.M^ ii liili Class ^TSjSAL Book^ _-_Ai— Coi)yiight]^"_: m^. COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. I THE PROFESSOR AT THE BREAKFAST -TABLE WITH THE STORY OF IRIS BY OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY RICHARD BURTON ' o ■» o o > O O 3 O NEW YORK THOMAS Y. CROWELL & CO. PUBLISHERS •\<\0 1- THE LiBf?AftY OF CONGRESS, Two CoPlfeo RjtCSIVED NOV, li ]m9 n> /-^RCv.yyr ^'o. Copyright, 1902, By THOMAS Y. CROWELL & CO. INTRODUCTION. The Professor at the Breakfast Table appeared in the Atlantic Monthly in 1859, two years after the Autocrat Iiad made'^liis brilliant bow in the pages of the same perio(Jij:al. Few are the writers who can withstand what they interpret as a public appeal to then^ for more work of a kind already approved. Sequels to our Prisoners of Zenda of yesterday or to-day seem well-nigh inevitable. Fewer still justify this repetition, — and for reasons not far to seek. In the first instance," the author had something to say; in the second, he is hampered by having to say some- thing. There is danger that the difference may be that between inspiration and mechanism. Yet this yielding to the demand of readers is not of necessity mercenary ; sometimes it is happily justi- fied in the event. When an author is of the right sort, the very knowledge that a wide circle of well- wishers is a-clamor for more, is like a cordial at his heart, and, not mechanically, with no thought of mate- rial rewards, he pours himself out upon paper with a genuine gusto of creative pleasure. Thus, Ik Mar- vel, writing his Reveries of a Bachelor^ followed it up the next year with Dream Children^ to the fur- ther enrichment of American letters. And thus Dr. Holmes let his Professor follow hard on the Autocrat iv INTRODUCTION. who had dispensed a genial wisdom to the Atlantic readers. The first of the Breakfast Table series was a contribution which helped to make memorable the early history of the Atlantic Monthly, for nothing did more for its circulation or prestige. Lowell had made Holmes^s assistance a condition of the former's accept- ance of the post of editor, and the result in this case happily illustrates the fact that, cynics to the contrary, a magazine editor — if he but be a Lowell ! — is now and then perceptive in discovering a valuable author. It was natural, therefore, for more reasons than one, that Dr. Holmes, who by the famous opening series of essays had established a reputation as an essayist which he had not possessed before, should have con- tinued in the same vein with 'Cii€*Professor at the Breakfast Table. That inimitable causerie the Auto- crat, in truth, marks his passage from a local to a national fame. Hitherto, and up to middle life, litera- ture had been with him a minor thing, an aside ; from this forward, it was to become his chief business, and he was to take his place among the American writers of general significance. Nothing quite like the Auto- crat had before appeared in American literature. The social essay, the confidjsntial talk between author and reader, easy, vernacular, yet well bred and elegant, wise without heaviness, light and sparkling with noth- ing of the trifling or petty, full of pregnant thought never didactically conveyed, and of a form so charm- ing that instruction is lost in pleasure, — these quali- ties, amply illustrated in Dr. Holmes's essay work as we have it now in half a dozen books, was first dis- INTR OD UC TION. V played in full length in the Autocrat. The rich humanity of the chapters, the happy kit-kats of the folk who gathered around the boarding-house table, — itself a clever framework enabling the writer to talk in a wider gamut than would have been possible had he always spoken in proper person ; the frequent intercolations of verse, much of it destined to take a permanent place in the American Anthology, — the many palpable hits upon foibles or follies of the day, the gentle satire which was veiled in such kindly humor as to remove all sting — the first of these three essay series brought all this to a host of readers and definitely made Holmes's reputation as an essay writer. It is worthy of note, in passing, that Dr. Holmes again and again in naming his book, registers, per- haps unconsciously, his marked social instinct ; a sense of man's social solidarity : witness the old-age chronicle Over the Tea-cups^ where the image recurs. How true it is that the Mahogany is in the history of civilization a cheery symbol for one of humanity's most winsome traits, — the desire to surround with companionable good cheer the elemental need for food ! Animals only prefer to eat alone. In a broad sense the Professor carried on under the same attrac- tive gastronomic guise the social talk of the Autocrat, yet a difference may be easily felt. Here again, as in its predecessor, the essayist to the manner born speaks with all his wonted naturalness. Dr. Holmes was a brilliant talker at the famed Saturday Club ; here in these pages, so far as atmosphere and temper go, he puts the Saturday Club on paper. vi INTRODUCTION. The