Class LBi£!X3__ Book L N4- I Ccpight]^'' COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY REVISED AND ENLARGED BY GEO. W. NEET, PROFESSOR OF PEDAGOGY IN THE VALPARAISO COLLEGE. VALPARAISO, INDIANA M. E. BOGARTE, PUBLISHER, 19 3. THE LIBRARY OF 1 CONGRESS, 1 Two Copies Receivefl SEP 21 1903 Copyright Entry :?>f AA. 4 A /^o3 cuss &y XXc. No rTC^fX^ \ COPY ,.«• 1 COPYRIGHTED 1903 BY GEO. W. NEET. PREFACE. It is fully appreciated that there are many books written during the present times for which there not only is no demand, but for which there is no excuse- The present little volume is not born of any desire to produce a book on pedagogy better than any yet writ- ten. It is, however, prompted by a desire to choose from the field of pedagogical science material well adapted to a special class of students, with which the writer has to deal in his daily teaching. The field of pedagogy is so large that material must be selected from it for those students who are just beginning the study of pedagogy. So it has been the aim in this little volume to select from this broad field and organize such material as is best adapted to students beginning this line of work. At the same time material has been selected whose study, it is believed, wiU be of substantial worth to teachers in giving them an insight into the nature of the teach- er's profession as well as knowledge valuable for guidance in teaching. While simplicity has been aimed at as much as possible, no effort has been made to avoid the most fundamental problems of pedagogy. IV STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. This book is prepared for the special purpose of use as a text-book in my own classes. Much which is the result of the most recent investigations along pedagogical lines is here arranged in a teachable and convenient form. Thus the study is brought up to date. An effort has been made to show where the pres- ent studies articulate with psychology, child-study and methods. G. W. N. CONTENTS. lAPTER '• PAGE. Introduction 9. I. The School - 13. II. The Purpose of the School 25. III. The Physical Nature of the Child - 38. IV. The Mental Nature of the Child 63. V. The Mental Nature of the Child - 84. VI. The School Curriculum - 122. VII. The Teacher - - 148. VIII. The Management of the School - 176 IX. The Process in the Teaching Act, — Method 208. X. The Recitation - - - - 231. Index - - . . - 245. INTROD UCTION. Pedagogy/. — This term is sometimes thought to^ name some particular school subject, the study of which will enable those who wish to teach school to do their work better than they could do it without such study. It is thought by some who have not been special students of it to name a subject as definite, with regard to the truth it teaches, as grammar, geometry, or physiology. Such, however, is a wrong notion of the meaning of the term, peda- gogy, as well as a wrong idea of the nature of the subject, pedagogy. Pedagogy is a term which names a group of subjects that have to do with both the science and art of education, and is not correctly to be thought as naming any one particular subject. The term, pedagogy, is from the Latin term, pced- agogus, which means a boy-leader or a child-leader. Thus from its literal meaning pedagogy should be something which has to do with leading children from a condition in which their unpreparedness for living is the greatest to one in which they live intensive and fruitful lives. And this is the correct use of the term, for it indicates the nature of the subject. Used in this sense pedagogy names a group of subjects which are called professional subjects. That is to say, they :X INTRODUCTION. tire subjects which the teacher should study with the special view of becoming more skillful in the art of teaching. Pedagogy thus embraces the group of professional subjects, psychology^ child-study, or paid- ology, methods, history of education, and philosophy of education. Guyau, a French educational writer of note de- :fines pedagogy as follows: "Pedagogy might be defined as the art of adapting new generations to those conditions of life which are the most intensive and fruitful for the Individual and the species." This definition emphasizes the art side of pedagogy, but it also has an important science aspect. It thus appears that two views of pedagogy may be found in the minds of teachers, as follows: 1. The view that pedagogy is a definite subject, such as history, etc. This view is not the correct one. 2. The view that pedagogy is a group of sub- jects — the professional subjects for the teacher. Paraphrasing Guyau 's definition and adding a little to it, we have the following definition for peda- gogy: Pedagogy is the science and the art of adapting new generations to those conditions of life most intensive and fruitful to the individual and the race. It will thus appear that the field of study in pedagogy which offers itself to teachers is a broad one, and one from which material especially suited must be chosen. It further appears that to become INTRODUCTION. XI to any great extent proficient in the pursuit of peda- gogy will require considerable time. Educational ideas have grown till it is no longer believed that one can become proficient in pedagogy by studying it for one or two school terms. This becomes evident when one thinks that to know pedagogy to any great extent is to know psychology, child-study, methodol- ogy, history of education, and philosophy of educa- tion. CHAPTER I. THE SCHOOL. The Beginning Point. — Prom the teacher's point of view all study of pedagogy centers around and is connected with the school. The term, -pedagogy^ is so closely connected with the school, and they have been associated together to such an extent that this term always suggests the school in some of its various aspects. For this reason pedagogy has come to be regarded a strictly professional line of work, and a more or less extended study of it is the teacher's distinctly prof essional preparation. So, as a starting place in the study of pedagogy, it seems eminently fitting to begin with the study of the school as a ivhole, since it is the institution in which the learner and the teacher meet in the educating process. The Nature of the School. — Among the ancients the school was a place of leisure, but it can scarcely be called such now. In its development it has be- come one of the fundamental organizations of society. The school is thus an organization, but it gives little or no help to know this unless the idea of an organi- zation is well understood. 14 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. The study of the human body as a type of an organization will reveal pretty well the thought sought for here. A somewhat careful study will show that the following points are to be found in the human body as an example of an organization: 1. A complex whole. 2. Individual parts. 3. The harmonious working relation of the parts. 4. A common purpose for which all the parts work. 5. Self -activity and self -adjustment of the whole and the parts. The body as one thing is a complex whole, since it may be analyzed into parts some of which are of more importance than others. The individual parts in this case are the organs of the body — the hands, the feet, the skin, the heart, the stomach, etc. They are individual parts because each one has some marks about it which distinguish it from everything else. All these organs work so as to help onean- other. Thus the hands help to care for the feet; the feet help to carry the hands from place to place; the feet and hands help to secure food to nourish the skin, heart, and stomach as well as themselves; the stomach helps to digest the food, and the heart pumps the blood enriched by the digested food to all parts of the body. All these parts do their work in such a way that, while each one does its own particular THE SCHOOL. 15^ work well, it in no way hinders any other part but also facilitates its work. If any part should work against another for a time, the organization would be- come impaired; if continued, the organization would be destroyed by breaking down the unity of its parts. The common end for which all the parts here work ia the maintenance of the body as a whole, which is also- the maintenance of the life of each part. The human body is self-adjusting in that, when out of order, it tends to adjust itself, and in most cases actually does so. It is self-active in that it has the power of originating its own activities — of causing itself to act. The analysis of the human body as an example of an organization reveals the essential ideas of any organization as we wish in our work to think it. Then, when we say the school is an organization,. we say it is a collection of individual parts, self-ad- justing and self-acting, working harmoniously to- gether for one common purpose. Thus the pupils, the teacher, the school curriculum, the school officers, the patrons, etc., are the individual parts; and the common purpose toward which they are harmo- niously working is the education of the learner physically, intellectually, cesthetically, socially, morally^ and religiously. The school, the church, the family, the state, and business society are organizations which are called the institutions of civilized life. These five institutions^ are the lines along which civilization has grown. 16 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. A further study of the institution, the school, leads into a discussion of the origin of the institu- tions, and particularly the origin of the school. Origin of the School. — The school had its origin in the differentiation of institutions. But this statement gives no help unless the meaning of differentiation is well understood. Differentiation has been called the law of all progress. That is to say, progress con- sists in the division of structure or of labor or of both, and when there is no differentiation of these there is no progress. Differentiation may be defined as a differencing, or division, of structure or labor to the end of more efficient work. Illustration. — The lowest forms of life are small animals and plants each consisting of but one small cell of protoplasm which does in a way the work that all the organs of higher living forms do for them. Thus this one cell performs all the functions of di- gestion, circulation, assimilation, muscular action, -etc., that are performed by the organs of higher forms of life. In these little living beings there is almost no differentiation of structure or function. But a little higher form of plant or animal life has many cells, some rudimentary digestive organs, and circulatory organs; and also rudimentary nervous, muscular, and supporting systems. The higher up in the scale of plant or animal life the being is, the more definite are the separate organs, THE SCHOOL. 17 and the more is their labor divided. For instance the robin or the geranium each has a definite set of organs for the performance of a definite set of functions. That is to say, they have a high degree of differentiation, while the one celled forms have none or nearly none. This means progress; for when an organ has but one kind of work to do, it can do that better than it can do many kinds of work. This is true because there is more time and energy to be spent upon this particular work. Differentiation of Institutions. — There was a time in primitive society during the childhood of the race when only one of these fundamental institutions of civilization was in existence. This institution was the family. It then had much work to do. It had to protect the children from enemies, both wild beasts and men, to furnish food, clothing and shelter. It had to educate the children in so far as they were educated; to furnish religious services, and provide means of enjoyment for leisure hours. With these manifold duties to perform the family could not be expected to do any of them very well, and we know that they were not well done. The protection fur- nished was poor; the food, clothing, and shelter were poor; the religion was crude and frequently degrad- ing; the right education of the children could not be given, and the pleasures were gross and debasing. It could be no other way under such conditions. That there was first a felt -need for the organl- 18 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. zation, the churchy after the family may seem strange, but history shows it is the truth. And when there is a strong felt-need for any thing, the thing is thus produced which will satisfy the need. Thus the second institution of society which came into exist- ence was the church as a product differentiated from the family. To say that the church had its origin in the thought that it as an institution could furnish gratification for man's religious impulses better than, the family could is a true statement. If such had not been the case, the church would have had no reason for coming into existence. The next institution to differentiate was doubt- less the school. It grew out of the thought that it as an institution could educate the children better than could be done by the family or the church, or by both. So the school had its origin in the thought that it as an institution could do the work of educating the children better than any other institution in existence. This is the thought that created it, and it is the sole purpose of the school to realize this thought; for it is the function of everything to realize the idea that created it, and the school accords to this law. Illustration. — It may be truly said that the idea which created the cotton-gin was the idea of some machine to separate the fiber of the cotton from the seed. And it is the purpose, or function, of the cot- ton-gin to realize this idea; that is, to do the work of separating the fiber of the cotton from the seed. THE SCHOOL. 19 This we know it does well, and its doing this well is what has kept the cotton-gin in existence. The origin of the state, and business life may be accounted for in the same way as the origin of the school; that is, they arose in the process of differ- entiation of the institutions. It is, however, our purpose here to study the origin of the school only. Differentiation in the School. — The first school was, doubtless, a very simple and primitive affair. It probably consisted of a few students congregated under the shade of some friendly tree to receive in- struction from one who occupied the place of teacher. Within the memory of men now living the school was very simple. The house was a log cabin containing almost no furniture; the curriculum was reading, writing, spelling, and arithmetic. The country school was Primary school, High school, Academy, Normal school. Technical school. College,, and University. But from this simple beginning by differentiation our schools have become quite complex and elaborate. There has been differentiation at any rate along four lines as follows: 1. In the school as a whole. 2. In the work of the teacher. 3. In the curriculum. 4. In the grading. Once there was nothing but the primary schools, but now there are Primary schools. High schools, Technical schools, Colleges, and Universities, each f20 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. with its own special work to do. Once a teacher ? taught everything in the school course, but now in ; many places there is a special teacher for each sub- . ject. The curriculum once consisting of only reading, writing, spelling, and arithmetic is now changed by '-differentiation to one consisting of the following .groups: 1. The language group. 2. The science group. 3. The history group. 4. The mathe- matical group. 5. The art group. Now the curriculum is quite complex and extensive. And lastly differen- tiation has brought about grading in our schools. The teacher in the first schools taught all grades, .while the tendency is now towards but one or two I grades for a teacher. This differentiation in all lines of school work : means progress. It means a saving of time and < energy. Division of labor, or differentiation, in the ; school means progress just as truly as it means progress in any kind of life. . Illustration. — Suppose the farmer, in addition to ; producing products of the farm, had to make his own machinery, grind his wheat and corn for flour and meal, tan the skins and make his boots and shoes, do his own carpenter work, saw his lumber, produce • <5otton, wool, and flax, weave them into cloth for cloth- ing, be his own doctor, dentist, lawyer, teacher, and preacher, none of these lines of work could be so well done as they now are when this labor is divided Tup among many persons. Time and energy would THE SCHOOL. 21 be lacking the farmer to do so many kinds of work well. Also, there is not only more energy to put on any one kind of work when labor is differentiated, but any one doing just one or two lines of work be- comes more skillful than he could become when doing many lines of work, and, thus, will do his work much better. The origin of the school thus being seen in the study of the differentiation of institutions, the next topic to invite study is the elements of the school. The Elements of the School. — It has been seen that the school is a complex whole; that is a whole made up of many parts, or elements, some of which are of less importance than others. These elements may be divided into two classes, and these classes may appropriately be called: 1. The necessary elements. 2. The supplementary elements. The necessary elements are those without which the school can not exist. The school is wholly for the learner, and without the learner there can be no school. So the learner is the first and most important of the necessary element^^ of the school. The learner makes necessary a teacher. While a school can not exist without the learner, no more can it exist with- out the teacher. The school finds the thought that created it in the process of fulfillment in the teaching act, but to have the teaching act requires a teacher. So the teacher is the second one of the necessary ^2 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. elements of the school. While the life of the learner is the thing to be developed always in teaching, it can not be developed without some subject or sub- jects for it to exercise upon. So a third element, the subjects of the school course, is also an absolute necessity. The term used to designate the school subjects,~reading, writing, spelling, geography, history, etc., — taken as a whole, is the school curricu- lum. With these three elements, the learner^ the teacher^ and the curriculum^ a school may exist, but take away any one or more of them and the school can not exist. Every school possesses other elements, which con- tribute to the efficiency of the work the school has to do, but which are not absolutely necessary to the existence of the school. These are the elements which have been called the supplementary elements of the school. They are the school officials^ the parents^ and the material equipments. The school officers are the directors, trustees, members of the school boards, superintendents of county, city, and state, the commissioner of education, and, in a sense, the legislators, governors, and the president of the country. The material equipments are school houses, school furniture, laboratories, library, apparatus, and school premises. Both of these classes of elements may exist, how- ever, and there still be no school. In order that there may be a school these elements, whether THE SCHOOL. 23 necessary or supplementary, few or many, must be organized, that is they must work in harmony with the law of the organization. This law is the law of unity. In order to understand this truth well, two words, law and unity , need special study. Laiu. — A law is a truth which is true of a large number of particular cases. Thus it is a law that plants require sunshine, moisture, and air for their growth. This is a truth which is true of a large number of particular plants, and these plants are the particular cases. Again it is a law that all material objects are drawn toward the center of 'the earth. This is a truth which is true of all material objects, and these objects are the particular cases. Urdty. — Unity as used here means oneness in thought, purpose, and effort. It means harmony in work and means. It is the harmonious working rela- tion in the organization. Thus there is unity between the student and the teacher when they are both working with the same thought in mind to accomplish the same end by the use of harmonious means. There is unity between parent and teacher when they are agreed as to the end to be attained in school work, and are also agreed on the means and are working to reach the desired end. The law of unity is the fundamental law of the school. This appears from the fact that when all the elements of the school are examined at the time at which the school is doing its best work, it is found 24 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. that it is when there is most unity; also, it is found that when the school is doing its poorest work, is when there is least unity. With the law of unity intact the school moves forward without a jar toward the accomplishment of its work — the education of the pupil. When the law is broken there always results discord and friction. Any one connected with the school, the teacher, the parent, the school officers, or the student may break the law of the school — the law of unity. When any one does so, he breaks a rule of the school, since the rules of the school are but different aspects of the law of unity. And he who breaks the law of unity in the school either intention- ally or unintentionally has committed an educational sin. Further Material for Study. — After studying the school as an institution of civilization, there remain to be studied the purpose, or aim, of the school; the necessary elements of the school; school management, the recitation^ etc. These will be studied in succeed- ing chapters. The purpose of the school is one with the end, or aim, of education; so a study of this leads to a study of the nature and purpose of education. The nature and purpose of education will constitute the subject-matter of study in the next chapter. CHAPTER II. THE PURPOSE OF THE SCHOOL. The Problem. — The purpose of the school is to^ educate the pupil. But what does it mean to educate the pupil? What sort of condition is the pupil to be in when he is educated? What is the meaning of what is called an education? These are some of the questions which suggest themselves at the outset of the study. The real problem is, What is the purpose of the school? and, since the purpose of the school is the same as the purpose of education, the problem is, What is the end to be reached in the educating process? That is to say, the question to be answered is, What is the aim, or purpose, of education? The Problem Ansioered. — There is scarcely an educational writer of note to be found who has not- dealt with this problem and who has not answered it in some way. This fact, that educators every- where have been thinking and writing upon this question, is evidence of the importance which school men think it to possess. It will prove helpful to study some of the answers to this very important question. Complete Living. — Mr. Herbert Spencer, doubt- less the greatest living thinker, says the purpose of '26 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. ^education is complete living. This when analyzed means: 1. Treating the body right. 2. Treating the mind right. 3. Managing one's affairs right. 4. Rearing a family right. 8. Behaving right as a citizen. 6. Spending one's leisure time right. This seems a broad and comprehensive view of the purpose of education. There is no kind of hu- man activity that this view of the aim of education does not touch. Granting that this is the true aim of education, then instruction in our schools, if in harmony with this aim, must give the pupil knowl- edge which will furnish guidance in these six kinds of activities. There must be knowledge gained which will furnish guidance in treating the body right; in treating the mind right; in managing one^s affairs right; in rearing a family right; in behaving right as a triangle, is made up of ideas, one, two, and three aibove. That is to say, it is made up of those attributes that could be found in any triangle. The following is the definition for a general idea: A general idea is an idea which corresponds to the common attributes of a class of objects. The terms, concept, general idea, and general notion, all have the same meaning. This should be remembered. The process in which concepts are formed is conception, and the definition is as follows: Conception is the mind^s process of forming an idea which corresponds to the common attributes of a class of objects. Method of Forming Concepts in Actual Life. — In actual life concepts are formed as follows: first, the mind perceives an object of a class for the first time 106 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. and gets a sort of tentative concept which usually contains attributes not possessed by all the objects of the class; secondly, the mind perceives other objects of this kind and begins to drop from the concept any attributes which are not common and perhaps to add some common attributes not at first perceived; this process of changing the concept because of further experience is continued until just those attributes which belong to every object of the class remain. Illustration. — The mind naturally gets its general Ideas from the study of particulars. Suppose the first barn a child sees is a square one, painted red, with roof sloping but one way, and containing only hay and corn. From this particular the mind's idea of barn will contain square form, red color^ this par- ticular kind of roof, and filled ivith hay and corn. To be brief, the mind from the study of particulars goes on correcting its idea of barn by dropping out elements, and possibly adding some, until just those attributes remain which are possessed in common by barns. This is the way the mind naturally gets its con- cepts in life. When it examines the first particular, it forms a tentative, or trial, concept. But it goes on and examines other particulars to correct this ten- tative concept. It should be noted carefully that the mind naturally examines the real, particular object of which it forms its concepts. The Logical Steps in Conception. — The following are the logical steps in an act of conception: THE MENTAL NATURE OF THE CHILD. 107 1. The mind acts an activity appropriate to a particular object by thinking several of its attributes. 2. The mind repeats this process with other similar objects. 3. The mind compares and contrasts these ob- jects. 4. The mind abstracts the common attributes by holding them in consciousness and dropping more or less from consciousness the others. 5. The mind generalizes by extending the com- mon attributes of the particulars studied out to all objects of the class. 6. The mind thinks the name of the class. The first two steps may be put together, thus making but five steps as follows: (1) the examination of particulars; (2) comparison and contrast; (3) ab- straction; (4) generalization; (5) denomination. The Asjoects of the Concept. — The concept has two aspects: intension^ and extension, or intent and extent. When the mind thinks the general idea, triangle, it thinks the common attributes which make up the idea, but it also thinks of the particular objects to which the concept applies. In the first case the mind is thinking of the intension, intent, or content — these terms all have the same meaning — of the concept. In the second case the mind is thinking of the ex- tension, or extent, of the concept. The following are statements for these two aspects of the concept: The intension of a concept is that aspect of the concept 108 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. which refers to the number of common attributes in it. The extension of a concept is that aspect of the concept which refers to the number of particular objects to ivhich it applies. Definition. — The popular notion of definition is that it is some sort of formal statement, either oral or written, to be learned and remembered. But definition in its essential nature is a mental process, and sufiiciently distinct to be regarded a stage in the development of knoiuing. An examination of how the mind naturally forms a definition will reveal the nature of the process. Let the thing to be defined be the triangle. The mind examines a particular triangle, noting its at- tributes; then it examines a second triangle, noting its attributes; then a third, and so on. The mind compares these various particular triangles and selects out their common attributes. It finds them as follows: 1. The triangle is a polygon. 