Class Book. 3Caa£_ Bfc Copyright^ . COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. SCIENCE { FUNCTION } ANALYSIS Man gewinnt dadurch schon sehr vie], wenn man eine Menge von Untersuchungen unter die Formel einer ein- zigen Aufgabe bringen kann. Denn dadurch erleich- tert man sich nicnt allein selbst sein eigenes Geschaft, indem man es sich genau bestimmt, sondern auch jedem anderen, der es priifen will, das Urtheil, ob wir unserem Vorhaben ein Geniige gethan haben oder nicht. — Kant. PROBLEM SCIENCE f FUNCTION } ANALYSIS FORMULA SCIENCE { } ANALYSIS SCIENCE { X J ANALYSIS INDIVIDUAL GENERAL , UNIVERSAL BY GEORGE ASHTON BLACK, PH.D. NEW YORK PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR 1905 LIBRARY of CONGRESS I wo Copies Keceivea rEfl 2 IUU5 UW.SS o AAC. NO! J copy e. Copyright, 1905, by George Ashton Black Published January, 1905 The DeVinne Press. c^ ^ SCIENCE { FUNCTION^ ANALYSIS SCIENCE { } ANALYSIS SCIENCE \X] ANALYSIS C INDIVIDUAL 1 SCIENCE^ GENERAL ^ANALYSIS ( UNIVERSAL J DEDUCTION OF PEOBLEM AND FOEMULA DEFINITION Science = necessary { cognition } universal = the reso- lution of all cases of a general problem = Analysis. Hence Science \ function \ Analysis Hence Scienc e { ] Analysis Science \ x \ Analysis ( individual ^ Science < general > Analysis ( universal ) which satisfies the definition whether by resolving the prob- lem into the singular case marked by the only imaginary differential coefficient \ } and the general case marked by any real differential coefficient { x } where x is individual general universal through all moments of the logical deter- mination ( individual ^ real <. general > x ( universal ) or by determining the problem in relation to all moments of a single necessary { cognition \ universal according to Kant's classic enumeration of them in their proper order 7 and connection ; for the only three fundamentally distinct moments of the formula differ whether as intuition concept idea according to the rule ideal— or as synthesis analysis dialectic according to the rule method— of Science { func- tion } Analysis. Thus the formula lays down the Science as well as the Analysis of my original problem in the shape of a series of derivative problems, the demanded resolution of which, in the order and connection prescribed by the formula, is de- veloped in the sequel into an organon, yet to be a complete system, of Science j universal } Analysis. Note. The isolated variety i * i individual general universal is necessary and sufficient to integrate or satisfy the isolated differential equation ( intuition synthesis ideal < concept analysis )- method ( idea dialectic to which Kant's enumeration leads through the recognition of the enumeration in two equivalent formulas. Witness my intuition \ \ synthesis concept \ x \ analysis ideal ( \ method ( individual ) idea < general > dialectic ( universal ) DEDUCTION OF WOEK DEMANDED BY FOEMULA POSTULATE I / \ = a plane equilateral triangle the internal determination of which is only imaginary = the geometrical construction whether of the concept Science or of the concept Analysis referred to the vacant place of any correlative concept = the solution of one case of the general problem, Science \ } Analysis j / \ = a plane equilateral triangle the internal determina- tion of which is real in respect of only the middle point of the altitude = the geometrical construction whether of the concept Science or of the concept Analysis referred to the concept individual = the solution of one case of the general problem, Science [individual } Analysis. Ill Resolution of all cases of Science { individual} Analysis = solution of one case of Science {general} Analysis. IV Resolution of all cases of Science {general} Analysis = solu- tion of one case of Science { universal } Analysis. HENCE the work by corresponding stages, as follows. 9 I Resolution of all cases of Science j \ Analysis achieved in and through the integration of a simple differential equation derived from the solution of one case. A of Science \ } Analysis synthesis analysis ) method dialectic intuition / \ synthesis concept • analysis ideal) I / \ \ me thod of Science \ I / I / of Analysis 'idea /\ { / \ • dialectic' where the imaginary term, derived from the imaginary dif- ferential coefficient in 2, and posited in the shape of a blank space before Science and likewise before Analysis, should not be overlooked ; for it is necessary and sufficient in that place to indicate the singular case of my original problem, evidently the simplest case possible, which is alone in ques- tion now. 10 Note. 2 arises from distinction of successive stages in the reproduction of 1 by degrees according to a constant rule referred to Science { } Analysis in relation to which the whole of 1 was postulated. Thus the stages in question giveii Kant's terminology, are found to differ whether as intuition concept idea according to the rule ideal — or as synthesis analysis dialectic according to the rule method — of Science { } Analysis. 