distinction between the Autocrat and the Pro- fessor is hardly that implied in the two names. The Professor, to be sure, is ostensibly of the medical craft — a sort of hypostasis of Holmes himself; much of his talk shows this special knowledge, even point of view. Yet in the main he is, like his prototype, a cultured, broad-minded man of the world social and the world intellectual, talking about Hfe in terms of humanity. The observational coign of vantage in each case is that of a man more interested in ideas and in his fellowmen, than in his own occupation. In fact, a crowning characteristic of this whole essay- trilogy is found in the attitude of the writer; he is an intellectual free lance, with never a suspicion of prej- udice or parti pris. This remacJc applies almost equally well to the last book of the group, The Poet at the Breakfast Table, where the spirit is a little less spontaneous, — although, perhaps, our knowledge ol what has gone before disqualifies us for an absolutely fair judgment. Nor is there a noticeable change in the dramatic quality of the Professor compared with the Autocrat. The story frame is slight in both performances, as I have implied ; hardly more than a device to secure for the monoldgist a greater freedom, — a freedom we are delighted to grant the true essayist. It may be said, however, that there is scarcely to be found in the first of the famous series, so sympathetic and vivid a char- acter group as that in the Professor composed of the Little Gentleman, Iris, and her lover. Such charac- terization prepares one for the best figure-work in INTRODUCTION. vil Elsie Venner a little later. Pathos and humor on a groundwork of ruddy human interest have never been more happily conveyed by an American writer. One has to go to Curtis' Priie and /, or to an occasional page in Dr. MitchelPs Reveries of a Bachelor for any- thing like a parallel. Yet despite these variations on the one theme played by Dr. Holmes in his Atlantic essays, the thoughtful reader will be most struck in the Professor by his more serious purpose, in the frankly fearless discus- sions of moot questions of the day, questions social, political, philosophical, scientific, religious, — this last with a special stress. It is as if, having won a wide audience at last (in 1859 Dr. Holmes was fifty years of age, he had waited till flill maturity for general recognition), this author now felt himself free to utter his thought, to express his deeper convictions, mak- ing less use of that keen stiletto of wit, which is the humorist's light but most serviceable weapon for thrust and parry; in sooth, more serviceable often than the truncheon of the heavier philosopher. This more pronounced accent, this deeper note, are appar- ent enough in the Professor, and possibly they make the book less delightful to some. More of intellec- tual stimulation is the compensation. The Professor is a true emancipator from prejudice in the middle of the nineteenth century. His work, in Matthew Arnold's phrase, is of the centre ; he moves and has his being in the higher current of ideas, — although constantly he returns to mother earth, there win- somely to express his interest in particular human viii INTRODUCTION. beings — the vulgar Kohlnoor, the aggravating theo- logical student, even that awful landlady's daughter with her cheap ornaments and her cheaper loves. This boldness, spelling radicalism in its day, though now it seems a mild enough attack on the social windmills, aroused due measure of opposition in Dr. Holmes's day. There is ample testimony to the fact. Mr. Scudder in his biography of Lowell speaks of the Professor at the Breakfast Table, "in which this writer, who had leaped into popularity through the Autocrat, dehvered himself of opinions and judg- ments which were regarded by a good many as dan- gerous, subversive, — all the more dangerous by reason of their wit and entertaining qualities. If one could believe many of the newspapers, Dr< Holmes was a sort of reincarnation of Voltaire, who stood for the most audacious enemy of Christianity in modern times." The doctor himself was sufBciently aware of the nature of his screed and of its reception. In the Preface of 1882 he declares that "the new pa- pers" [the Professor series] "were more aggressive than the earlier ones, and for that reason found a heartier welcome in some quarters, and met with a sharper antagonism in others. It amuses me to look back upon some of tHe attacks they called forth. Opinions which do not now excite the faintest show of temper at this time from those who do not accept them, are treated as if they were the utterances of a nihilist incendiary. It required the exercise of some forbearance not to recriminate." All the more marked is the change at present, twenty years after this preface INTR OD UC TION. ix was penned. This puts us on the thought that Dr. Holmes was in this respect one of our representative American authors ; it was impossible for him not to have ethical predispositions. The suggestion of per- secution, too, is a reminder how