2. It has three sides. 3. It has three angles. The mind now makes a synthesis of these com- mon truths of triangles in the form of a thought, which gives the following: A triangle is a polygon having three sides and three angles. This, it is evident, is a definition of the triangle, and the mind's process of arriving at this mental product is the mental process of definition. THE MENTAL NATURE OP THE CHILD. 109 From the above the following definition of defini- tion is reached: Definition is the mind^s process of making a syn- thesis of the common attributes of a class of objects in the form of a thought. For instance, the mind examines several par- ticular nouns in sentences, and sees the following truths of each one: 1. It is a substantive word. 2. It names the object which it expresses. The mind makes a synthesis of these truths as follows: A noun is a substantive luord which names its object. But this defines the noun. In making a definition the mind takes the follow- ing steps: 1. It thinks the name of the thing to be defined. 2. It puts the thing to be defined in the next larger known class. 3. It sets the thing to be defined off from all other things of this class. For instance, in the definition of the sentence, *^The sentence is that language unit which expresses a thought,^* ^^The sentence'^ names what is to be defined; ^Hs that language unif* puts the thing to be defined into the class, language units, the next known class larger than the sentence; and ^^ which expresses a thought" sets the sentence off from the other things of the class, the ivord and discourse. The thing defined is always a class. When the mind defines a prism, the definition is not for some 110 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. particular prism, but it is for the class, prism. Thus, a definition must include all the particulars of the class to be defined. • That is to say, it must be in- clusive. The definition must also exclude everything except the particulars of the class defined; that is, it must be exclusive. The mind's natural mode of defining is thus as follows: V. The mind examines particular objects of the class to be defined. 2\ The mind selects out the common attributes of these particular objects. 3^ The mind makes a synthesis of these com- mon attributes in the form of a thought by: V. Thinking the name of the class to be defined. 2^ Putting the thing to be defined into the next larger known class. 3^ Setting the thing to be defined off from all other things of that class. Laws of Definition. — Thus to guide in making definitions the following laws may be formulated: 1. Name the thing to he defined. 2. Put the thing to he defined into the next larger known class. 3. Set the thing to he defined off from all other things of tJiat class. Judgment. — The mind gets particular ideas through sense-perception, and general ideas through THE MENTAL NATURE OF THE CHILD. Ill ccnception. In judgment the mind grasps and em- phasizes the relation between ideas. For example, the mind of man had an idea, coal^ and the idea, fuely for years before it ever grasped the relation between, those ideas. When at last it did, it asserted that coal is a fuel This process of grasping the relation be- tween the idea, coal^ and the idea, fuel^ and asserting it is the mind's process of judging. Thus the defini- tion of judgment is as follows: Judgment is the mincfs process of grasping the relation between ideas and asserting it. The product of an act of sense-perception is a percept; of an act of conception, a concept; of an act of definition, a definition; of an act of judgment, a judg- ment. Every judgment is expressed by a sentence, if expressed at all. Thus the sentence is the symbol of the judgment. It is commonly said that the sentence expresses the thought^ and this is right, because the thought and the judgment mean precisely the same thing. The sentence, then, bears the relation to the judgment of the symbol to the thing symbolized. And the judgment bears the relation to the sentence of the thing symbolized to the symbol. The act of judging is a triple activity of the mind; that is, a one act made up of three. The following are the steps in judging: 1. The mind acts some idea. 112 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. 2. The mind acts a second idea related to the first. 3. The mind grasps and asserts the relation be- tween these ideas. The Elements of the Judgment. — Since there are three activities in making every judgment, there are three essential elements in every judgment: the 'psychical subject, the psychical predicate, and the psy- chical copula. The following are definitions for them: The psychical subject is the idea of the object about which something is asserted. The psychical predicate is the idea of that which is asserted about the object of which the subject of the judgment is the idea. The psychical copula is the idea of the relation J)etween the subject of the judgment and the predicate of the judgment. The Two Aspects of Judgments. — Judgments have two aspects: intension and extension. The inten- sion and extension of judgments are not so much two separate things as the two different aspects of the same thing. Thus every judgment is at one time both a judgment of intension and extension. If the mind thinks man is an animal, it may refer the sub- ject, the idea, man, to the predicate, the idea, animal, with the idea of extending or universalizing the subject, for animal is a larger class than man. In this case the judgment is one of extension. But if the mind refers the predicate, ths idea, animal, to the sub- THE MENTAL NATURE OF THE CHILD. 113 ject, the idea, man, with the idea of enriching the subject in meaning by adding the element of animal to it, the judgment is one of intension. Reasoning. — In judgment the mind emphasizes the relation between ideas. In reasoning it empha- sizes the relation among judgments. In every act of reasoning there are three judgments involved, so related that the last is reached because of its relation to the other two. Thus having the two judgments, ^ ^ Man is mortal, ^^ and ^^ William is a man," the mind reaches the third judgment, ^^ William is mortal,'^ and this process of the mind is reasoning. The definition is as follows: Reasoning is the mincVs process of reaching a judg- ment because of its relation to tivo preceding judgments. The Classes of Reasoning. — There are different classes of reasoning depending upon the basis chosen. Often the mind produces a judgment when it is not at all conscious that this judgment is reached be- cause of its relation to two preceding judgments, but an analysis always shows that the two preceding judgments are implied, though not in consciousness. Thus there are two kinds of reasoning from the standpoint of whether all three of the judgments are in consciousness. Thus when the mind thinks This day is rainy, it has as a rule, in consciousness only this one judgment. An analysis shows that the two judgments, rainy days have certain characteristics; and this day has these characteristics; are implied, however. 114 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. Then again, the mind in reasoning examines par- ticular objects and reasons that what is true of these is true of the whole class; that is, it goes from the examination of particulars to a general truth. Also the mind may start with a general truth and reason that what is true of the whole class must be true of the particular objects of that class. Thus from the standpoint of whether the mind goes from particulars to the general or from the general to particulars there are two classes of reasoning. Implicit and Explicit Reasoning, — On the basis of whether the mind has in consciousness all three judgments there are two classes of reasoning: im- plicit^ and explicit. Implicit reasoning is the kind of reasoning in which one or more of the judgments are not in conscious- ness. Explicit reasoning is the kind of reasoning in which the mind has all the judgments in consciousness. Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. — On the basis of whether the mind goes from the particular to the general or from the general to the particular there are two classes of reasoning: inductive and deductive. Inductive reasoning is that kind of reasoning in which the mind goes from truths of particular objects to general truths. Ex. — This object is an animal. This object has voluntary motion. Animals have voluntary motion. THE MENTAL NATURE OF THE CHILD. 115 Deductive reasoning is that kind of reasoning in which the mind goes from general truths to truths of particular objects. Ex. — Animals have voluntary motion. This object is an animal. This object has voluntary motion. The Syllogism. — In every act of reasoning there are three judgments, or propositions. These three judgments, or propositions, taken together are called the syllogism. Thus the syllogism may be characterized as follows: The syllogism is the formal act of reasoning con- sisting of three judgments, or propositions. Of the three judgments which compose the syllo- gism the first two are called the premises, diXidi the last one, the conclusion. There are in each syllogism also three terms: the major term, the minor term, and the middle term. These may be known from their position in the judgments. The predicate of the conclusion is invariably the major term; the subject of the conclusion, the minor term, and the term found in both the premises but not found in the conclusion is the middle term. The premises are called major or minor depend- ing upon which term is found in them, the major term being always found in the major premise, and the minor term, in the minor premise. Thus in the syllogism, — This object is an animal. 116 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. This object has voluntary motion. Animals have voluntary motion. *'have voluntary motion" is the major term; *' Ani- mals" is the minor term; and '^This object" is the middle term. Also, "Animals have voluntary motion" is the conclusion. "This object has voluntary mo- tion" is the major premise, and "This object is an animal" is the minor premise. The arrangement of the judgments in a certain order is called a figure of the syllogism. There are said to be three figures of the syllogism, as follows: I. Animals have voluntary motion. This object is an animal. This object has voluntary motion. II. Animals have voluntary motion. This object has voluntary motion. This object is an animal. III. This object is an animal. This object has voluntary motion. Animals have voluntary motion. The first figure of the syllogism is employed by the mind in deduction; the second, in identiJiGation; and the third, in induction. Systematization. — In judgment the mind grasps the relation betv^een ideas; in reasoning, betvreen judgments; and in systematization, between complete acts of reasoning. Thus by systematization the THE MENTAL NATURE OF THE CHILD. 117 mind connects all the truths of plant life into a com- plete system — the science of botany; also, all the truths of animal life into the science, zoology. Systematization is the mind^s process of grasping the relation between complete acts of reasoning. Intuition. — To know any object completely is to know it in both its particular and universal aspects; that is, (1) to know it as distinct from other objects, (2) as connected with other objects. In the stages in the development of knowing from sense-perception to imagination, inclusive, the mind emphasizes the particular aspects of known objects; but in the development of knowing from conception to systematization, inclusive, the mind em- phasizes the universal aspects of objects. Thus in no stage of knowing from sense-perception to systema- tization does the mind grasp an object with equal emphasis upon both its particular and universal aspects. This it does in the highest stage of know- ing, intuition. Intuition in its fuUness is thus knowing an object completely, and is thus the end of the development of knowing. It may be defined as follows: Intuition is the mincVs pi^ocess of implicitly grasp- ing an object ivith equal emphasis upon both its particular and universal aspects. Intuition is rational insight. The Distinguishing Element in the Stages of Knoio- ing. — By the distinguishing element in the stages of 118 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. knowing is meant that element which makes any stage different from any other stage, and by which any stage may be known. The distinguishing element in sense-perception is the interpreting the sensations; in memory, the iden- tifying activity; in imagination, the free imaging activ- ity of the mind; in conception, the grasping the class common attributes; in definition, the synthesis of the common truths of a class; in judgment, the grasping the relation between ideas; in reasoning, the grasping the relation between judgments; in systematization, the grasping the relation among complete acts of reasoning; in intuition, the equality of emphasis on both aspects of an object, the particular and universal. The Advance in the Stages of Knotoing. — The sen- sation in itself is an isolated thing. In sense-percep- tion the mind relates the sensations and grasps the likeness and difference between them. Its advance over the sensation is in grasjying the relation between the sensations. In original sense-perception, the least developed kind, the mind interprets the sensations from only one sense, that one which was evidently designed to give sensations of one particular kind. In the acquired sense-perception, the most developed kind, more than one sense is involved, and thus more relations are grasped and the process is more com- plex — more developed. In memory, the second stage of knowing, the mind grasps more time and place relations than in THE MENTAL NATURE OP THE CHILD. 119 sense-perception. In sense-perception the mind can deal with only present, in time and space, objects. Thus it is a great advance to be able to think of objects not present in either time or space. Recognition, the lowest kind of memory, is a very small advance over sense-perception, merely Tnore time relations grasped. Remembrance of the particular is an advance over recognition in that the object is never present — TYiore place relations grasped. In remembrance of the general the mind ad- vances to the grasping of general relations. The mind deals with particular ideas in both recognition and remembrance of the particular, but with a general idea in remembrance of the general. In recollection, the highest kind of memory, the advance is in the effort of the will involved and in the graspi/ng more relations in the attempt to get hold of some associated line to suggest the missing element. In imagination the mind advances over memory (1) in grasping more time relations; (2) in filling out the discrepancies of memory in its effort to remember a thing completely; and (3) in the freedom of the ac- tivity. In reproductive imagination, the least developed kind, the mind advances just a little beyond memory. The advance is mainly that of supplying the discrep- ancies of memory. 120 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. In mechanical imagination the advance over the reproductive is the greater freedom of the idealizing activity. In the creative imagination the advance is in the greater number of relations grasped because of the freedom of the ideaUzing activity of the mind. The advance of conception over the stages of knowing below it is that of shifting the mind's em- phasis from the particular to the class common attributes of objects. Sense-perception and imagination, the idea-forming stages of knowing below conception, give particular ideas; conception, also an idea- forming stage of knowing, advances to the general idea. The advance in definition over conception is found in the mind's effort to make explicit what it only vaguely grasps in conception — the distinct sepa- ration of the different classes of things. The advance in judgment is in grasping and em- phasizing the relation between ideas of any kind what- ever; that is, in reaching out for more relations. The advance in reasoning is grasping the relation J)etween entire judgments, a further broadening of the relations grasped. The advance of systematization over reasoning is in grasping the relations among complete acts of reason- ing. In intuition the advance is in the equal emphasis of the mind in grasping an object in both its universal and particular aspects. This is the most complete THE MENTAL. NATURE OF THE CHILD. 121:. knowing of an object and with it the development of: knowing ends. CHAPTER VI. THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. Meaning of the Term. — The curriculum is the school course of study. It is made up of the various subjects studied in school. Thus in the primary, or common, school the curriculum consists of reading, writing, spelling, arithmetic, grammar, primary language, history, geography, physiology, and in some places music, and drawing. In the secondary, or high, school it usually consists of algebra, and geometry; Latin, composition, rhetoric, and literature; botany, zoology, chemistry, physics, geology, and astronomy; ancient history, mediaeval history, and modern history; drawing, and music. It is easily seen that the school curriculum is not a fixed thing, but that it changes from time to time. The subjects in the school curriculum taken as a whole divide themselves into groups. There are at any rate the following groups: 1. The language group consisting of reading, writing, spelling, language, composition, rhetoric, grammar, Latin, literature, German, French, etc. 2. The mathematical group consisting of arith- metic, algebra, geometry, trigonometry, etc. THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 123 3. The natural science group consisting of physi- ology, geography, botany, zoology, psychology, chem- istry, physics, astronomy, geology, etc. 4. The history grouj) consisting of ancient history, mediaeval history, and modern history. 5. The art group consisting of drawing, and music, at the least. 6. The 2^'i^of^ssional group consisting of psy- chology, methodology, paidology, etc. Origin of the Curriculum. — The function of the school is to educate the child. But the child must have something to study that he may get knowledge and discipline in the process of education. Thus there are two aspects of the thought which originated the school curriculum: the idea of getting useful knowledge, and the idea of getting mental discipline. The foremost one of these ideas was the need for useful knowledge. So it may be said that the first felt-need which w^as instrumental in originating the school curriculum was the felt-need for useful knowl- edge. And by useful knowledge is meant knowledge which furnishes one guidance in right living. The second felt-need which was instrumental in originating the school curriculum was the felt-need for discipline; that is, for mental exercise to the end of health and growth. It was recognized that the mind must have exercise to maintain its health, and also to grow. 124 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. The curriculum at one time consisted of nothing more than reading, "writing, spelhng, and arithmetic. It was called the ''three r's, " when it was thus sim- ple, — "readin, ritin, rithmetic, " spelling being in- cluded in "ritin." There was a need for some subject in the curriculum the study of which would make the children skillful in the two following things: 1. Getting thought and feeling from pieces of discourse. 2. Communicating this thought and feeling orally in the author's own words. This need was the origin of reading as a subject in the school curriculum. And the purpose of read- ing in the school course is to satisfy this need. Again there was a need for something in the school course which would make the children skillful in the art of making the correct written forms by means of which thought and feeling are commu- nicated. This need was the origin of spelling and writing in the curriculum. And the purpose of spelling and writing in the school course is to satisfy this need. In dealing with the world of objects the mind needed to be skillful in measuring them. In carrying on business transactions the things exchanged had to be measured, and skill was needed. So there was a need for some subject in the school course the study of which would give the children skill in measuring. THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 125 This need brought arithmetic into the school cur- riculum, and was thus its origin. And the purpose of arithmetic in the schools is to make the children skillful in measuring. In a similar way we could trace out the origin of every study in the school curriculum, but it will probably be more helpful to do that under the head of- The Groivth of the Cui'riculum. — As stated above the school curriculum of the primary, or common, school, at one time consisted barely of reading, writ- ing, spelling, and arithmetic. But it has not remained so. Many new subjects have been added. That is to say, the school curriculum has grown. It is interesting to trace out the ideas which brought the subjects into the school curriculum as it grew, and to compare those ideas with what these subjects actually do for those who study them. That is, to see whether these subjects have realized in the lives of the children the things which they were expected to realize. It was seen that some subject needed to be in the school curriculum whose study would give the pupils the habit of using good language in communicating their thoughts and feelings. So grammar was added to satisfy this need, and for a long time it was ex- pected that the study of grammar would actually give the pupils the habit of using good language in writing and speaking. Finally it became evident that 126 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. grammar was not doing this well enough. The need for some subject to do this was still strongly felt. So the next attempt to satisfy this need brought primary language as a subject into the curriculum. The question whether language lessons as usually taught will satisfy this want suggests itself. It was also felt that, since so much of life's suc- cess and happiness depends upon the health of the physical being, something ought to be added to the curriculum, the study of which would give knowl- edge valuable for guidance in maintaining the health of the body. Thus physiology and hygiene were added to the school curriculum to satisfy this want. Man learns by experience and by example; that is, by his own experiences and by the experiences of others. He must depend upon the experiences of the race for a large part of his knowledge. These ex- periences of the race have been preserved in recorded history; and these experiences thus recorded are the heritage left by the race to humanity. There was felt a need for some subject in the school curriculum the study of which would bring the child into possession of the thought and feeling of the race as manifested in history, and this need caused history to be added to the school curriculum- Life of all kinds is very dependent. Plant life depends upon heat, light, and moisture; animal life of all kinds is dependent upon plant life and other animal life; and the human being is dependent upon THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 127 all these things along with his dependence upon his fellow men. This mutual dependence of life, veg- etable, animal, and human upon one another, and upon heat, light, and moisture has led to the wide distribution of life over the surface of the earth. There was a need felt for some subject whose study would give the child a knowledge of the mutual distribution of heat, light, moisture, relief forms^ plant life, animal life, and human life on the surface of the earth. Geography was added to the school curriculum to satisfy this want, and this was the origin of geography in the curriculum. Enriching the Curriculum. — Within recent years there has been much discussion on enriching the school curriculum of the primary school. By en- riching it, is meant the addition of new subjects to it and the bringing down some subjects which were formerly taught only in the advanced grades to the lower grades. In line with this thought literature^ music^ draiv- ing, and nature study have been introduced into many primary school curricula, and history, ge- ography, etc. have been placed in the work of the first, second, third, and fourth years. The main purpose in making this change has been to make a school curriculum better adapted to the child's mental development in the first three or four years of his school life than the one composed almost wholly of reading, writing, spelling, and "128 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. arithmetic. It was thought that the first work of the child in school was not well adapted to his stage of physical and mental development, and that, there- fore, was not of a character to arouse an enduring, drawing interest in school work. So the need for work more interesting to the child than the formal work in reading, writing, spelling, and number, is largely the thing which has produced these changes in the curriculum. A Rational Curriculum. — The school curriculum lias been criticised on the ground that it is not ra- tional; that is, it is not reasonable. The question, What is a rational school curriculum? at once suggests itself. Let us study this question systematically for 4a time. All would no doubt agree that that school cur- ricTilum is the most reasonable which is best adapted to the needs of the learner's life. And all would also ^gree that that school curriculum which wastes the learner's time and breaks down his health is not a reasonable one. Then if in some way it can be de- termined what school curriculum is best adapted to the learner's life, it may be known what a rational school curriculum is. In order to proceed in a systematic study of the curriculum it is necessary to rethink the purpose of the educating process. The Purpose of Education. — Herbert Spencer, it "iRdU be remembered, says the purpose of education THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 129 is complete living. And there is unanimity of opinion among thinking people everywhere on this point. Certainly any work in the educating process is to be regarded as good or poor accordingly as it helps much or little in right living. The evidence that people generally estimate the value of any subject in the school curriculum in terms of living is, that when any one wants to show the value of any school sub- ject, he attempts to show how it helps in life. Thus the teacher of French, when he wishes to show the value of the study of French, always does it in terms of life; the German teacher, and the Latin teacher endeavor to show the use of German and Latin in living. It was previously seen that "complete living** means the following: 1. Treating the body right, 2. Treating the mind right. 3. Managing one's business right. 4. Rearing a family right. 5. Behaving right as a citizen. 