease ? 
 
 A. I now thiuk those heifers had the same disease, although 
 their symptoms were different from the symptoms of the ani- 
 mals we had later affected. 
 
 Evening Session. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF J. R. FARRlNGTON. 
 
 Was on State College farm from April, 1872, to 1880. 
 Lost from stock on the farm the following animals : A calf in 
 April, 1872, with hoven or bloat; in 1875 a Short-horn bull 
 (Napoleon). Symptoms, swelling in throat and suffbcation. 
 The swelling was mostly inside, not showing upon the out- 
 
30 
 
 side to much extent. In 1877 Duchess of Lakeside was 
 sick two weeks. The disease or distress seemed to be in 
 stomach. Sold two cows, Susan and Dora, to Mr. Boardman 
 in 1876. Know nothing of them since only by hearsay. 
 Thought of the bull we lost when I heard of the outbreak 
 of cattle disease at Orono. The two cows Dora and Susan 
 were bred at the farm. Thought the disease of the bull 
 might have been caused by a kick. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF LAMBERT SANDS. 
 
 Was a member of Governor's Council in March, 1886. 
 Visited the Orono herd. The stock in new barn did not at 
 first sight seem affected, though a little rough and thin for so 
 well kept a herd. Those in the old stable were coughing and 
 emaciated. Was there but once and by request of Governor 
 Robie, to see what should be done about the cattle. Was 
 present when it was decided to kill them. Cannot say how 
 many cattle in each barn. There were not more than a dozen 
 in the old or horse-barn. I cannot say as I should at that 
 time have advised the investigation of the animals sold off the 
 farm but since have thought it would have been a wise 
 thing. Did not see any attempt on the part of the College 
 to conceal anything in relation to the cattle sold from the 
 farm. Would have had courage to have bought some of the 
 cattle after the investigation. Cattle were coughing in the 
 new barn but not continually. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF S. C. HATCH. 
 
 I was a member of Governor's Council in March, 1886, 
 and visited the Orono State College farm, and after con- 
 sultation at the house went to the new barn where very 
 little symptoms of disease appeared. In the old barn 
 there was much sign of disease. The cattle coughed and 
 were rather thin. Went again in April to the farm, when 
 we decided to have all the cattle slaughtered. There 
 was, so far as I know, no effort made to inquire about 
 
31 
 
 the stock sold off the farm. I was present when the ci.ttle 
 were shiughtered. The lungs of the cattle killed were filled 
 with white masses. Can only explain why no effort was 
 made to investigate the cattle sold by our want of familiarity 
 with the disease. Don't know as the matter of authority to do 
 it was questioned or mentioned. Should have favored such 
 investigation after we had killed the herd. Mrs. Stetson 
 wanted the College to pay her back the money she paid them 
 for the cow and take back the cow. We told her we could 
 do nothing for her and the College would not for fear of other 
 calls of the same kind, I should have advised the College 
 to buy up the cattle sold. There were no funds and we did 
 not feel free to do it. The Kent bull was brought to the 
 notice of the Governor. Dr. Bailey has since bought and 
 killed him. 
 
 Dr. Bailey said when he first called he could not discover any 
 disease till he saw the frozen carcass of adeadcow. Dr. B. said, 
 Think you are more scared than hurt, till he saw said carcass. 
 
 j\Ir. Fernald heard part of this conversation. Would not 
 say if Dr. Bailey appeared as a crank. Sold the bull with 
 enlarged neck to Mr. Sutton of Orono. He killed the bull 
 thinkinof he had a stiff neck. Examined the bull's lunsT. 
 Found no sure si<?ns of disease. Thous^ht at first the neck 
 had enlargement. Dr. B. found no signs of disease till he 
 saw the dead cow. 
 
 President FERNALD said they ran in debt for stock and 
 improvement, increasing both the debt and assets of the farm 
 and one would offset the other at any time till the State destroy- 
 ed the stock, and so now ask the State to appropriate money to 
 pay this debt in consequence. Doubt if the trustees had a 
 technical right to purchase the stock. 
 
 Mr. GOWELL, resuming, said : 
 
 The money to buy the cattle did not come from the State 
 by appropriation. The farm Committee communicates to me 
 the wishes of the trustees. No one except Mr. Gilbert has 
 helped me buy cattle. Other moneys besides that I let them 
 have went into purchasing fancy stock. Trustees loaned $1000 
 
32 
 
 to buy stock. The College has owed me $3400 or $3600. 
 Has been reduced to $2600. Should estimate that $2500 
 might now be owed towards the stock. 
 
 Don't feel it necessary to have trustees called on. Dr. 
 Wilde gave no hint of contagious disease. Can't say if any 
 disease existed or has in herds from which we have purchased. 
 
 I have looked after the accounts of the farm. Have that 
 $2504.25 was paid for cattle bought by myself and Mr. Gilbert 
 by order of the trustees. The College owes me $2600, or so. 
 The cash accounts of the College also show it. I did not let 
 the College have it all at one time. The largest sum I let 
 them have at any one time was $225. The smallest sum 
 $1.50. I cannot say how much of the money owed me by 
 the College went to pay for the cattle destroyed. A part of 
 it did. Four hundred dollars was paid by me in the purchase 
 of these cattle. Can't say if there are others to whom the 
 College owes money used in the purchase of the cattle which 
 were destro3^ed. I called Dr. Wilde four times to see such 
 cattle. I paid him from the farm income. Cannot give an 
 opinion about the stiff-necked cattle. They had disease 
 enough so that I called Dr. Wilde. Did not know that Dr. 
 Bailey could be had without expense. Called Dr. Wilde. 
 Did not call Dr. Bailey. I have no doubt that Rose 8th had 
 this disease. She left Short-horn 3 register. Cannot say if 
 I agree with Dr. Bailey in his report of individual cases of 
 the slaughtered animals. Seven had been killed before the 
 general slaughter. Cannot say I think the stiff-necked ones 
 had tuberculosis. Called Dr. Wilde four times. Do not 
 know that a herd from which we have purchased cattle has 
 had tuberculosis. Nan Lizzie was there at the time of the 
 slaughter. The dams in the herd were as reported by Dr. 
 Bailey except in one instance. The Kent bull was sold from 
 the farm to Mr. Kent of Bucksport. Two other bulls sold 
 had the same sire. Had correspondence with Mr, Kent- 
 Advised him to retain and use the bull after the disease at 
 Orono broke out. Princess Alba was bad when killed. None 
 of her offspring in existence. Soon after Jan., 1886, three 
 
33 
 
 others began to cough and were removed to the other barn for 
 treatment. They were kept there till last of February. Then 
 nearly all the cattle began to cough. The old cow Pet was 
 soon killed and lungs found filled with bunches and ulcers ; 
 the glands of throat also aifected. Profs. Balentine and Jordan 
 were present at the examination of this animal. Immediately 
 after this the State was notified of the condition of the 
 herd. Princess Alba and Alice were slaughtered March 12. 
 The whole herd slaughtered April 21 and 22, 1886. Fourteen 
 bulls were sold off farm as shown by the books. 
 
 (The tabulated statement appended to this, furnished by 
 witness, is a part of his testimony.) 
 
 1 received directions by letter in regard to the quarantine 
 of the cattle. Had directions to separate them and keep 
 them separate. 
 
 Mr. Davis told me he bought a cow from the farm in 1880, 
 and when killed he found her lungs badly diseased. In 1882 
 a cow died and I think it may be she had this disease. 
 When Dr. Bailey arrived and was examining Princess Alba, 
 and had completed it, I asked him what he found, and his 
 reply was, "I shall have to see more than I have seen to 
 condemn any of this herd." But after he examined one of the 
 slaughtered animals he changed his opinion. He did not say 
 in his first examination that there was tuberculosis, but in an 
 hour or two he decided that it was tuberculosis. Think his 
 decision a very correct one. Think the faculty had been 
 reading up on tuberculosis for a few days before Dr. Bailey 
 came. 
 
34 
 
35 
 
 TESTIMONY OF G. W. McALISTER. 
 
 Municipal officer of Bucksport. Was called upon by Mr. 
 Kent in regard to his bull. In March, 188(>, <!illed on me to 
 write to the Superintendent of College farm about the matter. 
 Thought the bull not fit for breeding purposes. He said he 
 bought it for that purpose. Mr. Gowell advised the keeping 
 and use of the bull. Mr. Gilbert wrote to him to use the 
 bull, but I still advised him not to use him, as it might result 
 in the slaughtering of his herd and perhaps others in town. 
 
 In July he notified me he had a diseased bull and I at once 
 notified Dr. Bailey. Dr. B. advised Mr. Kent not to use 
 the bull, decidedly. Dr. B. would not order the destruction 
 of the bull as he had no knowledge of his coming from dis- 
 eased stock. Got a letter later that Dr. B. was ill at home. 
 Later Dr. B. bought the bull for $20 and I agreed to bear 
 half the expense. The bull was a fine looking animal. Was 
 not present when the bull was killed and the lungs sent to 
 Dr. Bailey. Bull was not used at all. Kept the matter 
 quiet, not conferring with the neighbors. Am a carriage- 
 maker ; worked at blacksmithing 20 years. 
 
 Had conversation with Mr. Gilbert on train on liability of 
 the danger of the spread of this disease. He said that he had 
 no reason to change his mind, and if the Kent bull showed no 
 ^igns of disease he saw no reasons to fear to use him. He 
 asked me if Dr. Bailey detected disease in the bull. I told 
 him he could not. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF T. G. RICH. 
 
 Had charge College farm from 1878 to 1881. Lost 2 head of 
 cattle, in 1880 a young cow. We called it dropsy ; refused 
 food and drink ; bloated up ; sick 5 or 6 weeks. Had some 
 cough ; grew thin ; was full of water. Saw no signs of 
 disease. In 1881 another cow 4 years old, was sick. 
 Sent a man to kill her. He said he found lungs rotten. 
 Was out to pasture ; was barren. Don't know what came of 
 her stock-calves. Sold one to Charles Buffum in 1878. 
 
36 
 
 Died or was killed next year ; examined by the butcher, 
 Buftura sold her to him. Sold Mr. Davis a cow for beef, in 
 1880. She was killed and her lungs found affected. Did 
 not see the lungs of any of these. Maggie 3d had a cough 
 some time before I turned her over to Mr. Gowell. Sold 
 one cow to Mr. King of Orono which would not breed. Sold 
 her for $20. Was told she cost $250. 
 
 Thursday Evening, Feb. 24th, 1887. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF LYNDON OAK. 
 
 I am president of the board of trustees. Have never been 
 on the farm committee. I was present on March 12th when 
 Dr. Bailey and Mr. Gilbert of the Cattle Commission were 
 there to make a second examination, as I understood it at the 
 time, of the condition of that stock. I noticed its condition 
 myself. There were some 8 cows tied by themselves in the 
 horse stable. Each one of that number gave unmistakable 
 evidence of serious disease. The symptoms were nothing 
 with which I was acquainted. I am not very familiar with 
 the sickness incident to stock. I was not present when the 
 animals were slaughtered. I know nothing of the condition 
 in which they were found. In consequence of being fre- 
 quently short of funds for the Institution, I urged Mr. Far- 
 rington, when he was on the farm, to increase his herd of 
 dairy stock, which would give a sort of perpetual revenue. 
 Mr. Gilbert, as a member of the board, first made the sugges- 
 tion to me. He thought it would be good policy for the 
 College to do more at the dairying business and realize more 
 from it. We had no money to buy cattle at that time, which 
 was in '82, or about that time. I will now state what I 
 understand to be the facts about the purchase of this herd 
 of cattle. In conversation with members of the board of 
 trustees, among whom were Mr. Gilbert and others, and Mr. 
 Gowell after he came onto the farm, we were confident that 
 
37 
 
 if we got a herd of Jersey cows and used them for dairying 
 purposes we could accomplish two very important purposes. 
 And one was that we should have a perpetual revenue to use 
 for farm purposes, and at the same time we should be in- 
 structing the students in practical dairying, which I regard as 
 one of the most important agricultural interests of the State at 
 this time, and did at that time. But we hadn't the money to 
 make those purchases with. Think that was in '82, or about 
 that time. We were getting ready for Mr. Gowell to enter upon 
 that policy. We had made no application for any appropri- 
 ation for that special purpose, but we hud made applications 
 for purposes often enough to know that we had got to econ- 
 omize and manage in some way to work that farm along 
 without special appropriation from the State, to any great 
 extent, to support it. And we did as many a farmer does ; 
 we made the best provisions we could to make the farm pay 
 expenses and pay something over, and in a short time we 
 reasoned that wo could pay for that herd of stock, and that 
 the stock, with what we paid for it along, would be amply 
 sufficient in case of any emergency to pay the whole debt 
 and leave a surplus besides, and the result, so far as we tried 
 the experiment, proved the soundness of our conclusions in 
 regard to this matter, and had it not been for that most un- 
 fortunate occurrence at the College by which it became neces- 
 sary to destroy that whole herd, one of the tinest I have ever 
 seen anywhere, I think we should have come out all right; 
 and if we could have that stock replaced now 1 do not think 
 we should ever be under the necessity of calling upon the 
 legislature for a single cent to be expended for farm pur- 
 poses. I cannot tell the amount of the indebtedness incurred 
 for the cattle. Authority' to hire the money was given by 
 the trustees. The trustees had no authority' to hire it other 
 than necessity. They delegated the power to hire it to the 
 farm committee, consisting of Mr. Gilbert, Mr. Thing, and 
 Mr. Wingate of Bangor. I think the records of the trustees 
 show the vote by which that authority was given. No special 
 report was made to the trustees by that committee of their 
 
38 
 
 doings. We asked them from time to time about it. The 
 records of the trustees do not show any communication from 
 that committee as to what was done by them nor how much 
 money was hired under the general power. I do not know 
 what security was given to the people of whom they hired. 
 None was given to my knowledge. The trustees loaned to 
 the committee $1000 of the funds of the College which we 
 happened to have at that time at interest at 4 per cent. No 
 security was given or taken when that thousand dollars was 
 passed over. The fact was certified to the treasurer. The 
 farm has paid 4 per cent. The tact of this loan is only 
 known by a charge on the books. In the report of the 
 trustees to the first legislature which met after the farm com- 
 mittee hired this amount, the only mention of the one thousand 
 dollar item is in the tabulated statement of the amount due 
 from the College farm. I do not know of any report to the 
 legislature by anybody as to the balance of the sum which 
 was hired for the purpose of the purchase of this stock. The 
 same report as to the thousand dollars was made to the legis- 
 lature of '85. We did not ask that legislature to make an 
 appropriation for the payment of that debt. We did not 
 call their attention in any way to the fact that the debt ex- 
 isted. I do not think it was generally known prior to the 
 destruction of the herd that it had been bought on credit. I 
 do not know that any interest has been paid to Mr. Gowell 
 for the amount hired of him. I had no personal knowledge 
 of those diseased cattle in the years prior to '86. I remember 
 on one occasion, at a meeting of the trustees, that Mr. Far- 
 rington said he was sorry to say he had lost a cow. I cannot 
 say whether he ever made any report, but I have known the fact 
 that there have been some few lost. I cannot say from whom 
 I knew it. I do not know of any definite report that was 
 made to us of the various deaths in the years prior to '86. 
 My recollection is that there has been a full report made to 
 the legislature by the farm superintendent. 
 
39 
 
 TESTIMONY OF E. E. PARKHURST. 
 
 I am a farmer and reside at Presqiie Isle. I have been one 
 of the trustees of the State College 2 or 2 1-2 years. I have 
 attended every meeting of the trustees since my appoint- 
 ment except the first; I am not certain whether I^ attended 
 the first meeting after my appointment. I was at the farm 3 
 "or 4 times after my appointment up to the time I was called 
 there when the herd was slaughtered. I was called there 
 this last summer. I was called there and arrived either 
 Tuesday or Wednesday morning, and the cattle were slaugh- 
 tered the next day, or half of them were. I examined the 
 herd at that time. They were then separate. The herd in 
 the new barn was in good condition, as good as I ever saw it 
 in, I think ; but theie were 6 or 8 animals that had been 
 separated and taken into the horse stable, that were not looking 
 so well, looking perhaps about as well as our ordinary farm 
 stock does through the country. 1 heard them cough. The 
 indications at that time did not show any disease I was ac- 
 quainted with. I probably would not have known they were 
 diseased by looking at them. I noticed that the cattle in the 
 other barn coughed. I was there the day before they were 
 slaughtered and in the barn 3 or 4 times, and I heard them 
 cough every time. From the light I got from examining the 
 cattle I came to the conclusion it was best to slaughter the 
 herd. I was in doubt as to a few of them in which they 
 could not discover the disease. I think they were all killed. 
 I was not there when they were all slaughtered. I examined 
 some after they were slaughtered and saw indications of tu- 
 berculosis. Think I looked at the lungs of every animal that 
 was slaughtered that day. I had no acquaintance with that 
 disease before that time. Should say I was notified of the 
 disease about a month before the slaughter. I met Mr. 
 Burleigh there the day of the slaughter. I do not want to 
 state this as a fact, but my impression is that Mr. Burleigh 
 said to me like this : Mr. Parkhurst, I hope this thing will 
 be thoroughly investigated — the cause of this disease and 
 
40 
 
 everything connected with it shown up. And I agreed with 
 him in that. I now think it would have been wise to collect 
 and slaughter the eleven bulls that have been mentioned here 
 as having gone out from the farm in the time previous to 
 that. I should not want to breed from them. I do not 
 recollect that Mr. Burleigh said or intimated at that time that 
 he thought there was any provision by which the College 
 could buy in those bulls. I think no one intimated that it 
 was the duty of the College to buy up those bulls. I under- 
 stood that the Cattle Commissioners had the matter in charge 
 at that time. I did not understand that the Governor and 
 Council had any authority in the matter. Part of the Council 
 were there and I think advising. I did not hear them advise 
 or recommend. I understood they were there for that pur- 
 pose. When I was summoned there I supposed the trustees 
 would have something to do with it. After arriving there I 
 learned better than that. I found that the whole thing was 
 in the hands of the Cattle Commissioners and that the trustees 
 were powerless. I went home that night and was not there 
 the second day when they finished slaughtering. I under- 
 stood that the trustees had no right to interfere after the 
 Cattle Commissioners had taken it in hand. I did not under- 
 stand that the trustees had any right to go and purchase back 
 those bulls. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF N. P. HASKELL. 
 
 Reside in Orono. The farm I work adjoins the College 
 farm. I knew nothing of the existence of disease in the herd 
 at the College farm until after the matter came out before 
 the public, and even at that time on going up there I should 
 not have detected any signs of it. I was present when a part 
 of the cattle were killed the first day. I examined every 
 animal that was killed up to the time I left. Part of them 
 showed unmistakable evidence of being badly diseased ; 
 others I should not have detected. There were little bunches, 
 tubercles, as they call them, distributed through different 
 
41 
 
 parts of the system, iu the lungs of a great many, some very 
 large and some very small. Think I noticed them as large 
 as my two fists would be and containing matter of some sort. 
 Those that I saw opened did not have large cavities. The 
 tubercles seemed to be quite thick. I noticed them adhering 
 to the ribs of animals in quite a number of cases. I noticed 
 some indications of the disease in all of the animals, but do 
 not think I should have detected it in some unless my atten- 
 tion was particularly called to it. I was present generally 
 with Dr. Bailey and Dr. Michener, who made the examination, 
 and noticed things that I should not have if I had been alone. 
 I saw some of the herd slaughtered that were in the new barn, 
 the herd that appeared and looked the best. I own Jersey 
 cattle. I know about the feed and treatment of the cattle at 
 the College farm. I should say that the care of the cattle 
 had been the very best and the feed had been such as would 
 l)e warranted. 
 
 Q. What was the actual condition of the cattle a month 
 before the disease was known, as you saw them? 
 
 A. 1 called the cattle in extra condition. They were much 
 fleshier than the ordinary farm stock. There was nothing 
 about them to me a month before the disease broke out to in- 
 dicate that there was any disease among them. There never 
 has been any disease in my own herd. My barn is about 3-4 
 of a mile from the College barn, in a direct line. The pas- 
 tures join each other and I think quite likely that the cattle 
 may have been back and forth, but I do not know in regard 
 to that. A good many of mine were Jerseys — Jerseys and 
 high grades. To mature cows 5 years old in full tlow of 
 milk, I will say 4 weeks after dropping of calf, I fed gen- 
 erally about 4 quarts of Indian meal and 4 quarts of shorts a 
 ■day. I let my cows run out in the pasture, but there was 
 no feed to amount to anything and I was obliged to feed in 
 the barn. I think the College herd ran out where they could 
 get the air. I have no knowledge of the disease in my herd. 
 The symptoms in these cattle were nothing I had ever seen 
 before or was acquainted with. Since that I have seen the 
 
42 
 
 lungs of an animal slaughtered, diseased beyond a doubt. 
 The animal belonged to a gentleman in Bangor. Think that 
 animal did not in any way come from the College herd. I 
 do not think I would breed from those bulls that have gone 
 out. I think it is policy for some one to kill them. I have 
 taken no precaution to guard my herd from contagion ; no 
 diffei-ent from my every-day care. The cattle had not been 
 turned out that spring. As far as I am concerned, I would 
 not breed from an animal that was diseased, or a descendant 
 of one that was diseased, if I knew it. If they belonged to 
 me and I knew they were diseased I would kill them in a 
 moment. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF A. M. SHAW. 
 
 I was one of the farm hands and occasionally fed these 
 animals. In the morning they had their fodder of hay. After 
 they had eaten that they had their ration of grain. Their 
 grain for a day's ration was a quart of shorts, a quart of 
 Indian meal and a quart of cotton seed meal for matured 
 cows ; young cows that were in milk had a quart of shorts 
 with a pint of Indian meal and a pint of cotton seed. That 
 is what they give twice a day. That would be two quarts of 
 each for mature cows. Hay was fed to them 3 times a day. 
 They were watered twice a day. In the summer time they 
 were turned out of the barn every day and ran in the pasture 
 the same as other cattle, and put up nights in the barn. They 
 were occasionally turned out in the winter season. They 
 were turned out twice a day to drink and put up after drink- 
 ing. Probably no herd in the State was kept cleaner than 
 they were. The barn was well ventilated. I never saw any 
 appearance of disease about the cattle up to a month before 
 they were slaughtered. The disease appeared to me like a 
 Kudden outbreak. It broke out the first of the winter, I 
 could not tell just the time. I think snow was on the ground 
 when the symptoms first appeared. I had not noticed any 
 cough among the cattle earlier than that except in the cow 
 
43 
 
 Betsey that has been spoken of. Those others began to- 
 cough a few weeks after that. I have been on the place 4 
 years last June. I first noticed that the cow Betsey coughed 
 sometime in the fall of '85. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF ARTHUR HARRIS. 
 
 I had the care of this stock and tended it about 2 years. 
 I had charge of it when the disease broke out. I did not 
 discover any trouble with the stock any length of time prior 
 to the outbreak. To the oldest cows we fed a quart of bran 
 and a quart of cotton seed and a quart of meal twice a day. 
 I fed it from a list prepared by Mr. Gowell. In connection 
 with this grain I fed to each cow about 20 pounds of ha^'^ a 
 day. The animals were turned to pasture in the summer and 
 put in the barn at night. The young stock was turned out in 
 the yard for exercise in fine weather in the winter. Occa- 
 sionally other stock was turned out during the winter. They 
 were turned out to water twice a day. We fed from the- 
 barn night and morning during the summer. The pasture 
 did not afford sufficient feed. In the winter time the stock 
 was watered in the stable. Once in a while, in very fine 
 weather in winter the older stock was turned out. I noticed 
 this coughing in the cow Betsey at the time Mr. Shaw spoke 
 of, and that is all I noticed. This is the first notice I had of 
 it. That was in the fall of '85. This cow that coughed 
 began to lose some flesh before the outbreak of the disease. 
 The next indication of disease was in the cow Pet. I do not 
 remember how soon that was. I do not remember how soon 
 another was taken. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF GEORGE A. BAILEY. 
 
 Q. Are you the Secretary of the Cattle Commission ? 
 
 A. I was when I was on the Board. 
 
 Q. Your report of this has been put in print? 
 
 A. It has. 
 
 Q. You were called to the State College farm at what time ? 
 
44 
 
 A. 5th day of March. 
 
 Q. Who invited you to come there ? 
 
 A. Z. A. Gilbert. 
 
 Q. Will you state to the committee what condition you found 
 the stock in generally? 
 
 A. Fair condition, good condition. 
 
 Q. Will you state to the committee what the sanitary con- 
 ditions were in regard to the care of the stock, the condition 
 of the barn? 
 
 A. As near perfect as I ever saw one, I think. 
 
 Q. Will you state to the committee what was the relative 
 character of the herd of stock, setting aside the disease? 
 
 A. It was a high class of cattle in as fine appearance as I 
 have ever seen in Maine. 
 
 Q. Whether or not you have heard the testimony as to the 
 feed of these cattle? 
 
 A. I have. 
 
 Q. Whether or not in your judgment, as a veterinary sur- 
 geon, you think that the feed of these cattle had anything 
 whatever to do with the origin or development of the disease 
 tuberculosis? 
 
 A. I do not in the slightest. 
 
 Q. Whether or not from your examination of these cattle 
 and what you know of the development of this disease there 
 was anything to excite alarm in the common farmer so as to 
 summon a cattle commission prior to the time that the disease 
 broke out? 
 
 A.'^The 6th of March, do you mean? Do you call that the 
 time ? 
 
 Q. I do not know exactly what the time is. The time it 
 broke out in their cattle, then, the first one? 
 
 A. Of course I do not know when it broke out in their cat- 
 tle, of my own knowledge. The 6th of March was my first 
 visit. Of course I have no knowledge of when they showed 
 the first symptoms of the disease. 
 
 Q. You have heard the symptoms from Shaw ? 
 
 A. Yes. 
 
45 
 
 Q. What would you say as to the ordinary knowledge of a 
 common farmer, or even a dairyman, as to summoning a com- 
 mission on contagion diseases sooner than they did, from your 
 knowledge ()f it? 
 
 A. 1 should say that it ought to have been done sooner 
 than my call of the 6th of March, from the appearance of 
 some members of the herd. 
 
 Q. And from your knowledge of how the disease has de- 
 veloped? 
 
 A. I do not know of my own knowledge how it has de- 
 veloped, only from what I hear of it — no personal knowledge. 
 On March 6th, when I visited the herd, some of those indi- 
 vidual cases were so poor that it must have been patent to 
 somebody, long before that, that there was trouble there. 
 
 Q. You have understood what the facts were in regard to 
 the symptoms prior to that, have you ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. You understand that all the symptoms there were the 
 cough of the cow Betsey ? 
 
 A. I do not quite understand it that way. 
 
 Q. How do you ? 
 
 A. Several besides her that had shown symptoms ; they had 
 become emaciated and died, and been slaughtered, and coughed 
 — several besides Betsey. Pet had been killed ten days before 
 I arrived ; prominent symptoms of tuberculosis. 
 
 Q. From what you heard and understood, were there any 
 symptoms in these cattle until the disease developed to show 
 itself, as you understand it did, that would lead a man to sup- 
 pose there was a fatal disease lingering in this herd? 
 
 A. From what I heard we know now that they recognized 
 it a long time before in some individual cases. 
 
 Q. Who recognized it? 
 
 A. Mr. Gowell, himself, as long ago as 1882, in Rose 8th. 
 I do not know, of course, when she first showed it. 
 
 Q. Was there anything else about the rest of the herd other 
 than this isolated case that would indicate it was a disease of 
 the herd? 
 
46 
 
 A. The personnel of that herd when I was called to see it 
 •was as unsuspicious as any herd I ever saw that finally proved 
 to be diseased. They were as fine looking and as well kept 
 a,nd cared for as any herd I ever visited. 
 
 Q. You went there in your official capacity, did you ? 
 
 A. I did, the 6th of March. 
 
 Q. These cattle were ordered quarantined? 
 
 A Immediately. 
 
 Q. Did you take charge of them the same as though they 
 belonged to an individual ? 
 
 A. We issued a written notice to the superintendent and 
 put them in quarantine at once. 
 
 Q. Treated them as though they had been the property of 
 -any farmer? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Pursued no different course ? 
 
 A, No, sir. 
 
 Q. Did you issue any orders to the trustees in regard to 
 ^thern ? 
 
 A. We did not, for Mr. Gilbert was a member of the trus- 
 tees himself. He was also chairman of our board, ex-officio, 
 
 Q. Do I understand you that the Cattle Commissioners had 
 full charge of this herd of cattle from the time they went 
 4 here? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, they had full power to do so, under the law. 
 
 Q. Were you advised by the Governor and Council ? 
 
 A. We advised with them in relation to it several times. 
 
 Q. Now this herd was killed by your advice, was it? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Under your authority ? 
 
 A. It was. 
 
 Q. Will you state whether there was any talk at that time 
 .^bout following up the disease at that time in other cattle ? 
 
 A. Not at that time 
 
 Q. I want to know whether there was anything said about 
 following up the disease in the progeny of the cattle at this 
 time? 
 
47 
 
 A. I do not think there was. The statement was made to 
 me that the bull calves had been sold and the heifers had been 
 retained. 
 
 Q. What 1 vvant to get at is whether the trustees were noti- 
 fied by you that they must get back the bulls ? 
 
 A. Not at all. The tirst thing in order was the disposition 
 of that herd. Nothing was said by the Commissioners that 
 the trustees must go round and get the rest of the bulls. 
 
 (The examination of Dr. Baile^^ at this point was tempo- 
 rarily suspended.) 
 
 TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM B. FERGUSON. 
 
 1 was a member of the Cattle Commission up to Sept. 25th. 
 I reside in Brewer and am a farmer. I received a letter from 
 Mr. Gilbert about the middle of March. I suppose that letter 
 is in Monroe, where I lived before moving to Brewer. He 
 wrote me about the middle of March saying that he supposed 
 J had learned through the papers then that there was diffi- 
 culty with the herd of cattle at Orono. And he said when I 
 was in Bangor 1 had better, at my convenience, go up, or he 
 would like to have me go up and look them over. That is 
 the purport of the letter. I went up alone the 18th of 
 March and examined the cattle. I stopped over night and 
 was there a part of two days, the 18th and 19th, and went 
 back to Monroe. I saw the herd. The new barn contained 
 the most of them, and as far as looks went they were in good 
 condition. I noticed a cough about them. I knew enough 
 about cattle to know that that cough was not right. The 
 cough itself would be strange for well animals. I do not 
 think well animals are afflicted with a cough. I had never 
 before noticed creatures with a cough such as I saw there. 
 The cough was all I should have noticed about the cattle in 
 the new barn, and it was evident to me that something wrong 
 produced it. They had a bad cough and were badly emaci- 
 ated. I had never seen those symptoms in cattle before, that I 
 am aware of, not of that disease. No one was with me ex- 
 cept Mr. Gowell. From every appearance upon examination 
 
48 
 
 I was satisfied beyond the possibility of a doubt that those in 
 the smaller barn were badly diseased. After I returned from 
 there I wrote to Mr. Gilbert that I had been up and I thought 
 the quicker those isolated cattle were killed the better. I 
 received a notice from Mr. Gilbert about the time of the 
 slaughter, immediately before, saying that a veterinary,. 
 Michener his name is, was coming there, and he would like 
 to have me there also ; that he and Dr. Bailey should be there. 
 I did not get the notice to enable me to be there sooner than 
 the second day of the slaughter, in the morning, the 23d, I 
 think. Probably half of them were killed after I got there. 
 I examined those animals and saw them dissected. I also 
 examined the lungs of several killed the day before. The 
 worst cases were killed the first day, and it was surprising to 
 me that they could live in the condition in which I found 
 their lungs. I said to Mr. Gilbert those cattle better be 
 killed, the sooner the better. The cattle killed the second 
 day showed different degrees of the disease. As far as I 
 know they were all diseased. A few days before the 20th of 
 last October I received a communication from Mr. Gilbert say- 
 ing he would like to have me meet him the 20th of October in 
 Portland, at a meeting of the board. I went. After I got there 
 I learned from Dr. Bailey that our commissions had expired, 
 his and mine. They had expired a month before that meet- 
 ing and there had been no re-appointment at that time. I 
 had understood that Dr. Bailey was unwell and it was desir- 
 able to meet at his house. I and Mr. Gilbert and Mr. Bell 
 met at the City Hotel. We had some conversation there 
 principally in regard to the extermination of those bulls that 
 had gone out from the College farm. I had not seen the 
 Commissioners before since April. We went over to Dr. 
 Bailey's house, and Dr. Bailey and Mr. Gilbert had a lively 
 argument about following up those bulls and having them 
 destroyed. Dr. Bailey contended that they should be looked 
 after and destroyed and Mr. Gilbert objected to it, saying 
 that there was no proof that they were diseased, and that the 
 law gave no authority. I always received my notice to meet 
 
49 
 
 with the Commissioners for any purpose from Mr. Gilbert. 
 In one or two cases I acted without notice from anybody ex- 
 cept the municipal officers. Dr. Bailey was chosen secretary 
 of the board and I understood his duties to be to keep a 
 record of our doings, the same as the secretary of any other 
 board. 
 
 Q. Did you come to any conclusion at Portland as to what 
 was best to do with the stock that was out? 
 
 A. I was out myself then by the expiration of my com- 
 mission, and of course I was not very officious. Mr. Gilbert 
 is a member of the board ex-officio and needs no appointment. 
 Subsequent to our firtt appointment another was added to the 
 Commission, making four on the board. When I got to Port- 
 land on Oct. 20th I had a consultation in Mr. Gilbert's room 
 at the City Hotel, with Mr. Gilbert and Mr. Bell, before we 
 went to Dr. Bailey's house. Mr. Gilbert invited us to his 
 room. Mr. Gilbert said he wanted to prepare our minds for 
 something that we should get from Dr. Bailey ; he wanted to 
 prepare our minds for something that Dr. Bailey was crazy 
 on, to use his phrase. He said he was crazy on those out- 
 standing bulls. We conversed in his room 30 minutes in 
 regard to that, then we went to Dr. Bailey's house and talked, 
 the matter over there. I was of the opinion that those bulls 
 should have been before taken care of. I ao^reed with Dr. 
 Bailey in that particular and have signed the report which he 
 has made to the legislature. Mr. Bell, the other Commis- 
 sioner, also agreed in the propriety of the destruction of the 
 bulls and also signed the report. I saw the Kent bull in 
 Bucksport on Oct. 22d. Dr. Bailey said in Portland that in- 
 asmuch as I lived near by I had better go down and see the 
 bull and the party who owned him. Think the matter of that 
 bull was talked over on the 20th of October. I examined 
 that bull the 22d. He was in fair condition as to flesh, but 
 not fleshy enough for beef. He had a staring coat and I did 
 not like the expression of his countenance, things that I should 
 not call just right. I have had considerable to do with cattle 
 
50 
 
 and horses and lean judge as quickly of the healthfulness or 
 unheal thfulness by the looks of their eyes as by most anything. 
 I told Kent that I should not use the bull. At our meeting on 
 the 20th of October, Mr. Gilbert said there was no evidence 
 that the bull was diseased that he knew of. Dr. Bailey stated 
 at that time that the bull was out of one of the worst diseased 
 cows that were killed in the previous April. I understood 
 that Mr. Gilbert was opposed to having anything to do with 
 the Kent bull. I saw Mr. Gilbert here at the opening of the 
 legislature, and I understood him to say that Dr. Bailey had 
 no business to go down to Bucksport when he did to make the 
 examination. I think he disputed my right to fees for going 
 down there on the same errand. I understood him to say that 
 the board had nothing whatever to do with the Kent bull. I 
 asked him at that time if he was not going to make a report, and 
 I think he said he didn't know. I spoke to him about it here 
 in this room, the first day of the session of the legislature. 
 It was my opinion and advice in Portland that those bulls 
 should be taken in charge and killed ; I thought they had better 
 not be propagating their kind. 
 
 Q. You thought it was Mr. Gilbert's duty as Cattle Commis- 
 sioner to gather them up? 
 
 A. I haven't said anything about that. 
 
 Q. What is your opinion? 
 
 A. I think it was more the duty of the trustees of the 
 College than anybody else's. I knew bulls were sold from 
 the farm, but I knew nothing about them. The first I knew 
 that the bulls had been sold from the farm Avas when I was in 
 Portland. I agreed in Portland that the bulls had better be 
 called in. Mr. Bell and Mr. Gilbert discussed considerably 
 in Portland the question of whether or not there was a law 
 allowing or providing for calling in the bulls. I might have 
 expressed an opinion that the Commissioners might not have 
 authority to take animals and kill them unless there was some 
 evidence of disease. I do not understand that we have a law- 
 authorizing the Cattle Commissioners to go out and destroy an 
 animal after it has been pronounced sound by proper authori- 
 
51 
 
 ties. I understand there is law by which the trustees could 
 call these cattle in — the law that they themselves do business 
 there by. When I saw Kent he was very anxious to get rid 
 of his bull. 
 
 Q. Unless there was evidence of disease in these cattle when 
 they were sold, would you consider that the College was under 
 any more obligation to buy them back than an individual would 
 be? 
 
 A. Yes; I should, those animals, because they sold them. 
 
 Q. If you had sold an animal that was sound and you knew of 
 no disease upon him or in the herd, and the disease afterwards 
 developed in the herd and your cattle were destroyed, would 
 you consider you were obliged to go and buy the cattle you 
 had sold in a sound condition and that were still in sound con- 
 dition ? 
 
 A. If that disease could be traced back to the breedinsr ani- 
 mal I should consider I was under both moral and legal obli- 
 gation to take him back. 
 
 Q. But that question as to whether It is traceable back is an 
 open question, isn't it? 
 
 A. Perhaps so. I do not understand it is so among experts. 
 I understand by veterinary authorities that it is hereditary. 
 
 Q. Do you understand that there is any certainty of how 
 this disease developed in this herd of cattle at Orono? 
 
 A. By contagion and by heredity both. I understand 
 there is no other way by which it can be propagated. I un- 
 derstand that these cattle were brought from different herds. 
 Some got it probably by contagion, others by heredity. 
 
 Q. Then would you search out the bulls where there was a 
 hereditary tendency and leave those where the dam died from 
 contagion? How would you distinguish there? 
 
 A. I should say that the strong probability was that those 
 bulls were unsound and unsafe from hereditary tendencies. 
 
 Q. We will say here is a cow brought into the herd at the 
 College ; that cow drops a bull one year prior to this conta- 
 gion ; that bull is sold at three months old and goes out. 
 Afterwards that cow takes this contagion from the rest of the 
 
52 
 
 cattle and dies. Do you think the College is under any moral 
 legal obligation to call in that bull ? 
 
 A. Perhaps not. If there is no suspicion of the bull I do not 
 know any reason why they should take him back. But these 
 bulls bred from cows diseased while they were carrying the 
 calves I should say the College was under obligation to take 
 back. 
 
 Q. As matter of fact, is there any certainty that any of 
 these cows were diseased when they carried these calves four 
 years ago? 
 
 A. I could not tell that. I understand that the Kent bull 
 was really diseased. Dr. Bailey and Dr. Michener are my 
 authority. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF Z. A. GILBEET. 
 
 You have alluded here to two reports of the Cattle Commis- 
 sioners. Allow me to say in connection with this that the 
 report you have spoken of as a minority report is a record of 
 the doings of the Commission, required under the law, for 
 the two years ending the 10th of January of this year. 
 What you have designated as the majority report does not 
 purport to cover the work of the board, but simply one 
 feature of that work, which is the herd at the State College. 
 
 By Mr, Libhy : 
 
 Q. What connection are you of Mr. Gowell, I mean what 
 relation ? 
 
 A. I did not know that I was related to him. I am not 
 related to him. You mean by kin? 
 
 Q. Yes. Is Mr. Gowell connected in any way with you by 
 marriage. Are you any connection of his in any way? 
 
 A. In no way, shape or manner that I know of. 
 
 Q. Then you say Mr. Gowell is not your nephew ? 
 
 A. He is not my nephew. 
 
 By Mr. Rich: 
 
 Q. Have you got your report made up for the last 2 years ? 
 
53 
 
 A. That report was made up and presented to the legisla- 
 ture about the 12th or 15th of January. I am unable to state 
 the date that it was laid on your table. 
 
 Mr. Lihhy : The report has been distributed here. 
 
 Mr. Rich: I have not received one. 
 
 Witness: My report was made up from data kept by Dr. 
 Bailey and furnished to me for the purpose of making up my 
 report, covering every item of our doings for the two years 
 required by the law — every action of the board during that 
 time. The data were furnished by Dr. Bailey. 
 
 Dr. Bailey: We agreed in our reports, as I understand 
 it, clear up to the matter of the Kent bull. 
 
 By Mr. Cornish: 
 
 Q. Have you any statement you wish to make to the com- 
 mittee before any questions are asked ? 
 
 A. No, sir. 
 
 Q. Very well. Did you receive an order from the legis- 
 lature to make and file your report? 
 
 A. I did. 
 
 Q. And you hadn't filed it at that time? 
 
 A. It was in the hands of the printers, in preparation for 
 presentation, at the time the order was passed through the 
 legislature. 
 
 Q. What time was the order passed through the legisla- 
 ture ? 
 
 A. I cannot tell you. The date of the order is in my 
 valise at the house. 
 
 Q. It was not prepared and filed on or before January 
 10th, as required by the statute? 
 
 A. It was not. 
 
 Q. You speak of that as a record of your doings. Did 
 you ask any of your associates to sign that with you? 
 
 A. Yes. 
 
 Q. Which ones ? 
 
 A. Mr. Bell, the only associate I had at that time. 
 
 Q. Did Mr. Bell refuse to sign it? 
 
 A. He did. 
 
54 
 
 Q. On what ground ? 
 
 A. I was unable to find out. 
 
 Q. Did that conversation you had with him in regard to 
 signing the report take place in the station at Woodford's? 
 
 A. No, on the platform. 
 
 Q. Well, at the station? 
 
 A. At the station. 
 
 Q. Did you ever ask him at any other time than that? 
 .A. I do not recollect that I did. 
 
 Q. When did you first know of the existence of this dis- 
 ease, or have any suspicions of the existence of it at the 
 State College? 
 
 A. I haven't the date. It was about the time of that fear- 
 ful blow and blockade on the railroads last winter, the last 
 days of February, I think. 
 
 Q. That was the first suspicion you had of it ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Have you brought to the committee the letters in your 
 possession from the other members of your board? Have 
 you them here ? 
 
 A. I have the letters of Dr. Bailey. 
 
 Q. They are all here, are they? 
 
 A. In relation to the cattle at the College ? 
 
 Q. Yes. I mean in relation to this matter now being in- 
 vestigated. Those letters are here? 
 
 A. They are here. 
 
 Q. Have you the correspondence with the other members 
 of your board ? 
 
 A. I haven't. I haven't been requested to bring papers in 
 here by any party whatever. 
 
 Q. But you knew the terms of the order under which the 
 committee is acting? 
 
 A. I read the order, yes, sir. 
 
 Q. And assisted in making up the list of names of persons 
 to be summoned ? 
 
 A. I suggested names of parties whom I thought it would 
 be well to summon. 
 
55 
 
 Q. Now you say your suspicions were tirst aroused about 
 the first of March ? 
 
 A. No, I did not say so. 
 
 Q. When was it? 
 
 A. I cannot fix the time. It was al)out the time of that 
 blockade. That was the first of March or the hist of February. 
 
 Q. Prior to that time you had no suspicion of it? 
 
 A. None whatever. 
 
 Q. Had you never had a suspicion of the disease in portions 
 of the State prior to that time? 
 
 A. I have been notified of disease in different portions of 
 the State probably every year that I have been Secretary of the 
 Board of Agriculture, and some years many times, in various 
 sections of the State. 
 
 Q. Of tuberculosis? 
 
 A. Of contagious diseases. 
 
 Q. Had you prior to that, or within a few months prior to 
 that, any notice of tuberculosis existing in any other section 
 of the State ? 
 
 A. No. 
 
 Q. Not in any other herd of cattle ? 
 
 A. No. 
 
 Q. Had you within a few months any knowledge or sus- 
 picion of any contagious disease in any herd of cattle? 
 I mean, prior to this outln-eak, the first of March, had you re- 
 ceived any knowledge or information as to the outbreak of 
 any contagious disease in any herd of cattle in the State? 
 
 A. I could not answer that question. I presume I had, as 
 I formerly stated — 
 
 Q. In any large herd of cattle ? 
 
 A. As I formerly stated to you, I was receiving from time 
 to time along — 
 
 Q. Can you state to the committee a single instance within 
 three months prior to the first of March ? 
 
 A. I cannot, but my letters at home might show it. 
 
 Q. You haven't in mind that it was called specially to your 
 attention ? 
 
56 
 
 A. I could not specify any instance. 
 
 Q. (Letter dated February 2, 1886, and marked "A" shown 
 witness) Is that your handwriting? 
 A. Yes, sir, it is. 
 Q. That is your letter ? 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 (The letter was read in evidence, and is as follows :) 
 
 "A" 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture, 
 
 North Greene, Feb. 2, 1886. 
 
 Dr. Bailey : — What have you to say of a case of death from tuberculo- 
 sis of an animal kept till the time of her death in the stable with a large 
 herd of other cattle? 
 
 Is it likely to follow herds, and possibly tardily, where an animal has 
 been sick with it? 
 
 Pardon me for troubling you, but I would like information on aboxe 
 
 points. 
 
 Kesp'y yours, 
 
 (Signed) Z. A. Gilbert. 
 
 Q. Now, can you state what herds you had in mind at that 
 time, and what death you had in mind? 
 
 A. I cannot. 
 
 Q. Did you receive a reply to that from Dr. Bailey? 
 
 A. I think I did. 
 
 Q. Have you it in your possessio*n ? 
 
 A. I do not know as I shall be able to select the letter at 
 once. All these letters I have here can go into the hands of 
 the committee if they desire. 
 
 Q. Did you know of the killing of the Gray Nose and Jer- 
 sey Lily, as the}' are called? 
 
 A. I do not know anything about any names. I am ac- 
 quainted with the killing of the herd of cattle at Orono, but 
 I cannot specify as to names. 
 
 Q. Do you remember when they were killed ? 
 
 A. Yes. There were two cattle killed by order of the 
 Commissioners ; I cannot state the date, but it was sometime 
 in March. 
 
57 
 
 Dr. Bailey:— The 12th of March. 
 
 Witness: — 12th of March by order of the Commissioners. 
 
 Q. Were you present at the killing of those two? 
 
 A. I was. 
 
 Q. Were you present at the examination of them ? 
 
 A. I was. 
 
 Q. Was tuberculosis found to exist ? 
 
 A. Something Dr. Bailey called tuberculosis. 
 
 Q. Up to that time did you know anything about the dis- 
 ease? 
 
 A. No. 
 
 Q. And you saw what he called the evidences of the disease ? 
 
 A. I did. 
 
 Q. Was that Jersey Lily a half sister of the Kent bull ? 
 
 A. I do not know anything about it. 
 
 Q. Do you know that she had the same dam, the Princess 
 Alba? 
 
 A. No, I do not know anything about the breed ; haven't 
 kept the run of it. 
 
 Q. After the killing didn't you realize the fact that that Kent 
 bull was out of the Princess Alba ? 
 
 A. I did not know anything about it at that time. 
 
 Q. And that the Jersey Lily that was killed was a half 
 sister ? 
 
 A. I didn't know anything about it until Dr. Bailey informed 
 me later in the season. 
 
 Q. Coming now to the Kent bull, what was the first in- 
 formation you had as to him ? 
 
 A. I had a letter from Mr. Kent inquiring of me something 
 in regard to a bull that he bought from the College herd. 
 
 Q. When was that? 
 
 A. I cannot tell you. It was sometime along in the spring 
 or summer, but I haven't the date of it. It was not an official 
 matter, and consequently I did not make any official record 
 of it. 
 
 Q. Why was it not an official letter ? 
 
58 
 
 A. Because it did not call upon me as one of the Cattle 
 Commissioners. 
 
 Q. How did he happen to write to you ? 
 
 A. I do not know anything about that. 
 
 Q. Didn't you suppose he wrote to you as a member of 
 the board of Commissioners? 
 
 A. He didn't address me as one of the Cattle Commissioners. 
 
 Q. Does a man have to address you in a matter of that 
 kind as a member of that board before you take any action 
 upon the matter? 
 
 A. I do not know whether that would be the case or not. 
 
 Q. If a man writes to you addressing you as "Z. A. Gil- 
 bert," or "Hon. Z. A. Gilbert," without putting on "Member" 
 or "Chairman of the Board of Cattle Commissioners," and in- 
 forms you of a suspicion of diseased animals in his herd, do 
 you take no notice of the letter? 
 
 A. I do take notice of the letter. 
 
 Q. Why didn't you take notice of that letter? 
 
 A. I did. 
 
 Q. But not officially ? 
 
 A. I did not officially. 
 
 Q. Do you take notice of the others officially? 
 
 A. He did not inform me of a diseased animal. 
 
 Q. Do you take notice of the others officially ? 
 
 A. I do when I am informed of diseased animals. 
 
 Q. Have you that letter in your possession ? 
 
 A. I have not. It was a private letter and I do not keep 
 them on file. All my official letters are kept on file. 
 
 Q. How do you tell whether a letter comes to you in your 
 private or official capacity ? 
 
 A. If it was a letter in regard to a diseased bull I should 
 suppose it was in an official capacity. 
 
 Q. This was not? 
 
 A. It was not. 
 
 Q. Was it not in regard to a bull he had suspicion about 
 bavins: the disease ? 
 
59 
 
 A. In this letter he told me the bull was not diseased. 
 
 Q. "Why did he write to you then? 
 
 A. He addressed me as a brother Patron and asked my 
 advice. 
 
 Q. About using a bull that was not diseased? 
 
 A, About using a bull which was purchased at the College 
 farm prior to the outbreak of disease there. 
 
 Q. Did be at that time state to you anything about whether 
 he had suspicion of the disease? 
 
 A. He stated to me that the animal was well, that he ate 
 well, looked well and appeared well, and that he was well. 
 
 Q. And you haven't taken pains to preserve that letter, 
 but are simply stating the contents of it now from memory? 
 
 A. I am stating it from memory ; I did not preserve it. 
 
 Q. At the time you received that letter had any of the 
 cattle at the State farm been killed? 
 
 A. They had all been killed. 
 
 Q. Did you take pains to answer hira to ascertain the par- 
 entage of that bull ? 
 
 A. I did not at all. 
 
 Q. Not the slightest? 
 
 A. Not at all. 
 
 Q. Didn't try to find out whether the mother of the bull 
 was one of the worst diseased cattle of the herd? 
 
 A. I have answered that question. 
 
 Q. Did you or not ? 
 
 A. I say I did not. 
 
 Q. Did you take any pains to inform yourself as to the 
 condition of the bull before replying? 
 
 A. No. 
 
 Q. And this letter you received was immediately after the 
 killing, was it not? 
 
 A. No, sir ; I cannot state when it was. My impression 
 is that it was immediately after the killing. 
 
 Q. On what days were the cattle killed there? 
 
 A. I think it was the 22d and 23d of April. (Letter 
 marked "B" shown witness.) 
 
60 
 
 Q. Is that the letter which you sent to Mr. Kent in reply 
 to his? 
 
 A. It is. 
 
 Q. What is the date of that ? 
 
 A. April 30th. 
 
 Q. Then prior to April 30th you had received from him 
 his letter? 
 
 A. I presume so. 
 
 Q. Then it must have been immediately after the killing. 
 It seems that you received his letter when the matter was en- 
 tirely fresh in your mind? 
 
 A. Of course it must have been fresh in my mind at that 
 time. 
 
 (Mr. Cornish reads in evidence the letter marked "B," 
 which is as follows :) 
 
 "B" 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture, \ 
 
 North Greene, April 30, 1886. ) 
 
 Mr. S. N. Kent : — Your letter is at hand. Tf I were in your place I 
 
 should retain and use the bull. As long as he has shown no cough and 
 
 no other signs of disease it is safe to conclude he is well. If he is well it 
 
 is safe and proper to use him. 
 
 Resp'y yours, 
 
 (Signed) Z. A. Gilbert. 
 
 Q. You have heard the physicians testify, have you not, 
 that an animal might have that disease and have no cough ? 
 A. Yes, might have a cough and no disease. 
 Q. But he might have that disease and yet have no cough ? 
 A. Yes. 
 
 Q. So that the cough is not the only symptom? 
 A. No. 
 
 Q. And not a necessary incident to the disease ? 
 A. No, but a usual accompaniment of it. 
 Q. But still, not a necessary one ? 
 A. Not always. 
 
61 
 
 Q. Do you know when the stiff-necked one was killed, 
 in March, 1885? Were you made acquainted with the fact 
 that two stiff-necked ones were killed, in March, 1885? 
 