true it is that our elder authors as a group had the courage of their con- victions, and were made aware of the discomforts attendant upon a stanch declaration of principle. Full of flavor, too, for the present-day reader is what may be called the New England, not to say the Bos- ton, point of view of the essayist, which flirnishes a sort of platform whence he may speak. This might seem to imply something of the narrow or exclusive ; yet not so. Dr. Holmes in all his writings gives us a good illustration of the right use of localism, of the patriotism that is well bred and quite removed from any taint of Chauvinism. He is local without being provincial. He would himself be the first to laugh at his own parochialism. A sense of humor saves him from, taking even Bunker Hill or Boston Common too seriously. But what, now, were the subjects which Dr. Holmes handled in a way to make him seem an iconoclast? They were well-nigh as broad and varied as the mind of man itself. Noticeable is the interest in such aspects of science as were then new to discussion, tentative to trial ; noticeable too the skill and relish with which Dr. Holmes incorporates into his speech scientific terms, making metaphor after metaphor from this new material. It would be worth some one's while to study the Breakfast series in its stylistic X INTRODUCTION. manifestations, as a remarkable example of the rapid assimilation of new thought for purposes of new ex- pression. On one page the essayist discourses of phrenology as a pseudo-science ; on another, he gives a most sensible little talk on the value of money in relation to social position. Here he holds forth on development with more than a hint of the as yet com- paratively unfamiliar theory of the survival of the fittest ; there he waxes vigorous over the silliness of spiritualism. Breadth of view, clearness of vision, tolerance and common sense make up his judgments. Very rarely does he vent an opinion which, from our vantage-point of time, can seem anything but sound. Some, to-day, will think him hardly fair to homeop- athy, at which he pokes gentle fua ; contrariwise, his diatribe against the "solemn farce of over-drug- ging," and in ridicule of the holding to the' absurdly mysterious nomenclature of the doctor's prescription, comes more kindly to our ears than ever it could to those of forty odd years ago. The frequent disserta- tions on religion are admirable for their emphasis on the truly important and permanent, the pushing aside of the husks of dogma. A fine example of this spirit is the picture, in the ninth chapter, of the two churches, St. Polycarp and the Chdrch of the Galileans, the one standing for pomp and liturgy, the other for simplicity and humble good works, — both phases of the life spiritual receiving full justice in a mood which recog- nizes the essence of all true religion to be summed in aspiration and altruism. One listens to Dr. Holmes's mild defence of the social INTR OD UC TION. xi glass with an amused sense of the storm it must have aroused among the Temperance Unions ; but even when he is most vigorously treading upon pet theories, the tone of polite deference, the stingless gayety, the genuine bonhomie behind the intellectual earnestness of the man, are such as to make the argument winning, or at least inoffensive. In short, the social note, if I may so phrase it, is steadily clear and strong with Dr. Holmes. It may well be, however, that the majority of his audience then and now enjoys the human nature of these sketches more than they do the mental stimula- tion to be got out of them. The sly thrusts of satire at such oddities in the Vanity Fair as are displayed by the young man John, with his all-unconscious good- natured vulgarity ; the landlady herself, whose homely speech reflects deliciously the war within her breast of self-interest and kindliness ; the Poor Relation, humor- ous yet with a touch of pathos which recalls Coleridge's " poor nigh-related guest, Who hath outstayed his welcome while And tells the jest without the smile," these and still other figures rise before the mind's eye and remain in memory. All the depths of human life between love and death are traversed in the account of the relation between Iris and the Little Gentleman ; the whole description of his death has a beauty that is lyrical, displaying an essayist thoroughly vibrant to his theme, touching the human heart to the quick. It may be doubted if he ever did anything better in this kind. Xii INTRODUCTION. And then the manner of it all ! One comes back at the end to speak of style, since that means so much with the essayist. Never can it be forgotten that with him above all writers the style is the man. The prose movement here is so keyed that it does not seem abrupt or out of tune to interpolate frequent pieces of verse after the gentle fashion begun in the Autocrat ; and some of the best known poems of our author are here, although there is no second Chambered Nautilus or One-Hoss Shay. The men in American Literature can be counted on the fingers of one's right