E C43 ^nti^Sl^iv>'M:*y Manimscmccs. ■iitXF mm ELIZABETH BUFFUM CHACE. ANTI-SLAVERY ^/^ REMINISCENCES. ELIZABETH RUFFUM CHACE. CKXTIIAL FALLS, R. L E. L. I'REEMAN & SON, STATE PKINTEK. 189L ,^^ iJicJl' /^, utLd^-'^'-- ^^-"^ ^elovfrt ^ou ami gaughtevis;, I DEDICATE Tins IJECOUD OF A I'OIJTIOX OF MY LIFE, IX THE UE.MK.MBHAXCE OF WIIIOH, AMONO IIAXV FAII.IHKS AXD SIIOKT-COJIIXGS, I XOAV, IX THE EIGHTY-FIFTH YEAR OF MY AGE, FIXl) THE MOST EXTIKE SATISFACTIOX. AXD I HOPE THAT THEY AXD THEIK CHILDKEX MAY GATHER THEREFROM SOME LESSOXS OF ADHEREXCE TO I'RIXCII'LE AXD DEVOTIOX TO DUTY, AT WHATEVER COST <»F WORLDLY TROSPERITY OR ADVAXCEJIEXT. ANTI-SLAVERY REMINISCENCES. M Y Anti Slavery reminiscences date back to a very earl}^ period in my life. My maternal ancestor, Daniel Gould, came from England, and settled in Newport, Rhode Island, in the year 1G37. He became a member of the Society of Friends, commonly called Quakers ; and, marry- ing the daughter of John Coggeshall, the first President of the Aquidneck Colony, who was also a Quaker, the descendants of the two families, for many generations, must have constituted a large portion of the society of Friends there — the first date of the existence of said society, in its original Book of Discipline, being 1675. The town of Newport became a slave market; and I have rea- son to believe that these Quaker ancestors of mine, in common with other commercial citizens of that seaport, were somewhat implicated in the African 6 ANTT-SLAVERY REMINISCENCES. slave trade. But, the spirit of early Quakerism could not wholly sanction this terrible iniquity ; and so, as early as 1727 the yearly meeting began to issue advices and remonstrances against it; the first recorded being as follows : " It is the sense of this meeting, that the importation of Negroes from their native country is not a commendable practice, and that practice is censured b}^ this meeting." In 1760 the yearly meeting issued another advice to Friends ''to keep their hands clear of this uni-ight- eous gain of oppression," and yet without abso- lute prohibition. In 1773, '' It is recommended to Friends, who have slaves in possession, to treat them with tenderness, impress God's fear in tluMr minds, promote their attending })laces of religious worship, and give those who are young, at least, so much learning that they may be capable of read- ing." The same year, they also advise that ''the young, and also the aged and impotent, be set free." The last record in the Book of Discipline is dated 1780, and disposes of the matter thus: "Agreed, that no friend iin[)ort, or any ways purchase, dis- pose of, or hold mankind as slaves ; but, that all those who have been held in a state of slavery, be discliariicd therefrom ; that all those be used well ANTI-SLAVERY REMINISCENCES. 7 who are under friends' care, and are not in circum- stances, through non-age or incapacity, to minister to their own necessities ; and that they give to those Avho are young, such an education as be- comes Christians, and encourage others in a relig- ious and virtuous life." Thus, the New England Yearly Meeting, held in Newport, Rhode Island, abolished slavery among its members, in the year 1780, while it was still legalized by the New Eng- land States. My grandmother, Sarah Gould, was born near the year 1737, and her father, James Coggeshall, soon after her birth, purchased a little African girl, from a slave-ship just come into port, to serve as nurse- maid to the child. She remained a slave in the household, until the Friends abolished slavery among themselves in 1780, when, becoming a free woman, she established herself as a cake-maker and confectioner in the town, and lived esteemed and respected to a very old age. In my very infancy, my mother used to tell to my sisters and myself, the story of this girl, Morier, who was stolen from her home and brought up a slave in our great- grandfather's house; and of the strength of her attachment to our grandmother, whom she nursed 8 ANTI-SLAVERY REMINISCENCES. in infancy. jNFy mother remembered, «ns a child, licr frefiuent visits to the liomestead, and tlie affec- tionate welcome Avhich always greeted her there. But, in all this story, which made a strong impres- sion on our minds, our gentle mother gave us no idea that she thought it was ever right to buy little girls and liold them as slaves, although it, was done by her own grandfather; so that we never had any predilections in favor of slavery. My paternal gi'andfather, William JUifl'um, of Smithfield, also a (^)uaker, was a member of the Rhode Island Society for the gradual abolition of slavery ; which was probably oi-ganized near the time