 A. No. 
 
 Q. And did you know that one of those was half sister to 
 this very Kent bull ? 
 
 A. No, sir, I didn't know anything about the breed, records 
 or parentage, or anything about it ; nothing at all. 
 
 Q. After your correspondence with Mr. Kent, what was 
 your next correspondence in regard to the Kent bull ? 
 
 A. I have no recollection of any further correspondence 
 with Mr. Kent in regard to the bull. 
 
 Q. Well, with any member of your Commission? 
 
 A. I do not know as I could state that correctly. I had 
 some correspondence with some members of the Commission 
 in regard to that bull. 
 
 Q. Did you have a letter from Dr. Bailey inclosing Mr. 
 McAlister's notice the latter part of July or the first part of 
 August as to this bull ? 
 
 A. I believe I received such a letter including Mr. McAlis- 
 ter's notice. 
 
 Q. And the document which I produce is the notice which 
 was included ? 
 
 A. I could not swear to the notice at all. It was returned 
 by request to Dr. Bailey. I could not state whether this was 
 the notice or not. 
 
 Q. Did you reply to Dr. Bailey on that matter? 
 
 A. I presume I did ; I usually replied to his letters, all of 
 them. 
 
 (Letter dated August 10th, 1886, and marked "C" shown 
 witness.) 
 
 Q. Is that the letter which you sent to Dr. Bailey in reply ? 
 
 A. I think that is the reply. 
 
 (The letter was read in evidence by Mr. Cornish, and is as 
 follows :) 
 
62 
 
 State of Maine 
 
 •d of A 
 North Greene, Aug. 10, 1886 
 
 Board of Agriculture, 1 
 
 Dr. Bailej'^ : 
 
 Dear Sir; — Your letter with doc's at hand. I do not think case war- 
 ranted a visit from you and thej^ probably toolv the course they did to get 
 an examination of the animal at State's expense. I knew all about the 
 case. 
 
 In regard to my advice to use the bull : it is the only position we can 
 take. The bull was sound, so stated, "and we have no evidence that he 
 came from any other than sound parentage." The only thing to say is 
 that he is all right. If he doesn't feel easy about it, it is none of our busi- 
 ness ; then he must sell him, that's all. 
 
 Yours, 
 
 (Signed) Gilbert. 
 
 Q. Was not there evidence to you, as a member of the 
 Board of Trustees of the College, or as a member of the 
 Cattle Commissioners present at the killing in all your capa- 
 cities, that he did come of unsound parentage? 
 
 A. There was a possibility, nothing further. 
 
 Q. You knew his mother was one of the worst cases, did 
 you not? 
 
 A. I did not at that time. 
 
 Q. Could not you by the slightest work have obtained that 
 information ? 
 
 A. I probably could if I had sought it. 
 
 Q. But you didn't try to, did you? 
 
 A. I did not. I will make a word of explanation here, with 
 the permission of the chairman, with reference to why I stated 
 (in the letter) that he should not have visited the bull. The 
 requirements of the law are that there should be diseased 
 animals in order to warrant a notice ; that that notice shall 
 come from the municipal officers to the Commissioners. I had 
 had this bull under my charge. The notice to me was that he 
 was a well bull, and all right in every respect. There was 
 only a possibility, a suspicion against him ; but the statement 
 was that he was all right, and, therefore, that was not a matter 
 for legal notice to the Commissioners, and hence my statement. 
 
63 
 
 Q. You say you had had the bull under your charge? 
 
 A. Under my notice. 
 
 Q. Under your charge as one of the members of the Cattle 
 Commission, do you mean? 
 
 A. No, sir, under my notice ; under my notice would have 
 been a better word, because I had had the bull under consid- 
 eration. 
 
 Q. Under your notice as a Cattle Commissioner? 
 
 A. No, sir, as an individual. 
 
 Q. You make that distinction all the way through, do you? 
 
 A. I make it now. 
 
 Q, Were you acting in respect to the Kent bull as a private 
 citizen, or as one of the Board of Cattle Commissioners? 
 
 A. In that letter to Dr. Bailey I was acting as a Commis- 
 sioner. 
 
 Q. And in your letter to Mr. Kent how were you acting? 
 
 A. As a private individual, as I was addressed by him. 
 
 Q. Then the way in which you act always depends upon the 
 method by which you arc addressed by those who write you 
 letters ? 
 
 A. I do not know about that. 
 
 Q. It did in this case ? 
 
 A. I stated in each case how I acted. 
 
 Q. In the letter to Dr. Bailey you said of the Kent bull it 
 was "none of our business?" 
 
 A. None of our business as Cattle Commissioners. 
 
 Q. Do you think the Cattle Commissioners have no "summary 
 powers" in such matters? 
 
 A. What do you mean by "summary powers?" 
 
 Q. What does the statute mean when it uses the word ? 
 
 A. I do not know. I ask for information. 
 
 Q. What is your construction of it? 
 
 A. I could not say. I could not tell what in law is under- 
 stood by "summary." 
 
 Q. Haven't any idea what "summary powers" means? 
 
 A. No, not definite. 
 
64 
 
 Q. Do jou mean to say you think the Cattle Commissioners 
 had no power to act in any case of diseased cattle unless the 
 municipal officers should call upon them so to do? . 
 
 A. Repeat that question. 
 
 Q. Do you think that the Board of Cattle Commissioners 
 had no power to deal with diseased animals in any way, or 
 those suspected of disease, unless notified by municipal offi- 
 cers of the town ? 
 
 A. The only exception that I would make to that is a herd 
 of stock belonging to the State. 
 
 Q. Otherwise they had no power? 
 
 A. Otherwise, in a town or municipality where the stock 
 belonged to a private individual, the Cattle Commissioners 
 have no power whatever to act in cases of disease unless 
 called upon by municipal officers. 
 
 Q. You are very positive in that position? 
 
 A. I am. 
 
 By Mr. Walton: 
 
 Q. Did I understand you that this letter (letter marked 
 "B") was written by you as a private individual to Mr. Kent? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Did you understand that he wrote to you as a private 
 individual asking your advice in regard to it? 
 
 A. I did. He addressed me as a brother Patron, that is, 
 a brother Granger. 
 
 Q. You wrote this upon one of your blanks as Secretary of 
 the Board of Agriculture ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, I was using that paper in all my Correspond- 
 ence, private and official, in various official directions. I 
 have Experiment Station headings to some of my paper, and 
 I sometimes use that. We have no official paper for the 
 Cattle Commission. 
 
 Q. Yes, but this is official paper for the Board of Agricul- 
 ture, is it not? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, but not the Cattle Commission. 
 
 Q. Certainly, but it is all the official paper you have ? 
 
 A. No, sir, I have some other official paper. 
 
65 
 
 Q. And in connection with the Board of Agriculture? 
 
 A. No, sir, in connection with the Experiment Station. 
 
 By Mr. Adams: 
 
 Q. Does not your office in the Board of Agriculture make 
 you an officer also of this Commission ? 
 
 A. 1 so understand it, yes, sir. This office as commis- 
 sioner is an ex-officio office. 
 
 Q. So that would be sufficient for official paper in that ca- 
 pacity ? 
 
 A. Perhaps so, but it was not so designed. It was designed 
 as an individual. 
 
 By Mr. O Ornish: 
 
 Q. Have you any official paper of the Board of Cattle Com- 
 missioners ? 
 
 A. I have not. 
 
 Q. Has not all your official correspondence as a member 
 of that board been upon this same paper upon which you 
 wrote to Mr. Kent? 
 
 A. I presume it has. 1 use that in nearly all of my cor- 
 respondence, private and official. 
 
 Q. In writing to other men do you raake the same distinc- 
 tion? and when you write to them and sign simply your own 
 name and without the word "Commissioner" under it, do you 
 understand that to be a private correspondence ? 
 
 A. Not necessarily so. Sometimes I sign officially and 
 sometimes I do not ; depends upon whom I am writing to. 
 
 Q. Then at the other end of the route, when the man re- 
 ceives that letter with that letter-head and your signature, he 
 has no means of knowing whether you are writing to him as 
 a Patron or as a member of the board, has he? 
 
 A. I do not know anything about what means he has ; he 
 has only the letter of course. 
 
 Q. So far as that goes, have you in any of your correspond- 
 ence in regard to this Kent bull ever signed your name as 
 "Commissioner on Contagious Diseases?" 
 
 A. I do not know. I may and may not. 
 
 5 
 
66 
 
 Q. You haven't been very particulai- about that? 
 
 A. No. I am very particuhir if I am taking any legal 
 action that it shall be a legal notice ; I am very particular 
 about that. 
 
 Q. Now, going back to the question of the power in the 
 board, you say you so construed the law, and still have no 
 idea as to the meaning of the words "summary powers" in 
 the statute? 
 
 A. I do not interpret the law for our action myself, I use 
 my judgment, but the interpretation of the law has been given 
 to me by higher authority than myself. Of course I had the 
 privilege of reading the law and using my judgment in regard 
 to what the law was, but it has been interpreted and defined 
 to us by higher authority. 
 
 Q. And using your own judgment upon it you so con- 
 strued it, although the words "summary powers" are in the 
 statute ? 
 
 A. I do not know whether "summary powers" are in the 
 Cattle Commission law or not. I presume the statute will 
 show. 
 
 3Ir. Haines: — "Summary orders." 
 
 Q. "Summary orders." Have you always maintained the 
 same position? 
 
 A. I have. I think I have. I have no recollection of 
 maintaining any different position. 
 
 (Letter dated April 13th, '^6, and marked "D" shown 
 witness.) 
 
 Q. Is that your signature and letter? 
 
 A. Looks like it ; 3^es, sir, that is mine. 
 
 (Mr. Cornish placed in evidence the letter marked "D," 
 which is as follows :) 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture, 
 
 North Greene, Apr. 13, 1886. 
 
 } 
 
 Dear Doctor: — Your letters were duly rec'd Monday evening. My 
 arrangements previously made are such that I cannot go down to Port- 
 land on Wednesday. I had planned to give some time to that matter next 
 
67 
 
 sveek, and to do it must have my time for other work this week. The 
 printers are at work on mj' annual report and / am obliged to keep them at 
 work. 
 
 I don't want to put our heroic treatment into effect at Orono till we have 
 letters from other authorities. Write to Billings and others and see what 
 they will say to the course we proposed. 
 
 I don't think you had better go down to Wesley till we have consulted 
 together. 
 
 Now in regard to scabby sheep. We must hold back about making ex- 
 pense for the State in such cases. It you are called by municipal officers 
 you better diagnose the disease and leave the matter right there with the 
 municipal officers to do further as tliey please. This will throw the whole 
 responsibility — further than a decision as to the nature of the disease — 
 on to the officers, wliere we want it. Sec. 88 of the law says, ''said offi- 
 cers may order them killed," etc. 
 
 Sect. 50 gives us the "power to issue summary orders'' but it does not 
 say we shall. So we will take the easy horn and let the municipal officers 
 do what they think best, when thpy and not ive must bear the responsi- 
 bility. I think this the proper course and by all means the best course. 
 I don't want to take the responsibility of making cost on little flocks ot 
 sheep or pens of pigs. You tell them the nature of the disease and let 
 them do as thej' please further. We must be careful how far we go, 
 
 Hastilj'^ yours, 
 
 (Signed) Gilbert. 
 
 You will not get this till after your interview with the Gov. I would 
 
 tike to know the tenor of it. 
 
 G. 
 
 Witness: — That was written to Dr. Bailey because I con- 
 sidered he had gone too far, and it was out of caution to him. 
 He had visited several flocks of sheep, and had ordered them 
 to be destroj'ed on his own responsibility singly, and they 
 were destroyed on that order. Scab in sheep is a curable 
 disease. We have no rights or authority as a commission to 
 destroy stock that is diseased with a curable disease. 
 
 Q. And is hog cholera a contagious disease ? 
 
 A. It is. 
 
 (Letter dated November 11th, '85, and marked "E" shown 
 witness.) 
 
 Q. Is that your hand writing? 
 
 A. It looks like it. 
 
 (Mr. Cornish read in evidence the letter marked "E" 
 which is as follows :) 
 
68 
 
 "E" 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture, ^ 
 
 North' Greene, Nov. 11, 18S5, J 
 
 Dr. Bailey: — Your bili was promptly attended to by me, and presented 
 in person. At one session since I wrote a letter calling attention to it. 
 At the last session they drew warrants for other matters, and I supposed 
 that had been attended to. I did not see the council at the last session, as 
 they were on a murder case while I was there. Have done all I could. 1 
 don't like the way we are treated and would resign if I could. I don't 
 lilve the business either. 
 
 In all cases of a call to us from municipal officers, please preserve the 
 call to file with your bill as authority for the action. 
 
 If I understand the Thorndike case we can do nothing for the parties. 
 
 In the cases of hog cholera at Saco, think the course is to let the author- 
 ities take care of the matter. You make your visits only on call, (for the 
 present at least) and pronounce upon the disease. Sec. 50 of the law gives 
 us the power to issue summary orders, but it is left to us to judge whether 
 public safety requires it, aTid unless it does we are in no way obliged to 
 act. If at anj' time we find the municipal officers are neglecting to pro- 
 tect the public then it becomes our duty to do it ourselves. So you diag- 
 nose the disease when called upon, and if the officers think it best to prize 
 and kill, let them do it and collect the damage. If we find them negligent 
 and public interests not protected, then we will step in and handle the 
 matter ourselves. This throws the responsibility upon them, and we are 
 to take it only when we are obliged to. 
 
 I go to Boston to-morrow and wish I could stop off at P., but caiuiot. 
 
 If you want me to stop over a train when I come back on Tuesday next — 
 
 at Saco or Portland— write me at 13 School St., Boston. I M'ill telegraph 
 
 you to strike me on noon train at Woodford's, and if it finds you at home 
 
 we will consult. 
 
 Yours, 
 
 (Signed) Gilbert. 
 
 Witness : — My explanation of that is that in regard to these 
 unimportant matters where the public safety was all right it 
 was better to leave them in the hands of the municipal officers, 
 where the law allows them to be, and let them take care of 
 them. They could do it cheaper, easier and better than we 
 could. That was my idea in these unimportant matters where 
 the public safety was not jeopardized. 
 
 Q. Do you think if a case of tuberculosis is brought to your 
 notice aa cattle commissioner, and you learn that it exists in 
 
69 
 
 a certain town in this State, that you cannot move one peg 
 unless the municipal officers see fit to notify you? 
 
 A. 1 do think so. I have been so instructed by the Governor 
 and Council of this State. 
 
 Q. And you have always acted in that way? 
 
 A. No. There is one exception. 
 Q. 1 mean, except the College? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, I think so. I do not recollect any case in 
 which we have not alwa3's acted in that way. 
 
 Q. Now after this matter was brought to the attention of 
 your board by this notice from the selectmen of Bucksport, 
 did you then think that the Cattle Commissioners of this State 
 ought to take hold of that matter? 
 
 A. I did not. 
 
 Q. Why? 
 
 A. Because that bull was a well bull. 
 
 Q. What information had you as to that? 
 
 A. I hud the information from the owner of the bull. 
 
 Q. Do you take the information of the letter which you 
 have described here giving the outward appearance of the 
 bull, written to you, as you say, a brother Patron, in place 
 of the official notice given to j^ou in July as a member of the 
 board of Cattle Commissioners? 
 
 A. Official notice was given to Dr. Bailey. 
 
 Q. He was one of the board ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir; and he went to visit them in accordance with 
 that notice. 
 
 Q. Then would you let that letter which you received the 
 previous April, as you say a private individual, supersede the 
 official notice which came to your board ? 
 
 A. My knowledge of that animal was that he was a well 
 Huimal. I had no other knowledge in regard to that animal, 
 and consequently that was my position. 
 
 Q. Did you have any other knowledge except what was con- 
 tained in that first letter written to you by Mr. Kent? 
 
 A. When? 
 
 Q. In April previous. 
 
70 
 
 A. At the time the letter was written, do you mean? 
 
 Q. When this letter came to your board from Mr. Mc- 
 Alister, selectman of the town of Bucksport, did you at that 
 time have any notice of the real condition of that bull other 
 than what was contained in the letter from Mr. Kent of the 
 previous April? 
 
 A. I do not know that I had. 
 
 Q. And that letter, you say, was written to you not offi- 
 cially, but as a member of the Patrons? 
 
 A. I say so. 
 
 Q. And you allowed that letter to supersede this official 
 notice given to you as a member of the board ? Is that so ? 
 
 A. No, I do not understand it so. 
 
 Q. Didn't you take what you say were the statements in 
 that letter in preference to what was contained in this notice? 
 
 A. I do not recollect what was in the notice. 
 
 Q. Did you ever visit the bull? 
 
 A. Never. I never visited the bull because I never was 
 notified he was diseased. 
 
 Q. Did you concur in your associate's visiting that bull? 
 
 A. The letter says I did not. 
 
 Q. You did not approve of his course then ? 
 
 A. Yes, I did approve of it. I think I wrote to him saying 
 that under the notice to him he was justified in visiting the 
 bull. But the notice was — I do not know how to express it, 
 but I should say it was a sort of spring, one of those springs 
 that have been attempted a good many times on the Commis- 
 sion to get an official diagnosis of a disease at the expense of 
 the State in an individual case. 
 
 Q. And you were very glad to have that suspicion in this 
 case, were you not? 
 
 A. I do not know. 
 
 Q. The only information you had was from the previous 
 letter written to you as a Patron? 
 
 A. That is all I recollect now. 
 
 Q. Still, you neglected to take any part in the investigation 
 of the Kent bull case as an officer? 
 
71 
 
 A. No, sir. Dr. Bailey went down there and visited;pro- 
 fessionally, the same us in all cases of disease. 
 
 Q. At your request ? 
 
 A. On his own responsibility, as he frequently did. 
 
 Q. Did you approve of his action after he did it? 
 
 A. I was a good deal — 
 
 Q. Did you approve of his action after he did it? 
 
 A. I did. 
 
 Q. And thought that he had a perfect right to go there? 
 
 A. I thought under the call he received that it was hi» 
 duty to answer that call. 
 
 Q. Didn't you tell Mr. Ferguson in the State House this 
 winter that he had no business to ijro there? 
 
 A. I do not think I did. At least, I do not know why I 
 should, because I think I had previously written to Bailey 
 that he was justified in visiting the bull under the notice he 
 received. I do not recollect that I told jNIr. Ferguson that. 
 I would swear that I have no recollection of telling him so. 
 
 By Mr. Lihby : 
 
 Q. What was the result? Was the bull called sound? 
 
 A. Immediately after the visit of Dr. Bailey to the Kent 
 bull he wrote me of his visit, and this is the letter: "Port- 
 land, August 8, 1886. "Dear Gilbert : I inclose to you some 
 documents that I deemed of sufficient importance to receive 
 my prompt attention, and went to Bucksport on Wednesday 
 and met McAlister, who took me to Kent's place. The latter 
 is a farmer with a large stock of cows from which he supplies 
 the city with milk, and he also keeps a bull for pul)lic service. 
 This bull he purchased at Orono, and he is apparently a well 
 animal with a normal temperament and sound lungs as far as 
 can be tes'ted by percussion, and is about a year old." That 
 is all that relates to the bull. 
 
 By Mr. Cornish : 
 
 Q. Do you know whether or not Dr. Bailey corresponded 
 with Mr. Gowell after that as to the lineage of this animal? 
 
 A. He said he did. 
 
72 
 
 Q. Did Dr. Bailey write a letter inclosing that reply from 
 Gowell ? 
 
 A. Dr. Bailey informed me that he had corresponded with 
 Gowell and found that the bull was calved by one of the 
 cows killed at the College, one of the diseased cows. 
 
 (Letter marked "F" shown witness.) 
 
 Q. Is that the letter you received inclosed, do you think? 
 
 A. I can tell by reading it through. Dr. Bailey informed 
 me to that effect. 
 
 Q. Didn't he inclose a letter from Mr. Gowell? 
 
 A. I cannot tell you. He informed me of the fact. 
 
 (Mr. Cornish read in evidence letter marked "F," as fol- 
 lows :) 
 
 Orono, Aug. 9, 1886. 
 
 Dear Doctor: — The dam of the young bull was Princess Alba, one of the 
 two cows we slaughtered in the tield near the stable, and whose lungs and 
 glands you brought into the stable. She was one of the worst cases. You 
 doubtless remember her condition now. Lungs and glands badly off. 
 
 I am confined to the house bj' sickness and am writing to you with ex- 
 treme difficulty. 
 
 Most truly, 
 
 (Signed) G. M. Gowell. 
 
 "Princess Alba" was the dam of the "Kent bull'" whose lungs I refer 
 
 to, sent to the American Vet. College. 
 
 G. H. B. 
 
 (Letter marked "G" shown witness.) 
 «Q. Is that your hand writing? 
 A. It is. 
 
 (Mr. Cornish read in evidence letter marked "G," as fol- 
 lows :) 
 
 "G" 
 
 Statk of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture, ) 
 
 North Greene, Aug. 13, 1886. ) 
 Dr. Bailey : 
 
 Dear Sir : — We haven't the ghost of a law that will authorize us to inter- 
 ere with that animal. If Mr. K. don't think the animal safe to use, it is his 
 business, not ours. Besides, "a decision that the animal was unsound wheu 
 bought binds the College to refund." 
 
 Remember, the College cattle were the State's property and we did not 
 apply the law at all. 
 
73 
 
 We can't do airything but let the animal alone just where he is, and not 
 complicate ourselves with it. It is our only way. 
 
 I suppose we better square off with Scribner and settle the matter up. 
 He can get more for those cattle to sell them for beef, and he better do it. 
 
 You see Locke and see what he says about it. The sooner we attend to 
 it the better. The Gov. is gone, and you ask Looke if we better wait till 
 he returns or go ahead as soon as we can arrange the matter. liet me 
 know as soon as you can. 
 
 Yours, 
 
 (Signed) Gilbert. 
 
 Q. You were a trustee of the College, were you not? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. And one of the farm committee of the Colles^e? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. And had been instrumental in purchasing this whole 
 herd ? 
 
 A. Directly and indirectly. 
 
 Q. Largely so, had you not? 
 
 A. No, sir. 
 
 Q. You and Gowell together? 
 
 A. We made one purchase together. 
 
 Q. Did you make any alone ? 
 
 A. No, sir. 
 
 Q. Advise as to purchases? 
 
 A. I presume so, as we had a perfect understanding with 
 riach other in regard to all these matters. 
 
 Q. Did you have another letter from Dr. Bailey on the 22d 
 •«)f October? 
 
 A. I presume so ; I had a good many from him. 
 
 Q. Can you find that as readily as you found the last one 
 you produced? 
 
 A. I do not know. 1 may have it here and I may not. 
 Here is one dated October 23d. 
 
 Q. Yes, sir. Will you read that to the committee? 
 
 (Witness reads letter dated October 23d, '86, and marked 
 -«H," as follows :) 
 
74 
 
 Portland, Oct. 23, 1886. 
 
 Dear Sir : — I am in receipt of two letters this morning, one from Dau- 
 forth, that satisfies me that they have no ''contagious disease"' among 
 their horses, and I do not propose to go. So. knowing no business East. 
 I will go to Oroiio almost any day that I can be of service there. The 
 other letter is trom Mr. McAlister, Bueksport, in answer to my enquiry 
 if Mr. Kent would consent to have his bull killed, without the interven- 
 tion of the cattle commissioners, and he replied by saying: '"If the State 
 will give $25.00 the bull shall be disposed of and I will pay the rest of 
 the bills myself. I make this proposition that the future of the com- 
 munity may be safe." 
 
 Please answer at once what you have to say to tliis proposition, as the 
 Governor has said to me lately, "consult Gilbert." I have to request of 
 you that you will return to me three letters, which I recently enclosed to 
 you; one from Mr. Scribner, the rest from Mr. Gowell, in answer to my 
 enquirj' regarding the cow '"Princess Alba," and last the postal from Mr. 
 Cliase in regard to the sale of cattle at Scribner's. 
 
 Mr. Ferguson called on me the next morning after our meeting, and 
 told me he had seen Governor Robie in relation to his serving out the re- 
 mainder of the year, (or until after the report of the commissioners was 
 made up) and that the Governor had -'promised him he should be continued 
 in office, and would forward him papers to that effect." As far as I am 
 concerned all this "backing and filling" has ceased to interest me, and I 
 have no further objections to offer. Please let me know when you write 
 if the appraisal and settlement at Scribner's is satisfactory to you, and if 
 you are to be at home the coming week. 
 
 I am very truly yours, 
 
 (Signed) Geo. H. Bailey, V. S. 
 
 (Mr. Cornish proposed to read the McAlister letter in- 
 closed in the letter of October 23d, but Mr. Gilbert raised 
 the point that it had not been identified. The letter was 
 then identified by Dr. Bailey and it was read in evidence by 
 Mr. Cornish, being marked "I," as follows :) 
 
 "I" 
 
 Bueksport, October 22d, '86. 
 
 My dear Sir: — Yours of the 21st inst. rec'd, and contents noted. I 
 
 fully appreciate your position in the case of Mr. Kent of this town and 
 
 will co-operate with you and have the bull killed. Now if the State will 
 
 give $25 the bull shall be disposed of and I will pay the rest of the bills 
 
 myself. I make this proposition that the future of the community may 
 
 be safe. 
 
 Respectfully yours, 
 
 (Signed) G. W. McAlister. 
 
75 
 
 p. S. Mr. Kent wishes to get rkl of the bull at once as he is to a great 
 
 deal of trouble keeping the animal up. 
 
 McAHster. 
 
 Q. Did you reply to Dr. Bailey, aiul have you your reply? 
 
 A. I have a letter here dated October 27th, which I think 
 is a reply to that letter. 
 
 Q. May I look at it ? 
 
 A. No. 
 
 Q. You refuse to allow me to look at that letter r 
 
 A. I do until I read it. (Witness reading letter to him- 
 self.) 
 
 Q. Do you refuse to allow me to look at that letter? 
 
 A. I do. I am dealing with the committee and not you. 
 
 Q. And you refuse to allow me to look at the letter? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. The letter is mine, written by me, and I will 
 read it. 
 
 (AVitness reads letter dated October 27th, 'SQ, and marked 
 ««J,"as follows:) 
 
 "J" 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture, ) 
 
 North Greene, October 27th, 1S86. i 
 
 Dr. Bailey : — I supposed Mr. Bell would consult you on that unfinished 
 business after you liad heard from the parties again. 
 
 I am still wliere I have been in the ujatter. and being there, know of 
 no C()mpromise ground I wish to take. If you and Mr. Bell decile dif- 
 ferently from my views I must yield to the majority, but not convinced. 
 
 In view of the fact that the public avIII not use his bull, will not Mr 
 Kent, with your advice, feed him oft" for beef? 
 
 The settlement with Scribner was satisfactory all around. 
 
 Yours, 
 
 (Signed) Gilbert 
 
 Q. You notified Bell and Ferguson to meet you at the City 
 Hotel in Portland hist October, the 20th ? 
 A. I did. 
 
 Q. And you met them there ? 
 A. I did, or they met me there. 
 
76 
 
 Q. Did you take them up into your room before going 
 over to Dr. Bailey's? 
 
 A. I presume I did. We met there for the transaction of 
 business, and I suppose I should take them to a room. 
 
 Q. Did you have any conversation with them as to what 
 Dr. Bailey proposed to say in his report? 
 
 A. I have no special recollection in regard to it, but I pre- 
 sume we did. 
 
 Q. Did you try to influence those gentlemen at all as to 
 which side they should take? 
 
 A. No. 
 
 Q. Not the slightest? 
 
 A. Not in the least. My statement to the Commission 
 was to this efl'ect : Dr. Bailey had been sick ; he hadn't fully 
 recovered. He was in a weak condition. I thought to save 
 him the trouble of a full discussion of this matter by getting 
 together ourselves and by ourselves talking the matter over 
 before going to him, and that was my request and purpose — 
 that we might have an understanding between ourselves and 
 thus tax him less than otherwise would be the case. 
 
 Q. Then your motive in taking those gentlemen to your 
 room and talking the matter over in advance was simply a 
 humane one for Dr. Bailey? 
 
 A. A humane one for him in connection with the necessity 
 for talking over business while and when we were present 
 there in Portland at the meeting which was called for that 
 purpose. 
 
 Q. And to save Dr. Bailey the worry of things was the 
 only object you had, then? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Did you represent to those associates that Dr. Bailey 
 had taken grounds that you did not approve of? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Did you represent to them that you hoped they would 
 agree with you ? 
 
 A. I do not know whether 1 did or not ; I presume I did 
 hope so. 
 
77 
 
 Q. Did you communicate the fact to them? 
 A. I should suppose I did ; I do not know. 
 Q. Did you communicate the fact to them that that was 
 the reason you took them up to the room so as to have them 
 forewarned and so forearmed? 
 A. No ; no recollection of it. 
 
 Q. Have you the letter from Dr. Bailey with the proposi- 
 tion to make your reports this year? 
 
 A. I haven't it. I took only those relating to the subject 
 matter under discussion here, under the investigation. 
 
 Q. And you did not take the correspondence relating to 
 the reports? 
 
 A. No, sir; only relating to the subject under discussion, 
 Q. Would not the "doings" of the Commissioners come 
 under the clause "relating to the doings of the Commis- 
 sioners" ? 
 
 A. Relating to this? — no, not at all. 
 Q. You construed it in that way ? 
 A. I did. 
 
 Q. And therefore did not bring those letters ? 
 A. I did not. I was not requested to bring any letters ; 
 but I did bring those relating to the wording of the order, all 
 voluntarily on my part. 
 
 (Letter dated Dec. 21st, '86, and marked "K" shown wit- 
 ness.) 
 
 Q. Is that the letter which you wrote to Dr. Bailey in 
 reply to his proposition ? 
 
 A. It is ray writing. That is my signature and my writ- 
 ing. 
 
 (Witness looking through the letter.) 
 
 Q. Is that the letter ? 
 
 A. I presume it is. 
 
 Q. Don't you know it is ? 
 
 A. No, I cannot tell until I read it. 
 
 Mr. Lihhy : — Look at it and see. 
 
78 
 
 Q. Look at it until you have found out whether it is or 
 not ; look at it sufficiently long enough to tell whether it is 
 your letter or not. 
 
 A. T cannot tell. I will see, getting along with it as fast 
 as I can. 
 
 Q. I ask if that is your letter? [after a pause] You do 
 not propose to answer my question as to whether that is your 
 letter until you have read it through? Is that your proposi- 
 tion? You do not propose to answer whether that is your 
 letter or not until you have read it all through? 
 
 A. I have o:ot other business on hand. Mr. Libbv, a mem- 
 her of this committee, has asked me to look at this and see. 
 
 Q. Will you or not state whether that is your letter l>efore 
 you have read it entirely through to know its contents? 
 
 A. I am satisfied that is my letter. 
 
 Q. How long have you been satisfied that that is your 
 letter? 
 
 A. Long enough to answer it. 
 
 (Mr. Cornish read in evidence the letter dated Dec. 21st, 
 and marked "K," as follows :) 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Boartl of Agriculture, 1 
 
 North Greene, December 21, 188G. / 
 
 Dr. Bailey:—! have only a few minutes at command this morning and 
 in that time state briefly just how far the law will justify the Commission 
 in going, in my interpretation of it. 
 
 The law gives us no police powers whatever. 
 
 0)1 appearance of disease whicli the municipal authorities /ear endangers 
 public interests they are to call upon us. 
 
 If we And contagious disease we are authorized to take charge of same. 
 If not, we stop right there. 
 
 Just there we meet the Kent bull case ; you found the bull soimd, so 
 there our jurisdiction under the law stops, and we have no further busi- 
 ness with the case. 
 
 So far the legal bearings of the case, and I want you to repeat to 
 Gov. just what we have been doing as a Commission, and when you have 
 told the story of our work, stop. 
 
 I know as well as you there is a bearing beyond this, but it leads us as 
 a Commission where we cannot go. Yes, and it leads us into that which 
 
79 
 
 iias no end. We cannot surround and exterminate this disease. It is all 
 around at the ])resent time. I have just found where there has a valuable 
 bull died with it onlj' a few weeks ago, and a cow not long since, and 
 where there is another cow that will die soon. You can never report we 
 are free from it. Further it is the height of folly, knowing tliese things, 
 to single out those College bulls and recommend their destruction for 
 public security, when there is the same danger lurking in the same way 
 all around us. 
 
 There is still another view which we, as a Commission, must not over- 
 look, whether professional honor and reputation are jeopardized or not. 
 How long would it take to raise a good sized earthquake here in our 
 State if we strike out here and there killing animals well in all outward 
 appearances? I tell you, Doctor, we can accomplish far moie bj' restrict- 
 ing our work tiian we can by taking but a single step that the law does 
 not pl.Hinly require. 
 
 Ilastilj' 5'ours, 
 
 (Signed) Gilbert. 
 
 Witness: — I indorse every word of that and stand hy it at 
 tiiis time, and put it in as evidence. 
 
 Q. Now, at that time how many other cases of tuberculosis 
 in this State did 30U know of? 
 
 A, I have known of cases — 
 
 Q. At that time how many did you know? 
 
 A. I have known of cases in this State for 10 or 15 years 
 back. 
 
 Q. How many at that time, when you wrote that letter, did 
 you know existed in this State? 
 
 A. I had just been informed at that time of the death of 
 a bull which was shown at both of our State fairs last fall. 
 
 Q. What other? 
 
 A. 1 had also been informed of the death of a cow. 
 
 Q. What other? 
 
 A. I had also been informed of another cow that was ema- 
 ciated. 
 
 Q. A poor cow ? 
 
 A. That was emaciated from a disease which to all appear- 
 ance was that disease. 
 
 Q. How many more? 
 
 A. That is all that I have iu mind that were meant or re- 
 ferred to in that letter. 
 
80 
 
 Q. Those three are all you had in mind at the time you 
 wrote that letter? 
 
 A. I think so. 
 
 Q. Did you know of any other cases existing in the State 
 at that time besides those three? 
 
 A. No, I do not recollect of any. 
 
 Q. What became of the Kent bull? 
 
 A. Dr. Bailey stated, and Mr. McAlister stated, that they 
 killed him. I do not know what became of him. 
 
 Q. When did you first learn or hear the report that he was 
 dead? 
 
 A. I first learned of the fact by a statement of Dr. Bailey. 
 I had heard previous to that time, a gentleman had told me 
 that he had heard, that the bull was killed. 
 
 Q. Prior to that time that was the only information ? 
 
 A. That was all the information I had. 
 
 Q. Who was that gentleman ? 
 
 A. Mr. Whitmore of Verona. 
 
 Q. He is a member of the legislature ? 
 
 A. He is, I believe. 
 
 Q. Did you not, after that conversation with Mr. Whitmore, 
 state to the Committee on Agriculture here one day that yoU' 
 didn't know anything about where the Kent bull was? 
 
 A. No, I did not state it in those words exactly. I said I 
 didn't know what had become of the bull. 
 
 Q. When you used the word "know" you stood upon the 
 technical meaning of the term ? 
 
 A. I did, as though I was giving testimony. 
 
 Q. Personal knowledge? 
 
 A. Yes, as I was before a committee. 
 
 Q. But prior to that time you had heard from two different 
 sources ? 
 
 A. No. 
 
 Q. From one source ? 
 
 A. From one source. 
 
 Q. That he had been killed ? 
 
 A. I had heard that he had heard that he had been killed. 
 
81 
 
 Q. Did yon have any icatson to doubt that? 
 
 A. No, 1 hadn't any reason to doubt that he had heard .so. 
 
 Q. Have you ever seen a report of the interview in the 
 Lewiston Journal — 
 
 A. No, sir. 
 
 Q. — with you ? 
 
 A. No, sir. 
 
 Q. And as copied into other papers and the Home Farm ? 
 
 A. No, sir, I haven't seen the Home Farm for four weeks. 
 
 Q. Have you ever seen the printed account of that inter- 
 view with yourself!? 
 
 A. I would have it understood that I ;nn not responsible 
 for newspapers. 
 
 Q. I simply ask if you have read it and if you sanction it? 
 
 A. I have answered ; I haven't read it. 
 
 (i. Haven't read it? 
 
 A. I haven't read the Home Farm. 
 
 Mr. Cornish: — I will read the words from the paper. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert (to the chairman) : — Is a newspaper article 
 to be introduced here as evidence? 
 
 Mr. Walton: — O, no, not at all. That newspaper article 
 cannot be used as evidence in this case. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — I do not offer it for that. ' 
 
 Q. Did you have any interview with any one purporting to 
 be a correspondent of the Lewiston Journal ? 
 
 A. When and where? 
 
 Q. At any time this winter? 
 
 A. Yes, I have seen correspondents of the Lewiston 
 Journal very frequently, and I have had some conversation 
 with the gentleman before you. 
 
 Q. Mr. Dingley ? 
 
 A. And also had some conversation with Harry Andrews. 
 
 Q. Did you authorize either of the correspondents of the 
 Lewiston Journal to publish any statement of yours that you 
 made in this interview? 
 
 A. I authorized — 
 
82 
 
 Mr. Walton: — If you want to ask the witness if he made 
 such and such statements to any one 1 think, as one of the 
 committee, I shall allow you to do it ; but I do not care about 
 whether he has authorized anybody to publish his statement 
 or not. 
 
 Q. Did you state to any correspondent of the Lewiston 
 Journal or any])ody else as follows, or substantially as fol- 
 lows : "I hold that the law gave the Cattle Commissioners no 
 power to take up the Kent bull after he had been pronounced 
 sound, without a call from the municipal authorities, and gave 
 us no liberty to interfere with the other bulls without a call 
 from the nuinicipal authorities. Last October the Commis- 
 sioners met in Portland. There Ferguson and Bailey of the 
 Commission told me that they agreed with me in my inter- 
 pretation of the law." Did you ever make that statement? 
 
 A. Does your question cover all you have read ? 
 
 Q. Yes, sir. 
 
 A. It is most too much to answer at once. I cannot retain 
 that in my mind so as to give an intelligent answer. 
 
 Q. "I hold that the law gave the Cattle Commissioners no 
 power to take up the Kent bull after he had been pronounced 
 sound"? 
 
 A. I did hold it then ; I hold it now. 
 
 Q. *'And gave us no liberty to interfere with the other 
 bulls without a call from municipal authorities"? 
 
 A. I did, and hold that now, and here state it. 
 
 Q. "Last October the Commissioners met in Portland." 
 Did you state that ? 
 
 A. What I supposed to be the Commissioners ; yes, what 
 was left of them came to Portland, and also Mr. Ferguson 
 and Dr. Bailey. 
 
 Q. "There Ferguson and Bailey of the Commission told 
 me that they agreed with me in my interpretation of the law"? 
 
 A. Ferguson told me, and he has testified so standing there. 
 
 Q. Whether you have stated that Ferguson and Bailey 
 agreed with you in your interpretation of the law, at the 
 Portland meeting? 
 
 I 
 
83 
 
 A. Yes, I so understood it. 
 
 Q. "And since that time, Mr. INIcAlister, chairman of the 
 selectmen of Biicksport, has told me that he agrees with me"? 
 
 A. Yes, I made that statement. 
 
 Q. Did you hear Mr. McAlistcr's statement last night? 
 
 A. I did. I met him on the train, going up on the train. 
 He is an old acquaintance of mine, and I talked various mat- 
 ters over with him, and among the rest we talked about the 
 Kent bull. We went over the history of the case and into 
 the matter, and in the course of the conversation I alluded 
 to the fact that I understood that the jurisdiction of the law 
 ceased when the veterinary of the Commission pronounced 
 the bull sound. And I understood him to accede to that. I 
 am ready to swear that I honestly and truly understood him 
 to accede to that. And he further said then : "I agree with 
 you there ; but it belonged to the trustees of the College to 
 take care of the bull." "Very well," said I, "the College 
 trustees never have been called upon to take care of that bull 
 to my knowledge." 
 
 Q. You heard McAlister's statement here last night, did 
 you ? 
 
 A. I did. 
 
 Q. That he didn't agree with you, and didn't intend to say 
 anything to that purport? 
 
 A. I heard that statement, and was very much surprised at 
 it. 
 
 Q. Now, will you produce to the committee all the other 
 letters and correspondence which you have had with the Cattle 
 Commissioners ? 
 
 A. I will if they ask me to or request it of me. 
 
 Mr. Walton: — The order requires us to call for all the cor- 
 respondence. 
 
 Witness: — Mine you have here, and it is for you. 
 
 By Mr. Walton : 
 
 Q. Is this all the correspondence you have? 
 
84 
 
 A. T have got some here in my pocket. It is all the cor- 
 respondence relating to this cattle aftair and to the action of 
 the Commission connected therewith. 
 
 Q. Can you not produce the letter sent to you by Mr. 
 Kent? 
 
 A. I do not think I can. As I have said before, my private 
 correspondence is not filed, whereas, all my official correspond- 
 ence is filed, and I can go and draw upon it any time. 
 
 Bij Mr. Rich: 
 
 Q. Do you think you have been as vigilant as you ought to 
 have been in looking after this disease ? 
 
 A. Mr. Chairman, in reply to that we haven't auy police 
 powers whatever. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Answer the question. 
 
 A. I do. That is my answer to him. 
 
 Q. (By Mr. Rich.) I asked you if you thought you had 
 been as vigilant as you ought in looking after this disease ? 
 
 A. I do. That was my answer. 
 
 By Mr. Haines: 
 
 Q. Did ever anybody raise any objection to it? 
 
 A. No. As I said before, the Governor and Council gave 
 us definite instructions in regard to these matters and in re- 
 gard to this law when we had the foot and mouth disease under 
 consideration. We consulted them in every detail, and they 
 gave us instructions, and the legal gentlemen of his Council 
 at the time from whom those instructions emanated, were 
 Bolster of Auburn and Locke of Portland. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Whose Council ? 
 
 A. Governor Robie's Council. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM B. FERGUSON, resumed. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert asked me if I thought we should be justified 
 in killing well cattle. I said, No. So much I agreed with 
 him ; but that does not imply that I agreed with him in other 
 points. I think that should the Commissioner? find diseased 
 animals they would have authority to kill them. For instance. 
 
85 
 
 if the Cattle Commissioners should find a glandered horse 
 being used in the streets of this city, I think the law would 
 justify and uphold them in destroying that animal, municipal 
 officers or no municipal officers. That is my position. 
 
 By Mr Walton : 
 
 Q. And did you claim you could act in such a case 
 without notice from the municipal officers? 
 
 A. I do claim that. 
 
 Q. And to Mr. Gilbert? 
 
 A. If that point was raised at all; I do not jemembor 
 whether it was raised or not ; I would not say it was not. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF W. H. JORDAN. 
 
 I am director of the Experiment Station. On my way to 
 Augusta yesterday I learned that an animal had been killed 
 near Bangor the day before, and from what the party owning 
 the animal said to the gentleman who gave me the informa- 
 tion I judged it was probably a case of tuberculosis. I 
 stepped ofl' of the train at Waterville, thinking this would be 
 a matter of a good deal of interest in this investigation, and 
 telegraphed to a gentleman who is a friend of mine to forward 
 portion of lungs to me at Augusta, and also send statement 
 as to breed of cow. He sent the lungs, which I will produce, 
 an<l this statement in regard to the breed of cow : "This cow 
 was ten years old and the party I purchased her of two years 
 ago said he bought her mother of Dr. North, of Augusta, 
 when a calf. That is all I know of it." 
 
 Q. A Jersey ? 
 
 A. Yes. Wishing to know whether the cow had had any 
 contact with College cattle in any way, I telegraphed to Mr. 
 Miller this. "Within four years was dead cow ever served b}^ 
 J. C. Green's bull, Bangor City Farm l)ull, or W. Hall's bull," 
 those being the three bulls in his vicinity that he could get 
 at. I received from him this reply : "She never was served 
 by any one of those bulls ; never had an}' College stock. W. 
 C. Miller." The gentleman lives in Bangor and has a farm 
 
86 
 
 three miles beyond on the other side of the College. I sent 
 this telegram with the purpose of getting information as to 
 whether the cow had had any relation to the College stock 
 whatever, and I believe this information shows that she had 
 not. 
 
 Q. Who owned that cow ? 
 
 A. W. C. Miller, who lives on the other side of Bangor 
 from the College, being about eleven miles from the College. 
 
 Q. Lives in Bangor? 
 
 A. I think his farm is within the city limits two miles and 
 a half or three miles out of the city. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF Z. A. GILBERT, resumed. 
 
 By Mr. Oak: 
 
 Q. To your knowledge had either of those three last ani- 
 mals you described, the bull which died, the cow which died 
 and cow which was greatly emaciated, any connection, close 
 or remote, with the College herd? 
 
 A. Not at all. They were over in the western pait of the 
 State. 
 
 (The lungs of the animal testified to by W. H. Jordan 
 were brought in and exhibited to the committee.) 
 
 Thursday, March 3, 1887. 
 
 Frank E. Southard, Esq., of Augusta, appeared as counsel 
 for Mr. Gilbert at this meeting. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF Z. A. GILBERT, resumed. 
 
 I think I could facilitate business and state it more rapidly 
 than it could be drawn out by question alone, or by questions 
 and answers alone ; and if it will be just as satisfactory, I 
 think I can make it just as intelligible. 
 
 Mr. Walton: — If you will do it without arguing your case, 
 Mr. Gilbert, as you go along, it will be all right. 
 
87 
 
 Mr. Gilbert: — I will thank the committee at any time, if 
 I am not pursuing the proper course, or am not as phiin or 
 definite as I should be, to prompt me. 
 
 Mr Walton: — Well, now you can go on and state it. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert: — I will say there was one matter that I was 
 not questioned upon, which I will refer to, — and that was my 
 connection with the farm committee of the College trustees. 
 I have been on the Board of Trustees of the State College 
 for seven years. Immediately upon my assuming those duties, 
 or having them laid upon me, I was, at the first meeting, I 
 think, chosen a member of the farm committee. Associated 
 with me at that time were the Hon. A. M. Robinson, of 
 Dexter, and the Hon. W. P. VYiugate, of Bangor. Later on 
 there were changes in the Board of Trustees. Mr. Wingate 
 dropped ofl\ and Judge Bean, of Readfield, came on the 
 board and was elected a member of the farm committee. 
 Then Judge Bean dropped off and Mr. Daniel H. Thing, of 
 Mount Vernon, took his place as trustee and was elected in 
 his place as one of the committee. Since that time Hon. 
 Mr. Parkhurst has been placed on that committee, and also, 
 at the last meeting, I think. General Shepherd of Skowhegan ; 
 and this committee is composed now of myself and those 
 two. The business of this farm committee was simply to 
 look after the reofulations of the Board of Trustees as bearing 
 upon the farm itself as a department of the institution. You 
 will bear in mind that this farm is a department of the Col- 
 lege. It is not distinct in any other respect ; it is a depart- 
 ment, the same as the mechanical department, and the other 
 departments. Consequently, all of the business arrangements 
 were made in the Board of Trustees, and this farm com- 
 mittee were delegated to see that they were carried out. And 
 the farm committee reported their doings, from time to time, 
 to the Board of Trustees in session at the College, whenever 
 they were together acting as a joint board of trustees. 
 
 Mr. Gowell, the farm superintendent, was placed in charge 
 of the farm as its superintendent at the time stated. I think 
 it was in the spring of 1882. His duties were to superintend 
 
the work of the farm, carry on the work under plans defined 
 and conveyed to him by the farm committee. 
 
 Mr. Walton ; — You mean communicated to him, not con- 
 veyed ? 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — Yes, — communicated to him by the farm 
 committee. And it was their business to see that the}^ were 
 carried out in conformity with directions. For that purpose 
 they visited it at the regular meetings of the trustees twice 
 a year ; and had an extra meeting of the farm committee, 
 usually, I believe, every year, in the spring of the year, to lay 
 out the plans for the season. As the regular meeting of the 
 Board of Trustees occurs the last week in November, it was 
 always thought best to visit him at a special meeting. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Now, Mr. Gilbert, will you be as brief as 
 possible, and come to the point bearing on this case? 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — Well, I thought this matter was brought up 
 here. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Well, it came up incidentally, and you can 
 state it in that way, but no other. 
 
 3Ir. Gilbert : — I do not care particularly about stating it. 
 
 Mr. Walton: — You can proceed. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — Mr. Gowell carried on the farm, and he was 
 required to keep an account of stock and take an account of 
 it twice a year on that farm and keep it carefully recorded. 
 He was required to keep a full set of accounts, and those ac- 
 counts were examined by this farm committee every time 
 they had a meeting at the College — always twice a year, and 
 sometimes, usually, three times or more. And also care was 
 taken to examine the bills and accounts and all vouchers, to 
 see that everything was correctly drawn. This was a critical 
 examination and carried on without any exception in any year. 
 
 The question of raising money to carry on the business of 
 the farm was referred to. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — I do not understand that there has been 
 even a suggestion made here that the business of the College 
 has not been propeily carried on, by the farm committee and 
 the other trustees, excejjting, incidentally perhaps, such a 
 
89 
 
 suggestion has been made that when this disease was dis- 
 covered there was not such care taken as should have been. 
 I hardly see how we can sit listening to the fact as to how the 
 business is conducted at that College. The assumption is 
 that it was conducted properly. Now, if you in your dis- 
 closures here should happen to state something that would 
 lead us to think that it was not conducted properly, you 
 might hurt your case. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — Trust me for that. However, I do not care 
 to refer to it if you do not want it to come in. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — I have no objection to your making this 
 statement, but the only question we raise is this : We are 
 here to investigate a condition of things — well, w'e will say 
 we are here to investigate tuberculosis. Now, anything that 
 can l)e said in that connection is proper. For the benefit of 
 all, I will read the order that we are acting under — or Mr. 
 Chairman [Senator Allen] will read it, as I have not my 
 glasses. 
 
 (Senator Allen here read the order.) 
 
 Mr. Southard : — The only reason that Mr. Gill)ert desired 
 to state anything with relation to the use of money to buy 
 the stock there at the farm, was because during a length}' 
 cross-examination of Mr. Lyndon Oak, at the last session, that 
 matter was extensively gone into, and for the purpose of 
 throwing discredit on the trustees of the College. Of course, 
 if that was not intended and it did not have that effect, we do 
 not care to go into it. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — I thought the cross-examination of Mr. Oak 
 was quite lengthy, and if I could have seen a point to cut it 
 off, I would have ; but brother Cornisii had connected it so 
 ingeniously that I could not. 
 
 Mr. Coi'nish : — I did not go into the matter of the farm 
 committee's management. I simply inquii-ed as to the pur- 
 chase of this fine-bred stock. Incidentally the farm committee 
 came in, but the management I did not care to touch upon. 
 We do not care anything about it, as it has nothing to do 
 with the case. It simi)ly came up incidentally. 
 
90 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Now can yoii state all the facts in connection 
 with this matter? 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — In the matter of the farm, you are aware, 
 the State was aware, that there was no fund appropriated in 
 recent years to work the* farm well. The stock was in very 
 indifl'erent condition when I went there, and was a disgrace 
 to the institution. And we wanted some better stock to 
 carry on better work. Not a dollar has been appropriated 
 l)y the State for that purpose, during my service as trustee ; 
 and in order to carry on the farm we had to have some stock. 
 To get the stock we either had to buy the stock on credit, or 
 borrow the money to buy it with. It was decided that a 
 portion of the money should be borrowed. 
 
 Mr. Libhy : — Let me break in here for the benefit of the 
 trustees of the College and the argument that you are mak- 
 ing now. I do not presume that this committee's report will 
 impeach anything in regard to the trustees' management of 
 State College. I suppose we shall answer generally just that 
 order (referring to the legislature under which the com- 
 mittee are acting). This other testimony is wholly unneces- 
 sary. Nobody disparages or places nwy stigma on the man- 
 agement of the College, whatever. Let us stick to that little 
 piece of paper and get through here and go home, like men. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — I have discussed freely up to the present time 
 all my transactions with that institution, all the facts I am in 
 possession of, and at all times I have fully explained to the 
 trustees all that I have done. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Do you wish to make any further state- 
 ment to this committee, in relation to the buying of those 
 cattle ? 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — As I understand it, this committee is inves- 
 tiffatinsf this matter of tuberculosis at the College. Now, 
 then, if it is understood that this matter is not to be referred 
 to in this investigation, that you do not call for any testimony 
 from me in regard to what I have been stating, and it is to 
 be ruled out absolutely — the College management, and the 
 farm matters — if you do not want it — 
 
91 
 
 Mi\ Walton : — Only so far as the tuberculosis is concerned. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — Do not you remember, Mr. Gilbert, the 
 first question I asked you the other night, prior to my examin- 
 ation, was whether you had any statement which you wished to 
 make this committee ; and you answered that you had none ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir ; I had a statement at the opening this evening, 
 but if the committee do not wish to have it, I am perfectly 
 willing that it shall go on without it. 
 
 Mr. CornisJi : — Since the other night you have found one? 
 
