HYshould _ BOYS be taugh"1"io SHOOT ? Gen.Geo.W.Wingate HYsliould BOYS be mghi-to SHOOT ? Gen.GeaW.Wingat8 9 •> ♦ 'J J \ UBRARYofCONafiESS] Two Copies Recesvu I GLASS ^ XXCe ^0 ij COPY B. W \ X -^-^ Published by the SUB-TARGET GUN CO. Boston New York London Copyrighted 1907 • * « « • • Oxford -Print Boston Why School Boys Should Be Taught to Shoot ? BY GENERAL GEORGE W. WINGATE President New York Public Schools Athletic League ^^rSiV ^pi^^ ^ / AwTix I 1 ^ 1 N these days of crowded cities and strenuous work all forms of exercise are valuable to growing boys. Shooting is an interesting open air sport, in which the skill attained con- stitutes a valuable possession through life. It also involves more physical exercise than is generally appreciated. In particular, it de- velops coolness of nerve under excitement, powers of observation and rapid judgment, which are important mental qualities. Its great benefit, however, is not so much to the boys who become expert shots, large though that is, as to their State and country. We should never forget that the existence of this re- public was maintained and its liberties won by the skill in shooting shown by our ancestors against the Indians and the British. In New England, New York, Virginia, the Carolinas, and later in Kentucky, the first settlers held iheir land and their lives by their skill as rifle- men. At Lexington, Bunker Hill and upon many other occasions during the Revolution, and later at New Orleans, this disciplined skill over- came the veterans of the British Army — ^who were far superior in every military sense to the hasty levies opposed to them — except that they were bad shots. This skill so impressed the world that even now the popular idea in many countries and among many of our own people is that America is a nation of marksmen. I regret to say that this is now very, very far from being the case; that while modern rifles have increased enormously in range and power, making it much more diffi- cult to handle them to the best advantage than those used by our forefathers, the ordinary young American knows nothing about their use, much less in fact than the ordinary emigrant who is likely to have served two or more years in the army of his native country. Here in the cities, there are no opportuni- ties for practice. In the country, there is little desire. There are many who have shot guns but rifles are rare. Thus, when last Spring I happened to be in a small place in Florida and wanted to borrow a rifle to shoot an alligator, I found that while every man had a shot gun there was not a rifle in the place. I have also found this to be the case in many other local- ities. If there is any rifle shooting, it is always at short distances and generally with small rifles, never with the military weapon. The regular army of the country is absurd- ly small and is not kept full. At present, it is 60,000 strong and is diminishing daily, as the pay is too small to induce enlistments. With nominally 20,000 coast artillery — one third what is needed to man our forts, and 1 0,000 in the Philippines, we have an available force of not 20,000 men. In fact, few know how hard it was to scrape together the 5 000 men that were recently sent to Cuba. In time of war the country must, therefore, in the future as in the past, look for its defence to hasty levies of vol- unteers. While not a military nation, we are a warlike and patriotic one. When the country calls, the best blood of our youth, both rich and poor, responds without hesitation. We can, as we did in the Civil War and in the Spanish War, rapidly assemble all the men we want. We can in a few months teach them consider- able drill and a liitle discipline — but^