when slavery was abolished in the State. When my father, Arnold lUifPum, was a child, it was not uncommon for fugitive slaves from New York, to seek refuge in Rhode Island; although the United States Constitution guaranteed to the slave- holder, the right to recapture them in any part of the country. ( )n one occasion, a whole family who had escaped, and been for some months in hiding, came to my grandfather's house. They were estab- lished in a I'aim house near the homestead, and enn)loyment was furnished to the father and the older childi'cn. In a slioi't time, their place of ANTI-SLAVERY REMINISCENCES. « refuge was discovered, and one day, the slave- master from New York, accompanied by an officer, came riding up from Providence to arrest them. Tlie neighbors were hastily summoned, and with the household of my grandfather, formed a human barricade, opposed to their entrance through the gates. A smart young colored laborer, who had become attached to one of the fugitive's daughters, brandished a knife before the slave catchers, and threatened to ''pudding" them, if they did not depart; and the calm determination, with, perhaps, some wiser threats of the assembled and constantly increasing company of defenders, succeeded in driv- ing them away without their prey ; and the fam- ily remained without further molestation. In my childhood, my father used to tell us how, as a little boy, he stood between Pedro's knees, and listened to his tales of the sufferings of the slaves, of their capture in Africa, the miseries of the slave-ship, and of his own adventures in the escape with his family; the fond father ending by placing his hand on the curly head of his youngest child, and exclaiming, "And Pedro love Cuffie better than all his chillen, cause he be free born." And so, my father became an abolitionist in his childhood ; and his detesta- 10 ANTI-SLAVEKY REMINISCENCES. tation of the "sum of all villanies," grew with his growth and strengthened with his strength, and never weakened or wavered throughout his long life. I think when the Colonization Society Avas foi-med, he gave in his adhesion to that, in the belief, shared by many other good men, that tliis was the way out of the terrible evil. When Benjamin liundy came with his appeals for gradual abolition, he hopped for rescue by this means, but, Avhen William Lloyd Garrison raised the cry for " immediate and uncon- ditional emancipation," m}^ father's clear head, his tender heart, and his unshrinking conscience, em- braced, without doubt or question, the principles of the Garrisonian Anti-Slavery movement. He be- came the first President of the New p]ngland Anti- Slavery Society, and lived and labored in and for the cause for many years, though obloquy and per- secution pursued and assailed him therefor. Thus was I born and baptized into the Anti-Slavery spirit. Our family were all Abolitionists. Never, in our large household, do I recall one word short of condemnation of the vile system. In our minds there were no palliating circumstances. The slave-holders were man-stealers ; and, as one of the earliest of the lectvn'crs used constantly to de- ANTI-SLAVERY REMINISCENCES. 11 clare, they must " quit stealing." When I married, and my husband's attention was called to the ques- tion, he readily accepted the Anti-Slavery princi- ples, and remained faithful thereto, during his life. Up to the time of the issue of the first number of the Liberator, in the year 1831, we had believed there should be devised some scheme for gradual emanci- pation, as did our father. Soon after that, when he came to m^- home at Fall River, and brought us the new paper, and told us of having met Garrison and heard his arguments, and how the New England So- ciety had been formed, I remember asking him if he thought it would be quite safe to set the slaves free all at once. In a few Avords, he dispelled, once for all, that illusion from my mind; and from that hour we were all Garrisonians. I remember well, how eager we were, in our revived Anti-Slavery zeal, to present the cause of the slave to everybody we met; not doubting that, when their attention was called to it, they would be ready, as we were, to demand his immediate emancipation. But, alas! their com- mercial relations, their political associations, and with many, their religious fellowship with the peo- ple of the South, so blinded the eyes, hardened the hearts and stifled the consciences of the North, that 12 ANTI-SLAVEPvY REMINISCENCES, we found very few people who were ready to give any countenance or support to the new Anti- Shxvery movement. My fatlior and mother were, by inheritance, by education and by