 Mr. SoutJtard : — Now that is not right. Certainly Mr. 
 Gilbert is entitled to make any explanation that he chooses 
 to that bears upon the cross-examination the other night. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — I have none to make. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — You may proceed and make any explanation 
 in connection with the cross-examination of the other niirht. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — I never asked a single question about the 
 farm management or the buying of these cattle on credit. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Well, let him go on. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — Mr. Gowell was authorized to secure money 
 to carry on that work. Some of it he borrowed b^'^ and with 
 the consent of the farm committee and the understandino^ of 
 himself. That is all to be found in his cash book. It was 
 put into a fund to work the ftirm. That was represented on 
 the books, and it was drawn upon as needed — sometimes it 
 was to pay for an animal, sometimes to pay for grain, feed, 
 etc. That was the account with him. Money was not hired 
 by note, but the account was settled and recognized by the 
 full Board of Trustees. And Mr. Gowell was required an- 
 nually to make a report officially of his department to the 
 Board of Trustees, and it was annually done, read at the 
 meeting of the Board of Trustees annually, accepted by them 
 annually, and it was published auinially — published in the 
 College report. I have nothing further to say in that con- 
 nection. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Do you mean to say you authorized him to 
 borrow what money he saw lit on the credit of the trustees 
 of the College, to invest in cattle? 
 
92 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — Not at all. We authorized him, from time 
 to time, to borrow sums of money needed to carry out our 
 directions ; not what he was a mind to borrow. 
 
 By Mr. Rich : 
 
 Q. That, you say, was used for various purposes? 
 
 A. Sometimes used to pay a meal bill, sometimes used to 
 pay for a cow ; and then the products, the income from butter 
 made from this cow, the milk sold, and other products sold, 
 accumulated money, and then it was from time to time paid 
 back, or portions of it. 
 
 Q. Simply a running account? 
 
 A. A runniug account, that is all. 
 
 By Mr. Southard: 
 
 Q. A great deal was attempted to be made out of the letter 
 which 3'ou wrote to Mr. Kent, and which you said was un- 
 official. Now, I would like to know, Mr. Gilbert, if you 
 have been applied to in a private capacity by people who 
 have on their places diseases among their animals? — 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — When do you mean ? 
 
 Mr. Southard : — At any time recently, or during the time 
 you have been secretary of the Board of Agriculture? 
 
 A. I have from time to time, all along, been called upon 
 and consulted in regard to cattle diseases. My intimacy with 
 people throughout the State led me into a knowledge of the 
 cattle business, and the leading herds of the State, while I 
 owned a large herd of cattle myself, and I have from time to 
 time been consulted in regard to cattle diseases, very fre- 
 quently. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — In your official capacity, or privately? 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — All privately. Of course, I have been con- 
 sulted officially, and of that, since I was one of the Cattle 
 Commissioners, I made an official report. 
 
 3Ir. Walton : — Let me suggest, Mr. Gilbert, that you 
 notice the question and answer it. We cannot have so much 
 put to every question that is asked here, and I say to you, 
 and to all the witnesses, that you have somebody to represent 
 
93 
 
 you hiivv. Now, when the attonicy asks you a question, you 
 answer him and stop. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert :— All right. 
 
 J3t/ Mr. Southard : 
 
 Q. How lately have you been c(nisultecl, Mr. Gill»ert, in 
 reference to the cattle diseases, in i)rivate capacity? 
 
 A. I have been consulted since the last hearin<^ in this 
 House. 
 
 Q. Do you know of any other of the Cattle Commission- 
 ers who have been consulted privately in relation to cattle 
 diseases? 
 
 A. I do ; my associate, Mr. Bailey, has been consulted 
 privately. 
 
 Q. It is a common thing, is it not, for men to come to you 
 as private citizens, and not as cattle commissioners, and ask 
 you what to do in relation to diseases that appear among their 
 herds ? 
 
 A. It has been within the last two or three years a very 
 common thing ; scarcely a week has passed but I have been 
 consulted in those connections. 
 
 Q. With relation to that letter to Dr. Bailey, dated March 
 10, 1886, in which you spoke of his visit to Bucksport a])out 
 the K(Mit bull, — 1 want to know if you said anything, after 
 that letter, to Dr. Bailey about this? 
 
 A. I don't know that I can recollect what letter you have 
 reference to. 
 
 Q. I mean this letter of March 10, 1886, that has been i)ut 
 in this case and has been talked about so much. Now, I 
 would like to know if you had any conversation with Dr. 
 Bailey, after that, in which the Kent bull and his visit to 
 Bucksport were referred to, and what you said in relation 
 to it ? 
 
 A. I did; 1 had a conversation with him following that. 
 
 Q. How long after was it? 
 
 A. I could not state. It was at our first meeting — soon 
 after. The question came up there — what was referred to 
 by me there was that I did not think the case warranted a 
 
94 
 
 visit from him. I staled to liiiu that uudcr the call which he 
 received he was called upon and should have res{)ondcd as he 
 did to that call, as it came from the municipal officers proi)erly 
 representing that there was disease there calling for his atten- 
 tion. 
 
 Q. Did you intend, in writing that letter, to make any 
 criticism upon his action in responding to the notitication of 
 Mr. McAlister, one of the selectmen of Bucksport? 
 
 A. Not at all. Why I used that word was simply the fact 
 that the bull had been represented to mo as sound. I under- 
 stood him to be sound. Therefore there was no reason for a 
 call. That was my point. 
 
 Q. Now, what did Dr. Bailey's report say — (or has th;it 
 been put in here) ? 
 
 A. That was put in last evening. He reported the bull 
 sound. 
 
 Q. And the previous knowledge that you had of the con- 
 dition of the bull was what? 
 
 A. The bull had been reported to me as sound. 
 
 Q. By whom ? 
 
 A. By the owner. 
 
 Q. In regard to Dr. Bailey's lirst visit to the Orono herd — 
 will you detail precisely what was done at that time? 
 
 A. I think his visit was March 6th, if I remember correctly. 
 
 Q. I would like to know what he did after arriving there? 
 
 A. Well, of course, as soon as we could do so, we visited 
 the barn together, and with Mr. Gowell and Professor Jor- 
 dan, President Fernald and Professor Balentine, looked the 
 cattle over deliberately and carefully. Dr. Bailey's tirst 
 statement to me was, he says : "Well, Gilbert, I don't see any 
 trouble here ; this herd looks to me all right." 
 
 Q. What had he done previously to base these remarks on ? 
 
 A. After a time, after looking the herd over and standing 
 and examining them and watching their breathing, etc., he 
 finally made some examination by sounding the lungs of two 
 or three animals — I could not tell you just how many, but 
 several animals. Finally he came to one animal and his sus- 
 
95 
 
 picioiis were aroiLsed lh;il the aniiiiiil was not (jiiite riijlit. He 
 tried lier temperature and found it a little elevated ; and 
 there were some suspicions expressed on her part th.it therc^ 
 was trouble with her water. He tried to draw her water, to 
 show that it was not right, light-colored, \3te., as he claimed 
 the water would show, in consequence of the fever and high 
 temperature, and he failed to draw her water. Very deliber- 
 ately we looked the herd over, well over, and \n) oH'ered ex- 
 })ressions similar to the tirst. 
 
 Q. Did you hear them ? 
 
 A. I did. 
 
 Q. State what they were? 
 
 A. He stated further, "Why, Gilbert, I don't thiidv it can 
 be ; I don't see any serious matter here ; it camiot be that 
 there is any difficulty with this herd." And so we looked 
 over still farther and watched. And the question was raised — 
 he was inquiring in regard to the cough, if there was any 
 cough on the part of any of the animals. I think Mr. Gowcll 
 stated that there had been some, but he failed to discover it at 
 that time. There was none apparent at that time. Finally, 
 at tile suggestion of — I am not able to say whether it was 
 Mr. Gowell or Professor Jordan — it was decided that we 
 should go out into the field and examine the cow that had 
 been previously killed. 
 
 Q. What cow was that? Do you remember? 
 
 A. I never have tried to remember their names. 
 
 Q. NN'as it the tirst one that died ? 
 
 A. It was the one that died a couple of weeks previous. I 
 have Hot tried to rememl)er the names of those animals. 
 
 (^. Y.iu went out to the field to see that cow? 
 
 A. Ir did not; the others went. Professor Jordan, Mr. 
 Gowell and Dr. Bailey. They went out and examined the 
 cow Dill there — I did not go Avith them — and brought back 
 one seetitiu of the lung, one lobe of the lung. We all hands 
 examined it then and there. 
 
 Q. Then what did Dr. Bailey pronounce the disease to be? 
 
96 
 
 A. After that he went and made further examination of 
 the animals, and finally diagnosed the disease as plain cases 
 of tuberculosis, and found several animals affected with it, 
 by percussion and auscultation. 
 
 Q. Was he the only veterinary surgeon there ? 
 
 A. He was. 
 
 Q. Was tuberculosis suggested before these gentlemen 
 went out and examined the dead body of that cow? 
 
 A. I could not say whether it was or not? 
 
 Q. Do not know whether it was talked over or not ? 
 
 A. No ; I would not say. 
 
 Q. Did you have any idea that this was tuberculosis at that 
 time? 
 
 A. No, I had not ; I had not had any experience with tu- 
 berculosis. Of course, I was read up on it, as all our cattle 
 treatises treat of it ; but I had no knowledge of specific cases 
 of tuberculosis, up to that time. 
 
 Q. None of these cases, up to that time, had been pro- 
 nounced tuberculosis by any veterinary surgeon? 
 
 A. No; or by anyl)ody else that I ever heard. 
 
 Q. Well, do you remember how those cattle looked when 
 they came to the barn that fall, previous to their being killed 
 in the spring? Did you see them the preceding summer? 
 
 .V. I did, occasionally. I saw them at the time of the 
 fair at Bangor, and I saw them at the time of the annual 
 meeting of the Board of Trustees, the last week in November. 
 
 Q. What was the condition of the animals you took to 
 Bangor to the fair? 
 
 A. They were in very fine condition, so much so that they 
 attracted a good deal of attention. 
 
 Q. Any appearance of disease among them? 
 
 A. Not at all. 
 
 Q. Any cough noticed? 
 
 A. Not at all. 
 
 Q. How was it with the animals that you left back? 
 
 A. The same might be said of those, so far as their condi- 
 tion was concerned. Of course, we took the choicest animals 
 
97 
 
 to the Fair ; but the ones we left back there were eqiually 
 well, or looked as well. 
 
 Q. Now, what is the rule followed by veterinary surgeons, 
 whenever they find the disease called tuberculosis in a herd? 
 
 Mr. Cornish: — Mr. Chairman, and gentlemen, I have not 
 raised an objection during the whole process of this investi- 
 gation ; but this man announced himself not to be a veteri- 
 narj'^ surgeon, and I submit this is not a proper question to 
 put to him. 
 
 Mr. Southard: — Mr. Gilbert has acted, of course, under 
 the advice of veterinary surgeons ; he knows perfectly well 
 what their rule is, and I think it perfectly competent for hira' 
 to state the advice under which he has acted. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Was not there a veterinary surgeon on the 
 Cattle Commission? 
 
 Mr. Cornish: — Yes, sir; Dr. Bailey. 
 
 Mr. Walt07i : — Was he not put on it for the purpose of 
 acting in that capacity ? 
 
 Mr. Southard : — I presume he was ; but if a veterinar}':^ 
 surgeon was to have all to do with it there was no need of a 
 Commission. 
 
 3fr. Walton: — But do you claim that Mr. Gilbert went out 
 and got the advice of other veterinary surgeons, besides Dr. 
 Bailey ? 
 
 Mr. Southard: — I propose to show that Mr. Gilbert has 
 had the advice of veterinary surgeons, and knows what their 
 rule is in such a matter. 
 
 Mr. Walton: — Well, Dr. Bailey is to be a witness here. 
 Wait until he gets through, and perhaps he will state it him- 
 self. If not, you can put in this class of testimony afterwards. 
 
 Mr. Southard: — 1 think, then, at this stage of the case, 
 that is all we will ask Mr. Gilbert. 
 
 J5y 3Ir. Cornish : 
 
 Q. Mr. Gilbert, do you wish to communicate to this com- 
 mittee the idea that Dr. Bailey did not appreciate the disease 
 at the State College? 
 
98 
 
 A. In answer to that I will say that I wish to communicate 
 to this committee all the facts in my possession that they 
 want to hear. 
 
 Mr. Cornish: — Now, Mr. Chairman, I submit that this is 
 going too far; we are going into another cross-examination, 
 such as we had here the last session, page after page. I ask 
 a simple question and it can be answered in a simple manner. 
 I submit that you request him to answer my question. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Suppose I request him, and he will not do 
 it? 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — Then hold him in contempt of the com- 
 mittee. 
 
 3Ir. Walton : — Have you any objection to answering the 
 question by Yes or No, that Mr. Cornish has asked ? 
 
 Mr. Southard : — His answer to one of my questions fully 
 answered that question, Mr. Cornish. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — I would like him to repeat that question 
 once more, and I will answer you (referring to the com- 
 mittee). 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — I wish to know, Mr. Gilbert, if you ignore 
 me when I ask you a question ? 
 
 Mr. Walton : — That is not the question you asked before, 
 brother Cornish. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — No ; but it is one called out by his manner. 
 The first question was this : 
 
 Q. Do you wish to communicate to this committee, Mr. 
 Gilbert, the idea that Dr. Bailey, the veterinary surgeon, 
 did not appreciate this disease when he called at the State 
 College ? 
 
 A. No. 
 
 Q. Do you wish to say that he was at all remiss in his 
 duty? 
 
 A. I have not said so. 
 
 Q. Do you intend to say so? 
 
 A. I intended to answer the questions just as they were 
 put to me, and state the facts. 
 
99 
 
 Q. Do 3'oii mean now for the committee to infer that Dr. 
 Bailey was at all remiss in his duty? 
 
 A. Mr. Chairman, have I not answered that question? 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Practically, I think you have, Mr. Gilbert. 
 I do not think you are required to draw any conclusion from 
 your own statements. You leave that for the committee. I 
 guess, brother Cornish, he has got you there. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — I don't think he has. I think you have 
 got me because you are in the chair, but I don't think Mr. 
 Gilbert has got me. I submit to the higher authority. 
 
 Q. How long after Dr. Bailey stepped into the barn, that 
 day when you were with him, was it before he pronounced 
 tuberculosis to exist in that herd? 
 
 A. I could not state the exact time. 
 
 Q. About how long? 
 
 A. I can approximate it. I should say it was about one- 
 half an hour before they went to the field. 
 
 Q. How long after they went into the barn was it, approxi- 
 mately ? 
 
 A. They went into the field and made the examination, 
 and returned aud then commenced a re-examination of the 
 animals. 
 
 Q. Do you mean to say that before they went into the 
 field he did not discover that tuberculosis existed there, so 
 far as your observation went? 
 
 A. He did not state that he discovered it. 
 
 Q. Did he make any examination of the cattle before he 
 went into the field? 
 
 A. He did. 
 
 Q. With any instruments? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Did he try percussion? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. And still did not discover tuberculosis there? 
 
 A. Well, I have answered that question once. 
 
 Q. And you still stick to that statement? 
 
100 
 
 A. I state the same as I did before. 
 
 Q. How long was he in the barn before they went out into 
 the field? 
 
 A. About one-half an hour, as near as I can judge. 
 
 Q. How many cattle did he examine before he went into 
 the field? 
 
 A. I do not know ; several — say two or three. 
 
 Q. Do you know which one he examined first? 
 
 A. I could not state. I do not know the animals by name. 
 
 Q. Was it one of the cows ? 
 
 A. I know which one he tried to draw water from, and 
 where she stood. 
 
 Q. Was it one of the cows he examined first? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Do you know which lung of the animal he examined 
 first? 
 
 A. No, I could not state. I don't remember. 
 
 Q. Was Professor Balentine present there ? 
 
 A. I think he was. 
 
 Q. One question more, Mr. Gilbert, I meant to ask you 
 the other night. But before we come to that — is what you 
 have stated here to-night the only explanation you wish to 
 make regarding your correspondence in relation to the Kent 
 bull? 
 
 A. No ; I have some more correspondence in my pocket. 
 
 Q. Is that the only statement you wish to make regarding 
 that correspondence ? 
 
 A. I do not recall anything now. 
 
 Q. You stated the other night, in regard to the Kent bull, 
 that at the hearing before the Agricultural Committee, Jan- 
 uary 19th, you did not know the Kent bull had been de- 
 stroyed, did you not? 
 
 A. Yes, sir ; and I so stated here the other night at your 
 request. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Have you the letter Mr. Kent wrote ? 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — I put it in testimony the other night. 
 
101 
 
 Mr. Southard : — It was a private letter and destroj^ed with 
 his private correspondence. 
 
 Mr. Cornish'. — Yes; alleged private correspondence. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — That is unfair. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — You stated the other night, did you not, 
 that you did not know that the Kent bull had been destroyed? 
 
 A. I so stated to the committee, at that time. 
 
 Q. Had 3'ou not, on the 15th day of November, 1886, 
 received a letter from Dr. Bailey, in which he spoke of the 
 Kent bull having been killed? 
 
 A. No, sir ; never received a letter from him, up to this 
 time, in which he spoke of the Kent bull being killed. 
 
 Q. Did you not two days prior to that hearing before the 
 Agricultural Committee, namely, the 17th of January, have a 
 conversation with Mr. Bell, in which you spoke of the Kent 
 bull being killed? 
 
 A. I don't recollect any. 
 
 Q. Do you say that you did not have it ? 
 
 A. I say I don't recall any. 
 
 Q. Do you recollect testifying before the Agricultural 
 Committee, on the 2d of FebiMuiry, in regard to tul)erculosis, 
 and stating that Dr. Bailey did not disagree with you pro- 
 fessionally, and you did not disagree with him professionally? 
 
 A. I stated that I did not disagree with him professionally ; 
 I did not make the other statement, that I recollect. 
 
 Q. Did you not also state that you depended on him, and 
 left all matters of that kind (tuberculosis) to him, because 
 you did not pretend to know anything about tuberculosis? 
 
 A. All matters of diagnoses of disease, at all times, every- 
 where, were left with Dr. Bailey ; and his opinions were con- 
 sidered at all times by the Commissioners. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Then 3'ou did not get advice from other 
 veterinary surgeons, without he recommended it? 
 
 Mr. Gilbert: — Certainly, we did. 
 
 Mr. Walton. : — What did you do that for, if you left all 
 that part of the business to him? 
 
102 
 
 M7\ Gilbert : — He corresponded with them by arrange- 
 ment with us, after talking it over with the President of the 
 College, and the Governor and members of his Council — 
 corresponded with veterinarians, the leading veterinarians of 
 the country, including Dr. Salmon and Dr. Liautard. 
 
 Mr. Walton : — That was left for him to do, was it not? 
 
 A. That was left for him to do for the Commission, he 
 being secretary of the Commission. And he did so. We 
 got replies from them — advice. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — Do you remember, after that statement 
 which you made to the Agricultural Committee, February 
 2d, of having another conversation with Dr. Bailey and Mr. 
 Bell, in another room near by, in relation to tuberculosis and 
 what you knew about it in the State? 
 
 Mr. Southard : — I believe this is tuberculosis at the State 
 College farm we are investigating. Still, it is not our pur- 
 pose to object to anything proper they are of a mind to ask. 
 We want to make a full breast of everything that ought to 
 be known. 
 
 31r. Waltoii : — Please repeat your question, brother Cor- 
 nish. 
 
 Mr. Corniah : — I don't remember the exact phrasing of it. 
 The stenographer can repeat it. 
 
 (Question read by the stenographer.) 
 
 Mr. Walton : — It is pretty remote. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — Well, I do not insist on it. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — Mr. Gilbert, you are secretary of the 
 Board of Agriculture? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. And as such, of course, an ex-officio trustee of the 
 College ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. And ex-officio a member of the Board of Cattle Com- 
 missioners ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. When were you put on the farm committee of the 
 State College ? 
 
103 
 
 A. Sometime during my first term — 
 
 Mr. Southard : — I believe this is irrelevant under the rul- 
 ing of the chair. 
 
 Mr. Walton: — Well, you might go on, Mr. Cornish. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — Thank you. 
 
 A. Soon after I was elected secretary of the B(Kird of 
 Agriculture. 
 
 Q. In what year? 
 
 A. I was elected secretary of the Board of Agriculture on 
 the 7th day of April, 1880. 
 
 Mr. Libhy : — Do you think all of those cattle were sick 
 that you killed there? 
 
 A. No ; I do not. I never have thought so. 
 
 Q. What proportion of them do you think were sick with 
 the consumption? 
 
 A, Well, there wjis from half to three-foui'ths — say three- 
 fourths of them. I would not state very definitely, because 
 I did not count up — say three-fourths. 
 
 Q. Did you see the most of them killed? 
 
 A. I saw what was killed the first day. 
 
 Q. How uiany? 
 
 A. Twenty-two, I think. 
 
 Q. You saw them opened? 
 
 A. All of those I examined. 
 
 Q. Could you detect disease in nearly all of those 3'ou 
 saw killed? 
 
 A. Any one who had ever seen the internal organs of any 
 animal could detect disease in any one of those. We took 
 the worst first. 
 
 Q. You did not see the well ones killed? 
 
 A. No, I did not. 
 
 Mr. Rich : — Were there any well ones killed? 
 
 Mr. Walton : — Ask him his opinion of their condition. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — Do you mean, Mr. Gilbert, that there 
 were well animals at the time of the killinsf? 
 
104 
 
 A. At the time of the killing there were — veterinarians 
 can pronounce on that better than I can, although I will 
 make the statement if you wish me to. 
 
 Mr. Libby : — We ask your opinion as a farmer. 
 
 A. All right. The veterinarians pronounced indications 
 of disease, as I understood the case — in fact nearly all of the 
 animals had been examined before I left, that is, the principal 
 part of the herd. There were four, as I remember it, good 
 animals, that did not have indications of disease, that they 
 did not find indications of disease in. 
 
 Mr. Cornish: — That was on the 22d day of April? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. And when was it you say only a half to three-fourths 
 of them were diseased ; how long prior to that time? 
 
 A. At that examination. I gave my opinion, not as an ex- 
 pert, but as a farmer. There were one-half to three-quarters 
 of them diseased. 
 
 Q. But it proved, on examination, that all but four of them 
 were diseased? 
 
 A. That is what they stated. 
 
 Mr. Libby : — Did you notice all these cattle coughed when 
 you were there? 
 
 A. No, I did not. 
 
 Q. Were you around the barn considerable, so as to hear? 
 
 A. I was ; I watched that herd pretty closely. 
 
 Q. You do not have an idea that half of them had a cough? 
 
 A. Yes, I think I heard more than one-half of them cough ; 
 but there was quite a considerable number of them I had not 
 heard cough. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — Do you doubt that all but four were 
 afflicted with disease? 
 
 A. Mr. Counsel, shall I state what I doubt? 
 
 Mr. Southard : — I don't think you are called upon to state 
 what you doubt. 
 
 Mr. Cornish ; — Now, Mr. Chairman, I submit that I have 
 seen a great many witnesses n\ court ; but I never saw one 
 that had to be protected so much as this one. 
 
 [ 
 
105 
 
 Mr. Walton : — I have just been talking to my friends on 
 the committee about the danger of setting this thing going 
 again. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — Better stop the pendulum. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — I simply want to know this : He gets up 
 here and says, as a farmer, he thinks three-fourths of those 
 cattle that were killed were diseased. I ask him whether he 
 doubts that all but four of those animals were diseased, more 
 or less ? 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — I doubt about their being seriously diseased. 
 
 Q. Do you doubt they were more or less diseased ? 
 
 A. There was not in those animals any other external ap- 
 pearances of disease than I spoke of. 
 
 Q. Now will you answer my question ? Do you doubt that 
 all but four of those animals were more or less diseased, 
 when killed ? 
 
 A. I don't think I can answer that question. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — That is all I want to know. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF SAMUEL BELL. 
 
 I reside in Deering. Have no business at present. Have 
 been in the retail shoe business some 39 years. I have carried 
 on a farm some 25 years and had a stock of cattle during that 
 time. I have partially served on the Cattle Commission of 
 the State of Maine. I mean by that that I have not served 
 fully with the other Commissioners ; only served a part of the 
 time. I was appointed one of the Commissioners by the Gov- 
 ernor. I did not serve all the time because I was not notified 
 to, was not informed that my labors were needed on the Com- 
 mission. I commenced to act in 1884, soon after the break- 
 ing out of the foot and mouth disease. My commission has 
 not yet expired. The only information I have in relation to 
 the herd of cattle at Orono that was slaughtered is what I 
 saw in the public prints, until the slaughter. I was not at 
 all notified to act and did not go to the College nor see the 
 cattle. About the 18th of last October I received a notice 
 
106 
 
 from Mr. Gilbert that the Commission was to have a meeting 
 on Oct. 20th, in the evening, at Portland. I have it here 
 and it is as follows : 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Ao^ricnltiire, \ 
 
 Nortli Greene, October 15th, 1886. J 
 
 Mr. Bell : — You are requested to meet the Board of Cattle Commission- 
 ers at Cit}^ Hotel, Portland, Wednesday evening, October 20th, at seven 
 o'clock. 
 
 Yours, 
 (Signed) Z. A. Gilbert, 
 
 Pres't. 
 
 I went there at the time appointed and found Messrs. Gilbert 
 and Ferguson there, the commission of the latter having run 
 out at that time. After being there a few minutes Mr. Gilbert 
 said to me and Mr. Ferguson that he would like to have us 
 go up into his room a few minutes. We went up, and when 
 we were fairly seated in the room he said he wanted to pre- 
 pare our minds for what was coming before us. It was the 
 first intimation that I had but that the meeting was to be 
 there. It seemed by his remark that it was not, but was to 
 be somewhere else. He commenced by saying, in substance, 
 that we were to meet at Dr. Bailey's and he wanted to pre- 
 pare our minds before we went there for what we should 
 probably hear when we got there, from Dr. Bailey, with 
 reference to the bulls that had gone out from the College 
 farm. He said Dr. Bailey was somewhat crazy on the sub- 
 ject, to have those bulls slaughtered ; and he commenced by 
 saying the bulls were well so far as he knew ; that there was 
 no reason why they should be slaughtered ; there was no 
 evidence that the dams were diseased when the calves were 
 dropped, and,^in fact, if they were, we had nothing to do 
 with that ; that there was no law that would give us authority 
 to have anything to do with them, and he thought the best 
 way was to let them alone. He talked until he expressed his 
 mind fully bearing upon this point. Perhaps we were there 
 half an hour. We then went to Dr. Bailey's house. Of 
 
107 
 
 course I had heard nothing before about the matter. It was 
 news to me. After a few preliminary remarks at Dr. Bailey's, 
 with reference to our meeting, the matter at once came up. 
 Dr. Bailey asked Mr. Gilbert what was going to be done with 
 the bulls that had gone out from the College herd. Mr. 
 Gilbert said. Nothing ; he did not know anything that could 
 be done with them ; that there was no evidence that the bulls 
 were diseased. After talkins: a time in jjeneral termo with 
 reference to tliem all, Dr. Bailey spoke of the Kent bull. He 
 had been to see him. Mr. Gilbert told him that he had since 
 understood that the Kent bull was sound and had been sound, 
 and he didn't see as we had anything to do with him at all. 
 Dr. Bailey made some further statements with reference to 
 hearing from either Mr. Kent or Mr. McAlister, one of the 
 selectmen of Bucksport — I think it was Mr. Kent — and after 
 considerable talk between the two, it was finally brought down 
 to the point, by Dr. Bailey, as to what was going to be done 
 eventually with reference to the report, as the time was draw- 
 ing near when the report was to be made. Dr. Bailey said : "If 
 you will take the ground you do, why, I cannot agree with 
 you, for I certainly never could sign a report without advis- 
 ing that those bulls should be examined, and if found dis- 
 eased they should be put out of the way." Mr. Gilbert said 
 there was no occasion for that at all that he could see ; that 
 we had nothing to do with them ; that the State did not call 
 upon us to tell them what we had not done, but simply what 
 we had done, and he saw no reason why we should refer to 
 them at all. Dr. Bailey told him his conscience never would 
 be clear to make a report without making reference to them. 
 He thought it was absolutely necessary. Ho thought the 
 disease could be scattered all through the country if they 
 were allowed to be used for stock purposes while they came 
 from such diseased parents as many of them did. He finally 
 made a proposition to Mr. Gilbert. He said : "I will make 
 a report and m:ike these recommendations, which we can all 
 sign, perhaps, or you may have my minutes and make a re- 
 port to suit yourselves, and if Mr. Bell or Mr. Ferguson are 
 
108 
 
 disposed to sign it, all right." So the matter, so far as the 
 bulls were concerned, closed. There was a great deal more 
 said there than I have repeated, but it amounts to this, as I 
 understand it. It closed up with the proposition of Dr. 
 Bailey, which Mr. Gilbert neither accepted nor rejected, as I 
 know of — that is, he did not propose to make any such re- 
 port as Dr. Bailey desired, and he did not say he would make 
 such a report as Dr. Bailey recommended him to make by 
 taking his minutes. 
 
 I have had since that time at least two or three talks with Mr. 
 Gilbert, and perhaps three or four. I went with him to South 
 Waterboro,' I think the next day after the meeting, to settle 
 some matters there connected with a herd, and one or two of 
 them were destroyed atterwards. I was not present at the de- 
 struction though, didn't know anything about it. I had a 
 notice from Mr. Gilbert to go up there, but got it too late. 
 But I did go up to settle the business with him, and at that 
 time, in going and coming, we talked more or less with refer- 
 ence to these bulls that were out and other matters pertain- 
 ing to disagreements between him and Dr. Bailey, and each 
 and ever}^ time I talked with him he took one and the same 
 ground — that he was totally opposed to anything being done 
 with reference to the bulls that were out, unless it was under 
 different circumstances than had thus far come before us. I 
 signed the report made by Dr. Bailey. There is, perhaps, one 
 point that I have omitted with reference to that meeting. 
 When I started from the hotel with Mr. Gilbert and Mr. 
 Ferguson I thought that Mr. Gilbert was probably right in 
 his view of the matter; yet I questioned the propriety, for 
 the paltry sum that the bulls were worth, whether or not it 
 would be prudent to leave them scattered round through the 
 country as they were. But I did not decide one way or the 
 other at the hotel. After we got to Dr. Bailey's and I heard 
 the evidence that he produced from his professional stand- 
 point, that the bulls were diseased, I made up my mind then 
 and there that it was not safe to let them remain as they were. 
 After the conversation between Mr. Gilbert and Dr. Bailey, 
 
109 
 
 and the argument between them was wound up by each say- 
 ing all they wanted to in the matter, they referred the case 
 to Mr. Ferguson and myself, to know what our opinions were. 
 I decided with Dr. Bailey that I thought it was right that the 
 bulls should be slaughtered and put out of the way, because 
 it seemed to me from the evidence of Dr. Bailey, given from 
 his professional standpoint, that they must be diseased, from 
 the parentage from which they came. I never saw these 
 cattle that were at the College farm and had no personal 
 knowledge of them whatever. I do not know that I ever saw 
 any cattle sick with this disease. When I signed this report 
 of Dr. Bailey's I signed it measurably on his knowledge,, but 
 I cannot say wholly so, because I have read the disease up 
 and have talked with some other veterinarians, but not to 
 any great extent. Some little time after going to South 
 Waterboro' with Mr. Gilbert I received a letter from Mr. 
 Gilbert inclosing a letter that was sent to him by Dr. Bailey, 
 and from him sent to me for me to read in connection with 
 some remarks in his letter to me. In that he referred to the 
 bulls, with reference to Dr. Bailey's feelings to him ; and 
 there were some remarks in the letter with reference to what 
 his views were. The letter is here. (The letter was read 
 by the chairman and is as follows) : 
 
 North Greene, Oct. 25, 1886. 
 Bro. Bell : — T inclose letter within from Dr. B. which, after reading his 
 "proposition,*' yon will please return to me. I have to request that you 
 see the Dr. and talk the matter over with him as you think. You need 
 not let him know I have written yon. or that yon have seen his letter. 
 You may say to him I go to Wasliington county Wednesday, to return 
 on Saturday. I think there has been about fooling enough over the 
 Bucksport matter and I want it dried up. I never can consent to have 
 anything to do with the matter further than as advisory to Mr. Kent. 
 
 Yours truly, 
 
 (Signed) Gilbert. 
 
 Mr. Bell : — After receiving that letter I went to see Dr. 
 Bailey, and the first question he asked me was whether I had 
 heard from Mr. Gilbert, saying that he had written him a 
 letter and had received uo answer. I explained it to him by 
 
110 
 
 saying he had gone away. He said, "Have you received a 
 letter from him?" I evaded tlie question at the time, fori 
 did not feel as though I ought to inform him, but was finally 
 obliged to do so or tell an absolute lie, and I told him I had 
 received a letter from Mr. Gilbert, and told him what the 
 letter contained. I immediately wrote to Mr. Gilbert saying 
 I had seen Dr. Bailey and Dr. Bailey had cornered me so I 
 had to explain that I had heard from him (Mr. Gilbert). 
 Some little time after that I received a letter from Mr. Gilbert 
 saying that he wanted me to assist in making up the report, 
 and in substance that the Legislature was anxious to have a 
 report from the Commission, and he had written Dr. Bailey 
 and wanted me to meet him at Woodford's Corner and go into 
 the city with him, and then, with Dr. Bailey, to go to Augusta 
 and make out the report of the doings of the Commission. I 
 met Mr. Gilbert at the depot at the appointed time, and he 
 got off the train. I said : "You are not going into the city?" 
 He said No, as it was no use ; he had heard from Dr. Bailey 
 and he did not propose to make any report with him, refused 
 to make any report. We went into the depot and had some 
 little talk before the train arrived, and then he got on and 
 came back. In the conversation he asked me if I would go 
 down to Augusta with him. I told him that I did not feel 
 willing to sign such a report as he proposed to make ; that I 
 believed Dr. Bailey's suggestion was a proper one, and I 
 could not conscientiously sign a report without referring to 
 these bulls that had gone out from the College herd ; I thought 
 they ought to be put out of the way and it seemed to be the 
 duty of the Commissioners to at least recommend it. He .^aid 
 we had nothing to do with it; that it was none of our busi- 
 ness; that no evidence of their being diseased was before us, 
 and he used the same language or similar language to that 
 which he used at our meeting with Dr. Bailey. I said : "Well, 
 there is one thing about it, I never have signed any report 
 that has been made. You have never requested me to do it, 
 and I do not feel as if I could go this one if I would." He 
 told me he did not know what he should do, as nobody but 
 
Ill 
 
 himself felt so about it. As he and I were the only other ones 
 on the Commission he thought it was my duty to go with him 
 and sign the report. I told him I could not do it conscien- 
 tiously. He said : "There is one thing about it : if you do 
 not do it I think the Commission will be broken up, and my 
 opinion is that they will put the State Board of Health on the 
 Commission." I said, "Very well, I shall accept the situa- 
 tion whatever it may be. I don't propose to do it." He urged 
 me very strongly, and finally he said he wanted me to come 
 down Thursday morning and sign it if I would. If not he 
 vv^ould go down and make the report. I told him if I changed 
 my mind I would come, and unless I did, I gave him to 
 understand that I should not. In conversation with him then, 
 in speaking of Dr. Bailey and the bulls that had gone out 
 from the College herd, I said : "You know what was done 
 with the Kent bull, I suppose? You know Dr. Bailey paid 
 twenty dollars out of his own pocket and had that bull killed. 
 I understand, besides, that the lungs of the bull were sent to 
 him and that he found unmistakable evidences of disease, and 
 he was not satisfied with that, or in other words wanted more 
 evidence, and he sent a part of the lungs to New York and 
 has since had testimony from veterinarians there that examined 
 the lung that there were unmistakable traces of tuberculosis 
 in the bull." I don't remember whether Mr. Gilbert said he 
 was aware of the fact or not, but I told him as I under- 
 stood it from Dr. Bailey. When I told him of the Kent bull 
 I remember that he remarked something like this, that if Dr. 
 Bailey had minded his own business there would have been 
 no trouble with the Kent bull. He felt, as I understand him 
 to say, that Dr. Bailey had busied himself and had really 
 made trouble unnecessarily ; that if he had kept quiet there 
 would have been no troul)le about it. I have here the letter 
 which I received dated Jan. 13th. (The letter was read by 
 the chairman, and is as follows ;) 
 
 Skowhegan. Jan. 13, 1S87. 
 Br. Bell : — Meet me at station on down Lewiston train on Rtonday next, 
 and so into Portland station with me. The Legislature is in a stew over 
 
112 
 
 the fact that we have not made a report. It must be done at once. I have 
 written the doctor to this effect, and have asked him to be at the station 
 and go to Angnsta and fix it np. 
 
 Write by Saturday mail that I maj"^ know what to depend upon. 
 
 Yours, 
 
 (Signed) Gilbert. 
 
 Mr. Bell : — I met him at the station the following Monday, 
 the 17th, and had the conversation with him which I have 
 stated. I also received from him letter dated Feb. 8th, '87. 
 
 (This letter was read in evidence, and is as follows :) 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture, \ 
 
 North Greene, Feb. 8, 1887. j 
 
 Br. Bell:—! was surprised to find you mixed up with the mischief con- 
 nected with that cattle disease matter. I don't know how to account for 
 it on the estimate I have held of you, and after what you had said to me. 
 I am sadly shocked over it. 
 
 I hope to see you at the Farmers' Institute at City Hall next Tuesday. 
 
 I am now at liberty to reveal a secret bearing on yourself. 
 
 Hoping to meet you, I am. 
 
 Yours, 
 
 (Signed) Z. A. Gilbert. 
 
 Mr. Bell : — After this letter was written I met Mr. Gilbert 
 at Dr. Bailey's house, where I went to see Dr. Bailey, and 
 Mr. Gilbert was there. Mr. Gilbert came oui and got into my 
 sleigh and we went on a short ride, and whether he revealed 
 the secret to me I do not know ; but I accepted what he said 
 as an explanation of what he wrote, that is, the secret. He 
 did not say and I did not ask him if that was what his letter 
 meant. What he told me amounted to this, that so far as 
 my being ignored by the Cattle Commission, he was not to 
 blame ; that it was Dr. Bailey more than himself. Whether 
 he meant to give me to understand that that was the secret 
 referred to in his letter or not, I cannot say. But he tried to 
 relieve himself from any blame in the matter of my not be- 
 ing countenanced or recognized as one of the Commission, 
 which I had not been fully ; had not been consulted as other 
 Commissioners had been. And I felt it somewhat, of course ; 
 
lis 
 
 but then, not enough to Jay up any hardness at all. We 
 never had but one meeting of the board while I was on it. 
 I have no other letters from Mr. Gilbert except the one 
 for me to go to South Waterboro', which is not of import- 
 ance. Whenever I was called to serve on the Commission 
 1 was called by Mr. Gilbert. There was one case, a glan- 
 dered horse, where I was called upon by Dr. Bailey, I 
 think. It was a case in the city. I do not remember that 
 I ever received any letter from Dr. Bailey. I was on the 
 Commission with Dr. Bailey three years the thirty-tirst of 
 this month. I think Dr. Bailey did ignore me. I do not 
 dispute that Mr. Gilbert told me the truth. I signed this 
 minority report. I read the report and also heard Dr. Bailey 
 read it. I believed all the things stated in it and that is why 
 I signed it. I understand that report to give a full account 
 with reference to the disease at the College. It traces the 
 disease from mother to ofl'spring, &c., of the cattle in the 
 herd. Perhaps there is nothing in the report which shows 
 that these bulls that had gone out from that herd are diseased. 
 I think the Kent bull was diseased because I heard the letter 
 read from Dr. Michener with reference to the condition of 
 the lung, and I had the testimony of Dr. Bailey in regard to 
 it, and I believed it. I did not see the lung of the Kent bull. 
 I do not say that Mr. Gilbert stated at the City Hotel that if 
 the bull was diseased they would have nothing to do with him. 
 I said that he said that we had nothing to do with it. He 
 gave two reasons why, and one was that we had no law and 
 the other that there was no evidence that the bull was diseased. 
 He said Dr. Bailey had been and examined the bull and pro- 
 nounced him well. I think that at the time Dr. Bailey ex- 
 amined him he had no evidence but that he was well. I 
 thought the bull was not well for the reason I have given — 
 from what I have learned from veterinarians in reference to 
 the disease I thought it could not be possible it could be 
 sound, being dropped by a dam so full of disease as Princess 
 Alba ; so it could not be that the calf was free from the disease. 
 
114 
 
 I did not know whether Princess Alba was sick or well when 
 she dropped this calf. I did not know anything about the thir- 
 teen bulls sent out from there, except what I learned from Mr. 
 Gilbert. I never learned they were sick and have not up to this 
 time. I believe they are sick. I did not contend with Mr. 
 Gilbert at the meeting at the City Hotel or afterwards but 
 that he was right as to the law in regard to the Kent bull ; I 
 did not contend but that he was right. I did not make any 
 contention about the law at all. Mr. Gilbert said we had no 
 law ; Bailey said ho thought we had. If the i)ull was well I 
 should have no doubt that the Commissioners had no right to 
 interfere with him; but I do not think he was wea. I was 
 not satisfied about his being well. I did not know where any 
 of these bulls were except the Kent bull, and never had re- 
 ceived any information. Mr. Gilbert never said anything 
 about where they were or anything about it. I remember 
 perfectly in the conversation that evening that Dr. Bailey in- 
 directly asked where the bulls were, or in other words he 
 said: "If you will tell me where those bulls arc I can prove 
 to you or show to you that some at least of those bulls will 
 give evidence of disease." That was the idea that he pre- 
 sented. Mr. Gilbert replied that he had nothing to do with 
 that ; he did not, at any rate, tell him where they were. He 
 did not tell Bailey that he had information as to where the 
 bulls were at that time. He did not answer the question as 
 to where the bulls were. He did not pretend that he knew, 
 directly. I received no notice from Mr. Gilbert as to the 
 cattle disease at Orono ; never heard anything about it ex- 
 cept what I saw in the papers. Dr. Bailey who lived near 
 me said nothing to me about it. He was secretary of the 
 Commission. I understood that Gilbert wrote to Bailey to 
 go to Orono. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF GEORGE H. BAILEY. 
 
 By Mr. Walton : 
 
 Q. I believe you made a report in full of what you found 
 there in regard to the disease of those cattle didn't you ? 
 
115 
 
 A. Yes, sir; too full, some of them think, I believe. I 
 endeavored to make a full and fair report of that trouble at 
 Orono. 
 
 By Mr. Allen: 
 
 Q. I wish you would state to the committee what occurred 
 when you went into the stable at Orono in examining those 
 cattle before you went out into the field to examine the dead 
 creature? 
 
 A. I went out into the barn and met Prof. Balentine, 
 Prof. Fernald, Prof. Jordan and, I think, Mr. Gowell, and 
 some of the men were there looking over the cattle. I looked 
 them over casually. I do not think I ever saw a finer lot of 
 cattle than they were. They deceived me very much, I am 
 willing to admit now, right on the start, as to their true con- 
 dition. They looked well and appeared well, and looked full 
 and sleek, and in good order and flesh, and I listened some 
 time before I heard a single cough from an animal. Finally I 
 asked Mr. Gowell if the cattle did cough ; and he told me 
 that first and last he had heard all of them cough but one. I 
 kept listening, and one after another coughed. I took the 
 temperature of several, quite a number of them. 
 
 Q. How did you do that? 
 
 A. By a thermometer in the rectum, and I found the tem- 
 perature almost universally in those that I tried about 103. 
 That of itself is a suspicious symptom of pleuro-pneumonia, or 
 tuberculosis either. I examined the first cow as we entered 
 by auscultation and percussion. That was the Princess Alba. 
 She had a flatulent abdomen and her elbows stood out and 
 she had some little labored respiration. I examined her on 
 one side and found no alarming symptom, and said to Prof. 
 Fernald, "You will have to show me something besides this 
 to make me condemn her," and I think I had said before 
 that, "I think you are more scared than hurt here." I went 
 round the other side of Princess Alba and percussed her and 
 found marked dullness over the whole lung. I think I had 
 then been in the barn ten minutes. I turned round to Gilbert 
 and said, "Gilbert, you have got tuberculosis in this herd. 
 
116 
 
 You can depend upon that. There is no pleuro-pneumonia 
 here." This was u long time before I went out into the field. 
 I knew those cattle had tuberculosis before 1 went out of the 
 barn. These gentlemen must not think I was such a fool as 
 not to know that. I asked for the privileo-e of going out in 
 the field because I wanted to verify my diagnosis. So after a 
 while I did go out in the field to see that animal, and that 
 proved the correctness of my diagnosis. I afterwards gave 
 more of them careful examination and looked over the herd 
 very carefull}', and I came to a very solid conclusion. That 
 is the first visit I am speaking of. It was on March 6th. Not 
 only from seeing the cattle in the barn, but from that lung in 
 the field I knew they had the disease. I had no doubt about 
 it and told Gilbert so. They had a temperature of 103 and 
 over. I took the temperature of lots of them. My first im- 
 pression was that a part of them would have to be killed and 
 a part of them could be saved. Part of them looked so well 
 that I thought it was not possible for them all to develop the 
 disease. That was my first visit. I think that at that visit I 
 recommended taking out about ten or a dozen of the animals 
 and putting them in the horse stable, those that I knew were 
 diseased, and they were moved into the horse stable by them- 
 selves. They were the worst cases there. A good many of 
 the others I never examined until the morning of the slaughter. 
 
 By Mr. Libby : 
 
 Q. Do you think they were all sick ? 
 
 A. They all proved to be, yes, sir, afterwards. 
 
 Q. When you killed these cattle do you think one of us 
 farmers could have discovered they were sick, by their lungs? 
 
 A. Yes ; if a farmer had seen the lungs and did not know 
 they were sick he had no business to be a farmer any 
 longer. There were unmistakable lesions in about every 
 lung. 
 
 By Mr. Rich : 
 
 Q. Did you see them all ? 
 
 A. I saw them all except a very few of that herd. There 
 were two or three that were not opened. Mr. Gowell had 
 
117 
 
 some hesitancy. One or two cows were favorites of his und 
 he did not like to have them cut, and we didn't open them. 
 Several were not opened, because they were very thoroughly 
 diseased, and they were condemned on general principles that 
 they were not fit to live. 
 
 Q. In regard to these cattle : if you did not hear them 
 cough, would there be any way of knowing they were sick ? 
 
 A. That would depend upon circumstances. Some of 
 them tbei'e you could tell. Most anybody who had ever seen 
 the disease could have identified it in those put in the horse 
 stable. 
 
 By Mr. Libby : 
 
 Q. You state that you knew positively ? 
 
 A, Yes, sir, I did. If I hadn't I should not be fit to be on 
 a cattle commission long, because there were some very 
 marked cases. 
 
 Q. What would be the symptoms of the disease in a fat, 
 smooth animal? how would you tell the disease? 
 
 A. The same as in a lean one ; elevation of temperature, 
 auscultation and percussion of the lungs, which is all treated 
 of in my report. General external symptoms, rough, staring 
 coat, standing out of the elbows, and rapid respiration if you 
 move them. 
 
 Q. You are speaking of the last symptoms of the disease 
 now? 
 
 Mr. Walton: — He asks you in the case of a sleek-looking 
 animal. 
 
 Witness : — You could tell by auscultation and percussion 
 of the lungs. 
 
 By Mr. Admits: 
 
 Q. Do you or not believe you would be able to discover 
 tuberculosis quite early after the lungs became affected? 
 
 A. O, yes, most any time after the lungs became affected 
 we ought to be able to diagnose it. By auscultation and per- 
 cussion we can locate the diseased portion of the lung. 
 
 C^. If you gave the diseased creature a little exercise, what 
 would be the result? 
 
118 
 
 A. It would be increased respiration. 
 
 Q. Noticeable ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. They would have only a portion of sound 
 lung tissue to breath through, and the breathing Mould be 
 more rapid. 
 
 By Mr. Rich : 
 
 Q. You do not find the flesh to go oft' until after suppura- 
 tion ? 
 
 A. No, sir. Emaciation is in the later stages as a rule; 
 emaciation, debility, diarrhoea, set in and follow each other 
 rapidly. 
 
 By Mr. Adams : 
 
 Q. Is it a fact that sometimes animals in earl}' stages of 
 this disease will take on fat more rapidly than when well? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, that is the rule in a great many cases. 
 
 Q. From all you have read in regard to the contagion of 
 this disease, from all you know of it in other cases, what do 
 you say with regard to ihe contagion as demonstrated by the 
 facts of the disease at Orono? 
 
 A. In all well advanced stages of it I have no doubt about 
 the contagion. There are stages of it in which I should doubt 
 its contagion. 
 
 Q. Have you or not reason to suppose that the disease 
 made more rapid progress there in the cattle than j'ou have 
 ever known through your knowledge or from writers — than it 
 usually does? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, I think this is the most virulent attack I have 
 ever known or read about ; I do not think we have a case on 
 record where it approached such rapid conclusions as it did 
 there. That disease had existed in that herd for a long time. 
 They had enough there through the terms of the various 
 superintendents to leaven the whole lump. They had had 
 animals there with that disease coming down all the way 
 through, and the animals that Gowell bought and carried 
 there were brought in contact with those diseased animals. 
 They were well when. they were carried there, and I have no 
 doubt about the soundness of the herds from which those 
 
119 
 
 animals were bought. When he brought in new ones there 
 was always enough of the old stock left to infect those brought 
 in. 
 
 Q. Have you or not an idea of the tirst creature diseased 
 there ? 
 
 A. As far as we are able to trace it, it is given in my re- 
 port as the cow sold to Mr. Boarduian by Mr. Farrington in 
 '76, ten years ago. That is the tirst animal to which we have 
 been able to trace the disease. Mr. Gowell has assisted me 
 in that. 
 
 Q. Have you been able to trace that cow back to a con- 
 taminated parentage or herd? 
 
 A. I have not. 
 
 Q. State to the committee your professional opinion as to 
 transmitting this disease to the human family through the 
 milk by disease of the cow. 
 
 A. There is no doubt of it on earth, in my opinion, in 
 many cases; there are certain stages of it where 1 think it 
 would be developed. 
 
 JSIr, Libby : — What would be those stages ? 
 
 A. I think where you had nothing but miliary deposits it 
 would be very doul)tful about transmitting it by way of the 
 milk. But I think where the mammary glands are aftected, 
 or tubercles broken down, you may get contamination through 
 the milk. 
 
 By Mr. Adams: 
 
 Q. What is this disease, and what is there about it difterent 
 from any other disease? 
 
 A. No difference between this disease and consumption in 
 the human family. 
 
 Q. I mean peculiar to the disease in cattle. What is the 
 difterence between a diseased spot in this and in the disease 
 of pleuro-pneumonia? I mean right in the tissue itself? 
 
 A. In pleuro-pneumonia the lung is congested and solidi- 
 fied, and we get a marbleized appearance. In tuberculosis 
 we have diflerent portions of the lung affected, and we 
 may have a diseased lung and still have left perfectly sound 
 
120 
 
 portions of it. Tubercles form and grow, being at first a 
 miliary deposit, finally progressing until they break down into 
 pus, which when freed is coughed up and given up in the air 
 expired by the animal. In this is the bacilli or specific germ, 
 which is a thread-like particle, or filament, in width about one- 
 fifth of its length and in length a half or two-thirds the width 
 of a red blood-corpuscle. 
 
 Q. Do you understand that this disease can or cannot be 
 propagated without one of these filaments ? 
 
 A. I understand it cannot by contagion. 
 
 Q. And that in all cases of tuberculosis this peculiarity is 
 found ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir ; you have got to have that specific germ to 
 propagate it. I think it is the same identical germ that is in 
 human consumption- I think we get the same in the human 
 lung. They both have the same results, and would inoculate 
 a man from an animal or an animal from a man. The disease 
 can be transmitted, decidedly. 
 
 Bij Mr. Walton : 
 
 Q. Do you mean to say that the disease itself can be trans- 
 mitted, or a tendency towards the disease? 
 
 A. Both. There is a pre-disposition in the very animals 
 with which we are dealing in this case (in Jerseys) to con- 
 sumption. Inbreeding has contributed a good deal to that 
 pre-disposition in that class of cattle. That is, inbreeding 
 weakens the animal. They have narrow chests and weak 
 lungs, and are more susceptible to the disease. There is a 
 great difierence in the susceptibility of animals to the disease, 
 one taking it readily and one resisting it with the same sur- 
 roundings. 
 
 Q. So your idea is that a calf may be dropped with the 
 germs all developed in the lungs or any part of the calf? 
 
 A. Yes, sir ; time and time and time and again we have 
 had cases to prove that. They become diseased in utero. 
 The very fact of abortion shows that. The case of the Wil- 
 lard Insane Asylum to which I have alluded in my report 
 
121 
 
 •shows that calves aborted from diseased cows were full of 
 tubercles. 
 
 By Mr. Adams : 
 
 Q. Does, or not, the disease often seize the uterus first? 
 
 A. Yes, the uterus, the fallopian tubes and the ovaries 
 become affected. In a good many cases the animals fail to 
 breed, and many did at Orono. 
 
 Q. If a cow was diseased in the womb with tubercles, and 
 should have a calf, in what condition would you expect to 
 find that calf? 
 
 A. I should expect to find it in a diseased condition when 
 dropped. 
 
 By Mr. Walton: 
 
 Q. When tubercles first commence to form, isn't the dis- 
 ease there in the blood of that animal ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, -most certainly. 
 