3 arises from reference, in one to one correspondence, of the successive moments of two equivalent formulas obtained from 2 to the same whole of possible Science { \ Analysis, which is thereby perfectly differentiated a priori ; followed by the integration of the resulting differential equation. The second moment of the integral represents the necessary identity in all the variety presented by the first moment. For the first moment may be conceived to undergo a gradual shortening of unit line until all difference in the variety line angle surface vanishes, and nothing is left but the identity in the same, in the image of a point. So conceived the first moment stands to the second in the relation of variable to limit. The third moment of the integral represents the necessary reference of all the variety presented by the first moment, to the representation whether of the variable or limit in question. LofC. li II Resolution of all cases of Science {individuals Analysis achieved in and through the integration of a simple differ- ential equation derived from the solution of one case. /- intuition /• concept > ideal idea of Science \ individual] Analysis synthesis analysis ^ method dialectic intuition synthesis ideal of individual Science concept D analysis A B idea AB x CD dialectic II ABC-D method of individual Analysis 12 Ill Resolution of all cases of Science j general ] Analysis achieved in and through the integration of a complex dif- ferential equation derived from the solution of one case. C D A B AB x CD II ABC'D intuition concept ( idea synthesis analysis dialectic ideal of Science [ general \ Analysis method method of general Analysis synthesis analysis dialectic m CD bD o / intuition concept idea C D A B AB x CD II ABC'D Z D X Y base multiplicand x x V% altitude multiplier area II product zZ D xX y Y base x i altitude = area II II II area = area 2 -f- area Yt. alt. x base Note. The complex form of the differential equation in 3 is rendered necessary by the specialty of the particular Science \ x } Analysis in question. Only through the cross refer- ence of the two equivalent formulas obtained from 2 could the same whole of possible Science { general } Analysis be perfectly differentiated a priori. 13 IV a Derivation from the solution of one case, of a com- pound differential equation demanding the resolution of all cases, of Science \ universal } Analysis. A c D A B AB x CD ABC'D Z D X Y base multiplicand x x % altitude multiplier area product zZ D xX yY = area x x Vz altitude = area II II area = area 2 altitude x base II area single manifold restrictive intuition ^ definite definable definitive concept > ideal individual general universal idea ) 2 of Science \ universal \ Analysis synthetical analytical dialectical synthesis 1 " " " analysis > method " " " dialectic ) 3 Here belong the empty tables ABC which follow. They perfectly differentiate the whole of possible Science 5 universal ] Analysis, and constitute a compound differen- tial equation demanding the resolution of all cases of that problem. 14 X'Brp >13 TP ,trB ' n -^ s 'T'Bn'B "BTp 'ire *tl£s 't^tl^s •■eip "ire tl£s sisiivny rrvsaaAMQ iSO aoHian 15 O s Q 02 M p & o EH O § p> EH M H ft 1 M P pq H PQ < EH "I'Bip "Bip 'ITS *UXS •^bub "Bip -its •ha's •qjuA's •'Bip -ITB •nA's SISAT finy ivsnaAiNQ do aoHj,a]? 16 I H D !zi o 02 J O w Q # «i 02 PS PS H O n o Eh •p3ip -eip -tre # il£s •paire "erp 'ire tea's •t^tia's "Bip -ire -has SISAT my rcvsaaAi^_Q jo aoHi,ay 17 I IV b Essay to refer recognized moments of the demanded resolution of all cases of Science { universal} Analysis each to its proper place in the formula demanding the resolution. On the supposition that pure reason, constant as the faculty of Science \ function } Analysis in all rationals of all times, but varied through all moments of a maximum dif- ferentiation and integration of that function in different rationals of different times, has somewhere in some context already cognized every step in the solution of every case of Science J universal} Analysis, but has not yet recognized every step in the solution of every case in its proper place in the resolution of all cases ; I propose to search out all and only the cognitions that are the content of that resolution, and arrange them each in that proper place as fixed for it a priori by Tables ABC. To be sure the task is not for only one rational, but for every one interested in the development as much as possible in himself of the same faculty that aforetime made the cognitions, and is now in his person called upon to recognize what it has itself in other persons already produced according to a fixed and ascertained formula. My own discovery of the required cognitions and reference of them to this or that place in the formula is sure and complete as regards the solution of only one case of the general problem in question j but all that is wanting to the perfection of the demanded resolution will undoubtedly be found, if able men, and such as are acquainted with what is classic in the use of pure reason, will endeavor to recognize the missing cognitions by the general but sufficient marks that relegate them to one or another place in the formula in correlation with one or another moment of the singular solution. 18 g m o m ►J C !zi o EH * « EH m M P O s S3 base = area -7- J^ altitude XXX J^ altitude = area -=- base II II II area =area 2 -f- area multiplicand x multiplier = pr. base x y 2 altitude = area ABxOD = ABO-D >h >h >> pq < < <<] < •X'Btp "Bip "ire 'il£s TBitb -erp -tre •nA's jt#il£s "erp 'ire 'nA's SISA1 19 V •^mp -etp •ire •hjCs •Yews "Btp •ire ■uAs i[\nAs reip 'tre ■n^Cs sisAivNy ivshhamji ^o aoHii3j\[ 20 ?U! 2 S905 Deacidified using the Bookkeeper process. Neutralizing agent: Magnesium Oxide Treatment Date: Sept. 2004 PreservationTechnologies A WORLD LEADER IN PAPER PRESERVATION 1 1 1 Thomson Park Drive Cranberry Township. PA 16066 (724)779-2111