conviction, members of tlie Society of Friends ; and were devoted to its piiiici- ples, its service and mode of worsliip; and their chikh-en, being also birth-right members, had been taught great reverence and respect for its ministers and elders, as well as for all the doctrines and peculiar customs of the Society. The idea of infallibility, without using the word, was at that time, strong in the family mind. So, from the Friends surely, we expected sympathy and co- opei'ation. But, as we met them, individually or in groups, and made our appeal for the slave, we were shocked to find that even they, whose fore- fathers had abolished slavery among themselves, while it was still legalized by the State, and had inserted in their Book of Discipline, the advice to be often read, "That Friends be careful to maintain our testimony faithfully against slavery," had be- come so demoralized, that they too, with rare ex- ceptions, shut their eyes to the great iniquity. They objected to the strong, denunciatory language ANTI-SLAVERY REMINISCENCES. 13 of the Liberator ; they disapproved of Friends uniting with other people in public meetings or in philanthropic work ; they did not think the slaves should be set free all at once, and they did not want their daughters to marry negroes. I remem- ber making an appeal to a Quaker brother-in-law of mine, by asking him if he did not think the slaves should be freed, and his only reply Avas, ''I shouldn't want to see a black man sitting on the sofa beside my daughter." We went to our yearly meeting at Newport, and there, slavery was the chief topic of conversation, at the hotel where many Friends were staying ; so stirred were people everywhere, either for or against the system, by the new awakening. But alinost everybody was against us. They denounced the Liberator; Garrison was an infidel ; slavery could only be cut off gradually ; the colored race must be colonized in Africa. Joseph Bowne, a distin- guished preacher from New York, was heard to declare, that, if he could set all the slaves free, within thirty years, by turning over his hand, he would not do it. In the meeting, we were cau- tioned by our ministers, not to give way to excite- ment, but to keep "in the quiet, and wait for Divine 14 ANTI-SLAVEIIY REMINISCENCES. guidance ; and not to unite with people outside of our religious society, in public undertakings. Those who had already made tlietnselves obnoxious in these ways, were ignored in the appointment of committees; and some who stood on standing com- mittees, were dropped therefrom. There was a general treatment of such as were known to be Abolitionists, as suspicious persons — persons to be overlooked and avoidc(l. I had, from my childhood, been a devout believer in and defender of orthodox (^)uakerism. I had been Overseer of the Poor, in Swanzcy monthly meeting, its assistant clerk, and finally its clerk; and had been, in various ways, "made use of," as the phrase was in the Society. I wore the Quaker costume in its entirety, and had never said "you " to a single person in my life, or given the title of " Mr." or " Mrs." to anybod3\ I was constant in the attendance of our religious meetings, and firmly believed in the efficacy of our simple, and as we called them, unceremonious modes of worship. But, to be an Abolitionist, put me down among the ostracized. I remember, on one occasion, at the yearly meeting, when an epistle, prei)ared to be sent to a distant vearly mectini;-, was read bv the ANTI-SLAVERY REMINISCENCES. 15 clerk and presented for approval, which contained the usual formula of the declaration of our testi- mony against the enslavement of " Africans," I objected to this designation, as most of the slaves in this country, at that time, were natives of America. Another Anti-Slavery woman seconded my remon- strance, and finally the word was changed. We afterward learned, that a friend present from Phila- delphia, inquired who those young women were, and expressed her surprise that our protest was heeded, " as such a proposal coming from a person in the body of the house, would be entirely unnoticed in Philadelphia yearly meeting." At that time, the prejudice against color, through- out New England, was even stronger than the pro- slavery spirit. On one occasion, my husband and myself went to Boston, to attend the annual meeting of the New England Anti-Slavery So- ciety. Accompanied by a gentleman friend, we drove to Taunton from Fall River, there to take the railroad, which I think, at that time, furnished only one car for the journey. As we entered the car, Samuel Rodman, an Anti-Slavery man from New Bedford, and a highly respectable, well-dressed