 Q. Then why wouldn't the milk be unhealthy even so early 
 as that? 
 
 A. The milk in those cases would be more especially im- 
 pregnated with it if the mammary glands were affected. We 
 found cows at Orono whose milk was very bitter from the 
 •disease. 
 
 Q. Suppose a cow appeared healthy, but had the disease 
 about her and the tubercles had begun to form. She would 
 have the disease in her blood ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, in the later stages. 
 
 Q. Then could the milk be properly said to be healthy? 
 
 A. It would be almost impossible to tell just how much 
 the caw would have to be affected. You would find the germ 
 in the milk if it was affected. 
 
 Q. If the blood was unhealthy through the disease lurking 
 in the system, must not the milk be more or less affected? 
 
 A. I should expect it to be. 
 
 By Mr. Adams: 
 
 A. Are, or oat, these bacilli found in the early stages of tu- 
 •berculosis? 
 
122 
 
 A. Yes, sir, they are there all the time, but are not 
 freed until the tubercles break down and liquefy. 
 
 Q. Now, in the early stages of tuberculous deposit these 
 bacilli are found, and they are the elements of transmitting the 
 disease ; and would or not there be some danger of transmit- 
 ting the disease at that time to a child through the milk? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, by the milk. 
 
 Q. The milk would contain them if the blood did, would it 
 not? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, most probably. 
 
 By yir. Bich: 
 
 Q. When you find bacilli, then, do you not consider the- 
 milk impure ? 
 
 A. Most certainly. 
 
 Q. Unsuitable to use, and it would be poison to a child? 
 
 A. It would affect a child, because their powers of absorp- 
 tion are much more active than in grown people. In a mail' 
 what might simply disturb th<j digestive organs would prove- 
 fatal to a child. There is not a doubt that it is contagious b}^ in- 
 gestion, as is proved by the disease in the hogs from the offal 
 of slaughtered cows killed on account of the disease. There 
 have been a number of experiments of feeding milk to pig* 
 which have demonstrated and proved the position I take. 
 Veterinary surgeons have experimented very extensively on 
 rabbits, guinea-pigs, foxes and other animals, and are able- 
 to propagate the disease in them by it. 
 
 By Mr. Libhy : 
 
 Q. None of the meat would be poisonous if cooked ? 
 
 A. That would kill every germ in it and make it harmless. 
 Heated to 212 will do that. 
 
 Q. Do you have an idea that the lungs of this Kent bull 
 or any part of them would show any disease that a farmer or 
 any man could detect? 
 
 A. I should not think they would. Externally they did 
 not show any to me. They were sent to me by express, and 
 until I made the section I failed to discover anything wrong in 
 them. They looked fair. 
 
123 
 
 Q. Now don't you think that under ordinary circumstances, 
 if that hull had been kept in airy quarters and in a healthy 
 herd, he might have lived ten years? 
 
 A. He might have lived ten years- I will admit. They 
 sometimes live to a good old age with tubercles in their lungs. 
 It is a chronic disease, but still is very progressive in a good 
 many cases. In some cases it might terminate fatal!}- in 
 three mouths, what would be galloping consumption in a man. 
 That Kent bull was out of Princess Alba, and she was one of 
 the very worst cases at Orono. We killed her in March, 
 and she dropped the bull Kent had the previous June. And 
 with the great amount of deposit she had in her lungs when 
 we killed her — Gilbert said I was crazy to kill her — I do not 
 think any sane man would advise even unofHcially the use of 
 that bull. His lungs percussed clear, but he had a staring 
 coat that I didn't like the looks of; it stood out pretty well 
 on him. When I saw him in July I do not think anj'body 
 would have discovered any apparent disease about him ; but 
 when I found he was out of Princess Alba I did not think it 
 was possible that he was fit to serve. 
 
 That Kent bull was in bad condition enough, beyond any 
 doubt on earth, to have transmitted it to his otlspring, at the 
 time he was killed, but I do not think an expert could have made 
 out enough disease in that bull at the time I first saw him to 
 condemn him. If I had examined that bull and found no trouble 
 except in the lung, I should still say that he could have trans- 
 mitted the disease to his offspring. He had enough in the lung 
 to transmit it. A bull can do a great deal more mischief in a 
 year than a cow. 
 
 By Mr. Allen: 
 
 Q. Would you advise the kilhng of those other bulls that 
 went out from the College fiirm if they could be found? 
 
 A. I would advise just as I always have. I would have 
 them all inspected and killed if necessary. 1 would kill 
 every one that showed the disease. I would not use one of 
 them or advise any one else to do so under any circumstances, 
 because I know they were all out of thoroughly diseased 
 
124 
 
 dams and I do not think it is right and proper to use them 
 for stock purposes. 
 
 By Mr. Adams: 
 
 Q. Suppose you should kill a number of those bulls, find- 
 ing half of them diseased that you did kill, what would you 
 recommend about killing the others of them? 
 
 A. 1 would recommend feeding them otF for beef. If they 
 &re well enough for that, that is what ought to be done with 
 Ihem. I have seen none of them except the Kent bull. If 
 there was disease in an animal it could positively be discov- 
 ered by an autopsy. If an animal were slaughtered and 
 showed no signs of disease to an experienced eye I should say 
 it would be perfectly safe to eat it ; if there was the disease 
 germ lurking in the animal's whole anatomy it would be de- 
 stroyed by cooking. If such an animal showed no signs of 
 disease to an experienced eye I should say he was wholesome 
 and safe ; no doubt about it. 
 
 Mr. Libby : — A good many of those animals in the College 
 herd should have been eaten? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, I think so. I know Gov. Robie said if they 
 would send some of it to him he would agree to eat it. That 
 is what he told me. 
 
 By Mr. Walton: 
 
 Q. If that disease is in the blood, is the milk safe at any 
 time? 
 
 A. I do not regard it so. 
 
 Q. And the disease must be in the blood if it begins to 
 show by a deposit, even if it is simply a hardened material of 
 the lung? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. In other words, if it was not in the blood you would 
 not find any deposit at any stage ? 
 
 A. It must be in the blood to find a deposit. 
 
 Q. Then, granting that it is in the blood, can the milk 
 which comes from the blood be healthy and proper food for a 
 ohild, in your judgment? 
 
125 
 
 , A. The milk that was nourished by that impure blood 
 would be impure milk, most certainly, and while it might not 
 poison a man, T think it would disturb his digestion. He 
 might have to drink considerable of it to be affected by it, 
 but he could drink enough to be. I think if the lymphatics 
 are affected, even if the tubercles are not broken down, that 
 the milk would be unfit to use. 
 
 By Mr. Cornish: 
 
 Q. Tell the committee in your own way what took place 
 between the Commissioners in regard to the Kent bull? 
 
 A. I was notified July 27th by an official notice from Mr, 
 McAlister as chairman of the selectmen of Bucksport to 
 come to Bucksport and see a bull bought from the College 
 herd. 1 went and saw the Kent herd, and as I say to you, 
 and stated to Gilbert on my return, the bull appeared 
 well, and I put Kent off by saying I would go and consult 
 Gilbert and see what could be done. I did not know what 
 cow that bull was out of, and I immediately communicated 
 with Go well and found he was out of one of the worst cases 
 there. I wrote to Gilbert and he thought the business didn't 
 deserve a call from me ; he knew all about it before and 
 said we had no proof that the animal was from diseased par- 
 entage. 1 sent GowcH's letter to Gilbert, that the calf wa» 
 from one of the worst cases, supposing he might modify hi& 
 view. He did not, however, and said a decision from me 
 that the bull was diseased would bind the College to refund ^ 
 and if Kent didn't want to use him he could sell him. I was 
 taken sick in August and had a severe attack of sickness, 
 confined to the house some six weeks, and in the meantime 
 nothing was done about it. Finally I saw Gilbert, and Kent 
 had written to me about it. Gilbert said he would speak to 
 the Governor and Council about it and see what could be 
 done. Nothing was done about it. Finally Kent sent me a 
 letter, which 1 have here, with a request from Mr. McAlister 
 that I would present that communication to the Governor and 
 Council, which was on Oct. 9th. 
 
126 
 
 (Witness read letter from McAlister dated Oct. 9th ; also 
 letter dated Oct 8th ; as follows :) 
 
 Bucksport, October 9, 1886. 
 
 Dear Sir: — I enclose Mr. Kent's letter to you. I trust the matter will 
 
 be disposed of at tlie next session of Governor and Council, that Mr. Kent 
 
 may know what to do. 
 
 Respectfully yours, 
 
 G. W. McAlister. 
 
 Bucksport, October 8, 1886. 
 Dr. Bailey : 
 
 Dear Sir — I have been informed that the Governor and Council meet the 
 14th of this month, and as nothino^ has been done in regard to that animal 
 I bought of Mr. Gowell ot the diseased herd of the State farm. I thought 
 I would write you how I feel about the matter. I cannot believe those 
 gentlemen can be so unjust as to try and make me lose that animal or so 
 «nwise as to have him kept in this, or any other, county in the State. I 
 shall be a great loser at the best. I shall lose one year's service of my 
 own cows and their calves besides what I might have had from the public, 
 for I dare not use him. I am a poor man, my farm is under one thousand 
 -dollars mortgage, and I have worked hard for twenty years grading up 
 and buying such animals as 1 thought come within my reach, until I have 
 a herd of Jerseys I feel proud of, and am not ashamed for any man to see, 
 -even Gov. Robie and his Council, and to have them all swept away in two 
 or three years by using that bull is more than I could bear; it would ruin 
 me, for I am too old a man to begin again where I did begin twenty years 
 ago. and I have not the means to do any different. If I had had means I 
 would have killed him long ago, but as it is, I have kept him in strict 
 quarantine ever since the disease broke out on the State farm. He has 
 not been allowed to go with any cattle of any kind, I have hauled water 
 for him half a mile all through the drouth, fed him hay and grain all sum- 
 mer, believing something just and honorable would be done by the State 
 •officers. 
 
 I bought him in good faith, took the best of care of him. and to get an 
 animal that would bring certain ruin upon myself and herd, according to 
 the I'eport to Gov. Robie of the Doctors at the State Herd, is, 1 think, de- 
 •cidedly unjust and cruel in the extreme for a poor man without some re- 
 compense from some source. I do not know who may be liable, but it does 
 look to me there is some one to back this whole thing and some one to 
 make it good. 
 
 Brother Gilbert, Z. A., for such I will call him, for we both belong to 
 the order of P. of H., advised me to keep him and use him; Mr. Gowell 
 of the State farm did the same. Wonder if Mr. Gilbert would buy him 
 for his own herd or for the College farm when they stock up again ; if so, 
 I will keep him for them. I do not know what the gentleman can be think- 
 ang about. It would be no worse to have another herd exterminated on the 
 
 k 
 
127 
 
 arm than to have two or three towns in Hancock County have this conta- 
 gious disease and cost the State the same amount of money. There is too 
 (mucli risk in using him in any community, private or publicly, and he must 
 ■be got out of the way some way or other (imless the State officers take 
 the responsibility upon themselves). , 
 
 I think it is a shame and imposition to advise the use ot such an animal. 
 We can scarcely take up a paper but we see something of this terrible 
 scourge in some part? of our country, and thousands upon thousands of 
 dollars is lost by its fatality, and shall we let it spread in our own beloved 
 State when so small a sum (for I onlj' ask for tiflty dollars) and a little cau- 
 tion will put an end to the whole thing? 
 
 I think I have had great patience, for I have waited something like six 
 months to know what disposition would be made with my ease by the 
 officers of the State, and it is but just and right for them to say what they 
 will do or if they intend to try to throw the loss upon me. I want to know, 
 when the Governor and Council meets, what they will do, that I may know 
 how to act on my part. 
 
 The correspondence with the State officers has been done mostly by Mr. 
 McAlister and Mr. Cunningliam. our town officers ; they have taken great 
 interest in this matter that the disease should not spread in this commun- 
 ity. 
 
 I have great respect for your gentlemanly visit at our place and I shall 
 ■hold you in great esteem as a true and faithful officer of the State. 
 
 Hoping that this matter will be justly and honorably disposed of im- 
 mediately, I will remain. 
 
 Very truly yours, 
 
 S. H. Kent. 
 
 Dr. Bailey : — I presented Mr. Kent's letter to the Gover- 
 nor and Council and asked them for their advice about the 
 matter, but they could only act as advisory to us, and the 
 matter was finally left to Mr. Hatch, as I understood it. 
 Nothing was done about it until I received a letter from Mr. 
 McAlister saying if the State would pay $25 he would have 
 the bull killed. I made that proposition to Gilbert and he 
 would have nothing to do with it, and said he had no com- 
 promise to make. I told McAlister if he would take $20 1 
 would pay it myself for the privilege of seeing the lungs of 
 the animal. He accepted my offer and sent the lungs to me 
 by express. I sent a part of them to New York and kept a 
 a part of them myself until I could make use of them. I 
 made a section and found some miliary deposits, and found 
 tubercles in the lung. I sent the upper lobe of the lung to 
 
128 
 
 Dr. Michener. I have the letter stating what he found. I 
 have more than one letter from him. I consulted him when 
 my attention was first called to the bull and asked his opinion 
 about it, and I received this letter in reply to it. (Witness 
 reads letter). 
 
 Dr. Bailey, D. V. 8. : 
 
 Dear Sir — Your letter of 14th is rec'd. 1 do not see how any one can 
 advise the keeping of said bull for service. 
 
 It must be remembered that tuberculosis is held to be hereditary by all 
 best authorities, both human and veterinary. If this be true, and I believe 
 it to be so unquestionably, then this particular animal is certainly an un_ 
 safe sire, or to put it differently, is a sire almost certain to propagate the 
 disease. He should be killed. 
 
 Mrs. M. is at present out of the city and my work for the Bureau of 
 Agricultural Industry will, I fear, keep me from getting down to Maine 
 this summer. 
 
 With kindest regards to all, I am. 
 
 Sincerely yours,. 
 
 .(Signed) Ch. B. Michener. 
 
 He also wrote me on Nov. 19th. (Witness reads letter of^ 
 that date.) 
 
 My Dear Doctor: — Your letter rec'd. i do not remember what L «fc L 
 was made to refer to, but most likely "lungs and lymphatic glands in volved.'' 
 In some cases I used L. L. (without the &) to mean left lung. O. K^ 
 means all right, but I do not remember now of any grown animals that 
 were entirely free. Those two cases are probably an error, then. 
 
 I am glad you wrote me concerning this, as it gives me an opportunity 
 to say that by chance I saw a portion of lung left by j'ou at the Am. Vet. 
 College, said to be from the "Kent bull" (Dr. Liautard told me), a calf of 
 one of the cows of Orono herd. These lungs show unmistakable lesions 
 of tuberculosis. Why don't you hunt up all such bulls and have them de- 
 stroyed'? There can be but little doubt that they will all sooner or later 
 develop this disease. They will serve to extend it in many herds when 
 their services are required. The Corn's and the State Veterinarian more 
 than all will be, I think, directly responsible for every case of such exten- 
 sion. In the eyes of all veterinarians you will deserve censure if you fail 
 to follow up each animal. They may yet be used as beef. Probably your 
 hands are tied. I think this the case, for I know you well enough to 
 judge that you are not one to avoid a duty, no matter how unpleasaat. 
 With regards to all, I am, 
 
 Sincerely yours, 
 
 (Signed) Ch. B. Michener. 
 
129 
 
 Dr. Michener was present at the College and actoil with me 
 when the herd was shiughtered. There were also two heifers out 
 of Princess Alba that had been killed, Jersey Lily andCrnmniie, 
 28 and 29 of my post-moftem list. They were killed by Mr. 
 Gowell previous to my knowing anything about the herd, in '85 
 some time, one in March, I think, and one later. Those are the 
 two stiff-neck heifers, a symptom which they connected with a 
 high trough. Awry neck is a symptom of tuberculosis. The 
 glands in the neck become affected and it makes them carry 
 their necks awry. I heard Gowell testify as to the stiff-neck 
 heifers. I thirtk they were suffering from tuberculosis, and 
 their beino: out of Princess Alba more than confirms me in 
 that opinion. I first knew where these other bulls were when 
 Mr. Gowell gave the list to the committee the other evening. 
 I had not known anything about them before that time. I 
 had talked with Mr. Gilbert about it at my house, and had 
 endeavored to have him tell me where they were if he knew ; 
 I do not know whether he know or not. I never asked him 
 directly whether he knew where they were. I told him if he 
 would show me the bulls I would agree to show tubercles in 
 some of them, and eat them if I did not. 
 
 Q. State what took place at the meeting of the board Oct. 
 20th at 3'our house. 
 
 A. The three commissioners came to my house. I had 
 been sick, and we had quite a discussion over the subject of 
 what should be done with those bulls. And 1 was very urgent 
 that they should be inspected and something done about them, 
 and Gilbert was just as urgent that nothing should be done 
 about them, for which he gave two reasons ; one was that we had 
 no law that would enable us to have anything to do with them, 
 and if we did we had no proof, only a suspicion that they 
 were diseased. Those are the two positions he took. I told 
 him I thought we had abundant proof after seeing the lungs 
 of the dam he came from, and knowing that other animals 
 from the same dam were thoroughly diseased, and I could 
 not see it in any other light. We could not agree about it. 
 
 9 
 
130 
 
 The other two agreed with me, and there it hung. I told 
 Gilbert in regard to the report that if we remained of the 
 same opinion I did not see how we could sign any report, 
 knowing that he would not sign any I could make, and I 
 could not sign any he would make ; and the matter was left 
 there, and nothing was said about it for some time afterwards. 
 I oftered to give him access to all my correspondence and 
 authorities and let him and Bell make any report they liked 
 and I would have nothing to do with it, or make a report of 
 our whole proceedings, if he would sign my recommendation 
 for the destruction of those bulls. 
 
 By Mr. Walton: 
 
 Q. Are there any further letters that you have not pro- 
 duced ? 
 
 A. I have other letters. I have a letter from Gilbert under 
 date of Jan. 29th. I have other letters from him, some re- 
 ferring directly and some indirectly to the cases at Orono. I 
 do not think all the letters I have bear directly upon the 
 question. 
 
 Mi\ Walton [After looking at letters] : — I guess you had 
 better read them. 
 
 (Witness thereupon read letter dated Jan. 29, 1887, as 
 
 follows ;) 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture. ) 
 
 North Greene, Jan. 29, 1887. ) 
 
 Dr. Bailey : — Your letter found at College. Am glad to have confidence 
 confirmed that there was no treacherjr between you and me. You need 
 not fear any conspiracy against you at the College for they have always 
 stood by you, and sworn by your authoritj'^ at all times. The onlj^ trouble 
 was that lying rascal between you and them. 
 
 I sent your Report yesterday. It is exactly in conformity with the 
 date you kindly sent me save that I left out some cases where there was 
 no disease found. 
 
 I saw McAlister Thursday evening and talked over the bull case. He 
 says plumply that he agrees exactly with me as to the application of the 
 law to that— 
 
 [The remaining portion of this letter was not to be found among the papei-s. Stenographer.] 
 
131 
 
 Q. Who was that "lying rascal" referred to in that letter, if 
 you know? 
 
 A. I know quite positively who it was. 
 
 Q. Who did you understand it was? 
 
 A. Hall C. Burleigh. We had just been writing in refer- 
 ence to him, and he sent me that back. I had received a 
 letter from Gilbert after the hearing before the committee 
 (Witness reads letter dated Jan. 21st, as follows:) 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture. \ 
 
 North Greene, Jan. 21, 1887. i 
 Dr. Bailey : 
 
 Dear Sir:— All wlio lifanl you the other day before the Committee 
 understood at <)nce ihat you was siding for Burleigh in a malicious attack 
 upon me. It was a gr»'at surprise to me that you should do so, for our 
 relations have heeu pleasant hitherto throughout our association together, 
 and I am sorry to have these relations thus marred, not only as between 
 us, but also to give it away to the public. 
 
 Kegretting it more than words can express, and still more regretting 
 that it has gone where it cannot be recalled. My Report is in type. 
 
 I am 
 
 Resp'y yours, 
 
 (Signed) Z. A. Gilbert. 
 
 — I immediately wrote to Mr. Gilbert that there was not a 
 word of truth in my having any malicious intention toward 
 him. I had seen him at the meeting and I shook hands with 
 him after the meeting, and in a day or two after I got that letter. 
 I did not know what it meant, and I wrote him stating it was 
 understood difterently between us, and that was all as far as 
 I was concerned. 
 
 (Witness read letters dated Jan. 25, Feb. 1, '87, and March 
 13, '86, as follows:) 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture, ) 
 
 Augusta, Jan, 25, 1887. ) 
 
 Dr. Bailey : — Your letter of last evening was duly received and it gave 
 me much pleasure to be assured that there was no intent on your part to 
 aid Mr. Burleigh with his malicious work against me. I now realize that 
 I ought not to have countenanced the idea for a moment, but you will, I 
 know, pardon me for being sensitive when my honesty is assailed and prob- 
 
 I 
 
132 
 
 ably I was. and my friends shared it with me, over suspicious on one or 
 two points. On the whole I think you helped me much more than you 
 did Burleigh. In fact I do not think you substantially corroborated him 
 in any particular. 
 
 I have taken your data and have made up as accurate a report of our 
 "doings" as I knew how to. I add nothing to it whatever, leaving it a 
 naked statement of what we have done, and I sign it as President of the 
 Commission. I would be glad indeed to submit it to 5'ou before present- 
 ing to the legislature if there were an opportunity. If you are likely to 
 come this way soon I will hold it for you to see on information to that 
 effect. Please let me know. 
 
 Allow me to set you aright on one matter. / never had a word of discord 
 with Mr. Burleigh in my life., and the "quarrel" is wholly on one side. 
 
 The decision of the Committee is unanimous in my favor and the case 
 is dismissed without further hearing. 
 
 Doctor, I now have a direct question to ask of you. I have been told 
 to-day that two of the Commissioners were making up a report of our 
 doings to be presented to the Legislature. I can't for a moment believe 
 you are doing this, and ask you frankly to inform me if you are not doing 
 it. Mr. Burleigh made the above statement this afternoon. 
 
 Now, Doctor, having received the assurance that your friend y feelings 
 toward me still continue, I wish to assure you of mine in return ; and 
 trusting this confidence is fully reciprocated I am 
 
 Resp'y yours, 
 
 Gilbert. 
 
 Augusta, Me., Feb. 1, 1887. 
 
 Dear Doctor: — Enclosed find Dr. Gerrish's letter which was overlooked 
 when I wrote last. 
 
 I go to Augusta to-morrow and shall go to Portland with this letter 
 and will call at your house. Fearing I may not find you at home, I send 
 the letter of Dr. Gerrish by mail. 
 
 I want to see you much, for there are matters we ought to talk over, 
 
 and must do so. There is lots of lying about you as well as me, and I 
 
 know we have both worked fiiithfuUy, and events have proved we have 
 
 worked efficiently in these matters. I want to see you about some of these 
 
 matters in which we are jointly concerned. 
 
 Yours, 
 
 G. 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture, \ 
 
 North Greene, March 13, 1886. / 
 
 Dr. Bailey : — I staid up to GowelPs to complete some work, among the 
 rest to draw up enclosed papers which I wish you to sign and forward to 
 Mr. Gowell. They will cover the forms of law in our action. 
 
 I ought to be with you in case Dr. Salmon visits the cattle and I see no 
 other way than that I must. 
 
133 
 
 You will bear in mind that niy mail from Portland leaves that point on 
 the 1.20 P. M. train and reaches me at 6i In the evening. If y»u have 
 occasion to telegraph to me send dispatch to Greene with orders to for- 
 ward by special messenger. It is a railroad station but they do public 
 business. 
 
 Also send word to Mr. Fergufton, Monroe, and have him go up with ns. 
 
 Yours, 
 
 Gilbert. 
 
 I think those are all the lette?s I have frorn Gilbert that 
 bear directly upon the case ; they are all I have been able to 
 find. 
 
 (Witness also reads letter dated Oct. 30th, '86, as follows :) 
 
 State of Maine. 
 
 Board of Agriculture, 1 
 
 North Greene, Oct. .30, 1886. / 
 
 Dr. Bailey :— Returning this noon find your letter. Regret j'our decision 
 very much for I believe you are doing wrong. You will oblige me by 
 returning my last letter to you. 
 
 Enclosed you will find the letters you refer to. 
 
 If you go to Orono please report what you decide upon, for f have some 
 
 business depending upon your action. 
 
 Yours. 
 
 Gilbert. 
 
 By Mr. Gilbert : 
 
 Q. Please state what your decision was that that letter 
 refers to ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. The only copy I have ot" any letter that I 
 have ever written you is the letter of Nov. 13, and the decis- 
 ion I made was that I had decided at that time to withdraw 
 from the Commission and take* no further action as commis- 
 sioner. That letter I suppose — I am saying what I suppose 
 now — refers to one I wrote you (Gilbert) Nov. 13th — no, it 
 does not, because I wrote this afterwards. I do not know 
 whether it refers to my settling the matter of the bull, or 
 not. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert :— It does ? 
 
 A. It does, yes, sir. 
 
 Mr. Gilbert : — You reported tome that you had decided it. 
 
 A. Yes, I decided to pay the $20. 'I'he fact was, when I 
 came down to present the matter of the Kent bull to the Gov- 
 
134 
 
 ernor and Council I found my commission had expired on 
 Sept. 25th. Gov. Robie seemed anxious to reappoint me. I 
 said he had better continue me for the balance of the year, 
 and that would leave Governor Bodwell free to appoint whom 
 he liked. He said he would send the commission to me. I 
 waited but never received any, I do not know for what reason. 
 On Nov. 15th, finding I was not going to get any, I wrote to 
 Mr. Gilbert the letter dated Nov. 15th, which is as follows : 
 
 Portland, November 15, 1886. 
 
 My Dear Sir : — Your letter of Oct. 30th was received during my ab- 
 sence from home, and since then I had learned you had gone east, so de- 
 layed writing you until after I had inspected the College buildings, which 
 I have now done, returning home on Saturday. I believe every detail of 
 recommendations, from both Dr. Micliener and myself, have been faith- 
 fully and honestly complied with, and that the stables are in safe condi- 
 tion as they can be made through the agency of disinfection to receive 
 stock. In your letter of Oct. 30th you say '-you regret my decision very 
 much, for you believe I am doing wrong." As that is far from my inten- 
 tion, I wish you would write me wherein I am doing wrong. 
 
 Is it in settling the Bucksport case upon my own privateaccount (after con- 
 gulting with Mr. Bell, in which he fully concurred with me that some set- 
 tlement ought to be made), or in urging the settlement ot all similar Col- 
 lege cases upon the best terms possible? If the former I have in no way 
 •compromised the State or the commissioners, Mr. McAlister and myself 
 each having agreed to pay the amount, to have the case disposed of; and if the 
 latter, having your decision, both verbal and in writing (Oct. 20th), that 
 it is none of our business to hunt up the cases, and that (Oct. 27th) "you 
 know of no compromise ground you wish to take, and if you should j'ield 
 to the majority, you would still be unconvinced." I have decided to take no 
 farther action as commissioner, and step aside, at a time when I can leave 
 every case that lias so far been called directly to the attention of our board 
 fully disposed of. In taking this step, I certainly hope I do not misunder- 
 stand you, Mr. Gilbert, upon any matters connected with the commission, 
 for while, personally, I have none other than the kindest feelings towards 
 yon, professionally, there is no earthly prospect of my being able to agree 
 with you, and I cannot consent to remain upon the Board, to be regarded 
 as a "disturber ot the peace" or as interfering with the College cases, 
 either complicating their present embarrassments or thei r future prosperity. 
 Having no desire to appear in such a role, "I had rather be right and re- 
 tire than be wrong and remain," and shall always believe my duties to the 
 State to have been conscientiously and faithfully performed, after entering 
 my earnest and official protest against keeping for se?Tice any of the bulls 
 that have been sold (within the last two years) from the College farm, whose 
 dams we killed at Orono, and now known by us to have been thoroughly 
 
135 
 
 diseasfd^ as the hereditary tendency of such :ininiali> would render them 
 almost certain to propagate the disease. Not relying upon the theory of 
 heredity, tiiat appears capable of propagation from parent to progenj- (by 
 which we do not mean that actual diseased condition is necessarily pro- 
 pagated) but more oflen is a diseased condition under trifling influences 
 to develop the disease or one like it. I am willing to abide by what has 
 developed in the only case I have been allowed to see, what I advised 
 before the animal was killed, as well as what l)as developed since the post 
 mortem of the bull at Bucksport. and which 3Ir. Gowell now tells me in 
 the one he expected would first show lesions of the disease, as his 
 dam was one of the worst cases at Orono. I believed it to be as much the 
 xlutyot the Cattle Commissioners to prevent disease (when possible to do) 
 as to stamp it out after it has made its appearance, and, in my opinion, it 
 -would be a God-send to the College, if all the outstandinE: cases could be 
 settled upon as liberal terms as the one at Bucksport. 
 
 I return the letter you ask for (that of Oct. 27th) and if there are any 
 others you have written me you would like to have I will return them» 
 while I am willing to abide bj'' any opinions or statements I have made to 
 you as the only vindication I shall ever need for any act of mine while 
 Commissioner for Maine. 
 
 G. II. B. 
 
 Bt/ Ml'. Cornish : 
 
 Q. First, Doctor, will you state to the committee the con- 
 versation you had with Mr. Gowoll wlicn 3 ou went there the 
 first time ? If you have any memorandum book containing any 
 of the minutes, just state them. 
 
 A. I had some talk about the herd, and I took a little 
 memorandum that morning in the barn on an old prescription 
 blank. 1 showed it to Mr. Gowell last week. He said that 
 was as he recollected it. There is not much to it. (The wit- 
 ness at this point read the minutes referred to from his mem- 
 orandum book and said that he had some questions which 
 Prof. Fernald wanted him to ask Dr. Liautard). 
 
 Q. Did you communicate those questions to him? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, I did. 
 
 Q. Did you receive a reply from him ? 
 
 A. I did. I looked for that letter. Mr. Gilbert asked me 
 for it and I was unable to find it. 
 
 Q. Do you recollect the purport of his answers? 
 
 A. Yes; I think I do generally; he decided that the milk 
 was dangerous to use in all those cases, and I showed his 
 
136 
 
 letter to President Fernald. He saw the letter in answer,, 
 and I have failed to put my hand upon it. He decided in the 
 affirmative in all those different stages. 
 
 By Mr. Walton: 
 
 Q. While you are on those milk questions, as I have had 
 some questions handed in in relation to using the milk after 
 boiling it, Dr. Bailey, I will ask you to state if you think 
 there is anv danjjer from using the milk under such circum- 
 stances. 
 
 A. If the milk is boiled, I think it would be rendered per- 
 fectly harmless, if the degree reached 212, I think that would 
 kill every disease germ that could possibly be contained in 
 the milk ; there is no doubt of that. That would render it 
 perfectly safe to use ; that is the general advice of veterinary 
 surgeons, — if they use milk that is from diseased cows, to 
 take the precaution to boil it. 
 
 By Mr. Cornish: 
 
 Q. Your views on this matter are carefully embodied m 
 your report to the Legislature? 
 
 A. Yes, sir; I think they were called so. 
 
 Q. Have you any reason to change your views on any 
 point there submitted ? 
 
 A. I don't know of any change that I wish to make. 
 
 Q. Your report does not contain any of the doings of the 
 Commission other than as relates to this tuberculosis at the 
 State College. 
 
 A. I can explain that very easily. I had only a few days 
 before furnished Mr. Gilbert with the items of all my visits 
 as Commissioner during the year 1885-86 ; he had copied it 
 in his report. This report of mine was intended for the use 
 ol the UnitedStates Veterinary Association, that meets in Phil- 
 adelphia this month — that I intended to present to them as a 
 clinical report of these cases, because they were so interesting. 
 When I was asked by the House and Senate for the majority 
 report — as they termed it — I took the report I had made with 
 some few modifications that I wished to state and presented it 
 
137 
 
 simply as a report of the College cases. Mr. Gilbert used 
 the same thing over again — that I furnished him. 
 
 Q. The other business you gave him the minutes of? 
 
 A. I did. He asked me to go down and make the report. 
 I told him the best I could do was to furnish all the dabt 
 and he could do it himself, and I would do that cheerfully, 
 and did do so. 
 
 Q. Have you anything else in mind you wish to state to 
 the committee, touching this matter? 
 
 A. I think it would be \^o more than fair to Mr. Gilbert 
 and myself. Something occurred in regard to ignoring Mr. 
 Bell. Two years ago this month Mr. Gilbert and X were in 
 Governor Robie's room, and they wanted to send me up in 
 Washington County to examine a case of glanders in Topsfield, 
 a long route. 1 asked Gov. Robie if I should consult Mr. Bell 
 when I got back. He said no. He says Mr. Bell was ap- 
 pointed for a temporary purpose at the time, for the foot-and- 
 mouth outbreak, and that purpose has been served. That 
 was the statement he made to Mr. Gilbert and myself. Since 
 that time I have looked at it as coming from my superior officer, 
 and I obeyed it. I have seen him in connection with several 
 things since. 
 
 Mr. Bell was asked if he received any notice from me. 
 Mr. Gilbert is always in the habit of notifying the committee, 
 and it has been rather left for him to do that. He told me he 
 was going to call a meeting on the 20th of November. He 
 has always notified Mr. Ferguson. I never notified Mr. Fer- 
 guson or Mr. Bell either. They have always como by no 
 particular arrangement, but he has always done it. 
 
 Q. Have you any other letters touching this matter? 
 
 A. No. 
 
 Q. Who is Mr. Boardman? 
 
 A. He is treasurer of the Gas Company of Bangor ; and io. 
 looking up the first cases that developed upon the College 
 farm I wrote IVEr. Boardman and received his letter. 
 
138 
 
 (Letter dated, "Bangor, Dec. 13th, 1886," was read in evi- 
 dence, together with inclosure dated Feb. 3d, 1877, as fol- 
 lows) : 
 
 Bangor, December 13th, 1886. 
 Dr. Geo. H. Bailey, 
 
 Portland, Me. 
 Dear Sir: — You will please find enclosed copy of receipt of J. R. Far- 
 rington, Esq., as follows: 
 
 "Orono, October 3, 1886, 
 
 State College Farm, 
 
 Per J. R. Farrington. 
 Sold to Henry Boardman, 
 
 One red Grade Jersey Cow Five years old for $40.00, 
 
 Rec'd Payment by check on Farmers' Nat. Bank Bangor. 
 
 J. R. Farrington." 
 
 P. S. This cow he called Susan, I kept her five years, when she became 
 ^6ick and died with what I called consumption ; she gave out all at once, 
 wasted away and died. I buried her hide and all. She always seemed in 
 perfect health until about two months before she died. 
 
 '•Bangor, Feb. 3d, 1877. 
 Received from Harry Boardman 
 
 Fifty dollars 
 on acc't J. R. Farrington, 
 
 Norton & Farrington." 
 #50.00. 
 
 This was for Cow Grade Durham and I bought her on November 25, 
 1876. She always had a cough from the time I received her until I sold 
 her to a butcher March 8th, 1879. She had only one calf and that was a 
 bull and it died when about 3 weeks old. This cow was when killed 
 found to be full of tubercles on the liver and lungs and on the ribs and 
 plates and well up to throat. 
 
 You see this receipt was given by Messrs. Norton & Farrington for 
 J. R. Farrington, as Mr. F. of N. & F. was J. R.'s brother. I was to pay 
 for the cow in sixty days and so on the date of receipt 1 was ordered to 
 pay to them which I did. So this will explain the dates, I think ; any way 
 these are the facts as my books, receipts and orders show them to be, 
 and I know them to be correct. I would like one of your reports when 
 they are printed as I no doubt they will be. I also hope this statement 
 is plain enough and think you will understand it all. Anything more that 
 I can furnish you I should be glad to do and should be pleased to see 
 you whenever you are in our city and can spare time to call on me. 
 
 I Remain Yours Truly, 
 
 Henry Boardman. 
 
139 
 
 That cow was not mentioned in the post mortem — that was 
 in 1876, ten years ago ; that was the primary case that was 
 developed upon the College farm. 
 
 Q. What you read "1886" should be "1876"? 
 
 A. Yes, sir; I think that is an oversight; probably this 
 was the primary ease that developed upon the College farm. 
 
 Q. The year of purchasing this last cow was 1877? 
 
 A. 1876, he purchased in Nov. 1876, and sold her to a 
 butcher March 8, 1879, and we believe that to be the primary 
 case that was developed upon the College farm. The first 
 •case ] am able to trace to the earliest case. 
 
 Q. Have you any other letters. Doctor, touching this mat- 
 ter? You put in a great many last night. 
 
 A. I think I put in all that I had relating to this matter. 
 
 Q. Have you any other from Dr. Michener? 
 
 A. I have got a letter that I didn't read last night, if you 
 would like to see it — from Dr. Michener. I have one "Oct. 
 55th, 1886," which is as follows : 
 
 New York, Oct. 25, 1886. 
 
 My Dear Bailey : — Yoiir letter of 15th inst. has been delayed somewhere. 
 As you see, I've been moving, and that may possibly account for this. Am 
 ■very sorry to hear of your sickness and trust you are rapidly gaining 
 ground now. 
 
 I return your letter enclosed to me, and must say that I can form no 
 opinion whatever from the description given. The statements, no dou])t, 
 are true enough but there is not enough given to enable anyone to form 
 anything more than a guess at the trouble. Can not understand Gilbert's 
 ■attitude concerning the tubercular bulls. The more I see however of 
 '•State Boards" the more convinced I am that they should be made up of a 
 majority of vets, or entirely of them Outsiders can not know what these 
 diseases mean and the}"^ fail to see the trouble and cost they entail by such 
 fool-hardy acts. 
 
 With sincere regards to you all and hoping to hear soon of your com- 
 plete recovery, I am. 
 
 Cordially yours, 
 
 (Signed) Micliener. 
 
 Witness : — That is the only letter I have from Michener 
 that I did not furnish last night. 
 
 Q. Is there any other statement, Doctor, that you wish to 
 make? 
 
140 
 
 A. I don't know that I think of anything. I spoke ot that 
 in relation to Mr. Bell because Mr. Gilbert and I both had 
 that view of it — that we were not to consult him any further. 
 He was put on for a temporary purpose and given a com- 
 mission for four years at the time of the foot-and-mouth dis- 
 ease in 1884. His commission still holds over a year. My 
 commission expired September 25th, 1886, supposed I was 
 reappointed by Gov. Robie at that time. 
 
 By Mr. Southard : 
 
 Q. This Boardman letter was received by you ? 
 
 A. It was received in answer to my inquiry to give me a 
 description of those two cows. 
 
 Q. At the time of the killing of the State College herd you 
 had no knowledge of this ? 
 
 A. I had heard of the killing of the cows of Boardman in 
 some indirect way. 
 
 Q. Mr. Boardman may have notified the College ? 
 
 A. I do not understand it so. 
 
 Q. You did not understand the superintendent of the farui, 
 or the trustees had any knowledge of this cow ? 
 
 A. No, sir, I do not. 
 
 Q. You did decide that this cow had germs of consumption* 
 when she was sold away from the farm? 
 
 A. I think she must have had, sir. 
 
 Q. That it developed the time Mr. Boardman bought her? 
 
 A. I do ; in the light of what has transpired. 
 
 Q. Do you think she had germs of disease or predisposition 
 to it? 
 
 A, I should suppose she had germs of the disease in her at 
 the time. I think she had the germs of the disease in her, in 
 all probability, when she was sold from the College farm. 
 Some source must have been prior to that, but I don't know 
 what that source is. 
 
 Q. Regarding this letter of Dr. Michener's. What I wanted 
 to know was whether you represented to Dr. Michener, at 
 this time, that these bulls had tuberculosis? 
 
 A. I represented the fact to him. 
 
141 
 
 Q. Do you think you carried the idea that the cows were 
 diseased, to him? 
 
 A. I don't think I did. 
 
 Q. Would he pronounce the bull unsafe to use that had 
 been dropped from a cow that had afterwards contracted the 
 disease of consumption ? 
 
 A. I don't think he would, sir ; I shouldn't myself, certainly 
 that would be contrary to my views of it, if I knew she con- 
 tracted the disease after the bull was dropped. I don't believe 
 anything attached to that bull was suspicious on account of 
 her afterwards having dropped tuberculosed calves. 
 
 Q. I would like to inquire something about the propaga- 
 tion of this disease ; if I understood you correctly last night 
 it may be transmitted by heredity? 
 
 A. It may by contagion ; yes, sir. By ingestion, inocula- 
 tion, and through the milk. Inoculation would be a species 
 of contagion ; ingestion, by eating of the meat of tuberculosed 
 animals. There would be two wa3';s to contract this disease : 
 first, by heredity; second, by contagion. Now, in heredity 
 there would be first a predisposition to the disease transmitted 
 from the mother or the parent to the child. Some animals 
 and some men have the power to avoid it. There might be 
 the predisposition in that germ. Intermarry cattle — cousins — 
 and it will bring that about. 
 
 Q. That would be general in any inbreeding herd in the 
 State, would it not? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, I think so. 
 
 Q. There would be another way that it might be transferred 
 by heredity and that is by an actual transmission of the germ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, by an actual transmission of the germ, I mean 
 that the calf could be diseased in utei'O, that the bull would 
 have the power to infect the calf in the utero ; that is well 
 settled. It can be transmitted by the sire or dam either. 
 
 Q. Now, if it is simply a predisposition to the disease, that 
 never would develop itself as a disease unless there were a 
 germ came in contact with it? 
 
 A. I think that would be necessary. 
 
142 
 
 Q. And these germs are very generally in the atmosphere? 
 
 A. They are supposed to be ; there is quite a number of 
 theories in regard to germs. Some people think they are of 
 vegetative origin entirely. Some think that it is due to a 
 ferment. There is quite a dispute on that point. 
 
 Q. They are generally diffused ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. An animal with no predisposition to tuberculosis that 
 had the power to throw off these germs would never be affected 
 by it? 
 
 A. It would have more chance to escape ; better able to 
 resist it than if he had not. 
 
 Q. With predisposition he would be less able to resist it 
 and the germ would be more apt to find fertile soil to work 
 upon ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, I think so. 
 
 Q. Did I understand you last night to say that in order for 
 this disease to be contagious the germs must be floating? 
 
 A. They must be freed from somewhere. 
 
 Q. The moment the germ takes root in the body it begins 
 to develop, does it not? 
 
 A. It would be difficult to tell by the looks of the germ 
 under a microscope just how long it had been developed. It 
 is a specific virus in tuberculosis — a specific germ, just the 
 same as a specific germ in glanders and leprosy. We recog- 
 nize the germ and its appearance under a microscope ; they 
 are different in formation. 
 
 Q. So long as there was no breaking down of the tissues, 
 it would not be contagious in that sense? 
 
 A. No, sir ; until there is a breaking down of the tissue it 
 is not, in my judgment, contagious from one animal to another. 
 Certain stages of it would not be contagious. In the early 
 stages I should regard it not contagious. 
 
 Q. Now, you say that you believe this disease has been o» 
 the State College farm for a good many years ? 
 
 A. Since that Boardman case ; I think it has been there 
 ever since that time. 
 
143 
 
 Q. That would go back to 1876? 
 
 A. Ten years. 
 
 Q. Do you believe that between 1882 and the outbreak in 
 1886 there were any active developments of this disease going 
 on at that time? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, I do. 
 
 Q. In what animals? 
 
 A. In the Grade Shorthorn cow that Mr. Gowell had of Mr. 
 Rich. He sa^^s, "she was coughing when I came here ;" those 
 are his own words. One Shorthorn cow — that is, "Maggie 
 3d." In another one, "Rose 8th, the Shorthorn that refused 
 to breed, and upon being slaiiglitcred was found badly 
 aff'ected," as I have before told ^'oii. 
 
 Q. "Maggie 3d," you say on page 58 of your report, "was 
 emaciated and coughed badly." As a matter of fact, do you 
 know whether she was emaciated? 
 
 A. I take Mr. Gowell's statement for that entirely. 
 
 Q. Did Mr. Gowell tell you at her death she coughed 
 badly ? 
 
 A. I have understood him so or else 1 shouldn't have it in 
 that report. That has been my understanding of it, from 
 the report I received. 
 
 Q. Is it not a fact that he told you "Maggie 3d" had a 
 cough when he took her, but she had recovered from that 
 cough, so that she was apparently all right, and then ran 
 down, and he killed her in 1884? 
 
 A. I made that statement in another place. 
 
 Q. I don't think you have made the statement that she 
 didn't cough at the time she died? 
 
 A. I know I have made that statement — that she had de- 
 veloped a cough and got better of it. That is here some- 
 where. 
 
 Q. If she had developed a cough and got better of that, 
 what would that 83'mptom be ? 
 
 A. He says she developed a cough and did good work for 
 a year or two, and afterwards she pined away and died. I 
 think, perhaps, by good care that cow was enabled to go 
 
144 
 
 along a piece further, and some reaction took place and she 
 succumbed to the disease. 
 
 Q. In other words — the disease that was once active be- 
 came dormant? 
 
 A. I don't think it ever left her, though. It is not necessary 
 that the breaking down stop. I think she was able to propa- 
 gate contagion during all that period. He said she was doing 
 good work, I have no doubt of that, from the previous condi- 
 tion, as he described it. 
 
 Q. Turn to page 17 and 18 of your report. "Having been 
 informed by Mr. Gowell, that between the time he became 
 superintendent and his notice to the cattle commissioners, in 
 March last, he had slaughtered five other cows besides 'Mag- 
 gie 3d' and 'Rose 8th,' that all presented the same condition 
 of glands and lungs as the cow Tet.'" Do you understand 
 that he told you all those cows presented the same condition 
 of glands and lungs as the cow "Pet"? 
 
 A. I did understand it so, — at that time. 
 
 Q. Doctor, you got information from Mr. Gowell and 
 intended — 
 
 Witness : — I stated it in good faith when I read my paper 
 before the committee. Since that Mr. Gowell has told me 
 there was an error — having seen the lungs of all those cows ; 
 and I admitted I thought there ought to be a modification of 
 that sentence before the committee. I sought to treat him per- 
 fectly fair in the matter. He has told me so since. 
 
 Q. So that those five cows were not examined? 
 
 A. Not all of them ; part of them were. 
 
 Q. Do you understand that the lungs of "Gray Nose" were 
 examined? 
 
 A. Yes ; I do. Allow me to show you. There is a report. 
 In getting the history of this case I wrote that as I took it 
 from Mr. Gowell's own lips on the morning of March 6th. 
 (Statement read by witness.) I took that from Mr. Gowell's 
 own statement. I will take my oath on that. I think he 
 must have given me to understand at that time they had tu- 
 bercular lungs. I won't dispute anything Mr. Gowell would 
 
145 
 
 say to me. I I)elieYe him to he a man of veracity. That is 
 the statement I took from him at the time. 
 
 Q. Do you know anything about the bull Mr. Gowell sold 
 to a neighbor, that he and the neighbor killed, after the killing 
 of the College herd ? 
 
 A. No; he called my attention to him in a letter; after 
 that I never heard anything more about it at all. He said 
 there was such a case and he would like to have me see it. 
 
 Q. If the lungs of "Gray Nose" and "Jersey Lily" were not 
 examined, and they presented the same symptoms — stiff neck 
 and bunches — that this bull which he sold the neighbor did, 
 and the bull's lungs, upon examination, proved not to be 
 tubercular, what would you say with reference to the lungs 
 of Jersey Lily and Gray Nose? 
 
 A. I should say they were more likely to be diseased than 
 the bull. Jersey Lily was out of Princess Alba — we know 
 she was thoroughly diseased. I don't know what cow the 
 little f)ull was out of. I think they would be more likely to 
 show it than the bull. 
 
 Q. If those bunches and that stiff neck were symptoms of 
 that disease, why were not they present in the bull? 
 
 A. I never saw the bull. I know nothing al)out him. 
 
 Q. This disease broke out, generally, in the herd, at al)ont 
 one time? 
 
 A. It developed very rapidly along toward the last of it ; 
 I judge so. 
 
 Q. In most of those individuals it developed by contagion? 
 
 A. That would be impossible for me to say. According 
 to my theory they were sound when bought, and they must 
 have been affected in that herd — 
 
 Q. Have you made up any judgment as to how long the}' 
 were affected? 
 
 A. That would be impossible for any man to do ; — to see 
 a cow's lung with lesions in it, and tell how long that cow 
 had been affected. 
 
 10 
 
146 
 
 Q. On page 58 of your report — "Glands affected and 
 coughed. Age three months. Purchased when three days 
 old, at Oldtown". Is there any pretention that this heifer 
 had this disease at Oldtown ? 
 
 A. I don't know as there is ; I don't know anything about 
 it. 
 
 Q. You say in your report that the individuals of the herd — 
 that the herd from which they came — were, so far as you 
 could ascertain, all right. 
 
 A. Yes, sir; as far as I have been able to ascertain. 
 
 Q. When did that Roan Heifer contract this disease ? 
 
 A. I think the probabilities all are it was congenital and 
 hereditary both, from that heifer. That would be my belief 
 about it. She was killed. I think it must have been congen- 
 ital and hereditary both. By congenital I mean it was there 
 when she was born. 
 
 Q. Then the herd from which she came is affected by this 
 disease ? 
 
 A. I don't know anything about that, I never was in Old- 
 town in my life. 
 
 Q. If you believe this Roan Heifer to have had this disease 
 when she was born, don't you suppose it is in the herd from 
 which she came ? 
 
 Witness : — I think it is probably in it. 
 
 Q. Why is it you have not investigated that herd ? 
 
 A. I had no business with that herd, and never have had a 
 notice from Oldtown in my life. 
 
 Q. You have not had any more notice that that herd is 
 diseased, than you have or had, prior to the killing of the 
 Kent bull, that he was diseased, have you? 
 
 A. No ; not prior to Jan. 27th. I knew that bull was at 
 Bucksport. 
 
 Q. After Mr. Kent wrote his letter to Mr. Gilbert — after 
 you went down and saw that bull and pronounced him sound, 
 did you have any more — 
 
 A. I had no notice at all as to where the Roan Heifer came 
 from ; knew nothing about it, don't know to-day. I had 
 
147 
 
 only my official notice to i!i:o out and see the Roan Ileifer, and 
 I pronounced her apparently well. A great many diseased 
 animals can appear well and yet l)e thoroughly diseased. 
 They deceived me and the trustees and superintendent of the 
 farm, in that respect, much indeed. 
 
 Q. You said they did not deceive you a particle ? 
 
 A. I beg your pardon — I said nothing of the kind. 
 
 Q. Did not you say — 
 
 A. I said I had not been in that barn ton minutes when I 
 was thoroughly satisfied that that herd was all'ected with tu- 
 berculosis. I also spoke to Mr. Gilbert, who was in the fur- 
 ther end of the barn, coming towaids me, and I was examining 
 some cow I said, "Mr. Gilbert, you have got tuberculosis to 
 deal with here ; there is no pleuro-pneumonia here." I think 
 there were others in the Ixirn — some other gentlemen there, I 
 know. I addressed myself to him at the time. 
 
 Q. If this herd came to the barn in the summer of 1885, 
 looking, as it is said in testimony they did look, you would 
 say from that the same as you said with reference to the Kent 
 bull — that they were apparently well? 
 
 A. Unless I had something to make me suspect or heard 
 them cough or saw one standing as Princess Alba was, with 
 elbows apeak, to give her a better chance to breathe. I don't 
 know as I have ever been told about their conditif)n when 
 they came to the barn. 
 
 (^. You remember the testimony ? 
 
 A. I do not, perhaps, recollect every part of it. 
 
 (^. You know, generally they were in good condition? 
 
 A. The statement was that they were in as good condition 
 when I saw them as any herd I ever saw in my life. I think 
 they must have been in as good condition then as when I saw 
 them ; I do not know that they were better. 
 
 (}. Were not they, in all probability, better? 
 
 A. I judge the probability would favor that idea. 1 did 
 not see them. 
 
 Q. Was not that disease in a stage of advanconienl that 
 was rapidly pulling them down? 
 
148 
 
 A. It must have finally. It must have concentrated itself 
 rapidly to produce the lesions I had found. 
 
 Q. If one of the cows in that herd had come to the barn, 
 or a short time after coming to the barn, had developed this 
 couffh, had l)ec(mie emaciated and run down, and the last 
 week in January had died, or been killed by reason of the 
 disease, what would you say about the outbreak in the whole 
 herd? What would you say as to the time when that herd 
 of cattle contracted that disease ? 
 
 A. I don't think any man could positively state in answer to 
 that question. I don't think a man with one of those lungs 
 on the table, to save his soul, could tell how long it had 
 been in that condition. It is a chronic disease. A man might 
 have a tubercle in his lung and live a hundred years. 
 
 Q. Can not you judge something about the time that this 
 disease was contracted from the fact that in all those fifty 
 cattle the disease manifested itself at the same time ? 
 
 A. I don't think any man would be justified in doing so. 
 
 Q. Is it not an honest inference to draw, in view of the 
 fact that these animals were all diseased, in this advanced 
 stage, at this time, that they contracted the disease at the 
 same time? 
 