6. Spending one's leisure time right. The Test. — The only rational mode of judging the value of any school curriculum is to judge to what degree it discharges the function of preparing for right living. The test is as follows: Any subject is valuable in the school curriculum just to the degree to which it helps in right living. The First Step in Applying the Test. — The first step in applying this test to the school curriculum is to classify f in order of importance^ the lines of activity 130 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. ivhich make up human life. These are as follows: 1. Those activities put forth in direct self-preservation. 2. Those activities put forth in indirect self-preser- vation. 3. Those activities put forth in rearing a family. 4. Those activities put forth in performing the duties of citizenship. 5. Those activities put forth in spending one's leisure time. The Order of Importance of These Lines. — A little study shows that these lines of activities have been arranged in the order of decreasing importance. The activities put forth in direct self-preservation — those in getting out of the way of objects which would in- jure, avoiding danger, eating, drinking, protecting ourselves, etc. — are first in importance. If one were as ignorant as an infant of his environment, he would lose his life in less than a day, unless he had some one to care for him. And, since absolute ignorance of all other things would not bring death so quickly, those activities spent in direct self-preservation and that knowledge which furnishes guidance for these activities are of foremost importance. The activities spent in indirect self-preservation — those activities in securing food, clothing, and shelter — are second in importance. That these activities precede in importance those put forth in rearing families may be seen from the fact that self- main- tenance makes possible those activities employed in rearing families. Without self -maintenance first there could be no family life. Thus the activities put THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 131 forth in indirect self-preservation are second in im- portance only to those needful in direct self-preser- vation. No social life would be possible without the family. The family is the most fundamental social institution, and the rearing of children alone makes possible the church, state, etc. Then those activities employed in bringing up children are more important than those spent in performing the duties of citizen- ship. Again the goodness of society as a whole depends upon the goodness of those individuals who compose it, and the quality of the individuals depends largely upon the family training. Therefore those activities put forth in rearing a family are third in importance. Fourth in importance are those activities put forth in fulfilling one's duties as a citizen. This ap- pears from the fact that of all the lines of activities making up life, those used in spending leisure time could be best left out of life. Also, the various forms of pleasurable activities which fill up leisure hours presuppose social institutions. No great degree of development of these pleasurable occupations is possible without well established social institutions. Fifth and last in the lines of activities which make human life are the activities spent in leisure time. The Rational Order of Education. — From the fore- going, the following is seen to be the rational order 132 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. of education: 1. That education which prepares for direct self-preservation. 2. That education which prepares for indirect self-preservation. 3. That education which prepares for parenthood, and the bringing up of a family. 4. That education which prepares one for the duties of citizenship. 5. That education which prepares for spending right one's leisure time. While there may be particular exceptions and modifications of this order in the lives of some indi- viduals, yet there remain these marked divisions, and they subordinate one another substantially as indi- cated. The Second Step in Applying the Test. — The second step in applying the test is to classify knowledge in the order of its importance. Not all knowledge is of equal value to the human race. Some may have a vital bearing upon all human life for all time; some may touch the lives of only a few for only a brief time; and some may be so re- motely related to human life as to have almost no bearing upon it. Accordingly knowledge has been classified as follows: 1. Knowledge of intrinsic value. 2. Knowledge of quasi-intrinsic value. 3. Knowledge of conventional value. Knowledge of intrinsic value is that knowledge 'which bears upon the life of all mankind throughout all time. The knowledge that chlorine is a disin- fectant; that tuberculosis is a disease caused by a THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 133 germ; that every thought or feeling one has burns away some of his brain material, and scientific knowl- edge in general, is knowledge of intrinsic value. These truths will have a bearing on human conduct for all time. The extra knowledge of the English language which the study of Greek and Latin gives is knowl- edge of quasi-intrinsic value. It has a value to a part of humanity for a part of time, but is not of value to all mankind for all time. Knowledge of conventional value is simply fashionable knowledge. Gossip, neighborhood and national, much of Greek and Latin taught in school, and some parts of history are knowledge of only con- ventional value. Much that is taught in the subjects above mentioned scarcely has the remotest bearing ui)on human activities. It is fashionable to learn such things, and so people go on studying them with- out ever having thought out what bearing they reaUy have on human life. Thus in estimating the value of knowledge, knowledge of intrinsic value is of first importance. The Value of Learning. — The process of learning is valuable from two points of view. First, knowledge is obtained which furnishes guidance in human con- duct. Secondly, the mind gets healthful exercise in its efforts to learn. The mind develops by exercise; that is, it learns to do by doing. The exercise of the mind to the end of maintaining its health, and develop- 134 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. ing its strength is what is called mental discipline. Thus any learning has two values: 1. A knowledge- giving value. 2. A disciplinary value. Thoughts to Be Kept in Mind. — In the further study of the school curriculum, in order to system- atize the study, the following thoughts should be kept in mind: 1. Life is divided into several lines of activity of decreasing importance. 2. Knowledge is of three kinds according to its worth: a. Knowledge of intrinsic value, b. Knowl- edge of quasi-intrinsic value, c. Knowledge of conventional value. 3. Learning always has two values: a. A knowledge-giving value, b. A disciplinary value. Disciplinary Value and Knowledge -giving Value Not Antagonistic. — There is an error current to a large extent that some subjects are needed in the school curriculum because they have an excellent disciplinary value, even though their study does not give knowledge of much use in guiding one in right living; and another aspect of the same error is, that some subjects are needed in the school curriculum because of the useful knowledge their pursuit gives, even though their study does not furnish good mental discipline. This error in its two aspects has entered entirely too largely into the considerations in making school curricula in the past. It is quite possible that those THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 135 subjects whose pursuit gives knowledge the most useful for guidance in right living are the very same ones whose pursuit gives the best disciphne. And there is no lack of subjects to make a curriculum which will give the most valuable knowledge and at the same time give the very best discipline. Human life is too short to study one set of subjects for valu- able knowledge alone, and to study another set of subjects for discipline alone. In the solution of any educational problem hints usually may be had from nature. Everywhere in nature we find capacities developed by performing the functions which it is their office to perform, and not by some exercise artificially arranged to fit them for the performance of these duties. The hunter ac- quires the discipline which makes him a successful hunter only by the pursuit of game. The highest de- velopment of a j^ower alivays results from the exercise in the work which the conditions of life require of it. In the light of these truths, the acquisition which gives the most valuable knowledge must at the same time furnish the very best discipline. Making discipline almost the entire object in teaching ' 'is responsible for a sort of mediaeval dia- lectics and fruitless beating of the air in teaching which passes as superfine method. It is Fichte's idealism and subjectivity run mad." Direct Self-preservation. — The knowledge which gives guidance in direct self-preservation, too im- 136 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. portant to be left to be taught in school, Nature has taken into her own hands to teach. She is teaching the child his daily lessons in direct self-preservation by means of the falls, bruises, scratches, cuts, burns, and pains which befall him every day in his early life. Mother Nature teaches the lesson well that, when any of the laws of life are violated, pain and misery are the inevitable result. Not being aware of all the safeguards which nature has furnished us, we often violate her laws. What subjects have we in the school curriculum whose pursuit will furnish knowledge for guidance in these activities? The answer to this question is, we have 'physiology and hygiene. The pursuit of these subjects gives the knowledge that one's physical sensations and desires — cold, heat, fatigue, hunger, thirst, etc. — are promptings which, if obeyed, would to a large extent provide for direct self-preservation. But so great an ignorance is there of the laws of life that men do not appreciate fully enough that the sensations are the natural guides in direct self-pres- ervation. Physiology and hygiene have it as their field of work to teach a better general knowledge of the laws of physical life and a fuller appreciation of the ne- cessity and momentous importance of their obedience. No one will doubt the value of physiology and hygiene in the school curriculum who will consider the pain, the weariness, the gloom, the waste of time THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 137" and money entailed, and ''how greatly ill-health hinders the discharge of all duties, makes business often impossible and always more difficult; produces an irritability fatal to the right management of chil- dren; puts the function of citizenship out of the question; and makes amusement a bore. Is it not clear that the physical sins, partly our forefathers' and partly our own, which produce this ill-heaithj deduct more from complete living than any thing else, and to a great extent make life a failure and a burden instead of a benefaction and a pleasure?" And it may further be added that the average length of human life is, by the violation of these physical laws, largely cut short. Physiology and hygiene may thus be seen to occupy a dignified and exalted position in the school curriculum. And this is a fact which should be seen and appreciated by every teacher that these sciences may be taught conscientiously and well. Indirect Self-preservation. — The knowledge which furnishes guidance in indirect self-preservation is that which guides in making a living — in obtaining food, clothing, and shelter. All persons are agreed upon the importance of such knowledge; and indeed^ by too many it is regarded as the sole or main object of education. While every one is agreed that knowl- edge which furnishes guidance in making a living is of high importance, yet few have systematically thought out just what knowledge will best do this. 138 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. In order to study this question to the best ad- vantage, it is necessary to notice the main things in which men who work are employed. What Things Men Are Employed in. — The main lines in which men who work for a Hving are employed are as follows: 1. The production of commodities. 2. The preparation of commodities. 3. The distribution of commodities. By the production of commodities is meant the production of corn, wheat, hay, oats, beef, pork, coal, iron, wool, flax, poultry, fruit, lumber, leather, silk, cotton, linen, hemp, and a large number of other similar things. The preparation of commodities means changing them into a fit condition for consumption, or use. It refers mainly to manufacturing; as the manufacture of machinery, food, clothing, etc. Distribution refers to sending such things to the points of consumption. Now, the question is. What knowledge gives the greatest guidance in these three lines of activities? It is evident that commodities could not be dis- tributed without a knowledge of reading, writing, spelling, and arithmetic. Distribution requires railroads, canals, bridges, docks, and the dredging of rivers; locomotives, cars, steamboats, and steam- ships. But the knowledge which guides in the construction of these is a knowledge of mathematics, THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 139 physics, chemistry, and mechanics. Thus the knowl- edge which gives guidance in the distribution of commodities is, directly, mathematics, physics, chemistry, and mechanics; and indirectly, reading, writing, arithmetic, and spelling. That knowledge which guides in the preparation of commodities is, again, directly, a knowledge of chemistry, physics, mathematics, and mechanics; and indirectly, reading, writing, spelling, and arith- metic. That knowledge which gives guidance in the production of commodities is, directly, chemistry, physics, geology, zoology, botany, agriculture, horti- culture, and bacteriology; and indirectly, reading, writing, spelling, and arithmetic. Thus it is seen that subjects whose study furnishes knowledge which gives guidance in both direct and indirect self-preservation directly are al- most wholly science subjects. The Bearing of a Family. — One is led to wonder, when he thinks of our school curriculum, whether this division of human activities is to be considered of so little importance that no systematic knowledge is needed to furnish guidance for them. "If by some strange chance not a vestige of us descended to the remote future save a pile of our school books or some college examination papers, we may imagine how puzzled an antiquary of the period would be on finding in them no indications that the 140 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. learners were ever likely to be parents. 'This must have been the curriculum for their celibates,' we may fancy him concluding. *I perceive here an elaborate preparation for many things: especially for reading the books of extinct nations and coexisting nations — from which indeed it seems that these people had very little worth reading in their own tongue; but I find no reference whatever to the bringing up of children. They could not have been so absurd as to omit all training for this gravest of responsibilities. Evidently then, this was the school course of one of their monastic orders.' " There are however in the school curriculum physiology and hygiene whose pursuit will give knowledge which furnishes guidance in bringing up children, in so far as the laws of their bodies are concerned. But not enough emphasis is placed upon these subjects. The value of the knowledge furnished by their study has not yet been sufficiently appre- ciated. 'To tens of thousands that are killed, add hundreds of thousands that survive with feeble con- stitutions, and millions that grow up with constitu- tions not as strong as they should be; and you will have some idea of the curse inflicted on their off- spring by parents ignorant of the laws of life." The child not only has a physical nature, but he has also a moral and intellectual nature. For guid- ance in the moral and intellectual training of children THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 141 there is almost nothing in the average school cur- riculum whose study gives the requisite knowledge. Psychology and child study are the subjects ivhose pursuit gives the knowledge most valuable for guidance in these activities. But few schools have these subjects in their curricula at present, and probably will not for many years yet. "Be this as it may, however, here are the indis- putable facts: that the development of children in mind and body rigorously obeys certain laws; that unless these laws are in some degree conformed to hy parents, death is inevitable; that unless they are in a great degree conformed to, there must result serious physical and mental defects; and that only -when they are completely conformed to, can a per- fect maturity be reached." Man's Duties as a Citizen. — When one asks him- self what subjects there are in the school curriculum the pursuit of which furnishes guidance in one's duties as a citizen, his mind turns to history, for it has been asserted over and over again that the study of history makes good citizens. But when one stops to think whether history, as usually taught, does especially make good citizens, it does not seem very clear. It is safe to say that if history were properly taught, it would give a stock of knowledge valuable for guidance in citizenship. But in order that history may give this guidance it must not be taught merely 142 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. as a record of events; neither must it be taught as isolated events^ nor must all the time of teaching be spent on the state as an institution of society. To accomplish this desired result history must be studied as the struggle of the race in its effort for higher life. This struggle must be seen to have been one in all the institutions of society — the family, the school, the church, industrial life, and the state. It must be seen, too, that in human action there is a seed-time, a period of growth, and a fruitage. But as history is often taught it certainly is worth little for guidance in citizenship. Literature, if well taught, is valuable for guidance in this line of activities. The best interpretation of both history and liter- ature requires a knowledge of psychology. This is evident from the following: If one knew absolutely nothing about the human mind, he could not interpret history or literature at all. And certainly one who has an organized, systematic knowledge of psychology will interpret better than one who has only a frag- mentary, unorganized knowledge of it. ** Without an acquaintance with the general truths of biology and psychology, rational interpretation of social phenomena is impossible." "All social phe- nomena are phenomena of life — are ultimately de- pendent upon the laws of life — and can be understood only when the laws of life are understood. " THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 143: Sociology is the best subject in the school cur- riculum to furnish knowledge valuable for guidance in the duties of citizenship, and an understanding of sociology is absolutely dependent upon a knowledge of psychology. Thus, we see again that for knowledge to furnish guidance in this fourth division of human activities, we are largely dependent upon science. Spending Leisure Time. — A life with no leisure time is not most to be desired, for it is almost sure to become one of drudgery. All should have some leisure time and should have proper habits of spend- ing it. This time should be spent in such a way that it will furnish recreation and amusement, and at the same time be not degrading, but uplifting in its ef- fects. If one must spend his leisure time in such a way as to degrade himself, he would be benefitted by not having any to spend. This time could be spent in the enjoyment of Nature; in the enjoyment of literature; in the enjoy- ment of fine arts — architecture, sculpture, music, painting, and poetry — and in the companionship of one's friends, and so spent would be elevating, and ennobling. Those subjects which will put one in the right attitude of mind for the enjoyment of nature are those subjects which treat of nature. That is to say, they are the natural sciences — botany, zoology, geology, astronomy, chemistry, and physics. 144 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. That subject which gives knowledge valuable for -guidance in enjoying literature is directly the school subject, literature. And to this should be added psychology, which aids largely in the interpretation of literature. Music, now in many school courses is the subject Ti^rhich gives ability to enjoy music. In the average school curriculum there is nothing T^hich directly prepares one to enjoy architecture, sculpture, and painting. For the enjoyment of poetry, literature, reading, and psychology prepare one. Greek and Latin. — Prom a systematic study of the school curriculum one wonders why so much time is still spent on Greek and Latin in our schools. It <5annot be because they give knowledge valuable to vany large extent for guidance in living. In fact, they have small claim to a place in the school curriculum because of the valuable knowledge their pursuit fur- nishes. Their claim to a place in the curriculum rests upon the idea that they are good disciplinary studies. It has been shown that those subjects which furnish the most valuable knowledge also furnish the best discipline. Therefore, Greek and Latin are •over-rated as disciplinary subjects, too. It has also been seen that it never pays best to study any sub- ject merely for discipline when there are so many subjects the mastery of which furnishes the best discipline and valuable knowledge, too. THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 145 The Most Valuable Knowledge. — A systematic study of the school curriculum points indubitably to the fact that the most valuable group of subjects in the school curriculum is the science group; the most valuable from both the valuable knowledge stand- point, and the disciplinary standpoint. Science has liberated humanity from the bondage of superstition to a large extent. Science has tun- neled mountains, bridged rivers, and spanned continents. Science has harnessed waterfalls to do man's bidding. Science has tamed the lightning to minister to man's wants. Science has prevented plagues, stamped out zymotic diseases, and made it possible for man to inhabit almost every part of the earth. In short, science has been the vitalizing force which has done more to ameliorate the condition of mankind than all other influences combined. Science has enfranchised the human race physically, intel- lectually, aesthetically, socially, morally, and re- ligiously. Child Study and the Curriculum, — We will not lose sight of the fact that we started out to see whether our school curriculum is a rational one or not. And in the pursuit of the solution of this problem it has been found out that much time is wasted in school in the pursuit of subjects not the most valuable. There is also another phase of this subject which has an important bearing upon the rationality of the school curriculum. The question is, Are the subjects 146 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. m the school course taught at the time in the child's life when they are best adapted to his stage of de- velopment? A curriculum can not truthfully be said to be rational, if the various subjects are not taught at the period in the life of the learner when they may best be taught. For instance, no one would say a school curriculum which provides the study of algebra, of psychology, or of logic for the child of six is rational. Much systematic, painstaking, and exact study has recently been given to children in the search for the solution of this problem along with many others. The consensus of opinion on this question is pretty accurately stated in the following quotation: Changes in the Curriculum Suggested by Child Study.— ''Ouv increasing knowledge of the child's mind, his muscular and nervous system, and his special senses points indubitably to the conclusion that reading and writing are subjects which do not belong to the early years of school life, but to a later period, and that other subjects now studied later are better adapted to this early stage of development. What is thus indicated of reading and writing may be afarmed also of drawing and arithmetic. " The physiological and psychological reasons for the above statement can not be discussed here. Suf- fice it to say that the study of these things early hi school life produces nervous diseases, and arrested development; also, diseases of the sense organs. THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. 147 particularly of the eyes. There is, too, thus a great loss of time and energy, and bad mental habits are formed. Child study undoubtedly points to the fact that nature study ^ oral history, oral literature, and the free activity of the larger movements of the body, as in manual training, should constitute the school cur- riculum for about the first four years of the child's school life, and that reading, writing, spelling, draw- ing, and arithmetic should come later. So the answer derived from our study of the school curriculum is, that we certainly have not yet a wholly rational school curriculum. CHAPTER VII. THE TEACHER. Importance of the Teacher. — From the standpoint of the purpose of the school the learner is the most important element of the school. But from another point of view the teacher seems to be the most im- portant element of the school. It is true that the school exists for the learner, and without him there would be no need for the teacher, school house, cur- riculum, or school officers. The development in the child's life is the end to be attained, and all parts and processes of school work are means to this end. The end is always more important than the means in aU rational processes. Thus the teacher stands in re- lation to the development in the life of the learner as means to end. When the teacher is considered as the element in the school upon which its successful operation most depends, he seems the most important element in the school. There is much truth in the statement, ''As the teacher is, so will be the school. " He is the life-giving element in the school. If the teacher is properly- qualified, loves his work, and has a sympathetic in- THE TEACHER. 149 sight into the hves of his pupils, hardly any thing can make his school a failure. Duties of the Teacher.— The duties of the teacher are, indeed, many. He must poke the fire, sweep the floor, keep proper ventilation, oversee the care of school grounds, and vigilantly watch school property; tie up cut fingers, doctor bruised heads and limbs, soothe the sorrows of some, and rejoice in the joy of others; encourage the brave, generous, and true, and frown upon the cowardly, selfish, and deceitful. He must assign lessons, hear recitations, correct the wayward, and encourage the good of all kinds. From such an inventory of the teacher's duties it seems at first sight that nothing can be got but con- fusion. A little thought, however, will show that these duties may readily be divided into two classes: 1. Governing. 