hand who have possessed, as did Dr. Holmes, the unmistakable essay touch and tone ; so exceptional is this particular gift. It is indeed misleading to imply that talk like this is separable from the thought itself; in fact, mat- ter and manner are inseparable ; simply phases of personality. Dr. Holmes follows the rule laid down by himself in the Autocrat ; he talks of what has long been in his mind, what has, therefore, received leisurely incubation. The real talkers, he declares, are " the people with fresh ideas, of course, and plenty of good warm words to dress them in." Here he sits for his own photograph. That he used this inimitable faculty of expression to purposes of so much charm and profit is part of the' good fortune of our native literature. To make us live in the world of ideas, not in philo- sophic detachment therefrom, but all the while with our feet firmly planted on the bed-rock of homely human affairs, — that is the service Dr. Holmes ren- ders us in this and the other books of the series. INTR OD UCTION. XUI And although in the Professor there is more of phi- losophy, a touch of the polemic, the book is made both vivid and lovely by its rich humanity in the portrayal of characters, its sane presentation of some of the fundamental emotions of the human heart. Richard Burton. March 29, 1902. THE PROFESSOR AT THE BREAKFAST-TABLE. WHAT HE SAID, WHAT HE HEARD, AND WHAT HE SAW. I. I INTENDED to have signalized my first appearance by a certain large statement, which I flatter myself is the nearest approach to a universal formula of life yet promulgated at this breakfast-table. It would have had a grand effect. For this purpose I fixed my eyes on a certain divinity-student, with the intention of ex- changing a few phrases, and then forcing my court- card, namely. The great end of being. — I will thank you for the sugar, — I said. — Man is a dependent creature. It is a small favor to ask, — said the divinity-student, — and passed the sugar to me. — Life is a great bundle of little things, — I said. The divinity-student smiled, as if that was the con- cluding epigram of the sugar question. You smile, — I said. — Perhaps life seems to you a little bundle of great things ? The divinity-student started a laugh, but suddenly reined it back with a pull, as one throws a horse on his haunches. — Life is a great bundle of great things, — he said. (^Now, then !) The great end of being, after all, is — I 2 THE PROFESSOR Hold on ! — said my neighbor, a young fellow whose name seems to be John, and nothing else, — for that is what they all call him, — hold on ! the Sculpin is go'n' to say somethin'. Now the Sculpin {^Coitus Virghiianus) is a little water-beast which pretends to consider itself a fish, and, under that pretext, hangs about the piles upon which West-Boston Bridge is built, swallowing the bait and hook intended for flounders. On being drawn from the water, it exposes an immense head, a diminutive bony carcass, and a surface so full of spines, ridges, ruffles, and frills, that the naturalists have not been able to count them without quarrelHng about the number, and that the colored youth whose sport they spoil, do not like to touch them, and especially to tread on them, unless they happeif to have shoes on, to cover the thick white soles of their broad black feet. When, therefore, I heard the young fellow's excla- mation, I looked round the table with curiosity to see what ^t meant. At the further end of it I saw a head, and a small portion of a little deformed body, mounted on a high chair, which brought the occupant up to a fair level enough for him to get at his food. His whole appearance was so grotesque, I felt for a minute as if there was a showman behind him who would pull him down 'presently and put up Judy, or the hangman, or the Devil, or some other wooden per- sonage of the famous spectacle. I contrived to lose the first part of his sentence, but what I heard began so: — — by the Frog-Pond, when there were frogs in it, and the folks used to come down from the tents on 'Lection and Independence days with their pails to get water to make egg-pop with. Born in Boston ; AT THE BREAKFAST-TABLE. 3 went to school in Boston as long as the boys would let me. — The little man groaned, turned, as if to look round, and went on. — Ran away from school one day to see Phillips hung for killing Denegri with a loggerhead. That was in flip days, when there were always two or three loggerheads in the fire. I 'm a Boston boy, I tell you, — born at North End, and mean to be buried on Copps' Hill, with the good old underground people, — the Worthylakes, and the rest of 'em. Yes, Sir, — up on the old hill, where they buried Captain Daniel Malcolm in a stone grave, ten feet deep, to keep him safe from the red-coats, in those old times when the world was frozen up tight and there wasn't but one spot open, and that was right over Faneuil Hall, — and black enough it looked, I tell you ! There's where my bones shall lie, Sir, and rattle away when the big guns go off at the Navy Yard opposite ! You can't