 A. I do not think that would be a fair inference to draw. 
 I think some of those may have extended over a long period. 
 It would be impossible for a man to say. 
 
 Q. Do you know, as a matter of fact, when any of those 
 cattle were bought? 
 
 A. Only from what I have been told. 
 
 Q. When do you understand Princess Alba was bought? 
 
 A. In Rockland, 1882 or 1883 ; that is my recollection about 
 it. I stated in my report when she was bought. You will find 
 I ofave the date as I received it from Mr. Gowell's letter. 
 
 Q. Mr. Gowell said it was bought in 1884. 
 
 A. Whatever he said I should rely upon. 
 
149 
 
 Q. You understtind that Jersey Lily was bought with her 
 at the same time in Kockhmd ? Do you take the position that 
 Jersey Lily received this disease by heredity? 
 
 A. That would be rather an unfair question. I don't think 
 any man can decide positively whether she was diseased l)y 
 heredity or contagion. 
 
 Q. I would like to know whether y(ju think it was under 
 these circumstances that she inherited that disease, or whether 
 she caught it? 
 
 (The chair ruled that this question was immaterial, on the 
 ground that inasmuch as the disease had been found to have 
 existed in the animals, all inquiry as to its manner of origin 
 was needless.) 
 
 3Ir. Southard : — The doctor has said in his report, that in 
 none of the herds from which these cattle were taken was 
 this disease developed. 
 
 Witness : — No, sir. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — That it all had its advancement at the 
 State College farm ? 
 
 Witness : — I do not state that. 
 
 Q. Jersey Lily and Princess Alba were bought together. 
 Jersey Lily was the daughter of Princess Alba. I would 
 like to know from the doctor whether under those circum- 
 stances he believes this Jersey Lily inherited her disease or 
 caught it? 
 
 Chair : — If you are testing the doctor's capacity or knowl- 
 edge of these things, I have no objection ; but the committee 
 cannot receive any light from such a question, or an answer 
 to such a question as that. 
 
 Mr. Southard: — On page 15, "In no instance have I been 
 al)le to learn of a sinji'le herd or a single town in Maine from 
 which these animals were purchased, that down to the present 
 time have ever been aifected with tuberculosis." 
 
 Witness : — Yes, sir ; I stated that decidedly. None of 
 these animals have ever been atiected. 
 
 (^. If it existed in those herds you would learn of it? 
 
150 
 
 A. Some of those herds are familiar to me. I have seen 
 the Briggs cattle in Auburn. I wrote inquiring abcnit the 
 dam of this cow. 
 
 Q. What has oeen the result of this inquiry altogether? 
 
 A. In relation to Juno 2d that was sold in Bangor. She 
 went away, I think, in the previous January, 1886. I think 
 I received that information from Mr. Gowcll and President 
 Fernald. She was one of that herd, I suppose. They told 
 me so. 
 
 Q. This was after they came to the barn, previous to their 
 being killed? 
 
 A. I don't know when they came to the barn. 
 
 Q. It was the January, before the April? 
 
 A. I regard it so. 
 
 Q. She was taken away from the herd and carried to Ban- 
 gor, and she was examined by Dr. Michener? 
 
 A. Yes, sir ; I understand so. 
 
 Q. What was the conclusion with respect to her? 
 
 A. He told me he failed to discover lesions of disease about 
 her. That is what he told me ; but she is the mother of one 
 of these cows that we killed and found disease in April. 
 
 Q. I want to know if the fact that she was taken away from 
 that herd in January, never having been afflicted with the 
 disease, would not indicate to your mind that the disease was 
 not contagious at that time ? 
 
 A. No, sir. There are several things that would lead me to 
 that opinion. I have never examined the cow myself. She 
 might appear well to me or Dr. Michener and have a tubercle 
 S0 small that we couldn't diagnose by any external symptoms, 
 and I don't think I would be justified in answering that ques- 
 tion. She is living now, I understand, and the mother of two 
 bulls that have gone out from the farm ; is also the mother of 
 the cow Susie. 
 
 Q. This cow might have caught the disease? 
 A. She might have caught it from some other animal be- 
 sides her dam. 
 
 1 
 
151 
 
 Q. The fact that Jujio 2d is not diseased, and the two bulls 
 she is the mother of, she has not diseased, would indicate that 
 this Susie did not receive her disease by heredity? 
 
 A. You are asking something that I know nothing- ai)out. 
 I don't assume that those bulls arc all right. 
 
 Q. Let us try it. Suppose the fact to be that those two 
 bulls and that cow are all right, does that indicate that Susie 
 received her disease by heredity ? 
 
 A. As long as she was mixed up in that herd she was in 
 mighty bad company. She was in bad company because they 
 had been affected for the last eight or ten years. I take the 
 ground that the animals — the new cows — when Mr. Gowell 
 bought them were all sound, as far as I am able to learn. So 
 1 am led irresistibly to the conclusion that the disease was 
 generally developed and confined and generated in that Col- 
 lege farm. I understood the word generated to mean produc- 
 ing one's own likeness — propagation, that is the proper defi- 
 nition of it. I think it is producing the likeness of one's own 
 self. The way the first case appeared, I think there must 
 have been a prior case to that cow Dora, but we are not al)le 
 to trace it any farther than her. I have been unable to. I 
 exercised all the diligence I was capable of. 
 
 Q. Don't the fact that there are no complaints coming from 
 these bulls, and that they were supposed to be all right going 
 from that herd prior to the winter that they were killed, in- 
 dicate that the herd took the disease that winter? 
 
 A. No, sir ; I do not suppose they are all right myself. I 
 have no idea they are. 
 
 Q. Why don't you follow them up? 
 
 A. I am going to. I have got full power to do so, and I 
 propose to avail myself of it. 
 
 Mr. ^:)Oi(thard : — You might have to find out a number of — 
 
 Wit7}esf< : — I had no authority to find out al)out them. I 
 don't say Mr. Gilbert knew where they were. He didn't tell 
 me. 
 
 Q. When you wrote for information respecting the cattle, 
 you wrote Mr. Gowell? 
 
152 
 
 A. I have had a great many letters from Mr. Gowell ; he 
 has always answered my inquiries freely. I think Mr. Gil- 
 bert spoke to me when I went down there. I said if I knew 
 where they were I would inspect them and look them over ; — 
 if I didn't find tuberculosis in some of them, I would be greatly 
 mistaken. 
 
 Q. Is it not somewhat peculiar that if these individuals, that 
 were taken into that herd at diftercnt times, contracted that 
 disease at the time they were taken in, the disease should 
 break out all at once in the whole herd ? 
 
 Witness : — They had the opportunity to contract the dis- 
 ease every day that they were there. 
 
 A. They didn't have the opportunity till the breaking-down 
 process commenced. 
 
 Q. But you cannot tell how long that breaking-down pro- 
 cess had been continued ? 
 
 A. Not by the appearance of the lung. Dr. Adams and 
 Dr. Rich will tell you they couldn't tell you, if they saw a 
 man's lungs which had cavities — they couldn't tell how long 
 those cavities existed. 
 
 Q. There were some of the pigs examined ? 
 
 A. One pig. 
 
 Q. By whom? 
 
 A. By Dr. Michener and myself. 
 
 Q. And those pigs had been fed with the milk from that 
 herd ? 
 
 A. I don't know as I am in possession fully of that fact. 
 
 Q. Is that what you understood ? 
 
 A. I wouldn't say whether I understood it so or not ; I 
 have forgotten. 
 
 Q. Does not Dr. Michener say, in his report, "that the 
 swine on the farm that had been fed largely on the milk of 
 these cows were examined and one pig nearly a year old was 
 killed and carefully examined, but no traces of the tubercu- 
 losis could be detected?" 
 
 A. I think that was a supposition ; we found no traces of 
 tuberculosis in that pig. He was a little wheezing-looking 
 
153 
 
 pig. Mr. Gowell said he would just as lief have him killed 
 as not. 
 
 Q. If tuberculosis had been iu an active foiiu in that herd, 
 I)erore tliey came (ju to the farm in the winter, and those pigs 
 had been fed with their milk, would not, in all probal)ility, 
 disease have develo[)ed itself in the pigs? 
 
 A. I should think, as a rule, it would. It didn't in that 
 fellow. 
 
 Q. Pigs are very susceptible to it? 
 
 A. I can only speak of the one pig I saw. 
 
 Q. "The butcher who kills the pigs raised on the farm 
 states that in some instances the liver has appeared diseased." 
 Is it a fact that nine pigs out of every ten have abscesses up- 
 on their livers? 
 
 A. They have a condition of the liver that we very often 
 call "waxy", and then they have an oily condition. If you 
 [)ut it on paper it will make it appear as though it was soaked 
 with oil. It is lardaceous in character. The\' have two forms 
 of liver trouble. I never had any talk with the butcher, that 
 I know of, about it ; I don't know whether Dr. Michener said 
 anything to me with reference to it. 
 
 (^. You say, on page sixteen of your report, that "if no 
 animals had ever been sold from the State College herd we 
 could now report the malady as completely and etfectually 
 stamped out." Do you mean that? 
 
 A. I mean it, sir, in its broadest sense as regards the Col- 
 lege farm. 
 
 Q. Do yon confine it to that? 
 
 A. I have no doubt that there are a few isolated cases in 
 Maine that may be affected with tuberculosis. One has de- ^ 
 veloped since this hearing, in Bangor. The ground I take is 
 that we are freer than any State in the country. We have 
 not got one where they have ten in Massachusetts ; one where 
 they have got a hundred in New York. I got a report from 
 the College officials in New York showing that of the milk 
 that is being sold in New York city, 90 pei' cent of it is tuber- 
 culosed. Twenty-nine per cent of the deaths in New York 
 
 I 
 
154 
 
 hospitals are from tuberculosis and 17 per cent of them can 
 be traced directly to the use of tuberculosed milk. I do not 
 mean the malady is completely stopped ; but I think if there 
 were no animals sold from that farm, as far as the College 
 farm was concerned, we could declare it effectively stamped 
 out. In addition to that 1 think there are a few — a very few 
 — isolated cases. The first case I ever saw in this State, (I 
 should have to think back sometime). I saw a case of con- 
 sumption in this State since I have been in practice, (I gradu- 
 ated in 1879). I think in 1880 an inbred Jersey heifer at 
 Allan's Corner ; had no connection with the farm. She was 
 got by her own full brother at the farm. 
 
 Q. Do you remember the Deering bull ? 
 
 A. What Deering bull ? 
 
 Q. A bull that was afflicted with tuberculosis ; one that Dr. 
 Salmon diagnosed. 
 
 A. At Rolfe's farm. Dr. Salmon was suspicious of a little 
 bull ; thought he had tuberculose tendencies. He thought he 
 had better be killed, and at Dr. Salmon's suggestion that bull 
 was killed, and his lung was sent to him at Washington for his 
 inspection. I do not know that that bull developed tuberculosis ; 
 he had glandular symptoms of tuberculosis. They were very 
 slight, and I don't know what his conclusion was ; he never 
 reported ; he made the suggestion that that bull had tuber- 
 culose tendencies. He thought we had better kill that little 
 bull. We did. That Jersey heifer? well, two cases, I don't 
 know whether that proved to be a case or not. Two cases 
 and the one at Waterboro' are the only ones I have had my 
 attention called to, either privately or publicly, in my State, 
 official or private practice. 
 
 Q. What was it you did with the cases at Waterboro'? 
 
 A. We found a very badly diseased cow ; I had her ex- 
 humed to show Mr. Gilbert the lung. It was thoroughly 
 diseased. She had a little wheezing calf up there two weeks 
 old, and I decided to kill it because it simply came out of that 
 cow. She also had two three-year-old heifers whose glands 
 
155 
 
 were affected ; we destroyed one of them. Two physicians 
 were there the day we killed her, and 1 showed them the con- 
 dition ; she had affection of the ghinds. 
 
 (l. What did you recommend Mr Scrihiier to do with his 
 cattle ? 
 
 A. Mr. Gilbert and 1 together reconnnended him to turn 
 them out to i^raze, and put them into quarantine for the sum- 
 mer. I visited them in the fall and found them fat, all of 
 them. I regarded them as being in a safe condition to sell 
 for beef at that time, and they were sold, I think. I didn't go 
 to the final disposition of the case. Mr. Bell and Mr. Gilbert 
 attended to it. I have their report ; that is all of it. 
 
 Q. What has been your view of the law under which you 
 have acted in taking these animals? 
 
 A. I am very glad to have the privilege of telling you, sir ; 
 and I never have consulted any attorney on it. But from 
 what I read, — section 50 of the law says, "The Governor may 
 when he deems it expedient, appoint commissioners, etc." 
 Section 51 also, (Witness here read section 51). 
 Q. Have you ever made any regulations? 
 A. We put several herds into quarantine. We have made 
 a great many regulations in the cases of the foot-and-mouth 
 disease. 
 
 Q. Have you understood your law applied to animals like 
 the Kent bull, that were apparently well on examination? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, I understand it gave us full power to take that 
 bull at any time we saw fit, if we deemed him to be a diseased 
 animal. 
 
 (^. Did you deem him to be a diseased animal? 
 A. I wrote to Mr. Gilbert what I found ; I stated it fairly 
 to him. I said "I found the bull apparently well," and re- 
 ported my visit to him. I then took pains to ascertain, as near 
 as I was able to find out, if he was from Princess Alba. I made 
 up my mind that if from that dam he ought to be killed and 
 never ought to serve a single cow. I believed I had ample 
 authority to act. 
 
156 
 
 Q. You stated last night with reference to the Kent bull 
 and the other hulls that were out, that you W(Uild have the 
 other l)ulls innnediately examined? 
 
 A. Yes, sir; I would have them examined. 
 
 Q. And you would take bulls that appeared diseased and 
 kill them ? 
 
 A. That would be my recommendation ; those that were 
 not diseased I would advise the owners to feed them for beef, 
 in the lirst instance, and if I was satisfied that they Avere dis- 
 eased in any way — if they had the slightest taint of disease 
 about them — I would have the full authority and justitication 
 of having them killed. 
 
 Q. You presupposed their disease. You are going out to 
 make an examination of those other bulls. Now, suppose 
 you find a bull that is apparently all right, what are you going 
 to do ? 
 
 A. I should not feel justified in killing that bull without 
 some other evidence than that. If that bull, mind you, was 
 out of a cow that I had seen the lungs of, and found them 
 thoroughly diseased, and I knew that bull was dropped since 
 that cow became in that condition, I should say, no matter 
 how well he appeared, off with his head. 
 
 Q. Do you know Princess Alba had that disease when she 
 had that bull? 
 
 A. I am as confident as you are that your name is Southard. 
 
 Q. How do you know ? 
 
 A. Because the lesions were so apparent, and they had 
 such solid adhesions — all solidly united together. Jersey 
 cows are predisposed to the disease^ do not think she could 
 have been in that condition, without its being an old chronic 
 case of long standing; she dropped her calf in June before, 
 and we killed her in March. Particularly predisposed to 
 this disease, she advanced very rapidly, more so than one that 
 was not predisposed to it, that would have the power of re- 
 sistance more than a weak animal. My recommendation has 
 been to Mr. Gilbert, to have those bulls inspected, and killed 
 
157 
 
 if necessary. Mr. Gilbert has a communication from me 
 containing that recommendation. 
 
 Q. Under your view of the hiw you thought it was per- 
 fectly competent for the Commissioners, if he appeared ap- 
 parently well, to seize him and have him appraised, and kill 
 him at the expense of the State? 
 
 A. I do now ; knowing all I have learned since I saw him 
 at Bucksport. The day I saw him at Bucksport I had no 
 knowledofe that he was even from one oi' the cows of Orono. 
 My view was if we found him diseased we had better take 
 him away. 
 
 Q. How did you find him? At that time you believed you 
 had no authority to kill him? 
 
 A. I did not feel justified that day to have that l)ull ap- 
 praised, and — 
 
 Q. That is not the answer. I want to know if you believed 
 at that time you had any authority to touch that bull. 
 
 A. If I believed he was diseased, I believe I had the full 
 authority to do it. I became satisfied afterwards. 
 
 Q. Now, did you or not, at the time you made that exam- 
 ination of the bull at Bucksport, either you or the Board of 
 Commissioners, have authority to take him and have him 
 appraised, and kill him? 
 
 A. I did not do it. 
 
 Q. Do you believe you could ? 
 
 A. Yes, sir ; I believe I could, if I believed he was diseased 
 in any particular. 
 
 Chair : — Do you believe you had authority, in the light 
 you had at that time, to take that i)ull and kill him [To Mr. 
 Southard] : — I want an answer to your question, and I 
 want the Doctor to stop then. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — I asked him if he believed the Commis- 
 sioners had authority, at the time he examined that bull at 
 Bucksport, and found him apparently well, to take that bull 
 and have him api)raised at the expense of the State. 
 
 Witness: — I think I will decline to answer it. M}' action 
 shows best what I thought ; I did not feel justified from what 
 
158 
 
 I saw down there in having him killed and appraised at the 
 State's expense. 
 
 Chair : — It is a fair qnestion. 
 
 Witness : — If I am obliged to answer it — I should hardly 
 think I did have the authority that day, knowing what I did 
 then about it. 
 
 Mr. Southard: — Mr. Gilbert was perfectly right at that 
 time? 
 
 Witness : — When he wrote me back in answer to my letter 
 that we had no proof he was from diseased parentage, and I 
 immediately forwarded Mr. Gowell's letters showing him the 
 dam was one of the worst cases at Orono, I thought Mr. 
 Gilbert, when he knew that fact, would say, "if that is the 
 case, I agree with you that we should dispose of him;" 
 but he didn't say anything of that kind. He then replied if 
 the bull was unsound it would oblige the College to refund. I 
 consulted him at once — as has been my custom always. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — You don't believe that the law authorized 
 you to kill all the animals. We have got two or three letters 
 from Dr. Bailey to read at this time regarding the law. There 
 is one dated Portland, Sept. 28th, 1886. This letter is to Mr. 
 Gilbert from Mr. Bailey. (The letter was read in evidence 
 and is as follows :) 
 
 Portland, Sept. 28th. 1S8G. 
 My Dear Sir : — I have heard nothing from you since you went to Water- 
 boro', but received a letter this noon from Chase, which is so different 
 from my supposed understandin<; with you, I write you at once. When T 
 last inspected Scribner's cattle, I told him, and afterwards told you, I 
 could see no reason why they were not lit for beef, when he replied that 
 no one won id give a cent a pound for them, and we then arranged that we 
 would get Deering to buy tliem, as he was not afraid of them, and tluis 
 end the whole controversy, and Scribner thus get more for his cattle /oj- 
 he«f than he could possibly get if they were condemned and destroyed as 
 sick cattle. Mr. Chase now writes me, "Mr. Gilbert came out here to see 
 the cattle Saturday. I was not here, but he told Mr. Scribner to sell his 
 cattle his first opportunity and said to him to have the cattle appraised and 
 whatever they sold under the appraisal, the State and town would make up 
 to him. The appraisers were there yesterday and prized the whole stock 
 $255.50. I think this is a little more than they will sell for, but not very 
 much. Mr. Harper Deering said to me he would come and see the cattle 
 
159 
 
 in a day or two, and I have no doubt Mr. Scribner will dispose of them 
 to him or some one else, in a few days. As soon as he sells them I will let 
 you know. J. H. C. 
 
 P. S. Mr. Deering left here about an hour before Gilbert came Sat- 
 urday, and he did «ot see him. Now, as I look at this arrangement, we 
 have had a lot of well cattle appraised, for which we have no * 'shadow of 
 law" for if well we had nothing on earth to do with them, while if ap- 
 praised at all, it could only be as sick ones, and for which no other price 
 could be realized by the owners. Now, Chase says he don't think they 
 will bring the appraisal and Scribner has the right to dispose of them to 
 Deering, or some one else, with all the prejtidice surrounding them, at any 
 price he likes, and the State makes good. 
 
 Why, if they are Jit for beef, as we have decided, what has the State to 
 
 do with them any way? Is this the way you understand it? If not, you 
 
 may have time now to complete our arrangement with Deering, and not 
 
 have the whole thing abort, but if Scribner and Chase understand it as 
 
 you do I am completely nonplussed. What is to be done about Govvell's 
 
 request to go to Orono? I am able to sit up a few hours a day, but it is 
 
 a great exertion to write anything, so please excuse my scribbling, as I am 
 
 anxious about the case. 
 
 Yours, Geo. H. Bailey. 
 
 Witness : — Scribner's cattle were diseased. Scribner is the 
 man who owned the cattle at North Waterboro' ; not con- 
 nected with the College herd at all. I swear by that letter 
 now, and I only wish I had the letter I received from Mr. 
 Gilbert in reply. I know the tenor of it very well. I dis- 
 agreed with him about the propriety of appraising animals after 
 we had lost control of them — after we had discharged them 
 from quarantine. I did not believe we had any right to have 
 them appraised at the State's expense. They were not ani- 
 mals that had tuberculosis ; they were animals that had been 
 exposed to it, and might have it in their systems at least. 
 
 The only calf that we killed at Scribner's was a little wheez- 
 ing calf. These other cattle were not from an}' cow that we 
 know had tuberculosis, we did not know that the dams were 
 unsound. 
 
 Q. There was a pretty good suspicion, was not there? 
 
 A. It proved not ; they recovered at pasture and got well. 
 The orround I took was we had nothing to do with having 
 them appraised after that ; they were virtually well animals ; 
 
160 
 
 we had pronounced them sound as far as discharghig them 
 from quarantine. 
 
 Q. When a creature was apparently well you had no right 
 to proceed against him ? 
 
 A. When we took our hands off them we had no control of 
 them at all. 
 
 Q. Did the Scribner cattle have this disease or not? 
 
 A. They had not ; no, sir. The two we killed had it hut 
 the rest of them didn't have it. They proved not to have it ; 
 after I put them into quarantine. They sold for beef. 
 
 Q. Did you examine them? 
 
 A. I did percuss the lungs of every one of tiiem. 
 
 Q. What was the conclusion with respect to them ? , 
 
 A, That they were fit to discharge. 
 
 Q. I mean at the time you examined them first? 
 
 A. There was one, — that Roan Heifer — at that time I re- 
 garded with suspicion, because she had enlargement of the 
 throat. Mr. Gilbert didn't like the appearance of the previ- 
 ous one. He says "let us recommend them to turn them out." 
 He regarded that they were going to be appraised too highl3^ 
 
 Q. You pronounced the case at that time to be tuberculosis, 
 did you not? 
 
 A. I did — the old cow — the calf on general principles. 
 
 Q. Did you act under the law at Orono? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. Wholly, did you not? 
 
 A. Wholly? No, sir; we put them into quarantine and 
 conformed to the law strictly in that respect. 
 
 Q. What authority Avas the slaughter of the herd conducted 
 under? 
 
 A. We did not conform to the law in anything of this — 
 
 Q. I want to know by what authority 3'ou took charge of 
 that herd at Orono ? 
 
 A. We were notified as Cattle Commissioners that there 
 was a disease in that herd. 
 
 Q. Was it by the authoritj'^ of the law or not ? 
 
161 
 
 A. I don't know wliat uiithority Mr. Gilbert had; I got 
 my authority Iroiii him to go Ihoro and act. 
 
 Q. How did you act? under the hiw, or not? 
 
 A. The lirst instance we put them into ([uarantine. 
 
 Q. And what did you do in the next instance? 
 
 A. Kept them in quarantine. 
 
 Q. Was that under the hiw or not? 
 
 A. You may regard it either way you like, I am not a 
 lawyer. 
 
 Q. You are a Commissioner? 
 
 A. I would rather be a good doctor than a poor hiwyer any 
 time. 1 don't know anything about the law. 
 
 Q. Don't you claim to know something about the law? 
 
 .V. I claim that that law reads so clearly to me that I 
 understand it. 
 
 Q. You may claim that you know the law. You claim that 
 action at Orono was under the law? 
 
 A. We may have departed from the law when we killed 
 those cattle, inasmuch as they had not been appraised. 
 
 Q. But that was the only thing? 
 
 A. I don't know as I can think of any little technicality 
 that we let go unobserved. 
 
 (Mr. Southard read a letter dated "Portland, Aug. 11th, 
 1886," as follows :) 
 
 Portland, Aug. 11th, 188G. 
 
 Dear Sir :— 1 went to North Waterboro* yesterday to see Scribner's cattle, 
 and they have much improved in every respect, so much so, that they are 
 each and all lit for beef in my opinion. Scribner scouts the idea, however, 
 and pays nobody will buy or eat them, etc. He talks like a fool, and says a 
 dozen lawyers have told him he had a right to have had his f-attle appraised 
 (all of them), when we killed the heifer, and Judge Tapley tells him that 
 one should have been appraised at her value irhen she loas loell. 
 
 His cows have gained much flesh since they have been turned out and 
 had something to eat. while the oxen are fat, and have gained four inches 
 each since we were there. 
 
 That '"bull calf"" at Uucksport, 1 have written Gowell about, and he tells 
 me he is out of Princess Alba, one of the two cows 1 ordered killed when 
 Mr. Oaks was there, and that proved one of the inorst cmscs on the farm. 
 
 11 
 
162 
 
 In view of this fact T have no doubt of the policy of having liim destroyed. 
 It was policy that govei'ncd our action at Orono, wiierever Ave were in 
 doubt, and this bull, if allowed to be used, mij^iit get a hundred calves 
 that would become predisposed to tuberculosis by heredity, Gertainl}^, 
 even if this animal remained for a time apparently free from the disease. 
 
 We certainly have thus far subjected ourselves to no criticism that 
 would re-act upon us with such force as this, and Justly too, if such a thing 
 took place, while in case of that cow at Bangor, that Michcner pronounced 
 sound, if covered hj a "sound bull" she might never produce a calf that 
 would prove to be infected. 
 
 Let me hear from you in regard to this matter, for I have promised Mr. 
 McAlister that I would take prompt action in this matter, while a "post- 
 mortem'" of this animal might prove of especial interest to us in regard 
 to our future action if the same emergency arises. I have no doubt Mr. 
 Hatch will endorse this action fully, when the matter is explained to liim, 
 in the absence of Gov. Robie. 
 
 Yours respectfully, 
 
 Geo. H. Bailey. 
 
 Q. Has it been ])olicy that has prompted you in roliirence 
 to the Kent bull, or the hiw? 
 
 A. I think it was mighty good policy to have him killed. 
 
 Q. Yes, sir; I want to know whether it is policy or law? 
 
 A. I am willing you should know just what the truth was 
 about the policy of killing the Orono herd now. There was 
 a good deal of talk at Orono among the Governor and Council 
 about the policy of killing that herd before we finally decided 
 whether they were all unsound or not. The proposition came 
 up, that nobody could tell. The question arose among the 
 State College trustees, and the Governor and Council, whether 
 it would be policy to kill that whole herd. I had several 
 talks with Mr. Gilbert about it. I told him I was in doubt 
 whether my profession would sustain me in allowing that 
 herd to be killed, and I wished to correspond with parties to 
 get their opinions. I corresponded with Dr. Liautard and 
 Dr. Salmon. When we came to kill the cattle the emergency 
 did not arise, for every one of them proved to be diseased ; 
 but the proposition came from the Governor and Council, 
 whether they were diseased or not they would stand behind 
 us ; they believed it policy to do so ; they did not know 
 
163 
 
 when it would be aafe to put in IVesh cuttle, or the milk 
 safe to use. So they said, "Let us kill them and wipe them 
 out." I wrote Dr. Salmon on that point. 
 
 (Letter dated at Washington, D. C'., April 8th, 1886, from 
 Dr. Salmon, was read by witness, as follows:) 
 
 Washin<;toii, D. C, April 8tli, 1886. 
 
 Dr. Geo. II. Bailey, 1 riue Street, Portland, Mo. : 
 
 Sir— 111 regard to the herd of cattle at Orono would say I cannot recom- 
 mend the slanjjhter of the animals that appear to be perfectly healthy ; 
 such may be, and may renuiin, perfectly free from the disease. My advice 
 would be to destroy all that show signs of disease, thoroughly disinfect 
 the stables and keep the balance under supervision. If there are no other 
 quarters in which to put the new herd, it seems to mc tiiat they, too. would 
 be open to suspicion because the stables and grounds must be infected with 
 the germ of tuberculosis. If the new cattle are to be put immediately 
 into the same stables and upon the same ground?, will they not too be- 
 come infected? If the council believe that, as a matter of policy, it is 
 better to kill the whole herd and start out with a new one, that is a ques- 
 tion of business and not a profession:iJ one. 1 do not see what I could say 
 more than this. I have given you advice from a professional standpoint 
 and cannot go beyond that and decide as to the best policy from a business 
 standpoint for the institution to adopt. 
 
 Very respectfully, 
 
 A. E. Salmon. 
 
 Mr. iSouthard : — That was before the slaughter. He says 
 in regard to the herd of cattle at Orono, "I would say I can- 
 not recommend the slaughter of the animals that appeared to 
 be perfectly healthy." He advised that those that appeared 
 to be perefctly healthy ought not to be killed. 
 
 Witness : — That was my proposition to President Fernald 
 the first time I ever talked with him. 
 
 Q. To kill those that proved to be diseased, and those that 
 bore suspicion to isolate them and keep them apart? 
 
 A. Yes, sir. 
 
 Q. AVhy did you insist that the Kent bull be appraised and 
 killed at the State's expense when he appeared perfectly 
 healthy ? 
 
 A. I say to you I did not foci justified at what I saw down 
 there, to have him appraised and killed at the expense of the 
 
164 
 
 State ; — I say that now, and I say that always. I told Mr. 
 Kent I did not feel justitied in having him killed at that time 
 — both him and Mr. McAlister. 
 
 (Letter of March 8th, 1886, was read by Mr. Southard as 
 
 follows :) 
 
 Portlaud, Mai-cli 8tb, 1886. 
 
 Gentlemen : — Since mj'^ arrival home yesterday morning, I have submit- 
 ted the specimen I took from the lung of Pet to several tests that seem 
 to my mind to conclusively confirm the diagnosis of tuberculosis, made 
 by me at Orono, and I am going to Boston this afternoon to consult a 
 member of my profession, in whom I have great confidence, as to the 
 future care and disposal of your herd. 
 
 While I am at a loss to account for the uniformity of symptoms exhibited 
 in so large a number ot animals as harmonizing witli the theory of phthisis, 
 my mind is still irresistibl}'' drawn to the conclusion, that if my diagnosis 
 in the case of Pet is correct, that all the preceding cases have been alike, 
 and that all of the present herd, that are in any way affected, all have 
 tuberculosis. Not that they are all affected at the present time, (but such 
 as are), and right here is where I expect to encounter my chief difliculty 
 where to draiv the line, and be able to say positively, what individual mem- 
 bers should be destroyed, what number be quarantined, and what propor- 
 tion of them are entirely above suspicion. Tlie ditiicultj^ experienced by 
 the most skillful veterinarians in the auscultation and percussion of the 
 lungs of bovines, in these cases, renders every precaution necessary to be 
 taken to avoid mistakes, and as this is a case of much importance to us 
 all, I shall endeavor to possess myself of the fullest information and ad- 
 vice befoi'e proceeding further. 
 
 . Not that I intend to shirk any part of my duty as Veterinary Officer of 
 the State, but first having conclusively proven my diagnosis correct, to 
 then proceed cautiously and humanely as possible in the work before us. 
 
 To this end, I ask for the fullest co-operation of your faculty, and for 
 closest observance of the symptoms of each and every member of the 
 lierd, between now and the time of my next visit of Friday of this week, 
 by which time we should be able to identify the disease in quite a number 
 of the animals, beyond any reasonable doubt, and also to regard as free 
 from suspicion, a certain number that during this time give no evidence of 
 disease. 
 
 Of course, if there are any members of the present herd, from the dams 
 of either of the cases killed, such as Pet or Betsey, they would become 
 "self condemned'" by direct hereditary tendency, while those calves vvhoare 
 from dams having no symptoms of disease could be safely retained. 
 
 While I have no doubt about condemning the milk of any animal af- 
 fected, there are considerations regarding the butter, about which we will 
 get more light before we meet again. In the meantime, believe me. 
 
 Yours sincerely, 
 
 Geo. H. Bailey, V. S. 
 
165 
 
 Witness: — That question arose, I consulted our authorities 
 on the subject. 
 
 Q. You believed that this Kent bull was a very dangerous 
 creature to l)e at large? 
 
 A. I think he was an unsafe creature, I regarded him so. 
 
 Q. You told he was a dangerous animal somewhere in your 
 testimony ? 
 
 A. I regarded him as an unsafe animal to })e at large. 
 
 Q. You believed it was the duty of the Commissioners 
 to immediately take that bull and have him taken care of? 
 
 A. Yes, I so advised after I found he came from Princess 
 Alba. I felt justified in doing it. Knowing that two other 
 calves from the same cow were also diseased and both killed, 
 — from Princess Alba — both were dropped before this bull 
 was, and they were both diseased. 
 
 Q. You believed that the duty of the Commissioners was 
 at once to take charge of that bull? 
 
 A. I wouldn't say as to that. 
 
 Q. You believed in doing it just as soon as you could? 
 
 A. I think it is always best to act, when we are satisfied 
 of the presence of the contagion, and talk afterwards. Your 
 Commissioners ought always to act promptly in such matters. 
 That is my belief about it. (Letter dated "Kennebunk, Apr. 
 10th," offered by Mr. Southard as evidence, and read, as fol- 
 lows :) 
 
 Kennebunk, April lOtli, 18SG. 
 
 Dear Gilbert : — I came out bere this morning at the request of the se- 
 lectmen, and have ridden all the forenoon to see four lots of sheep, all 
 badly diseased with scab. Two of these lots, fourteen in one, and six in 
 the other, were mere skeletons, and I have ordered them condoniMod and 
 buried. The other two lots I have instructed the owners how to proceed 
 to cure them and disinfect their premises, and have no doubt they can be 
 saved without any expense to the State. I have cautioned the selectmen 
 about an appraisal and they are to let me know all about it. I have also 
 received a very urgent call from the selectmen of Monson and have agreed 
 to go down there Monday, although I much dislike the trip, but don't see 
 any way to avoid it. I have also a letter from Wesley, which I will send 
 you when 1 get home, and from what they say I tliink tlicy must have a 
 case of gland<MS, but it is 24 miles from tl>e steamboat landing at Macbias- 
 port, and .j'l miles from any railrond ^^o I rhiiik we horror '-stavo them oft'' 
 
1G6 
 
 for awhile anyway. I have heard nothing yet from Sahiion or Liautartl 
 
 but am afi'aid thej^ maj^ think our proposed action too sweeping to be 
 
 fully justified, although I have no doubt of the policy of it from a "•monej' 
 
 point of view." Everything seems to "come in a heap" lately in the State's 
 
 business. 
 
 Yours trulj% 
 
 Geo. M. Bailey. V. S. 
 
 Witness : — What in that letter do you want to criticise? 
 
 Mr. SinUliard '.—What do you? 
 
 Witness : — I am at your service, if you have got any ques- 
 tion. 
 
 Q. What do you think of "staving" oft' a case of the gland- 
 ers ? 
 
 A. I communicated with parties (Wesley) and received a 
 letter from them that satisfied me that they didn't have it, 
 and consequently I didn't go, and they proved not to have it. 
 
 Q. You didn't have that letter at the time j'ou wrote this ? 
 
 A. No, sir ; I did not have the letter at the time I wrote 
 this. 
 
 Q. You stated that they had a case of the glanders ? 
 
 A. It was in the winter. I did not know whether they 
 had or not. 
 
 Q. What do you say in that letter? 
 
 A. If you will read me the passage you refer to — I am 
 glad to have you press this matter. 
 
 Ml'. Southard : — You say, "I have also a letter from Wes- 
 ley which I will send you when I get home and from what 
 they say they must have a case of glanders ; but it is twenty- 
 four miles from the steamboat landing, (M) — thirty-six miles 
 from any railroad, so I think we had better stave them 
 off" for awhile." Now, I would like to know — 
 
 Witness : — What is the date of that letter ? 
 
 Mr. Southard : — April 10th. I would like to know how 
 you reconcile "staving" oflf a case of the glanders when you 
 showed so much anxiety to get hold of this Kent bull? 
 
 Witness : — I am very glad you called my attention to it. 
 The first letter I got from those gentlemen gave me an im- 
 pression that they had a case of glanders down. I wrote them 
 
107 
 
 a set of questions, and I found it was a had trip to make ; and 
 I asked them to answer the questions I wrote them and I 
 would judge whether they had a case. The answer I got 
 satisfied me they were deceived themselves, and I didn't go, 
 and never heard about it from that day to this. 
 
 Q. ^Vnd at that time you were "staving" oif a case of the 
 ghmders, from all the evidence you had? 
 
 A. The first letter I got from them I judged they might 
 have a case of glanders. (Letter dated "Portland, Oct. 
 11th, 188G," read and introduced as evidence, as follows :) 
 
 Portland, Oct. llth, 188G. 
 l)o:\r Sir : — 1 liave sent you several communications which are unanswered 
 for the reason, as I suppose, that you have been away from home. I also 
 wrote Gov. Ifobie, a loeek ago, but have received no aii>iwer. and also 
 wrote Gov. Elect Bodwell, sending him some documents tliat were not in 
 his possession, by all o( which I suppose you will say I am getting anxious 
 about ''pleuro-pneumonia," and so lam. I sent you a slip this morning, that 
 3'ou may have seen. I also received this morning a letter from Mr. Kent 
 of r>uci<sport, complaining that nothing has been done in his case, and as 
 you are well aware that I do not feel at all satisfied myself as to the future 
 of that and some other cases connected with the College farm, I have 
 felt like leaving them to your disposal, as you are to remain upon the 
 Board in any event, while my commission and that of Ferguson will 
 expire with Governor Robie's term of oflice. I understand the Governor 
 and Council are to meet at Augusta, Wednesday, Oct. 14th, and as I think I 
 will be able to take a ride by that time, I will come to Augusta, if you 
 are to be there Wednesday, and see if something cannot be arranged for 
 our present and future protection, in case anything happens while I an» 
 still a mi'inbcr of the Board. Please let me know if you will l)e at Augusta. 
 
 And greatly oblige 
 
 Yours truh', 
 
 Geo. II. Bailey. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — With reference to the Waterhoro' cattle, 
 you recommended that they l)e fed off for beef? 
 
 A. I did, finally. 
 
 Q. Why didn't you make the same recommendation with 
 regard to the Kent l)ull ? 
 
 A. I did; I wrote Mr. Kent that I believed that the bull's 
 beef was safe to use, after seeing the lung. 
 
 Q. Why didn't you rectmimend it before you killed him? 
 
1G8 
 
 A. You couldn't feed him off to beef, after we killed him. 
 
 Q. Do you know what I mean by feeding a cow off to 
 beef? Don't be funny, because when you are funny you are 
 out of your element. 
 
 Witness : — Selling him for beef, I understand you. 
 
 Ml'.- /Southard : — I mean that he fattens him. 
 
 Witiiess : — I may have misunderstood you about it. I sup- 
 posed you said selling him for beef. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — We don't want any fun. 
 
 Witness : — We won't have any, I think. 
 
 Q. Did you use your influence to get him to feed that bull 
 off for beef? 
 
 A. I would say that I made the suggestion to him Upon it. 
 I am rather inclined to think I did. 
 
 Q. What did he say about it? 
 
 A. I can't tell you that. I won't say positively that I 
 advised him so to do. 
 
 Q. If he were killed at the expense of the State he would 
 be a dead loss? 
 
 A. Yes, sir, he would ; as a diseased animal. 
 
 Q. You would rather make him a dead loss to the State 
 than to have Mr. Kent feed him off for beef. 
 
 A. That would depend upon the developments ; — whether 
 he was fit for beef or not. (Letter dated "Portland, Apr. 
 8th, 1886," was read, as follows :) 
 
 Portland, April 8th, 1886. 
 
 Dear Gilbert : — I was expecting to go to Connecticut Monday morning, 
 but got word from Gov. Robie this morning that he liad a telegram from 
 Frj'^e, that the Department was to send some one from Xew York to in- 
 spect the cattle at Orono. So he thinks I had better not go, as I may be 
 needed here before I could well get back. 
 
 The Governor suggests that you go to Augusta, upon receipt of this 
 letter, and you will then be on the line, so he can telegraph you when we 
 start, and you go with us from there. 
 
 Whoever is coming may be here very soon, but if "Salmon could not 
 come I would rather not had anyone but have "gorn it alone."" 
 
 Yours truly, 
 
 Geo. H. Bailey. 
 
1G9 
 
 Chciir : — Let me ask a question : do you raise the issue 
 here that this matter of tuberculosis should not have been 
 looked into, and all infected cattle destroyed? 
 
 Mr. Southard: — Not at all. 
 
 Chair : — What is the issue you propose to raise? That is 
 what I want to get at so as to see the bearing of the examin- 
 ation. 
 
 Mr. Southard :— We do not believe that this herd during 
 the summer of 1885 was generally affected with that disease. 
 We do believe that in 1886, that winter, all the conditions 
 being favorable, and they being exposed to the cough of 
 Betsey and Pet, they took the disease at that time, and that 
 these bulls that have gone from the farm, and this Kent bull, 
 were all right ; and that this cow that has gone to Bangor 
 was all right. 
 
 Chair : — "The proof of the pudding is in the eating of it." 
 Do you raise the question that those bulls should not be ex- 
 amined ? 
 
 Mr. Southard :— Not at all ; but we do say, Mr. Walton, 
 that it is entirely unfair to the people of this State and its cattle 
 interests, to have this thing go out— that these bulls are dis- 
 eased. 
 
 Chair : — Is it not much better to have the idea go out that 
 those bulls may be diseased, than it is to undertake to prove 
 the fact that the whole State is diseased and that it is not 
 only in the College herd, but that it is scattered all over the 
 State ? 
 
 Mr. Southard : — Mr. Bailey has tried to make it appear — 
 I say Mr. Bailey and his cbunsel — that this State College at 
 Orono is the only thing that is spreading this disease over 
 the State. They spread that out here effectively. \Vc know 
 a sood deal better. It is not all down there ; it has not been 
 there generally amongst that herd, during all this time. 
 
 Chair: — I understand that is conceded— that there are 
 other cases in the State. The only object I have is that I 
 desire to know the point that you raise; because, of course, 
 we want to be able to apply the evidence as it comes along. 
 
170 
 
 Mr. Southard : — At present I believe that is not fair to 
 the owners of those bulls that have gone out, and the people 
 of the State of Maine. The report that the}' have tuberculosis 
 is unfounded. 
 
 Chair : — Would it not be a good plan to examine them and 
 see whether it is or not? What is the object of spending 
 two or three days here to prove the fact whether they have 
 got tuberculosis or not? 
 
 Mr. Southard : — How are you going to find out ? 
 
 Chair : — Go and see whether they have or not. 
 
 31r. Southard : — Are you going to kill them ? 
 
 Chair : — I don't know ; I am not going to. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — What is the issue now ? 
 
 Mr. Southard : — The issue is that that herd was not gener- 
 ally diseased during the summer of 1885 ; that those bulls are 
 not diseased in all probability to-day. The issue which has 
 been attempted to be made by certain persons here is the 
 issue of Mr. Gilbert's good faith; that is all. And we want 
 to show that his practice and what he has stood up to is 
 sanctioned by law, and by letters from standard veterinary 
 surgeons. It has been attempted to show that he did not do 
 his duty. 
 
 Chair : — If the trustees of the State College had been as 
 careful about obeying the law when they authorized a man to 
 buy stock as they were when that tuberculosis came out, I 
 do not believe there would have been all of this trouble. 
 They authorized a man to go out there to buy stock and start 
 in stock-raising — 
 
 Mr. Southard : — They took a part of the interest money 
 which they had a right to spend — no, they borrowed money. 
 
 (Jhair : — What is the difference whether they borrowed or 
 not? They furnished it to him in the first place. These 
 cattle, as I understand, were reckoned as State cattle. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — I want to say that Mr. Gilbert acted in 
 perfect good faith ; whatever he did was sanctioned by the 
 veterinary surgeons. It has been attempted by certain per- 
 sons to cast a reflection on Mr. Gilbert ; and the organ of 
 
171 
 
 this person, in to-day's issue, states it, in so many words, 
 that Mr. Gilbert has been sadly neirligent, and has been 
 guilty of a want of good faith. It seems very wrong. 
 (A letter from Dr. Michener was read, as follows :) 
 
 New York. Feb. 21st, 1SS7. 
 Z. A. Gilbert. Esq. 
 
 Dear Sir: — Owing to the fact that I have been moving the past week, 
 your letter is as yet unanswered. In my opinion your State acts very 
 wisely in ordering an examination of descendants of the College herd. 
 Tills should be a thorough examination— and in the event of finding any 
 such dosceiidants aftected with tuberculosis, the State could not possibly 
 do less than purchase and destroy such animals. 
 
 There is no reason for destroying the "entire herds'" in which maj'- be 
 found descendants of the College herd that are affected with the trouble, 
 as would be advisable in case contagious pleuro-pneumonia was the disease 
 in question, but oiil}^ to destroy those actually and unmistakably dis- 
 eased. It is only in a very few instances that such action as was taken at 
 Orono is to be sanctioned and sustained. I am surprised that any should 
 recommend the destruction of off-spring from the College herd that are 
 "sound and well and always have been." Such animals should not bo 
 destroyed — but all such should be examined by competent antlioritios to 
 ascertain if in fact they are "sound and well." You v:eU know it won't do 
 to judge by external appearances, etc. 
 
 In my hurry this morning I may not have answered j'our (jiioiies fully, 
 
 in which event please write me again and I trust then to have more time 
 
 to give you. 
 
 Sincerely yours, 
 
 Ch. P.. :\[ichener, V. S., 
 
 177'J Broadway, 
 
 New York. 
 
 Wiinesa : — I believe in that; I have always agreed with 
 Ibis letter. 
 
 (A letter from Dr. Salmon was read, as follows :) 
 
 Dr. G. H. Tiailcy, 
 
 1 Pine Street, 
 
 Portland, Me, 
 
 Dear Doctor: — In reply to 5'our favor of the 21st instant, asking for 
 reconimeiidations in regard to the action that should bo adojitod witii tlio 
 outbreak of tuboroiilosis at Orono, I would give it briolly as my oi)liii<ui : 
 1st, that all animals whi(!li show clear evidence of tuberculosis should be 
 slaughtered at once. 2nd, that those in regard to which there is reason 
 for doubt should be placed by themselves and carefully isolated, and that 
 
172 
 
 constant disinfection should be kept up in their stable. 3i-d, that those 
 which to all appearances are well should be placed, if possible, in a new 
 stable or on a piece of ground to which the affected animals have not had 
 access, and should be kept under careful supervision. Any Hew cases 
 which should develop among these should be removed as soon as possible. 
 Of course, the stable where the diseased animals have been should be 
 cleaned and disinfected in the most thorough manner and no animals allow- 
 ed in it for a considerable time. 
 
 You will notice that my recommendations are such as would be made 
 for any virulent contagious disease of slow incubation and in which the 
 virus has considerable power of resistance to external conditions. My 
 belief is that the more we cut loose from old ideas of tuberculosis being 
 a hereditary disease, and the more we treat it as a contagious plague the 
 more successful will be our eflbrts to control it. 
 
 Trusting that these suggestions will prove satisfactory, I am. 
 
 Very respectfully, 
 
 D. E. Salmon, 
 
 Chief of Bureau. 
 
 Witness : — Nobody would argue from that, that the disease 
 is not hereditary. 
 
 31r. /Southard : — Not at all. 
 
 (Letter dated "Portland, March 21st, 1880," was read, as 
 follows :) 
 
 Portland, March 21st, 18SG. 
 
 My Dear Sir: — Enclosed find Salmon's letter, by which you will see he 
 declines the invitation to come to Maine. I have written hiui upon re- 
 ceipt of his decision, full particulars of the outbreak and present appear- 
 ance and condition of the herd. 
 
 Now what do you propose? If we are to go there to exterminate all 
 animals that present lesions of the disease, it is going to be a very nice 
 distinction to make in some of those cases, and I much regret Salmon's 
 decision, as I shall approach a decision in some of these cases with much 
 reluctance, if obliired to do so single handed. As soon as I hear from 
 Salmon again I will let you know. 
 
 Yours trul}', 
 
 Geo. H. Bailey. 
 
 3Ir. /Southar'd : — It says it never was the intention of any 
 one to kill apparently well animals. 
 
 Mr. Cornish : — Don't argue the case now. 
 
 (Letter dated "Portland, Oct. 16th, 1886," was read, and 
 also a postal card from Mr. Bailey to Mr. Gilbert, as follows :) 
 
173 
 
 Portland. Oct. 16th, 188«. 
 Dear Sir:— I am just in receipt of your letter of tiie IStli, saying you 
 shall call "all the board'' together on Wednesday evening at City Hotel. 
 We have been struggling along for a year past with an indefinite iiunihcr. 
 but I found out one thing by going to AtTgusta, and tliat was, that both 
 Ferguson and myself wcj-c not mcmhers, our coniniissions having both ex- 
 pired Sep. 22nd, and 1 had to be reappointed Wednesday evening, in order 
 to linish up the business of the year, which I hope to do with a "clean 
 bill of health.'- You can sec therefore it will be of no use to notify Mr. 
 Ferguson, tor he is no longer a "member of the board." Not knowing 
 that you were aware of the fact, I write at once to inform you. 
 
 Yours truly, 
 
 Geo. H. liailey, V. S. 
 
 Portland. Oct. 2fith, 1886. 
 Dear Sir:— lie kind enough to give me your answer to the proposition 
 in regard to Kent's case, and also other items in my letter of the 23rd. 
 Mr. Kent is anxious to have the case disposed of, so :Mr. McAlistcr writes. 
 
 Y"ours truly, 
 
 Geo. H. Bailey, V. 8. 
 
 Q. I want to know if you did, as a matter of fact, see any 
 position to cover up or conceal anything down there? 
 
 A. I never have seen a single thing on the part of any of 
 the trustees. 
 
 Q. Has not Mr. Gilbert given you all the facts you have 
 asked for ? 
 
 A. No, sir, he has not. 
 
 Q. He is one of the trustees ? 
 
 A. He is one of the Cattle Commissioners also. You 
 called my attention, very pointedly, to that case of glanders 
 where you criticised my action in "staving it off." 
 
 Mr. Southard: — I don't criticise your action. Doctor, in 
 staving it off, at all. liut I want to know why you should 
 appear to be so very anxious to get at this Kent bull, and at 
 the same time neglect a case of the glanders? 
 
 A. I investigated that case of glanders and found it was 
 not a case, in my opinion. It was a long route ; an expen- 
 sive one to the State ; it proved eventually that I was right. 
 They wrote me they didn't have a case. On the subject of 
 jjlanders I want to read another letter I have — forwarded to 
 
174 
 
 me by Mr Gilbert. "Some time in June there was a case of 
 glanders reported at Patten. It was a long route," etc. 
 Upon the back of the letter I received from Mr. Gilbert I 
 received an indorsement of his opinion. I found a red hot case 
 of glanders in the public stable at the hotel, in Patten. Here 
 is what Mr. Gill)crt says upon the back of the letter : "the fore- 
 iroinof was received after the other letters. I don't believe 
 there is any glanders there. We don't want to incur the ex- 
 pense of a trip down there on a probable fool's errand. I 
 have a pile of letters notifying me of cattle diseases ; l)ut am 
 staving them off for the cattle to get well." I want to know 
 what you have to say to our Cattle Commissioners "staving 
 off" a pile of letters, from the municipal ofKcers, to allow the 
 cattle to get Avell. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — I have only to say that I didn't criticise 
 your action because you staved — 
 
 Witness : — You don't now, because, in doing that you 
 would have to criticise your client. I didn't know anything 
 about your client. I told you honestly. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — I told you honestly. 
 
 Witness : — I investigated the case ; it proved not to be a 
 case of glanders. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — Here is one case where you are very 
 anxious, another where you are staving it off. 
 
 Witness : — I am very anxious when I think my duties lead 
 me in that direction. 
 
 (Letter dated "Portland, August 8th," was read in evidence 
 as follows :) 
 
 Portland, Aug. Stli, 1SS6. 
 Dear Gilbert ; — I enclose to you some doeunients that I deemed of suffi- 
 cient importance to receive my prompt attendance, and went to Bucks- 
 port on Wednesday, and met Mr. McAlister, who took me to Mr. Kent's 
 place. The latter is a farmer with a large stock of cows, from which he 
 supplies the city with milk, and he also keeps a bull for public service. 
 
 This bull he i)nrcliased at Orono, and he is apparently a well animal, 
 with a normal temperature and sound lungs as far as can be tested by 
 percussion, and is about a year old. 
 
 He has covered but one cow, and was estopped from farther use of liim 
 by orders of Mr. McAlister, until my inspection of the animal. 
 
175 
 
 Mr. Kent is a slircwd old luaii who has carefully read Micheiier's report, 
 and has it all by heart, especially where he expresses the opinion that no 
 calf from one of those tuberculosed cows at Oroiio would ever arrive at 
 maturity free from the disease. He also tells me he has a letter from yon. 
 advisih";- him to use that bull for public service. 
 