2. Teaching. Governing. — Governing is the work of the teacher in keeping the organization running ivith the least possible friction. A common error made by the teacher in school government is in thinking that he is a legislator as well as an executive. He thinks this and so acts as to lead his students to think it. No worse mistake than this can be made in school government. In- stead of the teacher's thinking that he is a legislator and that the laws of the school originate in him, he should understand that the laws of the school are in- herent in the organization itself. The pupils should be led by the conduct of the teacher to appreciate this fact, too, in so far as they are able to do so. 150 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. The teacher is governor in that it is his duty to call attention to the laws of the school, explain them, and execute them. Teaching. — Teaching is the luorTc of the teacher in leading the learner into those experiences which con- stantly make him a little more loise and virtuous. From this study of teaching it is easy to deduce the following definition of a teacher: A teacher is one who stimulates the learner to ex- periences which he would not have without that one^s influence. The teacher's duties in teaching are both positive and negative. Positive Duties. — Every experience the learner has affects him permanently to some degree. Some organize him toward a higher destiny and some, toward a lower. While the child is naturally born with capacities for becoming good, he is also born with capacities for becoming bad. ''The child inherits not only the good proclivities and propensities of his long line of ancestors, but he inherits also bad feelings and emotions. His heart is not altogether a good heart; it overflows not only in goodness but also at times more or less frequent, in selfishness, rancor, bitterness, cowardliness; in short in excesses and defects of various kinds. " From the positive side the teacher is to guide the child in the development of all that is good in his nature, and in the acquisition of knowledge which THE TEACHER. 151 will furnish guidance in right living. Thus the teacher's positive duties are to arouse the experiences in the life of the child which constantly lift him to a higher plane of living. Such experiences are along six lines: physical, intellectual, aesthetic, social, moral, and religious. And this is what it means to teach considered from the positive side. Thus, teacJmig is arousing those experiences — physical^ intelleGtual^ (Es- thetic, social, moral, and religious — in the life of the learner to the end that he may continuously grow into a higher life. Negative Duties. — The teacher's negative duties in teaching consist in eliminating the evil tendencies from the child's nature. The teacher is not to lose sight of the fact that the tendencies, propensities, and proclivities for wrong doing born in the child, inherited from his long line of ancestors must be eliminated. Some teachers make a mistake by thinking the child is naturally good. The child is not moral, neither is he immoral, but he is unmoral; but he may easily develop into an immoral individual, if surrounded by an immoral environment. Whatever immoral tend- encies he has are to be suppressed. But these characteristics can not .be effectively suppressed in the life of the child by simply attempting to root them out without supplying their places with some- thing. That is to say, education can not be alone negative nor even largely negative. The only safe 152 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. ^ plan is to eliminate the bad by building up the good in its place. No teacher or parent will succeed well in educating his children, who always has his eye fixed on the things which the children ought not to do. He should supply the good to take the place of the bad. In teaching, as in algebra, a good way to get rid of the undesirable element is to eliminate it by substitution. Characteristics of the Teacher. — In studying the characteristics of a teacher one is impressed, at the start, with the fact that there are some qualities which the teacher must have, if he teaches success- fully at all, and that there are other desirable qualities which not all can possess. Of the first class scholar- ship is an example, and of the second class good health and fine native ability are examples. The first class of characteristics may be called necessary character- istics; the second may be called supplementary char- acteristics. Without the first set the teacher must be a failure. The second set, while not absolutely neces- sary to the success of a teacher, are desirable and facilitate the ease with which success is attained. Necessary Characteristics. — As above stated, these are absolutely necessary to any marked degree of success on the part of the teacher, and are as follows: 1. Strong moral character. 2. Scholarship. 3. Professional preparation. 4. Energetic, student's habits. 5. The habit of daily preparation. 6. Love THE TEACHER. 155 of occupation. 7. Sympathy with children. We will study these somewhat in detail. Strong Moral Character. — ''The teacher should be an example, in person and conduct, of what he re- quires of his pupils." This is just as true to-day as when said by Comenius two hundred and fifty years ago. Since the purpose of the school and the aim of education is to make wise and virtuous men and women^ no influence which does not contribute to that end should ever be brought to bear upon the child. And since we are better understanding the power of sug- gestion, we are beginning to realize what a powerful influence on the life of the children the example of the teacher has. Slovenly habits of thought; slang, impure English, profanity, by- words; smoking, chew- ing tobacco; dishonesty, injustice, and selfishness all impress the life of the child and tend to reproduce themselves in him. No teacher who uses tobacco — smokes or chews — who is careless of his English, or who in any way shows himself dishonest or cowardly can be as good a man as he would be without those traits, and since anything which detracts from man- hood detracts from the teacher, it is equally true that he can not be as good a teacher as he would be with- out those traits. But while all can agree on the desirability of strong moral character for the teacher, to talk of it in the abstract without knowing very definitely what it means is not sufficiently helpful. An analysis will 154 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. show that, at the least, the following elements enter into moral character: 1. Knowledge of right and wrong. 2. Truthfulness. 3. Honesty. 4. Justness. 5. Habits of activity. 6. Self-control. Knowledge of Right and Wrong. — In order for one to have strong moral character, he must have the ability to think out the right and wrong in human activity. A man's motive may be good and the ac- tivity prompted by that motive be very bad. To say iihat a man may have strong moral character and be at the same time ignorant concerning the common laws of life and daily human actions is to place a premium on ignorance. An ignoramus can not be a man of strong moral character. To hold that an act is good provided it is done T^T^ithgood intentions, notwithstanding much human misery and unhappiness result from it is certainly a doctrine very pernicious and baneful in its results. Truthfulness. — It seems so evident that truthful- ness is an element of morality that no study is needed to prove it. There is one aspect of this question which enters largely into the work of the teacher. Teachers have feared to say ''I don't know," lest pupils would lose confidence in their ability. It does not necessarily follow that, if the teacher honestly acknowledges that he does not know, when such is the case, the pupils will lose confidence in his ability. If it were so, it would still be a question whether it is not preferable for students to lose confidence in one's THE TEACHER. 155 ability than to lose confidence in one's truthfulness. But students are, as a rule, reasonable. They do not expect that the teacher will never make a mistake, nor that he will know the correct answer to every question that arises. They further know that they have no right to expect so much, but they also know that they have a right to expect the teacher to be perfectly truthful. Honesty. — Honesty and truthfulness seem much the same thing, as elements of character. They how- ever emphasize different aspects of moral character. Truthfulness refers to the representation of things as they are, and so refers to one's representing things thus. Honesty refers to uprightness in the actions of one person to another. In honesty ques- tions of advantage and disadvantage are involved. There are many ways in which a teacher's honesty is involved in school work. The student's instinct for truth and honesty will assert itself to the extent that he will appreciate these qualities in the teacher. And pupils are quick to detect these characteristics as well as their opposites. It is a great misfortune for students to be under 1)he influence of a teacher who is untruthful and dis- honest. Their opportunities for receiving good from such a teacher are greatly lessened. Even when the teacher endeavors honestly to benefit his students, his influence wiU lack force and effectiveness. Students will not hear what he says when they know "what he is. 156 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. "How can I hear what you say, when what you are is thundering in my ear." "The teacher can not be a signboard. He must go the way he points. " Justness. — In school work, justness does not mean that all students must be treated alike. That all students must be treated alike is a traditional maxim of school which has been pernicious and evil in its effects. This maxim usually refers to correc- tions and rewards. Scarcely any one would think that in teaching all are to be taught in the same way, but in the matter of corrections and rewards the idea prevails to a greater or less extent that all students are to be treated in the same way. In the matter of being just in rewards and corrections the individual differences of children must be taken into considera- tion as well as in the teaching act. No two children respond to stimulus just in the same way nor in the same degree. It requires some firmness on the part of the teacher to be just. The teacher may err in two ways in matters of justness: 1. He may err because of kindness. 2. He may err from a hypercritical spirit. Too often the teacher because of kindness fails to have the student see just what his paper or recitation is worth. A paper graded on the scale of a hundred is marked seventy-five per cent, when justice would show it to be worth no more than thirty or forty per THE TEACHER. 157 cent. A recitation worth little or nothing is smoothed over and patched up by the teacher till the pupil is deceived into believing that he has really done some- thiug creditable. Justice may at times seem severe, but its very severity is educative in a high degree. Justice after a period of growth always brings a fruitage much to be desired. The teacher's profession is in need of teachers with courage to give children credit for just what they merit, no more and no less. Habits of Activity. — No one can be a sluggard and he a moral man. Morality means activity. There are people who think that if one does no active harm he is entitled to be called good. That is to say, some hold that activity is not a necessary element of good- ness in a man. A little study, however, shows the fallacy of this view. If one asks himself the question, "What is a good lead pencil?'* or "What is a good knife?" and stops to think out the answer, he will find that he will reach the conclusion that the lead pencil or knife is good which does its work well. That is, goodness refers to the ability or adaptability of a thing to do its work. And this is the meaning of goodness as generally understood concerning all things except man. That men are an exception to this general truth is not reasonable. Also, if a man who does neither active good nor bad and so does nothing is good, the question, ''What is he good for?" suggests at once the answer, ''good- for-nothing." 158 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. Under normal circumstances, a strong moral character means a life of intense activity. The teacher's profession has no need of teachers who find nothing to do after 4:00 P. M. and before 8:30 A. M., and least of all have our children need for such teachers. Self-control. — It seems unnecessary to emphasize the fact that self-control is an element of morality. A brief study of the lines of self-control is, however, of some help. For our purpose here, self-control may be divided Into the following aspects: 1. Control of the appetites. 2. Control of one's actions. 3. Control of one's language. No person who lets his appetites go without restraint can be a moral person. ''No heart is so pure, no soul is so noble, that physical appetite long unrestrained does not corrupt. Every mother has it In her power to form the tastes and appetites of her children. They are always formed^ but the process of re-forming is frequently a heart-breaking failure.'* The teacher may have an influence in this forming of tastes and appetites, but not with much effect until he has correctly formed his own. No teacher succeeds well who has not learned to control his actions in all aspects of school work. Many a teacher has lost his opportunities for doing good in a school by lack of ability to act calmly and THE TEACHER. 159 reasonably under trying circumstances. A success- ful teacher must guard his actions not only under trying circumstances, but all the time, even under the most usual circumstances. Controlling one's language is certainly an element of moral character under any consideration, but the control of the teacher's language is an element of great importance in successful teaching. A word of encouragement here, a kind word there; a word of approval for this effort, a word of disapproval for lack of effort; a mild, pleasing tone at all times; such,, other things equal, are among the important elements that go to make the ideal teacher. Sarcasm, irony, blustering, boisterous tones keyed to a high pitch are among the most disorganizing attributes a teacher can possess. Scholarship. — That a teacher must possess schol- arship to teach at all is unquestioned. No one can- teach what he does not know, and it is equally true that no one can teach well what he does not know well. Nothing gives more confidence to the teacher^ and nothing is more inspiring to the pupils than to know that the teacher is master of his subject. A school subject is a group of factSy these facts hav- ing a relation peculiar to that subject alone. The teacher who is master of his subject not only sees these facts, but he sees the relation of these facts to each other and to the subject as a whole. With such a knowledge- of his subject the teacher sees the end from the be- 160 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. ginning; he is able to distinguish the important from the unimportant, and to organize his work. A lack of scholarship makes the teacher a slave to the text- iDOok, instead of being, as he should be, a source of self -directive energy in the subject. It is a very deplorable set of conditions which compels teachers to teach subjects about which they know barely enough to make a grade for license. First class teaching can never be done under such circumstances. Professional Preparation. — Professional prepara- tion from the teacher's point of view means a mastery to a greater or less extent of those subjects which ivill furnish peculiar guidance to the teacher in his actual work in the schoolroom. Everyone who enters the profession of medicine, law, or the ministry rec- ognizes the need of study which will give guidance in his special work. That is to say, men of those pro- iessions recognize the need of special preparation for professional work. This is not less true in the teacher's work than in the other professions. A brief study shows that the teacher's professional prepa- ration consists in general of the following: 1. A systematic knowledge of the laws of life, b>oth physical and mental. 2. A knowledge of the purpose of education. 3. A knowledge of current, approved methods. 4. Practice in the art of teaching. A short study of each of these is beneficial. THE TEACHER. 161 A Knowledge of the Laius of Life. — The laws of life are those truths of the body and the mind which all physical and mental growth obeys during life. They are of two general classes: physical and mental. The teacher learns physical laws in the study of physi- ology and hygiene; and the mental laws are to be learned in the study of psychology. The question before us for study is, Must the most successful teacher have a scientifiG knowledge of psychol- ogy ^ physiology f and hygiene? We can study this question in the two following ways: 1. We can depend upon our own ability to think it out correctly. 2. We can study what our foremost educational thinkers have thought about it. What Our Own Study Shoivs. — If the teacher knew absolutely nothing of the laws of life, he could not teach school a day, an hour, or even a minute. He could not tell whether beef or arsenic would be food; whether a child would be comfortable in an atmos- phere at the freezing point or at the boiling point; whether he would be more comfortable sitting down, running, or standing on his head; nor could he decide on any hygienic or physiological question whatever concerning the child's welfare. Neither could he tell how, when, or why to teach any point of knowledge. He would not know whether to begin the study of algebra, logic, or reading with the child of six or with the child of sixteen. Without some 162 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. knowledge of the laws of life, the teacher could not (1) provide a suitable course of study; (2) arrange his school into classes; (3) assign lessons suitable to his classes; (4) interpret his pupils' conduct; (5) know whether his pupils grasp the meaning of the lesson. In short, he could not teach at all. Therefore, to teach school at all a teacher must know something of physiology^ hygiene^ and psychology. Everyone of course knows something of these sub- jects, but the knowledge of most is what is called ordinary knoivledgCy and not scientijic Tcnoivledge. An examination of ordinary knowledge shows it to be possessed of the following qualities: it is incompletey fragmentary, unorganized, contains many partial truths, has error intermingled ivith the truth, and is not usable to as high degree as it should be. Scientific knowledge is found to be possessed of the following qualities: it is more complete, more con- nected, better organized, contains more whole truths, has the error eliminated to a large degree, and is usable to a large extent. Now, the question is. Which will help the teacher more in teaching, the ordinary knowledge or the scientific knowledge of physiology, hygiene, and psychology? Everyone knows something of science, the knowl- edge having been picked up in fragments from ex- perience, but it is not this knowledge which has most caused the progress of the world. The knowledge THE TEACHER. 163 "which has caused civilization to move forward with such strides in the present century has been that which was scientific. Thus the question we started out to study re- duces itself to the following: First, a teacher must have some knowledge of physiology, hygiene, and psychology to teach at all. Secondly, the teacher through everyday experience may acquire an ordi- nary knowledge of these subjects. Thirdly, the teacher may acquire through study a scientific knowledge of these subjects. Fourthly, scientific knowledge is the most valuable for guidance. Fifthly, the teacher should have the scientific knowledge of physiology, hygiene, and psychology. Sixthly, the most successful teacher must be an earnest student of physiology^ hygiene, and psychology. Thoughts of Teachers. — There are two classes of teachers who oppose the study of psychology as a part of the teacher's professional preparation. Those of the first class know something of psychology only as an abstract science, not as an applied science. This class sees nothing in psychology but discipline, because to them there is no such a thing as educa- tional psychology. There are but few of this class, the most of them having belonged to an older school. Those of the second class, a very large class, know little or no scientific psychology, and so oppose it, because to acknowledge the need for it is to ac- 164 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. knowledge a criticism on themselves. With the second class the wish has been father to the thought. They oppose it perfectly consistently. If one knows no psychology, his knowledge of psychology certainly will not help him any in teaching. The rapid strides with which pedagogical work has been coming into schools of every kind is evidence of what is being thought on this subject. Every normal school, private and public, every college and university now has its pedagogical department. And this state of things is very recent. Now, psychology is the basis upon which the whole superstructure of pedagogy stands. Teachers' examinations almost everywhere now demand a knowledge of professional subjects, too. Thoughts of the Thinkers. — William T. Harris, United States Commissioner of Education, and an eminent thinker and educator says: "If the teacher knows nothing of psychology as a science, he must copy in detail the methods of others, and rely on his general knowledge of human nature derived from experience. Like all uneducated workmen, he may succeed after a sort by following tradition unaided by science, but he will not develop beyond a narrow degree of perfection in details. He will have no in- sight into the general relations of his work. He can not safely deviate from routine, nor venture to crit- icise his own work or the work of others. If he has learned good models, he may pass for a good teacher; THE TEACHER. 165 if he has learned bad ones, he is unable to perceive their defects. Possessing no scientific knowledge of the mind he can not lift himself above the details of his art to the principles which govern them, and become himself an original source of directive energy. Some knowledge of the mind every successful teacher must have, although in so many cases it is unsystem- atic, and consequently unscientific." Herbert Spencer, the philosopher, psychologist, and educator, says: ^' Grant that the phenomena of intelligence conform to laws; grant that the evolution of intelligence in a child also conforms to laws; and it follows inevitably that education can be rightly guided only by a knowledge of these laws. To suppose that you can properly regulate this process of forming and accumulating ideas, without understanding the nature of the process, is absurd. How widely, then, must teaching as it is, differ from teaching as it should be; when hardly any parents, and but few teachers, know anything about psychology." William James, an eminent psychologist, says: "It (a knowledge of psychology) certainly narrows the path for experiments and trials. We know in advance, if we are psychologists, that certain methods will be wrong, so our psychology saves from mis- takes. It makes us, moreover, more clear as to what we are about. We gain confidence in respect to any method which we are using as soon as we believe that it has theory as well as practice at its back. Most of 166 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. all it fructifies our independence, and it reanimates our interest." Without multiplying quotations, let it be sufficient to say there is scarcely an educator of note or good reputation among civilized peoples who does not speak in the same general way on this subject. A knoivledge of psycJiology is absolutely no guaran- tee of a good teacher^ hut it is just as true that no one can be more than a successful imitator as a teacher without a knowledge of psychology. To be an artist in one's work requires a mastery of the principles underlying that work. Purpose of Education. — The purpose of education has been studied before, but it remains to study why the teacher should have as nearly correct views as possible of the purpose of education. And since the purpose of education and the purpose of life are the same, the question to be studied is the importance of having the correct view of the purpose of life. One may possibly wear his religion on Sundays, and put it off on week days. But his view of the object to be accomplished by education will show it- self in all he does. Every act in the schoolroom will be affected by it. If he has wrong ideas of the pur- pose of education, every assignment will be tinged by it; every recitation will be colored thereby; and every correction or direction will be affected by these false ideas. If he has right ideas of life and education, they will manifest themselves in all his school work. THE TEACHER. 167 If he has no definite ideas of the purpose of education and life, his work will be purposeless, scattering, disorganized, and fragmentary. A clear, fervent purpose will draw the teacher's work toward its ac- complishment as surely as the magnet attracts the particles of steel. Knowledge of Methods. — The teacher should know current approved methods of teaching the various school subjects. The notion that students can grad- uate from the primary school or the high school and go into the schools and teach well without having studied approved methods is entirely wrong, and baneful, and pernicious in its influences. The ap- pallingly bad work done by such teachers all over the country is evidence of this truth. It is still held by many that if the teacher knows his subject well this is a guarantee that he will teach it well. This, however, is not at all necessarily true. Nothing is commoner in school work than teachers who know their subjects well, but who teach poorly. ''The professional training of teachers is not generally high. Many people still entertain the idea that to know a subject is a guarantee of the ability to teach it. Nor is it easy to demonstrate the fallacy of this notion to those who are ignorant of the laws that govern the workings of the human mind." The teacher who knows the method of teaching any subject knows (1) the means to he used; (2) howcm^- rectly to use them; (3) the natural processes of tJie learner's mind in learning that subject. 168 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. To any one who will think it is plain that to know this is of equal importance with knowing well the subject. This point will receive full study in chapter IX. Practice in the Art of Teaching. — One becomes skillful in doing anything by practice. Thus one becomes skillful in writing by practice in writing; skillful in riding a bicycle by riding; skillful in skating by skating; skillful in ball-playing by playing ball. This is a principle that holds true in the acquirement of any art. And since teaching is an art, the principle applies to it. So a teacher to become skillful must have practice in the art of teaching. This practice may be obtained in two ways: 1. A student may obtain it by teaching as a student- teacher under the direction of a skillful train- ing-teacher in a training school. 2. A teacher may obtain it by teaching in his own school without having had any practice before, and thus acquire the skill by experience without the direction of a training- teacher. It is evident that learning to teach in the latter way is pretty hard on the pupils upon which the teacher practices. It is too much a matter of experi- ment, and is very much like a physician's learning to practice medicine by experimenting upon his pa- tients. But everywhere almost the children in our schools are victims of such experimenting. THE TEACHER. 