make me ashamed of the old place ! Full of crooked little streets ; — I was born and used to run round in one of 'em — — I should think so, — said that young man whom I hear them call "John," — softly, not meaning to be heard, nor to be cruel, but thinking in a half-whisper, evidently. — I should think so ; and got kinked up, turnin' so many corners. — The little man did not hear what was said, but went on, — — full of crooked little streets ; but I tell you Bos- ton has opened, and kept open, more turnpikes that lead straight to free thought and free speech and free deeds than any other city of live men or dead men, — I don't care how broad their streets are, nor how high their steeples ! — How high is Bosting meet'n'-house ? — said a person with black whiskers and imperial, a velvet 4 THE PROFESSOR waistcoat, a guard-chain rather too massive, and a diamond pin so very large that the most trusting na- ture might confess an inward stiggestioii^ — of course, nothing amounting to a suspicion. For this is a gentleman from a great city, and sits next to the landlady's daughter, who evidently believes in him, and is the object of his especial attention. How high ? — said the little man. — As high as the first step of the stairs that lead to the New Jerusalem. Isn't that high enough ? It is, — I said. — The great end of being is to har- monize man with the order of things ; and the church has been a good pitch-pipe, and may be so still. But who shall tune the pitch-pipe ? Qids ens — (On the whole, as this quotation was not entirely new, and, being in a foreign language, might not be familiar to all the boarders, I thought I would not finish it.) — Go to the Bible ! — said a sharp voice from a sharp-faced, sharp-eyed, sharp-elbowed, strenuous- looking woman in a black dress, appearing as if it began as a pjece of mourning and perpetuated itself as a bit of economy. You speak well. Madam, — I said ; — yet there is room for a gloss or commentary on what you say. "He who would bring back the wealth of the Indies must carry out the wealth of the Indies." What you bring away from the Bible depends to some extent on vv'hat you carry to it. — Benjamin Franklin ! Be so good as to step up to my chamber and bring me down the small uncovered pamphlet of twenty pages which you will find lying under the " Cruden's Con- cordance." [The boy took a large bite, which left a very perfect crescent in the slice of bread-and-butter he held, and departed on his errand, with the por- AT THE BREAKFAST-TABLE. 5 table fraction of his breakfast to sustain him on the way.] Here it is. "Go to the Bible. A Dissertation, etc., etc. By J. J. Flournoy. Athens, Georgia. 1858." Mr. Flournoy, Madam, has obeyed the precept which you have judiciously delivered. You may be interested, Madam, to know what are the conclusions at which Mr. J. J. Flournoy of Athens, Georgia, has arrived. You shall hear, Madam. He has gone to the Bible, and he has come back from the Bible, bringing a remedy for existing social evils, which, if it is the real specific, as it professes to be, is of great interest to humanity, and to the female part of humanity in particular. It is what he calls trigainy, Madam, or the marrying of three wives, so that "good old men " may be solaced at once by the companion- ship of the wisdom of maturity, and of those less per- fected but hardly less engaging qualities which are found at an earlier period of life. He has followed your precept. Madam ; I hope you accept his con- clusions. The female boarder in black attire looked so puz- zled, and, in fact, " all abroad," after the delivery of this " counter " of mine, that I left her to recover her wits, and went on with the conversation, which I was beginning to get pretty well in hand. But in the mean time I kept my eye on the female boarder to see what effect I had produced. First, she was a little stunned at having her argument knocked over. Secondly, she was a little shocked at the tre- mendous character of the triple matrimonial sugges- tion. Thirdly. — I don't like to say what I thought. Something seemed to have pleased her fancy. 6 THE PROFESSOR Whether it was, that, if trigamy should come into fashion, there would be three times as many chances to enjoy the luxury of saying, " No ! " is more than I can tell you. I may as well mention that B. F. came to me after breakfast to borrow the pamphlet for " a lady," — one of the boarders, he said, — looking as if he had a secret he wished to be relieved of. — I continued. — If a human soul is necessarily to be trained up in the faith of those from whom it in- herits its body, why, there is the end of all reason. If, sooner or later, every soul is to look for truth with its own eyes, the first thing is to recognize that no presumption in favor of any particular belief arises from the fact of our inheriting it. Otherwise you would not give the Mahometan a fair chance to be- come a convert to a better religion. -^ The second thing would be to depolarize every fixed religious idea in the mind by changing the word which stands for