 Now, the bull having come from one of tiie cows wc killed, at the Col. 
 lege farm, 1 can hardly see my way clear to concur in that advice, but I 
 have promised Mr. Kent that I would correspond with you at once, and 
 let him know our decision. I called to see Mr. Hatch at liangor. and 
 found him at the C\)nnty Convention, trying to get nominated for Senator, 
 sol could not get his ear. What shall wcdoi' i'lcase return the cor- 
 respondence. 
 
 Yours, 
 
 CIco. 11. Bailey. 
 
 Q. You had a conversation with Mr. Gilbert subsequently 
 to your going to Bucksport? 
 
 A. Not in relation to the Kent bull. The lirst notice I 
 ever got was from Mr. McAlister — selectman of the town — 
 ordering me to go there. I wrote Mr. Gilbert and corres- 
 ponded with him afterwards, not before. 
 
 (^. Did you have a conversation respecting your visit down 
 there ? 
 
 A. I may have had some time since that ; I don't know 
 when. I don't know how late after that. 
 
 Q. You never understood him to criticise your action in 
 answering the request of the Selectmen? 
 
 A. He says in the other letter he wrote me he didn't thiidv 
 it warranted a visit or taking action in it. 
 
 Q. Did not you have a conversation afterwards in which he 
 said he did not find an}' fault with you, personally? 
 
 A. I was taken sick afterwards ; I won't say that we did 
 not ; we had some talk before that. 
 
 Q. Just tell what Mr. Gilbert concealed from you? 
 
 A. I say that I do not think that he has treated me (piite 
 so fairly as I have him. I think those cases reported to him 
 — he should have notified me about them. I think "staving 
 them oft'" to allow the cattle to get well was the height of in- 
 discretion. If those cattle had pleuro-pneumonia, or the 
 foot-and-mouth disease, in twenty-four hours it would have 
 
176 
 
 gone over the Stale. I didn't "stave off" this case of glanders. 
 I investigated to see whether it was a case of glanders or not ; 
 I did not propose to oMer this letter unless you pressed nie so 
 hard as you did about the other matter. 
 
 (Letters dated Bucksport, Sept. 18, 1886, and Portland, Oct. 
 7th, 1886, were read, and are as follows:) 
 
 Bncksport, Sep. IS, 1886. 
 Z. A. Gilbert, Esii. 
 
 Dear Sir: — Mr. Kent of tliis town has a bull he i)urchasecl at the State 
 College farm and he has been kept away from his other eattle lor some 
 time since last March. Dr. Bailey was in our town and looked the bull 
 over and was to have the matter settled, what was to be done with the 
 bull. I enclosed a letter from his wife which explains itself. As Mr. 
 Kent is kecpnig the animal up at some considerable expense I hope the 
 case will be disposed of one way or the other. 
 
 The people in this section feel that the bull ought not to be used owing 
 to the fact that all of the cattle on the farm at the State College were 
 killed, and as this creature was raised from one of the cows that were 
 killed, and also the bull, and the Commissioners made such a report 
 alter giving the subject careful consideration, it seems but justice that the 
 bull sold to Mr. Kent hy the State ought to be treated the same and killed 
 and not wait until the disease is transmitted to other cattle and then have 
 him and the whole herd killed I pr.esume you have had the matter care- 
 fully considered, and will you please advise at to the result. 
 
 Respct. yours, 
 
 G. W, McAlister. 
 
 Chair. Selectmen. 
 
 Portland, Oct. 7th, 1886. 
 My Dear Sir: — In view of the near approach of your assuming the 
 office of Governor of Maine, together with your well recognized leader- 
 shi]) in evcrj^thing pertaining to our cattle interests, will I trust be 
 deemed sufficient excuse for my intrusion upon your notice at this time, 
 of the constant danger by which we are menaced, in consequence of the 
 recent importations and outbreaks of pleuro-pneuinonia at Quebec, and 
 throughout the West, and of which I entertain a most serious apprehen- 
 sion. The State Authorities ot Massachusetts are moving promptly in 
 the matters, and I enclose to you a cut from this morning's paper, re- 
 lating thereto. I also enclose notice of the disappearance of l'.50 head 
 last Sunday at Chicago. I also send you the October number of the 
 American Veterinary Keview, Page 311, with the request that you forward 
 the paper to Hon. Z. A. Gilbert, at North Gi'eene. as soon as you have 
 read it. 
 
I 
 
 177 
 
 You are no dotibt aware of the recent prompt disposal by the Canadian 
 Anthorities of a valuable herd of Hereford and Angus cattle at Quebec, 
 but I have in formation that two herds of cattle who have been in the im- 
 mediate neighborliood of tiiese infected cattle, were allowed to be taken 
 to the Ohio State Fair, where they were advertised Ia«t weelv to be sold 
 at auction upon the Fair Grounds, but the permission to stdl w.i« with- 
 drawn, as soon as the managers learned of the outbreak at Qufbcr. There 
 are also some remnants of tuberculosis, in connection witii the College 
 herd at Orono, which in ni}' opinion should b<! promptl}' disposed of, and 
 to wliieh I have earnestly called the attention of Governor Hobie and his 
 Council, but which for some reason do not seem to receive their co-opera- 
 tion and support. The Attorney General of Massachusetts has decided 
 that the Cattle Commissioners cannot act separately in these matters, and 
 there are other cases recently called to my attention, but which I cannot 
 well communicate in this letter. I hope to receive your co-operation and 
 aid in the enforcement of what little law we have, a subject I deem of vast 
 importance to us all. While I remain. 
 
 Sincerely yours. 
 
 Geo. H. Bailey, V. S. 
 Hon. J. K. Bodwell. 
 
 Chairman : — Is there any other gentleman present who 
 desires to ask the doctor any question? This is a public hear- 
 ing and if any gentleman desires to ask any questions for in- 
 formation he is at libert}^ to do so. 
 
 President Fernald said that he knew Dr. Bailey had man- 
 aged the case very judiciously, carefully and wisely. 
 
 Mr, Southard : — He had the co-operation of the trustees 
 and of the Governor and Council. 
 
 Chairman : — The doctor evidently understands that he had 
 the co-operation of the trustees, and he has distinctly .stated 
 that with one exception he had no fault to find with them 
 whatever. Am I right? 
 
 Dr. Baileij : — That is true, sir. 
 
 Q. I would like to know if at the time that herd of cattle 
 was killed at Orono you found anything kept back by Mr. 
 Gilbert whatever? 
 
 A. No, sir; he acted with the fullest and most hearty co- 
 operation. He never failed to give me all the facts up to the 
 time of the Kent bull. We have acted harmoniously in every 
 instance until we came to that, I except the case of the Kent 
 bull. 12 
 
178 
 
 TESTIMONY OF M. C. FERNALD. 
 
 Q. Has the milk from the College herd been used in the 
 families and boarding-houses on the College farm prior to the 
 herd being destroyed ? 
 
 A. The milk was not used at the boarding-houses ; it was 
 used in Mr. Gowell's family and supplied to one or two fam- 
 ilies on the farm. The janitor got his milk there and I think 
 the assistant farm superintendent had his milk from the farm ; 
 but the other families had not had the milk from the College 
 farm for three or four years. When Mr. Rich was there the 
 milk was supplied to the boarding-houses and to the families 
 on the College premises, but since Mr. Gowell has had charge 
 that has not been the case. It was not used after the nature 
 of the disease was suspected, so far as I know. The use of 
 the milk before the disease was detected had no bad effect 
 upon the persons using it that I ever learned. After it was 
 known that there was trouble in the herd the use of it was 
 abandoned. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF MR. GOWELL. 
 
 There was a family of small children at the janitor's and 
 also at a farm hand's. The milk was used up to the 
 time of the notification of the Cattle Commissioners, March 
 5th. Children and adults used the milk up to that time. 
 Quite young children used of the milk. I have not heard of 
 their being sick from it. After the herd was declared dis- 
 eased, I gave the milk from the better animals to the pigs and 
 that from the poorer ones we threw away. We never dis- 
 covered there was any difficulty arising from its use, and dur- 
 ing all the years past raw skim milk had been used as pig 
 feed. At first it was told by the man who slaughtered the 
 hoffs that there was trouble with them, and that statement 
 went out. I went to him. I think I went to him after the 
 slaughter of the cattle, relative to it. He said our hogs were 
 not different from those that he bought from other parties. So 
 there was no foundation for the statement. For the first two 
 
179 
 
 or three years President Fernald's family was supplied with 
 butter from the milk. During '85 up to January first from 
 sixty to seventy pounds of butter a week were made on the 
 place. That was mostly disposed of in Bangor. Sales of 
 butter were made up to the time of notice to the Commis- 
 sioners, when our suspicions were aroused. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF HALL C. BURLEIGH. 
 
 Chairman: — Have you any knowledge, Mr. Burleigh, in 
 relation to the facts that we are required to examine into? 
 
 Mr. Burleigh ; — I do not know that I can throw any light 
 on what has already been said. It would be merely taking 
 up time. I was there when the killing occurred and I looked 
 at all there were of them. Those in the south end I should 
 think were the. worst. I did not sec those in the other (!iid 
 killed, but came home. I should disagree as to the appear- 
 ance of the cattle in the barns. I saw them when the Com- 
 missioners were first called. I think I could not have stayed 
 in that barn long without discovering disease there. 
 
 Chairman : — How would you have discovered it? 
 
 Mr. Burleigh : — The first thing that would have attracted 
 my attention would have been the manure that was behind 
 the cattle. That is something I always watch very closely. 
 The dropping was very dry and appeared like that of cattle 
 having a fever. Their condition was very good for a dairy 
 herd of cattle. I went into the I)arn in the morning. I think 
 Mr. Gowell went u^) with me fii the forenoon. In the after- 
 noon I noticed labor in the breathing and a certain uneasiness 
 among some of the cattle, and my impression is now there 
 were some of them that had not been considered aflfected. 
 They were in the new barn. Some of them seemed to be 
 laboring very hard and breathing as you will often see them 
 when they are hurried up hill, or something of that kind. I 
 went into the cellar and saw the same state of things in regard 
 to the dropping from the cattle — very dry. 
 
 Chairman : — Didn't a good many of these animals look as 
 though they were good for beef? 
 
180 
 
 Mr. Burleigh : — There was one steer that was killed whose 
 meat looked very nice indeed, and if he had not been in that 
 herd, if I had seen him killed on another farm, I should not 
 have hesitated to eat it. He did not appear to have so much 
 about his lungs as the others. Two steers were killed while 
 I was there. The other steer was very much more diseased. 
 One was what we consider a very pretty carcass of beef. 
 
 Cliairman: — Was it your judgment to kill those cattle? 
 
 Mr. Burleigh: — Yes, sir, by all means. I should have 
 thought the Commissioners, Governor Robie and the whole 
 concern that had anything to do with it very remiss in their 
 duty if they had not killed them. I had heard about this 
 disease before, but never saw a case of it that I know of. 
 This stock was mostly Jersey and some Shorthorns. A Short- 
 horn is what we sometimes call a Durham. I did not notice 
 any Herefords there. I think there was abundant law to take 
 up those bulls and either quarantine or destroy them, as the 
 Commissioners thought fit to do. 
 
 TESTIMONY OF MR. GOWELL resumed. 
 
 The Jersey Lily did not have a "bad cough" at the time she 
 died. Her lungs were not examined at all. That heifer and 
 Brownie were not examined. The only two that were ex- 
 amined were the two cows that were slaughtered in the spring 
 of '86. 
 
 Dr. Bailey : — If you had been present you would have 
 noticed that I had made the modification. He told me after- 
 wards there was a mistake about it. I admitted he was more 
 likely to be right than I. The impression has gone out here, 
 and it has been general I3' entertained for a day or two, that I 
 did not recognize that disease and did not know it until after 
 I had gone into the field and seen the lung of that cow. Prof. 
 Balentine, will you please state whether that is true or not? 
 I merely ask you to state such facts as you know yourself. 
 
 Prof. Balentine : — I will say from remembrance that the 
 first that I heard. Dr. Bailey said he was sure the disease was 
 
181 
 
 tuberculosis, and I am satisrtcMl from what had been told him 
 that he knew what the disease was before he went into the 
 field at all. The tirst that he said, that I heard, was after he 
 came back from the field. He had not made a thorough ex- 
 amination of the herd at the time he went into the field. As 
 my remembrance of it is, he had examined the Princess Alba 
 on one side and had supposed that he would not find her dis- 
 eased. That was on the right side. When she was slaugh- 
 tered that lung proved to be sound. When he came back I 
 asked him to examine the cow again, and he did so on the left 
 side, and as soon as he commenced on her he said, "There is 
 trouble here," and I am thoroughly satisfied that Dr. Bailey 
 understood what he was about there. 
 
 Mr. Southard : — You say the right lung was practically 
 unafiected. 
 
 Dr. Bailey : — I think he has got that reversed. 
 
 Prof. Balentine: — One of the lungs was free when she was 
 slaughtered. No one in my hearing at the first examination 
 questioned Dr. Bailey's professional skill in determining the 
 character of that disease, at the first examination. 
 
 (The following papers and correspondence were identified, 
 and read in evidence.) 
 
 Maink Coli.k<;k Farm. 
 
 Superiiitt'udeiit's Office. > 
 
 Oroiio. Me., Sept.. 7. 1885. ) 
 
 Mr. Kent: 
 
 Dear Sir: — 1 will ship the calf by railroad Wednesday forenoon and he 
 will probably arrive at your station towards niojht. same day. 
 
 Payment received in full. 
 
 The sire of this calf is 'Hjinx of Cream Brook," registered in the ''A. 
 J. C. Club." 
 
 His dam is the cow ''Princess Alba" registered in the "M. S. J. C. 
 Association." 
 
 I should like to hear how you are pleased with liim when you receive 
 him. 
 
 Respectfully, 
 
 G. M. Gowell. 
 
 Supt. 
 
182 
 
 (Affidavit of Seth W. Kent.) 
 
 To whom it may concern : This is to certify that I purchased of Mr. G. 
 M. Gowell, Supt. of the College farm, one bull calf on or about Sept. 7, 
 1885, and during the month of March my attention was called to the dis- 
 ease among the cattle at said farm and also the action taken to destroy 
 said herd. I being anxious in reference to my own herd of cattle, having 
 some 20 cows and was trying to improve the stock, I wrote Mr. Gilbert, 
 Sec. of the Board, asking his advice as to using the bull for stock pur- 
 poses, (as the sire was Ginx Cream Brook, registered in the "A. J. C. 
 Club," and the dam is the cow Princess Alba, registered in the M. S. J. 
 C. Association, and we^e both killed.) I was very anxious to have good 
 authority as to using him. Mr. Gilbert wrote me advising me to keep 
 the bull and use him. I called the attention of the Selectmen of the 
 town of Bucksport to the matter, being very anxious as to the future of 
 my herd, and they were very much opposed to his being used. This was 
 some time in May, 1886. In July, 1886, I gave the municipal officers of 
 Bucksport a written notice that I had good reason to believe that I had a 
 diseased animal in my herd, and soon after Dr. Bailey, in companj'^ with 
 the municipal officers, visited my place, and made an examination of the 
 bull, and while he would not pronounce him diseased he was much 
 opposed to his being used; and after some correspondence with Dr. 
 Bailey the bull was killed and the lungs sent to Portland to Dr. Bailey, 
 he sending me twenty dollars to aid in getting him out of the way and 
 having him killed. 
 
 Mr. Ferguson visited my place and he advised the killing of the bull 
 and not to be used for stock purposes. 
 
 Bucksport, Feb. 1st, 1887. 
 
 Seth N. Kent. 
 
 I certify that as far as I have had anything to do with the aforesaid 
 animal, the foregoing statement is true. 
 
 G. W. McAlister, 
 
 Chair. Selectmen. 
 
 U. S. Department of Agriculture, 
 Bureau of Animal Industry. 
 
 Washington, D. C, March 18th, 1886. 
 Hon. M. C. Fernald, 
 
 Pres. Me. St. College, 
 
 Orono, Maine. 
 
 Sir: Your letter of the 12th instant to the Commissioner of Agriculture 
 has been referred to me for reply. I should be very glad to give you any 
 assistance in my power but find it impossible to leave Washington during 
 this season of the year. I have no doubt that Dr. Bailey's diagnosis is 
 correct and I think lie will be able to give you all the professional advice 
 that is necessary. 
 
183 
 
 I should advise you to have all animals slaughtered that show symptoms 
 of the disease and to move the others to a different stable, if possible, in 
 any case to have the stable in which the animals have been standing 
 thoroughly cleaned and disinfected. 
 
 Very respectfully, 
 
 D. E. Salmon. 
 
 Chief of Bureau. 
 
 Oldtown, Me., March 2d, 1887. 
 
 The cow recently killed by W. C. Miller of Bangor, the lungs of which 
 were sent to Augusta, was bred by me and sold to the said Miller two years 
 ago. 6he was from a cow which I bought of Michael Hanson, then of 
 Palmyra. The bull that sired this cow killed by Mi*. Miller was bred by 
 Benj. Stevens of Stetson, and sold to Wm. Snnirt of Tarkman. This dis- 
 eased cow was in no way connected to Dr. North's herd as has been 
 
 erroneously stated. 
 
 Sanford Stevens. 
 
 Portland, Aug. 2, '86. 
 
 Dear Gilbert : Yours of yesterday received. Of course I went to Orono. 
 just as I wrote you last Sunday, (and I knew you had not received my 
 letter when you wrote), so not hearing from you to the confrnry T wonr 
 way down iIu-M' MomL.y alti-rnooi., iiinl uul lu Oro.io in the i-aiii on Tues- 
 day morning to find myself April fooled. I wrote you I had notified 
 Gowell. and he was looking for us both. 
 
 I hate to go right back, but T suppose we might as well attend to what 
 we have to now as anytime, but I can hardly see any need of notifying 
 Ferguson, as he went there last week on his "own hook" and staid two 
 days, but Gowell says he cannot see what for I I have a lei tei- from Salmon 
 giving me his recommendations in full, and the only thing he suggests 
 different from what I proposed to do at our first meeting, is in regard to 
 disinfection of the stables. So I can hurdly see why we n.-cd him. Of 
 course we shall be criticised. We were in the ''foot-and-mouth"" cases, if 
 you recoUect, but we made out to live through it, and in the present case, 
 I am ready to take action now, as I shall ever be, and as willing. I have 
 written nothing more for the Home Farm, and am not liable to say any- 
 thing of which you will not fully approve. I have written tlie selectmen 
 of Wesley for full particulars of their case, and when I hear from them 
 will decide what to do. I shall leave here Monday noon for Orono. 
 
 Geo. H. Bailey. 
 
 Portland. April l.")th, '86. 
 Dear Gilbert: 
 
 We waited for you all tiie lorenoon yesterday, and not until afternoon 
 did I get your letter. Governor Robie still thinks he can get Salmon here 
 and I prepared a request for him to come, which is to be forwarded to 
 
184 
 
 Frye. All agiHC that we should be criticised if we should recommend the 
 indiscriminate slaughter of the herd. As soon as Salmon is heard from I 
 will notify you, but answer please before three days. Shall you be in Au- 
 gusta the 27th, when the Council meets? 
 
 Yours truly, 
 
 Geo. H. Bailey. 
 
 Portland, 12th, 1886. 
 
 Dear Sir: I am in receipt of your letter of the 18th, probably written 
 before you received mj'^ second letter written yesterday, or you certainly 
 would not say to me as you do that '"we have no evidence that this bull 
 came from any other than sound parentage" as I enclose you Mr. GoweWs 
 letter in reply to min§ asking what cow was the dam of the young bull at 
 Bucksport. After reading my letter of the 11th if you still adhere to the 
 same opinion I shall abide by it for the present, but I know it will not 
 satisfy the selectmen of Bucksport of whom Mr. McAlister seems to be a 
 very intelligent man, and fully disposed to press this case to a satisfac- 
 tory conclusion. As to their call on me to attend this case. If ''you do 
 not think it warranted a visit from me" how am I to distinguish between 
 what I ought to attend and those I had not? For I have never received a 
 call apparently more in earnest than this one, and one in which I felt my- 
 self it was my duty to attend when I came to know the calf was from the 
 herd at Orono. 
 
 His dam now proves to have been "Princess Alba" one of the worst, if 
 not the ver}' worst case at Orono, and her lungs presented all the lesions 
 possible for tuberculosis to assume. This was the case Balentine told you 
 I called a "beautiful case." I think now it is important that we agree 
 upon some action to be taken, although if you still adhere to your present 
 position, I can not now see my way clear to do so, but am willing to 
 allow the matter to lie for the present or lay it before the Council for their 
 opinion if you think well of so doing. 
 
 We have so far encountered no criticism in our management of the 
 Commission we cannot successfully defend, and as my term of office will 
 probably expire with Governor Robie's "term of office" I would not like 
 to make a mistake now. 
 
 I am yours sincerely, 
 
 Geo. H. Bailey. 
 
 Portland, Oct. 29th, 188*3. 
 Dear Sir: I am in receipt of yours of the 27th, containing four letters. 
 three of which were from Etna and one from Kennebunkport, neither of 
 which were sent for by me as they relate to matters which have been long 
 since settled. If you will refer to my letter again you will notice that I 
 specified three letters, the first from Scribner (which you asked to keep a 
 little longer) the next from Mr. Gowell in relation to Kent's bull, and a 
 postal from Mr. Chase. These are a part of my records, and may be of 
 
185 
 
 service to uio. Mr. Kell did (■iiU on iiic on 'rucjiday. juid I sliowed iiiiii 
 McAlister's letter, and vvliilo lie full}- ufjrced wilh me that tlio proposition 
 was a liberal one on Mr. Kent".* part, and ought to hr srttlfd, wo were not 
 at all sure we had a ••quoriun of the board" as, if Mr. Ferguson is a mem- 
 ber as he says he is (Governor Robie having continued his commission), 
 we conid not be certain whether he wonld concur with your views or 
 ours, upon a final vote, although he said to me informally he thougiit 
 every one of the young bulls should be kilh'd or ciistrated. Consequently 
 no action was taken officially, but another letter from Mr. Kent, request- 
 ing immediate action on his case, precipitated action upon ray part, and 
 rather than Iiave any more disagreement or vexation about this case (and 
 yon still opposing any compromise whatever), I concluded to offer to Mr. 
 McAlister to settle the matter upon mj' own privntc account, and am just 
 in receipt of his letter of acceptance of my offer, an<l the bull will be 
 killed at once. This action upon my part will in no way compiomise the 
 Commissioners, or commit them to any future action in regard to other 
 cases that may arise similar to Mr. Kent's, after I am no longer a Com- 
 missioner. The cost of settling the matter as I have I shall regard of no 
 consequence to me, compared to the result that will be attained, and I 
 shall feel that I have discharged xwy duty, in the only case connected with 
 the College farm that I have been allowed to know anything about. I 
 can see no good to be accomplished by going over the ground, as regards 
 our difference of opinion upon these particular cases, for they .are so far 
 apart that there is no probability that either of us could draw up a report 
 that both of us would sign. Besides if Ferguson is still a member, you 
 will have the legal and proper number (three) still upon the board to 
 make up a majority report. As for mj^ own action about these cases. I 
 am perfectly willing to await what develops and results, as the only vin- 
 dication I shall need, either at the hands of the College or the State. 
 
 As soon as I can go to Orono to inspect the buildings, I will make to 
 you my final report of what I find, as Mr. Gowell writes me the dressing 
 will all be moved from the cellar within a few days. 
 
 I am yours truly. 
 
 Geo. H. Bailev. V. S. 
 
Majority Report of Commissioners for 
 
 Maine on Contagious Diseases 
 
 of Animals. 
 
To the President of the Senate and Speaker of the House 
 ■of Representatives. 
 
 The extensive and disastrous outbreak of tuberculosis at 
 the State College Farm was for the first time brought to 
 my attention during the first week in March, 188(5, at which 
 time I received a telegram from Z. A. Gilbert, chairman of 
 the "Board of Cattle Commissioners," to go at once to Orono 
 and inspect the College herd, which at that time numbered 
 over fifty head of thoroughbred Jersey and Short-horn cattle. 
 Arriving at the farm, I for the first time met with President 
 Fernald, Professors Balentine and Jordan, and Mr. G. M. Gow- 
 ell, the eflScient Superintendent, who afforded me every facil- 
 ity to examine the animals, and from whom I received such 
 information and history of their cases as enabled me promptly 
 to come to the conclusion that a large proportion of the ani- 
 mals were affected with tuberculosis, perhaps better known 
 to the public at large as phthisis pulmonalis or consumption. 
 The result of subsequent examinations and consultations with 
 the State and College ofBcials, and finally with Dr. C. B. 
 Michener, who was detailed for this service by the Commis- 
 sioner of Agriculture at Washington, culminated, as is now 
 well known, in the condemnation and destruction of the whole 
 herd. As this is the first case on record in which an entire 
 herd of anything like this numl)er and value have ever been 
 destroyed as the result of otficial investigation, and as some 
 most remarkable and interesting features of the disease have 
 developed in tracing its origin and progress, I feel obliged to 
 go at some length into such dry details of individual cases as 
 have a direct bearing upon some animals connected with the 
 College herd, which are now in my opinion a constant menace 
 
 (189) 
 
190 
 
 to the future cattle interests of Maine. The outbreak at 
 
 « 
 
 Orono has probably invited more gfratuitous criticism and at- 
 tention from stock owners and the general public than would 
 have attached to any other public or private enterprise, owing 
 in great part to the prominent position to which the State 
 College has attained as a teacher and promoter of scientific 
 advancement and progressive farming in this State ; and I 
 believe the Trustees and Faculty of the Institution, as well as 
 the Cattle Commissioners, should challenge and invite the full- 
 est inquiry and investigation into both causes and results, to 
 which the public are justly entitled. 
 
 At the time of my first visit I found the buildings in which 
 the cattle were contained were among the best and most com- 
 modious I had ever visited, and that every provision for the 
 maintenance of perfect health among its occupants had been 
 fully and amply secured. An abundance of sunlight and pure 
 water, scrupulous cleanliness, sufficient and wholesome nu- 
 trition, thorough drainage, and ventilation so perfect that the 
 air was almost as pure inside the barn as out, — all contributed 
 to the uniformly fine appearance of this high-bred herd, which 
 proved so deceptive (upon further investigation) that, had it 
 not been for the persistent and pathognomonic cough by 
 which they one by one betrayed their real condition, I should 
 have much doubted the correctness of my decision. The 
 rough coat and arched spine, the difficult and la])ored res- 
 piration, the sunken eye and pendulous abdomen, with ex- 
 treme debility and emaciation, were nearly all absent in this 
 herd, the judicious attention to hygiene, and the untiring care- 
 taking of their faithful Superintendent, accounting in a great 
 measure for the slow but sure development of the disease, a 
 circumstance that so long deceived the attendants and College 
 officials themselves as to their true condition. Many of the 
 animals were also pregnant, and it is a well-known fact that 
 increase of the tubercular growth is then held in abeyance, 
 the energies of the nutritive processes of the body being di- 
 verted to the nourishment and growth of the foetus, while af- 
 
191 
 
 ter parturition the system is for si time debilitated, and rapid 
 extension of tubercle is favored. Individual members of the 
 herd were of great excellence, several cows having "butter 
 records" of 16^ pounds per week, while 150 pounds of "gilt- 
 edofed" butter was beino: sold in Baniror market weeklv. 
 xVbout ten days before my visit the Jersey cow Pet, No. 40, 
 P. M., fourteen years old, had become so emaciated that she 
 had been killed, and lay frozen in the field adjoining the sta- 
 bles, and this cadaver furnished me with ample opportunity 
 to verify my diagnosis. From this cow I obtained the lungs, 
 and a cross-section of the pulmonary tissue revealed the pres- 
 ence of numerous yellow tubercles, large and small cavities 
 filled with a muco-purulent mass, others with caseous mate- 
 rial. The lungs presented the identical lesions afterwards 
 found in most of the animals at Orono, and of the peculiar 
 metamorphosis which tubercles undergo, those of caseous de- 
 generation afford the most favorable conditions for infecting 
 the expired air of diseased animals. At the time of my sec- 
 ond visit, March 12th, from among ten or twelve cows I had 
 previously ordered isolated from the others, I selected two 
 Jersey cows, Princess Alice, No. 44, P. M., and Princess 
 Alba, No. 27, P. M., (the latter I then regarded as a typical 
 case), and had them destroyed for post-mortem examination. 
 Princess Alba had a temperature of 103 3-5°, marked emacia- 
 tion, and dullness on percussion over the right lung, while aus- 
 cultation clearly disclosed humid crackling or gurgling rales. 
 The autopsy revealed an extraordinary amount of disease. 
 The lung, pericardial and pleural membranes were loaded with 
 deposit, which hung like bunches of grapes, exhibiting a 
 perfect case of what is known as "anglcberries.'^ In some 
 parts theie was scared}^ a remnant of proper lung-structure 
 detectable, while others contained large tubercles filled with 
 caseous material and also cavities connecting with bronchia, 
 whose contents had been expectorated or absorbed. The 
 l)ronchial glands in this case had attained enormous dimen- 
 sions, the thymous weighing several pounds, and altogether 
 
192 
 
 the lesions were as extensive and varied as in any subsequent 
 autopsy. I shall have occasion to speak particularly of this 
 cow again as the dam of the "Kent bull" of Bucksport. The 
 lungs of Princess Alice were studded with miliary tubercles 
 scattered throughout them, while the bronchial lymphatic 
 glands contained calcified material that grated under the knife 
 when attempting to cut it. Mr. Gowell wrote me on March 
 20th : "There is not a very marked change in many of the 
 cattle, but in others, particularly those isolated in the stable, 
 the process of 'wearing out' is going on actively, and every 
 day's developments go to sustain my conviction and opinion 
 expressed I)efore notifying the 'Board of Commissioners' 
 that tilt entire herd ivas doomed. Unpleasant as it was, / 
 was forced to recognize the truths 
 
 On April 6th, the Commissioners met with the Governor 
 and Council, at Orono, when the herd was again inspected and 
 final action recommended at an early date. I then suggested 
 to Governor Robie the propriety of requesting the Hon. 
 Norman J. Colman, Commissioner of Agriculture, at Wash- 
 ington, to send Professor Salmon, or some other expert ex- 
 aminer from his office, to consult and advise with the Cattle 
 Commissioners, as to the proper disposal of so valuable a 
 herd. The request was promptly complied with and Dr. Ch. 
 B. Michener, Professor of Cattle Pathology and Obstetrics at 
 the American Veterinary College of New York was detailed 
 for this service. 
 
 How well that service was performed, was the subject of a 
 personal letter from Gov. Robie to Commissioner Colman, in 
 which was conveyed the high appreciation of the State and 
 College oflicials of the great value of Dr. Michener's timely 
 and professional assistance. Personally I am resting under 
 renewed and lasting obligatious, for sound counsel and advice, 
 relieving me iu a great measure from the responsibilities de- 
 volving upon me as Veterinary Officer of the "Board of Com- 
 missioners on Contagious Diseases." Dr. Michener arrived 
 April 21st, and on the 22d and 23d, after a careful and criti- 
 
193 
 
 cal examination of every animal in the herd, it was fonnd 
 necessary to condemn them all, when they were forthwith ex- 
 peditiously and humanely killed, and the post-mortems, openl}' 
 made in the presence of the Governor, prominent physicians, 
 stock-owners, reporters and others interested, the autopsies 
 in every instance revealing the fact that the disease had been 
 correctly interpreted, and that every animal presented unmis- 
 takable lesions of tuberculosis. 
 
 Much unfriendly comment has already been indulged in in 
 regard to these cases by parties who entertained crude and 
 erroneous ideas upon the subject, and it has been stated that 
 too "much science," book farming, concentrated food, "cot- 
 ton-seed meal," &c., were each or all the cause of their de- 
 struction, l)ut having been put in possession of the formula 
 and amount of feed furnished, I am able to state that there is 
 no foundation in fact for any such allegations, and that the 
 true cause lies "far and beyond" all such considerations. In 
 no instance were over three pounds per day of cotton-seed 
 meal furnished to cows giving a full flow of milk, and heifers 
 carrying their first calf (Primiperas) have never received a 
 particle, while the post-mortem appearance of the latter am- 
 mah j)rese7ited fuU^ as severe lesions of tubercles as thejormer^ 
 and calves which had never received any other nourishment 
 than their mothers' milk were found to be thoroughly dis- 
 eased. No writer of the period has given to posterity so 
 classical a description of these devastations among animals as 
 Virgil in his "Georgics." 
 
 "Not whirlwinds from the sea so frequent rush. 
 Big with storm, as pests mid cattle rage, 
 Nor individuals sole disorders seize. 
 But, suddenl}'^, whole flocks, with every liope, 
 At once, and, from the youngest, all the race." 
 
 In my earnest endeavors to trace the origin of the disease 
 among the College herd, I was surprised to find that as long 
 ago as 1876, Mr. J. R. Farrington, who was then Superin- 
 tendent of the State farm, sold to Mr. Henry Boardman, of 
 
 13 
 
194 
 
 Bangor, two cows that proved a few years later to result in 
 chronic cases of tuberculosis. Mr. Boardman, who for 
 many years has carried on an extensive milk-tarm near Ban- 
 gor, has very kindly furnished me with the details of the 
 purchase and disposal of these cows, so that I am enabled to 
 establish the fact that these were the primary cases developed 
 upon the College farm. Mr. Gowell writes me, under date of 
 January 11th, "I presume you have now sufficient proof to 
 show that the disease was on the farm when Mr. Farrington 
 was here. I have looked in every direction for light previous 
 to 1876, but have been forced to give it up." So it would 
 seem to be settled that the disease has been smouldering in 
 this herd for at least ten years, only to lift its hydra-head the 
 past season, and cause the total destruction of the entire herd. 
 On October 3rd, 1876, Mr. Farrington sold to Mr. Board- 
 man one red grade Jersey cow, five years old, named Su- 
 san, for $40.00, and on November 25th, 1876, sold him a red 
 and white grade Durham cow, called Dora, for $50.00. Mr. 
 Boardman tells me Hhis latter cow always had a cough, from 
 the time he received her'' until he sold her to a butcher, March 
 8th, 1879, and when killed was found to be full of tubercles, 
 on the liver and lungs, and on the ribs and plates well up 
 to the throat." Upon Mr. Boardman's attention being called 
 to the matter he refunded the butcher $38.00 of the amount 
 paid him, and the carcass of the cow was sold to "boil out' 
 at "one and a half" cents per pound. Mr. Boardman kept 
 Susan five years, (during which time she failed to breed) 
 when she wasted away and died of consumption, and he had 
 her buried "hide and all," and these are the only cases that 
 ever proved diseased upon his premises, in an experience in 
 dairying extending over many years, in which he has always 
 kept from ten to forty cows. Right here, a very significant 
 fact presents itself, proving conclusively to my mind, that the 
 cows sold to Mr. Boardman were predisposed to the disease 
 when they left the College farm, by a letter received from 
 Mr. Gowell, under date of March 20th, 1886, in which he 
 
195 
 
 says, "I have learned of several animals, aside from Mr. 
 Boardman's, that were sold Jroni the herd six or seven years 
 ago and slaughtered that ivere found to be far gone loith dis- 
 eased lungs. These statements have been brought to me by 
 purchasing parties. Last f:ill I sold a young bull to a neigh- 
 bor, to-day he tells me the bull has a "stiff neck" and small 
 bunch behind ear. These are the symptoms of disease shown 
 by our heifers that I told you of. I told him I would notify 
 you when you came again. Will you not arrange to remain 
 iiere an additional day and attend to the case? I am anxious 
 about it." Two items of this important statement attract my 
 attention, and these I have underlined. The first : — that sev- 
 eral animals aside from Mr. Boardman's sold six or seven 
 years ago "were found far gone with the disease," would 
 carry them back to 1879 and '80, just about the same time 
 Boardman's cow Dora was found to be thoroughly diseased, 
 and unquestionably from the same source. The second : — that 
 the young bull sold to his neighbor had a "stiff neck." i\Ir. 
 Gowell had previously told me of this symptom among some 
 young heifers, which at the time he attributed to feeding out 
 of high troughs, and I had explained to him that it is only 
 in exceptional cases that in the course of this malady altera- 
 tions are not found in the lymphatic glands of the head, neck 
 or chest, especially in the submaxillary, parotid and thoracic, 
 (which would give young animals the appearance of stiff 
 neck) as well as in the lymphatic glands. 
 
 Mr. Farrington remained Superintendent of the State Farm 
 until 1878, when, after serving another year as "Instructor of 
 Agriculture," he received the responsible appointment of 
 Superintendent of the State Reform School, which position 
 he now holds. .\t the close of 1877, Mr. Farrington turned 
 over to his successor, Mr. Timothy G. Rich, thirty-four ani- 
 mals, comprising seven Short-Horns, eight Ayrshires, nine 
 Jerseys, ten Grades, and his last annual report to the Trustees 
 of the Maine State College ])ecomes so important, in the light 
 of subsequent events, that I give place to his full statement 
 of the names and valuo of stock then upon the College farm. 
 
196 
 
 Short-Horn cow Cornelia, 11 years old $150 00 
 
 " heifer Cornucopia, 3 years old 125 00 
 
 «' " Duchess of Maine, 3 years 150 00 
 
 " calf Cornucopia, 2nd, 3 months old.. 25 00 
 
 *' bull Napoleon, 3rd, 2 years old 150 00 
 
 «* " Dirigo, 19 months old 50 00 
 
 " " calf Duke of Maine, 3 months old, 25 00 
 
 Ayrshire bull Hiempsal, 4 years old 125 00 
 
 cow Olee, 6 years old 200 00 
 
 " *' Isabel, 7 years old 150 00 
 
 " " Olivia, 3 years old 140 00 
 
 " " Oleeannee, 2 years old 85 00 
 
 " " Oletta, 15 months old 70 00 
 
 " heifer calf Olivia, 2nd, 5 months 35 00 
 
 «' " Isabel, 2nd, 3 months old 35 00 
 
 Jersey bull Harry, 2 years old 75 00 
 
 " calf Harry, 2nd, 6 months old 30 00 
 
 '« '< " Prince Peter, 2nd, 6 months old. . 25 00 
 
 " cow Hebe, 11 years old 250 00 
 
 ♦' " Pride of Lachine, 8 years old 200 00 
 
 " heifer Hepsy, 3 years old 200 00 
 
 K " Pride of the Island, 17 months old. 
 
 " " Hester Hart, 17 months old 
 
 *' calf Helen, 10 months old 
 
 Grade Short-Horn heifer Maggie, 3rd, 3 years old, 
 Ayrshire heifer Jennie, 19 months old. . 
 
 " Gipsey, 2nd, 19 months old, 
 
 Jersey cow, Maggie, 8 years old 
 
 " Topsey, 7 years old 100 00 
 
 *' Gipsey, 5 years old 
 
 ' ' May, 3 years old 
 
 heifer Topsey, 2nd, 17 months old, 
 " Topsey, 3rd, 10 months old, 
 One two years' old steer 
 
 Number of animals, 34. Value $3,020 00 
 
 65 
 
 00 
 
 75 
 
 00 
 
 50 
 
 00 
 
 05 
 
 00 
 
 35 
 
 00 
 
 40 
 
 00 
 
 70 
 
 00 
 
 100 
 
 00 
 
 70 
 
 00 
 
 G5 
 
 00 
 
 45 
 
 00 
 
 25 
 
 00 
 
 20 
 
 00 
 
197 
 
 Mr. T. G. Rich made his first annual report as Farm Super- 
 intendent in 1878, when the number of the herd was stated 
 to be twenty-five, and the vahie, $1165.00. Mr. Rich's second 
 annual report was in 1879, at which time the herd numbered 
 twenty-seven head, seven of these being calves one year old 
 or less, and no value is given. Mr. Rich's third annual report 
 was in 1880, at which time the herd numbered thirty-six, 
 seventeen of which were calves one year old or less, and no 
 value given. Mr. Rich's last annual report was in 1881, at 
 which time the herd numbered twenty-eight head, fourteen 
 of them being calves one year old or less, and no value given. 
 Mr. Rich's own reports, given almost "verbatim," as I now 
 present them, would leave him as making a most unfavorable 
 showing of his management of farm afiairs, were it not as I 
 now understand it, that the Trustees, yielding to the "popular 
 demand" that the hay crop be increased, and the farm be put 
 upon a paying basis, if possible, gave such instructions to Mr. 
 Rich. In pursuance of such demands, Mr. Rich disposed of 
 quite a number of thoroughbred animals, selected by his pre- 
 decessor, selling them at a great deduction from cost as well 
 as their actual value at the time, and replaced them with 
 cheaper cattle. But the fact still remains that Mr. Rich 
 must have known that he had a "contagious disease" of some 
 kind to contend with, and if he had killed or sold the entire 
 lot, it would have proved a "blessing to the State." He did 
 sell several animals from the herd, (according to Mr. Gowell) 
 that upon ^'heing slaughtered %vere found to be far gone with 
 tilt disease." He himself killed an Ayrshire in 1880, that 
 he tells me ^'coughed and ^k"»«Z away,'''' and another at 
 pasture in 1881, that died from an "unknown trouble." He 
 turned over to Mr. Gowell, in 1882, the grade Short-Horn 
 cow Maggie 3rd, afterward killed, who was coughing when he 
 let her go ; he also turned over Rose 8th, the thoroughbred 
 Short-Horn cow that failed to breed, and upon being slaugh- 
 tered was found to be badly affected, and last but not least, 
 he turned over Hepsy and "Helen Hart," (No. 5, Post-mor" 
 
19« 
 
 tem rej)ort) the latter cow the mother of tioo bulls sold from 
 the farm, now coming two and three years old, and also 
 Helen's calf (No. 6 P. M.) "Helen Hart" was out of ''Hepsy 
 Hart" and she out of Hebe, a Jersey cow, that refused to breed 
 and fell away in flesh in Mr. Rich's hands, and he sold her to 
 a butcher in 1879, for twenty-two dollars, which was less than 
 ten per cent of what Mr. Farrington paid for her, he having 
 bought her of Dr. Boutelle in 1874, for two hundred and fifty 
 dollars. I am in possession of all the College reports of Farm 
 Superintendent from 186(3, for twenty years down to Mr. 
 Gowell's last report in 1886, and in but a single instance do 
 I find any mention of the loss of one animal, either by acci- 
 dent or disease, excepting that Mr. Farrington, in 1875, 
 reports the loss of the Short-Horn bull Napoleon (sire of 
 Maggie, dam of Maggie 3rd), 5 years old, "who died from 
 an unknown disease that appeared to be an affection of the 
 salivary glands," and in 1877, he lost the Short-Horn cow 
 "Duchess of Lakeside" from gastritis (inflammation of the 
 stomach.) 
 
 President Wm. P. Wingate, in his report to the Senate and 
 House of Representatives, in 1881, announced Mr. Rich's 
 resignation and the appointment of Mr. G. M. Go well, then 
 President of the State Board of Agriculture, and said, "Mr. 
 Go well is fully in sympathy with the purposes of the College, 
 and has a clear apprehension of its importance as a part of the 
 educational system of the State. He is a progressive and 
 successful farmer, and in matters pertaining to agriculture in 
 Maine is abreast with the best thought and practice of the 
 times. It is believed that he possesses special qualifications 
 for the position." Mr. Gowell's first annual report was in 
 1882, when the stock was composed of twenty-five cattle, 
 "one pair of oxen, seventeen cows, two bulls, two yearling 
 steers and two heifer calves. Included in the above are the 
 following thoroughbreds : one Short-Horn bull, one year old ; 
 one Jersey bull, one year old ; three Jersey cows and two 
 Short-Horn cows. The larger part of the herd is a pure cross 
 
199 
 
 between the Jersey and Ayrshire breeds," the Jersey predom- 
 inating. In 1883, he says, "Earnest efforts have been made 
 to improve the stock, and there are now forty cattle, twenty- 
 four of them beinff thorouo:hbred. The Short-Horn herd con- 
 tains five animals. The A. J. C. C. herd consists of eight, and 
 of 'Maine Jerseys' there are twelve. Among the members of 
 these herds I am free to say there is not an inferior animal. 
 In the breeding of Short-Horns, the aim has been to unite, so 
 far as possible, the qualities of growth, thrift, and flesh with 
 the ability to produce milk. In breeding both classes of 
 Jerseys, constitutional vigor and rich milking powers have 
 been sought for. The remainder of the herd are of a cross 
 between the Jersey and Ayrshire breeds." In 1884, Mr. 
 Gowell's third annual report says, "The herd of cattle con- 
 sists of forty-two animals, thirty-seven of which are thorough- 
 bred. Of these, five arc Short-Horns, nineteen are 'Maine 
 Jerseys,' and thirteen are 'Cattle Club' Jerseys. Among the 
 Jerseys are some large producers, of good breeding, partak- 
 ing largely of the blood of the great butter families of the 
 world. Most of the cows are young, many not having ma- 
 tured yet. The young animals have mostly been bred upon 
 the farm, and are vigorous, well-developed specimens of their 
 respective breeds. Sales of young bulls to farmers, for breed- 
 ing, have been frequent, but the heifers have mostly been re- 
 tained, as the farm is yet under-stocked." In 1885, Mr. 
 Gowell reports, "There are upon the farm forty-six cattle, 
 forty of them being thoroughbred. Of these, eight are 
 Short-Horns, sixteen are 'Maine State' Jerseys, and sixteen 
 are 'Cattle Club' Jerseys. Approved bulls are at the head 
 of these herds, and the young animals produced are of nuich 
 excellence. Twenty-six cows and heifers are now in milk." 
 Mr. Gowell's last report, of 1886, has just been published, 
 and his summary says : "The herd numbered fifty-one ani- 
 mals before its destruction. Forty-eight of them were regis- 
 tered thoroughbreds, and the remaining three were cross- 
 bred Jerse3'-Ayrshires. Of the forty-eight thoroughbreds, 
 
200 
 
 ten were Short-Horns, seventeen were 'Maine State Jerseys,' 
 and twenty-one were 'American Cattle Club Jerseys.' These 
 animals, or the stock from which they were bred, had 
 mostly been selected in different localities, where desirable 
 specimens could be found, and placed here within the last five 
 years. The aim had been to secure the best animals obtaina- 
 ble, and as the result of this selection and breeding the herd 
 had attained a very high degree of excellence." No values 
 are placed upon the herds in any of the years since Mr. 
 Gowell has been Superintendent. The following report of 
 Dr. Michener will be read with interest in this connection : 
 
 269 W. 38th Street, New York, April 29, 1886. 
 To His Excellency^ Frederick Bobie, Esq., Governor of Maine: 
 
 Dear Sir: — Pursuant to an order from Hon. Norman J. Colman, 
 United States Commissioner of Agi'iculture, I started on the 19tli instant 
 for Orono, Maine, to advise witli your State Veterinarian, Dr. George H. 
 Bailey, as to what disposition should be made of the cattle belonging to 
 the State College farm. Arriving there before the State authorities, I 
 had ample time to study carefully the history and surroundings of the 
 herd. 
 
 From G. M. Gowell, Superintendent of the farm, I learned that for the 
 past eight or ten years there occurred an occasional death among the cat- 
 tle, and as nearly as I could judge from his description, these animals 
 were affected with the same disease that prevailed at this examination. 
 
 The trouble was evidently a pulmonary one, a more or less persistent 
 cough, irregular or hurried breathing and emaciation being witnessed 
 in all. 
 
 I was first led to examine the hygienic surroundings. The barn is a 
 large one and has ample room for the stock. It is well lighted and 
 thoroughly ventilated, the air being surprisingly pure as I entered the 
 building early in the morning. The stalls are kept very clean, as the 
 animals themselves show. The manure is thrown in the basement, but a 
 free current of air prevents any appreciable odor from arising to the 
 stable. The feeding is judicious in every sense, and the food, both grain 
 and hay, is of the best quality. 
 
 From the history of the previous cases, and upon examining a few of 
 the cattle that presented the most marked symptoms, I was able to 
 diagnose the disease as tuberculosis, beyond any reasonable doubt. 
 
 Upon the arrival of the State authorities it was decided to destroy 
 some of the worst cases for post-mortem purposes. The animals thus 
 selected were some that State Veterinarian Bailey had previously exam- 
 ined and placed by themselves in the horse barn. I will refer to some 
 
201 
 
 of them by name ami jjivc llic lesions presented. Cow Pansy presented 
 minicrons miliary lubcroles throii<5hont the left luiig, and in the rij^liL 
 were masses of tubercular ileposits of various sizes, situated chiefly near 
 the apex of the lung. These masses had become cheesy or calcareous. 
 
 Hyacinth presented smaller aggregations of grayisii white nodules 
 throughout tiie substance of both lungs. 
 
 Flossy — both lungs affected; iu the rigiit lung near its center was no- 
 ticed a large abscess, due to softening and breaking down of tubercMilar 
 deposits. The left humero-radial, or elbow joint, was considerably enlargeil 
 and had given rise to lamcuess during tlie past few montlis. The knee 
 joint of the same leg was lirst involved, but now appeared iiealthy. The 
 synovial membrane and extremities of the humerus and radius were in a 
 diseased condition, but pi'esented no calcareous deposits or appearances 
 of rheumatoid arthritis. The prepectoral and brachial lymphatic glands 
 were found to contain much cheesy and calcareous matter. 
 
 Cows Edith. Crummie, ^Mildred. Blanch, and others showed extensive 
 granulations on the costal and pulmonaiy plcune, which iu some instances 
 lirmly united the lungs to the ribs. 
 
 IJelen Hart, in addition to similar lesions of the thoracic organs, re- 
 vealed well-developed tubercles iu the udder. Some of these hail broken 
 down and their contents was discharged into the milk sinuses, and tainted 
 the milk — a fact that had been observed by those in charge for some days. 
 
 It does not appear necessary for me to detail the lesions found in indi- 
 vidual cases beyond tiiis, except to remark that other organs of the body 
 were frequently involved — liver, intestines, etc. The calves presented 
 mostly diseased conditions of lymphatic glands and intestines; diarrha'a 
 and other digestive disorders being liere most marked. 
 
 Out of the forty-seven (17) head dcstroj'ed, all (four or live calves were 
 not examined, but were killed because of being the offspring of diseased 
 dams, and having occupied the infected barn,) presented symptoms which, 
 as you are probably aware, were accurately interpreted iu every instance, 
 even where but very small and deep-seated portions of liuig tissue were 
 involved. 
 
 The uniformity of these symptoms and pathological lesions must prove 
 to all thinking minds (whether little or nothing is known of the appear- 
 ance of the disease in question) that there existed in each individual 
 member of the herd one and the same disease. 
 
 That this disease; is both hereditarj"^ and contagious seems also patent 
 from the fact that calves scarcely one month old were plainl}' allVotcd, 
 and that those animals recently bought and placed with tlie diseased 
 cattle show upon post-mortem examination the initial lesions of this 
 malady. 
 
 In answer to those who contend that this disease was caused by im- 
 proper feeding, or lack of suflicient ventilation and exercise, it is only 
 necessary to remind you that tuberculosis, like small pox and similar dis- 
 eases, is a specific malady, one that can only be spread by coming in 
 contact in some way with its special and determined infecting agent. 
 
202 
 
 The assertions that cotton-seed meal had anything to do with the origin 
 or spread of this disease are simply ridiculous. 
 
 Taking into consideration, then, the facts that a very large proportion 
 of the herd (all, we might almost say) were affected with a disease com- 
 municahle not only from animal to animal, but from animal to man ; that 
 in the future, death after death would occur yearly; that scarcely by any 
 possibility could calves be raised from any of these cows that would 
 reach maturity free from this pestilence ; that animals purchased else- 
 where and placed with this herd would (as past experience proves) soou 
 become diseased ; and that the barn itself is now infected, and must be left 
 vacant for a considerable period; parts of it (floors, etc.) removed aiid 
 burned, and a thorough and repeated disinfection be resorted to, — it be- 
 comes apparent to all, I think, that the only safe and proper course to 
 pursue was the one advised, i. e., the slaughter of the entire herd. 
 
 Some of the meat might have been used as food had it not been for the 
 prejudice that was so generally felt against it. For some time it has 
 been impossible to sell even the butter from these cows, and I was assured 
 by every one likely to know, that under no circumstances could a pound 
 of the meat be disposed of now, or even months later. 
 
 The swine on the farm, that had been fed largelj'^ on the milk of these 
 cows, were examined, and one pig nearly a year old was killed and care- 
 fully examined, but no traces of the tuberculosis could be detected. The 
 butcher who kills the pigs raised on the farm states that in some in- 
 stances the liver has appeared diseased. In conclusion, I can only recom- 
 mend that when other animals are purchased, care be taken to buy from 
 tlie herds where the disease has never existed, and that each animal be 
 examined, at the time of purchase, by your State Veterinarian. 
 
 Very respectfully, 
 
 Ch. B. Michener, V. S., 
 
 Inspector Bureau of Animal Indnslnj. 
 
 I fully concur witii the above report. 
 