169 It is truly a deplorable set of conditions which compels persons to teach who have merely enough education in the subjects to secure licenses, and it ia certainly not a less deplorable set of conditions which compels teachers to experiment thus with the inno- cent lives of our children. Energetic Student Habits. — ^The living teacher is a. constant worker. He ever keeps before him a high degree of excellence in all lines of work toward which he constantly strives. A teacher never reaches a place in his school work where he can safely rest on the oars and drift. There is absolutely no way ta have a thorough, fresh knowledge of the subjects taught; to keep in mind the best educational methods and ideals; to maintain a healthful interest in one's profession but by constant industrious student habits. Everything that lives progresses, and nothing makes progress more rapidly than the science and art of education. One as a teacher simply can not rely upon his past preparation to guide him safely and success- fully through in his teaching. He must keep up with educational progress or he will be an "old fogy " and a "fossil" sooner than he is aware. The educational world demands thoughtful, progressive teachers. "To reach the port of heaven, we must sail some- times with the wind and sometimes against it, — but we must sail, and not drift nor lie at anchor. " Daihj Preparation. — No teacher can succeed well without the habit of preparing his lessons for his. 170 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. daily recitations, and for this reason the habit of daily preparation is regarded a necessary character- istic of the teacher. A teacher never gets to a point "where he knows a subject so well that he can do his best work without making special preparation for each lesson. This is true for several reasons. First, no lesson is ever taught at any two times under the same set of circumstances. Students to whom the lessons are to be taught will vary in capacity and other particulars. So each lesson must be prepared with the view of teaching it to the particular class one has, if the very best teaching is to be done. Secondly, a teacher who teaches without daily preparation shows staleness in his work; his teaching lacking all the freshness, vigor, and interest born of seeing something new in the subject. This results irom the fact that going over the same thing again and again without seeing anything new of necessity grows monotonous and uninteresting. While on the other hand no one ever knows a subject so well but that he can see something new in it by his study in daily preparation. Thirdly, for most teachers it is the only means of mitigating the evils which usually result from a lack of sufficient knowledge of the subjects taught. The teacher who will succeed best is the one who *'gets out" his lessons daily. This he expects of his students, and this his students have a right to expect of him. THE TEACHER. 171 Love of Occupatio^i.—^Eyerj one knows with how much more zest work which one Hkes to do is done than work which one does not hke to do. Too many teachers make teaching a mere stepping-stone to some other kind of work, and so do not put their hearts into it and really prepare themselves for the work. Not being in love with teaching is largely the cause of this. No teacher who does not hke to teach school can show so much interest, enthusiasm, aggressiveness, and progressiveness in his work as he would if he loved it. Love for the work hghtens the labor; it puts the spirit of life into it. Otherwise teaching becomes the veriest drudgery, a thing to be endured only. Sympathy with Children. — By m^d^Xhy with chil- dren has been regarded by many great educators as the highest and most essential characteristic of the teacher. The abihty of the teacher to rejoice with his students in their joys and triumphs, to grieve with them in their grief, in short, to be in sympa- thetic touch with their lives in all phases is the characteristic above all others that enables the teacher to touch the lives of his children and uplift them. Such a teacher is one of heart power— the one who can love every chUd, the erring and wayward as well as the good. It is unfortunate for the children that circum- stances are such that teachers largely teach school at a period of hfe when they have the least sympathy 172 STUDIES 1]S PEDAGOGY. for children. From sixteen to thirty is the period in life in which young men and young women have the least sympathy for children. This is the period in which young men and young women are most inter- ested in themselves and in each other. Before sixteen, and after about thirty they have more sympathy with children. But between sixteen and thirty is the period in which a large majority of teachers do their teaching. Sympathy for child life is idealized in the follow* ing, said to have been found among the unpublished papers of Charles Dickens, the great educator and lover of children: They are idols of hearts and of households; They are angels of God in disguise; His sunshine still sleeps in their tresses; His glory still beams in their eyes. Those shouts of home and of heaven Have made me more manly and mild, And I now know how Jesus could liken The Kingdom of God to a child. My heart grows as tender as woman's, And the fountains of feeling will flow, When I think of the paths steep and stony Where the feet of these dear ones must go. O, the mountains of sin that o'er-hang them ! O, the tempests of fate blowing wild ! But I know there's nothing on earth more holy Than the innocent heart of a child. Desirable Characteristics^ Though Not Absolutely Necessary. — ^There are several characteristics which THE TEACHER 173 greatly facilitate a teacher's success, but which not all teachers can possess, and without which success in teaching may still be attained. A few of the most important of these will be briefly studied: 1. Good health. 2. Natural aptitude. 3. Personal magnet- ism. 4. Mastery of the circumstances. Good Health. — The relation between the mind and body is so close that whatever in any way affects the efficiency of bodily functions also affects the mind. Dispositions and temperaments are results of bodily conditions. To do one's best work of any kind requires a healthy, vigorous, vivacious condition of the nervous, digestive, circulatory, respiratory, and muscular systems. Aggressive, vigorous, efficient work is the accompaniment of good health. Ill health on the other hand induces weakness of effort, irritability of mind, despondent and depressed states of spirit, discouragement and dreariness fatal to all successful teaching and school government. Ill health makes all work drudgery, amusement a bore, and life a misery and a failure. The longer one lives the more fully he appreciates this fact Therefore, one of the highest duties towards his school is for the teacher to make all reasonable ex- ertion to keep his health uniformly excellent. Natural Aptitude. — No doubt there are persons who are to some extent natural teachers; that is, are naturally adapted to teaching, while others have no natural ability as a teacher. There are persons who 174 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. naturally show an aptitude in music, while others can never reach any marked degree of proficiency in music. The same is without doubt true of teachers. This natural aptitude is a very desirable character- istic, and one that must be possessed by every teacher to some extent, but it is one which not all, not even a majority of teachers, possess to a large extent. That most persons can become good teachers with proper preparation is an encouraging truth. However, it is just as true that there are some who when they at- tempt to teach have entirely missed their calling. There are some whose native ability for teaching is such that they will never succeed at this work. Such people, who may be most excellent men and women, may succeed well at some other line of work. Froebel and Pestalozzi succeeded well at nothing else but teaching. Personal Magnetism. — This is the characteristic of the teacher which draws people to him. It is the endowment of the teacher which makes friends for him both in school and out of school. It is not, as some suppose, altogether an endowment with which one is born. It may be attained to by painstaking care. Some of the elements which go to make it up are general friendliness, sympathy, courtesy, charity, frank- ness, and pleasant greeting. These elements may all or any of them be attained by careful cultivation. Mastery of Circumstances. — By a mastery of cir- cumstances is meant the ability of doing the proper THE TEACHER. 175 thing next under any set of circumstances. There are persons who seem never to know what to do next under any set of circumstances except the most usual, while again there are persons who seem always to know what to do in any set of circumstances. Now the teacher has much need of belonging to the latter class, for a school is a place famous for the uprising of unusual circumstances. A teacher must possess the ability to some extent to meet the occasion, other- wise he can hardly get along for a day. But perhaps not all can possess this characteristic to the extent desired. Illustration. — A student upon an occasion of fail- ure in recitation in a class, insisted he had no right to believe what he could not see with his eyes. Vari- ous illustrations were given by the teacher to show that the position taken by the student was not only untenable but unreasonable. The student would not be convinced of his error. The teacher mildly and pleasantly asked the student if he believed he had a brain. A smile went around the class and the student took his seat without a word. CHAPTER VIII. THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. Importance of. — There is no subject that enlists the attention of the teacher of more far-reaching im- portance tlian this one of school government. Upon the successful solution of the question, How best manage a school? depends the efficiency of all the school processes. The teacher who fails in school government fails in all, because all other aspects of school work bear an organic relation to school man- agement and their efficiency depends upon it. To the beginning teacher it is the most vital school question. It is the rock upon which more teachers in their careers have been shipwrecked than upon any other. It has caused more sleepless nights, more shattered nervous systems, more hot, scalding tears than any other aspect of school work. Kinds of School Government. — There are to be iound in school two kinds of school government: gov- ernment by force, or fear, and government by direc- tion rather than by suppression. The following names are respectively appropriate: 1. Police gov- ernment. 2. Rational government. Police government is by physical force, or by fear on the part of the pupils. Such government is always THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 177 accompanied by a great deal of friction and bad feel- ing. It does little or nothing toward giving the pupil habits of right self-control and self-direction, the end of all school government. Rational government aims to lead the pupils to do right because they love the right. It is to be accomplished by reasonable means of firmness, kind- ness, and justice. It accomplishes much toward making pupils self-governing, toward giving them habits of right self-control and right self-direction. The School an Organization. — In the study of the nature of the school in a previous chapter, it was seen that the school is an organization, and that the ideas which are to be found in an organization, according to the best use of the term, are: 1. It is a complex whole. 2. This whole is made up of individual parts. 3. These parts have a harmonious working re- lation. 4. These parts work for one common end. 5. The whole is self-acting and self-adjusting. The school is made up of pupil, teacher, cur- riculum, school officers, etc., aU constituting a com- plex whole, the individual parts being patrons, school officers, children, teacher, etc. These all work to- gether in such a way as not to produce friction, and so as to economize energy as far as possible. This is what is meant by a harmonious working relation. The education of the learner is, the common end for 178 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. which all these parts work. The school as a whole acts — originates its program, classes, recitations, and sets up ideals and strives to attain them ; it also, when it gets out of order, proceeds to adjust its own diffi- culties. In this way it is self-acting and self-ad- justing. The Fundamental Law. — When the school is doing the work of educating the pupils the most efficiently, it is found to be when there is the most unity in it. And when it is doing its work the most poorly, it is found to be when there is the greatest lack of unity. Then the law underlying all the complex activities of the school to which they conform in order to contrib- ute to the highest success of the school, is the law of unity. By unity is meant that any act of any element of the school furthers any other act of the same element or any act of a different element toiuard the accomplishment of the purpose of the school. It is evident that unity is the thing which will contribute to the success of the school always. And it is equally evident that if one element of the school so acts that his activity antagonizes the acts of any other element, or other acts of his own that it works against the success of the school — it breaks the law of unity. From the study so far the hint is that the problem invoU^ed in school management is the maintenance of the law of unity. THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 179 Source of the Law. — The laws of any organization are inherent in the organization and are not externally imposed. The law that determines that the plumule, the growing point of the stem of the plant, grows toward sunlight and air, and the law that determines that the radix, the growing point of the root, grows from the sunlight and air are in the inherent nature of the plant. No externally imposed conditions can change the laws. The botanist can discover these and many other laws of plant life, but he can make no laws for the plant. No one can legislate for the plant. Legislatures and parliaments might pass a law that hereafter plants should grow, blossom, and produce fruit without moisture, sunshine, and heat, and all nations of the earth might ratify this law, but the plants would go on in their own seemingly stubborn way, and demand for their growth, heat, light, and moisture. The law of the school is as much a part of the nature of the school as the laws of plant life are a part of the nature of the plant. Rules. — The various aspects of the law of unity are rightly to be considered the rules of the school. Some writers have attempted to make a distinction between the law of the school and the rules of the school. It has been said that a rule of the school is an externally imposed regulation made by the teacher, director, trustee, or superintendent, and that a law of the school is some truth inherent in the nature of 180 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. the school according to which the various elements act. This is not a true distinction; and to attempt to make such a distinction is bad, because it is a source of mischief. The right meaning of a rule is, that it is a minor law. The various aspects of the law of unity are thus the rules of the school. The following is a formal statement for it: A rule of the school is some aspect of the laiu of unity. The correct ideas of the law and the rules of the school should be thoroughly fixed in the lives of pupils and teacher. Aspects of the Laio. — An analysis of the law of unity in the school reveals various lines of unity to be sought, the most prominent of which are the follow- ing: 1. Unity in the organization as a whole. 2. Unity between teacher and pupil. 3. Unity between the pupil's real and ideal self. Before taking up the study of each of these in detail, it is worth while to notice that this is only a very general analysis. A minute analysis would re- veal almost an endless number of aspects of the law of unity. For instance, there must be unity between patrons and teacher; between patrons and children; among school officers; between the school officers and teacher; between the school officers and children, and among the children themselves. Each one of these unities might in turn be further analyzed. THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 181 Unity in the Organization as a Whole. — There is complete unity in the organization as a whole when every element of it is so acting that each act furthers the influence of any other act of any element toivard the accomplishment of the common end — the education of the learner. The thought of what unity in the school as a whole consists of is of the highest importance to every conscious element in the school. If this thought can be so firmly fixed in the minds of each person — teacher, learner, school officers, and patrons — con- nected with the school that it will become a part of his life, the government of the school will be largely accomplished. An appreciation of the meaning of the law of unity in the organization as a whole will reveal the fact that it is not the learner alone, as usually thought, who violates the rules of the school, but almost as often the teacher, the patrons, or the school hoard. Legislators themselves may break the rules of the school by making "school laws" that break the unity of the school, and militate against the integrity and efficiency of school work. It thus appears that there is a distinction between the law of the school and what often goes into the statutes as "school laws. " When a school board secures a teacher for any other reason than because of the ability of that teacher to do good teaching, its members break the law of the school. That teachers should be chosen 182 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. from any other consideration than their ability to minister to the lives of their pupils is a pernicious doctrine which should have the condemnation of all honest and sensible people in the strongest possible terms. Poverty, patronage, nepotism, machine pol- itics, church influences, and so on, of themselves should have absolutely no place in the considerations when a teacher is to be chosen. A school board will hire a teacher year after year wholly incompetent and unfit for a teacher, because she is poor and has an invalid mother; they will not hire competent and pro- ficient married ladies to teach because perchance a married lady who teaches will support her worthless husband. Or they will trade patronage, a teacher being hired because she trades at the store which is owned by a member of the board. Such school boards are the worst enemies of the schools and the children who are in them. There is no economy, no justice, nor common sense in thus injuring the lives of a room-full of children, thirty or forty, year after year, in order to furnish a place for a teacher who is incompetent. One gets heart- sick at the incompetency, dis- honesty, or imbecility of a school board which will take into consideration the many things brought to bear to secure places for incompetent teachers even at the disregard of the influence on the growing lives of the children. The doctrine that sets anything above the welfare of the pupils in the choice of teach- ers is wholly indefensible. THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 183 In this manner is the law of the school broken by school boards to their everlasting dishonor and dis- grace; and the conditions of our school system which permit this pernicious custom constitute the most serious defect of the American schools to-day, one whose influence is baneful alike to pupils and teachers. The Power of Sentiment. — By sentiment is meant a feeling for or against anything because of a knowl- edge concerning that thing. Sentiment is a powerful factor in controlling people's lives and actions. In fact life is almost wholly controlled by sentiment. A certain church community has a sentiment against an organ in church, and a pastor comes and lauds the advantages of the church organ. One can easily judge the standing of that pastor in that com- munity. The same sermon might be preached in another community with most satisfactory results. In a town now in mind almost everyone plays at cards, and any new-comer who refuses to play is regarded as unsociable and ridiculous. The best church people in this town do not object to cards, so to play at cards has no bad effect upon one's reputa- tion in this town. In another town now in mind, to play at cards is placed in the category of heinous crimes, so to play at cards here would ruin one's reputation and destroy his usefulness in this com- munity. What is the difference in the two places? The answer is a difference in sentiment. Since sentiment is thus so strong a factor in determining people's actions, it may be made use of 184 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. very advantageously in school government. If there is some line of conduct which breaks the law of unity in the school, the most potent, as well as the most rational, means of controlling it is to establish a sen- timent against it in the school. And if there is some line of conduct beneficial to the school, the surest way of introducing and maintaining it is to establish a sentiment in favor of it. The Main Line of School Government. — It will be found then that the main work of the teacher in school government is to establish a proper sentiment with respect to the following five points: 1. The law of the school is inherent in the school because of the pupil's part in it. 2. The pupils as much as the teacher help to make the rules of the school. 3. The teacher, pupils, school officers, or patrons may break a rule of the school. 4. The pupils as well as the teacher help to keep the rules of the school intact. 5. The ultimate object of the school is the high- est good of each pupil. If teachers can estabhsh a strong sentiment for that which is wanted and against that which is not wanted in school the government of the school will largely care for itself. "The main line of work running through the management of a school is that of developing in THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 185" the thought of the pupil the laws which are in the school because of his membership in it." Behavior, or Conduct. — Behavior in school is often thought of as applying merely to the student, but a. true view shows that conduct with reference to the school involves the actions of the teacher, pupil, pa- tron, or school officer. Conduct in school is one^s hear- ing toioard the unity in the school. Good conduct is that which maintains or tends to maintain the unity in school; bad conduct is that which breaks or tends to break the unity in school. That which is good behavior is right in school, and bad behavior is wrong^^ in school. Illustration. — Whispering as a rule is wrong in school, because it breaks the unity in several ways. First, it breaks the unity between the teacher and the pupil, because it is discourteous to the teacher ,-^ and when the pupil whispers he breaks the unity of thought between his own mind and the mind of the teacher. Secondly, it disturbs others in the class, is noisy, and disorderly. Every teacher should set the stamp of strong disapproval upon whispering in school by showing the students that they are much more gentlemanly and lady-like without it. Unity betiveen Teacher and Learner. — It is in the unity between the teacher and the learner that the life of the learner comes into vital touch with the life of the teacher. There is unity between the teacher and the learner when there is a mutual furtherance ia. their acts toward the education of the learner. 186 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. This unity has an important influence upon suc- cessful teaching. No teacher can do his best teaching to a student when he is aware that there is antagonism between that student and himself — when he does not like the student or when he knows the student does not like him. And no student can do his best work for a teacher when he does not like the teacher or w^hen he knows the teacher does not like him. From which it results that the teacher should make all reasonable efforts to maintain cordial relations be- tween himself and his students. These cordial re- lations should manifest themselves at all times both in the recitation and out, if this unity is to be main- tained. Unity between the Learner's Real and Ideal Self. — There is unity between the learner's real and ideal self when each act of his life lifts him from a lower to a higher plane of living; when through his action the I am becomes constantly what was the / ought just before the act. From this it appears that constant, perfect unity between the real and ideal self of the learner can never be more than approximated, for to attain to such unity constantly would be an ideal growth to- ward self-realization. To make the learner conscious that every act of his life leaves a permanent effect and influence on his life, and that every act which brings about unity be- tween his real and ideal self influences him for good, THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 187 and that every act which breaks this unity or tends to break it affects him for the worse, is to make him conscious of the disturbing struggle in Ufe. When the learner sees and fervently feels the nature of this struggle he is naturally unwilling to do those things which will degrade him, but aspires to a higher life constantly. Thus in maintaining the unity between the student's real and ideal self, the school is fixing the habit with him of right living under any circumstan- ces. And this — to give the learner the habit of self-con- trol and right self-direction — is the ultimate end of all school government Unifying Conditions. — Unity in school is not best attained directly, but is best attained indirectly by establishing unifying conditions. With the proper unifying conditions established unity follows as a natural result. Thus the establishing of unifying conditions is a means to unity as an end. Unifying conditions might be analyzed into many aspects, but time will permit the study of only the following important aspects : 1. Unifying conditions in the organization as a whole. 2. Unifying conditions between teacher and learner. 3. Unifying conditions between the learner's real and ideal self. 188 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. Unifying Conditions in the Organization as a Whole, — Unity in the organization as a whole means that all the elements of the school so act that each act fur- thers the influence of any other activity of any element toward the accomplishment of the common object — the education of the learner. Now, what is the condition which preeminently brings about this unity? The answer to this question is, the condition above all others for unity in the organization as a whole is the proper sentiment to- ward the nature of the school and its work; that is, the proper sentiment toward the following points as stated before: 1. The law of the school is inherent in the school because of the pupil's part in it. 2. The pupils as much as the teacher help to make the rules of the school. 3. The teacher, pupils, school officers, or patrons may break a rule of the school. 4. The pupils as well as the teacher help to keep the rules of the school intact. 5. The ultimate object of the school is the high- est good of each pupil. This condition estimates every act of every ele- ment of the school in terms of its ministry to the wel- fare of the pupils. It means the best is none too good for the pupil. The best teacher, the best school house, the best books, the best school board, the best THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 189 superintendent, and the best apparatus are due the pupils. And any school officer, teacher, or superintend- ent who purposely, or through neglect, does less than to strenuously exert himself to secure those con- ditions is not loyal to the charge entrusted to him. Conditions of Unity between Teacher and Pupils. — The most important condition of unity between teacher and pupils is the spirit of good will and cor- diality — the feeling on the part of the pupils that their teacher is earnestly trying to do them good, and the feeling on the part of the teacher that the students believe that he is earnestly trying to help them on toward a wise and virtuous life. This spirit in school is the most potent condition of unity between the teacher and his pupils. A second important condition of unity between the teacher and pupils is the school-room. It is the place where the outward form of unity in the school is maintained. It is the place where the students come together for the work of the school, and it may be made a positive influence for securing unity. "It must be more than a secure, quiet, and com- fortable meeting-place for teacher and pupil; it must have a positively elevating influence, bringing the pupil, by its active toning power, into the higher life and mood of unity with the teacher." The schoolroom should be a place of harmony, peace, and beauty; pleasing, attractive, and homehke. 