it. — I don't know what you mean by " depolarizing " an idea, — sa'id the divinity-student. I will tell you, — I said. — When a given symbol which represents a thought has lain for a certain length of time in the mind, it undergoes a change like that which rest in a certain position gives to iron. It becomes magnetic in its relations, — it is traversed by strange forces which did not belong to it. The word, and consequently the idea it represents, is polarized. The religious currency of mankind, in thought, in speech, and in print, consists entirely of polarized words. Borrow one of these from another language and religion, and you will find it leaves all its magnet- ism behind it. Take that famous word, O'm, of the AT THE BREAKFAST-TABLE. J Hindoo mythology. Even a priest cannot pronounce it without sin ; and a holy Pundit would shut his ears and run away from you in horror, if you should say it aloud. What do you care for O'm ? If you wanted to get the Pundit to look at his religion fairly, you must first depolarize this and all similar words for him. The argument for and against new translations of the Bible really turns on this. Skepticism is afraid to trust its truths in depolarized words, and so cries out against a new translation. I think, myself, if every idea our Book contains could be shelled out of its old symbol and put into a new, clean, unmagnetic word, we should have some chance of reading it as philoso- phers, or wisdom-lovers, ought to read it, — which we do not and cannot now, any more than a Hindoo can read the " Gayatri " as a fair man and lover of truth should do. When society has once fairly dissolved the New Testament, which it never has done yet, it will perhaps crystallize it over again in new forms of language. — I didn't know you was a settled minister over this parish, — said the young fellow near me. A sermon by a lay-preacher may be worth listen- ing to, — I replied, calmly. — It gives ihe parallax oi thought and feeling as they appear to the observers from two very difTerent points of view. If you wish to get the distance of a heavenly body, you know that you must take two observations from remote points of the earth's orbit, — in midsummer and midwinter, for instance. To get the parallax of heavenly truths, you must take an observation from the position of the laity as well as of the clergy. Teachers and students of theology get a certain look, certain conventional tones of voice, a clerical gait, a professional neckcloth, 8 THE PROFESSOR and habits of mind as professional as their externals. They are scholarly men and read Bacon, and know well enough what the " idols of the tribe " are. Of course they have their false gods, as all men that fol- low one exclusive calling are prone to do. — The clergy have played the part of the fly-wheel in our modern civilization. They have never suffered it to stop. They have often carried on its movement, when other moving powers failed, by the momentum stored in their vast body. Sometimes, too, they have kept it back by their vis hierticB, when its wheels were like to grind the bones of some old canonized error into fertilizers for the soil that yields the bread of life. But the mainspring of the world's onward religious movement is not in them, nor in any one body of men, let me tell you. It is the people that naakes the clergy, and not the clergy that makes the people. Of course, the profession reacts on its source with variable en- ergy. — But there never was a guild of dealers or a company of craftsmen that did not need sharp look- ing after. ' Our old friend, Dr. Holyoke, whom we gave the din- ner to some time since, must have known many people that saw the great bonfire in Harvard College yard. — Bonfire ? — '■ shrieked the little man. — The bon- fire when Robert Calef s book was burned ? The same, — I said, — when Robert Calef the Bos- ton merchant's book was burned in the yard of Har- vard College, by order of Increase Mather, President of the College and Minister of the Gospel. You re- member the old witchcraft revival of '92, and how stout Master Robert Calef, trader, of Boston, had the pluck to tell the ministers and judges what a set of fools and worse than fools they were — AT THE BREAKFAST-TABLE. 9 Remember it ? — said the little man. — I don't think I shall forget it, as long as I can stretch this fore- finger to point with, and see what it wears. — There was a ring on it. May J look at it ? — I said. Where it is, — said the little man ; — it will never come off, till it falls off from the bone in the darkness and in the dust. He pushed the high chair on which he sat slightly back from the table, and dropped himself, standing, to the floor, — his head being only a little above the level of the table, as he stood. With pain and labor, lifting one foot over the other, as a drummer handles his sticks, he took a few steps from his place, — his motions and the dead beat of the misshapen boots an- nouncing to my practised eye and ear the malforma- tion which is called in learned language talipes varus^ or inverted club-foot. Stop ! stop ! — I said, — let me come to you. The little man hobbled back, and lifted himself by the left arm, with an ease approaching to grace which surprised me, into his high chair. I walked to his side, and he stretched out the forefinger of his right hand, with the ring upon it. The ring had been put on long ago, and could not pass the misshapen joint. It was one of those funeral rings which used to be given to relatives and friends after the decease of per- sons of any note or importance. Beneath a round bit of glass was a death's head. Engraved on one side of this, "L. B. JE\. 