 Geo. H. Bailey, D. V. S., 
 
 Commissioner for 3Iainc on Contagious Diseases of Animals. 
 
 The buildings have been disinfected through the agency of 
 carbolic acid, sulphuric acid, copperas solution and fumes of 
 burning sulphur. Those parts of the floors upon which ani- 
 mals stood were removed and replaced by new material. 
 
 The quarantine was raised by the following communication 
 
 Nov. 18, 1886: 
 
 Portland, Nov. 18, 1886. 
 
 To the Trustees of the Maine State College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts: 
 
 This is to certify that on November 10th I visited Orono to inspect the 
 buildings that had contained the Jersej' herd destroyed by order of the 
 Cattle Commissioners, and find that all the recommendations and require- 
 
203 
 
 merits prescribed by Dr. Michencr nml myself have been faithfully com- 
 plied with, and believe the buildings to be in a safe condition to introduce 
 new stock, as it is [tossiblo to make them through the agency of disin- 
 fectants and thorongh ventilation. The means adopted meet my entire 
 
 approval. 
 
 Gko. U. Baii.icv, 1). V. S., 
 
 State Vctcnnartj Surgeon. 
 
 Mr. Gowell writes to luc, under date of Deecmber 13th, 
 1886, ill reply to my inquiry, "Mr. Rich turned over to me 
 quite a lot of young steers that 1 sokl within tiie next few 
 months, excepting one pair that I kept a year or over. lie 
 also left some seven or eight cows. The most of them were 
 ke[)t by me during the next year. Four of them were kept 
 until 1884, two were kept until 1885, and one, Helen Hart, 
 (No. 5, P. M.) until last spring. As I have previously told 
 you, fhe old Short-Horn coio was coughing in 1882, ichen 1 
 came here. By good feeding she seemingly recovered, at least 
 the cough ceased, and she did choice work for a year or more, 
 when she again failed and was destroyed. No examination was 
 made of her after slaughtering. Another of these cows was Rose 
 8th, of the Short-Horn Herd Book — a young cow — she refused 
 to breed and becoming fat was sold for beef, and upon being 
 butchered ivas found badly affected, as I have before told you." 
 So, to state it plainly, Mr. Go well received from Mr. Rich 
 in 1882 a "legacy of corruption" that has already cost the 
 State thousands of dollars, when, if at that time he had 
 promptly destroyed this meagre and worthless "band of non- 
 descripts," and thoroughly disinfected his premises, the splen- 
 did herd he afterwards so prudently selected and so carefully 
 reared upon the College farm would undoubtedly have been 
 alive and well to-day — alike creditable and profitable to the 
 State — instead of having found a nameless sepulchre upon 
 the banks of the Penol)scot. It is but simple justice to Mr. 
 Gowell to say that he purchased only the most approved ani- 
 mals "whenever and wherever" they could be bought to the 
 best advantage, and the "personnel" of the herd at Orono 
 was the best endorsement he could have asked, that they were 
 critically and intelligently selected, but when he had collected 
 
204 
 
 them together and domiciled them with the contaminated mon- 
 grels he had of Rich, he led them into the presence of a "pesti- 
 lence that walketh m darkness, and a destruction that wasteth 
 at noonday." In no instance have I been able to learn of a 
 single herd or a single town in Maine, from which these ani- 
 mals wcie purchased, that down to the present time have 
 ever been afiected with tuberculosis, and I am led irresisti- 
 bly to the conclusion that the disease that finally consumed 
 the entire herd at Orono was generated, developed and con- 
 fined within the boundaries of the College farm, and if no 
 animals had ever been sold from the herd, we could now 
 report the malady as completely and effectively stamped out. 
 The old cow Hebe, the "Jonah" of the College lot, was 
 purchased from Dr. Boutelle, and I believe the purity and 
 freedom from disease of his herd has never been called in 
 question. Two cows, Juno 2nd and Juliette, came from 
 Briggs & Son, Maple Grove Stock Farm, and their herd are 
 clean and healthy, to my own personal knowledge. Mr. B. 
 F. Briggs writes me from Auburn, "Pet, the dam of Juli- 
 ette, was sold to a neighbor of ours. She was, to the day of 
 her death, a perfectly healthy and strong cow, and all of her 
 descendants have been, and so have the descendants of Juno 
 2nd." Several came from Winthrop, and I have never heard 
 of a "Maine State Jersey" having tuberculosis in the town 
 they came from, and it is so with all the others ; the "fountain 
 head" was pure until mixed up with the polluted herd at 
 Orono. There is plenty of "food for reflection" in such start- 
 ling evidences of contagion as these cases afford, Avhich should 
 be well considered by prudent men, in the purchase of animals 
 to increase their herds or to lay the foundation of new ven- 
 tures in that direction. The evidence all goes to show that 
 the animals purchased by Mr. Gowell were not only sound 
 when he bought them, but were from sound j)arentage, and 
 that they were themselves affected by contact with the old 
 members of the College herd, while their produce would have 
 a tri-fold tendency to disease by contagion and heredity and 
 also through the agency of the milk. Outside of these bulls 
 
205 
 
 that have been distributed about the State, there is not a single 
 case remaining above ground, that has ever been reported to 
 me, since I have been a member of the Board of State Com- 
 missioners. We have no contagious disease prevailing in 
 our Slate to-day, and it is not true that "there are a few 
 towns in Maine where losses by this disease have not oc- 
 curred." It is a "false alarm" to have that statement go out 
 with the endorsement of the College officials, who must have 
 been furnished their information by some party either design- 
 edly or who knew nothing of the facts. If it were true, how- 
 ever, there would be all the more reason why the Commis- 
 sioners should be empoivered to stamp it out. In an official 
 experience for the past five years upon the board, I have never 
 but once had my attention called to what proved to be a case 
 of phthisis, and that was the outbreak last May in a small 
 herd of native cattle at North Waterboro', where an old and 
 diseased cow, purchased in Shapleigh, had been introduced 
 into the herd, and slightly affected a few heifers ; one three- 
 year old and the weanling calf from the old cow were de- 
 stroyed, the buildings disinfected, and all settled at a very 
 small expense to the State. In my private practice I have 
 as yet seen only an isolated case, that of an inbred Jersey 
 heifer, whose sire was her own "full brother," and she was 
 afterwards destroyed. In reference to the Short-Horn cow, 
 Rose 8th, refusing to breed, which was also the case with the 
 cow Susan, sold to Mr. Boardman, and the thoroughbred Jer- 
 sey cow "Hebe," about whom I shall have more to say here- 
 after, it is a fact well recognized among veterinarians, that a 
 large number of phthisical animals only exceptionally breed, 
 or they remain totally sterile ; and this absence of the pro- 
 creative faculty has been indicated by many authorities, and 
 especially by Roloff, as one of the symptoms of tuberculosis. 
 "When the ovum is infected by the father or mother, it does not 
 become developed, or its developement is of short duration. 
 In such a case, coition will be unfruitful, or if the infection is 
 due to the mother, she will be rendered completely sterile." 
 If the foetus is infected during its development, it usually be- 
 
206 
 
 comes diseased and perishes before birth, being generally ex- 
 pelled from the uterus by abortion. 
 
 Having been informed by Mr. Go well that between the 
 time he became Superintendent and his notice to the Cattle 
 Commissioners, in March last, he had slaughtered five other 
 cows besides Maggie 3rd and Rose 8th, that all presented the 
 same condition of glands and lungs as the cow Pet, I have 
 since learned the first one of them that he caused to be de- 
 stroyed was the grade Short-Horn cow Maggie 3rd, killed in 
 the autumn of 1884. This cow was bred upon the farm from 
 a cow purchased in Orono, and was about ten years old when 
 killed. She was one of the cows turned over to Mr. Rich by 
 Mr. Farrington in 1878. The next was the thoroughbred 
 Short-Horn cow Rose 8th, slaughtered in 1885. This cow 
 was put upon the farm by Mr. Rich, when she was but a few 
 days old, and was bought with her dam in the town of Stark. 
 The Jersey heifers "Gray Nose" and "Jersey Lily" were 
 also killed in 1885. "Gray Nose" was bred upon the farm 
 and was out of Hyacinthe, one of the condemned cows, (see 
 No. 3, post-mortem report) and at the time of killing was 
 about two and a half years old. Jersey Lily was purchased 
 when about one year old, in Rockland, Me., together with her 
 dam "Princess Alba" (before referred to as the dam of the 
 Kent bull) and was about two years and nine months old 
 when killed. The Jersey heifer Brownie was also killed in 
 1885. She was bred upon the farm, was two years and three 
 months old when killed, and her glands and lungs were both 
 affected. Her dam was Juliette, (No. 32, P. M. reports). 
 The Jersey cow Betsey was killed in January, 1886. Betsey 
 was bred b^^ the late Samuel Guild of Augusta, and was 
 bought by Mr. Gowell in 1883, and at the same time he of- 
 fered Mr. Guild a very large price for her dam. Pet was 
 killed February 21st, 1886, about ten days before I was noti- 
 fied of the outbreak upon the farm. Pet was bred in Saga- 
 dahoc County, and was bought by Mr. Gowell in 1882. 
 
 This summary shows that these seven cows had succumbed 
 to the disease since Mr. Gowell had been in charge and pre- 
 
207 
 
 vious to any notification to the Commissioners, all of which 
 presented the same morbid appearance and lesions as were 
 found in the lungs of Pet (the cow I held the post-mortem on 
 at my first visit), thus establishing the fiict beyond all con- 
 troversy, that they were all the victims of tuberculosis, the 
 entire absence of the characteristic marbled appearance formed 
 by the exudation and consolidation of lymph into the inter- 
 lobular cellular tissue of the lung disposing entirely of the 
 pre-existing theory of contagious pleuro-pneumonia, of which 
 latter terrible scourge we have never yet had a case in Maine. 
 The State of Maine, however, in common with other New 
 England States, is seriously menaced by the near proximity of 
 this highly contagious disease, the only remedy for which, in 
 my opinion, lies in the swift enactment of such wise provis- 
 ions of law as shall anticipate emergencies only too likely to 
 arise. There are now no provisions of law whatever to pre- 
 vent the bringing into the State of cattle affected with either 
 contagious pleuro-pneumonia or tuberculosis, and I believe 
 our only safety depends upon promptly dofiing the borders of 
 our State against every State or Territory in which conta- 
 gious diseases are known to exist. We prohibit the importa- 
 tion of European cattle except under a quarantine of ninety 
 days. For the same reason precisely we should prohibit the 
 movement of cattle out from an infected State or district, ex- 
 cept under a quarantine of similar length. Every argument 
 that can be advanced in support of the one is equally valid 
 for the other, and if we allow this plague to reach our State, 
 it will matter little whether it has come from Liverpool or 
 New York : its virulent and deadly olfect will be the same. 
 Governor Bodwell struck the "key note" when he said in his 
 inaugural address: "P^uller authority should be given to the 
 State to destroy at once all cattle known to bo afiected with 
 the disease. The owners will not do the work of destruction 
 themselves on account of the direct loss incurred, and there- 
 fore the Government, as a general safeguard to the herd of 
 the State, should assume the task and the cost of instant de- 
 struction when the disease is ascertained to exist. One 
 
208 
 
 neglected case, that might have cost the State fifty dollars to 
 destroy, would possibly entail a loss of many thousands of dol- 
 lars to our cattle growers. It has cost England millions of 
 dollars in her efforts to extirpate the disease, and if the con- 
 tagion should break out among our vast herds on the West- 
 ern plains, the loss would be incalculable. Beside guarding 
 our own State by proper enactments on the subject, I recom- 
 mend that Congress be memorialized to take the utmost care 
 and precaution, through the national power, to prevent the 
 importation and spread of the disease." 
 
 The public cannot have forgotten the urgent warning they 
 received by the importation of "^Foot and Mouth Disease" at 
 Portland, during the winter of 1883, showing that even the 
 "broad Atlantic" offers no barrier to the approach of bovine 
 scourges from "across the sea," while the alarming increase 
 and concentration of pleuro-pneumonia at Chicago has become 
 of suiScient importance to invoke national legislation. The 
 last census gives the number of cattle in Maine as 334,421, 
 and the total value of live stock as $16,499,370, while the 
 national investment in cattle alone is $1,200,000,000. 
 
 There was a direct loss to the State of between three and 
 four thousand dollars by the destruction of the College herd, 
 and an appropriation has been asked for to restock the farm. 
 I believe there are many reasons why this claim should be 
 allowed, and some such improved breeds of cattle purchased 
 as the past experience, the present embarrassments, and the 
 future prosperity of the College demand. The farm has 
 been brought by the present management into a high state of 
 cultivation, and was never so well and thoroughly equipped 
 as now for the safe and convenient handling of its abundant 
 harvests, while the addition during the past year of another 
 barn affords spacious and ample accommodations for sufficient 
 stock to consume their entire crop of hay and grain upon the 
 premises, thus enabling the farm to furnish an abundance of 
 "home-made" fertilizers, which shall always exceed in value 
 those of chemical production, however honestly compounded. 
 There will, moreover, be no need of going outside of Maine 
 
209 
 
 lo procure suitable cattle to stock the farm, for the enterprise 
 and forethought of our most prominent stock-raisers have, by 
 careful selection and importation, raised the standard of our 
 ■beef suppl}^ until there is no good and sufficient reason why 
 Maine should not produce all the beef we need, and of su- 
 perior quality to any we can purchase in the markets ol the 
 great West, while the splendid exhibition of cattle at our re- 
 cent State and Xew England Fairs, have never been excelled 
 either in "quality or quantity" in this country or Europe. 
 While endeavoring to full^-and faithfully present the etiology 
 and termination of the College cases, I believe no better op- 
 portunity will ever be afforded me than now to discuss the 
 causes and symptoms of the disease that has obtained so seri- 
 ous a foothold in our State, offering only such testimony as, 
 while instructive and convincing, is also susceptible of the 
 highest proof. 
 
 Walley, a very eminent English authority, says, "The 
 insidious nature of tuberculosis has perhaps had much to do 
 with the comparative slowness with which professional and 
 f)ul)lic opinion has been directed to it, but the strides which it 
 has made and the hold which it has gained on our stock render 
 it one of the most important questions affecting the future wel- 
 being of the bovine species. Looking at an individual tuber- 
 cle we might be led to despise its comparative insignificance, 
 and to ignore its deadly meaning ; but when we see thousands 
 upon thousands of these knots existing in the organism of a 
 single animal, a truth is forced upon our minds which we can- 
 not refuse to recognize — that we have to deal with an insidi- 
 ous, implacable and deadly foe ; and independently of its 
 ultimate fatality, I think I may with safety say, that no 
 morbid substance known to the pathologist is so protean as 
 tubercle in the number of functional derangements to which it 
 gives rise." 
 
 By common consent it seems to be conceded that Jerseys 
 and Short-Horns are most subject to tuberculosis. Animals 
 .that are in-bred, of a lymphatic temperament, attenuated 
 14 
 
210 
 
 figure, light barrels and narrow chests, are undoubtedly more 
 predisposed to tubercle than those in which conformation) 
 may be said to be more perfect. The Ayrshires and Hols- 
 teins, are, as a rule, quite free from it, but under the influence 
 of a change of climate they become particularly predisposed. 
 The solid colored and more hardy breeds, such as the Here- 
 fords, Sussex and Devons, seem to be peculiarly exempt 
 from disease, and it is claimed that the polled Aberdeenshirea 
 never develop it, hoAvever closely bred. The bovine tribe^ 
 however, is pre-eminently disposed, equally so with man ; and 
 next in order is the common rabbit. Pigs are vei-y prone tO' 
 tubercle, and also poultry. Tubercle is rarely seen in the 
 sheep, cat or dog, and I have never seen a case of it in the 
 horse. Phthisis means a wasting away, sometimes called 
 pining, but of late years the term has been mainly restricted 
 to that species of wasting disease which consists in the occu- 
 pation of the lungs by tubercular matter. In the bovine 
 species tubercle is renuirkable for it enormous deposit m 
 the lungs, although other parts are freely affected. 
 
 Tubercle may l)e confined to a non-vascular, gray, semi- 
 transpsirent nodule, varying in size, in the lower animals,, 
 from a millet seed to that of a hen's <^gg- The conversion 
 of the gray tubercle to the yellow is the most common retro- 
 gressive change. These tubercles, in a majority of cases,, 
 sooner or later, soften and liquefy into a condition that admits 
 of their expulsion or escape through the bronchial tubes which 
 communicate with the trachea ; there being left in the lung in 
 each case an excavation, a cavity or vomica. These vary 
 greatly in size ; as they may also vary in number. They 
 may be no bigger than a jDea, or they may be large enough 
 to contain a pint or more of fluid. Opening into these cavi- 
 ties there is always one, and there are generally several, per- 
 vious bronchial tubes, which seem as if they had been cut oflT 
 just where they enter the cavity, but you never, or very 
 seldom, find a blood-vessel thus entering into the cavity; 
 occasionally, but of very rare occurrence, a considerable 
 
211 
 
 blood-vessel does get laid open during the formation of a 
 vomica, and then copious and fatal hemmorrhage may ensue. 
 The true reason why bronchial tubes open into these cavities, 
 and blood-vessels do not, is to be found in the natural difler- 
 ences between these two sets of vessels, in respect to their 
 structure. The blood-tubes yield readily to external pres- 
 sure, and are pushed aside, while the bronchial lubes are 
 neither so easily compressed, nor do they carry any coagula- 
 ble fluid, but their open mouths remain at a point where the 
 tubercular matter stopped, and atford a channel, through 
 which the same matter, after it has liquefied, finds its way 
 toward the trachea. 
 
 According to Niemeyer, tubercular matter, when once de- 
 posited, increases in quantity, until at length it liquefies by a 
 sort of fatty degeneration. The tubercular matter becomes 
 soft, breaks down, and is ultimately expelled through the 
 bronchi, trachea and mouth. It is a remarkable and very 
 important fact, that tubercles when they att'oct the lungs, are 
 not deposited at random, but in the upper lobes. It is here 
 also that they first ripen and grow soft, and become ready 
 for expulsion through the bronchi and trachea, and it is here 
 also that we have the largest vomica. These facts have a 
 most important bearing upon a correct diagnosis, in cases 
 that might otherwise be doubtful, for the converse of this is 
 true of common inflammaticjn of the lungs. Pneumonia allects 
 by preference the lower lobes, and there is much practical 
 advantage in knowing these points of contrast. 
 
 In health, the lungs of bovines, weighing onl}'^ between six 
 and seven pounds, are so buoyant that they float upon the 
 water, while with lungs invaded with tubercular formations, 
 they often weigh fifty or sixty pounds, and immediately 
 descend to the bottom when placed in water. The liver is 
 also very apt to undergo remarkable changes. It sometimes 
 enlarges by becoming full of adipose matter which greases 
 the hands and scalpel when it is cut open, the entire gland 
 becoming soft, losing its natural red tint and assuming a pale 
 
212 
 
 fawn color. Sometimes the cut surface of a liver has a whit- 
 ish and glistenino: appearance and is then called a waxy liver, 
 and this condition was observed in several members of the 
 Orono herd. Tubercle kills by destroying the structures, 
 and consequently the functions, of organs in which it is 
 deposited. 
 
 The symptoms of tuberculosis in cattle, in its earliest 
 stages, are sometimes involved in more or less obscurity. 
 Prominent among these are unthriftiness, with a diminished 
 and capricious appetite. The animals are easily fatigued, and 
 have a weak and hoarse cough, that is almost diagnostic, the 
 skin is sensitive and dry, and the coat staring, the mucous 
 membranes are pale, the digestive organs are weak, and they 
 are prone to tympanitis. There is increase of temperature, 
 with a variable pulse. The milk is deteriorated in quality, 
 being blue and watery, and contains a lai-ger proportion of 
 alkaline salts ; but is less rich in nitrogenous matters, and fat 
 and sugar, than in health, proving that assimilation is defect- 
 ive. In herds predisposed to tubercle they often become 
 lame from some unassignable cause, when the post-mortem 
 examination proves that it is due to tubercular inflammation of 
 a joint. Flossy (No. 22, P. M.,) was a marked case of this 
 species of lameness in the College herd. If the animal is 
 compelled to walk quickly there is labored respiration, which 
 becomes so prominent as to assume the abdominal character, 
 if the pleura is invaded b}^ disease. Nymphomania, or exces- 
 sive sexual desire, is also frequent, but the animal is sterile; 
 as the malady develops, the cough becomes more persistent 
 and easily induced, and accompanied by muco-purulent expec- 
 toration. The animals are apathetic and sluggish in their 
 movements. Emaciation proceeds more or less rapidly, 
 extreme debility ensues, the eyes are sunken and brilliant, the 
 mouth is open and drawn back at the angles, the spine is 
 arched and tender, and the breath, as death approaches, 
 becomes cadaverous and foetid. Percussion gives dullness in 
 some parts of the chest, and in others the normal resonance. 
 
213 
 
 although the members of my profession do not possess equal 
 advantages with human practitioners, of "free and easy" access 
 to the chest wall, owing in great part to the thick skin and hair 
 of animals, as well as the wide distribution of the "serratus 
 magnus" muscle posterior to the scapula — while the sound 
 resulting from the first gentle tap upon or beneath the clavicle 
 in the human patient often only too clearly reveals lesions 
 that seal the fate of a valuable life. 
 
 Auscultation reveals an altered respiratory murmur ; it is 
 louder in some places than in others, and of a harsh and rush- 
 ing sound. Instead of the normal vesicular murmur, we find 
 the "dry ciackle" which is associated with incipient tubercle, 
 the cavernous or bronchial sounds which occur during the 
 passage of air into or out of a cavity in the lung, and the 
 humid crackling or gurgling rales, which are pathognomonic 
 of advanced tuberculization, and heard during the later stages 
 of nearly all cases of consumption. Large cre})itation depends 
 upon the passage of air through liquid?, but when pus or 
 liquid matter of any kind is collected in a vomica, which com- 
 municates freely with the trachea thorough pervious l)ronchi, 
 the ])ubbles produced by the entrance and exit of air will be 
 still more numerous and large ; and a sound is then produced 
 which the word gurgling well expresses. Whenever, there- 
 fore, we hear gurgling during respiration or during the act of 
 coughing, we conclude we have a cavity. Another constant 
 accompaniment of progressive phthisis is emaciation, and if, 
 without any apparent cause, an animal grows thin and weak, 
 with a quick pulse and labored respiration, these indications 
 are pregnant with meaning that tubercular disease is at work 
 in the lungs, and is' consuming life. The detection of the 
 disease is sometimes difficult. It is easy when the tubercles 
 are numerous, large or far advanced ; difficult when they are 
 scanty in number, thinly scattered and individually small, and 
 in the latter case would not cause any appreciable deviation 
 from the natural resonance of the chest on percussion, or 
 from the natural smooth, equal)le rustle of the breathing. 
 
214 
 
 % 
 
 The disease always terminates fatally, if the animal be per- 
 mitted to linger on, and it dies in a state of extreme marasmus. 
 The International Veterinary Congress, held at Brussels, in 
 1883, to discuss the Influence of Heredity and Contagion on the 
 Propagation of Tuberculosis, in summing up their labors, 
 arrived at the following conclusions. 
 
 1st. Tuberculosis has been observed in all warm-blooded 
 animals submitted to domesticity or deprived of their liberty. 
 
 2d. Tuberculosis in animals and mankind presents analo- 
 gous manifestations, in the living as in the dead creature. 
 
 3d. The course and termination of the disease in mankind 
 and animals is the same. 
 
 4th. The masses of tubercle, and especially the sputa of 
 the phthisical, produce tuberculosis in animals, when these 
 matters are introduced through the respiratory or digestive 
 apparatus, or through a deep wound. Tuberculosis inocu- 
 lated from man to animals, may in its turn be transmitted 
 from one animal to another, and always produces tuberculosis. 
 
 5th. Tuberculosis of man and of animals is transmitted by 
 heredity. 
 
 6th. The disease is contagious in man and animals. 
 
 7th. Clinical observations prove the transmission of tuber- 
 culosis from animals to man by consumption of the milk of 
 phthisical animals. 
 
 8th. Tuberculosis of animals and man is rare in cold cli- 
 mates. It is most frequent in southern countries; the trac- 
 ings of the geographical propagation of the disease in man 
 and animals is nearlj' parallel. 
 
 9lh. It is evidently proved that a pathogenic microbe, hav- 
 ing the same morphological and biological characters, exists 
 in the tubercle of man and in that of animals. This organ- 
 ism, whether it be developed in man or animals, may induce 
 tuberculosis when, cultivated in a pure state, it is conveyed 
 to the animal possessing the necessary receptivity. Accord- 
 ing to Koch, the bacteria of tubercle manifest themselves in 
 the form of threads of extreme tenuity, in length scarcely 
 one-half the diameter of a red blood-corpuscle, and in breadth 
 
215 
 
 At most one-fifth of their length. They are non-motile, with- 
 out proper motion, and form spores which are developed dur- 
 ing the life and iu the body of the affected creature. They are 
 never mixed with micrococci or other bacteria in tul)erculous 
 centres protected from the air. First and foremost among i)re- 
 ■disposir)g causes in the propagation of tuberculosis, among 
 bovines, is its hereditary tendency. 
 
 According to Walley, ''Heredilar}' tendency may be divided 
 into direct and indirect : the former when it is transmitted by 
 a, sire or dam to its immediate progeny, the latter when only 
 transmitted to the second or third generation — constituting 
 Atavism. No predisposing cause with which we are ac- 
 <]uainted exercises such a potent infiuence in the production 
 of tubercle as this: from sire to son, from dam to offspring, 
 from oreneration to generation — often an unbroken succession 
 — the iatal tendency is transmitted ; the n)ore consanguinity 
 is multiplied, the more the tendency is increased, and the 
 greater the virulence of tlu' r(\-:ulting j^i-oducts. No nnimnl 
 whose bisUny is tainted, even in the slightest degree, or in 
 Avhose system there exists the least suspicion of tubercle, 
 should be used for breeding purposes." The disease is so in- 
 ijidious in its attacks that, when you think you are all right, it 
 ma}' appear in a grand-child of what was considered a very 
 healthy animal, and outbreaks will occur years after all has 
 ])een seemingly healthy, or it may lie dormant in an apparently 
 healthy parent only to be regularly and certainly [)roduced in 
 their offspring. 
 
 Dr. J. H. Stickney, of Boston, one of our best men, and 
 ii graduate of human as well as veterinary medicine, tells me 
 of an interesting case in point in western Massachusetts. 
 A client of his had sold a young bull, with "a long pedigree'' 
 at "a long price," and before being delivered the youngster 
 had deveUjped a slight cough. Upon Dr. Stickney's attention 
 being called to the case, he at once pronounced it tuberculosis. 
 The dam of the bull was shown him, and after a critical exam- 
 ination of her, the Doctor failed to discover the slightest 
 
216 
 
 indication of disease about her, but when he came to examine- 
 the grand-dam, who had been purchased at one of the "New 
 York sales," he found her lungs and glands to be thoroughly 
 invested with tubercle. This aroused the suspicion of the 
 owner that the animal possessed the hereditary taint when 
 he purchased her in New York, and upon ascertaining from 
 what herd the animal was contributed to the sale, he visited 
 the farm, only to find his suspicions well grounded, and that 
 tuberculous animals were regularly disposed of whenever the 
 primary symptoms became apparent. These men are always 
 on the alert with regard to animals they breed, and are always 
 anxious to dispose of them whenever they show any suspicious 
 or morbid symptoms. In this way "suspects" find their way 
 into sound herds, only to communicate to them the germs of 
 the transmissible diseases with which they are affected. 
 
 Professor Law, of Cornell University, in his report to the 
 Department of Agriculture, of the contagious diseases of our 
 domestic animals, says that "twenty, thirty, and even fifty 
 per cent of cei'tain herds that supply New York City with 
 milk are aftected with this disease. In some country dis- 
 tricts can be shown large herds with ninet}' per cent subjects 
 of tuberculosis." 
 
 Some startling discoveries have also recently been made by 
 the State "board of health" at San Francisco, California. 
 
 The "board" accompanied by a veterinary surgeon, inspected 
 ten or a dozen dairies reported to them, and froni one of them 
 a cow suffering from consumption was purchased for the pur- 
 pose of experiment. Dr. E. V. Hopkins, who is regarded 
 as a microscopic specialist of high reputation, was engaged tO' 
 make examination upon the milk of the consumptive animal. 
 "The analysis was made," explained the doctor, "with a view- 
 to discovering whether the bacilli, or the consumptive disease 
 germs, are found in the milk of the diseased am'mal. If these 
 germs are found in the milk, then the disease is capable of 
 being transmitted to the persons who use the milk. The cow 
 was brought to me on December 1st, I think, and we kept 
 
217 
 
 her about two weeks. I made several experiments during 
 that time, as these will indicate" — exhil)itingaboxotmicro*(.-op- 
 ical ghiss slides carefully labelled. "I allowed the milk tir.st to 
 stand two days, until the cream had thoroughly risen to the 
 top. One drop of this cream sufficed to prepare four slides. 
 In order to bring the bacilli to view and distinguish them 
 from surrounding matter, it was necessary to strain them.'' 
 Dr. Hopkins here slipped one of the prepared slides, upon 
 which a drop of the milk had been dried, on his microscope 
 of 1500 magnifying power, and adjusted it for the reporters 
 eye. The milk presented an almost transparent appearance, 
 and against it as a background there were to be counted a 
 half-dozen reddish lines, perhaps an eighth of an inch long, 
 apparently. "These colored lines which you see," said Dr. 
 Hopkins, "are the disease germs of consumption. Trans- 
 mitted in the living form to a person or other living being, 
 they are liable to plant the fatal disease. The bacillus is a 
 division of the bacteria, one of the very lowest forms of liv- 
 ing vegetable life which exists in the blood, flesh and various 
 forms of animal and vegetable life. According to the most 
 advanced developments of medical science, it is held that all 
 infectious diseases are due to the presence of bacteria — each 
 disease has its representative species of the bacteria. The 
 bacillus is long and tube-like, made up of infinitesimal spores, 
 only made visible by the most powerful microscopes. Thus 
 diphtheria, typhoid fever, leprosy, consumption, cholera and 
 other contagious diseases have their separate germs which, to 
 the eye of one understanding their nature and character, are 
 recognizable and distinguishable one from the other. Other 
 diseases, such as scarlet fever, measles and erysipelas, are due 
 to micrococci, a round-celled form of bacteria. But those 
 you see in the microscope are the disease germ of consump- 
 tion, and from which the disease is developed. From all of 
 the analysis of the milk from this consumptive cow I have 
 found these bacilli." 
 
 "And would the disease l)e transmitted to those who use 
 the milk merely oy the drinking of it?" 
 
218 
 
 *'That would depend upon the health and delicacy of the 
 •organs of the person who drinks the milk. For children and 
 babies, whose stomachs are yet delicate and susceptible to dis- 
 ease, the transmission cannot be avoided. Any baby who 
 should drink this milk could not avoid being inoculated with 
 consumption. With healthy adults, whose organs are less 
 susceptible, the danger is less, though the germs will attach 
 themselves to any organ which is weak." 
 
 "How many dairies have you thus examined?" 
 
 "Five, thus far." 
 
 "And in the milk of how many did you find the bacilli of 
 consumption?" 
 
 "In four. That, of course, is a startling discovery. It is 
 but just, however, to state that I chose dairies which I 
 thought most likely to have diseased cattle." 
 
 "Was the milk that you examined taken from any one 
 .special cow ?"' 
 
 "No; I look the milk as it was delivered from door to 
 door. The dairy proprietors were informed of the discovery 
 and they have promptly separated the diseased cows from the 
 others, I am informed. Of course a cow may be in the first 
 stages of consumption and have no outward appearances and 
 yet promulgate the germs. There may be ouly one diseased 
 cow in the dairy. Yet the fact remains that after this cow's 
 iuilk has been mixed with that of many others of the herd, 
 I find in one' drop of the mixture the germs of the deadly 
 •disease." 
 
 Dr. Hopkins had also prepared microscopical slides with 
 minute portions of liver, blood, udder and lungs of the dis- 
 eased cow that had been killed. All showed the bacilli, and 
 the liver revealed a perfect mass of germ clusters. 
 
 Steele, a prominent English author, says, "Tubercle and 
 cancer are hereditary disorders, and the immature cancer or 
 tubercle elements may have been transmitted from the parent, 
 and have remained in a dormant state, until surrounding 
 conditions become favorable to the display of their full vigor. 
 This view seems to derive support from the fact that just as 
 
219 
 
 in due time each feature of development appears in the pro- 
 geny as in the parent, so tubercle appears at a fixed age, 
 which is the same in each." 
 
 Dr. Krunitz, on heredity, remarks, "After having sustained 
 •considerable losses for many years, owing to the employment 
 of phthisical animals for breeding purposes, the owner re- 
 ferred to got rid of the scourge which had so long ravaged 
 his cow-shed, by selling his bulls, and gradually' ceasing to 
 breed from cows which, until then, had been used for this 
 purpose." A remarkable case, proving the transmission of 
 'the disease from the male parent to progeny is published by 
 iZippelius. "A stock breeder purchased a bull, and with him 
 -served ten of his cows. The bull was found to be affected 
 with tuberculosis, and for this reason was killed. All the 
 calves of the ten cows which had been put to this bull had 
 eventually to be slaughtered because of this affection. The 
 ;first symptoms of the disease in the calves were manifested 
 when they passed to adult age." And so in human statistics 
 it is a fallacy to suppose that 3'outh is considered the harvest 
 time of consumption, or middle age the extreme limit of the 
 period within which the whole crop is garnered, the post- 
 mortem records of many hospitals showing that a large per- 
 centage of persons who die over sixty years of age are af- 
 flicted with pulmonary consumption ; less between the ages 
 of ten and forty, than it is between the ages of forty and 
 seventy. It is said "that forty is the old age of youth, and 
 fifty is the youth of old age." The seeds of disease being 
 sown early, the malad^'^ matures later in life. According 
 to abstracts prepared l)}' Goring, on the sanitary condition of 
 animals in Bavaria in 1878, 5052 tuberculous cattle were ap- 
 portioned as follows : 
 
 65 were less than a year old ; 
 551 were from one to three years ; 
 1730 were from three to six years ; 
 .2360 were more than six years. 
 
220 
 
 Although it is very rare that tuberculosis commences dur- 
 ing fcjetal life, yet it is notorious that a tuberculous cow trans- 
 mits to its descendants a predisposition to the disease. Wil- 
 liams sa3^s that "it is not only hereditary but congenital, and 
 I have seen a calf three months old, which had thriven well 
 until within two or three days of its death, filled with caseous, 
 calcareous and gray tubercular tumors. In this calf the whole 
 of the serous membranes were aflected, which must have been 
 formed in utero. The mother of this calf seemed a healthy 
 animal, but was of spare form and had a capricious appetite. 
 Adam relates an instance from among many others in which 
 the lesions of the disease were observed in a calf which died 
 a few hours after its birth, the mother at the time being 
 affected with tuberculosis. Semmes relates five cases of 
 phthisis which he met with in foetuses of cattle, and says 
 these cases sufficiently prove that tuberculosis may be de- 
 veloped during the embryonic period, and that it is readily 
 transmitted through heredity. Muller slaughtered a calf de- 
 rived from a tuberculosed cow. At the autopsy, several nodules 
 were found on the costal and pulmonary pleura, and the 
 lymphatic glands (greatly increased in volume) had under- 
 gone caseous degeneration. Muller concluded from these 
 facts that the disease is transmitted from mother to progeny, 
 and that the latter from the moment of birth may possess not 
 only the predisposition, but even present the patent lesions 
 of the malady. Gerlach thought that heredity had so much 
 influence in the propagation of tuberculosis, that it was suffi- 
 cient to have a few tuberculous bulls in a herd to infect the 
 whole, especially if in-and-in breeding was the rule. George 
 Fleming says that "animals descended from tubercidous par- 
 ents inherit a special predisposition to the disease. As there 
 is every reason to believe that the malady is hereditary, cattle 
 having any tendency to it should not be bred from. We may 
 specially consider, as causes inherent to the development of 
 the predisposition, the ever-increasing mass of connective 
 tissue in improved and improving breeds of cattle and pigs,. 
 
221 
 
 •fiiore and more specialized for the production of milk and fat. 
 That exaggerated activity of the vegetative life in the al)sence 
 of proportionate muscular exertion — that fatty degeneration 
 which is met with in most of the tissues of these animals — 
 does it not remind one of hot-house plants?" In human med- 
 icine an anah)gous if not identical opinion has been enter- 
 tained from the earliest times to the present day, and it is 
 indeed astonishing that in the presence of this evidence the 
 existence of a predisposition to, as well as the hereditary 
 transmission of the malady should not have been accepted 
 without discussion. Niemeyer admits the frequent occurrence 
 of an inherited disposition to pulmonary phthisis, and holds it 
 to be a cardinal fact, that the most essential element in the 
 production of phthisis is confidtudoual precUsjjosidon. The 
 contagiousness of tuberculosis has been admitted from very 
 remote times by many eminent pathologists, while others have 
 questioned or denied its existence. My experience with the 
 recent cases at Orono has greatly strengthened and confirmed 
 the conclusions to which my teachings and belief had been 
 previously directed, that the disease is both ^ontagious and 
 ^hereditary. 
 
 The Maine State Board of Health, in a concise and instruc- 
 tive circular, recently published, on the Contagious Dis- 
 eases of Animals, say that tuberculosis or the "Pearl Disease" 
 of cattle is essentially the same disease as human consump- 
 tion. It is both contagious and hereditary, but contagion, in 
 animals at least, is a greater factor in its propagation than 
 heredity. Of the domestic animals, cattle and swine show 
 the greatest predisposition to tuberculosis ; though others are 
 liable to contract the disease when exposed to its infection. 
 Between tuberculosis and pleuro-pneumonia there are many 
 points of resemblance. Both are contagious, the period of 
 incubation in tuberculosis is long, and it may be in pleuro- 
 pneumonia ; fever and the lung symptoms are common to 
 both, and the disease in both often assumes a concealed form, 
 ><3an£rerons to the remainder of the herd from the difficulty of 
 
222 
 
 its recognition. When either disease is suspected', tfie deter- 
 mination of its character should be made by the veterinary 
 surgeon. Dr. Salmon, Chief of Bureau of Animal Industry^ 
 says, "An animal may be infected by a particle of contagious- 
 matter floating in the atmosphere and so small as to be invis- 
 ible to the naked eye ; but in a few days or weeks, when the 
 period of incubation is passed, every drop of blood and every 
 particle of flesh in the infected animal may become as virulent 
 as the original infecting particle, and every breath exhaled is- 
 loaded with infectious atoms which carry disease to other 
 subjects. A diseased animal may, therefore, be looked upon 
 as a factory which goes on manufacturing and distributing 
 contagion, day and night, in enormous quantities. 
 
 Dr. Blaine, Assistant Physician to the Willard Asylum for 
 the Insane, at Willard, N. Y., has recently contributed to the 
 "Medical Record" a paper on bovine tuberculosis ; its com- 
 munication by ingestion, inhahition and hereditary transmis- 
 sions ; also its dangers to the public health, in which he gives 
 a full account of the sudden outbreak of tuberculosis, where*- 
 by the Asylum sustained a loss of nearly two hundred head' 
 of valuable Holsteins. Dr. Blaine says, "I now wish to call 
 your attention to certain clinical observations that were made 
 by myself of the herds at the Willard Asylum, extending 
 over a period of two and one-half years. During the fall of 
 1883 tuberculosis broke out in an acute form in the Asylum 
 herd, which consisted of about one hundred head of milch 
 cows and forty head of young stock, most of which were of 
 Holstein blood, and with the exception of a few head, all 
 were in excellent condition and thought to be in perfect 
 health. During the summer months, however, a number of 
 the cows were noticed coughing, which attracted some atten- 
 tion, but nothing of a serious nature was suspected until late 
 in the ftill, when those that had been noticed coughing began' 
 to emaciate, presenting in general a very bad appearance ; 
 the hair seemed dead, having lost its gloss, standing erect,, 
 cleaving from the skin. Their eyes were sunken and pre- 
 sented a heavy appearance. The animals did not move about 
 
223 
 
 and usually lingered behind on going to and from pasture^ 
 and if hurried, they seemed exhausted from want of breath. 
 My attention was called to them, and on examination I found 
 in several cases an entire absence of respiratory murmur over 
 the greater portion of either lung, and where the respiratory 
 murmur was perceptible I detected moist rales, and in places 
 the rales had assumed a resonant character, which indicated 
 consolidation. A severe diarrhoea had now developed, whicb 
 was very offensive, and the milk supply had gradually les- 
 sened for several months. Finally it was thought best to kill 
 one of the feebler ones, and ascertain the true nature of the 
 disease. 
 
 Case I. The animal chosen for examination was eijrht 
 years old, of Holstein blood, and one year previously would 
 have weighed 1,200 pounds. On the post-mortem, the animal 
 was found highly tuberculous, and there seemed to be no 
 organ in the body free from the disease. The lungs were 
 voluminous and double their normal weight. They were 
 completely adherent on either side, and the left lung on sec- 
 tion seemed to be one mass of tubercular deposit. Small 
 vomica had formed in some places, in other places the deposit 
 was calcified, and in still others, cheesy. The bronchial 
 glands were three to four times their normal size and degcn- 
 erated. Numerous tubercles the size of hazel-nuts and 
 smaller, were found upon either surface of the di.iphnigm, 
 and the liver was found at least three times its normal size 
 and contained large masses that would equal in weight several 
 pounds. On cross-section it revealed large cavities tilled with 
 a mnco-purulent mass. The bowels were covered with tuber- 
 cles, and in a state of sul>acute inflammation. All of the 
 abdominal organs wore more or less affected, also the milk- 
 bag, which contained sevei'al large deposits, some of which 
 were calcified, and others softened and in a semi-purulent 
 state. All the glands throughout the body were enlarged, 
 and in places degenerated. 
 
 Case II was that of a Holstein six years old, much ema- 
 ciated, and suffering from a chronic diarrhoea. No respiratory 
 
224 
 
 •murmur was heard over the right side of chest- wall except at 
 the apex. General enlargement of the superficial lymphatic 
 glands, also of the sub-maxillary and thyroid. Post-mortem 
 examination : Lungs completely adherent on either side, 
 and differing in no respect from those in Case No. 1. The 
 lungs, with the heart and deposit intact, were removed and 
 weighed, which weight equalled thirty-nine and one-half 
 pounds. Deducting the weight of the normal lung and heart 
 intact, we find about twenty-four pounds of tubercular de- 
 ;posit. The liver was double its normal size, and on section 
 large quantities of muco-purulent fluid escaped ; the mesen- 
 teric glands were degenerated, and the bowels were com- 
 pletely studded with tubercles about the size of peas. The 
 milk-bUg contained one large deposit between its two lobes 
 which was calcified. The finding of these two animals so 
 badly diseased, there being others that were failing and man- 
 ifesting similar symptoms, naturally created a great amount 
 of anxiety on the part of the medical superintendent. Dr. 
 ■Chapin, who requested that I should make an examination of 
 the whole herd. On making such an examination, twenty- 
 four were found manifesting symptoms of the same disease, 
 besides several that were considered questionable. Finding 
 so many diseased, they being the property of the State, it 
 was thought best to seek advice from one of our State veteri- 
 narians, as to what means were best to adopt. Professor 
 Law, of Cornell University, was sent for. After making 
 careful examinations of the herd, he reported that twenty-six 
 were diseased, and that he considered several suspicious, as 
 they manifested some symptoms of the disease, although he 
 was unable to detect anything abnormal on auscultation. He 
 advised the killing of all those that were diseased, the isola- 
 tion of those that were considered doubtful, and a thorough 
 disinfection of the stables. Having in the herd a full-blooded 
 Holstein bull, it was considered quite essential to know if he 
 was aflfected, although he had not manifested any symptoms of 
 the disease. Upon careful examination nothing abnormal 
 was detected. Professor Law's examinations were made 
 
225 
 
 March 22, 1884. Man}- of the diseased animals remained in 
 the herd for several weeks, when the herd was again exam- 
 ined I)}' myself. I found those that only a few weeks pre- 
 vious were considered doubtful had now developed positive 
 symptoms of the disease, and still others were found that 
 seemed quite suspicious. The bull, at this time, appeared 
 to be failing in flesh, but manifested no positive symptoms. 
 
 On May 22d and 2od twenty-eight of the most advanced 
 cases were killed. On examination all were found affected, 
 but not all to the same degree. Tlie organs principally af- 
 fected were the serous membranes, the lungs, liver, bowels, 
 and the milk-bag in many cases. A number of them were 
 affected to an equally great degree as the two cases I have al- 
 ready reported. Examination was again made of the herd on 
 June 10th, and others were found manifesting the usual symp- 
 toms ; the bull was again examined and it was very apparent 
 that he was affected, although he had not manifested any 
 cough, but he was rapidly losing flesh. He was then weighed 
 and was found to weigh 2,456 pounds. He was again weighed 
 on July 10th, and his weight was then 2,290 pounds, and as 
 at this time it was very evident that he was also affected, it 
 was decided to kill him. On post-mortem we found a large 
 deposit in the central portion of the left lung, and numerous 
 small tubercles upon the left pleura. The bronchial glands 
 were greatly enlarged, and on cross section were found calci- 
 Hed. There were many tubercles upon the peritoneum and 
 bowels. The liver in this case seemed free from disease. 
 Upon the glans penis were several small tubercles, and in 
 one place it appeared as though several had coalesced and had 
 broken down, leaving a cicatrix. Had this been ulcerated, 
 one might have thought it a soft chancre. 
 
 Leaving the herd at present, I wish to call your attention 
 to the calves that were born during the winter and spring of 
 1883-84. Writers tell us that it is not an uiuisual occurrence 
 for animals well advanced in tuberculosis to abort. This 
 seems to be true, as such was the case in this herd. I 
 
 15 
 
226 
 
 observed that eight calves were prematurely born, two of 
 which required assistance at birth, as the mothers were much 
 exhausted. One of the two that was removed was in about 
 the eighth mouth of gestation. This foetus on examination 
 was found saturated with tubercles, some of which were as 
 large as peas, and on drawing a knife across them they were 
 found calcified. Tubercles were found in the liver, bowels, 
 diaphragm and chest- wall, there being none observed upon 
 the lungs. The mother of this calf was killed some weeks 
 afterward and was found highly tuberculous, the disease be- 
 ing well advanced to the third stage, or stage of suppuration. 
 
 No. 2 was from a diseased mother, also in about the eighth 
 month of gestation. On examination I found the liver, dia- 
 phragm and bowels quite thickly studded, but the tubercles 
 were much smaller than in the preceding case. Of the other 
 six prematurely born, I was able to examine only two, as the 
 other four had been destroyed before I was acquainted of the 
 fact. One of the two, however, that I did examine was found 
 to have a tuberculous liver. 
 
 During the winters and springs of 1883-84 and 1884-85, 
 fifty-three calves were born to the herd, and each one was 
 examined with reference to the disease. Twenty-nine of the 
 number were found tuberculous in some of the viscera. The 
 greater number of the calves were killed witkin live weeks 
 after birth, and the whole number before the expiration of 
 four months. I will only call your attention to the most in- 
 teresting cases. One calf killed at the age of five weeks was 
 found highly tuberculous. The liver was double the nor- 
 mal size and covered with tubercles. On cross section it was 
 found to contain a large vomica, filled with at least one pint 
 of fluid of a muco-purulent character. Tubercles were also 
 found upon the pleural surface of the left lung ; also an ex- 
 tensive deposit in the apex of the same lung. The mesen- 
 teric glands were enlarged and cheesy. The bowels were 
 thickly studded and in a state of subacute inflammation. This 
 calf had suffered from a severe diarrhoea for several days, and 
 had failed considerably in flesh. 
 
227 
 
 The mother of this calf was killed shortly afterward, and 
 was found badl}' diseased. Among the organs aftected was 
 the milk-bag, which contained a large tuberculous abscess. 
 In this case does it seem possible for the disease to have been 
 acquired wholly after l)irth? To my mind it does not seem 
 possible that the disease could have developed with sufficient 
 rapidity to produce an abscess of the liver in such a limited 
 time. However, I am of the opinion that the intestinal le- 
 sions were produced, to a great extent, from the milk of its 
 mother, as undoubtedly the milk must have contained ele- 
 ments of the disease. 
 
 In another calf, seven weeks old, the left lung was adher- 
 ent to the ehest-wall at the apex, where there was a large 
 tubercular deposit. Also there were many small tubercles 
 upon the lungs and in other places. The liver and bowels 
 (contained many tubercles of the size of peas, and on cross 
 section were found in a state of cheesy degeneration. In the 
 remaining cases the lesions were not as marked, but the dis- 
 ease was none the less apparent. 
 
 You now have the history of the herd up to elune, 1884, 
 and we find that nearly one-half of the herd of milch cows 
 has been disposed of, all that were supposed to be diseased 
 having been killed. The remainder of the herd were ob- 
 served from time to time, and examinations repeated every 
 twenty to thirty days ; and upon each examination new cases 
 were discovered, Avhich were inmiediately removed from the 
 herd, as it was thought they could be fattened and made use 
 of. 
 
 The sorting out and feeding continued for several months, 
 and at the time of killing many had not gained at all, while 
 others had taken on considerable llesh ; but upon killing only 
 five were found fit for use, and four of these were slightly 
 diseased in some of the viscera. 
 
 During the spring of 1885 a number of young heifers, 
 which had been kept upon another portion of the farm, were 
 with calf by the bull killed in June previously. Before put- 
 ting them with the old herd they were examined, and many 
 
228 
 
 of them were found diseased. It was deemed advisable to kill 
 them. The calves of these heifers were all diseased, the dis- 
 ease in one calf being traced directly to the bull, as the mother 
 was found unquestionably healthy. The remainder of the 
 young herd which had been exposed to the disease were put 
 with the remaining portion of the milch cows, and the com- 
 bined herds now numbered forty head. The examinations 
 were still continued from time to time, during the summer 
 and fall of 1885, and occasionally one was found manifesting 
 the usual symptoms of the disease. This procedure was con- 
 tinued until the spring of 1886, when it was thought advis- 
 able to feed the remainder of the herd. During the past 
 summer all were killed except ten, which have been killed 
 during the past month, and in nearly every case disease could 
 be found in some of the viscera, and some Avere badly dis- 
 eased, as I will show you from specimens that I have here. 
 The specimen that I wish to show you is very interesting, 
 inasmuch as it shows that one is not able, at all times, to tell 
 whether or not the animal is diseased. You will observe that 
 the disease, in this case, is confined wholly to the bronchial 
 glands, there being no other organs affected — that is, as far 
 as I have been able to determine. Auscultation of the lungs 
 in this case revealed nothing abnormal, but the superficial 
 lymphatic glands were not enlarged, and the animal had man- 
 ifested a cough. The bronchial gland, in a healthy cow, is 
 about four or five inches long, about one inch wide, and one- 
 half inch in thickness. Here we have a specimen, removed 
 from a Holstein cow nine years old, in which we find the 
 gland is about ten to twelve inches in length and nearly six 
 inches in thickness. This, on section, we shall find in some 
 places calcified, and in others cheesy. I also have other 
 specimens here, removed from another case, in which no 
 disease could be found except in the glands, and these with- 
 out apparent enlargement. 
 
 During the winter of 1883 the Asylum purchased a full- 
 blooded, registered, Holstein l>ull-calf, from one of the leading 
 breeding firms of this country. This bull was kept from the 
 
229 
 
 herd until old enough for breeding purposes, and then only 
 came in contact with the herd as occasion required. This 
 animal thrived until April last, when I noticed that he began 
 to manifest symptoms of the disease. He was examined at 
 frequent intervals during the sunmier, and each examination 
 confirmed the previous diagnosis. lie was killed on Novem- 
 ber 16th, last. Previous to being killed he weighed nearly 
 two thousand pounds. On post-mortem I found the left sub- 
 maxillary gland enlarged and suppurating, the thyroid gland 
 enlarged and calcified, and several deposits in the left lung 
 about the size of walnuts ; also tubercles upon the peritoneum 
 and bowels. The liver, in this case, was free from disease. 
 The glands and i)ortions of the lungs I have here for your 
 inspection. 
 
 The only possible objection that could be raised regarding 
 the care of these animals was that of ventilation. The stables 
 were ke[)t scrupulously clean, being washed out daily, and 
 there were no cess-pools about the barns or yards. The 
 barns are situated upon a side-hill, thus affording the best 
 possible drainage. 
 
 Their food was of the best of hay, corn fodder, bran and 
 vegetables. In the spring of 1884 all of the animals were 
 removed from the barns and put in pasture, and o[)en sheds 
 built for their protection. 
 
 During the followiufr winter the animals were couHned in 
 the barns only during the time of feeding and milking, they being 
 out during the day and protected at night by sheds open on 
 one side. 
 