colored man and his wife, from the same town, took 16 ANTI-SLAVEHV REMINISCENCES. seats therein also. The coiuluctor came and ordered the colored people to leave the car. We all remonstrated, of course, but without avail. He called the superintendent, who peremptoril}^ re- })eated the order. They got out quietly, and we did the same, (but not so quietly,) and retired to the waiting-room, leaving the car empty. The officials held a conference outside, and the conduc- tor soon informed us that an extra car had been put on for the negroes, and invited us to take the seats we had left. We held a little conference among ourselves, and then every one of us entered the car with the colored people. The sujx'rintendeiit was very angry, but he did not (piite dare to order us out, so he assured us that our conduct would avail nothing, for no negroes would ever be permitted to be mixed U[) with white |)eople on that road. They were mixed up with us, however, on that day, and we found them intelligent, agreeable companions. In some cases, persons who were opposed to slavery and were willing to woi-k for its abolition, still strongly objected to any association with colored persons in their Anti-Slavery labors. W'c organized a I'emale Anti-Slavery Society at Fall Iviver, about the year 183"). In the village were a ANTI-8LAVERY REMINISCENCES. 17 few very respectable young col(3red women, who came to our meetings. One evening, soon after the Society was formed, my sister and myself went to them and invited them to join. This raised such a storm among some of the leading members, that for a time, it threatened the dissolution of the Society. They said they had no objection to these women attending the meetings, and they were willing to help and encourage them in every way, but they did not think it was at all proper to invite them to join the Society, thus putting them on an equality with ourselves. We maintained our ground, how- ever, and the colored women were admitted. =•' At one time, when we had an Anti-Slavery Con- vention at Fall River, a large number of visitors dined at our house. Among them were the two New Bedford people, who had so shocked the sensi- * I regret to be obliged, as a faithful chronicler of my Anti-Slavery experiences, to state, that in the year 1877, twelve years after the abolition of slavery, and many more years after the admission of col- ored children into the public schools of the city of Providence, my daughters and myself were compelled, conscientiously, to resign our membership in the Ehode Island Women's Club, because that body refused admission to a highly respectable, well-educated woman, solely on account of the color of her skin, although she had been a teacher of a colored school in that city for twenty -five years. 18 ANTI-SIAVEUY llEMINISCENCES. bilities of tlie railroad ofiicials at Taimloii, and. I think, Charles Lenox llenioud, a young colored Anti-Slavery orator. We had then in our house, in some useful capacity, a devoted l^)aptist woman, who usually sat at the family table. When the dinner was ready, I asked her to come. She replied, " No ; I don't eat with niggers." When the dinner was over and the guests had retired to the parlor, I called her again. And again she answered, '' No ; I don't eat inith niggers nor after 'em." Whether she went hungry that day, I never inquired. In the year 1839, my husband and myself re- moved with our family to Valley Falls, Rhode Island, bringing our Anti-Slavery principles with us. And, tliough he had been a consistent Friend from his youth up, and I remained clerk of Swan- zey monthly meeting, until obliged to resign on account of our removal, the certificate they gave us to Providence monthly meeting, was deficient in respect to our standing, in that it omitted the usual acknowledgment that we were " of orderly lives and conversation," and only declared our membership in the Society. Our Anti-Slavery attitude soon put us under the ban of disapproval among Providence Friends. ANTI-KLAVERY REMINISCENCES. 19 One day, soon after our removal, 1 was walking on the street in the city, when the leading minister of Providence monthly meeting, overtook me, and greeted me very cordially. Walking beside me, he told me that he and his wife, (also a minister,) intended to call on us soon. I assured him of a hearty welcome. And then 1 remembered that I had in m}^ pocket, an address to American Friends, on their inconsistent attitude toward the slavery <|uestion, by Joseph Sturge, an eminent English Friend, who had recently travelled in this country, and who had been an active laborer in the Anti- Slavery cause at home. I asked the friend if he ha