190 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. It should have clean and beautiful floors and walls, with some harmony between the two. There should be some decoration in the form of some well chosen pictures, not many, though, some casts, and some vases and flowers; and whatever else good taste sug- gests to make it pleasant, pure, harmonious, and admirable. The general tone of such a schoolroom constantly tends to induce the attitude of mind favor- able to the unity of the pupil with his teacher. The Purpose of the Schoolroom. — The purpose of the schoolroom as a unifying condition may be ana- lyzed into the following three points: 1. To bring the learner into the presence of the teacher. 2. To make the teacher and learner comfortable. 3. To minimize diverting influences. Presence of Learner. — In the schoolroom the learner is brought into the presence of the teacher. It is necessary for the pupil and teacher to work in the same atmosphere. No first rate teaching can be done except in the presence of the learner. An at- tempt is sometimes made to teach by correspondence, but such teaching lacks the life, flexibility, and force that come from the personal contact of teacher and learner. In the presence of the student the teacher can adapt his teaching to the moods, attitudes of mind, and peculiarities of each individual. Thus only in the presence of the student can the teacher best lead him to think, experience the feeling, and will as he should. THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 191 Also in teaching it is necessary to have the pupils in easy communicable relations. The minds of pupils can not keep in touch with the mind of the teacher in the teaching act unless the pupils can without difficulty see and hear the teacher. If students must crane their necks to see the teacher's face and gestures, and strain to hear his words, it is safe to say unity will not last long under such con- ditions. Students will naturally make a few spas- modic efforts under such circumstances to maintain the unity between themselves and the teacher, but the tension being too great, they will soon settle down, the unity broken, to await the end of the recitation. Communicable relations demand that the school- room be not 'too long, nor too broad. Students can not hear the teacher well more than thirty feet, and can not see the teacher well from the sides if the width of the room is more than twenty-four feet. All school authorities are agreed on these dimensions for a schoolroom. So from the standpoint of school gov- ernment, as well as from the hygienic standpoint, no schoolroom should be larger than twenty-four by thirty-three feet. Comfoi^t of Teacher and Pupils. — Much of the noise and friction in school arises because the pupils are uncomfortable. No student should be expected to work quietly who is uncomfortable to any great ex- tent. While the schoolhouse is to provide for the comfort of pupils and teachers, many of them cer- 192 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. tainly fail in this to a remarkable degree. When students and the teacher are uncomfortable, the unity of teacher and pupils is broken in that their attention is drawn to their bodily discomfort. Thus no student or teacher can do his best work under conditions of bodily discomfort. There are at any rate four things connected with the schoolroom which will contribute to bodily com- fort: 1. Comfortable seats. 2. Proper temper- ature. 3. Proper ventilation. 4. Proper lighting. Not only from hygienic reasons, but from reasons of school government should the seats be of proper pattern, and well adapted to the age and size of pupils who use them. The demand for seats adapted to the individual students who use them will sooner or later bring adjustable seats into the schoolroom. The need of them has been felt in the past, but school officers have objected to them on the grounds that they are not substantially made and that they cost too much. Both these objections will in time be over- come. Every schoolroom should have a thermometer liung about four feet from the floor in some part of the room where the air would be at an average tem- perature with that in the room as a whole, and the mercury should be kept as nearly as possible at from 68° to 72°, Fahrenheit. If the temperature is below this, some one will be uncomfortable from cold; and if the temperature is above this, some one will be un- comfortable with heat. THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 193 Plenty of pure fresh air admitted to the school- room in such a way that no one, teacher or pupil, will be subjected to draughts is certainly essential to comfort, and since essential to comfort, it becomes a question of school management as well as a question of school hygiene. One point here needs to be re- Iterated and emphasized, and that is, that air may be unfit to breathe and at the same time be cold. That the temperature of a room is 68° or below is absolutely no guarantee that the air in that room is pure enough to breathe. This is a truth that many janitors never learn. Bad lighting likewise induces bodily discomfort and so breaks up the unity. Plenty of light for all parts of the room should be admitted to the school- room at all times, and the main sources should be from the pupil's back and left. In order that there may be plenty of light in all parts of the room the relation between floor space and window pane space should be 4 to 1; that is, there should be not less than one square foot of window pane to every four square feet of floor space. This relation should obtain when there are no obstructions to prevent the free passage of light. If buildings, trees, or anything of the kind obstruct the free passage of the light, there should be more than one square foot of window pane to four square feet of floor space. The seating, heating, ventilating, and lighting of schoolrooms have usually been studied from the 194 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. hygienic standpoint, but they also deserve study from the viewpoint of school management. Minimizing Diverting Influences. — Any influence which takes the pupil's attention away from his school work is a diverting influence, and whatever removes influences that take the pupil's attention, from his school work is a condition of unity. The schoolroom evidently shuts out many influences which would attract the pupil's attention, and thus divert him. Some schoolrooms are however so situated that all sorts of sights and sounds are continually attract- ing the attention of the pupils. The writer has taught in a schoolroom near a railroad upon which as many as four or five heavily loaded trains would pass during one recitation period. Just so many times was the unity of the recitation broken. Again, a schoolroom situated near a paved street will often have the unity between the teacher and pupils broken by the rat- tling of vehicles upon this street. These points are worth consideration in choosing a location for school buildings. It is upon the school premises and within the schoolroom in particular though that distracting in- fluences may be minimized. These influences are those which divert through: 1. Touch. 2. Sight. 3. Hearing. Touch. — The law against diverting influences through touch demands that all pencils, knives, un- necessary books, fruit, toys, pencil cases, etc., except THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 195 those in actual use, should be removed from desks. If such things are left on the desk they are a constant challenge to the student to touch them, and as such under any ordinary circumstances will be handled by the students. This law also demands single seats, and estimates especially their superiority over double seats. Sight. — It is imperative that all unnecessary sights be removed from the attention of the students. Hence the law against students passing from one part of the room to another; to the water bucket; to and from the stove; against any unusual arrangement of school furniture. Hearing. — The law against distracting influences through hearing demands quiet in the schoolroom. This is such an important point in school management that special study needs to be given to it. From a mistaken idea that to demand quiet in the schoolroom is to rob children of their freedom, some teachers not only permit but advocate an intolerable amount of noise in their schools. The error of this doctrine should be made as clear as possible to every teacher because of the mischief ensuing from it. Dr. Arnold Tompkins exposes weU its pedagog- ical unsoundness in the following: ''Most effective of all means of diverting the attention is noise. Si- lence must be the law of the schoolroom. The noise of whispering, studying, fixing fires, walking, loud talk of the teacher, etc., must be gotten rid of. It is 196 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. quite common for the teacher to make more noise than all the pupils together. A teacher should speak in subdued tones, and move about too quietly to attract notice. He should so address a class during recita- tion that the pupils studying are not compelled to listen. Pencils should be sharpened at recess; and slate frames covered, or slates abolished for note- books. I know it has been often urged that a noisy schoolroom is a sign of energy and activity, of in- dustry and hard work; that the working beehive must hum. This sounds very well till we reflect that it is physical energy and activity that makes the noise; there is no mental analogy. Rather it is the reverse; the greater the mental activity the greater the silence. The boy who thinks is not necessarily noisy, but necessarily silent. All professional students seek a silent retreat as the best condition for mental labor. This doctrine of a noisy school arises from two classes of teachers, — those who can not secure silence and seek an escape through the theory; and those who champion in good faith the plea for freedom on the part of the pupil, — or as it seems to some, a plea for license." Since the child has such a superabundance of energy which seeks to discharge itself in muscular activity, it is almost an impossibility for him to keep quiet long at a time. This truth together with the law of silence for the schoolroom demands short THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 197 school hours with frequent intermissions and rest periods in which an opportunity is given for muscular activity. Marches, drills, and other forms of physical exercise are a powerful means in maintaining silence in the schoolroom if interspersed between the periods of mental work. Conditions of Unity betiveen the Learner's Real and Ideal Self.— It may be reiterated that there is unity between the pupil's real and ideal self when each act he puts forth helps to fix in him habits of wisdom and virtue. If each act would do so, this would be ideal growth in self-realization. The highest aim of the school is to induce actions by the pupil that will constantly uplift him, and give him the ability to inhibit those which would degrade him, that the growth brought about by these activities may crystallize into character whose elements are wisdom and virtue. But this would be nothing more than unity between the learner's real and ideal self . The conditions of this unity are at any rate four: 1. Pure motives. 2. Right ideas of life. 3. Incen- tives. 4. Social influences. Pure Motives. — Pure motives mean one^s intentions to do good in his actions. The one who habitually intends to do good in his actions is much more likely to do the things which will constantly further him toward wisdom and virtue, than the one who frequently does things with bad intent. Of course one may make mistakes, but on 198 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. the whole pure motives prove a very potent condition in maintaining the unity between the learner's real and ideal self. That the teacher may lead the student to look into his own mind and make inquiries about his motives is a thought worthy of attention, too. In this way the teacher may help the pupils in establishing this very important condition of unity. Right Ideas of Life. — One's ideas of anything al- ways determine very largely what his actions are toward that thing. Therefore, the pupil must have right ideas of life, otherwise he can not attain to right living. If the pupil can be made to see and feel fer- vently that, when all things are considered, there is but one thing in general in life worth living for, namely, a high type of wise and virtuous manhood or womanhood, one very essential condition of unity be- tween his real and ideal self exists. What an opportunity here for the teacher who is himself what his students should become, to help students to start right in life. The teacher must have thought out what life's success consists in, it is true, before he can inspire students to hunger and thirst after righteousness. Right ideas of life and conduct are certainly a Yery important condition of unity between the learn- er 's real and ideal self. Incentives. — Incentives are stimuli to urge to ac- tivity. Strictly speaking an incentive is always a THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 199 desire for something, but the thing which arouses the desire is also frequently called the incentive. As such, are class grades, class honors, per cents, prizes, etc. Incentives may be divided into two classes: 1. Natural. 2. Artificial. Natural Incentives. — Natural incentives are de- sires for those effects which in the nature of things result from the deed; as the Tcnoivledge and mental growth which result from conscientious study. The one great natural incentive is the mind^s inherent desire for progress. The soul awakes to consciousness with the desire for progress as its deepest and strongest trait. This passion of the soul for knowl- edge and righteousness, this desire for progress is man's distinctive mark. "Progress, man's distinctive mark alone, Not God's, and not the beasts'; God is, they are, Man partly is, and wholly hopes to be." This characteristic of the mind, mental hunger , is called wonder in psychology. Thus wonder is the mind's natural incentive. It has produced science and philosophy. All natural incentives are good for they stimulate the learner to natural, healthy endeavor. Artificial Incentives. — Artificial incentives, as the name implies, are incentives which do not naturally result from the deed. For instance, a parent might pay his child for learning his spelling lesson. The 200 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. child would thus be stimulated to learn spelling lessons from his desire for money. The incentive is un- natural, for a quantity of money is not a natural result of the action. Thus, examinations, per cents, class honors, prizes, etc., come under the head of artificial incentives. Artificial incentives are at the best of doubtful utility. While they may do some good, the evils re- sulting from them probably outweigh by far this good. The best educators in the land condemn them strongly. "The use of such means necessarily kills the desire to know, which is immoral because killing the soul itself. When a teacher, in good faith that the natural process of learning is its own sufficient reward, begins to instruct pupils who have been under the artificial stimulus of the per cent, system, he finds them to be indifferent to legitimate appeals, and ready to affirm that school life is not worth living without the usual excitement and strife for per cent. What hope for such pupils after the days of formal instruction ! The severest criticism that can be made on school work is to show that students after gradu- ation have not a burning desire to pursue a systematic course of study and improvement. The use of false incentives is not the only reason for this; but it is largely chargeable to formal methods of instruction which necessitates artificial incentives, which further render instruction dead and formal. By this process THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 201 the pupil, if not becoming positively averse to study,, feels satisfied and self-sufficient, and having no foreign incentive now offered, he is under no compulsion ta further labor. If study means a contest with ponder- able per centable packages of knowledge, how play the game when there is no one to estimate and umpire? If the school is to determine to a future life of study, the motives appealed to and cultivated in school must be the same as those employed in the natural, health- ful course of life out of school. '* *'The abiding passion of the soul is for knowl- edge, and all the teacher can properly do is to take this fact fairly and at its worth. The passion he may stimulate, make definite, and attach to the proper objects; but he can not introduce a substitute without weakening the life-giving connection between the pupil learning and the object being learned. " Social Influences. — The child is by nature a social being, and will live in society after leaving school. In the school in many instances he first begins to learn his duties with respect to others. In all cases the pupil first begins to come fully into the understand- ing of what it means to live in a society of his equals. In the family the student begins to learn something of living in society, but it is in the school that he first meets with the conditions of society in anything like those in which he will be required to live later. The school forms a transition from the family to the com- plex social life of the community. Here the pupil 202 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. learns something of the difference between doing as he pleases and doing so as to uplift himself and at the same time help those around him. In the school are good opportunities for learning habits of politeness, toleration, charity, order, truthfulness, justice, and industry. But all of this is unity between the learn- er's real and ideal self. Thus social influence is one of the conditions of unity between the real and ideal self. Broken Unity. — In the best regulated schools there will be cases of broken unity. This may happen in any of the following ways: 1. Through ignorance. 2. Through neglect. 3. Through thoughtlessness. 4. Through willfulness. If the child does not know that it is a violation of unity to come to school late, and comes in late, it is a case of broken unity through ignorance. If, however, he knows it is wrong, but neglects to start in time, it is a case of broken unity by neglect. If the learner thoughtlessly plays with the ink well on his desk, and thus breaks the unity by the noise made, it is a case of broken unity through thoughtlessness. If a student purposely insults one of his fellow students or the teacher, he willfully breaks the unity of the school. Since prevention is better than cure, the main aim in school government is in preventing broken unity. This is to be done by establishing conditions for unity and eliminating those unfavorable to unity. This consists first and at all times in establishing a THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 203 sentiment in the lives of students in favor of those things conducive to unity and against those things unfavorable to unity. Restoration of Unity. — When unity in any way in school is broken it must be restored. The ideal con- dition would be to have the school in such an attitude that the unity would he voluntarily restored by the one who broke it. And if students have in mind (1) the nature of the school; (2) the source and nature of the law of the school; and (3) have the proper sentiment toward school behavior, the unity in most cases, when broken, will be spontaneously and voluntarily restored. But since such conditions can not always be maintained, it must at times be restored through the influence of the teacher as an agent. The teacher's work in restoring unity becomes a not difficult task when the conditions insisted on all along in these studies have been established in school. Confidential talks with students in which the teacher in a kind and sympathetic manner calls attention to the offense and the way to correct it may be used with lasting and beneficent results. Often nothing is necessary but to call the student's attention to the misbehavior. However, obstinate cases arise which can not be passed by lightly, and this suggests the question of school punishments. School Punishments. — This is the most delicate as well as the most disagreeable feature of the teacher's work. It requires a great deal of discretion, patience, 204: STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. sympathy, and good sense to punish at all success > fuUy. It should be remembered that punishment in school has the following two purposes: 1. To restore broken unity. 2. To prevent broken unity in the future. And punishment which fails in either or both of these things is not an entire success, but it may easily be an entire failure. If by punishment the teacher, by arousing anger, antagonism, and bad feeling, causes more unity to be broken than restored, the school would have fared better without the administering of punishment. The teacher must not punish for revenge, or with. a vindictive spirit. Punishment must be reformative and preventative, not vindictive. Plato was right when he said only the unreasonable fury of a brute toould punish vindictively. If the teacher finds him- self angry, and it is admitted that occasions for justifiable anger arise in school, he will gain an im- portant victory by not acting till his anger subsides. He will often save a good many heartaches and regrets, too. No recipes can be given for particular cases, but the study of nature's punishments enables us to state the following general rule, which is always safe to follow: The punishment should be what in the nature of" things follows as a result of the offense. THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL. 205 The only difficulty with the guidance which this rule furnishes in school punishments is that of de- termining what the natural result of the offense is. At times it is very difficult to determine what naturally follows as a result of the offense. But in a large number of cases this rule gives absolutely safe guidance. Illustration. — If a student spills water on the floor of the schoolroom through carelessness, the natural thing is to have him clean it up. If again a student by making noise disturbs a certain part of the room, the natural punishment is removal from that part of the room. Corporal Punishment. — Corporal punishment is punishment of the body, as by whipping, beating, etc. The tendency in school government is to discard it entirely. Some cities do not tolerate it at all in their schools. It is, to say the best for it, the device of the teacher who is not sufficiently wise to see a better way. That a better way exists is not doubted by those who have carefully studied the problem. It is a noticable fact that the most skillful teachers everywhere have the least use for corporal punish- ment, while the least skillful resort to it most. If our teachers were all wise enough, and if school conditions were what they should be, no doubt corporal punishment could be abolished in school entirely; but with existing conditions it does seem that it is not entirely wise to wholly condemn and 206 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. forbid its use. However it should be remembered that it is the device of the unskillful, and the ignorant, and is to be used only when all other means have been exhausted. CHAPTER IX. THE PROCESS IN THE TEACHING ACT, — METHOD. The Teaching Act. — The school exists as an organ- ization in order that the most favorable conditions may be furnished for the act of teaching. It is in this act that the mind of the pupil comes into vital touch with the mind of the teacher. Here the miracle of the influence of one mind upon another is mani- fested. Here it is that the most important duty of the teacher is involved. To this process all other processes of the school point. The school finds the idea that created it in the process of realization in the teaching act. The act of teaching is a process for it is a series of steps directed toward the accomplishment of an end. The teaching act is not a simple process for it is a large process made up of smaller processes. The Processes in It. — A brief analysis of the teach- ing act will show that there are three processes going on in it, — (1) the thinking the learner is doing; (2) the thinking the teacher is doing; (3) a process of handling questions, directions, objects, assignments, and so on — the manipulation of means in teaching. The first two of these processes are spiritual, or mental, processes, and the third is external to both 208 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. the mind of the teacher and the pupil and is a physical process. Illustration. — In teaching the definition of a noun to a student, first, the student's mind goes through the process of thinking (1) that the noun is a sub- stantive word; and (2) that it expresses an object by naming it. This is the process in the mind of the student in the teaching act. Secondly, the teacher thinks these same points through with the student, but he thinks several other things, too. This is the spiritual process of the teacher in the teaching act. Thirdly, there is a process of asking questions, illus- trating, possibly referring to text-books, etc., going on, and this is the physical process in the teaching act. Nature of Method as a Subject of Study. — The ques- tion, What is the subject of method like? is often asked. It may be answered in a general way by say- ing it is a subject of study the pursuit of which has for its special object to make teachers more skillful in teaching than they would be without such study. But this much might be said of any pedagogical study — of psychology, for instance. To be more definite, method as a subject is that study which deals with the three processes in the act of teaching as indicated above. These three processes in their various phases constitute the material of all study in the subject of method. The Subject-matter of Method.— By subject-matter is meant the material of study in any subject or lesson. THE PROCESS IN THE TEACHING ACT, — METHOD. 