 .Vlso in the breeding of this herd of stock there was the 
 ijreatest amount of vifi^ilance exercised in order to avoid in- 
 breeding. Frequent changes were made in the I)ulls; new 
 cows were bought from time to time of the farmers through- 
 out the countr}^ and these crossed with the Holstein bulls, 
 and at the time of the outbreak of the disease about one- 
 third were animals that had been purchased. In my mind it 
 does not seem possible that the disease, or dyscrasia, had 
 been inherited in all cases. Therefore, if the disease was not 
 
230 
 
 inherited in all cases, it must necessarily have been acquired ; 
 and if acquired, through what channel did the disease enter 
 the animals' system ? 
 
 There appear to be only two channels in which it could 
 have entered, the one by inhalation, the other by ingestion. 
 In order to prove that the disease is communicated by inhala- 
 tion, we have to resort to experiments, but by ingestion we 
 have many striking examples in which it is plainly shown 
 that the disease is acquired by the use of milk and meat of 
 tuberculous animals. In proof that the disease may be ac- 
 quired by the ingestion of tuberculous substances, allow me 
 to call your attention to the Asylum herd of swine, which 
 numbered nearly three hundred head. These animals were 
 kept in different yards. In one, the breeding sows ; in 
 another, the half-grown pigs ; and in the third yard, which 
 was adjoining the slaughter house, were kept the large hogs 
 which were being fattened. The hogs in this latter pen had 
 access to the offiil from the slaughter house, where a number 
 of tuberculous cows had been killed. Later in the fall a 
 number of the large fat hogs died suddenly in full strength, 
 and on post-mortem were found highly tuberculous. The 
 disease, however, did not present the same pathological con- 
 ditions as in the cows. The disease seemed more especially 
 confined to the abdominal viscera and the glandular system, 
 the lungs being rarely affected. In those cases that died 
 suddenly I found a tubercular peritonitis, to which was attri- 
 buted the cause of death. During the killing season many 
 were found diseased, there being metastatic abscesses in dif- 
 ferent portions of the body, but more especially in the side ; 
 and in the sows the rudiments of the milk-bag were often the 
 seat of abscess. Also the joints were frequently affected, 
 many of the hogs, both large and small, became lame. Dur- 
 ing the winter a number of them became partially paralyzed in 
 their hind parts. The paralysis progressed, and finally they 
 were unable to use their hind limbs at all, and for several 
 days three of them moved about, walking upon their fore 
 limbs and dragging their hind parts. Still they were fat and 
 
231 
 
 seemed to eat equally as well as the others. Finally they 
 were killed, and on post-mortem the bodies of the vertebrae 
 in different portions of the column were found to have under- 
 gone caseous transformation. The cord at these points was 
 softened, and in some cases completely obliterated. 
 
 After the killing of all the swine that had access to the of- 
 fal, and disinfecting the yards, we have since had no more 
 disease in the herd." 
 
 There is a remarkable similarity in the symptoms and post- 
 mortem appearances of the Willard herd and that of the 
 State College, and proves conclusively that any other course 
 than that adopted at Orono, in the disposal of their cases, 
 would have been suicidal to the best interests of the State. 
 AVith the comparative freedom from disease we now enjoy, it 
 would seem like inviting disaster for us to hesitate, or par- 
 le}^ longer, to recommend immediate action on the part of the 
 proper authorities, to stamp out every vestige of disease re- 
 maining in our State, and in this respect, as in all others, to 
 live up to the proud motto emblazoned on our "State shield" 
 and still continue to "lead the way." Fleming says, "The 
 intiuence of contagion on the propagation of tuberculosis has 
 been affirmatively solved, for we have furnished ample proof 
 of its hereditary transmission ; this transmission being nothing 
 more than the infection of the ovum or foetus through the 
 medium of the parents. The reality of the infective action 
 of the disease has already been demonstrated as well as its 
 transmissibility from one individual to another in the special 
 case of ascendant or descendant. As there is, however, a 
 difference between the transmission of a disease from the pro- 
 ducing animal to the product, on the one hand, and from an 
 individual to another simultaneously existing, on the other 
 hand, we are compelled to draw a distinction between hercdi- 
 taiy transmission and contagion, properly speaking; and wc 
 caniiot forbear from treating, in a special manner, of the con- 
 veyance of this disease through actual contact, that is, from 
 one individual to another, both existing at the same time and 
 enjoying life essentially independent of each other. The 
 
232 
 
 morbific principle may arrive in the organism by the respira- 
 tory or the digestive tract ; the inspired air, the food, or the 
 drink may be the medium ; and the contagion may also be 
 transplanted by means of the generative organs (through 
 copulation) or by accidental means, by wounds." Stahl has 
 witnessed tuberculosis develop in five bulls in one stable, 
 which were kept for the service of a commune. These bulls 
 were not related in any way by parentage, and he attributes 
 the outbreak of the disease to the purchase of a tuberculous 
 bull, which, by its presence, iafected the others. 
 
 Renner reports that a pregnant cow, newly purchased, 
 was placed beside a tuberculous cow. The calf produced by 
 the former was apparently healthy at birth, but five or six 
 weeks afterwards it was attacked by shiverings, fever, fits of 
 coughing and great dyspntea. The tuberculous cow was 
 killed, and soon after the calf showed evident symptoms of 
 tuberculosis. In 1864, Villemin, with a view to study the 
 infective action of human tuberculosis, made some important 
 experiments that produced a profound sensation in the scien- 
 tific world, and came to the conclusion that tuberculosis is an 
 infectious and specific malady, capable of being transmitted 
 from men to animals, and from one man to another. A Ger- 
 man veterinarian, Albert, contributed a very thoughtful and 
 interesting paper in 1880, on the tuberculosis of cattle as an 
 infective disease, and says, "Although heredity is unques- 
 tionably a very important cause in the generation of this dis- 
 ease among cattle, still it does not suffice to explain the great 
 extension which the same acquires among them ; especially is 
 it insufficient in answering for the eruption of the disease 
 among cattle in stables where no breeding takes place, or 
 where the 3^oung animals are brought in from other farms. 
 In such stables other causes must be brought into action, and 
 these are the transmission of the disease from one animal to 
 another. I have observed that when there is in a stable one 
 individual which contains in its organism the conditions 
 necessary to the extension of the disease — tubercular pro- 
 cess in the lungs — the disease extends to the other animals 
 
233 
 
 in the same stable which have been there for a sufficient 
 period." He cites a case on a farm where were kei)t from 
 "twenty-four to twenty-six head of cattle. In 18«i4, the owner 
 bought a calf to bring up, the mother of which died a few 
 years later of tuberculosis. This calf developed very poorly 
 for the first two years of its life, and was killed in the fall of 
 1869. In the course of the following winter, many of the 
 cattle began to cough, and among them, two, A and B, so 
 severely that my services were requested. I found all the 
 animals in an apparently healthy condition ; only A and B 
 were noticed to cough. At this time 1 knew nothing of the 
 breeding, or the phenomena seen in the above mentioned 
 calf, which had been slaughtered. 
 
 .VII the animals on the farm coughed during the winter of 
 1^70-71, at which time the two cows, A and B, began to 
 emaciate so nmch that it was considered advisable to kill them. 
 The autopsy revealed the general characteristics of tubercular 
 l)neumonia, and tuberculosis of other organs. Basing my 
 opinions upon the previously mentioned experience, I made 
 no hesitation in pronouncing all the cattle in this stable that 
 coughed afflicted with tuberculosis, and I advised the owner 
 to get rid of them all." Chauveau has already observed that 
 heifers which feed out of the same trough become tuberculous 
 whenever a phthisical animal is found among them. Grad 
 quotes evidence to prove in the most conclusive manner that 
 not only is the disease communicable by cohabitation of healthy 
 with diseased cattle, but that stalls and stables may become 
 so contaminated by animals suffering from tuberculosis, that 
 they infect sound cattle which afterwards inhabit them, until 
 thoroughly disinfected. Toussaint, Professor at the Toulouse 
 Veterinary School, made numerous experiments to demonstrate 
 the contagiousness of tuberculosis. For these investigations, 
 which required thousands of animals, he employed pigs, rab- 
 bits and cats, as the disease is more surely and rapidly de- 
 veloped in them. The fluid expressed from the lungs of a 
 tuberculous cow was that which he employed. He injected 
 into four rabbits ten drops of this fluid, which was nearly 
 
234 
 
 transparent. He afterwards heated the fluid to a tem- 
 perature of 58 degrees for ten minutes in a water bath, and 
 inocuhited four pigs and four rabbits with it. All these 
 animals became tuberculous, and the four which had been 
 inoculated with the heated material perished even more 
 rapidly than the others. Three rabbits were inoculated at the 
 base of the ear, Avith the transparent mucus that flowed from 
 the nose of a phthisical cow. In about two weeks there 
 appeared a tuberculous nodule at the seat of inoculation, and 
 the lymphatic glands were turneiied. Seventy days after 
 inoculation the rabbits were killed, and in their lungs were 
 found tubercles, the majority of which were gray and some 
 were already undergoing caseation. 
 
 That the sputa from people afllicted with tubercular con- 
 sumption contains elements capable of infection, has been 
 placed beyond all doubt. Experiments made by Dr. Tap- 
 peimer, and published in Virchow's Archives, are of great 
 interest. The animals experimented upon were made to 
 breathe for several hours daily in a chamber in the air of 
 which tine particles of phthisical sputem were suspended. 
 The sputem having been mixed with water, the mixture was 
 atomized by a steam atomizer. In all cases the sputa were 
 from persons with cavitcrs (vomica) in their lungs. Dogs 
 alone were employed in the experiments, since they very 
 rarely sulfer from tuberculosis. The result was, that of 
 eleven animals experimented on, with one doubtful excep- 
 tion, after a period varying from twenty-five to forty- 
 five days, all, being killed, presented well developed miliary 
 tubercles in both lungs ; and in most of the cases tubercles 
 were present to a smaller extent in the kidneys, and in some 
 cases also in the liver and spleen. Dr. Reiche of Berlin 
 sums up his observations on the infectiousness of the breath 
 of persons afflicted with tuberculosis as follows : "In these 
 cases the disease was transmitted to ten children by a nurse 
 who had the habit of sucking at and blowing into the mouths 
 of such little ones as were born asphytic. There was no as- 
 certainable disposition to tuberculosis in any of the ten chil- 
 
235 
 
 dren. All these children were })iought into the world by the 
 nurse Sanger, between April, 1875, juid Muy. 187«i. This 
 nurse suffered from tubercular consumption at the time. In 
 July, 1875, an examination of her lungs revealed cavities in 
 the same, and she raised purulent ichorous sputa. She died 
 from the disease in July, 187(i. Nurse Sanger had the habit 
 of removinir the mucus from the babies' mouths by means 
 of suction with her own ; and in general treated children in a 
 manner which rendered it possible for the expired air from 
 her own lungs to get into theirs by kissing, etc." 
 
 From the clinical observations already cited as well as the 
 numerous experiments which have been made, tending, as 
 they do, to establish the infections character of the malady 
 under consideration, it evidently results that tuberculosis is a 
 contagious malady, equal in infectiousness to glanders and 
 contagious pleuro-pneumonia. Inoculation has also demon- 
 strated that the tubercular matter preserves its virulence 
 through three or four removes; and successful inoculations 
 have been made with tubercular matter from a patient wh(^ 
 had been dead for thirty-six hours, and with sputa which had 
 been in a dried condition for twenty days. 
 
 When we come to consider the transmission of the disease 
 through the use of milk, we reach a point of vital importance 
 to every man, woman and child in the connminity, and the 
 conviction that the consumption of the milk of phthisical 
 cattle constitutes a veritable danger is gradually penetrating 
 society, and daily gaining ground. The lirst intimation that 
 some infectious elements were contained in the milk of cows 
 having this disease is due to Gerlach, the most noted (jf Ger- 
 man veterinarians, and late director of the Ro3'al Veterinary 
 Institute at Berlin. Having a cow afflicted with tuberculosis, 
 that still gave milk, it was resolved to use the same to test 
 the question whether the milk from such a cow is capable of 
 producing a similar disease in young animals when fed upon 
 it. The cow was seven or eight years old, much emaciated, 
 respiration difficult, and had a rough, weak cough. After a 
 lapse of three months the cow was killed. The emaciated 
 
236 
 
 condition had gradually increased, the milk-secretion likewise 
 diminishing ; although the animal received all the nourish- 
 ment she could consume. The autopsy disclosed numerous 
 tubercles of various dimensions upon the inner thoracic 
 walls, the diaphragm and mediastinum. The lungs were 
 voluminous and double the normal weight. A healthy, well- 
 nourished calf, eight days old, was fed with the milk from 
 the above-mentioned cow, for a period extending over one 
 and two-thirds months. Neither phenomena indicating the 
 presence of disease, nor disturbance of the nutritive functions 
 were observable. The calf was killed one hundred days after 
 the experimental feeding began, and upon post-mortem, tuber- 
 cles were found in the lungs, and miliary tubercles were seen 
 in the loose interlobular tissue. The bronchial lymph-glands 
 were much enlarged and inwardly disturbed by many puru- 
 lent and caseous cavities. 
 
 Gerlach says, "There is every reason to prohibit the use of 
 milk from cows affected with tuberculosis, and especially for 
 infants, who mainlj^ rely upon this fluid for their subsistence, 
 and whose powers of absorption are very active." 
 
 The milk from a tuberculous cow had been used for some 
 time in a cooked condition, but the cow finally became so bad 
 that it was decided to give the milk to the hogs, but uncooked. 
 The farmer's wife noticed that the young pigs (four or five 
 months old) fed upon this milk did not appear to thrive well, 
 and as, in the course of a few weeks, three died, I was re- 
 quested to make an examination of the last one. I found the 
 pig much emaciated. The mesenteric glands were enlarged, 
 and found filled with tuberculous mass, with tubercles in the 
 liver. In the course of a few weeks the remaining pigs of 
 the litter also died, and were found tuberculous on being 
 examined. 
 
 The following case of transmission of bovine tuberculosis 
 to man is related by Dr. Stang of Amborach : A boy, five 
 years old, apparentl}' strong in constitution and descended 
 from healthy parents, whose progenitors were exempt from 
 hereditary disease, was attacked with scrofula, and died in 
 
237 
 
 four weeks from miliary tuberculosis of the lungs and enor- 
 mous hypertrophy of the mesenteric glands. When making 
 the autopsy, it was accidentally ascertained that some time 
 before, the parents had to destroy a cow, which, according 
 to the testimony of the veterinar}' surgeon, was aftected with 
 pulmonary phthisis. The animal had been a good milch cow, 
 and for a long time the boy had received a quantity of the 
 milk, immediately after it was drawn. 
 
 At the annual meeting of the National Veterinary Associa- 
 tion, held in London, in 1888, Dr. Hopkin said : "I had an 
 assistant who came to me from one of the islands on the coast 
 of Scotland. The family from which he was derived was 
 healthy and strong; but when two of his sisters were young, 
 the herd of cattle became aftected with tuberculosis. These 
 girls were fed upon the milk of these cattle. The two 
 brothers, who were more fond of whiskey than milk, are 
 still hale and healthy — the sisters are lying in their graves, 
 victims to tuberculosis." 
 
 Dr. Frank S. Billings of the University of Nebraska, one 
 of our best pathological specialists, says, "This question of the 
 specific infection of milk from tuberculous cows is no trifling 
 matter : on the contrary, it is one of life and death. How 
 many thousand babies are yearly brought up on the bottle 
 with cow's milk? All the fond parents ask is, that the milk is 
 from one cow. This guaranteed, they appear to feel perfectly 
 satisfied. No one seems yet to have thought that a trust- 
 worthy and expert guarantee of the hygienic condition of the 
 cow giving the milk was necessary. We make great de- 
 mands, and get terribly excited about the purity of our water 
 supply. We spend millions of dollars to keep the fountains 
 pure and to prevent all foreign admixtures on its passage to 
 us. Is it not as much our duty to examine into the purity 
 of the fountains from which comes our milk supply? We 
 cannot but repeat our assertion that every State board of 
 health should be liberally supplied with funds to be used ex- 
 clusively for experimental purposes, and in every State there 
 should be a station for such purposes." These cases should 
 
238 
 
 be more than sufficient to call the attention of every reflecting 
 man and woman to the fact that tuberculosis is not only a dis- 
 ease, the disposition to which is transmissible from parent to 
 ofi'spring, both human and animal, but that it is, under cer- 
 tain circumstances, a highl}^ contagious and infectious disease. 
 They tell us in warning words that we must not only be most 
 careful in selecting our partner for life, but in the selection 
 of a nurse for children, and, when necessary, the cow from 
 which we are to give them milk. Our own State board of 
 health says : ' 'Feeding experiments have conclusively shown 
 that tuberculosis may be transmitted by means of the milk 
 and flesh of diseased animals. Therefore prevention has to re- 
 gard both the danger to other animals and to man. The 
 milk from cows with this disease, even in its earliest stages, 
 or when suspected, should never be used for human food. 
 The flesh should never be used unless the disease is in its 
 earliest stages and is so localized that the tubercular growth 
 can be entirely removed." 
 
 Fleming says, "The circumstances which may preserve man- 
 kind from the harmful action of the milk are, happily, more 
 easy to realize than those which should completely guarantee 
 us from the danger likely to be incurred from consuming the 
 flesh of tuberculous animals. It is, nevertheless, true that 
 we do not know the special character which would allow us 
 to distinguish, either by the naked eye, or by the aid of 
 chemical or ordinar}^ physical analysis, healthy from infected 
 milk, while, on the other hand, obligatory search for the tuber- 
 cle bacillus in all milk would be an excessive and impracticable 
 measure. To prohibit the sale of milk of cows presenting 
 symptoms of tubercular phthisis would be without result, the 
 milk not being subjected to sufficient control, so far as its ori- 
 gin is concerned. The recommendation not to use the milk 
 until it has lieen boiled has more likelihood of being observed, 
 and is more certain of success than that relative to cooking 
 the flesh. Milk is a fluid which heats uniformly, so that we 
 may admit that in boiled milk every specific principle of 
 tuberculosis, as well as the virus, is destroyed. In addition, 
 
239 
 
 the milk from different animals is usually mixed, so that the 
 activity of the virus in virulent milk is in this way attenuated 
 by its commingling with healthy milk. This attenuation may 
 be so great that the mixture is altogether inoffensive. Lastly, 
 it should be recognized that the milk of every tuberculous 
 cow is not fatally charged with the contagious principle of 
 tuberculosis ; although we cannot deny that the milk of such 
 cattle should be very infective, if the disease is localized in 
 the udder (mammary glands.) Degive, professor at the 
 Brussels Veterinary School, relates the case of a cow which 
 had the localizations of tuberculosis in the mamma. "A 
 brown cow, of a delicate constitution, l)ut a good milker, was 
 attacked by a violent inflammation of the left half of the 
 udder, which resisted every kind of treatment. The udder 
 increased in size, and the secretion of milk was completely 
 suspended. In a few weeks the cow commenced to cough 
 and to breathe with difficulty — phenomena which were soon 
 complicated with manifestations of fever. The diagnosis was 
 pulmonary inflammation. The animal was killed, and on ex- 
 amination of its body there were found tuberculous nodosities 
 on the pleura, as well as in the udder, where they were in 
 great number." These symptoms conform precisely with 
 those exhibited in the case of "Helen Hart, "(No. 5 P. M.,) 
 and she is the dam of two of the bulls sold from the College 
 farm. It results from the observations collected up to the 
 present time, and from a consideration of the natural condi- 
 tion of things, that the dairies which supply milk warm from 
 the cow, intended to be given directly to children, offer the 
 greatest danger to the public health. In these establishments 
 they do not rear the cows they employ, l)ut buy them, always 
 endeavoring to obtain those which yield the most niilk, and 
 these they milk excessively. In regard to the use of the 
 meat, Zundle is of the opinion that, so far as injury or danger 
 from the use of such tlesh is concerned, uj) to the present time 
 only theoretical considerations, based on imperfect experi- 
 ments which are opposed to the facts derived Ironi close ob- 
 servation, have been invoked. The discovery of Koch, he 
 
240 
 
 adds, shows that the parasite of tuberculosis is only met with 
 in the pathological productions characteristic of this malady, 
 and are not diffused, like certain other of the infectious dis- 
 eases, throughout the whole of the juices of the body, nor 
 yet of the blood ; and it is for these reasons that the bacilli 
 are not found in the flesh. As a result, says this learned 
 principal veterinary surgeon of Alsace Lorraine, it follows 
 that the practice hitherto pursued should be in no way modi- 
 fied, and that, as in the past, only the flesh of wasted and 
 wholly infected animals should be interdicted for food ; the 
 utilization of that which is derived from cattle less diseased 
 may be allowed, if it be recommended to consume it onl}' 
 after it has been well cooked. Some Short-Horn steers, 
 slaughtered at Orono, which had been kept for experimental 
 feeding, were as "handsome and wholesome" as any Chicago 
 or eastern beef, and I regarded it as a sacrifice of just so 
 much marketable product, when they were put into the 
 trench and destroyed. These steers had gained a pound and 
 a half a day, from the time they were calves, and the lesions 
 in them were very slight, mostly confined to the maxillary 
 and lymphatic glands. 
 
 "Post-Mortem" Notes of College Herd. 
 
 Pansy, I. (No. 1.) 
 
 Cyst in centre of left lung. Apex affected, right filled 
 with miliary tubercles. Age 8 years. Bred in Bowdoin. 
 Dam, Model. Produce, Mildred, (No. 2, P. M.), Hyacinthe, 
 (No. 3), and a bull calf that was affected and coughed when 
 but three days old. 
 
 Mildred, I. (No. 2.) 
 
 Adhesions of both lungs to costal pleura, badly afi'ected. 
 Age'iA j-ears. Bred in Bowdoin. Dam, Pansy, (No. 1). 
 Produce, "Mildretta of Oi-ono," (No. 4) and bull sold, now 
 coming 3 years old, both bred on College farm. 
 
241 
 
 ITyacinthe^ I. (No. 3.) 
 
 lioth lungs aficcteil. Tubercles in right. Age 4 years. 
 IJred in Bowdoin. Dam, Pansy, (No. 1). Produce, "Gray 
 Nose," (No. 47). 
 
 Mild reiki oj Orotio. (No. 4.) 
 
 Atlected with tubercles. Age 1 year. Dam, Mildred, 
 (No. 2). Bred on College farm. 
 
 ''Helen Bart:' (No. 5.) 
 
 lioth lungs and mammary glands afleeted, so that her milk 
 was tainted. Age 8 years. Bred on College farm. Dam, 
 "Ilepsy Ilarl." Grand dam, Hebe. Produce, heifer calf, 
 (No. ()), and two bulls, coming 3 and 4 years old, both bred 
 on C>)llege farm. 
 
 ireleu's Calf. (No. G.) 
 
 A fleeted with miliary deposits in both lungs. Age 8 
 months. Dam, "Helen Hart," (No. 5). Bred on College 
 farm. 
 
 ''Ilesta Ilarl of Orono" (No. 7.) 
 
 Afleeted with tubercles and cough. Age 1 year. Dam, 
 "Hesta Hart." Grand dam, "Hebe." Bred on College 
 farm. "Hesta Hart" died in giving birth to "Hesta Hart of 
 Orono." 
 
 "//u//o Pauline." (No. 8.) 
 
 Atlected with tubercle in right lung size of hen's Q^g. Age 
 7 years. Bred on College farm. Dam, "Pride of Lachine," 
 Grand dam, Hebe. "Hugo Pauline" was sold from the herd 
 when one week old, passed through several hands, and was 
 re-purchased by Mr. Gowell in January, 1885. 
 
 Collie, I. (No. 9.) 
 
 Right lung affected with tubercles. Age 9 years. Bred 
 in Winthrop. Produce, Tinney, (No. 10), and Collie, 2nd, 
 (No. 13). 
 
 Tinney, I. (No. 10.) 
 
 P>()th lungs affected with tubercles. Age 7 years. Bred 
 in Winthrop. Dam, Collie, (No. 9). Produce, Eizeletta 
 
 16 
 
242 
 
 (No. 11), Tinetta, (No. 14), Tinney's calf, (No. 15) and 
 bull sold now coming 3 ye.ars old. 
 
 Eizeletta, I. (No. 11.) 
 
 Tubercle (size of hen's Qgg) in right lung. Left lung 
 affected. Age 5 years. Bred in Winthrop. Dam, Tinney, 
 (No. 10). Produce, Blanch (No. 12) and "bull calf" 
 (No. 16^.) 
 
 Blanch. (No. 12.) 
 
 Both lungs badly affected. "Grapes" (angle-berries) and 
 abscess in right lung. Age 3 years. Bred on College farm. 
 Dam, Eizeletta, (No. 11). Produce, (No. 16) bull calf, 
 affected, coughed badly and debilitated. 
 
 ^'Collie, 2nd:' (No. 13.) 
 
 Thyroid and maxillarj' glands affected. Age 2 years. 
 Bred on College farm. Dam, Collie, (No. 9). No produce. 
 
 Tinetta. (No. 14). 
 
 Glands affected. Coughed. Age 1 year. Bred on Col- 
 lege farm. Dam, Tinney, (No. 10). 
 
 "Tmwey's Caip' (No. 15.) 
 
 Parotid glands affected, coughed badly and emaciated. 
 Age 3 months. Bred on College farm. Dam, Tinney, (No. 
 10). 
 
 '^Blanch's Calf." (No. 16.) 
 
 Glands affected, stiff neck. Age 9 months. Dam, Blanch, 
 (No. 12). Bred on College farm. 
 
 '' Eizeletta' s Oalf." (No. 16^.) 
 
 Coughed badly. Age 10 months. Dam, Eizeletta, (No. 11). 
 Bred on College farm. 
 
 Highland Belle. (No. 17.) 
 
 Badly affected in both lungs and liver. Age 6 years. 
 Bred at Bowdoinham. Purchased in 1882. Produce, Edith, 
 (No. 18) and bull, sold, now coming 3 years old. Bred on 
 the farm. 
 
243 
 
 Edith. (Xo. 18.) 
 
 Both lungs badly aft'ected, and pleural adhesions to ribs. 
 Age 3 years. Dam, Highland Belle, 2nd, (No. 17). Bred 
 on College farm. 
 
 ' ' Belle of West Meadows . " I . ( No . 1 9 . ) 
 
 Aftected with tubercles in both lungs. Age 11 years. 
 Imported in her dam from the Isle of Jersey. Produce, 
 "Maid of West Meadows," (No. 20), and one bull, sold. 
 Bred on College farm. 
 ''Maid of West Meadoivs." I. (No. 20.) 
 
 AiFected with tubercles. Age 4 years. Bred in Rockland. 
 Dam, "Belle of West Meadows," (No. 19). Produce, 
 Flossy, (No. 22). 
 
 ''Belle of West Meadows' Calf:' (No. 21.) 
 
 Glands alFected. Coughed badly. Age 8 months. Dam, 
 "Belle of West Meadows," (No. 19.) Bred on the farm. 
 Flossy. (No. 22.) 
 
 Lame in left shoulder. Right lung greatly affected with 
 large abscess, left lung and bronchial glands also much 
 aft'ected. Age 2 years. Bred on College farm. Dam, 
 "Maid of West Meadows," (No. 20). No produce. 
 
 Tulip Ath. I. (No. 23.) 
 
 Large tubercle in right lung, both affected. Age 8 3'^ears. 
 Bred at Oldtown. Produce, Tulip's heifer calf, (No 24), 
 Berry, (No. 39), and one bull, sold, now coming 4 years old. 
 Bred on College farm. 
 
 Tidip's Calf. (No. 24.) 
 
 Glands aft'ected, with cough. Age 4 months. Dam, Tulip 
 4th, (No. 23). Bred on College farm. 
 
 Thresa. (No. 25.) 
 
 Tubercular dep©sits in both lungs. Age 3 years. Bred 
 on College farm. Dam, Rose Gth, (No. 48). Produce, 
 heifer calf, (No. 26). Rose 8th was killed in 1885. 
 "Thresa's Calf" (No. 26.) 
 
 Miliary deposit in both lungs. Age 5 months. Dam, 
 Thresa, (No. 25). Bred on the College farm. 
 
244 
 
 ''Princess Alba:' I. (No. 27.) 
 
 Lungs loaded with deposit, angle-berries, large abscess 
 and cavities, with bronchial glands greatly enlarged. Age 8 
 years. Purchased in Rockland. Produce, Jersey Lily (No. 
 28), Crummie, (No. 29), and the Kent bull. 
 
 ''Jersey Lily.'' I. (No. 28.) 
 
 Stiff neck, emaciated and bad cough. Age 2 years and 9 
 months. Purchased in Rockland. Dam, "Princess Alba,' 
 (No. 27). Killed by Mr. Gowell in March, 1885. 
 Orummie. (No. 29.) 
 
 Adhesions to costal pleura on left side, both lungs affected. 
 Age, about 2 years. Dam, "Princess Alba," (No. 27). 
 No produce. Bred on College farm. 
 Juno 2d. I. (No. 30.) 
 
 Sold to Mrs. Stetson of Bangor. Purchased in Auburn in 
 1883, when 2 years old. Dam, Effie. Produce, Susie, 
 (No. 31) and two bulls, sold, all bred on College farm. 
 
 Susie. (No. 31.) 
 
 Both lungs affected with miliary deposits. Age 2 years. 
 Dam, Juno 2d, (No. 30). Bred on College farm. 
 
 Julette. I. (No. 32.) 
 
 Both lungs affected with tubercles, also lymphatic glands. 
 Age 7 years. Purchased in Auburn of Briggs and Son. Dam, 
 Pet. Produce, Brownie, (No. 33). 
 
 Brownie. (No. 33.) 
 
 Stiff neck, glands enlarged, both lungs affected. Age 2 
 years and 3 months. Dam, Julette, (No. 32). Bred on Col- 
 lege farm. Killed by Mr. Gowell in March, 1885. 
 ''Gray Nose.'' (No. 34.) 
 
 Stiff neck, lungs badly affected, emaciation and cough. 
 Age, 2 years and 6 months. Dam, Hyacinthe, (No. 3). No 
 produce. Bred on College farm. Killed by Mr. Gowell in 
 March, 1885. 
 
 Betsey. I. (No. 35.) 
 
 One of the worst cases of tubercular formations and ab- 
 cess at Orono, both lungs affected. Bought by Mr. Gowell 
 
245 
 
 in Augusta, in 1883. Killed in J:\uufiry, 1886. Produce, 
 Nan Lizzie, (No. 36). 
 
 ''Nan Lizzie."' (No. 36.) 
 
 Right lung badly afFected with tubercles and cavitieji. Age 
 2 years. Bred on College farm. No i)rodu«.-,e. 
 
 Clover. I. (No. 37.) 
 
 Both lungs attccted with tubercles. Age 14 years. Bred 
 in Brunswick. Produce, Clover's Pet, (No. 38) and Hattie, 
 sold 3 years ago when a calf". 
 
 ''Clover's Pet:' (No. 38.) 
 
 Slightly atJ'ected in left lung, calcareous deposit in bron- 
 chial glands. Age 2 years. Dam, Clover, (No. 37). Bred 
 on College farm. Produce, Clover's Pet's calf, (No. 39). 
 
 "Clover's Pet's Calf." (No. 39.) 
 
 Tubercles in both lungs, bad cough. Age 8 weeks. Dam, 
 Clover's Pet, (No. 38). Bred on College farm. 
 
 Pet. I. (No. 40.) 
 
 Larofe tubercles and abscess, both lunij^s badly affected. 
 Age 14 years. Bred in Bowdoin, and bought by Mr. Ciow- 
 ell in 1882. Produce, Old Pet's calf, (No. 41) and one bull, 
 sold, now coming 4 years old. Killed by Mr. Gowell, Feb. 
 21st, 1886. 
 
 ' ' Old Pel's Calf." ( No . 4 1 . ) 
 
 Lungs affected, bad cough. Age 9 months. Dam, Old 
 Pet, (No. 40). Bred on College farm. 
 
 Juno. I. (No. 42.) 
 
 Large abscess in right lung. Left generally afiected. Age 
 11 years. Purchased in Rockland. Xo produce. 
 
 Mollie. L (No. 43.) 
 
 Rijrht lung afiected with tubercles of the size of a hen's 
 ®§o* -^&® ^ years. Bred in Howland. Purchased in 1885. 
 Princess Alice. I. (No. 44.) 
 
 Lungs studded with miliary tubercles, calcification of bron- 
 chial lymphatic glands. Age ;")* years. Killed March Uth, 
 Bred in Bowdoin. 
 
246 
 
 Bess Pet. I. (No. 45.) 
 
 Both lungs affected. 2 years old. Dam, Bess. Bred on 
 College farm. 
 Augusta Boy. I. (No. 46.) 
 
 Affected with tubercles in both lungs. Age 4 years. Bred 
 in Augusta, and placed in the herd September, 1885. 
 
 Maggie M. (No. 47.) 
 
 Emaciated and coughed badly. Age 12 years. Bred on 
 College farm. Killed by Mr. Go well in the autumn of 1884. 
 
 BoseSth. (No. 48.) 
 
 Short-Horn Herd Book cow. Refused to breed, and was 
 sold to a butcher, and her lungs found badly affected. Bred 
 at Stark, and bought with her dam when but a few days old. 
 Killed by Mr. Gowell. Produce, Thresa, (No. 25). 
 
 Berry. (No. 49.) 
 
 Thoroujrhbred Short-Horn steer. Glands affected Couirhed. 
 Age 2 years. Dam, Tulip 4th, (No. 23). Bred on College 
 farm. 
 
 Bright. (No. 50.) 
 
 Thorouo-hbred Short-Horn steer. Glands affected, with 
 bad cough. Age 19 months. Purchased when 4 days old. 
 
 Boan Heifer. (No. 51.) 
 
 Glands affected, and coughed. Age 3 months. Purchased 
 when three days old at Oldtown. 
 
 The dams of eleven of the "bulls sold" from the farm are : 
 "Helen Hart," No. 5, the dam of two. 
 Collie, No. 9, the dam of one. 
 Belle of West Meadows, No. 19, the dam of one. 
 Mildred, No. 2, the dam of one. 
 Highland Belle, 2nd, No. 17, the dam of one. 
 Tulip, 4th, No. 23, the dam of one. 
 Old Pet, No. 40, the dam of one. 
 Princess Alba, No. 27, the dam of the "Kent bull." 
 Juno, 2nd, No. 30, the dam of two. 
 
247 
 
 The post-mortem report I furnish .-ibove has been the 
 result of considemble hibor to prepare, but I believe it will 
 well repay every one interested, to give it a careful perusal, 
 as bearing directly upon the young bulls that have been sold 
 from the College farm. Take the "Hebe" family as an ex- 
 ample ; I regard Hebe as a typical case, and the real "skel- 
 eton in the closet" of the College cases. "Helen Hart," No. 
 5, is the dam of two bulls sold from the farm, now coming 
 3 and 4 years old. "Helen Hart" was out of Hepsy Hart 
 and she out of Hebe. "Hosta Hart of Orono," No. 7, was 
 out of "HestaHart" and she out of Hebe. "Hugo Pauline," 
 No. 8, was out of "Pride of Lachine" and she out of Hebe. 
 "Helen's Calf," No. 6, was out of "Helen Hart," gran- 
 dam Hebe, and Hebe is the old Jersey cow that re- 
 fused to breed, and which Mr. Rich sold for ^22, she hav- 
 ing cost the State a i'ayf years before $250.00. Reduced to 
 the military tactics of Orono, I should say that "Helen Hart" 
 enlisted at the "beginning of the campaign" in the "infant-ry 
 service," with Mr. Farrington, in 1877, and was turned over 
 (with other "pensioners") at the close of his command in 
 1878, into the "hospital department" of Mr. Rich, where, af- 
 ter serving through a "hard siege" of four years, together with 
 a lot of "diseased and disabled veterans," she joined the "new 
 recruits" of Mr. Gowell in 1882. As a member of the "full 
 band" she served all "through the war," and was turned over 
 to the State Commissioners in March, 188(1, when she was 
 "mustered out," and soon afterwards died from the "effects of 
 a ivoundy contracted while in the "service of the State." She 
 left two "sons of veterans" who are, no doubt, still "willing 
 and anxious" to serve, but as the "war is over," I have to 
 recommend that they be put on the "retired list" as soon as the 
 "necessary orders" can be given. Try the "Collie" family by 
 the same test, for Tinner/, No. 10, is the dam of 07ie of t/tese 
 bulls, now coming 3 years old. Tinney was out of the old cow 
 Collie, No. y, Tijietta, No. 14, was out of Tinney, and she 
 out of Collie, Eizeletta, No. 11, was out of Tinney, and she 
 
248 
 
 out of Collie. "Tinney's Calf," No. 15, was out of Tiiiney, 
 and she out of Collie. Blanch, No. 12, was out of Eizeletta, 
 grandam Tinncy. "Blanch's Calf," No. 16, was out of 
 Blanch, great-grandam Tinney. "Eizeletta's Calf," No. 16J, 
 was out of Eizeletta, great-grandam Collie, and Collie 2d, 
 No. 13, was also out of Collie. No. 12, No. 13, No. 14, No. 
 ]5, No. 16, No. 16^, and the bull sold, were all bred upon 
 the College ftirm. Look over the post-mortem notes oppo- 
 site each member and see how you like them. Blanch (one 
 of the very worst cases at Orono), with her dam Eizeletta, her 
 grandam Tinney, and her great-grandam Collie, stood "side 
 by side." Four generations of " Wiuthrop Jerseys," all splen- 
 did animals as far as appearances went, but whose lungs are 
 a "mass of corruption," as were all their produce, together 
 "with their uncles, their cousins and their aunts." Do 
 you wonder, then, that the "warp and woof" of tubercle 
 was woven into the "bone* and muscle" of the entire herd, 
 and that they all came honestly by the disease? Take 
 the case of ^^ Belle of West Meadows" No. 19, she is 
 the dam of one hull sold, now coming 3 years old. "Maid 
 of West Meadows," No. 20, is out of "Belle of West Mead- 
 ows," "Flossy," No. 22, is out of "Maid of West Meadows," 
 and she out of No. 19. "Belle of West Meadows' Calf," No. 
 21, is also out of No. 19, and the whole lot are diseased. 
 Mildred, No. 2, is the dam of one bull sold now coming 3 
 years old. Mildred is out of Pansy, No. 1. Hyacinthe, 
 No. 3, is out of Pansy, "Mildretta of Orono," No. 4, is 
 out of Mildred and she out of Pansy. "Gray Nose," No. 
 34, is out of Hyacinthe, and she out of Pansy. "Highland 
 Belle, 2nd," No. 17, is the dam of one hull sold, now coming 
 3 years old. "Highland Belle, 2nd," is also the dam of 
 Edith, No. 18. Both bred on the College farm. A bad lot. 
 "Tulip, 4th," No. 23, is the dam of one bull sold, now com- 
 ing 4 years old. "Tulip's Calf," No. 24, is out of Tulip, 
 4th, and Berry, No. 49, is also out of Tulip, 4th, all diseased. 
 Old Pet, No. 40, is the dam of one hull now coming 4 years 
 
249 
 
 old. Old Pet is also the dam of "Pet's Calf," No. 41. 
 Princess Alba, No. 27, is the dam of the Kent Imll. "Jer- 
 sey Lily," No. 28, is out of Princess Alha, and Crumn:ie, 
 No. 29, is also out of Princess All)a. The "Kent bull" is the 
 only one of these animals from which 1 have yet had the 
 pleasure of seeing the lungs and glands, and these plainly 
 show the primal formation of the tubercular deposit from 
 different centres, while his dam was "rotten to the core." 
 Last but not least is Juno, 2ud ; she is the dam of two bulls 
 sold from the fiarm, now coming 2 and 3 years old. Juno, 
 2nd, also produced Susie, No. 31, ail bred on the College 
 farm. Juno, 2nd, was sold from the farm to Mrs. Stetson of 
 Bangor, and although examined by Dr. Michener last April, 
 who failed to discover any unsoundness at that time, I con- 
 sider her a dangerous animal to be at large. I also failed to 
 discover any unsoundness about the Kent bull in July, but 
 foui- months later his lungs showed unmistakable lesions of the 
 disease. The al)ove nine cows, excepting Juncj, 2nd, were all 
 killed at Orono, and all found thoroughly diseased, and are 
 the dams of eleven bulls, all now in service in this State, and 
 it will be noticed that they are each the (huns of from one to 
 four other calves which we killed at Orono, who were also 
 badly diseased, and still I am told we have no proof, only a 
 susjncion that these young i)ulls (for which the Colleg(! has 
 received about $350.00) are themselves diseased. In the 
 above statement, I have had nothing to say, recollect, about 
 the sires of the above bulls, that would surely contribute to 
 and intensify the hereditary taint. In the male, tubercle is 
 also deposited in the generative organs; in the structure 
 of the testicle, producing orchitis ; in the tunica vaginalis, 
 producing dropsy (hydrocele) , and in the structure of the cord, 
 producing schirrus. What say you, farmers of Maine, do 
 you wish to patronize these bulls, or have them come in con- 
 tact with your "flocks and herds," or do you think the State of 
 Maine can afford to issue that kind of stock, and then refuse 
 to redeem (heir depreciated and worthless coupons? Although 
 it has been my constant endeavor to keep this report within 
 
250 
 
 the strictest limits conformable with what the importance of 
 the subject demands, yet as I approach the close of a docu- 
 ment that may appear lengthy and tedious to many readers, 
 I feel that I should fall far short of my duty to others, were 
 I to refuse to comment upon the cause of an apparent delay 
 in pronouncing the "College cases" fully and safely disposed 
 of, which results from the first and only "difl'erence of opinion" 
 with any of my associates, in an experience of five years of earn- 
 est and successful labor to free our State from such contagious 
 diseases as, very fortunately for us, have been "few and far be- 
 tween." On July 27th, 188G, I received a legal notice from Mr. 
 G. W. McAlister, one of the municipal officers of Bucksport, 
 to take immediate and official action in reference to one bull 
 purchased in the fait of 1885, b}' Seth N. Kent, from the herd 
 of the State College at Orono. I went at once to Bucksport 
 and found a yearling bull; while he was apparently well, I 
 advised his being kept apart from other animals, and on no 
 account to be used either for public or private service. As 
 the advice conflicted with that previously given by another 
 member of our Board, I interested myself at once, to have 
 the matter reconciled and disposed of. I wrote to Mr. Gow- 
 ell on August 7th, to know what cow was the dam of Mr. 
 Kent's bull, and on August 8th, received his reply that "the 
 animal was out of Princess Alba, No. 27, whose lungs and 
 glands were badly affected, she was one of the worst cases at 
 Orono." On August 25th, I again wrote Mr. Gowell, 
 asking him how many bulls had been sold from the College 
 herd, since he had been Superintendent, whose dams we killed, 
 and were known to be diseased. On August 28th I received 
 the following reply : — "Dear Sir: The calf was sold to Mr. 
 Kent last September. It was about four months old at that 
 time. Price paid, $20. Within the last four years fourteen 
 hulls and bull calves have been sold from the farm. Eleven 
 of them were bred from cows that we killed. The dams of 
 two others could be regarded with suspicion, as they were 
 taken from the herd because of 'refusal to breed' and un- 
 
251 
 
 known trouble, although examined by Dr. Wilde, post-mor- 
 tem. These bulls were sold for somethiuii- like $350. Many 
 of them being but a few days old, explains the low price, 
 together with the desire to benefit the farmers by selling low ; 
 'farmers' prices' our motto. Ten of these bulls were sold 
 previous to 1885 — nearly two years ago— and must have been 
 used a great deal already; those sold in 1885 probably have 
 been used limitedly. The Kent bull is the last one that went 
 out." On October 13th, at the re(|uest of Mr. Kent, I brought 
 the case before the Governor and Council at Augusta, and 
 also wrote to Dr. Michener, reporting the case, and asking 
 for his opinion. August 19th, I received his letter, dated 
 New York, '86, saying, "Your letter of the 14lh is received. 
 I do not see how any one can advise the keeping of said bull 
 for service. It must be remembered that tuberculosis is held 
 to be hereditary, by all the best authorities, both human and 
 veterinary. If this be true, and I believe it to be so unques- 
 tionably — then this particular animal is certainly an uns:ife 
 sire — or to put it differently, is a sire almost cer^am to proi)a- 
 gate the disease. He should be killed.'' On October 22nd, 
 I received a proposition from Mr. McAlister, who from the 
 first had taken much interest in the matter, saying, "If the 
 State will give $25 the bull shall be disposed of and I will 
 pay the rest of the bill myself. I make this proposition that 
 the future of this community may be safe." This proposition 
 was rejected, and finally, through the united efforts of Mr. 
 McAlister and myself, the bull was killed about Noveml)er 
 1st, and the lungs and glands sent to me for examination. I 
 retained a portion and sent the anterior lobe of the right lung 
 to the American Veterinary College of New York. The fol- 
 lowing is a copy of a letter from Dr. Michener, dated New 
 York, November 19th, 1886 : 
 
 ilv Di-AK Doctok:— Youl- letter received. 1 am ^^lad yoii wrote luo 
 conceriiiii<; tliis. as it gives nie an oppoitmiity to say that hy ciianee I saw 
 a portion of the hiii<r .«ciit to Ainerieaii Voteiinaiy College from the 
 ••Kent Bull," (Dr. Liautard told me) a calf of one of the cows of Orono 
 herd. These lungs show unmistakable lesions of Tnberculosis. Why 
 don't you hunt up all such bulls and have them destroyed? There can be 
 
252 
 
 hut little doubt that they will all sooner or later develop this disease. 
 They will serve to extend it in many herds whei-e their services are re- 
 qmred. The (Commissioners, and the State Veterinarian more than all — 
 will be, I think, directly responsible for every case of such extension. In 
 the eyes of all veterinarians you will deserve censure if you fail to follow 
 up eacli animal. Tiiey ma}' be yet used for beef. Probal)ly your liands 
 are tied. I tiiiidv this the case, for I know you well enouf^h to judge that 
 you are not one to av<^id a duty, no matter how unpleasant. 
 
 (Sd) ClI. B. MiCHENKR, D. V. S., 
 Chief Inspector of Bureau of Animal Industry, 
 U. S. Dep't of Agriculture." 
 
 These are no "idle words," they are the matured judgment 
 and opinions of a man who is a leader, and a teacher in that 
 humane i)rofession to which I have the honor to belong, and 
 I have been thus particular to offer the correspondence in 
 this case, for the reason that the "Kent bull" is the only one 
 described by Mr. Gowell in his letter of August 28th, that 
 I have yet seen, or of which I have any knowledge of their 
 present whereabouts, but as the proper disposal of all the 
 others pivots on this one case, the position I take can now be 
 fully understood, which is, that no one of these outcasts should 
 be alloived to cohabit with other animals or to jiropagate 
 their kind, and that every one of the vagabonds should be 
 promptly inspected and destroyed, either for beef or other- 
 wise as circumstances shall develop. It was Shakespeare 
 who said "Diseases desperate grown by desperate appliances 
 are relieved, or not at all." What these animals have inher- 
 ited thefy can surely transmit, and by si decree as unchang- 
 able as the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth 
 not, "the iniquities of the fathers shall be visited upon the 
 children unto the third and fourth generations." In conver- 
 sation recently with Governor Bod well, he said that he "con- 
 sidered that the animals sold out of the Orono herd, to go 
 into other herds, should have been looked after long ago, and 
 that proper measures are necessary to prevent further spread 
 of the disea.se." I am told by others who differ with me as 
 to the proper disposal of the outstanding cases at Orono, 
 first, that the law gives the Commissioners no police poivers 
 
253 
 
 whatever^ that only on appearance of disease which the 
 municipal authorities fear endangers public interests, they 
 are to call upon us. According to this, no matter how much 
 personal knowledge the Commissioners may have of the pres- 
 ence of any contagious disease, the law says "Hands oft*" 
 until some owner who does not recognize the disease has 
 notified some town officer who does know the law, that he 
 suspects contagion. "To he forewarned is to be forearmed," 
 and if this be true, the sooner the Commissioners are "clothed 
 with power" to act promptly, and to dispense with "red 
 tape" while contagion is being sown broadcast all over our 
 State, the better it will be for the community. The first 
 essential in any attempt to control contagious diseases is the 
 power to enter upon premises and inspect the stock wherever 
 it may be. Without such power the existence of contagious 
 diseases cannot be determined. Owners frequently have no 
 means of determining the nature of a malady from which their 
 animals may be sutfering, and oftener still they may be satis- 
 fied as to the character of their afiliction, but prefer that 
 others should be kept in ignorance of it. With either breed- 
 ing herds or milk dairies the business of the owner is gener- 
 ally destroyed as soon as the public learns that the animals 
 are affected, and consequently, the endeavor to keep the 
 public in ignorance of it is an effort for self-preservation. The 
 second objection to the issuing of summary orders in these cases 
 is "that we have no j^roo/" (only a suspicion) tluil these Col- 
 lege bulls are diseased." If the facts that 1 have collected, 
 presented and grouped "around and about" every one of these 
 animals is not deemed a good and sufficient answer to the lat- 
 ter allegation, then I am ready to believe that there is no ab- 
 surdity so great but that it will find some champion to de- 
 fend it. 
 
 GEO. H. BAILEY, D. V. S., Portland, Me., 
 
 Secretary and Veterinary Surgeon of Board of Commissioners 
 on Contas^ious Diseases for Maine. 
 
254 
 
 Having been put in possession of all the above facts, we 
 hereby fully concur in the above report. 
 
 W. B. Ferguson, ) Commissioners for Maine on 
 Samuel Bell, 5 Contagious Diseases of Animals. 
 
 Ch. B. Michener, D. V. S., 
 Professor of Obstetrics, Cattle Pathology, Materia Medica, 
 Therapeutics and Hygiene, American Veterinary College 
 of New York. 
 
 Frederick Henry Gerrish, M. D., 
 President Maine State Board of Health. 
 
 A. G. Young, M. D., 
 Secretary State Board of Plealth. 
 
 Portland, Sept. 1st, 1886. 
 
INDEX. 
 
 PAGES. 
 
 Bailoy. Goorjrp IT., lottors from, to Z. A. Gilbert, 71, 74, 134, 158, 161, 
 
 1C5 107, 108. 172, 173. 174, 183, 184 
 
 letter from, to J. R. Bodwell 176 
 
 letter from, to College faculty 1'34 
 
 testimony of 43, 47, 114 
 
 Bell, S.amuel, testimony of 105. 1 14 
 
 Boardman, Ileiuy, letter from, to G. H. Bailey 13S 
 
 Burleigh, Hall C, testimony of 179 
 
 Cheever, A. W., testimony of 21, 24 
 
 Conclusions of Committee 3,4 
 
 Cornish, L. C, appears as counsel for Hall C. Burleijjh 5 
 
 Farrington, J. R., testimony of 29. 30 
 
 Ferguson, William B., tcstimonj' of 47, 52. 84, 85 
 
 Feniald, M. C, testimony of 31, 178 
 
 Gilbert, Z. A., letters from, to George FT. Bailey, 50, 02, 66, 68, 72, 75, 78. 
 
 130, 131, 132. 133 
 
 letters from, to S. N . Kent 00 
 
 letters from, to Samuel Bell 106. 109, 111,112 
 
 testimony of 52, 81, 80, 105 
 
 Gowell, Gilbert M., letter from, to George IT. Bailey 72 
 
 letter from, to Mr. Kent 181 
 
 testimony of 25, 29, 31. 33, 178, 179, 180, 181 
 
 Harris, Arthur, testimony of 42 
 
 Haskell, X. P., testimony of 40, 42 
 
 Hatch, S. C 30, 31 
 
 History of cattle sold from College farm 34 
 
 Jordan, William H., testimony of 85, 86 
 
 Kent, S. N., affidavit of 1S2 
 
 letters from, to Geo. H. Bailey 120 
 
 McAlister. G. W., letters from, to Geo. II. Bailey 74, 120 
 
 letters from, to Z. A. Gilbert 170 
 
 testimony of 35 
 
25G 
 
 PAGES. 
 
 Micheuer, C. B., letters lioni, to Geo. H. Bailey 128, 139 
 
 letters from, to Z. A. Gilbert 171 
 
 Oak, Lyndon, testimony of 3G, 38 
 
 Parkhurst, E. E., testimony of 39, 40 
 
 Report of mnjority of Commissioners of Maine on Contagious Dis- 
 eases of Animals 189 
 
 Rich, T. G., testimony of 3.'), 36 
 
 Salmon, A. E., letter from, to Geo. H. Bailey 163, 171 
 
 letter from, to M. C. Fernakl 182 
 
 Sands, Lambert, testimony of 30 
 
 Sliavv, A. M.. testimony of 42, 43 
 
 Smith, A, R. G., testimony of 24, 25 
 
 Southard, Frank E.. appears as counsel for Z. A. Gilbert 86 
 
 Stevens, San ford, statement of 183 
 
 Winchester, J. F.. testimony of 5, 21 
 
STATE OF MAINE. 
 
 In Senate, March 10, 18S7. 
 
 Reported bj' Mr. ALLEN, from the Joint Special Committee to Investi- 
 gate the Cattle Disease, and on his motion laid on the table and ordered 
 printed, together with the testimonj* which is submitted as part of the 
 report. 
 
 C. W. TiLDEN, 
 
 Secretary. 
 
LIBRARY OF 
 
 CONGRESS