22," — on the other, "Ob. 1692." My grandmother's grandmother, — said the little man. — Hanged for a witch. It doesn't seem a great while ago. I knew my grandmother, and loved her. Her mother was daughter to the witch that Chief Jus- lO THE PROFESSOR tice Sewall hanged and Cotton Mather delivered over to the Devil. — That was Salem, though, and not Boston. No, not Boston. Robert Calef, the Boston merchant, it was that blew them all to — Never mind where he blew them to, — I said; — for the little man was getting red in the face, and I didn't know what might come next. This episode broke me up, as the jockeys say, out of my square conversational trot ; but I settled down to it again. — A man that knows men, in the street, at their work, human nature in its shirt-sleeves, — who makes bargains with deacons, instead of talking over texts with them, — a man who has found out that there are plenty of praying rogues and swearing saints in the world, — above all, who has found out, by living into the pith and core of life, that all of the Deity which can be folded up between the sheets of any human book is to the Deity of the firmament, of the strata, of the hot aortic flood of throbbing human life, of this infi- nite, instantaneous consciousness in which the soul's being consists, — an incandescent point in the filament connecting the negative pole of a past eternity with the positive pole of an eternity that is to come, — that all of the Deity which any human book can hold is to this larger Deity of the working battery of the universe only as the films in a book of gold-leaf are to the broad seams and curdled lumps of ore that lie in unsunned mines and virgin placers, — Oh! — I was saying that a man who lives out-of-doors, among live people, gets some things into his head he might not find in the index of his " Body of Divinity." I tell you what, — the idea of the professions' dig- ging a moat round their close corporations, like that AT THE BREAKFAST-TABLE. n Japanese one at Jeddo, which you could put Park- Street Church on the bottom of and look over the vane from its side, and try to stretch another such spire across it without spanning the chasm, — that idea, I say, is pretty nearly worn out. Now when a civilization or a civilized custom falls into senile dementia, there is commonly a judgment ripe for it, and it comes as plagues come, from a breath, — as fires come, from a spark. Here, look at medicine. Big wigs, gold-headed canes, Latin prescriptions, shops full of abominations, recipes a yard long, " curing '' patients by drugging as sailors bring a wind by whistling, selling lies at a guinea apiece — a routine, in short, of giving unfor- tunate sick people a mess of things either too odious to swallow or too acrid to hold, or, if that were pos- sible, both at once. — You don't know what I mean, indignant and not unintelligent country-practitioner ? Then you don't know the history of medicine, —and that is not my fault. But don't expose yourself in any outbreak of eloquence; for, by the mortar in which Anaxarchus was pounded ! I did not bring home Schenckius and Forestus and Hildanus, and all the old folios in calf and vellum I will show you, to be bullied by the pro- prietor of a "Wood and Bache," and a shelf of pep- pered sheepskin reprints by Philadelphia Editors. Besides, many of the profession and I know a little something of each other, and you don't think I am such a simpleton as to lose their good opinion by say- ing what the better heads among them would condemn as unfair and untrue ? Now mark how the great plague came on the generation of drugging doctors, and in what form it fell. 12 THE PROFESSOR A scheming drug-vendor, (inventive genius,) an utterly untrustworthy and incompetent observer, (pro- found searcher of Nature,) a shallow dabbler in eru- dition, (sagacious scholar,) started the monstrous fiction (founded the immortal system) of Homoe- opathy. I am very fair, you see, — you can help your- self to either of these sets of phrases. All the reason in the world would not have had so rapid and general an effect on the pubhc mind to dis- abuse it of the idea that a drug is a good thing in it- self, instead of being, as it is, a bad thing, as was produced by the trick (system) of this German char- latan (theorist). Not that the wiser part of the pro- fession needed him to teach them ; but the routinists and their employers, the '' general practitioners," who lived by selling pills and mixtures, and-