209 It is the thought and feeling embodied in any subject or lesson which are to be got from such subject or lesson by study. It always consists of facts and relations among such facts. So the subject-matter of method, as a subject of study, is the three processes, one in the mind of the learner, one in the mind of the teacher, and one a physical process, in their relation to the growth in the life of the learner. Definition of Method. — Method is thus seen to be a complex and comprehensive thing. Any definition to be perfectly accurate, must include the various phases of these three processes. The following, it seems, does this: Method is the triple process in the act of teaching by tvhich the learner is induced to take the steps from his real condition to a higher condition held up as an ideal. This is the definition of method considered in its broadest and most comprehensive sense, and the sense in which its study will give the most help to the teacher. Classes of Method. — Since there are three proc- esses going on in the teaching act there are, in a sense, three methods, — the learner's method, the teacher's method, and physical method. These three will be studied somewhat in detail. The Learner's Method. — The learner's method is the movement of his mind in gaining any point of knowledge. The pupil's method is thus a living, spiritual process internal to his life. Method from this point of view is mental growth. That is to say, 210 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. it is the change of potential mental activity into actual mental activity, and this is the essence of growth. Illustration. — If the child learns in a number lesson that 8 -f- 7 = 15, the activity of his mind in thinking the following steps is his method: (1) the mind rethinks the number 8; (2) the mind rethinks the number 7; (3) the mind thinks the number 8 and 7 together; (4) the mind thinks the name of the new number. These four steps are the mind's process in thinking the point of knowledge, and are, therefore, the mind's method. This phase of method calls attention to the fact that the thing to be watched and emphasized in teaching is the change in the learner's life by which he is constantly rising to a higher plane of living. Definition of the Learner's Method, — The learner's method may be characterized by the following defi- nitions: 1. The learner's method is the process of the learner's mind in learning a thing. 2. The learner's method is the movement by which his mind identifies itself with the thought and feeling of the external world. 3. The learner's method is the mental activity by which his mind makes the objective the subjective. The objective means the external world, and the subjective means the self. And the self means one's original capacity to know, to feel, and to will, plus the effect of one's experiences on this capacity. THE PROCESS IN THE TEACHING ACT, — METHOD. 211 4. The learner's method is the process in which his mind goes from its real condition to an ideal con- dition. One's real condition is his condition just as he is at any time. His ideal condition is one different from what he is in at any time, and which actually has no existence except as an idea in the mind; hence the name ideal. The ideal condition is not necessarily a better condition than the real, but may be either a better or worse condition. The Teacher's Method. — The teacher's method is the thinking he does in teaching a thing. The teacher 's method is a very important topic of study in the sub- ject of method. It must be thoroughly understood by one who is to succeed best. First, the teacher must think the thought in the point or points to be taught; that is, he must think the subject-matter. Secondly, he must see in terms of development of the learner's life the reasons for teaching the subject-matter; that is, he must see the purpose. Thirdly, the teacher must see the nearest related knowledge possessed by the learner which he can use as a foundation to build upon in teaching the new point; that is, he must see the basis. Fourthly, the teacher must see the activities the learner's mind puts forth in mastering the points of truth in the subject-matter; that is, he must see the steps. Lastly, the teacher must see the means he may best employ in leading the mind of the learner to take the steps in mastering the subject-matter; that is, the teacher 212 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. must think out the devices. Thus the teacher in teaching a lesson must think (1) the subject-matter; (2) the purpose; (3) the basis; (4) the steps; and (5) the devices. These five things every teacher does in some sort of way in teaching every lesson. Some think them out clearly and accurately, and some think them out scarcely at all, and do not know that they do even that much. A teacher can think the teaching of a single point, or of a whole lesson, or of a whole subject, under these five heads, and must do so with more or less accuracy in teaching. It is worth our while to study these five points further for the help the study will give. Subject-matter.— In a general way the subject- matter is that which is to be mastered by study. It Is the thought embodied in the thing studied by the mind of the learner. In a particular lesson the sub- ject-matter is just that to be got from the lesson which the learner should have after the recitation. In a particular subject, as grammar or history, the subject-matter is just that to be got from the subject which the learner should be in possession of after the study of the subject. In this general sense the sub- ject-matter of education is the whole world of thought. This study is too general to be most helpful. A closer study will reveal the fact that every subject- matter is composed of two things: (1) The facts to be taught. (2) The relation in which these facts are to be taught or studied. THE PROCESS IN THE TEACHING ACT, — METHOD. 213 Illustration, — Suppose the words, inquiry y dis. course, and aspirant are to be taught. Now, a spelling lesson might be made of it; and if it were a spelling lesson, the subject-matter would be, the words, in- quiry, discourse, and aspirant, as to their correct written or printed forms. Thus the words, inquiry, discourse, and aspirant are the facts to be taught or studied, and ''as to their correct written or printed form " indicates the relation in which they are to be taught or studied. But these same facts might be used, and the lesson not be a spelling lesson at alL If the relation in which they are to be studied or taught is as to their correct pronunciation the lesson would be one in orthoepy, and the subject-matter would be, the words, inquiry, discourse, and aspirant as to their correct pronunciation. Further Illustration. — Suppose the facts of the revolution of the earth around the sun are taught, who can say whether the lesson is one in astronomy or one in geography? If, however, these are taught in their relation to the distribution of life, climate and relief forms on the earth's surface, the lesson at once reveals itself as a geography lesson. From these illustrations it is to be seen that a subject-matter consists of (1) the facts to be taught or studied; and (2) the relation in which these facts are to be con- sidered. This relation is often called the organizing principle of the subject-matter. General Statement of Subject-matter. — The state- ment of subject-matter is not the subject-matter any 214 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. more than a word is an idea, or a sentence a thought. The statement of the subject-matter bears the same relation to the subject-matter that the word bears to the idea and that the sentence bears to the thought; that is, the statement bears the same relation to the subject-matter that the symbol does to the thing symbolized. The general statement of a subject-matter is very valuable to a teacher, whether it be of a single lesson, or of a whole subject. It is helpful to the teacher because it must do two things: (1) it must name the facts to be taught, and (2) it must tell the relation in which these facts are to be taught. Thus the general statement of the subject-matter of any subject is a perennial guide to the teacher in teaching that sub- ject, in that it shows, in a general way, what to teach and in what relation (how) to teach it. Purpose. — Purpose in reality is beginning and end in every process. The purpose as idea — the be- ginning — moves forward in the process to its reali- zation — the end. The purpose exists in the teacher's mind, but it is to be realized in the life of the learner. The purpose is the effect the mastery of the subject- matter should have on the life of the child. In actual teaching the teacher is to go from the subject-matter by way of comparison of the effect the thinking the subject-matter has on his own mind to its effect on the child's life, which is the purpose. That is to say, there is no way to tell the purpose of the subject- THE PROCESS IN THE TEACHING ACT, — METHOD. 215 matter except from the effect its mastery produces on the child's life. The course of study — the subject- matter — is usually provided for the teacher. So the teacher must start with the subject-matter and find out the purpose in teaching it. Much depends in the teaching act upon how well the teacher does this. If the teacher has definitely in mind just what he wants to do in the lesson he will be drawn steadily and constantly toward its accomplishment. A definite purpose saves time, economizes energy, emphasizes the important, organizes, and prevents aimless wan- dering. It will be seen that in teaching any lesson there are two phases of the purpose: (1) to give knowledge valuable for guidance in living; (2) to give mental discipline; that is, to furnish a mental gymnastic to the end that the mind may grow strong by exercising it. Basis. — This is the learner's nearest related knowledge to the new points to be taught, and upon which the teacher may build in teaching the new point. Basis is an important point in teaching. Many errors are made in teaching because the learner has not basis for learning the new point, or because the teacher does not see the basis. Teaching in harmony with the principle underlying basis, the mind naturally goes to the unknown from the nearest related Tcnoivn, means a progressive development of a subject, each step becoming basis for the step succeeding it. There 216 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. are many violations of basis in teaching, as often done. Illustration. — If the lesson to be taught is that 5 -f- 4 = 9, the child must know the number 5 and the number 4 as basis before he could learn that 5 + 4 = 9. If the teacher should attempt to teach this lesson without having taught the numbers 5 and 4 he would meet with the difficulty of insufficient basis. Again, if a teacher attempts to teach the noun to a class without the class having a definite knowledge of an object, he will most surely meet a difficulty in the basis. The teacher to teach well must see and choose definitely his basis. Steps. — Steps are more or less complete move- ments of the mind. They are mental things and in the teaching act are in the life of the learner. They are the advances of the mind in mastering the sep- arate points of the lesson to be learned. Or in a more general sense they are the advances of the mind in mastering the various phases of a subject. Illustration. — If the lesson to be taught were that 17 — 8 = 9, the steps would be: 1. The advance of the mind in rethinking the number 17. 2. The ad- vance of the mind in rethinking the number 8. 3. The advance of the mind in thinking the number 9 as remainder. Again, if the lesson were, to teach the definition of the triangle, after examining several triangles, the steps would be: 1. The advance of the mind in thinking a triangle is a figure. 2. The THE PROCESS IN THE TEACHING ACT,— METHOD. 217 advance of the mind in thinking a triangle has three sides. 3. The advance of the mind in thinking a triangle has three angles. 4. The advance of the mind in synthesizing these points in the definition, A triangle is a figure having three sides and three angles. To know the steps the mind takes in working out any new lesson is a matter of much importance to the teacher. He must know something of the steps or he cannot teach at all; and, other things equal, the more clearly the teacher has thought out the steps, the better will he teach the lesson. Devices. — The devices are the various things used by the teacher to lead the mind of the learner to think and feel in the manner desired. A synonym for devices is the term means. Devices, or means, con- stitute a very important factor in teaching. There is opportunity for the exercise of rare judgment, tact, and skill in the selection of devices. When it is understood that questions, text-books, and reference books, maps, globes, and school apparatus in general; blocks, sticks, etc., are devices in teaching, some- thing of their importance in school work becomes evident. Devices are so important that among many, method means nothing more than the manipulation of devices. However important they are it must not be lost sight of that they are always determined in the light of the mental process they are to induce. They are means to an end, and in nature the end is always more important than the means. 218 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. Method as a Physical Process. — It is, perhaps, using the term method in its most popular significance to think of it as meaning some physical process external to the life of the learner. That is to say, it is using the term in the sense in which most persons com- monly use it in speaking and writing. This idea of method is the one usually held by persons who have not made any careful study of what the term really ought to mean. There is a sort of indefiniteness in the minds of such persons as to just what they do mean by method. However, upon examination it will be found usually that the idea that method is the manner of doing some physical thing prevails, though even this is held in mind more or less vaguely. From thinking of method in this sense we have the following terms; "Object Method, " ''Concert Method, " ''Con- secutive Method," "Promiscuous Method," "Lecture Method," "Socratic Method," and "Laboratory Method." These all refer to the manipulation of objects, questions, and answers in the teaching act, and so are to be studied briefly under method as a physical process. The Object Method. — By this is meant the handling of objects by teacher and pupils in the process of teaching. It is a good line of work, if used judicious- ly. It has its proper place in teaching number work primary reading, nature study, primary geography, and primary language. THE PROCESS IN THE TEACHING ACT, — METHOD. 219 The Concert Method. — ^The concert method means having students to answer questions, read, and speak simultaneously in the recitation. There is much that may be said against concert work, but very little to be said for it. It is objectionable because it (1) violates the law of self -activity; (2) stifles individual effort and individual responsibility; (3) does not bring out clear, definite answers or thinking; and (4) leads to confusion, disorder, and chaotic class work. There may possibly be instances in which concert work may be used advantageously, but as a rule it should iDe avoided. The Consecutive Method. — The consecutive method of asking and answering in the recitation means be- ginning at some point, the head of the class, or at the name beginning with A, and proceeding in some regular order back to the point of starting. In pro- ceeding in recitation this way the students know pretty well when the "turn" of each one will come. This method, like the preceding one, has many things against it, but little to recommend it. It is objection- able because it leads to (1) habits of inattention; (2) disorder and disorganization of the class; (3) habits of idleness; and (4) bad methods of study. However good a student may be, if, when he has answered a question, he knows to a certainty that he will not be called upon again for some time, the tendency is for him to relax his attention. If the student is not a ^ood one, the tendency in this kind of work is for him 220 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. to become worse, and since he is not called upon ta attend closely he is prone to do something else, there- by causing disorder and disorganization. Idleness in the class is a direct result of inattention, and bad habits of study result from the student's being able to prepare just those points in the lesson which he has reckoned will come to him. Promiscuous Method. — The promiscuous method of asking questions and receiving answers refers to distributing the questions and receiving answers from students promiscuously. No student knows to whom the answer to the question will fall. This method unlike the two preceding has much to be said for it and little or nothing against it. It is desirable because (1) it fosters habits of attention and concen- tration; (2) it is flexible and gives the teacher the best opportunities for meeting the needs of individual students; (3) it fosters habits of order and organiza- tion in the class work; and (4) it tends to industrious habits, and right methods of study. By the use of the promiscuous method students are held constantly to attending to the question under consideration, to the careful preparation of the lesson as a whole, and to order and unity in the class. As a rule, the pro- miscuous method is certainly the best for class work. Lecture Method. — The lecture method refers to teaching by means of talks, or lectures. This method, perhaps, has its advantages and disadvantages. It is certainly not adapted to all kinds of school work, and THE PRCX:!ESS IN THE TEACHING ACT,— METHOD. 221 probably not adapted to any kind of school work if used exclusively. There are, however, some phases of school work which may be taught profitably by talks, or lectures. To elementary school work the lecture method is not at all adapted, and but very poorly adapted to secondary school work. In the first eight years of the child's school life he must be taught differently than by this method. That stays with the child which he has an opportunity to see, hear, and think about. This, however, is not to be construed to mean that oral teaching should not be done in primary history, primary geography, nature work, etc. If the lecture method has any legitimate place in school work it is in the coUege and university. However it may seem theoretically, it remains a fact that those things which are digged out by the student, recited upon in the class, and dis- cussed by questions and answers are the things which in the end stay with him and do him good. Certainly the lecture method in the average teacher's school work is, to say the least, to be used sparingly, and -with much caution when used at all. The Socratic Method. — This method takes its name from Socrates, a Greek philosopher and teacher, born 469 B. C. It is sometimes called the developing method. It proceeds by the employment of subtle questions to lead the student to think what it is de- sired for him to think without telling him anything. *'The Socratic method, more or less perfectly under- 222 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. stood, has had great influence upon professional pedagogy. In many schools for the professional training of teachers, and in many schools in charge of teachers professionally trained, systematic ques- tioning of this sort is looked upon as ideal teaching; and there is no lack of conscientious endeavor to prepare for use in recitation, series of questions which shall lead the child's mind to take the logical steps which given occasion requires. One who doubts the value of such systematic questioning may usually be converted by hearing a single typical recitation con- ducted by a master of the art. The power of such a recitation to touch, move, chasten and direct the soul is so evident, that if Socrates and Plato had taught us nothing but how to do such work their fame as teachers would be justified." It is noteworthy that the ''Socratic Method" is diametrically opposed to the "Lecture Method." The Laboratory Method. — This is also often called the '* Scientific Method," or ''Inductive Method, "and it means a procedure in which the student is lead to investigate and think for himself. It is opposed to taking things on mere authority without investiga- tion, and to the text-book method. It proceeds by leading the student to deal with the actual material of study rather than to deal with what some one has said about it. In botany, studied in this way, the student deals with plants; in zoology, with animals; in grammar, with sentences and parts of sentences. THE PROCESS IN THE TEACHING ACT,— METHOD. 22S This method has much to recommend it. 1. It fosters habits of free inquiry and free investigation. 2. It is the mind's natural way of learning. 3. It makes the student self-directive and self-helpful. 4. It fixes with the student right methods of study. 5. It gives the student a critical attitude of mind. All these are very desirable characteristics for a student to have. Comparison of Teacher^ s and PupiVs Method. — These two methods are alike as follows: 1. They are both spiritual processes. 2. The mind of the learner and the mind of the teacher in general go through the same process in thinking the thing to be learned. 3. Both the teacher and the pupil keep in mind to some extent the purpose of the process in the teaching act. These two methods are different as follows: 1. The teacher, in addition to thinking the truths to be learned, must think the learner's thinking of them. 2. The teacher must think out the means or devices to be used in leading the learner to think the desired points of truth. 3. While both the teacher and the pupil keep in mind the purpose, the teacher sees it definitely, or should do so, while the pupil only sees it vaguely. The teacher's method thus includes more than the learner's. Two Vieivs of Method.— The foregoing study sug- gests to us that there are two views of method. It is unfortunate that educational writers hold these twa 224 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. views, as considerable confusion prevails because of this fact. One class of educators, those who have studied method least, mean by method simply the physical process in the act of teaching. A second class, those who have been special students of method, mean by method the triple process in the act of teach- ing. Comparison of the Two Views. — In our study of method we may call these two views respectively the popular vieiv and the special view. The popular view -will thus designate method as the manipulation of ex- ternal means, or devices, and the special view will designate method as the triple process. Thinking of method according to the popular view constantly places the mind's emphasis upon some- thing external to the life of the learner. This has in the past led to much that was bad in teaching and is still doing so. The teacher loses sight thus of the fact that it is in the learner's life that the educating process is to be carried on. He is prone to make the manipulating, the text-book, or some petty scheme of teaching an end instead of a means. Every ques- tion that arises concerning teaching must be settled in the light of the effect upon the life of the learner. The ultimate question is. How does it affect the life of the learner? The process in which the mind of the learner masters the new point of knowledge is the point of prime importance in the teaching act and the thing always to be emphasized in the study of the THE PROCESS IN THE TEACHING ACT,— METHOD. 225 act of teaching. The popular view of method leads to almost hopeless confusion. Everyone holding this view who happens to use some different device, or means, in teaching calls it his method and gives it a name. Since there is an almost infinite number of devices which may be used, there thus arises an al- most infinite number of methods, which no teacher can or desires to keep informed upon. This leads to a hopelessly chaotic condition of things in the study of method. The popular view of method has lead to much dis- paragement of the study of method among persons who should be friendly to its study. These are often- times persons who are very good thinkers, but who have not given special study to method. It is a com- mon remark among this class of teachers that one may study method in a subject at the expense of a knowledge of that subject. The depreciating remarks made about method, which arise from the popular view of method, are a source of much harm to the profession of teaching. This is true, because many persons who would otherwise make a careful study of method and would receive the benefit that must come to the teacher thereby, are kept from beginning the study by this disparaging attitude on the part of some teachers. It may be safely said that there is need for no one thing among teachers more than an intensely professional spirit. It seems strange that some teachers take pleasure in saying depreciating 226 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. things about method work. It is, however, probably to be explained from a misconception of method. I have never yet heard the first person speak depre- ciatingly of method, who had been a student of the subject. The special view may be proven to be the better view. This is the argument: A thing is good ac- cordingly as it realizes the purpose which brought it into existence. Method as a subject came into ex- istence to supply the want for something, the study of which would help the teacher to do better work in his daily teaching. Accordingly, that thing whose study helps the teacher most is the best. It has already been shown that the study of method as a triple process is more helpful to the teacher than the study of method as the manner of manipulating some external means, or device. Therefore, the special view is the better view of method. No Danger in Too 3Iioch Study. — It is not difficult to see that there is no danger of a teacher's devoting too much time to the study of method when one takes the proper view of method. The teacher can not study the process through which the mind goes in mastering any point of knowledge until he has the knowledge himself. For instance, the teacher can not see the mental steps the mind of the learner takes in learning the definition of an adjective without knowing the definition of an adjective himself. To know the method in teaching the definition of an THE PROCESS IN THE TEACHING ACT, — METHOD. 227 adjective is to know two things: 1. The definition of an adjective. 2. The process the mind naturally employs in learning the definition of an adjective. No teacher can rationally and well teach the adjective who does not know both. Further Illustration. — In the teaching of history this point becomes quite evident. The teacher wha knows method in history knows these two things: 1. The events of mankind in their relation to the struggle of the race for higher life. That is to say, he must know history. 2. The natural processes of the mind in learning history. No teacher can teach history at all without a knowledge of the first, and it is equally clear to any person who will think, that no one can teach history well without a knowledge of the second. So this question reduces itself to the following: It is not possible for a teacher to study method too much, unless it is possible for a teacher to know too much about his subjects and to know too weU the mind's natural process in learning those subjects. Factors Determining MetJiod. — About twenty years ago one of the leading educators of this country said ' ' The laio in the mind and the thought in the thing studied determine the method.^' This statement of this truth can not well be improved upon. It shows that the two following things are factors in determining the method to be pursued in teaching any subject whatever: 1. The law in the mind. "228 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. 2. The thought in the thing studied. That these two factors are the ones which deter- mine every rational method makes the above state- ment a universal truth. The Law in the Mind. — The law in the mind has reference to the general truths of mind — the forms of activity common to minds. Holding in mind that method is the triple activity in the process of teaching, it can easily be seen that this process must be largely what it is because of what the mind can do; that is, because of the laws governing mental activity. Again, the method would be different in teaching the same subject-matter to a child of eight and to an adult, because it is a law of the mind that the mind of the child of eight could sense-perceive, remember, and imagine accurately, but that he could not reason accurately, while the adult should be able to do so. The Thought in the Thing. — Each thing is the -embodiment of thought; that is, each thing in the uni- verse is capable of suggesting a thought to the mind. "Evangeline," the rose, the lily, is each the embodi- ment of thought. Again remembering what method is, it can read- ily be seen that the process is different in teaching different things, and so the method is different. The process in teaching the noun as to definition and in teaching *'Maud Muller" as to interpretation is widely different, because of the difference in the THE PROCESS IN THE TEACHING ACT, — METHOD. 229- thought embodied in them. And since method is the triple process in the act of teaching, the method is widely different, the cause of the difference being the difference in the thought in the two things. Thus these two things, the mind of the learner^ and the subject-matter, determine the method. The whole study of general method should em- phasize the truth that the essential thing in teaching is opening up the tvay for the realization of the child's in- herent possibilities. "Truth is within ourselves; it takes no rise From outward things, whate'er you may believe^ There is an inmost center in us all, Where truth abides in fullness, and around, Wall upon wall, the gross flesh hems it in, ******* ^j^(j ^Q know Rather consists in opening out a way Whence the imprisoned splendor may escape, Than in effecting entry for a light Supposed to be without." CHAPTER X. THE RECITATION. The Nature of the Recitation, — The word, recitation ^ is of Latin origin and literally means a reading aloud. As the term is used now in connection with school work something of the literal meaning may be found in it. But there is more in the recitation as thought of now than the mere reading or speaking aloud. A written recitation might be conducted in which the original notion of the recitation is scarcely to be found at all. The recitation is the school process in which the learner rethinks what he has learned in previous study and communicates this to the teacher and his fellow students. This, however, is not all there is in the recitation, but constitutes a considerable part of the process. In addition to the student's process of rethinking and communicating to the teacher, and other students, what he has previously learned, there are in the recitation the suggestions^ tests, directions , and encouragement by the teacher. The recitation is the crowning process of school work. It is in the recitation more than in any other place that the learner is stimulated to the effort of THE RECITATION. 231 learning. Good recitations are the test of good school work. Purposes of the Recitation, — The following are the purposes of the recitation: 1. To furnish a process in which the mind of the learner and the mind of the teacher may come into living touch with each other. 2. To test the learner on his preparation and understanding of the subject-matter of the lesson. 3. To supplement the knowledge of the subject- matter the student has gained in his preparation. 4. To give the learner the habit of right methods of study. 5. To approve, encourage, inspire, and stimulate the learner in his work. Vital Touch of Learner ^s and Teacher^ s Mind. — In order that instruction may be most effective the mind of the learner must come under the influence of the mind of the teacher with conditions as favorable for learning as possible. This is needed that in the act of teaching the life of the teacher may come into closest touch with the life of the pupil. That the conditions may be the most favorable the class should recite in a room separate from that in which the school is accustomed to sit and study. Since this is not possible in so many schools, the next best thing is to have the pupils to occupy a position in the room as nearly isolated from the other students as possible. Separate recitation rooms, though, are 232 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. always the best, for in them all diverting influences can be reduced to the minimum, and the conditions for learning be best maintained. Testing on the Preparation of the Lesson. — Good teaching requires that some definite thing be de- manded daily of the learner. And the requirement of tests on the preparation and understanding of what is demanded is imperative. The responsibility of getting up before the class and stating to the class and the teacher what he has learned is a constant spur to the student in his work. Negligence and looseness in study always result from the assignment of lessons upon which students never recite. There is no surer way to induce bad habits of study than to assign lessons and then not test students as to their preparation and understanding of these lessons. And the tendency is in this direction, even though one has the best students to be found. If students are not good there is nothing in such work to make them better, on the other hand they become worse. The responsibility of proper preparation is brought home to the student in no other way so well as in the class room at recitation. Every one knows how prone he is to neglect work which he has planned to do because of a lack of a definite responsibility. The tests in the recitation fix and maintain a definite responsibility. The testing to be most helpful must be accurate^ critical, and just. Students are often deceived in thinking they have prepared well their lessons when THE RECITATION. 23^ they have not, because the testing is poorly done in the recitation. It frequently happens that a student makes a recitation which is worth nearly nothing, but the teacher by smoothing it over and patching it- up makes the student think he has done something creditable. The student is thus misled and is per- fectly willing for the teacher to do the same thing^ again. If a student neglects to prepare his lesson, he should be brought face to face with his ignorance which might have been removed. Supplementing a Knotvledge of the Lesson. — It is not to be expected that the student will at all times- completely master the subject-matter of the lesson. Points more or less vague to the learner or of which he has obtained a wrong idea will often become clear and correct to him by recitations of other students and the illustrations of the teacher. And many times points which the student has not been able to work out will be cleared up to him upon the teacher 's asking him questions which lead to their solution. And again there are points which the student can get from no other source than from the teacher. These the teacher may give directly to the student and save time and guessing on his part. It has been stated as a principle of pedagogy that the teacher should never tell a student anything lohich he can find out for himself This statement emphasizes an important pedagogical truth, no doubt, for the tendency certainly is among teachers to tell students 234 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. many things which they should be led to work out for themselves, as the easiest way out of it, when the •student fails to respond properly to a question. But to follow the principle literally would also lead to ^rave errors. For instance, if a child were standing hj the fire and without his knowledge his clothes should catch fire, he would find it out without being told sooner or later. But no one would think of wait- ing for him to find it out so. One purpose of the recitation certainly is to sup- plement the knowledge the student gets from his preparation of the lesson. Giving an Insight into Bight Methods of Study. — It often happens that students are willing to prepare their lessons, but that they do not know how to study. The teacher has opportunity in the recitation in two ways to show the student how to study: 1. He can show the student how to study by his requirements in the daily work of the recitation. If the student is constantly held accurately to the care- ful preparation of each point assigned, he will soon come to understand what it means to prepare a lesson; and from what is worked out on the separate points, he will see what is to be done with each point by way of preparation. 2. In the recitation from time to time the teacher may take the points one by one and show the students just how to proceed in their preparation. This the teacher must do occasionally, if he would have THE RECITATION. 235 his students use their time and energy to the best advantage. Approving, Encouraging, Inspiring, and Stimulat- ing. — Young people and old, too, are oftentimes gladdened by a word of approval. The teacher's op- portunity for approving of that v^orthy of approval, and disapproving of that not worthy of approval is a means in his hands of working much good. Teachers are too ready to disapprove of the bad and to let the meritorious pass by as if unnoticed. Every child is capable of something worthy, and should be made to feel so. Just approval in the recitation is a perfectly legitimate incentive, and may be used to do much good by the careful, sympathetic teacher. Pupils frequently have spells of despondency and discouragement in their school work. This comes about from extravagant ideas of what a pupil should accomplish, or a somewhat mistaken idea of native ability, etc. In the recitation the teacher has an opportunity to dispel the despondency and encourage by placing before the students healthful ideals of student life. The teacher by taking the soul's hunger at its worth and so teaching as to stimulate and quicken it has an opportunity to inspire the learner to a life of search for truth and righteousness. And the teacher who can so teach that his pupils will be inspired to study his subjects after leaving school, in the pursuit of wisdom and virtue, is a most successful teacher. 286 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. The Law of the Recitation, — The law of the reel* tation is the same as the law of the school as a whole; that is, the law of unity. Without unity between the teacher and pupils the recitation could not exist, but it often actually exists with various degrees of unity. When the minds of all the students are following the mind of the teacher as the recitation progresses there is ideal unity. To approach this condition of things is always to be sought; and, other things equal, the recitation will be successful in the degree to which this is attained. Either the pupils or the teacher may break the law of unity in the recitation. The student may break it by failing to give atten- tion when he ought to do so. Whispering breaks the unity always, and while not in itself necessarily wrong, is a positive sin when engaged in during the recitation. It is to be deplored that there is a teacher in the land who can not see the question of whispering in school in its true light, and who does not set the stamp of disapproval upon it. It is absolutely inde- fensible as a practice. There are many other ways of breaking the unity of the recitation. The teacher may break the unity by conducting the recitation in such a way that there can not by any possibility be unity, as indicated by the following quotation: "Here is a picture taken from real life: School- room of two grades (seventh and eighth), of about twenty pupils each. Good teacher, as the world goes; THE RECITATION. 237 lesson in denominate numbers by the seventh grade. Teacher directs one boy to pass to the board and solve the first problem; another the second; and so on till the ten problems are used. Then, commencing again with the first problem, re-assigns the ten prob- lems severally to the next ten pupils. A few pupils remain without work, and these are given selected problems to work at the desk, the board all being occupied. The teacher now steps back to talk to the visitor while waiting developments. Things always develop rapidly under such circumstances; and soon the teacher is needed by a girl working at her desk, where teacher and pupil discuss the problem. Note here that it is all right for teacher and pupil to talk during the recitation, because the teacher makes the rules: two pupils must not talk; except to help each other, as they say. And this they soon do, for the bright girl points the way to the dull boy. The first boy has done his sum; and, rather than waste time, punches the fire, which is already too hot. Another bright lad cultivates the fantasy and freehand draw- ing; while some laggards toil on, with and without help, hopeless, and despairing of victory before time is called. The first boy explains to those who have done their work, while others toil on. Fill out the picture at your leisure. In all it was a splendid dis- play of self -activity, free thought and free speech." The law of unity in the recitation demands short recitation periods. When the minds of the pupils 238 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. become fatigued to any great extent, it is impossible to maintain the unity. Forty minutes is probably long enough for any recitation period and in the case of young students it should, of course, be much less, its length depending upon the ability of the pupils to give sustained concentrated attention. The Teacher's Preparation for the Recitation. — No teacher can do his best work without making daily preparation for his recitations. This preparation by the teacher is called lesson planning. Thus lesson planning means the process, on the part of the teacher, of working through each lesson a short time before teaching it with the view of teaching it to some particular class. In short, it is the teacher's im- mediate preparation for teaching each lesson. Daily lesson planning is thus an absolute necessity to the teacher who will do the best teaching of which he is capable. No teacher, then, should ever go before his class to teach a lesson without having planned it for this particular recitation. This may seem too much of a requirement to some teachers, since it will of a necessity demand many sacrifices of them. To those who object on this ground, it may be said that the most successful school work demands just this sacrifice and more, and that those who are unwilling to give it should relin- quish their claims as successful teachers to those who are willing. Also, according to the law of the survival of the fittest these very teachers in the strug- THE RECITATION. 23^ gle for excellency will be pushed to the rear that their places may be occupied by those more worthy. And daily preparation will not be found to de- mand so much sacrifice as it at first appears. The teacher will grow in skill in lesson planning in a short time to such an extent that he will find that he caa plan each lesson in a very few minutes. This of course presumes that he has a fair degree of scholar- ship in the subjects which he teaches. No better means exists to arouse interest and maintain it in the class than that of planning each lesson. It works out as follows: the teacher having planned his lesson, as a general plans a battle, comes to the recitation full of expectation and interest to see if all things will work out as they were thought in the planning. The pupils, according to the law of sym- pathy, catch the interest and expectation from th& teacher, and in turn manifest an intense interest. This is but one, however, of the many benefits which come to the teacher from lesson planning. But the teacher's intentions may be excellent, and yet he may not succeed well because he has no systematic way of planning lessons. In other words the teacher may see the necessity of lesson planning, but may not know how to plan a lesson. It wiU be remembered that under the head of the ' ' Teacher's: ifei/iO(^," it has been shown that in teaching a lesson the teacher must think through {l)the subject-matter; (2) the purpose; (3) the basis; (4) the steps; and (5) the :240 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. devices. Systematic lesson planning consists in thinking out as accurately as possible just these five things before attempting to teach a lesson. Some teachers say one can depend upon the in- spiration of the moment in teaching and that lesson planning is not necessary. But the worst failures as "teachers are those who attempt to depend upon the inspiration of the moment and find that the moment comes and goes without the inspiration. Inspiration is not a thing so easily got as to come along to help out the teacher who has not prepared himself for his recitation. Inspiration results from properly pre- paring one's self for his class work. Manner of Conducting the Recitation. — The manner of conducting the recitation is a point of sufficient importance to repay careful study, for upon it de- pends to a considerable degree the success of the teacher. The teacher who has a mild, pleasant way of leading his students in recitation inspires them with confidence, respect and love; while the loud, boisterous, explosive teacher fails in securing these very necessary attitudes of his pupil's minds. Recitations should be both oral and written. The oral should doubtless predominate, but they should be varied occasionally with written recitations. This is because the pupils wiU be called upon in life both in and out of school work to communicate their thought and feeling in both oral and written dis- course. To know is good, but it is not entirely suf- THE RECITATION. 241 ficient. It was said a long time ago that he who does not know is an ignoramus, and that he who knows, but can not communicate what he knows and feels is a dumb statue. All of the following ways of manipulating ques- tions and answers have been used in conducting the recitation, and have been called methods of conducting it: 1. The concert method. 2. The consecutive method. 8. The promiscuous method. 4. The lec- ture method. 5. The Socratic method. The various so called methods of conducting the recitation have already been studied (See page 218), and their merits and demerits pointed out. So while they should be rethought, they will not be rediscussed here. Assignments. — ^The assignment is a proper topic of study in connection with the recitation, for it is the teacher's most effective means of stimulating the students to properly prepare for the recitation. There is no other device in the hands of the teacher that may be used so effectively as assignments. Clear, definite, logical assignments bring clear, definite, logical thinking in the recitation. On the other hand bad, indefinite assignments bring unsatisfactory recitations and lead to bad habits of thinking. As a rule a teacher will get just about as good recitations as are good his assignments. The teacher by skillful assignments can lead his pupils to pursue almost any desired line of thinking. 242 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. Every assignment in any subject should place before the class a definite problem for solution, and it must be stated in such a way that the learner will see what is required of him; and it must suggest the general plan to be pursued in solving the problem. An assignment might be bad in any of these three ways. Many of us can remember when the teacher said as the assignment, **Take the next lesson." Audit is also easily remembered that we frequently did not know how to take it, when to take it, nor where to take it, and that we were little better off after taking than before taking. The assignment is a most powerful means in the hands of the conscientious teacher for doing his stu- dents lasting good. Common Errors in Conducting the Recitation. — The following are some of the most prevalent errors which teachers are prone to fall into and which they should studiously avoid; 1. Giving assignments not suf- ficiently definite. 2. Permitting students to wander from the question. 3. Repeating questions before giving students time to answer. 4. Repeating the answer. 5. Calling on the student before asking the question. 6. Talking too much. 7. Calling too much upon the brighter students for recitation. Indefinite assignments were studied in the pre- ceding topic and nothing further is necessary here unless it is to emphasize what was said there. The THE RECITATION. 24S importance of definite, logical assignments in teach- ing, however, can not be well overestimated. To have the student answer just the question asked and stop then, teaches him to talk to the point and stop when he has finished it. But to talk to the point and stop when one has reached it is the charac- teristic of a well trained mind. Other things equal, that teacher who holds the students to just the question asked does his students by far the most good. And that student who answers just the ques- tion asked is as a rule the best thinker. The habit of repeating the question before giving students time to answer fosters habits of inattention, and leads to bad habits of study. The student does not feel the necessity of giving concentrated habits of attention since he has a right to expect the teacher to repeat the question. Also, the tendency on the part of the teacher is to make the answer to the question a little easier each time he asks it, and this leads to poor preparation and bad habits of study. There seems to be an almost incontrollable habit among teachers to repeat the answer to a question immediately when the student has given it. It is in itself not only unnecessary, but positively harmful. It tends to habits of inattention on the part of the students in the class who are not reciting. Why need they pay respectful attention to the student who is reciting, if the teacher wiU repeat the answer once, twice, or often three times? 244 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. By calling on the student before asking the ques- tion, opportunity is afforded the other students in the class to relax their attention. If the teacher asks the question, hesitates momentarily, then calls oa some one for the answer, the attention of the whole class will be better held; for no one knows but that he will be called on to recite. Talking too much is perhaps the most general of all the common errors in conducting a recitation. Many teachers literally talk their students to sleep and some almost talk their students to death. Too much talking kills interest; violates the students' self- activity; fosters bad habits of study; stifles individual endeavor, and robs the student of the pleasure of his own effort. Teachers have to watch themselves to avoid falling into the habit of calling too much on the brighter students. It is not just to the weaker ones who usually need the opportunity of reciting more than their more fortunate companions. INDEX. Activities of the mind, 74. Aim in life, 31. Relation of these aims, 32. All knowing indirect, 76. Apperception, 69. Aptitude, Natural, 173. Approving, 235. Assignments, 241. Association, 97. Laws of, 98. Attention, 67. Classes of, 68. Attribute, 63. Classes of, 63. of mind, 63. Basis, 215. Beginning point, 13. Behavior, 185. Child Study and curriculum, 145. Cleanliness, 56. Clothing, 43. Concept, 105. Method of forming, 105. Aspects of, 107. Conception, 104. Logical steps in, 106. Conduct, 185. Consecutive method, 219. Consciousness, 65. Function of, 66. Comparison of teacher's and pupil's method, 223. Complete living, 25. Curriculum, 122. Meaning of, 122. Origin of, 123. Growth of, 125. Enriching the, 127. A rational, 129. Test of, 129. First step in applying, 129. Order of importance of these lines, 130. Second step in applying, 132. Changes in suggested by child study, 146. Daily preparation, 169, 238. Definition, 108. Laws of, 110. Devices, 217. [tions, 17. Differentiation of institu- in the school, 19. [ing, 134. Disciplinary value of learn- Discriminating and unifying, 75. Diverting influences, 194. Duties as a citizen, 141. as a teacher, 149. Education What main aim is not, 33. 246 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. Primary aim of, 33. Purpose of, 25-37, 128. Knowledge of, 166. Relational order of, 131. Elements of the school, 21. Encouraging, 235. Errors in conducting reci- tation, 242. Feeling, function of, 76. Greek and Latin, 144. Governing, 149. Government, 176. Kinds of school, 176. Main line of school, 184. Hate, 79. [30. Harmony of the four views. Habits of activity, 157. Health Misfortune of bad, 38. Good, 173. Hearing, 59. Hints from nature, 35. Honesty, 155. Imagination, 101. Advance over memory, 102. Classes of, 103. [30. Importance of the right view, Incentives, 198. Natural, 199. Artificial, 199. Indifference, 79. Inspiring, 235. Interest, 68. Intuition, 117. Iterativeness, 73. Judgment, 110. Aspects of, 112. Justness, 156. Knowing, 74. Development of, 84. Stages in, 85. Basis of, 85. Stages of Distinguishing element in the, 117. Advance in the, 118. Knowledge giving value of learning, 134 Knowledge Most valuable, 145. of laws of life, 161. of methods, 167. of purpose of education, 166. Law, 23. Law, Fundamental, 178. Source of the, 179 Aspects of, 180. Law of the recitation, 236. Law in the mind, 228. Laboratory method, 222. Learner's method, 209, 210. Learning Value of, 133. Disciplinary and knowledge giving value, 134. Lecture method, 220. Lighting, 51. Love, 79. of occupation, 171. Magnetism, Personal, 174. Management of school, 176. Importance of, 176. Kinds of, 176. INDEX . 247 Mastery of circumstances, 174. Memory, 92. Classes of, 94. Law of, 97. Method, 207. Nature of, 208. Subject-matter of, 208. Definition of, 209. Classes of, 209. Learner's, 209, 210. Teacher's, 211. As a physical process, 218 Comparison of teacher's and pupil's, 223- Two views of, 223. Factors determining, 227. Methods of study, giving in- sight into, 234. Moral character, 28, 153. Motives, Pure, 197. Myopia Causes of, 52. Undesirability of, 53. Rules for prevention of, 53. Object method, 218. Order of importance of these lines, 130. Percept, 92. Physical nature of the child, 38. Power of sentiment, 183. Practice in the art of teach- ing, 168. Preparation Professional, 160. Daily, 169, 238. Testing on, 232. Problem, The, 25. Processes in teaching act, 207. Promiscuous method, 220. Punishments, School, 203. Corporal, 255. Purpose, 214. of education, 33, 25, 128. of the recitation, 231. of the school, 25. Rational freedom, 27. Rearing of a family, 139. Reasoning, 113. Classes of, 113. Implicit and explicit, 114. Inductive and deductive, 114. Recitation Nature of, 230. Purpose of, 231. Manner of conducting, 240. Common errors in conduct- ing, 242. Rhythm, 73. Right and wrong, knowledge of, 154. Right ideas of life, 198. Rules, 179. School Nature of, 13. Origin of, 16. Differentiation in, 19. Elements of, 21. Purpose of, 25. School an organization, 177. School government, 176. Schoolroom, Purpose of, 190. Presence of learner, 190. 248 STUDIES IN PEDAGOGY. Comfort of teacher and pu- pils, 191. Conditions, 46. Scholarship, 159. Seating, 55. Seeing, 60. Self-control, 158. Self-activity, 71. Self-preservation Direct, 135. Indirect, 137. Senses and sense organs, 57. Sensation Characteristics of, 87. Classes of, 87. Aspects of, 57. Comparison of general and special, 89. Sense-perception, 90. Classes of, 91. Object of, 91. Sentiment, Power of, 183. Sight, 195. Social influences, 201. Socratic method, 221. Source of the law, 179. Spending leisure time, 143. Steps, 216. in applying test, 129, 132. Stimulating, 235. Study, No danger of too much, 226. Student habits. Energetic, 169. Subject-matter, 212. of method, 208. General statement of, 213. Supplementing a knowledge of lesson, 233. Syllogism, 115. Sympathy with children, 171. Systematization, 116. Teacher Importance of, 149. Duties of, 149. Positive, 150. Negative, 151. Characteristics of, 152. Necessary, 152. Desirable, 172. Teacher's method, 211. Teaching, 150. Teaching act, 207. Processes in, 207. Temperature, 49. Test of curriculum, 129. Testing on preparation of lesson, 232. Things men are employed in, 138. Thought in the thing, 228. Thoughts of teachers, 163. Thoughts of thinkers, 164. Touch, 194. of teacher's and learner's mind, 231. Truthfulness, 154. Unity, 23, 178. between teacher and learner, 185, 189. between learner's ideal and real self, 186, 197. in the organization as a whole, 181. Broken, 202. INDEX 249 Restoration of, 203. Fundamental law, 178. Source of, 179. Aspects of, 180. Unifying and discriminating, 75. Vital touch of learner's and teacher's mind, 231. Will Functions of, 83. Study of, 83. Willing, 80. Wise and virtuous men and women, 29. SEP SI 1908 SEP 81 1903